Agenda packet — Roseville City Council, May 3, 2023 (part 6 of 8)

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE MAXIMUM

ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-110-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 194 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 195 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 196 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 197 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 198 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 199 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 200 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 201 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 202 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 203 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 204 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 205 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 206 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 207 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 208 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 209 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 210 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 211 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 212 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 213 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 214 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 215 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 216 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 217 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 218 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 219 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-031-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 220 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-032-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 221 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-033-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 222 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-034-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 223 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-035-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 224 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-036-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 225 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-037-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 226 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-038-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 227 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-039-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 235 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-040-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 236 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-041-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 237 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-042-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 238 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-043-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 239 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-044-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 240 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-045-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 241 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-046-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 242 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-047-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 243 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-048-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 244 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-049-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 245 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-050-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 246 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-051-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 247 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-052-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 248 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-053-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 249 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-054-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 250 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-055-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 251 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-056-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 252 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-057-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 253 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-058-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 254 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-059-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 255 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-060-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 256 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 Willdan Financial Services Page 80 of 86

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE MAXIMUM

ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-110-061-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 257 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 228 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 229 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 230 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 231 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 232 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 233 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 234 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 258 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 259 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 260 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 261 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 262 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 263 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 264 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 265 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 266 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 267 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 268 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 269 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 270 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 271 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 272 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 273 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 274 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 275 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 276 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 277 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 278 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 279 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 280 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-031-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 281 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-032-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 282 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-033-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 283 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-034-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 284 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-035-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 285 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-036-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 286 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-037-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 287 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 288 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 289 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 290 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 291 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 292 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 293 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 294 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 295 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 296 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 297 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 298 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 299 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 300 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 301 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 302 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 309 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 310 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 311 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 Willdan Financial Services Page 81 of 86

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE MAXIMUM

ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-130-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 312 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 313 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 314 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 315 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 316 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 317 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 318 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 319 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 320 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 321 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 322 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 323 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-031-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 324 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-032-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 325 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-033-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 326 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 303 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 304 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 305 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 306 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 307 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 308 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 327 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 328 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 329 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 330 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 331 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 332 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 333 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 334 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 335 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 336 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 337 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 338 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 339 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 340 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 341 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 342 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 343 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 344 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 345 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 346 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 347 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 348 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 349 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 350 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-150-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 450 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 451 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 452 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 453 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 454 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 455 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 456 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 457 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 458 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 459 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 460 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 Willdan Financial Services Page 82 of 86

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE MAXIMUM

ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-150-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 461 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 462 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 463 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 464 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 465 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 466 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 467 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 468 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 469 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 470 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 471 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 472 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 473 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 474 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 475 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 476 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 477 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 478 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 479 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-031-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 480 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-032-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 481 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-033-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 482 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-034-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 483 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-035-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 484 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G BK V PG74 480-150-036-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 485 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 432 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G MOR V-74 480-160-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 433 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 434 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 435 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 436 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 437 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 438 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 439 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 440 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 441 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 442 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 443 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 444 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT #7 PHASE G MOR V-74 480-160-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 445 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 446 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 447 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 448 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 449 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 486 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 487 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 488 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 489 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 490 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 491 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 492 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 493 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 494 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 495 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 496 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 497 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-031-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 498 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 Willdan Financial Services Page 83 of 86

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE MAXIMUM

ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-160-032-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 499 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-033-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 500 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-034-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 501 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-035-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 502 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-036-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 503 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-037-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 504 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-170-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 21 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 22 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 23 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 24 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 25 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 26 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 27 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-170-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 28 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 29 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 30 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 31 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 32 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 33 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 34 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 35 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 36 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 37 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 38 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 39 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 40 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 41 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 42 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 45 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 46 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 47 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 48 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 49 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 50 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-031-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 51 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-032-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 52 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-033-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 53 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-034-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 54 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-035-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 55 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-036-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 56 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-170-037-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 57 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-038-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 58 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-039-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 59 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-040-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 60 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-041-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 61 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BL V PG 75 480-170-042-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 62 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-043-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 63 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-044-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 64 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-045-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 65 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-046-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 66 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-047-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 67 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-048-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 68 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-052-000 A 100.00 100.00 POR LOT 43 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-053-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 44 & POR 43 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-180-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 69 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 70 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 Willdan Financial Services Page 84 of 86

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE MAXIMUM

ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-180-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 71 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 72 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 73 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT #8 MOR V-75 480-180-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 74 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 75 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 76 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 77 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 78 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 79 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 80 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 81 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 82 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 90 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 91 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-017-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 92 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-018-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 93 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 94 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 95 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 96 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 97 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 98 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 99 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 100 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 101 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 102 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-028-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 103 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-029-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 104 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 105 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK VN PG 75 480-190-001-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 1 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-002-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 2 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-003-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 3 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-004-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 4 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-005-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 5 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-006-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 6 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-007-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 7 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-008-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 8 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-009-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 9 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-010-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 10 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-011-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 11 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-012-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 12 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-013-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 13 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-014-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 14 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-015-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 15 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-016-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 16 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-019-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 19 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-020-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 20 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-021-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 83 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-022-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 84 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-023-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 85 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-024-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 86 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-190-025-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 87 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-026-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 88 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-027-000 A 100.00 100.00 LOT 89 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-190-030-000 A 100.00 100.00 POR LOTS 17 & 18 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-190-031-000 A 100.00 100.00 POR LOTS 17 & 18 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 Willdan Financial Services Page 85 of 86

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE MAXIMUM

ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 4,759
LEVIED PARCELS 4,752
MAXIMUM ASMT $481,336.00
CHARGE $481,336.00
Willdan Financial Services Page 86 of 86
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-173

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepar e and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-173 was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-174

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District” ), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2023/2024, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance, operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to seek the Annual Levy of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay the annual costs of the improvements.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for lands cape, lighting, park and hardscape areas including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, project identification signs, special street signs, special lighting for signage, granite entryways, sculptures and sculpture park, special paving materials, other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements. 2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District and any annexations thereto. The District includes the parcels generally within the area known as the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting Disrict. The District is known and designated as the:

“Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District”

Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously authorized by City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 5 Public Hearing(s): The City Council he reby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing the publishing of this Resolution once in the local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, June 7, 2023 a t 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 23-174

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-174 was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-175

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report” ) for the district known and designated as the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and High ways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the asses sments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and,

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City C ouncil the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and,

WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within each Zone, as set forth in said Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:

a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District
2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption o f this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 23-175

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-175 was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590

51.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510

www.willdan.com

City of Roseville

Olympus Pointe
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2023/24 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: May 3, 2023
Public Hearing: June 7, 2023

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 1 A. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION ..................................... 2 C. CLARIFICATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS ......................................... 2 D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT ............................................... 3 E. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT ............................. 3 F. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS ......................... 5 G. DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES ............................ 6 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ....................................................................... 7 A. GENERAL ................................................................................................ 7 B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS ................................................................................ 7 C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................ 9 D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA ....................................................... 11 E. BASE MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATES ............................................. 11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ..............................................................................................12 A. FY 2023/24 BUDGET ............................................................................ 12 B. FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT RATES ..................................................... 13 C. FY 2023/24 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION ..................................... 13 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS .................................................... 13 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ....... 18 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP .............................................................19 APPENDIX B — FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT ROLL ..................................................21 DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1

I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the certain public improvements within the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”) within the City. The District, which was formed in 1989, is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “1972 Act”).

The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District boundaries, any new annexations, improvements maintained by the District and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024.

The District consists of two (2) benefit Z ones (“Zones”). The improvements that benefit properties within each Zone and the costs associated with those improvements are identified and budgeted separately. Each parcel within a Zone is assessed proportionately for only those improvements and service s that are a direct and special benefit to the properties within the respective Zone. The assessments are based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements that provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Placer County Assessor’s Office.

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will by resolution, order t he improvements to be made, if any, and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District and respective Zones for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2023/24. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved by the City Council.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
All assessments d escribed in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID (“Article XIIIC” and “Article XIIID”) and the provisions of the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act [Government Code Section 53750 and following] (the “Implementation Act”). Articles XIIIC and XIIID and the Implementation Act collectively are hereinafter referred to as “Proposition 218”.

The District’s Maximum Assessment Rates for all Zones and the Inflationary Adjustment Factor were previously approved and confirmed through property owner ballot proceedings and as such, comply with the provisions of Proposition 218.

C. CLARIFICATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS
In order to increase consistency with the City’s other districts and to facilitate presentation within the Engineer’s Report , the names of both Zones were redesignated, commencing with FY 2007/2008, as follows:

• The “Non -Residential/Multi-Family Residential Zone” was redesignated to “Zone A.” (1)

• The “Residential Zone” was redesignated to “Zone D.” (2)

(1) Prior to FY 2005/2006, this territory was known as “Zone A”. In FY 2005/2006, Zone A was redesignated to the “Non-Residential/Multi-Family Residential Zone”. (2) Prior to FY 2005/2006, this territory was known as “Zones B & C”. In FY 2005/2006, Zones B & C were combined and redesignated to the “Residential Zone”.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3

D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT
The Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District is located in the City of Roseville at the southerly edge of Placer County, northeast of the intersection of Interstate 80 and Douglas Boulevard. The site is generally bounded by Interstate 80 on the west, East Roseville Parkway and Olympus Drive to the north, Douglas Boulevard to the south and Sierra College Boulevard to the east. See Appendix A for a rendering of the District boundary map.

The District consists of two zones as described below. The se zones were established by the City through a District reengineering commencing with the FY 2005/2006 levy. Additional information regarding the reengineering is provided in Section III of the Report.

Zone A

Zone A includes land zoned for non-residential and multi-family residential uses.

The Zone comprises the majority of the District and is primarily west and south of East Roseville Parkway, east of Interstate 80 and north of Douglas Boulevard. This Zone contains 581.78 acres of assessabl e land that was originally designated as “Zone A.” The area was then redesignated as the “Non -Residential/Multi-Family Zone” commencing with the FY 2005/06 and then redesignated back to “Zone A” commencing with the FY 2007/08 levy.

Zone D

Zone D includes two single-family residential developments on the eastern side of the District. The Zone is bisected by Olympus Drive and Sierra College Boulevard on the District’s eastern boundary and includes 468 developed single-family residences. Originally, each residential development was designated as separate zone (Zones B and C). The area was redesignated as the “Residential Zone” commencing with the FY 2005/2006 levy and then redesignated to the “Zone D” commencing with the FY 2007/2008 levy.

E. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or const ruction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which ar e necessary or convenient for the maintenance or DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limit ed to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, tri mming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Furthermore, the 19 72 Act specifies that where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the gov erning body may choose to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any available and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of the cost of the DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

F. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS
This District, through the levy special assessments, provides funding for the maintenance and operation of the following improvements located within the public rights-of-way and dedicated easements: project identification signs, including surrounding l andscape and hardscape; special street materials; sculptures and sculpture park; special street signs; special lighting for the project identification signs and special illuminated street signs; and landscaped street medians (the “Improvements”). The specific locations of the improvements within the district are described as follows:

1. Zone A
a. Landscaped Median Islands:
• Eureka Road from Douglas Boulevard to Taylor Road Connector • Sunrise Avenue from southern boundary of the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan (the “NERSP”) to East Roseville Parkway
• East Roseville Parkway from Douglas Boulevard to Rocky Ridge Drive • Douglas Boulevard from eastern boundary of NERSP to Rocky Ridge Drive
b. Project identification signs (granite entryways) and special paving materials:
• Eureka Road at Douglas Boulevard
• East Roseville Parkway at Douglas Boulevard
• Eureka Road at Taylor Road
c. Sculpture and Sculpture Park:
• Aris Demetrio’s original sculpture located on Parcel 14 • Sculpture park (0.85 acres located on Parcel 14)
d. Special street signs:
• Eureka Road at Sunrise Avenue, Rocky Ridge Drive, Lead Hill Drive and Douglas Boulevard
• Lead Hill Drive at Rocky Ridge Drive
• Sunrise Avenue at Auto Mall entrance
• East Roseville Parkway at Taylor Road, Lead Hill Drive, Olympus Drive and Douglas Boulevard
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 • Olympus Drive at Sierra College Boulevard:

2. Zone D
a. Landscaped Frontage:
• Southern side of Olympus Drive from East Roseville Parkway to Sierra College Boulevard, excluding any landscaping not within or adjacent to the Zone
• Northern side of Olympus Drive from the Zone boundary (the former Zone C boundary), which is 175 feet so uthwest of Corniche Lane, to Sierra College Boulevard, western side of Sierra College Boulevard from Olympus Drive to the Zone boundary (the former Zone C boundary), which is approximately 600 feet.
b. Project identification signs and special paving materials:
• Sierra College Boulevard at Olympus Drive
G. DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the Improvements and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of Improvements or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the Improvements including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, mowing, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste.

Servicing means the furnishing of water and electricity for the Improvements including any decorative lighting and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the special street signs.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

A. GENERAL
The Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by public agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of streetlights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities. S treets and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than the assessed value.

“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”

In addition, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act require that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost for the proportional special benefit conferred to that parcel. Article XIIID and the Implementation Act further provide that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. They also require that publicly owned properties, which specifically benefit from the improvements, be assessed.

B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service;”
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the dist rict or to the public at large .

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”

The City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with Article XIIID and the Implementation Act for both the Non - Residential/Multi-Family Zone (Zone A) and the Residential Zone (Zone D). Each Zone’s Improvements, the associated costs and assessments had been reviewed, identified, and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution and Act.

All Improvements associated with these Zones have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties to their full potential. As such, these Improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these Improvements would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the Improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the Improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within these Zones receives special benefit from the Improvements maintained and financed by the assessments. Specifical ly, the assessments associated with the Zones are for the maintenance of the Improvements installed as part of the original development of the parcels within the Zones. The desirability and security of properties within each Zone is enhanced by the close proximity of these amenities to those properties.

The annual assessments outlined in this Report are proposed to cover the estimated costs to provide all necessary service, operation, administration, and maintenance required to keep the Zone Improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition.

The special benefits associated with these improvements are specifically:

• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the Zones providing a positive representation of the area.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, and dust and debris control.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well -maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels within the Zones by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

All of the preceding special benefits allowed the property to be developed for the enjoyment of the property owners and contribute to an ongoing specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the Zones.

The improvements are for the special benefit, enhancement, and use of properties within the Zones. Although the improvements include public easements, rights-of- way, streets, and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the construction and installation of these Improvements were only necessary for the development of properties within the Zones and were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the Zone’s boundaries.

Therefore, any public access or us e of the Improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Zones or to the public at large. In making this determination, it should be noted that all parkway and perimeter landscaping within the City is both funded and maintained by a special district, individual property owners or through some type of association.

C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
To establish the special benefit to the individual lots and parcels within the District an Equivalent Benefit Un it (“EBU”) system is used. The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the Improvements are apportioned as a function of land use type, size, and development. Acreage of common area parcels shall be apportioned to the remaining assessable parcels of a subdivision and/or parcel split(s) related to the creation of the common area parcel(s).

EBU Application Table

Land Use EBU per Unit/Acre
Single Family Residential 1.00 per Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 per Acre
Non-Residential 1.00 per Acre
Exempt 0.00 per Acre

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10

1. Definitions and Formulas Related to the Product Type EBU Method

Single-Family Residential — This land use is defined as a fully subdivided residential parcel that is part of a final tract map.

Multi-Family Residential — This land use is defined as a residential parcel anticipated to have or has more than one residential unit.

Non-Residential — Parcels that are not considered Single Family Residential, Multi- Family Residential or Exempt.

Exempt Parcels — This land use identifies properties that are not assessed and are assigned 0.0 EBU per acre. This land use classification may include, but is not limited, to lots or parcels identified as public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas, greenbelts, parkways, park p roperties and other publicly owned properties that are part of the District Improvements.

These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the Improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

2. Zone Benefit Formula
The benefit formula applied to parcels within each Zone is based on the preceding Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) Application Table. Each parcel's EBU correlates the parcel’s special benefit received as compared to all other parcels benefiting from the Improvements.

The following formula is used to calculate the EBU for each parcel (proportional benefit).

Parcel Type EBU x Units/Acres = Parcel EBU

The total number of Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) is the sum of all individual EBUs applied to parcels within each Zone that receive a special benefit from the Improvements. An assessment amount per EBU (Assessment Rate) for each Zone is established by t aking the total costs associated with the Zone’s Improvements and dividing that amount by the total number of EBUs within each Zone of all parcels benefiting from those Improvements. This Rate is then applied back to each individual parcel based on their a ssigned EBUs to determine the parcel’s proportionate special benefit and assessment obligation from those Improvements.

Zone Budget/ Total EBU = Assessment per EBU

Assessment per EBU x Parcel EBU = Maximum Parcel Assessment Amount

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11

D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
The purpose of establishing an Assessment Range Formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessments rather than initiating protest ballot proceedings to approve small increases in annual costs. This District provides for an annual adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rate in an amount equal to three percent (3%).

The Maximum Assessment Rate is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment rate (less than or equal to this Maximum Assessment Rate) is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

Although the Maximum Assessment Rate will increase each year, the actual assessment rate may go up and down as compared to the previous year(s). The Maximum Assessment Rate adjustment is designed to allow for the adjustment of the annual assessment f or inflation in order to maintain the original purchasing power of the District budget. The Maximum Assessment Rate calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adj usted maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate, then the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner b alloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to Proposition 218 balloting requirements.

E. BASE MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATES
The base assessment rates and the annual inflationary adjustment to each Zone are listed in the table below:

Zone Base Year
Base Year
Maximum
Assessment
Rate per EBU
Annual
Inflationary
Adjustment (1)
Zone A FY 2005/06 $296.65 3.00%
Zone D FY 2005/06 $99.76 3.00%

(1) The Annual Inflationary Adjustment commences with the Fiscal Year 2006/2007 assessments.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 III. DISTRICT BUDGET

A. FY 2023/24 BUDGET

Fund balance information of each Zone is reported in Section C on the following page.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 B. FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT RATES

C. FY 2023/24 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS

Contract Maintenance - Landscaping – Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping improvements, irrigation, and related drainage systems, as well as m aintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”). The costs to maintain improvements within the District’s entryway areas are not included in this amount.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 Contract Maintenance - Parks - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of park improvements, as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

Repair & Maintenance - Landscaping/Parks - This line item includes repairs or maintenance items that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Maintenance - Parks City Staff - This line item includes maintenance items that are performed by the Parks staff.

Repair & Maintenance – Tree Work - This line item includes annual costs for tree maintenance not included in the annual contract maintenance portio n of the budget. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures - Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserve Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year that were previously funded or accumulated in the Rehabilitation Reserve. The Rehabilitation Reserve is used to accumulate funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation or replacement o f District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

ADMINISTRATION COSTS

City Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City Finance Department and other Departments in preparing the annual budget for the Engineer’s Report, together with other financial information required to determine the annual assessment. These costs would also include the preparation, posting and publishing of public notices required for City Council action relating to the District , as well as costs to perform legal review of documents.

Contract Administration – Park’s Dept – Estimated Costs of Park and Recreation Department staff to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and overall repair and maintenance of the District. This amount also includes the cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Consulting and Professional Services – Includes the costs and expens es of contracting with various professionals to provide legal, engineering and district administration services directly related to the District, including the calculation of the annual assessment amounts and the preparation of the Engineer’s’ Report.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out-of-pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

Replenishment/(Use) of Operating Reserve – A “Replenishment” increases the levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. On the other hand, a “Use” of the Operating Reserve decreases the levy by drawing funds from the Operating Reserve for current year expenditures. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Operating Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Contribution for / (Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

BALANCE TO LEVY - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current fiscal year for each zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the total District costs together with any applicable adjustments to the budget as described above.

ASSESSMENT RATES:

Total Assessable Acreage - The total acreage within each zone expected to be assessed in the current fiscal year.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 Total Assessable Units - The total number of assessable single-family units within each zone expected to be assessed in the current fiscal year.

Total Equivalent Be nefit Units (“EBUs”) - Total assessable EBUs within the District for the current fiscal year. Each assessable parcel is assigned EBUs as shown in Section II C of this Report.

Applied Assessment Rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) - The assessment rate per EBU to be applied to the applicable Zone for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Assessment Rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) - The maximum assessment rate per EBU that can be applied to the applicable Zone for the current fiscal year.

Potential Maximum Assessment Per Zone – The total amount that can be assessed to all parcels within each Zone for the current fiscal year based upon the expected number of assessable units and acres.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

OPERATING RESERVE

Beginning Operating Reserve Balance 7 -1-2023 (est.) - The anticipated beginning balance of cash and receivables net of any unpaid prior year obligations for each Zone. These beginning balances shall be used to fund each Zone’s expenditures from July 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023, as the Operating Reserve is required to compensate for the approximate six -month delay between the start of the District’s fiscal year and the receipt of the collections from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

Replenish from FY 2023/24 Levy – This amount is added to the FY 2023/24 levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six -month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Op erating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from the period of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2023/24 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund FY 2023/24 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve may be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operating Reserve Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17 Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Operating Reserve Balance 6 -30-2024 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reserve balance/(deficit) for each Zone as of June 30, 2024. The size of each Zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance, service and incidental expenses from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the Agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each Zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six -months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are received from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

REHABILITATION RESERVE

Beginning Rehab Reserve Balance 7-1-2023 (est.) — The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of July 1, 2023. Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

Collect from FY 2023/24 Levy — This amount is added to the FY 2023/24 levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation pr ojects, replacements, restorations or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2023/24 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies expected to be transferred out of the Rehabil itation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Rehabilitat ion Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department, in DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Should the District have no Rehabilitation Reserve or related activ ity, the Rehabilitation Reserve information may not be presented in the Report.

E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

The Report provides a five -year Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) which shows projected expenditures by Zone related to the rehabilitation, restoration and/or replacement of District improvements, and other allowable costs. The Current Fiscal Year CIP is shown in the preceding Budget Section A. The projected CIP costs for the remaining four years are shown in the table below.

Zone A

Zone D

Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Op erating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19

APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP

The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report.

These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a rendering of the District’s Boundaries is pres ented herein.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2023/24 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 21 APPENDIX B — FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT ROLL

Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

A listing of parcels to be assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, may be submitted to the City Clerk, under a separate cover, and by reference is made part of this Report.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and other property that cannot be developed, excepting common area parcels. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempt from assessment.

The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2023/24 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Co ntroller.

