Agenda packet — Roseville City Council, September 18, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

59.4219 4753.75 10299.80 123597.55

62.8616 5028.93 10896.01 130752.13

64.7474 5179.79 11222.88 134674.59

66.6899 5335.19 11559.58 138714.99

68.6905 5495.24 11906.35 142876.24

70.7512 5660.10 12263.54 147162.50

72.8738 5829.90 12631.46 151577.50

75.0599 6004.79 13010.38 156124.59

77.3117 6184.94 13400.69 160808.34

79.6311 6370.49 13802.72 165632.69
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1042B Utility Customer Service Supervisor-B Step A 34.0428 2723.42 5900.75 70809.02 Step B 36.0132 2881.06 6242.29 74907.46
Step C 37.0936 2967.49 6429.56 77154.69
Step D 38.2064 3056.51 6622.44 79469.31
Step E 39.3527 3148.22 6821.13 81853.62
Step F 40.5332 3242.66 7025.75 84309.06
Step G 41.7493 3339.94 7236.55 86838.54
Step H 43.0017 3440.14 7453.63 89443.54
Step I 44.2918 3543.34 7677.25 92126.94
Step J 45.6205 3649.64 7907.55 94890.64
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1102B Utility Exploration Center Supervisor-
B
Step A 39.7899 3183.19 6896.92 82762.99
Step B 42.0925 3367.40 7296.03 87552.40
Step C 43.3553 3468.42 7514.92 90179.02
Step D 44.6559 3572.47 7740.36 92884.27
Step E 45.9957 3679.66 7972.59 95671.06
Step F 47.3755 3790.04 8211.75 98541.04
Step G 48.7968 3903.74 8458.11 101497.34
Step H 50.2606 4020.85 8711.84 104542.05
Step I 51.7685 4141.48 8973.21 107678.48
Step J 53.3220 4265.76 9242.48 110909.76
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1646B Utility Government Relations
Administrator-B
Step A 50.0899 4007.19 8682.25 104186.99
Step B 52.9891 4239.13 9184.78 110217.33
Step C 54.5788 4366.30 9460.33 113523.90
Step D 56.2162 4497.30 9744.14 116929.70
Step E 57.9026 4632.21 10036.45 120437.41
Step F 59.6397 4771.18 10337.55 124050.58
Step G 61.4289 4914.31 10647.68 127772.11
Step H 63.2717 5061.74 10967.09 131605.14
Step I 65.1699 5213.59 11296.12 135553.39
Step J 67.1251 5370.01 11635.02 139620.21
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8980B Wastewater Collection
Superintendent-B
Step A 49.7828 3982.62 8629.02 103548.22
Step B 52.6644 4213.15 9128.50 109541.95
Step C 54.2443 4339.54 9402.35 112828.14
Step D 55.8716 4469.73 9684.41 116212.93
Step E 57.5479 4603.83 9974.97 119699.63
Step F 59.2743 4741.94 10274.21 123290.54
Step G 61.0525 4884.20 10582.43 126989.20
Step H 62.8840 5030.72 10899.89 130798.72
Step I 64.7705 5181.64 11226.89 134722.64
Step J 66.7137 5337.10 11563.71 138764.50
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8978B Wastewater Collection Supervisor-B Step A 41.4841 3318.73 7190.58 86286.93 Step B 43.8850 3510.80 7606.73 91280.80
Step C 45.2016 3616.13 7834.94 94019.33
Step D 46.5576 3724.61 8069.98 96839.81
Step E 47.9542 3836.34 8312.06 99744.74
Step F 49.3929 3951.43 8561.44 102737.23
Step G 50.8747 4069.98 8818.28 105819.38
Step H 52.4010 4192.08 9082.84 108994.08
Step I 53.9730 4317.84 9355.32 112263.84
Step J 55.5922 4447.38 9635.98 115631.78
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9040B Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-B
Step A 51.9897 4159.18 9011.55 108138.61
Step B 54.9991 4399.93 9533.17 114398.09
Step C 56.6491 4531.92 9819.17 117830.03
Step D 58.3485 4667.88 10113.74 121364.94
Step E 60.0990 4807.92 10417.16 125005.88
Step F 61.9020 4952.16 10729.67 128756.06
Step G 63.7590 5100.72 11051.56 132618.74
Step H 65.6718 5253.74 11383.11 136597.30
Step I 67.6419 5411.35 11724.60 140695.22
Step J 69.6712 5573.70 12076.34 144916.08
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9045B Wastewater Utility Manager-B Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.7182 5657.46 12257.82 147093.86
Step C 72.8398 5827.18 12625.57 151506.78
Step D 75.0251 6002.01 13004.35 156052.21
Step E 77.2759 6182.07 13394.49 160733.87
Step F 79.5942 6367.54 13796.33 165555.94
Step G 81.9819 6558.55 14210.20 170522.35
Step H 84.4414 6755.31 14636.51 175638.11
Step I 86.9746 6957.97 15075.60 180907.17
Step J 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9047B Water Conservation Administrator-B Step A 45.6340 3650.72 7909.89 94918.72 Step B 48.2757 3862.06 8367.79 100413.46
Step C 49.7239 3977.91 8618.81 103425.71
Step D 51.2157 4097.26 8877.39 106528.66
Step E 52.7521 4220.17 9143.70 109724.37
Step F 54.3347 4346.78 9418.01 113016.18
Step G 55.9647 4477.18 9700.55 116406.58
Step H 57.6437 4611.50 9991.57 119898.90
Step I 59.3729 4749.83 10291.30 123495.63
Step J 61.1541 4892.33 10600.04 127200.53
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9085B Water Distribution Superintendent-B Step A 49.0486 3923.89 8501.76 102021.09 Step B 52.6644 4213.15 9128.50 109541.95
Step C 54.2443 4339.54 9402.35 112828.14
Step D 55.8716 4469.73 9684.41 116212.93
Step E 57.5479 4603.83 9974.97 119699.63
Step F 59.2743 4741.94 10274.21 123290.54
Step G 61.0525 4884.20 10582.43 126989.20
Step H 62.8840 5030.72 10899.89 130798.72
Step I 64.7705 5181.64 11226.89 134722.64
Step J 66.7137 5337.10 11563.71 138764.50
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9084B Water Distribution Supervisor-B Step A 41.4840 3318.72 7190.56 86286.72 Step B 43.8850 3510.80 7606.73 91280.80
Step C 45.2016 3616.13 7834.94 94019.33
Step D 46.5576 3724.61 8069.98 96839.81
Step E 47.9542 3836.34 8312.06 99744.74
Step F 49.3929 3951.43 8561.44 102737.23
Step G 50.8747 4069.98 8818.28 105819.38
Step H 52.4010 4192.08 9082.84 108994.08
Step I 53.9730 4317.84 9355.32 112263.84
Step J 55.5922 4447.38 9635.98 115631.78
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9101B Water Quality Lab Supervisor-B Step A 43.5565 3484.52 7549.79 90597.52 Step B 46.0775 3686.20 7986.77 95841.20
Step C 47.4599 3796.79 8226.38 98716.59
Step D 48.8836 3910.69 8473.16 101677.89
Step E 50.3501 4028.01 8727.35 104728.21
Step F 51.8607 4148.86 8989.19 107870.26
Step G 53.4165 4273.32 9258.86 111106.32
Step H 55.0190 4401.52 9536.63 114439.52
Step I 56.6695 4533.56 9822.71 117872.56
Step J 58.3697 4669.58 10117.41 121408.98
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9175B Water Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-B
Step A 49.7784 3982.27 8628.26 103539.07
Step B 52.6599 4212.79 9127.72 109532.59
Step C 54.2397 4339.18 9401.55 112818.58
Step D 55.8669 4469.35 9683.60 116203.15
Step E 57.5428 4603.42 9974.09 119689.02
Step F 59.2691 4741.53 10273.31 123279.73
Step G 61.0472 4883.78 10581.51 126978.18
Step H 62.8785 5030.28 10898.94 130787.28
Step I 64.7649 5181.19 11225.92 134710.99
Step J 66.7080 5336.64 11562.72 138752.64
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
MGMT Management
City of Roseville
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9244B Water Utility Manager-B Step A 66.8492 5347.94 11587.19 139046.34 Step B 70.7182 5657.46 12257.82 147093.86
Step C 72.8398 5827.18 12625.57 151506.78
Step D 75.0251 6002.01 13004.35 156052.21
Step E 77.2759 6182.07 13394.49 160733.87
Step F 79.5942 6367.54 13796.33 165555.94
Step G 81.9819 6558.55 14210.20 170522.35
Step H 84.4414 6755.31 14636.51 175638.11
Step I 86.9746 6957.97 15075.60 180907.17
Step J 89.5838 7166.70 15527.86 186334.30
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024
Appendix:F
Effective Date:09/21/2024

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3532
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
Title:

Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project – New Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Approve the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project, the Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project, and
2 .

Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of $500,000 to reduce the budget in the Cooperative Potable Water Transmission Infrastructure Project and re-appropriate the funds to the new Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project in the Water Construction Fund.

BACKGROUND
On May 7, 2020, the City entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Placer County Water Agency for exploration of shared water conveyance infrastructure for added water supply reliability. One potential project that has emerged is a treated water pipeline from PCWA's foothills water treatment plant to an intertie with the City of Roseville.

This project provides funding to conduct a feasibility assessment, to determine if this project concept (to convey treated water from Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) Pressure Zone 1 and deliver water to a potential future intertie with the City of Roseville's Water Distribution system in Pressure Zone 2) is feasible. If this project is deemed feasible and implemented, it would increase water supply reliability in all hydrologic water year types. A separate future City Council action will be required for moving into the installation/construction phase of the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment of $500,000 will reduce the budget in the Cooperative Potable Water Transmission Infrastructure Project, which has an existing budget of $2,100,000, and re-appropriate those funds to the new Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project.

The Cooperative Potable Water Transmission Infrastructure Project will then be left with a total budget of $1,600,000. There is no impact to the fund balance in the Water Construction Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to feasibility and planning studies for possible future actions which the agency has not approved or funded (CEQA Guidelines §15262). Because the Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project only authorizes feasibility and planning studies it is statutorily exempt from CEQA review. Following completion of these studies the City and/or participating entities will refine the project proposal and conduct CEQA review prior to project approval. If the City choses to move forward with the design and construction phases of the work, and we will follow all required CEQA requirements at that time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Gainey, Principal Engineer
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6865
ORDINANCE NO. 6865

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

6120

5301

84001

500543

500,000
Increase professional services to establish a new
Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project
(500543) budget

6120

6587

84001

500147

(500,000) Decrease capital outlay in Cooperative Potable Water Transmission Infrastructure Project (500147)

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL -

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -

NET ADJUSTMENT -

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000

FUND BALANCE TOTAL -

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

This item requests Council adopt a resolution approving a new Capital Improvement Project, the Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project, and approving a budget adjustment of $500,000. Funds will be reduced from Project 500147, the Cooperative Potable Water Trans mission Infrastructure Project and reappropriated to the new project 500543 in the Water Construction Fund (6120) as the project manager wishes to break this project into two projects. This new project provides funding to conduct a feasibility assessment to determine the feasibility of conveying treated water from Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) Pressure Zone 1 and delivering it to a potential future intertie with the City of Roseville's water distribution system in Pressure Zone 2. If this project is deemed feasible and implemented, it would increase water supply reliability in all hydrologic water year types. A separate future City Council action will be required for moving into the installation/construction phase of the project. There is no impact on the Water Construction Fund balance (6120).

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Janice Gainey, Principal Engineer FISCAL YEAR: 2024-25 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Linda York, EU Business Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 09/18/24 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: EU Water ORDINANCE:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3538
File #:
0900-02-02-1 & 0201-01
Title:

Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Pond Levee Federal Emergency Management Agency Letter of Map Revision – Non-Capital Multi-Year Project Approval and Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Approve the establishment of a new Non-Capital Multi-Year Project, the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Pond Levee Federal Emergency Management Agency Letter of Map Revision Project; and
2 .

Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $200,000 using available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.

BACKGROUND
The objective of this project is to prepare a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding a levee relocation project that was previously constructed at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP). The levee is part of the southern perimeter of the flow equalization ponds at the DCWWTP.

The LOMR process involves collaborating with FEMA to address agency requirements needed to update the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. This will include hydraulic modeling to assess how the levee affects the simulated flood conditions. Additionally, it will involve tasks related to levee accreditation to verify that the levee meets all necessary criteria for inclusion on the NFIP map. The successful completion of this project will ensure that the updated FEMA NFIP map accurately reflects the current status of the levee.

FISCAL IMPACT
The requested budget adjustment of $200,000 includes initiation of the project with $175,000 for professional services, and $25,000 for the projected cost of internal project labor. The requested project budget is from available resources in the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to feasibility and planning studies for possible future actions which the agency has not approved or funded (CEQA Guidelines §15262). Because the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Pond Levee Federal Emergency Management Agency Letter of Map Revision Project only authorizes feasibility and planning studies it is statutorily exempt from CEQA review.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Manager
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6867
ORDINANCE NO. 6867

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Pond Levee Federal Emergency Management Agency Letter of Map Revision project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

6231

5301

84001

500547

150,000 Establish professional services budget for project #500547 DCWWTP Pond Levee FEMA LOMR

6231

5080

84001

500547 50,000 Establish internal labor budget for project #500547 DCWWTP Pond Levee FEMA LOMR

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 200,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -

NET ADJUSTMENT 200,000

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 6231 3601 00000 000000 (200,000) Reduce available resources in the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (200,000)

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

Staff recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Non-Capital Multi-Year Project – the DCWWTP Pond Levee FEMA LOMR, and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $200,000 in the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund (6231) to the Project. The objective of this project is to prepare a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding a levee relocation project that was constructed at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP). The levee is part of the southern perimeter of the flow equalization ponds at the DCWWTP. The LOMR process involves collaborating with FEMA to address agency requirements needed to update the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. This will include hydraulic modeling to assess how the levee affects the simulated flood conditions. Additionally, it is expected to involve tasks related to levee accreditation to verify that the levee meets all necessary criteria for inclusion on the NFIP map. The successful completion of this project will ensure that the updated FEMA NFIP map accurately reflects the current status of the levee.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Arashdeep Singh, Senior Engineer FISCAL YEAR: 2024-25 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Linda York, EU Business Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 09/18/24 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: EU/Wastewater ORDINANCE:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3541
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
Title:

Vactor Washout Station Project - Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment that will appropriate $189,000 from the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund and $121,000 from the Water Rehabilitation Fund to the Vactor Washout Station Project for a total budget adjustment of $310,000.

BACKGROUND
The project involves designing and constructing an improved Vactor Washout station at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to be used by both the Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution teams. This station will replace the current unpaved, poorly lit, temporary area used for vactor truck washouts by providing a paved surface, improved drainage and wastewater capture systems, and enhanced lighting for safety. These upgrades will enhance operational efficiency, safety, and environmental compliance.

FISCAL IMPACT
The existing project budget is $55,000. The requested budget adjustment of $310,000 includes approximately $65,000 for professional services to fully cover the cost of the design, and approximately $245,000 for the projected cost of internal project labor, capital outlay and expenses. The Wastewater Rehabilitation additional portion is $189,000 and the Water Rehabilitation portion is $121,000. Both funds have available resources for the requested budget adjustment. With the recommended budget adjustment, the total project budget will be $365,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the minor alteration of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Manager
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6868
CEQA Notice of Exemption
ORDINANCE NO. 6868

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Vactor Washout Station project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 6230 5080 84001 500146 75,520 Increase internal project labor budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
6230 5301 84001 500146 43,487 Increase professional services budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
6230 5395 84001 500146 24,400 Increase equipment budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
6230 6587 84001 500146 45,593 Increase capital outlay budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
6130 5080 84001 500146 39,930 Increase internal project labor budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
6130 5301 84001 500146 21,743 Increase professional services budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
6130 5395 84001 500146 12,100 Increase equipment budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
6130 6587 84001 500146 47,227 Increase capital outlay budget for project #500146 Vactor Washout Station
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 310,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -

NET ADJUSTMENT 310,000

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 6230 3601 00000 000000 (189,000) Reduce available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund
6130 3601 00000 000000 (121,000) Reduce available resources in the Water Rehabilitation Fund
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (310,000)

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

Staff recommends that City Council adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment that will appropriate $189,000 from the W astewater Rehabilitation Fund (6230) and $121,000 from the Water Rehabilitation Fund (6130) to the Vactor Washout Station Project ( 500146) for a total budget adjustment of $310,000.The project involves designing and constructing a new vactor washout station at the Dry Creek Wastewat er Treatment Plant, serving both the Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution teams. This station wi ll replace the current unpaved and poorly -lit temporary area and provide a paved surface, improved drainage and wastewater capture systems, and enhanced lighting for safety. These upgrades w ill enhance operational efficiency, safety, and environmental comp liance. The new project total will be $365,000. There are available resources in both the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund and Water Rehabilitation Fund.

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: Vactor Washout Station Project

Project Location(s): 1800 Booth Road, Roseville, CA 95747. Assessor’s Parcel Number s 474- 080-009-000, 474-110-001-000, 474-110-002-000, 473-080-000-000, and 473-080-002-000.

Project Description : The Environmental Utilities Department is requesting approval to design and constructed an improved Vactor Washout station located in the northwest corner of the Dry Creek Wastew ater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) facility . This station will replace the current unpaved, poorly lit temporary area used for vactor truck washouts by providing a paved surface, improved drainage and wastewater capture systems, and enhanced lighting for safety. These upgrades will enhance operational efficiency, safety, and environmental compliance. The project would not result in an expansion of use.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 1 (Existing Facilities) consists of … minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use.”

The project consists of improvements to a portion of the DCWWTP property to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and environmental compliance of an existing maintenance area for vactor trucks. The project would not result in expansion of use. Consequently , the Class 1 and Categorical Exemption applies.

Lead Agency Contact Person : Arashdeep Singh, Roseville Department of Environmental Utilities (916) 746-1854.

Signature: Date: 8/22/2024
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3542
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
Title:

Wastewater Collections Easement Machine with Trailer and Utility Broom for Compact Track Loader – Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff requests that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment for $120,472.74 to fund the purchase of an easement machine with a trailer and a utility broom for an existing compact track loader to be used by Wastewater Collections to address planned and unplanned repair and rehabilitation work to existing infrastructure.

BACKGROUND
Wastewater Collections performs both routine and emergency repairs and rehabilitation to the City's existing infrastructure. This work includes repair and replacement of failed sewer mains, manholes, and laterals. The work undertaken to perform these tasks often requires significant impacts to existing roadways and sidewalks. There can be challenges getting to specific manholes based on the location. The easement machine with trailer and utility broom for the existing compact track loader will provide added efficiency for the work performed by the Wastewater Collections crew.

The Public Works Department’s Fleet Management Division is making the purchases as the recommended equipment is considered to be part of the City’s vehicle fleet. The easement machine with trailer and utility broom for the existing compact track loader will be purchased through the Fleet Replacement Fund so a budget adjustment is required to transfer funds from the Wastewater Operations Fund to increase Fleet’s appropriations authority.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment appropriates $120,472.74 of available resources in the Wastewater Operations Fund for a payment to the City’s Fleet Replacement Fund. The payment includes $110,268.65 for the easement machine purchase, $8,204.09 for the utility broom purchase for the existing compact track loader, and a fee of $1,000 for each item for Fleet Maintenance’s cost associated with vehicle preparation and decals. These vehicles will be purchased in the Fleet Replacement Fund. There will be no net impact to that fund since the recommended budget adjustment will increase both its revenue and expenditure budgets by $120,472.74.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Manager
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6869
ORDINANCE NO. 6869

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the purchase of a wastewater collections easement machine with trailer and utility broom for compact track loader.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

6201

5516

74330

120,473
Establish expenditure budget (automotive - vehicle
shortage) to buy an Easement Machine with Trailer and
Broom for Wastewater Collections

4005

6552

62601

120,473
Establish expenditure budget (capital outlay - vehicles) in the Fleet Replacement Fund to purchase an Easement
Machine with Trailer and Broom for Wastewater
Collections

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 240,946

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

4005

4254

62601

120,473
Establish revenue budget (internal service charges -
vehicle shortage) in the Fleet Replacement Fund to
purchase an Easement Machine with Trailer and Broom
for Wastewater Collections.

