Sacramento City Council
September 17, 2024

City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

Third-Party Appeals of the Planning and Design Commission’s Determination of Exemption under California Environmental Quality Act for American River One (DR22-238) [Noticed on 09/06/2024]
File ID: 2024-01574
Location: APNs 001-0181-016-0000 & 001-0181-017-0000; 500 & 450 Bercut Drive, District 4, Represented by Mayor Steinberg
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion pass a Resolution determining the project is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21155.4 for American River One; thereby denying the third-party appeals.

Contact: Armando Lopez Jr., Assistant Architect, Associate AIA, CPD, LEED AP, (916) 808-8239, [email protected]; Matthew Sites, Senior Architect, AIA, (916) 808-7646, [email protected]; Tom Buford, Principal Planner, (916) 799-1531, [email protected]; Community Development Department Presenter: Tom Buford, Principal Planner, (916) 799-1531, [email protected], Community Development Department
Applicant: Julian Watt & Francesca Redetzke, LPA Design Studios, 431 I Street, #107, Sacramento, CA 95814
Appellants:
1) Save the America River Association; Matthew Chalmers, Birch Citadel PC, 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln CA 95648
2) Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 185; Rebecca Davis, Lozeau Drury LLP, 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150, Oakland, CA 94612 Property Owner: 500 Bercut, LLC and IM Investment Inc., PO Box 3001, Sacramento, CA 95812 Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.
2-Background
3-Resolution
4-CEQA Appeal Documents Project Plans, July 19, 2024
5-CEQA Appeal Documents Project Plans, June 18, 2024
6-Building Design Documents
7-SACOG Consistency Letter
8-EMAIL from SACOG, June 13, 2024
9-2020 MTP-SCS Existing and Planned Major Transit Stops 10-2020 MTP_SCS_Appendix A_Trans Project List (Partial)_Highlighted 11-SacRT DNA Greenline Route and Stations
12-Environmental Noise Assessment
13-Public Resources Code section 21155.4
14-Remy Moose Manley Response Letters
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: The proposed project involves construction of a mixed-use high-rise development on a

3.06-acre project site within the General Commercial (C-2-SPD) zone and River District Special Planning District (SPD).

On April 18, 2024, the Design Director approved the entitlements for the proposed project including a determination that the project is statutorily exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) section 21155.4. This exemption, added to the PRC chapter implementing sustainable communities strategies by Senate Bill 743, exempts from further CEQA review projects that are located in a transit-priority area, are consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy adopted by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), and are consistent with a specific plan for which an environmental impact report (EIR) was certified, here, the River District Specific Plan. The exemption permits additional environmental review only in limited circumstances detailed in PRC 21166. The text of PRC section 21155.4 is included as Attachment 13. Save the American River Association (SARA) filed a thirdparty appeal of the Design Director’s decision.

On June 13, 2024, the Planning and Design Commission considered SARA’s third-party appeal at a public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission made a determination that the project is exempt from CEQA and approved the site plan and design review and tree permit, thereby denying the third-party appeal, consistent with staff’s recommendation.

Pursuant to Sacramento City Code (SCC) 17.812.060.A.2, “a commission-level decision made on an appeal of a director-level decision may not be appealed.” As such the Planning and Design Commission’s decision on site plan and design review and tree permit are final and not subject to appeal. However, pursuant to PRC section 21151(c), when a CEQA determination is made by a nonelected body, an appeal of that determination is available to an elected body, in this case the City

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

Council.

SARA (see Attachment 4) and Laborers International Union of North America, Local 185 (LIUNA) (see Attachment 5) filed third-party appeals of the Planning and Design Commission’s CEQA determination. The SARA appeal alleges the proposed project does not satisfy the requirements of the PRC section 21155.4; LIUNA asserts that the emission of formaldehyde from composite wood finishing materials used in the interior of the proposed makes the exemption inapplicable and requires additional CEQA review.

If the City Council determines that the proposed project is eligible for the statutory exemption pursuant to PRC section 21155.4 (thereby denying the third-party appeals), the project may proceed to construction. If the City Council determines that the project has not satisfied the exemption criteria, the project would be required to either demonstrate it can satisfy the exemption criteria, or satisfy the provisions of CEQA via another manner such as the preparation of an initial study that leads to adoption of a mitigated negative declaration (MND) or certification of an environmental impact report (EIR).

City staff has reviewed both appeals and concludes that substantial evidence supports the City’s determination that the proposed project is exempt pursuant to PRC 21155.4. Furthermore, as set forth below, staff has determined that neither SARA nor LIUNA has presented substantial evidence to permit the City to require additional environmental review. Therefore, staff recommends denial of both appeals, on the grounds set forth below. A Notice of Exemption would be filed if the City Council denies the appeals. A Notice of Exemption affects the period in which a party may file a suit challenging the City’s CEQA determination.

Appeal Detail:

Each of the two appeals challenges the City’s reliance on PRC section 21155.4 to exempt the project from CEQA review.

The SARA appeal alleges the project is not within a transit priority area and is not consistent with the River District Specific Plan. The SARA appeal further alleges the City must require additional environmental review pursuant to PRC 21166, incorporated into PRC 21155.4, because the height and location of the proposed buildings may cause alleged aesthetic, noise, and biological impacts.

Staff’s analysis of these allegations is set forth in the Environmental Considerations section below.

The LIUNA appeal alleges that the City must require additional environmental review pursuant to PRC 21166, incorporated into 21155.4, because new information of substantial importance, not available at the time the River District Specific Plan was adopted (PRC 221166 (c)), allegedly demonstrates that the proposed project would have a significant effect on the environment.

Specifically, LIUNA asserts the proposed project’s use of composite wood finishing materials for the project’s interior spaces would emit formaldehyde at levels resulting in cancer risks exceeding the

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 10 in a million-cancer risk threshold for ambient air quality.

Staff’s recommendation to approve the project has not changed following review of the issues raised by the appellants. Staff recommends the City Council find that Public Resources Code section 21155.4 exempts the project from CEQA review and deny the appeals.

Public/Neighborhood Outreach and Comments: As part of the application review process, the proposal was routed to Preservation Sacramento, Civic Thread, Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates, Region Builders, The River District (PBID), and Save the American River Association (SARA).

Additionally, the site was posted with project information at the time of application submittal. SARA expressed concern, met with staff, appeared at hearings, and has appealed the Planning and Design Commission reliance on PRC section 21155.4. On behalf of I.M. Investment, LLC, Remy Moose Manley LLP has submitted response letters to SARA’s appeal letter (Attachment 14).

Policy Considerations: In public hearings, both the Design Director and Planning and Design Commission determined that the project was consistent with the 2040 General Plan, the River District Specific Plan, and the requirements of the Planning and Development Code. These determinations are not subject to review as part of these appeals, which are limited to issues associated with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Environmental Considerations: The American River One project (DR22-238) is located at 450 & 500 Bercut Drive within the City of Sacramento. The site is located within the River District Neighborhood at the southeastern corner of Interstate 5 and the American River. The project site was previously occupied by the Rusty Duck Restaurant, which was demolished on July 31, 2019.

The project site is located in the Sequoia Pacific Boulevard Area of the specific plan area. (Figure

3.6). The project is consistent with the vision for this area set forth in the specific plan:

The Specific Plan vision for the Sequoia Pacific Boulevard Area is one that takes advantage of the area’s proximity to a future Green Line light rail transit station located on Sequoia Pacific Boulevard.

The station is expected to be a gateway into the River District and Central City from the Sacramento International Airport. The station and its surroundings will be a defining feature of this Area, including a pedestrian plaza surrounded by a transit supportive mix of office and residential uses. The Area is also expected to include local and visitor-serving retail and commercial uses. Please note that Sequoia Pacific Boulevard will be changing its name to North 4th Street. (River District Specific Plan, page 25.) The Specific Plan makes reference to the American River Parkway Plan, which also anticipates development in the area.

American River Parkway Plan Policy 7.25 states: Between the confluence of the Sacramento and American rivers and the Capital City Freeway (Business-80) the Parkway context is the Sacramento

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.
downtown urban core for the Sacramento metropolitan region. Protection of the Parkway’s aesthetic values in this reach should be accomplished within the context of creating a vital urban area.

Development immediately adjacent to the Parkway shall respect the intent of the Parkway goals by reducing visual impacts through context sensitive site planning and building design. (American River Parkway Plan 2008, page 32, accessed 8/5/2024 at
https://regionalparks.saccounty.gov/Parks/Documents/Parks/ARPP06-092617_sm.pdf) As set forth below, the Environmental Planning Services Manager has determined that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the statutory exemption provided in Public Resources Code (PRC) section 21155.4. This exemption is part of the Sustainable Communities Strategy applicable to transit priority projects.

Background
The American River One project proposes a residential mixed-use development on a 3.06-acre site located within the River District Specific Plan (RDSP), the General Commercial (C-2-SPD) zone, and the River District Special Planning District (SPD). The project requires Site Plan and Design Review, and Tree Permit; as such, is a “project” as defined by CEQA. The approval of the Site Plan and Design Review and Tree Permit are final. The appeal only challenges to the City’s CEQA determination.

The project qualifies for the statutory CEQA exemption in PRC 21155.4 The Environmental Planning Services Manager has concluded that the proposed project qualifies for a CEQA statutory exemption pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) section 21155.4 and CEQA Guidelines section 15182 (b). Section 21155.4 was added to the PRC by Senate Bill (SB) 743 and provides an exemption from additional CEQA review for projects that are located in a transit-priority area, are consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy adopted by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), and consistent with a specific plan for which an environmental impact report (EIR) was certified. The statutory exemption applies according to its terms, which are discussed in detail below. The proposed project qualifies for the exemption.

PRC section 21155.4 is part of a comprehensive legislative approach to reducing vehicle miles traveled and supporting the state’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The legislature included the following that applies to PRC section 21155.4:

With the adoption of…the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 [SB 375], the Legislature signaled its commitment to encouraging land use and transportation planning decisions and investments that reduce vehicle miles traveled and contribute to the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions required in the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006… (SB 743, section 1(a)(1); Stats. 2013, Ch. 386.) SB 743 builds upon the reductions mandated by SB 375. Under SB 375 mandated reductions may

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.
be achieved through a variety of means, including “smart growth” planning to maximize building densities at locations served by public transit and to locate residences near needed services and shopping to reduce automobile dependency, shifting investment toward mass transit, changing transportation pricing, and encouraging car sharing, walking, and biking. SB 743 built upon this, making use of specific plans in PRC section 21155.4 in particular, for even better alignment with environmental goals that include reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and promotion of infill development.

A Sustainable Communities Strategy is a coordinated land use and transportation plan designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (Gov. Code, section 65080.) The four requirements of the PRC section 21155.4 are set forth below, together with SARA’s allegations related to the requirements

1. Requirement: The project must be a residential, employment center or mixed-use development project. (Gov. Code, section 21155.4 (a).)
Contention: SARA does not dispute that the project satisfies this requirement.

Response: The American River One Project proposes to construct a mixed-use development that would consist of 787 residential units and +4,114 square feet of retail space.

The 2040 General Plan defines mixed-use development as, “[p]roperties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with significant functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design. See also PRC section 21159.25(1). A “single site” may include contiguous properties.