The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the a ssessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
015-450-014-000 Non Residential A 289.84 $ 549.97 $ 0.0 1.0890 1.09 1.1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 27-1 015-450-015-000 Non Residential A 243.52 462.10 0.0 0.9150 0.92 PAR 2 PMOR 27-1 015-450-024-000 Non Residential A 286.90 544.42 0.0 1.0780 1.08 POR LOT 9 NORTHEAST PLAN #2P-97 015-450-027-000 Non Residential A 566.64 1,075.20 0.0 2.1290 2.13 2.1 AC LOT 13 NORTHEAST PLAN#2P-97& FR SEC 36 11 6 015-450-030-000 Non Residential A 272.00 516.14 0.0 1.0220 1.02 1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 27-131 015-450-031-000 Non Residential A 501.70 951.98 0.0 1.8850 1.89 1.9AC PAR 2 PMOR 27-131 015-450-042-000 Non Residential A 1,662.60 3,154.75 0.0 6.2467 6.25 1.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28 89 015-450-044-000 Non Residential A 323.30 613.46 0.0 1.2147 1.21 PAR 3 PMOR 28 89 015-450-057-000 Non Residential A 424.90 806.28 0.0 1.5965 1.60 TAYLOR RD 1905 ROS 1.6 AC POR PAR 4 PMOR 29-11 015-450-058-000 Non Residential A 531.14 1,007.83 0.0 1.9956 2.00 2.O AC POR PARS 1 2 & 4 PMOR 29-11 015-450-059-000 Non Residential A 770.16 1,461.40 0.0 2.8937 2.89 2.9 AC PAR 3 & POR PARS 1 2 & 4 PMOR 29-11 015-450-063-000 Non Residential A 485.62 921.47 0.0 1.8246 1.82 1.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-106 015-450-064-000 Non Residential A 638.98 1,212.47 0.0 2.4008 2.40 2.5 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-106 015-450-065-000 Non Residential A 511.18 969.95 0.0 1.9206 1.92 2.0 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-106 015-450-066-000 Non Residential A 715.66 1,357.97 0.0 2.6889 2.69 2.8 AC PAR 4 PMOR 29-106 015-450-079-000 Non Residential A 2,625.36 4,981.58 0.0 9.8640 9.86 11.5 AC PAR 3 & 4 PMOR 27-131 & SEC 36 11 6 015-450-080-000 Non Residential A 444.96 844.30 0.0 1.6718 1.67 PAR A PMOR 32-133 015-450-083-000 Non Residential A 355.98 675.47 0.0 1.3375 1.34 PAR E PMOR 32-133 015-450-085-000 Non Residential A 1,156.92 2,195.25 0.0 4.3468 4.35 1.3AC PAR F PMOR 33-135 015-450-086-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 16.1 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 28 89 046-070-006-000 MF Residential A 2,688.18 5,100.77 0.0 10.1000 10.10 9.6 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-012-001-000 Non Residential A 13,173.44 24,996.30 0.0 49.4950 49.50 53.2 AC PAR 4 PMOR 22-158 SBE# 2737-31-3 048-013-001-000 Non Residential A 535.04 1,015.26 0.0 2.0103 2.01 2.1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-12 048-013-004-000 Non Residential A 732.62 1,390.14 0.0 2.7526 2.75 2.6 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-12 048-013-005-000 Non Residential A 366.30 695.07 0.0 1.3763 1.38 1.3 AC PAR 4 PMOR 29-12 048-013-006-000 Non Residential A 2,661.56 5,050.27 0.0 10.0000 10.00 10.0AC POR PAR 2 & 3 PMOR 26-145 048-013-007-000 Non Residential A 266.14 505.03 0.0 1.0000 1.00 1 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-20 048-013-008-000 Non Residential A 346.00 656.53 0.0 1.3000 1.30 1.3 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-20 048-013-009-000 Non Residential A 104.06 197.47 0.0 0.3910 0.39 PAR 4 PMOR 29-20 048-013-010-000 Non Residential A 266.14 505.03 0.0 1.0000 1.00 1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-20 048-013-011-000 Non Residential A 1,473.00 2,795.02 0.0 5.5344 5.53 6.2 AC POR PAR 1 PMOR 32-28 048-013-012-000 MF Residential A 1,758.12 3,336.01 0.0 6.6056 6.61 7.4 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-013-013-000 Non Residential A 771.84 1,464.58 0.0 2.9000 2.90 PAR 5 & POR 2 PMOR BK 29 PG 12 048-013-014-000 Non Residential A 745.22 1,414.08 0.0 2.8000 2.80 POR PCL 2 PMOR BK 29 PG 12 048-021-016-000 Non Residential A 221.96 421.19 0.0 0.8340 0.83 PAR A PMOR 27-157 048-021-017-000 Non Residential A 663.78 1,259.54 0.0 2.4940 2.49 2.5 AC PAR B PMOR 27-157 048-021-018-000 Non Residential A 826.14 1,567.60 0.0 3.1040 3.10 3.1 AC PAR C PMOR 27-157 048-021-019-000 Non Residential A 738.58 1,401.45 0.0 2.7750 2.78 2.8 AC PAR D PMOR 27-157 048-021-020-000 Non Residential A 979.98 1,859.51 0.0 3.6820 3.68 3.7 AC PAR E PMOR 27-157 048-021-021-000 Non Residential A 1,051.84 1,995.87 0.0 3.9520 3.95 4.0 AC PAR F PMOR 27-157 048-021-022-000 Non Residential A 570.36 1,082.27 0.0 2.1430 2.14 2.1 AC PAR G PMOR 27-157 City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
048-021-052-000 MF Residential A 3,357.80 6,371.37 0.0 12.6159 12.62 11.9 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-021-053-000 Non Residential A 112.86 214.18 0.0 0.4241 0.42 POR PAR 1 PMOR 32-28 048-451-003-000 Non Residential A 546.42 1,036.82 0.0 2.0530 2.05 2.1 AC PAR 2 PMOR 27-36 SBE# 2748-31-31 048-451-004-000 Non Residential A 91.54 173.73 0.0 0.3440 0.34 PAR 1 PMOR 27-36 048-451-005-000 Non Residential A 534.70 1,014.60 0.0 2.0090 2.01 2 AC PAR 3 PMOR 27-36 048-451-006-000 Non Residential A 2,587.56 4,909.87 0.0 9.7220 9.72 9.7AC PAR 4 PMOR 27-36 048-451-007-000 Non Residential A 161.02 305.54 0.0 0.6050 0.61 PAR 18 PMOR 27-36 048-451-009-000 Park A - - 0.0 0.0000 - PAR 5 PARK PMOR 27-36 048-451-010-000 Open Space A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 5.2AC PAR 6 COMMON AREA PMOR 27-36 048-451-011-000 Non Residential A 259.50 492.40 0.0 0.9750 0.98 POR PAR 8 & 9 PMOR 27-36 048-451-012-000 Non Residential A 857.54 1,627.20 0.0 3.2220 3.22 3.2 AC PAR 7 PMOR 27-36 048-451-013-000 Non Residential A 176.98 335.84 0.0 0.6650 0.67 PAR 17 PMOR 27-36 048-451-014-000 Non Residential A 260.02 493.41 0.0 0.9770 0.98 1AC PAR 16 PMOR 27-36 048-451-015-000 Non Residential A 425.30 807.03 0.0 1.5980 1.60 1.6 AC POR PAR 14 & 15 PMOR 27-36 048-451-016-000 Non Residential A 1,144.46 2,171.62 0.0 4.3000 4.30 4.3 AC POR PAR 8 & 9 PMOR 27-36 048-451-018-000 Non Residential A 358.26 679.82 0.0 1.3461 1.35 1.4 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-23 048-451-019-000 Non Residential A 307.08 582.70 0.0 1.1538 1.15 1.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-23 048-451-020-000 Non Residential A 180.72 342.91 0.0 0.6790 0.68 POR PAR 12 PMOR 27-36 048-451-022-000 Non Residential A 3,062.12 5,810.33 0.0 11.5050 11.51 11.5 AC POR PAR 10 PMOR 27-36 048-451-024-000 Non Residential A 332.16 630.27 0.0 1.2480 1.25 1.1 AC POR PAR 13 PMOR 27-36 048-451-026-000 Non Residential A 239.24 453.97 0.0 0.8989 0.90 POR PARS 14 & 15 PMOR 27-36 048-452-004-000 Non Residential A 2,883.00 5,470.45 0.0 10.8320 10.83 10.8 AC L 6 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-005-000 Non Residential A 1,651.50 3,133.69 0.0 6.2050 6.21 5.6 AC POR L9 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-006-000 Non Residential A 202.54 384.33 0.0 0.7610 0.76 POR PAR 2 & 3 PMOR 28-73 048-452-007-000 Non Residential A 511.02 969.65 0.0 1.9200 1.92 1.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-73 048-452-009-000 Non Residential A 3,486.64 6,615.85 0.0 13.1000 13.10 13.1 AC POR PAR 4 PMOR 28-73 048-452-010-000 Non Residential A 1,117.84 2,121.11 0.0 4.2000 4.20 4.2 AC POR PAR 4 PMOR 28-73 048-452-011-000 Non Residential A 617.74 1,172.17 0.0 2.3210 2.32 1.7ACPOR L 9 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-012-000 Non Residential A 724.74 1,375.19 0.0 2.7230 2.72 2.3 AC POR L 4 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-013-000 Non Residential A 483.34 917.13 0.0 1.8160 1.82 2.2 AC P L 4 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-014-000 Non Residential A 931.54 1,767.59 0.0 3.5000 3.50 3.5 AC L 5 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-015-000 Non Residential A 639.04 1,212.57 0.0 2.4010 2.40 2.4 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 28-96 048-452-016-000 Non Residential A 1,342.48 2,547.36 0.0 5.0440 5.04 5 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 28-96 048-452-017-000 Non Residential A 920.36 1,746.38 0.0 3.4580 3.46 3.5 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-96 048-452-019-000 Non Residential A 2,043.28 3,877.09 0.0 7.6770 7.68 7.7 AC PAR 2 & 3 PMOR 27-100 048-452-020-000 Non Residential A 708.50 1,344.38 0.0 2.6620 2.66 2.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 27-100 048-452-021-000 Non Residential A 2,986.80 5,667.41 0.0 11.2220 11.22 11.2 AC L 7 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-022-000 Non Residential A 517.14 981.27 0.0 1.9430 1.94 1.9 AC PAR 4 PMOR 28-74 048-452-023-000 Non Residential A 710.36 1,347.92 0.0 2.6690 2.67 2.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-74 048-452-024-000 Non Residential A 308.20 584.82 0.0 1.1580 1.16 1.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 28-74 048-452-025-000 Non Residential A 343.34 651.48 0.0 1.2900 1.29 1.3 PAR 3 PMOR 28-74 Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
048-452-026-000 Non Residential A 1,623.54 3,080.66 0.0 6.1000 6.10 6.1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 35-36 048-452-027-000 Non Residential A 665.38 1,262.57 0.0 2.5000 2.50 2.5 AC PAR 2 PMOR 35-36 048-452-028-000 Non Residential A 425.84 808.04 0.0 1.6000 1.60 1.6 AC PAR 3 PMOR 35-36 048-460-023-000 Park A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 1.9 AC LOT 15 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 MOR Y-64 048-460-024-000 Non Residential A 2,567.20 4,871.24 0.0 9.6455 9.65 7.3 AC LOT 16 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 MOR Y-64 048-460-025-000 Non Residential A 2,044.64 3,879.67 0.0 7.6821 7.68 5.8 AC LOT 17 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 MOR Y-64 048-460-026-000 Non Residential A 743.50 1,410.79 0.0 2.7935 2.79 2.1 AC LOT 18 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 MOR Y-64 048-460-027-000 Open Space A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 25.9 AC L19 OPN SP FLD PLAIN ACCESS BIKE PATH Y-64 048-460-030-000 Non Residential A 1,612.90 3,060.46 0.0 6.0600 6.06 4.6 AC P LOTS 2&3 STONE POINT SUBD 00-007 MOR Y-64 048-460-031-000 Non Residential A 1,647.50 3,126.12 0.0 6.1900 6.19 4.7 AC LOT5& P LOTS3&4 STONE POINT SUBD00-007 Y-64 048-460-032-000 Non Residential A 526.18 998.44 0.0 1.9770 1.98 1.5 AC POR LOT 1 & 2 STONE POINT SUBD Y-64 048-460-034-000 MF Residential A 787.14 1,493.62 0.0 2.9575 2.96 3.3 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-460-035-000 Non Residential A 477.08 905.26 0.0 1.7925 1.79 2.0 AC POR PAR 1 PMOR 32-28 048-460-036-000 Non Residential A 2,088.76 3,963.40 0.0 7.8479 7.85 5.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 32-70 048-460-037-000 Non Residential A 315.06 597.85 0.0 1.1838 1.18 PAR 2 PMOR 32-70 048-460-038-000 Non Residential A 315.06 597.85 0.0 1.1838 1.18 PAR 3 PMOR 32-70 048-460-039-000 Non Residential A 1,982.54 3,761.84 0.0 7.4488 7.45 5.6 AC PAR 4 PMOR 32-70 048-460-058-000 Non Residential A 7,079.76 13,433.71 0.0 26.6000 26.60 POR LOT 6, 7, 8 & 9 STONE POINT II MOR BK AA PG 77 456-290-001-000 Non Residential A 120.24 228.17 0.0 0.4518 0.45 UNT110-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-002-000 Non Residential A 40.04 76.01 0.0 0.1505 0.15 UNT115-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-003-000 Non Residential A 81.04 153.78 0.0 0.3045 0.30 UNT120-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-004-000 Non Residential A 92.18 174.94 0.0 0.3464 0.35 UNT130-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-005-000 Non Residential A 101.16 191.96 0.0 0.3801 0.38 UNT140-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-006-000 Non Residential A 106.10 201.35 0.0 0.3987 0.40 UNT210-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-007-000 Non Residential A 127.40 241.76 0.0 0.4787 0.48 UNT220-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-009-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - CMN ARA FLR 1 BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-010-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - CMN ARA FLR 2 BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0108884 456-290-011-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 1.0A PAR C - CMN ARA N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0122733 456-290-012-000 Non Residential A 88.60 168.12 0.0 0.3329 0.33 UNT230-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0122733 456-290-013-000 Non Residential A 84.18 159.74 0.0 0.3163 0.32 UNT240-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0122733 456-290-014-000 Non Residential A 50.40 95.65 0.0 0.1894 0.19 UNT250-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR CND-#0122733 456-300-007-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - PAR B COMMON AREA N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-015-000 Non Residential A 60.92 115.60 0.0 0.2289 0.23 UNIT 390 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-019-000 Non Residential A 70.38 133.58 0.0 0.2645 0.26 UNIT 330 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-020-000 Non Residential A 72.04 136.71 0.0 0.2707 0.27 UNIT 300 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-021-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOBBY COMMON AREA N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-022-000 Non Residential A 181.88 345.14 0.0 0.6834 0.68 UNIT 110 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-023-000 Non Residential A 65.98 125.20 0.0 0.2479 0.25 UNIT 180 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-026-000 Non Residential A 46.94 89.09 0.0 0.1764 0.18 UNIT 200 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-027-000 Non Residential A 207.12 393.01 0.0 0.7782 0.78 UNIT 270 BLG B 1ST AMNDED N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-028-000 Non Residential A 68.80 130.55 0.0 0.2585 0.26 UNIT 290 BLG B 1ST AMNDED N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO Willdan Financial Services Page 3 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
456-300-029-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOBBY COMMON AREA N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-030-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOBBY COMMON AREA 1ST AMDED SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-031-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - UNIT 190 STORAGE AMNDED CONDO SUNRISE PROF CEN 456-300-032-000 Non Residential A 115.82 219.79 0.0 0.4352 0.44 UNIT350 AMENDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-330-001-000 Non Residential A 130.44 247.51 0.0 0.4901 0.49 POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-002-000 Non Residential A 121.46 230.49 0.0 0.4564 0.46 POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-003-000 Non Residential A 193.04 366.30 0.0 0.7253 0.73 POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-004-000 Non Residenital A - - 0.0 0.0000 - POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-005-000 Non Residenital A - - 0.0 0.0000 - POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-006-000 Non Residenital A - - 0.0 0.0000 - POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 459-010-001-000 Non Residential A 2,007.08 3,808.41 0.0 7.5410 7.54 7.5 AC PAR A PMOR 25-64 459-010-002-000 Non Residential A 1,982.86 3,762.45 0.0 7.4500 7.45 7.5 AC PAR B PMOR 25-64 459-010-003-000 Non Residential A 1,250.92 2,373.63 0.0 4.7000 4.70 4.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-43 459-010-007-000 Non Residential A 692.26 1,313.57 0.0 2.6010 2.60 2.6 AC PAR 2 PMOR 25-70 459-010-012-000 Non Residential A 657.40 1,247.42 0.0 2.4700 2.47 2.5 AC PAR 14 DOUGLAS CENTER PH 1 S-98 459-010-019-000 Non Residential A 1,008.72 1,914.05 0.0 3.7900 3.79 3.8 AC PAR 1 DOUGLAS CENTER PHASE 2 T-32 459-010-026-000 Non Residential A 496.30 941.72 0.0 1.8647 1.86 1.9 AC POR PAR 4 & 5 DOUGLAS CENTER PHASE 2 T-32 459-010-028-000 Non Residential A 705.26 1,338.22 0.0 2.6498 2.65 2.7 AC LT 9 T-32&POR LT 5 DOUGLAS CENTER PH 1 S-98 459-010-030-000 Non Residential A 201.48 382.31 0.0 0.7570 0.76 PAR 1 PMOR T-94 459-010-031-000 Non Residential A 213.68 405.49 0.0 0.8029 0.80 PAR 2 PMOR T-94 459-010-040-000 Non Residential A 1,484.86 2,817.49 0.0 5.5789 5.58 5.5 AC PAR 13 DOUGLAS CENTER PH 3 U-89 459-010-041-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 1.3 AC POR PAR A PMOR T-64 & PAR 8 DGLS CEN PHS-98 459-010-044-000 Non Residential A 2,537.78 4,815.38 0.0 9.5349 9.53 9.3AC PAR10 - 12 DOUGLAS CEN P 3 & POR P2 - 4 PH 2 459-010-047-000 Non Residential A 430.10 816.12 0.0 1.6160 1.62 1.6 AC PAR A PMOR 30-17 459-010-048-000 Non Residential A 752.68 1,428.22 0.0 2.8280 2.83 2.8 AC PAR B PMOR 30-17 459-010-049-000 Non Residential A 2,056.70 3,902.54 0.0 7.7274 7.73 7.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 31-95 459-010-050-000 Non Residential A 1,656.02 3,142.28 0.0 6.2220 6.22 6.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 31-95 459-010-051-000 Non Residential A 1,869.72 3,547.76 0.0 7.0249 7.02 7.0AC PAR3 PM 31-95 SBE# 2745-31-11,SBE 135-31-122 459-010-052-000 Non Residential A 1,923.14 3,649.12 0.0 7.2256 7.23 7.2 AC PAR 4 PMOR 31-95 459-010-053-000 Non Residential A 457.46 868.04 0.0 1.7188 1.72 1.8 AC PAR 1 PMOR 35-17 459-010-054-000 Non Residential A 482.88 916.27 0.0 1.8143 1.81 1.9 AC PAR 2 PMOR 35-17 459-020-001-000 Non Residential A 205.06 389.12 0.0 0.7705 0.77 PAR 1 BLDG 1 LAVA RIDGE PROF CEN S-102 459-020-003-000 Non Residential A 162.66 308.67 0.0 0.6112 0.61 PAR 3 BLDG 3 LAVA RIDGE PROF CEN S-102 459-020-006-000 Non Residential A 72.06 136.76 0.0 0.2708 0.27 UNIT 1 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 459-020-007-000 Non Residential A 84.94 161.20 0.0 0.3192 0.32 UNIT 2 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 459-020-008-000 Non Residential A 38.50 73.08 0.0 0.1447 0.14 UNIT 3 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 459-020-009-000 Non Residential A 30.20 57.32 0.0 0.1135 0.11 UNIT 4 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 459-020-010-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - BUILDING COMMON AREA 459-030-001-000 Non Residential A 166.88 316.65 0.0 0.6270 0.63 PAR 4 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 459-030-002-000 Non Residential A 166.88 316.65 0.0 0.6270 0.63 PAR 5 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 459-030-003-000 Non Residential A 265.62 504.02 0.0 0.9980 1.00 PAR 6 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 Willdan Financial Services Page 4 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-030-004-000 Non Residential A 175.12 332.31 0.0 0.6580 0.66 PAR 7 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 459-030-006-000 Non Residential A 227.56 431.80 0.0 0.8550 0.86 PAR 1 PMOR 29-147 459-030-007-000 Non Residential A 247.52 469.67 0.0 0.9300 0.93 PAR 2 PMOR 29-147 459-030-008-000 Non Residential A 227.56 431.80 0.0 0.8550 0.86 PAR 3 PMOR 29-147 459-040-001-000 Non Residential A 214.68 407.35 0.0 0.8066 0.81 PAR 1 PMOR 29-054 459-040-002-000 Non Residential A 180.66 342.81 0.0 0.6788 0.68 PAR 2 PMOR 29-054 459-040-003-000 Non Residential A 243.36 461.80 0.0 0.9144 0.91 PAR 3 PMOR 29-054 459-040-004-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 1.8 AC PAR A COMMON AREA PMOR 29-054 459-040-005-000 Non Residential A 196.94 373.72 0.0 0.7400 0.74 PAR 1 POR 29-77 459-040-006-000 Non Residential A 196.94 373.72 0.0 0.7400 0.74 PAR 2 POR 29-77 459-040-007-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 1.1 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-77 COMMON AREA 459-040-008-000 Non Residential A 134.66 255.54 0.0 0.5060 0.51 PAR 1 PMOR 29-146 459-040-009-000 Non Residential A 146.90 278.77 0.0 0.5520 0.55 PAR 2 PMOR 29-146 459-040-010-000 Non Residential A 162.34 308.07 0.0 0.6100 0.61 PAR 3 PMOR 29-146 459-040-011-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0000 - 1.0 AC PARCEL A COMMON AREA PMOR 29-146 459-050-001-000 Non Residential A 322.60 612.14 0.0 1.2121 1.21 1.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-87 459-050-002-000 Non Residential A 349.48 663.15 0.0 1.3131 1.31 1.3 AC PAR 4 PMOR 29-87 459-050-003-000 Non Residential A 338.94 643.15 0.0 1.2735 1.27 PAR A1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-004-000 Non Residential A 141.50 268.52 0.0 0.5317 0.53 PAR A2 PMOR 29-122 459-050-005-000 Non Residential A 338.94 643.15 0.0 1.2735 1.27 PAR A3 PMOR 29-122 459-050-007-000 Non Residential A 217.54 412.81 0.0 0.8174 0.82 PAR B1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-008-000 Non Residential A 107.86 204.69 0.0 0.4053 0.41 PAR B2 PMOR 29-122 459-050-009-000 Non Residential A 137.40 260.75 0.0 0.5163 0.52 PAR B3 PMOR 29-122 459-050-011-000 Non Residential A 323.56 613.96 0.0 1.2157 1.22 PAR C1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-012-000 Non Residential A 323.54 613.91 0.0 1.2156 1.22 PAR C2 PMOR 29-122 459-050-014-000 Non Residential A 705.28 1,338.27 0.0 2.6499 2.65 EUREKA RD 1544 STE 140 ROS PAR D1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-016-000 Non Residential A 808.78 1,534.68 0.0 3.0388 3.04 PAR 'A1' PMOR 29-142 459-050-018-000 Non Residential A 808.78 1,534.68 0.0 3.0388 3.04 PAR 'B1' PMOR 29-142 459-050-020-000 Non Residential A 936.46 1,776.94 0.0 3.5185 3.52 PAR 'C1' PMOR 29-142 459-070-001-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 1 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-002-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 2 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-003-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 3 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-004-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 4 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-005-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 5 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-006-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 6 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-007-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 7 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-008-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 8 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-009-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 9 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-010-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 10 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-011-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 11 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-012-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 12 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 Willdan Financial Services Page 5 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-070-013-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 13 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-014-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 14 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-015-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 15 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-016-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 16 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-017-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 17 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-018-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 18 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-019-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 19 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-020-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 20 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-021-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 21 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-022-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 22 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-023-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 23 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-024-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 24 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-025-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 25 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-026-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 26 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-027-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 27 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-028-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 28 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-029-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 29 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-030-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 30 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-031-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 31 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-032-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 32 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-033-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 33 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-034-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 34 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-035-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 35 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-036-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 36 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-037-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 37 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-038-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 38 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-039-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 39 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-040-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 40 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-041-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 41 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-042-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 42 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-043-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 43 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-044-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 44 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-045-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 45 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-046-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 46 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-047-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 47 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-048-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 48 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-049-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 49 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-050-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 50 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-051-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 51 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-052-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 52 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-053-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 53 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 Willdan Financial Services Page 6 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-070-054-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 54 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-055-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 55 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-056-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 56 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-057-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 57 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-058-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT C COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-059-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT D COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-060-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT E COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-061-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT F COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-062-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT G COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-063-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT H COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-064-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT M COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-065-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT O COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-070-066-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT P COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-001-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 58 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-002-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 59 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-003-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 60 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-004-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 61 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-005-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 62 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-006-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 63 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-007-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 64 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-008-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 65 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-009-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 66 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-010-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 67 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-011-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 68 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-012-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 69 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-013-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 70 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-014-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 71 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-015-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 72 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-016-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 73 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-017-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 74 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-018-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 75 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-019-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 76 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-020-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 77 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-021-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 78 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-022-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 79 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-023-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 80 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-024-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 81 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-025-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 82 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-026-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 83 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-027-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 84 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-028-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 85 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 Willdan Financial Services Page 7 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-080-029-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 86 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-030-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 89 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-031-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 90 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-032-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 91 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-033-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 92 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-034-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 93 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-035-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 94 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-036-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 95 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-037-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 96 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-038-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 97 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-039-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 98 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-040-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 99 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-041-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 100 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-042-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 101 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-043-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 102 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-044-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 103 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-045-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 104 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-046-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 105 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-047-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 106 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-048-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 107 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-049-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 108 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-050-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 109 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-051-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 110 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-052-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 111 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-053-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 112 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-054-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 113 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-055-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 114 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-056-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 115 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-057-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 116 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-058-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 117 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-059-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 118 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-060-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 119 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-061-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 120 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-062-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 121 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-063-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 122 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-064-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 123 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-065-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 124 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-066-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 125 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-067-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 126 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-068-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 127 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-069-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 128 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 Willdan Financial Services Page 8 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-080-070-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 129 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-071-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 130 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-072-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 131 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-073-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 132 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-074-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT I COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-075-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT J COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-076-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT K COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-077-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT L COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-080-078-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - POR LOT N COM AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-090-001-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 1 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-002-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 2 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-003-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 3 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-004-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 4 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-005-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 5 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-006-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 6 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-007-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 7 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-008-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 8 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-009-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 9 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-010-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 10 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-011-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 11 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-012-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 12 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-013-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 13 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-014-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 14 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-015-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 15 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-016-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 16 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-017-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 17 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-018-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 18 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-019-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 19 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-020-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 20 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-021-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 21 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-022-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 22 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-023-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 23 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-024-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 24 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-025-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 25 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-026-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 26 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-027-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 27 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-028-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 28 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-029-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 29 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-030-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 30 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-031-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 31 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-032-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 32 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 Willdan Financial Services Page 9 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-090-033-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 33 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-034-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 34 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-035-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 35 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-036-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 36 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-037-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 37 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-038-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 38 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-039-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 39 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-040-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 40 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-041-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 41 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-042-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 42 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-043-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 43 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-044-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 44 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-045-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 45 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-046-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 46 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-047-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 47 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-048-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 48 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-049-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 49 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-050-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 50 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-051-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 51 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-052-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 52 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-053-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 53 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-054-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 54 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-055-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 87 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-090-056-000 SF A 266.14 505.03 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 88 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-090-057-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT B COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-058-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT C COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-059-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT D COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-060-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT E COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-061-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - POR LOT N COM AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 MOR DD-3 459-090-062-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT 10A PARK STONE POINT LARGE LOT SUBD MOR CC-94 459-090-063-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0000 - LOT 10B PARK STONE POINT LARGE LOT SUBD MOR CC-94 460-160-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 10 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 Willdan Financial Services Page 10 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-160-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-021-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-022-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-023-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-024-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-025-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-026-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-027-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-028-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-029-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-030-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-031-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-032-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-033-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-034-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-035-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-036-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-037-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-038-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-039-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-040-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-041-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-042-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-043-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-044-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-045-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-046-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-047-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-048-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-049-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-050-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-051-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 Willdan Financial Services Page 11 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-160-052-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-053-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-054-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-055-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-056-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-057-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-058-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-059-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-021-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-022-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-023-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-024-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-025-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-026-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-027-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-028-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-029-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-030-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-031-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-032-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-033-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 Willdan Financial Services Page 12 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-170-034-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-035-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-036-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-037-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-038-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-039-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-040-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-041-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-180-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 10 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-021-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-022-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-023-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-024-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-025-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-026-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-027-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-028-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-029-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-030-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-031-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-032-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-033-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A Willdan Financial Services Page 13 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-180-034-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-035-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-036-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-037-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-038-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-039-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-040-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-041-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-042-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-043-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-044-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-045-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-046-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-047-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-048-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-049-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-050-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-051-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-052-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-053-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-054-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-055-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-056-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-190-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 Willdan Financial Services Page 14 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-190-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-021-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-022-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-023-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-024-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-025-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-026-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-027-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-028-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-029-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-030-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-031-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-032-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-033-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-034-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-035-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-036-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-037-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-038-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-039-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-040-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-041-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-042-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-043-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-044-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-045-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 101 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-046-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 102 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-047-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 103 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-048-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 104 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-049-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 105 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-050-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 106 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-051-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 107 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-052-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 108 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-053-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 109 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-054-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 110 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-055-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 111 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-056-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 112 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-057-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 113 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-058-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 114 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 461-011-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 Willdan Financial Services Page 15 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-011-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-011-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-011-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-011-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-021-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-022-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-023-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-024-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-025-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-026-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-027-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-028-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-029-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-030-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-031-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-032-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-033-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-034-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-035-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-036-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-037-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-038-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-039-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-040-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 Willdan Financial Services Page 16 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-012-041-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-042-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-043-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-044-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMEDNED) T-38 461-012-045-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-046-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-047-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-048-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-049-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-050-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-051-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-052-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-053-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-054-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-055-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-056-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-057-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-058-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-059-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-060-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-061-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-062-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-063-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-064-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-065-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-066-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-067-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-068-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-069-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-070-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-071-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-072-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-073-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-074-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-075-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-076-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-077-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-078-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-081-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOTS 10 & 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-082-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 POR LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 Willdan Financial Services Page 17 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-013-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS # 4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 101 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 102 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 103 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-021-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 104 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-022-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 105 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-023-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 106 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 3 MOR T-39 461-013-024-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 107 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-025-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 108 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-026-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 109 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-027-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 110 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-028-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 111 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-029-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 112 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-030-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 113 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-031-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 114 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-032-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 115 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-033-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 116 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-034-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 117 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-035-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 118 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-036-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 119 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-037-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 120 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 4 T-12 461-013-038-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 121 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-021-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Willdan Financial Services Page 18 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-021-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 101 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 102 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 103 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 104 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 105 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 106 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 107 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 108 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Willdan Financial Services Page 19 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-023-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 109 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 110 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 111 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 112 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 113 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 114 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 115 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 116 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 117 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 118 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 119 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 120 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 121 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 122 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 123 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 124 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 125 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 126 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 127 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 128 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 129 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 130 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 131 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 132 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 133 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 134 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-001-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-002-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-003-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-004-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-005-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-006-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-007-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-008-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-009-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-010-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 10 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-011-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-012-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-013-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-014-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-015-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Willdan Financial Services Page 20 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-025-016-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-017-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-018-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-019-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-020-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-021-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-022-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-023-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-024-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-025-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-026-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-027-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-028-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-029-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-030-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-031-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-032-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-033-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-034-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-035-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-036-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-037-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-038-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-039-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-040-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-041-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-042-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-043-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-044-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-045-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-046-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-047-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-048-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-049-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-050-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-051-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-052-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-053-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-054-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-055-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-056-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Willdan Financial Services Page 21 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-025-057-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-058-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-059-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-060-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-061-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-062-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-063-000 SF Residential D 169.82 169.83 1.0 0.0000 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 868
LEVIED PARCELS 826
CHARGE $270,253.38
MAXIMUM ASMT $441,488.12
SF UNITS 654
NON-RES ACREAGE 530.8045
EBU 1,184.8045
Willdan Financial Services Page 22 of 22
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-176

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prep are and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 RESOLUTION NO. 23-176

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-176 was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-177

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District” ), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2023/2024, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance, operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance, operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for landscape, lighting, streetscape and hardscape areas, including monuments, landmark and gateway features, bulb-outs, walls, fencing, signage, special lighting, paving, transit facilities, ground cover, shrubs, plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District. The District is known and designated as:

“Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District”

Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Report.

District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously authorized by City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 5 Public H earing(s): The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give no tice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing the publishing of this Resolution once in a local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board cust omarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 23-177

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-177 was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-178

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report” ) for the district known and designated as the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Hi ghways Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the ass essments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and,

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and,

WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each a nd all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY TH E

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:

a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District
2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 23-178

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-178 was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510

www.willdan.com

City of Roseville

Riverside Avenue
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2023/24 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: May 3, 2023
Public Hearing: June 7, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION ......................................... 1 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES .............................................. 2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT ................................. 2 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE .......... 4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...................................................................... 6 A. GENERAL ............................................................................................................ 6 B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS ....................................................................... 6 C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 8 D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA ................................................................ 9 III. DISTRICT BUDGET .......................................................................................... 11 A. FY 2023/24 BUDGET ..................................................................................... 11 B. FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT RATES ............................................................ 12 C. FY 2023/24 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION .......................................... 12 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ............................................................ 12 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ........ 17 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ........................................................ 18 APPENDIX B — FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT ROLL .............................................. 20

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed in January of 2007 and is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”).

The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District, any new annexations, changes to the District, and the proposed assessme nts for the period of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024. The special benefit assessments are based on historical and estimated costs to maintain the District improvements. These assessments, which provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District, will provide funding for the operation and maintenance of District improvements.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Placer County Assessor’s Office. The Placer County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Tax Code Accounts, to identify on the County’s tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.

Following approval of the Report, the C ity Council will, by resolution , order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2023/24. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
The City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, beginning with Section 22500 (the “1972 Act”); Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”); and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, beginning with Government Code Section 53750 (the “Implementation Act”) (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”) initiated proceedings for the

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 formation of the District on November 15, 2006 and to levy and collect annual assessments against lots and pa rcels within the District for FY 2007/08. On January 17, 2007, pursuant to Assessment Law, the City conducted a Public Hearing and tabulated the returned ballots. The City determined that a majority protest did not exist and approved the District’s maximu m assessment rate and annual inflationary adjustment factor.

Pursuant to the 1972 Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls. The assessments described in this Report have been prepared in accordance with the1972 Act and Assessment Law.

C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The proposed territory within the District consi sts of all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land as shown on the Boundary Map titled “Boundary Map of Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District” contained within this report in Appendix A-1.

The District is bounded by Douglas Boulevard to the north, Darling Way to the south and includes parcels that front Riverside Avenue. It is centrally located between Interstate 80 and Downtown Roseville and is east of the Union Pacific Railroad.

The District currently has a mix of different types of land uses including automotive related retail and car lots, community/neighborhood retail, offices, services, and residential units.

D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and othe r ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maint enance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fer tilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Furthermore, the 1972 Act specifies tha t where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the governing body may choo se to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any avai lable and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
The District, through the levy of special assessments, is to provide funding for ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements located within the public rights -of-ways and dedicated easements located within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, all materials, equipment, utilities, labor, and appurtenant facilities related to the ongoing maintenance of the improvements. The improvements to be maintained and services are generally described as follows:

Landscaping Improvements

The general landscaping improvements in the District are to be consistent with the improvements on Vernon Street located north of the District, which intersects Riverside Avenue. As a gateway to downtown Roseville, Riverside Avenue ’s compatibility with Vernon Street links the downtown area and Riverside Gateway area together.

The landscaping improvements have been designed to enhance the area within the District and may include, but are not limited to ground cover, shrubs and plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, ornamental lighting, masonry walls or other fencing, hardscape improvements, monuments and landmarks, mid -block bulbs, bulb-outs, and associated appurtenant located within the street rights-of-way and public areas within the District. Specifically, the proposed landscape improvement areas for this District are:
• Landscaping and hardscape improvements within the public rights-of-way of the streets within the District including, but not limited to, Riverside Avenue including the corners of Riverside Avenue and Second Street, Third Street, Fourth Street, Fifth Street, Sixth Street, Darling Way, Fern Street, Cherry Street, and Bonita Street.
• Decorative banners along Riverside Avenue.
• Transit facilities include bus stop seating and decorative shelters. • Roundabout improvements including plantings, paving, and landmark feature located at the intersection of Vernon St., Douglas Blvd., and Riverside Ave. • A Gateway feature located at the intersection of Darling Way and Riversid e Avenue.
• Various amenities associated with the landscape improvements and public areas within the District, including, but not limited to, trash receptacles, street furniture, bike racks, entry signs, sidewalks, fencing, and retaining walls.

Specifically, not included as District improvements are those improvements located on private property, improvements and facilities that are outside the boundaries of the District and/or area funded by other sources available to the City.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 Public Lighting Improvements

The lighting improvements may include, but are not limited to, the cost of providing, maintaining, and servicing of lighting fixtures, poles, meters, conduits, electrical cable, and associated appurtenant facilities associated with:
• Lighting facilities within the landscaped areas and public areas including safety lights, security lights or ornamental lights installed as part of the District improvements; and
• Public street light improvements located on the streets within the District.

Specifically excluded from the assessment are the street light energy costs.

These costs are to be paid for by the City from other revenue sources.

Detailed maps and descriptions of the location and extent of the specific improvements to be maintained by the District are on file in the Office of Public Works and by reference are made part of this Report.

Description of Maintenance and Services

Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and ser vicing of landscaping and street lighting improvements facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping and street lighting improvements, or appurtenant facilities; providing for the l ife, growth, health and beauty of landscaping improvements including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, mowing, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning sand blasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Servicing means the furnishing of water and electricity for the irrigation of the landscape improvements or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation of the landscaping improvements or appurtenant facilities. The street lighting improvements shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination; however, the City will be paying the actual energy costs of the streetlights.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

A. GENERAL
The Implementation Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping improvements, streetlights, and traffic signals.

Streets and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than the assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formu la or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
In addition, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act require that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost for the proportional special benefit conferred to that parcel. Article XIIID and the Implementation Act further provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. They also require that publicly owned properties that specifically benefit from the improvements be assessed.

B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service;”
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over, and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large .

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.” This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments. These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.

The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the District as well as provide for the annual maintenance of those improvements, and the assessment revenues generated by District will be used solely for such purposes.

The costs of the proposed improvements have been identified and allocated to properties within the District based on special benefit . The improvements to be provided by this District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as an essential component and local amenity that provides a direct reflection and exten sion of the properties within the District which the property owners and residents have expressed a high level of support.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) set forth in the Report is based on the premise that each assessed property receives special benefits from the landscape and lighting improvements within the District, and the assessment obligation for each parcel reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefits as compared to other properties that receive special benefits.

To identify and determine the proportional special benefit to each parcel within the District, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements provided as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. The improvements and the associated costs described in this Report, have been carefully reviewed and have been identified and allocated based on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of only those improvements determined to be of special benefit to properties within the District. The various public improvements and the associated costs have been identified as either “general benefit” (not assessed) or “special benefit.”
Proper maintenance and operation of parkway landscaping and streetlights provides special benefit to adjacent properties by providing community character, security, safety, and vitality. In addition, these improvements will enhance the ability of property owners to attract and maintain customers as well as increase the viability of commercial development.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 Landscaping Special Benefit

Landscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade, and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. Specifically , they provide a sense of ownership and a common theme in the community providing aesthetic appeal and increased desirability of properties.

Landscaping provides special benefit to those developments that are directly adjacent to the public streets.

Landscaping General Benefit

The Improvements were installed to directly benefit the property owners in the District to enhance business and development opportunities. Therefore, it has been determined that there are no general benefits associated with the landscaping improvements.

Lighting Special Benefit

The operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting along local streets and arterial streets of a development provide the following special benefits:
• Improved security of lots and parcels along the perimeter of the development;
• Improved nighttime visibility for the local access of emergency vehicles; and • Improved safety and traffic circulation to and from parcels.

Street Lights General Benefit

Similar to the landscaping improvements described above, the Improvements were installed to directly benefit the property owners in the District to enhance business and development opportunities. Therefore, it has been determined that there are no general benefits associated with lighting improvements.

C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within the District, a formula that spreads the costs of the maintenance based on the special benefit must be established. The improvements have been reviewed and a formula has been established to apportion the maintenance costs based on benefit.

The method of assessment is based on the front footage of each parcel located within the District. The parcel’s Front Footage was determined based on Assessor Parcel maps or other sources. Only Front Footage on Riverside Avenue was used.

Based on the above formula, the FY 2007/08 maximum assessment rate approved on January 17, 2007 through a property owner balloting (the “Initial

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 Assessment Rate” or the “Base Year Maximum Assessment Rate”) is $6 .45 per each foot of frontage.

The following formulas were used to first calculate the District’s Initial Assessment Rate and then each parcel’s FY 2007/08 assessment (proportional benefit):

Step 1:

Balance to Levy ÷ Total Front Footage =
Maximum Front Footage Rate

Step 2:

Parcel Front Footage x Maximum Front Footage Rate =
Maximum Assessment

The Total Front Footage was the sum of all the Front Feet within the District. The Initial Assessment Rate per Front Foot was established by taking the total cost of improvements (Balance to Levy) and dividing that amount by the Total Front Footage within the District. The Initial Assessment Rate per Front Foot, which is also the FY 2007/08 Maximum Front Footage Rate, is then app lied back to each individual parcel’s Front Footage to determine the parcel’s proportionate special benefit and assessment obligation (The FY 2007/08 Maximum Assessment).

D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
The purpose of establishing an Assessment Range Formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessment rates without requiring the District to go through the requirements of Proposition 218 in order to get a small increase in assessments. This District provides for an annual adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rate of the lesser of the percentage change in the area’s Local Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, which is currently the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (the “CPI”) or three percent (3%) (the “Escalation Percentage”).

The CPI in this adjustment shall be determined through CPI data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics from Dec ember to December, beginning with the period from December 2006 to December 2007.

In applying this year’s inflationary adjustment , the Escalation Percentage will increase the FY 2023/24 maximum assessment rate by 3% over that of the prior year.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 The Assessment Range Formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District beginning in fiscal year 2008/09. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment rate for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum A ssessment Rate, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The Maximum Assessment Rate is equal to the FY 2007/08 Maximum Assessment Rate, which was approved on January 17, 2007 through a property owner balloting (the “I nitial Assessment Rate” or “Base Year Assessment Rate”) and adjusted annually by the Escalation Percentage.

Beginning in the second fiscal year (Fiscal Year 2008/09) and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment Rate would be recalculated, and a new Maximum Assessment Rate established within the District.

The Maximum Assessment Rate is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

Although the Maximum Assessment Rate will increase each year, the actual assessment rate may remain unchanged. The Maximum Assessment Rate adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. The Maximum Assessment Rate calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase in the annual assessment rate and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjusted maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate, then the re quired budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to balloting.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2023/24 BUDGET

Fund balance information is reported in Section C on the following page.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 B. FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT RATES

C. FY 2023/24 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS

Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS

Contract Maintenance - Landscaping - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping improvements,

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 irrigation, and related drainage systems, as well as mai ntenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

Repair & Maintenance - Landscaping - This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance – Lighting - This line item includes bulb replacement and repairs that are generally unforeseen. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance - Streetscape/Signage - This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance – Tree Work - This line item includes annual costs for tree maintenance not included in the annual contract maintenance portion of the budget. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for th e operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures - Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserv e Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year that were previously funded or accumulated in the Rehabilitation Reserve. The Rehabilitation Reserve is used to accumul ate funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation or replacement of District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

ADMINISTRATION COSTS

Contract Administration – Park’s Dept – Estimated Costs of Par k and Recreation Department staff to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 and overall repair and maintenance of the District. This amount also includes the cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.

County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Consulting and Professional Services – Includes the costs and expenses of contracting with various professionals to provide legal, engineering and district administration services directly related to the District, including the calculation of the annual assessment amounts and the preparation of the Engineer’s’ Report.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out of pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

Contribution for /(Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

BALANCE TO LEVY - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current fiscal yea r for each zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the total District costs together with any applicable adjustments to the budget as described above.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 ASSESSMENT RATES:

Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels that are expected to be assessed. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government -owned land, public utility-owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District currently do not benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.

Total Assessable Front Footage - The total amount of assessable Front Footage within the District in accordance with the Method of Assessment Section of this Report.

Applied Assessment Rate - The assessment rate to be applied to the front footage of each non-exempt parcel within the District for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Assessment Rate - The Maximum Assessment Rate per front foot for the current fiscal year.

Potential Maximum Assessment – The total amount that can be assessed against all non-exempt District parcels for the current fiscal year based upon the expected assessable front footage within the District.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

OPERATING RESERVE

Replenish from FY 2023/24 Levy – This amount is added to the FY 2023/24 levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six -month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Operating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from the period of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2023/24 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund FY 2023/24 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve may be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operat ing Reserve Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Acco rdingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

REHABILITATION RESERVE

Collect from FY 2023/24 Levy — This amount is added to the levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabi litation projects, replacements, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2023/24 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies expected to be transferred out of the Rehabilitation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17 funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

The Report provides a five -year Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) which shows projected expenditures related to the rehabilitation, restoration and/or replacement of District improvements, and other allowable costs. The Current Fiscal Year CIP is shown in the preceding Budget Section A. The projected CIP costs for the remaining four years are shown in the table below.

From time to time, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing needs due to the condition of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the District’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and/or operation of the improvements.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP

The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report. These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a summary of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19

FY 2023/24 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20 APPENDIX B — FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT ROLL

Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

A listing of parcels to be assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, shall be submitted to the City Clerk, under separate cover, and by reference is made part of this Report.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include area s of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights -of-ways including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-ways; common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempt from assessment.

At the conclusion of th e public hearing for the District and the proposed assessments, approval of the Report (as submitted or as modified) confirms the method of apportionment and the assessment rate to be levied against each eligible parcel and thereby constitutes the approved levy and collection of assessments for FY 2023/24. The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2023/24 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submi tted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the Current Fiscal Year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The asse ssment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-179

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION S OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 RESOLUTION NO. 23-179

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-179 was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-180

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District” ), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2023/2024, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance, operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District. The District is known and designated as:

“Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District”

Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Report.

District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District an d do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously authorized by City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 5 Public Heari ng(s): The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing the publishing of this Resolution once in a local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customar ily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon the reafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 23-180

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-180 was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-181

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report” ) for the district known and designated as the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highw ays Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assess ments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and,

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Co uncil the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY TH E

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passag e and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 23-181

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2023.

,
Mayor
City of Roseville

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-181 was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510

www.willdan.com
City of Roseville

Vernon Street
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2023/24 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: May 3, 2023
Public Hearing: June 7, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW .................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION .................................1 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ...............................................2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT .................................2 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE ...........4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .................................................................. 5 A. GENERAL ............................................................................................................5 B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS ..........................................................................................5 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .......................8 D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT .....................................................9 E. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATION ..............................................................10 F. DETERMINATION OF FRONT FOOTAGE ..................................................10 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ...................................................................................... 11 A. FY 2023/24 BUDGET ......................................................................................11 B. FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT RATES .............................................................12 C. FY 2023/24 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION ...........................................12 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ............................................................12 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN .........17 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ........................................................ 18 APPENDIX B — FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT ROLL .............................................. 20

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed in January of 2001 and is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”).

The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District, any new annexations, changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024. The special benefit assessments are based on historical and estimated costs to maintain the District improvements. These assessments, which provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District, will provide funding for the operation and maintenance of District improvements.

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will by resolution , order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2023/24. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION
All assessments described in this Report and appro ved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218).

The District has been formed pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Pursuant

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 to the Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approvin g the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls.

The assessments described in this Report have been prepared in accordance with the Act.

Prior to FY 2001/02, the City initiated (Resolution 00-523) and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings (Resolution 01 -22) in accordance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution (“Article XIIID”) for the parcels within the District.

An annual rate escalator was also included in the ballot that allows for an annual inflationary increase equal to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area (the “CPI”) of each succeeding year (the “Escalation Percentage”). At the conclusion of the Public Hearing held on January 17, 2001, all property owner ballots returned were tabulated to determine if majority protest existed. The result of the protest proceeding was an approval of the assessment rate and the annual inflationary increase for maintaining the improvements within the District.

Pursuant to the Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls.

C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES

The District is located in downtown Roseville and includes all parcels that front along Vernon Street between Folsom Road and the Riverside/Douglas Boulevard.

See Appendix A for District boundary map.

D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT

As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or whi ch are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Furthermore, the 1972 Act specifies that where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the governing body may choose to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any available and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
The District ensures the continued maintenance, servicing, administration and operation of various landscape, lighting and streetscape imp rovements and associated appurtenances that are required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. The assessable parcels receive benefit from the above improvements within the District.

Specific improvements include i nstallation, maintenance and servicing of public facilities, including, but not limited to street trees, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking stripes, turf, brick pavers, planters, gateways, benches, bike racks, signage, trash receptacles, and lighting throu ghout the boundaries of the District (the “Improvements’).

As applied herein, “installation” means the construction of public Improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage, lights, equipment, turf, brick pavers, planters, gateways, benches, bike racks and signage.

“Maintenance” means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any Improvement, including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, f ertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste, and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of Improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

“Servicing” means the furnishing of electric current , or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other Improvements; or water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other Improvements.

Plans and specification for the Improvements to be maintained are on file in the office of the Economic and Community Services Director at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678.

All assessable parcels identified as being within the District share in both the cost and the benefits of the improvements. The costs associated with the Improvements are equitably spread among all benefiting parcels within the District.

Only parcels that receive direct benefit from the Improvements are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. The funds collected are dispersed and used for only the services and operation provided to the District.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

A. GENERAL

The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amo unt among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the Improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel.

