Agenda packet — Roseville City Council, October 2, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

AGENDA
October 2, 2024

CITY COUNCIL
6:00 p.m.

Council Chambers
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA
www.roseville.ca.us

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WELCOMES YOUR PARTICIPATION
If an agenda item is open to public comment, such public comment shall be addressed to the chair of the meeting.

Public Comment
- Speakers have three minutes under Public Comment to speak on issues that
are not listed on the agenda and are within the City's jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda.

Consent Calendar
- If applicable, the Consent Calendar consists of routine items that may be approved by one motion. Any person can remove an item from the Consent Calendar to be discussed separately.

Agenda Items
- Speakers have five minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.

Levine Act Provisions
-

The Levine Act requires a Party (or its agent (s)) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officers (including Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, and members of other City boards and commissions) totaling more than $250 within the 12 months before the City decision.

Americans with Disabilities Act
- Notify the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance if special assistance is required to participate in a meeting including the need of auxiliary aids or services.

Audio/Visual Presentations
- If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance.

Security procedures are in place to attend Roseville City Council meetings.

All attendees must
successfully pass through a security metal detector.

Any person with a prohibited item will not be
allowed entry.

Prohibited items include, but are not limited to: firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/ any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs and alcohol.

Roseville City Clerk 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 916-774-5200 TDD 916-774-5220

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. MEETING PROCEDURES

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

BEGINNING OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes

6.1. Minutes of Prior Meeting
Memo from City Clerk Technician Melissa Lipp and City Clerk Carmen Avalos recommending the City Council approve the minutes of the September 18, 2024 City Council Meeting.

CC #:
3573
File #:
0102-03
CONTACT:

Melissa Lipp 916-774-5268 [email protected]

Bids / Purchases / Services

6.2. 116 S. Grant Street Tenant Improvements Phase 2 - Purchase Order and Increase to Change Order Authority
Memo from Project Coordinator Lori
Crittenden and Public Works Director
Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-338 APPROVING AN INCREASE IN CHANGE ORDER
AUTHORITY.

Staff requests Council approve a purchase order with Friant and Associates, LLC for 116 S. Grant Street, in the amount of $598,307.76, for office furniture purchases, using a
competitively procured purchasing contract
through The Interlocal Purchasing System
. Staff also requests approval to
increase the change order authority on the Design-Assist Construction Agreement with Bullard, Inc. for the 116 S. Grant Street tenant improvements from 10% to 15%, an additional $242,751.15, in order to complete construction of the project. Funding for this work is included in the 116 S. Grant Street Building Improvements Project budget in the E
lectric Fund.

CC #:
3564
File #:
0203-13
CONTACT:

Lori Crittenden 916-774-5707 [email protected]

6.3. Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment
Memo from Alternative Transportation Manager Ed Scofield and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-335 APPROVING CONTRACT PURCHASE
AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 1, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND INNOVATE MOBILITY, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE (3003167).

Staff requests Council approve a first amendment to the contract purchase agreement with Innovate Mobility, LLC, to complete additional analysis as a part of Roseville Transit's Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA). The COA work is closely tied to critical components of the transit operations service provider Request for Proposal (RFP) being released next year. Staff's ability to use Innovate Mobility will ensure the COA recommendations are adequately outlined in the RFP process based on their detailed knowledge of all COA elements. Amendment No. 1 to the Innovate Mobility contract will add $30,000 to the not-to-exceed amount of $156,959.18, for an updated total contract of $186,959.18. Funding for the amendment would come from a Caltrans Sustainable Communities grant. Local Transportation Funds would provide the necessary match.

No General Fund resources will be used on this amendment. There is sufficient funding in the Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis Project budget.

CC #:
3561
File #:
0721
CONTACT:

Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]

Resolutions

6.4. Cost Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost Rate Proposal - Professional Services Agreement Amendment
Memo from Budget Manager Nancy Rothlisberger and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-333 APPROVING A SECOND

AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND MGT IMPACT SOLUTIONS,

LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve an amendment to the professional services agreement with MGT Impact Solutions, LLC, the City’s cost allocation plan and indirect cost rate proposal consultant.

The $33,720 cost of the amendment is included in existing FY2024-25 appropriations in the Finance Department budget in the General Fund.

CC #:
3557
File #:
0200
CONTACT:

N. Rothlisberger 916-774-5314 [email protected]

6.5. Occupational Health Services – Increase in Spending Authority Memo from Human Resources Technician Michele Fitzgerald and Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-339 APPROVING AN INCREASE IN SPENDING AUTHORITY. Staff requests Council approve an increase in spending authority for a professional services agreement for Occupational Health Services with Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions, Inc. that was initially approved by City Council on January 20, 2021. The estimated expenditures for these services will increase from $210,000 to up to $425,000 through the term of the contract in January 2026. The Human Resources Department and Fire Department budgets in the General Fund have funds to cover the increased costs within the current fiscal year budget.

CC #:
3565
File #:
0600-04
CONTACT:

Michele Fitzgerald 916-774-5217 [email protected]

6.6. Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees - Addition of Affordable Housing Project Fee Deferral Administrative Fee and Interest Rate
Memo from Economic Development Analyst Gina McColl and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-340 ADOPTING AN AMENDED SCHEDULE OF
USER AND REGULATORY FEES. Staff requests Council approve an update to the Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees to add an Administrative Fee and Interest Rate for Affordable Housing Projects related to Section 4.04.040 of Chapter 4.04 of Title of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding nonresidential development impact fee deferrals. Administrative processing fees will be charged on fee deferrals to cover the costs, resulting in no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Interest charged will result in no fiscal impact from fee deferrals on the development impact fee programs. The fee deferral program incentivizes affordable housing projects that bring additional construction jobs and helps the City achieve the job housing balance necessary to support the community.

CC #:
3566
File #:
0215
CONTACT:

Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]

6.7. Baseline Road - Segment 3 and a Portion of Segment 2 Project - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Andrew Druck and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-332 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS BASELINE ROAD – SEGMENT 3 AND A PORTION OF SEGMENT 2 PROJECT,
APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING

AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE
RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. Staff requests Council accept Baseline Road - Segment 3 and a Portion of Segment 2, CWJ # 190854, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
3556
File #:
0400-04-12-1
CONTACT:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

6.8. Zero Emissions Bus Depot Phase 1 Project - Notice of Completion Memo from Project Supervisor Andre Baranov and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-337 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE ZERO
EMISSIONS BUS DEPOT PHASE 1 PROJECT, APPROVING THE
“NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC

WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff request Council approve
the Zero Emissions Bus
Depot Phase 1 Project as complete. The project was funded with Local Transportation Funds, Electric Funds, Air Quality Mitigation Funds, Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Grant monies, Placer County Air Pollution Control District Grant monies, and American Rescue Plan Act monies. The original project budget approved as part of Ordinance 6533, including construction and soft costs, was increased from $4,906,000 through Ordinances 6653 and 6692 to a total of $5,202,054 to reflect available grant funding and additional scope of work. The project had no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

CC #:
3563
File #:
0721
CONTACT:

Andre Baranov 916-774-5342 [email protected]

6.9. Greater Sacramento Economic Council - Economic Development Agreement and Expenditure of Membership Funds for FY2024-25
Memo from Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-334

APPROVING AN

AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE

GREATER SACRAMENTO ECONOMIC COUNCIL, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and approve
the expenditure of membership funds for the
Greater Sacramento Economic Council in the amount of $61,171. The purpose of the membership with the Greater Sacramento Economic Council is to attract, grow, support, and expand industry, businesses, and jobs, assist small businesses and entrepreneurs and promote the City as a place to do business.

Funding for this membership was included in the Economic Development Department's FY2024-25 membership budget in the General Fund.

CC #:
3559
File #:
0106-01 & 0110
CONTACT:

Melissa Anguiano 916-774-5284 [email protected]

Ordinances (for introduction and first reading)

6.10. Roseville Municipal Code Amendment – Kennel Licenses Memo from Deputy City Attorney Travis Cochran and Animal Control Supervisor Sarah Cooper recommending the City Council introduce for first reading an

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AMENDING SECTIONS 7.20.010 AND 7.20.020 OF CHAPTER 7.20 OF TITLE 7 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
KENNEL LICENSES. Chapter 7.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code regulates kennel licenses within the City. A recent amendment to state law now requires submission of a natural disaster evacuation plan as a condition to receiving a kennel license. This ordinance will incorporate such requirement into the Roseville Municipal Code. The City has also received numerous requests to increase the number of dogs that may be kept at a property without a kennel license. This ordinance would allow up to four dogs on a single premises without a kennel license. There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed ordinance.

CC #:
3560
File #:
0323
CONTACT:

Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]

Reports / Requests

6.11. Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 1 Parcel F-30 - Parcel Map Memo from Associate Engineer Edward Winston and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council approve the Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 1 Parcel F-30 parcel map. Engineering has completed its review of the parcel map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 3 lots for future development. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

CC #:
3558
File #:
0400-07
CONTACT:

Edward Winston (916) 774-5432 [email protected]

Ceremonial Documents

6.12. Proclamation - Cybersecurity Month October 2024
Proclaim October 2024 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month in Roseville and officially support the National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, ‘Secure our World’, and the National Public Awareness Campaign, ‘Stop. Think. Connect.™’, and call upon all employees, residents and visitors of Roseville to become educated about cybersecurity and put that knowledge into practice to keep our connected community safe from cyber threats.

CC #:
3567
File #:0102-06
CONTACT:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

7. RESOLUTIONS

7.1. Retired Annuitant 180-Day Wait Period Exception
Memo from Human Resources Manager Macy Dippert and Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-336 RESOLUTION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE
180-DAY WAIT PERIOD GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 7522.56 AND 21224. Staff requests Council approve an exception to the 180-day wait period for public agencies to hire a retired annuitant as allowed by the California Public Employees' Retirement System and California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 and in compliance with California Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224. The request would allow recently retired Bryan Buchanan, Wastewater Utility Manager, to be rehired as an annuitant, without waiting the 180 days after the retirement waiting period. Mr. Buchanan would be brought back based on his specialized knowledge and skills needed to complete several complex, critical wastewater projects. Based on the 960-hour limit that a retired annuitant may work, the maximum fiscal impact is estimated to be $76,442.69. This can be absorbed in the current Environmental Utilities Department’s FY2024-25 budget in the Wastewater Operations Fund due to salary savings from vacant positions.

CC #:
3562
File #:
0600
CONTACT:

Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected]

8. PUBLIC HEARING

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
City Council, when considering the matter scheduled for hearing, will take the following actions:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

Open the Public Hearing
Presentation by Staff
Presentation by applicant or Appellant
Accept Public Testimony
Appellant or Applicant Rebuttal Period
Close the Public Hearing
City Council Comments and Questions
City Council Action

In the future, if you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on this agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues, which you, or someone else raised orally at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence received by the City on or before the hearing.

Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued as noted and posting of this agenda serves as notice of continuation.

8.1. Infill Parcel 198 (100 Stonehouse Court) WellSpace Health - Rezone Memo from Associate Planner Escarlet Mar and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council consider the WellSpace Health Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
and
adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for
first reading an ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. The Rezone will allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate on the site with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Application costs were borne by the applicant, and the project is required to pay all applicable impact fees. The project is not anticipated to result in negative impacts on the City’s General Fund. In fact, the beneficial reuse of the facility as a medical use is expected to have a positive fiscal impact to the City.

CC #:
3551
File #:
0400-02 & 0400-04-17-2
CONTACT:

Escarlet Mar 916-774-5247 [email protected]

8.2. WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing Project - Fee Deferrals and Government Financing Agreement
Memo from Economic Development Analyst Gina McColl and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-341 APPROVING FEE DEFERRALS FOR
THE WB-32 ROSEVILLE SENIOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT;
and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-342 APPROVING PARK
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRALS FOR THE WB-32
ROSEVILLE SENIOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT;
and adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 24-343 APPROVING A GOVERNMENT FINANCING

AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND
ROSEVILLE SENIOR AFFORDABLE 2 LP, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT AND ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO

EFFECTUATE ITS PURPOSE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE .

Staff requests Council approve an extended fee deferral in the amount of $2,220,328, a fee deferral of park development impact fees in the amount of $1,007,424, a Government Financing Agreement, and authorize the City Manager to execute it and all necessary documents on behalf of the City to effectuate its purpose for the WB-32 Roseville Senior Affordable Housing Project. The requested deferrals will not result in a negative impact to the City’s General Fund or the affected development impact fee programs. Administrative fees equivalent to staff’s time necessary to process and track the deferrals will be charged to each associated building permit and interest will be charged on all monies deferred.

CC #:
3568
File #:
0215
CONTACT:

Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]

9. COUNCIL REPORTS / PUBLIC COMMENTS

10. ADJOURNMENT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3573
File #:
0102-03
Title:

Minutes of Prior Meeting
Contact:

Melissa Lipp 916-774-5268 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Approve the minutes of the September 18, 2024 City Council Meeting.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
September 18, 2024

MINUTES
September 18, 2024

CITY COUNCIL
6:00 p.m.

Council Chambers
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA
www.roseville.ca.us

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Vice Mayor Krista Bernasconi, Councilmember Scott Alvord, Councilmember Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember Tracy Mendonsa, Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Roseville High School Students, Megan & Abby, led the Pledge of Allegiance.

4. MEETING PROCEDURES
City Clerk Carmen Avalos announced the procedures for addressing the City Council.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1. Resolution - Wild Bill's Tattoo
Commend Wild Bill's Tattoo for 50 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville, and extend wishes for continued success.

CONTACT:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

Vice Mayor Krista Bernasconi made the presentation to Bill Hill of Wild Bill's Tattoo, who responded.

Page 1 of 13 ends

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mike Simpson requested action on speeding on Oakridge Drive.

Kathleen Mirtoni announced a public meeting regarding the homeless.

Nick Bryant spoke on speeding in his apartment complex.

Adam (last name inaudible) spoke on management issues at Maidu Village Apartments.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR

BEGINNING OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Tracy Mendonsa, seconded by Pauline Roccucci, to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended. The Motion Passed.

Roll call vote:

Ayes: Alvord, Bernasconi, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci Minutes

7.1. Minutes of Prior Meeting
Memo from City Clerk Technician Melissa Lipp and City Clerk Carmen Avalos recommending the City Council approve the minutes of the September 4, 2024 City Council and Housing Authority Meeting.

CC #:
3555
File #:
0102-03
CONTACT:

Melissa Lipp [email protected] 916-774-5268

Bids / Purchases / Services

7.2. On-Call Electrical/Lighting Services - Contract Purchase Agreements Memo from Parks Manager Brian Castelluccio and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-327

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND VASKO ELECTRIC, INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3004140); and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-328

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ELITE SERVICES EXPERTS INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3004138). Staff requests Council approve contract purchase agreements for on-call Electrical/Lighting Services with Vasko Electric, Inc., and Elite Service Experts Inc. Staff also requests approval to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council

Page 2 of 13 ends

approval, and change order authority of 10%. The agreement with Vasko Electric, Inc. shall have a not-to-exceed cost for services of $150,000 in year one, and the agreement with Elite Service Experts Inc. shall have a not-to-exceed cost of $80,000 in year one. These services are funded from the Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department operating budget in the General Fund and applicable Community Facilities District and/or Lighting and Landscape Districts budgets.

CC #:
3550
File #:
0203-10
CONTACT:

Brian Castelluccio 916-746-1755 [email protected]

7.3. On-Call Exterior Lighting Maintenance and Repair (RFP 01-077) - Contract Purchase Agreements
Memo from Administrative Technician Darci Carpenter and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24- 321 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND VASKO ELECTRIC, INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-322

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BEAR ELECTRICAL
SOLUTIONS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve
service agreements with Bear Electrical Solutions Inc. and Vasko Electric Inc. for on-call exterior lighting maintenance and repair services. The $350,000 in funding for these contracts is included in the Facility Services Fund Building Maintenance budget for FY2024-25.

CC #:
3537
File #:
0203-04
CONTACT:

Darci Carpenter 916-774-5702 [email protected]

7.4. Fire Alarm & Sprinkler System Services (RFP 01-078) - Contract Purchase Agreement
Memo from
Administrative Technician Darci Carpenter
and Public Works Director
Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24- 323 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SIERRA BUILDING
SYSTEMS, INC., A LOW VOLTAGE INTEGRATOR, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3004085).

Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase
agreement with Sierra Building Systems Inc., a Low Voltage Integrator, to provide fire system services in the amount of $350,000. The agreement will provide the City with inspection, testing, maintenance, and repairs of fire systems on an as-needed basis at multiple locations.

Funding for the agreement is included in the FY2024-25 budget in the Facility Services Fund and Facility Rehabilitation Fund.

CC #:
3540
File #:
0203-04

Page 3 of 13 ends

CONTACT:

Darci Carpenter 916-774-5702 [email protected]

Resolutions

7.5. California Integrated Transit Project - Sacramento Area Council of Governments Subrecipient Agreement
Memo from Assistant Transportation Planner Zachary Presley and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-329 APPROVING A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH THE

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED FORMS AND AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE.

Staff requests Council approval of the
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
(
SACOG) subrecipient agreement for Roseville’s participation and implementation of the California Integrated Transit Project. The capital costs for this project have been assessed at $123,649.89 and are being funded via Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program funds distributed by SACOG. The initial three years of operating costs for this project have been assessed at $66,825.00 and are being funded through Local Transportation Funds. There is no impact to the General Fund.

CC #:
3552
File #:
0721
CONTACT:

Zach Presley 916-774-5365 [email protected]

7.6. Sierra Vista - Westbrook Boulevard Segment 4 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Andrew Druck and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24- 320 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA –
WESTBROOK BOULEVARD SEGMENT 4 PROJECT, APPROVING THE
"NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE

CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY

OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE

DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE
SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
3536
File #:
0400-04-12-01
CONTACT:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

7.7. Investment Advisory and Trust Administration Services - Professional Services Agreement Amendment
Memo from Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-325 APPROVING

AN AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT

Page 4 of 13 ends

LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
. Staff requests Council approve an
amendment to the professional services agreement with PFM Asset Management LLC (PFM) for managing the City's pension and other post-employment benefits trust investment portfolios. The amendment clarifies the calculation terminology for the fees under the professional services agreement.

The estimated cost of the investment
management services is unchanged with the amendment, at approximately $245,000 per year, with a fee cap of $220,000 for the first year. PFM fees are assessed based upon assets under management. There will be no fiscal impact to the General Fund from these agreements, as the fees will be paid directly by the trust accounts.

CC #:
3546
File #:
0200 & 0600-04
CONTACT:

Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]

Ordinances (for introduction and adoption - appropriation/urgency measures)

7.8. Water Utility Staffing Study Project - Non-Capital Multi-Year Project Approval, Professional Services Agreement, and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Water Utility Manager George Hanson and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-324 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BROWN AND

CALDWELL, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6870 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE

IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
.

Staff
requests Council approve a professional services agreement with Brown and Caldwell, Inc. for a Water Utility Staffing Study. In addition, staff is requesting approval of a budget adjustment to initiate a new Non-Capital Multi-Year Project, the Water Utility Staffing Study Project, with a budget of $96,489 from available
resources in the Water Operations Fund.

CC #:
3498
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

George Hanson 916-746-1764 [email protected]

7.9. Staffing Changes
Memo from Human Resources Manager Macy Dippert and Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6872 AMENDING ORDINANCE 6808, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR

PERSONNEL REPRESENTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL
BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1245, AS
AMENDED BY APPENDIX “I” TO BE EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 21,
2024, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE
6873

AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 6855, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “F” TO BE

EFFECTIVE
SEPTEMBER 21, 2024, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
. Staff requests

Page 5 of 13 ends

Council approve the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers A & B salary schedule reflecting the addition of an Electric Line General Foreperson (1152A/1152B) and Senior Electric Line Troubleshooter (1153A/1153B) classifications, and updates to the city allocation schedule that includes one (1) reclassification from Senior Electric Line Technician to Senior Electric Line Troubleshooter, addition of one (1) Electric Line General Foreperson position, and deletion of one (1) Senior Electric Line Technician position. S
taff also requests Council approve the Management A & B salary schedules (Appendix F) reflecting the addition of Utility Business Systems Administrator (1154A/1154B), deletion of the AMI Project Manager (1505A/1505B), and salary adjustment to Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief Operator (9040A/9040B), effective September 21, 2024.

These recommendations are part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing levels to provide a high level of service to the community.

For
the remainder of FY2024-25, the financial impact of the recommendations is to the Electric Fund is $29,900 and a cost savings of $9,658 for the Wastewater Operations Fund. All net budget increases can be absorbed in existing appropriations, so no budget adjustments are requested at this time.

CC #:
3545
File #:
0600-01
CONTACT:

Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected]

7.10. Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project – New Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Principal Engineer Janice Gainey and Environmental Utilities Director recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6865 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND

DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff
requests Council approve a new Capital
Improvement Project, the Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project, and approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $500,000. Funds will be reduced from the Cooperative Potable Water Transmission Infrastructure Project and re-appropriated to the Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project in the Water Construction Fund to break the original project into two projects. There is no impact to the fund balance in the Water Construction Fund.

CC #:
3532
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected]

7.11. Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Pond Levee Federal Emergency Management Agency Letter of Map Revision – Non-Capital Multi-Year Project Approval and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Wastewater Manager Tracie Mueller and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6867 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE.

Staff
requests Council approve a new Non-Capital Multi-Year Project, the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Pond Levee Federal Emergency Management

Page 6 of 13 ends

Agency Letter of Map Revision, and approve a budget adjustment of $200,000 from available resources in the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund.

CC #:
3538
File #:
0900-02-02-1 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

7.12. Vactor Washout Station Project - Budget Adjustment Memo from Wastewater Manager Tracie Mueller and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6868 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE.

Staff
requests Council approval of a $310,000 budget adjustment for the existing Vactor Washout Station Project using available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund and Water Rehabilitation Fund.

CC #:
3541
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

7.13. Wastewater Collections Easement Machine with Trailer and Utility Broom for Compact Track Loader – Budget Adjustment
Memo from Wastewater Manager Tracie Mueller and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6869 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE.

Staff
requests Council approval of a budget adjustment for $120,472.74 to fund the purchase of an easement machine with a trailer and a utility broom for an existing compact track loader to be used by Wastewater Collections to address planned and unplanned repair and rehabilitation work to existing infrastructure.

This adjustment
establishes the budget to purchase this equipment through the Fleet Replacement Fund.

CC #:
3542
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

7.14. Sewer Routing Alternatives Analysis Project – Non-Capital Multi-Year Project Approval and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Wastewater Manager Tracie Mueller and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6866 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff r
equests Council approve a new Non-Capital Multi-Year Project, the Sewer Routing Alternatives Analysis Project, and approve a budget adjustment of $50,000 from

Page 7 of 13 ends

available resources in the Wastewater Construction Fund.

CC #:
3535
File #:
0800-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected]

7.15. Woodcreek Golf Course Bunker Renovation Project – Budget Adjustment Memo from Parks, Recreation & Libraries Superintendent Rob Nakamura and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6871 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION

MEASURE
. Staff requests Council approve a budget adjustment to reduce the Woodcreek Golf Facility Renovation and Restoration project by $707,033 and re- appropriate the funds to the Woodcreek Golf Club Bunker Renovation project. Both projects are funded within the Golf Course Fund, with no impact on the General Fund.

CC #:
3544
File #:
0702-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Rob Nakamura 916 774 5135 [email protected]

Ordinances (for second reading and adoption)

7.16. Second Reading - Roseville Municipal Code Addition – Temporary Memorials ORDINANCE NO. 6874 ADDING CHAPTER 13.14 OF TITLE 13 OF THE

ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TEMPORARY MEMORIALS, for second reading and adoption.

CC #:
3549
File #:
0704
CONTACT:

Jill Geller 916-774-5249 [email protected]
My Tien Doan 916-774-5325 [email protected]

Reports / Requests

7.17. League of California Cities Annual Conference 2024 - Designation of Voting Delegate
Memo from Government Relations Administrator Mark Wolinski and Deputy City Manager Megan Scheid recommending the City Council appoint by motion, Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer, as the voting delegate and Scott Pettingell, Assistant Finance Director, as the alternate voting delegate to the League of California Cities business meeting of the General Assembly. The League of California Cities Annual Conference is being held October 16-18, 2024, in Long Beach, CA. The annual business meeting will be held on Friday, October 18, 2024, when the membership takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate. The cost for registration, lodging, and flight is approximately $1,650 per delegate and the funds were approved in the City’s fiscal

Page 8 of 13 ends

year 2024-25 General Fund budget.

CC #:
3534
File #:
0106-04
CONTACT:

Mark Wolinski 916-774-5179 [email protected]

7.18. FD-51 Neighborhood Park - Master Plan Approval
Memo from Park Planning and Development Manager Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council approve the FD-51 Neighborhood Park Master Plan. This 1.12-acre neighborhood park is located off of Earl Rush Dr. at Market St. in Sierra Vista. This park backs up to an open space/drainage area. The total budget for this park is $702,000. Funding for the park was approved in FY2023-24 for design and in FY2024-25 for construction, with the budget appropriated in the Sierra Vista Neighborhood Park Fund. Maintenance costs will be covered through the Sierra Vista Community Facilities District No. 2 (Public Services). There will be no General Fund impact.

CC #:
3539
File #:
0704-01
CONTACT:

Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

8. RESOLUTIONS

8.1. Renewable Energy - Transaction Confirmation and Credit Support Addendum Memo from Power Supply and Portfolio Administrator Petra Wallace and Electric Utility Director Dan Beans recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-330 APPROVING A TRANSACTION CONFIRMATION BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24- 331 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US) L.P., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve a transaction for renewable energy and an updated Credit Support Annex with Shell Energy North America, L.P..

