Agenda packet — Roseville City Council, October 18, 2023 (part 1 of 3)

AGENDA
October 18, 2023
VIDEO

CITY COUNCIL
6:00 p.m.

Council Chambers
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA
www.roseville.ca.us

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WELCOMES YOUR PARTICIPATION
If an agenda item is open to public comment, such public comment shall be addressed to the chair of the meeting.

Public Comment
- Speakers have three minutes under Public Comment to speak on issues that
are not listed on the agenda and are within the City's jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda.

Consent Calendar
- If applicable, the Consent Calendar consists of routine items that may be approved by one motion. Any person can remove an item from the Consent Calendar to be discussed separately.

Agenda Items
- Speakers have five minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.

Americans with Disabilities Act
- Notify the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance if special assistance is required to participate in a meeting including the need of auxiliary aids or services.

Audio/Visual Presentations
- If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance.

Security procedures are in place to attend Roseville City Council meetings.

All attendees must
successfully pass through a security metal detector.

Any person with a prohibited item will not be
allowed entry.

Prohibited items include, but are not limited to: firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/ any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs and alcohol.

Roseville City Clerk 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 916-774-5200 TDD 916-774-5220

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. MEETING PROCEDURES

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1. Proclamation - Domestic Violence Awareness Month October 2023 Proclaim October 2023 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in Roseville and recognizes the vital role that all Californians can play in preventing and one day ending domestic violence.

CONTACT:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS

7. CONSENT CALENDAR

BEGINNING OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes

7.1. Minutes of Prior Meeting
Memo from City Clerk Technician Melissa Lipp and City Clerk Carmen Avalos recommending the City Council approve the minutes of the September 20, 2023 City Council Closed Session Meeting, the September 20, 2023 City Council Meeting, the October 4, 2023 City Council Closed Session Meeting, and the October 4, 2023 City Council/Housing Authority Meeting.

CC #:
3007
File #:
0102-03
CONTACT:

Melissa Lipp 916-774-5268 [email protected]

Bids / Purchases / Services

7.2. Office Supplies - Purchase Orders
Memo from Buyer Becky Philipp and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-417 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR OFFICE
SUPPLIES. Staff requests Council approval of purchase orders for office supplies on an as-needed basis by City departments through ODP Business Solutions, LLC. utilizing Oakland County, Michigan’s America Saves Program cooperative contract number 010418.

The estimated total for office supplies to
be purchased for three years is $1,010,000.

Funding is included in each
department's budget. Spending for future years will be contingent upon Council approval of budgets.

CC #:
3001
File #:
0203-04
CONTACT:

Becky Philipp 916-746-1110 [email protected]

7.3. Vehicle Purchase - Sole Source Purchase Order and Budget Adjustment Memo from Acting Electric Finance Administrator Joanna Cucchi and Electric Utility Director Dan Beans recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION 23-405 APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE
ORDER FOR TWO 2027 INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS WITH AN ALTEC
D3060E 60’ LARGE DISTRIBUTION DIGGER DERRICK; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6735 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO
THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve a sole source purchase order with Altec Industries Inc. for two 2027 International trucks with an Altec D3060E 60’ large distribution digger derrick in the amount of $1,199,498.89. Staff also requests approval of a budget adjustment for the Electric Department of $1,199,498.89 to fund the purchase of these two electric line trucks in the FY2023-24 Electric Fund budget.

CC #:
6735
File #:
0203-07 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Joanna Cucchi 916-746-1609 [email protected]

7.4. Disposal and Auction Services – Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Buyer Tiffany Valdez and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-419 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND J.J. KANE
ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA J.J. KANE AUCTIONEERS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3003328). Staff requests Council approval of a contract purchase agreement with J.J. Kane Associates, Inc. for disposal and auction services for surplus vehicles, equipment, parts, etc. This is a revenue- generating agreement and the cost of the services are paid by the bidders. The revenue generated from the agreement is estimated to be approximately $500,000 annually. The portion of revenue generated by the Fleet Division will be returned to the Fleet Replacement Fund or the Electric Fund, and the portion of revenue generated by the Purchasing/Central Stores Division will be returned to the General Fund, or other funds as appropriate. Staff also requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to execute one additional one-year contract extension, utilizing the same Sourcewell contract without further Council approval, based on staff's determination that continuing this service is in the City's best interest.

CC #:
3004
File #:
0203-02
CONTACT:

Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected]

7.5. Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants Replacement Filtering Media – Sole Source Purchase Order
Memo from Administrative Technician Audrey Ficker and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-415 APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER FOR

REPLACEMENT FILTERING MEDIA FOR THE GAS CONDITIONING

SYSTEMS LOCATED AT THE DRY CREEK AND PLEASANT GROVE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS. Staff requests Council approval of a sole source purchase order for Unison Solution Inc. to purchase replacement filtering media for the Gas Conditioning Systems located at the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants. Staff also requests authorization for the City Manager or designee to approve three (3) additional one (1) year purchase order renewals. The estimated cost of this purchase including the renewals is $800,000. Funding for this purchase will be provided by the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual budget in the Wastewater Operations Fund.

CC #:
2997
File #:
0203-09
CONTACT:

Audrey Ficker 916-746-1865 [email protected]

Resolutions

7.6. Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Recovery Project – Installment Sale Agreement Amendment
Memo from Principal Engineer Tracie Mueller and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-418

APPROVING THE INSTALLMENT SALE AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 3 FOR THE PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER

TREATMENT EXPANSION AND ENERGY RECOVERY PROJECT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE CALIFORNIA

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests
Council approval of the Installment Sale
Agreement Amendment for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan from the California State Water Resources Control Board for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Recovery Project. The amendment
extends the final disbursement request date from July 31, 2023 to January 31, 2024 at
the low interest loan (1.3 percent) of $29,674,755
. This action
has no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

CC #:
3002
File #:
0800-02
CONTACT:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

7.7. Landfill Water Quality and Gas Monitoring Services – Professional Services Agreement
Memo from Environmental Utilities Compliance Administrator Michelle White and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-412

APPROVING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE.

Staff requests Council approve a professional
services agreement with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. for Water Quality and Landfill Gas Monitoring and Reporting Services and other Regulatory-Required Technical Assistance. The agreement requires multiple ground and surface water samplings and landfill gas emissions monitoring to ensure the levels of emissions do not pose a public health hazard. These services are needed to remain in compliance with State and Federal requirements for closed landfills.

The initial contract cost is $557,640 and spread across three fiscal years (FY2023-24, $87,360; FY2024-25, $213,840; FY2025-26 $256,440). The current fiscal year amount is included in the Waste Services Operations Fund budget and future fiscal years will be included in the respective budgets.

CC #:
2993
File #:
0800-02
CONTACT:

Michelle White 916-774-5774 [email protected]

7.8. Resolution Declaring Weeds and Rubbish a Public Nuisance Memo from Deputy City Attorney Travis Cochran and Administrative Battalion Chief Michael Bradley recommending the City Council adopt

RESOLUTION
NO. 23-420 DECLARING THAT A PUBLIC NUISANCE EXISTS IN

CONNECTION WITH THE EXISTENCE OF WEEDS, DIRT, RUBBISH,

AND/OR RANK GROWTHS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND DIRECTING THE FIRE CHIEF OR HIS DESIGNEE TO

PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE
. Staff requests Council approval of a resolution so
that staff may move forward with the weed abatement process, as weeds and/or other rubbish exist on the property and have not been abated by the property owner and directing the Fire Chief or his designee to give notice of the approving of the resolution and setting the time and place for the required public hearing. There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed Resolution. If the City incurs costs to abate the nuisance, such costs may be charged to the property owner and constitute a special assessment and lien against the property.

CC #:
3005
File #:
0320-01
CONTACT:

Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]

Michael Bradley 916-774-4710 [email protected]

7.9. Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Lease Agreement
Memo from Facility Manager Dan Allen and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-416

APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF LEASE,

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PLACER COUNTY

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THEM ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve the lease agreement with the Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA). The lease agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which the SPCA will occupy approximately 10,000 square feet of existing building space, covered storage area, and outside paved area located at 100 Corporation Yard Road.

Execution of the lease agreement would result in a
positive fiscal impact to the General Fund of $22,980 annually, which would be applied towards the facility's maintenance and upkeep.

CC #:
2999
File #:
1006-01
CONTACT:

Dan Allen 916-774-5741 [email protected]

7.10. State Legislative Advocacy Services - Professional Services Agreement Memo from Utility Government Relations Administrator Noelle Mattock and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-407 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP, LLP DBA RENNE

PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve a professional services agreement with Renne Public Policy Group to provide state legislative advocacy services for the Environmental Utilities Department. The proposed agreement will cost $10,000 per month, or $120,000 annually, and will be funded through an equal share from the Water Operations Fund, the Wastewater Operations Fund, and the Waste Services Operations Fund, each funded through utility sales revenue.

CC #:
2988
File #:
0114
CONTACT:

Noelle Mattock 916-774-5504 [email protected]

7.11. 2023 Citizens' Benefit Fund Policy Manual Updates Memo from Management Analyst Tobi Thomas and Assistant City Manager Dion Louthan recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23- 403

APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE CITIZENS BENEFIT FUND
POLICY MANUAL.

Staff requests Council approve recommended revisions to the Citizens' Benefit Fund Policy Manual. Each year, the Grants Advisory Commission reviews the past year's grant funding cycle documents and updates them, as needed, for the upcoming funding cycle. During the last cycle, the Commission discussed several policies to clarify for the upcoming 2024/2025 funding cycle. Specifically clarifying the language in two sections - bid requirements and site visits. The policy manual has no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

CC #:
2983
File #:
0103-34-02
CONTACT:

Tobi Thomas 916-746-1368 [email protected]

7.12. Sierra View Country Club - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Memo from Associate Engineer David Samuelson and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-414 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SVCC 75, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND APPROVE THE SIERRA VIEW COUNTRY CLUB
FINAL MAP. The Engineering Department has completed its review of the final map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will be creating 75 residential lots, 1 private road lot and 11 private common area lots. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

CC #:
2995
File #:
0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
CONTACT:

David Samuelson 916-774-5442 [email protected]

7.13. Sierra Vista Torrente - Phase 1 Project - Notice of Completion Memo from Senior Construction Inspector Andrew Druck
and Development
Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-413 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN
AS SIERRA VISTA TORRENTE – PHASE 1 PROJECT, APPROVING
THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP
OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
2994
File #:
0400-04-09-1
CONTACT:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

7.14. Sierra Vista Torrente - Phase 2 Project - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Andrew Druck
and Development Services
Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-410 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA
TORRENTE – PHASE 2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS
OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The
Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
2991
File #:
0400-04-09-1
CONTACT:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

7.15. Sierra Vista Torrente - Phase 3 Project - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Andrew Druck
and Development Services
Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-408 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA
TORRENTE – PHASE 3 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
2989
File #:
0400-04-09-1
CONTACT:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

7.16. Creekview Westbrook Boulevard Segment 4 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-409 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CREEKVIEW
WESTBROOK BOULEVARD SEGMENT 4 PROJECT, APPROVING THE
"NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A

PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED
MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
2990
File #:
0400-04-09-1
CONTACT:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441
[email protected]

7.17. Creekview Blue Oaks Boulevard Segment 5 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-406 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CREEKVIEW
BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD SEGMENT 5 PROJECT, APPROVING THE
"NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A

CC #:
2986
File #:
0400-04-09-1
CONTACT:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441
[email protected]

Ordinances (for introduction and adoption - appropriation/urgency measures)

7.18. Longmeadow Parkside Community Facilities District No. 1 Bond Proceeds - Budget Adjustment
Memo from the Park Planning & Development Manager Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6738 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO
THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve a budget adjustment of $250,000 from the Longmeadow Parkside Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 refunding to the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Projects Fund and appropriating those funds to three new capital improvement projects within the Longmeadow Parkside CFD boundaries. The refunding of the Longmeadow Parkside CFD No. 1 bonds occurred in July 2023 and provided $250,000 of savings available for capital projects in the district. In reviewing the renovation needs for the Longmeadow area, a spending plan was developed to expend the funds over the next three years. Funding from the Longmeadow bond proceeds will be transferred from the Longmeadow Parkside Community Facilities District CFD No. 1 into the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Projects Fund to appropriate funds to three new capital projects. Any shortfalls to funding the above projects would be budgeted through the Longmeadow Community Facilities District No. 2 (Services District) sinking funds.

CC #:
2998
File #:
0206-03-01 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

7.19. Maidu Community Center Audiovisual Upgrades - Budget Adjustment Memo from Parks, Recreation & Libraries Superintendent Rob Nakamura and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6739 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 BUDGET AND

DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $100,000 to create a new project for audiovisual upgrades at the Maidu Community Center and Riley Meeting Rooms.

The Maidu
Community Center and Riley Meeting Rooms generate revenues through facility rentals hosting a variety of public and private events such as wedding receptions, parties, and business meetings. To make the facility more attractive and conducive to these events, now and into the future, staff has identified the need to upgrade audiovisual equipment in both facilities and have prioritized upgrading the equipment in both the main reception hall and Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 at the Maidu Community Center due to the age and functionality of the existing equipment. The funds for the upgrades was approved in the FY2023-24 budget and included in Parks, Recreation & Libraries operating budget. This budget adjustment will reduce that appropriation and move it into a project.

CC #:
3000
File #:
0203-10 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Rob Nakamura 916-774-5135 [email protected]

7.20. Utility Billing Payment Transactions - Budget Adjustment Memo from Utility Billing Operations Manager Andrea Blomquist and Electric Utility Director Dan Beans recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6736 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL
YEAR 2023-24 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $220,000 from the Electric Fund ($110,000), Water Operations Fund ($36,667), Wastewater Operations Fund ($36,667) and Waste Services Operations Fund ($36,666) to cover increased VISA transaction fees and higher paperless customer bill pay adoption volumes for utility services payments.

CC #:
2987
File #:
0800-03 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Andrea Blomquist 916-774-5317 [email protected]

7.21. Institute of Museum and Library Services - Grant Award and Budget Adjustment Memo from City Librarian Natasha Martin and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-411 ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM THE INSTITUTE OF
MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6737 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023- 24 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council accept a grant in the amount of $46,273 from the Institute of Museum and Library Services and approve a budget adjustment for $46,273 in the City's Grants Fund to create a new project for the expenditure of these funds for programs at the Maidu Museum & Historic Site. This budget adjustment will offset $37,957 of General Fund labor costs, increasing available resources in the General Fund.

CC #:
2992
File #:
0214 & 0716 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Natasha Martin 916-774-5234 [email protected]

Ordinances (for second reading and adoption)

7.22. Second Reading - Roseville Municipal Code Ordinances Regarding Parking Garage Restrictions
ORDINANCE NO. 6740 AMENDING SECTION 10.58.100, AND ADDING SECTIONS 10.58.110 AND 10.58.120 TO CHAPTER 10.58 OF TITLE 10

OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MUNICIPAL
PARKING FACILITIES, for second reading and adoption.

CC #:
3006
File #:
0323
CONTACT:

Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]
Troy Bergstrom 916-774-5010 [email protected]

Ceremonial Documents

7.23. Proclamation - National Cybersecurity Awareness Month October 2023 Proclaim October 2023 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month in Roseville and officially support the National Cybersecurity Awareness Month and the National Public Awareness Campaign “Stop. Think. Connect.™” and call upon all employees, residents and visitors of Roseville to become educated about cybersecurity and put that knowledge into practice to keep our connected community safe from cyber threats.

CC #:
3002
File #:
0102-06
CONTACT:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

8. ORDINANCES

8.1. California Board of State and Community Corrections - Grant Award and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Management Analyst Mark Peinado and Police Chief Troy Bergstrom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-404

ACCEPTING THE GRANT AWARD FROM THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6734 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2023-24 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council accept a Grant Award from the California Board of State and Community Corrections in the amount of $609,147 and authorize the City Manager to execute the required documents on behalf of the City. The purpose of the Organized Retail Theft Grant is to support local law enforcement agencies in preventing and responding to organized retail theft, motor vehicle or motor vehicle accessory theft, or cargo theft. Additionally, staff requests approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $647,960, including funding for the purchase and maintenance of a bait vehicle.

This budget adjustment will
have no net impact on the City's General Fund.

CC #:
2984
File #:
0214 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected]
Brandon Fernandez 916-774-5095 [email protected]

9. SPECIAL REQUESTS/REPORTS/PRESENTATION

9.1. Roseville Soccer Complex - Approval of Final Construction Documents Memo from Park Planning & Development Manager Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council approve the final construction documents for the Roseville Soccer Complex. In August 2022, the Council approved the master plan for the Roseville Soccer Complex which included 10 lighted artificial turf soccer fields, a universally accessible playground and support features such as off-street parking, restrooms, shade structures, concession/officials room, lighting and walkways.

At that time, a Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (SCH No. 2002082057). The approved delivery model is a design-assist process. This allows for the development of the plans in collaboration with the City, the Designer and the Contractor. Benefits of this approach provide for a method to control costs through a pre-construction phase for budget analysis and constructability review, minimizes change orders and allows for the phasing of construction work while other aspects of the project are being refined. This decreases delays and provides for an earlier start of construction. The grading plans for the Soccer Complex were approved by Council on June 7, 2023.

Grading operations began on June 12, 2023. The Engineering and Building permits have now been issued for the full project. This milestone allows the construction of the Soccer Complex to keep moving forward. Funding for the construction of the project was approved on March 15, 2023 with the award of the construction contract to Bothman Construction, Inc. The funding for this work includes allocations from the West Roseville Neighborhood Park Fund, the West Roseville Citywide Park Fund, the Strategic Improvement Fund, the Public Facilities Fund, the General Fund, the Federal Stimulus Reserve - American Rescue Plan Act Fund and repayment from Placer Valley Tourism for work performed under a separate Sports Complex effort. Maintenance for this facility will be funded by revenue generated by the facility and the Parks, Recreation & Libraries operations budget in the General Fund.

CC #:
2996
File #:
0704
CONTACT:

Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

10. COUNCIL REPORTS / PUBLIC COMMENTS

11. ADJOURNMENT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3008
File #:
0102-06
Title:

Proclamation - Domestic Violence Awareness Month October 2023 Contact:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 5.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Proclaim October 2023 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in Roseville and recognizes the vital role that all Californians can play in preventing and one day ending domestic violence.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Ceremonial documents meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Domestic Violence Awareness Month

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3007
File #:
0102-03
Title:

Minutes of Prior Meeting
Contact:

Melissa Lipp 916-774-5268 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Approve the minutes of the September 20, 2023 City Council Closed Session Meeting, the September 20, 2023 City Council Meeting, the October 4, 2023 City Council Closed Session Meeting, and the October 4, 2023 City Council/Housing Authority Meeting.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
September 20, 2023 Closed Session
September 20, 2023
October 4, 2023 Closed Session
October 4, 2023

AGENDA
October 4, 2023

CLOSED SESSION
5:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California
www.roseville.ca.us

CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER
B.

CLOSED SESSION ROLL CALL
C.

CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS
D.

CLOSED SESSION
D.1.

Conference with Labor Negotiators
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6
Chief Negotiators: Timothy Davis, Burke, Williams & Sorensen; Janie Carduff, Assistant Human Resources Director; Jonathan Levy, Senior Deputy City Attorney Agency designated representative: Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director Employee Organizations: Roseville Police Association; International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39; and Management/Confidential Employees, unrepresented employees CONTACT:

Stacey Peterson 916-774-5374 [email protected]

CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3001
File #:
0203-04
Title:

Office Supplies - Purchase Orders
Contact:

Becky Philipp 916-746-1110 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.2.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize the purchase of office supplies on an as-needed basis by City departments through ODP Business Solutions, LLC. utilizing Oakland County, Michigan's America Saves Program cooperative contract number no. 010418.

Staff also requests authority for
the City Manager or his designee to continue issuing purchase orders for two (2) additional two (2) year renewals without further contract Council approval, upon verification of the approved optional renewal years on the piggyback contract until that contract expires or until staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest, provided that the budget for office supplies is approved each fiscal year.

BACKGROUND
Office supplies are purchased citywide on an as-needed basis throughout the year. The City is piggybacking on the "America Saves Program" cooperative contract, a competitively bid contract initiated by the County of Oakland, Michigan, and awarded to ODP Business Solutions, LLC, formerly Office Depot Business Solutions.

The term of the initial America Save Program is through September 30, 2026 with the option to renew for two additional 2-year renewals through September 30, 2030.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated total for office supplies to be purchased for three years is $1,010,000. Funding is included in each department's budget. Estimated spending for future years will be contingent upon Council approval of budgets. Projected spending for the renewal years, are as follows: FY2026- 27 $262,500; FY2027-28 $385,000; FY2028-29 $420,000; FY2029-30 $462,000, FY2030-31 $115,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §20165 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The purchase of office supplies meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

Respectfully Submitted,
Becky Philipp, Buyer
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-417
RESOLUTION NO. 23-417

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES

WHEREAS, a purchase order for office supplies, between the City of Roseville and ODP Business Solutions, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is hereby approved; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the City Manager or his designee is additionally authorized to continue issuing purchase orders for two (2) additional two (2) year renewals without further contract Council approval, upon verification of the approved optional renewal years on the piggyback contract until that contract expires or until staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest, provided that the budget for office supplies is approved each fiscal year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
6735
File #:
0203-07 & 0201-01
Title:

Vehicle Purchase - Sole Source Purchase Order and Budget Adjustment Contact:

Joanna Cucchi 916-746-1609 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.3.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a sole source purchase order for Altec Industries Inc. for two 2027 International trucks with an Altec D3060E 60’ large distribution digger derrick, and adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment to the FY2023-24 Electric Fund budget to fund the purchase of these two electric line trucks.

BACKGROUND
The electric line truck is one of the largest vehicles in the Electric Department's fleet, and they are used by crews to house and transport materials, equipment, and include a bucket/boom for performing most jobs. There are currently five line trucks in the Electric Department's fleet, and this budget adjustment will initiate the replacement of two existing line trucks. Since there are long four to five-year lead times on these vehicles, staff is recommending beginning the process to order two new trucks now and retire two existing trucks upon their arrival.

The approval of this sole source and budget adjustment will enable Fleet Services to issue a purchase order to lock in pricing and order the two new line trucks. A sole source is needed to purchase the line trucks from Altec Industries Inc. as they are the sole manufacturer and distributor of Altec vehicles. The City owns and operates more than twenty Altec vehicles. Fleet Services standardized on this brand due to price, factory training of City mechanics, and equipment needs of Roseville Electric Utility. Purchasing Altec vehicles allows for electric crews to alternate vehicles without needing training on different vehicle types. During the production of Altec D3060E digger derricks, it is common to encounter unanticipated or changed conditions which necessitate additions or other modifications to the project and the contract. Due to the complexity of the build, the Fleet Manager requests authorization for the City Manager or his designee to approve change order requests in an amount not to exceed 1% of the contract price.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost estimate for two line trucks including options and sales tax is $1,187,622.66, with
authorization for staff to exceed the award amount by 1% or $11,876.23 as change order and vehicle preparation contingency
. The not-to-exceed amount for this purchase of two line trucks is $1,199,498.89. The approval of the ordinance will result in a budget adjustment that will increase the FY2023-24 budget authority and decrease the available resources in the Electric Fund balance by $1,199,498.89.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. This sole source purchase order and related ordinance approval for budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world.

Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services.

Respectfully Submitted,
Joanna Cucchi, Acting Electric Finance Administrator
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-405
Ordinance 6735
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 23-405

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER FOR TWO 2027 INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS WITH AN ALTEC D3060E 60’ LARGE DISTRIBUTION DIGGER DERRICK

WHEREAS, a sole source purchase order with Altec Industries, Inc. for two 2027 International trucks with an Altec D3060E 60’ large distribution digger derrick, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is hereby approved; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 6735

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-24, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the purchase of two 2027 International trucks with an Altec D3060E 60’ large distribution digger derrick.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this _ day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
ROsEflLLE REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT

CA LIFO RN IA
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Joanna Cucchi, Acting Electric Fi nance Manager PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Matt Nelson, Senior Electric Business Analyst FI SCAL YEAR:

COUNCIL DATE (if applicable):

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _E_le_ c_tr_ic_/F_ i_na_n_c _e-'--, _P_ri_ci_ng .... ,'--a_n_d_ A_n_a-'lyt'--ic _ s _______ ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 6001 6552 70001 1,199,499 Increase Capital Outlay - Vehicles TOTAL 1,199,499

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 1,199,499 !

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account I Center I Project Adjustment 6001 (1,199,499) Decrease Electric Fund Balance
TOTAL (1,199,499)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

FY2023-24
10/04/23
Roseville Electric Utility is purchasing for two (2) electric line trucks in the amount of$ 1,199,498.89. These vehicles will replace two existing electric line trucks. The total cost estimate including options and sales tax for both trucks is $1,187,622.66, with authorization for staff to exceed the award amount by 1 % or $11,876.23 as change order and vehicle preparation contingency. The not-to-exceed amount for this purchase of two line trucks is $1,199,498.89.
n-
n:::iniPI RQ::ins ("Pn 11 ?fl?"< , n•c:;? Pf)T\

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD/ DESIGNEE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/ DESIGNEE

POSTED BY
Revised: June 24, 2019
9/12/20233:36 PM
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE
BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

DATE

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3004
File #:
0203-02
Title:

Disposal and Auction Services – Contract Purchase Agreement Contact:

Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.4.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a contract purchase agreement (3003328) with J. J. Kane Associates, Inc. for disposal and auction services for surplus vehicles, equipment, parts, etc., and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff also requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to execute one additional one- year contract extension, utilizing the same Sourcewell contract without further Council approval, based on staff's determination that continuing this service is in the City's best interest.

BACKGROUND
The Fleet and Purchasing/Central Stores Divisions have a requirement to liquidate retired vehicles, equipment and other goods that are no longer in use. The City will piggyback on Sourcewell contract #110421-ALT. The term of the Sourcewell contract expires December 27, 2025, and may be extended one additional year.

FISCAL IMPACT
This is a revenue-generating agreement and the cost of the services are paid by the bidders. The revenue generated from the agreement is estimated to be approximately $500,000 annually. The portion of revenue generated by the Fleet Division will be returned to the Fleet Replacement Fund or the Electric Fund, and the portion of revenue generated by the Purchasing/Central Stores Division will be returned to the General Fund, or other funds as appropriate.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The disposal and auction of materials meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Tiffany Valdez, Buyer
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-419
Contract Purchase Agreement- JJ Kane
RESOLUTION NO. 23-419

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND J.J. KANE ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA J.J. KANE AUCTIONEERS,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement for disposal and auction services, by and between the City of Roseville and J.J. Kane Associates, Inc. dba J.J. Kane Auctioneers, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute one (1) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk
Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328
Supplier Details:

Company JJ Kane Associates Inc dba JJ Kane Auctioneers
Contact Mat Smith
Address 8668 Sparling Ln
Dixon, CA 95620
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact Tiffany Valdez
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1109
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328
Agreement 3003328
Agreement Date 03-OCT-2023
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 0.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier JJ Kane Associates Inc dba JJ Kane
Auctioneers
8668 Sparling Ln
Dixon, CA 95620
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
()
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials

SHALL PROVIDE DISPOSAL AND AUCTION SERVICES FOR SURPLUS VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, PARTS, ETC. ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED RATE SHEET UTILIZING SOURCEWELL CONTRACT #110421-ALT.

ALL WORK MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY AN AUTHORIZED MEMBER OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE'S FLEET SERVICES OR PURCHASING DIVISIONS.

PLEASE CONTACT SHANNON WIEST AT 916-746-1112 OR PETER BREVIK AT 916- 746-1754 FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 14801 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
01-Jul-2023 27-Dec-2025 Tiffany Valdez Phone 1-916-746-1109 Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office.

2 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328

Contract Terms and Conditions

1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of Contractor's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Contractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

2. Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Contractor is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Contractor shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Contractor acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Contractor has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement.

9. All fair employment practices must be adhered to. In addition, if the project referenced on this service agreement is a Public Works project, all prevailing wage laws must be complied with. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir. ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

10. Contractor agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage.
b. Form. Contractor shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney.
c. Additional Insureds. Contractor shall also provide a separate endorsement or 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328

section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Contractor. The additional insured coverage under the Contractor's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater.
d. Cancellation/Modification. Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor's work. Furthermore, Contractor shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City under this Agreement.

Additionally, Contractor shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all work performed by Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors. i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Contractor of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances, including but not limited to the City's storm water regulations, as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328

may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement. Refer to www.roseville. ca.us/stormwater for links to more information on the City's storm water regulations.

12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e- mail delivery of a ".pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original hereof.

14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

19. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.

20. Contractor certifies that Contractor, its employees, directors, officers, agents, subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency.

21. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.

22. CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONTRACTOR and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that: (a) CONTRACTOR is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONTRACTOR is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONTRACTOR has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONTRACTOR maintains a business location that 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328

is separate from CITY; (e) CONTRACTOR is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONTRACTOR actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONTRACTOR advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONTRACTOR provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONTRACTOR has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONTRACTOR set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONTRACTOR has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
___________ Corporation
___________ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
___________ Sole Proprietor
City Reserves the right to withold any payments to contractor in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.

General T&C
REV 3/2/21 JS

6 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942

Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT UNDER FORMAL BID LIMIT
General - Required Coverage:
● GeneralLiability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● AutomobileLiability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers'Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● AdditionalInsured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policiesmust be primary and non-contributory
● A30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Insurance Verification
By signing the agreement included with this document, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required above.

A copy of your insurance certificate is not required at this time. The City may request proof of insurance at any time.

Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202

7 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003328

Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 8 DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942 President
Assistant Secretary
Jeremy Walters
10/5/2023
10/6/2023
Dennis McIntyre

4.0%

4.0%
$100 Per Vehicle
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
Paid by seller
$100 Per Vehicle
$95 per hour
$95 per hour
$95 per hour
$95 per hour
$50 small/ $75 Large
No Charge
No Charge
DMV Back Fees (If any)
Duplicate Title (If title is lost and we have to replace) Standard Towing: Running Vehicles (6-8 Vehicles)
Vehicle Recall (Transport to local dealer to complete)
Exempt Plates: Processing ''E" Plates
Storage Fees
City of Roseville
Rate Sheet/ Sourcewell Contract #110421-ALT
Low Bed Trailer Service (Equip/Med to Large Trucks)
Surplus Personal Property (Miscellaneous)
Minor De-Logo, Decomission (no paint)
Standard Towing: Non-op units
Commission (Selling Fees)
Motor Vehicles and Off Road Vehicles (Sourcewell Agreement Pricing) Miscellaneous Property (Non-motor Off Road Vehicle) (Sourcewell Agreement Pricing) Non-running Vehicles (Sourcewell Agreement Pricing)
State of California Vehicle Safety Inspection
Transportation Charges and Other Services
Smog Service
CARB Administrative Fee
DocuSign Envelope ID: F0D8A332-866E-46C9-9C1F-916525E26942

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2997
File #:
0203-09
Title:

Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants Replacement Filtering Media – Sole Source Purchase Order
Contact:

Audrey Ficker 916-746-1865 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.5.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a sole source purchase order for Unison Solution Inc. to purchase replacement filtering media for the gas conditioning systems located at the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants. Additionally, staff requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to approve three (3) additional one (1) year purchase order renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
The Environmental Utilities Department has gas conditioning systems at the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants that use filtering media for the removal of hydrogen sulfide and siloxane as part of the biogas treatment. Conditioned biogas is used for fuel for generator systems at both plants and also for renewable natural gas (rCNG) that is used by the Environmental Utilities Refuse vehicles. These gas conditioning systems were designed and manufactured by Unison Solutions Inc. which require the media to be periodically replaced to maintain filter compliance. Sourcing the replacement filtering media from the equipment manufacturer guarantees the certified performance of the system as designed.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated annual cost is $220,000 for FY2023-24; $150,000 for FY2024-25; $270,000 for FY2025-26; and $160,000 for FY2026-27, with a not-to-exceed amount of $800,000 over four years. Funding will be provided from the Environmental Utilities Department’s annual budgets in the Wastewater Operations Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The purchase of the replacement filtering media for the gas conditioning systems meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Audrey Ficker, Administrative Technician
Richard D. Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-415
RESOLUTION NO. 23-415

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER FOR REPLACEMENT FILTERING

MEDIA FOR THE GAS CONDITIONING SYSTEMS LOCATED AT THE DRY CREEK

AND PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

WHEREAS, a sole source purchase order to purchase replacement filtering media for the Gas Conditioning Systems located at the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants, between the City of Roseville and Unison Solutions, Inc., has been reviewed by the Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is hereby approved and the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute three (3) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3002
File #:
0800-02
Title:

Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Recovery Project – Installment Sale Agreement Amendment
Contact:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.6.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the following amended agreement on behalf of the City:

The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) Installment Sale Agreement Amendment No. 3 for the low interest loan (1.3 percent) of $29,674,755 from the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Recovery Project.

BACKGROUND
The Energy Recovery Project (Project) added facilities at the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP) that beneficially utilize digester gas produced by the new treatment processes constructed as part of the PGWWTP Expansion Project. The Project included installation of microturbines that produce electrical power and heat to offset a portion of the PGWWTP’s power and natural gas demands, a receiving facility for High Strength Waste (pre- processed food waste and fats, oils, and grease), and a system for conditioning and upgrading the digester gas to produce renewable compressed natural gas (rCNG) that is sent to a new fueling station to power the City’s solid waste collection compressed natural gas vehicles.

The first amendment to the CWSRF Installation Sale Agreement was required to incorporate the final loan budget of $29,674,755 after the construction contract had been awarded by the City.

The second amendment was required to extend the time frame of the agreement because the construction of the Energy Recovery Project was not completed by the expected completion date in February 2022. The CWSRF Installment Sale Agreement Amendment No. 2 extended the construction date from February 10, 2022, to January 31, 2023. At the time of signing CWSRF Installment Sale Agreement Amendment No. 2, City staff anticipated that the Energy Recovery Project would not be complete until after January 2023; however, during a meeting held on June 22, 2022, the SWRCB requested that the City approve the second amendment with the date of January 31, 2023, and stated they will process a third amendment to extend the date again at a later date. CWSRF Installment Sale Agreement Amendment No. 2 was approved by the City on August 17, 2022, and the Water Board on August 30, 2022.

In February 2023, the SWRCB notified the City’s project manager that they would not be able to give the City an amendment for extension to the completion of construction date and subsequently the start and end of the loan repayment due to restrictions on the SWRCB for use of revenue bonds for payments to the City. However, the SWRCB stated that they could issue an amendment for extension of the final disbursement request date due to the fact that construction was not anticipated to be completed until July 2023. This CWSRF Installment Sale Agreement Amendment No. 3 extends the final disbursement request date from July 31, 2023 to January 31, 2024. This third amendment also adds text related to audit requirements (which the City is already complying with), and the SWRCB ability to terminate the agreement if the City does not comply with Executive Order N-6-22 on Russian Sanctions.

FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of the CWSRF Installment Sale Agreement Amendment No. 3 does not modify the loan amount, interest rate, or time period to repay the loans; however this amendment does allow additional time to submit disbursement requests through January 31, 2024 for additional SWRCB payments. Repayment of the loan is based on the amount of the loan used.

The Debt Service Agreement between the City and South Placer Wastewater Authority (SPWA) will allow all CWSRF loan repayment costs paid by the City to be fully reimbursed by the SPWA agency partners, resulting in no direct fiscal impact to the City. The CWSRF interest rate of 1.3 percent was the lowest available financing option evaluated by SPWA to fund these projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Implementation of the PGWWTP Energy Recovery Project was previously evaluated in the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Energy Recovery Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (SCH# 2016122040) (certified by the City Council on April 6, 2017), and the Addendum to the IS/MND (SCH# 2016122040) (certified by the City Council on November 7, 2018). The improvement plans included in the design-assist and construction agreement are consistent with the project evaluated in the certified Final IS/MND and the Addendum, and consequently no additional CEQA action is required for approval of this amended CWSRF agreement.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Principal Engineer
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-418
SRF Amendment Number 3
RESOLUTION NO. 23-418

APPROVING THE INSTALLMENT SALE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 3 FOR THE

PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXPANSION AND ENERGY

RECOVERY PROJECT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE

CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, the Installment Sale Agreement Amendment No. 3 for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Expansion and Energy Recovery Project, between the City of Roseville and the California State Water Resources Control Board, has been reviewed by the Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said amendment is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2993
File #:
0800-02
Title:

Landfill Water Quality and Gas Monitoring Services – Professional Services Agreement
Contact:

Michelle White 916-774-5774 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.7.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a professional services agreement with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. for Water Quality and Landfill Gas Monitoring and Reporting Services and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

The bid allows for three optional renewal years at one-year intervals. Staff requests authorization to continue utilizing the remaining optional renewal years of the bid contract without further Council approvals until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

BACKGROUND
The City owns and maintains a closed landfill located on a 115-acre site east of Galleria Boulevard at Berry Street, approximately 1 mile northeast of the center of Roseville. The landfill received municipal waste from the mid-1960s through January 1, 1980. In 1995, a final cover system was constructed in accordance with the Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan for Roseville Sanitary Landfill.

The closure of the Roseville Sanitary Landfill was completed in late 1995 in accordance with Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Order No.94-015 and the California Code of Regulations Article 5, Title 23. From these regulations came state-mandated post-closure requirements to establish a groundwater and landfill gas-monitoring program for the site. The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) issued revised WDRs and Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) on June 7, 2019, for this landfill.

Since 1994, the City has conducted groundwater monitoring at the landfill using a consulting firm to review data and report on the nature of any release from the landfill to the groundwater. The annual water quality report has established baseline water quality parameters and evaluates the effectiveness of the landfill closure. Each year the City submits a semi-annual and annual report for Landfill Gas and Water Quality Monitoring to the RWQCB for approval. Regulatory assistance is needed for these processes and other regulatory-related inspections and reports, such as winterization plans and erosion control evaluations. On August 2, 2023, the City issued Request for Proposals (RFP) #08-123 for Landfill Water Quality and Gas Monitoring Services based on state regulatory requirements assembled by Waste Services staff.

The City received four (4) responses to the Landfill Monitoring RFP by the August 30, 2023, deadline. A committee of staff members from the Waste Services and Technical Services divisions of Environmental Utilities conducted a comprehensive review of the proposals. As a result, staff selected Jacobs as the most qualified, technically diverse, and knowledgeable entity for the City’s landfill monitoring program. Jacobs met all the RFP requirements and will provide the City with timely submission of draft and final regulatory monitoring reports, a comprehensive historical understanding of Roseville's landfill gas and water issues, and has an excellent working relationship with regulatory representatives from the Department of Resource Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the RWQCB, and Placer County Environmental Health (Local Enforcement Agency). The Landfill Water Quality and Gas Monitoring aligns with the City Council’s goals of maintaining and delivering exceptional City services.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY2023-24 contract amount of $87,360 is budgeted in the Waste Services Operations Fund for the current fiscal year. Contract amounts for future fiscal years of the current agreement will be included in the respective budgets: FY2024-25, $213,840; FY2025-26 $256,440. Projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2026-27, $231,960; FY2027-28, $283,440; and FY2028-29, $250,920.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Michelle White, Environmental Utilities Compliance Administrator Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-412
PSA - Jacobs Engineering
RESOLUTION NO. 23-412

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for landfill water quality and gas monitoring services, by and between the City of Roseville and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute three (3) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3005
File #:
0320-01
Title:

Resolution Declaring Weeds and Rubbish a Public Nuisance Contact:

Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]

Michael Bradley 916-774-4710 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.8.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council approve a resolution declaring weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growth on property located at 1700 New Meadow Drive, Roseville, California 95747; APN 017-117-018, to be a public nuisance, and directing the Fire Chief or his designee to give notice of the approving of the resolution and setting the time and place for the required public hearing.

BACKGROUND
Chapter 9.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code governs abatement of weeds, dirt, rubbish, and rank growths on private property. Pursuant to RMC Section 9.20.020, the City Council may adopt a resolution declaring the existence of weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths on private property to be a public nuisance and authorizing city authorities to abate the nuisance if not addressed by the property owner. If such resolution is approved, the City Council then holds a public hearing at which time Council may hear objections from the property owner. If any objections are lodged at the public hearing, the Council considers such objections and determines whether to allow or overruled such objections. If the objections are overruled, City authorities may then move forward with abating the weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths declared to be a public nuisance and may charge the cost of the abatement to the property owner.

On August 5, 2023, a vegetation fire started at the end of New Meadow Drive and Foothills Boulevard. The fire was fueled, in part, by overgrown weeds and vegetation existing on the property located at 1700 New Meadow Drive, Roseville, California 95747; APN 017-117-018 (the “Property”). Such overgrown weeds and vegetation on the Property constitute weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growths as defined by RMC Section 9.20.010.

On approximately August 22, 2023, the Fire Department conducted an inspection of the Property, at which time it was determined that such weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growths continued to exist on the Property. On approximately August 31, 2023, written notice was sent to the owner of the Property informing the owner that such weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growths constitute a fire hazard and must be abated pursuant to Chapter 9.20 of the Municipal Code. The owner was further advised that if all such weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growths were not abated within thirty (30) days of the date of the letter, the City would initiate abatement proceedings, including but not limited to declaring a public nuisance, causing the weeds to be abated, and charging the owner for the full costs of the abatement. A copy of the letter sent to the Property owner is attached for reference. On approximately October 2, 2023, the Fire Department conducted a follow-up inspection of the Property, at which time it was determined that such weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growths continued to exist on the Property.

Because the weeds rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growths on the Property have not been abated and continue to present a fire hazard that endangers public health and safety, it is recommended that Council adopt a resolution declaring such weeds to be a public nuisance and setting the date and time for the required public hearing. If the resolution is approved, staff will provide the necessary notice to the property owner and will schedule a hearing for the November 1st

City Council
meeting to consider any objections.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed Resolution. If the City incurs costs to abate the nuisance, such costs may be charged to the property owner and constitute a special assessment and lien against the property.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute Section 21065 and CEQA State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) and Section 15378. The proposed Resolution meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F – Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Travis Cochran, Deputy City Attorney
Michael Bradley, Administrative Battalion Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-420
Public Notice
Letter to Property Owner
Pictures of Property
RESOLUTION NO. 23-420

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE DECLARING

THAT A PUBLIC NUISANCE EXISTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXISTENCE OF

WEEDS, DIRT, RUBBISH, AND/OR RANK GROWTHS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY

WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND DIRECTING THE FIRE CHIEF OR HIS

DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE

WHEREAS, the City Council, by virtue of Government Code Sections 39560 et seq. and Chapter 9.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code, is authorized to declare by Resolution as public nuisances and abate all weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths as described in Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.20.010, growing or remaining on any real property in the City; and

WHEREAS, under the provisions Government Code Section 39562, the Resolution must refer to the street locations by its common name and describe the property upon which the nuisance exists by giving its parcel number and address, according to the Official or City assessment map; and

WHEREAS, the hereinafter described real property in the City of Roseville is covered by weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths as described in Roseville Municipal Code Section

9.20.010, and said weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths constitute a public nuisance and are a hazard to the health, safety, and well-being on the citizens of the City of Roseville; and

WHEREAS, the particular description of the parcel on which said nuisances exists is as follows: 1700 New Meadow Drive, Roseville, California 95747; APN 017-117-018; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby finds, determines, and orders as follows:

1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct.

2. That a public nuisance is hereby deemed to exist and needs to be abated as a result of weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths as described in Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.20.010, growing or remaining on that parcel of land located at 1700 New Meadow Drive, Roseville, California 95747; APN 017-117-018.

3. The weeds, dirt, rubbish, or rank growths as described in Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.20.010 and declared to be a public nuisance herein are further declared to be seasonal and recurring public nuisances.

4. The owners of said real property who have objections to the proposed abatement of nuisances by the City of Roseville in the manner prescribed by the Government Code and the Roseville Municipal Code are hereby notified to attend the meeting the City Council to be held on November 1, 2023, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, at which time a hearing will be held and their objections will be heard and given due consideration.

5. Notice of the hearing shall be given by the Fire Chief or his designee pursuant to either subsection (A) or (B) of Section 9.020.050 of the Roseville Municipal Code.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

PUBLIC NOTICE

Public Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Roseville for the purpose of considering the following:

WEED ABATEMENT HEARING

On October 18, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 9.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code, the City Council of the City of Roseville passed a resolution declaring that all weeds as defined in Section 9.20.010(C)(1) of said chapter and all dirt, rubbish and/or rank growth, as defined in Section 9.20.010(C)(2), (3), (4) of said chapter, of any kind on private property, or in any street or alley abutting any property, constitute a public nuisance which must be abated by the destruction or removal thereof.

The property owner(s) of 1700 New Meadow Drive, Roseville, California 95747; APN 017- 117-018 shall, without delay, destroy or remove all such weeds, dirt, rubbish and/or rank growths from their property and half of the abutting street and alley, if any, between the lot lines, as extended, or such weeds, dirt, rubbish and/or rank growths will be destroyed or removed and such nuisance abated by the city authorities, in which case the cost of destruction or removal will be assessed upon the lots and lands from or on which, or abutting the streets and alleys from or on which, such nuisance was abated, and such costs will constitute a lien upon the lots or parcels until paid and will be collected on the next tax roll upon which municipal taxes are collected.

All property owners having objections to the proposed abatement of the nuisances are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the Council of the City of Roseville to be held on November 1, 2023, at 6:00 o’clock p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, where and when all objections will be heard and given due consideration.

Rick Bartee
Fire Chief of the City of Roseville

Dated: October ___, 2023

Phone (916) 774-5325 • Fax (916) 773-7348 • TDD (916) 774-5220 • [email protected] • www.roseville.ca.us/cityattorney

August 31, 2023

Via Certified & Regular U.S. Mail

Pig Farm Enterprises, L.P.
1700 New Meadow Dr.

Roseville, CA 95747

Stephen H. Thurtle
1840 Stone Canyon Dr.

Roseville, CA 95661

Re: 1700 New Meadow Drive; Notice to Abate

Dear Mr. Thurtle:

Please accept this letter as formal notice that certain weeds existing on the property located at 1700 New Meadow Drive, Roseville, California (the “Property”) are noxious and dangerous and create a fire hazard that endangers the public’s health and safety, and such weeds are a menace to nearby improved property. Pursuant to Chapter 9.20, you are required to abate this issue by removing all weeds located on the Property such that they no longer present a fire hazard, endanger the public’s health and safety, or represent a menace to nearby improved property. Such abatement must be completed within thirty (30) days from the date of this notice.

Please be further advised that if abatement of all weeds on the Property as set forth herein is not completed within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, the City of Roseville (“City”) will initiate abatement proceedings against you pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 9.20 and California Government Code Sections 39560 et seq. This will include, but is not limited to, declaring the weeds to be a public nuisance, causing the weeds to be abated, and charging you with the full costs of the abatement, which shall constitute a special assessment and lien against the Property.

If you have questions regarding the work necessary for the abatement you may contact me at (916) 774-5325, or you may contact Michael Bradley, Administrative Battalion Chief with the Roseville Fire Department, at 916-774-5806. However, as mentioned above, if you do not abate all weeds within thirty (30) days of the date of this notice, the City will move forward with abatement proceedings, and as the property owner, you will be responsible for the full cost of the abatement. The City also reserves all other legal rights and remedies for enforcement and for collecting its costs. Please note that if the City is required to abate the issue, we will do our best to minimize any inconvenience caused to you during the process. However, we cannot guarantee which days and/or times such abatement may occur.

City Attorney
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678
Pig Farm Enterprises, L.P.

Stephen H. Thurtle
August 31, 2023
Page | 2

We look forward to your prompt attention to this matter.

S i n c e r e l y ,

TRAVIS E. COCHRAN
Deputy City Attorney
City of Roseville

CC: Michael Bradley, Administrative Battalion Chief (via email only)

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2999
File #:
1006-01
Title:

Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Lease Agreement Contact:

Dan Allen 916-774-5741 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.9.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a lease agreement with Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) for approximately 10,000 square feet of existing building space, covered storage area, and outside paved area located at 100 Corporation Yard Road.

BACKGROUND
In July of 2002, the City Council approved a lease agreement with the SPCA to operate an animal shelter using approximately 10,000 square feet of existing City building space, a covered storage area, and an outside paved area all located at 100 Corporation Yard Road (APN 011-010-006- 000). The lease was extended via amendments on
June 18, 2003 and July 1, 2015.

The City and the SPCA desire to continue this lease arrangement, including the exact same building, storage, and outside space, and have negotiated terms for a new lease agreement.

Key Lease Agreement Terms

Landlord:

City of Roseville
Tenant:

Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) Lease Premises:

Approximately 10,000 square feet, gross leasable area
Start Date:

shall commence upon the Commencement Date and terminate at the end of sixty (60) months.

Term:

60 Months
Price:

Months

Monthly Rent

1-12 $1,915

13-24 $1,962

25-36 $2,011

37-48

$2,062

49-60 $2,113

Option to Extend. Tenant shall, provided the lease is in full force and effect and Tenant is not in default under any of the terms and conditions of the lease at the time of notification or commencement, have the option to extend this lease for one (1) separate and additional term of sixty (60) months (“Extension”) for any and all space under lease at the time said option is executed. Such Extension shall be made on the same terms and conditions set forth in the lease, except as modified by the terms, covenants, and conditions as set forth in subsections (a) – (c)

Optional Extension

Months Monthly Rent

61-72

$2,165

73-84

$2,219

85-96

$2,332

97-108

$2,390

109-120

$2,450

FISCAL IMPACT
Execution of the lease agreement would result in a positive fiscal impact to the General Fund of $22,980 in year 1 with an annual escalator, which would be applied towards the facility's maintenance and upkeep.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the leasing of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Dan Allen, Facility Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-416
Lease Agreement
Notice of Exemption
RESOLUTION NO. 23-416

APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF LEASE, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PLACER COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE

PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THEM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Lease Agreement and Memorandum of Lease, for a portion of the property located at 100 Corporation Yard Road, in the City of Roseville, CA, by and between the City of Roseville and Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, have been reviewed by the Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Lease Agreement and Memorandum of Lease are hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Lease Agreement

Project Location(s): 100 Corporation Yard Road, Roseville, CA 95678

Project Description: Public Works staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Lease Agreement with Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) for approximately 10,000 square feet of existing building space, covered storage area, and outside paved area located at 100 Corporation Yard Road. The facility was approved for use as an animal shelter in July 2002, and it has operated in that capacity since then. The lease was extended by amendments in 2003 and 2015. The proposed lease does not expand use or capacity.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Public Works Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 1 E xemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 1 consists of the …leasing…of existing public facilities , ….involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use... “

The project is the extension of a lease on City property that has been in place since 2002 and would not result in expansion of use. No environmentally sensitive resources are loc ated at or near the property; therefore the Class 1 exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Dan Allen, Public Works Department, 2005 Hilltop Circle, Roseville, CA 95747. (916) 774-5741.

Signature: Date: 10/3/2023
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator, City of
Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2988
File #:
0114
Title:

State Legislative Advocacy Services - Professional Services Agreement Contact:

Noelle Mattock 916-774-5504 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve an agreement with Renne Public Policy Group to provide state legislative and regulatory representation for the Environmental Utilities Department, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

BACKGROUND
The City has a long-standing professional services agreement with Joe A. Gonsalves and Son to provide professional lobbying services associated with state legislative and regulatory issues. The agreement spans more than 18 years and for many years, Joe A. Gonsalves and Son was able to meet the basic lobbying needs for the Environmental Utilities Department (EU). However, as the amount and complexity of state legislative and regulatory issues grew, especially starting around 2016 with the Water Efficiency Framework legislation (AB 668 and SB 606), staff recognized the need to add lobbying support from a firm that specialized in utility-specific issues.

In October of 2019, following a Request for Proposals (RFP), EU interviewed several lobbying firms and hired The Gualco Group to be subcontractors to Gonsalves and Sons for its unique issues. While the Advanced Clean Fleet Rule was adopted, EU has identified a number of upcoming regulatory and legislative issues that the department will need additional support on.

With the term of The Gualco Groups’ contract ending, EU recently initiated another RFP and received five proposals. After interviews were conducted for the top three proposers, Renne Public Policy Group was identified as the successful proposer given the firm's knowledge, skills, and capabilities to support EU’s key policy issues and interests.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement in the annual amount of $120,000 with the Renne Public Policy Group to represent the City of Roseville on EU’s specific policy issues and interests. The initial term of the agreement ends on December 31, 2026, but may be renewed in one (1) year increments for up to an additional four (4) years.

FISCAL IMPACT
The
FY2023-24 budget for state lobbying services in the Environmental Utilities funds totals
$84,000. The proposed professional services agreement is $120,000 annually. The $24,000 increase in costs in FY2023-24 for Renne Public Policy Group will be shared evenly between the Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services divisions. The total $24,000 increased cost will be absorbed within the existing budgets of the Water Operations Fund ($8,000), Wastewater Operations Fund ($8,000), and Waste Services Operations Fund ($8,000).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Noelle Mattock, Utility Government Relations Administrator Richard D. Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-407
Professional Services Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 23-407

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP, LLP DBA RENNE PUBLIC

POLICY GROUP, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste State Advocacy Services, by and between the City of Roseville and Renne Public Law Group, LLP dba Renne Public Policy Group, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute up to four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater
and Solid Waste State Advocacy Services

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Renne Public Law Group, LLP, dba Renne Public Policy Group, a California limited liability partnership (“CONSULTANT”); and

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY desires professional services consisting of water, wastewater, recycled water, stormwater and solid waste state advocacy services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a proposal in response to RFP No. 08-119 dated July 31, 2023, which describes the scope of work to be performed by CONSULTANT, the budget for the work, and the schedule for performance of the work; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide such professional services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution and expire on December 31, 2026. The City Manager may, in his or her discretion, elect to extend the Agreement in one (1) year increments for up to an additional four (4) years by giving CONSULTANT thirty (30) days advance written notice of each optional one (1) year renewal.

Such extensions shall be memorialized by a written amendment to this Agreement.

3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a flat fee retainer basis in accordance with the budget estimate as described in EXHIBIT “A.” Total compensation shall not exceed three hundred sixty thousand dollars ($360,000) for the initial term. Total compensation for each optional renewal year of this Agreement shall not exceed one hundred twenty thousand dollars ($120,000). Total compensation for the initial term and all optional renewal years shall not exceed eight hundred forty-thousand dollars ($840,000). Adjustment to the total compensation per year shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, subject to approval by the City Council.

CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). CITY shall pay the invoice within thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

4. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole 3 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.

CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY

Workers’ Compensation Statutory

Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate

Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit

Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate

a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a 4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. 5 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
6 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

6. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder, and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

7. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

8. Prevailing Wages. When applicable, for purposes of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall comply with all applicable prevailing wage laws, e.g., but not limited to, California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. In accordance with said Section 1775, CONSULTANT shall forfeit as a penalty to the City two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any work done on-site under the 7 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subcontractor in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Labor Code Sections 1770 to 1780, inclusive. In addition to said penalty and pursuant to said Section 1775, the difference between such stipulated prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage shall be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or the applicable subcontractor.

Pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1773, the contracting department has identified the source, stated below, of the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the site to be done, for straight time, overtime, and holiday work. The holiday wage rate listed shall be applicable to all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining agreement of the particular craft, classification or type of worker concerned. These wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

9. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.
8 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

10. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

11. Governing Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and its EXHIBITS, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. In the event of any conflict between any of the EXHIBITS, the provisions of the first in order of attachment shall govern.

12. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

13. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, 9 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on- call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

14. Representations and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

15. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible material (“Material”) created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, 10 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

In the event that CONSULTANT uses, employs, designates, or retains any person or entity who is not an employee of CONSULTANT, to perform any work required of it pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall require said person or entity to execute an agreement containing the preceding paragraph.

17. Termination of Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice. In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any MATERIAL, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

18. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
11 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

19. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

20. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

21. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT

Noelle Mattock Alyssa Silhi
Utility Government Relations Administrator Director of Government Affairs 2005 Hilltop Circle 1127 L Street, Suite 300
Roseville, CA 95747 Sacramento, CA 95814

Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

22. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

(SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)

12 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a municipal RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP, LLP, corporation DBA RENNE PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, a
California limited liability partnership

BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________ City Manager
and

ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________

BY: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney

APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

RICHARD PLECKER
Environmental Utilities Director

Managing Partner

13 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D018\P005\00081630.DOCX;09/21/2023]

EXHIBIT “A”

17 The City of Roseville Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste Stat e Advocacy Services

TAB D: UNDERSTANDING OF SERVICES REQUESTED

Understanding of Scope of Services
The City of Roseville is seeking qualified and talented representation at the state level to serve as its eyes, ears, and voice to successfully advocate on behalf of the Environmental Utilities Department’s needs. The team selected will be an integral part of the City’s overall advocacy efforts and an important element of the Department’s work. The scope of services requested is robust and requires legislative, regulatory, and administrative advocacy on the full spectrum of legislative and regulatory proposals that could impact the City’s utility services. In addition, the scope of services requires exceptional communication between the state advocacy team and the Department and from the advocates to lawmakers and stakeholders. Our understanding of the services requested, general approach, and proposed methodologies and strategies needed to achieve them is further demonstrated in detail in TAB E: Program Plan .

General Approach
At RPPG, we strive to be a necessity for our clients, not a luxury. This means finding ways to show true return on investment. However, the “value” of the services we provide depends on the individual needs of the client.

Whether the need is advancing a beneficial state policy, stopping a piece of detrimental legislation, advocating for increased General Fund or grant dollars, or providing detailed policy and political information that informs decision-making, we pride ourselves on our proven ability to dig into our client’s specific issues and create a customized advocacy strategy that fits their individual needs.

Our cumulative decades of experience working on behalf of public agencies provides us substantive perspective and a unique lens with which to see the complex and varie d layers of the state legislative and regulatory issues that impact water, wastewater, recycled water , solid waste, and stormwater programs .

As previously mentioned, we provide “wraparound service,” which means we would lean on our experience working with similarly situated agencies, direction from the Department’s project manager and technical experts, and the City’s comprehensive legislative policy platform to create a tailored legislative strategy for the Department that specific ally addresses your needs, goals, challenges, opportunities, and priorities.

Major Challenges/Items of Special Consideration
The City values local control and the Department’s ability to conduct operations in a way that maximizes value to the community, protects infrastructure investments, and plans for sustainable and reliable water resources and water quality for Roseville residents. The state continues to seek solutions on a variety of issues, including water allocation, water quality standards, water conservation, greenhouse gas reduction, and sustainable solid waste disposal practices . Often, these proposals diminish the role of local agencies in the decision -making process and reduce local control. Protecting the Department’s interests is an area where relationships and joining forces with statewide groups and entities with similar interests will be paramount to success. As the City has a minority party state delegation, it will be important to have both the buy -in of your elected representatives and legislative leaders on key policy committees and administrative officials, when appropriate, in order to communicate the innovative solutions that the City’s utilities are engaged in and to advance your policy priorities.

Furthermore, the state often oversaturates compliance and reporting requirements by creating new mechanisms and programs that impose an additional burden on local agencies to provide data or that complicate existing regulatory processes, rather than streamlin ing them. It will be important for the state

18 The City of Roseville Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste Stat e Advocacy Services

advocacy team to work with the Department to monitor proposals that alter existing regulations and to work to streamline them where appropriate. Examples of such regulations include the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), which requires local agencies to develop plans to manage groundwater resources sustainably; the Clean Water Act (CWA), which regulates the discharge of pollutants into surface waters ; the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), which regulates the quality of drinking water; and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which regulates the disposal of solid waste.

With the City’s circular economy , green infrastructure projects , stream restoration projects , and its commitment to using renewable energy to power its operations and reduce its reliance on fossil fuels , the Department has many programs and priorities that dovetail with state priorities. It will be important for the chosen state advocacy team to relentlessly message those solutions to decision -makers, so that statewide solutions build in the flexibility required for your local investments and programs to remain in compliance with statutes and regulations.

Unique Approaches and Strengths
We believe our client service model is unique, particularly when compared with the way most contract governmental affairs firms conduct business. The RPPG brand is founded on delivering superior work product quality and a “white glove” service experience. Our goal is to make you feel like our only client, every time. We are enthusiastic, passionate local government advocates who deliver tenacious representation and consistent, tailored, and timely communication. You will always know how your advocates are using your voice and the state of play in the Capitol.

Each principal has a proven record of assimilating and integrating new technical information at top spe ed into our lexicon, knowledge base, and strategic approach to achieve successful outcomes. This is a strength of premium importance in an environment of state leaders’ rapidly shifting policy priorities. Working on behalf of local government associations and within the Capitol required each of us to swiftly learn how to become authoritative voices on complex, technical issues and taught us how to expediently conduct research, lean on technical experts, and utilize our professional relationships to get the job done. As a result, we have the knowledge and understanding of legislative and regulatory issues that the Department’s state advocacy team would be required to engage upon, wide-ranging networks within the Capitol and Administration, and the ability to quickly learn new issues.

RPPG is a team of seasoned advocates who are experts in state legislative and regulatory processes with a demonstrated history of producing results for similar public agencies. The Department comprises high-level professional and technical experts in their fields, and RPPG would not presume to outmatch your working knowledge of the complexities of your own issues, because you best know your needs. RPPG w ill collaborate with your staff on the Department’s priorities and specific needs and pair that with our expertise in state government policies and procedures to ensure that your voice is represented in the state Capitol — and that the results accomplish your goals for real- world application. RPPG’s team of professionals is nimble, mobile, and tactical and will strategically guide you through the policy process.

We believe our mobility on the issues relevant to the Department gives us a competitive advantage and would be an asset to the City. We have very minimal potential exposure to conflicts of interest or competing priorities for the Department with our current client base, and our ability to become specialists on the nuances of the City’s Environmental Utilities Department policy priorities equals or exceeds that of other firms whose client portfolios are saturated with public utilities or the agencies that represent them.

19 The City of Roseville Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste Stat e Advocacy Services

TAB E: PROGRAM PLAN
The RPPG Strategic Approach
The art of advancing critical needs on one front while defending local decision -making on another requires an exceptional in -depth understanding of the client’s needs, accompanied by strong personal relationships with key decision -makers. While legislative and regulatory advocacy has many facets , our overarching advocacy strategy and approach is grounded in these principles:

Proactive Engagement: Buil ding upon a solid foundation of your goals and key messaging, RPPG will continually engage early and often with key decision -makers and like -minded stakeholders throughout the legislative process , during the interim recesses, and between legislative sessions . This i ncludes consistent communication with your legislative delegation on items of concern and opportunity , as well as proactive engagement with relevant committee chairs, key legislative leaders, consultants, Administration officials, and outside advocacy organizations to identify opportunities for a blended advocacy strategy that both enhances and protects your interests .

Creative Solutions: The success of advancing legislative or fiscal proposals, negotiating amendments, and mounting a coordinated public aff airs campaign when necessary is often determined by the approach taken to achieve results. While there are some general principles that every advocacy firm should implement for their clients, we shy away from one -size-fits-all solution s and instead assess the full landscape for your specific circumstances and needs . This enables us to provide the proper guidance, messaging, and on- the-ground maneuvering that pushes beyond the cookie -cutter solutions frequently provided in California poli tics.

Proactive Engagement
Creative Solutions
The Ability to Pivot Throughout the Political Process
A Tenacious Work Ethic and Passion for Local Government Effective Comm unication

20 The City of Roseville Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste Stat e Advocacy Services

The Ability to Pivot Throughout the Political Process : We have curated a team of strategic operatives, each of whom ha s a depth of experience in vari ous policy arenas , from former high -ranking Capitol staff and committee consultants to former electe d officials and legislative advocates for the League of California Cities and California Special Districts Association . Our broad professional network is collectively leveraged to accomplish our clients’ objectives. Due to our rich and diverse political an d professional backgrounds, we have worked on virtually every single issue affecting local jurisdictions at some point in time. We are nimble professionals with the ability to get up to speed quickly on client -specific policy issues and to engage effectively with stakeholders and lawmakers despite frequent extreme ly short lead times.

When one door closes, we are able to find another to open so that we can continue to advance your priorities. We lean into our signature work ethic, determination, agility , and solid policy background to stay one step ahead of the opposition, ensuring that your needs and concerns are heard, seen, and successfully advanced within the legislative process.

A Tenacious Work Ethic and Passion for Local Gov ernment: Our motto is , “We do the work, and we take nothing for granted.” Th at may sound overly simplistic, but in our experience, many firms simply rely on relationships , provide “copy and paste ” deliverables, or push work products to less experienced staff to advance their clients’ interests. While relationships are critical, and we rely upon and leverage them on our clients’ behalf, advocacy is a field that rewards persistence , experience, and hard work. We pride ourselves on our energy and work ethic. Each princip al at RPPG is doing the work as specified in the client contract ; we go above and beyond to deliver a customized product based on your individual needs. Our principal staff are local government e xperts – each comes from local government or has extensive experience successfully engaging in the myriad policies that impact public agencies . We work to intimately understand the challenges facing the City and Department staff and deeply value the critical role you play in your community . This enables us to help develop your distinctive voice, share your story, and advance your goals more efficiently .

Effective Communication: At RPPG, we understand you do not merely want to have a voice in Sacramento, but also require that voice to communicate in a manner authentic to your agency and to accurately reflect your priorities and values. We work tremendously hard for our clients because each client who partners with RPPG has placed their trust in us –– not just to represent their interests in the state Capitol , but also to be a trusted messenger of their brand and story. In a ddition, we provide you with the tools to communicate directly with your Council , community members , and other regional partners and stakeholders about what the City is doing with that voice in Sacramento. We achieve this through frequent client contact and consistent accountability, including monthly detailed reports of our activities on your behalf, monthly legislative memos and priority bill lists , and memos detailing significant benchmarks throughout the year , such as Budget Act updates and legislative deadlines , so that your staff , City leaders, and community members understand the value of invest ing in a robust advocacy program.

Methodologies
We propose to meet the Department objectives detailed in the RFP in the following ways. • State Legislative Engagement, Tracking, and Advocacy. RPPG will track, review, and analyze any introduced and amended legislation and advocate on legislation and any State Budget issues impacting the Department. We will assist in evaluating proposed legislation and identifying priorities based upon the potential impact on the Department, and we will consult on and develop strategic documents that include draft policy and regulatory positions, budgetary letters, a priority legislative tracking matrix customized according to your specifications, budget analysis , and background papers to ensure that

21 The City of Roseville Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste Stat e Advocacy Services

you are kept informed of the latest developments and that your voice is heard by policymakers and stakeholders. In addition, RPPG will assist in the development, drafting, and sponsorship of state legislation and amendments needed to advance your goals and priorities.

• Participate and Advise in Annual Legislative Strategic Planning. RPPG understands the important role that establishing a proactive strategy plays in your overall success. Through a series of “deep dive” meetings, RPPG will work with Department staff and leadership to discuss and identify who m to include internally in discussions to determine goals, objec tives, opportunities, and challenges related to the City ’s priorities. We will use t his information to develop an annual and multi -year legislative strategic plan that reflects your unique organizational needs.

• Explore Potential Funding Opportunities. RPPG closely monitors the State Budget process and bond proposals that move through the state Legislature, including the multiple climate bond proposals currently moving through the legislative process . We will work with Department staff to identify buckets of funding of interest in initiative packages, in addition to finding and advocat ing for General Fund and grant opportunities , as directed .

• Representation. RPPG will represent the Department at policy-related meetings, conferences, events, regulatory proceedings, legislative hearings, and other appropriate venues to deliver comments and testimony and provide you with a consistent presence in the state Capitol.

• Frequent, Reliable Communication. At RPPG, we strive to ensure that our clients are fully informed.

Our team will provide regular written and verbal communications and updates to keep the Department up to date on our advocacy efforts, individual tasks, and timeline for meeting mileston es. Regular communication between the Department and RPPG team will also ensure that we are responsive to the direction of your Council, Directors, and staff throughout the entire State Budget and legislative processes. This will include monthly written policy status and activity reports, along with more in-depth reports and recaps during each major milestone throughout the legislative year (e.g., every budget milestone, bill introduction deadline, house of origin deadline, summer recess, and end of session). In addition, we will supplement these reports with a monthly check -in via Zoom with Department staff during the legislative session and with an updated legislative matrix. During these meetings, we will review legislation and brief you on the latest issues and developments.

• Relationship Building. By 2024, the entire Legislature will have fully turned over since 2012. This provides an opportunity for the Department to establish new relationships both inside and outside its legislative delegation. RPPG will build on your presence in Sacramento to assist in further developing robust relationships with legislative leaders and the Administration, as well as key state agencies and staff. RPPG will continue to foster its relationships within your state legislative delegation, the Governor’s Office, California Natural Resources Agency, C alifornia Air Resources Board, CalRecycle, State Water Resources Control Board, Department of Water Resources , and other departments and agencies with funding programs, regulations, or initiatives that may intersect with your identified needs and priorities. Our firm will make meeting recommendations, schedule arrangements, and strategize in advance on messaging. This approach ensures that we have laid the groundwork for the Department’s bill proposals year over year. As a part of our onboarding process, we propose

22 The City of Roseville Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste Stat e Advocacy Services

scheduling one -on-one meetings with designated staff and Council to inventory their individual political relationships with state legislative and Administration officials. Having a clear understanding of the strengths of current relationships allows your advocacy team to better develop bill- and budget- specific strategies. This is vital to success at the critical moment when a vote on a controversial bill takes place.

• Educational Tour. Guided by your legislative priorities, RPPG is prepared to conduct an educational tour in the Capitol to drive awareness on the issues of greatest importance to the Department. This will ensure that the appropriate communication channels with legislative staff and legislators remain open throughout the 2024-2025 legislative session and beyond.

• Targeted Engagement with Statewide Local Government Association and Local Agency Partners.