B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or p roperty-related service”;
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments. These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.

The costs of the proposed improvements have been identified and allocated to properties within the District based on special benefit. The improvements to be provided by this District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as an essential component and local amenity that provides a direct reflection and extension of the properties within the District which the property owners and residents have expressed a high level of support.

To identify and determine the proportional special benefit to each parcel within the District, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements provided as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. The improvements and the associated costs described in this Report, have been carefully reviewed and have been identified and allocated base d on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of only those improvements determined to be of special benefit to properties within the District. The various public improvements and the associated costs have been identif ied as either “general benefit” (not assessed) or “special benefit”. The City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with Article XIIID. Each of the proposed Improvements, the associated costs and assessments were identified and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID and 1972 Act. Additionally, the Improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the Improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.

The City annually levies and collects special benefit assessments in order to maintain and service the District Improvements. The District provides for specific Improvements and services that include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and lighting Improvements and associated appurtenances located within the District’s public right s-of-way and dedicated easements. The annual assessment is based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the Improvements that provide a benef it to properties within these Districts. The

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 Improvements within the District and the costs of those Improvements are identified and budgeted separately, including all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves.

All Improvements within the District and the properties associated with those Improvements were reviewed for benefit prior to the formation of the District.

Because the Improvements affront the benefited parcels, it has been determined that there is no measurable general benefit to p roperties outside the District or to the public at large. In making this determination it should be noted that similar improvements within California are typically maintained by individual property owners, through some type of association or a special district as allowed by State Law since the on-going maintenance of these improvements are a special benefit to the properties associated with those improvements.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) for the District is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the District receives special benefit from the Improvements maintained and financed by District assessments.

The presence of these Improvements and the close proximity of the Improvements to the properties within the Dis trict enhance the desirability and security of properties within the District.

The landscape Improvements provided by the District may include landscaped parkways, perimeters, entryways, local medians, slopes, internal amenities and appurtenant facilities. Street lighting Improvements may include all energy costs and necessary maintenance to the facilities related thereto. The annual assessments outlined in this Report are proposed to cover the estimated costs to provide all necessary service, operation, administration, and maintenance required to keep these Improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. The special benefits associated with the local landscaping Improvements are specifically:

The special benefits associated with all landscaping Improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the Improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced adaptation of th e urban environment within the natural environment from adequate landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained Improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained landscaped areas.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 • Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well -maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise.

The special benefits of street lighting are the convenience, safety, and security of property, improvements, and goods. Specifically:
• Enhanced deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection. • Increased nighttime safety on streets and roads within the Districts. • Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved ingress and egress to property.
• Reduced vandalism and other criminal acts and damage to Improvements or property.
• Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased promotion of business during nighttime ho urs in the case of commercial properties.

All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District.

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the costs of the District may be app ortioned by any formula or method that fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed, among all assessable parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the Improvements. The special benefit formula used should reflect the composition of the parcels, the Improvements and services provided to fairly proportion the costs based on estimated special benefit to each parcel within the District. All assessable parcels within the District sh all receive a direct special benefit from the services and Improvements provided by the District.

Article XIIID of the California Constitution specifies that only special benefits are assessable and that the City must separate the general benefits from t he special benefits conferred on any parcel. Since the District is a downtown business area and the Improvements that affront each District parcel primarily attract and retain an increased customer base, these benefits enhance the District parcels and there is no measurable benefit to the public at large. Therefore, 100% of the Improvements are considered special benefit to the District parcels. The cost of

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 maintaining the Improvements is therefore identified as special benefit and has been allocated to the special assessments.

It was determined that a uniform assessment rate per foot of frontage upon Vernon Street would fairly distribute the net amount to be assessed due to the following reasons:

1. The assessments are based upon a specific property owne r’s special benefit received from the Improvements.

2. The special benefits should be directly related to the extent at which a property fronts the improvements, relative to other properties in the District.

The base assessment rate for the District was $4.59 per linear foot in FY 2001/02 and was determined using the formula below.

Balance to Levy
Assessment Rate Per Foot =
Total Feet of Frontage

The annual assessment amount for each parcel was then determined using the formula below:

Parcel Front Footage x Rate per Linear Foot = Parcel Assessment Amount

D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT
Commencing with FY 2002/03, the maximum assessment rate is to increase annually by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward (“CPI”) as of January of each succeeding year (the “Escalation Percentage”). Since the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics does not publish a CPI for January; the CPI for preceding month shall be used since this is the CPI available in the month of January. The District’s starting CPI Index of 184.1, December of 2000, is hereby established as the base CPI (the “Base Year CPI Index”).

In applying this year’s CPI increase, the Escalation Percentage will increase the FY 2023/24 maximum assessment rate by 4.88% over that of the prior year.

If the proposed assessment increases over the prior fiscal year by a percentage no greater than the Escalation Percentage as defined above, then the proposed assessment is not considered an increase. This assessment range formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment rate for the Current Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated maximum assessment rate, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 E. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATION
Any property owner, who believes that the assessment levied on the subject property is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of assessm ent, may file a written appeal with the Finance Director of the City of Roseville or his or her designee. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the then current Fiscal Year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or his or her designee will promptly review the appeal and any information provided by the property owner. If the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or hi s or her designee finds that the assessment should be modified, the appropriate changes shall be made to the assessment roll. However, if any such changes are approved after the County of Placer’s deadline for adjustments to the tax roll, the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or his or her designee is authorized to approve a refund of the reduction amount to the property owner. Any dispute over the decision of the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or his or her designee, shall be referred to the City Council of the City of Roseville and the decision of the City Council of the City of Roseville shall be final.

F. DETERMINATION OF FRONT FOOTAGE
The front footage of each assessable parcel is subject to revision and/or correction using measurements of front footage found on the then current Placer County Assessor’s Parcel Maps or through direct measurement by City personnel. Any such correction that increases a Parcel Assessment shall not be considered an increased assessment subject to the procedural provisions of Article XIIID.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET

A. FY 2023/24 BUDGET

Fund balance information is reported in Section C on the following page.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 B. FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT RATES

C. FY 2023/24 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET

DIRECT COSTS

Contract Maintenance - Landscaping - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping corridors, street medians, entryways, irrigation and related drainag e systems as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13

Repair & Maintenance – Landscaping - This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This ma y include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Repair & Maintenance – Lighting - This line item includes bulb replacement and repairs that are generally unforeseen. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance – Tree Work - This line item includes annual costs for tree maintenance not included in the annual contract maintenance portion of the budget. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for th e operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures – Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserv e Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year that were previously funded or accumulated in the Rehabilitation Reserve. The Rehabilitation Reserve is used to accumula te funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation or replacement of District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

ADMINISTRATION COSTS

City Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City Finance Department and other Departments in preparing the annual budget for the Engineer’s Report, together with other financial information required to determine the annual assessment. These costs would a lso include the preparation, posting and publishing of public notices required for City Council action relating to the District , as well as costs to perform legal review of documents.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.

County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Consulting and Professional Services – Includes the costs and expenses of contracting with various professionals to provide legal, engineering and district administration services directly related to the District, including the calculation of the annual assessment amounts and the preparation of the Engineer’s’ Report.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out of pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

Contribution for /(Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANC E INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

ASSESSMENT RATES:

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels that are expected to be assessed. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government -owned land, public utility-owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District currently do not benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.

Total Assessable Front Footage - The total linear footage of that portion of each assessable parcel’s boundary that is contiguous with Vernon Street.

Applied Assessment Rate per Front Foot - This amount represents the rate being applied to the front footage of each parcel for the Current Fiscal Year.

Maximum Assessment Rate per Front Foot - This amount represents the maximum rate that can be applied to the front footage of each parcel for the Current Fiscal Year.

Maximum Potential Assessment – The total amount that is expected to be assessed against all parcels within the District for the Current Fiscal Year.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

OPERATING RESERVE

Beginning Operating Reserve Balance 7 -1-2023 (est.) - The anticipated beginning balance of cash and receivables net of any unpaid prior year obligations for each Zone. These beginning balances shall be used to fund each Zone’s expenditures from July 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023, as the Operating Reserve is required to compensate for the approxi mate six-month delay between the start of the District’s fiscal year and the receipt of the collections from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

Replenish from FY 2023/24 Levy – This amount is added to the FY 2023/24 levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six -month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Operating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from the period of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2023/24 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund FY 2023/24 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve ma y be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operating Reserve Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to re spond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Departmen t or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Operating Reserve Balance 6 -30-2024 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reser ve balance/(deficit) for each Zone as of June 30, 2024. The size of each Zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance, service and incidental expenses from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the Agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each Zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six -months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are received from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

REHABILITATION RESERVE

Collect from FY 2023/24 Levy — This amount is added to the levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2023/24 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies expected to be transferred out of the Rehabilitation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17 order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero , this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Rehab Reserve Balance 6 -30-2024 (est.) - The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of June 30, 2024. These funds shall be used to provide for future year rehabilitation projec ts, replacements, restorations or upgrades of District improvements which cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. Should the District have no Rehabilitation Reserve balances or related activity, no Rehabilitation Reserve information shall be presented in the Report.

From time to time, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing needs due to the condition of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the Districts’ Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and/or operation of the improvements.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP

The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the 1972 Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report. These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a summary of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19

FY 2023/24 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20 APPENDIX B — FY 2023/24 ASSESSMENT ROLL

Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-ways including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-ways; common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

At the conclusion of the public hearing for the District and the proposed assessments, approval of the Report (as submitted or as modified) confirms the method of apportionment and the assessment rate to be levied against each eligible parcel and thereby constitutes the approved levy and collection of assessments for FY 2023/24. The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Audi tor/Controller and included on the FY 2023/24 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the Current Fiscal Year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather t han a proportionate share of the original assessment.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2671
File #:
0900-02
Title:

Environmental Utilities Operations Center Phase 1A Project - Professional Design Services Agreement
Contact:

Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Professional Design Services Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) for the design and environmental documentation for the proposed Environmental Utilities Operations Center Phase 1A in the amount of $2,930,300 and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
To address ongoing growth of the City, and corresponding demands for support facilities needed to provide municipal services, the City is considering a project to design and construct a new Environmental Utilities Operations Center. This facility is proposed to encompass the following buildings, functions, and process equipment:

A. Resource Recovery and Transfer Operations (RRTO).

The RRTO will provide the following services to support EU’s operations through buildout of the City:

Waste Services transfer station.

Organics receiving and pre-processing/transfer building. Sized to meet the SB 1383 requirements.

Self-haul waste receiving, recyclables drop-off and household hazardous waste facility.

Waste Services Material Processing and Waste Transfer Station Facilities.

Gasification and transformation Facilities are being considered as future process functions on this site.

B. Administrative Building
This facility will have administrative offices, crew areas, internal break room, public meeting rooms, large conference room, in-door gymnasium for staff, a kitchen, and miscellaneous indoor and outdoor functional areas.

Fleet Vehicle Maintenance Facility
Vehicle Maintenance Building for servicing of Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services
operations vehicles as well as Waste Services collection vehicles.

Vehicle charging stations and infrastructure
Electric charging stations for light to medium duty vehicles.

Electric backbone infrastructure for charging of heavy-duty vehicles in the future.

Parking Areas and Access Roadways
Sufficient parking for operational vehicles (heavy and light duty), staff, and members of the public.

Access roadways on the site between functional areas.

Utilities

Installing and connecting municipal storm drain, potable water or sewer services to Project site. Upgrading electric power at the site.

Additional Site Improvements
Demolition and removal of existing buildings or infrastructure on the property.

Security systems including gates, controlled access, cameras, emergency access by fire and police.

Water efficient landscaping throughout the facility. All facilities are required to follow the City of Roseville Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO).

HDR's scope of work includes preliminary design and the preparation of environmental studies, reports, and documents sufficient to prepare California Environmental Quality Act documentation required for all the facilities and improvements listed in items A. through G.

This project is proposed to progress in several Phases. The City published a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Professional Design Services for Phase 1 on September 30, 2022.

On November 16, 2022, one (1) consultant submitted a proposal for Professional Design Services for the Project. The proposal, from HDR Engineering, Inc., was evaluated by Environmental Utilities staff and an interview with the HDR team was held on December 15, 2022, to discuss assumptions, scope, fee, and sequence of work. Through these discussions, it was realized that until the initial investigations, analysis, and preliminary tasks were complete, scoping of subsequent tasks described in the RFP could not be accurately defined. It was agreed that tasks for Phase 1 should be divided into two groups; Phase 1A and Phase 1B as the tasks in group 1B could be more accurately defined and refined costs could be prepared after the findings of group 1A tasks were completed. Staff intends to award the contract for Phase 1B at a later date under the original RFP as all tasks in Phase 1 were included in the RFP.

HDR’s Professional Design Services Agreement is attached. The scope and fee schedule are included in the agreement as Exhibit A (scope) and Exhibit B (fee schedule).

FISCAL IMPACT
The total project budget needed for Phase 1A is $2,930,300 and is available from resources in the Waste Services Operations and the Water Operations funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Services to prepare an environmental analysis of the proposed future site development pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are part of HDR’s scope of work for Phase 1A. It is anticipated that CEQA compliance will require a stand-alone EIR that includes both Project-level and programmatic analysis, making maximum use of other analyses in the area, including the recent Sunset Area Plan EIR and the Roseville Industrial Park project.

The approval of a contract for design and environmental documentation does not commit the City to approval of the proposed project, and provides the necessary authorization to prepare documentation pursuant to CEQA. The project is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Gainey, Principal Engineer
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-150
HDR Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 23-150

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND HDR ENGINEERING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a professional design services agreement for the Environmental Utilities Operations Center Project, Phase 1A, by and between the City of Roseville and HDR Engineering, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk
1 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023]

PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT
Environmental Utilities Operations Center Project – Phase 1

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and HDR Engineering, Inc., a Nebraska corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY desires professional design services consisting of engineering analysis, strategic planning, field investigation, environmental services, and engineering design; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a proposal dated November 16, 2022, which describes the scope of work to be performed by CONSULTANT, the budget for the work, and the schedule for performance of the work; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide such professional design services related to the Environmental Utilities Operations Center Project – Phase 1.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. CONSULTANT shall perform all services with the care and skill ordinarily used by 2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] members of CONSULTANT’s profession practicing under the same or similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality.

2. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the budget estimate as described in EXHIBIT “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Total compensation shall not exceed two million, nine hundred thirty thousand, three hundred dollars ($2,930,300).

CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices for its services. Such invoices shall be delineated by task, the person performing the services, and the hourly rate, which shall be stated in time increments of not greater than one-tenth (1/10) hours. CITY shall pay invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

3. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, including the cost to defend CITY, and its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, costs or liability that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT and its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by CITY or the agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to CITY, or arising from the active negligence of CITY. Notwithstanding any terms of this section, indemnification and defense obligations shall conform to California Civil Code Section 2782.8.

CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that 3 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

4. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY

Workers’ Compensation Statutory

Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence $4,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$2,000,000 each occurrence
$4,000,000 aggregate

Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit

Professional Liability (errors and $2,000,000 per claim omissions) $4,000,000 aggregate

a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation 4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is 5 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

5. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a 6 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder, and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provisions in its contracts with all subcontractors.

6. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

7. Prevailing Wages. When applicable, for purposes of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall comply with all applicable prevailing wage laws, e.g., but not limited to, California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. In accordance with said Section 1775, CONSULTANT shall forfeit as a penalty to the City two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any work done on-site under the Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subcontractor in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Labor Code Sections 1770 to 1780, inclusive. In addition to said penalty and pursuant to said Section 1775, the difference between such stipulated prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage shall be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or the applicable subcontractor.
7 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] Pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1773, the contracting department has identified the source, stated below, of the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the site to be done, for straight time, overtime, and holiday work. The holiday wage rate listed shall be applicable to all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining agreement of the particular craft, classification or type of worker concerned. These wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal, and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

8. Contractor Registration. No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. CONSULTANT is hereby notified that this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

9. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.
8 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023]

10. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

11. Governing Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and its EXHIBITS, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. In the event of any conflict between any of the EXHIBITS, the provisions of the first in order of attachment shall govern.

12. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

13. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; 9 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

14. Representation and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

15. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible materials (“Material”) created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings, papers, 10 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY. Any modification or reuse of such Materials for purposes other than those intended by this Agreement shall be at CITY’s sole risk and without liability to CONSULTANT.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

In the event that CONSULTANT uses, employs, designates, or retains any person or entity who is not an employee of CONSULTANT, to perform any work required of it pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall require said person or entity to execute an agreement containing the preceding paragraph.

17. Termination of Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

The City may also terminate this Agreement for cause but only after providing CONSULTANT written notice of the breach and a period of ten (10) days to cure. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice.

In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any Material, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

18. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, 11 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys’ fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

19. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

20. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement is for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

21. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT

Richard D. Plecker Tim Raibley
Environmental Utilities Director HDR Engineering, Inc. 2005 Hilltop Circle 2365 Iron Point Road, Ste. 300
Roseville, CA 95747 Folsom, CA 95630

Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

22. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

23. Subsurface Conditions. In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations, the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points and sample intervals and at locations other than where observations, exploration, and investigations have been made. Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect total cost and/or execution. These conditions and cost/delays associated with such variances are not the 12 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] responsibility of CONSULTANT and, if such conditions impact CONSULTANT’s services, the parties will negotiate an equitable adjustment to CONSULTANT’s fee and/or schedule for performance.

24. Cost Estimates. Any opinions of probable project cost or probable construction cost provided by CONSULTANT are made on the basis of information available to CONSULTANT and on the basis of CONSULTANT’s experience and qualifications, and represents its judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. However, since CONSULTANT has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the contractor(s’) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, CONSULTANT does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual project or construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost CONSULTANT prepares.

25. Construction Procedures. CONSULTANT’s observation or monitoring portions of the work performed under construction contracts shall not relieve the contractor from its responsibility for performing work in accordance with applicable contract documents.

CONSULTANT shall not control or have charge of, and shall not be responsible for, construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures of construction, health or safety programs or precautions connected with the work and shall not manage, supervise, control or have charge of construction. CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of the contractor or other parties on the project.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk 13 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023] under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a HDR ENGINEERING, INC., a
municipal corporation Nebraska corporation
BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________
RICHARD D. PLECKER
Environmental Utilities Director
Holly Kennedy, Senior Vice President

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023]

EXHIBIT “A”

hdrinc.com
2365 Iron Point Road, Suite 300, Folsom, CA 95630-8709 (916) 817-4700

March 10, 2023
City of Roseville
Attn: Janice R. Gainey, P.E.Senior Engineer
Environmental Utilities – Engineering
2005 Hilltop Circle | Roseville, CA | 95747

RE: Exhibit A: Scope of Services to Provide Professional Design Services for the City of Roseville’ Utility Operations Center Phase 1 RFP # 08-104 Dear Janice,
HDR is pleased to offer the attached Scope of Work for the City’s Environmental Utility Operations Center Project Phase 1. We have rearranged the tasks in the RFP slightly to fit our approach to the Project by adding several tasks that we believe are instrumental in the success of the Project and rearranging the tasks to fit the anticipated project phasing. We offer the following table as a guide to correlate the RFP tasks to HDR’s proposed task list.

RFP Task and Name Proposed Task and Name Description/Rationale Phase 1A

1. Project Management
and Meetings

1. Project Management and
Meetings

2. Strategic Planning The new task is needed to
focus the planning and
design efforts to meet the
2025 RRTO construction
schedule.

2. Field Investigations
and Data Collection

3. Field Investigations and Data
Collection

3. Environmental
Services
The task has moved down to
Proposed Task 5.

4. Conceptual Design 4. Conceptual Design

5. Environmental Services The task was moved to occur
after the Conceptual Design
that will be used in the
Project description.
*Scope and Budget to be negotiated at a later date.

HDR understands and the City has agreed that after the Tasks included in Phase 1A are complete, the tasks in Phase 1B will be refined to reflect the project that has evolved at that point and that HDR will develop a scope and fee for the Phase 1B tasks at that time.

Sincerely,
HDR Engineering, Inc.

Tim Raibley, PE Holly Kennedy,
Project Manager Senior Vice President
Email: [email protected] [email protected]
Phone 916 817 4914 Phone: 925 465 2717
Phase 1B

5. Preliminary Design
and BODR

6. Preliminary Design and BODR

7. Permitting The new task is needed to
secure state and local
permits for the RRTO. This
will occur concurrently with
CEQA. The scope and budget
for this task is not included at
this time

6. Final Design of RRTO 8. Final Design of RRTO The scope and budget for this task is not included at this
time

7. CD and Contracting
Support

9. CD and Contracting Support* The scope and budget for this task is not included at this
time.

8. ESDC and CM 10. ESCD and CM* The scope and budget for this task is not included at this
time.

1 Exhibit A - Scope of Work
For the City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Operations Facility Design Services - Phase 1A
TASK 1. Project Management and Meetings
The purpose of Task 1 is to support project management services and keep the City informed of the progress of the Project. This task will address the following key aspects:
a. Overall project, cost, and schedule management.
b. Specific routine and deliverable meetings with the City. c. Critical path scheduling.
d. Web based project file management and tracking system. e. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) for overall project deliverables (specific design submittal QA/QC included in relevant tasks).

Project Management and Meetings
Task 1.1 Project Management
The HDR Team will monitor the phases of work. Project Management will be managed under a single project management task for project execution, office administration, invoicing, coordinating work of the design team, and coordinating and reporting on the progress of the Project to the City. We will monitor project progress, assign labor resources, review work products, respond to City requests and concerns, and maintain communications with City staff regarding the work schedule and budget.

Monthly invoices will include progress reports and each report will summarize the work accomplished during the billing period, the work forecast anticipated for the following month, and a summary of the spent and remaining amounts.

Preparation of Critical Path Scheduling for the duration of the Project prior to construction will be performed under this task. Scheduling will be performed using Microsoft Project.

Task 1.2 Meetings
The HDR Team will schedule a Project kick-off meeting and technical review meetings to facilitate dialogue between project team members and to review submittals at subsequent phases of the work.
• Facilitate a bi-weekly virtual meeting during the first six months of the Project to keep the City staff appraised of the Project’s progress.
• Schedule a pre-design meeting with City staff to discuss and investigate options and available alternatives for facility settings, equipment, and construction logistics. 2 • Schedule coordination meetings, workshops, and technical review meetings with key City staff and appropriate technical specialists. This will include agendas for upcoming meetings, Project meeting minutes, and a master log for tracking action items.

Task 1.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Provide and perform QA/QC. Establish a web-based document and tracking system for work progress submittals, exchange of information, and project cost tracking. • Conduct formal internal review procedures prior to submittal of the Project deliverables to provide an objective check on the adequacy of the related work products.

Assumptions for Task 1:
• For the first six months of the Project, the HDR Project Manager (PM) will facilitate a virtual bi-weekly status meeting to report on the progress of the Project. For the remainder of the Project, the meeting frequency will be reduced to a monthly status meeting.
• PM tasks are based on activities through Task 5 for the design of the Resource Recovery and Transfer Operation (RRTO). For budgeting purposes, it is assumed 18 months duration from commencement of the Project to the completion of Task 5, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) effort.
• For scheduling, it is anticipated startup and significant activity within the first three months for a total of 50 hours. For the remainder of the duration, it is assumed five hours per month that includes schedule maintenance.
• It is assumed that the City will identify and provide its core team members to the Project Management team for attendance at regular Project update meetings.

At the end of the Project, HDR assumes the City will move data from the web-based document and tracking system to their server, unless otherwise requested.

Deliverables for Task 1:
• Monthly Progress Reports.
• Meeting Agendas and Meetings Minutes.
• Web-based Project tracking system.
• Microsoft Project-based Critical Path Schedule will be transmitted electronically to a PDF format monthly for two years.

TASK 2. Strategic Planning (HDR proposed task)
The purpose of this task is to define the functional requirements and timing of the facilities, to simplify the subsequent CEQA, Permitting, and Design efforts to produce a project implementation process that meets the Project delivery sequencing. This will be accomplished by performing the following steps:
a. Create a Facilities Functional Strategic Team (Facility Team) and determine key functional requirements of the project and associated schedule for implementation. 3 b. Create a Utilities Strategic Team (Utilities Team) and determine the direction and schedule of delivery of the required water, sewer, power, and stormwater utility services. c. Create an Environmental and Permitting Strategic Team (Environmental and Permitting Team) to determine the strategy for both CEQA and environmental permitting efforts to streamline the processes for efficiency, long term flexibility, and functional expansion of future phased development.
d. Document a summary of the insights and recommendations of the individual Strategic Team efforts into a consolidated guidance document for the Conceptual Design, CEQA, and Permitting tasks.

Sequencing of the meetings and deliverables for this strategy phase will be conducted to avoid overlap and undue requirements of the City staff. The following subtasks describe each of these key aspects.

Task 2.1 Facility Team
It is anticipated the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)’s review of a new compost facility could result in heightened analysis that would extend the CEQA review process and prevent the RRTO from being constructed within the City’s timeframe. While we understand this function is desirable, it may be preferable to include this function at a programmatic level rather than a Project level in the CEQA process. The nuance of how these topics are resolved through the CEQA/permitting process is described in the forthcoming Environmental Strategy task. We point this example out as an illustration of the types of concerns we believe need to be vetted regarding the future waste facility functions and the overall permitting process. Additional facility functions that may impact the process include anaerobic digestion, gasification, and related conversion technologies.

The Facility Team will be performed by two separate groups, namely a group focused on the Corporation Yard and a separate group focused on the Solid Waste/Recycling functions of the facility. Each group will focus on their respective portion of the future facility but will confer and work together to resolve how the site should be arranged to accommodate both functions.

The Facility Team will begin by reviewing the Corporation Yard Assessment Study, previously prepared by HDR, and the Western Placer Waste Management Authority (WPWMA) facility forecast studies, previously conducted by Jacobs. In addition to review of these two prior studies, the Corporation Yard team will engage Environmental Utility staff using a virtual meeting format to discuss their perspective of the future needs of the Corporation Yard, its area, staffing, and functionality. The Corp Yard team will be led by senior corporation yard staff who will facilitate a series of interactive meetings with the Environmental Utility staff, engaging them on sizing, site massing, infrastructure needs, etc. Some of the key aspects this Corp Yard will need to address is the likelihood of shifting the fleet fueling/charging from CNG to electricity over the near term of the facility use. We will assess these and related topics, bringing our initial insights and concepts into a series of virtual working sessions or meetings. We anticipate the use of virtual meetings initially, which will serve to minimize travel-related costs and focus on the data, analysis, and developing of conceptual site layouts as discussed in Task 4 below. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed up to three virtual meetings for the Corporation Yard team will occur before the final in-person workshop discussed below. 4 Similar to the Corp Yard functionality, the Solid Waste/Recycling group will confirm project assumptions, throughput ranges and overall sizing-related assumptions for the solid waste aspects of the facility. The Solid Waste/Recycling group will be led by Tim Raibley and supported by our national waste facilities lead Bob Rella. Similar to the Corporation yard team above, the solid waste/recycling team will engage the city staff in a series of virtual meetings.

The solid waste/recycling group will discuss changes to the assumptions of future solid waste and recycling options the city may prefer. These include recycling throughput ranges based on recyclables generated within the city but also interest expressed by regional jurisdictions or private sector providers in the region. Other variables include options for transfer and disposal of residuals, transfer and processing of organics elsewhere and/or processing at the new site.

Our solid waste/recycling team will offer suggestions for scale house queuing, buy-back and household hazardous waste management functions. Although this task is before the conceptual design effort, these insights will inform our team on the sizing and functionality of the facility which will ultimately be used when developing the conceptual design phase of the project. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed up to three virtual meetings for the Solid Waste/Recycling team will occur before the final in-person workshop discussed below.

As part of the planning efforts, we will address key features of the facility, required timing, influence on the CEQA process, and the likely requirements expected to be imposed on the project by the local/state regulatory agencies. As the planning effort concludes, we anticipate meeting in person to confirm our work using a workshop or charrette format. The intent of the final in-person workshop is to finalize the analysis and conclude the future functional needs of the facility, focusing on those features which are urgent or near term, and those which could be considered optional or postponed to a future time. This approach is also presented in Task 2.3 below; however, it is described here due to the importance of defining the facility function as the primary concern for this team. Following the concluding workshop, key discussions, needs, preferences, and related insights of the meeting will be summarized. Key decisions and programmatic summaries will be documented in a formal Key Decision Document and coordinated with the other strategy teams.

Task 2.2 Utilities Team
The function of the Utilities Team is to analyze and select the appropriate remedy to the lack of utilities at the site. The Utilities Team will be led by senior utility staff who will coordinate the outcomes of each of the specialized topics below.
• Power Supply: This team will evaluate the necessity and benefits of either utilizing a temporary utility infrastructure installation, or permanent on-site utilities that could be incorporated into the City systems in the future, or extension and interconnection with the public utility system. We will also explore timing of securing a new service sized to supply the needs of the RRTO (Phase 1) project versus later to support the larger power demand needs.
• Sanitary Sewer: The Sanitary Sewer aspects of the overall site will be explored in conjunction with the Utility Operations Center site and the overall facility plan. Use of a temporary or initial phase sanitary service versus the traditional extension of utilities to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) will be assessed. Potential sanitary sewer options may include pressure/mound system, temporary collection, traditional sewer/extension, septic, or a storage system for off-site trucking to the WWTP. 5 • Water Supply: This team will evaluate new RRTO potable and non-potable (fire suppression and wash down) water source including a new groundwater well or extending existing City potable water utility service to the site. Assessment considerations for a new well or use of existing well(s) will be based on available existing well historical performance and flow data.

The Utilities Team will incorporate insights and decisions from the Facility Team efforts to understand the range of demands for each utility category. The Facility Team, in coordination with the City’s input, will develop assumptions to support potable and non-potable water demand estimates, such as timing of staff and facility use and occupancy levels, irrigation needs, fire suppression requirements, washdown requirements, etc. The team will develop conceptual alternatives for each option being considered. In lieu of an initial workshop session, a high-level pro/con assessment of the development options will be prepared for each utility.

The pro/con assessment will include consideration of cost, time, environmental/permitting process, and other key related metrics. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed up to three virtual meetings for the Utilities team (one for each of the key topics discussed above) will occur.

This information will be provided to the Environmental and Permitting Team for consideration.

Task 2.3 Environmental and Permitting Strategic
Team
The Project involves an ambitious effort by the City to provide needed facilities for SB 1383 compliance and achieve the City’s sustainability goals over the long term. The environmental and permitting strategy needs to be balanced with environmental review document and permitting requirements for the process to be as seamless as possible to avoid unnecessary time delays in either the environmental review or securing permits.

The compost example referenced above in Task 2.1 depicts the potential influence of a reviewing agency on the CEQA timing. As a first step in the environmental review and permitting processes, our team will assist the City in selecting appropriate boundaries of the environmental study and further determine what aspects would be appropriately addressed from a project- specific level (as part of Phase 1) and other aspects to be addressed programmatically, while allowing for future streamlining and tiering under CEQA. This approach is intended to realize permitting efficiency and flexibility, in addition to articulating the nexus between the state and local permits and the environmental study. Both the environmental study and the state/local permits need to be prepared in such a way that when approved, they provide the city with flexibility in terms of operations and implementing changes to the facility in the future.

The team will focus the results on selecting Project level components confined to those aspects of the facility that are absolutely going to be constructed in the near future and are also relatively straightforward with respect to their permitting pathway. Programmatic level components should be used for aspects of the facility that are more subjective and may or may not eventually be constructed. Also, programmatic components may be features that are currently considered optional and may require prolongated permitting review processes by other agencies. These types of components could slow down the environmental process if these components were included as a Project level. It is anticipated the review process by APCD to be prolonged and may delay APCD from supporting the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR). If the City anticipates the necessity of this component is less than the known features (e.g., the RRTO), it 6 may be recommended the compost facility be addressed at a programmatic level in the environmental study.

The decisions that define the environmental study will inform the Environmental and Permitting Strategy Team of the structure of the Project Description that will be developed later in the CEQA process, but also the features that are incorporated into the preparation of the Solid Waste Facility Permit and the APCD to construct permit and Countywide Non-Disposal Element permit applications.

Task 2.4 Conclusion of Strategic Planning Teams
It is intended to summarize the outcomes of the three strategic teams into a single Strategy Planning Technical Memorandum (TM). The Strategy Planning TM will summarize the conclusions of each of the strategic teams to inform and guide the subsequent site master planning, CEQA, permitting, and utility/infrastructure tasks.

Assumptions for Task 2:
• Key HDR, Jacobs, Ascent, Douglas Environmental, and Edgar & Associates staff will participate in each of the of the Strategy Planning sessions. Approximately eleven (11) virtual meetings will be conducted with two (2) to four (4) technical professionals in each of the virtual meetings. These include three virtual meetings for the Corporation Yard team, three virtual meetings for the Waste/Recycling team, three (3) virtual meetings for the Utilities Team and two (2) virtual meetings for the Environmental Team have been budgeted. Also, we have assumed up to six (6) technical professionals will attend the one day in-person workshop at the conclusion of the planning process. • Strategy Planning sessions are assumed to be focused efforts to identify key, high-level decisions to guide the subsequent planning, permitting, and design efforts to be as successful and efficient as possible. The Strategic Planning sessions are envisioned to be completed within a concentrated ten to twelve-week timeframe. • Key decision makers representing the City’s technical, planning, financial, and management are assumed to be available to participate in these strategic planning efforts.
• Scope of work and fee is based on two rounds of review for each submittal and assumes (except for the Final submittal) reviewers will backcheck comment responses against the updates included in the subsequence submittal.
• Available data on existing groundwater wells (such as geotechnical, well logs, historical performance and groundwater levels, water quality, and maintenance records) will be provided by the City and will be used for desktop comparison of 1) existing groundwater wells, 2) new groundwater wells, and 3) potable water pipeline extension. Data gaps will be addressed through use of assumptions for the purpose of the strategic evaluation.

Field investigation of existing wells is not included in this scope.

Deliverables for Task 2:
• Meeting Agendas and Minutes, including Key Decisions. • Key results of each of the Strategy Team conclusions including:
7 a. A Master Facility Function Concept Plan addressing the key aspects of the Project and their respective timing.
b. A Master Utility Concept Plan defining the anticipated demands for power, sewer, and water services required by the facility components. c. A Master CEQA/Permitting Concept Plan addressing which components of the Project must be included at a Project level, which can be addressed at a programmatic level, and the rationale for both.
d. Develop selection metrics for evaluating a water supply system, e.g., capital and O&M costs, schedule, and risks.
e. Develop selection method for evaluating a water supply system, e.g., advantages and disadvantages.
• Draft and Final Technical Memorandum summarizing the results of the combined Strategic Planning phase.

TASK 3. Field Investigations and Data Collection
The purpose of Task 3 is to capture information necessary for later planning and design efforts.

This will be accomplished by the following steps:
a. Develop data request document and submit to the City for response. Should the information be unavailable, site reconnaissance may be required. b. Develop survey controls and mapping needs and secure topographic and boundary information required for design.
c. Develop geotechnical investigation and analysis program requirements at Project planning phase and initiate field and laboratory effort. d. Hydrogeologic investigation is an optional task.
e. CEQA field studies and investigations are included in Task 5.

Task 3.1 Data Collection.

Collect data required to facilitate the work from the City. Perform site reconnaissance as described below.

Task 3.2 Survey and Mapping
Prepare a topographic survey for engineering and design purposes. The Project covers a 243- acre site. Deliverables will include survey in an AutoCAD, 2018 or newer, compatible format.

Project files, including survey and mapping information, will be tied to the City’s GPS monument network.

Records research will be performed to obtain the record deed for the current ownership and available survey maps for the site. A field search will be performed to locate property corner monuments or other boundary evidence. A title report will be purchased and existing easements from that report will be shown. New property monuments will not be set, and no Record of Survey will be filed with the County.
8 Baseline data used for horizontal control will be coordinated with past surveys at the site, as available and provided by the City, such that a baseline established for this project is the same as a baseline used in a past survey, or it can be converted back to the previous baseline, if necessary. The coordinates and elevations shall be shown in Imperial units. Survey control traverses shall be diagrammed (in the field book) in Imperial units.

Topographic and Boundary Task/Activities:
• Use provided survey control from client; otherwise utilize state plane coordinates. • Set new survey monuments, as needed.
• Set targets for aerial surveying.
• Perform aerial topographic survey for the site.
• Perform land survey to pick up surface features identified as relevant by the City. • Perform QC survey to check the topographic survey and other survey documents provided by others.
• Process and draft topographic survey.
• Perform final QC for topographic survey.
• Perform subsurface utility assessment within the allowance included in this estimate, as listed below.