Further, the American Planning Association defines mixed-use development is an alternative to single-use development. It places multiple uses within a site, such as street-level retail with residential units above (vertical mixed-use), or co-locates uses within a designated area, such as neighborhoods that offer residential, commercial, and civic spaces within walking distance (horizontal mixed use) (American Planning Association,
https://planning.org/blog/9227408/supporting-active-living-through-mixed-use-developments/).

The proposed project qualifies as a mixed-use development project, consistent with this requirement.

2. Requirement: The project must be located in a transit priority area, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 21099. (Public. Resources Code, section 21155.4 (a).) Contention: SARA alleges the proposed project is not within a transit priority area because

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

Contention: SARA alleges the proposed project is not within a transit priority area because SACOG has purportedly not adequately substantiated the conclusion that the light rail station within ½ mile of the project, qualifies as “planned.”
Response: Section 20199 defines transit priority area as including an area within ½ mile of an existing or planned major transit stop, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Plan or applicable regional transportation plan. Pursuant to PRC section 21064.3, a major transit stop is a site containing an existing rail transit station or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

SACOG has adopted the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS), the regional transportation plan for the Sacramento region. The MTP/SCS includes an extension of the light rail, the Green Line, from Township 9 to the Natomas Town Center, to be completed by 2030. The American River One project site is located one block away from (and within ½ mile of) from planned light rail stop at Richards Boulevard and North 3rd Street.The station is shown on SACOG’s GIS system mapping the transportation projects identified in the MTP/SCS, as confirmed by SACOG in a written concurrence letter and followup email (see Exhibits 6 through 10). The planning horizon for the MTP/SCS is 2040, therefore, the station is planned for completion within the planning horizon.

The proposed project is located in a transit priority area, consistent with this requirement.

SARA disputes this conclusion, asserting that the proposed station is not “planned” and that the Green Line must still undergo environmental review. The extension of the Green Line from Township 9 to the Natomas Town Center, as shown on the map in SACOG’s GIS mapping of the line, includes a planned stop at Richard’s Boulevard and North 3rd Street, to be completed within the planning horizon. The statutory criteria is therefore satisfied and SARA’s speculation does not constitute substantial evidence to the contrary.

Requirement: The project is undertaken to implement and is consistent with a specific plan for which an environmental impact report has been certified. (Pub. Resources Code, section 21154.4 (a)(2)) Contention: SARA contends the project is not consistent with the River District Specific Plan because a portion of the project is located on a parcel with a height limit of 35 feet.

Response: The proposed project’s land use is consistent with the River District Specific Plan.

The City prepared and certified an EIR for the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan EIR was certified, and the Specific Plan adopted, on February 15, 2011 (State Clearinghouse #2009062023).

The City determines a proposed project’s consistency with the Specific Plan. Consistency is

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

The City determines a proposed project’s consistency with the Specific Plan. Consistency is achieved if a project will further the overall objectives and policies of the Specific Plan and not obstruct their attainment, recognizing that a proposed project may be consistent with the overall objectives of the Specific plan, but not with each and every policy. In all instances, in making a determination of consistency, the City may use its discretion to balance and harmonize policies with other complementary or counter prevailing policies in a manner that best achieves the Specific Plan’s overall goals.

The policies and development standards established within the Specific Plan are implemented (see River District Specific Plan chapter 9) through the River District Special Planning District (SPD) (SCC chapter 17.436) and the River District Design Guidelines. Pursuant to SCC chapter 17.808, through site plan and design review, deviations from applicable development standards and guidelines may considered and granted in order to meet the purpose and intent of the applicable development standards and design guidelines.

The proposed height of the development on APN 001-0181-016-0000 is 152 feet (not counting mechanical screening and PV array on all towers which are in conformance with SCC §17.600.145.A), exceeding the 35 foot height shown in the River District Specific Plan.The Specific Plan allows for height variation in certain circumstances. The Specific Plan states under section 3.3 that development regulations including land use and zoning, density and height standards, building setbacks and parking regulations will be implemented under the River District Special Planning District codified in SCC chapter 17.436. In turn, SCC §17.436.040.B.1.a, governs height standards in the River District area. The section provides that design review or preservation review conducted at the director or commission level under chapter 17.808 may address and modify the required height to achieve the intent and purposes of the River District Urban Design Guidelines.

Through the site plan and design review process, the Planning and Development Commission found the design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are consistent with all applicable design guidelines and development standards, and the deviations for height, tower separation, and bulk control are consistent with the purpose and intent of the applicable design guidelines and development standards of the C-2-SPD zone, the River District SPD, and the architectural design standards within the River District Design Review guidelines. The increased height meets the purpose and intent of the development standards by serving as a transitioning height to adjacent towers, the height proposed correlates with adjacent parcels maximum height allowances, and the increased height takes advantage of riverfront views in accordance with the River District SPD.

The Planning and Design Commission further found that the towers’ decreased separation meets the purpose and intent of the River District guidelines by staggering the towers to mimic

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.
meets the purpose and intent of the River District guidelines by staggering the towers to mimic the curvilinear nature of the river to increase the view shed and creating full glass enclosures to increase visual permeability. The design of the project meets the purpose and intent of the goals and policies set forth in the bulk control standards as the development intensifies the density of the project yet steps down the towers to create a varied and defined skyline. Moreover, the design of the buildings and site seeks to balance urban uses with activities and design appropriate to the river setting. For example, vertical elements of the buildings terrace down toward the river and enable views through the development towards the other bank of the river. In addition to terracing down to the river, the building massing is broken into four main forms creating river facing, open-ended courtyards, minimizing the building frontage adjacent to the river. The project will encourage increased access and activity along the riverfront bike trail and appreciation of the ecological setting.

Finally, the Planning and Design Commission found the design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and the intent of future development planned within the River District SPD in that the proposed project will result in the construction of housing and commercial space that will serve to activate the west portion of the River District. The project meets the intent of the scale, massing, and setbacks regulations and is in keeping with the allowed height restrictions within the Sequoia Pacific Boulevard Area and the wider context of the River District neighborhood.

The project is consistent with the River District Design Guidelines. The proposal steps the height down towards the east in accordance with River District Design Guidelines for Bulk Controls - Tower Separation and Height Differentiation. Guideline 3 Height Differentiation explains that, … any new high rise should be at least 50’ shorter or taller than the two towers closest to it (measured in plan as a radius from the center of the diagonal). The taller towers (towers 1 and 2) are approx. 194 feet, which is a drop of 42 feet and meets the intended design criteria of the guideline. The River District Framework adds that building heights along the American River will transition from high-rise along Interstate 5 to mid-rise heights at North 5th Street (page 2-37). Moreover, the parcel across the street is zoned for 150 feet height maximum which will give the development context to the adjacent parcels and the surrounding neighborhood.

The River District Design Guidelines (page 4-1) notes that not all design principles will be met on any given project but can be mitigated with Alternative Design methods when the proposed design provides equal or greater amenities and benefits to compensate for areas of the project design not in compliance. The project design locates much of the tower massing to the south of the parcels to create public amenity spaces including an urban plaza on the ground floor and public open space on the podium level, and rooftop sky terrace on tower 1, 2, and 4.

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.
and public open space on the podium level, and rooftop sky terrace on tower 1, 2, and 4.

Additional public areas include a dog park on the northeast side of the property and a new public right of way access point to the Two Rivers Bike Trial running along the top of the American River levee. The inclusion of these public spaces nearly double what was required are intended to complement the buildings and provide needed relief from the hardscape and intensity of the denser land use patterns within the project site and the overall River District fabric.

The River District Specific Plan makes reference to the American River Parkway Plan. The project site is adjacent to, but not within the American River Parkway Plan area. The American River Parkway Plan was adopted in 2008, prior to the adoption of the Specific Plan in 2011; the American River Parkway Plan influenced the development of the Specific Planand the Specific Plan was found to be in conformance with the Parkway Plan. The Parkway Plan divides the plan area into distinct sub-units, intended to provide a comprehensive description of the individual areas. The area plans contain a detailed description of current and/or proposed future activities, location of natural and man-made features, facilities, opportunities, and constraints. The Planning and Design Commission found, and staff believes the design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed project are consistent with the American River Parkway Plan goals and policies.

The Parkway Plan acknowledges that buildings will be seen from the Parkway, stating, this area of the City of Sacramento provides a more urban context that is distinctly different than other areas of the Parkway. On the south side of the river is the downtown core of the Sacramento metropolitan region. Since views of downtown high-rise buildings and urban infrastructure already exist in this portion of the Parkway, the aesthetic values are different.

Here, views of the river and the Parkway, juxtaposed against high-rises in the distance, remind the visitor of the Parkway’s context-an open space greenbelt preserved in the urban core.

Views from the Parkway toward adjacent land uses in this area are expected to include some visible urban structures. (Parkway Plan, pg. 113)
The City has concluded that the project is consistent with the River District Specific Plan, a finding clearly within the City’s purview as it has unique competence to interpret its own Specific Plan and implementing policies. (Orange Citizens for Parks & Recreation v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.5th 141, 155.)

3. Requirement: The project is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in a sustainable communities strategy for which the State Air Resources Board (ARB) has accepted a metropolitan planning organization’s determination that the sustainable communities CEQA review strategy or the alternative planning strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) reduction targets.

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

Contention: SARA does not dispute this finding.

Response: The proposed project is consistent with the MTP/SCS adopted by SACOG.

SACOG certified a final EIR for the MTP/SCS (State Clearinghouse #20119049139). The ARB has accepted SACOG’s determination that the plan would achieve GHG reduction targets. AB 350 (See Government Code 65080 (d)(G)(3)(A) and (B)) extended the applicability of SACOG’s MTP/SCS. The written concurrence and follow-up email from SACOG regarding the City’s determination of consistency with the MTP/SCS is included as Exhibits 6 through 10.

The proposed project is consistent with the MTP/SCS, consistent with this requirement.

4. Requirement: Further environmental review shall be conducted only if any of the circumstances set forth in PRC 21166 have occurred.

Contention: The appeal asserts that project impacts for aesthetics, lighting, and biological resources are new information requiring further environmental review.

Response: PRC 21155.4 provides that “Further environmental review shall be conducted only if any of the events specified in Section 21166 have occurred.” PRC section 21166 and its implementing CEQA Guidelines section 15162, provide that once a lead agency has completed its environmental review of a project, as is the case here with the RDSP, CEQA, a lead agency may conduct further environmental review only if specific events have occurred.

Those events are:
“(a) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report.
(b) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the environmental impact report. (c) New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the environmental impact report was certified as complete, becomes available.” The limitations of PRC section 21166 and the CEQA Guidelines provisions in section 15162 are designed to balance CEQA's central purpose of promoting consideration of the environmental consequences of public decisions with interests in finality and efficiency and effectuate other legislative goals such as CEQA streamlining and statutory exemptions.

The River District Specific Plan was adopted as part of the planning process intended to encourage the “…evolution of the Plan area from a primarily light-industrial, low-intensity district, to a cohesive district with a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, public, and open space uses…The Specific Plan would serve to guide future decisions regarding land use, intensity of development, circulation, public spaces, urban design, and the necessary infrastructure improvements to support future development.” (Specific Plan EIR, page 3-1.)

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

As noted throughout the Specific Plan and Specific Plan EIR, development along the south side of the American River was contemplated, and the EIR included such plans in its analysis. (See, for example, Specific Plan EIR Figure 4-2, showing urban zoning for parcels along the American River.)
The American River One project presents no outstanding or unique site issues that would not have been considered in the Specific Plan EIR review.