RPPG has strong contacts and proven working relationships with the League of California Cities, California Contract Cities Association, California Special Districts Association, California Municipal Utilities Association, Association of California Water Agencies, California Association of Sanitation Agencies, WaterReUse Association, Regional Water Authority, Solid Waste Association of North America – California Chapters, California Product Stewardship Council, California State Association of Counties, Rural Counties Representatives of California, Urban Counties of Califo rnia, and other statewide advocacy organizations whose interests overlap those of the Department . These relationships will ensure that we can effectively communicate your policy positions to RPPG’s partners in these associations and agencies — and, when ap propriate, incorporate a blended strategy — to achieve success on all matters of import to the Department.

• Other Stakeholder Engagement. RPPG will secure the support of potential stakeholders, including identifying, prioritizing, leading outreach efforts to relevant stakeholders , and building and working with related coalitions to advance your budget and legislative priorities. We will utilize our close working relationships to help meet your legislative goals and advance your interests.

• FPPC. RPPG will file all required forms on behalf of the City , including but not limited to forms 602 (annual Lobbying Firm Activity Authorization) and 635 (Report of Lobbyist Employer).

Staff Assigned to the Proposed Project
The RPPG staff proposed to act as the City of Roseville Environmental Utilit ies Department’s state advocacy team and to conduct all activities as specified in the RPF and this proposal are outlined in Tab A: Firm’s
Qualifications and detailed in Tab C: Qualifications of Team.

23 The City of Roseville Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, Stormwater and Solid Waste Stat e Advocacy Services

TAB F: COST PROPOSAL
RPPG proposes a flat monthly retainer fee for all services outlined rather than monthly compensation on a time-and-expense basis, which is the standard method of compensation for services rendered for state advocacy services . This proposed pricing includes all work performed by RPPG primary staff, advisors, and operational/administrative support as detailed in this proposal and is inclusive of all costs associated with the quarterly filings required by the Fair Political Practices Commission. Staff time that each designated member of the project team will devote to this contract is as specified in Figure 1 , Team Organizational Chart, under Tab C: Qualifications of Team .

Services Provided Monthly Fee Annual Not T o Exceed
State Advocacy Services * $10,00.00 per month $120,000 annually

*This does not include travel -related expenses outside the Sacramento Metropolitan Region and is not inclusive of comprehensive grant services, which are available for additional fee to be agreed upon as determined .

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2983
File #:
0103-34-02
Title:
2023 Citizens' Benefit Fund Policy Manual Updates
Contact:

Tobi Thomas 916-746-1368 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving recommended revisions to the Citizens' Benefit Fund Policy Manual, clarifying language in two sections - bid requirements and site visits, as proposed by the Grants Advisory Commission (GAC).

BACKGROUND
Each year, the Grants Advisory Commission (GAC) reviews the past year's grant funding cycle documents and updates them, as needed, for the upcoming funding cycle. During the last cycle, the Commission discussed several policies to clarify for the upcoming 2024/2025 funding cycle.

At the September 12, 2023 GAC meeting, the Commission met to discuss the proposed revisions to the cycle documents and recommended the review and approval of updates to the Citizens' Benefit Fund Policy Manual.

Specifically, the GAC revised two policies. The bid requirements for capital expenditures section better defines capital items and updates the minimum and maximum bid requirements. The site visit section clarifies when and where the GAC Commissioners are allowed to visit prospective non-profit applicants. Please refer to Attachment 1 for a copy of the 2023 Grants Advisory Commission Policy Manual.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the 2023 GAC Policy Manual revisions has no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The revision of program documents does not constitute a project and therefore, has no potential for a significant environmental effect, and is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Tobi Thomas, Management Analyst
Dion Louthan, Assistant City Manager

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-403
Redline CBF Policy Manual Updates
RESOLUTION NO. 23-403

APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE CITIZENS’ BENEFIT FUND POLICY MANUAL

WHEREAS, the Grants Advisory Commission reviews policies and procedures annually in an effort to improve efficiencies and streamline processes; and

WHEREAS, this year, staff recommends the following policy revisions to the Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual for the upcoming 2024/2025 funding cycle:

Bid Requirements for Capital Expenditures
 Defines capital items and updates the minimum and maximum bid requirements.

Site Visits
 Clarifies when and where the Grants Advisory Commissioners are allowed to visit prospective non-profit applicants.

WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed staff recommendations; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said recommendations are hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES – COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES – COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

City of Roseville
Citizens’ Benefit Fund
Policy Manual

adopted by the
Roseville Grants Advisory Commission

September 12, 2000
amended
November 12, 2002
December 3, 2003
November 9, 2004
November 8, 2005
November 18, 2008
December 19, 2012
October 8, 2013
February 17, 2016
June 21, 2017
November 18, 2020
October 18, 2023

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 1 suggested amendments 2023 Policy Manual
Table of Contents

Purpose …………………………………………………………………………………………..

2 Chronology of Citizens’ Benefit Fund.……………………………………………………… 3 Adopted Policies of the Grants Advisory Commission & Roseville City Council….. 6 Criteria for Grant Applicants……………………………………………………………… 7 Original Criteria and Application Submittal Requirements……………………….….. 7 Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance…………………………………………. 7 Bids for Capital Items………………..……………………………………………... …. 7 Funding for Religious or Sectarian Activities Prohibited………………………....…. 8 Grant recipients located in Roseville …………………………………………….…… 8 Ownership or Long-term Lease of Property Improved with Grant Funds…………. 8 Compliance with California Prevailing Wage Law
– SB 975/AB 2690…………….. 8
Tax Status………………………………………………………………………………... 9
Process-Related Policies…………………………………………………………….……. 10 Annual Review ……………………………………………………………………………
Recipient Reporting ……………………………………………………………………...
10 10
Appeal of Grant Advisory Commission Decision …………………………………….. 10 Funds Expended within One Year …………………………………………………….. 10 Line Item Review.………………………………………………………………………… 10

Applicant Workshop……………………………………………………………………… 11
Process to Amend or Extend Timeframe of Approved Grants……………...………. 11 Site Visits………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

Application Review and Process…………………….…………………………………. 12 Funding Policies……………………………………………………………………….…… 13
City Projects..………………………………………………………………………….….. 13
Categories and Target Maximum Amount……………………………..….…………... 13 Funding Priorities……………………….………………………………………………... 13
Matching Funds Not Required…………………………………………………………... 14 Multiple Applications from One Agency………………………………………………... 14 Multiple Year Grants …………………………………………………………………….. 14
Perpetual Funding ……………………………………………………………………….. 15
Fund Investing & Funding Source………………………………………………………. 15 Grant requests from Schools …………………… ……………………………………… 15 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………. 16
A: Ordinance 3388
B: Application Guidelines
C: Application
D: Finance Department Audit Form (Request for Funds and Report of Expenditures) – form retired after 2007/08 funding cycle
E: Grant Agreement
F: Request for Amendment to Grant Application
G: Memorandum from Deputy City Attorney Bob Schmitt to Assistant to the City Manager Julia Burrows dated September 20, 2002 regarding SB 975 and the Citizens’ Benefit Fund
H: Memorandum from Associate City Attorney Michele Sheidenberger dated August 31, 2004 regarding AB 2690 and the Citizens’ Benefit Fund
I: 2013 Historical Assessment of the Roseville Grant Program J: Implementation Strategies for 2019/20 Kone’ Consulting’s Community Needs Assessment (CNA)
Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 2 suggested amendments 2023 City of Roseville
Citizens’ Benefit Fund
Policy Manual

Purpose

The purpose of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual is to:

 Document the policy decisions of the Grants Advisory Commission and Roseville City Council regarding the Citizens’ Benefit Fund by year and by topic;

 Serve as a reference for new Grants Advisory Commissioners and Roseville City Councilmembers as to program implementation; and

 Answer questions from the public regarding the grants process, including questions from potential grant applicants, and current grant recipients.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 3 suggested amendments 2023

Chronology of Citizens’ Benefit Fund

Jun 1, 1994 Grants Advisory Commission established by Ordinance 2774.

Hospital Proceeds Fund Established by Ordinance number 2788. Chapter

4.06 is added to the Roseville Municipal Code to establish the Hospital Proceeds Fund.

Jul 12, 1994 City Council approves criteria and first grant application.

Jan 25, 1995 Joint City Council/Grants Advisory Commission Workshop to discuss Grant application process, including estimated timeframe for processing grant applications and restricting grant funds to benefit Roseville residents only for specific project, rather than general funding; no funding for administrative costs, audit procedures following Grant awards; procedures to notice Commission meetings and interviews with applicants.

Sep 10, 1997 Joint City Council/Grants Advisory Commission Workshop to discuss grant consideration process, appeal opportunities, award process, stewardship of funds, application form changes, multiple year funding, auditing, collaboration of organizations, grant requests for capital projects, city projects or from agencies outside the city.

Dec 16, 1998 City Council approves formal process to consider modifications to approved grants and adoption of marketing program for the Citizens’ Benefit Fund.

Aug 18, 1999 Ordinance 3388 adopted by the Roseville City Council amending Chapter

4.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code. Amendments include:

1. Name change from Hospital Proceeds Fund to Citizens’ Benefit Fund to reflect opportunity for donations to the fund from the community rather than limited principal amount from sale of municipal hospital.

2. Amendment to Section 4.04.040, Expenditures of Money, to indicate unappropriated amounts may be carried forward to subsequent fiscal years, or at the discretion of the City, may be added to the principal.

Jul 10, 1999 Joint City Council/Grants Advisory Commission Workshop to discuss policies related to requirement for matching funds, grant funding for leased vs. owned property, perpetual funding, monitoring/annual reports, and Ad Hoc Committee.

Nov 3, 1999 City Council adopts policies related to issues from joint Commission/Council workshop.

Dec 3, 2003 City Council approves Grants Advisory Commission recommendations for funding criteria and process improvements following three workshops by the Commission and the first REACH/Enron funding cycle.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 4 suggested amendments 2023 Dec 15, 2004 City Council approved Grants Advisory Commission recommendations for revisions as a result of AB 2690 – repealing the requirement that volunteers be paid prevailing wages and eliminating the mandatory workshop.

December 19, 2012 The City Council approved a financial report on the Citizens’ Benefit Fund (CBF) and a work plan for a comprehensive grants policy review.

May 29, 2014 GIM to the City Council regarding completion of phase 1 in the Comprehensive Grants Review Process – Historical Assessment Report of the Roseville Grants program.

April 20, 2015 Joint City Council/Grants Advisory Commission Workshop to discuss policies relating to administration of the Fund and Fund investment and program options.

December 16, 2015 City Council considered and reaffirmed:

1. Retention of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund (CBF) with the City to be invested and administered by the City.

2. Retention of the Grants Program and Commission with administration by the City.

3. Revision of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund (CBF) Policy Manual and Guidelines, as follows:
a) Accept investment strategy revisions expanding strategy consistent with Government Codes.
b) Reaffirm smoothing strategy to hold back proceeds in excess of $500K and establish new policy for annually utilizing proceeds in excess of $500K for smoothing or special projects or community benefits.
c) Reaffirm the nine (9) funding program categories.
d) Retain limits on school districts and schools, as approved by the Grants Commission.
e) Continue policy that the City Manager, or his designee, approve grants submitted for City requests.
f) Confirm no giving priorities with each funding request to be evaluated on its own merits.
g) Establish a policy for an annual needs assessment for Council to consider and establish priorities for the coming funding cycle.

June 17, 2017 City Council approved revisions to Grants Policy Documents to streamline program procedures relating to administration of Grants program.

Additionally, Grants have been focused and aligned to solely private schools and non-profits entities.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 5 suggested amendments 2023 November 18, 2020. City Council approved new Implementation Strategies provided by the Grants Advisory Commission based on findings from the Community Needs Assessment by Kone Consulting. Changes include:

1.) Service Categories

2.) Funding priorities

3.) Collaboration

4.) Promoting Outcomes

5.) Measuring Success

6.) Scoring Methodologies
October 18, 2023 City Council to approve revisions to clarify policies relating to bid requirements and site visits by the Grants Commissioners.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 6 suggested amendments 2023

Adopted Policies of the Grants Advisory Commission and Roseville City Council 1994-2023

Criteria for Grant Applicants

Original Criteria and Application Submittal Requirements (6/94, 2/16) Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance (1/99)
Bids Required for Capital Items Expenditures to be Included (1/96, 10/99) suggested edits 2023 Funding for Religious or Sectarian Activities Prohibited (1/99) Grant recipients located in Roseville (9/97)
Ownership or Long-term Lease of Property Improved by Grant Funds (11/99) Compliance with State of California Prevailing Wage Law – SB 975 (11/02) & AB 2690 (12/04) Tax Status (12/03)

Process-Related Policies

Annual Review (10/13, 6/17)
Recipient Reporting (11/99)
Appeal of Grant Advisory Commission Decision (9/97, 6/17)

Funds Expended within One Year (8/97)
Line Item Review (11/99)
Applicant Workshop (9/97)
Process to Amend or Extend Timeframe of Approved Grants (12/98) Site Visits (12/03) suggested edits 2023
Application Review and Process (12/03, 2/16, 6/17)

Funding Policies

Categories and Target Maximum Amount (9/97, 12/03, 2/16, 6/17, 11/20) Priority Areas (11/20)
Matching Funds Not Required (11/99)
Multiple Applications from One Agency (12/03, 6/17)
Multiple Year Grants (9/97, 12/03)
Perpetual Funding (11/99)
Fund Investing and Funding Source (11/05, 2/16)
Funding for Schools (11/08, 6/17)
Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 7 suggested amendments 2023

Criteria for Grant Applicants

Original Criteria and Application Submittal Requirements Adopted July 1994 Revised February 2016

The original criteria and application form were established by the Grant Evaluation Criteria Subcommittee in 1994. The subcommittee conducted public meetings on May 24, June 14, and June 27 to discuss and revise the guidelines and presented their draft, adopted by the Commission on June 27
th to the City Council on July 6, 1994.

The criteria included a points/rating system that was not adopted by the Commission. A majority of the questions in the current application were as originally drafted. New policies that have amended the application over time are discussed in this manual.

In January 2014, the Grants Advisory Commission approved, and made a requirement that all, Grant Applications be submitted via an online web-based program.

Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Adopted January 1999

The Commission added a question to the application form requesting specific information regarding compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The City is not allowed to fund programs or services by agencies that do not comply with ADA. Applicants are also required to comply with state disability laws, which in many cases are more stringent than the federal ADA law.

Bids Required for Capital ItemsExpenditures Adopted January 1996 Revised October 1999
Revised February 2016
Suggested edit 2023

In January 1996, the Commission adopted a requirement for applicants to submit bids for ”capital expenditures.” Capital expenditures for individual items and projects less than $500 do not require documented bids. Capital projects expenditures for individual items and projects costing $2,43,999 and under must have at least three (3) documented telephone or written bids documented/included with the submitted application. Capital items expenditures for individual items and projects costing $2,54,000 and above must have three (3) written bids included with the submitted application. Bids do not have to be awarded to the lowest bidder; bids should be awarded to the most responsible bidder.

If, in the rare case, the capital expenditure item or project is not conducive to bidding, an explanation in lieu of bid information should be attached to the application, e.g.,

This language was modified in October 1999 by the Commission and approved by the City Council based on input from grant applicants. In some instances, three bids are not available for specialized equipment that may be manufactured by only one or two companies.

AlsoAdditionally, in mostsome cases, telephone, online and written bids are only valid for 30 to 60 days or less;, while the grant application process runs from approximately December through MayFebruary to June (120 days) for final approval, which may extends beyond the expiration Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 8 suggested amendments 2023 date for the bids. The bids are still to be included in the packetapplication, but with notations if less than three (3) bids are included.

Bid Requirements Summary: Individual items and projects costing $2500 - $2,43,999 require three (3) documented telephone, online or written cost estimates. Individual items and projects $2,54,000 or greater require three (3) written cost estimates. Individual items or projects less than $2500 do not require an estimate.

Capital expenditure – An expenditure that results in the acquisition of fixed assets or additions to fixed assets that have benefits for more than one (1) year. Examples include: the acquisition of land; existing buildings; land improvements; construction of buildings; additions and remodeling of buildings; initial, additional, and replacement of equipment, furniture and fixtures, machinery, vehicles, and media materials.

Funding for Religious or Sectarian Activities Prohibited Adopted January 1999

In January 1999, the Commission added a question to the application form asking if funding would be used to support any religious or sectarian activities. The City is allowed to fund religious organizations, but the activity, project or program cannot include the promotion a particular religious belief. The City is prohibited from funding religious activities based on laws governing the separation of church and state.
____________________________________________________________________________

Grant Recipients Located in Roseville Adopted September 1997

The Commission and Council specified that grant recipients are to be located in Roseville rather than previous wording stating that grant recipients are to be “local.” In practice, this has been interpreted by the Commission to mean that grant recipients that provide service in Roseville, but may have headquarters or offices in other locations, are eligible for funding.

Ownership or Long-Term Lease for Properties Adopted November 1999 Improved by Grant Funds Revised February 2016

Concerns were raised during the 1999-2000 grant funding cycle regarding the investment in properties by grant applicants who do not own the property. The public funds are therefore making the property of a private citizen more valuable. Grant applicants are required to submit ownership documents and/or copies of lease agreements that reveal how long the property will be leased by the applicant. With long-term leases, the value of any capital improvements will depreciate over time and benefit the grant recipients directly. The Commission recommended and the Council adopted a policy to review the applicants with long-term leases on a case-by- case basis. Staff is to look at the amount of grant funding requested and the use of the funds in particular.

Compliance with California Prevailing Wage Law – SB 975 Adopted November 2002 Revised December 2004
Revised February 2016

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 9 suggested amendments 2023 The California Labor Code as amended by SB 975 in 2000 affects applicants to the Citizens’ Benefit Fund in two ways: the requirement to pay prevailing wages for public or private works of improvement that receive public funds and the use of volunteer labor.

By Interoffice Memorandum from the City Attorney’s Office to the City Manager’s Office dated September 20, 2002, the attorney clearly states applicants must comply with the SB 975. The memo details the policy for the State Prevailing Wage Laws and the Applicability to Volunteer Labor. The memorandum is attached as Appendix G to the Policy Manual.

By Interoffice Memorandum from the City Attorney’s office to the City Manager’s office dated August 31, 2004, the requirement that prevailing wages be paid to volunteers on public works projects was repealed by urgency legislation signed by the Governor.

Under the new law, AB 2690, the requirement to pay prevailing wages does not apply to volunteers, volunteer coordinators, or members of the California Conservation Corps or Community Conservation Corps. Although a volunteer cannot be paid, the volunteer may receive reasonable meals, lodging, transportation, and incidental expenses or nominal non- monetary awards without losing volunteer status if those benefits and payments are not a substitute form of compensation for work performed. The Memorandum is attached as Appendix H to the Policy Manual.

State Prevailing Wage Laws. Any grant applicant receiving $1,000 or greater in public monies, in this case, Citizens’ Benefit Fund, must pay prevailing wages to all workers employed on public works. Public works actually includes any public or private work of improvement, and is defined as “construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds.” (Labor Code Section 1720 (a)(1)).

Exceptions to the law include public utility improvements, carpet installation, transportation projects, and certain residential and low-income housing projects. (Labor Code Section 1720(a)).

An applicant or their advisor may request the Director of Industrial Relations to provide an opinion as to the applicability of SB 975 to their project. Previous opinions and current prevailing wages can be found at the state agency’s web-site: www.dir.ca.gov.

Tax Status Adopted December 2003 June 2017

The Grants Advisory Commission is recommending that only agencies with the following tax status be eligible for funding.
 501(C) 3
 501(C) 4
 Private schools
Applications from agencies that are not within one of these categories will be ineligible. For example, 501 (C) (6) are not eligible because 1) by definition they exist primarily to serve their members rather than the community at large and 2) they can lobby and take political positions on issues, thus creating potential for conflict of interest.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 10 suggested amendments 2023

Process-Related Policies

Annual Review Adopted October 2013
Revised February 2016
Revised June 2017

The Grants Staff Liaison will annually review the Grant Application and Guidelines, and make revisions to improve efficiencies. The Grant Application and Guidelines shall reflect, but is not limited to: 1) current funds available; and 2) Council priorities, if identified. ____________________________________________________________________________

Recipient Reporting Adopted November 1999 Revised November 2005, 2008
Revised February 2016

Beginning with the 2009-10 funding cycle, applicants who fail to submit a Final Report for a grant received from the preceding funding year are not eligible to apply during the subsequent funding year, or any future funding cycle until at least one year after the Final Report has been submitted.

Beginning with the 2006-2007 funding cycle, each recipient is required to submit a report describing the expenditures and accomplishments achieved with the grant funds. The report is due within 30 days of the end of the grant period. In addition, the Commission at its discretion may also require a grant recipient to submit a “mid-year” report due six months from the grantee’s initial receipt of funds.

Appeal of Grant Advisory Commission Decision Adopted September 1997 Revised June 2017

There is no appeal of Grant eligibility made by the Grants Staff Liaison or allocation recommendation made by the Commission. Final allocation decisions are made by the City Council.

Funds Expended within One Year Adopted August 1997

Based upon several requests from agencies that funds be carried over to another fiscal year, or be used for additional purposes, the Commission voted to revise all forms stating that funds must be expended during the fiscal year for which the grant was included in the City budget.

The Citizens’ Benefit Fund contract was also amended to state that all funds must be spent with one year.

Line Item Review Adopted November 1999

The City Council reaffirmed a standing practice that individual grant applications may be reviewed by the City Council following the recommendations being forwarded by the Grants Advisory Commission. The City Council reviews the recommendations as part of the annual Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 11 suggested amendments 2023 budget adoption in June of each year. Councilmembers may “pull” individual grant applications for discussion, questions, and separate action.
____________________________________________________________________________

Applicant Workshop Adopted September 1997 Revised November 2004
Revised February 2016

The Grants Advisory Commission strongly encourages that a representative from each applying agency attend the applicant workshop, held on the 2nd Tuesday of January.

Process to Amend or Extend Timeframe of Adopted December 1998 Approved Grants

In September 1998, the Commission determined that a formal process should be established to clearly define the requirements in the event a change to an approved grant was requested by a grant recipient. Through the work of Policy Subcommittee members, Sylvia Besana, Carol Garcia, and Susan Rohan, guidelines and a standard form were drafted for use by future applicants. Appendix F includes the Guidelines and Form approved by the City Council on December 16, 1998. As stated in the Guidelines, the City does not encourage amendments to approved grants. Circumstances may warrant flexibility by the Grants Commission and the City Council; however, only if the criteria established by the Policy Subcommittee are met and the amendment process is followed.

Site Visits Adopted December 2003 Revised February 2016
Suggested Edit 2023

The Commission reached consensus to NOT conduct site visits during the application period- beginning when applications become available to applicants until City Council takes action on funding recommendations (approximately, December (January through May) June and to limit visits to other times during the year.

If individual Grants Commissioners visit applicants during the process of reviewing grants, they may receive information in addition to that contained in the written application that is not received by the other Commissioners (in addition to general Brown Act considerations). The City’s criteria specifically states the grant will be awarded based upon the written materials provided to the Commission for its consideration.

For clarity, “site visits” includes visiting the physical location(s) or site(s) of an applicant or anticipated applicant (collectively, “applicant”) of grant funding, as well as attending, participating, or visiting, a location where an applicant(s) is hosting, co-hosting, sponsoring, or otherwise engaged in carrying out an event, program, open house, or activity.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 12 suggested amendments 2023

Application Review and Process Adopted December 2003 Modified October 2013
Revised February 2016
Revised June 2017

The Grants Commission Staff Liaison shall review and either approve or disqualify each grant application. Staff will make their decisions based upon the materials submitted by the agency and/or organization. Grant applications submitted without required and/or complete documents will be disqualified. Grant applicants do not have the right to appeal disqualifications.

The Grants Advisory Commission will meet in the Council Chambers on the second Tuesday of April to review and recommend final funding for each grant application.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 13 suggested amendments 2023

Funding Policies

City Projects Adopted September 1997 Reaffirmed October 1999
Revised February 2016

Due to the limited amount of funding in the community and the high level of local need for qualifying projects, City projects and programs will no longer qualify for funding.

Categories and Target Maximum Amount Adopted September 1997 Revised December 2003
Revised February 2016
Revised June 2017
Revised November 2020

In keeping with the original intent of the sale of the Roseville hospital to “Improve the Quality of Life for the Citizens of Roseville”, Service Categories have been aligned with Social Determinants of Health as interpreted in the Kone Consulting community workshops with the goal of making Roseville a healthier community. The City Council approved updated funding Service Categories as follows:
 Neighborhood and Physical Environment – Improved access to safe and affordable housing for all
 Food – Increased access to healthier food options for lower income communities  Health and Wellness – Improved physical, mental, and behavioral health and wellness  Community and Social Context – Improved access to arts and cultural resources for all and a kinder, more inclusive and connected community  Education – More vocational training and educational opportunities for all ages

For a more detailed definition of previously approved CBF Categories, please refer to the 2013 Historical Assessment of the Roseville Grant Program (Appendix I). At its discretion, the Grants Advisory Commission, with action by the City Council, may wish to prioritize the above-stated categories for CBF funding for a given application year.

Funding Priorities Adopted November 2020

The target goal is to divide the grants awards among the three areas described below. The Commission will work to fund grant requests to the extent it is reasonable based on funds available, the applications received and the consensus on merit of the proposals in a given year.

The City Council approved the addition of the following funding priorities:

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 14 suggested amendments 2023

1. Strategic, one-time grants for innovative projects or programs, capital improvements or new initiatives. Examples of these “special” grants may be:
o  New Initiatives – Applicant identifies a need, service, or opportunity in the community that could offer an enhanced and improved quality of life or experience in Roseville.
o  Innovative Ideas – Based on models from other areas or agencies and attempting to take a new approach in providing opportunity to enhance or improve quality of life or experience in Roseville.
o  One-time requests – If applicants need special consideration on a single request basis.

2. Operational/Mission support grants for programs or projects that demonstrate effectiveness addressing a community need. Grant recipient can reapply in future years for this priority area.

3. Smaller requests of up to $10,000 which can go towards either new programs/projects or support existing operations which have demonstrated effectiveness at meeting community needs.
____________________________________________________________________________

Matching Funds Not Required Adopted November 1999

The City Council approved the Grants Advisory Commission recommendation that matching funds not be required of grant applicants. Mandating that matching funds be required would limit the application numbers and the flexibility of the Commission and Council to award grants to worthy applicants. Matching funds will be a component of the evaluation by Commissioners and Council in determining which applicants have demonstrated their commitment to a project, but will not be mandatory.

Multiple Applications from One Agency Affirmed December 2003 Revised November 2004
Revised June 2017

The Commission agreed that the practice of allowing multiple grant applications from a single agency should not be continued. The City Council has directed the Commission to issue fewer larger grants.

Multiple Year Grants Adopted September 1997 Reaffirmed November 2020

The Grants Advisory Commission and City Council discussed, but voted against allowing grant applicants to apply for funding beyond one fiscal year. Funding is only available for the fiscal year in which the grant is approved.

The Commission and Council affirmed this policy after discussion in 2020.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 15 suggested amendments 2023

Perpetual Funding Adopted November 1999 Reaffirmed December 2003

The City Council approved the Grants Advisory Commission recommendation that no limit be set on the number of years a grant applicant may receive funding. Grant applicants will be judged on their individual merit each year.

The Commission and Council affirmed this policy after discussion in 2003. There are several agencies that receive repetitive funding from the Citizens’ Benefit Fund. In fact, five organizations have received funding in all of the past ten funding cycles, and six organizations have received funding in eight of the last ten funding cycles. The Commission agreed that because the agencies provide worthy services to the community and Commissioners do an independent evaluation each year, there should not be a limit on repetitive funding.

Fund Investing & Funding Source Adopted November 2005 Revised February 2016

Grant Funds shall be invested in accordance with the Government Code §53601, as determined by the City’s Chief Financial Officer or his designee.

Grant Fund proceeds in excess of $500,000 shall be retained for smoothing during lean years and/or special project or community benefits, as approved by the City Council.

The Grants Advisory Commission may award grants from multiple funding sources. In the event that an applicant meets funding criteria for more than one funding source, the Commission has the discretion to make awards from any or all funds for which any individual applicant is eligible.

Grant Requests from Schools Adopted November 2008 Revised June 2017

Private School and non-profit Parent-Teacher Clubs, Booster Clubs and non-profit school-based programs are eligible to apply and are limited to one grant request per site.

Citizens’ Benefit Fund Policy Manual 16 suggested amendments 2023

Appendices (to be replaced/updated annually by City staff as needed)

Related Ordinances - Appendix A

Funding Guidelines for Current Year - Appendix B

Grant Application for Current Year - Appendix C

Request for Funds & Report of Expenditures - Appendix D

Grant Agreement - Appendix E

Request for Amendment to CBF Grant - Appendix F

Memorandum re: SB975 and Citizens’ Benefit Fund - Appendix G

Memorandum re: AB 2690 and Citizens’ Benefit Fund - Appendix H

2013 Historical Assessment of the Roseville Grant Program – Appendix I

Implementation Strategy 2019/20 Kone’ Consulting’s CNA - Appendix J

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2995
File #:
0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
Title:

Sierra View Country Club - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact:

David Samuelson 916-774-5442 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public easements offered thereon; and approve the abandonment of the easements listed thereon.

2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services Department, Engineering Division, has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 75 residential lots,
1 private road lot
and 11 private common area lots.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council approval of the Sierra View Country Club Final Map project is an action that is subject to CEQA. Project level CEQA compliance for the Sierra View Country Club Final Map project was accomplished with preparation of the Sierra View Country Club & Sierra Vista Specific Plan Redesignation and Rezoning Project Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study (IS/MND) (Adopted: January 19, 2022). Because the Sierra View Country Club Final Map project is consistent with the project evaluated in the IS/MND, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from IS/MND will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
David Samuelson, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
final map
Vicinity Map
Resolution 23-414
subdivision agreement
THIS MAP OF "SIERRA VIEW COUNTRY CLUB" WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND ISBASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAPACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF WP SIERRA VIEW, LLC, IN FEBRUARY 2021, I HEREBYSTATE THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN, THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THECHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONSBEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2025, AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THESURVEY TO BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THECONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
LICENSE EXPIRES: SEPTEMBER 30, 2024CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLEMARC STOUT, R.C.E. 69879 DATE:BY: CITY CLERK, CITY OF ROSEVILLEASSISTANT CITY CLERK I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP OF "SIERRA VIEW COUNTRY CLUB" AND FIND ITTO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE MAP ON FILE AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONSTHEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCESHAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ROSEVILLE, HAS APPROVED THIS FINAL MAP OF"SIERRA VIEW COUNTRY CLUB", AND HAS ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FORDEDICATION AND DOES ALSO HEREBY APPROVE THE ABANDONMENT OF THE EASEMENTS LISTEDHEREON WITHIN NOTE 6 ON SHEET 2.

I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THIS FINAL MAP OF "SIERRA VIEW COUNTRY CLUB" ISTECHNICALLY CORRECT.FOR MARC STOUT, CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLEDATE:

DATE:

EXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 2023TIMOTHY G. BLAIR, PLS 8278.

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT

CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
DEPUTYDOCUMENT NO.: FEE: $ BY: STATE OF CALIFORNIARECORDER OF PLACER COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENTFILED THIS DAY OF , 2023, AT .M. IN BOOK OF MAPS, ATPAGE , IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, AT THE REQUEST OFMACKAY & SOMPS CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
, A NOTARY PUBLIC

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS COUNTYMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

COUNTY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.

ON BEFORE ME,PERSONALLY APPEARED I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THEFOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.SIGNATUREPRINTED NAMEMY COMMISSION NUMBER:

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S)IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEYEXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIRSIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THEPERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITYOF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, ANDNOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

SVCC 75, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
1 BY:NAME: MARTIN Z. ZIEGLERTITLE: MANAGER

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY RECORD TITLEINTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN UPON THIS FINAL MAP OF"SIERRA VIEW COUNTRY CLUB" AND THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATIONOF THIS FINAL MAP AND HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIFICPURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:(A)A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF, BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATERAND GAS PIPES, SEWER PIPES, AND FOR UNDERGROUND WIRE AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION SERVICES AND TRAFFIC CONTROL APPURTENANCES TOGETHERWITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS LOTSE AND L AND THOSE STRIPS OF LAND LYING CONTIGUOUS TO LOT L AS SHOWN HEREON ANDDESIGNATED "P.U.E." (PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT).(B)A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE PIPES TOGETHERWITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSSTHOSE AREAS AS SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "D.E." (DRAINAGE EASEMENT).(C)EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF EMERGENCY SERVICEVEHICLES ON, OVER AND ACROSS LOT L (PRIVATE ROAD) FOR USE BY PUBLIC, CITY, COUNTY ORSTATE AGENCIES IN RESPONSE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE, MEDICAL OR EMERGENCIESCAUSED BY NATURAL DISASTERS, AS SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "E.A.E." (EMERGENCYACCESS EASEMENT).END OF PUBLIC DEDICATIONSTHE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARE THE FOLLOWING:1.PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (P.S.D.E.) FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES AND USESAPPURTENANT THERETO, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ANDMAINTENANCE OF GRAVITY FLOW OR PRESSURE PIPE, OR OPEN DRAINAGE CHANNEL, ANDSTORMWATER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT FACILITIES UPON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THOSEAREAS SO DESIGNATED ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (OR ITSSUCCESSOR IN INTEREST).

OWNER'S STATEMENT
MACKAY & SOMPS CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.PEDRO JARQUIN, PLS 8268EXPIRATION DATE: DECEMBER 31, 2023BY:DATE:

DUNESDRIVE

DIAMOND OAKS ROADWHISTLINGSTRAITS DRIVE

DUNESCOURT

SHASTA STREET

TORREYPINESDRIVE

TORREY PINESCOURT
47 LOT E30
3231
3536
34 42
6564
4648
33 171819
1213148
7 91011
20 41
55 63
72 56
LOT G
49 57
66 50
58 67
51 59
68 52
60 69
53 61
70 54
62 71
4 1516
LOT F
25 LOT I29
38 45 LOT DLOT C
37 4039LOT J
4344
LOT K
44 171819121314879101120
4155
63 72
56 LOT G
49 57
66 50
58 67
51 59
68 5247
LOT E303231353634
42 6564
4648
3360
69 53
61 70
54 62
71 4
1516
LOT F
25 LOT I2938
45LOT DLOT C
37 4039LOT J
4344LOT K

BAY HILL COURT

DUNESDRIVE

DIAMOND OAKS ROADWHISTLINGSTRAITS DRIVE

SAWGRASS PLACE

BETHPAGE COURT

BANDONDUNESCOURT

SHASTA STREET

TORREYPINESDRIVE

TORREY PINESCOURTSOUTHERNHILLSCOURT
BANDON
7475
736
5 LOT H
2 LOT B
3 1
LOT A
ROW2
ROW11523LOT H7475736
LOT B
21222324
2726
28 21222324262728
LOT A

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

LEGEND

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTEDDIMENSION POINTRECORD DATA PER REFERENCE( )

PARCEL MAPPM
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTRIGHT-OF-WAYSACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICTP.U.E.R/WSMUD

FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTEDFOUND ONE-QUARTER SECTION CORNER AS NOTED DOCUMENT NUMBER, O.R.DNEMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTE.A.E.OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTYO.R.

