7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by one-time publication in a newspaper of general circulation circulated within the CFD and the Future Annexation Area. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least 7 days before the date herein set for said public hearing. Such notice shall be substantially in the form specified in Section 53346 of the Act, with the form summarizing the provisions hereof hereby specifically approved.
8. Resolution No. 26-287 is hereby rescinded and superseded in its entirety by this Resolution.
9. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. * * * * * *
I
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, at a regularly scheduled meeting thereof, held on the ______ day of ____________, 2026 by the following vote of the City Council:
A
YES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
_______________________________________
Mayor
A
TTEST:
C ity Clerk of the City of Roseville
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/19/2026
Item #: VI.11
File #: 0800-02
Item ID: 2026-632
Title: Second Reading - Roseville Municipal Code Addition - Administrative Remedies Procedure for Challenges to Fees, Charges, and Assessments Contact: Archana Wagley, My Tien Doan 916-746-1704, 916-774-5472 [email protected], [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council approve an ordinance for second reading adding Chapter 14.05 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding administrative remedies procedures for challenges to property-related fees, charges, and assessments.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce for second reading an ordinance adding Chapter 14.05 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding administrative remedies procedures for challenges to property-related fees, charges, and assessments.
BACKGROUND
Article XIII D, Section 6 of the California Constitution, more commonly known as Proposition 218, created procedural and substantive limitations on the ability of a local agency to levy assessments and property- related fees and charges. For example, property-related fees cannot exceed the proportional cost of providing the service, and the revenues generated from such fees cannot exceed the total cost of service or be used for an unrelated purpose. When a local agency is considering setting new rates, Prop 218 requires, among other things, notice, hearing, and protest procedures, depending on the character of the assessment, fee, or charge.
AB 2257, enacted in 2024, allows local agencies to adopt an optional ‘exhaustion of administrative remedies’ process for challenges to certain local agency fees, specifically property-related water and sewer fees and assessments governed by Prop 218. The process is summarized as follows:
• The local agency must make the proposed rates available at least 45 days prior to the deadline for a property owner to submit objections, and provide notice of the administrative remedy procedure in a public hearing notice.
• The local agency must post evidence supporting the rates on the agency’s website, and mail it to a property owner upon request.
• The local agency must provide property owners with a minimum of 45 days in which to submit a written objection alleging noncompliance with Proposition 218.
• The local agency must respond in writing to each written objection prior to the close of the public hearing during which the agency considers adopting the fee or assessment in question.
If a local agency complies with the above requirements, a person or entity may only bring a judicial action or proceeding alleging noncompliance with Prop 218 after that person or entity has timely submitted to the local agency a written objection to that fee or assessment. AB 2257 also limits any litigation to the
administrative record of the public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed Ordinance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Archana Wagley, EU Business Services Manager
My Tien Doan, Deputy City Attorney
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 7096
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 8/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/6/2026
1 ORDINANCE NO. 7096
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ADDING CHAPTER
14.05 OF TITLE 14 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES PROCEDURE FOR CHALLENGES TO FEES,
CHARGES, AND ASSESSMENTS
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 14.05 is hereby added to Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code to read as follows:
Chapter 14.05
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES PROCEDURE FOR CHALLENGES TO FEES,
CHARGES, AND ASSESSMENTS
Sections:
14.05.010 Scope.
14.05.020 Duty to exhaust issues.
14.05.030 Procedures.
14.05.040 City responses; Council consideration.
14.05.050 City council determinations.
14.05.060 Severability.
Section 14.05.010 Scope.
The duty to exhaust administrative remedies imposed by this chapter extends to:
A. Any fee or charge subject to Article XIII D of the California Constitution; B. Any assessment on real property levied by the city; and C. The methodology used to develop and levy such a fee, charge, or assessment.
Section 14.05.020 Duty to exhaust issues.
No person may bring a judicial action or proceeding alleging noncompliance with the California Constitution or other applicable law for any new, increased, or extended fee, charge, or assessment levied by the city, unless that person submitted to the city clerk a
2 timely, written objection to that fee, charge, or assessment specifying the grounds for alleging noncompliance. The issues raised in any such action or proceeding shall be limited to those raised in such an objection unless a court finds the issue could not have been raised in such an objection by those exercising reasonable diligence.
Section 14.05.030 Procedures.
The city shall:
A. Make available to the public any proposed fee, charge, or assessment to which this chapter applies no less than forty-five (45) calendar days before the deadline for a ratepayer or assessed property owner to submit an objection pursuant to Section
14.05.030(D).
B. Post on its internet website a written basis for the proposed fee, charge, or assessment, such as a cost-of-service analysis or an engineer’s report.
C. Mail the written basis described in Section 14.05.030(B) to a ratepayer or property owner upon request.
D. Provide at least forty-five (45) calendar days for a ratepayer or assessed property owner to review the proposed fee, charge, or assessment and to timely submit to the city clerk a written objection to that fee, charge, or assessment that specifies the grounds for alleging noncompliance. Any objection shall be submitted before the end of the public comment portion of a hearing on the fee, charge, or assessment.
E. Include in a written notice of the hearing the following, including, but not limited to, a notice pursuant to California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4(c) or Section 6(a)(1):
1. A link to the written basis posted on the city’s internet website described in Section 14.05.030(B).
2. All substantive and procedural requirements for submitting an objection to the proposed fee, charge, or assessment such as those specified for a property-related fee under California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 6(a) or for an assessment on real property under California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4(e).
3. A prominently displayed statement that:
a. All written objections must be submitted to the city clerk by the end of the public comment period at the hearing; and
b. A failure to timely object in writing bars any right to challenge that fee, charge, or assessment in court and that any such action or proceeding will be limited to issues identified in such objections.
Section 14.05.040 City responses; Council consideration.
Before or during the hearing, the city shall respond in writing to any timely written objections and the city council shall consider such objections and responses before the end of the hearing. The city council may adjourn the hearing to another date if necessary
3 to respond to comments received after the agenda is posted for the meeting at which the hearing occurs. The city’s responses shall explain the substantive basis for retaining or altering the proposed fee, charge, or assessment in response to written objections, including any reasons to reject requested amendments.
Section 14.05.050 City council determinations.
The city council, in exercising its legislative discretion, shall determine any of the following:
A. Whether the written objections and the city’s response warrant clarifications to the proposed fee, charge, or assessment.
B. Whether to reduce the proposed fee, charge or assessment.
C. Whether to further review the proposed fee, charge, or assessment before making a determination on whether a clarification or reduction to the proposed fee, charge, or assessment is needed.
D. Whether to proceed with the hearing, to continue it, or to abandon the proposal.
Section 14.05.060 Severability.
The provisions of this chapter are hereby declared to be severable. If any provisions, sentence, clause, word, or paragraph of this chapter or the application thereof to any person, establishment, or circumstance shall be held unconstitutional, unlawful, or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction or preempted by state legislation, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity or application of the remaining portion of this chapter.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
4 ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/19/2026
Item #: VI.12
File #: 0800-02
Item ID: 2026-651
Title: Second Reading - Water and Local Wastewater Connection Fees, Solid Waste Impact Fee, and Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fee Adjustments - Roseville Municipal Code Update
Contact: Archana Wagley 916-746-1704 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends adopting an ordinance for second reading amending Section 9.12.100 of Chapter 9.12 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Health and Safety – Solid waste impact fee, Section
9.17.040 of Chapter 9.17 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Franchise term and franchise fee, Sections 14.08.025 and 14.08.026 of Chapter 14.08 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Water connection and Standard connection fees, and Section 14.16.060 of Chapter 14.16 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Local sewer connection fee.
RECOMMENDATION
Introduce for second reading an ordinance amending Section 9.12.100 of Chapter 9.12 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Health and Safety – Solid waste impact fee, Section 9.17.040 of Chapter 9.17 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Franchise term and franchise fee, Sections 14.08.025 and 14.08.026 of Chapter 14.08 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Water connection and Standard connection fees, and Section 14.16.060 of Chapter 14.16 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Local sewer connection fee.
BACKGROUND
Environmental Utilities periodically reviews and updates connection and capacity fees to support a thriving economy and ensure new development contributes its fair share. These fees, paid by developers (not by utility customers), provide the funding to support essential infrastructure expansions necessary to accommodate ongoing growth. Regular fee updates help to maintain system reliability, reflect the true cost of service expansion, and support a well-planned, resilient community.
Water and Local Wastewater Connection Fees
In February 2024, Environmental Utilities issued a request for proposal #08-129 — Water and Wastewater Capacity/Connection Fee Update and Nexus Study designed to provide a comprehensive analysis of its Water and Local Wastewater Capacity/Connection Fees, including current and future impacts to ongoing and one-time costs and revenues. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. was awarded the professional services agreement.
As outlined in Roseville Municipal Code Section 14.08.025, water connection fees shall be collected for the cost of expansion of the raw water supply, water treatment, storage, and distribution facilities from those who receive the benefit thereof. These fees are assessed on all new development to obtain the necessary revenue to construct the capital facilities necessary to support and serve the
increased water system demands imposed by new growth.
The study found that the proportion of water used by medium density residential (MDR) and high density residential (HDR) changed, which has implications for the administration of these fees. The equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) shall be one EDU if zoned low density residential; 56.3 percent (down from 60 percent) of the cost of one EDU for each dwelling unit if zoned medium density residential; and 55 percent (up from 40 percent) of the cost of one EDU for each dwelling unit if zoned high density residential.
While the Raftelis Water and Wastewater Capacity/Connection Fee report refers to the ‘Local Wastewater Capacity Fee’, this term has the same meaning as the ‘Local Sewer Connection Fee’ as defined in the Roseville Municipal Code. Local wastewater connection fees are for necessary capital expenditures associated with the City’s local collection and conveyance system that transport sanitary sewage flows to the City’s two wastewater treatment plants.
The recommended water connection fees, effective October 19, 2026 (with an additional increase of $791 for High Density Residential effective July 1, 2027), include the following revisions:
• Low Density Residential: adjustment from the current adopted fee of $9,363 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) (currently $13,069 after annual 3 percent inflationary adjustments) to $12,388 per EDU.
• Medium Density Residential: adjustment from the current adopted fee of $5,618 per EDU (currently $7,842 after annual 3 percent inflationary adjustments) to $6,970 per EDU. • High Density Residential: adjustment from the current adopted fee of $3,636 per EDU (currently $5,226 after annual 3 percent inflationary adjustments) to $6,808 per EDU, however after input at first reading City Council meeting on August 5, 2026, this amount will be phased in 50% ($791.00) on October 19, 2026 and the remaining 50% ($791.00) on July 1, 2027.
• Nonresidential: adjustment from the current adopted fee of $9,363 per EDU (currently $13,069 after annual 3 percent inflationary adjustments) to $12,388 per EDU.
The recommended local wastewater connection fee for new wastewater system connections will be adjusted effective October 19, 2026, from the current adopted fee of $363 per sewer unit (currently $466 after annual Construction Cost Index inflationary adjustments) to $817 per sewer unit.
The recommended water and local wastewater connection fee charges are summarized below.
Category Current
Per
Equivalent
Dwelling
Unit (EDU)
Proportion
Current
FY2026
-27
Proposed
Per
Equivalent
Dwelling
Unit (EDU)
Proportion
Proposed
FY2026-
27 (10/19/26)
Proposed
FY2027-
28 (7/1/27)
Water Connection
Fee
(Low Density
Residential)
100% $13,069 100% $12,388
Water Connection Fee
(Medium Density
Residential)
60% $7,842 56.3% $6,970
Water Connection Fee
(High Density
Residential)
40% $5,226 55.0% $6,017 +$791
Water Connection Fee
(Commercial and
Irrigation ¾”)
100% $13,069 100% $12,388
Local Wastewater
Connection Fee 100% $466 100% $817
Solid Waste Impact Fees and Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fees
In February 2024, Environmental Utilities issued a request for proposal #08-130 - Solid Waste Connection Impact Fee Update with Nexus Study and Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Fee Update designed to update fee frameworks in alignment with regulations, considering both current and future influences on costs and revenues through comprehensive fee analysis. R3 Consulting Group, Inc. was awarded the professional services agreement.
Solid Waste Impact Fee
The Solid Waste (Waste Services) Impact Fee is collected for the cost of necessary solid waste collection vehicles and equipment required for servicing new developments, allocating costs proportionately to different development types. The City charges developers residential and commercial solid waste development fees to finance the City’s Solid Waste Capital Purchase Fund.
These fees are intended to pay for the cost of solid waste collection capital expenses associated with each new residential and commercial property (i.e., vehicles, carts, containers, and post- collection capital expense) and are held in the Solid Waste Capital Purchase Fund.
The recommended adjustments, effective October 19, 2026, to the Solid Waste Impact Fee include:
• Single-family residential dwelling unit (less than 10,000 ft2): fee increase from $410 to $417.
• Single-family residential dwelling unit (10,000 ft2 or more): fee increase from $410 to $582.
• Commercial/industrial development: fee increase from $0.34 per square foot to $0.36 per square foot.
Multi-Family Solid Waste Development Fee Change in Methodology
The factors considered in changing these fees were the type of container used to store solid waste at the property, and the type of vehicle used to collect solid waste from the property. Based on these factors, single family units, which use plastic carts for storage and side load vehicles for collection, were segregated into one class, while multi-family and commercial units, which use metal bins for storage and front-end load vehicles for collection, were combined into a second class.
The current multi-family development fee is $139 per multi-family unit. R3 followed the same methodology for commercial accounts using data from sample (representative) multi-family accounts provided by the City. That analysis found that the waste generation rate per square foot of multi-family development is 0.00026 cubic yards, which equates to a multi-family development fee of $0.21 per square foot.
The recommended Waste Services impact fee charges will be adjusted annually based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI), effective July 1, 2027. A summary of the recommended fee updates is provided below.
Category FY2026-27 (Current) FY2026-27 (10/19/26)
Single-family residential unit less than 10,000 ft2 $410 per Unit
$417
per Unit
Single-family residential unit 10,000 ft2 or more $410
per Unit
$582
per Unit
Commercial development $0.34
per Square Foot
$0.36
per Square Foot
Multi-Family development $139
per Unit
$0.21
per Square Foot
Waste Services Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fees
The City allows any private hauling company to perform operations within the City so long as a biennial application/renewal fee and a monthly tonnage fee is paid to the City. These collections are irregular and non-scheduled, based on individual customer demand. Additionally, this is exclusively for construction and demolition waste (municipal garbage, recyclables, and organic waste is not collected by Non-Exclusive Franchise (NEF) Haulers).
Per the NEF Haulers’ permits, the NEF Haulers are to pay franchise fees to the City to cover the costs incurred by the City in managing, administering, enforcing, and supplementing the services provided in the NEF hauling operations, as well as the charge for the use of the public right-of-way for the special and lasting access to use it for set-out and collection of solid waste containers, and pavement impacts.
R3 reviewed and analyzed information provided by the City pertaining to the City’s costs. Using that information, R3 calculated the proportionate amounts necessary to cover the City’s costs, including staffing and other costs of providing sanitation service.
The recommended Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fees include an adjustment from $6.88 to $10.60, from October 19, 2026, to June 30, 2027, for every ton of refuse collected and disposed of within the city. Thereafter, the fee will increase to $12.40 from July 1, 2027. The fees are summarized below and are reasonably related to the City's costs of managing and administering Non-Exclusive Franchise hauling operations.
Two (2) Year Incremental Adjustment of Franchise Fee to Maximum Calculated Category FY2026-27
(Current)
FY2026-27
(10/1/2026) FY2027-28
NEF Hauler Franchise Fee (per ton) $6.88 $10.60 $12.40
Approval of the recommended adjustments fulfills the legal requirement to update the studies at
least every eight years (California Government Code 66016.5). Second, it aligns with the City’s General Plan and the appropriate level of funding necessary to support current and future capacity demands.
STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Staff presented the proposed waste services impact fee and non-exclusive franchise hauler permit fees to the Public Utility Commission in March 2025, followed by the proposed water and local wastewater connection fee adjustments in June 2026. The Commission recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve the proposed adjustments. Staff also conducted stakeholder outreach to the North State Building Industry Association through workshops held in March 2025 and May 2026. A letter from the North State Building Industry Association was received after the agenda was posted for the first reading, requesting a phased in approach to the local water connection fee for High Density Residential. At the August 5, 2026 City Council meeting a discussion was held on this request and ultimately a 50-50 2 year phased in approach for the High Density Residential was approved by City Council with the fee going up $791 effective October 19, 2026, and then another $791 (plus normal inflationary adjustment) on July 1, 2027.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed fee adjustment to the Local Wastewater Connection Fees, and the Solid Waste Impact Fee will align with the projected new residential and nonresidential development in the City. Sufficient funds will be available to support Capital Improvement expenditures needed to serve new development. The proposed fee adjustments will result in estimated $552,000 revenue increase for Wastewater Construction Fund, and $22,000 revenue increase for Waste Services Capital Purchases Fund for FY2026-27. The two- year 50-50 phase-in water connection fee adjustment for HDR and multi-family units will result in the estimated revenue loss of $352,000 in the three-year period for the Water Construction Fund. There is no impact to operations funds (rates) as a result of this action.
The Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fee will increase Waste Services Operations Fund revenue by approximately $47,000 which offsets expenditures related to NEF hauling operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Archana Wagley, EU Business Services Manager
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 7095
REVIEWERS:
Joseph Barrow, Environmental Utilities Department Created/Initiated - 8/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/6/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/10/2026
ORDINANCE NO. 7095
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION
9.12.100 OF CHAPTER 9.12 OF TITLE 9 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING HEALTH AND SAFETY – SOLID WASTE IMPACT FEE, SECTION 9.17.040 OF CHAPTER 9.17 OF TITLE 9 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING FRANCHISE TERM AND FRANCISE FEE, SECTIONS 14.08.025 AND 14.08.026 OF CHAPTER 14.08 OF TITLE 14 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
WATER CONNECTION AND STANDARD CONNECTION FEES, AND SECTION
14.16.060 OF CHAPTER 14.16 OF TITLE 14 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING LOCAL SEWER CONNECTION FEE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 9.12.100 of Chapter 9.12 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “A”.
SECTION 2. Section 9.17.040 of Chapter 9.17 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “B”.
SECTION 3. Section 14.08.025 and Section 14.08.026 of Chapter 14.08 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “C”.
SECTION 4. Section 14.16.060 of Chapter 14.16 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “D”.
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of sixty (60) days from the date of adoption.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT “A”
§ 9.12.100. Solid waste impact fee.
A. Solid Waste Impact Fee Established. Each single-family waste generator and commercial waste generator serviced by city-owned containers collection pursuant to this chapter shall pay a solid waste impact fee upon issuance of a building permit as described below. The fee is based on a “Study” (Development Fee Update), which is attached to the council communication, dated March 13, 2025, entitled “Development Fee Update.” Containers shall be delivered upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the unit/development by the chief building inspector.
1. Noncommercial.
a. Single-family residential dwelling unit: $417.00 per unit of less than 10,000 ft2 and $582 per unit of 10,000 ft2 or greater.
b. Multifamily residential dwelling unit: $0.21 per square foot.
2. Commercial/industrial development: $0.36 per square foot.
The above fees will be effective October 19, 2026.
The Construction Cost Index (CCI) inflationary fee adjustment shall become effective July 1, 2027. The fee established by this chapter shall be adjusted annually July 1st beginning on July 1, 2027, by a percentage equal to the adjustment rate for the prior year for construction costs as determined by the director in the preceding June. The director's determination shall be based upon averaging the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for 20 cities and for San Francisco, as published in the Engineering News Record publication for the preceding 12 months ending in May.
B. Ownership. The city shall retain ownership of the containers. Persons owning or renting property served by such containers are responsible for the security of the containers. In the event of fire, theft, or other disappearance of container from the property a replacement container will be obtained from the city upon payment of the fee established in subsection A of this section. Persons owning or renting property served by such containers shall, upon vacating the premises, leave the primary container for the next occupant in a secure location upon the premises.
Persons who have ordered an extra container shall, upon vacating the premises, call the city to have the extra container removed. Persons owning or renting property served by such containers are responsible for the appearance and cleanliness of the container.
C. Replacement Containers. A replacement container may be obtained upon payment of the fee established in subsection A of this section. Replacement of a container no longer usable due to normal wear shall not be subject to a replacement fee.
ATTACHMENT “B”
§ 9.17.040. Franchise term and franchise fee.
A franchise for refuse hauling shall be for a term of two years. In addition to a franchise application fee, each franchise shall be required to pay a franchise fee of $10.60 from October 19, 2026, to June 30, 2027, to the city for every ton of refuse collected and disposed of within the city. Thereafter, the fee will increase to $12.40 from July 1, 2027.
The franchise fee shall be assessed based on the monthly reports required in Section
9.17.080, and shall be paid monthly by the franchisee.
A franchise may be renewed for one or more additional periods aggregating not more than two years, upon the recommendation of the director. Any person holding a franchise for refuse hauling shall obtain, provide and continuously maintain a city business license, and shall obtain, provide and continuously maintain insurance pursuant to city insurance requirements as set forth in Section 9.17.110.
If franchise fees are not paid by the franchisee at the times required by this section, then in addition to the franchise fees, the franchisee shall pay a late payment charge in an amount equal to two percent of the franchise fee that is due, plus interest equal to one and one-half percent per month of the entire balance due until paid in full.
ATTACHMENT “C”
§ 14.08.025. Water connection fees.
A. In order that appropriate provision be made for sharing the costs of the maintenance and expansion of the raw water supply, water treatment, storage, and distribution facilities of the city by those who receive the benefits thereof, there are established connection fees to such facilities, which fees shall be imposed in addition to the service connection costs charged pursuant to Section 14.08.020. Such additional water connection fees include a "standard connection fee" and an "irrigation connection fee." The fees shall be set so that they are equal to, but not greater than, the cost of service.
B. The water connection fees shall be based upon the applicable "dwelling unit equivalent" ("DUE") and density assignment. The fee for one DUE shall be $12,388.00 (per LDR unit), $6,970.00 (per MDR unit), and $12,388.00 (per nonresidential unit) on October 19, 2026. The fee for one DUE shall be $6,017.00 (per HDR unit) on October 19, 2026, and thereafter increase by $791.00 on July 1, 2027 (plus the amount listed in Section C below).
C. The connection fee amount set forth above shall be adjusted annually on July 1st of each year by three percent or by a percentage equal to the inflation rate for the prior year for construction costs as determined by the environmental utilities director in the preceding June, whichever is greater. The director's determination of the percentage equal to the inflation rate for the prior year for construction costs shall be based upon the Engineering News Record, Construction Cost Index for the prior 12 months ending in May. The environmental utilities director shall report the amount of the adjustment in percentage terms and the dollar amount due per DUE to the city council annually at the first regular meeting of the council following the adjustment of the fee.
D. Except as otherwise provided, all water connection fees established by this chapter shall be payable upon issuance of a building permit. Connection fees will be determined using the amount in effect on the date of building permit issuance.
§ 14.08.026. Standard connection fee.
A. The standard connection fee for various types of service and applicable DUEs are based upon water service sizes required by the Uniform Plumbing Code and DUEs as shown in Section 14.08.029 for nonresidential connections and upon large lot use density categories for residential connections as defined herein. The standard connection fee shall be calculated as follows:
For all dwellings, as defined in Roseville Municipal Code Section 19.08.080(F), the connection fee shall be based upon the large lot land use density as defined within the Land Use Element of the city's general plan, the water service size as required by the Uniform Plumbing Code, and the equivalent DUEs as shown in Section 14.08.029. The minimum connection fee shall be based on a three-quarter-inch service size and the equivalent dwelling unit shall be one DUE if zoned low density residential; 56.3 percent
of the cost of one DUE for each dwelling unit if zoned medium density residential; and,
55.0 percent of the costs of one DUE for each dwelling unit if zoned high density residential. Fees shall not be based on the size of the master meter to a multifamily dwelling. Multifamily dwellings shall also pay an irrigation connection fee.
B. For all dwellings, as defined in Roseville Municipal Code Section 19.08.080(F), as may be amended from time to time, that require automatic fire protection systems pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Section 16.16.110, as may be amended from time to time, the increased service size will not be assessed an additional fee associated with the fire protection system requirement. Connection fees shall be based on a three-quarter inch service size and the equivalent dwelling units required by subsection A without consideration for any fire protection system required by Roseville Municipal Code Section
16.16.110, as may be amended from time to time.
C. No additional water connection fee shall be charged for facilities located within a multifamily dwelling complex that are appurtenant to the general function of the multifamily dwelling complex. Such facilities include, but shall not be limited to, community centers, recreational centers, rental offices, maintenance offices and fire systems.
D. Pursuant to the fee policy identified in Roseville Municipal Code Section 19.60.100, as may be amended from time to time, no water connection fee shall be charged for accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures.
ATTACHMENT “D”
§ 14.16.060. Local sewer connection fee.
A. A local sewer connection fee shall be charged in accordance with Section 14.16.010 for each connection to the city-owned public sewer.
B. The local sewer connection fee shall be $817.00 per sewer unit on October 19, 2026.
C. The Construction Cost Index (CCI) inflationary fee adjustment shall become effective July 1, 2027. The fee established by this chapter shall be adjusted annually July 1st beginning on July 1, 2027 by a percentage equal to the adjustment rate for the prior year for construction costs as determined by the director in the preceding June. The director's determination shall be based upon averaging the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for 20 cities and for San Francisco, as published in the Engineering News Record publication for the preceding 12 months ending in May. The resultant fee shall be rounded to the nearest dollar figure.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/19/2026
Item #: VI.13
File #: 0102-16 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-647
Title: Council Discretionary Funds - Budget Adjustment
Contact: Amy Ruiz 916-746-1362 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $2,522 to carry forward unappropriated FY2025-26 Discretionary Funds for use in FY2026-27.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment in the amount of $2,522 to carry forward unappropriated FY2025-26 Discretionary Funds for use in FY2026-27.
BACKGROUND
The Citizens’ Benefit Fund was established in 1993 with the net proceeds from the sale of the Roseville Hospital. The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, annually appropriate up to 90 percent of the annual earnings of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of the City of Roseville. The City Council, without the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, may annually appropriate a minor amount up to $15,000 of the annual earnings for the purpose of improving the quality of life in Roseville.
The City's fiscal year ended on June 30, 2026, at which time the remaining balance was $2,522.
Per section 4.06.040 of the Roseville Municipal Code, the unappropriated amount will be carried forward to subsequent fiscal years. Doing so will allow Council greater flexibility on discretionary requests received in FY2026-27. Carrying forward the unspent $2,522 will increase the Council Discretionary Funds from $15,000 to $17,522. The method to process the carry-over is the standard budget adjustment request form.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Annually, the Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer allocates $15,000 of the annual earnings on the Citizens’ Benefit Fund per section 4.06.040 in the Municipal Code and includes it in the annual budget along with the Citizens’ Benefit Fund resources available for appropriation each year. These earnings are restricted for the purpose of improving the quality of life for Roseville residents and appropriated by the City Council. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $2,522. Carrying forward the unspent $2,522 will increase the Council Discretionary Funds from $15,000 to $17,522.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The
budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Amy Ruiz, Executive Assistant
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 7098
REVIEWERS:
Amy Ruiz, City Manager Department - City Manager Created/Initiated - 7/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/10/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/10/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/10/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/10/2026
ORDINANCE NO. 7098
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2026-27, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment to carry forward unappropriated Council Discretionary Funds.
SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 07/14/2026
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE:
PREPARER NAME & TITLE:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
FISCAL YEAR:
ORDINANCE:
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
3901 5570 54091 2,522 Council Discretionary Funds FY26 to FY27 balance carry forward (Function - 30504)
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 2,522
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 2,522
FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project DESCRIPTION
3901 3601 00000 000000 (2,522) Decrease Citizens Benefit Fund Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (2,522)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:
Per Roseville Municipal Code (Section 4.060.040), City Council has the authority to carry forward any unappropriated Citizens' Benefit Fund Council Discretionary Funds from one fiscal year to the next. This budget adjustment requests to carry forward $2,522 from FY2026 to FY2027, which will increase the Council's Discretionary Funds for FY2027 to $17,522.
2026-27
Amy Ruiz, Sr. Executive Assistant
Amy Ruiz, Sr. Executive Assistant
City Manager
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/19/2026
Item #: VI.14
File #: 0102-03
Item ID: 2026-692
Title: Minutes of Prior Meetings
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the August 5, 2026 City Council Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the August 5, 2026 City Council Meeting.
BACKGROUND
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. August 5, 2026 City Council Meeting_Minutes_Preview
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 8/10/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/10/2026
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting Meeting
August 5, 2026
6:00 PM
City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bernasconi called the meeting to order at 6:01 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Police Lieutenant Nick Graves led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
City Clerk Carmen Avalos announced the procedures for addressing the City Council.
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is an opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
Chris Peterson - spoke on meeting with City to discuss use of Helium to minimize wireless coverage gaps.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to Flock cameras:
Chris Peterson
Kurtis Ostrom
Zoe Haskins
Will Forseth
Armando Bueno
James Turner
Matt Brehmer
Vanessa O'Connor
Joyce Flohr - requested speed sign at 607 Iverson.
Vanessa O'Connor - spoke in opposition and/or limitations to data centers.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to remove item 16 to be discussed separately, and approve the remaining items as presented with Mayor Bernasconi abstaining from Item 19 due to a conflict of interest as she owns property within 500 feet of the project. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
1. Replacement Learning Management System Vendor – Letter Agreement (ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a Letter Agreement with Alliance Cooperative Energy Services Power Marketing LLC (ACES) to maintain Roseville's access to ACES' new Learning Management System (LMS). ACES has transitioned its LMS platform from Geo Learning to Docebo and requires participating entities to execute a Letter Agreement acknowledging their intent to be bound by the existing Master Service Agreement. There is no cost associated with this Letter Agreement, as access to the Docebo LMS platform is included in the existing Master Service Agreement with ACES.
CONTACT: Petra Wallace, Addison Schueller 916-774-5510, 916-774-1135 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-304 approving a letter agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Alliance for Cooperative Energy Services Power Market LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
2. Waste Disposal Services - Contract Purchase Agreement (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE
PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Advanced Chemical Transport LLC, dba ACTenviro for hazardous and non-hazardous waste disposal services. The cost of the five-year agreement is $700,000 per year, for a total not to exceed $3,500,000 over the five-year term. Adequate funding is included in the FY2026-27 Electric Fund budget. Funding for subsequent years will be included in the Electric Department's annual budgets, subject to City Council approval.
CONTACT: Nathan Ribordy 916-746-1673 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-305 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Advanced Chemical Transport LLC dba ACTenviro,and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
3. California Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program – 2027 Allowance Allocation (ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval to allocate 100% of the City’s 2027 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) allowances to the Compliance account for future compliance obligations, with no allowances allocated to the Auction account. The allowances, valued at approximately $7.9 million, will be used to offset future GHG compliance obligations.
CONTACT: Pooja Sharma 916-746-1658 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-306 approving 100% of the allocation of City’s 2027 Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program allowances.
4. Electric Department Physical Security Plan Review (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - DISTRIBUTION &
OPERATIONS)
Summary: California Senate Bill (SB) 699 requires the state’s electric utilities to develop and submit robust physical security plans to safeguard their electrical distribution systems from intentional threats. Roseville Electric has completed its required five-year program review and update of the Roseville Electric Utility Security Plan, pursuant to SB 699 and California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision 19-01-018. This plan outlines how the utility identifies, evaluates, and mitigates potential physical security risks to critical electric distribution facilities.
This regular and periodic review supports statewide efforts to strengthen the security and resilience of utility infrastructure. Staff is recommending City Council acknowledgment that the required five-year program review has been completed in accordance with CPUC Decision 19-01- 018 and authorization for the Electric Director or designee to transmit a Notice of Program Review and Plan Update to the CPUC within thirty (30) days of City Council approval. This action has no fiscal impact.
CONTACT: Tom Pontes 916-774-5550 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-308 acknowledging and approving the five-year program review and update of the Roseville Electronic Physical Security Plan and authorizing the transmittal of a Notice of Program Review and Plan Update to the California Public Utilities Commission.
5. Roseville Municipal Code Addition - Administrative Remedies Procedure for Challenges to Fees, Charges, and Assessments (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance adding Chapter 14.05 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding administrative remedies procedures for challenges to property-related fees, charges, and assessments.
CONTACT: Archana Wagley, My Tien Doan 916-746-1704, 916-774-5472 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an ordinance of the Council of the City of Roseville adding Chapter
14.05 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding administrative remedies procedure for challenges to fees, charges, and assessments.
6. Debt, Lease, and Subscription-Based Information Technology Arrangement Management Solutions - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Fifth Asset Inc. dba DebtBook in the amount of $81,000 covering a three-year term to provide debt, lease, and subscription-based information technology arrangement management software. The recommended agreement is a sole source because the system has been fully implemented and configured to meet the City’s operational and reporting needs, and no other vendor has been identified that provides a comparable, integrated platform designed for the public sector with the functionality required to support the City’s debt, lease, and subscription accounting and reporting needs. Funding is included in the Finance Department's budget in the General Fund.
CONTACT: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-303 approving a sole source contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Fifth Asset Inc. dba Debtbook, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
7. Indirect Cost Study - Professional Services Agreement (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a Professional Services Agreement with MGT Impact Solutions, LLC to develop the City's Cost Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost Rate Proposals. Staff also recommends that City Council authorize up to two (2) optional one-year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that adequate funding is approved through the annual budget process and staff determines that continuing with the same consultant is in the City's best interest. Adequate funds are available in the Finance Department's FY2026-27 operating budget in the General Fund for the first year of this agreement. Funding for any renewal terms will be evaluated as part of the annual budget development process.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-291 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and MGT Impact Solutions, LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
8. Woodcreek Clubhouse Exhaust Hood and Walk-In Cooler Replacement (RFQ 10-3448) – Reject All Bids (FINANCE DEPARTMENT - PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the request to reject all bids received for Request for Quotations (RFQ) 10-3448 for the materials and labor to replace the existing food service exhaust hood, Ansul system, walk-in cooler and freezer, and make exterior ADA upgrades at the Woodcreek Clubhouse located at 5880 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd. During staff review, it was determined that the bid received was in excess of the approved project budget. Staff plans to revise the bid specifications and reissue a new RFQ. There is no fiscal impact at this time since there will be no award.
CONTACT: Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-290 rejecting all bids for RFQ 10-3448 for the Woodcreek Clubhouse exhaust hood and walk-in cooler replacement.
