Roseville City Council
June 3, 2026

Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
roseville.ca.gov

The City of Roseville welcomes your participation.

Meeting Schedule: Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.

Two Public Comment Periods for Non-Agenda Items: A total of twenty-five (25) minutes is allotted for public comments. At the beginning and end of the meeting, each speaker has three (3) minutes to address the Mayor/Chair on issues that are not listed on the agenda and are within the City’s jurisdiction. Please submit a yellow speaker card to the City Clerk before the item is heard if you wish to make a comment. You will still have an opportunity to comment if you haven’t filled out a yellow speaker card.

Brown Act: The City Council cannot discuss or act on items not listed on the agenda. Public Comment on Agenda Items: Each speaker has five (5) minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.

Levine Act Provisions: If you’ve made a campaign contribution totaling more than $500 ($250 prior to January 1, 2025) to City Council Members in the last twelve (12) months, you must disclose it before addressing an item on the agenda. Please visit Levine Act – City of Roseville for updated forms and information.

Audio/Visual Presentations: If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk for consideration at least 72 hours in advance.

Americans with Disabilities Act: If special assistance is required to participate in a meeting, including the need of auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City Clerk at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. City Clerk 311 Vernon Street [email protected] 916-774-5263 TDD: 916-774-5220

Security Measures: All meeting attendees must successfully pass through a security metal detector. Any person with a prohibited item will not be allowed entry. Prohibited items include but are not limited to firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs, and alcohol.

Viewing Options: The City of Roseville provides three options for viewing meetings:

Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
AGENDA
City Council / Housing Authority Meeting
June 3, 2026
6:00 PM
Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

VI. CONSENT CALENDAR

1. Water Meters and Related Parts - Sole Source Purchase Order (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES

DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source purchase order with Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua Metric Sales Company for Sensus water meters and related parts for $950,000 in FY2026-27. In addition, staff requests this purchase order be renewed annually as follows, subject to budget approval: FY2027-28 estimated at $980,000; FY2028-29 estimated at $1,010,000; and FY2029-30 estimated at $1,045,000, for an estimated total amount of $3,985.000. Funding for meter purchases comes from the Water Operations Fund, Water Rehabilitation Fund, and the Recycled Water operating budget in the Wastewater Operations Fund.

CONTACT: Robert Strebel 916-746-1717 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Approve Resolution No. 26-171 approving a sole source purchase order for water meters and related parts.

2. Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement Project - Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT - TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment to fund the Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement Project. The estimated cost of this project is $2,510,740. These costs include procurement, installation, contingencies, and staff time. The project will be fully funded with SB125 funds provided by the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA). Both revenue and expenditure budgets in the Transit Fund will be increased accordingly. This adjustment will have no impact on the General Fund.

CONTACT: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7075 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

3. Fiscal Year 2025-26 Transportation Development Act Claims (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -

TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claims in the amount of $12,910,937 and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City.

CONTACT: Kimberly Goulet 916-746-1320 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Approve Resolution No. 26-170 approving and authorizing execution of the 2024/25 Transportation Development Act claims to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute them on behalf of the City.

4. Zero Emission Bus Depot Project (Phase 2 and 3) - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zero Emission Bus Depot Project (Phase 2 and 3) Contract Purchase Agreement to include the Federal Transit Administration's 2026 Federal Clauses. Approval of this amendment will allow staff to continue to use federal dollars to help pay for the Zero Emission Bus Depot Project.

CONTACT: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-173 approving amendment 1 to contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Vasko Electric Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

5. Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 - Grant Authorization (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -

TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends adoption of a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit a grant application to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments 2026 Federal Funding Program under the Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program, and to execute all related grant documents and comply with timely project delivery requirements. The grant application would support the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 multi-use bike trail project.

CONTACT: Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-175 authorizing applications for grant funding from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Programs; authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit City of Roseville SACOG 2026 Federal Funding Program application priorities; and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute all grant documents and timely project delivery requirements.

6. Disposal and Auction Services - Contract Purchase Agreement (FINANCE DEPARTMENT -

PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with J.J. Kane Associates, Inc., dba JJ Kane Auctions, on an as-needed basis utilizing Sourcewell Contract #111424-JJK. The Fleet and Purchasing/Central Stores Divisions require auction services to liquidate retired vehicles, equipment and other surplus goods that are no longer required by the City. This is a revenue-generating agreement, with the service costs paid by successful bidders.

Revenue generated from the agreement is estimated at approximately $500,000 annually. Staff also requests authorization to renew the agreement three times without further City Council approval, contingent upon staff's determination that continued use of the service is in the City's best interest.

CONTACT: Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-172 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and J.J. Kane Associates, Inc. dba JJ Kane Auctions, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

7. 2090 Hilltop Backup Generator Replacement (RFQ 10-3444) – Contract Purchase Agreement (FINANCE DEPARTMENT - PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Elite Power, Inc. as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Request for Quotations No.10-3444 2090 Hilltop Backup Generator Replacement. The cost of the Agreement is $107,908. Additionally, adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the contract purchase agreement and

authorizing the Public Works Director or designee to approve change order requests for this project up to 10% ($10,790) as a construction contingency, for a grand total of $118,698.

Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget.

CONTACT: Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-174 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Elite Power, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

8. Reservation of Affordable Housing Funds for Development of the Westpark Affordable Apartments (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval to reserve affordable housing funds for a proposed affordable housing project in Roseville. The request is to reserve $1,775,000 from the City's Low and Moderate Income Asset Fund (Low/Mod) for construction of St. Anton's affordable housing project, Westpark Affordable Apartments. The Low/Mod funds being considered for this loan originated from the repayment of a prior affordable housing loan and are being proposed to support a new affordable housing activity. No General Fund resources will be used.

CONTACT: Trisha Isom 916-746-1239 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-176 authorizing reservation of Affordable Housing Funds for development of the Westpark Affordable Apartments Project.

9. HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD/CITY COUNCIL - Quarterly Update 1st Quarter 2026 (ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, receive a quarterly report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program. This report is for informational purposes only and has no impact on the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Suzi Cook-Turner, Trisha Isom 916-774-5414, 916-746-1239 smcook- [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. This quarterly report is for informational purposes only and requires no City Council action.

10. State Legislative and Regulatory Representation Consulting - Professional Services Agreement (PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff requests approval of a professional services agreement with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son for State Legislative and Regulatory Representation Consulting Services to provide state legislative and regulatory representation consulting services related to legislative advocacy,

regulatory monitoring, policy analysis, and strategic government relations support. Following the completion of the competitive procurement process, staff recommends awarding a professional services agreement to Joe A. Gonsalves & Son to continue providing these services to the City of Roseville. The initial one-year agreement includes a monthly retainer of $9,000, for a total annual not-to-exceed amount of $108,000. While the agreement includes the option for up to four additional one-year renewals, each renewal would be subject to annual budget approval and a determination that continuation of the services remains in the best interest of the City. Based on the proposed rate structure for the initial agreement term and all potential renewal terms, the cumulative not-to-exceed amount over the possible five-year period is $600,000. Funding for the proposed agreement is included in the Public Affairs and Communications Department General Fund budget and is incorporated into the proposed FY 2026-27 budget.

CONTACT: Rob Baquera 916-746-1170 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-177 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

11. Appointments - City Council Auxiliary Positions (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT) Summary: It is recommended that the City Council approve the appointment of Vice Mayor Alvord as an alternate to the Sites Reservoir Project Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors.

CONTACT: Helen Dreyer [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Approve the appointment of Vice Mayor Alvord as an alternate to the Sites Reservoir Project Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS

12. Park Naming Recommendations (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK

DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution to approve park name recommendations for four new parks. Funding for the new park identification signs is included as a part of each capital project.

CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Approve Resolution No. 26-169 approving park name recommendations.

13. Impound Fee for Out-of-Class Electric Bicycles & Pocket Bikes (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends adopting an electric bicycle and pocket bike impound fee in the amount of $250 pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22651.08 and to incorporate such fee into the City's most current master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees. There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed action.

CONTACT: Courtney Scurria 916-746-1051 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-167 adopting impound fee for out-of-class electric bicycles and pocket bikes and incorporating the fee into the schedule of User and Regulatory Fees.

14. Senate Bill 707 - Administrative Standards Update (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of updates to the City Council/Boards, Commissions, & Committees Administrative Standards, the City’s public meeting procedures. Senate Bill 707 (SB 707), portions of which went into effect on January 1, 2026, and other portions which go into effect on July 1, 2026, implements the most extensive revisions to the Brown Act in decades.

The revisions were designed to strengthen public participation by requiring certain city councils, such as Roseville, to offer public remote access to public meetings via telephonic or audiovisual platforms. The proposed updates to the Administrative Standards include not only the necessary changes required by SB 707, but some additional revisions identified by staff due to changes in the law, to add clarity, and to address areas currently not addressed in the procedures. There will be a minor fiscal impact to the General Fund related to offering remote public participation.

CONTACT: Michelle Sheidenberger 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-168 approving the City Council/Boards, Commissions, and Committees Administrative Standards updates.

VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing

2. Presentation by staff

3. Presentation by applicant or appellant

4. Accept public testimony

5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period

6. Close the Public Hearing

7. City Council comments and questions

8. City Council action

Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.

Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.

15. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Landscaping and Lighting District Assessments - Amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the engineer's annual levy reports for fiscal year 2026- 27 and ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the described Landscaping and Lighting Districts (individually "LLD collectively "LLDs"). These LLDs were formed within the City to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of public improvements pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, Sections 22500, et seq., and Article XIII D of the California Constitution. All charges are needed to fund landscape services in each LLD. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-178 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-179 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

c. Adopt Resolution No. 26-180 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

d. Adopt Resolution No. 26-181 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

e. Adopt Resolution No, 26-182 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

f. Adopt Resolution No. 26-183 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

g. Adopt Resolution No. 26-184 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

h. Adopt Resolution No. 26-185 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

i. Adopt Resolution No. 26-186 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

j. Adopt Resolution No. 26-187 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

k. Adopt Resolution No. 26-188 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

l. Adopt Resolution No. 26-189 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

m. Adopt Resolution No. 26-190 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

n. Adopt Resolution No. 26-191 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

o. Adopt Resolution No. 26-192 amending and/or approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

p. Adopt Resolution No. 26-193 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

IX. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

X. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
XI. ADJOURNMENT

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.1
File #: 0203-09
Item ID: 2026-270

Title: Water Meters and Related Parts - Sole Source Purchase Order Contact: Robert Strebel 916-746-1717 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a sole source purchase order with Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua Metric Sales Company for Sensus water meters and related parts for $950,000 in FY2026-27. In addition, staff requests this purchase order be renewed annually as follows, subject to budget approval: FY2027-28 estimated at $980,000; FY2028-29 estimated at $1,010,000; and FY2029-30 estimated at $1,045,000, for an estimated total amount of $3,985.000. Funding for meter purchases comes from the Water Operations Fund, Water Rehabilitation Fund, and the Recycled Water operating budget in the Wastewater Operations Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Sole Source Purchase Order with Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua Metric Sales Company for Sensus water meters and related parts for $950,000 in FY2026-27, and further authorize three (3) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
There are approximately 56,000 meters in the City's water distribution system. The Environmental Utilities Department (EU) uses Sensus water meters for all domestic, commercial, and irrigation consumption. This decision originated with a sole-source justification approved by City Council in 1990. Staff recommends continuing this product line because Sensus meters have proven reliable over the last 31 years and costs related to staff training, labor, and materials will be predictable and minimized. EU's water utility regularly reviews other manufacturers, but trials have resulted in unacceptable failure rates and potential issues related to unproven technology. The only authorized local representative for Sensus meters is Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua-Metric Sales Company, who provides excellent customer service and works closely with EU's water utility staff on all orders, including delivering critical products on short notice in emergency situations.

FISCAL IMPACT
For FY2026-27, funding for the purchase of new Sensus water meters ($300,000) through Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua-Metric Sales Company will be from appropriations in the Water Operations Fund and reimbursed via meter sales to new development resulting in no change to the available resources in that fund. Funding for the portion of the new meters slated to replace existing malfunctioning meters and those no longer supported by the manufacturer ($650,000) will be as follows: $600,000 from appropriations in the Water Rehabilitation Fund (a reduction in that fund's available resources); and $50,000 from appropriations in the Recycled Water operating budget in the Wastewater Operations Fund (a reduction to that fund's available resources). Spending for future purchase order renewals will be contingent upon

annual City Council budget approvals. Future year purchase orders are estimated at: FY2027-28 $980,000; FY2028-29 $1,010,000; and FY2029-30 $1,045,000, for a total estimated amount of $3,985,000.

The table below shows the spending plan for these meters through FY2029-2030:

FY2026-27 FY2027-28 FY2028-29 FY2029-30
Water Operations Fund
(to be reimbursed by meter sales to
new development)
$300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
Water Rehabilitation Fund $600,000 $630,000

$660,000 $695,000
Wastewater Operations Fund
(Recycled Water operating budget)
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Total Estimated
$950,000
Estimated
$980,000
Estimated
$1,010,000
Estimated
$1,045,000

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. A purchase order meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Robert Strebel, Water Distribution Superintendent

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-171

REVIEWERS:

Pamela Walsh, Environmental Utilities Department Created/Initiated - 4/29/2026 Robert Strebel, Environmental Utilities Department - Water Approved - 4/29/2026 George Hanson, Environmental Utilities Department - Water Approved - 5/5/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 5/12/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 5/12/2026

Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-171

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER FOR WATER METERS AND

RELATED PARTS

WHEREAS, a sole source purchase order for water meters and related parts, by and between the City of Roseville and Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua-Metric Sales Company, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve an additional three (3) one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.2
File #: 0721 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-342

Title: Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement Project - Budget Adjustment Contact: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment to fund the Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement Project. The estimated cost of this project is $2,510,740. These costs include procurement, installation, contingencies, and staff time. The project will be fully funded with SB125 funds provided by the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA). Both revenue and expenditure budgets in the Transit Fund will be increased accordingly. This adjustment will have no impact on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $2,510,740 for the Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND
The Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement Project consists of the installation of a pantograph-style overhead bus charging system capable of rapidly recharging a full-sized fixed route bus while on-route.

This project will also include the installation of a Level 3 plug-in charger to support vehicles not capable of accepting an overhead charge. The Louis/Orlando transfer point is serviced by Roseville Transit, Placer County Transit, and Sacramento Regional Transit District and is located at the corner of Louis Ln and Orlando Ave. This charger will serve Roseville and its regional partners to keep buses sufficiently charged and in operation throughout the length of a service day.

On May 21, 2025, the Roseville City Council approved a program funding and reimbursement agreement with the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) to fully fund the Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement project. This project was determined to be a valuable regional asset and was funded through the SB125 funding cycle to fund eligible emissions-reducing infrastructure projects. This agenda item is requesting that Council allocate the funding previously received to the project budget. This funding does not require a local match for design or construction and will not have an impact on Roseville's Local Transportation Funds or the General Fund.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Louis/Orlando Bus Charging Improvement project will be fully funded with SB125 funds provided by CalSTA. Both revenue and expenditure budgets in the Transit Fund will be increased accordingly. This adjustment will have no impact on the General Fund. This is considered a regional project that will benefit transit agencies that utilize the Louis Orlando transfer station. There are no local match requirements for the use of these funds. Any additional costs that exceed the allocated SB125 funds will be secured from regional funding sources through coordination with PCTPA and Placer County Transit.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Budget Adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Planner

Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7075

2. Project 700087 Exhibit A_SB125 Approval Letter from CalSTA_Received on 7-8-24

3. Project 700087 Exhibit B_SB 125 Funding Administration and Distribution Guidelines for PCTPA_Adopted Oct2024

4. LOTC Map

REVIEWERS:

Zachary Presley, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 4/27/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 4/27/2026 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 4/30/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/12/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

ORDINANCE NO. 7075

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Louis Orlando Bus Charging Improvement project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 11/19/2025

Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT

FISCAL YEAR:

ORDINANCE:

ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION

6511

6587

84001

700087

2,510,740

Establish Capital Outlay - CIP Projects budget for the
Louis Orlando Bus Charging Improvements project.

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 2,510,740

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION

6511

4410

84001

700087

2,510,740

Establish State Grants revenue budget for the Louis
Orlando Bus Charging Improvements project.

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL 2,510,740

NET ADJUSTMENT -

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000

FUND BALANCE TOTAL -

Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Louis Orlando Bus Charging Improvements Project (700087), and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $2,510,740 in the Transit Fund (6511) to the project.

The City of Roseville received an allocation of $2,510,740 in state revenues from the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP). This Budget Adjustment will provide funding for the design and construction costs associated with the bus charging improvements at the Louis Orlando Transfer Center. 2025-26
Ed Scofield, Alt. Transportation Manager
Zachary Presley, Transportation Planner
Public Works / Alternative Transportation

Gavin Newsom
Governor

Toks Omishakin
Secretary

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2340
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-323-5400
www.calsta.ca.gov

California Transportation Commission  Board of Pilot Commissioners  California Highway Patrol  Department of Motor Vehicles Department of Transportation  High Speed Rail Authority  Office of Traffic Safety  New Motor Vehicle Board

July 8, 2024

Mr. Matt Click
Executive Director
Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA)
299 Nevada Street
Auburn, CA 95603

Dear Mr. Click:

In December 2023 PCTPA requested an allocation of $37,851,991 across all fiscal years to support the project listed below. This allocation includes a maximum request of $378,520 (ZETCP PTA) for administrative costs.

1. Sacramento to Roseville Third Main Track Phase 1 (existing TIRCP project and expanded scope): Uses $10,000,000 of TIRCP funds to support completion of this existing project.

2. Electric Charging Infrastructure (new TIRCP project): Uses $2,510,740 of TIRCP funds for this new project. Elements include construction of two new electric overhead charging stations at the Roseville Transit Galleria Mall and at the Louis Lane & Orlando Avenue Transit Center in Roseville, CA.

3. Electric Bus and Van Purchases (new TIRCP project): Uses $3,354,086 of TIRCP funds and $4,730,057 of ZETCP funds across all fiscal years to support this new project. Project includes purchasing twelve 40-foot electric buses to support interregional commuter services, nine 35-foot electric buses for use on local route services, and twelve electric vans to support on-demand microtransit services.

4. Electric Van Purchase (new TIRCP project): Uses $400,000 of TIRCP funds to purchase two electric transit vans to support increased demand on existing microtransit services.

5. City Corporation Yard EV Charging Infrastructure Upgrades (new TIRCP project):

Uses $600,000 of TIRCP funds across all fiscal years to support this new project.

Project includes the design and construction of charging infrastructure at this transit yard, which is operated by Auburn Transit.

6. Roseville Transit Bus Shelter Replacement (new TIRCP project): Uses $1,116,250 of future year TIRCP for this new project. Includes removal of substandard shelters and installation of new shelters. Shelter replacement will be prioritized by their existing condition and proximity to disadvantaged communities.

7. Nevada Street Station Electric Charging Infrastructure (new TIRCP project): Uses $1,610,740 of future year TIRCP for this new project. Includes the design and construction of bus charging infrastructure at this transit station located in Auburn.

July 8, 2024

8. Capital Bus Purchase and ZEB Charging Infrastructure Improvements (new TIRCP project): Uses $13,162,598 of future year TIRCP for this new project. Elements include purchasing four cut-away buses to replace and expand vehicles of the existing fleet being used for microtransit services. Also includes purchasing eight new buses to be used on fixed-route services as well as installation of charging infrastructure.

CalSTA has reviewed for completeness the allocation request, including the required data and technical submissions and the proposed project. It has been determined the submission package meets the minimum program requirements and I am pleased to notify you that the allocation request has been approved. CalSTA will continue working with PCTPA and partner state agencies to analyze and validate the technical submissions prior to future disbursements.

CalSTA will disburse $16,356,936 of TIRCP funds (100% General Fund) and $1,900,006 of ZETCP funds ($1,019,543.22 GGRF + $880,462.78 PTA) for a cumulative total of $18,256,942. A total amount of $16,397,478 of TIRCP and $3,197,571 of ZETCP remains available to PCTPA in future fiscal years. This funding will be disbursed in future allocation actions.

