Agenda packet — Roseville City Council, May 15, 2024 (part 3 of 6)

3. Whenever bucket machines are used, the bucketing process shall be done in one pipeline segment at a time. A bucket of proper size shall be placed in the downstream manhole and pulled at intervals toward the upstream manhole until the entire pipeline segment has been cleaned. Mechanically powered equipment such as bucket machines shall be provided in pairs and shall be belt-driven or employ an overload device.

4. Upon completion of the bucketing/rodding operation, high-velocity sewer cleaning equipment shall be used to ensure that all sand, grease, and other fine materials have been removed. Satisfactory precautions shall be taken to protect the pipelines from damage that might be inflicted by the improper use of cleaning equipment.

33 01 21-5
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

G. When the CONTRACTOR deems an adequate number of passes has been completed to remove all foreign materials, CONTRACTOR shall conduct CCTV inspection for confirmation of removal of foreign materials along entire pipe segment per Section 33 01 31.

H. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for water used for sewer cleaning operation. The CONTRACTOR may contact the CITY to obtain approval to use water and a water meter to calculate quantities in accordance with CITY’s requirements. When the CONTRACTOR has been authorized to take water from fire hydrants:

1. The water shall be conserved and not used unnecessarily.

2. Only approved fire hydrant wrenches and shut off valves shall be used.

3. A visible air gap shall be maintained between the discharge of the fire hose and the CONTRACTOR’s water storage tank. The air gap shall be visible from the ground surface.

4. No fire hydrant shall be obstructed except to refill empty water tanks.

I. Passing materials from manhole to manhole pipeline segment, which could cause line stoppage, accumulations of sand in wet wells or damage to pumping equipment, shall not be permitted. All solids or semi-solid material removed from the wastewater collection system during the cleaning operation shall be trapped and removed from the downstream manhole of the pipeline segment being cleaned and disposed of off-site in a lawful manner utilizing a vacuum truck. Disposal may occur free of charge at the applicable wastewater treatment plant.

J. After cleaning the sewer mainline, the CONTRACTOR shall spray or wash down the interior walls of each manhole with a nozzle or gun using approximately 500 psi of water.

1. Where the sewer is not adequately cleaned as determined by the ENGINEER through television inspection review, CONTRACTOR shall remove all equipment or materials from the sewer and re-clean the sewer at no additional expense to the CITY.

2. CONTRACTOR shall take care not to damage existing manhole wall with high pressure water cleaning activities.

3. If existing manhole shows significant structural deterioration, CONTRACTOR shall report location and provide picture of condition to ENGINEER at end of work day.

+ + END OF SECTION + +

33 01 21-6
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

33 01 21-1
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 33 01 21

SEWER PIPELINE CLEANING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 DESCRIPTION
A. The intent of sewer pipeline cleaning is to remove foreign materials from the line prior to CCTV inspection and subsequent pipe bursting per Specification Section 33 05 26.

Since the success of this phase of work depends a great deal on the cleanliness of the lines, the importance of this phase of the operation is emphasized. It is recognized that there may be some conditions such as broken pipe and major blockages that prevent cleaning from being accomplished some of which are noted in the Drawings or where additional damage would result if cleaning were attempted or continued. Should such conditions be encountered, the CONTRACTOR will notify the ENGINEER before finalizing the decision to not complete mechanical cleaning on the pertinent pipeline.

1.2 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit for approval, prior to commencement of work, a list of sewer cleaning equipment to be used including manufacturers’ specifications for each piece of equipment (e.g., truck) and its associated tools (e.g., nozzles).

1.3 QUALIFICATIONS
A. Pre-qualification shall require that the contracting company and the job supervisor each have a minimum of three (3) years experience in the performance of the type of work specified and shall have specifically performed at least 100,000 feet of cleaning w ithin the past three years. A company with less than three (3) years experience may pre - qualify if they can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER that they have the capabilities, overall experience, equipment, and expertise to satisfactorily complete the project in accordance with these specifications. Documentation supporting the minimum experience of the contracting company shall be submitted with the proposal.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 CLEANING EQUIPMENT
A. The equipment shall be capable of removing dirt, grease, rocks, sand, roots, and other materials and obstructions from sewer lines and manholes. Alternatives to equipment described herein require approval by ENGINEER prior to commencing work. The following requirements for the cleaning equipment must be met:

33 01 21-2
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

B. High-velocity hydraulic equipment (hydroflusher) shall be truck or trailer mounted. The equipment shall carry a nominal 800 gallon minimum water tank and have a minimum of 650 feet of high-pressure hose with a selection of two or more cleaning nozzles. The equipment shall be capable of supplying water at minimum 30 gallons per minute at a minimum working pressure of 750 pounds per square inch (psi), and regulated to not exceed a maximum pressure of 1,500 psi. All controls shall be located so that the equipment can be operated above ground at minimal interference to existing traffic and/or danger to the operator.

1. The nozzles shall be capable of producing a scouring action for any pipeline size scheduled to be cleaned.

2. Hydraulically propelled equipment such as root saws or rotating chain flails may be used upon approval by ENGINEER for each line segment.

3. Hydraulically propelled equipment such as sewer balls or movable dams shall not be used.

4. Due to possible accessibility constraints, additional lengths of high -pressure hose may be required.

5. It shall be CONTRACTOR’s responsibility to provide all equipment required to complete cleaning work.

C. Vacuum truck shall be a minimum 27-inch mercury (high-vacuum unit) with a positive displacement blower, which produces a minimum of 3500 CFM air flow, 8 -inch suction tubes, and 16 cubic yards of hauling capacity for debris and water mixture.

2.2 MECHANICAL CLEANING EQUIPMENT
A. Alternative mechanically powered cleaning equipment proposed for use by CONTRACTOR shall require approval by CITY and/or CITY’s Representative (e.g.

ENGINEER) prior to commencing work. Examples include, but are not limited to, power rodding machines and bucket machines.

B. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any damage to the sewer or any service connections as a result of using mechanically powered cleaning equipment, including rehabilitation and/or replacement of sewer pipeline to CITY’s satisfaction.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 SAFETY
A. Conduct operations during all phases of work to ensure public safety and in such a manner as to cause as little inconvenience as possible to the traveling public and abutting property owners. Convenient access to driveways, houses, and buildings along the line of work shall be maintained.

33 01 21-3
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

B. Submit a site -specific Health and Safety Plan for the work to be performed in accordance with OSHA requirements.

C. CONTRACTOR shall follow all manufacturer’s instructions/recommendations for operation and maintenance of cleaning equipment and related appurtenances.

D. Precautions shall be taken to ensure that the water pressure created does not damage or cause flooding of public or private property being served by the sewer.

3.2 CLEANING
A. Flush and clean pipeline interiors to remove sludge, dirt, sand, grit, stone, grease, roots, and other materials from pipe such that successful CCTV inspection of the pipes outlined in the Drawings can be performed per Specification Section 33 01 31, Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection.

B. A minimum of one operator and one laborer shall be at the job site at all times when cleaning is being performed.

C. Selection of the equipment to be used shall be based on the conditions of the pipeline segment at the time the work commences and in accordance with the requirements within this specification.

D. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for and repair any damage caused by their operations at no additional cost to the CITY and to the CITY’s satisfaction.

E. High-velocity Hydraulic Cleaning:

1. All hydraulic cleaning equipment shall be truck mounted. Water jet cleaning equipment shall include a water tank, auxiliary engine, pumps, and hydraulically driven hose reel. The CONTRACTOR shall provide a minimum of 650 feet of high - pressure hose.

2. CONTRACTOR shall provide a selection of high velocity nozzles, each having a flow capacity and working pressure necessary to clean the pipe thoroughly while preventing sewer backups and impacts to nearby residences. Pressure to the nozzle shall be regulated by a relief valve to prevent backing up into existing structures.

3. Nozzles shall be capable of producing a jet stream angle of 15 to 45 degrees from the horizontal. The CONTRACTOR shall also provide a high velocity gun with sufficient discharge and pressure to thoroughly clean manhole interiors.

4. CONTRACTOR shall clean contiguous pipe segments in order from upstream to downstream.

5. When hydraulic cleaning equipment is used for the purpose of completing scheduled cleaning, the CONTRACTOR shall clean the pipeline with as many passes of a high -

33 01 21-4
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

velocity hydraulic cleaning machine as necessary until all debris is removed from the pipe.
a. CONTRACTOR shall subdivide individual manhole to manhole pipe segments into partial segments no more than 100-foot in length and clean downstream partial segment first then next upstream partial segment all the way to downstream manhole and continue this p rocedure until cleaning of entire manhole to manhole segment is complete.

6. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to plan and control the cleaning operations to prevent flooding and/or damage of the sewers and manholes, and to prevent backflow into building structures through sewers and/or laterals.

F. Whenever lines to be cleaned show evidence of being more than one -half filled with solids at the upstream or downstream manhole, and removal of said solids is not possible with handheld tools such as scoops, shovels, and/or clam shovels, bucket machines or power rodding machines shall be utilized to remove most of the materials before hydraulic equipment is brought into use for finishing the cleaning of the pipeline.

As previously stated in Paragraph 2.2, the CONTRACTOR shall acquire approval by CITY or CITY’s Representative prior to commencing work with bucket machines or power rodding machines.

1. If bucket or rodding machine is required and approved, that equipment shall be run the entire length of the manhole to manhole segment until CONTRACTOR deems solids level is low enough such that additional passes of a high velocity hydraulic cleaning machine will complete cleaning.

2. Power rodding machines shall be a "continuous rod" type capable of rodding distances of up to 650 feet in one setup. Rodding machines shall have the ability to spin the rod either clockwise or counterclockwise and be able to be pushed straight out or pulled back without rotating the machine. It shall be capable of pulling pipe- size swabs or brushes back through the sewer for cleaning and flushing purposes.

The rodding machine shall have a positive drive and shall be capable of producing a 2000-pound pull. The rod shall be specifically designed for use with the rodding machine.

3. Whenever bucket machines are used, the bucketing process shall be done in one pipeline segment at a time. A bucket of proper size shall be placed in the downstream manhole and pulled at intervals toward the upstream manhole until the entire pipeline segmen t has been cleaned. Mechanically powered equipment such as bucket machines shall be provided in pairs and shall be belt -driven or employ an overload device.

4. Upon completion of the bucketing/rodding operation, high -velocity sewer cleaning equipment shall be used to ensure that all sand, grease, and other fine materials have been removed. Satisfactory precautions shall be taken to protect the pipelines from damage that might be inflicted by the improper use of cleaning equipment.

33 01 21-5
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

1. The water shall be conserved and not used unnecessarily.

2. Only approved fire hydrant wrenches and shut off valves shall be used.

3. A visible air gap shall be maintained between the discharge of the fire hose and the CONTRACTOR’s water storage tank. The air gap shall be visible from the ground surface.

4. No fire hydrant shall be obstructed except to refill empty water tanks.

I. Passing materials from manhole to manhole pipeline segment, which could cause line stoppage, accumulations of sand in wet wells or damage to pumping equipment, shall not be permitted. All solids or semi -solid material removed from the wastewater collection system during the cleaning operation shall be trapped and removed from the downstream manhole of the pipeline segment being cleaned and disposed of off-site in a lawful manner utilizing a vacuum truck. Disposal may occur free of charge at the applicable wastewater treatment plant.

J. After cleaning the sewer mainline, the CONTRACTOR shall spray or wash down the interior walls of each manhole with a nozzle or gun using approximately 500 psi of water.

2. CONTRACTOR shall take care not to damage existing manhole wall with high pressure water cleaning activities.

3. If existing manhole shows significant structural deterioration, CONTRACTOR shall report location and provide picture of condition to ENGINEER at end of work day.

+ + END OF SECTION + +

33 01 21-6
Sewer Pipeline Cleaning
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

33 01 31-1
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 33 01 31

SEWER PIPELINE CCTV INSPECTION
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 DESCRIPTION
A. The intent of Sewer Pipeline CCTV inspection is to verify existing sewer pipeline conditions prior to repair and rehabilitation techniques as well as verify successful application after the work is completed . These CCTV inspections will be designated “field verification CCTV inspection” and “post-installation CCTV inspection”

1.2 SUMMARY
A. Technical Specification Section Includes:

1. Pipeline flushing and cleaning.

2. Closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection of sewer pipelines.

3. Audio-video taping of pipeline interior.

1.3 REFERENCES
A. Electronics Industries Association (EIA).

B. National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (PACP).

1.4 DEFINITIONS
A. Field Verification CCTV Inspections:

1. CCTV inspection for verifying the condition of the existing sewer pipeline prior to the Work including locating all service laterals . This shall include an inspection before and after any repairs that alter the condition of the pipe that has the potential to affect the Work to be done as specified in the Drawings and specifications.

B. Post Installation CCTV Inspection:

1. CCTV inspection for verifying the successful installation per section 3.8 of Specification 33 05 26, Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting

1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit to the ENGINEER a contact name and phone number for the CONTRACTOR’s designated representative who will be on -site during cleaning and inspection work.

33 01 31-2
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

Additionally, submit a secondary contact name and phone number for the designated representative’s backup.

B. Submit for approval, prior to commencement of work, a list of video camera equipment to be used including manufacturers’ specifications for each camera type.

C. Submit site-specific Health and Safety Plan.

1.6 QUALIFICATIONS
A. Experienced and pre -qualified personnel utilizing equipment and materials meeting the requirements of these specifications shall perform all work.

B. Pre-qualification shall require that the CCTV inspection company and the job supervisor each have a minimum of three (3) years experience in the performance of the type of work specified and shall have specifically performed at least 100,000 feet of television inspection within the past three years. A company with less than three (3) years experience may pre -qualify if they can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER that they have the capabilities, overall experience, equipment, and expertise to satisfactorily complete the project in accordance with these specifications. Documentation supporting the minimum experience of the contracting company shall be submitted to the CITY.

C. Camera Operator must have current National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (PACP) certification.

1. Camera operator must have a minimum two years experience and 50,000 linear feet of CCTV inspection work using the NASSCO PACP program.

2. CONTRACTOR shall provide to ENGINEER written confirmation certifying Camera Operator:
a. Meets experience requirements; and
b. Possesses current PACP certification.

1.7 COORDINATION
A. Coordinate on a daily basis and make provisions to ensure the ENGINEER is present whenever CCTV inspection work is being performed. While it is understood that the ENGINEER(s) may not always be present, the CONTRACTOR understands that the ENGINEER(s) may be present at various points during the work to verify that the quality requirements are adhered to throughout the Work.

B. If CCTV inspection work reveals any defects or conditions that would prevent the rehabilitation work to be done that is not called out in the Drawings the CONTRACTOR will immediately contact the ENGINEER via telephone or person -to-person correspondence to make them aware of the condition. CONTRACTOR shall move on to other pipelines, continuing work uninterrupted.

33 01 31-3
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

C. If for any reason the CONTRACTOR anticipates that a defect could result in a Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) within twenty -four (24) hours, the CONTRACTOR will immediately contact the ENGINEER via telephone or person -to-person correspondence to make them aware of the condition.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 CCTV INSPECTION EQUIPMENT
A. The television camera used for the inspection shall be one specifically designed and constructed for operation in connection with sewer inspection and capable of operating in 100 percent humidity conditions.

B. Cameras used for CCTV inspection of pipelines six inches (6”) in diameter and larger shall be of the articulating head type. The camera head shall have a 360 -degree radial view rotating head capable of rotating to view laterals, joints, and defects directly.

C. The television camera used for the inspection shall be in color format specifically designed and constructed for such inspections. Lighting and video quality shall be suitable to allow a clear and focused picture clearly showing the entire inside periphery of the sanitary sewer pipeline for a minimum of six lineal feet ahead of the camera.

D. The camera shall have a minimum capability of 600 lines of horizontal resolution at center; optimum imagery with minimum illumination; and meet requirements of EIA Standard Video Signal.

E. The camera shall be equipped with a remote variable intensity control of the camera lights with remote control adjustments for focus and iris located at the monitoring station to ensure peak picture quality throughout all conditions encountered during the survey.

F. Focal distance shall be adjustable for cameras used to inspect pipelines six inches (6”) in diameter and larger.

G. Camera monitors shall be located where the ENGINEER can view the monitor and make notes in addition to the operating technician. Monitors shall have a resolution capability of no less than 600 lines of horizontal resolution.

H. Each CCTV inspection unit shall contain a means to transport the CCTV camera in a stable condition (e.g. mounted on skids, mounted on transporter, etc.) through the sewer under survey and/or inspection conditions. Such equipment shall ensure the maintained location of the CCTV camera when used independently on or near to the central axis of a circular shaped sewer pipe.

33 01 31-4
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

I. Each CCTV inspection unit shall carry sufficient numbers of guides and rollers such that, when surveying or inspecting, all bonds are supported away from pipe and manhole structures and all CCTV cables and/or lines used to measure the CCTV camera’s location within the sewer are maintained in a taut manner and set at right angles where possible, to run through or over the measuring equipment.

J. The date of the survey, the identifying number (or location) of the beginning and ending manholes for the pipeline being surveyed, and a continuous forward and reverse read -out of the camera distance from the manhole of reference shall be continuously displayed on the monitors as part of the video presentation. The remote reading footage counter shall be accurate to within two-tenths of a foot.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 SEQUENCING
A. Refer to Section 01 1 4 03, Special Project Constraints and Section 33 05 26, Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting regarding the required sequencing of Field Verification CCTV Inspections, pipeline cleaning, and Post-installation CCTV inspections.

B. If there is a known spot -repair required based on the Drawings, conduct a CCTV inspection prior to initiating the repair to confirm the location and extent of repair required. Following completion of the spot repair, complete one more field verification CCTV inspection prior to the Work.

C. If field verification CCTV inspection reveals any previously unknown required spot repairs, complete spot repairs, then re -CCTV the line prior to the Work. Any required spot repair work that was not shown on the Drawings shall be confirmed with the ENGINEER and CITY prior to completing and the work will be completed as a Change Order to the Contract.

3.2 SAFETY
A. Conduct operations during all phases of work to ensure public safety and in such a manner as to cause as little inconvenience as possible to the traveling public and abutting property owners. Convenient access to driveways, houses, and buildings along the line of work shall be maintained.

B. Submit a site -specific Health and Safety Plan for the work to be performed in accordance with OSHA requirements.

3.3 PREPARATION
A. Verify location of sewer pipelines to be inspected. Due to potential site constraints, the CONTRACTOR shall review the project site locations for accessibility.

33 01 31-5
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

B. Exercise caution when conducting work so as not to cause damage to private property. CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for any damage caused to private property and shall repair any such damage to a level approved by the ENGINEER at no additional cost.

C. Upon completion of work, CONTRACTOR shall restore the area to pre -existing conditions and (if possible) notify the property owner when leaving the area.

D. CONTRACTOR shall document pre-inspection and post-inspection conditions of private properties with digital photographs.

1. Disputes with property owners will be settled through the use of photos that will document pre -inspection conditions. In the event that the Contractor fails to adequately document pre-construction conditions, the Contractor will be obligated to restore disputed landscaping, yards, improvements, etc. to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER.

3.4 PIPELINE CLEANING
A. All pipelines are to be cleaned per Specification 33 01 21 and Section 33 05 26 prior to the Work . Sequencing of the cleaning with respect to the completion of CCTV inspection work shall be left to the means and methods of the CONTRACTOR.

3.5 INSPECTION – PIPELINE
A. Furnish all materials, labor, equipment, power, and maintenance to complete CCTV inspection of the scheduled pipeline segments.

B. Televise all pipeline segments completely from starting manhole to ending manhole on the same video in a continuous run. Partial televising on one video and then completing the run on another is unacceptable unless an impassible condition is encountered and properly documented, and a “reverse set -up” completed. The camera shall travel in the direction of the flow in the pipeline segment (i.e., downstream) unless there is no access to the upstream manhole or when a flushing inlet exists at the upstream end of the pipeline or when completing a “reverse set - up”. “Reverse set -ups” for convenience are not acceptable, unless pre -approved by ENGINEER at the ENGINEER’s discretion. Cost of “reverse set -up” shall be included within CONTRACTOR’s bid. No additional payment shall be made for a line requiring a “reverse set-up”.

C. If, during the inspection, the television camera will not pass through the entire line segment as a result of offset joints, broken pipe, protruding taps, or other obstructions, the CONTRACTOR shall set up his equipment so that the inspection can be performed from the destination manhole or other access points (i.e., a “reverse set-up”).

D. If, during the inspection, the viewable portion of the pipe is reduced to less than 80% of the interior pipe diameter due to submerged lines or sags, the CONTRACTOR shall

33 01 31-6
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

vacuum clean or jet flush the line to remove or lower the standing water level and proceed concurrently with the television inspection. In the event the CONTRACTOR is still unable to televise the entire line and has demonstrated to the ENGINEER that every reasonable effort has been made to dewater the pipeline, the CONTRACTOR will complete the inspection to the best of their ability in the reduced viewable pipe diameter condition and move on to the next setup.

E. The travel speed of the camera shall be uniform and shall not exceed 30 feet per minute. Any means of propelling the camera through the pipeline that would exceed this rate of speed or produce non -uniform or jerky movements shall not be acceptable. The camera shall be stopped and/or backed up to view and analyze apparent defects and unusual or uncommon conditions within the pipeline.

1. Self-propelled cameras, manual winches, power winches, cable, and powered rewinds or other devices that do not obstruct the camera view or interfere with proper documentation of the sewer conditions shall be used to move the camera through the pipeline segment.

2. In no case shall the hose of a high -velocity water cleaning machine be allowed for use as a tow cable.

F. Stop the camera a minimum of five (5) seconds at every lateral to look up the center of the lateral and see any apparent defects, such as broken pipes, root intrusions, or other defects that would inhibit the rehabilitation work to be done . The lens and lighting shall be readjusted, if necessary, in order to ensure a clear, distinct, and properly lighted feature.

G. Minimize the amount of recorded video beyond the required time at each observation when the camera is stationary. Utilize a pause feature (or similar) within the video recording device to limit the amount of recorded video resulting from non -inspection related activities (e.g., adjustment of camera/lighting settings, equipment monitoring/adjustment).

H. Take still digital photos of all laterals, defects, and observations noted on the CCTV inspection report.

3.6 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
A. Provide an acceptable picture that is in focus, distinct, clear, and properly illuminated, with good contrast and without distortion. The picture shall be of true and adequate color and tint, free from interference and distortion.

B. The picture shall show at least 80% of the pipe periphery above the waterline. All recording shall be in color achieving and maintaining proper balance of tint and brightness.

C. The picture shall have adequate light to clearly ascertain any pipeline defects like cracks and their severity in addition to clearly seeing other features like laterals and joints.

33 01 31-7
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

D. The camera lens shall be kept clean and clear of any fogging due to oil, grease, or other material or debris. Material that obscures the lens shall be cleaned off before proceeding with the recording operation.

E. If debris or other obstructions cause reduced visibility, or if the image is obscured, the CONTRACTOR shall make reasonable attempts to clear the lens of the camera before continuing inspection.

F. The importance of accurate distance measurement is emphasized. The accuracy of the remote reading footage counter shall be verified by use of a walking meter, roll -a- tape, or other suitable device to the approval of the ENGINEER prior to the commencement of the Work.

G. Other unacceptable conditions that shall serve as a cause for rejection of submitted videos include, but are not necessarily limited to:

1. The loss of color or severe redness due to equipment malfunction and black -and- white pictures irrespective of quality.

2. Loss of vertical hold which impacts the ability to read and interpret the video.

3. Incorrect manhole identifications, or if it is not clear which line has been televised.

4. Inaccurate footage readings during any portion of the inspection.

5. Any other unidentifiable defect such as equipment interference, equipment malfunction, and blurred or obscured images from an unknown source that detracts from the ability to read the video with reliable accuracy.

3.7 RETRIEVAL OF EQUIPMENT
A. CONTRACTOR shall retrieve television camera equipment stuck or lost in mains immediately at the time of incident. CITY personnel and equipment are not available to assist the CONTRACTOR in the retrieval of equipment. Following the retrieval of the camera equipment, the pipeline shall be restored according to current applicable standards and to the approval of the ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for all private and public property restoration to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER. No additional compensation will be made for any costs associated with retrieval of equipment.

3.8 CCTV INSPECTION REPORTS
A. CCTV inspections shall be evaluated against the video for accuracy and completeness, prior to submittal to ENGINEER for acceptance.

B. BUSlink USB 2.0 External Hard Drive (or ENGINEER approved equal) containing the following shall be submitted to the ENGINEER within two (2) weeks of the inspection.

ENGINEER shall return the external hard drive within one week of submittal:

33 01 31-8
Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

1. Video imagery with audio track containing simultaneously recorded narrative commentary describing in detail condition of pipeline interior. a. Video shall be captured in MPEG (.mpg) format.

2. Digital still photography of every observation.
a. Digital photos shall be in JPEG (.jpg) format.

C. All submitted data shall become the property of the CITY upon completion of the project.
+ + END OF SECTION + +

33 05 13-1
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 33 05 13

HYBRID PVC SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 SCOPE
A. This specification shall govern for the furnishing of all work necessary to accomplish and complete the installation of a PVC Sanitary Sewer Manhole (SSMH) , comprising fiberglass reinforced plastic lined concrete sanitary sewer maintenance access base and top sections, a polyvinyl chloride riser section and all appurtenances. The PVC SSMH shall be corrosion, abrasion, inflow and infiltration resistant.

B. The PVC Sanitary Sewer Manhole shall be modular and shall include the following main components:

C. Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) concrete protective liners for SSMH base and top sections, including all appurtenances. Liners shall be non-structural units, constructed of fiberglass reinforced unsaturated polyester resin, third -party certified for wastewater infrastructure use, designed to provide a gastight and watertight homogenous barrier that protects the concrete SSMH base and top sections from corrosion, abrasion, inflow and infiltration. FRP liners shall be manufactured by Predl Systems North America Inc., Burnaby, BC.

D. Concrete SSMH base and top sections, cast around the FRP concrete protective liners.

Concrete base and top sections shall be ASTM C478 compliant and manufactured by Diamond Precast Concrete Ltd., Burnaby, BC or a Predl Systems certified precast facility.

E. PVC riser section shall be AWWA C900 compliant, DR -51 pressure class PVC pipe, manufactured by Diamond Plastics Corp., Grand Island, NE.

F. ASTM C990 compliant elastomeric sealant and ASTM C877 compliant external joint wrap, for the purpose of joining the lined concrete base, PVC riser and lined concrete top SSMH sections, supplied by others.

1.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
A. Configuration:

The SSMH base section shall include an FRP Baseliner and the SSMH top section will include an FRP Top Liner with integral Access Collar and Gasket, to accept and an FRP Telescoping access Tube. Each prefabricated FRP liner component shall be constructed from one piece homogenous composite and/or thermoplastic with minimum thickness of 3 mm (1/8”). FRP concrete protective liners shall be non-structural elements.

1. FRP Baseliners: Each SSMH Baseliner shall include:
a) Full flow channels with side walls to the crown of the pipe(s) or above; b) A non-skid pattern on inner bench surfaces;

33 05 13-2
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

c) Gasketed, flexible and watertight, bell type, pipe connections for specific pipe types to receive the collection pipes at the exact angles and slopes as specified on Contract Documents.

The Bells shall be monolithically attached to the SSMH base liner channels, be integral to the Baseliner and have a water stop on the outside and a pipe stop on the inside that matches the diameter and wall thickness of the collection pipe and ensure that the flow line from the pipe stop to the inside channels are smooth and without obstruction. The Bells shall conform to the outside and inside curve of the SSMH walls.

The Baseliner shall have a spigot or bell type joint facing the PVC riser tube and connecting to the inside or outside of the PVC riser, respectively. An ASTM C990 compliant butyl rubber sealant, such as ConSeal CS-102, shall be used in the joint interface. An ASTM C877 compliant external joint wrap, such as ConSeal CS -212, shall be used to seal the joint from the outside.

2. FRP Top Liner with integral Access Collar and Gasket: The FRP Top Liner component shall provide concrete protection from corrosion, abrasion, inflow and infiltration for the SSMH cone section and shall feature an integral FRP Access Collar and Gasket at the manway opening, to receive an FRP Telescoping Access Tube.

The FRP Top Liner shall either have cone or flat top configuration depending on the requirements of Contract Documents.

The Top Liner shall have a spigot or bell type joint facing the PVC riser tube and connecting to the inside or outside of the PVC riser, respectively. An ASTM C990 compliant butyl rubber sealant, such as ConSeal CS-102, shall be used in the joint interface. An ASTM C877 compliant external joint wrap, such as ConSeal CS -212, shall be used to seal the joint from the outside.

3. Telescoping Access Tube: The FRP Telescoping Access Tube shall provide concrete protection from corrosion, abrasion, inflow and infiltration for the manway entry section, between the casting at the finished grade and top of the SSMH top section.

The Telescoping Access Tube shall accommodate grading adjustments up to 12” of height.

B. Dimensions:

1. FRP Baseliners and Top Liners shall have outside diameters of 51”, 58” and 61.75”, corresponding substantially to the outside diameters of 48”, 54” and 60” C900 DR-51 PVC pressure pipes. Tolerance on the outside diameter shall be +/ - 1%. Other diameters, as agreed upon between purchaser and the manufacturer, are covered by this specification.

2. FRP Baseliners and Top Liners shall have spigot joint diameters of 48.80”, 55.30” and

59.19”, corresponding to the inside diameters of 48”, 54” and 60” C900 DR-51 PVC pressure pipes. Tolerance on the spigot joint diameter shall be +0/ -0.125”. Other diameters, as agreed upon between purchaser and the manufacturer, are covered by this specification.

33 05 13-3
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

3. Allowable tolerance for Baseliner invert elevations shall be 0.125” and 2% for pipe slope.

4. Access Collars and Telescopic Access Tube shall accommodate manway openings of 24”, 27”, 32” or 36”. Telescopic Access Tube shall have a nominal height of 15”.

Access Collars can be either eccentric or concentric.

C. Marking and Identification
Baseliner shall be marked with the following information:

1) Manufacturer’s identification
2) Nominal diameter
3) Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Access (SSMH) identification 4) Detailed invert configuration
5) Installation assist marks molded into the Baseliner

All other components shall be marked with the following information:

1) Manufacturers Identification
2) Nominal Diameter
3) Installation assist marks, if applicable

1.3 HANDLING AND STORAGE
A. FRP SSMH liners must not be dropped or impacted. When stored for extended periods (more than a few days) Baseliners shall be stored on a flat surface, upside down to minimize deformation. Baseliners shall not be exposed to direct sunlight for extended periods.

PART 2 - REFERENCES

2.1 REFERENCES
Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Access liners shall conform to the following design criteria:

A. ASTM D395: Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property-Compression Set B. ASTM D412: Standard Test Methods for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers-Tension
C. ASTM D471: Standard Test Method for Rubber Property-Effect of Liquids D. ASTM D543: Standard Practices for Evaluating the Resistance of Plastics to Chemical Reagents
E. ASTM D573: Standard Test Method for Rubber- Deterioration in an Air Oven F. ASTM D624: Standard Test Method for Tear Strength of Conventional Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers
G. ASTM D638: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics H. ASTM D695: Test Methods for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics I. ASTM D790: Test Metho for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and electrical Insulating Materials
J. ASTM D792: Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement

33 05 13-4
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

K. ASTM D1149: Standard Test Methods for Rubber Deterioration- Cracking in an Ozone Controlled Environment
L. ASTM D2137: Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property – Brittleness Point of Flexible Polymers and Coated Fabrics
M. ASTM D2240: Standard Test Method for Rubber Property – Durometer Hardness N. ASTM D2584: Test Method for Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced Resins O. ASTM D4060: Standard Method for Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coati ngs by the Taber Abraser
P. Greenbook 2009 (or later): Standard Specifications for Public Works Con struction, Chemical Resistance Test (Pickle Jar Test)

2.1 SUBMITTALS
A. Conform to bid document requirements
B. Submit manufacturer’s data and details of following items for approval:

1. Shop drawings of SSMH sections, base units and construction details, jointing methods, materials, and dimensions

2. Summary of criteria used in SSMH design including, as minimum, material properties, loading criteria, and dimensions assumed. Include certification from manufacturer that polymer concrete SSMH design meets or exceeds the load and strength requirements of ASTM C 478 and ASTM C 857, reinforced in accordance with ACI 440.1R-15. Include current ISO 9001:2008 certification

3. Frames, grates, rings, and covers

4. Materials to be used in fabricating pipe drop connections

5. Materials to be used for pipe connections

6. Materials to be used for stubs and stub plugs, if required

7. Proof of independent Chemical Resistance testing conducted in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (California Greenbook) Section 211-2

8. Submitted sealed drawings by a registered Professional Engineer PART 3 - PRODUCTS

3.1 FRP LINERS, BELLS, GASKETS, MECHANICAL DEVICES, CONCRETE, AND THIRD-PARTY

ACCESSORIES
A. FRP liner body: The resins used shall be unsaturated, supplier certified, commercial grade polyester resins. Mixing lots of resins from different manufacturers o r “odd - lotting” of resins shall not be permitted. Quality-assurance records on the resin shall be maintained.

The reinforcing materials shall be commercial grade “E -CR” type glass, specially formulated for corrosive environments, in the form of mat, chopped roving, continuous roving, continuous roving, roving fabric or a combination of the above, having a coupling agent that will provide a suitable bond between the glass reinforcement and resin.

Fiberglass and/or polypropylene ribs and/or structural members may be utilized to meet the design criteria.

No inert fillers shall be used. Additives, such as thixotropic agents, catalysts, promoters, etc., may be added as required by the specific manufacturing process to be used to

33 05 13-5
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

meet the requirements of this standard.

The laminate shall consist of multiple layers of glass matting and resin. The surface exposed to the sewer/chemical environment shall be resin rich and shall have no exposed fibers.

B. Bells: Bell shall be manufactured from the same unsaturated, supplier certified, commercial grade polyester resins as the main FRP Baseliner body. If available, polypropylene injection molded bells are also allowed.

C. Gaskets: Resilient materials for connectors and filler rings shall be manufactured from natural rubber, polyisoprene, neoprene, nitrile, or ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) synthetic rubber and shall conform to the material requirements prescribed in this specification. If a splice is used in the manufacture of the seal, its strength shall be such that the seal shall with-stand a 180° bend with no visible separation.

D. Mechanical devices: Expansion rings, tension bands, and take -up devices used for mechanically compressing the resilient portion of the connector against the pipe or SSMH shall be made from a material or materials in combination that will ensure durability, strength, resistance to corrosion, and have properties that will ensure continued resistance to leakage. All metallic mechanical devices and bolt assemblies used to mechanically deform resilient materials shall be constructed of corrosion resistant materials meeting the physical properties and chemical composition requirements of ASTM A493 and A666, Type 302 through Type 316.

E. Third party accessories: Third party accessories integral to the PVC SSMH System or the FRP SSMH Liner (flow control devices, valves, gates, inside drop assembly, man entry ladder, etc.) shall be governed by the respective manufacturers’ materials specifications.

F. Concrete: Concrete shall be wet -cast, conforming to the requirements of the most recent versions of ASTM C478, CSA A23.1, and CSA A23.4. Concrete shall have an A-3 exposure class, unless otherwise specified by the project engineer.

3.2 DESIGN
A. Exterior Surface: The exterior surface shall be finished with embedded aggregates and FRP bonding bridges to allow for adequate bonding with the surrounding concrete once cast. The exterior surface shall be free of blisters larger than 0.5” in diameter, delamination and fiber show, except in the vicinity of FRP bonding bridges where fiber show is acceptable. Gel-coat or paint or other coatings are not allowed.

B. Interior Surface: The interior surfaces shall be resin rich with no exposed fibers.

Interior flow surfaces shall be smooth for improved corrosion resistance and reduced sludge build-up. The surface shall be free of crazing, delamination, blisters larger than

0.25” in diameter, and wrinkles of 0.125” or greater in depth. Gel-coat shall be permitted on interior surfaces, no paint or other coatings are allowed.

C. Repairs: Any SSMH liner repair is required to meet all requirements of this specification. All repair must all be preapproved by the manufacturer.

33 05 13-6
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

D. Chemical Resistance: FRP SSMH liners must demonstrate having sufficient corrosion resistance by passing the “Greenbook” 2009 edition (or later), Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Chemical Resistance Test (Pickle Jar Test), per third-party accredited laboratory test results.

E. Physical Properties:

All FRP liner material shall have the following physical properties when tested at 77 °F ± 5 degrees:

Property Standard Units Value
Density
ASTM D792 g/cm3 1.02
Thickness -- Mm 3 min.

Tensile Strength
ASTM D638 psi 6.500
min.

Hardness (Shore “A”)
ASTM D2240 95-97
Weight change -- -- --
Flexural Strength
ASTM D790 lbf/in2 8050 min
Compressive
Strength
ASTM D695 psi 6,500
min
Ignition Loss
ASTM D2584 % 52 avg.

Taber abrasion test
(weight loss)
ASTM D4060 % 0.075

Tensile specimens shall be prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM D412 using Die B. Weight change specimens shall be 1 IN by 3 IN samples.

All gaskets shall have the following physical properties:

Property Standard Units Requirement
Chemical resistance:
1N sulfuric acid
1N hydrochloric
acid
ASTM D543
(at 24°C for 48
hr.)

%
%

No weight loss
No weight loss
Tensile Strength ASTM D412 psi 1,200 min.

Elongation at Break ASTM D412 % 350 min.

Hardness (Shore A) ASTM D2240 -- ±5 from the connector
manufacturer’s specified
hardness
Accelerated oven
aging
ASTM D573
(at 70°C for 7
days)
% Max 15% decrease in tensile
strength; Max 20%
decrease in elongation
Compression set ASTM D 395,
Method B
(at 70°C for 22
hr.)
% Max 25% decrease of
original deflection
Water absorption ASTM D471
(at 70°C for
48hr.)
% Increase of max 10% of
original weight (19 by
25mm specimen)
Ozone Resistance ASTM D1149 -- Rating 0
Low temperature ASTM D2137 -- No fracture at -40°C

33 05 13-7
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

brittle point
Tear resistance ASTM D624, Die
B
kN/m 34

Upon request, the manufacturer shall provide written certification that the FRP liners and gaskets used meets or exceeds the requirement of this specification.

