City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.12
File #: 0900-02-01
Item ID: 2025-685
Title: Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2 Replacement Project (RFP # 08-162) – Professional Services Agreement Contact: Inderpreet Chaggar 916-774-5553 [email protected]
SUMMARY
This item requests approval of a professional services agreement for construction management services with West Yost & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $1,009,766 for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2 Replacement Project. Funding is available in the project budget in the Water Rehabilitation Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a professional services agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for construction management services for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2 Replacement Project in the amount of $1,009,766 and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND
In 2019, the City’s Environmental Utilities Department (EU) retained Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) to conduct a condition assessment of major assets at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (BRWTP). The goal of the assessment was to establish the plant’s baseline condition and acquire pertinent data for forecasting capital improvements and funding needs to support the Water Utility Division’s rehabilitation planning process. Among other items, the evaluation recommended rehabilitation of the Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2, which would include structural repair and replacement of mechanical/process components.
The rehabilitation recommendation considered the age and condition of the basins. However, based on the City’s population growth projection and anticipated additional storage capacity that would be needed, as well as the operational efficiencies that would be gained with the new facility, EU staff, upon these further considerations, made the recommendation to replace existing basins 1 and 2 with new basins.
On September 13, 2023, a Request for Proposals (RFP) #08-124 was published for professional design services for the replacement design of the two (2) basins and on March 20, 2024, the design contract was awarded to Carollo. Carollo’s scope included providing bid documents to procure design-assist proposals and construction management services proposals from qualified entities.
On May 19, 2025, an RFP (#08-162) was published for professional services for construction management services for this project. On June 23, 2025, four (4) firms submitted proposals to the City Clerk’s office for review and consideration.
Based upon review of the proposals by EU’s Proposal Evaluation Committee, West Yost was identified as
providing the best value to the City and was ranked the highest based on the evaluation criteria outlined in the RFP. Staff therefore recommends that the contract be awarded to West Yost.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2 Replacement Project is funded by the Water Rehabilitation Fund. The proposed Construction Management Professional Services Agreement for West Yost is $1,009,766, and funding is available in the project budget in the Water Rehabilitation Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Wash Water Reclamation Basin 1 and 2 Project involves the maintenance and replacement of existing structures and facilities. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guideline Section 15302). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Inderpreet Chaggar, Senior Engineer
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 25-326
2. BRWTP Reclam Basins_West Yost PSA_signed
3. Notice of Exemption
REVIEWERS:
Inderpreet Chaggar, Environmental Utilities Department - Technical Services Created/Initiated - 9/18/2025 Jason Marks, Environmental Utilities Department - Technical Services Approved - 9/24/2025 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 9/24/2025 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 9/25/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/30/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/1/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/1/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/1/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/2/2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25-326
APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND WEST YOST & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for construction management services for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2 Replacement Project, by and between the City of Roseville and West Yost & Associates, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2 Replacement Project
Project Location(s): 9595 Barton Road, Granite Bay, CA 95746.
Project Description: The project would rehabilitate the Wash Water Reclamation Basins 1 and 2 located at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (BRWTP). The rehabilitation would include the structural repair and replacement of mechanical/process components. The design would include the replacement of the existing basins with two or three new basins within the same footprint. The project would not result in an expansion of use.
Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project qualifies for a Class 2 Categorical Exemption as described in Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 2 consists of the…replacement or reconstruction of existing…facilities where the structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced, including... replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems involving negligible or no expansion of capacity.”
The project consists of replacing the existing wash water basins with two or three new basins located within the exact footprint. The project would not result in expansion of use. Consequently, the Class 2 Categorical Exemption would apply.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Inderpreet Kaur Chaggar, Roseville Department of Environmental Utilities (916-774-5553).
Signature: Date: 1/19/2024
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.13
File #: 0800-02 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2025-707
Title: Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance, Administration, and Shop Building Project – Professional Design Services Agreement Amendment and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Inderpreet Chaggar 916-774-5553 [email protected]
SUMMARY
This item requests approval of budget adjustment for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance, Administration, and Shop Building Project (Project). The budget adjustment consists of $3,000,000 to be appropriated from available funds in the Water Operations Fund and Waste Services Operations Fund to increase the Project budget. This budget amendment, added to the existing project budget of $1,100,000 previously approved by the South Placer Wastewater Agency (SPWA) will provide a total Project budget of $4,100,000. This item also requests approval to authorize Amendment 1 to the Professional Design Services Agreement with 19six Architects, Inc. to add $43,594 to complete the design services for the Project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment 1 to the Professional Design Services Agreement (PDSA) with 19six Architects, Inc. (19six) for the PGWWTP Maintenance, Administration, and Shop Building Project for the additional amount of $43,594 to complete the project design services, for a total contract amount of $929,550; and
2. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of a $1,500,000 appropriation from the Water Operations Fund and $1,500,000 from the Waste Services Fund to increase the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance, Administration, and Shop Building Project budget.
BACKGROUND
In 2021, the City’s Environmental Utilities Department (EUD) published a Request for Proposals (RFP #08- 079) seeking professional architectural consulting firms to submit proposals for professional consulting and design services for the Project and the design of Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) Operations and Laboratory Building. The City entered into a Professional Design Services Agreement (PDSA) with Williams + Paddon Architects Planners, Inc. (W+P) on October 6, 2021. The original executed agreement included the assessment task for the Project and design task for the DCWWTP Operations and Laboratory Building. On August 30, 2022, W+P merged with 19six Architects, Inc. (19six) and the assessment effort for the Project was completed by 19six.
In 2023, SPWA approved to proceed with the 100% design of the Project. On June 19, 2024, the City entered into a sole-source PDSA with 19six Architects, Inc. to complete the design of the new PGWWTP Maintenance, Administration, and Shop Building.
The PSDA Amendment 1 includes scope and budget to revise the Project from a design, bid, build project to a design assist project, addressing the need to increase the building size to accommodate a larger conference room and larger site layout to provide the space necessary for EUD staff meetings, training, and other operational activities. This amendment also eliminates the budget and the scope of work for Construction Administration Services, which will be rescoped and budgeted with the next amendment to be issued closer to the award of the design-assist and construction contract.
The budget amendment is required due to the decision to increase the meeting room capacity from 150 to 300 people, which also requires additional parking to be constructed. This larger meeting room will serve the entire EUD; therefore, the additional cost will be split evenly between Water and Waste Services. The additional cost for this expansion is estimated at $3 million. Water and Waste Services will use available resources in their operating funds to fund their portion of the Project.
FISCAL IMPACT
The current project budget is $1,100,000 and is currently funded from the capital improvement project budget approved by the South Placer Wastewater Agency. This item includes a budget adjustment that requests an increase of $1,500,000 from the Water Operations Fund and an increase of $1,500,000 from the Waste Service Operations Fund to bring the project total to $4,100,000.
The PDSA Amendment 1 budget request of $43,594 includes $49,912.50 from the Water Operations Fund, $49,912.50 from the Waste Services Operations Fund, and decreases the budget from the SPWA Fund by $56,231. With the budget amendment requested, there will be available budget for this amendment from each of these funds within the Project.
Staff will be requesting additional SPWA funding at a future SPWA board meeting to help fund the Construction Administrative Services for 19six, the construction management services, and the construction services, which will all require additional contract and amendment approvals from the City Council.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed budget adjustment and amendment to the agreement is to provide design services for the PGWWTP Maintenance, Administration, and Shop Building, and does not authorize construction.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment, which includes professional design services. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061 (b)(c)). Once the facility has been designed, additional CEQA evaluation will be prepared.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Inderpreet Chaggar, Senior Engineer
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 25-320
2. 19Six PDSA Amendment 1_Signed
3. Ordinance 6998
REVIEWERS:
Inderpreet Chaggar, Environmental Utilities Department - Technical Services Created/Initiated - 9/23/2025 Jason Marks, Environmental Utilities Department - Technical Services Approved - 9/24/2025 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 9/24/2025 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 9/25/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/26/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/26/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/6/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/6/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/7/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/7/2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25-320
APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND 19SIX
ARCHITECTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a First Amendment to Professional Design Services Agreement for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance Administration and Shop Building Design, by and between the City of Roseville and 19six Architects, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said first amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
1 [B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\196 ame.docx:09/18/2025]
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT
Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance Administration and Shop Building Design
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and 19six Architects, a California corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT previously entered into a Professional Design Services Agreement dated June 19, 2024 (“Agreement”) regarding design development and specification services for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (“Project”); WHEREAS, CITY desires to amend the Agreement to include additional services as described in CONSULTANT’s letter/proposal dated September 17, 2025, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing and able to provide such additional services; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. CONSULTANT shall provide additional services as described in Exhibit “A” of this First Amendment to Agreement.
2 [B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\196 ame.docx:09/18/2025]
2. Section 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY shall pay forty-three thousand, five hundred ninety-four dollars ($43,594), in consideration of the additional services as set forth in Exhibit “A” to the First Amendment to Agreement.”
3. The Agreement is further amended by adding an additional paragraph regarding compliance with the Levine Act:
“24. The Levine Act Disclosure. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to CITY elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the CITY decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by CONSULTANT and/or its agent(s), CONSULTANT is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.”
4. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this First Amendment to Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________, adopted by the
3 [B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\196 ame.docx:09/18/2025] Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ___________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this First Amendment to Agreement to be executed.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a 19SIX ARCHITECTS, a California
municipal corporation corporation
BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:
BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY: _______________________________
CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: _______________________________
MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:
BY: _______________________________
SEAN BIGLEY
Environmental Utilities Director
Chief Financial Officer
Secretary 9/19/25Page 488 of 1029
4 [B:\City Attorney\COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\196 ame.docx:09/18/2025] EXHIBIT “A”
Pleasant Grove WWTP
ATTACHMENT TO OWNER/ARCHITECT CONTRACT AMENDMENT 01
CONTRACT AMENDMENTS 1.1 THRU 1.5
September 17, 2025
CONTRACT AMENDMENT 01.1 – SCOPE REVISIONS BUILDING AND SITE Scope Revision:
Project Scope and Service included in Professional Design Services Agreement PDSA (City Council Resolution No. 24-209) based on Schematic Design Progress set (dated 6/27/2023). The Schematic Design Progress set provided for a site area of 2.05 +/-acres and building area of 26,900+/- sf. As the Design Development phase progressed the scope of the Project was modified at the request of the Owners’ team to include the following:
▪ Building area (sf) was increased by 5,300+/- sf.
▪ Mezzanine area (sf) was increased by 1,300+/- sf, relocated within building and added access stair.
▪ A formal Lobby and separate unisex restroom were added. ▪ The Training Room area (sf) was expanded from 40-50 occupant capacity to 150 occupant capacity, with operable partition to allow division of the Training Room into two smaller meeting spaces.
▪ Warehouse:
o A conditioned Storage Room was added.
o A Shipping and Receiving Office was added.
▪ The First Floor Plan was revised to relocate the Break Room and Technician Shop areas. ▪ The Second Floor Plan was revised to relocate Offices and Conference Room. ▪ The entire building was revised to mirror the building layout in the North-South direction and with Site Plan revised to accommodate mirroring of building and allow access to Shop space from the south.
▪ Free standing vehicle canopies for vehicle protection and possible solar/photovoltaic array PV / vehicle canopies were added. Identified as ‘future’ for solar area purposes.
This Contract Amendment provides for Architectural and Engineering Services in connection with increased labor hours in Design Development, Construction Documents/Agency Review, and Bidding.
Construction Administration tasks are excluded.
Meetings:
Design Development - 3 additional Owner meetings for scope revision discussions Deliverables:
Revised Design Development sets
CONTRACT AMENDMENT 01.2 – TRAINING ROOM EXPANSION AND RELATED SITE WORK Scope Revision:
As the Construction Document phase progressed the scope of the Project was modified at the request of the Owners’ team to include the following:
▪ The Training Room and supporting areas were further expanded from 150 occupant capacity to 300 occupant capacity by 1,800 +/- sf.
o A/V design for Training Room is included.
Audiovisual Design Scope of Work:
Services provided in this design services proposal:
• Coordination Meetings for Needs Assessment (Zoom/Teams) – Total (5) • Site Visit/Walks (pre-AV bid) – Qty (2)
• Design Sketching – Floor Plans, RCPs, Details for concept and approvals. • Coordination with City of Roseville for further defining AV tech within each space. • Develop electrical infrastructure and architectural coordination and further define product integration.
• Build Budget Estimating.
• Build AV drawing set for project team and bid spec.
• AV specifications formatted per the issued template.
• Develop formal Scope of Work and build services proposal.
Audiovisual Design Deliverables:
Included in this AV scope of work are the following deliverables:
• Design Sketches – including Floor Plans, RCPs, and elevation markup PDFs and markup exchanges either through email or Revu Blue-Beam sessions to aid in the outline of the Basis of Design.
These will establish basic electrical and mounting requirements. • Preliminary Scope of Work Narrative outlining system functionality. • Specifications package – “CSI” or other template style specification for audiovisual systems and equipment.
• A 2D AutoCAD design coordination drawing set issued for comment and review prior to submitting the final CD design and/or permit set.
• The drawings will include AVI-SPLs standard title block unless otherwise requested by the project team to be included in the architectural deliverables.
• The drawing set will include developed Floor Plans, RCPs, and Elevations, associated electrical requirements, data requirements, storage requirements, ventilation requirements, etc. • Audio Visual product cut sheets and pertinent product information for architectural coordination as requested and as required.
• A Construction drawing set issued for comment, review, and permit (during CD phase). • The drawings will include AVI-SPL’s standard title block unless otherwise requested by the project team to be included in the architectural deliverables.
• The drawing set will include finalized drawings of that outlined above in addition to audiovisual system single line drawings.
• Audio Visual product cut sheets and pertinent product information for architectural coordination as requested and as required.
• Audiovisual submittal documentation.
Other Notes:
• This design proposal will not include any Structural Engineering documents from any AVI SPL scope as required by final design criteria and construction (additional fee). • 2D AutoCAD of architectural / infrastructure drawings will be required for the AVI-SPL design process.
• Additional parking area and revisions to the accessible path of travel to the building were added to accommodate the increased Training Room occupant load capacity. • Added 16,000+/- sf parking area improvements will be limited to grading, drainage, paving, landscape, code required signage and lighting for parking lot and pathway to building. • Added 30,000+/- sf gravel laydown area improvements will be limited to grading, drainage and gravel surface.
This Contract Amendment provides for Architectural, Interior Design and Engineering Services in connection with increased labor hours in Construction Documents/Agency Review and Bidding.
Construction Administration tasks are excluded.
▪ Preparation of drawings and specifications.
▪ Additional Submittals/Shop Drawing Reviews,
▪ Construction Observation and Punchlist tasks are excluded Meetings:
Construction Documents - 3 additional Owner meetings for scope revision discussions Deliverables:
Revised Construction Documents sets
CONTRACT AMENDMENT 01.3 – REVISE PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD (CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT)
Scope Revision:
Phase 6 – Bidding, Architectural Services included in the PDSA, provides for a traditional “Design-BidBuild” project delivery method, typically initiated at the completion of Construction Documents and issuance of Building Permits. The Owner is opting to proceed with a “Design Assist” project delivery method, to be initiated at 60% completion of Construction Documents. Through the “Design Assist” process, initiated and facilitated by the Owner, a General Contractor will be selected for the Project with the expectation that:
▪ The General Contractor will provide feedback and communication to the design team on decision-making items, helping guide the completion of the design alongside the Owner. By assisting in decision-making, the General Contractor can make sure the design remains within budget.
▪ The General Contractor and their trade expertise will provide insights into constructability, alternative materials and/or methods, and assisting value engineering that can increase value and decrease delivery schedule durations.
▪ Early contractor input can smooth the construction process, reducing the need for change orders later.
This Contract Amendment provides for Architectural, Interior Design and Engineering Services in connection with increased labor hours in Design Assist Contractor selection process and Construction Documents/Agency Review tasks.
▪ Assist Owner in Design Assist Contractor selection process. o Provide input on “Design Assist” RFQ Scope of Work prepared by the Owner. o Assist with evaluation of “Design Assist” proposals and recommendations for “shortlist” for interviews.
o Participate in General Contactor Interviews and assist in selection of Design Assist Contractor. ▪ Participate in “Value Engineering” Tasks
o Discussions/meetings with General Contractor and Owner o Review and comment on General Contractor’s proposed recommendations, including impact to design schedule and PDSA scope and fees.
o Provide peer review of Contractor’s Estimate of Probable Construction Cost (Review of lineitem cost value only, quantity take-off by Contractor). ▪ Finalize Construction Drawings and Specifications
o Incorporate mutually agreed upon decisions to finalize design, drawings and specifications work.
o Make mutually agreed upon revisions to previously completed design, drawings and specifications work.
Meetings:
Contractor Interviews - up to 3
Owner/Arch/GC Value Engineering Meetings - 3 additional Owner meetings Deliverables:
Sub-contractor Bid Sets – Permitted Construction Documents (Drawings and Specifications)
CONTRACT AMENDMENT 01.4 – REVISE FEE SCHEDULE (BILLING RATES) Revise Fee Schedule in Professional Design Services Agreement PDSA (City Council Resolution No. 24-209) to Schedule of Hourly Rates schedule below:
Note:
19six Architects & Engineers reserves the right to adjust hourly rates every six months to meet economic conditions.
Fee Adjustment:
None
CONTRACT AMENDMENT 01.5 – DELETE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Delete Phase 7 Construction Administration in its entirety. It is anticipated that a separate Contract Amendment to reinstate Construction Administration services and associated fees will be negotiated when final Construction Administration scope is agreed to.
OWNER/ARCHITECT CONTRACT AMENDMENT # 1
Date: September 17, 2025
Project: City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove
Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance Administration and Shop Building PO#: 9019369
19six #: 24270.01
Description: Contract Amendment for Scope Revisions,
Contract Date: June 19, 2024
Modifications to Basic Contract / Amendments to the following services:
Refer to Attachment.
Total Amendment Fee $ 43,594
The revised payment schedule is (updated fees in bold):
Phase / Description Previous Fee Amend No: 02 Revised Fee Design Development $ 264,670 $ 45,416 $ 310,086
Construction Documents $ 397,802 $ 149,231 $ 547,033
Bidding $ 24,969 $ 7,962 $ 32,931
Construction Administration $ 159,015 $ -159,015 $ 0
Furniture Design & Specifications $ 39,500 $ 0 $ 39,500 Total $ 885,956 $ 43,594 $ 929,550
24270.01 Pleasant Grove WWTP – Amendment 01
September 17, 2025
Amendment 01 – Breakdown by Service Phase
02.1-Scope Revisions Building and Site $ 65,360
Design Development $ 42,690
Construction Documents $ 21,968
Bidding $ 702
Construction Administration $ NIC
Furniture Design & Specifications $ 0
02.2-Training Room Expansion/Relate Site $ 99,825
Design Development $ 2,726
Construction Documents $ 95,829
Bidding $ 1,270
Construction Administration $ NIC
Furniture Design & Specifications $ 0
02.3-Revise Project Delivery Method $ 37,424
Design Development $ 0
Construction Documents $ 31,434
Bidding $ 5,990
Construction Administration $ 0
Furniture Design & Specifications $ 0
02.4 Revise Fee Schedule (Billing Rates) $ 0
02.5 Delete Construction Administration
Services Phase
$ -159,015
ORDINANCE NO. 6998
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance, Administration, and Shop Building project.
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 05/29/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:
PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6101 6587 84001 500306 1,500,000 Establish capital outlay budget for project 500306 for Water Operations Fund
6301 6587 84001 500306 1,500,000 Establish capital outlay budget for project 500306 for Waste Services Operations Fund
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 3,000,000
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 3,000,000
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6101 3601 00000 000000 (1,500,000) Decrease Water Operations Fund Balance 6301 3601 00000 000000 (1,500,000) Decrease Waste Services Operations Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (3,000,000)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
The PGWWTP Maintenance Administration and Shop Building Project (500306) funds the design and construction of a new building at the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant. The current budget of $1.1 million is in the South Placer Wastewater Authority (SPWA) Fund (7811). The capacity of the building's meeting room is now being increased from 150 to 300 people to serve the entire Environmental Utilities (EU) Department. Additional parking stalls, as required, will also be added. The estimated $3 million additional cost for this expansion will be split evenly between the Water and Waste Services Operations Funds, since both utilities will benefit from the increased capacity. There are sufficient resources available in both funds. This request will bring the project budget to $4.1 million.
At the next SPWA Board meeting, staff will request an additional $33 million from the SPWA Fund for the remainder of this project, bringing the total budget to $37.1 million. A project consultant estimated that EU's non-wastewater use of this building will be approximately 9 percent. The $3 million combined contribution from the Water and Waste Services Utilities is thus in line with this estimate.
Brian Craighead / Assistant Environmental Utilities Director 2025-26 Archana Wagley / Sr. Business Analyst
Environmental Utilities / Wastewater
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.14
File #: 0900-02-02-1 &
0201-01
Item ID: 2025-718
Title: Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Vactor Washout Station Project – Budget Adjustment
Contact: Rana Moore 916-774-5581 [email protected]
SUMMARY
This item requests approval of a $555,000 budget adjustment for construction of the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Vactor Washout Station Project. The source of funding for this agreement is from available funds in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund and Water Rehabilitation Fund. The split between the two funds for this request is as follows:
1. Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund: $370,000
2. Water Rehabilitation Fund: $185,000
This budget adjustment will bring the current project budget of $365,000 to a new total project cost of $920,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of $555,000 from available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund and Water Rehabilitation Fund to fully fund the project.
BACKGROUND
The project involves designing and constructing an improved Vactor Washout station at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to be used by both the Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution teams.
This station will replace the current unpaved, poorly lit temporary area used for vactor truck washouts by providing a paved surface, improved drainage and wastewater capture systems, and enhanced lighting for safety. These upgrades will enhance operational efficiency, safety, and environmental compliance.
On July 15, 2025, staff published a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Design-Assist Construction services.
On August 19, 2025, three (3) firms proposed on the Project. The proposals were evaluated by a panel including Environmental Utilities Department engineering and operations staff, as well as a member of the City Attorney's Office. The panel decided to reject all bids and complete the work in-house to provide better value to the City.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Vactor Washout Station Project is funded by the Wastewater Rehabilitation and Water Rehabilitation Funds.
An additional $555,000 of funding is requested to fully fund the project, including $321,000 in capital
outlay, $214,000 in secondary labor, and $20,000 in professional services. The split between the two funds for this request is as follows:
1. Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund: $370,000
2. Water Rehabilitation Fund: $185,000
This budget adjustment will bring the current project budget of $365,000 to a new total project cost of $920,000 using available funds in the Wastewater Rehabilitation and Water Rehabilitation Funds.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the minor alteration of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Rana Moore, Senior Engineer
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 7000
2. 2024_DCWWTP Vactor Clean Out Area (Class 1)
REVIEWERS:
Rana Moore, Environmental Utilities Department - Technical Services Created/Initiated - 9/24/2025 Jason Marks, Environmental Utilities Department - Technical Services Approved - 9/24/2025 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 9/24/2025 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 9/25/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/30/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/1/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/2/2025 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 10/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/6/2025
ORDINANCE NO. 7000
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Vactor Washout Station project.