CalSTA will modify the SB 125 Program Guidelines no later than September 30, 2024, for the distribution of funds for the 2024-25 fiscal year, which may include updated fund totals available to PCTPA per year across all fiscal years that were impacted as part of the 2024 final budget agreement.

PCTPA is responsible for tracking the receipt and utilization of these funds separately, and recording interest earned (or other investment income earned) on each fund source separately. The interest or investment earnings must also be spent on approved eligible projects within each program and will be accounted for when PCTPA submits its required Annual Report.

Please expect additional correspondence from CalSTA to verify PCTPA‘s proper account information prior to the completion of the transfer of funds.

If you have any questions, please contact CalSTA Chief Deputy Secretary Chad Edison at 916-247-0322.

Sincerely,

TOKS OMISHAKIN
Secretary

PCTPA’s Guidelines for the Administration and Distribution of SB125 Program Funds Adopted by the PCTPA Board of Directors on October 23, 2024

Background
In July of 2023, the State of California passed Senate Bill 125 (SB 125), which established a one-time funding allocation of $37,851,991 to Placer County for distribution to agencies with eligible zero- emission vehicle (ZEV) and infrastructure projects under the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and newly formed Zero Emission Transit Capital Program (ZETCP). In December of 2023, the PCTPA Board of Directors directed PCTPA staff to coordinate with the region’s transit operators to administer the SB 125 program funding and submit all the necessary documentation to claim the region’s funding allocation from the California Stat e Transportation Agency (CalSTA).

PCTPA staff subsequently submitted a funding allocation claim package to CalSTA by December 31, 2023, which apportioned the region’s allocation to the following project sponsors/agencies for delivery of their respective projects shown, below, in Table 1.

Table 1: Apportionment of SB 125 Funding Allocation for Placer County Project Project
Sponsor/Agency
SB 125 Funding Amount
(Program Source)
PCTPA Administration
(1% of SB 125 funding allocation)
Placer County
Transportation
Planning Agency
$378,520
(ZETCP PTA)
Sacramento to Roseville Third Main Track Phase 1 Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority
$10,000,000
(TIRCP)
Electric Charging Infrastructure for Roseville Transit
and the South Placer Transit Service at the Galleria
Mall and the Louis Lane & Orlando Avenue Transit
Center
City of Roseville $2,510,740
(TIRCP)
Electric Bus and Van Purchases for the Roseville
Transit and Arrow Services City of Roseville $3,354,086 (TIRCP) + $4,719,057 (ZETCP)
Electric Van Purchases for the Auburn OnDemand
Service City of Auburn $400,000
(TIRCP)
Auburn City Corporation Yard Electric Vehicle
Charging Infrastructure Upgrades City of Auburn $600,000 (TIRCP)
Roseville Transit Bus Shelter Replacement City of Roseville $1,116,250 (TIRCP) Nevada Street Station Electric Charging
Infrastructure City of Auburn $1,610,740 (TIRCP)
Capital Bus Purchase and Zero Emission Bus
Charging Infrastructure Improvements County of Placer $13,162,598 TOTAL: $37,851,991

In July 2024, CalSTA notified PCTPA staff that the allocation funding request package was determined to be complete and that the funding requested has been approved for disbursement to PCTPA (refer to Attachment 1 containing the CalSTA determination for PCTPA’s SB 125 funding allocation request).

In preparation of receiving the SB 125 funds, PCTPA staff met with the region’s three transit operators (i.e., Auburn Transit, Placer County Transit, and Roseville Transit) on August 8, 2024, to discuss how the funding would be distributed once received.

PCTPA’s Guidelines for the Administration and Distribution of SB125 Program Funds Adopted by the PCTPA Board of Directors on October 23, 2024

Administration and Distribution of SB 125 Funding
The following guidelines memorialize the agreed upon methodology that PCTPA will use to administer and distribute the SB 125 program funding. All a gencies receiving the funding are subject to compliance with CalSTA’s established Budget Act of 2023 SB 125 Formula -Based Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program & Zero Emission Capital Program Final Guidelines, September 29, 2023 (SB 125 Guidelines).

Maintaining an SB 125 Account and Tracking Funding Received Per the SB 125 Guidelines, PCTPA has created a dedicated account to maintain all SB 125 program funds received. Interest earned on the SB 125 funds will be tracked by PCTPA and can be distributed to eligible SB 125 projects at the discretion of PCTPA, in coordination with the region’s eligible agencies that can receive funding. PCTPA staff shall provide a summary of the SB 125 account’s fund balance and interest earned to the PCTPA Board of Directors annually, or upon request by PCTPA’s member agencies and/or project sponsors/agencies.

Distribution of SB 125 Funds
PCTPA will distribute SB 125 funding to project sponsors/agencies on a first-come, first-served basis, per the SB 125 funding amount s identified in Table 1 . To receive SB 125 funds, project sponsors/agencies must submit proof of expenditure to PCTPA identifying how the project expenses have been either accrued or paid by the agency for the eligible project. PCTPA will then release SB 125 funding to the agency up to the amount approved as part of the CalSTA allocation request package (or any other subsequent amendment thereto) . On a case -by-case basis, i f a project sponsor/agency requires SB 125 funding for a project prior to accruing its expenses, PCTPA may release funding upon proof that the project sponsor/agency is committed to expending the funds expeditiously as intended in the CalSTA allocation request package (i.e., a purchase order and/or other funding expenditure commitment document is provided).

In collaboration with the project sponsors/agencies receiving SB 125 funding, a funding distribution schedule has been prepared to help PCTPA staff determine the readiness of projects able to expend and receive SB 125 funding (refer to Attachment 2). This schedule will be used to guide the distribution of available SB 125 funds to project sponsors/agencies actively implementing their respective projects and will be updated periodically in coordination with the project sponsors/agencies.

Funding Agreements
PCTPA will create a basic funding reimbursement agreement with each project sponsor/agency receiving SB 125 funds. This agreement will establish a general understanding and acknowledgement of how SB 125 funds will be disbursed for projects receiving the funds , and the project sponsor’s/agency’s reporting and auditing requirements.

Reporting and Auditing Requirements
Each project sponsor/agency receiving SB 125 funding is responsible for accurately tracking the receipt and expenditure of SB 125 funds for their respective projects in accordance with CalSTA’s SB 125 Guidelines. Upon request, project sponsors/agencies may be required to submit the necessary

PCTPA’s Guidelines for the Administration and Distribution of SB125 Program Funds Adopted by the PCTPA Board of Directors on October 23, 2024

financial and other supporting documentation to PCTPA for the SB 125 program ’s administration.

Project sponsors/agencies unable to comply with these responsibilities may be subject to returning their SB 125 funds back to PCTPA for distribution to other eligible projects.

Amendments or Changes to SB 125 Funded Projects
Project sponsors/agencies must expend SB 125 funds on the projects identified in the SB 125 allocation request package submitted to and approved by CalSTA (Table 1). PCTPA may consider changes to existing and/or new SB 125 eligible projects upon request by the project sponsors/agencies. However, changes and/or additions to the SB 125 projects receiving funding may require approval from CalSTA before PCTPA can reprogram and distribute the funding accordingly.

Gavin Newsom
Governor
Toks Omishakin
Secretary
400 C apitol Mall, Suite 2340
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-323-5400
www.calsta.ca.gov

California Transportation Commission  Board of Pilot Commissioners  California Highway Patrol  Department of Motor Vehicles Department of Transportation  High Speed Rail Authority  Office of Traffic Safety  New Motor Vehicle Board July 8, 2024
Mr. Ma
tt Click
Executive Director
Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA)
299 Nevada Street
Auburn, CA 95603
D
ear Mr. Click:

I
n December 2023 PCTPA requested an allocation of $37,851,991 across all fiscal years to support the project listed below. This allocation includes a maximum request of $378,520 (ZETCP PTA) for administrative costs.

1. Sacramento to Roseville Third Main Track Phase 1 (existing TIRCP project and e
xpanded scope): Uses $10,000,000 of TIRCP funds to support completion of this existing project.

2. Electric Charging Infrastructure (new TIRCP project): Uses $2,510,740 of TIRCP funds for this new project. Elements include construction of two new electric overhead charging stations at the Roseville Transit Galleria Mall and at the Louis Lane & Orlando Avenue Transit Center in Roseville, CA.

3. Electric Bus and Van Purchases (new TIRCP project): Uses $3,354,086 of TIRCP funds and $4,730,057 of ZETCP funds across all fiscal years to support this new project. Project includes purchasing twelve 40-foot electric buses to support i
nterregional commuter services, nine 35-foot electric buses for use on local route s
ervices, and twelve electric vans to support on-demand microtransit services.

4. Electric Van Purchase (new TIRCP project): Uses $400,000 of TIRCP funds to purchase two electric transit vans to support increased demand on existing microtransit services.

5. City Corporation Yard EV Charging Infrastructure Upgrades (new TIRCP project):

Uses $600,000 of TIRCP funds across all fiscal years to support this new project.

Project includes the design and construction of charging infrastructure at this transit yard, which is operated by Auburn Transit.

6. Roseville Transit Bus Shelter Replacement (new TIRCP project): Uses $1,116,250 of future year TIRCP for this new project. Includes removal of substandard shelters and installation of new shelters. Shelter replacement will be prioritized by their existing condition and proximity to disadvantaged communities.

7. Nevada Street Station Electric Charging Infrastructure (new TIRCP project): Use s
$
1,610,740 of future year TIRCP for this new project. Includes the design and construction of bus charging infrastructure at this transit station located in Auburn.

ATTACHMENT 1

July 8, 2024

8. Capi tal Bus Purchase and ZEB Charging Infrastructure Improvements (new TIRCP project): Uses $13,162,598 of future year TIRCP for this new project. Elements include purchasing four cut-away buses to replace and expand vehicles of the e
xisting fleet being used for microtransit services. Also includes purchasing eight new buses to be used on fixed-route services as well as installation of charging infrastructure.

CalSTA has reviewed for completeness the allocation request, including the required data and technical submissions and the proposed project. It has been determined the submission package meets the minimum program requirements and I am pleased to notify you that the allocation request has been approved. CalSTA will continue working with PCTPA and partner state agencies to analyze and validate the technical submissions prior to future disbursements.

C
alSTA will disburse $16,356,936 of TIRCP funds (100% General Fund) and $1,900,006 of ZETCP funds ($1,019,543.22 GGRF + $880,462.78 PTA) for a cumulative total of $18,256,942. A total amount of $16,397,478 of TIRCP and $3,197,571 of ZETCP remains available to PCTPA in future fiscal years. This funding will be disbursed in future allocation actions.

Ca
lSTA will modify the SB 125 Program Guidelines no later than September 30, 2024, for the distribution of funds for the 2024-25 fiscal year, which may include updated fund totals available to PCTPA per year across all fiscal years that were impacted as part of the 2024 final budget agreement.

PC
TPA is responsible for tracking the receipt and utilization of these funds separately, and recording interest earned (or other investment income earned) on each fund source separately. The interest or investment earnings must also be spent on approved eligible projects within each program and will be accounted for when PCTPA submits its required Annual Report.

P
lease expect additional correspondence from CalSTA to verify PCTPA‘s proper account information prior to the completion of the transfer of funds.

If
you have any questions, please contact CalSTA Chief Deputy Secretary Chad Edison at 916-247-0322.

S
incerely,
T

OKS OMISHAKIN
Secretary
ATTACHMENT 1

10/1/2024
Recipient Funding Source
(TIRCP or ZETCP) 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 Estimated Costs % Share Received Notes (as of August 8, 2024)
PCTPA SB 125 Administration (1%) ZETCP 378,520$ $ 378,520 1% Per SB 125 program guidelines, this amount was required to be requested up front in FY 23/24
Placer County (PCT and TART) 5,229,754$ 7,932,844$ -$ -$ 13,162,598$ 35% Capital Bus Purchases & ZEB Charging Infrastructure
Improvements TIRCP 5,229,754$ 7,932,844$ -$ 13,162,598$ Advanced $5.2 million from FY 24/25 to FY 23/24 to cover immediate expenditure needs for TART electric bus purchases ($2.2 million) and PCT bus replacement needs (CNG and electric, $3 million). May advance more bus purchases from FY 2024/25 to utilize FY 2023/24 funding available.

Auburn 1,000,000$ 1,610,740$ -$ -$ 2,610,740$ 7% Electric Vehicle (EV) Van purchase TIRCP 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ No change proposed, vehicle purchase to encumber expenses in FY 24/25
City Corporation Yard (EV) Charging Infrastructure
Upgrades TIRCP 600,000$
Advanced City Corp Yard charging infrastructure project ($600K) to FY 23/24 to accommodate more immediate expenditure needs encumbered in FY 24/25
Nevada Street Station Electric Charging Infrastructure
Improvements TIRCP -$ 1,610,740$ -$ -$ 1,610,740$ No change proposed, design work to begin in FY 23/24 Roseville 7,386,312$ 2,182,107$ 1,065,857$ 1,065,857$ 11,700,133$ 31% Electric Bus and Van Purchases TIRCP and ZETCP 4,875,572$ 1,065,857$ 1,065,857$ 1,065,857$ 8,073,143$ Only approximately $1.1 million needed in FY 23/24 for ZEV bus and van purchases, with mor funding being needed in FY 24/25.

However, Roseville anticipates fully encumbering funding for this project by FY 27/28
Electric Charging Infrastructure Projects: Roseville
Galleria and Louis Orlando TIRCP 2,510,740$ 2,510,740$ Funding for Galleria charging needed now to address current construction expenses, Louis/Orlando includes design and construction funding that can be expended by FY 27/28
Roseville Transit Bus Shelter Replacement TIRCP 1,116,250$ -$ 1,116,250$ No change proposed, planning work to start following Roseville COA project completion in FY 24/25
Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority -$ -$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 26% Sacramento to Roseville Third Main Track: Phase 1 TIRCP 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 10,000,000$ Per conversation with CCJPA staff, funding is needed in FY 25/26 or FY 26/27 at the latest
Request Total 13,994,586$ 11,725,691$ 6,065,857$ 6,065,857$ 37,851,991$ 37,851,991$ SB 125 Funding Allocation 18,256,942$ 6,531,683$ 6,531,683$ 6,531,683$ 37,851,991$ Capacity (Excess or Shortfall) 4,262,356$ (5,194,008)$ 465,826$ 465,826$ -$ LEGEND
Available Funding Capacity
Over Available Funding Capacity
Estimated amounts of SB 125 funding to be
distributed annually during planning period
Draft SB 125 Funding Plan
5-Year Funding Plan (August 2024)
ATTACHMENT 2

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.3
File #: 0721
Item ID: 2026-372

Title: Fiscal Year 2025-26 Transportation Development Act Claims Contact: Kimberly Goulet 916-746-1320 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claims in the amount of $12,910,937 and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claims in the amount of $12,910,937 and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute them on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) has adopted the FY2025-26 Final Findings of Apportionment for the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), State Transit Assistance (STA), and Senate Bill 1 (SB1) State of Good Repair (SGR). Together, these programs comprise the Transportation Development Act (TDA) resources. The following outlines the funding sources and corresponding amounts.

1. LTF revenue is generated from a quarter-cent sales tax in Placer County and supports local transportation programs. The adopted LTF apportionment provides $11,394,435 to Roseville for FY2025-26.

2. STA revenue is derived from state diesel fuel excise taxes, with additional funding from SB1. STA funds support administration, operations, maintenance, and capital projects for the City’s transit system. Total STA funding available to Roseville for FY2025-26 is $1,283,997.

3. SGR revenue provides funding for maintenance of the Roseville Transit bus fleet. The program is funded through a portion of the State Transportation Improvement Fee on vehicle registrations.

Total SGR funding available to Roseville for FY2025-26 is $232,505.

Combining LTF, STA and SGR funds equals a total request of $12,910,937.

FISCAL IMPACT
The TDA claims provide a total of $12,910,937 in revenues to the Transportation and Transit Fund programs and projects. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Submission of the FY2025-26 Transportation Development Act claims meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Kimberly Goulet, Administrative Technician

Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-170

2. Final 25-26 TDA Apportionments

3. FY_2025-26_TDAClaimWorksheet_DRAFT

4. TDA Claim Forms FY 2025-26 DRAFT_4.28.26

REVIEWERS:

Kimberly Goulet, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 4/28/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 4/29/2026 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 4/30/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-170

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE 2024/25 TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIMS TO THE

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200, and Title 21 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with Section 6600, authorize local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and

WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the FY2025/26 Transportation Development Act Claims in the amount of $12,910,937 to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency as follows:

1. Local Transportation Funds for public transportation system purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 of the California Public Utilities Code, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $11,394,435.

2. State Transit Assistance Funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,283,997.

3. State of Good Repair Funds for transit maintenance as provided by in Senate Bill 1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $232,505.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

___________________________
City Clerk

FY 2024/2025 FY 2025/2026 FY 2025/2026
Estimated Fund Revenue Apportionment
Balance Subtotal (1) Subtotal Total
$1,662,406 $33,562,102 $35,224,508

2.36898677% $795,082 $795,082
$132,254 $132,254
TRPA TOTAL $795,082 $927,336
$264 $264
$927,072

97.63101323% $32,111,680 $32,111,680
$1,530,152 $1,530,152
PCTPA TOTAL $32,111,680 $33,641,832
$8,736 $8,736
$475,000 $475,000
$30,603 $632,559 $663,162
$67,480 $1,394,792 $1,462,272
$1,432,069 $29,600,593 $31,032,662
Population FY 2025/2026 FY 2024/2025 Carryover Revenue
January 1, 2025 Allocation Subtotal Apportionment(6) Apportionment PLACER COUNTY 103,305 25.10681424% $7,431,766 $359,547 $7,791,313 AUBURN 13,286 3.22897376% $955,795 $46,241 $1,002,037
COLFAX 1,996 0.48509947% $143,592 $6,947 $150,539
LINCOLN 54,520 13.25031230% $3,922,171 $189,754 $4,111,925 LOOMIS 6,689 1.62566653% $481,207 $23,281 $504,488
ROCKLIN 73,172 17.78341621% $5,263,997 $254,671 $5,518,667 ROSEVILLE 158,494 38.51971750% $11,402,065 $551,629 $11,953,694 TOTAL 411,462 100.00% $29,600,593 $1,432,069 $31,032,662 Revenue Planning Available to
Apportionment Contribution(7) Claimant(8)
PLACER COUNTY $7,791,313 ($311,653) $7,479,660
AUBURN $1,002,037 ($40,081) $961,955
COLFAX $150,539 ($6,022) $225,629
Increased by $81,111 for Colfax/Roseville fund
swap per Resolution 25-22
LINCOLN $4,111,925 ($164,477) $3,947,448
LOOMIS $504,488 ($20,180) $484,308
ROCKLIN $5,518,667 ($220,747) $5,297,921
ROSEVILLE $11,953,694 ($478,148) $11,394,435
Reduced by $81,111 for Colfax/Roseville fund swap
per Resolution 25-22
TOTAL $31,032,662 ($1,241,306) $29,791,356
NOTES:
4) Pedestrian and Bicycle Allocation is 2% of the remaining apportionment, per PCTPA Board direction. 5) Community Transit Service Article 4.5 allocation is up to 5% of the remaining apportionment, per PCTPA Board direction.