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 120,473

NET ADJUSTMENT 120,473

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 6201 3601 00000 000000 (120,473) Decrease Wastewater Operations Fund balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (120,473)

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The recommended budget adjustment will appropriate $120,473 of available resources in the Wastewater Operations Fund (6201) for a payment to the Fleet Replacement Fund (4005) for an easement machine with trailer and broom for Wastewater Collections. In December 2023, there was a significant sanitary sewer overflow event in an open space area for which Wastewater Collections had to rent an easement machine to access manholes. Based on the success of using this vehicle/equipment and sometime after the development of the FY2025 budget, Wastewater Collections staff determined they should purchase their own easement machine.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Utility Manager FISCAL YEAR: 2024-25 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Linda York, EU Business Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 09/18/24 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: EU/Wastewater ORDINANCE:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3535
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
Title:

Sewer Routing Alternatives Analysis Project – Non-Capital Multi-Year Project Approval and Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.14.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the establishment of a new Non-Capital Multi- Year Project, the Sewer Routing Alternatives Analysis Project, and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $50,000 using available resources in the Wastewater Construction Fund.

BACKGROUND
This project provides funding for an alternatives analysis related to future sewer routing to the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP). Anticipated developments west of the treatment plant will require sewer conveyance to the PGWWTP. Currently, there is no coordinated approach among these developments, which could lead to the installation of multiple force mains, including redundant ones, potentially resulting in up to ten force mains along Blue Oaks Blvd. The objective of this study is to gather existing information and assess potential alternatives that may better serve the long-term interests of both the City and Placer County.

FISCAL IMPACT
The requested budget adjustment of $50,000 includes initiation of the project with approximately $45,000 for professional services, and $5,000 for the projected cost of internal project labor. The requested project budget is from available resources in the Wastewater Construction Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to feasibility and planning studies, as they address potential future actions that have not yet been approved or funded by the agency (CEQA Guidelines §15262). Since the Sewer Routing Alternatives Analysis is a planning study, it is statutorily exempt from CEQA review. Upon completion of this study and before implementing any recommended projects, the City and/or participating entities will conduct the required CEQA review.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Manager
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6866
ORDINANCE NO. 6866

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Sewer Routing Alternatives Analysis project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

6220

5301

84001

500546

45,000 Increase professional services budget for project #500546 Sewer Routing Alternative Analysis Project

6220

5080

84001

500546

5,000 Increase internal labor budget for project #500546 Sewer Routing Alternative Analysis Project

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 50,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -

NET ADJUSTMENT 50,000

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 6220 3601 00000 000000 (50,000) Reduce available resources in the Wastewater Construction Fund
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (50,000)

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

Staff recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Non-Capital Multi-Year Project – the Sewer Routing Alternative Analysis Project, and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $50,000 in the Wastewater Construction Fund (6220) to the Project. This project provides funding for an alternatives analysis related to future sewer routing to the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP). Anticipated developments west of the treatment plant will require sewer conveyance to the PGWWTP. Currently, there is no coordinated approach among these developments, which could lead to the installation of multiple force mains, including redundant ones, potentially resulting in up to ten force mains along Blue Oaks Blvd. The objective of this study is to gather existing information and assess potential alternatives that may better serve the long -term interests of both the City and Placer County.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3544
File #:
0702-02 & 0201-01
Title:

Woodcreek Golf Course Bunker Renovation Project – Budget Adjustment Contact:

Rob Nakamura 916 774 5135 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment to reduce the Woodcreek Golf Facility Renovation and Restoration project by $707,033 and re- appropriate the funds to the Woodcreek Golf Club Bunker Renovation project.

BACKGROUND
In August 2024, staff recommended and received approval from Council to award a contract to Landscapes Unlimited, LLC to complete the first phase of the Woodcreek Golf Course Bunker Renovation Project. There are currently two approved projects identified to fund and complete the required bunker renovations. Staff requests to reduce the Woodcreek Golf Facility and Renovation Project by $707,033 and re-appropriate the funds to the Woodcreek Golf Course Bunker Renovation Project to consolidate funds to a single project. The new project total for the Woodcreek Golf Course Bunker Renovation Project will be $1,107,033.

FISCAL IMPACT
This budget adjustment re-appropriates $707,033 from the Woodcreek Golf Course Facility Renovations and Restoration project to the Woodcreek Golf Club Bunker Renovation project for a new project total of $1,107,033. Both projects are funded within the Golf Course Fund, with no impact on the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not
subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D – Enhance economic vitality
Goal E – Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F – Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Rob Nakamura, Recreation Superintendent
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6871
ORDINANCE NO. 6871

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2024-25, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Woodcreek Golf Club Bunker Renovation project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 5/24/2024
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

2594

6587

84001

500394

707,033 Increase project budget - Woodcreek Golf Club Bunker Renovation (500394)

2594

5411

84001

500297

(707,033) Decrease project budget - FY2022-23 Woodcreek Golf Facility Renovations and Restoration project (500297)

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL -

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -

NET ADJUSTMENT -

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000

FUND BALANCE TOTAL -

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Parks, Recreation & Libraries department is requesting a budget adjustment to reduce the FY2022-23 Woodcreek Golf Facility Renovations and Restoration project (500297) by $707,033 and re-appropriate the funds to the Woodcreek Golf Club Bunker Renovation project (500394). Funding for bunker renovation was initially appropriated in the FY2022-23 Woodcreek Golf Facility Renovations and Restoration project (500297).

This action will consolidate project funding to a single project totaling $1,107,033 and close the FY2022-23 Woodcreek Golf Facility Renovations and Restoration project (500297). There is no impact on the General Fund.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Rob Nakamura, Recreation Superintendent FISCAL YEAR: 2024-25 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Scott Marchetti, Management Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 09/18/24 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Recreation, and Libraries ORDINANCE:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3549
File #:
0704
Title:

Second Reading - Roseville Municipal Code Addition – Temporary Memorials Contact:

Jill Geller 916-774-5249 [email protected]
My Tien Doan 916-774-5325 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 6874 ADDING CHAPTER 13.14 OF TITLE 13 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TEMPORARY MEMORIALS, for second reading and adoption.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not applicable.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F – Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
My Tien Doan, Deputy City Attorney
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6874
ORDINANCE NO. 6874

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ADDING CHAPTER

13.14 OF TITLE 13 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING TEMPORARY MEMORIALS

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 13.14 is hereby added to Title 13 of the Roseville Municipal Code to read as follows:

Chapter 13.14

TEMPORARY MEMORIALS
Sections:

13.14.010 Purpose.

13.14.020 Definitions.

13.14.030 Duration of temporary memorials.

13.14.040 Physical restrictions of temporary memorials.

13.14.050 Unauthorized or unsafe displays; Immediate removal.

13.14.060 Abandoned property; Removal, storage and disposal.

13.14.070 Posted notice prior to removal.

13.14.080 Temporary memorials on private property.

13.14.090 Penalties for violations.

13.14.100 Severability.

13.14.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare by regulating temporary memorials on public property. Specifically, this chapter is intended to:

A. Afford citizens a reasonable opportunity to express their grief and condolences when tragedies occur;

B. Establish the acceptable duration and contents of temporary memorials;

C. Reduce hazards to the general public, city personnel, and public property;

D. Enhance and protect the physical appearance of the city; and

E. Allow the city to properly and safely maintain public rights-of-way, streets, sidewalks, easements or other areas of thoroughfare, parks, trails, and other public property.

13.14.020 Definitions.

2 For purposes of this chapter, the following words shall have the meanings set forth in this section:

A. “Public property” means any public street, right-of-way, sidewalk, curb, easement or thoroughfare, alleyway, parking lot or parking garage, park, trail, open space, or other property owned or controlled by the city.

B. “Temporary memorial” means the placement, at or near the site of a tragic event, of a single item or collection of items, including but not limited to real or plastic flowers, crosses, or other mementos made of any materials, in memory of, or as a tribute to, a victim of a tragic event.

13.14.030 Duration of temporary memorials.

Any temporary memorial placed on public property shall be allowed to remain for no more than forty-five (45) days from the date on which the incident giving rise to the temporary memorial occurred. The city shall have the sole discretion to remove the temporary memorial at any time thereafter.

13.14.040 Physical restrictions of temporary memorials.

A temporary memorial shall be no more than thirty (30) inches in height, measured from the paved surface, two (2) feet in width, measured along the roadway or sidewalk, and one (1) foot in depth, measured perpendicular to the roadway or sidewalk.

13.14.050 Unauthorized or unsafe displays; Immediate removal.

The city reserves the right to immediately remove and dispose of a temporary memorial prior to the expiration of the 45-day period, without notice of any kind or liability to any person or entity, upon a determination that a temporary memorial violates any of the following standards:

A. Temporary memorials shall not create hazards to the general public, city personnel, or others, including, but not limited to, pose a distraction to motorists; obstruct sight lines for motorists or pedestrians, including in the Clear Vision Triangle (See Chapter 19.95, Definitions); or obstruct the free movement of motorists or pedestrians on any public street, sidewalk, or bike lane.

B. Temporary memorials shall not threaten the surrounding property, including, but not limited to, by having flammable material.

C. Temporary memorials shall not interfere with routine maintenance activities of the city, such as landscaping, mowing, irrigation, painting, tree removal, or related activities.

Memorials shall not be allowed in any permitted construction or maintenance work zone.

D. Temporary memorials shall not cause any type of damage to public property or 3 any personal property located on public property, including, without limitation, trees, signs, or traffic control devices.

E. Temporary memorials shall not emit music and/or amplified sound.

F. Temporary memorials shall not damage or deface public property or be permanently affixed to the site.

G. Temporary memorials shall not be constructed from, contain, or include any glass items, including, but not limited to, picture frames, bottles, and candles, or any other item with or containing the potential for, an open flame.

H. Temporary memorials shall not include any drugs or alcohol, or contain vulgar or obscene language or images.

13.14.060 Abandoned property; Removal, storage, and disposal.

A. All items placed at a temporary memorial that remain after the 45-day period shall be considered abandoned, shall immediately become the property of the city, and may be removed and disposed of in any manner in the city’s sole discretion.

B. All perishable items, including, but not limited to, food and flowers, shall be discarded. All nonperishable items will be placed for storage at the city’s Corporation Yard under the direction and supervision of the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department. Items collected by the city will be released to family member(s) of the temporary memorial honoree upon written request. All items will be discarded by the city if not claimed within thirty (30) calendar days of storage.

13.14.070 Posted notice prior to removal.

Prior to the removal of a temporary memorial, but no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the removal of the temporary memorial or the expiration of the 45-day period, whichever is later, the city shall post in a conspicuous place near the temporary memorial a notice reading substantially as follows:

“CITY OF ROSEVILLE

NOTICE OF INTENT TO

REMOVE AND DISCARD TEMPORARY MEMORIAL

(RMC Chapter 13.14)

In order to provide an avenue to memorialize or pay tribute to victims of tragic accidents, while at the same time helping to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community, temporary memorials are permitted on public property for up to 45 calendar da ys from the date o n which the incident occurred that gave rise to the temporary memorial, or the date on which the city received notice, whichever is later. Thereafter, all items are considered 4 abandoned, become the property of the city and may be removed and disposed of in any manner in the city’s sole discretion.

Persons who place any item at a temporary memorial are unequivocally indicating that they do not intend to retain the item and that it may be discarded by the city. The city shall not be resp onsible for the lo ss or theft of any item placed at a temporary memorial.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on or after _______ (“Removal Date’), the city will remove and dispose of all items that comprise or are a part of this temporary memorial. Any person who wishes to recover any item that comprises or is a part of this temporary memorial should remove such item prior to the Removal Date. Items remaining after the Removal Date shall be considered abandoned property, shall become the property of the city, a nd may be removed and disposed of in any manner in the city’s sole discretion.”

The city manager or his/her designee is authorized to approve revisions to this notice, so long as the notice remains consistent with the terms of this chapter.

13.14.080 Temporary memorials on private property.

Temporary memorials are prohibited on private property without the consent of the property owner.

13.14.090 Penalties for violation.

Violation of any provision of this chapter may be charged as an administrative citation, infraction, or misdemeanor, at the discretion of the City Attorney.

13.14.100 Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are hereby declared to be severable. If any provision, clause, word, sentence, or paragraph of this chapter or the application thereof to any person, establishment, or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or application of this chapter.

SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

5 AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3534
File #:
0106-04
Title:

League of California Cities Annual Conference 2024 - Designation of Voting Delegate
Contact:

Mark Wolinski 916-774-5179 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.17.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint by motion, Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer, as the voting delegate and Scott Pettingell, Assistant Finance Director, as the alternate voting delegate to the League of California Cities business meeting of the General Assembly.

BACKGROUND
The League of California Cities Annual Conference is being held October 16-18, 2024, in Long Beach, CA. The annual business meeting will be held on Friday, October 18, 2024, when the membership takes action on resolutions that establish League policy.

In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate. The 2024 Annual Conference Voting Delegate is then filed with the League through the online submission portal by Wednesday, September 25, 2024, to confirm the voting and alternative delegate. The League Designated voting delegates registered to attend the Annual Conference constitute the League's General Assembly. Voting during the business meeting is an important aspect of the conference where the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness, and vitality of local government in California.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost for registration, lodging, and flight is approximately $1650 per delegate and the funds were approved in the City’s
fiscal year 2024-25 General Fund
budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. This action meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Wolinski, Government Relations Administrator
Megan Scheid, Deputy City Manager

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3539
File #:
0704-01
Title:

FD-51 Neighborhood Park - Master Plan Approval
Contact:

Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 7.18.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the master plan for the FD-51 Neighborhood Park site.

BACKGROUND
Location
This 1.12-acre neighborhood park is located off of Earl Rush Dr. at Market St. in Sierra Vista. This park backs up to an open space/drainage area.

Budget
The total budget for this park is $702,000. When considering the costs for design, engineering, permitting and inspections, the budget for actual construction is approximately $550,000.

Public Outreach
The public outreach included a virtual workshop held in January 2024, an in-person workshop held in March 2024, and a two-week write-in period in June 2024.

The identified priorities provided by residents indicated a small grass area for curb appeal, a shaded seating area, more trees and to keep it natural. Play areas and active recreation spaces were preferred to be planned for other nearby park areas.

During the write-in period, 6 people wrote in with 5 in support of the plan and 1 suggesting that the grass area be located in the back of the park adjacent to the open space/drainage area.

Switching the location of the grass area would be problematic. Neighbors wanted the grass to be more visible, creating a clean, aesthetic look or curb appeal for the neighborhood. Also, since the open space/drainage area is adjacent to the park site, preventing chemicals such as fertilizer and pre/post emergent from entering into the drainage system would be a concern. The undeveloped or more natural space between the grass area and open space/drainage provides a natural filter to ensure any water entering into the drainage way is clean. The undeveloped portion of the park site would also offer a nice transition between developed and undeveloped land. A short fence is proposed to be located at the back of the sidewalk.

Proposed Master Plan
The proposed master plan includes a small grass area, connecting walkways, a shaded seating/picnic area, undeveloped space with trees, irrigation, fencing and natural pathways.

Parks & Recreation Commission
The Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the master plan at its August 5, 2024 meeting and approved the plan to be forwarded to the Council for formal approval.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the park was approved in FY2023-24 for design and in FY2024-25 for construction, with the budgets appropriated in the Sierra Vista Neighborhood Park Fund. Maintenance costs will be covered through the Sierra Vista Community Facilities District No. 2 (Public Services). There will be no General Fund impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the FD-51 Neighborhood Park Master Plan was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (certified May 5, 2010, SCH No. 2008032115), and identified in the associated Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Based on results of an initial study, construction of the FD-51 Neighborhood Park Master Plan is found to be within the scope of the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR. As discussed in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analyses of community infrastructure and facilities, including parks, sidewalks, and bike trails, to the extent applicable. Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the FD-51 Neighborhood Park Master Plan. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in Section 15183 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no additional CEQA review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning & Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Vicinity Map
FD-51 Master Plan

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:

File #:

Title:

Consent Calendar
Contact:

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3553
File #:
0800-03
Title:

Renewable Energy - Transaction Confirmation and Credit Support Addendum Contact:

Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 8.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Transaction Confirmation - Bundled RECs and Resource Adequacy Capacity Products for a

10.5-year transaction for renewable energy with Shell Energy North America, L.P.

Staff also recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Amendment to WSPP Agreement Support Addendum (Amendment No. 1) with Shell Energy North America, L.P. that increases credit limits for both parties for high investment grade ratings.

BACKGROUND
The State of California’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS) legislation requires electric utilities to increase the amount of energy they receive from renewable sources to 60% by 2030.

To meet this RPS requirement, Roseville Electric Utility conducted a competitive solicitation and evaluated various types of offers from several bidders. This transaction with Shell Energy North America, L.P. is a ten-and-a-half-year purchase of renewable energy and renewable energy credits from qualifying solar and wind facilities located in California and Oregon. The transaction provides renewable energy at a fixed price of $73.50 per MWh and will deliver firm quantities of energy (approximately 100,000 Renewable Energy Credits per year) between January 1, 2028 and June 30, 2038 and will fulfill 9% of Roseville’s renewable needs (and 18% of Product Content Category 1 renewable needs) for compliance period 6 and beyond (2028 - 2038). Staff plans to bring additional transactions to City Council in the future to help Roseville meet its remaining renewable portfolio obligations.

The Credit Support Annex (CSA) provides an industry-standard framework that enhances credit protections for both parties. It outlines the terms and conditions under which collateral is posted to secure obligations, ensuring that the City is protected in case of default or credit events. This agreement mitigates financial risk, supports transactions with Shell Energy North America, and aligns with evolving market conditions. The original CSA was established in October 2010, and this amendment, which increases the credit limits for both parties from $15,000,000 to $25,000,000 for high investment-grade ratings, reflects the improved financial standing of both parties and the need to accommodate larger transactions while maintaining robust credit safeguards.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of the transaction is $77,175,000, or approximately $7,350,000 annually. Funding will be included in future Electric Fund budgets (initially in FY2027-28) and will be contingent upon approval of the City Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of these contracts meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E – Deliver exceptional city services.

Respectfully Submitted,
Petra Wallace, Power Supply and Portfolio Administrator Dan Beans, Electric Utility Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-330
SENA_PCC1
Resolution 24-331
Amendment
RESOLUTION NO. 24-330

APPROVING A TRANSACTION CONFIRMATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, the State of California’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS) legislation requires electric utilities to increase the amount of energy they receive from renewable sources to 60% by 2030; and

WHEREAS, to meet this RPS requirement, Roseville Electric Utility conducted a competitive solicitation and evaluated various types of offers from several bidders; and

WHEREAS, the Transaction Confirmation, Bundled RECs and Resource Adequacy Capacity Products (Transaction Confirmation), with Shell Energy North America, L.P. is a ten- and-a-half-year purchase of renewable energy and renewable energy credits from qualifying solar and wind facilities located in California and Oregon.

WHEREAS, the Transaction Confirmation, has been reviewed by the Council;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Transaction Confirmation is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk
FINAL

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}1

Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.

City of Roseville Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.

Contract ID: Contract ID:

Deal Maker: Deal Maker: Rick Kunz
Phone: Phone: 503.504.9505
Fax: Email: [email protected]

TRANSACTION CONFIRMATION
Bundled RECs and
Resource Adequacy Capacity Products

This Confirmation (this “Confirmation”) is entered into this ________, ___, 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between City of Roseville, California, a duly chartered city under the laws of the State of California, which owns and operates a municipal electric utility system engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution, purchase and sale of electric power and energy at wholesale and retail, (“Roseville or “Buyer”) and Shell Energy North America (US), L.P. (“Shell Energy” or “Seller”), each referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”, regarding the purchase and sale of the Products defined herein below under the terms and conditions below. Additional definitions are included under the “Definitions / Interpretations” section below.