F. Chemical Resistance

1. After conditioning to constant weight at 110 °F, FRP liner specimens shall be exposed to the following solutions for a period of 112 days at 77 °F ± 5 degrees, as prescribed in Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, section 211-2 (Pickle Jar Test).

2. At 28-day intervals, tensile specimens and weight change specimens shall be removed from each of the chemical solutions and tested. If any specimen fails to meet the 112 -day requirement before completion of the 112 -day exposure, the material will be subject to rejection.

Chemical Solution Concentration
Sulfuric acid 20%*
Sodium hydroxide 5%
Ammonium hydroxide 5%*
Nitric acid 1%*
Ferric chloride 1%
Sodium hypochlorite 1%
Soap 0.1%
Detergent (linear alkyl
benzyl sulfonate or LAS)

0.1%
Bacteriological BOD not less than
700 ppm
* Volumetric percentages of concentrated C.P. grade reagents.

3.2 MANUFACTURER
A. Manufacturer shall have 25 years of FRP concrete protective liner manufacturing experience and shall have fabricated and delivered at least 20,000 FRP concrete protective liners for wastewater applications.

B. Precaster shall be certified by the National Precast Concrete Association.

PART 4 - EXECUTION

4.1 MATERIALS TEST METHODS

A. All test methods shall be performed per corresponding ASTM standard and per “Greenbook” 2009 edition (or later), Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Chemical Resistance Test (Pickle Jar Test).

33 05 13-8
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

4.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

A. Examination: Each SSMH liner shall be examined for dimensional requirements and workmanship.

B. Composition Control: Controls on glass and resin content shall be maintained for all manufacturing processes and for each portion of SSMH liner fabrication. Records shall be maintained for these control checks. Proper glass content may be shown by glass usage checks or glass and resin application rate checks.

C. Certified facility: The SSMH liners shall be designed and manufactured in an ISO 9001 and 14001 certified manufacturing facility.

4.3 PRECASTING

A. Casting: FRP SSMH liners are non-structural components. Liners must be monolithically cast within a concrete SSMH section using a wet cast method. Custom pouring supports shall be provided with FRP liners to fully support the liners during the concrete pouring process against the vertical and horizontal forces created by the concrete during casting.

The poured SSMH base must not be moved until adequate hydration has occurred.

Lifting devices must not penetrate any surface of the liner. No liner may have holes or openings which will permit the intrusion of liquids or gases through the liner wall and into the concrete.

B. Installation: The PVC SSMH installation should strictly follow the Predl Systems’ recommended installation procedures to ensure long-term corrosion resistant service.

4.4 FIELD INSTALLATION

A. Base: Base shall be place on a compacted, graded bedding meeting the requirements of the contract documents. Base shall be level, with the invert elevations conforming to the contract documents.

a. Connect pipes to the SSMH base, using integral bell connectors, with gaskets supplied by the manufacturer

B. Riser: Clean the joint surface of the base, ensuring no foreign material remains. Place ASTM C990 compliant butyl rubber sealant along the joint, ensuring no gaps remain.

a. Lower PVC riser onto joint, ensuring the butyl rubber sealant is engaged and compressed. Riser shall be set plumb.

b. Backfill approximately 6” -12” below the top of the riser. Compact backfill per contract documents and standard practices.

c. Clean the top of the PVC riser, ensuring no foreign material remains. Place ASTM C990 compliant butyl rubber sealant along top of the riser, ensuring no gaps remain.

C. Flat top: Lower flat top on to PVC riser, ensuring the butyl rubber sealant is engaged and compressed. Place Telescopic Access Collar gasket in gasket seat of SSMH opening.

33 05 13-9
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

Stack grade rings to the desired height. Place Telescopic Access Collar into grade ring opening, exert a downward force on the collar to engage the collar with the gasket, while ensuring no concentrated point loads are applied to the TAC. Ensure the gasket is fully engaged and no rolling occurred. Place butyl rubber sealant on top of collar flange, then set casting. Backfill and pave.

4.5 FINAL TESTING AND ACCEPTANCE

A. Hydrostatic Testing: Hydrostatic testing shall be conducted, as required, by plugging with approved plugs all influent and effluent pipes in the SSMH and filling the SSMH to the top of the SSMH cone with water. Additional water may be added over a 24-hour period to compensate for evaporate losses. At the conclusion of the 24-hour saturation period the SSMH shall be filled to the top of the SSMH cone and observed. A loss within a 30-minute period shall be considered an unsuccessful test.

B. Vacuum Testing: Sanitary Sewer Main tenance Access Structure s shall be tested, as required, after installation and prior to backfilling with all connections (existing and proposed) in place, in general accordance with ASTM C1244.

The lines entering the SSMH shall be temporarily plugged with the plugs braced to prevent them from being drawn into the SSMH . The plugs shall be installed in the lines beyond drop connections, gas sealing connections, etc. The test head shall be inflated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. A vacuum of 10 inches of mercury shall be drawn, and the vacuum pump will be turned off. With the valve closed, the level vacuum shall be read after the required test time. If the drop in the level is less than 1-inch of mercury (final vacuum greater than 9-inches of mercury), the SSMH will have passed the vacuum test. The required test time is determined from the table below:

33 05 13-10
Hybrid PVC Sewer Manhole
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

C. Acceptance: SSMHs will be accepted with relation to the hydrostatic test requirements and the vacuum test requirements if the meet the criteria above. Any SSMH which fails the initial test must be repaired or replaced prior to backfilling. The SSMH shall be retested as described above until successful tests have been made. After the successful tests, the temporary plugs will be removed.

4.6 WARRANTY
A. A 10-year Warranty against corrosion shall be issued.

+ + END OF SECTION + +

33 05 26-1
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 33 05 26

GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER PIPE BURSTING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 DESCRIPTION
A. This section covers the work necessary to completely replace gravity sanitary sewer pipe via pipe bursting techniques. The work shall consist of furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and supervision necessary to replace certain sanitary sewer lines identified on the Contract Drawings. The Work shall consist of upsizing the existing specified 8” and 10” sewer pipes with 10” and 12” high density polyethylene (HDPE) standard dimension ratio (SDR) 17 pipe respectively. Complete replacement of the specified sanitary sewer lines shall consist of, but not necessarily limited to:

1. Sewage flow bypassing during the pipe bursting operations.

2. Identification, disconnection, and reconnection of all existing live laterals if applicable.

3. Excavation, backfill, and surface restoration of access pits.

4. Television inspection and testing of completed pipe system.

1.2 REFERENCES
A. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)

1. ASTM C923, Standard Specification for Resilient Connectors Between Reinforced Concrete Manhole Structures, Pipes, and Laterals

2. ASTM D638, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics

3. ASTM D1238, Measuring Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer

4. ASTM D1248, Polyethylene Plastics Molding and Extrusion Materials

5. ASTM D1505, Density of Plastics by the Density-Gradient Technique

6. ASTM D1599 , Test for Short Term Rupture Strength of Plastic Pipe, Tubing and Fittings

7. ASTM D1693, Test for Environmental Stress-Cracking of Ethylene Plastics

8. ASTM D1928, Preparation of Compression Molded Polyethylene Test Samples

9. ASTM D2122, Determining Dimensions of Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings

10. ASTM D2321, Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Flexible Sewer Pipe

11. ASTM D2657, Standard Practice for Heat Fusion Joining of Polyolefin Pipe and Fittings

12. ASTM D2837, Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials

13. ASTM D3035, Polyethylene Plastic Pipe (SDR -PR) Based on Controlled Outside Diameter

14. ASTM D3261, Specification for Butt Heat Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Fittings for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe and Tubing

15. ASTM D3350, Polyethylene Plastic Pipe and Fittings Materials

16. ASTM F585, Insertion of Flexible Polyethylene Pipe in Existing Sewers

17. ASTM F714, Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastic Pipe Based on Outside Diameter

18. ASTM F1055, Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for OD Controlled PE Pipe and Fittings
B. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

33 05 26-2
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

1. Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1926

1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Quality assurance procedures shall be performed by the pipe manufacturer fully in accordance with the requirements of this specification. The certification shall include certified laboratory data confirming that said tests have been performed on a sample of the pipe to be provided under this contract, or pipe from that production run, and that satisfactory results were obtained.

B. Fusion joining and other procedures necessary for correct assembly of the polyethylene/PVC pipe shall be done only by personnel trained in those skills to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER and the pipe supplier.

C. Only those tools designed for the aforementioned procedures, and approved by the pipe manufacturer or supplier and the ENGINEER, shall be used for assembly of pipe fittings to ensure proper installation. The heater plate shall be equipped with suitable means to measure the temperature of plate surface and to assure uniform heating such as thermometers or pyrometers.

D. The CONTRACTOR performing the pipe installation shall be certified by the pipe bursting system manufacturer that the CONTRACTOR is a licensed installer of the manufacturer's system (if applicable).

1.4 QUALIFICATIONS
A. The CONTRACTOR will have actively engaged in the installation of pipe using pipe bursting for a minimum of five (5) years and have installed, as a company, a minimum of 50,000 feet in similar conditions. Field Supervisory Personnel employed by the Pipe Bursting CONTRACTOR will have at least five (5) years of documented experience in the performance of the work and tasks as stated in the contract documents.

B. Fusion equipment shall be operated only by technicians who have been certified by the pipe manufacturer or supplier and who have a minimum of three (3) years of experience fusion welding similarly sized pipe. The technicians experience shall be documented in the pipe submittal.

1.5 PERMITS
A. Permits and Regulations:

1. Perform excavation Work in compliance with applicable requirements of governing authorities having jurisdiction.

2. Obtain all necessary permits for Work in roads, rights -of-way, etc. Also obtain permits as required by local, state and federal agencies for discharging water from excavations, for erosion control, and for prevention of air and water pollution.

1.6 SUBMITTALS
A. CONTRACTOR shall submit a Pipe Bursting Work Plan and Construction Schedule as required by the CITY and ENGINEER in accordance with the requirements of 01 32 13, Progress Schedule.

33 05 26-3
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

B. CONTRACTOR shall submit a sewage bypass pumping and/or diversion plan for review and approval by the CITY and ENGINEER in accordance with the requirements of 01 57 03, Sewage Bypass Pumping.

C. CONTRACTOR shall submit an Excavation Support plan for review and approval by the CITY and ENGINEER in accordance with the requirements of section 3.2.B.7 and 31 05 03, Earthwork.

D. The CONTRACTOR shall perform trial fusion welds and submit samples to the ENGINEER for review prior to installation of the pipe. Full penetration welds shall provide a homogeneous material across the cross -section of the weld. The fusion machine employed for the trial welds shall be the same machine to be utilized for the installation work.

E. CONTRACTOR shall submit details of insertion pit dimensions as required for safe bending of the pipe and straight-line insertion of the bursting head, pipe burst tooling, and pipe into the host pipe. CONTRACTOR shall also submit details of insertion pit and reception pit shoring and dewatering.

F. Shop Drawings:

1. The CONTRACTOR shall submit catalog cuts, specifications, dimensioned drawings, and installation details/sketches and other pertinent information for the pipe installation work. All materials provided shall be fully in accordance with the requirements of the reference specifications specified above.

2. The CONTRACTOR shall verify with the pipe manufacturer all connection details.

3. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish, prior to use of the materials, a certified affidavit of compliance for all materials and conformance with the methods of the manufacturer and ASTM requirements

1.7 EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM
A. Active Sewers: CONTRACTOR shall manage active flows from all sewer lines and sewer laterals as indicated on the Drawings and the Specifications.

B. Connections to Existing Sewers and Manholes: The CONTRACTOR shall make all required connections to existing sewers, laterals, and manholes and carry out such work in accordance with local standards and requirements and as directed by the ENGINEER.

Extreme care to prevent debris from flowing into downstream sewer lines shall be exercised.

1.8 PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
A. The CONTRACTOR shall contact the appropriate regional notification center such as Underground Service Alert (USA) at 800-227-2600 at least two (2) working days before beginning construction. The CONTRACTOR shall request that the utility owners conduct a utility survey and mark clearly the location of their services.

B. It is CONTRACTOR’s responsibility to determine the exact location and depth of all existing utilities, including service connections, which have been marked by the utility owners, which are shown on contract drawings and which the CONTRACTOR believes may be impacted by the Work.

33 05 26-4
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

C. The CONTRACTOR is cautioned that unknown utilities may be encountered or that the exact location of known utilities may be different than marked on the surface. If unknown utilities are encountered, work in that area must not proceed without CITY and ENGINEER’s approval.

D. The CONTRACTOR shall take necessary precautions to prevent damage to existing structures and hardscapes whether on the surface, aboveground, or underground. The CITY and ENGINEER shall be satisfied with the hardscape conditions removed and replaced by the CONTRACTOR. The following are the property protection requirements for the CONTRACTOR to follow:

1. An attempt has been made to show major structures on the Drawings. While the information has been compiled from the best available sources, its completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed, and it is presented as a guide to avoid possible difficulties.

2. The CONTRACTOR shall protect all existing structures, trees, shrubs, and other items on the project site that are to be preserved, by substantial barricades or other devices commensurate with the hazard, from injury or destruction by vehicles, equipment, workmen, or other agents.

3. Where existing fences, gates, buildings, hardscaping, landscaping, trees, shrubs or any other structure must be removed to properly carry out the Work, or are damaged during the work, they shall be restored at the CONTRACTOR's expense to their original condition or better.

4. Without additional compensation, the CONTRACTOR may remove and replace in a condition as good as or better than original, any small structures such as fences, landscaping and others that interfere with the CONTRACTOR's operations.

1.9 SAFETY
A. The CONTRACTOR agrees that they shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions with respect to his specific work during the course of pipe bursting.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 MATERIALS
A. High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe

1. Pipe shall be high molecular weight, high density polyethylene pipe with a SDR of 17.

The material shall be listed by the Plastic Pipe Institute (PPI) with a designation of PE 4710 and have a minimum cell classification of 445574E (for Gray Pipe) as described in ASTM D3350. The pipe material shall meet the requirements for Type III, Class B, Category 5, Grade P34 material as described in ASTM D1248. The pipe shall contain no recycled compound except that generated in the manufacturer's own plant from resin of the same specification from the same raw material pipe. Pipe (excluding black colored pipe) stored outside shall not be recycled. Pipe and fittings shall be made in conformance with ASTM F714 and ASTM D3261 as modified for the specified material. The pipe shall be homogenous throughout and free of visible cracks, holes, foreign inclusions, or other injurious defects. It shall be uniform in density and other physical properties. Any pipe not measuring these criteria shall be rejected.

2. Pipe Color. Pipe shall conform to the following:
a. Inside. The inner wall shall be light green or gray

33 05 26-5
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

b. Outside. The outer wall shall be light green or gray c. Both the inside and outside may be the same color

3. Markings: Pipe materials shall be legibly marked by the pipe manufacturer. The following shall be printed on the pipe:
a. Name and trademark of manufacturer
b. Nominal pipe size
c. Dimension Ratio
d. The letters PE followed by the polyethylene grade per ASTM D1248, followed by the Hydrostatic Design Basis in hundreds of psi.
e. Manufacturing Standard Reference
f. A production code from which the date and place of manufacture can be determined

4. Joints:
a. Polyethylene pipe shall be joined by butt fusion welding, as specified in Part 3.4.

5. Coupling:
a. CONTRACTOR shall use electrofusion HDPE coupling with a designation of PE 4710 and have a minimum cell classification of 445574C as described in ASTM D3350, and a Hydrostatic Design Basis of 1600 psi @ 730F. b. PE4710 electrofusion couplings shall have a pressure rating of 200 psi for water @ 730F.
c. Electrofusion coupling shall be black in color.

6. Lateral Connections:
a. Laterals shall be connected to the main line by use of heat fused saddle as approved by the ENGINEER.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 GENERAL
A. This section is intended to provide the CONTRACTOR with general guidance on the methods to be used to install the sewer pipe using the pipe bursting method. Nothing contained herein shall relieve the CONTRACTOR from completing the pipe bursting operation in the most feasible, efficient, and safe manner, using required materials to the lines and grades shown on the plans and to the requirements of these specifications.

B. The CONTRACTOR shall protect pavements, improvements, utilities, and nearby structures from damage by forces, vibrations and ground movements generated by the pipe bursting equipment/process per section 1.8.

C. All work shall be performed as specified herein and supervised by personnel experienced in the installation of pipe by the pipe bursting method per section 1.4.

3.2 PREPARATION
A. Preliminary Site Investigation

1. Prior to the pipe bursting operation, the CONTRACTOR shall perform a careful site investigation to locate and record (via high quality full-color photographs) possible surface obstructions, locate and mark active and inactive sewer laterals (if applicable); and formulate and submit plans to replace the pipe, to reconstruct all sewer laterals, and to restore all structures and plants that would be damaged by the

33 05 26-6
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

Work. Photographs will be subject to the requirements of 01 33 03, Submittal Procedures in addition to the requirements below.
a. Preliminary site photographs shall document the entirety of the proposed alignment prior to the Work.
b. Photographs will be used to compare surface features after Work is completed to assess if damage has been done to existing features including but not limited to Asbestos cement paving and concrete.

2. Provide ENGINEER with sufficient notice and with means to examine the areas and conditions under which excavating, filling, and grading are to be performed.

3. An internal closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspection per specification 33 01 31 shall be performed by the CONTRACTOR after the sewer has been cleaned by the CONTRACTOR per specification 33 01 21, to determine the condition of each manhole-to-manhole segment of the existing sewer to be replaced by pipe bursting including evidence of cracks, past repairs, couplings, collars, pipe sags or changes in pipe direction that may represent obstructions to pipe bursting and requiring advance excavation and to locate sewer lateral service connections. The television inspection shall be completed in the same direction each i n conformance with CITY’s requirements. A copy of the television inspection video and logs from all televising operations shall be provided to the CITY and ENGINEER f or review prior to construction.

4. ENGINEER will notify CONTRACTOR if conditions are found that may be detrimental to the proper and timely completion of the Work.

5. Do not proceed with the Work until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected in a manner acceptable to ENGINEER.

B. Preliminary Site Work

1. General
a. The CONTRACTOR shall contact USA North811 (USA) service alert a minimum of forty-eight (48) hours in advance of any excavation or trenching work. USA may be contacted either on-line at usanorth811.org or by phone by dialing (800) 227- 2600 or 811.
b. The CONTRACTOR shall excavate and backfill, in advance of the construction, test pits to determine conditions and locations of the existing utilities and subsurface structures.
c. The CONTRACTOR shall define the location of each existing facility involved within the area of their Work under this Contract.

2. Existing Sewer Lateral Connections
a. Upon completion by the CONTRACTOR of the CCTV inspection, the CONTRACTOR shall mark in the field the location of the existing sewer lateral connection (s).

3. Handling and Storage
a. The CONTRACTOR shall exercise special care during the unloading, handling, and storage of all pipe to ensure that the pipe is not cut, gouged, scored, or otherwise damaged. Any pipe segment which has cuts in the pipe wall exceeding 10 percent of the wall thickness shall be cut out and removed from the site at the CONTRACTOR's expense.
b. The pipe shall be stored so that it is not deformed axially or circumferentially which may hinder pipe installation. CONTRACTOR shall test all pipe for ovality prior to installation. Pipe not meeting specified requirements shall be replaced with new material.

33 05 26-7
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

c. All polyethylene and PVC pipes shall have an ultraviolet inhibitor and shall also be stored in a covered area on blocks, such that no individual pipes weight shall bear on another pipe segment. Pipes shall be supported so as not to allow the pipe to sag along its length between blocks during storage.
d. Allowed work areas are delineated on the Drawings.

4. Temporary Fencing
a. CONTRACTOR shall f urnish and install temporary fenc ing surrounding excavations, entry and exit pits and work area, including the stockpile and storage areas.
b. CONTRACTOR shall p rovide fence openings only at vehicular, equipment and worker access points.

5. Environmental Controls
a. CONTRACTOR shall implement the construction procedures outlined herein to assure minimum damage to the environment during construction. Take all additional measures required to conform to the requirements of applicable codes and regulations.
1) Erosion:
a) CONTRACTOR shall implement the construction procedures outlined herein to assure minimum damage to the environment during construction.

1. Whenever possible, locate and construct access and temporary roads to avoid environmental damage. Make provisions to regulate drainage, avoid erosion and minimize damage to vegetation.

2. Where areas must be cleared for storage of materials or temporary structures, provisions will be made for regulating drainage and controlling erosion, subject to the ENGINEER'S approval.

3. Remove only those shrubs and grasses that must be removed for construction. Protect the remainder to preserve their erosion-control value.

4. Apply measures to control erosion and to minimize the siltation of the existing waterways, and natural ponding areas. Such measures include, but are not limited to, the use of berms, baled straw silt barriers, gravel or crushed stone, mulch, slope drains and other methods.

5. In the event CONTRACTOR repeatedly fails to satisfactorily control erosion and siltation, the CITY reserves the right to employ outside assistance or to use its own forces to provide the corrective measures indicated. The cost of such work, plus engineering costs, will be deducted from monies due CONTRACTOR.
2) Dust:
a) Prevent blowing and movement of dust from exposed soil surfaces and access roads to reduce on- and off-site damage and health hazards. b) Control may be achieved by irrigation in which the site is sprinkled with water until the surface is moist.
c) Repeat the process as needed.
3) Noise:
a) All noise -generating construction activity shall occur within the hours permitted by the Municipal Code, or as otherwise specified by the hours permitted by the ENGINEER. All construction activities shall comply with the CITY’s Noise Ordinance.

6. Sewer Bypass Pumping

33 05 26-8
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

a. The CONTRACTOR shall provide bypass pumping and/or flow diversion in accordance with Section 01 57 03.

7. Excavation Support Systems
a. Below Grade Structure Excavation Support
1) Provide, install, and maintain excavation support systems for all structural excavations where excavation support is required (at a minimum, as required by OSHA).
2) Follow all OSHA guidelines and other applicable laws and ordinances. 3) Prepare excavation support plan addressing the following topics:
a) Details of shoring, bracing, sloping or other provisions for worker protection from the hazards of caving ground
b) Design assumptions and calculations
c) Methods and sequencing of installing excavation support d) Proposed locations of stockpiled excavated materials e) Minimum lateral distance from the excavations for vehicles, equipment, and materials
f) Location of vertical and horizontal monitoring points on structures and recommended frequency of monitoring for excavation support system stability and performance
4) Design of excavation support systems and excavation support plan shall be prepared by a civil or structural engineer registered in the state in which the system is installed.
5) CONTRACTOR shall be made aware of Temporary excavation and groundwater management recommendations in the Geotechnical Report.

8. Vibration
a. The CONTRACTOR shall address the potential for vibration impacts to residences during construction activities by preparing a detailed monitoring and notification plan, subject to review and approval by the ENGINEER and the CITY. The plan shall include, at a minimum, the following items:
1) Public Notification. The CONTRACTOR shall notify property owners and residents located within 100 feet of pipe bursting activities at least one week prior to construction.
2) Vibration Monitoring. The CONTRACTOR shall perform vibration monitoring to establish the level produced by high impact activities during construction.

Monitoring should be conducted continuously whenever pipe bursting is done within 25 feet of any structure. Monitoring shall be conducted using a portable vibration monitoring instrument that provides a calibrated record of local ground movement/accelerations. If construction vibration exceeds 2.0 in./sec at the nearest exterior wall during vibration monitoring, construction activities shall immediately stop, and alternative work methods shall be used. The monitoring protocol and all monitoring results shall be submitted to the ENGINEER and CITY for review and approval.

3.3 PIPE BURSTING EQUIPMENT
A. Should it become necessary to temporarily stop bursting operations, provisions shall be made to remotely start and stop the bursting head.

B. Winch or Pulling Unit

33 05 26-9
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

1. The winch or pulling unit shall be operated to provide constant pull to the bursting unit in order that it may operate in an efficient manner with a minimum of recoil. It shall ensure directional stability in keeping the bursting unit in line.

2. The winch shall be of the constant load type and shall be fitted with a direct reading load gauge to measure the winching load. It shall also be fitted with a device to automatically disengage when loading exceeds a preset maximum load.

3. Contractor shall supply sufficient cable in one (1) continuous length so that the pull may be continuous between winching points.

4. The winch cable and cable drum shall be provided with safety cage and supports.

5. The CONTRACTOR shall also provide a system of guide pulleys and bracing at each manhole to minimize contact of cable with the existing sewer between manholes.

6. A nose cone shall be fixed to the first pipe or the head of the bursting unit and shall be fitted with a swivel attachment to reduce the twist transmission between the winch cable and nose cone.

7. Excavation supports in the insertion pit shall remain completely separate f rom the pipe support system and shall be so designed that neither the pipe nor the winch cable shall be in contact with them at any time.

C. Pneumatic Pipe Bursting

1. This section is intended to provide the CONTRACTOR with general guidance on the methods and equipment to be used to install the sewer pipe using the pneumatic pipe bursting method. Nothing contained herein shall relieve the CONTRACTOR from completing the pipe bursting operation in the most feasible, efficient, and safe manner, using required materials to the lines and grades shown on the plans and to the requirements of these specifications.

2. Pneumatic pipe bursting shall only be implemented for replacing fracturable pipe such as:
a. Asbestos Cement Pipe
b. Cast iron Pipe
c. Clay lined Concrete Pipe
d. Non-reinforced Concrete Pipe
e. Galvanized Steel Pipe
f. Polymer Concrete Pipe
g. PVC Pipe
h. Vitrified Clay Pipe

3. Only HDPE pipe shall be used for the pneumatic pipe bursting method.

4. The Pneumatic bursting unit shall consist of the following components at minimum:
a. Displacement hammer with an expander head fitted to the front or rear designed to force its way through the existing pipe bursting it as it progresses. The hammer may include components to allow reversible methods. b. Constant tension winch designed to keep the hammer in contact with the existing pipe keeping the hammer in alignment with the existing pipe. c. Air compressor to supply the adequate force necessary to power the pneumatic hammer and fracture and displace the existing pipe and surrounding soil.

D. Static Pipe Bursting

1. This section is intended to provide the CONTRACTOR with general guidance on the methods and equipment to be used to install the sewer pipe using the static pipe bursting method. Nothing contained herein shall relieve the CONTRACTOR from completing the pipe bursting operation in the most feasible, efficient, and safe manner, using required materials to the lines and grades shown on the plans and to the requirements of these specifications.

2. Static pipe bursting shall only be implemented for replacing fracturable pipe unless a series of cutters, splitters, or other assemblies are attached to the bursting head.

33 05 26-10
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

3. The Static Pipe Bursting unit shall consist of the following components at minimum:
a. An Expander head designed to force its way through the existing pipe, bursting it as it progresses. The expander head may include cutting or splitting assemblies to allow the bursting of non-fracturable pipe.
b. A rod, cable, or chain to be inserted into the existing pipe to align and guide the expander head and the new pipe. The rod, cable, or chain are attached to a static pipe bursting machine placed in an excavated pit at one end of the existing pipe. c. A hydraulic power pack to provide the necessary power to apply a large pull force on the expander head and fracture and displace the existing pipe and surrounding soil.

3.4 PIPE JOINING
A. Continuous Pipe:

1. For purposes of pipe storage on the job site above ground, s ections of HDPE/fPVC pipe shall be joined into continuous lengths of no more tha n 50' unless otherwise authorized by the ENGINEER. The joining method shall be the butt fusion method and shall be performed in strict accordance with the pipe manufacturer's recommendations. Fusion equipment used in the joining procedure shall be capable of meeting all conditions recommended by the pipe manufacturer, including, but not limited to, fusion temperature, alignment, and fusion pressure. CONTRACTOR shall keep a quality control log for every joint and pipe segment, certifying that all meet manufacturer requirements.

2. A fire-retardant bag or suitable enclosure shall be used with the heater plate to protect the heater plate surfaces from dirt and other debris when not in use. The heater plate surfaces shall be cleaned regularly as needed to prevent accumulation of fusion welding residues or other substances that may result in faulty pipe joining.

3. Butt fusion shall conform to ASTM D2657 and pipe manufacturer's criteria for the type of joining. Joint strength shall be equal to that of the adjacent pipe.

4. The inside and outside of the pipe ends shall be cleaned with a cotton or non - synthetic cloth to remove dirt, water, grease, and other foreign materials. The pipe ends shall be cut square and carefully aligned just prior to heating.

5. After achieving the proper melt pattern, the pipe ends shall be brought together in a firm, rapid motion applying sufficient pressure to form a pipe bead (1/8 inch to 3/16 inch in height) around and inside the entire circumference of the pipe.

6. The inside weld bead shall be removed by cutting the bead away without scoring the inside wall of the pipe. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the ENGINEER, for review as part of the submittal requirements, a de-beading process for use in removing the internal bead for the newly joined HDPE/fPVC pipe sections.

7. A single electrofusion coupling may be used to complete the new pipe connection to each existing manhole.

3.5 PIPE INSTALLATION
A. The Contractor shall install the pipe by utilizing a constant tension system with a hydraulic, pneumatic, or static bursting device that breaks apart the existing pipe. The void created by the bursting device shall be sufficient in size to accommodate the new pipe which shall be installed immediately after the void has been formed.

B. The CONTRACTOR shall bear full responsibility for completing the pipe installation regardless of selected method. CONTRACTOR shall have no right to claim additional costs

33 05 26-11
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

for the failure of the selected method to result in successful pipe installation. Failure of the CONTRACTOR’s submitted installation method shall not be an acceptable delay or idle time claim.

C. CONTRACTOR shall be aware that the geotechnical report lists recommendations for mitigation measures for ground deformation and provides methods for estimating whether impingement into existing, adjacent utility trenches might occur, based upon the diameter and depth of the existing utility.

D. CONTRACTOR shall submit for approval by ENGINEER detailed calculations showing how the selected method of construction will develop the forces required to successfully complete the pipe installation including the pipe bursting head expander configuration and outside diameter, the annular space created between the expander head and the new pipe outside diameter.

E. The CONTRACTOR shall excavate by hand or hand-operated mechanical equipment and expose potential obstructions to pipe bursting (e.g., past repairs, couplings, pipe collars or changes in pipe direction that may stop the bursting head) and remove obstructions prior to bursting. There will be no additional compensation for removal of pipe bursting obstructions, either known by the CONTRACTOR in advance of bursting or encountered during bursting.

F. The CONTRACTOR shall excavate by hand or hand-operated mechanical equipment and expose pipelines within two diameters of the pipe to be burst to reduce stresses on the those pipelines during construction.

G. The CONTRACTOR shall excavate by hand or hand-operated mechanical equipment and expose all building sewer lateral connections prior to replacing the existing sewer. The existing connections may be encased in mortar, concrete, or reinforced concrete. There will be no additional compensation for demolition of this concrete.

H. The CONTRACTOR shall excavate pits at each end of the sewer segment to be burst. Pits shall be of sufficient size to allow access for bursting equipment and installation of new pipeline. All excavation shall be fully braced and supported in accordance with Section

3.2.b.7. Pits shall be centered over the existing sewer. Prior to conducting the work, the CONTRACTOR shall submit a plan to the ENGINEER showing the size and location of the proposed pits. All excavations shall be covered and securely fenced during non-working hours.

I. The CONTRACTOR shall record the general progress i.e., insertion rates in feet per minute, reasons for stoppages, signs of failure of equipment and road or other surface damage. Contact by radio shall be always maintained between key positions so that slowing down, stopping and starting can be affected when necessary.

J. The CONTRACTOR shall anchor the pipe to manholes after the pipe has been installed along the length of the sewer replaced. The CONTRACTOR shall use a modular seal, as specified and shown on the Drawings that is firmly seated perpendicular to the pipe axis, around the pipe exterior and cast into the structure base or near the structure wall center and conforms to ASTM C923. The structure or manhole connection shall be made a minimum of 48 hours after pipe insertion, but no sooner than the pipe has stopped

33 05 26-12
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

moving in response to temperature changes. All cutting and sealing of the new pipe at manhole connections shall provide watertight pipe and manhole trough seals.

K. Continuous Pipe Installation Specific Requirements

1. The CONTRACTOR shall fuse together the full length of HDPE/fPVC pipeline to be installed prior to the start of pipe bursting. The above grade pipe shall be protected from scratching and gouging using pipe rollers or other suitable means.

3.6 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
A. General: Field acceptance of the new pipeline shall be based on the CITY’s testing methods as required under “SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA” of Construction Standards.

1. CONTRACTOR shall perform all Work in the presence of the CITY’s representative.

B. Manhole Inspection:

1. Manholes will be inspected after completion and within the guarantee period. Leakage and other defects that were a result of the CONTRACTOR’s work shall be eliminated and repaired by the CONTRACTOR as required by the ENGINEER, at the CONTRACTOR’s expense.

3.7 EXCAVATION BACKFILL
A. Refer to Section 31 05 03, Earthwork and standard details as shown on the drawings.

3.8 FINAL CLEANING AND CCTV INSPECTION
A. Prior to final acceptance and final inspection of the pipe by the ENGINEER, the CONTRACTOR shall flush and clean all parts of the system by removing all accumulated construction debris, rocks, gravel, sand, silt, and other foreign material from the pipe.

B. After completion of the pipe installation, finish work at the manholes and final cleaning, the CONTRACTOR shall televise the sewer in accordance with CITY’s requirements or section 33 01 31, Sewer Pipeline CCTV Inspection . The original video, stills, and electronic logs shall be provided to the ENGINEER and CITY.

C. Upon completion of all work, CONTRACTOR shall remove all surplus materials and rubbish, shall repair all damages caused by his workers and shall leave the premises in a clean and orderly condition.

3.9 DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIALS
A. Material removed from the excavations that does not conform to the requirements for fill or is in excess of that required for backfill shall be hauled away from the Work site and disposed of by the CONTRACTOR in compliance with ordinances, codes, laws and regulations at no additional cost to the CITY.

B. A site is not available to dispose of excess material.

33 05 26-13
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

3.10 RESTORATION OF EXISTING SURFACES
A. Refer to Section 32 12 16 or CITY Standard Details
++ END OF SECTION ++

33 05 26-14
Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe Bursting
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

40 05 03.19-1
Piping System Data Sheet – Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP)
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 40 05 03.19
PIPING SYSTEM DATA SHEET – DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP)

ITEM DESCRIPTION
Pipe Buried Piping: Pressure class as indicated in the pipe schedule. If not indicated:
• All pipe 12” diameter and smaller shall be pressure class 350. • All pipe 14” through 20” shall be pressure class 250. • All pipe larger than 20” shall be pressure class 200.

Flanged Piping: Special Thickness Class 53
Pressure class shall be per AWWA C150/A21.50 and
AWWA C151/A21.51

Lining Wastewater: Ceramic epoxy as follows:

1. Amine cured novalac epoxy containing at least 20% by volume of ceramic quartz pigment.

2. Permeability rating of 0.00 when tested per Method A of ASTM E 96, Procedure A with a test duration of 30 days.

3. Minimum lining thickness: 40 mils nominal dry film thickness.

4. The following tests must be run on coupons from factory lined Ductile Iron pipe:
a. ASTM B 117 Salt Spray (scribed panel). Results to equal

0.0 undercutting after two years.
b. ASTM G 95 Cathodic Disbondment (1.5 volts at 77ºF).

Results to equal no more than 0.5 mm undercutting after 30 days.
c. Immersion Testing rated using ASTM D 714.
i. 20% Sulfuric Acid: No effect after two years.
ii. 140ºF 25% Sodium Hydroxide: No effect after two
years.
iii. 160ºF Distilled Water (scribed panel): No effect after two years.
iv. 120ºF Tap Water (scribed panel): 0.0 undercutting after two years with no effect.
v. Abrasion Resistance: Less than .075 mm (3 mils) loss after one million cycles on a ±22.5º sliding aggregate
slurry abrasion tester using a sharp natural siliceous
gravel with a particle size between 2mm and 10 mm
(European Standard SN598).

5. Manufacturer and Product:
a. Protecto 401 Ceramic Epoxy Lining; Or Equal.

40 05 03.19-2
Piping System Data Sheet – Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP)
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

ITEM DESCRIPTION
Coating Unless otherwise specified in the Pipe Schedule, piping shall be coated as follows:

Buried Piping:
• AWWA C151/A21.51: Minimum 1-mil asphaltic coating.
• AWWA C105/A21.5: Polyethylene encasement, 4-mil high- density cross laminated or 8-mil linear-low density, color as required by local/state regulations.

Exposed/Immersed Piping:
• Primer Coating: Where shop primer is applied to protect pipe during shipping, storage and handling, primer shall be
compatible with pipe coating requirements of Section 09 91 03, Painting.

Fittings Lined and coated same as pipe.

Push-On (PO): AWWA C110/A21.10 and C111/A21.11, gray or ductile iron, 250 psi minimum working pressure. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., Fastite Joint; U.S. Pipe and Foundry, Tyton Joint.

Mechanical Joint (MJ): AWWA C110/A21.10, C111/A21.11, and C153/A21.53 gray or ductile iron, 250 psi minimum working pressure.

Follower glands shall be ductile iron.

Flange (FLG): AWWA C110/A21.10 ductile iron, faced and drilled, 125-pound flat face. Gray cast iron will not be allowed.

Joints Push-On (PO): 250 psi minimum working pressure,
AWWA C110/A21.10 and C111/A21.11. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., Fastite Joint; U.S. Pipe and Foundry, Tyton Joint.

Mechanical Joint (MJ): 250 psi minimum working pressure.

Flange (FLG): 125-pound flat face, ductile iron, threaded conforming to AWWA C115/A21.15. Gray cast iron will not be allowed.

Branch connections 3 inches and smaller, shall be made with service saddles as specified in Section 40 05 06, Piping Specialties.