Biological Resources. Height limits along the south side of the American River range from 35 feet to 200 feet. There is no substantial evidence that height limits affect biological resources, and the height limits were not adopted as mitigation for any such impacts. The presence of varying height limits along the river is indicative of planning concerns, subject to deviations where appropriate, and not CEQA issues. Impacts to biological resources resulting from development consistent with the specific plan were considered. Mitigation measures 5.2-2 (nesting birds), 5.2-3 (bats), 5.2-4 (elderberry longhorn beetle) addressed such impacts. The generalized claims of the appeal present no new issues of significance.

Aesthetics. The appeal asserts that significant effects would occur with regard to aesthetics and lighting. The City is prohibited from requiring analysis of alleged aesthetic impacts for the project pursuant to PRC 21099, subd. (d)(1). Nonetheless, the site plan and design review process, addresses these issues, which are inevitably involved in urban development, through design and location. These are not new issues that were not known or could not have been known at the time of the approval of the Specific Plan and certification of the associated EIR as complete as provided in PRC section 21166. The project site is identified as an appropriate location for urban development in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and the Planning and Development Code, and the City’s review process addresses relevant issues inherent with project development. The appeal points to no unusual factors that would support a finding of significant environmental effect.

The cumulative effects have been evaluated in the General Plan Master EIR and the specific plan EIR. The asserted project-specific effects for aesthetics, lighting, and biological resources do not constitute significant effects. Instead, they are inevitable features of urban development. The City design process ensures the project will be developed in a manner that respects the natural features of the site, as well as the biological resources in the area.

The site plan and design review process, followed here with this project, includes a detailed review of the project design, and minimizes the potential for significant effects. The discussion below highlights relevant aspects of the site plan and design review process.

The project was developed in accordance with the River District Design Guidelines for Façades which will have the most impact on a city’s urban and architectural character.

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

Façades which will have the most impact on a city’s urban and architectural character.

Categories in this section address a range of issues - ground uses, transparency, articulation, fenestration, sunshades, projections, & materials - that will ultimately give the building its look and feel.

Aesthetically, the layout of the towers is juxtaposed over the podium which breaks up the façade as you pass by the site or walk through it. The scale is in keeping with the allowed height restrictions within the zone and the wider context of the neighborhood. The design employs varying exterior sunshade treatments to the different elevations allowing the fenestrations to morph depending on the vantage point while utilizing balconies to create negative space and shadow play, further breaking down the massing of the towers.

To minimize adverse visual and lighting impacts on the aesthetic resources of the Parkway the development design has evolved to offset the towers towards the southern portion of the site allowing a podium level courtyard to exist and be better utilized facing the riverfront. The towers will range from approximately 33’-6” and 168’-0” away from the northern property line.

The towers will use a variety of screening devices - perforated metal paneling, sunshades, shading louvers, frosted glass - to mitigate light spillage onto the Parkway. Additional perforated metal panel screening with vegetation will be provided on the podium level garage structure to address light spillage onto the parkway and building.

Rooftops will provide additional landscaping to soften the verticality of the towers facing the Parkway. The color palate will consist of earth and gray tones with frosted glass paneling. The project has selected shielded fixtures with full cutoff optics that are dark sky compliant of zero up light to reduce light pollution with additional conditions for light levels to remain at zero-foot candles at the property line. Lastly, the project will be prohibited from adding signage on the Parkway side on the development. Staff believes the design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed project are consistent with the American River Parkway Plan goals and policies.

Noise. Pursuant to the 2040 General Plan Goal ERC-10, The City shall require noise mitigation for all development where the projected exterior noise levels exceed those shown in Table ERC-1, to the extent feasible (70 dBa). The development team consulted with I.M.

Investment, LLC to prepare an Environmental Noise Assessment report. Recommended mitigation measures to satisfy interior and exterior noise criteria can be found on page 13 (Attachment 12). Given that the project has addressed the required noise mitigation measures and provided an assessment report with recommended solutions, staff has no concerns that the proposed project will negatively impact the public health or welfare of individuals using the affected exterior open spaces of the development.

PRC 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a) do not allow new CEQA review

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

The LIUNA appeal asserts that new information of substantial importance requires supplemental CEQA review of the River District Specific Plan (RDSP) EIR. As stated above, PRC 21155.4 incorporates PRC 21166 which provides that once a lead agency has completed its environmental review of a project, as is the case here with the River District Specific Plan, a lead agency may conduct further environmental review only if specific events have occurred. One of those events is “…[n]ew information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration….” (CEQA Guidelines section 15162)
The River District Specific Plan EIR was certified, and the Specific Plan adopted, on February 15, 2011. There have been no substantial changes in the RDSP or in the circumstances in the specific plan area or with respect to the American River One Project that would affect the EIR analysis and conclusions. The appellant asserts that the new information cited in the appeal requires new CEQA review pursuant to PRC section 21166.

LIUNA asserts that proffered evidence of allegedly potentially significant indoor air quality impacts from formaldehyde in building materials constitutes new information of substantial importance which could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the previous EIR.

LIUNA and its retained Certified Industrial Hygienist and Professional Mechanical Engineer, Francis J. Offermann, fail to present evidence of new information of substantial importance which could not have been known in February of 2011, when the River District EIR was certified.

First, the appeal acknowledges that exposure to formaldehyde in building materials is not new information.

While the appeal is correct in stating that the substantial evidence standard applies, the result of applying the standard is to uphold the staff analysis and conclusions.

Formaldehyde has many applications, including use as a building material. Concerns regarding formaldehyde, and potential health effects, are long-standing. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) recounts some of this history on its web site:

CARB identified formaldehyde as a toxic air contaminant (TAC) in March 1992.

According to section 39655 of the California Health and Safety Code, a TAC is "an air pollutant which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health." Following its identification, CARB evaluated formaldehyde exposure in California and

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.
found that one of the major sources of formaldehyde exposure is from inhalation of formaldehyde emitted from composite wood products that contained formaldehyde resins. These emissions resulted from the release of unreacted formaldehyde from the resins in the composite wood products and from chemical degradation over time.

Resins used to bond wood materials typically contain formaldehyde. CARB, in its evaluation, proposed a regulation to reduce emissions of formaldehyde from hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium density fiberboard panels, and finished goods, such as furniture and cabinets fabricated with those materials.

On April 26, 2007, CARB approved an airborne toxic control measure to reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products that are sold, supplied, used, or manufactured for sale in California. (Source: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/composite-wood-products-program/about, accessed July 23, 2024) The issues surrounding formaldehyde in building materials have been known and were known at the time of the certification of the specific plan EIR. Once an EIR is finally approved, even a court cannot compel an agency to perform further environmental review for any known or knowable information about alleged impacts, even if omitted from analysis in the EIR.

The appeal agrees that CARB approved a regulation entitled Composite Wood Products Airborne Toxic Control Measure in 2007 - prior to the specific plan’s 2011 EIR - to regulate and reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products that are sold, supplied, used, or manufactured for sale in California. The appellant’s own argument refers to a study from 2009 on formaldehyde, demonstrating that the issue of formaldehyde in composite wood products does not constitute significant new information.

LIUNA’s citation to it proffered expert’s more recent studies do not constitute the type of new information contemplated by section 21166. The state was aware of formaldehyde use and formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, based on published reviews and studies, well before the specific plan EIR was circulated for public comment; the issue of formaldehyde in building materials and its potential effects had been discussed in literature for years before the specific plan EIR was certified.

Second, LIUNA has not provided any substantial evidence to support their claim that the project will be constructed with building materials with significant amounts of formaldehyde.

Third, Mr. Offermann’s analysis is not credible because LIUNA’s claim regarding a threshold of significance, and reliance on the Offerman report, is misplaced. LIUNA relies on a threshold that is not applicable. That threshold is designed to evaluate the increase in risk above ambient air quality conditions, i.e., outdoor air, not indoor. The appellant is challenging the interpretation and application of rules, not presenting new information of substantial importance. (See letter from Applicant dated

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

June 12, 2024.)
Fourth, LIUNA and Mr. Offermann demand the City to consider the environmental impact of the project on itself, rather than the environmental impact of the project on the environment, as CEQA requires. CEQA requires the examination of effects to “be limited to . . . adverse changes in physical conditions which exist within the area as defined in Section 21060.5.” (Public Resources Code, § 21151 (b).) The “environment” is, as defined in Public Resources Code § 21060.5, “the physical conditions which exist within the area which will be affected by a proposed project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historic or aesthetic significance.” (Emphasis added). ).

Health and safety law outside of CEQA - the highly specialized CARB and its regulations and the California Building Standards Code - uniformly and comprehensively address the issue in keeping with state policy and preempt local agency regulation of such consumer products.

Fifth, regulation of building materials falls squarely within health and safety laws outside of CEQA.

CARB, CARB regulations, and the California Building Standards Code uniformly and comprehensively address building materials, enforced at the building permit stage through CALGreen requirements. Local agencies are without jurisdiction to interfere with this comprehensive regulatory scheme.

The specific plan has been in effect without challenge since its adoption. There have been no major land use changes in the specific plan since its adoption, and no new major transportation infrastructure projects that would substantially change the anticipated circulation system. Continued development of Township 9, construction and operation of the state facility on Richards Boulevard (May Lee State Office Complex), construction and operation of the Twin Rivers residential development, and approval of the Grower’s District project on North 16th Street are each consistent with the character of development anticipated in the specific plan.

The proposed project does not request an amendment to the specific plan. As discussed in this staff report, the project complies with objective requirements of the specific plan and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the specific plan as well.

None of the circumstances set forth in PRC section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines section 15162 that would require new CEQA review have occurred.

The proposed project is, therefore, exempt from additional CEQA review.

Commission/Committee Action:

On April 18, 2024, the Design Director considered the project at a Director Hearing and approved the project entitlements, including the use of a CEQA exemption pursuant to PRC section 21155.4, consistent with staff’s recommendation. A third-party appeal of the Design Director Decision was filed on April 29, 2024 by SARA.

File ID: 2024-01574 9/17/2024 Public Hearing Item 15.

On June 13, 2024, the Planning and Design Commission considered the third-party appeal at a public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission made a determination that the project is exempt from CEQA and granted the project entitlements, thereby denying the third-party appeal, consistent with staff’s recommendation. Third-party appeals of the Commission’s decision were filed on June 18, 2024, by LIUNA, and on July 19, 2024 by SARA.

Rationale for Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council determine that the project satisfies the statutory criteria for the CEQA exemption pursuant to PRC section 21155.4, thereby denying the third-party appeals, based on the findings of fact listed in Attachment 3. Staff supports the use of this exemption because the project, as designed and as conditioned, is consistent with the provisions of PRC section 21155.4 in that the project is a mixed-use development within a transit priority area, is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR was certified, is consistent with an adopted MTP/SCS, and no circumstances set forth in PRC section 2116 or CEQA Guidelines section 15162 have occurred that require new CEQA review. Further, the project is required to satisfy California Building Code and CALGreen requirements related to formaldehyde limits which will be confirmed at the time of building permit submittal.

Financial Considerations: Not applicable.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): No goods or services are being purchased under this report.

BACKGROUND
This document serves as a summary of the American River One Site Plan and Design Review Entitlement and Tree Permit.

Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Background Information
The vacant project site is located within River District neighborhood situated at the southeast corner of the Interstate 5 and American River intersection. Commercial and residential uses are located to the south and east of the site, including a storage facility, apartments, restaurants, and service-oriented uses. To the west of the site is U.S.

Interstate 5 and the American River Parkway / Discovery Park to the north.

Figure 1 identifies the project vicinity and Figure 2 identifies the zoning of the project site and surrounding area. Figures 3 – 4 highlight the existing site conditions.

Figure 2: Zoning Map
Figure 3: Existing Conditions – 500 Bercut Drive
Figure 4: Existing Conditions – 450 Bercut Drive
This project proposes the construction of four residential towers (10-, 14-, and two at 18- stories) over a podium resulting in a total of 787 dwelling units with approximately 4,114 square feet of commercial space and associated site improvements on a 3.06-acre site within the General Commercial (C-2-SPD) zone and River District Special Planning District (SPD).

The project proposes three deviations from development standards:

1. River District SPD and guidelines establish a maximum height of 35 feet on Parcel

1. The project proposes a 152-foot building in this location.

2. The River District design guidelines establish a minimum separation of 80 feet between building towers. The project proposes a 50-foot separation between Building One and Two and a 19-foot separation between Building Two and Three.

3. The project exceeds River District guidelines for maximum average building floor plate, plan dimension, and diagonal dimension.

Lastly, the project proposes the removal of twenty-four Private Protected Trees. These trees are located onsite and are not within the Parkway.

Figure 5: American River One Rendering – View from Bercut Drive (south).

Table 1: Applicable Development Standards
Standard Reference Required Provided Deviation
Intensity General Plan
Parcel 1: FAR

0.4 – 4.0
Parcel 2: FAR

0.5 – 8.0
FAR 3.29
FAR 5.49
n/a
n/a
Height §17.436.010
Exhibit B
Parcel 1: 35’-0”
Parcel 2: 200’-0”
152’-0”
194’-8”
Y
N
Front Setback
§17. 216.730
0’-0” 24’-7” (Bercut) N
Interior
Setbacks 0’-0” 39’-2” (east)
6’-4” (south) N
Rear-Yard
Setback 0’-0” 27’-9” (highway) N
Levee Setback 20’-0” (less than
5 acres) 20’-0” N
Front Setback
(Tower)
River District
Private Realm
Guidelines
0’-0” 24’-9” N
Interior Setback
(Towers) 15’-0” 15’-0” (east)
15’-0” (south) N
Rear Setback
(Towers) 30’-0” 28’-4”
N (no adj.
towers
present)
Open Space §17.600.135 Min. 78,700 SF Approx.
143,300 SF N
Tower
Separation
River District
Private Realm
Guidelines
200’-0”
50’-0” between
Tower 1 & 2
19’-0” between
Tower 2 & 3
Y
Massing and
Building
Configuration
River District
Private Realm
Guidelines
Max average
tower floor plate:
7,500 SF
Tower 1: 14,090
Tower 2: 16,180
Tower 3: 6,820
Tower 4: 12,950
Y
Max plan
dimension: 90’-
0”
Tower 1: 190’-0”
Tower 2: 240’-0”
Tower 3: 100’-0”
Tower 4: 195’-0”
Max diagonal
dimension: 120’-
0”
Tower 1: 207’-0”
Tower 2: 250’-0”
Tower 3: 102’-0”
Tower 4: 204’-0”
Figure 6: South Elevation (View from Bercut Drive, looking north) Figure 7: North Elevation (View from the Parkway, looking south) Entitlement Review
The proposed project requests two entitlements, including Site Plan and Design Review, and a Tree Permit.

Site Plan and Design Review
The purpose and intent of the Site Plan and Design Review entitlement is to ensure the project proposal complies with the relevant development standards established by the underlying zone, overlay, PUD, or special planning district. In addition, the entitlement ensures the horizontal and vertical design of the development is compatible and complementary to surrounding development and consistent with applicable design guidelines.

The project is in the General Commercial (C-2-SPD) zone and River District Design Review Area. The proposed project complies with all applicable development standards of the C-2-SPD zone and River District SPD, as shown in Table 1, with exception of the deviations described within the Project Analysis section and shown in Table 1.

Justification for the deviations can be found under the Deviation Justification section.

This project is subject to the policies within the River District Specific Plan, the standards listed within the River District Special Planning District, and the River District Design Guidelines. The River District area is a gateway to the Central City and the Sacramento and American Rivers. These guiding documents encourage development that provides access to the Rivers, economically vibrant new developments, and the adaptive reuse of industrial buildings. The guidelines seek to achieve well-designed projects that provide quality amenities and materials, are compatible with surrounding developments, and that enhance the community’s overall value and appearance. These design elements should promote safe pedestrian and vehicular circulation and provide eyes on the street to foster a cohesive, safe, and interactive environment.

Building Intensity
Within the C-2-SPD zone and the River District SPD, allowable building intensity is established by the General Plan. Building intensity standards are established by floor area ratio (FAR) for nonresidential and mixed-use development. FAR is calculated by dividing the net building area by the total net lot area, excluding parking structures and open space.

Parcel 1 (500 Bercut Drive & -016) has a minimum density of 20 du/ac and a FAR range of 0.4 to 4.0. Parcel 2 (450 Bercut Drive & -017) has a minimum density of 24 du/ac and a FAR range of 0.5 to 8.0. Overall, the project density of 240 du/ac and FAR of 3.3 is consistent with the intensities established by the General Plan.

Access, Circulation, and Parking
The subject site is located off Bercut Drive and has approximately 215 feet of frontage.

The site has existing access via three driveways on Bercut Drive that will be redesigned to comply with current development standards and satisfy the proposed use of the site.

Vehicle Parking: The development is proposing 302 vehicle parking stalls across two podium levels with commercial and residential loading adjacent to elevator access.

Due to state and City regulations, no on-site vehicle parking is required. Pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 2097, a public agency is prohibited “from imposing any minimum automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project, as defined, that is located within 1/2 mile of public transit…” (Cal.Gov.Code section 65863.2(a). The development will be located 0.2-miles from the Richards Blvd. & Bercut Drive Bus Stop and will be approx. 0.33-miles from the planned Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Light Rail Station. Moreover, the 2040 General Plan does not require new or existing development to provide off-street vehicle parking spaces pursuant to LUP-4.14.

Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access to the development will be via the plaza fronting Bercut Drive. Access into the residential towers will be via lobbies on the ground floors of towers 2, 3, and 4. Apart from the plaza, the public will have access to the third level podium via the grand exterior staircase between Towers 2 and 3. The commercial spaces will be located on the ground floor and the third podium level.

Bicycle Parking: This project meets bicycle parking requirements for mixed-use developments in the Urban Parking District. Long-term bicycle storage is located within the parking garage on the second level podium near elevators and will conform to the Bike Rack Design and Placement Design Standards, while short-term bicycle parking is located along the vehicular entry to the south and within the first-floor garage podium level. See table 2 below for additional parking information.

Table 2: Traditional Parking Requirements - Bicycle
Use
Required Provided
Long- Deviation
Term1
ShortTerm2LongTermShortTerm
Multi-Unit Dwelling – 787
Units 394 79 494 79 N
Retail – 4,055 square feet 2 2 2 2 N
1 17.608.030.C: Multi-Unit Dwelling – 1 space per 2 dwelling units or 2 spaces, whichever is greater. Commercial Services – a 1 space per 10,000 gross square feet of building or 2 spaces, whichever is greater.
2 17.608.030.C: Multi-Unit Dwelling – 1 space per 10 dwelling units or 2 spaces, whichever is greater. Commercial Services – 1 space per 2,000 gross square feet of building or 2 spaces, whichever is greater.

Open Space and Resident Amenities
Section 17.600.135 of the City Code requires a combination of private and common open spaces at a ratio of 100 square feet of open space per dwelling unit for multi-unit dwellings. At 787 units, this project requires 78,700 square feet of open space. Common open spaces are required to provide landscaping, decorative paving, seating, and other features. Private open space includes features like balconies or patio space accessible from private residences.

This project complies with the code requirement for open space strictly through common open space, providing approximately 143,300 square feet of space. Open space amenities available to residents include: a public plaza; common and private open space for residents only (sky roof terraces and private balconies); dog park area; and trail head entrance.

Pursuant to River District Design Review Framework Guideline, “… in redevelopment or infill areas of the City where smaller tracts of land make it difficult to dedicate park land, parks may be smaller or may be developed in a more intense fashion fitting to the surroundings. In this kind of urban setting, recreation facilities may also include indoor gyms, urban plazas or rooftop gardens.” The development is proposing several amenity spaces which will include indoor gyms, an urban plaza on the ground floor and public open space on the podium level, and rooftop sky terrance on tower 1, 2, and 4. Additional public areas include a dog park on the northeast side of the property and a new public right of way access point to the Two Rivers Bike Trial running along the top of the American River levee.

In accordance with the River District Private Realm Guidelines for Small Public Open Space, small public spaces will be a key component of the open space network in the River District. The development’s proposed public plaza and third level podium level will provide needed open space for surrounding residences (Track 281 Apartments, 321 Bercut Drive, located southeast of the project site), offices, and commercial buildings, and can serve as places to gather and recreate for persons living, working or visiting nearby.

The inclusion of publicly accessible dog park and Two Rivers Bike Trail access are intended to complement the buildings and provide needed relief from the hardscape and intensity of the denser land use patterns within the project site and the overall River District fabric. These intimate small public places help create a more livable city.

Recycle, Trash and Green Waste Collection
Recycling, trash, and green waste will be collected via enclosed trash rooms on the ground floor of the parking structure with refuse chutes provided on each floor for resident access. Three chutes are provided within each room for trash, recyclables, and organics.

Waste is diverted from the trash chute into a frontload bin equipped with tow hitches with a maximum capacity of three cubic yards to allow bins to be towed. A tow caddy provided by and operated by a facilities management team employed by the property management company will relocate trash, recycling, and organics bins to a staging room once the bins are filled. The staging room is located adjacent to an area which will be marked as nonaccessible to vehicles with appropriate “no parking zone” signage along the route which the garbage truck operated by a commercial garbage hauler will travel. The commercial garbage hauler will pull out bins from the enclosure and empty them into the garbage truck. See sheet G2.04 for additional information.

Architectural Analysis
The project was developed in accordance with the River District Design Guidelines for Façades which will have the most impact on a city’s urban and architectural character.

Categories in this section address a range of issues – ground uses, transparency, articulation, fenestration, sunshades, projections, & materials – that will ultimately give the building its look and feel.
 Façades - Ground Level Uses: In order to have lively mixed-use district retail areas, commercial and community uses are encouraged at sidewalk level, ensuring the maximum transparency and permeability of the street facade.

The development proposes an approx. 8,000 square foot public plaza that will serve as a welcoming gathering spot for residents and visitors. The plaza will contain concrete and wood seat walls throughout with a triangular public art installation in the center of the area and an approx. 1,500 square foot commercial space to further draw people into the development.
 Façades – Transparency: Where retail, commercial, community or other active uses occur, it is imperative that they are visible from the street to both pedestrians and motorists. The facade thus needs to have a high level of transparency in order for these uses to get the amount of visibility required for their healthy business operation.

These facades should also have a high degree of permeability.

