As the duly authorized representative of the Applicant, I hereby certify that the Applicant has the legal authority to apply for federal assistance and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay any non-federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project described in this application, within prescribed timelines.
The requirements outlined in these assurances apply to Applicant and any of its subrecipients.
I further acknowledge that the Applicant is responsible for reviewing and adhering to all requirements within the:
(a) Applicable Federal Regulations (see below);
(b) Federal Program Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO); (c) Federal Preparedness Grants Manual;
(d) California Supplement to the NOFO; and
(e) Federal and State Grant Program Guidelines.
Federal Regulations
Government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements, and audit requirements for federal grant programs are set forth in Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). Updates are issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and can be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/.
In the event Cal OES determines that changes are necessary to the subaward after a subaward has been made, including changes to period of performance or terms and conditions, Applicants will be notified of the changes in writing. Once notification has been made, any subsequent request for funds will indicate Applicant acceptance of the changes to the subaward.
State and federal grant award requirements are set forth below. The Applicant hereby agrees to comply with the following:
1. Proof of Authority
The Applicant will obtain proof of authority from the city council, governing board, or authorized body in support of this project. This written authorization must specify that the Applicant and the city council, governing board, or authorized body agree:
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(a) To provide all matching funds required for the grant project and that any cash match will be appropriated as required;
(b) Any liability arising out of the performance of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the Applicant and the city council, governing board, or authorized body;
(c) Grant funds shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by the city council, governing board, or authorized body;
(d) The Applicant is authorized by the city council, governing board, or authorized body to apply for federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-federal share of project cost, if any) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application; and
(e) The official executing this agreement is authorized by the Applicant.
This Proof of Authority must be maintained on file and readily available upon request.
2. Period of Performance
The period of performance is specified in the Award. The Applicant is only authorized to perform allowable activities approved under the award, within the period of performance.
3. Lobbying and Political Activities
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), for persons entering into a contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement from an agency or requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the Applicant certifies that:
(a) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(b) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(c) The Applicant shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and discloseaccordingly.
The Applicant will also comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501- 1508 and §§ 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principle employment activities are funded in whole or in part with federal funds.
Finally, the Applicant agrees that federal funds will not be used, directly or indirectly, to support the enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy without the express written approval from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) or the federal awarding agency.
4. Debarment and Suspension
As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 C.F.R. § 200.214 and codified in 2 C.F.R. Part 180, Debarment and Suspension, the Applicant will provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the federal government. The Applicant certifies that it and its subrecipients:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (4)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transaction (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Where the Applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application.
5. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity
The Applicant will comply with all state and federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination, including:
(a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law (P.L.) 88-352 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et. seq.) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin and requires that recipients of federal financial assistance take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) to their programs and services;
(b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded educational program or activity;
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination against those with disabilities or access and functional needs; (d) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability and requires buildings and structures be accessible to those with disabilities and access and functional needs;
(e) Age Discrimination Act of 1975, (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107), whichprohibits discrimination on the basis of age;
(f) Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd—2), relating to confidentiality of patient records regarding substance abuse treatment; (g) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing as implemented by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at 24 C.F.R. Part100. The prohibition on disability discrimination includes the requirement that new multifamily housing with four or more dwelling units—i.e., the public and common use areas and individual apartment units (all units in buildings with elevators and ground-floor units in buildings without elevators)— Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
be designed and constructed with certain accessible features (See 24 C.F.R. § 100.201);
(h) Executive Order 11246, which prohibits federal contractors and federally assisted construction contractors and subcontractors, who do over $10,000 in Government business in one year from discriminating in employmentdecisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification or national origin;
(i) Executive Order 11375, which bans discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification, or national origin in hiring and employment in both the United States federal workforce and on the part of government contractors;
(j) California Public Contract Code § 10295.3, which prohibits discrimination based on domestic partnerships and those in same sex marriages; (k) Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy to ensure the equal treatment of faith-based organizations, under which the Applicant must comply with equal treatment policies and requirements contained in 6 C.F.R.
Part 19;
(l) The Applicant will comply with California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (California Government Code §§12940-12957), as applicable. FEHA prohibits harassment and discrimination in employment because of ancestry, familial status, race, color, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding), gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, mental and physical disability, genetic information, medical condition, age, pregnancy, denial of medical and family care leave, or pregnancy disability leave, military and veteran status, and/or retaliation for protesting illegal discrimination related to one of these categories, or for reporting patient abuse in tax supported institutions;
(m)Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for federal assistance is being made; and
(n) The requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) that may apply to this application.
6. Drug-Free Workplace
As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.),the Applicant certifies that it will maintain a drug-free workplace and a drug-free awareness program as outlined in the Act.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
7. Environmental Standards
The Applicant will comply with state and federal environmental standards, including:
(a) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177), to include coordination with the city or county planning agency;
(b) CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, §§ 15000-15387);
(c) Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), which establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters; (d) Federal Clean Air Act of 1955 (42 U.S.C. § 7401) which regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources;
(e) Institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (P.L. 91-190); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA; and Executive Order 12898 which focuses on the environmentaland human health effects of federal actions on minority and low-income populations with the goal of achieving environmental protection for all communities;
(f) Evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with Executive Order 11988;
(g) Executive Order 11514 which sets forth national environmental standards; (h) Executive Order 11738 instituted to assure that each federal agency empowered to enter into contracts for the procurement of goods, materials, or services and each federal agency empowered to extend federal assistance by way of grant, loan, or contract shall undertake such procurement and assistance activities in a manner that will result in effective enforcement of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Executive Order 11990 which requires preservation of wetlands;
(i) The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, (P.L. 93-523); (j) The Endangered Species Act of 1973, (P.L. 93-205);
(k) Assurance of project consistency with the approved state management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.);
(l) Conformity of Federal Actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); and
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(m) Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.
The Applicant shall not be: (1) in violation of any order or resolution promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution district; 2) subject to a cease-anddesist order pursuant to section 13301 of the California Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions; or 3) determined to be in violation of federal law relating to air or water pollution.
8. Audits
For subrecipients expending $750,000 or more in federal grant funds annually, the Applicant will perform the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and 2 C.F.R., Part 200, Subpart F Audit Requirements.
9. Cooperation and Access to Records
The Applicant must cooperate with any compliance reviews or investigations conducted by DHS. In accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.337, the Applicant will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the state, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award. The Applicant will require any subrecipients, contractors, successors, transferees and assignees to acknowledge and agree to comply with this provision.
10. Conflict of Interest
The Applicant will establish safeguards to prohibit the Applicant’s employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain.
11. Financial Management
False Claims for Payment - The Applicant will comply with 31 U.S.C §§ 3729-3733 which provides that Applicant shall not submit a false claim for payment, reimbursement, or advance.
12. Reporting - Accountability
The Applicant agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (P.L. 109-282), including but not limited to (a) the reporting of subawards obligating $30,000 or more in federal funds, Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
and (b) executive compensation data for first-tier subawards as set forth in 2 C.F.R.
Part 170, Appendix A. The Applicant also agrees to comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide financial assistance award term regarding the System for Award Management and Universal Identifier Requirements located at 2 C.F.R.
Part 25, Appendix A.
13. Whistleblower Protections
The Applicant must comply with statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. § 2409, 41 U.S.C. § 4712, and 10 U.S.C. § 2324, 41 U.S.C. § 4304 and § 4310.
14. Human Trafficking
The Applicant will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7104) which prohibits the Applicant or its subrecipients from: (1) engaging in trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect; (2) procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect; or (3) using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award.
15. Labor Standards
The Applicant will comply with the following federal labor standards:
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276a to 276a-7), as applicable, and the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145 and 18 U.S.C. § 874) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327-333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction contracts or subcontracts, and (b) The Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.) as they apply to employees of institutes of higher learning (IHE), hospitals and other nonprofit organizations.
16. Worker’s Compensation
The Applicant must comply with provisions which require every employer to be insured to protect workers who may be injured on the job at all times during the performance of the work of this Agreement, as per the workers compensation laws set forth in California Labor Code §§ 3700 et seq.
17. Property-Related
If applicable to the type of project funded by this federal award, the Applicant will:
(a) Comply with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of federal participation in purchase;
(b) Comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires federal award subrecipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more;
(c) Assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470), Executive Order 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16U.S.C. § 469a-1 et seq.); and
(d) Comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. § 4831 and 24 CFR Part 35) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.
18. Certifications Applicable Only to Federally-Funded Construction Projects For all construction projects, the Applicant will:
(a) Not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the federal awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project;
(b) Comply with the requirements of the awarding agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications; and (c) Provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the complete work conforms with the approved plans and specifications and will furnish progressive reports and such other information as may be required by the assistance awarding agency or State.
19. Use of Cellular Device While Driving is Prohibited
The Applicant is required to comply with California Vehicle Code sections 23123 and 23123.5. These laws prohibit driving motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
Drivers are also prohibited from the use of a wireless telephone without hands-free listening and talking, unless to make an emergency call to 911, law enforcement, or similar services.
20. California Public Records Act and Freedom of Information Act The Applicant acknowledges that all information submitted in the course of applying for funding under this program, or provided in the course of an entity’s grant management activities that are under Federal control, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the California Public Records Act, California Government Code §7920.000 et seq. The Applicant should consider these laws and consult its own State and local laws and regulations regarding the release of information when reporting sensitive matters in the grant application, needs assessment, and strategic planning process.
HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) –
PROGRAM SPECIFIC ASSURANCES / CERTIFICATIONS
21. Acknowledgment of Federal Funding from DHS
The Applicant must acknowledge its use of federal funding when issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid invitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with federal funds.
22. Activities Conducted Abroad
The Applicant must ensure that project activities carried on outside the United States are coordinated as necessary with appropriate government authorities and that appropriate licenses, permits, or approvals are obtained.
23. Best Practices for Collection and Use of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) DHS defines personally identifiable information (PII) as any information that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information that is linked or linkable to that individual. If the Applicant collectsPII, the Applicant is required to have a publicly-available privacy policy that describes standards on the usage and maintenance of PII they collect. The Applicant may refer to the DHS Privacy Impact Assessments: Privacy Guidance and Privacy template as a useful resource.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
24. Copyright
The Applicant must affix the applicable copyright notices of 17 U.S.C. §§ 401 or 402 and an acknowledgement of United States Government sponsorship (including the award number) to any work first produced under federal financial assistance awards.
25. Duplication of Benefits
Any cost allocable to a particular federal financial assistance award provided for in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart E may not be charged to other federal financial assistance awards to overcome fund deficiencies, to avoid restrictions imposed by federal statutes, regulations, or federal financial assistance award terms and conditions, or for other reasons. However, these prohibitions would not preclude the Applicant from shifting costs that are allowable under two or more awards in accordance with existing federal statutes, regulations, or the federal financial assistance award terms and conditions.
26. Energy Policy and Conservation Act
The Applicant must comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 6201 which contain policies relating to energy efficiency that are defined in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with this Act.
27. Federal Debt Status
The Applicant is required to be non-delinquent in its repayment of any federal debt.
Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowances, and benefit overpayments. See OMB Circular A-129.
28. Fly America Act of 1974
The Applicant must comply with Preference for United States Flag Air Carriers: (air carriers holding certificates under 49 U.S.C. § 41102) for international air transportation of people and property to the extent that such service is available, in accordance with the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 (49 U.S.C. § 40118) and the interpretative guidelines issued by the Comptroller General of the United States in the March 31, 1981, amendment to Comptroller General Decision B-138942.
29. Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990
In accordance with Section 6 of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, the Applicant must ensure that all conference, meeting, convention, or training space funded in whole or in part with federal funds complies with the fire prevention and control guidelines of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 2225a.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
30. Non-supplanting Requirement
If the Applicant receives federal financial assistance awards made under programs that prohibit supplanting by law, the Applicant must ensure that federal funds do not replace (supplant) funds that have been budgeted for the same purpose through non- federal sources.
31. Patents and Intellectual Property Rights
Unless otherwise provided by law, the Applicant is subject to the Bayh-Dole Act, Pub.
L. No. 96-517, as amended, and codified in 35 U.S.C. § 200 et seq. The Applicant is subject to the specific requirements governing the development, reporting, and disposition of rights to inventions and patents resulting from financial assistance awards located at 37 C.F.R. Part 401 and the standard patent rights clause located at 37 C.F.R. § 401.14.
32. SAFECOM
If the Applicant receives federal financial assistance awards made under programs that provide emergency communication equipment and its related activities, the Applicant must comply with the SAFECOM Guidance for Emergency Communication Grants, including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications.
33. Terrorist Financing
The Applicant must comply with Executive Order 13224 and United States law that prohibit transactions with, and the provisions of resources and support to, individuals and organizations associated with terrorism. The Applicant is legally responsible for ensuring compliance with the Order and laws.
34. Reporting of Matters Related to Recipient Integrity andPerformance If the total value of the Applicant’s currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all federal assistance offices exceeds $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of this federal financial assistance award, the Applicant must comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters located at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII, the full text of which is incorporated here by reference in the award terms and conditions.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
35. USA Patriot Act of 2001
The Applicant must comply with requirements of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act), which amends 18 U.S.C. §§ 175-175c.
36. Use of DHS Seal, Logo, and Flags
The Applicant must obtain permission from their DHS Financial Assistance Office, prior to using the DHS seal(s), logos, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials, including use of the United States Coast Guard seal, logo, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of Coast Guard officials.
37. Performance Goals
In addition to the Biannual Strategy Implementation Report submission requirements outlined in the Preparedness Grants Manual, the Applicant must demonstrate how the grant-funded project addresses the core capability gap associated with each project and identified in the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis or Stakeholder Preparedness Review or sustains existing capabilities, as applicable. The capability gap reduction or capability sustainment must be addressed in the Project Description of the BSIR for each project.
38. Applicability of DHS Standard Terms and Conditions to Tribes The DHS Standard Terms and Conditions are a restatement of general requirements imposed upon the Applicant and flow down to any of its subrecipients as a matter of law, regulation, or executive order. If the requirement does not apply to Indian tribes or there is a federal law or regulation exempting its application to Indian tribes, then the acceptance by Tribes of, or acquiescence to, DHS Standard Terms and Conditions does not change or alter its inapplicability to an Indian tribe. The execution of grant documents is not intended to change, alter, amend, or impose additional liability or responsibility upon the Tribe where it does not already exist.
39. Required Use of American Iron, Steel, Manufactured Products, and Construction Materials
The Applicant must comply with the “Build America, Buy America” Act (BABAA), enacted as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Executive Order 14005. Applicants receiving a federal award subject to BABAA requirements may not use federal financial assistance funds for infrastructure projects unless:
(a) All iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States – this means all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States; Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(b) All manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States – this means the manufactured product was manufactured in the United States; and the cost of the components of the manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured product has been established under applicable law or regulation; and
(c) All construction materials are manufactured in the United States – this means that all manufacturing processes for the construction material occurred in the United States.
The “Buy America” preference only applies to articles, materials, and supplies that are consumed in, incorporated into, or affixed to an infrastructure project. It does not apply to tools, equipment, and supplies, such as temporary scaffolding, brought to the construction site and removed at or before the completion of the infrastructure project. Nor does a “Buy America” preference apply to equipment and furnishings, such as movable chairs, desks, and portable computer equipment, that are used at or within the finished infrastructure project but are not an integral part of the structure or permanently affixed to the infrastructure project.
Per section 70914(c) of BABAA, FEMA may waive the application of a “Buy America” preference under an infrastructure program in certain cases.
On July 1, 2022, OMB approved FEMA’s General Applicability Public Interest Waiver of the BABAA requirements to be effective for a period of six months, through January 1, 2023. Applicants will not be required to follow the BABAA requirements for FEMA awards made, and any other funding FEMA obligates, during this waiver period. For any new awards FEMA makes after January 1, 2023, as well as new funding FEMA obligates to existing awards or through renewal awards where the new funding is obligated after January 1, 2023, Applicants will be required to follow the BABAA requirements unless another waiver is requested and approved.
40. Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practice to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
The Applicant must comply with the requirements of section 12(c) of Executive Order 14074. The Applicant is also encouraged to adopt and enforce policies consistent with Executive Order 14074 to support safe and effective policing.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
IMPORTANT
The purpose of these assurances is to obtain federal and state financial assistance, including any and all federal and state grants, loans, reimbursement, contracts, etc.
Applicant recognizes and agrees that state financial assistance will be extended based on the representations made in these assurances. These assurances are binding on Applicant, its successors, transferees, assignees, etc. as well as any of its subrecipients.
Failure to comply with any of the above assurances may result in suspension, termination, or reduction of grant funds.
All appropriate documentation, as outlined above, must be maintained on file by the Applicant and available for Cal OES or public scrutiny upon request. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the grant or termination of the grant or both and the Applicant may be ineligible for award of any future grants if Cal OES determines that the Applicant: (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.
All of the language contained within this document must be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers. Applicants are bound by DHS Standard Terms and Conditions 2023, Version 2, hereby incorporated by reference, which can be found at: https://www.dhs.gov/publication/fy15-dhs- standard-terms-and-conditions.
The undersigned represents that he/she is authorized to enter into this agreement for and on behalf of the Applicant.
Applicant:
Signature of Authorized Agent:
Printed Name of Authorized Agent:
Title: Date:
ORDINANCE NO. 6857
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Public Safety 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program (Fire).
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 12/1/2023
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project station 8
2270 6587 84001 700065 78,065 Increase Fire-2023 Homeland Security Grant PC 2023- 0042 Expense Budget
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 78,065
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2270 4401 84001 700065 78,065 Increase Fire-2023 Homeland Security Grant PC 2023- 0042 Reimbursement Budget
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 78,065
NET ADJUSTMENT -
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL -
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
Fire Department Staff recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project - the FY2023 Homeland Security Grant Program - Fire - PC2023-0042 Project (the "Project"), and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $78,065 in the Grants fund to the project for the purchase of a rail car emergency response kit and a chemical detector for the Type I Hazardous Materials Team.
Funding is provided by the Homeland Security Grant Program subaward 2023-0042-071 through the Placer County Office of Emergency Services. The Fire Department will receive full reimbursement for the purchase of $78,065, therefore, this budget adjustment will not affect the General Fund.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Katrina Rostam, Management Analyst II FISCAL YEAR: 2024-25 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Katrina Rostam, Management Analyst II COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 08/21/24 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Fire Department / Fire Administration ORDINANCE:
RESOLUTION NO. 24-304
ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville Police Department received $46,480 in grant funds from the United States Department of Homeland Security, as a sub-grantee through the Placer County Office of Emergency Services (subaward contract 2023-0042-0072), for the purchase of $5,490 in magnified optics equipment for the Rapid Containment Team, $2,990 in tactical medicine training for the Tactical Medicine Program, and $38,000 in night vision/VR equipment for SWAT team members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the City of Roseville accepts the grant award from the United States Department of Homeland Security, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any required documents.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as the grant recipient, the City of Roseville agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements related to the award.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 1 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
SUBAWARDEE GRANT AGREEMENT
CONTRACT NO: 2023-0042-072
DEPARTMENT: Placer County Office of Emergency Services
SUBAWARDEE: City of Roseville
SUBAWARDEE UEI #: W49TKZLUYCJ3
GRANT INFORMATION:
Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Subaward #2023-0042 Subaward Period: 09/01/2023 – 05/31/2026
Federal Grantor Agency – US Department of Homeland Security CFDA #97.067 Pass-through State Agency – California Office of Emergency Services FIPS #061-00000, Subaward #2023-0042
This Agreement is entered into as of the date last signed below (“Effective Date”) between the County of Placer, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter “County”) and City of Roseville hereinafter “SUBAWARDEE”, collectively “Parties”).
WHEREAS, County has been designated as the pass-through agent for the local administration of the State Homeland Security Grant Program (“SHSGP”) which consists of federally awarded funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) through the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (“CalOES”); and
WHEREAS, SUBAWARDEE submitted an application to County for an award of a portion of the SHSGP that has been awarded to County; and
WHEREAS, County has approved SUBAWARDEE’s application for such grant funds conditioned on SUBAWARDEE’s approval and execution of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to memorialize SUBAWARDEE’s legal obligations with respect to its use of the grant funds and its compliance with the terms and conditions of the SHSGP; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Placer County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 2022-128 (current HSGP GBR) dated June 21, 2022, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, the Assistant Director of the Placer County Office of Emergency Services (“PlacerOES”) has been authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of County; and WHEREAS, County and SUBAWARDEE desire to enter into this Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth, County and SUBAWARDEE agree as follows:
1. GRANT FUNDS & GRANT ACTIVITIES. SUBAWARDEE will utilize 2023 State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) grant funds (“Grant Funds”) only in the amount, type, and manner described in Exhibit A (“Scope of Grant Activities”). SUBAWARDEE will complete the tasks and/or activities in Exhibit A (“Grant Activities”) within the term of this Agreement.
PAGE 2 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement commences on the last date of execution of this Agreement and shall terminate on December 31, 2025 (December of year prior to closeout date).
3. SHSGP OBLIGATIONS.
A. Federal and State Requirements. The state and federal grant award requirements are provided in Exhibit B (“CalOES Standard Assurances”). SUBAWARDEE shall abide by all requirements therein, including:
i. The Department of Homeland Security Standard Terms and Conditions referenced therein.
ii. The requirement to provide proof in the form of a duly adopted resolution of the SUBAWARDEE’s governing body supporting the application and the proposed Grant Activities and identifying the individual who is authorized to execute this Agreement, which shall be provided as Exhibit D to this Agreement. iii. The requirement to adhere to government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements, and audit requirements provided in 2 CFR 200, as they may be updated from time to time by the federal Office of Management and Budget. iv. The requirement to adhere to all applicable federal regulations; the FEMA Notice of Funding Opportunity (“NOFO”); the FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual; the California Supplement to the NOFO; and federal and state grant program guidelines. v. The audit and access to records provisions, which require SUBAWARDEE to provide County, the Comptroller General of the Unities States, and, if appropriate, the state, with access to all records related to the Grant Funds.
B. Procurement. SUBAWARDEE’s systems for acquiring goods and services under this Agreement shall comply with applicable federal regulations. All contracts awarded by SUBAWARDEE related to this Agreement, including but not limited to those in amounts less than the simplified acquisition threshold, shall contain the provisions set forth in 2 CFR 200, as applicable.
C. Use of Grant Funds for Fee or Profit Prohibited. The use of Grant Funds for the payment of any fee or profit under a sub-award, as defined in 2 CFR 200 subpart A–E, is not allowable.
The term sub-award does not include the SUBAWARDEE’s procurement of goods and services needed to carry out Grant Activities.
D. Post-Award Requirements. SUBAWARDEE shall meet all closeout and continuing responsibilities, such as equipment tracking, monitoring, auditing, and records retention pursuant to the requirements in Exhibit B. SUBAWARDEE expressly agrees that use of the funds award is subject to single audit requirements pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F – Audit Requirements, Section 200.500.
E. Notification of Adverse Developments. The SUBAWARDEE shall notify County in writing of any developments that have a significant adverse impact on Grant Activities, as soon as reasonably practicable. This notification shall include a statement of the adverse issues, PAGE 3 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
impact expected, action taken or contemplated, and any assistance needed to resolve the situation.
F. Pre-award Costs. SUBAWARDEE may not incur pre-award costs prior to the effective date of this Agreement as determined by CalOES. If SUBAWARDEE chooses to incur pre-award costs, it is at SUBAWARDEE’s sole risk and shall not impose any obligation on County.
G. Unexpended Allocation. SUBAWARDEE is not authorized to carry forward any unexpended allocation of Grant Funds beyond the term of this Agreement. As soon as SUBAWARDEE is aware that Grant Funds will not be expended, SUBAWARDEE shall notify County in writing and return the unused allocation of Grant Funds to County.
H. Ownership of Work Product. All technical data, evaluations, plans, specifications, reports, documents, or other work products developed by SUBAWARDEE hereunder shall be the property of the federal government, state, and County and shall be delivered to County by SUBAWARDEE upon completion of the Grant Activities. SUBAWARDEE may retain copies thereof for its files and internal use. Publication of the information directly derived from work performed or data obtained in connection with services rendered under this Agreement must first be approved in writing by County and state as applicable.
I. Property. Title to all nonexpendable and expendable tangible personal property purchased by the SUBAWARDEE with Grant Funds shall be deemed to have vested in the SUBAWARDEE upon purchase, in accordance with the provisions of 2 CRF 200, without further obligation. Title to any federally owned property remains vested in the federal government. No real property may be acquired with Grant Funds.
J. Reports. SUBAWARDEE shall submit the following reports and/or information electronically to County:
i. Quarterly Status Report. This report form provided by County, is due 15 days after quarter end, shall keep the County informed of SUBAWARDEE activity and progress toward accomplishment of the objectives of the Grant Activities. ii. Equipment Tracking. SUBAWARDEE shall submit equipment information to County at least every 18 months, as required by 2 CFR 200. The equipment information must include a physical inventory report of all equipment that was purchased with the Grant Funds. SUBAWARDEE must report all equipment valued under $5,000 to County, and County approval is required to remove such equipment from the equipment inventory report. Equipment that is lost, stolen, or destroyed needs to be reported to County and may need to be replaced by SUBAWARDEE at SUBAWARDEE’s sole expense.
4. GRANT FUND PAYMENT.
A. County shall process SUBAWARDEE’s payment requests on a reimbursement basis. Grant Funds shall not be paid in advance. SUBAWARDEE shall submit payment requests quarterly, as provided below.
i. Quarter 1 (January–March): Payment request due April 15 PAGE 4 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
ii. Quarter 2 (April–June): Payment request July 15
iii. Quarter 3 (July–September): Payment request October 15 iv. Quarter 4 (October–December):Payment request January 15 With each payment request, SUBAWARDEE must provide supporting documentation reflecting actual costs incurred and associated Grant Activities performed and/or completed.
Failure to meet the above deadlines and/or provide supporting documentation may result in payment delays.
B. Each payment request must include a certification, signed by an official who is authorized to legally bind the SUBAWARDEE, which reads as follows:
“By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, and false claims otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729–3730 and 3801–3812).” C. County will review each payment request from SUBAWARDEE and, if approved, submit the request to CalOES on behalf of SUBAWARDEE. CalOES may submit the request to FEMA for approval.
D. SUBAWARDEE understands and acknowledges that County does not control either the process for approving payment requests submitted to CalOES or CalOES’s decision regarding the payment request. Responsibility for processing, approving, and making payment in connection with any payment request submitted by SUBAWARDEE lies exclusively with CalOES and County shall have no financial liability to SUBAWARDEE for CalOES’s failure to process, approve, or make payment in connection with any payment request.
E. If the County becomes aware of any deficiencies in the payment request, County shall communicate the deficiencies to the SUBAWARDEE along with the corrective action necessary to allow County to submit the payment request to CalOES. SUBAWARDEE shall be responsible for correcting any deficiencies in the request.
F. When County receives Grant Funds from CalOES, County will process payment of Grant Funds to SUBAWARDEE. Because of the multiple agencies involved in reviewing and approving these payment requests, payment processing may take up to twelve (12) months.
5. DISGORGEMENT. SUBAWARDEE understands and acknowledges that its failure to comply with the requirements of this Agreement, including but not limited to its failure to comply with the rules and regulations governing the use of Grant Funds, may result in an audit or monitoring of SUBAWARDEE’s use of the Grant Funds or SUBAWARDEE’s compliance with the rules and regulations governing its use of Grant Funds, or both, by FEMA or CalOES. SUBAWARDEE further understands and acknowledges that the result of any such audit may be a demand by FEMA, CalOES, and/or County that SUBAWARDEE repay (disgorge) some or all of the Grant Funds.
PAGE 5 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
SUBAWARDEE shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the County, its Board of Supervisors, officers, directors, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from a demand from FEMA or CalOES, or both, for repayment of some or all of the Grant Funds as a result of SUBAWARDEE’s failure to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement.
6. NOTICES. Any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or authorized under this Agreement shall be deemed to be properly given when:
A. Delivered personally to the person below, as of the date of delivery; or B. Mailed to the physical address listed below by U.S. Mail or similar service, with postage prepaid and properly addressed, as of the date of postmark; or C. Emailed to the email address(es) below, as of the date a read receipt, an acknowledgement from the recipient, or other proof of delivery is received by the sender.
In the case of County, to:
Name, Title: David Atkinson, Assistant Director of Emergency Services Address: 2968 Richardson Dr.
Auburn CA, 95603
Telephone: 530-886-5300
Email: [email protected]
In the case of SUBAWARDEE, to:
Name, Title: Dominick Casey, City Manager
Address: 311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Telephone: 916-774-5362
Email: [email protected]
7. TERMINATION AND ENFORCEMENT. This Agreement may be terminated by County if SUBAWARDEE materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions herein. Such termination shall be effective upon service of written notice of termination on SUBAWARDEE. As an alternative to termination, County may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, impose special conditions or take appropriate action as provided in 2 CFR 200 subpart D.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. SUBAWARDEE shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the County, its Board of Supervisors, officers, directors, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or related to this Agreement. This obligation to indemnify will survive termination of this Agreement.
9. EXHIBITS; MERGER CLAUSE; AMENDMENTS. This Agreement, including all Exhibits and Attachments, incorporated herein by this reference, constitutes the sole Agreement between the Parties and correctly states the rights, duties, and obligations of each party as of this document’s date. In the event that any term, condition, provision, requirement, or specification set forth in the body of this Agreement conflicts with or is inconsistent with any term, condition, provision, PAGE 6 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
requirement, or specification in any Exhibit and/or Attachment to this Agreement, the provisions of the body of the Agreement shall prevail. Any prior agreement, promises, negotiations, or representations between the parties not expressly stated in this document are not binding.
All subsequent modifications or amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by the parties.
10. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement is to be binding on the successors of the parties hereto. The services called for herein are deemed unique and SUBAWARDEE shall not assign, transfer, or otherwise substitute its interest in this Agreement.
11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. SUBAWARDEE certifies that it has no current business or financial relationship with any County employee or official, or other County contract provider that could create a conflict with this Agreement and will not enter into any such business or financial relationships during the period of this Agreement. SUBAWARDEE attests that its employees and the officers of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest, and that no officer or employee who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with this Agreement shall have any legally prohibited personal financial interest or benefit which either directly or indirectly arises out of this Agreement. SUBAWARDEE shall establish safeguards to prohibit employees or officers from using their positions for a purpose which could result in legally prohibited private gain or gives the appearance of being motivated for legally prohibited private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. SUBAWARDEE certifies that no official or employee of the County, nor any business entity in which an official of the County has an interest, has been employed or retained to solicit or aid in the procuring of this Agreement. In addition, SUBAWARDEE agrees that no such person will be employed in the performance of this Agreement without immediately notifying the County.
12. VALIDITY OF ALL PARTS OF THE AGREEMENT. Should any part of this Agreement be declared by a final decision by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond the authority of either party to enter into or carry out, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.
13. GOVERNING STATE LAWS AND JURISDICTION. This Agreement is executed and intended to be performed in the State of California, and the laws of that State shall govern its interpretation and effect. Any legal proceedings on this agreement shall be brought under the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the County of Placer, State of California. Each party waives any Federal court removal and/or original jurisdiction rights it may have.
14. WAIVERS IN PART. County’s waiver of the performance of any covenant, condition, obligation, representation, warranty or promise in this Agreement shall not invalidate this Agreement or be deemed a waiver of any other covenant, condition, obligation, representation, warranty or promise. County’s waiver of the time for performing any act or condition hereunder does not constitute a waiver of the act or condition itself.
15. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been prepared equally by both of the parties, and the Agreement and its individual provisions shall not be construed or interpreted more favorably for one party on the basis that the other party prepared it.
PAGE 7 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
16. DUPLICATE COUNTERPARTS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts. Each counterpart shall be an original and both together shall constitute but one and the same document. This Agreement shall not be deemed executed unless and until at least one counterpart bears the signatures of all parties’ designated signatories.
In addition, this Agreement and future documents relating to this Agreement may be digitally signed in accordance with California law. Any party to this Agreement may revoke such agreement to permit electronic signatures at any time in relation to all future documents by providing notice pursuant to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE (“SUBAWARDEE”) * COUNTY OF PLACER (“COUNTY”) _____________________________________
Signature
_____________________________________
David Atkinson, PE
Assistant Director of Emergency Services
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
_____________________________________
Print Name
Chair of the Board, President, or
Vice President
Date: _______________________________ Date: ______________________________ _____________________________________
Signature
Approved as to Form
Office of Placer County Counsel
_____________________________________
Print Name
_____________________________________
Secretary, Asst. Secretary,
Chief Financial Officer, or Asst.
Treasurer
Date: _______________________________
Date: ______________________________
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A: Scope of Grant Activities
Exhibit B: CalOES Standard Assurances
Exhibit C: County Resolution No. 2022-128
Exhibit D: SUBAWARDEE Resolution No. XXXXX
PAGE 8 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
PAGE 9 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF GRANT ACTIVITIES
See Attachment A
PAGE 10 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
EXHIBIT B
CalOES STANDARD ASSURANCES
See Attachment B
PAGE 11 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
EXHIBIT C
COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-128
See Attachment C
PAGE 12 OF 12
Placer County Office of Emergency Services
DHS Agreement with City of Roseville
EXHIBIT D
SUBAWARDEE RESOLUTION NO. XXXXX
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
As the duly authorized representative of the Applicant, I hereby certify that the Applicant has the legal authority to apply for federal assistance and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay any non-federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project described in this application, within prescribed timelines.
The requirements outlined in these assurances apply to Applicant and any of its subrecipients.
I further acknowledge that the Applicant is responsible for reviewing and adhering to all requirements within the:
(a) Applicable Federal Regulations (see below);
(b) Federal Program Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO); (c) Federal Preparedness Grants Manual;
(d) California Supplement to the NOFO; and
(e) Federal and State Grant Program Guidelines.
Federal Regulations
Government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements, and audit requirements for federal grant programs are set forth in Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). Updates are issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and can be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/.
In the event Cal OES determines that changes are necessary to the subaward after a subaward has been made, including changes to period of performance or terms and conditions, Applicants will be notified of the changes in writing. Once notification has been made, any subsequent request for funds will indicate Applicant acceptance of the changes to the subaward.
State and federal grant award requirements are set forth below. The Applicant hereby agrees to comply with the following:
1. Proof of Authority
The Applicant will obtain proof of authority from the city council, governing board, or authorized body in support of this project. This written authorization must specify that the Applicant and the city council, governing board, or authorized body agree:
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(a) To provide all matching funds required for the grant project and that any cash match will be appropriated as required;
(b) Any liability arising out of the performance of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the Applicant and the city council, governing board, or authorized body;
(c) Grant funds shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by the city council, governing board, or authorized body;
(d) The Applicant is authorized by the city council, governing board, or authorized body to apply for federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-federal share of project cost, if any) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application; and
(e) The official executing this agreement is authorized by the Applicant.
This Proof of Authority must be maintained on file and readily available upon request.
2. Period of Performance
The period of performance is specified in the Award. The Applicant is only authorized to perform allowable activities approved under the award, within the period of performance.
3. Lobbying and Political Activities
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), for persons entering into a contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement from an agency or requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the Applicant certifies that:
(a) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(b) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(c) The Applicant shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and discloseaccordingly.
The Applicant will also comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501- 1508 and §§ 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principle employment activities are funded in whole or in part with federal funds.
Finally, the Applicant agrees that federal funds will not be used, directly or indirectly, to support the enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy without the express written approval from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) or the federal awarding agency.
4. Debarment and Suspension
As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 C.F.R. § 200.214 and codified in 2 C.F.R. Part 180, Debarment and Suspension, the Applicant will provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the federal government. The Applicant certifies that it and its subrecipients:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (4)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transaction (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Where the Applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application.
5. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity
The Applicant will comply with all state and federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination, including:
(a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law (P.L.) 88-352 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et. seq.) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin and requires that recipients of federal financial assistance take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) to their programs and services;
(b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded educational program or activity;
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination against those with disabilities or access and functional needs; (d) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability and requires buildings and structures be accessible to those with disabilities and access and functional needs;
(e) Age Discrimination Act of 1975, (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107), whichprohibits discrimination on the basis of age;
(f) Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd—2), relating to confidentiality of patient records regarding substance abuse treatment; (g) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing as implemented by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at 24 C.F.R. Part100. The prohibition on disability discrimination includes the requirement that new multifamily housing with four or more dwelling units—i.e., the public and common use areas and individual apartment units (all units in buildings with elevators and ground-floor units in buildings without elevators)— Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
be designed and constructed with certain accessible features (See 24 C.F.R. § 100.201);
(h) Executive Order 11246, which prohibits federal contractors and federally assisted construction contractors and subcontractors, who do over $10,000 in Government business in one year from discriminating in employmentdecisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification or national origin;
(i) Executive Order 11375, which bans discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification, or national origin in hiring and employment in both the United States federal workforce and on the part of government contractors;
(j) California Public Contract Code § 10295.3, which prohibits discrimination based on domestic partnerships and those in same sex marriages; (k) Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy to ensure the equal treatment of faith-based organizations, under which the Applicant must comply with equal treatment policies and requirements contained in 6 C.F.R.
Part 19;
(l) The Applicant will comply with California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (California Government Code §§12940-12957), as applicable. FEHA prohibits harassment and discrimination in employment because of ancestry, familial status, race, color, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding), gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, mental and physical disability, genetic information, medical condition, age, pregnancy, denial of medical and family care leave, or pregnancy disability leave, military and veteran status, and/or retaliation for protesting illegal discrimination related to one of these categories, or for reporting patient abuse in tax supported institutions;
(m)Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for federal assistance is being made; and
(n) The requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) that may apply to this application.
6. Drug-Free Workplace
As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.),the Applicant certifies that it will maintain a drug-free workplace and a drug-free awareness program as outlined in the Act.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
7. Environmental Standards
The Applicant will comply with state and federal environmental standards, including:
(a) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177), to include coordination with the city or county planning agency;
(b) CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, §§ 15000-15387);
(c) Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), which establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters; (d) Federal Clean Air Act of 1955 (42 U.S.C. § 7401) which regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources;
(e) Institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (P.L. 91-190); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA; and Executive Order 12898 which focuses on the environmentaland human health effects of federal actions on minority and low-income populations with the goal of achieving environmental protection for all communities;
(f) Evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with Executive Order 11988;
(g) Executive Order 11514 which sets forth national environmental standards; (h) Executive Order 11738 instituted to assure that each federal agency empowered to enter into contracts for the procurement of goods, materials, or services and each federal agency empowered to extend federal assistance by way of grant, loan, or contract shall undertake such procurement and assistance activities in a manner that will result in effective enforcement of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Executive Order 11990 which requires preservation of wetlands;
(i) The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, (P.L. 93-523); (j) The Endangered Species Act of 1973, (P.L. 93-205);
(k) Assurance of project consistency with the approved state management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.);
(l) Conformity of Federal Actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); and
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(m) Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.
The Applicant shall not be: (1) in violation of any order or resolution promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution district; 2) subject to a cease-anddesist order pursuant to section 13301 of the California Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions; or 3) determined to be in violation of federal law relating to air or water pollution.
8. Audits
For subrecipients expending $750,000 or more in federal grant funds annually, the Applicant will perform the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and 2 C.F.R., Part 200, Subpart F Audit Requirements.
9. Cooperation and Access to Records
The Applicant must cooperate with any compliance reviews or investigations conducted by DHS. In accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.337, the Applicant will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the state, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award. The Applicant will require any subrecipients, contractors, successors, transferees and assignees to acknowledge and agree to comply with this provision.
10. Conflict of Interest
The Applicant will establish safeguards to prohibit the Applicant’s employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain.
11. Financial Management
False Claims for Payment - The Applicant will comply with 31 U.S.C §§ 3729-3733 which provides that Applicant shall not submit a false claim for payment, reimbursement, or advance.
12. Reporting - Accountability
The Applicant agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (P.L. 109-282), including but not limited to (a) the reporting of subawards obligating $30,000 or more in federal funds, Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
and (b) executive compensation data for first-tier subawards as set forth in 2 C.F.R.
Part 170, Appendix A. The Applicant also agrees to comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide financial assistance award term regarding the System for Award Management and Universal Identifier Requirements located at 2 C.F.R.
Part 25, Appendix A.
13. Whistleblower Protections
The Applicant must comply with statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. § 2409, 41 U.S.C. § 4712, and 10 U.S.C. § 2324, 41 U.S.C. § 4304 and § 4310.
14. Human Trafficking
The Applicant will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7104) which prohibits the Applicant or its subrecipients from: (1) engaging in trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect; (2) procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect; or (3) using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award.
15. Labor Standards
The Applicant will comply with the following federal labor standards:
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276a to 276a-7), as applicable, and the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145 and 18 U.S.C. § 874) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327-333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction contracts or subcontracts, and (b) The Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.) as they apply to employees of institutes of higher learning (IHE), hospitals and other nonprofit organizations.
16. Worker’s Compensation
The Applicant must comply with provisions which require every employer to be insured to protect workers who may be injured on the job at all times during the performance of the work of this Agreement, as per the workers compensation laws set forth in California Labor Code §§ 3700 et seq.
17. Property-Related
If applicable to the type of project funded by this federal award, the Applicant will:
(a) Comply with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of federal participation in purchase;
(b) Comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires federal award subrecipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more;
(c) Assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470), Executive Order 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16U.S.C. § 469a-1 et seq.); and
(d) Comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. § 4831 and 24 CFR Part 35) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.
18. Certifications Applicable Only to Federally-Funded Construction Projects For all construction projects, the Applicant will:
(a) Not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the federal awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project;
(b) Comply with the requirements of the awarding agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications; and (c) Provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the complete work conforms with the approved plans and specifications and will furnish progressive reports and such other information as may be required by the assistance awarding agency or State.
19. Use of Cellular Device While Driving is Prohibited
The Applicant is required to comply with California Vehicle Code sections 23123 and 23123.5. These laws prohibit driving motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
Drivers are also prohibited from the use of a wireless telephone without hands-free listening and talking, unless to make an emergency call to 911, law enforcement, or similar services.
20. California Public Records Act and Freedom of Information Act The Applicant acknowledges that all information submitted in the course of applying for funding under this program, or provided in the course of an entity’s grant management activities that are under Federal control, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the California Public Records Act, California Government Code §7920.000 et seq. The Applicant should consider these laws and consult its own State and local laws and regulations regarding the release of information when reporting sensitive matters in the grant application, needs assessment, and strategic planning process.
HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) –
PROGRAM SPECIFIC ASSURANCES / CERTIFICATIONS
21. Acknowledgment of Federal Funding from DHS
The Applicant must acknowledge its use of federal funding when issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid invitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with federal funds.
22. Activities Conducted Abroad
The Applicant must ensure that project activities carried on outside the United States are coordinated as necessary with appropriate government authorities and that appropriate licenses, permits, or approvals are obtained.
23. Best Practices for Collection and Use of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) DHS defines personally identifiable information (PII) as any information that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information that is linked or linkable to that individual. If the Applicant collectsPII, the Applicant is required to have a publicly-available privacy policy that describes standards on the usage and maintenance of PII they collect. The Applicant may refer to the DHS Privacy Impact Assessments: Privacy Guidance and Privacy template as a useful resource.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
24. Copyright
The Applicant must affix the applicable copyright notices of 17 U.S.C. §§ 401 or 402 and an acknowledgement of United States Government sponsorship (including the award number) to any work first produced under federal financial assistance awards.
25. Duplication of Benefits
Any cost allocable to a particular federal financial assistance award provided for in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart E may not be charged to other federal financial assistance awards to overcome fund deficiencies, to avoid restrictions imposed by federal statutes, regulations, or federal financial assistance award terms and conditions, or for other reasons. However, these prohibitions would not preclude the Applicant from shifting costs that are allowable under two or more awards in accordance with existing federal statutes, regulations, or the federal financial assistance award terms and conditions.
26. Energy Policy and Conservation Act
The Applicant must comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 6201 which contain policies relating to energy efficiency that are defined in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with this Act.
27. Federal Debt Status
The Applicant is required to be non-delinquent in its repayment of any federal debt.
Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowances, and benefit overpayments. See OMB Circular A-129.
28. Fly America Act of 1974
The Applicant must comply with Preference for United States Flag Air Carriers: (air carriers holding certificates under 49 U.S.C. § 41102) for international air transportation of people and property to the extent that such service is available, in accordance with the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 (49 U.S.C. § 40118) and the interpretative guidelines issued by the Comptroller General of the United States in the March 31, 1981, amendment to Comptroller General Decision B-138942.
29. Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990
In accordance with Section 6 of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, the Applicant must ensure that all conference, meeting, convention, or training space funded in whole or in part with federal funds complies with the fire prevention and control guidelines of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 2225a.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
30. Non-supplanting Requirement
If the Applicant receives federal financial assistance awards made under programs that prohibit supplanting by law, the Applicant must ensure that federal funds do not replace (supplant) funds that have been budgeted for the same purpose through non- federal sources.
31. Patents and Intellectual Property Rights
Unless otherwise provided by law, the Applicant is subject to the Bayh-Dole Act, Pub.
L. No. 96-517, as amended, and codified in 35 U.S.C. § 200 et seq. The Applicant is subject to the specific requirements governing the development, reporting, and disposition of rights to inventions and patents resulting from financial assistance awards located at 37 C.F.R. Part 401 and the standard patent rights clause located at 37 C.F.R. § 401.14.
32. SAFECOM
If the Applicant receives federal financial assistance awards made under programs that provide emergency communication equipment and its related activities, the Applicant must comply with the SAFECOM Guidance for Emergency Communication Grants, including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications.
33. Terrorist Financing
The Applicant must comply with Executive Order 13224 and United States law that prohibit transactions with, and the provisions of resources and support to, individuals and organizations associated with terrorism. The Applicant is legally responsible for ensuring compliance with the Order and laws.
34. Reporting of Matters Related to Recipient Integrity andPerformance If the total value of the Applicant’s currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all federal assistance offices exceeds $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of this federal financial assistance award, the Applicant must comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters located at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII, the full text of which is incorporated here by reference in the award terms and conditions.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
35. USA Patriot Act of 2001
The Applicant must comply with requirements of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act), which amends 18 U.S.C. §§ 175-175c.
36. Use of DHS Seal, Logo, and Flags
The Applicant must obtain permission from their DHS Financial Assistance Office, prior to using the DHS seal(s), logos, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials, including use of the United States Coast Guard seal, logo, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of Coast Guard officials.
37. Performance Goals
In addition to the Biannual Strategy Implementation Report submission requirements outlined in the Preparedness Grants Manual, the Applicant must demonstrate how the grant-funded project addresses the core capability gap associated with each project and identified in the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis or Stakeholder Preparedness Review or sustains existing capabilities, as applicable. The capability gap reduction or capability sustainment must be addressed in the Project Description of the BSIR for each project.
38. Applicability of DHS Standard Terms and Conditions to Tribes The DHS Standard Terms and Conditions are a restatement of general requirements imposed upon the Applicant and flow down to any of its subrecipients as a matter of law, regulation, or executive order. If the requirement does not apply to Indian tribes or there is a federal law or regulation exempting its application to Indian tribes, then the acceptance by Tribes of, or acquiescence to, DHS Standard Terms and Conditions does not change or alter its inapplicability to an Indian tribe. The execution of grant documents is not intended to change, alter, amend, or impose additional liability or responsibility upon the Tribe where it does not already exist.