Assumptions and Exclusions for Task 3.2:
• The City will provide a list of surface features/items to be picked up with the land survey as surface visible and which can be completed in one mobilization. • Having recently purchased the site, we understand a boundary survey already exists. • New property monuments will not be set.
• No Record of Survey will be filed.
• No engineered traffic control will be provided.
• No legal descriptions, easements, parcel numbers or ALTA survey included. • No potholing allowances.
• For budgeting purposes, $25,000 has been allotted for subsurface utility investigations and mapping. If desired by the City, this allowance could be used by for the survey and civil team to obtain County, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and other available utility maps to compile for approximate utility locations. This would not include septic tanks, wastewater, water, and gas lines to the structures that are not part of these maps. No subsurface features will be “positivity identified,” but assumed to be approximately located based on this work. This information could then be added to the site maps. The contractor could then confirm these locations for construction. 9 • Work will be completed in one mobilization.

Deliverables for Task 3.2:
• Topography and digital terrain model (DTM) for the site, including utility mapping. • A drawing file incompatible with AutoCAD 2018 or newer format, at one-foot contour intervals.
• Aerial photogrammetric photo of the area.

Task 3.3 Geotechnical
Conduct a geotechnical investigation to inform the Conceptual Planning and CEQA tasks of potential geotechnical constraints that may exist at the site, such as the presence of unsuitable soils. This geotechnical investigation program will be conducted in the planning phase to get a general understanding of the site for planning level decisions about site configuration, presence of unsuitable subsurface conditions, etc. This study will not be appropriate for design level guidance however to constrain the costs of the investigation until the planning level decisions are resolved. The work to be performed for the planning phase is described below.

Planning Phase Geotechnical Study
As described in Task 2, the HDR Team will undertake a planning effort that will, among other things, help determine the types of facilities that will be needed and their locations. In support of this effort, conduct a planning phase subsurface exploration program and prepare a preliminary geotechnical report for general site information. The preliminary geotechnical report can also be used to support the work effort that will be required under CEQA, including preparation of the EIR.

Review of Information
Review available geotechnical and geologic information regarding the Project area, including published geologic information pertaining to the site vicinity. Additionally, review the logs of previous geotechnical explorations provided.

Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing
The field investigation program will consist of four to eight borings drilled across the site area to characterize general subsurface conditions. An effort will be made to perform the borings in areas where facilities structures are anticipated to be located. A drilling subcontractor will perform the borings using hollow stem auger drilling equipment. Prior to performing the field exploration, the drilling sub will obtain the required City soil boring permits. A site reconnaissance to locate the exploration point and mark the proposed test borings will be conducted and Underground Service Alert (USA) will be notified prior to undertaking test borings.

An HDR field representative will observe drilling of the borings, log the soil encountered, and obtain soil samples for further visual classification and laboratory testing. The borings will be backfilled upon completion per City boring permit requirements.

Laboratory testing will be conducted on selected samples recovered from the test borings.

These tests could include, as appropriate:
10 • Classification and Index Tests such as fines content, gradation, and Atterberg limits. • Moisture Content and Density Tests.
• Strength tests.

Preliminary Engineering Evaluation and Preliminary Report Preparation Based on the conditions encountered in the field exploration and laboratory test results, an engineering evaluation will be prepared to develop preliminary geotechnical conclusions and recommendations. A summary planning level geotechnical report describing the subsurface conditions encountered will be prepared and include, as appropriate, field and laboratory test data, logs of the test borings, and a site plan showing the locations of the explorations. The report will present preliminary discussions, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the following, as appropriate:
• Vicinity map and exploration location plan.
• Logs of test borings.
• Site geology and seismicity.
• Soil conditions.
• Groundwater levels.
• Discussion of the potential for seismic hazards, including liquefaction potential. • Discussion of other geologic and geotechnical considerations for the proposed development.
• Preliminary conclusions and recommendations for anticipated building foundation types and earthwork considerations, including suitability of on-site soil for reuse as fill.

The draft preliminary geotechnical report will be issued in PDF format only, for review and comment by the Project team. Following receipt of review comments, a final preliminary geotechnical report will be prepared in PDF format only.

Assumptions for Geotechnical Task 3.3:
• Field work will occur during normal weekday work hours. • Driller will be provided ready access to the site.
• Soil cuttings can be left on site at boring locations. • The soil cuttings will be relatively free of contaminants. If that is not the case, additional fee would be required for special handling and disposal. • Potentially liquefiable soil would not be encountered to an extent that would lead to the site being categorized as Site Class F. The California Building Code (CBC) 2019 and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7-16 criteria require that site-specific seismic response analysis be performed for Site Class F sites. Additionally, the 2019 CBC extends the requirement for site-specific site response analysis to Site Classes D 11 and E (in high seismic areas) with three exceptions allowing the use of code-based (i.e., non-site-specific) procedures. It is assumed the Project will meet the appropriate exception(s) and that code-based procedures will be followed to develop project design response spectra. The scope and fee required for site-specific seismic hazard analysis would be additional to what is presented herein and can be determined at a later time, should it be needed. Additional time in the Project schedule would also be required to perform such an analysis.

Deliverables for Task 3.3:
• Draft and final planning level geotechnical report in PDF format.

Task 3.4 Potable Water System – New Well and Potable Pipeline Extension Evaluation We will assess the condition, capacity, and water quality of the existing site wells to determine potential viability for use as water supply. Scope activities include:
• Request and review available well data from the City, County, West Placer Ground Sustainability Agency (GSA), California Department of Water Resources (DWR), and GEI files from previous work for the City including well logs, groundwater levels, and water quality.
• Request and review available portable water data from the City and County including utility maps, hydraulic reports, and assessor maps.
• One site visit.

Deliverables for Task 3.4:
• Summary TM to summarize options, describe selection metrics and methodology, and preferred option.

Assumptions for Task 3.4:
• Existing groundwater wells have geotechnical, installation, historical performance, and maintenance records sufficient for desktop evaluation. Well evaluation and performance pump tests may be required in the future (scoped as Optional Task 3.5). • Extending the existing potable water utility to the site will be contingent upon available hydraulic flow capacities and right-of-way procurements. • There are sufficient existing potable water system capacities to meet new RRTO water needs.
• Right-of-way easement for potable water pipeline extension to the site will neither be cost prohibitive or obstructive.
• Scope excludes hydraulic analysis, property title searches, and right-of-way easement procurement.
12 Task 3.5 Existing Well Evaluation (OPTIONAL)
The HDR Team will assess the condition, capacity, and water quality of the existing site wells to determine potential viability for use as water supply. Scope activities include:
• Examine each well and document the surface conditions with photographs and document physical conditions (e.g., well diameter, casing height above grade, pump information from branding plate, flow control and conveyance equipment). • Measure the static depth to water if an access port is available. • In coordination with the farmer and the City, operate each well for a short period (up to 2 hours). Measure the flow of the well (via a temporary flow meter, orifice plate, weir, or other device), wellhead pressure, and pumping level to determine the current well specific capacity. Also monitor temperature, pH, ORP, and conductivity of the groundwater discharge.
• During pump operation, measure pump vibration and, if an electric motor is used, current and voltage of each power lead.
• Work with a pump subcontractor to perform a downhole evaluation of each well.

1. Remove the pump from each well.

2. Complete video surveys to evaluate the condition of each well (e.g., depth to groundwater, perforated interval, total depth, condition of blank and perforated casing, presence of scale and/or biomass).

3. Brush the interior of the well to remove scale and biomass that may have accumulated with age.

4. Complete a second video survey if scale or biomatter obscured the view of the first survey.

5. Complete a cement bond log to identify the depth of the annular cement seal below grade.

6. Complete a 4-arm caliper log of the entire well to evaluate the roundness of the well screens and casing as an indication of unbalance stresses.

7. Install a test pump and conduct pumping tests to evaluate the capacity of each well, including the following:
o Step-drawdown pumping test: up to four (4) hours per well to evaluate pumping efficiency (four 1-hour steps) and identify an optimal rate of operation. o Constant-rate pumping test: up to eight (8) hours per well to further define flow capacity of each well and the hydraulic characteristics of the aquifer. o Measure water levels in the other three wells during each constant-rate test to identify the drawdown caused by each pumping well on the other non-pumping wells.
13 o Collect a sample of groundwater at the end of each constant-rate test for laboratory analysis of general mineral constituents and Title 22 constituents for drinking water.

8. Complete a location survey of each well, including the coordinates of the well center and the elevations of grade and top of casing reference, to support the accurate determination of groundwater direction and gradient of flow.

9. Reinstall the existing pump and motor and replace components that were destroyed or damaged during the well assessment if operation of the well is likely to occur in the future.

10. If pump/motor appear to have performance characteristics appropriate for production, have the pump and several sections of the line-shaft column disassembled and evaluated by Eaton Pumps to determine remaining service life before reinstalling in the well. (Note: cost for pump contractor evaluation is additional and is not included in the fee.)
Deliverables for Task 3.5 (OPTIONAL):
• Technical write up to describe the fieldwork and present an interpretation of the findings, including pump and motor condition, for the potential use of these wells for water supply.

Assumptions for Task 3.5 (OPTIONAL):
• Rehabilitation, such as mechanical swabbing, pumping, and /or chemical treatment to improve flow into the well and remove residual screen deposits, may be recommended based on the second well video.

Task 3.6 Hydrogeologic Investigation (OPTIONAL)
GEI will conduct hydrogeologic investigations to determine subsurface conditions for suitability for an Aquifer Storage and Recovery well on the project site. We will prepare a technical report to present an interpretation of the findings for the suitability of the subsurface for ASR operations, based on the data review and fieldwork completed in Task 3.4. The report will include a tabulation of the various types of information (e.g., groundwater levels, water quality constituents, flow). Specific activities include:
•
Review proposed ASR source water quality information compiled by the City. A recommendation for additional water quality analyses will be provided to the City to reduce uncertainty in the results of the geochemical compatibility assessment. • Hydrogeologic information compiled in Task 3.4 will be supplemented with data related to aquifer minerology, location of existing and planned high-capacity wells, and potentiometric surface information to estimate regional groundwater flow direction and velocity, as well as associated impacts on stored water loss. A spreadsheet model will be used to estimate annual losses for seasonal and drought storage options, based on flow gradient.
• ASR Zone Characterization:
o Estimate the sustainable injection and recovery rates and potential storage volumes. 14 o Conduct a preliminary geochemical evaluation to investigate the potential adverse chemical reactions between the source water and groundwater. Potential chemical reactions between the storage zone native water and aquifer matrix, and the recharge water will be identified to assess potential impacts on ASR operations. The U.S.

Geological Survey modeling program PHREEQC v.3 (Parkhurst and Appelo, 2013) will be used to simulate potential chemical reactions.
• Estimate cost of a typical ASR well and site improvements, include both capital and operational costs.
• Summarize regulatory requirements for implementing an ASR system.

Deliverables for Task 3.6 (OPTIONAL):
• Summary Technical Memorandum – A draft technical memorandum will be prepared to summarize the results of the assessment. A final TM will be prepared to incorporate City review comments.

Assumptions for Task 3.6 (OPTIONAL):
• Current/future supply and demand budgets will not be developed or considered. • City to provide water quality data for the water proposed for ASR management. • Participate in one project meeting to discuss the results of the investigation.

TASK 4. Conceptual Design
The purpose of this task is to develop preliminary designs of the overall facility Project, inclusive of possible functional uses of the site.

Building on the strategic planning task, we will use the information gained in Task 2 above as input in developing the conceptual design. For this task, we will create a conceptual design for site features (schematic design), including building locations, other structures, demolition requirements, parking and staging areas, traffic circulation, landscape features, and temporary and permanent utilities. The sizing for each of these features will be based on the insights gained in Task 2 but refreshed by city staff if new insights are gained in interim. Additionally, we will develop planning level opinions of probable cost for construction and finalize project level descriptions for incorporation into CEQA process.

We will develop initial design concepts and options to meet the identified Project objectives. As noted above, we will prepare schematic design exhibits indicative of alternative approaches of the facility layout.

We will continue the use of the Facility Team as above, using two separate groups, namely group focused on the Corporation Yard and a separate group focused on the Solid Waste/Recycling functions of the facility. Each group will continue their focus on their respective portion of the future facility but will confer and work together to prepare the conceptual design, resolve the use of shared access, infrastructure, staffing, etc. 15 The Corporation Yard team will reengage Environmental Utility staff to discuss facility sizing related aspects of the Corporation Yard. The Corp Yard team will continue to be led by Darren Penn, who will prepare the Corporation Yard sizing and conceptual site arrangement efforts. We will continue the use of virtual meetings to conserve budget. We will prepare up to three schematic site arrangements of the Corporation Yard that will be transmitted to the city for review and consideration.

Similar to the Corp Yard functionality, the Solid Waste/Recycling group will reengage to prepare the site sizing and related site configuration plans for the conceptual design. The Solid Waste/Recycling group will continue to be led by Tim Raibley and supported by our national waste facilities lead Bob Rella. The solid waste/recycling group will prepare site sizing analysis and coordinate with the Corporation Yard group to discuss site ingress, utilities and share infrastructure. As mentioned briefly in Task 2 above, the solid waste and recycling group will revisit and refine/reduce the assumptions of future solid waste and recycling options the site will serve. By this time of the project, we will need to focus the conceptual design to address a single, preferred remedy that addresses a defined throughput quantity of recyclables, a preferred remedy for transfer/disposal of MSW and the preferred organics transfer or on-site technology for processing. The Solid Waste/Recycling group will also reengage the city staff to discuss facility sizing related aspects of the solid waste, recycling and organics aspects of the facility. We will also continue the use of virtual meetings to conserve budget. We will prepare up to three schematic site arrangements of the RRTO that will be transmitted to the city for review and consideration.

These efforts will focus on analyzing growth projections and changes in regulations for the administration building, parking, vehicle maintenance facility, vehicle charging facilities, and solid waste handling and processing facilities to refine objectives for the layout and sizing of each functional facility.

To incorporate the preferred site arrangements of both the Corporation Yard and the RRTO, the preferred schematic layout of each of these facilities will be combined into a single site arrangement plan for the city’s review and consideration.

The conclusion of this task will be incorporated into the CEQA task for environmental studies and subsequent permitting. So, this task will need to be constrained to the specifics that will be analyzed in the EIR of Task 5.

Although much of our work in this task is anticipated to occur in virtual meetings, we have included time for up to three in-person workshops with City staff to identify current and future objectives for the Environmental Utility Operations Center and to review and refine the overall conceptual general arrangements. We anticipate the preparation of the combined overall site plan will require two of these meetings; one for initial presentation and discussion of benefits/limitations, and the second to incorporate the city’s input and to reach consensus of the preferred site before proceeding onto the CEQA task.

We will advance the utilities evaluation study to a conceptual level of design which will include a phasing plan for the sanitary sewer, potable water and power services to proposed facilities for the RRTO needs as defined in the City’s Phase 1 development. Upon development of the utility phasing concept, we will meet and review the conceptual design with the applicable parties.

Prior comments and responses will also be reviewed and discussed regarding implementation into the design. Deliverables will be provided in electronic format. 16 We will prepare a Concept Design Report that will discuss:
• Option(s) for the facilities layout:
o Overall development of known future features.
o Functional plan requirements.
o Design considerations.
o Basic facility construction.
o Specialty Finishes.
o Features.
o Benefits.
• Space requirements.
• Site and operations circulation.
• High/Planning level Construction Cost Estimate(s).
• Offsite improvements at a planning level
We will prepare a conceptual level opinion of probable cost for construction of the project as defined in the Concept Design Report. This estimate will be a Concept/Planning Level (Class 4, assuming equipment is not identified) estimate based on AACE which is a +50/-30% estimate utilizing HCSS estimating software. Design assumptions will be based upon the conceptual design. The draft opinion of probable cost for construction will be submitted to the City for consolidated comments before developing the final deliverable. Deliverables will be provided in electronic format.

Assumptions for Task 4:
a. Produce up to three (3) overall concept design layouts following City review and input. b. Two (2) rounds of revisions of concept review with the City are assumed. Internal QC comments and City comments will be consolidated and incorporated into the concept documents to prepare the Final Deliverables.

Deliverables for Task 4:
• Schematic design exhibits.
• Conceptual/Planning level opinions of probable cost.
• Conceptual Design Report.

TASK 5. Environmental Services
The purpose of Task 5 Environmental Services is to prepare an environmental analysis of the proposed future site development pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 17 The analysis will utilize the prior BODR for the RRTO and the Conceptual Site Design for the Corporation Yard/City Service Center. Develop Project kickoff, data review, and site visit. This will be accomplished by the following steps:
a. Create notice of preparation and scoping meeting.
b. Create Project description such that the subsequent state/regional permits and design efforts may proceed.
c. Prepare administrative draft EIR with Project description, CEQA required analysis, and alternatives analysis.
d. Develop final EIR, statement of overriding considerations, and mitigation monitoring and report plan.
e. Conduct public outreach meetings as defined below.

It is assumed that CEQA compliance with a stand-alone EIR that includes both Project-level and programmatic analysis, making maximum use of other analyses in the area, including the recent Sunset Area Plan EIR and the Roseville Industrial Park project EIR that is currently in preparation. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that the Project-level analysis will focus on the RRTO, administrative building, maintenance facility, vehicle charging stations, parking areas, and associated site improvements, whereas the programmatic analysis will focus on the optional organics processing system and potential future components and potential future phases of facility expansion. It is also assumed that 508 compliance is not required for the project but can be performed upon request and with amendment to this scope of work.

Task 5.1 Project Initiation and Scoping
Task 5.1.1 Project Kickoff, Data Review, and Site Visit The HDR PM Ascent’s PM and Project Director will attend one Project kickoff meeting with City, staff, and other members of the Project team to discuss the status of Project development and design, identify/confirm project objectives, areas of controversy and potential strategies, key issues and sensitivities and establish communication/review protocols. The general Project schedule will also be discussed. Coordinate with City staff to establish an agenda prior to the meeting. The kickoff meeting will provide the HDR Team an opportunity to inquire further about the Project, the process, and receive new or additional studies or documents.

Task 5.1.2 Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting
We will prepare a draft Notice of Preparation (NOP). At this time an Initial Study (IS) is assumed not to be necessary. The NOP will include a brief Project description, Project location, and a list of probable environmental effects. A draft NOP will be submitted to the City for review, incorporate comments received, and produce the final NOP for distribution. It is assumed that City staff will submit (electronically) the NOP to the Placer County Clerk-Recorder. It is anticipated the City maintains a mailing list of interested agencies and parties, and that NOP distribution will be the responsibility of the City.

We will prepare for and attend a scoping meeting and be available to discuss the EIR process, as needed. It is anticipated the City staff will arrange for the meeting space and prepare presentation materials pertaining to the project itself and its technical issues. We will prepare 18 materials (assumed to be portions of a PowerPoint presentation) pertaining to CEQA and the environmental process. Comment cards will be provided for use by meeting participants and notes of public and agency comments will be recorded. It is anticipated that verbatim recording or hire of a court reporter is not necessary. Public and agency notice of the meeting and logistics (location, times) will be the responsibility of the City.

Task 5.1.3 Project Description
We will utilize project information developed in the Strategic Planning tasks to prepare the EIR Project description as early in the process as possible to confirm that elements of the project are appropriately described. As a part of this effort, we will engage our Permitting staff who will have the responsibility to secure the various state and regional permits for the facility. The future permitting aspects of the project will need to be provided at the time the project description is being crafted, to capture insights and expectations we believe the local and state permitting agencies will require. In particular, these include requirements that CalRecycle and the Health Department will need for the future Solid Waste Facility Permit.

We will coordinate with City staff to fill in gaps identified. The EIR project description will identify Project objectives; Project characteristics, including permanent Project features and operational details; construction information such as phasing, timing (to the degree known), and equipment use; and a list of discretionary approvals expected to be needed for project implementation. The draft Project description will also describe existing characteristics and features of the site. A draft Project description will be submitted to the City for review and comment. Comments will be incorporated and a “final” Project description for use in the EIR.

Task 5.2 Draft EIR
Task 5.2.1 Prepare Administrative Draft EIR
Prepare the Administrative Draft EIR accordingly. The environmental setting and regulatory setting for each resource area will only focus on the issues of concern for the project. At this time, the EIR is proposed to include chapters addressing the following:

Introduction/Project Description
The Introduction will describe the history of the project and the environmental review process to date including a summary of past environmental documents for the project site. The Project description will include a list of required permitting actions, project characteristics, including on- and offsite components, infrastructure support required to serve the Project, schedule, operational characteristics, and other information relevant to an understanding of the Project.

Aesthetics and Visual Resources
The EIR analysis will describe how implementation of the Project would alter views of the site from nearby viewpoints and describe light- and glare-related impacts. The EIR will also describe the potential modification of views as a result of potential widening/paving of roadways to and from the Project site. Mitigation will be recommended to reduce or eliminate Project impacts, where necessary. Visual simulations are not anticipated to be required and are not included as part of this scope of work.

Land Use Planning and Agricultural Resources
19 It is anticipated that the Project may affect agricultural soils and/or lands that would be considered according to the State’s Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program. It will include a section that evaluates the project’s consistency with existing plans and zoning, addresses the potential loss of important farmland, and provides mitigation to address impacts where appropriate. It is assumed that forestry resources will be identified as an issue not evaluated further within the Draft EIR for this determination.

Air Quality
The project is located in Placer County, which is under the local air quality jurisdiction of the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). The EIR setting will include a description of existing air quality conditions in the Project area and the nearby vicinity. This will include information on the location of existing sensitive receptors (e.g., residences) and emission sources, ambient air quality concentration data from the applicable monitoring station(s), attainment designations, and natural factors that relate to the transport and dispersion of air pollutants. Applicable federal, state, and local regulations will also be presented, including thresholds of significance as recommended by PCAPCD and rules for which compliance will be required.

Consistent with the 2017 PCAPCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) will be used to estimate project-generated construction-related and operational-related emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors on a regional level for mobile and area source types (e.g., vehicle trip generation, natural gas usage, and landscape maintenance equipment). This modeling will be based on PCAPCD-recommended input parameters, project-specific operational data (e.g., type and size of proposed land uses, operational schedule), model default settings, and specific data from the traffic analysis (i.e.

VMT). The City’s preferred methodology for evaluating cumulative criteria air pollutant impacts diverges from the preferred PCAPCD approach as such the City’s approach when evaluating the proposed project will be utilized. It should be noted that the City’s approach is more consistent with other APCDs in the Sacramento Valley Air Basin. Evaluate potential mitigation measures, including those described in Appendices C and E of the PCAPCD handbook, as necessary to reduce the impacts of the proposed Project. To address the California Supreme Court decision in Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (Case No. S219783), additional discussion to draw the connection between the adequacy of the air quality analysis as it relates to health impacts will be included. No photochemical or air dispersion modeling is proposed for criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors.

Localized carbon monoxide (CO) impacts will be qualitatively addressed based on PCAPCD methodologies. Based on the anticipated level and type of development proposed, it is considered unlikely that CO modeling will be required.

The potential exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminant (TAC) and odor sources will be assessed quantitatively (e.g., air dispersion modeling and a formal health risk assessments will be performed). As part of the quantitative Human Reliability Assessment (HRA), perform air dispersion modeling using the American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD) to determine the average concentration of TACs at nearby receptors. Estimate levels of cancer risk, as well as the chronic and acute non-cancer risks, associated with exposure to these TAC concentrations using the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program, 20 Version 2 (HARP2). Risk levels will be estimated in accordance with the latest guidance from the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and PCAPCD. This scope of work assumes that pre-processed, representative AERMOD-ready meteorological data is available from PCAPCD.

We will prepare dispersion modeling and provide health risk estimates for one Project scenario and include modeling output and risk calculations. We will utilize this output to generate one set of risk isopleths. If the HRA indicates that nearby receptors would be exposed to an incremental increase in health risk that exceeds the thresholds recommended by PCAPCD, identify feasible measures to reduce the level of health risk at affected receptors. More specifically, the HRA will address diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) and other TACs emitted by operational sources at the site, including diesel-powered trucks operating in delivery areas, occasional testing of emergency backup diesel generators, and TACs emitted by either diesel-fueled or natural gas– fired boilers/generators. The quantity of diesel PM emitted by delivery trucks and other mobile sources, as well as boilers and backup diesel generators, will be estimated using guidance from PCAPCD and/or from another APCD (e.g., the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s Guidance for Air Dispersion Modeling). Estimate emissions from these TAC sources based on information provided by City staff.

Based on an initial evaluation of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) in the Project area, it is considered unlikely to occur, and prepare a qualitative assessment of potential impacts related to NOA.

With respect to odors, the proposed transfer and composting operations may result in odors, depending on the type of on-site operations that would occur. At present, it is assumed that the City’s composting operation would include design considerations to manage odors such that the EIR may rely on a qualitative analysis, provided by evidence in support of the manner in which composting would occur to manage odors. Dispersion modeling of potential odors can be conducted with an amendment to this scope and cost; however, odor dispersion modeling relies on TAC dispersion modeling techniques and may present an overly conservative analysis.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The EIR will discuss the current state of the science (e.g., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s [IPCC] Fifth Assessment Report) along with applicable regulatory framework (e.g., Assembly Bill [AB] 32, Senate Bill [SB] 375) and relevant guidance. In addition, the setting will describe the City’s Sustainability Action Plan (SAP), which was approved in February 2012. The SAP describes six areas targeted for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reduction: land use and green building, energy efficiency, recycling and waste reduction, transportation, water conservation, and marketing and education. Based on the GHG inventory conducted as part of the SAP, the largest percentage (44 percent) of Roseville’s GHG emissions are attributed to on- road mobile sources, with residential energy use comprising 22 percent of the GHG emissions inventory.

The analysis of climate change impacts will evaluate the GHG emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project. To the extent feasible, the analysis will also examine the project’s consistency with the General Plan, SAP policies, and assumptions in the SAP’s GHG emissions forecast. The EIR will also include a discussion of consistency with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) SCS. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a)(1), project generated GHG emissions will be estimated using CalEEMod. 21 This modeling will be based on the same assumptions used for the air quality analysis, i.e., PCAPCD-recommended input parameters, Project-specific construction data (e.g., type and size of proposed land uses, construction phasing schedule), model default settings, and specific data from the traffic analysis. GHG emissions modeling assumptions will be reconciled with those used in the GHG emissions inventory to provide consistency. If new additional, feasible mitigation measures are available that are specific to the proposed Project and were not identified in the SAP, those measures will be evaluated for potential to further reduce impacts of Project-related GHG emissions.

Biological Resources
The biological resources section will summarize the results of previous studies conducted at or near the project site, the observations made onsite during site reconnaissance surveys, local biological inventories, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) databases for local/regional sensitive species. Based on our current understanding of the site, the majority of the site is agricultural or nonnative grassland, similar to conditions elsewhere within the western portion of the City.

The environmental setting section of the biological resources section of the EIR will be prepared and will include an exhibit showing the location and extent of potential sensitive biological resources in the Project area. Potentially significant direct and indirect impacts on biological resources that could result from implementation of the proposed Project will be described.

Feasible and practical mitigation measures that would reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts on biological resources will be provided. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that a jurisdictional delineation of potential wetlands and/or other waters of the US/State will not be required.

Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
Conduct a cultural resources survey and report for the Project. Due to the potential for regulatory permitting related to work near Pleasant Grove Creek, it is assumed that compliance with National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 (36 CFR 800) will be necessary, in addition to CEQA requirements (California Code of Regulations [CCR] 14 Section 15064.5 and Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21083.2). Coordinate a records search at the California Historical Resources Information System’s North Central Information Center to identify previously recorded sites and previous cultural resource studies documented within a one-half- mile radius of the Project site. Additionally, a request of a sacred lands file search from the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) will be conducted. The NAHC will provide a list of tribal contacts that may have further information regarding the Project area. As part of the Section 106 process, submit a project information letter and location map to each tribal representative on the NAHC list.

Once background research has been completed, conduct an intensive pedestrian field survey of the Project site (~240 acres). An archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (36 CFR Part 61) will conduct the survey using transects spaced at maximum intervals of 15 meters. For purposes of this proposal, it is assumed a maximum of five archaeological resources will be identified; these resources will be recorded on the appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms and evaluated for California Register of Historical Resources eligibility. This proposal assumes no Phase 2 testing of archaeological sites. The cultural report will include 22 recommendations for additional cultural studies and provide management recommendations for the proposed Project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Locations of sensitive archaeological sites or Native American cultural resources depicted or described in the report will be considered confidential; the report may not be distributed to the public. The report will meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines and will follow Archaeological Resource Management Reports: Recommended Contents and Format guidelines.

As it relates to compliance with PRC Section 21080.3.1 (AB 52, Statutes of 2014), this scope of work assumes that the City will notify interested Native American tribes of the Project and conduct requested consultation. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is anticipated to assist with the preparation a letter template, one online meeting, and one on-site meeting as part of AB 52 consultation.

Prepare a cultural resources section for the EIR that will address archaeological, historical, and tribal cultural resources, including a discussion of the applicable federal, State, or local policies and regulations; a summary of the prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic-era setting of the Project area; a summary of the methods used to evaluate cultural resources; a description of known historic properties or archaeological resources; and a discussion of impacts and mitigation measures as needed. The analysis of archaeological and historical resources will be developed based on the cultural resources technical report, and the analysis of tribal cultural resources will be based on the outcome of AB 52 consultation, as described above. Based on the lack of existing structures within the Project boundaries, the potential for on-site historic structures is considered low.

Energy
Evaluate the potential for Project implementation to result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Coordinate with City staff to determine levels of energy consumption associated with construction and operation of the Project, including the consumption of diesel fuel, gasoline, natural gas, and electricity. Energy consumption estimates will be consistent with the methodologies used to estimate air pollutant and GHG emissions, including the use of CalEEMod. The City’s SAP and 2035 General Plan policies will be important to consider in this analysis, particularly in addressing the question of whether the Project would result in the wasteful use of energy or conflict with adopted renewable energy policies and/or plans.

Geology and Soils
This section will analyze potential Project-related environmental impacts related to soil stability, landslides, seismicity, and soil erosion. It is assumed the City will provide some information regarding historic geologic/geotechnical evaluations of the project area, or the EIR will be based on other available published information (soils maps, general plan discussions, etc.). The EIR will provide a brief description of the geologic setting, including soil characteristics, and topography. The EIR will describe groundwater monitoring system proposed as part of the Project, within its analysis. Feasible mitigation measures to reduce or avoid significant impacts will be provided. Potential impacts related to mineral resources as part of this section of the EIR will also be evaluated.
23 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The EIR will describe the existing site operations and will identify potential human exposure hazards associated with these operations. The potential for the Project to increase the use of hazardous materials or to increase the acceptance of hazardous materials will be identified. The requirement for the facility to prepare and implement a Hazardous Materials Business Plan will be discussed, including estimates on the types and/or quantities of hazardous materials being handled at the facility.

The storage, processing and composting of waste materials on the site can attract flies, rodents and other vectors. The effectiveness of these and other potential measures to manage vectors associated with the Project operations will be evaluated. In addition, other management practices will be identified, as appropriate.

Hydrology and Water Quality
The EIR will describe the existing hydrologic setting of the site and surrounding area. Local drainage conditions will be discussed, as well as the regulatory context for both drainage management and water quality. The information included in the previous EIR and recent planning documents regarding the site’s existing drainage characteristics will be summarized.

The existing drainage facilities that could be affected by the proposed Project will be identified.

Based on existing studies and documentation, this section will include an assessment of the water quality effects of implementing the Project, which may include composting, the processing of food waste on the site, the use of dry fermentation anaerobic digestion processes, the use of wet in-vessel digestion process, and the operation of biogas facilities. The EIR will also describe leachate and surface water monitoring systems as part of its analysis. Potential water quality degradation and soil erosion within the site’s drainage system associated with site construction and operations will be qualitatively described. The focus of the analysis will be on the operational components of the Project that could degrade water quality due to the volume of waste materials that would be processed on the site, although a discussion of potential construction effects and how management practices will be implemented may also be necessary. Original research, additional subsurface exploration, additional laboratory testing, and additional modeling are assumed to not be needed. Mitigation measures will be recommended for significant and potentially significant effects.

Noise and Vibration
The EIR setting will include a presentation of fundamental noise principles and descriptors; identification of applicable federal, State, and local regulations; and a description of existing noise and vibration conditions within the Project area and the nearby vicinity. Noise specialists will review the locations of nearby noise-sensitive receptors and rural residences. The noise setting will include identification of major noise sources in the area (e.g., vehicle traffic, agricultural activities), ambient noise levels, and natural factors that relate to the attenuation thereof. This information will be based on existing documentation and site reconnaissance, including short-term (i.e., 15-minute) noise measurements conducted for the Roseville Industrial 24 Park project to the east of the Project site. Other relevant noise data will also be used to characterize the noise setting in the Project area.

For Project-generated construction- and operation-related noise, reference measurement data for both airborne noise and ground vibration coupled with prediction methods will be used.

Noise impacts identified at the nearest noise-sensitive receptors will be identified, as necessary.

The noise specialist will work with the City to identify the appropriate standards to use in this evaluation.

Noise sources associated with the Project would include heavy off-road equipment (e.g., excavators, loaders, dozers), haul vehicles used to transport waste materials to and from the site, the processing and movement of waste materials on the site, and operation of various onsite facilities. Equipment noise estimates will be reviewed and analyzed using reference measurement data and standard attenuation rates to assess impacts at the nearest noise- sensitive receptors.

The significance of short-term and long-term noise impacts will be determined based on comparison to applicable regulations. Mitigation measures will be prepared, as needed, that clearly identify timing, responsibility, and performance standards. This scope of work does not include the assessment of specific abatement measures (e.g., exact sound barrier location and heights), as the level of effort cannot be determined at this time.

Population, Employment, and Housing
The EIR will describe the population of the region, as well as local and regional employment and housing statistics. The project is expected to provide jobs, which could increase demand for housing in Roseville, as well as in other nearby communities, including Rocklin, unincorporated Placer County, and potentially others. The focus of the impact discussion will be potential for growth inducement from construction of new uses. No housing would be displaced by the Project; therefore, this issue will be briefly discussed.

Public Services
The conversion of the Project site to municipal uses would result in an increased demand for public services, especially emergency services (police and fire). The EIR section will discuss the anticipated demand for services and analyze the capacity of the existing services to serve the Project, based on review of the City’s Municipal Service Review (MSR) (police and fire) and communication with service providers (including school districts). School enrollment and capacity information will be provided. This section will describe the Project’s potential to result in increased demands for public services including police, fire, emergency services, and recreational facilities such that new or expanded facilities might be constructed or that proposed facilities would result in significant impacts to the environment.

Public Utilities
The EIR section will discuss the potential demand for public utilities based on research, discussion with utilities providers, and review of the City’s MSR of the Project. Potential future demand from the proposed uses will be estimated to determine if the Project would result in substantial increases in the demand for water, water treatment, wastewater treatment, natural gas, and electricity supplies and infrastructure. This section will discuss impacts from the change in demand for these services. This section will include the extension of public utilities to 25 the site from the nearest terminus of public utilities which is understood to be near the intersection of Blue Oaks Boulevard and Westbrook Boulevard. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that utility extensions will be located within the roadway bounds of Phillip Road. If additional land area is necessary, including widening of Phillip Road or alternative routes for utility line extensions, amendment of this scope of work may be necessary. Based on the preliminary components of the Project, it is assumed that the potential water demand for on- site uses will not necessitate preparation of a formal water supply assessment (WSA).

Transportation and Circulation
The specialized traffic consultant will be utilized for the Transportation and Circulation portion of the EIR. We will analyze the transportation impacts of the Project based on its vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per recent updates to City transportation analysis practices. The City of Roseville General Plan DEIR (2020) utilized VMT per service population (i.e., residents plus employees) along with VMT per capita for citywide VMT estimation purposes. The updated Section 4 of the City’s Design Standards states the following: “Analysis may be based on an alternative metric (e.g., VMT/employee) provided it relies on the data and analysis of the current citywide VMT analysis and is reviewed and approved by the City.” It should be noted that the selection of VMT per employee requires a comprehensive citywide VMT calculation to calculate the citywide average. A modified approach could focus exclusively on municipal/industrial-type employees versus employees (which would include retail employees). The trip generation, distribution, study area, and methodology for the transportation analysis will be confirmed with City staff prior to initiating studies.