Transaction:

Seller: Shell Energy

Buyer: City of Roseville (WREGIS Account Holder Name:__________ Account ID _________)

Master Agreement:This Confirmation shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the WSPP Agreement, version dated effective September 11, 2023, promulgated by WSPP, Inc. (as amended from time to time, the “Master Agreement”), such terms and conditions are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth in this Confirmation, including but not limited to Schedule C and Schedule R of the Master Agreement (“Schedule C” and “Schedule R”, respectively).

The Master Agreement, including Schedule C and Schedule R, shall govern this REC Transaction, except as modified in this Confirmation. References herein to sections in Schedule C or Schedule R shall appear, for example, as “Section R-2.3.2”. References in Schedule R to “Renewable Energy Facility” shall be interpreted as references to a Project (as defined below) in this Confirmation.

Project: As used herein, “Projects” shall mean any generation facility that qualifies as an ERR (as defined below) and that satisfies the other requirements of this Confirmation.

Products: As used herein, “Product” shall mean each of (a) and (b) below:

(a) Firm Bundled RECs (as defined in Section R-2.3.2 of Schedule R) consisting of energy produced hourly by one or more Projects according to the hourly schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 that is simultaneously bundled with the RECs generated therefrom, which qualifies as (i) Portfolio Content Category 1 (as defined in the

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}2
Portfolio Content Category section of Part 1 below), and (ii) under the California Long Term Contracting Requirements (as defined below).

(b) RA Product (as defined in Part 2 below).

Contract
Quantity of
Firm Bundled RECs:The Contract Quantity for the Firm Bundled REC portion of the Product shall be 97,391 MWh and associated bundled RECs per calendar year of the Delivery Term, except for leap years where the Contract Quantity shall be 97,591 MWh and associated bundled RECs per calendar year.

Contract Price: The Contract Price for each MWh of Product delivered to Buyer is $73.50 per MWh (i.e., per REC). The Contract Price is inclusive of the RA Product portion of the Product described below.

Delivery Term: The delivery term for Product under this Confirmation shall commence January 1, 2028 and continue through June 30, 2038, inclusive, (the “Delivery Term”); provided that the RECs attributable to the energy generated during the Delivery Term but created after the Delivery Term shall be transferred to and paid for by Buyer in accordance with the terms of this Confirmation.

Energy Delivery Point: CAISO NP15 Trading Hub (the “Energy Delivery Point”)

Firm Bundled
REC Delivery: Seller shall deliver the Firm Bundled REC portion of the Product by (i) delivering the Contract Quantity of energy on an hourly basis to the CAISO on behalf of Buyer at the Energy Delivery Point in accordance with the CAISO requirements and procedures, and (ii) transferring the RECs with associated NERC e-Tags (if any) through WREGIS to Buyer’s designated WREGIS account(s) as described below.

REC Transfer: Seller will transfer the RECs purchased and sold hereunder to Buyer’s WREGIS account on an annual basis no later than May 1stof the year following the year in which the energy to which such RECs are attributable was generated.

Settlement Date: Payments shall be made monthly in accordance with Section 9.2 of the Master Agreement.

Invoices will include the calculation of amounts set forth therein and associated information, including but not limited to the hourly quantity of energy delivered during the relevant month.

Energy Scheduling: The Contract Quantity of energy will be scheduled hourly by Seller to Buyer at the Energy Delivery Point via an Inter-SC Trade as defined by and pursuant to the procedures of CAISO.

Seller will perform all scheduling and tagging requirements as may be applicable to the transaction contemplated hereunder. Shell shall perform such activities consistent with all applicable CAISO and WECC Scheduling Protocols. If applicable, Seller shall be the electricity importer for purposes of California Global Warming Solutions Act and associated Regulation for the California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms.
{D0567907.DOCX / 1}3
Transmission: Any reference to transmission means the transmission provided through CAISO and any and all arrangements for transmission required to be made in connection with the Products shall be arranged through CAISO.

PART 1 – ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS RESPECTING RECS
Environmental
Attributes: The only Environmental Attributes conveyed under this Confirmation as part of the Product are Program Attributes (as described in Section 2.4.2 of Schedule R) under the Applicable Program, which for purposes of this Confirmation is the California Renewables Portfolio Standard (as defined in the Definitions section hereof).

Applicable
Program: Subject to the provisions regarding “Change in Law” below, (i) each Project from which the Firm Bundled RECs portion of the Product is generated shall qualify during the Delivery Term as an ERR under the California Renewables Portfolio Standard, and (ii) the RECs transferred hereunder shall meet the California RPS requirements for compliance pursuant to California Utilities Code Section 399.16(b)(1) (“Portfolio Content Category 1” or “PCC1”).

Supporting Data: In the event that any RECs transferred from Seller to Buyer hereunder originate from a Project outside of the state of California, Seller shall provide Buyer all reasonably requested supporting documentation and reconciliation data required under the California RPS, including, without limitation, hourly meter data, tag data and associated calculations of the lesser of each by hour for each vintage month of the RECs transferred hereunder.

Compliance
With RPS: Subject to the provisions regarding “Change in Law” below, Seller represents and warrants to Buyer during the Delivery Term that the purchase and sale of Product pursuant to this Confirmation is a resale and meets the following additional requirements:

(i) the contracts held by Seller pursuant to which Seller purchases the Product sold to Buyer hereunder meet the PCC1 compliance criteria under the California RPS;

(ii) the Product meets the requirements set forth in PUC Code 399.16(b)(1)(A) and the RPS compliance requirements for Portfolio Content Category 1;

(iii) this Confirmation transfers only energy and RECs that have not yet been generated prior to the Effective Date of this Confirmation;
(iv) in connection with the transfer of the energy and associated RECs that comprise the Firm Bundled REC portion of the Product purchased and sold under this Confirmation, the energy transferred by this Confirmation is transferred to Buyer in real-time via sale by Seller to, and purchase by Buyer from, CAISO; and (v) if applicable, the energy is scheduled from one or more ERRs that are not interconnected to a California balancing authority into a California balancing authority without substituting electricity from another source, and the original hourly or subhourly schedule is maintained.

Additional Representations
and Warranties:

Seller represents and warrants to Buyer during the Delivery Term that:
{D0567907.DOCX / 1}4
(i) the Product will be sourced solely from the Projects; (ii) Seller has the right to sell the Product from the Projects; (iii) Seller has not sold the Product or any component thereof to be transferred to Buyer to any third party;
(iv) the energy component of the Product produced by a Project and purchased by Seller for resale to Buyer hereunder is not being sold by Seller back to the Project or any owner of the Project from which it was generated;
(v) Seller shall deliver the Product free and clear of all liens or other encumbrances; (vi) Seller will deliver to Buyer all energy and associated RECs generated by the Project pursuant to this Confirmation in compliance with the California Long Term Contracting Requirements.

Buyer represents and warrants to Seller during the Delivery Term that Buyer has or will have a WREGIS account to receive the RECs to be transferred from Seller to Buyer prior to the first delivery under this Confirmation.

Change in Law
Provisions: If there is a Change in Law occurring after the Effective Date that results (i) in the failure of the Product to qualify as PCC1 or otherwise meet the requirements of the California RPS or California Long Term Contracting Requirements, (ii) in a Party’s performance of any obligation under this Confirmation (in whole or in part) becoming illegal, unenforceable, or impossible, (iii) the California RPS or California Long Term Contracting Requirements being superseded by another state or federal program, or (iv) in Seller’s representations and warranties concerning RA Product to not be true, Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts and promptly take such commercially reasonably actions as are necessary to cause the Product to satisfy the requirements of this Confirmation taking account of such Change in Law or otherwise deliver the Product under an applicable superseding program, if applicable (“Compliance Actions”); provided that, the maximum aggregate amount of out- of-pocket costs and expenses Seller shall be required to expend in furtherance of the foregoing during the Delivery Term shall not exceed $1,000,000 (“Compliance Cost Cap”).

If after Seller has taken Compliance Actions the cost of which reaches the Compliance Cost Cap one or more effects of the Change in Law described in the first sentence of this paragraph has not been remediated, then either Party shall have the right but not the obligation to take Compliance Actions and bear the cost thereof beyond the Compliance Cost Cap. If despite the Compliance Actions taken, after a period of ninety (90) days following the effective date of the Change in Law (during which such period Seller’s obligations impacted by the Change in Law shall be excused), (a) the Product continues to not qualify as PCC1 or otherwise meet the requirements of the California RPS or California Long Term Contracting Requirements, (b) a Party’s performance under this Confirmation remains illegal, unenforceable, or impossible, (c) the Product does not qualify under any program superseding the California RPS or California Long Term Contracting Requirements (if applicable), or (iv) Seller’s representations and warranties concerning RA Product remain untrue, the Parties shall engage in good faith to determine what amendments may be made to this Confirmation to allow the Parties to continue performance hereunder while maintaining substantially the same burdens and benefits expected hereunder as of the Effective Date; provided that neither Party shall be obligated to agree to any such amendments. If no amendments are agreed within forty-five (45) days after the end of the ninety day period referred to above, either Party shall have the right to terminate this Confirmation on written notice to the other Party, such termination shall be without liability or obligation on the part of either Party to the {D0567907.DOCX / 1}5
other, except for the payment of any sums due and owing as a result of performance prior to the Change in Law.

As used herein, “Change in Law” means the occurrence, after the Effective Date, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any Applicable Law; (b) any change in any Applicable Law or in the administration, interpretation or application thereof by any Governmental Authority; or (c) the making or issuance of any request, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of a law) by any Governmental Authority.

California RPS
Non-Modifiable
Standard Terms
and Conditions

(1) Eligibility. Seller, and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that throughout the Delivery Term of this Agreement that: (i) the Project qualifies and is certified by the CEC as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource (“ERR”) as such term is defined in Public Utilities Code Section 399.12 or Section 399.16; and (ii) the Project’s output delivered to Buyer qualifies under the requirements of the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. To the extent a change in law occurs after execution of this Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to be materially false or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller has used commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such change in law. [STC 6, Non-Modifiable. (Source: D.07-11-025, Attachment A.); see also D.08-04-009]

(2) Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights and duties of the Parties hereunder shall be governed by and construed, enforced and performed in accordance with the laws of the state of California, without regard to principles of conflicts of law. To the extent enforceable at such time, each Party waives its respective right to any jury trial with respect to any litigation arising under or in connection with this Agreement. [STC 17, Non-Modifiable. (Source: D.07-11-025, Attachment A); see also D.08-04-009]

(3) Transfer of Renewable Energy Credits. Seller and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that throughout the Delivery Term of this Agreement the renewable energy credits transferred to Buyer conform to the definition and attributes required for compliance with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard, as set forth in California Public Utilities Commission Decision 08-08-028, and as may be modified by subsequent decision of the California Public Utilities Commission or by subsequent legislation. To the extent a change in law occurs after execution of this Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to be materially false or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller has used commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such change in law. [STC REC-1, Non-Modifiable. D.11-01-025]

(4) Tracking of RECs in WREGIS. Seller warrants that all necessary steps to allow the Renewable Energy Credits transferred to Buyer to be tracked in the Western Renewable Energy Generation Information System will be taken prior to the first delivery under the contract. [STC REC-2, Non- Modifiable. D.11-01-025]

PART 2 - RESOURCE ADEQUACY CAPACITY PRODUCT (RA Product) RA Product:During the Delivery Term, Seller grants, pledges, assigns, transfers and otherwise commits to Buyer the RA Product, which shall constitute a Firm Capacity product for purposes of Schedule C of the Master Agreement.
{D0567907.DOCX / 1}6
RA Product
Delivery Point:The delivery point for RA Product from each Project from which Seller supplies RA Product hereunder shall be within the CAISO balancing authority area, and otherwise a Project shall be dynamically scheduled into or pseudo-tied to the CAISO balancing authority area.

Contract
Quantity of
RRA Product:The Contract Quantity of RA Product for each month of the Delivery Term shall be an amount equal to the product of the Solar PV ELCC multiplied by 40MW. As used herein, “Solar PV ELCC” means the percentage for each compliance year determined and published from time to time by the CAISO and CPUC and listed in the reporting for technology factors for each year.

For informational purposes and by way of example only, the 2024 Solar PV ELCC’s are set forth in the table below with numeric months corresponding to those of a calendar year starting with January such that, for example, the Contract Quantity of RA Product for July 2024 (month 7) would be 14.4% * 40 MW = 5.76 MW of RA Product. The Parties acknowledge the table is for purposes of example only and is subject to change by CAISO and/or CPUC.

Additional
Representations and
Warranties for RA
Product
Seller represents and warrants to Buyer during the Delivery Term that:

(a) Seller owns or has the exclusive right to the RA Product sold under this Confirmation from the Projects, and shall furnish to Buyer, CAISO, CEC, CPUC or other jurisdictional LRA, or other Governmental Body with such evidence as may reasonably be requested to demonstrate such ownership or exclusive right; (b) no portion of the Contract Quantity of the RA Product has been committed by Seller to any third party in order to satisfy RAR or analogous obligations in CAISO markets nor markets outside of CAISO;
(c) each Project is connected to the CAISO via pseudo tie or dynamic scheduling or is within the CAISO balancing authority area;

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}7
(d) Seller has taken, or has caused its scheduling coordinator to take, all actions required by the CAISO regarding qualification of each Project as eligible to provide NQC; and
(e) The aggregation of all amounts of RAR Attributes that Seller has sold, assigned or transferred for each Project does not exceed the Unit NQC.

Roseville’s
Re-Sale of
The Product: During the Delivery Term, Roseville may re-sell all or a portion of the RA Product purchased and sold hereunder, and shall be entitled to receive and retain all revenues associated with such re-sale. For the avoidance of doubt, Seller is not responsible or liable for any damages, costs, penalties, expenses, or other amounts for which Roseville is or may be liable to a subsequent purchaser of the RA Product under the terms of the agreement between Roseville and such subsequent purchaser as a result of Roseville’s failure to perform its obligations under such agreement or as a result of Roseville’s failure to submit timely and accurate supply plans for the Project in respect of a Showing Month. Roseville covenants and agrees that it will not purport to sell any capacity attributes of a Project that are not included in the RA Product purchased hereunder.

PART 3 - DEFINITIONS / INTERPRETATIONS: For purposes of this Confirmation, the following definitions and rules of interpretations shall apply:

“Applicable Law” means all legally binding constitutions, treaties, statutes, laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, interpretations, permits, judgments, decrees, injunctions, writs and orders of any Governmental Authority or arbitrator that apply to the Applicable Program, the Product or any one or both of the Parties or the terms hereof.

“CAISO” means the California Independent System Operator Corporation, or its successor.

“California Long Term Contracting Requirements" means a contract of minimum 10-years in duration, as required by CEC regulations, 20 C.C.R. Section 3204(d).

“California Renewables Portfolio Standard” and “California RPS” mean the renewable energy program and policies codified in California Public Utilities Code Sections 399.11 through 399.32 as such provisions are amended or supplemented from time to time.

“CEC” means the California Energy Commission or its regulatory successor.

“Confirmation” has the meaning specified in the introductory paragraph hereof.

“CPUC” means the California Public Utilities Commission, or its successor.

“CPUC Decisions” means, as applicable, CPUC Decisions 04-01-050, 04-10-035, 05-10-042, 06-04-040, 06-06- 064, 06-07-031, 07-06-029, 08-06-031, 09-06-028, 10-06-036, 11-06-022, 12-06-025, 13-06-024, 14-06-050, 15-06- 063, 16-06-045 and subsequent decisions related to Resource Adequacy as amended or supplemented from time to time.

“FCR” means the flexible capacity requirements established for LSEs by the CPUC pursuant to the CPUC Decisions, or by an LRA or other Governmental Body having jurisdiction.

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}8
“FCR Attributes”means, with respect to a generating unit, any and all resource adequacy attributes of the generating unit, as may be identified from time to time by the CPUC, CAISO, or other Governmental Body having jurisdiction, that can be counted toward an LSE’s FCR.

“Governmental Authority” means any international, national, federal, provincial, state, municipal, county, regional or local government, administrative, judicial or regulatory entity operating under any Applicable Laws and includes any department, commission, bureau, board, administrative agency or regulatory body of any of the foregoing.

“LAR” means local area reliability, which is any program of localized resource adequacy requirements established for jurisdictional LSEs by the CPUC pursuant to the CPUC Decisions, or by another LRA having jurisdiction over the LSE. LAR may also be known as local resource adequacy, local RAR, or local capacity requirement in other regulatory proceedings or legislative actions.

“LAR Attributes” means, with respect to a Project, any and all RAR Attributes (or other locational attributes related to system reliability), as they are identified as of the Effective Date by the CPUC, CAISO, LRA, or other Governmental Authority having jurisdiction, associated with the physical location or point of electrical interconnection of the Project within the CAISO balancing authority area, that can be counted toward LAR, but exclusive of any RAR Attributes which are not associated with where in the CAISO balancing authority area the Project is physically located or electrically interconnected..

“LRA” has the meaning specified for such term in the Tariff.

“LSE” means load-serving entity, which may be an investor-owned utility, an electric service provider, a community aggregator or community choice aggregator, or a municipality serving electric load in the CAISO balancing authority area (excluding exports).

“NERC” means the North American Electric Reliability Council, or its successor .
“Net Qualifying Capacity” or “NQC” has the meaning set forth in the Tariff.

“RA” or “Resource Adequacy” means the regulatory framework established by the CPUC Decisions governing the RAR.

"RA Product” means the RAR Attributes of the Projects associated with the Contract Quantity of RA Product.

“RAR” means the Resource Adequacy requirements, exclusive of LAR and FCR established for LSEs by the CPUC pursuant to the CPUC Decisions, or by an LRA or other Governmental Authority having jurisdiction.

“RAR Attributes” means, with respect to a Project, any and all Resource Adequacy attributes, as they are identified as of the Confirmation Effective Date by the CPUC, or Governmental Body having jurisdiction that can be counted toward RAR, exclusive of any LAR Attributes and any FCR Attributes.

“STC” stands for Standard Terms and Conditions of the CPUC.

“Tariff” means the tariff and protocol provisions of the CAISO, as amended or supplemented from time to time.

“WECC” means the Western Electricity Coordinating Council or its successor organizations.

“WREGIS” means the Western Renewable Energy Generation Information System or its successor systems.

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}9
PART 4 – MISCELLANEOUS
(1) The Parties agree this Confirmation constitutes a sale of a nonfinancial commodity for deferred shipment or delivery that the Parties intend to be physically settled and is excluded from the term “swap” as defined in the Commodity Exchange Act under 7 U.S.C § 1a (47) and related rules. During the Delivery Term, each Party represents and warrants to the other that: (i) it is an “eligible commercial entity” and an “eligible contract participant” within the meaning of United States Commodity Exchange Act §§1a (47) and 1a(18), respectively, and this Transaction has been subject to individual negotiations by the Parties. (2) Data Privacy. The Parties may provide each other with information related to an identified or identifiable individual (“Personal Data”), the processing and transfer of which will be done in accordance with applicable data protection law.