9. Roseville Advantage Financing Program - Banking Services Agreements (FINANCE
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of banking services agreements with the following three local banks to continue the Roseville Advantage Financing Program: First Northern Bank, River City Bank, and River Valley Community Bank. The recommended banking services agreements will result in a one-time investment of up to $15 million of the City’s short-term investment funds being deposited into locally headquartered banks to leverage local lending capacity, with no loss of City investment income. The initial agreements will run through June 30, 2029, and the City has the right to renew the agreements for three (3) additional one-year terms at its sole discretion. Continuation of the Program has no impact on the General Fund.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-292 approving a banking services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and First Northern Bank of Dixon, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-293 approving a banking services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and River City Bank, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
c. Adopt Resolution No. 26-294 approving a banking services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and River Valley Community Bank, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
10. Resolution of Intention to Form Villages West Community Facilities District No. 1 (Public Facilities) (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends Council approve two resolutions, one to form a Community Facilities District, designate an improvement area therein, establish a future annexation area,
provide for additional future improvement areas therein, and authorize the levy of a special tax therein to finance public facilities and public services in and for such Community Facilities District and a resolution of Intention to incur bonded indebtedness to finance the acquisition and construction of certain facilities in and for the City of Roseville Villages West Community Facilities District No. 1 (Public Facilities) and improvement areas therein. Staff also recommends Council set a meeting date of August 19, 2026, at 6 p.m., in the Roseville Civic Center, Council Chambers at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, as the time and place to conduct a public hearing.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-286, a Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Roseville to form a Community Facilities District, designate an improvement area therein, establish a future annexation area, provide for additional future improvement areas therein, and authorize the levy of a special tax therein to finance public facilities and public services in and for such Community Facilities District; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-287, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville of Intention to incur bonded indebtedness to finance the acquisition and construction of certain facilities in and for the City of Roseville Villages West Community Facilities District No. 1 (Public Facilities) and improvement areas therein.
11. Public Safety Software Cloud Solution - Sole Source Agreement (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT - CLIENT SERVICES)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source Software as a Service (SaaS) agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc., transitioning the City’s existing Tyler systems into a secure, cloud-hosted environment and updates the terms related to service delivery, support, and maintenance. Tyler Technologies is the only provider capable of delivering, migrating, and hosting the City’s current suite of Tyler public safety applications; computer-aided dispatch, records management, reporting, mobile systems, and numerous integrated interfaces within a unified, Criminal Justice Information Services compliant environment. The initial term runs from August 1, 2026, through July 31, 2029. The total cost for the three-year initial term, including one-time implementation fees and recurring SaaS subscription charges, is $1,622,794.19.
CONTACT: Melissa Patrick 916-774-5127 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-307 approving the Software as a Service agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Tyler Technologies, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
12. Employee Recognition, Rewards, and Survey Management Software - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - CLIENT SERVICES)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to a contract purchase agreement (CPA) with WorkTango, Inc., providing employee recognition, rewards, and survey management subscription services, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville. This amendment increases the CPA amount from $74,997 to $81,879.30 and is included in the Information Technology Operating Budget.
CONTACT: Melissa Patrick 916-774-5127 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-295 approving a contract purchase agreement amendment, by and between the City of Roseville and WorkTango, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
13. Architectural Services - On-Call Professional Design Services Agreement (PARKS, RECREATION,
AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an on-call professional design services agreement with WMB Architects, Inc. with a not-to-exceed amount of $200,000 per year. Work performed under the agreement will be funded, as applicable, by developer fees, capital rehabilitation funds, and/or capital improvement project funds. Staff additionally requests authority for the City Manager or designee to execute up to two (2) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-296 approving an on-call professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and WMB Architects, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
14. Civil Engineering Services - On-Call Professional Design Services Agreements (PARKS,
RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of on-call professional design services agreements with Sandis Civil Engineers Surveyors Planners and CWE with a not-to-exceed amount of $200,000 per year, per agreement. Work performed under these agreements will be paid using developer fees, capital rehabilitation funds and/or capital improvement project funds. Staff additionally requests authority for the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to execute up to three (3) additional one (1) year renewals per agreement without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with these consultants is not in the best interest of the City.
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-297 approving an on-call professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Sandis Civil Engineers Surveyors Planners, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-298 approving an on-call professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and CWE, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
15. Skylight Replacement - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT - FACILITIES)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement amendment with MCM Roofing Company Inc. to extend the contract end date from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026, to provide skylight replacement services for Corporation Yard Buildings A, B, C, and D, and the Roseville Electric Service Center.
CONTACT: Mathew Hoffer 916-746-1156 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-289 approving a contract purchase agreement amendment, by and between the City of Roseville and MCM Roofing Company Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
16. Staffing and Salary Schedule Updates (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Management A & B salary schedules reflecting the addition of the new Public Affairs and Communications Director classification and the retitle of Department Public Information Officer to Public Information Officer. The City allocation schedule updates reflect the addition of two (2) regular, full-time positions (Public Affairs and Communications Director and Principal Planner), the retitle of six (6) regular, full-time Department Public Information Officer positions to Public Information Officer, and the deletion of one (1) regular, full-time Crime Scene Investigator I/II position. The fiscal impact to the General Fund for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2026-27 (FY2026-27) is $10,544, which can be absorbed within existing appropriations; therefore, no budget adjustment is required. The ongoing annual General Fund impact is $714.
CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7094 amending Ordinance No. 7063, the Salary Ordinance for Management Employees, as amended by Appendix “Q” to be effective August 8, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
b. Motion to approve the attached Citywide allocation schedule effective August 8, 2026.
Item removed by staff for presentation.
Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson made the presentation to City Council.
No public comment received.
Motion by Vice Mayor Alvord, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to adopt Ordinance No. 7094 amending Ordinance No. 7063, the Salary Ordinance for Management employees, as amended by Appendix "Q" to be effective August 8, 2026, as an urgency measure and motion to approve the attached Citywide allocation schedule effective August 8, 2026. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
17. Baseline Marketplace Baseline Road Segment 1, 2, and 3 - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Baseline Marketplace Baseline Road Segments 1, 2, and 3. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CONTACT: Andrew Druck 916-774-5577 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-284 accepting the public work known as Baseline Marketplace Baseline Road Segment 1, 2, and 3 project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting a portion of the dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.
18. Baseline Marketplace Fiddyment Segment 2B - Notice of Completion. (DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Baseline Marketplace Fiddyment Segment 2B. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CONTACT: Andrew Druck 916-774-5577 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-285 accepting the public work known as Baseline Marketplace Fiddyment Road Segment 2B project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting a portion of the dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.
19. 808 Main Street - Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the 808 Main Street parcel map and approval of a Subdivision Agreement with Homeland Enterprises, LLC. The Engineering Division has completed its review of the parcel map and found that it complies with the approved ministerial lot split.
This map will create 3 residential lots. The actions requested have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.
CONTACT: Robert Medina 916-774-5517 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the parcel map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements offered thereon; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-299 approving a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Homeland Enterprises, LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
20. CliftonStrengths and Gallup Global Strengths Coaching Program - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT - CITY MANAGER) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole-source contract purchase agreement with Gallup, Inc. in the amount of $100,000 for a 4.5-day, onsite CliftonStrengths and Gallup Global Strengths Coach training course for thirty employees, to be conducted October 12-16, 2026.
Gallup, Inc. is the sole organization authorized to teach, certify, and license the CliftonStrengths Global Strengths Coach curriculum. Funding for these services is included in the City Manager's Department budget in the General Fund.
CONTACT: Kate Rebello 916-774-5945 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-300 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Gallup, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
21. Independent Audit and Comparative Analysis of Animal Control Services - Professional Services Agreement (POLICE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional service agreement with MGT Impact Solution, LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it. The purpose of this work is to provide the City with objective and defensible data regarding the cost and scope of services currently provided under contract with the Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, including cost per animal and service level comparisons with similar agencies. The total cost to complete the Independent Audit and Comparative Analysis of Animal Control
Services is $108,898. Funding will come from the Police Department's FY2026-27 budget, in the General Fund.
CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-301 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and MGT Impact Solutions, LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
22. 2026 Citywide Records Retention Schedule Update (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the updated 2026 Citywide Records Retention Schedule. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.
CONTACT: Kelly Aye 916-774-5377 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-288 adopting the 2026 Citywide Records Retention Schedule.
23. Legal Services Agreement (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of an agreement with Remy Moose Manley LLP, to provide legal services on an as-needed basis. Expenses will be paid by the City Attorney's operating budget in the General Fund, or by other departments and funds as appropriate.
CONTACT: Kelly Aye 916-774-5377 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-302 approving an agreement for legal services, by and between the City of Roseville and Remy Moose Manley LLP, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
24. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the July 15, 2026 City Council Meeting.
CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve minutes of the July 15, 2026 City Council Meeting.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:
1. Open the Public Hearing
2. Presentation by staff
3. Presentation by applicant or appellant
4. Accept public testimony
5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period
6. Close the Public Hearing
7. City Council comments and questions
8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.
Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.
25. Water and Local Wastewater Connection Fees, Solid Waste Impact Fee, and Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fee Adjustments - Public Hearing and Roseville Municipal Code Update (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a nexus study and introduce for first reading an ordinance amending sections pertaining to the Water Connection Fee (§14.08.025 and §14.08.026), Local Wastewater (Sewer) Connection Fee (§14.16.060), Solid Waste Impact Fee (§9.12.100) and Franchise Hauler Fee (§9.17.040) of the Roseville Municipal Code. The proposed changes are to update the Water Connection Fee, Local Wastewater Connection Fee, Solid Waste Impact Fee and Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fee along with corresponding Roseville municipal code changes.
CONTACT: Archana Wagley 916-746-1704 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Hold the public hearing to receive public comments and respond to questions regarding the proposed adjustments to Water, and Local Wastewater Connection Fees, Solid Waste Impact Fee and Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fee; and
b. Adopt the nexus study; and
c. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Section 9.12.100 of Chapter 9.12 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Health and Safety – Solid waste impact fee, Section
9.17.040 of Chapter 9.17 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Franchise term and franchise fee, Sections 14.08.025 and 14.08.026 of Chapter 14.08 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Water connection and Standard connection fees, and Section
14.16.060 of Chapter 14.16 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Local sewer connection fee.
Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 6:32 P.M.
Environmental Utilities Director Sean Bigley introduced Environmental Utilites Business Services Manager Archana Wagley who made the presentation to City Council.
Environmental Utilites Director Sean Bigley continued the presentation.
No public comment received.
Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 7:30 P.M.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to hold the public hearing to receive public comments and respond to questions regarding the proposed adjustments to Water, and Local Wastewater Connection Fees, Solid Waste Impact Fee and Non-Exclusive Franchise Hauler Permit Fee; and adopt the nexus study; and introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Section 9.12.100 of Chapter 9.12 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Health and Safety - Solid Waste Impact Fee, Section 9.17.040 of Chapter 9.17 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Franchise term and franchise fee, Sections 14.08.025 and 14.08.026 of Chapter 14.08 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Water connection and Standard connection fees, and Section 14.16.060 of Chapter 14.16 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Local sewer connection fee.
The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Mayor Bernasconi.
Noes: Councilmember Roccucci
VIII. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
City Manager Casey announced the City would be addressing the use of Flock cameras on the City's website.
Councilmember Roccucci spoke on various community events.
Northern California Water Association Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported on attendance.
Councilmember Mendonsa spoke on various community events.
Roseville Economic Development Advisory Committee Meeting - Councilmember Mendonsa reported on attendance.
Vice Mayor Alvord spoke on various community events.
Councilmember Houdesheldt spoke on various community events.
Mayor Bernasconi spoke on various community events.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Bernasconi adjourned the meeting at 7:22 P.M.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/19/2026
Item #: VII.15
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2026-548
Title: Fiddyment Homestead Vision Plan
Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Fiddyment Homestead Vision Plan. Funding for phased improvements has yet to be identified. The completion of the Vision Plan allows for the opportunity to seek grants related to projects with historical significance. The completion of the Plan also allows for fundraising efforts with partners such as the Roseville Historical Society and others.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the Fiddyment Homestead Vision Plan.
BACKGROUND
In early 2024, Page & Turnbull, an architectural firm, began work on a Vision Plan for the historic Fiddyment Homestead. This homestead is located within Pistachio Regional Park, and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The goal of the Vision Plan is to establish opportunities to renovate and develop a space for education and public use for a variety of events while maintaining its historical relevance.
Public Outreach
Throughout 2024 and 2025, several outreach efforts occurred. This included an “opportunities and constraints” brainstorming meeting with key stakeholders, virtual and in person public workshops and a final two-week write-in period. Participation included members of the Roseville Historical Society, West Roseville residents and the Roseville High School District.
The Vision Plan
In addition to the feedback received, work included an overall assessment of the homestead including the home, the garage and the immediate surroundings. The final draft of the Vision Plan considers the approved Pistachio Regional Park master plan and outlines a schematic design for the outdoor spaces in the front, side and back of the home. This includes flexible gathering spaces for small classroom settings/tours with interactive interpretation areas, informal use for picnicking or sitting and scheduled use for special events such as art and wine fairs, a farmer’s market, small event private reception rentals, etc.
ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) improvements would also be incorporated with the outdoor space design.
The Vision Plan proposes that in addition to structural renovations of the home, new public uses would include more permanent exhibits along the walls of the home’s first floor and moveable exhibits within the great room. The flexible exhibits could be moved, if needed, to accommodate indoor rentals for small gatherings. The home renovation would include a catering kitchen, a staff office space and accessible
restrooms. The second floor is proposed to include a workroom for staff to assemble and store exhibits as well as a potential art gallery space. The garage would be renovated to become an indoor/outdoor classroom with restrooms and potentially a small gift shop area.
Lastly, the Vision Plan outlines a phasing plan with cost estimates. This provides a road map for development which allows for public use of the completed phases while the home and remainder of the site is developed. The estimates provide valuable information in the pursuit of grants and/or donations.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for phased improvements has yet to be identified. The completion of the Vision Plan allows for the opportunity to seek grants related to projects with historical significance. The completion of the Plan also allows for fundraising efforts with partners such as the Roseville Historical Society and others.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
CEQA compliance for the Fiddyment Homestead Visioning Project and its implementation was achieved in the 2004 adoption of the West Roseville Specific Plan (WRSP) EIR (certified February 14, 2004, SCH No. 2002082057) and the Pistachio Park (F-56) Project Addendum to the WRSP EIR (approved June 2018).
According to CEQA, an Addendum to an adopted EIR can be prepared to address minor technical changes or project modifications (CEQA Guidelines § 15164). An Addendum is appropriate only if these minor technical changes or modifications do not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. The Addendum need not be circulated for public review (CEQA Guidelines § 15164 [c]); however, the Addendum is to be considered along with the adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Initial Study/Negative Declaration or EIR by the decision-making body prior to making a decision on the project (CEQA Guidelines § 15164 [d]).
The proposed project is consistent with the Addendum approved in 2018 and does not raise any new issues and does not exceed the level of impacts identified in the Addendum or WRSP EIR. All applicable mitigation measures from the WRSP EIR and Pistachio Park (F-56) Project Addendum to the WRSP EIR will be implemented as part of construction and design of the project. No additional CEQA review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
3. Enhance economic vitality
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning and Development Manager
Jill Nunes, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Resolution 26-316
3. Vision Plan
REVIEWERS:
Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Created/Initiated - 7/15/2026 Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 7/15/2026 Jill Nunes, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 7/29/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/4/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/6/2026
Vicinity Map
Panther Drive
WestPark Drive West Park High School
RESOLUTION NO. 26-316
APPROVING THE FIDDYMENT HOMESTEAD VISION PLAN
WHEREAS, the Fiddyment Homestead is located within Pistachio Regional Park, and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and WHEREAS, in 2024, Page & Turnbull, an architectural firm, began work on a Vision Plan for the historic Fiddyment Homestead; and
WHEREAS, the goal of the Vision Plan is to establish opportunities to renovate and develop a space for education and public use for a variety of events while maintaining its historical relevance; and
WHEREAS, the final draft of the Vision Plan considers the approved Pistachio Regional Park master plan and outlines a schematic design for the outdoor spaces in the front, side and back of the home; and
WHEREAS, the Fiddyment Homestead Vision Plan has been reviewed by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the Fiddyment Homestead Vision Plan is hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 1
March 2026
TITLE
TITLE (CONT)
CITY, STATE
[P10XXX]
PRIMARY PROJECT CONTACT:
Your Name Here, Title
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
415.593.xxxx / 415.362.5560 fax
[email protected]
ROSEVILLE, CA
PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Fiddyment
Homestead
Visioning
Vision Document
MARCH 2026
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 2
March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL iii Table of Contents
March 2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................5 Project Team ...............................................................................................................................................................5 Goals & Objectives .....................................................................................................................................................6 Project Background ...................................................................................................................................................6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...............................................................................................................8 History of the Fiddyment Homestead .....................................................................................................................8 Development Chronology .........................................................................................................................................10 Historic & Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................................11 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance ....................................................................................12 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards ......................................................................................................................12 Standards for Rehabilitation .....................................................................................................................................13 METHODOLOGY & PUBLIC OUTREACH ..............................................................................................15 What We Heard At Public Meeting #1 .....................................................................................................................15 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................19 Design Narrative ........................................................................................................................................................19 Landscape Treatment ................................................................................................................................................20 Preferred Landscape Concept ..................................................................................................................................24 Buildings & Structures Treatment ............................................................................................................................26 INTERPRETATION .....................................................................................................................................39 ANTICIPATED PHASING & IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................43 Recommended Project Phasing ...............................................................................................................................43 Cost Estimate Summary ............................................................................................................................................45 APPENDIX A: COST ESTIMATES .............................................................................................................47 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC MEETING #1 MATERIALS ................................................................................55 APPENDIX C: PUBLIC MEETING #2 MATERIALS ................................................................................65
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL iv Table of Contents
March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 5 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
The City of Roseville initiated the Fiddyment Homestead Visioning Project in 2023 to develop a plan for renovating the historic Main House of the Fiddyment Homestead and its immediate surroundings for public use. The project was funded through the West Roseville City-wide Park Development Fund.