39. Required Use of American Iron, Steel, Manufactured Products, and Construction Materials
The Applicant must comply with the “Build America, Buy America” Act (BABAA), enacted as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Executive Order 14005. Applicants receiving a federal award subject to BABAA requirements may not use federal financial assistance funds for infrastructure projects unless:
(a) All iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States – this means all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States; Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
(b) All manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States – this means the manufactured product was manufactured in the United States; and the cost of the components of the manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured product has been established under applicable law or regulation; and
(c) All construction materials are manufactured in the United States – this means that all manufacturing processes for the construction material occurred in the United States.
The “Buy America” preference only applies to articles, materials, and supplies that are consumed in, incorporated into, or affixed to an infrastructure project. It does not apply to tools, equipment, and supplies, such as temporary scaffolding, brought to the construction site and removed at or before the completion of the infrastructure project. Nor does a “Buy America” preference apply to equipment and furnishings, such as movable chairs, desks, and portable computer equipment, that are used at or within the finished infrastructure project but are not an integral part of the structure or permanently affixed to the infrastructure project.
Per section 70914(c) of BABAA, FEMA may waive the application of a “Buy America” preference under an infrastructure program in certain cases.
On July 1, 2022, OMB approved FEMA’s General Applicability Public Interest Waiver of the BABAA requirements to be effective for a period of six months, through January 1, 2023. Applicants will not be required to follow the BABAA requirements for FEMA awards made, and any other funding FEMA obligates, during this waiver period. For any new awards FEMA makes after January 1, 2023, as well as new funding FEMA obligates to existing awards or through renewal awards where the new funding is obligated after January 1, 2023, Applicants will be required to follow the BABAA requirements unless another waiver is requested and approved.
40. Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practice to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
The Applicant must comply with the requirements of section 12(c) of Executive Order 14074. The Applicant is also encouraged to adopt and enforce policies consistent with Executive Order 14074 to support safe and effective policing.
Standard Assurances
For Cal OES Federal Non-Disaster Grant Programs
IMPORTANT
The purpose of these assurances is to obtain federal and state financial assistance, including any and all federal and state grants, loans, reimbursement, contracts, etc.
Applicant recognizes and agrees that state financial assistance will be extended based on the representations made in these assurances. These assurances are binding on Applicant, its successors, transferees, assignees, etc. as well as any of its subrecipients.
Failure to comply with any of the above assurances may result in suspension, termination, or reduction of grant funds.
All appropriate documentation, as outlined above, must be maintained on file by the Applicant and available for Cal OES or public scrutiny upon request. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the grant or termination of the grant or both and the Applicant may be ineligible for award of any future grants if Cal OES determines that the Applicant: (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.
All of the language contained within this document must be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers. Applicants are bound by DHS Standard Terms and Conditions 2023, Version 2, hereby incorporated by reference, which can be found at: https://www.dhs.gov/publication/fy15-dhs- standard-terms-and-conditions.
The undersigned represents that he/she is authorized to enter into this agreement for and on behalf of the Applicant.
Applicant:
Signature of Authorized Agent:
Printed Name of Authorized Agent:
Title: Date:
ORDINANCE NO. 6858
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Public Safety 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program (Police).
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2270 6587 84001 700067 43,490 Increase to Capital Outlay - Equipment for Magnified Optics & Night/Infrared equipment
2270 5461 84001 700067 2,990 Increase to Training and Development for Tactical Medicine training
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 46,480
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2270 4401 84001 700067 46,480 Increase to 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program revenue budget
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 46,480
NET ADJUSTMENT -
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL -
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
Staff recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project - the FY2023 Homeland Security Grant Program - Police Project (the "Project"), and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $46,480 in the Grants fund to the project for the purchase of magnified optics and night/infrared equipment for the department's SWAT Team and to send members to a tactical medicine training course. The Police Department has been given approval from Placer County Office of Emergency Services (OES) to purchase equipment with funding allocated from the federal Homeland Security Grant Program. Placer County OES administers the grant, files reimbursement claims from the federal government, and then distributes the reimbursement to local agencies. This budget adjustment will not have an impact on the General Fund.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Mark Peinado / Management Analyst FISCAL YEAR: 2024-25 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Mark Peinado / Management Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 08/21/24 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Police Department ORDINANCE:
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3505
File #: 0800-05
Title:
Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/21/2024
Item #: 7.20.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve award of the East Site Construction RFQ to the lowest responsible bidder, SLC, Inc.; 2) Adopt a resolution to approve an agreement with SLC, Inc. for the Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower project, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City, and authorize a 15% contingency to cover costs of unanticipated changes to scope or schedule and ensure successful completion of the project; and
3) Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $1,287,594 to provide adequate funding to pay for all costs including equipment and services beyond site construction.
BACKGROUND
Radio transmission is the primary communication method for the City’s emergency services and many of the daily operations providers (i.e., Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks, Recreation and Libraries, Roseville Electric, Roseville Transit, and Environmental Utilities), as well as outside agencies during mutual aid incidents. The City’s radio system handles approximately 1.5 million transmissions per year and therefore ensuring adequate coverage throughout the City is crucial.
Roseville currently operates two other 180-foot radio communications towers. One is in west Roseville near the Roseville Energy Park and the second is in central Roseville at the Police Department building on Junction Boulevard. The east side of Roseville is currently served by radio equipment located on the 3rd floor of a commercial building in a leased electrical closet. As previously described to City Council at the September 7, 2022 meeting, the current east radio site has many limitations and needs to be relocated to a new site that will improve its reliability, availability, capacity and coverage. The City’s Information Technology and Economic Development staff coordinated the efforts to explore opportunities to provide enhanced radio coverage on the east side of Roseville. Following an extensive evaluation, the City-owned 2001 Strauch Drive site was chosen for the location of a new radio communications facility to accommodate the relocated equipment.
Consultants were acquired to develop plans for the 2001 Strauch Drive site and completed the required environmental clearance. On September 7, 2022, Council adopted the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), IS/MND Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP), and approved agreements for acquisition of permanent and temporary easements allowing access to the site. Subsequent to Council’s action, the easements have been acquired and the plans submitted for building and civil improvement permits. On December 6, 2023 Council provided approval to accept the project’s plans and specifications as well as proceed with a call for construction bids.
The proposed East Site Radio Communications Relocation Project facility will include a 180-foot radio communication tower, an equipment shelter, backup generator, propane tank to service the generator, security cameras and lighting, a graveled chain link fence enclosure area, and an access road via the adjacent commercial center at 1700 Rocky Ridge Drive. The plans and specifications for the project are attached in the Project Manual.
Public outreach on this project has occurred in several ways. News of the project was previously provided in the various City news outlets including the City’s website, emailed in the City News and Business Matters newsletters, and posted on the City’s Twitter and Facebook pages. Postcards were sent out to the Sierra Gardens (inactive) neighborhood property owners and an article was published in the adjacent Maidu Neighborhood Association newsletter. City staff also presented the project at a RCONA Board meeting and a Maidu Neighborhood Association meeting prior to the September 2022 Council hearing. Additionally, the required CEQA noticing was provided to owners and tenants of properties within 500 feet of the project site. The project has also been added to the list of Current Projects on the City’s website and signage identifying the future communications tower has been posted on the project site.
Installation of a new radio communications site in the east side of Roseville is essential to support emergency services and daily operations. Staff anticipates construction could begin in late summer 2024, dependent on weather, availability of materials and contractor schedules. Once the project has been completed, IT staff will coordinate transfer and optimization of the existing radio communications equipment to the new location on the tower and within the equipment shelter.
FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment is needed to increase the budget for the East Radio Site Communications Tower project. The project scope consists of site construction, tower, shelter, generator, propane tank, grounding, tree removal, bird survey, United Auburn Indian Council observation, City staff labor, fiber connectivity, power, cameras, lights, network equipment, spectrum analyzer, antenna systems, microwave dish link to the PD site, new radio equipment, system simulcast alignment, decommissioning of the old East radio site and a 15% contingency to ensure successful site construction and optimization.
The existing project budget of $1,677,712 is funded by the Strategic Improvement Fund, the Public Facilities Fund, and the Information Technology Replacement Fund. The $1,287,594 budget adjustment is funded by an increase of $462,092 from the Strategic Improvement Fund and $825,502 from the Information Technology Replacement Fund, bringing the revised project budget to $2,965,306. Adequate funds are available in both the IT Replacement and Strategic Improvement Funds. Once the project is complete, the ongoing site maintenance will be included in the annual Information Technology Operations Fund budget.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council approval of construction is an action that is subject to CEQA. Project level CEQA compliance for the (Citywide) East Site Radio Communications Relocation Project was accomplished with preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), adopted by City Council on September 7, 2022 (SCH No. 2022070353).
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C: Maintain Safe and Healthy Communities – Providing a connected and reliable radio communication service for the east side of Roseville supports emergency and daily operations in the City and assists in maintaining a safe and healthy community.
Goal E: Deliver Exceptional City Services – Many City services (i.e., Police, Fire, Utilities, Transit, etc.) depend daily on the radio system for efficient and effective communications as part of each department’s service delivery.
Goal F: Invest in Well-Planned Infrastructure and Growth – This site is an investment in the City’s technological infrastructure and will be scalable for future growth.
Respectfully Submitted,
Karl Grover, Information Technology Program Manager
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-302
Agreement
Project Manual- 1a
Project Manual - 1b
Project Manual - 2
Project Manual - 3
Project Manual - 4
Project Manual - 5
Ordinance 6856
RESOLUTION NO. 24-302
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SLC, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Agreement for the Citywide East Site Radio Communications Tower project, by and between the City of Roseville and SLC, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville, upon receipt and approval of the required bonds by the City Attorney’s office.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the contract price.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[C:\Users\jessi\Box\Prevailing Wage\City of Roseville\City of Roseville_Office\project manual agreement - SLC Inc - Citwide East Site Radio Communication Tower_08-06-24_REV.docx; 8/7/2024]
A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this 6th day of August, 2024, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, (“CITY”), and SLC, Inc._______________________________________, a
_____Corporation________________________, (“CONTRACTOR”); and W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the CITY, at a meeting held on the 24th day of August, 2024, approved plans and specifications for the _________________ _____Citywide East Site Radio Communication Tower – Re-bid (Construction)___________ and directed the City Clerk to advertise for sealed proposals for doing said work and providing that bids be submitted on the __13th___ day of _May___________, 20__24___; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk, thereafter duly and regularly caused a notice to be published in the manner and for the time prescribed by law; and
WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR, pursuant to the provisions of said notice duly filed a bid with the City Clerk, a true copy of which bid is now on file in the office of the City Clerk, and is hereby referred to and by this reference made a part hereof as fully as if set forth at length herein; and
WHEREAS, all bids received pursuant to said notice were opened and examined and publicly declared at the time specified in said advertisement for bids and at a meeting of the City Council held on the 24th day of August 2024, the Council found and declared the bid of 2 [C:\Users\jessi\Box\Prevailing Wage\City of Roseville\City of Roseville_Office\project manual agreement - SLC Inc - Citwide East Site Radio Communication Tower_08-06-24_REV.docx; 8/7/2024]
CONTRACTOR to be the lowest responsible bid and thereupon awarded a contract to CONTRACTOR to do the work referred to in the aforementioned specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. THE WORK. CONTRACTOR agrees:
a. To do the work and furnish all the labor, materials, tools, supplies, equipment, superintendence, insurance, and bonds required for the __construction of the Citywide East Site Radio Communication Tower – based on the specifications and addenda issued as part of the re-bid RFQ# 15-022__________________________________________ in accordance with the Contract Documents (the Work).
b. To do and perform the Work contemplated hereby in a good and workmanlike manner under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Roseville.
2. PAYMENT. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR __Nine hundred twenty-five thousand, twenty-eight and (00/100)_______________________________________________ dollars ($_925,028.00_____) for the Work to be done under this Agreement in accordance with the Contract Documents.
3. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Agreement between the parties hereto consists of the following documents:
a. The advertisement for bids (including the notice to bidders, instructions to bidders and proposals);
b. The accepted bid;
3 [C:\Users\jessi\Box\Prevailing Wage\City of Roseville\City of Roseville_Office\project manual agreement - SLC Inc - Citwide East Site Radio Communication Tower_08-06-24_REV.docx; 8/7/2024]
c. Plans and specifications (including standard construction specifications, special provisions and construction details);
d. Bonds and insurance required by the specifications; and e. This contract.
All documents specified above are intended to operate so that any work called for in any one and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents.
4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. In the event CONTRACTOR does not complete the Work within the time specified, CONTRACTOR agrees that CITY will suffer damages.
Inasmuch as the actual damages which would result from such breach by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement are uncertain, and would be impractical or extremely difficult to fix, CONTRACTOR agrees that it shall pay, or CITY shall deduct from CONTRACTOR’s fee, the amount of $__3,000__ per day as liquidated damages, in the event of such delay.
5. TIME OF COMPLETION. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall complete all Work under the Contract Documents within _180__ Days of the date of this Contract. CONTRACTOR shall begin work by the date specified in the “Notice to Proceed” letter and shall diligently prosecute all of the Work under this Contract in all parts and requirements as defined in the Contract Documents.
6. SERVICE OF NOTICE. Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed given when (a) personally delivered to the recipient identified below; (b) mailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage pre-paid, to the address specified below; or (c) sent by facsimile, with confirmation of receipt, to the facsimile number identified below.
4 [C:\Users\jessi\Box\Prevailing Wage\City of Roseville\City of Roseville_Office\project manual agreement - SLC Inc - Citwide East Site Radio Communication Tower_08-06-24_REV.docx; 8/7/2024]
CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONTRACTOR
_Andre Baranov_________________ __SLC Inc. __________________ _2005 Hilltop Circle______________ Chad Mathisen ______________ _Roseville, CA 95747_____________ __871 Cotting Court Suite I _____ [email protected]_____ __Vacaville, CA 95688_________ _(916) 774-5342_________________ [email protected]_____________ ___(916) 759-5781_____________
CITY may also act through either its architect or construction manager if CITY expressly gives notice to CONTRACTOR, in writing, that CITY’s designee has authority to act for CITY in a specific capacity.
7. DISPUTES. Disputes arising from this Agreement will be determined in accordance with the Contract Documents and Public Contract Code Sections 10240-10240.13.
8. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.
10. SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.
11. MODIFICATION. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.
12. SEVERABILITY. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole. 5 [C:\Users\jessi\Box\Prevailing Wage\City of Roseville\City of Roseville_Office\project manual agreement - SLC Inc - Citwide East Site Radio Communication Tower_08-06-24_REV.docx; 8/7/2024]
13. INTEGRATED AGREEMENT. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.
14. CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW. CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE LICENSED AND REGULATED BY THE CONTRACTORS’ STATE LICENSE
BOARD WHICH HAS JURISDICTION TO INVESTIGATE COMPLAINTS AGAINST
CONTRACTORS IF A COMPLAINT REGARDING A PATENT ACT OR OMISSION IS FILED WITHIN FOUR (4) YEARS OF THE DATE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION. A
COMPLAINT REGARDING A LATENT ACT OR OMISISON PERTAINING TO STRUCUTRAL DEFECTS MUST BE FILED WITHIN TEN (10) YEARS OF THE DATE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION. ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING A CONTRACTOR MAY BE REFERRED TO THE REGISTRAR, CONTRACTORS’ STATE LICENSE BOARD, P.O.
BOX 26000, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95826.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attestation by its City Clerk under authority of Resolution No. ______________, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ____day of _________________, 20_____, and CONTRACTOR has caused this Agreement to be duly executed.
6 [C:\Users\jessi\Box\Prevailing Wage\City of Roseville\City of Roseville_Office\project manual agreement - SLC Inc - Citwide East Site Radio Communication Tower_08-06-24_REV.docx; 8/7/2024]
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a _SLC Inc._______________________, a municipal corporation __California Corporation______________ BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________
DOMINICK CASEY CHAD MATHISEN
City Manager President
BY: _______________________________
JASON WOHLGEMUTH
Secretary
ATTEST:
BY: _______________________________
CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: _______________________________
MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:
BY: _______________________________
JASON SHYKOWSKI
Public Works Director
East Communications Site
Construction RFQ Components
The following are site components the City will include in the Construction RFQ. All components spacing, orientation and cabling to follows construction drawing specs.
Tower
o Valmont 72-S940-180’ tower and foundation
20-foot center to center distance between legs
Triangular construction
Angular support bracing
Hot dipped galvanized tower assembly hardware
Vertical waveguide ladder on outside of one tower face
Inside climbing ladder in one tower corner
Safety climb cable system for 180’ tower
Safety climb cable sleeve
5/8” x 4’ galvanized lightning rod
(6) dish mounts
(10) 31-B3100 3-foot universal standoff mounts with antenna mounting pipe Anchor bolts and layout templates
o Receive, unload and construct tower
o R56 grounding or equivalent
o Wave guide (“ice bridge”) between tower and shelter for cabling with proper grounding Shelter
o VFP TT1000 12’ x 16’ lightweight metal shelter
o General construction:
The exterior roof of the shelter is constructed of sealed galvanized steel panels and a standing seam metal roof
Skid assembly will be hot dipped galvanized featuring a concrete sub floor The walls will be insulated to R-13
The ceiling will be insulated to R-19
The floor will be insulated to R-11 with spray foam insulation The interior walls and ceiling will be sheathed with 3/8" OSB backed white FRP board
One (1) 36" wide x 84" high insulated steel exterior door, with tamper-proof hinges, passage style lever handle, deadbolt lockset, hydraulic door closer and fiberglass weather hood
Exterior wall color: Tan
o Grounding:
All grounding to meet or exceed Motorola R56 standards
One (1) interior perimeter R-56 ground system consisting of a 2 AWG stranded non-jacketed copper cable, approximately 6 inches below the ceiling One (1) equipment rack ground cable run along the cable ladder; 2 AWG green jacketed. VFP will ground the four (4) Chatsworth racks per R-65 One (1) internal three tier slotted trapeze assembly mounted on the internal side of the 16-port waveguide
One (1) interior ground bar located below the trapeze assembly on the inside shelter wall.
Exterior grounding shall be provided by others
o Power distribution:
One (1) 400 Amp, 10,000 AIC, 120/240 VAC, single phase, 60 Hz, 40 space main breaker, snap-in utility power distribution panel, in a NEMA 1 surface mount enclosure
Circuit breakers for all VFP installed equipment and customer loads as specified All surface mounted EMT conduit shall have compression fittings One (1) shelter wall penetration to serve as utility power service entry Five (5) 20 Amp specification grade duplex receptacles
One (1) 20 Amp specification grade exterior duplex GFI receptacles o Automatic transfer switch (ATS):
Generac TXS
Application: Utility to Genset
Connected to generator and UPS
Enable transfer from utility to UPS during unplanned event Enable manual transfer capability for planned testing
Ampere Rating: 400
Voltage: 240 Volt
Phase: single
Neutral kit: Included
Enclosure: NEMA 1
Programmable alarm relay board
o Lighting:
Five (5) four-foot, surface mounted LED light fixtures and switch One (1) LED exterior door light with photocell control with switch override One (1) emergency light with exit sign and battery backup o HVAC:
Two (2) 3-ton (36,000 Btu/hr. ea.), 240-volt, single phase, 11 EER wall mounted Heat Pumps, with low ambient and compressor anti cycle controls, integral 5 kW resistance heat strips and washable dust filters
Bard WL-361-AOZBPXXXJ, or equivalent
Redundant lead/lag controls allowing approximately equal operating time on each air conditioning unit
Bard MC4002-B, or equivalent
One (1) Honeywell H600A humidistat wired to the controller o Accessories:
One (1) 16-port/waveguide entry panel with 3" sleeves and protective blank covers
One (1) 36” x 48” x 3/4" equipment mounting board
24" wide cable ladder/tray to provide raceways from cable entry to all (4) racks Four (4) seven-foot (7’) Chatsworth equipment racks
VFP will bolt, ground, and brace these equipment racks for shipment.
All equipment integration in the racks will be supplied and installed by others
One (1) portable 10-pound CO2 fire extinguisher
One (1) handheld emergency eye wash station
One (1) first aid kit
One (1) service manual
If requested, VFP will provide three (3) sets of shelter drawings with each shelter unit order. Typical foundation drawings based upon normal soil conditions are available to support calculations for recommended shelter tie down locations. No other foundation drawings are offered in the proposed shelter price. Additional foundation drawings can be provided and will be negotiated separately
All wiring will be installed in surface mounted conduit if specified and will be in full compliance with ANSI/NFPA-70
Shelters will be built according to the latest IBC edition and state requirements of which the shelter is residing, local and county codes are not applicable unless otherwise stated
o Alarms:
All alarms will be tagged and terminated on three (3) punch blocks:
One (1) line voltage smoke detector
One (1) intrusion alarm switch with form “C” contacts rated .1 Amps at 28 VDC
One (1) high temperature alarm wired in controller
One (1) low temperature alarm wired in controller
One (1) utility power failure alarm
ATS alarms: Normal, Standby, Remote Start
HVAC failure alarms
o Receive, unload and install shelter
Generator
o Generator and foundation
o 70kW Generac
Compatible with ATS
o Receive, unload and install generator
o Connect to fuel tank and ATS for seamless transition to/from utility power and UPS power
o R56 grounding or equivalent
Fuel tank
o Fuel tank and foundation
o 500-gallon propane tank
o Gauge to measure fuel capacity
o Receive, unload and install fuel tank
o Connect to generator
o R56 grounding or equivalent
Grading, driveway, fencing, etc.
o Fencing R56 grounding or equivalent
o Concrete driveway
DRAW
[L:\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 3/8/2022]
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI
A P P R O V E D
APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION
OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR
Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES Alexander Takahashi, P.E. I certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of California. License No: E8508 Expiration Date: 09/30/24 PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES PFS CORPORATION - Cottage Grove, WI A P P R O V E D THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE OR APPROVE ANY OMISSION OR DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAWS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES AB 626 - 1
[L:\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 3/8/2022] TEXT OF AB 626
Assembly Bill No. 626
CHAPTER 810
An act to add and repeal Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code, relating to public contracts.
[Approved by Governor September 29, 2016. Filed with Secretary of State September 29, 2016.]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
AB 626, Chiu. Public contracts: claim resolution.
Existing law prescribes various requirements regarding the formation, content, and enforcement of state and local public contracts. Existing law applicable to state public contracts generally requires that the resolution of claims related to those contracts be subject to arbitration.
Existing law applicable to local agency contracts prescribes a process for the resolution of claims related to those contracts of $375,000 or less.
This bill would establish, for contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2017, a claim resolution process applicable to any claim by a contractor in connection with a public works project. The bill would define a claim as a separate demand by the contractor for one or more of the following: a time extension for relief from damages or penalties for delay, payment of money or damages arising from work done pursuant to the contract for a public work, or payment of an amount disputed by the public entity, as specified.
This bill would require a public entity, defined to exclude certain state entities, upon receipt of a claim sent by registered or certified mail, to review it and, within 45 days, provide a written statement identifying the disputed and undisputed portions of the claim. The bill would authorize the 45-day period to be extended by mutual agreement. The bill would require any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim to be processed within 60 days, as specified. The bill would require that the claim be deemed rejected in its entirety if the public entity fails to issue the written statement.
This bill would authorize, if the claimant disputes the public entity’s written response or if the public entity fails to respond to a claim within the time prescribed, the claimant to demand to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. The bill would require any disputed portion of the claim that remains in dispute after the meet and confer conference to be subject to nonbinding mediation, as specified. The bill would provide that unpaid claim amounts accrue interest at 7% per annum. The bill would prescribe a procedure by which a subcontractor or lower tier contractor may make a claim through the contractor.
This bill would require the text of these provisions, or a summary, to be set forth in the plans or specifications for any public work which may give rise to a claim. The bill would specify that a waiver of these rights is void and contrary to public policy, except as specified. The bill would also specify that it does not impose liability on a public entity that makes loans or grants available through a competitive application process, for the failure of an awardee to meet its contractual obligations.
AB 626 - 2
[L:\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 3/8/2022] By increasing the duties of local agencies and officials, this bill would impose a statemandated local program.
This bill would, on January 1, 2020, repeal the provision establishing the claim resolution process.
This bill would specify that these provisions constitute a matter of statewide concern.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 9204 is added to the Public Contract Code, to read:
9204. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the best interests of the state and its citizens to ensure that all construction business performed on a public works project in the state that is complete and not in dispute is paid in full and in a timely manner.
(b) Notwithstanding any other law, including, but not limited to, Article 7.1 (commencing with Section 10240) of Chapter 1 of Part 2, Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 19100) of Part 2, and Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 20104) of Chapter 1 of Part 3, this section shall apply to any claim by a contractor in connection with a public works project. (c) For purposes of this section:
(1) ”Claim” means a separate demand by a contractor sent by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested, for one or more of the following:
(A) A time extension, including, without limitation, for relief from damages or penalties for delay assessed by a public entity under a contract for a public works project. (B) Payment by the public entity of money or damages arising from work done by, or on behalf of, the contractor pursuant to the contract for a public works project and payment for which is not otherwise expressly provided or to which the claimant is not otherwise entitled. (C) Payment of an amount that is disputed by the public entity. (2) ”Contractor” means any type of contractor within the meaning of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code who has entered into a direct contract with a public entity for a public works project. (3) (A) ”Public entity” means, without limitation, except as provided in subparagraph (B), a state agency, department, office, division, bureau, board, or commission, the California State University, the University of California, a city, including a charter city, county, including a charter county, city and county, including a charter city and county, district, special district, public authority, political subdivision, public corporation, or nonprofit transit corporation wholly owned by a public agency and formed to carry out the purposes of the public agency. (B) ”Public entity” shall not include the following:
(i) The Department of Water Resources as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department.
(ii) The Department of Transportation as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department.
AB 626 - 3
[L:\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 3/8/2022] (iii) The Department of Parks and Recreation as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department.
(iv) The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation with respect to any project under its jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 11 (commencing with Section 7000) of Title 7 of Part 3 of the Penal Code.
(v) The Military Department as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department. (vi) The Department of General Services as to all other projects. (vii) The High-Speed Rail Authority.
(4) ”Public works project” means the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement of any kind. (5) ”Subcontractor” means any type of contractor within the meaning of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code who either is in direct contract with a contractor or is a lower tier subcontractor. (d) (1) (A) Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this section, the public entity to which the claim applies shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days, shall provide the claimant a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Upon receipt of a claim, a public entity and a contractor may, by mutual agreement, extend the time period provided in this subdivision. (B) The claimant shall furnish reasonable documentation to support the claim. (C) If the public entity needs approval from its governing body to provide the claimant a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the governing body does not meet within the 45 days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the public entity shall have up to three days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the governing body after the 45-day period, or extension, expires to provide the claimant a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion. (D) Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement. If the public entity fails to issue a written statement, paragraph (3) shall apply.
(2) (A) If the claimant disputes the public entity’s written response, or if the public entity fails to respond to a claim issued pursuant to this section within the time prescribed, the claimant may demand in writing an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand in writing sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the public entity shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of the dispute.
(B) Within 10 business days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, the public entity shall provide the claimant a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the contractor in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with the public entity and the claimant sharing the associated costs equally. The public entity and claimant shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing. If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each party shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each AB 626 - 4
[L:\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 3/8/2022] party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator. If mediation is unsuccessful, the parts of the claim remaining in dispute shall be subject to applicable procedures outside this section. (C) For purposes of this section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this section. (D) Unless otherwise agreed to by the public entity and the contractor in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this section shall excuse any further obligation under Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced. (E) This section does not preclude a public entity from requiring arbitration of disputes under private arbitration or the Public Works Contract Arbitration Program, if mediation under this section does not resolve the parties’ dispute.
(3) Failure by the public entity to respond to a claim from a contractor within the time periods described in this subdivision or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. A claim that is denied by reason of the public entity’s failure to have responded to a claim, or its failure to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section, shall not constitute an adverse finding with regard to the merits of the claim or the responsibility or qualifications of the claimant. (4) Amounts not paid in a timely manner as required by this section shall bear interest at 7 percent per annum.
(5) If a subcontractor or a lower tier subcontractor lacks legal standing to assert a claim against a public entity because privity of contract does not exist, the contractor may present to the public entity a claim on behalf of a subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor. A subcontractor may request in writing, either on his or her own behalf or on behalf of a lower tier subcontractor, that the contractor present a claim for work which was performed by the subcontractor or by a lower tier subcontractor on behalf of the subcontractor. The subcontractor requesting that the claim be presented to the public entity shall furnish reasonable documentation to support the claim. Within 45 days of receipt of this written request, the contractor shall notify the subcontractor in writing as to whether the contractor presented the claim to the public entity and, if the original contractor did not present the claim, provide the subcontractor with a statement of the reasons for not having done so.
(e) The text of this section or a summary of it shall be set forth in the plans or specifications for any public works project that may give rise to a claim under this section. (f) A waiver of the rights granted by this section is void and contrary to public policy, provided, however, that (1) upon receipt of a claim, the parties may mutually agree to waive, in writing, mediation and proceed directly to the commencement of a civil action or binding arbitration, as applicable; and (2) a public entity may prescribe reasonable change order, claim, and dispute resolution procedures and requirements in addition to the provisions of this section, so long as the contractual provisions do not conflict with or otherwise impair the timeframes and procedures set forth in this section.
(g) This section applies to contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2017. (h) Nothing in this section shall impose liability upon a public entity that makes loans or grants available through a competitive application process, for the failure of an awardee to meet its contractual obligations.
(i) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2020, and as of that date is AB 626 - 5
[L:\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 3/8/2022] repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2020, deletes or extends that date.
SECTION 2.
The Legislature finds and declares that it is of statewide concern to require a charter city, charter county, or charter city and county to follow a prescribed claims resolution process to ensure there are uniform and equitable procurement practices.
SECTION 3.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
Prepared for:
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Prepared by:
11521 Blocker Drive, Suite 110
Auburn, CA 95603
(530) 887-1494
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower
Roseville, California
July 2022
Auburn Office:
11521 Blocker Drive, Ste 110
Auburn, CA 95603 West Sacramento (916) 375-8706
(530) 887-1494 Fresno (559) 438-8411
File No. 4211.X
July 8, 2022
Gina McColl
City of Roseville
Economic Development Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Subject: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower
Roseville, California
Dear Gina,
Blackburn Consulting (Blackburn) is pleased to submit this Geotechnical Report for the City of Roseville’s Strauch Drive Tower Project in Roseville, California. Blackburn prepared this report in accordance with our agreement dated May 31, 2022.
Thank you for selecting Blackburn on your design team. Please call us if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
BLACKBURN CONSULTING
Luke Morrell, E.I.T. Haze Rodgers, P.E., G.E.
Project Engineer Geotechnical Director
Reviewed by:
David Morrell, P.E., G.E.
Senior Project Manager
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
i
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 Purpose........................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of Services ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................1 3 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ...............................................................................................................3 4 FIELDWORK AND LABORATORY TESTING ......................................................................................3 Exploratory Borings ..................................................................................................................... 3 Laboratory Testing....................................................................................................................... 3 5 SUBSURFACE FINDINGS ................................................................................................................4 Soil and Rock Conditions ............................................................................................................. 4 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................... 4 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................5 Site Suitability .............................................................................................................................. 5 Seismic Design ............................................................................................................................. 5 Grading ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Excavations ......................................................................................................................... 6 Original Ground and Subgrade Preparation ....................................................................... 6 Fill and Compaction ............................................................................................................ 7 Over-Optimum Soil Moisture.............................................................................................. 7 Utility Trenches ............................................................................................................................ 7 Temporary Excavations and Trench Stability...................................................................... 7 Backfill and Compaction ..................................................................................................... 8 Mat Foundation Recommendations............................................................................................ 8 Mat Foundations ................................................................................................................. 8 Mat Underlayment ............................................................................................................. 9 Design Considerations for Moisture ................................................................................... 9 Shallow Foundation Recommendations ...................................................................................... 9 Drilled Pier Foundation Recommendations .............................................................................. 10 Drilled Pier Foundation Recommendations – Self-Supporting Tower .............................. 10 Flatwork – Pedestrian Traffic Only ............................................................................................ 11 Soil Corrosion Potential ............................................................................................................. 11 Pavement Design ....................................................................................................................... 12 Subgrade and Aggregate Base Preparation ...................................................................... 12
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
ii
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavement .................................................................................... 12 7 RISK MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................. 13 8 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................. 13
FIGURES
Figure 1 – Vicinity Map
Figure 2 – Site Plan
APPENDIX A
Boring Logs and Boring Log Legend
APPENDIX B
Laboratory Test Results
APPENDIX C
Important Information about This Geotechnical Engineering Report
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
1 1 INTRODUCTION
Purpose
Blackburn Consulting (Blackburn) prepared this Geotechnical Report (Report) for the City of Roseville’s (City) Strauch Drive Tower Project (Project) in Roseville, California. This report describes the surface and subsurface conditions, site geology, and geotechnical design/construction recommendations. Do not use or rely upon this report for different locations or improvements without the written consent of Blackburn.
Scope of Services
To prepare this report, Blackburn:
Discussed the Project with Gina McColl (City of Roseville).
Reviewed Topographic Survey Existing Conditions Plans (Sheets C-1 and C-2), Hayes Land Surveying and Mapping, dated 19 January 2022.
Reviewed Proposed Equipment Installation Strauch Drive (Sheet A-1), L.D. Strobel Co. Inc., dated 22 February 2022.
Reviewed Pleasant Grove As-Built Plans (Sheet T-1, G-1, C-1 through C-8, and SP-1 through SP5), Patriot Towers, dated 22 October 2010.
Reviewed Word Document Titled: Required Soils Information For Self-Supported Tower Foundations, undated.
Reviewed published geologic mapping and geotechnical data.
Marked boring location and notified Underground Service Alert (USA North) Observed, logged, and sampled one boring to 25 feet in depth below ground surface.
Performed laboratory tests on samples obtained from the exploratory boring.
Completed engineering analysis and calculations to develop our conclusions and recommendations.
2 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City plans to construct a new communications tower and associated support equipment at 2001 Strauch Drive in Roseville, California. The new communications tower will be a maximum of 190-foot tall “Self-Supporting Tower”. A new access road will be constructed from the existing parking lot southeast of the site to the tower. The anticipated equipment includes:
1000-gallon propane tank,
70kW propane generator, and
Approximately 12-foot by 17-foot shelter structure.
The site is an undeveloped parcel owned by the City generally covered with grasses and small to large oak trees. The site is located at 2001 Strauch Drive in Roseville, California at approximate GPS coordinates of 38.74318921° N, Longitude: -121.25431382° W. The site is bound by Strauch Drive to the west and south, and commercial properties to the north and east. Figure 1 shows the project vicinity.
Photos 1 and 2 show the site conditions.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
2 Photo 1
Photo 1: Southern portion of the site looking north towards the proposed tower location.
The proposed improvements are shown on Figure 2.
Photo 2
Photo 2: Northern portion of the site looking south towards the proposed tower location.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
3 3 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The site is located within the north central portion of the Great Valley Geomorphic Province. The Great Valley is a broad, elongated, northwest trending, structural trough that has been filled with a thick sequence of marine and alluvial sediments.
Published Geologic Mapping1 shows the site is underlain by the Tertiary Mehrten Formation consisting of mainly andesitic conglomerate, sandstone, and volcanic mudflow breccia. The volcanic mudflow breccia typically consists of a gray mixture of gravel to boulder size, angular, andesitic fragments in a well cemented matric of volcanic lapilli and ash. The andesitic boulders can be sizeable (1 to 3-foot diameter and occasionally larger) and are much harder than the well cemented matrix. The cobble conglomerate consists primarily of cobbles in a well-cemented matrix of andesitic sand and silt but can contain large boulders. The cobble conglomerate often contains interbedded layers of sandstone, siltstone, and lenses of mudflow breccia. Bedding within the Mehrten Formation dips gently (approximately 2 to 3 degrees to the west/southwest).
We encountered the volcanic mudflow breccia in our borings beneath the overlying soil to the depth explored.
4 FIELDWORK AND LABORATORY TESTING
Exploratory Borings
To characterize the subsurface conditions, Blackburn logged and sampled one boring to a depth of 25 feet below the ground surface (bgs). Our subcontractor (Taber Drilling) drilled the boring using a solid-stem (4- inch diameter) auger and switched to HQ rock coring upon refusal to auger advancement. We obtained soil and decomposed/very intensely weathered rock samples at various intervals for 18-inch drives using 3.0- inch O.D. Modified California (MC) and 2.0-inch O.D. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samplers driven with an automatic hammer, weighing 140-pounds, and falling approximately 30 inches per blow. We recorded the blow counts to drive the sampler each 6 inches on the boring log. The driller terminated the sample drive when a total of 50 blows had been applied during any of the 6-inch increments (50/3”as an example).
Upon completion, the boring was backfilled with grout in accordance with the City of Roseville soil boring permit.
Blackburn’s project geologist, Nick Vasquez, logged the boring and retrieved samples for laboratory testing.
The samples were labeled and delivered to our West Sacramento laboratory for geotechnical testing.
We present our boring log in Appendix A and the boring location and proposed improvements in Figure 2.
Laboratory Testing
We completed the following laboratory tests on representative samples from our exploratory boring:
Moisture content and Dry Density (ASTM D2216 and D2937) for soil consistency. 1 Gutierrez, Carlos I., 2011, Preliminary Geologic Map of the Sacramento 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, California, (Scale 1:100,000), California Geological Survey.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
4 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318) and 200 Wash (ASTM D1140 for soil classification.
Rock Core Unconfined Compression (ASTM D2166) to measure rock strength.
Direct Shear (ASTM D3080) to measure soil strength.
Chlorides, Sulfates, pH, and Minimum Resistivity (CTM 417, 422, and 643) for corrosion characteristics.
R-Value (California Test Method – CTM 301) for pavement design.
Laboratory test results are included in Appendix B and on the boring log in Appendix A. 5 SUBSURFACE FINDINGS
Soil and Rock Conditions
Table 1 summarizes the subsurface conditions encountered in our boring:
Table 1:
Subsurface Conditions
Boring
Number
Approximate
Depth (ft.) Description
B-1
0 – 5.5 Very dense silty sand with gravel
5.5 – 9.0 Very dense silty sand
9.0 – 14.5
Mehrten Formation volcanic breccia,
decomposed to intensely weathered igneous rock
14.5 – 25.0
Mehrten Formation volcanic breccia, moderately
to slightly weathered, very intensely to
moderately fractured, hard to very hard igneous
rock
Refer to the boring log in Appendix A for more detailed descriptions.
Groundwater
We did not encounter groundwater during our subsurface exploration. Groundwater and perched water levels can fluctuate due to changes in precipitation, nearby surface water levels, irrigation, pumping of wells, and other factors. Generally, groundwater levels will be at their highest during winter/spring and lower from summer through late fall.
Blackburn reviewed groundwater level data available at the California Department of Water Resources website (SGMA Data Viewer (ca.gov)), which indicates that recent historic groundwater levels range from approximately 70 to 100 feet below ground surface.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
5 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Site Suitability
The site should be suitable for the planned improvements when constructed in accordance with the project plans, industry standards, and our geotechnical recommendations.
Seismic Design
Blackburn used the SEAOC/OSHPD Seismic Design Maps Tool to determine our recommended 2019 California Building Code (CBC) seismic design parameters, we considered:
ASCE 7-16 Reference Standard
Risk Category II
Site Class C – Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock
Latitude: 38.74318921°, Longitude: -121.25431382°
These inputs were selected based on our understanding on the function of the project improvements and subsurface conditions encountered. Table 2 presents our recommended 2019 CBC seismic design parameters.
Table 2: Seismic Design Parameters (CBC 2019)
Site Class C
Ss – Acceleration Parameter 0.432 g
S1 – Acceleration Parameter 0.218 g
Fa – Site Coefficient 1.3
Fv – Site Coefficient 1.5
SMS – Adjusted MCE Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter 0.561 g SM1 – Adjusted MCE Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter 0.327 g SDS – Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter 0.374 g SD1 – Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter 0.218 g TL - Long-Period Transition Period 12 sec
PGA - Peak Ground Acceleration 0.183 g
PGAM - Site Modified Peak Ground Acceleration 0.223 g
Grading
Where referenced in this report, use ASTM D1557 test methods to determine relative compaction and optimum moisture. Compacted soil should not be considered suitable (even if it meets relative compaction requirements) if it is unstable and pumps or flexes excessively under construction equipment loads.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
6 Excavations
Our exploratory boring at the site suggests that the upper soil should be excavatable with conventional earthmoving equipment. Excavations in the Mehrten Formation and likely encounter little to no progress with conventional earthmoving equipment. The actual excavation effort will depend on the equipment type and methods used, and the amount of wear and tear and progress acceptable to the contractor.
The contractor is responsible for selecting equipment.
All excavations must be sloped, shored, and/or shielded in accordance with current Cal/OSHA requirements. The contractor is responsible for site safety, excavation, and final shoring design (including OSHA soil type determination) and construction, based on actual excavation conditions (including trench spoils, equipment, stockpiles, etc.) encountered during construction. The contractor is also responsible for the protection of existing facilities and improvements. At the time of construction, the contractor must evaluate and adjust accordingly excavation sloping/shoring methods based on:
The impact of construction traffic vibrations.
Actual soil/rock conditions exposed in the open excavations.
Seepage and/or groundwater conditions.
Surcharges adjacent to excavations.
Proximity of excavations to existing structures or trees.
Other factors that may promote excavation wall instability or cause excavation related damage to existing facilities and improvements.
Original Ground and Subgrade Preparation
Prior to site grading:
Strip vegetation to a minimum depth of 2 inches below the ground surface and remove brush and trees including the root balls and roots larger than 1-inch diameter.
Remove existing utilities, underground structures, and trench backfill in the structure footprints and 5 feet beyond.
Do not use strippings within fills, except in the upper 2 feet of landscape areas (non-structural locations) if approved by the landscape architect.
Following the above preparation:
Scarify the subgrade to a depth of 8 inches.
Uniformly moisture condition the scarified native subgrade to 2% to 4% above the optimum moisture content.
Compact the exposed subgrade to a minimum 90% relative compaction.
Compact the upper 6 inches of pavement subgrade to a minimum 95% relative compaction.
Place and compact fill as outlined in Section 6.3.3.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
7 Fill and Compaction
The on-site soil may be used as fill provided it is free of debris, visible concentrations of vegetation, and has a maximum particle size of 3-inches. If import fill is required, it should meet the following specifications:
No concentrations of organics, debris, and other deleterious materials, Maximum particle size of 1-inch, with at least 75% passing the No. 4 Sieve, and no more than 30% passing the No. 200 Sieve.
Plasticity Index less than or equal to 12, per ASTM D4318.
Expansion Index of less than or equal to 20, per ASTM D4829 Must be approved by Blackburn prior to its transport to the site.
Place fill as follows:
Place fill in loose lifts no thicker than 8 inches prior to compaction.
Uniformly moisture condition each lift of native fill to 2% to 4% above the optimum moisture content and import fill (including aggregate base) 0% to 2% above the optimum moisture content. In concrete flatwork areas, maintain the native fill moisture content until the fill is covered by additional fill or the aggregate base section.
Compact import fill to at least 90% relative compaction in flatwork areas and 95% beneath structures.
Over-Optimum Soil Moisture
Excessively over-optimum (wet) soil conditions can make proper compaction difficult or impossible. Wet soil is commonly encountered during the winter and spring months, or in excavations where groundwater or perched groundwater is encountered.
In general, wet soil can be mitigated by:
Discing the soil during prolonged periods of dry weather, Over-excavating and replacement with drier material,
Stabilization using aggregate and stabilization fabric or grid.
If wet, unstable soil is encountered, Blackburn can observe the conditions and provide more specific mitigation recommendations.
Utility Trenches
Temporary Excavations and Trench Stability
Trench excavations should remain stable in the upper 4 feet. We anticipate temporary excavation sloping and shoring requirements for Type C soil (Federal Register, 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P; Occupational Safety and Health Standards – Excavations) for shallow excavations (up to 10 feet depth from existing site grades).
All excavations must be sloped, shored, and/or shielded in accordance with current Cal/OSHA requirements. The impact of construction traffic vibrations, actual soil conditions exposed in the open
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
8 excavations, surcharges adjacent to excavations, proximity of excavations to existing structures, and other factors that may promote excavation wall instability must be evaluated at the time of construction and excavation sloping/shoring adjusted accordingly. The contractor is responsible for site safety and final excavation and shoring design and construction based on construction schedule and sequencing and actual environmental and excavation conditions.
Backfill and Compaction
On-site and imported soil is suitable for trench backfill provided it meets fill requirements in Section 6.3.3.
Place and compact trench backfill as follows:
1. Place trench backfill in maximum 12-inch-thick loose lifts.
2. Uniformly moisture condition trench backfill to within 2% of optimum.
3. Uniformly compact trench backfill to at least 95% relative compaction.
Jetting is not acceptable for compaction.
Soil excavated during trenching may have a moisture content well below optimum, especially during summer months or after prolonged periods of dry weather. Allow adequate time for moisture conditioning soils prior to backfilling and compaction. During the winter and spring months or if perched water is encountered, excavated soil may have a moisture content well above optimum. In this case, it will be necessary to dry back the soil prior to use as backfill.
Mat Foundation Recommendations
Mat Foundations
Blackburn provides the following geotechnical design recommendations for support of the equipment pads. We assume the 70kW propane generate and 1000-gallon propane tank will be supported on a reinforced concrete mat slab foundation:
Compact the exposed mat foundation subgrade and any fill placed below the mat foundation in accordance with Sections 6.4.2 and 6.4.3.
Use a maximum contact pressure for mat foundation of 5,000 psf.
Use an average Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, ks, equal to 70 pci. The Modulus of Subgrade reaction is dependent upon multiple factors that are not known at this time. These factors include the dimensions and stiffness of the mat, and the magnitude and variation of bearing pressure. For settlement sensitive structures Blackburn should check the recommended Modulus of Subgrade Reaction once preliminary foundation pressures are available and provide updated values for final design. In some cases, multiple iterations are required between Blackburn and the structural engineer.
We expect settlement of mat foundations is expected to be less than ½ -inch.
Clean footing excavations of debris and loose soil prior to placing concrete.
Blackburn must observe all footing excavations prior to reinforcement placement to verify competent bearing materials.
Slope the ground surface away from the mat foundations at a minimum of 5 percent for a distance of at least 5 feet.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
9 For subgrade uniformity, Caltrans Class 2 Aggregate Base (AB) can be used as underlayment (this is not geotechnically necessary provided a firm uniform subgrade is obtained). If an aggregate underlayment is used, place a minimum thickness of 6-inches, and compact to a minimum of 95% relative compaction.
Mat Underlayment
Underlay concrete floor slabs with a minimum of 4 inches of washed, crushed, and compacted rock to provide uniform support. Crushed rock used beneath floor slabs should be graded so that 100% passes the ¾ inch sieve and less than 5% passes the No. 4 sieve. Compact crushed rock with at least two passes of a vibratory type compactor. Substitute compacted AB if moisture transmission through the floor slab is acceptable. The AB should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction.
Design Considerations for Moisture
We did not observe shallow groundwater or shallow seepage in the exploratory boring. However, irrigation and storm water can accumulate near the ground surface and around structures. While we do not expect water accumulations to be significant enough to require underfloor drainage systems, it could be enough to cause higher than normal moisture vapor to pass through the concrete mat.
Excessive vapor can cause floor covering damage and mold.
The designer must consider the potential for excessive water vapor, its potential impact on proposed improvements, and design the slabs and underlayment accordingly. References providing guidelines for vapor mitigation and slab underlayment include ASTM E 1643, ACI 302.1R-04, PCA, and flooring manufacturer requirements for the intended use.