FY 2025/26 Article 4.5 allocation is set at 4.5%. TRPA Population2 9,984 2.36898677% PCTPA Population 411,462 97.63101323%
TOTAL 421,446 100.00000000%
PCTPA LTF Fund Balance
TRPA LTF Fund Balance
FINAL FINDINGS OF APPORTIONMENT FOR FY 2025/2026
August 2025

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY (PCTPA)
PCTPA Revenue Estimate

PLACER COUNTY LTF REVENUE ESTIMATE

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF)
TRPA Revenue Estimate (2)

2. Western Slope and Tahoe Basin for Placer County as of January 1, 2025, DOF, June 6, 2025.

County Auditor Administrative Costs

BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT BY PCTPA
Sources:

Jurisdiction
PCTPA Administrative and Planning Costs (3)
January 1, 2025 DOF Population Estimates1
Community Transit Service Article 4.5 Allocation (5)
Apportionment of FY 2025/2026 PCTPA LTF Revenue Estimate Available to Claimant Apportionment of FY 2025/2026 PCTPA LTF Revenue Estimate by Jurisdiction Pedestrian and Bicycle Allocation (4)
Percent (%)Jurisdiction

BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT BY TRPA
County Auditor Administrative Costs
1) FY 2025/26 LTF balance based on August 1, 2025 Estimated LTF Fund Estimate provided by the Placer County Auditor

1. Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, DOF, released May 1, 2025. 8) Assumes 0.5% growth in revenue over FY 2024/25
3) Apportioned per Section 7.1 PCTPA Rules & Bylaws for FY 2025/26 Final Overall Work Program and Budget, May 28, 2025. 2) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency receives funds proportional to its population within Placer County (see box below). 6) FY 2024/25 carryover apportionment (see next page) uses May 2025 DOF population estimates. 7) PCTPA receives 4% of apportionment for regional planning purposes and implementation of federal planning requirements.

Printed:8/8/2025

Amount of FY 2024/2025 Carryover:

POPULATION
JURISDICTION January 1,
2025(1) PERCENT
FY 2024/2025

CARRYOVER

ALLOCATION
TOTAL

CARRYOVER

ALLOCATION
PLACER COUNTY 103,305 25.11% $359,547 $359,547
AUBURN 13,286 3.23% $46,241 $46,241
COLFAX 1,996 0.49% $6,947 $6,947
LINCOLN 54,520 13.25% $189,754 $189,754
LOOMIS 6,689 1.63% $23,281 $23,281
ROCKLIN 73,172 17.78% $254,671 $254,671
ROSEVILLE 158,494 38.52% $551,629 $551,629
TOTAL 411,462 100.00% $1,432,069 $1,432,069
Sources:

2. FY 2024/25 LTF balance based on August 1, 2025 Final LTF Fund Estimate provided by the Placer County Auditor
Calculation of FY 2025/2026 PCTPA LTF Carryover
$1,432,069

1. Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, DOF, May 1, 2025.

Using 2025 Population - Western Slope
Printed:8/8/2025

$566,636
$80,012
$646,648
$0
$646,648
January PUC 99313 PUC 99313 Reallocation PUC 99313
Jurisdiction 2025 Population Population to Transit Total Population(2)
Percentage Allocation Operator(3)
Allocation
Placer County 103,305 25.11% $142,264 $187,809 $330,073 Auburn 13,286 3.23% $18,297 $0 $18,297
Colfax 1,996 0.49% $2,749 ($2,749) $0
Lincoln 54,520 13.25% $75,081 ($75,081) $0
Loomis 6,689 1.63% $9,212 ($9,212) $0
Rocklin 73,172 17.78% $100,767 ($100,767) $0 Roseville 158,494 38.52% $218,267 $0 $218,267 TOTAL 411,462 100.00% $566,636 ($0) $566,636
(3) Placer County Transit will apply the equivalent SGR PUC 99313 shares from the Cities of Colfax, Lincoln, Rocklin, and the Town of Loomis to preventive maintenance.

PUC 99314 PUC 99314 PUC 99314 Total
Jurisdiction Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Jurisdiction Basis(4)
Percentage Allocation Allocation
Placer County $5,410,141 81.9% $65,510 $395,583
Auburn $21,830 0.3% $264 $18,561
Colfax $0 0.0% $0 $0
Lincoln $0 0.0% $0 $0
Loomis $0 0.0% $0 $0
Rocklin $0 0.0% $0 $0
Roseville $1,175,827 17.8% $14,238 $232,505
TOTAL $6,607,798 100.0% $80,012 $646,648
FY 2025/26
Jurisdiction Allocation
Amount
Placer County $187,809
Placer County $207,774
Auburn $18,561
Roseville $232,505
FY 2025/26 Total $646,648
FY 2025/2026 SGR Project Summary
Project Title
FY 2025/2026 Jurisdiction PUC Section 99314 SGR Fund Allocation Notes: (4) FY 2025/2026 State of Good Repair Final Allocation Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2025 Bus Stop Improvement and Replacement Program
Placer County Transit Preventative Maintenance
Operational Support
Replacement of 35’ Bus
FY 2025/2026 Jurisdiction PUC Section 99313 SGR Fund Allocation

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
September 2025
(EXCLUDING TAHOE BASIN)
FY 2025/2026 STATE OF GOOD REPAIR (SGR) FINAL ALLOCATION ESTIMATE Notes: (1) FY 2025/2026 State of Good Repair Final Allocation Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2025 (2) Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, DOF, released May 1, 2025.

PUC 99313 Allocation
PUC 99314.8 Allocation
Total SGR Allocation(1)
Less Percent Allocation of PUC 99313 to WPCTSA (5% max) Total SGR Allocation Available to Jurisdictions
9/4/2025

$3,267,250
$461,351
$3,728,601
$147,026
$3,581,575
January PUC 99313 PUC 99313
Jurisdiction 2025 Population Population
Population(3)
Percentage Allocation
Placer County 103,305 25.11% $783,389
Auburn 13,286 3.23% $100,751
Colfax 1,996 0.49% $15,136
Lincoln 54,520 13.25% $413,439
Loomis 6,689 1.63% $50,724
Rocklin 73,172 17.78% $554,882
Roseville 158,494 38.52% $1,201,901
TOTAL 411,462 100.00% $3,120,224 Notes: (1) 2025/2026 State Transit Assistance Allocation Final Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2025. (2) 4.5% of unencumbered PUC 99313 Allocation is allocated to WPCTSA. (3) Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, DOF, released May 1, 2025.

PUC = Public Utilities Code
PUC 99314 PUC 99314 PUC 99314 Total
Jurisdiction Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Jurisdiction Basis(4)
Percentage Allocation Allocation
Placer County $5,410,141 81.9% $377,732 $1,161,120
Auburn $21,830 0.3% $1,524 $102,275
Colfax $0 0.0% $0 $15,136
Lincoln $0 0.0% $0 $413,439
Loomis $0 0.0% $0 $50,724
Rocklin $0 0.0% $0 $554,882
Roseville $1,175,827 17.8% $82,095 $1,283,997
TOTAL $6,607,798 100.0% $461,351 $3,581,575
Notes: (4) 2025/2026 State Transit Assistance Allocation Preliminary Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2025.

FY 2025/2026 Jurisdiction PUC Section 99313 STA Fund Allocation FY 2025/2026 Jurisdiction PUC 99314 STA Fund Allocation PUC Section 99313 +
99314
Less 4.5 Percent Allocation of PUC 99313 to WPCTSA(2)
Total STA Allocation Available to Jurisdictions
August 2025
(EXCLUDING TAHOE BASIN)

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
FY 2025/26 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) FUND FINAL ALLOCATION ESTIMATE PUC 99313 Allocation
PUC 99314 Allocation
Total STA Allocation(1)
1 8/8/2025

FISCAL YEAR:

JURISDICTION:
6,631,223.00$
76,109.00$
-$
1,985,257.00$
1,588,935.69$
12,219.62$
-$
421,688.06$
4,752,907.00$
1,307,186.00$
-$
-$
-$
1,468,986.00$
-$
-$
-$
229,455.00$
-$
682,324.47$
-$
180,083.00$
-$
19,336,373.84$

ESTIMATED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Part 1 of 4

2. FTA Operating Assistance

1. LCTOP- ZEB Replacement, ZEB Depot, Galleria Electric Charging

2. SCCP- ZEB Replacement, ZEB Depot

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648)

9. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d; <CTSA>)

6. LTF-Capital expenses for contracted transit services (PUC 99400e; Article 8e)

7. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a)

8. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b)

11. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b)

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM WORKSHEET
B. Interest Earnings through June 30, 2024.

A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2024. From TDA Financial Audit Report)

1. FTA Planning Assistance

4. Other (list) CARES, CRRSAA
G. Other Revenues

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

10. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b)

2. Charters

3. Other (list) __________________________________

12. Other (list) SPRTA, PCAPCD

1. Passenger Fares
2025/26
City of Roseville
D. State Grants (Source/Amount):
-$

3. FTA Capital Assistance
I. FY 2024/25 AVAILABLE RESOURCES
C. Federal Grants & Reimbursements received in 2024/25:

3. LTF-Community Transit Services(PUC 99275; Article 4.5)

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c; Article 8c) E. Local Cash Grants:

F. Operating Revenues:

H. TOTAL FY 2024/25 AVAILABLE RESOURCES
(A+B+C+D+E+F+G)

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

599,014.41$
-$
-$
297,996.67$
81,433.90$
1,127,255.88$
(475.11)$
741,845.33$
17,880.84$
122,022.00$
4,041,747.00$
72,420.60$
131,011.00$
177,297.08$
319,604.00$
-$
-$
-$
414.49$
2,773,405.90$
88,572.39$
184,496.31$
61,498.77$
268,713.56$
85,064.72$
2,123,373.24$
63,569.61$
81,199.12$
5,856,188.40$
20,823.73$
19,336,373.84$
-$

1. Taylor Rd Commuter Bus Stop

2. Commuter Bus Replacement

3. On Board Bus Technology

4. Purchase of Eight Replacement Dial-A-Ride Buses

10. PW-AT Workforce Development
L. Other Uses:

7. Purchased Transit Services

5. Utilities

6. Insurance

2. Operating Salaries and Wages

3. Other Salaries and Wages

4. Fringe Benefits
II. FY 2024/25 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
I. Personnel

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages

12. Miscellaneous

5. Microtransit Vehicle and Charger Purchase

6. Zero Emission Bus Depot Project

7. Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis

8. South Placer County Express Bus Service - Capital
N. Estimated Deferred Revenue as of June 30, 2025 (H-M) J. Services and Supplies

1. Professional Services

14. Leases & Rentals

2. Maintenance Services

3. Other Services

10. Other Materials and Supplies

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed

13. Interest

8. Facility Services/System Repair & Maintenance
M. TOTAL FY 2024/25 EXPENSES & USES (I+J+K+L)

9. ZEB Depot Phase II

1. Operational & Capital Reserve

2. Other Capital Projects
K. Capital Assets (Itemize)

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies

9. IT Services

-$
96,783.00$
-$
595,259.00$
1,171,249.00$
-$
600,000.00$
5,001,927.53$
-$
190,732.75$
-$
646,915.00$
-$
363,000.00$
-$
8,665,866.28$
B. Interest earnings through June 30, 2025

2. FTA Operating Assistance

3. FTA Capital Assistance

1. FTA Planning Assistance

BUDGETED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES & EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
I. FY 2025/26 NON-TDA BUDGETED RESOURCES & DEFERRED REVENUE

1. PCAPCD - ZEB Depot

2. SPRTA -
E. Local Non-TDA Cash Grants:

1. LCTOP

2. Solutions for Congested Corridors (SCCP)
A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2025-- From Part 1, line N) D. State Grants (Source/Amount):

C. Federal Grants & Reimbursements

4. Other (list) __________________________________
Part 2 of 4
G. Other Revenues

3. SMAQMD

2. Charters

1. Passenger Fares
F. Operating Revenues:

3. Other (list) __________________________________

1. Non-Transportation Revenue
H. TOTAL FY 2025/26 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA
BUDGETED RESOURCES (A+B+C+D+E+F+G)

8,665,866.28$
II. FY 2025/26 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
593,982.00$
-$
-$
366,317.00$
193,399.00$
1,340,768.00$
(300.00)$
873,299.00$
26,840.00$
95,764.00$
5,855,928.00$
57,530.00$
143,379.00$
222,830.00$
401,563.00$
-$
(78,217.00)$
-$
1,892,929.00$
426,872.00$
795,329.00$
4,206,727.00$
131,913.00$
200,000.00$
83,184.28$
-$
2,000,000.00$
N. TOTAL FY 2025/26 EXPENSES & USES (J+K+L+M) 19,830,036.28$ O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) (11,164,170.00)$

5. Utilities

6. Insurance

4. Fringe Benefits

1. Professional Services

2. Maintenance Services
K. Services and Supplies:

3. Other Services

1. Purchase of Eight Replacement Dial-A-Ride Buses

2. Microtransit Vehicle and Charger Purchase

3. ZEB Depot Phase II

4. South Placer County Express Bus Service - Capital
L. Capital Assets (Itemize):

3. Other Salaries and Wages
J. Personnel:

7. Purchased Transit Services

8. Facility Services / System Repair & Maintenance

9. IT Services

7. Other Capital Projects

10. Other Materials and Supplies

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed

6. ZEB Depot Phase III

14. Leases & Rentals

12. Miscellaneous, Cash Over/Short, Uncollectible, Other Fees

13. Interest

5. PW-AT Workforce Development
I. TOTAL FY 2025/26 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA BUDGETED
RESOURCES (From Line H)

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages

2. Operating Salaries and Wages

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies
M. Other Uses:

1. Capital Outlay Reserve Contribution.(CCR 6648)

2. Operational & Capital Reserve

O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) (11,164,170.00)$
8,107,128.00$
1,540,540.00$
-$
-$
-$
-$
9,647,668.00$
1,283,997.00$
-$
-$
-$

5. TOTAL STAF CLAIM (Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4) 1,283,997.00$
232,505.00$
232,505.00$
11,164,170.00$

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

4. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b)

3. LTF-Community Transit Services (PUC 99275; Article 4.5)

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c: Article 8c)

2. TOTAL SGR CLAIM (R1)
S. TOTAL 2025/26 TRANSIT CLAIMS (P6 + Q5 + R2)
R. FY 2025/26 SGR CLAIMS:

1. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b)
III. FY 2025/26 TDA TRANSIT CLAIMS

1. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a)

2. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b)

3. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d) / CTSA
P. FY 2025/26 LTF TRANSIT CLAIMS:

Q. FY 2025/26 STAF CLAIMS:

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648)

6. LTF-Capital for contracted transit service
(PUC 99400e; Article 8e)

7. TOTAL LTF CLAIM (P1+P2+P3+P4+P5)

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

I. FY 2024/25 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES
6,866,999.31$
4,805,344.00$
94,940.52$
11,767,283.83$
1,026,220.58$
355,746.58$
1,926,310.64$
-$
I. Transportation Planning Process (P.U.C. 99402) 59,547.00$ J. Other -Indirect Costs 222,717.00$
K. Capital Reserves -$
3,590,541.80$
8,176,742.03$
C. Interest Earned on claimant TDA streets and roads cash balances through June 30, 2025.

II. FY 2024/25 TDA STREET AND ROAD EXPENDITURES
Part 3 of 4

ESTIMATED STREETS AND ROADS TDA EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Actual Unexpended Prior Year TDA Streets And Roads Cash Receipts Held in Claimant's Treasury as of June 30, 2024. From TDA Fiscal Audits)
B. FY 2024/25 TDA Cash Receipts from LTF trust fund for streets and roads purposes (PUC 99400a).

F. Maintenance
G. Construction
L. TOTAL FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES (E+F+G+H+I)
M. Estimated Carryover of TDA Street and Road Revenues at June 30, 2025 (D-J)
H. Equipment
D. Total FY 2024/25 Available TDA Street and Road Resources. (A+B+C) E. Administration and Engineering

8,176,742.03$
11,394,435.00$
9,647,668.00$
1,746,767.00$
1,746,767.00$
-$
9,923,509.03$
1,353,863.00$
268,754.00$
4,614,200.00$
-$
-$
258,408.00$
6,495,225.00$
3,428,284.03$ O. Estimated Carryover as of June 31, 2026 (D-N) I. Maintenance
J. Construction
K. Equipment
L. Transportation Planning Process (P.U.C. 99402)
M. Other
H. Administration and Engineering
B. 2025/26 TDA Funds Available For Streets And Roads
C. FY 2024/25 Estimated Interest Earned on TDA Cash Balances through June 30, 2025.

D. Total Estimated FY 2025/26 Available TDA Resources. (A+B4+C) II. FY 2025/26 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES

3. Balance of 2025/26 LTF Apportionment (B1-B2)

4. FY 2025/26 LTF Apportionment To be Claimed for Streets and Roads Purposes Pursuant to PUC 99400a. (Can Not Exceed Line B3)
A. Carryover as of June 30, 2025 (From Part 3, Line K.) STREETS AND ROADS TDA BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
I. FY 2025/26 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES

1. FY 2025/26 LTF Total Apportionment (From PCTPA)

2. FY 2025/26 LTF Transit Claim (From Part 2, Line P6)
Part 4 of 4
N. Total FY 2025/26 Estimated Expenditures (H+I+J+K+L+M)

Transportation Development Act
Claim Forms

Revised September 2024
Contents
TDA CLAIM FORMS ...................................................................................................................................................2

ANNUAL VERIFICATION OF TDA COMPLIANCE TO ACCOMPANY LTF AND STA CLAIMS FOR TRANSIT / STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES ..........................................................................................................................3 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE QUALIFYING CRITERIA WORKSHEET INSTRUCTIONS ............................................5 CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS ...................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.

CLAIM FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS .............................................................................................7 CLAIM FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM FUNDS .................................................................................8 TDA ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN .....................................................................................................9 LTF BICYCLE / PEDESTRIAN CLAIM FORMS ..........................................................................................................100 CLAIM FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FUNDS ............................................................................................111 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FINANCIAL PLAN .....................................................122 SAMPLE RESOLUTION ...........................................................................................................................................133

2 Revised September 2025

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

TDA CLAIM FORMS

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) CLAIM FORMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PCTPA A MINIMUM OF THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO A PCTPA BOARD MEETING. FOR THE LATEST BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE, VISIT WWW.PCTPA.NET.

A completed claim package includes the following completed forms:

• TDA Compliance Checklist
• TDA Claim Worksheet (Excel file)
• STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet (Excel file)
• Claim for Local Transportation Funds
• Claim for State Transit Assistance Funds
• Claim for State of Good Repair Program Funds
• TDA Annual Project and Financial Plan (see attached sample)

Certified copy of resolution from the claimant's governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA. The resolution must include the amount claimed, the fiscal year for which funds are claimed, and the purpose for which the claim is made, identified by the article and section of the Act which authorizes such claims. See attached sample resolution.

If claiming Article 8c funds, copy of signed contract with whom claimant is contracting for transit service.

Only ONE copy of the claim form and PCTPA Board of Directors resolution will be returned to the claimant following approval.

Audit Policy
To help ensure that TDA audits are completed in a timely manner and the requirements of the TDA are met, the following policy was adopted by the PCTPA Board on March 22, 2006:

After approval of the Final TDA Apportionment, claimants who submit TDA claims will receive only 50% of the total approved Local Transportation Fund (LTF) claim if a completed TDA audit has not been received by PCTPA at the time of the claim.

The remaining 50% of approved LTF claim will be paid to the claimant upon receipt by PCTPA of the completed TDA audit. State Transit Assistance (STA) claims will be paid in full following approval of an STA claim, regardless of whether a completed TDA audit has been received.

3 Revised September 2025

ANNUAL VERIFICATION OF TDA COMPLIANCE TO ACCOMPANY LTF AND STA CLAIMS

FOR TRANSIT / STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES

PART I – ALL CLAIMANTS

1. Date annual TDA fiscal and compliance audit was approved by PCTPA Board:

Click or tap to enter a date.

2. Is the claimant's retirement system fully funded?
☐ YES
☒ NO

3. Is the claimant using the maximum Federal funds available for transit and/or streets/roads purposes?
☒ YES
☐ NO

PART II – TRANSIT CLAIMANTS

4. Date Transit Operator's Financial Transaction Report was submitted to State Controller's Office: Click or tap to enter a date. Attach copy of dated, signed cover sheet rom report.

5. Are public transit vehicles routinely staffed with one driver?

☒ YES
☐ NO (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.