For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that the analysis will use the City’s travel forecasting model conversion factors for Public/Quasi-Public which is (3) employees per KSF. A comparison of the project’s VMT against baseline VMT will be established to determine if it exceeds thresholds. We will obtain and run the City’s travel demand model to obtain VMT information. VMT will be evaluated for Project and program level assessments. Consideration for moving existing services to the new facility will be included to account for the existing trips and trip lengths. A list of feasible mitigation measures that would either reduce impacts to below the threshold or reduce impacts would be provided and quantified to the extent feasible. These typically consist of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies focused on reducing the number of vehicle trips generated by the Project’s employees. The City of Roseville General Plan DEIR (2020) contains various TDM strategies that may be considered for the Project.

Following one round of review of the VMT analysis by the City, we will incorporate the analysis provided therein into the transportation section for the EIR.

Congestion Analysis
Although not required for the CEQA analysis, a limited amount of intersection operations (i.e., level of service [LOS]) analysis is recommended to determine how the Project would affect the City’s General Plan LOS policy. This study will be prepared in accordance with the City’s Design Standards for Traffic Impact Studies. The study will include level of service evaluation, site access design review, crash history, and traffic signal warrants as needed. Connections for bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities will also be included. The LOS traffic analysis is assumed to include up to 12 intersections in the vicinity. It is assumed new traffic counts will be collected and compared to available historical data. Planned roadway network changes and forecast volumes will be utilized for near term and long-term conditions, we will obtain turning 26 movement volumes for cumulative conditions from the City’s travel demand model. Peak hour analyses for existing, baseline (opening year), baseline plus project, baseline plus program, cumulative (including program), and cumulative plus project scenarios are assumed to be needed. Analysis will be performed using Synchro software using the methodology outlined in Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition.

This analysis would be prepared as a separate, stand-alone report (a draft Traffic Impact Study) to be submitted to the City for review and comment. Coordination with Placer County and other jurisdictions or agencies that may be affected by the study area will be included and given a chance to review the draft Traffic Impact Study. A comment review meeting will be held with City staff, and response to one set of consolidated comments will be generated on the draft. Hard copies and an electronic version of a final Traffic Impact Study will be submitted that includes changes based on comment resolution from the draft submittal. Fees for model use are included in the budget. However, the budget for this task does not include fees that may be required by the City to review and process the traffic impact study; those fees are assumed to be paid by others.

Wildfire
The EIR will include a section evaluating the potential effects related to wildfire using the questions included in the recently updated CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist. The analysis will consider the wildfire severity zones and policies in the Safety Element of the City’s General Plan. It is assumed that preparation of a site-specific evacuation analysis is not required, as the Project site not located within a high or very high fire hazard area.

Cumulative Impacts
Evaluate the impacts of cumulative development on the resource issues evaluated in the EIR.

To the degree feasible, incorporate the analysis included in the previous EIR. Work closely with City staff, as well as County staff, to establish the cumulative setting, which involves identification of a reasonably foreseeable related development based on existing land use diagrams and an accurate list of cumulative projects (proposed, approved, and under construction). The EIR section will also describe how the cumulative spatial context varies among, and even within, the various environmental issues areas.

Alternatives
The EIR will include a comprehensive discussion of feasible alternatives to the proposed Project. Up to four alternatives, including the No Project Alternative will be evaluated in the EIR.

The three action alternatives will be determined through consultation with the City and design team and will be based on reducing environmental impacts. Some preliminary evaluation of feasible design alternatives has already been completed, which will be considered as part of the CEQA analysis. However, CEQA requires that an EIR evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives that would reduce the significant impacts of the Project. This requirement may preclude certain, already-considered design alternatives from being considered alternatives pursuant to CEQA. Potential alternatives could include mitigated design and/or an offsite alternative. If it is determined that an offsite alternative is not feasible, the EIR will include a discussion describing why this conclusion was reached. Once a reasonable range of alternatives has been determined, each alternative will be analyzed at a level of detail less than 27 that of the proposed Project but will include adequate detail to allow a comparison of the impacts.

Growth Inducement
This section will qualitatively evaluate the Project’s potential to induce growth and subsequent environmental impacts that would occur (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126[d]). The Project is not expected to be growth inducing, per se, and the analysis will be brief. It is not anticipated that the composting activities at the site would be a source of substantial growth.

Significant and Unavoidable Impacts
This section will clearly and succinctly summarize significant and unavoidable environmental effects of the proposed Project and alternatives as evaluated in the EIR.

Other Sections Required by Statute
CEQA provides very specific requirements for the contents of an EIR. Provide the City with an EIR, containing sections required by CEQA. Sections required by CEQA not mentioned above include table of contents, an executive summary, an introduction, effects not found to be significant, a discussion of irreversible commitment of resources, references, and a list of individuals and agencies consulted. The EIR will include visual aids, such as maps and diagrams, to clearly present the environmental analysis to the decision makers, responsible agencies, and the public.

We will assemble sections of the EIR and produce one cohesive document. The document will comply with the City’s typical format and style. Submit a full Administrative Draft EIR and appendices, electronically, to the City for review.

It is assumed the City will provide one set of consolidated comments on the Administrative Draft EIR. Attend a meeting to discuss the City’s comments on the Administrative Draft EIR and approach to responses/revisions (see Phase 2, Task 2.2).

Task 5.2.2 Prepare Draft EIR
Based on one set of consolidated comments from the City, incorporate written comments on the Administrative Draft EIR to produce a Screen check Draft EIR for City review. Once one set of consolidated Screen check Draft EIR comments are received from City staff, incorporate those comments and produce a Draft EIR, along with the NOA and Notice of Completion (NOC) form for OPR. Consistent with the approach to the NOP (Task 1.4, above), it is assumed that the City will handle posting of the environmental review documents to its website, the County Clerk, and a local newspaper. Provide electronic copies of the Draft EIR, as well as 20 hardcopies for City use. We will prepare for, attend, and present at one public hearing on the Draft EIR. We will assist with describing the conclusions presented in the EIR and respond to questions on the EIR analysis. We will prepare materials (assumed to be portions of a PowerPoint presentation) pertaining to CEQA and the environmental process and provide comment cards for use by meeting participants. We will capture summary notes of public and agency comments. It is assumed that verbatim recording or hire of a court reporter is not necessary.

Task 5.3 Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Task 5.3.1 Administrative Final EIR
28 We will review the written and oral comments received during the Draft EIR comment period and respond to those comments. For budgetary purposes, 120 hours of professional technical staff time (excluding word processing/document production) have been assumed for preparing responses to comments. If comments require more effort than has been assumed in this scope, a contract amendment will be required. We will compile a standalone Administrative Final EIR that will include an introduction, summary of the Project, comment letters and oral testimony provided on the EIR, and responses to each raised environmental issue. A separate “Revisions to the Draft EIR” section will be included, if needed, to document changes or corrections to the text of the EIR. This scope of work assumes that the Draft EIR will not be reproduced within the Final EIR. Rather, the Draft EIR together with the response to comments document will constitute the Final EIR.

It is assumed that the City will provide one set of consolidated comments on the Administrative Final EIR. We will attend a meeting to discuss the City’s comments on the Administrative Final EIR and approach to responses/revisions (see Phase 3, Task 3.2).

Task 5.3.2 Final EIR
We will attend a meeting to review the comments on the Final EIR. The team will incorporate the comments received and will prepare the Public Final EIR. It is assumed that the City will handle distribution of the Final EIR to commenting agencies and interested parties, including local landowners, as appropriate. It should be noted that the City, as lead agency under CEQA, is only required to provide written responses to public agency comments received during public review of the EIR. Prepare the Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program (MMRP), based on the mitigation measures of the EIR, as amended through responses to comments. It is assumed that one draft and one final version of the MMRP would be provided electronically to the City, as well as 20 hardcopies of the Final EIR.

Key HDR Team members will attend and present at two (2) public hearings on the Final EIR and assist with describing the conclusions presented in the EIR and respond to questions on the EIR analysis.

Task 5.3.3 Prepare Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings We will prepare the CEQA Findings and, if there are significant and unavoidable impacts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC). The Findings/SOC will specify which mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project and those measures that have not and will explain why certain measures have been found to be infeasible. If applicable, the Findings/SOC will also identify feasible Project alternatives that could reduce adverse environmental effects but are not being implemented, with an explanation as to why they are considered to be infeasible. If requested, prepare an administrative draft of the Findings/SOC and will submit (electronically) to the City for review and comment. Once comments are received, we will incorporate comments and produce the final Findings/SOC.

We will prepare and post of the Notice of Determination (NOD) following Project and Final EIR approval and certification. It is assumed that the City would handle the CDFW filing fees associated with the NOD.
29 Meetings Requirements:
• Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings. The CEQA team will attend monthly PDT coordination meetings with City staff to confirm that the Project design is proceeding consistent with the CEQA Project description.
• Other Public Meetings/Outreach – assume three meetings: We will attend and prepare presentation materials for the following public meetings and prepare written meeting summaries: a Notice of Preparation/Public Scoping Meeting (assume one meeting); City of Roseville Public Utility Commission Meeting (assume one meeting), and Roseville City Council (assume one meeting).
• Notice of Preparation/Public Scoping Meetings.

HDR will prepare the CEQA Notice of Preparation (NOP). Prepare scoping meeting project overview information, develop and provide overview presentation and record public and agency comment received during the meeting(s). Prepare NOP Scoping Meeting Summaries as necessary to document the meeting(s) and comments received.

Assumptions for Task 5:

HDR assumes the following:
• Two (2) rounds of revisions of each of the Project description and Administrative Draft EIR from the City’s review. Internal QC comments and City comments will be consolidated and incorporated into the concept documents to prepare the Final deliverables.
• After finalization of the Project description, the overall scope of the Project remains unchanged as the preparation of the EIR proceeds.
• The EIR preparation efforts from commencement to publishing the Administrative Draft EIR can be accomplished in approximately nine (9) months. • Our support of the public engagement process is limited to the prerequisite notices and public meetings.
• No species or habitats of special concern are encountered at the site such that an extended field study schedule is required.
• The point of connection for off-site utilities is not known at this time. The CEQA analysis for off-site utilities is limited to the alignment of Phillips Road from the site to the existing utilities located near the intersection of Blue Oaks Boulevard and Westbrook Boulevard. The utility extension is assumed to occur within the paved road along Philip Road alignment. If the utility extension improvement alignment extends beyond the paved areas such that additional environmental assessments are necessary, such environmental assessments are beyond the scope of this proposal.

Deliverables for Task 5:

Meetings and Environmental Documents:
30 • Attend a Project kick off meeting and include scope for project coordination meetings as noted above.
• Execute requirements of Assembly Bill 52 and associated Tribal Consultation through the City as the CEQA lead agency.
• Review and incorporate available City of Roseville data in the environmental document. • Prepare a CEQA compliant Initial Study for the project, including technical studies/reports as necessary to determine level of CEQA review (IS/MND or EIR). • Prepare required CEQA Notices (NOP, NOC).
• Prepare and submit documents on the City’s behalf to the State Clearing House. • Prepare Final EIR, including responses to comments on the environmental document; the scope assumes up to 120 hours for comment review, development of responses to comments with one review cycle with client, and development of a Response to Comments appendix. Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations will also be included in Final EIR documentation.
• Prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Attend meetings (referenced above); and provide the following deliverables:
o Administrative Drafts (one Word file and one PDF file). o Screen Check Public Drafts (one PDF file).
o Public Draft (20 hard copies, one Word file, and one PDF file for internet posting). o Final documents and Response to Comments (20 hard copies, one Word file, and one PDF file for internet posting).

Phase 1B
The following tasks are deferred from the Phase 1A – Planning portion of the project until the CEQA task (Task 5) has been completed.

TASK 6. Preliminary Design and Basis of Design Report for the RRTO
These services are included but will be negotiated at a later date.

TASK 7. Permitting (HDR proposed task)
These services are included but will be negotiated at a later date.

TASK 8. Final Design of RRTO and Temporary Site Utilities These services are included but will be negotiated at a later date.

TASK 9. Construction Documents and Contracting Support for the RRTO Facilities
These services are included but will be negotiated at a later date. 31 TASK 10. Engineering Services During Construction and Construction Management
These services are included but will be negotiated at a later date.

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D029\P004\00077222.DOCX;03/29/2023]

EXHIBIT “B”

Exhibit B – Cost Information
City of Roseville

City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Operations Center ‐ Cost Proposal Summary Table Task # Task Description HDR Labor Subconsultants HDR Expenses Total 1 Project Management and Meetings 429,789.20 143,298.23 1,684.80 574,800.00 2 Strategic Planning Teams 290,342.00 116,295.90 8,697.50 415,400.00 3 Field Investigations and Data Collection 112,076.00 201,725.48 4,080.00 317,900.00 4 Conceptual Design 331,002.00 113,883.00 6,697.50 451,600.00 5 CEQA Environmental Services 77,744.00 593,889.45 ‐ 671,700.00 Total ‐ Without Option 1,240,953.20 1,169,092.05 21,159.80 2,431,400.00

3.5 Optional Groundwater Investigation ‐$ 498,867.60$ ‐ $ 498,900.00$

3.6 Optional Hydrogeoloic Investigation ‐$                        23,343.60$            ‐ $                        23,400.00$ Total ‐ With Option 1,649,699.20          2,375,732.10         27,857.30              2,930,300.00 HDR Detailed Labor Allocation Per Task
Employee Name Position Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Total Agnew, Ron Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             4.00           ‐            24.00         ‐              28.00 Bakke, Brian Senior Sci/Plan/Eng/Arch Levl IV ‐             8.00           ‐            ‐              ‐              8.00 Colominas, Sergio Senior Sci/Plan/Eng/Arch Levl IV ‐             ‐              8.00         40.00         ‐              48.00 Crosariol, Victor Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             ‐              94.00       ‐              ‐              94.00 Denton, Duane Quality Control 20.00          28.00         ‐            48.00         ‐              96.00 Edwards, David Drafting/CADD/BIM Level IV ‐             24.00         ‐            40.00         ‐              64.00 Eldredge, Dave Drafting/CADD/BIM Level V ‐             ‐              ‐            40.00         ‐              40.00 Farsad, Mehdi Senior Sci/Plan/Eng/Arch Levl III ‐             ‐              ‐            52.00         ‐              52.00 Gesell, Greg Senior Sci/Plan/Eng/Arch Levl III ‐             40.00         ‐            16.00         ‐              56.00 Hansen, Lynsee Accounting 100.00        ‐              ‐            ‐              ‐              100.00 Howie, Bruce Project Principal ‐             24.00         ‐            8.00           ‐              32.00 Inferrera, Augustine Sci/Plan/Eng Arch Levl I ‐             40.00         28.00       96.00         4.00           168.00 Iniguez Vazquez, Gustavo Sci/Plan/Eng Arch Levl I ‐             20.00         16.00       ‐              ‐              36.00 Keithley, Christina Project Principal 71.00          ‐              ‐            ‐              ‐              71.00 Kukharets, Maryan Sci/Plan/Eng Arch Levl I ‐             40.00         ‐            60.00         ‐              100.00 Kwan, Lock Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             60.00         22.00       50.00         4.00           136.00 Lambert, Michael Senior Sci/Plan/Eng/Arch Levl II ‐             28.00         ‐            160.00       ‐              188.00 Lari, Steven Drafting/CADD/BIM Level II ‐             ‐              ‐            40.00         ‐              40.00 Liles, Cindy Project Manager I ‐             96.00         20.00       84.00         116.00       316.00 McComb, Robb Senior Sci/Plan/Eng/Arch Levl IV ‐             8.00           8.00         52.00         ‐              68.00 Nguyen, Phoenix Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             4.00           ‐            28.00         ‐              32.00 Pappas, Karen Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             66.00         32.00       42.00         ‐              140.00 Putman, Adam Sci/Plan/Eng Arch Levl IV ‐             32.00         ‐            52.00         ‐              84.00 Pynn, Darren Corporation Yard Lead ‐             48.00         2.00         42.00         ‐              92.00 Raibley, Tim Project Management 440.00        280.00       20.00       140.00       116.00       996.00 Rebik, William Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             24.00         ‐            52.00         ‐              76.00 Rella, Bob Project Principal ‐             48.00         ‐            40.00         ‐              88.00 Rippy, Kris Project Controls 119.00        ‐              ‐            ‐              ‐              119.00 Rohr, Matt Assistance Project Manager 730.00        32.00         ‐            40.00         12.00         814.00 Roy, Amit Sci/Plan/Eng Arch Levl II ‐             40.00         24.00       48.00         ‐              112.00 Sachsenmaier, Zach Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             16.00         ‐            20.00         ‐              36.00 Satyal, Sagar Raj Sci/Plan/Eng Arch Levl I ‐             ‐              190.00     ‐              ‐              190.00 Stanley, Mark Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             ‐              44.00       ‐              ‐              44.00 Stratton, Rich Project Principal ‐             4.00           ‐            10.00         ‐              14.00 Winkler, Maika Administrative 100.00        8.00           ‐            8.00           ‐              116.00 Woo, Ed Principal Sci/Plan/Eng ‐             ‐              10.00       ‐              ‐              10.00 Total 1,580.00    1,022.00   518.00     1,332.00   252.00       4,704.00 Task 1.1 Task 1.2
Management   Client Meetings
Name Position Hourly Rate
Denton, Duane Quality Control 249.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 4,904.00$ Hansen, Lynsee Accounting 133.00 100.00 0.00 100.00             13,160.00$ Keithley, Christina Project Principal 343.00 36.00 35.00 71.00 23,827.60$ Raibley, Tim Project Management 384.00 320.00 120.00 440.00             165,792.00$ Rippy, Kris Project Controls 182.00 119.00 0.00 119.00             20,991.60$ Rohr, Matt Assistance Project Manager 264.00 630.00 0.00 730.00             189,654.00$ Winkler, Maika Administrative 118.00 100.00 0.00 100.00             11,460.00$ Total Hours 1305 155 1580.00
Total Fee $            341,943.20   $             56,962.00 429,789.20 Expenses Rate Total Total Fee
POV Mileage/Mile 0.585 2,880.00          1,684.80
Total Hours 2880
Total Fee + Markup 1,684.80
Task 1.1 Task 1.2
Management   Client Meetings
Name Subconsultant Hourly Rate
Janet Goodrich Jacobs 283.00 120.00 56.00 176.00 49,148.00$      262.50$           49,410.50$ Molly Paterson Jacobs 196.00 155.00 155.00 29,620.00$      29,620.00$ Kristi Neptun Jacobs 238.00 24.00 24.00 5,604.00$        5,604.00$ Jennifer McRae Jacobs 196.00 72.00 72.00 13,824.00$      13,824.00$ D. Brown Douglas Environmental 250.00 20.00 60.00 80.00 20,000.00$      20,000.00$ Neil Edgar Edgar & Associates 235.00 32.00 32.00 7,520.00$        7,520.00$ Evean Edgar Edgar & Associates 275.00 12.00 12.00 3,300.00$        3,300.00$ Rodney Fricke GEI 257.00 8.00 20.00 28.00 7,196.00$        7,196.00$ 136,212.00$    262.50$           143,298.23$
Total Labor Expenses Total Fee
2880
Total Hours
Task 1
Total Hours Total FeeProject Management and Meetings
Task 1 ‐ Project Management and Meetings
2880.00
Task 2.1 Task 2.2 Task 2.3 Task 2.4
Facility Functional
Strategy Team
Utilities Strategy
Team
Permitting Strategy
Team
Summary/Compilation
of Strategy Teams
Name Position Hourly Rate
Agnew, Ron BIM 249.00                       0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00                   940.00$ Bakke, Brian Organics 302.00                      8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00                   2,416.00$ Denton, Duane Quality Control 249.00                       20.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 28.00                 6,664.00$ Edwards, David CADD/BIM 172.00                       0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 24.00                 3,888.00$ Gesell, Greg MRF Equipment 258.00                       40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00                 9,680.00$ Howie, Bruce Alternative Technology 397.00                       24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00                 9,528.00$ Inferrera, Augustine Water Supply 132.00                       0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 40.00                 4,960.00$ Iniguez Vazquez, Gustavo Electrical Engineering 143.00                       0.00 16.00 0.00 4.00 20.00                 2,680.00$ Kukharets, Maryan Sci/Plan/Eng Arch Levl I 147.00                       40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00                 5,640.00$ Kwan, Lock Water Supply 314.00                       0.00 56.00 0.00 4.00 60.00                 17,760.00$ Lambert, Michael Lead Architecture 240.00                       24.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 28.00                 6,412.00$ Liles, Cindy Permitting/General 243.00                       24.00 8.00 40.00 24.00 96.00                 22,848.00$ McComb, Robb Lead Electrical Engineer 288.00                       0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00                   2,176.00$ Nguyen, Phoenix Design Management 356.00                       0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00                   1,332.00$ Pappas, Karen Water Supply 360.00                       0.00 62.00 0.00 4.00 66.00                 22,374.00$ Putman, Adam Lead Mechanical 210.00                       8.00 16.00 0.00 8.00 32.00                 6,336.00$ Pynn, Darren Corp Yard Lead 336.00                       40.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 48.00                 15,312.00$ Raibley, Tim Project Management 384.00                       90.00 20.00 90.00 80.00 280.00              102,480.00$ Rebik, William Lead Civil 284.00                       16.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 24.00                 6,456.00$ Rella, Bob Waste Facilities Designer 417.00                       40.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 48.00                 18,864.00$ Rohr, Matt Asst Project Manager 264.00                       8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 32.00                 8,064.00$ Roy, Amit Architecture 167.00                       40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00                 6,320.00$ Sachsenmaier, Zach Fire & Life Safety 313.00                       8.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 16.00                 4,736.00$ Stratton, Rich Water Supply 421.00                       0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00                   1,588.00$ Winkler, Maika Clerical Level II 118.00                       0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00                   888.00$ Total Hours 430 254 138 200 1022.00
Total Fee $               121,244.00   $                 66,126.00   $                44,476.00   $                  58,496.00 290,342.00 Expenses Rate Total Total Fee
Air Fare / Roundtrip 500.00                       4.00                  2,000.00 Airport Parking/day 20.00                          16.00                320.00 Car Rental/Week 275.00                       4.00                  1,100.00 Lodging/Day 159.00                       16.00                2,544.00 Meals/Day 71.00                          16.00                1,136.00 Mileage 0.585                          500.00             292.50 Tech Fees (billed per labor hour) 3.70                            200.00 740.00 Copies/Page 8.5x11 Color 0.45                            500.00 225.00 Copies/Page 11x17 Color 0.90                            100.00 90.00 Express Mail 25.00                          10.00 250.00 Total Hours 1366
Total Fee + Markup 8,697.50
500.00
100.00

10.00 1366
200.00
Task 2
Total Hours Total FeeStrategic Planning Teams
Task 2 ‐ Strategic Planning Teams

4.00 16.00

16.00 500.00
Task 2 Continued
Task 2.1 Task 2.2 Task 2.3 Task 2.4
Facility Functional
Strategy Team
Utilities Strategy
Team
Permitting Strategy
Team
Summary/Compilation
of Strategy Teams
Name Subconsultant Hourly Rate
Janet Goodrich Jacobs 283.00                      50.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 160.00 43,520.00$      43,520.00$ Marie Silveira Jacobs 259.00                      48.00 48.00 11,952.00$      11,952.00$ Marielle Coquia Jacobs 313.00                      6.00 6.00 1,806.00$        1,806.00$ Administrative Staff Jacobs 105.00                      4.00 4.00 404.00$           404.00$ Technical Edititor Jacobs 196.00                      12.00 12.00 2,256.00$        2,256.00$ Neil Edgar Edgar and Associates 235.00                      32.00 32.00 7,520.00$        7,520.00$ Evan Edgar Edgar and Associates 275.00                      12.00 12.00 3,300.00$        3,300.00$ D. Brown Douglas Environmental 250.00                      60.00 60.00 15,000.00$      15,000.00$ GEI 25,000.00$
Total Fee 85,758.00$      ‐ $                  116,295.90$ Total Labor Expenses Total FeeTotal Hours
Task 3.1 Task 3.2 Task 3.3 Task 3.4 Task 3.5 Task 3.6 Data
Collection
Survey and
Mapping   Geotechnical
PL Extension
Alignment
Evaluation
Existing Well
Evauation ‐
Optional Task
Hydrogeoloic
Investigation ‐
Optional Task
Name Position Hourly Rate
Colominas, Sergio Architecture 315.00            8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00                   2,416.00$ Crosariol, Victor Architecture 218.00            0.00 0.00 94.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.00                20,492.00$ Inferrera, Augustine Water Supply 132.00            12.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 28.00                3,472.00$ Iniguez Vazquez, Gustavo Electrical Engineer 143.00            16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.00                2,144.00$ Kwan, Lock Water Supply 314.00            6.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 22.00                6,512.00$ Liles, Cindy Permitting/General 243.00            20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00                4,760.00$ McComb, Robb Lead Electrical 288.00            8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00                   2,176.00$ Pappas, Karen Principal Sci/Plan/Eng 360.00            8.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 32.00                10,848.00$ Pynn, Darren Corp Yard Lead 336.00            2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00                   638.00$ Raibley, Tim Project Manager 384.00            20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00                7,320.00$ Roy, Amit Architecture 167.00            24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00                3,792.00$ Satyal, Sagar Raj Geotechnical 148.00            0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190.00              28,120.00$ Stanley, Mark Geotechnical 376.00            0.00 0.00 44.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.00                15,796.00$ Woo, Ed Geotechnical 385.00            0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00                3,590.00$ Total Hours 124 0 338 56 0 0 518.00
Total Fee $     29,222.00   $                   ‐    $    67,998.00   $      14,856.00   $                   ‐    $                    ‐    112,076.00 Expenses Rate Total Total Fee
Truck Rental/mo. (includes gas + mileage) 1,500.00         1.00                  1,500.00 Field Supplies 50.00               10.00               500.00 Well Permits 130.00            16.00               2,080.00 Total Hours 27
Total Fee + Ma 4,080.00
Task 3.1 Task 3.2 Task 3.3 Task 3.4 Task 3.5 Task 3.6 Data
Collection
Survey and
Mapping   Geotechnical
PL Extension
Alignment
Evaluation
Existing Well
Evauation ‐
Optional Task
Hydrogeoloic
Investigation ‐
Optional Task
Name Subconsultant Hourly Rate
Chris Petersen GEI 342.00            0.00 ‐$                   ‐$ Rodney Fricke GEI 257.00            0.00 ‐$                   ‐$ Staff Geologist GEI 171.00            0.00 ‐$                   ‐$ Staff Geologist GEI 156.00            0.00 ‐$                   ‐$ Word Processor GEI 127.00            0.00 ‐$                   ‐$ Jacobs Jacobs 105,279.50$     105,279.50$
Geotechnical Driller 69,700.00 $      69,700.00$       69,700.00$ Geotechnical Laboratory 17,140.00 $      17,140.00$       17,140.00$ Existing Well Eval Option Pump Contractor 350,000.00$   330,000.00$    330,000.00$ *Not included in total Existing Well Eval Option GEI 125,112.00$   125,112.00$    125,112.00$ *Not included in total Hydrogeological Invest Opti GEI 22,232.00$       22,232.00$      22,232.00$     *Not included in total Total Fee 475,112.00 $    22,232.00$       192,119.50$     ‐ $                 201,725.48$ Total Labor Expenses Total FeeTotal Hours
Task 3
Total Hours Total Fee
Field Investigations and Data Collection
Task 3 ‐ Field Investigations and Data Collection

1.00 10.00

16.00 Task 4.1 Task 4.2 Task 4.3 Task 4.4
Conduct Workshops
Analyze Growth
Projections / Devlop
Initial Design Concept
Prepare Project
Concept Design
Report
Cost Estimate Based on
Report
Name Position Hourly Rate
Agnew, Ron Principal Sci/Plan/Eng 249.00                  0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00                 5,640.00$ Colominas, Sergio Architecture 315.00                  20.00 14.00 6.00 0.00 40.00                 12,080.00$ Denton, Duane Quality Control 249.00                  24.00 0.00 8.00 16.00 48.00                 11,424.00$ Edwards, David CADD/BIM Architecture 172.00                  0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 40.00                 6,480.00$ Eldredge, Dave CADD/BIM Structural 196.00                  0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00                 7,400.00$ Farsad, Mehdi Lead Structural 268.00                  12.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 52.00                 13,104.00$ Gesell, Greg MRF Equipment 258.00                  0.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00                 3,872.00$ Howie, Bruce Alternative Technology 397.00                  0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00                   3,176.00$ Inferrera, Augustine Wate Supply 132.00                  8.00 16.00 44.00 28.00 96.00                 11,904.00$ Kukharets, Maryan Civil Engineer 147.00                  0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00                 8,460.00$ Kwan, Lock Water Supply 314.00                  6.00 12.00 20.00 12.00 50.00                 14,800.00$ Lambert, Michael Lead Architect 240.00                  40.00 80.00 40.00 0.00 160.00              36,640.00$ Lari, Steven Drafting/CADD/BIM Level II 139.00                 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00                 5,240.00$ Liles, Cindy Permitting/General 243.00                  16.00 24.00 20.00 24.00 84.00                 19,992.00$ McComb, Robb Lead Electrical 288.00                  12.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 52.00                 14,144.00$ Nguyen, Phoenix Design Management 356.00                  12.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 28.00                 9,324.00$ Pappas, Karen Water Supply 360.00                  6.00 8.00 20.00 8.00 42.00                 14,238.00$ Putman, Adam Lead Mechancial 210.00                  12.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 52.00                 10,296.00$ Pynn, Darren Corporation Yard Lead 336.00                  2.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 42.00                 13,398.00$ Raibley, Tim Project Manager 384.00                  40.00 40.00 40.00 20.00 140.00              51,240.00$ Rebik, William Lead Civil 284.00                  12.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 52.00                 13,988.00$ Rella, Bob Waste Facilities Designer 417.00                  0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00                 15,720.00$ Rohr, Matt Asst. Project Manager 264.00                  16.00 4.00 16.00 4.00 40.00                 10,080.00$ Roy, Amit Architecture 167.00                  8.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 48.00                 7,584.00$ Sachsenmaier, Zach Fire & Life Safety 313.00                  8.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 20.00                 5,920.00$ Stratton, Rich Water Supply 421.00                  0.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 10.00                 3,970.00$ Winkler, Maika Clerical Level II 118.00                  0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00                   888.00$ Total Hours 254 242 722 114 1332.00
Total Fee $                  68,352.00   $                      60,224.00   $               174,048.00   $                      28,378.00 331,002.00 Expenses Rate Total Total Fee
Airport Parking/day 20.00                    16.00                320.00 Car Rental/week 275.00                  4.00                  1,100.00 Lodging/day 159.00                  16.00                2,544.00 Measl/day 71.00                    16.00                1,136.00 POV Mileage/mile 0.585                    500.00             292.50 Tech Fees (billed per labor hour) 3.70                       200.00             740.00 Copies/Page 8.5x11 Color 0.45                       500.00 225.00 Copies/Page 11x17 Color 0.90                       100.00 90.00 Express Mail 25.00                    10.00 250.00
100.00

10.00 500.00
Task 4
Total Hours Total Fee
Conceptual Design
Task 4 ‐ Conceptual Design

16.00 4.00

16.00 16.00
500.00
200.00
Task 4 Continued
Total Hours 1362
Total Fee + Marku 6,697.50
Task 4.1 Task 4.2 Task 4.3 Task 4.4
Conduct Workshops
Analyze Growth
Projections / Devlop
Initial Design Concept
Prepare Project
Concept Design
Report
Cost Estimate Based on
Report
Name Subconsultant Hourly Rate
Janet Goodrich Jacobs 283.00                  100.00 25.00 90.00 10.00 225.00 61,200.00$      300.00$           61,500.00$ Gregory Mah‐Hing Jacobs 313.00                  40.00 40.00 12,040.00$      12,040.00$ Rob Wright Jacobs 196.00                  24.00 24.00 4,512.00$        4,512.00$ Marie Silveira Jacobs 259.00                  38.00 16.00 54.00 13,446.00$      13,446.00$ Jonathan Hess Jacobs 196.00                  40.00 6.00 46.00 8,648.00$        8,648.00$ Administrative Staff Jacobs 105.00                  4.00 2.00 6.00 606.00$           606.00$ Technical Edititor Jacobs 196.00                  8.00 8.00 16.00 3,008.00$        3,008.00$ Jordan Norris Jacobs 196.00                  25.00 25.00 4,700.00$        4,700.00$ Total Fee 108,160.00$    300.00$           113,883.00$
Total Labor Expenses Total Fee
1362
Total Hours
Task 5 Task 5.1 Task 5.2 Task 5.3 Task 5.4
Projet Description   Intial Study   Draft EIR Engagement MMP Name Position Hourly Rate
Inferrera, Augustine Water Supply 132.00              4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00                   515.20$ Kwan, Lock Water Supply 314.00              4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00                   1,232.00$ Liles, Cindy Permitting/General 243.00              40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.00 116.00              28,721.60$ Raibley, Tim Project Manager 384.00              40.00 8.00 16.00 40.00 12.00 116.00              44,126.40$ Rohr, Matt Asst. Project Manager 264.00              2.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 12.00                3,148.80$ Total Hours 90 30 40 62 30 252.00
Total Fee $           27,392.00   $            8,520.00   $      12,088.00   $       20,692.80   $           9,051.20 77,744.00 Expenses Rate Total Total Fee
Total Hours
Total Fee + Ma
Task 5 Task 5.1 Task 5.2 Task 5.3 Task 5.4
Projet Description   Intial Study   Draft EIR Engagement MMP Name Subconsultant Hourly Rate
Janet Goodrich Jacobs 283.00              70.00 70.00 19,040.00$      150.00$           19,190.00$ Marie Silveira Jacobs 259.00              16.00 16.00 3,984.00$        3,984.00$ Jonathan Hess Jacobs 196.00              4.00 4.00 752.00$           752.00$ D. Brown Douglas 250.00             12.00 100.00 32.00 40.00 184.00 46,000.00$      46,000.00$ Neil Edgar Edgar & Associates 235.00              40.00 8.00 2.00 50.00 11,750.00$      11,750.00$ Evan Edgar Edgar & Associates 275.00              8.00 4.00 12.00 3,300.00$        3,300.00$ Omar Shafie Edgar & Associates 165.00              35.00 35.00 5,775.00$        5,775.00$ Ascent 474,858.00$
Total Fee 150.00$                  90,601.00$      150.00$           593,889.45$ Task 5
Total Hours Total FeeCEQA Environmental Services
Task 5 ‐ CEQA Environmental Services
Total Labor Expenses Total FeeTotal Hours
Task 5 Task 5.1 Task 5.2 Task 5.3 Task 5.4
Projet Description   Intial Study   Draft EIR Engagement MMP Name Position Hourly Rate
Inferrera, Augustine Water Supply 132.00              4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00                   515.20$ Kwan, Lock Water Supply 314.00              4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00                   1,232.00$ Liles, Cindy Permitting/General 243.00              40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.00 116.00              28,721.60$ Raibley, Tim Project Manager 384.00              40.00 8.00 16.00 40.00 12.00 116.00              44,126.40$ Rohr, Matt Asst. Project Manager 264.00              2.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 12.00                3,148.80$ Total Hours 90 30 40 62 30 252.00
Total Fee $           27,392.00   $            8,520.00   $      12,088.00   $       20,692.80   $           9,051.20 77,744.00 Expenses Rate Total Total Fee
Total Hours
Total Fee + Ma
Task 5 Task 5.1 Task 5.2 Task 5.3 Task 5.4
Projet Description   Intial Study   Draft EIR Engagement MMP Name Subconsultant Hourly Rate
Janet Goodrich Jacobs 283.00              70.00 70.00 19,040.00$      150.00$           19,190.00$ Marie Silveira Jacobs 259.00              16.00 16.00 3,984.00$        3,984.00$ Jonathan Hess Jacobs 196.00              4.00 4.00 752.00$           752.00$ D. Brown Douglas 250.00             12.00 100.00 32.00 40.00 184.00 46,000.00$      46,000.00$ Neil Edgar Edgar & Associates 235.00              40.00 8.00 2.00 50.00 11,750.00$      11,750.00$ Evan Edgar Edgar & Associates 275.00              8.00 4.00 12.00 3,300.00$        3,300.00$ Omar Shafie Edgar & Associates 165.00              35.00 35.00 5,775.00$        5,775.00$ Ascent 474,858.00$
Total Fee 150.00$                  90,601.00$      150.00$           593,889.45$ Task 5
Total Hours Total FeeCEQA Environmental Services
Task 5 ‐ CEQA Environmental Services
Total Labor Expenses Total FeeTotal Hours

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2680
File #:
0800-05
Title:

Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) - Engagement Agreement Contact:

Jesse Ravera 916-774-5125 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Engagement Agreement with Hilco IP Services LLC dba Hilco Streambank (Hilco Streambank) to broker the sale and transfer of excess City of Roseville owned Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) addresses. Staff further requests authority for the City Manager, or his designee, to execute any related forms and agreements needed to effectuate the transactions.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville currently has 57,344 Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) addresses that are not in use and are not anticipated to be needed by the City in the future. RFP 12-025 was released to solicit responses from American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) approved brokers to facilitate the sale and transfer of these available IP addresses. The City received three responses and after evaluation selected
Hilco IP Services LLC dba Hilco Streambank (Hilco
Streambank)
to facilitate the sale based on the qualifications of the company and the projected total benefit to the City.