ACCESS EASEMENTA.E.

WATERLINE EASEMENTW.L.E.

REFERENCES:1.35 PM 462.DN 2014-0014272 (LLA)3.9 RS 364.N MAPS 685.Q MAPS 796.M MAPS 877.N MAPS 69 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE/PLUG "RCE 25169" PER (1)FOUND 1 1/2" BRASS CAP IN MONUMENT WELL "LS 3404" PER (4)FOUND 1 1/2" BRASS CAP IN MONUMENT WELL "LS 2846" PER (6) NOTES:1.TOTAL AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS 23.104± ACRES GROSS,CONSISTING OF 75 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 11 PRIVATE COMMON AREALOTS AND 1 PRIVATE ROAD LOT.2.ALL CURVES ARE DIMENSIONED WITH RADIUS, DELTA, ARC LENGTH,CHORD BEARING AND CHORD LENGTH. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREONARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF AND ARE "GROUND" DISTANCES.DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF INDIVIDUAL DIMENSIONS MAY NOTEQUAL THE OVERALL DIMENSION.3.A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY WAS PREPARED BYYOUNGDAHL CONSULTING GROUP, INC. PROJECT NO. E20160.001,DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 2021 . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - ENGINEERINGFILE NUMBER 308-952.4.ALL FRONT CORNERS ARE MARKED BY A 1" DIAMETER BRASS DISCSTAMPED "LS 8268" IN THE SIDEWALK ON THE EXTENSION OF SIDE LOTLINES 1.00' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. WHERE SIDEWALK DOES NOTEXIST, FRONT CORNERS SHALL BE MARKED BY A 1" DIAMETER BRASSDISC STAMPED "LS 8268" ON A 2.00' EXTENSION OF SIDE LOT LINES INTHE GUTTER PAN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.ALL REAR CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS WILL BE SET WITH A 5/8"REBAR AND PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 8268", WHERE A REAR CORNERFALLS WITHIN A MASONRY RETAINING WALL, MASONRY SOUND WALLOR CONCRETE FOOTING, A 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"LS 8268" WILL BE SET ON THE SIDE LOT LINE ON A 4.00 FOOT OFFSETTO THE REAR CORNER OR A BRASS TAG STAMPED "LS 8268" WILL BESET WITH EPOXY TO THE FACE OF WALL 2.00 FOOT ABOVE GROUND ORON TOP OF WALL WHERE AN OFFSET MONUMENT CANNOT BE SET.REAR CORNERS FOR LOTS 49-62 AND LOTS 66 - 75 WILL BE SET WITH A5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 8268" ON THE SIDE LOTLINE OFFSET 4.00 FEET FROM THE REAR LOT CORNER.6.PURSUANT TO SECTION 66499.20.2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, THELANDS SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY MERGED AND RE-SUBDIVIDEDAND THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBYABANDONED:a.THE 10' P.U.E. PER 35 PM 46.b.THE ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER 937 O.R. 692.

7.STREET OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE INCLUDING STREET LIGHTS,LOT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND SURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AREPRIVATE AND THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNER'SASSOCIATION.8.LOT L (PRIVATE ROAD) SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE GRANTED IN FEETO THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AS A PRIVATE ROAD FOR THEBENEFIT AND GENERAL USE OF THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS SHOWNHEREON.9.LOTS A, B, C, D, E, F, G AND H SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE GRANTED INFEE TO THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AS COMMON AREAS FORLANDSCAPING AND FOR THE BENEFIT AND GENERAL USE OF THERESIDENTIAL LOTS SHOWN HEREON.10.LOTS I, J AND K SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE GRANTED IN FEE TO THESIERRA TOWNHOMES HOA BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT.11.DEED OVERLAP AT NORTHERLY END OF EAST BOUNDARY WITH WESTBOUNDARY OF Q MAPS 79. SUBDIVISION MAPS Q MAPS 79 AND NMAPS 68 HAVE A CONTINUOUS BEARING ALONG EAST BOUNDARY OFSUBJECT PROPERTY TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OFDIAMOND OAKS ROAD. LLA DN 2014-0014272 HAS A BEARING BREAKAT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 125' SMUDEASEMENT (917 O.R 409) WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY. HELD WEST LINEOF SUBDIVISION MAPS TO THE EAST. (SEE DETAIL "B", SHEET 4)12.THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OFTHAT CERTAIN "GOLF COURSE EASEMENT AND WAIVER OF LIABILITYAND RESTRICTION AGREEMENT" RECORDED JULY 13, 2023 ASDOCUMENT NO. 2023-0036645, O.R.

CHORD BEARINGCBCHORD DISTANCECD

XSHEET INDEXCENTER LINEIOD/ROWEASEMENT LINE

SUBDIVISION BOUNDARYLOT LINE & R/WADJACENT PROPERTY LINELOT LINE OVERALL(OA)LANDSCAPE EASEMENTL.E.

RECORD OF SURVEYRSRADIAL BEARING(R)SQUARE FEETSF
5 6
7 8
10 11
SHEET INDEX1" = 200'
2 SET 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 8268"SET 2 1/2" BRASS CAP IN MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "LS 8268"

HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATIONHOA

SECTION LINE
S39°35'23"E 10816.73'
N01°42'09"E 14074.04'
S16°07'15"E 23320.50'

FOUND NGS MONUMENT AS NOTED
FOUND NGS MONUMENT, PID: DH6533 (INDUSTRIAL)GRID N:2,050,111.92GRID E:6,758,793.91 FOUND NGS MONUMENT,PID: JS4669 (HPGN CA 03 09)GRID N:2,027,708.41GRID E:6,765,269.13 FOUND SQUARE HEAD BOLT IN CONCRETE, HELDBASE OF BOLT SHAFT FOR SECTION CORNERCOMMON TO SECTIONS 26, 27, 34 AND 35 PER (1)(GRID)(GRID) (GRID)
PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENTP.S.D.E.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE CALIFORNIA STATE PLANECOORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 2, NAD83(2011) (EPOCH 2010.00), MEASURED BETWEENNGS STATION "INDUSTRIAL" (PID-DH6533) AND NGS STATION "HPGN CA 03 09"(PID-JS4669). SAID BEARING IS SOUTH 16°07'15" EAST. DISTANCES SHOWN AREGROUND DISTANCES. TO CONVERT TO GRID, MULTIPLY GROUND DISTANCES BY THECOMBINED FACTOR OF 0.999927205.

BASIS OF BEARINGS
9 RESULTANT PARCEL 1DN 2014-001427223.104±ACRES
N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)S89°16'52"W 251.89'
N08°14'44"W 82.76'N60°48'47"W 159.67'N29°44'38"W(R) 80.88'R=215.00' Δ=24°29'24" L=91.90'CB=N48°00'40"E CD=91.20' N35°45'58"E 52.56'R=187.00' Δ=25°52'24" L=84.44'(2)(7)CB=N48°42'09"E CD=83.73'N61°38'21"E 30.18' N28°59'05"W(R) 26.00'
R=187.00' Δ=68°34'43" L=223.82'CB=N26°43'33"E CD=210.70'N07°33'48"W 22.00'S82°25'52"W 80.24'N78°49'33"W 22.97'S11°10'27"W 7.80'S82°25'52"W 9.51'N73°51'08"W(R) 17.69' R=112.00' Δ=30°04'13" L=58.78'(2)(7)CB=N01°06'45"E CD=58.11' N13°55'21"W 9.56'S76°04'39"W 31.60'N67°11'08"W 130.00'N17°50'29"E 530.26' 1092.14'
N00°19'58"W 2637.86'

WALTON WAY
SHASTA STREET25' P.U.E. PER2583 O.R. 158
FOUND 3/4"REBAR, NO TAGFOUND 5/8" REBAR/CAP"LS 5109", NO RECORD FOUND 3/4" REBAR, NO TAG,IN FENCE POST FOOTING,2.00' SOUTH. HELD FORNORTH/SOUTH LINE N22°46'50"E 106.55'(N23°44'57"E 106.67')(1)FOUND 3/4" REBAR WITHTAG "LS 3636" PER (7)(N00°40'45"E 2637.83')(1)(7) (N18°51'03"E 530.26')(1)
N01°51'29"W 713.29'334.12'379.17'(N00°49'30"E 713.30')(6)(334.17')(6)(379.13')(6)135.05'(TIE)135.35'(TIE)(135.00')(2) (135.00')(2)(N00°49'30"W 2222.58')(2)(1092.51')(3)(6)(S89°42'00"E 251.95')(1)(2) R=427.00' Δ=7°29'25" L=55.82'CB=S85°32'09"W CD=55.78'(N07°12'11"W 82.62')(2)(S59°44'37"E 159.65')(2) (S07°12'11"E 83.01')(7)(S59°44'37"E 159.64')(7)
(S28°44'03"E 80.88')(2)(S29°34'44"E 79.24')(7)(S36°46'32"W 52.56')(2)(N36°46'32"E 57.56')(7) (N62°38'55"E 30.18')(2)(7)
(N27°58'31"W 26.00')(2)(7)
(R=187.00' Δ=68°34'43" L=223.82'CB=N27°44'07"E CD=210.70')(2)(R=187.00' Δ=68°35'03" L=223.84'CB=N27°43'57"E CD=210.70')(7)(S06°33'14"E 22.00')(2)(S06°33'34"E 22.00')(7) (N23°43'26"E 106.67')(7)
(N83°26'26"E 80.24')(2)(S77°48'59"E 22.97')(2)(N12°11'01"E 7.80')(2)(N83°26'26"E 9.51')(2)(S72°50'34"E 17.69')(2)(7)(S12°54'47"E 9.56')(2)(7)(N77°05'13"E 31.60')(2)(7)(S66°10'34"E 130.00')(2)(S66°16'34"E 130.00')(7) FOUND IRON PIPE WITH 2 1/2" BRASSDISK STAMPED AS SHOWN PER (1)3435 FENCE INTERSECTIONWEST 0.2'±
R=213.00' Δ=0°37'27" L=2.32'(2)(7)CB=N61°19'39"E CD=2.32'

12.5' P.U.E. PER2583 O.R. 158
(R=215.00' Δ=24°29'24" L=91.90'CB=N49°01'15"E CD=91.20')(2)(R=215.00' Δ=23°38'45" L=88.73'CB=N48°35'54"E CD=88.10')(7) (R=427.00' Δ=7°30'23" L=55.94'CB=N86°32'48"E CD=55.90')(2)(CB=N49°42'44"E CD=83.73')(2)(7) (CB=N60°20'13"E CD=2.32')(2)(7)
N00°19'58"W 2637.86'
SIERRA OAKS COURTN01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)(N00°49'30"W 2222.58')(2)(N00°49'30"W 2222.58')(2) N08°12'34"W(R)
(1092.18')(1)
N17°50'29"E 530.26'(N18°51'03"E 530.26')(1)
N59°03'09"E 0.38'
FENCEINTERSECTIONWEST 0.6'±
S01°50'04"E 1092.14'
S01°50'04"E 1005.40'

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

SEE SHEET 4
3DETAIL "A"N.T.S.

FOUND 3/4" REBARON-LINE, NO TAG,PER 8 PM 28
FOUND 3/4" REBAR,ILLEGIBLE TAG
DETAIL "A"N.T.S.
27 2634 35FOUND SQUARE HEAD BOLT INCONCRETE, HELD BASE OF BOLTSHAFT FOR SECTION CORNERCOMMON TO SECTIONS 26, 27,34 AND 35 PER (1) SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, REFERENCES, BASIS OF BEARING AND LEGEND SEE DETAIL "A"ON THIS SHEET
N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)
N17°50'29"E 530.26'
N31°20'52"W 995.30'R=527.00' Δ=23°11'43" L=213.35'(2)CB=N79°16'02"W CD=211.89' R=373.00' Δ=9°24'39" L=61.27'CB=S86°09'34"E CD=61.20' S22°19'50"W(R)
1005.40' (1)(5)124.99'

43.55'177.98'N00°19'58"W 2637.86'

DIAMOND OAKS ROAD
FENCE INTERSECTIONWEST 2.9'±FENCE INTERSECTIONWEST 3.2'± 124.95'SMUD RIGHT-OF-WAYPER 917 O.R. 409250' TRANSMISSIONLINE EASEMENTPER 612 O.R. 534 N89°08'21"E 221.53'
N89°08'06"E 307.36'
30' WATER LINEEASEMENT PERDN 2001-0094055P.U.E. PER (4) 15' SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM DRAIN EASEMENTPER 1096 O.R. 333 P.U.E. PER 1105 O.R. 76(N00°40'45"E 2637.83')(1)(7)
(N18°51'03"E 530.26')(1)
(N30°20'18"E 995.30')(1)(2)
FENCE SOUTH 4.0'±
FENCE SOUTH 4.7'±
(N89°51'05"E)(1)(2)(1)(2)
(125.07')(2)
FOUND SQUARE HEAD BOLT INCONCRETE, HELD BASE OF BOLT SHAFTFOR SECTION CORNER COMMON TOSECTIONS 26, 27, 34 AND 35 PER (1)

SHASTA STREET
(N89°50'40"W 307.36')(2)(4)
(R=373.00' Δ=9°23'31" L=61.14'CB=N85°08'54"W CD=61.07')(2)(4) RESULTANT PARCEL 1DN 2014-001427223.104±ACRES
(N00°49'30"W 2222.58')(2)130.17'(TIE)(129.98')(5)
R=600.00' Δ=4°24'20" L=46.14'CB=N74°06'30"W CD=46.12'(R=600.00' Δ=4°23'44" L=46.03'CB=N73°04'58"W CD=46.02')(4)(5) S71°54'20"E 149.79'(S70°53'06"E 149.79')(4)(5)R=400.00' Δ=18°57'34" L=132.36' (4)CB=N81°23'07"W CD=131.76' N89°08'06"E 307.36'(N89°50'40"W 307.36')(4)
R=500.00' Δ=32°20'40" L=282.26' (4)CB=N74°41'34"W CD=278.53' N58°31'14"W 29.57'(N57°30'00"W 29.57')(4)
FOUND 1 1/2" BRASSDISC, NO MARKS, INMONUMENT BOX
27'
27'
SEE DETAIL "B"34352726
621.58'(1)
(43.66')(2)
(CB=N73°40'20"W CD=278.52')(4)(CB=N78°14'48"W CD=211.89')(2) (CB=N80°21'53"W CD=131.76')(4)
N00°19'58"W 2637.86'(N00°40'45"E 2637.83')(1)(7)N00°19'58"W 2637.86' SIERRA OAKS COURT(N00°49'30"W 2222.58')(2)
N00°51'54"W172.55'(N00°09'20"E)(2)
N17°50'29"E 530.26'(N18°51'03"E 530.26')(1)
WOOD FENCEANGLE POINTON-LINE47.60'(2)
N08°32'46"E(R)

DIAMONDOAKS ROAD
STUCCO WALLWEST 1.4'±FENCEINTERSECTIONWEST 1.6'±(S00°09'20"W 125.00')(2)(S00°49'30"E 125.00')(4)(5)WOOD FENCEWEST 2.9'±S00°51'54"E 125.00'DEED OVERLAP(SEE NOTE 11ON SHEET 2)N89°08'06"E 2.13'(N89°50'40"W 2.13')(2)S01°50'04"E 124.99'

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

8.49'
R=229.00'Δ=31°43'47"L=126.82'CB=N87°27'03"WCD=125.20' Δ=12°08'46"L=48.55'CB=N77°39'33"WCD=48.45'Δ=17°45'58"L=71.01'CB=N87°23'06"ECD=70.72'R=45.00' Δ=29°57'43" L=23.53'CB=N61°42'12"E CD=23.26' 7 4
N78°12'20"E 123.80'61.15'
N00°40'45"W 98.70'5,708 SF7
N00°51'54"W 172.55'
N89°08'21"E 221.53'
S22°19'50"W(R)R=527.00'Δ=23°11'43"L=213.35'CB=N79°16'02"WCD=211.89' N89°08'06"E 307.36'(OA) 536.71'(OA)
125' SMUD RIGHT OF WAYPER 917 O.R. 40930' WATER LINE EASEMENTPER DN 2001-009405515' SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM DRAIN EASEMENTPER 1096 O.R.333 10' P.U.E.

WHISTLING STRAITS DRIVE
(PRIVATE)
BAY HILL COURT(PRIVATE)3.663±ACLOT L

3.663±ACLOT L
R=500.00'Δ=32°20'40"L=282.26'CB=N74°41'34"WCD=278.53' N89°08'06"E 307.36'(OA)DIAMOND OAKS ROAD (P.U.E., E.A.E.)
(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
298.87'(OA)12.5' P.U.E.

N31°20'52"W 995.30'(OA)
FOUND SQUARE HEAD BOLT IN CONCRETE. HELDBASE OF BOLT SHAFT FOR SECTION CORNERCOMMON TO SECTIONS 26, 27, 34 AND 35 PER (1) N00°19'58"W 2637.86'(OA)
5 2
3 1
LOT A
ROW1
N48°27'00"E 95.66'
N00°51'39"W 57.74'
N35°25'33"W 178.58'
N33°23'19"E 99.13'
N88°41'57"W 81.04'N35°48'45"E 99.49'
N82°41'07"E 58.61'N14°52'43"W 131.99'
N14°52'43"W 91.59'N07°26'18"W 85.00'62.91'

86.31'

29.36' 21.95'

77.55'
165.75' 43.55'12.23'N89°08'21"E 57.52'52.61'4.91'
Δ=35°18'40"L=26.50'CB=N80°18'19"ECD=26.08'
Δ=15°55'39"L=11.95'CB=N54°41'10"ECD=11.92'
R=43.00'Δ=165°52'02"L=124.48'CB=N50°20'39"WCD=85.35'
R=49.00' Δ=49°46'19" L=42.57'CB=N77°29'06"W CD=41.24'R=267.00' Δ=9°41'50" L=45.19'CB=N82°28'39"E CD=45.14'R=26.00'Δ=102°56'53"L=46.72'CB=N35°51'08"ECD=40.68'N15°37'19"W 18.40'R=17.00' Δ=44°38'23" L=13.24'CB=N37°56'30"W CD=12.91'R=35.00' Δ=49°23'48" L=30.17'CB=N35°33'48"W CD=29.25' N10°51'54"W26.38'R=30.00' Δ=38°59'05" L=20.41'CB=N30°21'26"W CD=20.02'28,809 SFLOT A 8,447 SF1
7,225 SF2
9,242 SF3
6,885 SF4
5,786 SF5

2.783±ACLOT H
N13°18'57"W(R)10.24'N76°41'03"E 62.90'
N76°41'03"E18.95'Δ=1°49'03"L=7.26'CB=N77°35'35"ECD=7.26'N05°45'37"W32.60' N18°24'50"E(R)4.00' Δ=84°55'38"L=370.56'CB=N39°16'30"WCD=337.56'(OA)
N08°15'41"E (R)15.19'N53°26'02"W(R)N57°24'37"W(R)
S56°03'40"W(R)S07°57'39"W(R)S27°21'01"E(R)N11°29'53"W(R)N06°16'04"E(R) Δ=20°01'03"L=184.12'CB=N77°40'42"WCD=183.18'
R=26.00' Δ=90°57'44" L=41.28'CB=N43°50'22"E CD=37.08' N67°03'48"E(R)
S02°18'47"W(R) R=527.00'N40°09'02"E(R) R=30.00'
N15°37'19"W 77.76'
N10°51'54"W 64.50'37.08'

27.42'13.25'52.23'
R=50.00'Δ=23°53'00"L=20.84'CB=N03°40'49"WCD=20.69'17'21' LOT B
27 2634 35
20'20'
35'35'
21'17'

2.783±ACLOT H
Δ=21°34'38"L=94.15'CB=N87°28'22"ECD=93.59'
10' P.U.E. PER 1105 O.R. 7612.5' P.U.E.
15' SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM DRAIN EASEMENTPER 1096 O.R.333 N89°08'21"E 108.39'
R=39.00' Δ=90°50'05" L=61.83'CB=N81°59'01"E CD=55.55'ACCESS EASEMENT PERDN 2022-0049751STORM DRAIN EASEMENTPER DN 2022-0049752 40' PUE
Δ=48°38'57"L=197.84'CB=N47°15'41"WCD=191.95'
10' P.U.E.
40' P.U.E.

Curve TableCurve #C1Radius527.00'Delta3°10'40"Length29.23'Chord BearingN89° 16' 33"WChord Length29.23'

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

65.00'
234.19'
R=373.00' Δ=9°24'39" L=61.27'CB=N86°09'34"W CD=61.20' N08°32'46"E(R)
125' SMUD RIGHT OF WAYPER 917 O.R. 40915' SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM DRAIN EASEMENTPER 1096 O.R.333

BANDON(PRIVATE)DUNESDRIVE
R=400.00'Δ=18°57'34"L=132.36'CB=N81°23'07"WCD=131.76'(OA)12.5' P.U.E.N89°08'06"E 307.36'

WHISTLING STRAITS DRIVE
(PRIVATE)3.663±ACLOT L
N89°08'06"E 307.36'DIAMOND OAKS ROAD
(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
298.87'
N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)
7 74
75 73
6 5
LOT B
R=233.00'Δ=69°56'40"L=284.44'
CB=N36°36'50"WCD=267.10'
N15°37'19"W 77.76'
N10°51'54"W 64.50'37.08'

27.42'13.25'52.23' 241.87'R=30.00' Δ=63°07'48" L=33.05'CB=N20°42'01"E CD=31.41'N10°51'54"W 1.25'R=35.00' Δ=39°52'58" L=24.36'CB=N09°04'36"E CD=23.87'R=17.00' Δ=44°38'23" L=13.24'CB=N06°41'53"E CD=12.91'N15°37'19"W 17.40'R=104.00' Δ=7°53'54" L=14.34'CB=N19°34'16"W CD=14.33'N66°28'47"E(R) 4.00'R=100.00' Δ=42°40'06" L=74.47'CB=N44°51'16"W CD=72.76' N37°44'05"W(R)
R=271.00'Δ=69°22'38"L=328.14'
CB=N31°30'00"WCD=308.46'
N59°28'26"E 34.12'N58°56'27"E(R)

1.461±ACLOT B
8,288 SF75
R=250.00'Δ=106°30'16"L=464.71'CB=N50°03'49"WCD=400.64'(OA) R=50.00'Δ=23°53'00"L=20.84'CB=N03°40'49"WCD=20.69'20'20' 35'35'
21'17'
Δ=84°55'38"L=370.56'
CB=N39°16'30"WCD=337.56'

2.783±ACLOT H
6 74
7317'21'
10' P.U.E.

8.49'

3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
N67°03'48"E(R)
LOT A
17'21'
40' PUE

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OFSIERRA VIEW COUNTRY CLUB
1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189SHEET OF 1218512.000OCTOBER 2023SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0162BEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISON OF PARCEL 1 OF SIERRA VIEW PARCEL MAP #2,SUBDIVISION NO. 000142, FILED FOR RECORD MAY 3, 2013, IN BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS,AT PAGE 46, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS TOGETHER WITH 'RESULTANT PARCEL 1' OFTHAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FILED FORRECORD MARCH 6, 2014, IN DOCUMENT NO. 2014-0014272, OFFICIAL RECORDS, PLACERCOUNTY, WITHIN SECTIONS 26, 34 AND 35, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNTDIABLO MERIDIAN. 6 SEE SHEET 5
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, REFERENCES, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND LEGEND SEE SHEET 7
N00°40'45"W 93.91'
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5C6Δ=21°17'42"L=86.60'CB=N12°17'21"WCD=86.10'
Δ=12°58'23"L=61.36'CB=N13°20'11"WCD=61.23'Δ=10°02'18"L=47.48'CB=N01°49'50"WCD=47.42' Δ=44°10'57"L=37.79'CB=N18°28'20"WCD=36.86'
17'21'
S86°59'50"W(R)
Δ=7°46'24"L=51.01'CB=N53°27'44"WCD=50.97' R=355.00'Δ=46°09'47"L=286.02'CB=N72°39'26"WCD=278.35' CB=N76°19'20"WCD=147.87' Δ=59°40'12"L=44.78'CB=N12°46'40"WCD=42.79'
Δ=89°01'17"L=60.60'CB=N85°57'27"WCD=54.68'
Δ=1°55'41"L=60.03'CB=N00°06'43"WCD=60.03'
Δ=1°55'52"L=60.12'CB=N01°49'04"ECD=60.12'
R=49.00'Δ=67°18'21"L=57.56'CB=N30°02'02"WCD=54.31'Δ=12°06'48"L=71.46'CB=N69°44'36"WCD=71.33' Δ=13°09'27"L=77.62'CB=N82°22'44"WCD=77.45' Δ=1°55'38"L=60.00'CB=N02°02'22"WCD=60.00'
Δ=1°53'27"L=60.13'CB=N00°06'54"ECD=60.13'
Δ=2°03'34"L=65.49'CB=N01°51'37"WCD=65.48'
Δ=1°26'52"L=46.04'CB=N03°36'50"WCD=46.04'
17 18
12 1314
8 7
9 10
11 72
67 68
69 70
71 15
16 N88°09'56"E 106.47'
N88°09'56"E 107.53'
N88°09'56"E 111.36'
N88°09'56"E 113.17'
N88°09'56"E 112.95'
N78°12'20"E 123.80'61.15'62.65'
N00°40'45"W 98.70'
N00°40'45"W 86.91'
N89°19'15"E 92.81'N89°19'15"E 89.01'N89°19'15"E 138.32' N13°55'29"E 59.99'N40°28'00"W 48.23'
N77°04'46"E 98.16'
N47°23'14"E(R) 91.22'
N32°39'04"E(R) 112.26'
N01°28'42"W 99.62'
N14°12'00"E(R) 66.01'
N17°33'31"W 67.01'
N89°45'35"W 84.07'100.62'

74.05'N74°42'47"W13.23'

68.84'69.48'
8,118 SF12
8,404 SF136,740 SF14 5,355 SF8
5,708 SF7
6,338 SF9
6,013 SF10
6,634 SF117,082 SF15
7,255 SF16
6,577 SF72
6,794 SF70
6,746 SF71

60.00'

60.00'74.16'32.00'102.16'N89°19'15"E 134.16'N31°20'52"W 995.30'(OA) Δ=6°57'46"L=5.23'CB=N46°05'39"WCD=5.22'
N72°56'34"W(R)19.00'15.00'4.00'
Δ=32°28'29"L=22.10'CB=N33°17'40"ECD=21.81'Δ=45°03'57"L=30.68'CB=N18°54'50"WCD=29.89'N40°28'06"W(R)N48°33'12"E(R) S49°26'12"W(R)Δ=23°07'24"L=19.78'CB=N52°07'30"WCD=19.64' Δ=0°24'20"L=12.63'CB=N02°59'09"ECD=12.63'
N89°08'52"W(R)
S88°55'27"W(R)

52.81'40.00'N89°19'15"E 133.88'
R=26.00'Δ=91°44'23"L=41.63'CB=N44°48'34"WCD=37.32'40.00'49.01' S89°10'10"W(R)
S87°06'36"W(R)
R=26.00'Δ=95°22'49"L=43.28'CB=N43°21'09"ECD=38.45'R=1805.00'Δ=12°49'01"L=403.78'CB=N03°13'11"WCD=402.93'(OA) N40°25'28"E(R)22.00'R=39.00'Δ=166°33'43"L=113.38'CB=N79°39'43"WCD=77.46' R=338.00'Δ=25°16'15"L=149.08'
R=1822.00'Δ=5°23'53"L=171.66'
R=1784.00'Δ=12°49'01"L=399.08'CB=N01°38'19"WCD=171.59'
CB=N03°13'11"WCD=398.25'(OA)
10' P.U.E.
10' P.U.E.

SAWGRASS PLACE(PRIVATE)BANDON(PRIVATE)DUNESDRIVE
(PRIVATE)BETHPAGECOURT10' P.U.E.10' P.U.E.3.663±ACLOT L

3.663±ACLOT L

3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
N84°15'41"E(R) 5.61'17'17'
17'
17'21'
17'
21'
10' P.U.E.10' P.U.E.

N88°09'56"E 112.95'R=1805.00'Δ=12°49'01"L=403.78'
R=1784.00'Δ=12°49'01"L=399.08'
17'
21'
N88°09'56"E 118.68'
CB=N69°59'42"WCD=262.37'
R=376.00'Δ=40°50'20"L=268.00'
536.71'(OA)
N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)
69 17 18 19 20
74 73
6 LOT H
3 R=26.00' Δ=90°57'44" L=41.28'CB=N43°50'22"E CD=37.08' N67°03'48"E(R)N70°10'38"E(R)
N83°09'01"E(R)
N87°13'01"W(R)
R=233.00'Δ=69°56'40"L=284.44'
CB=N36°36'50"WCD=267.10'(OA)
R=271.00'Δ=69°22'38"L=328.14'
CB=N31°30'00"WCD=308.46'(OA)
6,684 SF74
6,362 SF737,714 SF6

2.783±ACLOT H
17'
21'
N27°04'53"E 101.92'
N00°40'45"W 17.00'N00°40'45"W 17.00'N87°31'55"W(R)

72.91'

21.00'
N00°40'45"W 93.91'

7.00'7.00'20.00'N89°19'15"E20.00'N89°19'15"E20.00'
17'21'40' PUE
Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4C5C6
Radius43.00'1805.00'1805.00'1805.00'250.00'250.00'
Delta66°37'58"3°53'23"8°12'24"0°43'14"106°30'16"84°55'38" Length50.01'122.54'258.54'22.70'464.71'370.56'
Chord BearingN16° 15' 33"WN07° 41' 01"WN01° 38' 07"WN02° 49' 42"EN50° 03' 49"WN39° 16' 30"W Chord Length47.24'122.51'258.32'22.70'400.64'337.56'

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

13.23'
Δ=1°55'55"L=60.15'CB=N05°53'50"WCD=60.15'
Δ=1°56'16"L=60.33'CB=N07°49'56"WCD=60.33'
Δ=8°48'03"L=57.75'CB=N61°44'58"WCD=57.70' Δ=8°48'03"L=57.75'CB=N70°33'01"WCD=57.70' Δ=8°48'03"L=57.75'CB=N79°21'04"WCD=57.70' Δ=6°39'46"L=43.72'CB=N87°04'59"WCD=43.70' R=1822.00' Δ=2°36'34" L=82.98'CB=N08°19'25"W CD=82.98' CB=N69°59'42"WCD=262.37'
Δ=1°55'42"L=60.04'CB=N03°58'02"WCD=60.04'
17 18
19 12
11 20
LOT G
66 67
68 6915
16 LOT F
N88°09'56"E 110.72'
N88°09'56"E 106.46'
N88°09'56"E 100.15'
N74°42'47"W 98.56'
N23°51'01"E(R) 95.26'N15°02'57"E(R) 90.01'N06°14'54"E(R) 95.87'75.55'72.10'72.20'97.91'N74°42'47"W 330.98'

51.46'
6,745 SF175,943 SF185,964 SF198,444 SF20
33,584 SFLOT G

1.195±ACLOT F
6,526 SF68
6,720 SF69
7,219 SF66
6,209 SF67
N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)
261.59'(OA)

89.61'

60.00'

60.00'
283.91'
Δ=0°49'39"L=25.76'CB=N09°12'53"WCD=25.76'Δ=6°55'24"L=35.16'CB=N06°10'00"WCD=35.14' S85°04'07"W(R)
S83°08'12"W(R)
S81°11'57"W(R)
N87°17'42"E(R)N84°28'35"E(R)
Δ=4°06'17"L=18.13'CB=N07°34'33"WCD=18.12'
Δ=49°20'21"L=217.87'CB=N19°08'46"ECD=211.20'Δ=46°31'15"L=236.27'CB=N20°33'19"ECD=229.84' R=257.00' Δ=9°43'08" L=43.59'CB=N38°57'22"E CD=43.54' R=270.00'Δ=53°26'39"L=251.85'
CB=N17°05'37"ECD=242.82'
R=376.00'Δ=40°50'20"L=268.00'
250' TRAMSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER 612 O.R. 53410' P.U.E. 10' P.U.E.BANDON(PRIVATE)DUNESDRIVE
10' P.U.E.N46°29'14"E(R) 4.00'
17'
17'
21'
17'21'
R=355.00'Δ=46°09'47"L=286.02'CB=N72°39'26"WCD=278.35'N32°39'04"E(R) 112.26' (PRIVATE)BETHPAGECOURT10' P.U.E.3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)N84°15'41"E(R) 5.61'17'21' N88°09'56"E 112.95'S86°59'50"W(R)70
16 12 11
CB=N03°13'11"WCD=402.93'(OA)
CB=N03°13'11"WCD=398.25'(OA)
R=1784.00'Δ=12°49'01"L=399.08'
N31°20'52"W 995.30'(OA)
N72°09'31"W 95.27'N55°54'12"W(R)N17°50'29"E 530.26'(OA) R=253.00'Δ=53°26'39"L=235.99'
CB=N17°05'37"ECD=227.53'
R=291.00'Δ=53°26'39"L=271.44'
CB=N17°05'37"ECD=261.70'
21 Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4
Radius22.00'26.00'1805.00'1805.00'
Delta46°54'06"36°29'38"8°12'24"3°53'23"
Length18.01'16.56'258.54'122.54'
Chord BearingN66° 57' 49"WN25° 15' 57"WN01° 38' 07"WN07° 41' 01"W Chord Length17.51'16.28'258.32'122.51'

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
N73°45'25"W 95.59'
Δ=1°08'24"L=60.03'CB=N00°03'33"ECD=60.03'
Δ=12°46'00"L=57.04'CB=N05°29'56"WCD=56.92'Δ=1°14'21"L=64.43'CB=N00°32'20"ECD=64.43'Δ=13°50'48"L=59.69'CB=N10°04'00"ECD=59.55' Δ=12°35'34"L=56.26'CB=N43°26'15"WCD=56.15' Δ=12°38'16"L=56.47'CB=N30°49'20"WCD=56.35' Δ=22°42'42"L=86.41'CB=N46°36'44"WCD=85.85'
Δ=12°34'26"L=56.18'CB=N56°01'15"WCD=56.07'
Δ=13°28'52"L=60.47'CB=N27°21'22"ECD=60.33'
Δ=15°47'37"L=60.37'CB=N29°47'31"ECD=60.18'
Δ=12°37'16"L=56.39'CB=N18°11'34"WCD=56.28'Δ=23°23'24"L=89.00'CB=N23°33'40"WCD=88.38' Δ=31°26'39"L=21.40'CB=N28°08'54"ECD=21.14'30
32 31
35 34
65 64
33 63
59 60
61 62
25 N72°09'31"W 95.27'
N72°26'29"W 106.29'
N72°09'31"W 54.33'
N38°40'29"E 109.22'
N52°26'36"E 162.36'
N54°44'37"E(R) 85.77'
N74°42'47"W 206.74'98.52' 102.70'5.52'
N65°09'18"E 119.27'
N77°51'59"E 95.46'
N88°09'56"E 90.29'N78°08'02"E(R) 83.83'
N25°34'38"W 54.03'
N88°09'56"E 85.65'
N17°50'29"E 219.89'N17°50'29"E 219.89'N17°50'29"E 530.26'(OA)

59.00'

59.50'

59.00'

46.56'

59.00'

55.33'
N55°54'12"W(R)
N78°15'29"W(R)
5,015 SF25
6,916 SF30
8,105 SF32
7,665 SF31
5,113 SF35
5,999 SF34
6,179 SF33
7,925 SF65
9,624 SF64
10,210 SF63
6,020 SF60
5,974 SF61
7,199 SF62

65.60'

73.88'

83.55'

95.84'
N52°18'40"W(R)Δ=6°07'37" L=23.42'CB=N40°45'08"ECD=23.41' N40°15'58"E(R)
N65°29'48"E(R)
N78°07'04"E(R)
S89°06'56"E(R)
R=22.00'Δ=84°12'11"L=32.33'CB=N20°12'23"WCD=29.50'
Δ=0°16'27"L=1.22'CB=N01°01'17"ECD=1.22'66.08'

50.68'62.60'

60.01'N00°33'31"W 187.63'(OA)
N17°50'29"E 146.06'65.66'

80.40'
R=209.00' Δ=6°05'58" L=22.25'CB=N14°47'30"E CD=22.24' R=209.00' Δ=9°16'52" L=33.85'CB=N07°06'05"E CD=33.82'R=43.00' Δ=10°46'43" L=8.09'CB=N33°33'34"W CD=8.08'

25.01'
194.88'
Δ=13°01'29"L=49.56'CB=N05°21'14"WCD=49.45'Δ=0°31'45"L=27.86'CB=N00°53'38"ECD=27.86'N89°22'14"W(R) R=235.00'Δ=72°19'31"L=296.64'
CB=N35°00'15"WCD=277.34'
N02°27'39"E 59.10'
R=230.00'Δ=15°22'50"L=61.74'
CB=N10°09'04"ECD=61.56'
R=240.00'Δ=25°58'28"L=108.80'
CB=N30°49'43"ECD=107.87'
CB=N30°34'29"WCD=269.29'
CB=N28°24'17"WCD=215.12'
R=218.00'Δ=59°07'35"L=224.97'
R=256.00'Δ=63°27'59"L=283.57'
10' P.U.E.
10' P.U.E.10' P.U.E.
10' P.U.E.
10' P.U.E.
10' P.U.E.