The project proposes to utilize a glass curtain wall system throughout the commercial and residential areas. Depending on the elevation, horizontal louvers or vertical sunshades will be employed to mitigate sun exposure on the residential towers. The garage structure will receive perforated metal panel system around the perimeter. The project takes a step further proposing frosted glass panels on the balconies and guardrails.
 Façades - Articulation of Street-Wall: While the new blocks in the River District are not as uniform in size, the importance of scale and articulation of the street wall gives the urban blocks their predominant rhythm and variety and creates a fine-grained pattern to the urban fabric. In order to avoid block-long, unbroken facades, unarticulated façade planes should be limited limit to an in order to create visual variety and interest.

Given the nature of the four tower elements and each elevation treated with its own unique sun shading mechanism, the development will be a dynamic monument at the entry gate into the Central City. The layout of the towers is juxtaposed over the podium which breaks up the façade as you pass by the site or walk through it. The scale is in keeping with the allowed height restrictions within the zone and the wider context of the neighborhood with an area zoned for a 150-foot height maximum across the street (northeast of the project site).
 Façades - Fenestration: Window and Facade Systems and Patterns: Fenestration is the arrangement, proportioning and design of windows. Windows should be used as an element which helps to articulate the character of a facade and designed to reveal the thickness/depth of the facade wall.

As discussed within Transparency above, the project will employ a glass curtain wall system for its exterior façade. The development will prominently showcase the horizontal floor plates throughout with the vertical sunshades, Aluminum Composite Material panels, and precast concrete panels anchoring the structure to the ground.

Employing the varying exterior sunshade treatments to the different elevations allows the fenestrations to morph depending on the vantage point.  Façades - Canopies, Awnings, Sunshades: Of the many elements of facade design, canopies, awnings and sunshades have a combined role of providing shade for both human activity and for the building itself. Taken as a group, these elements play a significant role in the appearance and function of a building.

Incorporating the vertical sunshades on the west and east façades with horizontal louvers on the south elevations will keep the direct sunlight from entering, or hitting the facade of the building, thereby keeping it cool and ensuring more comfortable interior environments and as well as reducing mechanical use which is beneficial on a sustainable aspect.
 Façades - Projecting Elements and Encroachments: Façade projections are a desirable feature and are part of California’s architectural vocabulary. They add visual variety and interest while enhancing the connection between public & private realms.

The development will utilize balconies on the west elevations of towers 1, 2, and 4 adding articulation and visual interest to the building. Additional inset balconies can be found on the other elevations that provide negative space and shadow play, further breaking down the massing of the towers.
 Façade - Materials: Buildings shall be constructed with exterior materials of the highest quality. Exterior materials, textures and colors shall be selected to further articulate the building design. Buildings in the River District can be more eclectic in the use of materials.

The development will consist of a glass curtain wall system, aluminum composite panels, glass fiber reinforced concrete panels, concrete, and metal architectural elements (perforated metal paneling, sunshades, shading louvers, photovoltaic panel array, etc.). The proposal will be a unique edition to the Sacramento skyline in its stance adjacent to the waterfront but also in its incorporation of environmental devices to combat solar heat gains.
 Façade - Lighting: Building facades shall have illumination appropriate to their use and location, with light fixture design selected to best complement the architectural design of the project.

The development team has made every effort to select shielded fixtures with full cutoff optics that are dark sky compliant of zero uplight to reduce light pollution. Additionally, fixtures are directed away from surrounding environments to help protect the sensitive natural habitat areas along the riverfront. Fixtures will be specified with 3000K CCT and 80CRI. All fixture types are dimmable and will be zoned separately. Fixtures will be programmed to be photocell on/time clock off and provided with any necessary motion sensors to comply with Title 24 regulations. Moreover, lighting restrictions pertaining to fixture locations, light orientation, and glare/hazardous interference with adjacent uses will be placed on the development under Planning, Public Works, and Sacramento Police conditions. Lastly, the development will be required to provide a photometric plan to confirm lighting proposals and to ensure that there is zero-foot candles at the property line.

Figure 8: Maximum Allowed Height Map
Deviation Justification
Building Heights: Pursuant to the River District Special Planning District, Maximum Allowed Height (Measured from Existing Grade) (Exhibit B): The maximum height of a development is 35 feet.

The proposed height of the development on APN 001-0181-016-0000 is 152 feet (not counting mechanical screening and PV array on all towers which are in conformance with SCC §17.600.145.A). Though the increase in height is substantial over the allowed maximum, the proposal steps the height down towards the east in accordance with the purpose and intent of the River District Design Guidelines for Bulk Controls - Tower Separation and Height Differentiation. Guideline 3 Height Differentiation explains that, “… any new high rise should be at least 50’ shorter or taller than the two towers closest to it (measured in plan as a radius from the center of the diagonal).” The taller towers (buildings 1 and 2) are approx. 194 feet, which is a drop of 42 feet and meets the intended design criteria of the guideline. The River District Framework adds that building “heights along the American River will transition from high-rise along Interstate 5 to mid-rise heights at North 5th Street (page 2-37).” Moreover, the parcel across the street is zoned for 150 feet height maximum with additional parcels to the east along the river front set at 120 feet maximum (see Exhibit B) which will give the development context to the adjacent parcels and the surrounding neighborhood.

Lastly, the River District Special Planning District Plan notes on page 25 that, “… buildings along the Sacramento riverfront are expected to take advantage of the view of the river through increased height and convenient riverfront access.” The development takes this statement as a recommendation to increase height to utilize the asset that is the American River to the north.

Tower Separation: Pursuant to River District Design Guidelines Section 1.c - Residential High Rise, guideline 1.B.II.b: Side: minimum 80 feet between adjacent tower sides. The same regulation is expressed again under Section 3.c - Bulk Controls - Tower Separation and Height Differentiation, guideline 1. Tower Spacing & Separation: A minimum separation of 80 feet in all directions is required between residential towers (200 feet along the riverfront). This applies to existing and new residential towers, including where multiple towers are part of the same design scheme / development and applies to the street right-of-way in the River District which may be less than 80 feet in width.

The separation between towers 1 & 2 is approx. 50 feet, whereas the separation between tower 2 & 3 is approximately 19 feet. Towers 3 and 4 are connected via glass enclosed walkways throughout each floor on tower 3. Due to the site constraints of the parcel and the desired density goals, the proposal will not be able to meet these standards. Where it lacks separation between buildings it uses the benefit of being a corner parcel to stagger the towers to show the curvilinear nature of the river. In addition, the development team redesigned the towers to increase the view shed between them by eliminating multiple connecting bridges and converting the remaining to full glass enclosures for visual permeability.

Bulk Controls: Pursuant to Section 1.c - Residential High Rise, guideline B: Bulk controls: Above the street-wall height of 60 feet, bulk controls apply, related to tower heights as follows (refer also to Chapter 4, Part D.3 - Bulk Controls for massing diagrams): I. Up to 240 feet height:

1. Maximum average tower floor plate: 7,500 square feet

2. Maximum plan dimension: 90 feet

3. Maximum diagonal dimension: 120 feet
Projects that do not adhere to the Bulk Control criteria set forth in this document should ensure, at a minimum, that tower designs take into consideration shadow casting, heat island effect, solar orientation, wind tunnel effects, prevailing winds, as well as view sheds as stated within the Alternative Designs and Flexibility Regarding Bulk Controls (page 4-31) within the River District Design Guidelines. The development provided shadow casting, wind tunnel, and prevailing winds exhibits along with a sightlines diagram.

The design of the project meets the intent of the goals and policies set forth within the Bulk Controls section of the River District Design Guidelines which states, “…bulk controls shall be implemented to foster a distinctive and metropolitan city skyline with buildings of varied shapes, sizes, and articulated tops.” Staff supports the deviations as it intensifies the density of the project yet stepping down the towers (14 and 10 stories) to create a varied and defined skyline as you approach the downtown area from the north down Interstate 5.

Table 3: Bulk Controls
Standards Tower 1 Tower 2 Tower 3 Tower 4 Deviations
Maximum average tower
floor plate: 7,500 sq ft
14,090
sf
16,180
sf 6,820 sf 12,950 sf Y
Maximum plan dimension:
90 feet 190 feet 240 feet 100 feet 195 feet Y
Maximum diagonal
dimension: 120 feet 207 feet 250 feet 120 feet 204 feet Y Tree Permit
Pursuant to Sacramento City Code (SCC) 12.56, the removal of private protected trees requires a tree removal permit. This project proposes to remove twenty-four (24) private protected trees:
#4901 cottonwood 71-inch DSH #4912 redwood 30-inch DSH
#4902 live oak 30-inch DSH #4913 live oak 20-inch DSH
#4904 London plane 25-inch DSH #4914 redwood 25-inch DSH #4906 live oak 21-inch DSH #4916 live oak 17-inch DSH
#4908 live oak 25-inch DSH #4917 live oak 20-inch DSH
#4909 live oak 23-inch DSH #4918 live oak 13-inch DSH
#4910 CA sycamore 27-inch DSH #4919 CA sycamore 40-inch DSH #4911 CA sycamore 26-inch DSH #4920 CA sycamore 39-inch DSH #4921 CA sycamore 28-inch DSH #4925 CA sycamore 33-inch DSH #4922 live oak 30-inch DSH #4926 live oak 24-inch DSH
#4923 live oak 32-inch DSH #4927 live oak 22-inch DSH
#4924 CA sycamore 51-inch DSH #4928 live oak 38-inch DSH The trees have an aggregate diameter at standard height (DHS) of 710 inches, as identified according to the Arborist report completed by Sierra Nevada Arborists, dated September 9, 2019, and related exhibits.

The trees are proposed for removal because they conflict with building footprints and associated necessary grading and required infrastructure. None of the trees proposed for removal are located within the American River Parkway Plan area.

The applicant has provided a replacement plan that is consistent with the replacement requirements described in the City tree ordinance that includes the planting and irrigation of (10) – 36-inch box trees, the equivalent of 30 inches DSH, in the form of landscape and City street trees, and payment of in-lieu fees totaling $221,000.00 to be deposited to the Tree Planting and Replacement Fund.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01574
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
Date Adopted

ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING
AMERICAN RIVER ONE (DR22-238)
500 & 450 Bercut Drive (001-0181-016-0000 & 001-0181-017-0000) BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO:

BACKGROUND
A. On December 22, 2022, LPA Design Studios, submitted a development application for American River One (DR22-238). The application included a request for a Site Plan and Design Review and a Tree Permit (Project).

B. On April 18, 2024, the Design Director conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given pursuant to SCC chapter 17.812; received and considered evidence concerning the Project; and upon its conclusion approved with conditions the Project.

C. Pursuant to SCC sections 12.56.070.B, 17.808.140, and 17.812.060, the decisions of the Design Director may be appealed to the Planning and Design Commission.

D. On April 29, 2024, Save the America River Association submitted a third-party appeal of the Design Director decisions relating to the Project.

E. On June 13, 2024, the Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given pursuant to SCC chapter 17.812; received and considered evidence concerning the Project, and upon its conclusion approved with conditions the Project, thereby denying the third-party appeal.

F. Pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21151(c), CEQA provides that “[i]f a nonelected decision-making body of a lead agency certifies an environmental impact report, approves a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration, or determines that a project is not subject to this division, that certification, approval, or determination may be appealed to the agency’s elected decisionmaking body, if any.” Thus, Planning and Design Commission’s decision to exempt the Project under CEQA section 21155.4 may be appealed to City Council.