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 07/03/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCALYEAR:
PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6230 5080 84001 500146 142,667 Increase internal project labor budget for project #500146-Vactor Washout Station
6230 5301 84001 500146 13,333 Increase professional services budget for project #500146-Vactor Washout Station
6230 6587 84001 500146 214,000 Increase capital outlay budget for project #500146- Vactor Washout Station
6130 5080 84001 500146 71,333 Increase internal project labor budget for project #500146-Vactor Washout Station
6130 5301 84001 500146 6,667 Increase professional services budget for project #500146-Vactor Washout Station
6130 6587 84001 500146 107,000 Increase capital outlay budget for project #500146- Vactor Washout Station
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERSOUTTOTAL 555,000
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
REVENUES/TRANSFERS INTOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 555,000
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6230 3601 00000 000000 (370,000) Decrease Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6130 3601 00000 000000 (185,000) Decrease Water Rehabilitation Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (555,000)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
The Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Vactor Washout Station Project (#500146) is funded by the Wastewater Rehabilitation and Water Rehabilitation Funds. An additional $555,000 of funding is requested to fully fund the project, including $321,000 in capital outlay, $214,000 in secondary labor, and $20,000 in professional services. The split between the two funds for this request is as follows:
1.Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund: $370,000 (66.67%)
2.Water Rehabilitation Fund: $185,000 (33.33%)
This budget adjustment will bring the current project budget of $365,000 to a new total project budget of $920,000 using the available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation and Water Rehabilitation Funds.
Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Utility Manager 2025-26
Deanne Garcia, EU Business Analyst
EU/Wastewater
Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Vactor Washout Station Project
Project Location(s): 1800 Booth Road, Roseville, CA 95747. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 474- 080-009-000, 474-110-001-000, 474-110-002-000, 473-080-000-000, and 473-080-002-000.
Project Description: The Environmental Utilities Department is requesting approval to design and constructed an improved Vactor Washout station located in the northwest corner of the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) facility. This station will replace the current unpaved, poorly lit temporary area used for vactor truck washouts by providing a paved surface, improved drainage and wastewater capture systems, and enhanced lighting for safety. These upgrades will enhance operational efficiency, safety, and environmental compliance. The project would not result in an expansion of use.
Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 1 (Existing Facilities) consists of … minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use.”
The project consists of improvements to a portion of the DCWWTP property to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and environmental compliance of an existing maintenance area for vactor trucks. The project would not result in expansion of use. Consequently, the Class 1 and Categorical Exemption applies.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Arashdeep Singh, Roseville Department of Environmental Utilities (916) 746-1854.
Signature: Date: 8/22/2024
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.15
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2025-696
Title: 2024 Power Source Disclosure and Power Content Label Contact: Melissa Seghezzi 916-774-5652 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the 2024 Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2024 Power Content Labels. Senate Bill 1305 requires California electricity suppliers to disclose the sources of their power through Power Source Disclosure Reports. These reports are used to create annual Power Content Labels, which must be posted on suppliers’ websites and shared with customers. There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of the 2024 Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2024 Power Content Labels.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the 2024 Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2024 Power Content Labels.
BACKGROUND
Senate Bill (SB) 1305, approved in 1997, directs all California retail suppliers of electricity to disclose to consumers the sources of energy used to provide the electric service in an accurate, reliable, and simple to understand manner. The SB 1305 report is referred to as the Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Report.
The data contained in the PSD Reports are subsequently used to prepare the annual Power Content Labels (PCLs), which are mailed to the electric utility's customers and posted on Roseville Electric’s website. Under current regulations, retail suppliers such as the City must post their PCLs online by October 1, 2025. In addition, PCLs must be included in written promotional materials provided to customers by the end of the first complete billing cycle in the fourth quarter, or no later than December 31, 2025.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of the 2024 Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2024 Power Content Labels.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The 2024 PSD Reports and PCLs meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Seghezzi, Electric Business Analyst
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 25-324
2. 2024 PSD Annual Report - Roseville Submittal
3. 2024 PCL City of Roseville
REVIEWERS:
Melissa Seghezzi, Electric Department - Resource Planning & Generation Created/Initiated - 9/17/2025 William Forsythe, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/23/2025 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/26/2025 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/26/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/30/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/30/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/1/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/2/2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25-324
APPROVING THE 2024 ANNUAL POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE REPORTS AND THE 2024 POWER CONTENT LABELS, AND ATTESTING TO THE VERACITY
OF THE ANNUAL REPORTS
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1305 (SB 1305), adopted in 1997, directs all California retail suppliers of electricity to disclose to consumers the sources of energy used to provide the electric service in an accurate, reliable and simple to understand manner; and WHEREAS, the SB 1305 report is referred to as the Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Report and the data contained in the PSD reports are used to prepare the annual Power Content Labels (PCLs); and
WHEREAS, the regulation requires publicly owned electric utilities, like Roseville, to have City Council attest to the veracity of the PSD Report and PCLs; and
WHEREAS, Roseville Electric Utility staff has prepared the 2024 Annual Power Source Disclosure Reports in accordance with the Power Content Label Program requirements and deadlines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the 2024 Annual Power Source Disclosure Reports and 2024 Power Content Labels are hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution hereby provides attestation of the veracity of the annual reports submitted by staff.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of ____________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call.
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
City Clerk
Version: April 2025
Submit the Annual Report and signed Attestation in PDF format with the Excel version of the Annual Report to [email protected]. Remember to complete the Retail Supplier Name and contact information above.
NOTE: Information submitted in this report is not automatically held confidential. If your company wishes the information submitted to be considered confidential an authorized representative must submit an application for confidential designation California Energy Commission's website.
If you have questions, contact Power Source Disclosure (PSD) staff at [email protected] or (916) 639-0573.
EMAIL [email protected]
WEBSITE URL
FOR PCL
POSTING
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/electric_utili ty/about_us/reports___publications/power_content_label
MAILING 116 S Grant St
CITY, STATE, ZIP Roseville, CA 95678
PHONE 916-746-1671
TITLE Associate Electric Analyst
2024 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
For the Year Ending December 31, 2024
Retail suppliers are required to use the posted template and are not allowed to make edits to this format. Please complete all requested information.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
RETAIL SUPPLIER NAME
City of Roseville
CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME Melissa Seghezzi
Version: April 2025
Annual Data Roseville Portfolio Totals PCL Data Roseville Community Solar Portfolio Totals PCL Data Instructions: Retail Sales 1143769 Retail Sales 1677
1. Enter the electricity portfolio name in cell O25 and additional electricity portfolio names as needed in cells P25-V25. Total Specified 1143769 Total Specified 1677
2. Enter information about all power procurements and retail sales. Insert additional rows as needed. All fields in white should be filled out. Fields in grey auto-populate as needed and should not be filled out. Biomass & Biogas 0 0% Biomass & Biogas 0 0%
3. For all specified purchases, enter the facility name, fuel type, state or province, WREGIS ID of REC source, RPS ID of REC source, EIA ID of delivered energy, gross MWhs procured, and specified resales MWhs. Geothermal 51193 4% Geothermal 0 0%
4. For firmed-&-shaped procurements specifically, enter all fields from step 3. Additionally, enter the EIA ID of the substitute power in the "EIA ID of delivered energy" field and select "Yes" in the "Firmed-&-Shaped Resource?" field. If the associated GHG emissions are eligible for firmed-&-shaped grandfathering, select "Yes" in the relevant field. Eligible Hydroelectric 21286 2% Eligible Hydroelectric 0 0%
5. Proxy EIA IDs for unspecified power and specified system mixes from asset-controlling suppliers have been provided. Enter "Unspecified Power", "BPA", or "Tacoma Power" as applicable. Solar 25428 2% Solar 1677 100%
6. Proxy EIA IDs for aggregated reporting of WAPA CVP or PCIA resoures; Enter "CVP", "PCIA Solar", "PCIA Wind", "PCIA Eligible Hydro", or "PCIA Large Hydro" as applicable. Wind 260076 23% Wind 0 0%
7. Procurements of unspecified power must not be entered as line items below; unspecified power will be calculated automatically in the individual electricity portfolio tables to the right after all specified resources have been allocated. Large Hydroelectric 377633 33% Large Hydroelectric 0 0%
8. Allocate net MWhs procured to each electricity portfolio until the loads are balanced across each portfolio. If the total Net MWhs Procured exceeds the total retail sales of all portfolios, allocate only enough MWh to meet the retail sales of each portfolio. Nuclear 9954 1% Nuclear 0 0% Emerging Technologies 0 0% Emerging Technologies 0 0%
Other 653 0% Other 0 0%
Natural Gas 393868 34% Natural Gas 0 0%
Coal & Petroleum 0 0% Coal & Petroleum 0 0%
Unspecified Power - ACS 3677 Unspecified Power - ACS 0
Unspecified Power - Spot Market 0 Unspecified Power - Spot Market 0 Unspecified Power - Total 3677 0% Unspecified Power - Total 0 0% Over allocation
check ✓ Total PCL GHGs (MT CO2e) 185308.0 Total PCL GHGs (MT CO2e) 0.0 Under allocation
check ✓ Emissions intensity (MT CO2e/MWh) 0.162 Emissions intensity (MT CO2e/MWh) 0.000 Coal check ✓ PCL GHG Intensity (lbs CO2e/MWh) 357 PCL GHG Intensity (lbs CO2e/MWh) 0 Negative
oversupply check ✓ Unbundled REC % 4% Unbundled REC % 0% Retail Sales 1143768.59 1677
Unmet Load
00000000
Roseville Roseville Community Solar
Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province
WREGIS ID
of REC
source
RPS ID of
REC
source
EIA ID of
delivered
energy
Gross
MWhs
Procured
Specified
Resales
MWhs
Net MWhs
Procured
Firmed &
Shaped
Resource?
Eligible for Firmed &
Shaped
Grandfathering?
Total EF
(MT
CO2e/MWh)
Total
GHGs
PCL EF
(MT
CO2e/MWh)
Roseville Roseville
Community Solar
Electricity Portfolio
#3 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#4 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#5 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#6 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#7 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#8 Name Remainder/Oversupply Facility Name Fuel Type Net Procurement Annual
PCL
GHGs (MT
CO2e)
Facility Name Fuel Type Net Procurement
Annual
PCL
GHGs (MT
CO2e)
Blackwell Solar Solar CA W4587 61892 59524 290 290 0.0000 0.0000 290 Blackwell Solar Solar 290 0 - - - 0 Camelot Solar CA W4190 60824 58983 7190 7190 0.0000 0.0000 7190 Camelot Solar 7190 0 - - - 0 Cape Scott Wind Farm Wind BC W3959 60600 P149 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 Cape Scott Wind Farm Wind 1 0 - - - 0 Geothermal 1; Units 1-2 & Onsite Load Geothermal CA W1254 60908 7368 18348 18348 0.0548 1005 0.0000 18348 Geothermal 1; Units 1-2 & Onsite Load Geothermal 18348 0 - - - 0 Geothermal 1; Units 1-2 & Onsite Load Geothermal CA W4883 60908 7368 675 675 0.0548 37 0.0000 675 Geothermal 1; Units 1-2 & Onsite Load Geothermal 675 0 - - - 0 Geothermal 1; Units 1-2 & Onsite Load Geothermal CA W1255 60908 7368 3644 3644 0.0548 200 0.0000 3644 Geothermal 1; Units 1-2 & Onsite Load Geothermal 3644 0 - - - 0 Geothermal 2, Unit 4 Geothermal CA W1257 60911 7369 28526 28526 0.0829 2365 0.0000 28526 Geothermal 2, Unit 4 Geothermal 28526 0 - - - 0 Geothermal Solar Unit 1 Solar CA W1509 62040 P217 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Geothermal Solar Unit 1 Solar 4 0 - - - 0 Geothermal Solar Unit 2 Solar CA W2792 62041 P218 5 5 0.0000 0.0000 5 Geothermal Solar Unit 2 Solar 5 0 - - - 0 Juniper Canyon Wind Power Wind WA W1690 61202 56360 61994 61994 0.0000 0.0000 61994 Juniper Canyon Wind Power Wind 61994 0 - - - 0 KELLY RIDGE POWERHOUSE Eligible Hydroelectric CA W761 60266 418 10952 10952 0.0000 0.0000 10952 KELLY RIDGE POWERHOUSE Eligible Hydroelectric 10952 0 - - - 0 Klondike Wind Power IIIA Wind OR W817 60694 56468 42389 42389 0.0000 0.0000 42389 Klondike Wind Power IIIA Wind 42389 0 - - - 0 Leaning Juniper Wind Power II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 100617 100617 0.0000 0.0000 100617 Leaning Juniper Wind Power II Wind 100617 0 - - - 0 Lost Hills Solar Solar CA W4586 61893 58712 515 515 0.0000 0.0000 515 Lost Hills Solar Solar 515 0 - - - 0 Nimbus Powerplant Eligible Hydroelectric CA W1161 61045 444 3357 3357 0.0000 0.0000 3357 Nimbus Powerplant Eligible Hydroelectric 3357 0 - - - 0 Solar Star California XLIV, LLC Solar CA W5312 63128 60869 1169 1169 0.0000 0.0000 1169 Solar Star California XLIV, LLC Solar 1169 0 - - - 0 Quality Wind Project Wind BA W3160 62247 P154 75 75 0.0000 0.0000 75 Quality Wind Project Wind 75 0 - - - 0 Roseville Community Solar - CF Rosev Solar CA W7161 64204 62114 1677 1677 0.0000 0.0000 1677 - - - 0 Roseville Community Solar - CF RosevilleSolar 1677 0 Sanborn Solar 1B - Sub Project S4 Solar CA W13639 64912 65674 4044 4044 0.0000 0.0000 4044 Sanborn Solar 1B - Sub Project S4 Solar 4044 0 - - - 0 Sly Creek Powerhouse Eligible Hydroelectric CA W701 60267 776 4214 4214 0.0000 0.0000 4214 Sly Creek Powerhouse Eligible Hydroelectric 4214 0 - - - 0 Solverde 1 Solar CA W5085 63144 60185 12211 12211 0.0000 0.0000 12211 Solverde 1 Solar 12211 0 - - - 0 Spicer Meadow Project Eligible Hydroelectric CA W1260 61580 54554 2577 2577 0.0000 0.0000 2577 Spicer Meadow Project Eligible Hydroelectric 2577 0 - - - 0 Stampede Powerplant Eligible Hydroelectric CA W1177 61046 7066 186 186 0.0000 0.0000 186 Stampede Powerplant Eligible Hydroelectric 186 0 - - - 0 Juniper Canyon Wind Power Wind WA W1690 61202 56360 16053 16053 Y 0.0000 0.0000 16053 Juniper Canyon Wind Power Wind 16053 0 - - - 0 Klondike Wind Power IIIA Wind OR W817 60694 56468 12920 12920 Y 0.0000 0.0000 12920 Klondike Wind Power IIIA Wind 12920 0 - - - 0 Leaning Juniper Wind Power II Wind OR W1689 61200 57333 26027 26027 Y 0.0000 0.0000 26027 Leaning Juniper Wind Power II Wind 26027 0 - - - 0 Bonneville Power Administration (AssetLarge hydroelectric BPA 76361 76361 0.0160 1222 0.0160 76361.39937 Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-CLarge hydroelectric 76361.39937 1221.782 - - - 0 Bonneville Power Administration (AssetNuclear BPA 9954 9954 0.0160 159 0.0160 9954.45854 Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-CNuclear 9954.45854 159.2713 - - - 0 Bonneville Power Administration (AssetOther BPA 653 653 0.0160 10 0.0160 653.1555361 Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-COther 653.1555361 10.45049 - - - 0 Bonneville Power Administration (AssetUnspecified Power - ACS BPA 3677 3677 0.0160 59 0.0160 3676.986552 Bonneville Power Administration (Asset-CUnspecified Power - 3676.986552 58.83178 - - - 0 Boundary Hydroelectric Units Large Hydroelectric WA 6433 75546 75546 0.0000 0.0000 75546 Boundary Hydroelectric Units Large Hydroelectric 75546 0 - - - 0 COLVIL_7_PL1X1 - Collierville Powerh Large Hydroelectric CA W1258 54555 45749 16459 29290 0.0000 0.0000 29290 COLVIL_7_PL1X1 - Collierville PowerhouLarge Hydroelectric 29290 0 - - - 0 COLVIL_7_PL1X2 - Collierville Powerh Large Hydroelectric CA W1259 54555 17936 10867 7069 0.0000 0.0000 7069 COLVIL_7_PL1X2 - Collierville PowerhouLarge Hydroelectric 7069 0 - - - 0 Folsom Powerplant - Folsom Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric CA 441 8209 8209 0.0000 0.0000 8209 Folsom Powerplant - Folsom Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric 8209 0 - - - 0 Folsom Powerplant - Folsom Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric CA 441 7159 7159 0.0000 0.0000 7159 Folsom Powerplant - Folsom Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric 7159 0 - - - 0 Folsom Powerplant - Folsom Unit 3 Large Hydroelectric CA 441 4892 4892 0.0000 0.0000 4892 Folsom Powerplant - Folsom Unit 3 Large Hydroelectric 4892 0 - - - 0 Forbestown Large Hydroelectric CA 417 21159 11052 10107 0.0000 0.0000 10106.8821 Forbestown Large Hydroelectric 10106.8821 0 - - - 0 Gianelli Powerplant - Gianelli (2) Large Hydroelectric CA 448 2255 2255 0.0000 0.0000 2255 Gianelli Powerplant - Gianelli (2) Large Hydroelectric 2255 0 - - - 0 Gianelli Powerplant - Gianelli (6) Large Hydroelectric CA 448 1745 1745 0.0000 0.0000 1745 Gianelli Powerplant - Gianelli (6) Large Hydroelectric 1745 0 - - - 0 J.F. Carr Powerplant - J.F. Carr Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric CA 442 3615 3615 0.0000 0.0000 3615 J.F. Carr Powerplant - J.F. Carr Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric 3615 0 - - - 0 J.F. Carr Powerplant - J.F. Carr Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric CA 442 4678 4678 0.0000 0.0000 4678 J.F. Carr Powerplant - J.F. Carr Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric 4678 0 - - - 0 Keswick Powerplant - Keswick Powerpl Large Hydroelectric CA 443 11891 11891 0.0000 0.0000 11891 Keswick Powerplant - Keswick PowerplanLarge Hydroelectric 11891 0 - - - 0 Mid-C Hydro - Priest Rapids and Wana Large Hydroelectric WA 3887 93 93 0.0000 0.0000 93 Mid-C Hydro - Priest Rapids and WanapuLarge Hydroelectric 93 0 - - - 0 NCPA STIG Natural gas CA 7449 3405 3405 0.3852 1311 0.3852 3404.6545 NCPA STIG Natural gas 3404.6545 1311.473 - - - 0 New Melones Powerplant - New MeloneLarge Hydroelectric CA 6158 30 30 0.0000 0.0000 30 New Melones Powerplant - New MelonesLarge Hydroelectric 30 0 - - - 0 New Melones Powerplant - New MeloneLarge Hydroelectric CA 6158 18098 18098 0.0000 0.0000 18098 New Melones Powerplant - New MelonesLarge Hydroelectric 18098 0 - - - 0 O'Neill Powerplant - O'Neil (alt 3) Large Hydroelectric CA 446 51 51 0.0000 0.0000 51 O'Neill Powerplant - O'Neil (alt 3) Large Hydroelectric 51 0 - - - 0 REP Natural gas CA 56298 529732 529732 0.4573 242247 0.4573 383137 146595 REP Natural gas 383137.2343 175208.7 - - - 0 RPP2 Natural gas CA 7452 7327 7327 1.0015 7338 1.0015 7326.5835 RPP2 Natural gas 7326.5835 7337.573 - - - 0 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric CA 445 18229 18229 0.0000 0.0000 18229 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric 18229 0 - - - 0 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric CA 445 12616 12616 0.0000 0.0000 12616 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric 12616 0 - - - 0 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 3 Large Hydroelectric CA 445 21253 21253 0.0000 0.0000 21253 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 3 Large Hydroelectric 21253 0 - - - 0 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 4 Large Hydroelectric CA 445 15906 15906 0.0000 0.0000 15906 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 4 Large Hydroelectric 15906 0 - - - 0 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 5 Large Hydroelectric CA 445 9831 9831 0.0000 0.0000 9831 Shasta Powerplant - Shasta Unit 5 Large Hydroelectric 9831 0 - - - 0 Spring Creek Powerplant - Spring Cree Large Hydroelectric CA 450 10724 10724 0.0000 0.0000 10724 Spring Creek Powerplant - Spring Creek Large Hydroelectric 10724 0 - - - 0 Spring Creek Powerplant - Spring Cree Large Hydroelectric CA 450 274 274 0.0000 0.0000 274 Spring Creek Powerplant - Spring Creek Large Hydroelectric 274 0 - - - 0 Trinity Powerplant - Trinity Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric CA 451 6173 6173 0.0000 0.0000 6173 Trinity Powerplant - Trinity Unit 1 Large Hydroelectric 6173 0 - - - 0 Trinity Powerplant - Trinity Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric CA 451 7068 7068 0.0000 0.0000 7068 Trinity Powerplant - Trinity Unit 2 Large Hydroelectric 7068 0 - - - 0 Woodleaf Large Hydroelectric CA 419 31902 17433 14469 0.0000 0.0000 14469.2356 Woodleaf Large Hydroelectric 14469.2356 0 - - - 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A - - -0- - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - -0- - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - -0- - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - -0- - - 0
Version: April 2025
44,082 ‐
RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS
Facility Name Fuel Type
State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh) Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)
Spanish Fork Wind Park 2 LLC Wind UT 63434 214
Rim Rock Wind Energy Facility Wind MT 60874 2000
Glacier Wind Energy 1 Facility Wind MT 60708 10000
Glacier Wind Energy 2 Facility Wind MT 60709 15000
Glacier Wind Energy 2 Facility Wind MT 60709 16868
Roseville Community Solar
Total Retired Unbundled RECs Total Retired Unbundled RECs Roseville
Version: April 2025
Net MWh Procured N/A Resource Type Resource Mix Factors Resource-Specific Procurements
from ACS
90,646 Biomass & biogas ‐ Geothermal ‐
Eligible hydroelectric ‐
Solar ‐
Wind ‐
Coal ‐
Large hydroelectric 0.84 76,361
Natural gas ‐ Nuclear 0.11 9,954
Other 0.01 653
Unspecified Power 0.04 3,677
Net MWh Procured N/A Resource Type Resource Mix Factors Resource-Specific Procurements
from ACS
Biomass & biogas ‐ Geothermal ‐
Eligible hydroelectric ‐
Solar ‐
Wind ‐
Coal ‐
Large hydroelectric 0.89 ‐ Natural gas ‐ Nuclear 0.06 ‐ Other ‐ Unspecified Power 0.06 ‐
ASSET CONTROLLING SUPPLIER RESOURCE MIX CALCULATOR
Bonneville Power Administration
Tacoma Power
Instructions: Enter total net specified procurement of ACS system resources into cell A8 or A23.
In Column E, the calculator will determine quantities of resource‐specific net procurement for entry on Schedule 1.
Version: April 2025
2024 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
ATTESTATION FORM
For the Year Ending December 31, 2024
(RETAIL SUPPLIER NAME)
I, [print name] _______Melissa Seghezzi____________________, [title] __Associate Electric Analyst____, declare under penalty of perjury, that the information provided in this report is true and correct and that I, as an authorized agent of [retail supplier], _______City of Roseville___________, have authority to submit this report on the retail supplier's behalf. I further declare that all of the electricity claimed as specified purchases as shown in this report was sold once and only once to retail customers.
Name: __Melissa Seghezzi________________________
Representing (Retail Supplier):_________City of Roseville_________________ Signature: __________________________________________________________ Dated: _____________________________________________________________ Executed at: ___116 S Grant St, Roseville CA 95678_______________________ 5/29/2025
2024 POWER CONTENT LABEL
City of Roseville
Roseville Roseville CA Utility Average Community Solar
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity
(lbs of CO2e emitted per megawatt hour) 357 0 359
Electricity Sources
■ Renewables and Zero-Carbon Resources
■ Fossil Fuels and Unspecified Power
RPS Eligible Renewables 31% 100% 45%
Biomass & Biogas 0% 0% 2%
Geothermal 4% 0% 5%
Eligible Hydroelectric 2% 0% 2%
Solar 2% 100% 23%
Wind 23% 0% 14%
Large Hydroelectric 33% 0% 10%
Nuclear 1% 0% 11%
Emerging Technologies 0% 0% 0%
Other 0% 0% 0%
Natural Gas 34% 0% 10%
Coal & Petroleum 0% 0% 2%
Unspecified Power (primarily fossil fuels) 0% 0% 22%
Total 100% 100% 100%
Retail sales covered by retired unbundled RECs 4% 0%
■ This label does not reflect compliance with the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS), which measures the use of tracking instruments called Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) over the course of multi-year compliance periods. RECs that are purchased separately from the renewable energy ("Unbundled RECs") can be used for RPS compliance, but they do not factor into the power mixes or GHG emissions intensities above. ■ GHG intensity figures exclude biogenic CO2 and emissions from geothermal sources and grandfathered imports of firmed-and-shaped energy. For detailed information about all GHG emissions from California's retail electricity suppliers, visit the CEC webpage at the link below.