The total cost of the transaction is $77,175,000, or approximately $7,350,000 annually. Funding will be included in future Electric Fund budgets (initially in FY2027-28) and will be contingent upon approval of the City Council.

CC #:
3553
File #:
0800-03
CONTACT:

Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected]

Power Supply and Portfolio Administrator Petra Wallace made the presentation to the City Council.

Page 9 of 13 ends

Assistant Electric Utility Director William Forsythe continued the presentation.

No public comment received.

Motion by Scott Alvord, seconded by Krista Bernasconi, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-330 APPROVING A TRANSACTION CONFIRMATION BETWEEN

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. The Motion Passed.

Roll call vote:

Ayes: Alvord, Bernasconi, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci

9. SPECIAL REQUESTS/REPORTS/PRESENTATION

9.1. Fiscal Year 2023-24 Third Quarter Report
Memo from Budget Manager Nancy Rothlisberger and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council approve the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Third Quarter Report that provides a summary of the City’s financial position from July 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024 for (1) the General Fund, (2) the enterprise operating funds, and (3) revenues in other selected funds. This item has no fiscal impact.

CC #:
3547
File #:
0200
CONTACT:

N. Rothlisberger 916-774-5314 [email protected]

Item 9.1 was erroneously listed as an action item; however it is only an informational item with no action being taken by the City Council.

Assistant Finance Director Scott Pettingell introduced Budget Manager Nancy Rothlisberger, who made the presentation to the City Council.

Assistant Finance Director Scott Pettingell continued the presentation.

No public comment received.

No action taken. For information only.

10. PUBLIC HEARING

10.1. Community Development Block Grant 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report

Page 10 of 13 ends

Memo from Housing Analyst Kristine Faelz and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 34- 319 APPROVING THE 2023 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE

AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2023 CAPER TO THE U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD).

Staff
requests Council approval of the City's Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the federal Community Development Block Grant Program, and authorization to submit the CAPER to the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. This item does not result in any impact to the City's General Fund.

CC #:
3533
File #:
0709-03
CONTACT:

Kristine Faelz 916-774-5451 [email protected]

Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt opened the public hearing at 6:47 p.m.

Housing Manager Trisha Isom introduced Housing Analyst Kristine Faelz, who made the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt closed the public hearing at 6:53 p.m.

Motion by Tracy Mendonsa, seconded by Pauline Roccucci, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 34-319 APPROVING THE 2023 CONSOLIDATED

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2023 CAPER TO
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD).

The Motion Passed.

Roll call vote:

Ayes: Alvord, Bernasconi, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci

10.2. Electric Pickle - Fee Deferral
Memo from Economic Development Analyst Gina McColl and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-326 APPROVING FEE DEFERRALS FOR THE
ELECTRIC PICKLE PROJECT. Staff requests Council approve a fee deferral for Electric Pickle, a restaurant and outdoor recreation (pickle ball) facility, in the amount of approximately $620,600, until final of building permit/building occupancy.

An annual interest rate of 1.35%, prorated based on the length of the deferral, will be charged on the monies deferred to cover the City's cost of loss of interest income on the fee deferral and an administrative processing fee of $ 981.59 is to
be charged to each building permit.

CC #:
3548

Page 11 of 13 ends

File #:
0215-07
CONTACT:

Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]

Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m.

Economic Development Analyst Gina McColl made the presentation to the City Council.

Applicant Jarod Taylor spoke in support of the item.

Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.

Motion by Tracy Mendonsa, seconded by Krista Bernasconi, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-326 APPROVING FEE DEFERRALS FOR THE ELECTRIC PICKLE PROJECT. The Motion Passed.

Roll call vote:

Ayes: Alvord, Bernasconi, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci

10.3. Infill Parcel 198 (100 Stonehouse Court) WellSpace Health - Rezone This item has been moved to the October 2, 2024 City Council Meeting.

CONTACT:

Escarlet Mar 916-774-5247 [email protected]

11. COUNCIL REPORTS / PUBLIC COMMENTS
Dillon Haps spoke on issues experienced at the Gathering Inn.

Richard Wukmir spoke on the cancellation of the election in Districts 1 and 3.

Northern California Power Agency

Meeting
- Councilmember Pauline
Roccucci reported.

Councilmember Pauline Roccucci reported on various community activities.

Councilmember Tracy Mendonsa reported on various community activities.

Councilmember Scott Alvord reported on various community activities.

Greater Sacramento Economic Council Meeting
- Vice Mayor Krista
Bernasconi reported on attendance.

Vice Mayor Krista Bernasconi reported on various community events.

Greater Sacramento Area Council of Government Meeting
- Mayor Bruce
Houdesheldt reported on attendance.

Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt reported on various community events.

Page 12 of 13 ends

12. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt adjourned the meeting at 7:27 p.m.

Page 13 of 13 ends

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3564
File #:
0203-13
Title:
116 S. Grant Street Tenant Improvements Phase 2 - Purchase Order and Increase to Change Order Authority
Contact:

Lori Crittenden 916-774-5707 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.2.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a purchase order with Friant and Associates, LLC for 116 S. Grant Street office furniture purchases, in the amount of $598,307.76.

Staff also requests that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve an increase to the change order authority for the Design-Assist Construction Agreement with Bullard, Inc. for the 116 S.

Grant Street tenant improvements from 10% to 15% in order to complete construction of the Project.

BACKGROUND
The 116 S. Grant Street building was acquired by the City in 2020 to support the future needs of Roseville Electric Utility’s growing operations and customer programs. The building provides the City’s utility customers with a one-stop shop where they can pay their bills and learn about exciting new programs, emerging technology, and rebates.

In order to provide furnishings for the Phase 2 Tenant Improvement, staff recommend utilizing a piggyback contract (The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) Contract #230301) with Friant and Associates, LLC, to furnish the tenant improvements currently under construction.

TIPS is a
national purchasing cooperative that offers access to competitively procured purchasing contracts.

The furnishings include systems, office, training, meeting room, and break room furniture for the third and fourth floors.

In addition, City Council awarded a Design-Assist Construction Agreement to Bullard, Inc. on December 20, 2023 in the amount of $4,855,023 and authorized staff to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% ($485,502.30) of the contract amount. The 10% change order authority has been expended due to unforeseen circumstances with increasing construction costs and additional services needed to complete construction. Therefore, staff is requesting an increase in change order authority from 10% to 15%, which is an increase of $242,751.15.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of the Design-Assist Construction Agreement with Bullard, Inc. was $4,855,023. With the requested increase in change order authority to 15% ($728,253.45), the total contract amount will be $5,583,276.45.

The total cost of the purchase order for furnishings is $598,307.76.

Funding for this work is included in the 116 S. Grant Street Building Improvements Project budget in the Electric Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The purchase of furniture for use in City facilities and increases in change order authority meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional City services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Lori Crittenden, Project Coordinator
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-338
RESOLUTION NO. 24-338

APPROVING AN INCREASE IN CHANGE ORDER AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, on December 20, 2023, the City Council awarded a Design-Assist Construction Agreement to Bullard, Inc. for the 116 S. Grant Street, Phase 2 Tenant Improvements Project (Project); and

WHEREAS, the original 10% change order authority has been expended due to unforeseen circumstances with increasing construction costs and additional services needed to complete construction; and

WHEREAS, staff is requesting that the City council approve an increase of 5% to the change order authority, for an additional $242,751.15 for the Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed 15% or $728,253.45.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3561
File #:
0721
Title:

Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment
Contact:

Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.3.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract purchase agreement amendment between with Innovate Mobility, LLC, to complete some additional analysis as a part of Roseville Transit's Comprehensive Operational Analysis.

BACKGROUND
On September 6, 2023, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with Innovate Mobility, LLC, to develop a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) for Roseville Transit. The purpose of the COA is to examine all aspects of Roseville Transit's existing service with the goal of seeking new and innovative ways to provide transit services to Roseville residents.

Roseville and Innovate Mobility executed an agreement following Council approval for a not-to- exceed amount of $156,959.18. As work continues on the COA, staff recognizes the importance of utilizing Innovate Mobility to assist with the development of the upcoming Roseville Transit Operations Service Provider RFP, which expires on June 30, 2025. The COA work is closely tied to critical components of the transit RFP. Staff's ability to use Innovate Mobility will ensure the COA recommendations are adequately outlined in the RFP process thanks to their detailed knowledge of all COA elements.

The additional scope of work for Innovate Mobility will include the integration of the COA redesigned transit network into the RFP scope of work, as well as RFP development support.

FISCAL IMPACT
Amendment No. 1 to the Innovate Mobility contract will add $30,000 to the not-to-exceed amount of $156,959.18, for an updated total contract of $186,959.18. Funding for the amendment would come from a Caltrans Sustainable Communities grant. Local Transportation Funds would provide the necessary match. No General Fund resources will be used on this amendment. There is sufficient funding in the
Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis Project budget to
cover the contract increase. All provisions of the existing Agreement remain unchanged and in force.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a contract purchase agreement amendment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-335
Contractor Signed Amendment
RESOLUTION NO. 24-335

APPROVING CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 1, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND INNOVATE MOBILITY, LLC, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment No. 1 (3003167) to assist in the development of an updated Request for Proposal for Roseville Transit Operations and Maintenance Services, between the City of Roseville and Innovate Mobility, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said amendment is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

/0/1/2/3/4/5/6/3/i255/8/9/4/6/10/5/11/12/i255/13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/16/17/17/16/18/19/20 /21/22/23/23/24/25/26/27/i255/29/26/30/31/25/24/32/33
/34/35/36/37/38/39/40 /41/39/39/35/42/38/43/44/45/35/46/47/48/47/43/40/49/49/34 /34/35/39/43/38/50/43/51/38/52/53/48/54/53/36/38/55
/56/57/57/55/44/58/58 /59/60/61/i255/63/55/44/58/43/35/39/i255/64/65/44/50/53/43/47/42/44/i255/66/55/i255/67/43/44/i255/60/59/68 /34/38/55/40/69/i255/70/34/i255/60/71/68/59/72
/21/22/73/74/25/30/i255/75/76/22/27/i255/27/26/32/23/76/77/32/26/i255/30/76/33 /34/35/36/37/38/39/40 /34/47/43/40/35/78/51/35/58/44/42/47/48/48/44 /34/35/39/43/38/50/43/79/35/38/39/39/38/80/53/81/55/35/37 /56/57/57/55/44/58/58 /63/53/55/50/52/38/58/47/39/82/i255/66/47/42/47/58/47/35/39 /72/59/59/i255/83/44/55/39/35/39/i255/67/43
/51/35/58/44/42/47/48/48/44/69/i255/34/56/i255/84/68/85/71/86 /63/52/35/39/44 /87/84/59/85/88/71/89/85/90/59/59/61/60 /91/38/65 /87/84/59/85/88/71/89/85/90/59/59/59/68
/64/90/36/38/47/48/79/80/53/81/55/35/37/92/55/35/58/44/42/47/48/48/44/93/50/38/93/53/58 /94/52/47/58/i255/34/35/39/43/55/38/50/43/i255/63/53/55/50/52/38/58/44/i255/56/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/i255/47/58/i255/58/44/39/43/i255/78/35/55/i255/40/35/53/55/i255/55/44/42/47/44/95/i255/38/39/57/i255/38/50/50/44/37/43/38/39/50/44/93/i255/i255/70/35/43/47/78/40/i255/43/52/44/i255/96/53/40/44/55/i255/42/47/38/i255/44/36/38/47/48/i255/35/78/i255/38/39/40/i255/39/44/44/57/44/57/i255 /50/52/38/39/82/44/58/i255/43/35/i255/43/52/44/i255/50/35/36/37/38/39/40/i255/39/38/36/44/69/i255/38/57/57/55/44/58/58/69/i255/38/39/57/i255/50/35/39/43/38/50/43/i255/47/39/78/35/55/36/38/43/47/35/39/93/i255/i255/94/52/44/i255/96/53/40/44/55/i255/95/47/48/48/i255/53/37/57/38/43/44/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/i255/37/55/47/35/55/i255/43/35/i255/40/35/53/i255 /58/47/82/39/47/39/82/i255/43/52/44/i255/57/35/50/53/36/44/39/43/93/i255/i255/i255 /51/44/43/53/55/39/i255/58/47/82/39/44/57/i255/50/35/37/47/44/58/i255/35/78/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/i255/43/35/i255/43/52/44/i255/96/53/40/44/55/i255/39/35/43/44/57/i255/35/39/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/93/i255/i255/56/48/43/44/55/38/43/47/35/39/58/i255/35/55/i255/36/35/57/47/78/47/50/38/43/47/35/39/58/i255/43/35/i255/43/52/44/i255 /38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/i255/38/55/44/i255/39/35/43/i255/38/48/48/35/95/44/57/93/i255/i255/98/37/35/39/i255/55/44/50/44/47/37/43/i255/35/78/i255/38/48/48/i255/39/44/50/44/58/58/38/55/40/i255/57/35/50/53/36/44/39/43/58/69/i255/43/52/44/i255/34/47/43/40/i255/95/47/48/48/i255/58/47/82/39/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/i255/38/39/57/i255/55/44/43/53/55/39/i255/38/i255 /78/53/48/48/40/i255/44/65/44/50/53/43/44/57/i255/50/35/37/40/i255/43/35/i255/40/35/53/93/i255/i255/51/44/50/44/47/37/43/i255/35/78/i255/43/52/44/i255/58/47/82/39/44/57/i255/50/35/37/40/i255/95/47/48/48/i255/46/44/i255/40/35/53/55/i255/39/35/43/47/50/44/i255/43/35/i255/37/55/35/50/44/44/57/i255/95/47/43/52/i255/43/52/44/i255/95/35/55/81/i255/47/39/i255/38/50/50/35/55/57/38/39/50/44/i255/95/47/43/52/i255 /43/52/44/i255/43/44/55/36/58/i255/38/39/57/i255/50/35/39/57/47/43/47/35/39/58/i255/35/78/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/93/i255/i255/99/35/55/81/i255/36/53/58/43/i255/39/35/43/i255/46/44/82/47/39/i255/53/39/43/47/48/i255/43/52/44/i255/50/35/39/43/55/38/50/43/i255/52/38/58/i255/46/44/44/39/i255/78/53/48/48/40/i255/44/65/44/50/53/43/44/57/93 /94/52/44/i255/78/35/48/48/35/95/47/39/82/i255/82/53/47/57/44/48/47/39/44/58/i255/36/53/58/43/i255/46/44/i255/78/35/48/48/35/95/44/57/i255/78/35/55/i255/43/52/44/i255/58/47/82/39/38/43/53/55/44/i255/46/48/35/50/81/i255/35/39/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/100 /101/1/102/12/i255/103/4/1/103/4/104/12/3/1/4/11/10/104/103/105 /106 /107/i255/1/108/2/12/4 /8/5/4/3/2/12/4/11/10/104/103/105 /13 /2/107/i255/14/12/2/12/4/5/102/i255/103/5/4/3/2/12/4 /0/1/4/103/1/4/5/3/104/1/2/105 /i255/109/108/1/i255/1/103/3/104/1/2/11/110/i255 /111/18/112/i255/56/i255/58/47/82/39/38/43/53/55/44/i255/78/55/35/36/i255/43/52/44/i255/63/55/44/58/47/57/44/39/43/i255/38/39/57/i255/43/52/44/i255/50/35/55/37/35/55/38/43/44/i255/58/44/38/48/113/i255/114/115/i255 /111/116/112/i255/80/39/44/i255/58/47/82/39/38/43/53/55/44/i255/78/55/35/36/i255/43/52/44/i255/34/52/38/47/55/36/38/39/i255/35/78/i255/43/52/44/i255/96/35/38/55/57/69/i255/63/55/44/58/47/57/44/39/43/69/i255/35/55/i255/38/39/40/i255/83/47/50/44/i255/63/55/44/58/47/57/44/39/43/i255/13/117/118/i255/35/39/44/i255/58/47/82/39/38/43/53/55/44/i255/78/55/35/36/i255 /43/52/44/i255/67/44/50/55/44/43/38/55/40/69/i255/38/39/40/i255/56/58/58/47/58/43/38/39/43/i255/67/44/50/55/44/43/38/55/40/69/i255/34/52/47/44/78/i255/91/47/39/38/39/50/47/38/48/i255/80/78/78/47/50/44/55/69/i255/35/55/i255/38/39/40/i255/94/55/44/38/58/53/55/44/55/i255/35/55/i255/56/58/58/47/58/43/38/39/43/i255/94/55/44/38/58/53/55/44/55/i255/35/78/i255/43/52/44/i255 /50/35/55/37/35/55/38/43/47/35/39/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /119/120/44/39/44/55/38/48/i255/45/38/39/38/82/44/55/69/i255/80/78/78/47/50/44/i255/45/38/39/38/82/44/55/i255/38/39/57/121/35/55/i255/67/38/48/44/58/i255/45/38/39/38/82/44/55/i255/38/55/44/i255/2/1/3/i255/50/35/55/37/35/55/38/43/44/i255/35/78/78/47/50/44/55/i255/43/47/43/48/44/58/93/i255/i255/94/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/i255/95/47/48/48/i255/46/44/i255 /55/44/122/44/50/43/44/57/i255/47/78/i255/39/35/43/i255/58/47/82/39/44/57/i255/47/39/i255/38/50/50/35/55/57/38/39/50/44/i255/95/47/43/52/i255/43/52/44/58/44/i255/82/53/47/57/44/48/47/39/44/58/93/i255/i255 /41/39/58/53/55/38/39/50/44/i255/55/44/123/53/47/55/44/36/44/39/43/58/100/i255/i255 /94/52/44/i255/34/47/43/40/124/58/i255/47/39/58/53/55/38/39/50/44/i255/55/44/123/53/47/55/44/36/44/39/43/58/i255/38/55/44/i255/55/44/78/44/55/44/39/50/44/57/i255/35/39/i255/56/43/43/38/50/52/36/44/39/43/i255/56/i255/35/78/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/93/i255/i255/96/40/i255/58/47/82/39/47/39/82/i255/43/52/44/i255/38/82/55/44/44/36/44/39/43/69/i255/40/35/53/i255 /38/55/44/i255/50/35/39/78/47/55/36/47/39/82/i255/43/52/38/43/i255/40/35/53/55/i255/50/35/36/37/38/39/40/i255/52/38/58/i255/43/52/44/i255/36/47/39/47/36/53/36/i255/47/39/58/53/55/38/39/50/44/i255/48/47/36/47/43/58/i255/55/44/123/53/47/55/44/57/93/i255 /125
/126/127/128/129/130/131/132/133/i255/135/133/136/137/138/127/139/137/i255/140/126/141/i255/142/143/142/135/126/143/144/145/146/147/148/149/150/146/151/152/152/147/146/149/153/152/152/146/153/126/153/154/151/143/145/142/148/145/155/142 /0/1/2/3/4/5/6/3/i255/8/9/4/6/10/5/11/12/i255/13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/16/17/17/16/18/19/20/i255 /13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/23/24/24/23/25/26/27 /13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/28/5/3/12 /29/26/30/31/32/33/30/29/24/29/23 /0/10/5/2/14/12/i255/34/4/35/12/4 /23
/0/10/5/2/14/12/i255/34/4/35/12/4/i255/28/5/3/12 /25/24/30/36/37/38/30/29/24/29/39 /40/12/41/42/11/42/1/2 /25
/13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/13/15/1/9/2/3 /25/43/26/44/45/46/45/47/25/43/i255/32/36/48 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/49/2/41/1/42/6/12/i255/50/1 /51/52/53/54/i255/55/56/i255/57/55/58/59/60/52/61/61/59 /62/63/63/55/64/65/53/58/i255/38/66/54/66/67/61/59/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /23/25/25/i255/68/59/69/65/55/65/i255/36/53
/57/70/36/37/68/71/33/33/37/i255/51/62/i255/45/46/26/27/43 /72/9/73/73/74/42/12/4 /71/65/65/55/60/66/53/59/i255/75/55/67/52/61/52/53/54/i255/33/33/51 /18/76/17/i255/8/4/12/11/3/1/2/i255/77/78/12/6/9/3/42/41/12/i255/28/4/i255/72/3/12/i255/76/18/79 /0/5/4/80/81/i255/82/0/i255/76/20/79/18/16
/38/83/55/65/59/84
/85/66/86/84
/37/87/66/52/61/84
/88/89/18/19/90/i255/20/20/91/92/79/91/93/93
/88/89/18/19/90/i255/20/93/91/92/16/20/89/19
/5/6/6/1/9/2/3/11/73/5/80/5/94/74/12/95/4/1/11/12/41/42/74/74/12/96/6/5/96/9/11 /38/83/55/65/59/84
/85/66/86/84
/37/87/66/52/61/84
/88/20/18/91/90/i255/93/93/19/92/89/79/93/17
/88/90/i255
/4/5/10/9/74/95/42/2/2/1/41/5/3/12/15/1/94/42/74/42/3/80/96/6/1/15 /28/12/11/6/4/42/73/3/42/1/2/i255/1/97/i255
/98/5/94/1/4/81/i255
/12/99/9/42/73/15/12/2/3/i255
/5/2/35/100/1/4/i255/15/5/3/12/4/42/5/74/11
/13/15/12/2/35/15/12/2/3/101/i255/18
/0/1/2/3/4/5/6/3/i255/73/9/4/6/10/5/11/12/i255/5/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/2/9/15/94/12/4/i255/16/17/17/16/18/19/20/81/i255/102/10/42/6/10/i255/102/5/11/i255/12/78/12/6/9/3/12/35/i255/1/2/i255/89/100/19/100/76/16/81/i255/42/11/i255 /10/12/4/12/94/80/i255/15/1/35/42/97/42/12/35/i255/3/1/i255/42/2/6/4/12/5/11/12/i255/3/10/12/i255/3/1/3/5/74/i255/6/1/11/3/i255/1/97/i255/11/12/4/41/42/6/12/i255/97/4/1/15/i255/103/18/79/19/81/89/79/89/96/18/93/i255/3/1/i255/103/18/93/19/81/89/79/89/96/18/93/96/i255 /50/10/12/i255/73/9/4/73/1/11/12/i255/1/97/i255/3/10/42/11/i255/15/1/35/42/97/42/6/5/3/42/1/2/i255/42/11/i255/3/1/i255/5/35/35/i255/3/1/i255/3/10/12/i255/11/6/1/73/12/i255/1/97/i255/102/1/4/104/i255/3/1/i255/42/2/6/74/9/35/12/i255/11/12/4/41/42/6/12/11/i255/3/1/i255 /5/11/11/42/11/3/i255/40/1/11/12/41/42/74/74/12/i255/42/2/i255/3/10/12/i255/35/12/41/12/74/1/73/15/12/2/3/i255/1/97/i255/5/2/i255/9/73/35/5/3/12/35/i255/40/105/8/i255/97/1/4/i255/40/1/11/12/41/42/74/74/12/i255/50/4/5/2/11/42/3/i255/34/73/12/4/5/3/42/1/2/11/i255 /5/2/35/i255/106/5/42/2/3/12/2/5/2/6/12/i255/11/12/4/41/42/6/12/11/i255/42/2/i255/5/6/6/1/4/35/5/2/6/12/i255/102/42/3/10/i255/3/10/12/i255/5/3/3/5/6/10/12/35/i255/107/49/2/2/1/41/5/3/12/i255/106/1/94/42/74/42/3/80/i255 /13/15/12/2/35/15/12/2/3/i255/101/18/i255/72/6/1/73/12/107/i255/35/5/3/12/35/i255/89/100/79/100/76/91/96/i255/13/74/74/i255/1/3/10/12/4/i255/73/4/1/41/42/11/42/1/2/11/i255/1/97/i255/3/10/12/i255/13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/11/10/5/74/74/i255/4/12/15/5/42/2/i255 /9/2/6/10/5/2/14/12/35/i255/5/2/35/i255/42/2/i255/97/9/74/74/i255/97/1/4/6/12/i255/5/2/35/i255/12/97/97/12/6/3/96 /72/50/13/40/50/i255/28/13/50/77/108/i255/77/78/12/6/9/3/12/35/i255/13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3 /77/82/28/i255/28/13/50/77/108/i255/109/73/1/2/i255/8/5/80/15/12/2/3/i255/1/97/i255/105/42/2/5/74/i255/49/2/41/1/42/6/12 /8/74/12/5/11/12/i255/6/1/2/3/5/6/3/i255/110/5/6/10/i255/8/4/12/11/74/12/80/i255/42/2/i255/3/10/12/i255/8/9/94/74/42/6/i255/111/1/4/104/11/i255/13/74/3/12/4/2/5/3/42/41/12/i255/50/4/5/2/11/73/1/4/3/5/3/42/1/2/i255/28/42/41/42/11/42/1/2/i255/5/3/i255 /88/89/18/19/90/20/91/19/92/18/16/76/17/i255/1/4/i255/112/73/4/12/11/74/12/80/95/4/1/11/12/41/42/74/74/12/96/6/5/96/9/11/i255/97/1/4/i255/99/9/12/11/3/42/1/2/11/i255/4/12/14/5/4/35/42/2/14/i255/3/10/42/11/i255/5/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/96/i255 /i255
/0/9/11/3/1/15/12/4/i255/101/72/9/73/73/74/42/12/4/101 /8/5/80/15/12/2/3/50/12/4/15/11/105/4/12/42/14/10/3/50/12/4/15/11 /105/34/113 /72/10/42/73/73/42/2/14/106/12/3/10/1/35 /25/46/27/23/23/114 /59/53/i255/23/24/85 /69/59/52/115/83/53/i255/55/65/i255/116/55/66/69/117/i255/66/53/i255/53/83/59/i255/117/59/58/53/52/65/66/53/52/55/65/48/59/58/53/52/65/66/53/52/55/65/116 /59/58/53/i255/75/59/53/83/55/117 /72/3/5/4/3/i255/28/5/3/12 /77/2/35/i255/28/5/3/12 /0/1/2/97/42/4/15/i255/50/1 /31/55/66/65/65/66/i255/70/64/118/69/55/119/i255/i255/8/10/1/2/12/i255/25/30/45/25/26/30/27/39/26/30/25/25/24/29 /13/3/3/12/2/3/42/1/2/108/i255/50/1/3/5/74/i255/0/1/11/3/i255/2/1/3/i255/3/1/i255/12/78/6/12/12/35/i255/3/10/12/i255/5/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/5/15/1/9/2/3/i255/102/42/3/10/1/9/3/i255/73/4/42/1/4/i255/5/73/73/4/1/41/5/74/i255/1/97/i255/3/10/12/i255/8/9/4/6/10/5/11/42/2/14/i255/1/97/97/42/6/12/96 /i255
/i255
/i255
/120
/121/122/123/124/125/126/127/128/i255/130/128/131/132/133/122/134/132/i255/135/121/136/i255/137/138/137/130/121/138/139/140/141/142/143/144/145/141/146/147/147/142/141/144/148/147/147/141/148/121/148/149/146/138/140/137/143/140/150/137 /0/1/2/3/4/5/6/3/i255/8/9/4/6/10/5/11/12/i255/13/14/4/12/12/15/12/2/3/i255/i255/16/17/17/16/18/19/20 /21/22/23/23/24/25/26/27
/28/29/14/2/5/3/9/4/12/30/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31 /8/4/29/2/3/i255/33/5/15/12/30/31/31/34/35/36/37/38/i255/40/37/41/35/42/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/i255 /43/29/3/44/12/30/31/31/45/42/46/47/48/49/46/50/51/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31 /52/5/3/12/30/i255/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31 /21/22/23/23/24/25/26/27
/28/29/14/2/5/3/9/4/12/30/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31 /8/4/29/2/3/i255/33/5/15/12/30/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/i255 /43/29/3/44/12/30/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31 /52/5/3/12/53/i255/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31 /54/25/55/56/i255/57/58/i255/59/57/60/26/61/25/24/24/26/62/i255/63/i255/64/22/65/25/66/25/23/67/24/i255/54/57/27/23/57/27/67/55/25/57/65 /28/29/14/2/5/3/9/4/12/30/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/i255 /8/4/29/2/3/i255/33/5/15/12/30/i255/68/57/69/25/65/25/66/70/i255/54/67/60/26/56 /43/29/3/44/12/30/i255/54/25/55/56/i255/64/67/65/67/71/26/27/i255 /52/5/3/12/30/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31/31 /72
/73/74/75/76/77/78/79/80/i255/82/80/83/84/85/74/86/84/i255/87/73/88/i255/89/90/89/82/73/90/91/92/93/94/95/96/97/93/98/99/99/94/93/96/100/99/99/93/100/73/100/101/98/90/92/89/95/92/102/89 /103/104/105/106/104/107/106/107/108