6. Has the proposed transit operating budget changed by more than 15% compared to the previous year?
☒ Yes (Explain) New multi-year Transit Operator contract for continued operation of the City’s Transit system.
☐ NO

7. Did the transit operator meet its minimum farebox recovery requirement during the previous fiscal year? (requirement: 15% - Roseville; 12.94% - Placer County; 10% - Auburn)1

☒ YES
☐ NO (see below)

If the farebox recovery requirement was not met, then claimant must complete the following worksheet for the most recent fiscal year. 1Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with farebox recovery ratio requirement during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the requirement was met. AB 149 of 2021 extends the non- compliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

4 Revised September 2025
Transit Operating Expenses: enter text. +
Capital Purchases/Reserves: enter text. = LTF spent in most Subtotal: enter text. - recent fiscal year
Federal Revenues: enter text. = cannot exceed
STA Revenues: enter text. - result below.

Total: enter text. * 0.5= enter text.

8. Is there a prohibition on the employment of part-time drivers or on contracting with common carriers?
☐ YES
☒ NO (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.

9. Are STA funds being used for transit operating purposes this fiscal year? ☒ YES (see below)
☐ NO

If STA funds are being used for transit operating purposes, indicate which efficiency standard was met. In calculating the operating cost, operators may exclude costs that exceed prior year costs, as adjusted by the CPI. Notes: (1) Use the STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet contained in the TDA Claim workbook to determine eligible exclusions. (2) These items may also be excluded when computing the farebox recovery ratio. (3) You may refer to operating cost figures from TDA fiscal audits for the applicable fiscal year.

Efficiency Standard #1: ☒ Yes ☐ No2
Efficiency Standard #2: ☒ Yes ☐ No2

If neither efficiency standard was met, list the percentage of STA Funding limited to:

Capital Expenditures: Enter %% Operating Expenditures: Enter %.%

10. Describe or attach current fare structure:

Please see the attached fare structure as outlined in the Roseville Transit Service Guides, overview on Roseville Transit’s website at:
https://www.roseville.ca.gov/public_works/transit/fares_passes.php

11. Attach copy of latest CHP terminal inspection report. ATTACHED

12. Each transit claimant must report on efforts to implement recommendations included in the FY 2021/22 through FY 2023/24 Triennial Performance Audit, which was completed in June 2025 (attach additional pages as necessary).

Roseville has developed a standard policy for calculating FTE’s and we have been using that standard since the last Triennial Performance Audit.

2Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with required STA efficiency standards during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the standards was met. AB 149 of 2021 extends the non- compliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

5 Revised September 2025

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE

QUALIFYING CRITERIA WORKSHEET INSTRUCTIONS

Assembly Bill 90 of 2019-20 temporarily provides relief from non-compliance with STA Qualifying Criteria for FY 2019-20 and 2020-21 due to impact of COVID-19 on transit agencies. AB 149 of 2021 extended non-compliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

The purpose of the STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet is for the claimant to determine the proportion of STA funding eligible for operating and capital expenditures in the current fiscal year. Per STA regulations, one of two efficiency standards must be met for a claimant to utilize its full STA Allocation for operating purposes. The first efficiency standard evaluates whether the total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour increased at a rate greater than the prior year total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour as adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the State of California. The second efficiency standard evaluates whether the average total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour in the three latest years increased at a rate greater than the average of the preceding three years total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour as adjusted by CPI for the same period. Should neither efficiency standard be met, STA funding for operating expenditures will be reduced by the lowest percentage by which the claimant’s total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour exceeded the target for either standard. The remaining percentage will be limited for capital expenditures.

The STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet is a tab embedded within the TDA Claim Worksheet. The STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet simplifies the process of calculating the proportion of STA funding eligible for operating and capital expenditures. Please visit www.pctpa.net/TDA to download the file. The worksheet requires entry of the prior four years audited data for operating costs, allowable cost exemptions/exclusions under TDA, and revenue vehicle hours. Enter the appropriate numbers into Data Input Sections A, B, and D. DO NOT enter any numbers in the yellow highlighted boxes, as these boxes have been set up with formulas to automatically tabulate your claims. Cell O7 and O11 will indicate whether Efficiency Standard 1 or 2 are satisfied, respectively. Cell Q13 indicates the amount limited for capital expenditures while cell Q15 indicates the amount eligible for operating purposes.

This information should be input into question 9 of the Annual Verification Of TDA Compliance. The excel version of the qualifying criteria worksheet should be submitted with all other documents and forms when submitting a claim.

6 Revised September 2025

CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS

TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:[email protected]

The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for Local Transportation Funds be approved for Fiscal Year 2025/26, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Operations: $ 8,107,128 P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Capital: $1,540,540
P.U.C. 99275, Article 4.5, Community Transit Services $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99400a, Article 8a, Local Streets and Roads $1,746,767 P.U.C. 99402, Article 8a, Transportation Planning Process $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99400c, Article 8c, Contracted Transit Services: $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99400e, Article 8e, Capital for Contracted Services: $Click or tap here to enter $ C.C.R. 6648, Capital Reserve: $Click or tap here to enter $

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget. Claimant must submit a complete Fiscal and Compliance Audit for the prior fiscal year prior to issuance of instructions to the County Auditor to pay the claimant in full.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE: City Manager
DATE: DATE:

7 Revised September 2025

CLAIM FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS

TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:[email protected]

The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State Transit Assistance be approved in the amount of $$1,283,997 for Fiscal Year 2025/26 , in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

Transit Operations (6730a): $1,283,997
Transit Capital (6730a): $Click or tap here to enter $
Contracted Transit Services (6731b): $Click or tap here to enter $ Community Transit Services Provided by WPCTSA (6731.1): $Click or tap here to enter $

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE: City Manager
DATE: DATE:

8 Revised September 2025

CLAIM FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM FUNDS

TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email: [email protected]

The Choose Agency hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State of Good Repair Funds be approved in the amount of $232,505 for Fiscal Year Choose FY, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer.

Transit Capital (6730a): $232,505

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE: City Manager
DATE: DATE:

9 Revised September 2025

TDA ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN

This form will show the planned expenditures of all TDA funds claimed for the fiscal year in addition to any TDA funds carried over from previous years. Briefly describe all operational, capital and/or streets and roads projects which will be funded by TDA moneys. Please show BOTH prior year TDA funds (if any) and current year TDA funds to be used, provide the total cost of each project, and indicate all other sources of funding associated with each project. For capital projects, the projects listed, and their associated costs and funding sources should be consistent with the budget developed in the TDA Claim Worksheet completed for the submittal of this claim. The total project cost and total funding source(s) listed below should balance for each project. See attached sample plan for additional guidance.

Claimant: City of Roseville

Fiscal Year: FY 2025/26

Brief Project Description Project Cost Source of Funding & Amount

TRANSIT OPERATIONS

Administration & Svcs. $10,093,082
Operating Reserve $1,000,000

OPERATING COSTS $11,093,082
Interest Earnings from FY25 $96,783
Passenger Fares $646,915
Federal Grants $595,259
Local/Other Grants $363,000
LTF Article 4 FY26 $8,107,128
STA FY26 $1,283,997

OPERATIONAL REVENUE $11,093,082

TRANSIT CAPITAL PROJECTS

Transit Capital Projects $7,736,954
Capital Reserve $1,000,000

CAPITAL COSTS $8,736,954

FTA Capital Assistance $1,171,249
LTF Article 4 FY26 $1,540,540
SB1 SGR FY26 $232,505
State Grants $5,792,660

CAPITAL REVENUE $8,736,954

STREETS AND ROADS

TSM & Bikeway Program $1,353,863
Maintenance-Roadway $268,754
Construction $4,614,200
Other $258,408
Transp. Planning Process $0

Subtotal $6,495,225
Capital Reserve $0
STREETS & ROADS COSTS $6,495,225

Carryover $8,176,742
Interest Earnings from FY25 $0
LTF Article 8A FY26 $1,746,767
Transp. Planning Process $0
FY25 Claim Unreleased $0
STREETS & ROAD REV. $9,923,509

EST. CARRYOVER FY26 $3,428,284

10 Revised September 2025

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

LTF BICYCLE / PEDESTRIAN

CLAIM FORMS

BEFORE FILING THIS CLAIM, PLEASE CHECK WITH PCTPA STAFF TO ENSURE YOUR CLAIM IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN 5-YEAR CASH MANAGEMENT PLAN, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT WWW.PCTPA.NET/TDA.

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) CLAIM FORMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PCTPA A MINIMUM THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO A PCTPA BOARD MEETING. FOR THE LATEST BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE, VISIT WWW.PCTPA.NET.

A completed PED/BIKE claim package includes the following:
• Completed forms:
o Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Description and Financial Plan o Claim For LTF Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds
• Certified copy of resolution from the claimant's governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA. The resolution must include the specific dollar amount of LTF Bicycle/Pedestrian funds being requested. See attached sample resolution.

Only ONE original claim form and/or PCTPA Board of Directors resolution will be returned to the claimant following approval.

LTF Claims for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
At the discretion of the Board, PCTPA typically allocates 2% of the LTF for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. PCTPA works with staff of the six cities/town and the County of Placer to develop a cash management plan with a five-year horizon. Allocations are made to each jurisdiction based on existing and projected future population.

Using the attached bicycle/pedestrian claim forms, jurisdictions may submit claims to PCTPA that are consistent with the five-year cash management plan. The claim form must be accompanied by a resolution from the claimant’s governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA.

Approval of the claim by the PCTPA Board then reserves the funds for that jurisdiction’s bicycle and pedestrian facility projects. As the jurisdiction expends funds in implementing the projects, it should submit invoices, accompanied with appropriate documentation, to PCTPA. PCTPA will then forward allocation instructions to the County Auditor’s office, which will reimburse the jurisdiction up to the maximum amount of the original claim. If a jurisdiction does not claim its allocation of bicycle and pedestrian funds within the five-year window of the cash management plan, the funds will revert to the Revolving Match Fund (RMF).

11 Revised September 2025

CLAIM FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FUNDS

TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

FROM:

CLAIMANT: Choose Agency
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTACT PERSON: Click or tap here to enter text.

Phone:Click or tap here to
enter text.

Email:Click or tap here to enter text.

The Choose Agency hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code, AS AMENDED (Chapter 3, Section 99234), that this claim for Bicycle and Pedestrian funds in the amount of $Click or tap here to enter $ be approved for Fiscal Year Choose FY , to be drawn from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Trust Fund.

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for funds to be reserved. Jurisdictions will receive payment as reimbursement of funds expended in implementing bicycle and pedestrian projects. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

12 Revised September 2025

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FINANCIAL PLAN

Briefly describe the project for which you are applying for Bicycle / Pedestrian Funds. Also, identify all funding sources related to the project. The total project cost and total funding source(s) listed below should balance for each project.

Include a location map for the project as appropriate.

Claimant: Choose an item.

Fiscal Year: Choose an item.

Brief Project Description Project Cost Source of Funding & Amount

13 Revised September 2025

SAMPLE RESOLUTION
In the matter of a Resolution approving and authorizing execution of the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Local Transportation Fund, State Transit Assistance, and State of Good Repair Claims to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency.

The following resolution was duly passed by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] at a regular meeting held [date of meeting], by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Signed and approved by me after its passage. Attest:

[Signature of chair of governing board] [Signature of governing board clerk]

WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600 authorizing local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and

WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds.

Be it hereby resolved by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] that the [chair of governing board or authorized staff person] is authorized and directed to execute the attached Fiscal Year 2024/25 Transportation Development Act Claim(s) to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, in the amount of:

$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for transit purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and Article 8 commencing with Section 99400(c).

$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 and for the transportation planning process authorized by Article 8, commencing with section 99402.

$ [total STA amount] of State Transit Assistance funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5

$ [total SGR amount] of State of Good Repair funds for transit capital, as authorized by the Caltrans SGR guidelines and complying with Public Resources Code§ 21100 and§ 21150.).

14 Revised September 2025
$ [total LTF Bike/Ped amount] of Local Transportation Funds for bicycle and pedestrian purposes, as authorized by the California Public Utilities Code Section 99233.3, and by the California Code of Regulations Section 6655.2.

Be it further resolved that this claim is hereby approved by the [name of governing board].

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.4
File #: 0721
Item ID: 2026-426

Title: Zero Emission Bus Depot Project (Phase 2 and 3) - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment
Contact: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zero Emission Bus Depot Project (Phase 2 and 3) Contract Purchase Agreement to include the Federal Transit Administration's 2026 Federal Clauses.

Approval of this amendment will allow staff to continue to use federal dollars to help pay for the Zero Emission Bus Depot Project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve Amendment 1 to Contract Purchase Agreement (3004813) for the Zero Emission Bus Depot Project (Phase 2 and 3) to include the Federal Transit Administration's 2026 Federal Clauses, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
On August 8, 2025, the City Council approved a purchase agreement with Vasko Electric for the installation of electric vehicle charging stations at the Zero Emissions Bus Depot at the Roseville Corporation Yard. Funding for the project is from the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Low-No Grant and Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. In order to utilize FTA funding, contract agreements must include the FTA’s required federal clauses. These federal clauses are mandatory contract provisions required by FTA for third-party contracts funded by federal grants. These clauses ensure compliance with federal law and cover topics like Buy America, civil rights and labor protections.

The FTA Federal Clauses were inadvertently omitted from the original contract during approval.

This amendment adds the 2026 Federal Clauses to the existing agreement to ensure the project complies with all applicable federal requirements and regulations.

There is no change to the contract dollar amount.

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this amendment will allow staff to continue to use federal dollars to help pay for the Zero Emission Bus Depot Project. Failure to approve this amendment would likely result in Roseville having to repay the federal funds used to date on this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no

possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the amendment is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Planner

Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-173

2. CPA Amendment 1

REVIEWERS:

Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 5/12/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 5/12/2026 Jason Shykowski, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/14/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 5/18/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-173

APPROVING AMENDMENT 1 TO CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND VASKO ELECTRIC INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, Amendment 1 to Contract Purchase Agreement (3004813) for the Zero Emission Bus Depot Project (Phase 2 and 3, by and between the City of Roseville and Vasko Electric Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said amendment is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004813
Supplier Details:

Company Vasko Electric Inc
Contact Vince Linarez
Address 4300 Astoria St
Sacramento, CA 95838
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact Tiffany Valdez
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1109
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004813
Agreement 3004813
Agreement Date 07-JUL-2025
Change Order 3
Change Order Date 07-MAY-2026
Revision 2
Agreement Amount 1,422,638.58 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Vasko Electric Inc
4300 Astoria St
Sacramento, CA 95838
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 568-7700
(916) 568-7713
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials
AMENDMENT 1-
THIS CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT 3004813, WHICH WAS EXECUTED ON 8/6/25, IS HEREBY MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

THE 2026 FEDERAL CLAUSES ARE INCORPORATED INTO AND MADE PART OF

THE AGREEMENT AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN AND SHALL BE

BINDING UPON CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS PERFORMING WORK UNDER THE AGREEMENT.

ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

PLEASE CONTACT JAMES KREMKO AT 916-774-5741 OR BY EMAIL AT [email protected] FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS
AGREEMENT.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 10717 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
Tiffany Valdez Phone 1-916-746-1109
Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office.

2 Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004813
Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 3 Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249 5/12/2026
VP/Secretary
Andrew Vasko
President
5/8/2026
Darryl Vasko

1 Jan 26
Table of Contents
FEDERAL CLAUSES ........................................................................................................................... 3 ACCESS TO RECORDS AND REPORTS ............................................................................................... 3 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) .................................................................................... 3 BOND REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................... 4 BUS TESTING ................................................................................................................................... 6 BUY AMERICA REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................... 6 CARGO PREFERENCE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 6 CHANGES TO FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 7 CHARTER SERVICE ........................................................................................................................... 7 CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS AND REGULATIONS ......................................................................................... 8 CLEAN AIR ACT AND FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT .............................................. 10 CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT ........................................................... 11 DAVIS BACON ACT AND COPELAND ANTI-KICKBACK ACT ............................................................ 12 DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION ................................................................................................... 13 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) ........................................................................... 13 DOMESTIC PREFERENCES FOR PROCUREMENTS. ......................................................................... 14 ENERGY CONSERVATION .............................................................................................................. 15 FLY AMERICA ................................................................................................................................. 15 INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) TERMS ................................... 16 NO GOVERNMENT OBLIGATION TO THIRD PARTIES .................................................................... 16 NOTICE TO FTA AND U.S. DOT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF INFORMATION RELATED TO FRAUD, WASTE, ABUSE, OR OTHER LEGAL MATTERS ................................................................................ 16 PATENT RIGHTS AND RIGHTS IN DATA ......................................................................................... 17 PRE-AWARD AND POST-DELIVERY AUDITS OF ROLLING STOCK PURCHASES .............................. 19 PROGRAM FRAUD AND FALSE OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS AND RELATED ACTS .................. 19

PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT. ................................................................................................................................. 20 PROMPT PAYMENT ....................................................................................................................... 21 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE ARRANGEMENTS ........................................ 21 RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING ....................................................................................................... 22 SAFE OPERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES ....................................................................................... 24 SCHOOL BUS OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................... 24 Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

2 Jan 26
SEISMIC SAFETY ............................................................................................................................. 25 SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD ......................................................................................... 25 SOLID WASTES (RECOVERED MATERIALS) .................................................................................... 25 SPECIAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STATES ................................................................. 25 SUBSTANCE ABUSE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 26 TERMINATION ............................................................................................................................... 26 VETERANS HIRING PREFERENCE ................................................................................................... 30 VIOLATION AND BREACH OF CONTRACT ...................................................................................... 30 OTHER RECOMMENDED CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS ................................................................. 32 CONFORMANCE WITH ITS NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE ................................................................. 32 FEDERAL TAX LIABILITY AND RECENT FELONY CONVICTIONS ...................................................... 32 SEVERABILITY ................................................................................................................................ 32 TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS ............................................................................................................. 33

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

3 Jan 26

FEDERAL CLAUSES

ACCESS TO RECORDS AND REPORTS

a. Record Retention. The Contractor will retain, and will require its subcontractors of all tiers to retain, complete and readily accessible records related in whole or in part to the contract, including, but not limited to, data, documents, reports, statistics, leases, subcontracts, arrangements, other third-party Contracts of any type, and supporting materials related to those records.

b. Retention Period. The Contractor agrees to comply with the record retention requirements in accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.334. The Contractor shall maintain all books, records, accounts and reports required under this Contract for a period of at not less than three (3) years after the date of termination or expiration of this Contract, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Contract, in which case records shall be maintained until the disposition of all such litigation, appeals, claims or exceptions related thereto.

c. Access to Records. The Contractor agrees to provide sufficient access to FTA and its contractors to inspect and audit records and information, including such records and information the contractor or its subcontractors may regard as confidential or proprietary, related to performance of this contract in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.337.

d. Access to the Sites of Performance. The Contractor agrees to permit FTA and its contractors access to the sites of performance under this contract in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.337.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)

The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps, with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., which requires that accessible facilities and services be made available to persons with disabilities, including any subsequent amendments to that Act, and with the Architectural Barriers act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4151 et seq., which requires that buildings and public accommodations be accessible to persons with disabilities, including any subsequent amendments to that Act. In addition, the contractor agrees to comply with any and all applicable requirements issued by the FTA, DOT, DOJ, U.S. GSA, U.S. EEOC, U.S. FCC, any subsequent amendments thereto and any other nondiscrimination statute(s) that may apply to the Project.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

4 Jan 26

BOND REQUIREMENTS
For construction or facility improvement contracts or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may accept the bonding policy and requirements of the non-Federal entity provided that the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity has made a determination that the Federal interest is adequately protected. If such a determination has not been made, the minimum requirements must be as follows:
(a) A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to five percent of the bid price. The “bid guarantee” must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the bidder will, upon acceptance of the bid, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified. (b) A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “performance bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor's requirements under such contract.
(c) A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “payment bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract.

It is also understood and agreed that if the bidder should withdraw any part or all of their bid within [90] days after the bid opening without the written consent of the Agency, or refuse or be unable to enter into this Contract as provided above, or refuse or be unable to furnish adequate and acceptable Performance and Payment Bonds, or refuse or be unable to furnish adequate and acceptable insurance, as provided above, it shall forfeit its bid guaranty to the extent Agency’s damages occasioned by such withdrawal, or refusal, or inability to enter into a Contract, or provide adequate security thereof.