The Fiddyment Homestead site is located on the north side of Panther Place, south of Pleasant Grove Creek, and northeast of Roseville’s city center in Placer County, California. The site encompasses 0.85 acres and represents the last remaining elements of the Fiddyment family’s vast agricultural holdings, which were first established in the Roseville area around 1879. Historic elements of the site include the Fiddyment family’s ranch house, built in 1879 and remodeled by the family through the 1950s; a brick cooler and smokehouse, built ca. 1879-1880; a 1950 garage; and associated landscaping around the house. The property was listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) in 2010.
INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW
PROJECT TEAM
City of Roseville
Tara Gee, Park Planning & Development Manager
Jill Geller, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Annie Stanco, Library and Cultural Arts Supervisor
Narinderpal Sufi, City Librarian
Page & Turnbull - Architecture
Lada Kocherovsky, Principal-in-Charge
Greg Yanito, Project Manager
Clare Flynn, Cultural Resources Planner
Kyungmin Hwang, Designer
Callander Associates - Landscape Architect
Melissa Ruth, Principal
Iqra Anwar, Project Manager
Olivia Patitucci, Designer
Figure 1: Fiddyment Homestead project location. Source: Google Maps, 2025. Edited by Page & Turnbull.
Hayden Parkway
Panther PlaceWestpark Drive
West Park
High School
FIDDYMENT HOMESTEAD
PROJECT SITE
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 6 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
3 Callander Associates, “Pistachio Regional Park Master Plan Update,” November 21, 2021.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Fiddyment Homestead site was deeded to the City of Roseville (City) in February 2017. The same year, the City began the process of planning for the protection and rehabilitation of the historic homestead as part of a broader longterm effort to develop a new 44-acre public park, Pistachio Regional Park, in West Roseville. Public outreach to develop a master plan for the park proceeded throughout 2017, and a draft was sent to City Council to approve, pending environmental review clearance, in October 2017.1 The master plan was originally approved by City Council in 2017 and updated and re-approved in June 2025 as the park vision has continue to evolve.
Simultaneously with the park master planning effort, the City initiated a separate effort to stabilize the historic buildings and structures at the Fiddyment Homestead. In 2017, architecture, planning, and design firm Page & Turnbull and a team of consultants were contracted to complete a comprehensive conditions assessment of the property and provide recommendations to stabilize the Fiddyment Ranch Main House and surrounding historic buildings, with the aim to protect the site’s historic integrity and enable possible future reuse and historic interpretation of the property. The four buildings and structures assessed during this project included the Main House, Cooler, Smokehouse, and Reservoir.2 Based on the findings and recommendations of the 2017 Conditions Assessment, the City completed the highest priority work to stabilize the Main House in 2018. This included installing a new roof, repairing dry rot, installing new downspouts, repainting the exterior of the building, and boarding the house up to secure it and prevent damage. The value of these improvements was in excess of $350,000.
1City of Roseville, “Pistachio Regional Park (F-56) Master Plan Approval,” Council Communication #9383, July 11, 2018.
The first phase of construction for Pistachio Regional Park - which included a baseball field, two softball fields, a restroom, and parking lot - began in 2019. Proposals to add a new community center and library, the relocation of items originally envisioned for Pistachio Regional Park to other sites, as well as other changes to the vision scoped in the original master plan presented an opportunity to review the master plan. Callander Associates completed an update to the Pistachio Regional Park Master Plan in 2021, resulting in City Council approval in 2025.3
In 2023, the City issued a Request for Proposals to solicit professional design services to develop a visioning plan to rehabilitate the Fiddyment Homestead site for future public use. Page & Turnbull was selected to lead the Fiddyment Homestead Visioning Project with landscape architecture firm Callander Associates (the Project Team).
2 Page & Turnbull, “Fiddyment Ranch Conditions Assessment and Stabilization Recommendations,” July 2017.
GOALS & OBJECTIVES
The project establishes the overarching vision for the Fiddyment Homestead and serves as the foundation for future projects and planning efforts at the property. Specifically, the plan provides recommendations to achieve the City of Roseville’s goal of transforming the Fiddyment Homestead into a public asset that protects, preserves, and interprets the property’s history and character. Furthermore, the plan reflects feedback received from the public with the intention of delivering a new public benefit that addresses the needs and desires of the surrounding community.
The objectives of rehabilitating the Fiddyement Homestead site are to:
1. Renovate the Fiddyment Homestead site as a new public amenity and community gathering space that is accessible and welcoming to all.
2. Design facilities and programing to complement the broader future vision for Pistachio Regional Park.
3. Preserve the ranch’s historic buildings and structures as important visual remnants of Roseville’s past.
4. Provide interpretive opportunities that highlight Roseville’s early American settler and agricultural history.
5. Maintain the rural character of the site as open green space and habitat for local wildlife
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 7 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
PISTACHIO REGIONAL PARK
MASTER PLAN UPDATE
11/21/2021
Limit of Work
Primary Pedestrian Circulation
Existing Bike Circulation
Future Bike Circulation
Vehicular Circulation
Maintenance Access
HAYDEN PARKWAY
PLAY AREA
PICNIC SHELTER
FIDDYMENT HISTORICAL SITE
PARKING
LOT
MAINTENANCE YARD
WEST PARK DRIVE
KEY LEGEND TREE LEGEND
Street Tree
Large Shade Tree
Screening Tree
Accent Tree
Existing Tree
Fiddyment House/Community Center Area: 10 Acre
Skate/BMX Area: 11 Acre
Sports Court Area: 6.5 Acre
Existing Sports Field Area: 16.8 Acre
PARKING INFORMATION
BMX SKILLS
COURSE
COMMUNITY
CENTER
PLAY AREA
PARKING LOT
SPLASH PAD
OVERFLOW PARKING LOT
SKATE PARK
+ PUMP TRACK
PARKING LOT
FUTSAL COURT X2
TENNIS COURT X3
PICKLEBALL COURT X6
OPEN SPACE
PARKING LOT
EXISTING
SOFTBALL FIELD
EXISTING
PARKING LOT
EXISTING
BASEBALL FIELD
PARKING
LOT
GARDEN
INFORMAL
DESTINATION
GARDEN
Figure 2: Pistachio Regional Park Master Plan Update, approved June 2025, prepared by Callander Associates, edited by Page & Turnbull. The Fiddyment Homestead site is highlighted yellow. 2025 Pistachio Regional Park Master Plan Update
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 8 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 9 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
The Preferred Alternative Plan for the Fiddyment Homestead reflects the project’s goals and objectives as well as extensive feedback from the Roseville community and City staff. The plan envisions the Homestead as a vibrant, multi-use public amenity capable of accommodating a wide variety of community activities. Central to this vision is the preservation of the historic Fiddyment family farmhouse, its associated structures, and the site’s open greenspace character.
These rare, irreplaceable historic elements form the foundation for connecting current and future generations to Roseville’s history and agricultural past. The first floor of the farmhouse will be regularly used as a museum and educational space, complemented by thoughtfully arranged interpretive displays, artifacts, and landscape features throughout the site. Flexibility will be provided to further expand educational exhibits and public programming to the second floor of the farmhouse in the future as funding becomes available.
Broadening the potential for public benefit, museum exhibitions inside the first floor of the Main House and a variety of lawns, patios, and garden spaces throughout the broader site will be designed in such a way that they can also host an assortment of year-round community gatherings and activities. The Garage will be adapted as a flexible multi-purpose space to support a broad range of community uses.
Recommended project phasing begins with stabilizing and repairing the existing historic buildings, cleaning and preparing the site, and providing an initial phase of parking. Rehabilitation of the front lawn and perimeter tree planting will follow to allow for outdoor public access to the front of the property while the interior of the farmhouse and rear landscaped areas are renovated. Adaptive reuse of the Garage will complete the envisioned project scope.
By preserving and celebrating the site’s historic character while offering amenities that appeal to diverse, evolving, and multi-generational audiences, the plan ensures that the Fiddyment Homestead will remain a cherished asset for Roseville residents for generations to come.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 10 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
HISTORY OF THE FIDDYMENT HOMESTEAD
The Fiddyment Ranch was founded in the 1850s by George and Elizabeth Jane Hill. Elizabeth and her son, Walter Fiddyment Jr., had moved to California from Illinois in 1853, a few years following the death of her first husband, Walter Fiddyment. Elizabeth and Walter Jr. first lived with family in the Elk Grove area, but later moved to the Pleasant Grove District, located west of Roseville, after her Brother-in-law gave her a parcel of land to repay a debt. This parcel was the initial holding that would eventually grow to be the Fiddyment Ranch, and by the turn of the century the family owned over 13,000 acres throughout Placer County.
In the late 1870s, Walter Fiddyment Jr. had acquired 80 acres of his mother’s ranch holdings, which he later expanded to approximately 2,000 acres. A simple single-story residence was located on the property and served as Walter’s initial farm house. In 1879, Walter married Ella Bond, who moved to his ranch properties. With the help of Augustus E.
Bond, Walter’s father-in-law and a master mason, they constructed the main ranch house, as well as several outbuildings, including the cooler, smokehouse, and reservoir. Grain production and cattle ranching would continue on the ranch, although irrigation and soil quality ultimately led to refocusing of Walter’s agricultural efforts on cattle and eventually sheep.
Walter and Ella had seven children, and sometime around 1910 expanded the house with a second-story addition above the kitchen.
In 1927, Walter and Ella moved to Roseville and left their son, Russell, and his wife, Cora, in charge of the ranch operations. In the years following, Russell began to focus the efforts of the ranch on raising turkeys. While
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Figure 3: Walter Fiddyment, standing in the front yard of the Fiddyment Homestead with two dogs and, presumably, two of his children (ca. 1890).
Source: Roseville Historical Society.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 11 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
the family had been raising turkeys on the property since the 19th century, Russell was the first one to raise and market turkeys on a commercial scale. This proved to be a successful venture, making turkeys and other poultry a hallmark of the Fiddyment Ranch from the 1930s well into the post-war years. Their success inspired nearby farmers to embrace the practice of raising turkeys, which led to the proliferation of Placer County as a center for the turkey industry.
In 1956, Russell Fiddyment passed away. The Fiddyment family continued to live and work on the farm over the following decades. Under the direction of David Fiddyment, Russell’s son, the family farm began to experiment with pistachio trees, starting in the 1960s. Although difficult to adapt to California, David Fiddyment continued his experimentations with pistachio production, which became an incredibly successful venture. The ranching of turkey and sheep at the original property continued, but decreased steadily until the early 1990s. David continued to grow and harvest pistachios, until shifting the pistachio operation to Southern California in the 2000s. Around the same time, the Fiddyment family sold the property.1 1 Christina Richter and David Fiddyment, Walk with Me, I Want to Tell you Something: The Story of the Roseville Fiddyment Family (Roseville:
Christina Richter and 3L Publishers, 2013); PAR Environmental Services, “National Register of Historic Places Registration Form – Fiddyment Ranch Main Complex,” June 2009.
Figure 4: The core area of the Fiddyment Homestead, undated. Source: Roseville Historical Society.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 12 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
1856 à The initial property was given to Elizabeth Jane from her Brother-in-law as payment for a debt. The ranch holdings were expanded to include thousands of acres over the following years.
ca.1860 à A simple single-story cabin was constructed at/near the location of the existing main ranch house.
1879 à Walter Fiddyment Jr. began construction of the main Ranch House. The original cabin structure and raised and utilized as the second floor with a new first floor was constructed underneath. A two-story cross-gable section was constructed at the north end of the house, which included the dining room at the first floor. A single-story section was constructed at the northeast corner as the kitchen. The new layout was set on a brick masonry foundation.
At least three brick masonry chimneys were constructed by A.E Bond: two flanking the primary two-story volume, and one located at the kitchen. à Cooler and Smokehouse constructed.2
ca.1880 à Barn was constructed west of the main ranch house. ca.1910 à Second story was added above the kitchen.
à The small single-story east kitchen was likely constructed at this time, along with the raised porch.
ca.1920 à A windmill was constructed adjacent to the Cooler. à A granary was constructed.
1929 à A single-story bunkhouse was constructed north of the main ranch house, near the smokehouse.
1930 à Barn was renovated.
1948 à The granary was converted to a turkey hatchery. 2 It is unclear if the cooler was initially constructed as a one- or two-stories, but photographs from ca.1900 do show it at two-story structure. If originally constructed only as the brick masonry first-floor, the cooler was heightened over decades that immediately followed.
1950 à The wrap around porch was removed. The east portion was enclosed at both the first and second floors, whereas the south portion was converted to a double-height portico. à Steel casement windows were installed at the primary (south) façade, the west façade, and the newly constructed enclosure at the east façade.
à The northwest balcony of the main house was enclosed. A new stairwell was built in this space, connecting the first and second floors.
à The living room of the main house was expanded to its current large configuration. à The garage was constructed east-adjacent to the main house. ca.1950 à The rear screened laundry enclosure was likely constructed at this time; however, the exact date of construction is unknown.
à The Cooler was reduced in height from two-stories to a single story. The wood framed upper portions were removed, leaving the brick masonry base that exists today. The hipped-roof appears to have been removed.3
à Barn was renovated.
ca. 1965 à David Fiddyment plants first pistachio trees on the property. 2002 à David Fiddyment shifts pistachio operation to Kern County in Southern California. à Property was sold.
ca. 2004 à Several outbuildings were demolished, including the barn, bunkhouse, and turkey hatchery. 3 The National Register nomination states that the cooler was reduced in height in 1910 with the removal of the original water tank.
However, video documentation of the property in 1948 clearly shows the cooler at two-stories. Fiddyment Ranch Footage (1948) courtesy of the Roseville Historical Society
DEVELOPMENT CHRONOLOGY
The following is a construction chronology of the Fiddyment Ranch Main Complex area. While the Fiddyment Ranch itself included thousands of acres, an examination of the evolution of the entire historic property is beyond the scope of this report. This chronology will focus on the area included within the boundaries of the National Register listed property. The period of significance for the Fiddyment Homestead property identified in the National Register listing is 1879 to 1956, spanning the initial construction of the existing ranch buildings through the passing of Russell Fiddyment, Sr.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 13 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
HISTORIC & CULTURAL RESOURCES
The Fiddyment Ranch is one of the oldest agricultural properties in Placer County, California. Originally settled around 1860, the property was in continuous use by the Fiddyment family through the 20th century and has evolved accordingly, currently exhibiting buildings, structures, and other features that were added between 1879 through the 1950s.
In 2010, the “Fiddyment Ranch Main Complex” was listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), which is the nation’s most comprehensive inventory of historic resources and is administered by the National Parks Service (NPS). Properties that are listed on the National Register are also automatically listed on the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). The National Register nomination determined that the property is significant at the local level as an example of an early agricultural settlement in the Roseville area and because of its overall role in the development of agriculture in the region (Criterion A/1).
It was also determined significant for its architecture (Criterion C/3) as the best representative example of a ranch and agricultural property in the Roseville area, as well as for the presence of archaeological materials that have the potential to yield additional information associated with developmental contexts during the periods of inhabitation and operation of the Ranch (Criterion D/4).1 The identified period of significance for the Fiddyment Ranch Main Complex spans from 1879 to 1956, extending from the initial construction of the existing ranch buildings through to the passing of Russell Fiddyment, Sr.
Contributing features of the historic property that are within the Fiddyment Homestead Visioning project boundaries include the Ranch House, Cooler, Smokehouse, Garage, and associated landscape features.2 1 Archaeological deposits identified in the National Register nomination are located outside the Fiddyment Homestead Visioning project boundaries.
2 A contributing reservoir, piping system, and areas of archaeological desposits are outside the boundaries of the Fiddyment Homestead Visioning project.
Figure 5: The Cooler (right foreground) and Smokehouse (left background), looking northeast, in 2024.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 14 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
Figure 6: The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties is available online through NPS.gov.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) COMPLIANCE
According to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a “project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.”3 Substantial adverse change is defined as: “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historic resource would be materially impaired.”4 The significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project “demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance” and that justify or account for its inclusion in, or eligibility for inclusion in, the California Register or a local register of historical resources.5 However, projects limited to maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of historical resources in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (the SOI Standards) have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment. As such, they are categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.6 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS
The SOI Standards provide guidance for reviewing proposed work on historic properties and are a useful analytic tool for understanding and describing the potential impacts of substantial changes to historic resources.
The Secretary of the Interior offers four sets of standards to guide the treatment of historic properties:
Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration, and Reconstruction.
Preservation: The Standards for Preservation “require retention of the greatest amount of historic fabric, along with the building’s historic form, features, and detailing as they have evolved over time.” Rehabilitation: The Standards for Rehabilitation “acknowledge the need to alter or add to a historic building to meet continuing or new uses while retaining the building’s historic character.” Restoration: The Standards for Restoration “allow for the depiction of a building at a particular time in its history by preserving materials from the period of significance and removing materials from other periods.” Reconstruction: The Standards for Reconstruction “establish a limited framework for recreating a vanished or non-surviving building with new materials, primarily for interpretive purposes.” Typically, one set of standards is chosen for a project based on the project scope. In this case, the proposed project scope is seeking to alter historic property for a new use. Therefore, the Standards for Rehabilitation will be the appropriate Standards for the proposed project at the Fiddyment Farmstead site. 3 CEQA Guidelines subsection 15064.5(b).
4 CEQA Guidelines subsection 15064.5(b)(1).
5 CEQA Guidelines subsection 15064.5(b)(2).
6 CEQA Guidelines subsection 15300 and 15331 (Categorical Exemption 31).
1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.