G. On June 18, 2024, Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 185 submitted a third-party appeal of the Planning and Design Commission decision relating to the CEQA determination.

H. On July 19, 2024, Birch Citadel P.C, submitted a third-party appeal of the Planning and Design Commission decision relating to the CEQA determination.

I. On September 17, 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given pursuant to SCC chapter 17.812, and received and considered evidence concerning the Project.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Project, the City Council approves the Project entitlements, thereby denying the thirdparty appeal, based on the findings of fact and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below.

Section 2. The City Council approves the Project entitlements based on the following Findings of Fact:

A. Environmental Determination: Based on the determination and recommendation of the City’s Environmental Planning Services Manager and the oral and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the project, the Planning and Design Commission finds that:

1. On February 15, 2011, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §21000 et seq. (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §15000 et seq.), and the City of Sacramento environmental guidelines, the City Council approved an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopted Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and approved the River District Specific Plan (RDSP).

2. The American River One Project (DR22-238) Project is a residential development project within the meaning of PRC section 21155.4(a).

3. The project is located in a transit priority area within the meaning of PRC section 21155.4(a)(1).

4. The project is consistent with the RDSP as required by PRC section 21155.4(a)(2).

5. The project is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area as set forth in the Sacramento Area Organization of Governments (SACOG) Metropolitan Transit Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, which has been accepted by the California Air Resources Board as applicable achieving greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.

6. There have been no substantial changes proposed in the specific plan that would require major changes in the River District Specific Plan EIR, or changes in the circumstances under which the EIR was prepared or new information that was not known and could not have been known, has become available.

7. The City Council finds that the appeals do not present substantial evidence that the project fails to satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code section 21155.4. The City Council further finds that the purported evidence presented by appellants’ preferred expert in support of the assertion that supplemental review is required pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 is not significant new information, is not credible, and does not support a requirement for the City to conduct further environmental review.

8. Upon approval of the project, the Planning Director shall file or cause to be filed a Notice of Exemption with the Sacramento County Clerk and, if the project requires a discretionary approval from any state agency, with the State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to section 21152(a) of the Public Resources Code and the State EIR Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.

9. Pursuant to Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which Staff based its decision, including the previously certified EIR, are located in and may be obtained from, the Community Development Department at 300 Richards Boulevard, Third Floor, Sacramento, California 95811. The Planning Director is the custodian of records for all matters before the Design Director. (

SACRAMENTO
300 Richards Blvd., 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
Community Development Help Line: (916) 264-5011
[email protected]
Appeal Decision
City of Sacramento Planning and Design Commission
Date: 7/19/2024
To the Planning Director:

I do hereby make application to appeal the decision of the City Planning and Design Commission on 6/13/2024 , for project number P DR22-238
(hearing date) - --------
X --- - Granted by the City Planning Commission
---- Denied by the City Planning Commission
Property Location: 450 & 500 Bercut Drive, Sacramento, CA 95811 Grounds For Appeal: (explain in detail, you may attach additional pages) See attached letter
Appellant: Matthew Chalmers, Birch Citadel P.C, on behalf of SARA Daytime Phone: (916 ) 272-141 O (please print)
Address: 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648
Appellant's Signature: ~~-----======
Please note that once this application is submitted to the City of Sacramento, your information may be subject to public record .

However, please note that the City will not sell your data or information for any purposes.

THIS BOX FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Filing Fee Received: Applicant ($11 , 115) Or Third Party ($1,045) Received By: Date: 7/19/2024
Distribute Copies to: Planning Director
Principal Planner Project Planner (original)
Submit the Appeal Form by email to [email protected]. OR to 300 Richards Blvd, 3,ct Floor, Community Development Department Public Counter Tuesday through Thursday, between 9AM to 4 PM . Fees must be paid within the 10-day appeal period. An appeal may not be accepted unless it is timely filed and applicable fees paid.

CDD-0066 Revised 7-19-2024 Page 1 of 1
PAID 7-19-24
By Pamela Morgan at 1:58 pm, Jul 19, 2024
1 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 July 19, 2024
To: Sacramento City Council
Re: American River One Project (DR22-238)
Dear Sacramento City Councilmembers,
We hope this letter finds you well. We are writing on behalf of our clients, Save the American River Association, Inc. (“SARA”) to appeal the City’s decision to approve the American River One Project (DR22-238) (“Project”) as exempt from CEQA review pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21155.4.
1 This appeal solely addresses our CEQA concerns and does not waive any other concerns.

We remain concerned that the project’s approval is both inconsistent with Public Resources Code section 21155.4, and therefore that the City did not proceed in the manner required by law, and that the decision was not supported by substantial evidence.

In addition, at the June 13, 2024 evening hearing before the Sacramento Planning and Design Commission, two documents alleged to provide an adequate evidentiary basis for this decision appear to have been introduced into evidence and the administrative record mere minutes prior to the Commission’s decision, without opportunity for either examination or rebuttal. These two documents appear to have been integral to the Commission’s decision to approve the project.

However, there was no opportunity to discuss critical evidentiary flaws and contextual omissions that prevent these documents from satisfying the requirements of section 21155.4 at this hearing.

We would like to take the opportunity to walk you through these issues in greater detail.

I. Project Timeline
A. Initial approval. Project applicant LPA, Inc. submitted the initial Project application in late 2022.

On April 19, 2024, City of Sacramento Design Director Bruce Monighan approved the Project as exempt from CEQA review. On April 30, 2024, the City filed its first Notice of Exemption with respect to this decision, citing Public Resources Code section 21155.4 and Government Code section 65457 as the bases for the exemption. Our client appealed this decision. 1 CEQA Guidelines section 15182, which effectively serve as regulations implementing CEQA’s statutory provisions, restates Public Resources Code section 21155.4 for purposes of this analysis, and for brevity is not referenced further. For clarity, all further citations refer to the Public Resources Code unless otherwise noted.

BIRCH CITADEL
2 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 B. First administrative appeal. On June 13, 2024, the appeal was heard before the City Planning and Design Commission, which also approved the Project as exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21155.4. The next day, the City filed its second Notice of Exemption, citing only Public Resources Code section 21155.4 as the sole basis for the exemption.

In addition, at the June 13, 2024 evening hearing before the Sacramento Planning and Design Commission, two documents alleged to provide an adequate evidentiary basis for this decision appear to have been introduced into evidence and the administrative record mere minutes prior to the Commission’s decision, without opportunity for either examination or rebuttal.

These two documents appear to have been integral to the Commission’s decision to approve the project. However, there are critical issues and contextual omissions that prevent these documents from satisfying the requirements of section 21155.4. We will discuss these flaws in turn below.

C. Second administrative appeal. On June 18, 2024, Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 185, (“LIUNA”) initiated an elective second administrative appeal to the Sacramento City Council, also on the grounds that the section 21155.4 exemption does not apply, except on an unrelated (but no less concerning) factual basis. We would like to take the opportunity presented by this appeal to share our concerns with you applicable to this appeal, i.e., involving CEQA.2
II. Elements of the Section 21155.4 Statutory Exemption Section 21155.4 states that a residential, employment center, or mixed-use development project is exempt from CEQA if and only if three criteria are all met:

1. The project must be within a transit priority area as explicitly defined by section 21099(a).

2. The project must be undertaken to implement, and be consistent with, a specific plan for which an EIR has been previously certified.

3. The project must be consistent with the general use designation and other policies specified in a sustainable communities strategy.

In addition, further environmental review is required if any of the triggering events in section 21166 have occurred. These include:
a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the underlying EIR.
b. Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions to the underlying EIR. c. New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the underlying EIR’s certification, becomes available.
2 Nothing in this appeal should be construed as waiving concerns raised in litigation, or elsewhere, concerning the further inconsistency of the Project with the Urban American River Parkway Preservation Act (UARPPA), California Public Resources Code 5840 et seq.
3 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 Therefore, to properly qualify for this statutory exemption, six elements must be satisfied: all three elements of section 21155.4 must be met, and none of the three triggering events under section 21166 must occur.

We would like to raise to your attention that two of the elements of section 21155.4 have not been satisfied, and that triggering events under section 21166 have occurred. We are concerned that the City’s approval of this project does this reflect these facts, and therefore, that approval of the American River One project has not proceeded in the manner required by law and is not based on substantial evidence.

1. The Project is not within a transit priority area as defined by section 21099(a).

A. Legal standard. Section 21099(a)(7) specifically defines a “transit priority area” as “an area within one-half mile of a major transit stop that is existing or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program or applicable regional transportation plan.” (Emphasis added.) A “major transit stop” is a statutory term defined by section 21064.3 as “a site containing any of the following: (a) An existing rail or bus rapid transit station. (b) A ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service. (c) The intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.” Therefore, to qualify as being within a transit priority area, as defined by statute, the Project must be within one-half mile of (1) an existing or planned (2) specific stop which (3) meets the requirements of section 21064.3.

B. Existing stops. There is no indication that the Project is within one-half mile of an existing stop that meets the requirements of section 21064.3.3 This was confirmed by City staff at the June 13, 2024 hearing and does not appear to be in dispute.4 Therefore, to qualify as being within a transit priority area, the Project must be located within one-half mile of a (1) planned (2) stop that (3) meets the requirements of section 21064.3.

C. Planned stops. The initial approval of the Project on April 19, 2024 relies on a January 18, 2022 letter from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (“SACOG”) letter, which states:
“The project is located within a Transit Priority Area, pursuant to PRC § 21155.4. … The Project site is located one block away from a planned light rail stop at Richards and N 3rd street that is 3 We do not contest the fact that one or more stops exist outside the statutorily defined one-half mile transit priority area boundaries that “almost” qualify.
4 Remarks by Tom Buford, Manager, Environmental Planning Services at the City of Sacramento (8:42pm). Playback of the hearing is available at https://sacramento.granicus.com/player/clip/5954?view_id=34&redirect=true 4 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 included in MTP/SCS. The Project’s proximity to this stop demonstrates that the project site is within a TPA.”
The January 18, 2022 SACOG letter and associated “worksheets” provide no other detail to substantiate this claim, and further explicitly disclaim responsibility for determining CEQA compliance and state that it is the responsibility of the lead agency to make such determinations.

The associated worksheets indicate by checkboxes that the Project is located with a “center and corridor community or an established community” citing to Appendix D in the 2020 MTP/SCS.

The April 19, 2024 Director Report including staff’s recommendation relied upon at the April 19, 2024 approval indicates: “The project site is located in the area identified as a transit priority area.

More specifically, the American River One project site is located one block away from a planned light rail stop at Richards Boulevard and North 3rd Street that is included in the MTP/SCS.” However, no such stop is indicated in the 2020 MTP/SCS. After an exhaustive search, the only plausible reference seems to be the discussion of the Green Line on page 66 of Appendix A of the 2020 MTP/SCS, discussed further below.