It is further understood and agreed that to the extent the defaulting bidder's bid guaranty shall prove inadequate to fully recompense Agency for the damages occasioned by default, then the bidder agrees to indemnify Agency and pay over to Agency the difference between the bid guarantee and Agency’s total damages so as to make Agency whole.

The bidder understands that any material alteration of any of the above or any of the material contained herein, other than that requested will render the bid unresponsive.

Performance Guarantee. A Performance Guarantee in the amount of 100% of the Contract value is required by the Agency to ensure faithful performance of the Contract. Either a Performance Bond or an Irrevocable Stand-By Letter of Credit shall be provided by the Contractor and shall remain in full force for the term of the Contract. The successful Bidder shall certify that it will provide the requisite Performance Guarantee to the Agency within ten Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

5 Jan 26
(10) business days from Contract execution. The Agency requires all Performance Bonds to be provided by a fully qualified surety company acceptable to the Agency and listed as a company currently authorized under 31 C.F.R. part 22 as possessing a Certificate of Authority as described hereunder. Agency may require additional performance bond protection when the contract price is increased. The increase in protection shall generally equal 100 percent of the increase in contract price. The Agency may secure additional protection by directing the Contractor to increase the amount of the existing bond or to obtain an additional bond.

If the Bidder chooses to provide a Letter of Credit as its Performance Guarantee, the Bidder shall furnish with its bid, certification that an Irrevocable Stand-By Letter of Credit will be furnished should the Bidder become the successful Contractor. The Bidder shall also provide a statement from the banking institution certifying that an Irrevocable Stand-By Letter of Credit for the action will be provided if the Contract is awarded to the Bidder. The Irrevocable Stand- By Letter of Credit will only be accepted by the Agency if:

1. A bank in good standing issues it. The Agency will not accept a Letter of Credit from an entity other than a bank.

2. It is in writing and signed by the issuing bank.

3. It conspicuously states that it is an irrevocable, non-transferable, “standby” Letter of Credit.

4. The Agency is identified as the Beneficiary.

5. It is in an amount equal to 100% of the Contract value. This amount must be in U.S. dollars.

6. The effective date of the Letter of Credit is the same as the effective date of the Contract

7. The expiration date of the Letter of Credit coincides with the term of the contract.

8. It indicates that it is being issued in order to support the obligation of the Contractor to perform under the Contract. It must specifically reference the Contract between the Agency and the Contractor the work stipulated herein.

The issuing bank’s obligation to pay will arise upon the presentation of the original Letter of Credit and a certificate and draft to the issuing bank’s representative at a location and time to be determined by the parties. This documentation will indicate that the Contractor is in default under the Contract.

Payment Bonds. A Labor and Materials Payment Bond equal to the full value of the contract must be furnished by the contractor to Agency as security for payment by the Contractor and subcontractors for labor, materials, and rental of equipment. The bond may be issued by a fully qualified surety company acceptable to (Agency) and listed as a company currently authorized under 31 C.F.R. part 223 as possessing a Certificate of Authority as described thereunder.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

6 Jan 26

BUS TESTING

The Contractor [Manufacturer] agrees to comply with the Bus Testing requirements under 49 U.S.C. 5318(e) and FTA's implementing regulation at 49 C.F.R. part 665 to ensure that the requisite testing is performed for all new bus models or any bus model with a major change in configuration or components, and that the bus model has achieved a passing score. Upon completion of the testing, the contractor shall obtain a copy of the bus testing reports from the operator of the testing facility and make that report(s) publicly available prior to final acceptance of the first vehicle by the recipient.

BUY AMERICA REQUIREMENTS

The contractor agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. 5323(j) and 49 C.F.R. part 661 and 2 CFR § 200.322 Domestic preferences for procurements, which provide that Federal funds may not be obligated unless all steel, iron, and manufactured products used in FTA funded projects are produced in the United States, unless a waiver has been granted by FTA or the product is subject to a general waiver. General waivers are listed in 49 C.F.R. § 661.7.

Build America, Buy America Act. Construction materials used in the Project are subject to the domestic preference requirement of the Build America, Buy America Act, Pub. L. 117-58, div. G, tit. IX, §§ 70911 – 70927 (2021), as implemented by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s “Buy America Preferences for Infrastructure Projects,” 2 CFR Part 184. The Recipient acknowledges that this agreement is neither a waiver of § 70914(a) nor a finding under § 70914(b). In accordance with 2 CFR § 184.2(a), the Recipient shall apply the standards of 49 CFR Part 661 to iron, steel, and manufactured products.

Separate requirements for rolling stock are set out at 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C), 49 U.S.C. § 5323(u) and 49 C.F.R. § 661.11. Domestic preferences for procurements

The bidder or offeror must submit to the Agency the appropriate Buy America certification. Bids or offers that are not accompanied by a completed Buy America certification will be rejected as nonresponsive. For more information, please see the FTA’s Buy America webpage at: https://www.transit.dot.gov/buyamerica

CARGO PREFERENCE REQUIREMENTS

The contractor agrees:
a. to use privately owned United States-Flag commercial vessels to ship at least 50 percent of any equipment, materials or commodities procured, contracted for or otherwise obtained with funds granted, guaranteed, loaned, or advanced by the U.S. Government under this agreement, and which may be transported by ocean vessel, shall be transported on privately owned United Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

7 Jan 26
States-flag commercial vessels, if available. 46 U.S.C. § 55305, and U.S. Maritime Administration regulations, “Cargo Preference – U.S.-Flag Vessels,” 46 CFR Part 381.

b. to furnish within 20 days following the date of loading for shipments originating within the United States or within 30 working days following the date of loading for shipments originating outside the United States, a legible copy of a rated, ‘on-board’ commercial ocean bill-of-lading in English for each shipment of cargo described in 46 CFR § 381.7(a)(1) shall be furnished to both the recipient (through the prime contractor in the case of subcontractor bills-of-lading) and to the Division of National Cargo, Office of Market Development, Maritime Administration, Washington, DC 20590; and

c. to include these requirements in all subcontracts issued pursuant to this contract when the subcontract may involve the transport of equipment, material, or commodities by ocean vessel.

CHANGES TO FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS

Federal requirements that apply to the Recipient or the Award, the accompanying Underlying Agreement, and any Amendments thereto may change due to changes in federal law, regulation, other requirements, or guidance, or changes in the Recipient’s Underlying Agreement including any information incorporated by reference and made part of that Underlying Agreement; and

Applicable changes to those federal requirements will apply to each Third-Party Agreement and parties thereto at any tier.

CHARTER SERVICE

The contractor agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. 5323(d), 5323(r), and 49 C.F.R. part 604, which provides that Recipients and subrecipients of FTA assistance are prohibited from providing charter service using federally funded equipment or facilities if there is at least one private charter operator willing and able to provide the service, except as permitted under:

1. Federal transit laws, specifically 49 U.S.C. § 5323(d);

2. FTA regulations, “Charter Service,” 49 C.F.R. part 604;

3. Any other federal Charter Service regulations; or

4. Federal guidance, except as FTA determines otherwise in writing.

The contractor agrees that if it engages in a pattern of violations of FTA’s Charter Service regulations, FTA may require corrective measures or impose remedies on it. These corrective measures and remedies may include:

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

8 Jan 26

1. Barring it or any subcontractor operating public transportation under its Award that has provided prohibited charter service from receiving federal assistance from FTA;

2. Withholding an amount of federal assistance as provided by Appendix D to part 604 of FTA’s Charter Service regulations; or

3. Any other appropriate remedy that may apply.

The contractor should also include the substance of this clause in each subcontract that may involve operating public transit services.

CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS AND REGULATIONS

The following Federal Civil Rights laws and regulations apply to all contracts.

The Contractor and any subcontractor agree to comply with all the requirements prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Action of 1964, as amended 52 U.S.C 2000d, and U.S. DOT regulation “Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation – Effectuation of the Title VI of the Civil rights Act, “49 C.F. R. Part 21 and any implementing requirement FTA may issue.

1 Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Requirements. These include, but are not limited to:

a) Nondiscrimination in Federal Public Transportation Programs. 49 U.S.C. § 5332, covering projects, programs, and activities financed under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex (including sexual orientation), disability, or age, and prohibits discrimination in employment or business opportunity.

b) Prohibition against Employment Discrimination. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” 49 CFR Part 21, and 49 U.S.C. § 5332, prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

2 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. and implementing Federal regulations, “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance,” 49 C.F.R. part 25 prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex.

3 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age. The “Age Discrimination Act of 1975,” as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq., and Department of Health and Human Services implementing regulations, “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance,” 45 C.F.R. part 90, prohibit discrimination by participants in federally assisted programs against individuals on the basis of age. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Equal Employment Opportunity Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

9 Jan 26
Commission (EEOC) implementing regulations, “Age Discrimination in Employment Act,” 29 C.F.R. part 1625, also prohibit employment discrimination against individuals age 40 and over on the basis of age.

4 Federal Protections for Individuals with Disabilities. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in programs, activities, and services, and imposes specific requirements on public and private entities. Third party contractors must comply with their responsibilities under Titles I, II, III, IV, and V of the ADA in employment, public services, public accommodations, telecommunications, and other provisions, many of which are subject to regulations issued by other Federal agencies.

Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity
The Agency is an Equal Opportunity Employer. As such, the Agency agrees to comply with all applicable Federal civil rights laws and implementing regulations. Apart from inconsistent requirements imposed by Federal laws or regulations, the Agency agrees to comply with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. § 5323(h) (3) by not using any Federal assistance awarded by FTA to support procurements using exclusionary or discriminatory specifications.

Under this Contract, the Contractor shall at all times comply with the following requirements and shall include these requirements in each subcontract entered into as part thereof.

1. Nondiscrimination. In accordance with Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Contractor agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or age. In addition, the Contractor agrees to comply with applicable Federal implementing regulations and other implementing requirements FTA may issue.

2. Equal Employment Opportunity. In accordance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq.; and Federal transit laws at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable equal employment opportunity requirements, without regard to their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex (including sexual orientation). In addition, the Contractor agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.

3. Age. In accordance with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621- 634, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (U.S. EEOC) regulations, “Age Discrimination in Employment Act,” 29 C.F.R. part 1625, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq., U.S. Health and Human Services regulations, “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance,” 45 C.F.R. part 90, and Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Contractor agrees to refrain from discrimination against present and prospective employees for reason of age. In addition, the Contractor agrees to comply with any Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

10 Jan 26
Implementing requirements FTA may issue.

4. Disabilities. In accordance with section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 4151 et seq., and Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Contractor agrees that it will not discriminate against individuals on the basis of disability. In addition, the Contractor agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.

5. Federal Law and Public Policy Requirements. The Contractor shall ensure that Federal funding is expended in full accordance with the U.S. Constitution, Federal Law, and statutory and public policy requirements: including, but not limited to, those protecting free speech, religious liberty, public welfare, the environment, and prohibiting discrimination.

CLEAN AIR ACT AND FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT

The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. § 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to FTA and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency. The following applies for contracts of amounts in excess of $150,000:

Clean Air Act

(1) The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.

(2) The contractor agrees to report each violation to the Agency and understands and agrees that the Agency will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

(3) The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.

Federal Water Pollution Control Act

(1) The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

11 Jan 26
amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

(2) The contractor agrees to report each violation to the Agency and understands and agrees that the Agency will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

(3) The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.”

CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT

a. Applicability: This requirement applies to all FTA grant and cooperative agreement programs.
b. Where applicable (see 40 U.S.C. § 3701), all contracts awarded by the non-Federal entity in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. §§ 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations at 29 C.F.R. Part 5. See 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix II. c. Under 40 U.S.C. § 3702, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week.
d. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. § 3704 are applicable to construction work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. e. The regulation at 29 C.F.R. § 5.5(b) provides the required contract clause concerning compliance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act:

Compliance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act.

(1) Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one- half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

12 Jan 26
(2) Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this section the contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this section, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this section. (3) Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The agency shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (2) of this section. (4) Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraph (1) through (4) of this section and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this section.”

DAVIS BACON ACT AND COPELAND ANTI-KICKBACK ACT

For all prime construction, alteration or repair contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by FTA, the Contractor shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act.

Under 49 U.S.C. § 5333(a), prevailing wage protections apply to laborers and mechanics employed on FTA assisted construction, alteration, or repair projects. The Contractor will comply with the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 3141-3144, and 3146-3148 as supplemented by DOL regulations at 29 C.F.R. part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction.” In accordance with the statute, the Contractor shall pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, the Contractor agrees to pay wages not less than once a week. The Contractor shall also comply with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145), as supplemented by DOL regulations at 29 C.F.R. part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in part by Loans or Grants from the United States.” The Contractor is prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

13 Jan 26
of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled.

DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION

The Contractor shall comply and facilitate compliance with U.S. DOT regulations, “Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment,” 2 C.F.R. part 1200, which adopts and supplements the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB) “Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement),” 2 C.F.R. part 180. These provisions apply to each contract at any tier of $25,000 or more, and to each contract at any tier for a federally required audit (irrespective of the contract amount), and to each contract at any tier that must be approved by an FTA official irrespective of the contract amount. As such, the Contractor shall verify that its principals, affiliates, and subcontractors are eligible to participate in this federally funded contract and are not presently declared by any Federal department or agency to be:

a) Debarred from participation in any federally assisted Award; b) Suspended from participation in any federally assisted Award; c) Proposed for debarment from participation in any federally assisted Award; d) Declared ineligible to participate in any federally assisted Award; e) Voluntarily excluded from participation in any federally assisted Award; or f) Disqualified from participation in any federally assisted Award.

By signing and submitting its bid or proposal, the bidder or proposer certifies as follows:

The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact relied upon by the AGENCY. If it is later determined by the AGENCY that the bidder or proposer knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to remedies available to the AGENCY, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. The bidder or proposer agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 C.F.R. part 180, subpart C, as supplemented by 2 C.F.R. part 1200, while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The bidder or proposer further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions.

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE)
(Does not apply to projects fully funded by the Tribal Transportation Program (TTP).)

It is the policy of the Agency and the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”) that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (“DBE’s”), as defined herein and in the Federal regulations Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

14 Jan 26
published at 49 C.F.R. part 26, shall have an equal opportunity to participate in DOT-assisted contracts.

The contractor or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 C.F.R. part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts.

Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the Agency deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to:

(1) Withholding monthly progress payments;
(2) Assessing sanctions;
(3) Liquidated damages; and/or
(4) Disqualifying the contractor from future bidding as non-responsible. 49 C.F.R. § 26.13(b).

Prime contractors are required to pay subcontractors for satisfactory performance of their contracts no later than 30 days from receipt of each payment the Agency makes to the prime contractor. 49 C.F.R. § 26.29(a).

Finally, for contracts with defined DBE contract goals, the contractor shall utilize the specific DBEs listed unless the contractor obtains the Agency’s written consent; and that, unless the Agency’s consent is provided, the contractor shall not be entitled to any payment for work or material unless it is performed or supplied by the listed DBE. 49 C.F.R. § 26.53(f) (1).

DOMESTIC PREFERENCES FOR PROCUREMENTS.

(a) The recipient or subrecipient should, to the greatest extent practicable and consistent with law, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards, contracts, and purchase orders under Federal awards. (b) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States.
(2) “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

15 Jan 26
(c) Federal agencies providing Federal financial assistance for infrastructure projects must implement the Buy America preferences set forth in 2 CFR 184.

ENERGY CONSERVATION

The contractor agrees to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency, which are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C.§ 6201).

FLY AMERICA

a) Definitions. As used in this clause—

1) “International air transportation” means transportation by air between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States or between two places both of which are outside the United States.
2) “United States” means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas. 3) “U.S.-flag air carrier” means an air carrier holding a certificate under 49 U.S.C.

Chapter 411.

b) When Federal funds are used to fund travel, Section 5 of the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 (49 U.S.C. 40118) (Fly America Act) requires contractors, Agencys, and others use U.S.-flag air carriers for U.S.

Government-financed international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property, to the extent that service by those carriers is available. It requires the Comptroller General of the United States, in the absence of satisfactory proof of the necessity for foreign-flag air transportation, to disallow expenditures from funds, appropriated or otherwise established for the account of the United States, for international air transportation secured aboard a foreign-flag air carrier if a U.S.-flag air carrier is available to provide such services.
c) If available, the Contractor, in performing work under this contract, shall use U.S.-flag carriers for international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property.
d) In the event that the Contractor selects a carrier other than a U.S.-flag air carrier for international air transportation, the Contractor shall include a statement on vouchers involving such transportation essentially as follows:

Statement of Unavailability of U.S.-Flag Air Carriers
International air transportation of persons (and their personal effects) or property by U.S.-flag air carrier was not available or it was necessary to use foreign-flag air carrier service for the following reasons. See FAR § 47.403. [State reasons]:

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

16 Jan 26

e) Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in each subcontract or purchase under this contract that may involve international air transportation.

INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) TERMS

The provisions within include, in part, certain Standard Terms and Conditions required under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR § 200), whether or not expressly set forth in the preceding contract provisions.

All contractual provisions required by DOT, detailed in 2 CFR § 200 or as amended by 2 CFR § 1201, or the most recent version of FTA Circular 4220.1 are hereby incorporated by reference.

Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, all mandated terms shall be deemed to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this Contract. The Contractor shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any request which would cause a violation of the FTA terms and conditions.

NO GOVERNMENT OBLIGATION TO THIRD PARTIES

The Recipient and Contractor acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding any concurrence by the Federal Government in or approval of the solicitation or award of the underlying Contract, absent the express written consent by the Federal Government, the Federal Government is not a party to this Contract and shall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to the Recipient, Contractor or any other party (whether or not a party to that contract) pertaining to any matter resulting from the underlying Contract. The Contractor agrees to include the above clause in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by the FTA. It is further agreed that the clause shall not be modified, except to identify the subcontractor who will be subject to its provisions.

NOTICE TO FTA AND U.S. DOT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF INFORMATION

RELATED TO FRAUD, WASTE, ABUSE, OR OTHER LEGAL MATTERS

If a current or prospective legal matter that may affect the Federal Government emerges, the Recipient must promptly notify the FTA Chief Counsel and FTA Regional Counsel for the Region in which the Recipient is located. The Recipient must include a similar notification requirement in its Third-Party Agreements and must require each Third-Party Participant to include an equivalent provision in its subagreements at every tier, for any agreement that is a “covered transaction” according to 2 C.F.R. §§ 180.220 and 1200.220.

(1) The types of legal matters that require notification include, but are not limited to, a major dispute, breach, default, litigation, or naming the Federal Government as a party to litigation or Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

17 Jan 26
a legal disagreement in any forum for any reason.

(2) Matters that may affect the Federal Government include, but are not limited to, the Federal Government’s interests in the Award, the accompanying Underlying Agreement, and any Amendments thereto, or the Federal Government’s administration or enforcement of federal laws, regulations, and requirements.

(3) The Recipient must promptly notify the U.S. DOT Inspector General in addition to the FTA Chief Counsel or Regional Counsel for the Region in which the Recipient is located, if the Recipient has knowledge of potential fraud, waste, or abuse occurring on a Project receiving assistance from FTA. The notification provision applies if a person has or may have submitted a false claim under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., or has or may have committed a criminal or civil violation of law pertaining to such matters as fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, gratuity, or similar misconduct. This responsibility occurs whether the Project is subject to this Agreement or another agreement between the Recipient and FTA, or an agreement involving a principal, officer, employee, agent, or Third Party Participant of the Recipient. It also applies to subcontractors at any tier. Knowledge, as used in this paragraph, includes, but is not limited to, knowledge of a criminal or civil investigation by a Federal, state, or local law enforcement or other investigative agency, a criminal indictment or civil complaint, or probable cause that could support a criminal indictment, or any other credible information in the possession of the Recipient.