(3) Anticorruption: Each Party represents, warrants and covenants to the other that: (i) to the extent applicable, it will comply with the Anti-Corruption Laws (as defined herein) with respect to all transactions under this Agreement; (ii) it has not made and will not make, offer, authorize, or accept any payment, gift, or other benefit, directly or indirectly (whether via its affiliates, agents, contractors or other third parties), to or from any government official or any other Person for the purpose of facilitating or carrying out any transaction hereunder which would violate the Anti-Corruption Laws; (iii) it will promptly notify the other Party if it becomes aware of any violation of the Anti-Corruption Laws in connection with any transaction hereunder, subject to the preservation of legal privilege; and (iv) except as the other Party may agree in writing, all payments payable to a Party pursuant to this Agreement shall be made only to the account of such Party, and not to the account of any other person. “Anti-Corruption Laws” mean (a) the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977; (b) the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010; and (c) all applicable laws that prohibit money laundering, or otherwise dealing in the proceeds of crime, or the bribery of, or the providing of unlawful gratuities, facilitation payments, or other benefits to any government official or any other person, or tax evasion.

(4) FERC Standard of Review; Mobile-Sierra Waiver

(a) Absent the agreement of all Parties to the proposed change, the standard of review for changes to any rate, charge, classification, term or condition of this Agreement, whether proposed by a Party (to the extent that any waiver in subsection (b) below is unenforceable or ineffective as to such Party), a non-party or FERC acting sua sponte, shall solely be the “public interest” application of the “just and reasonable” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956) and Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956) and clarified by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527 (2008), and NRG Power Marketing LLC v. Maine Public Utility Commission, 558 U.S. 527 (2010).

(b) In addition, and notwithstanding the foregoing subsection (a), to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, each Party, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby expressly and irrevocably waives any rights it can or may have, now or in the future, whether under §§ 205 and/or 206 of the Federal Power Act or otherwise, to seek to obtain from FERC by any means, directly or indirectly (through complaint, investigation or otherwise), and each hereby covenants and agrees not at any time to seek to so obtain, an order from FERC changing any section of this Agreement specifying the rate, charge, classification, or other term or condition agreed to by the Parties, it being the express intent of the Parties that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, neither Party shall unilaterally seek to obtain from FERC any relief changing the rate, charge, classification, or other term or condition of this Agreement, notwithstanding any subsequent changes in applicable law or market conditions that may occur. In the event it were to be determined that applicable law precludes the Parties from waiving their rights to seek changes from FERC to their market-based power sales {D0567907.DOCX / 1}10
contracts (including entering into covenants not to do so) then this subsection (b) shall not apply, provided that, consistent with the foregoing subsection (a), neither Party shall seek any such changes except solely under the “public interest” application of the “just and reasonable” standard of review and otherwise as set forth in the foregoing section (a).

PART 4 – MODIFICATIONS TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT
For purposes of this transaction only, the Master Agreement shall be amended as follows:

(a) The definition of “Business Day” in Section 4 of the Master Agreement is amended by adding “or the Friday after the United States Thanksgiving holiday” before the period at the end of the first sentence.

(b) The sentence “ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR REMEDIES ARE HEREBY WAIVED.” in Section 21.1 of the WSPP Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

“LIMITATION OF DAMAGES. FOR BREACH OF ANY PROVISION OF A CONFIRMATION OR THE

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR WHICH AN EXPRESS REMEDY OR MEASURE OF DAMAGES IS

PROVIDED, SUCH EXPRESS REMEDY OR MEASURE OF DAMAGES IS THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY, THE OBLIGOR’S LIABILITY FOR THE BREACH SHALL BE LIMITED AS

SET FORTH IN SUCH PROVISION, AND ALL OTHER REMEDIES FOR DAMAGES AT LAW OR IN EQUITY ARE WAIVED. IF NO EXPRESS REMEDY OR MEASURE OF DAMAGES IS PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN A TRANSACTION FOR A PARTICULAR BREACH, THE OBLIGOR’S

LIABILITY FOR THE BREACH IS LIMITED TO DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES ONLY, SUCH

DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY AND ALL OTHER REMEDIES FOR DAMAGES AT LAW OR IN EQUITY ARE WAIVED. NEITHER PARTY IS LIABLE

FOR INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL OR INDIRECT

DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE (INCLUDING DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH LOST PROFITS,

BUSINESS INTERRUPTION AND LOSS OF GOODWILL) ARISING AT ANY TIME, WHETHER IN

TORT (INCLUDING THE SOLE OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF EITHER PARTY OR ANY

RELATED PERSON), WARRANTY, STRICT LIABILITY, CONTRACT OR STATUTE, UNDER ANY INDEMNITY PROVISION, OR OTHERWISE. TO THE EXTENT ANY DAMAGES REQUIRED TO BE

PAID HEREUNDER ARE LIQUIDATED, THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE DAMAGES

ARE DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE, OR OTHERWISE OBTAINING AN ADEQUATE

REMEDY IS INCONVENIENT AND THE DAMAGES CALCULATED HEREUNDER CONSTITUTE A REASONABLE APPROXIMATION OF THE HARM OR LOSS.”

(c) Section 24 of the WSPP Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:
“This WSPP Agreement and any Confirmation shall be governed by and construed, enforced and performed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to principles of conflicts of law or contrary provisions of the WSPP Agreement, if any.”

(d) Subsections 34.1 and 34.2 of the WSPP Agreement are hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

“34.1 INFORMAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION
IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISPUTE ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS

FOLLOWING THE RECEIPT OF A WRITTEN NOTICE FROM EITHER PARTY IDENTIFYING SUCH

DISPUTE, THE PARTIES SHALL MEET, NEGOTIATE AND ATTEMPT, IN GOOD FAITH, TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE QUICKLY, INFORMALLY AND INEXPENSIVELY. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO RESOLVE A DISPUTE ARISING HEREUNDER WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER

RECEIPT OF SUCH NOTICE, THEN EITHER PARTY MAY SEEK ANY AND ALL REMEDIES {D0567907.DOCX / 1}11

AVAILABLE TO IT AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT.”

“34.2 EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION, WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. EACH PARTY SUBMITS TO THE

EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE OR FEDERAL COURTS LOCATED IN SAN DIEGO,

CALIFORNIA, FOR ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY

TRANSACTION, AND EXPRESSLY WAIVES ANY OBJECTION IT MAY HAVE TO SUCH JURISDICTION OR THE CONVENIENCE OF SUCH FORUM. EACH PARTY WAIVES TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY.”

(e) Section 35 of the WSPP Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

“The Parties intend that (i) all transactions constitute a “forward contract” within the meaning of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) or a “swap agreement” within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) all payments made or to be made by one Party to the other Party pursuant to this Agreement constitute “settlement payments” within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) all transfers of Performance Assurance by one Party to the other Party under this Agreement constitute “margin payments” within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code; and (iv) this Agreement constitutes a “master netting agreement” within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code.”

(f) Section 35 of the WSPP Agreement is further modified by adding the following sentence at the end:

“City of Roseville (“Roseville”) represents that it is a special entity as defined in Section 4s(h)(2)(C) of the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation

23.401(c).”

(g) The following phrase is inserted at the beginning of Section 37: “On the date of entering into this Confirmation,”.

(h) Section 41 “Witness” of the WSPP Agreement shall become Section 42 and the following “Standard of Review” Section shall be inserted as Section 41:

“The Parties agree as follows:

From the date of entering into a Transaction under this Agreement and throughout the term of such Transaction, the Parties each warrant and covenant as follows:

(i) The following is added to Section 37 of the WSPP Agreement:

FERC Standard of Review; Mobile-Sierra Waiver.

(a) Absent the agreement of all Parties to the proposed change, the standard of review for changes to any rate, charge, classification, term or condition of this Agreement, whether proposed by a Party (to the extent that any waiver in subsection (b) below is unenforceable or ineffective as to such Party), a non-party or FERC acting sua sponte, shall solely be the “public interest” application of the “just and reasonable” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956) and Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956) and clarified by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527, 128 S.Ct. 2733 (2008), and NRG Power Marketing LLC v. Maine Public Utility Commission, 558 U.S. 527 (2010). (the “Mobile- Sierra” doctrine).

(b) To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, each Party, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby expressly and irrevocably waives any rights it can or may have, now or in the future, whether under {D0567907.DOCX / 1}12
§§ 205 and/or 206 of the Federal Power Act or otherwise, to obtain from FERC by any means, directly or indirectly (through complaint, investigation or otherwise), an order changing any section of this Agreement.

In the event it were to be determined that applicable law precludes the Parties from waiving their rights to seek changes from FERC to their market-based power sales contracts (including entering into covenants not to do so) then this subsection (b) shall not apply, provided that, the foregoing subsection (a), shall apply.

Entire Agreement; No Oral Agreements or Modifications

This Confirmation sets forth the terms of the Transaction into which the Parties have entered and shall constitute the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the contemplated purchase and sale of the Product. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, this Transaction may be confirmed only through a Documentary Writing executed by both Parties, and no amendment or modification to this Transaction shall be enforceable except through a Documentary Writing executed by both Parties.

[signature page follows]

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Confirmation effective as of the Effective Date.

City of Roseville Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.

By: By:

Name: Name:

Title: Title:

Attachment:

Exhibit 1 – Project Generation Profile.

Exhibit 2 – Portfolio Projects

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}14
EXHIBIT 1

PROJECT GENERATION PROFILE
Hourly Contract Quantity

{D0567907.DOCX / 1}15
EXHIBIT 2 – PORTFOLIO PROJECTS

No. Name of Facility Fuel Source Location
CEC

ID WREGIS ID
1 Coachella Hills Wind CA 64593A W11289
2 Maverick Solar 4, LLC Solar CA 64330A W10626
3 Maverick Solar 7, LLC Solar CA 64332A W11822
4 Voyager Wind 2 Wind CA 63686A W7267
5 Rattlesnake Road Wind Farm Wind OR 60553A W805
6 Willow Creek Energy Center LLC Wind OR 60723A W897
7 Sandrini 1 Solar Solar CA 64277C TBD
8 Shell Energy Portfolio Additions V Various TBD TBD TBD RESOLUTION NO. 24-331

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US) L.P., AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, the Western Systems Power Pool (WSPP) is an organization of electric wholesale market entities that have developed and utilize a standardized power agreement (WSPP Agreement) to execute trading opportunities, allowing WSPP members to manage power delivery and price risk; and

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville and Shell Energy North America (US) L.P. entered into a WSPP agreement in October 2010; and

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1, increases the credit limits for both parties from $15,000,000 to $25,000,000 for high investment-grade ratings, reflects the improved financial standing of both parties and the need to accommodate larger transactions while maintaining robust credit safeguards; and

WHEREAS, an Amendment to WSPP Agreement Credit Support Addendum (Amendment No. 1), has been reviewed by the Council;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Amendment is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

AMENDMENT TO
WSPP Agreement Credit Support Addendum
(Amendment No. 1)
THIS AMENDMENT TO the WSPP Agreement Credit Support Addendum (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of___________, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Shell Energy North America (US), L.P. (“Shell Energy”) and City of Roseville, California (“Roseville”). The parties to this Amendment are referred to herein together as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.” Recitals:

WHEREAS, the Parties have previously entered into that certain WSPP Agreement Credit Support Addendum dated October 6th, 2010, including, without limitation, the terms and conditions of the WSPP Agreement, version dated effective September 11, 2023, promulgated by WSPP, Inc. (as amended from time to time, the “Master Agreement”) and
WHEREAS, the Parties have now agreed to amend certain provisions of the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Amendment of the Agreement. Effective as of the Effective Date, the following provisions set forth in the Agreement shall be and are hereby amended as follows:

(a) In Section (A)(a) Security Threshold.
(i) Under Section (y) The ‘Party or Credit Support Provider’s Credit Rating’ table is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the table below:

Party or Credit Support Provider’s Credit Rating’
S&P Credit Rating Moody’s Credit RatingCollateral Threshold Amount
A- or above A3 or above $25,000,000
BBB+ or above Baa1 or above $15,000,000
BBB Baa2 or above $10,000,000
BBB- Baa3 $2,500,000
Below BBB- Below Baa3 $0
A- In Section (A)(b) Material Adverse Change
(ii) Term (x) is deleted in entirety.

(11) SENA (050317)
2 2. Representations. Each Party hereby represents and warrants to the other Party that:
(a) it has the full power and authority to execute and deliver this Amendment and to perform all of its obligations hereunder;
(b) its obligations under the Agreement, as amended hereby, constitute its legal, valid and binding obligations, enforceable in accordance with its respective terms (subject to applicable bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general application (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law)).
(c) all representations contained in the Agreement, as amended, are true and accurate as of the date of this Amendment and that such representations are deemed to be given or repeated by each Party, as the case may be, on the date of this Amendment.

3. Miscellaneous.
(a) Definitions.Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings specified in the Agreement.
(b) Entire Agreement. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all oral communication and prior writings (except as otherwise provided herein) with respect thereto. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged, in full force and effect, and shall be binding upon the Parties, their representatives, successors and assigns. (c) Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in as many counterparts as are necessary and all executed counterparts together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. The electronic transmission of a signed original counterpart of this Amendment and transmission, or re-transmission, of an electronically-signed counterpart shall be deemed to be the same as delivery of a signed original counterpart of this Amendment. At the request of either Party, the Parties will confirm an electronically signed or transmitted counterpart by signing an original counterpart for delivery between them by mail or courier service; provided, however, a Party’s failure to so confirm such a counterpart shall not affect the validity and enforceability of this Amendment.

B- Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the applicable law governing the Agreement. (11) SENA (050317)
3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment on the dates specified below with effect from the Effective Date.

City of Roseville, California. SHELL ENERGY NORTH
AMERICA (US), L.P

By: By: _________
Name: Name:

Title: Title:

Date: ___ Date:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3547
File #:
0200
Title:

Fiscal Year 2023-24 Third Quarter Report
Contact:

N. Rothlisberger 916-774-5314 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 9.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
This is an informational item and requires no City Council action.

BACKGROUND
The attached report provides a summary of the City’s financial position through the third quarter of FY2023-24, covering: (1) the General Fund, (2) the enterprise operating funds, and (3) revenues in other selected funds. This report is provided in accordance with Section 7.15 of the City Charter, which governs Budgetary Control. Staff will present an overview of the third quarter results to the City Council, including forecasted year-end results, and upcoming financial key dates.

FISCAL IMPACT
This item is a financial update only and has no fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §20165 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. This informational report meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world.

Respectfully Submitted,
Nancy Rothlisberger, Budget Manager
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Third Quarter Report
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Third Quarter Report

1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 – Third Quarter Report

Overview
This report provides an overview of the City of Roseville’s financial status through the third quarter of the fiscal year (FY) 2023-24 (July 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024) for:
(1) the General Fund
(2) the major enterprise operating funds, and
(3) revenues in other selected funds.

This report includes tables and graphs illustrating cumulative operating revenues and expenditures up to the third quarter and comparing budgeted to actual revenues and expenditures. Additionally, the report consists of forecasted revenues, historical revenue trends, explanations of significant variances, and year-end forecast assumptions.

General Fund operating revenues collected through the third quarter are 59 percent of the budget. While tax revenues are trending below estimates, this level of collection as of the third quarter is expected and consistent with prior years due to the timing of receiving some of the more significant revenue sources.

The following factors should be taken into consideration when analyzing this information:
 Sales and Use Tax is the largest General Fund revenue source. The City only receives seven months of sales tax revenue by the end of the third quarter each fiscal year due to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) processing timelines. Third-quarter revenues are derived from taxable sales through January 2024, with January sales tax received in March.  Property Tax is the second largest General Fund revenue source, but most of this tax revenue is received from Placer County in the third (mid-January) and fourth (mid-May) quarters. This distribution schedule is why property tax revenue is tracking low at 56 percent in the following table and graph.
 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT, or hotel tax) for the third quarter is derived from payments received through March for hotel stays through February; therefore, the following charts only reflect eight months of TOT revenues.
 Other Revenues, including reimbursements from the State, property transfer tax, business license tax, and other fees, are tracking three percent above estimates through the end of the third quarter.

General Fund expenditures through the third quarter are 71 percent of the budget. Savings from vacant positions in Fire, PRL, Development Services, Public Works, and other General Fund departments, and the

2 timing of expenditures are the primary drivers of the slightly lower spending rate (71 percent versus 75 percent of the year elapsed).

General Fund: Year-End Forecast
General Fund sales tax revenues in the third quarter of FY2023-24 continue to trend below budget estimates. The growth rates of sales tax revenues (both Bradley Burns and Measure B) have declined compared to the post-pandemic years, influenced by factors such as inflation and shifts in consumer spending habits towards areas that were constrained during the pandemic. Sales tax is anticipated to end the year two percent ($2.4 million) below budget estimates, compared to the second quarter forecast, which had predicted a six percent ($6 million) shortfall. Sales tax year-end results for FY2023-24 are half of a percent ($0.5 million) higher compared to the prior year.

Property tax revenues will exceed initial projections by three percent or $2.1 million. Hotel tax revenue will end the year on budget at $7.22 million.

Revenues from building permits, plan check fees, and engineering inspection fees are expected to meet or exceed budget estimates as the positive trend in development activity continued into the third and fourth quarters. Similarly, the year-end forecast for PRL program revenues remains the same and is projected to achieve its revenue target by the end of the fiscal year.

As mentioned in the second quarter report, staff held off on making the $4.6 million additional discretionary payment (ADP) to CalPERS due to the forecasted sales tax shortfall. Staff forecast that higher-than- expected revenues in other categories as well as expenditure savings (including labor, materials, services, and supplies), will offset the forecasted shortfall in sales tax and that there will be adequate year-end surplus available to consider making the ADP in January 2025 when the year-end results for FY2023-24 are finalized.

General Fund: Operating Revenues
The following table includes cumulative General Fund operating revenue through the third quarter and a revenue budget to actual comparison for FY2023-24.

3 BUDGET TO CUMULATIVE REVENUE COMPARISON
(July 1, 2023 – March 31, 2024)

Revenue Type Amended
Budget
Cumulative
Revenues
Balance
Remaining
% of
Budget
Collected
Sales and Use Tax - Bradley Burns $ 72,688,000 $ 39,339,410 $ (33,348,590) 54% Sales and Use Tax - Measure B 29,775,000 17,021,615 (12,753,385) 57% Sales and Use Tax - State Aid for Public Safety 1,777,000 1,103,551 (673,449) 62% Property Tax 70,347,000 39,717,255 (30,629,745) 56% Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 7,250,000 4,732,439 (2,517,561) 65% Parks, Recreation & Libraries Programs 4,710,632 3,404,071 (1,306,561) 72% Building Permits 2,920,836 2,505,737 (415,099) 86% Plan Check Fees 2,536,300 2,186,896 (349,404) 86% Engineering Inspection Fees 353,196 345,493 (7,703) 98% Other Revenues 15,704,181 12,327,382 (3,376,799) 78% TOTAL $ 208,062,145 $ 122,683,849 $ (85,378,296) 59%

General Fund operating revenues collected through the third quarter are 59 percent of the budget primarily due to the timing associated with receiving some of the more significant tax revenue sources. For instance, property tax is the second largest General Fund revenue source, but most of this funding is received in the third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. The following is an explanation of the notable variances:
54%57%62%56%65%72%86%86%98%78%59%0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%Sales and Use Tax - Bradley BurnsSales and Use Tax - Measure BSales and Use Tax - Public SafetyProperty TaxTransient Occupancy Tax (TOT)Parks, Recreation & LibrariesBuilding PermitsPlan Check FeesEngineering Inspection FeesOther RevenuesTotalGeneral Fund Operating Revenues Cumulative Percentage of Revenue Collected(July 1, 2023 – March 31, 2024)Amended Budget% of Revenue Collected$ 72.69 M$ 29.78 M$ 1.78 M$ 70.35 M$ 7.25 M$ 4.71 M$ 2.92 M$ 2.54 M$ .35 M$ 15.70 M$ 208.06 M

4 Bradley Burns and Measure B Sales Tax
The City's Bradley Burns sales tax revenue ended the third quarter at 54 percent of the budget. Similarly, Measure B sales tax revenue tracked at 57 percent of the budget. Sales tax revenue received by the City during this period is derived from taxable sales through January 2024. However, to date, the City has received $70,122,618 in Bradley Burns sales tax distributions and $29,944,203 in Measure B distributions from taxable sales through the end of June.