2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved.
The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided.
3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken.
4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved.
5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced.
Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.
8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place.
If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION
Figure 7: The Main House, view northeast (2024).
Vision Document - DRAFT Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Project Number 23315 Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 15 DATE
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 16 Introduction & Overview
March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 17 Methodology & Public Outreach
March 2026
METHODOLOGY & PUBLIC OUTREACH
The Project Team reviewed and summarized relevant background materials provided by City staff, including the Conditions Assessment and Stabilization Recommendations report, prepared by Page & Turnbull in 2017; the Pistachio Regional Park Master Plan Update, prepared by Callander Associates and approved in June 2025; as well as a and 2022 FuturePRL Strategic Master Plan.
In August 2024, the Project Team held a brainstorming work session with City staff and 17 key stakeholders, including representatives from the Roseville Historical Society, Roseville City School District, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Fiddyment Farm Neighborhood Association, and City of Roseville Libraries and Culture Division. Participants reviewed the opportunities and constraints identified by the Project Team and discussed potential approaches to achieve a side-wide vision for the Fiddyment Homestead.
A virtual public meeting was held in January 2025 to introduce the Project Team to the community and present relevant background information, goals and objectives, and relevant case studies for similar projects that could serve as examples for the Fiddyment Homestead vision. These case studies may contain small pieces of interpretation, larger adaptive reuse components, or full immersive experiences that could serve as test cases for what the community would like to see at the Fiddyment Homestead as part of the evolving Pistachio Park master plan. The community’s vision and desires for the Fiddyment Homestead site were gathered through a series of interactive virtual activities and survey questions (Refer to Appendix B).
Based on the feedback from the first public meeting, the Project Team developed two draft alternative concepts for the reuse of the homestead site and interpretive opportunities. Preliminary conceptual estimates were prepared for both of these alternatives in order to illustrate the level of investment required for each alternative.
WHAT WE HEARD AT PUBLIC MEETING #1
Community Priorities
• Repair, preservation, and long-term maintenance of the homestead’s historic buildings and structures
• History exhibits inside the Main House that tie the Fiddyment Homestead to broader Roseville history
• Outdoor spaces for community gatherings and events, such as farmers markets, weddings, small live performances, etc.
• Outdoor features for learning about local history and nature, including an outdoor classroom space
• Outdoor areas for picnics, walking, and other passive recreation General Site Needs for Public Access
• ADA compliance (accessibility upgrades)
• Restrooms
• Security
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 18 Methodology & Public Outreach
March 2026
Figure 8: Sample of community responses to interactive virtual questions during the first public meeting.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 19 Methodology & Public Outreach
March 2026
A second public meeting was held on July 31, 2025 at the offices of the City of Roseville’s Parks, Recreation and Libraries department in central Roseville. During the meeting, the two draft alternative concepts for the site, farmhouse, and garage were presented to the community through illustrative plans, drawings, and renderings along with a preliminary phasing plan to show how the project could be implemented over time.
Community members shared their thoughts through an open question and answer period and a series of interactive exercises (Refer to Appendix C).
The Project Team used the community feedback from the second public meeting and input from City staff to develop a “Preferred Alternative,” that best accommodates the needs and wants expressed during the public meetings, while preserving the historic integrity of the homestead. The Preferred Alternative materials—including illustrative plans, drawings, renderings, cost estimates, and a phasing plan to show how the project would be implemented over time—were shared with the community through the City of Roseville’s website and email newsletters for a final round of public review and comment.
The project team shared the recommended concept with Dolly Fiddyment and gathered additional knowledge and insights from her in a phone call in October 2025. These final comments were consistent with the feedback gathered from the community and were incorporated into the Preferred Alternative concept presented in this document.
Figure 9: Roseville community members participated in discussion and interactive activtiies to share their feedback during a second public meeting, which informed development of the Preferred Alternative concept for the Fiddyment Homestead.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 20 Methodology & Public Outreach
March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 21 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
DESIGN NARRATIVE
Based on feedback from community members and City of Roseville staff, the overarching objective for future programming and design of the Fiddyment Homestead emphasizes the following approach:
Preserving the historic character of the property while rehabilitating the landscape, buildings, and structures as flexible, multi-use community spaces that can accommodate a wide variety of uses.
The Preferred Alternative Plan for the Fiddyment Homestead responds to and reflects the commnity’s vision for the property, as shared during two public meetings in Janury and July 2025, respectively, as well as input from City of Roseville staff.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 22 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Future Vision Existing
Goals & Objectives
The proposed landscape enhancements to the homestead site are designed to support the uses of the historic buildings while offering educational, recreational, and community engagement opportunities.
The overall design intent emphasizes an organic, flowing layout with informal edges that guide users naturally through the site. The plan allows for the integration of various materials and the creation of flexible, multi-use spaces that accommodate a range of activities.
These improvements will help create a welcoming and inspiring environment for visitors of all ages.
LANDSCAPE TREATMENT
Kitchen Garden
The Kitchen Garden will serve as an inviting welcome area with seating and a shaded shelter. This space has the potential to include a historic garden along with interpretive signage of the site’s agricultural and planting history. The garden will include a mixture of native plants, herbs, vegetables, and flowers which will compliment interior improvements within the home, including the kitchen. The Kitchen Garden will also serve as a hands-on educational space, teaching visitors about plants, pollinators, and gardening.
Existing
Vision Document - DRAFT Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Project Number 23315 Roseville, CA
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 23 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
Front Lawn
Located at the front of the house, the Lawn is a formal green space that preserves the iconic view of the homestead while offering an open area for various uses. Whether it’s a family picnic, lawn games, or a wedding reception, this space provides a picturesque setting for both casual recreation and special events.
Rear Lawn
Located at the back of the house, the Rear Lawn is an informal green space designed to support both active and passive uses. It complements the adjacent patio area and can accommodate similar events as the front lawn, offering additional flexibility for community gatherings and private events.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 24 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
Vision Document - DRAFT Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Project Number 23315 Roseville, CA
The Patio
The Patio at the back of the homestead is reimagined as a multifunctional area that supports a wide range of community programs and private events. In addition to a large lawn, this space includes areas for small craft fairs, farmers markets, live music performances, and wedding ceremonies. The patio will also be enhanced by various landscape spaces with native plants, herbs, and flowers and include as ample space for seating and shade shelters.
Perimeter Trail & Fencing
Encircling the property, the Perimeter Trail will offer a quieter, more reflective experience for visitors. The trail will include passive seating areas with views of the homestead, along with interpretive signage and interactive historical displays. This trail will also help link the various spaces of the site, encouraging exploration and learning.
The site will be enclosed with fencing to ensure security. The design will include multiple gates, providing both pedestrian and vehicular entry points. These gates will support maintenance needs as well as event setup and breakdown, with clearly defined ingress and egress routes to facilitate efficient circulation throughout the site.
Existing Future Vision
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 25 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
Parking and Access
A newly planned parking area will improve access to the site, with a dedicated drop-off zone and bus turnaround to accommodate guests and group tours. The design will include space for bus loading, supporting visits by school groups. As the improvements adjacent to the homestead site continue to grow, this parking area is designed to phase in additional parking that will serve the future community building.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 26 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
PREFERRED LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
The recommended landscape concept for the Fiddyment Homestead organizes outdoor areas into distinct use zones, connected by a network of pathways that include both an internal route and a perimeter trail, allowing visitors to navigate the site with ease. These distinct use zones include: The Kitchen Garden, Front & Rear Lawns, The Patio, and Perimeter Trail.
Primary access to the homestead will be maintained from the east side, while the formal Front Lawn will reinforce the front face of the home, creating a grand view visible from Panther Place. Upon arrival, visitors will be greeted by a welcome and waiting area before proceeding to the house and/or supporting areas.
Strategically placed shade structures will enhance comfort and usability, while providing areas for rest and relaxation.
The perimeter trail offers an educational experience, featuring interpretive signage that highlights the site’s historic structures, including the historic Smokehouse and Cooler buildings. This trail not only connects visitors to the landscape but also will also deepen their understanding of the homestead’s historical significance.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 27 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
EVENT LAYOUT FARMERS MARKET LAYOUT
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 28 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Goals & Objectives
In public meetings, the community expressed a strong preference for rehabilitating the buildings and structures at the Fiddyment Homestead with a primary focus on providing historic interpretation and educational opportunities, while offering the flexibility to accommodate occasional small community events.
As previously described, the Fiddyment Homestead site is a designated historical resource and is considered part of the environment under CEQA.
To comply with CEQA and avoid adverse effects on the property’s historic significance, projects at the Fiddyment Homestead should comply with the SOI Standards.
Therefore, the recommended future vision for the buildings and structures is designed to meet the needs identified by the community and City staff, while complying with the SOI Standards. The Preferred Concept for the site involves stabiliziing and providing historic interpretation for the Cooler and Smokehouse, rehabilitating the Main House as a space primarily for regular historic exhibits and occasional small events, and rehabilitating the Garage as a classroom with public restrooms.
BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES TREATMENT
Figure 10: The Smokehouse (2024).
Figure 11: The Cooler (2024).
Structures for Stabilization & Historic Interpretation
COOLER & SMOKEHOUSE
Based on the 2017 Conditions Assessment and further review in 2024, the Cooler is in fair condition with some specific items that are in poor condition. The Smokehouse is in very poor condition with extensive deterioration and structural deficiencies that have made the building unstable. Both are recommended to be stabilized to repair the buildings, prevent further deterioration, and eliminate hazardous conditions that make them unsafe for public use. Due to their small footprints and limited capacity for viable new uses, the interior spaces would be closed to the public. The stabilized buildings would be augmented with exterior historic interpretive displays or signage, describing their original function and significance, and remain primary visual elements of the landscape and interpretive programming.
If desired, the Cooler could be alternatively rehabilitated to provide on-site storage for event materials and equipment, such as tables and chairs. It is estimated that the 165-square-foot building could fit three (3) Limerick chair carts, which hold up to a total of 108 chairs (36 per cart), plus two (2) Lifetime or Global Industrial table dolly/carts, which could hold up to 20 round 72” diameter tables (10 per cart). The final selection of carts would need to be able to fit through the existing door opening. In this instance, the building may need to be repaired to provide a secure, weathertight space, which would add additional cost to the overall project.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 29 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Structures for Reuse
MAIN HOUSE
Exterior
The Main House is in fair to good condition. Recommended priority exterior alterations consist of completing priority stabilization work, including retrofitting or replacing the brick masonry foundation; repairing damaged, deteriorated, or missing materials as needed to weatherproof and rodent-proof the house and prevent further deterioration; rehabilitating windows and doors; and repainting the exterior cladding.
Additionally, in order to allow for public access to the interior of the building, the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) must be met. Accessibility upgrades include adding a low ramp at the west side of the house and a raised deck, level with the finished floor at the south and west elevation. Although not required, recommendations also include installation of a railing and steps aligned with the front door that are compatible with the historic character of the building.
Further recommended alterations include installing fabric shade canopies over the new accessible ramp at the west side of the house and reopening a previously infilled window at the west elevation to provide more natural light to the living room space, as well as interpretive opportunities to reveal layers of physical alteratons to the building over time.
Figure 12: The front (south) facade of the Main House, view north (2024).
Approximate location of new raised deck indicated by light blue dashed line.
Figure 13: The east elevation of the Main House, view northwest (2024).
Figure 14: Photograph of the west elevation taken in the 1920s, showing the location of a window recommended to be reopened (outlined with dotted red line). Source: Roseville Historical Society.
Figure 15: The west elevation of the Main House, view east (2024). The location of a window recommended to be reopened is outlined with a dotted red line. The approximate location of a new raised deck is indicated by light blue dashed line.
Figure 16: The rear (north) elevation of the Main House, view south (2017).
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 30 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
FIDDYMENT HOMESTEAD VISIONING
DESIGN ITEMS - MAIN HOUSE
EXISTING PROPOSED
ADA RAMP RAILING STAIRREOPENED
WINDOW
AWNING
MAIN HOUSE EXTERIOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 31 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
FIDDYMENT HOMESTEAD VISIONING
DESIGN ITEMS - MAIN HOUSE
EXISTING PROPOSED
RAILINGSTAIR STAIR STAIR
MAIN HOUSE EXTERIOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 32 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
UP
UP
PASS-THRU
MUSEUM / INTERPRETIVE / EVENT
STORAGE
RECEPTION
RESTROOM
FLEXIBLE, MULTI-PURPOSE SPACE
MUSEUM OFFICE (ACCESSIBLE)
CIRCULATION
540 SF
188 SF
240 SF
KITCHEN / CATERING PREP
375 SF 360 SF
165 SF
215 SF
93 SF
60 SF
60 SF
60 SF
CONVERT EXISTING
WINDOW TO A DOOR, IF
NEEDED FOR EGRESS
18 SF
37 SF
(N) WALL
100 SF / PERSON
N/A
200 SF / PERSON
N/A
20 SF / PERSON
N/A
30 SF / PERSON
N/A
UP
75 SF
KEEP AREA IN FRONT OF
FIRE PLACE CLEAR FOR
POTENTIAL PODIUM / STAGE
FOR EVENTS
ENTRANCE TO MUSEUM /
EVENT SPACE
MOVABLE EXHIBIT
DISPLAY SHELVES ON
WHEELS
FAMILY FURNITURE /
ARTIFACTS (PERMANENT
DISPLAY), TYP.
INFILLED WINDOW HERE.
POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY
TO REVEAL/HIGHLIGHT
PHYSICAL CHANGES TO
HOUSE OVER TIME.
CONVERT EXISTING
WINDOW TO A DOOR
MUSEUM PATH OF TRAVEL
ACCESSIBLE RAMP
RAISED WOOD DECK WITH
RAILING AT FRONT ONLY
GARAGE
DOORS TO
REMAIN
OPERABLE
RECOMMENDED
LOCATION FOR FUTURE
ELEVATOR (IF NEEDED)
OCCUPANCY LOADS
SPACE PROPOSED
USE
USE
CATEGORY
AREA
(SF)
LOAD FACTOR
(SF / PERSON)
HOUSE -
LIVING
SPACES
MUSEUM /
INTERPRETIVE
/ EVENT
A-3
NUMBER OF
OCCUPANTS
780 30 26
HOUSE -
KITCHEN
KITCHEN /
CATERING PREP B 215 200 2
HOUSE -
KITCHEN OFFICE B 93 100 1
GARAGE -
INDOOR CLASSROOM A-3 375 20 19
GARAGE -
OUTDOOR CLASSROOM A-3 360 20 18
N
0’ 6’ 12’ 24’
N
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 33 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
DN
RESTROOM
FUTURE MUSEUM/GALLERY/EVENT SPACE
STORAGE
464 SF
407 SF
188 SF
85 SF
62 SF
N/A
N/A
100 SF / PERSON
RECOMMENDED
LOCATION FOR FUTURE
ELEVATOR (IF NEEDED)
OPEN WORK SPACE
CIRCULATION N/A
30 SF / PERSON
POTENTIAL WALL
TO REMOVE
POTENTIAL WALL
TO REMOVE
RECOMMEND RECONFIGURING
BATHROOMS IN FUTURE IF
NEEDED FOR ACCESSIBILITY
OCCUPANCY LOADS
SPACE PROPOSED
USE
USE
CATEGORY
AREA
(SF)
LOAD FACTOR
(SF / PERSON)
HOUSE -
LIVING
SPACES
UPPER FLOOR
OFFICE B
NUMBER OF
OCCUPANTS
407 100 5
HOUSE -
LIVING
SPACES
FUTURE MUSEUM
/GALLERY/EVENT
SPACE
B 464 30 16
N
0’ 6’ 12’ 24’
N
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 34 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
Sunroom
The recommended vision for the first floor is to rehabilitate it to accommodate a variety of community uses with a primary focus on providing opportunities for the public to learn about the history of the Fiddyment Homestead and Roseville’s 19th-century settlers through regular museum exhibits and educational displays.
The sunroom at the southeast corner of the first floor will serve as the main point of entry and reception area for visitors and school groups to the Main House. Visitors will have the opportunity to receive basic information about the Fiddyment Homestead, directions, and purchase tickets for tours or events as needed in this room before continuing on to the main exhibition spaces.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 35 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
Living Room and Dining Room
The main exhibition spaces will be located directly to the west in the living room and dining room. This plan envisions that these exhibition spaces will be flexibly designed, with artifacts and interpretive signage displayed along the perimeter walls. Additional moveable wheeled displays with additional artifacts and interpretive information, placed in the center of the rooms, could be temporarily stored in the dining room to accommodate small community events in the living room, as needed. These small events could consist of speaking engagements, live performances, small weddings, meetings, or other community activities.
In coordination with the broader future plans for Pistachio Regional Park, the living room and dining room could potentially be used to temporarily house a branch of the public library, while a new planned community center and library are constructed in the park.
In this scenario, the library would move from the Fiddyment ranch house into the new community center upon its completion.
There does not seem to be an immediate conflict that would impact historic integrity with this interim use; however to fully evaluate occupancy of the house as an interim library use, P&T recommends the City undertake a study that evaluates accessible access, egress requirements, fire and life safety related to a library use, as well as structural considerations that may impact the existing foundation in order to support an interim library function at this location.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 36 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
Kitchen & Restroom
The large existing kitchen will be updated to serve as a warming/ catering prep kitchen for events at the Fiddyment Homestead that contains modern, code compliant appliances and usable counter space. A commercial exhaust fan may be required if food preparation beyond re-warming and plating is desired.