Bolting T-Bolts and other specialty bolts: Type 304 stainless steel Hex Bolts: ASTM A193 B8, Type 304 stainless steel
Nuts: ASTM A194 Grade 8, Type 304 stainless steel

40 05 03.19-3
Piping System Data Sheet – Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP)
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

ITEM DESCRIPTION
Gaskets Push-On, Mechanical, and Proprietary Restrained Joints: Red Rubber (SBR) conforming to ANSI/AWWA C111/A21.11.

Flanged, Water and Sewage Service: 1/8 inch-thick, red rubber (SBR), hardness 80 (Shore A), rated to 200 degrees F, conforming to ANSI B16.21, AWWA C207, and ASTM D1330, Grades 1 and 2.

Full face for 125-pound flat-faced flanges, flat-ring type for 250-pound raised-face flanges. Blind flanges shall be gasketed covering the entire inside face with the gasket cemented to the blind flange.

Gasket pressure rating to equal or exceed the system hydrostatic test pressure.

Joint
Lubricant
Manufacturer's standard.

++ END OF SECTION ++

40 05 03.19-4
Piping System Data Sheet – Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP)
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

40 05 06-1
Piping Specialties
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 40 05 06

PIPING SPECIALTIES
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 SUBMITTALS
A. Shop Drawings:

1. Manufacturer’s data on materials, construction, end connection s, ratings, overall lengths, etc.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 MODULAR MECHANICAL SEALS
A. Features:

1. Type: Interconnecting synthetic rubber links shaped and sized to continuously fill annular space between pipe and sleeve, blockout, or core-drilled opening in concrete slabs or walls.

2. Links: EPDM

3. Bolts and nuts: Type 316 stainless steel

4. Pressure plates: composite

5. Temperature range: -40 to 250 degrees Fahrenheit

6. Pressure rating: guaranteed by the manufacturer to provide a water-tight seal with a differential hydrostatic head of 40-feet of water
B. Manufacturers and Products:

1. PSI-Thunderline; Link-seal, Type S-316

2. Or equal

2.2 PIPE TO MANHOLE CONNECTORS
A. Features:

1. Type: Resilient rubber male -to-female wedge-style flexible connector between a circular gravity pipe and a circular opening core-drilled into a precast or cast-in-place concrete structure.

2. Performance Requirements:
a. Able to hold 10 psi head pressure for 10 minutes with no leakage b. Load Rating: 150 lbs per inch pipe diameter

3. Materials:
a. Body: resilient rubber material conforming to ASTM C923 b. Hardware: 300 Series Stainless Steel conforming to ASTM C923, ASTM A666 and ASTM A240
B. Manufacturers and Products:

1. Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc., Model Kor-N-Seal I – 106 Series for pipes up to 18” diameter and Kor-N-Seal II – 206 Series for pipes from 20” to 54” in diameter.

2. Or Equal

40 05 06-2
Piping Specialties
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 INSTALLATION
A. General

1. Follow all manufacturer’s directions

++ END OF SECTION ++

40 05 10-1
Pipe and Fittings
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 40 05 10

PIPE AND FITTINGS
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 SUBMITTALS
A. Shop Drawings:

1. Product data sheets for each piping system.
a. Include information on pipe, fittings and joint systems.

2. Complete catalog information, descriptive literature, specifications, and identification of materials of construction.

3. Complete descriptions and data for all coatings and linings.

4. Tests and inspection data for pipe and coatings/linings.

5. Qualifications for welders and /or technicians performing joining processes that requires specialized equipment to perform the work or as specifically identified herein.

B. Operation and Maintenance Data as specified in Submittal Procedures section of these specifications.

1.2 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING
A. In accordance with manufacturer’s directions.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 PIPING SYSTEM DATA SHEETS
A. Piping system data sheets (PSDS) have been attached to this Specification and are incorporated herein by reference. Provide piping systems in accordance with piping system data sheets.

2.2 THRUST RESTRAINT
A. Provide rigid or restrained joints and fittings for all piping systems specified with a test pressure in the Pipe Schedule.

B. Unless otherwise specified in the Pipe Schedule or shown on the Drawings, thrust blocks shall not be used.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 PIPE SCHEDULE
A. A Pipe Schedule is included in the Specifications and is incorporated herein by reference.

Install piping systems in accordance with Pipe Schedule.

40 05 10-2
Pipe and Fittings
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

B. For pipe which is shown on the Drawings, but not referenced in the Pipe Schedule, CONTRACTOR to provide pipe material and fittings which are appropriate for the intended service and acceptable to the ENGINEER.

3.2 PREPARATION
A. Inspect pipe and fittings before installation, clean ends thoroughly, and remove foreign matter and dirt from inside.

B. Repair any coatings or linings which were damaged during shipping and handling using manufacturer-approved coating and lining repair materials in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

3.3 INSTALLATION
A. General:

1. Join pipe and fittings in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions, unless otherwise shown or specified.

B. Joint Assembly:

1. Thermally butt fused (BF) HDPE joints
a. In general, the individual performing thermal butt fusion and electrofusion and the equipment used shall meet the requirements of the Plastic Pipe Institute (PPI), Technical Note (TN) 42, Recommended Minimum Training Guidelines for PE Pipe Butt Fusion Joining Operators and the requirements of Title 49, CFR Subpart F, 192.282 and 192.285.
b. Specific requirements that apply when joining HDPE pipe using butt fusion shall be as follows:
1) Submit documentation that the fusion technician has been qualified and trained by the fusion equipment manufacturer or pipe manufacturer in the operation and procedures of the butt fusion process. All qualifications and training shall have been received within 1 -year from the date of submitting the information. If acceptable documentation cannot be provided, sample joints shall be made and test ed in accordance with TN-42. If pipe wall thickness is greater than 1–inch, submit an acceptable method recommended by the pipe manufacturer that will be used to test the sample joint. All costs associated with the sample joint testing and any retesting shall be borne by the CONTRACTOR.
2) Each 2” NPS and larger butt fusion joint shall be documented using a data logging device or written log that records the following minimum parameters per completed joint:
a) Date and time
b) OWNER’s project number and/or name
c) Fusion Machine model
d) Pipe size, rating and PE type code (i.e. PE4710)
e) Heater plate surface temperature (minimum 2 values for each side of the heater plate per joint)
f) Recorded drag pressure
g) Gauge pressure and associated interfacial pressure (psi) h) Heating time

40 05 10-3
Pipe and Fittings
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

i) Transfer time between heater plate being removed from the face of the opposing pipe ends and when the pipe ends are butted together j) Cooling time
3) Provide log records at the end of each day in hardcopy format or as agreed upon with the OWNER and/or ENGINEER. Submit one (1) copy as a minimum to the OWNER’s Representative or ENGINEER.
4) At the completion of the work, submit all data log records on a compact disc that can be accessed using the data log manufacturer’s software or if using written logs, all individual written daily logs are transferred into a pdf format and identified by day as a separate file.
c. All joints that are determined to be defective visually or as a result of pressure testing shall be repaired using a thermal fusion method unless otherwise approved by the OWNER’s Representative or ENGINEER.
d. Install buried HDPE pipe in accordance with ASTM D2774 and the pipe manufacturer’s specific recommendations.

C. Buried Pipe Installation:

1. Pipe Placement:
a. Keep trench dry until pipe laying and joining are completed. b. Exercise care when lowering pipe into trench to prevent twisting or damage to pipe.
c. Prevent foreign material from entering pipe during placement. 1) Close and block open end of last laid pipe section when placement operations are not in progress and at close of day’s work.
d. Lay pipe upgrade with bell ends pointing in direction of laying. e. Deflect pipe at joints for pipelines laid on a curve using unsymmetrical closure of spigot into bell. Utilize a maximum of 75 percent of manufacturer’s recommended allowable joint deflection.
1) If joint deflection of standard pipe lengths will not accommodate horizontal or vertical curves in alignment, provide:
a) Shorter pipe lengths.
b) Fittings/bends.
f. Secure pipe which has been placed from movement or damage while placing the next section of pipe.
g. Prevent uplift and floating of pipe prior to backfilling.

D. Cleaning:

1. Following assembly and testing, and prior to disinfection and final acceptance, flush pipelines with water at 2.5 fps minimum flushing velocity until foreign matter is removed. At a minimum, flush for a period of time which will flush the entire pipeline volume three times.
a. If impractical to flush large diameter pipe at 2.5 fps, clean in-place from inside by brushing and sweeping, then flush line at lower velocity. If lower velocity is used, flush the entire pipeline volume five times.

2. Provide temporary means of removing flushing water from pipeline during flushing.

3. Provide means for removal/screening of debris from the flushing water, disposal of debris and disposal of flushing water.

40 05 10-4
Pipe and Fittings
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

3.4 TESTING
A. Pressure test piping in accordance with the Pip e Schedule, Testing of Pressure Piping Systems section of these specifications.

3.5 SUPPLEMENTS
A. The following supplements are attached to this Specification section and incorporated herein by reference:

1. 40 05 33.12 – Piping System Data Sheet - HDPE Pressure Pipe (HDPE)

2. 40 05 41 – Piping System Data Sheet - Vitrified Clay Gravity Sewer Pipe (VCP)

++ END OF SECTION ++

40 05 10.01-1
Pipe Schedule
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 40 05 10.01

PIPE SCHEDULE

1.1 DESCRIPTION
A. General:

1. This schedule is provided for the convenience of the CONTRACTOR. Some flow streams may be shown on the drawings, but not listed here.

B. Flow Stream IDs:

1. SS - Sanitary Sewer
C. Pipe Materials:

1. Ductile Iron Process Pipe (DIP)

2. Fusible HDPE Pressure Pipe

3. Vitrified Clay Gravity Sewer Pipe (VCP)
D. Joint Types:

1. MJ – Mechanical Joint

2. PO – Push On

3. WLD – Butt Welded
E. Lining Systems:

1. CE – Ceramic Epoxy
F. Coating Systems:

1. System numbers as described in Section 09 91 03, Painting.

1.2 PIPE SCHEDULE
Contractor shall install piping systems in accordance with the following pipe schedule:

SERVICE DESCRIPTION EXPOSURE SIZE RANGE MATERIAL JOINT
TYPE
TEST

PRESSURE

LINING COATING SYSTEM/
COLOR
SS Sanitary
Sewer
Buried
(Pipe Burst)
10”, 12”, 14”, 18” HDPE WLD 5 psi N/A SEE PSDS
SS Sanitary
Sewer
Buried
(Open Cut)
12”, 15” VCP PO 5 psi N/A SEE PSDS
SS Sanitary
Sewer
Buried
(Open Cut)
10” DIP MJ 5 psi Ceramic
Epoxy

SEE PSDS

++ END OF SECTION ++

40 05 33.12-1
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 40 05 33.12

FUSIBLE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 DESCRIPTION
A. SCOPE

1. This section specifies high density polyethylene (HDPE) pressure pipe and fittings for water and wastewater applications , including standards for dimensionality, testing, quality, acceptable fusion practice, safe handling and storage.

2. Furnish all labor, materials, equipment and incidentals required and install and test HDPE pipe and fittings , complete as shown on the Drawings and as specified herein.

3. Each offsite pipeline system shall utilize a single continuous length of the same pipe material, size, and pressure class unless otherwise noted on the Contract Drawings.

4. Pipe shall conform to the following dimensionality and general characteristics table:

PIPE DESCRIPTION

NOMINAL

DIAMETER
(IN.)
DR
(IPS) COLOR

PRESSURE
CLASS
(PSI)
REQD
INNER

DIAMETER
(IN.)
18” SS 18 17
Grey/Black
with green
stripe
125 15.75
14” SS 14 17
Grey/Black
with green
stripe
125 12.25
12” SS 12 17
Grey/Black
with green
stripe
125 11.16
10” SS 10 17
Grey/Black
with green
stripe
125 9.41
*Reference hydraulic grade line drawings for maximum working head depictions. Maximum working head is defined as the maximum hydraulic grade line to be used in CONTRACTOR calculations for test pressures as specified in Section 40 05 10.01.

1.2 REFERENCES
A. Work performed under this section shall conform to the Contract Drawings and Specifications and shall comply with all standards, rules and regulations, laws and

40 05 33.12-2
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

ordinances of the OWNER and all other authorities having jurisdiction, as amended.

That which is necessary to make the work comply with the above requirements shall be provided without additional cost to the OWNER.

B. Unless otherwise specified, references to documents shall mean the documents in effect at the time of design, bid, or construction, whichever is earliest. If referenced documents have been discontinued by the issuing organization, references to those documents shall mean the replacement documents issued or otherwise identified by that organization or, if there are no replacement documents, the last version of the document before it was discontinued.

C. Where document dates are given in the following listing, references to those documents shall mean the specific document version associated with that date, regardless of whether the document has been superseded by a version with a later date, discontinued or replaced.

D. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, most recent version:

1. ASTM D 2321 Standard Practice for Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pipe for Sewers and Other Gravity-Flow Applications

2. ASTM D 2683 Standard Specification for Socket -Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside Diameter Controlled Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing

3. ASTM D 2737 Standard Specification for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Tubing

4. ASTM D 2774 Standard Practice for Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pressure Piping

5. ASTM F 2880 Standard Specification for Lap -Joint Type Flange Adapters for Polyethylene Pressure

6. Pipe in Nominal Pipe Sizes 3⁄4 in. to 65 in.

7. ASTM D 3035 Standard Specification for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe (DR -PR) Based on Controlled Outside Diameter

8. ASTM D 3261 Standard Specification for Butt Heat Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Fittings for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe and Tubing

9. ASTM D 3350 Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Pipe and Fittings Materials

10. ASTM F 585 Standard Guide for Insertion of Flexible Polyethylene Pipe Into Existing Sewers

11. ASTM F 714 Standard Specification for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe (SDR -PR) Based on Outside Diameter

12. ASTM F 905 Standard Practice for Qualification of Polyethylene Saddle -Fused Joints

13. ASTM F 1055 Standard Specification for Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside Diameter Controlled Polyethylene Pipe

14. ASTM F 1290 Standard Practice for Electrofusion Joining Polyolefin Pipe and Fittings

15. ASTM F1417 Standard Test Method for Installation Acceptance of Plastic Gravity Sewer Lines Using Low-Pressure Air

40 05 33.12-3
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

16. ASTM F 1962 Standard Guide for Use of Maxi -Horizontal Directional Drilling for Placement of Polyethylene Pipe or Conduit under Obstacles, Including River Crossings

17. ASTM F 2164 Standard Practice for Field Leak Testing of Polyethylene (PE) Pressure Piping Systems Using Hydrostatic Pressure

18. ASTM F 2206 Standard Specification for Fabricated Fittings of Butt -Fused Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe, Fittings, Sheet Stock, Plate Stock, or Block Stock

19. ASTM F 2620 Standard Practice for Heat Fusion Joining of Polyethylene Pipe and Fittings

20. ASTM F 3124 Standard Practice for Data Recording the Procedure Used to Produce Heat Butt Fusion Joints

21. ASTM F 3183 Standard Practice for Guided Side Bend Evaluation of Polyethylene Pipe Butt Fusion Joint

22. ASTM F 3190 Standard Practice for Heat Fusion Equipment (HFE) Operator Qualification on Polyethylene (PE) and Polyamide (PA) Pipe and Fitting E. American Water Works Association (AWWA), most recent version:

1. AWWA C600 - Installation of Ductile Iron Water Mains and Their Appurtenances

2. AWWA C901 - Polyethylene (PE) Pressure Pipe and Fittings, 1/2 -in Through 3 -in, for Water Distribution and Transmission

3. AWWA C906 - Polyethylene (PE) Pressure Pipe and Fittings, 4 -in Through 63 -in, for Water Distribution and Transmission

4. ANSI/AWWA C651 Standard For Disinfecting Water Mains

5. AWWA M55 – PE Pipe – Design and Installation
F. American National Standards Institute (ANSI), most recent version:

1. ANSI B16.1 - Cast Iron Flanges and Flanged Fittings.

2. ANSI B16.21 - Nonmetallic Flat Gaskets for Pipe Flanges.

3. ANSI/NSF 61- Drinking Water System Components-Health Effects G. Plastic Pipe Institute, PPI

1. PPI Handbook of Polyethylene Pipe – 2009 (2ndEdition)

2. PPI Municipal Advisory Board (MAB) Generic Electrofusion Procedure for Field Joining of 12 Inch and Smaller Polyethylene (PE) Pipe

3. PPI Material Handling Guide for HDPE Pipe and Fittings

4. PPI TR-34 Disinfection of Newly Constructed Polyethylene Water Mains

5. PPI TR-38 Bolt Torque for Polyethylene Flanged Joints

6. PPI TN -42 Recommended Minimum Training Guidelines for PE Pipe Butt Fusion Joining Operators for Municipal and Industrial Projects

1.3 SUBMITTALS
A. The name of the pipe and fitting manufacturers and a list of materials to be furnished by each manufacturer. Also, include information on the supplier and distributor.

B. The name and qualifications of each technician proposed to perform fusion of pipe joints (including sidewall saddle fusion and electro fusion).

40 05 33.12-4
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

C. Shop Dr awings including piping layouts and schedules shall include dimensioning, fittings, types and locations of valves and appurtenances, joint details, methods and location of supports, anchorage, gasket material, grade of material and all other pertinent technical information for all items to be furnished.

D. Pipe manufacturer and Fusion services provider shall include the following:

1. Minimum Bending Radius

2. Maximum Safe Pull Force
E. Submit certification that the stress regression testing has been performed on the specific polyethylene resin being utilized in the manufacturing of the pipe for this contract in accordance with ASTM D2837.

F. Prior to each shipment, submit certified test reports that the pipe and fittings for this contract were manufactured and tested in accordance with the ASTM and AWWA Standards specified herein.

G. After pipe installation, the following AS -RECORDED DATA is required from the contractor and/or fusion provider to the OWNER upon request:

1. Surveyed point and vertical elevation of each butt fused joint, electrofusion coupling, and saddle.

2. Approved datalogger device reports

3. Pipe Size and Thickness

4. Machine Size

5. Fusion Technician Identification

6. Job Identification

7. Fusion Joint Number

8. Fusion, Heating, and Drag Pressure Settings

9. Heat Plate Temperature

10. Time Stamp

11. Heating and Cool Down Time of Fusion

12. Ambient Temperature

1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. A representative of the pipe supplier shall witness and inspect the fusion of the first 20 joints installed by each fusion technician.

B. All HDPE pipe to be installed under this Contract may be inspected at the factory for compliance with this Section by an independent testing laboratory provided by the OWNER. The manufacturer's cooperation shall be required in these inspections. The cost of these plant inspections of all pipe approved for this Contract will be borne by the OWNER.

C. Inspection of the pipe may also be made by the ENGINEER or other representatives of the OWNER after delivery. The pipe shall be subject to rejection at any time on account of failure to meet any of the specified requirements, even though pipes may have been accepted as satisfactory at the place of manufacture. Pipe rejected after

40 05 33.12-5
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

delivery shall be marked for identification and shall immediately be removed from the jobsite.

1.5 WARRANTY
A. The pipe and pipe installation via fusion services shall be warranted for a minimum of one year per the pipe supplier’s standard terms.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 GENERAL
A. High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe Materials

1. All material shall be manufactured from a PE 4710 resin listed with the Plastic Pipe Institute (PPI) as TR-4. The resin material shall meet the specifications of ASTM D 3350 with a minimum cell classification of 445474C. HDPE pipe and fittings shall contain no recycled compounds except that generated in the manufacturer's own plant from resin of the same specification from the same raw material.

2. Pipe carrying fluids with disinfection residuals such as potable water, recycled water, or purified water, shall include Chlorine Class III Oxidative Resistance as defined by PPI TN-44, ASTM F2263, and ASTM D3350.

3. Pipe shall be made of HDPE material with a minimum material designation code of PE4710 and with a minimum Cell Classification as noted above. The polyethylene compound shall be suitably protected against degradation by ultraviolet light by means of carbon black of not less than 2 percent. The manufacture of the HDPE resin shall certify the cell classification indicated.

4. Pipe sizes 3” and large shall have a manufacturing standard of ASTM F 714, while pipe smaller than 3” shall be manufactured to the dimensional requirements listed in ASTM D 3035. Dimension Ratio (DR) and Outside Diameter (IPS/DIPS) shall be as specified on plans.

5. Pipe shall meet AWWA C901 (1/2” to 3”) or AWWA C906 (4” to 63”), and shall be listed as meeting NSF-61.

6. Pipe shall be manufactured by an ISO 9001 certified manufacturer. The pipe manufacturer shall have an ongoing Quality Control program for incoming and outgoing materials and shall assure that the pipe will meet the material requirements of this specification. HDPE resins for manufacturing of pipe shall be checked for density, melt flow rate, and contamination. The facility shall have the necessary testing equipment to verify that pipe meets the AWWA and NSF standards. Pipe shall be checked for outside diameter, wall thickness, length, and surface finish on the inside and outside. The Manufacturer’s production facilities shall be open for inspection by the OWNER or ENGINEER.

7. HDPE pipe is a flexible conduit and shall be designed to transfer imposed loads to the surrounding embedment medium. The pipe and fittings shall be homogeneous throughout and free of all defects including but not limited to, holes, foreign inclusions, voids, indentations, delaminations, cracks, bubbles and pinholes, which due to their nature, degree, or extent, detrimentally affect the strength and serviceability of the pipe. Any pipe or fittings with such defects which, in the

40 05 33.12-6
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

judgement of the ENGINEER, will affect the strength and serviceability shall be repaired or rejected.

8. Pipe shall be furnished in standard laying lengths not exceeding 50-ft.

B. HDPE FITTINGS

1. All polyethylene pipe fittings shall be HDPE PE4710 and meet the requirements of ASTM F714. Fittings shall be made of HDPE material with a minimum material designation code of PE4710 and with a minimum Cell Classification 445474C.

Fittings shall have a minimum pressure rating equal to or greater than the pipe to which they are joined unless otherwise specified on the plans or accepted by ENGINEER. All fittings shall meet the requirements of AWWA C901 or C906

2. HDPE fittings carrying fluids with disinfection residuals such as potable water, recycled water, or purified water, shall include Chlorine Class III Oxidative Resistance as defined by PPI TN-44, ASTM F2263, and ASTM D3350.

3. HDPE fittings shall be joined using fully self -restrained butt fusion and electrofusion. Adhesives , solvents, cements, socket fittings, push-on-joints, grooved joints, and mechanical compression joints shall not be permitted. All joints shall be made in strict compliance with the manufacturer's recommendations and ASTM 2657.

4. Butt Fusion Fittings
a. Molded fittings shall comply with the requirements of ASTM D 3261.

5. Electrofusion HDPE Fittings
a. Electrofusion Fittings shall have a manufacturing standard of ASTM F1055. For potable water systems, all electrofusion fittings shall have AWWA approval.

6. Elbow fittings shall be long radius and may not exceed 90 degrees.

C. MECHANICAL FITTINGS

1. The use of self-restrained and unrestrained mechanical couplings are not permitted.

D. SADDLE SIDEWALL FUSION CONNECTION

1. Mechanical saddle connections to HDPE carrier pipe are not permitted

2. Electrofusion saddles are not permitted.

3. Saddle connections to host HDPE pipe shall be made via saddle sidewall fusion.

E. PIPE IDENTIFICATION

1. At 5-ft intervals along the pipe, the pipe shall be marked with the name of the manufacturer, size and class (pressure and DR), and manufa cturing reference to ASTM F714.

2. All pipe shall be color coded for the intended service. The color coding shall be permanently coextruded stripes on the pipe outside surface as part of the pipe’s manufacturing process. Painting HDPE pipe to accomplish color coding is not permitted. Color coding shall be as follows:
a. Communications or Power - orange
b. Sewer – green
c. Potable Water - blue

40 05 33.12-7
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

d. Non Potable Water, Recycled Water, or Purified Water – purple.

F. CONNECTION HARDWARE

1. Bolts, nuts, and washers for buried service shall be made of non -corrosive, high- strength, low-alloy steel having the characteristics specified in ANSI/AWWA C111/A21.11, regardless of any other protective coating.

G. All ductile iron mechanical and flanged fittings shall be lined and coated with Tnemec 431 or Protecto 401 and as per manufacturer recommendation.

2.2 CONNECTIONS TO SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND STRUCTURES A. HDPE pipe shall be connected to manholes and other structures to provide a leakfree, properly graded flow into or out of the manhole or structur e shall be as indicated in the Contract Documents.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 GENERAL
A. All HDPE pipe and fittings shall be cut, joined, and installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Joining, laying, and pulling of polyethylene pipe shall be accomplished by personnel experienced in working with polyethylene pipe systems.

3.2 TRANSPORTATION, UNLOADING, HANDLING, AND STORAGE A. The manufacturer shall package product in a manner designed to deliver the pipe and fittings to the project neatly, intact and without physical damage. During transportation each pipe shall rest on suitable pads, strips skids, or blocks securely wedged or tied in place.

B. During loading, transportation, and unloading, every precaution shall be taken to prevent damage to the pipe. The handling of the pipeline shall be in such a manner that the pipe is not damaged by dragging it over sharp and cutting objects. Cuts or gouges that reduce the wall thickness by more than 10% are not acceptable and must be cut out and discarded.

C. Handle the pipe in accordance with the PPI Handbook of Polyethylene Pipe (2nd Edition), Chapter 2. All pipe and accessories shall be loaded and unloaded by lifting with hoists or by skidding in order to avoid shock or damage. Under no circumstances shall materials be dropped. Pipe handled on skidways shall not be rolled or skidded against pipe on the ground. Slings, hooks or pipe tongs shall be padded and used in such a manner as to prevent damage to the exterior surface or interior of the pipe. All

40 05 33.12-8
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

pipe and fittings shall be subjected to visual inspection at time of delivery and before they are lowered into the trench to be laid.

D. Materials, if stored, shall be kept safe from damage and shall not be stacked higher than the limits recommended by the manufacturer. The bottom tiers shall be kept off the ground on timbers, rails, or concrete. Pipe shall not be stored close to heat sources.

E. The interior of the pipe as well as all sealing surfaces of mating components (i.e. flange faces) shall be kept free from dirt or foreign matter at all times. The open ends of all sections of joined and/or installed pipe (not in service) shall be plugged to prevent insects, animals, or foreign material from entering the pipe line or pipe section. The practice of stuffing cloth or paper in the open ends of the pipe will not be permitted. Use waterproof nightcaps to prevent the entrance of any type of natural precipitation into the carrier or containment pipe and will be secured to the pipe in such a manner that the wind cannot blow them loose. Where possible, the pipe shall be raised and supported at a suitable distance from the open end such that the open end will be below the level of the pipe at the point of support.

F. All pipe and fittings shall be subjected to visual inspection at time of delivery and before they are installed or lowered into the trench to be laid. Defective, damaged, or unsound pipe will be rejected. Cuts, punctures, or gouges that penetrate or reduce the wall thickness by 10% or more are not acceptable and must be removed and discarded.

3.3 INSTALLATION
A. Cutting pipe shall be done per the manufacturer’s recommendations. No machine oil shall be imparted upon the cut surface. The cut shall leave a smooth cut at right angles to the axis of the pipe.

B. HDPE pipe shall be pulled into place. Prior to pulling the pipeline, Contractor shall place rollers or other approved devices beneath the pipe to avoid unnecessary damage and to reduce pipe drag. Dragging the pipe on concrete or asphaltic pavement is not permitted.

C. Per ASTM F1804, the Contractor shall determine and document the maximum proposed pull-in length and pull -in force for the pressure class and pipe diameter to be pulled. Pull -in lengths may not exceed the maximum lengths for the class and diameter pipe.

D. Contractor shall install HDPE for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) trenchless construction pursuant to ASTM F1962, PPI TR -46, and PPI PE Handbook at a minimum.

E. Contractor shall slipline HDPE inside a host pipe pursuant to ASTM F585 and PPI PE Handbook. A minimum 24 -hour pipe relaxation period is required for sliplining operations prior to final connection to and installation of fittings.

40 05 33.12-9
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

F. Fusible HDPE PE4710 pipelines maximum radius of curvature shall not exceed 100 x pipe outer diameter as installed. A maximum of 75% of manufacturer -permitted minimum long -term cold bending radii shall only be permitted by the ENGINEER in special circumstances where fittings or flanges are not present or as designed by ENGINEER.

3.4 FUSION AND JOINING
A. GENERAL

1. All HDPE pipe segments shall be joined via butt fusion or electrofusion couplings.

Smaller diameter connections to the HDPE pipe shall be made via sidewall fusion saddles or a butt fused reducing tee. The Contractor shall make every effort to reduce the use of electrofusion couplings as much as feasible and limit it to connecting separate testing runs, different classes of pipes, or repaired sections.

Alternatives shall not be permitted for intermediate joints connecting two HDPE pipe segments unless permitted by ENGINEER on an individual basis.

B. BUTT FUSION REQUIREMENTS

1. The pipe shall be joined by the butt fusion procedure outlined in ASTM F 2620 or PPI TR-33. All fusion joints shall be made in compliance with the pipe or fitting manufacturer’s recommendations. Fusion joints shall be made by qualified fusion technicians per PPI TN -42. A record or certificate of training for the fusion operator must be provided that documents training to the fundamentals of ASTM F 2620.

2. Each fusion joint shall be recorded and logged by an electronic monitoring device (data logger) connected to the fusion machine.

3. Only appropriately sized and outfitted fusion machines that have been approved by the pipe supplier shall be used for the fusion process. Fusion machines must incorporate the following elements:
a. HEAT PLATE - Heat plates shall be in good condition with no deep gouges or scratches. Plates shall be clean and free of any debris or contamination.

Heater controls shall function properly; cord and plug shall be in good condition. The appropriately sized heat plate shall be capable of maintaining a uniform and consistent heat profile and temperature for the size of pipe being fused, per the pipe supplier’s guidelines.
b. CARRIAGE – Carriage shall travel smoothly with no binding at less than 50 psi.

Jaws shall be in good condition with proper inserts for the pipe size being fused. Insert pins shall be installed with no interference to carriage travel. c. GENERAL MACHINE - Overview of machine body shall yield no obvious defects, missing parts, or potential safety issues during fusion. d. DATA LOGGING DEVICE – An approved datalogging device with the current version of the pipe supplier’s recommended and compatible software shall be used. Datalogging device operations and maintenance manual shall be with the unit at all times. If fusing for extended periods of time, an independent 110V power source shall be available to extend battery life.

4. Other equipment specifically required for the fusion process shall include the following:
a. Pipe rollers shall be used for support of pipe to either side of the machine.

40 05 33.12-10
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

b. A weather protection canopy that allows full machine motion of the heat plate, fusion assembly and carriage shall be provided for fusion in inclement, extreme temperatures, and /or windy weather, per the pipe supplier’s recommendations.
c. An infrared (IR) pyrometer for checking pipe and heat plate temperatures shall be used.
d. Fusion machine operations and maintenance manual shall be kept with the fusion machine at all times.
e. Facing blades specifically designed for cutting HDPE pipe shall be used.

C. ELECTROFUSION REQUIREMENTS

1. Electrofusion joining shall be done in accordance with the manufacturers recommended procedure. Other sources of electrofusion joining information are ASTM F 1290, PPI TN 34, and PPI Municipal Advisory Board (MAB) Generic Electrofusion Procedure for Field Joining of 12 Inch and Smaller Polyethylene (PE) Pipe. The process of electrofusion requires an electric source, commonly called an electrofusion processor that has wire leads and a method to read electronically (by laser) or otherwise input the barcode of the fitting. The electrofusion processor must be capable of reading and storing the input parameters and the fusion results for later download to a record file. Qualification of the fusion technician shall be demonstrated by evidence of electrofusion training within the past year on the equipment to be utilized for this project.

D. SADDLE SIDEWALL FUSION CONNECTION

1. Saddle sidewall fusion shall be done in accordance with ASTM F 2620 or TR -41 or the fitting manufacturer’s recommendations and PPI TR-41.

2. Saddle sidewall fusion joints shall be made by qualified fusion technicians.

Qualification of the fusion technician shall be demonstrated by evidence of fusion training within the past year on the equipment to be utilized on this project.

3. Saddle sidewall fusion is used to fuse branch saddles, tapping tees, and other HDPE constructs onto the wall of the main pipe (ASTM F905).

E. FUSION OPERATORS

1. The employer of the fusion machine operator is responsible for the fusion joint quality of the fusion weld made by that individual. The employer is responsible for documenting all training and qualification records for that individual, including compliance to any code requirements for fusion/bonder operators.

2. All HDPE fusion equipment operators shall be qualified to the procedure used to perform pipe joining. Fusion equipment operators shall have current, formal training on all fusion equipment employed on the project. Training received more than two years prior to operation with no evidence of activity within the past 6 months shall not be considered current.

3. Fusion operators must have a current fusion training certificate McElroy Fusion Training Certificate for the equipment to be used on the project

4. When the fusion machine operator is employed by the HDPE pipe and fusion machine supplier, the supplier shall maintain an ISO 9001 Certified Quality Management System

40 05 33.12-11
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

F. FUSION DATA RECORDING

1. McElroy DataLogger or equivalent fusion data recorder shall be used to record all fusion welds on hydraulically operated fusion machines. The device shall be capable of meeting the requirements of ASTM F 3124, “Standard Practice for Data Recording the Procedure used to Produce Heat Butt Fusion Joints in Plastic Piping Systems or Fittings”. The device, or combination of devices, shall record the following variables of each fused joint:
a. Heater surface temperature - immediately before inserting the heater plate, measure with a pyrometer and manually enter into the weld record. b. Gauge pressure during the initial heat cycle
c. Gauge pressure and elapsed time during the heat-soak cycle d. Heater removal (dwell) time v. Gauge pressure and elapsed time during the fusing/cool cycle
e. Drag pressure vii. Pipe diameter and wall thickness
f. Type of HDPE material (Specification and Classification) and manufacturer g. Fusion Machine Identification

2. The device shall record the operator name and a unique operator ID number, along with the date and time of each weld.

3. Records showing the device is up to date on all required calibration should be available for presentation when requested.

4. All fusion welds should be traceable to the report (via operator and weld ID) with an indentation weld stamp or by permanent paint marker/pen next to fusion weld.

G. INSTALLATION AND FUSION WEATHER CONDITIONS

1. The CONTRACTOR shall note that HDPE expands/contracts 1” for every 100 -ft of pipe for every 10°F change. CONTRACTOR shall consider and make provisions for thermal expansion of HDPE during placement so as undue stresses do not develop at connection points to fittings from compression (cold pipe heating up) or tension (hot pipe cooling down ). In addition, the CONTRACTOR shall make every effort to reduce snaking of the pipeline from thermal expansion prior to placement of fill material to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER . The CONTRACTOR shall base final lengths and make final connections to fittings when the outer temperature of the HDPE pipe is within 10°F of the monthly annual average temperature or within 10°F of the temperature of groundwater or if the CONTRACTOR has mitigated thermal expansion effects to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER.

2. Considerations shall be given to and provisions made to mitigate adverse weather conditions, such as temperatures below freezing, precipitation, heavy fog and mist, or wind.

3.5 TESTING
A. Butt Fusion Examinations and Testing

1. Visual: For pipe sections, examine the full exterior circumference for bead uniformity before cutting. After cutting the pipe section, review the interior bead.

All beads should have visually acceptable bead formation as shown in Fig 4 and Appendix X2 of ASTM F 2620. In addition, the following characteristics are expected:
a. There shall be no evidence of cracks or incomplete fusing

40 05 33.12-12
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

b. There shall be no evidence of captured objects (e.g., pipe shavings, facer ribbons) between bonded surfaces.
c. Variations in upset bead heights on opposite sides of the cleavage and around the circumference of fused pipe joints are acceptable
d. The apex of the cleavage between the upset beads of the fused joint shall remain above the base material surface
e. Fused joints shall not display visible angular misalignment, and outside diameter mismatch shall be less than 10% of the nominal wall thickness f. Fusion data record review that meet criteria of section 3.04.D.1 can be used as additional verification of visual indicators.

2. Fusion Data Record Review
a. The fusion date record for each fused joint shall be compared to the approved fusion procedure. The reviewer shall verify the following:
1) That all data required herein was recorded
2) Interfacial pressure was within the acceptable range 3) Heater surface temperature was within the acceptable range 4) Butt fusion pressure applied during the fusing/cool cycle was correctly calculated to include drag pressure, fell within the acceptable range for the applicable size and agrees with the recorded hydraulic fusing pressure. 5) Butt fusing pressure was reduced to a value less than or equal to drag pressure at the beginning of the heat soak cycle.
6) Fusing machine was opened at the end of the heat soak cycle, the heater was removed, and the end were brought together at the fusion pressure with the acceptable time range
7) Cooling time at butt fusing pressure met the minimum time specified b. If the recorded data is outside the limits of the acceptable range, the joint is unacceptable, and must be removed and replaced.
c. Frequency. Records for test fusion joints should be reviewed immediately after the joint is completed. Fusion joints for jobsite fusions should be reviewed daily or before being covered with backfill.

3. Mechanical Test
a. Contractor shall mechanically test the first fusion of each operator and each machine used on the project. Installation shall not continue until a fusion test has passed the test. Additional mechanical test are not required as long as long as the fusion are reviewed with the frequency specified herein. b. Testing of fusion joints with no fusion data record review shall be at a frequency specified by the Owner or Engineer.
c. The fusion shall be allowed to cool completely, then fusion test straps shall be cut out.
d. All samples shall be labeled with operator information. Testing must be done at 73 degrees F plus or minus 5 degrees. The test temperature and sample size are critical to testing. Testing performed at cold or elevated temperatures may not give similar results to tests performed at ambient temperatures. e. Each pipe sample weld shall be subjected to testing at two locations 180 degrees apart from each other in the joint weld. All specimens shall be tested by one of the following methods:
1) Reverse Bend Test are allowed for pipe sizes 4” IPS or smaller. The

40 05 33.12-13
Fusible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

specimens shall be prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM F 2620, Appendix X4.
2) Guided Side Bend Test are allowed for all wall thicknesses of 1” or greater.