■ Unspecified power is electricity purchased from a genericized pool on the open market. https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments
/electric_utility/about_us/reports___publications/pow
er_content_label
Want to learn more?
Visit https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-andtopics/programs/power-source-disclosureprogram
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.16
File #: 0203-07 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2025-717
Title: RPEAK Evaporative Cooling Construction and Installation Services - Contract Purchase Agreement and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Michael Zasso 916-746-1665 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract Purchase Agreement (CPA) with Performance Mechanical Incorporated (PMI) for Evaporative Cooling Systems Construction and Installation services at the Roseville Peaking Plant (RPEAK) in the amount of $716,114, grant the City Manager, or a designee, the authority to authorize change orders up to 10% of the overall contract cost with a total cost not to exceed $787,725 for unforeseen change orders, and approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $2,750,000 for the project from available resources in the Electric Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract Purchase Agreement (CPA) with Performance Mechanical Incorporated (PMI) for Evaporative Cooling Systems Construction and Installation services at the Roseville Peaking Plant (RPEAK) in the amount of $716,114, and give the City Manager, or a designee, the authority to authorize change orders up to 10% of the overall contract cost with a total cost not to exceed $787,725 for unforeseen change orders.
Staff additionally recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $2,750,000 from the Electric Fund for the project.
BACKGROUND
In 2021, Roseville executed agreements with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to site two generating units adjacent to the Roseville Energy Park (REP) as part of the State of California’s overall efforts to improve electric system reliability. The site was named the Roseville Peaking Plant (RPEAK). In 2023, Roseville and CDWR reached agreement to place Roseville on a path to take ownership of these generating units. As part of taking ownership of the units in November 2024, Roseville agreed to install an evaporative cooling system on each unit.
The units at the RPEAK site currently utilize air at ambient temperature for their combustion process. While this may be adequate during cold winter days, during the summer when the air is hot and dry, these turbines are not able to reach maximum designed output. By installing evaporative cooling systems, the units will be able to generate near designed power output year-round.
Staff received City Council approval on June 19, 2024 for a purchase order with GE Vernova Operations, LLC (GE) for the major hardware for this project, as they are the original equipment manufacturer of the units. GE’s proposal did not include installation services of the modules onto the turbines. Through a
competitive bid RFP process, PMI was selected to perform the construction of foundations for the modules, piping re-routing and connections, and the installation services of the modules on the RPEAK units. Additionally, as competitive bids have been received for various components of the project, construction and major material costs have come in higher than anticipated and a budget adjustment is required to complete this project.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Contract Purchase Agreement amount is $716,114, with a total not-to-exceed amount, including ten percent (10%) change order authority, of $787,725 for the work. City Council approval of the ordinance will result in a budget adjustment in the amount of $2,750,000 to add funds to the project from available resources in the Electric Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the minor alteration of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Michael Zasso, Power Plant Engineer
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 25-331
2. Contract Purchase Agreement PMI Signed Copy
3. Ordinance 7003
4. CEQA Notice of Exemption
REVIEWERS:
Michael Zasso, Electric Department - Engineering Created/Initiated - 9/23/2025 Chris Porter, Electric Department - Engineering Approved - 9/26/2025 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/26/2025 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/26/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/2/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/3/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/3/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/7/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/7/2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25-331
APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PERFORMANCE MECHANICAL, INC. AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3005045) for construction services for Roseville Peaking Plant Evaporative Coolers, by and between the City of Roseville and Performance Mechanical, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 7003
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for evaporative cooling systems construction and installation services at the Roseville Peaking Plant (RPEAK).
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 07/03/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:
PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6001 6587 84701 700061 2,750,000 Increase Electric - RPEAK CTs Upgrade CIP EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 2,750,000
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 2,750,000
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6001 3601 00000 000000 (2,750,000) Decrease Electric Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (2,750,000)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
The Electric Department is requesting a budget adjustment of $2,750,000 to increase the Electric - RPEAK CTs Upgrade project (700061) budget from available resources in the Electric fund.
As part of taking ownership of combustion turbine generators (RPEAK) sited at the Roseville Energy Park by the State of California in 2021, Roseville was required to participate in the California Energy Commission's Distributed Electricity Backup Assets Program (DEBA). The DEBA program requires the installation of evaporative cooling and gas compression on the combustion turbine generators in order increase their output capability during extreme events by increasing their efficiency. When the project was created, only very preliminary budget estimates were available. As key components and services have been bid, the cost of materials and labor have come in significantly higher than expected. As such, additional funds are required to complete the project.
The current project budget is $9,280,000. With this adjustment, the revised project budget will total $12,030,000.
Chris Porter, Assistant Electric Utility Director 2025-26 Matt Nelson, Interim Electric Utility Financial Admin
Electric/Engineering
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.17
File #: 0800-02
Item ID: 2025-682
Title: Second Reading - Water Rate Assistance Program - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment
Contact: Noelle Mattock 916-774-5504 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends the City Council approve an ordinance for second reading adding Section 14.08.215 to Chapter 14.08 of the Roseville Municipal Code.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce an ordinance for the first reading to approve adding Section 14.08.215 to Chapter 14.08 of the Roseville Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND
Since the passage of the California Human Right to Water (AB 685) in 2012, water affordability has emerged as a focal point for the Legislature and the State Water Resources Control Board. AB 685 added Section 106.3 to the California Water Code, stating:
"It is the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes."
There are many factors involved in setting water rates (aging infrastructure, regulatory compliance, inflation and operational costs, adaptation to changing weather patterns and conservation efforts, to name a few), all of which play a role in affordability. Despite having some of the region’s most competitive rates, residents have repeatedly called for a local rate assistance program during rate case discussions over the last decade.
While EU staff engages in policy discussions at the State and Federal levels on developing statewide policy solutions, EU wanted to be responsive to the feedback we have received. As a result, EU has developed a water rate assistance program (WRAP) to meet the needs of our local community.
Key elements of WRAP:
• Would grant up to a 20% discount on the monthly fixed base water service charge to income-eligible customers.
• Income-eligible customers are defined as households at or below 200% of the Federal Poverty Level.
• This program would be funded using non-rate revenue (late fees), in accordance with Proposition 218. The approved fiscal year 2026 budget includes $123,750 in forecasted late fee revenue.
• For Prop. 218 compliance and determining the discount percentage each year, EU will track available late fees and discounts provided.
• To facilitate enrollment in WRAP, customers currently enrolled in the Electric Rate
Assistance Program (ERAP) will automatically be enrolled into WRAP. 994 customers will be auto-enrolled.
• There are approximately 90 customers who receive water service but do not receive electric service that may be eligible for the program.
• Participants must re-certify eligibility every three years.
Anticipated program allocations through fiscal year 2030 are:
Fiscal
Year
Monthly
Fixed
Charge
20%
Discount/Customer
Annual
Discount/Customer
Total
Anticipated
Customers
Annual
Program
Cost
2026 $31.63 $6.33 $75.91 1084 $82,288.61
2027 $32.90 $6.58 $78.96 1084 $85,592.64
2028 $35.36 $7.07 $84.86 1084 $91,992.58
2029 $38.01 $7.60 $91.22 1084 $98,886.82
2030 $40.87 $8.17 $98.09 1084
$106,327.39
Projected costs reflect estimated customer participation and anticipated rate increases through FY30.
Participation in this program is expected to have a positive effect on the Water Utility budget within the Environmental Utilities Department by reducing the number of customer accounts with past due balances that could lead to a re-payment plan, a disconnection of service or utility accounts turned over for collections.
FISCAL IMPACT
The funding for WRAP comes from non-rate revenue (late fees). By enabling customers to pay their utility bills on time, the water utility may experience a reduction in late fee revenues. Furthermore, with fewer late fees, overdue balances, and water shutoffs, Roseville could see a positive impact by avoiding the need to pursue or write off bad debts.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The action of reviewing legislation and fiscal activities meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Noelle Mattock, Utility Government Relations Administrator Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 7004
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created -
George Hanson, City Clerk Department
Brian Craighead, Environmental Utilities Department
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All
Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department
Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department
ORDINANCE NO. 7004
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ADDING SECTION
14.08.215 TO CHAPTER 14.08 OF TITLE 14 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING WATER RATE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The section of the Roseville Municipal Code listed above is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “A”.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT "A"
§ 14.08.215. Low-income service charge reduction.
A. Effective December 1, 2025, any qualifying household with a total income no greater than 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) may apply for an up to 20 percent reduction on their monthly water base service charge. Applications for this reduced service charge shall be on forms supplied by the city. All information required to be given on such forms shall be supplied by the applicant on behalf of the household under penalty of perjury. This shall be known as the “Water Rate Assistance Program”, as may be amended from time to time. Effective December 1, 2025, all qualifying persons who have been approved to receive the lowincome service charge reduction under the Water Rate Assistance Program shall receive up to a 20 percent reduction on their monthly water base service charge, subject to fund availability.
B. Effective December 1, 2025, any qualifying household currently enrolled in the “Electric Rate Assistance Program”, as authorized by Section 14.24.079 of this Code, will be automatically enrolled in the “Water Rate Assistance Program”.
C. The Water Rate Assistance Program shall be available to qualifying household which file complete and accepted applications with the environmental utilities director. A change of address terminates eligibility for the Water Rate Assistance Program provided in this section, but a new application at a new address may be made and may be allowed, if the requirements set out in this section are satisfied.
D. For the purposes of this section, a "qualifying household" is defined as any household with a verifiable gross household income no greater than 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and that is otherwise in compliance with all applicable requirements of this Chapter 14.08 and Chapter 14.04.
E. Persons will be required to periodically re-apply and certify eligibility to continue to participate in the Water Rate Assistance Program. Recertification will occur no more frequent than on an annual basis.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.18
File #: 0502
Item ID: 2025-740
Title: Second Reading - Campaign Finance Disclosure - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment Contact: Carmen Avalos 916-774-5269 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends the City Council approve an ordinance for second reading amending Section 2.60.040 of Chapter 2.60 of Title 2 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Campaign Finance Disclosure to align with the Fair Political Practices Commission's semi-annual filing dates and to establish clear election cycle dates for all future Roseville General Municipal Elections.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Section 2.60.040 of Chapter 2.60 of Title 2 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Campaign Finance Disclosure to align with the Fair Political Practices Commission's semi-annual filing dates and to establish clear election cycle dates for all future Roseville General Municipal Elections.
BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville transitioned to district-based elections in 2019, and during that process staff revised several sections of Chapter 2.60 of the Roseville Municipal Code (RMC). Currently, the RMC sets the campaign period to begin nine (9) months prior to the general municipal election and concludes on December 31st of the same year the election is held. The proposed amendment sets January 1st of the election year as the first day of the campaign cycle and will establish a clear campaign period for future Roseville general municipal elections. The amendment aligns with the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) semi-annual filing period and establishes a defined campaign cycle for all future Roseville general elections.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed ordinance amendment.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed Ordinance meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 7005
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created -
Helen Dreyer, City Clerk Department
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk Department
Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department
Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department
ORDINANCE NO. 7005
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION
2.60.040 OF CHAPTER 2.60 OF TITLE 2 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The section of the Roseville Municipal Code listed above is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “A”.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT "A"
2.60.040. Definitions.
Whenever in this chapter the following words or phrases are used, they shall mean as follows:
“Candidate” means any individual who is listed on the ballot or who has begun to circulate nominating petitions or authorized others to circulate petitions in his or her behalf, for nomination for or election to any elective city office, or who receives a contribution or makes an expenditure or gives his or her consent for any other person to receive a contribution with a view to bringing about his or her nomination or election to any city office, whether or not the specific elective office for which he or she will seek nomination or election is known at the time the contribution is received or the expenditure is made and whether or not he or she has announced his or her candidacy or filed a declaration of candidacy at such time. Candidate also includes any holder of any elective city office who is the subject of a recall election. “Campaign” means the effort associated with seeking election to any elective city office. “Campaign period,” for general election, means the period from January 1 of the year of the general election for any elective city office, until the December 31st immediately following such general election. “Campaign period” for a special election means the period from the date the city council calls for special election until two months after the special election. In the case of a recall election, the “campaign period” shall commence on the date a notice of intent to circulate a recall petition is served on the city clerk until two months after the recall election. Except as provided in Section 2.60.065(E) below, no candidate shall retain or expend any contribution received outside of the campaign period for any election in which he or she is a candidate. “Contribution” means a payment, a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a third party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment except to the extent that full and adequate consideration is received, unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it is not made for political purposes. An expenditure made at the behest of a candidate, committee or elected officer is a contribution to the candidate, committee or elected officer unless full and adequate consideration is received for making the expenditure.
1. Contribution includes the purchase of tickets for events such as dinners, luncheons, rallies and similar fundraising events; the granting of credit other than in the normal course of business; the granting of discounts or rebates not extended to the public generally or the granting of discounts or rebates by television and radio stations and newspapers not extended on an equal basis to all candidates for the same office; and the payment of compensation by any person for the personal services or expenses of any other person if such services are rendered or expenses incurred on behalf of a candidate or committee without payment of full and adequate consideration.
2. Contribution shall further include any payment received by a committee from another committee.
3. Contribution shall not include amounts received pursuant to an enforceable promise to the extent such amounts have been previously reported as a contribution.
4. Contributions shall not include the cost of an event held in honor or on behalf of a candidate or committee when the total cost of the event amounts to no more than $475.00 and when the event is not held for the purpose of obtaining contributions to the candidate or committee.
5. Notwithstanding the foregoing definition, contribution shall not include volunteer personal services or payments made by an individual for his or her own travel expenses if such payments are made voluntarily without any understanding or agreement that they shall be, directly or indirectly, repaid to him or her. Further, contribution shall not include an independent expenditure.
6. A candidate’s own money or property used on behalf of his or her candidacy shall not be considered a contribution.
“Contribution period” means any calendar year in which the candidate is the defendant or respondent in a bona fide legal action, either civil, administrative, or criminal, arising from the candidate’s status as a candidate or incumbent officeholder. Each calendar year shall be a separate contribution period.
“Controlled committee” means a committee which is controlled directly or indirectly by a candidate or which acts jointly with a candidate or controlled committee in connection with the making of expenditures. A candidate controls a committee if he or she, his or her agent or any other committee he or she controls has a significant influence on the actions or decisions of the committee.
“Election” means any general or special election held in the City of Roseville, including any recall election.
“Expenditure” means a payment, a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a third party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment, unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it is not made for political purposes. An expenditure is made on the date payment is made or on the date consideration is received, whichever is earlier. “Independent expenditure” means an expenditure made by any person in connection with a communication which expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, or taken as a whole and in context, unambiguously urges a particular result in an election but which is not made to or at the behest of the affected candidate or committee. “Person” means an individual, proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, syndicate, business trust, company, corporation, association, committee, labor union, and any other organization or group of persons acting in concert.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.19
File #: 0400-02
Item ID: 2025-683
Title: Second Reading - Zoning and Subdivision Tolling Provisions - Roseville Municipal Code Amendments
Contact: Lauren Hocker 916-774-5272 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends City Council approve an ordinance for second reading amending Section 18.06.230 of Chapter 18.06 of Title 18 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Time Period of Approvals and adding Section 19.76.140 to Chapter 19.76 of the Roseville Municipal Code to add new Section 19.76.140 regarding Tolling Provisions.
RECOMMENDATION
At the August 28, 2025 Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council:
Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 19.76 of the Roseville Municipal Code to add new Section 19.76.140 regarding Tolling Provisions.
At the August 28, 2025 Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed and provided feedback on the Ordinance Amendments to Title 18 of the Roseville Municipal Code. Staff recommends the City Council take the following action:
Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 18.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Time Period of Approvals.
BACKGROUND
A tolling provision is a clause that pauses a statute of limitations if certain conditions are met. There are many tolling provisions in existing state law related to the expiration of project approvals, particularly for housing development projects (example: Government Code 65914.4). These tolling provisions are usually triggered when an issue that is out of the applicant’s control will delay project construction. The most common issue is when a lawsuit is filed challenging the approval of the project. Lawsuits may take years to resolve, and without a tolling provision, the entitlements may expire during this time period even though the applicant was not in a position to be able to move forward with their project. The applicant then must apply for an extension of the entitlement or a new approval, which can itself be the subject of another lawsuit. Pausing the approval time period for the duration of any lawsuit grants the applicant the time needed for a lawsuit to be resolved.
Evaluation
Section 19.86.050 of the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance requires two findings be made in order to approve a zoning ordinance amendment. The two findings are listed below in italicized, bold text and are followed by an evaluation of the project in relation to the findings.
The project is consistent with the public interest, health, safety, or welfare of the City.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan of the City of Roseville.
Staff is proposing that a tolling provision be added for all project applications approved by the City, which would pause the expiration of a project approval during the time period that a project is or was the subject of a legal challenge. Staff proposes the amendments be retroactive to any project set to expire during this calendar year (on or after January 1, 2025); this term is included in the enacting Ordinance language within Exhibit A. To effect this change, staff proposes adding the language below (underlined italics) and included as Exhibit A.
ADD RMC Section 19.76.140 Tolling Provisions to read as follows: Any approvals granted pursuant to this Chapter shall be tolled, and shall not expire, during the time that any or all such approvals are, or were, the subject of a lawsuit pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.
ADD TEXT to RMC Section 18.06.230 (Time Period of Approvals) to read as follows: Tentative maps shall be initially approved or conditionally approved for 24 months. Within 24 months from the date of approval or conditional approval, the applicant may prepare, submit and record the final map, parcel map or other documents required by this title and the Subdivision Map Act. This 24-month period shall not include the period of time during which a lawsuit involving the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map is, or was, pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.
The proposed tolling provisions will protect applicants from the unreasonable expiration of entitlements during a time period when an applicant is not in a position to effectuate those entitlements. The proposed amendments provide the necessary time for the due process of a legal challenge to be completed, and therefore are consistent with the public interest, health, safety, or welfare of the City and are consistent with the General Plan and the City’s Specific Plans.
Public Outreach
A public notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in the Sacramento Bee and on the Roseville Coalition of Neighborhood Associations (RCONA) website 20 days prior to the public hearing. A public notice of the City Council hearing was published in the Roseville Tribune and on the RCONA website 20 days prior to the City Council hearing. No comments were received.
Summary of Planning Commission Hearing
The proposed amendments were heard by the City's Planning Commission on August 28, 2025 (see Attachment 1, Planning Commission Staff Report). One question was received from the Commission, inquiring about whether these amendments would in any way prohibit an applicant from processing Engineering Permits or Building Permits, or from doing site work during the tolling period. Staff informed the Commission that no, the amendments would not have this effect. An applicant would be able to continue through the permitting process and even to complete site work consistent with those permits, once issued. However, continuing to process permit applications and complete site work would be at the applicant's risk, since the outcome of a lawsuit is uncertain.
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment. There is no advisory body for Title 18, so staff requested the Planning Commission review and comment on changes to Title 18. Aside from the comment addressed above, the Planning Commission had no concerns about the proposed changes.
FISCAL IMPACT
The project has no fiscal impact on the City.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance amendments are policy and proceduremaking activities, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Lauren Hocker, Senior Planner
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 7006
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created -
Greg Bitter, Development Services Department
Mike Isom, Development Services Department
Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department
Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department
ORDINANCE NO. 7006
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION
18.06.230 OF CHAPTER 18.06 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TIME PERIOD OF APPROVALS AND ADDING SECTION 19.76.140 TO CHAPTER 19.76 OF TITLE 19 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
TOLLING PROVISIONS
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The section of the Roseville Municipal Code listed above is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “A”.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption and shall be applicable to any approved project covered by the Ordinance which was set to expire on or after January 1, 2025.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT "A"
§ 18.06.230. Time period of approvals.
Tentative maps shall be initially approved or conditionally approved for 24 months. Within 24 months from the date of approval or conditional approval, the applicant may prepare, submit and record the final map, parcel map or other documents required by this title and the Subdivision Map Act. This 24-month period shall not include the period of time during which a lawsuit involving the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map is, or was, pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.
§ 19.76.140. Tolling provisions.
Any approvals ranted pursuant to this Chapter shall be tolled, and shall not expire, during the time that any or all such approvals are, or were, the subject of a lawsuit pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.20
File #: 0102-06
Item ID: 2025-737
Title: Proclamation - Cybersecurity Awareness Month October 2025 Contact: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Proclaim October 2025 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month in Roseville and officially support the National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, ‘Secure our World’, and the National Public Awareness Campaign, ‘Stop.
Think. Connect.™’, and call upon all employees, residents and visitors of Roseville to become educated about cybersecurity and put that knowledge into practice to keep our connected community safe from cyber threats.
RECOMMENDATION
Proclaim October 2025 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month in Roseville and officially support the National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, ‘Secure our World’, and the National Public Awareness Campaign, ‘Stop.
Think. Connect.™’, and call upon all employees, residents and visitors of Roseville to become educated about cybersecurity and put that knowledge into practice to keep our connected community safe from cyber threats.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Ceremonial documents meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proclamation - Cybersecurity
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 10/7/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/7/2025
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.21
File #: 0600-02
Item ID: 2025-739
Title: Out-of-Country Travel — Greater Sacramento Economic Council, Germany Market Visit Contact: Melissa Anguiano 916-774-5284 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approving an out-of-country travel request for the Mayor, Economic Development Director and Electric Utility Chief Operating Officer to attend a regional delegation to Germany to conduct an industry market visit, led by the Greater Sacramento Economic Council (GSEC). This travel is to leverage opportunities from the Robert Bosch Semiconductor LLC’s (Bosch) expansion in Roseville and is intended to build connectivity between Greater Sacramento and Germany to drive additional investment and jobs into our community. The cost of travel, airfare, lodging, and per diem are estimated to be $6,000 per attendee, for a total of $18,000. There are sufficient funds available in the FY2025-26 General Fund and Electric Fund to cover this cost.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve an out-of-country travel request for the Mayor, Economic Development Director and Electric Utility Chief Operating Officer to attend a regional delegation to Germany to conduct an industry market visit, led by the Greater Sacramento Economic Council (GSEC).
BACKGROUND
In April 2023, Bosch announced its intention to acquire certain assets of the U.S. chipmaker TSI Semiconductors Corporation (TSI Semiconductors), based in Roseville, California. On August 31, 2023, Bosch completed the acquisition of assets of TSI Semiconductors. With this acquisition, Bosch is establishing significant manufacturing capacity in an important market. Bosch’s investment of some $1.5 billion is underway and is transforming the Roseville site into a facility that produces and tests silicon carbide semiconductors, which are a key building blocks for electric vehicles. Starting in 2026, the first chips will be produced on 200-millimeter wafers based on the innovative material silicon carbide (SiC).
Bosch’s investment is a systematic investment in pivotal semiconductor technology and presents momentous potential and opportunities for the future. An investment like this is bringing additional interest from other companies and businesses looking to support growth and jobs in our region.
The Greater Sacramento Economic Council is leading a second delegation to Germany to strengthen connections with players across the semiconductor, clean technology and mobility sectors – targeting key partners including Bosch, SMA Solar, Siemens Mobility, Bayer Crop Science and supply chain players.
This visit will build connectivity between Greater Sacramento and Germany to drive additional investment and jobs into our community.
This market visit will take place between November 29 and December 6, 2025, and will include:
• Meetings with key industry partners in semiconductor, clean technology and mobility sectors to encourage continued expansion in Greater Sacramento.