No matter how extensive the vapor mitigation design, some vapor will pass through the slabs and, the slabs themselves will absorb and release some moisture. Therefore, consult with floor covering and mold specialists, and include a contingency to replace some floor coverings and mitigate potential mold growth.
Shallow Foundation Recommendations
We recommend the design of shallow foundations consider:
Minimum footing embedment isolated and combined of 24 inches below the lowest adjacent soil grade.
Strip footings must be a minimum of 12 inches wide.
Isolated footings must be a minimum of 18 inches wide.
Size strip and isolated footings not to exceed an allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf (dead plus live load).
The allowable bearing capacity may be increased by one-third for transient loads where used with the alternative basic load combinations in Section 1605.3.2 (2019 California Building Code, (CBC)) that include seismic and/or wind loads.
We estimate total settlement of about ½ inch considering the allowable bearing capacity above.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
10 This is immediate settlement that should occur with initial loading.
To resist lateral movement, use an ultimate coefficient of friction of 0.36 at the base of the foundation and an ultimate passive earth pressure of 420 psf per foot of embedment depth.
Both friction and passive earth pressure can be combined for lateral resistance; when combined, increase the safety factor against sliding from a minimum of 1.5 to 2.0. Ignore the passive resistance of the upper foot of soil.
Slope the ground surface away from foundations at a minimum of 5 percent for a distance of at least 5 feet.
Clean footing excavations of debris and loose soil prior to placing concrete.
Blackburn must observe all footing excavations prior to reinforcement placement to verify competent bearing materials are exposed.
Drilled Pier Foundation Recommendations
Drilled Pier Foundation Recommendations – Self-Supporting Tower Design reinforced cast-in-place concrete piers in accordance with the following recommendations:
Provide a minimum pier:
o diameter of 18 inches,
o Minimum depth of 10 feet,
o spacing of 6 diameters, center-to-center (6D Spacing).
Table 3 provides allowable skin friction values to resist uplift and compression loads:
Table 3: Allowable Skin Friction
Depth Below
Finish Grade (ft)
Allowable Skin Friction (psf)
Compression
Resistance Uplift Resistance Factor of Safety
0 to 6 85 65 2.0
6 to Top of
Mehrten 330 250 2.0
Within Mehrten 2,000 1,500 2.0
In combination with skin friction resistance, an allowable soil bearing pressure of 10,000 pounds per square foot may also be used for end bearing resistance to resist compression loads for the piers embedded at least 6. Pier bottoms must be cleaned to remove any loose soil or debris prior to concrete placement if end bearing resistance is used for design.
Table 4 provides allowable passive pressure values to resist pier lateral loads:
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
11 Table 4: Allowable Passive Pressure
Depth Below Finish
Grade (ft)
Allowable Passive
Pressure (psf/ft) Factor of Safety
0 to 6 210 2.0
6 to Top of
Mehrten
230 2.0
Within Mehrten 300 2.0
The above allowable skin friction, bearing pressure and passive pressure values may be increased by one-third for transient loads such as wind or seismic.
Group reduction factors for axial and lateral resistance are not necessary provided the minimum 6D pier spacing is maintained. Reduction factors for piers located closer than 6D can be provided on a case-by-case basis.
For drilled pier foundations not located within concrete flatwork or pavement areas, neglect skin friction and passive pressure resistance within the upper 1 foot of finish grade.
For reinforced piers designed in accordance with the above recommendations, we estimate total settlement about ½ inch.
Pier excavations through the soil layer will likely be able to be drilled with conventional auger drilling techniques based on the soil conditions encountered in our explorations. Drilling in the underlying Mehrten formation may be difficult with conventional augers and may require specialized hard rock drilling equipment. The contractor is responsible for selecting the appropriate drilling equipment and techniques to drill the piers.
Pier excavations should be dewatered prior to placing concrete.
Flatwork – Pedestrian Traffic Only
Use the following minimum sections for unreinforced concrete sidewalks and flatwork subjected to pedestrian traffic only. Exterior flatwork should have a minimum section consisting of 6 inches of concrete reinforced with No. 3 rebar spaced at 18 inches on center each way. Wire mesh reinforcement and dowels between panels is a suitable alternative design. The flatwork should be underlain by at least 6 inches of aggregate base or non-expansive imported fill. Process and compact flatwork subgrade and aggregate base/non-expansive fill in accordance with Section 6.4.3. Flatwork must be properly jointed to allow for slab shrinkage and movement. ACI provides recommendations on slab jointing based on slab thickness, location, and use.
Soil Corrosion Potential
Table 5 presents the soil corrosivity test results.
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
12 Table 5: Soil Corrosion Test Results
Sample No. Depth (ft.) pH
Minimum
Resistivity
(ohm-cm)
Sulfate
Content
(ppm)
Chloride
Content (ppm)
B1-1B 3-3.5 5.61 2,470 88.5 3.7
Based on the test results, structural concrete in contact with the ground should meet the concrete and reinforcing steel requirements of American Concrete Institute’s Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI-318-19) for Exposure Class S0 (Sulfates) and Exposure Class C1 (Chlorides).
The corrosion test results indicate that the near surface soil is corrosive to steel and other metals. We are not corrosion consultants, and we did not evaluate the potential corrosion impacts to metallic elements embedded in or in contact with the ground. Retain a corrosion consultant to provide specific corrosion protection recommendations if buried metallic elements are used at the site.
Pavement Design
Subgrade and Aggregate Base Preparation
Process and compact pavement subgrade in accordance with Section 6.3.2. Aggregate base (AB) should conform to Caltrans Class 2 requirements. Moisture condition and compact AB to a minimum 95% relative compaction. Prior to placing asphalt, the aggregate base should be stable under the weight of a loaded water truck. Contact Blackburn to observe unstable areas and provide mitigation recommendations, if necessary.
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavement
R-value laboratory tests on samples of near surface soil encountered resulted in an R-value of 25. We used the Caltrans Flexible Pavement Design Empirical Method (Highway Design Manual, Chapter 630) to calculate the new pavement section recommendations. Table 6 shows the recommended structural sections based on an R-values of 25. The designer must select the applicable Traffic Index (TI) to represent anticipated loading.
Table 6:
Recommended HMA Pavement Sections
(R-Value = 25)
Traffic Index
(TI)
HMA Thickness
(Type A) (in)
Class 2 Aggregate
Base Thickness (in)
5.0 3.0 6.5
6.0 4.5 6.5
7.0 5.0 9.0
8.0 6.0 10.0
9.0 7.0 12.0
10.0 8.0 13.5
Design the pavement areas to allow for positive surface drainage. Adequate surface slope, subgrade crown, and uniform compaction contribute to long-term pavement performance. If water is trapped
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
City of Roseville – Strauch Drive Tower, Roseville, California July 8, 2022
13 under pavement the water can saturate the base course and soil subgrade, which results in premature pavement failure. Construct cut-off curbs where landscaping abuts the pavement to help limit water migration into the base course. Provide a minimum cut-off curb width of 4 inches. Extend curbs a minimum of 4 inches into the soil underlying the base course. 7 RISK MANAGEMENT
Our experience and that of our profession clearly indicates that the risks of costly design, construction, and maintenance problems can be significantly lowered by retaining the geotechnical engineer of record to provide required services during design and construction. For this project, retain Blackburn to:
Review and provide comments on the civil plans, foundation plans, and specifications prior to construction.
Monitor construction to check and document our report assumptions. At a minimum, Blackburn should test/monitor over-excavation, grading, foundation excavation, backfill, general compaction, and utility trench backfill.
Update this report if layout or design changes occur, 2 years or more lapses between this report and construction, and/or site conditions have changed.
If we are not retained to perform the above applicable services, we are not responsible for any other party’s interpretation of our report, and subsequent addendums, letters, and discussions. 8 LIMITATIONS
Blackburn performed services in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices currently used in this area. We do not warranty our services.
Blackburn based this report on the current site conditions. We assume the soil and groundwater conditions observed are representative of the subsurface conditions on the site. Actual subsurface conditions could be different.
Our scope did not include evaluation of the potential for hazardous materials impacts or corrosion mitigation.
Modern design and construction are complex, with many regulatory sources/restrictions, involved parties, construction alternatives, etc. It is common to experience changes and delays. The owner should set aside a reasonable contingency fund based on complexities and cost estimates to cover changes and delays.
Appendix A contains our boring log. The lines designating the interface between soil and rock types are approximate. The transition between soil types may be abrupt or gradual. Our recommendations are based on the final logs, which represent our interpretation of the field log and general knowledge of the site and geological conditions. The boring location and elevation are approximate (locations were not surveyed).
DIRECT SHEAR TEST REPORT
Blackburn Consulting
W. Sacramento, CA
Client: City of Roseville
Project: City of Roseville - Stauch Drive Tower
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 6-6.5'
Sample Number: 2C
Proj. No.: 4211.x Date Sampled:
Sample Type: CalMod
Description: SILTY SAND
Assumed Specific Gravity= 2.7
Remarks:
Figure
Sample No.
Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.
Height, in.
Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.
Height, in.
Normal Stress, psf
Fail. Stress, psf
Strain, %
Ult. Stress, psf
Strain, %
Strain rate, in./min. Initial At Test Shear Stress, psf 0 500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Strain, %
0 10 20 30 40
1 2
3 Vertical Deformation, in.
0.03 0.02
0.01 0
-0.01
-0.02
-0.03
Strain, %
0 5.5 11 16.5 22
Dilation
Consol.
1 2
3 Fail. Stress, psf
0 1000
2000
3000
Normal Stress, psf
0 1000 2000 3000
C, psf
, deg
Tan()
Results
0 39.9
0.84 1
14.9 89.2
45.3 0.8905
2.400
1.000
31.0 91.7
100.0
0.8378
2.400
0.972
1000.0
760.8
6.0 0.003
2 8.7
86.9 25.0
0.9397
2.400
1.000
30.2 92.8
100.0
0.8156
2.400
0.936
1500.0
1251.0
7.1 0.003
3 14.7
89.3 44.5
0.8886
2.400
1.000
28.9 94.6
100.0
0.7809
2.400
0.943
2000.0
1709.3
6.0 0.003
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
Blackburn Consulting
Date: 6/18/2022
Project No.: 4211.x
Project: City of Roseville - Stauch Drive Tower
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 0-5'
Sample Number: Bulk A 21% retained on the #4 sieve, sample batched
Remarks:
Checked by: RBL
Tested by: BRL
SANDY lean CLAY with GRAVEL,
reddish brown
Figure
Test Results Material Description
No.
Compact.
Pressure
psi
Density
pcf
Moist.
%
Expansion
Pressure
psf
Horizontal
Press. psi
@ 160 psi
Sample
Height
in.
Exud.
Pressure
psi
R
Value
R
Value
Corr.
Resistance R-Value and Expansion Pressure - Cal Test 301 R-value at 300 psi exudation pressure = 31
1 188 116.4 14.5 0 56 2.40 377 57 55
2 83 114.1 15.6 0 94 2.47 309 33 33
3 63 111.4 16.7 0 116 2.49 171 19 19
Exudation Pressure - psi R-value
800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
0 20
40 60
80 100
Project Name: City of Roseville - Strauch Drive Equipment Installation Date: 6/15/22 Specimen Boring Depth
(ft.)
FINAL
TRIM
LENGTH
(in.)
ORIGINAL
LENGTH
(in.)
DIAMETER
(in.)
AREA
(in.2 )
TOTAL
LOAD
(lbs.)
COMP
STRENGTH
(psi)
L/D RATIO
CORE
WEIGHT
(grams)
UNIT
WEIGHT
(pcf)
R1 B1 15.5-16 4.98 12.0 2.40 4.522 8120 1,796 2.08 817.9 138.38 R2 B1 19-19.5 4.77 10.0 2.39 4.484 8090 1,804 2.00 854.9 152.27 Rock Core Compression Tests
BCI File No.: 4211.X
Blackburn Consulting
W. Sacramento, CA
(no specification provided)
PL= LL= PI=
D90= D85= D60=
D50= D30= D15=
D10= Cu= Cc=
USCS= AASHTO=
*
SILTY SAND, yellowish red
#200 49.5
26 37 11
SM
City of Roseville
City of Roseville - Stauch Drive Tower
4211.x
Material Description
Atterberg Limits
Coefficients
Classification
Remarks
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 3.5-4'
Sample Number: 1C Date:
Client:
Project:
Project No: Figure
SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS?
SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PERCENT FINER
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001
% +3" % Gravel % Sand % Silt % Clay
49.5 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4#10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 Particle Size Distribution Report
Blackburn Consulting
W. Sacramento, CA
(no specification provided)
PL= LL= PI=
D90= D85= D60=
D50= D30= D15=
D10= Cu= Cc=
USCS= AASHTO=
*
yellowish red
#200 19.3
City of Roseville
City of Roseville - Stauch Drive Tower
4211.x
Material Description
Atterberg Limits
Coefficients
Classification
Remarks
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 5.5-6'
Sample Number: 2B Date:
Client:
Project:
Project No: Figure
SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS?
SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PERCENT FINER
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001
% +3" % Gravel % Sand % Silt % Clay
19.3 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4#10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 Particle Size Distribution Report
Blackburn Consulting
W. Sacramento, CA
(no specification provided)
PL= LL= PI=
D90= D85= D60=
D50= D30= D15=
D10= Cu= Cc=
USCS= AASHTO=
*
SILTY SAND
#200 15.1
City of Roseville
City of Roseville - Stauch Drive Tower
4211.x
Material Description
Atterberg Limits
Coefficients
Classification
Remarks
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 6-6.5'
Sample Number: 2C Date:
Client:
Project:
Project No: Figure
SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS?
SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PERCENT FINER
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001
% +3" % Gravel % Sand % Silt % Clay
15.1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4#10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 Particle Size Distribution Report
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PLASTICITY INDEX
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL or OL
CH or OH
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4 7
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS
Project No. Client: Remarks:
Project:
Blackburn Consulting
W. Sacramento, CA Figure
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 3.5-4' Sample Number: 1C
SILTY SAND, yellowish red 37 26 11 49.5 SM
4211.x City of Roseville
City of Roseville - Stauch Drive Tower
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
East Site Radio Communication Tower:
Emergency and Daily Operational
Services Project
Prepared for:
July 2022
Prepared by:
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834
i
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction and Summary ...................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 CEQA Lead Agency .................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Summary .................................................................................................... 1-2 Chapter 2 Project Description ................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 Project Background .................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Project Location and Existing Conditions .................................................... 2-1
2.3 Proposed Project Components ................................................................... 2-1
2.3.1 Construction of the Proposed Project ......................................................... 2-1
2.3.2 Radio Communications Tower Operations ................................................. 2-7
2.4 Best Management Practices (BMPs) .......................................................... 2-7
2.4.1 Construction BMPs ..................................................................................... 2-7
2.4.1.1 Traffic Management Plan ............................................................................ 2-8
2.4.1.2 Noise Control Measures ............................................................................. 2-9
2.4.1.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Measures ............................................. 2-9
2.4.2 City of Roseville Mitigating Ordinances....................................................... 2-9
2.5 Required Entitlements............................................................................... 2-10 Chapter 3 Environmental Checklist .......................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ................................................ 3-2
3.2 Determination ............................................................................................. 3-3
3.2.1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................... 3-4
3.2.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ........................................................... 3-9
3.2.3 Air Quality ................................................................................................. 3-11
3.2.4 Biological Resources ................................................................................ 3-17
3.2.5 Cultural Resources ................................................................................... 3-20
3.2.6 Energy ...................................................................................................... 3-23
3.2.7 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................... 3-26
3.2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ..................................................................... 3-29
3.2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................ 3-31
3.2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................................................... 3-36
3.2.11 Land Use and Planning............................................................................. 3-39
3.2.12 Mineral Resources .................................................................................... 3-41
3.2.13 Noise......................................................................................................... 3-42
3.2.14 Population and Housing ............................................................................ 3-47
3.2.15 Public Services ......................................................................................... 3-48
3.2.16 Recreation ................................................................................................ 3-50
3.2.17 Transportation ........................................................................................... 3-51
3.2.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ......................................................................... 3-53
3.2.19 Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................... 3-58
3.2.20 Wildfire...................................................................................................... 3-60
3.2.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................................................... 3-62 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
1-1
July 2022
Chapter 1
Introduction and Summary
1.1 Introduction
This document is an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) that addresses the potential environmental impacts of the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project (proposed project) proposed by the City of Roseville (City).
The proposed project would involve the development of a portion of the project site with an unmanned communications tower, with an associated communications building and access driveway. The project site is located east of the intersection of Strauch Drive and Huntington Drive in the City of Roseville, CA. The project site, identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 048-260-032, is undeveloped and contains several species of trees.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 15004 of the State CEQA Guidelines encourage early completion of environmental documentation to enable environmental considerations to influence project design. This IS/MND is a public information document that discloses the proposed project’s environmental effects and informs decision makers of the project’s compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
This document describes the proposed project’s background, project components, the existing environmental setting (conditions before implementation of the project), and the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. Chapter 2, Project Description, describes the proposed project and the best management practice (BMP) measures that the City has incorporated into the proposed project to avoid and minimize potential effects.
Chapter 3, Environmental Checklist, identifies the anticipated environmental impacts by topic and provides mitigation measures that would be implemented to avoid significant impacts, if warranted.
1.2 CEQA Lead Agency
As the lead agency for the proposed project under CEQA, the City of Roseville determined that preparation of an IS/MND was necessary to evaluate the environmental issues associated with the proposed project and satisfy the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The IS/MND is available for public review at the following location:
City of Roseville Permit Center
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
(916) 774-5332
City of Roseville Introduction and Summary
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
1-2
July 2022
Due to changeable circumstances regarding COVID-19 concerns, the Permit Center hours for in person document review may be limited. Therefore, the public is encouraged to check the City’s web site first to ensure in office accommodations are available:
https://www.roseville.ca.us
Alternatively, the IS/MND can also be viewed or downloaded from the City’s website via the following link:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/environmentaldocuments
During the review period, written comments may be submitted via email to:
[email protected], or sent by regular mail to:
Ms. Terri Shirhall, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville, Development Services Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
1.3 Summary
This IS/MND concludes that the proposed project would have potentially significant but mitigable impacts on biological resources, cultural resources, and tribal cultural resources, as described in Chapter 3, Environmental Checklist. This IS/MND identifies a variety of mitigation measures that the City would implement to avoid or minimize potentially significant impacts on sensitive environmental resources. Implementation of these measures, in addition to project BMPs, would further reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant level.
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-1
July 2022
Chapter 2
Project Description
2.1 Project Background
The City of Roseville proposes to allow the construction of the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project (proposed project) in the Infill Planning Area of the City of Roseville, California (see Figure 2-1). The proposed project would involve the construction of a radio communications tower, as well as an associated communications building and access roadway.
2.2 Project Location and Existing Conditions
The project site is located east of the intersection of Strauch Drive and Huntington Drive in the City of Roseville, CA. The project site (see Figure 2-2), identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 048-260-032, is undeveloped. The site contains ruderal grassland, several species of trees, including oak, along the perimeter of the site, and a drainage feature that crosses the western portion of the site. Surrounding existing land uses include shopping centers with a variety of retail and commercial uses to the north, east, and southeast; undeveloped land to the south and southwest, across Strauch Drive; and shopping centers to the west and northwest, across Strauch Drive. The City of Roseville General Plan designates the site as Community Commercial (CC) and the site is zoned as Planned Development (PD7).
2.3 Proposed Project Components
The proposed project consists of the following main components:
Construction of the proposed radio communications tower; and Operations/maintenance of the tower.
The specifications of the proposed tower are described in greater detail below.
2.3.1 Construction of the Proposed Project
The proposed project would involve construction of a 180-foot-tall radio communications tower, a 12-foot by 16-foot shelter for the on-site 70 kiloWatt emergency generator, and a 500- gallon propane tank on a portion of the project site (Figure 2-3, Figure 2-4, and Figure 2-5).
The emergency generator would be fueled by propane, and all components of the proposed project would be fenced within an approximately 2,483-square-foot enclosure. Vehicle access to the site would be provided by a new 12-foot private maintenance roadway connecting to the parking lot immediately east of the project site.
City of Roseville Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-2 July 2022 Figure 2-1 Regional Project Location Project Site City of Roseville Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-3 July 2022 Figure 2-2 Project Site City of Roseville Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-4 July 2022 Figure 2-3 Overall Site Plan City of Roseville Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-5 July 2022 Figure 2-4 Focused Site Plan City of Roseville Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project 2-6 July 2022 Figure 2-5 Tower Elevations City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-7
July 2022
Ground disturbing activities associated with construction of the proposed project would be limited to establishing the tower foundation and access road, assembly of the tower and shelter, and worker vehicle circulation. Additionally, tree removal may occur. Construction activities would take place between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Friday and between 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM Saturday and Sunday, in compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance.
2.3.2 Radio Communications Tower Operations
The proposed radio communications tower would be unmanned and would not require regular staffing. However, occasional site maintenance, including testing of the emergency generator, would be necessary. Maintenance staff would access the project site through the private easement access road that would connect to the commercial parking lot to the east of the project site.
2.4 Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Water quality measures (stormwater management measures and BMPs) would be implemented as part of the project to minimize potential water quality impacts. Key management measures consist of the following:
Protect areas that provide important water quality benefits or are particularly susceptible to erosion or sediment loss.
Minimize the potential for erosion by limiting land disturbances such as clearing, grading, and cut and fill.
Limit disturbance of natural drainage features and vegetation.
Ensure proper storage and disposal of toxic material.
Incorporate pollution prevention into operation and maintenance procedures to reduce pollutant loadings to surface runoff.
2.4.1 Construction BMPs
The City and its contractor shall implement construction BMPs to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive environmental resources. Implementation of the BMPs discussed below would minimize the potential for construction-related surface water pollution and ensure that water quality in off-site waterways and wetlands would not be compromised by erosion and sedimentation during construction.
Temporary Fencing. Where appropriate, the City’s contractor shall install construction barrier fencing (including sediment fencing and straw wattles) to prevent contaminants and debris from entering off-site surface waters. Before construction begins, the City or its contractor shall identify the locations for the barrier fencing and mark those locations with stakes or flagging.
Equipment. The City shall comply with applicable stormwater ordinances, stormwater management plans, and BMPs to prevent or minimize the potential release of equipmentrelated petroleum contaminants into adjacent surface waters and groundwater.
Implementation of standard construction procedures and precautions for working with City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-8
July 2022
petroleum and construction chemicals would further ensure that the impacts related to chemical handling during project construction would be minor.
Hazardous Materials. The City shall implement appropriate hazardous material management practices and other good housekeeping measures to reduce the potential for chemical spills or releases of contaminants, including any non-stormwater discharge to adjacent surface waters. Implementation of these measures would minimize the potential for surface and groundwater contamination.
Erosion Control. The project design shall incorporate permanent erosion control elements to ensure that stormwater runoff does not cause soil erosion. Erosion and sediment control plans shall comply with the City’s Grading Ordinance, which requires reducing erosion and retaining sediment onsite.
Toxic Materials Control and Spill Response Plan. The following measures shall be incorporated into the plan and implemented to avoid or minimize the risk of spills or discharges of toxic materials into adjacent surface waters:
Prepare a hazardous material spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan (SPCC) before construction and implement during construction;
Prevent raw cement, concrete or concrete washings, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances that could be hazardous to aquatic life from contaminating the soil or entering off-site surface waters; Prevent discharge of drilling mud and fluids into off-site surface waters by using appropriate containment, disposal, and storage methods; Prevent discharge of turbid water or sediment-laden runoff to off-site surface waters by using sediment filters, diverting the water to a settling tank, and/or implementing other erosion and water quality control BMPs;
Clean up all spills immediately according to the SPCC;
Provide areas located outside of sensitive environmental areas for staging and storing equipment, materials, fuels, lubricants, solvents, and other possible contaminants; and Prevent hazardous materials from entering waters. The construction contractor shall notify the City Fire Department if evidence of soil or groundwater contamination is encountered during construction activities. Construction in that area shall be halted until the Fire Department has evaluated the find and remediation is completed, if necessary.
2.4.1.1 Traffic Management Plan
The City shall require the construction contractor to implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP), including a construction schedule and plan to meet the City’s notice procedures, before construction activities are initiated. This plan shall identify general methods by which construction activities shall be managed to minimize substantial delays to traffic as discussed below.
Communication: Develop and implement a public information campaign that describes the nature and duration of construction activities and when construction related temporary “controlled conditions” and/or travel delays are expected. Particular attention shall be placed on special events (e.g., school graduations or Placer County Fairgrounds events) that may attract unfamiliar users to the City’s roadway system. The City is currently doing public outreach and shall continue the outreach program throughout project design and construction.
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-9
July 2022
Construction: Describe and analyze the number of employees and their site parking areas, and the number of trucks, their routing and staging, and operating hours.
Wayfinding: Position and operate changeable message sign (CMS) trailers at strategic locations and employ other temporary signage as necessary to advise motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists of pending construction activities and alternate routes.
Emergency Vehicle Response: The contractor shall coordinate with City Police and Fire Departments to ensure that all potential effects of construction traffic controls are clearly communicated understood by public safety providers.
2.4.1.2 Noise Control Measures
The following measures shall be incorporated into the construction specifications for the proposed project to reduce and control noise generated by construction-related activities, consistent with City ordinances and standards:
Noise-generating construction activities from the City’s construction contractor shall be restricted consistent with the City’s Noise Ordinance (Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, and Saturday and Sunday from 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM); All construction equipment shall have sound-control devices no less effective than those provided on the original equipment. No equipment shall have an unmuffled exhaust; and Appropriate additional noise-reducing measures shall be implemented, including the following: stationary construction equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive uses; sensitive uses shall be identified on construction drawings; and excessive equipment idling shall be prohibited when the equipment is not in use.
2.4.1.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Measures
The construction documents shall identify materials that are considered hazardous. The project contractor shall be required to develop a Health and Safety Plan (prepared by a registered industrial hygienist) that addresses release prevention measures; employee training, notification, and evacuation procedures; and adequate emergency response protocols and cleanup procedures.
The contractor shall comply with the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards for the storage and handling of fuels, flammable materials, and common construction-related hazardous materials and for fire prevention (California Labor Code, Division 5, Chapter 2.5).
2.4.2 City of Roseville Mitigating Ordinances
As part of the proposed project, the City shall implement the following regulations and ordinances to reduce potential environmental impacts associated with the project:
Noise Regulation (Roseville Municipal Code [RMC] Ch.9.24); Urban Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (RMC Ch.14.20);
Stormwater Quality Design Manual (Resolution 07-432);
City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards (Resolution 07-137); and Community Design Guidelines (Resolution 95-347).
City of Roseville Project Description
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
2-10
July 2022
2.5 Required Entitlements
Required permits and approvals are shown in Table 2-1. Local approvals required to construct and operate the proposed project include adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan by the City Council and approval of the project plans and specifications and construction contract. The City must also submit applications to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to reflect the new site coordinates.
Table 2-1: Permits and Approvals Needed for the Proposed Project Agency Permit/Approval
City of Roseville Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Roseville Approval of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan City of Roseville Approval of Plans and Specifications and Construction Contract FCC Approval of New Site Coordinates
FAA Approval of New Site Coordinates
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-1
July 2022
Chapter 3
Environmental Checklist
1. Project Title: East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency and Daily Operational Services Project
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Terri Shirhall
Environmental Coordinator
Development Services Department
(916) 774-5362
4. Project Location: The project site, identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 048-260-032, is located east of the intersection of
Strauch Drive and Huntington Drive in the City of
Roseville, CA.
5. Project Sponsor’s Name and
Address:
City of Roseville Department of Information Technology
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer, Information
Technology
316 Vernon Street, Suite 300
Roseville, CA 95678
6. General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC)
7. Zoning: Planned Development (PD7)
8. Description of Project:
The proposed project would include the development of a portion of the project site with a 180-foottall radio communications tower, a 12-foot by 16-foot shelter, a 60-kiloWatt emergency generator, and 500-gallon propane tank. An access driveway would be provided from the parking lot of the adjacent property to the east. Ground disturbing activities associated with construction of the proposed project would be limited to establishing the tower foundation, assembly of the tower and shelter, and worker vehicle circulation.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
The site contains several species of trees, including oak, along the perimeter of the site, and a drainage feature crosses the western portion of the site. Surrounding existing land uses include shopping centers with a variety of retail and commercial uses to the north, east, and southeast; undeveloped land to the south and southwest, across Strauch Drive; and shopping centers to the west and northwest, across Strauch Drive.
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required:
None.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-2
July 2022
11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun?
On March 29, 2022, the City of Roseville sent certified letters to the Tribes listed below requesting consultation and/or information regarding tribal resources in the project area. The letters requested a response within 30 days. The United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC) initiated consultation on June 3, 2022, and consultation was closed with mutual agreement on July 7, 2022. Wilton Rancheria also requested consultation on May 3, 2022, but did not respond to the City’s attempts at communication, therefore the City closed consultation on July 8, 2022.
United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria; Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians;
Tsi Akim Maidu;
Ione Band of Miwok Indians; and
Wilton Rancheria.
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would potentially be affected by this project (i.e., the project would involve at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact”), as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agricultural and
Forestry
Air Quality Biological Resources
Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water
Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities/Service
Systems
Mandatory Findings
of Significance
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-4
July 2022
3.2.1 Aesthetics
I. Aesthetics
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings along a
scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect daytime or
nighttime views in the area?
3.2.1.1 Discussion
a,b. Examples of typical scenic vistas include mountain ranges, ridgelines, or bodies of water as viewed from a highway, public space, or other area designated for the express purpose of viewing and sightseeing. Per the City’s General Plan EIR, the City’s Panning Area does not contain any scenic vistas or any designated or eligible State scenic highways. Thus, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista or substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway, and no impact would occur.
c. The project is located in an urbanized area of the City of Roseville; therefore, in accordance with CEQA question ‘c’, the relevant threshold is whether the project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, rather than whether the project would substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings. Nonetheless, photo simulations of the proposed project have been prepared, and are included as Figure 3-1 and Figure 3-2.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-5
July 2022
Figure 3-1
Views from Strauch Drive Looking Northwest
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-6
July 2022
Figure 3-2
Views from Douglas Boulevard Looking Southeast
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-7
July 2022
As shown in Figure 3-1 and Figure 3-2, the visual landscape of the surrounding area is characterized by commercial development, with shopping centers to the west, north, and east, and undeveloped land to the south. The proposed radio communications tower would stand approximately 180 feet above ground level. Public views of the top of the tower would be available from Douglas Boulevard from the north, Rocky Ridge Drive from the east, and Strauch Drive from the south. As shown in the photo simulations, the base of the tower and the communications building would be screened from public view by the trees along Strauch Drive, and the commercial buildings to the north and east. Given the urbanized and commercial nature of the area, the proposed project would be generally consistent with the visual character of the project vicinity.
According to Section 19.34.010 of the RMC, the regulations and prohibitions in Chapter
19.34, Antennas and Communications Facilities, are intended to minimize the adverse impacts of such equipment and structures on neighborhoods and surrounding developments by limiting the height, number, and location of such devices. The proposed project’s required compliance with such would ensure that substantial adverse impacts related to aesthetics do not occur. For example, all wireless communication facilities would be required to be painted colors which are compatible with their surroundings. In addition, a radio communications tower is an allowed use under the CC land use and PD7 zoning designations. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with applicable zoning and other regulations governing antennas and communications facilities in the City of Roseville.
Based on the above, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the project site’s current land use and zoning designations and other regulations governing scenic quality, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. d. The existing nighttime lighting environment in the project area is defined by light from Strauch Drive and the surrounding shopping centers, including sources such as streetlights, headlights from vehicles, lighted street signs, and traffic signals. The proposed radio communications tower has the potential to introduce new sources of light in the project vicinity. The communications building would not be occupied, and thus would not be expected to produce light on a regular basis. The only light associated with the tower itself would most likely be affixed to the radio communication tower’s highest point.
The light source would be located approximately 180 feet in the air, and would be necessary for safety purposes. Thus, the light would not cause a substantial increase in light or glare in the project surroundings.
Based on the above, the proposed radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank, would not substantially alter the existing lighting in the project area. In addition, the tower would comply with all applicable lighting standards established in the RMC. Therefore, the proposed project would result in less-than-significant impacts related to creating a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-8
July 2022
3.2.1.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to aesthetic resources. Therefore, mitigation measures are not necessary.
3.2.1.3 References
Vosney, Jack, President for Advancesim Inc. Personal Communication [email] with Rod Stinson, Vice President of Raney Planning & Management, Inc. June 28, 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-9
July 2022
3.2.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use or conflict with a Williamson Act
contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment that, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
3.2.2.1 Discussion
a-e. The project site currently consists of undeveloped ruderal grassland, as well as several trees along the site perimeter, and drainage feature. According to the California Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site is designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” and does not contain any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Thus, the project site would not be converted from Farmland to non-agricultural uses as a result of the proposed project.
The project site is currently designated CC per the City’s General Plan and zoned PD7.
Consequently, the project site is not zoned for agricultural uses, and the site is not under a Williamson Act Contract. Forest land and timberland do not occur within the City of Roseville. Thus, the project site is not considered forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220[g]) and is not zoned for Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104[g]). Overall, the proposed project would result in no impact to agricultural and forestry resources.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-10
July 2022
3.2.2.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to agricultural and forestry resources. Therefore, mitigation measures are not necessary.
3.2.2.3 References
California Department of Conservation. 2016. California Important Farmland Finder.
Available: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-11
July 2022
3.2.3 Air Quality
III. Air Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
When available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b. Cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is a
nonattainment area for an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard?
c. Exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Other emissions (such as those leading to odors)
adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
3.2.3.1 Discussion
a,b. The project site is located within the Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB) and is under the jurisdiction of the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). The SVAB is designated nonattainment for the federal particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) and the State particulate matter 10 microns in diameter (PM10) standards, as well as for both the federal and State ozone standards. The federal Clean Air Act requires areas designated as federal nonattainment to prepare an air quality control plan referred to as the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP contains the strategies and control measures for states to use to attain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
The SIP is periodically modified to reflect the latest emissions inventories, planning documents, rules, and regulations of air basins as reported by the agencies with jurisdiction over them. In compliance with regulations, the PCAPCD periodically prepares and updates air quality plans that provide emission reduction strategies to achieve attainment of the NAAQS, including control strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions via regulations, incentive programs, public education, and partnerships with other agencies.
The current applicable air quality plan for the project area is the Sacramento Regional 2009 NAAQS 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (Ozone Attainment Plan), updated July 24, 2017. The Ozone Attainment Plan demonstrates how existing and new control strategies would provide the necessary future emission reductions to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements, including the federal AAQS.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-12
July 2022
The Ozone Attainment Plan demonstrates how existing and new control strategies would provide the necessary future emission reductions to meet the FCAA requirements, including the NAAQS. It should be noted that in addition to strengthening the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) also strengthened the secondary 8-hour ozone NAAQS, making the secondary standard identical to the primary standard. The SVAB remains classified as a severe nonattainment area for ozone with an attainment deadline of 2027. On October 26, 2015, the USEPA released a final implementation rule for the revised NAAQS for ozone to address the requirements for reasonable further progress, modeling and attainment demonstrations, and reasonably available control measures (RACM) and reasonably available control technology (RACT).
On April 30, 2018, the USEPA published designations for areas in attainment/unclassifiable for the 2015 ozone standards. The USEPA identified the portions of Placer County within the SVAB as nonattainment for the 2015 ozone standards. Due to the designation of the SVAB as nonattainment for the 2015 standards, the PCAPCD will work with other regional air districts to prepare a new ozone SIP for the revised 2015 standards.
General conformity requirements of the regional air quality plan include whether a project would cause or contribute to new violations of any AAQS, increase the frequency or severity of an existing violation of any AAQS, or delay timely attainment of any AAQS. In order to evaluate ozone and other criteria air pollutant emissions and support attainment goals for those pollutants that the area is designated nonattainment, the PCAPCD has adopted recommended thresholds of significance for emissions of PM10 and the ozone precursors reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX). On October 13, 2016, the PCAPCD adopted updated significance thresholds for the aforementioned pollutants.
The significance thresholds, expressed in pounds per day (lbs/day), listed in Table 3.2.3- 1 are the PCAPCD’s current thresholds of significance for use in the evaluation of air quality impacts associated with proposed development projects. Thus, if the proposed project’s emissions exceed the pollutant thresholds presented in Table 3.2.3-1, the project could have a significant effect on air quality, the attainment of federal and State AAQS, and could conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.
Table 3.2.3-1. PCAPCD Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Construction Threshold (lbs/day) Operational Threshold (lbs/day) ROG 82 55
NOX 82 55
PM10 82 82
Source: Placer County Air Pollution Control District. CEQA Handbook. 2017.
Construction activity associated with the proposed project would be limited to relatively minor ground disturbance to construct the proposed tower foundation, minor utility improvements, and installation of the proposed radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank. Given that such activities would result in relatively minor emissions of criteria pollutants, the proposed project is anticipated to be below the PCAPCD thresholds for construction City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-13
July 2022
emissions. The only emissions that could occur during project operations would be associated with maintenance testing of the emergency generator, and vehicle trips associated with site maintenance and refilling of the on-site propane tank. The emergency generator would only operate for intermittent testing and during emergency situations.
Thus, the proposed project would not result in substantial operational emissions.
Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. A single project is not sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of AAQS. Because the proposed project would not result in emissions above the applicable thresholds of significance for ROG, NOX, or PM10, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS.
Because the proposed project would not result in construction-related or operational emissions of criteria air pollutants in excess of PCAPCD’s thresholds of significance, conflicts with or obstruction of the implementation of the applicable regional air quality plans would not occur. In addition, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would result.
c. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others, due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Heightened sensitivity may be caused by health problems, proximity to the emissions source, and/or duration of exposure to air pollutants. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with existing health problems are especially vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. Sensitive receptors are typically defined as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (i.e., children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. Accordingly, land uses that are typically considered to be sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, retirement homes, convalescent homes, hospitals, and medical clinics. The nearest existing sensitive receptors would be the single-family residences approximately 400 feet west of the project site.
The major pollutant concentrations of concern are localized carbon monoxide (CO) emissions and toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions.
Localized Carbon Monoxide Emissions
As discussed in Section 3.2.17, Transportation, of this IS/MND, the proposed project is not anticipated to increase traffic to local roadways except during the construction period.
Increases in vehicle traffic resulting from the proposed project would be minor and would only occur during the installation of the proposed radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank. As such, based on the PCAPCD screening criteria, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to localized CO emissions concentrations and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of localized CO.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-14
July 2022
TAC Emissions
Another category of environmental concern is TACs. The CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (Handbook) provides recommended setback distances for sensitive land uses from major sources of TACs, including, but not limited to, freeways and high traffic roads, distribution centers, and rail yards. The CARB has identified diesel particulate matter (DPM) from diesel-fueled engines as a TAC; thus, high volume freeways, stationary diesel engines, and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic are identified as having the highest associated health risks from DPM. Health risks associated with TACs are a function of both the concentration of emissions and the duration of exposure, where the higher the concentration and/or the longer the period of time that a sensitive receptor is exposed to pollutant concentrations would correlate to a higher health risk.
The proposed project does not include any operations that would be considered a substantial source of TACs. As noted previously, an emergency generator would exist onsite. Diesel-powered generators are known to emit DPM during operations. However, the emergency generator would be fueled by propane, and would only operate during occasional testing and emergency situations when grid power is not available.
Accordingly, operations of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to excess concentrations of TACs.
Short-term, construction-related activities could result in the generation of TACs, specifically DPM, from on-road haul trucks and off-road equipment exhaust emissions.
Construction is temporary and occurs over a relatively short duration in comparison to the operational lifetime of the proposed project. Health risks are typically associated with exposure to high concentrations of TACs over extended periods of time (e.g., 30 years or greater), whereas the construction period associated with the proposed project would occur over a substantially shorter period of time. All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation, which is intended to help reduce emissions associated with off-road diesel vehicles and equipment, including DPM. Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable PCAPCD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources.
Due to the temporary nature of construction, and the relatively short duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, the potential for any one sensitive receptor in the area to be exposed to concentrations of pollutants for a substantially extended period of time would be low. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not be expected to expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Conclusion
Based on the above, the proposed project would not expose any sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of pollutants, including localized CO or TACs, during construction or operation. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-thansignificant impact related to the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-15
July 2022
D. Emissions of pollutants have the potential to adversely affect sensitive receptors within the project area. Pollutants of principal concern include emissions leading to odors, emissions of dust, or emissions considered to constitute air pollutants. Air pollutants have been discussed in sections “a” through “c” above. Therefore, the following discussion focuses on emissions of odors and dust during construction and operation of the project.
Odors
Odors are generally regarded as an annoyance rather than a health hazard. Due to the subjective nature of odor impacts, the number of variables that can influence the potential for an odor impact, and the variety of odor sources, quantitative methodologies to determine the presence of a significant odor impact do not exist. Certain land uses such as wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, confined animal facilities, composting operations, food manufacturing plants, refineries, and chemical plants have the potential to generate considerable odors.
Diesel fumes from construction equipment and heavy-duty trucks could be found to be objectionable; however, as addressed above, operation of construction equipment would be regulated by PCAPCD rules and regulations, restricted to certain hours per the RMC, and would occur intermittently throughout the course of a day. All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the statewide In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation. In addition, construction is temporary, and construction equipment would operate intermittently throughout the course of a day and would likely only occur over portions of the improvement area at a time. For the aforementioned reasons, and due to the distance between the project site and the nearest sensitive receptors, the project would not result in any noticeable objectionable odors associated with construction.
Although offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they can be unpleasant, leading to citizen complaints to local governments and air districts. Diesel-powered equipment operating during construction may generate odors that are evident in the immediately surrounding area. Such activities would be intermittent and temporary in duration and, therefore, would not result in nuisance odors. Radio communications towers are not known to emit odors during operation, and the project does not meet any of the facility types identified by CARB or PCAPCD as odor-generating; thus, the project would not generate substantial operational odors. Accordingly, the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.
Dust
As noted previously, construction of projects within Placer County are required to comply with all applicable PCAPCD rules and regulations. The aforementioned rules would act to reduce construction-related dust by implementing dust control measures. PCAPCD Rule 228 requires implementation of dust control measures, such as minimizing track-out on to paved public roadways, limiting vehicle travel on unpaved surfaces to 15 miles per hour, and stabilization of storage piles and disturbed areas. Following construction, operation of the proposed radio communications tower would not involve vehicles regularly operating within the project site. Furthermore, the access road is anticipated to be paved and, City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-16
July 2022
therefore, maintenance vehicles visiting the site would not generate substantial dust.
Thus, the proposed project operations would not include sources of dust that could adversely affect a substantial number of people.
Conclusion
For the aforementioned reasons, construction and operation of the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts would be less than significant.
3.2.3.2 Mitigation Measures
Due to the short duration of construction, and minimal ground disturbance, the proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts on air quality. Therefore, mitigation measures are not necessary.
3.2.3.3 References
California Air Resources Board. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April 2005.
California Air Resources Board. 2020. Area Designations Maps. Available at:
<http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm>. Accessed October 2021.
Placer County Air Pollution Control District. 2017 CEQA Handbook. November 2017.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-17
July 2022
3.2.4 Biological Resources
IV. Biological Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special-status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or ordinance
(including essential fish habitat)?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
habitat conservation plan, natural community
conservation plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
3.2.4.1 Discussion
a. The project site currently consists of ruderal grasses and several trees. A search of the Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) was conducted for the project area to identify the presence of special-status species.
According to the CNDDB search, a total of 17 special-status wildlife species are known to occur in the project area.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-18
July 2022
As noted previously, the project site is regularly disced for vegetation maintenance. The regular disturbance associated with discing eliminates the possibility that special-status plant species would occur on the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not adversely affect special-status plant species.
Of the 17 special-status wildlife species that are known to occur in the project area, four have the potential to occur on the project site based on the habitat available on-site.
Because the proposed project could involve the removal of trees, special-status bird species that nest in trees would have the potential to be impacted during construction. The nesting bird species with the potential to occur on the project site are the Swainson’s hawk, grasshopper sparrow, golden eagle, and white-tailed kite. As such, a potentially significant impact could occur to nesting bird species. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce such impacts to a less-than-significant level.
Based on the above, with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse effect to any special-status species; thus, the impact would be considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b,c,d,f. A drainage feature exists in the western portion of the project site. The drainage is intermittent and seasonal, and does not qualify as wetland or as supporting riparian habitat. Furthermore, implementation of the project would occur on the eastern portion of the project site and, thus, the project would not affect the on-site drainage. In addition, the project site does not support any wildlife movement corridors, and is located in a highly urbanized area. The project site and the surrounding areas do not contain waterways that could be used by migratory fish or as a wildlife corridor for other wildlife species. The project would not conflict with the City’s Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan, or would otherwise impact habitat areas subject to regulatory oversight.
Based on the above, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse effect to protected riparian habitats or wetlands, would not interfere with the movement of fish or wildlife species, and would not conflict with any conservation plan; thus, a less-thansignificant impact would occur. e. Several trees exist on the project site. Buildout of the proposed project has the potential to involve the removal of one or more of the trees. However, through compliance with Section 19.66.030 of the RMC (Tree Preservation Ordinance), which delineates the permits required for the removal of trees, and required replacement either via tree planting or contribution to the City’s Tree Mitigation Fund, the proposed project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources.
Given compliance with the applicable local regulations regarding tree removal, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to conflict with local tree preservation policies.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-19
July 2022
3.2.4.2 Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Implement Measures to Protect Protected Bird Species If tree removal or other ground-disturbing activities are to begin during the breeding/nesting season for raptors or other protected bird species in the region (generally February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall be retained by the City to conduct pre-construction surveys in areas of suitable nesting habitat within two weeks prior to initiation of tree removal or ground disturbance. The pre-construction surveys shall be submitted to the City’s Planning Division. If active nests are not found, further mitigation is not required. If active nests are found, the construction contractor shall avoid impacts on such nests by establishing a no-disturbance buffer around the nest. The appropriate buffer size for all nesting birds shall be determined by a qualified biologist. Buffer size will vary depending on site-specific conditions, the species of nesting bird, nature of the project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, visibility of the disturbance from the nest site, and other relevant circumstances. Construction activity shall not occur within the buffer area of an active nest and nests shall be monitored by a qualified biologist until a qualified biologist confirms that the chicks have fledged and are no longer dependent on the nest, or the nesting cycle has otherwise completed. Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during construction activities shall be required if the activity has the potential to adversely affect the nest.
3.2.4.3 References
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. CNDDB Rarefind 5. Available at:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data. Accessed April 2022.
Placer County. Placer County Conservation Program. Available at:
https://www.placer.ca.gov/3362/Placer-County-Conservation-Program. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-20
July 2022
3.2.5 Cultural Resources
V. Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
3.2.5.1 Discussion
a-c. Historical resources are features that are associated with the lives of historically important persons and/or historically significant events, that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to the pre-history or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Examples of typical historical resources include, but are not limited to, buildings, farmsteads, rail lines, bridges, and trash scatters containing objects such as colored glass and ceramics.
The proposed project would involve the installation of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank.
Ground disturbing activities associated with implementation of the proposed project would be limited to construction of the foundations of the tower and associated building, assembly of the tower and shelter, as well as construction of an access roadway. Given that the project site is located in an urbanized area, the discovery of previously-unknown historical resources during the limited ground disturbance associated with the proposed project is not anticipated.
A records search for the project site and the surrounding 0.25-mile radius was conducted by staff at the North Central Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System on April 7, 2022. The records search indicated that seven previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within the search area. The records search did not identify any recorded cultural resources on the project site or within the
0.25-mile radius.