The specimens shall be removed and tested in accordance with ASTM F 3183. 3. Hydrostatic Burst Test is allowed for pipe sizes 2”-24”. The specimen length should measure 6 times pipe diameter with the butt fusion joint in the center of the specimen. The specimen should be tested in a tank filled with water, and testing conditions monitored and recorded with computerized equipment. The specimen will be tested at 4 times pipe rated pressure for 5 minutes with no failure of joint allowed. f. Results of any mechanical test should be documented. Information on the weld and operator should be transferred from the sample to the testing record.

3.6 PIGGING, FLUSHING, CLEANING, AND DISINFECTING
A. All mains shall be pigged, cleaned and flushed to remove all dirt, sand, debris , cuttings, and other foreign matter. The Contractor shall be responsible for developing a pigging and flushing plan to be submitted to the Engineer for approval prior to pigging and flushing.

B. Disinfection:

1. Cleaning and disinfecting of potable water systems shall be in accordance with AWWA C651 and AWWA M55 Chapter 10, and PPI Handbook of Polyethylene Pipe Chapter 2 (2nd Edition).

2. The liquid disinfection chemical solution should be limited to less than 12% active chlorine. The time -duration of the disinfection should not exceed 24 hours.

Chlorine tablets or powders are not permitted.

3. Upon completion, the system should be thoroughly flushed with fresh water, and retested to verify the disinfectant chlorine level has been re duced to potable drinking water concentrations in all service water tubing and branch lateral pipes

+ + END OF SECTION + +

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK

40 05 41-1
Piping System Data Sheet – Vitrified Clay Gravity Sewer Pipe (VCP) Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 40 05 41
PIPING SYSTEM DATA SHEET – VITRIFIED CLAY GRAVITY SEWER PIPE (VCP)

ITEM DESCRIPTION
Pipe Conform to the requirements of ASTM C700 (4 to 42-inch) with unglazed extra strength vitrified clay pipe (VCP). The crushing strength (3-edge bearing method) shall be as set forth in the National Clay Pipe Institute (NCPI) Specification ER 4-67 for VCP.

Fittings Conform to the requirements of ASTM C700 (4 to 42-inch) with watertight preformed joints used with VCP.

Joints Two part polyurethane mixture joint with bell and spigot conforming to ASTM C425. Joints shall have resilient properties.

Gaskets Conform to the requirements of ASTM C700.

Joint Lubricant Vegetable based soap lubricant and as per Manufacturer’s standard.

++ END OF SECTION ++

40 05 41-2
Piping System Data Sheet – Vitrified Clay Gravity Sewer Pipe (VCP) Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

40 05 58-1
Fabricated Slide Gate
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

SECTION 40 05 58

FABRICATED SLIDE GATES
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 DESCRIPTION
A. Scope: This Section describes the design, fabrication, and supply of fabricated stainless steel slide gates, including wall thimbles (if applicable), pipe adapters (if applicable) , discs, guide frames, stem guides, seats, operating stem, operator, and anchorage. Gate supplier shall provide all materials, equipment, and accessories necessary to furnish and install slide gates as described herein and as shown on Drawings.

1.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Reference Standards: Comply with requirements and recommendations of the following references, except as otherwise specified:

1. AWWA C561-12, Fabricated Stainless Steel Slide Gates

2. NSF/ANSI 61, Drinking Water System Components Health Effects

3. ASTM A 276, Specification for Stainless Steel Bars and Shapes

4. American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA)

5. Anti-Friction Bearing Manufacturers Association (ABMA) B. Manufacturer’s Qualifications: Gate manufacturer shall have a minimum of five years of experience of producing substantially similar equipment and shall be able to show evidence of at least ten installations in satisfactory operation for at least five years.

C. Unit Responsibility: All equipment specified herein shall be coordinated and provided by a single gate manufacturer. Manufacturer assumes full responsibility for coordination of all components.

D. Source Quality Control:

1. Shop Tests:
a. Test each slide gate fully assembled for proper seating, operation, and for leakage.
b. Fully open and close gate disc in its guide system to ensure that it operates freely.

E. Warranty: Provide a 1-year warranty on all equipment from date of start-up. Warranty shall cover defects in workmanship, design, and materials. If any component should fail during the warranty period, it shall be corrected and the unit restored to service at no expense to the OWNER.

1.3 SUBMITTALS
A. Shop Drawings:

40 05 58-2
Fabricated Slide Gate
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

1. Detailed drawings showing component and assembly dimensions, location of mechanical connections, weights of all equipment, installation details, and accessory details.

2. Drawings, templates and directions for installation of anchor bolts and stem couplings.

B. Product Data:

1. Descriptive literature, specifications, and engineering data.

2. Materials of construction for all components and accessories.

3. Force calculations for gate operator and stem, including seismic loading calculations.

4. Shipping, storage, protection and handling instructions.

5. Installation directions.

6. Operation and Maintenance Manual.

C. Shop Test Results:

1. Submit results of the required shop tests.

D. Field Test Results:

1. Submit a written report giving the results of the field tests required.

1.4 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING
A. Gate manufacturer shall provide any special unloading, storage and handling instructions.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 PRODUCT AND MANUFACTURER:

A. Golden Harvest, GH-46NRS
B. Or equal

2.2 GOVERNING STANDARD
A. Except as modified or supplemented herein, fabricated slide gates and their appurtenances shall conform to the applicable requirements of AWWA C561.

2.3 SERVICE CONDITIONS AND PERFORMANCE
A. Gate Schedule:

Tag G-01
Location Wier Manhole
Service Raw Wastewater
Operation Open-Close
Size (W x H) Coordinate with Hybrid PVC Manhole
Manufacturer for 12” VCP inlet pipe

40 05 58-3
Fabricated Slide Gate
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

Tag G-01
Self-Contained No
Seating Head ~14 feet
Unseating Head 12 inches
Inv. Elevation 194
Embedded Inv.

Operating Floor Elevation
Mounting Wall
Closure J-Bulb Seal
Top Seal No
Actuator Nut
Gate Opening Direction Upward
Stem Movement Non-Rising
Stem Cover Type None
Limit Switches No
B. Performance:

1. Closed leakage shall not exceed 0.05 gallons per minute (GPM) per foot of gate periphery under seating or unseating head conditions.

2.4 COMPONENTS
A. General:

1. Slide gates and all appurtenances shall be provided by one gate manufacturer.

2. All components of the gates shall have a minimum thickness of ¼-inch.

3. Gates shall be either self-contained or non self-contained of the rising stem or non- rising configuration as indicated on the gate schedule.

B. Frame:

1. Frame Material: ASTM A-276 Type 316L SS.

2. Designed for maximum rigidity as column to take the thrust developed during the slide gate operation under maximum head.

3. Bolt-together guide frames are allowed.

4. Guide frame corners shall be factory welded.

5. The guides shall extend above or beneath the opening a sufficient amount to support the disc in the fully open or closed position.

6. The frame configuration shall be of the flush -bottom type and shall allow the replacement of the top and side seals without removing the gate frame from the wall.

7. Provide bolt holes in upper portion of sides of frame for connection to supporting angle.

C. Disc:

1. Material: ASTM A-240 Type 316L SS.

2. Disc shall be reinforced as necessary to limit deflection under the design operating head to less than 1/360 of the gate span.

3. Reinforcing members shall be 316L SS angle or channels welded to the plate.

D. Guides and Seals:

40 05 58-4
Fabricated Slide Gate
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

1. The guides shall be provided with frame mounted ASTM D-4020 ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) seals that contact both sides of the slide disc and shall be of such length as to retain and support two thirds of the vertical height of the slide in the fully open position.

2. Side and top seals shall be neoprene ASTM D-2000 or ASTM D-4020 UHMWPE, and shall be mechanical and fully adjustable in the field , or shall be self-adjusting type with a continuous compression cord.

3. Lower seals shall be flush bottom resilient neoprene, mounted to the bottom of the disc or to the frame.

E. Yoke and Pedestal (For Self-Contained Gates):

1. Self-contained gates shall be provided with a yoke to support the operating bench stand. The yoke shall be formed by two structural members welded at the top of the guides to provide a one piece rigid frame. The maximum deflection of the yoke shall be 1/360 of the gate's span.

F. Pedestal (For Non Self-Contained Gates):

1. Non-self contained gates shall be provided with pedestal mounted lifts. Pedestal shall be stainless steel and provided with shop coating.

G. Stem:

1. Material: ASTM A-276 Type 316L SS.

2. Diameter shall be 1-1/2 inch minimum, and be sized as necessary to withstand two times the compressive force when 40 pounds of force are applied at the operator.

3. Stem shall be supported such that the L/r ratio for unsupported lengths does not exceed 200.

4. Threaded portions of the stem shall be full-depth ACME type cold rolled threads with a maximum surface roughness of 0.000016 inches. Machine cut threads will not be accepted.

5. Join stems of more than one section by stainless steel or silicon bronze couplings threaded and keyed to the stems. All threaded and keyed couplings of the same size shall be interchangeable.

6. Provide rising stems with an adjustable stop collar on the stem on all gates with manual operators.

7. Connect the stem to the disc by means of a bolted connection with a minimum of two bolts.

H. Stem Guides:

1. Provide Type 316 stainless steel stem guides when necessary to ensure that the maximum L/R ratio for the unsupported part of the stem is 200 or less per AWWA C561 standards. Maximum stem spacing allowed is 10 feet.

2. Guides shall consist of collar with UHMWPE bushings, and bracket with slotted holes for adjustment in two directions.

3. Inside diameter of the collar and bushings shall be slightly larger than the gate stem to prevent binding.

I. Manual Actuator:

1. Crank Type:
a. Each crank-operated manual actuator shall be provided with a removable crank having a revolving grip.

40 05 58-5
Fabricated Slide Gate
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

b. Crank handles shall have an overall length of not less than 6 inches and not more than 15 inches.
c. Crank handles shall be made of corrosion resistant material. d. Maximum effort required to open the gate shall not be more than 40 pounds, and shall be able to withstand, without damage, an effort of 80 pounds. e. Crank shall have fully enclosed single or double gear reducer as required for lifting capacity.
1) Gears shall be machine cut.
2) Arrow marked “open” shall be cast on the housing to indicate direction of rotation to open the gate.
3) All bearings and gears shall be totally enclosed in a cast steel weather tight housing.
4) Provide anti-friction bearings to properly support both opening and closing thrusts. Ball or roller bearings shall be used to support the stainless steel pinion shaft on crank-operated gearboxes.
5) Lubrication fitting shall be provided in gear housing to permit lubrication of all gears and bearings.

2. Handwheel Type:
a. Direct Drive without reduction gearing
1) Maximum handwheel diameter shall be 30 inches.

3. Furnish threaded bronze lift nut to engage threaded portion of stem. a. Lift nut shall be flanged and supported on roller bearings. b. Lift nut shall be capable of thrust developed during opening and closing of the gate without damage.
c. Provide adjustable bronze stop collar for OPEN and CLOSED position limitation. d. Distance from center of radius of crank arm or center of handwheel to ground shall be less than 48 inches.

J. Fasteners and Anchor Bolts:

1. All fasteners necessary for installation and operation shall be furnished by the gate manufacturer.

2. Fasteners shall be Type 316 stainless steel

3. Fasteners shall be ½-inch diameter minimum, and adequately sized to withstand all operational stresses.

4. Provide Type 316 stainless steel anchor bolts as required for stem guides, floorstands, and all equipment or appurtenances which must be secured to concrete walls or floors. Anchor bolts shall be of ample size and strength for the purpose intended, and shall be furnished by the gate manufacturer. Anchor bolts shall have a minimum diameter of 1/2 -inch. Anchor bolts shall conform to the requirements of Specification Section 05 05 06, Anchors, Inserts, and Epoxy Dowels.

K. Spare Parts: Provide the following spare parts:

1. Bronze lift nuts:
a. One for each stem diameter provided

2. Special tools required for servicing operator
L. Identification:

40 05 58-6
Fabricated Slide Gate
Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collections System Improvements Project City of Roseville April 2024
WWE Project: 23-056 BID SET

1. Identify each slide gate with gate m anufacturer’s nameplate stamped with the approved designation as shown in the Gate Schedule. Manufacturer’s nameplate shall be permanently fastened to the gate at the factory.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 INSTALLATION
A. Installation shall be as shown on the Drawings and in accordance with gate manufacturer’s written instructions.

3.2 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
A. Conduct functional and performance tests under approved simulated operating conditions.

B. Functional Tests:

1. Each slide gate with appurtenances shall be field tested. Tests shall demonstrate to ENGINEER that each part and all parts together function in the manner intended. All necessary testing equipment and manpower shall be provided by CONTRACTOR at his expense. OWNER will furnish all power, and incidental material and labor required for the tests.

C. Leakage Tests:

1. Maximum permissible leakage shall be in accordance with the requirements of Sub- Section 2.2, above. Excess leakage shall be reduced to meet specified requirements by adjusting the gate, or replacement will be required.

D. In the event that the gate manufacturer is unable to demonstrate to ENGINEER that his equipment meets the requirements of the tests, the deficient equipment will be rejected, and adjustments and/or modifications shall be made. Retest the equipment as often as necessary to meet the specified requirements. No separate payments shall be made for adjustments and/or modifications.

3.3 MANUFACTURER’S FIELD SERVICES:

1. Minimum 2 trips for Manufacturer’s Field Services:
a. 1 person-day for installation assistance
b. 1 person-day for inspection, testing, alignment, and training

++ END OF SECTION ++

CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
Micro-Surfacings

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS
37 BITUMINOUS SEALS
37-3 SLURRY SEALS AND MICRO-SURFACINGS
Replace section 37-3.03 with:
37-3.03 MICRO-SURFACINGS
37-3.03A General
37-3.03A(1) Summary
Section 37-3.03 includes specifications for applying micro-surfacings.

Applying a micro-surfacing shall consist of mixing a polymer modified, cationic micro-surfacing emulsion (MSE), aggregate, mineral filler, set-control additives, and water and spreading the mixture on a pavement surface where shown on the plans, in conformance with the provisions in these Special Provisions and State Revised Standard Specifications, and as directed by the Engineer. 37-3.03B Material
37-3.03B(1) Micro-surfacing Emulsion (MSE)
Micro-surfacing emulsion (MSE) shall be homogenous and shall conform to the provisions of these Special Provisions. The polymer shall be milled or blended into the asphalt or blended into the emulsifier solution prior to the emulsification process.

The MSE shall conform to the following requirements when tested in conformance with the following test methods:

Polymer Modified, Cationic Micro-Surfacing Emulsion (MSE) Specific Designation Test Method Requirement
Viscosity SSF @ 25°C AASHTO T59 15 – 90 seconds
Sieve, max AASHTO T59 0.30 percent
Settlement, 5 days, max ASTM D6930 or AASHTO T59 5 percent Storage Stability, 1 day, max AASHTO T59 1 percent
Residue by Evaporation, min California Test 331 64 percent Specification Designation for Residue
Specific Designation Test Method Requirement
Penetration @ 25°C, 100g, 5s,

0.1 mm
AASHTO T49 40 – 90
Softening Point, min AASHTO T53 61°C
G*, @ 20°C, 10 rad/seca AASHTO T315 Report Only
Phase angle @ 50°C, 10
rad/sec, PA (max) – PA baseb
AASHTO T315 Report Only
Stiffness, @ -12°C, MPa and M-
value
AASHTO T315 Report Only
Torsional Recovery, % California Test 332 >21%
Polymer Content, % (by weight) California Test 402 >3.5% 25mm plates for the 50°C test.
8mm plates for the 20°C test.
37-3.03B(2) Water and Additives
Water shall be of such quality that the asphalt will not separate from the MSE before the micro-surfacing is placed on the pavement. If necessary for workability, a set-control agent that will not adversely affect the micro-surfacing product may be used.
37-3.03B(3) Mineral Filler
Mineral filler shall be Portland cement or hydrated lime that is free of lumps. Portland cement shall be either Type I, Type II, or combination thereof. The type of mineral filler shall be determined by the Contractor based on laboratory mix designs. The mineral filler will be considered part of the aggregate gradation requirement.
37-3.03B(4) Aggregate
The aggregate used for micro-surfacing shall be Type II. The material shall be free from vegetation matter and other deleterious substances. Aggregate shall be free of lumps and oversize particles. The aggregate shall be 100% crushed with no rounded particles, volcanic in origin and black in color. The use of gray or light-colored aggregate shall not be allowed. The Contractor shall specify in the bid proposal the name and location of the black rock aggregate quarry and shall provide certification at the preconstruction conference that the rock was crushed a minimum of 90 days prior. The Contractor shall submit samples of the black rock aggregate to the Engineer for review and acceptance.

Aggregate, prior to the addition of the MSE, shall conform to the provisions of these Special Provisions. If aggregates are blended, each component aggregate shall conform to the Sand Equivalent and Durability Index requirements of these Special Provisions when tested in conformance with the respective California Tests.

The percentage composition by mass of the aggregate (including mineral filler) shall conform to the following grading requirements when tested in conformance with California Test 202:

Type II
Sieve Size Percent Passing
3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 100
#4 (4.75 mm) 94 – 100
#8 (2.36 mm) 65 – 90
#16 (1.18 mm) 40 – 70
#30 (600 µm) 25 – 50
#200 (75 µm) 5 – 15
The aggregate (excluding mineral filler) shall conform to the following quality requirements:

Type II
Test California Test Requirement
Sand Equivalent (min) 217 70
Durability Index (min) 229 75
Percentage of Crushed Particles
(min)1
205 100%
Los Angeles Rattler
Loss at 500 Rev. (max)2
211 35%
1 CT205, Section D, is amended to read: “Any particle having 2 or more freshly, mechanically fractured faces shall be considered a crushed particle.”
2 Los Angeles Rattler shall be performed on the parent aggregate before crushing.

If the results of the aggregate grading do not meet the specified gradation, the micro-surfacing represented by the test shall be removed within 5 working days of the Engineer’s written notice. However, if requested in writing by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer, the micro-surfacing represented by the tests containing a percentage passing (PP) range value +/- 1 in any of the Sieve sizes, but not greater than +/-4, may remain in place. The Contractor shall pay to the City the following amount for the screenings represented by the test and left in place:

Sieve Sizes Percentage
Passing
Allowable
Tolerances
Allowable
Tolerances
Allowable
Tolerances
Allowable
Tolerances
3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 100 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #4 (4.75 mm) 94 – 100 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #8 (2.36 mm) 65 – 90 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #16 (1.18 mm) 40 – 70 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #30 (600 µm) 25 – 50 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 #200 (75 µm) 5 – 15 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PAYMENT TO CITY $5.00 per ton $7.50 per ton $10.00 per ton $15.00 per ton If the results of the Sand Equivalent test for aggregate do not meet the specified requirement, the micro- surfacing represented by the test shall be removed within 5 working days of the Engineer’s written notice.

However, if requested in writing by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer, the Micro-surfacing represented by the tests containing a sand equivalent Value below 70, but not less than 65, may remain in place. The Contractor shall pay to the City the following amount for the screenings represented by the test and left in place:

Sand Equivalent Payment to City
70 or over NONE
68 – 69 $5.00 per ton
66 – 67 $7.50 per ton
65 $10.00 per ton
If the results of the Durability Index test for aggregate do not meet the specified requirement, the micro- surfacing represented by the test shall be removed within 5 working days of the Engineer’s written notice.

However, if requested in writing by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer, the micro-surfacing represented by the tests containing a durability index value below 75, but not less than 70, may remain in place. The Contractor shall pay to the City the following amount for the screenings represented by the test and left in place:

Durability Index Payment to City
75 or over NONE
73 – 74 $5.00 per ton
71 – 72 $7.50 per ton
70 $10.00 per ton
When the results of 2 or all 3 of the aggregate grading, the Sand Equivalent, and Durability Index tests do not conform to the specified requirements, both or all three payments to the City shall apply. The City shall deduct these amounts from any moneys due or to become due to the Contractor.

Any progress payment made after the completion date shall not be construed as a waiver of material deductions.

No single aggregate grading, durability index or Sand Equivalent test shall represent more than 300 tons or one day's production, whichever is smaller.
37-3.03B(4)(a) Aggregate for Rut filling
Micro-surfacing (Type III) shall be used for rut filling and shall conform to these Special Provisions.

The aggregate used for Type III shall be grey rock aggregate. The grey rock aggregate shall be 100% crushed with no rounded particles. The material shall be free from vegetation and other deleterious substances. The Contractor shall submit samples and test results of the grey rock aggregate to the Engineer for review and acceptance.

The percentage composition by mass of the aggregate (including mineral filler) shall conform to the following grading requirements when tested in conformance with California Test 202:

Type III
Sieve Size Percent Passing
3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 100
#4 (4.75 mm) 70 – 90
#8 (2.36 mm) 45 – 70
#16 (1.18 mm) 28 – 50
#30 (600 µm) 19 – 34
#200 (75 µm) 5 – 15
The aggregate (excluding mineral filler) shall conform to the following quality requirements:

Type III
Test California Test Requirement
Sand Equivalent (min) 217 70
Durability Index (min) 229 70
Percentage of Crushed Particles
(min)1
205 100%
Los Angeles Rattler
Loss at 500 Rev. (max)2
211 35%
1 CT205, Section D, is amended to read: “Any particle having 2 or more freshly, mechanically fractured faces shall be considered a crushed particle.”
2 Los Angeles Rattler shall be performed on the parent aggregate before crushing.

Sieve Sizes Percentage
Passing
Allowable
Tolerances
Allowable
Tolerances
Allowable
Tolerances
Allowable
Tolerances
3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 100 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #4 (4.75 mm) 70 – 90 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #8 (2.36 mm) 45 – 70 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #16 (1.18 mm) 28 – 50 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 2 PP +/- 3 PP +/- 4 #30 (600 µm) 19 – 34 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 #200 (75 µm) 5 – 15 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PP +/- 1 PAYMENT TO CITY $5.00 per ton $7.50 per ton $10.00 per ton $15.00 per ton If the results of the Sand Equivalent test for aggregate do not meet the specified requirement, the micro- surfacing represented by the test shall be removed within 5 working days of the Engineer’s written notice.

However, if requested in writing by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer, the micro-surfacing represented by the tests containing a sand equivalent Value below 70, but not less than 65, may remain in place. The Contractor shall pay to the City the following amount for the screenings represented by the test and left in place:

However, if requested in writing by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer, the micro-surfacing represented by the tests containing a durability index value below 70, but not less than 65, may remain in place. The Contractor shall pay to the City the following amount for the screenings represented by the test and left in place:

Any progress payment made after the completion date shall not be construed as a waiver of material deductions.

No single aggregate grading, durability index, or Sand Equivalent test shall represent more than 300 tons or one day's production, whichever is smaller.
37-3.03B(5) Mix Design
At least 7 working days before the micro-surfacing placement commences, the Contractor shall submit for approval of the Engineer a laboratory report of tests and a proposed mix design covering the specific materials proposed for use on the project.

The percentages of each individual material proposed in the mix design shall be shown in the laboratory report. Individual materials shall be within the following limits:

Micro-surfacing Mix Design
Material Proportion Limits
Residual Asphalt 7.5% to 10.5% by dry mass of
aggregate
Mineral Filler 0% to 3% by dry mass of aggregate
Additive As needed
Water As needed
Adjustments may be required during construction based on field conditions.

The mix design and aggregate tests shall be performed by a laboratory capable of performing the applicable International Slurry Surfacing Association (ISSA) tests. The proposed micro-surfacing mixture shall conform to the specified requirements when tested in conformance with the following tests:

Test ISSA Test Method Requirements
Wet Cohesion
@ 30 minute (Set) (min)
@ 60 minute (Traffic) (min)
TB* 139
12 kg-cm
20 kg-cm
Excess Asphalt TB* 109 540 g/m2
Wet Stripping (min) TB* 114 90%
TB* = Technical Bulletin
Test ISSA Test Method Requirements
Wet Track Abrasion
6-day soak loss (max)
1-hour soak
TB* 100
810 g/m2
538 g/m2
Displacement
Lateral (max)
Specific Gravity after 1000
cycles of 56.8 kg (max)
TB* 147A
5%

2.10 Classification Compatibility TB* 144 (AAA, BAA) 11 Grade Points Mix Time @ 25°C TB* 113 Controllable to 120 seconds
TB* = Technical Bulletin
The laboratory that performed the tests and designed the mixture shall sign the laboratory report. The report shall show the results of the tests on individual materials and shall compare their values to those required by these Special Provisions. The report shall clearly show the proportions of aggregate, filler (minimum and maximum), water (minimum and maximum), set control additive, and MSE solids content (minimum and maximum) based on the dry mass of aggregate. The laboratory shall report the quantitative effects of moisture content on the unit mass of the aggregate (bulking effect) in conformance with the requirements of ASTM Designation C 29M. Previous laboratory reports covering the same materials may be accepted provided the material test reports were completed within the previous 12 months. The mix design shall further show the recommended changes in mineral filler, water, and additive proportions for high temperature weather conditions by reporting proportions of materials required for 60 seconds of mix time with materials heated to 100°F. This 100°F mixing report will not be required for projects requiring nighttime application.

The component materials used in the mix design shall be representative of the micro-surfacing materials proposed by the Contractor for use on the project.

Once the mix design is approved by the Engineer, no substitution of other material will be permitted unless the materials proposed for substitution are first tested and a laboratory report is submitted for the substituted design in conformance with the provisions of these Special Provisions. Substituted materials shall not be used until the mix design for those materials has been approved by the Engineer.

The completed mixture, after addition of water and set control agent, if used, shall be such that the micro- surfacing mixture has proper workability. At the expiration of the road closure hours, in conformance with the provisions in these Special Provisions, the micro-surfacing mixture shall be sufficiently cured to support unrestricted traffic.
37-3.03C Construction
37-3.03C(1) Surface Preparation
Before placing the micro-surfacing, the pavement surface shall be cleaned by sweeping, flushing or by other means necessary to remove loose particles of paving, dirt, vegetation, and other extraneous material. When required, the roadway surface may be fogged with water ahead of the spreader box. The application of the fog spray may be adjusted to suit temperatures, surface texture, humidity and dryness of pavement.
37-3.03C(2) Weather Conditions
The micro-surfacing mixture shall not be placed when the ambient temperature is below 50°F or during unsuitable weather. Micro-surfacing shall not be placed if rain is imminent or if there is the possibility that there will be freezing temperatures within 24 hours.
37-3.03C(3) Equipment
37-3.03C(3)(a) General
The equipment used by the Contractor for pavement cleaning and excess aggregate removal shall include a self-propelled rotary power broom, mobile pick-up broom or top dumping mobile pick-up broom. 37-3.03C(3)(b) Mixing and Spreading Equipment
The micro-surfacing shall be mixed in continuous pugmill mixers of adequate size and power for the type of micro-surfacing to be placed. All indicators shall be in conformance with the provisions of these Special Provisions and shall be in working order prior to commencing mixing and spreading operations.

Mixer-spreader trucks shall be equipped to proportion the MSE, water, aggregate, mineral filler, and set- control additives by volume. Rotating and reciprocating equipment on mixer-spreader trucks shall be covered with metal guards.

The mixer-spreader truck shall not be operated unless low-flow and no-flow devices and revolution counters are in good working condition and functioning and metal guards are in place. Indicators required by these Special Provisions shall be visible while walking alongside the mixer-spreader truck.

Aggregate feeders shall be connected directly to the drive on the emulsion pump. The drive shaft of the aggregate feeder shall be equipped with a revolution counter reading to the nearest one-tenth of a revolution.

In addition to the requirements of the fourth paragraph of section 5-1.33, “Equipment,” of the State Standard Specifications, the identifying number of mixer-spreader trucks shall be at least 3 inches in height, located on the front and rear of the vehicle.

The micro-surfacing mixture shall be spread by means of a spreader box conforming to sections 37-

3.03C(3)(b)(i) and 37-3.03C(3)(b)(ii).
37-3.03C(3)(b)(i) Spreader Box
The mixture shall be agitated and spread uniformly in the surfacing box by means of motor driven twin- shafted paddles or spiral augers fixed in the spreader box. A front seal shall be provided to insure no loss of the mixture at the road contact point. The rear seal shall act as a final strike-off and shall be adjustable. The spreader box and rear strike-off shall be so designed and operated that a uniform consistency is achieved to produce a free flow of material to the rear strike-off. The spreader box shall have suitable means provided to side shift the box to compensate for variations in the pavement geometry, the box shall be adjustable. Spreader box skids shall be maintained in such manner as to prevent chatter (wash boarding) in the finished mat. The spreader box in use shall be clean and free of micro-surfacing and MSE at the start of each work shift.

The spreader box shall have a series of strike-off devices at the rear of the box. The leading strike-off device shall be fabricated of steel, stiff rubber or other suitable material. The number of strike-off devices shall be determined by the Contractor. The first strike-off device shall be designed to maintain close contact with the pavement during the spreading operations, shall obtain the thickness required, and shall be capable of being adjusted to the various pavement cross sections for application of a uniform micro- surfacing finished surface. The final strike-off device shall be fabricated of flexible material suitable for the intended use and shall be designed and operated to ensure a uniform texture is achieved in the finished surface of the micro-surfacing. The final strike-off device shall be cleaned or changed daily if problems with longitudinal scouring occur.

Flexible fabric drags attached to the rear of the spreader box shall not be used. 37-3.03C(3)(b)(ii) Wheel Path Depression (Rut) Box
The wheel path depression (rut) box shall be designed to have adjustable strike-off devices to regulate the depth and shall have a width of between 5 feet and 6 feet. Hydraulic augers, or similar devices, shall be installed and shall be capable of moving the mixed material from the rear to the front of the filling chamber. These devices shall also be capable of guiding the larger aggregate into the center, deeper section of the wheel path depression, and forcing the finer material toward the outer edges of the spreader box.

The micro-surfacing mixture, to be spread in areas inaccessible to the controlled spreader box, may be spread by other methods upon approval of the Engineer.

Flexible fabric drags attached to the rear of the wheel path depression (rut) box shall not be used. 37-3.03C(3)(c) Mixer and Spreader Truck Calibration
Each mixer/spreader truck used on the project shall be calibrated in accordance with California Test 109.

The trucks shall be calibrated for rock, emulsion, cement, additives, and any mineral filler used.

Calibrations shall take place a maximum of 10 days prior to application of micro-surfacing. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer a minimum of 3 working days prior to calibration so that City representatives may make arrangements to observe.

For all material calibrated, 3 consecutive runs per gate setting shall be completed and these 3 test runs must not deviate from their combined mathematical average by more than 2.0%.

Calibrations will take place at most once a week or as required by the Engineer and no machine will be allowed to work on the project until the calibration has been completed and/or accepted 3 working days before the start of work. Weigh back tickets shall be submitted at the end of each work day that micro- surfacing is placed.
37-3.03C(4) Proportioning
Aggregate, mineral filler, MSE, water, and additives, including the set-control agent, if used, shall be proportioned by volume utilizing the mix design approved by the Engineer. If more than 1 kind of aggregate is used, the correct amount of each kind of aggregate to produce the required grading shall be proportioned separately, prior to adding the other materials of the mixture, in a manner that will result in a uniform and homogeneous blend.

The aggregate shall be proportioned using a belt feeder operated with an adjustable cutoff gate. The height of the gate opening shall be determinable. The MSE shall be proportioned by a positive displacement pump. Variable rate emulsion pumps, if used, shall be calibrated and sealed in the pump's calibrated condition in conformance with California Test 109 prior to usage.

The delivery rate of aggregate and MSE per revolution of the aggregate feeder shall be calibrated at the appropriate gate settings for each mixer-spreader truck used on the project in conformance with California Test 109 and in conformance with the provisions of these Special Provisions.

The aggregate belt feeder shall deliver aggregate to the pugmill with such volumetric consistency that the deviation for any individual aggregate delivery rate check-run shall not exceed 2.0 percent of the mathematical average of 3 runs of at least 3 tons each. The emulsion pump shall deliver MSE to the pugmill with such volumetric consistency that the deviation for any individual delivery rate check-run shall be within 2.0 percent of the mathematical average of 3 runs of at least 300 gallons each. The water pump shall deliver water to the pugmill with such volumetric consistency that the deviation for any individual delivery rate check-run shall be within 2.0 percent of the mathematical average of 3 runs of at least 300 gallons each.

The MSE storage tank shall be located immediately before the emulsion pump and shall be equipped with a device which will automatically shut down the power to the emulsion pump and aggregate belt feeder when the MSE level is lowered to a point where the pump suction line is exposed.

A temperature-indicating device shall be installed in the emulsion storage tank at the pump suction level.

The device shall indicate the temperature of the MSE and shall be accurate to within 10°F.

The belt delivering the aggregate to the pugmill shall be equipped with a device to monitor the depth of aggregate being delivered to the pugmill. The device for monitoring the depth of aggregate shall automatically shut down the power to the aggregate belt feeder whenever the depth of aggregate is less than the target depth of flow. A second device shall be located where the device will monitor the movement of the aggregate belt by detecting revolutions of the belt feeder. The devices for monitoring no flow or belt movement shall automatically shut down the power to the aggregate belt when the aggregate belt movement is interrupted. The device to detect revolutions of the belt feeder will not be required where the aggregate delivery belt is an integral part of the drive chain. To avoid erroneous shutdown by normal fluctuation, a delay of 3 seconds will be permitted between sensing and shutdown of the operation.
37-3.03C(5) Application Rate of Aggregate
Micro-surfacing spread rates must be within the ranges shown on the following table:

Micro-surfacing Type Application Range
(lb of dry aggregate/sqyd)
Type II 15 – 18
Type III 20 – 30
The micro-surfacing mixture shall be uniformly spread on the existing surfacing within the rate specified without spotting, re-handling, or otherwise shifting of the mixture. 37-3.03C(6) Repair Wheel Path Depressions
When wheel path depressions have a cross section that is deformed 1/2 inch or more, the individual wheel paths shall first be filled utilizing a wheel path depression (rut) box. The depth of the wheel path depression shall be determined after the adjacent ridges have been removed, when applicable. The maximum single application for wheel path depressions shall be 1 inch. Wheel path depressions of depths greater than 1 inch shall require multiple applications in each depression. A pneumatic tired roller shall be used after all rut filling operations. The roller shall make 2 passes at slow speed no more than 7 mph. Wheel path depressions having a cross section greater than 1/2 inch and less than 1 inch shall be paid for under the contract bid item “Micro-surfacing (Type III)”.

Wheel path depression repair shall be constructed with a slight crown to allow for initial compaction by traffic on the micro-surfacing.

Freshly filled wheel path depressions shall be compacted by traffic for a minimum of 12 hours before additional lifts of micro-surfacing material are placed for rut filling purposes or as surface courses. 37-3.03C(7) Placement
Micro-surfacing shall be placed no earlier than 7 calendar days after Chip Seal operation on roads to receive the Roseville Cape Seal as shown on the plans.

Longitudinal joints shall correspond with the edges of the traffic lanes. The Engineer may permit other patterns of longitudinal joints if the patterns will not adversely affect the quality of the finished product, this shall be required for approval in writing 5 working days prior to the start of work.

Through traffic lanes shall be spread in full lane widths only. Longitudinal joints common to 2 traffic lanes shall be butt joints with overlaps not to exceed 3 inches. Building paper shall be placed at the transverse joints to avoid double placement of the micro-surfacing. Other suitable methods to avoid double placement of the micro-surfacing will be allowed. Hand tools shall be available to remove spillage.

The mixture shall be uniform and homogeneous after placing on the surfacing and shall not show separation of the MSE and aggregate after setting. The completed surface shall be of uniform texture and free from ruts, humps, depressions, or irregularities.

Adequate means shall be provided to protect the micro-surfacing from damage by traffic until such time that the mixture has cured sufficiently so that the micro-surfacing will not adhere to or be picked up by the tires of vehicles.

If the micro-surfacing is not capable of supporting unrestricted traffic at the expiration of the road closure hours, the Contractor shall pay the liquidated damaged per the provisions of these Special Provisions.

Placement of the micro-surfacing shall cease before the expiration of road closure hours as specified in these Special Provisions.
37-3.03C(8) Sweeping
Initial sweeping shall begin 1 day after the micro-surfacing placement. Care shall be taken to avoid unraveling the micro-surfacing. Excessive sweeping will not be allowed.

Seven sweepings shall be considered as included in the contract price paid for micro-surfacing. The first sweeping shall be performed the day after the application is applied. The second sweeping shall be performed 3 days after the micro-surfacing application is applied. The third sweeping shall be performed 5 days after the micro-surfacing application is applied. The forth sweeping shall be performed 7 days after the micro-surfacing is applied. The fifth sweeping shall be performed 10 days after the micro-surfacing is applied. The sixth sweeping shall be performed 15 days after the micro-surfacing is applied. The seventh sweeping shall be performed during the punch list process.

Prior to each sweeping, the Contractor shall contact the Engineer with the street’s sweeping schedule.

After sweeping takes place, the Contractor shall contact the Engineer for acceptance of the street sweeping.

If the sweeping is not done to the schedule listed above, the Contractor shall pay the liquidated damaged per the provisions of these Special Provisions.

The Contractor shall remove all loose aggregate from the curbs, gutters, driveways, and sidewalks prior to sweeping the roadway surface. The Contractor will be responsible to sweep abutting adjacent areas and haul routes. The Contractor shall have 1 working day to sweep the adjacent areas and haul route when requested in writing by the Engineer.

The Contractor shall sweep the micro-surfaced streets and adjacent areas with a self-propelled vacuum or regenerative air sweeper. Any additional sweepings required to remove excess material shall be performed as directed by the Engineer at no additional expense to the City.