On June 13, 2024, SACOG submitted a follow-up email addressed to City staff referencing the January 18, 2022 letter, which indicated that the Project “is located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) pursuant to PRC § 21155.4” stating “SACOG reviewed the project description and SCS consistency analysis compared to the MTP/SCS assumptions for the project area in order to make our determination.” In this letter, which was also added to the record mere hours prior to the hearing, SACOG indicated:
“In our adopted 2020 MTP/SCS, which has a planning horizon of 2040, we do include the Green Line Extension from Township 9 to Natomas Town Center as a project planned for completion by 2030.”
The June 13, 2024 SACOG letter also indicates that while “not required to be in the MTIP to qualify as a planned major transit stop, the Green Line is also currently programmed in the MTIP for purposes of environmental review (no construction funds yet)” indicating that the project still needs to undergo environmental review, including “the effort will entail the preparation of a Draft EIS (and EIR), its circulation for public review and comment, addressing the comments and will culminate with a Final EIS (and EIR)” and concluding various other technical and planning tasks are yet to be completed. This email also included a broken link to SACOG’s online GIS portal.5 At the June 13, 2024 hearing, Applicant introduced two documents into the record shortly before the vote was cast, arguing as above that there is a planned stop at Richards and North 3rd. 5 https://portal.sacog.org/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9df1c17713e546feb905c5d3493a3ea3 As of the date of this filing, with the assistance of County staff, we were able to access this link, which leads to a map claiming to show all existing and planned major transit stops in the 2020 MTP/SCS. Unlike Appendix A to the 2020 MTP/SCS, this map does show a rail stop labeled “2040 Planned Major Transit Stop” near the Project site. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear. The map also disclaims: “This map is for illustrative purposes only and was not drafted with the express approval of all local governments in the SACOG region. Local governments are the lead agencies responsible for making the final determination on AB 2097’s application.” Regardless, the map does not appear to have been included in the administrative record of either decision. 5 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 The first document provided by Applicant is a copy of page 66 of the 2020 MTP/SCS highlighting “REG17943” (“Programmed”) and “SAC25235” (“Planned”), emphasizing the highlighted word “Planned” as evidence that the requirements of section 21155.4 had been met. The project is described as a $390,000,000 extension of the Green Line from Township 9 to the North Natomas Town Center, with “completion timing” marked as “2026-2030.” However, this document suffers from several critical flaws that render it an insufficient basis upon which to rest the entirety of the Project’s statutory exemption under section 21155.4. There are no locations of specific stations, planned or otherwise, to be found in either entry, much less any mention of a planned station at Richards and North 3rd as claimed by the City and Applicant. Rather, the Green Line is simply identified as being slated for extension. The description states only:
“Extend rail from Township 9 to North Natomas Town Center.” This document therefore fails to identify any (1) planned (2) stops that (3) meet the requirements of section 21064.3, which are the elements required to show that the exemption to CEQA applies to the Project.

Applicant also produced a map generally illustrating the current Green Line (as of June 13, 2024) and the proposed airport extension. In the bottom right corner of the map, an unmarked blue dot is circled next to a yellow area marked “Township 9 Station.” There is no reference to Richards and North 3rd except possibly the unlabeled, circled blue dot, where blue dots on the map are marked “Proposed Stations.” Given the illustrative nature of the map, it is unclear whether the depiction is to scale or more than generally geographically accurate. An arrow points to a yellow square labeled “existing stations” on the map legend, labeled “Township 9 Station.” As with page 66 of the 2020 MTP/SCS, this map suffers from several critical flaws that render it an inadequate basis upon which to rest the Project’s statutory exemption under section 21155.4.

First, the map, originally presented on Sacramento Regional Transit’s website,6 must be understood in the context of the article that it was obtained from.7 The map is labeled as the “Green Line Project Map” with a prominent asterisk on the Sacramento Regional Transit’s website. Immediately underneath the headline, a disclaimer reads: “*This map subject to change based on the environmental review process.” The article from which the map was obtained—authored and apparently not changed since May 5, 2022—provides additional context:
“SacRT is currently revising draft environmental documents for the project, but final environmental impact documents must be completed, and further progress is dependent on securing a matching local funding source that will allow SacRT to enter into the federal capital investment grant program for the remaining funding. With the passage of the historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and potential new local funding, SacRT has an opportunity to advance this project and improve local mobility throughout the county.

Final design and alignment for the Green Line in the Natomas area has not been identified. A formal timeline for construction has not yet been updated.” (Emphasis added.) Second, there is no direct reference to Richards and North 3rd on the map. In context we presume that the circled blue dot refers to this stop. Our concern, however, is that this does not characterize 6 The map appears to have been taken from an article on the Green Line extension from the Sacramento Regional Transit’s website available online at https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 7 The map is also available on the Green Line’s Wikipedia page, which does not feature the note regarding subject to change.
6 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 the stop as planned, projected, or slated to be built, but rather merely a “Proposed Station” by the map’s legend. In the context of the article from which the map was obtained, it is unclear that this illustration of a “proposed station” accompanying an over two-year-old article indicating that the Green Line Extension was subject to change rises to the level of substantial evidence of a (1) planned (2) stop that (3) meet the requirements of section 21064.3, which are the elements required to show that the exemption to CEQA invoked by the City applies to the Project.

2. The Project is not consistent with the River District Specific Plan.

As discussed above, the second element of section 21155.4 requires “the project must be undertaken to implement, and be consistent with, a specific plan for which an EIR has been previously certified.”
As our client’s February 20 and February 21, 2024 letters explain in detail, the River District Specific Plan considered and analyzed the environmental impacts from proposed development in a transition space between Sacramento’s urban center, including I-5, and the American River Parkway. The River District Specific Plan’s contemplation of a 35-foot height restriction in certain areas near the Parkway, as pictured below in the City’s June 13, 2024 report, is central to protecting core biological and aesthetic resources in key buffer areas (referred to as “ribbon of parks at the river’s edge”). Although much of the project exists within the 200-foot height restricted area, the expansion of the Project into this height-restricted space was not contemplated by the RDSP EIR. 7 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 In the June 13, 2024 report,8 the City recognizes that “the increase in height is substantial over the allowed maximum” but that nonetheless it should be permitted because “the proposal steps the height down towards the east in accordance with the purpose and intent of the River District Design Guidelines for Bulk Controls – Tower Separation and Height Differentiation” and because, among other reasons, across the street, 150 feet is permissible.

The question at hand is not the policy wisdom of a particular decision, but whether, pursuant to section 21155.4, the Project is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been previously certified. Here, the City admits in its June 13, 2024 report that “the increase in height is substantial over the allowed maximum” and discusses policy justifications.

The June 13, 2024 report also states on page 124 that “the River District Special Planning District Plan notes on page 24 that, ‘…buildings along the Sacramento riverfront are expected to take advantage of the view of the river through increased height and convenient riverfront access.’” The report then contends: “The development takes this statement as a recommendation to increase height to utilize the asset that is the American River to the north.” Our survey of the River District Specific Plan indicates that this language does not concern the area where the Project is proposed, but rather an entirely different context on the opposite side of I-5:
“Jibboom Street Area. This subarea is located between Interstate-5 and the Sacramento River and along Jibboom Street from the Railyards Specific Plan development to the American River. The area is currently developed with a number of hotels, highway-oriented commercial businesses, and the historic former PG&E power plant (currently proposed for a learning center). Robert T. Matsui Waterfront Park is located at the southern edge of the district. The area has a direct connection to Old Sacramento from the Sacramento River Parkway, via an off-street bike trail along the Sacramento River.

The Specific Plan vision for this area is as a destination for tourists and other visitors, with a concentration of hotels, restaurants, and entertainment venues. The area is expected to retain its service commercial uses, catering to the traveling public. Buildings along the Sacramento riverfront are expected to take advantage of the view of the river through increased height and convenient riverfront access.” (Emphasis added.) In the Jibboom Street Area, depicted above, 150- and 250-feet buildings are not only permitted but consistent with the River District Specific Plan. The issue at hand here is not the presence of tall buildings, but the presence of tall buildings in a height-restricted location where existing environmental review explicitly contemplates that height restriction will be respected.

In other words, our concern is not, as was raised at the June 13, 2024 hearing, a flat objection to urban development. Our concern is ensuring that our state’s environmental laws are obeyed both in substance and in process, and that where an exemption to CEQA is invoked for a project that will almost certainly have a wide array of significant adverse environmental effects, the requirements of that exemption are all met before it is granted. Here, that exemption requires that the project be consistent with a previously conducted EIR in order to qualify for that exemption. It seems clear here that the 35-foot height restriction was an important part of the carefully crafted compromise and balance between development and environmental protection. We merely ask for a reasonable opportunity to assess the potential for environmental impacts consistent with decades of CEQA. 8 File ID 2024-01194, City of Sacramento Planning and Design Commission Report on Public Hearing Item 8. 8 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410

3. One or more triggering events identified in section 21166 have occurred.

A. Legal standard. As discussed above, subsection (b) of Section 21155.4 provides an important exception to the exemption from CEQA in the form of three specific triggering events specified by section 21166. Should any of these triggering events occur, further environmental review is required; in such a situation, the exemption from CEQA review does not apply as substantial changes or new information not previously evaluated in the underlying EIR must be assessed.

Section 21166 requires additional environmental review if any of the following occur:
• Substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the underlying EIR.
• Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions to the underlying EIR. • New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the underlying EIR’s certification, becomes available.

B. Triggering events. For the same reasons discussed above, and as identified in our client’s February 20 and February 21, 2024 letters, all three triggering events have occurred. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following points previously raised in the course of this administrative proceeding:
• Exceeding 35-foot height restriction near the American River Parkway. As discussed and depicted above, the 35-foot height restricted area is intended to serve as a buffer between environmentally sensitive Parkway areas and Sacramento’s urban core. • Aesthetics, noise, and visual resources. As our client notes in their February 21, 2024 letter: “The American River One project would have two structures with a height of 194 feet, one with a height of 109 feet, and one with a height of 152 feet… [a]ll would be located close to the levee…. The developer is proposing trees, landscaping, and other measures to screen the buildings. But buildings this tall and so close to the Parkway cannot be effectively screened nor can there be limits on noise generated on the balconies and decks that line most floors of the buildings. There definitely would be light and visual intrusions on the Parkway.”
• Lighting. At the June 13, 2024 hearing, Applicant stated that there was no way to control the impact of light coming from within residential units in the virtually all-glass high-rise towers. This would likely qualify as an unmitigable significant adverse environmental impact given the inability to restrict light sources from residents emanating from within individual residential units.
• Biological impacts. As indicated by our client’s letters, we anticipate a range of significant adverse environmental impacts to result from the project, including but not limited to impacts on light-sensitive riparian species (including impacts to sleep, hunting, foraging, and other patterns) in the parkway to potential greater incidents of bird strikes and other collisions with the tall glass structures.
9 9 We recognize that other tall primarily glass high-rise structures exist in the nearby downtown. However, the American River Parkway is a key location along north-south migratory bird routes (such as the Pacific Flyway), 9 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 This is not an exhaustive list of the potential significant adverse environmental effects potentially created by the Project. Indeed, one of our core concerns is that there has been inadequate opportunity, without conducting an Initial Study, to even assess the quantity or extent of these impacts (or to see if any mitigation is, such as through a mitigated negative declaration process.) The River District Specific Plan did not analyze or contemplate such an imposing and high-impact project in the 35-foot height restricted area. Rather, the River District Specific Plan appears to achieve a delicate balance between important environmental and developmental goals predicated upon the use of such height restricted areas as a buffer to the Parkway.

Therefore, the Project (1) proposes substantial changes to the project originally assessed in the River District Specific Plan that would require major revisions to the underlying EIR; (2) constitute substantial changes in the circumstances under which the Project is being undertaken compared to that which was assessed in the underlying EIR; and (3) constitute new information which was not, and could not have been known, during the lead up and approval of the underlying EIR well over a decade ago. Consequently, the exception to the section 21155.4 exemption has been met, and further environmental review is required.