PATENT RIGHTS AND RIGHTS IN DATA

Intellectual Property Rights
This Project is funded through a Federal award with FTA for experimental, developmental, or research work purposes. As such, certain Patent Rights and Data Rights apply to all subject data first produced in the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall grant the Agency intellectual property access and licenses deemed necessary for the work performed under this Contract and in accordance with the requirements of 37 C.F.R. part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by FTA or U.S. DOT.

The terms of an intellectual property agreement and software license rights will be finalized prior to execution of this Contract and shall, at a minimum, include the following restrictions:

Except for its own internal use, the Contractor may not publish or reproduce subject data in whole or in part, or in any manner or form, nor may the Contractor authorize others to do so, without the written consent of FTA, until such time as FTA may have either released or approved the release of such data to the public. This restriction on publication, however, does not apply to any contract with an academic institution.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

18 Jan 26
For purposes of this Contract, the term “subject data” means recorded information whether or not copyrighted, and that is delivered or specified to be delivered as required by the Contract.

Examples of “subject data” include, but are not limited to computer software, standards, specifications, engineering drawings and associated lists, process sheets, manuals, technical reports, catalog item identifications, and related information, but do not include financial reports, cost analyses, or other similar information used for performance or administration of the Contract.

1. The Federal Government reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use for “Federal Government Purposes,” any subject data or copyright described below. For “Federal Government Purposes,” means use only for the direct purposes of the Federal Government. Without the copyright owner’s consent, the Federal Government may not extend its Federal license to any other party.

a. Any subject data developed under the Contract, whether or not a copyright has been obtained; and

b. Any rights of copyright purchased by the Contractor using Federal assistance in whole or in part by the FTA.

2. Unless FTA determines otherwise, the Contractor performing experimental, developmental, or research work required as part of this Contract agrees to permit FTA to make available to the public, either FTA’s license in the copyright to any subject data developed in the course of the Contract, or a copy of the subject data first produced under the Contract for which a copyright has not been obtained. If the experimental, developmental, or research work, which is the subject of this Contract, is not completed for any reason whatsoever, all data developed under the Contract shall become subject data as defined herein and shall be delivered as the Federal Government may direct.

3. Unless prohibited by state law, upon request by the Federal Government, the Contractor agrees to indemnify, save, and hold harmless the Federal Government, its officers, agents, and employees acting within the scope of their official duties against any liability, including costs and expenses, resulting from any willful or intentional violation by the Contractor of proprietary rights, copyrights, or right of privacy, arising out of the publication, translation, reproduction, delivery, use, or disposition of any data furnished under that contract. The Contractor shall not be required to indemnify the Federal Government for any such liability arising out of the wrongful act of any employee, official, or agents of the Federal Government.

4. Nothing contained in this clause on rights in data shall imply a license to the Federal Government under any patent or be construed as affecting the scope of any license or other right otherwise granted to the Federal Government under any patent.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

19 Jan 26

5. Data developed by the Contractor and financed entirely without using Federal assistance provided by the Federal Government that has been incorporated into work required by the underlying Contract is exempt from the requirements herein, provided that the Contractor identifies those data in writing at the time of delivery of the Contract work.

6. The Contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract for experimental, developmental, or research work financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance.

PRE-AWARD AND POST-DELIVERY AUDITS OF ROLLING STOCK PURCHASES

(Does not apply to projects fully funded by the Tribal Transportation Program (TTP).)

The Contractor agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. § 5323(m) and FTA's implementing regulation at 49 C.F.R. part 663. The Contractor shall comply with the Buy America certification(s) submitted with its proposal/bid. The Contractor agrees to participate and cooperate in any pre- award and post-delivery audits performed pursuant to 49 C.F.R. part 663 and related FTA guidance.

PROGRAM FRAUD AND FALSE OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS AND

RELATED ACTS

The Contractor acknowledges that the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq. and U.S. DOT regulations, "Program Fraud Civil Remedies," 49 C.F.R. part 31, apply to its actions pertaining to this Project. Upon execution of the underlying contract, the Contractor certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of any statement it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made, pertaining to the underlying contract or the FTA assisted project for which this contract work is being performed.

In addition to other penalties that may be applicable, the Contractor further acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification, the Federal Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 on the Contractor to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate.

The Contractor also acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification to the Federal Government under a contract connected with a project that is financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance originally awarded by FTA under the authority of 49 U.S.C. chapter 53, the Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 49 U.S.C. § 5323(l) on the Contractor, to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

20 Jan 26
The Contractor agrees to include the above two clauses in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. It is further agreed that the clauses shall not be modified, except to identify the subcontractor who will be subject to the provisions.

PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO
SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT.
a) Recipients and subrecipients are prohibited from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to:
1) Procure or obtain;
2) Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or
3) Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).
(i) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).
(ii) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment.
(iii) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. b) In implementing the prohibition under Public Law 115-232, section 889, subsection (f), paragraph (1), heads of executive agencies administering loan, grant, or subsidy programs shall prioritize available funding and technical support to assist affected businesses, institutions and organizations as is reasonably necessary for those affected entities to transition from covered communications equipment and services, to procure replacement equipment and services, and to ensure that communications service to users and customers is sustained.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

21 Jan 26
c) See Public Law 115-232, section 889 for additional information.

d) See also § 200.471.

PROMPT PAYMENT

(Does not apply to projects fully funded by the Tribal Transportation Program (TTP).)

The contractor is required to pay its subcontractors performing work related to this contract for satisfactory performance of that work no later than 30 days after the contractor’s receipt of payment for that work. In addition, the contractor is required to return any retainage payments to those subcontractors within 30 days after the subcontractor's work related to this contract is satisfactorily completed.

The contractor must promptly notify the Agency, whenever a DBE subcontractor performing work related to this contract is terminated or fails to complete its work and must make good faith efforts to engage another DBE subcontractor to perform at least the same amount of work. The contractor may not terminate any DBE subcontractor and perform that work through its own forces or those of an affiliate without prior written consent of the Agency.

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE ARRANGEMENTS

The Contractor agrees to comply with the following employee protective arrangements of 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b):

1. U.S. DOL Certification. Under this Contract or any Amendments thereto that involve public transportation operations that are supported with federal assistance, a certification issued by U.S. DOL is a condition of the Contract.

2. Special Warranty. When the Contract involves public transportation operations and is supported with federal assistance appropriated or made available for 49 U.S.C. § 5311, U.S.

DOL will provide a Special Warranty for its Award, including its Award of federal assistance under the Tribal Transit Program. The U.S. DOL Special Warranty is a condition of the Contract.

3. Special Arrangements. The conditions of 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b) do not apply to Contractors providing public transportation operations pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 5310. FTA reserves the right to make case-by-case determinations of the applicability of 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b) for all transfers of funding authorized under title 23, United States Code (flex funds), and make other exceptions as it deems appropriate, and, in those instances, any special Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

22 Jan 26
arrangements required by FTA will be incorporated herein as required.

RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING

Conditions on use of funds.
(a) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (b) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a certification, that the person has not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section. (c) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a disclosure form if such person has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds (to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with appropriated funds.
(d) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a statement, whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
(e) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a disclosure form if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.

Certification and disclosure.
(a) Each person shall file a certification, and a disclosure form, if required, with each submission that initiates agency consideration of such person for:
(1) Award of a Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement exceeding $100,000; or (2) An award of a Federal loan or a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000.
(b) Each person shall file a certification, and a disclosure form, if required, upon receipt by such person of:

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

23 Jan 26
(1) A Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement exceeding $100,000; or (2) A Federal loan or a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000,
Unless such person previously filed a certification, and a disclosure form, if required, under paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Each person shall file a disclosure form at the end of each calendar quarter in which there occurs any event that requires disclosure or that materially affects the accuracy of the information contained in any disclosure form previously filed by such person under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. An event that materially affects the accuracy of the information reported includes:
(1) A cumulative increase of $25,000 or more in the amount paid or expected to be paid for influencing or attempting to influence a covered Federal action; or (2) A change in the person(s) or individual(s) influencing or attempting to influence a covered Federal action; or,
(3) A change in the officer(s), employee(s), or Member(s) contacted to influence or attempt to influence a covered Federal action.
(d) Any person who requests or receives from a person referred to in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section:
(1) A subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any tier under a Federal contract; (2) A subgrant, contract, or subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any tier under a Federal grant;
(3) A contract or subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any tier under a Federal loan exceeding $150,000; or,
(4) A contract or subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any tier under a Federal cooperative agreement,
Shall file a certification, and a disclosure form, if required, to the next tier above. (e) All disclosure forms, but not certifications, shall be forwarded from tier to tier until received by the person referred to in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. That person shall forward all disclosure forms to the agency.
(f) Any certification or disclosure form filed under paragraph (e) of this section shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which all receiving tiers shall rely. All liability arising from an erroneous representation shall be borne solely by the tier filing that representation and shall not be shared by any tier to which the erroneous representation is forwarded.

Submitting an erroneous certification or disclosure constitutes a failure to file the required certification or disclosure, respectively. If a person fails to file a required certification or disclosure, the United States may pursue all available remedies, including those authorized by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code.
(g) For awards and commitments in process prior to December 23, 1989, but not made before that date, certifications shall be required at award or commitment, covering activities occurring between December 23, 1989, and the date of award or commitment. However, for awards and commitments in process prior to the December 23, 1989 effective date of these provisions, but not made before December 23, 1989, disclosure forms shall not be required at time of award or commitment but shall be filed within 30 days.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

24 Jan 26
(h) No reporting is required for an activity paid for with appropriated funds if that activity is allowable under either subpart B or C.

SAFE OPERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Seat Belt Use
The Contractor is encouraged to adopt and promote on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees and other personnel that operate company-owned vehicles, company rented vehicles, or personally operated vehicles. The terms “company-owned” and “company-leased” refer to vehicles owned or leased either by the Contractor or Agency.

Distracted Driving
The Contractor agrees to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while using an electronic device supplied by an employer, and driving a vehicle the driver owns or rents, a vehicle Contactor owns, leases, or rents, or a privately-owned vehicle when on official business in connection with the work performed under this Contract.

SCHOOL BUS OPERATIONS

The contractor agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. 5323(f), and 49 C.F.R. part 604, and not engage in school bus operations using federally funded equipment or facilities in competition with private operators of school buses, except as permitted under:

1. Federal transit laws, specifically 49 U.S.C. § 5323(f);

2. FTA regulations, “School Bus Operations,” 49 C.F.R. part 605;

3. Any other Federal School Bus regulations; or

4. Federal guidance, except as FTA determines otherwise in writing.

If Contractor violates this School Bus Agreement, FTA may:

1. Bar the Contractor from receiving Federal assistance for public transportation; or

2. Require the contractor to take such remedial measures as FTA considers appropriate.

When operating exclusive school bus service under an allowable exemption, the contractor may not use federally funded equipment, vehicles, or facilities.

The Contractor should include the substance of this clause in each subcontract or purchase under this contract that may operate public transportation services.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

25 Jan 26

SEISMIC SAFETY

The contractor agrees that any new building or addition to an existing building will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards for Seismic Safety required in Department of Transportation (DOT) Seismic Safety Regulations 49 C.F.R. part 41 and will certify to compliance to the extent required by the regulation. The contractor also agrees to ensure that all work performed under this contract, including work performed by a subcontractor, is in compliance with the standards required by the Seismic Safety regulations and the certification of compliance issued on the project.

SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD

Contracts for more than the simplified acquisition threshold, which is the inflation adjusted amount determined by the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) as authorized by 41 U.S.C. § 1908, or otherwise set by law, must address administrative, contractual, or legal remedies in instances where contractors violate or breach contract terms, and provide for such sanctions and penalties as appropriate. (Note that the simplified acquisition threshold determines the procurement procedures that must be employed pursuant to 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.317–200.327. The simplified acquisition threshold does not exempt a procurement from other eligibility or processes requirements that may apply. For example, Buy America’s eligibility and process requirements apply to any procurement in excess of $150,000. 49 U.S.C. § 5323(j)(13).

SOLID WASTES (RECOVERED MATERIALS)

A Recipient that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR Part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.

SPECIAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STATES

Applies to States –
Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

26 Jan 26
a. To the extent required under federal law, the State, as the Recipient, agrees to provide the following information about federal assistance awarded for its State Program, Project, or related activities:

(1) The Identification of FTA as the federal agency providing the federal assistance for a State Program or Project;
(2) The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number of the program from which the federal assistance for a State Program or Project is authorized; and (3) The amount of federal assistance FTA has provided for a State Program or Project.

b. Documents - The State agrees to provide the information required under this provision in the following documents:

(1) applications for federal assistance,
(2) requests for proposals or solicitations,
(3) forms,
(4) notifications,
(5) press releases, and
(6) other publications.

SUBSTANCE ABUSE REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor agrees to establish and implement a drug and alcohol testing program that complies with 49 C.F.R. part 655, produce any documentation necessary to establish its compliance with part 655, and permit any authorized representative of the United States Department of Transportation or its operating administrations, the State Oversight Agency, or Agency, to inspect the facilities and records associated with the implementation of the drug and alcohol testing program as required under 49 C.F.R. part 655 and review the testing process. The Contractor agrees further to certify annually its compliance with part 655 and to submit the Management Information System (MIS) reports to the Agency.

TERMINATION

Termination for Convenience (General Provision)
The Agency may terminate this contract, in whole or in part, at any time by written notice to the Contractor when it is in the Agency’s best interest. The Contractor shall be paid its costs, including contract close-out costs, and profit on work performed up to the time of termination.

The Contractor shall promptly submit its termination claim to Agency to be paid the Contractor.

If the Contractor has any property in its possession belonging to Agency, the Contractor will account for the same, and dispose of it in the manner Agency directs.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

27 Jan 26

Termination for Default [Breach or Cause] (General Provision) If the Contractor does not deliver supplies in accordance with the contract delivery schedule, or if the contract is for services, the Contractor fails to perform in the manner called for in the contract, or if the Contractor fails to comply with any other provisions of the contract, the Agency may terminate this contract for default. Termination shall be effected by serving a Notice of Termination on the Contractor setting forth the manner in which the Contractor is in default. The Contractor will be paid only the contract price for supplies delivered and accepted, or services performed in accordance with the manner of performance set forth in the contract.

If it is later determined by the Agency that the Contractor had an excusable reason for not performing, such as a strike, fire, or flood, events which are not the fault of or are beyond the control of the Contractor, the Agency, after setting up a new delivery of performance schedule, may allow the Contractor to continue work, or treat the termination as a Termination for Convenience.

Opportunity to Cure (General Provision)
The Agency, in its sole discretion may, in the case of a termination for breach or default, allow the Contractor [an appropriately short period of time] in which to cure the defect. In such case, the Notice of Termination will state the time period in which cure is permitted and other appropriate conditions.

If Contractor fails to remedy to Agency's satisfaction the breach or default of any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Contract within [10 days] after receipt by Contractor of written notice from Agency setting forth the nature of said breach or default, Agency shall have the right to terminate the contract without any further obligation to Contractor. Any such termination for default shall not in any way operate to preclude Agency from also pursuing all available remedies against Contractor and its sureties for said breach or default.

Waiver of Remedies for any Breach
In the event that Agency elects to waive its remedies for any breach by Contractor of any covenant, term or condition of this contract, such waiver by Agency shall not limit Agency’s remedies for any succeeding breach of that or of any other covenant, term, or condition of this contract.

Termination for Convenience (Professional or Transit Service Contracts) The Agency, by written notice, may terminate this contract, in whole or in part, when it is in the Agency’s interest. If this contract is terminated, the Agency shall be liable only for payment under the payment provisions of this contract for services rendered before the effective date of termination.

Termination for Default (Supplies and Service)
If the Contractor fails to deliver supplies or to perform the services within the time specified in this contract or any extension, or if the Contractor fails to comply with any other provisions of this contract, the Agency may terminate this contract for default. The Agency shall terminate by Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

28 Jan 26
delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the nature of the default. The Contractor will only be paid the contract price for supplies delivered and accepted, or services performed in accordance with the manner or performance set forth in this contract.

If, after termination for failure to fulfill contract obligations, it is determined that the Contractor was not in default, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the termination had been issued for the convenience of the Agency.

Termination for Default (Transportation Services)
If the Contractor fails to pick up the commodities or to perform the services, including delivery services, within the time specified in this contract or any extension, or if the Contractor fails to comply with any other provisions of this contract, the Agency may terminate this contract for default. The Agency shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the nature of default. The Contractor will only be paid the contract price for services performed in accordance with the manner of performance set forth in this contract.

If this contract is terminated while the Contractor has possession of Agency goods, the Contractor shall, upon direction of the Agency, protect and preserve the goods until surrendered to the Agency or its agent. The Contractor and Agency shall agree on payment for the preservation and protection of goods. Failure to agree on an amount will be resolved under the Dispute clause.

If, after termination for failure to fulfill contract obligations, it is determined that the Contractor was not in default, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the termination had been issued for the convenience of the Agency.

Termination for Default (Construction)
If the Contractor refuses or fails to prosecute the work or any separable part, with the diligence that will ensure its completion within the time specified in this contract or any extension or fails to complete the work within this time, or if the Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of this contract, Agency may terminate this contract for default. The Agency shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the nature of the default. In this event, the Agency may take over the work and compete it by contract or otherwise, and may take possession of and use any materials, appliances, and plant on the work site necessary for completing the work. The Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for any damage to the Agency resulting from the Contractor's refusal or failure to complete the work within specified time, whether or not the Contractor's right to proceed with the work is terminated. This liability includes any increased costs incurred by the Agency in completing the work.

The Contractor's right to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall the Contractor be charged with damages under this clause if:

1. The delay in completing the work arises from unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. Examples of such causes include:

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

29 Jan 26
acts of God, acts of Agency, acts of another contractor in the performance of a contract with Agency, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes; and

2. The Contractor, within [10] days from the beginning of any delay, notifies Agency in writing of the causes of delay. If, in the judgment of Agency, the delay is excusable, the time for completing the work shall be extended. The judgment of Agency shall be final and conclusive for the parties, but subject to appeal under the Disputes clause(s) of this contract.

3. If, after termination of the Contractor's right to proceed, it is determined that the Contractor was not in default, or that the delay was excusable, the rights and obligations of the parties will be the same as if the termination had been issued for the convenience of Agency.

Termination for Convenience or Default (Architect and Engineering) The Agency may terminate this contract in whole or in part, for the Agency’s convenience or because of the failure of the Contractor to fulfill the contract obligations. The Agency shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the nature, extent, and effective date of the termination. Upon receipt of the notice, the Contractor shall (1) immediately discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver to the Agency ‘s Contracting Officer all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and other information and materials accumulated in performing this contract, whether completed or in process. Agency has a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, all such data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and other information and materials.

If the termination is for the convenience of the Agency, the Agency’s Contracting Officer shall make an equitable adjustment in the contract price but shall allow no anticipated profit on unperformed services.

If the termination is for failure of the Contractor to fulfill the contract obligations, the Agency may complete the work by contact or otherwise and the Contractor shall be liable for any additional cost incurred by the Agency.

If, after termination for failure to fulfill contract obligations, it is determined that the Contractor was not in default, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the termination had been issued for the convenience of Agency.

Termination for Convenience or Default (Cost-Type Contracts) The Agency may terminate this contract, or any portion of it, by serving a Notice of Termination on the Contractor. The notice shall state whether the termination is for convenience of Agency or for the default of the Contractor. If the termination is for default, the notice shall state the manner in which the Contractor has failed to perform the requirements of the contract. The Contractor shall account for any property in its possession paid for from funds received from the Agency, or property supplied to the Contractor by the Agency. If the termination is for default, the Agency may fix the fee, if the contract provides for a fee, to be paid the Contractor Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

30 Jan 26
in proportion to the value, if any, of work performed up to the time of termination. The Contractor shall promptly submit its termination claim to the Agency and the parties shall negotiate the termination settlement to be paid the Contractor.

If the termination is for the convenience of Agency, the Contractor shall be paid its contract close-out costs, and a fee, if the contract provided for payment of a fee, in proportion to the work performed up to the time of termination.