If rain is anticipated on sweeping days, the contractor shall re-schedule sweeping and notify the Engineer of the rescheduled date.
37-3.03C(9) Test Strip
The Contractor shall construct a test strip for evaluation by the Engineer 10 working days prior to the micro-surfacing application. The test strip shall be 500 feet to 1000 feet long and shall consist of the application courses specified. The test strip shall be constructed at the same time of day or night that the full production of micro-surfacing will be placed and may be constructed in 2 days or nights when multiple course applications are specified. The location of the test strip shall be specified by the City. The crew utilized to place the test strip shall be same as the crew that places microsurfacing for the remainder of the project.

The micro-surfacing test strip shall have a break time and shall be able to be open to cross traffic no greater than 1 hour after the micro-surfacing is placed. This time will be reflected on the global projects break time and capability of being open to cross traffic. The global project shall have this break time and shall be able to be open to cross traffic no greater than 1 hour after placement of the micro-surfacing. If the test strip does not meet this requirement the test strip will be rejected and shall be removed at the Contractors expense.

The Engineer will evaluate the completed test strip after 12 hours of traffic on the completed test strip to determine if the mix design and placement procedure are acceptable. If the mix design or the placement procedure is determined by the Engineer to be unacceptable, the test strip will be rejected, the Contractor shall make modifications, and a new test strip shall be constructed and evaluated by the Engineer. The cost of materials and placement of the test strips, which have been rejected, shall be borne by the Contractor and will not be considered as part of the contract work. If ordered by the Engineer, rejected test strips shall be removed at the Contractors expense. 37-3.03C(10) Repair of Early Distress
If bleeding, raveling, delamination, rutting, or washboarding occurs within 60 days after placing the micro- surfacing, the Contractor shall diligently pursue repairs by any method approved by the Engineer. The Contractor shall not be relieved from maintenance until repairs have been completed. 37-3.03D Payment
The payment quantity for micro-surfacing bid items paid for by weight is the weight determined by combining the weights of the aggregate and micro-surfacing emulsion. The payment quantity for micro- surfacing does not include the weights of added water, mineral filler, and additives.

Weight shall be determined from calibrations and revolutions per day and verified with weight back tickets. The revolutions for each truck shall be submitted to the construction inspector prior to the start of work and the final revolution count shall be submitted to the construction inspector at the end of the day for every day micro-surfacing is applied, work shall not be permitted until these requirements are met.

All weight tickets including aggregate and emulsion tickets shall be turned in on a daily basis. For materials that is stockpiled prior to the start of the project, those tickets are required on a daily basis and at the end of the business day. In that case, upon project completion, weight back tickets are required for the emulsion and leftover stockpile aggregate shall be deducted and removed.

Full compensation for conforming to all requirements specified in section 37-3.03, “Micro-Surfacings” shall be considered as included in the contract unit price paid per ton for “Micro-Surfacing (Type II)”.

The Contractor shall use a spread rate of 17 pounds of dry aggregate per square yard to determine the contract bid item for “Micro-surfacing Type II”.

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: Church Street and Pump Station 26 Collection System Improvements Project

Project Location(s): Sierra College Boulevard between Eureka Road and south of East Roseville Parkway, Roseville, CA 95747 and Church Street between Birch Street and Atkinson Street , Atkinson Street between Elm Stret and Hickory Street, and Hickory Street between Atkinson Street and Porter Drive, Roseville, CA 95661

Project Description: The Environmental Utilities Department (EU) is making upgrades to critical wastewater collections infrastructure at two locations: within Church Street, Atkinson Street, and Hickory Street (Church Street Collection System Improvements) and another site within Sierra College Boulevard, referred to as Pump 26 (PS 26). These improvements are needed to prevent future sanitary sewer overflows during storm events resulting in a violation of Wastewater Collection’s Waste Discharge Permit. The selected fix for this issue includes upsizing of multiple sewer gravity mains via pipe bursting, open cut installation of a new sewer gravity main, and abandonment of an existing gravity sewer main for the Church Street Collection System Improvements.

The PS 26 improvements were initially approved as a separate project in 2022, but the City decided to separate out the pipeline work, which has not yet been awarded. EU staff decided to combine the remaining PS 26 work, involving gravity sewer main pipe bursting, areas of open- cut pipe installation, and installation of a new weir manhole, with the Church S treet Collection System Improvements due to the similar nature of the work required. These trenchless methods will result in significant cost savings and a minimization of traffic disruptions, and the larger project size when combined with the Church Street Collection System Improvements creates a more attractive bid package. Both project located are entirely paved, and there are no sensitive habitats on the sites or immediately adjacent.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project qualifies for a Class 4 Categorical Exemption as described in Section 15304 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 4 (Minor Alterations to Land) consists of…minor public…alterations which do not involve the removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees…”

The project consists of improvements to pipelines and installation of new manholes located entirely within existing streets using primarily trenchless pipe bursting methods, with only select areas of open cut trenching. Both project areas are entirely within existing paved streets and are not located in or within the vicinity of sensitive areas and would not result in removal of a mature scenic tree(s).

Consequently the Class 4 Categorical Exemption applies.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Rana Moore, Roseville Department of Environmental Utilities (916- 774-5581).

Signature: Date: 4-22-2024
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3326
File #:
0709-02
Title:

HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL - Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Funding Recommendations
Contact:

Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/15/2024
Item #: 7.5.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve funding recommendations for the 2024-25 Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all related grant agreements.

BACKGROUND
For over a decade prior to 2017, the General Fund and Council Discretionary Funds made commitments to fund programs such as the hotel voucher program. In 2017, City of Roseville partnered with Sutter Health to create Roseville's Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing program (HPRR). Sutter Health's funding commitment ended in 2019. In 2017, SB 2 created the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund and the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program. The principal goal of this program is to make funding available to eligible local governments in California for housing-related projects and programs that assist in addressing the unmet housing needs of their local communities.

On June 23, 2020 the City of Rocklin adopted a resolution allowing Roseville Housing to apply for and administer their PLHA award. In July of 2020, City Council approved an application to the State of California for Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding for the Cities of Roseville and Rocklin. The Roseville Housing Division subsequently received awards for both applications, which supports the HPRR program with PLHA funds for a total of 5 years, through FY 25/26.

The goal of Roseville’s HPRR program is to provide temporary assistance to prevent a household from losing permanent housing and/or in obtaining permanent housing. Eligible services for this grant funding include temporary rental assistance, short-term hotel vouchers, housing relocation and stabilization services, housing navigation services, mediation and outreach to property owners, credit repair, security deposits, utility payments, and case management related to these activities. Supportive case management services allow people to obtain and retain housing. These services are extremely effective in reducing the financial burden and trauma of homelessness.

In 2013, Senate Bill 341 was adopted, which amended Section 34176.1 of the Health and Safety Code and allows up to $250,000 in Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (Low/Mod) resources to support homeless prevention programs. PLHA funding for FY2024-25 consists of City of Roseville's award for $268,646 and City of Rocklin's award for $115,424. Combining these funds with the allowable $250,000 in Low/Mod funds allows for a total of $634,070 this round. PLHA funds allow up to 5 percent of the awarded funds to be used for administration which equals $19,203.50 this cycle. HPRR programs and projects must serve households at or below extremely low income (0-30% of Area Median Income) and assist persons who are experiencing homelessness or at-risk of homelessness.

The Roseville Housing Division received five applications from seven agencies in response to the HPRR Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). Applications were reviewed using criteria from prior years as well as City Council's direction to place the greatest weight on measurable outcomes from prior awards. The review panel consisted of staff from City of Roseville Housing Division, City of Rocklin Community Development Department, and Roseville Police Department’s Social Services Unit. Based on available funding, the following is recommended:

Applicant
HPRR Program Activities
Recommendation
ASK (AMI Housing,
Saint Vincent de Paul,
and Kids First)
Hotel Vouchers, Utility Payments, Temporary
Rent, Rental Deposit, Case Management

$400,000

Latino Leadership
Council
Temporary Rent, Rental Deposit, Case
Management
$35,000
The Gathering Inn
Emergency Shelter, Resource Center,
Temporary Rent, Rental Deposit, Case
Management, Housing Coordination

$80,000

Salvation Army
Utility Payments, Temporary Rent, Money
Management classes

$25,000

Volunteers of America
Home Start
Emergency Shelter, Case Management

$75,000

City Administration
$19,070
Total
$634,070

Grantees are required to submit reporting every six months on specific program outcomes including total residents served and leveraging of funds to ensure efficient delivery of services.

The City continues to work to improve collaboration, efficiency, and outcomes by managing grants with performance-based measurements. As a result of these local policies, staff continues to see increased collaboration that reaches beyond city grant contracts. Once the recommendations are approved, staff will bring the grant agreements back to Council for approval.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing grant program has reduced costs to both the City of Roseville and the community as a whole. The recommended funding allocations utilize Housing Successor Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund and State of California Permanent Local Housing Allocation funding. The recommendations do not result in any cost to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing funding recommendations do not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore are not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Acrell, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-124

HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY

OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

RESOLUTION NO. 24-124

APPROVING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE GRANT AGREEMENTS

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, under Senate Bill 341, Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, can use up to $250,000 per year for the purposes of Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) Services; and

WHEREAS, in July of 2020, City Council approved an application to the State of California for Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding for the Cities of Roseville and Rocklin; and

WHEREAS, the Roseville Housing Division subsequently received awards for both applications and future funding of Roseville's HPRR program will be funded with Low/Mod and City of Roseville and Rocklin PLHA funds; and

WHEREAS, PLHA funding for FY2023-24 consists of Roseville's award for $268,646 and Rocklin's award for $115,424 along with the allowable $250,000 in Low/Mod funds allows for a total of $634,070 this round; and

WHEREAS, the City recently issued a Notice of Funding Availability regarding the availability of these funds as grants, for which five applications were received; and

WHEREAS, a review panel of staff from the City of Roseville Housing Division, City of Rocklin Community Development Department, and Roseville Police Department’s Social Services Unit, met to review applications and submitted funding recommendations for $634,070; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the funding recommendations for $634,070 as identified in the staff report are hereby approved and that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute all related grant agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___________ day of May 20_____, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES AGENCY MEMBERS:

NOES AGENCY MEMBERS:

ABSENT AGENCY MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN AGENCY MEMBERS:

______________________________
CHAIR
ATTEST:

___________________________
Secretary

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3317
File #:
0200
Title:

General Financial Analysis Services - Professional Services Agreement Contact:

Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected]
Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/15/2024
Item #: 7.6.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a professional services agreement with Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS), and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
The City contracts with consultants to perform various financial consulting services. EPS is a land economics consulting firm with over 30 years of experience in the full spectrum of services related to fiscal impact and analysis, public finance, and real estate market analysis. The City is currently working on several projects with EPS, including community facilities district formations and annexations, and staff recommends retaining EPS as the City's fiscal consultant. EPS is currently working on several projects for the City, but the current professional services agreement is set to expire on June 30, 2024. Approving a new agreement is in the City's best interests because it will allow the current projects to continue without delay and the City will not lose any traction by retaining a different consultant for these projects.

FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no fiscal impact from this agreement since the consulting services it covers will be for projects that will either be charged to an external party or, if not already budgeted, require staff to return to Council to recommend a budget adjustment. The three-year agreement allows services up to $100,000 per year, for an overall total compensation not to exceed $300,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-119
Professional Services Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 24-119

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for general financial analysis services, by and between the City of Roseville and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024]

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Project: General Financial Analysis Services

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.., a California corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY desires professional services consisting of general financial analysis services; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a proposal dated April 3, 2024, which describes the scope of work to be performed by CONSULTANT, the budget for the work, and the schedule for performance of the work; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide such professional services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for three (3) years, commencing on July 1, 2024 and expiring on June 30, 2027.
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 2 3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the budget estimate as described in EXHIBIT “A.” Total compensation shall not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per year, for an overall total compensation not to exceed three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000).

CONSULTANT shall submit one monthly invoice for its services. Such invoices shall be delineated by task, the person performing the services, and the hourly rate, which shall be stated in time increments of not greater than one tenth (1/10) hours. CITY shall pay invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

4. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.

CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY. [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 3 CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY

Workers’ Compensation Statutory

Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate

Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit

Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate

a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 4 primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 5 regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

6. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 6 this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

7. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

8. Prevailing Wages. When applicable, for purposes of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall comply with all applicable prevailing wage laws, e.g., but not limited to, California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. In accordance with said Section 1775, CONSULTANT shall forfeit as a penalty to the City two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any work done on-site under the Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subcontractor in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Labor Code Sections 1770 to 1780, inclusive. In addition to said penalty and pursuant to said Section 1775, the difference between such stipulated prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage shall be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or the applicable subcontractor.

Pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1773, the contracting department has identified the source, stated below, of the general prevailing rate of wages [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 7 applicable to the site to be done, for straight time, overtime, and holiday work. The holiday wage rate listed shall be applicable to all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining agreement of the particular craft, classification or type of worker concerned. These wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

9. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

10. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

11. Public Contracts: Conflicts of Interest. CONSULTANT’s duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting CITY with any portion of the CITY’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with CITY. CITY shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 8 CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

12. Governing Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and its EXHIBITS, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. In the event of any conflict between any of the EXHIBITS, the provisions of the first in order of attachment shall govern.

13. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

14. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 9 without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on- call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

15. Representations and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

16. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

17. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible material (“Material”) created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 10 and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

In the event that CONSULTANT uses, employs, designates, or retains any person or entity who is not an employee of CONSULTANT, to perform any work required of it pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall require said person or entity to execute an agreement containing the preceding paragraph.

18. Termination of Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice. In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any Material, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

19. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024] 11 regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

20. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

21. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

22. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT

Dennis Kauffman Jamie Gomes, Managing Director
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 311 Vernon Street 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 701
Roseville, CA 95678 Sacramento, CA 95814

Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

23. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

(SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/09/2024] 12 CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, municipal corporation INC., a California corporation

BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________ City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________

BY: _______________________________

C ARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney

APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

DENNIS KAUFFMAN
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

Jason Moody
President/Managing Principal
Jamie Gomes
Chief Financial Officer/Managing Director

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D001\P006\00085831.DOCX;04/15/2024]

EXHIBIT “A”

April 3, 2024
Dennis Kaufmann
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Subject: Master Services Agreement for Financial Consulting Services for Fiscal Year 2024-27; EPS #242059
Dennis:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide consulting services to the City of Roseville (City). EPS has enjoyed working with the City over the years and looks forward to continuing that relationship in the next fiscal year and beyond.

EPS understands the annual master services agreement for financial consulting services would begin in Fiscal Year 2024-25 and would be for a 3-year term.

Scope of Services
As may be requested by the City, EPS will provide ongoing financial consulting services to support the City’s needs.

Historically, EPS has assisted the City with the following types of analyses:
• Fiscal Impact Analyses
• Land-Secured Financing District Formation (Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts)
• Economic Impact Analyses
• Public Finance (e.g., property tax sharing, development impact fees, Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts) • Real Estate Market and Feasibility Analyses
• Reuse, Revitalization, and Redevelopment Projects

Dennis Kaufmann
April 3, 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2
Consistent with ongoing practices, when the City requests one or more specific services, EPS will prepare a Scope of Work in response to such a request.

That specific Scope of Work will be accompanied by a budget identified for that specific task order.

Staffing
Key personnel expected to respond to City needs are Managing Director Jamie Gomes, Vice President Sean Fisher, Principal Amy Lapin, and Managing Principal David Zehnder, all of whom work in EPS’s Sacramento office.

Additional EPS staff are anticipated to provide additional technical support as needed.

Budget
EPS charges for its services on a direct-cost (hourly billing rates plus direct expenses), not-to-exceed basis; therefore, you will be billed only for the work completed up to the maximum authorized annual budget amount of $100,000.

Travel, data, or reproduction expenses will be billed at cost, and invoices are submitted monthly and are payable on receipt. EPS’s current Hourly Billing Rates sheet is attached as part of this letter scope.

Again, EPS appreciates the opportunity to work with the City. Please call either of us at (916) 649-8010 if you have questions or require changes to this proposal.

Sincerely,
E
CONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC. (EPS)
Jamie Gomes David Zehnder
Managing Director Managing Principal
Attachment

2024 Hourly Billing Rates
Sacramento Office
Managing Principal $320
Principal $300
Senior Vice President $260
Senior Consultant $260
Vice President $245
Senior Technical Associate $215
Senior Associate $215
Associate $195
Research Analyst II $155
Research Analyst I $105
Production and Administrative Staff $100

Billing rates updated annually.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3328
File #:
0206-08-01
Title:
2024/2025 Landscaping and Lighting Districts Assessments - Initiate Proceedings, Intent to Levy, Approval of Engineer's Reports
Contact:

Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected]
Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 5/15/2024
Item #: 7.7.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following resolutions:

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025
.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025
.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025
.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025
.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025
.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year
2024/2025.

Staff also recommends that June 5, 2024 at 6 p.m. be set as the date and time to hold the public hearing.

The preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports will only include an unsigned affidavit. The Engineer's Reports will have a signed affidavit when the item is brought back to Council for final approval of the final Engineer's Reports at the Public Hearing.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville currently has eight active Landscaping and Lighting Districts (LLDs). These districts were formed within the City of Roseville to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of public improvements pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the Act) Sections 22500, et seq., and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

The Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 2006 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance and operation of improvements benefiting parcels within the District. The cost of maintaining the streetscape improvements is spread equally to the subject properties, based on their percentage of the total front footage of all affected parcels. The District is located in the Historic Old Town area in Downtown Roseville.

The Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1995 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance of certain public improvements that benefit parcels within the District. The District is located in the Infill Plan area.

The Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1989 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance of certain public landscape, open space, floodway and stream courses located within the Southeast Roseville Specific Plan area.

The North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1990 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance of certain public improvements within the North Central Roseville Specific Plan area. In 2004, the property owners in the district approved, through a mailed ballot, an assessment increase and the addition of an annual escalation factor.

This enables the City to keep up with increased costs associated with maintaining the landscaping at proper levels.

The Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1989 to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of certain public landscape medians and corridors, vernal pool preserves, bike trails, and park improvements. In 2004, the Dunmore Junction subdivision was annexed into the LLD as Zone A and the Legacy subdivision was annexed into Zone B. In 2011 the property owners voted against an overlay LLD for the Northwest Specific Plan. In 2006 and most recently in 2021, the property owners voted against an assessment increase as well as the addition of an annual escalation factor.

The Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1989 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance of certain public improvements within the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan Area. In 2005, the property owners in the district approved, through a mailed ballot, an assessment increase and an annual escalation factor. This enables the City to keep up with increased costs associated with maintaining the landscaping at proper levels.

The Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 2007 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance and operation of improvements benefiting parcels within the District. The cost of maintaining the streetscape improvements is spread equally to the subject properties, based on their percentage of the total front footage of all affected parcels.

The Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 2001 to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of improvements installed by the Vernon Streetscape. The cost of maintaining the streetscape improvements is spread equally to the subject properties on their percentage of the total front footage of all affected parcels.

Assessment Statistics
The reductions to the levies for the Infill Area LLD and the Olympus Pointe LLD result from changes in operating and rehab reserves. Both of these district levies are significantly below their maximum annual assessment.

FISCAL IMPACT
All charges are needed to fund landscape services in each LLD. There is no impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Adoption of these resolutions meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-126
Resolution 24-127
Resolution 24-128
Historic District LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
Resolution 24-129
Resolution 24-130
Resolution 24-131
Infill LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
Resolution 24-132
Resolution 24-133
Resolution 24-134
Johnson Ranch LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
Resolution 24-135
Resolution 24-136
Resolution 24-137
North Central LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
Resolution 24-138
Resolution 24-139
Resolution 24-140
Northwest Specific Plan LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
Resolution 24-141
Resolution 24-142
Resolution 23-143
Olympus Pointe LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
Resolution 24-144
Resolution 24-145
Resolution 24-146
Riverside Avenue LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
Resolution 24-147
Resolution 24-148
Resolution 24-149
Vernon Street LLD-FY24-25 Engineer's Report
1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-126

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

The City Cou ncil of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resol utions, formed the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenan t facilities and operations related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained W illdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Rep ort”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV ED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Repo rt concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: maintenance and opera tion of and the furnishing of services, materials and/or improvements for landscape, lighting, streetscape and hardscape areas, other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report.

The Engineer’s Report describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

2 RESOLUTION NO. 24-126

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _________________ ______________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, C ounty of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held o n the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-127

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “Dis trict”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance , operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council h as retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THE REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to seek the Annual Levy of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay the annual costs of the improvements.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for landscape, lighting , streetscape and hardscape areas, including fencing, walls, signage, monuments, ground cover, shrubs, plants, irrigation systems, drainage systems, other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements. 2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District.

The District is known and designated as:

“Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District”

Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Report. District Assessments are calc ulated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously autho rized by City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the pr ovisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 5 Public Hearing(s): The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing the publishing of this Resolution o nce in a local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.

3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-127

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _________________ ______________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held o n the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-128

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE , CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council ”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’ s Report”) for the district known and designated as the Historic District Landsca ping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Stre ets and Highways Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and,

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and,

WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the Dis trict, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and i s satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:

a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District

2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a perm anent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-128

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510

www.willdan.com
City of Roseville

Historic District
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2024/25 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: May 15, 2024
Public Hearing: June 5, 2024

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:

Historic District
Landscaping and Lighting District

City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California

This Report describes the District and any relevant zones therein, including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2024/25 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.

Reference is hereby made to the Placer County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this _____ day of _________, 2024

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Roseville

By: ________________________________
Mickey Ashley
Senior Project Analyst
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Stacee Reynolds
Principal Consultant
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW .................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION .................................2 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ...............................................2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT .................................2 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE ...........4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ................................................................. 6 A. GENERAL ............................................................................................................6 B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS ..........................................................................................6 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .......................9 D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT ...................................................11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ...................................................................................... 12 A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET .....................................................................................12 B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES ............................................................13 C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION .........................................13 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ..........................................................14 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN .........19 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ....................................................... 20 APPENDIX B — FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT ROLL .............................................. 23

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed on April 5, 2006 and is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”).

The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District, any new annexations, changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. The special benefit assessments are based on historical and estimated costs to maintain the District improvements. These assessments, which provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District, will provide funding for the operation and maintenance of Distri ct improvements.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Placer County Assessor’s Office. The Placer County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Tax Code Accounts, to identify on the County’s tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will by resolution order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2024/25. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2

B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION
The City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, beginning with Section 22500 (the “1972 Act”); Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”); and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, beginning with Government Code Section 53750 (the “Implementation Act”) (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”) initiated proceedings for the formation of the District on February 15, 2006 and to levy and collect annual assessments against lots and parcels within the District for FY 2006/07. On April 5, 2006, pursuant to Assessment Law, the City conducted a Public Hearing and tabulated the returned ballots. The City determined that a majority protest did not exist and approved the District’s maximum assessment rate and annual inflationary adjustment factor.

Pursuant to the 1972 Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls. The assessments described in this Report have been prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and Assessment Law.

C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The territory within the District consists of all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land as shown on the Boundary Map titled “Boundary Map of Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District” as referenced in Appendix A-1 of this Report.

The District is located within the City’s Historic Old Town, west of Highway 80, south of Pleasant Street, north and east of Washington Boulevard, and north and west of the Union Pacific Railroad. The District consists of mostly commercial parcels in a con centrated area of the Downtown primarily fronting the following streets: Church Street northeast of Washington Boulevard, Main Street between Washington Boulevard and Lincoln Street, Pacific Street and Lincoln Street where the improvements end approximately one block south of Pleasant Street.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3

of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:

The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting , and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4

the cost of the improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
The District, through the levy of special assessments, provides funding for ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements located within the public rights -of-ways and dedicated easements located within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, all materials, equipment, utilities, labor, and appurtenant facilities related to the ongoing maintenance of the improvements. Maintenance services will be provided by City personnel and/or private co ntractors. The proposed improvements to be maintained and services are generally described as follows:

Landscaping Improvements
The landscaping improvements have been designed to enhance the area within the District and may include, but are not limited to ground cover, shrubs and plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, trash receptacles, ornamental lighting, masonry walls o r other fencing, hardscape improvements, monuments and landmarks, recreational facilities and associated appurtenances located within the street rights-of-way and public areas within the District. Specifically, the proposed landscape improvement areas for this District are:

• Parkway landscaping and hardscape improvements within the public right of ways of the streets within the district including, but not limited to, Lincoln Street, Main Street, Church Street, Pacific Street, and the northeast side of Washington Boulevard estimated at 14,450 square feet of landscaping; • Various amenities associated with the landscape improvements and public areas within the District, including, but not limited to, trash receptacles, street furniture, bike racks, entry signs, sidewalks, fencing, and retaining walls.

Specifically, not included as District improvements are those improvements located on private property, improvements and facilities that are outside the boundaries of the District and/or are funded by other sources available to the City, including those portions of the median and parkway landscaping on Washington Boulevard (southwest side of the street) that are outside the District boundaries.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5

Public Lighting Improvements
The lighting improvements may include, but are not limited to, the cost of providing, maintaining, and servicing of lighting fixtures, poles, meters, conduits, electrical cable, and associated appurtenant facilities associated with:

• Lighting facilities within the landscaped areas and public areas including safety lights, security lights or ornamental lights installed as part of the District improvements; and
• Public street light improvements located on the streets within the District.

Specifically excluded from the assessment are the street light energy costs. These costs will continue to be paid for by the City from other revenue sources.

Detailed maps of the locations and descriptions of the specific improvements to be maintained by the District are on file in the Office of Public Works and by reference are made part of this Report.

Description of Maintenance and Services
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and street lighting improvements facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of al l or part of any of the landscaping and street lighting improvements, or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping improvements including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, mowing, spraying, fertilizing and tr eating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Servicing means the furnishing of water and electricity for the irrigation of the landscape improvements or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation of the landscaping improvements or appurtenant facilities. The street lighting improvements shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination; however, the City will be paying the actual energy costs to provide illumination.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6

II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

A. GENERAL
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping , and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the Improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel.

B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property -related service”;
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7

imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments. These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.

The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the District as well as provide for the annual maintenance of those improvements, and the assessment rev enues generated by District will be used solely for such purposes.

The costs of the proposed improvements have been identified and allocated to properties within the District based on special benefit. The improvements to be provided by this District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as an esse ntial component and local amenity that provides a direct reflection and extension of the properties within the District which the property owners and residents have expressed a high level of support.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) set forth in the Report is based on the premise that each assessed property receives special benefits from the landscape and lighting improvements within the District, and the assessment obligation for eac h parcel reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefits as compared to other properties that receive special benefits.

To identify and determine the proportional special benefit to each parcel within the District, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements provided as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. The improvements and the associated costs described in this Report, have been carefully reviewed and have been identified and allocated based on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of only those improvements determined to be of special benefit to properties within the District. The various public improvements and the associated costs have been identified as either “general benefit” (not assessed) or “special benefit”.

The City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with Article XIIID. Each of the proposed Improvements, the associated costs and assessments were identified and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the prov isions of Article XIIID and 1972 Act. Additionally, the Improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the Improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.

The City annually levies and collects special benefit assessments in order to maintain and service the District Improvements. The District provides for specific Improvements and services that include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and lightin g Improvements and associated appurtenances located within the District’s public rights -of-way and dedicated easements. The annual

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8

assessment is based on the historical and estimated costs to maintain the Improvements that provide a benefit to properties within these Districts. The Improvements within the District and the costs of those Improvements are identified and budgeted separately, including all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves.

All Improvements within the District and the properties associated with those Improvements were reviewed for benefit prior to the formation of the District.

Because the Improvements affront the benefited parcels, it has been determined that there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large. In making this determination it should be noted that similar improvements within California are typically maintained by individual property owners, through some type of association or a special district as allowed by State Law since the on-going maintenance of these improvements are a special benefit to the properties associated with those improvements.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) for the District is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the District receives special benefit from the Improvements maintained and financed by District assessments.

The presence of these Improvements and the close proximity of the Improvements to the properties within the District enhance the desirability and security of properties within the District.

The landscape Improvements provided by the District may include landscaped parkways, perimeters, entryways, local medians, slopes, internal amenities and appurtenant facilities. Street lighting Improvements may include all energy costs and necessary mainte nance to the facilities related thereto. The annual assessments outlined in this Report are proposed to cover the estimated costs to provide all necessary service, operation, administration, and maintenance required to keep these Improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. The special benefits associated with the local landscaping Improvements are specifically:

The special benefits associated with all landscaping Improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the Improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained Improvements associated with the properties.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9

• Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained landscaped areas. • Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well -maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise.

The special benefits of street lighting are the convenience, safety, and security of property, improvements, and goods. Specifically:
• Enhanced deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection. • Increased nighttime safety on streets and roads within the Districts. • Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved ingress and egress to property.
• Reduced vandalism and other criminal acts and damage to Improvements or property.
• Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties.

All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District.

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within the District a formula that spreads the costs of the maintenance based on the special benefit must be established. The improvements have been reviewed and the following formula has been established to apportion the maintenance costs based on benefit.

For purposes of the Assessment Methodology, the terms hereinafter set forth have been the following meanings:

Acreage means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on an Assessor’s Parcel map-, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor’s parcel map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, record of survey or other recorded document creating and describing such area of land.

Multi-Family Residential means a residence for which building permits have been issued for attached residential units for rental purposes.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10

Single-Family Residential Unit means a single residential home. This land use includes detached or attached for sale units intended for single-family occupancy.

Commercial means property being used or zoned for either commercial or industrial use.

Three components were used in the methodology to determine each parcels assessment; 1) Front footage of parcels along the proposed street improvements; 2) acreage of benefiting parcels; and 3) Current land use of parcels. Based on these three components the assessments were determined as follows:

First, the parcels Front Footage was determined based on Assessor’s Parcel maps or other sources. Only Front footage on streets that will be improved was used.

For parcels with Front Footage on more than one side (corner lots), the total Front Footage was divided by two to provide an average Front Footage. It was determined that twenty percent (20%) of the total budget was reasonably attributed to Front Footage; therefore twenty percent (20%) of the budget was spread to Front Footage.

Second, each parcel’s Acreage was calculated based on Assessors Parcels map.

It was determined that eighty percent (80%) of the budget was reasonably attributed to Acreage; therefore eighty (80%) of the budget was spread on Acreage. In the event that commo n area parcels are created subsequent to the formation of the District, the acreage of any such common area parcels shall be apportioned to the remaining assessable parcels of the subdivision and/or parcel split(s) related to the creation of the common area parcel(s).

Third, the current land use of the parcel was determined using the County’s secured roll. Parcels currently used as a Single-Family Residence or Multi-Family Residences were determined to receive twenty-five (25%) of the benefit in relation to commercial parcels. Additionally, it was determined that single Family Residential Parcels benefit equally from the improvements, therefore the total assessment calculated based on the formula was averaged between the five Single Family Residential parcels to determin e a Single-Family Residential rate per Unit.

The base year maximum assessment rates approved to be levied in FY 2006/07 are provided in the table below.

Base Year (FY 2006/07)
Maximum Assessment Rates
Land Use Front Footage Acreage Rate Flat Rate
Commercial $1.99 per Front Foot $2,582.41 per Acre N/A
Multi-Family Residential $0.50 per Front Foot $645.60 per Acre N/A Single-Family Residential N/A N/A $132.00 per Unit

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11

The following formula is used to calculate each parcel’s assessment (proportional benefit) for those parcels that are not Single-Family Residential parcels.

Front Footage Rate x Parcel’s Adjusted Front Footage = Parcel Front Footage Levy

Acreage Rate x Parcel’s Adjusted Acreage = Parcel Acreage Levy

Proposed Levy per Parcel = Parcel Front Footage Levy + Parcel Acreage Levy

The Assessment Range Formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District beginning in fiscal year 2007/08. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the Assessment is equal to the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by three percent (3%).

Beginning in the second fiscal year (Fiscal Year 2007/08) and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment would be recalculated, and a new Maximum Assessment established within the District.

The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater t han the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual assessment may remain unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjustment maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Ass essment, the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to balloting.

D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT
If the proposed assessment rates increase over the prior fiscal year’s maximum assessment rates by a percentage no greater than the 3%, then the proposed assessment rates are not considered an increase.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12

III. DISTRICT BUDGET

A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET

Fund balance information is reported in Section C on the following page.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13

B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES

C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14

D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS

Contract Maintenance - Landscaping - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition of all landscaping, irrigation and drainage systems and appurtenant facilities.

Repair and Maintenance - Landscaping - This item includes landscape improvement repair and maintenance costs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. Planned replacements or upgrades that provide a direct benefit to the District during the Current Fiscal Year may also be included. Costs could include the renovation of improvements such as irrigation systems.

Repair and Maintenance - Lighting - This item includes lighting improvement repair and maintenance costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. Planned replacements or upgrades that provide a direct benefit to the District during the Current Fiscal Year may also be included.

Repair and Maintenance - Streetscape and Signage - This item includes repair and maintenance costs of streetscape and sign improvements. Streetscape improvements include street furniture, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking stripes, brick pavers, benches, bike racks, and trash receptacles. This may inclu de repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. May include planned replacements or upgrades not listed below that provide a direct benefit to the District.

Repair & Maintenance – Tree Work - This line item includes annual costs for tree maintenance not included in the annual contract maintenance portion of the budget. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures - Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserve Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year that

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15

were previously funded or accumulated in the Rehabilitation Reserve. The Rehabilitation Reserve is used to accumulate funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation or replacement of District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

ADMINISTRATION COSTS

City Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City Finance Department and other Departments in preparing the annual budget for the Engineer’s Report, together with other financial information required to determine the annual assessment. These costs would also include the preparation, posting and publishing of public notices required for City Council action relating to the District, as well as the costs to perform legal review of documents.

Contract Administration – Park’s Dept – Estimated Costs of Park and Recreation Department staff to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and overall repair and maintenance of the District. This amount also includes the cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.

County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Consulting and Professional Services – Includes the costs and expenses of contracting with various professionals to provide legal, engineering and district administration services directly related to the District, including the calculation of the annual assessment amounts, the preparation of the Engineer’s’ Report.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out of pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

Replenishment/(Use) of Operating Reserve – A “Replenishment” increases the levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. On the other hand, a “Use” of the Operating Reserve decreases the levy by drawing funds from the Operating Reserve for current year expenditures. If zero, this line item m ay not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Operating Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16

Contribution for / (Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

BALANCE TO LEVY - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current fiscal year for each zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the total District costs together with any applicable adjustments to the budget as described above.

ASSESSMENT RATES:

Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels that are expected to be assessed. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government -owned land, public utility-owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights -of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District currently do not benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.

Total Assessable Front Footage – the total number of Front Feet within the District, adjusted for corner parcels, Multi -Family Residential and Single -Family Residential Parcels will be assessed as calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Section C of this Report.

Total Assessable Acreage – the total Acreage within the District, adjusted for Multi-Family Residential and Single -Family Residential Parcels that will be assessed as calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Section C of this Report.

Total Single-Family Residential Parcels – the total number of parcels currently being used as Single-Family Residences.

Applied Assessment Rates – The applied assessment rates for each of the District’s land use types.

Maximum Assessment Rates per Front Foot – The maximum dollar amount that can be assessed per Adjusted Front Foot for the District’s land use type for the current fiscal year.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17

Maximum Assessment Rates per Acre – The maximum dollar amount that can be assessed per Adjusted Acreage Foot for the District’s land use type for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Assessment Rate per SF Residential Unit – The maximum dollar amount that can be assessed per Single Family Unit within the District for the current fiscal year.

Potential Maximum Assessment – The total amount that is expected to be assessed against all parcels within the District for the Current Fiscal Year.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

OPERATING RESERVE

Beginning Operating Reserve Balance 7 -1-2024 (est.) - The anticipated beginning balance of cash and receivables net of any unpaid prior year obligations for each Zone. These beginning balances shall be used to fund each Zone’s expenditures from July 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024, as the Operating Reserve is required to compensate for the approximate six -month delay between the start of the District’s fiscal year and the receipt of the collections from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

Replenish from FY 2024/25 Levy – This amount is added to the FY 2024/25 levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six -month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Operating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from the period of July 1, 2024 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2024. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2024/25 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund FY 2024/25 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve may be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operating Reserve Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of July 1, 2024 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2024. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly , any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18

equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Operating Reserve Balance 6 -30-2025 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reserve balance/(deficit) for each Zone as of June 30, 2025. The size of each Zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance, service and incidental expenses from the first day of the fiscal year (Jul y 1) to the date that the Agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each Zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six -months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are received from the County. A ll Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

REHABILITATION RESERVE

Beginning Rehab Reserve Balance 7-1-2024 (est.) — The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of July 1, 2024. Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

Collect from FY 2024/25 Levy — This amount is added to the FY 2024/25 levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2024/25 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies expected to be transferred out of the Rehabilitation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly , any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department, in order to provide for the maintenance an d operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19

upgrades of District improvements which cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

Should the District have no Rehabilitation Reserve balances or related activity, no Rehabilitation Reserve information shall be presented in the Report.

E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

The Report provides a f ive-year Capital Improvement Pla n (“CIP”) which shows projected expenditures related to the rehabilitation, restoration and/or replacement of District improvements, and other allowable costs. The Current Fiscal Year CIP is shown in the preceding Budget Section A . The projected CIP costs for the remaining four years are provided below.

