Roseville City Council
October 2, 2024

f) There are no Habitat Conservation Plans; Natural Community Conservation Plans; or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans that apply to the project site.

V. Cultural Resources
As described within the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, the Roseville region was within the territory of the Nisenan (also Southern Maidu or Valley Maidu). Two large permanent Nisenan habitation sites have been identified and protected within the City’s open space (in Maidu Park). Numerous smaller cultural resources, such as midden deposits and bedrock mortars, have also been recorded in the City. The gold rush which began in 1848 marked another settlement period, and evidence of Roseville’s ranching and mining past are still found today. Historic features include rock walls, ditches, low terraces, and other remnants of settlement and activity. A majority of documented sites within the City are located in areas designated for open space uses.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an historic
resource pursuant to in
Section 15064.5?
X
b) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to Section
15064.5?
X
c) Disturb any human
remains, including those
interred outside of
dedicated cemeteries?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts to cultural resources is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above. The Archaeological, Historic, and Cultural Resources section of the City of Roseville General Plan also directs the proper evaluation of and, when feasible, protection of significant resources (Policies 1 and 2).

There are also various federal and State regulations regarding the treatment and protection of cultural resources, including the National Historic Preservation Act and the Antiquities Act (which regulate items of significance in history), Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code (which regulates the treatment of human remains) and Section 21073 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code (regarding Tribal Cultural Resources). The CEQA Guidelines also contains specific sections, other than the checklist items, related to the treatment of effects on historic resources.

Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, if it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts to be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (Section 21083.2 (a), (b), and (c)). A historical resource is a resource listed, or determined to be eligible for listing, in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR)

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

(Section 21084.1); a resource included in a local register of historical resources (Section 15064.5(a)(2)); or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant (Section 15064.5 (a)(3)). Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 requires evaluation of historical resources to determine their eligibility for listing on the CRHR.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b and d) No cultural resources are known to exist on the Project site since the site has already experienced ground disturbance; however, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to cultural resources, should any be found on -site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. With mitigation, project- specific impacts are less than significant.
c) No paleontological resources are known to exist on the project; however, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to such resources, should any be found on -site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. With mitigation; project-specific impacts are less than significant.

VI. Energy
Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or operation?
X
b) Conflict with or obstruct a
state or local plan for
renewable energy or
energy inefficiency?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

Established in 2002, California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) currently requires that 33 percent of electricity retail sales by served by renewable energy resources by 2020, and 50 percent by 2030. The City published a Renewables Portfolio Standard Procurement Plan in June 2018, and continues to comply with the RPS reporting and requirements and standards. There are no numeric significance thresholds to define “wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary” energy consumption, and therefore significance is based on CEQA Guidelines checklist items a and b, above, and by the use of expert judgment supported by facts, relying on the policies, codes, and regulations adopted by the City and by regulatory agencies which relate to energy. The analysis considers compliance with regulations and standards, project design as it relates to energy use (including transportation energy), whether the project will result in a substantial unplanned demand on the City’s energy resources, and whether the project will impede the ability of the City to meet the RPS standards.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a & b) Roseville Electric provided an estimate energy usage for the Project, based on data from a similar use.

The total annual kilowatt hour (kWh) use for the site is approximately 155,520 kWh, with an average monthly usage of 12,960 kWh. As stated in the thresholds of significance section, there is no stated numeric significance threshold to define “wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary”; however, Roseville Electric has reviewed the proposed project and found that the Department has adequate capacity to serve the site. The project would consume energy both during project construction and during project operation.

During construction, fossil fuels, electricity, and natural gas would be used by construction vehicles and equipment. However, the energy consumed during construction would be temporary, and would not represent a significant demand on available resources. There are no unusual project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment or methods that would be less energy-efficient or which would be wasteful.

The completed project would consume energy related to building operation, exterior lighting, landscape irrigation and maintenance, and vehicle trips to and from the use. In accordance with California Energy Code Title 24, the project would be required to meet the Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This includes standards for water and space heating and cooling equipment; insulation for doors, pipes, walls, and ceilings; and appliances, to name a few. The project would also be eligible for rebates and other financial incentives from both the electric and gas providers for the purchase of energy-efficient appliances and systems, which would further reduce the operational energy demand of the project. The project was distributed to both PG&E and Roseville Electric for comments, and was found to conform to the standards of both providers; energy supplies are available to serve the project.

The project is consistent with the existing CC land use designation in the General Plan, as the project is not located within a Specific Plan area. The General Plan EIR included assessment of energy impacts for the entire City. The analysis included consideration of transportation energy, and evaluated walkability, alternative transportation modes, and the degree to which the mix and location of uses would reduce vehicle miles traveled in the plan area. The EIR also included a citywide assessment of energy demand based on the existing and proposed land uses within the City and Specific Plan. Impacts related to energy consumption were found to be less than significant. The project is consistent with the existing land use designation, and therefore is consistent with the current citywide assessment of energy demand, and will not result in substantial unplanned, inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy; impacts are less than significant.

VII. Geology and Soils
As described in the Safety Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, there are three inactive faults (Volcano Hill, Linda Creek, and an unnamed fault) in the vicinity, but there are no known active seismic faults within Placer County. The last seismic event recorded in the South Placer area occurred in 1908, and is estimated to have been at least a 4.0 on the Richter Scale. Due to the geographic location and soil characteristics within the City, the General Plan indicates that soil liquefaction, landslides, and subsidence are not a significant risk in the area.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial
adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
i) Ruptures of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or
based on other
substantial evidence of a
known fault?
(Refer to
Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication

42.)

X
ii) Strong seismic ground
shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground
failure, including
liquefaction?
X
iv) Landslides? X
b) Result in substantial soil
erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
X
c) Be located in a geological
unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become
unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially
result in on or off-site
landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
X
d) Be located on expansive
soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct
or indirect risks to life or
property?
X
e) Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater
disposal systems where
sewers are not available
for the disposal of
wastewater?
X
f) Directly or indirectly
destroy a unique
paleontological resource or
site or unique geological
feature?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to geology and soils is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–f listed above. Regulations applicable to this topic include the Alquist-Priolo Act, which addresses earthquake safety in building permits, and the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act, which requires the state to gather and publish data on the location and risk of seismic faults. The Archaeological, Historic, and Cultural Resources section of the City of Roseville General Plan also directs the proper evaluation of and, when feasible, protection of significant archeological resources, which for this evaluation will include paleontological resources (Policies 1 and 2). Section 50987.5 of the California Public Code Section is only applicable to public land; this section prohibits the excavation, removal, destruction, or defacement/injury to any vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints or other paleontological feature.

The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (RMC Ch.9.80) and Design/Construction Standards (Resolution 07 -107) will prevent significant impacts related to checklist item b. The Ordinance and standards include permit requirements for construction and development in erosion-prone areas and ensure that grading activities will not result in significant soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The use of septic tanks or alternative waste systems is not permitted in the City of Roseville, and therefore no analysis of criterion e is necessary.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic shaking, ground failure or landslides.
i–iii) According to United States Geological Service mapping and literature, active faults are largely considered to be those which have had movement within the last 10,000 years (within the Holocene or Historic time periods)
1 and there are no major active faults in Placer County. The California Geological Survey has prepared a map of the state which shows the earthquake shaking potential of areas throughout California based primarily on an area’s distance from known active faults. The map shows that the City lies in a relatively low - intensity ground- shaking zone. Commercial, institutional , and residential buildings as well as all related infrastructure are required, in conformance with Chapter 16, Structural Design Requirem ents, Division IV, Earthquake Design of the California Building Code, to lessen the exposure to potentially damaging vibrations through seismic-resistant design. In compliance with the Code, all structures in the Project area would be well- built to withstand ground shaking from possible earthquakes in the region; impacts are less than significant. iv) Landslides typically occur where soils on steep slopes become saturated or where natural or manmade conditions have taken away supporting structures and vegetation. The existing and proposed slopes of the project site are not steep enough to present a hazard during development or upon completion of the project. In addition, measures would be incorporated during construction to shore minor slopes and prevent potential earth movement. Therefore, impacts associated with landslides are less than significant. b) Grading activities will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction and over -covering of soils associated with site preparation (grading and trenching for utilities). Grading activities for the project will be limited to the project site. Grading activities require a grading permit from the Engineering Division. The grading permit is reviewed for compliance with the City’s Improvement Standards, including the provision of proper drainage, appropriate dust control, and erosion control measures. Grading and erosion control measures will be incorporated into the required grading plans and improvement plans. Therefore, the impacts associated with disruption, displacement, and compaction of soils associated with the project are less than significant.

1 United States Geological Survey, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/glossary/?term=active%20fault, Accessed January 2016

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

c, d) A review of the Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Placer County, accessed via the Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/), indicates that the soils on the site are Cometa-Ramona sandy loams, 1 to 5 percent slopes, which are not listed as geologically unstable or sensitive. f) No paleontological resources are known to exist on the project site per the GP EIR; however, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to such resources, should any be found on- site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. The project will not result in any new impacts beyond those already discussed and disclosed in the GP EIR; project-specific impacts are less than significant.

VIII. Greenhouse Gases
Greenhouse gases trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere. The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) that enter the atmosphere because of human activities are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane ( CH4), nitrous oxide ( N2O), and fluorinated gases. As explained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency 2, global average temperature has increased by more than 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since the late 1800s, and most of the warming of the past half century has been caused by human emissions. The City has taken proactive steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which include the introduction of General Plan policies to reduce emissions, changes to City operations, and climate action initiatives.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have
a significant impact on the
environment?
X
b) Conflict with an applicable
plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

In Assembly Bill 32 (the California Global Warming Solutions Act), signed by Governor Schwarzenegger of California in September 2006, the legislature found that climate change resulting from global warming was a threat to California, and directed that “the State Air Resources Board design emissions reduction measures to meet the statewide emissions limits for greenhouse gases . . .”. The target established in AB 32 was to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. CARB subsequently prepared the Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan) for California, which was approved in 2008. The Scoping Plan provides the outline for actions to reduce California’s GHG emissions, and has been updated twice.

The current 2017 Scoping Plan updated the target year from 2020 to 2030, based on the targets established in Senate Bill 32 (SB 32). SB 32 was signed by the Governor on September 8, 2016, to establish a reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Critically, the 2017 Scoping Plan also sets the path toward compliance with the 2050 target embodied within Executive Order S -3-05 as well. According to the 2017 Scoping Plan the

2 http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/overview.html, Accessed January 2016

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

statewide 2030 target is 260 million metric tons. The Scoping Plan recommends an efficiency target approach for local governments for 2030 and 2050 target years.

The Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) recommends that thresholds of significance for GHG be related to statewide reduction goals and has adopted thresholds of significance which take into account the 2030 reduction target. The thresholds include a de minimis and a bright-line maximum threshold, as well as residential and non-residential efficiency thresholds. However, the City developed its own thresholds as part of the 2035 General Plan Update project approved in July 2020. The justification for the City’s thresholds is contained within the General Plan EIR. The thresholds were developed based on statewide emissions data adjusted for relevant local conditions and land uses. The significance thresholds are shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1: GHG Significance Thresholds
2020 2030 2035 2050
Per Capita Emissions Efficiency Targets
(MT CO2e/capita/yr) 7.21 4.00 3.22 1.19
Per Service Population Emissions
Efficiency Targets
(MT CO2e/SP/yr)

5.07 2.79 2.25 0.83
Projects which use these thresholds for environmental analysis should include a brief justification of the type of efficiency target and the target year selected. Per capita is most applicable to projects which only include residential uses, or in cases where reliable data to generate a service population estimate is unavailable. Projects should generally use the 2035 target year. Note that future p rojects consistent with the General Plan will not require further analysis, per the tiering provisions of CEQA.

Note: MMT CO2e = million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; Service Population (SP) = population + employment

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b) Greenhouse gases are primarily emitted as a result of vehicle operation associated with trips to and from a project, and energy consumption from operation of the buildings. Greenhouse gases from vehicles is assessed based on the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) resulting from the project, on a Citywide basis. Residential projects, destination centers (such as a regional mall), and major employers tend to increase VMT in a study area, either by adding new residents traveling in an area, or by encouraging longer trip lengths and drawing in trips from a broader regional area. However, non-residential projects and neighborhood- serving uses (e.g. neighborhood parks) tend to lower VMT in a study area because they do not generate new trips within the study area, they divert existing trips. These trips are diverted because the new use location is closer to home, on their way to another destination (e.g. work), or is otherwise more convenient.

The Project is a request for a rezone of the 1.56-acre property from MP to CC/SA to allow medical services with approval of a CUP. The project also includes a CUP to allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site within an existing 15,998-square-foot building. While the Project requires a rezone, the existing land use designation is CC, which is designated for commercial uses such as a medical clinic. As further discussed and evaluated in Section XVII (Transportation) of this Initial Study, the project is considered a locally-serving use that does not include any unique characteristics that would draw regional traffic, or would prompt longer trips. The project is presumed to have a less than significant impact to the transportation system on the basis of project-generated VMT. Additionally, the project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and will not create additional trips that have not already been evaluated in the General Plan EIR.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

The City’s General Plan EIR included an analysis of GHG emissions, which would result from buildout of the City’s General Plan. The EIR concluded that the General Plan build out would exceed the City’s threshold of

2.25 MT CO2e per service population and that the effect was cumulatively considerable. Although mitigation measures were adopted as part of the General Plan, those measures would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and impacts were considered significant and unavoidable. The proposed project is consistent with the land use assumptions in the General Plan EIR and does not require further analysis per the tiering provisions of CEQ A. The project includes reasonable and feasible design measures to reduce emissions, including implementation of the latest Cal-Green and energy efficiency code requirements. The project complies with General Plan policy related to GHG and the project does not result in any new GHG impacts not previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR; therefore, impacts are less than significant.

IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
No hazardous sites or potential for hazardous materials have been identified within 1000 feet of the project site, as indicated by a search of the State of California’s Envirostor database (http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
) on July 15, 2024. However, according to the California State Water Resources Control Board Geotracker website ( http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/), there is one (1) hazardous cleanup sites of record within 1,000 feet of the site. The site was a Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup site. The cleanup status of this site is complete, and the case has been closed.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard
to the public or the
environment through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous
materials?
X
b) Create a significant hazard
to the public or the
environment though
reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident
conditions involving the
release of hazardous
materials into the
environment?
X
c) Emit hazardous emissions
or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or
proposed school?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
d) Be located on a site which
is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment?

e) For a project located within
an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would
the project result in a
safety hazard or excessive
noise for people residing
or working in the project
area?
X
f) Impair implementation of
or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency
response plan or
emergency evacuation
plan?
X
g) Expose people or
structures either directly or
indirectly to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to hazardous materials is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–g listed above. A material is defined as hazardous if it appears on a list of hazardous materials prepared by a federal, state or local regulatory agency, or if it has characteristics defined as hazardous by such an agency.

The determination of significance based on the above criteria depends on the probable frequency and severity of consequences to people who might be exposed to the health hazard, and the degree to which Project design or existing regulations would reduce the frequency of or severity of exposure. As an example, products commonly used for household cleaning are classified as hazardous when transported in large quantities, but one would not conclude that the presence of small quantities of household cleaners at a home would pose a risk to a school located within ¼-mile.

Many federal and State agencies regulate hazards and hazardous substances, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board), and the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CalOSHA). The state has been granted primacy (primary responsibility for oversight) by the US EPA to administer and enforce hazardous waste management programs. State regulations also have detailed planning and management requirements to ensure that hazardous materials are handled, stored, and

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

disposed of properly to reduce human health risks. California regulations pertaining to hazardous waste management are published in the California Code of Regulations (see 8 CCR, 22 CCR, and 23 CCR).

The project is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private use airport. Therefore, no further discussion is provided for item e.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a, b) Standard construction activities would require the use of hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, lubricants, glues, paints and paint thinners, soaps, bleach, and solvents. These are common household and commercial materials routinely used by both businesses and average members of the public. The materials only pose a hazard if they are improperly used, stored, or transported either through upset conditions (e.g. a vehicle accident) or mishandling. In addition to construction use, the operational project would result in the use of common hazardous materials as well, including bleach, solvents, and herbicides. Regulations pertaining to the transport of materials are codified in 49 Code of Federal Regulations 171–180, and transport regulations are enforced and monitored by the California Department of Transportation and by the California Highway Patrol.

Specifications for storage on a construction site are contained in various regulations and codes, including the California Code of Regulations, the Uniform Fire Code, and the California Health and Safety Code. These same codes require that all hazardous materials be used and stored in the manner specified on the material packaging.

Existing regulations and programs are sufficient to ensure that potential impacts as a result of the use or storage of hazardous materials are reduced to less than significant levels. c) See response to Items (a) and (b) above. While development of the site will result in the use, handling, and transport of materials deemed to be hazardous, the materials in question are commonly used in both residential and commercial applications, and include materials such as bleach and herbicides. The project will not result in the use of any acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. d) T he project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5
3; therefore, no impact will occur.
e) This project is located within an area currently receiving City emergency services and development of the site has been anticipated and incorporated into emergency response plans. As such, the project will cause a less than significant impact to the City's Emergency Response or Management Plans. Furthermore, the project will be required to comply with all local, State and federal requirements for the handling of hazardous materials, which will ensure less-than-significant impacts. These will require the following programs:
• A Risk Management and Prevention Program (RMPP) is required of uses that handle toxic and/or hazardous materials in quantities regulated by the California Health and Safety Code and/or the City. • Businesses that handle toxic or hazardous materials are required to complete a Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) pursuant to local, State, or federal requirements. g) The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection ( CAL FIRE) is the state agency responsible for wildland fire protection and management. As part of that task, CAL FIRE maintains maps designating Wildland Fire Hazard Severity zones. The City is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and is not in a CAL FIRE responsibility area; fire suppression is entirely within local responsibility. The project site is in an urban area, and therefore would not expose people to any risk from wildland fire. There would be no impact with regard to this criterion.

3 http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/SectionA.htm

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

X. Hydrology and Water Quality
As described in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, the City is located within the Pleasant Grove Creek Basin and the Dry Creek Basin. Pleasant Grove Creek and its tributaries drain most of the western and central areas of the City and Dry Creek and its tributaries drain the remainder of the City. Most major stream areas in the City are located within designated open space.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste
discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially
degrade surface or ground
water quality?
X
b) Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge
such that the project may
impede sustainable
groundwater management
of the basin?
X
c) Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern
of the site or area,
including through the
alteration of the course of
a stream or river or
through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:

X
i) result in substantial
erosion or siltation on
or off-site;
X
ii) substantially increase
the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a
manner which would
result in flooding on-
or off-site;
X
iii) create or contribute
runoff water which
would exceed the
capacity of existing or
planned stormwater
systems or provide
substantial additional
sources of polluted
runoff; or
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
iv) impede or redirect
flood flows? X
d) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water
quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater
management plan?
X
e) In flood hazard, tsunami,
or seiches zones, risk
release of pollutants due to
project innundation?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to hydrology and water quality is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above. For checklist item a, c (i), d, and e, the Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the City of Roseville Design/Construction Standards (Resolution 07 -107), Urban Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (RMC Ch. 14.20), and Stormwater Quality Design Manual (Resolution 16-152) will prevent significant impacts related to water quality or erosion. The standards require preparation of an erosion and sediment control plan for construction activities and includes designs to control pollutants within post -construction urban water runoff. Likewise, it is indicated that the Drainage Fees for the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Watersheds (RMC Ch.4.48) and City of Roseville Design/Construction Standards (Resolution 07-107) will prevent significant impacts related to checklist items c (ii) and c (iii) . The ordinance and standards require the collection of drainage fees to fund improvements that mitigate potential flooding impacts, and require the design of a water drainage system that will adequately convey anticipated stormwater flows without increasing the rate or amount of surface runoff. These same ordinances and standards prevent impacts related to groundwater (items a and d), because developers are required to treat and detain all stormwater onsite using stormwater swales and other methods which slow flows and preserve infiltration. Finally, it is indicated that compliance with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (RMC Ch. 9.80) will prevent significant impacts related to items c (iv) and e. The Ordinance includes standard requirements for all new construction, including regulation of development with the potential to impede or redirect flood flows, and prohibits development within flood hazard areas. Impacts from tsunamis and seiches were screened out of the analysis (item e) because the project is not located near a water body or other feature that would pose a risk of such an event.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a,c (i),d, e) The project will involve the disturbance of on-site soils and the construction of impervious surfaces, such as asphalt paving and buildings. Disturbing the soil can allow sediment to be mobilized by rain or wind , and cause displacement into waterways. To address this and other issues, the developer is required to receive approval of a grading permit and/or improvement plants prior to the start of construction. The permit or plans are required to incorporate mitigation measures for dust and erosion control. In addition, the City has a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board which requires the City to reduce pollutants in stormwater to the maximum extent practicable. The City does this, in part, by means of the City’s 2016 Design/Construction Standards, which require preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. All permanent stormwater quality control measures must be designed to comply with the City’s Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Standards for New Development, the City’s 2016 Design/Construction Standards, Urban Stormwater

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, and Stormwater Quality Design Manual. For these reasons, impacts related to water quality are less than significant. b, d) The project does not involve the installation of groundwater wells. The City maintains wells to supplement surface water supplies during multiple dry years, but the effect of groundwater extraction on the aquifer was addressed in the City’s Urban Water Master Plan and evaluated in the General Plan EIR. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation, and is thus consistent with the citywide evaluation of water supply. Project impacts related to groundwater extraction are less than significant. Furthermore, all permanent stormwater quality control measures must be designed to comply with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual, which requires the use of bioswales and other onsite detention and infiltration methods. These standards ensure that stormwater will continue to infiltrate into the groundwater aquifer. c (ii and iii)) The project has been reviewed by City Engineering staff for conformance with City ordinances and standards. The project includes adequate and appropriate facilities to ensure no net increase in the amount or rate of stormwater runoff from the site, and which will adequately convey stormwater flows. c (iv) and e) The project has been reviewed by City Engineering staff for conformance with City ordinances and standards. The project is not located within either the Federal Emergency Management Agency floodplain or the City’s Regulatory Floodplain (defined as the floodplain which will result from full buildout of the City).

Therefore, the project will not impede or redirect flood flows , nor will it be inundated. The proposed project is located within an area of flat topography and is not near a waterbody or other feature which could cause a seiche or tsunami. There would be no impact with regard to these criterion.

XI. Land Use and Planning
The site is within the City’s Infill area and is currently developed with commercial building that is approximately 15,998-square-feet. The site has a zoning designation of MP and a land use designation of CC. The Project is bounded by Stonehouse Court to the north, a vacant parcel to the east, an automotive use to the south, and a

0.50-acre landscape strip to the west.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Physically divide an
established community? X
b) Cause a significant
environmental impact due
to a conflict with any land
use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency
adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to land use is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a and b listed above. Consistency with applicable City General Plan policies, Improvement Standards, and design standards is already required and part of the City’s processing of permits and plans, so these requirements do not appear as mitigation measures.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The project area has been master planned for development, including adequate roads, pedestrian paths, and bicycle paths to provide connections within the community. The project will not physically divide an established community.
b) The Project includes a Rezone to change the zoning from MP to CC/SA to be consistent with the land use designation and allow medical services. A medical office is conditionally compatible with the CC land use and zoning designation, and therefore requires a CUP. The CUP will place restrictions on the site operations, including hours of operation. No conflicts with any policies adopted to mitigate an environmental effect have been identified.

XII. Mineral Resources
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975 requires the State Geologist to classify land into Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ’s) based on the known or inferred mineral resource potential of that land. The California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) was historically responsible for the classification and designation of areas containing—or potentially containing—significant mineral resources, though that responsibility now lies with the California Geological Survey (CGS). CDMG published Open File Report 95-10, which provides the mineral classification map for Placer County. A detailed evaluation of mineral resources has not been conducted within the City limits, but MRZ’s have been identified. There are four broad MRZ categories (MRZ-1 through MRZ-4), and only MRZ-2 represents an area of known significant mineral resources. The City of Roseville General Plan EIR included Exhibit 4.1-3, depicting the location of MRZ’s in the City limits. There is only one small MRZ-2 designation area, located at the far eastern edge of the City.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that
would be of value to the
region and the residents of
the state?
X
b) Result in the loss of
availability of a locally-
important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on
a local general plan,
specific plan or other land
use plan?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to mineral resources is based directly on the CE QA Guidelines checklist items a and b listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b) The project site is not in the area of the City known to include any mineral resources that would be of local, regional, or statewide importance; therefore, the project has no impacts on mineral resources.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

XIII. Noise
The Project is located adjacent to Stonehouse Court to the north, which is not identified as a transportation noise source in the City’s General Plan Noise Element. However, the Project site is located approximately 450 feet west of Highway 80 and approximately 750 feet northwest of Highway 65, which are both identified as transportation noise sources in the City’s General Plan Noise Element. In the existing and future conditions, the 70 db Ldn contour line for both of these roadways covers the entire project site (Ci ty of Roseville General Plan 2035 Noise Element, Figures IX -1 and IX -2). Other uses within the vicinity of the site include retail and commercial uses, which generate low outdoor noise. The nearest sensitive receptor is the multi-family residential use located approximately 400 feet away to the west, across Union Pacific Railroad.

Would the project result in:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the
project in excess of
standards established in
the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of
other agencies?
X
b) Generation of excessive
ground borne vibration of
ground borne noise levels?
X
c) For a project located within
the vicinity of a private
airstrip or an airport land
use plan or, where such a
plan has not been
adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public
use airport, would the
project expose people
residing or working in the
project area to excessive
noise levels?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

Standards for transportation noise and non -transportation noise affecting existing or proposed land uses are established within the City of Roseville General Plan Noise Element, and these standards are used as the thresholds to determine the significance of impacts related to items a and c. The significance of other noise impacts is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items b and c listed above. The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the City Noise Regulation (RMC Ch. 9.24) will prevent significant non-transportation noise as it relates to items a and b. The Ordinance establishes noise exposure standards that protect noise- sensitive receptors from a variety of noise sources, including non- transportation/fixed noise, amplified sound, industrial noise, and events on public property. The project is not

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public or public use airport and there are also no private airstrips in the vicinity of the project area. Therefore, item c has been ruled out from further analysis.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The Project is a medical office facility, which is not considered to be a noise-generating use. The project will not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of City standards; thus, impacts are less than significant. b) Surrounding uses may experience short -term increases in groundborne vibration, groundborne noise, and airborne noise levels during construction. However, these increases would only occur for a short period of time. When conducted during daytime hours, construction activities are exempt from Noise Ordinance standards, but the standards do apply to construction occurring during nighttime hours . While the noise generated may be a minor nuisance, the City Noise Regulation standards are designed to ensure that impacts are not unduly intrusive. Based on this, the impact is less than significant.