Based on the agreement, Hilco Streambank will facilitate the auction/sale of blocks of available IP addresses to the highest bidder to maximize benefit to the City for the rate of 3% commission of the total sales price.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City will sell between 32,766 and 57,344 IP addresses with a minimum sale price of $43 per IP address. The net proceeds of approximately $1.4 million to $2.4 million will be deposited into the Information Technology Replacement Fund
to be used for future technology replacement
projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

Respectfully Submitted,
Jesse Ravera, Assistant Information Technology Director Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-155
Engagement Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 23-155

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

HILCO IP SERVICES, LLC DBA HILCO STREAMBANK, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT AND ANY RELATED FORMS AND AGREEMENTS

NEEDED TO EFFECTUATE THE TRANSACTIONS, ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an IPv4.Global Engagement Agreement for the sale and transfer of excess City of Roseville owned Internet Protocol Numbers (IP Addresses), by and between the City of Roseville and Hilco IP Services, LLC dba Hilco Streambank, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said IPv4.Global Engagement Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute any related forms and agreements needed to effectuate the transactions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2670
File #:
0214 & 0716
Title:

Building Forward Library Facilities Improvement Program - Grant Application Contact:

Natasha Martin 916-774-5234 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve submission of a grant application for California State Library's Building Forward Library Facilities Improvement Program:

Round Two funding.

BACKGROUND
The Building Forward Library Facilities Improvement Program helps create local libraries capable of meeting the 21st century needs of California's communities. In this round there will be $175,000,000 in competitive grant funding available. The deadline to apply for round two funding is May 18, 2023. Awarded funds must be expended by June 30, 2027.

Applications are accepted for any library facility-related capital project that addresses critical maintenance needs, improves energy efficiency, improves sustainability, expands digital access or expands physical access. Priority will be given to projects supporting high poverty areas of the state, although projects are not limited to those criteria.

Grantees may request a reduction in the required local match according to conditions included in the California Budget Act of 2022. Roseville qualifies for a reduction that requires the City to contribute 20% of the total cost for these proposed capital projects, and will apply for the match reduction upon submission of the grant application.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total matching requirements for each project are as follows: Martha Riley Community Library, $412,759, Maidu Library, $609,106, and Downtown Library, $905,298. The matching funds for these projects will be included in future Capital Improvement Plan funding for the General Fund.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Natasha Martin, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-149
Application Approval & Certification
Building Forward Project Summary
RESOLUTION NO. 23-149

APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY

FOR THE BUILDING FORWARD LIBRARY FACILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL CONTRACT

DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program referenced above; and

WHEREAS, the California State Library has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and

WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California State Library require a resolution certifying the approval by the potential grantee’s governing board either before submission of said application(s) to the State or prior to execution of the grant agreement; and

WHEREAS, The City of Roseville, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the project; and

WHEREAS, The City of Roseville proposes to implement Building Forward Facilities Improvement Program: Round Two; and

WHEREAS, The City of Roseville has the legal authority and is authorized to enter into a funding agreement with the State of California; and

WHEREAS, The City of Roseville intends to apply for grant funding from the California State Library for the Building Forward Facilities Improvement Program: Round Two;

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville authorize as follows:

1. That pursuant and subject to all of the terms and provisions of the California Budget Act, the City of Roseville City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and file an application for funding with the California State Library, and take such other actions necessary or appropriate to obtain grant funding.

2. The City of Roseville City Manager, or designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute the funding agreement with the California State Library and any amendments thereto.

3. The City of Roseville City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to submit any required documents, funding requests, and reports required to obtain grant funding; and

4. Certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), legal requirements for building codes, health and safety codes, the California Labor Code, disabled access laws, and, that prior to commencement of the project, all applicable permits will have been obtained.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this __ day of _____________________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

___________________________
City Clerk

Building Forward Library Facilities Improvement Program: Round Two Grant Overview

Martha Riley Community Library
The Martha Riley Community Riley serves the expanding west side of Roseville, and the adjacent unincorporated areas of Placer County. The location serves over 300,000 visitors and circulates 600,000 items annually. It accounts for close to 60% of all visitation and circulation in our three libraries. The facility is heavily impacted by the City's growth, and reconfiguration of spaces to meet community needs is required. In addition there are a few critical maintenance issues that need to be addressed, such as replacing the existing HVAC system installed in 2008, new gutters, additional security features and LED lighting.

This project will allow us to reconfigure our interior spaces to better meet the needs of the community.

We currently do not have a programming space to accommodate attendance for our children and teen programming. We conduct programs outside weather permitting, due the large number of families attending. For example, we typically have over 100 in attendance at storytime outside, but have to greatly limit participation indoors. We also have a need for expanded shelving for materials, and to create smaller study spaces and an expanded teen area, as we are within walking distance to a local high school. Facility maintenance needs, such as a new HVAC, new gutters, upgraded lighting and security systems have not been replaced since the building was constructed in 2008.

Description Project Cost Grant Contribution Match Contribution

Replace HVAC system $698,750 $559,000 $139,750
Reconfigure interior shelving,
program and study spaces
$712,725 $570,180 $142,545
Security upgrades $177,375 $141,900 $35,475
Gutter replacement $43,000 $34,400 $8,600
Interior LED Lighting upgrades $161,250 $129,000 $32,250 Stairway maintenance $64,500 $51,600 $12,900
Subtotal $1,857,600 $1,486,080 $371,520
Contingency 10% $185,760 $148,608 $37,152
Grant Administration $20,434 $16,347 $4,087

Grand Total $2,063,794 $1,651,035 $412,759

Maidu Library
Maidu Library is the smallest of Roseville's three branches, and has outgrown the facility that was built in 1990. At only 10,000 square feet the facility is inadequate in meeting the needs of the community, lacks in space for materials, space for programs and study spaces, and does not have a children's or teen area suitable for the population who frequent this facility. As our second busiest location, we have long ago outgrown the space and have to limit the services we can offer to the east side of Roseville.

When the Maidu Library was constructed in 1990, there were 44,000 residents in the City of Roseville.

Today there are 151,000 residents. The Maidu Branch serves the east and central regions of the City, as well as the outlying areas of Placer County. The bulk of this project cost is to add up to 6,000 additional square feet of space to the existing 10,000 square feet. We currently have no room to add more book shelves, study space, program space or children's and teen areas. Maidu Library is by far our smallest branch in the City, but its circulation and visitation exceeds our much larger Downtown Library. The demographics of the community have shifted over the past five years, and more families are buying homes and moving into the surrounding neighborhood. The branch is also in walking distance to a high school and middle school, and we need program space, study space and teen areas to better meet the needs of this community. In addition, there are existing critical maintenance items that need to be addressed, such as a new roof, upgraded security alarm system and upgrades to exterior and interior LED lighting fixtures.

Description Project Cost Grant Contribution Match Contribution

Expand Library footprint $2,246,750 $1,797,400 $449,350 New Roof Installation $161,250 $129,000 $32,250
ADA restroom upgrades $80,625 $64,500 $16,125
Security Upgrades $86,000 $68,800 $17,200
LED Lighting upgrades $166,625 $133,300 $33,325
Subtotal $2,741,250 $2,193,000 $548,250
Contingency 10% $274,125 $219,300 $54,825
Grant Administration $30,154 $24,123 $6,031

Grand Total $3,045,529 $2,436,423 $609,106

Downtown Library
The Downtown Library, constructed in 1979, is in need of several critical maintenance repairs and building reconfiguration to serve the population in Roseville's core neighborhood. As part of a revitalized downtown Roseville, serving our most at-risk and economically challenged residents is a priority. We need to address deferred maintenance projects, such as a new HVAC system, new exterior siding and windows, upgrade lighting and other critical infrastructure needs which will greatly improve the quality of service to our residents. This location serves as the City's Cooling Center during the summer months, and needs a highly functional HVAC system.

If awarded, these grant funds will serve to address critical building maintenance improvements and improve energy efficiency to the 1979 structure. Deferred maintenance projects that are critical include an updated, efficient HVAC system, new siding, windows and doors, and upgraded restrooms to meet current ADA guidelines. We plan to greatly improve energy efficiency in the facility by installing solar panels with battery backup, so that we have a constant power source. As the City's official Cooling Center, is critical that we have reliable power at all times. We will also upgrade lighting to LED fixtures, and reroof the building. This project will help us reconfigure interior spaces to better serve our customer’s needs. Customer usage has changed in the last 40+ years since the building was constructed, and needs have changed since the pandemic. This funding will allow us to offer programming space to be used for all ages programming, and allow us to create more small study spaces for online meetings, job interviews, adult literacy sessions and tutoring. Funding will also provide security enhancements such as additional interior cameras, improved public service desk locations and security key card readers to access staff work areas.

Description Project Cost Grant Contribution Match Contribution

Replace HVAC, install backup
generator, install fencing
around units
$677,250 $541,800 $135,450
New Roof Installation $322,400 $258,000 $64,500
Replace Siding and Insulation $1,075,000 $860,000 $215,000 Install New Generator $322,500 $258,000 $64,500
Public Service Desk relocation,
new safe room on main floor
$225,750 $180,600 $45,150
Upgrade Key Card Readers $43,000 $34,400 $8,600
Install rooftop solar panels,
add battery backup
$215,000 $172,000 $43,000
Replace windows and doors $387,000 $258,000 $64,500
ADA restroom upgrades $161,250 $129,000 $32,250
Subtotal $4,074,250 $3,259,400 $814,850
Contingency 10% $407,425 $325,940 $81,485
Grant Administration $44,817 $35,853 $8,963

Grand Total $4,526,492 $3,621,193 $905,298

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2676
File #:
0709-05 & 0214
Title:

Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Grant Agreement Amendment Contact:

Trisha Isom 916-746-1239 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.14.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing contract amendment between AMI Housing and the City for an extension of the contract from June 30, 2023 to June 30, 2024 and adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
On May 18, 2022, City Council approved the FY2022-23 Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) funding allocations, which included an agreement with AMI Housing for a grant of $500,000. HPRR programs provide temporary assistance to prevent an individual or family from losing permanent housing and provide temporary assistance to homeless individuals and families in obtaining permanent housing. Eligible services for this grant funding include temporary rental assistance, short-term hotel vouchers, housing relocation and stabilization services, housing navigation services, mediation, outreach and incentives to property owners, credit repair, security deposits, utility payments, and case management related to these activities.

These services are extremely effective in reducing the financial burden and trauma of homelessness.

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) is collaborating with AMI Housing to use up to $50,000 of their HPRR funding to help fund the new Landlord Incentive Program. Participating property owners will receive a one-time $1,000 payment each time they enter into a lease and contract with a Housing Choice Voucher holder. HUD’s Emergency Housing Voucher’s (EHV) came with services fees that allowed for a similar incentive program that proved extremely effective in leasing the EHVs.

The new program is meant to encourage private landlords to participate in the Housing Choice Voucher Program and create more available units for all voucher holders. The proposed contract amendment requests to extend the contract through June 30, 2024 to allow for use of the remaining funds. The extension of the contract requires no additional funds at this time.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing grant program is funded with State of California Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding for the Cities of Roseville and Rocklin and the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (Low/Mod funds). The program significantly reduces instances and durations of homelessness in Roseville and Rocklin and has reduced costs to the cities and to the community as a whole. No General Fund resources were used for the original contract and the recommended action does not result in any cost to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of AMI Housing’s grant agreement amendment does not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Trisha Isom, Housing Manager
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-152
AMIH HPRR Agreement Amendment
RESOLUTION NO. 23-152

APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, BY AND BETWEEN AMI HOUSING, INC. AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a First Amendment to Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between AMI Housing, Inc. and the City of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said First Amendment to Grant Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2660
File #:
0900-04-02
Title:

Bridge Preventative Maintenance Project - Notice of Completion Contact:

Nicolas Bumb 916-746-1313 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Project as complete and adopt a resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Bridge Preventative Maintenance Project included rehabilitation of 16 bridges at various locations. Methacrylate bridge deck treatment has been applied to 15 of the bridges (methacrylate bridge deck treatment is intended to seal and protect the structural integrity of bridges and extend their service life). Other spot repairs included minor concrete surface repairs, joint seal replacement, and minor bridge approach paving.

The bridges for this project are located on the following roads:

3 locations on Roseville Pkwy,
·

2 locations on Harding Blvd,
·

2 locations on Foothills Blvd,
·

Atkinson St,
·

Blue Oaks Blvd,
·

Lincoln St,
·

N Sunrise Ave,
·

Old Auburn Rd,
·

Secret Ravine Pkwy,
·

Vernon St,
·

Wills Rd, and
·

Woodcreek Oaks Blvd.

Exact locations may be seen in the attached Exhibit A.

At the March 21, 2021 meeting, Council approved the plans and specifications for the project and authorized staff to call for bids. At their September 21, 2022 meeting, Council awarded the project to American Civil Constructors. Notice to proceed on the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Project was issued October 7, 2022 and construction was completed April 8, 2023.

The Public Works Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Project and has found the work to be completed in accordance with the improvement plans and City Specifications and is now ready for acceptance. As required by the Specifications and Faithful Performance Bond, the Contractor shall guarantee the installation of all improvements for a period of 12 months from the date of the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was funded by a Highway Bridge Program (HBP) grant and City Roadway Funds. No General Fund resources were used for this project.

Staff are completing the final accounting of project costs and will submit a final reimbursement request to Caltrans for the balance of grant funding in the coming weeks.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Nicolas Bumb, Associate Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-142
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A - Area Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-142

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND

AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Public Works Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

I80 E
I80 W
HW
Y
65S
HWY 65 N

CIRBY W
Y

JUNCTION BL

BASELINE RD

FIDDYMENT RD

WASHINGTON BL

ROSEVILLEPW

VERNON ST
PLE
ASANT
GR
OVE
BL

SUNRISE AV

ATKINSON ST

DOUGLAS BL

TAYLORRD
LEAD
HILL

BLROCKYRIDGE
DR

INDUSTRIAL AV
DEL
W
EBBBL

RIVERSIDE AV

UPLAND DR

E ROSEVILLE
PW
N
CIRBY
W
Y

HARDINGBL

NSUNRISE
AV
M

CANALLY
DR
C

HURCHST

SIERRACOLLEGEBL

S UN CITY
BL

OAK RIDGE DR

S CIRBY WYSECRETRAVINE
PW
A

LEXANDRADR

COUNTRYCLUBDR

RE SERVE DR

OLYMPUS
DR

VINEYARD RD
FAIRW
AY
DR
M
CLAREN
D
R

ATLANTIC ST

ORLANDO
AV

MELODYLN
GIBSO
N
DR

EUREKA RD

FOOTHILLS BL

FOLSOM RD

HALLISSYDR

BLUE OAKS BL
M
AIN ST
HIG
HLAND
PARK
DR
HAYD
EN
PW

ROSEVILLE RD
JO
HNSON

RANCH DR
OLD

AUBURNRD

PAINTED DESERT DR
JUDAH
ST
W

ESTHILLS DR

N GRANT ST

ROSEVILLE PW

ROSEVILLE
PW
OLD
AUBURN
RD
[
0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000
Feet
PW - Engineering
2019 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Project
S:\Arcdata\publicworks\CIP\BPMP Map.mxd Date Saved: 1/31/2018 2:34:42 PM Legend
Project Location

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2664
File #:
0323 & 0705
Title:

School Resource Officers - Memorandum of Understanding Amendment Contact:

Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the Second Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Roseville and the Roseville Joint Union High School District (RJUHSD) regarding School Resource Officers, and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
The Police Department assigns sworn police officers as School Resource Officers (SRO's), formerly known as Youth Services Officers, to high school campuses. SRO's are assigned to the Social Services Unit. SRO's investigate crimes that occur on campus or that involve the student population, educate and develop positive relationships with students and staff, monitor and enforce truancy laws and act as liaison with county agencies that also support and work with student populations including probation, children’s protective services, mental health, social service agencies and the courts. SRO's help school officials maintain a safe and secure learning environment on campuses.

For the 2023-2026 school years, the City and the District have agreed to assign SRO's to the District's five school campuses in Roseville, which are Oakmont High School, Roseville High School, Woodcreek High School, Adelante High School, and West Park High School.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City cost for providing SRO's for the nine-month school year is approximately $142,547 per officer for salary and benefits and $16,938 for vehicle cost, for a total amount of $797,425 for five officers. This cost does not include the cost for uniforms or equipment. Cost to the City may increase with additional years, due to increase costs for salaries, benefits, and vehicles.

RJUHSD has agreed to offset the costs as follows:
2023-2024: Five Officers = $553,717
2024-2025: Five Officers = $570,326
2025-2026: Five Officers = $570,325
The net cost to the City is approximately $243,708 for school year 2023-2024, and $227,100 for school years 2024-2025 & 2025-2026. Funding for the SRO's has been included in the Police Department's General Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. An amendment to an MOU for SRO's meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Peinado, Management Analyst
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-145
RPD-RJUHD MOU Amendment #2
RESOLUTION NO. 23-145

APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION HIGH

SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, the Second Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Roseville and the Roseville Joint Union High School District regarding School Resource Officers, has been reviewed by the City Council;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Second Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCIL MEMBER:

NOES COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER:

Mayor

ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2684
File #:
0800-04
Title:

Purchase of Motor Vehicles Ordinance
Contact:

Brandy LeBeau 916-774-5531 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.17.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce for first reading an uncodified ordinance for Fleet Services purchases, granting the Purchasing Officer authority to purchase motor vehicles equal to or greater than the bid amount established in the City Charter for a period of two years.

BACKGROUND
The Fleet Services Division of the Public Works Department is responsible for procuring motor vehicles and equipment for the City of Roseville. The current bid amount established in the Municipal Code and City Council approval process timeline limits the ability to secure and procure vehicles in the current environment. With the inflated cost of vehicles, almost all replacements are over the $75,000 threshold and need approval by the City Council. In the time (typically four weeks) it takes for staff to get on the agenda and receive council approval, manufacturer order windows are often missed, or the dealer vehicles are no longer available. This has caused an extremely competitive environment and the loss of purchasing much-needed City vehicles.

In recent months, supply chain issues have caused fleet motor vehicle manufacturers to reduce production quantities, short-release order notifications, and limited time order windows. In addition, manufacturers are adjusting accepted production orders only to produce quantities based on average orders from the past five years. These practices have resulted in the manufacturer canceling orders, rolling the orders into the next calendar year to wait and determine if the order will be fulfilled. The Fleet Division currently has 31 trucks awaiting production for the past three calendar years, and an additional 43 replacements have been requested for FY2023-24. All of these trucks meet the City's replacement requirements of either high mileage or age, and being unable to replace them on time causes the City to incur more maintenance and repair costs to keep the vehicles in good condition until replacements are available.

For Fleet Services to keep up with the demand and provide staff with the best service and safety, the request is to grant the Purchasing Officer authority to purchase vehicles equal to or greater than the bid amount established in the City Charter. This would assist in procuring vehicles that become available at dealers or placing orders as soon as the manufacturer order windows open.

Fleet Services would continue to follow the competitive bidding process and award to the lowest responsible bidder, allowing staff to secure the vehicle once the lowest bidder is established. All purchases will be within the approved Fleet Replacement Fund budget. The ordinance would terminate by its own terms after two years from the approved date.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund. Funding for all purchases is included in the approved fiscal year budgets, and no additional funds are requested for this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of authority to purchase vehicles and trucks meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world.

Goal E – Deliver exceptional city services.

Goal F – Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.

Respectfully Submitted,
Brandy LeBeau, Fleet Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Fleet Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

GRANTING THE PURCHASING OFFICER AUTHORITY TO MAKE PURCHASES OF

MOTOR VEHICLES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE BID AMOUNT ESTABLISHED

IN THE CITY CHARTER FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE EFFECTIVE JUNE 16, 2023

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The Fleet Services Division of the Public Works Department is responsible for procurement of motor vehicles for the City of Roseville. In recent months, supply chain issues have pla gued motor vehicle manufacturers, resulting in an insufficient quanti ty of new motor vehicles being produced to meet demand. This has resulted in an extremely competitive environment in motor vehicle procurement. Dealers are releasing new motor vehicles for purchase in increasingly short windows of time.

SECTION 2. The Fleet Services Division frequently encounters situations where it is not able to procure needed motor vehicles solely due to the length of time that is required to have a purchase order for such motor vehicles approved by the City Council, as required by the City’s procurement laws and policies. This impairs the City’s ability to procure new motor vehicles and results in t he City’s existing fleet vehicles being utilized fo r longer than planned, leading t o increased costs for maintenance and repair.

SECTION 3. Section 7.21 of the Charter of the City of Roseville provides that competitive prices or bids for all purchases and public works and improvements shall be obtained where practicable and the purchase made from, or the contract awarded to, the lowest responsible bidder.

Section 7.21 further provides that s ealed bids shall be asked for in all trans actions involving the expenditure of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) or more.

SECTION 4. Section 4.12.090(A) of the Roseville Municipal Code provides that purchases of supplies or equipment of an estimated value equal to or greater than the bid amount established in the City Charter, shall be by written purchase order with the lowest responsible bidder. Section

4.12.090(D) provides that fol lowing an opening of bids for the purchase of such supplies or equipment, City staff shall submit a recomm endation to the City Counc il for award. Section

4.12.090(F) provides that bids shall be awarded by the City Council, and a purchase order issued by the Purchasing Officer, to the lowest responsible bidder.

SECTION 5. The City Council desires to temporarily exempt, for a period of two (2) years, the purchase of motor vehicles in an amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) or more from the requirement that such purchase orders be approved by the City Council. This temporary exemption for motor vehicle purchases only applies to purchases that are 1) competitively bid pursuant to the City’s existing laws and policies and; 2) within the budget previously approved by the City Council.

SECTION 6. Accordingly, notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 4.12 of the Roseville Municipal Code to the contrary, purchases of motor vehicles in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) or more may be awarded by the Purchasing Officer to the lowest

2 responsible bidder without further City Council approval. This authority is expressly conditioned upon such purchases being within the previously allocated and approved budget of the Fleet Services Division of the Public Works Department. This Ordinance shall terminate on June 16, 2025.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of ____________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

______________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2677
File #:
0324 & 0201-01
Title:

Emergency Medical Services Program - Capital Asset Donation and Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Michael Bradley 916-774-5806 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.18.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
The
Fire Department recommends that the City Council accept a donation of $13,837 in capital assets from the Sierra Sacramento Valley Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency and adopt an ordinance to approve a $36,837 budget adjustment for the purchase and contribution of essential emergency medical equipment.

BACKGROUND
The Sierra Sacramento Valley EMS Agency (SS-V) has an EMS Fund that provides essential equipment to local EMS agencies. In 2023, the Roseville Fire Department was provided $23,000 to purchase video laryngoscopes and given a chest compression system with an extended service agreement providing for a $13,837 capital asset contribution.

The video laryngoscopes will improve the speed and accuracy of securing a compromised airway in the emergency medical setting, improving patient care and outcomes. These are innovative tools which take advantage of hospital technology and integrating it into emergency field medicine.

In addition, SS-V is providing a chest compression system to add to existing equipment which will allow the department to have one unit on every front-line engine.

FISCAL IMPACT
The capital asset donation, the associated extended maintenance agreement and the video laryngoscopes are provided through S-SV without a negative impact to the General Fund. It will provide for a $13,837 capital asset contribution and the $23,000 for video laryngoscopes will be fully reimbursed.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Capital Asset Donation and Budget Adjustment meets the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Michael Bradley, Fire Battalion Chief
Rick Bartee, Fire Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Quote Roseville FD VD
Video Laryngoscopy Grant Request
Ordinance 6645
Budget Adjustment

UE Medical Devices, Inc.
831 Beacon Street, Suite 136
Newton, MA 02459
Tel: (617) 610-2718 Fax: (617) 910-2506
Web: www.uescope.com Email: [email protected]
QUOTE

Quote # Date Valid Until
465 10/27/2022 07:48pm 12/30/2022

Prepare For Prepared By Payment Terms
City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Attn:

David Wei Net 30

Part # Product Unit Price Qty Total
460-1200 UESCOPE VL460 Monitor Kit $1,650.00 10 $16,500.00 010-3001 Single-Use Blade D0 $35.00 20 $700.00
010-3010 Single-Use Blade D1 $35.00 20 $700.00
010-3020 Single-Use Blade D2 $35.00 20 $700.00
010-3030 Single-Use Blade D3 $35.00 50 $1,750.00
010-3040 Single-Use Blade D4 $35.00 50 $1,750.00

Subtotal $22,100.00
Shipping $80.00
Tax $0.00
Total $22,180.00
Video Laryngoscopy UE VL460

Intent
Roseville Fire Department respectfully submits a request for funds to purchase 10 video laryngoscopes. In the setting of the critically ill patient securing endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy, multiple attempts are often required with a higher complication rate due to the emergent, uncontrolled setting, comorbidities, and variability in expertise of operators. We hypothesized that video laryngoscopy would be superior to direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation.

Need
The Roseville Fire Department provides Advanced Life Support response to the City of Roseville and extends that level of care to mutual and automatic aid requests throughout the County and the State under the master mutual aid system.

Roseville currently operates direct laryngoscopy devices on each emergency response unit. Currently the Roseville Fire Department is operating 2 video laryngoscopy devices in a field trial. We are requesting 10 VL devices so that each of our engines can deliver the same level of care and are equipped appropriately.

With a direct laryngoscope, it is necessary to obtain a line of sight from the maxillary teeth to the glottis, by placing the patient's head on a pillow and extending the head on the neck (sniffing position) to displace the tongue and epiglottis, which frequently obstruct the line of sight. In addition, an assistant is frequently required to apply pressure to the thyroid cartilage to obtain a clear view of the glottis, and it is often difficult for the assistant to adjust the direction and the degree of the pressure. With a video laryngoscope, because the image of the glottis is captured near the tip of the blade, only a few centimeters of line of sight will be required. In addition, an assistant can adjust the direction and degree of pressure on the neck by confirming the improvement of the view of the glottis on a video screen. Therefore, theoretically, a video laryngoscope would provide a better view of the glottis increasing the success rate of tracheal intubation.

Aziz et al. performed a randomized, controlled study assessing the efficacy of a video laryngoscope (C-MAC video laryngoscope) in 300 patients with predicted difficult tracheal intubation and have found that the success rate of tracheal intubation at the first attempt with the video laryngoscope was significantly higher (93%) than with a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (84%). The view of the glottis at laryngoscopy was significantly better, and the use of an endotracheal tube introducer (a gum elastic bougie) and pressure to the larynx (to obtain a better view of the glottis) was less frequently required for the video laryngoscope.

Description Cost Quantity Total
460-1200 UESCOPE VL460 Monitor Kit $1,650.00 10 $16,500.00 010-3001 Single-Use Blade D0 $35.00 20 $700.00
010-3010 Single-Use Blade D1 $35.00 20 $700.00 010-3020 Single-Use Blade D2 $35.00 20 $700.00
010-3030 Single-Use Blade D3 $35.00 50 $1,750.00
010-3040 Single-Use Blade D4 $35.00 50 $1,750.00
Subtotal $22,100.00
Shipping $80.00
Tax $0.00
Total $22,180.00

References
Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM: Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.

ANESTHESIOLOGY 2012; 116:629–36

ORDINANCE NO. 6645

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for essential emergency medical equipment.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Katrina Rostam, Management Analyst II FISCAL YEAR: 2022-2023 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Katrina Rostam, Management Analyst II COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 4/19/23 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Fire Department - Emergency Medical Patient Care ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
1001 5375 48070 23,000
1001 6550 48070 15,837
38,837

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
1001 4780 48070 23,000
1001 4640 48070 15,837
38,837
-

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
Capital Outlay - one medical device to be capitalized
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Medical Equipment - Video Laryngoscope

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

The Fire Department was approved to spend $23,000 for video larangyscopes and a donated chest compression system with maintenance agreement for the Emergency Medical Services program through the EMS fund managed by the Sierra-Sacramento (S-SV) EMS, a Placer County government agency responsible for regulating EMS services in the county. The department is requesting $38,837 budget increase to purchase the equipment through the S-SV program and recognize the donated capital equipment.

DESCRIPTION
Donated chest compression system-recognize
contribution
TOTAL
Reimbursement for medical equipment

ACCOUNT STRING
3/27/20238:51 AM
1 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2673
File #:
0324 & 0201-01
Title:

Fire Department Strike Team - Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Jason Rizzi 916-774-5802 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.19.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment to recognize $436,994 in additional overtime expense, $3,108 in other reimbursable items/logistics, a $187,694 contribution to available General Fund resources for fleet usage and overhead, and an associated $627,796 in revenue related to the department participation in reimbursable strike teams.

BACKGROUND
As a participant in the California Fire Assistance Agreement (CFAA) and California Task Force Seven of the National Urban Search and Rescue Response System, the Roseville Fire Department sends resources, upon emergency request, to assist in the management and control of large emergency incidents that occur throughout our region every year. The CFAA can also provide resources to Roseville Fire should the department require and request them. This fiscal year to date, Fire Department crews have assisted throughout California (15 assignments) and participated on two urban search and rescue deployments to the eastern United States. The contracts provide reimbursement for staff, vehicle use and overhead.

FISCAL IMPACT
After the incremental overtime and other expenses are reimbursed, there is a positive impact on the General Fund of $187,694 from the reimbursement for fleet usage and overhead.

CEQA

Statute

§21065

and

CEQA

State

Guidelines
§15060(c)(3)

and
§15378.

The Fire Department strike team budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to
CEQA. No additional environmental review is req
uired.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world.

Respectfully Submitted,
Jason Rizzi, Assistant Fire Chief
Rick Bartee, Fire Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6644
Budget Adjustment - Strike Team
ORDINANCE NO. 6644

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for Roseville Fire Department Strike Team.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Katrina Rostam, Management Analyst II FISCAL YEAR: 2022-23 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Katrina Rostam, Management Analyst II COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 4/19/23 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Fire Department/Fire Administration ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
1001 5010 48001 000000 79,049
1001 5010 48030 000000 341,803
1001 5010 48040 000000 16,142
1001 5461 48030 000000 3,108
440,102

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
1001 4790 48030 000000 627,796
627,796
(187,694)

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
1001 187,694
187,694
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
TOTAL
Strike Team Reimbursed Revenue

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

During FY2022-23, the Fire Department has been deployed on two urban search and rescue deployments, 14 fire assignments, and one storm assignment statewide through the California Fire Assistance Agreement and other state/federal aid contracts. The $627,796 budget adjustment is being requested for $436,994 in reimbursable overtime labor costs, $3,108 in additional materials, services, and supplies costs incurred, and other reimbursable items not requiring a budget increase in the amount of $187,694. This budget request will be funded through reimbursements from our Federal, State, and local partners and will increase the General Fund available resources by $187,694.

Strike Team Reimbursable Overtime
Strike Team - Other Reimbursed Expenses
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Strike Team Reimbursable Overtime
Increase General Fund Balance
Strike Team Reimbursable Overtime

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
3/27/20238:18 AM
1 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2678
File #:
0214 & 0800-02 & 0201-01
Title:

Electric Charging Station Project - Grant
Awards, Grant Agreement and Budget
Adjustment
Contact:

Brandy LeBeau 916-774-5531 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.20.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council adopt:

A resolution accepting grant awards from Roseville Electric and Placer County Air Pollution Control District for the Electric Charging Station project, approving a Grant Agreement with Placer County Air Pollution Control District, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it and any related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville; and An ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of $107,102.

BACKGROUND
Clean Air Grant Program – Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Attainment Program The Placer County Air Pollution Control District’s Clean Air Grant Program provides monetary grants to public agencies to fund projects that enable the deployment of alternative, advanced, and cleaner technologies to support the State’s air quality goals. Providing funding to support California’s transformation toward zero and near-zero technologies, including installation of fueling or energy infrastructure to fuel or power-covered sources.

Roseville Electric Utility
Roseville Electric Utility’s “Charge ahead Roseville” commercial electric vehicle program provides rebates to install commercial electric vehicle charging stations. Roseville Electric received funding from the state to incentivize commercial businesses by offering $4,500 incentives for each Level 2 hardwired wall or pedestal-mounted electric vehicle charger port.

In May of 2022, the Fleet Services Division submitted a grant application to Placer County Air Pollution District’s Clean Air Grant program Alternative Fueling Infrastructure. As a result, the Placer County Air Pollution Control District awarded Fleet Services a total of $31,360 toward the City’s electric vehicle charging station in the downtown parking garage. In addition, the Fleet Services Division applied to the Roseville Electric rebate program for electric vehicle charging stations. As a result, Roseville Electric awarded $63,000 to purchase level 2 electric vehicle charger ports. With the combined funding from Placer County and Roseville Electric, seven (7) dual-head electric charging ports will be installed in the downtown parking garage to support the City’s electric fleet vehicles located downtown.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Placer County Air Control Pollution District grant, Roseville Electric rebate award, and Fleet Services will fund the total for the City’s fleet electric charging station infrastructure project amount of $107,102. Funding under this grant will be awarded upon approved post-inspection by Placer County Air Pollution Control District or contract end date of April 30, 2027. There is no General Fund impact.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world.

Goal E – Deliver exceptional city services.

Goal F – Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.

Respectfully Submitted,
Brandy LeBeau, Fleet Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-153
PCAPCD Grant Agreement
Ordinance 6646
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 23-153

ACCEPTING GRANT AWARDS FROM ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC AND PLACER COUNTY

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT, APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE PLACER COUNTY AIR POLLUTION

CONTROL DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, Roseville Electric received funding from the state to incentivize commercial businesses by offering $4,500 incentives for each Level 2 hardwired wall or pedestal-mounted electric vehicle charger port; and

WHEREAS, the Fleet Services Division applied for and was awarded $63,000 to purchase level 2 electric vehicle charger ports.

WHEREAS, the Placer County Air Pollution Control District’s Clean Air Grant Program provides monetary grants to public agencies to fund projects that enable the deployment of alternative, advanced, and cleaner technologies to support the State’s air quality goals; and

WHEREAS, the Fleet Services Division submitted a grant application to Placer County Air Pollution Control District in order to receive funding towards the City’s electric vehicle charging station project in the downtown parking garage; and

WHEREAS, the City was awarded $31,360 from the Placer County Air Pollution District’s Clean Air Grant Program for the electric vehicle charging station; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the City of Roseville accepts the grant award from Roseville Electric; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Roseville accepts the grant award from Placer County Air Pollution Control District and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Grant Agreement on behalf of the City of Roseville; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as the grant recipient, the City of Roseville agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements related to the awards.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

Contract # SCN105336R Page 1

GRANT AGREEMENT

PCAPCD Contract Year: FY 22-23

Contract Number: SCN105336R

Board Resolution: 18-07

Grant Description: Electric Vehicle Charging Station - Oak Street

This AGREEMENT is between the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (hereinafter “PCAPCD”) and City of Roseville (Public Works - Fleet Services), (hereinafter “GRANTEE”).

The parties agree as follows:

1. Services

a) GRANTEE agrees, during the term of this AGREEMENT, to perform the contracting services set forth below and in Exhibit A – Scope of Services (hereinafter “PROJECT”).

b) GRANTEE shall be obligated to devote as much time, attention, skill, and effort as may be reasonably required to perform the PROJECT services, in a professional and timely manner, consistent with the elements of the PROJECT.

2. Contract Period

a) The term of this contract shall begin on the last date signed by the parties below and conclude on or before the end dates listed in Exhibit B – Contract Term and Payment for Services Rendered, unless terminated or amended.

b) This contract may be canceled by either party upon serving thirty (30) days’ notice in writing to the other party.