If, after serving a Notice of Termination for Default, the Agency determines that the Contractor has an excusable reason for not performing, the Agency, after setting up a new work schedule, may allow the Contractor to continue work, or treat the termination as a Termination for Convenience.

VETERANS HIRING PREFERENCE

Veterans Employment - Construction contracts of Federal financial assistance shall ensure that contractors working on a capital project funded using such assistance give a hiring preference, to the extent practicable, to veterans (as defined in section 2108 of title 5) who have the requisite skills and abilities to perform the construction work required under the contract. This subsection shall not be understood, construed or enforced in any manner that would require an employer to give a preference to any veteran over any equally qualified applicant who is a member of any racial or ethnic minority, female, an individual with a disability, or a former employee.

VIOLATION AND BREACH OF CONTRACT

Disputes:

Disputes arising in the performance of this Contract that are not resolved by agreement of the parties shall be decided in writing by the authorized representative of the agency. This decision shall be final and conclusive unless within [10] days from the date of receipt of its copy, the Contractor mails or otherwise furnishes a written appeal to the agencies authorized representative. In connection with any such appeal, the Contractor shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of its position. The decision of the agencies authorized representative shall be binding upon the Contractor and the Contractor shall abide be the decision.

Performance during Dispute:

Unless otherwise directed by the agencies authorized representative, contractor shall continue performance under this contract while matters in dispute are being resolved.

Claims for Damages:

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

31 Jan 26
Should either party to the contract suffer injury or damage to person or property because of any act or omission of the party or of any of his employees, agents or others for whose acts he is legally liable, a claim for damages therefore shall be made in writing to such other party within a reasonable time after the first observance of such injury or damage.

Remedies:

Unless this contract provides otherwise, all claims, counterclaims, disputes and other matters in question between the agencies authorized representative and contractor arising out of or relating to this agreement or its breach will be decided by arbitrati on if the parties mutually agree, or in a court of competent jurisdiction within the State in which the Agency is located.

Rights and Remedies:

Duties and obligations imposed by the contract documents and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to and not a limitation of any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. No action or failure to act by the Agency or contractor shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under the contract, nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of or acquiescence in any breach thereunder, except as may be specifically agreed in writing.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

32 Jan 26

OTHER RECOMMENDED CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

CONFORMANCE WITH ITS NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) projects shall conform to the National ITS Architecture and standards pursuant to 23 CFR § 940. Conformance with the National ITS Architecture is interpreted to mean the use of the National ITS Architecture to develop a regional ITS architecture in support of integration and the subsequent adherence of all ITS projects to that regional ITS architecture. Development of the regional ITS architecture should be consistent with the transportation planning process for Statewide and Metropolitan Transportation Planning (49 CFR Part 613 and 621).

FEDERAL TAX LIABILITY AND RECENT FELONY CONVICTIONS

(1) The contractor certifies that it:
(a) Does not have any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability; and
(b) Was not convicted of the felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

If the contractor cannot so certify, the Recipient will refer the matter to FTA and not enter into any Third Party Agreement with the Third Party Participant without FTA’s written approval.

(2) Flow-Down. The Recipient agrees to require the contractor to flow this requirement down to participants at all lower tiers, without regard to the value of any subagreement.

SEVERABILITY
The Contractor agrees that if any provision of this agreement or any amendment thereto is determined to be invalid, then the remaining provisions thereof that conform to federal laws, regulations, requirements, and guidance will continue in effect.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

33 Jan 26

TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS

The contractor agrees that it and its employees that participate in the Recipient’s Award, may not:
(a) Engage in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the Recipient’s Award is in effect;
(b) Procure a commercial sex act during the period of time that the Recipient’s Award is in effect; or
(c) Use forced labor in the performance of the Recipient’s Award or subagreements thereunder.

Docusign Envelope ID: B42F1944-4EE0-80F3-8048-614462923249

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.5
File #: 0721-02 & 0214
Item ID: 2026-422

Title: Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 - Grant Authorization Contact: Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends adoption of a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit a grant application to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments 2026 Federal Funding Program under the Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program, and to execute all related grant documents and comply with timely project delivery requirements. The grant application would support the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 multi-use bike trail project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to submit a Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program grant application for the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Program and to execute all grant documents and timely project delivery requirements.

BACKGROUND
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has announced three 2026 Federal Funding Cycle Programs (Funding Programs): System Preservation Program, System Performance Program, and Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program. The three Funding Programs are open to sponsoring agencies within the six-county SACOG region. As part of the application process, a resolution is required authorizing City staff to submit applications on behalf of the City. The application process requires the City to identify priority projects for potential funding under the SACOG 2026 Federal Funding Programs. Staff has identified the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 multi-use bike trail as a strong candidate for funding through the Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program.

Phase 2 of the Dry Creek Greenway East Multi-Use Trail would extend the existing trail from its current eastern terminus at Rocky Ridge Drive in Roseville to Old Auburn Road. Upon completion, the entire Dry Creek East trail would span approximately four miles and include an underpass beneath Interstate 80, reconnecting communities in Roseville that have long been separated. At its western end, the trail would connect to the existing nine-mile Miner’s Ravine Trail, providing pedestrians and cyclists access to Amtrak’s Capitol Corridor service at Roseville Station, as well as Roseville Transit’s Downtown Transit Center and Downtown Roseville.

The Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 project is currently in the design phase. Using local funds, the City’s consultant is updating the 95 percent plans, and right-of-way offers have been made. Design and right-of-way acquisition are anticipated to be completed in 2027. The project previously received a $6.063 million Active Transportation Program Cycle 6 grant and $10,000 in early Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) funds to help construct this project. Through this application, the City will seek $6,378,715 in additional funding. If awarded, the grant, combined with the required local

transportation fund match, would fully fund the construction phase of the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total estimated cost of the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 project is $17.8 million. If the City is awarded the requested $6,378,715 through the Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program, the project’s construction phase would be fully funded through a combination of grant funding and local transportation funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Dry Creek East Phase 2 grant application meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Engelke, Associate Transportation Planner

Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Dry Creek Exhibit - Phase 2 - Vicinity Map

2. Resolution 26-175

REVIEWERS:

Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 5/12/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 5/12/2026 Jason Shykowski, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/14/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 5/18/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/20/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/22/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

DRY CREEK GREENWAY ROSEVILLE, CA
Phase 1
Trail
BEGIN PHASE 2

TRAIL PROJECT
END PHASE 2
TRAIL PROJECTRocky Ridge/
Maidu Access
S. Cirby Way
Access
N. Cirby
Way Access
Old Auburn
Road Access
Champion
Oaks Access
Linda Creek
Bridge
Strap Ravine
Bridge
W. Colonial
Pkwy Access
RockyRidge Dr
Cham
pion Oaks Dr
Old Auburn Blvd
W. Colonial Pkwy
S Cirby Way
N Cirby Way
DRY CREEK GREENWAY EAST PHASE 2 TRAIL
Description
The City of Roseville is in the final design phase of the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 trail project, a proposed Class I paved multi-use trail along Linda Creek. The first phase of this project, between Darling Way and Rocky Ridge Drive, opened on May 9, 2026. This second phase begins at Rocky Ridge Drive and extends eastwards, approximately 1.2 miles, to Old Auburn Road.

Proposed Phase 2
Class 1 Trail
N. Cirby Way
Buffered Bike Lanes
Benches &
Amenities
Concrete Paving
& Walls
Landscaping Signage
LEGEND

RESOLUTION NO. 26-175

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AUTHORIZING APPLICATIONS FOR

GRANT FUNDING FROM THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SACOG) 2026 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT CITY OF ROSEVILLE SACOG 2026 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION PRIORITIES; AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL GRANT DOCUMENTS AND

TIMELY PROJECT DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS

WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has announced three 2026 Federal Funding Cycle Programs (Funding Programs), which are open to sponsoring agencies within the six-county SACOG region: System Preservation Program, System Performance Program, and Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program; and

WHEREAS, the Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program supports projects that reduce emissions and improve air quality—such as high-capacity transit, zero-emission improvements, and programs that encourage carpooling, transit use, and other clean transportation options; and vehicles and charging infrastructure, bikeways and trails, Complete Streets, traffic flow; and

WHEREAS, eligible projects for Funding Programs must be listed in the 2025 Blueprint or fit within 2025 Blueprint lump-sum project categories including but not limited to road maintenance and reconstruction, transit vehicle replacements, operational improvements, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and bicycle and pedestrian investments; and

WHEREAS, SACOG limits Funding Programs grant applications to no more than three applications per sponsoring agency for any one of the three different Funding Programs to SACOG, up to a maximum of nine total applications per sponsoring agency; and

WHEREAS, applicants shall affirm their commitment to delivering projects in accordance with the requirements of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program and Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program, as applicable; and

WHEREAS, grant proposals for construction work shall obligate Funding Program dollars for construction activities no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-29; and

WHEREAS, SACOG will not provide additional federal or state funding in the event that cost overruns are identified; and

WHEREAS, project sponsors shall commit to providing local matching dollars, typically

11.47% of the total project cost; and

WHEREAS, SACOG requires that if awarded federal funds by the SACOG Board, City of Roseville staff responsible for project delivery must attend quarterly project delivery meetings with SACOG staff to receive assistance until project closeout.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

SECTION 1. City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to committing City of Roseville to federal, state and regional funding and project delivery requirements, including but not limited to abiding by Funding Program guidelines.

SECTION 2. Acknowledges that in the event of receiving an award by the SACOG Board of Funding Program dollars, that City of Roseville will be required to abide by multiple timely use of funding requirements described in Funding Program guidelines and SACOG’s Regional Delivery Policies, including but not limited to, obligating federal funding no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-2029 for construction activities, committing to securing required local match dollars, acknowledge that SACOG does not cover cost overruns, and commits staff to attend delivery meetings until project closeout.

SECTION 3. City Manager or his designee is directed to submit the following applications for 2026 Six-County Federal Funding Cycle Program:

• Dry Creek Greenway Multi-Use Trail, Phase 2 - In Roseville, along Linda Creek:

Construct Class I bike trail from Rocky Ridge Drive to Old Auburn Way, a distance of approximately 1.4 miles.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.6
File #: 0203-01 & 0203-04
Item ID: 2026-333

Title: Disposal and Auction Services - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with J.J. Kane Associates, Inc., dba JJ Kane Auctions, on an as-needed basis utilizing Sourcewell Contract #111424-JJK. The Fleet and Purchasing/Central Stores Divisions require auction services to liquidate retired vehicles, equipment and other surplus goods that are no longer required by the City. This is a revenue-generating agreement, with the service costs paid by successful bidders. Revenue generated from the agreement is estimated at approximately $500,000 annually. Staff also requests authorization to renew the agreement three times without further City Council approval, contingent upon staff's determination that continued use of the service is in the City's best interest.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Contract Purchase Agreement (3005317) with J.J. Kane Associates, Inc., dba JJ Kane Auctions, for disposal and auction services for surplus vehicles, equipment, parts, and other items, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff also requests authorization for the City Manager or designee to execute up to three additional one- year extensions, utilizing the same Sourcewell contract without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Fleet and Purchasing/Central Stores Divisions require services to liquidate retired vehicles, equipment, and other surplus items no longer required by the City. The City will piggyback on Sourcewell Contract #111424-JJK. The term of the Sourcewell contract is scheduled to expire on January 27, 2029, and may be extended by up to three additional one-year terms.

FISCAL IMPACT
Revenue generated from the sale of surplus fleet assets will be returned to the Fleet Replacement Fund, Electric Fund, or Transit/Transportation Funds, as certain vehicles are funded directly by those programs rather than through the Fleet Replacement Internal Service Fund. Revenue generated from the sale of other surplus items will be returned to the fund that originally funded the asset.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not

subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Tiffany Valdez, Buyer

Scott Pettingell, Finance Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-172

2. Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

REVIEWERS:

Tiffany Valdez, Finance Department - Purchasing Created/Initiated - 5/5/2026 Shannon Wiest, Finance Department - Purchasing Approved - 5/14/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 5/14/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-172

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND J.J. KANE ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA JJ KANE AUCTIONS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Contract Purchase Agreement (3005317) for disposal and auction services for surplus vehicles, equipment, parts, and other items, by and between the City of Roseville and J.J. Kane Associates, Inc. dba JJ Kane Auctions, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute three (3) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317
Supplier Details:

Company JJ Kane Associates Inc dba JJ Kane Auctions
Contact Mat Smith
Address 8668 Sparling Ln
Dixon, CA 95620
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact Tiffany Valdez
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1109
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317
Agreement 3005317
Agreement Date 13-APR-2026
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 0.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier JJ Kane Associates Inc dba JJ Kane
Auctions
8668 Sparling Ln
Dixon, CA 95620
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
()
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials

SHALL PROVIDE DISPOSAL AND AUCTION SERVICES FOR SURPLUS VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, PARTS, ETC. ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED RATE SHEET UTILIZING SOURCEWELL CONTRACT #111424-JJK.

ALL WORK MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY AN AUTHORIZED MEMBER OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE'S FLEET SERVICES OR PURCHASING DIVISIONS.

PLEASE CONTACT SHANNON WIEST AT 916-746-1112 OR PETER BREVIK AT 916- 746-1754 FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 14801 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
06-May-2026 27-Jan-2029 Tiffany Valdez Phone 1-916-746-1109 Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office.

2 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

Contract Terms and Conditions

1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of Contractor's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Contractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

2. Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Contractor is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Contractor shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Contractor acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Contractor has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement.

9. All fair employment practices must be adhered to. In addition, if the project referenced on this service agreement is a Public Works project, all prevailing wage laws must be complied with. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir. ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm. In compliance with Labor Code Section 1773.2, as may be amended from time to time, Contractor shall cause a copy of this website to be posted at each jobsite, as applicable.

10. Contractor agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage.
b. Form. Contractor shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management 3 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

and the City Attorney.
c. Additional Insureds. Contractor shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Contractor. The additional insured coverage under the Contractor's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater.
d. Cancellation/Modification. Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor's work. Furthermore, Contractor shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City under this Agreement.

Additionally, Contractor shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all work performed by Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors. i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Contractor of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances, including 4 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

but not limited to the City's storm water regulations, as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement. Refer to www.roseville. ca.us/stormwater for links to more information on the City's storm water regulations.

12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e- mail delivery of a ".pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original hereof.

14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

19. Contractor/consultant's duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity's preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Contractor/consultant's participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications, if any, shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.

20. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.

21. Contractor certifies that Contractor, its employees, directors, officers, agents, 5 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension, or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency.

22. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to City elected or appointed officers totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months prior to the City decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by Contractor and/or its agent(s), Contractor is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at: https://www.roseville.ca.
us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.

23. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.

24. CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONTRACTOR and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that: (a) CONTRACTOR is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONTRACTOR is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONTRACTOR has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONTRACTOR maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONTRACTOR is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONTRACTOR actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONTRACTOR advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONTRACTOR provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONTRACTOR has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONTRACTOR set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONTRACTOR has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

25. If Contractor produces any "web content" pursuant to this Agreement, as that term is defined in section 35.104 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended, Contractor shall ensure that any such web content is in full compliance with all applicable requirements of the most current version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Code of Federal Regulations and/or California law. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, or expenses arising out of Contractor's failure to comply with such requirements. This provision shall survive expiration and/or termination of this Agreement.

The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
___________ Corporation
___________ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
6 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

N/A
N/A
N/A

X

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

___________ Sole Proprietor
City Reserves the right to withhold any payments to contractor in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.

General T&C
REV 3/16/26 JS

7 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT UNDER FORMAL BID LIMIT
General - Required Coverage:
●   GeneralLiability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ●   AutomobileLiability: $1 Million combined single limit ●   Workers'Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ●   AdditionalInsured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ●   Policiesmust be primary and non-contributory
●   A30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Insurance Verification
By signing the agreement included with this document, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required above.

A copy of your insurance certificate is not required at this time. The City may request proof of insurance at any time.

Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202

8 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005317

Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 9 Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C 5/5/2026
President
Dennis McIntyre
Jeremy Walters
4/13/2026
Assistant Secretary

4.0%

4.0%

4.0%
$100 Per Vehicle
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
Paid by seller
$100 Per Vehicle
$140 per hour
$140 per hour
$140 per hour
$95 per hour
$50 small/ $75 Large
No Charge
No ChargeStorage Fees
City of Roseville
Rate Sheet/ Sourcewell Contract #111424-JJK
Low Bed Trailer Service (Equip/Med to Large Trucks)
Surplus Personal Property (Miscellaneous)
Minor De-Logo, Decomission (no paint)
Standard Towing: Non-op units
Commission (Selling Fees)
Motor Vehicles and Off Road Vehicles (Sourcewell Agreement Pricing) Miscellaneous Property (Non-motor Off Road Vehicle) (Sourcewell Agreement Pricing) Non-running Vehicles (Sourcewell Agreement Pricing)
State of California Vehicle Safety Inspection
Transportation Charges and Other Services
Smog Service
CARB Administrative Fee
DMV Back Fees (If any)
Duplicate Title (If title is lost and we have to replace) Standard Towing: Running Vehicles (6-8 Vehicles)
Vehicle Recall (Transport to local dealer to complete)
Exempt Plates: Processing ''E" Plates
Docusign Envelope ID: C0F6BE15-246D-8F4F-8005-E48ABD5F269C

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.7
File #: 0203-13
Item ID: 2026-406

Title: 2090 Hilltop Backup Generator Replacement (RFQ 10-3444) – Contract Purchase Agreement
Contact: Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Elite Power, Inc. as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Request for Quotations No.10-3444 2090 Hilltop Backup Generator Replacement. The cost of the Agreement is $107,908. Additionally, adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the contract purchase agreement and authorizing the Public Works Director or designee to approve change order requests for this project up to 10% ($10,790) as a construction contingency, for a grand total of $118,698. Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Contract Purchase Agreement (3005333) with Elite Power, Inc. as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Request for Quotations No. 10-3444 2090 for the Hilltop Backup Generator Replacement and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff also recommends City Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve change orders, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department is proposing the installation of a replacement backup generator system that serves the Roseville Electric Service Center, including the 24-hour Dispatch Center located at 2090 Hilltop Circle. The Dispatch Center performs critical functions such as system monitoring, outage coordination, and real-time operational response, and therefore requires uninterrupted electrical service. Operational standards limit the allowable loss of utility power to no more than two hours within any 24-hour period, making reliable emergency power essential to maintaining safe and continuous electric system operations.

Replacement of the existing generator system is necessary to ensure continued compliance with safety and permitting standards and to support the City’s ability to maintain uninterrupted essential services during utility outages.

A formal bid was issued with the following vendor response:

Bidder Total Price
Elite Power, Inc. $107,908
Sacramento, CA

FISCAL IMPACT

The cost of the Agreement is $107,908. Authorized change orders on an as-needed basis up to 10% ($10,790) as a construction contingency, would bring the total contract amount to $118,698. Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the minor alteration of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Tiffany Valdez, Buyer

Scott Pettingell, Finance Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-174

2. Contract Purchase Agreement 3005333_Elite Power Inc

3. CEQA Notice of Exemption

REVIEWERS:

Tiffany Valdez, Finance Department - Purchasing Created/Initiated - 5/11/2026 Shannon Wiest, Finance Department - Purchasing Approved - 5/14/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/22/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-174

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ELITE POWER, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Contract Purchase Agreement (3005333) for the 2090 Hilltop Backup Generator Replacement, by and between the City of Roseville and Elite Power, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: 2090 Hilltop Backup Generator Replacement

Project Location(s): 2090 Hilltop Circle, Roseville, California 95678 (APN 473-110-021).