XIV. Population and Housing
The project site is located within the Infill area of the City and has a land use designation of CC. The City of Roseville General Plan Table II-4 identifies the total number of residential units and population anticipated as a result of buildout of the City, and the Specific Plan likewise includes unit allocations and population projections for the Plan Area. Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Induce substantial
unplanned population
growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly
(for example, though
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
X
b) Displace substantial
numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating
the construction of
replacement housing
elsewhere?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to population and housing is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a and b listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The CEQA Guidelines identify several ways in which a project could have growth -inducing impacts (Public Resources Code Section 15126.2), either directly or indirectly. Growth-inducement may be the result of fostering economic growth, fostering population growth, providing new housing, or removing barriers to growth.

Growth inducement may be detrimental, beneficial, or of no impact or significance under CEQA. An impact is

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

only deemed to occur when it directly or indirectly affects the ability of agencies to provide needed public services, or if it can be shown that the growth will significantly affect the environment in some other way. The project is consistent with the land use designation of the site. Therefore, while the project in question will induce some level of growth, this growth was already identified and its effects disclosed and mitigated within the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the impact of the project is less than significant. b) The Project site is developed with a commercial building and parking. No housing exists on the project site, and there would be no impact with respect to these criteria.

XV. Public Services
Fire protection, police protection, park services, and library services are provided by the City. The Project is located within the Roseville Elementary and Roseville Joint High School Districts. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Fire protection? X
b) Police protection? X
c) Schools? X
d) Parks? X
e) Other public facilities? X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to public services is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above. The EIR for the Specific Plan addressed the level of public services which would need to be provided in order to serve planned growth in the community. Development Agreements and other conditions have been adopted in all proposed growth areas of the City which identify the physical facilities needed to serve growth, and the funding needed to provide for the construction and operation of those facilities and services; the project is consistent with the Specific Plan. In addition, the project has been routed to the various public service agencies, both internal and external, to ensure that the project meets the agencies’ design standards (where applicable) and to provide an opportunity to recommend appropriate conditions of approval.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) Existing City codes and regulations require adequate water pressure in the water lines, and construction must comply with the Uniform Fire and Building Codes used by the City of Roseville. Additionally, the applicant is required to pay a fire service construction tax, which is used for purchasing capital facilities for the Fire Department. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts.
b) Pursuant to the Development Agreement for the project area, the developer is required to pay fees into a Community Fac ilities District, which provides funding for police services. Sales taxes and property taxes resulting from the development will add revenue to the General Fund, which also serves to fund police services. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

c) The applicant for this project is required to pay school impact fees at a rate determined by the local school districts. School fees will be collected prior to the issuance of building permits, consistent with City requirements.

School sites have already been designated as part of the Specific Plan process. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts. d) Pursuant to the Development Agreement for the project area, the developer will be required to pay fees into a Community Facilities District, which provides funding for park services. Future park and recreation sites and facilities have already been identified as part of the Specific Plan process. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts. e) Pursuant to the Development Agreement for the project area, the developer will be required to pay fees into a Community Facilities District , which provides funding for the library system and other such facilities and services. In addition, the City charges fees to end- users for other services, such as garbage and greenwaste collection, in order to fund those services. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts.

XVI. Recreation
The Project is a medical office, located on a parcel with a land use designation of CC. The nearest park facility, Apollo Dog Park, is approximately 0.25 miles to the northwest of the Project site.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project
increase the use of
existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other
recreational facilities such
that physical deterioration
of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
X
b) Does the project include
recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational
facilities which might have
an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to recreation services is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–b listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) T he General Plan EIR addressed the level of park services —including new construction, maintenance, and operations—which would need to be provided in order to serve planned growth in the community. Given that the project is consistent with the General Plan, the project would not cause any unforeseen or new impacts

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

related to the use of existing or proposed parks and recreational facilities. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts. b) Park sites and other recreational facilities were identified within the General Plan EIR. The project will not cause any unforeseen or new impacts related to the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.

XVII. Transportation
The Project site is located adjacent to Stonehouse Court. The Project frontage along Stonehouse Court is improved with sidewalks, curb, and gutter. Ingress and egress for the Project will be provided by the existing driveways on Stonehouse Court that will provide for full-turning movements.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with a program,
plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
X
b) Conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
X
c) Substantially increase
hazards due to a
geometric design
feature(s) (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
X
d) Result in inadequate
emergency access?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The City has adopted the following plans, ordinances, or policies applicable to checklist item a: Pedestrian Master Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, Short -Range Transit Plan, and General Plan Circulation Element. The project is evaluated for consistency with these plans and the policies contained within them. For checklist item b, the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 establishes a detailed process for evaluating the significance of transportation impacts. In accordance with this section, the analysis must focus on the generation of vehicle miles traveled (VMT); effects on automobile delay cannot be considered a significant impact . The City developed analysis guidance and thresholds as part of the 2035 General Plan Update project approved in July 2020. The detailed evaluation and justification is contained within the General Plan EIR.

Future projects consistent with the General Plan will not require further VMT analysis, pursuant to the tiering provisions of CEQA. For projects which are inconsistent, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) allows lead agencies discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to rely on a qualitative analysis

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

or performance-based standards. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) allows lead agencies the discretion to select their own thresholds and allow for differences in thresholds based on context.

Quantitative analysis would not be required if it can be demonstrated that the project would generate VMT which is equivalent to or less than what was assumed in the General Plan EIR. Examples of such projects include:
• L ocal-serving retail and other local-serving development, which generally reduces existing trip distances by providing services in closer proximity to residential areas, and therefore reduce VMT. • Multi-family residences, which generally have fewer trips per household than single-family residences, and therefore also produce less VMT per unit.
• Infill projects in developed areas generally have shorter trips, reduced vehicle trips, and therefore less VMT.
• Pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and electric vehicle transportation projects. • Residential projects in low per-capita household VMT areas and office projects in low per-worker VMT areas (85 percent or less than the regional average) as shown on maps maintained by SACOG or within low VMT areas as shown within Table 4.3-8 of the General Plan EIR.

When quantitative analysis is required, the threshold of 12.8 VMT/capita may be used for projects not within the scope of the General Plan EIR, provided the cumulative context of the 2035 General Plan has not changed substantially. Since approval of the 2035 General Plan, the City has not annexed new land, substantially changed roadway network assumptions, or made any other changes to the 2035 assumptions which would require an update to the City’s VMT thresholds contained within the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the threshold of 12.8 VMT/capita remains appropriate.

No qualitative VMT analysis was conducted for the proposed project, as the development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation.

Impacts with regard to items c and d are assessed based on the expert judgment of the City Engineer and City Fire Department, as based upon facts and consistency with the City’s Design and Construction Standards.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The City of Roseville has adopted a Pedestrian Master Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, and Short -Range Transit Plan. The project was reviewed for consistency with these documents, and no conflict were identified. b) No qualitative VMT analysis was completed for the proposed project because it is consi stent with the existing land use designation, is a local -serving commercial development, and will be constructed on an infill parcel. It is assumed (based on the thresholds of significance) that the proposed project will reduce VMT.

Therefore, impacts are less than significant.
c, d) The project has been reviewed by the City Engineering and City Fire Department staff, and has been found to be consistent with the City’s Design Standards. Furthermore, standard conditions of approval added to all City project require compliance with Fire Codes and other design standards. Compliance with existing regulations ensure that impacts are less than significant.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources
As described within the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, the Roseville region was within the territory of the Nisenan (also Southern Maidu or Valley Maidu). Two large permanent Nisenan habitation sites have been identified and protected within the City’s open space (in Maidu Park). Numerous smaller tribal cultural resources, such as midden deposits and bedrock mortars, have also been recorded in the City. A majority of documented sites within the City are located in areas designated for open space uses. The United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) is a federally recognized Tribe comprised of both Miwok and Maidu (Nisenan) Tribal members who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. The UAIC has indicated that "the Tribe has deep spiritual, cultural, and physical ties to their ancestral land and are contemporary stewards of their culture and landscapes. The Tribal community represents a continuity and endurance of their ancestors by maintaining their connection to their history and culture. It is the Tribe’s goal to ensure the preservation and continuance of their cultural heritage for current and future generations." Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Listed or eligible for listing
in the California Register
of Historical Resources, or
in a local register of
historical resources as
defined in Public
Resources Code section
5020.1(k)?
X
b) A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1? In applying the
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1 the lead agency
shall consider the
significance of the
resource to a California
Native American tribe.

X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

Tribal cultural resources are defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074, as either 1) a site, feature, place, geographically-defined cultural landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, that is listed or eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources, or on a local register of historical resources or as 2) a resource determined by the lead agency, supported by substantial

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

evidence, to be significant according to the historical register criteria in Public Resources Code section 5024.1(c), and considering the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a&b) The site is not listed on the California Register of Historical Resources, or on a local register of historical resources. Notice of the proposed project was mailed to tribes which had requested such notice pursuant to AB52. A request for consultation was received by the United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC). Per the tribe (verbatim), the UAIC is a federally recognized Tribe comprised of both Miwok and Maidu (Nisenan) Tr ibal members who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. The Tribe has a deep spiritual, cultural, and physical ties to their ancestral land and are contemporary stewards of their culture and landscapes.

The Tribal community represents a continuity and endurance of their ancestors by maintaining their connection to their history and culture. It is the Tribe’s goal to ensure the preservation and continuance of their cultural heritage for current and future generations.

No on- site walkthrough was requested by UAIC. However, as per the tribe (verbatim), UAIC conducted background search for the identification of Tribal Cultural Resources for this project, which included a review of pertinent literature, historic maps, and a records search using UAIC’s Tribal Historic Information System (THRIS).

UAIC’s THRIS database is composed of UAIC’s areas of oral history, ethnographic history, and places of cultural and religious significance, including UAIC Sacred Lands that are submitted to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The THRIS resources shown in this region also include previously recorded indigenous resources identified through the California Historic Resources Information System Center (CHRIS) as well as historic resources and survey data. The UAIC subsequently closed consultation with incorporation of a standard unanticipated discoveries measure, Mitigation Measure TCR-1. The measure is designed to reduce impacts to resources, should any be found on-site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. With mitigation, project-specific impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Unanticipated Discoveries
If any suspected TCRs, including but not limited to cultural features, midden/cultural soils, artifacts, exotic rock (non-native), shell, bone, shaped stones, or ash/charcoal are discovered by any person during construction activities including ground disturbing activities, all work shall pause immediately within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. Work shall cease in and within the immediate vicinity of the find regardless of whether the construction is being actively monitored by a Tribal Monitor, cultural resources specialist, or professional archaeologist.

A Tribal Representative shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC §21074) and will make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.

Treatment:

The culturally affiliated Tribe shall consult to (1) identify the boundaries of the new TCR and (2) if feasible, identify appropriate preservation in place and avoidance measures, including redesign or adjustments to the existing construction process, and long-term management, or 3) if avoidance is infeasible, a reburial location in proximity of the find where no future disturbance is anticipated. Permanent curation of TCRs will not take place unless approved in writing by the culturally affiliated Tribe.

The construction contractor(s) shall provide secure, on- site storage for culturally sensitive soils or objects that are components of TCRs that are found or recovered during construction. Only Tribal Representatives shall have access to the storage. Storage size is determined by the nature of the TCR and can range from small lock boxes to conex boxes.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

The construction contractor(s) and agency shall facilitate the respectful reburial of the culturally sensitive soils or objects. This includes providing a reburial location that is consistent with the Tribe’s preferences, excavation of the reburial location, and assisting with the reburial, upon request.

Work at the discovery location shall not resume until authorization is granted by the lead agency in coordination with the culturally affiliated Tribe.

If articulated or disarticulated human remains, or human remains in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness are discovered during construction activities, the Placer County Coroner and the culturally affiliated Tribe shall be contacted immediately. Upon determination by the Placer County Coroner that the find is Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission will assign the Most Likely Descendent who will work with the project proponent to define appropriate treatment and disposition of the burials.

XIX. Utilities and Service Systems
The project site is located within a developed area of the City of Roseville, and will be served by the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Require or result in the
relocation or construction
of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage,
electric power, natural gas,
or telecommunications
facilities, the construction
or relocation of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
X
b) Have sufficient water
supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably
foreseeable future
development during
normal, dry, and multiple
dry years?
X
c) Result in a determination
by the wastewater
treatment provider which
serves the project that it
has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s
projected demand in
addition of the provider’s
existing commitments?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
d) Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of
the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise
impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction
goals?
X
e) Comply with federal, state,
and local management
and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid
waste?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to utilities and service systems is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The project is consistent with the land use of CC, and will be required to construct any utilities infrastructure necessary to serve the project, as well as pay fees which fund the operation of the facilities and the construction of major infrastructure. Minor additional infrastructure will be constructed within the project site to ti e the project into the major systems, but these facilities will be constructed in locations where site development is already occurring as part of the overall project; there are no additional substantial impacts specific or particular to the minor infrastructure improvements. b) The City of Roseville 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), adopted June 2021, estimates water demand and supply for the City through the year 2045 , based on existing land use designations and population projections. In addition, the General Plan EIR estimates water demand and supply for ultimate General Plan buildout. The project is consistent with existing land use designations, and is therefore consistent with the assumptions of the UWMP and General Plan EIR. The UWMP indicates that existing water supply sources are sufficient to meet all normal years, and during single- dry and in certain multiple- dry years, water supply deficit may occur. The UWMP estimates a near-term (2025) demand of 51,585 acre-feet per year (AFY), and a long- term, buildout (2045) demand of 62,547 AFY. In normal years, supply exceeds demand by approximately 13,000 AFY in the near-term and by approximately 8,000 AFY at buildout. The UWMP establishes some water supply deficit during dry year scenarios, ranging from approximately 1,500 AFY to 5,000 AFY depending on the scenario, but establishes that mandatory water conservation measures and the use of groundwater to offset reductions in surface water supplies are sufficient to offset the deficit. The project, which is consistent with existing land use designations, would not require new or expanded water supply entitlements. c) The proposed project would be served by the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP). The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulates water quality and quantity of effluent discharged from the City’s wastewater treatment facilities. The DCWWTP has the capacity to treat 18 million gallons per day (mgd) and is currently treating 8.9 mgd. The project is consistent with existing land use designations, which is how infrastructure capacity is planned. Therefore, the volume of wastewater generated by the proposed project could be accommodated by the facility; the proposed project will not contribute to an exceedance of applicable wastewater treatment requirements. The impact would be less than significant.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

d, e) The Western Placer Waste Management Authority is the regional agency handling recycling and waste disposal for Roseville and surrounding areas. The regional waste facilities include a Material Recovery Facility (MRF) and the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill (WRSL). Currently, the WRSL is permitted to accept up to 1,900 tons of municipal solid waste per day. According to the solid waste analysis of the General Plan EIR, under current projected development conditions the WRSL has a projected lifespan extending through 2058. There is sufficient existing capacity to serve the proposed project. Though the project will contribute incrementally to an eventual need to find other means of waste disposal, this impact of City buildout has already been disclosed and mitigation applied as part of each Specific Plan the City has approved. All residences and business in the City pay fees for solid waste collection, a portion of which is collected to fund eventual solid waste disposal expansion.