/0/1/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/8/2/9/10/11/10/5/12/i255/13/14/6/1/15/14/6/1/5/i255/16/17/i255/18/19/2/20/6/i255 /21/22/23/22/24/25/i255
/i255
/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/i255/36/37/32/29/37/38/32/39/40/i255 /41/42/i255/43/44/45/46/i255/47/48/i255/46/49/50/i255/47/51/52/47/53/51/52/i255/54/47/42/50/55/53/56/56/50/i255/57/45/44/51/42/53/46/i255/58/47/59/43/45/50/49/50/51/42/53/55/50/i255/60/43/50/45/44/46/53/47/51/44/56/i255/41/51/44/56/61/42/53/42/i255/62/58/60/41/63/64/i255/65/49/53/66/49/i255/53/51/66/56/67/68/50/42/i255/44/i255 /66/47/59/43/45/50/49/50/51/42/53/55/50/i255/45/50/68/50/42/53/52/51/i255/47/48/i255/46/49/50/i255/66/53/46/61/69/42/i255/46/45/44/51/42/53/46/i255/45/47/67/46/50/i255/51/50/46/65/47/45/70/64/i255/71/51/51/47/55/44/46/50/i255/72/47/73/53/56/53/46/61/i255/62/71/72/63/i255/49/44/42/i255/73/50/50/51/i255/44/42/70/50/68/i255/46/47/i255 /50/74/46/50/51/68/i255/46/49/50/53/45/i255/65/47/45/70/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/46/49/50/i255/58/60/41/i255/46/47/i255/44/42/42/53/42/46/i255/54/47/42/50/55/53/56/56/50/i255/53/51/i255/46/49/50/i255/68/50/55/50/56/47/43/59/50/51/46/i255/47/48/i255/44/51/i255/67/43/68/44/46/50/68/i255/54/75/76/i255/48/47/45/i255/54/47/42/50/55/53/56/56/50/i255 /57/45/44/51/42/53/46/i255/60/43/50/45/44/46/53/47/51/42/i255/44/51/68/i255/72/44/53/51/46/50/51/44/51/66/50/i255/62/60/77/72/63/i255/42/50/45/55/53/66/50/42/78/i255/57/49/50/i255/66/67/45/45/50/51/46/i255/60/77/72/i255/66/47/51/46/45/44/66/46/i255/50/74/43/53/45/50/42/i255/79/67/51/50/i255/80/81/64/i255/82/81/82/83/78/i255 /57/49/50/i255/58/60/41/i255/65/47/45/70/64/i255/50/51/66/47/59/43/44/42/42/53/51/52/i255/45/47/67/46/50/i255/49/47/67/45/42/64/i255/42/50/45/55/53/66/50/i255/66/47/55/50/45/44/52/50/64/i255/44/51/68/i255/59/53/56/50/44/52/50/64/i255/53/42/i255/66/45/67/66/53/44/56/i255/48/47/45/i255/42/49/44/43/53/51/52/i255/46/49/50/i255/51/50/65/i255 /60/77/72/i255/66/47/51/46/45/44/66/46/i255/44/51/68/i255/44/56/53/52/51/42/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/46/49/50/i255/66/53/46/61/69/42/i255/48/67/46/67/45/50/i255/46/45/44/51/42/53/46/i255/47/73/84/50/66/46/53/55/50/42/78/i255/i255 /i255
/57/49/50/i255/42/66/47/43/50/i255/47/48/i255/65/47/45/70/i255/65/53/56/56/i255/53/51/66/56/67/68/50/i255/46/49/50/i255/48/47/56/56/47/65/53/51/52/85/i255 /i255
/86/78/i255/88/89/34/32/90/29/91/34/38/30/89/i255/30/92/i255/93/32/94/32/95/38/90/89/32/94/i255/96/29/91/89/95/38/34/i255/97/32/34/39/30/29/98/i255/38/89/34/30/i255/34/99/32/i255/100/33/30/101/32/i255/30/92/i255/102/30/29/98/40/i255 /i255
/103/i255/71/72/i255/65/53/56/56/i255/56/50/55/50/45/44/52/50/i255/46/49/50/i255/58/60/41/i255/65/47/45/70/i255/46/47/i255/53/51/66/47/45/43/47/45/44/46/50/i255/46/49/50/i255/45/50/68/50/42/53/52/51/50/68/i255/51/50/46/65/47/45/70/i255/53/51/46/47/i255/46/49/50/i255/54/75/76/69/42/i255/104/66/47/43/50/i255 /47/48/i255/105/47/45/70/64/i255/50/51/42/67/45/53/51/52/i255/46/49/44/46/i255/45/47/67/46/50/i255/49/47/67/45/42/64/i255/42/50/45/55/53/66/50/i255/43/44/46/46/50/45/51/42/64/i255/59/53/56/50/44/52/50/64/i255/44/51/68/i255/47/43/50/45/44/46/53/47/51/44/56/i255/68/50/46/44/53/56/42/i255/44/45/50/i255 /66/56/50/44/45/56/61/i255/68/50/48/53/51/50/68/78/i255 /103/i255/76/45/47/55/53/68/50/i255/67/43/68/44/46/50/68/i255/42/43/50/66/53/48/53/66/44/46/53/47/51/42/i255/46/49/44/46/i255/45/50/48/56/50/66/46/i255/46/49/50/i255/47/43/46/53/59/53/106/50/68/i255/45/47/67/46/50/i255/68/50/42/53/52/51/64/i255/44/56/56/47/65/53/51/52/i255/43/45/47/43/47/42/50/45/42/i255 /46/47/i255/44/56/53/52/51/i255/46/49/50/53/45/i255/73/53/68/42/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/46/49/50/i255/66/53/46/61/69/42/i255/50/74/43/50/66/46/44/46/53/47/51/42/i255/44/51/68/i255/55/53/42/53/47/51/78/i255 /i255
/82/78/i255/93/107/28/i255/108/32/37/32/109/30/101/110/32/89/34/i255/100/111/101/101/30/29/34/i255/39/38/34/99/i255/112/89/99/91/89/33/32/94/i255/28/111/113/109/38/33/i255/107/32/32/94/113/91/33/98/i255/88/89/34/32/90/29/91/34/38/30/89/40/i255 /i255
/103/i255/114/51/42/67/45/50/i255/46/49/50/i255/60/77/72/i255/54/75/76/i255/45/50/48/56/50/66/46/42/i255/70/50/61/i255/43/67/73/56/53/66/i255/42/50/51/46/53/59/50/51/46/i255/45/50/52/44/45/68/53/51/52/i255/46/49/50/i255/45/50/68/50/42/53/52/51/50/68/i255/46/45/44/51/42/53/46/i255 /51/50/46/65/47/45/70/64/i255/52/53/55/53/51/52/i255/73/53/68/68/50/45/42/i255/44/i255/66/47/59/43/45/50/49/50/51/42/53/55/50/i255/67/51/68/50/45/42/46/44/51/68/53/51/52/i255/47/48/i255/66/47/59/59/67/51/53/46/61/i255/43/45/53/47/45/53/46/53/50/42/64/i255/66/47/51/66/50/45/51/42/64/i255 /44/51/68/i255/43/45/50/48/50/45/50/51/66/50/42/64/i255/46/49/67/42/i255/43/45/47/59/47/46/53/51/52/i255/43/45/47/43/47/42/44/56/42/i255/46/49/44/46/i255/44/56/53/52/51/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/66/53/46/61/i255/44/51/68/i255/43/67/73/56/53/66/i255/50/74/43/50/66/46/44/46/53/47/51/42/78/i255 /i255
/80/78/i255/115/30/110/101/29/32/99/32/89/95/38/37/32/i255/28/29/30/33/111/29/32/110/32/89/34/i255/28/29/30/33/32/95/95/i255/116/95/95/38/95/34/91/89/33/32/40/i255 /i255
/103/i255/60/48/48/50/45/i255/52/67/53/68/44/51/66/50/i255/68/67/45/53/51/52/i255/46/49/50/i255/47/43/50/51/i255/54/75/76/i255/42/47/56/53/66/53/46/44/46/53/47/51/i255/43/50/45/53/47/68/64/i255/44/42/42/53/42/46/53/51/52/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/45/50/42/43/47/51/42/50/42/i255/46/47/i255/43/45/47/43/47/42/50/45/i255 /53/51/117/67/53/45/53/50/42/i255/44/51/68/i255/66/56/44/45/53/48/53/66/44/46/53/47/51/42/64/i255/43/44/45/46/53/66/67/56/44/45/56/61/i255/66/47/51/66/50/45/51/53/51/52/i255/46/49/50/i255/45/50/68/50/42/53/52/51/50/68/i255/51/50/46/65/47/45/70/i255/44/51/68/i255/42/50/45/55/53/66/50/i255 /42/43/50/66/53/48/53/66/44/46/53/47/51/42/78/i255
/103/i255/104/67/43/43/47/45/46/i255/46/49/50/i255/50/55/44/56/67/44/46/53/47/51/i255/44/51/68/i255/42/50/56/50/66/46/53/47/51/i255/43/45/47/66/50/42/42/64/i255/50/51/42/67/45/53/51/52/i255/46/49/44/46/i255/44/56/56/i255/43/45/47/43/47/42/44/56/42/i255/44/45/50/i255/66/47/51/42/53/42/46/50/51/46/i255/65/53/46/49/i255 /73/47/46/49/i255/46/49/50/i255/47/43/50/45/44/46/53/47/51/44/56/i255/47/73/84/50/66/46/53/55/50/42/i255/47/48/i255/46/49/50/i255/58/60/41/78/i255 /i255
/108/32/109/38/37/32/29/91/113/109/32/95/40/i255
/i255
/103/i255/54/50/55/53/42/50/68/i255/104/66/47/43/50/i255/47/48/i255/105/47/45/70/i255/68/47/66/67/59/50/51/46/i255/53/51/66/47/45/43/47/45/44/46/53/51/52/i255/46/49/50/i255/45/50/68/50/42/53/52/51/50/68/i255/46/45/44/51/42/53/46/i255/51/50/46/65/47/45/70/i255/44/51/68/i255/66/47/59/59/67/51/53/46/61/i255 /48/50/50/68/73/44/66/70/78/i255
/103/i255/41/42/42/53/42/46/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/46/49/50/i255/68/45/44/48/46/i255/44/51/68/i255/48/53/51/44/56/i255/55/50/45/42/53/47/51/42/i255/47/48/i255/46/49/50/i255/60/77/72/i255/54/75/76/i255/46/44/53/56/47/45/50/68/i255/46/47/i255/46/49/50/i255/67/43/68/44/46/50/68/i255/46/45/44/51/42/53/46/i255/51/50/46/65/47/45/70/78/i255 /103/i255/41/42/42/53/42/46/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/44/51/42/65/50/45/53/51/52/i255/117/67/50/42/46/53/47/51/42/i255/45/50/66/50/53/55/50/68/i255/68/67/45/53/51/52/i255/46/49/50/i255/60/77/72/i255/54/75/76/i255/43/45/50/118/73/53/68/i255/43/50/45/53/47/68/78/i255 /103/i255/41/42/42/53/42/46/i255/65/53/46/49/i255/68/50/55/50/56/47/43/53/51/52/i255/46/49/50/i255/48/53/51/44/56/i255/60/77/72/i255/54/75/76/i255/46/47/i255/50/51/42/67/45/50/i255/53/46/i255/45/50/48/56/50/66/46/42/i255/46/49/50/i255/44/43/43/45/47/55/50/68/i255/58/60/41/78/i255 /i255
/119/120/121/122/123/124/125/126/i255/128/126/129/130/131/120/132/130/i255/133/119/134/i255/135/136/135/128/119/136/137/138/139/140/141/142/143/139/144/145/145/140/139/142/146/145/145/139/146/119/146/147/144/136/138/135/141/138/148/135 /0/1/2/3
/4/5/6/3/7/8/9/6/10/1/5/i255/1/12/i255
/0/3/13/3/14/10/7/5/3/13/i255/15/8/9/5/14/10/6/i255
/16/3/6/17/1/8/18/i255/19/20/1/21/8/14/22
/0/23/24/i255/25/3/26/3/2/1/27/28/3/5/6/i255
/29/21/27/27/1/8/6/i255/19/20/1/21/8/14/22
/24/8/1/30/21/8/3/28/3/5/6/i255
/24/8/1/30/3/14/14/i255/31/14/14/10/14/6/9/5/30/3/i255
/19/20/1/21/8/14/22
/4/5/30/1/8/27/1/8/9/6/10/1/5/i255/1/12/i255
/24/21/32/2/10/30/i255/23/3/3/13/32/9/30/18/i255
/19/20/1/21/8/14/22
/15/1/6/9/2/i255/20/1/21/8/14/20/1/21/8/2/33/i255/0/9/6/3/15/1/6/9/2/i255/34/1/14/6/i255/19/35/22 /36/37/38/39/40/i255/42/39/43/37/44/45 /46/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/45 /47/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/47 /48/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/47 /49/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/50 /47/50/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/51 /50/52/53/54/55/56/51 /50/53/57/45/47/56/54/56/48 /58/59/i255/60/44/61/62/38/63/50 /49/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/50 /47/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/50 /56/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/53/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/49 /52/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/51 /53/47/54/52/49/51 /49/57/50/49/56/54/50/53 /64/43/37/44/i255/65/40/66/37/44/67/68/50 /55/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/50 /45/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/50 /50/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/53/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/49 /48/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/51 /48/52/54/49/56/51 /49/57/50/45/53/54/46/45 /69/44/37/66/70/40/i255/58/68/71/63/71 /51/47/57/49/56/56/54/56/56 /69/68/63/37/40/51 /45/56/57/56/56/56/54/56/56
/72/73/74/75/76/77/78/79/i255/81/79/82/83/84/73/85/83/i255/86/72/87/i255/88/89/88/81/72/89/90/91/92/93/94/95/96/92/97/98/98/93/92/95/99/98/98/92/99/72/99/100/97/89/91/88/94/91/101/88

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3557
File #:
0200
Title:

Cost Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost Rate Proposal - Professional Services Agreement Amendment
Contact:

N. Rothlisberger 916-774-5314 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.4.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the second amendment to the professional services agreement with MGT Impact Solutions, LLC, and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
The City contracts with a financial consultant to create an annual Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) and a series of Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICRPs). The CAP allocates the City’s indirect costs and ensures that the General Fund recovers its costs for services that benefit non-General Fund groups including enterprise funds and internal service funds. The ICRPs are used to charge indirect costs to capital improvement projects, external agencies, and others.

The City has a current professional services agreement (PSA) with MGT Impact Solutions, LLC to create these reports. For the FY2024-25 ICRP rates, the City is requesting five more rates (at a cost of $2,925) than are included in the original PSA. This is to ensure that all City groups that charge projects can appropriately recover their overhead costs.

Staff also recommends exercising its option to extend the term of the PSA for an additional year for $33,720. This includes the higher cost of the ICRPs going forward.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as the $36,645 cost of this amendment is already budgeted in the Finance Department’s FY2024-25 appropriations in the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Amending a professional services agreement mee ts the above criteria
and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

Respectfully Submitted,
Nancy Rothlisberger, Budget Manager
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-333
MGT Impact Solutions (Second Amendment)
RESOLUTION NO. 24-333

APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT,

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND MGT IMPACT SOLUTIONS, LLC,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Second Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for a Cost Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost Rate Proposal, by and between the City of Roseville and MGT Impact Solutions, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P006\00089260.DOCX:09/06/2024]

SECOND AMENDMENT TO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Cost Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost Rate Proposal
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 10th day of September, 2024, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and MGT Impact Solutions, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, formerly known as MGT of America Consulting, LLC (“CONSULTANT”); and W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT previously entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated October 6, 2021, and amended on February 21, 2024 (“Agreement”) consisting of preparation of a cost allocation plan and indirect cost rate proposal (“Project”); and WHEREAS, CITY wishes to increase the total compensation for the initial term and exercise an optional renewal year of the Agreement in order to compensate CONSULTANT for additional services as described in CONSULTANT’s letters/proposals dated August 7, 2024 and September 6, 2024, which are attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference; and
WH
EREAS, CONSULTANT is willing and able to provide such additional services.

NO
W, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P006\00089260.DOCX:09/06/2024] 1 . Section 3 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY shall pay two thousand nine hundred twenty-five dollars ($2,925), in consideration of the additional services as set forth in Exhibit “A” to the Second Amendment to Agreement. This brings the total not to exceed contract amount to ninety- nine thousand fifteen dollars ($99,015) for the initial term.”

2. Section 1 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY is exercising its option to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional one (1) year period commencing on October 6, 2024 and ending on October 05, 2025.”

3. Section 3 of the Agreement is further amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY shall pay an additional thirty-three thousand, seven hundred twenty dollars ($33,720) in consideration of the additional services as set forth in Exhibit “B” to the Second Amendment to Agreement. This brings the total not to exceed contract amount to one hundred thirty-two thousand, seven hundred thirty-five dollars ($132,735) for the term through this Second Amendment to Agreement.”

4. The Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph for compliance with AB334 to read as follows:
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P006\00089260.DOCX:09/06/2024] “22 . Public Contracts: Conflicts of Interest. CONSULTANT’s duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting CITY with any portion of the CITY’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with CITY. CITY shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.” 5 . The Agreement is further amended by adding an additional paragraph regarding compliance with the Levine Act:
“2 3 . The Levine Act Disclosure. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to CITY elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the CITY decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by CONSULTANT and/or its agent(s), CONSULTANT is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.” [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P006\00089260.DOCX:09/06/2024]

6. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force an
d effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Second Amendment to Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ___________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Second Amendment to Agreement to be executed.

CI
TY OF ROSEVILLE, a
municipal corporation
BY
: _______________________________

DOMINICK CASEY
City Manager
ATTES
T:

MGT IMPACT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company
BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
and
BY: _N/A_____________________
its: _______________________________
BY
: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APP
ROVED AS TO FORM:

BY
: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
(S

IGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
CEO

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P006\00089260.DOCX:09/06/2024] APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

DENNIS KAUFFMAN
Chief Financial Officer/
Assistant City Manager

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P006\00089260.DOCX:09/06/2024]

EXHIBIT “A”

4320 West Kennedy Blvd. | Tampa, FL 33609 | 813.321.1400 | mgtconsulting.com August 7, 2024
Nancy Rothlisberger
Budget Manager
City of Roseville, CA
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
RE: CITY OF ROSEVILL E COST PLAN PROJECT FY 2023-2024 ADDITIONAL

DEPARTMENTAL ICRPS
Dear Nancy:

This letter is regarding the City’s Cost Allocation Project based on actual FY 2024 data. The current contract includes Indirect Rate calculations for up to twenty departments. Per the City’s request, we added five departmental rate calculations for the following cost centers:
 Public Affairs and Communications 18001
 PW Facilities Maintenance-Custodial Services 62510
 PW Facilities Maintenance-Building Maintenance 62520
 PW Facilities Maintenance-Facility Rehabilitation 62530  PW Traffic Signals 62201, 62210, 62230, 62240, 62250
MGT and the City staff spent additional time on these rate calculations. The tasks for the ICRP calculation are below:
 Meetings with City staff to identify needs, use of rates, and address any questions.  Review Citywide expenditure data and summarize total direct costs.  Prepare and update the ICRP template with personnel and expenditure data.  Provide the Draft ICRPs.
 Revise the ICRPs as needed.
 Finalize the rates.

The efforts related to the additional ICRPs is an additional fee of $2,925. If you have questions, please contact Ms. Parul Patel at 714.272.3461 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Patrick J. Dyer, Vice President
Authorized to Bind the Firm

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P006\00089260.DOCX:09/06/2024]

EXHIBIT “B”

(916) 760-4121x1003 | 4320 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, FL 33609 mgt.us

September 6, 2024
Nancy Rothlisberger, Budget Manager
City of Roseville, CA
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
RE: CITY OF ROSEVILLE COST PLAN PROJECT-RFP#10-22 CONTRACT RENEWAL Dear Nancy:

This letter is regarding the City’s request to renew cost plan services with MGT per the original signed contract in response to RFP#10-22. The current contract allows for renewal at the City’s option. The current contract includes Indirect Rate calculations for up to twenty departments. Per the City’s request for additional departmental rate calculations, MGT is providing pricing for up to ten additional departmental rates.

The tasks for the ICRP calculation are below:
 Meetings with City staff to identify needs, use of rates, and address any questions.  Review Citywide expenditure data and summarize total direct costs.  Prepare and update the ICRP template with personnel and expenditure data.  Provide the Draft ICRPs.
 Revise the ICRPs as needed.
 Finalize the rates.

The efforts related to the additional departmental ICRPs is an additional fee of $5,850.

If you have questions, please contact Ms. Parul Patel at 714.272.3461 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Patrick J. Dyer, Vice President
Authorized to Bind the Firm
Project Deliverables Renewal Year 1 FY 2024-25 Full and 2 CFR Part 200 Cost Allocation Plans, Departmental ICRP’s (up to 20) $27,870 Additional Departmental ICRP’s (up to 10) $5,850 Total Fees $33,720

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3565
File #:
0600-04
Title:

Occupational Health Services – Increase in Spending Authority Contact:

Michele Fitzgerald 916-774-5217 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.5.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve an increase in spending authority for a Professional Services Agreement for Occupational Health Services with Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions, Inc. from $210,000 to up to $425,000 through the contract expiration on January 16, 2026.

BACKGROUND
On January 20, 2021, City Council approved a citywide Professional Services Agreement with Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions, Inc. for occupational health services. These services include fitness for duty examinations, treatment of injuries covered by the City's self-insured workers' compensation program, pre-employment physicals, ergonomic evaluations, annual blood draw for Police, hearing conservation testing, DOT physicals, pulmonary fitness testing as well as utilization by Fire for annual physicals for (primarily) operational/sworn staff. The requirements vary by individual (age/gender), risk/exposure, and other medically appropriate criteria for the position.

This can include many services such as office visits – fire physicals, immunizations, radiology, specialty tests, wellness examination and services, as well as drug and alcohol testing as needed.

Due to the conditions surrounding the pandemic, as well as an increase in the number of services needed that weren't anticipated (e.g., increased pre-employment testing, workers' compensation claims, COVID-19 testing, etc.), City Council authorized an increase in expenditure authority to $210,000 annually on October 19, 2022. This is a citywide agreement for services that applies to all departments.