The existing restroom to the east of the kitchen will be enlarged to provide facilities for staff. The restroom would be accessible from the kitchen and exterior stairs at the east side of the house. A portion of the existing kitchen adjacent to the sunroom could be converted to a small administrative office.
Screened-in Porch
The screened-in porch at the rear of the house offers opportunities to support the overall functionality of the Main House and homestead site to meet evolving programming needs. The porch could be used as a future option to add an additional public restroom cabin to serve larger capacity events. This would require converting the space to a fully finished and enclosed space and installation of plumbing, electrical, and HVAC systems in the space. Alternatively, if public access to the second story is desired to expand public programming offerings inside the Main House, the screened-in porch would be the recommended location to construct an elevator to the second floor.
Constructing an elevator at this location would have minimal impact on primary views of the house from surrounding existing and planned streets and minimize physical impacts on the historic exterior features of the house. However, adding an elevator would alter the upper floor’s exterior appearannce and should be completed in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 37 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
Second Floor
The second floor will be prepared so that it can accommodate a mixture of staff back-of-house uses and potential future public uses.
Rooms at the south side of the floor are recommended to be reused as a creative workspace for staff to prepare museum exhibit displays, school tour activities, and other materials for public events. Space would also be provided for the storage of portable historical artifacts and archival items, as well as other materials, which could be used in rotating exhibits.
If public access to the second floor is desired and feasible, rooms at the north side of the floor are recommended for adaptation as public gallery spaces that could be used to expand programming offerings at the homestead to include other types of exhibits and rotating events, such as community art exhibitions or exhibits that highlight elements of Roseville’s more recent history. Note that public access to the second floor would require ADA upgrades, such as the installation of an elevator, as described in the previous screened-in porch section.
The elevator would be located at the north (rear) side of the building and open directly into these public gallery spaces.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 38 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
Existing Future Vision
GARAGE
Although built during a later period of the homestead’s development in the mid-20th century, the Garage is considered historic and provides an opportunity for additional indoor/ outdoor community spaces, while addressing the need for accessible public restrooms at the site.
Expanding upon the overarching vision of flexibility, adaptibility, and wide-ranging public benefit at the Fiddyment Homestead, the Garage would be repurposed into a multi-purpose building for a variety of uses and activities. Potential public uses could include youth activities, educational or art classes, community meetings, birthday parties, a gift shop or refreshment stand, small practice space, and more.
Exterior
The Garage is in fair to good condition. Recommended exterior work includes completing regular maintenance and repairs as well as a seismic retrofit to prepare the building for public access. Minor exterior alterations to enhance public use of the building include replacing the roof and repainting the exterior cladding. Two existing window openings at the building’s west and south elevations will be converted into doors to provide access to the interior and into one of the new restroom cabins. New skylights will be added to the roof to bring natural lighting inside the building and minimize visual changes to its exterior.
To create a flexible public-use space, a new concrete slab will be poured at the exterior east side of the Garage. A new wood trellis will be added over the existing garage door openings to provide shade over an outdoor patio area, and new tables and seating will be installed. The existing garage doors will be refurbished to be safely opened and closed as needed in order to connect the indoor multi-use space with the new outdoor covered patio.
Interior
The interior of the Garage will be upgraded to create a comfortable climate-controlled space suitable for regular public use. This includes installing a new concrete floor, insulated and finished perimeter walls, lighting, ceiling fans, and HVAC system. Three accessible individual, gender-neutral restroom cabins, including an accessible restroom will be added within the west side of the building and reuse two existing exterior doors and the new door opening created by converting the existing window opening.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 39 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026FIDDYMENT HOMESTEAD VISIONING
DESIGN ITEMS - GARAGE
EXISTING PROPOSED
CANOPYGARAGE DOORS IN
OPEN POSITION
DOOR BENCH AND
TABLE
GARAGE EXTERIOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 40 Preferred Alternative Plan Recommendations March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 41 Interpretation
March 2026
The historic and scenic setting of the Fiddyment Homestead offers plentiful opportunities for public education and enrichment through a bespoke program of historic interpretation. Historic interpretation at the site will primarily consist of a series of signs and displays thoughtully arranged around the site to encourage the public to explore and gain a deeper understanding of the history and operation of the Fiddyment Homestead and its broader connections to the history of Roseville. Interpretation may also provide educational information on the natural history and ecology of the area.
Interpretive signage and programming may also present opportunities to connect the Fiddyment Homestead to other sites within the larger future planned development of Pistachio Regional Park. Located on farmland previously owned by the Fiddyment family, Pistachio Park contains the sites of other former historic buildings and structures (since removed) that were once part of the Fiddyment family’s agricultural holdings. As such, the preserved historic buildings and landscape at the Fiddyment Homestead project site could serve as the jumping off point to learn about the broader operation and layout of the Fiddyment family’s farmland and its connections to Roseville’s development over time.
INTERPRETATION
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 42 Interpretation
March 2026
Landscape Interpretation
Signs will be located at points of entry, along the perimter path running through the site, and in front of individual buildings, structures, or important landscape features to explain their history, use, and function.
Displays may also be developed that explore the agricultural history and natural ecology of the Fiddyment Homestead area, including information about native wildlife and ways in which 19th-century settlers utilized and altered the natural landscape.
The interpretive display signs will be designed so that they are compatible with the rustic feel of the homestead and are durable, long-lasting, require minimal maintenance, and can be easily cleaned.
It is recommended that a specialist be hired to develop an interpretive plan, which includes the specific content and comprehensive design for the interpretive displays and signage throughout the site. This will help ensure that the interpretive programming and infrastructure is well- coordinated across the site and meets accessibility requirements.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 43 Interpretation
March 2026
Main House Interpretation
The Main House presents an unparalleled opportunity to evoke the early American history of Roseville, through the example of the Fiddyment family and establishment of the Fiddyment Homestead.
Interpretive signs and graphics will be placed at the exterior of the house and throughout the first floor, exploring the history of the house and Fiddyment family and connecting them to the broader history of Roseville and the experiences of early American settlers. These will be accompanied by curated displays of artifacts, memorabilia, family photos, artwork, and other ephemera.
A recommended path of travel for visitors would begin at the reception area in the sunroom and wind through thematic displays arranged in the living room and dining room, which trace the typical journey of Roseville’s pioneer settler families from their arrival in the area and early efforts to set down roots to their role in creating the Roseville of today. Potential themes interpretive exhibits could explore include, but are not limited to the following:
1. Arrival of Pioneer Families: Experience what the journey to and arrival in the Roseville area would have been like in the 19th century, using the Fiddyment family as a primary example.
2. Putting Down Roots: Learn about how early American settlers established the foundations of Roseville (i.e. building houses and starting businesses).
3. Home Life: Delve into details about how Roseville’s farming families lived in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
4. Food/Agriculture: Explore how families like the Fiddyments impacted the natural landscape and agricultural development of the Roseville area.
Figure 19: Sampling of assorted historic photographs, showing life on the Fiddyment Homestead. Source: Roseville Historical Society.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 44 Interpretation
March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 45 Anticipated Phasing & Implementation March 2026
The City of Roseville envisions the rehabilitation of the Fiddyment Homestead as a long-term project, whose overall scope and timeline are dependent upon identifying and securing the required funding resources. To progress the project and ensure that the main priorities for the future of the Fiddyment site are met while all necessary funding is acquired, the project will be completed in phases.
Recommended phasing for completion of the project prioritizes the following goals:
• Preservation of the Fiddyment Homestead’s historic buildings and structures • Providing public access to portions of the site as soon as possible • Constructability, ensuring that work is completed in a logical, orderly, and efficient manner
RECOMMENDED PROJECT PHASING
The recommended project phasing for rehabilitation of the Fiddyment Homestead first prioritizes stabilizing the historic buildings to mitigate existing safety and condition issues, which will allow City staff and workers to safely access the site and halt further deterioration of the buildings while the rest of the site is rehabilitated.
Following this initial stabilization effort, Phase 2 would consist of basic site landscaping and preparation to remove tree stumps and debris, complete basic site regrading, install temporary fencing and site security measures, and provide parking and ADA acccommodations. This phase may also include completion of a paved parking lot adjacent to the Fiddyment Homestead site, which could be expanded in future phases of work to integrate into broader future plans for Pistachio Regional Park.
ANTICIPATED PHASING & IMPLEMENTATION
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 46 Anticipated Phasing & Implementation March 2026
Initial public access to the site would begin with the completion of Phase 3, during which the recommended scope for the Front Lawn and Kitchen Garden, including landscaping, planting perimeter shade trees, an entry seating area, and accessible pathways would be added at the front of the property. This would allow the public to recreate and enjoy the front portion of the Fiddyment property for a variety of outdoor community events, picnics, and passive recreation, while improving the visibility and appearance of the property from Panther Place. The recommended landscaping treatment for the rear portion of the site would not be completed during this phase to allow the rear of the property to be used as a staging area for construction materials, equipment, and trucks necessary for renovating the Main House and rest of the property. Temporary, but aesthetically compatible, fencing would be installed between the front and rear portions of the site to screen the rear staging area from public view during this phase.
In Phase 4, recommended interior upgrades and renovations to the Main House and Rear Patio would be completed, transforming it into an accessible, multi-use public building with regular public use as a place to learn about the history of the Fiddyment Homestead and Roseville’s broader agricultural and pioneer roots. If desired, the Main House could temporarily house a branch of the public library while a planned new community center and library is constructed in Pistachio Regional Park.
The recommended landscaping treatment for the rear portion of the site—including the Rear Lawn, Perimeter Trail, and rear gardens — would occur during Phase 5, offering expanded opportunities for outdoor programming and maximing public access to the site.
The project would conclude with rehabilitation of the Garage as a multi-purpose space for a range of public uses, further enhancing the range and variety of public use spaces at the Fiddyment Homestead.
Phase 1
• Stabilize Buildings (Address hazardous conditions, prevent further deterioration) Phase 2
• Base Landscape scope (Cleanup site, remove stumps, basic regrading, install fencing/site security, basic parking and ADA) to prepare for exterior site public access • Parking Lot Phase 1
Phase 3 (Public access begins)
• Front Lawn, Kitchen Garden, and Front Entry Paths
• Plant Perimeter Shade Trees
Phase 4
• House Base Adaptive Reuse Scope
• Additional House Adaptive Reuse Scope
• Rear Patio
Phase 5
• Rear Paths, Lawn, and Community Gardens
Phase 6
• Garage Base Adaptive Reuse Scope
• Additional Garage Adaptive Reuse Scope
Figure 20: Recommended project phasing approach.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 47 Anticipated Phasing & Implementation March 2026
BUILDINGS LANDSCAPE
Required Work
BUILDINGS PRIORITY STABILIZATION SITE PREPARATION
Total Cost: $600K - $800K (including markups) Total Cost: $325K - $375K PARKING LOT (PHASE 1)
MAIN HOUSE Total Cost: $450K - 500K
Total Cost: $1.5M - $2.25M (including markups)
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
GARAGE Total Cost: $15K - $30K
Total Cost: $250 - $350 (including markups)
CONTINGENCY
Total Cost: $500K - $600K
TOTAL FOR ALL REQUIRED WORK$1.3M - $1.5M
PREFERRED CONCEPT: ORGANIC LANDSCAPE
MAIN HOUSE (MUSEUM, KITCHEN, & OFFICES) Total Cost $750K - $850K Total Cost: $300K - $400K (includes markups)
GARAGE (CLASSROOM)
Total Cost $250K - $300K (including markups)
ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL
$4.9M-$6.5M
$2.9M-$4.1M $2M-$2.4M
PREFERRED CONCEPT: EDUCATION/HISTORIC INTERPRETATION FOCUS Total Building Rehabilitation Cost Estimates Total Landscape Cost Estimates Required Work
1. Required for any public access to site
2. Required for public access to building interiors
Additional Items Based on Selected New Use (Can Mix & Match) Additional Items Based on Selected New Use (Can Mix & Match)
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
J.R. Conkey and Callander Associates, with input from Page & Turnbull, prepared cost estimates for the Preferred Alternative Plan for the Fiddyment Homestead. To assist City staff planning efforts and set fundraising goals for phases of the project, the estimated costs have been broken down into two categories: 1) work that is required to make the site and interior of the Main House and Garage safe for public access by halting ongoing deterioration and resolving existing hazardous conditions, and 2) work that is necessary to achieve the desired future programming goals outlined in the Preferred Alternative Plan vision. This estimate was prepared in 2025 dollars. Costs shown should add a 3-5% escalator for each year after 2025.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 48 Anticipated Phasing & Implementation March 2026
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 49 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
APPENDIX A: COST ESTIMATES
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 50 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
PRINT DATE: 11/24/2025
PRINT TIME: 11:45 AM
PAGE 1 OF 13
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE BUILDING: SUMMARY MARKUP
PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES ESTIMATE DATE: JULY 16, 2025 PREPARED FOR: PAGE & TURNBULL
NO. OF TOTAL COST
UNITS SF PER UNIT
BUILDING
*NOTE (PLEASE SEE 'SUMMARY NO MARKUP' FOR RAW PRICE)
COST FOR EACH ITEM INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING MARKUPS:
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS & TESTING 3%
DESIGN PHASES AND FEES 15%
ESTIMATING CONTINGENCY 25 %
PHASING 15 %
TARIFF 15 %
ESCALATION TO BID 10%
ESCALATION FROM BID 3.33%
SITE, UTILITIES, LANDSCAPING OPTION 1
(ESTIMATE FROM CALLENDAR ASSOCIATES 37,089 $60.38 $2,239,393 $0 $2,239,393 MAIN HOUSE PRIORITY STABILIZATION SCOPE 3,460 $148.18 $512,690 $0 $512,690 ADDITIONAL SCOPE COMMON FOR BOTH CONCEPTS 1 & 2 3,460 $626.00 $2,165,943 $0 $2,165,943 MAIN HOUSE CONCEPT 1 (SMALL COMMUNITY EVENT FOCUS) 316 $809.07 $0 $255,666 $255,666 MAIN HOUSE CONCEPT 2 (EDUCATION/HISTORIC INTERPRETATION FOCUS) 316 $985.23 $0 $311,331 $311,331 GARAGE SCOPE COMMON FOR BOTH CONCEPTS 1 &2 613 $494 $302,530 $302,530 GARAGE CONCEPT 1 (GIFT SHOP) 613 $211 $129,263 $129,263 GARAGE CONCEPT 2 (CLASSROOM) 613 $406 $248,900 $248,900 COOLER 180 $409 $73,649 $0 $73,649
SMOKEHOUSE 395 $293 $115,910 $0 $115,910
TOTAL CONCEPT 1 3,460 $1,027.64 $3,555,651
TOTAL CONCEPT 2 3,460 $1,078.31 $3,730,954
QUALIFICATIONS:
1.) ESTIMATE ASSUMES DESIGN/BID/BUILD DELIVERY METHOD
2.) PRICING WITHIN THE ESTIMATE EXPECTS A MINIMUM OF 5 RESPONSIVE GENERAL CONTRACTOR BIDS ASSUMES FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION. IN OTHER WORDS, NO REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL BUSINESS, ETC.
3.) THE VARIANCE OF BIDS RECEIVED CAN AFFECT THE BID RESULTS, EXPECTATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1 bid +15% to +40%
2-3 bids +8% to +12%
4-5 bids -4% to +4%
6-7 bids -7% to -5%
8 or more bids -12% to -8%
4.) ESTIMATE EXCLUDES:
NON-CONSTRUCTION COSTS
FF&E - EXCEPT AS NOTED
MODULAR FURNITURE OR FURNITURE OF ANY TYPE
CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (CHANGE ORDER COST)
5.) THIS IS AN ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST, NOT A GUARANTEE.
6.) PRICES ON MATERIALS AND LABOR HAVE FLUCTUATED AND INCREASED TREMENDOUSLY SINCE COVID.
WE HAVE INCLUDED A HIGHER THAN NORMAL ESCALATION PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS. WE HAVE ALSO ADDED A MARK-UP FOR MARKET CONDITIONS, SUPPLY CHAIN, ETC.
7.) ESTIMATE PERFORMED ON CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT DRAWINGS BY PAGE & TURNBULL DATED 5/9/2025 (100 SHEETS).
8.) NOTE THAT DUE TO THE RECENT FIRES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IN JANUARY 2025.
9.) ESTIMATE EXCLUDES OFF-SITE WORK OUTSIDE PROPERTY LINES (EXCEPT SITE UTILITIES, PATCHING).
10.) NOTE THIS COST DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY CONTINGENCY IN THE EVENT THE BUILDINGS ARE DAMAGED OR REDUCED DUE TO WEATHERIZATION, FIRE DAMAGE, & DEFERRALS TO PROJECTS.
11.) ESTIMATE FOR THE PRIORITZATION SCOPE IS BASED ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATE DONE IN JULY 2017 FOR "FIDDYMENT RANCH CONDTIONS ASSESSMENT AND STABILIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS.