Project Description: The Public Works Department is proposing the installation of a replacement backup generator system that serves the Roseville Electric Service Center, including the 24-hour Dispatch Center located at 2090 Hilltop Circle. Replacement of the existing generator system is necessary to ensure continued compliance with safety and permitting standards and to support the City’s ability to maintain uninterrupted essential services during utility outages. There would be no expansion capacity or use.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Finance Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 1 E xemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 1 consists of the …minor alteration of existing public…facilities…involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use…

The project is located entirely within the Corporation Yard and replaces an existing backup generator to ensure uninterrupted essential services in the event of a utility outage. The project would not result in expansion of use, and no environmentally sensitive resources are loc ated within or near the propert y; therefore the Class 1 exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Tiffany Valdez, Finance Department - Purchasing, (916) 746-1109.

Signature: Date: 5/6/2026
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator,
City of Roseville

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.8
File #: 0709
Item ID: 2026-414

Title: Reservation of Affordable Housing Funds for Development of the Westpark Affordable Apartments
Contact: Trisha Isom 916-746-1239 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval to reserve affordable housing funds for a proposed affordable housing project in Roseville. The request is to reserve $1,775,000 from the City's Low and Moderate Income Asset Fund (Low/Mod) for construction of St. Anton's affordable housing project, Westpark Affordable Apartments. The Low/Mod funds being considered for this loan originated from the repayment of a prior affordable housing loan and are being proposed to support a new affordable housing activity. No General Fund resources will be used.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to reserve $1,775,000 from the City of Roseville Low and Moderate Income Asset Fund toward the construction of St. Anton’s affordable housing project, Westpark Affordable Apartments.

BACKGROUND
The City’s Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (Low/Mod) consists of program income generated from former redevelopment agency affordable housing activities. The Housing Division recently received a payoff of a former redevelopment agency loan (including principal and interest), resulting in the return of $2,688,988 in program income to the Low/Mod fund. On April 20, 2026, the Housing Division released a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the amount of the original loan, $1,775,000. The remaining $913,988 in earned interest will be retained within the Low/Mod fund to ensure limited resources are strategically reinvested to maximize long-term affordable housing outcomes and sustain programs and services that may otherwise be reduced or eliminated due to the lack of stable, ongoing funding.

The Housing Division received one response to the NOFA. St. Anton Communities requested a loan to develop 200 affordable units, including one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments. The project is facing a financing gap due to a federal change that reduced available Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) equity. Staff recommends reserving $1,775,000 in Low/Mod funds toward the construction of St. Anton’s Westpark Affordable Apartments project, consistent with the permitted use of Housing Asset Fund monies under California redevelopment dissolution law.

Subject to completion of full project underwriting and City Council approval, Housing Division staff will return to Council with the required loan documents, regulatory agreement, and related development documents for review and consideration at a future meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT

The City’s Low and Moderate Income Asset Fund consists of program income generated from former redevelopment agency affordable housing activities. The Housing Division received a payoff of a former redevelopment agency loan, resulting in the return of approximately $2,688,988 in program income to the fund. No General Fund resources will be used.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The request for reservation of funds to develop affordable housing meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

3. Enhance economic vitality

Respectfully Submitted,
Trisha Isom, Housing Manager

Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-176

REVIEWERS:

Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 5/8/2026 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 5/8/2026 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 5/8/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/20/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/22/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-176

RESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUNDS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE

WESTPARK AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City’s Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (Low/Mod) consists of program income generated from former redevelopment agency affordable housing activities; and

WHEREAS, the Housing Division received a payoff of a former redevelopment agency loan (including principal and interest), resulting in the return of $2,688,988 million in program income to the Low/Mod fund; and

WHEREAS, on April 20, 2026, the Housing Division released a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the amount of the original loan, $1,775,000; and

WHEREAS, the remaining $913,988 in earned interest will be retained within the Low/Mod fund to ensure limited resources are strategically reinvested to maximize long-term affordable housing outcomes and sustain programs and services that may otherwise be reduced or eliminated due to the lack of stable, ongoing funding; and

WHEREAS, the Housing Division received one response to the NOFA from St. Anton Communities requesting a loan to develop 200 affordable units, including one-, two- and three- bedroom apartments; and

WHEREAS, staff recommends reserving $1,775,000 in Low/Mod funds toward the construction of St. Anton’s Westpark Affordable Apartments project, consistent with the permitted use of Housing Asset Fund monies under California redevelopment dissolution law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, approval of the reservation of $1,775,000 in Low/Mod funds toward the development of St.

Anton’s Westpark Affordable Apartments project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.9
File #: 0709-01
Item ID: 2026-431

Title: HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD/CITY COUNCIL - Quarterly Update 1st Quarter 2026 Contact: Suzi Cook-Turner, Trisha Isom 916-774-5414, 916-746-1239 smcook- [email protected], [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, receive a quarterly report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program. This report is for informational purposes only and has no impact on the City's General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
The City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, is not required to take any action on this item. This quarterly report is for informational purposes only.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the bylaws of the Roseville Housing Authority (RHA), the City Council, acting as the governing board for the Housing Authority, holds its quarterly meeting the first Wednesday of March, June, September, and December, or as soon as possible thereafter. Staff has prepared the following status report regarding lease-up activity for the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program.

The HCV Program provides income-qualified households in Roseville and Rocklin with rental assistance using funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This assistance is utilized at rental units that meet program specific housing standards, are owned by a willing property owner, and are within Roseville or Rocklin city limits. This rental assistance ensures that the household can afford to live in safe and decent housing. During the first quarter of 2026, RHA provided rental assistance to a total of 801 households. This included 641 vouchers in Roseville, 152 in Rocklin, and 8 in other jurisdictions.

RHA remains committed to increasing affordable housing opportunities in the Roseville/Rocklin area.

Highlights for the first quarter of 2026 include:
• Project-Based Vouchers (PBVs): RHA is actively working with property management teams to fill PBV units as they become available. The agency’s commitment for 2026 is to lease a total of 11 PBV units at newly constructed affordable housing properties, expanding housing opportunities for eligible families. During the first quarter staff leased 3 PBV units. The remaining units will be leased as the properties complete construction.
• Community Engagement:
o In January, RHA staff volunteered with Feeding the Foothills, helping package fresh produce for local families. These service activities allow staff to give back to the community while also strengthening team connection.

o In February, senior staff attended the California Association of Housing Authorities (CAHA) conference and met with representatives for Assembly member Joe Patterson and Senator Roger Niello to advocate for statewide housing priorities. Discussions focused on expanding funding for affordable housing preservation and supporting the Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2026 (AB 736 / SB 417).
o RHA was contacted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to discuss the agency’s successful strategies for recruiting landlords and increasing housing stability for voucher participants. During this discussion, staff highlighted RHA’s strong customer service, directed toward both participants and property owners, which plays a key role in maintaining high lease-up rates and long-term tenancy success. RHA also emphasized the partnerships with local non-profits which directly support the effectiveness of the Housing Choice Voucher Program.

Roseville Housing Authority is authorized to provide rental assistance to 845 households through the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program. This allocation includes several specialized voucher types designed to meet the needs of vulnerable populations:
• 34 Emergency Housing Vouchers (EHV): For individuals and families experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness.
• 75 Non-Elderly Disabled (NED) Vouchers: For households with a head of household or partner who is non-elderly and disabled.
• 43 Mainstream Vouchers: For non-elderly households with a disabled head of household or partner who are transitioning out of institutional or segregated settings, currently homeless, or at risk of homelessness.
• 100 HUD-VASH Vouchers: For veteran households referred by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), aiding with housing search, paperwork, and long-term housing stability. • 20 Foster Youth to Independence (FYI) Vouchers: For former foster youth ages 18–24 who are homeless or at risk of homelessness as they transition out of foster care. • 70 Project-Based Vouchers: Unlike tenant-based vouchers, which move with the family, PBV assistance is tied to the specific unit. Families who lease these units pay a portion of rent based on income, and RHA pays the remainder directly to the property owner in the form of a Housing Assistance Payment (HAP).

HUD requires housing authorities to maintain at least a 95% lease-up rate or utilize 95% of annual budget authority to remain in compliance. Agencies achieving 98% or higher in either category may be designated as high performing. RHA continues to meet HUD’s high-performance standards, with 100% expenditure of its annual budget allocation in 2025. The attached table provides a monthly summary of RHA’s voucher programs for the first quarter of 2026. This snapshot highlights strong leasing in EHV/NED, near-full performance in HUD-VASH, and targeted work underway to improve FYI utilization. Due to the current budget shortfall in regular HCV and Mainstream vouchers, we are unable to lease these to full capacity at this time.

Through effective management of specialized voucher programs, strong partnerships with developers, and

expanded landlord participation, RHA continues to deliver high-quality housing assistance and remains a high-performing housing authority. These efforts directly support the City of Roseville and the Roseville Housing Authority’s goals of expanding affordable housing and addressing homelessness in the Roseville/Rocklin region.

FISCAL IMPACT
This Housing Authority Quarterly Status Report is informational only and does not create any additional cost to the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Roseville Housing Authority Quarterly Report meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

3. Enhance economic vitality

Respectfully Submitted,
Suzi Cook-Turner, Housing Supervisor
Trisha Isom, Housing Manager

Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 1 Qtr Lease Up

REVIEWERS:

Suzi Cook-Turner, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 5/12/2026 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 5/14/2026 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 5/15/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

Roseville Housing Authority Voucher Lease-up CY 2026
Actual Lease-
up of FYI 22-HUD FYI (20)
Actual Lease-
up of
Mainstream
12-HUD
Mainstream
(43)
Jan-26 536 570 75 75 97 100 13 20 37 43 39 39
Feb-26 535 570 75 75 99 100 12 20 38 43 34 34
Mar-26 531 570 75 75 96 100 12 20 37 43 32 32
YTD Total 1602 1710 225 225 292 300 37 60 112 129 105 105 YED % Leased 100.0%
2026
Actual
Lease-up
of Regular
10-HUD
Regular
(570)
Actual
Lease-up
of Non-
Elderly
Disabled
5-HUD Non-
Elderly
Disabled
(75)

93.7% 100.0% 97.3% 61.7% 86.8%
Actual
Lease-up
of VASH
11-HUD
VASH (100)
Actual
Lease-up
of EHV
21-HUD
Emergency
Housing
Vouchers
(EHVs) (50)

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.10
File #: 0800-01
Item ID: 2026-419

Title: State Legislative and Regulatory Representation Consulting - Professional Services Agreement
Contact: Rob Baquera 916-746-1170 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff requests approval of a professional services agreement with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son for State Legislative and Regulatory Representation Consulting Services to provide state legislative and regulatory representation consulting services related to legislative advocacy, regulatory monitoring, policy analysis, and strategic government relations support. Following the completion of the competitive procurement process, staff recommends awarding a professional services agreement to Joe A. Gonsalves & Son to continue providing these services to the City of Roseville. The initial one-year agreement includes a monthly retainer of $9,000, for a total annual not-to-exceed amount of $108,000. While the agreement includes the option for up to four additional one-year renewals, each renewal would be subject to annual budget approval and a determination that continuation of the services remains in the best interest of the City. Based on the proposed rate structure for the initial agreement term and all potential renewal terms, the cumulative not-to-exceed amount over the possible five-year period is $600,000. Funding for the proposed agreement is included in the Public Affairs and Communications Department General Fund budget and is incorporated into the proposed FY 2026-27 budget.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement for State Legislative and Regulatory Representation Consulting Services with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son.

Additionally, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute up to four (4) additional one (1) year optional renewals without further City Council approval, contingent upon annual budget approval by the City Council and provided that City staff determines continuation of the agreement remains in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville has a long-standing relationship with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son to provide professional services associated with state legislative and regulatory issues. The relationship spans more than 23 years during which time they have provided exceptional representation and guidance.

The City maintains an active government relations program to monitor, analyze, and advocate on state legislative and regulatory matters that may affect municipal operations, local control, funding opportunities, and City priorities.

State legislation and regulatory actions can significantly impact the City’s ability to deliver services across a broad range of operational areas, including public safety, housing, transportation, public works, economic development, environmental compliance, utilities, and municipal finance. To support these efforts, the City utilizes professional state legislative advocacy and consulting services to assist in navigating the legislative and regulatory process and representing the City’s interests before state policymakers and agencies.

Consistent with City procurement requirements, staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for State Legislative and Regulatory Representation Consulting Services. The RFP solicited proposals from qualified firms with demonstrated experience representing municipal and public agency clients before the California State Legislature and state regulatory agencies.

The City received one proposal which was evaluated based on criteria including firm qualifications, relevant experience, project understanding, staffing and team qualifications, proposed approach, and cost.

Following the evaluation of the proposal, staff determined that Joe A. Gonsalves & Sons was qualified to provide the requested services based on the firm’s extensive experience in municipal advocacy, knowledge of issues affecting local governments, established relationships within the legislative and regulatory environment, and demonstrated ability to support the City’s legislative priorities and advocacy efforts.

The agreement will provide for ongoing legislative advocacy, monitoring of legislative and regulatory activity, strategic policy analysis, coordination with City staff, and representation of the City before state governmental entities.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the proposed agreement is included in the Public Affairs and Communications Department General Fund budget and is incorporated into the proposed FY 2026-27 budget.

The initial one-year agreement includes a monthly retainer of $9,000, for a total annual not-to-exceed amount of $108,000. While the agreement includes the option for up to four additional one-year renewals, each renewal would be subject to annual budget approval and a determination that continuation of the services remains in the best interest of the City.

Based on the proposed rate structure for the initial agreement term and all potential renewal terms, the cumulative not-to-exceed amount over the possible five-year period is $600,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)). This Professional Services Agreement meets the

above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Rob Baquera, Government Relations Administrator

Dennis Kauffman, Chief Financial Officer/Assistant City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-177

2. Agreement

REVIEWERS:

Rob Baquera, Public Affairs and Communications Department Created/Initiated - 5/13/2026 Megan Scheid, City Manager Department - Deputy City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/19/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/20/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/21/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/22/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-177

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOE A. GONSALVES & SON, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Professional Services Agreement for State Legislative and Regulatory Representation Consulting, by and between the City of Roseville and Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VI.11
File #: 0102-12
Item ID: 2026-418

Title: Appointments - City Council Auxiliary Positions
Contact: Helen Dreyer [email protected]

SUMMARY
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appointment of Vice Mayor Alvord as an alternate to the Sites Reservoir Project Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appointment of Vice Mayor Alvord as an alternate to the Sites Reservoir Project Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors.

BACKGROUND
The Sites Reservoir Joint Powers Authority (JPA) Board of Directors was established to oversee the development and construction of the Sites Reservoir Project. One board seat is shared between the City of Roseville, represented by Councilmember Pauline Roccucci, and the Placer County Water Agency, represented by Board Member Gray Allen.

Director Gray Allen recently announced his retirement and Councilmember Pauline Roccucci is now serving as the active representative on the Sites Reservoir JPA Board. It is recommended that Roseville Vice Mayor Karen Alvord be appointed as Councilmember Roccucci's alternate to attend JPA Board meetings in the event of her absence.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The appointment of a councilmember to an auxiliary board meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Helen Dreyer, Assistant City Clerk

Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

ATTACHMENTS:

REVIEWERS:

Helen Dreyer, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 5/14/2026 Helen Dreyer, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/14/2026 Carmen Avalos, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/14/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/3/2026
Item #: VII.12
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2026-408

Title: Park Naming Recommendations
Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution to approve park name recommendations for four new parks. Funding for the new park identification signs is included as a part of each capital project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve park name recommendations for four new parks and to rename the Children's Art Center. These include:
• FD-50: Michael or Mike Zeigler Park
• JM-51: Bernie Milmoe Park
• JM-52: Hawks Landing
• CO-61: Ashbrook Park
• Children's Art Center: The Art Center @Royer Park

BACKGROUND
On an annual basis, each July, park naming suggestions are solicited for new parks that will enter into the construction phase of development within the current fiscal year. The name suggestion period remains open for one month. The Park Naming Subcommittee is made up of three Park & Recreation Commissioners.

The criteria, based on the recently updated Park Naming Policy for name recommendations, is as follows:
• Significant service through volunteerism, philanthropy or community service (of ten years or more) towards the betterment or quality of life for the Roseville community • Significant financial contribution towards a park or improvement • Died in the line of duty
• Geographical significance
• Historical or cultural significance

2025 Naming
In July 2025, the park naming period for four new parks was opened for suggestions from the public. The name suggestion period closed on July 31. The parks subject to be named include:
• FD-50, a 1.7-acre neighborhood park within the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area • JM-51, a 2.6-acre neighborhood park within the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area • JM-52, a 1.5-acre neighborhood park within the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area

• CO-61, a 6-acre neighborhood park within the Campus Oaks area

These parks have either broken ground or are about to be underway.

27 suggestions were suggested in July 2025 and 20 additional names were carried forward from 2024 for this year's consideration.

Recommended Names
The Park Naming Subcommittee met on April 21, 2026, to review the names. At the May 4, 2026, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, the Subcommittee presented name recommendations. The Commission approved these recommendations to be forwarded to the City Council for formal approval. These include:
• FD-50: Michael or Mike Zeigler Park
• JM-51: Bernie Milmoe Park
• JM-52: Hawks Landing
• CO-61: Ashbrook Park

Lastly, staff is recommending that the newly renovated Children's Art Center, located in Royer Park, be renamed The Art Center @ Royer Park. The vision of this space is to utilize the building as a makerspace, which is a collaborative, hands-on workspace where people of all ages can create, learn, and innovate using a variety of tools and materials related to art. Renaming this building would reflect a stronger commitment to inclusivity for the broader community.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the new park identification signs is included as a part of each capital project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services

Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning and Development Manager

Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-169

2. SV Park Locations

3. Campus Oaks Park Location

4. 2025 Park Naming Summary w active names from 2024

5. 2025 Name Submissions

6. 2024 Name Submissions

7. Mark Doane - add'l 2024 submission

REVIEWERS:

Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Created/Initiated - 5/6/2026 Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 5/6/2026 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 5/14/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 5/18/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 5/26/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-169

APPROVING PARK NAME RECOMMENDATIONS

WHEREAS, during July 2025, the City solicited from the public park names for four new parks; and

WHEREAS, the Parks Naming Subcommittee met in April 2026 to review the name submissions along with names on the “active” list carried forward from 2024; and

WHEREAS, the Parks Naming Subcommittee and the Parks & Recreation Commission recommend four name recommendations, as follows:

1) FD-50 Neighborhood Park – Michael or Mike Zeigler Park, located in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area;
2) JM-51 Neighborhood Park – Bernie Milmoe Park, located in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area;
3) JM-52 Neighborhood Park – Hawks Landing, located in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan area; and
4) CO-61 Neighborhood Park – Ashbrook Park

WHEREAS, additionally, it is recommended that the newly renovated Children's Art Center located in Royer Park be renamed to The Art Center @ Royer Park.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the names recommended by the Parks Naming Subcommittee are hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

2025 Park Naming Submissions - Summary
Active from 2024 2025 Submissions
Creekview Park All-American Park
Cricket Park Bernie Milmoe Park
Dainty Pastry Park Detective Michael Davis Jr. Memorial Park DeVries Park Frederick L. Barnett Park
F. Earl Corin Park Harold T. "Bizz' Johnson Park
Frank Luna Jr. Park Interstellar Park
Jim/James MacEgan Park John B. Allard II Park
Kiwani Park John Clinton Park
Langley Green Playing Field (Josiah G.) Gould Park
Martin A Schellhous Park Lauren A. Roberts Park
Micheal Penka Park Mattie Kay (Bell) Park
Molie Galyen Gelder Park Michael Ziegler Park
Roberta Dell-Orto Park /
The Dell-Orto Family Park /
Roberta " Bobbi" Dell-Orto Park
Micheal Strech Park/ Micheal Strech Community Park
Misty Ridge Park
Monument Park/ Monument Village Park/ Monument Cove Park Sandra Sterns Park Nova Star Park
Super Happy Funtime Park Rosie Park
Thomas Dudley Park Ruth Burgess Park
Tudor Rose Park (Robert "Bob") Seawell Park
Whimsical Park Sgt. Nicole Gee Memorial Park
William "Bill" Frkovich Park Sheriff William Elam Memorial Park Zacariah Astill Park Starfield Park
The Park at West Roseville
Tiny Hernandez Park
(Wendy) Gerig Park
Ashbrook Park
Hawks Landing