As mentioned earlier in this report, year-end results for sales tax revenue show a slight recovery of $0.5 million in sales tax revenues compared to the previous fiscal year. The slow revenue growth is attributed to higher interest rates and a shift in consumer spending towards service-related purchases that are not taxable. The latest most-likely forecast provided by the sales tax consultant indicated that revenues may end at $69.3 million (Bradley Burns) and $29.2 million (Measure B), which is $4 million under budget estimates, instead, sales tax distributions received through year-end were higher than the consultant’s projection at only $2.4 million under budget estimates.

SALES TAX BUDGET TO ACTUALS

Revenue Type Amended Budget Actuals Variance
Sales and Use Tax - Bradley Burns $ 72,688,000 $ 70,122,618 $ (2,565,382) Sales and Use Tax - Measure B 29,775,000 29,944,203 169,203 TOTAL $ 102,463,000 $ 100,066,821 $ (2,396,179)

The graphs provided below show Bradley Burns and Measure B Sales and Use Tax revenues collected through March as compared to budget and the projected year-end results.

$29.8$17.0$29.9$0$5$10$15$20$25$30$35Budget Actuals Year-endProjectionMillionsMeasure B Sales & Use Tax Revenue $72.7$39.3$70.1$0$10$20$30$40$50$60$70$80Budget Actuals Year-endProjectionMillionsBradley Burns Sales & Use Tax Revenue

5 The following graph presents historical Bradley Burns Sales and Use Tax quarterly revenues from July 2021 through March 2024 for the Roseville Automall, Creekside Town Center, The Fountains, and the Galleria Mall. Creekside and The Fountains, represented by the bottom two lines in red and green, have remained relatively flat. The Galleria Mall (purple line) shows a steady pattern since 2021, with seasonal spikes during the holiday quarters and notable declines in the first quarter. The Automall (blue line) has returned to 2020 levels near $3 million, as the average price of vehicles spiked during 2022 and declined in 2023 and into 2024. Although vehicle registrations are predicted to increase slightly in California during 2024, according to the California New Car Dealers Association (CNCDA), key factors affecting the downward trend in vehicle sales include elevated finance and lease costs due to higher interest rates and the erosion of purchasing power because of inflation. Staff pay close attention to these trends, as well as the other sectors of the local economy, to better understand and be able to forecast sales tax revenue.

City of Roseville - Quarterly Sales Tax
Automall - Creekside - The Fountains - Galleria Mall

Additional Sales Tax Information: The City's sales tax consultant has prepared a detailed sales tax report and business activity (attached at the end of this report). The report provides a list of the top 25 sales tax remitters, a summary of cash receipts, and sales tax data by economic category.

6 Property Tax

Property tax revenue for FY2023-24 is based on the
assessed valuation as of January 1, 2023. The City
receives most of this funding in the third and fourth
quarters of the fiscal year, which explains why it has only received $39.7 million in revenue through the third
quarter. To date, the City has received $72.5 million,
exceeding budget estimates by approximately $2.1
million.

Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT)

The City's transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues, also known as the hotel tax, were at 65 percent of budget
through the end of the third quarter. TOT collected for hotel stays through June 2024 totals $7.22 million,
meeting the budget target.

In November 2022 Roseville voters approved Measure C,
increasing the City’s TOT rate from six to 10 percent,
effective January 1, 2023. This resulted in approximately $2.9 million in additional revenues in FY2023-24.

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Programs

Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) program revenues are slightly below 75 percent for the third quarter at 72 percent due to the seasonality of programming. Based on the current data, staff continue to anticipate that PRL will slightly exceed its FY2023-24 revenue budget.

Building Permits, Plan Check Fees, Engineering Inspection Fees

Building permit revenues and plan check fees as of the third quarter are trending to end the year above budget, driven by sustained increases in the City’s development activity. Engineering inspection fees finished the third quarter just shy of the year-end estimate of $353,000 due to high levels of utility infrastructure inspection fees collected. The Development Services Department recovers the cost of staff $70.3$39.7$72.5$0$10$20$30$40$50$60$70$80Budget Actuals Year-endProjectionMillionsProperty Tax Revenues $7.25$4.73$7.22$0.0$1.0$2.0$3.0$4.0$5.0$6.0$7.0$8.0Budget Actuals Year-endProjectionMillionsTransient Occupancy Tax (TOT)

7 labor for these inspections from the utility franchise fees received in the General Fund. To date, all development-related revenues in this category have exceeded FY2023-24 revenue targets.

Other Revenues

Other revenues include reimbursements from the State, development reimbursement activity, property transfer tax, business license tax, rental payments, animal licensing, passport processing, permit franchise, and other fees. As of the end of the third quarter, revenues in this category are tracking slightly higher than target at 78 percent of budget estimates. Revenues in this category are expected to meet or exceed the budget through the end of the year.

General Fund: Operating Expenditures

BUDGET TO CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURE COMPARISON
(July 1, 2023 – March 31, 2024)

Department Amended
Budget
Cumulative
Expenditures Variance
% of
Budget
Expended
Police $ 59,059,992 $ 43,828,686 $ (15,231,306) 74% Fire 45,603,568 32,655,655 (12,947,913) 72% Parks, Recreation & Libraries 35,101,143 24,655,000 (10,446,143) 70% General Government* 14,000,032 9,919,655 (4,080,377) 71% Development Services 11,964,644 8,246,066 (3,718,578) 69% Public Works 10,523,233 6,366,820 (4,156,413) 61% Economic Development & Housing 915,697 638,093 (277,604) 70% TOTAL $ 177,168,309 $ 126,309,975 $ (50,858,334) 71%

8 *General Government includes the following departments: City Council, City Manager’s Office, City Attorney’s Office, City Clerk, Finance, Public Affairs and Communications, and Human Resources.

General Fund expenditures are tracking below estimates compared to the budget at 71 percent through the third quarter of the fiscal year. The slightly lower spending rate (71 percent versus 75 percent of the year elapsed) is primarily due to cost savings from vacant positions in Fire, PRL, Development Services, Public Works, and other General Fund departments, as well as the timing of expenditures.

The Police Department’s expenditures through the third quarter are slightly below target at 74 percent and are expected to end the year within budget.

The Fire Department’s expenditure budget consumption is below target at 72 percent. Savings are due to limited-term firefighter positions that had transitioned into permanent positions due to retirements and materials, services and supplies received and paid during the fourth quarter. Staff anticipates this trend will continue, and the Fire Department will end the year under budget.

PRL expenditures were 70 percent of the budget through the third quarter, primarily due to position vacancies and the seasonality of spending related to recreation programming. As anticipated, recreation expenditures increased in the fourth quarter due to summer programming, but overall, the Department is forecast to end the year under budget.

The General Government departments ended the third quarter with 71 percent of budget expended. Overall, the General Government departments are forecasted to end the year under budget. 74%
72%
70%
71%
69%
61%
70%
71%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Police
Fire
Parks, Recreation & Libraries
General Government*
Development Services
Public Works
Economic Development & Housing
Total
General Fund Department Operating Expenditures
Cummulative Percentage of Budget Expended
(July 1, 2023 – March 31, 2024)
Amended
Budget% of Budget Expended
$ 59.06 M
$ 45.60 M
$ 35.10 M
$ 14.00 M
$ 11.96 M
$ 10.52 M
$ .92 M
$ 177.17 M
9 Development Services expenditures are 69 percent of the budget due to salary savings from full-time position vacancies and lower-than-expected materials, services, and supplies expenses. Development Services expenditures remained under budget through the fourth quarter.

Public Works expenditures through the third quarter are at 61 percent of the budget, due to several factors, including vacancies in the Engineering and Street Maintenance Divisions, as well as lower-than-anticipated spending in materials, services, and supplies. Increased rainfall over the last two seasons shifted Drainage operations to maintenance-heavy activities like outfall cleanout and floodwall rehabilitation, which required fewer materials and decreased spending on repairs and maintenance. Additionally, higher recovery of labor costs in the Engineering Division and lower-than-expected expenditures in Facilities contributed to these results. Staff anticipates that overall spending will remain under budget through the end of the fiscal year.

The Economic Development Department is tracking at 70 percent of the budget through the third quarter.

This trend continued through the fourth quarter and the department is anticipated to end the year within budget.

Enterprise Funds: Operating Revenues
The table below displays data for operating revenue in the City’s seven enterprise funds. Following the table are details on each.

BUDGET TO CUMULATIVE REVENUE COMPARISON
(July 1, 2023 – March 31, 2024)
Amended
Budget
Cumulative
Revenues
Balance
Remaining
% of
Budget
Collected
Electric Fund $ 194,129,579 $ 149,705,951 $ (44,423,628) 77% Water Operations Fund 42,537,264 29,895,956 (12,641,308) 70% Wastewater Operations Fund 51,602,124 41,023,306 (10,578,818) 79% Waste Services Operations Fund 42,601,468 31,088,300 (11,513,168) 73% Transit Fund 8,463,156 689,856 (7,773,300) 8%
Transportation Fund 2,105,285 106,049 (1,999,236) 5% Youth Development Fund 8,623,077 5,146,778 (3,476,299) 60%  Electric Fund
Operating revenues in the Electric Fund are slightly higher than budget through the third quarter and are projected to exceed the budget by the end of the fiscal year. This variance is primarily attributed to increased retail sales driven by higher-than-expected customer usage during times of warmer- than-average temperatures and a rate increase effective June 1, 2024. Another, contributing factor to the positive variance is the unbudgeted sale of freely allocated Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission

10 allowances from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as part of the California Greenhouse Gas Cap-and Trade program. An allowance is a tradable permit to emit one metric ton of a carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas emission. Roseville Electric consigned unused allowances to auction contributing to higher-than-anticipated revenues. The entirety of the GHG revenue is planned to support the costs associated with the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) capital project incurred in FY2024-25.

Despite these revenue increases, the positive variance is expected to be partially offset by a reduction in lease revenue from the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) for the use of the Roseville Energy Park (REP) site for two combustion turbine generators. This decline in revenue is a direct result of the termination of the agreement with the State. Roseville expects to take ownership of the two CDWR units, with the title transfer currently pending.  Water Operations Fund
Revenues in the Water Operations Fund are below target at 70 percent of budget through the third quarter mainly because of the timing difference in revenue posting due to the billing cycle. Water Fund revenues are expected to end the year slightly above estimates due to increased consumption and new development.
 Wastewater Operations Fund
Revenues in the Wastewater Operations Fund are tracking higher than the budget because the South Placer Municipal Utility District (SPMUD), one of the City’s regional partners, overpaid for FY2022-23 wastewater treatment costs by $2.2 million. These payments are made based on City estimates, and then trued-up at year end. This $2.2 million was then applied to FY2023-24 making the third quarter budget to actual result appear higher-than-expected (79 percent of budget instead of 75 percent - a difference of $2.3 million). Because of this, SPMUD did not have to make its fourth quarter payment for FY2023-24. However, Wastewater Operations revenues are still expected to end the year over budget because actual treatment costs came in higher than anticipated, resulting in higher payments from the regional partners after the true-up was determined, and new development brought on more customers than anticipated.  Waste Services Operations Fund
Waste Services Operations Fund revenues are tracking lower than the budget through the end of the third quarter, mainly because of the timing differences in revenue posting due to the billing cycle.

Revenues for Waste Services are expected to end the year slightly above estimates due to increased consumption and new development.

11  Transit Fund and Transportation Fund
The larger budget to actual variances in the Transit and Transportation Funds are due to the timing associated with their primary funding streams. Most of their revenue is realized towards the end of the fiscal year. Transit and Transportation revenues will be adequate to cover total expenses incurred in FY2023-24.
 Youth Development Fund
Revenues in the Youth Development Fund are at 60 percent of the budget through the third quarter of the fiscal year. Although significant Youth Development revenues are realized in the last two quarters, staff estimates that revenues will end the year below the budget target. While registration for preschool and grant-funded programs is holding steady, Adventure Club registrations are lower- than-anticipated due to a second state-mandated after-school program provider offering a similar service to families on school campuses.

Enterprise Funds: Operating Expenditures
The table below displays data for operating expenditures in the City’s seven enterprise funds. Following the table are details on each.

BUDGET TO CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURE COMPARISON
(July 1, 2023 – March 31, 2024)
Amended
Budget
Cumulative
Expenditures Variance
% of
Budget
Expended
Electric Fund $ 179,253,120 $ 126,438,345 $ (52,814,775) 71% Water Operations Fund 48,080,010 30,005,126 (18,074,884) 62% Wastewater Operations Fund 58,492,432 39,209,135 (19,283,297) 67% Waste Services Operations Fund 46,763,959 29,784,147 (16,979,812) 64% Transit Fund 8,718,716 5,319,473 (3,399,243) 61%
Transportation Fund 2,163,289 1,240,103 (923,186) 57% Youth Development Fund 8,785,635 5,675,511 (3,110,124) 65%  Electric Fund
Operating expenses for the Electric Fund are slightly below budget through the third quarter and are expected to stay under budget for the rest of the year. This is mainly due to lower-than-expected power supply costs, as Roseville Electric used fewer purchased renewable energy certificates (RECs) than anticipated to meet state requirements. Purchasing RECs helps Roseville Electric meet renewable energy targets when not enough renewable energy has been generated. This lower-than- 12 expected RECs usage, along with reduced chemical consumption, has contributed to the savings.

However, there have been increased expenditures in certain areas. Roseville Electric incurred higher-than-anticipated power plant repair and maintenance costs, due to emergency power general work necessitated by outages and unexpected failure of a variable frequency drive (VFD) at the Roseville Energy Park. Less routine maintenance performed due to extended power plant outages offset these higher-than-anticipated expenditures.

Other contributing factors to the variance include the underspending of public program rebate funds, resulting from significant delays in all-electric home new construction. Increased labor cost reimbursements related to work performed on capital projects, also contributed to the savings.

However, these cost savings have been partially offset by increased overtime expenses related to responses to windstorms earlier this year and other unplanned operational needs.  Water Operations Fund
Expenses in the Water Operations fund are tracking lower at 62 percent through the third quarter, primarily due to water purchase costs, position vacancies, and lower-than-expected materials, services, and supplies expenses. For example, water purchase costs are tracking below estimates due to lower-than-expected delivery costs. Staff plan for the maximum potential water delivery costs, which are not reached every year. Additionally, the Water Utility was experiencing difficulties recruiting experienced employees, resulting in salary savings and lower-than-budgeted training and travel expenses. Finally, due to the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) implementation, which provides significantly more data on customer usage than prior meters, Night Water Waste Patrol services were no longer needed, resulting in professional services savings. Overall, expenses in the Water Operations Fund are expected to remain under budget through the end of the fiscal year.  Wastewater Operations Fund
Wastewater Operating Fund expenses are tracking lower at 67 percent through the third quarter due to savings in professional services, vacancies, training, and travel costs. Professional services expenses are coming in lower than budget while new regulations await implementation. Like the Water Utility, hiring experienced employees has been difficult, resulting in salary savings and lower- than-budgeted training and travel expenses. Because of this and despite increased chemical, software, and repair and maintenance costs, the expenses in the Wastewater Operations Fund are expected to be slightly lower than budget at the end of the fiscal year.  Waste Services Operations Fund
Waste Services Operations Fund expenses are tracking lower at 64 percent through the third quarter, primarily due to reduced fuel costs, position vacancies, and lower-than-expected material, supplies, and services expenses. Fuel costs for trucks are lower than budget due to the use of 13 renewable natural gas produced at the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant. Professional services expenses are tracking low through the third quarter due to planned consulting work that was not required this year including an impact fee study that got pushed out to FY2024-25. Tipping fees (paid to dump refuse at the Materials Recovery Facility) may exceed the budget by five to 10 percent. However, overall expenses for Waste Services are expected to remain under budget through the end of the fiscal year.

Net positive year-end results in all three Environmental Utilities operating funds (Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services) will be transferred to rehabilitation funds for projects such as the utility operations center and fleet electrification or to rate stabilization funds to mitigate future rate increases.
 Transit Fund and Transportation Fund
Transit and Transportation expenditures are tracking under budget due to several factors, including salary savings from vacant positions, lower-than-budgeted training and travel expenses, and the delay of some contract services spending to the last quarter of the year. Additionally, savings in materials and supplies were realized as there were fewer repairs than anticipated for trail signs and trail striping, and supplies for the BikeFest came under budget. As a result, staff anticipates ending the year slightly under budget.
 Youth Development Fund
Expenses for the Youth Development Fund are at 65 percent through the third quarter of the fiscal year as PRL staff continues to take measures to reduce operational costs to offset any revenue shortfall.

Other Revenues: Fire Facilities, Public Facilities, and Strategic Improvement Funds

BUDGET TO CUMULATIVE REVENUE COMPARISON
July 1, 2023 – March 31, 2024
FY2022-23 FY2023-24
Actuals Amended
Budget
Cumulative
Revenues
Variance % of Budget
Collected
Fire Facilities $ 1,415,421 $ 1,594,698 $ 1,524,609 $ 70,089 96% Public Facilities 5,066,052 6,476,821 4,859,878 1,616,943 75% Strategic Improvement 1,744,934 2,286,667 1,825,421 461,246 80% 14 The table above shows revenues in the Fire Facilities, Public Facilities, and Strategic Improvement Funds (SIF) through the third quarter of FY2022-23 and FY2023-24. The revenue estimates for these three funds are generally based on a multi-year trend analysis of forecasted single-family, multi-family, commercial development, and prior-year revenue collections. Revenues for the Fire Facilities are above the budget estimate through March at 96 percent due to increased fee collections and higher-than-expected interest revenue. Public Facilities and Strategic Improvement Funds ended the third quarter at 75 percent and 80 percent, respectively. Staff anticipates that revenues in these three funds will end the year above the budget target.

Top 25 Sales Tax Remitters California sales tax cash receipts increased by 0.7% from the same quarter last year. In this jurisdiction sales tax cash ARCO AM/PM MINI MARTS receipts decreased by 0.6% from the same quarter last year AUTONATION CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM ROSEVILLE due to a decrease of $8,401,000 in Taxable Sales.

AUTONATION HONDA
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES Cash Receipts Quarter Annual
CHEVRON SERVICE STATIONS Roseville -0.6% -2.6%
COSTCO WHOLESALE Placer Countywide Pool -10.0% -18.3%
ECHOPARK AUTOMOTIVE Placer Countywide 1.0% -2.3%
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR Sacramento Valley Region 0.7% -1.1% FUTURE FORD Statewide 0.7% -1.2%

FUTURE NISSAN

GMC RELIABLE
Annualized Percent Change in Sales Tax Cash Receipts

HOME DEPOT

LEXUS OF ROSEVILLE

MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORE

MCKESSON MEDICAL -SURGICAL

NIELLO ACURA

NORDSTROM DEPARTMENT STORE

ROSEVILLE CHEVROLET

ROSEVILLE HYUNDAI

ROSEVILLE KIA

ROSEVILLE TOYOTA & SCION

SAM'S CLUB

TARGET STORES

VANDERBEEK MOTORS

WAL MART STORES
Business Activity Quarter Annual Quarter Annual

4.0% -2.7% -2.1% -1.4%

1.2% 1.6% -1.9% -0.6%
-1.2% -3.1% -9.0% -7.5%

15.3% 2.2% -3.0% -4.0%
General Retail (e.g., dept. stores, misc. retail)
Food Products (e.g., markets and restaurants)
Transportation (e.g., new & used autos, gas stations)
Construction (e.g., retail & wholesale construction)
Business To Business (e.g., IT, industrial equip. etc.) 0.0% 1.1% -4.9% -6.3% TOTAL LOCAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY 1.9% -1.4% -4.3% -3.8%
COUNTYWIDE POOL ACTIVITY -11.5% -18.6% 1.1% -4.6%
City of Roseville
Roseville California
Quarterly Report on Sales Tax and Business Activity
1st Quarter 2024 in Review
-6.0%

0.0%

6.0%

12.0%

18.0%

24.0%

30.0%
Roseville Placer Countywide Statewide
Placer Countywide Pool -10.0% -18.3%
15 Roseville
Annual Per Capita Sales Tax
Adjusted for Inflation
(Constant 2020 $)
City of Roseville
News
Economic Activity: Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 3.5% in the first quarter of 2024. U.S. inflation increased to 3.5% in March of 2024, up 0.3 percentage point from February of 2024.