S U M M A R Y (WITH MARKUP)
TOTAL COST OF
ADD'L
RECOMMENDED
ITEMS
TOTAL COST OF
PRIORITY &
RECOMMENDED
ITEMS
C U R R E N T (PRELIMINARY)
TOTAL COST
OF PRIORITY
ITEMS
PRINT DATE: 11/24/2025
PRINT TIME: 11:45 AM
PAGE 2 OF 13
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE BUILDING: SUMMARY NO MARKUP
PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES ESTIMATE DATE: JULY 16, 2025 PREPARED FOR: PAGE & TURNBULL
NO. OF TOTAL COST
UNITS SF PER UNIT
BUILDING
SITE, UTILITIES, LANDSCAPING OPTION 1
(ESTIMATE FROM CALLENDAR ASSOCIATES 37,089 $32.40 $1,201,823 $0 $1,201,823 MAIN HOUSE PRIORITY STABILIZATION SCOPE 3,460 $79.52 $275,147 $0 $275,147 ADDITIONAL SCOPE COMMON FOR BOTH CONCEPTS 1 & 2 3,460 $335.96 $1,162,405 $0 $1,162,405 MAIN HOUSE CONCEPT 1 (SMALL COMMUNITY EVENT FOCUS) 316 $434.21 $0 $137,209 $137,209 MAIN HOUSE CONCEPT 2 (EDUCATION/HISTORIC INTERPRETATION FOCUS) 316 $528.74 $0 $167,083 $167,083 GARAGE SCOPE COMMON FOR BOTH CONCEPTS 1 &2 688 $236 $162,360 $162,360 GARAGE CONCEPT 1 (GIFT SHOP) 688 $101 $69,372 $69,372
GARAGE CONCEPT 2 (CLASSROOM) 688 $194 $133,578 $133,578 COOLER 262 $151 $39,525 $0 $39,525
SMOKEHOUSE 321 $194 $62,206 $0 $62,206
TOTAL CONCEPT 1 1,988 $959.87 $1,908,224
TOTAL CONCEPT 2 1,988 $1,007.20 $2,002,304
S U M M A R Y (NO MARKUP)
C U R R E N T (PRELIMINARY)
TOTAL COST OF
PRIORITY ITEMS
TOTAL COST OF
ADD'L
RECOMMENDED
ITEMS
TOTAL COST OF
PRIORITY &
RECOMMENDED
ITEMS
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 51 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
3 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 PRIORITY STABILIZATION SCOPE MAIN HOUSE 3127 BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 MAIN HOUSE - EXTERIOR
A FOUNDATION: STRUCTURAL BRICK
1 CEMENT PLASTER - PATCH/REPAIR MISSING PLASTER 3 SF $55.00 $165 $0 2 MORTAR - REPOINT FOUNDATION BRICK 110 LF $7.00 $770 $0 B WALLS: SHINGLES
1 PAINT - REPAINT AREAS OF DETERIORATION OR LOSS 40 SF $7.00 $280 $0 C WALLS: WOOD SIDING
1 WOOD SIDING - REPAIR 3 SF $43.00 $129 $0
2 V-EDGE BOARDS - MISSING TRIM 1 LF $85.00 $85 $0
3 PAINT - (PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED) 0 SF $7.00 $0 $0
D OPENINGS - STEEL WINDOWS
1 10 SF $33.00 $330 $0
2 GLAZING - REPLACE CRACKED WINDOW PANE 1 PANE $85.00 $85 $0 3 PAINT - REPAINT ALL WINDOWS 21 WINDOWS $125.00 $2,625 $0
E OPENINGS - WOOD WINDOWS
1 FRAMES SASHES & TRIM - REPAIR DAMAGED WINDOWS 1 SASH $250.00 $250 $0 TRIM 4 LF $40.00 $160 $0
2 GLAZING - REPLACE WINDOW PANE 1 PANE $85.00 $85 $0
3 SCREENS - REPLACE TORN SCREENS 24 SF $85.00 $2,040 $0 4 PAINT - REPAINT (SEE ABOVE) 12 WINDOWS $125.00 $1,500 $0
F OPENINGS - VINYL WINDOWS
1 PAINT - REPAINT AREAS OF DETERIORATION OR LOSS 2 WINDOWS $225.00 $450 $0
G OPENINGS - WOOD DOORS
1 DOOR & FRAME - JAMB 3 LF $120.00 $360 $0
JOINT REPAIR 1 EA $85.00 $85 $0
2 HARDWARE LOCK 1 EA $1,200.00 $1,200 $0
HINGE 1 EA $325.00 $325 $0
3 PAINT - REPAINT AREAS OF DETERIORATION OR LOSS 7 DOORS $800.00 $5,600 $0 H OPENINGS: ROOF GABLE VENTS
1 PAINT - REPAINT AREAS OF DETERIORATION OR LOSS NONE $0 $0 I ROOF: WOOD SHINGLES (PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED)
J ROOF: ASPHALT SHINGLES (PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED)
K ROOF: WOOD CORNICE, FASCIA & TRIM (PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED) L ROOF: BRICK CHIMNEYS (PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED)
M SOUTH PORCH:WOOD CEILING
1 WOOD BOARD 10 SF $120.00 $1,200 $0
2 PAINT - REPAINT AREAS OF DETERIORATION OR LOSS 40 SF $7.00 $280 $0 N SOUTH PORCH:WOOD COLUMNS
1 WOOD COMPONENTS - COLUMN BASES5 BASES 40 SF $140.00 $5,600 $0 2 PAINT - SEE ABOVE FOR SIDING ETC. 400 SF $7.00 $2,800 $0
METAL FRAMES & SASHES - TREAT AREAS OF
CORROSION
4 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 PRIORITY STABILIZATION SCOPE MAIN HOUSE 3127 BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
R NORTH PORCH: CEILING
1 WOOD BOARD 15 SF $60.00 $900 $0
S WEST PORCH
1 CONCRETE STEPS - MITIGATE ANNIMAL BURROW 8 HR $104.00 $832 $0 T EXTERIOR PATIO FLOOR: CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE
1 JOINT SEALANT 40 LF $6.00 $240 $0
U RAINWATER GOODS: GUTTERS (PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED)
V RAINWATER GOODS: DOWNSPOUTS (PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED)
W MECHANICAL: VENT
1 VENT FITTING 1 EA $600.00 $600 $0
X MECHANICAL: SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
1 MAINTENANCE 1 LS $11,450.00 $11,450 $0
Y ELECTRICAL: LIGHTING
1 NEW EXTERIOR FIXTURES WITH MOTION DETECTORS 3 EA $2,800.00 $8,400 $0
Z FIRE PROTECTION
1 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 3,127 SF $44.00 $137,588 $0
2 MAIN HOUSE - INTERIOR - NONE
SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $186,414 $0
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $37,283 $0
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $44,739 $0
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $6,711 $0
SUBTOTAL $88,733 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $275,147 $0
ITEMS O, P, Q INCLUDED IN PAINT ABOVE
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 52 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
5 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 ADDITIONAL SCOPE COMMON FOR BOTH CONCEP BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 MAIN HOUSE - EXTERIOR ADDITIONAL ITEMS
1 RE-SECURE COLUMN BASES 5 EA $250.00 $1,250 $0
2 ADD LOW-SLOPE WOOD ADA RAMP (W/O RAILING) 350 SF $45.00 $15,750 $0 3 LIGHTWEIGHT CANVAS CANOPY OVER ADA RAMP 350 SF $15.00 $5,250 $0 4 ADD RAISED WOOD DECK, RAILING, STEPS @ FRONT PORCH 355 SF $35.00 $12,425 $0 5 REBUILD (E) LANDING & STAIRS @ EAST ELEVATION 150 SF $20.00 $3,000 $0 6 CONCRETE FOUNDATION 1,900 LF $33.00 $62,700 $0
$0
2 MAIN HOUSE - INTERIOR $0
1 SEISMIC UPGRADE 1,900 SF $42.00 $79,800 $0
2 NEW HVAC SYSTEM 1,900 SF $75.00 $142,500 $0
3 NEW ELECTRICAL WIRING - RECEPTACLES 1,900 SF $55.00 $104,500 $0 4 NEW TELECOM WIRING 1,900 SF $14.00 $26,600 $0
5 NEW PLUMBING $0
WATER CLOSET 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500 $0
SINK 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500 $0
KITCHEN 4 FIXT $4,200.00 $16,800 $0
6 EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHTING / SIGNAGE 8 EA $1,400.00 $11,200 $0 7 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 1,900 SF $44.00 $83,600 $0
8 FLOOR FINISHES $0
DEMO CARPET (SUN, LIVING, DINING, STAIR LANDING) 1,900 SF $2.00 $3,800 $0 REFINISH WOOD FLRG - 1SF FLOOR (EXCL KIT/BATH) 1,547 SF $33.00 $51,051 $0 KITCHEN / BATH FLOOR FINISHES 353 SF $42.00 $14,826 $0
9 REPAINT WALLS - FIRST FLOOR 1,900 SF $7.00 $13,300 $0 10 NEW INTERPREATIVE & DISPLAYS (LIVING/DINING) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 $0 11 STAFF-ONLY RESTROOM 37 SF $330.00 $12,210 $0
12 PANTRY WITH CABINETS AT (E) LAUNDRY 1 LS $11,000.00 $11,000 $0 13 NEW WINDOW COVERINGS AT FIRST FLOOR 15 EA $565.00 $8,475 $0 14 OTHER FF&E 1,900 SF $24.00 $45,600 $0
15 INSULATION BOTH INT/EXT 1,900 SF $21.00 $39,900 $0
SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $787,537 $0
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $787,537 $0
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $157,507 $0
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $189,009 $0
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $28,351 $0
SUBTOTAL $374,868 $0
6 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 ADDITIONAL SCOPE COMMON FOR BOTH CONCEP BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $1,162,405 $0
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 53 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
7 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 SMALL COMMUNITY EVENT FOCUS 316 BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 MAIN HOUSE - CONCEPT 1 SMALL COMMUNITY EVENT FOCUS
1 MEETING SPACE (LIVING AND DINING ROOMS) 1,900 SF $15.00 $0 $28,500 CONTEMPORARY LIGHTING 1 EA $1,600.00 $0 $1,600
CONFERENCE TABLES AND CHAIRS 1 EA $3,200.00 $0 $3,200
2 RENOVATE (E) KITCHEN 'DEMONSTRATION KITCHEN' 316 SF $110.00 $0 $34,760 COMMERCIAL RANGE & HOOD 1 EA $5,000.00 $0 $5,000
DISHWASHER 1 EA $3,500.00 $0 $3,500
LARGE COUNTER / ISLAND 10 LF $1,000.00 $0 $10,000
CABINETS / SHELVING 1 EA $5,000.00 $0 $5,000
STOOLS 7 EA $200.00 $0 $1,400
SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $0 $92,960
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $0 $18,592
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $0 $22,310
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $0 $3,347
SUBTOTAL $0 $44,249
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS & MARK-UPS $0 $137,209
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $0 $137,209
8 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 EDUCATION/HISTORIC INTERPRETATION FOCUS BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 MAIN HOUSE - CONCEPT 2 EDUCATION / HISTORIC INTERPRETATION FOCUS 1 NEW MUSEUM/EXHIBIT SPACE IN LIVING ROOM/DINING ROOM 1,900 SF $13.00 $0 $24,700 TRACK LIGHTING 1 LS $2,700.00 $0 $2,700
EXHIBIT DISPLAYS 1 LS $3,000.00 $0 $3,000
WHEELED INTERPRETIVE DISPLAYS 1 LS $2,800.00 $0 $2,800
RECEPTION DESK 1 LS $2,500.00 $0 $2,500
REFINISHED INTERIOR FLOORS 1 LS $3,000.00 $0 $3,000
REFINISHED INTERIOR WALLS 1 LS $2,500.00 $0 $2,500
INTERIOR FURNITURE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,500.00 $0 $1,500 2 RENOVATE (E) KITCHEN 'CATERING/PREP KITCHEN' 215 SF $100.00 $0 $21,500 SINK 1 LS $3,500.00 $0 $3,500
WARMING RACKS 1 LS $7,500.00 $0 $7,500
3 CONVERSION/RENOVATE 'UPSTAIRS' TO OFFICES 316 SF $100.00 $0 $31,600 REFINISHED INTERIOR FLOORS 1 LS $3,000.00 $0 $3,000
REFINISHED INTERIOR WALLS 1 LS $2,200.00 $0 $2,200
INTERIOR FURNITURE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,200.00 $0 $1,200 SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $0 $113,200
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $0 $22,640
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $0 $27,168
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $0 $4,075
SUBTOTAL $0 $53,883
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $0 $167,083
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 54 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
9 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 GARAGE SCOPE COMMON FOR BOTH CONCEPTS 1 &2 BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 GARAGE - EXTERIOR
1 PREP & PAINT EXTERIOR 1,000 SF $3.00 $3,000 $0
2 RE-USE (E) DOOR OPENING 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500 $0
3 CONVERT (E) WINDOW OPENINGS TO DOOR OPENINGS 3 EA $3,500.00 $10,500 $0 4 NEW SKYLIGHTS 2 EA $3,000.00 $6,000 $0
2 GARAGE - INTERIOR
1 COMPLETE SEISMIC UPGRADE 1,000 SF $25.00 $25,000 $0
2 NEW CONCRETE TOPPING 1,000 SF $4.00 $4,000 $0
3 GYPSUM BOARD ON WALLS (PAINT) 1,000 SF $10.00 $10,000 $0 4 INSULATION 1,000 SF $5.00 $5,000 $0
5 ADD RESTROOM STALLS 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000 $0
6 INSTALL NEW CEILING LIGHTING 1,000 SF $8.00 $8,000 $0 7 INSTALL NEW CEILING FAN 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 $0
8 INSTALL NEW HVAC SYSTEM 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 $0
SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $110,000 $0
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $22,000 $0
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $26,400 $0
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $3,960 $0
SUBTOTAL $52,360 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $162,360 $0
10 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 GARAGE - CONCEPT 1 (GIFT SHOP) BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 GARAGE - EXTERIOR (CONCEPT 1)
1 PERMANENTLY PROP OPEN GARAGE DOORS 2 EA $500.00 $0.00 $1,000 2 INFILL GLAZING STOREFRONT SINGLE DOOR 1 EA $8,500.00 $0.00 $8,500 2 GARAGE - INTERIOR (OPTION 1)
1 INSTALL ASSORTED SHELVING, DISPLAY CASES & TABLES 70 LF $500.00 $0 $35,000 2 INSTALL DESK & WIFI 1 LS $2,500.00 $0 $2,500
SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $0 $47,000
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $0 $9,400
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $0 $11,280
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $0 $1,692
SUBTOTAL $0 $22,372
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $0 $69,372
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 55 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
11 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 GARAGE - CONCEPT 2 (CLASSROOM) BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 GARAGE - EXTERIOR (CONCEPT 2)
1 NEW CONCRETE SLAB (EAST SIDE OF BLDG) 1 LS $4,000.00 $0 $4,000 2 NEW WOOD TRELLIS (EAST SIDE OF BLDG) 1 LS $50,000.00 $0 $50,000 3 REFURBISH GARAGE DOORS 2 EA $3,500.00 $0 $7,000
4 TABLES AND CHAIRS 1 EA $4,500.00 $0 $4,500
2 GARAGE - INTERIOR (OPTION 2)
1 ADD TABLES & CHAIRS FOR 20 STUDENTS 1 LS $5,000.00 $0 $5,000 2 INSTALL CLASSROOM SHELVING & DISPLAY CASES 50 LF $400.00 $0 $20,000 SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $0 $90,500
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $0 $18,100
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $0 $21,720
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $0 $3,258
SUBTOTAL $0 $43,078
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $0 $133,578
12 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 PRIORITY STABILIZATION SCOPE COOLER BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 COOLER - EXTERIOR
A WALLS: BRICK
1 MORTAR - REPOINT FOUNDATION BRICK 152 LF $5.00 $760 $0
B OPENINGS - WOOD DOORS
1 HARDWARE 1 SET $1,200.00 $1,200 $0
2 NEW LOCKABLE WOOD DOOR IN (E) DOOR OPENING 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500 $0
C OPENINGS - WOOD SHUTTERS
1 SHUTTER & FRAME 3 SHUTTERS $750.00 $2,250 $0
2 HARDWARE 6 HINGES $60.00 $360 $0
D OPENINGS: VENTS
1 NEW SCREEN 1 LS $80.00 $80 $0
E ROOF: WOOD SHINGLES
1 SHINGLES (REMOVE/REUSE) (NEW 1/2" PLY & WP MEMBRA 300 SF $9.00 $2,700 $0 2 UNDERLAYMENT 260 SF $1.00 $260 $0
F ROOF: GUTTERS
1 REPAIR GUTTER 15 LF $10.00 $150 $0
G ELECTRICAL: SERVICE
1 REMOVE OVERHEAD FEED 1 EA $1,200.00 $1,200 $0
H SITE DRAINAGE
1 CLEAR LANDSCAPING, ADD DECOMPOSED GRANITE 180 SF $10.00 $1,800 $0 2 COOLER - INTERIOR
A REPLASTER WALLS (75%) 320 SF $35.00 $11,200 $0
B NEW CEILING LIGHT / SWITCH 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000 $0
C REPAIR CRACKS AT CONCRETE SLAB 64 SF $5.00 $319 $0
SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $26,779 $0
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $5,356 $0
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $6,427 $0
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $964 $0
SUBTOTAL $12,747 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $39,525 $0
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 56 Appendix A: Cost Estimates
March 2026
13 of 13
11/24/2025
11:45 AM
25-07-18 P&T - Fiddyment Farms Stablization Conceptual Estimate - R9_noHighlight
ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA - PARKS RECREATION & LIBRARIES DEP'T PROJECT: FIDDYMENT FARM - HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL REHABILITATION & REUSE PHASE: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN
ESTIMATE DATE:JULY 16, 2025 PRIORITY STABILIZATION SCOPE SMOKEHOUSE BID DATE: JUNE 2027
PREPARED BY: JR CONKEY & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
UNIT FIRST ADDITIONAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRIORITY RECOMMENDED
1 SMOKEHOUSE - EXTERIOR
A EXTERIOR TOWER WALLS: BRICK
1 BRICK 320 SF $40.00 $12,800 $0
2 MORTAR - REPOINT 2,100 LF $4.00 $8,400 $0
B EXTERIOR TOWER WALLS: FRAMING AT WOOD SIDING
1 WOOD FRAMING AT SIDING 25 LF $25.00 $625 $0
2 NEW 4X6 POST 1 LS $350.00 $350 $0
C EXTERIOR TOWER WALLS: WOOD SIDING
1 WOOD SIDING 10 SF $25.00 $250 $0
D EXTERIOR SHED WALLS: WOOD SIDING
1 WOOD SIDING 20 LF $250.00 $5,000 $0
E TOWER OPENINGS: WOOD DOOR
1 HARDWARE LOCK 1 EA $1,200.00 $1,200 $0
HINGE 2 EA $320.00 $640 $0
F TOWER OPENINGS: VENT
1 VENT COVER 2 WINDOWS $100.00 $200 $0
2 HARDWARE 8 HINGES $350.00 $2,800 $0
G SHED OPENINGS: BARN DOOR
1 HARDWARE LOCK 1 EA $1,200.00 $1,200 $0
HINGE 4 EA $320.00 $1,280 $0
H ROOF: CORRUGATED METAL
1 CORRUGATED METAL 200 SF $0 $0
I ROOF: WOOD RAFTER TAILS
1 SPLICE NEW RAFTER TAILS 10 EA $120.00 $1,200 $0
J ROOF: WOOD SHEATHING
1 1/2" PLY SHEATHING 200 SF $8.00 $1,600 $0
K ROOF: WOOD FASCIA/TRIM
1 WOOD FASCIA/TRIM 30 LF $16.00 $480 $0
L SITE DRAINAGE
1 CLEAR LANDSCAPING, ADD DECOMPOSED GRANITE 180 SF $9.00 $1,620 $0 2 SMOKEHOUSE - INTERIOR - NONE
A TOWER ROOF: BRICK CHIMNEY
1 BRICK CHIMNEY 100 SF $25.00 $2,500 $0
SUBTOTAL HARD COSTS $42,145 $0
CONSTRUCTION OVERHEAD
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.00% $8,429 $0
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.00% $10,115 $0
INSURANCE & BONDS 2.50% $1,517 $0
SUBTOTAL $20,061 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $62,206 $0
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 57 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC MEETING #1 MATERIALS
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 58 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Fiddyment Homestead
Visioning Plan
Public Meeting #1
January 14, 2025
Agenda
Introductions – Project Team
Project Background
Existing Site Conditions
Case Study Examples
Interactive Activity
Q&A
Project Team
Iqra Anwar, PLA, CPSI
Project Manager
Project Team
Project Planning and Progress to Date
2004-2017
2004 – West
Roseville Specific
Plan EIR completed.