Furthermore, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted on April 6, 2022, to request a search of its Sacred Lands File and a list of interested Native American tribes and individuals. The results of the NAHC’s Sacred Lands File search did not indicate the presence of any known cultural resources on the project site. Assembly City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-21
July 2022
Bill (AB 52) tribal consultation efforts under CEQA were carried out by the City of Roseville and additional information is provided in Section 3.2.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, of this Environmental Checklist.
Due to previous disturbance of the site associated with regular discing of on-site vegetation, and the limited extent of ground disturbance associated with the proposed project, the likelihood of discovering previously unknown historical or archaeological resources and/or human remains is low. However, the possibility exists that grounddisturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown subsurface cultural resources; such disturbance would be a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level.
Based on the above, with implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical or archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5, and would not result in the disturbance of human remains; thus, the impact would be considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
3.2.5.2 Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Implement Measures to Protect Previously Unidentified Cultural Resources
The City shall ensure that construction specifications include the following information in the grading notes:
Construction shall stop if potential cultural resources are encountered. It is possible that previous activities have obscured surface evidence of cultural resources. If signs of an archeological site, such as any unusual amounts of stone, bone, or shell, are uncovered during grading or other construction activities, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the find and the City of Roseville will be notified. A qualified archeologist shall be consulted for an onsite evaluation. If the site appears to be eligible for listing in State or federal registers, additional mitigation, such as further testing for evaluation or data recovery, may be necessary.
In the event resources are discovered, the City shall retain a qualified archaeologist to assess the find and to determine whether the resource requires further study. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms and evaluated for significance under all applicable regulatory criteria.
All work shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find, and, if the find is determined to be an important cultural resource, the City shall make available contingency funding and a time allotment sufficient to allow recovery of an archaeological sample or to implement an avoidance measure. Construction work may continue on other parts of the project while archaeological mitigation takes place.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-22
July 2022
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Implement Measures if Construction Activities Inadvertently Discover or Disturb Human Remains
The City shall ensure that construction specifications include the following in the grading notes:
If human remains are discovered during any phase of construction, including disarticulated or cremated remains, the construction contractor shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within 100 feet of the remains and notify the City of Roseville.
In accordance with California State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the following steps have been completed:
The County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.
If the remains are determined by the County Coroner to be Native American, NAHC will be notified within 24 hours, and the treatment and disposition of the remains will comply with NAHC guidelines.
It is further recommended that a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), if any, identified by NAHC. As necessary and appropriate, a professional archaeologist may provide technical assistance to the MLD, including excavation and removal of the human remains.
3.2.5.3 References
Native American Heritage Commission. Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project, Placer County. April 19, 2022.
North Central Information Center. Records Search Results for Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project; NCIC File No.: PLA-22-35. April 7, 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-23
July 2022
3.2.6 Energy
VI. Energy
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
3.2.6.1 Discussion
a,b. The main forms of available energy supply are electricity, natural gas, and oil. A description of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code and the Building Energy Efficiency Standards, with which the proposed project would be required to comply, as well as discussions regarding the proposed project’s potential effects related to energy demand during construction and operations are provided below.
The 2019 California Building Standards Code (CBSC), otherwise known as the CAL Green Code (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 24, Part 11), became effective on January 1, 2020. The purpose of the CAL Green Code is to improve public health, safety, and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices. The CBSC standards regulate the method of use, properties, performance, types of materials used in construction, alteration repair, improvement and rehabilitation of a structure or improvement to property.
Construction
Construction of the proposed project would involve on-site energy demand and consumption related to the use of oil in the form of gasoline and diesel fuel for construction worker vehicle trips, and hauling and material delivery truck trips. In addition, diesel-fueled portable generators may be necessary to provide additional electricity demands for temporary on-site lighting, welding, and for supplying energy to areas of the site where energy supply cannot be met via a hookup to the existing electricity grid. Project construction would not involve the use of natural gas appliances or equipment.
Compliance with local, State, and federal regulations, which limit engine idling times and require recycling construction debris, would reduce short-term energy demand during the project’s construction to the extent feasible and project construction would not result in a wasteful or inefficient use of energy.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-24
July 2022
The CARB has prepared the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update (2017 Scoping Plan), which builds upon previous efforts to reduce GHG emissions and is designed to continue to shift the California economy away from dependence on fossil fuels. Appendix B of the 2017 Scoping Plan includes examples of local actions (municipal code changes, zoning changes, policy directions, and mitigation measures) that would support the State’s climate goals. The examples provided include, but are not limited to, enforcing idling time restrictions for construction vehicles, utilizing existing grid power for electric energy rather than operating temporary gasoline/diesel-powered generators, and increasing use of electric and renewable fuel-powered construction equipment.
Based on the above, the temporary increase in energy use occurring during construction of the proposed project would not result in a significant increase in peak or base demands or require additional capacity from local or regional energy supplies.
Operational
State and local authorities regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. Regulations at the State level are intended to reduce energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The proposed project would comply with these regulations that include, among others, AB 1493–Light-duty Vehicle Standards, CCR Title 24, Part 6–Energy Efficiency Standards, and CCR Title 24.
Following implementation of the proposed project, Roseville Electric Utility would provide electricity to the project site. Apart from electricity consumed as part of the daily operation of the proposed radio communications tower, the only other energy required by the project would be for the propane-fueled backup generator, which would run only in emergency situations and/or during brief maintenance tests occurring periodically. Operations of a backup generator in emergency situations would not be considered unnecessary and/or wasteful.
Electricity supplied to the project by Roseville Electric Utility would comply with the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires investor-owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 60 percent by 2030. Thus, a portion of the energy consumed during project operations would originate from renewable sources.
Conclusion
Based on the above, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources or conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Thus, a lessthan-significant impact would occur.
3.2.6.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to energy; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-25
July 2022
3.2.6.3 References
California Air Resources Board. 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. January 20, 2017.
California Building Standards Commission. California Green Building Standards Code. 2019.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-26
July 2022
3.2.7 Geology and Soils
VII. Geology and Soils
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
Strong seismic ground shaking?
Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss
of topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable or that would become unstable as a
result of the project and potentially result in
an onsite or offsite landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or
collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems in
areas where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
3.2.7.1 Discussion
a-d. Per the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update EIR, the City is located in an area with relatively low seismic activity, and fault traces are not located either within or immediately adjacent to the City’s Planning Area. The project site is not located within a State- City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-27
July 2022
designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone. The nearest active faults are the Cordelia Fault and Green Valley Fault, located approximately 60 miles southwest of the project site, and the Hunting Creek Fault, located approximately 60 miles west of the project site. Thus, the potential for fault rupture risk at the project site is low.
An earthquake of moderate to high magnitude generated by the above faults could cause considerable ground shaking at the project site. However, the proposed project would be properly engineered in accordance with the CBSC, which includes engineering standards appropriate for the seismic area in which the project site is located. Proper engineering of the proposed project would ensure that the project would not be subject to substantial risks related to seismic ground shaking.
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Web Soil Survey, soils at the project site have been identified as 96.7 percent CometaFiddyment complex, and 3.3 percent Inks-Exchequer complex. The on-site soils have a low shrink-swell potential, and were not determined to have low strength. Thus, the aforementioned soil features do not represent a significant limitation related to the excavation required to construct the foundation for the proposed radio communication tower. Nonetheless, prior to development of the proposed project, a project-specific geotechnical report would be prepared in order to ensure that all geological hazards are adequately addressed. Thus, the aforementioned soil features do not represent a significant limitation on the shallow excavation required to construct the foundation for the proposed project.
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which granular material is transformed from a solid state to a liquefied state as a consequence of increased pore-water pressure and reduced effective stress. Per the Web Soil Survey, Cometa-Fiddyment complex and InksExchequer complex are considered well-draining soils and, thus, liquefaction is not anticipated to occur on the project site. Seismically-induced landslides are triggered by earthquake ground shaking. Lateral spreading and subsidence are also geological hazards of concern; however, the project site is generally flat and not located near an active fault zone or soils subject to such hazards, and, thus, implementation of the proposed project on the project site would not induce risks associated with liquefaction, landslide, lateral spreading, or subsidence.
Based on the above, the proposed project would not be subject to substantial risks related to liquefaction, landslides, lateral spreading, and subsidence/settlement. Compliance with standard construction regulations included in the CBSC would ensure that the proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving liquefaction, subsidence, or settlement, and would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur. e. The construction or operation of septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems is not included as part of the project. Therefore, no impact regarding the capability of soil to adequately support the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would occur.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-28
July 2022
f. As previously discussed, the project site is located in an urbanized and highly disturbed area, and the proposed project would not result in substantial ground disturbing activities.
In addition, the City of Roseville General Plan EIR evaluated buildout of the entire General Plan, and found that impacts related to paleontological resources and unique geological resources would be less-than-significant with the implementation of mitigation. Thus, additional implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-2 would ensure that significant impacts do not occur. Therefore, the project would not result in directly or indirectly destroying paleontological resources and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
3.2.7.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to geology and soils; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.
3.2.7.3 References
California Geological Survey. 2019. EQ Zapp: California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Available: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville. 2035 General Plan Update Final EIR. August 5, 2020.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey.
Available at: https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.
Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-29
July 2022
3.2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
3.2.8.1 Discussion
a,b. Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on Earth. An individual project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts.
Implementation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to increases of GHG emissions. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, and utilities (electricity and natural gas). The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source emissions during construction. The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e/yr).
As discussed in Section 3.2.3, Air Quality, the PCAPCD has the primary responsibility for air quality management in Placer County. PCAPCD has adopted a de minimis threshold of 1,100 MTCO2e/yr for operation of land use development projects, such as new residential and commercial projects. The PCAPCD also has a bright line threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e, where land use development projects in excess of the de minimis threshold (1,100 MTCO2e) can be found less than cumulatively considerable if the emission intensity (emissions per capita) meets certain criteria.
It should be noted that construction GHG emissions are a one-time release and are, therefore, not typically expected to generate a significant contribution to global climate change. Construction activities associated with implementation of the proposed project would include constructing a foundation, assembly of the proposed radio communications City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-30
July 2022
tower and associated shelter, and installation of the access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank. Because the use of heavy equipment would be limited and the overall construction period would be short in comparison to other development projects in the City, the emissions of construction-related GHG would be less than significant.
During operations, the only GHG emissions associated with the proposed project would be emissions associated with electricity generation necessary to power the proposed radio communications tower, as well as use of the propane-powered emergency backup generator. The electricity generated by Roseville Electric Utility would comply with the State RPS and, thus, would be carbon neutral by the year 2045. In addition, the proposed radio communications tower would not result in a change to regional vehicle miles travelled (VMT). Consequently, operation and maintenance of the proposed project would not result in significant emissions of GHGs.
Based on the above, the proposed project would not be considered to generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, or conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
3.2.8.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in significant impacts related to GHG emissions; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.
3.2.8.3 References
Placer County Air Pollution Control District. 2017 CEQA Handbook. November 2017.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-31
July 2022
3.2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site that is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land
use plan area or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, be within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, and result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project
area?
f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
g. Expose people or structures, either directly
or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or death involving wildland fires?
3.2.9.1 Discussion
a,b. During both construction and operations, the proposed radio communications tower, associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank would not require the routine transport, use, disposal, or generation of substantial amounts of hazardous materials and chemicals that would represent a substantial risk to public health City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-32
July 2022
or the environment. A 500-gallon propane tank would be present on the project site.
According to the HUD Exchange Acceptable Separation Distance Assessment Tool, which is a standardized tool that can be used for evaluating impacts associated with aboveground storage tanks, the acceptable separation distance (ASD) of the propane tank for thermal radiation for people is approximately 207 feet, and the ASD for thermal radiation for buildings is approximately 36 feet. Because the nearest building is approximately 100 feet away from the project site, and the nearest single-family residences are approximately 400 feet from the project site, adverse impacts associated with the proposed propane tank would not occur. In addition, given compliance with CCR Section 4650, Storage, Handling, and Use of Cylinders, which delineates the appropriate storage of propane gas, the propane tank would not result in a significant environmental impact.
Construction activities associated with the proposed project would involve the use of heavy equipment, which would contain fuels and oils, and various other products such as concrete, paints, and adhesives. Small quantities of potentially toxic substances (e.g., petroleum and other chemicals used to operate and maintain construction equipment) would be used at the project site and transported to and from the site during construction.
However, the project contractor would be required to comply with all California Health and Safety Codes and local City ordinances regulating the handling, storage, and transportation of hazardous and toxic materials. Thus, construction of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment.
During project operation, the proposed tower would emit radio frequency electromagnetic energy (RF-EME) in the project vicinity. For RF-EME sources such as the proposed antennas, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. The MPE limits for RF-EME emissions are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. The limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health.
Importantly, Section 332, subdivision (c)(7)(B)(iv), of the Telecommunications Act provides:
No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless services facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.
As presented above, federal telecommunications jurisprudence has established that municipalities cannot regulate in the area of RF-EME emissions in any way.
The proposed project would not be manned during operations. As such, the project would not result in occupational exposures to RF-EME emissions. With respect to the general public, personal communication facilities (PCF) operate within a frequency range of 700 City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-33
July 2022
to 1,900 megahertz (MHz). PCFs typically consist of: (1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and (2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCF telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by way of coaxial cables.
Because of the short wavelength of PCF services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good propagation and are typically installed aboveground. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or sky. Such a design, combined with the low-power PCFs, generally eliminates the possibility for exposure to approach MPE levels allowed under the FCC, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. Given that the antennas would be installed at the top of the proposed 180-foot tower, the general public would not be exposed to MPE levels of RF-EME emissions.
Based on the above, the proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable provisions of the California Health and Safety Code, CCR Section 4650, and the FCC. In addition, development of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment, and a less-thansignificant impact would occur. c. The closest school to the project site is Warren T. Eich Middle School, located approximately 0.5-mile southwest of the project site. Thus, the project site is not located within a quarter mile of any existing or proposed schools. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact related to hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
d. According to the Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Envirostor Database, the project site is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Thus, the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment related to being located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and no impact would occur. e. The nearest airport to the project site is the Sacramento McClellan Airport, located approximately 10 miles southwest of the project site. Thus, the project site is not located within two miles of any public airports, and does not fall within an airport land use plan area. Therefore, no impact would occur related to the project being located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, thereby resulting in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.
f. The proposed project would involve the installation of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank.
The proposed access roadway would be private and would be constructed in compliance with all State and local regulations; thus, the access roadway would not adversely affect emergency access or emergency evacuation efforts. As a result, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact with respect to impairing the implementation of or City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-34
July 2022
physically interfering with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
g. Issues related to wildfire hazards are discussed in Section 3.2.20, Wildfire, of this IS/MND.
As noted therein, the project site is not located within or near a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). In addition, the project site is located within a developed area of the City and, thus, is not particularly susceptible to wildland fire.
Project construction would involve the use of heavy equipment, welding, and other activities that have the potential to ignite fires. Malfunction of equipment that could cause a fire is extremely unlikely during project construction. However, the contractor would comply with Cal-OSHA standards for the storage and handling of fuels, flammable materials, and common construction-related hazardous materials and for fire prevention.
In addition, the project would meet the minimum standards set forth by Public Resources Code Section 4290, Title 14, for fire protection and emergency water standards.
Compliance with the aforementioned regulations would ensure that the potential for wildland fires is reduced to the maximum extent feasible.
Based on the above, the potential for wildland fires to reach the project site would be limited. Based on the above, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
3.2.9.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.
3.2.9.3 References
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer.
Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed April 2022.
California Department of Industrial Relations. California Code of Regulations Section 4650. Storage, Handling, and Use of Cylinders. Available at:
https://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/4650.html#:~:text=(b)%20Inside%20of%20buildings%2C ,such%20as%20oil%20or%20excelsior. Accessed May 2022.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2020. Cortese List: Section 65962.5(a). Available at: https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/section-65962- 5a/. Accessed April 2022.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2020. EnviroStor Hazardous Waste and Substance Site List (Cortese). Available at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?global_id=31400006. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville. 2017. Location of Roseville Fire Stations. Roseville, California. Available at: https://www.roseville.ca.us/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-35
July 2022
/Departments/Fire%20Dept/Fire%20Station%20Locations/Location%20of%20Rosevi lle%20Fire%20Stations%20-%202017.pdf. Accessed April 2022.
EBI Consulting. Radio Frequency – Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report. August 4, 2020.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Acceptable Separation Distance Electronic Assessment Tool. Available at:
https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/asd-calculator/.
Accessed June 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-36
July 2022
3.2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
X. Hydrology and Water Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground
water quality?
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces in a manner which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site;
ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff; or
iv.impede or redirect flood flows?
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
3.2.10.1 Discussion
a. As noted previously, the project would not include substantial ground disturbing activities.
The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) regulates stormwater discharges associated with construction activities where clearing, grading, or excavation results in a land disturbance of one or more acres. Given that the proposed project would disturb less than one acre of land, the proposed construction activities would not be subject to City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-37
July 2022
applicable SWRCB regulations. The ground disturbance associated with the proposed project would be minimal and would occur over a short period of time, and the contractor would be required to comply with the City BMPs listed in Section 2.4 of this document.
Such BMPs include erosion control and hazardous material control measures that would ensure that adverse impacts related to stormwater discharge and water quality would not occur. Thus, the proposed project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality.
Based on the above, the proposed project would not substantially degrade surface water quality or conflict with any applicable water quality control or management plans. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
b,e. The City of Roseville’s groundwater is derived from the North American Subbasin, which is part of the Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin. New impervious surfaces created by the project would be limited to a relatively small foundation necessary to support the proposed structures, and the project would not include any water use. Thus, the project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge within the North American Subbasin.
Based on the above, the proposed project would not substantially degrade groundwater quality or substantially interfere with groundwater recharge, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
ci-iii. The proposed project is not anticipated to create a substantial amount of new impervious surfaces on the project site. The proposed impervious surfaces would be limited to a concrete foundation supporting the proposed radio communications tower, associated shelter, emergency generator, and propane tank, as well as the access roadway.
Furthermore, only a small portion of the soil would be exposed during construction of the project and, thus, the project would not result in substantial erosion or siltation.
Consequently, the proposed project would not substantially increase stormwater runoff relative to existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-thansignificant impact related to soil erosion, surface runoff, and stormwater drainage. civ. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project site, the project site is located within an Area of Minimal Flood Hazard (Zone X). The site is not classified as a Special Flood Hazard Area or otherwise located within a 100-year or 500-year floodplain. Therefore, development of the proposed project would not impede or redirect flood flows and no impact would result. d. As discussed under question ‘civ’ above, the project site is not located within a flood hazard zone. Tsunamis are defined as sea waves created by undersea fault movement, whereas a seiche is a long-wavelength, large-scale wave action set up in a closed body of water such as a lake or reservoir. The project site is not located in proximity to a coastline and would not be potentially affected by flooding risks associated with tsunamis.
Seiches do not pose a risk to the proposed project, as the project site is not located adjacent to a large, closed body of water. Based on the above, the proposed project would not pose a risk related to the release of pollutants due to project inundation due to flooding, tsunami, or seiche, and no impact would occur.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-38
July 2022
3.2.10.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.
3.2.10.3 References
California Department of Water Resources. 2018. DWR Groundwater Basin Boundary Assessment Tool (BBAT). Available at: https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bbat/. Accessed April 2022.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2018. National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer. Map Number 06061C1032H. Available: https://www.fema.gov/floodmaps/national-flood-hazard-layer. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-39
July 2022
3.2.11 Land Use and Planning
XI. Land Use and Planning
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
3.2.11.1 Discussion
a. A project risks dividing an established community if the project would introduce infrastructure or alter land use so as to change the land use conditions in the surrounding community or isolate an existing land use. Existing land uses in the project vicinity include shopping centers with a variety of retail and commercial uses to the north, east, and southeast; undeveloped land to the south and southwest, across Strauch Drive; and shopping centers to the west and northwest, across Strauch Drive. In addition, the proposed radio communications tower would encompass a portion of a currently vacant parcel and, thus, would not isolate an existing land use. As such, the proposed project would not physically divide an established community and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
b. The project site is currently designated CC per the City of Roseville’s General Plan, and the site is zoned PD7. The proposed radio communications tower is an allowed use in the PD7 zoning designation, and would be subject to all requirements and standards pursuant to the PD7 district. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the type and intensity of uses anticipated for the site in the General Plan and generally analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Furthermore, as demonstrated throughout this IS/MND, the proposed project would not conflict with City policies and regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
Based on the above, the project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to conflicts with a land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
3.2.11.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to land use and planning. Therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-40
July 2022
3.2.11.3 References
City of Roseville. City of Roseville General Plan 2035. Adopted June 15, 2016. Amended August 17, 2016. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8774544.
Accessed May 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-41
July 2022
3.2.12 Mineral Resources
XII. Mineral Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
3.2.12.1 Discussion
a,b. Mineral extraction operations do not exist on or adjacent to the project site. Mineral resources are not evaluated in the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update EIR because the City does not designate any territory within the City for Resource extraction and the City does not overlie any known deposits of economically valuable mineral sources. Additionally, the City does not have a Surface Mining and Reclamation Act permit. Because the project site does not contain mineral resources and the construction of the proposed project would not result in the loss of any known mineral resources, no impact to mineral resources would occur.
3.2.12.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to mineral resources. Therefore, mitigation measures would not be required.
3.2.12.3 References
City of Roseville. 2035 General Plan Update EIR. August 5, 2020. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/development_services/planning /general_plan_development_guidelines. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville. City of Roseville General Plan 2035. Adopted June 15, 2016. Amended August 17, 2016. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8774544.
Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-42
July 2022
3.2.13 Noise
XIII. Noise
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project result in:
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in a local general plan
or noise ordinance or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
3.2.13.1 Discussion
a. The following sections present information regarding sensitive noise receptors in proximity to the project site, the existing noise environment, and the potential for the proposed project to result in impacts during project construction and operation. The following term is referenced in the sections below:
Decibel (dB): A unit of sound energy intensity. An A-weighted decibel (dBA) is a decibel corrected for the variation in frequency response to the typical human ear at commonly encountered noise levels. All references to dB in this section will be A-weighted unless noted otherwise.
Sensitive Noise Receptors
Some land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others, and, thus, are referred to as sensitive noise receptors. Land uses often associated with sensitive noise receptors generally include residences, schools, libraries, hospitals, and passive recreational areas. Noise sensitive land uses are typically given special attention in order to achieve protection from excessive noise. In the vicinity of the project site, the nearest existing sensitive receptor would be the single-family residences located west of the project site, approximately 400 feet away.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-43
July 2022
Existing Noise Environment
The ambient noise environment in the project vicinity is primarily characterized by vehicle traffic on roadways within the vicinity of the project site, including Douglas Boulevard, Rocky Ridge Drive, and Strauch Drive.
Standards of Significance
Policy N1.9 from the Roseville General Plan Noise Element states that constructionrelated noise that is consistent with the Roseville Noise Ordinance (RMC, Chapter 9.24, Noise Regulation) would be exempt from the noise standards outlined in the Noise Element. Noises resulting from construction activities are prohibited by the RMC, Chapter
9.24, Noise Regulation, during nighttime hours (7:00 PM to 7:00 AM, Monday through Friday, and 8:00 PM to 8:00 AM, Saturday, Sunday and, Holidays). The RMC also specifies that all construction equipment shall be fitted with factory installed muffling devices and that all construction equipment shall be maintained in good working order in order to prevent excessive noise.
Impact Analysis
During construction of the proposed project, heavy equipment would be used on-site, which would result in temporary noise level increases during the construction period.
Noise levels would vary depending on the type of equipment used, how the equipment is operated, and how well the equipment is maintained. Table 3.2.13-1 shows maximum noise levels associated with typical construction equipment.
Table 3.2.13-1. Construction Equipment Noise
Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dB at 50 feet
Backhoe 78
Compressor (air) 78
Excavator 81
Generator 81
Pneumatic Tools 85
Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, January 2006.
As demonstrated in the table, activities involved in typical construction would generate maximum noise levels up to 85 dB at a distance of 50 feet. Given that the nearest receptors are located approximately 400 feet from the project site, noise levels at the nearest receptors would be significantly reduced from the levels presented above.
Furthermore, temporary construction noises are exempt from the City’s noise standards.
Nonetheless, pursuant to RMC Chapter 9.24, Noise Regulation, construction would only occur during allowable hours, and all construction equipment would be fitted with muffling devices and maintained in good working order. Compliance with such restrictions would ensure that construction noise associated with the proposed project would be less than significant.
Radio communications towers are not known to emit perceivable noise or sound; thus, operation of the proposed project would not result in increased noise levels.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-44
July 2022
Conclusion
Based on the above, project construction noise would not conflict with the City’s General Plan if restricted to the hourly limits established by the City’s Noise Ordinance. In addition, the proposed project would not generate any noise level increases during operation.
Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a temporary exceedance of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. Similar to noise, vibration involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. However, noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface. As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s perception of the vibration depends on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating.
Vibration is measured in terms of acceleration velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration in terms of peak particle velocities (PPV) in inches per second (in/sec). Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration levels defined in terms of PPV. Human and structural response to different vibration levels is influenced by a number of factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events.
Table 3.2.13-2, which was developed by Caltrans, shows the vibration levels that would normally be required to result in damage to structures. As presented in the table, the threshold for architectural damage to structures is 0.20 in/sec PPV and continuous vibrations of 0.10 in/sec PPV, or greater, would likely cause annoyance to sensitive receptors.
The only vibration-generating activities associated with the proposed project would occur during construction activities. Table 3.2.13-3 shows the typical vibration levels produced by construction equipment at various distances. At a distance of 25 feet or greater, vibration levels from such equipment would be below the 0.20 in/sec threshold recommended by Caltrans.
The proposed construction activities would occur at a distance of over 400 feet from the single-family residences located to the west of the site. Therefore, per the vibration levels shown in Table 3.2.13-3, groundborne vibrations would be below the 0.20 in/sec PPV threshold established by Caltrans for architectural damage to buildings.
The proposed project would not involve any uses or operations that would generate substantial groundborne vibration.
Based on the above, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and a less-thansignificant impact would occur.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-45
July 2022
Table 3.2.13-2. Effects of Vibration on People and Buildings PPV
mm/sec in/sec Human Reaction Effect on Buildings
0.15 to
0.30 0.006 to
0.019
Threshold of perception;
possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause damage
of any type
2.0 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of the
vibration to which ruins and ancient
monuments should be subjected
2.5 0.10
Level at which continuous
vibrations begin to annoy
people
Virtually no risk of “architectural”
damage to normal buildings
5.0 0.20
Vibrations annoying to people
in buildings (this agrees with
the levels established for
people standing on bridges and
subjected to relative short
periods of vibrations)
Threshold at which there is a risk of
“architectural” damage to normal
dwelling - houses with plastered
walls and ceilings. Special types of
finish such as lining of walls, flexible
ceiling treatment, etc., would
minimize “architectural” damage
10 to 15 0.4 to 0.6
Vibrations considered
unpleasant by people subjected
to continuous vibrations and
unacceptable to some people
walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than
normally expected from traffic, but
would cause “architectural” damage
and possibly minor structural
damage
Source: Caltrans. Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. TAV-02-01-R9601.
February 20, 2002.
Table 3.2.13-3 Vibration Levels for Various Construction Equipment Type of Equipment PPV at 25 feet (in/sec) PPV at 50 feet (in/sec) Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.025
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.000
Auger/drill Rigs 0.089 0.029
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006.
c. The nearest airport to the project site is the Sacramento McClellan Airport, located approximately 8.5 miles southwest of the project site. Thus, the project site is not located within two miles of any public airports, and does not fall within an airport land use plan area. Therefore, no impact would occur related to the project being located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, thereby resulting in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.
3.2.13.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to noise. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-46
July 2022
3.2.13.3 References
City of Roseville. General Plan Noise Element. Available at:
https://p1cdn4static.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Governme nt/Departments/Development%20Services/Planning/General%20Plan/Final%20Gen eral%20Plan%202020/09%20Noise_Final.pdf. Accessed October 2021.
City of Roseville. Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 9.24 Noise Regulation. Available at:
https://qcode.us/codes/roseville/. Accessed October 2021.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-47
July 2022
3.2.14 Population and Housing
XIV. Population and Housing
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or
other infrastructure)?
b. Displace a substantial number of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
3.2.14.1 Discussion
a,b. The proposed project would include the construction of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, access roadway, emergency generator, and propane tank.
The project site is located in a developed area and would not include the extension of major infrastructure. Given the nature of the proposed project, the project would not create a large number of jobs or result in an influx of new residents to the project area. In addition, the proposed project would not include the construction of new housing or the demolition of existing residences. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial unplanned population growth or the displacement of existing people or housing, and no impact would occur.
3.2.14.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to population and housing. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.
3.2.14.3 References
None.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-48
July 2022
3.2.15 Public Services
XV. Public Services
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities or
a need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for any of the
following public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
3.2.15.1 Discussion
a. The Roseville Fire Department operates nine fire stations that provide fire protection, suppression, emergency medical services, and hazardous material management within the City of Roseville, including the project site. The closest station is located approximately
1.2 miles southeast of the project site (Fire Station No. 4). Although a propane tank would be present on the project site, as discussed in Section 3.2.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this document, such tanks are highly regulated and would not result in an increased demand for fire protection services. The Roseville Police Department, headquartered approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the project site at 1051 Junction Boulevard, provides police protection services throughout the City. Because the proposed project would not add any additional residents to the area, an increase in demand for fire and police services would not occur.
The project site is located within the Roseville City School District. Because the proposed project would not result in population growth in the area, implementation of the project would not generate additional demand for school facilities.
The nearest existing park to the project site is Maidu Regional Park, located approximately 3,000 feet south of the project site. Because the proposed project would not result in population growth in the area, additional demand for parks would not occur.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-49
July 2022
Based on the above, the proposed project would result in no impact relating to the provision of public services, including fire and police protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities.
3.2.15.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to the provision of public services. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.
3.2.15.3 References
City of Roseville. 2017. Location of Roseville Fire Stations. Roseville, California. Available at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Dep artments/Fire%20Dept/Fire%20Station%20Locations/Location%20of%20Roseville% 20Fire%20Stations%20-%202017.pdf. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-50
July 2022
3.2.16 Recreation
XVI. Recreation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b. Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational
facilities that might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
3.2.16.1 Discussion
a,b. The proposed project would include the development of a radio communications tower, as well as the associated shelter, emergency generator, propane tank, and access roadway, on a site that is currently designated for uses which are commercial in nature.
The proposed project would not result in any population growth that could result in increased use of existing recreational facilities, nor would the proposed project include or require construction or expansion of existing recreational facilities. Thus, no impact would occur.
3.2.16.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to recreational facilities. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.
3.2.16.3 References
None.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-51
July 2022
3.2.17 Transportation
XVII. Transportation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
3.2.17.1 Discussion
a-d. During construction, the proposed project would generate a minor amount of traffic on local roadways associated with construction worker commutes and the transport of materials for the project. However, such construction traffic would be limited, and would be temporary in nature. While the proposed project would include construction of a roadway extending east from the project site to the adjacent parking lot, the roadway would not be available for public use.
During the construction period, construction equipment and employee vehicles would access the project site by way of the new roadway. The new roadway and the existing parking area would be sufficient in length to accommodate the project-generated vehicles and equipment such that vehicles would not queue into the public roadway and disrupt the flow of traffic. In addition, vehicle speeds when passing through the adjacent parking lot to access the project site would be substantially slow to avoid any hazards to other vehicles and/or pedestrians.
Furthermore, the proposed project would not include development which would alter or increase demand for transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. While the proposed project would temporarily result in an increase in VMT during the construction period, operation and maintenance of the proposed project would not substantially affect local or regional VMT. Thus, impacts relating to VMT would be less than significant, and the project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities or with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). The project would include the development of a private City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-52
July 2022
access roadway connecting the project site to the adjacent parcel. The access roadway would be required to comply with all applicable roadway construction regulations, and access would be limited to maintenance personnel. Therefore, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses or result in inadequate emergency access.
Based on the above, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to transportation.
3.2.17.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to transportation. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.
3.2.17.3 References
None.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-53
July 2022
3.2.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American tribe, and
that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe.
3.2.18.1 Discussion
a,b. The project site is located in an urbanized area and is surrounded by existing development. Additionally, the project would not involve substantial ground disturbing activities. However, based on tribal consultation, the project site is considered a tribal cultural resource area.
A search of the NAHC’s Sacred Lands File was conducted, and did not indicate the presence of any known cultural resources on the project site. In compliance with AB 52 (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1), the City distributed project notification letters to the appropriate Tribes on June 3, 2022. One tribe, the United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC), requested consultation. The UAIC is a federally recognized Tribe comprised of both Miwok and Maidu (Nisenan) Tribal members who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. The Tribe has a deep spiritual, cultural, and physical ties to their ancestral land and are contemporary stewards of their culture and landscapes. The Tribal community represents a continuity and endurance of their ancestors by maintaining their connection to their history and culture. It is the Tribe’s goal to ensure the preservation and continuance of their cultural heritage for current and City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-54
July 2022
future generations. The UAIC has determined that tribal cultural resources are present on the project site and consultation was concluded with agreed upon mitigation measures on July 7, 2022.
Based on the above, the potential exists that previously unknown subsurface tribal cultural resources could be encountered on the project site. Should buried or otherwise unknown tribal cultural resources be encountered and/or damaged during construction, a potentially significant impact would occur. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR- 5 would reduce the potential impact to less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
3.2.18.2 Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Tribal Monitoring
The Construction Manager shall retain one tribal monitor to monitor all vegetation clearing and removal, and all initial surface grading of the project area, down to, for footings, 40 feet below the surface. Tribal monitoring is not required during above-surface construction activities, or when excavating or re-excavating imported fill. Tribal Monitoring is required for soil which has already been previously disturbed as part of the construction project.
The tribal monitor shall have the authority to temporarily pause ground disturbance within 100 feet of the discovery for a duration long enough to examine potential tribal cultural resources that may become unearthed during the activity. If tribal cultural resources or features are not identified, then construction activities shall proceed and agency notifications are not required. In the event that additional features of the Tribal Cultural Resource are identified, the unanticipated discovery procedures in Mitigation Measure TCR-2 shall be implemented.
The tribal monitor shall maintain daily monitoring logs, which shall be submitted to the City’s Project Manager no later than the conclusion of the monitoring as proof of compliance.
Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Anticipated and Unanticipated Discover Procedures If additional subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin, or tribal cultural resources, are discovered during construction, all work shall halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery, and the Construction Manager shall immediately notify the City of Roseville Development Services Director by phone. The Construction Manager shall also immediately coordinate with the tribal monitor, or, in the absence of either, contact a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology and subject to approval by the City, to evaluate the significance of the find and develop appropriate management recommendations. All management recommendations shall be provided to the City in writing for the City’s review City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-55
July 2022
and approval. If recommended by the qualified professional and approved by the City, this may include modification of the no-work radius.
The UAIC and Tribal Monitor shall make a determination, based on professional judgement and supported by substantial evidence, within one business day of being notified, as to whether or not the find represents a tribal cultural resource. The subsequent actions will be determined by the type of discovery, as described below. These include: 1) a work pause that, upon further investigation, is not actually a discovery and the work pause was simply needed in order to allow for closer examination of soil (a “false alarm”); 2) a work pause and subsequent action for discoveries that are clearly not related to tribal resources, such as can and bottle dumps, artifacts of European origin, and remnants of built environment features; and 3) a work pause and subsequent action for discoveries that are likely related to tribal resources, such as midden soil, bedrock mortars, groundstone, or other similar expressions.
Whenever there is question as to whether or not the discovery represents a tribal resource, culturally affiliated tribes shall be consulted in making the determination. Whenever a tribal monitor is present, the monitor shall be consulted.
The following processes shall apply, depending on the nature of the find, subject to the review and approval of the City:
Response to False Alarms: If the Tribal Monitor determines that the find is negative for any cultural indicators, then work may resume immediately upon notice to proceed from the City’s representative. No further notifications or tribal consultation is necessary, because the discovery is not a cultural resource of any kind. The Tribal Monitor or UAIC shall provide written documentation of this finding to the Project Manager this documentation may include the monitor logs or e-mail notification.
Response to Non-Tribal Discoveries: If a tribal monitor is not present at the time of discovery and the City shall be notified immediately, to consult on a finding of eligibility and implementation of appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. The City of Roseville will notify any [tribe(s)] who, in writing, requested notice of unanticipated discovery of non-tribal resources. Notice shall include the photograph and description of the find, and a tribal representative shall have the opportunity to determine whether or not the find represents a tribal cultural resource.
If a response is not received within 24 hours of notification (none of which time period may fall on weekends or City holidays), the City will deem this portion of the measure completed in good faith as long as the notification was made and documented. If requested by a [tribe(s)], the City may extend this timeframe, which shall be documented in writing (electronic communication may be used to satisfy this measure). If a notified tribe responds within 24 hours to indicate that the find represents a tribal cultural resource, then the Response to Tribal Discoveries portion of this measure applies. If the tribe does not respond or concurs that the discovery is non-tribal, work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the site either: 1) is not a Historical City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-56
July 2022
Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; or 2) that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.
Response to Tribal Discoveries: If the find represents a tribal or potentially tribal cultural resource that does not include human remains, the tribe and City shall be notified. The City will consult with the tribe on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be either a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, or a Tribal Cultural Resource, as defined in Section 21074 of the Public Resources Code.
Preservation in place is the preferred treatment, if feasible. Work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the site either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; or 2) not a Tribal Cultural Resource, as defined in Section 21074 of the Public Resources Code; or 3) that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.
Response to Human Remains: If the find includes human remains, or remains that are potentially human, the construction supervisor or on-site archaeologist shall ensure reasonable protection measures are taken to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641) and shall notify the City and Placer County Coroner (per § 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, § 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, and Assembly Bill 2641 shall be implemented. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which then will designate a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains. Public Resources Code § 5097.94 provides structure for mediation through the NAHC if necessary. If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (§ 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code).
If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains in a respectful manner where they will not be further disturbed (§ 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a reinternment document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). Work shall not resume within the no-work radius until the City, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.
Mitigation Measure TCR-3: Restoration Location Designation Following the completion of ground disturbance soil will be retained on site, and at a mutually agreed upon time, a location shall be selected for reburial and/or placement of soil to restore all cultural items or cultural soils to the TCR. The location selected shall be under the control of the property owner, in an area not planned for future disturbance, and can accommodate the recording of a deed restriction, should the reburial location be utilized for the project. A copy of a map showing the reburial location shall be filed with the City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-57
July 2022
City for proof of compliance prior to construction and shall remain confidential. A deed restriction over the reburial location need not be filed with the County until materials have been reburied at the selected location. If the reburial location is not utilized for the project, then no further documentation or deed restrictions are required.
In the event that human remains or tribal cultural resources are encountered, the consultation and evaluation process in Mitigation Measure TCR-2 for the management of unanticipated discoveries shall be followed. Upon conclusion of that process, the Construction Manager shall rebury specified materials in the location selected for reburial, at the City’s direction and discretion. The City shall reserve the right to dictate the nature, methods, and timing of the reburial.
Within 30 days of the reburial, and consistent with Section 5097.98(e) of the Public Resources Code, the location of the reburial shall be further recorded by a qualified professional on a DPR 523 Series Primary Record and Location Map and submitted to the North Central Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information Center [5097.98(e)(1)], Native American Heritage Commission, and a reinternment record filed with the County [5097.98(e)(3)]. A copy of the confidential record and transmittal to each repository shall be provided to the City as proof of compliance within 30 days of recording.
Mitigation Measure TCR-4: Install Protective Fencing During Construction The construction contractor(s), UAIC Representative, and Tribal Monitor will install protective fencing or other acceptable methods around the culturally modified boulders, including a buffer area, before construction starts or restarts. Standard buffer areas are 100 feet, but may be increased or decreased if both the CEQA lead agency representative and affiliated Native American Tribes agree. The construction contractor(s) will maintain the protection throughout construction to avoid the resource/area of sensitivity during all remaining phases of construction. The area will be demarcated as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area”.
Mitigation Measure TCR-5: Contribution for Reburial Costs To fund costs of mitigation to the TCR, a financial contribution, will be made to the Roseville Maidu Museum for Tribal reburial costs. The contribution will be based on impacts documented during tribal monitoring, up to a maximum of $15,000.
3.2.18.3 References
Native American Heritage Commission. Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project. April 19, 2022.
North Central Information Center. Records Search Results for Strauch Drive Radio Communications Tower Project; NCIC File No.: PLA-22-35. April 7, 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-58
July 2022
3.2.19 Utilities and Service Systems
XIX. Utilities and Service Systems
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of state or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste reduction
goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
3.2.19.1 Discussion
a-e. Electricity for the proposed project would be provided by a new connection to an existing transformer. Water, wastewater, storm drainage infrastructure would not be impacted by the proposed project, as the project would not require connections to such utility features.
While construction of the proposed project could generate a small amount of solid waste, the waste could be accommodated by the existing landfill facilities serving the City.
Operation of the proposed project would not require solid waste or landfill services.
Overall, the proposed project would not require the relocation or construction of new or expanded utilities.
Given that the proposed project is consistent with the site’s current General Plan land use and zoning designations, the utility infrastructure within the project vicinity has been designed with adequate capacity to accommodate the minor increase in electricity City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-59
July 2022
demand from development of the proposed radio communications tower, as well as other existing and planned uses in the project area. Therefore, the project would result in a lessthan-significant impact related to utilities and service systems.
3.2.19.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to utilities and service systems. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.
3.2.19.3 References
None.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-60
July 2022
3.2.20 Wildfire
XX. Wildfire
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones, would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks of, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines, or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts on the
environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
3.2.20.1 Discussion
a-d. According to the CAL FIRE Fire and Resource Assessment Program, the project site is not located within or near a State Responsibility Area or lands classified as a VHFHSZ.
The nearest VHFHSZ is approximately 10 miles east of the project site. The project site is located in a Local Responsibility Area where the Roseville Fire Department is responsible for fire protection services. Because the proposed project consists only of the installation of a radio communications tower and does not involve adding new residents or changing circulation patterns, the proposed project would not impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Additionally, the topography of the project site is relatively flat, and the site is located in an urbanized area of the City; thus, the project site is not susceptible to downstream flooding or landslide. Therefore, the proposed project would not be subject to substantial risks related to wildfires, and a lessthan-significant impact would occur.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-61
July 2022
3.2.20.2 Mitigation Measures
The proposed project would not result in any potentially significant impacts related to wildfire. Therefore, mitigation would not be required.
3.2.20.3 References
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer.
Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed April 2022.
City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-62
July 2022
3.2.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-thanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c. Does the project have environmental effects
that will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
3.2.21.1 Discussion
a. As discussed in Section 3.2.4, Biological Resources, of this IS/MND, the project site is subject to regular discing and is, therefore, regularly disturbed, and construction of the proposed project would not further degrade the quality of the environment, cause fish or wildlife populations to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Due to previous disturbance of the site, the site does not contain any known historic or prehistoric resources. However, the possibility remains that tree removal could affect protected nesting bird species. Additionally, previously unknown cultural resources or tribal cultural resources could be encountered during ground disturbing activities.
Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, CUL-1, CUL-2, and TCR-1 through TCR-5 would ensure that the proposed project would not displace protected species or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, potential impacts would be less-than-significant with mitigation incorporated. b. The proposed project, in conjunction with other development within the City of Roseville, could incrementally contribute to cumulative impacts in the area. However, as City of Roseville Environmental Checklist
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
East Site Radio Communication Tower: Emergency
and Daily Operational Services Project
3-63
July 2022
demonstrated in this IS/MND, all potential environmental impacts that could occur as a result of implementation of the proposed project would result in no impact or a less-thansignificant impact through applicable General Plan policies and RMC Standards, as well as other local and State policies. In addition, the proposed project would be allowable under the project site’s current land use and zoning designations. Therefore, development of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to cumulative impacts to cumulative impacts in the City of Roseville, and the proposed project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts would be less than significant. c. As described in this IS/MND, the proposed project would comply with all applicable General Plan policies, RMC Standards, and other applicable local and State regulations.
In addition, as discussed in Section 3.2.3, Air Quality, Section 3.2.7, Geology and Soils, Section 3.2.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Section 3.2.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Section 3.2.13, Noise, and Section 3.2.17, Transportation, of this IS/MND, the proposed project would not cause substantial effects to human beings, including effects related to exposure to air pollutants, hazardous materials, noise, and traffic. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact.
ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC Strauch Drive City of Roseville Communications Installation PLAN FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AA • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • A A BB
ORDINANCE NO. 6856
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Citywide East Site Radio Communications project.
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
4105 6587 84001 400126 825,502 Increase Budget to cover additional costs 1030 6587 84001 400126 462,092 Increase Budget to cover additional costs EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 1,287,594
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 1,287,594
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
4105 3601 00000 000000 (825,502) Decrease IT Replacement Fund Balance 1030 3601 00000 000000 (462,092) Decrease Strategic Improvement Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (1,287,594)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
This budget adjustment is needed to increase 400126 - East Radio Site Relocation project budget.
The project scope consists of site construction, tower, shelter, generator, propane tank, grounding, tree removal, bird survey, United Auburn Indian Council observation, City staff labor, fiber connectivity, power, cameras, lights, network equipment, spectrum analyzer, antenna systems, microwave dish link to the PD site, new radio equipment, system simulcast alignment, decommissioning of the old East radio site and a 15% contingency to ensure successful site construction and optimization.
The revised project budget will be $2,965,306 which is funded by: Fund 1030 - Strategic Improvement Funds - $1,497,000; 3355 - Public Facilities - $402,401 and 4105 - Information Technology Replacement - $1,065.905.
Adequate funds are available in the IT Replacement and Strategic Improvement Funds to cover this increase.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Karl Grover - IT Program Manager FISCAL YEAR: 2024-25 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Austin Murray - IT Management Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 08/21/24 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Information Technology / Network Solutions ORDINANCE:
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3503
File #: 0601-01
Title: Staffing Changes
Contact: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/21/2024
Item #: 7.21.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing structure to provide a high level of service to the community, staff recommends the following changes to the City’s staffing allocation and salary schedules to meet business needs. It is recommended that City Council take the following actions:
1. Adopt an ordinance to approve the Temporary salary schedule (Appendix V) reflecting the reclassification of Aqua Fitness Instructor I/II (3745/3747) to Aqua Fitness Instructor (3747) effective August 24, 2024; and
2. Adopt an ordinance to approve the Management A & B salary schedules (Appendix E) reflecting the reclassification of Utility Billing Operations Manager (0920A/0920B) to Customer Care Manager (1150A/1150B) and Electric Customer Programs Supervisor (6285A/6285B) to Electric Customer Programs and Public Affairs Supervisor (1151A/1151B) classifications effective August 24, 2024; and
3. Motion to approve the attached city-wide allocation schedule effective August 24, 2024.
BACKGROUND
As part of the Municipal Code, the Human Resources Department maintains the City’s classification plan. Human Resources staff continually evaluate organizational structure and staffing levels necessary to provide high service levels to the community. The recommended changes include the reclassification of one (1) temporary classification and two (2) management classifications reflected on the temporary and management salary schedules. The allocation schedule updates include the addition of one (1) full-time regular position, the reclassification of three (3) full-time regular positions and the deletion of one (1) full-time regular position, which are summarized and explained below:
Reclassification
Delete Add
Salary
Range Min.
– Max.