On August 7, 2024, Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions informed the City they were exercising the 3% escalator clause as agreed upon in the original contract. Although the contract provided the escalator clause was to be implemented in 2021, it was never implemented over the last three years. Instead of implementing a 9% catch up, Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions proceeded with a 6% pricing increase effective July 1, 2024. As of July 2024, $182,347 has been spent on the agreement, and for the remainder of this calendar year, staff anticipates spending up to $115,000. For calendar year 2025, staff anticipates spending up to $335,000, due to expanded preventative services being utilized and with the Fire Department projected shift from Kaiser to Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions, Inc. for the services described above. To ensure adequate spending authority through the term of the contract, staff is requesting spending authority up to $425,000.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended increase in spending authority from $210,000 to $425,000, for the Mobile- Med Work Health Solutions, Inc. professional services agreement can be covered by the current fiscal year Human Resources Department and Fire Department budgets in the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed increase to spending authority meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Michele Fitzgerald, Human Resources Technician
Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-339
RESOLUTION NO. 24-339

APPROVING AN INCREASE IN SPENDING AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, on January 20, 2021, the City Council approved a city-wide professional services agreement with Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions, Inc. for occupational health services; and

WHEREAS, due to the conditions surrounding the pandemic as well as an increase in the number of services needed that weren't anticipated (e.g., increased pre-employment testing, workers' compensation claims, COVID-19 testing, etc.) City Council authorized an increase in expenditure authority to $210,000 annually on October 19, 2022; and

WHEREAS, on August 7, 2024, Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions informed the City they were exercising the 3% escalator clause as agreed upon in the original contract; and

WHEREAS, due to expanded preventative services being utilized, staff is requesting that the City Council approve an increase to $425,000 annually.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the annual spending authority for occupational health services with Mobile-Med Work Health Solutions, Inc. to $425,000 is approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3566
File #:
0215
Title:

Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees - Addition of Affordable Housing Project Fee Deferral Administrative Fee and Interest Rate
Contact:

Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.6.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve an update to the Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees to add an Administrative Fee and Interest Rate for Affordable Housing Projects related to

Section 4.04.040 of Chapter 4.04 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding nonresidential development impact fee deferrals.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville’s Economic Development Department oversees the fee deferral programs as an incentive to encourage residential and nonresidential development. The fee deferral programs traditionally allowed for deferral of certain City-controlled development impact fees to building permit final or certificate of occupancy. Since the inception of the fee deferral programs, the City has processed dozens of requests that have helped facilitate development and stimulated economic growth.

However, due to the City’s ongoing pressures of meeting the state mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) requirements and the increasing challenges developers face in securing funding for affordable housing projects, an amendment to the Municipal Code was approved by Council, on June 19, 2024, allowing the extended deferral of certain City-controlled development impact fees for affordable housing projects. The amended ordinance allows for affordable housing projects to defer qualifying fees for a maximum of one year past issuance of a certificate of occupancy or three years past issuance of the first building permit, whichever is earlier.

At the time of adoption of the approved amendments to the Municipal Code to allow extended deferrals, it was acknowledged that staff would return to Council with proposed administrative fees. Staff has since evaluated the time and costs associated with an extended fee deferral and is proposing a new fee to cover the additional staff time required to administer, process and track these projects. Accordingly, the administrative fee would increase from $953 to $1,500 and the interest rate charged on these deferrals would adjust from the City's 10-year average pooled interest rate (approximately 1.35%) to a current market rate. Staff developed these fees based on real-time tracking of time to prepare the required agreements and coordination with various departments. The increased fee also accounts for anticipated tracking beyond a typical fee deferral.

FISCAL IMPACT
The administration of the extended fee deferral program will result in an increase in staff time.

However, administrative processing fees will be charged to cover these costs, resulting in no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Interest charged will result in no fiscal impact from fee deferrals on the development impact fee programs. In addition, the proposal incentivizes affordable housing projects that bring additional construction jobs and helps the City achieve the job housing balance necessary to support the community.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world.

Goal D - Enhance economic vitality

Respectfully Submitted,
Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-340
Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees (redline)
RESOLUTION NO. 24-340

ADOPTING AN AMENDED SCHEDULE OF USER AND REGULATORY FEES

WHEREAS, user and regulatory fees are established by the City Council; and

WHEREAS, due to the City’s ongoing pressures of meeting the state mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) requirements and the increasing challenges developers face in securing funding for affordable housing projects, an amendment to the Roseville Municipal Code was approved by Council, on June 19, 2024, allowing the extended deferral of certain City- controlled development impact fees for affordable housing project; and

WHEREAS, the amendment allows for affordable housing projects to defer qualifying fees for a maximum of one year past issuance of a certificate of occupancy or three years past issuance of the first building permit, whichever is earlier; and

WHEREAS, staff has since evaluated the time and costs associated with an extended fee deferral and is proposing a new fee to cover the additional staff time required to administer, process and track these projects.

WHEREAS, staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the amended Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the amended Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees is hereby adopted; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these fees are incorporated into the City’s current master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

Development Impact Fee Deferral and SCIP Fees

Fee Description

FY 24-25 Fee

Unit

Note
Y'rly
In'fltr
1 Development Impact Fee Deferral
a) Residential $340 per deferral Y
b) Non-Residential
i) Administrative Fee $953 per deferral Y
ii) Interest Charge on Deferred Fees

c) Affordable Housing Project

i) Administrative Fee
ii) Interest Charge on Deferred Fees
equal to unearned
interest based on
City's 10-yr avg
pooled interest rate

$1,500
Market Rate

per deferral

per deferral
per deferral
[a]

[a]
N

N
N

[a] Fee deferral will result in a loss of interest income on monies deferred over the construction timeframe. The interest ch arge is intended to cover these costs.

25 City of Roseville
Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3556
File #:
0400-04-12-1
Title:

Baseline Road - Segment 3 and a Portion of Segment 2 Project - Notice of Completion
Contact:

Andrew Druck 916-223-7577 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.7.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Baseline Road - Segment 3 and a Portion of Segment 2, CWJ # 190854, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City Specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Andrew Druck, Senior Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-332
NOC
Exhibit A - Location Map
Final Map

RESOLUTION NO. 24-332

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS BASELINE ROAD – SEGMENT 3 AND A PORTION OF SEGMENT 2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE " NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE

CITY OF ROSEVIL LE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Baseline Road – Segment 3 and a portion of segment 2 is hereby approved, and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Baseline Marketplace DF Properties, Inc. recorded in Book GG of Maps, Page 59, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Sierra Vista – Westbrook Boulevard Segment 4

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3563
File #:
0721
Title:

Zero Emissions Bus Depot Phase 1 Project - Notice of Completion Contact:

Andre Baranov 916-774-5342 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.8.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Zero Emissions Bus Depot Phase 1 Project as complete and adopt a resolution to authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The California Air Resources Board adopted the Innovative Clean Transit (ICT) rule in December 2018. The ICT rule requires all public transit agencies to gradually transition to a 100 percent zero-emission bus (ZEB) fleet. In consideration of the ICT, the City Council approved the Roseville Transit Zero-Emission Business Plan on May 20, 2020. The Zero Emissions Bus Depot Project was identified in the ZEB Plan as a needed project to accommodate the five electric buses approved for purchase by the City Council on August 4, 2021, and future electrification of the transit fleet.

The ZEB Depot was constructed in the center of the City's corporation yard where the 45 light duty vehicle stalls adjacent to the lawn area were converted to 30 bus stalls and 72 new light duty parking stalls. As part of Phase 1 of the project, charging equipment was installed at nine of the bus stalls and 10 of the light duty stalls.

The work has been deemed complete and acceptable by
the Psomas Engineering Construction Management team and City staff.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was funded with Local Transportation Funds, Electric Funds, Air Quality Mitigation Funds, Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Grant monies, Placer County Air Pollution Control District Grant monies, and American Rescue Plan Act monies. The original project budget approved as part of Ordinance 6533, including construction and soft costs, was increased from $4,906,000 through Ordinances 6653 and 6692 to a total of $5,202,054 to reflect available grant funding and additional scope of work. The project had no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Zero Emissions Bus Depot Project was evaluated in a previous Notice of Exemption (NOE), approved by the City Council. The current action requests the close out of the construction contract. The project was constructed as anticipated by the NOE. Therefore, the NOE still applies to this action, and no additional CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Andre Baranov, Project Supervisor
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-337
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-337

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE ZERO EMISSIONS BUS DEPOT PHASE 1 PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND

AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the Zero Emissions Bus Depot Phase 1 Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Public Works Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _____________________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City o
f Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

S
tate of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
C
ity of Roseville
St
ate of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of , 20__ _,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________ ________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3559
File #:
0106-01 & 0110
Title:

Greater Sacramento Economic Council - Economic Development Agreement and Expenditure of Membership Funds for FY2024-25
Contact:

Melissa Anguiano 916-774-5284 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.9.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Adopt a resolution to approve an Economic Development Agreement between the Greater Sacramento Economic Council and the City of Roseville and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City; and
2 .

Authorize the expenditure of membership funds for the Greater Sacramento Economic Council in the amount of $61,171.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville allocated financial support, in the form of membership, to the Greater Sacramento Economic Council (GSEC) within the Economic Development Department FY2024- 25 budget. The purpose of a membership with the Greater Sacramento Economic Council is to attract, grow, support, and expand industry, businesses, and jobs, assist small businesses and entrepreneurs and promote the City as a place to do business. Below is a description of the benefits and goals.

Greater Sacramento Economic Council

The Greater Sacramento Economic Council (GSEC) is a public-private partnership and serves as the region’s economic development organization. GSEC is led by chief executives from some of the region’s largest corporations and operates in partnership with local government to drive economic growth throughout the six-county region. GSEC is primarily funded through the private sector with a collaboration between local and state governments, market leaders, influencers, and stakeholders.

The proposed 2024-25 Economic Development Agreement with the GSEC is the City's tenth annual agreement for participation. The City's membership dues are based on 2023
population at
a $0.40 per capita rate applied to the population as reported by the State of California Department of Finance. Along with the City's support and participation in GSEC’s efforts, the City has single voting representation, by the City's Mayor or designee, on the Greater Sacramento Board of Directors.

The attached Economic Development Agreement outlines the services GSEC provides and the role it will play as the City’s partner to continue attracting new jobs and fostering prosperity that benefits the residents and businesses of Roseville. The City's continued investment in GSEC is vital to our successful partnership and efforts related to regional economic development efforts focused on business recruitment, retention, expansion, support of small businesses and entrepreneurs, and tourism. Attached is GSEC's 2023-24 Annual Report for additional information.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total dollar value of this request is $61,171 and is funded by the General Fund. These funds are included in the FY2024-25 Economic Development Department budget. Therefore, no additional General Fund resources are requested.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonable foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15061(b)(3)) and §15378. Approval of the FY2024-25 Economic Development Agreement and Expenditure of Membership Funds for GSEC meet the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance Economic Vitality

Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-334
Fiscal Year 2024-25 GSEC Economic Development Agreement GSEC 2023-24 Annual Report
RESOLUTION NO. 24-334

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

THE GREATER SACRAMENTO ECONOMIC COUNCIL, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an Economic Development Agreement between the Greater Sacramento Economic Council and the City of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE GREATER SACRAMENTO ECONOMIC COUNCIL

AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
This Economic Development Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City of Roseville, a California municipality (the “Public Jurisdiction”), and the Greater Sacramento Area Economic Council (“ Greater Sacramento ”), a California non -profit corporation (each a “ Party” and collectively referred to as the “ Parties”). The Agreement shall be effective (“ Effective Date”) upon signature of both Parties.

WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge and agree that any previous contract relating to the subject matter herein is terminated and replaced with this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the Public Jurisdiction and Greater Sacramento agree as follows:

I. RESPONSIBILITIES OF GREATER SACRAMENTO
A. MISSION: Greater Sacramento is an economic development organization working through a public-private partnership of local businesses and governments to retain, attract, grow, and create sustainable businesses in the six -county Sacramento Region, including El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties and the 23 cities therein.

B. GOALS: Greater Sacramento is guided by and strategically focused on the following specific long-range goals:

1. Develop and utilize in -depth data and analytics to guide strategic economic development efforts and improve the region’s competitive position.

2. Strategically market the region to generate qualified company prospects in targeted economic clusters.

3. Leverage public and private partners and resources to locate qualified prospects.

C. RETENTION AND EXPANSION POLICY:

1. Greater Sacramento’s primary role is developing the Sacramento Region’s market intelligence strategy for high -wage, base industry clusters in coordination with representatives of local communities.

2. Both Parties understand that retention and expansion of existing businesses within communities is primarily a local issue, but Greater Sacramento will confidentially assist local leaders on these projects.

3. Greater Sacramento will support communities’ efforts to retain and expand existing businesses through coordinating regional support and providing research on key retention and expansion projects, as requested by the local community.

4. Greater Sacramento will advise communities when an existing company contacts Greater Sacramento regarding a retention or expansion issue, subject to any legal and/or contractual non-disclosure obligations.

2 D. ACTION PLANS: In accordance with the Mission, Goals, and Retention and Expansion Policy set forth above and subject to the availability of adequate funding, Greater Sacramento shall implement strategic action plans adopted by its Board of Directors and Economic Develo pment Directors Taskforce (EDDT). The Public Jurisdiction shall be entitled to provide input on these action plans through its participation in these advisory groups as specified in Sections III.A. and III.B. of this Agreement. The Public Jurisdiction acknowledges and agrees that Greater Sacramento may, in its reasonable judgment in accordance with its own practices and procedures, substitute, change, reschedule, cancel, or defer certain activities as required by a result of changing market con ditions, funding availability, or other circumstances beyond Greater Sacramento’s reasonable control.

E. PERFORMANCE TARGETS : Specific performance targets shall be established by Greater Sacramento’s Board of Directors and shall be used to evaluate and report progress on Greater Sacramento’s implementation of strategic action plans. Greater Sacramento will provide regular repo rts to the Public Jurisdiction detailing its progress in implementing such plans. As required by a result of changing market conditions, funding availability, or other circumstances beyond Greater Sacramento’s reasonable control, these p erformance targets may be revised with the approval of the Board of Directors or a majority of the designated members of Greater Sacramento’s EDDT.

F. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORS TASKFORCE (EDDT) : Greater Sacramento will organize and lead the Economic Development Directors Taskforce (EDDT), which will develop and follow set protocol for issues such as: business attraction, retention, and expansion; external marketing and communications; and perm itting streamlining. The Public Jurisdiction may appoint one representative to the taskforce as outlined in Section III.B. of this Agreement.

II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PUBLIC JURISDICTION
A. STAFF SUPPORT OF GREATER SACRAMENTO’S EFFORTS: The Public Jurisdiction shall provide staff support to Greater Sacramento’s economic development efforts as follows:

1. The Public Jurisdiction shall respond to leads or prospects referred by Greater Sacramento in a professional manner within the time frame specified by the lead or prospect if the Public Jurisdiction desires to compete and if the lead is appropriate for the Public Jurisdiction. When possible, the Public Jurisdiction agrees to provide its response in the format developed jointly by Greater Sacramento and the EDDT.

2. The Public Jurisdiction shall provide appropriate local hospitality, tours, and briefings for prospects visiting sites in the Public Jurisdiction.

3. The Public Jurisdiction shall provide an official economic development representative to represent the Public Jurisdiction on the EDDT, which advises Greater Sacramento’s President & CEO.

4. The Public Jurisdiction shall cooperate in the implementation of Greater Sacramento/EDDT process improvement recommendations including presentation formats, exchange of information on prospects with Greater Sacramento staff, use

3 of shared data systems, land and building databases, and private sector real estate industry interfaces.

5. The Public Jurisdiction shall use its best efforts to respond to special requests by Greater Sacramento for specific information about the Public Jurisdiction within the time frame specified in such request.

6. In order to enable Greater Sacramento to be more sensitive and responsive to the Public Jurisdiction’s requirements, the Public Jurisdiction shall, at its sole option, deliver to Greater Sacramento copies of any economic development strategies approved by the Public Jurisdiction, work plans, programs, and evaluation criteria.

Greater Sacramento shall not disclose the information to outside parties.

7. The Public Jurisdiction shall use its best efforts to cause an economic development professional representing the Public Jurisdiction to attend all marketing events and other functions to which the Public Jurisdiction has committed itself.

8. The Public Jurisdiction agrees to work with Greater Sacramento to improve the Public Jurisdiction’s competitiveness and market readiness to support the growth and expansion of targeted industries.

B. RECOGNITION OF GREATER SACRAMENTO: The Public Jurisdiction agrees to recognize Greater Sacramento as the Public Jurisdiction’s officially designated regional economic development organization.

III. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES
A. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPRESENTATION: The Public Jurisdiction shall have a single voting representative on the Greater Sacramento Board of Directors so long as such Director will not cause Greater Sacramento to exceed the maximum number of authorized Directors. The Director under this paragra ph shall be the highest -ranking non -elected official with the Public Jurisdiction. This highest -ranking non-elected official shall be permitted to delegate his or her position as Director to the highest-ranking elected official with the Public Jurisdiction to serve as an alternate to the Director, provided, however, that (a) in the case that the Public Jurisdiction is a county, the highest -ranking elected official may be any one of the county supervisors and need not be the chair of the county supervisors, and (b) in the case that the Public Jurisdiction is a city with a mayor elected by and from the city council members (and not a mayor that is elected as mayor by the voters), the highest -ranking elected official may be any one of the city councilmembers and need not be the then-current rotating mayor. Any such Director (the representative or his or her alternate) will be qualified to serve on the Board of Directors only if the Public Jurisdiction remains current on its annual contribution at an amount equal to or greater than its full formula allocation as determined from time to time by the Board of Directors and laid out in this contract in Section III.E.1., and as long as the Public Jurisdiction makes a long-term comm itment to assist and carry out the mission and purpose of Greater Sacramento and fulfills the additional requirements set forth in this Agreement.

B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORS TASKFORCE (EDDT)
REPRESENTATION: The Public Jurisdiction shall also appoint one (1) economic development professional from its staff, local economic development partner organization, or other qualified community member, subject to the approval of Greater Sacramento, to

4 represent the Public Jurisdiction on Greater Sacramento’s Economic Development Directors Taskforce (EDDT), which advises Greater Sacramento’s President & CEO.

C. PARTICIPATION IN MARKETING EVENTS: Representative(s) of the Public Jurisdiction shall be entitled to participate in Greater Sacramento’s marketing events provided that such participation shall not be at Greater Sacramento’s expense.

D. PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE: When requested and appropriate, Greater Sacramento will use its best efforts to provide assistance and support to the Public Jurisdiction’s economic development staff for business location prospects identified and qualified by the Public Jurisdiction and assist the Public Jurisdiction with presentations to prospects in the Public Jurisdiction or corporate locations.

E. COMPENSATION:

1. The Public Jurisdiction agrees to pay $61,171 for services to be provided by Greater Sacramento pursuant to the Agreement during the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2025, as set forth in this Agreement. This amount is based on $0.40 per capita applied to the Public Jurisdiction’s population as reported in the 202 3 population estimates from the California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit, which listed the Public Jurisdiction as having a population of 152,928. Any adjustment to this formula shall be reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors and presented in writing to the Public Jurisdiction for approval.

2. Nothing herein shall preclude the Public Jurisdiction from contracting separately with Greater Sacramento for services to be provided in addition to those to be provided hereunder, upon terms and conditions to be negotiated by the Public Jurisdiction and Greater Sacramento.

3. Greater Sacramento shall submit annual invoices to the Public Jurisdiction on or before July 1 each year. To allow the Public Jurisdiction to budget appropriately, Greater Sacramento shall submit to the Public Jurisdiction a letter indicating the rate structure and full contribution amount no later than May 1 each year. The Public Jurisdiction shall submit full payment within the first quarter of its fiscal year beginning July 1. The Public Jurisdiction is entitled to receive annual audit reports for Greate r Sacramento and financial reports at Board of Directors meetings held at least four (4) times per year.

F. COOPERATION:

1. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the regional economic development program that Greater Sacramento agrees to undertake, the support that the Public Jurisdiction agrees to provide, the respective roles of Greater Sacramento and the Public Juris diction, and the payments of the Public Jurisdiction to Greater Sacramento for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025.

2. The parties acknowledge that Greater Sacramento is a cooperative organization effort between Greater Sacramento and local communities. Accordingly, the Public Jurisdiction and Greater Sacramento covenant and agree to work together in a productive and harmo nious manner, to cooperate in furthering Greater Sacramento’s goals for the 2024/2025 fiscal year.

5 3. The Public Jurisdiction agrees to work with Greater Sacramento, as necessary or appropriate, to revise the performance measures, benchmarks, and/or goals for the FY 2024/2025 contract.

IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS: During the term of this Agreement, Greater Sacramento shall indemnify, defend, hold, protect, and save harmless the Public Jurisdiction and any and all of its elected officials, officers, and employees from and against any and all actions, suits, proceed ings, claims and demands, loss, liens, costs, expense, and liability of any kind and nature whatsoever, for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property, including property owned by Public Jurisdiction brought, mad e, filed against, imposed upon, or sustained by the Public Jurisdiction, its officers, or employees arising out of a third party action, suit, proceeding, claim or demand caused by the negligent performance of Greater Sacramento’s obligations under this Agreement.

Any party entitled to indemnity shall promptly notify Greater Sacramento’s President & CEO in writing of the existence of any claim, demand, or other matter to which Greater Sacramento’s indemnification obligations would apply, shall investigate and mitiga te the harm, and shall cooperate with and give to Greater Sacramento a reasonable opportunity to defend the same at its own expense and with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the indemnified party. To the extent that notice is not timely provided to Greater Sacramento and Greater Sacramento is prejudiced thereby, Greater Sacramento’s indemnification obligations shall be reduced accordingly.

Nothing in this Subsection A shall be deemed to provide indemnification to any indemnified party with respect to any liabilities arising from the fraud, negligence, omissions, wrongful acts or willful misconduct of such indemnified party (including its officials, officers, employees and agents).

Greater Sacramento’s aggregate liability arising out of or relating to this Agreement, regardless of the form of the cause of action, whether in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be subject to the other terms of this Agreement and shall in no eve nt exceed the amounts paid by the Public Jurisdiction to Greater Sacramento for services to be provided by Greater Sacramento pursuant to the Agreement during the fis cal year ending on June 30, 2024, as set forth in this Agreement.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, Greater Sacramento shall not, under any circumstances, be liable for any claim for any consequential, incidental, indirect, punitive, exem plary or special damages of any nature whatsoever, or for any damages resulting from, arising out of, or in connection with any delays, loss of data, lost revenues, lost profits, interference, interruption of service, or loss of business or anticipatory profits, regardless of the form of action, whether in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise.

B. INSURANCE: Greater Sacramento shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, at Greater Sacramento’s own cost and expense, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with this Agreement by Greater Sacramento, its agents, representatives, employees, or contractors.

6 C. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY: During the performance of this Agreement, Greater Sacramento will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, creed, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions), sexual orientation and identity, national origin, ancestry, age, genetic information, citizenship, medical condition or illness, AIDS/HIV, ethnic background, physically or mentally disabled, retaliation, criminal record, military or veteran status, marital status, or political activities or affiliations, status as a victim of domestic violence, sexual harassment, assault, or stalking. Greater Sacramento also makes reasonable accommodations for handicapped and disabled employees. Finally , Greater Sacramento prohibits the harassment of any individual on any basis listed above, or any other consideration made unlawful by federal, state or local laws. All such discrimination is unlawful and will not be tolerated.

D. NONLIABILITY OF OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES: No member, official, or employee of the Public Jurisdiction will be personally liable to Greater Sacramento, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the Public Jurisdiction or for any amount which may become due to Greater Sacramento or successor, or on any obligation under the terms of this Agreement. No member, official, or employee of Greater Sacramento will be personally liable to the Public Jurisdiction, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by Greater Sacramento or for any amount which may become due to the Public Jurisdiction or successor, or on any obligation under the terms of this Agreement.

E. NOTICE: Any notice or other communication provided for herein or given hereunder to a Party hereto shall be in writing or delivered by electronic transmission, as designated by each Party, using the contact information below. Notices or communications in writing shall be given in person, by overnight courier, or by mail (registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return -receipt requested) to the respective Parties. Notices or communications may be delivered by electronic mail or facsimile, as designated by eac h Party, in a manner that creates a record that is capable of being retained, retrieved, and reviewed, and that may thereafter be rendered into clearly legible tangible form, unless or until either party revokes consent of use of that means of transmission for communications or either Party is unable to deliver communications by that means.

If to Greater Sacramento:

Greater Sacramento Economic Council
Attn: Chief Executive Officer
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2520
Sacramento, CA 95814
If to the Public Jurisdiction:

City of Roseville
Attn: City Manager
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

F. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: Both Parties agree, during the term of this Agreement and thereafter, to hold in strictest confidence, and not to use, except for the benefit of the other Party, or to disclose to any person, firm, or corporation without the prior written authorization o f either Party, any Confidential Information of either Party, except (i) as may be legally required to respond to a request pursuant to the California

7 Public Records Act (provided, however, the Parties acknowledge and agree that Greater Sacramento is not subject to the California Public Records Act), or (ii) in accordance with a judicial or governmental order, provided, however, that, to the extent reasonably possible, Public Jurisdiction shall give Greater Sacramento reasonable notice prior to making any such disclosure under (i) or (ii) above so Greater Sacramento may contest or seek a protective order (including, without limitation, a temporary restrai ning order) to prevent such disclosure if it so chooses, and provided further that Public Jurisdiction shall disclose only that portion of the Confidential Information that it is legally required to disclose. “Confidential Information ” means any of Greater Sacramento/the Public Jurisdiction’s proprietary and/or confidential information, technical data, trade secrets, or know -how, including, but not limited to, research, product plans, products, services, client lists, markets, trade se crets, software, devel opments, inventions, processes, formulas, technology, designs, drawings, engineering, hardware configuration information, marketing, finances, billing, charging, or other business information disclosed to one Party by the other, either directly or indirect ly, which is designated as confidential or that reasonably should be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and the circumstances of disclosure. Either Party may use the Confidential Information to the extent necessary for negotiations, discussions, and consultations with authorized personnel or authorized representatives or for any other purpose that either Party may hereafter authorize in writing; provided, however, that such authorized use does not create any license to use or disclose such Confidential Information except as explicitly granted by either Party. The Parties acknowledge that they are neither responsible nor liable for any business decisions made by the other Party in reliance upon any Confidential Information.