The project will not result in any new impacts associated with major infrastructure. Environmental Utilities staff has reviewed the project for consistency with policies, codes, and regulations related to waste disposal and waste reduction regulations and policies and has found that the project design is in compliance.

XX. Wildfire
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Substantially impair an
adopted emergency
response plan or
emergency evacuation
plan?
X
b) Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose
project occupants to
pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
X
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources,
power lines or other
utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the
environment?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
d) Expose people or
structures to significant
risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage
changes?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to wildfire is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–d listed above. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) is the state agency responsible for wildland fire protection and management. As part of that task, CAL FIRE maintains maps designating Wildland Fire Hazard Severity zones. The City is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and is not in a CAL FIRE responsibility area; fire suppression is entirely within local responsibility.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–d) C hecklist questions a–d above do not apply, because the project site is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and is not in a CAL FIRE responsibility area.

XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially
reduce the number or
restrict the range of an
endangered, threatened or
rare species, or eliminate
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
X
b) Does the project have
impacts which are
individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively
considerable” means that
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
the incremental effects of a
project are considerable
when viewed in connection
with the effects of past
projects, the effects of
other current projects, and
the effects of probable
future projects.)
c) Does the project have
environmental effects
which will cause
substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
X

Significance Criteria and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to mandatory findings of significance is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–c listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–c) Long term environmental goals are not impacted by the proposed project. The cumulative impacts do not deviate beyond what was contemplated in the General Plan EIR, and mitigation measures have already been incorporated via the General Plan EIR. With implementation of the City’s Mitigating Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards and best management practices, mitigation measures described in this chapter, and permit conditions, the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the habitat of any plant or animal species.

Based on the foregoing, the proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of any wildlife species, or create adverse effects on human beings.

Last Revised March 2019
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

In reviewing the site specific information provided for this project and acting as Lead Agency, the City of Roseville, Development Services Department, Planning Division has analyzed the potential environmental impacts created by this project and determined that with mitigation the impacts are less than significant. As demonstrated in the initial study checklist, there are no “project specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or site” that cannot be reduced to less than significant effects through mitigation (CEQA Section 15183) and therefore an EIR is not required. Therefore, on the basis of the foregoing initial study:
[ X ] I find that the proposed project COULD, but with mitigation agreed to by the applicant, clearly will not have a significant effect on the environment and a MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared.

Initial Study Prepared by:
____________________________________________
Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
City of Roseville, Development Services – Planning Division Attachments:

1. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
~

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Project
Title/File Number: INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health; File #PL24-0330 Project Location: 100 Stonehouse Court, Roseville, Placer County, CA 95678 (APN 015- 162-006-000)
Project Description:

The proposed project is a request for a rezone of the 1.56 -acre property from Industrial/Business Park to Community Commercial/Special Area to allow medical services with approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP).

The project also includes a CUP, to allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site, a Design Review Permit Modification (DRPMOD)
to modify the exterior of the
building and site accessibility improvements, and an Administ rative Permit (AP) for a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use.

Environmental Document Mitigated Negative Declaration
Project Applicant: Andi Panagopoulos, Cunningham Engineering Property Owner: Jonathan Porteus, PhD, WellSpace Health Lead Agency Contact Person: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner; Phone (916) 774-5247 Section
21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code requires public agencies to "adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment." This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been adopted for the purpose of avoiding environmental impacts MONITORING PROCESS: Existing monitoring mechanisms are in place that assist the City of Roseville in meeting the intent of CEQA. These existing monitoring mechanisms eliminate the need to develop new monitoring processes for each mitigation measure. These mechanisms include grading plan review and approval, improvement/building plan review and approval and on-site inspections by City Departments. Given that these monitoring processes are requirements of the project, they are not included in the mitigation monitoring program.

It shall be the responsibility of the project applicant/owner to provide written notification to the City using the Mitigation Verification Cover Sheet and Forms, in a timely manner, of the completion of each Mitigation Measure as identified on the following pages. The City will verify that the project is in compliance with the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Any non-compliance will be reported by the City to the applicant/owner, and it shall be the project applicant’s/owner’s responsibility to rectify the situation by bringing the project into compliance. The purpose of this program is to ensure diligent and good faith compliance with the Mitigation Measures which have been adopted as part of the project.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT – PLANNING DIVISION
311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774 -5276 IS/MND ATTACHMENT 1
~~
l!~J
ROsE'VltLE

CALIFO IRN I A

TABLE OF MITIGATION MEASURES
Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Reviewing Party Documents to be Submitted to City
Staff Use Only
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Unanticipated Discoveries

If any suspected TCRs, including but not limited to cultural features, midden/cultural soils, artifacts, exotic rock (non-native), shell, bone, shaped stones, or ash/charcoal are discovered by any person during construction activities including ground disturbing activities, all work shall pause immediately within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. Work shall cease in and within the immediate vicinity of the find regardless of whether the construction is being actively monitored by a Tribal Monitor, cultural resources specialist, or professional archaeologist.

A Tribal Representative shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC §21074) and will make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.

Treatment:

The culturally affiliated Tribe shall consult to (1) identify the boundaries of the new TCR and (2) if feasible, identify appropriate preservation in place and avoidance measures, including redesign or adjustments to the existing construction process, and long- term management, or 3) if avoidance is infeasible, a reburial location in proximity of the find where no future disturbance is anticipated. Permanent curation of TCRs will not take place unless approved in writing by the culturally affiliated Tribe.

The construction contractor(s) shall provide secure, on -site storage for culturally sensitive soils or objects that are components of TCRs that are found or recovered during construction. Only Tribal Representatives shall have access to the storage. Storage size is determined by the nature of the TCR and can range from small lock boxes to connex boxes.

The construction contractor(s) and agency shall facilitate the respectful reburial of the culturally sensitive soils or objects. This includes providing a reburial location that is consistent with the Tribe’s preferences, excavation of the reburial location, and assisting with the reburial, upon request.

Work at the discovery location shall not resume until authorization is granted by the lead agency in coordination with the culturally affiliated Tribe.

If articulated or disarticulated human remains, or human remains in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness are discovered during construction activities, the Placer County Coroner and the culturally affiliated Tribe shall be contacted immediat ely.

Upon determination by the Placer County Coroner that the find is Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission will assign the Most Likely Descendent who will work with the project proponent to define appropriate treatment and disposition of the burials.

This condition shall be reflected in all
construction and building plans, and
construction site workers shall be
advised by the site manager of this
measure.

Construction: Measure applies if
resources are discovered during
construction.

Add as note on Improvement Plans
and Building Plans.

Engineering and Building None

MITIGATION VERIFICATION SUBMITTAL COVER SHEET
Project Title/Planning File # INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health; File #PL24-0330 Project Address 100 Stonehouse Court, Roseville, Placer County, CA 95678 (APN 015 -162- 006-000)
Property Owner Jonathan Porteus, PhD, WellSpace Health
Planning Division Contact Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner; Phone (916) 774-5247

SUMMARY OF VERIFICATION MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL Mitigation Measure Supporting Attachments Included Date Complete

I HAVE ATTACHED THE FOLLOWING REQUIRED ITEMS:
☐ Table of Applicable Mitigation Measures
☐ Mitigation Verification Form(s)
☐ Specific supporting documentation required by measure(s), if applicable (e.g. biologist’s report) I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the property owner or an agent of the property owner and am authorized to submit this Mitigation Verification Form. I also certify that the above- listed mitigation measures have been completed in the manner required, and that all of the information in this submittal is true and correct, to the best of my knowledge:

Signature and Date Print Name Contact Number

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774-5276
~1
ROsE'VfLLE

CALIFORNIA

MITIGATION VERIFICATION FORM
Mitigation Measure
Description of Monitoring and Verification Work Performed. The following information is a required part of the description:
dates, personnel names or titles, and the stage/phase of construction work. Additional notes sheets may be attached, if necessary, or the below may simply reference a separate attachment that provides the required information.

INSTRUCTIONS
COVER SHEET:

A Cover Sheet for the project/development is prepared by City staff, with the top portion filled out. Each time Mitigation Verification Forms(s) are being submitted, a Cover Sheet completed by the Developer, Contractor, or Designee is required. An example of a completed summary table is provided below. The signature on the Cover Sheet must be original wet ink.

EXAMPLE MITIGATION VERIFICATION SUBMITTAL COVER SHEET
Project Title/Planning File # New Coffee Shop, PL15-0000 Project Address 10 Justashort Street
Property Owner Jane Owner
Planning Division Contact Joe Planner, Associate Planner, (916) 774-####

SUMMARY OF VERIFICATION MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL Mitigation
Measure Supporting Attachments Included Date Complete
MM-3 Copy of survey report signed by biologist 5/10/2016 MM-4 All information included in Mitigation Verification Form 5/12/2016 MM-5 E-mail from Air District approving Dust Control Plan 5/05/2016

MITIGATION VERIFICATION FORM:

A Mitigation Verification Form is provided by City staff, along with the Cover Sheet and Table of Applicable Mitigation Measures. A form is filled in and submitted for each mitigation measure by the Developer, Contractor, or Designee. The form needs only the mitigation number to be filled in, along with the Description of Monitoring and Verification Work Performed. Multiple forms may be submitted simultaneously, under one cover sheet. It is also permissible to submit a form for each part of a measure, on separate dates. For instance, in the example measure MM- 4 in the table above, the actual mitigation requires informing construction workers and retaining a qualified archeologist if resources are uncovered.

Thus, a developer may submit a form in May certifying that construction workers have been informed, and also submit a second copy of the form in July because resources were discovered and additional actions had to be undertaken.

Each mitigation measure specifies the type of supporting documentation required; this must be submitted in order for the City to accept the mitigation as complete. An example of a completed Mitigation Verification Form is provided below.

EXAMPLE

MITIGATION VERIFICATION FORM
Mitigation Measure MM3
Description of Monitoring and Verification Work Performed. The following information is a required part of the description:
dates, personnel names or titles, and the stage/phase of construction work. Additional notes sheets may be attached, if necessary, or the below may simply reference a separate attachment that provides the required information.

The mitigation measure text is included on the Improvement Plans General Notes page (Improvement Plan EN15-0001).

On May 4, 2016, prior to any ground-disturbing activities (the pre-construction phase), a site meeting was held. At this meeting, workers on the site were informed of the potential to unearth remains, and were instructed to cease work and notify their supervisor immediately if any resources were observed.