2010 – Fiddyment
Ranch Complex
listed on National
Register
Some buildings
demolished by
developer
2017
City acquires site F-
56 (Historical
Fiddyment House
and park site)
Master Plan effort
for Pistachio
Regional Park
begins
Page & Turnbull
completes
Conditions
Assessment for
farmhouse
2018
July 2018 - Pistachio
Regional Park
Master Plan
approved
House stabilized
(new roof,
addressed dry rot
and downspouts,
repainted exterior)
Entered temporary
5-year right of
entry agreement
with Roseville
Historical Society
for basic landscape
maintenance
2019-2022
2019 – Phase 1
park construction
began (ballfield,
parking, 2 softball
fields, restroom)
2022 - Parks,
Recreation and
Libraries Strategic
Master Plan
(FuturePRL)
completed
2023
Need to locate a
new community
center and library
and changes to
soccer complex
plans created
opportunity to
review the
Pistachio Regional
Park Master Plan
High school built
own tennis courts
Universally
accessible
playground moved
to new Roseville
Soccer Complex
Slide 1 Slide 2
Slide 3 Slide 4
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 59 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Project Background
Vision, Goals, & Objectives
▪ Revised vision for Pistachio Park from public feedback (Dec. 2023):
o Multi-story community center and library
o Amphitheater/garden
o Spray pad/play area
o Destination skate track and BMX course
o Tennis, futsal, & pickleball courts
o Additional parking
▪ Goals & Objectives for Fiddyment Homestead:
o Preserve Ranch House & surroundings for public
use
o Provide accessible interpretive opportunities
o Connect site to broader history of Roseville
▪ Held brainstorming session with key stakeholders
▪ Reviewed site opportunities & constraints
▪ Discussed approach to achieve a site-wide vision
for homestead site
2021 Pistachio Regional Park Master Plan Update
Project Boundary
Opportunity Area 1: Kitchen Garden (Side Yard)
Potential New Uses & Functions:
• Welcome Area
o Orient visitors (maps, signs,
etc.)
o Interpretive history displays
• Break/Waiting Area
o Seating to wait for tours/events
(i.e. school tours)
o Picnic area
Slide 5 Slide 6
Slide 7 Slide 8
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 60 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Opportunity Area 1: Kitchen Garden (Side Yard)
Potential Program Elements:
• Welcome area
• Seating area
• Historic garden
• Learning opportunity
Opportunity Area 2: The Lawn (Front Yard)
Potential New Uses & Functions:
• Eye-catching view from street
o Attract visitors to site
• Photograph opportunities
o Weddings
o Other events
Opportunity Area 2: The Lawn (Front Yard)
Potential Program Elements:
• Formal lawn
• Event space
• Photo area
• Picnic area
Opportunity Area 3: The Patio (Rear Yard)
Potential New Uses & Functions:
• Outdoor event/gathering space
• Interpretation of smokehouse and
cooler
• Educational programming
• Garden
• Connections to surrounding
Pistachio Park amenities
• Visual and physical connections
• Security
Slide 9 Slide 10
Slide 11 Slide 12
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 61 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Opportunity Area 3: The Patio (Rear Yard)
Potential Program Elements:
• Formal lawn
• Event space
• Photo area
• (Shaded) Picnic area
Opportunity Area 4: Farmhouse
Potential New Uses & Functions:
• Museum element
• Small events/gatherings
• Full-service kitchen
• Accessible restrooms
• Office space for staff for museum
tours/administration
• Wedding party prep and hospitality
• Storage for house
Opportunity Area 5: Garage
Potential New Uses & Functions:
• Gift shop/limited refreshments
o Fiddyment Homestead visitors
o Future community center users
o Special event guests
• Accessible restrooms
• Museum storage
• Indoor classroom
Constraints
• Farmhouse Accessibility
• Ramp to 1st Floor
• Access to 2nd Floor (if desired)
• Accessible restrooms
• Building Conditions & Systems Upgrades
• Structural issues
• Mechanical, electrical, plumbing code
upgrades
• Power
• Air conditioning
• Traffic & Parking From Adjacent Development
• High school
• Future community center
• Landscaping Conditions
• Transition from rural setting to surrounding
park
• Loss of trees
• Invasive species dominate
• Lack of shade
• Views blocked
• Ongoing Funding Sources
Slide 13 Slide 14
Slide 15 Slide 16
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 62 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Case Studies
o Bernhard Museum,
Auburn
o C.F. Lott Home, Oroville
o Oxnard Historic Farm
Park, Oxnard
o Ardenwood Historic
Farm, Fremont
Case Study: Bernhard Museum
• Visitation: approx. 8,000/year
Case Study: C.F. Lott Home
1067 Montgomery Street,
Oroville, CA 95965
Case Study: Oxnard Historic Farm Park
• Visitation: approx. 6,600/year
Slide 17 Slide 18
Slide 19 Slide 20
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 63 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Case Study: Ardenwood Historic Farm
• Visitation: approx. 100,000/year
Interactive Activity
Visit: https://www.menti.com/alvo83c2c59i
or use the QR Code below:
Q & A
Thank you!
Additional comments or
feedback?
Contact
[email protected]
Slide 21 Slide 22
Slide 23 Slide 24
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 64 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Slide 25 Slide 26
Slide 27 Slide 28
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 65 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Slide 29 Slide 30
Slide 31 Slide 32
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 66 Appendix B: Public Meeting #1 Materials March 2026
Slide 33 Slide 34
Slide 35 Slide 36
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 67 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
APPENDIX C: PUBLIC MEETING #2 MATERIALS
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 68 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
Fiddyment Homestead
Visioning Plan
Public Meeting #2
July 31, 2025
Meeting Agenda
• Introductions
• What We’ve Heard From
You
• Alternative Concepts
• Project Phasing
Discussion
• Group Discussion
Goals & Objectives for
Fiddyment Homestead:
1. Preserve historic
buildings &
surroundings for
public use
2. Provide accessible
interpretive
opportunities
3. Connect site to
broader history of
Roseville
PPrroojjeecctt LLooccaattiioonn && BBoouunnddaarryy
Westpark Dr.
West Park
High School
Fiddyment
Homestead
Project Site
Slide 1 Slide 2
Slide 3 Slide 4
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 69 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
CCoommmmuunniittyy FFeeeeddbbaacckk –– WWhhaatt WWee’’vvee HHeeaarrdd FFrroomm YYoouu Wants
• Preservation of historic buildings
• Space for community gatherings and
events
• i.e. Farmers markets, weddings,
small concerts, etc.
• Educational spaces and programming
• History (artifacts, interpretive
signs, displays, exhibits)
• Agriculture (demonstrations,
gardening, honeybees, etc.)
• Highlight local foods, crafts, and products
• Areas to picnic, eat, and relax
• Preservation of open space, wildlife
habitats, and natural beauty
• Walking paths
Needs
• ADA compliance
• Restrooms
• Security
• Funding
• Phased work
SSiittee PPllaann CCoonncceepptt AAlltteerrnnaattiivveess Uses & Functions:
Kitchen Garden
• Welcome/ waiting area
o Seating & shade shelter
• Historic garden
• Interpretive signage
• Interactive Exhibits
The Lawn
• Formal lawn
• Flexible event space
o Picnic, games
o Wedding ceremony or
reception
Perimeter Trail
• Interpretive history displays
• Seating
The Patio
• Formal lawn
• Flexible event space
o Small crafts fair or farmers’
market
o Small live music program
o Wedding ceremony & reception
• Herb and flower gardens
• Seating & shade shelters
Pathway to Other Site Amenities
• Gift shop & Restrooms
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess || GGaarrddeenn Kitchen, herb, and flower gardens
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess || LLaawwnn
Flexible event space
Slide 5 Slide 6
Slide 7 Slide 8
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 70 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess || PPaattiioo Flexible event space
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess || PPeerriimmeetteerr ppaatthh Interpretive signage
Site Alternative Concept 1:
Geometric Plan
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess
Site Alternative Concept 1:
Geometric Plan
Slide 9 Slide 10
Slide 11 Slide 12
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 71 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
Site Alternative Concept 2:
Organic Plan
Site Alternative Concept 2:
Organic Plan
Event Layout
Farmer's Market Layout
Slide 13 Slide 14
Slide 15 Slide 16
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 72 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
BBuuiillddiinnggss AAlltteerrnnaattiivvee CCoonncceepptt 11:: Small Community Event Focus Uses & Functions:
Farmhouse
• Accessibility upgrades to first floor
• Flexible spaces for small indoor events, such as:
o Conferences
o Speaker series
o Small live music or arts programs
o Meetings
• Demonstration kitchen
o Cooking classes
o Event support
Garage
• Accessible restrooms
• Gift shop
o Refreshment
o Local goods
FFaarrmmhhoouussee –– OOvveerraallll EExxtteerriioorr CCoonncceepptt FFaarrmmhhoouussee –– OOvveerraallll EExxtteerriioorr CCoonncceepptt IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess
CCoonncceepptt 11 || FFaarrmmhhoouussee IInntteerriioorr Small Community Events
Slide 17 Slide 18
Slide 19 Slide 20
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 73 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess
CCoonncceepptt 11|| FFaarrmmhhoouussee IInntteerriioorr Demonstration Kitchen
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess
CCoonncceepptt 11 || GGaarraaggee
Gift Shop / Local Goods
BBuuiillddiinnggss CCoonncceepptt 11
Interior Floorplans
BBuuiillddiinnggss CCoonncceepptt 11AA
Interior Floorplans
Slide 21 Slide 22
Slide 23 Slide 24
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 74 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
BBuuiillddiinnggss AAlltteerrnnaattiivvee CCoonncceepptt 22: Education/Historic Interpretation Focus Uses & Functions:
Farmhouse:
• Accessibility upgrades to first floor
• Sunroom:
o Reception/ticketing
o Back-of-house staff office
• Living Room and Dining Room:
• Interpretive displays and artifacts about
Fiddyment Family/Roseville’s Pioneering and
Agricultural History
o Permanent displays at perimeters of rooms
o Moveable displays in middle of spaces to
allow for flexible use of spaces
• Kitchen
• Catering prep/event support
Garage
• Accessible restrooms
• Classroom space
• Outdoor covered picnic area
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess
CCoonncceepptt 22 || FFaarrmmhhoouussee IInntteerriioorr History Displays and Artifacts
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess
CCoonncceepptt 22 || FFaarrmmhhoouussee IInntteerriioorr History Displays and Artifacts
IInnssppiirraattiioonnaall IImmaaggeess
CCoonncceepptt 22 || GGaarraaggee
Indoor/Outdoor Classroom
Slide 25 Slide 26
Slide 27 Slide 28
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 75 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
BBuuiillddiinnggss CCoonncceepptt 22 || GGaarraaggee Indoor/Outdoor Classroom
BBuuiillddiinnggss CCoonncceepptt 22
Interior Floorplans
BBuuiillddiinnggss CCoonncceepptt 22AA
Interior Floorplans
FFaarrmmhhoouussee –– SSeeccoonndd FFlloooorr CCoonncceepptt 11AA && 22 Slide 29 Slide 30
Slide 31 Slide 32
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 76 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
FFaarrmmhhoouussee –– SSeeccoonndd FFlloooorr CCoonncceepptt 11AA && 22 PPootteennttiiaall PPhhaassiinngg && CCoosstt
WŚĂƐĞϭ–^ƚĂďŝůŝnjĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ;ĚĚƌĞƐƐŚĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ ĚĞƚĞƌŝŽƌĂƚŝŽŶͿ
WŚĂƐĞϮ
͘ ĂƐĞ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƐĐŽƉĞ;ůĞĂŶƵƉƐŝƚĞ͕ƌĞŵŽǀĞƐƚƵŵƉƐ͕ďĂƐŝĐƌĞŐƌĂĚŝŶŐ͕ŝŶƐƚĂůů ĨĞŶĐŝŶŐͬƐŝƚĞƐĞĐƵƌŝƚLJ ͕ďĂƐŝĐƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚͿƚŽƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĨŽƌĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌƐŝƚĞ ƉƵďůŝĐĂĐĐĞƐƐ
͘ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ>ŽƚWŚĂƐĞϭ
WŚĂƐĞϯ;WƵďůŝĐĂĐĐĞƐƐďĞŐŝŶƐͿ
͘ &ƌŽŶƚ>ĂǁŶĂŶĚ&ƌŽŶƚ
ŶƚƌLJWĂƚŚƐ
͘ WůĂŶƚWĞƌŝŵĞƚĞƌ^ŚĂĚĞdƌĞĞƐ
WŚĂƐĞϰ
͘ ,ŽƵƐĞĂƐĞĚĂƉƚŝǀĞZĞƵƐĞ^ĐŽƉĞ
͘ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů,ŽƵƐĞĚĂƉƚŝǀĞZĞƵƐĞ^ĐŽƉĞ
͘ ZĞĂƌWĂƚŝŽ
WŚĂƐĞϱ
͘ ZĞĂƌWĂƚŚƐ͕>ĂǁŶ͕ĂŶĚŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ'ĂƌĚĞŶƐ
WŚĂƐĞϲ
͘ 'ĂƌĂŐĞĂƐĞĚĂƉƚŝǀĞZĞƵƐĞ^ĐŽƉĞ
͘ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů'ĂƌĂŐĞĚĂƉƚŝǀĞZĞƵƐĞ^ĐŽƉĞ
Group Discussion
Next Steps
• Release Draft Visioning Plan Report
• 2-week comment period
• Release Final Visioning Plan
Additional comments or feedback?
Contact: [email protected]
Slide 33 Slide 34
Slide 35 Slide 36
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 77 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 78 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 79 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
Fiddyment Homestead Visioning
Roseville, CA
PAGE & TURNBULL 80 Appendix C: Public Meeting #2 Materials March 2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 8/19/2026
Item #: VII.16
File #: 0103 & 0103-13-03
Item ID: 2026-656
Title: Unscheduled Vacancy Appointment - Transportation Commission Contact: Katrina Six 916-774-5267 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends Council appoint one (1) individual to the Transportation Commission to a term expiring December 31, 2028, from the applications received from Jennifer Chapman, Lance Hibben, Ti Nguyen, and Esme Reyna.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
a. Appoint one (1) individual to the Transportation Commission to a term expiring December 31, 2028, from the applications received from Jennifer Chapman, Lance Hibben, Ti Nguyen, and Esme Reyna.
BACKGROUND
Appointments are due to be made as a result of an unscheduled vacancy. Jason Probst has vacated his seat on the Transportation Commission due to his appointment to the Planning Commission. Viideo interviews of the applicants were conducted by the City Clerk Department, and the City Attorney’s Office reviewed the Statements of Economic Interest (Form 700) for potential conflicts of interest. The applications, video interviews, and confidential attorney review are compiled and provided to the City Council for consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The appointment of members to boards or commissions meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA.
No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Katrina Six, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 8/5/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 8/5/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 8/6/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 8/7/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 8/10/2026