The Parties make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the Confidential Information. The Parties agree that in the event of any breach or threatened breach of this Section, either Party may obt ain, in addition to any other legal remedies, which may be available, such equitable relief as may be necessary to protect it against any such breach or threatened breach.

G. OWNERSHIP OF WORK PRODUCT: Public Jurisdiction acknowledges and agrees that all work product or deliverables prepared for, arising from, related to, or incorporated in the services to be provided by Greater Sacramento including, without limitation, all ideas, concepts, inventions, expressions, information, material, works of authorship, plans, programs, programming code, systems, work notes, drafts, specifications, design documents, flow charts, software programs, analyses, data, surveys, print copy, artwo rk, plates, photo negatives and positives, boards, preliminary outlines, sketches, letters, invoices, proposals, databases, and reports (collectively, “Work Product”) shall be owned solely and exclusively by Greater Sacramento, including without limitation, all corrections, modifications, and derivative works to such Work Product. The Work Product shall be considered Greater Sacramento’s Confidential Information.

H. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES: The Parties each represent and warrant as follows:

1. Each Party has full power, authority, and right to perform its obligations under the Agreement.

2. This Agreement is a legal, valid, and binding obligation of each Party, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms (except as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and equitable remedies).

8 3. Entering into this Agreement will not violate the charter or bylaws of either Party or any material contract to which that Party is also a party or any law applicable to a Party.

I. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES; BENEFICIARIES: Nothing in this Agreement will be deemed to create an agency, employment, partnership, fiduciary or joint venture between the Parties. No Party (nor any agent or employee of that Party) shall make any representations or warranties or incur any liability on behalf of the other Party. There are no third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement.

J. MODIFICATIONS: No amendment, change, or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by both Parties.

K. ASSIGNMENT: This Agreement and the services contemplated hereunder are personal to Greater Sacramento and the Public Jurisdiction and neither Party shall have the right or ability to assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the advanced written consent of the other Party. This Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors, and assigns.

L. GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

M. COUNTERPARTS/ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES: This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. For purposes of this Agreement, use of a facsimile, e-mail, or other electronic medium sh all have the same force and effect as an original signature.

N. SEVERABILITY: Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect under any appli cable law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provision or any other jurisdiction, but this Agreement will be reformed, construed, and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been contained herein.

O. ENTIRE AGREEMENT, WAIVERS, AND AMENDMENTS: This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof.

All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of the Public Jurisdiction or Greater Sacramento, and all amendments hereto must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of the parties hereto.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
The Agreement is executed as follows:

I, Dominick Casey, acknowledge that I am the City Manager of the City of Roseville, California, and as such officer, being authorized so to do, execute the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained, by signing as such officer.

By: _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Date: ______________________________
Attest: Approved as to Form:

I, Barry Broome, acknowledge that I am the President & CEO of the Greater Sacramento Economic Council, a California nonprofit corporation, and as such officer, being authorized so to do, execute the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained, by signing as such officer.

GREATER SACRAMENTO ECONOMIC COUNCIL,
A California nonprofit corporation
By: ______________________________ Date: __________________ Barry Broome, President & Chief Executive Officer
Michelle Sheidenberger, City AttorneyCarmen Avalos, City Clerk March 28, 2024
Annual
report
Fiscal Year
2023/2024
II
Named #3 economic development
organization in the world by IEDC

III
Table of
contentsContents
1 A letter from the Chair
2 A letter from the Vice Chair
3 T hree-year strategic plan
5 G rowth
9 S ustainability
11 E quity
13 C ompetitiveness
15 T eam
17 I nvestors
Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
1 Greater Sacramento Economic Council
A letter from
the Chair
As we close another remarkable year, it’s clear that our organization is at the forefront of economic development, driving transformative change both regionally and globally.

This fiscal year has been nothing short of extraordinary, filled with significant milestones and a surge of momentum that is propelling us to new heights. The national economic development community has taken notice—GSEC was honored as the #3 economic development organization in the world a second year in a row by the International Economic Development Council, a testament to our relentless pursuit of excellence.

As we prepare to celebrate GSEC’s 10th anniversary next year, we reflect on unparalleled growth and success. From our humble beginnings, we have ascended to global recognition, now ranked among the top three economic development organizations worldwide. Our efforts have led to the creation and retention of over 33,400 high-wage, high-quality jobs, attracting industry giants like Solidigm, HCL and Bosch to our region.

This past year, we boldly expanded our global footprint, establishing a presence in the Germany market. We sent 20 of our region’s leaders overseas to share our compelling story, further solidifying our reputation on the international stage. In a historic announcement, the A's announced they are heading to West Sacramento—a generational opportunity that underscores our region’s capacity to support multiple major-league teams and reinforces our standing as a prime destination for world-class enterprises.

In March, the Brookings Institution released its 2024 Metro Monitor rankings, assessing metropolitan areas across five broad categories. Our region ranked in the top 20 across all five categories—a staggering leap from our initial below-average ranking when the Metro Monitor debuted in 2017. This achievement underscores the dynamic progress we’ve made and the bright future that lies ahead.

Looking forward, the future of our region shines even brighter. The momentum we’ve built over the past year is a powerful reminder of what we can achieve when we work together. I am confident that GSEC’s influence will continue to grow, solidifying our role as a leader in global economic development.

This is a monumental achievement for any organization, especially one that is still in its first decade. I extend my deepest gratitude to our dedicated Board of Directors and community partners for your unwavering commitment to GSEC and our region. It has been an honor to serve as the GSEC Board Chair and I am eager to continue our work together as we advance Greater Sacramento’s economy.

Thank you for your continued support and dedication to our shared vision. Together, we are not just building a better future—we are shaping a brighter, more prosperous world for all.

Thank you,
Matina Kolokotronis
Chief Operating Officer
Sacramento Kings

2 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
A letter from
the Vice Chair
As we reflect on the past year, I am filled with immense pride and inspiration by the remarkable impact we have had on our region. Our collective efforts have not only driven growth and prosperity but have also significantly enhanced our region’s standing on both national and international stages.

The success we have achieved is a testament to the unparalleled collaboration between our public and private sector partners. Together, we have laid a strong foundation for continued progress, ensuring that growth, prosperity and equity are at the forefront of our shared mission for the six-county region.

Looking ahead, I am more motivated than ever to continue this journey.

Our work is far from over and I am confident that with the same level of dedication and innovation, we can take our organization to even greater heights. Together, we will catalyze further growth, foster prosperity and ensure equitable opportunities for all in our region.

Thank you for your unwavering commitment to our mission. I look forward to what we will achieve in the coming year.

Gary May
Chancellor
University of California, Davis
3 Greater Sacramento Economic Council
Three-year
strategic plan
In 2020, our region and the world were rocked by unprecedented challenges, leaving everyone uncertain of what was to come. During this time of uncertainty, GSEC’s leadership showed resilience and tenacity, coming together to face challenges and build a strategic plan focused on both recovery and growth, ensuring the Greater Sacramento region would be much quicker to recover from economic downturn than we were after the 2008 recession. T o carry out these goals, the GSEC Board adopted a three-year strategic plan in Fiscal Y ear 2021/2022, with a focus on four key growth, sustainability, equity and competitiveness.

Growth: The growth pillar will be achieved by growing tradable-sector jobs that reduce dependency on government jobs and create high-wage opportunities.

Sustainability: The sustainability pillar will focus on the retention and expansion of tradable-sector businesses already calling the region home, cluster development and growing the local talent base.

Equity: The equity pillar will grow apprenticeship networks that enhance access to careers at regional companies and expand training for upskilling, reskilling and preparedness for next generation industry opportunities.

Competitiveness: The competitiveness pillar will focus on developing strategies, programs and policy solutions that enhance tradable-sector economic development and benchmark regional progress against competitor markets.

See the progress the community has
made and the remaining work to be
done here in our prospectus.
2024
Prospectus
For more information about our
strategic plan click here or visit
GreaterSacramento.com/publications.

FY21-24
Strategic plan
4 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
Three-year scorecard
Fiscal Year 2023/2024 was the final year in GSEC's three-year strategic plan. By the close of the year, GSEC had met or exceeded all of the threshold metrics outlined in the plan.

GSEC met or exceeded all of the threshold metrics outlined in its 2021-2024 strategic plan. $10.2B
$92M
$116K
52 6,987
Growth
Three-year goals Threshold Goal Stretch
Jobs 4,500 5,000 6,000
Companies 45 50 60
Wages $55K $60K $62K
Economic impact $3.0B $3.3B $4B
Fiscal impacts $43M $47.9M $57M
6 750
$69.8M
Equity
Three-year goals Threshold Goal Stretch
Learners assisted 650 800 1,000
New companies in
Apprenticeship Network 5 6 8
CRA money deployed
through CRC $50M $75M $100M
Competitiveness
Benchmarking and
competitiveness dashboard
Local incentives overview
Jobs trust framework for
American Rescue Plan (ARP)
Maps of employment
ecosystems and centers
Three-year goal progress
Completed
Sustainability
304
3 $50.2M
Three-year goals Threshold Goal Stretch
BRE visits 300 450 500
Earned media $7M $10M $15M
Key market visits 2 3 4
5 Greater Sacramento Economic Council
Growth
GSEC’s business development team had an outstanding year, marked by both an increase in and diversification of its pipeline, with significant positive effects on the community.

Over the past year, the team facilitated the expansion of 19 companies in the Greater Sacramento region. A key highlight was Bosch’s $1.5 billion investment in Roseville, which further strengthened the region’s semiconductor ecosystem. Additionally, the team launched its Globalizing Greater Sacramento initiative to bolster international engagement, with international companies now comprising 35% of its pipeline. The cleantech and mobility sectors also experienced substantial growth, creating new opportunities for the market.

Scorecard
GSEC's nine-year impact
new companies
120
economic impact
$15.2B
total jobs

33.5K
total capital investment
$4.29B
fiscal impact
$199M
$52.2M
$91.1K
19 2,131
Annual goal Threshold Goal Stretch
Jobs 1,500.0 1,666.7 2,000.0
Companies 15.0 16.7 20.0
Wages $55K $60K $62K
Economic
impact $1B $1.1B $1.3B
Fiscal impacts $14.3M $16.0M $19.0M
$2.14B
6 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
Transformational initiative: Zero emission vehicle (ZEV) innovation asset We made significant progress with the California Mobility Center to build an Innovation Hub on the campus of Sacramento State. We helped with the hiring of a new CEO to ensure that funding is raised for the project to be built. In addition, we traveled to Washington, D.C. and met with key congressional, state and local representatives to discuss funding opportunities. We also met with industry leaders including Tesla, Bosch, Lion Electric, Rivian, Siemens and others to garner support for the project.

Key metrics
1K+
touchpoints to multiplier/
site selector network
Located companies in
9 communities
37%
of new projects came from our
multiplier/site selector network
5 market visits
5 site selection
consultants participated in
our familiarization tour
35%
of projects were
international companies
More than 32% of the business development
pipeline consisted of projects in the Clean
T echnology and Mobility sectors.

7 Greater Sacramento Economic Council
Locate summaries
Q1
Azra Games
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs: 10
Average wage:
$132,000
map-marker-alt City of Sacramento
Project Catalyst
Industry: Advanced
manufacturing
Number of jobs: 60
Average wage: $100,000
map-marker-alt City of West Sacramento
Mary Ann's Baking Co
Industry: Food and
agriculture
Number of jobs: 222
Average wage:
$43,000
map-marker-alt Sacramento County
Q2
Clutch
Industry: Advanced
business services
Number of jobs: 646
Average wage: $95,300
map-marker-alt City of Rancho Cordova
VideoVerse
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs: 25
Average wage: n/a
map-marker-alt City of Sacramento
ElveSpeed
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs: 23
Average wage: n/a
map-marker-alt City of Davis
21st.BIO
Industry: Bio-life
science
Number of jobs: 20
Average wage: n/a
map-marker-alt City of Davis
Project Mercury *
Industry: Bio-life science
Number of jobs: 5
Average wage: $95,000
map-marker-alt City of Rancho Cordova
* Company name is confidential.

Q3
Bosch
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs:

Confidential
Average wage: $88,000
map-marker-alt City of Roseville
Bequall
Industry: Standard
manufacturing
Number of jobs: 6
Average wage: $95,000
map-marker-alt Sacramento County
Samsung
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs: 50
Average wage:
$176,500
map-marker-alt City of Folsom
Arcadian Infracom
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs: 5
Average wage:
$150,000
map-marker-alt City of Sacramento
Q4
Maxgene
Industry: Agtech
Number of jobs: 4
Average wage: $95,000
map-marker-alt City of West
Sacramento
Onsight T echnologies
Industry: Cleantech
Number of jobs: 9
Average wage: n/a
map-marker-alt City of Folsom
California Safe Soil
Industry: Food &
Agriculture
Number of jobs: 50
Average wage: $60,000
map-marker-alt Sacramento County
NZT Group
Industry: Cleantech
Number of jobs: 20
Average wage: $98,000
map-marker-alt City of Sacramento
Nexture Bio
Industry: Agtech
Number of jobs: 5
Average wage:
$109,000
map-marker-alt City of Woodland
AMD
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs: 120
Average wage:

Undisclosed
map-marker-alt City of Folsom
Tiami Networks
Industry: Technology
Number of jobs: 9
Average wage: $97,000
map-marker-alt City of Elk Grove
8 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
9 Greater Sacramento Economic Council
Sustainability
In Fiscal Year 2023/2024 business retention and expansion (BRE) projects accounted for almost 24% of GSEC’s business development pipeline. GSEC is seeing more business expansions than retentions, particularly from companies the team had originally brought to the region. This suggests the region’s value proposition remains strong after a company’s initial decision to move here.

GSEC built on its digital outreach and lead generation platform this fiscal year, seeing continued progress and positive engagement with open rates consistently above 20%.

The team also had great success with its social media strategies, honing its efforts to increase its follower count across all platforms by 16% with exceptional audience growth rates on LinkedIn (28%) and Instagram (31%).

Scorecard
Annual goal Threshold Goal Stretch
BRE visits 100.0 150.0 166.7
Earned media $2.3M $3.3M $5.0M
Key market visits 0.7 1.0 1.3
$16.6M
103
0 10
Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
Be more. Do Greater Sacramento.

GSEC led a region-wide effort in a year-long process to develop a regional brand for business. The team held focus groups, conducted national media analyses and surveyed 3,800 current and former residents and CEOs. The resulting brand, “Be more. Do Greater Sacramento.”, is a rallying cry to tell the story of the region’s transformation into a top market to live, work and do business. The brand will launch locally in 2025 with plans to scale nationally and globally thereafter.

Key metrics
BRE Summary
The Business Development team has an annual goal to conduct 100 BRE visits with local companies. The purpose of these visits is to engage local industry partners, understand their needs and plans to foster growth and success in the region and how GSEC can support these efforts. Ensuring that industry trends in each community and sector are understood and pain points are addressed.

In Fiscal Year 2023/2024, the Business Development team met and exceeded its goal, conducting visits with 104 local companies from all six counties in our region. Of the locates declared to the Greater Sacramento region in Fiscal Year 2023/2024, 50% were local retention or expansion projects, accounting for $877 million in capital investment, 288,900 square feet and 1,087 jobs in the region.

Digital engagement

78.6K website
pageviews
28% increase
in LinkedIn followers
22-36%
cold email open rate

7.6% engagement
rate across all social channels
Transformational initiatives update:

New enterprise formation
We partnered with Sacramento Entrepreneurial Growth Alliance (SEGA) to develop a data analysis platform and lead strategic planning sessions to bolster the region’s startup ecosystem.
11 Scorecard
Greater Sacramento Economic Council
Equity
GSEC helped support and finance a new cohort of the Digital Upskill program run by the Greater Sacramento Urban League (GSUL) in partnership with Accenture and Bank of America. In addition, GSUL is working with UC Davis using the same model previously developed by GSEC to upskill workers for the university's IT departments. GSEC’s Community Reinvestment Coalition (CRC) also invested in two more local affordable housing developments.

Annual goal Threshold Goal Stretch
Learners assisted 216.7 266.7 333.3
New companies in
Apprenticeship Network 1.7 2.0 2.7
CRA money deployed
through CRC $16.7M $25.0M $33.3M
328
0 $20.8M
12 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
13 Greater Sacramento Economic Council
Competitiveness
GSEC is using its progress on competitiveness tactics to support further work on strategies for community economic development, real estate and more. The team completed all the three-year goals within the Competitiveness pillar this fiscal year.

Benchmarking
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Benchmarking and competitiveness dashboard
Maps of employment ecosystems and centers
Local incentives overview
Jobs trust framework for
American Rescue Plan (ARP)
Globalizing Greater Sacramento
GSEC unveiled its new international initiative, ‘Globalizing Greater Sacramento’ to expand international business opportunities and enhance direct air services to the Greater Sacramento region. GSEC’s launch event for the initiative brought together 200 community leaders. As part of the initiative, GSEC formed a Regional Air Alliance in partnership with Sacramento International Airport. Composed of public, private and nonprofit leaders, the group is collaborating to bolster flight connectivity between Sacramento and key domestic and international markets. GSEC also led a delegation of 20 regional leaders on a successful market visit to Germany. The group met with industry giants such as Bosch, BMW and Mercedes-Benz, and showcased the transformational growth taking place in the Greater Sacramento region. 14 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
In an effort to keep community members informed about key economic development initiatives happening in the region, GSEC hosted two engagED conversations programs in El Dorado and Placer County , as well as an engagED forum covering region-wide topics. In total, these programs had over 200 highly engaged attendees and provided critical information about transformational initiatives to community members.

Additionally, GSEC launched its engagED newsletter, reaching over 1,600 subscribers monthly . This newsletter keeps subscribers up to date on regional news and events.

GSEC’s 2024 Annual Celebration was an unforgettable gathering of nearly 600 of the region’s most dedicated community leaders , with over 100 individual organizations represented . 600+ of the region’s top business leaders, CEOs and elected officials came together to celebrate the region’s economic wins and the honorees who championed them.

Sacramento Business Journal 40 Under 40 honoree
▪ Brittany Jones, Chief Performance Officer
Sacramento Business Journal C-Suite Awards honoree
▪ Troels Adrian, Executive Vice President
IEDC Excellence in Economic Development Awards
▪ Named #3 economic development organization in the world ▪ Gold award and Best in Show nomination for #CApitalMomentum video Other major achievements:
15 Team
Barry Broome
President & CEO
Brittany Jones
Chief Performance
Officer
Troels Adrian
Executive Vice
President
Executive & Administrative
Jasmine Ward
Vice President, Marketing
& Communications
Hugo Martinez
Associate Creative
Director
Marketing & Communications
Hayden Kandul
Sr. Business Development
Project Manager
Nick Guptil
Associate Project Manager,
Business Development
DaSean Spencer
Business Development
Coordinator
Lucy Lu Roberts
Director of Business
Development
Business Development
Danea Thomas
Director of Finance &
Administration
Olivia Cano
Director, Events &
Engagement
Isabel Drapela
Investor Engagement
Coordinator
Administration & Engagement
Joe Figueroa
Manager of Research
Research & Strategy
Greater Sacramento Economic Council
16 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
Investors
Board of Directors
Officers
Directors
Chair Vice Chair Treasurer
Michael Korpiel
President/CEO, Mercy San
Juan Medical Center
Mark Noriega
Managing Director
Gary May
Chancellor
Secretary
Alex Wicks
Co-founder & CEO
Rachel Zillner
Co-Founder & CEO
Donald T erry
Senior Vice President,
Community Reinvestment
Act Officer
Rachel Radell-Harris
Mayor
Bobbie Singh-Allen
Mayor
Jeremiah Smith
President & CEO
Harry C. Elliott, III
President
Gloria Partida
Councilmember
Doris Matsui
Representative, California
7th Congressional District
John Hidahl
Supervisor, District 1
Jeff Butler
President
Kyriakos Tsakopoulos
Co-Chair
Sheri Peifer
President & CEO
Matina Kolokotronis
Chief Operating Officer
Dale Carlsen
President & CEO
Alvin Cheung
Founding President
James Wood
Executive Director, Region
Sales Director
Cameron Law
Executive Director
Larry Allbaugh
CEO
Greater Sacramento Economic Council
17 Ashley Feeney
City Manager
Don Clark
Co-CEO

Chris Erias
Interim City Manager
John Jackson, Jr.

President & Owner
Brian King
Chancellor
Mark Friedman
Founder & Chairman
Brian T ernan
President & CEO
Wendy Cohen
President & CEO
Larry Kelley
President & CEO
Rosario Rodriguez
Councilmember
Dwayne Crenshaw
President & CEO
Kimberly Menzel
Senior Vice President & Area
Manager
Dominique Belza
Councilmember
Bonnie Gore
Supervisor, District 1
Steve Pleau
President & CEO
Ken Monroe
President
Paul Joiner
Mayor
Derrick Niello
Chief Financial Officer
Danny Cartwright
Mayor
Donna Bland
President & CEO
John Jackson
President & Competitiveness
Council Co-Chair
James Beckwith
President & CEO
Dave Lucchetti
Executive Chairman
of the Board
Jeff Dern
President & CEO
Mike T eel
Owner & Chairman
of the Board
David Sander
Mayor
Stephen Fleming
President & CEO
Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
18 Rachel Downs
Business Engagement
Manager & EDDT Chair
Dave Shaw
Vice Mayor
T om Stallard
Councilmember
Gary Bradford
Supervisor, District 4
Garry Maisel
President & CEO
Lucas Frerichs
Supervisor, District 2
David Villanueva
County Executive
Greg Janda
Mayor
Krista Bernasconi
Vice Mayor
Darrell Steinberg
Mayor
Colleen McCain Nelson
Executive Editor, The
Sacramento Bee / Regional
Editor for California, McClatchy
Rachael McKinney
President, Greater
Sacramento Market
Jud Riggs
Chairman, CEO & President
Greg Connolly
Founder
Paul Lau
CEO & General Manager
Dan Flores
Supervisor, District 2
Cathy Rodriguez Aguirre
President & CEO
Azizza Davis Goines
President & CEO
Kevin Nagle
CEO
Faye Nabhani
President & CEO
J. Luke Wood
President
Chrysanthy Demos
President
Michael Guyette
President & CEO
Sabya Das
President & COO
Aaron Laurel
City Manager
George Grinzewitsch, Jr.

Owner & CEO
Greater Sacramento Economic Council
19 Kyle Zimbelman
Economic and Business
Relations Manager & EDDT
Vice Chair
John Jackson
President
Competitiveness Council
Co-Chairs
William H. Duncan IV
President
Council
Jay Day
Executive Director,
Government &
External Affairs
Eric Oddo
Program Manager
Dan Beans
Roseville Electric Utility
Director
Henry Li
General Manager & CEO
Jenni Murphy
Sr. Innovation Fellow,
Workforce & Educations
Partnerships
Aren Bazzocco
Division President
T erry Harvego
Co-Owner
Wendy Nelson
Director of Strategic
Partnerships
Jennifer Hall
Managing Director
Michael Moore
Partner/Principal
Lori Rianda
Senior Vice President-
Market Executive
Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual report
20 Greater Sacramento Economic Council
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 ANNUAL REPORT
400 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 2520 | SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 GREATERSACRAMENTO.COM | 916 441 2144
@SELECTSAC @SELECTSAC @SELECTSAC

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3560
File #:
0323
Title:

Roseville Municipal Code Amendment – Kennel Licenses
Contact:

Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Sections

7.10.020 and 7.20.020 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding kennel licenses.

BACKGROUND
Chapter 7.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code governs the operation of kennels within city limits.

Pursuant to Section 7.20.010, no more than 3 dogs over the age of 4 months may be kept at any premises unless the owner secures a license to operate a kennel. Pursuant to Section 7.20.020, the animal control officer shall issue a kennel license only under the following conditions:

1 .

The premises upon which the kennel is located complies with the City’s zoning code; and 2 .

The premises is of sufficient size to accommodate the number of dogs anticipated to be kept at the kennel, without causing any disturbance or annoyance to persons in the surrounding area.

Section 7.20.020 also specifically prohibits any kennel from existing upon property zoned for residential use.

The California legislature recently enacted Government Code § 8608.1, which requires that any person seeking a kennel license also create and submit to the approving jurisdiction an animal natural disaster evacuation plan covering the kennel to be operated under the permit. This proposed Ordinance amends the City’s requirements for obtaining a kennel license to be consistent with state law by incorporating the requirement that an applicant submit an animal natural disaster evacuation plan as a condition to receiving a kennel license.

In recent months, the City has also received numerous requests from community members to increase the number of dogs allowed without a kennel license. Currently, no more than 3 dogs are allowed to be kept at any single premises without a kennel license. This proposed Ordinance would increase the number of dogs allowed without a kennel license to 4.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed Ordinance.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute Section 21065 and CEQA State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) and Section 15378. The proposed Ordinance meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A – Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F – Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Travis Cochran, Deputy City Attorney
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Kennel License Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. ____

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTIONS

7.20.010 AND 7.20.020 OF CHAPTER 7.20 OF TITLE 7 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL

CODE REGARDING KENNEL LICENSES

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 7.20.010 of Chapter 7.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

7.20.010 Kennels-License required.

No more than threefour dogs over the age of four months shall be kept at or upon any premises or dwelling unit without first securing from the animal control officer a license to operate a kennel regardless of the number of persons residing in such dwelling unit.