100 STONEHOUSE COURT – WELLSPACE HEALTH

COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICTS PERMITTED USES FOR COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL WITH

SPECIAL AREA OVERLAY (CC/SA)
Primary uses are permitted in commercial zones subject to the requirements of this title as designated below:

A. Principally permitted use, designated as “P”;
B. Conditionally permitted use, designated as “CUP”; and C. Administratively permitted use, designated as “A.”
100 STONEHOUSE COURT CC/SA PERMITTED USES
CC/SA

AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE USE TYPES
Resource Protection and Restoration CUP
Resource Related Recreation P

CIVIC USE TYPES
Community Assembly CUP
Community Services P
Essential Services P
Hospital Services
General Hospital Services -
Psychiatric Hospital Services -
Libraries and Museums, Private -
Public Parking Services P
Schools
College and University P
Public/Private Elementary and Secondary CUP
Social Services
Emergency Shelter -
Food Distribution -
Food Service -
Power Generating Facilities(9)
Emergency A
Supplemental/Individual Use CUP

PC EXHIBIT B
100 STONEHOUSE COURT CC/SA PERMITTED USES
CC/SA
Passive Power P

RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES
Accessory Dwelling Units(11) -
Caretaker/Employee Housing CUP
Community Care Facilities, Small -
Community Care Facilities, Large -
Dwelling(10)
Multi-Family(13, 14) -
Single-Family(14) -
Two-Family(14) -
Family Day Care Home, Small -
Family Day Care Home, Large -
Single Room Occupant -
Low-Barrier Navigation Centers -

COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Adult-Oriented Businesses -
Animal Sales and Service
Grooming and Pet Stores P
Kennels -
Veterinary Clinic P
Veterinary Hospital CUP
Automotive and Equipment
Automotive Body and Equipment Repair -
Automotive Rentals -
Automotive Repairs CUP
Automotive Sales CUP
Car Wash and Detailing CUP
Commercial Parking -
100 STONEHOUSE COURT CC/SA PERMITTED USES
CC/SA
Electric Vehicle Charging Center(12) P/CUP
Fuel Sales(12) -
Heavy Equipment Rental and Sales -
Banks and Financial Services P
Bars and Drinking Places -
Broadcasting and Recording Studios -
Building Material Stores CUP
Business Support Services P
Commercial Recreation
Amusement Center -
Indoor Entertainment CUP
Indoor Sports and Recreation P
Large Amusement Complexes -
Outdoor Entertainment -
Outdoor Sports and Recreation -
Community Care Facility -
Day Care Center -
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Fast Food with Drive-Through(12) -
Convenience P
Full Service -
Food and Beverage Retail Sales -
Funeral and Interment Services -
Lodging Services -
Long-Term Care Facility -
Maintenance and Repair P
Medical Services, General CUP
Neighborhood Commercial -
100 STONEHOUSE COURT CC/SA PERMITTED USES
CC/SA
Nightclubs(6) CUP
Nursery, Retail -
Offices, Professional P
Personal Services P
Retail Sales and Services P
Specialized Education and Training
Vocational Schools P
Specialty Schools P
Storage, Personal Storage Facility CUP

INDUSTRIAL USE TYPES
Laundries, Commercial CUP
Printing and Publishing -
Research Services -
Wholesaling and Distribution, Light -

TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION USE TYPES
Heliport -
Intermodal Facilities(8) CUP
Telecommunication Facilities(7) P/A/CUP
Notes:
(6) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter19.49. (7) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter19.34. (8) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter19.36. (9) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter19.55. (10) Transitional housing and supportive housing are considered residential use types and are permitted (P) where residential uses are permitted (P) or conditionally permitted (CUP).
(11) Accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling units are only permitted within areas zoned to allow single - family, two-family or multi-family residential use and must be located on a lot that contains an existing or proposed single -family, two-family or multi-family dwelling unit which has an approved CUP as defined in Sections 19.08.080(F)(1) and (F)(2) (Residential Use Types). See Chapter 19.60 for additional accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling unit regulations. (12) A Conditional Use Permit is required for fast food with drive through establishments, fuel sales establishments, or electric vehicle charging centers contiguous to:
(a) properties with a residential zoning designation; (b) parcels designated as a public utilities easement or landscape easement which are contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation; and (c) any other parcel of land upon which a building cannot be developed and which separates the subject parcel by less than 100 feet which is contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation. A conditional use permit is not required for these uses if the subject parcel is separated from properties with a residential zoning designation by a public roadway. (13) Multi-family uses are permitted with an Administrative Permit in the NC and CC zone districts when the housing development is constructed on or adjacent to a site occupied by a non-profit organization, and a non- profit organization will offer supportive services to the proposed residents. Examples of supportive services include transportation, child care, education assistance, and the provision of clothing and other supplies. (14) For sites within a specific plan, residential units are only permitted with a CUP if the specific plan has allocated units to the site. If no units are allocated or if fewer units are allocated than are proposed, a unit transfer or Specific Plan Amendment is required in addition to the CUP E
E
E
AC
AC
C

C CC C CC CC C
S 45°11'43" E 149.50'
S 4°24'26" E 61.90'
S 89°33'17" W 51.00'
S 50°10'17" W 49.53'
S 48°56'43" E 222.00'
N 34°05'47" E 229.00'
N 53°45'14" W 349.82'
S 34°33'17" W 62.50'

STONEHOUSE COURT

TAYLOR ROAD
E
E
E
AC
AC
C

C CC C CC CC C
S 45°11'43" E 149.50'
S 4°24'26" E 61.90'
S 89°33'17" W 51.00'
S 50°10'17" W 49.53'
S 48°56'43" E 222.00'
N 34°05'47" E 229.00'
N 53°45'14" W 349.82'
S 34°33'17" W 62.50'

STONEHOUSE COURT

TAYLOR ROAD

CALIFORNIAROSEVILLE
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento Office Davis Office
CECWEST.COM
1 FOR

ZONING EXHIBIT
Z-1

EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS

VICINITY MAP
NTS

SUMMARY TABLE

DESIGNATIONZONINGEXISTING PROPOSED
MPINDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS PARK1.691 AC. ±
CC/SACOMMUNITY COMMERCIAL / SPECIAL AREA0
0 1.691 AC.

PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS
100 STONEHOUSE
COURT

WELLSPACE HEALTH PLACER

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER

PC EXHIBIT C
/ EXISTING _)'

I( NATURAL

VEGETATION
I
I
I
I
17 EXISTING TREES TO BE

REMOVED
I
I
I --._

I ---- ----/ ---- ----

GATE TO REMAIN NEW TUBE STEEL

FENCE AT WEST

PROPERTY LINE
/
�
XISTING ROLLI�......._ ......._
I ""'

PROPERTY LINE
I

NEW CONCRETE
CURB
I
ir--c::---:..1 2
1 EXISTING

PARKING

EXISTING
PAVING
_)'

VAN ACCESSIBLE

PARKING STALL
'-0" 12'-0''
86 97

EXISTING BACKFLOW

PREVENTER

EXISTING MONUMENT

SIGN TO BE REMOVED
96 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE -�

PARKING STALLS
87 88
�
9'-0' 5'-0"
IJ
89 IJ IJ
90 91

SITE PLAN - PROPOSED
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0'
'-0' 9'-0"
IJ
92 93

EXISTING BUILDING
±15,854S.F.

NEW ROLLING GATE

TO BE INSTALLED

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER

METERS AND BACKFLOW

PREVENTER
NORTH
5 EXISTING ROLLING

GATE TO REMAIN

EXISTING TRANSFORMER

PROPERTY LINE

IN) CHAIN-LINK FENCE
0 10' 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20' -0"

PROJECT TEAM
OWNER:

WELLSPACE HEALTH
1500 EXPO PARKWAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95815
ARCHITECT:

API ARCHITECTURE PLUS, INC.
4335-B NORTH STAR WAY
MODESTO, CA 95356
PHONE: (209) 577-466 l
FAX: (209) 577-0213
CONTACT: BRIAN ROSENBERGER
[email protected]

SITE DATA
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER:

PROPERTY AREA:

BUILDING COVERAGE (OF PROJECT AREA}:

HARDSCAPING (OF PROJECT AREA}
LANDSCAPING (OF PROJECT AREA}:

CURRENT ZONE:

GENERAL PLAN:

PROPOSED ZONING:

BUILDING DATA
BUILDING AREA:

BUILDING USE:

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:

PARKING DATA

PARKING REQUIRED
SPACE l - DENTAL OFFICE
±6,333 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA
±6,333 I 150 =
SPACE 2 - MEDICAL OFFICE
±9,393 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA
±9,393 I 150 =
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED:

PARKING PROVIDED
STANDARD/ COMPACT SPACES:

ACCESSIBLE SPACES:
- STANDARD SPACES:
- VAN SPACES:

TOTAL:

NOTE:

VICINITY MAP
DEVELOPER/ APPLICANT:

LEGACY REALTY & DEVELOPMENT
5390 E PINE AVENUE
FRESNO, CA. 95616
PHONE: (559) 977-0748
CONTACT: JEFF MILGROM
[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER/

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION
2120 20TH ST. SUITE 3
SACRAMENTO, CA 95818
PHONE: (916) 455-2026
CONTACT: CHARLES KRAFKA
[email protected]
015-162-006
73,669 SQ. FT. / l.69 AC
15,998 SQ, FT, (22%}
+/-42,027 SQ. FT. (57%}
+/-15,078 SQ. FT. (21%}

MP - INDUSTRIAL/ BUSINESS PARK
CC· COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL

SA - SPECIAL AREA
15,998 SQ. FT.

DENTAL/ MEDICAL OFFICE
29'-0"

WELLSPACE HEALTH

PLACER COMMUNITY

HEALTH CENTER
100 STONEHOUSE COURT
ROSEVILLE, CA.
42 STALLS
63 STALLS
l 05 STALLS
94 STALLS
4 STALLS
l STALL
99 STALLS
PLANNING■■■
ARCHITECTURE■■■ ■ ■
I

ARCHITECTURE PLUS INC,
4335-B NORTH STAR WAY
MODESTO, CA 95356
ph. 209 .577.4661
Ix. 209 .577 .0213
www.apiarc.com

THIS CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN WAS DEVELOPED WITH SITE BOUNDARY

INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE OWNER, API IS NOT RESPONSIBLE

FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION,
SHEET:

Al
i
�a
�
�
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------aplCOPYRIGHT20'23 _______________ _.;;

PC EXHIBIT D

api COPYRIGHT 2023
R:\23105\001_DESIGN\Planning Submittal\Existing Roof Plan.dwg 2-28-24 11:56:39 AM SRamiro ARCHITECTURE PLUS INC.
4335-B NORTH STAR WAY
MODESTO, CA 95356
ph. 209.577.4661
fx. 209.577.0213
www.apiarc.com

PLANNING

ARCHITECTURE

PLACER COMMUNITY
100 STONEHOUSE COURT
ROSEVILLE, CA.

HEALTH CENTER

WELLSPACE HEALTH
SHEET:

A5

EXISTING ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
NORTH

EXISTING ROOF SLOPE

TO REMAIN AS IS

EXISTING ROOF SLOPE

TO REMAIN AS IS

MECHANICAL WELL
api COPYRIGHT 2023
R:\23105\001_DESIGN\Planning Submittal\Proposed Roof Plan.dwg 2-28-24 11:56:44 AM SRamiro ARCHITECTURE PLUS INC.
4335-B NORTH STAR WAY
MODESTO, CA 95356
ph. 209.577.4661
fx. 209.577.0213
www.apiarc.com

PLANNING

ARCHITECTURE

PLACER COMMUNITY
100 STONEHOUSE COURT
ROSEVILLE, CA.

HEALTH CENTER

WELLSPACE HEALTH
SHEET:

A6

PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
NORTH
2 : 12
2 : 12

EXISTING ROOF

METAL CANOPY

EXISTING ROOF
+22'-0"
20'-0"2'-0"
T.O. PLATE

STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF

STEAL BEAM
11'-0"
+22'-0"
20'-0"2'-0"
T.O. PLATE
+22'-0"
T.O. BEAM

STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF

METAL CANOPY

EXISTING MECHANICAL
WELL
10'-0"29'-0"4'-0"

STEAL BEAM
11'-0"
+22'-0"
T.O. BEAM
10'-0"29'-0"

D
D
S
S
W
S
W IRR
IRR
E
E
E
AC
AC
C
C
CC
C
CC
C
CC
S 45°11'43" E 149.50'
S 4°24'26" E 61.90'
S 89°33'17" W 51.00'
S 50°10'17" W 49.53'
S 48°56'43" E 222.00'
N 34°05'47" E 229.00'
N 53°45'14" W 349.82'
S 34°33'17" W 62.50'
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento Office Davis Office
CECWEST.COM
1 WELLSPACE HEALTH PLACER COMMUNITY

HEALTH CENTER
LEGEND

TAYLOR ROAD

PROPERTY
LINE

PROPERTY
LINE

RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE

RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE

PROPERTY/RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

EXISTING CONTOUR

12.5'
P.U.E.
2575-O.R.-759

12.5'
P.U.E.
2575-O.R.-759

GENERAL NOTES

1. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE LIMITED TO SITE ACCESSIBILITY.

2. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORDS.

ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.

EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
C1

EXISTING SITE UTILITY & GRADING PLAN

STONEHOUSE COURT

EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE ARROW

EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE TO REMAIN

EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET TO REMAIN
D
S

EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE TO REMAIN

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE TO REMAIN

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT TO REMAIN

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TO REMAIN

EXISTING WATER LINE TO REMAIN

EXISTING WATER VALVE TO REMAIN

EXISTING WATER METER TO REMAIN

EXISTING BACKFLOW PREVENTER TO REMAIN

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN
W

EXISTING BUILDING SEWER

SERVICE TO REMAIN

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

OF EXISTING BUILDING

SEWER SERVICE TO REMAIN

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING

BUILDING WATER SERVICE TO REMAIN

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF

EXISTING BUILDING FIRE

WATER SERVICE TO REMAIN
LIMITS OF A.C. PAVEMENT GRIND AND OVERLAY

LIMITS OF SLURRY SEAL

PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING REDWOOD

TREES TO BE REMOVED

EXISTING TREE TO BE

REMOVED

EXISTING TREE TO BE

REMOVED

PROPOSED TREE - REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS
W/H
W/H
D
S
W
W IRR
IRR
E
E
E
AC
AC
C

TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW
ACER RUBRUM OCTOBER GLORY RED MAPLE 15 GAL L 40`X30`
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE 15 GAL L 15`X20`

X FAURIEI 'NATCHEZ'

EXISTING TREE (REFER TO PLAN FOR SPECIES) REFER TO PLAN NA NA NA

GROUNDCOVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM 'RED VELVET' RED VELVET YARROW 1 GAL L 3`X4` BACCHARIS PILULARIS `PIGEON POINT` PIGEON POINT COYOTE BRUSH 1 GAL L 1`X8`

GRASSES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 1 GAL L 4`X4`
PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES FOUNTAIN GRASS 5 GAL L 2`X2`

LARGE SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW PHORMIUM TENAX `YELLOW WAVE` NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GAL L 5`X5

MEDIUM SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS `LITTLE JOHN` LITTLE JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH 1 GAL L 3`X3` DIETES VEGETA AFRICAN IRIS 1 GAL L 3`X3`
EPILOBIUM CANUM CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA 1 GAL L 4`X4`

SMALL SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW BERBERIS THUNBERGII `CRIMSON PYGMY` CRIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY 5 GAL M 2`X3` HEMEROCALLIS X `STELLA DE ORO` DWARF DAYLILY 1 GAL L 2`X2` SALVIA X JAMENSIS `IGNITION PURPLE` IGNITION PURPLE SALVIA 1 GAL L 2`X3`

LAWN - GRASS/SOD BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW

BOLERO - SOD GRASS SOD L

REPRESENTATIVE PLANTING LEGEND

TREES ALONG SOUTHERN PROPERTY
LINE TO BE SAVED.