BANDON DUNES COURT(PRIVATE)

3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)TORREY PINES DRIVE(PRIVATE) 17'21'
21'17'
21'17'21'
17'21'
21' 17'21'R=3000.00'Δ=5°59'43"L=313.92'CB=N01°50'21"WCD=313.77'(OA)R=3017.00'Δ=5°59'43"L=315.70' CB=N01°50'21"WCD=315.55'(OA)R=2979.00'Δ=5°59'43"L=311.72' CB=N01°50'21"WCD=311.58'(OA)
N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)
LOT F
33,584 SFLOT G
29 36 59N61°49'48"E(R)N88°09'56"E 93.02'
N88°09'56"E 85.00'
S89°55'09"W(R)S89°29'21"W(R)
L1(R)
L2

3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
261.59'(OA)
N52°51'32"E(R)
N84°28'43"W 46.59'N74°42'47"W 42.34'
N15°17'13"E 47.18'64.93'C11 D.E.

N65°28'03"W 46.27'
21 22
23 24
27 26
28 N72°09'31"W 87.09'
N72°09'31"W 93.08'
N72°09'31"W 85.03'
N72°09'31"W 85.00'
N72°09'31"W 85.00'
N72°09'31"W 85.00'
N72°09'31"W 85.30'
N77°34'25"W(R)
5,301 SF21
5,016 SF22
5,015 SF23
5,015 SF24
5,440 SF27
5,183 SF26
28 Δ=0°51'05"L=3.67'CB=N17°24'56"ECD=3.67'
Δ=2°46'28"L=12.44'CB=N19°13'42"ECD=12.44'
N73°00'36"W(R)
N86°51'24"W(R)
N69°23'04"W(R) Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11 Radius257.00'219.00'26.00'22.00'247.00'49.00'39.00'43.00'45.00'209.00'291.00' Delta25°58'28"21°55'14"46°53'05"57°18'21"15°22'50"41°24'35"118°35'45"144°13'25"41°24'36"15°22'50"5°41'38" Length116.51'83.79'21.28'22.00'66.30'35.41'80.73'108.24'32.52'56.10'28.92' Chord BearingN30° 49' 43"EN32° 51' 20"EN81° 24' 38"WN46° 29' 39"EN10° 09' 04"EN23° 09' 56"EN15° 25' 39"WN33° 09' 47"EN18° 14' 38"WN10° 09' 04"EN40° 58' 08"E Chord Length115.51'83.28'20.69'21.10'66.11'34.65'67.07'81.84'31.82'55.94'28.91' Line TableLine #L1L2BearingN14° 51' 10"WN02° 27' 39"ELength4.00'0.90' N02°27'39"E0.90'R=247.00'Δ=0°40'57"L=2.94'CB=N02°48'07"ECD=2.94' N86°51'24"W(R)N72°09'31"W 93.08'
C6

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

LIMIT OF D.E.

D.E.

LIMIT OF D.E.D.E.

N77°34'25"W(R)
CB=N12°54'35"ECD=143.87'
R=53.00'Δ=59°20'04"L=54.89'CB=N75°36'27"ECD=52.47'
C2
C1 C3
C4
C5
Δ=2°00'11"L=7.41'CB=N48°25'30"ECD=7.41'
Δ=1°15'43"L=65.61'CB=N00°42'42"WCD=65.61'

43.47'N28°59'05"W(R) 26.00'
Δ=1°14'04"L=65.01'CB=N01°07'41"WCD=65.00'Δ=87°09'06"L=59.32'CB=N31°08'58"WCD=53.77' Δ=22°48'35"L=78.82'CB=N35°44'47"ECD=78.31'
Δ=1°15'45"L=65.65'CB=N03°14'09"WCD=65.65'
Δ=1°15'42"L=65.60'CB=N01°58'25"WCD=65.60'
Δ=16°28'41"L=67.87'CB=N09°23'01"ECD=67.64'
Δ=13°02'02"L=53.69'CB=N24°08'22"ECD=53.57'
Δ=0°58'11"L=50.42'CB=N04°21'07"WCD=50.42'
Δ=2°07'30"L=111.89'CB=S02°48'28"ECD=111.89'
LOT E
30 35
36 55
56 57
58 59
60 54
LOT I
29 38
37 40
39 LOT J
N15°16'29"E(R) 41.34'N44°03'35"W(R) 136.85'
N73°45'25"W 95.59'N88°09'56"E 93.02'
N88°09'56"E 94.30'
N88°09'56"E 94.14'
N88°09'56"E 85.00'
N88°09'56"E 85.65'N11°41'21"W 50.92'
N88°09'56"E 51.76'N86°06'37"W(R) 25.00'

65.30'
N88°09'56"E 92.54'
N88°09'56"E 90.32'
N88°09'56"E 103.48'N56°30'20"W 85.96'
N61°49'48"E(R)
497 SFLOT E
7,307 SFLOT I
5,538 SF368,826 SF29
8,727 SF37
8,784 SF38
5,993 SF39
6,319 SF55
6,828 SF56
6,134 SF57
7,025 SF54
6,189 SF58
6,152 SF59

60.00'

66.35'

75.00'

65.63'

65.60'

65.60'
S89°55'09"W(R)
S88°39'26"W(R)
S87°23'44"W(R)
S86°07'59"W(R)
S88°51'20"E(R)
S72°22'39"E(R)
Δ=5°58'53"L=24.64'CB=N01°50'46"WCD=24.63'
Δ=32°33'01"L=12.50'CB=S14°22'52"WCD=12.33'
N67°11'08"W 130.00'
N76°04'39"E 31.60'27.34'10.00'4.00'
126.85'

70.87'65.02'
N73°51'08"W (R)17.69'N82°25'52"E9.51'N11°10'27"E7.80'N78°49'33"W22.97'N82°25'52"E 80.24'64.49'15.75'R=112.00' Δ=30°04'13" L=58.78'CB=N01°06'45"E CD=58.11'N13°55'21"W 9.56' R=43.00' Δ=74°06'38" L=55.62'CB=N08°53'06"E CD=51.82'S89°29'21"W(R) S88°15'17"W(R)
N07°33'48"W 22.00'
S86°07'47"W(R)Δ=11°27'11"L=37.38'CB=N01°50'13"WCD=37.32' S65°39'30"E(R)S57°21'40"E(R)R=187.00'Δ=68°34'43"L=223.82' CB=N26°43'33"ECD=210.70'
R=187.00'Δ=57°07'32"L=186.44'
CB=N32°27'09"ECD=178.82'5,036 SFLOT JR=212.00'Δ=45°32'13"L=168.49' CB=N26°39'29"ECD=164.09' Δ=0°58'00"L=50.90'CB=N04°21'13"WCD=50.90' Δ=29° 10' 43" L=100.83'(OA)CB=N09°45'09"E' CD=99.75'Δ=28°44'58"L=106.38' CB=N18°15'52"E'CD=105.26'
Δ=14°47'04"L=54.70'CB=N40°01'53"ECD=54.55'
R=3000.00'Δ=5°59'43"L=313.92'
CB=N01°50'21"WCD=313.77'(OA)
R=236.00'Δ=35°29'36"L=146.20'
R=215.00'Δ=68°43'54"L=257.91'CB=N29°31'44"ECD=242.72'(OA) CB=N29°31'44"ECD=223.53'(OA)
R=198.00'Δ=68°43'54"L=237.52'
R=3017.00'Δ=5°59'43"L=315.70'
R=2979.00'Δ=5°59'43"L=311.72'CB=N01°50'21"WCD=315.55'(OA) CB=N01°50'21"WCD=311.58'(OA)
20' D.E.10'P.U.E.
15' P.S.D.E. 10' P.U.E.

10.00'
N78°49'33"W22.97'N78°49'33"W22.97'
10' P.U.E.10' P.U.E.
25' P.U.E. PER2583 O.R. 158
25' P.U.E. PER2583 O.R. 158

TORREY PINES DRIVE(PRIVATE)

3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
17'21'
21'17'
30 35 60
N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)
N17°50'29"E 530.26'(OA)
N41°24'06"W 92.29'4041 53
S42°50'55"E(R)S42°34'35"E(R)N49°25'36"E 51.04'N88°09'56"E 130.38'S88°06'22"W(R)

3.663±ACLOT L(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
N00°33'31"W 187.63'(OA)
N02°27'39"E 59.10'
R=213.00' Δ=0°37'27" L=2.32'CB=N61°19'39"E CD=2.32'L1 20' P.S.D.E.60.00'

38.00'N88°51'20"W(R)
27 28
N72°09'31"W 87.09'
7,971 SF28
27 Δ=5°58'53"L=20.67'CB=N01°50'46"WCD=20.66'
Δ=23°11'50"L=80.16'
CB=N12°44'35"ECD=79.62'
Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4C5
Radius39.00'43.00'43.00'22.00'215.00'
Delta118°35'45"59°20'04"144°13'25"67°02'24"43°31'09"
Length80.73'44.53'108.24'25.74'163.30'
Chord BearingN15° 25' 39"WN75° 36' 27"EN33° 09' 47"EN02° 51' 49"WN16° 55' 22"E Chord Length67.07'42.57'81.84'24.30'159.41'
Line TableLine #L1BearingN28° 59' 05"WLength3.41'

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERLYLIMIT OF D.E.

R=215.00'Δ=68°43'54"L=257.91'CB=N29°31'44"ECD=242.72'(OA) N14°54'15"W(R)10.50'(TIE)
C17(OA)
C12
C5C6C8
C9
C13
C4C1
C2 C3
C16
C15
C10C11Δ=35°15'13"L=46.76'CB=N48°34'20"ECD=46.03'

43.47'N28°59'05"W(R) 26.00'
R=236.00'Δ=14°08'55"L=58.28'CB=N56°49'14"ECD=58.13'
Δ=23°33'37"L=83.89'CB=N50°01'23"ECD=83.30' Δ=10°39'44"L=14.14'CB=N71°31'48"ECD=14.12' Δ=111°30'57"L=83.69'CB=N61°33'08"ECD=71.09'
Δ=13°46'44"L=58.20'CB=N40°44'45"ECD=58.06'
Δ=13°53'17"L=58.66'CB=N54°34'46"ECD=58.52'
Δ=14°26'08"L=45.85'CB=N54°25'17"ECD=45.73'
Δ=2°00'11"L=7.41'CB=N48°25'30"ECD=7.41'
Δ=16°44'36"L=57.86'CB=N55°31'23"ECD=57.66' Δ=13°56'28"L=53.77'CB=N29°24'47"WCD=53.64' Δ=15°59'31"L=61.68'CB=N14°26'47"WCD=61.48'
47 42
46 48
41 49
50 51
52 53
54 45

LOT DLOT C
40 39
43 44
LOT K
N88°09'56"E 130.38'
N88°09'56"E 101.67'
N88°09'56"E 88.24'
N88°09'56"E 88.74'
N88°09'56"E 90.63'
N88°09'56"E 68.69'N70°48'27"W 47.28'
N41°24'06"W 92.29'
N35°35'52"W 84.04'
N43°32'54"W 87.88'
N53°31'49"W 84.94'
N53°31'49"W 90.31'
N29°44'38"W(R) 80.88'
N33°38'26"W 116.41'
N51°47'13"W 119.39'
N58°08'59"W 101.13'
5,666 SF42
5,562 SF41
5,649 SF40
7,651 SF478,020 SF48
6,651 SF49
5,381 SF50
5,280 SF51
7,644 SF45
9,100 SFLOT D17,888 SFLOT C
5,298 SF43
7,587 SF44
1,301 S.F.LOT K
5,609 SF52
6,974 SF53

65.10'

70.00'

60.00'

60.00'
S88°06'22"W(R)
N67°33'28"E(R)
N83°32'58"E(R)
S38°51'30"E(R)
Δ=34°29'22"L=13.24'CB=N19°08'20"WCD=13.04'
N89°16'52"E 251.89'134.37'24.00'93.52'R=427.00' Δ=7°29'25" L=55.82'CB=N85°32'09"E CD=55.78' N00°43'08"W55.04'N00°43'08"W55.04'
S42°50'55"E(R)
N28°28'36"W(R)
N42°21'52"W(R)
N56°08'37"W(R)
S32°49'40"E(R)
S84°12'21"E(R)
N51°45'25"W(R)
N28°11'48"W(R)
S63°53'10"E(R)
N59°03'17"W(R)N23°48'04"W(R)S42°35'37"E(R)
N61°38'21"E 30.18'S42°34'35"E(R)
N60°48'47"W 159.67'81.34'

78.34'
N08°14'44"W 82.76'
N08°12'34"W(R)

27.42'

55.34'N81°45'16"E 5.83'
Δ=6°24'52"L=24.74'CB=N03°14'36"WCD=24.73'
Δ=51°10'40"L=49.13'CB=N25°33'10"ECD=47.51'
R=215.00'Δ=24°29'24"L=91.90'
CB=N48°00'40"ECD=91.20'
R=187.00'Δ=25°52'24"L=84.44'
CB=N48°42'09"ECD=83.73'
N35°45'58"E 52.56'
N49°25'36"E 51.04'Δ=2°22'17"L=10.02'CB=N62°42'33"ECD=10.02'N61°38'21"E 25.14'Δ=11°26'16"L=36.33'CB=N41°29'05"ECD=36.27' N42°47'47"W(R)
N35°45'58"E 37.00'N35°45'58"E 15.56'Δ=11°38'26"L=44.70'CB=N41°35'10"ECD=44.62' Δ=8°01'23"L=33.89'CB=N29°50'42"ECD=33.86'Δ=12°50'59"L=49.34'CB=N53°49'52"ECD=49.24' R=39.00'Δ=119°51'44"L=81.59'
CB=N02°45'32"WCD=67.50'
R=43.00' Δ=140°07'33" L=105.16'CB=N47°14'50"E CD=80.85'Δ=28°36'36"L=21.47'CB=N08°30'39"WCD=21.25' Δ=5°04'40"L=18.08'CB=N35°42'15"ECD=18.07'
R=100.00'Δ=73°18'58"L=127.96'
CB=N45°05'47"ECD=119.41'
R=76.00'Δ=68°25'22"L=90.76'
CB=N42°38'59"ECD=85.46'
R=172.00'Δ=37°00'56"L=111.12'
CB=N17°21'25"WCD=109.20'
Δ=55°38'26"L=97.11'CB=N53°56'03"ECD=93.34'
Δ=17°40'32"L=30.85'CB=N17°16'34"ECD=30.73'
N76°08'20"W(R) 4.36'
R=225.00'Δ=50°02'01"L=196.48'
CB=N38°52'40"ECD=190.30' R=200.00'Δ=77°31'41"L=270.62'
CB=N06°11'42"WCD=250.45'
R=187.00'Δ=34°40'41"L=113.18'
CB=N11°57'43"WCD=111.46'
R=51.00'Δ=137°56'26"L=122.78'
CB=N06°07'32"ECD=95.21'
R=26.00'Δ=62°07'33"L=28.19'CB=N31°46'55"WCD=26.83'R=22.00'Δ=62°07'33"L=23.85'CB=N30°20'38"ECD=22.70' R=221.00'Δ=36°20'52"L=140.20'CB=N18°12'35"WCD=137.86'
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E.

SOUTHERN HILLS COURT
(PRIVATE)

12.5' P.U.E. PER2583 O.R. 158

TORREY(PRIVATE)PINESCOURT

3.663±ACLOT L

SHASTA STREET
(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
(P.U.E., E.A.E.)
21'13'21'17'21'
17'21' 13' N01°50'04"W 2222.53'(OA)
CB=N29°31'44"ECD=223.53'(OA)
R=198.00'Δ=68°43'54"L=237.52'
Δ=2°05'29"L=7.45'CB=S62°50'57"WCD=7.45'
R=55.00' Δ=61°26'34" L=58.98'CB=N30°41'08"E CD=56.20'

5.00'75.88'
39 54
N27°18'36"E(R) 15.19'

11.19'4.00'
C7L1(R)
C14
N00°02'09"W 106.18'

10.86'60.03'35.30'21'
ROW2
R=213.00' Δ=0°37'27" L=2.32'CB=N61°19'39"E CD=2.32'
FOUND 3/4" REBAR, NO TAG, IN FENCE POST FOOTING2.00' FOOT SOUTH. HELD FOR NORTH / SOUTH LINE.

FOUND 5/8"REBAR/CAP "LS5109", NO RECORD.

FOUND 3/4" REBAR,NO TAG

7.57'L2
N02°38'13"W(R)
Δ=22°30'25"L=29.85'CB=N19°41'31"ECD=29.66'
S51°19'04"E(R) R=215.00'N45°02'27"E(R) R=200.00'
N35°45'58"E 52.56'
7,575 SF46
N57°25'52"W2.95'N14°54'15"W(R)40.50'(TIE)
LOT J Line TableLine #L1L2BearingN15° 25' 59"EN28° 59' 05"WLength4.00'3.41'Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15C16C17 Radius242.00'49.00'45.00'204.00'22.00'22.00'22.00'26.00'22.00'30.00'45.00'55.00'215.00'215.00'220.00'182.00'212.00' Delta38°03'41"31°20'20"55°58'52"30°43'47"55°41'13"37°37'01"18°04'12"45°15'57"67°02'24"75°42'36"69°43'07"10°15'54"25°12'45"43°31'09"24°29'25"25°52'24"45°32'13" Length160.76'26.80'43.97'109.41'21.38'14.44'6.94'20.54'25.74'39.64'54.76'9.85'94.61'163.30'94.04'82.19'168.49' Chord BearingN44° 51' 51"EN41° 30' 10"EN05° 10' 29"EN48° 31' 48"EN77° 35' 23"EN68° 33' 16"EN83° 36' 07"WN51° 56' 02"WN02° 51' 49"WN39° 00' 21"EN40° 14' 11"EN56° 16' 27"EN51° 17' 19"EN16° 55' 22"EN48° 00' 40"EN48° 42' 09"EN26° 39' 29"E Chord Length157.82'26.47'42.24'108.11'20.55'14.19'6.91'20.01'24.30'36.82'51.44'9.84'93.85'159.41'93.32'81.49'164.09'

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

DUNESDRIVE

DIAMOND OAKS ROAD

DUNESCOURT

SHASTA STREET

TORREYPINESDRIVE

TORREY PINESCOURT
47 LOT E
30 32
31 3536
34 42
6564
46 48
33 171819
121314 8
7 91011
20 41
55 63
72 56
LOT G
49 57
66 50
58 67
51 59
68 52
60 69
53 61
70 54
62 71
4 1516
LOT F
25 LOT I29
38 45 LOT DLOT C
37 4039LOT J
4344
LOT K
44 171819121314879101120
4155
63 72
56 LOT G
49 57
66 50
58 67
51 59
68 5247
LOT E303231353634
42 6564
4648
3360
69 53
61 70
54 62
71 4
1516
LOT F
25 LOT I29
38 45LOT DLOT C
37 4039LOT J
4344LOT K

BAY HILL COURT

DUNESDRIVE

DIAMOND OAKS ROADWHISTLINGSTRAITS DRIVE

SAWGRASS PLACE

BETHPAGE COURT

BANDONDUNESCOURT

SHASTA STREET

TORREYPINESDRIVE

TORREY PINESCOURTSOUTHERNHILLSCOURT
BANDON
7475
736
5 LOT H
2 LOT B
3 1
LOT A
ROW2
ROW11 523LOT H7475736
LOT B
21222324
2726
28 21222324262728
LOT A**** ********
*********
******

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR INFORMATIONALPURPOSES ONLY PURSUANT TO SECTION 66434.2OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE DENOTES SEWER BACKFLOW PREVENTER VALVE REQUIRED ON SANITARY SEWERCONNECTION BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT ANDMAINTAINED THEREAFTER BY THE OWNER.LEGEND* SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, REFERENCES, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND LEGEND Sierra View Country Club Vicinity Map
Development Services
S:\Arcdata\WLewis\Map Requests\A_Department Requests\SierraView_VicinityMap\SierraViewCC_VicinityMap\SierraViewCC_VicinityMap.aprx Date Saved: 9/21/2023 2:43 PM

FOOTHILLS
WILLS
TAYLOR
BERRY

HARDING

WASHINGTON

HALLISSY

RESERVE
VERNON
GIBSON

ROSEVILLE
MAIN
CHURCH

LINCOLN

SUNRISE

JUNCTION

YOSEMITE
FOLSOM

ATKINSON

ATLANTIC

PLEASANT GROVE
SHASTA

GALLERIA

LEAD HILL
I80
HWY 65
EUREKA
[
SITE
0 2,0001,000
Feet
RESOLUTION NO. 23-414

APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SVCC 75, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and SVCC 75, LLC, for the Sierra View Country Club Subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2994
File #:
0400-04-09-1
Title:

Sierra Vista Torrente - Phase 1 Project - Notice of Completion Contact:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista
Torrente - Phase 1
,
CWJ#190712
as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Andrew Druck, Sr. Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-413
NOC
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-413

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA TORRENTE – PHASE 1 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Torrente – Phase 1 is hereby approved, and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book GG of Maps, Page 46 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2991
File #:
0400-04-09-1
Title:

Sierra Vista Torrente - Phase 2 Project - Notice of Completion Contact:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.14.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista
Torrente - Phase 2
,
CWJ#190754
as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Andrew Druck, Sr. Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-410
NOC
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-410

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA TORRENTE – PHASE 2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Torrente – Phase 2 is hereby approved, and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book GG of Maps, Page 47 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, day of , this 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

___________________________________

City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2989
File #:
0400-04-09-1
Title:

Sierra Vista Torrente - Phase 3 Project - Notice of Completion Contact:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista
Torrente - Phase 3
,
CWJ#190755
as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Andrew Druck, Sr. Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-408
NOC
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-408

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA TORRENTE – PHASE 3 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Torrente – Phase 3 is hereby approved, and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book GG of Maps, Page 48 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

___________________________________

City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2990
File #:
0400-04-09-1
Title:

Creekview Westbrook Boulevard Segment 4 - Notice of Completion Contact:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441
[email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Creekview Westbrook Boulevard Segment 4, CWJ # 190666, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-409
NOC
Exhibit A: Location Map
Final Map

RESOLUTION NO. 23-409

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CREEKVIEW WESTBROOK BOULEVARD SEGMENT 4 PROJECT, APPROVING THE " NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGIN EER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTIC E ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Creekview Westbrook Boulevard Segment 4 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right -of-way and easements offered for dedication on the fin al map of Creekview Phase 3 Large Lot Subdivision recorded in Book FF of Maps, Page 84, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Creekview Westbrook Boulevard Segment 4.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 18th day of October 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

___________________________________

City of Roseville

HOLT PW
W
E
S
T
B
R
O
O
K
B
L
B
E
N
C
H
M

A R K D R
Exhibit A : Location Map
City of Roseville
Creekview
Westbrook Boulevard
Segment 4
Project
Location
0 0.50.25
Miles
B L U
E

O A K S
S
A
N
T
U
C
C
I

WESTBROOK

FIDDYMENT

P L E A S A N T G R O
V
E
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2986
File #:
0400-04-09-1
Title:

Creekview Blue Oaks Boulevard Segment 5 - Notice of Completion Contact:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441
[email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.17.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Creekview Blue Oaks Boulevard Segment 5, CWJ # 190761, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact on the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-406
NOC
Exhibit A: Location Map
Final Map

RESOLUTION NO. 23-406

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CREEKVIEW BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD SEGM ENT 5 PROJECT, APPROVING THE " NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGIN EER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTIC E ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Creekview Blue Oaks Boulevard Segment 5 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right -of-way and easements offered for dedication on the fin al map of Creekview Phase 1 Large Lot Subdivision recorded in Book EE of Maps, Page 97, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Creekview Blue Oaks Boulevard Segment 5.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 18th day of October 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

___________________________________

City of Roseville

OWNER'S STATEMENT

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY

RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN UPON THIS FINAL MAP OF "CREEKVIEW • PHASE 1 LARGE LOT SUBDNISION" AND

THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS FINAL MAP AND

HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS IRREVOCABLY OFFERED FOR DEDICATION AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
(A) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF, BUT NOT LIMITED

TO ELECTROLIERS, WATER AND GAS PIPES, SEWER AND DRAINAGE PIPES, AND FOR

UNDERGROUND WIRE AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE ANO TELEVISION

SERVICES AND TRAFFIC CONTROL APPURTENANCES TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL

APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS ALL THOSE AREAS SHOWN HEREON AS I00/ROW (IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION/RIGHT OF

WAY) AND THOSE STRIPS OF LAND LYING CONTIGUOUS TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "P.U.E." (PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT). (8) A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN I BICYCLE ACCESS AND THE INSTALLATION,

REPAIR, REMOVAL OR REPLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPING TOGETHER WITH ANY ANO ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 22 ANO 23, AND THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "PASEO EASEMENT" (P.E.).
(C) A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR THE INGRESS ANO EGRESS OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES,

TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER AND

ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LANO SHOWN HEREON ANO DESIGNATED EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT (E.V.A.E.).
(D) A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A BUS SHELTER

TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER AND ACROSS THAT STRIP OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "BUS SHELTER EASEMENT" (B.S.E.).
(E) A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLES ACCESS AND THE INSTALLATION

AND MAINTENANCE OF THE BIKE PATH, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL

APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER AND ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON ANO DESIGNATED "BIKE PATH EASEMENT" (B.P.E.). (F) A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE PURPOSE OF

CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES

THERETO RELATED TO A STANDARD CITY OF ROSEVILLE PUBLIC STREET ON, OVER,

UNDER, AND ACROSS BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD, WESTBROOK BOULEVARD, LOWER

BANK DRIVE AND CLOUD DANCE DRIVE SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT" (C.E.).

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS IRREVOCABLY OFFERED FOR DEDICATION IN FEE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
(A) AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD, BENCHMARK DRIVE, CLOUD DANCE

DRIVE, DAYDREAM DRIVE, GRASSCREEK DRIVE, HOLT PARKWAY, LOWER BANK DRIVE,

SKIPPING STONE WAY, WESTBROOK BOULEVARD AND WHISTLING BEND WAY, AND ALL

THOSE AREAS SHOWN HEREON AS IOD/ROW (IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION/RIGHT OF WAY).
(B) LOTS 28 AND 29 SHOWN HEREON TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PURPOSES.
(C) LOTS 15 AND 18 SHOWN HEREON TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES.
(D) LOT 21 SHOWN HEREON TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR A SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION SITE.
(E) LOT 26 SHOWN HEREON TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR RECYCLING CENTER SITE. (F) LOT 27 SHOWN HEREON TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR WATER TREATMENT/WELL SITE.

ANTHEM UNITED CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY

THE IDENTITY OF THE INDNIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STA TE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTYOF fL6,tt~
ON ~fl,\\., \S-1\1 t-01.O BEFORE ME, lfl(\~i C. \(.e\ti ,ANOTARYPUBLIC PERsONALLvAPPEAReo - 8v-i tA\'\ Moovt

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(J) WHOSE NAME(~ IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/8I IE/'FI l&-Y EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/I leMI IEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY~, AND THAT BY HIS/1,ff!Ml'f!!:IR SIGNATURE{$') ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(rl}, OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(t) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS __ __._~_,.\.A_,_,_c,.tYl.. ______________ COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ~ I 1, \ (1,~1, \ MY COMMISSION NUMBER: ....:"Z.::..:l...,1\.-1..._T'-'W._.\'---- f. ()f aufo9-~•~ ~kf 111€ ·- i~
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT SECTION 664 77.5 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66477.5 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SHALL RECONVEY LOTS 21, 26 AND 27 AS DEDICATED HEREON, TO THE SUBDIVIDER NAMED BELOW IF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE MAKES A DETERMINATION THAT THE SAME PUf3LIC

PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE PROPERTY WAS DEDICATED DOES NOT EXIST, OR THE PROPERTY

OR ANY PORTION THEREOF IS NOT NEEDED FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES EXCEPT FOR ANY

PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS REQUIRED FOR THE SAME PUBLIC PURPOSE OR PUBLIC UTILITIES.

SUBDIVIDER: ANTHEM UNITED CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ADDRESS: 3001 DOUGLAS BLVD., SUITE 200
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD

SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND

LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF ANTHEM UNITED CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, IN JANUARY, 2019, I HEREBY STATE THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND

COMPLETE AS SHOWN, THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER ANO OCCUPY

THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2022, ANO THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENl TO ENABLE

THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED, ANO THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.

MACKAY & SOMPS CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.

BY· 8,.J~
PA~L FERGUSON, J;., ;92
EXPIRATION DATE: MARCH 31, 2022
DATE: _Lf-_•/-=3_•;:l.,O ____ _
SEE SHEET 2 FOR TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
BOOK ~E OF MAPS, PAGE 97

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP OF "CREEKVIEW- PHASE 1 LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION" AND FIND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE MAP ON FILE AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

MARC STOUT, R.C.E. 69879
DATE:_~.J..J../4~"~/....,%-=..0=----

CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
LICENSE EXPIRES: SEPTEMBER 30, 2020
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THIS FINAL MAP OF "CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1 LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION" IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.

FOR MARC STOUT, CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
~ DATE -f;/4«/bO
TIMOTHYG. ~ ~~ .

EXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 2021

CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ROSEVILLE, HAS APPROVED THIS FINAL MAP OF "CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1 LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION", BUT REJECTS AT THIS TIME ON

BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC, BUT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT AT A LATER DATE, ALL

IRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THOSE

OFFERS, AND HEREBY APPROVES THE ABANDONMENT OF THE EASEMENT LISTED HEREON WITHIN NOTE 3 ON SHEET 2.

CITY CLERK, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
DATE: ~ (It>/ 1.02..0 BY: ___________ _

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

RECORDER'S STATEMENT
FILED THIS ___ DAY OF ______ __,.~ 2020, AT ___ .M. IN BOOK __ OF MAPS, AT PAGE __ __. IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, AT THE REQUEST OF MACKAY & SOMPS CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.

DOCUMENT No.4'4iO -(7)6103</
FEE:$ lel6CO

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDMSION Of RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050338, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER Of SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034771, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIACICAY& 5anPI APRIL 2020
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SUltYEYORI
1025~Ridge0nve, Suite 150, Roseville, CA95678 (916)n:l-1189 SHEET 1 OF 15 18431.RST

TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, A NEBRASKA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED ON MAY 2-4, 2019, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-3-4783,

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, AGAINST THE LANO HEREIN SHOWN CONSENTS TO THE MAKING AND FILING OF THIS MAP.

BY:

BY:--------------

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY

THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF :Pl :Ce,< C. Cc v::

ON A,-ri l '"·•2:D:1.Q BEFORE ME, V. "1 wpby . A NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED A 12 It,· n :0 i e,.i-D
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(lf) WHOSE NAM~IS/AjlE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT ~SHE/T~ EXECUTED THE SAME IN t1JS/HER/TH~ AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(lp8), AND THAT BY ~/HERITH9'R SIGNATURE~ ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(Sf, OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON{Sl ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
(J.-w...<,,~

SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS_J1..&...f-~.., .... -C..,.<~,e.~V~ ________ COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: l)er . i,q 12 Q:Z,."l,, MY COMMISSION NUMBER: ¢..\, l« q -.JlL, NOTES:

1. AU CURVES ARE DIMENSIONED WITH RADIUS, DELTA, ARC LENGTH, CHORD BEARING ANO CHORD LENGTH. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF AND ARE "GROUND" DISTANCES. DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF INDNIOUAL DIMENSIONS MAY NOT EQUAL THE OVERALL DIMENSION.

2. TOTAL AREA FOR THIS SUBDIVISION IS 461.327± ACRES, CONSISTING OF 18 LARGE LOTS, 1 COMMERCIAL LOT, 7 LANDSCAPE LOTS, 2 PUBLIC PARK LOTS, 2 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE LOTS , 1 CITY SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION LOT, 1 CITY RECYCLING CENTER LOT AND 1 CITY WATER TREATMENT/WELL LOT.

3. PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66434(G), THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC EASEMENT IS HEREBY ABANDONED:
a. HIGHWAY EASEMENT DEED TO THE COUNTY OF PLACER RECORDED IN BOOK 3841, AT PAGE 544, O.R.P.C., LYING WITHIN LOTS 6 AND 7, AND BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD.

4. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 35702, IN BOOK 2431, AT PAGE 645, O.R.

5. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF A REPORT OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION, SUBDMSIONS NO. P-75146, FOR THE PAYMENT OF FEES TO RELIEVE OVERCROWDING OF SCHOOL SERVING THE AREA RECORD ON MARCH 5, 1990 IN BOOK 3841, AT PAGE 538, O.R.

6. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE THE TERMS ANO PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND GRANITE BAY INVESTORS 11, LLC, PHILLIPS ROAD 160 INVESTORS

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PHILLIPS ROAD LAND, LLC, J & KD ENTERPRISES, LLC, SOULE

INVESTMENTS, LLC, BENNETT WEST ROSEVILLE, LLC, DECOU WEST ROSEVILLE, LLC,

BLUE OAKS - ROSEVILLE, LP, AND CHUANG RELATIVE TO THE CREEKVIEW SPECIFIC PLAN" RECORDED ON NOVEMBER 28, 2012 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2012-0113752, O.R. AND THE SUBSEQUENT ASSIGNMENTS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
a. THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" FROM

CHUANG FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP, FELIX CHUANG AND MARK

CHUANG TO ANTHEM UNITED CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED ON MARCH 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0015249. O.R.
b. THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" FROM PHILLIPS ROAD 160 INVESTORS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TO ANTHEM

UNITED CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0015249. 0.R. c. THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" FROM

PHILLIPS ROAD LANO, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, SOULE

INVESTMENTS, UC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ANO J & KEO

ENTERPRISES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, TO ANTHEM UNITED

CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED ON MARCH 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034780 O.R. d. THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" FROM

BENNETT WEST ROSEVILLE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND DECOU

WEST ROSEVILLE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, TO ANTHEM UNITED

CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED ON MARCH 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034781 O.R. e. THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" FROM

BLUE OAKS-ROSEVILLE, LP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TO ANTHEM UNITED

CREEKVIEW DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED ON MARCH 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034782 O.R.

7. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES, RENTS AND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS" RECORDED MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034784, O.R.

BASIS OF BEARINGS:

THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS N 89°30'20" E AS
SHOWN ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 14 PER THAT CERTAIN
FINAL MAP ENTITLED "WESTPARK - PHASE 4 LARGE LOT
SUBDIVISION" FILED FOR RECORD ON AUGUST 16, 2013 IN BOOK CC OF MAPS, AT PAGE 53, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS.

REFERENCES:
(1) DOC.# 2019-0050337 (LLA)
(2
3 ) 9 R.S. 56
( ) 17 P.M. 102
~
4 5
) 18 R.S. 15
) 18R.S. 64
6) BBMAPS88
(7) CC MAPS 53
(8) EE MAPS 51
BOOK e6' OF MAPS, PAGE '17
LEGEND:
0 AC.

BN0Y
B.P.E.

B.S.E.

C.E.

ESMT
E.V.A.E.

FD
1O0/ROW
I.P.

LLA
00 (OA)
O.R.

P.E.

PGE
P.M.

P.U.E.

R.S.
(R)
S.F.

DIMENSION POINT

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED

FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTED

FOUND QUARTER CORNER AS NOTED
SET 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 9265"

SET COPPERWELD SURVEY MONUMENT WITH CENTER PUNCH
IN MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "LS 9265"
ACRES

BOUNDARY

BIKE PATH EASEMENT

BUS SHELTER EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT

EASEMENT

EMERGENCY VAEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT
FOUND

IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION/RIGHT-OF-WAY

IRON PIPE

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT

OUTSIDE DIAMETER

OVERALL

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY

PASEO EASEMENT

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

PARCEL MAP

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

RECORD OF SURVEY

RADIAL BEARING

SQUARE FEET

SHEET INDEX

BOUNDARY

LOT LINE

ADJACENT PROPERTY

RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT/1.O.D.

EASEMENT/1.O.D.

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

EUGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
1025 Clteklide Rldgellme, Suite 150, Rose.tile, CA 95678 {916) n:1·1189 SHEET 2 OF 15 18431.RST FOUND 3/4" REBAR WITH
NO TAG. ACCEPTED AS

NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SECTION 14, T .11 N.,
R.5E. (2)(3)(4)(5)
NOTHING FOUND OR SET.

QUARTER SECTION CORNER

WAS ESTABLISHED BY

SINGLE PROPORTION PER
I
l LOT 1
lAMORUSO RANCH PHASE
l EE MAPS 51
I
I
I
l FOUND 2-1/4" I.P. WITH 2-1/2"
1 FOUND 1" 1.P. WITH ALUMINUM DISK STAMPED

DESIGNATED REMAINDER
AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1
EE MAPS 51
l PLASTIC CAP STAMPED AS SHOWN PER (2)(8).
! "P.L.S. 7579" PER (4) \ (N89"33'06"E 2639.76')(8)
FOUND 314" REBAR WITH
DAMAGED/ILLEGIBLE 1-1/2"
ALUMINUM CAP 0.03' SOUTH
AND 0.05' EAST OF

NORTHEAST CORNER OF

20.038 ACRE PARCEL PER (2)
FOUND 314" REBAR WITH NO
TAG 2.0' WEST OF BARBED

WIRE FENCE AT THE

NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SECTION 14, T.11N., R.5E. PER
(2)(3)(7)(8)
I (N89"57'51 "E 2639. 701(2)
1 11 N89"33'07"E 2639.7 '
- - - - -4~---.;....:;=-.::::.1~~~-------ftlr-659~1>---!:.~~65~9."!'!95~'(1~)- ... -- - ---i319.89'(1>- - - -14 (~:~~) (659.93')(2) (659.92')(2) (1319.85')(2) t ~ DESIGNATED REMAINDER 1
-- 3: '° C' <O I .... (') !:!:! a, x" ~ ~ AMORUSO RANCH -- > .... ,- .... :-- ~ i iS ~ :3 ~ ~ ~ m PHASE 1 co ,
~~ ~ v, o ~ ~ i~ EE MAPS 51 ~;.. 1
..... ~ (.) i I ... ;:: • - (')I
FOUND 314• REBAR WITH 1-1/2" ;!= l'-1 8 ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ FOUND 314" REBAR WITH 1-1/2" ~ ~ LOT32
2 ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "L.S. ~ ~ !::: a.. ~ ~ ..- ~ ij ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "LS. ~ .... 1 3731" 0.09' NORTH AND 0.03' EAST t ~- ;, ~0...1 oz·. ~-~ ~ ~ 3731" 0.11' EAST AND 0.06' c I ~ - OF SOUTHWEST CORNER OF z ~ ;:; w ~ z ;.. ~ SOUTH OF SOUTHEAST l-=- ~e.

CRE PARCEL PER (2) •g .... ~ CORNER OF 20.038 ACRE ~ ~$ = ==._ -:_;~ ,..__ ~ 20.038 A i g ... , z PARCEL PER (2) :j ; i "'~~ ........ ~ ►~~~~~"J :..~~; N89°33'01"E 1320.29' (1320.28')(10) ; f ~ N89°33'01"E 660.13' M • ~~ I I ~N ~ ~ ~ (N89"57'58"E 660.15')(2) / I ,... ..- ,::
~ ..... ~ l5
~ ~ BENCHMARK DRIVE 1 ;__ ~ ~
LOT31
"l ~ 48' I O D /ROW / WESTBROOK BOULEVARD -...;:::,... l . . . . . . I ---= ~ .:::;- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I , .J 125' 1.O.D./R.O.W. -----•----~ -Y I LOT33
~ / z ~ ✓, // WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
'J & 100' 1.O.0./R.O.W.
/ .M "
/ / ~'~
/ / "-:::! ~
a::: w
0 z -00
~00
WV)
a::: Cl.
o<(
w ::::!:
~m zm
(!)
(./)
w
0 (2)(3M<l 15! ~
--(')
LOT29
/ / ,;;:~ HOLTPARKWAY
/ / ~:,... r48' 1.O.O./R.0.W.
/ / ~____, ---1--------
/ / ..... t - N89°32'56"E 660.1
// / / (N89"5T32"E 660.37')(3) FOUND 'l!' I.P. WITH 2-318" IRON CAP STAMPED "AS
SHOWN PER(2)(3)(7)(8)
!2-~~-· ~f;-::::..,
;i1;1
ff w ~:

UU!
I
I
'-

1..,~
,-...N
•Ii ,~
I
I
I
)' / OUND 3/4• 1
/ A. REBAR WITH NO 1' /. / WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
/ '/ 100' 1.0.D./R.O.W. TAG
/ LOT30 I
I
(2643.24')(2)(3) 2643.19'(7) 3964.76' BNOY f ! 1 \
N89°30'20"E 5286.39'(7)(BASIS OF BEARINGS)
WESTPARK-PHASE 4 (S89°54'55-W 5286.48')(2)(3) \ \ 1-.:.::.::+j --+,--+! -- ! 1 1 FOUND 2" OD PIPE WITH
LOT 1 -A · 1 1 ! CAP (BENT) STAMPED
~:-~:~·-_:: ________ -r ___________ _j ! ! Al SHOWN ~R (2)(3)(8? __ I I l----7 I I. .- I I -----
--- ' I I I I J I
-~ ' I I I I I I I
I
I
I
..... - 1-~ :1a;
~(')
..-- ..--
~i ~,::-.. _ .. ,ta "?
ii
N
•ii <(O
..-
,~~ f~
....J w. .,...; u::::!: N~ 0:: a.: 1P -(') .....
~g <(
i:-i ~~
Cl. ,-....
..- ~-
2643.20'(7) (2643.24')(2)(3)
CllY OF -1-' --+-':-----..

ROSEVILLE,
I
FOUND3/4" 1
REBARWITH l
NOTAG i
I
I
I
I
I
11 1-...

I I I'-...
-l l- 40' ACCESS
l i EASEMENT PER~
I l 2010 O.R. 88 ·,
I I i ',, .............
11 I ', ---! I ! ............ _ ---
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND BOOK er;, OF MAPS, PAGE t::t7
LARGE L.L.T.M. S.L.T.M.

LOT# PLAN# PLAN#
1 C-41 C-41
2 C-42 C-42
3 C-25 C-25
4 LC-1 LC-1
5 LC-2 LC-2
6 LC-10 LC-10
7 LC-11 LC-11
8 C-70 C-70
9 C-17 C-17
10 LC-12 LC-12
11 C-24 C-24
12 C-23 C-23
13 C-13 C-13
14 C-14 C-14
15 C-63 C-63
16 C-15 C-15
17 C-12 C-12
18 C-62 C-62
19 C-11 C-11
20 C-10 C-10
21 C-82 C-82
22 LC-3 LC-3
23 LC-4 LC-4
24 C-16 C-16
25 C-43 C-43
26 C-83 C-83
27 C-84 C-84
28 C-54 C-54
29 C-53 C-53
30 - -
31 - -
32 - -
33 - -
N
0 250 500 1000
SCALE: 1 "•500'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDMSION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 ANO 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034771, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIIACICAY. SIIIPS APRIL 2020
~IEERI PLANNERS SURVEYORS
1 Cleekoide Ridge Drive. Suite 150, -· CA 95678 (916) TT3-1189 SHEET 3 OF 15 18431.RST w --' IX) ..J
ooGJ I en
-0 oo::
- ---- -- -- -------- ------ --- -- ---------------------- --- - ---~---------- BOOK GG: OF MAPS, PAGE _____ _
SEE SHEET 7 -~- ~
I ,-
0 LOT 12 29' I ;.. LOT 11 ~
4 ~ N
396.19'
LOT1

4.272:tAC
N89°51'01"E
--------------------
795.39' I ..-t-----------------,--~~--,-~--------------; W I Q I-... N89°51'01"E 763.76' ~ I 0::

I 9'~ i§l £ <(>
.~ ~ s· I I w
~w....,. ', ~ 1 ; 55• I s~
a:(.) I lb I -' - ~ I g~ ~~ I ~ I ----SEE DETAIL •49• ON I ~ I ~q 409.20' --,--
1 I
I
I
I
I
l
I
LOT2

4.330:tAC
~~ : "" u, J THIS SHEET ., ' ZE '1 ii
og 1 < o - ~ G0 1-
00::::>....J~ I, !II i ~ 7 ~~lJ.c ~ '1 ~ 65' J _.......see DETAIL "4A" ON ~ :> .... t 29' _,,,,.,r THIS SHEET z
1 IX)
It-
1 g
I
(.) / ff 7 LOT 5 --+--£ ~ Ii
11 1 _ 1.098:tAC § ~, ,
1 fs!. P.E./P.U.E. -~
~ J
00' LOT 4 (I.O.D./R.O.W.} 65'
' R=3900.00' R=4100. 28 473 SF m I
A=02•13•09• 4=02°13'09" , · · N
, M 06, L=158.80' P.E./P.U.E. 20' 20• B s E 81
a, ao GD L=151. (10D/ROW) X . . . z 8' i I::: CB=N88.23'45"E CB=N88.23'45"E . . . . . . ' 55' ~ I L3 CO=151.05' CD=158.79' 65' I
,Z 26' N02"11'54"W~j , I I 14.19' :)
N06°02'00"E 120.70' I

22.5' P.E./P.U.E.--18
____ .[50'P.E./P.U.E. _________ J ~
I
I
I
I
~
' '
I 3·85' ,----121.89' 138.48' 6().&3 -46.64• v'l, I
396.20' 370.36' cP 1 ~ 0.r . C4 ca NS1•54•oa-w N88°33'02"E •0735 ro 120·00 _ L 1 _ I rg • 766-56' BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD · .~ ~ R=4000.00' ~ R=4ooo.oo· , co ~ • , 18• , 1 ~ 824_40, {l.O.O./R.OW./C.E.) ~ I 81 _60, tt=o 2•13•0~ L=15~93' 4==~2°13'0~ L=15~~ _________ -, ___ N89 30~ E808..:75(0A)_-.- ____ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---0- - - -o-- ca-N88•23,45.e -o- CB=N8a0 23•45•e 504.52 10 304.23'(0A) _ S N89"30'20"E 906.01' R=4050.00' ll=00°58'50" L=69.30' fi.l CD=154. 92' CD=154.92' f8 ~ f8 1 , ! 18 g 906.31' CB=N89·00'55"E CD=69.30' N89"25'40"E 300.00' N85•43•s1-w 120.42' N89•30•20-e 220.00' 81.25' t- 78.34' FOUND 1" I.P. WITH

PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED "P.L.S.
7579" PER (4)
- :;'01;);; - -,
R:=21.00' b.=72"39'31" L=26.63' I
CB=N36"28'44"W CD=24.88'
72°48'29"W(R) 6.56' I
89°51'01"E 17.00' I
•51•01·e 10.00·
"08'59"W(R) 4.00'
I
I
I
I
,-- - =svo1•E(R) 5"fl!' - I
R=21.00' A=72°39'31" L=26.63' I
CB=N36°28'44"W CD==24.88'
72°48'29"W 6.56'
_...,.---,,....,•51•01·e 10.00· I ..._,_
I
·os•59-w 42.00· I
LOT3

7.233:tAC I
~:--c-,.......,..,A0•51•01·e 10.00·
72°30'32"E 6.56' J
R=21.00' ll=72°39'31" L=26.63
CB=N36°10•4re CD=24.88' I
0 51'01"E(R) 5.00'
N89"30'20"E 3964.76'(OA) ~~I_
0 §fi'1.:;_~1'
1 \ f
LOT 6 / l
22,124 S.F. 1 1
P.E./P.U.E. WESTPARK - PHASE 4 / l
(I.OD./R.O.W.) LOT 1-A { l
CC B.M. 53 l !
I !
N
Line Table Curve Table
Line# Bearing Length Curve# Radius Delta length Chord Bearing Chord Length
l1 N81°01'56"W 60.83'
C1 50.00' 28°21'2r 24.75' N76° 18'56"W 24.49'
l2 N00°29'40"W 37.33' c---
C2 50.00' 89°59'56" 78.54' N44"30'21"E 70.71'
l3 N89°30'20"E 55.00'
C3 4060.00' 00°30'56" 36.52' Na1•32•39•e 36.52' 0 50 100 L4 N89°51'01"E 10.00'
C4 3940.00' 02°13'09" 152.61' N88°23'45"E 152.60' SCALE:1 "=100' C5 26.00' 90°20'42" 41.00' N45°19'19"W 36.88'
C6 26.00' 89°39'18" 40.68' N44°40'41"E 36.66'
tt)
tu w
:I:

Cl}
w w en
200
R=26.00' ll=90"00'00" L=40.84'
CB=N44°51'01"E CO=36.TT' _J
-------
_ _J

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
DETAIL "4A" DETAIL "48"
SCALE: 1"=40' SCALE: 1 "=40'
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050338, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034nl, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
AIICAYIWS APRIL 2020
B41NELRS PLANNE111 IUIIVEYORI SHEET 4 OF 15 1025CnlokSlde Rilgellrive, SUite 150, R<M,iile, CA95678 (916Jn3-1189 18431.RST -- ·-- ---------------------------------
BOOK ~ta
SEE SHEET6
I I f l l LOT 9 \ ' \
I < I I! \ \ \
line Table Curve Table
0 - i t
I i 1 20· P.E.I ~, : N86·oa•24-w 809 65' r- - - - - , ~ \ 1 S! -8 ',~. 1 1 N86°08'24"W827.76' - - - _ j_l\_l_ _ _ - \ \ ', I ; ~ I~ I I I \ \ - - - - - \ 'I \ LOT 24
I ~ I~ : : ~ \ \. . '7---. l \\
C I O ,~ I I \. '- ~ \ -_-l.----
0::<( uj'_ ~ I~ I I '- -.....__ \ \ ' 8 SEE DETAIL "SA" ON I ' - --- ........ \ 1\ > o_ , lz ', ', ~ ......_ .L \ W THIS SHEET -..._ _ -..._ _. ..J?: 18- I 11 ~--- --- \
5 Q «> '5 I 20' X 20' B.S.E. l : L -- --- T - I \
c:D 0~ '1~ 65' - ,-, y :, :, - - - - - ---,._ - \ \ "'d" ('~ 't' \ R=900.00' li.=29°56'48" L:470.40' t- : 8 g _j 1
1 ~ -! !-10• P.G.E. ESMT PER LOT B <.0! in \UJ \ CB=N11°20'10"W CD=465.07(0A) W g a:: <' I a.: 1 1 1357 O.R. 417 TO BE 9.224:tAC ~-~!O..'.'.;IBL__ _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ \ W c:D O I ~ in : : QUITCLAIMED BY COMMERCIAL ----1-.J (.) 1 u. \ LO ..- Cl)I- i=i'_ I..., 11 11 SEPARATEOOCUMENT ~ -,C C"-1 en w ; , ~ , : : ~-~1.~~IB1 / , ~ ~ \ 1-....10
3: : I 65' I l : R=832.00' 25' P.U.E. -I - 0: 1 < I
W , 1 : I R=2100_00, A=08"44'31" L=126.94' 1 ~ ci Im
W m 1 °'- & 1 1 A=04°07'54" L=151.44' CB=N00°43'04"W l u Q ffi I Cl) ~ I !.:; ~~~- i I [CB=N88"25'43"W CD=126.82' ~--~Q'.1,9.'.'.;IB~ f ::::..13: I z 55, ~v'-",9~_ 1 1 I35' P.U.E. CD=151.40' ,.,,J . fg I 65' 1 :o< 4 ;,, ....._,,,,. N89"30'20"El l . .$~ 1 ~
I ~ 'o- -133.23' 7 i -0- - - - - - - -0- - - - - _N86"21'46"W 433.58' _I50'!_.U.E. _,i,~ ;._ _s \. ~: 0 - l : - 124 11' - - - - - - ~ "\~ ' ~I 33' \.
' gl N89°30'20"E 199.23' l l t I NB2• · > 43 ~/.., '-
I
O I - I I • \ 38'04"W a _ .- N
I: l8 : l l8 ~:~'Q?g@l N85 24'34"W 180.12' = 0 ' ,£1 ~. ~ 1 N89°30'20"E 808.75'(0A) 1 1 -c22 c21 BLUE ~ f NS6 2146"W 282.03' • - c, co/ ---1:------,----H---O------@- ___ ~SBOULEVARD l5 r> in 304·23 f8 1 1 N01°00'04"E'R' (I - - - - - - N86°21'46"W913 • 8 i ~ C2 It) ~_'.'~!()~l~ ! ! "';:-,--f8°----.!:~ /,....NQ£o]~•~_.:~(fil .O.D,.O.W./C.E.) 551.58'- - - - - - - .28(0~)- - z, ~1.70'(0~)- \
\
I
I
I
I , ,
I
,.._ 78.34' ., .A LS _ L4 l l L3 ~: c1 : L2 L1 392.06' 26.13'~2.64'(0A) . r \~~1~'Q.3.:'~'lRl 1 ~~';f lF. N89°i30'20"E 3964.76'(0A) 1 I : P.E./P.U.E. I I ~
l 1 (1.0.0./R.O.W.) i CITY OF ROSEVILLE l -------
1 I~ I I
I I -~-- I I I ~ 1 l
-~~~-------------------,
I ', 588•45•59•e , I
647.20'(0A) C4 '~ 20.02' - --::--------lRJ N86°08'24"W 761.B4'(0A) LOT 9 \ I 646.SO'(OA} c1-----T .~s 142.42' _,6.922tAC \ b I
-------- 20.31'\ C6 _\ 9 ~
I
_,, ✓:t- -r-.::- - _ _ _ _ _ 160.55• 1 \ -~-tl; I 884°48'03-W / \ 1 ... _ - - - - - 4 tli ,-t:, "" ,.. ________ lRJ,../ ~ \ \ ......... ~~~~2-'WlRJ N86°08'24"W827.76'(0A)- - - - -~~- i \ \~ ,> (P I o i, , ~ "iY_} ti' ,~ \'!i.9 % I o> ·o \ ~,.;> u>~_ . \ \~ \~ ~ -,... ~ o.\ R=90.00' ti.=10°53•21· L=111.3s• !;>,. "I,- , \~ \<£ o a I I ~- v.\ \./CB==N33°13'24"WCD=104.38' ~ ,~-~ ~ ,t;, ~\CJ. <il, ',,, ,~-=-- z.

I ·o. ~ \1\ I ~~- ~' '._ LOT 8 ~j.j'-'Q ... ::.----b·
I
-.i-,.., ~~:, ''- 9.224tAC N86°21'46"W 35.00' 1 Q \-z.1~ 0 I..'. ,... A=06° 56' 19• L=105.11' \ - - I ~~ <~' ......_ ......_ CB=N10°32'16"W' CD=105.05' \t \~ ,.z ~,> .6''- ---0.. .J. \ ~E, \~ \1:11
I
,t_ '- R=843.00' li.=17°12'03• L=253.08'--- 1 _.1° I
. '<t, •7o, '- ...._ ----~~40 CB=N15°43'59"WCD=252.13' \ o 1~ 1~ '- ....._ ..._ ..._t,5"w \ ~ ~\~
I
-0.. ---- ---sa.7e• i / 1-'i I l ...._-..._ ,-.._ ---.: ._ ._ ~I~ 0 j[~..'.'.;IBl \ \,\2_ ~I ~
I :c>o•~~40-o,¾_.s.,___ -..--o..... - _c11_ - -o- -c"i!-C"3 ~ ,,/'rl . · '3.78-,.... -..._ C13~ \ l '\O /
I ...... '" - - ~ ,.i: I "0-.--. C10 ~ -,,tr- L9 1~
- - - - - - -<r ., \ \~
I .,, ~ ~ \CJ! I
~_°l!:~.'.'.;IB}/" 0 \ 0 \~
1 ~.!!~-~?~~~~~---:¼ L1~ ~w I
L1
L-------------------~-~J DET All "5A"
SCALE: 1"=40'
N
tw w
:I::

Cl)
w w
Cl)
N
0 50 100
Line # Bearing
L 1 N82°29' 17"W
L2 N87°36'06"W
l3 N80"39'36"E
l4 N89°30'20"E
LS N81"01'56"W
l6 N89°30'20"E
L7 N08°58'06"E
l8 N10"15'56"W
L9 Nn°56'30"E
L 10 N77°56'30"E
L 11 N77°56'30"E
L 12 Nn°56'30"E
L 13 N77°56'30"E
L 14 N77°56'30"E
L 15 N00"46'21"E
L 16 N00°47'55"E
L 17 N03"38'14"E
200
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND SCALE: 1 .. = 1 00' Length

37.05'
165.67'

60.72'
120.00'

60.83'
526.20'

60.83'

60.88'

47.09'

25.03'

22.06'

47.77'

25.00'

22.77'

80.00'

59.56'

50.23'
Curve# Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
C1 1945.00' 01°23'50" 47.43' N88°18'01"W 47.43'
C2 50.00' 47°09'23" 41.15' N65"55'38"E 40.00'
C3 50.00' 90°00'02" 78.54' N45°29'39"W 70. 71'
C4 285.00' 01°10'19" 5.83' N01 °38'07"E 5.83'
C5 305.00' 00°59'15" 5.26' N01 °43'39"E 5.26'
C6 90.oo· 09•2r24• 14.85' N02°30'26"W 14.84'
C7 110.00' 07°25'14" 14.25' N01°29'21"W 14.24'
C8 110.00' 63°28'07" 121.85' N36'56'01"W 115.72'
C9 90.00' 61°25'57" 96.50' N37'57'06"W 91.94'
C10 110.00' 33°23'25" 64.10' N85°21'47"W 63.20'
C11 90.00' 33°23'25" 52.45' N85°21'47"W 51.71'
C12 843.00' 03"48'53" 56.13' N12°38'27"W 56.12'
C13 843.00' 01°21'37" 20.01' N10°03'12"W 20.01'
C14 843.00' 02°14'27" 32.97' N08°15'11"W 32.97'
C15 868.00' 17°17'37" 261.99' N15'42'55"W 261.00'
C16 868.00' 03°14'07" 49.01' N12"23'22"W 49.01'
C17 868.00' 01°19'15" 20.01' N10°06'40"W 20.01'
C18 868.00' 02·22•57• 36.09' N08°15'34"W 36.09'
C19 857.00' 08°41'28" 130.00' N00°42'30"W 129.87'
C20 50.00' 90°00'00" 78.54' N48'38'14"E 70.71'
C21 2000.00' 04°07'54" 144.23' N88°25'43"W 144.19'
C22 2065.00' 00°35'42" 21.45' N89"48'11"E 21.45'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GR.ANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034778, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH; RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEV1LLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIACKAY l W9 APRIL 2020
ENGIIEERS PLANNER8 SURVEYORS
1025 Croel<side Ridge Drive. SUlte 150, Roseville. CA 95678 (916) 773-1189 SHEET 5 OF 15 18431.RST I 50• "
60' 1 : : LOWER BANK DRIVE
/,., - - -U (1.0.D./R.O.W.IC.E.) ... u LOT 23 1 T - - _ _ .,,,...... (.) 11 ----
LOWER BANK ;.. I ;.. I I -./
DRIVE --.:! - - _ l N86~ , l I
(1.0.D./R.O.W./C.E.) ;.. 244.97'(0~ - - - --:-<>! 17"W(RJ ~f.OA~ _:_ • 1' M N86°08'17"W1934t' 11 405~ - - - -0-- ----59 09' · 1 L5 50.00' - - ~ -. !i 134.32' I I - ---_ ......
tw w
J:
en
w w en
,.(C,H., ---""i'tr-25837•----1-~
~{rv~~ ! !L25• P.U.E. 1
--- N89"56'trwt.~ l I
LOT10
22,058S.F.

P.E./PU.E.
(1.0.D./R.O.W.)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--t :-10• P.G.E. ESMT PER
: 1357 OR 417 TO BE
l QUITCLAIMED BY
l SEPARATE DOCUMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
LOT9

6.922:tAC
R=544.00' A=29°47'54" L=282.92'
CB=N41 °12'31'W CD=279. 75'
CB=N48°30'53'W CD=392.29' \
\
\
1 51.4' - ~ :

Q. LJ l
: J~:-::~,+:::::::::--=-:::-::::-::ii:::-:::=:::--::-::::-::::::"Jiii¥<~7~61B.~~~-~=-::-:::-----,,-----~ - 7 i - - - - - - - _N86°08'24"W 809.65' 11 -------
: i LOT 8 -----, \ -------
' I \ \
SEE SHEET 5
13,
~z~•E!~JIIB)Y,
1 r--
1 -- --------·--7
I
I
I
I
----
R=110.00' A=20°34'19" L=39.50'
I CB=N01°22'29"E CD=39.28'
I L ____ _ --
C13
A=19°17'43" L=33.68'
CB=N21"18'30"E CD=33.52'
9 -- -----DETAIL "6A"
SCALE: 1"=40'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_J
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND I
\
0 Line Table
Line# Bearing length
L1 N01°26'56'W 197.34'
L2 N01 °26'56'W 45.34'
l3 N86.08'24'W 48.00'
l4 N03°51'43"E 25.00'
L5 N89°17'1rE 50.16'
l6 N41°os•1rw 14.14'
L7 N79°27'5rw 22.03'
LS N78°20'22'W(R) 34.00'
l9 N11°39'38"E 6.52'
l10 N79°27'5rw 23.35'
L11 N64"38'11"E 14.36'
L12 N53°50'59'W 48.05'
L13 N86°21'46'W 35.00'
l14 N41°59'33'W 82.37'
N
50 100 200
SCALE:1 "=100'
BOOK ~ OF MAPS, PAGE t:t-z
Curve Table
Curve# Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
C1 2000.00' 34°58'27" 1220.83' N16°59'35"E 1201.96'
C2 2000.00' 04°21·21· 152.05' N01"41'02"E 152.01'
C3 2000.00' 30°37'06" 1068.78' N19°10'16"E 1056.11'
C4 1940.00' 01°53'58" 64.32' N00°27'21"E 64.32'
C5 50.00' 92°27'23" 80.68' N47°38'02"E 72.21'
C6 80.00' 30•2a·oo· 42.54' N70°54'1rw 42.04'
C7 20.00' 34•50•33• 12.16' N38"15'00"W 11.98'
C8 110.00' 32°29'22" 62.38' N04 °35'03-W 61.54'
C9 110.00' 11°55'03" 22.88' N14°52'12'W 22.84'
C10 100.00' 26°34'24" 46.38' N24°56'50"E 45.96'
C11 100.00' 07°16'41" 12.70' N34°35'42"E 12.69'
C12 30.00' 43•59•00· 23.03' N60°13•33•e 22.47'
C13 110.00' 31•37•22· 60.71' N81°58'16'W 59.94'
C14 548.00' 05°01'33" 46.07' N63°38'46'W 48.05'
C15 900.00' 29°56'46" 470.40' N11°20'10"W 465.0T
C16 868.00' 17"17'37" 261.99' N15"42'55"W 261.00'
C17 868.00" 10·21•19• 156.88' N19°11'04'W 156.66'
C18 843.00' 11°12•03• 253.08' N15°43'59'W 252.13'
C19 843.00' 09•4ro1· 143.97' N19°26'2rw 143.80'
C20 1900.00' 00•33•21· 18.43' N00°12'58"W 18.43'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER ANO RE-SUBDIVISION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND <t AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-G050331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-G034771, OFF1CIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIAIICAY. IIIIPS APRIL 2020
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS SHEET 6 OF 15 1025 ~ Ridge Drive. Suite 150, Rasevitle, CA 95678 (916) n3-1189 18431.RST 0 N
w
~ ...J
co ...J
o-
i 0 G'.j
I (I)
...--0 Rl on:: It)
..... ; I LL
50 100 200 r,-..0
a?= ~
SCALE:1•==100'
0 <..) ~
r ------R=26.00' A:90°00'00" L=40.84'
CB=N44°51'01"E CD=36.77'
I LOT12

8.131:1:AC
8 .. •
-
LOT 13
N00°08'59"W 78.13'
N89°51'01"E 423.39'
LOT 1
LOT12

8.131:1:AC
N89°51'01"E 795.39'
------7
R=26.00' A:90°00'00" L=40.84'
CB=N45°08'59"W CD=36.TT' I
LOT 11

8.124:1:AC I I
I
I
N89°51'01"E . 106.00'
----1----53.00' - 53.00'
0:: -:-
- w
0 08'59-W(R) 38.00'
I
I N89°51'01"E 8.00'
N72°48'29"W 6.56'
I
R=21.00' A=72°39'31" L=26.63'
C8=N36°28'44"W CD=24.88'
L
N89"51'01"E(R) 5.00'
------
r
I
N89"51'01"E(R) 5.00'
R=21.00' A=72°39'31" L=26.63'
CB=S36°10'47"W CD=24.88'
I
ILOT12
,8.131:1:AC
N00°08'59"W 42.00'
I
I
N72"48'29"W 6.56'
R=21.00' li.=72°39'31" L=26.63'
CB=N36°28'44"W CD=24.88'
N89°51'01"E(R) 5.00' L _____ _
~I- W .
~,~ ~~ ~ N <( •
o I QO
8! c!!; z :::> . oq ..Jq
(.);::.. I
_J -DETAIL "7A"
SCALE: 1"=40'
I
72°30'32"E 6.56' I
R=21.00' A=72°39'31" L=26.63'
CB=N36"10'47"E CD=24.88' I
0 51'01"E(R) 5.00' - J -----
SEE SHEET 8
Curve#
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C20
C21
C22
C23
C24
I 12.5' I
l LOT 15 P.U.E. j ____ 1 __

CLOUD DANCE DRIV
(1.0.D./R.O.W./C.E.)
I-see DETAIL ·1e· ON

THIS SHEET
LOT 2
SEE SHEET4
Curve Table
Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
Line#
L1

21.00' 72°39'31" 26.63' N36°28'44"W 24.88' L2

21.00' 90°00'00" 32.99' N44°51'01"E 29.70' L3
581.00' 11"12'59" 113.74' N84°32'29"W 113.56' L4
600.00' 11"12'59" 117.46' N84°32'29"W 117.27' L5
600.00' 22°25'58" 234.91' N89°51'01"E 233.42' L6
600.00' 11°12'59" 117.46' N84·32'29"W 117.27' L7
600.00' 11·1xs9• 117.46' N84°14'32"E 117.27' LS
619.00' 06°30'11" 70.26' N82°11'05"W 70.22' L9

26.00' ss·1r12· 38.70' N42°47'35"W 35.23' L10

26.00' ss·1r12· 38.70' N42"29'37"E 35.23' L11
619.00' 06°30·11· 70.26' N81°53'08"E 70.22' L12
600.00' 11"12'59" 117.46' N84°14'32"E 117.27' l13
581.00' 11"12'59" 113.74' N84°14'32"E 113.56' L14

21.00' 90•00·00· 32.99' N45"08'59"W 29.70' L15

21.00' 90•00·00· 32.99' N44"51'01"E 29.70' L16

50.00' 87°30'59" 76.37' N42°22'48"W 69.16' L17
1000.00' 04°00'41" 70.01' N88°08'38"W 70.00' L18
2060.00' 00°11'39" 6.98' N00°23'49"W 6.98' L19
2000.00' 34°58'27" 1220.83' N16°59'35"E 1201.96' L20
2000.00' 04°21'21" 152.05' N01"41'02"E 152.01'
2000.00' 30°37'06" 1068.78' N19"10'16"E 1056.11'
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND

LOWER BANK DRIVE
(I.O.D./R.O.W./C.E.)
LOT 11

8.124:1:AC
N89"51'01"E 763.76'
LOT 3
Line Table
Bearing Length Line#
N89°51'01"E 10.00' L21
N89°51'01"E(R) 5.00' L22
N00°08'59"W 2.00' L23
N89"51'01"E(R) 59.00' L24
N89°51'01·e 27.00' L25
N89°51·01·ecR) 32.00' L26
N00°08'59"W 631.42' L27
N00°08'59"W 45.00' L28
N00°08'59"W 45.00' L29
N89°51'01"E(R) 120.58'
N00°08'59"W 5.00'
N89°51'01"E 67.58'
N89°51 '01 "E 347.88'
N89"51'01 "E 120.58'
N89°51'01"E 227.29'
N00°08'59"W 90.00'
N00°08'59"W 45.00'
N00°08'59"W 45.00'
N89°51'01"E 67.58'
N00°08'59"W 5.00'
BOOK ~ OF MAPS, PAGE 47 7
SEE SHEET 10
20' X 20' B.S.E.
• 8 z
(0
tw w
J:
en
ow ..... w
~ en
0 ...J
Line Table ~-------- --,
I
Bearing Length
N89'51'01"E(R) 64.00'
N89'51'01 "E(R) 32.00'
N89'51'01"E(R) 32.00'
'

6... DAYDREAM DRIVE
._ -- ._ fV'l..,• 1.0.DJR.7.W. -- --<..:18~
I -~t2t

I ------ --
12°48'29-w I
o.2r I
N00°08'59"W (R) 5.00' 1 LOT13

7.195:1:AC
N00°08'59"W

78.13'
N89'51'01"E
N87°08'59"W
N03"51'43"E
N84°33'18"W
N09"58'16"E

24.38' L --87.07'

31.34'

26.32'

61.01'
- ----
DETAIL "7C"
NTS
--

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 1-4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 2-4, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034778, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIACICAY I SIIIPS APRIL 2020
~~Onve.~.CA956~~ SHEET 7 OF 15 18431.RST
-------~--------------~---------- ----- ------------------- -----------------------~ Curve Table
Curve# Radius Delta length
C1 300.00' 13°37'45" 71.36'
C2 329.00' 08°57'35' 51.45'
C3 16.00' 82°28'24" 23.03'
C4 625.00' 02°08'34' 23.38'
C5 625.00' 01°59'09' 21.66'
C6 625.00' 00°09'26" 1.72'
C7 320.00' 13°37'45" 76.12'
ca 280.00' 12•09•40• 59.43'
C9 625.00' 19•3745• 203.21'
C10 644.00' 1s•3r45• 209.39'
C11 26.00' 90°00'00" 40.84'
C12 26.00' 90•00'00· 40.84'
-
C13 500.00' 11°43'31' 102.32'
C14 481.00' 11°43'31' 98.43'
C15 500.00' 14°43'31' 128.50'
SEE SHEET9
P.G.E. EASEMENT PER
272 O.R. 247 TO BE

QUITCLAIMED BY

SEPARATE DOCUMENT
LOT13

7.195±AC
N00°08'59"W 78.13'
N89°51'01"E 423.39'
LOT 12
Chord Bearing Chord
Length Curve# Radius
N06°39'54'E 71.19' C16 520.00'
N04°19•49•e 51.40' C17 600.00'
N32°25'36"W 21.09' C18 600.00'
N72°35'31"W 23.37' C19 600.00'
N72°40'13"W 21.66' C20 600.00'
N71°35'56"W 1.72' C21 600.00'
N06"39'54"E 75.94' C22 619.00'
N05"55'51"E 59.32' C23 26.00'
NB0·50'06"W 202.32' C24 300.00'
N80°50'06"W 208.47' C25 314.00'
N44°51'01"E 36.77' C26 314.00'
N45"08'59"W 36.77' C27 21.00'
N84°17'13"W 102.14' C28 581.00'
N84°17'13"W 98.26' C29 21.00'
N07°12'47'E 128.15' C30 314.00'
l27
C32 /
t4.!!."~~~IB1''
LOT 12
SEE SHEET7
Curve Table
DeHa Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length Curve#
14°43'31' 133.64' N07"12'47'E 133.27' C31
11°12'59' 117.46' N84"14'32'E 117.27' C32
22°25'58" 234.91' N89°51'01"E 233.42' C33
11°12'59' 117.46' N84°14'32"E 117.27' C34
11°12'59' 117.46' N84"32'29"W 117.27' C35
11·12•59• 117.46' N84°32'29"W 117.27' C36
07°32'57" 81.56' N86°04'33'E 81.50' C37
91°02'16' 41.31' N52"10'48"W 37.10'
03°49'41' 20.04' N08°34'31"W 20.04'
06°30'42' 35.69' N03°24'19"W 35.67'
01°30'26" 8.26' N07"24'53"W 8.26'
90°17'38' 33.09' N36°58'42'E 29.77'
15•2ro1· 156.67' N89"51'01"E 156.20'
90°17'38' 33.09' N37°16'39"W 29.77'
01°30'26" 8.26' N07°06'56"E 8.26'
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND SEE SHEET 10
I
27' 127' LOT 11
Curve Table
Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
314.00' 06°30'42" 35.69' N03°06'22"E 35.67'
300.00' 03°49'41' 20.04' N08°16'34"E 20.04'

26.00' 91°02'16" 41.31' N51°52'51'E 37.10'
619.00' 01•32•sr 81.56' N86°22'30"W 81.50'

26.00' 90°00'00' 40.84' N45°08
1 59"W 36.77'

21.00' 72°39'31' 26.63' N36°10'47"E 24.88'

21.00' 72°39'31' 26.63' N36°28'44"W 24.88'
0 N
r
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
L
BOOK e~ OF MAPS, PAGE q7
Line Table Line Table Line Table
Line# Bearing Length Line# Bearing Length Line# Bearing Length L1 N13°28'4rE 13.66' L16 N89°51'01"E 347.88' L31 N89°51'01"E(R) 19.00' l2 N71°31'13"W 98.23' L17 N89°51'01"E 227.29' L32 Ns0•51•01·ecR) 4.00' L3 N71°31'13"W 79.87' L18 N89°51'01"E 120.58' L33 N72°30'32"E 6.56' L4 N71°31'13"W 58.04' L19 N89°51'01"E 75.58' L34 N89°51'01"E 8.00' "-
L5 N16°20'12'E(R) 29.00' L20 N10°29'21'W 26.95' L35 Noo·oa·59"W 42.00' L6 N89°51'01"E 77.61' L21 N83°20'20"E(R) 28.00' L36 N89°51'01'E(R) 5.00' L7 N89°51'01'E 77.61' l22 N83°20'20"E(R) 14.00' L37 N00°08'59'W 2.00' L8 N00·08'59"W 19.00' L23 N83°20'20"E(R) 14.00' L38 N89°51'01"E 59.00' L9 N78°25'28"W 28.98' L24 N10°11'24'E 26.95' L39 N89°51'01"E 27.00' L10 N14°34'32"E 30.45' l25 N83°38'17"W(R) 28.00'
L11 N78°25'28"W 7.96' L26 N83°38'17"W (R) 14.00'
L12 N14°34'32"E 10.37' l27 N83°38'17"W(R) 14.00'
L13 N00°08159"W 90.00' l28 N89°51'01"E 120.58'
L14 N00°08'59"W 45.00' l29 N89°s1·01·e 75.58'
L15 N00°08'59"W 45.00' L30 N89°51 '01 'E(R) 1.00'
---
--
LOT17

18.723:t:AC
LOT13

7.195±AC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- ---- - - _ _J
DETAIL "8A"
SCALE: 1'=10'
r----
I LOT 16 N89"51'01"E(R~

3.593±AC 1 ·00
I R=26.00'
A=90°00'00' L=40.84'
-- ---
I N89°51'01'E(R) 38.00'

19.00' 19.00'
8 g_
~18
11~ I
CB=N44°51'01'E
CD=36.77'
---
• I
--- ~, __
DETAIL "SC"
SCALE: 1"=20'
-- --DETAIL "88"
SCALE: 1*=20'
---
-
N89°51'01"E(R) LOT 20 I
1 OO' 5.986±AC
· R=26.00'
A=90·oow L=40.84' I
CB=N45°08'59"W
CD=36.77'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
-
BEING A MERGER A.ND RE-SUBDMSION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 A.ND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, A.ND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034771, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
I
_J
50 200 CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
SCALE:1•=100'
IIIIKAY. WS APRIL .2020

ENGMERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
1025 Creek!lde Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Rceeville, CA 95678 (916) 773-1189 SHEET 8 OF 15 18431.RST 50' B.P.E.
----J__
-- -- -- -- -- -- ------------ --- ---
NB1°41•s2-w
272.56'(1)
----------------...
'- '- '- '- '- '-
P.G.E. EASEMENT PER
272 O.R. 247 TO BE

QUITCLAIMED BY

SEPARATE DOCUMENT
'- ''-
''-
I'- R=48.00' 6=79°46'13" L=66.83'
I '- '- CB=N04°01'15"E C0:::61.56'
I '- R=36.00' 6=21°39'44" L=13.61'
I '- · CB=N33"04'30"E CD=13.53'
I '-,
'
'-
' I '-,
I R=1979.00' 6=03°39'36" L=126Af_:'-~-,
I CB=N20°24'50"E CD=126.39'
I
I
I
LOT18

1.544±AC -✓ (<,
.§14" .I / .',/§i
/. ~ ~ry ..::,· /
'- <i)q_·/
I
I R=26.00' A=91°30'30" L=41.53'
I CB=N27°10'13"W CD=37.25'
.._____ -. '- ,{I,· I ct -- .... ._, -..... ' 5°26'42-W(R) 19.00' ,y7<•S5 -., I I ~"W1.. s::::--c'?i
" 1-19•
LOT17

18.n3±AC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N17°04'32"E(R) 38.04'------1 '- / '-
R=26.00' A=81°08'57" L=36.82'~ ). [1 I '- '-
CB=N29"06'17"W CD=33.82' y I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R=369.00' A=11°37'10" L=74.83'__.--: /
CB=N05°39'37"E CD=74.70' l I
. ? I lei! I 0>
it f,.. I .,....
~I «? I t----'o
m1 i1
~I :: I
81 ~I
zl ?I
WHISTLING BEND WAY -I ~ 1--
40' 1.0.D./R.O.W. Ito I
I R;604.00' A=18"37'45" L=196.39'
I CB=N80°50'06"W CD=195.52'
I~ I
I I
SEE DETAIL "9A"

ON THIS SHEET
R=16.00' A=82"28'24" L=23.03'
I
I
CB=N32°25'36"W CD=21.09'' ___ !,,1
R=329.00' 6=08°57'35" L=51.45'
CB=N04°1lr49"E CD=51.40'-~•
N00°08'59"W 31.42'
q---iiiiNeiiii9~•5~1'0n11~"E'724~5in.()()n'' ----o-NN85;;;;;:0 1;-:;;r::-:54:::-"W:-:-1-4_1 _39-, "---.) I I I
LOT 13 N89"51'01"E 55.00' 11
It
I I
r
71°31'13"W 101.78' : :
r-1 NS9°s1·01·e 56.61•~1 I

1.-, -... -o... GRASSCREEK DRIVE I I
-... - .._ _ _rO' 1.0.D./R.O.W. I I
.._-... - C1 - - - -o- - l2 L - - ·
-- --- -- - _ r _ _ _ 19.00• .

LOT 14 --------
( LOT 15 )
SEE SHEET 8
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND 0 -1-w w ::c: en
w w en
-- - -- --------------~ ~-------------------
BOOK ~~ OF MAPS, PAGE er/
Line Table Curve Table
Line# Bearing length Curve# Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord Length
L1 N71°31'13"W 98.23'
C1 625.00' 18"3T45" 203.21' N80"50'06"W 202.32'
l2 N89°s1·01·e n.s1·
C2 350.00' 24°42'16" 150.91' N12"12'09"E 149.74'
C3 26.00' 82°31'14" 37.45' N65"48'55"E 34.29'
C4 369.00' 14°22'25" 92.57' N31°44'30"E 92.33'
C5 36.00' 21•4r12· 13.69' N28"02'06"E 13.61'
C6 48.00' 83°39'18" 70.08' N58"56'09"E 64.02'
C7 48.00' 140°01'45" 117.31' N87"09'23"E 90.22'
C8 320.00' 13"37'45' 76.12' N06°39'54"E 75.94'
C9 625.00' 02"08'34" 23.38' N72"35'31"W 23.37'
C10 625.00' 01"59'09' 21.66' N72"40'13"W 21.66'
C11 625.00' 00"09'26" 1.72' N71 °35'56-W 1.72'
r---- ------7
r- --
I
I
I
I
I
LOT17

18.723±AC
---I --- --- --- I I .._ .._
--- / ---,
~/§
!1?1 c:; I t, ~, I I:!
lit I
N
I gr-1
p:,, I I
I
I
... ,
I ~t ' i;f I;: LOT 13
I -, ft)
~, I- 7.195±AC
I
I , re fg I v-cs k ti
0 50 100 200
SCALE:1•==100' L _________ !_..J
DETAIL "9A"
SCALE: 1"=10' FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-suBDMSION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0058331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-8034TT8, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIAIKAY•WS APRIL 2020
ENGPIEERS PLANNEllS SURVEYORS SHEET 9 OF 15 1025 Cnieklide Ridge Drive, Suite 150. Rclee¥llle, CA 95678 (916) 773-1189 18431.RST r
I
I
I
I
L
,
<._Sf.YB.P.E.
'(~SEE DETAIL ·1oc·
Curve Table
0)
1-w w
:I: en
w w en
R=369.00'
t.=14 °22'25"
L=92.57'
CB=N31 °44'30"E
, CD=92.33' /
' -..._ ' I
--~ J '-;:--
-
, ON THIS SHEET
' R;:36.00' f.;:28°14'33" L•17.75'
CB=N36°5T01"W CD=17.57'(1)
s1°04'18"W 53.28'(1)
' '
R=1017.00'
t.=07°23'48" L=131.29' CB=N47°22'24"W' __ ...,_
CD=131.20(1)
' '- '-. 50' B.P.E.
<
"'
'\.

A'\
,,_ • ...,.,"26'42"W(R) 19.00'
'__.--N65°26'42"W(R) 21.00'
~ N43°40'30"W 73.96'(1 < ', \
', \
Curve#
C1
C2
C3
C4
cs
cs
C7
C8
C9
R=350.00'
t.=24 ° 42'16"
L=150.91'
CB=N12°12'09"E
CD=149.74'
I, '
I ', \
I ' \
l\ .. ,,.:,, , , '
\\
\ \
C10
C11
y t.=24°42'16" "-, \
r-- I Ile L=141.86' ,
.,.... I I:! CB=N12"12'09"E "- ....__ SEE DETAIL "10A"---\.. \ b I !cl'> CD=140.76' '- ON THIS SHEET '
-' I I~ '' \ I tlB LOT 19 ,
I I~ 7.542±AC '-,
I~ I~ '
--l i ;... :- WHISTLING BEND WAY P.G.E. EASEMENT PER/ '- '- , \ \
\ \
\\ )
~
C12
', LOT 29
\
\
\
Radius DeHa
1000.00' 04°00'41"
500.00' 11°43'31"
521.00' 11°43'31"

48.00' 140°01'45"

48.00' a3•39•1a·

36.00' 2s0 14'33"

52.00' 27°07'43"
2050.00' 04°18'07"
2050.00' 03•4rse·
2050.00' 00°30'08"
2060.00' os·or08"

50.00' 87°48'00"
, 37•ss•s9•w 58.24'{1)
~ ~ 40' I.O.D.IR.O.W. 272 O.R. 247 TO BE "-
I~ ~ I QUITCLAIMED BY ' ,
: ~ : SEPARATE DOCUMENT '- ....__
"'
3°51'22"W 36.16'(1)
I z I ',
I I
I I
I t GRASSCREEK DRIVE N12°41'00"E 60.55'
I I I 40' 1.O.D.IR.O.W.
_ .J L __ N89°s1·01·E216.56'_ -o- __ C3
237.56' C2 - --o- ~
N89°51'01"E 315.18'(OA) /
-------,---
LOT 1519.oo· .... ' LOT 1 6 LS-
SE E SHEET 8 R=S00.00' LS
t.=14°43'31" L=128.50' __ _,
CB=N07°12'47"E
CD=128.15'
R=480.00'
t.=14°43'31" L=123.36'
CB=N07°12'47"E
CD=123.02' N89°51'01"E I
I
I
I
2•53•55-e 62.80'
R=271.00' t.;:02°24'49" L=11.42'
CB=N78°19'50"W CD=11.41'
I
\
id
R=52.00' A=20°45'19" L=18.84' sa,
CB=N66°44'46"W CD=18.73' fl/ ~I • I

I-SKIPPING STONE WAY I/
-DETAIL "10C"
SCALE: 1"=40'
I
_J
00 I- co
w .-
W 5 :I: __J
en
I 40' 1.O.D./R.O.W.
1~ I ~
I~ I I
I(') - I- ~
I~ ~,a~ m ~ ~-,~ (')I(')?
lb I ~
LOT20

5.986±AC
-J;-:: -;=64:; t.:0-0 3;; ::.86-:- 7
~ rca=N35°21'20"W CD=11.85'(OA)(B.P.E.) I
·,()
w w en
I~ I
I I I I SEE DETAIL "8C"
-~\ ':./ 'l .59' C17(B.P.E.)
- -- -
NTS
--
I
I
I
_J
r.-
:I J(lf ON SHEET 8 t.;:Q?•oo•41•R~~:::

CB=N89°38'38"W
CD=122.30' ..., .... _,
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND Length

70.01'
102.32'
106.62'
117.31'

70.08'

17.75'

24.62'
153.92'
135.95'

17.97'
220.00'

76.62'
Chord Bearing
N88.08'38"W
N84°17'13"W
N84°17'13"W
N87°09'23"E
N58°58'09"E
N28°10'00"W
N28°43'2s-w
N 17°39'59"E
N17°55'03"E
N15°46'00"E
N09°or1 re
N49°57'43"E
0 0
0 &()
O> ...

II
50,cr
Chord
Length

70.00'
102.14'
106.43'

90.22'

64.02'

17.57'

24.39'
153.88'
135.93'

17.97'
219.90'

69.34'
Curve Table
Curve# Radius
C13 2000.00'
C14 125.00'
C15 125.00'
C16 64.00'
C17 64.00'
C18 48.00'
C19 48.00'
C20 48.00'
DeHa
04°21'21"
27°31'25"
03°38'36"
09°31'52"
01°05'26"
55•22·2r
20°06'38"
36°15'48"
Length
152.05'

60.05'

7.95'

10.65'

1.22'

47.23'

16.85'

30.38'
I
I
I
/~
Cb' ' / .:::,'-'f"
~ ~ I-~·
-J~· I~
• ,-.,,. I
~~/ • (.j
•~¼ I ~• I
..(;~I
•• ~ I
~ "- I rv tl ..,,. ,, I
$!! IJ:J I ,, (j
(c /
' I 't,
I
I
I '
I
N
0 50 100
BOOK ~e OF MAPS, PAGE t:f7
Line Table Line Table
Chord Bearing Chord
Lenglh
Line# Bearing Length Line# Bearing Length
N01°41'02"E
N23°15'40"W
N38°50'41"W
N35°54'03"W
N30°35'24"W
N51°00'58"W
N32°53'04"W
N61°04•1s-w
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
152.01'

59.47'

7.95'

10.63'

1.22'

45.35'

16.76'

29.88'
--
LOT19

7.542±AC
- -
L1 N89°51'01"E(R) 32.38' L9 N14°02'43"W 47.74'
L2 N00°08'59"'1,(R) 90.00' L10 N47°42'44"E(R) 4.00'
L3 N00°08'59"W 45.00' L11 N70°10'40"W 8.00'
L4 N00·08'59"W 45.00' L12 N70°11'00"W(R) 8.00'
LS N14°34'32"E 30.45' L13 N03"51'43"E 45.00'
L6 N1s·2s·2s-w 28.98' L14 N86°os·1rw 47.78'
L7 N14°34'32"E 52.52' L15 NS0°23'14"E 101.60'
LS N78°25'28"W 50.11' L16 N19°49'04"E 32.60'
--------------,
R=267.00' t.=01°38'49" L=7.67' I
----'\. v50' B.P.E.
"a.
'\.
'- CB=N42"51'05"W CD=7.6T(1) I
\ \ R=317.00' t.=34°10'32" L=189.08' I
~ CB=N26°35'14"W CD=186.29'(8.P.E.)
', I
', I ~' \
~~ ' I Cl ~ "~ ·'b, VSf.Y B.P.E.
:(SI ~~ d'. ' I ~ ~~ 0 V. \ ~ ~ ,,
c,,. -~-..; ~ ~
.;, :..>i .,.. • ', I ~ V.\~ ~-,,;,, ,, p-
P'i ~\ '6 <P, ', LOT 29 I

9. i\ %, ~' 24.877±AC
..... u>\ u> ~ ', I ~ ~, -~ ~
~ ;.:- .(S>
·c0r;, ~~ ', I -': ~ \ 'ai '£ ,.,,1'), \ I
~ ~, q
Q \ R=75.00' t.=31 °10'01" L=40.80'
\ ,/ CB=N25°04'58"W CD=40.30'{B.P.E.) I
' ', I C14__-\

46.08' \ ~ 't\. R=-114.oo' A=10•3r1s· L=-21.13' I
R=-125.00' t.=31 •10•01• L==68.00' ____.,.>... ~ CB=N35°21'20"W CD=21.10' (B.P.E.) CB=N2s
0 04'58"WCD=67.16'(OA)(B.P.E.) \ c1s 'q\ SEE DETAIL •108• I S52°58'37-WIB.)________ Ct6(B.P.E.) \ ON THIS SHEET

1.66' I C6(1 _...,k~].~-- \,,.; 50' B.P.E.

R=64.00' t.=10•3r1a· L=11.86' % ~. I
CB=N35°21'20"W CD=11.85'(OA)(B.P.E.) ~:,, \~,
N30°02'41"W 23.04'_/ / 'Z~ I
~zi·~~~~11 <<b ~ I
\ I
L -------- ---- - ---~--_J
DETAIL "10A"
SCALE: 1 "=40'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDMSK>N OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 18, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050338, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 2,4, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034771, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 1,4, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
200 IIIACIAY l 5alPS APRIL 2020
SCALE:1•=100' ENOll•EERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS SHEET 10 OF 15 1025 Cnlelt9ide Ridge Drive, Stile 150, -• CA 95678 (916) 773-1111! __ _ _ 18431.RST LOT 5 'u
50• I so·
I
+
I
I
r
I
------
I
I
I
1,o.._--C3
1 I
L --- ----DETAIL "11A"
SCALE: 1"=40'
-
-
-----~------------------------- ---- -- ----------
P.G.E. EASEMENT PER
272 O.R. 69 TO BE
-L0~47

12.927:tAC I
I
--
LOT24

12.927:tAC
SEE SHEET 12
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND Curve# Radius
C1 2000.00'
C2 50.00'
C3 120.00'
C4 30.00'
C5 110.00'
C6 110.00'
C7 110.00'
C8 1517.00'
C9 120.00'
C10 120.00'
C11 120.00'
C12 50.00'
C13 90.00'
C14 592.00'
C15 596.00'
----
C16 932.00'
C17 932.00'
BOOK ee OF MAPS, PAGE t::/7
Curve Table Line Table
Delta
04•21·21·
92°44'43"
21°17'00"
27°13'19"
30°36'46"
19°53'39"
10°43'0r
00°2T46"
31°00'23"
15•11'35"
15°48'48"
22°51'29"
30°01'24"
07"32'50"
29°47'54"
11°26'35"
09°58'26"
Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
Line# Bearing Length
L1 N37°29'50"W 99.09'
152.05' N01•41•02·e 152.01'
L2 N03°51'43"E 38.28'

80.94' N39°45'56"W 72.38'
L3 N56"35'24"E 30.20'

44.58' N83°13'13"E 44.32'
L4 N76"37'47"W 30.42'

14.25' N58°58'03"E 14.12'
L5 N74°4T36"W(R) 34.00'

58.77' N30.03'01"E 58.08'
L6 N76'3T47"W 27.44'

38.19' N35°24'34"E 38.00'
L7 N27°13'29"W 29.19'

20.58' N20"06'11 "E 20.55'
LS N70°21'51"W 8.41'

12.25' N14°58'31"E 12.25'
L9 N63"00'28"W 52.24'

64.94' N00°1T47"W 64.15'
L10 N70'11'00"W(R) 50.00'

31.82' N07"36'36"E 31.73'
L11 N70°11'00"W(R) 8.00'

33.12' N07°53'35"W 33.01'
L12 N70°11'00"W(R) 42.00'

19.95' N27°13'43"W 19.82'
L13 N86°08'17"W 39.88'

47.16' N53°40'10"W 46.62'

77.98' NS4 "54'27"W 77.92'
309.97' N41°1z31-w 306.49'
186.14' N20"41'49"W 185.83'
162.24' N21 °25'53-W 162.04'
N
0 50 100 200
SCALE:1 "=100'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDMSION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-4J034771, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIIAIKIY. -.S APRIL 2020
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS SHEET 11 OF 15 1025~Rldge Drive, Suite 150, Roae,iRe, CA95678 (916) 773-1189 18431.RST I.O
tw w :c en
w w en
\
\
. l..

1. . \
l
I
I
I
I
CX) I
51 _JI
I
)
/
SEE SHEET 11
\ ~ \ ,,l'.?~1~~-;~1 i ,,,\.. _NJi"..~~g~ LOT 24
I
\
33' , ... , ...... C4 N86"21'46"W 378.25'
', '-- ... ,~7s•ozs1·1;{RlR=957'
\,ll \--->- . :::, w. u-'o
~,~ z Q
c(I~
CO\ 0
" Q W I ::::,
~,
I
f,,
\ ',,~75"01'29"EJRl_R=932'
R=900.00' 6=29°56'48" L=470.40'
CB=N11°20'10"W CD=465.07(0A)
R=958.00' A=16°46'40" L=280.53'
CB=N04"<M'16"W CD=279.53'
R=933.00' t.=16°44'23" L=272.59'
I CB=N04°43'57"W C0=271.62' LOT25
J-25' P.E./P.U.E. 3.882±AC
I
,,
/
\ /
,,Y ,, ,, ,,
. f ~
I ~~
~, 33•
43' ~,-..... (") ()
l,1,. 25,668 S.F.
\,"Ii'?. ~
-b'~- ::'!: .,..,\.%-.. ~
?, . ~ 40' P.E./P.U.E. ~ N00°12'12"W
~ - - - ~ - ]_ ~ - 1!86°21'46-W 617.00' i 103.73'
------ ----
LtJ"I>
~,~
j.... 384.04'
115.37' ~ al f5 N86·21·46-woo1.04•
551~58'(0A)-- - :z, N86_:~~ 9~•~tUE OAKS BOULEVARD (1.0.0.IR.o. W./C E)

26.13' 362.64' 361.70'.....:;r- - - - - - .•
LOT27
22,081 S.F.
----
101.63'
682.54'
N89°30'20"E 3964.76'(0A)

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND Line#
L1
L2
R=2050.00'(1)
A=01°37'25" L=58.09'
CB=N85"33'03"W
CD=58.09
Line Table
Bearing
N81°35'57"W
N03"38'14"E
202.29'
I
N05"15'39"E(~}/
I
I
I
I
~--l-------------71
I
N
0 50 100 200
SCALE: 1"=100'
BOOK ~ OF MAPS, PAGE Cl-J
Curve Table
Length Curve# Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
120.42' C1 50.00' 90"00'00" 78.54' N41°21'46"W 70.71'

40.23' C2 932.00' 11°26'35" 186.14' N20°41'49"W 185.83' C3 932.00' 01°28'09" 23.90' N15°42'36"W 23.90'
C4 957.00' 00°56'51" 15.82' N15°25'28"W 15.82'
FOUND 3/4"

REBAR WITH NO
TAG

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDMSION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 18, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2011 AS INSTRUIIENT NO. 2019-8034778, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIACKAY. WI APRIL 2020
ENGIIEEM PLANNERS IUIIVEYORI SHEET 12 OF 15 1025 ~RidgeOrive, Suile 150, Roseoille, CA95678 (916) 773-1189 18431.RST LO .....
1-w
UJ
:::c en
w
UJ
en
N89°32'56"E 886.20'
LOT 33
R=600.00' A=41°39'53" L=436.31'
CB=N69°37'08"W CD=426.76'
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF

BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND
LOT30

63.700±AC
LOT 29

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
(1.0.0./R.O.W./C.E.)

PARCEL A
17 P.M. 102
N32°29'49"W 88.99'
~~t~1._3_:itt{.RJ_
N69°09'13"W 60.38'(TIE ',
N13"14'43"W 138.47' ',, -,;
SEE DETAIL "13A" ---------:

I reg

ON THIS SHEET
LOT28

24.242±AC
,--
1 LOT 30
I 63.700±AC N46°14'50"E(R) ---------- ' ', I
I
I
R=223.00' A=02°27'00" L=9.54'
CB=N44°58'40"W CD=9.53'
I
I
I
L_ ---
' ' ' ' ' ' ', ' '
--
SCALE: 1"=40'
BOOK~ OF MAPS, PAGE __
0 29'33"W 122.26'( 1)
r----;-+-..l-f.i55,•05•29-w
135.23'(1)
~
t-:Pt
I
Curve# Radius
C1 2050.00'
C2 1942.00'
C3 2000.00'
C4 2000.00'
C5 2058.00'
C6 1942.00'
C7 1942.00'
cs 230.00'
cs 170.00'
Line Table
Line# Bearing
L1 N70"10'40"W
L2 N70°11'00"W(R)
L3 N70°11'00"W(R)
L4 N81°35'57"W
L5 N86°21'46"W
L6 N55°31'11"W(R)
L7 N55°31'11"W(R)
LB N60"09'22"W
Curve Table
Delta Length
01°3725" 58.09'
14°39'46" 496.98'
30•3705• 1068.78'
34°58'27" 1220.83'
14°39'46" 526.67'
11•19•50• 384.04'
03°19'56" 112.94'
05°30'19" 22.10'
16°44'48" 49.69'
Length

8.00'

42.00'

76.15'
180.33'

58.00'

58.00'
180.06'
Chord Bearing Chord
Length
N85°33'03"W 58.09'
N27°08'56"E 495.63'
N19"10'16"E 1056.11'
N16°59'35"E 1201.96'
N27"08'56"E 525.23'
N28°48'54"E 383.42'
N21 °29'01 "E 112.92'
N52"05'09"E 22.09'
N57"42'23"E 49.51'
':<.t Cj
9"31'41"E 51.02'(TIE) 4ft
-11111iiii$!!!'!!!!!!!--
0 100 200 400
SCALE:1 •=200'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
LOT28 I 24.242±AC '1 BEING A MERGER A.ND RE-SUBOMSION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 A.ND 4 AS ~ _.. DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 18, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT / I NO. 2019-0050331, A.ND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS // DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT / I NO. 2019-0034771, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, // TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EA.ST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN I CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PliACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA I
I
I'-/ 50'8.P.E.
------ _J IIACICIY... APRIL 2020
~RdgeDr!Ye,~,CA956~~ SHEET13 OF 15 18431.RST
r
I
•4r40-w 151.29'
75°46'39"W 155.81'
R=1000.00' t.=38°13'46" L=667.23'
CB=N71°02'07"W CD=654.92'
201.63'(1)
11 LOT
-- - 7 /56"56'33"W 45.73' - - - - 7
. , I \ j 50' B.P.E.
,I
~ \ • '-1.. ✓52•13•31-w 23 87' I ~I~ '- .
3\~ u.. LOT29
!!! i ¾ '- 24.877:i:AC I . 'Q.