3. Payment

a) PCAPCD agrees to pay for the services covered by this AGREEMENT pursuant to the payment terms set forth below and in Exhibit B – Contract Term and Payment for Services Rendered.

b) The amount paid to the GRANTEE shall constitute full payment for all services set forth herein. GRANTEE shall not be reimbursed for any additional expenses incurred beyond the maximum approved sum.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 2
c) GRANTEE shall bill PCAPCD upon completion of the PROJECT and after all of the conditions for funding outlined in this AGREEMENT are met. If the PROJECT funded under this AGREEMENT is performed in phases or over a period of time, the n requests can be made by the GRANTEE for partial payment. Partial requests for payments must receive prior authorization by PCAPCD. GRANTEE agrees to provide a detailed invoice to PCAPCD with copies of purchase orders, signed contracts, or receipts refere ncing the contract number. PCAPCD retains the right to require proof of services performed or costs incurred prior to any payment under this AGREEMENT.

d) Notwithstanding any other terms of this AGREEMENT, no payments shall be made to GRANTEE until PCAPCD is satisfied that work of such value has been rendered pursuant to this AGREEMENT.

4. Notices

a) Any notice or demand desired or required to be given hereunder shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered, sent via email with confirmed receipt, or deposited in the mail, postage prepaid, sent certified or registered and addressed to the parties as follows:

PCAPCD:

Placer County Air Pollution Control District
Attn: Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO)
110 Maple Street
Auburn, CA 95603
Email: [email protected]

GRANTEE:

City of Roseville (Public Works - Fleet Services)
Attn: Dominick Casey
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Email: [email protected]

b) Any notice so delivered personally shall be deemed to be received on the date of delivery, any notice so delivered via email with confirmed receipt shall be deemed to be received on the date of receipt confirmation, and any notice mailed shall be deemed to be received five (5) days after the date on which it was mailed.

5. Obligations of PCAPCD

a) PCAPCD agrees to pay GRANTEE an amount not to exceed the requirements set forth in Exhibit B – Contract Term and Payment for Services Rendered, in accordance with the requirements listed in Exhibit A – Scope of Services.

b) PCAPCD shall not reimburse GRANTEE for any expenses incurred by GRANTEE in the performance of PROJECT described in Exhibit A unless such reimbursement is specifically authorized in the Payment Schedule. GRANTEE shall not be reimbursed for any additional expenses incurred beyond the maximum amount.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 3

c) Except for the payment obligations set forth above, PCAPCD shall have no other obligations or responsibilities to GRANTEE under this AGREEMENT.

6. Obligations of GRANTEE

a) GRANTEE has or will obtain all additional funding set forth in Exhibit B of this AGREEMENT.

b) GRANTEE has or will obtain all required licenses, permits, fees, and other legal authorizations from all applicable Federal, State, and local jurisdictions necessary to commence and properly complete, in a professional manner, the PROJECT described in Exhibit A and will produce said documents if requested by PCAPCD.

c) Labor, equipment, material, supply costs and other charges will be in conformance with the requirements of Exhibit A.

d) No component of the monies to be paid by PCAPCD to GRANTEE shall be used for grant administration or any interest costs.

e) GRANTEE shall provide proof of PROJECT completion and verification of costs as set forth in Exhibit A and Section 3 above.

7. Hold Harmless/Indemnity

a) The GRANTEE hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold PCAPCD free and harmless from any and all losses, claims, liens, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character including, but not limited to, the amounts of judgments, penalties, interest, court costs, legal fees, and all other expenses incurred by PCAPCD arising in favor of any party, including claims, liens, debts, personal injuries, death, or damages to property (including employees or property of PCAPCD) and without limitation by enumeration, all other claims or demands of every character occurring or in any way incident to, in connection with or arising directly or indirectly out of, the contract or agreement.

GRANTEE agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, provide defense for, and defend any such claims, demand, or suit at the sole expense of the GRANTEE. GRANTEE also agrees to bear all other costs and expenses related thereto, even if the claim or claims alleged are groundless, false, or fraudulent. This provision is not intended to create any cause of action in favor of any third party against GRANTEE or PCAPCD or to enlarge in any way the GRANTEE's liability but is intended solely to provide for indemnification of PCAPCD from liability for damages or injuries to third persons or property arising from GRANTEE's performance pursuant to this contract or agreement.

b) As used above, the term PCAPCD means PCAPCD or its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers.

8. Insurance Requirements

a) It is recognized that GRANTEE is self-insured, and as such provides coverage for General Liability and Worker’s Compensation.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 4

b) GRANTEE shall file with PCAPCD, concurrently herewith, Certificates of Insurance. All certificates are to be received and approved by PCAPCD b efore work commences.

However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the GRANTEE’s obligation to provide them. PCAPCD reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies , required by these specifications, at any time.

c) GRANTEE shall maintain the following insurance coverage in full force and effect during the term of this contract:

WORKER’S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE

If GRANTEE represents that they have no employees, and does not hire SUBCONTRACTORS with employees, then they are not required to have Workers Compensation coverage.

Worker's Compensation Insurance shall be provided as required by any applicable law or regulation. Employer's liability insurance shall be provided in amounts not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) each accident for bodily injury by accident, one million dollars ($1,000,000) policy limit for bodily injury by disease, and one million dollars ($1,000,000) each employee for bodily injury by disease.

If there is an exposure of injury to GRANTEE’S employees under the U.S.

Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act, the Jones Act, or under laws, regulations, or statutes applicable to maritime employees, coverage shall be included for such injuries or claims.

GRANTEE shall require all SUBCONTRACTORS to maintain adequate Workers’ Compensation insurance. Certificates of Workers’ Compensation shall be filed with PCAPCD upon demand.

GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE

A. Comprehensive General Liability or Commercial General Liability insurance covering all operations by or on behalf of GRANTEE, providing insurance for bodily injury liability and property damage liability for the limits of liability indicated below and including coverage for:

→ Contractual liability insuring the obligations assumed by GRANTEE in this Agreement.

B. One of the following forms is required:

1. Comprehensive General Liability;

2. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence); or

3. Commercial General Liability (Claims Made).

Contract # SCN105336R Page 5
C. If GRANTEE carries a Comprehensive General Liability policy, the limits of liability shall not be less than a Combined Single Limit for bodily injury damage, and Personal Injury Liability of:

→ One million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence
→ One million dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate

D. If GRANTEE carries a Commercial General Liability (Occurrence) policy:

1. The limits of liability shall not be less than:
→ One million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence (combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage)
→ One million dollars ($1,000,000) for Products-Completed Operation → One million dollars ($1,000,000) General Aggregate

2. If the policy does not have an endorsement providing that the General Aggregate Limit applies separately, or if defense costs are included in the aggregate limits, then the required aggregate limit is two million dollars ($2,000,000).

E. Special Claims Made Policy Form Provisions:

1. The limits of liability shall not be less than:
→ One million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence (combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage)
→ One million dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate for Products Completed Operations → One million dollars ($1,000,000) General Aggregate

2. The insurance coverage provided by GRANTEE shall contain contract in order to provide insurance coverage for the hold harmless provisions herein if the policy is a claims-made policy.

9. Facilities, Equipment and Other Materials

Except as set forth herein, GRANTEE shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities, equipment, and other materials which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this AGREEMENT. PCAPCD shall furnish GRANTEE only those facilities, equipment, and other materials, and shall perform only those obligations as listed herein.

10. Non-Discrimination

GRANTEE shall not discriminate in its employment practices because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual preference, or in contravention of any other protected classification or practice identified in the California Fair Employment and Housing Act; Government Code section 12900 et seq.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 6

11. Records and Documents

a) GRANTEE shall maintain at all times complete, detailed records with regard to work performed under this AGREEMENT, in a form acceptable to PCAPCD, and PCAPCD shall have the right to inspect such records at any reasonable time.

b) GRANTEE agrees to return to PCAPCD, upon termination of this AGR EEMENT, all documents, drawings, photographs, and other written or graphic material, however produced, received from PCAPCD and used by GRANTEE in the performance of its services. All work papers, drawings, internal memoranda, graphics, photographs, and any written or graphic material, however produced, prepared by GRANTEE in connection with its performance of services hereunder shall be, and shall remain after termination of this AGREEMENT, the property of PCAPCD and may be used by PCAPCD for any purpose whatsoever. PCAPCD agrees that any future use of documents produced by the GRANTEE under the terms of this contract shall be at the sole discretion of PCAPCD and GRANTEE shall bear no liability for the decisions on whether and how to use such documents.

12. Independent Status

a) GRANTEE shall perform this contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of PCAPCD. GRANTEE acknowledges that GRANTEE is not entitled to any of PCAPCD’s fringe benefits, including without limitation; paid holidays, life insurance, sick leave, or travel or any other expenses in connection with services performed hereunder. No part of the compensation payable to GRANTEE hereunder shall be deducted or withheld for payment of Federal or State income or other employment related t axes. It shall be the responsibility of GRANTEE to provide all coverage necessary for GRANTEE’s own benefit and not as an employee of PCAPCD.

b) Except as PCAPCD may specify in writing, GRANTEE shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of PCAPCD in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.

GRANTEE shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this AGREEMENT to bind PCAPCD to any obligation whatsoever.

13. Warranties

GRANTEE warrants that its services are performed, with the usual thor oughness and competence; in accordance with the standard for professional services at the time those services are rendered.

14. Licenses, Permits, Etc

GRANTEE represents and warrants to PCAPCD that it has or will obtain before initiation of the PROJECT, all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature, which are legally required for GRANTEE to practice its profession. GRANTEE represents and warrants to PCAPCD that GRANTEE shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this AGREEMENT, any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for GRANTEE to practice its profession at the time the services are performed.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 7

15. Assignment or Transfer

GRANTEE may assign any of its rights, burdens, duties, or obligations under this AGREEMENT only upon the prior written consent of PCAPCD. Approval will be at the sole discretion of PCAPCD.

16. Modification of Agreement

This AGREEMENT cannot be changed or supplemented orally, and may be modified or superseded only by written instrument executed by all parties.

17. Waiver

One or more waivers by one party of any major or minor breach or default of any provision, term, condition, or covenant of this AGREEMENT shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach or default.

18. Entirety of AGREEMENT

This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire AGREEMENT and understanding between the parties. There are no oral understandings, ter ms, or conditions, and no party has relied upon any representation, express or implied, not contained in this AGREEMENT. Any prior understandings, terms, or conditions are deemed merged into this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT is intended as the complete and exclusive statement of the parties’ Agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1856.

19. Jurisdiction

This AGREEMENT, and the right and obligations of the parties, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Califo rnia. If any action is instituted to enforce or interpret this AGREEMENT, venue shall only be in the appropriate state or federal court having venue over matters arising in Placer County, California, provided that nothing in this AGREEMENT shall constitute a waiver of immunity to suit by PCAPCD.

20. Exhibits

All exhibits referred to herein and attached hereto are fully incorporated by this reference.

21. Electronic Signatures

An Electronic Signature refers to any representation in electronic form used to express intent, including a typed name placed in a signatory area, a digitized image or copy of a handwritten signature, a scanned signature on a PDF document, a biometric mark, a sound, or a digital signature. An Electronic Signature provides who signed, what was signed, captures intent and consent. If parties agree to a transaction by electronic means and are required by law to provide, send, or deliver information in writing, the requirement is satisfied if the information is

Contract # SCN105336R Page 8
provided, sent, or delivered in an electronic record, which the recipient can retain at the time of receipt.

By the action of applying an Electronic Signature to this AGREEMENT, parties to the AGREEMENT are certifying their willingness to use electronic signatures and records delivered via electronic means. A signed copy of this AGREEMENT, or any other related ancillary agreement or amendment, transmitted by facsimile, email, electronic signature application, or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signature.

The parties so agree.

City of Roseville (Public Works - Fleet Services):

Date:

Dominick Casey
City Manager

Placer County Air Pollution Control District:

Date:

Erik C. White
Air Pollution Control Officer

Contract # SCN105336R Page 9

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Grant Description: Electric Vehicle Charging Station - Oak Street

Project Contact Information (subject to change):

GRANTEE:

Brandy LeBeau
(916) 774-5531
[email protected]

PCAPCD:

Molly Johnson
(530) 745-2326
[email protected]
Project Scope:

Purchase and have installed a private electrical vehicle charging station located at 405 Oak Street, Roseville, CA 95661. The charging station shall include seven, dual-port, Level 2 or higher electric vehicle chargers and associated equipment and infrastructure as out lined in GRANTEE's Clean Air Grant application and associated quotes. The station shall be able to charge fourteen vehicles at a time.

Usage:

Usage of the electric vehicle charging station is anticipated to consist of 100 monthly charging events, for an es timated minimum total of 1200 visits per year. GRANTEE shall make every possible effort to meet this usage goal, for the first three years of operation.

I. To be Completed Prior to Funding and Prior to Project Completion End Date Prior to funding and prior to the close of the Project Completion End Date, as outlined in Exhibit B, the GRANTEE shall meet the following conditions:

A. Purchase and install electric vehicle charging station as described above, and as outlined in GRANTEE's Carl Moyer grant application and associated quotes. If, after execution of this AGREEMENT, GRANTEE wishes to amend/modify project scope, from what was herein described, GRANTEE shall submit a request to PCAPCD as soon as possible to seek approval to do so. Changes to project scope and description may only occur with PCAPCD written permission. Additional project costs from such changes, or costs not eligible for funding shall be borne by the GRANTEE.

B. Battery charging station installations which are a vailable to the public must be reported to the Department of Energy Alternative Fuel Data Center located at:
http://www.afdc.energy.gov/locator/stations/.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 10
C. GRANTEE (or its representative) shall provide to PCAPCD:
1) Copies of invoices relative to the purchase of equipment and services funded under this AGREEMENT.
2) Proof and terms of financing, including lender and amount financed (if applicable). 3) Warranty and its terms for installed equipment.
4) Original invoice to PCAPCD, for the amount of requested grant funds for reimbursement. Note that the invoice cannot be paid until all of the requirements for funding have been completed. PCAPCD may requir e GRANTEE to re -submit the invoice if payment requirements have not been met in the current PCAPCD fiscal year (7/1 through 6/30).
5) GRANTEE shall provide documentation identifying that they have obtained all applicable land use permits from agencies needed to install and operate the stations. 6) Certification from the GRANTEE that all funding sources that they have applied for or received for the PROJECT have been disclosed, and that the GRANTEE will notify PCAPCD of additional sources of funding received for the total cost of the PROJECT, including any sources that become available after contract execution, prior to PROJECT funding. GRANTEE is prohibited from receiving grants and other funds that exceed the total project amount.
7) An AB 841 Certification Statement that certifies the project complied with all AB 841 (2020) requirements or describes why the AB 841 requirements do not apply to the project. The certification shall be signed by the GRANTEE’s authorized representative. If AB 841 requirements apply, the Certification Statement will include the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program (EVITP) Certification Number of each EVITP certified electrician that installed electric vehicle charging infrastructure or equipment.

D. Visibly display at each charging station that funding was made available by PCAPCD.

Any graphics used for this purpose need to be approved in advance by PCAPCD staff.

E. Have a post inspection conducted by PCAPCD staff in order to verify PROJECT completion and operation as outlined in this AGREEMENT and the GRANTEE’s grant application.

F. A determination by PCAPCD that the PROJECT and all associated documentation have satisfied the requirements for reimbursement.

G. Charger must be certified by a Nationally Recognized Testi ng Laboratory (e.g., Underwriter’s Laboratories, Intertek) located at:
https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/nrtllist.html
II. To Be Completed During Project Implementation Period During the PROJECT Implementation Period, the GRANTEE shall complete the following reporting and recordkeeping requirements. The PROJECT Implementation Period ref ers to the timeframe between the PCAPCD Approved Post -Inspection date and the Contract End Date:

A. GRANTEE shall keep records in order to satisfy the requirements of the Annual Monitoring Report, as outlined in Exhibit C of this AGREEMENT. Such records shal l

Contract # SCN105336R Page 11
include quantity of fuel/electricity used at each station, number and type of users, and any downtime encountered, including duration and cause of downtime.

B. GRANTEE shall provide PCAPCD Annual Monitoring Reports as described in Exhibit C. The first annua l monitoring report shall be submitted no later than 13 months after PROJECT post-inspection and continuing annually thereafter throughout the PROJECT Implementation Time Frame of this AGREEMENT. At a minimum, noncompliance with the reporting requirements will require an on-site inspection(s). At the sole discretion of PCAPCD, ten (10) percent of the awarded grant amount, as outlined in Exhibit B, will be withheld pending the submittal and approval of the first Annual Monitoring Report as outlined in Exhibit C – Monitoring Report Format.

C. GRANTEE shall maintain and retain usage and other records associated with the PROJECT for at least three years after the end of the contract term.

D. Pursuant to Section 8 of this AGREEMENT, GRANTEE shall provide proof of insurance prior to performing work on this PROJECT, and throughout the term of this contract.

III. General Conditions
A. Work associated with the installation of the charging/alternative fueling infrastructure must be done by a licensed contractor. GRANTEE agrees to be bound by the provisions of State Labor Code Section 1771 regarding prevailing wages, as applicable. If applicable, GRANTEE shall monitor all agreements subject to reimbursement from this agreement to ensure that the prevailing wage provisions of Sta te Labor Code Section 1771 are being met.

B. AB 841 requires that electric vehicle infrastructure and equipment on the customer side of the electrical meter be installed by contractors with the appropriate license classification as determined by the Contractors State License Board. Specifically, at least one electrician on each crew, at any given time, must hold an EVITP certification; and 1) Projects that install a charging port supplying 25 kilowatts (kW) or more to a vehicle, must have at least 25 percent of the total electricians working on the crew for the project, at any given time, hold an Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program (EVITP) certification; and
2) One member of each crew may be both the contractor and an EVITP certified electrician.
3) The requirements stated in 1) and 2) above do not apply to any of the following:
a. Electric vehicle charging infrastructure installed by employees of an electrical corporation or local publicly owned electric utility.
b. Electric vehicle charging infrastructure funded by moneys derived from credits generated from the Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (Subarticle 7 (commencing with Section 95480) of Article 4 of Subchapter 10 of Chapter 1 of Division 3 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations). c. Single-family home residential electric vehicle chargers that can use an existing 208/240-volt outlet.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 12
4) GRANTEE acknowledges the project will comply with the AB 841 requirements and provide the AB 841 Certification Statement, as specified in Exhibit A, Section I.C.7, with submission of the invoice requesting grants funds for reimbursement.

Initials: {{InitContractor_es_:signer4:initials}}
C. Eligible costs are limited to the purchase and installation of the equipment for power delivery or fueling directly related to the infrastructure project and must utilize commercially available technologies. Refer to the 2017 Carl Moyer Guidelines, Chapter 10, for a complete list of eligible, discretionary and ineligible costs.

D. Publicly accessible stations, at a minimum must be accessible to the public daily, during regular business hours.

E. Equipment and parts must be new.

F. For Battery charging stations, chargers must be Level 2 or higher.

G. Publicly accessible light-duty battery charging stations must use a valid and universally accepted charge connector protocol (e.g. Society of Automotive Engineers, CHAdeMO).

H. Equipment must have at least a one-year warranty.

I. The equipment funded under this AGREEMENT must be in operable condition throughout the term of this AGREEMENT.
1) Publicly accessible infrastructure projects must maintain a 95 percent successful charging rate with 24/7 customer service available on site, via toll free telephone number. If equipment becomes non- functional, the GRANTEE is responsible for ensuring that repairs are made and the station is up and running within 48 hours. The GRANTEE must notify PCAPCD of any downtime beyond the 48 hours and work with PCAPCD to ensure publicly accessible stations become operational. 2) For non-publicly accessible infrastructure projects, if the equipment becomes non- functional, the GRANTEE has 15 business days to report the problem to PCAPCD and begin working with PCAPCD promptly to ensure infrastructure equipment is operational.
3) During the PROJECT Implementation Time Frame, if the fuel/energy meter fails for any reason, the fuel/energy meter must be repaired or replaced as soon as possible and is considered a maintenance expense, therefore not an eligible cost for reimbursement.

J. PROJECTS must comply with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and requirements, including environmental laws and State building, environmental, and fire codes.

K. For charging/alternative fueling infrastructure projects that receive a grant of $50,000 or more, PCAPCD shall submit a Uniform Commercial Code-1 Financing Statement Form to the California Secretary of State. The financing statement shall list PCAPCD as the secured party.

L. GRANTEE shall notify PCAPCD in writing if installation and/or implementation of this PROJECT will deviate from the scope of work as outlined in the GRANTEE’s Grant Application or this AGREEMENT at any time during the term of this AGREEMENT.

GRANTEE shall notify the APCO within 15 days of recognizing such deviation. If

Contract # SCN105336R Page 13
funding has not yet been disbursed at the time of recognizing such deviation, then the GRANTEE shall notify the APCO at least 30 days in advance of any request for payment.

The APCO has the sole discretion to approve, deny, or adjust funding amount as outlined in Exhibit B of this AGREEMENT, based on the extent of the deviation.

M. GRANTEE shall maintain the equipment funded under this AGREEMENT according to the manufacturer’s specifications for the term of the AGREEMENT and shall not tamper with it in any way as to void the warranty.

N. GRANTEE shall allow PCAPCD, CARB, or other designee to conduct an inspection or audit of the PROJECT being funded under this AGREEMENT, including the engine, equipment, and associated records, during the contract term. At the time of execution of this AGREEMENT, GRANTEE’s signature shall be a certification that its fleet, engine(s), and vehicles are in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local air quality rules and regulations and shall continue to maintain, for the ter m of the AGREEMENT, compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local air quality rules and regulations for the full contract term.

O. Throughout the term of this AGREEMENT, the PROJECT cannot be used to generate credits or compliance extensions, and must be excluded when determining regulatory compliance, when applicable.

P. GRANTEES that receive co-funding for the PROJECT funded under this AGREEMENT must meet all criteria associated with each funding source used to fund the PROJECT.

Q. GRANTEES that are n ot a public entity must provide at least 15 percent of the PROJECT’s Moyer eligible costs from non-public sources.

R. In addition to the terms of this AGREEMENT, GRANTEE shall adhere to all requirements outlined in the applicable California Air Resources Boar d Guidelines. If there is a conflict between the terms of this contract and California Air Resources Board’s Guidelines, the California Air Resources Board’s Guidelines shall prevail.

S. By executing this AGREEMENT, GRANTEE understands and agrees to operate a nd maintain their station(s) according to the terms herein and to cooperate with PCAPCD and CARB in implementation, monitoring, enforcement, and other efforts to assure the emission benefits are real, quantifiable, surplus, and enforceable.

T. CARB, as an intended third party beneficiary, reserves the right to enforce the terms of this AGREEMENT at any time during the term of this AGREEMENT to ensure emission reductions are obtained.

IV. Repercussions for Nonperformance
A. If for any reason, after PROJECT funding, the PROJECT does not perform according to what was submitted in the GRANTEE’s application, or in conjunction with the application, or if the conditions of this AGREEMENT are not met, PCAPCD or CARB may require reimbursement of grant funds.

B. CARB and PCAPCD have the authority to pursue any remedies available under the law for noncompliance with Moyer Program requirements and nonperformance of terms outlined in this AGREEMENT, in an effort to ensure emission reductions are obtained.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 14

EXHIBIT B

CONTRACT TERM AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES RENDERED

Grant Description: Electric Vehicle Charging Station - Oak Street

Contract Schedule (to occur on or before the following dates) Start Date: last date signed by the parties
Project Completion End Date: 4/30/2024
Project Implementation Start Date: Upon approved Post-Inspection by PCAPCD Project Implementation Period: 3 years
Contract End Date: 4/30/2027

Budget
Amount Awarded by PCAPCD: $31,360.00
Estimated Co-Funding (including in-kind): $63,000.00
Estimated Total PROJECT Amount: $94,360.00

If the Total PROJECT Amount is less than what is listed above, then the GRANTEE may be required to provide an equivalent percentage of Co-Funding based on the reduced Total PROJECT Amount. The Amount Awarded by PCAPCD, as listed above, shall be adjusted accordingly.

Payment
PCAPCD will provide up to $31,360.00 (Thirty- One Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Dollars) in funding, in accordance with the requirements listed in this AGREEMENT. Payment(s) shall be made to the GRANTEE within thirty (30) days after the billing is received and approved by PCAPCD.

At the sole discretion of PCAPCD, ten (10) percent of the awarded grant amount, as outlined in this exhibit, will be withheld pending the submittal and approval of th e first Annual Monitoring Report as outlined in Exhibit C – Monitoring Report Format.

A completed federal W-9 form and California 590 form must be submitted prior to payment. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued for incentive funds received under this AGREEMENT, if applicable.

It is the GRANTEE’s responsibility to determine tax liability associated with receiving grant incentive funds.

Invoices
Invoices shall be submitted to PCAPCD in an original format and include the contract number. Along with submitting an invoice for reimbursement, provide copies of all paid receipts and proof of in-kind support (when applicable), and evidence of financing, associated with the PROJECT funded under this AGREEMENT.

Contract # SCN105336R Page 15

EXHIBIT C

MONITORING REPORT FORMAT

Grant Description: Electric Vehicle Charging Station - Oak Street

The first annual monitoring report shall be submitted no later than 13 months after PROJECT post- inspection and continuing annually thereafter throughout the PROJECT Implementation Period of this AGREEMENT. The report can be emailed, mailed, or delivered in person to PCAPCD.

The report shall include the following:

1. GRANTEE’s name, address, and telephone number.

2. Reference Contract Number.

3. Qualitative description of public and private uses.

4. Annual and cumulative PROJECT total of usage per charger (e.g. kilowatt -hour) and number of plug in events.

5. If the charging station has incorporated solar or wind power generation equipment, then provide the amount of electricity generated (kilowatt -hour) from the solar or wind power generating equipment.

6. Any unscheduled downtime, including duration of downtime and causes of downtime.

Note: After the monitoring report is submitted to PCAPCD, staff may conduct a performance evaluation on the PROJECT.

ORDINANCE NO. 6646

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the fleet services electric charging station project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2687
File #:
0800-04
Title:

Second Reading - Transportation System Management - Roseville Municipal Code Ordinance Amendment
Contact:

Ed Scofield
916-774-5449
[email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.21.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 6649 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTIONS 11.33.010, 11.33.020, 11.33.030, 11.33.060, 11.33.070, 11.33.080, 11.33.090,

11.33.100, 11.33.110 AND 11.33.120 OF CHAPTER 11.33 OF TITLE 11 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE AND DELETING SECTIONS 11.33.130 AND 11.33.140 OF CHAPTER 11.33 OF TITLE 11 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL

CODE REGARDING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
, for second reading
and adoption.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not applicable.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6649
ORDINANCE NO. 6649

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTIONS

11.33.010, 11.33.020, 11.33.030, 11.33.060, 11.33.070, 11.33.080, 11.33.090, 11.33.100,

11.33.110 AND 11.33.120 OF CHAPTER 11.33 OF TITLE 11 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE AND DELETING SECTIONS 11.33.130 AND 11.33.140 OF CHAPTER

11.33 OF TITLE 11 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 11.33.010 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.010 Findings.

The city council of the City of Roseville finds and determines that:

A. In 2021, the population of Roseville was approximately 146,875. With buildout of the General Plan, the City is estimated to have a total population of approximately 198,000, with approximately 75,200 dwelling units, 60 million square feet of non-residential building square footage, and between 120,000 and 150,000 local jobs. As population increases, coupled with the increases in employment, there is a need to promote travel modes other than single occupant vehicles in order to minimize road congestion and air pollution in the region, and to fulfill the goals, policies and implementation measures in the general plan is needed.

B. Ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes among employees for home to work trips is a simple, inexpensive and effective means of reducing peak hour, single occupant motor vehicle trips and vehicles miles traveled (VMT). A reduction in such trips and VMT can be expected to result in an improvement to the region’s air quality, and a reduction in traffic congestion and energy consumption impacts relating to anticipated growth.

C. Implementation of a transportation systems management program focusing on alternative transportation modes is required to protect the public health, safety and welfare.

D. Cooperation with and coordination of transportation systems management programs with other cities, counties, and communities in the region and through regional agencies will demonstrate the viability and enhance the effectiveness of such programs.

SECTION 2. Section 11.33.020 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.020 Establishment of transportation systems management (TSM) program and purpose.
2 The City of Roseville transportation systems management (TSM) program is established.

The purposes and intent of this TSM program are to:

A. Reduce total vehicle emissions in the City of Roseville to achieve local, regional and statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction goals and improve air quality in the region.

B. Reduce vehicle miles traveled in the City of Roseville by expanding mobility options and encouraging viable non-automotive means of transportation in and through Roseville.

C. Increase the efficiency of the existing transportation network and contribute to achieving acceptable level of service (LOS) C on the roadway system in the City of Roseville.

D. Cooperate and coordinate with other cities, counties, communities and regional agencies in these endeavors.

E. Develop a program that secures the participation of local developers, businesses, institutions and public and private agencies to fulfill the purposes expressed herein.

SECTION 3. Section 11.33.030 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.030 Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the following terms shall be given the meaning ascribed to them in this section.

A. Applicant. An applicant for any development approval, design review permit, tentative subdivision map or parcel map or for a use or uses which, individually or collectively, may be reasonably expected to generate employment for 50 or more employees at a major common work location.

B. Carpool. A motor vehicle occupied by two or more, but less than eight persons traveling to a common destination. Employees who work for different employers as well as non- employed persons, excluding children, are included within the definition so long as they are in the vehicle for the majority of the total trip distance.

C. Clean Air Vehicle. Any combination of a low-emitting, fuel-efficient, and carpool/vanpool vehicle.

D. Commute Trip. The trip made by an employee from home-to-work or work-to- home. The commute trip may include stops between the home and the work site.

E. Common Work Location.
3 1. A common work location shall consist of any office, commercial or industrial project or a single employer in separate or common ownership having more than 10 but fewer than 50 employees, which can generally be characterized by one or more of the following:
a. Known by a common name given to the project by its developer; b. Governed by a common set of covenants, conditions, and restrictions, which requires common area maintenance agreement or owner’s association; c. Approved, or is to be approved, as a single entity by the city; d. Covered by a single parcel map or final subdivision map; or e. Functions as a single retail, business center, or industrial park.

2. A “major common work location” is any common work location as defined in this section with 50 or more employees.

F. Commuter. An employee who travels regularly to and from a common work location or major common work location two or more days a week.

G. Commuter Rideshare Matchlisting Service. The rideshare program and commuter information service operated by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG).

H. EV. Electric Vehicle
I. Existing TSM Plan and TSM Agreement. A TSM plan and TSM agreement existing prior to the adoption of this amendment to this chapter.

J. Flexible Work Hours. A system for shifting the workday of an employee so that the workday starts and/or ends outside of the peak hours.

K. Level of Service (LOS). A scale that measures the operating capacity likely to be encountered on a roadway or at the intersection of roadways, based on a volume-to-capacity ratio, with levels ranging from A to F, with A representing the highest level of service and F the lowest level of service.

L. Peak Hours. The periods of the day with the greatest volume of vehicular street traffic. In Roseville, the peak hours are generally between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00a.m. and 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. from Monday through Friday.

M. Peak Hour Commuter. A commuter who regularly arrives at, or departs from, a common work location or major common work location during the peak hours.

N. Peak Hour Trip. An arrival at, or departure from, a common work location or major common work location during the peak hours by a motor vehicle.

O. Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA). The Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the Placer County jurisdictions, except for that portion of the county within the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA). One of the PCTPA’s 4 responsibilities is maintaining the congestion management program (CMP) which is to coordinate the interrelationship of transportation, land use and air quality including trip reduction and travel demand. Some of the programs implemented by PCTPA include marketing materials for alternative transportation promotions and site coordinator meetings.

P. Project Controller.

1. A project controller is the owner, lessor and/or manager of a common work location whose tenants, individually or collectively, employ 10 or more but less than 50 employees, or an employer who employs 10 or more but less than 50 employees.

2. A major project controller is the owner, lessor, and/or manager of a major common work location whose tenants, individually or collectively, employ 50 or more employees, or an employer who employs 50 or more persons.

Q. Ridesharing. A commute alternative to driving alone, which includes, but is not limited to, carpooling, vanpooling, public transit, walking and bicycling.

R. Shift of Employment. Any group of employees who work at a common work location or major common work location and who arrive and depart from work in a common time interval not greater than one hour.

S. Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV). A motor vehicle occupied by one employee for commute purposes.

T. Telecommuting (also known as Telework or Work-From-Home). A system of working at home or at an off-work site (non-home telecommute facility) for the full workday on a regular basis for at least one day per week.

U. Transportation Commission. The transportation commission of the City of Roseville.

V. Transportation Coordinator. The person responsible for implementing a TSM plan including employee education, in-house rideshare matching, and posting of information relating to alternative transportation.

1. City Transportation Coordinator. The transportation coordinator of the City of Roseville as designated by the city manager.

2. Site Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Coordinator. The person designated by the employer, property manager, or major project controller who is responsible for implementing a TSM plan at the major common work location. Such person is commonly referred to as the employee transportation coordinator (ETC) or the property transportation coordinator (PTC).

W. Transportation Survey. A survey report designed and distributed by the city’s transportation coordinator and filled out by the site TSM coordinator which provides employee commute information in order to evaluate TSM program effectiveness. 5 X. Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Agreement. Written agreement with the city obligating the applicant to comply with the TSM Plan.

Y. Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Toolkit. An explanatory guide meant to provide clarification for site TSM coordinators and other interested persons. The TSM Toolkit describes how TSM plans are prepared by applicants, reviewed by the city and implemented by the site TSM coordinator.

Z. Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Plan. A plan submitted by an applicant and approved by the city pursuant to this chapter that is designed to reduce the number of vehicle trips to and from a major common work location. Such plan attempts to improve the movement of persons by providing employees with information regarding better and more efficient utilization of existing infrastructure (e.g., streets, roads, freeways) and new and innovative alternative commute modes (e.g., transit, carpooling, bicycling, telecommuting) in accordance with this chapter.

AA. Vanpool. A motor vehicle suited for occupancy by more than seven but less than 16 persons including the driver, traveling to and from work.

BB. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). A measurement of travel demand - it is the number of miles traveled by vehicles in some amount of time (e.g., VMT per day or annual VMT).

SECTION 4. Section 11.33.060 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.060 Project requirements for a common work location.

Every project controller shall encourage the TSM program at a common work location by:

A. Disseminating TSM Information. On a regular basis, share commute alternative information on ridesharing, transit, bicycling and other commute alternatives.

B. Educating new employees about alternative transportation options.

C. Posting TSM Information. Posting in a conspicuous place or places informational materials for employees provided by the city transportation coordinator, PCTPA or other regional rideshare agencies to encourage alternative transportation methods. Such informational material shall be kept current and may include, but is not limited to, the following:

1. Posters or flyers on how to obtain transportation information;

2. Current schedules, rates, procedures for obtaining transit passes, and routes of public transit service to the common work location;

3. Bike route maps;
6 4. Posters or flyers encouraging alternative modes of transportation;

SECTION 5. Section 11.33.070 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.070 Project requirements for a major common work location.

For each existing employer or major common work location having 50 or more employees, and for every employer or common work location upon reaching 50 or more employees, the major project controller shall submit a TSM plan for the major common work location within 90 days of demand by the city. For each proposed development project, the applicant shall submit a TSM plan to the city during the development review stage of the planning process. The TSM plan shall include the following:

A. Project Description. A description of the business activity and operating characteristics of the proposed or existing project (e.g., business hours and peak hours of traffic generation).

B. Employee Description. A description of the tenants and/or employees anticipated at the project site, including the total number of employees per shift and an estimate of their commuting characteristics (e.g., travel distance and mode).

C. Site Plan. A site plan of the project depicting the location of the required bicycle facilities and designated EV capable spaces.

1. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided based on the number of total vehicular parking spaces as follows, or as required by the California Green Building Code, whichever is stricter:
i. Short-term bicycle parking: Provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 100 feet of the main entrance, or as otherwise approved, based on five percent of the visitor parking spaces, where 10 or more total vehicle spaces are provided, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack. ii. Long-Term bicycle parking: Provide secured bicycle parking for five percent of the employee parking spaces, with a minimum of one long-term bicycle parking space where 10 or more total vehicle spaces are provided.

The design and location of the bicycle parking shall be reviewed and approved by Alternative Transportation.