SECTION 2. Section 7.20.020 of Chapter 7.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

7.20.020 License issuance.

The animal control offer shall issue a license to operate a kennel only under the following conditions:
2 A. When the premises on which the kennel will be located complies with the provisions of the zoning code of the city;
B. When the premises on which the kennel will be located is of sufficient size to accommodate, in the opinion of the animal control officer, the number of dogs which the owner of such kennel anticipates will be on the premises, without causing any disturbance or annoyance to persons in the surrounding area;
C. The applicant has prepared and submitted to the city an animal natural disaster evacuation plan covering the kennel to be operated under the license.

D. No kennel may exist upon any property zoned for residential use.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

3 AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3558
File #:
0400-07
Title:

Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 1 Parcel F-30 - Parcel Map
Contact:

Edward Winston (916) 774-5432 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
It is recommended that the City Council approve the parcel map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public easements offered thereon for dedication; and approve the abandonment of the easement listed thereon.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services - Engineering Division has reviewed the subject parcel map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met.

This map will be creating 3 lots for future development.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council approval of the Fiddyment Ranch Phase 1 F-30 Parcel Map project is an action that is subject to CEQA. Project level CEQA compliance for the Fiddyment Ranch Phase 1 F-30 Parcel Map project was accomplished with preparation of the Fiddyment Road Self-Storage Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted: December 14, 2023) (SCH: 2023110589).

Because the Fiddyment Ranch Phase 1 F-30 Parcel Map project is consistent with the project evaluated in the Fiddyment Road Self-Storage Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Fiddyment Road Self-Storage Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented.

As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Edward Winston, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Parcel Map
Vicinity Map
JULY 2024 1204 "E" STREET, MARYSVILLE, CA 95901SHEET OF 2MHM JOB # 24126 BOOK ____ OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE ____PARCEL MAP OFFIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 1PARCEL F-30WEST ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL F-30SUBDIVISION NO. PL23-0032BEING A DIVISION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP ENTITLED "FIDDYMENT RANCH- PHASE 1 PARCEL F-30" AS SUCH MAP IS RECORDED IN BOOK 36 OF PARCELMAPS, PAGE 94 IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.PROPERTY ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T. 11 N., R. 5 E.,MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OFPLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS SINCE 1892
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY RECORD TITLEINTEREST IN THE LANDS SUBDIVIDED HEREON AND THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION ANDRECORDING OF THIS PARCEL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH PHASE 1 PARCEL F-30, AND HEREBY OFFER FORDEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:A.PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF STORM DRAIN PIPES, ACCESSFOR MAINTENANCE, AND ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER, AND ACROSS THATSTRIP OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED AS STORM DRAIN EASEMENT (S.D.E.)B.PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF WATER PIPES WITH ACCESS FORMAINTENANCE, ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO, ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THATSTRIP OF LAND 25' IN WIDTH SHOWN HEREON AS "WATERLINE EASEMENT" (W.E.).

BY: PATRICK LAUGHLIN AS TRUSTEE OF THE PATRICK LAUGHLIN TRUST DATED MARCH 9, 1999 BY: RANJIT S. KHAGURA AS TRUSTEE OF THE R & S KHAGURA FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 17, 2022 BY: SEAN O'NEILL, A MARRIED MAN, AS HIS SOLE AND SEPARATE PROPERTYATKINSON SELF-STORAGE LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: GARRY LAUGHLIN, MANAGER
OWNER'S STATEMENTTHIS PARCEL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 1 PARCEL 30 WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FILED SURVEY INCONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT ANDLOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF SEAN O'NEILL, PATRICK LAUGHLIN, RANJIT S. KHAGURA, GARRY LAUGHLIN ON FEBRUARY 23, 2024. I HEREBY STATE THAT THISMAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLYAPPROVED TENTATIVE MAP; THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTERAND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED AND ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THESURVEY TO BE RETRACED.

I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PARCEL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH -PHASE 1 PARCEL 30 AND FIND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THETENTATIVE MAP ON FILE AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALLPROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCESHAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. MARC STOUT DATE CITY ENGINEER, R.C.E. 69879EXPIRES: 09-30-24I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS PARCEL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 1 PARCEL 30 IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.FOR MARC STOUT, CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE TIMOTHY G. BLAIRPLS.#8278 EXPIRATION DATE: 12/31/25
DATE
BY:

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
RECORDER'S CERTIFICATEFILED THIS DAY OF , 2024, AT : .M. INBOOK OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF MHM INC.

RYAN RONCOPLACER COUNTY RECORDERFILE NO.

P.L.S. 8457JOHN S. MALLENEXPIRES: 12-31-2024
FEE PD.DEPUTY RECORDER
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THEIDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE ISATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.COUNTY OF STATE OF }SS ON BEFORE ME , NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED , WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGEDTO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZEDCAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THEPERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTEDTHE INSTRUMENT.I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIATHAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.WITNESS MY HAND.SIGNATURE OF NOTARYNOTARY'S NAMEMY COMMISSION NUMBER MY COMMISSION EXPIRES PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS (County)

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK, NAMED AS THE BENEFICIARY INTHAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 17, 2024, RECORDED JANUARY 23, 2024, ASRECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2024-3322, OFFICIAL RECORDS, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS PARCEL MAP.

BY: TITLE:

BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THEIDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE ISATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.COUNTY OF STATE OF }SS ON BEFORE ME , NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED, WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGEDTO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZEDCAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THEPERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTEDTHE INSTRUMENT.I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIATHAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.WITNESS MY HAND.SIGNATURE OF NOTARYNOTARY'S NAMEMY COMMISSION NUMBER MY COMMISSION EXPIRES PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS (County)

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1 O NNO EHSNTATE ROFPJOISSO
VLLN75A8CFL.SFIL4RO ENAI RYOEUAMALLS.NDASR
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE HAS APPROVED THISPARCEL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 1 PARCEL 30 AND HAS ACCEPTED THE PUBLICEASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FOR DEDICATION; AND HAS APPROVED THE ABANDONMENTOF THE EASEMENT LISTED HEREON WITHIN NOTE 1 ON SHEET 2.DATED __________________ _____________________________________ CITY CLERK, CITY OF ROSEVILLE______________________________________ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
HTMO
AIRBG.LYIT
N89°05'09"E9.00'(R1,M)N44°05'09"E18.16'(R1,M)
N0°54'51"W172.01' (R1, M)
N88°56'45"E 305.17'(R1,M)
N0°52'02"W 288.85'(R1,M)65.63'
239.54'

47.00'43.60'N0°51'43"W208.07'
45' S.S.E. (R2)
N89°33'02"E 77.65'
N0°41'46"E 131.47'N5°29'54"E 93.39'(R1,M)
N18°36'58"E 348.31'(R1,R2,M)
N0°26'58"W 166.75'(R1,M)N0°26'58"W 97.32'C1C2
N73°22'44"E 412.66'(R1,R2,M)
N89°59'59"E 10.00'(R1,M)
N0°00'01"W 48.00'(R1,M)
N89°59'59"E 20.86'(R1,M)
N51°50'21"E19.06'(R1,M)N89°10'53"E30.21'(R1,M)
N88°07'52"E 489.30'(R1,M)N32°42'01"W 87.86'
50'
50'
50' P.U.E. / P.E. (R2)
50' S.S.E. (DOC #2001-0079231)EXISTING BOUNDARYTYP.

EXISTING BOUNDARYTYP.
50' P.U.E. (R2)SEE NOTE 1
45' S.S.E. (DOC. #2001-0079231)
50' S.S.E. (DOC. #2001-0074684)
20' S.D.E. (R2)
RECIPROCAL EASEMENTAREA (DOC. #2007-0104599)
10' DE PERDOC#2007-0104600
PARCEL 2(BK. 36 OF PM'S PG. 94)
S81°23'18"W130.00'
35' PUE / PE (R6)
OLD LOT LINES(MOVED PER R4)
N45°49'18"E 2.41'(R1,M)
N0°26'58"W 1003.72' (B.O.B.)(R1,R2,M)
C3
C4C5L1L2CL OF 30'S.D.E. PERTHIS MAPN89°08'17"E 90.60'(R1,R2,M) (R1,M)
N52°10'30"E 101.69'(R1,R2,M)

BASIS OF BEARINGS
FND. REBAR & CAP LS 6046FND. REBAR & CAP LS 6046
FND. REBAR & CAP LS 6046
FND. REBAR & CAP LS 6046
25' W.E. PER THIS MAP
35' PUE / PE (R6)738.43' (R1,R2,M)265.29' (R1,R2,M)

48.0'

38.0'
FND. REBAR & CAP LS 6046
FND. REBAR & CAP LS 6046

70.0'
N0°54'51"W96.00' (R1, M)N74°02'32"E190.80' (R1, M)
(R1,M)(R1,M)
LINE TABLENO.L1L2L3L4L5
LENGTH7.88'22.46'36.08'16.40'86.40'
BEARINGN82° 55' 14"WN07° 04' 46"EN00° 41' 46"EN00° 26' 58"WS82° 55' 14"E REF. CURVE TABLENO.C1C2C3C4C5
LENGTH48.9448.4554.3696.0949.08
RADIUS31.0031.0040.00545.0040.00
DELTA90°26'57"89°33'03"77°51'33"10°06'06"70°18'25"
CHORDBEARINGN44° 46' 30"EN45° 13' 30"WS41° 29' 48"EN7° 37' 04"WN47° 49' 20"W CHORDLENGTH44.0143.6750.2795.9646.06
REF.

JULY 2024 1204 "E" STREET, MARYSVILLE, CA 95901SHEET OF 2MHM JOB # 24126 BOOK ____ OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE ____PARCEL MAP OFFIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 1PARCEL F-30WEST ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL F-30SUBDIVISION NO. PL23-0032BEING A DIVISION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP ENTITLED "FIDDYMENT RANCH- PHASE 1 PARCEL F-30" AS SUCH MAP IS RECORDED IN BOOK 36 OF PARCELMAPS, PAGE 94 IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.PROPERTY ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T. 11 N., R. 5 E.,MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OFPLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS SINCE 1892
3" 1"01/2"080'240' 40'SCALE: 1"=80'
RECORD REFERENCES(R1)BOOK 36 OF PARCEL MAPS PAGE 94 FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 1 PARCEL F-30(R2)AA MAPS 10 FINAL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH PHASE 1 - LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION(R3)BB MAPS 24 FINAL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH PHASE 1 - LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION(R4)DOC. #2008-0033045 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(R5)22 RS 66 RECORD OF SURVEY NO.3254(R6)DOC. #2007-0031325 GRANT EASEMENT BASIS OF BEARINGSTHE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE CENTERLINE OF FIDDYMENT ROADAS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP OF FIDDYMENT RANCH PHASE 1 - LARGE LOTSUBDIVISION FILED IN BOOK AA OF MAPS, AT PAGE 10. O.R.P.C., SAID LINE IS TAKEN TOBEAR NORTH 00°26'58" WEST.LEGENDWITNESS CORNEREMBRACES RECORD DATAPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTPEDESTRIAN EASEMENTSANITARY SEWER EASEMENTSTORM DRAIN EASEMENTWATER EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENTCENTERLINEMEASUREDSQUARE FEETBASIS OF BEARINGSFOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH CAPSTAMPED "LS 8067" OR AS SHOWNSET 5/8" REBAR W / CAP LS 8457CALCULATED POINT - NOTHINGFOUND OR SETFOUND BRASS DISK STAMPED "LS 7944" IN MONUMENT WELLFOUND BRASS DISK STAMPED "LS 6046" IN MONUMENT WELL WC(R)P.U.E.P.E.

MS.F.(B.O.B.)
S.S.E.S.D.E.W.E.DECL
R1R1
N45°49'18"E 2.41'N52°10'30"E 101.69'
N0°26'58"W 166.75'
DETAIL "A"1"=10'
SEE DETAIL "A"
NOTES1.PER SECTION 66434(g) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE 50' P.E., PREVIOUSLYCOMBINED WITH THE 50' P.U.E. SHOWN, NOT SHOWN HEREON IS ABANDONED. SAIDABANDONED 50' P.E. WAS DEFINED AS "AND "PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS" (P.E.)" INTHE ITEM A OFFER OF DEDICATION ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK AA OF MAPSAT PAGE 10 (R2).

S.D.E.S.D.E.S.D.E.

S.D.E.S.D.E.
2 L2L1S.D.E.S.D.E.S.D.E.

MAPLOCATIONHARVEY WAY
1,200'0150'300'600'

FIDDYMENT ROAD

BLUE OAKS BLVD
JULY 20241204 "E" STREET, MARYSVILLE, CA 95901SHEET 1 OF 1MHM JOB # 24126 VICINITY MAP FOR PARCEL MAP OFFIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 1PARCEL F-30WEST ROSEVILLE SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL F-30SUBDIVISION NO. PL23-0032BEING A DIVISION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP ENTITLED "FIDDYMENT RANCH- PHASE 1 PARCEL F-30" AS SUCH MAP IS RECORDED IN BOOK 36 OF PARCELMAPS, PAGE 94 IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.PROPERTY ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T. 11 N., R. 5 E.,MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OFPLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS SINCE 1892

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3567
File #:0102-06
Title:

Proclamation - Cybersecurity Month October 2024
Contact:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 6.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Proclaim October 2024 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month in Roseville and officially support the National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, ‘Secure our World’, and the National Public Awareness Campaign, ‘Stop. Think. Connect.™’, and call upon all employees, residents and visitors of Roseville to become educated about cybersecurity and put that knowledge into practice to keep our connected community safe from cyber threats.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Ceremonial documents meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Proclamation - Cybersecurity Month October 2024

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3562
File #:
0600
Title:

Retired Annuitant 180-Day Wait Period Exception
Contact:

Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 7.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an exception to the 180-day wait period for public agencies to hire a retired annuitant as allowed by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) and in compliance with California Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224.

BACKGROUND
The California Public Employees Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) requires a 180-day wait period before a retiree can return to work for a public agency; however, the 180-day wait period can be waived so long as City Council certifies the need to fill the critically needed position before 180 days have passed by resolution in a public meeting, and so long as the retiree did not retire with a retirement incentive such as the CalPERS Golden Handshake (i.e., 2 years additional service credit). In addition to the requirements of PEPRA, the appointment of a retiree to a position that is utilized for a limited timeframe and special project work must comply with Section 21224 of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL).

Bryan Buchanan, former Wastewater Utility Manager with the Environmental Utilities Department, was an employee of the City for 29 years and retired from City services on May 30, 2024.

Approval of this resolution would allow him to be rehired as an annuitant, without waiting the 180 days after the retirement waiting period (but after a 60-day bona fide separation period). Mr. Buchanan would be brought back based on his 29 years of specialized knowledge and skills needed to complete the work and to successfully implement several complex critical wastewater projects. His return is needed to complete the Wholesale Agreement for Recycled Water with Placer County, Equivalent Dwelling Unity Study, Industrial Pretreatment Update and Commercial Discharger Program Development, Recycled Water System Evaluation and Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Solids Train Process Optimization Study. Environmental Utilities is currently without the institutional and specialized knowledge needed to carry out all these highly specialized projects that are mission critical to providing safe and secure public infrastructure and services.

With Mr.

Buchanan
’s retirement, the Wastewater division has lost significant institutional knowledge to efficiently move forward several mission critical projects. Therefore, the Environmental Utilities Department recommends City Council approval for Bryan Buchanan
to
come back as a part-time retired annuitant on an emergency basis, without waiting 180 days, to complete complex, specialized wastewater projects over approximately the next 12 months. Staff confirms that Mr.

Buchanan
will be paid at J step ($79.6278 hourly) of the Principal Engineer salary range on schedule B, and he will not receive any retirement incentive, nor will he receive any additional benefits as a retired annuitant.

FISCAL IMPACT
Based on the 960-hour limit that a retired annuitant may work, the maximum fiscal impact is estimated to be $76,442.69. This can be absorbed in the current Environmental Utilities Department’s FY2024-25 budget in the Wastewater Operations Fund due to salary savings from vacant positions.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed retired annuitant 180 day wait period exception meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Macy Dippert, Human Resources Manager
Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-336
Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 24-336

RESOLUTION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE 180-DAY WAIT PERIOD
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 7522.56 AND 21224

WHEREAS, in compliance with Government Code section 7522.56 the City of Roseville City Council must provide CalPERS this certification resolution when hiring a retiree before 180 days has passed since his or her retirement date; and

WHEREAS, Bryan Buchanan, CalPERS ID 3831513094 retired from City of Roseville in the position of Wastewater Utility Manager effective May 30, 2024; and

WHEREAS, section 7522.56 requires that post-retirement employment commence no earlier than 180 days after the retirement date, which is November 26, 2024 without this certification resolution; and

WHEREAS, section 7522.56 provides that this exception to the 180 day wait period shall not apply if the retiree accepts any retirement-related incentive; and

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville City Council, City of Roseville, and Bryan Buchanan certify that Bryan Buchanan has not and will not receive a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive; and

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville City Council hereby appoints Bryan Buchanan as an extra help retired annuitant to perform the duties of a Principal Engineer for the City of Roseville under Government Code section 21224, effective October 5, 2024; and

WHEREAS, the entire employment agreement, contract or appointment document between Bryan Buchanan and the City of Roseville has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and

WHEREAS, no matters, issues, terms or conditions related to this employment and appointment have been or will be placed on a consent calendar; and

WHEREAS, the employment shall be limited to 960 hours per fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and

WHEREAS, the maximum monthly base salary for Principal Engineer on Salary Schedule: Management-B is $79.6278 hourly and the monthly equivalent is $6,370.22, and the minimum hourly rate for this position is $59.4196 and the monthly equivalent is $4,753.57; and

WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to Bryan Buchanan will be step J, $79.6278; and

WHEREAS, Bryan Buchanan has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Roseville City Council hereby certifies the nature of the appointment of Bryan Buchanan as described herein and detailed in the attached employment agreement/contract/appointment document and that this appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Principal Engineer for the City of Roseville by October 5, 2024 because he has specialized skills to complete complex development of new private property and training of new engineers.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

Exhibit A

To: Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director
Macy Dippert, Human Resources Manager

From: Richard D. Plecker, P.E., Environmental Utilities Director

CC: Sean Bigley, Assistant Environmental Utilities Director Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Utility Manager

Date: Aug 23, 2024

Subject: Proposed scope of duties/time frame for a proposed Retired Annuitant, Bryan Buchanan

Scope of Duties

As required, I am submitting the proposed scope of duties for a proposed Retired Annuitant, Bryan Buchanan. The proposed duties include:

Special Project assignments:

Project Reason Bryan’s Help is Needed
Wholesale Agreement for
Recycled Water with Placer
County
This agreement is required to be developed per the SPWA Joint Powers Agreement and the County’s developers are
currently constructing recycled water infrastructure that they are wanting to tie into our existing recycled water system. We need Bryan’s background, knowledge, and relationships with County staff to help get the agreement and wholesale rate developed and approved in a timely manner. This is the highest priority task within this table.

Equivalent Dwelling Unit
(EDU) Study, Phase 2.

The SPWA approved this project in June 2024, and are
deciding if they want to move forward with this study in September 2024. If this study is to move forward, we need Bryan’s knowledge of the collection system to help develop a sampling plan. Staff is also in need of Bryan’s help in getting this project going due to staff bandwidth issues.

Industrial Pretreatment
Update and Commercial
Discharger Program
Development (Project
500342).

We just kicked this project off on August 20, 2024. Tracie Mueller is currently the project manager but does not have the bandwidth to carry this project forward. Bryan is the only other person that has the understanding of the Industrial
Pretreatment Program and the need for a Commercial
Discharger Program that also has experience as a project manager. This is a 19-month long project.
2025 Wastewater Systems
Evaluation
This project was approved by SPWA in June 2024 and will be managed by Arashdeep Singh, Senior Engineer. We will need Bryan’s technical advisory support on this project. The need Memorandum
Environmental Utilities – Administration
for Bryan’s support for this project will likely not begin until December 2024 to due bandwidth issues with Arashdeep’s
current workload.

Dry Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant (DCWWTP)
Solids Train Process
Optimization Study (Project
500268).

We are expecting chapters of the draft report for this project in September 2024 and more in October 2024 with the goal of completing this project in the early part of 2025. We would like Bryan’s technical review of this document based on his history and engineering understanding of the challenges we have faced with the biosolids treatment at the DCWWTP.

Recycle Water System
Evaluation (Project 500310)
We received a draft report in June 2024 and would like
Bryan’s assistance in reviewing this important document as he has the most historical knowledge of the existing recycled water system, the agreements made between the City and the County, and customer water use and relationships. We would also like Bryan’s help in helping guide staff in the implement of the recommendations which involve modifications to the operations of the existing system to optimize the supply and use of recycled water.

Other duties:
- Rates and Connection Fee support – EU is currently in the process of developing FY25 and FY26 rates and local connection fee updates for the Wastewater Utility. Tracie would like to be able to ask Bryan questions about as needed.
- Research and recommendations on development-related questions – The County has a few projects surrounding the DCWWTP that Bryan has been involved. It would be helpful to have access to his background discussions with these developers who are currently in the planning and design phases.

These duties require Bryan’s specialized skills and knowledge, and we are requesting his support per Administrative Regulation 2.23 (AR 2.23), Section A Criteria for Assignment 1 which is per Government Code Section 21224.

Duration of Services

To provide adequate time for development of the agenda item for City Council consideration, assuming such request is approved, we propose that Mr. Buchanan start Monday, September 23, 2024. We would propose a 12-month duration for the Retired Annuitant contract. We would reserve the right to approach Human Resources for additional time beyond 12 months, depending upon whether there is a need for additional services or not.

Eligibility and Waiting Period

Bryan Buchanan retired on May 30, 2024 and was younger than the normal service retirement age. We are requesting a hire date beyond the 60-day requirement but prior to the 180-day waiting period. Therefore we have met the bona fide separation requirements set forth in Section D of AR 2.23 and per Government Code Section 21220.5 and request that this request be sent to City Council to met AR 2.23 Section 5 Waiting Requirement 2.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3551
File #:
0400-02 & 0400-04-17-2
Title:

Infill Parcel 198 (100 Stonehouse Court) WellSpace Health - Rezone Contact:

Escarlet Mar 916-774-5247 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 10/2/2024
Item #: 8.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
At the August 8, 2024 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council take the following actions on the project:

1 .

Consider the WellSpace Health Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
; and
2 .

Adopt two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an ordinance approving the Rezone.

BACKGROUND
The project site is located on a 1.56-acre parcel within Parcel 198 of the City’s Infill area at the southeast corner of Stonehouse Court and Taylor Road (see Attachment 1). The site is bounded by Stonehouse Court to the north, a vacant parcel to the east, an automotive use to the south, and a 0.50-acre landscape strip to the west. The site has a zoning designation of Industrial/Business Park (MP) and a land use designation of Community Commercial (CC). On January 20, 1983, the Project Review Commission approved a Site Review Permit (SR 82-50) to allow Placer County Welfare to develop a 15,998 square foot, single-story office for social services-type uses. The building was subsequently occupied by a church use until 2023. The building is now vacant.

The applicant's request is to amend the zoning designation of approximately 1.56-acres of Infill Parcel 198 from MP to Community Commercial/Special Area (CC/SA) to allow medical services with approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP).

Associated with this request was a CUP, Design Review Permit Modification (DRPMOD), and an Administrative Permit (AP), which the Planning Commission unanimously approved at their August 8, 2024 meeting. The DRPMOD would allow WellSpace Health to modify the exterior of the existing building and add site accessibility improvements. The AP would allow a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use.

Summary Evaluation
The existing General Plan land use designation of the property is CC, and the existing zoning designation of the property is MP. The project site is not within a specific plan area and medical services are not an allowed use in the MP zone. The applicant proposes to change the zoning designation of the parcel from MP to CC/SA to allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site with the approval of a CUP (see Attachment 2 for a proposed list of allowable uses in the proposed CC/SA zone).

The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan land use for the site. The City of Roseville General Plan provides a list of compatible “Implementing Zones” for each land use designation (General Plan Table II-10), which establishes what zoning designations are considered compatible with the applicable General Plan land use designation. The CC zone district is considered one of the implementing zones for the CC land use; however, the MP zone is also compatible with the Light Industrial (LI), General Industrial (IND), or the Tech/Business Park (T/BP) land use designations. According to Section 19.14.010 of the Zoning Ordinance, the MP zone is intended to “designate areas appropriate for the development of a mixture of light industrial, office and commercial land uses”. In comparison, the CC zone is intended to “serve the principal retail shopping needs of the entire community by providing areas for shopping centers, and other retail and service uses.” The proposed CC/SA zoning designation of the project site will be consistent with the City’s General Plan.

The project site is located in an area along Taylor Road with a range of uses from typical commercial (e.g., restaurant), to more intense commercial (e.g., RV sales and repair), to heavy commercial/light industrial (e.g., autobody repair and paint). The existing surrounding uses are either principally permitted (e.g., restaurant), or conditionally permitted (e.g., RV sales and autobody repair/painting) in the CC zone. Rezoning the project site to CC/SA in order to allow for medical services will be compatible with the existing surrounding uses and not infringe on the ability of these uses to operate in the future. Staff have also analyzed other allowable uses in the MP zone and determined that the proposed medical services use will be compatible and not infringe on the ability of adjacent property owners to develop their properties consistent with the MP zone in the future. The proposed rezone will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare
.