• Connecting with German companies that already have a presence in the region and participating in new prospect visits to encourage additional U.S. investment in Greater Sacramento. • Attending GSEC hosted reception for Germany industry partners, key suppliers and industry associations.
• Continued advocating for direct flight from Germany to Sacramento through high-level talks with Lufthansa.
To continue building on this economic growth, the City sees value in participating and would like to join GSEC and regional leaders, including the County of Placer, Sacramento International Airport, regional utilities, and educational and workforce partners, to meet with executives in many of Greater Sacramento’s growth sectors, including mobility and clean technology.
FISCAL IMPACT
Costs related to travel, airfare, lodging, and per diem are estimated to be $6,000 per attendee, for a total of $18,000. There are sufficient funds available in the FY2025-26 General Fund and Electric Fund to cover this cost.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15061(c)(3) and §15378. The approval of travel meets the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
3. Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWERS:
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Created/Initiated - 9/29/2025 Cary Camilleri, Economic Development Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/2/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/3/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/3/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/7/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/7/2025
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VI.22
File #: 0102-03
Item ID: 2025-749
Title: Minutes of Prior Meetings
Contact: Melissa Lipp 916-774-5268 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the October 1, 2025 City Council Closed Session Meeting and the October 1, 2025 City Council Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes of the October 1, 2025 City Council Closed Session Meeting and the October 1, 2025 City Council Meeting.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Closed Session Minutes
2. Minutes
REVIEWERS:
Christine Mesaros, City Clerk Department Created -
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Department
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
MINUTES
City Council Closed Session Meeting
October 1, 2025
5:00 PM
City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bernasconi called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Karen Alvord, Councilmember Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember Pauline Roccucci, Mayor Krista Bernasconi III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comment received.
IV. CLOSED SESSION
1. Conference with Labor Negotiator
Summary: Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6 Chief Negotiator: Timothy Davis, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Agency designated representative: Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director Employee Organizations: Roseville Police Officers’ Association; Roseville Firefighters, Local 1592 CONTACT: Stacey Peterson 916-774-5374 [email protected] Closed Session Disclosure: No reportable action taken.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Krista Bernasconi adjourned the meeting at 5:58 p.m.
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
October 1, 2025
6:00 PM
City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bernasconi called the meeting to order at 6:05 PM.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
John Hernandez led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
City Clerk Carmen Avalos announced the procedures for addressing the City Council.
V. PRESENTATIONS
1. Resolution - 2025 Sylvia Besana Community Volunteer Award Summary: Commend Kevin Hernandez as recipient of the City of Roseville 2025 Sylvia Besana Community Volunteer Award.
CONTACT: Jenny Taylor 916-746-1328 [email protected] City Council made the presentation to Kevin Hernandez, who responded.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
Lauren Meeks-Harris - Spoke on the danger of motorized bikes on sidewalks.
Jennifer Chapman - Requested the City assist with a community education event regarding flood hazard mitigation and watershed health.
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Remove Items 6 and 10 from the Consent Calendar, and approve the remaining items as recommended.
The motion Passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
2. Fleet Services Purchase – Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - FLEET) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment authorizing a $162,500 payment from the Highway Users Tax Fund to the Fleet Replacement Fund for the purchase of a truck equipped with a dump body. The new truck will support the Public Works Streets Resurfacing team in carrying asphalt for street construction projects and daily paving operations. The truck will be purchased from the Fleet Replacement Fund and will have no impact on the General Fund.
CONTACT: Lea Schroeder 916-774-5503 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6991 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
3. Gillig Buses - Purchase Order and Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -
TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with Gillig for five (5) 35’ local Battery Electric buses and seven (7) 40’ commuter battery electric buses in the amount of $15,272,655, and authorize budget adjustments in the amount of $8,140,131 to align project funding for the procurement. Funding for the buses will use a combination of federal, state, and local transit funding. No General Fund resources will be used.
CONTACT: Zachary Presley 916-774-5365 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve a purchase order to Gillig for the amount of $15,272,655 for five (5) 35’ Battery Electric buses and seven (7) 40’ battery electric buses; and b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6992 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
4. Asphalt Sealant and Filler - Annual Blanket Purchase Order (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -
STREET MAINTENANCE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with Crafco, Inc. for the purchase of asphalt sealant and fillers. The total estimated cost for pavement patching products is up to $250,000 per fiscal year. Funding is included in the Public Works Department's Street Maintenance Division FY2025-26 operating budget.
CONTACT: James Shelton 916-746-1192 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-308 approving a purchase order asphalt sealant and filler.
5. 2025 Street Condition Assessment and Road Matrix Update - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement and Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - STREET MAINTENANCE) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. in the amount of $109,565, to provide a street condition assessment and Road Matrix database update. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. provides a highly specialized pavement management survey to help determine and plan roadway resurfacing.
Staff is recommending a sole-source contract purchase agreement with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. due to their in-depth knowledge of the City's road network and the Road Matrix software that the City has been using for over 25 years. This allows for cost savings in staff time and investment in the specialty equipment required to perform the survey and data analysis.
Additionally, staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $109,565 to fund the contract. Funding will come from the Highway Users Tax Fund, and no General Fund resources will be used for the project.
CONTACT: James Shelton 916-746-1192 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-303 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Stantec Consulting International LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6993 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
6. Darling Way - Permit Parking Modification (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING -
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval to install residential permit parking on the north side of Darling Way from Clarice Lane to the eastern end of the street. Street parking is impacted due to the nearby school, daycare, and after-school activities, but on-site parking is readily available within the school parking lot. Residential Permit Parking will be in effect 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The cost for installation of Permit Parking signs is already budgeted within the General Fund operating budget.
CONTACT: Carlee Parks 916-774-5454 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-304 approving permit parking areas and repealing Resolution No. 20- 341.
Item removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Bernasconi for clarification.
Assistant Public Works Director Stefanie Kemen made the presentation to the City Council.
Christeen Farley - Spoke in support of parking permits.
Melva Medina - Spoke in support of parking permits.
Dennis Medina - Spoke in support of parking permits.
There was no Motion to Adopt Resolution no. 25-304 approving permit parking areas and repealing Resolution No. 20-341. The Motion failed.
Motion by Councilmember Mendosa, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, for staff to return to a future meeting with alternate solutions. The Motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
7. Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECT'S)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a construction agreement with BRCO Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $577,145 for the construction of a parking lot to serve the soccer fields in Maidu Regional Park and associated budget adjustment to fully fund the construction in the amount $360,000 from the General Fund Capital Reserve Fund. The project will include the construction of 85 parking spaces, including accessible spaces, and will install the necessary drainage facilities for the improvements. Work is expected to begin in late October and be completed by summer 2026.
CONTACT: Nick Bumb 916-746-1313 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-309 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and BRCO Constructors, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6994 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
8. Marketing and Advertising Services - Professional Services Agreements (ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENT - CUSTOMER & GOVERNMENT RELATIONS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of professional services agreements with JSR Strategies LLC and Prosio Communications, Inc. to provide marketing and advertising services for Roseville Electric Utility. The total cost of the initial two-year agreement with JSR Strategies LLC, through
June 30, 2027, will not exceed $340,000. The total cost of the initial two-year agreement with Prosio Communications, Inc., through June 30, 2027, will not exceed $140,000. Funding is included in the Electric Department budget in the Electric Fund.
CONTACT: David Bradford 916-746-1672 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-305 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and JSR Strategies LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-306 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Prosio Communications, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
9. Customer Information System Health Check - Agreement Amendment (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - UTILITY BILLING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the master professional services agreement with N. Harris Computer Corporation to authorize the City of Roseville’s Utilities Customer Care division, to engage Cayenta in conducting a comprehensive systems health check of the City’s Customer Information System. This will increase the total contract amount by $35,000. The amendment will be funded by the Customer Care budget in the Roseville Electric Utility and Environmental Utilities departments.
CONTACT: Jorence Wu 916-746-1261 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-314 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and N. Harris Computer Corporation and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
10. Second Reading - 2025 Building Standards Code Adoption (FIRE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a second reading of an ordinance amending Chapters
16.04 and 16.16 of title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding buildings and construction and the fire code. The fiscal impact on the City includes new code resources and staff training on the updated Building Code Standards. These costs have been accounted for within the current budgets of both the Fire Department and the Development Services Department.
CONTACT: Michael Bradley 916-774-5400 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6997 re-adopting and amending Chapters 16.04 and 16.16 of title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding buildings and construction and the fire code.
Jennifer Chapman removed Item 10 from the Consent Calendar.
Fire Chief Ryan Harrigan made the presentation to City Council.
Jennifer Chapman spoke on concerns on the item.
Motion by Councilmember Alvord, seconded by Councilmember Houdesheldt, to adopt Ordinance No. 6997 re-adopting and amending Chapters 16.04 and 16.16 of title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding buildings and construction and the fire code. The Motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi
11. Microsoft Software Licensing (RFP #12-035) - Purchase Order (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT - STRATEGIC PLANNING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval and authorization for the City Manager to execute a purchase order, and any other documents necessary to facilitate this agreement, for renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for software licensing via Softchoice, an authorized Microsoft Reseller for a three-year agreement. The annual amount of the contract for year 1 is $570,439.97 and years 2–3 are $570,760.95, for a total agreement cost of $1,711,961.87 over the three-year term. Staff also recommends that the City Manager delegate authority to the Chief Information Officer to approve additional costs not to exceed $100,000 per year for the term of the agreement, allowing the ability to cover any changes to the environment during that time, which may be by annual "True Ups" completed with Softchoice.
CONTACT: Christian Barajas 916-774-5431 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No 25-313 approving a Purchase Order for Microsoft Software Licensing.
12. Enterprise Asset Management Support - Contract Purchase Agreement (INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - CLIENT & INNOVATION SERVICES)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Sixty Seven Solutions, Inc. for a one-year period, with two optional renewal years for operational support of the City’s Enterprise Asset Management system. The FY2025-26 cost of $250,000, and two optional renewal years totaling $500,000 in FY2026-27 and FY2027-28, shall be a shared cost among the City departments, within the Information Technology Operations Fund.
CONTACT: Tyler Adams 916-746-1174 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-310 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the
City of Roseville and Sixty Seven Solutions, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
13. Geographic Information System - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - CLIENT & INNOVATION SERVICES)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (Esri) for Geographic Information Systems software maintenance. Since this software is proprietary and developed by Esri, they are the sole source for maintenance and support. The cost for this purchase is $120,300 per year for a total of $360,900 over a three-year term. Staff also requests that the City Council delegate authority to the Chief Information Officer to approve additional costs not to exceed $20,000 per year for the term of the agreement, allowing the ability to cover any additional software or user licensing needs during that time.
CONTACT: Brian Johnson 916-774-5141 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-311 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
14. JM-30 Sierra Vista Apartments - Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement (ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement with Greek Orthodox Housing Corporation for the Sierra Vista Apartments, an affordable rental housing project in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan, located at 4950 Upland Drive. The agreement will support the City's General Plan in meeting the affordable housing goals. No General Fund resources will be used in the development of this project.
CONTACT: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-307 approving an affordable housing regulatory agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Greek Orthodox Housing Corporation and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
15. Staffing Changes (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Local 39 A & B salary schedules reflecting the addition of the Industrial Waste Technician I/II and the deletion of the Industrial Waste Technician; and approve the Management A & B salary schedules reflecting the addition of an Industrial Waste Supervisor classification and a salary adjustment to the Environmental Utilities Compliance Administrator, as part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing levels to provide a high level of service to the community. Most of these allocation changes were
included in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 budget. For the remainder of FY 2025-26, the financial impact of the recommendations to the Wastewater Operations Fund is $4,819.
CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6995 of the Council of the City of Roseville amending Ordinance No. 6920, the salary ordinance for employees represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39, as amended by Appendix "H" to be effective October 4, 2025, as an urgency measure; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6996 of the Council of the City of Roseville amending Ordinance No. 6983, the salary ordinance for Management Employees, as amended by Appendix "L" to be effective October 4, 2025, as an urgency measure; and
c. Approve the attached city-wide allocation schedule effective October 4, 2025.
16. Participation in Nationwide Opioid Litigation Settlement Agreements (CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council approval authorizing the City to enter into settlement agreements with Purdue Pharma, L.P., Alvogen, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Apotex, Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Indivior, Inc., Mylan, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., and Zydus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute the requisite participation and settlement agreements and all other forms necessary to effectuate the City's participation in the settlements. No General Fund resources will be used.
CONTACT: My Tien Doan 916-774-5472 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-315 authorizing the City of Roseville to join the National Opioids Settlement Agreements with Opioid Distributors, Purdue Pharma, L.P., and the Sacklers Family, and with eight opioid manufacturers, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the requisite settlement agreements and all other forms necessary to effectuate the City’s participation in the settlements on behalf of the City of Roseville.
17. Body-Worn Cameras - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Axon Enterprise, Inc. for Body-Worn Cameras with the associated software/hardware bundle. In 2021, the City entered into a five-year agreement with Lenslock, Inc. to supply Body-Worn Cameras (BWC) to the Police Department. This agreement is set to expire in 2026, necessitating the replacement of the current BWC system. After evaluation, the Police Department selected Axon Enterprise, Inc. to continue the Department's BWC program. Axon Enterprise, Inc. is the soleauthorized distributor for all Axon brand products. The total cost of the five-year agreement is $2,529,364.28; the first-year cost for this purchase is $446,175.58. Funding for the first-year cost
was included in the Police Body-worn Camera Replacement project, through the Equipment Replacement Fund.
CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-312 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Axon Enterprise, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
18. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the September 17, 2025 City Council Meeting.
CONTACT: Melissa Lipp 916-774-5268 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the September 17, 2025 City Council Meeting.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VIII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
19. Water Rate Assistance Program - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment (ENVIRONMENTAL
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance approving the addition of Section 14.08.215 to Chapter 14.08 of the Roseville Municipal Code. A Water Rate Assistance Program (WRAP) aligns with state and federal affordability efforts and reflects Roseville’s commitment to ensuring safe, accessible, and affordable water service for all residents. These updates would create a WRAP for income-eligible residents, in compliance with Proposition 218 by using non-rate revenue in the Water Operations Fund for funding. The Public Utilities Commission is recommending that the City Council approve the creation and implementation of the WRAP.
CONTACT: Noelle Mattock 916-774-5504 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce an ordinance for first reading approving the addition to Section 14.08.215 to Chapter 14.08 of the Roseville Municipal Code.
Assistant Environmental Utility Director Brian Craighead introduced Utility Government Relations Administrator Noelle Mattock, who made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to Introduce an ordinance for first reading approving the addition to Section 14.08.215 to Chapter 14.08 of the Roseville Municipal Code. The Motion Passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
20. Campaign Finance Disclosure - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment (CITY CLERK
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Section 2.60.040 of Chapter 2.60 of Title 2 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Campaign Finance Disclosure to align with the Fair Political Practices Commission's semi-annual filing dates and to establish clear election cycle dates for all future Roseville General Municipal Elections.
CONTACT: Carmen Avalos 916-774-5269 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Recommend the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Section
2.60.040 of Chapter 2.60 of Title 2 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Campaign Finance Disclosure to align with the Fair Political Practices Commission's semi-annual filing dates and to establish clear election cycle dates for all future Roseville General Municipal Elections.
City Clerk Carmen Avalos made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Councilmember Roccuccii, to recommend the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Section 2.60.040 of Chapter
2.60 of Title 2 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Campaign Finance Disclosure to align with the Fair Political Practices Commission's semi-annual filing dates and to establish clear election cycle dates for all future Roseville General Municipal Elections. The Motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:
1. Open the Public Hearing
2. Presentation by staff
3. Presentation by applicant or appellant
4. Accept public testimony
5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period
6. Close the Public Hearing
7. City Council comments and questions
8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.
Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.
21. Zoning and Subdivision Tolling Provisions - Roseville Municipal Code Amendments (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING)
Summary: Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 19.76 of the Roseville Municipal Code to add new Section 19.76.140 regarding Tolling Provisions and adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 18.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Time Period of Approvals. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to Title 19 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Roseville Municipal Code to add a new Section 19.76.140 (Tolling Provisions) and staff recommends approval of the amendment to Title 18 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Roseville Municipal Code to modify Section 18.06.230 (Time Period of Approvals) to indicate that the expiration of approved projects shall be paused (tolled) during any time the approvals are or were the subject of a lawsuit. The required findings for the approval of these amendments can be made and the requested action will have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.
CONTACT: Lauren Hocker 916-774-5272 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 19.76 of the Roseville Municipal Code to add new Section 19.76.140 regarding Tolling Provisions; and
b. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 18.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Time Period of Approvals.
Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m.
Development Services Director Mike Isom introduced Senior Planner Lauren Hocker who made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 7:11 p.m.
Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 19.76 of the
Roseville Municipal Code to add new Section 19.76.140 regarding Tolling Provisions; and adopt the two (2) findings of fact and introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 18.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Time Period of Approvals. The Motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Council Member Houdeshedt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
X. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
No public comment received.
XI. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Houdeshedt reported on various community events.
Placer County Transporation Planning Agency meeting - Councilmember Houdeshedt reported on attendance.
Councilmember Alvord reported on various community events.
Councilmember Roccucci reported on various community events.
Northern California Water Association Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported.
Northern California Power Association Annual Conference - Councilmember Roccucci reported.
Councilmember Mendonsa reported on various community events.
Mayor Bernasconi reported on various community events.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Bernasconi adjourned the meeting 7:22 p.m.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VII.23
File #: 0102-16
Item ID: 2025-703
Title: Council Discretionary Funds - Latino Leadership Council Contact: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends Council consider providing sponsorship to Latino Leadership Council, Inc. from Council Discretionary Funds. The Latino Leadership Council is requesting $3,000 for the 2nd annual Dia De Los Muertos event on November 1st and November 2nd in Roseville. This event is free to the public, with celebrations on November 1st at Denio’s Farmers Market from 11:00a.m.-3:00p.m. and on November 2nd at Vernon Street Town Square from 1:00p.m.-6:00p.m. Last year, the City Council awarded the Latino Leadership Council $500 for this event. The balance in the Council Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $20,821.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council consider providing sponsorship to Latino Leadership Council, Inc. from Council Discretionary Funds for $3,000 for the 2nd annual Dia De Los Muertos event on November 1st and November 2nd in Roseville.
BACKGROUND
The Citizens' Benefit Fund was established in 1993 with the net proceeds from the sale of the Roseville Hospital. The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, annually appropriate up to 90 percent of the annual earnings of the Citizens' Benefit Fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of the City of Roseville. The City Council, without the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commissiont, may annually appropriate a minor amount up to $15,000 of the annual earning for the purpose of improving the quality of life in Roseville.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Annually, the Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer allocates $15,000 of the annual earnings to the Citizens’ Benefit Fund per section 4.06.040 in the Municipal Code and includes it in the annual budget along with the Citizens’ Benefit Fund resources available for appropriation each year. These earnings are restricted for the purpose of improving the quality of life for Roseville residents and appropriated by the City Council. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $20,821.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The award of funds meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Heather Blanco, Executive Assistant
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Latino Leadership Council Fliers
REVIEWERS:
Heather Blanco, City Manager Department - City Manager Created/Initiated - 9/17/2025 Heather Blanco, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 9/26/2025 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 9/29/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/30/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 9/30/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 9/30/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/1/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/2/2025
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VII.24
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2025-727
Title: Renewable Energy Credits Power Purchase Agreement Contact: William Forsythe 916-774-5619 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval to execute a 15-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for renewable energy credits with Desert Breeze Solar, LLC. The annual cost of the PPA is approximately $1.5 million. Funding for the PPA will be included in the Electric Department's future budgets in the Electric Fund, and contingent on the City Council's approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a 15-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for renewable energy credits (RECs) with Desert Breeze Solar, LLC.
BACKGROUND
California’s Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) mandates that 60% of retail electricity sales come from renewable sources by 2030, and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045. It further mandates 65% of RPS procurement to be derived from long-term contracts of 10 years or more. This long-term policy framework makes procurement of Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) through 2042 consistent with the state’s clean energy goals.
To support these requirements, Roseville Electric Utility has evaluated various offers from entities through the Northern California Power Agency's request for proposals competitive solicitation. The PPA with Desert Breeze Solar, LLC (a subsidiary Terra-Gen, LLC) is a fifteen-year purchase of Category 1 RECs from qualifying renewable facilities located in California. Under the PPA, Roseville will receive 49,000 RECs annually at a fixed price $31 per REC, with deliveries scheduled from 2027 through 2042. The PPA will cover approximately 7 percent of Roseville’s annual renewable energy needs. Payment is due only after the RECs have been transferred to, and accepted by, Roseville.
FISCAL IMPACT
The annual cost of the PPA is approximately $1.5 million. Funding for the PPA will be included in the Electric Department's future budgets in the Electric Fund, and contingent on the City Council's approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Approval of this PPA meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
William Forsythe, Assistant Electric Utility Director
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 25-332
2. DesertBreezeSolar_Roseville CAT 1 Confirm 251016_PE
3. DesertBreezeSolar_Roseville EEI Cover 251016_PE
REVIEWERS:
Pooja Sharma, Electric Department - Resource Planning & Generation Created/Initiated - 9/24/2025 William Forsythe, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/26/2025 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/26/2025 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 9/26/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/1/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 10/2/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/6/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/6/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/7/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/7/2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25-332
APPROVING A POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AND DESERT BREEZE SOLAR, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, California’s Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) mandates that 60% of retail electricity sales come from renewable sources by 2030, and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045; and
WHEREAS, it further mandates 65% of RPS procurement to be derived from long-term contracts of 10 years or more; and
WHEREAS, to support these requirements, staff is recommending the City enter into a 15-year Power Purchase Agreement for the procurement of Renewable Energy Credits which is consistent with the State’s clean energy goals; and
WHEREAS, a Power Purchase Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Desert Breeze Solar, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
Execution Version
Effective Date: October 16, 2025
Reference: Desert Breeze Solar, LLC / City of Roseville, California TRANSACTION CONFIRMATION (RPS Bundled Electric Energy)
To: Desert Breeze Solar, LLC
From: City of Roseville, California
Desert Breeze Solar, LLC and City of Roseville, California are parties to that certain EEI Master Agreement dated October 16, 2025, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Master Agreement”). This confirmation (“Confirmation”) entered into as of October 16, 2025 (the “Effective Date”) confirms the understanding reached between Desert Breeze Solar, LLC and City of Roseville, California concerning the Transaction described herein and entered into pursuant to the Master Agreement as set forth below. The Master Agreement and this Confirmation shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Agreement”. All provisions contained in or incorporated by reference in the Master Agreement will govern this Confirmation except as modified herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the Master Agreement and this Confirmation, this Confirmation will prevail for the purpose of this Transaction.
PART I.
1. Buyer: City of Roseville, California (“Roseville”)
2. Seller: Desert Breeze Solar, LLC
3. Product: The Product is bundled electric energy, which is comprised of (a) electric energy produced by the Project during the Generation Period (“Energy”) and delivered to the applicable Delivery Point, together with (b) the Green Attributes and Renewable Energy Credits (“RECs”) associated with such Energy, where, as of the Effective Date, (a) and (b) herein as bundled satisfy all of the criteria under Section 399.16(b)(1) of the Public Utilities Code for a Category 1 Transaction (“PCC1”). For the avoidance of doubt, the Product does not include any ancillary services, capacity, or capacity attributes associated with the Project.