From time to time, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing needs due to the condition of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the Districts’ Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and/or operation of the improvements.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20

APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP

The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the 1972 Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report. These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a summary of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 21

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 22

FY 2024/25 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 23

APPENDIX B — FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT ROLL

Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

A listing of parcels to be assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, shall be submitted to the City Clerk, under separate cover, and by reference is made part of this Report.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-ways including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-ways; common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed, excepting common area parcel s. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

At the conclusion of the public hearing for the District and the proposed assessments, approval of the Report (as submitted or as modified) confirms the method of apportionment and the assessment rate to be levied against each eligible parcel and thereby c onstitutes the approved levy and collection of assessments for FY 2024/25. The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2024/25 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the Current Fiscal Year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
LAND

USE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
FRONT

FOOTAGE ACRES SF

UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
011-143-008-000 MFR 649.02$ 649.04$ 140.0 0.4821 0.0 LOTS 1 2 3 BLK 5 MCRAE ADDN 011-145-008-000 MFR 630.80 630.81 120.0 0.481 0.0 PARCEL 1 MAIN STREET PLAZA APTS OF PARCEL MAP 36-5 011-146-008-000 SFR 224.72 224.72 0.0 0.0 1.0 FR LOTS 8 9 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-011-000 COM 872.80 872.81 50.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 12 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-012-000 COM 872.80 872.81 50.0 0.16 0.0 L 13 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-013-000 COM 872.80 872.81 50.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 14 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-016-000 SFR 224.72 224.72 0.0 0.0 1.0 FR LOTS 8 9 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-017-000 SFR 224.72 224.72 0.0 0.0 1.0 POR LOTS 8 & 9 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN MOR A-38 011-146-024-000 COM 1,194.04 1,194.05 100.31 0.1943 0.0 L 10 & P L 11 BLK 2 MCRAE ADD 011-146-025-000 COM 705.82 705.82 39.64 0.13 0.0 POR L 11 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDITION 011-146-026-000 MFR 656.78 656.78 150.0 0.4814 0.0 PARCEL 2 MAIN STREET PLAZA APTS OF PARCEL MAP 36-5 011-147-002-000 COM 1,280.42 1,280.43 80.0 0.2296 0.0 FR LOTS 9 10 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-003-000 SFR 224.72 224.72 0.0 0.0 1.0 POR LOTS 8 & 9 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDITION MOR BK A PG 38 011-147-006-000 COM 1,228.90 1,228.92 50.0 0.241 0.0 FR LOT 7 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-007-000 COM 1,768.18 1,768.20 75.0 0.3444 0.0 LOTS 5 6 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-008-000 COM 740.88 740.89 40.0 0.1377 0.0 LOT 4 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-009-000 COM 1,942.16 1,942.17 110.0 0.357 0.0 LOTS 2 3 FR 1 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-010-000 COM 908.28 908.29 0.0 0.2066 0.0 LOT IN RSVL 011-147-011-000 COM 555.78 555.78 30.0 0.1033 0.0 FR LOT 1 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-012-000 SFR 224.72 224.72 0.0 0.0 1.0 POR LOTS 7 & 8 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDITION MOR BK A PG 38 011-147-014-000 COM 2,282.44 2,282.45 25.0 0.4999 0.0 FR L 8 THRU 11 BLK 1 MCRAE 012-121-001-000 COM 1,980.54 1,980.54 160.0 0.3272 0.0 FR LOTS 11 14 15 16 BLK 38 R 012-121-002-000 COM 1,165.84 1,165.84 140.0 0.1573 0.0 FR L 12 13 BLK 38 RSVL 012-121-003-000 COM 4,698.78 4,698.80 201.0 0.9139 0.0 LOTS BLK 38 RSVL 012-121-007-000 COM 624.42 624.43 81.15 0.0795 0.0 LOT 8 BLK 38 RSVLE 012-121-009-000 COM 519.34 519.34 50.0 0.0796 0.0 POR L 7 BLOCK 38 ROSEVILLE 012-121-011-000 EXE - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 1 113 MAIN ST O-70 012-121-012-000 COM 178.64 178.65 26.0 0.0206 0.0 UNIT 1 113 MAIN STREET CONDO 012-121-013-000 COM 141.78 141.80 22.0 0.0153 0.0 UNIT 2 113 MAIN STREET CONDO 012-121-014-000 COM 131.24 131.24 22.0 0.0129 0.0 UNIT 3 113 MAIN STREET CONDO 012-122-001-000 COM 3,158.74 3,158.75 150.0 0.6029 0.0 L 12 THRU 16 RSVLLE 012-122-003-000 COM 2,561.04 2,561.05 208.59 0.4218 0.0 L 5 BLK 21 ROSEVILLE 012-200-004-000 COM 339.78 339.79 31.0 0.0534 0.0 LOT 7 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-005-000 COM 339.78 339.79 31.0 0.0534 0.0 LOT 6 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-006-000 COM 339.78 339.79 31.0 0.0534 0.0 OWL CLUB FRNSHNGS/FXTRS LOT 5 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-007-000 COM 405.90 405.92 16.0 0.08 0.0 POR BANK CORNER SUBD 012-200-008-000 COM 485.28 485.28 55.0 0.068 0.0 L 3 4 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-009-000 COM 443.66 443.67 47.0 0.0647 0.0 LOTS 1 2 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-010-000 COM 993.32 993.32 53.0 0.1851 0.0 FR LOTS 9 10 11 12 BLK 22 RSVL 012-200-011-000 COM 1,348.08 1,348.10 107.5 0.2238 0.0 LOT 8 FR 7 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-012-000 COM 1,019.00 1,019.00 55.0 0.1894 0.0 FR LOTS 6 7 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-013-000 COM 740.88 740.89 40.0 0.1377 0.0 FR LOTS 5 6 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-026-000 COM 101.54 101.56 0.0 0.0231 0.0 FR L 12 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-027-000 COM 408.36 408.37 31.0 0.069 0.0 FR L 12 BLK 22 L 8 BANK C 012-200-030-000 COM 402.82 402.84 50.0 0.0531 0.0 POR LOT 13 BLK 22 ROSEVILLE 012-200-032-000 MFR 1,379.96 1,379.96 281.68 1.0374 0.0 1.32 AC PAR 1 PM 36-66 City of Roseville
Historic District Landscape and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 2

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
LAND

USE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
FRONT

FOOTAGE ACRES SF

UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Historic District Landscape and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 46
LEVIED PARCELS 45
CHARGE $42,194.00
MAXIMUM ASMT $42,194.40
FRONT FEET 2,999.87
ACRES 9.2908
SF UNITS 5
Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 2

1 RESOLUTION NO 24-129

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025, PURSUANT TO THE PROVIS IONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

The City Council o f the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions , formed the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District and annexed territory therein (hereafter referred to as the “District”) and annexed territory therein pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 o f the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referr ed to as the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance and services rel ating to landscaping, all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafte r referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE I NFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials and/or improvements for the landscape and lighting areas adjacent to property within the Pheasant Run, Cirby Oaks II and Reuter Ranch subdivisions, other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report .

The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

2 RESOLUTION NO. 24-129

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Rosev ille at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-130

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), and i nitiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance , operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to s eek the Annual Levy of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay the annual costs of the improvements.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any s ubstantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for the landscape and lighting areas , including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irri gation systems , drainage systems, other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report . The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improveme nts or subs tantial changes in existing improvements.

2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District and any annexations the reto. The D istrict includes the parcels within the areas known as the Pheasant Run, Cirby Oaks II and Reuter Ranch subdivisions. The District is known and designated as:

“Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District”

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the tim e and place of the Public Hearing by causing the publishing of this Resolution once in a local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as fe asible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.

3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-130

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ DAY OF ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-131

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE , CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of t he City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Rep ort”) for the district known and designated as the Infill Area Landscaping and Lig hting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Hig hways Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the ass essments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and,

WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the ass essments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within each Zone, as set forth in said Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DET ERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

2 Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:

a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the F iscal Year 2024/2025 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District

Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report.

3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-131

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, ___ ____________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held o n the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510

www.willdan.com

City of Roseville

Infill Area
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2024/25 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: May 15, 2024
Public Hearing: June 5, 2024

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:

Infill Area
Landscaping and Lighting District

City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California

Reference is hereby made to the Placer County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully sub mits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this _____ day of _________, 2024

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Roseville

By: ________________________________
Mickey Ashley
Senior Project Analyst
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Stacee Reynolds
Principal Consultant
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION ..................................... 2 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ......................................... 2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT ............................. 3 E. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND BENEFITS .......................... 4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .................................................................. 6 A. GENERAL ................................................................................................ 6 B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS ................................................................ 6 C. RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ......................................... 8 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ...................................................................................... 9 A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET ............................................................................... 9 B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES ..................................................... 10 C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION ..................................... 10 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ................................................... 10 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ....... 15 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAPS .................................................... 16 APPENDIX B — FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT ROLL ............................................. 20 DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION

The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the City’s existing Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed and levie s annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”).

The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District, any new annexations, changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 (hereafter “Fiscal Year” or “FY 2024/25”). The special benefit assessments are based on historical and estimated costs to maintain the District improvements. These assessments, which provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District, will provide funding for the operation and maintenance of District improvements.

The District consists of three (3) zones of benefit, Zones A, B and C (individually the “Zone” and collectively the “Zones”). The improvements that benefit properties within each Zone and the costs to maintain and service those improvements are identified and budgeted separately by Zone. The total cost of landscape maintenance within a Zone is equitably spread among only the benefiting parcels.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the County of Placer (“County”) Assessor. The County Auditor -Controller (“Auditor-Controller”) uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific tax code accounts, to identify on the County’s tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.

Following approval of the Report, the Roseville City Council (the “City Council”) will by resolution, order the improvements to be made, if any, and confirm the levy and collection of assessments pursuant to the Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report, as approved, or modified by the City Council, define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District and respective Zones for FY 2024/25. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor-Controller to be included on the FY 2024/25 property tax roll for each parcel.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current Fiscal Year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the Auditor-Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rates approved by the City Council.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the Act and are in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID (“Articles XIIIC and XIIID”) and the provisions of the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act [Government Code Section 53750 and following] (the “Implementation Act”). Articles XIIIC and XIIID and the Implementation Act collectively are hereinafter referred to as “Proposition 218”.

Pursuant to the California Constitution Article XIIID Section 5, certain existing assessments are exempt from the substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID Section 4 and property owner balloting for the assessments is not required until such time that the assessments are increased. Specifically, the City determined that all improvements and the annual assessments originally established for the District were part of the conditions of property development and approved by the original property o wner (developer). As such, pursuant to Article XIIID Section 5(b), all the property owners approved the existing District assessments at the time the assessments were created (originally imposed pursuant to a 100% landowner petition). Therefore, the pre -existing assessment amounts (the maximum assessment rates of Zones A, B, & C identified in this Report) are exempt from the procedural requi rements Article XIIID Section 4, provided the assessments are not increased above these previously approved maximum assessment rates.

The District and all Zones therein have been formed pursuant to the Act. Pursuant to the Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Report prior to approving the annual assessm ents to be levied on the County tax rolls. The assessments described in this Report have been prepared in accordance with the Act.

C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The three Zones within the District are comprised of three non -contiguous residential subdivisions, namely Pheasant Run, Cirby Oaks II and Reuter Ranch, are located in the southern portion of the City and are within the boundaries of the City’s “Infill Planning Area .” A general depiction of the boundaries of each Zone can be found in Appendix A of this Report.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3

D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT

As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the Report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Furthermore, the 1972 Act specifies that where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the governing body may choose to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any available and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

E. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND BENEFITS

This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the maintenance and operation of certain landscaping improvements located within the public rights- of-way and dedicated easements:

The District provides all services necessary to maintain the landscaped corridors adjacent to the privately-owned parcels comprising the three subdivisions.

Improvements include shrubs, trees, and other landscaping vegetation, as well as irrigation controllers, automatic valves, and irrigation systems. Services provided include all necessary services, operations, and maintenance required in keeping the improvements in a healthy, vigorous condition and in proper working order.

The District encompasses three subdivisions, each of which is located in a separate Zone. The Zones have specific improvements and costs associated with those improvements that benefit the parcels within each respective Zone. The total cost of landscape maintenance within a Zone is equitably spread among only the benefiting parcels within the Zone and only parcels that receive a Special Benefit from the improvements are assessed.

The specific locations of the improvements within each Zone of the District are described as follows:

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 Zone A – Pheasant Run

Maintenance of 6,880 square feet of landscaping and related improvements within the Pheasant Run subdivision.

Zone B – Cirby Oaks

Maintenance of 7,447 square feet of landscaping and related improvements within the Cirby Oaks II subdivision.

Zone C – Reuter Ranch

Maintenance of 24,700 square feet of landscaping and related improvements within the Reuter Ranch subdivision. A larger amount of landscaping benefits the properties within Reuter Ranch and typically results in a larger per parcel assessment for these properties as compared to Zones A and B.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

A. GENERAL
The Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities.

The Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:

“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”

The formula used for calculating assessments in each Zone of the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel.

B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a Special Benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service;”
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special Benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over, and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large .

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “Special Benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional Special Benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a Special Benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate Special Benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional Special Benefit conferred on that parcel.” These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District. The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the District as well as provide for the annual maintenance of those improvements, and the assessment revenues generated by District will be used solely for such purposes.

Each of the proposed improvements; the associated costs and assessments have been reviewed, identified, and allocated based on Special Benefit pursuant to the Act. All improvements associated with the Zones were necessary and required through the conditions of property development. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the improvements are of direct and Special Benefit to the properties.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed parcel within each Zone receives a Special Benefit from the improvements. The desirability and security of properties is enhanced by well - maintained landscaping in close proximity to those properties.

The special benefits associated with all landscaping improvements are specifically:

• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements.
• Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the Zones resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well -maintained green belts and landscaped areas.
• Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the Zones through well -maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti. • Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 All of the preceding special benefits allowed the property to be developed for the enjoyment of the property owners and contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the Zones.

The improvements are for Special Benefit, enhancement, and use of properties within the Zones. Although the improvements include public easements, rights-of- way, streets, and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the construction and installation of these improvements are only necessary for the development of properties within the Zones and are not required nor necessarily desired by any properties o r developments outside the Zone’s boundaries.

Therefore, any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental and there is n o measurable general benefit to properties outside the Zones or to the public at large.

C. RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Pursuant to the Act, the costs of each Zone of the District must be spread to each parcel based upon a benefit formula. Each assessable parcel in the District receives a direct and Special Benefit from the improvements in the Zone. This direct and Special Benefit was determined to be equal for all dwelling units within each Zone; costs for each Zone shall be calculated separately within each respective Zone. Each single -family residence is equal to one dwelling unit (unit) and the formula used to arrive at each parcel’s annual assessment is described below. Public parcels lying within the landscape corridors are considered to receive no benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.

Costs associated with each Zone are to be charged only to assessable parcels within the respective Zone as follows:

Balance to Levy in Zone = Assessment Per Unit in Zone Total Units in Zone

The Maximum Annual Assessment Rates are not to exceed $193.32 per unit for Zone A and $200.00 per unit for Zones B and C.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET

Fund balance information for each Zone is reported in Section C on the following page.

Total balance to levy for the District is $24,794.92.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES

C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS

Contract Maintenance - Landscaping - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping corridors, street medians, entryways, irrigation, and related drainage systems as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Repair & Maintenance – Landscaping - This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures – Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserve Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year that were previously funded or accumulated in the Rehabilitation Reserve. The Rehabilitation Reserve is used to accumulate funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation or repla cement of District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

ADMINISTRATION COSTS

City Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City’s Finance Department and other Departments in preparing the annual budget for the Report, together with other financial information required to determine the annual assessment. These costs would also include the preparation, posting and publishing of public notices required for City Council action relating to the District, as well as costs to perform legal review of documents.

County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out-of-pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

Contribution for / (Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, thi s line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

BALANCE TO LEVY - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current Fiscal Year for each Zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the total District costs together with any applicable adjustments to the budget as described above.

ASSESSMENT RATES:

Number of Assessable Units - The total number of residential units that are expected to be assessed. Non -assessable lots or parcels include government - owned land, public utility -owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District currently do not benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.

Applied Assessment Rate per Unit - The per unit assessment rates to be applied to the non-exempt parcels within the District for the current Fiscal Year.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13

Maximum Assessment Rate per Unit - The per unit maximum assessment rates for the current Fiscal Year.

Potential Maximum Assessment Per Zone – The total amount that can be assessed against all parcels within each Zone for the current Fiscal Year based upon the expected number of units to be assessed.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

OPERATING RESERVE

Beginning Operating Reserve Balance 7 -1-2024 (est.) - The anticipated beginning balance of cash and receivables net of any unpaid prior year obligations for each Zone. These beginning balances shall be used to fund each Zone’s expenditures from July 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024, as the Operating Reserve is required to compensate for the approximate six -month delay between the start of the District’s Fiscal Year and the receipt of the collections from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve money to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same Zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Operating Reserve Balance 6 -30-2025 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reserve balance/(deficit) for each Zone as of June 30, 2025. The size of each Zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance, service and incidental expenses from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the Agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each Zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six -months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are r eceived from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

REHABILITATION RESERVE

Collect from FY 2024/25 Levy — This amount is added to the FY 2024/25 levy to accumulate funding for future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2024/25 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve money expected to be transferred out of the Rehabilitation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements in FY 2024/25. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve moneys to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same Zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Rehab Reserve Balance 6 -30-2025 (est.) - The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of June 30, 2025. These funds shall be used to provide for future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements which cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

The Report provides a five -year Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) which shows projected expenditures by Zone related to the rehabilitation, restoration and/or replacement of District improvements, and other allowable costs. The Current Fiscal Year CIP is shown in the preceding Budget Section A. The projected CIP costs for the remaining four years are shown in the table below.

Zone A

Zone B

Zone C

Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same Zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAPS

The Assessment Diagrams for the District have previously been submitted to the City Clerk in the format required under the Act and are, by reference, made part of this Report. The boundary maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a rendering of the District and Zone Boundaries are presented herein.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20 APPENDIX B — FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT ROLL

Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

A listing of parcels to be assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, may be submitted to the City Clerk, under a separate cover, and by reference is made part of this Report.

These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempt from assessment.

At the conclusion of the public hearing for the District and the proposed assessments, approval of the Report (as submitted or as modified) confirms the method of apportionment and the assessment rate to be levied against each eligible parcel and thereby constitutes the approved levy and collection of assessments for FY 2024/25. The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2024/25 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current Fiscal Year , a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
NO OF

UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
469-370-001-000 A 193.32$ 193.32$ 1.0 LOT 1 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-002-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 2 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-003-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 3 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-004-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 4 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-005-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 5 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-006-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 6 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-007-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 7 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-008-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 8 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-009-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 9 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-010-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 10 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-011-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 11 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-012-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 12 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-013-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 13 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-014-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 14 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-015-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 15 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-016-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 16 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-017-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 17 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-018-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 18 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-019-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 19 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-020-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 20 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-021-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 21 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-022-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 22 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-023-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 23 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-024-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 24 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-025-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 25 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-026-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 26 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-027-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 27 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-028-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 28 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-029-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 29 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-030-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 30 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-031-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 31 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-032-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 32 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-033-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 33 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-034-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 34 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-035-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 35 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-036-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 36 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-037-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 37 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-038-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 38 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-039-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 39 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 469-370-040-000 A 193.32 193.32 1.0 LOT 40 PHEASANT RUN MOR T-20 471-150-018-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 34 REUTER RANCH PH 1 471-150-019-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 35 REUTER RANCH PH 1 471-150-020-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 36 REUTER RANCH PH 1 471-150-021-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 41 REUTER RANCH PH 1 471-320-001-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 1 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-002-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 2 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-003-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 3 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-004-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 4 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-005-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 5 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-006-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 6 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-007-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 7 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-008-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 8 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-009-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 9 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-010-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 10 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-011-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 11 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-012-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 12 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-013-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 13 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-014-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 14 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-015-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 15 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-016-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 16 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-017-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 17 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-018-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 18 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-019-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 19 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-020-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 20 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-021-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 21 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-022-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 22 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-023-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 23 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-024-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 24 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-025-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 25 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-026-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 26 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 City of Roseville
Infill Area Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 4

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
NO OF

UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Infill Area Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
471-320-027-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 27 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-320-028-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 28 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-029-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 29 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-030-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 30 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-031-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 31 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-032-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 32 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 MOR BK U PG 68 471-320-033-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 33 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 2 U-68 471-330-001-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 37 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-002-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 38 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-003-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 39 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-004-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 40 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-005-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 42 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-006-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 43 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-007-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 44 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-008-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 45 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-009-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 46 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-010-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 47 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-011-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 48 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-012-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 49 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-013-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 50 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-014-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 51 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-015-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 52 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-016-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 53 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-017-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 54 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR BK V PG 66 471-330-018-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 55 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-019-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 56 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-020-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 57 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-021-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 58 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-022-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 59 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR BK V PG 66 471-330-023-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 60 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-024-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 61 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-025-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 62 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR BK V PG 66 471-330-026-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 63 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-027-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 64 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR BK V PG 66 471-330-028-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 65 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR V-66 471-330-029-000 C 195.42 200.00 1.0 LOT 66 REUTER RANCH UNIT 1 PH 3 MOR BK V PG 66 472-420-001-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 1 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-002-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 2 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-003-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 3 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-004-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 4 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-005-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 5 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-006-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 6 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-007-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 7 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-008-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 8 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-009-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 9 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-010-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 10 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-011-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 11 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-012-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 12 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-013-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 13 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-014-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 14 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-015-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 15 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-016-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 16 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-017-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 34 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-018-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 35 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-019-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 36 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-020-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 37 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-021-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 38 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-022-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 39 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-023-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 40 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-024-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 41 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-025-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 42 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-026-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 43 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-027-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 44 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-028-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 45 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-029-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 46 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-030-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 47 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-031-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 48 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-032-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 49 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-033-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 50 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-034-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 51 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 4

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
NO OF

UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Infill Area Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
472-420-035-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 52 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-036-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 53 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-037-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 54 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-038-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 101 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-039-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 102 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-040-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 103 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-041-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 104 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-042-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 105 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-043-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 106 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-044-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 107 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-045-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 108 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-046-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 109 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-047-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 110 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-048-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 111 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-049-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 112 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-050-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 113 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-051-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 114 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-052-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 115 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-420-053-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 116 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-001-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 17 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-002-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 18 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-003-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 19 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-004-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 20 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-005-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 21 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-006-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 22 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-007-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 23 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-008-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 24 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-009-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 25 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-010-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 26 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-011-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 27 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-012-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 28 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-013-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 29 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-014-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 30 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-015-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 31 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-016-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 32 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-017-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 33 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-018-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 55 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-019-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 56 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-020-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 57 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-021-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 58 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-022-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 59 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-023-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 60 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-024-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 61 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-025-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 62 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-026-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 63 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-027-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 64 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-028-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 65 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-029-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 66 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-030-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 67 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-031-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 68 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-032-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 69 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-033-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 70 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-034-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 71 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-035-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 72 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-036-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 73 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-037-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 74 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-038-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 75 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-039-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 76 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-040-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 77 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-041-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 78 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-042-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 79 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-043-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 80 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-044-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 81 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-045-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 82 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-046-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 83 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-047-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 84 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-048-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 85 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-049-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 86 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-050-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 87 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-051-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 88 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 Willdan Financial Services Page 3 of 4

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM
ASMT
NO OF

UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Infill Area Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
472-430-052-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 89 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-053-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 90 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-054-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 91 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-055-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 92 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-056-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 93 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-057-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 94 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-058-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 95 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-059-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 96 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-060-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 97 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-061-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 98 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-062-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 99 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 472-430-063-000 B 35.90 200.00 1.0 LOT 100 CIRBY OAKS II T-57 Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 222
LEVIED PARCELS 222
CHARGE $24,794.92
MAXIMUM ASMT $44,132.80
NO OF UNITS 222
Willdan Financial Services Page 4 of 4
1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-132

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ENGINEER’S LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE JOHNSON RANCH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025, PURSUANT TO THE PROV ISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutio ns, formed the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District and annexed territory therein (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, be ginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscapi ng, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, T HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE D, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE JOHNSON RANCH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk t he Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operati on of and the furnishing of services, materials and/or improvements for landscape, lighting, open space, floodway, stream course and wetland areas, other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant fa cilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report . The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

2 RESOLUTION NO. 24-132

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _____________________ __________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do her eby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on th e __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-133

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE JOHNSON RANCH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “Distri ct”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance , operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREF ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE JOHNSON RANCH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its int ention to seek the Annual Levy of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay the annual costs of the improvements.

Section 2 Proposed improvement s and a ny substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for landscape, lighting, open space, floodway , stream course and wetland areas, including certain mitigation monitoring activities therein, turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems and drainage systems, bike trails , other public improvements within the street right of way areas and all appurtenant facilities related th ereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report . The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District and any annexations thereto . The District generally includes the parcels within the area known as the Southeast Roseville Specific Plan. The District is known and designated as

“Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District”

Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment est ablished for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and applicable annual inflat ionary adjustment previously authorized by City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing the publishing of this Resolution once in a local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-133

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Rosevil le, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-134

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ,

CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

FOR THE JOHNSON RANCH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of the City o f Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Report”) for the distri ct known and designated as the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District (he reafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and to pr epare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Eng ineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and,

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and,

WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is pr eliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, op eration, maintenance and services to be performed within each Zone, as set forth in said Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE JOHNSON RANCH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:

2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remai n open to public inspection.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510

www.willdan.com

City of Roseville

Johnson Ranch
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2024/25 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: May 15, 2024
Public Hearing: June 5, 2024

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:

Johnson Ranch
Landscaping and Lighting District

City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California

Dated this _____ day of _________, 2024

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Roseville

By: ________________________________
Mickey Ashley
Senior Project Analyst
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Stacee Reynolds
Principal Consultant
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION .................................... 2 C. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ........................................................................ 3 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT ............................. 3 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND BENEFITS ................. 4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ................................................................. 6 A. GENERAL ................................................................................................ 6 B. PROPOSITION 218 BENEFIT ANALYSIS ............................................... 6 C. DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ............................ 7 D. INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR .............................................. 7 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ...................................................................................... 8 A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET ............................................................................... 8 B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES ....................................................... 9 C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION ....................................... 9 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ................................................... 10 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ....... 15 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ....................................................... 16 APPENDIX B — FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT ROLL .............................................. 18 DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements in the southeast section of the City of Roseville, known as Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed and is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “1972 Act”).

The District consists of five (5) zones of benefit, Zones A, B, C, D and E (individually the “Zone” and collectively the “Zones”). The improvements that benefit properties within each Zone and the costs to maintain and service those improvements are identified and budgeted separately by Zone . The total cost of landscape maintenance within a Zone is equitably spread among only the benefiting parcels.

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will, by resolution, order the improvements to be made, if any, and confirm the levy and collection of assessments pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District and respective Zones for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2024/25. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Co ntroller to be included on the FY 2024/25 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rates approved by the City Council.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID (“Articles XIIIC and XIIID”) and the provisions of the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act [Government Code Sect ion 53750 and following] (the “Implementation Act”). Articles XIIIC and XIIID and the Implementation Act collectively are hereinafter referred to as “Proposition 218”.

Pursuant to the California Constitution Article XIIID , Section 5, certain existing assessments are exempt from the substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID Section 4 and property owner balloting for the assessments is not required until such time that the assessments are increased. Specifically, the City determined that all improvements and the annual assessments originally established for the District were part of the conditions of property development and approved by the original property owner (developer). As such, pursuant to Article XIIID Section 5(b), all the property owners approved the existing District assessments at the time the assessments were created (originally imposed pursuant to a 100% landowner petition). Therefore, the pre -existing assessment amounts (the maximum assessment rates of Zones A, B, C & D identified in this Report) are exempt from the procedural requirem ents of Article XIIID Section 4, provided the assessments are not increased above these previously approved maximum assessment rates.

In Fiscal Year 1999 /00, the City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with Article XIIID for Zone E in order to increase the assessment to cover additional costs for services . The proposed assessment increase presented to property owners included an annual inflationary factor of 3%. In Fiscal Year 1999/00 the maximum assessment rate was $623.10 per acre.

At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, all property owner ballots returned were tabulated and the City determined that a majority protest did not exist. The City Council then approved the increased assessment and the inflationary factor for maintaining the improvements within the District.

The District and all Zones therein have been formed pursuant to the 1972 Act.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 C. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The District lies within a portion of the Southeast Roseville Specific Plan, which is located in the southeast section of the City of Roseville . The District is generally located east of I-80 on the south side of Douglas Boulevard. See Appendix A for a rendering of the District boundary map.

D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND BENEFITS
Zones A, B and C

Zones A, B and C of the District, by special benefit assessments, provide annual funding for the continual maintenance of certain landscaping, open space areas; including floodway and stream course areas as well as any the maintenance of bike trails. The specific locations of the floodways, stream courses and areas adjacent thereto to be maintained are described below:
• Parcel 70 - Floodway that feeds Cirby Creek and is located between Douglas Boulevard and Eureka Road. (7.76 acres) - Zone C • Parcel 71 - Strap Ravine floodway between Douglas Boulevard and East Roseville Parkway. (3.38 acres) - Zone A
• Parcel 72 - Floodway between Roseville Parkway east to commercial development. (8.98 acres) - Zone C
• Parcel 73 - Recreational floodway in Strap Ravine between East Roseville Parkway and Sierra College Boulevard. (16.11 acres) - Zone A • Parcels 74 & 75 - Recreational floodway that eventually feeds Linda Creek, beginning at Sierra College Boulevard then east to the Roseville City limits. (6.2 acres and 10.8 acres, respectively) - Zone B
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5

Zone D

Zone D of the District, by special benefit assessments, provides annual funding for the costs of mitigation monitoring and costs to maintain landscaped open space areas within certain wetland / riparian area(s) to comply with a Section 404 Permit.

The issuance of this Section 404 permit was a condition of the development of the Johnson Ranch East Project, which represents the parcels comprising Zone D.

Zone E

Zone E of the District, by special benefit assessments, provides annual funding for the maintenance of certain landscaping, bike trails and open space areas that include floodway and stream course areas and the costs of mitigation monitoring to comply with both a Section 404 Permit (Federal) and a 1603 Permit (State). The issuance of these permits was a condition of the development of Parcel 9. The specific locations of the floodway and stream courses to be maintained are described as:
• Parcel 76 - Streambed and floodway area located at Cirby Creek from the southwest side of Eureka Boulevard to the end of the Coker Development. (2.79 acres)

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL
The Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities.

The Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:

B. PROPOSITION 218 BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments regarding Zone E, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property -related service;”
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large .

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be dete rmined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) set forth in the Report is based on the premise that each assessed property receives special benefits from the improvements within the District, and the assessment obligation for each parcel reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefits as compared to other properties that receive special benefits.

C. DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Pursuant to the Act, the costs of the District must be spread to each parcel based upon a benefit formula. Each assessable parcel in the District receives a direct and special benefit from the improvements in the District. The formula used to arrive at each parcel’s annual levy amount in each zone is as follows:

Zones A and B

Thirty percent (30%) of the total budgeted costs of Zones A & B are to be levied to floodway Parcel 82 (APN 458-020-001). The remaining Seventy percent (70%) of costs are then allocated equally on a per acre basis to all assessable parcels within these Zones . Acreage of common area parcels shall be apportioned to the remaining assessable parcels of a subdivision and/or parcel split(s) related to the creation of the common area parcel(s).

Zones C, D and E

The budgeted costs of Zones C, D and E are to be allocated equally on a per acre basis to all assessable parcels within each respective Zone. Acreage of common area parcels shall be apportioned to the remaining assessable parcels of a subdivision and/or parcel split(s) related to the creation of the common area parcel(s).

D. INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
For Zone E only, if the proposed assessment rate increases over the prior fiscal year’s maximum assessment rate by a percentage no greater than the 3%, then the proposed assessment rate is not considered an increase.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8

III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET

Fund balance information of each Zone is reported in Section C on the following page.

The total balance to levy for the district is $49,087.04.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES

C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS

Contract Maintenance - Open Space – Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition of all open space landscaping, irrigation, drainage systems, lighting, floodplain improvements and appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

Mitigation Monitoring – Costs associated with monitoring certain impacts to riparian areas in or near the District under the terms of a Section 404 or 1603 permit. If zero, this line item will not be shown in the budget.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements. If zero, this line item will not be shown in the budget.

Maintenance - Bike Trails - Costs associated with the resurfacing of the Bike trail.

If zero, this line item will not be shown in the budget.

Water Hyacinth Eradication – Costs associated with the eradication of the Water Hyacinth plant in the creek beds. If zero, this line item will not be shown in the budget.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11

ADMINISTRATION COSTS

Contract Administration – Park’s Dept – Estimated costs of Park and Recreation Department staff to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and overall repair and maintenance of the District. This amount also includes the cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.

Contract Administration – Open Space – Estimated costs of City staff to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and non-contract maintenance of the open space areas of the District. This amount also includes the cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items.

County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out-of-pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 Contribution for / (Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

BALANCE TO LEVY - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current fiscal year for each Zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the total District costs together with applicable adjustments related to the Reserve Fund replenishments or reductions and/or Capital Improvement Fund activity.

Parcel 82 Levy Recap – A recap of the cost breakdown between certain parcels.

Thirty percent (30%) of the total budgeted costs of Zones A & B are to be levied to floodway Parcel 82 (APN 458 -020-001). 70% of costs are to be assessed to the remaining parcels.

ASSESSMENT RATES:

Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels within each Unit that are expected to be assessed. Non -assessable lots or parcels include government-owned land, public utility -owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District that currently do not benefit from the improvements due possibly to development restrictions.

Total Assessable Acres – Non-Parcel 82 Properties - The total number of acres within Zones A and B that are to be assessed on an acreage basis for the current fiscal year; this acreage excludes Parcel 82.

Applied Assessment Rates - The assessment rates to be applied to the non - exempt parcels within the District for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Assessment Rates - The maximum assessment rates for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Potential Assessment – The total amount that is expected to be assessed against all parcels within the District for the Current Fiscal Year.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

OPERATING RESERVE

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 Ending Operating Reserve Balance 6 -30-2025 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reserve balance/(deficit) for each Zone as of June 30, 2025. The size of each Zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance, service, and incidental expenses from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the Agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each Zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six -months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are received from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

REHABILITATION RESERVE

Collect from FY 2024/25 Levy — This amount is added to the FY 2024/25 levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2024/25 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies expected to be transferred out of the Rehabilitation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly , any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same Zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department, in order to provide for the maintenance an d operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the District or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same Zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP

The Assessment Diagrams for the District have previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the Act and are, by reference, made part of this Report. The boundary maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a one -page rendering of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 APPENDIX B — FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT ROLL

Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and other property that cannot be developed, excepting common area parcels. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempt from assessment.

The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2024/25 property tax roll for each parcel.