California's headline inflation decreased to 3.3% year over year as of February of 2024, down from 3.5% in December of 2023. (DIR, BEA, BLS, April Finance Bulletin) Employment: The U.S. unemployment rate increased slightly to 3.8% in March of 2024. California's unemployment rate increased slightly to 5.3% in March of 2024, 1.2 percentage point higher than November of 2022 rate of 4.1%. (EDD, BLS, April Finance Bulletin)
Personal Income:U.S. personal income increased by 4.8% for the first quarter of 2024, compared to same quarter previous year. Compensation of employees increased by 5.6%, while personal current taxes increased by

8.0% from the previous period, resulting in a net gain of 4.4% in disposable income. The increase in personal outlays such as personal consumption and expenditures (PCE), personal interest payments, and personal current transfer payments resulted in a decrease of 20.3% in US personal savings for the first quarter of 2024, compared to same quarter previous year. (BEA)
2020Q1 $387 2021Q1 $385 2022Q1 $428 2023Q1 $415 2024Q1 $385 $53 $75 $73 $71 $57
$2
$2 $2 $2
$2
$45
$32 $36 $36
$35
$20 $23 $24 $22
$22
$117
$123 $134 $126
$119
$45
$40
$48 $48
$48
$105 $91
$111 $109
$103
General Retail
Food Products
Transportation
Construction
Business To Business
Miscellaneous
County Pool
(Cash Basis)
16 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3533
File #:
0709-03
Title:

Community Development Block Grant 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report
Contact:

Kristine Faelz 916-774-5451 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 10.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive public comment on the City of Roseville 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER); and

2. Adopt a resolution approving the 2023 Program Year CAPER and authorize the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City of Roseville for submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.

BACKGROUND
As an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the City is required to annually review and report on the progress it has made in carrying out its Annual Action Plan and progress toward the goals identified in the 2020–2025 Consolidated Plan/Five-Year Strategic Plan. The 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) constitutes the reporting period from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, the fourth year of the five-year 2020-2025 Consolidated Planning period. The CAPER is a requirement of CDBG funding and must be submitted to HUD within 90 days of the completion of the CDBG program year (see Attachment 1). The City of Roseville received an entitlement allocation of $691,234 in CDBG funds for the 2023 Program Year.

During the 2023 program year, HUD-allocated CDBG funds totaling $350,649.62 have benefited 400 low-income persons, and four low-income households in Roseville through housing rehabilitation, public services, and homeless shelter and prevention services. These funds also provide funding for Housing Division administrative expenses to manage these programs. The City received two allocations of CDBG-CV funding during the COVID-19 pandemic, used to prevent, prepare for and respond to the coronavirus. In the 2023-24 program year, 44 individuals received assistance through CDBG-CV public services programs. In this same time period, the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program (federal rental assistance program) assisted 791 households with $10,157,663 million in rental subsidies.

The table below lists the individual activities funded by CDBG exclusively, including the amount expended and number of households assisted during fiscal year 2023-24.

This table lists the activities funded by the CDBG-CV allocations which have expended funds during fiscal year 2023-24.

The draft CAPER document is provided with this report, and includes the following:
progress information towards completion of the City's Five-Year Strategic Plan goals; a description of the resources made available towards goals; information regarding the investment of available resources; an overview of the geographic distribution and location of investments; a tally of the number of households and persons assisted; a list of actions taken to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing; an evaluation of the City’s progress in meeting affordable housing objectives; a description of the activities undertaken with CDBG funds; and a summary of progress on other actions indicated in the Five-Year Strategic Plan and Annual Action Plan.

The CAPER is available for public review during a 15-day public comment period that began on August 31, 2024 and ends at the conclusion of this public hearing on September 18, 2024, prior to the submission deadline. Any public comments received will be included in the CAPER, with City responses, prior to its submittal to HUD for review. To date, no comments have been received.

FISCAL IMPACT
The CDBG funding is provided as a federal grant to the City. These grants are used to offset potential costs to the General Fund and to serve the community. This item does not impact the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The approval of the 2023 CDBG CAPER meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Kristine Faelz, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-319
CDBG 2023 Draft CAPER
RESOLUTION NO. 24-319

APPROVING THE 2023 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND

EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2023 CAPER TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD)

WHEREAS, the 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) has been prepared; and

WHEREAS, a 15 day review and comment period was provided; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held September 18, 2024 at which time the City Council received further public comment on the City’s progress in carrying out its strategic plan and action plan;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report is hereby approved;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute any necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City of Roseville for submittal of the Community Development Block Grant 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)

CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN

2023 CAPER

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING

DIVISION
316 VERNON STREET STE. 150
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678

CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year.

The 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) constitutes the reporting period from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, the fourth year of the five-year 2020-2025 Consolidated Planning period. The City of Roseville received an entitlement allocation of $691,234 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the 2023 Program Year (PY). The City also received $52,282.29 in program income, carried over $488,431.40, for a total program budget of $1,231,947.69. The City expended $350,649.62 leaving a balance of $881,298.07.

Over the last year, the Housing Division has assisted 400 low income persons, and four low income households through the use of CDBG and other housing and community development funds. During fiscal year 2023-2024, $1,516,393.33 from federal, state, and local funding sources was spent for housing rehabilitation, public services, affordable housing, and homeless shelter and prevention services.

Also in the last year, the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program (federal rental assistance program) assisted 791 households with $10,157,663 million in rental subsidies. This includes regular, NED, VASH, Mainstream, Emergency Housing and Project-Based vouchers.

In the 2023 PY, CDBG has benefitted lower income households in Roseville through housing rehabilitation, public services, public facility improvements, and homeless shelter and prevention services. These funds also provide funding for Housing Division administrative expenses to manage these programs.

The City uses other Federal, State and local resources (when available), including Housing Choice Voucher Rental Assistance Contracts, State- administered HOME funds, and local developer contributions to address housing and community development priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan.

The CAPER identifies the programs and activities the City undertook during the 2023 PY to meet underserved needs identified in the Consolidated Plan. In addition, the CAPER discusses the actions the City took to address: lead-based paint hazards; barriers to affordable housing; the needs of households at or below the poverty level; and access to fair housing information.

CAPER 3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

For details on the CDBG-CV program goals, please see Attachment 4: "CR-05 Goals and Outcomes - CV"

CARES Act – CDBG-CV1 and CDBG-CV3

The City is including a brief update regarding CARES Act (CDBG-CV) funding and spending in the CAPER.

On March 27, 2020 the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted to provide emergency assistance and health care response for individuals, families, and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 2, 2020, HUD announced that the City would receive $417,412 of CARES Act CDBG funds, known as CDBG-CV1; on September 11, 2020, the City received notification that it would receive $795,721 of Round 3 of the CARES Act CDBG funds (CDBG-CV3). These funds must be used to prevent, prepare for and respond to COVID-19. A total of three substantial amendments were submitted to the 2019 Annual Action Plan to allocate the CV funds.

Programs implemented and completed with Round 1 of CV funding (CDBG-CV1) included:

- The Small Business Loan program: $501,585 expended of CV1 and CV3 funds (plus $204,070 Entitlement and prior year carryover funds).

The CDBG-CV Small Business Loan program assisted small businesses with loans to address the coronavirus, through the support of employee retention and reduction of job loss due to the pandemic. The City’s Small Business Loan program assisted 23 local business owners with the creation of 58 jobs, and 187 jobs retained. - The Gathering Inn Shelter-in-Place program: $31,632.19 expended. The Shelter-In-Place program provided homeless individuals shelter at their facility as well as St. John's church due to COVID-19. The second site allowed for appropriate social distancing for the homeless individuals staying at the shelter. Forty-one homeless individuals were assisted with the funds for the two month period. This program was completed and reported on in the 2020 CAPER.

Two Notification of Funding Availability (NOFA) notices were released to allocate CDBG-CV3 funds. Programs implemented with CDBG-CV3 funds included:

- Project Roomkey funding support: $24,000 awarded, fully expended. The program housed approximately 60 previously homeless residents at a local hotel, in order to provide a safe and isolated environment due to COVID-19. CDBG-CV3 funds were provided to Placer County towards Project Roomkey for a total of three months. This program was completed and reported on in the 2021 CAPER; a total of 102 beneficiaries were served.
- AMI Housing Emergency Rental Assistance program: $450,000 awarded, $449,995.60 expended. The emergency rental assistance program provided funding for rent and back rent to help prevent homelessness and potential evictions, while also providing families CAPER 4
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

with stability during an uncertain time. Funding for this program is now completed with a total of 242 beneficiaries served. - Placer County Office of Education After-School Care for Homeless Students program: $50,000 awarded, $46,701.03 expended. District staff relayed that students who fall under the McKinney Vento Act (homeless or in Foster Care) required several services due to COVID-

19. These services included the provision of safe, free, and consistent childcare where COVID precautions are being taken, while also supporting families who were impacted by COVID with navigating social services and assisting with accessing permanent housing.

Funding for this program was completed and reported on in the 2022 CAPER; a total of 60 beneficiaries were served. - Project Sentinel’s Fair Housing Services program: $50,000 awarded, fully expended. The Fair Housing Services provider has assisted Roseville residents with comprehensive fair housing services including investigation, counseling and legal referrals for victims of housing discrimination, along with community education and outreach regarding fair housing law and practices. The housing counseling agency has played a role in reducing and preventing evictions by providing Roseville residents with information on tenant rights and fair housing issues. Funding for this program was completed and reported on in the 2022 CAPER; a total of 112 beneficiaries were served. - KidsFirst Rent/Mortgage and Utility Assistance program: $50,000 awarded, $49,592.43 expended. The KidsFirst’s Rental/Mortgage and Utility Assistance Program provided emergency housing/shelter and utility supports for clients affected by COVID-19 impacts, such as job loss and employment reduction. KidsFirst was able to provide rental/mortgage and/or utility assistance to 28 Roseville households. 28 low-income Roseville clients, most at or below 30% AMI and from single-parent households, were able to keep their lights on and avoid eviction. Funding for this program was completed and reported on in the 2022 CAPER; a total of 60 beneficiaries were served.

HUD’s original deadline to spend 80% of CDBG-CV1 and CDBG-CV3 funds within three years of receipt (August 24, 2023) has been revised to require that 100% of the funds be spent by August 2026 and final spending and accomplishments data reported to HUD by November 2026. At the time of this report’s preparation, the City has expended $1,191,824.66 (98%) of CV funds, and anticipates to be on track to meet this goal.

Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.

CAPER 5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Goal Category Source /
Amount
Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected –
Strategic Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected
–
Program
Year
Actual –
Program
Year
Percent
Complete

Addressing
Homelessness

Homeless
CDBG: $15,000

Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit

Persons
Assisted

0 112

Addressing
Homelessness

Homeless

CDBG: $15,000

Homeless Person
Overnight Shelter

Persons
Assisted

1500

26 1.73%

50 26

52%
Addressing
Homelessness
Homeless

CDBG: $14,998.97
Homelessness
Prevention
Persons
Assisted
50 44 88% 0 44
Development of
Affordable
Rental Housing
Affordable
Housing
Rental units
constructed
Household
Housing Unit 50 0 0% 4 0
0%

Provision of
Services for Low-
Income Persons

Non-
Homeless
Special Needs
CDBG: $44,989.17

Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit

Persons
Assisted

4000
288 7.20% 200 288 144%
CAPER 6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Provision of
Services for
Low-Income
Persons
Non-
Homeless
Special
Needs

CDBG-CV:
$80,016.71

Homelessness
Prevention

Persons
Assisted

50 Rehabilitation
of Owner-
Occupied
Housing

Affordable
Housing

CDBG:
$114,917
Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated

Household
Housing Unit

20 4
20% 2 4 200%

Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date

Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.

The City was able to address priority needs in PY 2023, while also continuing to address the coronavirus pandemic, which was a high priority need.

CDBG-CV: The CV specific objectives identified in the Action Plan included the goal of preventing, preparing for and responding to COVID-19.

One way in which the City was able to address this goal through the execution of the Small Business Loan program, where assistance was provided to eligible businesses economically impacted by COVID-19. Other programs that addressed this priority need included: The Gathering Inn Shelter-in-Place program, the AMI Housing Emergency Rental Assistance program, the Placer County Office of Education After-school Care for Homeless Students program, the Placer County Project Roomkey program, Project Sentinel’s Fair Housing Services program, and KidsFirst’s COVID rental/mortgage and utility assistance program. In the 2023 PY, 44 individuals received assistance through CDBG-CV public services programs.

The City improved four housing units using CDBG, addressing moderate to substantial rehabilitation needs. These housing units, occupied by low- income, elderly and disabled persons, will be safer and have the useful life of the major systems extended.

Public services, improved public facilities, and affordable housing activities were provided to 404 individuals. These services meet the basic needs of low-income households, including basic nutrition, and serve to both address and prevent chronic homelessness.

CAPER 7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

The City complied with all Federal Overlay requirements for all projects and activities undertaken during the 2023 PY.

During the 2023 PY the City:
• Continued to strengthen its relationships with private for-profit developers and non-profit housing providers to expand the availability of affordable housing and increase program efficiencies and outcomes. • Continued to participate in the Governance Committee of the “Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras” (HRCS) for the Nevada-Placer Joint Applicant and led efforts for the Placer County Continuum of Care (CoC) in its planning process on ending homelessness and efforts to improve systems through its Built for Zero policy consortium membership. HRCS and the CoC are collaborative associations of service providers and governmental agencies who work together to strengthen the delivery system by integrating and coordinating housing, homeless assistance, and supportive services.
• Participated in the Point in Time Count for South Placer, including the City of Roseville. This was in coordination with the overall HRCS effort, to gain comprehensive information about Placer County homeless individuals and families. • Continued the City’s partnership with Project Sentinel to provide fair housing services to residents of Roseville. Project Sentinel hosted outreach events, opened housing discrimination cases, and responded to calls from residents regarding fair housing rights. • Provided essential services to high need populations including homeless, seniors, disabled persons, youth, and veterans. • Provided funding for Roseville residents unable to pay their rent or utilities due to COVID related reasons, which helped prevent homelessness and potential evictions.

CAPER 8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).

91.520(a)

CDBG
White 357
Black or African American 50
Asian 26
American Indian or American Native 2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 8
American Indian/Alaskan Native & White 5
Total 448
Hispanic 65
Not Hispanic 383

Table 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds

Narrative

Race and ethnicity data is collected from all subrecipients who receive CDBG funding and provide a direct service to low/moderate income persons. Table 2 provides an aggregate of race and ethnicity data for the combined number of people, families, and households served during the program year based on accomplishment data from all CDBG activities reported in HUD’s Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS). Table 2 aggregates the beneficiaries served with both Entitlement as well as CV funds.

Race and origin data from the 2020 Census indicates that 15.8% of Roseville residents identify as Hispanic. Approximately 13% percent of beneficiaries served with 2023 PY CDBG entitlement funds were Hispanic.

Female Head of Households for all activities funded with Entitlement funds totaled 125 beneficiaries, while the aggregate count for people with a disability totaled 145 individuals served.

The City allocated resources on a citywide basis. Resources targeted to the new construction of affordable housing were allocated on a citywide basis in accordance with the City's 10% Affordable Housing Goal and provide for disbursement of affordable housing throughout the City, rather than concentrated within low- income areas of the City.

Resources targeted to special needs populations were also allocated on a Citywide basis, where needs were identified and/or where resources could be coordinated with existing facilities and services.

Activities such as infrastructure improvements are targeted to low-income neighborhoods with older CAPER 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

infrastructure most in need of assistance.

The City assigned the priority for each category of priority needs based on the overall relative need, resources received, and policies established by the City. The City will continue to pursue all available Federal, State and local resources and look to all segments of the community to assist with meeting homeless, affordable housing and community development needs. The City’s greatest obstacle to meeting underserved needs within the community continues to be lack of resources given budget reductions at the Federal, State and local levels.

CAPER 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program
Year
CDBG public - federal 1,231,947.69 350,649.62
CDBG-CV (1 and 3) public - federal 112,677.64 91,369.30 HUD-HCV (Section 8) public - federal 11,335,910.17 11,134,810.87

HOME
State Department of Housing and
Community Development

243,865.92

146,844.44
LOW MOD City as Housing Successor 219,763.92 913,696.55

BEGIN
State Department of Housing and
Community Development

8,562.66

4.63 CALHOME
State Department of Housing and
Community Development

50,557.92

82,498.64

AFFORDABLE

HOUSING

Resale and In Lieu Fees

5,818.28

13,833.42
HOUSING TRUST Developer Subsidy Payoffs 210,935.17 2,699,872.29 Table 3 - Resources Made Available

Narrative

Roseville is an “exception grantee” under the CDBG rules that relate to the use of CDBG funds to benefit low-income areas. Rather than a residential area needing to be comprised of 51% or more low-income households to be considered low-income, areas that are within the upper quartile of low-income households are low-income areas for the purposes of CDBG funding.

The City of Roseville was awarded $691,234 in PY 2023. Total resources available, including unallocated prior year funds of $488,431.40 and program income received of $52,282.29, brought the total funding available to $1,231,647.69. Currently, the City has expended $350,649.62 in PY 2023. The unexpended balance to be carried over totals $881,298.07; this balance is currently committed to activities that are underway (further explanation in CR-45).

CDBG-CV: The City of Roseville was awarded a total of $1,213,133 in CDBG-CV funds ($417,412 from CV1 and $795,721 from CV3). The total expended CV funds are $1,191,824.66 ($91,369.30 in PY 2023), leaving a carry over balance of $21,308.34.

CAPER 10
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned Percentage of
Allocation
Actual Percentage of
Allocation
Narrative Description

Table 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments

Narrative
Based on the 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) data collected by HUD, the City’s “upper quartile” for 2023 was 39.5%.

CAPER 11
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan.

The City has actively sought funding sources in addition to CDBG to leverage its resources. In addition to CDBG, these were some of the funds that were available for use during the program year:

CalHome, HOME, Housing Choice Voucher Section 8 Rental Assistance, Redevelopment Low- Moderate Income Housing Funds, Local Housing Trust Funds and Affordable Housing Funds, Low- income Housing Tax Credits, Tax Exempt Bond financing, State Housing-Related Parks Program Funds, and local developer contributions.

The City does not receive an entitlement allocation of HOME funds. The City must compete annually in order to receive State-administered HOME funds. The City was awarded $1M in 2014 from State HOME funds. This grant was completed in 2017 and the City only continues to administer program income.

The City of Roseville owned land at 120 Pacific Street that was sold to St. Anton and is currently being developed as an 80 unit affordable rental project known as Junction Crossing Apartments.

Junction Crossing is located in a moderate resource area of the City, and will provide studio and one- bedroom apartments with rent affordable to extremely low to low-income households. The development is one of the City of Roseville’s pre-design projects and will address the City’s community development priorities as outlined in the Downtown Specific Plan, as well as local need for affordable housing that serves small 1-2 person households.

The City’s Housing Element notes that existing affordable housing inventory and future affordable housing sites were evaluated to ensure sites planned for future development would not further segregation patterns and trends. As noted, the City’s segregation pattern is low and therefore this evaluation is focused on whether the lower-income inventory is spread throughout the community (not concentrated in particular areas). Deed-restricted affordable housing and high-density housing is distributed throughout the city. Housing capacity at varying levels of affordability is distributed evenly, and is not segregated. Additionally, the City’s existing affordable housing inventory and future affordable housing sites were evaluated to ensure sites planned for future development would not further segregation patterns and trends. To address fair housing issues in disadvantaged community areas, the City is focusing supportive and assertive programs to these areas and also increasing housing opportunities within high opportunity areas of the City.