Summary of Planning Commission Meeting

The project was heard by the City's Planning Commission on August 8, 2024. The applicant addressed the Commission, spoke in favor of the project, and requested approval by the Commission. No public testimony was received at the hearing. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to adopt the WellSpace Health Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approve the CUP, DRPMOD, and AP entitlements, as well as recommend that the City Council approve the requested Rezone.

Public Outreach

The proposed project was distributed to all internal and external agencies and departments who have requested such notice, and all comments have been incorporated into the project, as appropriate. Early notification of the project was posted on the Roseville Coalition of Neighborhood Associations (RCONA)’s website.

Notices of both the Planning Commission hearing and the City Council hearing were published in the Roseville Press Tribune and on the RCONA website, and mailed to all property owners and residents within a 300 foot radius of the project site. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any public comments regarding the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
Application costs were borne by the applicant, and the project is required to pay all applicable impact fees. The project is not anticipated to result in negative impacts on the City’s General Fund. In fact, the beneficial reuse of the facility as a medical use is expected to have a positive fiscal impact to the City.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Roseville, acting as Lead Agency, prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to evaluate the environmental effects of the project. The document was released for a 20-day public comment period, which began on July 17, 2024 and ended on August 6, 2024. The document analyzed the potential for environmental impacts due to project implementation and determined that potentially significant impacts related to Tribal Cultural Resources could be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation. Prior to approval of the Conditional Use Permit, Design Review Permit Modification, and Administrative Permit entitlements, the Planning Commission adopted the IS/MND. The Planning Commission report and all exhibits are included in Attachment 2.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 - PC Staff Report
Exhibit A -
Rezone Exhibit
Ordinance No.

South
Pac
ificRailroa
d
65 S outh
P ac ific R
ailr o
ad
DryCreek
80 80
80 80
106
Dry C ree k
80 Vicinity Map
Maxar, Microsoft, Nearmap, Esri Community Maps
Contributors, City of Roseville, County of Sacramento,
California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/
NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS,
Placer Parcel
<all other values>
Roseville
Roseville Parcel
8/22/2024, 4:07:45 PM
0 0.04 0.080.02 mi
0 0.07 0.130.03 km
1:2,257
City of Roseville - Development Services
City of Roseville | Development Services
CC ATTACHMENT 1
Planning Division Staff Report
Planning Commission Meeting August 8, 2024
Prepared by: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
ITEM 6.1: Rezone, Conditional Use Permit, Design Review Permit Modification, and Administrative Permit – 100 Stonehouse Court – INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health – File #PL24-0330

REQUEST
The project is a request for a rezone of the 1.56- acre property from Industrial/Business Park to Community Commercial/Special Area to allow medical services with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project also includes a Conditional Use Permit, to allow WellSpace Health to operate a medical clinic on the site, a Design Review Permit Modification to modify the exterior of the building and add site accessibility improvements. An Administrative Permit for a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use is also requested.

Appli
cant – Andi Panagopoulos, Cunningham Engineering
Property Owner – Jonathan Porteus, PhD, WellSpace Health

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
The Planni
ng Division recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions:

1. Adopt
the WellSpace Health Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program;

2. Recommend the City Council adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the Rezone;

3. Adopt the three (3) findings of fact and approve the Conditional Use Permit subject to five (5) conditions of approval;

4. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the Design Review Permit Modification subject to six (6) conditions of approval; and

5. Adopt the three (3) findings of fact and approve the Administrative Permit subject to four (4 ) conditions of approval.

SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES
There are no outstanding issues associated with this request. The applicant has reviewed and is in agreement with all recommended conditions of approval.

BACKGROUND
The project site is located on Parcel 198 within the City’s Infill area at the southeast corner of Stonehouse Court and Taylor Road. The site has a zoning designation of Industrial/Business Park (MP) and a land use designation of Community Commercial (CC). On January 20, 1983, the Project Review Commission approved a Site Review Permit (SR 82- 50) to allow Placer County Welfare to develop a 15,998 square foot, single-story office building and a ssociated parking, landscaping, and lighting. The purpose of the office building was to house the Placer County Welfare and Mental Health Departments. In August 2011 the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a Community Assembly use to locate within the existing office building (file #2011PL-053). The church subsequently modified the building to accommodate the assembly use in 2013 and occupied the property until 2020. The Yugoslavian 7th Day Adventist Church was the most recent tenant until 2023. The building is currently vacant.

CC ATTACHMENT 2
INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health
File #PL24-0330
Planning Commission – August 8, 2024 – Page 2 of 8

PROJCECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is a request
for a rezone of the 1.56- acre
property from MP to Community
Commercial/Special Area (CC/SA)
to allow medical services with
approval of a CUP. The project also
includes a CUP, to allow WellSpace
Health Placer Community Health
Center to operate a medical clinic
on the site. In addition, the applicant
requests a Design Review Permit
Modification (DRPMOD) to modify
the exterior of the building and site
accessibility improvements, and an
Administrative Permit (AP) for a
parking reduction of six (6) spaces
to allow the medical office use.

EVALUATION – REZONE
Zoning Ordinance Section 19.86.050 specifies that recommendations for approval or denial of a rezone shall include consideration of the proposed amendment’s consistency with:

1. The public interest, health, safety, or welfare of the City, and;

2. The General Plan of the City of Roseville.

The existing General Plan land use designation of the property is CC, and the existing zoning designation of the property is MP. The project site is not within a Specific Plan area. Medical Services are not an allowed use in the MP zone. The applicant proposes to change the zoning designation of the parcel from MP to CC/SA to allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site with the approval of a CUP (see Exhibit B for a list of allowable uses in the proposed CC/SA zone).

The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan land use for the site (Exhibit C). The City of Roseville General Plan provides a list of compatible “Implementing Zones” for each land use designation (General Plan Table II- 10), which establishes what zoning designations are considered compatible with the applicable General Plan land use designation. The CC zone district is considered implementing zones for the CC land use; however, the MP zone is compatible with the Light Industrial (LI), General Industrial (IND), or the Tech/Business Park (T/BP) land use designation. According to Section 19.14.010 of the Zoning Ordinance, the MP zone is intended to “designate areas appropriate for the development of a mixture of light industrial, office and commercial land uses”. In comparison, the CC zone is intended to “serve the principal retail shopping needs of the entire community by providing areas for shopping centers, and other retail and service uses.” The proposed CC/SA zoning designation of the project site will be consistent with the City’s General Plan.

The project site is located in an area along Taylor Road with a range of uses from typical commercial (e.g. restaurant), to more intense commercial ( e.g. RV sales and repair) , to heavy commercial/light industrial (e.g. autobody repair and paint). The existing surrounding uses are either principally permitted (e.g. restaurant), or conditionally permitted (e.g. RV sales and autobody repair/painting) in the CC zone.

Rezoning the project site to CC/SA in order to allow for medical services will be compatible with the existing surrounding uses and not infringe on the ability of these uses to operate in the future. Staff have Figure 1: Project Location
Project Site

INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health
File #PL24-0330
Planning Commission – August 8, 2024 – Page 3 of 8

also analyzed other allowable uses in the MP zone and determined that the proposed medical services use will be compatible and not infringe on the ability of adjacent property owners to develop their properties consistent with the MP zone in the future. The proposed rezone will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare.

EVALUATION – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The evaluation of the CUP will focus on the compatibility of the medical services with the surrounding land uses. The CUP allows the City to place operational conditions on the use which may be modified by the Planning Commission. Section 19.78.60 of the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance requires that three findings be made to approve a CUP. The three findings are listed below in bold, italicized text and are followed by an evaluation in relation to each finding.

1. The proposed use or development is consistent with the City of Roseville General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The land use designation for the subject property is CC. The purpose of the CC land use category is to provide a broader range of goods and services to an expanded service area. Primary uses within the CC land use category include retail stores and businesses selling a full range of goods and services. The project is located within an Infill area of the City and is not subject to a Specific Plan; therefore, this evaluation is based on the General Plan land use designation. The Zoning Ordinance states that General Medical Services are permitted in the CC zone, however, a Special Area overlay (SA) zone is proposed to allow medical services with approval of a CUP . The CUP will ensure the proposed use is compatible with the uses in the surrounding MP zone. Based on the General Plan definition for CC land use and the Zoning Ordinance provisions, the proposed project is consistent with the land use designation with approval of the required CUP.

2. The proposed use or development conforms with all applicable standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.

The property has a zoning designation of MP. Medical services are not an allowed use within the MP zoning district. However, the proposed CC/SA zoning would allow medical services with approval of a CUP. The CUP allows the Planning Commission the opportunity to review the project’s compatibility with uses in the project area. The proposed use will be contained within an existing building, therefore, the Zoning Ordinance standards related to building height and setbacks are not applicable. However, the use will be subject to the Zoning Ordinance parking standards . A General Medical Service use requires 1 space per 150 sq. ft. of floor area. WellSpace Health proposes to occupy 15,726 square-feet of the existing church building for medical services (e.g., dental and medical offices) . Based on the proposed floor plan the project requires a total of 105 parking stalls. The site is short six (6) parking stalls, therefore, the applicant proposes a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use. A more detailed evaluation of the parking reduction is provided below.

3. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed use or development is compatible with and shall not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons residing or working in the area, or be detrimental or injurious to public or private property or improvements.

The project site is within the City’s Infill area and is surrounded by urban uses. WellSpace proposes to occupy the existing 15,726-square-foot building and make exterior and interior modifications. The site is developed with an existing office building which was previously occupied by a religious institution, Yugoslavian 7
th Day Adventist Church, up until 2023. Prior to Yugoslavian 7th Day Adventist Church, the building was occupied by Placer County Welfare and Mental Health Department. The original user of the building occupied the space from approximately 1982 until 2013, during that time no complaints were received, or issues raised by the surrounding commercial tenants and/or residences nearby. The project site is located at the end of Stonehouse Court. Stonehouse Court is a public street currently only being INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health
File #PL24-0330
Planning Commission – August 8, 2024 – Page 4 of 8

used by the project site. It is anticipated that the future tenant of the northern parcel will also use Stonehouse Court as a main road for their business, however, future driveways will be determined by the site design of the future project. Currently, the only vehicular access into the project site is off Stonehouse Court. Based on the location of the current project site and its distance from the closest residence (approximately 500-feet across Union Pacific Railroad tracks), staff does not anticipate the new user to have any impacts to the surrounding area since the proposed use is similar to the original tenant of the building.

As described in Attachment 1 (Operations Plan & Parking Reduction), WellSpace proposes to operate Monday through Friday from 8:30 am to 5:30 pm, which differs from the hours of operation from the previous tenant. The facility will operate similar to a medical office building with a consistent and steady parking demand throughout the day. Whereas the previous tenant used the facility throughout the week, but most of their parking demand occurred on the weekends, specifically during their morning worship services. Given that the proposed use is within an enclosed building, and the business will only be conducted during daytime hours, Staff does not anticipate any impacts to surrounding businesses.

Therefore, staff is confident the use will not be materially detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the area.

EVALUATION – DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT MODIFICATION
The evaluation of the Design Review Permit Modification has been based on the applicable development and design standards within the City’s Zoning Ordinance, the General Plan, and the City’s Community Design Guidelines. Section 19.78.060(J) of the Zoning Ordinance requires two findings of fact be made in order to approve a Design Review Permit Modification. The required findings are listed below in italicized, bold print and are followed by an evaluation.

1. The proposed modification is substantially consistent with the intent of the original approval.

2. The proposed modification is in compliance with all standards and requirements of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, with the applicable goals, policies and objectives set forth in the General Plan, and the applicable Community Design Guidelines
The evaluation of the Design Review Permit Modification has been based on the original approval and the applicable development and design standards within the City’s Zoning Ordinance and the Community Design Guidelines (CDG). Staff reviewed the proposed project for consistency with all applicable standards and found the project to be consistent with the relevant requirements and guidelines. The proposed modifications are discussed and evaluated below.

Architecture: WellSpace proposes to modify the north building elevation by adding two (2) new main building entryways and modifying the roof to accommodate the entryways (Figure 2 & 3). The new entries will extend from the existing building but would not add additional square footage to the building floor plan. Façade improvements to the north building elevation include replacing the exterior finish with cement plaster and adding new awnings. Some existing windows are proposed for removal while additional doors are proposed throughout the facility to comply with Building Code requirements.

INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health
File #PL24-0330
Planning Commission – August 8, 2024 – Page 5 of 8

Figure 2: Existing North Building Elevation

Figure 3: Proposed North Building Elevation

Site Plan: In addition to the proposed architectur al modifications the applicant proposes site improvements to accommodate a new trash enclosure and other parking lot improvements. Site improvements include but are not limited to re-paving and re-striping the parking stalls on the north and western sides of the existing building. The new parking stalls would meet the City’s Zoning Ordinance standards and Community Design Guidelines for parking areas.

Per City standards a new trash enclosure is proposed at the southeast corner of the site. The new trash enclosure design, location and access complies with the specifications established by the City’s Improvement Standards and was reviewed by the City’s Engineering Division. Further, the enclosure materials and colors will match the existing trash enclosure colors and materials.

Finally, the applicant proposes adding new drought tolerant/low water use shrubs and ground cover to comply with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) throughout the site. Due to the minimal site improvements proposed with this project, the applicant found that only 43% of the parking lot would be shaded with the existing tree canopy and the new proposed landscape improvements. As mentioned above the existing building and parking lot was approved by the City in 1983, and at that time met all the development standards. In addition, there is an existing power line corridor which traverses the western property line. The existing easement will not permit trees to be planted within this area. Given these constraints and the fact the applicant is adding additional trees where permitted, Staff finds the proposed landscape plan acceptable.

In summary, the proposed modifications are in substantial compliance with the intent of the original approval, and the modifications comply with the applicable goals, policies, and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance, the General Plan, and the CDG. As such, staff supports the project modifications as outlined above.

EVALUATION – ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT FOR A PARKING REDUCTION Section 19.26.030(C)(3) of the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance contains provisions for requesting and evaluating parking reductions. It states that when an application for a parking reduction is filed, the applicant has the burden of proof for providing documentation substantiating the request. Reduced

INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health
File #PL24-0330
Planning Commission – August 8, 2024 – Page 6 of 8

parking shall only be approved by the Approving Authority if two (2) criteria can be met. The required criteria are listed below in italics and are followed by an evaluation. a) Satisfactory evidence is provided describing the nature of the use, the operation and data from other facilities or similar facilities so as to demonstrate that the required parking standards are excessive and the proposed parking standards are appropriate; and As previously mentioned above, a General Medical Service use requires 1 space per 150 sq. ft. of floor area. WellSpace Health proposes to occupy 15,726 square-feet of the existing office building for medical services (e.g., dental and medical offices). Based on the proposed floor plan the project requires a total of 105 parking stalls. The project site is short six (6) parking stalls. However, according to the business operation plan (Attachment 1), the facility will include primary care, obstetrics, dental, and behavioral health services Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:30 am and 5:30 pm. The facility will employee approximately 50 employees daily and patient visits will average 150 per day. Due to the types of services being provided throughout the day, the staggering of appointments, and virtual appointments, it is not anticipated that a shortage of parking will occur throughout the day. WellSpace Health anticipates that during peak demand (i.e., opening, lunch, closing), up to 30 patients may be served per hour. Minimal impact is anticipated at the project site due to the ample parking provided on-site and the number of staff and visitors predicted to utilize the facility.

The Operation Plan & Parking Reduction outlines the proposed hours of operation and the number of patients to be seen during peak demand . Based on other facilities throughout the region, WellSpace forecasts that 150 patient visits per day will occur at the project site. It is anticipated during most operating hours approximately 10-12 patients are served per hour in- person or virtually via telehealth. Similarly, WellSpace Health has found through their other facilities that many of its patrons use alternative modes of transportation (i.e. bus service, carpool, or Dial-a-Ride), which would reduce the number of parking spaces being occupied throughout the day. Should parking become an issue the applicant has also noted that additional parking spaces are available along Stonehouse Court. b) Overflow parking will not impact any adjacent use.

As previously mentioned, the site is located at the end of Stonehouse Court which dead ends at the vacant MP parcel located at 2024 Taylor Road. Due to the site’s location Staff does not anticipate any overflow parking to encroach within the adjacent commercial business to the south of the project site.

Should parking become an issue, additional parking is available along Stonehouse Court. Based on the analysis above and the provided documentation substantiating the parking reduction Staff does not anticipate parking to become an issue.

PUBLIC OUTREACH
The proposed project was distributed to all internal and external agencies and departments who have requested such notice, and all comments or recommended conditions of approval have been incorporated into the project, as appropriate. Early notification of the project was posted on the Roseville Coalition of Neighborhood Associations (RCONA)’s website. A notice of the public hearing was published in the Roseville Press Tribune on July 26, 2024, and a notice of the hearing was also distributed to all property owners within 300 feet of the site and posted on the RCONA website. No comments have been received as of publication of the staff report.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Roseville, acting as Lead Agency, prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to evaluate the environmental effects of the project. The document was released for a 20-day public comment period, which began on July 17, 2024 and ends on August 6, 2024. The document analyzed the potential for environmental INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health
File #PL24-0330
Planning Commission – August 8, 2024 – Page 7 of 8

impacts due to project implementation and determined that potentially significant impacts related to Tribal Cultural Resources could be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are included as Exhibit A.

RECOMMENDATION

The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions:

1. Adopt the WellSpace Health Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program;

2. Recommend the City Council adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the Rezone;

3. Adopt the three (3) findings of fact and approve the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – 100 STONEHOUSE COURT – INFILL PCL 198 – WELLSPACE HEALTH – FILE #PL24-0 330 subject to five (5) conditions of approval;

4. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT MODIFICATION – 100 STONEHOUSE COURT – INFILL PCL 198 – WELLSPACE HEALTH – FILE #PL24-0330 subject to six (6) conditions of approval; and

5. Adopt the three (3) findings of fact and approve the ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT – 100 STONEHOUSE COURT – INFILL PCL 198 – WELLSPACE HEALTH – FILE #PL24-0330 subject to four (4) conditions of approval.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, FILE #24-0330

1. This Conditional Use Permit approval shall be effectuated within a period of two (2) years from August 8, 2024 and if not effectuated shall expire on August 8, 2026. Prior to said expiration date, the applicant may apply for an extension of time, provided this approval does not extend the expiration beyond August 8, 2027. (Planning)

2. The Conditional Use Permit shall not be deemed approved until the actions on the Rezone are approved and become effective. (Planning)

3. The project is approved as identified and described in Attachment 1, and as conditioned or modified below. Any modifications to the operation plan (Attachment 1) shall require approval of a Conditional Use Permit Modification. (Planning)

4. The business hours of operation shall be limited to 8:30 am to 5: 30 pm Monday through Friday . (Planning)

5. A building permit must be issued by the City’s Building Division prior to commencement of any interior building improvements and occupancy of the building. (Building) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT MODIFICATION, FILE #24-0330

1. This Design Review Permit modification approval shall be effectuated within a period of two (2) years from August 8, 2024 and if not effectuated shall expire on August 8, 2026. Prior to said expiration date, the applicant may apply for an extension of time, provided this approval does not extend the expiration beyond August 8, 2027. (Planning)
INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health
File #PL24-0330
Planning Commission – August 8, 2024 – Page 8 of 8

2. The Design Review Permit Modification shall not be deemed approved until the actions on the Rezone are approved and become effective. (Planning)

3. The project is approved as shown in Exhibits D and as conditioned or modified below. (Planning)

4. The project is subject to the previously approved conditions of approval for the Placer County Welfare Building file SR 82-50, except as conditioned or modified below. (Planning)

5. The project shall comply with all required environmental mitigation identified in the WellSpace Health Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (included as Exhibit A) and shall include all applicable mitigation measures as notes on the grading plans. (Planning)

6. Bike parking and electric vehicle parking spaces shall be provided per the California Green Building Standards. Carpool spaces shall also be provided per the City of Roseville’s Transportation System Management (TSM) Ordinance, R.M.C Chapter 11.33. Bike rack/locker design and designated parking space markings and location shall be approved by Alternative Transportation. (Alternative Transportation, Building)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT, FILE #24-0330

1. This Administrative Permit for a reduction of six (6) spaces is approved based on the proposed business operation as described in Attachment 1, and as conditioned below. Should the use vacate the space or modify operations, the parking reduction will no longer be valid. (Planning)

2. This Administrative Permit approval shall be effectuated within a period of two (2) years from August 8, 2024 and if not effectuated shall expire on August 8, 2026. Prior to said expiration date, the applicant may apply for an extension of time. (Planning)

3. The Administrative Permit shall not be deemed approved until the actions on the Rezone are approved and become effective. (Planning)

4. The applicant shall submit plans to the Building Division and secure a building permit for any proposed tenant improvements. (Building)

ATTACHMENTS

1. WellSpace Health Operation Plan & Parking Reduction

EXHIBITS
A. WellSpace Health Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration B. Community Commercial/Special Area Use Table
C. Rezone exhibit
D. Plans

Note to Applicant and/or Developer: Please contact Planning Division staff at (916) 774-5276 prior to the Commission meeting if you have any questions on any of the recommended conditions for your project. If you challenge the decision of the Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you or someone else raised at the public hearing held for this project, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Manager at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Executive Office: 1500 Expo Parkway | Sacramento, CA 95815 | wellspacehealth.org March 6, 2024
Department of Development Services
City of Roseville
311 Vernon St.

Roseville, CA 95678
Re:

Operational Statement for Proposed Medical and Dental Office Building Site
Details: Existing 16,128 sqft. building
Project Address: 100 Stonehouse Court
APN: 015-162-006
Property Size: 1.69AC/73,669 sqft.

General Plan: CC Community Commercial
Current Zoning: MP Industrial/Business Park
Proposed Zoning: SA Special Area
Current Use: Church (Tenant/Lease)
Proposed Use: Medical and Dental Office
Proje
ct Description
The
proposed project consists of the interior and exterior remodeling of the existing building.

This facility will include primary care, obstetrics, dental, and behavioral health services.

No patients will be rendered unconscious or sedated at any time and all services will be outpatient only.

The
facility will employ approximately 50 employees daily and patient visits will average 150 per day. Hours of Operation – Monday through Friday from 8:30 am – 5:30 pm.

The
number of patients served in any given hour will be impacted by service type, service intensity, and patient scheduling demands. Through WellSpace Health’s operation of 30+ centers throughout the region, it has forecasted 150 visits per day with variance between peak demand and regular demand. WellSpace anticipates approximately 5 hours per day of regular demand, where 10-20 patients are served per hour in-person with additional patients served virtually via telehealth. During peak demand (Opening, Lunch, Closing), up to 30 patients may be served per hour. WellSpace does not anticipate serving more than 30 patients at a time during any given hour of the day.

PC ATTACHMENT 1

2 It is anticipated that patients, the vast majority of whom live at or below the federal poverty line, will access care via multi-modal transportation, including private vehicle, public transit, and walking/biking.

For patients accessing care via public transit, the project is located .7 miles from Roseville Transit’s Local Route B, Bus Stop 17, located at E. Roseville Pkwy. at Taylor Road. Local Route B operates Monday–Friday with service every 30 minutes, 6:10 a.m. – 6:40 p.m., and hourly thereafter until 9:43 p.m., all of which are within the projects operating hours. From Bus Stop 17, its a 15-minute walk or 4 minute bike ride (all Roseville Transit buses accommodate two bikes) down Taylor Road to the project site at 100 Stonehouse Court. For patients who require a more direct public transit option, Roseville Transit offers Arrow, an on-demand direct service public transit offering for as little as $2.50 per ride within the city limits. Arrow vehicles are ADA equipped and also serve as Paratransit vehicles.

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given that, as Lead Agency, the City of Roseville, Development Services Department, Planning Division has prepared an Initial Study leading to a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project referenced below. This Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review and comment.

Project Title/File#: INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health; File #PL24-0330 Project Address: 100 Stonehouse Court, Roseville, CA 95678 (APN 015-162-006-000) Project Applicant: Andi Panagopoulos, Cunningham Engineering Project Owner: Jonathan Porteus, PhD, WellSpace Health
Project Planner: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
Project Description: The proposed project is a request for a rezone of the 1.56 -acre property from Industrial/Business Park to Community Commercial/Special Area to allow medical services with approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The project also includes a CUP, to allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site, a Design Review Permit Modification (DRPMOD) to modify the exterior of the building and site accessibility improvements, and an Administrative Permit (AP) for a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use.

The project site is not identified on any list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5
Document Review and Availability: The public review and comment period begins on July 17, 2024 and ends on August 6, 2024. The Mitigated Negative Declaration may be reviewed online at: https://www.roseville.ca.us/environmentaldocuments
(under Private Development Projects).

Written comments on the adequacy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration may be submitted to Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner at [email protected] or in person at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (Monday —Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), and must be received no later than 5:00 pm on August 6, 2024.

This project will be scheduled for a public hearing before the City’s Planning Commission. At this hearing, the Planning Commission will consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated project entitlements. Separate notices will be published when the hearing is scheduled. Dated: J
uly 15, 2024
Mike Isom
Development Services Director
Publis
h: July 17, 2024

PC EXHIBIT A

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title/File Number: INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health; File #PL24-0330 Project Location: 100 Stonehouse Court, Roseville, Placer County, CA 95678 (APN 015-162-006-000)
Project Applicant: Andi Panagopoulos, Cunningham Engineering; (916) 455-2026; 2120 20th Street, Suite 3, Sacramento CA 95818
Property Owner: Jonathan Porteus, PhD , WellSpace Health; (916) 469 -4690; 1500 Expo Parkway, Sacramento CA 95815
Lead Agency Contact Person: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner - City of Roseville; (916) 774-5247 Date: July 17, 2024
Project Description:

The proposed project is a request for a rezone of the 1.56 -acre property from Industrial/Business Park to Community Commercial/Special Area to allow medical services with approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The project also includes a CUP, to allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site, a Design Review Permit Modification to modify the exterior of the building and site accessibility improvements, and an Administrative Permit for a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use.