Department
Bargaining
Unit
Aqua Fitness
Instructor I/II
(3745/3747)
Aqua Fitness
Instructor (3747)
$51.0000
(hourly)
Parks,
Recreation, &
Libraries Temporary
Engineering
Technician I/II
(1350A/1350B)
Senior Engineering
Technician
(7162A/7162B)
$5,649.31 -
$7,949.19
Environmental
Utilities Local 39
Utility Billing
Operations
Manager
(0920A/0920B)
Customer Care
Manager
(1150A/1150B)
$9,442.20 to
$12,653.45
Electric Management
Electric Customer
Programs
Supervisor
(6285A/6285B)
Electric Customer
Programs and Public
Affairs Supervisor
(1151A/1151B)
$11,844.77 -
$15,873.14
Electric Management
Add
Position Position Number Department
Assistant/Associate Electric Analyst ELE701067010 Electric Delete
Position Position Number Department
Meter Reader ELE704540003 Electric
Changes by Department:
Electric
After recent classification studies, staff recommends the reclassification of the Utility Billing Operations Manager to a new Customer Care Manager classification with the salary set fifteen percent (15%) above the Utility Billing and Field Services Supervisor. The reclassification and salary reduction will more accurately reflect the change in job duties due to the utility billing system technology work being moved under a different manager. Staff also recommends the Electric Customer Programs Supervisor be reclassified to Electric Customer Programs and Public Affairs Supervisor, to reflect the added duties of managing the public affairs team and customer outreach in the Electric Department. Staff recommends the same salary range, as there remains a 15 percent differential above the highest paid subordinate class.
Staff recommends adding one (1) regular Assistant/Associate Electric Analyst and deleting one (1) full-time, vacant, regular Meter Reader position. This newAssistant/Association Electric Analyst position will be split between the Customer Care divisions for Electric and Environmental Utilities. This position will support the Advanced Metering Infrastructure and provide analytical support, ensuring data quality, and foster continuous improvements.
Environmental Utilities
After a review of the assigned job duties, the classification consultant recommended that the Engineering Technician position be reclassified to the Senior Engineering Technician to reflect the complexity and broader array of job duties assigned to the position.
Parks, Recreation, and Libraries (PR&L)
Staff recommends eliminating the levels classification for the Aqua Fitness Instructor I/II and having a single temporary classification titled Aqua Fitness Instructor. PR&L has had increasing difficulty recruiting and retaining employees at the level I. The industry standards are at a single level classification with the compensation being at the level II.
This request does not result in any additional costs as the classification hourly rate will be funded within the PR&L approved FY24-25 temporary salaries budget.
FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated total cost of the recommended position adjustments will be $41,999 for the remainder of FY2024-25, all of which can be absorbed into existing appropriations, so no budget adjustment is required at this time.
Beyond this fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $51,999.
The following table provides a summary of costs by fund and department:
Department Fund
Remainder
of FY2024-
25 Ongoing
Electric Electric Fund - 50%
Water Operations Fund - 50%
$31,138 $74,559
Environmental Utilities Water Operations Fund - 45%
Wastewater Operations – 45%
Waste Services – 10%
$10,861 $13,447
Total $41,999 $51,999
The following charts summarize the costs of the recommended position adjustments by department:
Electric
From To Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact for
remaining
FY 2024-
25 Meter Reader Assistant/Associate
Electric Analyst
$102,327 $176,885 $74,559 $60,220
Utility Billing
Operations
Manager
Customer Care
Manager
$271,461 $235,454 -$36,007 -$29,082
Electric
Customer
Programs
Supervisor
Electric Customer
Programs and
Public Affairs
Supervisor
$295,366 $295,366 $0 $0
Total $38,552 $31,138
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $2,696.73.
The cost for the remainder of FY2024-25 can be absorbed by existing appropriations.
Environmental Utilities
From To Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact for
remaining
FY 2024-
25 Engineering
Technician
Senior
Engineering
Technician
$134,471 $147,918 $13,447 $10,861
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $941.
This position reclassification was approved to be reviewed during the FY 2024-25 budget development process and the funds were included in the budget.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed staffing changes meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Macy Dippert, Human Resources Manager
Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Ordinance 6854
2024-08-24 Temporary Salary Schedule
Ordinance 6855
Management ScheduleA 8-24-2024
Management Schedule B 8-24-2024
2024-08-24 PositionAllocation Schedule
ORDINANCE NO. 6854
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6840, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR SEASONAL/TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “V” TO BE EFFECTIVE
AUGUST 24, 2024, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Title and Purpose.
Ordinance No. 6840, the Salary Ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, is hereby amended as shown on Appendix “V” attached hereto.
AMENDMENT OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Hourly Rate
3747 Aqua Fitness Instructor $51.00
SECTION 2. Salary Plan Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall be effective August 24, 2024, as an urgency measure.
SECTION 3. Urgency Ordinance.
This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect August 24, 2024. A statement of urgency is as follows:
It is necessary to amend the Salary Ordinance to comply with recently approved changes for the orderly and necessary continuance of operations of the City.
SECTION 4. Posting.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST: MAYOR
City Clerk
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:V
Salary Schedule: Temporary-- Effective Date:08/24/2024
Grade Code Step Name Hourly
CI30 Step A 0.0000
3747 Step A 51.0000
1100
Grade Name
Activity Instructor
Aqua Fitness Instructor
Aquatics Facilities Maintenance
Worker
Step A 18.5000
Step B 18.9569
Step C 19.4250
Step D 19.9047
Step E 20.3963
Step F 20.8999
Step G 21.4161
Step H 21.9449
Step I 22.4869
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9503 Assistant Pool Manager I Step A 20.2584
1077 Assistant Pool Manager II Step A 21.2714
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9505 Building Inspection Assistant Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3951
Step C 16.8000
Step D 17.2149
Step E 17.6400
Step F 18.0756
Step G 18.5220
Step H 18.9794
Step I 19.4481
9507 Child Care Aide Step A 16.5375
Step B 16.9459
Step C 17.3644
Step D 17.7932
Step E 18.2326
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9506 Child Care Program Assistant Step A 19.9436
Step B 20.4361
Step C 20.9408
Step D 21.4579
Step E 21.9879
1010 Child Care Program Leader Step A 23.9324
Step B 24.5234
Step C 25.1290
Step D 25.7496
Step E 26.3855
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9508 Child Care Teacher Step A 17.3644
Step B 17.7932
Step C 18.2326
Step D 18.6829
Step E 19.1442
CI10 Class Instructor Step A 0.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1230 College Intern Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.8000
Step C 17.6400
Step D 18.5220
Step E 19.4481
Step F 20.4205
Step G 21.4415
Step H 22.5136
Step I 23.6393
Step J 24.8213
Step K 26.0623
Step L 27.3654
Step M 28.7337
Step N 30.1704
Step O 31.6789
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1127 Community Outreach Specialist Step A 33.8978
Step B 34.7349
Step C 35.5926
Step D 36.4716
Step E 37.3723
Step F 38.2952
Step G 39.2409
Step H 40.2100
Step I 41.2029
1270 Council Member Step A
*Mayor receives an additional $50.00 per month
600.0000 monthly stipend*
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1137 Customer Service Specialist Step A 17.5000
Step B 18.0250
Step C 18.5658
Step D 19.1227
Step E 19.6964
Step F 20.2873
Step G 20.8959
Step H 21.5228
Step I 22.1685
9509 Engineering Aide Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3951
Step C 16.8000
Step D 17.2149
Step E 17.6400
Step F 18.0756
Step G 18.5220
Step H 18.9794
Step I 19.4481
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1020 Event Recreation Program Leader Step A 22.5000
1014 Event Specialist I Step A 19.0000
1015 Event Specialist II Step A 20.0000
1016 Event Specialist III Step A 21.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9510 Fire Equipment Specialist Step A 16.5421
Step B 16.8851
Step C 17.3072
Step D 17.7399
Step E 18.1834
Step F 18.6380
Step G 19.1039
Step H 19.5815
Step I 20.0711
Step J 20.5729
Step K 21.0872
Step L 21.6144
Step M 22.1547
Step N 22.7086
Step O 23.2763
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9511 Fire Logistics Worker Step A 16.5421
Step B 16.8851
Step C 17.3072
Step D 17.7399
Step E 18.1834
Step F 18.6380
Step G 19.1039
Step H 19.5815
Step I 20.0711
Step J 20.5729
Step K 21.0872
Step L 21.6144
Step M 22.1547
Step N 22.7086
Step O 23.2763
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9512 Fire Public Education Coordinator Step A 20.5700
Step B 21.3636
Step C 21.8977
Step D 22.4452
Step E 23.0063
Step F 23.5815
Step G 24.1710
Step H 24.7753
Step I 25.3946
Step J 26.0295
Step K 26.6802
Step L 27.3473
Step M 28.0309
Step N 28.7317
Step O 29.4500
CI20 Fitness Instructor-Fee Step A 0.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
3735 Fitness Instructor-Hourly Step A 30.0000
Step B 31.0000
Step C 32.0000
Step D 33.0000
Step E 34.0000
Step F 35.0000
1145 High School Intern Step A 18.0000
1079 Instructor Hourly Step A 23.0000
Step B 24.0000
Step C 25.0000
Step D 26.0000
Step E 27.0000
Step F 28.0000
Step G 29.0000
Step H 30.0000
Step I 31.0000
3750 Instructor Meeting Rate Step A 19.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9513 Interpretive Services Program
Assistant
Step A 17.0000
Step B 18.0000
Step C 19.0000
Step D 20.0000
9514 Interpretive Services Program Leader Step A 19.5000
20.5000
21.5000
22.5000
Step B
Step C
Step D
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9515 Library Page Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3951
Step C 16.8000
Step D 17.2149
Step E 17.6400
Step F 18.0756
Step G 18.5220
Step H 18.9794
Step I 19.4481
1074 Lifeguard Step A 17.5000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9518 Maintenance Assistant Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3951
Step C 16.8000
Step D 17.2149
Step E 17.6400
Step F 18.0756
Step G 18.5220
Step H 18.9794
Step I 19.4481
Step J 19.9284
Step K 20.4205
Step L 20.9248
Step M 21.4415
Step N 21.9710
Step O 22.5136
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9519 Marketing Technician Step A 20.8116
Step B 21.3255
Step C 21.8522
Step D 22.3918
Step E 22.9448
Step F 23.5114
Step G 24.0920
Step H 24.6870
Step I 25.2966
Step J 25.9213
Step K 26.5615
Step L 27.2174
Step M 27.8895
Step N 28.5783
Step O 29.2840
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9521 Parks and Facility Maintenance
Worker
Step A 18.5000
Step B 18.9569
Step C 19.4250
Step D 19.9047
Step E 20.3963
Step F 20.8999
Step G 21.4161
Step H 21.9449
Step I 22.4869
1011 Parks and Facility Maintenance
Worker-Commercial Driver
Step A 19.4250
Step B 19.9047
Step C 20.3963
Step D 20.8999
Step E 21.4161
Step F 21.9449
Step G 22.4869
Step H 23.0422
Step I 23.6112
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9523 Parks and Open Space Equipment
Operator
Step A 24.2700
Step B 24.8694
Step C 25.4835
Step D 26.1128
Step E 26.7577
Step F 27.4185
Step G 28.0956
Step H 28.7894
Step I 29.5003
1012 Parks and Open Space Equipment
Operator-Commerical Driver
Step A 25.4835
Step B 26.1128
Step C 26.7577
Step D 27.4185
Step E 28.0956
Step F 28.7894
Step G 29.5003
Step H 30.2289
Step I 30.9754
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
3749 Personal Trainer I Step A 37.0000
1070 Personal Trainer II Step A 40.0000
1071 Personal Trainer III Step A 45.0000
1072 Personal Trainer IV Step A 50.0000
9525 Police Cadet Step A 23.4058
Step B 24.5062
Step C 25.2414
Step D 25.9986
Step E 26.7787
Step F 27.5820
Step G 28.4094
Step H 29.2617
Step I 30.1396
Step J 31.0438
Step K 31.9751
Step L 32.9343
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9527 Pool Manager I Step A 22.3349
1078 Pool Manager II Step A 23.4517
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9528 Preschool Teacher Step A 20.9408
Step B 21.4579
Step C 21.9879
Step D 22.5308
Step E 23.0872
6110 Recreation Aide Step A 13.6000
Step B 16.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9532 Recreation Program Leader Step A 19.5000
Step B 20.5000
Step C 21.5000
Step D 22.5000
9533 Recreation Specialist I Step A 16.0000
Step B 17.0000
Step C 18.0000
Step D 19.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9534 Recreation Specialist II Step A 17.0000
Step B 18.0000
Step C 19.0000
Step D 20.0000
9535 Recreation Specialist III Step A 18.0000
Step B 19.0000
Step C 20.0000
Step D 21.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
6252 Reserve Police Officer I Step A 40.9115
Step B 42.1737
Step C 43.4748
Step D 44.8159
Step E 46.2000
Step F 47.6239
Step G 49.0931
Step H 50.6077
Step I 52.1691
6250 Reserve Police Officer II (Unpaid) Step A 0.0000
6248 Reserve Police Officer III (Unpaid) Step A 0.0000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9536 School Crossing Guard Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3951
Step C 16.8000
Step D 17.2149
Step E 17.6400
Step F 18.0756
Step G 18.5220
Step H 18.9794
Step I 19.4481
9538 Senior Child Care Teacher Step A 18.2326
Step B 18.6828
Step C 19.1442
Step D 19.6170
Step E 20.1014
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1075 Senior Lifeguard I Step A 18.3750
1076 Senior Lifeguard II Step A 19.2938
9537 Senior School Crossing Guard Step A 17.6000
Step B 18.0346
Step C 18.4800
Step D 18.9364
Step E 19.4040
Step F 19.8832
Step G 20.3742
Step H 20.8773
Step I 21.3929
7005 Soccer Official Step A 65.0000
7207 Sports Official/Scorer I Step A 18.0000
7208 Sports Official/Scorer II Step A 20.0000
9552 Swim Instructor Aide Step A 17.5000
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9553 Swim Instructor I Step A 18.5000
9554 Swim Instructor II Step A 19.5000
1149 Therapeutic Recreation Program
Leader
Step A 26.0000
Step B 26.6421
Step C 27.3000
Step D 27.9742
Step E 28.6650
Step F 29.3729
Step G 30.0983
Step H 30.8416
Step I 31.6032
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9539 Video Technician Step A 22.5676
Step B 23.1250
Step C 23.6962
Step D 24.2815
Step E 24.8813
Step F 25.4958
Step G 26.1256
Step H 26.7709
Step I 27.4321
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
8941 Vocational Intern Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.8000
Step C 17.6400
Step D 18.5220
Step E 19.4481
Step F 20.4205
Step G 21.4415
Step H 22.5136
Step I 23.6393
Step J 24.8213
Step K 26.0623
Step L 27.3654
Step M 28.7337
Step N 30.1704
Step O 31.6789
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9540 Water Conservation Helper Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3952
Step C 16.8002
Step D 17.2151
Step E 17.6403
Step F 18.0761
Step G 18.5225
Step H 18.9800
Step I 19.4488
Appendix:V
Effective Date:08/24/2024
ORDINANCE NO. 6855
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6842, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “E” TO BE EFFECTIVE
AUGUST 24, 2024, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Title and Purpose.
Ordinance No. 6842, the Salary Ordinance for Management Employees, is hereby amended as shown on Appendix “E” for salary schedules A & B attached hereto.
AMENDMENT OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Hourly Rate
1150A/1150B Customer Care Manager $73.00
1151A/1151B Electric Customer Programs and
Public Affairs Supervisor $91.57
SECTION 2. Salary Plan Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall be effective August 24, 2024 as an urgency measure.
SECTION 3. Urgency Ordinance.
This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect August 24, 2024. A statement of urgency is as follows:
It is necessary to amend the Salary Ordinance to comply with recently approved changes for the orderly and necessary continuance of operations of the City.
SECTION 4. Posting.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2 MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1505A AMI Project Manager-A Step A 54.7228 4377.82 9485.29 113823.42 Step B 57.4590 4596.72 9959.56 119514.72
Step C 60.3319 4826.55 10457.53 125490.35
Step D 63.3486 5067.89 10980.42 131765.09
Step E 66.5159 5321.27 11529.42 138353.07
Step F 69.8416 5587.33 12105.88 145270.53
Step G 73.3338 5866.70 12711.19 152534.30
1370A Accounting Manager-A Step A 62.8047 5024.38 10886.15 130633.78 Step B 65.9450 5275.60 11430.47 137165.60
Step C 69.2423 5539.38 12002.00 144023.98
Step D 72.7043 5816.34 12602.08 151224.94
Step E 76.3395 6107.16 13232.18 158786.16
Step F 80.1566 6412.53 13893.81 166725.73
Step G 84.1643 6733.14 14588.48 175061.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0043A Accounting Supervisor-A Step A 52.1047 4168.38 9031.48 108377.78 Step B 54.7100 4376.80 9483.07 113796.80
Step C 57.4455 4595.64 9957.22 119486.64
Step D 60.3179 4825.43 10455.10 125461.23
Step E 63.3337 5066.70 10977.84 131734.10
Step F 66.5004 5320.03 11526.74 138320.83
Step G 69.8254 5586.03 12103.07 145236.83
9427A Accounts Payable Supervisor-A Step A 49.6233 3969.86 8601.37 103216.46 Step B 52.1044 4168.35 9031.43 108377.15
Step C 54.7096 4376.77 9483.00 113795.97
Step D 57.4450 4595.60 9957.13 119485.60
Step E 60.3173 4825.38 10455.00 125459.98
Step F 63.3332 5066.66 10977.75 131733.06
Step G 66.4999 5319.99 11526.65 138319.79
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0090A Alternative Transportation Manager-A Step A 63.7302 5098.42 11046.57 132558.82 Step B 66.9167 5353.34 11598.89 139186.74
Step C 70.2625 5621.00 12178.83 146146.00
Step D 73.7757 5902.06 12787.79 153453.46
Step E 77.4645 6197.16 13427.18 161126.16
Step F 81.3377 6507.02 14098.53 169182.42
Step G 85.4044 6832.35 14803.43 177641.15
1017A Assistant Building Official-A Step A 48.1569 3852.55 8347.20 100166.35 Step B 50.5648 4045.18 8764.57 105174.78
Step C 53.0930 4247.44 9202.79 110433.44
Step D 55.7476 4459.81 9662.92 115955.01
Step E 58.5352 4682.82 10146.10 121753.22
Step F 61.4620 4916.96 10653.41 127840.96
Step G 64.5349 5162.79 11186.05 134232.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0245A Assistant City Attorney-A Step A 94.0641 7525.13 16304.44 195653.33 Step B 98.7673 7901.38 17119.67 205435.98
Step C 103.7056 8296.45 17975.64 215707.65
Step D 108.8909 8711.27 18874.42 226493.07
Step E 114.3354 9146.83 19818.14 237817.63
Step F 120.0523 9604.18 20809.07 249708.78
Step G 126.0548 10084.38 21849.50 262193.98
0250A Assistant City Clerk-A Step A 48.0029 3840.23 8320.50 99846.03 Step B 50.4032 4032.26 8736.55 104838.66
Step C 52.9234 4233.87 9173.39 110080.67
Step D 55.5696 4445.57 9632.06 115584.77
Step E 58.3481 4667.85 10113.67 121364.05
Step F 61.2654 4901.23 10619.34 127432.03
Step G 64.3287 5146.30 11150.31 133803.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0325A Assistant City Manager-A Step A 94.9999 7599.99 16466.65 197599.79 Step B 99.7498 7979.98 17289.97 207479.58
Step C 104.7374 8378.99 18154.48 217853.79
Step D 109.9743 8797.94 19062.21 228746.54
Step E 115.4730 9237.84 20015.32 240183.84
Step F 121.2466 9699.73 21016.08 252192.93
Step G 127.3089 10184.71 22066.88 264802.51
1021A Assistant City Manager/Chief
Financial Officer-A
Step A 94.9999 7599.99 16466.65 197599.79
Step B 99.7498 7979.98 17289.97 207479.58
Step C 104.7374 8378.99 18154.48 217853.79
Step D 109.9743 8797.94 19062.21 228746.54
Step E 115.4730 9237.84 20015.32 240183.84
Step F 121.2466 9699.73 21016.08 252192.93
Step G 127.3089 10184.71 22066.88 264802.51
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1068A Assistant Electric Analyst-A Step A 37.2034 2976.27 6448.59 77383.07 Step B 39.0636 3125.09 6771.02 81252.29
Step C 41.0167 3281.34 7109.56 85314.74
Step D 43.0676 3445.41 7465.05 89580.61
Step E 45.2210 3617.68 7838.31 94059.68
Step F 47.4821 3798.57 8230.23 98762.77
Step G 49.8562 3988.50 8641.74 103700.90
0395A Assistant Electric Utility Director-A Step A 112.4490 8995.92 19491.16 233893.92 Step B 118.0716 9445.73 20465.74 245588.93
Step C 123.9753 9918.02 21489.05 257868.62
Step D 130.1739 10413.91 22563.48 270761.71
Step E 136.6827 10934.62 23691.67 284300.02
Step F 143.5168 11481.34 24876.25 298514.94
Step G 150.6927 12055.42 26120.07 313440.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0411A Assistant Environmental Utilities
Director-A
Step A 76.8725 6149.80 13324.57 159894.80
Step B 80.7161 6457.29 13990.79 167889.49
Step C 84.7521 6780.17 14690.36 176284.37
Step D 88.9894 7119.15 15424.83 185097.95
Step E 93.4390 7475.12 16196.09 194353.12
Step F 98.1110 7848.88 17005.91 204070.88
Step G 103.0165 8241.32 17856.19 214274.32
1026A Assistant Finance Director-A Step A 72.2245 5777.96 12518.91 150226.96 Step B 75.8356 6066.85 13144.84 157738.05
Step C 79.6275 6370.20 13802.10 165625.20
Step D 83.6089 6688.71 14492.21 173906.51
Step E 87.7894 7023.15 15216.83 182601.95
Step F 92.1789 7374.31 15977.68 191732.11
Step G 96.7878 7743.02 16776.55 201318.62
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0480A Assistant Fire Chief-A Step A 74.4805 5958.44 12909.95 154919.44 Step B 78.2044 6256.35 13555.43 162665.15
Step C 82.1150 6569.20 14233.27 170799.20
Step D 86.2206 6897.65 14944.90 179338.85
Step E 90.5317 7242.54 15692.16 188305.94
Step F 95.0582 7604.66 16476.75 197721.06
Step G 99.8113 7984.90 17300.63 207607.50
0484A Assistant Human Resources DirectorA Step A 65.1431 5211.45 11291.47 135497.65 Step B 68.3997 5471.98 11855.95 142271.38
Step C 71.8203 5745.62 12448.85 149386.22
Step D 75.4113 6032.90 13071.29 156855.50
Step E 79.1820 6334.56 13724.88 164698.56
Step F 83.1410 6651.28 14411.11 172933.28
Step G 87.2980 6983.84 15131.65 181579.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9558A Assistant Information Technology
Director-A
Step A 68.4017 5472.14 11856.29 142275.54
Step B 71.8220 5745.76 12449.15 149389.76
Step C 75.4130 6033.04 13071.59 156859.04
Step D 79.1835 6334.68 13725.14 164701.68
Step E 83.1430 6651.44 14411.45 172937.44
Step F 87.2999 6983.99 15131.98 181583.79
Step G 91.6649 7333.19 15888.58 190662.99
0510A Assistant Police Chief-A Step A 86.6885 6935.08 15026.01 180312.08 Step B 91.0227 7281.82 15777.27 189327.22
Step C 95.5741 7645.93 16566.18 198794.13
Step D 100.3527 8028.22 17394.47 208733.62
Step E 105.3704 8429.63 18264.20 219170.43
Step F 110.6389 8851.11 19177.41 230128.91
Step G 116.1709 9293.67 20136.29 241635.47
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1148A Assistant Public Works Director-A Step A 71.2520 5700.16 12350.35 148204.16 Step B 74.8146 5985.17 12967.86 155614.37
Step C 78.5554 6284.43 13616.27 163395.23
Step D 82.4831 6598.65 14297.07 171564.85
Step E 86.6073 6928.58 15011.93 180143.18
Step F 90.9376 7275.01 15762.52 189150.21
Step G 95.4845 7638.76 16550.65 198607.76
0086A Assistant Transportation Planner-A Step A 37.9473 3035.78 6577.53 78930.38 Step B 39.8449 3187.59 6906.45 82877.39
Step C 41.8370 3346.96 7251.75 87020.96
Step D 43.9289 3514.31 7614.34 91372.11
Step E 46.1251 3690.01 7995.02 95940.21
Step F 48.4314 3874.51 8394.78 100737.31
Step G 50.8531 4068.25 8814.54 105774.45
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1067A Associate Electric Analyst-A Step A 40.9237 3273.90 7093.44 85121.30 Step B 42.9700 3437.60 7448.13 89377.60
Step C 45.1184 3609.47 7820.52 93846.27
Step D 47.3744 3789.95 8211.56 98538.75
Step E 49.7432 3979.46 8622.15 103465.86
Step F 52.2302 4178.42 9053.23 108638.82
Step G 54.8418 4387.34 9505.91 114070.94
0088A Associate Transportation Planner-A Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step C 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step D 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step E 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step F 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0910A Budget Analyst I-A Step A 39.8435 3187.48 6906.21 82874.48 Step B 41.8355 3346.84 7251.49 87017.84
Step C 43.9275 3514.20 7614.10 91369.20
Step D 46.1239 3689.91 7994.81 95937.71
Step E 48.4302 3874.42 8394.57 100734.82
Step F 50.8515 4068.12 8814.26 105771.12
Step G 53.3941 4271.53 9254.98 111059.73
0915A Budget Analyst II-A Step A 43.8288 3506.30 7596.99 91163.90 Step B 46.0201 3681.61 7976.82 95721.81
Step C 48.3214 3865.71 8375.71 100508.51
Step D 50.7372 4058.98 8794.45 105533.38
Step E 53.2742 4261.94 9234.19 110810.34
Step F 55.9381 4475.05 9695.94 116351.25
Step G 58.7349 4698.79 10180.72 122168.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0930A Budget Manager-A Step A 62.8047 5024.38 10886.15 130633.78 Step B 65.9450 5275.60 11430.47 137165.60
Step C 69.2423 5539.38 12002.00 144023.98
Step D 72.7043 5816.34 12602.08 151224.94
Step E 76.3395 6107.16 13232.18 158786.16
Step F 80.1566 6412.53 13893.81 166725.73
Step G 84.1643 6733.14 14588.48 175061.74
1043A Building Official-A Step A 63.1961 5055.69 10953.99 131447.89 Step B 66.3558 5308.46 11501.67 138020.06
Step C 69.6737 5573.90 12076.77 144921.30
Step D 73.1573 5852.58 12680.60 152167.18
Step E 76.8150 6145.20 13314.60 159775.20
Step F 80.6558 6452.46 13980.34 167764.06
Step G 84.6886 6775.09 14679.36 176152.29
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1141A Building Plans Examiner SupervisorA Step A 47.2133 3777.06 8183.64 98203.66 Step B 49.5740 3965.92 8592.83 103113.92
Step C 52.0527 4164.22 9022.47 108269.62
Step D 54.6553 4372.42 9473.59 113683.02
Step E 57.3881 4591.05 9947.27 119367.25
Step F 60.2575 4820.60 10444.63 125335.60
Step G 63.2703 5061.62 10966.85 131602.22
1180A Chief Information Officer-A Step A 85.5023 6840.18 14820.40 177844.78 Step B 89.7774 7182.19 15561.42 186736.99
Step C 94.2664 7541.31 16339.51 196074.11
Step D 98.9796 7918.37 17156.46 205877.57
Step E 103.9285 8314.28 18014.27 216171.28
Step F 109.1251 8730.01 18915.02 226980.21
Step G 114.5814 9166.51 19860.78 238329.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1220A City Clerk-A Step A 70.6620 5652.96 12248.08 146976.96 Step B 74.1951 5935.61 12860.48 154325.81
Step C 77.9049 6232.39 13503.52 162042.19
Step D 81.8002 6544.02 14178.70 170144.42
Step E 85.8901 6871.21 14887.62 178651.41
Step F 90.1847 7214.78 15632.01 187584.18
Step G 94.6939 7575.51 16413.61 196963.31
1142A City Librarian-A Step A 54.6637 4373.10 9475.04 113700.50 Step B 57.3969 4591.75 9948.80 119385.55
Step C 60.2665 4821.32 10446.19 125354.32
Step D 63.2803 5062.42 10968.59 131623.02
Step E 66.4439 5315.51 11516.94 138203.31
Step F 69.7664 5581.31 12092.84 145114.11
Step G 73.2547 5860.38 12697.48 152369.78
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1368A Code Enforcement Supervisor-A Step A 43.7167 3497.34 7577.56 90930.74 Step B 45.9025 3672.20 7956.43 95477.20
Step C 48.1979 3855.83 8354.30 100251.63
Step D 50.6077 4048.62 8772.00 105264.02
Step E 53.1380 4251.04 9210.59 110527.04
Step F 55.7948 4463.58 9671.10 116053.18
Step G 58.5847 4686.78 10154.68 121856.18
1027A Construction Inspection
Superintendent-A
Step A 49.1955 3935.64 8527.22 102326.64
Step B 51.6554 4132.43 8953.60 107443.23
Step C 54.2382 4339.06 9401.29 112815.46
Step D 56.9501 4556.01 9871.35 118456.21
Step E 59.7975 4783.80 10364.90 124378.80
Step F 62.7876 5023.01 10883.18 130598.21
Step G 65.9269 5274.15 11427.33 137127.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3740A Cultural Arts Supervisor-A Step A 39.7899 3183.19 6896.92 82762.99 Step B 41.7791 3342.33 7241.71 86900.53
Step C 43.8682 3509.46 7603.82 91245.86
Step D 46.0617 3684.94 7984.03 95808.34
Step E 48.3647 3869.18 8383.21 100598.58
Step F 50.7828 4062.62 8802.35 105628.22
Step G 53.3220 4265.76 9242.48 110909.76
1025A Custodian Supervisor-A Step A 26.8003 2144.02 4645.39 55744.62 Step B 28.1403 2251.22 4877.65 58531.82
Step C 29.5473 2363.78 5121.53 61458.38
Step D 31.0247 2481.98 5377.61 64531.38
Step E 32.5759 2606.07 5646.49 67757.87
Step F 34.2047 2736.38 5928.81 71145.78
Step G 35.9149 2873.19 6225.25 74702.99
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1150A Customer Care Manager-A Step A 54.4742 4357.94 9442.19 113306.34 Step B 57.1979 4575.83 9914.30 118971.63
Step C 60.0578 4804.62 10410.02 124920.22
Step D 63.0607 5044.86 10930.52 131166.26
Step E 66.2138 5297.10 11477.06 137724.70
Step F 69.5245 5561.96 12050.91 144610.96
Step G 73.0007 5840.06 12653.45 151841.46
9561A Data Management System
Administrator-A
Step A 56.6346 4530.77 9816.66 117799.97
Step B 59.4662 4757.30 10307.47 123689.70
Step C 62.4397 4995.18 10822.88 129874.58
Step D 65.5617 5244.94 11364.03 136368.34
Step E 68.8398 5507.18 11932.23 143186.78
Step F 72.2817 5782.54 12528.83 150345.94
Step G 75.8960 6071.68 13155.31 157863.68
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1645A Department Public Information
Officer-A
Step A 49.5024 3960.19 8580.42 102964.99
Step B 51.9778 4158.22 9009.49 108113.82
Step C 54.5766 4366.13 9459.94 113519.33
Step D 57.3054 4584.43 9932.94 119195.23
Step E 60.1707 4813.66 10429.59 125155.06
Step F 63.1793 5054.34 10951.08 131412.94
Step G 66.3381 5307.05 11498.60 137983.25
1655A Deputy City Attorney I-A Step A 67.5992 5407.94 11717.19 140606.34 Step B 70.9791 5678.33 12303.04 147636.53
Step C 74.5280 5962.24 12918.19 155018.24
Step D 78.2544 6260.35 13564.10 162769.15
Step E 82.1673 6573.38 14242.33 170907.98
Step F 86.2756 6902.05 14954.44 179453.25
Step G 90.5893 7247.14 15702.15 188425.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1658A Deputy City Attorney II-A Step A 74.3591 5948.73 12888.91 154666.93 Step B 78.0770 6246.16 13533.35 162400.16
Step C 81.9809 6558.47 14210.02 170520.27
Step D 86.0799 6886.39 14920.52 179046.19
Step E 90.3839 7230.71 15666.54 187998.51
Step F 94.9030 7592.24 16449.85 197398.24
Step G 99.6483 7971.86 17272.37 207268.46
1659A Deputy City Manager-A Step A 77.7283 6218.26 13472.91 161674.86 Step B 81.6147 6529.18 14146.55 169758.58
Step C 85.6954 6855.63 14853.87 178246.43
Step D 89.9802 7198.42 15596.57 187158.82
Step E 94.4792 7558.34 16376.39 196516.74
Step F 99.2032 7936.26 17195.22 206342.66
Step G 104.1633 8333.06 18054.97 216659.66
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1280A Development Services AdministratorA Step A 52.2948 4183.58 9064.43 108773.18 Step B 54.9095 4392.76 9517.65 114211.76
Step C 57.6550 4612.40 9993.53 119922.40
Step D 60.5376 4843.01 10493.18 125918.21
Step E 63.5647 5085.18 11017.88 132214.58
Step F 66.7431 5339.45 11568.80 138825.65
Step G 70.0799 5606.39 12147.18 145766.19
1676A Development Services Director-A Step A 85.5025 6840.20 14820.43 177845.20 Step B 89.7776 7182.21 15561.45 186737.41
Step C 94.2665 7541.32 16339.53 196074.32
Step D 98.9797 7918.38 17156.48 205877.78
Step E 103.9289 8314.31 18014.34 216172.11
Step F 109.1254 8730.03 18915.07 226980.83
Step G 114.5814 9166.51 19860.78 238329.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1695A Development Services Manager-A Step A 62.2290 4978.32 10786.36 129436.32 Step B 65.3403 5227.22 11325.65 135907.82
Step C 68.6074 5488.59 11891.95 142703.39
Step D 72.0378 5763.02 12486.55 149838.62
Step E 75.6397 6051.18 13110.88 157330.58
Step F 79.4219 6353.75 13766.46 165197.55
Step G 83.3930 6671.44 14454.79 173457.44
2415A EMS Quality Assurance CoordinatorA Step A 55.5366 4442.93 9626.34 115516.13 Step B 58.3133 4665.06 10107.64 121291.66
Step C 61.2292 4898.34 10613.06 127356.74
Step D 64.2908 5143.26 11143.74 133724.86
Step E 67.5051 5400.41 11700.88 140410.61
Step F 70.8805 5670.44 12285.95 147431.44
Step G 74.4244 5953.95 12900.23 154802.75
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6520A ERP Program Manager-A Step A 54.7230 4377.84 9485.32 113823.84 Step B 57.4589 4596.71 9959.54 119514.51
Step C 60.3317 4826.54 10457.49 125489.94
Step D 63.3484 5067.87 10980.39 131764.67
Step E 66.5157 5321.26 11529.39 138352.66
Step F 69.8416 5587.33 12105.88 145270.53
Step G 73.3338 5866.70 12711.19 152534.30
1674A Economic Development Analyst I-A Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 39.8453 3187.62 6906.52 82878.22
Step C 41.8374 3346.99 7251.82 87021.79
Step D 43.9296 3514.37 7614.46 91373.57
Step E 46.1260 3690.08 7995.17 95942.08
Step F 48.4324 3874.59 8394.95 100739.39
Step G 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1675A Economic Development Analyst II-A Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step C 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step D 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step E 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step F 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
1710A Economic Development Director-A Step A 81.4337 6514.70 14115.17 169382.10 Step B 85.5058 6840.46 14821.01 177852.06
Step C 89.7809 7182.47 15562.02 186744.27
Step D 94.2699 7541.59 16340.12 196081.39
Step E 98.9834 7918.67 17157.12 205885.47
Step F 103.9327 8314.62 18015.00 216180.02
Step G 109.1292 8730.34 18915.73 226988.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1118A Economic Development Manager-A Step A 56.4726 4517.81 9788.58 117463.01 Step B 59.2984 4743.87 10278.39 123340.67
Step C 62.2636 4981.09 10792.36 129508.29
Step D 65.3765 5230.12 11331.93 135983.12
Step E 68.6452 5491.62 11898.50 142782.02
Step F 72.0778 5766.22 12493.49 149921.82
Step G 75.6814 6054.51 13118.11 157417.31
1001A Economic Development Project
Manager-A
Step A 52.3696 4189.57 9077.40 108928.77
Step B 54.9880 4399.04 9531.25 114375.04
Step C 57.7374 4618.99 10007.82 120093.79
Step D 60.6242 4849.94 10508.19 126098.34
Step E 63.6554 5092.43 11033.60 132403.23
Step F 66.8383 5347.06 11585.31 139023.66
Step G 70.1802 5614.42 12164.57 145974.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1310A Electric Business Analyst I-A Step A 49.1088 3928.70 8512.19 102146.30 Step B 51.5643 4125.14 8937.81 107253.74
Step C 54.1426 4331.41 9384.72 112616.61
Step D 56.8496 4547.97 9853.93 118247.17
Step E 59.6922 4775.38 10346.65 124159.78
Step F 62.6768 5014.14 10863.98 130367.74
Step G 65.8106 5264.85 11407.17 136886.05
1312A Electric Business Analyst II-A Step A 54.0194 4321.55 9363.36 112360.35 Step B 56.7204 4537.63 9831.54 117978.43
Step C 59.5563 4764.50 10323.09 123877.10
Step D 62.5342 5002.74 10839.26 130071.14
Step E 65.6609 5252.87 11381.22 136574.67
Step F 68.9439 5515.51 11950.28 143403.31
Step G 72.3911 5791.29 12547.79 150573.49
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1066A Electric Compliance Analyst I-A Step A 49.1085 3928.68 8512.14 102145.68 Step B 51.5640 4125.12 8937.76 107253.12
Step C 54.1423 4331.38 9384.67 112615.98
Step D 56.8493 4547.94 9853.88 118246.54
Step E 59.6917 4775.34 10346.56 124158.74
Step F 62.6763 5014.10 10863.89 130366.70
Step G 65.8102 5264.82 11407.10 136885.22
2335A Electric Compliance Analyst II-A Step A 54.0202 4321.62 9363.50 112362.02 Step B 56.7213 4537.70 9831.69 117980.30
Step C 59.5574 4764.59 10323.28 123879.39
Step D 62.5351 5002.81 10839.42 130073.01
Step E 65.6619 5252.95 11381.40 136576.75
Step F 68.9450 5515.60 11950.47 143405.60
Step G 72.3923 5791.38 12548.00 150575.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual
1151A
Grade Name
Electric Customer
Programs and Public Affairs
Supervisor-A
Step A 68.3352 5466.82 11844.77 142137.22
Step B 71.7521 5740.17 12437.03 149244.37
Step C 75.3397 6027.18 13058.88 156706.58
Step D 79.1065 6328.52 13711.79 164541.52
Step E 83.0618 6644.94 14397.38 172768.54
Step F 87.2149 6977.19 15117.25 181406.99
Step G 91.5758 7326.06 15873.14 190477.66
1117A
Electric Economic and
Development Partnership ManagerA
Step A 75.1688 6013.50 13029.26 156351.10
Step B 78.9272 6314.18 13680.71 164168.58
Step C 82.8736 6629.89 14364.76 172377.09
Step D 87.0173 6961.38 15083.00 180995.98
Step E 91.3681 7309.45 15837.14 190045.65
Step F 95.9366 7674.93 16629.01 199548.13
Step G 100.7333 8058.66 17460.44 209525.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2284A Electric Engineering Technician
Supervisor-A
Step A 63.9585 5116.68 11086.14 133033.68
Step B 67.1563 5372.50 11640.43 139685.10
Step C 70.5141 5641.13 12222.44 146669.33
Step D 74.0399 5923.19 12833.58 154002.99
Step E 77.7417 6219.34 13475.23 161702.74
Step F 81.6289 6530.31 14149.01 169788.11
Step G 85.7104 6856.83 14856.47 178277.63
2338A Electric Operations Manager-A Step A 97.7818 7822.54 16948.85 203386.14 Step B 102.6708 8213.66 17796.27 213555.26
Step C 107.8043 8624.34 18686.08 224232.94
Step D 113.1947 9055.58 19620.41 235444.98
Step E 118.8545 9508.36 20601.45 247217.36
Step F 124.7971 9983.77 21631.50 259577.97
Step G 131.0368 10482.94 22713.05 272556.54
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2339A Electric Operations Supervisor-A Step A 88.8965 7111.72 15408.73 184904.72 Step B 93.3415 7467.32 16179.19 194150.32
Step C 98.0085 7840.68 16988.14 203857.68
Step D 102.9087 8232.70 17837.51 214050.10
Step E 108.0543 8644.34 18729.41 224752.94
Step F 113.4571 9076.57 19665.90 235990.77
Step G 119.1298 9530.38 20649.17 247789.98
2314A Electric Resources Planner I-A Step A 56.7179 4537.43 9831.10 117973.23 Step B 59.5538 4764.30 10322.66 123871.90
Step C 62.5315 5002.52 10838.79 130065.52
Step D 65.6580 5252.64 11380.72 136568.64
Step E 68.9410 5515.28 11949.77 143397.28
Step F 72.3880 5791.04 12547.25 150567.04
Step G 76.0075 6080.60 13174.63 158095.60
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2316A Electric Resources Planner II-A Step A 62.3896 4991.17 10814.20 129770.37 Step B 65.5092 5240.74 11354.93 136259.14
Step C 68.7845 5502.76 11922.65 143071.76
Step D 72.2238 5777.90 12518.79 150225.50
Step E 75.8350 6066.80 13144.73 157736.80
Step F 79.6268 6370.14 13801.98 165623.74
Step G 83.6083 6688.66 14492.11 173905.26
2216A Electric Risk and Compliance
Supervisor-A
Step A 68.3314 5466.51 11844.11 142129.31
Step B 71.7479 5739.83 12436.30 149235.63
Step C 75.3354 6026.83 13058.14 156697.63
Step D 79.1020 6328.16 13711.01 164532.16
Step E 83.0573 6644.58 14396.60 172759.18
Step F 87.2101 6976.81 15116.42 181397.01
Step G 91.5705 7325.64 15872.22 190466.64
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2352A Electric Safety Coordinator-A Step A 41.7429 3339.43 7235.44 86825.23 Step B 43.8298 3506.38 7597.17 91165.98
Step C 46.0213 3681.70 7977.03 95724.30
Step D 48.3225 3865.80 8375.90 100510.80
Step E 50.7384 4059.07 8794.66 105535.87
Step F 53.2753 4262.02 9234.39 110812.62
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
2319A Electric Substation Supervisor-A Step A 88.8965 7111.72 15408.73 184904.72 Step B 93.3415 7467.32 16179.19 194150.32
Step C 98.0085 7840.68 16988.14 203857.68
Step D 102.9087 8232.70 17837.51 214050.10
Step E 108.0543 8644.34 18729.41 224752.94
Step F 113.4571 9076.57 19665.90 235990.77
Step G 119.1298 9530.38 20649.17 247789.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9560A Electric Technology Systems
Administrator-A
Step A 68.3353 5466.82 11844.79 142137.42
Step B 71.7521 5740.17 12437.03 149244.37
Step C 75.3396 6027.17 13058.86 156706.37
Step D 79.1065 6328.52 13711.79 164541.52
Step E 83.0619 6644.95 14397.40 172768.75
Step F 87.2151 6977.21 15117.28 181407.41
Step G 91.5758 7326.06 15873.14 190477.66
1116A Electric Utility Chief Operating
Officer-A
Step A 123.6941 9895.53 21440.31 257283.73
Step B 129.8789 10390.31 22512.34 270148.11
Step C 136.3728 10909.82 23637.95 283655.42
Step D 143.1915 11455.32 24819.86 297838.32
Step E 150.3511 12028.09 26060.86 312730.29
Step F 157.8686 12629.49 27363.89 328366.69
Step G 165.7620 13260.96 28732.08 344784.96
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2320A Electric Utility Director-A Step A 140.5631 11245.05 24364.27 292371.25 Step B 147.5913 11807.30 25582.49 306989.90
Step C 154.9710 12397.68 26861.64 322339.68
Step D 162.7195 13017.56 28204.71 338456.56
Step E 170.8555 13668.44 29614.95 355379.44
Step F 179.3982 14351.86 31095.69 373148.26