The City of Roseville owns land at 505 Royer Street that is proposed to be developed as a 57 unit affordable rental project for seniors known as 505 Royer Street Apartments. These units will provide studio and one-bedroom apartments with rent affordable to extremely low to low-income households.

The development is will address the City’s community development priorities as outlined in the CAPER 12
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Downtown Specific Plan, as well as local need for affordable housing that serves senior 1-2 person households.

In the 2023-24 program year, the City provided $978,690 towards Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) services. Of the $978,690 made available, $250,000 was former Redevelopment Low- Moderate Housing funds, while the remaining $728,690 came from the Permanent Local Housing Allocation. These resources were awarded to five local collaborative non-profit grant applications and are providing funding to prevent homelessness (utility bills, healthcare costs, car repair, eviction prevention, etc.) or to help re-house a household (deposit, application, fees, etc.).

HPRR funds also provide job search assistance and food assistance. Nine hundred, ninety-six benefited from the 2023-24 PY HPRR funds; of those, beneficiaries included 63 seniors, 31 veterans, 572 disabled persons, 223 with minor(s) in the household, and 107 Transition Age Youth (TAY).

CAPER 13
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.

One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units

85 9
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units
10 22
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units
15 0
Total 110 31
Table 5 – Number of Households

One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance
30 27
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units
8 0

Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units
2 4
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units
0 0
Total 40 31
Table 6 – Number of Households Supported

Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.

The City exceeded its goals for the production of affordable housing.

The 2023 Action Plan included a project for the development of affordable rental housing. The intended goal of the project was to support new housing development through acquisition of a site to be used for affordable rental housing development for low-income households and individuals. The proposed project would support the development of affordable rental housing goal in the Consolidated Plan, and was estimated to serve four households. Initial delays were experienced because the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) had to be issued multiple times before receiving a proposal that met the project's parameters and requirements. Additionally, since the land acquisition was intended for the future development of affordable housing, a categorical exclusion did not apply. As a result, the project required an Environmental Assessment level of NEPA review, which further contributed to the delays.

Due to delays in project selection and the completion of the Environmental Assessment, the project CAPER 14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

could not be finalized before the end of the program year. Accomplishments will be reported on once the construction of the affordable housing is completed.

The total number of residents served through AMI Housing’s Transitional Housing for Persons with Mental Illness program was less than expected for the program year – nine of 15 expected clients were served. This program has only six slots available at any given time, making it difficult to project how many will be served during the fiscal year. This number is dependent on how long each individual stays in the program. AMI Housing has noticed that residents have been staying longer than in previous years, most likely
due to the lack of available housing vouchers, inflation, and low availability of low income apartment units.

Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.

The City does not expect outcomes for the Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program to be impacted for future action plans. Goals are set based upon past funding history in order to meet the goals identified in the Five Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans.

Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.

Number of Households Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual
Extremely Low-income 0 0
Low-income 4 0
Moderate-income 0 0
Total 4 0
Table 7 – Number of Households Served
CAPER 15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Narrative Information
Extremely low-income and low-income renter households are served through local homeless prevention programs to prevent loss of housing. Housing Choice Vouchers and local affordable housing opportunities are also provided to extremely low-income and low-income renter households, through local inclusionary requirements and tax credit projects.

Low-income homeowners are served through local homeless prevention programs as well. Energy efficiency programs are available through Project GO and Roseville Electric. Roseville Electric recently increased the maximum income requirements for their energy assistance program which allows more households to qualify for this important resource.

Maintenance/habitability programming is available through the Roseville Owner Occupied Rehabilitation (OOR) Program. Low-income homeowners are served through Roseville’s OOR program and local inclusionary requirements that produce affordable ownership opportunities and local secondary mortgage loans.

Moderate income renters are served through affordable housing opportunities under local inclusionary requirements and tax credit projects.

Middle income renters are served through the local rental housing market.

Middle income owners are served through the local inclusionary requirements that produce affordable ownership opportunities and local secondary mortgage loans.

“WORST-CASE NEEDS”: Worst case housing needs are defined as low-income renter households who pay more than half their income for rent, live in seriously substandard housing, which includes homeless people, or have been involuntarily displaced. The City of Roseville served the worst-case needs in PY 2023 by providing the following:

Very Low Income Renters Overpaying (more than 50% of income towards rent) are served through the Housing Choice Voucher program, particularly through the Small Area Fair Market Rents that Roseville adopted in February 2018; this was adopted to update local payment standards to better align with rents by zip code. These households are also served by local homeless prevention funding from the City to reduce potential risk of homelessness. The continued development of new affordable rental units and rental housing opportunities overall are also aimed at the goal of reducing incidents of overpayment within Roseville.

To address substandard housing, the Housing Choice Voucher program and the housing rehabilitation programs ensured that housing met Housing Quality Standards (HQS), State Standards and/or local standards for decent, safe and sanitary housing.

Homeless individuals are served through coordinated efforts of the Roseville Homeless Response Team within the Placer County Continuum of Care. In addition to homeless prevention and rapid CAPER 16
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

rehousing funding that is provided by the City, Roseville Housing Authority received an additional 50 Emergency Housing Vouchers, 100 VASH vouchers and 43 Mainstream vouchers to address the needs of homeless individuals. Additional services and coordination are provided through the Coordinated Entry System and local collaboration on the By Name List.

Persons with Disabilities are served through reasonable accommodations in all of the City’s programs. Additionally, persons with disabilities receive a preference under the City’s Housing Choice Voucher program, and are assisted by the Roseville Owner Occupied Rehabilitation Program and local agencies, including: Project GO, Seniors First, Placer Independent Resource Services (PIRS), and AMI Housing.

Involuntarily Displaced: During the reporting period, there was no involuntary displacement through the City’s programs.

For additional narrative information, please see Attachment 5 - "CR-20 Affordable Housing: Narrative continued".

During the 2023 PY, the Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) increased the total voucher count from 823 to 8 38. This includes HCV vouchers and specialty vouchers EHV, NED, VASH, and Mainstream.

Through the HCV program, 648 households in Roseville and 132 households in Rocklin were supported through rental assistance, a total of 780 families.

During the 2023 PY, RHA paid $71,000 in owner incentives and added 43 new landlords to the HCV program. Roseville Housing Authority’s landlord incentive program is designed to encourage new private landlords to participate in the Housing Choice Voucher Program and create more available units for all voucher holders. Qualifying property owners receive a one-time $1,000 payment each time they enter into a lease and contract with a Housing Choice Voucher holder.

On May 3, 2023, the RHA hosted a Landlord Seminar at the Maidu Community Center for current and prospective property owners who wanted to learn more about participating in the Housing Choice Voucher program. Thirty property owners attended the seminar along with representatives from the Veterans Administration of Northern California (VA) and AMI Housing. The RHA staff covered topics which included the benefits of the voucher program, a review of upcoming policy changes, and a group Q&A session. The seminar was very successful and the RHA is planning to host more landlord events in the future.

The City of Roseville continued implementation of the City's 10% Affordable Housing Goal to increase the number of rental and purchase units affordable to very low, low and moderate-income households, and supported private development of affordable housing using Low-Income Housing CAPER 17
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Tax Credits, Tax Exempt Bond proceeds, Local Housing Trust Funds, and funds from the former Redevelopment Agency.

The housing market has recovered from the slowdown in housing production during the recent recession. Housing vacancy is between 2-3 percent in Roseville, decreasing the supply of affordable housing and increasing rents.

Affordable housing developers have been affected by reductions or eliminations of a variety of funding sources. The City is challenged to develop new affordable housing units given the reduction of resources to subsidize affordable housing production. This reality is further compounded by the impacts of a shrunken housing construction labor force, which leads to competition for labor with the Bay Area and higher overall building costs.

CAPER 18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through:

Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs

The City of Roseville has the following outreach programs to individuals and families who are homeless:

Project Roomkey/Project Homekey: Project Roomkey in Roseville has helped to shelter the most vulnerable people experiencing homelessness during the pandemic. The project is converting to permanent supportive housing (Project Homekey) and will provide 82 residential units.

Drop-In Centers with Services: The Auburn Welcome Center and the Cirby Clubhouse in Roseville are mainly staffed by mental health clinicians and clients that provide homeless individuals and families a place to use computers to search for jobs, housing, and services. This Center also houses the The Gathering Inn Mid Placer Shelter in Auburn. The Gathering Inn South Placer has a Wednesday and Saturday health clinic, and daily provides a clothing closet and laundry facilities in addition to a nightly emergency shelter through the rotation of local churches.

Social Services Unit of the Police Department: In 2016, the police department created the Social Services Unit (SSU). The SSU completes regular outreach and interaction with the local unsheltered population. Through this unit, local County Housing Coordinators, and Roseville Housing staff, individuals who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness are being referred to appropriate services and housing options within the Continuum of Care. These efforts are further augmented through a City-County outreach partnership that utilizes a homeless outreach worker position for South Placer and City efforts towards its own outreach worker.

Point in Time Count: The City of Roseville Social Services Unit and Housing staff led 2024 Point in Time Count efforts throughout South Placer and achieved great success in scheduling training and events for data collection and conducting outreach to individuals otherwise unreachable for the Point In Time Count.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons

Emergency shelter is provided locally through a rotating shelter at local churches, coordinated by The Gathering Inn. This shelter serves an average of 60-90 individuals each evening. Local transitional housing programs through Roseville HomeStart and AMI Housing address much-needed transitional housing needs for families and individuals with mental illness. Lastly, Stand Up Placer provides emergency and transitional housing for domestic violence and human trafficking victims countywide.

CAPER 19
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs Homeless priorities have been established within the framework of the Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras (HRCS) and CA 515 – the Placer County Continuum of Care; the priorities have been set as:
emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, and rapid re-housing. In February 2023, Placer County established a low barrier mobile temporary shelter for people experiencing homelessness. The MTS is located at the Government Center in mid Placer and offers 50 beds. In total throughout the county there are 253 emergency and transitional beds, of which 39 are solely for people fleeing domestic violence. The 214 remaining beds are with Project Roomkey, AMI Housing, Volunteers of America, The Gathering Inn mid Placer, The Gathering Inn South Placer, and in East Placer.

Motel vouchers are available for short-term and extreme circumstances.

Permanent Supportive housing is identified as a high-priority. The need for emergency shelter, mental health services, substance abuse treatment, and emergency food and clothing exists, especially for some subpopulations, such as those with severe mental illness or individuals who are chronically homeless (who have had regular or continued periods of homelessness).

The City of Roseville Housing Division participates in discussions with the Placer County probation staff on better discharge and services planning for existing inmates, including a specific focus on inmates with mental illness. Placer County’s Continuum of Care has implemented a Coordinated Entry System through a central phone line, 211, and is working to increase its use by inmates scheduled to leave jail soon as a means for planning their housing options more proactively. Services staff at the jail are actively working on increased use of the phone line as part of and prior to discharge planning.

Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again
Outreach: The City of Roseville Social Services Unit, Placer County’s Homeless Liaison Team, and The Gathering Inn provide outreach to connect people with services to get them housed.

Rapid Rehousing: Local service providers are applying for and have received Rapid Rehousing and Homeless Prevention funds to assist homeless families and individuals. The City also partners with CAPER 20
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

AMI Housing to provide motel vouchers, security deposits, and rental assistance to assist with rapid rehousing and homelessness prevention.

Housing: In planning the housing needs of these populations the CoC considers the housing needs for both families and individuals. The scattered site housing programs serve both populations. The local housing authorities have also secured and are leasing up VASH Vouchers, Mainstream Vouchers, and Emergency Housing Vouchers to serve individuals and families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. These vouchers have been successful in getting Veterans, families, and chronically homeless individuals housed. Roseville Housing Authority is seeking additional vouchers to serve individuals and families who are homeless.

Coordinated Services: Domestic violence, substance abuse, mental and physical disabilities can all contribute to individuals and family homelessness. There are collaborative community efforts to provide coordinated services to those in need of assistance. The City participates in the Built for Zero effort and leads regular meetings with social service providers and social workers to address barriers to housing of each person on the By Name List.

Unaccompanied youth: Placer County’s Transition to Independence Process (TIP) program serves Transition Aged Youth ages 14 to 24 who are experiencing emotional and/or behavioral difficulties.

Youth receive assistance to make a successful transition into adulthood. The County also has a collaborative called the Transition Aged Youth Housing Collaborative to provide housing assistance for transition aged youth who are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness. The focus of the collaborative is to work with local providers to offer unaccompanied youth the support and services they need.

CAPER 21
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing

The City does not have public housing. The Roseville Housing Authority operates the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Section 8 Rental Assistance Program which serves both the cities of Roseville and Rocklin.

Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership

Not applicable; the City does not have public housing.

Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs

Not applicable. The Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) received a rating of High Performer for the eighteenth consecutive year.

CAPER 22
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i)

As of the fourth year of the five-year plan, there are currently approximately 1,900 affordable units (designated for very-low and low income persons) in the entitlement phase for future production within the next one to four years. The City continues to support opportunities for the redevelopment of underutilized parcels downtown, particularly for high density and affordable housing development. The City also works to increase opportunities for higher density and the use of density bonuses throughout the city.

The Density Bonus Program provides for a minimum 20% to a maximum 50% density bonus in the maximum number of dwelling units, in addition to incentives and/or concessions. The concessions and/or incentives may include reduction in zoning standards, development standards, design requirements, mixed-use zoning, financial assistance, or any other incentive that would reduce costs of the developer.

City Council approved the Douglas Boulevard/Harding Boulevard Corridor Plan which includes a mix of single-family residential properties, single-family residences which have been converted to businesses, aging hotels, and many older commercial properties with large, minimally improved parking fields. The new Commercial Corridor Plan Specific Plan established mixed-use land use and zoning designations to provide more opportunities for redevelopment and reuse, more flexible zoning and development standards, and streamlined approval processes. The City added capacity for a minimum of 600 lower- income residential units, which represents both the total and realistic capacity.

The City has a ministerial approval process, called Objective Design Standards (ODS) for affordable housing projects which meet specified criteria. The streamlined approval process is an opt-in program for developers who must request streamlined ministerial approval at the time of application to the City.

To qualify, the developer must agree to enter into an affordable housing agreement with the City ensuring a minimum of 20% of the units will be affordable to low, very low, or extremely low income households. A qualifying project may opt to be reviewed for conformity with the City’s ODS though the ministerial Building Permit process in lieu of the City’s discretionary Design Review Permit process. The ODS program has been used to approve five affordable housing projects in the last fiscal year allowing the development of over 1,200 units.

Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

Consistent with priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan, during the 2023 PY the City provided funding for the following activities that addressed priority special needs populations:

CAPER 23
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

• AMI Housing provided case management, vouchers and other support services to individuals with mental illness.
• KidsFirst offered intensive social services and individual therapy to children and families with young children.
• Seniors First Meals on Wheels and Saint Vincent de Paul Society’s BAGS program offered nutrition for seniors and disabled persons.
• The Salvation Army offered funding for deposits, and temporary rental and utility assistance to low-income Roseville residents for the prevention of homelessness and maintaining permanent housing stability.
• The 2024 Placer Veterans Stand Down event assembled over 60 service providers to offer free services to military veterans and their family members. • The rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing was addressed through the City’s Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation program. These projects helped maintain the affordable housing stock in the City.
• CARES Act Projects were a high priority need, which entailed activities to Prevent, Prepare for, or Respond to the COVID-19 virus. In the 2023 PY, CDBG-CV funds were utilized for AMI Housing’s COVID Homeless Prevention Assistance program.

The City’s Housing Authority has recently created a quarterly newsletter, which is disbursed to various agencies and participants and also kept in the Housing Division lobby. The newsletter provides a variety of resources available to City residents. For example, the newsletter advertises the Affordable Connectivity Program through the FCC, which is a program to assist low-income households with broadband service to provide high speed connectivity they need for work, school, and healthcare. The newsletter also promotes the City’s Fair Housing Services provider, Project Sentinel, along with a variety of other resources to assist Roseville residents.

Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

The City has taken the following actions toward awareness and elimination of lead-based paint hazards:

The City continued to provide information regarding lead-based paint hazards to Roseville residents and employees.

The City includes, as part of its inspection process for the Owner- Occupied Housing Rehabilitation, and Housing Choice Voucher Section 8 Rental Assistance Programs, an inspection of painted surfaces for the CAPER 24
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

discovery of the potential presence of lead-based paint. If the inspection conducted identifies that a potential hazard exists, the City requires the rehabilitation contractor or homeowner to follow HUD guidelines for mitigation or removal of the lead-based paint hazard.

Grants are available for initial inspection, mitigation, and clearance costs for all of these programs through the City’s Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Program (LBPHRP). Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME funds are set aside to offer these grants; under the Housing Rehabilitation Program, grants are provided for all actual costs of lead-based paint evaluation and reduction activities.

The City also requires that rental property owners properly maintain their dwelling units. Deteriorated surfaces containing lead-based paint posing a hazard to occupants is reportable to the Placer County Environmental Health Department and represents a potential County Health Code violation subject to appropriate mitigation by the rental property owner.

The City continues to fund the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Program to comply with the 1992 Housing and Community Development Act (Title X) in addressing potential lead-based paint hazards.

Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

During the 2023 PY the City took the following actions to reduce the incidence of poverty within the City's jurisdiction:

- The City continued to promote the Family Self Sufficiency Program for Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) participants and actively recruited new households to participate. - The City frequently posts available jobs, job fairs, training and educational opportunities to the Housing Authority’s Facebook page as well as notifying participants by email. - The City continued its policy of promoting a jobs/housing balance to ensure a variety of jobs with varying levels of skill and training and development of affordable housing to all income groups. - The Senior Nutrition Program and the BAGS program supported the nutritional needs of persons in poverty. Due to coronavirus, the Meals on Wheels program was modified in accordance with the CDC and local guidelines to ensure the nutritional needs of the low-income residents of Roseville continued to be met. The program transitioned from providing one hot meal daily to seniors, to instead providing five home-delivered meals three times per week. Those experiencing very low food security also receive supplemental groceries. Staff and volunteers also conduct wellness phone calls and provide information and assistance to those seeking community resources.

Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

With regard to the distribution of affordable housing, it has been the goal of the City’s 10% affordable housing program to distribute new, affordable housing throughout the City by requiring that each specific plan provide 10% of their total housing units as affordable to low and middle-income households.

CAPER 25
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

The City has continued to rely on the Housing Division to administer its housing programs and implement housing policies. The Housing Division administers rental assistance, housing rehabilitation, and new construction projects. The Housing Division also provides resource information and referral to residents, including referrals to homeless assistance, fair housing, legal services, etc.

The programs administered by the Housing Division are funded through a variety of public and private sources, including Federal, State, City and private developer funding under local affordable housing requirements.

The City continues to work toward a regional approach to serving the needs of residents through the Continuum of Care on a countywide basis.

Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

The Housing Division acts as a liaison between other public and private agencies to maximize service to Roseville residents and prevent duplication of services.

Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) The City displays its Fair Housing Banner in a prominent location within the Housing Division office, as well as at functions throughout the year where the City is represented. The banner reads, “Fair Housing is Everyone’s Right” in both English and Spanish and also includes the Equal Housing Opportunity logo.

Fair Housing pamphlets and literature are also made available to the public. Housing Division Supervisory staff continues to work with other staff members to further their knowledge of fair housing laws and issues, including making pamphlets and news articles available to staff. Staff regularly receives Fair Housing and diversity training. Housing staff attended Fair Housing Training presented by Project Sentinel in April 2024.

Housing Division staff continues to record all housing complaints, including those regarding discrimination and works cooperatively with the local Legal Services branch. In the case of alleged discrimination, residents are provided with information regarding fair housing law, a HUD discrimination complaint form, and referrals to legal services, the State Department of Fair Housing and Employment, and other appropriate agencies.