The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
048-160-030-000 Assessable A&C 7,089.04$ 7,089.05$ 38.66 0.0 38.66 0.0 0.0 38.7AL29JOHNSONRANCH N CENP100 048-160-032-000 Assessable A 499.84 499.85 4.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3ACL32JOHNSONRANCH N CENP100 048-160-036-000 Assessable A 1,365.64 1,365.65 11.83 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0AC POR L1 JOHNSON RANCH #3 048-160-040-000 Assessable C 178.64 178.65 0.0 0.0 2.63 0.0 0.0 2.6 AC L30C JOHNSON RANCH N C 048-160-041-000 Assessable C 76.08 76.08 0.0 0.0 1.12 0.0 0.0 1.1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 26-126 048-160-042-000 Assessable C 76.08 76.08 0.0 0.0 1.12 0.0 0.0 1.1 AC PAR 2 PMOR 26-126 048-160-043-000 Assessable C 506.06 506.07 0.0 0.0 7.45 0.0 0.0 7.5 AC PAR 3 PMOR 26-126 048-160-045-000 Assessable C 170.50 170.50 0.0 0.0 2.51 0.0 0.0 2.5 AC PAR 2 PMOR 28-26 048-160-046-000 Assessable C 211.72 211.74 0.0 0.0 3.117 0.0 0.0 PARCEL 1 PMOR 29-10 048-160-047-000 Assessable C 315.00 315.02 0.0 0.0 4.6374 0.0 0.0 PARCEL 2 PMOR 29-10 048-160-048-000 Assessable C 356.32 356.33 0.0 0.0 5.2456 0.0 0.0 PARCEL 3 PMOR 29-10 048-160-049-000 Common Area C - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 AC PARCEL 4 PMOR 29-10 048-171-045-000 Assessable C 739.06 739.07 0.0 0.0 10.88 0.0 0.0 10.9 AC L 21 SOUTHFORK Q-14 048-171-053-000 Assessable A&C 3,509.68 3,509.69 19.14 0.0 19.14 0.0 0.0 19.6 AC LOT 8A & POR LOT 8B SOUTHFORK Q-14 457-070-001-000 Assessable E 2,430.54 3,750.43 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8747 2.7 AC PAR 9A PMOR 28-110 457-070-002-000 Assessable E 3,150.72 4,861.71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7265 3.5 AC PAR 9B PMOR 28-110 457-070-003-000 Assessable E 2,970.64 4,583.83 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5135 3.3 AC PAR 9C PMOR 28-110 457-070-004-000 Assessable E 2,970.64 4,583.83 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5135 3.3 AC PAR 9D PMOR 28-110 458-010-001-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 1 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-002-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 2 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-003-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 3 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-004-000 Assessable A 26.74 26.75 0.2317 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 4 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-005-000 Assessable A 39.44 39.45 0.3417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 5 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-010-006-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 6 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-010-007-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 7 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-008-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 8 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-009-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 9 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-010-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 10 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-010-011-000 Assessable A 35.98 35.98 0.3117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 11 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-012-000 Assessable A 27.90 27.90 0.2417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 12 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-010-013-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 13 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-010-014-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 14 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-015-000 Assessable A 32.50 32.52 0.2817 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 15 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-016-000 Assessable A 30.20 30.21 0.2617 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 16 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-017-000 Assessable A 31.36 31.37 0.2717 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 17 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-018-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 18 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-019-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 19 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR Q-11 458-010-020-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 20 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-021-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 21 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-022-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 22 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR Q-11 458-010-023-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 23 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-024-000 Assessable A 26.74 26.75 0.2317 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 24 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR Q-11 458-010-025-000 Assessable A 30.20 30.21 0.2617 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 25 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-026-000 Assessable A 30.20 30.21 0.2617 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 45 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-010-027-000 Assessable A 30.20 30.21 0.2617 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 46 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-028-000 Assessable A 16.34 16.36 0.1417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 47 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-010-029-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 48 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
458-010-030-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 49 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-033-000 Assessable A 27.90 27.90 0.2417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 52 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-010-035-000 Assessable A 27.90 27.90 0.2417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POR L 50 BROADSTONE PL Q-11 458-010-036-000 Assessable A 26.74 26.75 0.2317 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L51 &POR L50 BROADSTONE PLQ-11 458-020-001-000 Flood A&B 8,493.70 8,493.71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 71C BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-002-000 Assessable A 35.98 35.98 0.3117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 26 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-003-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 27 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-004-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 28 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-005-000 Assessable A 38.28 38.29 0.3317 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 29 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-006-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 30 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR Q-11 458-020-007-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 31 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-008-000 Assessable A 39.44 39.45 0.3417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 32 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-009-000 Assessable A 39.44 39.45 0.3417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 33 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-010-000 Assessable A 29.04 29.06 0.2517 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 34 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-011-000 Assessable A 31.36 31.37 0.2717 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 35 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-012-000 Assessable A 25.58 25.59 0.2217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 36 BROADSTONE PLACE MOR BK Q PG 11 458-020-013-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 37 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-014-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 38 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-015-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 39 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-016-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 40 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-017-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 41 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-018-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 42 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-019-000 Assessable A 23.28 23.28 0.2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 43 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-020-020-000 Assessable A 24.42 24.44 0.2117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 44 BROADSTONE PLACE Q-11 458-030-001-000 Assessable C 296.16 296.17 0.0 0.0 4.36 0.0 0.0 4.3 AC PAR 7E PM 25-91 458-030-004-000 Assessable C 21.04 21.06 0.0 0.0 0.31 0.0 0.0 PAR 3 PMOR 28-15 458-030-005-000 Assessable C 17.66 17.66 0.0 0.0 0.26 0.0 0.0 PAR 4 PMOR 28-15 458-030-006-000 Assessable C 37.36 37.36 0.0 0.0 0.55 0.0 0.0 PAR 5 PMOR 28-15 458-030-009-000 Assessable C 31.92 31.93 0.0 0.0 0.47 0.0 0.0 PAR 8 PMOR 28-15 458-030-010-000 Assessable C 45.50 45.51 0.0 0.0 0.67 0.0 0.0 PAR 6 & 7 PMOR 28-15 458-030-014-000 Assessable C 40.06 40.08 0.0 0.0 0.59 0.0 0.0 LOT A PMOR 28-71 458-030-015-000 Assessable C 28.52 28.53 0.0 0.0 0.42 0.0 0.0 LOT B PMOR 28-71 458-030-016-000 Assessable C 84.90 84.91 0.0 0.0 1.25 0.0 0.0 1.3 AC PAR 1 & POR PAR 2 PMOR 28-15 458-030-017-000 Assessable C 34.38 34.39 0.0 0.0 0.5062 0.0 0.0 PAR 7H PMOR 28-119 458-030-018-000 Assessable C 16.64 16.66 0.0 0.0 0.2452 0.0 0.0 PAR 1 PMOR 28-120 458-030-019-000 Assessable C 21.68 21.69 0.0 0.0 0.3193 0.0 0.0 PAR 2 PMOR 28-120 458-030-020-000 Assessable C 26.00 26.00 0.0 0.0 0.3828 0.0 0.0 PAR 3 PMOR 28-120 458-030-021-000 Assessable C 25.48 25.48 0.0 0.0 0.3751 0.0 0.0 PAR 4 PMOR 28-120 458-030-022-000 Assessable C 16.62 16.64 0.0 0.0 0.2449 0.0 0.0 PAR 5 PMOR 28-120 458-030-026-000 Assessable C 34.86 34.86 0.0 0.0 0.5132 0.0 0.0 PAR 6 & 7 PMOR 28-120 458-040-001-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 1 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-002-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 2 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-003-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 3 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-004-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 4 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-005-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 5 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-006-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 6 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-007-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 7 THE VILLAGE S-101 Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
458-040-008-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 8 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-009-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 9 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-010-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 10 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-011-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 11 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-012-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 12 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-013-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 13 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-014-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 14 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-015-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 15 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-016-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 16 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-017-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 17 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-018-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 18 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-019-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 19 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-020-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 20 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-021-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 21 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-022-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 22 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-023-000 Assessable A&C 34.84 34.84 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.0 LOT 23 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-024-000 Assessable A&C 38.50 38.51 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.0 LOT 24 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-025-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 25 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-026-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 26 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-027-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 27 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-028-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 28 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-029-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 29 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-030-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 30 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-031-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 31 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-032-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 32 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-033-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 33 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-034-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 34 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-035-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 35 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-036-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 36 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-037-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 37 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-038-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 38 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-039-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 39 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-040-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 40 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-041-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 41 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-042-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 42 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-043-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 55 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-044-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 56 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-045-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 57 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-046-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 58 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-047-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 59 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-048-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 60 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-049-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 61 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-050-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 62 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-051-000 Assessable A&C 27.50 27.51 0.15 0.0 0.15 0.0 0.0 LOT 63 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-052-000 Assessable A&C 38.50 38.51 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.0 LOT 64 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-053-000 Assessable A&C 25.66 25.67 0.14 0.0 0.14 0.0 0.0 LOT 65 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-054-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 66 THE VILLAGE S-101 Willdan Financial Services Page 3 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
458-040-055-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 67 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-056-000 Assessable A&C 27.50 27.51 0.15 0.0 0.15 0.0 0.0 LOT 68 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-057-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 69 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-058-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 70 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-059-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 71 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-060-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 72 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-061-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 73 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-062-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 74 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-063-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 75 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-064-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 76 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-065-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 77 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-066-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 78 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-040-067-000 Assessable A&C 25.66 25.67 0.14 0.0 0.14 0.0 0.0 LOT 79 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-001-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 43 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-002-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 44 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-003-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 45 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-004-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 46 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-005-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 47 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-006-000 Assessable A&C 25.66 25.67 0.14 0.0 0.14 0.0 0.0 LOT 48 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-007-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 49 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-008-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 50 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-009-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 51 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-010-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 52 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-011-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 53 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-012-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 54 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-013-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 80 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-014-000 Assessable A&C 27.50 27.51 0.15 0.0 0.15 0.0 0.0 LOT 81 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-015-000 Assessable A&C 33.00 33.01 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.0 LOT 82 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-016-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 83 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-017-000 Assessable A&C 25.66 25.67 0.14 0.0 0.14 0.0 0.0 LOT 84 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-018-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 85 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-019-000 Assessable A&C 31.16 31.17 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.0 LOT 86 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-020-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 87 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-021-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 88 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-022-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 89 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-023-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 90 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-024-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 91 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-025-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 92 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-026-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 93 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-027-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 94 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-028-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 95 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-029-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 96 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-030-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 97 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-031-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 98 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-032-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 99 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-033-000 Assessable A&C 33.00 33.01 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.0 LOT 100 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-034-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 101 THE VILLAGE S-101 Willdan Financial Services Page 4 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
458-050-035-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 102 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-036-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 103 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-037-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 104 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-038-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 105 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-039-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 106 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-040-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 107 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-041-000 Assessable A&C 31.16 31.17 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.0 LOT 108 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-042-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 109 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-043-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 110 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-044-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 111 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-045-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 112 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-046-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 113 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-047-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 114 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-048-000 Assessable A&C 38.50 38.51 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.0 LOT 115 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-049-000 Assessable A&C 51.34 51.34 0.28 0.0 0.28 0.0 0.0 LOT 116 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-050-000 Assessable A&C 31.16 31.17 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.0 LOT 117 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-051-000 Assessable A&C 27.50 27.51 0.15 0.0 0.15 0.0 0.0 LOT 118 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-052-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 119 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-053-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 120 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-054-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 121 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-055-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 122 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-056-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 123 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-057-000 Assessable A&C 25.66 25.67 0.14 0.0 0.14 0.0 0.0 LOT 124 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-058-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 125 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-059-000 Assessable A&C 27.50 27.51 0.15 0.0 0.15 0.0 0.0 LOT 126 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-060-000 Assessable A&C 29.32 29.34 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.0 LOT 127 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-061-000 Assessable A&C 29.32 29.34 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.0 LOT 128 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-062-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 129 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-063-000 Assessable A&C 23.82 23.84 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.0 0.0 LOT 130 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-064-000 Assessable A&C 27.50 27.51 0.15 0.0 0.15 0.0 0.0 LOT 131 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-065-000 Assessable A&C 34.84 34.84 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.0 LOT 132 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-066-000 Assessable A&C 22.00 22.00 0.12 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.0 LOT 133 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-067-000 Assessable A&C 16.50 16.50 0.09 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.0 LOT 134 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-068-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 135 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-069-000 Assessable A&C 18.32 18.34 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 LOT 136 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-050-070-000 Assessable A&C 20.16 20.17 0.11 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.0 LOT 137 THE VILLAGE S-101 458-060-005-000 Assessable C 21.94 21.94 0.0 0.0 0.323 0.0 0.0 PAR 12 PMOR 28-159 458-060-006-000 Assessable C 10.58 10.59 0.0 0.0 0.1559 0.0 0.0 PAR 13 PMOR 28-159 458-060-007-000 Assessable C 17.40 17.40 0.0 0.0 0.2562 0.0 0.0 PAR 14 PMOR 28-159 458-060-010-000 Assessable C 24.20 24.21 0.0 0.0 0.3564 0.0 0.0 PAR 9 & 10 PMOR 28-159 458-060-011-000 Assessable C 21.18 21.19 0.0 0.0 0.3119 0.0 0.0 PAR 8 & 11 PMOR 28-159 458-060-012-000 Assessable C 123.56 123.56 0.0 0.0 1.819 0.0 0.0 PAR A PMOR 29-71 458-060-013-000 Assessable C 123.56 123.56 0.0 0.0 1.819 0.0 0.0 PAR B PMOR 29-71 458-060-014-000 Assessable C 105.90 105.90 0.0 0.0 1.559 0.0 0.0 PAR C PMOR 29-71 458-060-015-000 Assessable C 105.90 105.90 0.0 0.0 1.559 0.0 0.0 PAR D PMOR 29-71 458-060-016-000 Assessable C 70.64 70.65 0.0 0.0 1.04 0.0 0.0 PAR E PMOR 29-71 458-060-017-000 Common Area C - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 AC PAR F COMMON AREA Willdan Financial Services Page 5 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
464-010-001-000 Assessable B&D 10.82 10.98 0.0 0.29 0.0 0.29 0.0 LOT 107 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-002-000 Assessable B&D 10.08 10.22 0.0 0.27 0.0 0.27 0.0 LOT 108 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-003-000 Assessable B&D 8.58 8.71 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 LOT 109 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-004-000 Assessable B&D 11.58 11.74 0.0 0.31 0.0 0.31 0.0 LOT 110 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-005-000 Assessable B&D 12.32 12.49 0.0 0.33 0.0 0.33 0.0 LOT 111 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-006-000 Assessable B&D 16.44 16.66 0.0 0.44 0.0 0.44 0.0 LOT 112 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-007-000 Assessable B&D 11.58 11.74 0.0 0.31 0.0 0.31 0.0 LOT 113 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-008-000 Assessable B&D 23.16 23.47 0.0 0.62 0.0 0.62 0.0 LOT 114 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-009-000 Assessable B&D 9.70 9.84 0.0 0.26 0.0 0.26 0.0 LOT 115 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-010-000 Assessable B&D 8.58 8.71 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 LOT 116 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-011-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 117 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-012-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 118 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-013-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 119 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-014-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 120 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-015-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 121 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-016-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 122 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-017-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 123 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-018-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 124 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-019-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 125 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-020-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 126 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-021-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 127 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-010-022-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 128 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-001-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 129 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-002-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 130 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-003-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 131 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-004-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 132 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-005-000 Assessable B&D 9.34 9.47 0.0 0.25 0.0 0.25 0.0 LOT 133 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-006-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 134 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-007-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 135 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-008-000 Assessable B&D 10.08 10.22 0.0 0.27 0.0 0.27 0.0 LOT 136 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-009-000 Assessable B&D 15.32 15.52 0.0 0.41 0.0 0.41 0.0 LOT 137 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-010-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 138 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-020-011-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 139 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO. 3 MOR T-26 464-030-001-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 1 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-002-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 2 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-003-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 3 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-004-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 4 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-005-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 5 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-006-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 6 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-007-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 7 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-008-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 8 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-009-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 9 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-010-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 10 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-011-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 11 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-012-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 12 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-013-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 13 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-014-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 14 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 Willdan Financial Services Page 6 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
464-030-015-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 15 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-016-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 16 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-017-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 17 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-018-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 18 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-022-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 22 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-023-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 23 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-024-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 24 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-025-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 25 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-026-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 26 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-027-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 27 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-028-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 28 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-029-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 59 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-030-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 60 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-031-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 61 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-032-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 62 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-033-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 63 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-034-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 64 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-035-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 65 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-039-000 Assessable B&D 16.04 16.26 0.0 0.4295 0.0 0.4295 0.0 POR LOT 19 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-040-000 Assessable B&D 12.84 13.03 0.0 0.3441 0.0 0.3441 0.0 POR LOTS 19 & 20 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-030-041-000 Assessable B&D 17.32 17.55 0.0 0.4636 0.0 0.4636 0.0 LOT 21 & POR 20 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-001-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 29 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-002-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 30 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-003-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 31 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-004-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 32 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-005-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 33 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-006-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 34 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-007-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 35 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-008-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 44 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-009-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 45 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-010-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 53 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-011-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 54 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-012-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 55 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-013-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 56 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-014-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 57 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-015-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 58 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-B MOR U-79 464-040-016-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 66 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-017-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 67 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-018-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 68 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-019-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 69 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-020-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 70 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-021-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 71 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-022-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 72 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-023-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 73 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-024-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 74 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-025-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 75 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-026-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 76 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 Willdan Financial Services Page 7 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
464-040-027-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 77 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-028-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 78 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-029-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 79 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-040-030-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 80 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-001-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 36 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-002-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 37 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-003-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 38 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-004-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 39 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-005-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 40 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-006-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 41 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-007-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 42 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-008-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 43 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-015-000 Assessable B&D 15.40 15.61 0.0 0.4124 0.0 0.4124 0.0 LOT 52 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A MOR U-78 464-050-021-000 Assessable B&D 12.02 12.19 0.0 0.322 0.0 0.322 0.0 POR LOT 51 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A U-78 464-050-022-000 Assessable B&D 15.22 15.44 0.0 0.4078 0.0 0.4078 0.0 LOT 50 & POR LOT 51 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A U-78 464-050-023-000 Assessable B&D 14.58 14.78 0.0 0.3903 0.0 0.3903 0.0 LOT 49 & POR LOT 48 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A U-78 464-050-024-000 Assessable B&D 14.20 14.41 0.0 0.3805 0.0 0.3805 0.0 POR LOT 48 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A U-78 464-050-025-000 Assessable B&D 17.92 18.17 0.0 0.48 0.0 0.48 0.0 LOT 47 & P LOT 46&48 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A U-78 464-050-026-000 Assessable B&D 18.44 18.69 0.0 0.4937 0.0 0.4937 0.0 POR LOT 46 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT NO 1-A U-78 464-060-001-000 Assessable B&D 18.96 19.24 0.0 0.5072 0.0 0.5219 0.0 LOT 1 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT #5 & 6 PHASE 2 MOR W-20 464-060-002-000 Assessable B&D 19.44 19.71 0.0 0.5197 0.0 0.5349 0.0 LOT 2 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-003-000 Assessable B&D 13.98 14.19 0.0 0.3741 0.0 0.385 0.0 LOT 3 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-004-000 Assessable B&D 20.32 20.60 0.0 0.5431 0.0 0.559 0.0 LOT 4 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 5 & 6 PHASE 2 MOR W-20 464-060-005-000 Assessable B&D 16.40 16.64 0.0 0.4388 0.0 0.4516 0.0 LOT 5 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-006-000 Assessable B&D 13.98 14.19 0.0 0.3741 0.0 0.385 0.0 LOT 6 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-007-000 Assessable B&D 14.06 14.26 0.0 0.3759 0.0 0.3868 0.0 LOT 7 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-008-000 Assessable B&D 14.80 15.01 0.0 0.3957 0.0 0.4072 0.0 LOT 8 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-009-000 Assessable B&D 15.66 15.89 0.0 0.419 0.0 0.4313 0.0 LOT 9 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-010-000 Assessable B&D 15.14 15.35 0.0 0.4046 0.0 0.4164 0.0 LOT 49 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-011-000 Assessable B&D 18.64 18.90 0.0 0.4982 0.0 0.5127 0.0 LOT 50 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-012-000 Assessable B&D 14.66 14.87 0.0 0.3921 0.0 0.4035 0.0 LOT 51 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-013-000 Assessable B&D 14.60 14.80 0.0 0.3903 0.0 0.4016 0.0 LOT 52 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-060-015-000 Common Area B&D - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 AC POR LOT M2 COMMON AREA MOR W-20 464-060-016-000 Common Area B&D - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT M3 COMMON AREA MOR W-20 464-060-017-000 Common Area B&D - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POR LOT M4 COMMON AREA MOR W-20 464-070-001-000 Assessable B&D 14.46 14.67 0.0 0.3867 0.0 0.3979 0.0 LOT 10 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-002-000 Assessable B&D 14.46 14.67 0.0 0.3867 0.0 0.3979 0.0 LOT 11 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-003-000 Assessable B&D 14.46 14.67 0.0 0.3867 0.0 0.3979 0.0 LOT 12 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-004-000 Assessable B&D 14.46 14.67 0.0 0.3867 0.0 0.3979 0.0 LOT 13 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-005-000 Assessable B&D 14.46 14.67 0.0 0.3867 0.0 0.3979 0.0 LOT 14 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-006-000 Assessable B&D 15.94 16.17 0.0 0.4262 0.0 0.4387 0.0 LOT 15 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-007-000 Assessable B&D 14.60 14.80 0.0 0.3903 0.0 0.4016 0.0 LOT 16 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-008-000 Assessable B&D 12.64 12.82 0.0 0.3381 0.0 0.348 0.0 LOT 17 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-009-000 Assessable B&D 12.64 12.82 0.0 0.3381 0.0 0.348 0.0 LOT 18 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-010-000 Assessable B&D 12.32 12.41 0.0 0.3381 0.0 0.1666 0.0 LOT 19 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-011-000 Assessable B 12.02 12.02 0.0 0.3381 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 20 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-012-000 Assessable B 17.96 17.97 0.0 0.5054 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 21 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 Willdan Financial Services Page 8 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
464-070-013-000 Assessable B 15.84 15.86 0.0 0.446 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 22 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-014-000 Assessable B 13.80 13.82 0.0 0.3885 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 23 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-015-000 Assessable B 14.38 14.39 0.0 0.4046 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 24 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-016-000 Assessable B 24.30 24.30 0.0 0.6834 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 25 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-017-000 Assessable B 13.16 13.17 0.0 0.3705 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 26 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-018-000 Assessable B&D 13.56 13.59 0.0 0.3795 0.0 0.0426 0.0 LOT 27 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-019-000 Assessable B&D 13.32 13.51 0.0 0.3561 0.0 0.3665 0.0 LOT 28 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-020-000 Assessable B&D 14.80 15.01 0.0 0.3957 0.0 0.4072 0.0 LOT 29 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-021-000 Assessable B&D 13.98 14.19 0.0 0.3741 0.0 0.385 0.0 LOT 30 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-022-000 Assessable B&D 15.14 15.35 0.0 0.4046 0.0 0.4164 0.0 LOT 31 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-023-000 Assessable B&D 16.34 16.56 0.0 0.437 0.0 0.4442 0.0 LOT 32 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-024-000 Assessable B&D 14.78 14.90 0.0 0.4046 0.0 0.2221 0.0 LOT 33 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-025-000 Assessable B&D 13.66 13.71 0.0 0.3795 0.0 0.0925 0.0 LOT 34 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-026-000 Assessable B 15.28 15.28 0.0 0.4298 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 35 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-027-000 Assessable B 25.90 25.90 0.0 0.7284 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 36 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-028-000 Assessable B&D 25.06 25.37 0.0 0.6744 0.0 0.6015 0.0 LOT 37 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-029-000 Assessable B&D 13.04 13.23 0.0 0.3489 0.0 0.3591 0.0 LOT 38 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-030-000 Assessable B&D 14.72 14.94 0.0 0.3939 0.0 0.4053 0.0 LOT 39 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-031-000 Assessable B&D 14.72 14.94 0.0 0.3939 0.0 0.4053 0.0 LOT 40 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-032-000 Assessable B&D 14.72 14.94 0.0 0.3939 0.0 0.4053 0.0 LOT 41 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-033-000 Assessable B&D 14.72 14.94 0.0 0.3939 0.0 0.4053 0.0 LOT 42 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-034-000 Assessable B&D 12.70 12.89 0.0 0.3399 0.0 0.3498 0.0 LOT 43 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-035-000 Assessable B&D 15.46 15.69 0.0 0.4136 0.0 0.4257 0.0 LOT 44 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-036-000 Assessable B&D 14.92 15.14 0.0 0.3992 0.0 0.4109 0.0 LOT 45 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-037-000 Assessable B&D 14.86 15.07 0.0 0.3974 0.0 0.409 0.0 LOT 46 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-038-000 Assessable B&D 14.86 15.07 0.0 0.3974 0.0 0.409 0.0 LOT 47 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-039-000 Assessable B&D 15.60 15.82 0.0 0.4172 0.0 0.4294 0.0 LOT 48 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-040-000 Assessable B&D 13.98 14.19 0.0 0.3741 0.0 0.385 0.0 LOT 53 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-041-000 Assessable B&D 13.98 14.19 0.0 0.3741 0.0 0.385 0.0 LOT 54 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-042-000 Assessable B&D 15.34 15.55 0.0 0.41 0.0 0.422 0.0 LOT 55 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-043-000 Assessable B&D 14.66 14.87 0.0 0.3921 0.0 0.4035 0.0 LOT 56 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-044-000 Assessable B&D 24.08 24.42 0.0 0.6438 0.0 0.6626 0.0 LOT 57 ASHLEY WOODS UNITS 5 & 6 PH 2 MOR W-20 464-070-045-000 Common Area - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POR LOT M2 COMMON AREA MOR W-20 466-030-046-000 Assessable B&D 46.32 46.95 0.0 1.24 0.0 1.24 0.0 POR LOT 54 JOHNSON RANCH EAST #2 MOR Q-13 466-030-047-000 Common Area - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POR LOT 54 JOHNSON RANCH EAST #2 MOR Q-13 466-190-001-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 122 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-002-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 123 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR R-34 466-190-003-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 124 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-004-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 125 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-005-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 126 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-006-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 127 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-007-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 128 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-008-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 129 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-009-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 171 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-010-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 172 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-011-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 173 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-012-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 174 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 Willdan Financial Services Page 9 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-190-013-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 175 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-014-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 176 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-015-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 177 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-016-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 178 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-017-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 179 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-190-018-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 180 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-001-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 130 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-002-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 131 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-003-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 132 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-004-000 Assessable B 10.88 10.89 0.0 0.3063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 133 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-005-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 134 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-006-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 135 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-007-000 Assessable B 12.66 12.67 0.0 0.3563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 136 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-008-000 Assessable B 15.14 15.16 0.0 0.4263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 137 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-009-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 138 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-010-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 139 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-011-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 140 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-012-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 141 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-013-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 142 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-014-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 143 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-015-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 144 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-016-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 145 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-017-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 146 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-018-000 Assessable B 14.08 14.09 0.0 0.3963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 147 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-019-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 148 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-020-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 149 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-021-000 Assessable B 11.60 11.60 0.0 0.3263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 150 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 BK R PG 34 466-200-022-000 Assessable B 10.52 10.54 0.0 0.2963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 151 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-023-000 Assessable B 14.80 14.80 0.0 0.4163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 152 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-024-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 153 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-025-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 154 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-026-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 155 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-027-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 156 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-028-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 157 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-029-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 158 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-030-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 159 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-031-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 160 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-032-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 161 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-033-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 162 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-034-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 163 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR R-34 466-200-035-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 164 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-036-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 165 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR R-34 466-200-037-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 166 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-038-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 167 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-039-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 168 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-040-000 Assessable B 11.24 11.25 0.0 0.3163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 169 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 466-200-041-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 170 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT 3 MOR BK R PG 34 Willdan Financial Services Page 10 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-210-001-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 L19 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-002-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 20 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-003-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 21 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-004-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 22 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-005-000 Assessable B 11.94 11.96 0.0 0.3363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 23 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-006-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 24 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-007-000 Assessable B 13.02 13.03 0.0 0.3663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 25 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-008-000 Assessable B 13.38 13.38 0.0 0.3763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 26 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-009-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 27 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-010-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 28 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-011-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 29 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-012-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 30 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-013-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 31 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-014-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 32 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-015-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 33 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-016-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 34 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-017-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 35 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-018-000 Assessable B 6.98 6.98 0.0 0.1963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 36 HILLSBOROUGH #1 MOR R-33 466-210-019-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 37 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-020-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 38 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-021-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 39 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-022-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 40 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-023-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 41 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-024-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 42 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-025-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 43 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-026-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 44 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-027-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 45 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-028-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 46 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-029-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 47 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-030-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 48 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-031-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 49 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-032-000 Assessable B 10.52 10.54 0.0 0.2963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 50 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-033-000 Assessable B 11.94 11.96 0.0 0.3363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 51 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-034-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 65 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-035-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 66 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-036-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 67 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-037-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 68 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-038-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 L69 HILLSBOROUGH #1 MOR R-33 466-210-039-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 70 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-040-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 71 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-041-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 72 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-042-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 73 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-043-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 74 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-044-000 Assessable B 15.50 15.51 0.0 0.4363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 75 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-045-000 Assessable B 13.72 13.74 0.0 0.3863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 76 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-046-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 77 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-047-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 78 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 Willdan Financial Services Page 11 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-210-048-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 79 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-049-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 80 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-050-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 81 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-051-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 82 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-052-000 Assessable B 10.52 10.54 0.0 0.2963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 83 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-053-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 84 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-054-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 85 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-055-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 86 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-056-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 87 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-057-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 88 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-058-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 89 HILLSBOROUGH #1 MOR R-33 466-210-059-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 90 HILLSBOROUGH #1 MOR R-33 466-210-060-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 91 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-061-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 92 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-062-000 Assessable B 13.72 13.74 0.0 0.3863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 93 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-063-000 Assessable B 13.02 13.03 0.0 0.3663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 94 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-064-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 95 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-065-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 96 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-066-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 97 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-210-067-000 Assessable B 12.30 12.31 0.0 0.3463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 98 HILLSBOROUGH #1 MOR R-33 466-210-068-000 Assessable B 11.60 11.60 0.0 0.3263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 99 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-001-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 1 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-002-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 2 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-003-000 Assessable B 12.66 12.67 0.0 0.3563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 3 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-004-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 4 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-005-000 Assessable B 10.52 10.54 0.0 0.2963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 5 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT #1 MOR BK R PG 33 466-220-006-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 6 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-007-000 Assessable B 6.98 6.98 0.0 0.1963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 7 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-008-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 8 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-009-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 9 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-010-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 10 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-011-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 11 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-012-000 Assessable B 12.66 12.67 0.0 0.3563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 12 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-013-000 Assessable B 10.88 10.89 0.0 0.3063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 13 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-014-000 Assessable B 12.66 12.67 0.0 0.3563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 14 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-015-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 15 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-016-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 L16 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-017-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 17 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-018-000 Assessable B 10.88 10.89 0.0 0.3063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 18 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-019-000 Assessable B 11.94 11.96 0.0 0.3363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 52 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-020-000 Assessable B 10.52 10.54 0.0 0.2963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 53 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-021-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 54 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-022-000 Assessable B 10.18 10.18 0.0 0.2863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 55 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-023-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 56 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-024-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 57 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-025-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 58 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-026-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 59 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 Willdan Financial Services Page 12 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-220-027-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 60 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-028-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 61 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-029-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 62 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-030-000 Assessable B 10.52 10.54 0.0 0.2963 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 63 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-031-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 64 HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-220-032-000 Assessable B 10.88 10.89 0.0 0.3063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 100 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-033-000 Assessable B 12.66 12.67 0.0 0.3563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 101 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-034-000 Assessable B 10.88 10.89 0.0 0.3063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 102 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-035-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 103 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-036-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 104 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-037-000 Assessable B 8.40 8.40 0.0 0.2363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 105 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-038-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 106 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-039-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 107 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-040-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.69 0.0 0.2163 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 108 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-041-000 Assessable B 8.74 8.76 0.0 0.2463 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 109 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-042-000 Assessable B 9.10 9.11 0.0 0.2563 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 110 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-043-000 Assessable B 11.94 11.96 0.0 0.3363 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 111 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-044-000 Assessable B 11.60 11.60 0.0 0.3263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 112 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT #1 MOR R-33 466-220-045-000 Assessable B 11.60 11.60 0.0 0.3263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 113 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-046-000 Assessable B 10.88 10.89 0.0 0.3063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 114 HILLSBOROUGH#1 MOR BK R PG 33 466-220-047-000 Assessable B 7.32 7.34 0.0 0.2063 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 115 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-048-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 116 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-049-000 Assessable B 9.82 9.83 0.0 0.2763 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 117 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-050-000 Assessable B 11.60 11.60 0.0 0.3263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 118 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-051-000 Assessable B 13.72 13.74 0.0 0.3863 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 119 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT #1 MOR R-33 466-220-052-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 120 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-220-053-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2263 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 121 HILLSBOROUGH#1 BK R PG 33 466-230-002-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L D HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-230-003-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L G HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-230-004-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L H HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-230-005-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L I HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-230-006-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L J HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-230-007-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L K HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-230-008-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L L HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-230-009-000 Common B - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L M HILLSBOROUGH #1 BK R PG 33 466-280-001-000 Assessable B&D 9.06 9.19 0.0 0.2427 0.0 0.2427 0.0 LOT 1 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-002-000 Assessable B&D 7.94 8.05 0.0 0.2127 0.0 0.2127 0.0 LOT 2 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-003-000 Assessable B&D 7.94 8.05 0.0 0.2127 0.0 0.2127 0.0 LOT 3 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-004-000 Assessable B&D 9.44 9.57 0.0 0.2527 0.0 0.2527 0.0 LOT 4 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-005-000 Assessable B&D 13.92 14.11 0.0 0.3727 0.0 0.3727 0.0 LOT 5 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-006-000 Assessable B&D 25.50 25.85 0.0 0.6827 0.0 0.6827 0.0 LOT 6 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-007-000 Assessable B&D 9.06 9.19 0.0 0.2427 0.0 0.2427 0.0 LOT 7 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-008-000 Assessable B&D 10.18 10.33 0.0 0.2727 0.0 0.2727 0.0 LOT 8 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-009-000 Assessable B&D 10.18 10.33 0.0 0.2727 0.0 0.2727 0.0 LOT 9 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-010-000 Assessable B&D 9.06 9.19 0.0 0.2427 0.0 0.2427 0.0 LOT 10 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-011-000 Assessable B&D 17.66 17.90 0.0 0.4727 0.0 0.4727 0.0 LOT 11 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-012-000 Assessable B&D 8.32 8.43 0.0 0.2227 0.0 0.2227 0.0 LOT 12 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 Willdan Financial Services Page 13 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-280-013-000 Assessable B&D 7.20 7.30 0.0 0.1927 0.0 0.1927 0.0 LOT 13 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-014-000 Assessable B&D 7.94 8.05 0.0 0.2127 0.0 0.2127 0.0 LOT 14 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-280-015-000 Assessable B&D 10.18 10.33 0.0 0.2727 0.0 0.2727 0.0 LOT 15 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-001-000 Assessable B&D 6.02 6.11 0.0 0.1613 0.0 0.1613 0.0 LOT 35 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-002-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 36 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-003-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 37 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-004-000 Assessable B&D 6.02 6.11 0.0 0.1613 0.0 0.1613 0.0 LOT 38 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-005-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 39 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-006-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 40 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-007-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 41 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-008-000 Assessable B&D 8.64 8.76 0.0 0.2313 0.0 0.2313 0.0 LOT 42 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-009-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 43 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-010-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 44 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-011-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 45 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-012-000 Assessable B&D 10.88 11.03 0.0 0.2913 0.0 0.2913 0.0 LOT 46 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-013-000 Assessable B&D 16.48 16.71 0.0 0.4413 0.0 0.4413 0.0 LOT 47 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-014-000 Assessable B&D 15.74 15.95 0.0 0.4213 0.0 0.4213 0.0 LOT 48 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-015-000 Assessable B&D 13.12 13.30 0.0 0.3513 0.0 0.3513 0.0 LOT 49 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-016-000 Assessable B&D 10.88 11.03 0.0 0.2913 0.0 0.2913 0.0 LOT 50 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-017-000 Assessable B&D 10.50 10.65 0.0 0.2813 0.0 0.2813 0.0 LOT 51 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-018-000 Assessable B&D 15.36 15.57 0.0 0.4113 0.0 0.4113 0.0 LOT 52 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-019-000 Assessable B&D 11.62 11.79 0.0 0.3113 0.0 0.3113 0.0 LOT 53 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-020-000 Assessable B&D 25.82 26.17 0.0 0.6913 0.0 0.6913 0.0 LOT 54 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-021-000 Assessable B&D 10.50 10.65 0.0 0.2813 0.0 0.2813 0.0 LOT 55 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-022-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 56 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-023-000 Assessable B&D 9.38 9.51 0.0 0.2513 0.0 0.2513 0.0 LOT 57 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-024-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 58 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-025-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 59 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-026-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 60 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-027-000 Assessable B&D 13.86 14.06 0.0 0.3713 0.0 0.3713 0.0 LOT 61 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-028-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 62 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-029-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 63 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-030-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 64 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-031-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 65 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-032-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 66 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-290-033-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 67 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-001-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 28 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-002-000 Assessable B&D 9.76 9.89 0.0 0.2613 0.0 0.2613 0.0 LOT 29 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-003-000 Assessable B&D 10.12 10.27 0.0 0.2713 0.0 0.2713 0.0 LOT 30 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-004-000 Assessable B&D 10.88 11.03 0.0 0.2913 0.0 0.2913 0.0 LOT 31 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-005-000 Assessable B&D 14.98 15.19 0.0 0.4013 0.0 0.4013 0.0 LOT 32 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-006-000 Assessable B&D 12.00 12.17 0.0 0.3213 0.0 0.3213 0.0 LOT 33 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-007-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 34 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-008-000 Assessable B&D 9.38 9.51 0.0 0.2513 0.0 0.2513 0.0 LOT 68 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-009-000 Assessable B&D 8.64 8.76 0.0 0.2313 0.0 0.2313 0.0 LOT 69 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-010-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 70 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-011-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 71 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 Willdan Financial Services Page 14 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-300-012-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 72 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-013-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 73 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-014-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 74 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-015-000 Assessable B&D 12.36 12.54 0.0 0.3313 0.0 0.3313 0.0 LOT 75 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-016-000 Assessable B&D 9.38 9.51 0.0 0.2513 0.0 0.2513 0.0 LOT 76 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-017-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 77 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-018-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 78 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-019-000 Assessable B&D 11.24 11.41 0.0 0.3013 0.0 0.3013 0.0 LOT 79 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-020-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 80 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-021-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 81 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-022-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 82 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-023-000 Assessable B&D 6.40 6.49 0.0 0.1713 0.0 0.1713 0.0 LOT 83 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-024-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 84 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-025-000 Assessable B&D 6.02 6.11 0.0 0.1613 0.0 0.1613 0.0 LOT 85 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-026-000 Assessable B&D 6.02 6.11 0.0 0.1613 0.0 0.1613 0.0 LOT 86 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-027-000 Assessable B&D 8.64 8.76 0.0 0.2313 0.0 0.2313 0.0 LOT 87 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-028-000 Assessable B&D 12.00 12.17 0.0 0.3213 0.0 0.3213 0.0 LOT 88 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-029-000 Assessable B&D 9.38 9.51 0.0 0.2513 0.0 0.2513 0.0 LOT 89 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-030-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 90 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-031-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 91 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-032-000 Assessable B&D 12.00 12.17 0.0 0.3213 0.0 0.3213 0.0 LOT 92 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-033-000 Assessable B&D 10.12 10.27 0.0 0.2713 0.0 0.2713 0.0 LOT 93 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-034-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 94 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-300-035-000 Assessable B&D 12.36 12.54 0.0 0.3313 0.0 0.3313 0.0 LOT 95 EASTRIDGE UNIT 1 S-66 466-310-001-000 Assessable B&D 16.58 16.82 0.0 0.4442 0.0 0.4442 0.0 LOT 16 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-006-000 Assessable B&D 12.10 12.27 0.0 0.3242 0.0 0.3242 0.0 LOT 21 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-007-000 Assessable B&D 9.12 9.25 0.0 0.2442 0.0 0.2442 0.0 LOT 22 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-008-000 Assessable B&D 11.36 11.52 0.0 0.3042 0.0 0.3042 0.0 LOT 23 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-009-000 Assessable B&D 12.86 13.03 0.0 0.3442 0.0 0.3442 0.0 LOT 24 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-010-000 Assessable B&D 10.24 10.38 0.0 0.2742 0.0 0.2742 0.0 LOT 25 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-011-000 Assessable B&D 10.24 10.38 0.0 0.2742 0.0 0.2742 0.0 LOT 26 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-012-000 Assessable B&D 13.22 13.41 0.0 0.3542 0.0 0.3542 0.0 LOT 27 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-016-000 Assessable B&D 14.94 15.14 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 POR LOT 17 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-017-000 Assessable B&D 17.56 17.80 0.0 0.47 0.0 0.47 0.0 POR LOTS 17 & 18 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-018-000 Assessable B&D 13.06 13.25 0.0 0.35 0.0 0.35 0.0 POR LOTS 18 & 19 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-310-019-000 Assessable B&D 18.30 18.55 0.0 0.49 0.0 0.49 0.0 LOT 20 & POR LOT 19 EASTRIDGE UNIT 2 S-67 466-320-001-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 96 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-002-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 97 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-003-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 98 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-004-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 99 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-005-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 100 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-006-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 101 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-007-000 Assessable B&D 6.40 6.49 0.0 0.1713 0.0 0.1713 0.0 LOT 102 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-008-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 103 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-009-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 104 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-010-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 105 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-011-000 Assessable B&D 9.76 9.89 0.0 0.2613 0.0 0.2613 0.0 LOT 106 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 Willdan Financial Services Page 15 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-320-012-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 107 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-013-000 Assessable B&D 9.76 9.89 0.0 0.2613 0.0 0.2613 0.0 LOT 108 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-014-000 Assessable B&D 10.50 10.65 0.0 0.2813 0.0 0.2813 0.0 LOT 109 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-015-000 Assessable B&D 10.12 10.27 0.0 0.2713 0.0 0.2713 0.0 LOT 110 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-016-000 Assessable B&D 14.62 14.82 0.0 0.3913 0.0 0.3913 0.0 LOT 111 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-017-000 Assessable B&D 16.86 17.09 0.0 0.4513 0.0 0.4513 0.0 LOT 112 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-018-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 113 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-019-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 114 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-020-000 Assessable B&D 9.38 9.51 0.0 0.2513 0.0 0.2513 0.0 LOT 115 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-021-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 116 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-022-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 117 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-023-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 118 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-024-000 Assessable B&D 9.38 9.51 0.0 0.2513 0.0 0.2513 0.0 LOT 119 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-025-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 120 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-026-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 121 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-027-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 122 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-028-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 123 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-029-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 124 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-030-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 125 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-031-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 126 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-032-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 127 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-033-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 128 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-034-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 129 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-035-000 Assessable B&D 8.64 8.76 0.0 0.2313 0.0 0.2313 0.0 LOT 130 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-036-000 Assessable B&D 6.02 6.11 0.0 0.1613 0.0 0.1613 0.0 LOT 131 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-037-000 Assessable B&D 6.02 6.11 0.0 0.1613 0.0 0.1613 0.0 LOT 132 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-038-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 133 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-039-000 Assessable B&D 6.02 6.11 0.0 0.1613 0.0 0.1613 0.0 LOT 134 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-040-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 135 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-041-000 Assessable B&D 6.76 6.86 0.0 0.1813 0.0 0.1813 0.0 LOT 136 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-042-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 137 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-043-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 138 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-044-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 139 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-045-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 140 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-046-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 141 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-047-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 142 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-048-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 143 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-049-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 144 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-050-000 Assessable B&D 7.52 7.62 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.2013 0.0 LOT 145 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-051-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 146 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-052-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 147 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-053-000 Assessable B&D 7.14 7.24 0.0 0.1913 0.0 0.1913 0.0 LOT 148 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-054-000 Assessable B&D 10.50 10.65 0.0 0.2813 0.0 0.2813 0.0 LOT 149 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-055-000 Assessable B&D 9.38 9.51 0.0 0.2513 0.0 0.2513 0.0 LOT 150 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-056-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 151 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-057-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 152 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-058-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 153 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 Willdan Financial Services Page 16 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-320-059-000 Assessable B&D 7.88 8.00 0.0 0.2113 0.0 0.2113 0.0 LOT 154 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-060-000 Assessable B&D 8.26 8.38 0.0 0.2213 0.0 0.2213 0.0 LOT 155 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-320-061-000 Assessable B&D 9.00 9.14 0.0 0.2413 0.0 0.2413 0.0 LOT 156 EASTRIDGE UNIT 3 MOR S-68 466-350-001-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 193 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-002-000 Assessable B&D 9.68 9.81 0.0 0.2591 0.0 0.2591 0.0 LOT 194 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-003-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 195 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-004-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 196 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-005-000 Assessable B&D 8.56 8.67 0.0 0.2291 0.0 0.2291 0.0 LOT 197 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-006-000 Assessable B&D 10.80 10.95 0.0 0.2891 0.0 0.2891 0.0 LOT 198 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-007-000 Assessable B&D 10.04 10.19 0.0 0.2691 0.0 0.2691 0.0 LOT 199 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-008-000 Assessable B&D 7.80 7.92 0.0 0.2091 0.0 0.2091 0.0 LOT 200 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-009-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 201 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-010-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 202 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-011-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 203 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-012-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 204 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-013-000 Assessable B&D 9.30 9.43 0.0 0.2491 0.0 0.2491 0.0 LOT 205 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-014-000 Assessable B&D 7.42 7.54 0.0 0.1991 0.0 0.1991 0.0 LOT 206 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-015-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 207 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-016-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 208 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-017-000 Assessable B&D 8.18 8.30 0.0 0.2191 0.0 0.2191 0.0 LOT 209 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-018-000 Assessable B&D 7.42 7.54 0.0 0.1991 0.0 0.1991 0.0 LOT 210 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-019-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 211 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-020-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 212 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-021-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 213 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-022-000 Assessable B&D 8.92 9.05 0.0 0.2391 0.0 0.2391 0.0 LOT 214 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-023-000 Assessable B&D 10.04 10.19 0.0 0.2691 0.0 0.2691 0.0 LOT 215 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-024-000 Assessable B&D 8.18 8.30 0.0 0.2191 0.0 0.2191 0.0 LOT 216 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-025-000 Assessable B&D 8.92 9.05 0.0 0.2391 0.0 0.2391 0.0 LOT 217 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-026-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 218 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-350-027-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 219 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-001-000 Assessable B&D 7.42 7.54 0.0 0.1991 0.0 0.1991 0.0 LOT 140 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-002-000 Assessable B&D 7.80 7.92 0.0 0.2091 0.0 0.2091 0.0 LOT 141 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-003-000 Assessable B&D 8.56 8.67 0.0 0.2291 0.0 0.2291 0.0 LOT 142 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-004-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 143 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-005-000 Assessable B&D 7.42 7.54 0.0 0.1991 0.0 0.1991 0.0 LOT 144 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-006-000 Assessable B&D 8.56 8.67 0.0 0.2291 0.0 0.2291 0.0 LOT 145 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-007-000 Assessable B&D 9.68 9.81 0.0 0.2591 0.0 0.2591 0.0 LOT 146 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-008-000 Assessable B&D 10.04 10.19 0.0 0.2691 0.0 0.2691 0.0 LOT 147 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-009-000 Assessable B&D 8.56 8.67 0.0 0.2291 0.0 0.2291 0.0 LOT 148 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-010-000 Assessable B&D 8.18 8.30 0.0 0.2191 0.0 0.2191 0.0 LOT 149 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-011-000 Assessable B&D 7.80 7.92 0.0 0.2091 0.0 0.2091 0.0 LOT 164 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-012-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 165 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-013-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 166 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-014-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 167 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-015-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 168 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-016-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 169 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-017-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 170 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 Willdan Financial Services Page 17 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-360-018-000 Assessable B&D 7.80 7.92 0.0 0.2091 0.0 0.2091 0.0 LOT 171 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-019-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 172 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-020-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 173 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-021-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 174 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-022-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 175 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-023-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 176 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-024-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 177 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-025-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 178 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-026-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 179 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-027-000 Assessable B&D 7.42 7.54 0.0 0.1991 0.0 0.1991 0.0 LOT 180 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-028-000 Assessable B&D 8.92 9.05 0.0 0.2391 0.0 0.2391 0.0 LOT 183 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-029-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 184 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-030-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 185 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-031-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 186 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-032-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 187 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-033-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 188 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-034-000 Assessable B&D 9.30 9.43 0.0 0.2491 0.0 0.2491 0.0 LOT 189 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-035-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 190 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-036-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 191 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-037-000 Assessable B&D 7.80 7.92 0.0 0.2091 0.0 0.2091 0.0 LOT 192 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-360-038-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 220 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-001-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 150 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-002-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 151 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-003-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 152 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-004-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 153 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-005-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 154 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-006-000 Assessable B&D 6.30 6.40 0.0 0.1691 0.0 0.1691 0.0 LOT 155 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-007-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 156 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-008-000 Assessable B&D 7.06 7.16 0.0 0.1891 0.0 0.1891 0.0 LOT 157 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-009-000 Assessable B&D 27.98 28.36 0.0 0.7491 0.0 0.7491 0.0 LOT 158 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-010-000 Assessable B&D 12.28 12.46 0.0 0.3291 0.0 0.3291 0.0 LOT 159 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-011-000 Assessable B&D 10.80 10.95 0.0 0.2891 0.0 0.2891 0.0 LOT 160 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-012-000 Assessable B&D 7.42 7.54 0.0 0.1991 0.0 0.1991 0.0 LOT 161 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-013-000 Assessable B&D 8.92 9.05 0.0 0.2391 0.0 0.2391 0.0 LOT 162 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-014-000 Assessable B&D 9.70 9.84 0.0 0.26 0.0 0.26 0.0 LOT 163 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-015-000 Assessable B&D 6.68 6.78 0.0 0.1791 0.0 0.1791 0.0 LOT 181 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-370-016-000 Assessable B&D 8.18 8.30 0.0 0.2191 0.0 0.2191 0.0 LOT 182 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 4 MOR S-95 466-390-001-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 161 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-002-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 162 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-003-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 163 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-004-000 Assessable B&D 8.58 8.71 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 LOT 164 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-005-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 165 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-006-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 166 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-007-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 167 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-008-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 168 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-009-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 169 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-010-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 170 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 Willdan Financial Services Page 18 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-390-011-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 171 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-012-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 172 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-013-000 Assessable B&D 8.96 9.09 0.0 0.24 0.0 0.24 0.0 LOT 173 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-014-000 Assessable B&D 8.96 9.09 0.0 0.24 0.0 0.24 0.0 LOT 174 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-017-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 177 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-018-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 178 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-019-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 179 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-020-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 180 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-021-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 181 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-022-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 182 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-023-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 198 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-024-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 199 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-025-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 200 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-026-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 201 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-027-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 202 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-028-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 203 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-029-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 204 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-030-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 205 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-031-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 206 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-032-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 207 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-034-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 224 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-035-000 Assessable B&D 8.58 8.71 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 LOT 225 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-036-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 226 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-037-000 Assessable B&D 9.70 9.84 0.0 0.26 0.0 0.26 0.0 LOT 227 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-038-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 228 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-039-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 229 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-040-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 230 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-041-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 231 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-043-000 Assessable B&D 11.94 12.12 0.0 0.32 0.0 0.32 0.0 POR LOT 175 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-390-045-000 Assessable B&D 11.58 11.74 0.0 0.31 0.0 0.31 0.0 LOT 176 & POR LOT 175 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-001-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 157 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-002-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 158 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-003-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 159 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-004-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 160 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-005-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 183 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-006-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 184 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-007-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 185 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-008-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 186 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-009-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 187 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-010-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 188 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 MOR BK T PG 11 466-400-011-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 189 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 MOR T-11 466-400-012-000 Assessable B&D 9.34 9.47 0.0 0.25 0.0 0.25 0.0 LOT 190 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-013-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 191 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-014-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 192 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-015-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 193 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-016-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 194 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-017-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 195 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 Willdan Financial Services Page 19 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-400-018-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 196 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-019-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 197 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-020-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 208 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-021-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 209 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-022-000 Assessable B&D 6.34 6.44 0.0 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.0 LOT 210 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-023-000 Assessable B&D 6.72 6.82 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.18 0.0 LOT 211 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-024-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 212 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-025-000 Assessable B&D 8.58 8.71 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 LOT 213 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-026-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 214 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-027-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 215 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-028-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 216 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-029-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 217 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-030-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 218 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-031-000 Assessable B&D 8.58 8.71 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 LOT 219 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-032-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 220 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-033-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 221 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-034-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 222 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-035-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 223 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-036-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 232 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-037-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 233 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-038-000 Assessable B&D 5.96 6.06 0.0 0.16 0.0 0.16 0.0 LOT 234 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-039-000 Assessable B&D 7.84 7.95 0.0 0.21 0.0 0.21 0.0 LOT 235 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-400-040-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 236 EASTRIDGE UNIT NO 4 T-11 466-410-003-000 Assessable B&D 20.16 20.45 0.0 0.54 0.0 0.54 0.0 LOT 83 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-004-000 Assessable B&D 16.44 16.66 0.0 0.44 0.0 0.44 0.0 LOT 84 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-005-000 Assessable B&D 13.82 14.01 0.0 0.37 0.0 0.37 0.0 LOT 85 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-006-000 Assessable B&D 12.32 12.49 0.0 0.33 0.0 0.33 0.0 LOT 86 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-007-000 Assessable B&D 16.06 16.28 0.0 0.43 0.0 0.43 0.0 LOT 87 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-008-000 Assessable B&D 11.58 11.74 0.0 0.31 0.0 0.31 0.0 LOT 88 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-009-000 Assessable B&D 13.06 13.25 0.0 0.35 0.0 0.35 0.0 LOT 89 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-010-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 90 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-011-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 91 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-012-000 Assessable B&D 7.08 7.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 0.19 0.0 LOT 92 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-013-000 Assessable B&D 8.58 8.71 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 LOT 93 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-014-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 94 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-015-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 95 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-016-000 Assessable B&D 9.34 9.47 0.0 0.25 0.0 0.25 0.0 LOT 96 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-018-000 Assessable B&D 16.44 16.66 0.0 0.44 0.0 0.44 0.0 LOT 98 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-019-000 Assessable B&D 9.34 9.47 0.0 0.25 0.0 0.25 0.0 LOT 99 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-020-000 Assessable B&D 7.46 7.57 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 LOT 100 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-021-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 101 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-022-000 Assessable B&D 8.22 8.33 0.0 0.22 0.0 0.22 0.0 LOT 102 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-023-000 Assessable B&D 11.58 11.74 0.0 0.31 0.0 0.31 0.0 LOT 103 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-024-000 Assessable B&D 12.32 12.49 0.0 0.33 0.0 0.33 0.0 LOT 104 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-025-000 Assessable B&D 8.96 9.09 0.0 0.24 0.0 0.24 0.0 LOT 105 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-034-000 Common B&D - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POR LOT C OPEN SPACE ASHLEY WOOD #2 466-410-036-000 Assessable B&D 22.78 23.10 0.0 0.61 0.0 0.61 0.0 POR LOT 97 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 Willdan Financial Services Page 20 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-410-041-000 Assessable B&D 16.80 17.04 0.0 0.45 0.0 0.45 0.0 POR LOT 106 ASHLEY WOODS UNIT 2 T-13 466-410-043-000 Assessable B&D 16.44 16.66 0.0 0.44 0.0 0.44 0.0 L82ASHLEY WOODS UN2T-13&P L J PUB UTLTY ESMT T-13 466-410-044-000 Assessable B&D 10.82 10.98 0.0 0.29 0.0 0.29 0.0 L81ASHLEY WOODS UN2T-13&P L J PUB UTLTY ESMT T-13 466-490-001-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.58 0.0 0.2132 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 223 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-002-000 Assessable B 8.38 8.40 0.0 0.2362 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 224 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-003-000 Assessable B 9.42 9.44 0.0 0.2654 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 225 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-004-000 Assessable B 11.76 11.77 0.0 0.3309 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 226 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-005-000 Assessable B 9.02 9.04 0.0 0.2541 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 227 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-006-000 Assessable B 8.94 8.95 0.0 0.2516 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 228 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-007-000 Assessable B 9.84 9.84 0.0 0.2768 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 229 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-008-000 Assessable B 12.34 12.35 0.0 0.3473 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 230 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-009-000 Assessable B 11.14 11.16 0.0 0.3137 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 231 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-010-000 Assessable B 9.46 9.47 0.0 0.2663 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 232 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-011-000 Assessable B 10.46 10.48 0.0 0.2947 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 233 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-012-000 Assessable B 13.94 13.96 0.0 0.3925 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 234 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-013-000 Assessable B 9.50 9.52 0.0 0.2676 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 235 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-014-000 Assessable B 9.08 9.09 0.0 0.2557 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 236 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-015-000 Assessable B 8.14 8.15 0.0 0.2291 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 237 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-016-000 Assessable B 10.56 10.57 0.0 0.2973 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 238 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-017-000 Assessable B 7.72 7.74 0.0 0.2176 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 239 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-018-000 Assessable B 9.54 9.55 0.0 0.2686 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 240 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-019-000 Assessable B 7.44 7.45 0.0 0.2094 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 241 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-020-000 Assessable B 7.54 7.55 0.0 0.2123 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 242 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-021-000 Assessable B 16.86 16.86 0.0 0.4742 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 269 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-022-000 Assessable B 12.96 12.97 0.0 0.3647 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 270 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-023-000 Assessable B 10.08 10.08 0.0 0.2836 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 271 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-024-000 Assessable B 11.80 11.80 0.0 0.3319 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 272 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-025-000 Assessable B 9.80 9.81 0.0 0.2759 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 273 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-026-000 Assessable B 8.48 8.49 0.0 0.2387 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 274 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-027-000 Assessable B 8.46 8.47 0.0 0.2383 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 275 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-028-000 Assessable B 7.72 7.74 0.0 0.2176 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 276 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-029-000 Assessable B 7.80 7.81 0.0 0.2197 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 277 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-030-000 Assessable B 7.84 7.85 0.0 0.2207 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 278 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-031-000 Assessable B 7.64 7.66 0.0 0.2154 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 279 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-032-000 Assessable B 7.54 7.56 0.0 0.2125 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 280 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-033-000 Assessable B 7.60 7.62 0.0 0.2142 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 281 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-490-034-000 Assessable B 8.88 8.89 0.0 0.25 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 282 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-001-000 Assessable B 13.12 13.13 0.0 0.3691 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 207 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-002-000 Assessable B 10.44 10.45 0.0 0.2939 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 208 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-003-000 Assessable B 8.04 8.05 0.0 0.2265 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 209 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-004-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.59 0.0 0.2134 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 210 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-005-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.59 0.0 0.2134 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 211 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-006-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.59 0.0 0.2134 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 212 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-007-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.59 0.0 0.2134 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 213 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-008-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.59 0.0 0.2134 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 214 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-009-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.59 0.0 0.2135 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 215 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-010-000 Assessable B 7.56 7.56 0.0 0.2126 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 216 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 Willdan Financial Services Page 21 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-500-011-000 Assessable B 12.24 12.25 0.0 0.3446 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 217 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-012-000 Assessable B 8.64 8.64 0.0 0.2431 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 218 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-013-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.58 0.0 0.2133 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 219 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-014-000 Assessable B 7.42 7.42 0.0 0.2088 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 220 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-015-000 Assessable B 7.14 7.16 0.0 0.2013 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 221 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-016-000 Assessable B 7.68 7.70 0.0 0.2165 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 222 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-017-000 Assessable B 10.82 10.82 0.0 0.3043 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 243 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-018-000 Assessable B 9.64 9.65 0.0 0.2714 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 244 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-019-000 Assessable B 12.00 12.01 0.0 0.3377 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 245 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-020-000 Assessable B 10.58 10.59 0.0 0.2977 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 246 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-021-000 Assessable B 8.32 8.32 0.0 0.2341 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 247 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-022-000 Assessable B 7.62 7.63 0.0 0.2146 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 248 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-023-000 Assessable B 9.08 9.10 0.0 0.2558 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 249 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-024-000 Assessable B 8.82 8.83 0.0 0.2484 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 250 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-025-000 Assessable B 7.58 7.60 0.0 0.2136 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 251 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-026-000 Assessable B 10.46 10.47 0.0 0.2945 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 252 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-027-000 Assessable B 8.24 8.25 0.0 0.2321 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 253 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-028-000 Assessable B 8.30 8.31 0.0 0.2338 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 254 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-029-000 Assessable B 7.54 7.54 0.0 0.2121 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 255 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-030-000 Assessable B 7.80 7.82 0.0 0.2199 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 256 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-031-000 Assessable B 10.78 10.78 0.0 0.3032 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 257 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-032-000 Assessable B 8.30 8.32 0.0 0.2339 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 258 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-033-000 Assessable B 8.00 8.00 0.0 0.2251 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 267 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-500-034-000 Assessable B 10.06 10.07 0.0 0.2833 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 268 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2A T-47 466-520-001-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 181 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-002-000 Assessable B 9.42 9.42 0.0 0.265 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 182 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-003-000 Assessable B 9.42 9.42 0.0 0.265 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 183 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-004-000 Assessable B 10.02 10.03 0.0 0.282 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 184 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-005-000 Assessable B 7.52 7.54 0.0 0.212 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 185 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-006-000 Assessable B 11.10 11.12 0.0 0.3127 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 186 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-007-000 Assessable B 11.30 11.31 0.0 0.318 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 187 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-008-000 Assessable B 10.16 10.18 0.0 0.2862 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 188 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-009-000 Assessable B 11.30 11.31 0.0 0.318 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 189 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-010-000 Assessable B 7.52 7.54 0.0 0.212 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 190 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-011-000 Assessable B 11.30 11.31 0.0 0.318 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 283 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-012-000 Assessable B 7.90 7.92 0.0 0.2226 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 284 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-013-000 Assessable B 9.18 9.20 0.0 0.2586 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 285 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-014-000 Assessable B 11.30 11.31 0.0 0.318 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 286 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-015-000 Assessable B 10.16 10.18 0.0 0.2862 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 287 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-016-000 Assessable B 8.66 8.67 0.0 0.2438 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 288 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-017-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 289 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-018-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 290 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-019-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 291 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-020-000 Assessable B 7.90 7.92 0.0 0.2226 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 292 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-021-000 Assessable B 8.28 8.29 0.0 0.2332 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 293 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-022-000 Assessable B 8.66 8.67 0.0 0.2438 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 294 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-023-000 Assessable B 6.02 6.03 0.0 0.1696 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 295 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 Willdan Financial Services Page 22 of 23