4. Project: The Project is comprised of (a) the Primary Facility (if Seller designates a Primary Facility pursuant to Part I Section 5), and/or (b) any Pooled Facility that is separately metered and has a first point of interconnection with the CAISO Balancing Authority. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Seller has the right, but not the obligation, in its sole discretion, to incorporate an integrated energy storage facility (“Storage Facility”) into the Primary Facility (if applicable). Prior to commencing construction on the Storage Facility, Seller will provide Buyer with a revised Exhibit A reflecting the addition of the Storage Facility, which will automatically supersede the prior version of Exhibit A. Seller retains sole discretion to determine when the Storage Facility will accept charging energy and deliver discharging energy.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Product delivered to Buyer in conjunction with Seller’s use of the Storage Facility shall satisfy all of the criteria under Section 399.16(b)(1) of the Public Utilities Code for a Category 1 Transaction. For the avoidance of doubt, any energy discharged from the Storage Facility that does not satisfy all of the criteria under Section 399.16(b)(1) of the Public Utilities Code for a Category 1 Transaction shall not be considered Product hereunder, Buyer shall have no right or obligation to purchase such discharging energy from Seller hereunder, and Seller shall be entitled to sell all or a portion of such discharging energy to one or more third parties and to retain any associated revenue.
5. Primary Facility: On or before January 1, 2027, Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer either (a) designating one (1) of the three (3) optional electric generating facilities described in Exhibit A to be included in the Project hereunder (the “Primary Facility”), or (b) confirming that there will be no Primary
Facility hereunder. If such notice designates a Primary Facility, then such notice shall include a copy of the Primary Facility’s interconnection agreement.
If Seller confirms pursuant to this Part I Section 5 that there will be no Primary Facility hereunder, this shall not be considered a breach or an Event of Default and Seller shall supply the Product from one or more Pooled Facilities for the remainder of the Delivery Period.
If Seller designates a Primary Facility pursuant to this Part I Section 5, then Seller shall within thirty (30) days thereafter submit to Buyer a Milestone Schedule substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 and designating the expected Commercial Operation Date (“COD”) for the Primary Facility (“Target COD”). On or before the first Business Day of each calendar quarter following Seller’s designation of the Primary Facility until the Target COD, Seller will provide Buyer, by email, a completed progress report in the form of Exhibit A-2 to this Confirmation (“Quarterly Progress Report”) updating Seller's progress in achieving the Milestone Schedule as described in Exhibit A-1. After the Target COD, Seller will provide Buyer, by email, a monthly progress report which will be identical in form to the Quarterly Progress Report, on or before the first Business Day of each month until the Primary Facility has achieved Actual COD and commenced delivery of the Product from the Primary Facility to the Buyer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. On or before the Actual COD, Seller shall submit to Buyer all diligence materials with respect to the Primary Facility that are reasonably requested by Buyer to demonstrate satisfaction of the Minimum Project Criteria. As of the Actual COD, the Primary Facility will meet the following requirements (the “Minimum Project Criteria”):
i. Seller will have obtained the Site Control over the Primary Facility site; and ii. Seller (or an Affiliate of Seller) will have executed an interconnection agreement with the Transmission Provider for the Primary Facility.
iii. Have a unique CAISO Resource ID number and be discretely metered by the CAISO; iv. Have a unique WREGIS ID number;
v. Be qualified as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource; vi. Be pre-certified by the California Energy Commission (“CEC”) as eligible for California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard Program
6. Commercial Operation Date: THIS PART I SECTION 6 IS APPLICABLE ONLY IF SELLER DESIGNATES A PRIMARY FACILITY. Seller will provide written notice to Buyer specifying when the Primary Facility actually achieves the Commercial Operation Date (“Actual COD”). As part of such notice, Seller shall identify the specific facility location, CEC pre-certification number, and an update to Exhibit A reflecting a map of the Primary Facility area. As of the Actual COD, and throughout the remainder of the Delivery Period, Seller shall only deliver Product to Buyer from the Primary Facility, except that Seller may elect in its sole discretion to deliver Replacement Product from one or more Pooled Facilities as further described in Part I Section 13(b)(iii) below.
7. Pooled Facilities: Seller has the right, but not the obligation, to (a) add generating facilities to the list of Pooled Facilities from time to time by providing notice to Buyer identifying the generating facility(ies) to be added and providing a revised Exhibit B reflecting such addition, which will automatically supersede the prior Exhibit B, and/or (b) remove generating facilities from the list of Pooled Facilities from time to time by providing notice to Buyer identifying the generating facility(ies) to be removed and providing a revised Exhibit B reflecting such removal, which will automatically supersede the prior Exhibit B. With respect to the Pooled Facilities (if applicable), the Parties acknowledge and agree that (i) Seller will, in its sole discretion, utilize one or more of the Pooled Facilities in order to satisfy its obligations under this Transaction, (ii) Product shall solely be limited to the actual Product identified by Seller pursuant to Part I Section 13(b)(iii) or Part I Section 19(b), generated by the applicable Pooled Facility, and delivered by Seller, in its sole discretion, to satisfy the Contract Quantity in accordance with Part I Section 19 below or to provide Replacement Product in accordance with Part I Section 13(b)(iii) below, and (iii) without limiting Seller’s obligations under Part I Section 13(b)(iii) below, Buyer is not entitled to any additional Energy and associated Green Attributes produced by any Pooled Facility. Seller shall not deliver any Replacement
Product to Buyer hereunder from a facility that is not listed in Exhibit B unless Exhibit B has been updated to include such facility and Seller has provided prior written notice thereof to Buyer in accordance with this Part I Section 7.
8. Additional Criteria: Subject to Part I Section 21 below, during the Delivery Period (or with respect to the Primary Facility (if applicable), commencing on the date on which such items are completed in a timely manner and continuing throughout the remainder of the Delivery Period), the Primary Facility (if applicable) and any Pooled Facility (if applicable) shall meet all of the following Additional Criteria:
i. Have a unique CAISO Resource ID number and be discretely metered by the CAISO; ii. Have a unique WREGIS ID number;
iii. Be qualified as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource; iv. Be certified by the California Energy Commission (“CEC”) as eligible for California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard Program, except as set forth below with respect to the Primary Facility during the Primary Facility Pre-Certification Period; v. Be assigned a unique CEC RPS ID number with an “A” designation, except as set forth below with respect to the Primary Facility during the Primary Facility Pre-Certification Period; Buyer acknowledges that final CEC certification of Primary Facility and assignment of a CEC RPS ID number with an “A” designation for the Primary Facility cannot occur until after the Primary Facility achieves commercial operation. For the period prior to receipt of final CEC certification of Primary Facility and assignment of a CEC RPS ID number with an “A” designation for the Primary Facility (such period, the “Primary Facility Pre-Certification Period”), Buyer will accept Product from the Primary Facility hereunder; provided, however, that if Seller is unable to cause WREGIS Certificates associated with such Product provided during the Primary Facility Pre-Certification Period to be created by WREGIS and delivered to Buyer in accordance with Part I Section 18, then Buyer will not be required to pay for such Product and such Product will not apply for purposes of Part I Section 13 below.
9. Term: This Transaction shall commence on the Effective Date and end when all obligations of Seller and Buyer have been satisfied as set forth herein.
10. Generation Period: The period (a) commencing at the beginning of the day on June 1, 2027, and (b) ending at the end of the day on May 31, 2042.
For the avoidance of doubt, Buyer has no right to any energy or other products produced by (a) the Primary Facility (if applicable) prior to the start of the Generation Period, or (b) any Pooled Facility prior to the start of the Generation Period or after the Actual COD (if applicable), except with respect to Replacement Product that Seller elects in its sole discretion to deliver from one or more Pooled Facilities as further described in Part I Section 13(b)(iii) below. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Seller shall be entitled to sell all or a portion of such energy and other products to one or more third parties and to retain any associated revenue.
11. Delivery Period: The Generation Period plus the additional time period required by the Parties to complete delivery, acceptance, and settlement of all Product sold to Buyer under this Transaction.
12. Delivery Point: The Primary Facility’s or any Pooled Facility’s, as applicable, point of interconnection with the CAISO Balancing Authority modeled by the CAISO as the Pnode as defined by the CAISO.
13. Contract Quantity: The Contract Quantity is comprised of the Firm Annual Contract Quantity set forth in Part I Section 13(a)(i) below for each Pre-COD Contract Year and Buyer’s Fraction of all of the Product produced by the Primary Facility for each Post-COD Contract Year (if applicable). (a) Pre-COD Contract Quantity.
(i) For each Pre-COD Contract Year, Seller shall provide Product from one or more Pooled Facilities, expressed in MWh and delivered to the applicable Delivery Point during such Pre-COD Contract Year based on Settlement Quality Meter Data (SQMD) as described in the CAISO Tariff, in the amount of the Firm Annual Contract Quantity. “Firm Annual Contract Quantity” means 49,000 MWh for each Pre-COD Contract Year, provided that if Seller designates a Primary Facility pursuant to Part I Section 5, then for the last Pre-COD Contract Year, the Firm Annual Contract Quantity volume for such Pre-COD Contract Year shall be equal to the product of (A) 134 MWh, multiplied by (B) the number of days included in such Pre-COD Contract Year. (ii) In the event that (A) the sum of the Product delivered to Buyer in a Pre-COD Contract Year is less than (B) the Firm Annual Contract Quantity for such Pre-COD Contract Year (the amount of such difference being the “Firm Annual Shortfall Quantity”), Seller shall pay Buyer liquidated damages equal to (I) the positive difference, if any, between the Replacement Price and the REC Price, times (II) the Firm Annual Shortfall Quantity for such year (“Firm Annual Shortfall Payment”).
The “Replacement Price” shall be defined as the offer side of the broker quotes reasonably determined by Buyer, but not to exceed seventy-five dollars per megawatt-hour ($75.00/MWh).
Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for Seller’s failure to deliver Product during any Pre-COD Contract Year is the receipt of the Firm Annual Shortfall Payments. (b) Post-COD Contract Quantity. SECTION (b) OF THIS PART I SECTION 13 IS APPLICABLE ONLY IF SELLER DESIGNATES A PRIMARY FACILITY. (i) If Seller designates a Primary Facility pursuant to Part I Section 5, then from and after the Actual COD Buyer shall be the sole offtaker for Buyer’s Fraction all of the Product produced by the Primary Facility, expressed in MWh and delivered to the applicable Delivery Point during the Generation Period based on Settlement Quality Meter Data (SQMD) as described in the CAISO Tariff. For the avoidance of doubt, Buyer has no right to any of the Product produced by the Primary Facility in excess of Buyer’s Fraction of all Product produced by the Primary Facility and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Seller shall be entitled to sell all or a portion of such Product in excess of Buyer’s Fraction of all Product produced by the Primary Facility to one or more third parties and to retain any associated revenue. (ii) The Contract Quantity ranges are set forth below:
Performance
Measurement
Period*
Post-COD Contract
Year**
Expected
Annual
Contract
Quantity
(MWh)***
Minimum
Annual Contract
Quantity
(MWh)***
1 1 49,000 30,000
2 48,853 29,910
2 3 48,706 29,820
4 48,560 29,731
3 5 48,415 29,642
6 48,269 29,553
4 7 48,125 29,464
8 47,980 29,376
5 9 47,836 29,288
10 47,693 29,200
6 11 47,550 29,112
12 47,407 29,025
7 13 47,265 28,938
14 47,123 28,851
15 46,982 28,764
* While the table set forth above includes 8 Performance Measurement Periods, the actual number of applicable Performance Measurement Periods will depend on when the Actual COD occurs, as described in the Performance Measurement Periods definition in Part III. ** While the table set forth above includes 15 Post-COD Contract Years, the actual number of applicable Post-COD Contract Years will depend on when the Actual COD occurs, as described in the Post-COD Contract Year definition in Part III. *** For the last applicable Post-COD Contract Year in the preceding table, each of the Expected Annual Contract Quantity and Minimum Annual Contract Quantity volumes for such Post-COD Contract Year shall be automatically revised to equal the product of (A) the original volume, multiplied by (B) the cumulative percentage set forth in the “Expected Monthly Distribution” table in Exhibit C for all of the calendar months that are included in full in such Post-COD Contract Year.
(iii) Primary Facility Minimum Product Guarantee:
In the event that (A) the sum of the Product delivered to Buyer from the Primary Facility with respect to a Performance Measurement Period, plus the Lost Output for such Performance Measurement Period, is less than (B) the sum of the Minimum Annual Contract Quantity(ies) for the Post-COD Contract Year(s) included in such Performance Measurement Period (the amount of such difference being the “PMP Shortfall Quantity”), then for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after the end of such Performance Measurement Period, Seller will have the right, but not the obligation, in its sole discretion to provide Replacement Product to Buyer in an amount up to the PMP Shortfall Quantity for such Performance Measurement Period, and Buyer shall purchase and receive such Replacement Product at the Contract Price; provided, however, that the Parties acknowledge that the WREGIS Certificates associated with such Replacement Product will be delivered in accordance with Part I Section 18. Seller shall notify Buyer via email if it intends to deliver Replacement Product to Buyer prior to any Energy associated with such Replacement Product being delivered. On a day ahead basis, Seller shall provide a notice via e-mail to Buyer at [email protected] identifying the volume of Replacement Product to be provided and the Pooled Facilities from which the Replacement Product will be provided for the following day, which volumes may be expressed as a percentage of the applicable Pooled Facility’s output. To the extent that Seller does not deliver Replacement Product for all or a portion of the PMP Shortfall Quantity, Seller shall pay Buyer liquidated damages equal to the product of (I) the positive difference, if any, between the Replacement Price and the REC Price, times (II) the difference of the PMP Shortfall Quantity for such Performance Measurement Period, minus the aggregate Replacement Product provided by Seller for such Performance Measurement Period (“PMP Shortfall Payment”). The “Replacement Price” shall be defined as the offer side of the broker quotes reasonably determined by Buyer, but not to exceed seventy-five dollars per megawatt-hour ($75.00/MWh). Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for Seller’s failure to deliver Product during any Post-COD Contract Year or Performance Measurement Period is the receipt of the PMP Shortfall Payments.
(c) Seller's aggregate liability to Buyer hereunder, including without limitation, for any Event of Default of Seller or any Termination Payment due to Buyer as a result of such Event of Default, shall not exceed the amount of the Seller Collateral.
14. Contract Price: The Contract Price is equal to the sum of the Energy Price, plus the REC Price.
REC Price:
$31.00 per MWh
Energy Price:
The Hourly Locational Marginal Price (in the CAISO day-ahead energy market) published by the CAISO for the Pnode for the Primary Facility or the Pooled Facility, as applicable, providing the Product, expressed in dollars per MWh
15. Payments & Settlements
(a) Seller shall invoice Buyer monthly under this Transaction. The invoice shall detail the items specified in this Part I Section 15. Each invoice shall specify the Delivery Month, applicable, date of transfer, quantity and vintage month for the WREGIS Certificates associated with the Product or Replacement Product, as applicable. Within five (5) Business Days after delivery of the WREGIS Certificates associated with the Product or Replacement Product, as applicable, to Buyer’s WREGIS Account, Seller shall provide Buyer with an invoice with respect hereto. Buyer shall not be obligated to pay the REC Price unless and until the associated WREGIS Certificates have been delivered to Buyer’s WREGIS Account. Such invoice shall be due and payable by Buyer on or before the tenth (10th) Business Day after Buyer’s receipt of the invoice and subject to Section 6.3 of the Master Agreement wth respect to disputed amounts. (b) For purposes of the Energy component of the Product and Replacement Product, Seller or Seller’s Scheduling Coordinator will receive revenue from CAISO for the Energy delivered by Seller to Buyer. The Parties agree that Seller shall retain the CAISO revenues received in respect of the Energy delivered by Seller to Buyer in lieu of any Energy Price payment due from Buyer to Seller for such Energy as set forth above. The Parties acknowledge that such CAISO revenues retained by Seller may be greater than or less than the revenues that would have resulted based on the Energy Price published by the CAISO. (c) For purposes of RECs, “delivery” means the transfer from Seller to Buyer of the quantity of the WREGIS Certificates corresponding to the RECs in accordance with the WREGIS Operating Rules. The Parties acknowledge that the creation and delivery of the WREGIS Certificates associated with the Product or Replacement Product, as applicable, may occur after the Energy has been delivered and invoiced, therefore the invoice may contain charges for Energy and WREGIS Certificates which were not generated in the same month(s).
(d) For the RECs component of the Product or Replacement Product, as applicable, the invoice shall include the following information:
(i) Vintage month, quantity, date of transfer, price and monthly charge for the RECs delivered to Buyer pursuant to Part I Section 18;
(ii) Cumulative quantity of RECs delivered to Buyer under this Transaction. (iii) The WREGIS Certificate IDs and date of transfer to Buyer’s WREGIS Account. (iv) Any credits for PMP Shortfall Payments, if applicable.
16. Seller Collateral:
Seller shall provide or post, with or for the benefit of Buyer, credit support within ten (10) Business Days after the Effective Date, in an amount equal to $850,000 (“Seller Collateral”) which may be in the form of (a) a guaranty provided by Terra-Gen Power Holdings II, LLC in form and substance reasonably acceptable
to Buyer (the “TGPH Guaranty”), (b) an irrevocable letter of credit in a form reasonably acceptable to Buyer issued by a major U.S. commercial bank or a U.S. branch office of a foreign bank which is not the Seller (or a subsidiary or Affiliate of the Seller) with a credit rating of at least A- by S&P and A3 by Moody’s and assets of at least $10 billion, (c) cash, (d) a guaranty from a guarantor entity that is acceptable to Buyer and in a form and substance satisfactory to Buyer (other than the TGPH Guaranty), (e) other equivalent security reasonably acceptable to Buyer, or (f) a combination of the foregoing set forth in clauses (a) through (e). Upon Seller’s initial posting of the Seller Collateral and at all times thereafter during the remaining Term, Seller shall maintain the Seller Collateral in the amount set forth in the table below. Prior to each permitted reduction in Seller Collateral, Seller shall send written notice to Buyer notifying Buyer of such reduction. In the event that Seller Collateral is provided in the form of a guaranty pursuant to clause (d) of this Part I Section 16 and there is a negative change in creditworthiness of the guarantor entity as determined by Buyer, then Buyer may demand any other form of Seller Collateral set forth above and Seller shall deliver such Seller Collateral within ten (10) Business Days after such demand.
Calendar Year(s) Seller Collateral
2025 through 2031 $850,000
2032 through 2036 $595,000
2037 through 2042 $340,000
17. Buyer Collateral:
As of the Effective Date, Buyer has an Investment Grade Credit Rating. If at any point during the Term, Buyer’s Credit Rating no longer meets the criteria for an Investment Grade Credit Rating, then Buyer shall provide or post, with or for the benefit of Seller, credit support within ten (10) Business Days after ceasing to meet the criteria for an Investment Grade Credit Rating, in an amount equal to the amount set forth in the table below for the then-current calendar year (“Buyer Collateral”) which may be in the form of (a) an irrevocable letter of credit in a form reasonably acceptable to Seller issued by a major U.S. commercial bank or a U.S. branch office of a foreign bank which is not Buyer (or a subsidiary or Affiliate of Buyer) with a credit rating of at least A- by S&P and A3 by Moody’s and assets of at least $10 billion, (b) cash, (c) a guaranty from a guarantor entity that is acceptable to Seller and in a form and substance satisfactory to Seller, (d) other equivalent security reasonably acceptable to Seller, or (e) a combination of the foregoing set forth in clauses (a) through (d). Upon Buyer’s initial posting of the Buyer Collateral and at all times thereafter during the remaining Term, Buyer shall maintain the Buyer Collateral in the amount set forth in the table below. Prior to each permitted reduction in Buyer Collateral, Buyer shall send written notice to Seller notifying Seller of such reduction. In the event that Buyer Collateral is provided in the form of a guaranty pursuant to clause (c) of this Part I Section 17 and there is a negative change in creditworthiness of the guarantor entity as determined by Seller, then Seller may demand any other form of Buyer Collateral set forth above and Buyer shall deliver such Buyer Collateral within ten (10) Business Days after such demand.
Calendar Year(s) Buyer Collateral
2025 through 2031 $850,000
2032 through 2036 $595,000
2037 through 2042 $340,000
18. WREGIS Certificate Delivery:
(a) Seller shall transfer the WREGIS Certificates corresponding to the Product or Replacement Product, as applicable, sold hereunder from Seller’s applicable WREGIS Account to Buyer’s WREGIS Account as described in the WREGIS Operating Rules, and Buyer shall receive such WREGIS Certificates, within fifteen (15) Business Days after such WREGIS Certificates become available in WREGIS, but, subject to Part I Section 21, in no event shall WREGIS Certificates be transferred that are not eligible for the California RPS Program. The transfer of the WREGIS Certificates to Buyer shall be deemed to transfer title to all of the Green Attributes associated with the Product or Replacement Product, as applicable, represented by such WREGIS Certificates hereunder. Since WREGIS Certificates will only be created for whole MWh amounts Energy generated, any fractional MWh amounts (i.e. kWh) will be carried forward until sufficient generation is accumulated for the creation of a WREGIS Certificate. Seller shall maintain records of such carryforwards and provide a quarterly reconciliation report to Buyer upon request. (b) Seller agrees that it is solely responsible for payment directly to WREGIS of any and all WREGIS fees billed to Seller by WREGIS related to the transfer of WREGIS Certificates, including costs that are required to register Seller’s generating unit and WREGIS fees incident to the reporting of generator data to WREGIS. Buyer agrees that it is solely responsible for payment directly to WREGIS of any and all WREGIS fees billed to Buyer by WREGIS related to the transfer and receipt of WREGIS Certificates.
19. Scheduling and Dispatch:
(a) At its sole expense, Seller shall be responsible for providing, or arranging for a third party to provide, Scheduling Coordinator services for the Primary Facility or any Pooled Facility,as applicable, during the Delivery Period. Buyer will take title to the Product at the Delivery Point and Seller, or the Scheduling Coordinator for the Primary Facility or any Pooled Facility, as applicable, shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, all Energy to CAISO. Subject to the requirements set forth herein, Seller may schedule, bid or offer all energy generated by or associated with the Primary Facility or any Pooled Facility, as applicable in Seller’s sole discretion.
(b) On a day ahead basis, Seller shall provide a notice via e-mail to Buyer at [email protected] identifying the volume of Product to be provided by any Pooled Facility (if applicable) for each hour of the following day, which may be expressed as a percentage of the applicable Pooled Facility’s output.
20. Public Disclosure:
Notwithstanding any other confidentiality obligations between the Parties, the content of all public announcements made by Buyer regarding any aspects of this Transaction or the Project shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by Seller and Buyer in advance, provided however, that Buyer may disclose this Transaction to a governmental or regulatory authority to the extent required for Buyer to comply with any regulatory requirements applicable to Buyer (including the California Public Records Act, Cal. Gov’t. Code §§ 7290, et seq.).
21. Change in Law Provision:
If a Change in Law occurring after the Effective Date has increased Seller’s known or reasonably expected costs to obtain, maintain, convey or effectuate Buyer’s use of any Product in accordance with this Agreement (any action required to be taken by Seller to comply with such Change in Law, a “Compliance Action”), then the Parties agree that the maximum aggregate amount of in costs and expenses Seller shall
be required to bear during the term of this Agreement to comply with all of such obligations shall be capped at three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) in the aggregate (the “Compliance Expenditure Cap”). (a) If Seller reasonably anticipates the need to incur out-of-pocket expenses in excess of the Compliance Expenditure Cap in order to take any Compliance Action, Seller shall provide Notice to Buyer of such anticipated out-of-pocket expenses.
(b) Buyer will have sixty (60) Days to evaluate such Notice (during which time period Seller is not obligated to take any Compliance Actions described in the Notice) and shall, within such time, either (1) agree to reimburse Seller for all of the costs that exceed the Compliance Expenditure Cap (such Buyeragreed upon costs (including lost production, if any), the “Accepted Compliance Costs”), or (2) waive Seller’s obligation to take such Compliance Actions, or any part thereof for which Buyer has not agreed to reimburse Seller.
(c) If Buyer agrees to reimburse Seller for the Accepted Compliance Costs, then Seller shall take such Compliance Actions covered by the Accepted Compliance Costs as agreed upon by the Parties and Buyer shall reimburse Seller for Seller’s actual costs to effect the Compliance Actions, not to exceed the Accepted Compliance Costs, within sixty (60) days from the time that Buyer receives an invoice and documentation of such costs from Seller.