N43°40'30"W 73.96'(1
", r2•55•23-w 39.21· I
\. 'Q, 0. ~-2~'!4-:sIB}
,~, I \050• B.P.E.
' I ' ', I ' l
-- -- --
_ _J
DETAIL "14A"
SCALE: 1"=40'
BOOK ~6 OF MAPS, PAGE
Curve Table Curve Table
Curve # Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length Curve# Radius Deha Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
LOT 32
LOT31

62.576±AC
51°55'51-W 114.16'
J~QQ'.~~~l
R=1200.00' 6=38°24'20" L=804.36'
CB=N71°07'24"W CD=789.39'
------------
/ R=2TT.OO' 6=11°56'49" L=57.76'
CB=N45°5r26"W CD=57.65'
2°57'06'W 123.35'
2°5r06"W 21a.43'
1•53•1a-w 215.70'
R=500.00' t.=41°32'22" L=362.50'
CB=N69°33'22"W CD=354.61'
B9°40'27"E 512.16'
____ j_ ___ _
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
2058.00' 14°39'46" 526.67' s21·oa•55-w 525.23'
2000.00' 34°58'27" 1220.83' N16°59'35"E 1201.96'
2000.00' 30°37'06" 1068.78' N19°10'16"E 1056.11'
1942.00 14°39'46" 496.98' S21°08'56-W 495.63'
1017.00' 07°23'48" 131.29' N47"22'24"W 131.20'

36.00' 28°14'33" 17.75 N36°57'01"W 17.57'

48.00' 56°22'27" 47.23' N51"00'58"W 45.35'

48.00' 36°15'48" 30.38' N61°04'18"W 29.88'
~~~
;'--;~-AA.37' ~~
0 47'11 "W 696.35'(OA) ~~)'-
LOT 33 76'
C9 48.00' 20·0&'38" 16.85' N32°53'04"W 16.76'
C10 98.00' 11°58'37" 30.75' N33°57'04"W 30.62'
C11 2058.00' oa
0 08'08" 112.63' N21 ·2a·orE 112.61'
C12 2058.00' 11°31'38" 414.04' N28°43'00"E 413.34'
Line Table
Line# Bearing Length
L1 N55"31'11"W(R) 58.00'
L2 N55°31'11"W(R) 58.00'
L3 N70°10'40"W 8.00'
L4 N70°10'40"W 161.76'
L5 N59°4B'22"W 101.24'
L6 N47°43'55"W 76.28'
L7 N43°51'22"W 36.16'
LS N37"55'59"W 58.24'
L9 N30°02'41"W 116.15'
L10 N42°56'23"W 35.21'
N
~
R=2000.00' t.=06°44'00" L=235.04' ~
CB=N37°50'49"E CD=234.90' ~
I
I

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
(1.O.D/R.O.W./C.E.)
LOT 24
!l.t ca
~
0 100 200 400
SCALE:1•=200'

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION Of RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, AND A PORTION Of THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2011-00:Mnl, OFFICIAL RECORDS Of PLACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
IIIICICAY. SIIIPS APRIL 2020
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND EIJINEERI PLANNERS IURVEYOltS
1025 CJeekslde Ridge Drive, 5uilB 150, -• CA !l!i67ll (916) TTl-1189 SHEET 14 OF 15 18431.RST -- --~--~------~---------------------------------------- BOOK ~E OF MAPS, PAGE CfJ
' I LOT 1 l i
l AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1 I I I FOUND 314• REBAR WITH EE MAPS 51 I FOUND 2-1/4" I.P. WITH l I NO TAG. ACCEPTED AS FOUND 1• I.P. WITH l 2-1/2" ALUMINUM DISK DESIGNATED REMAINDER l I NORTHWEST CORNER OF PLASTIC CAP STAMPED l STAMPED AS SHOWN AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1 i SECTION 14, T.11N., R.5E. "P.L.S. 7579"PER(4) l PER(2)(B) EE MAPS 51 i 2)(3)(4)(5) l (N8S°38'09"E 2639.68')(10) N89"33'06"E 2639.76'{10) i ------~O - -659-:-95'(1)- --+-------•' __ ..,:N~B9:.•.::i:.•1~1~•~~97~9:;_73~.r~1) ____________ _,._.,_ - - 659.95'(1)- - ____ .....,N8;.aS.,.;•::e.,;'O~.~.a7i;,;12:39___,•·79.,.' --~ - - - - - - ------,;iiii,(1}""- - - - - - - :~ 15 I 14 (659.93')(4) (659.93')(2) (659.92'){2) (1319.85')(2) I t FOUND 314• REBAR WITH I FOUND 314• REBAR WITH NO
DAMAGED/ILLEGIBLE 1-112· I TAG 2.0' WEST OF BARBED
e9•51•oo·E 259.78'
Line Table
Line # Bearing Length
L 1 N89°40'27"E 7.18'
L2 N89°47'11"E 15.26'
Curve Table
Curve# Radius Delta Length Chord Bearing Chord
Length
C1 1950.00' 08°18'56" 283.01' N37"03'21"E 282.76'
LOT32
105.828tAC
R=1000.00' A=38°13'46" L::667.23'
CB=N71°02'0TW CCF654.92'
LOT 31
SEE SHEET14
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES, BASIS OF BEARINGS, REFERENCES AND LEGEND

ANTHEM UNITED CREEKVIEW

DEVELOPMENTS LP
DOC. NO. 2019-0103498
ALUMINUM CAP PER (2) 1 WIRE FENCE AT THE
1 NORTHEAST CORNER OF
I SECTION 14, T.11N., R.5E.

FOUND 314" REBAR WITH 1-1/2"

ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED
"LS. 3731" 0.09' NORTH AND

0.03' EAST OF SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF 20.038 ACRE
PARCEL PER (2}
(N89"57'58"E 660.151(2)
N89°33'01"E 660.13'
165. r I
R=1944.00' A=17°14'09" L:a:584.80' /
CB-N24"23'46"E C0=582.60'--- •• /
R=2000.00' ti.=25°54'07" L=904.14'
CB=N28°15'45"E CD=896.47' ,/
R=500.00' 6=41°32'22" L=362.50'
CB=N69"33'22"W C0=354.61'
N
0 300 600
--- -SCALE:1 •=300'

DESIGNATED REMAINDER
AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1
EE MAPS 51
FOUND 3/4" REBAR WITH 1-1/2" ALUMINUM
CAP STAMPED"L.S. 3731" 0.11' EAST AND

0.06' SOUTH OF SOUTHEAST CORNER OF

20.038 ACRE PARCEL PER (2)
,§Z!
0 ~!'!~~1
/ N89°33'01"E 1320.29' (1320.28')(10)
1155.12'
SEE SHEET 13
I
I
sl ... -
~~. MN · NI
~ ,.,I ,., .... ...

I
I
I;
1"!
,J
N

FINAL MAP OF
CREEKVIEW - PHASE 1

LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION No. PL 18-0190
BEING A MERGER ANO RE-SUBDIVISION OF RESULTANT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GR.ANT DEED RECORDED ON JULY 11, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0050331, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED ON MAY 24, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0034771, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF Pt.ACER COUNTY, WITHIN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN
CITY OF ROSEVILLE • PLACER COUNTY • CALIFORNIA
_IIAIKI_ r I s.,sw.vnail APRIL 2020
ENaIEEltS PLANNERS IURVE'IORS SHEET 15 OF 15 1025~ RidQellrive, Suile 150, ROleYilfe, CA95678 (916) m.11es 18431.RST

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2998
File #:
0206-03-01 & 0201-01
Title:

Longmeadow Parkside Community Facilities District No. 1 Bond Proceeds - Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.18.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of $250,000 from the Longmeadow Parkside Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 bond refunding to the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Projects Fund and appropriating those funds to three new capital improvement projects (CIPs) within the Longmeadow Parkside CFD boundaries.

BACKGROUND
The refunding of the Longmeadow CFD No. 1 bonds occurred in July 2023 and provided $250,000 of savings available for capital projects. In reviewing the renovation needs for the Longmeadow area, a spending plan was developed and includes:

• FY2023-24: $30,000 for park-wide repairs at Rickey Park. This includes play surfacing repairs, replacement of site furnishings, bark mulch and replanting

• FY2024-25: $30,000 for streetscape plant and irrigation upgrades in Longmeadow CFD No. 2 and Woodcreek East CFD No. 2

• FY2025-26: $190,000 for the play structure replacement at Rickey Park

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment recognizes the revenue from the bond refunding available for capital projects. The budget adjustment also transfers the bond refunding savings out of the Longmeadow Parkside CFD No. 1 and into the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Projects Fund to appropriate $30,000 to the Longmeadow Rickey Park Park-wide Renovations project, $30,000 to the Longmeadow CFD and Woodcreek East CFD Streetscape Upgrade project and $190,000 to the Longmeadow Rickey Park Play Structure Replacement project. Any shortfalls to funding the above projects would be budgeted through the Longmeadow CFD No. 2 (Services District) sinking funds. This action does not impact the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning & Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Vicinity Map
Ordinance 6738
Budget Adjustment
Longmeadow CFD 1 Bond Proceeds – Vicinity Map

Rickey Park

ORDINANCE NO. 6738

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-24, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for Longmeadow Community Facilities District 1 bond proceeds.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this ______________ day of _________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Tara Gee, Park Planning & Development Manager FISCAL YEAR: FY2023-24 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Anita Kwong, Management Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 10/18/23 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Recreation & Libraries/Park Development ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
7426 5569 80701 250,000
3130 5423 84001 500423 30,000
3130 5423 84001 500424 30,000
3130 6587 84001 500425 190,000
500,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
7426 4710 80701 250,000
3130 4780 10001 250,000
500,000
-

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

The Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department requests a budget adjustment for FY2023-24 to move $250,000 of bond proceeds from Longmeadow Parkside CFD (fund 7426) to the PRL Capital Projects Fund (fund 3130) in order to fund three projects. The three projects will fund 1) 500424 - Park- wide repairs at Rickey Park with planned completion in FY24 ($30,000), 2) 500423 - streetscape and irrigation upgrades in Longmeadow and Woodcreek East CFDs with planned completion in FY25 ($30,000) and 3) 500425 - play structure replacement at Rickey Park with planned completion in FY26 ($190,000). There is no impact on the General Fund.

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Increase budget to move bond proceeds to PRL Capital
Projects Fund

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Increase revenue budget - Bond refunding -
Longmeadow Parkside CFD 1
Increase revenue budget - Bond proceeds from
Longmeadow Parkside CFD 1
TOTAL
Establish project budget
Establish project budget
Establish project budget
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
9/15/202312:46 PM
1 09/20/2023

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3000
File #:
0203-10 & 0201-01
Title:

Maidu Community Center Audiovisual Upgrades - Budget Adjustment Contact:

Rob Nakamura 916-774-5135 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.19.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to create a new project for audiovisual upgrades at the Maidu Community Center and Riley Meeting Rooms.

BACKGROUND
The Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) Department is requesting a budget adjustment to appropriate funds for a capital project for audiovisual upgrades at the Maidu Community Center and Riley Meeting Rooms. One hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for this project was approved in the FY2023-24 budget.

Both of these facilities generate revenues through facility rentals hosting a variety of public and private events such as wedding receptions, parties, and business meetings. To make the facility more attractive and conducive to these events, now and into the future, staff have identified the need to upgrade audiovisual equipment in both facilities and have prioritized upgrading the equipment in both the main reception hall and Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 at the Maidu Community Center due to the age and functionality of the existing equipment. Remaining funds will be used to upgrade the equipment at the Riley Meeting Rooms.

FISCAL IMPACT
One hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for these upgrades was approved in the FY2023-24 budget and included in Parks, Recreation & Libraries operating budget. This budget adjustment will reduce that appropriation and move it into a project, resulting in no net impact on the General
Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the minor alteration of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal D – Enhance economic vitality
Goal E – Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F – Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Rob Nakamura, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Superintendent Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6739
Budget Adjustment
CEQA Exemption - AV Upgrades
ORDINANCE NO. 6739

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-24, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for Maidu Community Center audiovisual upgrades.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this ______________ day of _________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Rob Nakamura, Recreation Superintendent FISCAL YEAR: FY2023-24 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Rendi Hodge, Management Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 10/18/2023 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Recreation & Libraries/Recreation ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
1001 5524 58001 000000 (100,000)
1001 6587 84001 500426 100,000
-

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
-

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

The Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) Department requests a budget adjustment of $100,000 to establish the Audio Visual Equipment Upgrades at Maidu Community Center and Riley Meeting Rooms, project 500426. Improvements will include a ceiling mounted projector, audio upgrades and multiple monitors. The upgrades and funding were approved during the FY24 budget development process and added into PRL's operating budget.

This budget adjustment will reduce that appropriation and move it into a new project. There is no net impact on the General Fund.

Establish budget for project #500426
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Reduce Facility – Demand Services for PRL
Administration

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
9/15/20234:07 PM
1 09/18/2023

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: Maidu Community Center Audio/Visual Upgrades

Project Location(s): 1550 Maidu Drive, Roseville CA 95661

Project Description: The project is a proposal by the Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department for the replacement of the existing audio visual equipment at the Maidu Community Center . Competing with other regional spaces and facilities, staff have identified the need to upgrade audio visual equipment in both the main reception hall, as well as, meeting room 1 and 2 in effort to meet the technology needs for today’s events and in the future. Large video screens, improved sound, and ease of connectivity for presentations is desired for both spaces.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project : City of Roseville Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 1 E xemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 1 consists of ….minor alteration of existing public or private structures , facilities, [and] mechanical equipment” ...involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use … E xamples include but are not limited to: “ interior or exterior alterations involving such thi ngs as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances…”

The project is a minor alteration in the form of replacement of the existing audio visual equipment at Maidu Community Center, and would not expand use beyond existing levels. Furthermore, no environmentally sensitive resources are located within the project site; and therefore the Class 1 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Robert Nakamura , Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department, 316 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. (916) 774-5135.

Signature: Date: 9-29-2023
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2987
File #:
0800-03 & 0201-01
Title:

Utility Billing Payment Transactions - Budget Adjustment Contact:

Andrea Blomquist 916-774-5317 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.20.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance authorizing a budget adjustment in the amount of $220,000 split between the Electric Fund, Water Operations Fund, Wastewater Operations Fund and Waste Services Operations Fund to cover increased VISA transaction fees and higher paperless customer bill pay adoption volumes for utility services payments. There are adequate resources in these funds for this expenditure increase.

BACKGROUND
Roseville’s Customer Self Service (CSS) website offers customers a way to quickly view their account, pay their bills on-line, and many other self-service options. Customers can make payments immediately or schedule automatic monthly payments or pay-by-text. Recently, Roseville has experienced a significant increase in the volumes of customers choosing bill pay options such as one-time pay, autopay, and pay-by-text services for utility billing services. These services provide convenient payment options for our utility customers to pay their utility bills.

Additionally, the City was recently notified of an increase in VISA transaction fees per payment.

This budget adjustment of $220,000 is for the VISA credit card transaction fee increases and the increased paperless bill pay adoption costs.

FISCAL IMPACT
A budget adjustment allocating a total of $220,000 from the Electric Fund ($110,000), Water Operations Fund ($36,667), Wastewater Operations Fund ($36,667) and Waste Services Operations Fund ($36,666) is proposed to cover increased VISA transaction fees and higher paperless customer bill pay adoption volumes for utility services payments. There are adequate resources in these funds for this expenditure increase.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal D - Support economic vitality

Respectfully Submitted,
Andrea Blomquist, Utility Billing Operations Manager
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6736
Budget Adjustment
ORDINANCE NO. 6736

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-24, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment to cover increased VISA transaction fees and higher paperless customer bill pay adoption volumes for utility services payments.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this _ day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
1 REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Andrea Blomquist - Utility Billing Operations Manager FISCAL YEAR: 2024 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Emily Sawin - Administrative Technician COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 10/18/23 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Electric/Customer Care ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
6001 5301 70083 110,000
6101 5301 74183 36,667
6201 5301 74383 36,667
6301 5301 74283 36,666
220,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
220,000

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
6001 (110,000)
6101 (36,667)
6201 (36,667)
6301 (36,666)
(220,000)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

This budget adjustment is recommended to increase the expenditure budget in the Roseville Electric and Environmental Utilities funds to cover increased VISA transaction fees and higher paperless bill pay adoption costs for utility services payments.

Increase budget - VISA and paperless bill pay adoption
fees
Increase budget - VISA and paperless bill pay adoption
fees
TOTAL
TOTAL
Reduce available resources in the Waste Services Fund
Reduce available resources in the WW Ops Fund
TOTAL
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

ACCOUNT STRING

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Increase budget - VISA and paperless bill pay adoption
fees
Reduce available resources in the Electric Fund
Reduce available resources in the Water Ops Fund
Increase budget - VISA and paperless bill pay adoption
fees

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION

DESCRIPTION
EC
Daniel Beans (Sep 14, 2023 11:41 PDT)
9/18/23

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2992
File #:
0214 & 0716 & 0201-01
Title:

Institute of Museum and Library Services - Grant Award and Budget Adjustment Contact:

Natasha Martin 916-774-5234 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.21.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:
·
A
dopt a resolution to accept a $46,273 grant award from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, from their Inspire! Grant for Small Museums program; and ·
A
dopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment in the amount of $46,273 to create a new project for the expenditure of these funds for programs at the Maidu Museum & Historic Site.

BACKGROUND
The Maidu Museum & Historic Site recently applied for and was awarded $46,273 from the Institute of Museum and Library Services Inspire! Grant program. The grant will enable the Museum to provide a platform for local Native Americans to share their perspective, traditions, and contemporary culture through special monthly Museum programs. In collaboration with the Native Advisory Committee, museum staff will develop free monthly programs featuring local Native artists, authors, culture bearers, and scholars, and review submitted proposals from Native artists to feature three exhibits. The programs and events funded through this grant will improve the community’s cultural literacy regarding local Indigenous cultures by encouraging civil discourse among all community members and creating a safe and welcoming space for respectful public discussion. To measure the successful achievement of these goals, surveys will be collected after each program and from art exhibit visitors. Programming funded by this grant will begin in October 2023 and continue monthly through the grant cycle until August 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment for $46,273 in the City's Grants Fund will create a new project for the expenditure of these funds for programs at the Maidu Museum & Historic Site. This budget adjustment will offset $37,957 of General Fund labor costs, increasing available resources in the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Acceptance of a grant award and budget adjustment meets the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain Fiscally Responsible in a Changing World Goal B - Support Community Engagement and Advocacy
Goal E - Deliver Exceptional City Services

Respectfully Submitted,
Natasha Martin, City Librarian
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-411
Award Letter Inspire! Grant 2023
Notice of Action Inspire! Grant 2023
Ordinance 6737
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 23-411

ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM THE INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM

AND LIBRARY SERVICES

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville Maidu Museum & Historic Site recently applied for and was awarded $46,273 from the Institute of Museum and Library Services Inspire! Grant program; and

WHEREAS, the grant funds will enable the Museum to provide a platform for local Native Americans to share their perspective, traditions, and contemporary culture through special monthly Museum programs; and

WHEREAS, in collaboration with the Native Advisory Committee, museum staff will develop free monthly programs featuring local Native artists, authors, culture bearers, and scholars, and review submitted proposals from Native artists to feature three exhibits; and

WHEREAS, the programs and events funded through this grant will improve the community’s cultural literacy regarding local Indigenous cultures by encouraging civil discourse among all community members and creating a safe and welcoming space for respectful public discussion.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the City of Roseville accepts the grant award from the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as the grant recipient, the City of Roseville agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements related to the award.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

___________________________
City Clerk
August 1, 2023
IGSM-253127-OMS-23
Congratulations! We are delighted to confirm that your organization has been selected to receive a FY
2023
Inspire! Grants for Small Museums award.

This year we received
234
applications requesting
$10,181,891
. Of these, we selected
77 projects to receive funding totaling
$3,373,518
.

The important documents and information you will need to manage your award are available to you through eGMS Reach as follows.

Documents Tab
•
Official Award Notification for Grants and Cooperative Agreements . This
document confirms important information about your award, including the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); the start and end dates of the period of performance (Award Period); the Project Description; the Agency-Level Goals and Objectives; the Performance Measures; the dollar amounts of the award and the cost share, if any; the indirect cost rate, if any; and the people designated as the Authorizing Official, the Grant Administrator, and the Project Director.
•
Approved Budget
. This document is the official budget for your project. •
Reviewer Comments.

These are the comments and scores assigned by the peer
reviewers who evaluated your application. Please visit the Reviewer Resources

page of the IMLS website and look under your grant program ’
s name for more
information about the review criteria and scoring.
•
Managing Your IMLS Award.

This document outlines your responsibilities and
obligations as an IMLS awardee, identifies places to find important information, and summarizes best practices in award management.

Forms & Reports Tab
•
Reporting Schedule.

This document lists the due dates for your performance
and financial reports. You are responsible for submitting your reports according to this schedule.

GETTING STARTED
Here is what you need to do right away.
•
Make sure your
SAM
registration is current and that the associated banking

information is accurate. This is how IMLS transfers funds to your institution. •
Read the
General Terms and Conditions for IMLS Discretionary Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards for Awards Made After December 21, 2020 . This
document contains important information about complying with the terms of your award. Please read all this information carefully. •
Access the
Grantee Communications Kit
. This kit provides guidance for fulfilling
your requirements to acknowledge IMLS and for spreading the word about your award.
•
Bookmark and become familiar with the
Grant
Administration
page on the IMLS
website. This is where you will find
resources for using eGMS Reach
as well as
forms and instructions needed to prepare reports.

If you have any questions after reviewing these materials, please get in touch with Reagan Moore, Senior Program Officer, through
eGMS Reach
.

Congratulations once again on your award. All of us at IMLS are pleased to support your work and look forward to following the progress of your award. .
.

Federal Award ID Number (FAIN)
IGSM-253127-OMS-23
Award Recipient
Roseville, City of
For: Maidu Museum & Historic Site
Award Recipient Unique Entity
Identifier
W49TKZLUYCJ3
TIN:
946000409
Award Period
9/1/2023 - 8/31/2024
Budget Period
9/1/2023 - 8/31/2024
Assistance Listing Number/Title

45.301

Museums for America
Does the award support research and
development?
No
Project Title
Maidu Museum Inspire! Grant for Small Museums
Project Description
The Maidu Museum and Historic Site will provide a platform for local Native Americans to share their perspective, traditions, and contemporary culture with the greater Sacramento region by reviving the Night Out at the Museum program. In collaboration with the Native Advisory Committee, museum staff will develop free monthly programs featuring local Native artists, authors, culture bearers, and scholars, and review submitted proposals from Native artists to co-curate three exhibits. The project will improve the community ’
s
cultural literacy regarding local Indigenous cultures by encouraging civil discourse among all community members and creating a safe and welcoming space for respectful public discussion. To measure the successful achievement of these goals, surveys will be collected after each Night Out program and from art exhibits visitors to gather both qualitative and quantitative data.

Grant Program and Office
Inspire! Grants for Small Museums, Office of Museum Services Agency Level Goals and Objectives
Goal
1 : Champion Lifelong Learning
Objective

1.1 : Advance shared knowledge and learning opportunities for all Performance Measures
Effectiveness:

The extent to which activities contribute to achieving the intended results.

Efficiency:

How well resources are used while generating maximum value for the target group.

Quality:

How well the activities meet the requirements and expectations of the target group.

Timeliness:

The extent to which each task/activity is completed within the proposed timeframe.

AWARD AMOUNTS
Funds Obligated by this Action
$46,273.00
Total Outright Award Amount
$46,273.00
Total Cost Share
$0.00
Total Project Costs
$46,273.00
Indirect Cost Rate

0.00%
Role
Name
Affiliation
Authorizing
Official
Ms. Natasha Martin(NMartin)
[email protected]
City Librarian
Roseville, City of
Grant
Administrator
Ms. Kaitlin Kincade(KKincade)
[email protected]
Senior Interpretive Services Specialist
Roseville, City of
Project
Director
Ms. Kaitlin Kincade(KKincade)
[email protected]
Senior Interpretive Services Specialist
Roseville, City of

RECIPIENT CONTACTS

REMARKS
1 . The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) provides this grant support pursuant to 20 U.S.C. §
9101

et
Action Taken:

Award
Date of Action:
7/19/2023

FEDERAL AWARD INFORMATION
Award Date:
7/17/2023
Official Award Notification for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Institute of Museum and Library Services

seq
. and any related statutory authorities referenced in the Notice of Funding Opportunity or elsewhere. 2 . The administration of this award and the expenditure of award funds are subject to the General Terms and Conditions for IMLS Discretionary Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards (GTCs) as modified or supplemented by any special terms and conditions incorporated into this award. The GTCs for this award are located on the IMLS website and correspond to the award date of this award:

IMLS Grant Administration
. The GTCs incorporate by
reference the uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards promulgated by the Office of Management and Budget.

3. The award is made in support of the purposes set forth in the application or, if noted in the special terms and conditions of the award, in revised materials that have been approved by IMLS program staff.

4. The project supported by this award aligns with the specific agency-level goals and associated objectives and with grant program goals identified in the application.

AWARDING OFFICIAL
Laura Huerta Migus
Deputy Director, Office of Museum Services
Official Award Notification for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Institute of Museum and Library Services

ORDINANCE NO. 6737

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-24, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for a grant award from the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this ______________ day of _________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Natasha Martin, City Librarian FISCAL YEAR: FY2023-24 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Rendi Hodge, Management Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 10/18/2023 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Recreation & Libraries/Libraries ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2270 5080 84001 700058 37,957
2270 5301 84001 700058 5,000
2270 5351 84001 700058 466
2270 5387 84001 700058 1,725
2270 5461 84001 700058 1,125
1001 5980 58310 (37,957)
8,316

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2270 4401 84001 700058 46,273
46,273
(37,957)

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
1001 37,957
37,957
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
Establish budget for grant project #700058--Advertising Establish budget for grant project #700058--Training and Development
Establish budget for staff time reimbursed by grant
Increase project revenue from IMLS Inspire Grant

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

The Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) Department requests a budget adjustment of $46,273 to establish a federal Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS) Inspire Grant for the Maidu Museum and Historic Site, project 700058. Funding from this grant will prov ide free monthly programs featuring local Native artists, authors, culture bearers and scholars. Additionally, museum staff will work with Native artists to co-curate three exhibits. This project will improve the community's cultural literacy regarding local Indigenous cultures by encouraging participation among all community members. This budget adjustment will create a new project to appropriate grant funding for FY2023-24. This budget adjustment will offset labor costs, increasing available resources in the General Fund.

Establish budget for grant project #700058--Professional Services
Establish budget for grant project #700058--Secondary
Labor
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Increase available resources in the General Fund

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Establish budget for grant project #700058--Office
Supplies
9/29/202311:58 AM
1 09/29/2023

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3006
File #:
0323
Title:

Second Reading - Roseville Municipal Code Ordinances Regarding Parking Garage Restrictions
Contact:

Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]
Troy Bergstrom 916-774-5010 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.22.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 6740 AMENDING SECTION 10.58.100, AND ADDING SECTIONS

10.58.110 AND 10.58.120 TO CHAPTER 10.58 OF TITLE 10 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES, for second reading and adoption.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not applicable.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F – Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Travis Cochran, Deputy City Attorney
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6733
RMC 10.58 Ordinance - First Reading
Ordinance 6740
ORDINANCE NO. 6733

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.58 OF TITLE 10 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING

MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES, AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 4, 2023 AS AN URGENCY MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

10.58.100 Municipal parking facilities—Restrictions on use.

A. It is unlawful for any person to enter, be upon, or remain upon the premises of any parking garage, parking lot, parking structure, or other parking facility owned by the city, unless that person is on the premises for the purpose of parking a vehicle or retrieving a vehicle.

B. It is unlawful for any person to access, enter, or be upon, or to park or stand any vehicle within, any portion of a parking garage, parking lot, parking structure, or other parking facility owned by the city where access of persons or parking or standing of vehicles has been prohibited, limited, or restricted pursuant to Section 10.58.110.

C. It is unlawful for any person to park or stand any vehicle within any parking space or stall which is indicated by signage or other marking(s) to be reserved for a specific city official, employee, or department.

D. This section shall not apply to city employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or any other person specifically authorized by the city to enter any parking garage, parking lot, parking structure, or other parking facility owned by the city.

10.58.110 Prohibitions and limitations of parking.

Whenever the city manager or his or her designee determines that the orderly or efficient conduct of city business requires parking or standing of vehicles or access of any persons in any parking garage, parking lot, parking structure, or other parking facility owned by the city to be prohibited, limited, or otherwise restricted in any way, the city manager or his or her designee is authorized to enact such prohibitions, limitations, or restrictions for parking or standing of vehicles or access or any persons, and is further authorized to take all steps reasonably necessary to implement such prohibitions, limitations, or restrictions. Whenever the city manager or his or her designee enacts a prohibition, limitation, or restriction pursuant to this section, signage shall be installed, posted, or displayed in the area of the prohibition, limitation, or restriction that provides reasonably adequate notice that such parking or standing of vehicles or access of any persons has been prohibited, limited, or restricted.

10.58.120 Penalties for violation.

Violation of any provision of this chapter may be charged as an administrative citation, infraction, or misdemeanor, at the discretion of the City Attorney.

SECTION 2. Urgency Ordinance.

This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect October 4, 2023. A statement of urgency is as follows:

It is necessary to amend Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code to authorize the City Manager or his or her designee to enact and implement parking and access restrictions within city owned parking garages, lots, structures, and other parking facilities to facilitate the orderly or efficient conduct of city business, which are necessary for the protection of the public peace, health, and safety.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

2 ORDINANCE NO. ____

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION 10.58.100, AND ADDING SECTIONS 10.58.110 AND 10.58.120 TO CHAPTER

10.58 OF TITLE 10 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 10.58.100 of Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

10.58.100 Municipal parking facilities—Restrictions on use.

A. It is unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to enter, be upon, or remain upon the premises of any parking garage, parking lot, parking structure, or other parking facility owned by the city, unless that person is on the premises for the purpose of parking a vehicle or retrieving a vehicle. This section shall not apply to city employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or any other person authorized to enter by the city.

2 C. It is unlawful for any person to park or stand any vehicle within any parking space or stall which is indicated by signage or other marking(s) to be reserved for a specific city official, employee, or department.

SECTION 2. Section 10.58.110 of Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:

10.58.110 Prohibitions and limitations of parking.

Whenever the city manager or his or her designee determines that the orderly or efficient conduct of city business requires parking or standing of vehicles or access of any persons in any parking garage, parking lot, parking structure, or other parking facility owned by the city to be prohibited, limited, or otherwise restricted in any way, the city manager or his or her designee is authorized to enact such prohibitions, limitations, or restrictions for parking or standing of vehicles or access or any persons, and is further authorized to take all steps reasonably necessary to implement such prohibitions, limitations, or restrictions. Whenever the city manager or his or her designee enacts a prohibition, limitation, or restriction pursuant to this section, signage shall be installed, posted, or displayed in the area of the prohibition, limitation, or restriction that 3 provides reasonably adequate notice that such parking or standing of vehicles or access of any persons has been prohibited, limited, or restricted.

SECTION 3. Section 10.58.120 of Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:

10.58.120 Penalties for violation.

Violation of any provision of this chapter may be charged as an administrative citation, infraction, or misdemeanor, at the discretion of the City Attorney.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

4 ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 6740

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION 10.58.100, AND ADDING SECTIONS 10.58.110 AND 10.58.120 TO CHAPTER

10.58 OF TITLE 10 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 10.58.100 of Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

10.58.100 Municipal parking facilities—Restrictions on use.

SECTION 2. Section 10.58.110 of Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:

10.58.110 Prohibitions and limitations of parking.

Whenever the city manager or his or her designee determines that the orderly or efficient conduct of city business requires parking or standing of vehicles or access of any persons in any parking garage, parking lot, parking structure, or other parking facility owned by the city to be prohibited, limited, or otherwise restricted in any way, the city manager or his or her designee is authorized to enact such prohibitions, limitations, or restrictions for parking or standing of vehicles or access or any persons, and is further authorized to take all steps reasonably necessary to implement such prohibitions, limitations, or restrictions. Whenever the city manager or his or her designee enacts a prohibition, limitation, or restriction pursuant to this section, signage shall be installed, posted, or displayed in the area of the prohibition, limitation, or restriction that 2 provides reasonably adequate notice that such parking or standing of vehicles or access of any persons has been prohibited, limited, or restricted.

SECTION 3. Section 10.58.120 of Chapter 10.58 of Title 10 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:

10.58.120 Penalties for violation.

Violation of any provision of this chapter may be charged as an administrative citation, infraction, or misdemeanor, at the discretion of the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3002
File #:
0102-06
Title:

Proclamation - National Cybersecurity Awareness Month October 2023 Contact:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 7.23.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Proclaim October 2023 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month in Roseville and officially support the National Cybersecurity Awareness Month and the National Public Awareness Campaign “Stop.

Think. Connect.™” and call upon all employees, residents and visitors of Roseville to become educated about cybersecurity and put that knowledge into practice to keep our connected community safe from cyber threats.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Proclamation - National Cybersecurity Awareness Month October 2023

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2984
File #:
0214 & 0201-01
Title:

California Board of State and Community Corrections - Grant Award and Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected]
Brandon Fernandez 916-774-5095 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/18/2023
Item #: 8.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to accept a grant award from the California Board of State and Community Corrections in the amount of $609,147 and authorize the City Manager to execute the grant agreement on behalf of the City. Additionally, staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $647,960.

BACKGROUND
The Roseville Police Department was awarded $609,147 through the Board of State and Community Corrections, Organized Retail Theft (ORT) Grant Program. The Roseville Police Department was one of only 26 medium scope projects that received grant funding. The purpose of the Organized Retail Theft Grant is to support local law enforcement agencies in preventing and responding to organized retail theft, motor vehicle or motor vehicle accessory theft, or cargo theft.

Roseville has several high-end shopping centers, anchored by the Westfield Galleria at Roseville Mall and the Roseville Automall. Roseville also has an array of restaurants, entertainment venues, commercial spaces, and sprawling residential neighborhoods. These amenities attract residents from all over the region to our community. Unfortunately, those same amenities also attract a criminal element fixated on theft.

Since Roseville emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a resurgence in retail theft. Over the past year, Roseville has seen an average of 70 shoplifting incidents per month. Not only do thieves victimize our retailers, but they also target our residents and their vehicles. The Roseville Police Department will use grant funds to perform extra enforcement operations, increase the network of License Plate Reading (LPR) cameras within the City, and purchase investigative tools, software, and a bait vehicle.

Extra enforcement operations will allow the Police Department to focus efforts on known offenders and high-crime areas. Web-based software and an increased network of LPR cameras will allow officers to solve theft cases at a higher rate. The use of forensic and analytical tools will help identify additional co-conspirators within the theft organizations. Ultimately, the ORT Grant will increase the investigative capacity of the Roseville Police Department. The department anticipates achieving a higher level of success in both preventing theft-related activities and solving theft-related cases.

The Roseville Police Department has also agreed to work in partnership will our law enforcement partners and the Placer County District Attorney to provide staff and resources necessary to complete thorough investigations into organized retail theft. Our agencies will work to enhance the collaboration between law enforcement and business owners through increased communication, information sharing, and targeted enforcement efforts. Grant funding will allow the Roseville Police Department to hold those who engage in organized retail theft accountable, but also to provide support and resources to retailers and businesses affected by these crimes.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment will appropriate $609,147 of grant funding in the City's Grants Fund, and move $38,813 of the grant funding into the Fleet Services and Fleet Replacement Funds for the purchase and maintenance of a bait vehicle, for a total budget adjustment of $647,960. This budget adjustment will have no net impact on the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Acceptance of a grant award and approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Peinado, Management Analyst
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-404
ORT Grant Award Agreement
Ordinance 6734
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 23-404

ACCEPTING THE GRANT AWARD FROM

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

WHEREAS, the City has been awarded $609,147 from the State of California Department of General Services, Board of State and Community Corrections as part of their Organized Retail Theft Grant Program; and

WHEREAS, the purpose of the Organized Retail Theft Grant is to support local law enforcement agencies in preventing and responding to organized retail theft, motor vehicle or motor vehicle accessory theft, or cargo theft; and

WHEREAS, extra enforcement operations will allow the police department to focus efforts on known offenders and high-crime areas; and

WHEREAS, the Grant Agreement has been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the City accepts the grant award from the State of California Department of General Services, Board of State and Community Corrections and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Grant Agreement on behalf of the City.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as the grant recipient, the City of Roseville agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements related to the award.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

___________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES SCO ID:5227-BSCC-1166-23 STANDARD AGREEMENT AGREEMENT NUMBER PURCHASING AUTHORITY NUMBER (If Applicable) STD 213 (Rev 03/2019) BSCC 1166- 23

1. This Agreement is entered into between the Contracting Agency and the Contractor named below:

CONTRACTING AGENCY NAME

BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS

CONTRACTOR NAME
Roseville Police Department

2. The term of this Agreement is:

START DATE
OCTOBER 1, 2023

THROUGH END DATE
JUNE 1, 2027

3. The maximum amount of this Agreement is:
$609,147.00

4. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits, attachments, and appendices which ar e by this reference made a part of the Agreement.

EXHIBITS TITLE PAGES
Exhibit A Scope of Work 3
Exhibit B Budget Detail and Payment Provisions 4
Exhibit C General Terms and Conditions (04/2017) 4
Exhibit D

Special Terms and Conditions 5
Attachment 1* Organized Retail Theft Prevention Grant Program Request for Proposals * Attachment 2 Organized Retail Theft Prevention Grant Program Grant Proposal 41 Appendix A

Organized Retail Theft Grant Program Scoring Panel Roster 1 Appendix B Grantee Assurance for Non-Governmental Organizations 2 * This item is hereby incorporated by reference and can be viewed at: https://www.bscc.ca.gov/organized-retail-theft-grant-program/ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES HERETO.

CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR NAME (if other than an individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.) Roseville Police Department

CITY STATE ZIPCONTRACTOR BUSINESS ADDRESS
311 Vernon Street Roseville CA 95678

TITLE PRINTED NAME OF PERSON SIGNING
Dominick Casey City Manager

CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED


STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CONTRACTING AGENCY NAME

BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS

CONTRACTING AGENCY ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
2590 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200 Sacramento CA 95833

PRINTED NAME OF PERSON SIGNING TITLE
COLLEEN CURTIN Deputy Director

CONTRACTING AGENCY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED


CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES APPROVAL: EXEMPT PER SCM, VOLUME 1, CH. 4.06 Roseville PD
BSCC 1166-23

Page 1 of 3 ends

Roseville City CouncilOctober 18, 2023

Roseville City Council
October 18, 2023