2. EV capable Parking. The major project controller shall designate parking spaces for electric vehicles based on the total number of vehicular parking spaces. The number of spaces shall be as follows, or as required by the California Green Building Code, whichever is stricter:
i. No EV capable spaces required for 0-9 spaces;
7 ii. 4 EV capable spaces for 10-25 spaces;
iii. 8 EV capable spaces for 26-50 spaces;
iv. 13 EV capable spaces for 51-75 spaces;
v. 17 EV capable spaces for 76-100 spaces;
vi. 25 EV capable spaces for 101-150 spaces;
vii. 35 EV capable spaces for 151 - 200 spaces;
viii. At least 20% EV capable for 201 and over spaces.

These spaces shall be marked “EV capable”, or as otherwise determined by Alternative Transportation. The location of the spaces shall be reviewed and approved by Alternative Transportation. A percentage of designated EV capable spaces shall be located for convenient access by the employee.

3. The tenant and visitor parking ratio shall be based on the total parking devoted to employees and visitor as determined through the development review process.

D. Showers and Lockers. To help encourage bicycling as a viable commute transportation alternative, major project controllers shall consider installing showers and lockers for their employees.

E. Site TSM Coordinator. The name, title, address, email and telephone number of the site TSM coordinator shall be included in the TSM plan. This information shall be updated and provided in writing to the city transportation coordinator during the triennial survey or at any time that there is a change in the site TSM coordinator. A statement of such site TSM coordinator’s responsibilities pursuant to Section 11.33.080 of this chapter shall be included in the TSM plan.

SECTION 6. Section 11.33.080 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.080 Site TSM coordinator’s responsibilities.

The site TSM coordinator’s responsibilities include:

A. Monitoring common work locations, communicating with employees and/or tenants, and obtaining information from the city transportation coordinator to meet the requirements of 11.33.60.

B. Marketing the Commuter Rideshare Matchlisting Service. As applicable, disseminating to all tenants and employees, or to new tenants and employees when hired, written information provided by the city transportation coordinator and/or other regional rideshare agencies regarding regional commuter rideshare match listing services. 8 C. Participating in and/or promoting other programs, as applicable. Participating in measures or programs on a voluntary basis or if required by project conditions and/or mitigation measures. Examples of programs include:

1. Emergency Ride Home Program. Participation in this program requires an agreement between the project controller and the City of Roseville. If a site has an agreement, site TSM coordinator shall promote the emergency ride home program. The program provides for the transportation of employees who use alternative transportation modes for home to work commuting in case of a personal, family or other major emergency. The program is designed to help employees get home, to a hospital, clinic, child’s daycare or school. The emergency ride home is a service provided by the City of Roseville.

2. Transit Pass Subsidy. Promoting the use of public transportation by providing to employees a transit pass subsidy to help offset the cost to the employee.

Typically, the employer purchases the transit passes.

3. Vanpool Program. Establishing and/or promoting vanpooling for employees as a cost effective way to commute to work. Typically, the employees lease a van and the vanpool participants shall cover the operating costs for the van.

D. Participating in Informational Meetings and Training Opportunities. The site TSM coordinator will be invited to training events offered by the city’s TSM coordinator and/or other agencies. These training events will include information and materials for promoting such alternative transportation programs.

E. Promoting Alternative Transportation Opportunities. In addition to the above programs, the site TSM coordinator shall encourage employers and employees to use alternative transportation. The city transportation coordinator may provide resources on programs. Such alternative transportation promotional opportunities include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. In-House Carpool Matching Opportunities. Provide an opportunity for employees to identify persons interested in being matched into carpools.

2. Telecommuting (also known as Telework or Work-From-Home). Telecommuting by allowing employees to work regularly and/or periodically from their home or an off-site location close to home.

3. Variable Work Hours. Encouraging employers and employees to eliminate commute trips or relocate the commute trip out of the peak period through the use of:
a. Compressed Work Weeks. A work schedule for an employee which eliminates at least one round trip commute biweekly. For example, 40 hours of work in four 10-hour days or a work plan that allows one day off every other week, known as the nine-eighty plan; b. Staggered work hours involving a shift in the set work hours of all employees at the workplace; and
9 c. Flexible work hours involving individually determined work hours within guidelines established by the employer.

SECTION 7. Section 11.33.090 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.090 Review of TSM plan.

A. During the planning process for new development or for any existing TSM plan, which the applicant proposes to revise, the applicant shall submit the TSM plan to the city transportation coordinator for evaluation for consistency with this chapter.

SECTION 8. Section 11.33.100 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.100 TSM agreement.

If required through a planning document, upon approval of the TSM plan and prior to certificate of occupancy for new construction, or at any time after the approval of a revised TSM plan, the project owner shall enter into a written agreement with the city obligating the project owner to comply with the TSM plan. Such agreement shall be recorded, run with the land and bind all successors in interest, and shall constitute an equitable servitude on the property. Where appropriate, the city may require the agreement to include provisions for enforcement, including right of entry, in the event of breach by the project owner or a successor in interest.

SECTION 9. Section 11.33.110 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

SECTION 10. Section 11.33.120 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.33.120 Transportation survey report.

The city transportation coordinator map periodically prepare and distribute a survey report form to the major project controller. Each major project controller subject to the requirements of this chapter, and all successors in interest of said major project controller obligated to carry out a TSM plan or any part thereof, shall submit a transportation survey report to the city transportation coordinator upon request describing the effectiveness of the TSM plan. The report may contain at a minimum the following information:
10 A. Tenant/Employee Characteristics.

B. Site Characteristics.

C. A description of the measures taken to comply with this chapter.

D. Tenant/Employee Commute Characteristics.

E. A description of any employer sponsored programs, such as vanpool or transit pass subsidy programs.

F. Contact information for the site TSM coordinator.

G. Other Information pertaining to implementation and goals of the TSM program

SECTION 11. Section 11.33.130 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety:

SECTION 12. Section 11.33.140 of Chapter 11.33 of Title 11 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety:

SECTION 13. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 14. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2659
File #:
0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
Title:

Sierra Vista Specific Plan - Baseline Marketplace DF Properties, Inc. - Large Lot Subdivision Final Map
Contact:

Kerry Andrews 916-774-5346 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/3/2023
Item #: 7.22.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the easements offered thereon, but reject at this time, on behalf of the public, all irrevocable offers of dedication, and approve the abandonment of the rights of way and easements listed thereon.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services - Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met.

This map will be creating 28 large lots for future development and 1 public open space lot.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the Baseline Marketplace DF Properties, Inc., Large Lot Subdivision final map is an action that is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project level CEQA compliance for the Baseline Marketplace DF Properties, Inc., Large Lot Subdivision final map was accomplished with preparation of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (Adopted: May 5, 2010) (SCH#2008032017) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program approved by the City of Roseville on June 6, 2012. Because the Baseline Marketplace DF Properties, Inc., Large Lot Subdivision final map is consistent with the project evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Kerry Andrews, Assistant Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Final Map
Vicinity Map

BASELINE ROAD T11NS31S36LS36801988R5E R6E2 - 1/2" BRASS DISC INMONUMENT WELL.ACCEPTED AS SECTION N60°10'08"E 67.68'(1)N54°40'17"W 110.30'(1)N68°41'18"W 51.69'(1)N87°33'02"E 74.58'(1)N59°52'15"E154.14'(1)N80°13'38"E219.54'(1)N83°52'47"E162.86'(1)N77°10'44"E 86.58'(1)N51°40'11"E 42.52'(1)N47°23'32"E 25.38'(1)N43°03'40"E 41.55'(1)N21°58'40"E 36.20'(1)N09°53'32"E 122.16'(1)N10°42'09"W 18.06'(1)N74°08'59"E 91.60'(1)N48°53'50"E 83.92'(1)N03°20'38"E 52.61'(1)N63°26'52"E 168.37'(1)N31°36'42"E 213.90'(1)N72°03'17"E 151.63'(1)N73°26'05"W60.67'(1)N73°22'02"E93.20'(1)N48°51'56"E46.00'(1)N85°47'39"W203.81'(1)N87°59'04"E165.97'(1)N61°03'53"E 113.39'(1)N51°40'01"E 126.45'(1)N00°05'55"W 29.45'(1)N89°38'11"W(1) 195.90'N00°21'49"E 31.25'N87°36'41"E(1) 197.33'N89°38'11"W 584.22'(1)R=985.00' Δ=13°47'57" L=237.23'CB=N82°44'12"W CD=236.65'(1)N68°34'27"W 85.58'(1)N81°27'58"W 186.11'(1)R=50.00' Δ=81°00'00" L=70.69'CB=N40°57'58"W CD=64.94'(1)N04°17'51"E 120.42' N00°27'58"W 374.56'(1)
N00°29'19"E 300.04'(1)N00°27'58"W220.00'(1)R=50.00' Δ=90°44'30" L=79.19'CB=N44°54'17"E CD=71.17'(1)N81°03'30"W 60.83'(1)N89°29'02"E270.00'(1)N88°31'45"E 480.07'(1)N89°29'02"E 118.81'(1)R=5060.00' Δ=1°39'49" L=146.92'CB=N88°39'07"E CD=146.91'(1)N87°49'13"E(1) 214.65'R=50.00' Δ=92°04'52" L=80.36'CB=N46°08'21"W CD=71.98'(1) N00°05'55"W(1)21.66'
N89°54'05"E 80.00'
N00°05'55"W(1)38.21'
R=50.00' Δ=88°44'10" L=77.44'CB=N44°16'10"E CD=69.93'(1)N82°24'39"W 60.90'(1)R=4940.00' Δ=0°50'24" L=72.41'CB=N88°54'38"E CD=72.41'(1)N89°19'50"E 925.79'(1)R=50.00' Δ=90°00'00" L=78.54'CB=N45°40'10"W CD=70.71'(1) N00°40'10"W 37.17'(1)
N89°19'50"E 80.00'(1)
N00°40'10"W47.17'(1)
R=50.00' Δ=90°47'30" L=79.23'CB=N44°43'35"E CD=71.20'(1)N89°19'50"E 1094.34'(1)N00°12'39"E 302.08'(1) N88°51'20"E 112.06'(1)
N89°29'02"E 2642.10'(1)
N14°09'46"E(R)(1)N89°32'02"E(R)(1)
S00°16'32"W(R)(1)S01°21'45"E(R)(1)
S00°07'20"W(R)(1)
567 4
321
13121011 89141615
18 20
19 2223
2425262728
LOT A
S01°30'33"E(R)(1)N81°12'25"W 60.80'(1)N89°29'24"E 1350.58'(1)N00°12'39"E 38.06'(1) 17 21
BASIS OF BEARINGSSOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEASTQUARTER OF SECTION 36T11N R5ES 1/4SEC 362" DISC IN STANDARD CITYOF ROSEVILLE MONUMENTWELL PER (1) STAMPED:LS92652021 CORNER PER (2)(3)36 31T11NT10NCITY OF ROSEVILLECOUNTY OF PLACERAPPROXIMATE COUNTY LINE

MARKET STREETPAVILION DRIVE

UPLAND DRIVE

FIDDYMENT ROAD

MEADOW BLOOM COURTSHASTA DAISY CIRCLE

BEE BALM COURTSAN FERNANDO DRIVE
R5ER6E
STAMPED:
2RECORD DATA PER REFERENCE( )
LEGEND FF MAPS 21(1)

DIMENSION POINT
5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 9265" PER (1)REFERENCES:BASIS OF BEARINGS:
1SHEET INDEX

ACRESAC
COPPERWELD SURVEY MONUMENT WITH CENTER PUNCHIN MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "LS 9265" TO BE SET PER (1)SET COPPERWELD SURVEY MONUMENT WITH CENTERPUNCH IN MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "LS 9265"

RADIAL BEARING(R)
NOTES:

CENTERLINE

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTPUERIGHT OF WAYR/WSQUARE FEETSF
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS N 89°29'02" E, BETWEEN FOUNDMONUMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER OFSECTION 36 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "SIERRAVISTA DF PROPERTIES, INC. LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION, SUBDIVISION NO.PL15-0192" RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 2020 IN BOOK FF OF MAPS, AT PAGE21, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS.

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTYOROVERALL(OA)
22 RS 135(2)FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTEDFOUND QUARTER SECTION CORNER AS NOTED

CHORD BEARINGCBCHORD DISTANCECDFDFOUNDDNDOCUMENT NUMBER

PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTPE
DD MAPS 26(3)

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

MAEMAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENTJUAJOINT USE AGREEMENT

1.ALL CURVES ARE DIMENSIONED WITH RADIUS, DELTA, ARC LENGTH, CHORD BEARINGAND CHORD LENGTH. DUE TO ROUNDING THE SUM OF INDIVIDUAL DIMENSIONS MAYNOT EQUAL THE OVERALL DIMENSION. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE IN FEET ANDDECIMALS THEREOF AND ARE "GROUND" DISTANCES.2.TOTAL AREA FOR THIS SUBDIVISION IS 81.229± ACRES, CONSISTING OF 28 LARGE LOTSAND 1 OPEN SPACE LOT.3.PURSUANT TO SECTION 66499.20.2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, THE LANDS SHOWNHEREON ARE HEREBY MERGED AND RESUBDIVIDED, AND THE FOLLOWINGIRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICATION AND EASEMENTS THAT FALL WITHIN THESUBJECT PROPERTY, NOT SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY ABANDONED:A.RIGHT-OF-WAY OF UPLAND DRIVE AND A PORTION OF SAN FERNANDO DRIVE ANDBASELINE ROAD AS SHOWN ON FF MAPS 21.B.PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS AND LANDSCAPEEASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON FF MAPS 21.4.PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH THE FIRST CONVEYANCE, BY THE SUBDIVIDER, OF ALOT CREATED WITH THIS MAP, RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS FOR ACCESS, PARKING,PRIVATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES, INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCETHEREOF, SHALL BE RECORDED BY SEPARATE EASEMENT DOCUMENT(S) OR ADECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS. IF SUBDIVIDERDEVELOPS ANY LOT PRIOR TO CONVEYANCE, A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS,CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SHALL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO CITY APPROVAL OFTHE FIRST SITE PLAN PERMIT.5.THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AND ACCESS EASEMENT IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 6,2017, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2017-0041424, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY ISFULLY CONTAINED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWNHEREON. THE TERM OF SAID EASEMENT TERMINATES ONE YEAR FOLLOWINGACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE.

MONMONUMENTRECORD OF SURVEYRS CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA FINAL MAP OFLARGE LOT SUBDIVISIONBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 6, 7, AND 8 AND A PORTION OF THERIGHT-OF-WAY OF UPLAND DRIVE, SAN FERNANDO DRIVE AND BASELINE ROAD OF THATCERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "SIERRA VISTA DF PROPERTIES, INC., LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION,SUBDIVISION NO. PL15-0192" FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTOBER 29, 2020 IN BOOK FF OF MAPS,AT PAGE 21, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS. LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OFSECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN.

ADJACENT PROPERTYEASEMENT/IODBOUNDARY

SECTION LINELOT LINELOT LINE & RIGHT-OF-WAY

CENTER LINEMUNICIPAL BOUNDARYEXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYC/L
3 5
4 6
7 SET 1" DIAMETER BRASS DISC STAMPED "LS 9265" ON A 1.00SET 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 9265"FOOT PROJECTION OF THE SIDE LOT LINE INTO THE GUTTER PAN

17.5'17.5'17.5'

17.5'

17.5'
27'17.5'

17.5'
N46°28'17"W 82.65'
C4(OA)
N77°47'46"E 178.21'
N77°47'46"E 188.61'

40.00'40.00'N00°40'10"W(1) 83.19'
N00°40'10"W 330.52'

18.28'
N17°59'46"W 68.38'
R=195.00' Δ=17°19'36" L=58.97'CB=N09°19'58"W CD=58.74'36.02'47.17'(1)R=50.00' Δ=90°47'30" L=79.23'CB=N44°43'35"E CD=71.20'(1)N81°12'25"W60.80'(1)123.22' N01°05'51"W 99.04'
100.69'59.59'
115.71'N00°40'10"W 80.00'
N89°19'50"E 12.29'N00°40'10"W 98.96'
N89°19'50"E 4.00'N00°40'10"W 27.00'N89°19'50"E 33.26'N08°56'38"W64.70'52.63'N77°47'46"E 150.00'N68°20'01"E 60.83'11.32' 296.26'N00°40'10"W 127.44'
R=400.00' Δ=8°16'28" L=57.77'CB=N04°48'24"W CD=57.72'N00°40'10"W 207.04' 208.54'8.20'
226.00'N89°19'50"E 1094.34'(1)
N00°12'39"E 302.08'(1)
C1
R=267.50' Δ=41°45'13" L=194.94'CB=N81°19'38"W CD=190.65' 113.66'
N87°15'40"E60.81'N77°47'46"E 150.11'N68°18'11"E60.63'R=232.50' Δ=41°45'13" L=169.43'CB=N81°19'38"W CD=165.71'C334.89'N54°40'17"W 110.30'(1)N68°41'18"W 51.69'(1)N87°33'02"E74.58'(1)N59°52'15"E 154.14'(1) N80°13'38"E 219.54'(1)N83°52'47"E 162.86'(1)N60°10'08"E 67.68'(1)N77°10'44"E 86.58'(1)N51°40'11"E 42.52'(1)N47°23'32"E 25.38'(1)N43°03'40"E 41.55'(1)N76°41'58"W68.50'N01°13'28"E(R)78.31' L3
R=235.00'Δ=101°32'05"L=416.45'CB=N51°26'12"WCD=364.05'L1C2R=250.00'Δ=41°45'13"L=182.18'CB=N81°19'38"WCD=178.18' N77°47'46"E 760.08'
L2

1.475±AC28 1.178±AC27 1.762±AC26 43,231 SF25 1.602±AC24 29,344 SFLOT A
333.15'
N77°47'46"E 322.20'
230.04'N21°16'35"E(R)N19°44'22"E(R)
N18°24'55"E(R) N87°15'30"E 60.83'N77°47'46"E 112.01'N84°08'27"E 77.87'R=210.00'Δ=36°08'09"L=132.45'CB=N78°15'11"WCD=130.26' N89°19'50"E 80.00'(1)
N00°12'39"E(1)60.01' N89°29'24"E 1245.60'(1)38.06'(1)21.95'(1) N89°19'50"E 1245.93'(1)N00°40'10"W 18.48'(1)N00°40'10"W 128.69'(1)N89°29'24"E 104.98'(1) N46°28'17"W 82.65'N29°48'54"E(R)

16.26'109.33' 6.41'

12.51'

11.14'N77°47'46"E 13.92'
N06°19'16"W(R)
S00°07'20"W(R)
N77°47'46"E 125.59'N42°12'14"W 17.32'N42°12'14"W 19.63' N42°12'14"W 17.32'N77°47'46"E 7.97'C7N12°12'14"W 27.33' N42°12'14"W 22.38'C6
C8 N49°30'34"W 65.00'65.09'L4L5
C9
C1012.5' PUE
VARIABLE WIDTH PUE44.83' FROM C/L

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE 40'
40'25'17.5' 25'27'27'27'

17.5'17.5'

CITY OF ROSEVILLECOUNTY OF PLACERAPPROXIMATE COUNTY LINEBASELINE ROAD

PAVILION DRIVE

20.5' PUE50' PIPELINE EASEMENTPER DN 2020-001275115' TEMPORARY PUEPER DN 2018-002310050' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONEASEMENT PER DN 2020-001275140' PUE(1)TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADPER DN 2020-0012751 VALVE LOT EASEMENTPER DN 2020-0012751
T11N R5ES 1/4SEC 36
2" DISC IN STANDARD CITYOF ROSEVILLE MONUMENTWELL PER (1) STAMPED:LS92652021

12.5' PUE
60'
PUE

12.5' PUE

9.33' PUE

9.33' PUE17.5'

9.33' PUE
PUE
N59°52'15"E 154.14'(1)N87°33'02"E 74.58'(1)R=232.50'Δ=41°45'13"L=169.43'CB=N81°19'38"WCD=165.71' N77°47'46"E 125.59'109.33'PAVILION DRIVE Line TableLine #L1L2L3L4L5
BearingN00°12'39"EN00°12'39"EN00°40'10"WN40°29'26"EN40°29'26"E Length18.66'18.49'36.02'38.74'35.29'
Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10
Radius232.50'250.00'267.50'252.50'2.00'2.00'2.00'2.00'235.00'235.00' Delta8°16'24"9°48'37"11°08'04"32°08'22"52°09'24"120°00'00"60°00'00"120°00'00"52°41'41"48°50'24" Length33.57'42.81'51.98'141.64'1.82'4.19'2.09'4.19'216.13'200.32' ChordBearingN64°35'13"WN65°21'20"WN66°01'03"WN78°17'28"WN68°16'57"WN17°47'46"EN72°12'14"WN17°47'46"EN75°51'24"WN25°05'22"W ChordLength33.54'42.75'51.90'139.79'1.76'3.46'2.00'3.46'208.59'194.31' (R)N42°12'14"W 22.38'R=252.50'Δ=32°08'22"L=141.64'CB=N78°17'28"WCD=139.79'(OA) 29,344 SFLOT AC5Δ=5°35'07"L=24.61'CB=N88°25'55"ECD=24.60'17.5'PAVILION DRIVE3 SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, NOTES AND REFERENCES.

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA
FINAL MAP OFLARGE LOT SUBDIVISIONBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 6, 7, AND 8 AND A PORTION OF THERIGHT-OF-WAY OF UPLAND DRIVE, SAN FERNANDO DRIVE AND BASELINE ROAD OF THATCERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "SIERRA VISTA DF PROPERTIES, INC., LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION,SUBDIVISION NO. PL15-0192" FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTOBER 29, 2020 IN BOOK FF OF MAPS,AT PAGE 21, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS. LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OFSECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN.

SHEET OF 718476.LLM COMMAPRIL 2023SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0386BASELINE MARKETPLACEDF PROPERTIES, INC. 1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189 DETAIL "3A"SCALE: 1"=10'
SEE DETAIL "3A"ON THIS SHEET
SEE SHEET 4
SEE DETAIL "3B"ON THIS SHEET
DETAIL "3B"SCALE: 1"=10'

43.22'N56°39'00"W 89.82' Δ=11°11'52"L=187.62'CB=N84°14'01"WCD=187.32' 53.92' N00°05'55"W 219.64'N00°05'55"W(1) 38.21'R=50.00' Δ=88°44'10" L=77.44'CB=N44°16'10"E CD=69.93'(1)N82°24'39"W60.90'(1)R=4940.00' Δ=0°50'24" L=72.41'CB=N88°54'38"E CD=72.41'(1)50.43'N00°02'53"W 359.16'184.23'N86°29'03"W 31.84'N00°05'55"W 51.34' R=200.00' Δ=28°11'31" L=98.41'CB=N14°45'55"W CD=97.42'6.92'N70°31'29"E 211.96'N00°05'55"W 45.97'N89°54'05"E 120.42' 291.71'N00°40'10"W 53.17'
131.20'Δ=8°27'13" L=22.13'CB=N50°53'25"E CD=22.11'R=465.00'Δ=40°47'56"L=331.12'CB=N67°03'46"ECD=324.16' N87°27'44"E54.25'Δ=2°42'18" L=45.32'CB=N88°48'54"E CD=45.32' N89°59'51"W51.74'Δ=34°53'08" L=91.33'CB=N72°33'35"E CD=89.93' 265.89'
N00°00'00"E 240.91'N84°21'42"E 373.00'
185.68'
317.77'R=50.00' Δ=90°00'00" L=78.54'CB=N45°40'10"W CD=70.71'(1)37.17'(1)36.02' Δ=33°51'08" L=162.48'CB=N23°53'33"W CD=160.13'
N21°58'40"E 36.20'(1)N09°53'32"E 122.16'(1)
N10°42'09"W18.06'(1)48.09'N61°12'40"W 300.80'
134.77'N29°00'11"E 187.91'
N84°21'42"E 36.40'
N05°38'18"W 416.18'55.23'

40.00'40.00'1.424±AC20

1.498±AC23

1.632±AC16

1.270±AC15 2.110±AC14

43.51'N74°08'59"E91.60'(1)
N01°13'28"E(R)78.31'N76°41'58"W68.50'
N89°19'50"E 925.79'(1)
N28°51'41"W 138.12'
174.92'
R=150.00'Δ=43°20'21"L=113.46'CB=N68°19'59"ECD=110.78'
N00°10'03"E(R)
N00°05'55"W 1176.91'(OA)
S01°21'45"E(R)(1)S01°30'33"E(R)(1)N89°54'05"E80.00'

3.167±AC19
C1
R=30.00' Δ=89°06'01" L=46.65'CB=N34°05'05"W CD=42.09' S34°52'59"E(R)
R=500.00' Δ=9°40'15" L=84.39'CB=N33°50'18"E CD=84.29'C5(OA)N33°21'00"E 44.51'N64°14'21"W 100.41'47.39'9.80'N33°21'00"E56.48' C2
L3
N00°40'10"W128.69'(1)N89°29'24"E104.98'(1)N00°40'10"W 18.48'(1)N89°29'24"E 1245.60'(1)(OA)1132.03'(1) 453.66'(1)N89°29'02"E 2642.10'(1)(OA)N00°05'55"W 11.07'(1)N00°05'55"W123.93'(1) N89°54'05"E 45.00'N10°27'56"E60.00'
R=960.00'Δ=13°54'10"L=232.94'CB=N85°35'11"WCD=232.37'N00°05'55"W 91.00'N89°54'05"E 52.00' N04°18'01"E91.27'
N89°19'50"E80.00'40.00'40.00'24.68'12.49'N00°40'10"W(1)73.19' N49°10'52"E(R)S51°19'34"E(R)
674.00'Δ=6°17'49" L=30.22'CB=N03°49'05"W CD=30.21'N83°02'01"E(R)324.50'48.50'1.372±AC17 R=50.00' Δ=55°12'29" L=48.18'CB=S56°36'26"W CD=46.34'N84°12'40"E 143.86'N84°22'43"E66.28' Δ=26°33'15"L=117.02'CB=N75°29'54"WCD=115.98'C4
C3
N27°46'43"E(R)12.5' PUE
40'
40'25'17.5'25'

CITY OF ROSEVILLECOUNTY OF PLACERAPPROXIMATE COUNTY LINEBASELINE ROAD

20.5' PUE 50' PIPELINE EASEMENTPER DN 2020-001275115' TEMPORARY PUEPER DN 2018-002310050' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONEASEMENT PER DN 2020-001275140' PUE(1) T11N R5ES 1/4SEC 36
2" DISC IN STANDARD CITYOF ROSEVILLE MONUMENTWELL PER (1) STAMPED:LS92652021 UPLAND DRIVE25' PUE
40'
29'18'
PAVILIONDRIVE15' PUE
BASIS OF BEARINGS60' 60'
PUEPUE
NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER LINESECTION 36, T11N, R5E
Line TableLine #L3BearingN00°40'10"WLength36.02'Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4C5 Radius275.00'235.00'235.00'235.00'252.50'
Delta40°08'58"101°32'05"48°50'24"52°41'41"32°08'22"
Length192.70'416.45'200.32'216.13'141.64'
ChordBearingN20°44'39"WN51°26'12"WN25°05'22"WN75°51'24"WN78°17'28"W ChordLength188.78'364.05'194.31'208.59'139.79'
(R)
N10°27'56"E 60.00'(OA)
R=30.00'Δ=89°06'01"L=46.65'CB=N34°05'05"WCD=42.09'6.08'N04°18'01"E 91.27'

53.92'N89°54'05"E 45.00'2.110±AC14

UPLAND DRIVE
PUE
4 SEE SHEET 3

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

SHEET OF 718476.LLM COMMAPRIL 2023SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0386BASELINE MARKETPLACEDF PROPERTIES, INC. 1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189 SEE SHEET 7
SEE SHEET 5
SEE DETAIL "4A"ON THIS SHEET
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, NOTES AND REFERENCES.DETAIL "4A"SCALE: 1"=10' SEE SHEET 3

60.00'N00°05'55"W 2.92'17.00'

6.78'N89°38'11"W(1) 195.90'
1170.13'N00°05'55"W 1176.91'(OA)N11°54'09"E72.23'

25.4'
N03°20'38"E52.61'(1)43.51'Δ=47° 52' 14" L=41.77'CB=N52°56'18"E' CD=40.57'R=50.00' Δ=55°12'29" L=48.18'CB=N56°36'26"E CD=46.34'N84°12'40"E 143.86' N05°38'15"W 455.56'

93.24'N88°51'20"E 112.06'(1)N73°26'05"W 60.67'(1)N73°22'02"E93.20'(1)N48°51'56"E 46.00'(1)N85°47'39"W 203.81'(1)N87°59'04"E 165.97'(1)N61°03'53"E 113.39'(1)N51°40'01"E 126.45'(1) N00°05'55"W29.45'(1)N11°54'09"E72.23'N06°34'10"W 124.40' N00°05'55"W 181.98'N06°57'59"E 60.00'
N03°13'51"W 135.05'
N00°05'55"W 174.01'N03°43'27"E 60.00'
N04°18'01"E 91.27'

53.14'
N48°53'50"E83.92'(1)
N63°26'52"E 168.37'(1)N05°38'13"W 321.37'
153.96'58.39'
N00°05'55"W 1176.91'(OA)

17.00'6.78'

1.406±AC22 16.778±AC18
N61°12'40"W 300.80'
N29°00'11"E 187.91'(OA)
N84°21'42"E 36.40'
N05°38'18"W 416.18'55.23'N89°59'51"W51.74'
R=150.00'Δ=43°20'21"L=113.46'CB=N68°19'59"ECD=110.78'R=465.00'Δ=40°47'56"L=331.12'CB=N67°03'46"ECD=324.16'N87°27'44"E 54.25'R=960.00'Δ=13°54'10"L=232.94'CB=N85°35'11"WCD=232.37'R=30.00' Δ=89°06'01" L=46.65'CB=N34°05'05"W CD=42.09' N74°08'59"E91.60'(1)

37.26'(1)22.68'
134.77'N13°07'35"W(R)Δ=7° 20' 15" L=6.40'CB=N80°32'33"E' CD=6.40' N72°03'17"E 151.63'(1)
N00°00'00"E 240.91'(OA)Δ=34° 53' 08" L=91.33'CB=N72°33'35"E' CD=89.93' Δ=8° 27' 13" L=22.13'CB=N50°53'25"E' CD=22.11'S34°52'59"E(R) Δ=2° 42' 18" L=45.32'CB=N88°48'54"E' CD=45.32'Δ=11°11'52"L=187.62'CB=N84°14'01"WCD=187.32'N00°10'03"E(R) N89°38'11"W(1) 195.90'60.00'
N89°54'05"E 45.00'
N00°05'55"W 91.00'N89°54'05"E 52.00'

18.88'91.14'25.04'N89°54'05"E 70.63'
N89°54'05"E 65.65'
N00°05'55"W 91.00'

14.70'84.54'25.16'N89°54'05"E 75.16'N00°05'55"W 84.00'N89°54'05"E65.64'

48.09' 674.00' 496.14'

1.406±AC21
N84°22'43"E66.28'
N31°36'42"E 213.90'(1)
N84°21'42"E 373.00'(OA)48.50'

12.5' PUE
40'
40'25'17.5'17.5'25'PAVILION DRIVE

UPLAND DRIVE
VARIABLE WIDTH PUE48' FROM CENTERLINE
40'
29'18'
29'18'
29'18'
18'
29'
VARIABLE WIDTH PUE43' FROM CENTERLINE
PUE
PUE
PUE
NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER LINESECTION 36, T11N, R5E
25' PUE

36.4'
N10°27'56"E 60.00'(OA)
R=30.00'Δ=89°06'01"L=46.65'CB=N34°05'05"WCD=42.09'6.08'N04°18'01"E 91.27'

53.92'N89°54'05"E 45.00'2.110±AC14
5 SEE SHEET 4

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

SHEET OF 718476.LLM COMMAPRIL 2023SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0386BASELINE MARKETPLACEDF PROPERTIES, INC. 1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189 DETAIL "5A"SCALE: 1"=10'
SEE DETAIL "5A"ON THIS SHEETSEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 4
SEE DETAIL "5B"ON THIS SHEET
DETAIL "5B"SCALE: 1"=10'SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, NOTES AND REFERENCES.

SAN FERNANDODRIVE

25.4'UPLAND DRIVE
VARIABLE WIDTHPUE 59' FROM C/L
40'
29'18'
29'18'
29'18'
18'
29'
VARIABLE WIDTHPUE 54' FROM C/L

12.5' PUE19' PE
PUE PER DN 2012-0062885JUA PER DN 2013-0002031
PG&E EASEMENT PERDN 2006-0025101JUA PER DN 2013-0002031 PG&E EASEMENT PERDN 2006-0025101JUA PER DN 2013-0002031

FIDDYMENT ROAD

SAN FERNANDO DRIVE
R5ER6E
15'15' 15'15' 28' 28'50'
60'
60'
PUE
PUE
N00°27'58"W 1185.60'(1)R=515.00' Δ=7°27'30" L=67.04'CB=N86°44'13"W CD=66.99'N89°32'02"E 132.48'N88°03'06"W 90.98'N89°32'02"E 163.97'R=469.00' Δ=4°09'24" L=34.03'CB=N88°23'16"W CD=34.02'N03°41'26"E(R) 16.00'R=485.00' Δ=3°18'05" L=27.95'CB=N84°39'31"W CD=27.94' Δ=4° 15' 15" L=38.24'CB=N85°08'06"W' CD=38.23'14.00'N00°30'47"W 2.71'Δ=10°49'33"L=183.09'CB=N84°04'32"ECD=182.81'R=969.00'Δ=21°39'05"L=366.17'CB=N89°29'18"ECD=364.00'N00°30'47"W 2.14'14.00'N89°00'27"E 292.09'208.00' N89°28'49"E 218.35'
181.77'N00°32'35"W 177.71'
N00°21'08"E 464.13'
166.34'R=985.00' Δ=13°47'57" L=237.23'CB=N82°44'12"W CD=236.65'(1)N68°34'27"W 85.58'(1)N81°27'58"W 186.11'(1)R=50.00' Δ=81°00'00" L=70.69'CB=N40°57'58"W CD=64.94'(1) N04°17'51"E 120.42'(1)
N00°27'58"W 374.56'(1)

21.47'N00°30'47"W 362.79'231.71'
170.00'N00°31'30"W 179.88'
R=600.00'Δ=17°15'03"L=180.65'CB=N89°22'40"ECD=179.97'
N00°07'11"E 373.19'
N01°52'49"W 39.00'N89°38'11"W 584.22'(1)

46.05'N03°55'16"W 60.00'N00°05'55"W 119.63'

8.77'296.85'51.23'N03°09'15"W 138.43'
N00°05'55"W 316.37'
R=80.00' Δ=87°42'36" L=122.47'CB=N43°45'23"E CD=110.85'12.85'197.33'N89°38'11"W118.85'24.48'N89°38'11"W(1) 195.90'6.78'

4.588±AC1

1.589±AC13

7.218±AC2

12.039±AC3
38,713 SF4
N00°21'49"E31.25'N87°36'41"E 210.18'(1)417.88' N14°09'46"E(R)(1) N00°29'19"E 300.04'(1)124.18'8.30'Δ=3° 12' 15" L=28.80'CB=N88°51'51"W' CD=28.80'149.97'Δ=10°49'33"L=183.09'CB=N85°05'56"WCD=182.82'N89°10'16"E 222.00' S02°44'17"W(R)
N10°18'51"E(R)N00°30'42"W(R)N11°20'14"W(R)31.03'N00°30'47"W 262.74' N89°29'13"E 466.85'
N04°30'07"W 91.17'
N06°57'59"E60.00'
N00°05'55"W 1176.91'(OA)

6.78'
N89°32'02"E(R)

23.42'96.14'18.88'
N89°54'05"E 70.75'
N89°54'05"E 65.63'N00°05'55"W 96.00'

45.06'N89°54'05"E 51.92'N00°05'55"W 91.00'
N89°54'05"E 45.00'45.12'
N00°05'55"W279.71'(OA)1.09'
N09°14'52"W(R)N08°00'11"E(R)
118.90'674.00'
496.14'
N81°27'58"W 275.00'(1)29'R=500.00' Δ=6°53'37" L=60.16'CB=N78°01'10"W CD=60.12'(1) R=1000.00' Δ=15°03'49" L=262.91'CB=N82°06'16"W CD=262.15'(1)N89°38'11"W 781.32'(1)

Roseville City CouncilMay 3, 2023

Roseville City Council
May 3, 2023