CONTRACTOR TO PRUNE TREES AND
CLEAN UP/CLEAR GROUND LEVEL.

L1.0

PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN

STONEHOUSE COURT

NEW IRRIGATION

POINT OF

CONNECTION
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento Office Davis Office
CECWEST.COM
2 WELLSPACE HEALTH PLACER COMMUNITY

HEALTH CENTER
NORTH

I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER EFFICIENT

LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED SUCH CRITERIA FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN.

WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER'S SIGNATURE DATE
THIS REPRESENTATIVE PLANT LIST IS PRELIMINARY AND NOT INTENDED TO BE COMPLETE OR FINAL.

THE PLANT SPECIES LISTED ABOVE PROVIDE A GENERAL LIST OF PLANT MATERIALS FOR REFERENCE THAT MAY BE USED AS PART OF THE FINAL PLANTING DESIGN.

FINAL PLANT SPECIES WILL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PACKAGE

AND WILL BE SELECTED WITH A FOCUS ON LOW WATER USE, AND WILL BE NATIVE TO ADAPTIVE SPECIES WHEN POSSIBLE.

REPRESENTATIVE PLANTING LEGEND NOTE:

TREES ALONG SOUTHERN PROPERTY
LINE TO BE SAVED.

CONTRACTOR TO PRUNE TREES AND
CLEAN UP/CLEAR GROUND LEVEL.

STAFF

BREAK AREA

PROPOSED VISITOR

WAITING PATIO

VISITOR /

CHILDREN'S

PLAY LAWN

DECOMPOSED GRANITE

PLANTING STRIP

EXISTING

XYLOSMA

HEDGE TO BE
REMOVED.

EXISTING REDWOOD TREES
TO BE REMOVED.

NEW LANDSCAPE PLANTING,

SEE PLANTING LEGEND

NEW PROJECT

MONUMENT SIGN

NEW TUBE STEEL

FENCING TO BE
INSTALLED. SEE DETAIL
#1 THIS SHEET

NEW TUBE STEEL

FENCING TO BE
INSTALLED. SEE DETAIL
#1 THIS SHEET

EXISTING

XYLOSMA

HEDGE TO BE
REMOVED.

NEW LANDSCAPE

PLANTING, SEE

PLANTING LEGEND

NEW LANDSCAPE

PLANTING, SEE

PLANTING LEGEND

EXISTING PROJECT

MONUMENT SIGN TO BE REMOVED

NEW LANDSCAPE PLANTING,

SEE PLANTING LEGEND
L LC C
NOTES:

1. DETAIL DEMONSTRATES DESIGN INTENT ONLY AND IS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. FIELD VERIFY

ALL DIMENSIONS AND SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS WITH ALL MATERIALS, PARTS AND FINISHES TO OWNER REPRESENTATIVE FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

2. TUBE STEEL FENCING SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND POWDER COATED. COLOR SHALL BE BLACK.

3. ALL STEEL POSTS, RAILS AND PICKETS SHALL BE SHOP WELDED AND GROUND SMOOTH. FIELD WELDS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED.

4. ALL GATE HARDWARE SHALL BE PAINTED SAME COLOR AS FENCING.

5. GATE AND HARDWARE TO MEET ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. CODES TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THIS DETAIL.

STANDARD FENCE CAPS
1-1/2" SQ. TOP RAIL,

CONTINUOUS
2" X 2" SQ. METAL POST
3/4" SQ. TUBULAR
STEEL PICKETS AT 4" O.C. TYP.
1-1/2" SQ. BOTTOM

RAIL, CONTINUOUS

FINISH GRADE

STANDARD FENCE CAPS

TUBE STEEL FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING

NOT TO SCALE

CONCRETE FOOTING
1 P-RE-CHI-29

EXISTING TREES

TO BE SAVED

NEW LANDSCAPE

PLANTING, SEE

PLANTING LEGEND

NEW LANDSCAPE

PLANTING, SEE

PLANTING LEGEND
D
S
W
W IRR
IRR
E
E
E
AC
AC
C
W/H
W/H
30H
30H
30H
30H30H
30H
30H30H30H30H30H30H30H30H
30H
30TQ
20F
20F
20F
20F
30H
30H
30H
30H
30H
30H
30H
30H
30TQ
20Q

TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE HXW
ACER RUBRUM OCTOBER GLORY RED MAPLE 15 GAL L 40`X30`
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE 15 GAL L 15`X15`

X FAURIEI 'NATCHEZ'

EXISTING TREE (REFER TO PLAN FOR SPECIES) REFER TO PLAN NA NA NA

GROUNDCOVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME

REPRESENTATIVE PLANTING LEGEND
L1.1

PARKING LOT SHADE CALCULATIONS

STONEHOUSE COURT
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento Office Davis Office
CECWEST.COM
2 WELLSPACE HEALTH PLACER COMMUNITY

HEALTH CENTER
NORTH

PARKING LOT/PAVED AREA

PARKING LOT SHADE CALCULATIONS

E
E
E
AC
AC
C

C CC C CC CC C
S 45°11'43" E 149.50'
S 4°24'26" E 61.90'
S 89°33'17" W 51.00'
S 50°10'17" W 49.53'
S 48°56'43" E 222.00'
N 34°05'47" E 229.00'
N 53°45'14" W 349.82'
S 34°33'17" W 62.50'

STONEHOUSE COURT

TAYLOR ROAD
E
E
E
AC
AC
C

C CC C CC CC C
S 45°11'43" E 149.50'
S 4°24'26" E 61.90'
S 89°33'17" W 51.00'
S 50°10'17" W 49.53'
S 48°56'43" E 222.00'
N 34°05'47" E 229.00'
N 53°45'14" W 349.82'
S 34°33'17" W 62.50'

STONEHOUSE COURT

TAYLOR ROAD

CALIFORNIAROSEVILLE
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento Office Davis Office
CECWEST.COM
1 FOR

ZONING EXHIBIT
Z-1

EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS

VICINITY MAP
NTS

SUMMARY TABLE

DESIGNATIONZONINGEXISTING PROPOSED
MPINDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS PARK1.691 AC. ±
CC/SACOMMUNITY COMMERCIAL / SPECIAL AREA0
0 1.691 AC.

PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS
100 STONEHOUSE
COURT

WELLSPACE HEALTH PLACER

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER

CC EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 5428 OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED

WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the rezone specified herein, and makes the following findings pursuant to Section 19.86.050 of the Zoning Ordinance:

1. The rezone is in conformance with the public interest, health, safety, or welfare of the City; and

2. The rezone is consistent with the objectives, policies, programs, and land use designations of the City of Roseville General Plan.

SECTION 2. Section 19.06.020 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Roseville, Ordinance No. 5428, is amended to change the zoning of that portion of certain real property located on Parcel 198 of the Infill area in the City of Roseville, as shown and so designated in Exhibit “A,” attached and incorporated herein by reference is hereby rezoned from Industrial/Business Park (MP) to Community Commercial/Specia Area (CC/SA).

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll
call: AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3568
File #:
0215
Title:

WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing Project - Fee Deferrals and Government Financing Agreement
Contact:

Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 8.2.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to:

1. Approve an extended fee deferral in the amount of $2,220,328, plus interest;

2. Approve a fee deferral of parks impact fees in the amount of $1,007,424, plus interest; and

3. Approve a Government Financing Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute it and all necessary documents on behalf of the City to effectuate its purpose for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing Project located at 4201 Santucci Boulevard.

BACKGROUND
This staff report shall serve as the economic development subsidy summary report pursuant to California Government Code Section 53083. The City of Roseville offers a fee deferral program through the Economic Development Department as an incentive to encourage development. Recently, with a goal of incentivizing affordable housing developments, City Council adopted an ordinance amending Section

4.04.040 of the Roseville Municipal Code to allow extended fee deferrals for affordable housing projects that meet the following requirements:

1 .

Projects shall consist of 100 percent affordable units (except manager units); 2 .

Projects shall comply with the City’s Objective Design Standards; 3 .

Property owners shall agree to enter into an Affordable Housing Rental Agreement; 4 .

Property owners shall agree to enter into a promissory note for the deferred fee amount that is secured by a deed of trust and/or other acceptable security interest; and 5 .

Applicants shall follow all other requirements of Section 4.04.040, including paying a fee and interest.

On August 23, 2024, Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP, with a principal address at 445 Central Ave., Suite 200, Highland Park, IL 60036, through its project representative Ten South Construction, LLC, submitted a request for an extended fee deferral of City-controlled development impact fees for a 192-unit affordable apartment complex. The application is attached hereto. At that time, it was determined that one of the City- controlled fees (typically associated with the standard fee deferral process) did not qualify for the extended deferral program. As such, the applicant is now requesting two separate fee deferrals: 1) a standard fee deferral of park development fees totaling $1,007,424 due at issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and 2) an extended fee deferral for other approved City fees totaling $2,220,328 due no later than one year past issuance of a certificate of occupancy or three years past issuance of the first building permit, whichever is earlier.

In addition to the deferrals noted above, a Government Financing Agreement has been prepared to memorialize the developer’s commitment to meet the obligations under the Roseville Municipal Code and in the promissory note consistent with the terms of the extended fee deferral program.

EVALUATION

The WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing development is proposed at 4201 Santucci Boulevard.

As shown on the attached plans, the project includes construction of a 192-unit affordable apartment complex (190 low-income senior units and two (2) manager units) within three buildings, plus a community center and outdoor community area on 5.11 acres. The project meets the criteria for an affordable housing project, as it provides 100 percent of the units (except manager units) as affordable units for low income.

The Affordable Housing Rental Agreement will memorialize the commitment for the project to be 100% affordable and will appear as a separate Council action item presented by the City’s Housing Division. The project has already been deemed to comply with the City’s Objective Design Standards as outlined in the approved Planning entitlement issued on January 23, 2024 (PL22-0345).

The City finds that the public purpose of this fee deferral is to promote the general welfare of the City and its residents by creating new jobs, expanding the range and diversity of its affordable housing, and assisting the City with its State-required Regional Housing Needs Allocation. This fee deferral is consistent with and in furtherance of the City's Economic Development Strategy and will serve to generate increased sales tax revenue, special taxes to fund Community Facilities Districts, and job creation during construction and beyond, though exact numbers are unknown at this time.

Fee estimates have been prepared for the various
buildings/building permits for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing project, based on the fees for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Only City-controlled impact fees are eligible for deferral. The eligible fee types and amounts are identified below:

Deferrable Fee
Clubhouse-Bldg 1
64-unit Apt Bldg
Total Deferrable
Fees
Fire Service Construction Fee
$ 1,199.59
$ 32,338.10

Public Facilities Fee
$ -
$ 141,952.00

Local Sewer Fee
$ 826.87
$ 29,248.00

Water Connection Fee -Domestic
$ -
$ 315,264.00

Drainage Fees (Pleasant Grove Creek)
$ -
$ 33,792.64

Traffic Mitigation Fee
$ -
$ 94,234.08

Bike Trail
$ -
$ 3,776.00

Public Benefit Fee
$ -
$ 54,080.00

Solid Waste Fee
$ 922.76
$ 8,896.00

Electric Backbone Fee
$ 5,350.39
$ 23,761.92

Total Fees per Building
$ 8,299.61
$ 737,342.74

TOTAL
$ 8,299.61
$ 2,212,028.23
$2,220,327.84

As shown above, the total eligible fee deferral for the project (inclusive of the club house and three apartment buildings) totals approximately $2,220,328. The request is to allow these fees to be deferred for a maximum of one year past issuance of a certificate of occupancy or three years past issuance of the first building permit, whichever is earlier. The list of fees eligible for deferral has been vetted by the applicable City departments and only those determined to have no impact to the budget have been included. In an effort to cover lost interest resulting from the fee deferral, there is an interest charge of 5% that will be paid upon payment of the deferred fees. The Roseville Municipal Code (RMC) additionally identifies an administrative processing fee of $1,500 to be charged per building permit to cover staff's time of processing and tracking this request.

An additional deferral is requested for parks development impact fees. While parks fees are typically included on the list of fees eligible for deferral, it was determined during the review process of the requested extended fee deferral that these fees are needed more urgently and would not qualify for the requested extended fee deferral that these fees are needed more urgently and would not qualify for the extended fee program. A separate action is therefore requested to allow the following parks fees to be deferred through the standard fee deferral process for multi-family projects. The parks development impact fees are as follows:

Deferrable Fee
64-unit Apt Bldg
Citywide Parks
$118,208.00
Neighborhood Parks
$126,400.00
Citywide In-Lieu
$82,432.00
Neighborhood In-Lieu
$8,768.00
Total Fees per Building
$335,808.00
TOTAL
$1,007,424
.00

This fee deferral would allow the $1,007,424 in parks development impact fees to be deferred to building permit final/certificate of occupancy. Interest equivalent to the city’s pooled interest rate (1.35%) plus an administrative fee ($981) would be charged for the deferred fees. The City’s Parks Department has reviewed this request and is supportive.