(d) Any change in the economic value of any Product provided by Seller to Buyer resulting from any Change in Law shall not affect the Contract Price or Buyer’s obligation to make payments required hereunder.
22. Reporting Requirements
a) General Reporting Obligations
Seller shall provide Buyer with accurate and timely reports related to the delivery of WREGIS Certificates associated with Product or Replacement Product provided to Buyer under this Agreement.
Reports shall be submitted in a format reasonably acceptable to Buyer. b) Monthly REC Delivery Report
With each monthly invoice, Seller shall provide a REC Delivery Report including the following:
i. The quantity of RECs delivered during the month (in MWh) ii. Hourly generation of the Primary Facility (in MWh), if applicable iii. The applicable vintage month for each REC
iv. The date of transfer into Buyer’s WREGIS Account
v. If applicable, a list of Pooled Facilities that provided Product or Replacement Product during the month
vi. If applicable, for each Pooled Facility that provided Product or Replacement Product during the month, hourly generation of such Pooled Facility for the hours in which such Product or Replacement Product was provided
All time-stamped data provided by Seller under this Agreement shall be reported in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Subject to Part I Section 21, Seller shall cooperate reasonably with Buyer to provide any documentation in Seller’s possession and not separately available to Buyer that is necessary for Buyer to comply with any updated California RPS reporting requirements and standards issued by the California Energy Commission or California Public Utilities Commission during the Delivery Term that are applicable to this Transaction.
PART II. ADDITIONAL TERMS:
1. Seller, and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that throughout the Delivery Period of this Agreement that: (i) the Project qualifies and is certified or pre-certified by the CEC as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource (“ERR”) as such term is defined in Public Utilities Code Section 399.12 or Section 399.16; and (ii) the Project’s output delivered to Buyer qualifies under the requirements of the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. To the extent a Change in Law occurs after execution of this Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to be materially false or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller has used commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such Change in Law. [STC 6] The term “commercially reasonable efforts” as used in this Part II Section 1 shall not require Seller to incur out-of-pocket expenses in excess of the Compliance Expenditure Cap.
2. Seller shall promptly notify Buyer of any changes in the Primary Facility’s (if applicable) ERR status or RPS eligibility, including regulatory actions or operational issues resulting in a change in the Primary Facility’s (if applicable) ERR status or RPS eligibility, and, subject to Part I Section 21, take all necessary actions, at Seller’s expense, to restore compliance within thirty (30) Business Days. Subject to Part I Section 21, failure to maintain RPS eligibility of the Primary Facility (if applicable) for more than thirty (30) Business Days shall constitute an Event of Default.
3. Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights and duties of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and construed, enforced and performed in accordance with the laws of the state of California, without regard to principles of conflicts of law. To the extent enforceable at such time, each party waives its respective right to any jury trial with respect to any litigation arising under or in connection with this Agreement. [STC 17].
4. Seller and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that throughout the Delivery Period of this Agreement the Renewable Energy Credits transferred to Buyer conform to the definition and attributes required for compliance with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard, as set forth in California Public Utilities Commission Decision 08-08-028, and as may be modified by subsequent decision of the California Public Utilities Commission or by subsequent legislation. To the extent a Change in Law occurs after execution of this Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to be materially false or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller has used commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such Change in Law. [STC REC-1] The term “commercially reasonable efforts” as used in this Part II Section 3 shall not require Seller to incur out-of-pocket expenses in excess of the Compliance Expenditure Cap.
5. Seller warrants that all necessary steps to allow the Renewable Energy Credits transferred to Buyer to be tracked in the Western Renewable Energy Generation Information System will be taken prior to the first delivery under the contract. [STC REC-2]
6. Seller shall notify Buyer within five (5) Business Days after becoming aware of any issues affecting WREGIS Certificate tracking associated with Product provided to Buyer hereunder, and the Parties shall cooperate reasonably to resolve such issues.
7. Green Attributes. Seller hereby provides and conveys all Green Attributes associated with all electricity generation sold to Buyer hereunder from the Project to Buyer as part of the Product being delivered.
Seller represents and warrants that Seller holds the rights to all Green Attributes from the Project, and Seller agrees to convey and hereby conveys all such Green Attributes associated with all electricity generation sold to Buyer hereunder to Buyer as included in the delivery of the Product from the Project.
8. Assignment. Neither Party shall assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, that (x) Seller shall have the right to assign this Agreement to an affiliate without Buyer’s consent, and (y)
Seller shall have the right at any time and from time to time to create or provide for a security interest in, or convey in trust its respective rights, titles and interests in this Agreement to a lender, mortgagee, or trustee under deeds of trust, mortgages or indentures, or to secured parties under a security agreement as security for its present or future bonds or other obligations or securities, or to any lender(s), lessor(s) or tax equity investor(s) and other parties providing any financing or refinancing and any successor(s) or assigns thereto ("Secured Party") with respect to the Primary Facility, without the consent of the other Party, and without such Secured Party assuming or becoming in any respect obligated to perform any of the obligations of the Parties hereto. Any such Secured Party and any successor thereof by action of law or otherwise, and any purchaser, transferee or assignee of any thereof may, without need for the prior consent of the other Party, succeed to and acquire all the rights, titles and interests of Seller in this Agreement, and may foreclose upon said rights, titles and interests of Seller, provided any such Secured Party and any successor thereof by action of law or otherwise, and any purchaser, transferee or assignee of any thereof (a) (i) owns the Project or (ii) has contractual rights to the Product produced by the Project, (b) (i) has equal or greater creditworthiness as compared to Seller as determined by Buyer using commercially reasonable credit standards or (ii) is a Qualified Transferee, (c) has agreed in writing to be bound by this Agreement, and (d) shall have complied with the obligations of Seller to provide Seller Collateral.Upon the written request of either Party, the other Party shall execute, or arrange for the delivery of, such certificates, opinions, estoppels and other documents as may be reasonably necessary in order for the requesting Party to consummate any financing or refinancing of the Project or any part thereof, including a form of financing party consent and agreement, each of which documents and instruments shall be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the cooperating Party.
9. Documentation. Subject to Part I Section 21, Seller shall cooperate reasonably with Buyer to provide Buyer
(a) any documentation in Seller’s possession and not separately available to Buyer that is necessary for Buyer to support and verify that any applicable delivery requirements for this Transaction have been met according to California RPS requirements under the CEC RPS Eligibility Guidebook (9th Ed.), as may be subsequently modified by the CEC during the Delivery Term, and (b) such data and information in Seller’s possession and not separately available to Buyer as may be necessary for Buyer to complete all forms required by the CPUC or CEC in connection with compliance to verify that the Product sold hereunder meets the requirement and will qualify as PCC1 Product.
PART III. ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS:
“Buyer’s Fraction” means the quotient, expressed as a percentage, of (a) seventeen (17) MW, divided by (b) the capacity set forth in Exhibit A for the applicable Primary Facility designated by Seller (if applicable). “Buyer’s WREGIS Account” means the WREGIS account in the name of City of Roseville. “CAISO” means the California Independent System Operator Corporation or any successor entity performing similar functions.
“CAISO Balancing Authority” means the CAISO Balancing Authority as identified in Section 3.5.1.1.1. of CPUC Decision 11-12-052.
“CAISO Tariff” means the California Independent System Operator Corporation, Fifth Replacement FERC Electric Tariff (Open Access Transmission Tariff), as it may be amended, supplemented or replaced (in whole or in part) from time to time.
“Contract Year” means a Pre-COD Contract Year or a Post-COD Contract Year, as applicable. “CPUC” means the California Public Utilities Commission or any successor entity performing similar functions.
“California Renewables Portfolio Standard” or “California RPS Program” means the renewable energy program and policies established by California State Senate Bills 1078, 107 and X1-2, 350, codified in California Public Utilities Code Sections 399.11 through 399.32 and California Public Resources Code Sections 25740 through 25751, as such provisions are amended or supplemented from time to time, including without limitation all applicable eligibility criteria and requirements thereof in force and effect, as jointly administered by the CEC and the California Public Utilities Commission. “Category 1 Transaction” means procurement of product that qualifies under the California RPS Program and satisfies the portfolio content category requirements under Public Utilities Code Section 399.16(b)(1) as adopted in Senate Bill X1-2, enacted on April 12, 2011 in the First Extraordinary Session of the Legislature, and as implemented by the CPUC pursuant to CPUC Rulemaking 11-05-005. “Change in Law” means any addition, amendment, decision, ruling, order, or binding interpretation by or of a governmental authority, to or regarding any laws, rules, regulations, orders, or judicial precedent, that applies to the California RPS Program, California’s cap-and-trade program, or any other applicable environmental, renewable energy, or greenhouse gas emissions program or regulation, that is enacted, issued or becomes legally effective after the Effective Date and materially affects the California RPS Program or Category 1 Transactions or compliance of the Product with the California RPS Program or Category 1 Transaction requirements.
“Commercial Operation Date” means the date specified by Seller as the Commercial Operation Date in a notice provided to Buyer.
“Eligible Renewable Energy Resource” or “ERR” has the meaning set forth in California Public Utilities Code Section 399.12 and California Public Resources Code Section 25741, as either code provision is amended or supplemented from time to time.
“Green Attributes” means any and all credits, benefits, emissions reductions, offsets, and allowances, howsoever entitled, attributable to the generation from the Project, and its avoided emission of pollutants.
Green Attributes include but are not limited to Renewable Energy Credits, as well as: (1) any avoided emission of pollutants to the air, soil or water such as sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and other pollutants; (2) any avoided emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) that have been determined by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or otherwise by law, to contribute to the actual or potential threat of altering the Earth’s climate by trapping heat in the atmosphere1; (3) the reporting rights to these avoided emissions, such as Green Tag Reporting Rights. Green Tag Reporting Rights are the right of a Green Tag Purchaser to report the ownership of accumulated Green Tags in compliance with federal or state law, if applicable, and to a federal or state agency or any other party at the Green Tag Purchaser’s discretion, and include without limitation those Green Tag Reporting Rights accruing under Section 1605(b) of The Energy Policy Act of 1992 and any present or future federal, state, or local law, regulation or bill, and international or foreign emissions trading program. Green Tags are accumulated on a MWh basis and one Green Tag represents the Green Attributes associated with one (1) MWh of Energy. Green Attributes do not include (i) any energy, capacity, reliability or other power attributes from the Project, (ii) production tax credits associated with the construction or operation of the Project, and other financial incentives in the form of credits, reductions, or allowances associated with the Project, that are applicable to a state or federal income taxation obligation, (iii) fuelrelated subsidies or “tipping fees” that may be paid to Seller to accept certain fuels, or local subsidies received by the generator for the destruction of particular preexisting pollutants or the promotion of local environmental benefits, or (iv) emission reduction credits encumbered or used by the Project, for 1 Avoided emissions may or may not have any value for GHG compliance purposes. Although avoided emissions are included in the list of Green Attributes, this inclusion does not create any right to use those avoided emissions to comply with any GHG regulatory program.
compliance with local, state, or federal operating and/or air quality permits. If the Project, is a biomass or biogas facility and Seller receives any tradable Green Attributes based on the greenhouse gas reduction benefits or other emission offsets attributed to its fuel usage, it shall provide Buyer with sufficient Green Attributes to ensure that there are zero net emissions associated with the production of electricity from the Project.
“Investment Grade Credit Rating” means a Credit Rating of BBB- and Baa3 or higher by S&P or Moody’s, respectively, provided, however, that if the Credit Ratings by S&P and Moody’s are not equivalent, then the lower of the Credit Ratings shall control for purposes of determining whether Buyer’s Credit Rating is an Investment Grade Credit Rating.
“Lost Output” means the amount of energy or associated WREGIS Certificates, expressed in MWh, that the Project would have produced and delivered to Buyer but was unable to produce or deliver due to Force Majeure, Buyer’s failure to perform its obligations hereunder, or a curtailment by CAISO or the Transmission Provider. To the extent there is Lost Output due to a curtailment by the CAISO or Transmission Provider, the amount of energy or associated WREGIS Certificates that the Project would have produced and delivered to Buyer must be supported by the Project’s expected availability and the expected solar irradiance during the period of curtailment to Buyer’s reasonable satisfaction. “Performance Measurement Period” means each period of two (2) consecutive Post-COD Contract Years, calculated on a discrete basis (e.g., Contract Years 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, etc.); provided that if there is an odd number of Post-COD Contract Years, then the final Performance Measurement Period will be comprised of the last three (3) Post-COD Contract Years. For the avoidance of doubt, if Actual COD does not occur by the end of the Generation Period, then there will be no Performance Measurement Periods. “Pooled Facility” shall mean each of the facilities listed in Exhibit B. “Post-COD Contract Year” means a period of twelve (12) consecutive months during the portion of the Generation Period after Actual COD (if applicable), with the first Post-COD Contract Year commencing on Actual COD and each subsequent Post-COD Contract Year commencing on the anniversary of the Actual COD; provided that the final Post-COD Contract Year will commence on the applicable anniversary of the Actual COD and end at the end of the day on the last day of the Generation Period. For the avoidance of doubt, if Actual COD does not occur by the end of the Generation Period, then there will be no Post-COD Contract Years.
“Pre-COD Contract Year” means a period of twelve (12) consecutive months during the portion of the Generation Period prior to Actual COD (if applicable), with the first Pre-COD Contract Year commencing at the beginning of the first day of the Generation Period and each subsequent Pre-COD Contract Year commencing on the anniversary of the start of the Generation Period; provided that the final Pre-COD Contract Year shall commence on the start of the Generation Period (if the first Pre-COD Contract Year is also the last Pre-COD Contract Year) or the applicable anniversary of the start of the Generation Period and end at the end of the day prior to the Actual COD (if applicable) or the end of the day on the last day of the Generation Period (if Actual COD does not occur by the end of the Generation Period). “Qualified Transferee” means an entity that has, or is controlled by another person that has, a tangible net worth of not less than fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) or a Credit Rating of at least BBB- from S&P or Baa3 from Moody’s.
“Renewable Energy Credit” or “REC” means a renewable energy credit as defined by and in accordance with Section 399.12(h) of the California Public Utilities Code. “Replacement Product” means the Product being delivered by Seller to Buyer on or after the Actual COD (if applicable) and that is produced by a Pooled Facility. “Scheduling Coordinator” has the meaning set forth in the CAISO Tariff.
“Site Control” means that Seller: (a) owns the Primary Facility site; (b) is the lessee under one or more site leases with respect to the Primary Facility site, which, in each case, permits Seller to perform its obligations under this Agreement; (c) is the grantee of one or more easements or rights of way with respect to the Primary Facility site, if applicable and required for the construction and operation of the Primary Facility; or (d) has entered into one or more option agreements pursuant to which Seller has the right to exercise options to own or lease the Primary Facility site or become a grantee of an easement or right of way with respect to the facility site, so as to permit Seller to perform its obligations under this Agreement. All such rights must be adequate to enable the performance of Seller’s obligations under this Agreement . “Transmission Provider” means Southern California Edison Company. “WECC” means the Western Electricity Coordinating Council or successor agency. “WREGIS” means Western Renewable Energy Generation Information System or any successor renewable energy tracking program.
“WREGIS Certificate” means “Certificate” as defined by WREGIS in the WREGIS Operating Rules and designated by law as eligible for complying with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard and for evidencing the Green Attributes associated with the Product. “WREGIS Operating Rules” means those operating rules and requirements adopted by WREGIS, as subsequently amended, supplemented or replaced (in whole or in part) from time to time.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Confirmation to be duly executed as of the Effective Date.
Desert Breeze Solar, LLC City of Roseville, California
By: By:
Name: Gustavo E. Luna Name:
Title: Chief Marketing Officer Title:
Date: 9/24/2025 Date:
EXHIBIT A
Primary Facility Description
I. Option 1:
Facility Description:
The Lockhart III solar project, an approximately 125 MWac solar photovoltaic generating facility to be developed and constructed by Seller or its Affiliate, located near Barstow, CA.
II. Option 2:
Facility Description:
The Lockhart IV solar project, an approximately 80 MWac solar photovoltaic generating facility to be developed and constructed by Seller or its Affiliate, located near Barstow, CA.
III. Option 3:
Facility Description:
The Edwards Sanborn Enterprise solar project, an approximately 368 MWac solar photovoltaic generating facility to be developed and constructed by Seller or its Affiliate, located near Mojave, CA.
EXHIBIT A-1
Milestone Schedule
(if applicable)
Milestone Date for Completion
Evidence of Site Control
Seller’s receipt of Phase I and Phase II Interconnection study results for Seller’s Interconnection Facilities
Executed Interconnection Agreement
Expected Construction Start Date
Initial Synchronization
Expected Commercial Operation Date
EXHIBIT A-2
Form of Progress Report
(if applicable)
Each Progress Report must include the following items:
1. Primary Facility description.
2. Description of any material planned changes to the Primary Facility.
3. Summary of material activities during the previous calendar quarter or month, as applicable.
4. Forecast of material activities scheduled for the current calendar quarter.
5. List of issues that are likely to potentially affect Seller’s Milestones.
6. A status report of material start-up activities including a forecast of material activities ongoing and after start-up, a report on Primary Facility performance including performance projections for the next twelve (12) months.
7. Pictures, in sufficient quantity and of appropriate detail, in order to document construction and startup progress of the Primary Facility, the interconnection into the Transmission System and all other interconnection utility services.
8. Any other documentation reasonably requested by Buyer.
EXHIBIT B
List of Pooled Facility(ies)
Unit Name: Ridgetop I
RPS ID: 60375A
CAISO Resource ID ENWIND_2_WIND2
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Cameron Ridge
RPS ID: 60392A
CAISO Resource ID ENWIND_2_WIND1
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Altwind
RPS ID: 60402A and 60403A
CAISO Resource ID ALTWD_2_AT3WD3
Facility Location: County Riverside
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: San Gorgonio East
RPS ID: 63228A
CAISO Resource ID GARNET_2_WIND3
Facility Location: County Riverside
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Oak Creek
RPS ID: 60429A
CAISO Resource ID OAKWD_6_QF
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Unit Name: Mojave 16/17/18
RPS ID: 60397A and 60423A
CAISO Resource ID WSTWND_2_M89WD2
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Mojave 3/4/5
RPS ID: 60422A
CAISO Resource ID WSTWND_2_M90WD1
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Cabazon Wind Project
RPS ID: 60736A
CAISO Resource ID CABZON_1_WINDA1
Facility Location: County Riverside
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Whitewater Hill Wind Partners
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Morwind
RPS ID: 60380A
CAISO Resource ID MORWD_6_QF
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Ridgetop II
RPS ID: 60407A
CAISO Resource ID FLOWD_2_RT2WD2
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
RPS ID: 60737A
CAISO Resource ID WHTWTR_1_WINDA1
Facility Location: County Riverside
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Zephyr Park
RPS ID: 60374A
CAISO Resource ID OAKWD_6_ZEPHWD
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
Unit Name: Sanborn Solar 2 Edwards 5
RPS ID: 65034A
CAISO Resource ID EDWARD_2_ESSSB1
Facility Location: County Kern
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Solar Hybrid
Unit Name: Lockhart Solar 1
RPS ID: 65108A
CAISO Resource ID LCKHT1_2_LH1SR1
Facility Location: County San Bernardino
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Solar
Unit Name: Lockhart Solar 2
RPS ID: 65109A
CAISO Resource ID LCKHT1_2_LH1SR2
Facility Location: County San Bernardino
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Solar
Unit Name: Phoenix
RPS ID: 62898A
CAISO Resource ID GARNET_2_WIND1
Facility Location: County Riverside
Facility Location: State California
Facility Location: Country U.S.A.
Facility(ies) Directly Interconnected to a CBA Yes
Facility Fuel Type Wind
EXHIBIT C
Expected Monthly Distribution
Month
Expected % of Expected
Generation
January 5.0
February 5.9
March 8.8
April 9.8
May 11.1
June 11.3
July 11.1
August 10.5
September 8.9
October 7.5
November 5.6
December 4.5
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association
MASTER POWER PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
COVER SHEET
This Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Master Agreement” ) is made as of the following date:
October 16, 2025 (“Effective Date”). The Master Agreement, together with the exhibits, schedules and any written supplements hereto, the Party A Tariff, if any, the Party B Tariff, if any, any designated collateral, credit support or margin agreement or similar arrangement between the Parties and all Transactions (including any confirmations accepted in accordance with Section 2.3 hereto) shall be referred to as the “Agreement.” The Parties to this Master Agreement are the following:
Name (“City of Roseville, California” or
“Party A”)
Name (“Desert Breeze Solar, LLC” or
“Party B”)
All Notices: All Notices:
Street: 116 S. Grant Street Street: 437 Madison Avenue, Suite A City: Roseville, CA Zip: 95678 City: New York, NY Zip: 10022 Attn: Power Supply and Portfolio
Administrator
Phone: (916) 774-5510
Facsimile:
Email: [email protected]
Duns: 076119643
Federal Tax ID Number: 94-6000409
Attn: Business Management
Phone: 646-829-3910
Facsimile: 646-829-3901
Duns:
Federal Tax ID Number:
Invoices:
Attn: Settlements Administrator
Phone: (916) 746-1135
Facsimile:
Email: [email protected]
Invoices:
Attn: Accounts Payable
Phone: 661-822-2458
Facsimile: 661-822-2401
Scheduling:
Attn: N/A
Phone:
Facsimile:
Email: [email protected]
Scheduling:
Attn: Operations 24/7 Desk
Phone: 661-822-2440 or 661-822-2441
Facsimile: 661-822-2401
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association Payments:
Attn: Settlements
Phone: (916) 746-1135
Facsimile:
Email: [email protected]
Payments:
Attn: Treasury Department
Phone: 646-829-3920
Facsimile: 646-829-3901
Wire Transfer:
BNK: U.S. Bank
ABA: 121122676
ACCT: 153499281092
Account of: City of Roseville– Concentration
Account
Wire Transfer:
To be updated
Credit and Collections:
Attn: Energy Risk Supervisor
Phone: (916) 746-1670
Facsimile:
Email: [email protected]
Credit and Collections:
Attn: Treasury Department
Phone: 646-829-3920
Facsimile: 646-829-3901
With additional Notices of an Event of Default
or Potential Event of Default to:
Attn: Electric Utility Director
Phone:
Facsimile:
Email: [email protected]
With additional Notices of an Event of
Default or Potential Event of Default to:
Attn: General Counsel
Phone: 646-829-3908
Facsimile: 646-829-3901
The Parties hereby agree that the General Terms and Conditions are incorporated herein, and to the following provisions as provided for in the General Terms and Conditions:
Party A Tariff Tariff Not Applicable Dated Docket Number Party B Tariff Tariff Dated Docket Number
Article Two
Transaction Terms and
Conditions
Optional provision in Section 2.4. If not checked,
inapplicable.
Article Four
Remedies for Failure
to Deliver or Receive
Accelerated Payment of Damages. If not checked,
inapplicable.
Article Five Cross Default for Party A:
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association Events of Default; Remedies Party A: Cross Default Amount Other
Entity:______________
Cross Default Amount $
Cross Default for Party B:
Party B: Cross Default Amount $
Other Entity: Cross Default Amount
5.6 Closeout Setoff
Option A (Applicable if no other selection is made.)
Option B
Option C (No Setoff)
Article 8 8.1 Party A Credit Protection:
Credit and Collateral
Requirements
(a) Financial Information:
Option A
Option B Specify: ___________
Option C Specify: None
(b) Credit Assurances:
Not Applicable
Applicable
(c) Collateral Threshold:
Not Applicable
Applicable
If applicable, complete the following:
Party B Collateral Threshold: $ __________; provided,
however, that Party B’s Collateral Threshold shall be zero if an Event of Default or Potential Event of Default with respect to Party B has occurred and is continuing.
Party B Independent Amount: $
Party B Rounding Amount: $
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association (d) Downgrade Event:
Not Applicable
Applicable
If applicable, complete the following:
It shall be a Downgrade Event for Party B if Party B’s Credit Rating falls below __________ from S&P or
__________ from Moody’s or if Party B is not rated
by either S&P or Moody’s
Other:
Specify:
(e) Guarantor for Party B: Not Applicable
Guarantee Amount: Not Applicable
8.2 Party B Credit Protection:
(a) Financial Information:
Option A
Option B Specify: ___________
Option C Specify:
(b) Credit Assurances:
Not Applicable
Applicable
(c) Collateral Threshold:
Not Applicable
Applicable
If applicable, complete the following:
Party A Collateral Threshold: $ __________; provided,
however, that Party A’s Collateral Threshold shall be zero if an Event of Default or Potential Event of Default with respect to Party A has occurred and is continuing.
Party A Independent Amount: $
Party A Rounding Amount: $
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association (d) Downgrade Event:
Not Applicable
Applicable
If applicable, complete the following:
It shall be a Downgrade Event for Party A if Party A’s Credit Rating falls below __________ from S&P or
__________ from Moody’s or if Party A is not rated
by either S&P or Moody’s
Other:
Specify:
(e) Guarantor for Party A: Not Applicable
Guarantee Amount: Not Applicable
Article 10
Confidentiality Confidentiality
Applicable
If not checked, inapplicable.
Schedule M
Party A is a Governmental Entity or Public Power System Party B is a Governmental Entity or Public Power System Add Section 3.6. If not checked, inapplicable
Add Section 8.6. If not checked, inapplicable
Other Changes 1) In Section 1.3, insert the phrase “and, in the case of any such petition instituted or presented against it, that petition remains undismissed and unstayed for a period of ninety (90) days” at the end of clause “(i)”.
2) In Section 1.12, (a) delete the word “issues” in the fourth line and replace it with “issuers” and (b) insert “and if such ratings are different, the lowest of such ratings shall apply” after the word “Sheet” in the last line.
3) Section 1.23 "Force Majeure" shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
"Force Majeure" means any cause or event beyond the
reasonable control of the affected Party and not due to the negligence of the Party affected, and which could not have been avoided by due diligence and use of reasonable
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association efforts, including but not limited to (but only to the extent that the following examples satisfy the foregoing
requirements): (a) acts of God or the elements, such as extreme weather conditions, droughts, volcanic eruptions, lightning, floods, ice storms, tornadoes, landslides or mudslides, earthquakes, or epidemic or pandemic, (b)
fires, explosions, accidents, and (c) war (declared or
undeclared), riots, insurrection, rebellion, acts of the public enemy, acts of terrorism, vandalism, sabotage,
blockades, embargoes, and industry-wide strikes.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, the following shall not constitute Force Majeure: (a) lack of finances; or (b) breakage or malfunction of equipment (except to the extent that such failure was caused by an event that would otherwise satisfy the definition of a
Force Majeure event as defined above); or (c) changes in governmental approvals or the conditions imposed
thereunder or the failure to grant or renew such
governmental approvals. If the Claiming Party is a
Governmental Entity or Public Power System, Force
Majeure does not include any action taken by the
Governmental Entity or Public Power System in its
governmental capacity."
4) In Section 1.27, delete the word “transferable” in the first line and insert the following after the last sentence:
“The value of the Letter of Credit shall be its principal amount (the “Value”), provided that if the Letter of
Credit expires within thirty days after the date its Value is being determined, its Value shall be zero.
Notwithstanding Article 8, the Secured Party need not
return a Letter of Credit unless the entire principal
amount is required to be returned. If a Party has
delivered more than one form of Performance Assurance
to the Secured Party, when a return of Performance
Assurance is to be made, the Secured Party may elect
which form to transfer.”
5) In Section 1.50, delete the reference to “Section 2.4” and replace it with “Section 2.5”.
6) In Section 1.51, delete the phrase “at Buyer’s option,” from the fifth line, and replace with, “absent a purchase.”
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association 7) In Section 1.53, delete the words “at Seller’s option,” from the fifth line, and replace with, “absent a sale.”
8) In Section 2.1, delete the first sentence in its entirety and replace it with the following: “A Transaction, or an
amendment, modification or supplement thereto, shall be entered into only upon a writing signed by both Parties, provided that signatures of the Parties transmitted by
electronic transmission shall be deemed to be original
signatures.”
9) In Section 2.3, delete the section in its entirety and replace it with the following:
“No Oral Agreements or Modifications. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in this Master Agreement, the
Master Agreement and any and all Transactions may not be orally amended or modified. A Transaction shall be entered into only when it is confirmed in writing in a Confirmation Letter agreed to and signed by both Parties.”
10) In Section 2.4, delete “either orally or” after “agreed to” in the 7th line.
11) In Section 2.5, (a) insert the phrase “the scheduling and trading representatives of” immediately prior to the phrase “the Parties” in the third line, and (b) add the following sentence to the end: “To the extent that one Party records telephone conversations (the "Recording Party") and the other Party does not (the "Non-Recording Party"), the
Recording Party shall, in the event of any dispute, make a complete and unedited copy of the Recording Party’s
tape(s) of all conversations with the Non-Recording
Party’s personnel relating to the relevant dispute available to the Non-Recording Party.”.
12) Add the following to the end of Section 3.3:
"If a Force Majeure event has occurred that has caused a Party (the “Claiming Party”) to claim and receive relief from the performance of a material portion of the
obligations of the Claiming Party hereunder for a
consecutive eighteen (18) months after the date that the Claiming Party first claimed relief under this Agreement as a result of such Force Majeure event, then this
Agreement may be terminated by the non-Claiming Party
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association with no further obligation of either Party to the other Party (other than for payment obligations that were accrued and payable at the time of termination) if such Force Majeure event is continuing."
13) In Section 5.1(a), change “three (3) Business Days” to “five (5) Business Days”.
14) In Section 5.1(b), insert the phrase “and such Party does not fully mitigate the adverse consequences of such false or misleading representation or warranty to the other Party within thirty (30) days after written notice thereof” after the word “repeated” in the last line.
15) In Section 5.1(c), change “three (3) Business Days” to “thirty (30) days”.
16) In Section 5.1(e), insert the phrase “if such failure is not remedied within five (5) Business Days after written notice thereof” after the word “hereof” in the last line.
17) In Section 5.1(h)(v), add “made in connection with this Agreement” after “any guaranty”.
18) Section 5 Declaration of an Early Termination Date und Calculation or Settlement Amount.
Section 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 shall be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
5.2 Declaration of Early Termination Date and Calculation of Settlement Amounts: If an Event of Default with respect to a Defaulting Party shall have occurred and be
continuing, the other Party ("Non-Defaulting Party") shall have the right to (i) designate a day, no earlier than the day such notice is effective and no later than 20 days after such notice is effective, as an early termination date ("Early Termination Date") to accelerate all amounts owing
between the Parties and to liquidate and terminate all, but not less than all, Transactions (each referred to as a
"Terminated Transaction") between the Parties, (ii)
withhold any payments due to the Defaulting Party under this Agreement and (iii) suspend performance. The NonDefaulting Party shall calculate, in a commercially reasonable manner, a Settlement Amount for each such
Terminated Transaction as of the Early Termination Date.
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association Third parties supplying information for purposes of the calculation of Gains or Losses may include, without
limitation, dealers in the relevant markets, end-users of the relevant product; information vendors and other sources of market information. The Settlement Amount shall not
include consequential, incidental, punitive, exemplary, indirect or business interruption damages. The NonDefaulting Party shall not have to enter into replacement transactions to establish a Settlement Amount.
5.3 Net Out of Settlement Amounts. The Non-Defaulting
Party shall aggregate all Settlement Amounts into a single amount by: netting out (a) all Settlement Amounts that are due to the Defaulting Party, plus, at the option of the NonDefaulting Party, any cash or other form of security then available to the Non-Defaulting Party pursuant to Article Eight, plus any or all other amounts due to the Defaulting Party under this Agreement against (b) all Settlement
Amounts that are due to the Non-Defaulting Party, plus any or all other amounts due to the Non-Defaulting Party under this Agreement, so that all such amounts shall be netted out to a single liquidated amount (the "Termination Payment").
If the Non-Defaulting Party's aggregate Gains, on the one hand, exceed its aggregate Losses and Costs, if any, on the other hand, resulting from the termination of this
Agreement, then the net Settlement Amount shall be zero dollars ($0).
5.4 Notice of Payment of Termination Payment. As soon as practicable after a liquidation, notice shall be given by the Non-Defaulting Party to the Defaulting Party of the amount of the Termination Payment due to the Non-Defaulting
Party. The notice shall include a written statement
explaining in reasonable detail the calculation of such amount and the sources for such calculation. The
Termination Payment shall be made to the Non-Defaulting Party, as applicable, within two (2) Business Days after such notice is effective.
5.5 Disputes With Respect to Termination Payment. If the Defaulting Party disputes the Non-Defaulting Party's
calculation of the Termination Payment, in whole or in
part, the Defaulting Party shall, within five (5) Business Days of receipt of Non-Defaulting Party's calculation of the Termination Payment, provide to the Non-Defaulting Party
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association a detailed written explanation of the basis for such dispute; provided, however, that if the Termination Payment is due from the Defaulting Party, the Defaulting Party shall first transfer Performance Assurance to the Non-Defaulting
Party in an amount equal to the Termination Payment."
19) In Section 5.7, (a) delete the phrase “(a)” in the first sentence and (b) delete the following phrase in the first sentence “or (b) a Potential Event of Default”.
20) In Section 6.3, delete “two (2)” in the fifth sentence and replace it with “five (5)”
21) In Section 8.1(a), delete the word “audited” in line three of Option A and replace it with the word “un-audited”.
22) In Section 10.2(viii), add the following after “doing,” in the 7th line:
“nor is it relying on any unique or special expertise of the other Party and it is not in any special relationship of trust or confidence with respect to the other Party,”
23) Section 10.2(ix) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“Each party acknowledges and agrees that (i) certain
transaction(s) hereunder constitute a "forward contract" providing a "contractual right" within the meaning of such terms under Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended (the "Bankruptcy Code"); (ii) it is a "forward contract merchant" within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code
with respect to any transaction that constitutes a "forward contract," (iii) all payments made or to be made by one party to the other party pursuant to this contract constitute a "settlement payment" within the meaning of the
Bankruptcy Code; (iv) all transfers of adequate assurance, prepayment or similar performance assurance by one party to the other party under this contract constitute a "margin payment" within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Codes; (v) each party shall have the "contractual right" to terminate, liquidate, accelerate, or offset the transaction as a "master netting agreement participant" within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code; and (vi) the parties are entities entitled to the rights under, and protections afforded by, Sections
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association 362, 546, 553, 556, 560, 561 and 562 of the Bankruptcy
Code.”
24) In Section 10.6, change “NEW YORK” to
“CALIFORNIA”.
25) In Section 10.8, (a) delete the following “Except to the extent herein provided for” and (b) add the following to the end thereof:
“Each Party authorizes the other Party to affix an ink or digital stamp of its signature to any Confirmation and
agrees to be bound by a document executed in such a
manner. This Master Agreement may be signed in any
number of counterparts with the same effect as if the
signatures to counterparty were upon a single instrument.
Delivery of an executed signature page of this Master
Agreement and any Confirmation by facsimile or electronic mail transmission shall be effective as delivery of a
manually executed signature page.”
26) In Section 10.9, insert the words “copies of” after the word “examine”.
27) In Section 10.11,
(a) add the phrase “Affiliates, actual or potential provider of debt, equity or tax equity financing or refinancing
for or in connection with the development,
construction, purchase, installation or operation of the Project, contractors” immediately prior to the phrase
“counsel, accountants, or advisors” in line four.
(b) add the following at the end of the last sentence: “Party A and Party B acknowledge and agree that this
Agreement is subject to the requirements of the
California Public Records Act (Government Code
Section 7920 et seq.). The Parties may submit
information that is protected from disclosure pursuant
to an exemption to the California Public Records Act.
In order to designate information as confidential, the
disclosing party must clearly stamp or otherwise
identify the specific portion of the material designated with the word “Confidential”. Upon request or demand
of any third person or entity not a party to this
Agreement (“Requestor”) for production, inspection
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association and/or copying of information designated by a Party as
confidential information (such designated information,
the “Confidential Information” and the disclosing
Party, the “Disclosing Party”), the Party receiving such request (the “Receiving Party”) as soon as practical,
shall notify the Disclosing Party that such request has been made as specified in the Cover Sheet so that
Disclosing Party, at its sole expense, may seek an
appropriate protective order or other appropriate
remedy. If the Disclosing Party takes no such action
after receiving the foregoing notice from the Receiving Party, then the Receiving Party shall be permitted to
comply with the Requestor’s demand and is not
required to defend against it. The Parties will agree
upon the information in this Confirmation to be
designated as confidential and will prepare a redacted
version of this Confirmation.”
28) The following Mobile-Sierra clause shall be added as Section 10.12:
10.12 Standard of Review/Modifications.
(a) Absent the agreement of all Parties to the proposed change, the standard of review for changes to any rate, charge, classification, term or condition of this
Agreement, whether proposed by a Party (to the extent
that any waiver in the next paragraph below is
unenforceable or ineffective as to such Party), a nonparty or FERC acting sua sponte, shall be the ‘public interest’ standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 350 U.S. 332
(1956) and Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific
Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), and clarified by
Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Util. Dist.
No. 1 of Snohomish 554 U.S. 527 (2008).
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of Agreement, and
absent the prior written agreement of the Parties, each Party, to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable
Laws, for itself and its respective successors and
assigns, hereby also expressly and irrevocably waives
any rights it can or may have, now or in the future,
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association whether under Sections 205, 206, or 306 of the Federal
Power Act or otherwise, to seek to obtain from FERC
by any means, directly or indirectly (through complaint, investigation, supporting a third party seeking to obtain or otherwise), and each hereby covenants and agrees not at any time to seek to so obtain, an order from FERC
changing any Section of this Agreement specifying any
rate or other material economic terms and conditions
agreed to by the Parties.
29) The following shall be added as Section 10.13:
Section 10.13 Imaged Agreement. Any fully executed
Agreement, Confirmation or other related document,
or recording may be scanned and stored electronically,
or stored on computer tapes and disks, as may be
practicable (the “Imaged Agreement”). The Imaged
Agreement, if introduced as evidence on paper, the
Confirmation if introduced as evidence in automated
facsimile form, any recording, if introduced as
evidence in its original form and as transcribed onto
paper, and all computer records of the foregoing, if
introduced as evidence in printed format, in any
judicial, arbitration, mediation or administrative
proceedings, will be admissible as between the Parties
to the same extent and under the same conditions as
other business records originated and maintained in
documentary form. Neither Party shall object to the
admissibility of any Imaged Agreement (or
photocopies of the transcription of such Imaged
Agreement) on the basis that such were not originated
or maintained in documentary form under either the
hearsay rule, the best evidence rule or other rule of
evidence. However, nothing herein shall be construed
as a waiver of any other objection to the admissibility of such evidence.
30) Modifications to Schedule M (Governmental Entity of Public Power Systems):
(a) Part A of Schedule M is amended by:
(i) inserting the following definition for the term “Act’s”:
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association ““Act” means Constitution of the State of California,
the California statute(s), charter and municipal
ordinances under which Party B was created, organized
and authorized to enter into this Master Agreement and
each Transaction thereunder.”
(b) Part C of Schedule M is amended by inserting the
phrase “and to the extent applicable,” after the word
“limitation” in clause (i) in the seventh line.
(c) Section 3.4 of Part D of Schedule M is amended by (a) deleting “(i)” from the fourth line; and (b) by deleting sub-section (ii) in its entirety.
(d) Section 3.6 of Part E of Schedule M amended by
deleting the portion of that provision following the
semicolon on the eighth line thereof and inserting the
following in its place:
“any breach of clause (ii) of this provision shall be
deemed to have arisen during a fiscal period of
Government Entity or Public Power System for which
such budgetary approval or certification of its
obligations under this Master Agreement is in effect
and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article Four, an Early Termination Date shall automatically
and without further notice occur hereunder as of such
date wherein Governmental Entity or Public Power
System shall be treated as the Defaulting Party.
Governmental Entity or Public Power System shall
have allocated amounts to its electric department’s fund that are adequate to cover Public Power System’s
payment obligations hereunder throughout the entire
Delivery Period.”
(e) Part G of Schedule M is deleted in its entirety, and the phrase “[intentionally deleted]” is inserted in its place.
Execution Version
Version 2.1 (modified 4/25/00)
©COPYRIGHT 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute and National Energy Marketers Association IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Master Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.
Party A: City of Roseville, California Party B: Desert Breeze Solar, LLC By: By:
Name: Name: Gustavo E. Luna
Title: Title: Chief Marketing Officer
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 10/15/2025
Item #: VII.25
File #: 0110
Item ID: 2025-720
Title: Commercial Corridors Incentive Programs Implementation Contact: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a Commercial Corridors Development Impact Fee Credit Program and a Commercial Corridors Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate Program to incentivize investment and development along the corridors. Commercial Corridors include Douglas-Harding, Douglas-Sunrise, and Atlantic Street. Funding for the programs will come from remaining resources in the Corridor Planning Project in the General Fund, which has a remaining balance of approximately $1.01 million.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution authorizing staff to proceed with implementation of the Commercial Corridors Development Impact Fee Credit Program; and
2. Adopt a resolution authorizing staff to proceed with implementation of the Commercial Corridors Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate Program; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate the implementation of the Commercial Corridors Development Impact Fee Credit Program and the Commercial Corridors Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate Program.
BACKGROUND
In December 2022, the Roseville City Council approved three new specific plans, the Douglas-Harding, Douglas-Sunrise, and Atlantic Street Specific Plans, also known as the Commercial Corridors Specific Plans. The purpose of this specific plan effort was to facilitate commercial reinvestment and redevelopment, housing, and streetscape beautification in the City’s aging commercial corridors. The specific plans allowed for multi-family development in the commercial zones and analyzed utility capacity for up to 850 multi-family residential units across the three plan areas, in addition to creating a unified vision for redevelopment of the original commercial areas of the city.
The preparation of the specific plans was funded by a Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) grant and the General Fund. Following adoption of the specific plans, approximately $1.01 million remains of the $1.2 million of General Fund resources invested in the Corridor Planning Project. Following approval of the specific plans, the Economic Development and Development Services departments partnered to identify feasible uses of the remaining funds and evaluate factors impacting reinvestment in the Commercial Corridors specific plan areas. Through this process, staff vetted programs, marketing opportunities, and the use of available funding to catalyze redevelopment for Council consideration.
As part of this effort, Development Services utilized a portion of the remaining grant funds to prepare conceptual plans and renderings showing the development potential of various opportunity sites within the plan areas. These plans will be used for marketing purposes and can also assist in offsetting early-stage planning costs for developers.
Complementing these efforts, Economic Development directed additional funds toward the preparation of two targeted studies, as summarized below. Both studies were focused on the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise corridors as these areas provide the most opportunity. • Residential Economic Feasibility Study (RSG, June 2024) A robust analysis of the residential market in the specific plans was prepared to identify market capture opportunities, the types of housing opportunities which would best fill those market capture areas, and identify strategies that will attract residential (or mixed-use) developers. As a result of the feasibility study, it was determined that these corridors are not likely to see new housing for 10–15 years, without incentives. Factors contributing to slow growth include high land and construction costs, high interest rates, and lack of available sites. The recommendation for incentives is subsidies for affordable housing and programs that reduce development fees. • Retail Market Analysis & Retail Recruitment Services report (July 2024) An analysis of the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise existing retail market, identification of future retail opportunities, a targeted list of retailers, and recommended marketing incentives. The Retail Market Analysis study found that the area needs aesthetic improvements to attract new retail.
Nevertheless, the retail trade area is large, beyond a 5-mile radius and includes over 550,000 people and has the potential to attract additional retail. Food Service shows the highest potential with an approximately $126M leakage with approximately $113M growth potential by 2029. In order to take advantage of these market opportunities, the recommended actions to encourage reinvestment include educating and engaging property owners and brokers, targeting attraction efforts (especially for new restaurants), reducing impact fees, and offering streamlined communication with the city.
Both studies found that the cost of development is the biggest factor impacting redevelopment.
EVALUATION
Based on the recommendations from the two studies, Economic Development and Development Services are recommending two new programs to help offset the costs of redevelopment in these targeted areas, including a Development Impact Fee Credit Program and a Façade and Frontage Rebate Program.
Development Impact Fee Credit Program
The goal of the Development Impact Fee Credit program is to reduce the overall project costs and attract redevelopment to the Commercial Corridors. Ultimately, enhancing economic vitality, adding square footage, introducing a mix of use types consistent with the specific plans, creating attractive and inviting property frontages/streetscape, spurring other redevelopment projects, and enhancing the overall quality of life for residents and businesses within these areas. The fee credit program would assist in offsetting City-controlled impact fees for projects found to be consistent with the specific plans.
As funds for the program are limited, the program will focus on targeting larger catalyst projects.
Parameters for the Development Impact Fee Credit program are attached and summarized below:
• Eligible projects can include residential, mixed-use, or destination/pedestrian-oriented commercial development on vacant or underutilized Community Commercial (CC) zoned sites within the Douglas-Harding or Douglas-Sunrise specific plans.
• Projects shall demonstrate compliance with the specific plans, demonstrate they will enhance economic vitality (e.g., via job creation, sales tax generation, redevelopment of underutilized sites, or by a significant reinvestment) or they will promote mixed-use or multi-family housing. • Projects meeting the program requirements are eligible for up to $500K fee credit on Citycontrolled fees, not to exceed 2% of the overall project cost. Applicants shall demonstrate a minimum of 25% private investment into the project.
Façade and Frontage Rebate Program
The goal of the Façade and Frontage Rebate Program is to help offset fees associated with improvements to building façades and property frontages. This program is intended to incentivize individual tenants or commercial properties committed to enhancing aging properties or streetscapes.
The Façade and Frontage Rebate Program would be modeled after the existing Downtown Façade Program, except the eligible rebate would increase from $10,000 to $20,000 to account for the larger property frontages found in the Commercial Corridors areas. Consistent with the existing Downtown program, the Commercial Corridors Façade and Frontage Rebate Program could provide a reimbursement for permit fees (up to $1,000) and the cost of materials for exterior improvements. Labor costs are excluded from the list of eligible reimbursable costs. Properties located on a Community Commercial (CC) zoned site would be eligible to apply. Additionally, projects will need to demonstrate consistency with the applicable specific plan design guidelines to be eligible for a rebate.
Both programs will be funded from the remaining $1.01 million in the Corridor Planning Project budget.
Staff is proposing the majority of the funds go towards the Development Impact Fee Credit Program and the remaining amount go towards the Façade and Frontage Rebate Program. Funds for these programs will initially be prioritized for projects located within the Douglas-Harding or Douglas-Sunrise specific plans.
ADDITIONAL EFFORTS AND PROGRAMS TO LEVERAGE
Although not included in tonight’s formal recommendations, additional City programs and efforts have been identified for potential alignment with the proposed initiatives to further enhance incentives and support redevelopment within the Commercial Corridors, including:
1. Marketing & Outreach:
a. A dedicated website showcasing the Commercial Corridors’ advantages, incentives, and opportunity sites roseville.ca.us/corridors.
b. Targeted outreach to property owners, brokers, developers, and businesses. c. Promoting corridor opportunities through participation in industry conferences.
2. Infill Team Coordination:
a. Free Infill Team meetings for potential developers to bring together development review departments early in the design phase to identify issues and streamline processes.
3. Other Development Incentives:
a. Projects in the Commercial Corridors could also utilize the City’s existing Fee Deferral Program and Extended Fee Deferral for Affordable Housing to support project financing. b. A citywide traffic zone and fee study is underway, with Council review anticipated in December 2025. The update may result in reduced traffic fees for redevelopment within the Commercial Corridors.
4. Affordable Housing Funding:
a. Notices of Funding Availabilities (NOFAs) for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and the Local Housing Trust Funds will prioritize affordable housing in the Commercial Corridors.
5. Environmental Utilities:
a. Developing a prioritized Capital Improvement Project (CIP) list that includes upgrades to Water Infrastructure in the Commercial Corridors.
b. Sewer improvements are underway in the Commercial Corridors, with completion expected within four years.
c. Projects in the Commercial Corridors could take advantage of rebate offers for commercial landscape conversion and irrigation upgrades, which can also be paired with the Façade and Frontage Rebate Program for added savings.
6. Roseville Electric:
a. Business and property owners in the Commercial Corridors will be eligible to take advantage of a package of energy efficiency incentives tailored for small and medium businesses with enhanced rebate levels, making energy upgrades more cost-effective, which can also be paired with the Façade and Frontage Rebate Program for added savings.
The proposed incentives represent a strong starting point for promoting activity along our commercial corridors. Staff are optimistic that these efforts will help spark interest in these key areas, drawing attention to their potential as vibrant, thriving centers of community and commerce. Ongoing, staff will continue to seek opportunities and strategies that stimulate and support investment consistent with the vision of the commercial corridor plan areas.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the programs will come from remaining resources in the Corridor Planning Project in the General Fund, which has a remaining balance of approximately $1.01 million.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061 (b)(3)).
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
3. Enhance economic vitality
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Gina McColl, Economic Development Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 25-333
2. Impact Fee Credit Program draft (004)
3. Resolution 25-334
4. Facade and Frontage Improvement Rebate
5. Retail Analysis
6. Residential Economic Study
REVIEWERS:
Gina McColl, Economic Development Department Created/Initiated - 9/24/2025 Cary Camilleri, Economic Development Department Approved - 9/24/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 9/26/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/3/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 10/3/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/6/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 10/6/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 10/7/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 10/7/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 10/7/2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25-333
APPROVING THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEE CREDIT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, in December 2022, the Roseville City Council approved three new specific plans, the Douglas-Harding, Douglas-Sunrise, and Atlantic Street Specific Plans, also known as the Commercial Corridors Specific Plans; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this specific plan effort was to facilitate commercial reinvestment and redevelopment, housing, and streetscape beautification in the City’s aging commercial corridors; and
WHEREAS, the preparation of the specific plans was funded by a Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) grant and the General fund; and
WHEREAS, following adoption of the specific plans, approximately $1.01M remained in the Commercial Corridors specific plan accounts; and
WHEREAS, following approval of the specific plans, staff looked to identify feasible uses of the remaining funds and evaluate factors impacting reinvestment in the Commercial Corridors specific plan areas; and
WHEREAS, staff utilized a portion of the remaining grant funds to prepare conceptual plans and renderings showing the development potential of various opportunity sites within the plan areas and funded the preparation of two targeted studies focused on the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise corridors as these areas provide the most opportunity; and WHEREAS, both studies found that the cost of development is the biggest factor impacting redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, based on the recommendations from the two studies, staff is recommending two new programs to help offset the costs of redevelopment in these targeted areas; and WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Credit Program will reduce the overall project costs to attract redevelopment to the Commercial Corridors with the goal of enhancing economic vitality, adding square footage, introducing a mix of use types consistent with the specific plans, creating attractive and inviting property frontages/streetscape, spurring other redevelopment projects, and enhancing the overall quality of life for residents and businesses within these areas; and
WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Credit Program will assist in offsetting citycontrolled impact fees for projects found to be consistent with the specific plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the implementation of the Commercial Corridors Development Impact Fee Credit Program is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate the implementation of the Program.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
DRAFT Commercial Corridors - Impact Fee Credit Program
Purpose:
Encourage redevelopment within the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise Commercial Corridor Specific Plans, the City of Roseville established a program to offset development impact fee costs for catalyst projects. This initiative helps reduce the overall financial burden on developers while stimulating reinvestment in these key areas.
Goals of program:
Encourage redevelopment of properties in the Commercial Corridors area to enhance economic vitality, add square footage, introduce a mix of use types consistent with the specific plans, create an attractive and inviting streetscape, spur other redevelopment projects, and enhance the overall quality of life for residents and businesses.
Project Eligibility: Redevelopment projects and development of vacant or underutilized Community Commercial (CC) zoned property within the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise specific plan areas that demonstrate a reinvestment may be eligible for development impact fee credits.
Projects shall demonstrate compliance with the program goals and meet the following parameters. 1) Location:
a) Projects shall be located in the Douglas-Harding or Douglas-Sunrise specific plan area and be located on a Community Commercial (CC) zoned parcel; and b) Projects shall be located on a vacant or underutilized site. An underutilized property is one which has not been developed to its maximum potential with a floor area ratio (FAR) of under (30%). Such properties may either include some developed area and some area that remains undeveloped or may be developed with a building and improvements that are not heavily used (such as large parking lots that typically have few parked cars). 2) Project Type:
a) Residential or mixed-use development that includes a minimum of 10 residential units; or b) Destination- or pedestrian-oriented commercial development. Such uses activate the community and encourage patrons to stay and enjoy other locations within the immediate area. Excluded uses include fuel stations and drive-thru restaurants. 3) Compliance with specific plan:
a) Project shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable specific plan and meet the design guideline criteria identified within the plan area; and b) Project shall include principally permitted use types. 4) Project Goals: projects shall also meet one of the following goals:
a) Enhance economic vitality and encourage reinvestment i) Job Creation/Retention: Projects shall create or retain at least 5 FTE jobs paid at least 100% of the current County annual average wage. (see U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for annual wage); or
ii) Sales Tax: The project is anticipated to generate at least $1 million in annual taxable sales; or
iii) Commercial Reinvestment and Redevelopment: Projects shall update, repair, improve, and redevelop existing buildings and underutilized sites. Projects shall improve a minimum of 25% of the property, which can include structures and site improvements; or
iv) Significant reinvestment: Projects that are highly visible, include over 20,000 square feet of commercial, 50 residential units, 50 new jobs, and/or are over an acre of size are considered to be significant and will be given priority. b) Promote mixed-use development and housing:
i) Mixed-Use Development: Projects that incorporate a mix of commercial and residential uses to create vibrant, walkable environments will be prioritized. Mixed use developments shall provide a density of a minimum of 25 housing units per acre and provide adequate square footage to support commercial uses that are neighborhood serving; or
ii) Housing Opportunities: Projects should provide diverse housing options including multifamily and affordable housing development consistent with the specific plan, at densities of a minimum of 25 housing units per acre. Projects that provide a minimum of 20% of the units as affordable shall be prioritized.
Eligible impact fee reduction:
Projects meeting the eligibility criteria listed above may be eligible for a reduction (e.g. credit) in certain city-controlled development impact fees. Applicants must demonstrate at least 25% private investment of the total project cost. The total amount of fee credits can not exceed 2% of the calculated overall project cost. Additionally, project credits cannot exceed $500,000. Credits will also be limited to the city’s fund balance for fee credits and cannot be combined with the Facade Rebate program.
City-controlled impact fees eligible for a credit may include, and but are not limited to:
• Fire Service Construction Tax
• Public Facilities Fee
• Local Sewer Connection Fee
• Sewer Special Benefit Area
• Water Connection Fees Domestic
• Water Connection Fees Irrigation
• Water Pressure Zone
• Traffic Mitigation Fee
• Solid Waste Fee
• Electric Backbone Fee
• Air Quality Program Fees
Eligible fees and credit amount will be determined through the application review process.
Development impact fee credit process:
Following approval of the planning entitlement, and at building permit application acceptance, submit a request for a Commercial Corridors development fee impact credit application.
Applications will be reviewed concurrently with the building permit application. Projects approved for a fee credit will receive a fee estimate showing the approved fee credits. Approved fee credits will automatically be generated as part of the building permit invoicing.
RESOLUTION NO. 25-334
APPROVING THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS FAÇADE AND FRONTAGE
IMPROVEMENT REBATE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, in December 2022, the Roseville City Council approved three new specific plans, the Douglas-Harding, Douglas-Sunrise, and Atlantic Street Specific Plans, also known as the Commercial Corridors Specific Plans; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this specific plan effort was to facilitate commercial reinvestment and redevelopment, housing, and streetscape beautification in the City’s aging commercial corridors; and
WHEREAS, the preparation of the specific plans was funded by a Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) grant and the General fund; and
WHEREAS, following adoption of the specific plans, approximately $1.01M remained in the Commercial Corridors specific plan accounts; and
WHEREAS, following approval of the specific plans, staff looked to identify feasible uses of the remaining funds and evaluate factors impacting reinvestment in the Commercial Corridors specific plan areas; and
WHEREAS, staff utilized a portion of the remaining grant funds to prepare conceptual plans and renderings showing the development potential of various opportunity sites within the plan areas and funded the preparation of two targeted studies focused on the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise corridors as these areas provide the most opportunity; and WHEREAS, both studies found that the cost of development is the biggest factor impacting redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, based on the recommendations from the two studies, staff is recommending two new programs to help offset the costs of redevelopment in these targeted areas; and WHEREAS, the Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate Program is to help offset fees associated with improvements to building facades and property frontages that is intended to incentivize individual tenants or commercial properties committed to enhancing aging properties or streetscapes; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the implementation of the Commercial Corridors Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate Program is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate the implementation of the Program.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
DRAFT Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate Program
Purpose: The Commercial Corridors Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate program is intended to incentivize individual tenants or commercial properties committed to enhancing aging properties or streetscapes.
Project Area: The project area includes Community Commercial (CC) zoned sites within the Douglas-Harding or Douglas-Sunrise specific plans.
Eligible Projects: To qualify for consideration, project shall include upgrades to the exterior façade of an existing building and/or upgrades to existing landscaping along the property frontage to add value to the location. The Façade and Frontage Improvement Rebate program provides a minimum of $1,000 and a maximum of $20,000 rebate per project, with a maximum of up to $1,000.00 to go towards the cost of City of Roseville permit fees.
Eligible projects can receive a rebate for the following materials including, but not limited to signs, awnings, windows/doors, paint, lighting, stucco, siding, tile, and landscaping materials (e.g. fencing, planters, trees, bushes, pavers, etc.).
Items not eligible for a rebate include, but are not limited to construction, labor, or installation costs, design work, already completed projects, interior tenant improvement projects, business related equipment and supplies, and residential properties.
Rebates will also be limited to the city’s fund balance for rebate program.
Application Review and Rebate Issuance: Applications will be reviewed concurrently with the required building permit application (in cases where a building permit is not required, applications will be reviewed with the Planning entitlement). All applications will be reviewed by the city to ensure the project complies with the applicable specific plan design guidelines. Projects will be selected based on those anticipated to provide the greatest public benefit to the Commercial Corridors. Receipts are required for all rebate requests.
Rebates will be issued after project completion/final inspection and following the review of the project receipts. Additionally, rebates will be limited to the city’s fund balance for the rebate program.
Executive Summary: Commercial Corridors Retail Market Analysis Prepared for:
City of Roseville, CA
Economic Development Department
℅ Gina McColl
Economic Development Analyst II
Prepared by:
The Retail Coach, LLC
Charles Parker
Project Director
Selected by the City of Roseville, The Retail Coach executed a Retail Market Analysis of the areas designated by the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise Specific Plans. Below is an Executive Summary of Findings and Recommendations that can be found in the Commercial Corridors Retail Market Study. In addition to the Study Report, all data reports and source files referenced in the Study have also been submitted.
Key Findings
While the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise Corridors are anchored by national tenants - as well as being adjacent to additional strong retail destinations - the area is showing signs of age and certain properties are not currently meeting their highest and best use. As the long-time “front door” to Roseville, these corridors are well established and built out, leaving little opportunity for new development. Thus, efforts should be focused on improving existing shopping centers and redevelopment of other properties to present new opportunities to attract additional retailers and restaurants to the area.
1. Real Estate Metrics Competitive in Greater Market
When compared to other retail districts in the immediate area, the two Douglas Commercial Corridors may seem to be in poor condition. However, they are right in line with the greater Sacramento Retail Market as a whole. Vacancy Rates, Market Asking Prices, and Cap Rates are all very similar to the overall market - even if they are slightly different than the Roseville/Rocklin submarket.
2. Properties in Need of Updating / Redevelopment
With the exception of the TJMaxx Plaza, the shopping centers and other commercial properties in the Commercial Corridors are visibly dated and have lacked owner investment. The lack of upkeep is a possible explanation for the wide range in tenant mix, from high end grocery stores and retail to discount merchandisers, independent businesses, and thrift stores.
3. Leakage Shows Need for Food Service and Drinking Places Despite an overall retail surplus within a 5 mile radius, several subcategories of Food and Drinking Places are experiencing leakage. This suggests that there is opportunity Commercial Corridors Retail Market Analysis | Roseville, CA The Retail Coach | 1
for new restaurants of all categories to be recruited to Roseville. Compared to other sectors in the trade area, there appears to be a lack of dining options. Other categories with large surplus indicate the overall strength of the Roseville retail market and its ability to draw consumers from well beyond the immediate area.
4. The Commercial Corridors are a Regional Draw
In addition to leakage numbers, mobile location data highlights the regional draw of the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise Corridors. Two-thirds of the unique visitors to Trader Joes in Roseville Square come from 5+ miles away. Nearly half of the visitors to the Hobby Lobby come from 5+ miles away. Mobile location mapping of existing locations in the Commercial Corridors indicate an actual Retail Trade Area of over 550,000 people.
5. Strong Consumer Segments in the Primary Trade Area
A review of ESRI Tapestry Data reveals characteristics in the local consumer population that are desirable to retailers and restaurants. The biggest segment (Boomburbs) is part of the most affluent groups and is made up of young professionals and their families that are trading-up to distinguished neighborhoods. This group, along with Home Improvement and Bright Young Professionals (the precursor to Boomburbs), spend above average on retail and restaurant categories and can be used as an attraction point for new commercial development.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Douglas Boulevard is a well established corridor and main east-west artery through the City.
This provides good visibility and traffic counts, which led to the site selection of strong national retailers such as Trader Joes, The Home Depot, Ross, and Hobby Lobby. Additionally, the access to residential neighborhoods with elevated income levels creates a very desirable destination for brands. Despite not being within the Specific Plan, the Walmart and Target shopping centers - also looking to take advantage of the demographics - help with attracting new investment to the Douglas-Harding and Douglas-Sunrise Corridors.
Weaknesses
The overall age of the main shopping centers and retail spaces - and lack of aesthetic upkeep - is the main weakness of the area. Due to historic high-tier tenanting and demographic profile, it was likely that property owners did not need to invest much in their properties to attract new tenants. As time went on and shopping centers were parceled off and sold, an environment of disjointed ownership has been created. This will make it harder for improvements at scale and requires a higher level of collaboration and “buy-in” due to multiple owners. Additionally, these areas are essentially built out, leaving only space for redevelopment - something not all developers or tenants are interested in.
Commercial Corridors Retail Market Analysis | Roseville, CA The Retail Coach | 2
Opportunities
During times of inflated construction costs and high interest rates, second- and third-generation shopping centers become more attractive. They are generally located on strong retail sites and present an alternative to ground up construction. These points all hold true for the shopping centers in the Douglas Corridors. Additionally, there are a collection of similar use properties (i.e., auto/repair) along the frontage of Douglas that are prime candidates for redevelopment. Combined with the potential residential sites identified in the recent housing study, these properties present new opportunities to bring in modern mixed-use projects that would create the type of retail space that does not currently exist in this area.
Threats
The biggest threat to the Douglas-Sunrise and Douglas-Harding Corridors is the continued success of the Galleria area and the Roseville Bypass Corridor. Douglas Boulevard is less than three miles from the Galleria and adjacent retail centers, excluding most brands from having a location in both retail nodes. Having the competitive edge on many fronts (age, co-tenants, expansion potential. etc…) the Galleria is the alternative to the Douglas Corridors that must be overcome to attract new investment. This threat is heightened by the unknown future of some of the current anchors along Douglas Boulevard. Lastly, inaccurate perceptions held by developers on issues such as drive-thru requirements places these Corridors at risk for being passed over for new projects.
Recruitment Recommendations
1. Streamline Communication
Creating a designated main point of contact(s) for retail and restaurant discussions can play a role in streamlining communications and building solid relationships with site selectors. This provides confidence for those looking to do projects in the city by knowing they have someone they can call who assists them, and do not have to call through the city’s directory to get passed along. This person needs to be active at ICSC and other industry events to further strengthen those relationships and promote the City as business friendly.
2. Maintain Property Inventory List + Online Retail Data Up-to-date and ready-to-share retail and property data is essential to the site selection process. Having retail trade area data and demographics posted so site selectors can easily find it can help encourage projects in your community. Additionally, listing available retail properties across the City can be a tool to encourage more collaboration with local brokers by promoting their listings.
Commercial Corridors Retail Market Analysis | Roseville, CA The Retail Coach | 3
3. Engage + Educate Commercial Real Estate Professionals It is extremely difficult for site selectors and developers to remain up-to-date on any changes to the planning/zoning process to various projects throughout the City that impact housing, retail, and commercial development. By being proactive to educate stakeholders through newsletters, regular webinars, or other informational meetings can help the development process progress more smoothly. Marketing collateral, such as diagrams and explanations of the drive-thru requirements in the Commercial Corridors, can ensure that developers have a proper understanding of what is allowed and eliminate misconceptions that could make Roseville miss out on new projects.
As part of the Retail Market Analysis, The Retail Coach included a list of potential prospects for recruitment to the Commercial Corridors. These brands were selected based upon trade area data, existing store locations, available real estate, co-tenancy, and expansion plans. Tenants included on the list represent traditional retail, restaurants (full-service and fast-casual), fitness, and grocery.
A core belief of The Retail Coach is that retail must be recruited. In our experience, communities that play an active role in the recruitment of retail and developers oftentimes have the most success in attracting new brands to their community. As part of the scope of the project, The Retail Coach will continue to be available to City Staff to assist with retail and restaurant recruitment efforts by providing guidance on marketing material and other collateral to attract new investment.
Commercial Corridors Retail Market Analysis | Roseville, CA The Retail Coach | 4
July 2024
Commercial Corridors
Retail Market Study
Douglas-Harding | Douglas-Sunrise
Corridor Overview
• Retail + commercial corridor anchored
by Roseville Square (Trader Joes,
Grocery Outlet, Rite Aid, Starbucks…),
Harding Plaza, and a mixture of single
tenant commercial, fitness, and
professional services
• Businesses include several national
brands, but also has a strong collection
of independent businesses and
restaurants
• Multiple budget and extended stay
hotels, likely not achieving the highest
and best use potential of the
properties
Douglas-Harding
Corridor Overview
3
Douglas-Sunrise
Corridor Overview
4 • Anchored by several national big-box
shopping centers highlighted by TJ
Maxx, Hobby Lobby, Ross, and Office
Depot
• Flanked by more premier shopping
centers anchored by Walmart and
Target
• Development along the frontage of
Douglas from TJ Maxx Plaza to the
freeway inconsistent rest of corridor
• Major travel corridor for adjacent auto
mall, as well as key residential areas
around Folsom Lake to the east
Retail Real Estate Metrics
Corridor Overview
5 Douglas-Harding
Corridor
Douglas-Sunrise
Corridor
Roseville/Rocklin
Submarket
Sacramento
Market
Inventory
(SF) 542 K 830 K 15.9 M 113 M
Under
Construction (SF) - - 13 K 292 K
Vacancy Rate (%) 5.9% 6.1% 4.7% 6.1%
Market Asking
Price (Rent/SF) $21.73 $23.65 $26.86 $23.25
Market Asking
Price (Sale/SF) $243 $261 $273 $248
Market Cap
Rate (%) 6.3% 6.0% 6.3% 6.4%
Source: CoStar, July 2024
The two Douglas corridors of study might seem to be in poor condition in comparison to other areas of Roseville/Rocklin, but overall they both appear to compete well against the Sacramento Market as a whole. Asking prices are certainly lower than those the immediate area, and vacancy is higher than other parts to Roseville/Rocklin. However, both corridors are similar or better than the overall regional market.
Drive Time Demographics
Corridor Overview
Source: Claritas, 2024 6
5 min 10 min 15 min
Est.
Population 18,014 87,384 170,973
Avg. HH
Income $48,112 $81,539 $85,538
Med. HH
Income $36,206 $58,980 $61,501
Med. Age 20.3 29.0 32.5
Growth
Projection 1.0% 0.8% 0.5%
5-mile Radial Demographics
Corridor Overview
Source: Claritas, 2024 7
5 mile
Est.
Population 294,532
Avg. HH Income $134,073
Med. HH Income $98,931
Med. Age 40.1
Growth
Projection 3.1%
5-mile Radial Leakage
Corridor Overview
8 NAICS
Code Description Potential Sales Actual Sales Leakage Index Total Retail + Restaurant $7,276,627,000 $7,598,243,000 -$321,616,000 1.04 441 - - - Motor Vehicles + Parts $1,419,017,000 $2,324,265,000 -$905,248,000 1.64 442 - - - Furniture + Home Furnishings $113,380,000 $228,319,000 -$114,939,000 2.01 443 - - - Electronics + Appliances $107,326,000 $169,761,000 -$62,435,000 1.58 444 - - - Building Materials + Gardening Equipment $343,249,000 $414,423,000 -$71,174,000 1.21 445 - - - Food + Beverage Stores $957,128,000 $966,366,000 -$9,238,000 1.01 4452 - - Specialty Food Stores $25,434,000 $22,827,000 $2,607,000 0.90 446 - - - Health + Personal Care Stores $351,114,000 $342,760,000 $8,354,000 0.98 448 - - - Clothing + Accessories Stores $359,187,000 $425,722,000 -$66,535,000 1.19 44811 Men’s Clothing Stores $7,739,000 $6,222,000 $1,517,000 0.20 451 - - - Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical, Book Stores $84,405,000 $129,262,000 -$44,857,000 1.53 452 - - - General Merchandise Stores $674,630,000 $854,395,000 -$179,765,000 1.27 Source: Claritas, 2024
5-mile Radial Leakage
Corridor Overview
9 NAICS
Code Description Potential Sales Actual Sales Leakage Index Total Retail + Restaurant $7,276,627,000 $7,598,243,000 -$321,616,000 1.04 722 - - - Food Service + Drinking Places $968,711,000 $842,294,000 $126,417,000 0.87 7223 - - Special Food Services $67,587,000 $34,715,000 $32,872,000 0.51 722511 Full-Service Restaurants $421,218,000 $404,347,000 $16,871,000 0.96 722513 Limited-Service Restaurants $361,462,000 $301,134,000 $60,328,000 0.83 722514 Cafeterias + Grill Buffets $7,742,000 $4,446,000 $3,296,000 0.57 Despite an overall retail surplus within a 5 mile radius, several subcategories of Food + Drinking Places are experiencing leakage. This suggests that there is opportunity for new restaurants of all categories to be recruited to Roseville. Compared to other sectors, there appears to be a lack of dining options.
Other categories with strong surplus indicate the overall strength of the Roseville retail market and its ability to draw consumers that live well beyond the immediate area.
Source: Claritas, 2024
Mobile Location Data
Roseville Square
Mobile Location Data
11 Baseline Comparisons
• Roseville Square has a foot traffic of
169,100 people per month. The median
monthly foot traffic for stand-alone
venues of Trader Joe's is 19,600. The
median foot traffic for stand-alone
venues within the Supermarkets and
Other Grocery Stores industry is 16,500
visitors per month.
Average Monthly Visitation
• Visitation to this shopping center has
historically been between 157,700 and
204,400 people per month
• The people that most often visits this
venue are 18 to 29 years old and have
an income of $125k and above
• Although they account for
a much larger proportion
of total visits, only 33% of
unique visitors to
Roseville Square live within
5 miles of the shopping
center. The map indicates
this locations serves
consumers from across
Placer, Sacramento, and El
Dorado Counties.
Mobile Location Data
12 Roseville Square