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE TOTAL
CHARGE

MAXIMUM
ASMT
ACRES
ZONE A
ACRES
ZONE B
ACRES
ZONE C
ACRES
ZONE D
ACRES

ZONE E LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Johnson Ranch Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2024/25 Preliminary Assessment Roll
466-520-024-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 296 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-520-025-000 Assessable B 7.16 7.16 0.0 0.2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 297 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-001-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 191 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-002-000 Assessable B 6.58 6.60 0.0 0.1855 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 192 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-003-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 193 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-004-000 Assessable B 8.66 8.67 0.0 0.2438 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 194 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-005-000 Assessable B 8.28 8.29 0.0 0.2332 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 195 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-006-000 Assessable B 7.90 7.92 0.0 0.2226 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 196 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-007-000 Assessable B 7.52 7.54 0.0 0.212 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 197 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-008-000 Assessable B 7.52 7.54 0.0 0.212 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 198 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-009-000 Assessable B 7.52 7.54 0.0 0.212 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 199 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-010-000 Assessable B 7.90 7.92 0.0 0.2226 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 200 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-011-000 Assessable B 8.28 8.29 0.0 0.2332 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 201 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-012-000 Assessable B 7.90 7.92 0.0 0.2226 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 202 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-013-000 Assessable B 7.16 7.16 0.0 0.2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 203 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-014-000 Assessable B 7.16 7.16 0.0 0.2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 204 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-015-000 Assessable B 7.90 7.92 0.0 0.2226 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 205 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-016-000 Assessable B 8.28 8.29 0.0 0.2332 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 206 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-017-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 259 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-018-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 260 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-019-000 Assessable B 6.78 6.78 0.0 0.1908 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 261 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-020-000 Assessable B 6.40 6.41 0.0 0.1802 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 262 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-021-000 Assessable B 82.92 82.92 0.0 2.3319 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 263 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-022-000 Assessable B 86.68 86.69 0.0 2.4379 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 264 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-023-000 Assessable B 79.14 79.15 0.0 2.2259 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 265 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 466-530-024-000 Assessable B 7.16 7.16 0.0 0.2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOT 266 HILLSBOROUGH UNIT NO 2B T-86 Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 1,060
LEVIED PARCELS 1,044
TOTAL CHARGE $49,087.04
MAXIMUM ASMT $55,424.31
ACRES ZONE A 101.5984
ACRES ZONE B 227.5064
ACRES ZONE C 132.6061
ACRES ZONE D 140.9012
ACRES ZONE E 13.6282
Willdan Financial Services Page 23 of 23

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-135

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ENGINEER’S LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NORTH CENTRAL ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025, PURSUANT TO THE PRO VISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council ha s, by previous Resoluti ons, formed the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District and annexed territory therein (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the mainte nance and services of s treet lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the esta blishment of the assess ments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE NORTH CENTRAL ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the E ngineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial c hanges in existing impr ovements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials and/or improvements for certain areas, including landscape, lighting, park, open space , parkway, slope and median areas together with trees, shrubs, turf and other ornamental vegetation, drainage and irrigation systems , recreation equipment , bike paths, pedestrian trails , walls and fences , other public improvements within the street right of way areas and other appurtenant facilities as further described in the Engineer’s Report . The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

2 RESOLUTION NO. 24-135

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-136

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE NORTH CENTRAL ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting Dis trict (hereafter referred to as the “District”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 , Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California , beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay the maintenance , operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE NORTH CENTRAL ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials o r improvements for certain areas, including landscape, lighting, park, open space , parkway, slope and median areas together with trees, shrubs, turf and other ornamental vegetation , drainage and irrigation systems , recreation equipment , bike paths, pedestr ian trails, walls and fences , other public improvements within the street right of way areas and other appurtenant facilities as further described in the Engineer’s Report . The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District and any annexations thereto . The District generally in cludes the parcels within the area known as the North Central Roseville Specific Plan. The District is known and designated as

“North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District”

Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adju stment previo usly authorized by City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing the publishi ng of this Re solution once in a local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-136

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do h ereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adop ted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-137

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE , CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE NORTH CENTRAL ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025

The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafte r referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) for the district known and designated a s the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of Calif ornia, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and to prep are and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and,

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engine er’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and,

WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budg et items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within each Zone, as set forth in said Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE NORTH CENTRAL ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:

a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of M aintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District

2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report.

3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-137

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2024.

____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)

I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the Ci ty Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510

www.willdan.com

City of Roseville

North Central Roseville
Specific Plan
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2024/25 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: May 15, 2024
Public Hearing: June 5, 2024

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:

North Central Roseville Specific Plan
Landscaping and Lighting District

City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California

Dated this _____ day of _________, 2024.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Roseville

By: ________________________________
Mickey Ashley
Senior Project Analyst
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Stacee Reynolds
Principal Consultant
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION ..........................................2 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ..............................................3 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT .................................3 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE ...........5 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...................................................................... 7 A. GENERAL ............................................................................................................7 B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS ........................................................................7 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .......................9 D. INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR ...................................................10 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ............................................................................................12 A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET .......................................................................................12 B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES .............................................................12 C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION ...........................................13 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ..........................................................13 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN .........18 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ............................................................ 20 APPENDIX B — FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT ROLL .................................................. 24 DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1

I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the existing North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”) within the City. The District was formed in 1990. The District was formed and is lev ied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”).

This Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2024/25 (“Report”) describes the District, any annexations, changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. The maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements associated with specific areas of the City that provide a special benefit to the properties in that area are identified as Zones. The costs of the improvements and services are identified and budgeted separately for each Zone and ea ch parcel within a Zone is assessed proportionately for only those improvements and services that are a direct and special benefit to the properties within the Zone. The budgets and assessments are based on the estimated cost (considering historical costs) to maintain the District improvements that provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District.

The District consists of four landscaping benefit Zones:

• District Wide Benefit Zone
• Local Benefit Zone
• Zone F
• Zone G

In 2003 , the City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings, in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218, for the territory now known as Zones F & G. After the results of the ballots were tabulated, the City determined that a majority p rotest did not exist. The City then approved the annexation of Zones F and G, the maximum assessment rates, and annual inflationary adjustment factor.

In 2004, the City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings, in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218, to reengineer Zones A, B, C, D & E and approve the maximum assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment factor. After the r esults of the ballots were tabulated, the City determined that a majority protest did not exist. The City then approved the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for FY 2004/05 , which reconstituted the reengineered zones into the respective District Wide Benefit Zone or Local Benefit Zone.

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 Zones A, B, C, D and E were reengineered in order to more accurately identify the Zones and areas of special benefit within this portion of the District. These zones were combined into two new Zones based primarily on level of service, similarity of improvement types, and the proximity to improvements.

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will by resolution, order the improvements to be made, if any, and confirm the levy and collection of assessments pursuant to the Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District and respective Zones for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2024/25. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controll er to be included on the FY 2024/25 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be lev ied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rates approved by the City Council.

In compliance with the provisions of Proposition 218, property owner ballot proceedings have been conducted for all Zones within the District; such proceedings approved and confirmed the Maximum Assessments and the Inflationary Adjustment Factor as described in this Report.

The District and all Zones therein have been formed pursuant to the Act. Pursuant to the Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls.

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The District is located north of downtown Roseville between Interstate 80 and Washington Boulevard and generally encompasses the area within the North Central Roseville Specific Plan (“NCRSP”) and two small residential developments in close proximity to th e NCRSP near the corner of Diamond Oaks Road and Washington Boulevard. See Appendix A for District boundary map.

District Wide Zone This Zone includes all assessable property within the District with the exception of Zone F and Zone G.

Local Benefit Zone This Zone includes all single-family residential property within the District with the exception of Zone F and Zone G.

Zone F This Zone, which comprises the Diamond Oaks Unit No. 10 development, was created on January 8, 2003 through
Resolution 03-2 and was first levied in FY 2003/04. Zone F was comprised of Assessor Parcel Number (“APN”) 015 -
020-040 prior to being subdivided into 39 residential lots.

Zone G This Zone, which comprises the Diamond Oaks Unit No. 14 development, was created on May 28, 2003 through
Resolution 03-220 and was first levied in FY 2003/04. Zone G was comprised of APNs 017-041-034 & 015 -020-006
prior to being subdivided into 76 residential lots and 1 non- residential parcel.

D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:

• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
The District provides and ensures the continued maintenance, servicing, administration and operation of various landscaping and lighting improvements, and associated appurtenances that benefit parcels within the District. Services provided include all nece ssary service, operations, administration, and maintenance required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition.

Specific improvements include all ground cover, turf, shrubs, trees, gardens, play areas and play equipment, picnic areas, bike paths, pedestrian trails, walls and fences, park maintenance facilities, irrigation and drainage systems, graffiti removal, and associated appurtenances. Improvements in each Zone include:

District Wide Zone This Zone provides for the maintenance of landscaping , fences, sound walls and other improvements within the
arterial parkway right of ways , also described as scenic corridors, including but not limited to Roseville Parkway, Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Harding Boulevard and the east side of Washington Boulevard, pedestrian, and bike
pathways.

Local Benefit Zone This Zone provides for the maintenance of landscaping and other improvements within the local street right of ways .

This Zone is primarily a combination of the old Zone C and Zone D, which provided similar maintenance.

Zone F This Zone provides for the maintenance of parkway and perimeter landscaping and block wall adjacent to the
development on the west side of Diamond Oaks Road;
Parkway and perimeter landscaping, bike trails, block wall and wood fence adjacent to the development on the east
side of Washington Boulevard; Open Space designated as
Lot “B”, and; Landscaping within Lot “C”, “E” and “F” within the Diamond Oaks Unit No. 10 project.

Zone G This Zone provides for the maintenance of parkway and perimeter landscaping, bike path and masonry sound wall adjacent to the development on the south side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard; maintenance of parkway and perimeter
landscaping, bike path and masonry sound wall adjacent to the development on the west side of Washington Boulevard from Pleasant Grove Boulevard to Emerald Oak Road;
maintenance of the masonry sound wall on the western
perimeter of the development; installation and maintenance of pe rimeter landscaping on the west side of the
development located on Open Space Parcel C between
DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 Emerald Oak Road and the masonry sound wall adjacent
to the railroad right of way; and maintenance of Open
Space, cobble swale (Lot “B”) and post and cable fencing for Lots “A”, “B”, and “C” within the Diamond Oaks Unit No. 14 project.

All assessable parcels identified as being within each Zone share in both the cost and the benefits of the improvements. The costs associated with the improvements are equitably spread among all benefiting parcels within each Zone. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit from the improvements are asse ssed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. The funds collected from the assessments of each Zone a re to be expended only for the services and operations within each respective Zone.

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

The Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:

B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2(d) defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property -related service;”
Article XIIID Section 2(i) defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large .

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4 (a) defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be dete rmined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments. These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.

The City has initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218 for all Zones within the District. Each of the proposed improvements; the associated costs and assessments have been carefully reviewed, identified, and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID and the Act. All improvements associated with the Zones have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties to their full potential. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of t hose properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed parcel within these Zones receives special benefit from the improvements. The desirability and security of properties is enhanced by well - maintained landscaping in close proximity to those properties.

The special benefits associated with all landscaping improvements are specifically:

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 • Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the Zones through well -maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti. • Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

All of the preceding special benefits allow the property to be developed for the enjoyment of the property owners and contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the Zones.

The improvements are for the special benefit, enhancement, and use of properties within the Zones. Although the improvements include public easements, rights-of- way, streets, and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the construction and installation of these improvements are only necessary for the development of properties within the Zones and are not required nor necessarily desired by any properties o r developments outside the Zone’s boundaries.

Therefore, any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Zones or to the public at large. In making this determination, it should be noted that all parkway and perimeter landscaping within the City is both funded and maintained by a special district, individual property owners or through some type of association.

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Pursuant to the Act, the costs of each Zone may be apportioned by any formula or method that fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed, among all assessable parcels within the Zone in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements. The special benefit formula used for each Zone should reflect the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly proportion the Zone’s costs based on estimated special benefit to each parcel within the Zone. All assessable parcels within each Zone shall receive a direct special benefit from the services and improvements provided by the Zone.

Considering the composition of the parcels within the Zone, each parcel is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”), which reflects each parcel’s estimated special benefit from the improvements as compared to other parcels within the Zone. Because all assessable parcels within each Zone are considered to benefit from the Zone improvements on an EDU basis, the amounts to levy to each Zone are then spread to each assessable parcel within the Zone on an EDU method as shown in the table below . Acreage of common area parcels shall be apportioned to the remaining assessable parcels of a subdivision and/or parcel split(s) related to the creation of the common area parcel(s).

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 The following formulas are used to calculate the assessment for each parcel:

ASSIGNED EDU PROPERTY CLASS

1.0 per unit Single-Family Residential Parcels

0.6 per unit Multi-Family Residential Parcels

7.0 per acre Non-Residential Parcels

For each Zone, the Applied Assessment Rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for each parcel in the Zone is the result of dividing the total Balance to Levy for each Zone, by the sum of the Zone EDUs for the fiscal year. This Applied Assessment Rate is multiplied by each parcel’s individual EDU to determine the parcel’s levy amount. The assessment cannot be greater than the current maximum assessment rate, as adjusted for the inflation factor.

Total Balance to Levy / Total EDU = Rate per EDU

Parcel EDU x Rate per EDU = Parcel Levy Amount

D. INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
Any new or increase in assessments require certain noticing and meeting requirements by law. Prior to the passage of Proposition 218, legislative changes in the Ralph M. Brown Act (the “Brown Act”) defined a new or increased assessment to exclude certain conditions. These conditions include any assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed. This definition and conditions were later confirmed through Senate Bill 919 (the implementing legislation for Proposition 218).

The purpose of establishing an assessment range formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which could add to the District costs and assessments . As part of the District formation, balloting of property owners is required, pursuant to Proposition 218. The property owner ballots included an Assessment to be approved, as well as the approval of an assessment range formula.

The assessment range formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment (levy per unit or rate) for the current fiscal year is less than or equals to the “Maximum Assessment” (or “Adjusted Maximum Assessment”), then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The Maximum Assessment is equal to the initial Assessment approved by property owners adjusted annually by the following criteria:

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11

1. Beginning in the second fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment will be calculated.

2. The new Adjusted Maximum Assessment for the year represents the prior year’s approved Maximum Assessment increased by three percent (3.0%).

The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment less than or equal to this Maximum Assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

The approved base year maximum assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment factors for all Zones are shown in the table below:

Zone
Year of Approved
Maximum Rate and
Annual Inflator
(Base Year)
Maximum
Assessment
Rate per EDU
(Base Year)
Annual
Inflationary
Adjustment
Factor
District-Wide Benefit Zone FY 2004/05 $40.82 3.00%
Local Benefit Zone FY 2004/05 $43.92 3.00%
Zone F FY 2003/04 $481.35 3.00%
Zone G FY 2003/04 $264.22 3.00%

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2024/25 BUDGET

Fund balance information of each Zone is reported in Section C on the following page.

Total balance to levy for the district is $758,972.52.

B. FY 2024/25 ASSESSMENT RATES

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 C. FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS

Contract Maintenance – Landscaping – Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping improvements, irrigation, and related drainage systems, as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

Repair & Maintenance – Landscaping and Parks – Projected costs for repairs and/or maintenance of landscaping and park improvements are shown as separate budget items for each type of improvement. This would include work and materials not covered under contract maintenance such as repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance – Lighting – This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Repair & Maintenance – Tree Work – This line item includes annual costs for tree maintenance not included in the annual contract maintenance portion of the budget. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Utilities – The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

DRAFT –FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2024/25 North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 Maintenance – Bike Trails – Costs to perform the necessary maintenance of the bike trails within the District. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Maintenance – Open Space – Costs to perform the necessary maintenance of the open space areas within the District. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures – Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

ADMINISTRATION COSTS

City Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City Finance Department and other Departments in preparing the annual budget for the Engineer’s Report, together with other financial information required to determine the annual assessment. These costs would also include the preparation, posting and publishing of public notices required for City Council action relating to the District , as well as costs to perform legal review of documents.

Roseville City CouncilMay 15, 2024

Roseville City Council
May 15, 2024