Step G 188.3681 15069.45 32650.47 391805.65
2215A Electric Utility Financial AdministratorA Step A 68.3348 5466.78 11844.70 142136.38 Step B 71.7514 5740.11 12436.91 149242.91
Step C 75.3390 6027.12 13058.76 156705.12
Step D 79.1059 6328.47 13711.69 164540.27
Step E 83.0613 6644.90 14397.29 172767.50
Step F 87.2143 6977.14 15117.15 181405.74
Step G 91.5752 7326.02 15873.03 190476.42
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2378A Electronic Maintenance CoordinatorA Step A 46.0454 3683.63 7981.20 95774.43 Step B 48.3477 3867.82 8380.27 100563.22
Step C 50.7651 4061.21 8799.28 105591.41
Step D 53.3033 4264.26 9239.24 110870.86
Step E 55.9684 4477.47 9701.19 116414.27
Step F 58.7668 4701.34 10186.25 122234.94
Step G 61.7051 4936.41 10695.55 128346.61
2500A Energy Services Account
Representative I-A
Step A 48.9290 3914.32 8481.03 101772.32
Step B 51.3755 4110.04 8905.09 106861.04
Step C 53.9442 4315.54 9350.33 112203.94
Step D 56.6414 4531.31 9817.84 117814.11
Step E 59.4736 4757.89 10308.76 123705.09
Step F 62.4472 4995.78 10824.18 129890.18
Step G 65.5695 5245.56 11365.38 136384.56
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2501A Energy Services Account
Representative II-A
Step A 53.8220 4305.76 9329.15 111949.76
Step B 56.5131 4521.05 9795.60 117547.25
Step C 59.3387 4747.10 10285.37 123424.50
Step D 62.3057 4984.46 10799.65 129595.86
Step E 65.4211 5233.69 11339.66 136075.89
Step F 68.6921 5495.37 11906.63 142879.57
Step G 72.1267 5770.14 12501.96 150023.54
1277A Engineering Manager-A Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.1917 5615.34 12166.56 145998.74
Step C 73.7007 5896.06 12774.79 153297.46
Step D 77.3861 6190.89 13413.59 160963.09
Step E 81.2552 6500.42 14084.23 169010.82
Step F 85.3178 6825.42 14788.42 177461.02
Step G 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2540A Environmental Coordinator-A Step A 48.0045 3840.36 8320.78 99849.36 Step B 50.4047 4032.38 8736.81 104841.78
Step C 52.9251 4234.01 9173.68 110084.21
Step D 55.5712 4445.70 9632.34 115588.10
Step E 58.3499 4667.99 10113.98 121367.79
Step F 61.2671 4901.37 10619.63 127435.57
Step G 64.3306 5146.45 11150.64 133807.65
2546A Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst I-A
Step A 39.8435 3187.48 6906.21 82874.48
Step B 41.8356 3346.85 7251.50 87018.05
Step C 43.9275 3514.20 7614.10 91369.20
Step D 46.1238 3689.90 7994.79 95937.50
Step E 48.4301 3874.41 8394.55 100734.61
Step F 50.8516 4068.13 8814.28 105771.33
Step G 53.3941 4271.53 9254.98 111059.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2547A Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst II-A
Step A 43.8288 3506.30 7596.99 91163.90
Step B 46.0203 3681.62 7976.85 95722.22
Step C 48.3214 3865.71 8375.71 100508.51
Step D 50.7372 4058.98 8794.45 105533.38
Step E 53.2742 4261.94 9234.19 110810.34
Step F 55.9381 4475.05 9695.94 116351.25
Step G 58.7349 4698.79 10180.72 122168.59
1122A Environmental Utilities Business
Services Manager-A
Step A 63.6319 5090.55 11029.53 132354.35
Step B 66.8136 5345.09 11581.02 138972.29
Step C 70.1543 5612.34 12160.08 145920.94
Step D 73.6619 5892.95 12768.06 153216.75
Step E 77.3450 6187.60 13406.47 160877.60
Step F 81.2123 6496.98 14076.80 168921.58
Step G 85.2729 6821.83 14780.64 177367.63
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2541A Environmental Utilities Compliance
Administrator-A
Step A 50.0900 4007.20 8682.27 104187.20
Step B 52.5944 4207.55 9116.36 109396.35
Step C 55.2241 4417.93 9572.18 114866.13
Step D 57.9854 4638.83 10050.80 120609.63
Step E 60.8845 4870.76 10553.31 126639.76
Step F 63.9288 5114.30 11080.99 132971.90
Step G 67.1251 5370.01 11635.02 139620.21
1684A Environmental Utilities Director-A Step A 96.0927 7687.42 16656.07 199872.82 Step B 100.8972 8071.78 17488.85 209866.18
Step C 105.9422 8475.38 18363.31 220359.78
Step D 111.2392 8899.14 19281.46 231377.54
Step E 116.8012 9344.10 20245.54 242946.50
Step F 122.6413 9811.30 21257.83 255093.90
Step G 128.7732 10301.86 22320.69 267848.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1024A Environmental Utilities Maintenance
Superintendent-A
Step A 59.5303 4762.42 10318.59 123823.02
Step B 62.5067 5000.54 10834.49 130013.94
Step C 65.6320 5250.56 11376.21 136514.56
Step D 68.9136 5513.09 11945.02 143340.29
Step E 72.3593 5788.74 12542.28 150507.34
Step F 75.9773 6078.18 13169.40 158032.78
Step G 79.7761 6382.09 13827.86 165934.29
1147A Environmental Utilities Operations
Superintendent-A
Step A 57.1887 4575.10 9912.71 118952.50
Step B 60.0481 4803.85 10408.34 124900.05
Step C 63.0505 5044.04 10928.75 131145.04
Step D 66.2030 5296.24 11475.19 137702.24
Step E 69.5132 5561.06 12048.95 144587.46
Step F 72.9888 5839.10 12651.39 151816.70
Step G 76.6383 6131.06 13283.97 159407.66
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4321A Facilities Supervisor-A Step A 40.2709 3221.67 6980.29 83763.47 Step B 42.2846 3382.77 7329.33 87951.97
Step C 44.3986 3551.89 7695.76 92349.09
Step D 46.6186 3729.49 8080.56 96966.69
Step E 48.9496 3915.97 8484.60 101815.17
Step F 51.3970 4111.76 8908.81 106905.76
Step G 53.9669 4317.35 9354.26 112251.15
2900A Finance Manager-A Step A 62.8047 5024.38 10886.15 130633.78 Step B 65.9450 5275.60 11430.47 137165.60
Step C 69.2423 5539.38 12002.00 144023.98
Step D 72.7043 5816.34 12602.08 151224.94
Step E 76.3395 6107.16 13232.18 158786.16
Step F 80.1566 6412.53 13893.81 166725.73
Step G 84.1643 6733.14 14588.48 175061.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0905ZA Fire Battalion Chief 8Hr-ZA Step A 61.5522 4924.18 10669.05 128028.58 Step B 64.6298 5170.38 11202.50 134429.98
Step C 67.8612 5428.90 11762.61 141151.30
Step D 71.2543 5700.34 12350.75 148208.94
Step E 74.8171 5985.37 12968.30 155619.57
Step F 78.5579 6284.63 13616.70 163400.43
Step G 82.4855 6598.84 14297.49 171569.84
0905A Fire Battalion Chief-A Step A 43.9657 4924.16 10669.01 128028.12 Step B 46.1640 5170.37 11202.46 134429.57
Step C 48.4723 5428.90 11762.61 141151.34
Step D 50.8959 5700.34 12350.74 148208.86
Step E 53.4407 5985.36 12968.28 155619.32
Step F 56.1128 6284.63 13616.71 163400.47
Step G 58.9184 6598.86 14297.53 171570.38
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3330A Fire Chief-A Step A 89.2835 7142.68 15475.81 185709.68 Step B 93.7478 7499.82 16249.62 194995.42
Step C 98.4349 7874.79 17062.05 204744.59
Step D 103.3569 8268.55 17915.20 214982.35
Step E 108.5247 8681.98 18810.95 225731.38
Step F 113.9506 9116.05 19751.44 237017.25
Step G 119.6482 9571.86 20739.02 248868.26
3332A Fire Division Chief-A Step A 67.7097 5416.78 11736.35 140836.18 Step B 71.0950 5687.60 12323.13 147877.60
Step C 74.6500 5972.00 12939.33 155272.00
Step D 78.3824 6270.59 13586.28 163035.39
Step E 82.3016 6584.13 14265.61 171187.33
Step F 86.4165 6913.32 14978.86 179746.32
Step G 90.7374 7258.99 15727.82 188733.79
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3332ZA Fire Divison Chief 24Hr-ZA Step A 48.3641 5416.78 11736.35 140836.26 Step B 50.7823 5687.62 12323.17 147878.06
Step C 53.3212 5971.97 12939.28 155271.33
Step D 55.9873 6270.58 13586.25 163035.02
Step E 58.7867 6584.11 14265.57 171186.87
Step F 61.7260 6913.31 14978.84 179746.11
Step G 64.8123 7258.98 15727.78 188733.42
2565A Fleet Services Supervisor-A Step A 40.0219 3201.75 6937.13 83245.55 Step B 42.0229 3361.83 7283.97 87407.63
Step C 44.1241 3529.93 7648.18 91778.13
Step D 46.3304 3706.43 8030.60 96367.23
Step E 48.6469 3891.75 8432.13 101185.55
Step F 51.0792 4086.34 8853.73 106244.74
Step G 53.6332 4290.66 9296.42 111557.06
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3451A Government Relations AdministratorA Step A 57.6027 4608.22 9984.47 119813.62 Step B 60.4827 4838.62 10483.67 125804.02
Step C 63.5069 5080.55 11007.86 132094.35
Step D 66.6823 5334.58 11558.27 138699.18
Step E 70.0164 5601.31 12136.18 145634.11
Step F 73.5171 5881.37 12742.96 152915.57
Step G 77.1930 6175.44 13380.12 160561.44
1647A Government Relations
Representative I-A
Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84
Step B 39.8453 3187.62 6906.52 82878.22
Step C 41.8374 3346.99 7251.82 87021.79
Step D 43.9296 3514.37 7614.46 91373.57
Step E 46.1260 3690.08 7995.17 95942.08
Step F 48.4324 3874.59 8394.95 100739.39
Step G 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1648A Government Relations
Representative II-A
Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44
Step B 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step C 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step D 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step E 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step F 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
3589A Housing Manager-A Step A 56.4726 4517.81 9788.58 117463.01 Step B 59.2984 4743.87 10278.39 123340.67
Step C 62.2636 4981.09 10792.36 129508.29
Step D 65.3765 5230.12 11331.93 135983.12
Step E 68.6452 5491.62 11898.50 142782.02
Step F 72.0778 5766.22 12493.49 149921.82
Step G 75.6814 6054.51 13118.11 157417.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3590A Housing Supervisor-A Step A 43.6423 3491.38 7564.67 90775.98 Step B 45.8244 3665.95 7942.90 95314.75
Step C 48.1155 3849.24 8340.02 100080.24
Step D 50.5215 4041.72 8757.06 105084.72
Step E 53.0472 4243.78 9194.85 110338.18
Step F 55.6998 4455.98 9654.63 115855.58
Step G 58.4848 4678.78 10137.37 121648.38
3594A Human Resources Analyst I-A Step A 38.9323 3114.58 6748.27 80979.18 Step B 40.8789 3270.31 7085.68 85028.11
Step C 42.9228 3433.82 7439.95 89279.42
Step D 45.0691 3605.53 7811.98 93743.73
Step E 47.3225 3785.80 8202.57 98430.80
Step F 49.6885 3975.08 8612.67 103352.08
Step G 52.1730 4173.84 9043.32 108519.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3596A Human Resources Analyst II-A Step A 42.8255 3426.04 7423.09 89077.04 Step B 44.9667 3597.34 7794.23 93530.74
Step C 47.2151 3777.21 8183.95 98207.41
Step D 49.5759 3966.07 8593.16 103117.87
Step E 52.0547 4164.38 9022.81 108273.78
Step F 54.6573 4372.58 9473.93 113687.18
Step G 57.3903 4591.22 9947.65 119371.82
3598A Human Resources Director-A Step A 81.4310 6514.48 14114.71 169376.48 Step B 85.5026 6840.21 14820.45 177845.41
Step C 89.7777 7182.22 15561.47 186737.62
Step D 94.2665 7541.32 16339.53 196074.32
Step E 98.9799 7918.39 17156.52 205878.19
Step F 103.9290 8314.32 18014.36 216172.32
Step G 109.1254 8730.03 18915.07 226980.83
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3599A Human Resources Manager-A Step A 54.1735 4333.88 9390.07 112680.88 Step B 56.8821 4550.57 9859.56 118314.77
Step C 59.7264 4778.11 10352.58 124230.91
Step D 62.7127 5017.02 10870.20 130442.42
Step E 65.8483 5267.86 11413.71 136964.46
Step F 69.1409 5531.27 11984.42 143813.07
Step G 72.5981 5807.85 12583.67 151004.05
1002A Hydrogeologist-A Step A 59.4196 4753.57 10299.40 123592.77 Step B 62.3905 4991.24 10814.35 129772.24
Step C 65.5101 5240.81 11355.08 136261.01
Step D 68.7857 5502.86 11922.85 143074.26
Step E 72.2250 5778.00 12519.00 150228.00
Step F 75.8362 6066.90 13144.94 157739.30
Step G 79.6278 6370.22 13802.15 165625.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3625A Information Security Administrator-A Step A 54.7221 4377.77 9485.16 113821.97 Step B 57.4583 4596.66 9959.44 119513.26
Step C 60.3311 4826.49 10457.39 125488.69
Step D 63.3477 5067.82 10980.27 131763.22
Step E 66.5151 5321.21 11529.28 138351.41
Step F 69.8408 5587.26 12105.74 145268.86
Step G 73.3330 5866.64 12711.05 152532.64
9542A Information Technology Client
Services Supervisor-A
Step A 47.7791 3822.33 8281.71 99380.53
Step B 50.1681 4013.45 8695.80 104349.65
Step C 52.6766 4214.13 9130.61 109567.33
Step D 55.3103 4424.82 9587.12 115045.42
Step E 58.0759 4646.07 10066.49 120797.87
Step F 60.9796 4878.37 10569.80 126837.57
Step G 64.0287 5122.30 11098.31 133179.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3602A Information Technology Program
Manager-A
Step A 54.7230 4377.84 9485.32 113823.84
Step B 57.4589 4596.71 9959.54 119514.51
Step C 60.3317 4826.54 10457.49 125489.94
Step D 63.3484 5067.87 10980.39 131764.67
Step E 66.5157 5321.26 11529.39 138352.66
Step F 69.8416 5587.33 12105.88 145270.53
Step G 73.3338 5866.70 12711.19 152534.30
1140A Intelligent Transportation Systems
Maintenance Supervisor-A
Step A 58.2457 4659.66 10095.92 121151.06
Step B 61.1580 4892.64 10600.72 127208.64
Step C 64.2159 5137.27 11130.76 133569.07
Step D 67.4267 5394.14 11687.29 140247.54
Step E 70.7981 5663.85 12271.67 147260.05
Step F 74.3380 5947.04 12885.25 154623.04
Step G 78.0549 6244.39 13529.52 162354.19
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3810A Key Accounts Representative-A Step A 59.2013 4736.10 10261.56 123138.70 Step B 62.1615 4972.92 10774.66 129295.92
Step C 65.2695 5221.56 11313.38 135760.56
Step D 68.5330 5482.64 11879.05 142548.64
Step E 71.9597 5756.78 12473.01 149676.18
Step F 75.5577 6044.62 13096.67 157160.02
Step G 79.3355 6346.84 13751.49 165017.84
9544A Library Supervisor-A Step A 38.0866 3046.93 6601.68 79220.13 Step B 39.9907 3199.26 6931.72 83180.66
Step C 41.9904 3359.23 7278.34 87340.03
Step D 44.0899 3527.19 7642.25 91706.99
Step E 46.2944 3703.55 8024.36 96292.35
Step F 48.6090 3888.72 8425.56 101106.72
Step G 51.0395 4083.16 8846.85 106162.16
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4449A Management Analyst - City Manager
Office-A
Step A 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step B 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step C 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step D 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step E 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step F 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
Step G 58.7362 4698.90 10180.94 122171.30
0045A Management Analyst I-A Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 39.8453 3187.62 6906.52 82878.22
Step C 41.8374 3346.99 7251.82 87021.79
Step D 43.9296 3514.37 7614.46 91373.57
Step E 46.1260 3690.08 7995.17 95942.08
Step F 48.4324 3874.59 8394.95 100739.39
Step G 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0050A Management Analyst II-A Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step C 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step D 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step E 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step F 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
5020A Park Development Project Manager IA Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 39.8453 3187.62 6906.52 82878.22
Step C 41.8374 3346.99 7251.82 87021.79
Step D 43.9296 3514.37 7614.46 91373.57
Step E 46.1260 3690.08 7995.17 95942.08
Step F 48.4324 3874.59 8394.95 100739.39
Step G 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5022A Park Development Project Manager
II-A
Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44
Step B 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step C 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step D 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step E 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step F 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
1106A Park Planning and Development
Manager-A
Step A 52.8062 4224.50 9153.07 109836.90
Step B 55.4471 4435.77 9610.83 115329.97
Step C 58.2196 4657.57 10091.40 121096.77
Step D 61.1305 4890.44 10595.95 127151.44
Step E 64.1870 5134.96 11125.75 133508.96
Step F 67.3964 5391.71 11682.04 140184.51
Step G 70.7662 5661.30 12266.14 147193.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5082A Parks Recreation and Libraries
Director-A
Step A 85.5031 6840.25 14820.54 177846.45
Step B 89.7783 7182.26 15561.57 186738.86
Step C 94.2670 7541.36 16339.61 196075.36
Step D 98.9803 7918.42 17156.59 205879.02
Step E 103.9295 8314.36 18014.45 216173.36
Step F 109.1259 8730.07 18915.16 226981.87
Step G 114.5823 9166.58 19860.93 238331.18
9547A Parks Recreation and Libraries
Manager-A
Step A 54.6637 4373.10 9475.04 113700.50
Step B 57.3969 4591.75 9948.80 119385.55
Step C 60.2665 4821.32 10446.19 125354.32
Step D 63.2803 5062.42 10968.59 131623.02
Step E 66.4439 5315.51 11516.94 138203.31
Step F 69.7664 5581.31 12092.84 145114.11
Step G 73.2547 5860.38 12697.48 152369.78
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9546A Parks and Open Space
Superintendent-A
Step A 45.9191 3673.53 7959.31 95511.73
Step B 48.2151 3857.21 8357.28 100287.41
Step C 50.6258 4050.06 8775.14 105301.66
Step D 53.1570 4252.56 9213.88 110566.56
Step E 55.8153 4465.22 9674.65 116095.82
Step F 58.6058 4688.46 10158.34 121900.06
Step G 61.5358 4922.86 10666.21 127994.46
5069A Parks and Open Space Supervisor-A Step A 38.0866 3046.93 6601.68 79220.13 Step B 39.9907 3199.26 6931.72 83180.66
Step C 41.9904 3359.23 7278.34 87340.03
Step D 44.0899 3527.19 7642.25 91706.99
Step E 46.2944 3703.55 8024.36 96292.35
Step F 48.6090 3888.72 8425.56 101106.72
Step G 51.0395 4083.16 8846.85 106162.16
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1124A Payroll Analyst I-A Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 39.8453 3187.62 6906.52 82878.22
Step C 41.8374 3346.99 7251.82 87021.79
Step D 43.9296 3514.37 7614.46 91373.57
Step E 46.1260 3690.08 7995.17 95942.08
Step F 48.4324 3874.59 8394.95 100739.39
Step G 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
1125A Payroll Analyst II-A Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step C 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step D 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step E 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step F 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9428A Payroll Supervisor-A Step A 49.6233 3969.86 8601.37 103216.46 Step B 52.1044 4168.35 9031.43 108377.15
Step C 54.7096 4376.77 9483.00 113795.97
Step D 57.4450 4595.60 9957.13 119485.60
Step E 60.3173 4825.38 10455.00 125459.98
Step F 63.3332 5066.66 10977.75 131733.06
Step G 66.4999 5319.99 11526.65 138319.79
1501A Permits Supervisor-A Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step C 46.0214 3681.71 7977.04 95724.51
Step D 48.3227 3865.82 8375.93 100511.22
Step E 50.7385 4059.08 8794.67 105536.08
Step F 53.2756 4262.05 9234.44 110813.25
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5309A Planning Manager-A Step A 66.4534 5316.27 11518.59 138223.07 Step B 69.7760 5582.08 12094.51 145134.08
Step C 73.2649 5861.19 12699.25 152390.99
Step D 76.9282 6154.26 13334.22 160010.66
Step E 80.7747 6461.98 14000.95 168011.38
Step F 84.8135 6785.08 14701.01 176412.08
Step G 89.0539 7124.31 15436.01 185232.11
5400A Police Captain-A Step A 75.3795 6030.36 13065.78 156789.36 Step B 79.1483 6331.86 13719.04 164628.46
Step C 83.1058 6648.46 14405.01 172860.06
Step D 87.2613 6980.90 15125.29 181503.50
Step E 91.6243 7329.94 15881.55 190578.54
Step F 96.2054 7696.43 16675.60 200107.23
Step G 101.0157 8081.26 17509.39 210112.66
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5410A Police Chief-A Step A 98.5831 7886.65 17087.74 205052.85 Step B 103.5124 8280.99 17942.15 215305.79
Step C 108.6878 8695.02 18839.22 226070.62
Step D 114.1224 9129.79 19781.22 237374.59
Step E 119.8284 9586.27 20770.26 249243.07
Step F 125.8200 10065.60 21808.80 261705.60
Step G 132.1109 10568.87 22899.22 274790.67
5420A Police Lieutenant-A Step A 62.8195 5025.56 10888.71 130664.56 Step B 65.9607 5276.86 11433.19 137198.26
Step C 69.2586 5540.69 12004.82 144057.89
Step D 72.7215 5817.72 12605.06 151260.72
Step E 76.3577 6108.62 13235.33 158824.02
Step F 80.1755 6414.04 13897.09 166765.04
Step G 84.1844 6734.75 14591.96 175103.55
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5489A Police Services Administrator-A Step A 55.9340 4474.72 9695.23 116342.72 Step B 58.7307 4698.46 10179.99 122159.86
Step C 61.6672 4933.38 10688.98 128267.78
Step D 64.7507 5180.06 11223.45 134681.46
Step E 67.9882 5439.06 11784.62 141415.46
Step F 71.3876 5711.01 12373.85 148486.21
Step G 74.9570 5996.56 12992.55 155910.56
1138A Police Social Services Practitioner I-A Step A 35.3582 2828.66 6128.75 73545.06 Step B 37.1261 2970.09 6435.19 77222.29
Step C 38.9824 3118.59 6756.95 81083.39
Step D 40.9315 3274.52 7094.79 85137.52
Step E 42.9781 3438.25 7449.54 89394.45
Step F 45.1270 3610.16 7822.01 93864.16
Step G 47.3834 3790.67 8213.12 98557.47
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1139A Police Social Services Practitioner IIA Step A 38.8940 3111.52 6741.63 80899.52 Step B 40.8387 3267.10 7078.71 84944.50
Step C 42.8807 3430.46 7432.65 89191.86
Step D 45.0247 3601.98 7804.28 93651.38
Step E 47.2759 3782.07 8194.49 98333.87
Step F 49.6397 3971.18 8604.21 103250.58
Step G 52.1217 4169.74 9034.43 108413.14
1126A Police Social Services Supervisor-A Step A 44.7281 3578.25 7752.87 93034.45 Step B 46.9645 3757.16 8140.51 97686.16
Step C 49.3128 3945.02 8547.55 102570.62
Step D 51.7784 4142.27 8974.92 107699.07
Step E 54.3673 4349.38 9423.67 113083.98
Step F 57.0857 4566.86 9894.85 118738.26
Step G 59.9400 4795.20 10389.60 124675.20
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5505A Power Engineering Manager-A Step A 86.3391 6907.13 14965.44 179585.33 Step B 90.6561 7252.49 15713.72 188564.69
Step C 95.1889 7615.11 16499.41 197992.91
Step D 99.9483 7995.86 17324.37 207892.46
Step E 104.9458 8395.66 18190.61 218287.26
Step F 110.1930 8815.44 19100.12 229201.44
Step G 115.7026 9256.21 20055.12 240661.41
5600A Power Generation Superintendent-A Step A 86.8145 6945.16 15047.85 180574.16 Step B 91.1552 7292.42 15800.23 189602.82
Step C 95.7129 7657.03 16590.24 199082.83
Step D 100.4986 8039.89 17419.76 209037.09
Step E 105.5237 8441.90 18290.77 219489.30
Step F 110.7998 8863.98 19205.30 230463.58
Step G 116.3397 9307.18 20165.55 241986.58
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5530A Power Plant Operations and
Maintenance Supervisor-A
Step A 78.9232 6313.86 13680.02 164160.26
Step B 82.8695 6629.56 14364.05 172368.56
Step C 87.0129 6961.03 15082.24 180986.83
Step D 91.3635 7309.08 15836.34 190036.08
Step E 95.9318 7674.54 16628.18 199538.14
Step F 100.7283 8058.26 17459.57 209514.86
Step G 105.7648 8461.18 18332.57 219990.78
5535A Power Supply and Portfolio
Administrator-A
Step A 86.3352 6906.82 14964.77 179577.22
Step B 90.6520 7252.16 15713.01 188556.16
Step C 95.1846 7614.77 16498.66 197983.97
Step D 99.9437 7995.50 17323.57 207882.90
Step E 104.9410 8395.28 18189.77 218277.28
Step F 110.1880 8815.04 19099.25 229191.04
Step G 115.6974 9255.79 20054.22 240650.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5519A Preventative Maintenance
Supervisor-A
Step A 54.1184 4329.47 9380.52 112566.27
Step B 56.8243 4545.94 9849.55 118194.54
Step C 59.6656 4773.25 10342.04 124104.45
Step D 62.6488 5011.90 10859.13 130309.50
Step E 65.7813 5262.50 11402.09 136825.10
Step F 69.0703 5525.62 11972.19 143666.22
Step G 72.5238 5801.90 12570.79 150849.50
5514A Principal Engineer-A Step A 59.4196 4753.57 10299.40 123592.77 Step B 62.3905 4991.24 10814.35 129772.24
Step C 65.5101 5240.81 11355.08 136261.01
Step D 68.7857 5502.86 11922.85 143074.26
Step E 72.2250 5778.00 12519.00 150228.00
Step F 75.8362 6066.90 13144.94 157739.30
Step G 79.6278 6370.22 13802.15 165625.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5513A Principal Planner-A Step A 55.3792 4430.34 9599.06 115188.74 Step B 58.1482 4651.86 10079.02 120948.26
Step C 61.0556 4884.45 10582.97 126995.65
Step D 64.1083 5128.66 11112.11 133345.26
Step E 67.3138 5385.10 11667.73 140012.70
Step F 70.6794 5654.35 12251.10 147013.15
Step G 74.2135 5937.08 12863.67 154364.08
1114A Principal Power Engineer-A Step A 82.5816 6606.53 14314.14 171769.73 Step B 86.7107 6936.86 15029.85 180358.26
Step C 91.0462 7283.70 15781.34 189376.10
Step D 95.5986 7647.89 16570.42 198845.09
Step E 100.3785 8030.28 17398.94 208787.28
Step F 105.3975 8431.80 18268.90 219226.80
Step G 110.6673 8853.38 19182.33 230187.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1115A Principal Power Plant Engineer-A Step A 82.5816 6606.53 14314.14 171769.73 Step B 86.7107 6936.86 15029.85 180358.26
Step C 91.0462 7283.70 15781.34 189376.10
Step D 95.5986 7647.89 16570.42 198845.09
Step E 100.3785 8030.28 17398.94 208787.28
Step F 105.3975 8431.80 18268.90 219226.80
Step G 110.6673 8853.38 19182.33 230187.98
1004A Process Engineer-A Step A 59.4196 4753.57 10299.40 123592.77 Step B 62.3905 4991.24 10814.35 129772.24
Step C 65.5101 5240.81 11355.08 136261.01
Step D 68.7857 5502.86 11922.85 143074.26
Step E 72.2250 5778.00 12519.00 150228.00
Step F 75.8362 6066.90 13144.94 157739.30
Step G 79.6278 6370.22 13802.15 165625.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1069A Project Supervisor-A Step A 51.6694 4133.55 8956.03 107472.35 Step B 54.2530 4340.24 9403.85 112846.24
Step C 56.9656 4557.25 9874.04 118488.45
Step D 59.8137 4785.10 10367.71 124412.50
Step E 62.8045 5024.36 10886.11 130633.36
Step F 65.9448 5275.58 11430.43 137165.18
Step G 69.2420 5539.36 12001.95 144023.36
1108A Public Affairs and Communications
Manager-A
Step A 56.9260 4554.08 9867.17 118406.08
Step B 59.7724 4781.79 10360.55 124326.59
Step C 62.7609 5020.87 10878.56 130542.67
Step D 65.8990 5271.92 11422.49 137069.92
Step E 69.1939 5535.51 11993.61 143923.31
Step F 72.6537 5812.30 12593.31 151119.70
Step G 76.2864 6102.91 13222.98 158675.71
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5635A Public Works Director-A Step A 85.5045 6840.36 14820.78 177849.36 Step B 89.7798 7182.38 15561.83 186741.98
Step C 94.2689 7541.51 16339.94 196079.31
Step D 98.9823 7918.58 17156.93 205883.18
Step E 103.9314 8314.51 18014.78 216177.31
Step F 109.1279 8730.23 18915.50 226986.03
Step G 114.5843 9166.74 19861.28 238335.34
1087A Public Works Manager-A Step A 56.8363 4546.90 9851.63 118219.50 Step B 59.6783 4774.26 10344.24 124130.86
Step C 62.6621 5012.97 10861.43 130337.17
Step D 65.7951 5263.61 11404.48 136853.81
Step E 69.0850 5526.80 11974.73 143696.80
Step F 72.5392 5803.14 12573.46 150881.54
Step G 76.1663 6093.30 13202.16 158425.90
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1129A Purchasing Supervisor-A Step A 41.8409 3347.27 7252.42 87029.07 Step B 43.9329 3514.63 7615.04 91380.43
Step C 46.1296 3690.37 7995.80 95949.57
Step D 48.4360 3874.88 8395.57 100746.88
Step E 50.8579 4068.63 8815.37 105784.43
Step F 53.4008 4272.06 9256.14 111073.66
Step G 56.0708 4485.66 9718.94 116627.26
5652A Purchasing and Warehouse
Manager-A
Step A 54.1615 4332.92 9387.99 112655.92
Step B 56.8696 4549.57 9857.40 118288.77
Step C 59.7130 4777.04 10350.25 124203.04
Step D 62.6987 5015.90 10867.77 130413.30
Step E 65.8337 5266.70 11411.17 136934.10
Step F 69.1254 5530.03 11981.74 143780.83
Step G 72.5816 5806.53 12580.81 150969.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1143A Recreation Superintendent-A Step A 45.9191 3673.53 7959.31 95511.73 Step B 48.2151 3857.21 8357.28 100287.41
Step C 50.6258 4050.06 8775.14 105301.66
Step D 53.1570 4252.56 9213.88 110566.56
Step E 55.8153 4465.22 9674.65 116095.82
Step F 58.6058 4688.46 10158.34 121900.06
Step G 61.5358 4922.86 10666.21 127994.46
1144A Recreation Supervisor-A Step A 38.0866 3046.93 6601.68 79220.13 Step B 39.9907 3199.26 6931.72 83180.66
Step C 41.9904 3359.23 7278.34 87340.03
Step D 44.0899 3527.19 7642.25 91706.99
Step E 46.2944 3703.55 8024.36 96292.35
Step F 48.6090 3888.72 8425.56 101106.72
Step G 51.0395 4083.16 8846.85 106162.16
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6231A Refuse Superintendent-A Step A 49.7828 3982.62 8629.02 103548.22 Step B 52.2720 4181.76 9060.48 108725.76
Step C 54.8856 4390.85 9513.50 114162.05
Step D 57.6300 4610.40 9989.20 119870.40
Step E 60.5113 4840.90 10488.63 125863.50
Step F 63.5370 5082.96 11013.08 132156.96
Step G 66.7137 5337.10 11563.71 138764.50
6235A Refuse Supervisor-A Step A 41.4857 3318.86 7190.85 86290.26 Step B 43.5600 3484.80 7550.40 90604.80
Step C 45.7381 3659.05 7927.94 95135.25
Step D 48.0242 3841.94 8324.19 99890.34
Step E 50.4252 4034.02 8740.37 104884.42
Step F 52.9464 4235.71 9177.38 110128.51
Step G 55.5939 4447.51 9636.28 115635.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6244A Refuse and Stormwater Manager-A Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.1917 5615.34 12166.56 145998.74
Step C 73.7007 5896.06 12774.79 153297.46
Step D 77.3861 6190.89 13413.59 160963.09
Step E 81.2552 6500.42 14084.23 169010.82
Step F 85.3178 6825.42 14788.42 177461.02
Step G 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
6450A Risk Manager-A Step A 59.5910 4767.28 10329.11 123949.28 Step B 62.5706 5005.65 10845.57 130146.85
Step C 65.6993 5255.94 11387.88 136654.54
Step D 68.9841 5518.73 11957.24 143486.93
Step E 72.4334 5794.67 12555.12 150661.47
Step F 76.0551 6084.41 13182.88 158194.61
Step G 79.8577 6388.62 13842.00 166104.02
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6500A Safety Coordinator-A Step A 41.7429 3339.43 7235.44 86825.23 Step B 43.8298 3506.38 7597.17 91165.98
Step C 46.0213 3681.70 7977.03 95724.30
Step D 48.3225 3865.80 8375.90 100510.80
Step E 50.7384 4059.07 8794.66 105535.87
Step F 53.2753 4262.02 9234.39 110812.62
Step G 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
7130A Senior Business Systems Analyst-A Step A 45.5054 3640.43 7887.60 94651.23 Step B 47.7808 3822.46 8282.01 99384.06
Step C 50.1697 4013.58 8696.08 104352.98
Step D 52.6782 4214.26 9130.89 109570.66
Step E 55.3122 4424.98 9587.45 115049.38
Step F 58.0777 4646.22 10066.80 120801.62
Step G 60.9817 4878.54 10570.16 126841.94
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7145A Senior Database Analyst-A Step A 45.5054 3640.43 7887.60 94651.23 Step B 47.7808 3822.46 8282.01 99384.06
Step C 50.1697 4013.58 8696.08 104352.98
Step D 52.6782 4214.26 9130.89 109570.66
Step E 55.3122 4424.98 9587.45 115049.38
Step F 58.0777 4646.22 10066.80 120801.62
Step G 60.9817 4878.54 10570.16 126841.94
7123A Senior Deputy City Attorney-A Step A 81.7948 6543.58 14177.77 170133.18 Step B 85.8846 6870.77 14886.66 178639.97
Step C 90.1789 7214.31 15631.01 187572.11
Step D 94.6878 7575.02 16412.55 196950.62
Step E 99.4223 7953.78 17233.20 206798.38
Step F 104.3931 8351.45 18094.80 217137.65
Step G 109.6129 8769.03 18999.57 227994.83
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1097A Senior Development Services
Business Analyst-A
Step A 45.5047 3640.38 7887.48 94649.78
Step B 47.7800 3822.40 8281.87 99382.40
Step C 50.1689 4013.51 8695.94 104351.31
Step D 52.6774 4214.19 9130.75 109568.99
Step E 55.3113 4424.90 9587.29 115047.50
Step F 58.0768 4646.14 10066.65 120799.74
Step G 60.9807 4878.46 10569.99 126839.86
7128A Senior Electric Business Analyst-A Step A 59.4219 4753.75 10299.80 123597.55 Step B 62.3929 4991.43 10814.77 129777.23
Step C 65.5127 5241.02 11355.53 136266.42
Step D 68.7881 5503.05 11923.27 143079.25
Step E 72.2275 5778.20 12519.43 150233.20
Step F 75.8390 6067.12 13145.43 157745.12
Step G 79.6311 6370.49 13802.72 165632.69
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1023A Senior Electric Technology Systems
Analyst-A
Step A 61.1103 4888.82 10592.45 127109.42
Step B 64.1657 5133.26 11122.05 133464.66
Step C 67.3741 5389.93 11678.18 140138.13
Step D 70.7428 5659.42 12262.09 147145.02
Step E 74.2799 5942.39 12875.18 154502.19
Step F 77.9939 6239.51 13518.94 162227.31
Step G 81.8936 6551.49 14194.89 170338.69
7163A Senior Energy Services Account
Representative-A
Step A 59.2013 4736.10 10261.56 123138.70
Step B 62.1615 4972.92 10774.66 129295.92
Step C 65.2695 5221.56 11313.38 135760.56
Step D 68.5330 5482.64 11879.05 142548.64
Step E 71.9597 5756.78 12473.01 149676.18
Step F 75.5577 6044.62 13096.67 157160.02
Step G 79.3355 6346.84 13751.49 165017.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7142A Senior Engineer-A Step A 52.8182 4225.46 9155.15 109861.86 Step B 55.4594 4436.75 9612.96 115355.55
Step C 58.2321 4658.57 10093.56 121122.77
Step D 61.1440 4891.52 10598.29 127179.52
Step E 64.2008 5136.06 11128.14 133537.66
Step F 67.4111 5392.89 11684.59 140215.09
Step G 70.7816 5662.53 12268.81 147225.73
1065A Senior Environmental Utilities
Business Analyst-A
Step A 48.2147 3857.18 8357.21 100286.58
Step B 50.6252 4050.02 8775.03 105300.42
Step C 53.1566 4252.53 9213.81 110565.73
Step D 55.8144 4465.15 9674.50 116093.95
Step E 58.6054 4688.43 10158.27 121899.23
Step F 61.5354 4922.83 10666.14 127993.63
Step G 64.6122 5168.98 11199.45 134393.38
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7161A Senior GIS Analyst-A Step A 45.3077 3624.62 7853.33 94240.02 Step B 47.5730 3805.84 8245.99 98951.84
Step C 49.9516 3996.13 8658.28 103899.33
Step D 52.4494 4195.95 9091.23 109094.75
Step E 55.0719 4405.75 9545.80 114549.55
Step F 57.8255 4626.04 10023.09 120277.04
Step G 60.7167 4857.34 10524.23 126290.74
7150A Senior Human Resources Analyst-A Step A 47.1066 3768.53 8165.14 97981.73 Step B 49.4617 3956.94 8573.36 102880.34
Step C 51.9349 4154.79 9002.05 108024.59
Step D 54.5315 4362.52 9452.13 113425.52
Step E 57.2582 4580.66 9924.75 119097.06
Step F 60.1211 4809.69 10420.99 125051.89
Step G 63.1270 5050.16 10942.01 131304.16
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7194A Senior Information Technology
Analyst-A
Step A 45.5054 3640.43 7887.60 94651.23
Step B 47.7808 3822.46 8282.01 99384.06
Step C 50.1697 4013.58 8696.08 104352.98
Step D 52.6782 4214.26 9130.89 109570.66
Step E 55.3122 4424.98 9587.45 115049.38
Step F 58.0777 4646.22 10066.80 120801.62
Step G 60.9817 4878.54 10570.16 126841.94
1119A Senior Park Development Project
Manager-A
Step A 45.9170 3673.36 7958.95 95507.36
Step B 48.2130 3857.04 8356.92 100283.04
Step C 50.6236 4049.89 8774.76 105297.09
Step D 53.1548 4252.38 9213.50 110561.98
Step E 55.8125 4465.00 9674.17 116090.00
Step F 58.6031 4688.25 10157.87 121894.45
Step G 61.5333 4922.66 10665.77 127989.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7180A Senior Planner-A Step A 48.1569 3852.55 8347.20 100166.35 Step B 50.5648 4045.18 8764.57 105174.78
Step C 53.0930 4247.44 9202.79 110433.44
Step D 55.7476 4459.81 9662.92 115955.01
Step E 58.5352 4682.82 10146.10 121753.22
Step F 61.4620 4916.96 10653.41 127840.96
Step G 64.5349 5162.79 11186.05 134232.59
7151A Senior Power Engineer-A Step A 75.0743 6005.94 13012.88 156154.54 Step B 78.8279 6306.23 13663.50 163962.03
Step C 82.7694 6621.55 14346.70 172160.35
Step D 86.9079 6952.63 15064.04 180768.43
Step E 91.2531 7300.25 15817.20 189806.45
Step F 95.8158 7665.26 16608.07 199296.86
Step G 100.6066 8048.53 17438.48 209261.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5555A Senior Power Plant Engineer-A Step A 75.0743 6005.94 13012.88 156154.54 Step B 78.8279 6306.23 13663.50 163962.03
Step C 82.7694 6621.55 14346.70 172160.35
Step D 86.9079 6952.63 15064.04 180768.43
Step E 91.2531 7300.25 15817.20 189806.45
Step F 95.8158 7665.26 16608.07 199296.86
Step G 100.6066 8048.53 17438.48 209261.73
1029A Senior Utility Billing Analyst-A Step A 46.0265 3682.12 7977.93 95735.12 Step B 48.3280 3866.24 8376.85 100522.24
Step C 50.7444 4059.55 8795.70 105548.35
Step D 53.2815 4262.52 9235.46 110825.52
Step E 55.9457 4475.66 9697.25 116367.06
Step F 58.7429 4699.43 10182.10 122185.23
Step G 61.6800 4934.40 10691.20 128294.40
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1073A Street Maintenance Manager-A Step A 59.4600 4756.80 10306.40 123676.80 Step B 62.4329 4994.63 10821.70 129860.43
Step C 65.5547 5244.38 11362.81 136353.78
Step D 68.8324 5506.59 11930.95 143171.39
Step E 72.2739 5781.91 12527.48 150329.71
Step F 75.8876 6071.01 13153.85 157846.21
Step G 79.6821 6374.57 13811.56 165738.77
7522A Street Maintenance Supervisor-A Step A 38.1973 3055.78 6620.87 79450.38 Step B 40.1072 3208.58 6951.91 83422.98
Step C 42.1125 3369.00 7299.50 87594.00
Step D 44.2182 3537.46 7664.49 91973.86
Step E 46.4291 3714.33 8047.71 96572.53
Step F 48.7506 3900.05 8450.10 101401.25
Step G 51.1880 4095.04 8872.59 106471.04
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1110A Transit Operations Supervisor-A Step A 45.9171 3673.37 7958.96 95507.57 Step B 48.2129 3857.03 8356.90 100282.83
Step C 50.6235 4049.88 8774.74 105296.88
Step D 53.1549 4252.39 9213.52 110562.19
Step E 55.8126 4465.01 9674.18 116090.21
Step F 58.6032 4688.26 10157.89 121894.66
Step G 61.5332 4922.66 10665.75 127989.06
8762A Urban Forester-A Step A 41.8236 3345.89 7249.42 86993.09 Step B 43.9145 3513.16 7611.85 91342.16
Step C 46.1104 3688.83 7992.47 95909.63
Step D 48.4159 3873.27 8392.09 100705.07
Step E 50.8368 4066.94 8811.71 105740.54
Step F 53.3784 4270.27 9252.26 111027.07
Step G 56.0473 4483.78 9714.87 116578.38
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1041A Utility Billing and Field Services
Supervisor-A
Step A 47.3681 3789.45 8210.47 98525.65
Step B 49.7365 3978.92 8620.99 103451.92
Step C 52.2232 4177.86 9052.02 108624.26
Step D 54.8343 4386.74 9504.61 114055.34
Step E 57.5761 4606.09 9979.86 119758.29
Step F 60.4550 4836.40 10478.87 125746.40
Step G 63.4777 5078.22 11002.80 132033.62
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1042A Utility Customer Service Supervisor-A Step A 34.0428 2723.42 5900.75 70809.02 Step B 35.7447 2859.58 6195.75 74348.98
Step C 37.5321 3002.57 6505.56 78066.77
Step D 39.4086 3152.69 6830.82 81969.89
Step E 41.3790 3310.32 7172.36 86068.32
Step F 43.4481 3475.85 7531.00 90372.05
Step G 45.6205 3649.64 7907.55 94890.64
1102A Utility Exploration Center SupervisorA Step A 39.7899 3183.19 6896.92 82762.99 Step B 41.7791 3342.33 7241.71 86900.53
Step C 43.8682 3509.46 7603.82 91245.86
Step D 46.0617 3684.94 7984.03 95808.34
Step E 48.3647 3869.18 8383.21 100598.58
Step F 50.7828 4062.62 8802.35 105628.22
Step G 53.3220 4265.76 9242.48 110909.76
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1646A Utility Government Relations
Administrator-A
Step A 50.0899 4007.19 8682.25 104186.99
Step B 52.5944 4207.55 9116.36 109396.35
Step C 55.2239 4417.91 9572.14 114865.71
Step D 57.9852 4638.82 10050.77 120609.22
Step E 60.8844 4870.75 10553.30 126639.55
Step F 63.9287 5114.30 11080.97 132971.70
Step G 67.1251 5370.01 11635.02 139620.21
8980A Wastewater Collection
Superintendent-A
Step A 49.7828 3982.62 8629.02 103548.22
Step B 52.2720 4181.76 9060.48 108725.76
Step C 54.8856 4390.85 9513.50 114162.05
Step D 57.6300 4610.40 9989.20 119870.40
Step E 60.5113 4840.90 10488.63 125863.50
Step F 63.5370 5082.96 11013.08 132156.96
Step G 66.7137 5337.10 11563.71 138764.50
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8978A Wastewater Collection Supervisor-A Step A 41.4841 3318.73 7190.58 86286.93 Step B 43.5579 3484.63 7550.04 90600.43
Step C 45.7360 3658.88 7927.57 95130.88
Step D 48.0228 3841.82 8323.95 99887.42
Step E 50.4240 4033.92 8740.16 104881.92
Step F 52.9449 4235.59 9177.12 110125.39
Step G 55.5922 4447.38 9635.98 115631.78
9040A Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-A
Step A 54.7564 4380.51 9491.11 113893.31
Step B 57.4944 4599.55 9965.70 119588.35
Step C 60.3688 4829.50 10463.93 125567.10
Step D 63.3876 5071.01 10987.18 131846.21
Step E 66.5567 5324.54 11536.49 138437.94
Step F 69.8845 5590.76 12113.31 145359.76
Step G 73.3786 5870.29 12718.96 152627.49
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9045A Wastewater Utility Manager-A Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.1917 5615.34 12166.56 145998.74
Step C 73.7007 5896.06 12774.79 153297.46
Step D 77.3861 6190.89 13413.59 160963.09
Step E 81.2552 6500.42 14084.23 169010.82
Step F 85.3178 6825.42 14788.42 177461.02
Step G 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
9047A Water Conservation Administrator-A Step A 45.6340 3650.72 7909.89 94918.72 Step B 47.9158 3833.26 8305.41 99664.86
Step C 50.3116 4024.93 8720.68 104648.13
Step D 52.8271 4226.17 9156.70 109880.37
Step E 55.4685 4437.48 9614.54 115374.48
Step F 58.2423 4659.38 10095.33 121143.98
Step G 61.1541 4892.33 10600.04 127200.53
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9085A Water Distribution Superintendent-A Step A 49.0486 3923.89 8501.76 102021.09 Step B 52.2720 4181.76 9060.48 108725.76
Step C 54.8856 4390.85 9513.50 114162.05
Step D 57.6300 4610.40 9989.20 119870.40
Step E 60.5113 4840.90 10488.63 125863.50
Step F 63.5370 5082.96 11013.08 132156.96
Step G 66.7137 5337.10 11563.71 138764.50
9084A Water Distribution Supervisor-A Step A 41.4840 3318.72 7190.56 86286.72 Step B 43.5579 3484.63 7550.04 90600.43
Step C 45.7360 3658.88 7927.57 95130.88
Step D 48.0228 3841.82 8323.95 99887.42
Step E 50.4239 4033.91 8740.14 104881.71