DECLARATION
The Planning Manager has determined that the above project will not have significant effects on the environment and therefore does not require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. The determination is based on the attached initial study and the following findings:

A. The project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub stantially reduce the habitat o f fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.

B. The project will not have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals.

C. The project will not have impacts, which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.

D. The project will not have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

E. No substantial evidence exists that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.

F. The project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures identified in the attached initial study.

G. This Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT – PLANNING DIVISION
311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774-5276 ~J
ROsE'VILLE

CALIFORNIA
Last Revised March 2019
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT–PLANNING DIVISION

311 Vernon St, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774-5276

INITIAL STUDY & ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST

Project Title/File Number: INFILL PCL 198 – WellSpace Health; File #PL24-0330

Project Location: 100 Stonehouse Court, Roseville, Placer County, CA 95678 (APN 015-162-006-000)

Project Description: The proposed project is a request for a rezone of the 1.56-acre property from Industrial/Business Park (MP) to Community Commercial/Special Area (CC/SA) to allow medical services with approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The project also includes a CUP, to allow WellSpace Health Placer
Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site, a Design Review Permit Modification ( DRPMOD) to modify the exterior of the building and site accessibility improvements, and an Administrative Permit (AP) for a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use.

Project Applicant: Andi Panagopoulos, Cunningham Engineering; (916) 455-2026; 2120 20th Street, Suite 3, Sacramento CA 95818

Property Owner: Jonathan Porteus, PhD , WellSpace Health; (916) 469 -4690; 1500 Expo Parkway, Sacramento CA 95815

Lead Agency Contact: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner – City of Roseville; (916) 774- 5247

This initial study has been prepared to identify and assess the anticipated environmental impacts of the above described project application. The document relies on the approved 2035 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GP EIR), which analyzed the impacts of full buildout of the City’s General Plan land uses and implementation of its policies consistent with the General Plan. Where documents were submitted by consultants working for the applicant, City staff reviewed such documents in order to determine whether, based on their own professional judgment and expertise, staff found such documents to be credible and persuasive. Staff has only relied on documents that reflect their independent judgment, and has not accepted at face value representations made by consultants for the applicant.

This document has been prepared to satisfy the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.). CEQA requires that all state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority before acting on those projects.

The initial study is a public document used by the decision-making lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment. If the lead agency finds substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may have a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial, the lead agency is required to prepare an EIR. If the agency finds no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment, a negative declaration shall be prepared. If in the course of analysis, the agency recognizes that the project may have a significant impact on the environment, but that by incorporating specific mitigation measures to which the applicant agrees, the impact will be reduced to a less than significant effect, a mitigated negative declaration shall be prepared. ~,
ROsE~lLLE

CALIFORNIA

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 2 of 42 ends

Table of Contents
Project Description …………………………………………………………………………………… 3

City of Roseville Mitigation Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards ……………………………. 4

Other Environmental Documents Relied Upon …………………………………………………….. 5

Explanation of Initial Study Checklist ........................................................................................ 5

Initial Study Checklist
I. Aesthetics ……………………………………………. 6
II. Agricultural & Forestry Resources ………………….. 8
III. Air Quality ……………………………………………. 9
IV. Biological Resources ………………………………… 12
V. Cultural Resources ………………………………….. 15
VI. Energy ……………………………………………….. 16
VII. Geology and Soils ………………………………….. 17
VIII. Greenhouse Gases ………………………………….. 20
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ………………….. 22
X. Hydrology and Water Quality ………………………… 25
XI. Land Use and Planning ……………………………… 27
XII. Mineral Resources …………………………………… 28
XIII. Noise …………………………………………………. 29
XIV. Population and Housing ……………………………... 30
XV. Public Services ……………………………………….. 31
XVI. Recreation …………………………………………… 32
XVII. Transportation ……………………………………… 33
XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources ……………………………. 35
XIX. Utilities and Service Systems ………………………… 37
XX. Wildfire ……………………………………………………. 39
XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ………………….. 40

Environmental Determination …………………………………………………………………….. 42

Attachments ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 42

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 3 of 42 ends

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Location
The project site is located on Parcel 198 of the City’s Infill area (see Figure 1). The property is 1.56 acres and has an address of 100 Stonehouse Court (APN 015-162-006-000).

Figure 1: Project Site

Background
Location Zoning General Plan Land Use Actual Use of Property Site Industrial/Business Park (MP) Community Commercial (CC) Church North MP CC Vacant
South MP CC Automotive repair
East MP CC Vacant
West General Industrial (M2) Industrial (IND) Union Pacific Railroad

Project Site

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 4 of 42 ends

Environmental Setting
The site is currently developed with a 15,998 square foot building occupied by a religious institution. The site has a zoning designation of Industrial/Business Park (MP) and a General Plan land use designation of Community Commercial (CC). The project site is within the City’s Infill area and is surrounded by urban uses, has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species as the site has been previously graded and disturbed, and the site is currently served by all required utilities and public services. The site is bounded by Stonehouse Court to the north, a vacant parcel to the east, an automotive use to the south, and a 0.50 -acre landscape strip to the west. The site is developed with an existing building, surface parking, lighting, and landscaping improvements. Curb and gutter improvements exist along the northern perimeter of the site.

Sidewalks are fully constructed along Stonehouse Court.

Proposed Project
The proposed project (Project) is a request for a rezone of the 1.56- acre property from MP to C ommunity Commercial/Special Area (CC/SA) to allow medical services with approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP).

The project also includes a CUP to allow WellSpace Health Placer Community Health Center to operate a medical clinic on the site, a Design Review Permit Modification to modify the exterior of the building and site accessibility improvements, and an Administrative Permit for a parking reduction of six (6) spaces to allow the medical office use.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE MITIGATION ORDINANCES, GUIDELINES, AND STANDARDS For projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified, CEQA Guidelines section 15183(f) allows a lead agency to rely on previously adopted development policies or standards as mitigation for the environmental effects, when the standards have been adopted by the City, with findings based on substantial evidence, that the policies or standards will substantially mitigate environmental effects, unless substantial new information shows otherwise (CEQA Guidelines §151 83(f)). The City of Roseville adopted CEQA Implementing Procedures (Implementing Procedures) which are consistent with this CEQA Guidelines section. The current version of the Implementing Procedures were adopted in April 2008 (Resolution 08-172), along with Findings of Fact, and were updated in January 2021 ( Resolution 21- 018). The below regulations and ordinances were found to provide uniform mitigating policies and standards, and are applicable to development projects. The City’s Mitigating Policies and Standards are referenced, where applicable, in the Initial Study Checklist. • Noise Regulation (RMC Ch.9.24)
• Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (RMC Ch.9.80)
• Traffic Mitigation Fee (RMC Ch.4.44)
• Drainage Fees (Dry Creek [RMC Ch.4.49] and Pleasant Grove Creek [RMC Ch.4.48]) • City of Roseville Improvement Standards (Resolution 02-37 and as further amended) • City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards (Resolution 01-208 and as further amended) • Tree Preservation Ordinance (RMC Ch.19.66)
• Internal Guidance for Management of Tribal Cultural Resources and Consultation (Tribal C onsultation Policy) (Resolution 20-294)
• Subdivision Ordinance (RMC Title 18)
• Community Design Guidelines
• Specific Plan Design Guidelines:
o Development Guidelines Del Webb Specific Plan
o Landscape Design Guidelines for North Central Roseville Specific Plan

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 5 of 42 ends

o North Roseville Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Northeast Roseville Specific Plan (Olympus Pointe) Signage Guidelines o North Roseville Area Design Guidelines
o Northeast Roseville Specific Plan Landscape Design Guidelines o Southeast Roseville Specific Plan Landscape Design Guidelines o Stoneridge Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Highland Reserve North Specific Plan and Design Guidelines o West Roseville Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Sierra Vista Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Creekview Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
• City of Roseville 2035 General Plan

OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON
• 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report, certified August 5, 2020 (https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/one.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8774544) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, any project which is consistent with the development densities established by zoning, a Community Plan, or a General Plan for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as may be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The 2035 General Plan Update EIR (General Plan EIR) updated all Citywide analyses, including for vehicle miles traveled, greenhouse gas emissions , water supply, water treatment, wastewater treatment, and waste disposal. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted land use designations examined within the environmental documents listed above, and thus this Initial Study focuses on effects particular to the specific project site, impacts which were not analyzed within the EIR, and impacts which may require revisiting due to substantial new information. When applicable, the topical sections within the Initial Study summarize the findings within the environmental documents listed above. The analysis, supporting technical materials, and findings of the environmental document are incorporated by reference, and are available for review at the Civic Center, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA.

EXPLANATION OF INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines recommend that lead agencies use an Initial Study Checklist to determine potential impacts of the proposed project on the physical environment. The Initial Study Checklist provides a list of questions concerning a comprehensive array of environmental issue areas potentially affected by this project. This section of the Initial Study incorporates a portion of Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form, contained in the CEQA Guidelines. Within each topical section (e.g. Air Quality) a description of the setting is provided, followed by the checklist responses, thresholds used, and finally a discussion of each checklist answer.

There are four (4) possible answers to the Environmental Impacts Checklist on the following pages. Each possible answer is explained below:
1) A “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from the information that a fair argument based on substantial evidence can be made to

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 6 of 42 ends

support a conclusion that a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change may occur to any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project. When one or more “Potentially significant Impact” entries are made, an EIR is required.
2) A “ Less Than Significant With Mitigation” answer is appropriate when the lead agency incorporates mitigation measures to reduce an impact from “Potentially Significant” to “Less than Significant.” For example, floodwater impacts could be reduced from a potentially -significant level to a less -than- significant level by relocating a building to an area outside of the floodway. The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less-than-significant level. Mitigation measures are identified as MM followed by a number. 3) A “Less Than significant Impact” answer is appropriate if there is evidence that one or more environmental impacts may occur, but the impacts are determined to be less than significant, or the application of development policies and standards to the project will reduce the impact(s) to a less -than-significant level. For instance, the application of the City’s Improvement Standards reduces potential erosion impacts to a less-than-significant level.
4) A “No Impact” answer is appropriate where it can be demonstrated that the impact does not have the potential to adversely affect the environment. For instance, a project in the center of an urbanized area with no agricultural lands on or adjacent to the project area clearly would not have an adverse effect on agricultural resources or operations. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources cited in the Initial Study. Where a “No Impact” answer is adequately supported by the informat ion sources cited in the Initial Study , further narrative explanation is not required. A “No Impact” answer is explained when it is based on project - specific factors as well as generous standards.

All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off - and on-site, indirect, direct, construction, and operation impacts, except as provided for under State CEQA Guidelines.

INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
I. Aesthetics
The Project is located in an urbanized setting within an industrial zoned area of the City. Public views of the Project site are from Taylor Road, Stonehouse Court, and Interstate 80.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
X
b) Substantially damage
scenic resources,
including, but not limited
to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state
scenic highway?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 7 of 42 ends

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
c) In non-urbanized area,
substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of public views of
the site and its
surroundings? (Public
views are those that are
experienced from a
publicly accessible
vantage point.) If the
project is in an urbanized
area, would the project
conflict with applicable
zoning and other
regulations governing
scenic quality?
X
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare,
which would adversely
affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of an environmental impact cannot always be determined through the use of a specific, quantifiable threshold. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b) affirms this by the statement “an ironclad definition of significant effect is not always possible because the significance of an activity may vary with the setting.” This is particularly true of aesthetic impacts. As an example, a proposed parking lot in a dense urban center would have markedly different visual effects than a parking lot in an open space area. For the purpose of this study, the significance thresholds are as stated in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, as shown in a– d of the checklist below. The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the Zoning Ordinance (e.g. building height, setbacks, etc), Subdivision Ordinance (RMC Ch. 18), Community Design Guidelines (Resolution 95-347), and applicable Specific Plan Policies and/or Specific Plan Design Guidelines will prevent significant impacts in urban settings as it relates to items a, b, and c, below.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b) There are no designated or eligible scenic vistas or scenic highways within or adjacent to the City of Roseville.
c) The project site is in an urban setting, and as a result lacks any prominent or high-quality natural features which could be negatively impacted by development. The City of Roseville has adopted Community Design Guidelines (CDG) for the purpose of creating building and community designs which are a visual asset to the community. The CDG includes guidelines for building design, site design and landscape design, which will result in a project that enhances the existing urban visual environment . The project does not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality . Accordingly, the aesthetic impacts of the project are less than significant.
d) The project involves nighttime lighting to provide for the security and safety of project users. However, the project is already located within an urbanized setting with many existing lighting sources. Lighting is conditioned

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 8 of 42 ends

to comply with City standards (i.e. CDG) to limit the height of light standards and to require cut-off lenses and glare shields to minimize light and glare impacts. The project will not create a new source of substantial light. None of the project elements are highly reflective, and thus the project will not contribute to an increased source of glare.

II. Agricultural & Forestry Resources
The State Department of Conservation oversees the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, which was established to document the location, quality, and quantity of agricultural lands, and the conversion of those lands over time. The primary land use classifications on the maps generated through this program are: Urban and Built Up Land, Grazing Land, Farmland of Local Importance, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Prime Farmland. According to the current California Department of Conservation Placer County Important Farmland Map (2012), the majority of the City of Roseville is designated as Urban and Built Up Land and most of the open space areas of the City are designated as Grazing Land. There are a few areas designated as Farmland of Local Importance and two small areas designated as Unique Farmland located on the western side of the City along Baseline Road. The current Williamson Act Contract map (2013/2014) produced by the Department of Conservation shows that there are no Williamson Act contracts within the City, and only one (on PFE Road) that is adjacent to the City. None of the land within the City is considered forest land by the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
X
b) Conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural use,
or a Williamson Act
contract?
X
c) Conflict with existing
zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public
Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public
Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as
defined by Government
Code section 51104(g))?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 9 of 42 ends

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
d) Result in the loss of forest
land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest
use?
X
e) Involve other changes in
the existing environment
which, due to their location
or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Prime Farmland are called out as protected farmland categories within CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. Neither the City nor the State has adopted quantified significance thresholds related to impacts to protected farmland categories or to agricultural and forestry resources. For the purpose of this study, the significance thresholds are as stated in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, as shown in a–e of the checklist above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–e) The project site is not used for agricultural purposes, does not include agricultural zoning, is not within or adjacent to one of the areas of the City designated as a protected farmland category on the Placer County Important Farmland map, is not within or adjacent to land within a Williamson Act Contract, and is not considered forest land. Given the foregoing, the proposed project will have no impact on agricultural resources.

III. Air Quality
The City of Roseville, along with the south Placer County area, is located in the Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB). The SVAB is within the Sacramento Federal Ozone Non- Attainment Area. Under the Clean Air Act, Placer County has been designated a "serious non-attainment" area for the federal 8-hour ozone standard, “non- attainment” for the state ozone standard, and a "non-attainment" area for the federal and state PM 10 standard
(particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter). Within Placer County, the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) is responsible for ensuring that emission standards are not violated. Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 10 of 42 ends

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase
of any criteria for which the
project region is non-
attainment under an
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality
standard?
X
c) Expose sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
X
d) Result in other emissions
(such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting
a substantial number of
people?
X

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

In responding to checklist items a– c, project-related air emissions would have a significant effect if they would result in concentrations that either violate an ambient air quality standard or contribute to an existing air quality violation. To assist in making this determination, t he PCAPCD adopted thresholds of significance, which were developed by considering both the health- based ambient air quality standards and the attainment strategies outlined in the State Implementation Plan. The PCAPCD -recommended significance threshold for reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NO x) is 82 pounds daily during construction and 55 pounds daily during operation, and for particulate matter (PM) is 82 pounds per day during both construction and operation.

For all other constituents, significance is determined based on the concentration-based limits in the Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards. Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC) are also of public health concern, but no thresholds or standards are provided because they are considered to have no safe level of exposure. Analysis of TAC is based on the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook – A Community Health Perspective ( April 2005, California Air Resources Board), which lists TAC sources and recommended buffer distances from sensitive uses. For checklist item c, the PCAPCD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (Handbook) recommends that the same thresholds used for the project analysis be used for the cumulative impact analysis.

With regard to checklist item d, there are no quantified significance thresholds for exposure to objectionable odors or other emissions. Significance is determined after taking into account multiple factors, including screening distances from odor sources (as found in the PCAPCD CEQA Handbook), the direction and frequency of prevailing winds, the time of day when emissions are detectable/present, and the nature and intensity of the emission source.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–c)
Analyses are not included for sulfur dioxide, lead, and other constituents because there are no mass emission thresholds; these are concentration -based limits in the Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards which require substantial, point -source emissio ns (e.g. refineries, concrete plants, etc) before exceedance will occur, and the SVAB is in attainment for these constituents. Likewise, carbon monoxide is not analyzed because the SVAB is in attainment for this constituent, and it requires high localized concentrations (called carbon monoxide “hot spots”) before the ambient air quality standard would be exceeded. “Hot spots” are typically associated with heavy traffic congestion occurring at high -volume roadway intersections. The

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 11 of 42 ends

General Plan EIR analysis of Citywide traffic indicated that more than 70% of signalized intersections would operate at level of service C or better —that is, they will not experience heavy traffic congestion. It further indicated that analyses of existing CO concentrations at the most congested intersections in Roseville show that CO levels are well below federal and state ambient air quality standards. The discussions below focus on emissions of ROG, NOx, or PM. A project-level analysis has been prepared to determine whether the project will, on a singular level, exceed the established thresholds.

The PCACPD recommends that lead agencies use the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) to quantify a project’s construction and operational emissions for criteria air pollutants (NOX, ROG, and MP). The results are the compared to the significance thresholds established by the district, as detailed above. According to PCAPCD’s published screening table, general commercial projects smaller than 249,099 square feet will not result in NOX emissions that exceed 55 lbs/day. Typically, NOX emissions are substantially higher than ROG and PM10; therefore, it can be assumed that projects that do not exceed the NOX threshold will not exceed the ROG and PM10 thresholds and will not result in a significant impact related to operational emissions. The project site is currently developed with an existing commercial building approximately 15,998 square- feet in size w ith surface parking, landscaping, and lighting improvements. The Project includes minor changes to the building façade and building entry, a new trash enclosure, and re-paving and re-striping of the existing parking stalls on the north and western sides of the building. No off-site or frontage improvements are proposed with the Project.

The Project consists of the interior remodel of the existing 15,998-square-foot commercial building, which is well below PCAPCD’s modeled example. Given the Project’s small size and no additional square-footage, the project is not expected to result in construction or operational emissions that would exceed the district’s thresholds for significance.

The proposed project would not exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for air pollutant emissions during construction or operation. As such, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (which is the SIP) or contribute substantially to the PCAPCD’s nonattainment status for ozone. In addition, because the proposed project would not produce substantial emissions of criteria air pollutants, CO, or TACs, adjacent land uses would not be exposed to significant levels of pollutant concentrations during construction or operation. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts, and consistent with the analysis methodology outlined in the Significance Thresholds and Regulatory Setting section, cumulative impacts are less than significant.

With regard to TAC, there are hundreds of constituents which are considered toxic, but they are typically generated by stationary sources like gas stations, facilities using solvents, and heavy industrial operations. The proposed project is not a TAC-generating use, nor is it within the specified buffer area of a TAC-generating use, as established in the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook – A Community Health Perspective. Impacts due to substantial pollutant concentrations are less than significant. d) Diesel fumes from c onstruction equipment and delivery trucks are often found to be objectionable; however, construction is temporary and diesel emissions are minimal and regulated. Typical urban projects such as residences and retail businesses generally do not result in substantial objectionable odors when operated in compliance with City Ordinances (e.g. proper trash disposal and storage). The Project is a typical urban development that lacks any characteristics that would cause the generation of substantial unpleasant odors.

Thus, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in the creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. A review of the project surroundings indicates that there are no substantial odor-generating uses near the project site; the project location meets the recommended screening distances from odor-generators provided by the PCAPCD. Impacts related to odors are less than significant.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 12 of 42 ends

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat
modifications, on any
species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in
local or regional plans,
policies or regulations, or
by the California
Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
b) Have a substantial
adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural
community identified in
local or regional plans,
policies or regulations or
by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
c) Have a substantial
adverse effect on state or
federally protected
wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal,
filling, hydrological
interruption, or other
means?
X
d) Interfere substantially with
the movement of any
native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established
native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery
sites?
X
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 13 of 42 ends

IV. Biological Resources
The Project is an infill development within an urban area of the City of Roseville. The site has been graded and paved, with existing landscaping, parking, and lighting improvements. Additionally, the site is developed with an existing 15,998 square-foot building.

Would the project:

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

There is no ironclad definition of significance as it relates to biological resources. Thus, the significance of impacts to biological resources is defined by the use of expert judgment supported by facts, and relies on the policies, codes, and regulations adopted by the City and by regulatory agencies which relate to biological resources (as cited and described in the Discussion of Checklist Answers section). Thresholds for assessing the significance of environmental impacts are based on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a– f, above.

Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15065, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if:

The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species ; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; [or] substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species . . .

Various agencies regulate impacts to the habitats and animals addressed by the CEQA Guidelines checklist.

These include the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration– Fisheries, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The primary regulations affecting biological resources are described in the sections below.

Checklist item a addresses impacts to special status species. A “special status” species is one which has been identified as having relative scarcity and/or declining populations. Special status species include those formally listed as threatened or endangered, those proposed for formal listing, candidates for federal listing, and those classified as species of special concern. Also included are those species considered to be “fully protected” by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (California Fish and Wildlife), those granted “special animal” status for tracking and monitoring purposes, and those plant species considered to be rare, threatened, or endangered in California by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). The primary regulatory protections for special status species are within the Federal Endangered Species Act, California Endangered Species Act, California Fish and Game Code, and the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Checklist item b addresses all “sensitive natural communities” and riparian (creekside) habitat that may be affected by local, state, or federal regulations/policies while checklist item c focuses specifically on one type of such a community: protected wetlands. Focusing first on wetlands, the 1987 Army Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual is used to determine whether an area meets the technical criteria for a wetland. A delineation verification Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
f) Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved
local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
X

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 14 of 42 ends

by the Army Corps verifies the size and condition of the wetlands and other waters in question, and determines the extent of government jurisdiction as it relates to Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act and Section 401 of the State Clean Water Act.

The Clean Water Act protects all “navigable waters”, which are defined as traditional navigable waters that are or were used for commerce, or may be used for interstate commerce; tributaries of covered waters; and wetlands adjacent to covered waters, including tributaries. Non-navigable waters are called isolated wetlands, and are not subject to either the Federal or State Clean Water Act. Thus, isolated wetlands are not subject to federal wetland protection regulations. However, in addition to the Clean Water Act, the State also has jurisdiction over impacts to surface waters through the Por ter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne), which does not require that waters be “navigable”. For this reason, isolated wetlands are regulated by the State of California pursuant to Porter-Cologne. The City of Roseville General Plan also provides protection for wetlands, including isolated wetlands, pursuant to the General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element. Federal, State and City regulations/policies all seek to achieve no net loss of wetland acreage, values, or function.

Aside from wetlands, checklist item b also addresses other “sensitive natural communities” and riparian habitat, which includes any habitats protected by local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The City of Roseville General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element includes policies for the protection of riparian areas and floodplain areas; these are Vegetation and Wildlife section Policies 2 and 3. Policy 4 also directs preservation of additional area around stream corridors and floodplain if there is sensitive woodland, grassland, or other habitat which could be made part of a contiguous open space area. Other than wetlands, which were already discussed, US Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Wildlife habitat protections generally result from species protections, and are thus addressed via checklist item a.

For checklist item d, there are no regulations specific to the protection of migratory c orridors. This item is addressed by an analysis of the habitats present in the vicinity and analyzing the probable effects on access to those habitats which will result from a project.

The City of Roseville Tree Preservation ordinance (RMC Ch.19.66) requires protection of native oak trees, and compensation for oak tree removal. The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the City of Roseville Tree Preservation ordinance (RMC Ch.19.66) will prevent significant impacts related to loss of native oak trees, referenced by item e, above.

Regarding checklist item f, there are no adopted Habitat Conservation Plans within the City of Roseville.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a-c) The Project site is within an urban area of the City and is developed with an existing commercial building.

The site has been graded, paved with a parking area, and has landscape areas and sidewalk installed. No wetland or riparian habitat exists on the project site. No special status species are known to ex ist within the project area.
d) The City includes an interconnected network of open space corridors and preserves located throughout the City, to ensure that the movement of wildlife is not substantially impeded as the City develops. The development of the project site will not negatively impact these existing and planned open space corridors, nor is the project site located in an area that has been designated by the City, United States Fish and Wildlife, or California Department of Fish and Wildlife as vital or important for the movement of wildlife or the use of native wildlife nursery sites.
e) No oak trees will be removed as a part of the proposed project, and no other conflicts with City policy adopted for the purpose of mitigating environmental effects have been identified. There is no impact.

INITIAL STUDY
July 16, 2024
INFILL PCL 198 - WellSpace Health – 100 Stonehouse Court File #PL24-0330

Page 15 of 42 ends

Roseville City CouncilOctober 2, 2024

Roseville City Council
October 2, 2024