Pursuant to RMC Section 4.04.040, all multi-family residential fee deferrals greater than $100,000 dollars are required to be approved by the City Council. Additionally, as mentioned above, extended fee deferrals for affordable housing projects are required to enter into a promissory note for the deferred fee amount that is secured by a deed of trust and/or other acceptable security interest. The promissory note is signed by the developer to acknowledge their commitment to meeting the obligations for payment of fees and securing a deed of trust. To memorialize the developer’s commitment to meet the obligations outlined in the promissory note, a Government Financing Agreement has been prepared (with the promissory note included as Exhibit C to the agreement).

The Government Financing Agreement is meant to ensure compliance with the RMC Section 4.04.040.

Council is requested to adopt a resolution approving the attached Government Financing Agreement and granting authority for City Manager to execute it and all necessary documents to effectuate its purpose for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing Project at 4201 Santucci Boulevard.

FISCAL IMPACT
The requested deferrals will not result in a negative impact to the City’s General Fund or the affected development impact fee programs. Administrative fees equivalent to staff’s time necessary to process and track the deferrals will be charged to each associated building permit and interest will be charged on all monies deferred. Furthermore, the City's fee deferral program is an important economic development tool that facilitates new development that may not otherwise be financially feasible without this program. As a result, this program has the potential to catalyze investment that directly increases property values and results in temporary construction jobs and permanent full and part time jobs. Additionally, this project will assist the City in meeting RHNA obligations.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15061(c)(3) and §15378. These fee deferrals meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Affordable Housing Fee Deferral Application
Parks Fee Deferral Application
Plans
Resolution 24-341
Resolution 24-342
Resolution 24-343
Government Financing Agreement

4 Stories64 UNITS
4 Stories64 UNITS

SANTUCCI BLVD

SOLAIRE DR

DIAL-A-RIDE

MOTORCYCLE PARKING
C
CC
CCC
CCC
CCCCC
C
C C
C C

C CCCCCC CCCCC
CCCC
C

MOTORCYCLE PARKING
M8
C
C
M7 M9 M10 M11
6 SHORT TERM BICYCLELONG TERM BICYCLE
4 Stories64 UNITS
C C C
STOP
STOP

AMENITY

BUILDING

BOCCE BALL

33.33'

22.85'
21'
40' LANDSCAPE
40' LANDSCAPE
40' LANDSCAPE
40' LANDSCAPE
40' LANDSCAPE

21.83'
16'
18'
16'
14'
14'
16'
16'
16'
26'
26'16'
26'
24'
26' 16'16'
16'
42'
24'
26'
6'
26'
17'
17'42'
26'
6'
16'
15'SEWER
ESMT

RELOCATED

EX LIGHT POLE
A
-

PARKING STALL STRIPING
N.T.S.
16' STANDARD
(WITH 2' OVERHANG)
9 9
14' COMPACT
(WITH 2' OVERHANG)
20"
4" WIDTH
WHITE
STRIPE
20"
4" WIDTH
WHITE
STRIPE
MIN. WALK WIDTH ADJACENT

TO PARKING STALLS
6 MIN. WALK WIDTH ADJACENT

TO PARKING STALLS
6 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 in = 30 ft
0 15 30 30 60
WESTBROOK PARCEL WB-32

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
SHEET 1 of 5
AUGUST 21, 2023

PROJECT SUMMARY

SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN
PARCEL WB-32
TOTAL UNITS: 192
PERMITTED # OF UNITS: 128
DENSITY BONUS: 50.0%
100% SENIOR AFFORDABLE
SITE AREA: 5.11 ACRES
DENSITY: 37.57 DU/AC
ZONING:

EXISTING: High Density Residential (HDR) / R3
PROPOSED: High Density Residential (HDR) / R3

LOCATION MAP
SITE
web: www.mpengr.com
600 Coolidge Dr., Suite #140
Folsom, CA 95630
phone: (916) 984-7621
Fresno*Folsom
WB-21

MDR / RS-DS
WB-22

MDR / RS-DS
BUILDING FLOOR AREA:
64-PLEX (3): 17,100 sf
51,300 sf
AMENITY: 2,714 sf
TOTAL: 54,014 sf
PERCENT LOT COVERAGE: 25.3%
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:
64-PLEX: 45 feet
AMENITY: 25 feet
PARKING:

PARKING REQUIRED (1/UNIT + 10% GUEST): 211 SPACES
AUTO PARKING PROVIDED: 168 SPACES
COMPACT AUTO PROVIDED (18%): 38 SPACE
MOTORCYCLE PARKING (5%): 11 SPACES
TOTAL PROVIDED: 217 SPACES
Dwg: X:\2022\22-0079-00 (SVSP-PARCEL WB-32)\DWG\PLAN\WORKING\220079-P01-SP01.DWG | Saved: 04-20-23 04:10pm SBRYSONDwg: X:\2022\22-0079-00 (SVSP-PARCEL WB-32)\DWG\PLAN\WORKING\220079-P01-GP01.DWG | Saved: 04-10-23 04:25pm SBRYSON LEGEND

ACCESSIBLE PATH
ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture | Branding
Interiors | Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com
The Canel Companies
1949 St. John's Ave. Suite 200
Highland Park, IL 60035
WB-3 - ROSEVILLE SENIOR HOUSING
ROSEVILLE, CA # 2020-0670

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
NOVEMBER 04, 2022A0-01 TITLE SHEET

ROSEVILLE, CA
WB-32 ROSEVILLE SENIOR HOUSING

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

PRELIMINARY REVIEW
-32
-32

RESOLUTION NO. 24-341

APPROVING FEE DEFERRALS FOR THE
WB-32 ROSEVILLE SENIOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has offered a fee deferral program through the Economic Development Department since the mid 1990’s to encourage development; and

WHEREAS, the Economic Development Department received a request from Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP, requesting a fee deferral of certain development impact fees; and

WHEREAS, the fee deferral program and California Government Code Section 53083 require City Council approval, and the program requires that the deferred fees be paid prior to the earlier of one year past issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or three years past issuance of first building permit; and

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2024, the City Council for the City of Roseville held a public hearing, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53083, on a fee deferral to WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing Project with Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP; and

WHEREAS, staff recommends City Council approve the City fee deferral to development impact fees until building permit final/certificate of occupancy permit of approximately $2,220,328, plus interest, for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing project; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville after holding a public hearing that the City fee deferral to building permit final/certificate of occupancy permit in the approximate amount of $2,220,328, plus interest, for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing project is hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 24-342

APPROVING PARK DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRALS FOR THE WB-32 ROSEVILLE SENIOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has offered a fee deferral program through the Economic Development Department since the mid 1990’s to encourage development; and

WHEREAS, the Economic Development Department received a request from Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP, requesting a fee deferral of park development impact fees; and

WHEREAS, the fee deferral program and California Government Code Section 53083 require City Council approval, and the program requires that the deferred fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Building Permit Occupancy/Final permit as applicable to each permit; and

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2024, the City Council for the City of Roseville held a public hearing, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53083, on a fee deferral to WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing Project with Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP; and

WHEREAS, staff recommends City Council approve the City fee deferral to park development impact fees until building permit final/certificate of occupancy permit of approximately $1,007,424, plus interest, for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing project; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville after holding a public hearing that the City fee deferral to building permit final/certificate of occupancy permit in the approximate amount of $1,007,424, plus interest, for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing project is hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 24-343

APPROVING A GOVERNMENT FINANCING AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ROSEVILLE SENIOR AFFORDABLE 2 LP, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT AND ALL NECESSARY

DOCUMENTS TO EFFECTUATE ITS PURPOSE ON BEHALF

OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a government financing agreement for the WB-32 development impact fees for the Roseville Senior Affordable Housing project located at 4201 Santucci Boulevard, by and between the City of Roseville and Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said government financing agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all necessary documents to effectuate its purpose on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description
The land described herein is situated in the State of California, County of Placer, City of Roseville, described as follows:

Lot 8, as shown and designated on the map en�tled "Westbrook Phases 2 & 3", filed for record December 8, 2016 in Book DD of Maps at Page 79, Placer County Records, and amended by Cer�ficate of Correc�on recorded March 21, 2017, as Instrument No. 2017-0020719, Official Records.

APN: 496-100-034-000

Defferable Fee Clubhouse-Bldg 1 64-unit Apt Bldg
Total Deferrable
Fees
Fire Service Construction Fee (Sierra Vista Westbrook DA) 1,199.59$ 32,338.10$ Public Facilities Fee -$ 141,952.00$ Local Sewer Fee 826.87$ 29,248.00$
Sewer Special Benefit Area -$ -$ Water Connection Fee -Domestic -$ 315,264.00$ Water Connection Fee -Irrigation (recycled) -$ -$ Water Pressure Zone Fee -$ -$
Drainage Fees (Pleasant Grove Creek) -$ 33,792.64$ Traffic Mitigation Fee -$ 94,234.08$ Bike Trail -$ 3,776.00$
Public Benefit Fee -$ 54,080.00$ Solid Waste Fee 922.76$ 8,896.00$
Electric Backbone Fee 5,350.39$ 23,761.92$ Total Fees per Building 8,299.60$ 737,342.74$ TOTAL 8,299.60$ 2,212,028.23$ 2,220,327.84$

[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\CITYATTORNEY\speakerjoseph\Desktop\Extended Fee Deferral Promissory Note Final Clean 9.17.24.doc: 9/17/24]

PROMISSORY NOTE
Extended Development Impact Fee Payment Program

$2,220,327.84 _____________________, 20____

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ROSEVILLE SENIOR AFFORDABLE 2 LP, a California Limited Partnership, (“Developer”), hereby promises to pay to the order of the THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a municipal corporation, whose address is 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, 95678 (“ City”), the sum, which represents required development impact fees , in the amount equal to two million two hundred and twenty thousand three hundred and twenty- seven dollars and eighty- four cents ($2,220,327.84). Developer also promises to pay to the order of City accrued interest on the principal balance at the rate of five (5% ) in accordance with the payment terms stipulated below.

1. DEVELOPER’S OBLIGATION. This Promissory Note (“Note”) evidences the obligation of Developer to City for the payment of development impact fees pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Section 4.04.040, on the project known as:
______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________ located at _________________(“ Project”).

These development impact fees are normally due upon final approval of a building permit and are being paid per the term of this Note and the Government Financing Agreement between Developer and City, which is incorporated fully herein. Developer agrees to cause a Deed of Trust to be recorded on the property of the Project as security for this Note.

2. TERM. This Note shall be due and payable no later than the earlier of: 1) one (1) year after the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project, or first final approval of a building permit if no certificate of occupancy is required for the Project, or 2) three (3) years after the issuance of the first building permit for the Project.

3. AMOUNT AND TIME OF PAYMENT. Developer shall pay the full principal balance, plus interest at the rate of five (5%), no later than the earlier of: 1) one (1) year after the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project, or first final approval of a building permit if no certificate of occupancy is required for the Project, or 2) three (3) years after the issuance of the first building permit for the Project.

4. LATE PAYMENTS. If any payment under this Note is not received by City within ten (10) calendar days after the payment is due, Developer shall pay to City a late charge of five percent (5%) of such payment. Such late charge shall be immediately due and payable without demand by City.

5. MATURITY DATE. The full amount of the outstanding principal advanced under this Note, together with all accrued but unpaid interest thereon shall be due and payable in full, on the earliest of:
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\CITYATTORNEY\speakerjoseph\Desktop\Extended Fee Deferral Promissory Note Final Clean 9.17.24.doc: 9/17/24]

2 A. No later than the earlier of: 1) one (1) year after the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project , or first final approval of a building permit if no certificate of occupancy is required for the Project, or 2) three (3) years after the issuance of the first building permit for the Project; or

B. An Event of Default by Developer as defined in Paragraph 10 of this Note which has not been cured in the manner and time provided in Paragraph 11 this Note.

6. PLACE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT. All amounts due and payable under this Note are payable at the following address, City of Roseville Attn: Finance Department, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678, or at such other place as City may designate to Developer in writing from time to time, in any currency of the United States which on the date of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts.

7. PREPAYMENT OF LOAN. No prepayment penalty will be charged to Developer for payment of any portion of this Note prior to the end of the loan term.

8. WAIVERS BY DEVELOPER. Presentment, notice of dishonor, and protest are waived by all makers, sureties, guarantors, and endorsers of this Note.

9. DEFAULT AND ACCELERATION. Developer agrees that the unpaid balance of the principal amount of this Note, together with all accrued interest thereon and charges owing, shall, at the option of City , become immediately due and payable upon any Event of Default as defined in Paragraph 10 of this Note which has not been cured pursuant to Paragraph 11 of this Note, including without limitation the failure of Developer to make any payment when due.

10. EVENT OF DEFAULT DEFINED. For purposes of this Note, an “Event of Default” is defined as follows:

A. Developer defaults in the payment of any principal or interest when due.

B. City discovers that Developer has failed to disclose or has misrepresented any fact deemed by City to be material or which would have prevented Developer from being eligible for this program or to pay the impact fees by the Note.

C. Developer defaults or breaches any of the terms or conditions of this Note or the Government Financing Agreement.

D. Developer becomes insolvent or bankrupt or is unable to pay its debts as they mature or makes a general assignment of or enters into any arrangement with creditors.

E. Proceedings for the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator of the assets of Developer or a substantial part of such assets, being authorized or instituted by or against the Developer.
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\CITYATTORNEY\speakerjoseph\Desktop\Extended Fee Deferral Promissory Note Final Clean 9.17.24.doc: 9/17/24]

3 F. Proceedings under any bankruptcy, reorganization, readjustment of debt, insolvency, dissolution, liquidation or other similar law of any jurisdiction being authorized or instituted against Developer.