Step F 52.9449 4235.59 9177.12 110125.39
Step G 55.5922 4447.38 9635.98 115631.78
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9101A Water Quality Lab Supervisor-A Step A 43.5565 3484.52 7549.79 90597.52 Step B 45.7343 3658.74 7927.28 95127.34
Step C 48.0209 3841.67 8323.62 99883.47
Step D 50.4219 4033.75 8739.80 104877.55
Step E 52.9431 4235.45 9176.80 110121.65
Step F 55.5903 4447.22 9635.65 115627.82
Step G 58.3697 4669.58 10117.41 121408.98
9175A Water Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-A
Step A 49.7784 3982.27 8628.26 103539.07
Step B 52.2676 4181.41 9059.72 108716.61
Step C 54.8807 4390.46 9512.65 114151.86
Step D 57.6250 4610.00 9988.33 119860.00
Step E 60.5060 4840.48 10487.71 125852.48
Step F 63.5315 5082.52 11012.13 132145.52
Step G 66.7080 5336.64 11562.72 138752.64
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9244A Water Utility Manager-A Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.1917 5615.34 12166.56 145998.74
Step C 73.7007 5896.06 12774.79 153297.46
Step D 77.3861 6190.89 13413.59 160963.09
Step E 81.2552 6500.42 14084.23 169010.82
Step F 85.3178 6825.42 14788.42 177461.02
Step G 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1505B AMI Project Manager-B Step A 54.7228 4377.82 9485.29 113823.42 Step B 57.8903 4631.22 10034.32 120411.82
Step C 59.6271 4770.17 10335.36 124024.37
Step D 61.4159 4913.27 10645.42 127745.07
Step E 63.2584 5060.67 10964.79 131577.47
Step F 65.1562 5212.50 11293.74 135524.90
Step G 67.1108 5368.86 11632.54 139590.46
Step H 69.1242 5529.94 11981.53 143778.34
Step I 71.1979 5695.83 12340.97 148091.63
Step J 73.3338 5866.70 12711.19 152534.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1370B Accounting Manager-B Step A 62.8047 5024.38 10886.15 130633.78 Step B 66.4401 5315.21 11516.28 138195.41
Step C 68.4333 5474.66 11861.77 142341.26
Step D 70.4862 5638.90 12217.61 146611.30
Step E 72.6009 5808.07 12584.16 151009.87
Step F 74.7789 5982.31 12961.68 155540.11
Step G 77.0224 6161.79 13350.55 160206.59
Step H 79.3330 6346.64 13751.05 165012.64
Step I 81.7130 6537.04 14163.59 169963.04
Step J 84.1643 6733.14 14588.48 175061.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0043B Accounting Supervisor-B Step A 52.1047 4168.38 9031.48 108377.78 Step B 55.1209 4409.67 9554.29 114651.47
Step C 56.7744 4541.95 9840.90 118090.75
Step D 58.4777 4678.22 10136.13 121633.62
Step E 60.2321 4818.57 10440.23 125282.77
Step F 62.0390 4963.12 10753.43 129041.12
Step G 63.9001 5112.01 11076.02 132912.21
Step H 65.8172 5265.38 11408.31 136899.78
Step I 67.7917 5423.34 11750.56 141006.74
Step J 69.8254 5586.03 12103.07 145236.83
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9427B Accounts Payable Supervisor-B Step A 49.6233 3969.86 8601.37 103216.46 Step B 52.4956 4199.65 9099.24 109190.85
Step C 54.0705 4325.64 9372.22 112466.64
Step D 55.6926 4455.41 9653.38 115840.61
Step E 57.3634 4589.07 9942.99 119315.87
Step F 59.0843 4726.74 10241.28 122895.34
Step G 60.8568 4868.54 10548.51 126582.14
Step H 62.6825 5014.60 10864.97 130379.60
Step I 64.5630 5165.04 11190.92 134291.04
Step J 66.4999 5319.99 11526.65 138319.79
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0090B Alternative Transportation Manager-B Step A 63.7302 5098.42 11046.57 132558.82 Step B 67.4191 5393.53 11685.98 140231.73
Step C 69.4417 5555.34 12036.56 144438.74
Step D 71.5250 5722.00 12397.67 148772.00
Step E 73.6707 5893.66 12769.59 153235.06
Step F 75.8808 6070.46 13152.67 157832.06
Step G 78.1573 6252.58 13547.27 162567.18
Step H 80.5019 6440.15 13953.66 167443.95
Step I 82.9170 6633.36 14372.28 172467.36
Step J 85.4044 6832.35 14803.43 177641.15
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1017B Assistant Building Official-B Step A 48.1569 3852.55 8347.20 100166.35 Step B 50.9445 4075.56 8830.38 105964.56
Step C 52.4728 4197.82 9095.29 109143.42
Step D 54.0469 4323.75 9368.13 112417.55
Step E 55.6683 4453.46 9649.17 115790.06
Step F 57.3384 4587.07 9938.66 119263.87
Step G 59.0585 4724.68 10236.81 122841.68
Step H 60.8304 4866.43 10543.94 126527.23
Step I 62.6552 5012.42 10860.23 130322.82
Step J 64.5349 5162.79 11186.05 134232.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0245B Assistant City Attorney-B Step A 94.0641 7525.13 16304.44 195653.33 Step B 99.5089 7960.71 17248.21 206978.51
Step C 102.4941 8199.53 17765.64 213187.73
Step D 105.5690 8445.52 18298.63 219583.52
Step E 108.7361 8698.89 18847.59 226171.09
Step F 111.9981 8959.85 19413.00 232956.05
Step G 115.3580 9228.64 19995.39 239944.64
Step H 118.8188 9505.50 20595.26 247143.10
Step I 122.3833 9790.66 21213.11 254557.26
Step J 126.0548 10084.38 21849.50 262193.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0250B Assistant City Clerk-B Step A 48.0029 3840.23 8320.50 99846.03 Step B 50.7816 4062.53 8802.14 105625.73
Step C 52.3051 4184.41 9066.22 108794.61
Step D 53.8743 4309.94 9338.21 112058.54
Step E 55.4906 4439.25 9618.37 115420.45
Step F 57.1553 4572.42 9906.92 118883.02
Step G 58.8699 4709.59 10204.12 122449.39
Step H 60.6359 4850.87 10510.22 126122.67
Step I 62.4551 4996.41 10825.55 129906.61
Step J 64.3287 5146.30 11150.31 133803.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0325B Assistant City Manager-B Step A 94.9999 7599.99 16466.65 197599.79 Step B 100.4989 8039.91 17419.81 209037.71
Step C 103.5138 8281.10 17942.39 215308.70
Step D 106.6192 8529.54 18480.66 221767.94
Step E 109.8178 8785.42 19035.09 228421.02
Step F 113.1123 9048.98 19606.13 235273.58
Step G 116.5056 9320.45 20194.30 242331.65
Step H 120.0008 9600.06 20800.14 249601.66
Step I 123.6008 9888.06 21424.14 257089.66
Step J 127.3089 10184.71 22066.88 264802.51
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1021B Assistant City Manager/Chief
Financial Officer-B
Step A 94.9999 7599.99 16466.65 197599.79
Step B 100.4989 8039.91 17419.81 209037.71
Step C 103.5138 8281.10 17942.39 215308.70
Step D 106.6192 8529.54 18480.66 221767.94
Step E 109.8178 8785.42 19035.09 228421.02
Step F 113.1123 9048.98 19606.13 235273.58
Step G 116.5056 9320.45 20194.30 242331.65
Step H 120.0008 9600.06 20800.14 249601.66
Step I 123.6008 9888.06 21424.14 257089.66
Step J 127.3089 10184.71 22066.88 264802.51
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1068B Assistant Electric Analyst-B Step A 37.2034 2976.27 6448.59 77383.07 Step B 39.3570 3148.56 6821.88 81862.56
Step C 40.5377 3243.02 7026.53 84318.42
Step D 41.7537 3340.30 7237.31 86847.70
Step E 43.0065 3440.52 7454.46 89453.52
Step F 44.2965 3543.72 7678.06 92136.72
Step G 45.6255 3650.04 7908.42 94901.04
Step H 46.9943 3759.54 8145.68 97748.14
Step I 48.4041 3872.33 8390.04 100680.53
Step J 49.8562 3988.50 8641.74 103700.90
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0395B Assistant Electric Utility Director-B Step A 112.4490 8995.92 19491.16 233893.92 Step B 118.9582 9516.66 20619.42 247433.06
Step C 122.5270 9802.16 21238.01 254856.16
Step D 126.2027 10096.22 21875.13 262501.62
Step E 129.9889 10399.11 22531.41 270376.91
Step F 133.8885 10711.08 23207.34 278488.08
Step G 137.9051 11032.41 23903.55 286842.61
Step H 142.0423 11363.38 24620.67 295447.98
Step I 146.3035 11704.28 25359.27 304311.28
Step J 150.6927 12055.42 26120.07 313440.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0411B Assistant Environmental Utilities
Director-B
Step A 76.8725 6149.80 13324.57 159894.80
Step B 81.3223 6505.78 14095.87 169150.38
Step C 83.7618 6700.94 14518.71 174224.54
Step D 86.2747 6901.98 14954.28 179451.38
Step E 88.8630 7109.04 15402.92 184835.04
Step F 91.5289 7322.31 15865.01 190380.11
Step G 94.2747 7541.98 16340.95 196091.38
Step H 97.1029 7768.23 16831.17 201974.03
Step I 100.0161 8001.29 17336.12 208033.49
Step J 103.0165 8241.32 17856.19 214274.32
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1026B Assistant Finance Director-B Step A 72.2245 5777.96 12518.91 150226.96 Step B 76.4051 6112.41 13243.55 158922.61
Step C 78.6973 6295.78 13640.87 163690.38
Step D 81.0583 6484.66 14050.11 168601.26
Step E 83.4899 6679.19 14471.58 173658.99
Step F 85.9946 6879.57 14905.73 178868.77
Step G 88.5746 7085.97 15352.93 184235.17
Step H 91.2317 7298.54 15813.49 189761.94
Step I 93.9686 7517.49 16287.89 195454.69
Step J 96.7878 7743.02 16776.55 201318.62
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0480B Assistant Fire Chief-B Step A 74.4805 5958.44 12909.95 154919.44 Step B 78.7920 6303.36 13657.28 163887.36
Step C 81.1557 6492.46 14066.99 168803.86
Step D 83.5903 6687.22 14488.99 173867.82
Step E 86.0981 6887.85 14923.67 179084.05
Step F 88.6811 7094.49 15371.39 184456.69
Step G 91.3414 7307.31 15832.51 189990.11
Step H 94.0817 7526.54 16307.49 195689.94
Step I 96.9041 7752.33 16796.71 201560.53
Step J 99.8113 7984.90 17300.63 207607.50
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0484B Assistant Human Resources DirectorB Step A 65.1431 5211.45 11291.47 135497.65 Step B 68.9138 5513.10 11945.06 143340.70
Step C 70.9812 5678.50 12303.41 147640.90
Step D 73.1107 5848.86 12672.52 152070.26
Step E 75.3040 6024.32 13052.69 156632.32
Step F 77.5631 6205.05 13444.27 161331.25
Step G 79.8900 6391.20 13847.60 166171.20
Step H 82.2867 6582.94 14263.03 171156.34
Step I 84.7553 6780.42 14690.92 176291.02
Step J 87.2980 6983.84 15131.65 181579.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9558B Assistant Information Technology
Director-B
Step A 68.4017 5472.14 11856.29 142275.54
Step B 72.3611 5788.89 12542.59 150511.09
Step C 74.5319 5962.55 12918.86 155026.35
Step D 76.7679 6141.43 13306.44 159677.23
Step E 79.0710 6325.68 13705.64 164467.68
Step F 81.4429 6515.43 14116.77 169401.23
Step G 83.8863 6710.90 14540.29 174483.50
Step H 86.4029 6912.23 14976.50 179718.03
Step I 88.9950 7119.60 15425.80 185109.60
Step J 91.6649 7333.19 15888.58 190662.99
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0510B Assistant Police Chief-B Step A 86.6885 6935.08 15026.01 180312.08 Step B 91.7064 7336.51 15895.78 190749.31
Step C 94.4576 7556.61 16372.65 196471.81
Step D 97.2914 7783.31 16863.84 202366.11
Step E 100.2100 8016.80 17369.73 208436.80
Step F 103.2163 8257.30 17890.83 214689.90
Step G 106.3128 8505.02 18427.55 221130.62
Step H 109.5022 8760.18 18980.38 227764.58
Step I 112.7872 9022.98 19549.78 234597.38
Step J 116.1709 9293.67 20136.29 241635.47
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1148B Assistant Public Works Director-B Step A 71.2520 5700.16 12350.35 148204.16 Step B 75.3764 6030.11 13065.24 156782.91
Step C 77.6377 6211.02 13457.20 161486.42
Step D 79.9668 6397.34 13860.91 166330.94
Step E 82.3658 6589.26 14276.74 171320.86
Step F 84.8368 6786.94 14705.05 176460.54
Step G 87.3819 6990.55 15146.20 181754.35
Step H 90.0033 7200.26 15600.57 187206.86
Step I 92.7034 7416.27 16068.59 192823.07
Step J 95.4845 7638.76 16550.65 198607.76
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0086B Assistant Transportation Planner-B Step A 37.9473 3035.78 6577.53 78930.38 Step B 40.1439 3211.51 6958.28 83499.31
Step C 41.3483 3307.86 7167.04 86004.46
Step D 42.5888 3407.10 7382.06 88584.70
Step E 43.8663 3509.30 7603.49 91241.90
Step F 45.1823 3614.58 7831.60 93979.18
Step G 46.5378 3723.02 8066.55 96798.62
Step H 47.9340 3834.72 8308.56 99702.72
Step I 49.3720 3949.76 8557.81 102693.76
Step J 50.8531 4068.25 8814.54 105774.45
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1067B Associate Electric Analyst-B Step A 40.9237 3273.90 7093.44 85121.30 Step B 43.2927 3463.42 7504.07 90048.82
Step C 44.5914 3567.31 7729.18 92750.11
Step D 45.9292 3674.34 7961.06 95532.74
Step E 47.3070 3784.56 8199.88 98398.56
Step F 48.7262 3898.10 8445.87 101350.50
Step G 50.1880 4015.04 8699.25 104391.04
Step H 51.6937 4135.50 8960.24 107522.90
Step I 53.2445 4259.56 9229.05 110748.56
Step J 54.8418 4387.34 9505.91 114070.94
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0088B Associate Transportation Planner-B Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0910B Budget Analyst I-B Step A 39.8435 3187.48 6906.21 82874.48 Step B 42.1498 3371.98 7305.97 87671.58
Step C 43.4143 3473.14 7525.15 90301.74
Step D 44.7167 3577.34 7750.89 93010.74
Step E 46.0582 3684.66 7983.42 95801.06
Step F 47.4400 3795.20 8222.93 98675.20
Step G 48.8632 3909.06 8469.62 101635.46
Step H 50.3291 4026.33 8723.71 104684.53
Step I 51.8390 4147.12 8985.43 107825.12
Step J 53.3941 4271.53 9254.98 111059.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0915B Budget Analyst II-B Step A 43.8288 3506.30 7596.99 91163.90 Step B 46.3659 3709.27 8036.76 96441.07
Step C 47.7568 3820.54 8277.85 99334.14
Step D 49.1895 3935.16 8526.18 102314.16
Step E 50.6652 4053.22 8781.97 105383.62
Step F 52.1852 4174.82 9045.43 108545.22
Step G 53.7507 4300.06 9316.79 111801.46
Step H 55.3633 4429.06 9596.31 115155.66
Step I 57.0241 4561.93 9884.18 118610.13
Step J 58.7349 4698.79 10180.72 122168.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0930B Budget Manager-B Step A 62.8047 5024.38 10886.15 130633.78 Step B 66.4401 5315.21 11516.28 138195.41
Step C 68.4333 5474.66 11861.77 142341.26
Step D 70.4862 5638.90 12217.61 146611.30
Step E 72.6009 5808.07 12584.16 151009.87
Step F 74.7789 5982.31 12961.68 155540.11
Step G 77.0224 6161.79 13350.55 160206.59
Step H 79.3330 6346.64 13751.05 165012.64
Step I 81.7130 6537.04 14163.59 169963.04
Step J 84.1643 6733.14 14588.48 175061.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1043B Building Official-B Step A 63.1961 5055.69 10953.99 131447.89 Step B 66.8540 5348.32 11588.03 139056.32
Step C 68.8596 5508.77 11935.66 143227.97
Step D 70.9253 5674.02 12293.72 147524.62
Step E 73.0531 5844.25 12662.54 151950.45
Step F 75.2447 6019.58 13042.41 156508.98
Step G 77.5020 6200.16 13433.68 161204.16
Step H 79.8271 6386.17 13836.70 166040.37
Step I 82.2220 6577.76 14251.81 171021.76
Step J 84.6886 6775.09 14679.36 176152.29
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1141B Building Plans Examiner SupervsiorB Step A 47.2133 3777.06 8183.64 98203.66 Step B 49.9462 3995.70 8657.34 103888.10
Step C 51.4446 4115.57 8917.06 107004.77
Step D 52.9879 4239.03 9184.57 110214.83
Step E 54.5776 4366.21 9460.12 113521.41
Step F 56.2149 4497.19 9743.92 116926.99
Step G 57.9013 4632.10 10036.23 120434.70
Step H 59.6384 4771.07 10337.32 124047.87
Step I 61.4275 4914.20 10647.43 127769.20
Step J 63.2703 5061.62 10966.85 131602.22
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1180B Chief Information Officer-B Step A 85.5023 6840.18 14820.40 177844.78 Step B 90.4515 7236.12 15678.26 188139.12
Step C 93.1650 7453.20 16148.60 193783.20
Step D 95.9600 7676.80 16633.07 199596.80
Step E 98.8389 7907.11 17132.08 205584.91
Step F 101.8040 8144.32 17646.03 211752.32
Step G 104.8581 8388.65 18175.40 218104.85
Step H 108.0039 8640.31 18720.68 224648.11
Step I 111.2439 8899.51 19282.28 231387.31
Step J 114.5814 9166.51 19860.78 238329.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1220B City Clerk-B Step A 70.6620 5652.96 12248.08 146976.96 Step B 74.7522 5980.18 12957.05 155484.58
Step C 76.9948 6159.58 13345.77 160149.18
Step D 79.3047 6344.38 13746.15 164953.78
Step E 81.6838 6534.70 14158.53 169902.30
Step F 84.1343 6730.74 14583.28 174999.34
Step G 86.6583 6932.66 15020.77 180249.26
Step H 89.2581 7140.65 15471.40 185656.85
Step I 91.9358 7354.86 15935.54 191226.46
Step J 94.6939 7575.51 16413.61 196963.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1142B City Librarian-B Step A 52.8062 4224.50 9153.07 109836.90 Step B 55.8634 4469.07 9682.99 116195.87
Step C 57.5395 4603.16 9973.51 119682.16
Step D 59.2656 4741.25 10272.70 123272.45
Step E 61.0435 4883.48 10580.87 126970.48
Step F 62.8749 5029.99 10898.32 130779.79
Step G 64.7610 5180.88 11225.24 134702.88
Step H 66.7039 5336.31 11562.01 138744.11
Step I 68.7051 5496.41 11908.88 142906.61
Step J 70.7662 5661.30 12266.14 147193.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1368B Code Enforcement Supervisor-B Step A 43.7167 3497.34 7577.56 90930.74 Step B 46.2472 3699.78 8016.18 96194.18
Step C 47.6347 3810.78 8256.68 99080.18
Step D 49.0638 3925.10 8504.39 102052.70
Step E 50.5356 4042.85 8759.50 105114.05
Step F 52.0517 4164.14 9022.29 108267.54
Step G 53.6133 4289.06 9292.97 111515.66
Step H 55.2218 4417.74 9571.78 114861.34
Step I 56.8783 4550.26 9858.91 118306.86
Step J 58.5847 4686.78 10154.68 121856.18
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1027B Construction Inspection
Superintendent-B
Step A 49.1955 3935.64 8527.22 102326.64
Step B 52.0433 4163.46 9020.84 108250.06
Step C 53.6046 4288.37 9291.46 111497.57
Step D 55.2128 4417.02 9570.22 114842.62
Step E 56.8691 4549.53 9857.31 118287.73
Step F 58.5752 4686.02 10153.03 121836.42
Step G 60.3324 4826.59 10457.62 125491.39
Step H 62.1425 4971.40 10771.37 129256.40
Step I 64.0068 5120.54 11094.51 133134.14
Step J 65.9269 5274.15 11427.33 137127.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3740B Cultural Arts Supervisor-B Step A 39.7899 3183.19 6896.92 82762.99 Step B 42.0925 3367.40 7296.03 87552.40
Step C 43.3553 3468.42 7514.92 90179.02
Step D 44.6559 3572.47 7740.36 92884.27
Step E 45.9957 3679.66 7972.59 95671.06
Step F 47.3755 3790.04 8211.75 98541.04
Step G 48.7968 3903.74 8458.11 101497.34
Step H 50.2606 4020.85 8711.84 104542.05
Step I 51.7685 4141.48 8973.21 107678.48
Step J 53.3220 4265.76 9242.48 110909.76
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1025B Custodian Supervisor-B Step A 26.8003 2144.02 4645.39 55744.62 Step B 28.3516 2268.13 4914.28 58971.33
Step C 29.2021 2336.17 5061.70 60740.37
Step D 30.0782 2406.26 5213.55 62562.66
Step E 30.9805 2478.44 5369.95 64439.44
Step F 31.9099 2552.79 5531.05 66372.59
Step G 32.8672 2629.38 5696.98 68363.78
Step H 33.8532 2708.26 5867.89 70414.66
Step I 34.8688 2789.50 6043.93 72527.10
Step J 35.9149 2873.19 6225.25 74702.99
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1150B Customer Care Manager-B Step A 54.4742 4357.94 9442.19 113306.34 Step B 57.6274 4610.19 9988.75 119864.99
Step C 59.3562 4748.50 10288.41 123460.90
Step D 61.1369 4890.95 10597.06 127164.75
Step E 62.9710 5037.68 10914.97 130979.68
Step F 64.8602 5188.82 11242.43 134909.22
Step G 66.8060 5344.48 11579.71 138956.48
Step H 68.8101 5504.81 11927.08 143125.01
Step I 70.8744 5669.95 12284.90 147418.75
Step J 73.0007 5840.06 12653.45 151841.46
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9561B Data Management System
Administrator-B
Step A 56.6346 4530.77 9816.66 117799.97
Step B 59.9129 4793.03 10384.90 124618.83
Step C 61.7103 4936.82 10696.45 128357.42
Step D 63.5617 5084.94 11017.36 132208.34
Step E 65.4684 5237.47 11347.86 136174.27
Step F 67.4325 5394.60 11688.30 140259.60
Step G 69.4556 5556.45 12038.97 144467.65
Step H 71.5391 5723.13 12400.11 148801.33
Step I 73.6854 5894.83 12772.14 153265.63
Step J 75.8960 6071.68 13155.31 157863.68
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1645B Department Public Information
Officer-B
Step A 49.5024 3960.19 8580.42 102964.99
Step B 52.3679 4189.43 9077.10 108925.23
Step C 53.9389 4315.11 9349.41 112192.91
Step D 55.5572 4444.58 9629.91 115558.98
Step E 57.2238 4577.90 9918.79 119025.50
Step F 58.9406 4715.25 10216.37 122596.45
Step G 60.7088 4856.70 10522.86 126274.30
Step H 62.5301 5002.41 10838.55 130062.61
Step I 64.4060 5152.48 11163.71 133964.48
Step J 66.3381 5307.05 11498.60 137983.25
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1655B Deputy City Attorney I-B Step A 67.5992 5407.94 11717.19 140606.34 Step B 71.5120 5720.96 12395.41 148744.96
Step C 73.6573 5892.58 12767.27 153207.18
Step D 75.8671 6069.37 13150.30 157803.57
Step E 78.1430 6251.44 13544.79 162537.44
Step F 80.4874 6438.99 13951.15 167413.79
Step G 82.9021 6632.17 14369.70 172436.37
Step H 85.3890 6831.12 14800.76 177609.12
Step I 87.9507 7036.06 15244.79 182937.46
Step J 90.5893 7247.14 15702.15 188425.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1658B Deputy City Attorney II-B Step A 74.3591 5948.73 12888.91 154666.93 Step B 78.6632 6293.06 13634.95 163619.46
Step C 81.0231 6481.85 14044.00 168528.05
Step D 83.4538 6676.30 14465.33 173583.90
Step E 85.9574 6876.59 14899.28 178791.39
Step F 88.5362 7082.90 15346.27 184155.30
Step G 91.1921 7295.37 15806.63 189679.57
Step H 93.9280 7514.24 16280.85 195370.24
Step I 96.7458 7739.66 16769.27 201231.26
Step J 99.6483 7971.86 17272.37 207268.46
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1659B Deputy City Manager-B Step A 77.7283 6218.26 13472.91 161674.86 Step B 82.2275 6578.20 14252.77 171033.20
Step C 84.6944 6775.55 14680.36 176164.35
Step D 87.2351 6978.81 15120.75 181449.01
Step E 89.8522 7188.18 15574.38 186892.58
Step F 92.5477 7403.82 16041.60 192499.22
Step G 95.3242 7625.94 16522.86 198274.34
Step H 98.1840 7854.72 17018.56 204222.72
Step I 101.1295 8090.36 17529.11 210349.36
Step J 104.1633 8333.06 18054.97 216659.66
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1280B Development Services AdministratorB Step A 52.2948 4183.58 9064.43 108773.18 Step B 55.3219 4425.75 9589.13 115069.55
Step C 56.9814 4558.51 9876.78 118521.31
Step D 58.6908 4695.26 10173.07 122076.86
Step E 60.4516 4836.13 10478.28 125739.33
Step F 62.2652 4981.22 10792.63 129511.62
Step G 64.1331 5130.65 11116.40 133396.85
Step H 66.0571 5284.57 11449.90 137398.77
Step I 68.0387 5443.10 11793.37 141520.50
Step J 70.0799 5606.39 12147.18 145766.19
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1676B Development Services Director-B Step A 85.5025 6840.20 14820.43 177845.20 Step B 90.4516 7236.13 15678.28 188139.33
Step C 93.1652 7453.22 16148.63 193783.62
Step D 95.9602 7676.82 16633.10 199597.22
Step E 98.8390 7907.12 17132.09 205585.12
Step F 101.8041 8144.33 17646.04 211752.53
Step G 104.8582 8388.66 18175.42 218105.06
Step H 108.0039 8640.31 18720.68 224648.11
Step I 111.2441 8899.53 19282.31 231387.73
Step J 114.5814 9166.51 19860.78 238329.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1695B Development Services Manager-B Step A 62.2290 4978.32 10786.36 129436.32 Step B 65.8312 5266.50 11410.74 136928.90
Step C 67.8061 5424.49 11753.06 141036.69
Step D 69.8402 5587.22 12105.63 145267.62
Step E 71.9355 5754.84 12468.82 149625.84
Step F 74.0935 5927.48 12842.87 154114.48
Step G 76.3164 6105.31 13228.18 158738.11
Step H 78.6059 6288.47 13625.02 163500.27
Step I 80.9640 6477.12 14033.76 168405.12
Step J 83.3930 6671.44 14454.79 173457.44
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2415B EMS Quality Assurance CoordinatorB Step A 55.5366 4442.93 9626.34 115516.13 Step B 58.7513 4700.10 10183.56 122202.70
Step C 60.5139 4841.11 10489.08 125868.91
Step D 62.3293 4986.34 10803.75 129644.94
Step E 64.1991 5135.93 11127.84 133534.13
Step F 66.1251 5290.01 11461.68 137540.21
Step G 68.1090 5448.72 11805.56 141666.72
Step H 70.1522 5612.18 12159.71 145916.58
Step I 72.2568 5780.54 12524.51 150294.14
Step J 74.4244 5953.95 12900.23 154802.75
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6520B ERP Program Manager-B Step A 54.7230 4377.84 9485.32 113823.84 Step B 57.8904 4631.23 10034.34 120412.03
Step C 59.6271 4770.17 10335.36 124024.37
Step D 61.4158 4913.26 10645.41 127744.86
Step E 63.2583 5060.66 10964.77 131577.26
Step F 65.1561 5212.49 11293.72 135524.69
Step G 67.1108 5368.86 11632.54 139590.46
Step H 69.1241 5529.93 11981.51 143778.13
Step I 71.1978 5695.82 12340.95 148091.42
Step J 73.3338 5866.70 12711.19 152534.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1674B Economic Development Analyst I-B Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 40.1445 3211.56 6958.38 83500.56
Step C 41.3490 3307.92 7167.16 86005.92
Step D 42.5894 3407.15 7382.16 88585.95
Step E 43.8670 3509.36 7603.61 91243.36
Step F 45.1830 3614.64 7831.72 93980.64
Step G 46.5386 3723.09 8066.69 96800.29
Step H 47.9347 3834.78 8308.68 99704.18
Step I 49.3728 3949.82 8557.95 102695.42
Step J 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1675B Economic Development Analyst II-B Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1710B Economic Development Director-B Step A 81.4337 6514.70 14115.17 169382.10 Step B 86.1476 6891.81 14932.25 179187.01
Step C 88.7321 7098.57 15380.23 184562.77
Step D 91.3941 7311.53 15841.64 190099.73
Step E 94.1358 7530.86 16316.87 195802.46
Step F 96.9599 7756.79 16806.38 201676.59
Step G 99.8687 7989.50 17310.57 207726.90
Step H 102.8647 8229.18 17829.88 213958.58
Step I 105.9507 8476.06 18364.79 220377.46
Step J 109.1292 8730.34 18915.73 226988.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1118B Economic Development Manager-B Step A 56.4726 4517.81 9788.58 117463.01 Step B 59.7438 4779.50 10355.59 124267.10
Step C 61.5360 4922.88 10666.24 127994.88
Step D 63.3821 5070.57 10986.23 131834.77
Step E 65.2836 5222.69 11315.82 135789.89
Step F 67.2420 5379.36 11655.28 139863.36
Step G 69.2593 5540.74 12004.95 144059.34
Step H 71.3370 5706.96 12365.08 148380.96
Step I 73.4773 5878.18 12736.07 152832.78
Step J 75.6814 6054.51 13118.11 157417.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1001B Economic Development Project
Manager-B
Step A 52.3696 4189.57 9077.40 108928.77
Step B 55.4009 4432.07 9602.82 115233.87
Step C 57.0629 4565.03 9890.90 118690.83
Step D 58.7748 4701.98 10187.63 122251.58
Step E 60.5380 4843.04 10493.25 125919.04
Step F 62.3541 4988.33 10808.04 129696.53
Step G 64.2248 5137.98 11132.30 133587.58
Step H 66.1515 5292.12 11466.26 137595.12
Step I 68.1361 5450.89 11810.26 141723.09
Step J 70.1802 5614.42 12164.57 145974.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1310B Electric Business Analyst I-B Step A 49.1088 3928.70 8512.19 102146.30 Step B 51.9514 4156.11 9004.91 108058.91
Step C 53.5100 4280.80 9275.07 111300.80
Step D 55.1154 4409.23 9553.34 114640.03
Step E 56.7688 4541.50 9839.93 118079.10
Step F 58.4719 4677.75 10135.13 121621.55
Step G 60.2260 4818.08 10439.17 125270.08
Step H 62.0327 4962.62 10752.33 129028.02
Step I 63.8937 5111.50 11074.91 132898.90
Step J 65.8106 5264.85 11407.17 136886.05
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1312B Electric Business Analyst II-B Step A 54.0194 4321.55 9363.36 112360.35 Step B 57.1461 4571.69 9905.32 118863.89
Step C 58.8606 4708.85 10202.50 122430.05
Step D 60.6264 4850.11 10508.58 126102.91
Step E 62.4452 4995.62 10823.83 129886.02
Step F 64.3186 5145.49 11148.56 133782.69
Step G 66.2481 5299.85 11483.00 137796.05
Step H 68.2355 5458.84 11827.49 141929.84
Step I 70.2826 5622.61 12182.32 146187.81
Step J 72.3911 5791.29 12547.79 150573.49
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1066B Electric Compliance Analyst I-B Step A 49.1085 3928.68 8512.14 102145.68 Step B 51.9511 4156.09 9004.86 108058.29
Step C 53.5097 4280.78 9275.01 111300.18
Step D 55.1149 4409.19 9553.25 114638.99
Step E 56.7684 4541.47 9839.86 118078.27
Step F 58.4715 4677.72 10135.06 121620.72
Step G 60.2255 4818.04 10439.09 125269.04
Step H 62.0324 4962.59 10752.28 129027.39
Step I 63.8934 5111.47 11074.86 132898.27
Step J 65.8102 5264.82 11407.10 136885.22
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2335B Electric Compliance Analyst II-B Step A 54.0202 4321.62 9363.50 112362.02 Step B 57.1472 4571.78 9905.51 118866.18
Step C 58.8615 4708.92 10202.66 122431.92
Step D 60.6274 4850.19 10508.75 126104.99
Step E 62.4462 4995.70 10824.01 129888.10
Step F 64.3196 5145.57 11148.73 133784.77
Step G 66.2492 5299.94 11483.19 137798.34
Step H 68.2366 5458.93 11827.68 141932.13
Step I 70.2837 5622.70 12182.51 146190.10
Step J 72.3923 5791.38 12548.00 150575.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual Step A 68.3352 5466.82 11844.77 142137.22
Step B 72.2907 5783.26 12530.39 150364.66
Step C 74.4595 5956.76 12906.31 154875.76
Step D 76.6933 6135.46 13293.51 159522.06
Step E 78.9941 6319.53 13692.31 164307.73
Step F 81.3639 6509.11 14103.08 169236.91
Step G 83.8049 6704.39 14526.18 174314.19
Step H 86.3189 6905.51 14961.94 179543.31
Step I 88.9085 7112.68 15410.81 184929.68
Step J 91.5758 7326.06 15873.14 190477.66
1151B Electric Customer Programs and
Public Affairs Supervisor-B
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1117B Electric Economic and Development
Partnership Manager-B
Step A 75.1688 6013.50 13029.26 156351.10
Step B 79.5198 6361.58 13783.43 165401.18
Step C 81.9054 6552.43 14196.94 170363.23
Step D 84.3625 6749.00 14622.83 175474.00
Step E 86.8934 6951.47 15061.52 180738.27
Step F 89.5003 7160.02 15513.39 186160.62
Step G 92.1852 7374.82 15978.77 191745.22
Step H 94.9509 7596.07 16458.16 197497.87
Step I 97.7994 7823.95 16951.90 203422.75
Step J 100.7333 8058.66 17460.44 209525.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2284B Electric Engineering Technician
Supervisor-B
Step A 63.9585 5116.68 11086.14 133033.68
Step B 67.6605 5412.84 11727.82 140733.84
Step C 69.6904 5575.23 12079.67 144956.03
Step D 71.7811 5742.49 12442.06 149304.69
Step E 73.9346 5914.77 12815.33 153783.97
Step F 76.1525 6092.20 13199.77 158397.20
Step G 78.4372 6274.98 13595.78 163149.38
Step H 80.7903 6463.22 14003.65 168043.82
Step I 83.2139 6657.11 14423.74 173084.91
Step J 85.7104 6856.83 14856.47 178277.63
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2338B Electric Operations Manager-B Step A 97.7818 7822.54 16948.85 203386.14 Step B 103.4418 8275.34 17929.91 215158.94
Step C 106.5450 8523.60 18467.80 221613.60
Step D 109.7414 8779.31 19021.84 228262.11
Step E 113.0336 9042.69 19592.49 235109.89
Step F 116.4246 9313.97 20180.26 242163.17
Step G 119.9173 9593.38 20785.67 249427.98
Step H 123.5148 9881.18 21409.23 256910.78
Step I 127.2203 10177.62 22051.52 264618.22
Step J 131.0368 10482.94 22713.05 272556.54
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2339B Electric Operations Supervisor-B Step A 88.8965 7111.72 15408.73 184904.72 Step B 94.0422 7523.38 16300.65 195607.78
Step C 96.8634 7749.07 16789.66 201475.87
Step D 99.7693 7981.54 17293.35 207520.14
Step E 102.7624 8220.99 17812.15 213745.79
Step F 105.8453 8467.62 18346.52 220158.22
Step G 109.0207 8721.66 18896.92 226763.06
Step H 112.2913 8983.30 19463.83 233565.90
Step I 115.6601 9252.81 20047.75 240573.01
Step J 119.1298 9530.38 20649.17 247789.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2314B Electric Resources Planner I-B Step A 56.7179 4537.43 9831.10 117973.23 Step B 60.0010 4800.08 10400.17 124802.08
Step C 61.8011 4944.09 10712.19 128546.29
Step D 63.6550 5092.40 11033.53 132402.40
Step E 65.5648 5245.18 11364.57 136374.78
Step F 67.5317 5402.54 11705.49 140465.94
Step G 69.5577 5564.62 12056.67 144680.02
Step H 71.6445 5731.56 12418.38 149020.56
Step I 73.7937 5903.50 12790.91 153490.90
Step J 76.0075 6080.60 13174.63 158095.60
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2316B Electric Resources Planner II-B Step A 62.3896 4991.17 10814.20 129770.37 Step B 66.0012 5280.10 11440.21 137282.50
Step C 67.9812 5438.50 11783.41 141400.90
Step D 70.0206 5601.65 12136.90 145642.85
Step E 72.1213 5769.70 12501.03 150012.30
Step F 74.2849 5942.79 12876.05 154512.59
Step G 76.5134 6121.07 13262.32 159147.87
Step H 78.8089 6304.71 13660.21 163922.51
Step I 81.1730 6493.84 14069.99 168839.84
Step J 83.6083 6688.66 14492.11 173905.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2216B Electric Risk and Compliance
Supervisor-B
Step A 68.3314 5466.51 11844.11 142129.31
Step B 72.2867 5782.94 12529.69 150356.34
Step C 74.4552 5956.42 12905.57 154866.82
Step D 76.6888 6135.10 13292.73 159512.70
Step E 78.9896 6319.17 13691.53 164298.37
Step F 81.3593 6508.74 14102.28 169227.34
Step G 83.8000 6704.00 14525.33 174304.00
Step H 86.3140 6905.12 14961.09 179533.12
Step I 88.9034 7112.27 15409.92 184919.07
Step J 91.5705 7325.64 15872.22 190466.64
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2352B Electric Safety Coordinator-B Step A 41.7429 3339.43 7235.44 86825.23 Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2319B Electric Substation Supervisor-B Step A 88.8965 7111.72 15408.73 184904.72 Step B 94.0422 7523.38 16300.65 195607.78
Step C 96.8634 7749.07 16789.66 201475.87
Step D 99.7693 7981.54 17293.35 207520.14
Step E 102.7624 8220.99 17812.15 213745.79
Step F 105.8453 8467.62 18346.52 220158.22
Step G 109.0207 8721.66 18896.92 226763.06
Step H 112.2913 8983.30 19463.83 233565.90
Step I 115.6601 9252.81 20047.75 240573.01
Step J 119.1298 9530.38 20649.17 247789.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9560B Electric Technology Systems
Administrator-B
Step A 68.3353 5466.82 11844.79 142137.42
Step B 72.2907 5783.26 12530.39 150364.66
Step C 74.4595 5956.76 12906.31 154875.76
Step D 76.6933 6135.46 13293.51 159522.06
Step E 78.9941 6319.53 13692.31 164307.73
Step F 81.3639 6509.11 14103.08 169236.91
Step G 83.8049 6704.39 14526.18 174314.19
Step H 86.3189 6905.51 14961.94 179543.31
Step I 88.9085 7112.68 15410.81 184929.68
Step J 91.5758 7326.06 15873.14 190477.66
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1116B Electric Utility Chief Operating
Officer-B
Step A 123.6941 9895.53 21440.31 257283.73
Step B 130.8540 10468.32 22681.36 272176.32
Step C 134.7797 10782.38 23361.81 280341.78
Step D 138.8231 11105.85 24062.67 288752.05
Step E 142.9878 11439.02 24784.55 297414.62
Step F 147.2774 11782.19 25528.08 306336.99
Step G 151.6957 12135.66 26293.92 315527.06
Step H 156.2466 12499.73 27082.74 324992.93
Step I 160.9340 12874.72 27895.23 334742.72
Step J 165.7620 13260.96 28732.08 344784.96
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2320B Electric Utility Director-B Step A 140.5631 11245.05 24364.27 292371.25 Step B 148.6995 11895.96 25774.58 309294.96
Step C 153.1606 12252.85 26547.84 318574.05
Step D 157.7554 12620.43 27344.27 328131.23
Step E 162.4879 12999.03 28164.57 337974.83
Step F 167.3627 13389.02 29009.53 348114.42
Step G 172.3834 13790.67 29879.79 358557.47
Step H 177.5550 14204.40 30776.20 369314.40
Step I 182.8816 14630.53 31699.48 380393.73
Step J 188.3681 15069.45 32650.47 391805.65
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2215B Electric Utility Financial AdministratorB Step A 68.3348 5466.78 11844.70 142136.38 Step B 72.2903 5783.22 12530.32 150363.82
Step C 74.4591 5956.73 12906.24 154874.93
Step D 76.6928 6135.42 13293.42 159521.02
Step E 78.9937 6319.50 13692.24 164306.90
Step F 81.3634 6509.07 14102.99 169235.87
Step G 83.8043 6704.34 14526.08 174312.94
Step H 86.3184 6905.47 14961.86 179542.27
Step I 88.9079 7112.63 15410.70 184928.43
Step J 91.5752 7326.02 15873.03 190476.42
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2378B Electronic Maintenance CoordinatorB Step A 46.0454 3683.63 7981.20 95774.43 Step B 48.7097 3896.78 8443.01 101316.18
Step C 50.1710 4013.68 8696.31 104355.68
Step D 51.6761 4134.09 8957.19 107486.29
Step E 53.2263 4258.10 9225.89 110710.70
Step F 54.8231 4385.85 9502.67 114032.05
Step G 56.4679 4517.43 9787.77 117453.23
Step H 58.1620 4652.96 10081.41 120976.96
Step I 59.9068 4792.54 10383.85 124606.14
Step J 61.7051 4936.41 10695.55 128346.61
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2500B Energy Services Account
Representative I-B
Step A 48.9290 3914.32 8481.03 101772.32
Step B 51.7612 4140.90 8971.94 107663.30
Step C 53.3140 4265.12 9241.09 110893.12
Step D 54.9134 4393.07 9518.32 114219.87
Step E 56.5608 4524.86 9803.87 117646.46
Step F 58.2577 4660.62 10098.00 121176.02
Step G 60.0054 4800.43 10400.94 124811.23
Step H 61.8056 4944.45 10712.97 128555.65
Step I 63.6597 5092.78 11034.35 132412.18
Step J 65.5695 5245.56 11365.38 136384.56
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2501B Energy Services Account
Representative II-B
Step A 53.8220 4305.76 9329.15 111949.76
Step B 56.9375 4555.00 9869.17 118430.00
Step C 58.6456 4691.65 10165.24 121982.85
Step D 60.4050 4832.40 10470.20 125642.40
Step E 62.2171 4977.37 10784.30 129411.57
Step F 64.0837 5126.70 11107.84 133294.10
Step G 66.0061 5280.49 11441.06 137292.69
Step H 67.9864 5438.91 11784.31 141411.71
Step I 70.0259 5602.07 12137.82 145653.87
Step J 72.1267 5770.14 12501.96 150023.54
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1277B Engineering Manager-B Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.7182 5657.46 12257.82 147093.86
Step C 72.8398 5827.18 12625.57 151506.78
Step D 75.0251 6002.01 13004.35 156052.21
Step E 77.2759 6182.07 13394.49 160733.87
Step F 79.5942 6367.54 13796.33 165555.94
Step G 81.9819 6558.55 14210.20 170522.35
Step H 84.4414 6755.31 14636.51 175638.11
Step I 86.9746 6957.97 15075.60 180907.17
Step J 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2540B Environmental Coordinator-B Step A 48.0045 3840.36 8320.78 99849.36 Step B 50.7831 4062.65 8802.40 105628.85
Step C 52.3067 4184.54 9066.49 108797.94
Step D 53.8759 4310.07 9338.49 112061.87
Step E 55.4922 4439.38 9618.65 115423.78
Step F 57.1569 4572.55 9907.20 118886.35
Step G 58.8715 4709.72 10204.39 122452.72
Step H 60.6378 4851.02 10510.55 126126.62
Step I 62.4568 4996.54 10825.85 129910.14
Step J 64.3306 5146.45 11150.64 133807.65
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2546B Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst I-B
Step A 39.8435 3187.48 6906.21 82874.48
Step B 42.1498 3371.98 7305.97 87671.58
Step C 43.4143 3473.14 7525.15 90301.74
Step D 44.7167 3577.34 7750.89 93010.74
Step E 46.0582 3684.66 7983.42 95801.06
Step F 47.4400 3795.20 8222.93 98675.20
Step G 48.8632 3909.06 8469.62 101635.46
Step H 50.3291 4026.33 8723.71 104684.53
Step I 51.8390 4147.12 8985.43 107825.12
Step J 53.3941 4271.53 9254.98 111059.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2547B Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst II-B
Step A 43.8288 3506.30 7596.99 91163.90
Step B 46.3659 3709.27 8036.76 96441.07
Step C 47.7568 3820.54 8277.85 99334.14
Step D 49.1895 3935.16 8526.18 102314.16
Step E 50.6652 4053.22 8781.97 105383.62
Step F 52.1852 4174.82 9045.43 108545.22
Step G 53.7507 4300.06 9316.79 111801.46
Step H 55.3633 4429.06 9596.31 115155.66
Step I 57.0241 4561.93 9884.18 118610.13
Step J 58.7349 4698.79 10180.72 122168.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1122B Environmental Utilities Business
Services Manager-B
Step A 63.6319 5090.55 11029.53 132354.35
Step B 67.3152 5385.22 11667.97 140015.62
Step C 69.3347 5546.78 12018.01 144216.18
Step D 71.4146 5713.17 12378.53 148542.37
Step E 73.5571 5884.57 12749.90 152998.77
Step F 75.7638 6061.10 13132.39 157588.70
Step G 78.0369 6242.95 13526.40 162316.75
Step H 80.3779 6430.23 13932.17 167186.03
Step I 82.7893 6623.14 14350.15 172201.74
Step J 85.2729 6821.83 14780.64 177367.63
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2541B Environmental Utilities Compliance
Administrator-B
Step A 50.0900 4007.20 8682.27 104187.20
Step B 52.9891 4239.13 9184.78 110217.33
Step C 54.5788 4366.30 9460.33 113523.90
Step D 56.2163 4497.30 9744.16 116929.90
Step E 57.9027 4632.22 10036.47 120437.62
Step F 59.6398 4771.18 10337.57 124050.78
Step G 61.4289 4914.31 10647.68 127772.11
Step H 63.2719 5061.75 10967.13 131605.55
Step I 65.1700 5213.60 11296.13 135553.60
Step J 67.1251 5370.01 11635.02 139620.21
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1684B Environmental Utilities Director-B Step A 96.0927 7687.42 16656.07 199872.82 Step B 101.6548 8132.38 17620.17 211441.98
Step C 104.7045 8376.36 18148.78 217785.36
Step D 107.8456 8627.65 18693.24 224318.85
Step E 111.0809 8886.47 19254.02 231048.27
Step F 114.4134 9153.07 19831.66 237979.87
Step G 117.8458 9427.66 20426.61 245119.26
Step H 121.3811 9710.49 21039.39 252472.69
Step I 125.0227 10001.82 21670.60 260047.22
Step J 128.7732 10301.86 22320.69 267848.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1024B Environmental Utilities Maintenance
Superintendent-B
Step A 58.2453 4659.62 10095.85 121150.22
Step B 61.6174 4929.39 10680.35 128164.19
Step C 63.4659 5077.27 11000.76 132009.07
Step D 65.3699 5229.59 11330.78 135969.39
Step E 67.3310 5386.48 11670.71 140048.48
Step F 69.3509 5548.07 12020.82 144249.87
Step G 71.4315 5714.52 12381.46 148577.52
Step H 73.5744 5885.95 12752.90 153034.75
Step I 75.7817 6062.54 13135.49 157625.94
Step J 78.0551 6244.41 13529.55 162354.61
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1147B Environmental Utilities Operations
Superintendent-B
Step A 57.1887 4575.10 9912.71 118952.50
Step B 60.4990 4839.92 10486.49 125837.92
Step C 62.3139 4985.11 10801.08 129612.91
Step D 64.1834 5134.67 11125.12 133501.47
Step E 66.1089 5288.71 11458.88 137506.51
Step F 68.0921 5447.37 11802.63 141631.57
Step G 70.1349 5610.79 12156.72 145880.59
Step H 72.2389 5779.11 12521.41 150256.91
Step I 74.4061 5952.49 12897.06 154764.69
Step J 76.6383 6131.06 13283.97 159407.66
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4321B Facilities Supervisor-B Step A 40.2709 3221.67 6980.29 83763.47 Step B 42.6019 3408.15 7384.33 88611.95
Step C 43.8800 3510.40 7605.87 91270.40
Step D 45.1964 3615.71 7834.04 94008.51
Step E 46.5523 3724.18 8069.07 96828.78
Step F 47.9490 3835.92 8311.16 99733.92
Step G 49.3873 3950.98 8560.47 102725.58
Step H 50.8689 4069.51 8817.28 105807.31
Step I 52.3950 4191.60 9081.80 108981.60
Step J 53.9669 4317.35 9354.26 112251.15
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2900B Finance Manager-B Step A 62.8047 5024.38 10886.15 130633.78 Step B 66.4401 5315.21 11516.28 138195.41
Step C 68.4333 5474.66 11861.77 142341.26
Step D 70.4862 5638.90 12217.61 146611.30
Step E 72.6009 5808.07 12584.16 151009.87
Step F 74.7789 5982.31 12961.68 155540.11
Step G 77.0224 6161.79 13350.55 160206.59
Step H 79.3330 6346.64 13751.05 165012.64
Step I 81.7130 6537.04 14163.59 169963.04
Step J 84.1643 6733.14 14588.48 175061.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0905ZB Fire Battalion Chief 8Hr-ZB Step A 61.5522 4924.18 10669.05 128028.58 Step B 65.1108 5208.86 11285.87 135430.46
Step C 67.0641 5365.13 11624.44 139493.33
Step D 69.0761 5526.09 11973.19 143678.29
Step E 71.1483 5691.86 12332.37 147988.46
Step F 73.2828 5862.62 12702.35 152428.22
Step G 75.4813 6038.50 13083.43 157001.10
Step H 77.7457 6219.66 13475.92 161711.06
Step I 80.0780 6406.24 13880.19 166562.24
Step J 82.4855 6598.84 14297.49 171569.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0905B Fire Battalion Chief-B Step A 43.9657 4924.16 10669.01 128028.12 Step B 46.5077 5208.86 11285.87 135430.42
Step C 47.9031 5365.15 11624.49 139493.83
Step D 49.3401 5526.09 11973.20 143678.37
Step E 50.8204 5691.88 12332.42 147989.00
Step F 52.3450 5862.64 12702.39 152428.64
Step G 53.9152 6038.50 13083.42 157001.06
Step H 55.5327 6219.66 13475.94 161711.22
Step I 57.1986 6406.24 13880.19 166562.32
Step J 58.9184 6598.86 14297.53 171570.38
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3330B Fire Chief-B Step A 89.2835 7142.68 15475.81 185709.68 Step B 94.4513 7556.10 16371.56 196458.70
Step C 97.2850 7782.80 16862.73 202352.80
Step D 100.2035 8016.28 17368.61 208423.28
Step E 103.2096 8256.77 17889.66 214675.97
Step F 106.3059 8504.47 18426.36 221116.27
Step G 109.4950 8759.60 18979.13 227749.60
Step H 112.7799 9022.39 19548.52 234582.19
Step I 116.1633 9293.06 20134.97 241619.66
Step J 119.6482 9571.86 20739.02 248868.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3332B Fire Division Chief-B Step A 67.7097 5416.78 11736.35 140836.18 Step B 71.6289 5730.31 12415.68 148988.11
Step C 73.7778 5902.22 12788.15 153457.82
Step D 75.9911 6079.29 13171.79 158061.49
Step E 78.2708 6261.66 13566.94 162803.26
Step F 80.6190 6449.52 13973.96 167687.52
Step G 83.0376 6643.01 14393.18 172718.21
Step H 85.5287 6842.30 14824.97 177899.70
Step I 88.0945 7047.56 15269.71 183236.56
Step J 90.7374 7258.99 15727.82 188733.79
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3332ZB Fire Divison Chief 24Hr-ZB Step A 48.3641 5416.78 11736.35 140836.26 Step B 51.1634 5730.30 12415.65 148987.82
Step C 52.6983 5902.21 12788.12 153457.45
Step D 54.2793 6079.28 13171.78 158061.32
Step E 55.9077 6261.66 13566.94 162803.22
Step F 57.5849 6449.51 13973.94 167687.23
Step G 59.3124 6642.99 14393.14 172717.71
Step H 61.0917 6842.27 14824.92 177899.03
Step I 62.9245 7047.54 15269.68 183236.14
Step J 64.8123 7258.98 15727.78 188733.42
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2565B Fleet Services Supervisor-B Step A 40.0219 3201.75 6937.13 83245.55 Step B 42.3385 3387.08 7338.67 88064.08
Step C 43.6087 3488.70 7558.84 90706.10
Step D 44.9170 3593.36 7785.61 93427.36
Step E 46.2644 3701.15 8019.16 96229.95
Step F 47.6523 3812.18 8259.73 99116.78
Step G 49.0819 3926.55 8507.53 102090.35
Step H 50.5544 4044.35 8762.76 105153.15
Step I 52.0710 4165.68 9025.64 108307.68
Step J 53.6332 4290.66 9296.42 111557.06
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3451B Government Relations AdministratorB Step A 57.6027 4608.22 9984.47 119813.62 Step B 60.9368 4874.94 10562.38 126748.54
Step C 62.7649 5021.19 10879.25 130550.99
Step D 64.6479 5171.83 11205.64 134467.63
Step E 66.5873 5326.98 11541.80 138501.58
Step F 68.5850 5486.80 11888.07 142656.80
Step G 70.6424 5651.39 12244.68 146936.19
Step H 72.7618 5820.94 12612.05 151344.54
Step I 74.9446 5995.57 12990.40 155884.77
Step J 77.1930 6175.44 13380.12 160561.44
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1647B Government Relations
Representative I-B
Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84
Step B 40.1445 3211.56 6958.38 83500.56
Step C 41.3490 3307.92 7167.16 86005.92
Step D 42.5894 3407.15 7382.16 88585.95
Step E 43.8670 3509.36 7603.61 91243.36
Step F 45.1830 3614.64 7831.72 93980.64
Step G 46.5386 3723.09 8066.69 96800.29
Step H 47.9347 3834.78 8308.68 99704.18
Step I 49.3728 3949.82 8557.95 102695.42
Step J 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1648B Government Relations
Representative II-B
Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44
Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3589B Housing Manager-B Step A 56.4726 4517.81 9788.58 117463.01 Step B 59.7438 4779.50 10355.59 124267.10
Step C 61.5360 4922.88 10666.24 127994.88
Step D 63.3821 5070.57 10986.23 131834.77
Step E 65.2836 5222.69 11315.82 135789.89
Step F 67.2420 5379.36 11655.28 139863.36
Step G 69.2593 5540.74 12004.95 144059.34
Step H 71.3370 5706.96 12365.08 148380.96
Step I 73.4773 5878.18 12736.07 152832.78
Step J 75.6814 6054.51 13118.11 157417.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3590B Housing Supervisor-B Step A 43.6423 3491.38 7564.67 90775.98 Step B 46.1684 3693.47 8002.52 96030.27
Step C 47.5535 3804.28 8242.61 98911.28
Step D 48.9801 3918.41 8489.88 101878.61
Step E 50.4495 4035.96 8744.58 104934.96
Step F 51.9630 4157.04 9006.92 108083.04
Step G 53.5219 4281.75 9277.13 111325.55
Step H 55.1275 4410.20 9555.43 114665.20
Step I 56.7813 4542.50 9842.09 118105.10
Step J 58.4848 4678.78 10137.37 121648.38
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3594B Human Resources Analyst I-B Step A 38.9323 3114.58 6748.27 80979.18 Step B 41.1859 3294.87 7138.89 85666.67
Step C 42.4214 3393.71 7353.04 88236.51
Step D 43.6941 3495.53 7573.64 90883.73
Step E 45.0049 3600.39 7800.85 93610.19
Step F 46.3551 3708.41 8034.88 96418.61
Step G 47.7458 3819.66 8275.94 99311.26
Step H 49.1781 3934.25 8524.20 102290.45
Step I 50.6534 4052.27 8779.92 105359.07
Step J 52.1730 4173.84 9043.32 108519.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3596B Human Resources Analyst II-B Step A 42.8255 3426.04 7423.09 89077.04 Step B 45.3044 3624.35 7852.76 94233.15
Step C 46.6634 3733.07 8088.32 97059.87
Step D 48.0634 3845.07 8330.99 99971.87
Step E 49.5054 3960.43 8580.94 102971.23
Step F 50.9904 4079.23 8838.34 106060.03
Step G 52.5202 4201.62 9103.50 109242.02
Step H 54.0959 4327.67 9376.62 112519.47
Step I 55.7187 4457.50 9657.91 115894.90
Step J 57.3903 4591.22 9947.65 119371.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3598B Human Resources Director-B Step A 81.4310 6514.48 14114.71 169376.48 Step B 86.1446 6891.57 14931.73 179180.77
Step C 88.7290 7098.32 15379.69 184556.32
Step D 91.3908 7311.26 15841.07 190092.86
Step E 94.1325 7530.60 16316.30 195795.60
Step F 96.9565 7756.52 16805.79 201669.52
Step G 99.8652 7989.22 17309.97 207719.62
Step H 102.8611 8228.89 17829.26 213951.09
Step I 105.9469 8475.75 18364.13 220369.55
Step J 109.1254 8730.03 18915.07 226980.83
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3599B Human Resources Manager-B Step A 54.1735 4333.88 9390.07 112680.88 Step B 57.3096 4584.77 9933.66 119203.97
Step C 59.0289 4722.31 10231.68 122780.11
Step D 60.7997 4863.98 10538.61 126463.38
Step E 62.6237 5009.90 10854.77 130257.30
Step F 64.5024 5160.19 11180.42 134164.99
Step G 66.4375 5315.00 11515.83 138190.00
Step H 68.4306 5474.45 11861.30 142335.65
Step I 70.4835 5638.68 12217.14 146605.68
Step J 72.5981 5807.85 12583.67 151004.05
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1002B Hydrogeologist-B Step A 59.4196 4753.57 10299.40 123592.77 Step B 62.8589 5028.71 10895.54 130746.51
Step C 64.7446 5179.57 11222.40 134668.77
Step D 66.6871 5334.97 11559.10 138709.17
Step E 68.6876 5495.01 11905.85 142870.21
Step F 70.7483 5659.86 12263.04 147156.46
Step G 72.8707 5829.66 12630.92 151571.06
Step H 75.0568 6004.54 13009.85 156118.14
Step I 77.3085 6184.68 13400.14 160801.68
Step J 79.6278 6370.22 13802.15 165625.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3625B Information Security Administrator-B Step A 54.7221 4377.77 9485.16 113821.97 Step B 57.8897 4631.18 10034.21 120410.58
Step C 59.6263 4770.10 10335.23 124022.70
Step D 61.4152 4913.22 10645.30 127743.62
Step E 63.2576 5060.61 10964.65 131575.81
Step F 65.1552 5212.42 11293.57 135522.82
Step G 67.1099 5368.79 11632.38 139588.59
Step H 69.1233 5529.86 11981.37 143776.46
Step I 71.1970 5695.76 12340.81 148089.76
Step J 73.3330 5866.64 12711.05 152532.64
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9542B Information Technology Client
Services Supervisor-B
Step A 47.7791 3822.33 8281.71 99380.53
Step B 50.5448 4043.58 8761.10 105133.18
Step C 52.0612 4164.90 9023.94 108287.30
Step D 53.6229 4289.83 9294.64 111535.63
Step E 55.2317 4418.54 9573.49 114881.94
Step F 56.8887 4551.10 9860.71 118328.50
Step G 58.5952 4687.62 10156.50 121878.02
Step H 60.3532 4828.26 10461.22 125534.66
Step I 62.1638 4973.10 10775.06 129300.70
Step J 64.0287 5122.30 11098.31 133179.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3602B Information Technology Program
Manager-B
Step A 54.7230 4377.84 9485.32 113823.84
Step B 57.8904 4631.23 10034.34 120412.03
Step C 59.6271 4770.17 10335.36 124024.37
Step D 61.4158 4913.26 10645.41 127744.86
Step E 63.2583 5060.66 10964.77 131577.26
Step F 65.1561 5212.49 11293.72 135524.69
Step G 67.1108 5368.86 11632.54 139590.46
Step H 69.1241 5529.93 11981.51 143778.13
Step I 71.1978 5695.82 12340.95 148091.42
Step J 73.3338 5866.70 12711.19 152534.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1140B Intelligent Transportation Systems
Maintenance Supervisor-B
Step A 58.2457 4659.66 10095.92 121151.06
Step B 61.6172 4929.38 10680.31 128163.78
Step C 63.4657 5077.26 11000.72 132008.66
Step D 65.3697 5229.58 11330.75 135968.98
Step E 67.3308 5386.46 11670.67 140048.06
Step F 69.3507 5548.06 12020.79 144249.46
Step G 71.4313 5714.50 12381.43 148577.10
Step H 73.5742 5885.94 12752.86 153034.34
Step I 75.7814 6062.51 13135.44 157625.31
Step J 78.0549 6244.39 13529.52 162354.19
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3810B Key Accounts Representative-B Step A 59.2013 4736.10 10261.56 123138.70 Step B 62.6282 5010.26 10855.55 130266.66
Step C 64.5071 5160.57 11181.23 134174.77
Step D 66.4422 5315.38 11516.65 138199.78
Step E 68.4356 5474.85 11862.17 142346.05
Step F 70.4886 5639.09 12218.02 146616.29
Step G 72.6032 5808.26 12584.55 151014.66
Step H 74.7813 5982.50 12962.09 155545.10
Step I 77.0248 6161.98 13350.97 160211.58
Step J 79.3355 6346.84 13751.49 165017.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9544B Library Supervisor-B Step A 35.1205 2809.64 6087.55 73050.64 Step B 37.1538 2972.30 6439.99 77279.90
Step C 38.2684 3061.47 6633.19 79598.27
Step D 39.4164 3153.31 6832.18 81986.11
Step E 40.5989 3247.91 7037.14 84445.71
Step F 41.8169 3345.35 7248.26 86979.15
Step G 43.0714 3445.71 7465.71 89588.51
Step H 44.3635 3549.08 7689.67 92276.08
Step I 45.6944 3655.55 7920.36 95044.35
Step J 47.0653 3765.22 8157.99 97895.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4449B Management Analyst - City Manager
Office-B
Step A 43.8300 3506.40 7597.20 91166.40
Step B 46.3669 3709.35 8036.93 96443.15
Step C 47.7578 3820.62 8278.02 99336.22
Step D 49.1906 3935.25 8526.37 102316.45
Step E 50.6664 4053.31 8782.18 105386.11
Step F 52.1863 4174.90 9045.63 108547.50
Step G 53.7519 4300.15 9317.00 111803.95
Step H 55.3645 4429.16 9596.51 115158.16
Step I 57.0254 4562.03 9884.40 118612.83
Step J 58.7362 4698.90 10180.94 122171.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0045B Management Analyst I-B Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 40.1445 3211.56 6958.38 83500.56
Step C 41.3490 3307.92 7167.16 86005.92
Step D 42.5894 3407.15 7382.16 88585.95
Step E 43.8670 3509.36 7603.61 91243.36
Step F 45.1830 3614.64 7831.72 93980.64
Step G 46.5386 3723.09 8066.69 96800.29
Step H 47.9347 3834.78 8308.68 99704.18
Step I 49.3728 3949.82 8557.95 102695.42
Step J 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0050B Management Analyst II-B Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5020B Park Development Project Manager IB Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 40.1445 3211.56 6958.38 83500.56
Step C 41.3490 3307.92 7167.16 86005.92
Step D 42.5894 3407.15 7382.16 88585.95
Step E 43.8670 3509.36 7603.61 91243.36
Step F 45.1830 3614.64 7831.72 93980.64
Step G 46.5386 3723.09 8066.69 96800.29
Step H 47.9347 3834.78 8308.68 99704.18
Step I 49.3728 3949.82 8557.95 102695.42
Step J 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5022B Park Development Project Manager
II-B
Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44
Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1106B Park Planning and Development
Manager-B
Step A 52.8062 4224.50 9153.07 109836.90
Step B 55.8634 4469.07 9682.99 116195.87
Step C 57.5395 4603.16 9973.51 119682.16
Step D 59.2656 4741.25 10272.70 123272.45
Step E 61.0435 4883.48 10580.87 126970.48
Step F 62.8749 5029.99 10898.32 130779.79
Step G 64.7610 5180.88 11225.24 134702.88
Step H 66.7039 5336.31 11562.01 138744.11
Step I 68.7051 5496.41 11908.88 142906.61
Step J 70.7662 5661.30 12266.14 147193.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5082B Parks Recreation and Libraries
Director-B
Step A 85.5031 6840.25 14820.54 177846.45
Step B 90.4523 7236.18 15678.40 188140.78
Step C 93.1658 7453.26 16148.74 193784.86
Step D 95.9608 7676.86 16633.21 199598.46
Step E 98.8396 7907.17 17132.20 205586.37
Step F 101.8049 8144.39 17646.18 211754.19
Step G 104.8590 8388.72 18175.56 218106.72
Step H 108.0048 8640.38 18720.83 224649.98
Step I 111.2449 8899.59 19282.45 231389.39
Step J 114.5823 9166.58 19860.93 238331.18
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9547B Parks Recreation and Libraries
Manager-B
Step A 52.8062 4224.50 9153.07 109836.90
Step B 55.8634 4469.07 9682.99 116195.87
Step C 57.5395 4603.16 9973.51 119682.16
Step D 59.2656 4741.25 10272.70 123272.45
Step E 61.0435 4883.48 10580.87 126970.48
Step F 62.8749 5029.99 10898.32 130779.79
Step G 64.7610 5180.88 11225.24 134702.88
Step H 66.7039 5336.31 11562.01 138744.11
Step I 68.7051 5496.41 11908.88 142906.61
Step J 70.7662 5661.30 12266.14 147193.70
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9546B Parks and Open Space
Superintendent-B
Step A 45.9191 3673.53 7959.31 95511.73
Step B 48.5770 3886.16 8420.01 101040.16
Step C 50.0343 4002.74 8672.61 104071.34
Step D 51.5352 4122.82 8932.77 107193.22
Step E 53.0813 4246.50 9200.76 110409.10
Step F 54.6738 4373.90 9476.79 113721.50
Step G 56.3140 4505.12 9761.09 117133.12
Step H 58.0034 4640.27 10053.92 120647.07
Step I 59.7436 4779.49 10355.56 124266.69
Step J 61.5358 4922.86 10666.21 127994.46
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5069B Parks and Open Space Supervisor-B Step A 38.0204 3041.63 6590.20 79082.43 Step B 40.2215 3217.72 6971.73 83660.72
Step C 41.4282 3314.26 7180.89 86170.66
Step D 42.6710 3413.68 7396.31 88755.68
Step E 43.9512 3516.10 7618.21 91418.50
Step F 45.2696 3621.57 7846.73 94160.77
Step G 46.6277 3730.22 8082.13 96985.62
Step H 48.0266 3842.13 8324.61 99895.33
Step I 49.4674 3957.39 8574.35 102892.19
Step J 50.9514 4076.11 8831.58 105978.91
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1124B Payroll Analyst I-B Step A 37.9480 3035.84 6577.65 78931.84 Step B 40.1445 3211.56 6958.38 83500.56
Step C 41.3490 3307.92 7167.16 86005.92
Step D 42.5894 3407.15 7382.16 88585.95
Step E 43.8670 3509.36 7603.61 91243.36
Step F 45.1830 3614.64 7831.72 93980.64
Step G 46.5386 3723.09 8066.69 96800.29
Step H 47.9347 3834.78 8308.68 99704.18
Step I 49.3728 3949.82 8557.95 102695.42
Step J 50.8539 4068.31 8814.68 105776.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1125B Payroll Analyst II-B Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9428B Payroll Supervisor-B Step A 49.6233 3969.86 8601.37 103216.46 Step B 52.4956 4199.65 9099.24 109190.85
Step C 54.0705 4325.64 9372.22 112466.64
Step D 55.6926 4455.41 9653.38 115840.61
Step E 57.3634 4589.07 9942.99 119315.87
Step F 59.0843 4726.74 10241.28 122895.34
Step G 60.8568 4868.54 10548.51 126582.14
Step H 62.6825 5014.60 10864.97 130379.60
Step I 64.5630 5165.04 11190.92 134291.04
Step J 66.4999 5319.99 11526.65 138319.79
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1501B Permits Supervisor-B Step A 41.7430 3339.44 7235.45 86825.44 Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5309B Planning Manager-B Step A 66.4534 5316.27 11518.59 138223.07 Step B 70.3000 5624.00 12185.33 146224.00
Step C 72.4090 5792.72 12550.89 150610.72
Step D 74.5812 5966.50 12927.41 155128.90
Step E 76.8187 6145.50 13315.24 159782.90
Step F 79.1232 6329.86 13714.69 164576.26
Step G 81.4970 6519.76 14126.15 169513.76
Step H 83.9419 6715.35 14549.93 174599.15
Step I 86.4601 6916.81 14986.42 179837.01
Step J 89.0539 7124.31 15436.01 185232.11
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5400B Police Captain-B Step A 75.3795 6030.36 13065.78 156789.36 Step B 79.7427 6379.42 13822.07 165864.82
Step C 82.1350 6570.80 14236.73 170840.80
Step D 84.5991 6767.93 14663.84 175966.13
Step E 87.1371 6970.97 15103.76 181245.17
Step F 89.7512 7180.10 15556.87 186682.50
Step G 92.4437 7395.50 16023.57 192282.90
Step H 95.2169 7617.35 16504.26 198051.15
Step I 98.0735 7845.88 16999.41 203992.88
Step J 101.0157 8081.26 17509.39 210112.66
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5410B Police Chief-B Step A 98.5831 7886.65 17087.74 205052.85 Step B 104.2896 8343.17 18076.86 216922.37
Step C 107.4183 8593.46 18619.17 223430.06
Step D 110.6407 8851.26 19177.72 230132.66
Step E 113.9600 9116.80 19753.07 237036.80
Step F 117.3788 9390.30 20345.66 244147.90
Step G 120.9002 9672.02 20956.03 251472.42
Step H 124.5273 9962.18 21584.73 259016.78
Step I 128.2630 10261.04 22232.25 266787.04
Step J 132.1109 10568.87 22899.22 274790.67
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5420B Police Lieutenant-B Step A 62.8195 5025.56 10888.71 130664.56 Step B 66.4559 5316.47 11519.02 138228.27
Step C 68.4496 5475.97 11864.60 142375.17
Step D 70.5031 5640.25 12220.54 146646.45
Step E 72.6182 5809.46 12587.15 151045.86
Step F 74.7967 5983.74 12964.76 155577.14
Step G 77.0405 6163.24 13353.69 160244.24
Step H 79.3518 6348.14 13754.31 165051.74
Step I 81.7324 6538.59 14166.95 170003.39
Step J 84.1844 6734.75 14591.96 175103.55
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5489B Police Services Administrator-B Step A 55.9340 4474.72 9695.23 116342.72 Step B 59.1716 4733.73 10256.41 123076.93
Step C 60.9468 4875.74 10564.11 126769.34
Step D 62.7753 5022.02 10881.05 130572.62
Step E 64.6585 5172.68 11207.47 134489.68
Step F 66.5983 5327.86 11543.71 138524.46
Step G 68.5962 5487.70 11890.01 142680.10
Step H 70.6542 5652.34 12246.73 146960.74
Step I 72.7738 5821.90 12614.13 151369.50
Step J 74.9570 5996.56 12992.55 155910.56
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1138B Police Social Services Practitioner I-B Step A 35.3582 2828.66 6128.75 73545.06 Step B 37.4049 2992.39 6483.52 77802.19
Step C 38.5270 3082.16 6678.01 80136.16
Step D 39.6828 3174.62 6878.35 82540.22
Step E 40.8733 3269.86 7084.71 85016.46
Step F 42.0995 3367.96 7297.25 87566.96
Step G 43.3625 3469.00 7516.17 90194.00
Step H 44.6634 3573.07 7741.66 92899.87
Step I 46.0033 3680.26 7973.91 95686.86
Step J 47.3834 3790.67 8213.12 98557.47
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1139B Police Social Services Practitioner IIB Step A 38.8940 3111.52 6741.63 80899.52 Step B 41.1454 3291.63 7131.87 85582.43
Step C 42.3797 3390.38 7345.81 88149.78
Step D 43.6511 3492.09 7566.19 90794.29
Step E 44.9606 3596.85 7793.17 93518.05
Step F 46.3095 3704.76 8026.98 96323.76
Step G 47.6987 3815.90 8267.77 99213.30
Step H 49.1297 3930.38 8515.81 102189.78
Step I 50.6036 4048.29 8771.29 105255.49
Step J 52.1217 4169.74 9034.43 108413.14
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1126B Police Social Services Supervisor-B Step A 44.7281 3578.25 7752.87 93034.45 Step B 47.3172 3785.38 8201.65 98419.78
Step C 48.7367 3898.94 8447.69 101372.34
Step D 50.1987 4015.90 8701.11 104413.30
Step E 51.7047 4136.38 8962.15 107545.78
Step F 53.2558 4260.46 9231.01 110772.06
Step G 54.8536 4388.29 9507.96 114095.49
Step H 56.4992 4519.94 9793.19 117518.34
Step I 58.1942 4655.54 10086.99 121043.94
Step J 59.9400 4795.20 10389.60 124675.20
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5505B Power Engineering Manager-B Step A 86.3391 6907.13 14965.44 179585.33 Step B 91.3368 7306.94 15831.71 189980.54
Step C 94.0768 7526.14 16306.65 195679.74
Step D 96.8991 7751.93 16795.84 201550.13
Step E 99.8060 7984.48 17299.71 207596.48
Step F 102.8003 8224.02 17818.72 213824.62
Step G 105.8843 8470.74 18353.28 220239.34
Step H 109.0609 8724.87 18903.89 226846.67
Step I 112.3327 8986.62 19471.00 233652.02
Step J 115.7026 9256.21 20055.12 240661.41
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5600B Power Generation Superintendent-B Step A 86.8145 6945.16 15047.85 180574.16 Step B 91.8396 7347.17 15918.86 191026.37
Step C 94.5948 7567.58 16396.43 196757.18
Step D 97.4327 7794.62 16888.33 202660.02
Step E 100.3557 8028.46 17394.99 208739.86
Step F 103.3663 8269.30 17916.83 215001.90
Step G 106.4674 8517.39 18454.35 221452.19
Step H 109.6614 8772.91 19007.98 228095.71
Step I 112.9512 9036.10 19578.21 234938.50
Step J 116.3397 9307.18 20165.55 241986.58
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5530B Power Plant Operations and
Maintenance Supervisor-B
Step A 78.9232 6313.86 13680.02 164160.26
Step B 83.4917 6679.34 14471.89 173662.74
Step C 85.9965 6879.72 14906.06 178872.72
Step D 88.5763 7086.10 15353.23 184238.70
Step E 91.2336 7298.69 15813.82 189765.89
Step F 93.9706 7517.65 16288.24 195458.85
Step G 96.7898 7743.18 16776.90 201322.78
Step H 99.6934 7975.47 17280.19 207362.27
Step I 102.6843 8214.74 17798.61 213583.34
Step J 105.7648 8461.18 18332.57 219990.78
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5535B Power Supply and Portfolio
Administrator-B
Step A 86.3352 6906.82 14964.77 179577.22
Step B 91.3327 7306.62 15831.00 189972.02
Step C 94.0726 7525.81 16305.92 195671.01
Step D 96.8947 7751.58 16795.08 201540.98
Step E 99.8016 7984.13 17298.94 207587.33
Step F 102.7957 8223.66 17817.92 213815.06
Step G 105.8795 8470.36 18352.45 220229.36
Step H 109.0559 8724.47 18903.02 226836.27
Step I 112.3276 8986.21 19470.12 233641.41
Step J 115.6974 9255.79 20054.22 240650.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5519B Preventative Maintenance
Supervisor-B
Step A 52.9503 4236.02 9178.05 110136.62
Step B 56.0159 4481.27 9709.42 116513.07
Step C 57.6964 4615.71 10000.71 120008.51
Step D 59.4272 4754.18 10300.71 123608.58
Step E 61.2100 4896.80 10609.73 127316.80
Step F 63.0463 5043.70 10928.03 131136.30
Step G 64.9378 5195.02 11255.89 135070.62
Step H 66.8859 5350.87 11593.56 139122.67
Step I 68.8924 5511.39 11941.35 143296.19
Step J 70.9592 5676.74 12299.59 147595.14
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5514B Principal Engineer-B Step A 59.4196 4753.57 10299.40 123592.77 Step B 62.8589 5028.71 10895.54 130746.51
Step C 64.7446 5179.57 11222.40 134668.77
Step D 66.6871 5334.97 11559.10 138709.17
Step E 68.6876 5495.01 11905.85 142870.21
Step F 70.7483 5659.86 12263.04 147156.46
Step G 72.8707 5829.66 12630.92 151571.06
Step H 75.0568 6004.54 13009.85 156118.14
Step I 77.3085 6184.68 13400.14 160801.68
Step J 79.6278 6370.22 13802.15 165625.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5513B Principal Planner-B Step A 55.3792 4430.34 9599.06 115188.74 Step B 58.5849 4686.79 10154.72 121856.59
Step C 60.3423 4827.38 10459.33 125511.98
Step D 62.1527 4972.22 10773.13 129277.62
Step E 64.0173 5121.38 11096.33 133155.98
Step F 65.9378 5275.02 11429.22 137150.62
Step G 67.9158 5433.26 11772.07 141264.86
Step H 69.9534 5596.27 12125.26 145503.07
Step I 72.0520 5764.16 12489.01 149868.16
Step J 74.2135 5937.08 12863.67 154364.08
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1114B Principal Power Engineer-B Step A 82.5816 6606.53 14314.14 171769.73 Step B 87.3618 6988.94 15142.71 181712.54
Step C 89.9826 7198.61 15596.98 187163.81
Step D 92.6821 7414.57 16064.90 192778.77
Step E 95.4626 7637.01 16546.85 198562.21
Step F 98.3265 7866.12 17043.26 204519.12
Step G 101.2763 8102.10 17554.56 210654.70
Step H 104.3145 8345.16 18081.18 216974.16
Step I 107.4440 8595.52 18623.63 223483.52
Step J 110.6673 8853.38 19182.33 230187.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1115B Principal Power Plant Engineer-B Step A 82.5816 6606.53 14314.14 171769.73 Step B 87.3618 6988.94 15142.71 181712.54
Step C 89.9826 7198.61 15596.98 187163.81
Step D 92.6821 7414.57 16064.90 192778.77
Step E 95.4626 7637.01 16546.85 198562.21
Step F 98.3265 7866.12 17043.26 204519.12
Step G 101.2763 8102.10 17554.56 210654.70
Step H 104.3145 8345.16 18081.18 216974.16
Step I 107.4440 8595.52 18623.63 223483.52
Step J 110.6673 8853.38 19182.33 230187.98
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1004B Process Engineer-B Step A 59.4196 4753.57 10299.40 123592.77 Step B 62.8589 5028.71 10895.54 130746.51
Step C 64.7446 5179.57 11222.40 134668.77
Step D 66.6871 5334.97 11559.10 138709.17
Step E 68.6876 5495.01 11905.85 142870.21
Step F 70.7483 5659.86 12263.04 147156.46
Step G 72.8707 5829.66 12630.92 151571.06
Step H 75.0568 6004.54 13009.85 156118.14
Step I 77.3085 6184.68 13400.14 160801.68
Step J 79.6278 6370.22 13802.15 165625.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1069B Project Supervisor-B Step A 51.6694 4133.55 8956.03 107472.35 Step B 54.6603 4372.82 9474.45 113693.42
Step C 56.3001 4504.01 9758.68 117104.21
Step D 57.9892 4639.14 10051.46 120617.54
Step E 59.7288 4778.30 10352.99 124235.90
Step F 61.5207 4921.66 10663.59 127963.06
Step G 63.3663 5069.30 10983.49 131801.90
Step H 65.2672 5221.38 11312.98 135755.78
Step I 67.2252 5378.02 11652.37 139828.42
Step J 69.2420 5539.36 12001.95 144023.36
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1108B Public Affairs and Communications
Manager-B
Step A 56.9260 4554.08 9867.17 118406.08
Step B 60.2211 4817.69 10438.32 125259.89
Step C 62.0278 4962.22 10751.49 129017.82
Step D 63.8886 5111.09 11074.02 132888.29
Step E 65.8053 5264.42 11406.25 136875.02
Step F 67.7794 5422.35 11748.43 140981.15
Step G 69.8128 5585.02 12100.89 145210.62
Step H 71.9072 5752.58 12463.91 149566.98
Step I 74.0644 5925.15 12837.83 154053.95
Step J 76.2864 6102.91 13222.98 158675.71
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5635B Public Works Director-B Step A 85.5045 6840.36 14820.78 177849.36 Step B 90.4539 7236.31 15678.68 188144.11
Step C 93.1675 7453.40 16149.03 193788.40
Step D 95.9625 7677.00 16633.50 199602.00
Step E 98.8414 7907.31 17132.51 205590.11
Step F 101.8067 8144.54 17646.49 211757.94
Step G 104.8608 8388.86 18175.87 218110.46
Step H 108.0067 8640.54 18721.16 224653.94
Step I 111.2469 8899.75 19282.80 231393.55
Step J 114.5843 9166.74 19861.28 238335.34
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1087B Public Works Manager-B Step A 56.8363 4546.90 9851.63 118219.50 Step B 60.1263 4810.10 10421.89 125062.70
Step C 61.9302 4954.42 10734.57 128814.82
Step D 63.7880 5103.04 11056.59 132679.04
Step E 65.7017 5256.14 11388.29 136659.54
Step F 67.6727 5413.82 11729.93 140759.22
Step G 69.7029 5576.23 12081.84 144982.03
Step H 71.7941 5743.53 12444.31 149331.73
Step I 73.9477 5915.82 12817.60 153811.22
Step J 76.1663 6093.30 13202.16 158425.90
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1129B Purchasing Supervisor-B Step A 41.8409 3347.27 7252.42 87029.07 Step B 44.2628 3541.02 7672.22 92066.62
Step C 45.5907 3647.26 7902.39 94828.66
Step D 46.9584 3756.67 8139.46 97673.47
Step E 48.3672 3869.38 8383.65 100603.78
Step F 49.8182 3985.46 8635.15 103621.86
Step G 51.3127 4105.02 8894.20 106730.42
Step H 52.8521 4228.17 9161.03 109932.37
Step I 54.4376 4355.01 9435.85 113230.21
Step J 56.0708 4485.66 9718.94 116627.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5652B Purchasing and Warehouse
Manager-B
Step A 54.1615 4332.92 9387.99 112655.92
Step B 57.2966 4583.73 9931.41 119176.93
Step C 59.0155 4721.24 10229.35 122752.24
Step D 60.7859 4862.87 10536.22 126434.67
Step E 62.6095 5008.76 10852.31 130227.76
Step F 64.4878 5159.02 11177.89 134134.62
Step G 66.4224 5313.79 11513.22 138158.59
Step H 68.4151 5473.21 11858.62 142303.41
Step I 70.4676 5637.41 12214.38 146572.61
Step J 72.5816 5806.53 12580.81 150969.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1143B Recreation Superintendent-B Step A 45.9191 3673.53 7959.31 95511.73 Step B 48.5570 3884.56 8416.55 100998.56
Step C 50.0343 4002.74 8672.61 104071.34
Step D 51.5352 4122.82 8932.77 107193.22
Step E 53.0813 4246.50 9200.76 110409.10
Step F 54.6738 4373.90 9476.79 113721.50
Step G 56.3140 4505.12 9761.09 117133.12
Step H 58.0034 4640.27 10053.92 120647.07
Step I 59.7436 4779.49 10355.56 124266.69
Step J 61.5358 4922.86 10666.21 127994.46
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1144B Recreation Supervisor-B Step A 35.1205 2809.64 6087.55 73050.64 Step B 37.1538 2972.30 6439.99 77279.90
Step C 38.2684 3061.47 6633.19 79598.27
Step D 39.4164 3153.31 6832.18 81986.11
Step E 40.5989 3247.91 7037.14 84445.71
Step F 41.8169 3345.35 7248.26 86979.15
Step G 43.0714 3445.71 7465.71 89588.51
Step H 44.3635 3549.08 7689.67 92276.08
Step I 45.6944 3655.55 7920.36 95044.35
Step J 47.0653 3765.22 8157.99 97895.82
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6231B Refuse Superintendent-B Step A 49.7828 3982.62 8629.02 103548.22 Step B 52.6644 4213.15 9128.50 109541.95
Step C 54.2443 4339.54 9402.35 112828.14
Step D 55.8716 4469.73 9684.41 116212.93
Step E 57.5479 4603.83 9974.97 119699.63
Step F 59.2743 4741.94 10274.21 123290.54
Step G 61.0525 4884.20 10582.43 126989.20
Step H 62.8840 5030.72 10899.89 130798.72
Step I 64.7705 5181.64 11226.89 134722.64
Step J 66.7137 5337.10 11563.71 138764.50
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6235B Refuse Supervisor-B Step A 41.4857 3318.86 7190.85 86290.26 Step B 43.8863 3510.90 7606.96 91283.50
Step C 45.2029 3616.23 7835.17 94022.03
Step D 46.5590 3724.72 8070.23 96842.72
Step E 47.9557 3836.46 8312.32 99747.86
Step F 49.3944 3951.55 8561.70 102740.35
Step G 50.8763 4070.10 8818.56 105822.70
Step H 52.4026 4192.21 9083.12 108997.41
Step I 53.9747 4317.98 9355.61 112267.38
Step J 55.5939 4447.51 9636.28 115635.31
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6244B Refuse and Stormwater Manager-B Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.7182 5657.46 12257.82 147093.86
Step C 72.8398 5827.18 12625.57 151506.78
Step D 75.0251 6002.01 13004.35 156052.21
Step E 77.2759 6182.07 13394.49 160733.87
Step F 79.5942 6367.54 13796.33 165555.94
Step G 81.9819 6558.55 14210.20 170522.35
Step H 84.4414 6755.31 14636.51 175638.11
Step I 86.9746 6957.97 15075.60 180907.17
Step J 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6450B Risk Manager-B Step A 59.5910 4767.28 10329.11 123949.28 Step B 63.0404 5043.23 10927.00 131124.03
Step C 64.9316 5194.53 11254.81 135057.73
Step D 66.8796 5350.37 11592.46 139109.57
Step E 68.8860 5510.88 11940.24 143282.88
Step F 70.9526 5676.21 12298.45 147581.41
Step G 73.0811 5846.49 12667.39 152008.69
Step H 75.2735 6021.88 13047.41 156568.88
Step I 77.5317 6202.54 13438.83 161265.94
Step J 79.8577 6388.62 13842.00 166104.02
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6500B Safety Coordinator-B Step A 41.7429 3339.43 7235.44 86825.23 Step B 44.1591 3532.73 7654.24 91850.93
Step C 45.4838 3638.70 7883.86 94606.30
Step D 46.8483 3747.86 8120.37 97444.46
Step E 48.2538 3860.30 8363.99 100367.90
Step F 49.7014 3976.11 8614.91 103378.91
Step G 51.1924 4095.39 8873.35 106480.19
Step H 52.7282 4218.26 9139.55 109674.66
Step I 54.3101 4344.81 9413.75 112965.01
Step J 55.9394 4475.15 9696.16 116353.95
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7130B Senior Business Systems Analyst-B Step A 45.5054 3640.43 7887.60 94651.23 Step B 48.1394 3851.15 8344.16 100129.95
Step C 49.5836 3966.69 8594.49 103133.89
Step D 51.0711 4085.69 8852.32 106227.89
Step E 52.6032 4208.26 9117.89 109414.66
Step F 54.1815 4334.52 9391.46 112697.52
Step G 55.8069 4464.55 9673.20 116078.35
Step H 57.4811 4598.49 9963.39 119560.69
Step I 59.2055 4736.44 10262.29 123147.44
Step J 60.9817 4878.54 10570.16 126841.94
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7145B Senior Database Analyst-B Step A 45.5054 3640.43 7887.60 94651.23 Step B 48.1394 3851.15 8344.16 100129.95
Step C 49.5836 3966.69 8594.49 103133.89
Step D 51.0711 4085.69 8852.32 106227.89
Step E 52.6032 4208.26 9117.89 109414.66
Step F 54.1815 4334.52 9391.46 112697.52
Step G 55.8069 4464.55 9673.20 116078.35
Step H 57.4811 4598.49 9963.39 119560.69
Step I 59.2055 4736.44 10262.29 123147.44
Step J 60.9817 4878.54 10570.16 126841.94
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7123B Senior Deputy City Attorney-B Step A 81.7948 6543.58 14177.77 170133.18 Step B 86.5295 6922.36 14998.45 179981.36
Step C 89.1253 7130.02 15448.39 185380.62
Step D 91.7991 7343.93 15911.84 190942.13
Step E 94.5530 7564.24 16389.19 196670.24
Step F 97.3897 7791.18 16880.88 202570.58
Step G 100.3114 8024.91 17387.31 208647.71
Step H 103.3207 8265.66 17908.92 214907.06
Step I 106.4203 8513.62 18446.19 221354.22
Step J 109.6129 8769.03 18999.57 227994.83
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1097B Senior Development Services
Business Analyst-B
Step A 45.5047 3640.38 7887.48 94649.78
Step B 48.1387 3851.10 8344.04 100128.50
Step C 49.5829 3966.63 8594.37 103132.43
Step D 51.0704 4085.63 8852.20 106226.43
Step E 52.6024 4208.19 9117.75 109412.99
Step F 54.1806 4334.45 9391.30 112695.65
Step G 55.8061 4464.49 9673.06 116076.69
Step H 57.4801 4598.41 9963.22 119558.61
Step I 59.2045 4736.36 10262.11 123145.36
Step J 60.9807 4878.46 10569.99 126839.86
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7128B Senior Electric Business Analyst-B Step A 59.4219 4753.75 10299.80 123597.55 Step B 62.8616 5028.93 10896.01 130752.13
Step C 64.7474 5179.79 11222.88 134674.59
Step D 66.6899 5335.19 11559.58 138714.99
Step E 68.6905 5495.24 11906.35 142876.24
Step F 70.7512 5660.10 12263.54 147162.50
Step G 72.8738 5829.90 12631.46 151577.50
Step H 75.0599 6004.79 13010.38 156124.59
Step I 77.3117 6184.94 13400.69 160808.34
Step J 79.6311 6370.49 13802.72 165632.69
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1023B Senior Electric Technology Systems
Analyst-B
Step A 61.1103 4888.82 10592.45 127109.42
Step B 64.6475 5171.80 11205.57 134466.80
Step C 66.5869 5326.95 11541.73 138500.75
Step D 68.5846 5486.77 11888.00 142655.97
Step E 70.6421 5651.37 12244.63 146935.57
Step F 72.7613 5820.90 12611.96 151343.50
Step G 74.9442 5995.54 12990.33 155883.94
Step H 77.1925 6175.40 13380.03 160560.40
Step I 79.5083 6360.66 13781.44 165377.26
Step J 81.8936 6551.49 14194.89 170338.69
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7163B Senior Energy Services Account
Representative-B
Step A 59.2013 4736.10 10261.56 123138.70
Step B 62.6282 5010.26 10855.55 130266.66
Step C 64.5071 5160.57 11181.23 134174.77
Step D 66.4422 5315.38 11516.65 138199.78
Step E 68.4356 5474.85 11862.17 142346.05
Step F 70.4886 5639.09 12218.02 146616.29
Step G 72.6032 5808.26 12584.55 151014.66
Step H 74.7813 5982.50 12962.09 155545.10
Step I 77.0248 6161.98 13350.97 160211.58
Step J 79.3355 6346.84 13751.49 165017.84
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7142B Senior Engineer-B Step A 52.8182 4225.46 9155.15 109861.86 Step B 55.8757 4470.06 9685.12 116221.46
Step C 57.5520 4604.16 9975.68 119708.16
Step D 59.2785 4742.28 10274.94 123299.28
Step E 61.0568 4884.54 10583.18 126998.14
Step F 62.8885 5031.08 10900.67 130808.08
Step G 64.7752 5182.02 11227.70 134732.42
Step H 66.7184 5337.47 11564.52 138774.27
Step I 68.7200 5497.60 11911.47 142937.60
Step J 70.7816 5662.53 12268.81 147225.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1065B Senior Environmental Utilities
Business Analyst-B
Step A 48.2147 3857.18 8357.21 100286.58
Step B 51.0055 4080.44 8840.95 106091.44
Step C 52.5357 4202.86 9106.19 109274.26
Step D 54.1117 4328.94 9379.36 112552.34
Step E 55.7351 4458.81 9660.75 115929.01
Step F 57.4071 4592.57 9950.56 119406.77
Step G 59.1294 4730.35 10249.10 122989.15
Step H 60.9032 4872.26 10556.55 126678.66
Step I 62.7303 5018.42 10873.25 130479.02
Step J 64.6122 5168.98 11199.45 134393.38
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7161B Senior GIS Analyst-B Step A 45.3077 3624.62 7853.33 94240.02 Step B 47.9302 3834.42 8307.90 99694.82
Step C 49.3681 3949.45 8557.14 102685.65
Step D 50.8492 4067.94 8813.86 105766.34
Step E 52.3747 4189.98 9078.28 108939.38
Step F 53.9459 4315.67 9350.62 112207.47
Step G 55.5643 4445.14 9631.15 115573.74
Step H 57.2312 4578.50 9920.07 119040.90
Step I 58.9482 4715.86 10217.69 122612.26
Step J 60.7167 4857.34 10524.23 126290.74
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7150B Senior Human Resources Analyst-B Step A 47.1066 3768.53 8165.14 97981.73 Step B 49.8330 3986.64 8637.72 103652.64
Step C 51.3280 4106.24 8896.85 106762.24
Step D 52.8678 4229.42 9163.75 109965.02
Step E 54.4539 4356.31 9438.68 113264.11
Step F 56.0876 4487.01 9721.85 116662.21
Step G 57.7702 4621.62 10013.50 120162.02
Step H 59.5031 4760.25 10313.87 123766.45
Step I 61.2882 4903.06 10623.29 127479.46
Step J 63.1270 5050.16 10942.01 131304.16
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7194B Senior Information Technology
Analyst-B
Step A 45.5054 3640.43 7887.60 94651.23
Step B 48.1394 3851.15 8344.16 100129.95
Step C 49.5836 3966.69 8594.49 103133.89
Step D 51.0711 4085.69 8852.32 106227.89
Step E 52.6032 4208.26 9117.89 109414.66
Step F 54.1815 4334.52 9391.46 112697.52
Step G 55.8069 4464.55 9673.20 116078.35
Step H 57.4811 4598.49 9963.39 119560.69
Step I 59.2055 4736.44 10262.29 123147.44
Step J 60.9817 4878.54 10570.16 126841.94
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1119B Senior Park Development Project
Manager-B
Step A 45.9170 3673.36 7958.95 95507.36
Step B 48.5750 3886.00 8419.67 101036.00
Step C 50.0322 4002.58 8672.25 104066.98
Step D 51.5332 4122.66 8932.42 107189.06
Step E 53.0792 4246.34 9200.39 110404.74
Step F 54.6715 4373.72 9476.39 113716.72
Step G 56.3117 4504.94 9760.69 117128.34
Step H 58.0010 4640.08 10053.51 120642.08
Step I 59.7411 4779.29 10355.12 124261.49
Step J 61.5333 4922.66 10665.77 127989.26
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7180B Senior Planner-B Step A 48.1569 3852.55 8347.20 100166.35 Step B 50.9445 4075.56 8830.38 105964.56
Step C 52.4728 4197.82 9095.29 109143.42
Step D 54.0469 4323.75 9368.13 112417.55
Step E 55.6683 4453.46 9649.17 115790.06
Step F 57.3384 4587.07 9938.66 119263.87
Step G 59.0585 4724.68 10236.81 122841.68
Step H 60.8304 4866.43 10543.94 126527.23
Step I 62.6552 5012.42 10860.23 130322.82
Step J 64.5349 5162.79 11186.05 134232.59
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Appendix:E
Effective Date:08/24/2024
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7151B Senior Power Engineer-B Step A 75.0743 6005.94 13012.88 156154.54 Step B 79.4199 6353.59 13766.12 165193.39
Step C 81.8024 6544.19 14179.08 170148.99
Step D 84.2566 6740.53 14604.48 175253.73
Step E 86.7842 6942.74 15042.59 180511.14
Step F 89.3877 7151.02 15493.87 185926.42
Step G 92.0694 7365.55 15958.70 191504.35
Step H 94.8314 7586.51 16437.44 197249.31
Step I 97.6764 7814.11 16930.58 203166.91
Step J 100.6066 8048.53 17438.48 209261.73
MGMT Management
City of Roseville