The City’s Housing Authority continues to request and receive VASH, Mainstream and Project- based vouchers. During the 2023 PY, the Housing Authority was awarded 10 VASH vouchers, which serve veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.

CAPER 26
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

The 2020 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, or AI, was conducted as a joint effort for the Sacramento Valley region, including Roseville. According to the AI, Roseville is one of several cities in the region where residents are most likely to have access to economically strong neighborhoods.

Additionally, residents of Roseville are one of several cities in the region where residents are most likely to have access to proficient schools. Survey results found that residents living in Roseville tended to rate each healthy neighborhood indicator (ease of getting to the places they want to go using their preferred transportation option, convenient access to grocery stores, job opportunities, and health care facilities, and park and recreation facilities of similar quality to other neighborhoods) higher than the regional average. Various recommendations for the City were identified in the AI adopted in 2020, including:
expanding affordable rental opportunities; increasing homeownership among under-represented groups; and focusing on a range of equity issues.

In order to address these recommendations, the City has:

- Worked to expand equity in access to economic opportunity: One of the strategies in the AI to address fair housing barriers included the goal to expand equity in access to economic opportunity. In order to address this goal, the City has partnered with Placer County Adult System of Care (ASOC) with Mainstream Vouchers and also partnered with ASOC’s Full Service Partnership Program with Project Based Vouchers. The City administered Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) program partners with mental health, recovery, and disability service providers to reduce housing instability.
- Administered the Family Self Sufficiency Program (FSS) for Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) participants. When a participant of the program receives an increase in income, any rent increases are saved in an escrow account that they will receive once they successfully complete the program. In the 2023 PY, 30 participants enrolled in the program, and seven graduated.

Roughly $59,000 was disbursed between the seven graduates. Participants assisted included 12 female head of householders, and five Hispanic households.

(The following is found in the “add text” section)

- Expanded affordable rental opportunities by increasing accessible and affordable housing opportunities. The City has affordable housing development agreements with 30 multi-family and senior complexes. Out of the total 2,310 units, 483 are accessible units. Of the 21 multi- family apartments, 16 have 3-bedroom units, and two have 4-bedroom units to accommodate larger families.
- Contracted with a fair housing services provider, Project Sentinel. This organization has continued to work in conjunction with the City to provide comprehensive fair housing services of investigation, counseling and legal referrals for victims of housing discrimination. During PY 2023, Project Sentinel provided valuable community education and outreach regarding fair housing law and practices to Roseville residents, including tenants and landlords. More specifically, Project Sentinel accomplished the following actions:
o In the 2023 PY, outreach was directed to Roseville tenants, landlords, the public, as well as service providers, including:
 In April 2024, Project Sentinel conducted an in-person presentation for City of CAPER 27
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Roseville Housing Authority staff and residents on Fair Housing Rights and the services Project Sentinel can provide to residents in need. The presentation included an overview of applicable California and Federal fair housing law and protected classes. This event allowed the organization to connect with local renters, property managers and owners in how they can protect themselves and create better practices when managing fair housing concerns. There were approximately 16 attendees.
 In April 2024, Project Sentinel presented at a local non-profit organization, Stand Up Placer, to provide information on Fair Housing rights related to Domestic Violence survivors. Approximately 25 people were in attendance.  In May 2024, Project Sentinel ran a newspaper ad in the local newspaper Gold Country Media and ran radio ads on two radio stations in English and Spanish.

The radio stations cover the greater Sacramento region including Roseville, and the newspaper reaches Roseville residents. The organization approximates that the reach for these ads was at around 700 people.
o Received 12 calls and assisted 17 persons. The major basis for complaint was Disability and Source of Income.
o Opened 11 cases and conducted several audits based on source of income. o Project Sentinel did not have any HUD or CRD referrals this last fiscal year. They were able to provide extended counseling to several clients and opened several cases for testing investigation.
o Currently the organization has brochures available in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Tagalog, and Vietnamese.

Through the actions listed above, the City is providing valuable services to address various issues of discrimination found in the community. The programs and progress directed through the City’s Housing Division, in conjunction with the outreach efforts conducted by Project Sentinel, is translating to more residents becoming aware of services as well as rights when it comes to fair housing.

CAPER 28
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements

Each year, the City conducts a risk assessment of subrecipients to determine the need for monitoring. All subrecipients are subject to a minimum of desk monitoring. If the risk assessment reveals the need, on- site monitoring is also conducted. Staff will monitor 2023 PY subrecipients in the fall and winter of 2024.

Additionally, individualized technical assistance was provided to subrecipients on an as-needed basis throughout a program year.

Roseville seeks to ensure minority business owners are included in any outreach and comprehensive planning requirements. In order to do so, public notices are translated and offered in Spanish, and any request for additional translation is available for those who request it. All organizations applying for funding are provided technical assistance to ensure they have info they need to apply. Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA) are provided to a variety of groups to encourage diverse populations have access to the information, including the Placer County Continuum of Care, the Latino Leadership Council, and Placer Collaborative Network. NOFA’s are also posted in public locations such as City libraries. Any Requests for Proposals released by the City are noticed in the local newspaper and posted on the City’s website in order to ensure a variety of submittals are attained. Contracts include language regarding equal opportunity and nondiscrimination, and contracts requiring subcontractors are encouraged to reach out to minority and women owned businesses for the work to be subcontracted.

Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)

Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.

The City published a notice in the Roseville Press Tribune on August 30, 2024, announcing the availability of the CAPER for public review, the public comment period, to whom comment should be submitted, and the scheduled public hearing. The notice was published in English and in Spanish. Notice was also published on the City’s website.

The public will be invited to comment during a minimum 15-day period, August 31, 2024 through September 18, 2024. WILL NOTE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED.

The Roseville City Council reviews, conducts the public hearing, and approves the CAPER prior to submission to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

CAPER 29
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

The City notified public service agencies directly via an email to several local non-profit collaborations regarding the availability of the 2023 CAPER and attached electronic copies/links of the public review/hearing notice and Draft document. Agencies notified included the Placer Collaborative Network, the Placer Consortium on Homelessness, the Latino Leadership Council, and the Health Education Council. The Latino Leadership Council is a local nonprofit that provides services to underserved Spanish-speaking populations by connecting Latinos to a multitude of health, education, and youth development services. The Health Education Council serves residents in under-served communities, particularly minorities. These organizations all provide services to minorities and persons with disabilities. The City encourages all agencies who receive these types of notices to share this information with their clients and other organizations who may be interested in the Draft CAPER.

A public hearing will be held before the City Council on September 18, 2024 to review the City’s progress in meeting its Housing and Community Development needs. The public hearing will allow additional opportunity for the public to comment on the 2023 CAPER. WILL NOTE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED.

During the public hearing on September 18, 2024, City Council members will be given the opportunity to ask questions. WILL NOTE ANY QUESTIONS ASKED BY COUNCIL.

In order to address access to public meetings for persons with disabilities, Roseville Transit offers ADA Paratransit for ADA-certified passengers. Additionally, all information is available in an accessible format to persons with visual impairment upon request. All public notices state:

The hearing will be available for live access on Comcast 14, Consolidated Communications 73, AT&T U-verse, and the City’s YouTube channel. All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard.

Meeting facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities. By request, translation services and documents, as well as alternative accessible document formats are available to persons with varying language needs or disabilities. To arrange an alternative agenda document format or to arrange aid or services to modify or accommodate persons with a disability to participate in a public meeting, please contact the City of Roseville by calling 916-774-5200 (voice) or 916-774- 5220 (TDD) a minimum of two business days prior to the meeting.

The CAPER will be submitted to HUD by September 30, 2024 for review.

CAPER 30
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.

The Johnson Pool ADA improvements project with the City’s Parks and Recreation Department experienced several delays due to issues with procuring bids. In the Fall of 2022, the project went out to bid, with only one bid received which was far above the project budget. The project scope was then reduced and rebid in early 2023, but no bids were received. Finally, the project scope and design was revised to combine what was originally planned as two separate phases of work. When the project went out to bid again in the winter of 2024, bids were received, and a contractor was selected. The accessibility improvements project to Johnson Pool is currently underway; accomplishments will be entered upon project completion.

The 2023 Action Plan included a project for the development of affordable rental housing to provide funding assistance to developers of rental housing affordable to low-income households. The NOFA requested proposals for the acquisition of property to be used for the future development of affordable housing. The NOFA was released several times before a proposal was received that fit within the parameters and requirements of the project. Since the acquisition of the land will ultimately be developed for use as affordable housing, a categorical exclusion did not apply, and therefore the project was subject to an Environmental Assessment level of NEPA review. Due to the delays with project selection and the timing of completion of the Environmental Assessment, the project was unable to be finalized prior to the end of the program year. Once the Authority to Use Grant Funds is received, funds will be drawn for the acquisition of the land to be used for the development of affordable rental housing. Accomplishments will be entered once the project is completed. As a result of these experiences, the City will attempt to address potential timing issues that may arise with similar projects in the future.

CDBG-CV: Report on impacts of COVID pandemic on formula CPD programs:

Due to the pandemic, as part of the 2019 and 2020 Annual Action Plan, the City added priorities and objectives in order to prevent, prepare for and respond to coronavirus. There was no discontinuation of any non-CV related activities, and Annual Action Plan goals continued to be met. With the release of the NOFA for 2023 CDBG Entitlement funds, the City received applications for eight public service programs, and no capital improvements project applications. The lack of capital improvement project applications may be because subrecipients are still working to spend the additional COVID-related funds they received. Finally, several factors affected the spending of funds for all current year projects, including procurement issues and project delays (as discussed in CR-45). As a result, not all of the City's available grant funds were expended during this program year. As for CV specific programs, the City is on track to expend the COVID related funds by deadline of 2026.

The coronavirus pandemic had an impact on several of the CDBG public services programs, including CAPER 31
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Seniors First, Salvation Army, Placer Veterans Stand Down, and KidsFirst. Due to the pandemic, Seniors First made a change to their Meals on Wheels program, shifting their five day a week meal delivery to three times a week, with the inclusion of frozen meals along with fresh meals. This helped reduce the number of visits to homes to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus and ensure as much social distancing as possible. The Salvation Army noted impacts to their homeless prevention and rapid rehousing program due to cost-of-living increases and the impact of unemployment due to COVID-19, which affected the intervention needed to prevent homelessness. Placer Veterans Stand Down stated that their organization noticed decreased funding opportunities due to the pandemic, and they also encountered an increase in veterans attending their annual event who were impacted by COVID and its consequences on the economy. Lastly, KidsFirst experienced an immediate increase in the number of referrals and requests for services due to the pandemic.

Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?
No

[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.

CAPER 32
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

CR-58 – Section 3
Identify the number of individuals assisted and the types of assistance provided

Total Labor Hours CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF
Total Number of Activities 1 0 0 0 0
Total Labor Hours 0
Total Section 3 Worker Hours 0
Total Targeted Section 3 Worker Hours 0
Table 8 – Total Labor Hours

Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Public Housing Targeted Workers

Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Other Funding Targeted Workers.

Direct, on-the job training (including apprenticeships).

Indirect training such as arranging for, contracting for, or paying tuition for, off-site training.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance, coaching).

Outreach efforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts.

Division of contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate participation by Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with assistance in seeking employment including: drafting resumes,preparing for interviews, finding job opportunities, connecting residents to job placement services.

Held one or more job fairs.

Provided or connected residents with supportive services that can provide direct services or referrals.

Provided or connected residents with supportive services that provide one or more of the following: work readiness health screenings, interview clothing, uniforms, test fees, transportation.

Assisted residents with finding child care.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend community college or a four year educational institution.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend vocational/technical training.

Assisted residents to obtain financial literacy training and/or coaching.

Bonding assistance, guaranties, or other efforts to support viable bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with training on computer use or online technologies.

Promoting the use of a business registry designed to create opportunities for disadvantaged and small businesses.

Outreach, engagement, or referrals with the state one-stop system, as designed in Section 121(e)(2) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

Other.

Table 9 – Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CAPER 33
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

Narrative

Section 3 is a provision of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated by CDBG funds shall, to the greatest extent feasible, and consistent with existing Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, be directed to low- and very low-income persons, particularly those who are recipients of government assistance for housing, in addition to business concerns which provide economic opportunities to low- and very low-income persons.

One capital improvements project slated to be completed within the 2023 PY was an ADA improvements project to Johnson Pool. As outlined in CR-45, the project faced delays primarily due to challenges in securing bids and managing budget constraints. Section 3 requirements and information were detailed in the bid advertisement and bid documents, in the contract, and communicated during the pre-construction meeting. Certification forms and relevant information regarding efforts has been provided to those working on the project. The City is actively collaborating with the contractor and subcontractors to ensure compliance with Section 3 throughout the duration of the project. Section 3 labor hours and applicable efforts will be reported on once accomplishments are reported.

Although the Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation program projects do not fall under Section 3 regulations, due to the total assistance provided not exceeding the $200,000 threshold – one contractor who completed a single-family rehabilitation project in the 2023 program year is registered as a Section 3 business. This contractor learned about the program through an advertisement on the City’s website.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3548
File #:
0215-07
Title:

Electric Pickle - Fee Deferral
Contact:

Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 10.2.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a fee deferral for Electric Pickle, a new construction restaurant, entertainment, and outdoor pickle ball facility, at 340 Conference Center Drive, in the amount of approximately $620,600, plus interest, until final of building permit/building occupancy.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville offers a fee deferral program for certain City controlled impact fees through the Economic Development Department as an incentive to encourage development. Fee deferrals $100,000 or greater require City Council approval and that development impact fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Building Permit Occupancy/Final permit as applicable to each permit.

The Economic Development Department received the attached application from Electric Pickle OpCo LLC on August 6, 2024, requesting approval of a fee deferral for Electric Pickle. Electric Pickle, a
restaurant, entertainment, and outdoor pickle ball facility will be located within the North
Central Roseville Specific Plan area, Parcel 40, at 340 Gibson Drive. As shown on the attached plans, the project includes construction of an 12,700 two-story restaurant, 1,500 square foot cabana building with bar, multiple shade structures, nine outdoor pickle ball courts, and bocci ball courts and other outdoor amenities. The project received Planning entitlement approval on September 14, 2023 (PL23-0052).

Fee estimates have been prepared for the various buildings/building permits for Electric Pickle, based on the fees for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Only City controlled impact fees are eligible for deferral. The fee types and consolidated amounts are identified below:

Deferrable Fee
Total Deferrable Fee
Public Facilities Fee
$ 22,109.16
Local Sewer Fee
$ 14,557.28
Water Connection Fee - Domestic (2")
$ 65,285.40
Water Pressure Zone Fee
$ 40,649.40
Drainage Fees
$ 25,006.09
Traffic Mitigation Fee
$ 394,686.21
Solid Waste Fee
$ 4,815.08
Electric Backbone Fee Three Phase
(per AK)
$ 53,503.91
Total Fees Eligible for Deferral
$ 620,612.52

The list of fees eligible for deferral has been vetted by the applicable City departments and only those determined to have no impact to the budget have been included above. As shown above, the total eligible fee deferral for the project is approximately $620,600. The total amount of deferrable fees could change if building permits are pulled outside of FY2024-25, however, the list of deferrable fees would not change following Council action on this item.

Pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code (RMC) Section 4.04.040, all non-residential fee deferrals greater than $100,000 dollars are required to be approved by the City Council. Council is requested to approve a resolution allowing the request fees to be deferred to building final/ occupancy. In an effort to cover lost interest resulting from the City fee deferral, there is an interest charge of 1.35% that will be paid upon building permit occupancy or the issuance of a final permit for each project. The RMC additionally identifies an administrative processing fee of $981.59 to be charged per building permit to cover staff's time of processing requests.

FISCAL IMPACT
The requested deferral will not result in a loss of impact fees nor earned interest income. The development impact fees are required to be paid prior to issuance of building permit occupancy/final permit. To ensure that the City will not have any loss of interest income, the RMC requires that interest be charged on monies deferred. Specifically, the City's Finance Department identified that the City's ten-year average pooled interest rate is approximately 1.35%. Therefore, interest at a rate of 1.35% will be charged on the monies deferred to cover the City's cost of loss of interest income on the fee deferral. Additionally, the RMC identifies an administrative processing fee of $981.59 to be charged to each building permit.

The City's fee deferral program is an important economic development tool that facilitates new development that may not otherwise be financially feasible without this program. As a result, this program has the potential to increase impact fees and investment that directly increase property values that may not otherwise occur if this program was not available. Construction of this project will create temporary construction jobs and permanent full and/or part time jobs, generate sales tax revenue to the City, and provide a venue for hosting national and regional tournaments which will result in additional economic impacts to the city.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15061(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a fee deferral meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-326
Application
Electric Pickle Concept Plans
RESOLUTION NO. 24-326

APPROVING FEE DEFERRALS FOR THE ELECTRIC PICKLE PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has offered a fee deferral program through the Economic Development Department since the mid 1990’s to encourage development; and

WHEREAS, the Economic Development Department received a request from Electric Pickle Opco LLC, requesting a fee deferral of certain City controlled impact fees; and

WHEREAS, the fee deferral program and California Government Code Section 53083 require City Council approval, and the program requires that the deferred fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Building Permit Occupancy/Final permit as applicable to each permit; and

WHEREAS, on September 18, 2024, the City Council for the City of Roseville held a public hearing, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53083, on a fee deferral to Electric Pickle Opco LLC; and

WHEREAS, staff recommends City Council approve the City fee deferral to building permit occupancy/final permit of approximately $620,612.52, plus interest, for the Electric Pickle project; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville after holding a public hearing that the City fee deferral to building permit occupancy/final permit in the approximate amount of $620,612.52, plus interest, for the Electric Pickle project is hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

A920

EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES
1 PERSPECTIVE AT FRONT / ENTRY (SOUTH)
CONSULTANTS:

CERTIFICATION:

Project No.

Drawn By
Checked By
Date
Revision Date
THIS DRAWING IS PART OF A SET OF WORKING DRAWINGS. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS DRAWING MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE BALANCE OF THE DRAWINGS, AND CANNOT BE TAKEN AS A STAND-ALONE INSTRUCTION. ALL GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS APPLY TO EVERY SHEET IN THIS SET.

MXR
JED
Contact: Paul Frederick
12101 S. Crenshaw Blvd. #400
Hawthorne, CA 90250
[email protected]
310-331-8232
10503 ELECTRIC PICKLE ROSEVILLE
2023/08/18
PLAN CHECK #: CASE #:
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build PLAN CHECK #: __________ TRACKING #: __________
340 Conference Center Drive
Roseville, CA 95678

38.778666, -121.270030

PROGRESS

DRAWINGS

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
DR Comments 01 8/18/23
2 PERSPECTIVE AT FRONT (SOUTH)
CONSULTANTS:

CERTIFICATION:

Project No.

38.778666, -121.270030

PROGRESS

DRAWINGS

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
DR Comments 01 8/18/23
A921

EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES
1 PERSPECTIVE AT REAR (FROM MULTI-USE TRAIL) (NORTH)
2 AERIAL PERSPECTIVE FROM EAST

CONSULTANTS:

CERTIFICATION:

Project No.

38.778666, -121.270030

PROGRESS

DRAWINGS

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
DR Comments 01 8/18/23
A922

EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES
1 PERSPECTIVE FROM WEST
2 AERIAL PERSPECTIVE FROM SOUTHWEST

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:

File #:

Title:

Infill Parcel 198 (100 Stonehouse Court) WellSpace Health - Rezone Contact:

Meeting Date: 9/18/2024
Item #: 10.3.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
This item has been moved to the October 2, 2024 City Council Meeting.

BACKGROUND

FISCAL IMPACT

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

Respectfully Submitted,

Roseville City CouncilSeptember 18, 2024

Roseville City Council
September 18, 2024