11. CURE OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES . In the event of any breach or violation under this Note, City shall give written notice to Developer specifying: (a) the nature of the breach or violation; (b) the action required to cure the breach or violation, if an action to cure is possible; and (c) a date, which shall not be less than fifteen (15) calendar days from the mailing of the notice, but which such action to cure must be taken, if an action to cure is possible. If Developer fails to cure the breach or violation within the time frame specified in the notice, or if a cure is not possible, City has the right, at its election, to : (a) proceed directly against Developer to recover any and all loss, damage, liability, action, cause of action, cost or expense (including without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by City; or (b) pursue any other remedy allowed at law or in equity.

12. CONSENTS AND APPROVALS. Any consent or approval required under this Note shall not be unreasonably withheld.

13. NOTICES. Any notice, communications, or demands shall be in writing and may be communicated to City or Developer at the addresses set forth in the introductory paragraph of this Note.

14. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS. All provisions of this Note shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest, transferees and assigns of Developer and City.

15. NO RELATIONSHIP. Nothing in this Note shall create any relationship between Developer and City, other than a debtor-creditor relationship. Developer and City shall not be partners, joint venturers, equity venturers, or any other form of partnership or venture.

16. ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION. Developer shall not assign any of its interests under this Note to any other party without the prior written consent of City . Any unauthorized assignment shall be void.

17. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This Note shall be interpreted under and governed by the laws of the State of California, except for those provisions preempted by federal law. Any action arising out of this Note shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie.

18. SEVERABILITY. Every provision of this Note is intended to be severable. If any provision of this Note is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected or impaired.

[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\CITYATTORNEY\speakerjoseph\Desktop\Extended Fee Deferral Promissory Note Final Clean 9.17.24.doc: 9/17/24]

4 19. TIME. Time is of the essence in this Note.

20. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS. In the event of any Event of Default, or any legal action is commenced to interpret or to enforce the terms of this Note, the prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to recover all reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in such action. In addition, Developer agrees to pay City all reasonable costs incurred in collection of amounts due under this Note which are not paid by the due date as specified herein, whether or not a legal action has been filed.

21. WAIVER. Any waiver by City of any obligation in this Note must be in writing.

No waiver shall be implied from any delay or failure by City to take action on any breach or default by Developer or to pursue any remedy allowed under this Note or applicable law. Any extension of time granted to Developer to perform any obligation under this Note must be in writing signed by City and shall not operate as a waiver or release from any of Developer ’s obligations under the Note. Developer hereby waives all defenses and pleas on the grounds of any extensions of the time for repayment of any amounts due under this Note, unless City has granted such extensions in writing. Consent by City to any act or omission by Developer shall not be construed to be a consent to any other act or omission or to waive the requirement for City’s written consent to future waivers.

22. SUBORDINATION. Except as expressly set forth herein, this Note, at the request of Developer and as approved by City, shall be subordinated in priority to any third-party lender having a lien on the property of the Project.

23. AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS. Any amendments or modifications to this Note must be in writing, and shall be effective only if executed by both Developer and City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer has executed this Note at ___________________________, on ____________________________, 20______.

DEVELOPER:

Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP

By: CERC Roseville SA2 Holdings LLC
Its: Managing General Partner
By: Community Economic Redevelopment Corporation
of Wisconsin, a Wisconsin not for profit corporation
Its: Sole Member

[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\CITYATTORNEY\speakerjoseph\Desktop\Extended Fee Deferral Promissory Note Final Clean 9.17.24.doc: 9/17/24]

5 By:

Scott I. Canel, President

By: Roseville SA2 Admin GP LLC
Its: Administrative General Partner

By:_______________________________
Scott I. Canel, Manager

[Notarization Required]

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

ATTN: City Clerk
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

(EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES GOV’T CODE 27383)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS

THIS DEED OF TRUST, Made this________ day of ______________, 20___, Between Roseville Senior Affordable 2 LP herein called TRUSTOR address is ___________________, TITLE COMPANY, herein called Trustee, and CITY OF ROSEVILLE, herein called BENEFICIARY. Witnesseth: That Trustor irrevocably GRANTS, TRANSFERS AND ASSIGNS TO TRUSTEE IN TRUST, WITH POWER OF SALE, that real property in the City of Roseville, County of PLACER, State of California, described as:

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A

APN: 496-100-034-000

TOGETHER WITH the rents, issues and profits thereof, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to the right, power and authority given to and conferred upon Beneficiary by Paragraph (10) of the provisions incorporated herein by reference to collect and apply such rents, issues and profits, for the purpose of securing payment of the indebtedness evidenced by a promissory note, of even date herewith, executed by Trustor in the sum of $2,220,327.84, any additional sums and interest thereon hereafter deferred by Beneficiary to the then record owner of said property which amounts are evidenced by a promissory note or notes, containing a recitation that this Deed of Trust secures the payment thereof, any lawful charge made by Beneficiary for a statement regarding the obligations secured hereby requested by or for Trustor, and the performance of each agreement herein contained. By the execution and delivery of this Deed of Trust and the note secured hereby, the provisions (1) to (15) inclusive, printed on pages 2 and 3 hereof, hereby are adopted and incorporated herein and made a part hereof as fully as though set forth herein at length; that he will observe and perform said provisions; and that the references to property, obligations, and parties in said provisions shall be construed to refer to the property, obligations, and parties set forth in this Deed of Trust.

Trustor request that a copy of any Notice of Default and a copy of any Notice of Sale hereunder be mailed to the address given herein.

______________________________________________
Trustor

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF....................................................................

On ..................................…….before me, ……..……………...………………………… personally appeared ..........................………………………….……. who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
.................................................................................................

Signature

TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, TRUSTOR AGREE S:

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

(1) To keep said property in good condition and repair; not to remove or demolish any building thereon; to complete or restore promptly and in good and workmanlike manner any building which may be constructed, damaged or destroyed thereon and to pay when due all claims for labor performed and materials furnished therefor; to comply with all laws affecting said property or requi ring any alterations or improvements to be made the reon; not to commit or permit waste thereof; not to commit, suffer or permit any act upon said property in violation of law; to cultivate, irrigate, fertilize, fumigate, prune and do all other acts which from the character or use of said property may be reasonably necessary, the specific enumerations herein not excluding the general. (2) To provide, maintain and deliver to Beneficiary fire insurance satisfactory to and with loss payable to Beneficiary. The amount collected under any fire or other insurance policy may be applied by Beneficiary upon indebtedness secured hereby and in such order as Beneficiary may determine, or at option of Beneficiary the entire amount so collected or any part thereof may be rel eased to Trustor. Such application or release shall not cure or waive any default or notice of default hereunder or invalida te any act done pursuant to such notice.
(3) To appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee; and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of evidence of title and attorney’s fees in a reaso nable sum, in any such action or proceeding in which Beneficiary or Trustee may appear, and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed.
(4) To pay: at least ten (10) days before delinquency all taxes and assessments affecting said property, including assessments on appurtenant water stock; when due, all encumbrances, charges and liens, any interest, on said property or any part thereof , which appear to be prior or superior hereto; all costs, fees and expenses of this Trust.

Should Trustor fail to make any payment or to do any act as herein provided, then Beneficiary or Trustee, but without obligation so to do and without notice to or demand upon Trustor and without releasing Trustor from any obligation hereof, may: make or do the same in such manner and to such extent as either may deem necessary to protect the security hereof, Beneficiary or Trustee being authorized to enter upon said property for such purposes; appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee; pay, purchase, contest or compromise any encumbrance, charge or lie n which in the judgment of either appears to be prior or superior hereto; and, in exercising any such powers, pay necessary expenses, employ counsel and pay his reasonable fees.
(5) To pay immediately and without demand all sums so expended by Beneficiary or Trustee, with interest from date of expenditure at the amount allowed by law in effect at the date hereof, and to pay for any statement provided for by law in ef fect at the date hereof regarding the obligation secured hereby any amount demanded by the Beneficiary not to exceed the maximum allowed by law at the time when said statement is demanded.
(6) That any award of damages in connection with any condemnation for public use of or injury to said property or any part thereof is hereby assigned and shall be paid to Beneficiary who may apply or release such moneys received by him in the same manner and with the same effect as above provided for disposition of proceeds of fire or other insurance. (7) That by accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive his right either to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure so to pay. (8) That at any time or from time to time, without liability therefore and without notice, upon written request of Beneficia ry and presentation of this Deed and said note for endorsement, and without affecting the personal liability of any person for pay ment of the indebtedness secured hereby, Trustee may: reconvey any part of said property; consent to the making of any map or plat t hereof; join in granting any easement thereon; or join in any extension agreement or any agreement subordinating the lien or charge hereof. (9) That upon written request of Beneficiary stating that all sums secured hereby have been paid, and upon surrender of this Deed and said note to Trustee for cancellation and retention and upon payment of its fees, Trustee shall reconvey, without warranty, the property then held hereunder. The recitals in such reconveyance of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. The grantee in such reconveyance may be described as “the person or persons legally entitled thereto.” Five (5) years after issuance of such full reconveyance, Trustee may destroy said note and this Deed (unless directed in such request to retain them). (10) That as additional security, Trustor hereby give to and confer upon Beneficiary the right, power and authority, during the continuance of these Trusts, to collect the rents, issues and profits of said property, reserving unto Trustor the right, prior to any default by Trustor in payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in performance of any agreement hereunder, to collect and retain such rents, issues and profits as they become due and payable. Upon any such default, Beneficiary may at any time without notice, either in person, by agent, or by a receiver to be appointed by a court, and without regard to the adequacy of any security for the indebtedness hereby secured, enter upon and take possession of said property or any part thereof, in his own name sue or otherwise collect such rents, issues and profits, including those past due and unpaid, and apply the same, less costs and expenses of operation and collection, including reasonable attorney’s fees, upon any indebtedness secured hereby, and in such order as Beneficiary may determine. The entering upon and taking possession of said property, the collection of such rents, issues and profits and the application thereof as afore said, shall not cure or waive any default or notice of default hereunder or invalidate any act done pursuant to such notice. (11) That upon default by Trustor in payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in performance of any agreement hereunder, Beneficiary may declare all sums secured hereby immediately due and payable by delivery to Trustee of written declaration of default and demand for sale and of written notice of default and of election to cause to be sold said property, which notice Trustee shall cause to be filed for record. Beneficiary also shall deposit with Trustee this Deed, said note and all documents evide ncing expenditures secured hereby.

After the lapse of such time as may then be required by law following the recordation of said notice of default, and notice of sale having been given as then required by law, Trustee, without demand on Trustor, shall sell said property at the time and pla ce fixed by it in said notice of sale, either as a whole or in separate parcels and in such order as it may determine at public auction to the highest

bidder for cash in lawful money of the United States, payable at time of sale. Trustee may postpone sale of all or any porti on of said property by public announcement at such time and place of sale, and from time to time thereafter may postpone such sale by public announcement at the time fixed by the preceding postponement. Trustee shall deliver to such purchaser its deed conveying the property so sold, but without any covenant or warranty, express or implied. The recitals in such deed of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. Any person, including Trustor, Trustee, or Beneficiary as hereinafter defined, may purcha se at such sale.

After deducting all costs, fees and expenses of Trustee and of this Trust, including cost of evidence of title in connection with sale, Trustee shall apply the proceeds of sale to payment of: all sums expended under the terms hereof, not then repaid, with accrued interest at the amount allowed by law in effect at the date hereof; all other sums then secured hereby; and the remainder, if any, to the person or persons legally entitled thereto.

In the event of foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure of prior security deed or assignment of the first mortgage to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, any provisions herein or any provisions in any other collateral agreement restricting the use of the property or otherwise restricting Trustor’s ability to sell the property shall have no further force or effect. A ny person (including his successors or assigns) receiving title to the property through a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure of a prior security deed shall receive title to the property free and clear from such restrictions. (12) Beneficiary, or any successor in ownership of any indebtedness secured hereby, may from time to time, by instrument in writing, substitute a successor or successors to any Trustee named herein or acting hereunder, which instrument, executed by the Beneficiary and duly acknowledged and recorded in the office of the recorder of the county or counties where said property is situated, shall be conclusive proof of proper substitution of such successor Trustee or Trustees, who shall, without conveyance fro m the Trustee predecessor, succeed to all its title, estate, rights, powers and duties. Said instrument must contain the name of the origi nal Trustor, Trustee and Beneficiary hereunder, the book and page where this Deed is recorded and the name and addres s of the new Trustee. (13) That this Deed applies to, inures to the benefit of, and binds all parties hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the owner and holder, including pledgees, of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. In this Deed, whenever the context so requires, the masculine gender includes the feminine and/or neuter, and the singular number includes the plural. (14) The Trustee accepts this Trust when this Deed, duly executed and acknowledged, is made a public record as provided by law. Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which Trustor, Beneficiary or Trustee shall be a party unless brought by Trustee. (15) Trustee shall act as Trustee under Deeds of Trust given solely for the purpose of securing obligations for the repayment of money other than corporate bonds. (California Financial Code §1590.)

REQUEST FOR RECONVEYANCE

THE PROMISSORY NOTE OR NOTES, AND ANY EVIDENCES OF FURTHER AND/OR ADDITIONAL ADVANCES MUST BE PRESENTED WITH THIS REQUEST.

……………………………………….California....................................................................... (date)
To THE TRUSTEE NAMED ON THE REVERSE HEREOF:

You are hereby authorized and requested to execute a reconveyance hereunder and deliver same to ………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………

The undersigned own all the obligations secured by said Deed of Trust:

_________________________________ ______________________________ Beneficiary Beneficiary
_________________________________ ______________________________ Beneficiary Beneficiary

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Real Property in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California, described as follows:

Add description from title report here

APN: