Roseville City Council
January 21, 2026

14 dramatic, comedic or musical performances, the showing of motion pictures or similar recorded media, or other live performing arts.

T. 1. Uniform Building Code: The Uniform Building Code currently in use and adopted by the City of Roseville.

2. Usable Open Space: One or more open areas adjacent to residential uses, the purpose of which is to provide an outdoor area designed for outdoor living and recreation, and which is located at, below, or above grade. This space is typically accommodated within side and rear yard areas. The area covered by accessory structures meeting the standards for unenclosed structures (see Section 19.22.030) may be counted towards usable open space.

3. Use: The purpose of which land or a building is arranged, designed, or intended, or for which either land or a building is or may be occupied or maintained.

4. Use, Accessory: See Accessory Uses, Article III, Chapter 19.22.

5. Use, Conditionally Permitted: A use type subject to a Conditional Use Permit, which use may be essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare in one or more zones but which may also impair the integrity and character of the zone or adjoining zone or be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare unless additional restrictions on location and extent of use are imposed and enforced. Such use shall be permitted when all specific additional restrictions are completed and permanently satisfied in conformance with an approved Conditional Use Permit. Should such restrictions be of a continuing nature, the use will remain conditional so long as the restrictions are complied with, but shall become an illegal use whenever and so long as the restrictions are not complied with.

6. Use, Primary: The primary use or uses for which land or a building is or may be intended, occupied, maintained, arranged or designed and includes principally, conditionally and administratively permitted uses.

7. Use, Principally Permitted: The primary use of land or of a main building which use is compatible with the purpose of the zone and which is permitted in the zone. If a use is listed in a specific zone as a principally permitted use, it means that the owner, lessee or other person who has legal right to use the land, has right to conduct such principally permitted use subject to the regulations and procedural requirements of this title.

8. Use, Temporary: See Temporary Uses, Article IV, Chapter 19.64.

9. Use Type: A category or class of land uses which share common functional, product or compatibility characteristics and which have been classified under a discreet use type in these regulations, commencing at Article II of this title.

U. Reserved.

15 V. Reserved.

W. Reserved.

X. Reserved.

Y. 1. Zoning District: A designated/mapped portion of the City within which a uniform set of regulations apply.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 1/21/2026
Item #: VII.23
File #: 0102-10
Item ID: 2025-989
Title: Resolution - Rachel Tooker
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Commend Rachel Tooker for her 12 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and the Environmental Utilities Department, congratulate her for her accomplishments and lasting contributions to the organization and the community, and wish her a long, healthy, and well-deserved retirement.

RECOMMENDATION
Commend Rachel Tooker for her 12 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and the Environmental Utilities Department, congratulate her for her accomplishments and lasting contributions to the organization and the community, and wish her a long, healthy, and well-deserved retirement.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Council approval of a resolution meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Rachel Tooker

REVIEWERS:

Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 12/23/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 1/6/2026

Communication
Meeting Date: 1/21/2026
Item #: VII.24
File #: 0600-01
Item ID: 2025-978
Title: Staffing Changes and Side Letter Agreement with Roseville Police Association Contact: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected]

SUMMARY
As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing levels to provide a high level of service to the community, staff recommends City Council approve the Seasonal/Temporary salary schedule reflecting an update to the Soccer Official pay structure. In addition, staff recommends that the City Council approve the side letter agreement between the City of Roseville and the Roseville Police Association related to classifications eligible for certification/training special pay. For the remainder of FY2025-26, the estimated financial impact of these recommendations is $12,200 to the General Fund. Beyond this fiscal year, the recommended changes will have an estimated annual ongoing impact of $17,700.

RECOMMENDATION
As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing structure to provide a high level of service to the community, staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Adopt an ordinance to approve the attached Seasonal/Temporary Salary Schedule (Appendix A) reflecting the update to the Soccer Official classification (7005), effective January 24, 2026; and

2. Adopt a resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute the attached side letter agreement between the City of Roseville and the Roseville Police Association related to Certifications Eligible for Special Pay.

BACKGROUND
As part of the Municipal Code, the Human Resources Department maintains the City’s classification plan.

Human Resources staff continually evaluates organizational structure and staffing levels necessary to provide high service levels to the community. The proposed recommendations are as follows:

Parks, Recreation, and Libraries (PR&L)
Staff recommends updating the temporary Soccer Official pay structure. With the opening of the Placer Valley Soccer Complex, PR&L has expanded soccer league offerings to better meet community demand.

These leagues vary in game length and level of complexity, which warrants a differentiated pay structure.

The proposed update would compensate temporary Soccer Officials $40 per Arena soccer game, $55 per 7v7 soccer game, and $80 per 11v11 soccer game.

Roseville Police Association Side Letter
The Roseville Police Association (RPA) and the City staff have met and conferred regarding the Special Pay section of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to training and certification for the recently established classifications of Crime Analysis Supervisor, Real Time Crime Center Specialist, and

Police Systems Security and Compliance Technician. The attached side letter agreement provides that employees in these new classifications may submit the required training records for the special pay to be effective January 10, 2026. Additionally, based on a recent CalPERS inquiry, it was determined that a provision in the RPA MOU, Chapter 2, Article III, Special Pays section, requires an update to continue the special pay reporting that has occurred for several decades. The attached side letter agreement removes the requirement to complete a one (1) year probationary period prior to being eligible for the special certification pay to meet the CalPERS requirement and continue the long-standing special compensation reporting practice. The City and RPA do not want retirees or current employees to be harmed. Upon execution of the side letter agreement, eligible probationary employees in classifications other than the three listed above may submit required certification records in accordance with the MOU.

FISCAL IMPACT
Parks, Recreation, and Libraries
The requested update to the temporary Soccer Official pay structure does not result in any additional General Fund costs as the new classification game rate will be funded within the PR&L approved FY2025- 26 temporary salaries budget, covered by program revenues.

RPA Side Letter Agreement
The estimated total cost to the General Fund of the recommended RPA Special Pay is estimated to be $12,200 for the remainder of FY2025-26, all of which can be absorbed by existing appropriations. Beyond this fiscal year, the recommended changes have an estimated annual ongoing impact of $17,700 to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed salary schedule update and side letter agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Macy Dippert, Human Resources Manager
Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7033

2. 2026.01.24 Temporary Salary Schedule

3. Resolution 26-017

4. Side Letter Agreement with RPA - Certification Eligible for Special Pays - Signed by RPA REVIEWERS:

Tamiko Thomas, Human Resources Department Created/Initiated - 1/8/2026 Macy Dippert, Human Resources Department Approved - 1/13/2026 Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Department Approved - 1/13/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/14/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/14/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/14/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/14/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/14/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/14/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 1/14/2026

ORDINANCE NO. 7033

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 7025, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR SEASONAL/TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “A” TO BE EFFECTIVE
JANUARY 24, 2026, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Title and Purpose.

Ordinance No. 7025, the Salary Ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, is hereby amended as shown on Appendix “A” attached hereto reflecting minimum wage adjustments and the addition of classifications.

AMENDMENT OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Pay Rate
7005 Soccer Official $40.00 Per Arena Game
$55.00 Per 7v7 Game
$80.00 Per 11v11 Game
SECTION 2. Salary Plan Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall be effective January 24, 2026, as an urgency measure.

SECTION 3. Urgency Ordinance.

This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect January 24, 2026. A statement of urgency is as follows:

It is necessary to amend the Salary Ordinance to comply with recently approved changes for the orderly and necessary continuance of operations of the City.

SECTION 4. Posting.

The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _________________, 20___, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_____________________________
ATTEST: MAYOR
_________________________
City Clerk

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
CI30 Activity Instructor Step A 0.0000
1158 Adult/Senior Services Driver Step A 22.5000
3747 Aqua Fitness Instructor Step A 51.0000
1100 Aquatics Facilities Maintenance
Worker
Step A 19.5000
Step B 20.5000
Step C 21.5000
Step D 22.5000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9503 Assistant Pool Manager I Step A 20.8373
1077 Assistant Pool Manager II Step A 21.8791

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9505 Building Inspection Assistant Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.3173
Step C 17.7450
Step D 18.1832
Step E 18.6323
Step F 19.0924
Step G 19.5639
Step H 20.0470
Step I 20.5421
9507 Child Care Aide Step A 17.0000
Step B 17.4198
Step C 17.8500
Step D 18.2908

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9506 Child Care Program Assistant Step A 20.5014
Step B 21.0077
Step C 21.5265
Step D 22.0581
1010 Child Care Program Leader Step A 24.6017
Step B 25.2092
Step C 25.8318
Step D 26.4697

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9508 Child Care Teacher Step A 17.8500
Step B 18.2908
Step C 18.7425
Step D 19.2053
CI10 Class Instructor Step A 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1230 College Intern Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.7450
Step C 18.6323
Step D 19.5639
Step E 20.5421
Step F 21.5692
Step G 22.6476
Step H 23.7800
Step I 24.9690
Step J 26.2174
Step K 27.5283
Step L 28.9047
Step M 30.3500
Step N 31.8675
Step O 33.4608

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1127 Community Outreach Specialist Step A 33.8978
Step B 34.7349
Step C 35.5926
Step D 36.4716
Step E 37.3723
Step F 38.2952
Step G 39.2409
Step H 40.2100
Step I 41.2029
1270 Council Member Step A
1164 Courier Step A 21.2880
Step B 21.9266
Step C 22.5843
Step D 23.2619
600.0000 monthly stipend*
*Mayor receives an additional $50.00 per month

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1137 Customer Service Specialist Step A 18.0000
Step B 18.5400
Step C 19.0962
Step D 19.6691
Step E 20.2592
Step F 20.8669
Step G 21.4929
Step H 22.1377
Step I 22.8019
9509 Engineering Aide Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.3173
Step C 17.7450
Step D 18.1832
Step E 18.6323
Step F 19.0924
Step G 19.5639
Step H 20.0470
Step I 20.5421

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1020 Event Recreation Program Leader Step A 23.0000
1159 Event Specialist Step A 21.5000
9510 Fire Equipment Specialist Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.7450
Step C 18.6323
Step D 19.5639
Step E 20.5421
Step F 21.5692
Step G 22.6476
Step H 23.7800
Step I 24.9690
Step J 26.2174
Step K 27.5283
Step L 28.9047
Step M 30.3500
Step N 31.8675
Step O 33.4608

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9511 Fire Logistics Worker Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.7450
Step C 18.6323
Step D 19.5639
Step E 20.5421
Step F 21.5692
Step G 22.6476
Step H 23.7800
Step I 24.9690
Step J 26.2174
Step K 27.5283
Step L 28.9047
Step M 30.3500
Step N 31.8675
Step O 33.4608

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9512 Fire Public Education Coordinator Step A 20.5700
Step B 21.3636
Step C 21.8977
Step D 22.4452
Step E 23.0063
Step F 23.5815
Step G 24.1710
Step H 24.7753
Step I 25.3946
Step J 26.0295
Step K 26.6802
Step L 27.3473
Step M 28.0309
Step N 28.7317
Step O 29.4500
CI20 Fitness Instructor-Fee Step A 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
3735 Fitness Instructor-Hourly Step A 30.0000
Step B 31.0000
Step C 32.0000
Step D 33.0000
Step E 34.0000
Step F 35.0000
1145 High School Intern Step A 18.0000
1079 Instructor Hourly Step A 23.0000
Step B 24.0000
Step C 25.0000
Step D 26.0000
Step E 27.0000
Step F 28.0000
Step G 29.0000
Step H 30.0000
Step I 31.0000
3750 Instructor Meeting Rate Step A 19.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9513 Interpretive Services Program
Assistant
Step A 17.5000
Step B 18.5000
Step C 19.5000
Step D 20.5000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
9514 Interpretive Services Program Leader Step A 20.0000 Step B 21.0000
Step C 22.0000
Step D 23.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9515 Library Page I Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.5000
Step C 18.5000
Step D 19.5000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1184 Library Page II Step A 17.5000
Step B 18.5000
Step C 19.5000
Step D 20.5000
1185 Library Program Leader Step A 20.0000
Step B 21.0000
Step C 22.0000
Step D 23.0000
1074 Lifeguard Step A 18.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9518 Maintenance Assistant Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.7450
Step C 18.6323
Step D 19.5639
Step E 20.5421
Step F 21.5692
Step G 22.6476
Step H 23.7800
Step I 24.9690
Step J 26.2174
Step K 27.5283
Step L 28.9047
Step M 30.3500
Step N 31.8675
Step O 33.4608

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9519 Marketing Technician Step A 20.8116
Step B 21.3255
Step C 21.8522
Step D 22.3918
Step E 22.9448
Step F 23.5114
Step G 24.0920
Step H 24.6870
Step I 25.2966
Step J 25.9213
Step K 26.5615
Step L 27.2174
Step M 27.8895
Step N 28.5783
Step O 29.2840

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9521 Parks and Facility Maintenance
Worker
Step A 19.5000
Step B 20.5000
Step C 21.5000
Step D 22.5000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1011 Parks and Facility Maintenance
Worker-Commercial Driver
Step A 21.0000
Step B 22.0000
Step C 23.0000
Step D 24.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9523 Parks and Open Space Equipment
Operator
Step A 27.0000
Step B 28.0000
Step C 29.0000
Step D 30.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1012 Parks and Open Space Equipment
Operator-Commerical Driver
Step A 29.0000
Step B 30.0000
Step C 31.0000
Step D 32.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
3749 Personal Trainer I Step A 37.0000
1070 Personal Trainer II Step A 40.0000
1071 Personal Trainer III Step A 45.0000
1072 Personal Trainer IV Step A 50.0000
9525 Police Cadet Step A 23.4058
Step B 24.5062
Step C 25.2414
Step D 25.9986
Step E 26.7787
Step F 27.5820
Step G 28.4094
Step H 29.2617
Step I 30.1396
Step J 31.0438
Step K 31.9751
Step L 32.9343

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9527 Pool Manager I Step A 22.9731
Step B 0.0000
Step C 0.0000
Step D 0.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1078 Pool Manager II Step A 24.1217

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9528 Preschool Teacher Step A 21.5265
Step B 22.0581
Step C 22.6028
Step D 23.1610
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
6110 Recreation Aide Step A 14.3650
Step B 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9532 Recreation Program Leader Step A 20.0000
Step B 21.0000
Step C 22.0000
Step D 23.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
9533 Recreation Specialist I Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.5000
Step C 18.5000
Step D 19.5000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9534 Recreation Specialist II Step A 17.5000
Step B 18.5000
Step C 19.5000
Step D 20.5000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
9535 Recreation Specialist III Step A 18.5000
Step B 19.5000
Step C 20.5000
Step D 21.5000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1157 Refuse Maintenance Assistant Step A 23.6173
Step B 24.2005
Step C 24.7982
Step D 25.4106
Step E 26.0381
Step F 26.6811
Step G 27.3400
Step H 28.0151
Step I 28.7070
6252 Reserve Police Officer I Step A 47.4060
Step B 48.8685
Step C 50.3762
Step D 51.9301
Step E 53.5326
Step F 55.1840
Step G 56.8863
Step H 58.6414
Step I 60.4506

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
6250 Reserve Police Officer II (Unpaid) Step A 0.0000
6248 Reserve Police Officer III (Unpaid) Step A 0.0000
9536 School Crossing Guard Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.3173
Step C 17.7450
Step D 18.1832
Step E 18.6323
Step F 19.0924
Step G 19.5639
Step H 20.0470
Step I 20.5421

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9538 Senior Child Care Teacher Step A 18.7425
Step B 19.2053
Step C 19.6796
Step D 20.1656
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1075 Senior Lifeguard I Step A 18.9000
1076 Senior Lifeguard II Step A 19.8450

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9537 Senior School Crossing Guard Step A 18.1500
Step B 18.5982
Step C 19.0575
Step D 19.5281
Step E 20.0104
Step F 20.5045
Step G 21.0109
Step H 21.5298
Step I 22.0614
7005 Soccer Official Step A 40.0000 Per Arena Game

55.0000 Per 7v7 Game

80.0000 Per 11v11 Game
7207 Sports Official/Scorer I Step A 18.5000
7208 Sports Official/Scorer II Step A 20.5000
9552 Swim Instructor Aide Step A 18.0000
9553 Swim Instructor I Step A 19.0000
9554 Swim Instructor II Step A 20.0000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1149 Therapeutic Recreation Program
Leader
Step A 26.0000
Step B 26.6421
Step C 27.3000
Step D 27.9742
Step E 28.6650
Step F 29.3729
Step G 30.0983
Step H 30.8416
Step I 31.6032
1165 Therapeutic Recreation Specialist Step A 21.5000

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9539 Video Technician Step A 22.5676
Step B 23.1250
Step C 23.6962
Step D 24.2815
Step E 24.8813
Step F 25.4958
Step G 26.1256
Step H 26.7709
Step I 27.4321

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
8941 Vocational Intern Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.7450
Step C 18.6323
Step D 19.5639
Step E 20.5421
Step F 21.5692
Step G 22.6476
Step H 23.7800
Step I 24.9690
Step J 26.2174
Step K 27.5283
Step L 28.9047
Step M 30.3500
Step N 31.8675
Step O 33.4608

TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:A
Effective Date:01/24/2026
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9540 Water Conservation Helper Step A 16.9000
Step B 17.3173
Step C 17.7450
Step D 18.1832
Step E 18.6323
Step F 19.0924
Step G 19.5639
Step H 20.0470
Step I 20.5421

RESOLUTION NO. 26-017

APPROVING A SIDE LETTER TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR

EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE ROSEVILLE POLICE ASSOCIATION, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a side letter to the Memorandum of Understanding for Employees Represented by the Roseville Police Association, related to classifications eligible for certification/training special pay, has been reviewed by the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Side Letter Agreement to the Master Memorandum of Understanding is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and administer, interpret, and apply its terms, intent, and spirit, and execute any other documents necessary to effectuate the purposes hereof as determined necessary by the City Manager.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Roseville this _______ day of __________________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCIL MEMBER:

NOES COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER:
___________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 1/21/2026
Item #: VII.25
File #: 0102-03
Item ID: 2026-25
Title: Minutes of Prior Meetings
Contact: Adilia Keller 916-774-5265 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the December 17, 2025 City Council Meeting.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes of the December 17, 2025 City Council Meeting.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Adilia Keller, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Minutes - December 17, 2025
REVIEWERS:

Christine Mesaros, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 1/13/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 1/14/2026

Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

MINUTES
City Council
Housing Authority/Housing Successor/
Finance Authority Meeting
December 17, 2025
6:00 PM
Roseville Electric Building, 116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bernasconi called the meeting to order at 6:02 PM.

II. ROLL CALL

Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller led the Pledge of Allegiance.

IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
City Clerk Carmen Avalos announced the procedures for addressing the City Council.

V. PRESENTATION

1. Gold Medal Finalist Plaque and Accreditation Award Presentation Summary: Jane Adams from the American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration to present Parks, Recreation, and Libraries with their Gold Medal Finalist Award.

CONTACT: Jill Geller 916-774-5249 [email protected] Jane Adams, Executive Director of the American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration, made the presentation to Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller, who responded.

VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

No public comment received.

VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to remove Item 35 from the Consent Calendar for presentation and approve the remaining items as recommended. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

2. Infrastructure Network and Server Equipment - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement and Budget Adjustment (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE

SOLUTIONS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with E.F.

Johnson Company in the amount of $113,500.67 to provide equipment and related services to upgrade the City radio system's network equipment. Sole source procurement is required as E.F.

Johnson Company is the only provider capable of upgrading the equipment to minimize impact on City operations while maintaining system support long-term. Staff also recommends approval of a $40,000 budget adjustment to fully fund the project, which includes higher-than-anticipated equipment costs, required City IT labor, and a small contingency to ensure successful completion. This project is funded through the City's standard citywide technology allocation methodology.

CONTACT: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-378 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and E.F. Johnson Company, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7019 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

3. Fire Department's Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade - Contract Purchase Agreement (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Silke Communications Solutions Inc. in the amount of $580,639.42 to provide equipment, services, maintenance and support for Fire's Very High Frequency Radio System. Initial funding is included in the Fire Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade Project budget and recurring support costs will be included in the Information Technology Operations Fund each fiscal year.

CONTACT: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-361 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville

and Silke Communications Solutions Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

4. Park and Park Facility Exclusions - Municipal Code Amendment (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code Section 8.02.316, “Park and park facility exclusions." City staff is proposing modifications to the existing park and park facility exclusion ordinance to provide clarity to staff and the public and increase operational efficiencies.

CONTACT: Joseph Speaker 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code Section 8.02.316, “Park and park facility exclusions”.

5. 2025 HOME Program Income Funding Application (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -

HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the HOME Program Income Notice of Funding Availability in the amount of $500,000 to support the Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program, and authorize execution of the application, standard agreement, and any related grant documents. This action will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Trisha Isom, Danielle OConnell 916-746-1239, 916-774-5277 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-368 authorizing the submission of the HOME investment partnerships program application to the California State Department of Housing and Community Development, and authorizing the Mayor to execute it and any related documents necessary to participate and comply with the program on behalf of the City of Roseville.

6. HOUSING AUTHORITY/CITY COUNCIL - Quarterly Status Update 3rd Quarter 2025 (ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, receive a status report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program for the Third Quarter of 2025. This report is for informational purposes only and has no impact on the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. This quarterly report is for informational purposes only.

7. HOUSING AUTHORITY — Administrative Plan Amendment (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a revised Roseville Housing Authority Administrative Plan as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Administrative Plan has no impact on the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-380 approving the updated Roseville Housing Authority Administrative Plan.

8. HOUSING SUCCESSOR/CITY COUNCIL - Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Report of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Report for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The Roseville Housing Successor Agency must produce a report of housing activities annually stating the fund balance and use of the funds. The Housing Successor Agency funds used for development of local affordable housing units and homeless prevention services reduces impacts on the General Fund.

CONTACT: Emily Sawin 916-774-5388 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-364 approving the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Report for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

9. Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Agreement Amendments (ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing agreement amendments with Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Latino Leadership Council, and Salvation Army. The amendments will increase the agreement grant amounts and support the City's goal to maintain a safe and healthy community. No General Fund resources will be used for these amendments.

CONTACT: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-382 approving a first amendment to Grant agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-383 approving a first amendment to Grant Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Latino Leadership Council Inc., and authorizing the City

Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and c. Adopt Resolution No. 25-384 approving a first amendment to Grant Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and the Salvation Army, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

10. Staffing Changes (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (IBEW) A & B salary schedules reflecting the addition of a Power Generation Safety Technician classification. Updates to the City allocation schedule reflect the addition of three (3) regular full-time positions: a Power Generation Safety Technician, a Deputy City Attorney I/II and an Assistant Engineer. For the remainder of FY2025-26, the financial impact of the recommendations to the Electric Fund and Water Operations Fund is $246,242.

Beyond the current fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $613,483 to the Electric, General and Water Operations Fund, including an estimated $121,000 to the General Fund.

CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7020 amending Odinance 6932, the salary ordinance for personnel represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, as amended by appendix “k” to be effective December 27, 2025 as an urgency measure; and b. Approve the attached city-wide allocation schedule effective December 27, 2025.

11. Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act Reports (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends acceptance of the informational reports prepared for the 2024-25 levy year to be filed with the City Clerk. Senate Bill 165 (SB 165) enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). The Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval include a statement identifying the specific purposes of the special tax, that the proceeds be used for those purposes, the establishment of a designated account for the deposit of proceeds, and the preparation of an annual report detailing the use of those funds. There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Accept informational reports prepared for the 2024-25 levy year to be filed with the City Clerk.

12. Fertilizer Plus Dimension (RFQ 10-3430) - Purchase Orders (FINANCE DEPARTMENT -

PURCHASING)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order to Nutrien Ag Solutions for the purchase of fertilizer plus Dimension in response to Request for Quotations No. 10-3430. The estimated cost for calendar year 2026 is $93,096. Estimated spending for the optional renewal calendar years are as follows: Calendar Year (CY) 2027 $98,000; CY 2028 $103,000; CY 2029 $108,000; CY2030 $113,000. Funding for these purchases is and will be included in the Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department’s Parks Division budget and in the Community Facilities Districts' budgets for each respective year. Staff requests authorization to continue utilizing the remaining four optional renewal years without further Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

CONTACT: Joanna Oukrop 916-746-1102 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-365 approving purchase orders for the purchase of fertilizer plus dimension.

13. Miscellaneous Waterworks Materials (RFQ-3376) - Purchase Order Increase (ENVIRONMENTAL

UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an increase of $205,000 to the estimated total combined value of the FY2025-26 purchase orders to Pace Supply Corporation and Ferguson Enterprises, LLC dba Ferguson Waterworks, as the lowest responsive and responsible bidders for the purchase of miscellaneous waterworks materials. The requested increase is due to an unexpected increase in the Environmental Utilities Water Utility requirements for parts supplied. This request will increase the estimated total award between the two suppliers for FY2025-26 to $1,250,000. Purchase orders will be issued as needed. Spending for FY2025-26 is included in department budgets in various City funds. Future spending is contingent upon Council approval of the City budget.

CONTACT: Robert Strebel 916-746-1717 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve an increase to the existing purchase order with Pace Supply Corporation and Ferguson Enterprises, LLC dba Ferguson Waterworks.

14. Water and Local Wastewater Capacity/Connection Fee Update and Nexus Study - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. for the Water and Local Wastewater Capacity/Connection Fee Update and Nexus Study in the amount of $11,895. The First Amendment will increase the total not-to exceed amount from $72,700 to $84,595 with available funding in the Water and Wastewater Operations Funds.

CONTACT: Linda York 916-774-5564 [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-367 approving first amendment to a professional service agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

15. Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Cost-of-Service/Rate Study - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a first amendment to the professional services agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. for the Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Cost-of-Service / Rate Study in the amount of $10,890. The first amendment will increase the total not-to exceed amount from $91,560 to $102,450 to cover additional recycled waterrelated services. Funding is available in the Wastewater Operations Fund.

CONTACT: Deanne Garcia 916-774-1780 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-369 approving a first amendment to professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

16. Environmental Utilities Strategic Plan Development - Professional Services Agreement (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $144,750 to provide strategic planning services for Waste Services and a comprehensive Environmental Utilities Strategic Plan. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities Department budget.

CONTACT: Kristina McKee 916-774-5595 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-381 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

17. Corridors Trunk Sewer Capacity Improvements Project – Professional Design Services Agreement (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WASTEWATER) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional design services agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC in the amount of $779,214 for design services and engineering services during construction of the Corridors Trunk Sewer Capacity Improvements Project. Funding for this agreement is provided by the South Placer Wastewater Authority, which is jointly funded by the City, Placer County and South Placer Municipal Utilities District.

CONTACT: Kyle Drury [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-377 approving a professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Water Works Engineers, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

18. Lower Bank Park Project - Notice of Completion (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES

DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Lower Bank Park Project. The total cost of the construction contract with Brightview Landscape Development, Inc. is $1,205,521.93. Funding for this project was included in the Creekview Neighborhood Park Fund.

CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-376 accepting the public work known as Lower Bank Park Project, approving the “Notice of Completion”, and authorizing the Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

19. Rocky Rockholm (FD-51) Park Project - Notice of Completion (PARKS, RECREATION, AND

LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Rocky Rockholm (FD51) Park Project. The total cost of the construction contract with Hemington Landscape Service, Inc. is $520,888.04. Funding for this project was included in the Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund.

CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-366 accepting the Public Work known as Rocky Rockholm (Fd-51) Park Project, approving the “Notice of Completion”, and authorizing the Parks, Recreation And Libraries Director to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

20. Professional Golf Services - Agreement Amendment (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES

DEPARTMENT - RECREATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a second amendment to the agreement with SRI Golf, Inc. to provide golf services at Woodcreek Golf Club and Diamond Oaks Golf Course. The financial impacts will be based on revenues generated under the contract’s structure, including a fixed annual fee and percentage-based revenues generated from golf rounds played, cart rentals, and driving range sales. Funding is in the Golf Course Funds, in which golf revenues offset expenses including maintenance, utilities and internal service fee expenses.

CONTACT: Rob Nakamura 916-774-5135 [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-373 approving a second amendment to agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and SRI Golf, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

21. Taser Equipment - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to a contract purchase agreement with Axon Enterprise, Inc. to increase the agreement total by $93,685.89, bringing the total agreement amount to $818,520.42 to provide tasers for the Police Department. Twenty additional taser handles will be purchased and assigned to the Department's Animal Control Officers, Reserve Officers, and Special Weapons and Tactical Team. The FY2025-26 total cost for the twenty additional taser handles is $31,728.81. Funding is included in the Police Department's General Fund budget.

CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-372 approving a contract purchase agreement amendment no. 1, by and between the City of Roseville and Axon Enterprise, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

22. Advanced Metering Infrastructure — Master Services Agreement Amendment (ELECTRIC

DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the fourth amendment to the master services agreement with Itron, Inc. for continued Advanced Metering Infrastructure Data Collection and Meter Data Management software, licensing, and maintenance. This amendment will increase the contract amount by $4,984,915.78 to ensure continued system support and pricing stability over the next five years. This contract will be funded by both the Electric Utility and Environmental Utilities and allocated annually in the Utility Business Systems budget.

CONTACT: Caitlin Ornelas 916-774-5178 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-370 approving a fourth amendment to master services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Itron, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

23. Settlement Software System Implementation and Support - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Yes Energy LLC dba Power Settlements Consulting and Software LLC, in the amount of $866,217, to provide implementation, license and support services for the CAISO Settlecore Software Settlement System (Settlecore), a modern settlement software platform that will replace

Roseville Electric’s existing system. The current software is outdated and no longer aligns with the City’s technology environment or business requirements. The Settlecore system is being procured as a sole source as it is the only solution already integrated with the existing Energy Imbalance Market settlements through the Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC).

Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget.

CONTACT: Steve Hancock 916-774-5631 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-387 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Yes Energy LLC dba Power Settlements Consulting and Software LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

24. 106 Ben Ezra Avenue - Parcel Map (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING

DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the 106 Ben Ezra Avenue parcel map. Engineering has completed its review of the parcel map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create two lots for future development. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Ed Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the parcel map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public easements offered thereon for dedication.

25. Sierra Vista KT-1A - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT -

ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for Sierra Vista KT-1A. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Ignacio Vizcarra 916-774-5578 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-362 accepting the public work known as Sierra Vista KT-1A Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting all dedications offered on the Recorded Map of the Subdivision.

26. Sierra Vista KT-1B - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT -

ENGINEERING DIVISION)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for Sierra Vista KT-1B. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Ignacio Vizcarra 916-774-5578 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-363 accepting the public work known as Sierra Vista KT-1B Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting all dedications offered on the Recorded Map of the Subdivision.

27. Creekview Phase 5 Villages 1 & 2 - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Creekview Phase 5 Villages 1 & 2 as complete. The Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-774-5441 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-386 accepting the public work known as Creekview Phase 5 Village 1 & 2 Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting a portion of the dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.

28. Creekview Phase 5 Villages 3 & 4 - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Creekview Phase 5 Villages 3 & 4 as complete. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-774-5441 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-385 accepting the public work known as Creekview Phase 5 Villages 3 & 4 Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City

Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting a portion of the dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.

29. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the November 19, 2025 Closed Session and the November 19, 2025 City Council Meeting.

CONTACT: Adilia Keller 916-774-5265 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the November 19, 2025 Closed Session and the November 19, 2025 City Council Meeting.

30. Resolution - Estela Roig
Summary: Commend Estela Roig for her 20 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and the Finance Department, congratulate her for her many accomplishments, and wish her a long, healthy, and fulfilling retirement.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

31. Second Reading - Massage Services – Municipal Code Amendment (CITY ATTORNEY

DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council approve an ordinance amending Chapter 9.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding massage services.

CONTACT: Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7017 amending Chapter 9.10 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code Regarding Massage Services.

32. Second Reading - Alarm Systems - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment (CITY ATTORNEY

DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a second reading of an ordinance amending Sections

10.64.030, 10.64.060, and 10.64.130 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding alarm systems and corresponding fines.

CONTACT: Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7018 amending Sections 10.64.030, 10.64.060, and 10.64.130 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding alarm systems.

33. Second Reading - Public Facilities Fee Update - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second reading of an ordinance approving adjustments to the Public Facilities Fee and amending Roseville Municipal Code Sections 4.52.010, 4.52.020, 4.52.040, 4.52.050, 4.52.060, 4.52.070, 4.52.080, 4.52.090, and

4.52.130 of Chapter 4.52 related to Public Facilities Fees.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7016 amending sections 4.52.010, 4.52.020, 4.52.040, 4.52.050,

4.52.060, 4.52.070, 4.52.080, 4.52.090, and 4.52.130 of Chapter 4.52 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Public Facilities Fees.

34. Appointment of Youth Board Member and Youth Commissioners (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends Council appoint Zach Unidad as the Grants Advisory Commission Youth Commissioner to a term ending December 31, 2026; and appoint Rochaelin Nguyen as the Library Board Youth Member to a term ending December 31, 2026; and appoint Olive Bailey as the Parks and Recreation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term ending December 31, 2026; and appoint Aishani Thakur as the Transportation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term ending December 31, 2026.

CONTACT: Katrina Six 916-774-5267 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Appoint Zach Unidad as the Grants Advisory Commission Youth Commissioner to a term expiring December 31, 2026.
b. Appoint Rochaelin Nguyen as the Library Board Youth Member to a term expiring December 31, 2026.
c. Appoint Olive Bailey as the Parks and Recreation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term expiring December 31, 2026.
d. Appoint Aishani Thakur as the Transportation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term expiring December 31, 2026.

35. Proclamation - Homeless Persons' Memorial Day December 21, 2025 Summary: Proclaim the 21st day of December 2025 as Homeless Persons' Memorial Day in the City of Roseville.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

Item removed from the Consent Calendar and Mayor Bernasconi made the presentation to Claudia Snyder of the Roseville Advocates for the Homeless, who responded.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VIII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS

36. Unscheduled Board and Commission Vacancies - Appointments (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends Council appoint one (1) individual to the Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee to a term expiring June 30, 2029, from the applications received from Lori Benitez and Frank Udvarhely; and appoint one (1) individual to the Planning Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2026, from applications received from Michael Bradford, Jeffrey Gold, Ed Kriz, Lewis McGeorge, Jason Probst, Jim Ratliff, and Ravi Sharma; and appoint one (1) individual to the Public Utilities Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2028, from the applications received from John Carrier and Frank Udvarhely; and appoint Jeffrey Gold and Gerald Feinerman to the Senior Commission to terms expiring December 31, 2026.

CONTACT: Katrina Six 916-774-5267 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Appoint one (1) individual to the Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee to a term expiring June 30, 2029, from the applications received from Lori Benitez and Frank Udvarhely; and
b. Appoint one (1) individual to the Planning Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2026, from the applications received from Michael Bradford, Jeffrey Gold, Ed Kriz, Lewis McGeorge, Jason Probst, Jim Ratliff, and Ravi Sharma; and
c. Appoint one (1) individual to the Public Utilities Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2028, from the applications received from John Carrier and Frank Udvarhely; and d. Appoint two (2) individuals to the Senior Commission to a term expiring December 31, 2026, from applications received from Jeffrey Gold and Gerald Feinerman.

City Clerk Technician Katrina Six made the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Motion by Councilmember Roccucci, seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to appoint Lori Benitez to the Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee to a term expiring June 30, 2029; and appoint Ed Kriz to the Planning Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2026; and appoint John Carrier to the Public Utilities Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2028; and appoint Jeffrey Gold and Gerald Feinerman to the Senior Commission to terms expiring December 31, 2026. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

37. Council Discretionary Funds Request - Roseville Joint Unified High School District (CITY

MANAGER DEPARTMENT - ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council consider a request for $3,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Roseville Joint Union High School District (RJUHSD) for the Local Scholarship Program. The district would use the funds to award three $1,000 scholarships to Class of 2026 students in May 2026. The scholarship will be open to seniors in the RJUHSD school district who will be continuing their education at a two or four-year college or trade school and either complete a Career Technical Education pathway at their high school and/or worked as a City employee or intern. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $16,321.

CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Consider a request for $3,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Roseville Joint Union High School District (RJUHSD) for the Local Scholarship Program.

City Clerk Carmen Avalos made the presentation to the City Council.

Roseville Joint Union High School District Marketing & Communications Coordinator Janelle Lott spoke in support of the item.

Motion by Vice Mayor Alvord, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to award $3,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for the Roseville Joint Union High School District for the Local Scholarship Program. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

38. Council Discretionary Funds Request - AllegiantVETS (CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT -

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council consider a sponsorship request in the amount of $500 from Council Discretionary Funds to support AllegiantVETS for their "All In for Veterans" Poker Tournament on November 7, 2025. The $500 will help with the prizes for the Poker Tournament. AllegiantVETS assists with transitioning veterans once the uniform comes off with job placement, hands-on career training, one-on-one mentorship, and provides America's heroes with the tools and network to thrive in civilian life. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $16,321.

CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Consider a sponsorship request in the amount of $500 from Council Discretionary Funds to support AllegiantVETS for their "All In for Veterans" Poker Tournament on November 7th, 2025.

City Clerk Carmen Avalos made the presentation to the City Council.

Marcus and Mark Haney spoke in support of the item.

Item died due to a lack of a motion.

39. Council Discretionary Funds Request - Downtown Roseville Partnership (CITY MANAGER

DEPARTMENT - ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council consider a request for $2,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Downtown Roseville Partnership for the 64th Annual Sylvia Besana Holiday Parade on December 6, 2025, in downtown Roseville. This family-friendly event includes food and craft booth vendors, and a parade with Santa. The parade presents an opportunity to drive business and interest in our downtown area as well as create additional revenue for our city through sales and increased business. In 2024, this event drew over 4,000 parade watchers, 60 parade units, and dozens of volunteers to make it a success. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $16,321.

CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Consider a request for $2,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Downtown Roseville Partnership for the 64th annual Sylvia Besana Holiday Parade on December 6, 2025, in downtown Roseville.

City Clerk Carmen Avalos made the presentation to the City Council.

Stephanie Hill spoke in support of the item.

Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to award $2,000 from Council Discretionary Funds to the Downtown Roseville Partnership for the 64th annual Sylvia Besana Holiday Parade. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

40. Labor Market Adjustments, Updates to the Management and Confidential Terms, Conditions and Understandings, and Temporary Salary Schedule Updates with Minimum Wage Increases (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: In accordance with current labor agreements, staff recommends Council approve the updated International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39 (Local 39), Roseville Police Association (RPA), Confidential and Management A and B salary schedules reflecting labor market adjustments to bring classifications to the 55% percentile effective

January 10, 2026. In addition, updates are recommended to the Management and Confidential Terms, Conditions and Understandings. The salary schedule updates cost $2,493,457 for the remaining 12 pay periods of the fiscal year, with the General Fund portion totaling $1,312,742, and the updated management terms will cost $7,126 to the General Fund. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 adopted budget includes adequate resources in the General Fund Contingency to fund this cost. The California Department of Finance has certified a minimum wage increase from $16.50 per hour to $16.90 per hour on January 1, 2026. A total of thirteen (13) temporary classifications are recommended to receive a salary increase. The fiscal impact to the Youth Development Fund is $1,250 and to the General Fund is approximately $23,800. There are adequate resources available in the FY2025-26 budget to absorb this cost. Staff is also requesting the addition of two (2) new temporary classifications and retitling of one (1) temporary classification to meet the City’s business needs.

CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7021 amending Ordinance No. 7015, the salary ordinance for employees represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39, as amended by appendix “J” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7022 amending Ordinance No. 6966, the salary ordinance for NonSworn employees represented by the Roseville Police Association, as amended by appendix “F” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and c. Adopt Ordinance No. 7023 amending Ordinance No. 6967, the salary ordinance for Confidential Employees, as amended by appendix “D” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
d. Adopt Ordinance No. 7024 amending Ordinance No. 7014, the salary ordinance for Management Employees, as amended by appendix “N” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
e. Adopt Resolution No. 25-388 to approve the updated Management and Confidential Terms, Conditions and Understandings, effective December 27, 2025; and f. Adopt Ordinance No. 7025 amending Ordinance No. 6969, the salary ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, as amended by appendix “Z” to be effective December 27, 2025, as an urgency measure.

Items 40 and 41 were heard concurrently.

Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson made the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa, seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to adopt Ordinance No. 7021 amending Ordinance No. 7015, the salary ordinance for employees represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 39, as amended by appendix "J" to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and Adopt Ordinance No. 7022 amending Ordinance No. 6966, the salary ordinance for Non-Sworn employees represented by the Roseville Police Association, as amended by appendix "F" to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and Adopt Ordinance No. 7023 amending Ordinance No. 6967, the salary ordinance for Confidential Employees, as amended by appendix "D" to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and Adopt Ordinance No. 7024 amending Ordinance No. 7014, the salary ordinance for Management Employees, as amended by appendix "N" to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and Adopt Resolution No. 25-388 to approve the updated Management and Confidential Terms, Conditions and Understandings, effective December 27, 2025; and Adopt Ordinance 7025 amending Ordinance No. 6969, the salary ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, as amended by appendix "Z" to be effective December 27, 2025, as an urgency measure. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Council Member Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

41. Roseville Police Officers' Association Successor Memorandum of Understanding (HUMAN

RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Roseville Police Officers’ Association for a term beginning January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2029. The cost to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 General Fund budget will be $859,348.

These costs will be covered by the existing budget. The overall ongoing projected costs of salary and benefit increases to the General Fund over the MOU four-year term is $10,831,359. This total contract cost amount includes the estimate for the general wage increases of two and onehalf percent in year two and year four, but does not account for labor market adjustments to maintain salaries at the 55th percentile of the market in year three that will be presented to the City Council in December 2028.

CONTACT: Janie Carduff 916-774-5205 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Resolution No. 25-389 approving a Successor Memorandum of Understanding for Sworn Employees represented by the Roseville Police Officers’ Association, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and b. Ordinance No. 7026 amending Ordinance No. 6898, the salary ordinance for sworn employees represented by the Roseville Police Officers’ Association, as amended by appendix “A” to be effective January 10, 2026 as an urgency measure.

Items 40 and 41 were heard concurrently.

Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson made the presentation to the City Council.

Motion by Councilmember Roccucci, seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to adopt Resolution No. 25-389 approving a Successor Memorandum of Understanding for Sworn Employees represented by the Roseville Police Officers' Association, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and Adopt Ordinance No. 7026 amending Ordinance No. 6898, the salary ordinance for sworn employees represented by the Roseville Police Officers' Association, as amended by appendix "A" to be effective January 10, 2026 as an urgency measure. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing

2. Presentation by staff

3. Presentation by applicant or appellant

4. Accept public testimony

5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period

6. Close the Public Hearing

7. City Council comments and questions

8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.

Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.

42. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Resolution (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING) Summary: Staff recommends adoption of a Resolution affirming the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan dated December 2023 is adopted and incorporated by reference as part of the Safety Element of the City's General Plan to comply with California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services guidelines. This will have no impact on the General Fund.

CONTACT: Lauren Hocker 916-774-5272 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-374 affirming the City of Roseville Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan dated December 2023 is adopted and incorporated by reference as part of the Safety Element of the City of Roseville General Plan.

Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 6:52 p.m.

Assistant Development Services Director Greg Bitter introduced Senior Planner Lauren Hocker who made the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 6:53 p.m.

Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to Adopt Resolution No. 25-374 affirming the City of Roseville Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan dated December 2023 is adopted and incorporated by reference as part of the Safety Element of the City of Roseville General Plan. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

43. Use Type Classifications and Definitions — Municipal Code Amendment (DEVELOPMENT

SERVICES - PLANNING)
Summary: At the October 23, 2025 Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Sections

19.08.080 and 19.95.030 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Use Type Classifications and Definitions clarifying the City's definitions for "kitchens" with the purpose of defining how dwelling units are classified in the Municipal Code.

CONTACT: Eric Singer 916-774-5536 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Sections 19.08.080 and 19.95.030 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Use Type Classifications and Definitions.

Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 6:54 p.m.

Assistant Development Services Director Greg Bitter introduced Associate Planner Eric Singer who made the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 7:01 p.m.

Motion by Vice Mayor Alvord, seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Sections 19.08.080 and 19.95.030 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Use Type Classifications and Definitions. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

44. Infill Objective Design Standards Approval (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Objective Design Standards for multi-family and single-family medium density residential projects for use within the City’s Infill Planning Area, with the intention of regulating the following aspects of development: site planning and building siting; edge and boundary treatments; topography and grading; access, circulation, and parking; service and storage; architectural design; landscaping; lighting; and signage. The proposed amendments will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Eric Singer 916-774-5536 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-379 approving the Infill Objective Design Standards for multifamily residential development and medium density residential development.

Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 7:01 p.m.

Associate Planner Eric Singer made the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 7:06 p.m.

Motion by Councilmember Roccucci, seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to Adopt Resolution No. 25-379 approving the Infill Objective Design Standards for multifamily residential development and medium density residential development. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

45. Backflow Prevention Inspection and Cross-Connection Control - Municipal Code Amendment and Updated Fine and Bail Schedule (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 14.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code, which prescribes regulations governing Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control, and provisionally approve the fine and bail schedule additions related to Cross-Connection Control Program enforcement, subject to the Municipal Code amendment being adopted at the second reading.

CONTACT: Rachel Tooker 916-746-1712 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 14.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code which prescribes regulations governing Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control; and

b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-371 adopting a fine and bail schedule for enforcement of municipal code violations and repealing Resolution 25-190 subject to the Municipal Code amendment being adopted at the second reading.

Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m.

Environmental Utilities Compliance Administrator Rachel Tooker made the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m.

Motion by Mendonsa, seconded by Roccucci, to introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 14.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code which prescribes regulations governing Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control; and Adopt Resolution No. 25-371 adopting a fine and bail schedule for enforcement of municipal code violations and repealing Resolution No. 25-190 subject to the Municipal Code amendment being adopted at second reading. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

46. City Council/Finance Authority — Issuance and Sale of 2026 Electric System Revenue Bonds (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council, acting in its capacity and as the Board of the Roseville Finance Authority, approve the issuance of the 2026 Roseville Finance Authority Electric System Revenue Bonds (2026 Bonds). The 2026 Bonds are being issued for an amount not to exceed $88,000,000 to finance the Roseville Power Plant #2 Repower Project and other electric system capital improvements. Issuance of these bonds will not impact the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Dennis Kauffman, Joanna Cucchi 916-774-5313, 916-746-1609 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-375 authorizing the issuance and sale of electric system revenue bonds by the Roseville Finance Authority, execution of a supplemental installment purchase contract, a contract of purchase for the bonds, and approving related documents and official actions; and
b. Adopt Roseville Finance Authority Resolution No. 3-25 a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Roseville Finance Authority authorizing the issuance and sale of electric system revenue bonds, approving a supplemental installment purchase contract, a trust agreement, a contract of purchase for the bonds, and approving related documents and official actions

Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m.

Assistant Electric Utility Director Joanna Cucchi made the presentation.

Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman continued the presentation to the City Council.

No public comment received.

Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 7:34 p.m.

Motion by Houdesheldt, seconded by Roccucci, to adopt Resolution No. 25-375 authorizing the issuance and sale of electric system revenue bonds by the Roseville Finance Authority, execution of a supplemental installment purchase contract, a contract of purchase for the bonds, and approving related documents and official actions; and Adopt Resolution Finance Authority No. 3-25 a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Roseville Finance Authority authorizing the issuance and sale of electric system revenue bonds, approving a supplemental installment purchase contract, a trust agreement, a contract of purchase for the bonds, and approving related documents and official actions. The motion passed.

Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.

X. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

No public comment received.

XI. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
Electric Risk Oversight Committee Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported.

Northern California Power Agency Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported on attendance.

Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation Committee Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported on attendance.

Councilmember Mendonsa reported on various community events.

Industry Visit to Germany - Mayor Bernasconi reported.

XII. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Bernasconi adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m.

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 1/21/2026
Item #: VIII.26
File #: 0102-16
Item ID: 2025-977
Title: Council Discretionary Funds Request - PRIDE Industries Contact: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Memo from Executive Assistant Heather Blanco and City Clerk Carmen Avalos requesting the City Council consider a request for a $2,500 sponsorship from Council Discretionary Funds for PRIDE Industries' 60th Anniversary Gala on February 28, 2026, at PRIDE Industries' Roseville headquarters. This milestone event supports the 60 years of inclusion, innovation, and impact, bringing together leaders, change makers, and community supporters. The event will spotlight the contributions of the Honorable Tony Coelho, former U.S. Congressman and architect of the American Disabilities Act, who will receive the Lifetime Achievement Award. Guests and sponsors will champion PRIDE Industries' mission to create employment opportunities for people with disabilities, making this event a tribute to the past and a commitment to the future. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $11,321.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council consider a request for $2,500 sponsorship from Council Discretionary Funds for PRIDE Industries' 60th Anniversary Gala on February 28, 2026, at PRIDE Industries' Roseville Headquarters.

BACKGROUND
PRIDE Industries has not requested Council Discretionary Funds in the past; however, they applied for Citizens’ Benefit Fund grant funding in 2024 but were not awarded funding.

The Citizens’ Benefit Fund was established in 1993 with the net proceeds from the sale of the Roseville Hospital. The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, annually appropriate up to 90 percent of the annual earnings of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of the City of Roseville. The City Council, without the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, may annually appropriate a minor amount up to $15,000 of the annual earnings for the purpose of improving the quality of life in Roseville.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Annually, the Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer allocates $15,000 of the annual earnings on the Citizens’ Benefit Fund per section 4.06.040 in the Municipal Code and includes it in the annual budget along with the Citizens’ Benefit Fund resources available for appropriation each year. These earnings are restricted for the purpose of improving the quality of life for Roseville residents and appropriated by the City Council. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $11,321.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The award of funds meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Heather Blanco, Executive Assistant
Dennis Kauffman, Chief Financial Officer/Assistant City Manager ATTACHMENTS:

1. PRIDE Industries Request
REVIEWERS:

Heather Blanco, City Manager Department - City Manager Created/Initiated - 12/24/2025 Heather Blanco, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/2/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/6/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/6/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/7/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/7/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 1/8/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 1/8/2026

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 1/21/2026
Item #: VIII.27
File #: 0102-16
Item ID: 2025-999
Title: Council Discretionary Funds - Spanger Elementary Parent-Teacher Club Contact: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends the City Council consider a request for a $500 sponsorship from Council Discretionary Funds for Spanger Elementary Parent-Teacher Club to support its annual Pancakes & PJ’s community fundraiser on March 19, 2026. The event typically serves more than 400 attendees and is designed to be inclusive and affordable for all families. Proceeds from the 2026 event will help to upgrade the 20-year-old bookroom, which provides class sets of books for all grade levels to support reading instruction. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $11,321.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council consider a request for a $500 sponsorship from Council Discretionary Funds for Spanger Elementary Parent-Teacher Club to support its annual Pancakes & PJ’s community fundraiser on March 19, 2026.

BACKGROUND
Spanger Elementary Parent-Teacher Club has not requested Council Discretionary Funds in the past. In FY2024-25 Spanger Elementary Parent-Teacher Club received Citizens' Benefit Fund grant funding in the amount of $14,700 to build an Elementary Outdoor Classroom on school grounds.

The Citizens’ Benefit Fund was established in 1993 with the net proceeds from the sale of the Roseville Hospital. The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, annually appropriate up to 90 percent of the annual earnings of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of the City of Roseville. The City Council, without the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, may annually appropriate a minor amount up to $15,000 of the annual earnings for the purpose of improving the quality of life in Roseville.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Annually, the Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer allocates $15,000 of the annual earnings on the Citizens’ Benefit Fund per section 4.06.040 in the Municipal Code and includes it in the annual budget along with the Citizens’ Benefit Fund resources available for appropriation each year. These earnings are restricted for the purpose of improving the quality of life for Roseville residents and appropriated by the City Council. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $11,321.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The

award of funds meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Heather Blanco, Executive Assistant
Dennis Kauffman, Chief Financial Officer/Assistant City Manager ATTACHMENTS:

1. Spanger Elementary Parent Teacher Club Request
REVIEWERS:

Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 12/24/2025 Heather Blanco, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/2/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/6/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/6/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/7/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/7/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 1/8/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 1/8/2026

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 1/21/2026
Item #: VIII.28
File #: 0215
Item ID: 2025-941
Title: Development Impact Fee Reports for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 Contact: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends Council accept the informational Development Impact Fee Reports prepared for the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2025. California state legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of development impact fees. This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the State Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66008.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the informational Development Impact Fee Reports prepared for the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2025.

BACKGROUND
California state legislation establishes legal and procedural requirements for the imposition of development impact fees ("DIFs"). This legislation was enacted as Assembly Bill (AB1600) and is codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66008 ("Mitigation Fee Act"). California Government Code section 66006(b) requires that, for each separate DIF account or fund established, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year;

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

2. The amount of the fee.

3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned.

5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended.

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.

8. The amount of refunds made (as pursuant to GC § 66001 (e)) due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing of incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made (as pursuant to GC § 66001 (f)) due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.

The attached Development Impact Fee Reports are provided for informational purposes and are also available on the City's website.

FISCAL IMPACT
The report is for informational purposes only. There is no impact to the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Development Impact Fee Reports meet the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Roseville-Development Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025

2. JPA_SPWA Development Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025 REVIEWERS:

Jeannine Thrash, Finance Department Created/Initiated - 12/15/2025 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department - Budget Approved - 12/19/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/23/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/23/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/6/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/8/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/8/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 1/8/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 1/8/2026

Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025

Rancho Cordova
1 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Reporting Requirements for Development Impact Fees ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Description of Development Impact Fees……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Fund Balance and Project Descriptions
Drainage Fees…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Public Facilities……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Local Sewer Connections Fees………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………11 Water Connection Fees…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 Traffic Mitigation Fees………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Downtown Specific Plan In-Lieu Parking Fee…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………19 Parks Fees…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….21 Electric Backbone Impact Fee……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….26 Solid Waste Impact Fee…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………27 Development Agreements Imposed Since 2004……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………28 Attachment 1……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….37

Rancho Cordova
2 | P a g e
Reporting Requirements for Development Impact Fees
In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of development impact fees (“DIFs”). This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections (GC §) 66000 through 66008 (“Mitigation Fee Act”). This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989.

GC § 66006(b) states the following requirements as pertains to DIFs:

For each separate account or fund established, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. (B) The amount of the fee.
(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. (D) The amount of the fees collected and interest earned. (E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees. (F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.
(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
(H) The amount of refunds made (as pursuant to GC § 66001(e)) due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made (as pursuant to GC § 66001(f)) due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.

GC § 65865(e) also requires that in any development agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2004, the City shall comply with GC § 66006 with respect to any fee it receives or cost it recovers.

Rancho Cordova
3 | P a g e
Description of Development Impact Fees
Drainage Fees
The Drainage Fee is established pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapters 4.48 and 4.49. Drainage fees are required for all new construction that occurs within the Dry Creek Watershed mitigation zone or the Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed mitigation zones. These mitigation zones are further broken down into sub-zones or sub-areas for which fees vary.

New development, and the expansion of existing development, within the City imposes a burden on the creeks and drainage infrastructure within the Dry Creek watershed and the Pleasant Grove and Curry Creek watershed by adding additional impervious surface, thereby adding more runoff, and by changing discharge rates. Some of the worst burdens imposed by development are on properties located within the Dry Creek watershed and Pleasant Grove and Curry Creek watershed downstream from the City, where additional run-off poses a threat of severe flooding and is a danger to life and property.

The drainage fees have been calculated so as to pay for those facilities listed in the capital improvement program. The fee is to be collected for public improvements and facilities for which an account has been established and funds appropriated, and for which a proposed construction schedule has been adopted.

Public Facilities Fee
The Public Facilities Fee is established pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 4.52. New development and the expansion of existing development within the City imposes burdens on existing public facilities and creates a need for additional public facilities. Such burdens may vary by the type of land use. The Public Facilities Fee is applied to new development and expansion of existing development to ensure adequate levels of public services and facilities are maintained. This fee spreads the costs of public facilities to development which creates the need for such public facilities, without generating any surplus to the general fund.

Sewer Connection Fees
Sewer connection fees are established pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 14.16. Additional fees may be applicable to properties within sewer special benefit assessment areas.
• Local Sewer Connection Fee - The local sewer connection fee is charged for each sewer unit required within the Roseville City limits connected to the City-owned public sewer.

Water Connection Fee
Water connection fees are established pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 14.08 and are applicable to all new water service connections within the City limits. This fee ensures the sharing of the costs associated with maintenance and expansion of the City’s raw water supply, water treatment, storage, and distribution facilities by those who receive the benefits thereof.

Rancho Cordova
4 | P a g e
Traffic Mitigation Fees
In 1988 the City of Roseville adopted a city-wide Traffic Mitigation Fee Program, requiring new development within the City to pay traffic impact fees. The fees collected through this program, in addition to other funding sources, allows the City to construct transportation improvements identified in its Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The fee program assesses fair-share costs to each jurisdiction based on their impact on the individual roadways from new development.

City / County Traffic Mitigation Fee - The City of Roseville and Placer County entered into a joint fee program for the purpose of funding improvements on Baseline Road and Walerga Road. The fee program assesses fair-share costs to other jurisdictions based on their impact on the individual improvements from new development. The fees associated with this fee program were originally collected by Roseville and Placer County. Fees collected by Roseville were remitted to Placer County quarterly to be held in one account. Effective July 2013, Fiddyment Road was removed from the program and individual agencies became responsible for holding the fees they collect in two separate accounts, one with Roseville and one with Placer County.

Downtown Specific Plan In-Lieu Parking Fee
This fee is established pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 19.31. Within the designated Commercial Mixed Use, Old Town and Central Business districts, a parking requirement serving nonresidential uses and residential uses, where a minimum of one space per unit is provided onsite for the residential units, may be met by a cash in-lieu payment to the City prior to issuance of a building permit, or a certificate of occupancy if no building permit is required. The fee is dedicated for use to offset the cost of public off-street parking within the Downtown Specific Plan area in the form of garages or public parking lots.

Park Fees- (Although Park fees were adopted pre- AB1600, they are still being included in this report.) Park fees are authorized pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapters 4.37 and 4.38. There are two different types of park fees applicable to all residential projects. The City-wide Park Fee funds park and recreation facilities intended to serve the entire community, and the Neighborhood and Community Park Fees fund park and recreation facilities intended to serve neighborhood areas. Park fees may vary based on fees and credits that a parcel may be subject to. City-wide Park Credits are granted to all parcels within specific plan areas that have entered into a Development Agreement with the City. Certain parcels may be subject to additional City-wide credits. These additional credits are typically granted for park property dedication above City standards, or other park obligations that were paid for by the original land developers.

Electric Backbone Impact Fee
The Electric Backbone Impact Fee applies to all new customers served by the City's Electric Department and any customer requesting a special service or capacity increase. Fees are based upon a per lot/unit charge and collected upon issuance of the building permit fees. Fees are authorized pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 4.54.

Rancho Cordova
5 | P a g e
Solid Waste Impact Fee
The Solid Waste Impact Fee applies to all new single-family and duplex units. This fee is paid to the Solid Waste Division of the Environmental Utilities Department to set-up solid waste service. Typically, this fee is paid by the developer during the time of construction so that service will be available upon move-in by the homeowner. Fees are authorized pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 9.12.

Development Agreement Fees Imposed Since 2004 (GC §65865(e)) • Sierra Vista Specific Plan Mitigation Fee Program –
o City Park Land Fee - This fee provides funding for the SVSP land that is intended to be dedicated for a City park. This fee component does not cover neighborhood parks.
o Improvements Fee - This fee is to provide funding for Sierra Vista landowners to be reimbursed for the design and completion of the SVSP improvements and to provide funding for open space and right-of-way dedications (e.g., school, fire station). o Administration - Establishment of the fee is for the purpose of equitably sharing the costs and burdens of administration of the SVSP Fee program throughout the specific plan with each landowner. • Watt Avenue and Vista Grande Boulevard Extension Traffic Mitigation Fee – This fee provides fair share funding for extensions of Watt Avenue between the Regional University Specific Plan and future Placer Parkway and “Road B” west of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan boundary to Baseline Road. This fee remains in effect until a city-wide funding mechanism is adopted in cooperation with Placer County. • Water Meter Retrofit / Conservation Program – This fee is established pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 14.08 for the maintenance and testing of water meters and installation of Encoder Receiver Transmitter (ERT) devices. • Traffic Signal Coordination Fee – This fee provides funding for the West Roseville Traffic Signal Interconnect project. • Bike Trail Fee – This fee funds construction of Class 1 bike trails through new development areas. • City-Wide Park In-Lieu Fee – This fee is paid as an alternative to dedication of City-wide park land, as specified in individual development agreements.
• Fire Tax Equivalent Fee – This fee applies to new growth areas and replaces the Fire Service Facilities Tax that expired in 2009. This fee provides funding for capital fire facilities and related equipment required to serve new growth areas. • Public Benefit Fee (AKA Community Benefit Fee) – This fee applies to new residential growth areas and properties rezoned from non-residential to residential land uses. This fee ensures that new residential growth areas will benefit current and future residents of Roseville through investment in various public infrastructure projects and activities. • Air Quality Mitigation Fee (applies to West Roseville Specific Plan) – This fee provides funding to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District to mitigate impacts to air quality resulting from new residential development.

Rancho Cordova
6 | P a g e
• Transit Shuttle Service Fee (applies to West Roseville Specific Plan) – This fee provides funding for a shuttle service between the West Roseville Specific Plan area and the I80/Watt Avenue light rail station. • Downtown Benefit Fee – Offsets the fiscal impacts associated with the unit increase within the West Roseville Specific Plan. • Westpark Drive off-site road fee – Developer’s fee will fund the construction cost of Westpark Drive north of the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant.
• Blue Oaks Boulevard Off-Site Road Fee – Developer’s pro-rata share of the cost obligation dedicated to segments 3 and 4 of the Blue Oaks Boulevard off-site improvements.
• Community Parks Public Benefit Fee – Developer’s fee will provide for park development and in-lieu land dedication.

Rancho Cordova
7 | P a g e
Fund Balance Summary
Drainage Fee
Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter 4.48
Ordinance
No. 5933
$17,401,050 1,533,406 394,579 - (82,660)
Pleasant
Grove
Retention
Basin (17,356)
No 100
Pleasant
Grove Curry
Creek
Watershed
Drainage
Mitigation
Fee Update (44,782)
YesAugust
2023
67 Pleasant
Grove
Stormwater
Retention
Facility (2,217,403)
No 100
$16,966,833

Rancho Cordova
8 | P a g e
Drainage Project Descriptions
Pleasant Grove Retention Basin (Project # 400006) - Funding for this mandatory mitigation project will design and construct an approximately 2,500 acrefeet flood detention basin in the Al Johnson Wildlife Area/”Reason Farm Property” to mitigate various development projects. FY2022-23 funding was used to begin planning efforts for grant identification and development of an RFP for design. The project will be constructed when enough developer fees and grant funds have been collected to fund construction.

Pleasant Grove Curry Creek Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee Update (Project# 500258) – This project provides funding for a Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee Update in FY2022-23. The last Pleasant Grove Curry Creek Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee Update was completed on July 1, 2018, and these updates are expected to occur approximately every five years.

Pleasant Grove Stormwater Retention Facility (Project# 500360) - Funding for this mandatory mitigation project will design and construct up to approximately 3,800 acre-feet flood detention basin in the Al Johnson Wildlife Area/"Reason Farms Property" to mitigate various development projects. It is possible that the basin will become a regional facility in collaboration with Placer County and multiple developers (Memorandum of Understanding pending).

The project will be constructed when enough developer fees and grant funds have been collected to fund construction.

Dry Creek Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter 4.49
Dry Creek
Drainage
Basin
Ordinance
No. 2617
$331 7,716 36 - (7,751) $332 No Unknown

Rancho Cordova
9 | P a g e
Public Facilities Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of
CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter

4.52 Ordinance No.
6290
$31,706,791 6,933,934 700,205 (538,593) (87,742)
Oak Street
Extension of
the Miners
Ravine Trail (6,744,822)
YesStarted
FY2020
4 East Radio
Site
Relocation (6,362)
YesStarted
FY2020
14 116 S. Grant
Street
Building
Improv. (1,270,691)
YesStarted
FY2021
16 Council
Chambers
Conference
Room Design
and
Construction (85,925)
Complete 100
Polic Dept.

Facility
Expansion,
Design and
Construction (581,914)
YesDecember
2023
91 Council
Chambers
Renovation (186,815)
YesStarted
2025
48 $29,838,066

Rancho Cordova
10 | P a g e
Public Facilities Fee, continued
*Transfers out: Transfer $96,206 from Fund 3355 (Public Facilities) to Fund 2901 (RFA Debt Service) for 2015 316 Vernon Debt Service.

Loan payment of $33,346 for principal reduction of the loan to pay back the Fleet Replacement Fund (Fund 4005)-Loan purpose: Funding of design & construction for Oak Street Parking Garage. (Interest rate of 2.46% in FY25; matures 6/30/35); Loan payment of $409,041 for principal reduction of the loan to pay back the Strategic Improvement Fund (Fund 1030)-Loan purpose: Funding of the 316 Vernon Building Project # 400055 (Interest rate of 2.46% in FY25; matures 6/30/27).

Public Facilities Fee Project Descriptions
Oak Street Extension of the Miners Ravine Trail (Project# 400028) - Supplemental review, design, and construction of a Class -1 off-street trail parallel to Oak street from Lincoln Street to Royer Park at the Icehouse Bridge.

East Radio Site Relocation (Project# 400126) - The project requires acquisition and a 180-foot tower along with a shelter, generator and fuel tank to meet the City’s short and long-term needs.
116 S. Grant Street Building Improvements (Project# 500160) - This project provides funding for building improvements for the 116 S. Grant Street building. The project scope includes office space design and construction to support customer service functions, such as utility billing and customer solutions. Funding provided through the Public Facilities Fund is for tenant improvements related to the relocation of Police staff.

Council Chambers Conference Room Design and Construction (Project# 500427) - This project provides funding to design and construct an additional conference room adjacent to the Council Chambers for Council use during closed sessions and staff use during City Council meetings.

Police Department Facility Expansion, Design and Construction (Project# 500428) - This project provides funding to design, construct, and expand the existing Police Department facility. The expansion includes new public and secured parking, the acquisition of Corporation Yard Road from Placer County, and expansion and tenant improvements to training and locker room areas.

Council Chambers Renovation (Project#500528) - This project provides funding for renovations to the Council Chambers and a new lobby including design and construction.

Rancho Cordova
11 | P a g e
Local Sewer Connection Fees
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of
CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter

14.16 Ordinance No.
6100 $10.,330,772 1,060,289 371,873 - (5,155)
Wastewater
Collections
Building
Expansion (209,580)
YesStarted
2021
96 Sewer
routing
Alternatives
Analysis (50,816)
YesStarted
2023
100
$11,497,383
Local Sewer Connection Project Descriptions
Wastewater Collections Building Expansion (Project# 500419) - The current building is under sized for current Wastewater Collection staff and equipment. A study will be conducted to determine the most cost-effective method for expansion of building space to add a conference/training room, expand warehouse storage, and possibly add or relocate office space. Utility improvements will also be required for the added building space. Using the study the city will select final improvements, and a preliminary design will be developed for a design build construction.

Sewer Routing Alternatives Analysis (Project# 500546) - This project provides funding for an alternatives analysis related to future sewer routing to the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP). Anticipated developments west of the treatment plant will require sewer conveyance to the PGWWTP.

Currently, there is no coordinated approach among these developments, which could lead to the installation of multiple force mains, including redundant ones, potentially resulting in up to ten force mains along Blue Oaks Blvd. The objective of this study is to gather existing information and assess potential alternatives that may better serve the long-term interests of both the City and Placer County.

Rancho Cordova
12 | P a g e
Water Connection Fees
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter

14.08 Ordinance No.
6100 $58,847,470 19,871,680 1,467,623 443,350 (4,161,165) West Side
Tank and
Pump Station (15,955)
YesStarted
2006
100
Regional
Water
Reliability
Study (30,600)
YesStarted
2015
73 Advanced
Metering
Infrastr. Proj. (4,813)
YesStarted
2016
25 Pleasant Grove
Blvd. Widening
Project
5,293
Charged
to this
fund in
erroradded
back
n/a
Cooperative
Potable Water
Transmission
Infrastructure (73,515)
YesStarted
2021
100
2024 Potable
Water Master
Plan and
Hydraulic
Model Update (521,377)
YesStarted
2020 100

Rancho Cordova
13 | P a g e
Water Connection Fees, continued
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Aquifer
Storage and
Recovery
Well-Design 495,706
YesStarted
2019 100
Aquifer
Storage and
Recovery
Wells 9
Westbrook
and 18 Solaire (18,531)
YesStarted
2020
100
Aquifer
Storage and
Recovery
Wells 13
Campus Oaks
and 19 Misty
Wood (2,857,472)
YesStarted
2023
59 Cooperative
Raw Water
Supply
Reliability
Project (260,648)
YesStarted
2025
67 RiverArc
(100,000)
YesStarted
2025
60 Cooperative
Treated Water
Supply
Reliability
Project (153,588)
YesStarted
2025
67 $72,933,458
*Transfers in: $58,350 from the Water Fund for Folsom Pump Station; $385,000 for loan payment from Water Operations Fund-Loan purpose: Advanced Metering Project (Interest rate 5.00% (FY18- FY29); Loan matures 6/30/30). $4,161,165 of the expenditures were debt related.

Rancho Cordova
14 | P a g e
Water Connection Fees Project Descriptions
West side tank/pump Stn Proj (Project# 400014) - Design and construct a six-million-gallon water storage tank, pump station, and chemical addition facility at the City's 5.1-acre site located in the West Roseville Specific Plan. The work will include site master planning to accommodate two six-million-gallon tanks and satellite facility for Water Distribution operations.

Regional Water Supply Reliability Study (Project# 400063) - The project funds the study conducted by the Regional Water Authority for regional water supply reliability, and it is inclusive of the development of a federally recognized regional water bank.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project (Project# 400099) - An Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system is required to offer better meter data to customers. AMI would introduce two-way communication for meters allowing remote reads and greater interaction between the utility and its customers. An AMI system also provides customers a detailed view of their water usage, enabling them to make changes to increase their water efficiency. Finally, an AMI system provides better system reliability by bringing enhanced demand management and capital efficiencies. This project progresses from a business case through a third-party implementation and finishes with the installed and operating AMI system.

Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project (Project# 500115) -This project will provide funding to widen Pleasant Grove Boulevard from two lanes to three lanes in each direction into the center median, from Foothills Boulevard west to Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard.

Cooperative Potable Water Transmission Infrastructure (Project# 500147) - This project provides funding for planning, design, and construction of additional potable water conveyance infrastructure to support reliable water supply delivery to the City of Roseville customers. The project is anticipated to be a partnership effort between the City and the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA). 2024 Potable Water Master Plan (Project# 500148) - This project provides funding for a potable water systems evaluation to guide the Water Utility in terms of infrastructure planning and improvements implementation to both existing and future storage and distribution infrastructure to reliably support the City's potable water demand through buildout.

Aquifer Storage and Recovery Well –Design (Project# 500155) -This project designs and constructs a potable water well with aquifer storage and recovery facilities based on recommendations from the Groundwater Strategic Plan.

Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells 9 Westbrook and 18 Solaire (Project# 500157) -This project provides funding for the construction of potable water wells with aquifer storage and recovery facilities based on recommendations from the Groundwater Strategic Plan.

Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells 13 Campus Oaks and 19 Misty Wood (Project# 500315) - This project provides funding for the construction of potable water wells with aquifer storage and recovery facilities based on recommendations from the Groundwater Strategic Plan.

Cooperative Raw Water Supply Reliability Project (Project# 500505) - This project provides funding to design and construct infrastructure improvements needed to take delivery of approximately ten million gallons per day (MGD) of Middle Fork Project water supplies directly to the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (BRWTP). This project will increase water supply reliability in all hydrologic water year types and avoid the vulnerability of the single intake structure at the Folsom Reservoir.

Rancho Cordova
15 | P a g e
RiverArc (Project# 500512) - As part of the Environmental Utilities (EU) on-going efforts to increase the resiliency of Roseville’s water supply, including during drought and other emergency scenarios, EU is participating in The RiverArc Project, which is a multi-agency project to divert water through existing modern intakes from the Sacramento River, convey to a new regional water treatment plant, and distribute surface water through a mix of new and existing pipelines to Roseville and other local water agencies.

Cooperative Treated Water Supply Reliability Project (Project# 500543) - This project provides funding to conduct a feasibility assessment to determine if this project concept; to convey treated water from Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) Pressure Zone 1 and deliver water to a potential future intertie with the City of Roseville's Water Distribution system in Pressure Zone 2, is feasible. If this project is deemed feasible and implemented, it would increase water supply reliability in all hydrologic water year types. A separate future City Council action will be required for moving into the installation/construction phase of the project.

Rancho Cordova
16 | P a g e
Traffic Mitigation Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter

4.44 Misc.

Road Improv.

Ordinance
No. 6289
$45,494,932 10,054,807 906,100 - (304,164)
Washington
and Andora
Widening (13) No 80
City Traffic
Model
Update (462,102) No 100
Washington
Blvd All
American
Roundabout (15,686)
YesStarted
Summer
2022
6 Roseville
Parkway
Extension (10,963,916)
YesStarted
2023
100
Pleasant
Grove Blvd.

Widening
Project (6,167,889)
No 77
Westbrook Bl
Payson AveOctave Ave
Intersection
imp and
Pleasant
Grove CM (8,618)
YesStarted
Feb 2021
100

Rancho Cordova
17 | P a g e
Traffic Mitigation Fee, continued
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Traffic Signal
Maintenance
Shop
Expansion (312,169)
YesStarted
March
2022
34 Traffic Signal
and Roadway
Improvements
for Citywide
Sports
Complex (4,400,663)
YesStarted
April 2024
74 Westbrook
Blvd. Signal
Installation
Project
(134,107)
YesStarted
January
2025
100
$33,686,512
Traffic Mitigation Fee Project Descriptions
Washington and Andora Widening (Project#400015) - This project provides funding for widening Washington Blvd from two lanes to four lanes from Sawtell to Diamond Oaks, including widening the Andora Underpass beneath the UPRR tracks. Phase one of the project is complete.

City Traffic Model Update (Project# 400189) - This project funds the ongoing model, land use and project updates for the Citywide Traffic Model.

Washington Blvd All American Roundabout (Project# 500070) – This project includes a new two-lane roundabout at the intersection of Washington Blvd and All America City Blvd.

Roseville Parkway Extension (Project# 500078) - This project will design and construct the portion of Roseville Parkway between Washington & Foothills, including the bridge over UPRR and Industrial.

Rancho Cordova
18 | P a g e
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project (Project#500115) - This project provides funding to widen Pleasant Grove Boulevard from two lanes to three lanes in each direction into the center median, from Foothills Boulevard west to Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. Construction is anticipated to extend through FY2024-25.

Westbrook Bl Payson Ave-Octave Ave Intersection imp and Pleasant Grove CM (Project# 500171) - This project constructed a new traffic signal at Westbrook and Octave/Payson, and the CMS on PG Blvd.

Traffic Signal Maintenance Shop Expansion (Project# 500226) - This project provides funding for the design and renovation at a vacant city-owned building space. This CIP will repurpose a vacant city-owned facility to accommodate the Public Works Department, Engineering Division, Traffic Signal Maintenance Section's current needs and future expected growth.

Traffic Signal and Roadway Improvements for Citywide Sports Complex (Project# 500317) - This project includes the installation of ultimate traffic signal and roadway improvements at the intersections of Blue Oaks Boulevard and Westbrook Boulevard, Blue Oaks Boulevard and Hayden Parkway, Westbrook Boulevard and Brookstone Drive (N), and Westbrook Boulevard and Brookstone Drive (S) to accommodate planned construction of the Roseville Soccer Complex project (400068) east of Westbrook Boulevard. The project will provide left turn lanes off Westbrook Boulevard onto the Roseville Soccer Complex and traffic signal improvements serving the property. The traffic study for the Roseville Soccer Complex project requires these improvements to be complete for the opening of the Soccer Complex.

Westbrook Boulevard Signal Installation Project (Project# 500495) -This project provides funding to design and construct five traffic signals along Westbrook Boulevard at Solaire Drive, Earl Rush Drive, Nicole Gee Drive, Vista Grande Boulevard, and Sierra Village Drive.

Rancho Cordova
19 | P a g e
City/ County Traffic Mitigation Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter 4.45
Misc.

Road
Improv.

Ordinance
No. 5203
$13,207,961 1,941,230 394,121 3,369,458 (26,230)
Baseline
Traffic
Signals
(74,410)
YesStarted
2023
94 Riego
RoadBaseline
Road
Impr. (66,892)
YesStarted
2023
100
$18,745,238
Transfer in: Loan disbursement of $3,369,458 from Strategic Improvement Fund to provide funding for installing traffic signals and related improvements along Baseline Road at Locust Road and Pleasant Grove Road. Repayment commences 6/30/28. Interest rate 2.46% (FY25); Loan matures 6/30/35.

City/County Traffic Mitigation Fee Project Description
Baseline Traffic Signals (Project# 500299) - This project provides funding for the installation of traffic signals and related improvements along Baseline Road at Locust Road and Pleasant Grove Road. The existing stop signs along Baseline Road will not have sufficient capacity to manage the traffic expected with the incoming Baseline Marketplace project. The regional shopping destination is expected to draw shoppers from not only Roseville and Placer County, but Sacramento County to the south and Sutter County to the west. Therefore, it is in Roseville's best interest to invest in infrastructure improvements to accommodate the anticipated traffic demand and provide convenient access to Roseville's shopping destinations for neighboring jurisdictions. This project was originally set-up in the Strategic Improvement Fund (SIF), but funding is now being moved to the City County Mitigation Fund and an interfund loan from the SIF will be established. As fee revenue is received in the City County Mitigation Fund, the SIF will be reimbursed. This project is an interim improvement to meet the needs of the region today while the City, Placer County, and Sutter County work through the funding plan, design, environmental approvals, and eventual construction of a future widened Baseline Road from Foothills Boulevard to Highway 99.

Riego Road-Baseline Road Improvements (Project# 500331) - Riego Road/Baseline Road needs to be widened and improved to support future planned and approved development and provide a reliable and safe east-west connection to meet anticipated traffic demands in the South Placer and South Sutter region. In conjunction with the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA), County of Placer, and the County of Sutter, the City of Roseville will mutually

Rancho Cordova
20 | P a g e
develop the analysis and related reports necessary to adopt a regional transportation funding and financing plan. Additionally, the multi-jurisdictional group will develop an implementation plan for the Riego Road/Baseline Road project. This project represents the City of Roseville's share of the total endeavor.

Downtown Specific Plan In-Lieu Parking Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code Chapter

19.31 Misc.

Downtown
Parking
Improv.

Resolution No.
09-124;
Ordinance No.
5428 $135,118 - (3,175) 42,078 (56,031) $117,990 No
Unknown
at this
time
Transfer in: Loan payment of $611,518 from Downtown Benefit Fund to Downtown Parking fund to provide the resource to pay the loan payment to the Strategic Improvement Fund.

Transfer out: $569,440 for principal loan payment to Strategic Improvement Fund. Loan purpose: Funding of a portion of the Oaks Street Parking Garage. Interest rate 2.46% (FY25); Loan matures 6/30/28.

Rancho Cordova
21 | P a g e
Park Fees – (Although Park fees were adopted pre- AB1600, they are still being included in this report.) Neighborhood and Community Park Fees
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)(1)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code Chapter

4.37 Ordinance
Nos. 2178,
2969, and
3033 $30,925,148 6,880,205 703,804 - (37,562)
Soccer Complex (232,987)
YesStarted
2023
5 Saugstad Park
Improvements (243,618)
No 98
Riego Creek Park
- F-51 (1,027,703)
Yes 100
John Byouk Park -
JM-50 (2,454,158) No 100
Solaire Park -
WB-50 (784) No 74
FD-51
Neighborhood
Park (91,770)
No 100
SVSP JMC Ph1
and Ph2 Bike
Trails (192,224)
No 100
KT-52 School
Park (292,468) No 99
JM-51
Neighborhood
Park (121)
No 100
JM-52
Neighborhood
Park (90)
No 100

Rancho Cordova
22 | P a g e
Neighborhood and Community Park Fees, continued
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)(1)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30,
2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
The Villages at
Sierra Vista FD24 (143,471)
YesComplete 100
C-63
Neighborhood
Park (164,794)
YesStarted
FY2024
77 CO-61
Neighborhood
Park (350)
Unknown
at this
time
100
FD-50
Neighborhood
Park (155)
Unknown
at this
time
100
Campus Oaks
Park- CO-64 (768,000)
YesStarting
FY2026
37 $32,858,902
1) Includes Neighborhood Park Fees, Bike Trail Fees and Paseo Fees.

Neighborhood and Community Park Fees Project Descriptions Roseville Soccer Complex (Project# 400068) - This project provides funding for an eight to ten field complex for soccer and other rectangular sports. Other amenities include large picnic/pavilions, a universally accessible playground, a small corporation yard, restrooms, and parking.

Saugstad Park Renovations (Project# 400122) - This project provides funding for phase one of renovations to Saugstad Park. The overall improvements include the addition of a skate track, a fitness court, basketball and pickleball courts, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and parking lot upgrades.

Riego Creek Park F-51 (Project# 500040) - This project provides funding for the construction of an 11.8-acre school site park. The project is currently in the public outreach phase, and amenities have not been determined. However, those being considered include baseball and softball fields, restrooms, a covered children’s play area, and a large group picnic area.

Rancho Cordova
23 | P a g e
John Byouk Park - JM-50 (Project# 500100) - This project provides funding for the construction of a 7.73-acre school park site. The project is currently in the public outreach phase, and amenities have not been determined. However, those being considered include baseball and soccer fields, restrooms, a children's play area, and a large group picnic area.

Solaire Park – WB-50 (Project# 500102) - This project provides funding for the design and construction of a 9.6-acre school park in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area. The park amenities include a ballfield, off-street parking, children’s play area, shaded picnic and looped pathways. The construction is anticipated to begin in Spring/Summer 2022.

FD-51 Neighborhood Park (Project# 500185) - This project provides funding for design and construction of a neighborhood park in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area. The park amenities will be determined during the design phase of the project.

SVSP JMC Ph1 and Ph2 Bike Trails (Project# 500216) - This project is for multi-use trail construction in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan per the approved Development Agreement with John Mourier Construction, Inc.

KT-52 School Park (Project# 500241) – This project provides funding for the design and construction of a 7.61-acre school park site. The project will begin in FY2022-23 with public outreach to determine appropriate park amenities. It is anticipated that the design may include formal game fields, restrooms, a children's play area, a shaded area for picnicking, and a looped path.

JM-51 Neighborhood Park (Project# 500289) - This project provides funding for the design and construction of a 2.62-acre neighborhood park. Typical park features include a children's play area, a shaded picnic area, looped pathways, and other amenities.

JM-52 Neighborhood Park (Project# 500290) – This 1.5-acre park project provides funding for a neighborhood park. While design has not yet been undertaken, typical park features include a children's play area, a shaded picnic area, looped pathways, and other features.

The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 (Project# 500320) - This project is for the construction of a Class I Bike Trail per the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Development Agreement with FD-24 LLC. Located on Assessor's Parcels: 498-180-002;498-020-039;498-020-040 C-63 Neighborhood Park (Project# 500351) - This project provides funding for a 2.5-acre neighborhood park. Typical features of a neighborhood park include a children's play area, a shaded picnic area, looped pathways, among other features.

CO-61 Neighborhood Park (Project# 500353) - This project provides funding for a 5.04-acre neighborhood park. Typical features of a neighborhood park include a children's play area, a shaded picnic area, looped pathways, among other features.

FD-50 Neighborhood Park (Project# 500354) - This project provides funding to design and construct a new 1.73-acre neighborhood park. Typical amenities of a neighborhood park include a children's play area, a shaded picnic area, and looped pathways, among other features.

Campus Oaks Park- CO-64 (Project# 500463) - This 8+ acres park project provides funding for developer reimbursement as well as future phases to include a skate park, bicycle motocross (BMX) track and parkour.

Rancho Cordova
24 | P a g e
City-wide Park Fee - (Although Park fees were adopted pre-AB1600, they are still being included in this report.) Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)(1)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter

4.38 Ordinance No.
2424
$14,300,445 5,437,559 327,396 652,064 (52,919)
Park Site 56
Gibson Park (1,636) No 57
Soccer
Complex
(110,817)
YesStarted
2023
11 Denio Family
Park (Parcel
F-54) (1,609,693)
No 100
Fiddyment
Homestead (115,267) No Unknown
Mahany Park
Backstop
Repairs (119,908)
YesStarted
FY2025
100
The Courts at
Gibson Park
Frontage (47,000)
Started
FY2025 48
$18,660,224
(1)Includes Park Construction Fees and In-Lieu Fees.
*Transfer out: $652,064 for loan principal payment to Fleet Replacement Fund 4005-Loan Purpose: The purpose of this loan is to provide funding for the Harry Crabb Park project. The Citywide Park Fund will repay the loan from moneys it receives from the Roseville Finance Authority (RFA) 2017A savings (Interest rate FY25: 2.46%); Loan matures 6/30/26.

Rancho Cordova
25 | P a g e
City-wide Park Fee Project Descriptions
Park Site 56 Gibson Park (Project# 400004) – This project provides funding to construct an initial phase of the 12.5-acre city-wide park focused on sports, including lighted basketball, tennis, and pickle ball courts.

Soccer Complex (Project# 400068) - Sports complex at Blue Oaks Blvd/Phillip Road/Hayden Parkway. The project is under construction and includes 10 lighted synthetic long fields, restrooms, storage facilities, a children's universally accessible playground, shaded picnic area(s), and pedestrian pathways.

Denio Family Park (Parcel F-54) (Project# 400118) - Design and construction of park, including a disc golf course, fenced off-leash dog park and support features such as off-street parking restrooms and shaded picnic areas.

Fiddyment Homestead (Project# 500355) – This project provides funding to develop a visioning plan for the historic Fiddyment Homestead at Pistachio Regional Park as a first phase. The plan would include outdoor interpretive opportunities for the existing structures preserved onsite in addition to providing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility for a walking interpretive tour. The second phase will be to construct approved improvements.

Mahany Park Backstop Repairs (Project# 500462) - This project provides funding to repair damage to the backstop at the large field at Mahany Park. Damage was caused by the windstorms in 2021.

The Courts at Gibson Park Frontage (Project# 500465) - This project provides funding to add landscaping and irrigation along the frontage at Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive.

Rancho Cordova
26 | P a g e
Electric Backbone Impact Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
and other
revenue
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter

4.54 Sierra Vista
Transformer
No. 2 Addition
Ordinance
6097 $6,492,432 2,514,319 158,037 - (51,137) $9,113,650 YesNovember
Started
2016 75

Rancho Cordova
27 | P a g e
Solid Waste Impact Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded by
Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code Chapter

9.12 Solid
Waste
Services
Set Up
Ordinance
No. 6501
$7,376,927 820,295 174,821 - (147,671) $8,224,372 No
Unknown
at this time

Rancho Cordova
28 | P a g e
DA Fees Imposed Since 2004
Sierra Vista Specific Plan Fee Program-Admin
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Sierra Vista
Specific Plan
Ord. No.
4932 $637,784 280,828 16,494 - (119,932) $815,174 - -
Sierra Vista Specific Plan Fee Program-Improvements
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Sierra Vista
Specific Plan
Ord. No.
4932 $81,506 (55,248) 1,587
-
(68,980) ($41,135) - -
Sierra Vista Specific Plan Fee Program- Park Land
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
(1)
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Sierra Vista
Specific Plan
Ord. No.
4932 $37,731 2,284,168 18,827 - (2,284,168) $56,558 - - (1)$2,284,168 in expenditures was for quarterly fee reimbursements made to the developers for park land.

Watt Avenue and Vista Grande Boulevard Extension Traffic Mitigation Fee Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Creekview
and Sierra
Vista DA
Per DA N/A - - - - - - -
Note: The fee will be based on a fair share allocation. No fee will be established until there is a need to extend the road past city limits.

Please refer to the Development Agreements on the City of Roseville’s website: Development Agreements

Rancho Cordova
29 | P a g e
DA Fees Imposed Since 2004, continued
Water Meter Retrofit/ Conservation Program
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapter

14.07 Maint.
and
Testing of
Water
Meters
and ERT
Installs
Ord. No.
4001 $1,930,784 118,053 44,924 (46,146)
Water
Meter
Retrofit (134,239)
Yes- Started
FY2020
100
$1,913,376
Water Meter Retrofit Fee Project Description
Water Meter Retrofit (Project# 500024) – This project will finish the retrofitting of meters and backflow devices for remaining residential and commercial water service locations.

Traffic Signal Coordination Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
West
Roseville
Specific Plan
West
Roseville
Traffic
Signal
Interconn.

Per
individual
DA
$2,947,832 23,762 67,275 (49,330) $2,989,539
No
Unknown
at this
time
Please refer to the Development Agreements on the City of Roseville’s website: Development Agreements

Rancho Cordova
30 | P a g e
DA Fees Imposed Since 2004, continued
Bike Trail Fee- Creekview
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)(1)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Creekview
Specific Plan
Bike Trails Per
individual
DA $772,039 255,304 19,593 (1,211) $1,045,725
No
Unknown
at this
time
Please refer to the Development Agreements on the City of Roseville’s website: Development Agreements Bike Trail Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)(1)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
West
Roseville
Specific Plan
Misc.

Class 1
Bike Trails
Per
individual
DA $368,127 1,317 8,928 158,150 (221,279) $315,243
No
Unknown
at this
time
(1)$698,447 in bike trail fees were collected through various Park Development Funds, which are included with the Neighborhood and Community Park Fees.

This is reporting the Bike Trail Funds 3323 and 3380.
*Transfers in: $158,150 from various Community Facilities Districts for bike trail maintenance.

City-Wide Park In-Lieu Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
Sierra Vista
Specific Plan
Misc. Park
Projects
per DA
Per
individual
DA $24,675 - 568 - - $25,243
No
Unknown
at this
time
Please refer to the Development Agreements on the City of Roseville’s website: Development Agreements

Rancho Cordova
31 | P a g e
DA Fees Imposed Since 2004, continued
Fire Tax Equivalent Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee (1)
Project
Fee Formula Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out) (2)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of
CIP
Funded
by Fee
Municipal
Code
Chapter

4.46 Per individual
DA’s after
Dec. 2009
$7,150,780 2,065,345 99.757 (1,307,025) (94,317)
Fire
Station 8 (5,062,244)
Complete 100
$2,852,296
(1)Roseville Municipal code 4.46 had a sunset date of December 31, 2009. Individual DA's reference a fee 'equivalent to' this original fire service construction tax fee. (2) Transfers out $1,307,025 for loan principal payment. Loan purpose: To provide funding for Fire Station No. 8 to augment the currently available balance in the Fire Facilities Fund. Interest rate 2.46% (FY25); Loan matures 6/30/28.
*Please refer to the Development Agreements on the City of Roseville’s website: Development Agreements Fire Tax Equivalent Fee Project Description
Fire Station 8 (Project# 500067) - This project includes the design and construction of a Fire Station to service residents and businesses in the Woodcreek/Blue Oaks general area.

Rancho Cordova
32 | P a g e
DA Fees Imposed Since 2004, continued
Public/Community Benefit Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project
Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded
by Fee
All DA’s
since 2004
Per
individual
DA $16,855,721 2,088,435 445,997 4,411,302 (54,242)
East Radio Site
Relocation (24,111) No

50 Westbrook
Blvd -
Segment 4 (1,247,509)
Complete Reimb.
by dev.

Historic Old
Town Parking
Lot Improv.

Project (925,671)
YesStarted July
2022
To be
paid back
by Loan
$21,549,923
*Transfers in: $1,750,000 for operations and $2,500,000 for capital for future projects. $409,041 for loan payment received from Public Facilities Fund- Loan purpose: Funding of the 316 Vernon Building Project # 400055 (Interest rate of 2.46% in FY25; matures 6/30/27); $569,441 for loan payment received from Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fees. Loan purpose: Funding of a portion of the Oaks Street Parking Garage (Interest rate 2.46% in FY25); matures 6/30/28).

This loan will be repaid by Downtown Parking in-Lieu fees collected on an annual basis and the Downtown Benefit Fee from collections in Fiddyment Farm Phase 3; $377,351 for loan payment received from Successor Agency RDA Fund- Loan purpose: JCPenney Building at 238 Vernon Street (RCDC pass through payment from KMS) (Interest rate 0.28%; matures 6/30/26); $608,102 for loan payment received from Successor Agency RDA Fund -Loan purpose: Funding of RCDC (Interest rate 0.28%; matures 6/30/30); $184,000 for loan payment received from Successor Agency RDA Fund -Loan purpose: Riverside Avenue Infrastructure and Streetscape Enhancement Project (Interest rate 0.28%; matures 6/30/28); $1,785,458 for loan payment received from Successor Agency RDA Fund -Loan purpose: Automall wall remodel (Interest rate 0.28%; matures 6/30/40).

Transfers out: $354,536 to General Fund for Woodcreek Golf subsidy; $48,096 to RFA Fund 2901 for debt service for 316 Vernon Street; $3,369,458 to City County Traffic Mitigation Fee.

Loan disbursement of $3,369,458 to City/County Traffic Mitigation Fund 3395 to provide funding for installing traffic signals and related improvements along Baseline Road at Locust Road and Pleasant Grove Road. Interest rate 2.46% (FY25); Loan matures 6/30/35. Total transfers rounded to nearest dollar amounts. Repayment commences 6/30/28.

Please refer to the Development Agreements on the City of Roseville’s website: Development Agreements

Rancho Cordova
33 | P a g e
Public/Community Benefit Fee Project Description
East Radio Site Relocation (Project# 400126) - The City's current east radio site has many limitations including emergency power, coverage, capacity and a risky building lease status. These limitations increase the level of risk to provide clear and reliable communications in East Roseville. This CIP is designed to relocate the site to a location that will provide for sustainable high levels of communication services.

Westbrook Blvd - Segment 4 (Project# 500413) - This project completes the last segment of Westbrook Boulevard in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. This segment is between Earl Rush Drive and Nicole Gee Drive. The SIF loaned the money to construct the developer's portion of the improvements. The developer will reimburse 100% of the SIF funds used.

Historic Old Town Parking Lot Improvements Project (Project# 500545) - This project will acquire a 1.64-acre parcel from Union Pacific Railroad Company east of Historic Old Town for the purposes of constructing a surface parking lot adding additional parking spaces to Historic Old Town as identified in the "Historic Old Town Roseville Parking Study" - Fehr & Peers - September 2017.

Air Quality Mitigation Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded by
Fee
West Roseville
Specific Plan
Mitigating
Impacts to
Air Quality
Per DA
$432,985 61,785 10,623 - (60,097)
Zero
Emission
Bus Depot
Project (15,710)
No

6 $445,296
Air Quality Mitigation Fee Project Description
Zero Emission Bus Depot Project (Project# 500305) - This project is for construction of a new 30-space bus parking depot and a new 65-space fleet depot. Both parking areas are designed for zero emission electric charging, including the installation of the first 3 bus chargers (capable of charging up to 9 buses) and the first 5 fleet chargers (capable of charging 10 vehicles). Electrical improvements include infrastructure to accommodate future electrification of all 30 bus spaces and 65 fleet spaces. The depot will increase available fleet parking by 14 spaces, helping address a current parking shortage at the corp yard.

Rancho Cordova
34 | P a g e
DA Fees Imposed Since 2004, continued
Transit Shuttle Service Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded by
Fee
West Roseville
Specific Plan
Shuttle
Service
between
WRSP and
I80/Watt
Ave Light
Rail
Station
Per DA
$543,410 21,980 12,591 - - $577,981
No
Unknown
at this time
Transfer in: From of the Transit Fund to the Transit Shuttle Service Fee to be able to identify revenue and expenditures related to transit shuttle service.

Downtown Benefit Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)*
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded by
Fee
5th Amend. DA
relative to
West Roseville
Specific Plan
Per DA
$6,786,492 330,000 200,340 (611,518) - $6,705,314
No Unknown
at this time
Transfer out: Loan payment of $611,518 to Strategic Improvement Fund. Loan purpose: Funding of a portion of the Oak Street Parking Garage. Interest rate 2.46% (FY25); Loan matures 6/30/28.

This loan will be repaid by Downtown Parking in-Lieu fees collected on an annual basis and the Downtown Fee from collections in Fiddyment Farm Phase 3.

Rancho Cordova
35 | P a g e
DA Fees Imposed Since 2004, continued
Blue Oaks Boulevard Off-Site Road Fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded by
Fee
West Roseville
Specific Plan
Blue Oaks
Blvd.

Project
Per DA
$1,070,936 49,771 21,758 - -
Traffic Signal
and Roadway
Improvements
for Roseville
Soccer
Complex
(582,248)
YesStarted
April 2024

14 $560,217
Westpark Drive off-site road fee
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of CIP
Funded by
Fee
West Roseville
Specific Plan
Westpark
Drive
Extension
Per DA
$162,309 15,051 4,491 - -
Traffic Signal
and Roadway
Improvements
for Roseville
Soccer
Complex
(11,419)
YesStarted
April 2024

2 $170,432
Please refer to the Development Agreements on the City of Roseville’s website: Development Agreements

Rancho Cordova
36 | P a g e
Blue Oaks Blvd. and Westpark Off-Site Road Fee Project Description:

Traffic Signal and Roadway Improvements for Roseville Soccer Complex (Project# 500317) - This project includes the installation of ultimate traffic signal and roadway improvements at the intersections of Blue Oaks Boulevard and Westbrook Boulevard, Blue Oaks Boulevard and Hayden Parkway, Westbrook Boulevard and Brookstone Drive (N), and Westbrook Boulevard and Brookstone Drive (S) to accommodate planned construction of the Roseville Soccer Complex project (400068) east of Westbrook Boulevard. The project will provide left turn lanes off Westbrook Boulevard onto the Roseville Soccer Complex and traffic signal improvements serving the property. The traffic study for the Roseville Soccer Complex project requires these improvements to be complete for the opening of the Soccer Complex.

Annual Development Impact Fee Report
(JPA and SPWA Funds)
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025

City of Rancho Cordova
Table of Contents
Reporting Requirements for Development Impact Fees .........................................................................................................................................1 Description of Development Impact Fees...............................................................................................................................................................2 Fund Balance and Project Descriptions
Sewer Connection Fees ..........................................................................................................................................................................................3 Traffic Mitigation Fees...........................................................................................................................................................................................7 Attachment 1 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................8

City of Rancho Cordova
1 | P a g e
Reporting Requirements for Development Impact Fees
In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of development impact fees (“DIFs”).

This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections (GC §) 66000 through 66008 (“Mitigation Fee Act”). This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989.

GC § 66006(b) states the following requirements as pertains to DIFs:

For each separate account or fund established, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. (B) The amount of the fee.
(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. (D) The amount of the fees collected and interest earned. (E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees. (F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.
(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan. (H) The amount of refunds made (as pursuant to GC § 66001(e)) due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made (as pursuant to GC § 66001(f)) due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.

GC § 65865(e) also requires that any development agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2004, the City shall comply with GC § 66006 with respect to any fee it receives or cost it recovers.

City of Rancho Cordova
2 | P a g e
Description of Development Impact Fees
Sewer Connection Fees
Sewer connection fees are established pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 14.16. Two sewer connection fees are collected when development occurs – a regional sewer connection fee and a local sewer connection fee. The local sewer connection fee is reported in the City of Roseville’s Annual Development Impact Fee Report. Additional fees may be applicable to properties within sewer special benefit assessment areas.
• Regional Sewer Connection Fees - The regional sewer connection fee is charged for each sewer unit required within the Regional Treatment Plan Service Area connected to the city-owned public sewer. The service area includes the City of Roseville and portions of Placer County and South Placer Municipal Utility District.

Traffic Mitigation Fees
In 1988, the City of Roseville adopted a citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee Program, requiring new development within the City to pay traffic impact fees. The fees collected through this program, in addition to other funding sources, allows the City to construct transportation improvements identified in its Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The fee program assesses fair-share costs to other jurisdictions based on their impact on the individual roadways from new development.

This fee applies to all new development in the City. The developers in Specific Plan Areas have built, or will construct, more than the minimum amount of improvements from their funds and will receive a credit for those improvements. Additional fees collected by the City on behalf of regional fee programs:
• Highway 65 Joint Powers Authority Fee Program – The cities of Roseville and Rocklin, along with Placer County, formed a joint powers authority for the purpose of funding four interchanges on Highway 65. The interchanges include Stanford Ranch Road/Galleria Boulevard, Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Blue Oaks Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard. The fee program assesses fair-share costs to each jurisdiction based on their impact on the individual improvements from new development. City of Roseville serves as staff to the JPA and administers the fee program.

City of Rancho Cordova
3 | P a g e
Fund Balance Summary
Sewer Connection Fees
Regional Sewer Connection Fees
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
(As restated)
Fees
Collected(1)
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures(2)
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of
CIP
Funded
by Fee
Roseville
Municipal
Code
Chapters

14.16 Ord.
6100
$202,001,977 35,095,668 7,809,897 - (15,828,711)
Pleasant
Grove UV (1,612,676)
YesStarted
2021
100
PGWWTPEnergy Rec. (109,193)
YesStarted
2019
100
PGWWTPExpansion
2020 (550,930)
YesStarted
2019
100
Dry Creek &
Pleasant
Grove WWTP
Capacity
Evaluation (186,863)
YesStarted
2021
100
Regional
Pump Station
26 and Force
Main
Capacity
Impr. (3,832,880)
YesStarted
2021
100
PGWWTP
Maintenance
Admin and
Shop Building
- SPWA (533,638)
YesStarted
2022
27

City of Rancho Cordova
4 | P a g e
Regional Sewer Connection Fees, continued
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
(As restated)
Fees
Collected(1)
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of
CIP
Funded
by Fee
Dry Creek
WWTP
Capacity
Expansion -
SPWA (382,063)
Yes -
Started
2023 100
PGWWTP
Electrical
Capacity
Expansion
Project -
SPWA (345,697)
Yes -
Started
2023
100
Residential
Equivalent
Dwelling Unit
Evaluation -
SPWA (4,027)
Yes -
Started
2023 100
Corridors
Trunk Sewer
Capacity
Improvement
Project -
SPWA (1,492)
YesStarted
2024
100
DCWWTP
Operations
and
Laboratory
Building
Construction
Project -
SPWA (3,099)
YesStarted
2024
73

City of Rancho Cordova
5 | P a g e
Regional Sewer Connection Fees, continued
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee
Formula
Starting
Balance
(As restated)
Fees
Collected(1)
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of
CIP
Funded
by Fee
Inflation
Reduction
Act Support
Project -
SPWA (12,953)
YesStarted
2024
100
2025
Wastewater
System,
Evaluation
UpdateSPWA (1,320)
YesStarted
2025
100
$221,502,000
Regional Sewer Connection Project Fee Project Descriptions Pleasant Grove UV (Project# 500165) - Due to changes in water quality and regulations, the current Pleasant Grove UV disinfection system is undersized for the projected rated capacity needed after the completion of the Pleasant Grove Expansion Project. This project expands the UV system capacity.

PGWWTP-Energy Recovery (Project# 500166) - Upon completion of the Pleasant Grove Expansion Project, the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant will produce bio-methane from the newly constructed digesters. Absent the Energy Recovery Project, the bio-methane would be burned in a flare, which is not environmentally sound. Once complete, bio-methane produced from the wastewater treatment plant will be conditioned for use in clean air refuse vehicles.

PGWWTP - Expansion 2020 (Project# 500167) - Expand wastewater treatment plant capacity. This project will add primary clarifiers, anaerobic digesters, and solids thickening equipment to the existing PGWWTP treatment process. This will increase the plant's treatment capacity from 9.5 to 12 million gallons per day and is expected to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate growth within the South Placer Wastewater Authority service area through 2035.

City of Rancho Cordova
6 | P a g e
Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove WWTP Capacity Evaluation (Project# 500199) - This project is a field study to confirm the computer model capacity predictions contained in the WW System Evaluation project.

Regional Pump Station 26 and Force Main Capacity Improvement (Project# 500200) - This project will Increase available capacity in the Old Auburn Boulevard trunk sewer and associated lift stations.

PGWWTP Maintenance Admin and Shop Building - SPWA (Project# 500306) - This project funds the design and construction of a new maintenance Building at the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Dry Creek WWTP Capacity Expansion - SPWA (Project# 500420) - This Project will increase treatment capacity of the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) by replacing blowers, adding a new aeration control system, adding mixers in the aeration basins, improving clarifier inlet and baffling, adding a new motor control center and associated electrical improvements to power the new equipment, modifying the existing effluent cooling system, and other associated improvements.

PGWWTP Electrical Capacity Expansion Project - SPWA (Project#500421) - This project will add electrical capacity to the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP). The project includes adding electrical capacity to adequately serve existing, new and planned future loads, building an electrical building to house the new equipment, and adding generator capacity to allow for continued operation during emergencies and power outages to maintain required treatment compliance.

Residential Equivalent Dwelling Unit Evaluation - SPWA (Project# 500422) - Evaluate projected wastewater flows between different residential uses such as age restricted and multi-family developments to determine if a different Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) calculation for these residential uses is warranted in regard to sewer connection fee calculations.

Corridors Trunk Sewer Capacity Improvements Project - SPWA (Project# 500432) - To meet projected build out demands, this project will divert flow from the Cirby Truck Sewer B by making modifications to Pump Station 25 and extending the existing force main. In addition, this project will upsize an existing 15-inch pipe along Coloma Way and reconnect it to the Cirby Truck Sewer.

DCWWTP Operations and Laboratory Building Construction Project - SPWA (Project# 500433) - Per the 2017 DCWWTP Condition Assessment performed on the existing Operations Building, this project is to re-build and expand the Operations and Laboratory Building, update the surrounding site and utilities, and demolish the existing Operations Building.

Inflation Reduction Act Support Project - SPWA (Project# 500434) - Determine if the PGWWTP Expansion and Energy Recovery Projects are eligible for the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and if so, pursue and file for the federal tax credits. 2025 Wastewater System Evaluation Update-SPWA (Project# 500542) - An evaluation of the regional wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities was p Wastewater 2020 System Evaluation Report). The purpose of this update is to evaluate and document future wastewater collection and treatment capacity n document the existing capacity of the regional truck sewer and wastewater treatment facilities, update and evaluate the regional wastewater collection syst improvements. Capital projects will be forecasted as well as system deficiencies identified and documented.

City of Rancho Cordova
7 | P a g e
Traffic Mitigation Fees
Highway 65 Joint Powers Authority Fee Program
Document
Establishing
Fee
Project Fee Formula
Starting
Balance
Fees
Collected
(Refunded)
Interest
Earned
Interfund
Transfer
In/(Out)
Expenditures
Ending
Balance as of
June 30, 2025
Sufficient
Funds to
Complete
Project?
% of
CIP
Funded
by Fee
Resolution
No. 90-312
Highway
65-
Galleria/
Stanford
Joint Powers
Agreement
Oct, 15,
1990;
Amended
Aug. 18,
1992 ($4,506,335) 1,753,205 10,003 - (4,009) ($2,747,136) No 100 The Highway 65 Joint Powers Authority Board approved a plan for funding the construction of various Highway 65 Interchange Projects that included the commitment of funds from the Authority along with funds from the Cities of Roseville and Rocklin and the County of Placer. The participants remitted funds to the Authority in advance of the construction. In addition, the City of Roseville constructed projects using City of Roseville funds. The projects were dedicated to the Authority through a reimbursement agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, the cities and the County will be reimbursed through future traffic mitigation fees collected by the Authority.

Traffic Mitigation Fee Project Descriptions
Highway 65-Galleria/Stanford (Project# 400060) –The proposed project would modify the SR 65 NB ramps at the Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road interchange as well as reconfigure the lanes along Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road. The project would construct the following:
• Dual left turn lanes onto the NB SR 65 slip on-ramp.
• Protected median left turn pockets at the NB and SB ramp intersections, eliminating the inside trap lanes. • Right turn pocket for the SB approach along Stanford Ranch Road to the NB slip on-ramp. • Widened NB SR 65 to NB Stanford Ranch Road slip off-ramp from one to two lanes at the ramp terminus. Off-ramp will include a signalized intersection at Stanford Ranch Road.
• Widened NB slip on-ramp to two metered general-purpose lanes plus an HOV preferential lane. • Modified terminus of the NB loop off-ramp to reduce speeds and enhance safety for all modes utilizing the facility.

7| P a g e
Attachment 1:

Fee Ordinances, Resolutions and
Agreements

Sewer Connection Fees:

Regional Sewer Connection Fees
Ordinance No. 6100

Traffic Mitigation Fees
Highway 65 Joint Powers Authority Fee Program
Joint Powers Agreement
October 15, 1990
As Amended August 18, 1992

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 1/21/2026
Item #: VIII.29
File #: 0704-01
Item ID: 2026-12
Title: Park Naming Policy Review
Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends Council review of the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department’s Park Naming Policy, and requests direction for revision if desired.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council review the current Park Naming Policy and provide direction for revision.

BACKGROUND
New park sites are referenced by parcel until they enter the construction phase, at which time the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department (PRL) strives to have a name for the park. The process for park naming is guided by the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Park Naming Policy, which is approved by Council. This policy has undergone several revisions over the years, with the most recent revision occurring five years ago, in 2021.

The act of naming a park is significant and meaningful. Currently, the Park Naming Policy allows for parks to be named after prominent geographical locations and/or features, features of the park or facility, recognition of historical or cultural significance in the area, and/or significant individuals within the community. Each year during the park naming submission period (the month of July), PRL receives dozens of name recommendations. A Park Naming Subcommittee (with membership as defined in the Park Naming Policy) reviews all submissions and makes its recommendations to the Parks & Recreation Commission. The Commission in turn makes its recommendations to the City Council, who approves the final park names.

To ensure that the Park Naming Policy remains aligned with Council priorities, staff is seeking direction from Council for any desired revisions.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact resulting from park naming is the fabrication and installation of monument signs to identify the park / park name. This expense is typically included in the capital development costs of a new park, so there is no General Fund impact as a result of the City Council’s policy direction.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The review of the Park Naming Policy meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional

environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning and Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Park Naming History

2. Park Naming Policy
REVIEWERS:

Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 1/9/2026 Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 1/9/2026 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 1/9/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/12/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/12/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/13/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 1/13/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 1/13/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 1/14/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 1/14/2026

PARKS NAMED FOR PEOPLE 62% PARKS NAMED PER OTHER CRITERIA 38% 1907-1990 (5) 56% 1907-1990 (4) 44%

1. Ferretti Park 1907 1. Crestmont Park 1968

2. Woodbridge Park 1934 2. Saugstad Park 1975

3. Royer Park 1935 3. Eastwood Park 1979

4. Weber Park 1937 4. Lincoln Estates Park 1982

5. Garbolino Park 1948
1990-1999 (9) 43% 1990-1999 (12) 57%

6. Cresthaven Park 1993 5. Maidu Regional Park 1990

7. Buljan Park 1994 6. Silverado Oaks Park 1991

8. Wanish Park 1994 7. Diamond Oaks Park 1992

9. Mahany Park 1995 8. Kaseberg Park 1992

10. Vencil Brown Park 1997 9. Hillsborough Park 1993

11. Dietrich Park 1998 10. Olympus Park 1994

12. White Park 1998 11. Olympus Pointe Sculpture Park 1995

13. Doyle Park 1999 12. Marco Dog Park 1996

14. Elliott Park 1999 13. Misty Wood Park 1996

14. Summerhill Park 1999

15. Twinwood Park 1999

16. Veteran's Memorial Park 1999
2000-2009 (19) 76% 2000-2004 (6) 24%

15. Nelson Park 2000 17. Kenwood Oaks Park 2000

16. Adam V. Baquera Park 2001 18. Cambria Park 2002

17. Hall Park 2001 19. Veterans Memorial Park- North 2005

18. Lockridge Park 2002 20. Bear Dog Park 2006

19. Taylor Park 2002 21. Blue Oaks Park 2006

20. Davis Park 2004 22. Central Park 2009

21. Stephenson Park 2004

22. Besana Park 2005

23. Erven Park 2005

24. Santucci Park 2005

25. Uribe Park 2005

26. Dugan Park 2006

27. Burner Park 2007

28. Hughes Park 2007

29. Piches Park 2007

30. Pineschi Park 2007

31. Goto Park 2008

32. Hamel Park 2008

33. Lunardi Park 2008
2010-2019 (16) 89% 2010-2019 (2) 11%

34. Festersen Park 2011 23. Vernon Street Town Square 2013

35. Fratis Park 2011 24. Sierra Crossing Park 2019

36. Harrigan Greens 2011

37. Nichols Park 2011

38. Heredia Park 2012

39. Crabb Park 2013

40. Duran Park 2014

41. Mahan Park 2014

42. Rickey Park 2014

43. Fiddyment Park 2017

44. Waltrip Park 2017

45. Kennedy Park 2018

46. Stizzo Park 2018

47. Astill Family Park 2019

48. Bos Park 2019

49. Luken Park At The Village Center 2019
2020-2026 (9) 43% 2020-2026 (12) 57%

50. Phillips Park 2020 25. Pistachio Park 2020

51. Roccucci Park 2020 26. Four Corners Park 2022

52. Gray Park 2021 27. North Hayden Park 2022

53. Sullivan Park 2021 28. Apollo Dog Park 2023

54. Sakamoto Park 2022 29. Campus Oaks Park 2024

55. Huisking Park 2023 30. Gibson Park 2024

56. Denio Family Park 2025 31. Solaire Park 2024

57. John Byouk Park 2025 32. Crimson Ridge Park 2025

58. Rockholm Park 2026 33. Placer Valley Soccer Complex 2025

34. Riego Creek Park 2025

35. Lower Bank Park 2026

36. Silver Spruce Park 2026

9.1.1 1
City of Roseville – Parks, Recreation & Libraries
Department Policies & Procedures
APPROVED: Number: 9.1.1
Effective Date: 06/16/2021
Jill Geller, Director
Last Reviewed Date: 11/19/2025
Subject: Park Naming
Purpose
The City of Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) has established a policy that provides a process and parameters for the solicitation of names and the approval of recommended name suggestions for parks and PRL facilities. This process was approved by City Council on 06/16/2021.

Policy
It is the policy of PRL to annually, as applicable, seek name suggestions from the community for new parks and PRL facilities.

Definition
“PRL facilities” are defined as recreation facilities, rooms within PRL buildings, and amenities within parks including, but not limited to, sports fields, groves of trees, walkways and trails.

There is a separate naming process for City buildings and other City facilities.

Process
In July of each year, notification is made to the public and interested individuals that name suggestions are being sought for new parks and facilities that will be under construction during that fiscal year period (July 1 to June 30). This suggestion period is open for the month of July. Names should be submitted to the City Clerk and forwarded to the Park Planning and Development Manager.

At the conclusion of the suggestion period, the names received will be considered as follows:
1) The Park Naming Subcommittee shall review the list and make recommendations for park and/or facility names, using the criteria outlined below, to the Parks & Recreation Commission. The Park Naming Subcommittee shall consist of the following staff:
a. PRL Director
b. Park Planning and Development Manager
c. Sr. Park Development Project Manager or Park Development Project Manager (one representative serving a two-year term, to be rotated) d. PRL Superintendent from the Parks Division (one representative serving a two-year term, to be rotated among PRL Superintendents from the Parks Division)

9.1.1 2
e. PRL staff member chosen “at-large”, who shall serve a two-yearterm f. Staff member from the Development Services Department (one representative serving a two-year term, to be rotated among Development Servicesstaff)
Two-year terms shall be staggered to provide continuity in the rotational representation. 2) Names received shall be considered “active” for both the current and following fiscal years, and will be considered for those parks and facilities scheduled for construction during those same fiscal years.
3) A name suggestion cannot be submitted for more than three consecutive years. 4) The Park Naming Subcommittee maintains the right to select a name not included on the “active” list, due to special circumstances such as historical significance, the passing of an active contributor(s) to the community, or other considerations.

Criteria for Naming a Park Facility
The act of naming is significant and meaningful. A name can invoke powerful emotions, create images and help to recall history. The naming of a park or facility is intended to be a permanent act, and therefore should be approached in a thoughtful manner. The name of a park or facility may take into consideration the past, present and future history of the land, its use, and our relationship to it. The following criteria and factors shall be considered when naming or renaming a park or facility:
• Recognition of nearby prominent geographical locations (e.g., street names, subdivision names, or adjacent school names)
• Recognition of significant natural and geological features of the area • Recognition of outstanding features of the park or facility • Recognition of historical or cultural significance in the area • Recognition of significant individuals within the community, as follows:
o The person contributed a significant amount of land orfunding for the park or facility (typically amounting to 50% or more of development costs). o The person has made significant volunteer contributions to the Roseville community and its residents’ quality of life. o The person is deceased and is being recognized for substantial volunteer contributions to the quality of life in Roseville.
o The person died in the line of duty as part of City service.

Naming of new parks or facilities should also consider:
• Including “Roseville” for regional or citywide parks andfacilities • Avoiding duplication of names in order to ease confusion of sites and locations for the general public
The Subcommittee reserves the right to consider exceptions due to extraordinary circumstances, which inspire vision and civic engagement. Exceptions can be made when the actions or contributions of an individual not normally meeting the established criteria are so significant and profound that this person deserves consideration.

9.1.1 3
It is noted that the City of Roseville is grateful for the sacrifices of our fallen soldiers and veterans who served our country. With limited parks and facilities available, it is difficult to place a higher value or honor of one life over another. Therefore, honoring our fallen soldiers and veterans shall be directed to existing veteran-related programs within the City.

Re-naming of an existing park or facility, due to costs, potential loss of neighborhood identity and other considerations, shall be discouraged. The City Council reserves the right to add to the name of an existing park not named after a person or family, due to special circumstances. In such cases, the original park name shall not be replaced. Under these special circumstances, community contributions towards the offset of costs incurred to change signage shall be considered in the approvalprocess.

Name Selection Process
1) The Subcommittee shall review all names and recommend up to three names for each new park or facility to the Parks & Recreation Commission.
2) The recommended names, along with the full list of submissions (including the “active” names from the previous year), shall be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration at a formal meeting. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall recommend up to three names for each new park or facility to the City Council. 3) The recommended names, along with the full list of submissions (including the “active” names from the previous year), shall be reviewed by the City Council for approval at a formal meeting.
4) Family members of any potential namesakes shall be contacted by PRL staff prior to final approval by City Council, to ensure their support of the recommendation. 5) The Annual Park Naming Process shall conclude upon City Council’s final approval of the park or facility name.