III. Conclusion
This appeal is not about seeking to stop development. This appeal is not about any one individual’s backyard. This appeal is about Sacramento’s backyard, ensuring that the American River Parkway, an environmental crown jewel of the state, is treated fairly under the law. This appeal is about ensuring that the legislature’s intent in requiring process under CEQA is followed.

Our clients do not seek to halt progress, or development, or to halt the desperately needed efforts to cure our state’s housing shortage. All we ask is that in considering the approval of the Project, the same impartial consideration be given to our state’s environmental laws as any other project, and that the process required by CEQA, including the requirements of this exemption, be respected.

Thank you for your time and consideration on this important issue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the number or email address below.

Sincerely,
Matthew F. Chalmers, J.D.

CEO and Founder, Birch Citadel, P.C.

Office: (916)-272-1546
[email protected]
including for various endangered species as well as birds subject to international law including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., which generally prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
10 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410

ATTACHMENTS

BIRCH CITADEL
11 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 ElvertaRd
Saaamento ro f International o.Z1
\ Airport ! ~ ~ i <irffllbrwf ; ~ ~l
~ -
111111111
W Elkhorn Blvd
•
Current Green line
Proposed Airport Extension
Existing Stations
Proposed Stations ~ • I "''111111111111111111111 11111111111 ,,,,,., . ,,,,.11,, ,,~ North
Natomas
Del Paso Rd
~ ' s
\ '/;1
Am!l!Qrl ~ ,,,. ,,,,,,. ,11,.,❖/,,
!Ulloml\(Mlff _.... •
"O
~,,__ ~ ci ~ ~
lltdffllopmtcc ~ ~ N Market Blvd
ktl
ArMa Blvd
San Juan Rd
w El Camino Ave
! I ~ ,0
""111.<:J
!ht
l'lfflltNdit
,,,.
~ ~
~
•
IJID ~ ; South
=O!IIIS t ~ Natomas ( (~ff= 2
&,Ub/MY :: ,_
•
~ SlontClfflt
~\
l
m
American River Bridge Crossing - River Distrid 1~.,~ • ~ Sudoli Railyards/
Saaamento Valley Station
::nltlJ),r:...;; Ri(Mlds Blvd
Downtown
Saaamento
12 http://www.birchcitadel.com | 103 Cardini Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648 | (916)-272-1410 Green Line Project Map*
·This map is subject to change based on t 1e environmental revie •J process.

Click to expand
Saaamento • 1nte1NtiONI
Airport ~
-~ ~ !
f'r l
lhtrtlN
W!IU>:mUwll
tll1 111111 1111 . I 1111"1.tJ/tll. llUtit,
~ North y
"'" Natomu ~
"• ll
, ... iw
'T(11{ GI
11 "' " Prop0ird ·r t ut ·on
ExMing Sr.ions
e Proposed S1abims
Oowntcrwn
Sacnuwento
2020 MTP /SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned, County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost Year of Expenditure Completion Programmed or {2018 dollars) Cost for planned Timing
Project projects
Development Only)
This project will first deploy an Enhanced Employee Protection Warning System (EEPWS) that will alert both the train operator of an upcoming work zone and the workers in that zone of the approaching train. This system consists of two elements. The first element is vehicle mounted equipment; the Sacra mento second component is a wearable warning device used by track workers. It will Regional Transit F- Transit O&M also develop and demonstrate a state of the art dispatcher work crew/lone REG18042 Progra mmed SAC District (General) Enhanced Employee Protection Warning System worker software system. $ 1,103,400 2020-2025 Sacra mento General maintenance of facilities throughtou the district, including LR Regional Transit E- Transit Capita l ma intena nce faci liites, Bus mainten ance facilities, administrative buidlings, SAC25239 Planned SAC District (Major) General Facilities Maintenance and Improvements Customer Service building, etc. $ 3,625,000 $ 5,939,985 2036-2040 Modifications and enhancements to the Gold Line to enable more frequent Sacra mento service and/or limited stop express service between Folsom and downtown Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Sacramento including 10 Expansioin LRVs, Side Track, Signal and Crossing SAC2Sl52 Planned SAC District (Major) Gold Line Frequency and Service Enhancements Upgrades, LR faci lity and yard expansions. $ 194,800,000 $ 319,202,483 2036-2040 This project will redefine a Minimum Operable Segment (MOS) 2 and a MOS 3.

REG17935 includes the Final Design and Construction for the project (excluding MOS-1).This phase of the Green Line to the Airport (ONA) Light Rail Project will consist of two discreet, yet connected efforts. For the segment of the Green Line near and adjacent to the Sacramento lntermoda! Transfer Center (SITF), the effort will entail the preparation of Draft EIS (and EIR), its circulation for public review and comment, addressing the comments and will culminate with a Final EIS {and EIR). The segment of the project adjacent to t he S!TF will be coordinated with on-going Sacramento Streetcar planning, environmental review, and design development. For the remainder of the 13- mile corridor, the effort will entail the preparation of a Draft EIS (and E1R) only and its circulation for public review and comments. An MOS wil l also be identified for this segment. The effort will also evaluate low-floor LRT vehicles and their integration into the RT system, evaluate LRT vehicle maintenance locations for the Green line, evaluate downtown Sacramento rail/traffic effects of the proposed service, prepare the necessary technical information and for a New Starts evaluation under MAP-21, and involve the community and stakeholders in an outreach program for both efforts. Advan ced Sacra mento conceptual engineering and preliminary engineering in key areas with potential Regional Transit E- Transit Capital for environmental impacts that may require mitigation strategies for the EIS REG17943 Programmed SAC District (Major) Green Line (DNA) Light Rail - Planning will be completed. $ 14,310,336 2020-2025 Sacra me nto
Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Green Line: MOS2 Township 9 to North Natomas Town Center SAC2S235 Planned SAC District (Major) (CON) Extend rail from Township 9 to North Natomas Town Center $ 390,000,000 $ 499,232,972 2026-2030 Sacra mento
Project Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Green Line: MOS3 North Natomas Town Center to Airport SAC25236 Development Only SAC District (Major) (CO N) Extend rail from North Natomas Town Center to Airport $ 700,000,000 Post-2040 Sacramento
Regional Transit E- Transit Capital
SAC25148 Planned SAC District (Vehicles) Hi-Bus Expansion Vehicles Hi Bus Veh icles for five BRT lines and 20 Enhanced Bus lines $ 168,877,000 $ 276,724,629 2036-2040 Sacramento
Regional Transit E- Transit Capital
SAC2Sl51 Planned SAC District (Major) Hi-Bus Infrastructure Hi Bus Infrastructure for five BRT lines and 20 Enhanced Bus lines $ 368,317,000 $ 603,530,291 2036-2040 Sacramento On the Gold line, between Butterfield and Mather/Mills stations, at Horn Rd .

Regional Transit E- Transit Capital and Old Winery Pl, construct new light rail station. (Emission Benefits in REG18024 Programmed SAC District (Major) Horn Light Rail Station kg/day: 0.27 ROG, 0.26 NOx, 0.15 PMlO) $ 4,600,000 2020-2025

6/13/24, 4:02 PM home-image-greenline.jpg (701 x872)
Del Paso Rd
al
w Elkho1n Blvd
North
Natomas
S,mJuanRd
W El Camino Ave
American River•Bridge Crossin.
https://www.sacrt.com/wp-content/uploads/home-image-greenline.jpg - Current Green line
111111 111 Pro_po.sedAirport Extensjo11
Existing Statiom
• Pro:po:sed Stations
N Markel B-1vd
•
South
Natomas
l
CD
;;; ""
,E
0 z
~ S'IOM(f~ "?: i\p,lltmtnts
er District l0'1,1t!ft~ g. St~I»«!
~ . ~
:;-~tic.afl'...\\:.;.''11--•
Downtown
Sacramento
1/1

S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N A L T R A N S I T D I S T R I C T Home (https://www.sacrt.com) / Sacramento Regional Transit District (https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-theairport/) / Green Line to the Airport Select Language ▼
Green Line to the Airport
May 5, 2022 · General (https://www.sacrt.com/category/general/) SacRT’s Green Line to the Airport project will extend light rail approximately 13 miles north from downtown Sacramento to the River District, the Natomas communities and the Sacramento International Airport, as outlined in SACOG’s MTP/SCS (http://sacog.org/mtpscs/).

The project will alleviate roadway congestion and provide a safe, convenient, and affordable alternative for traveling between Downtown Sacramento, South and North Natomas, and the Sacramento International Airport. The project will also provide a direct connection to the region’s major intermodal facility at the Sacramento Valley Station.
7/18/24, 11:42 PM Green Line to the Airport – Sacramento Regional Transit District https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 1/7
I I
SacRT is currently revising draft environmental documents for the project, but final environmental impact documents must be completed, and further progress is dependent on securing a matching local funding source that will allow SacRT to enter into the federal capital investment grant program for the remaining funding. With the passage of the historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and potential new local funding, SacRT has an opportunity to advance this project and improve local mobility throughout the county.

Final design and alignment for the Green Line in the Natomas area has not been identified. A formal timeline for construction has not yet been updated.

The Green Line to the River District light rail train currently operates Monday through Friday between the 13th Street light rail station and the 7th & Richards/Township 9 light rail station. Learn more about the Green Line to the River District (https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-the-river-district/).

Green Line Project Map*
*This map is subject to change based on the environmental review process.

Click to expand
7/18/24, 11:42 PM Green Line to the Airport – Sacramento Regional Transit District https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 2/7
(https://www.sacrt.com/wp-content/uploads/home-image-greenline.jpg) Project Background
Learn more about the history of the Green Line to the Airport project (https://www.sacrt.com/history-of-thegreen-line-to-the-airport-project/).

Project Benefits
Find out what the Green to the the Airport project will bring to the community. Click here to read the projects benefits (https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport-project-benefits/). 7/18/24, 11:42 PM Green Line to the Airport – Sacramento Regional Transit District https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 3/7
Sacramento ! International i Airport ~
,~ i ~. ~ 0. _.......,.,,.,
Elver.a Rd
111111111
IV Elkhorn 81vd
-
•
Current G1een line
Proposed Airport Extension
Existing Slations
Proposed itations ~ "'1111111111111111111111 . u11111111111,,,,11 rn11111", . North ~ Natomas
Del Paso Rd
\ ~
i,
~,,, ,, Amtrican~er(dlegt 11111 . :\ :1.-~ N¥omtsCenttr --+- ______ ! : £ ~':r"' ~ ~ N Market 81vd
Arena Btvd
San Juan Rd
w El Camino A.vt
! f ~ "' ?1/ :>
n.
,,.
~
-~
~ \
illl § ~ South
s.."'""""" f M Natomas CO!f1f!1l!C'<IC"'t«: i &Libl"J ~ !
%_ Slont(fffl
~~"""'
j
ls
z
American River Bridge Crossing ~ River District ,,.~,9 • ~ su ...

Railyards/
Sacramento Valley Station
Richatd< 81vd
Downtown
Sacramento
Background Studies and Reports
City of Sacramento 2035 General Plan (https://www.cityofsacramento.org/CommunityDevelopment/Planning/Long-Range/General-Plan), 2015 American River Crossing Alternatives Study Final Report (https://www.sacrt.com/wpcontent/uploads/GL_American-River-Crossings-Study-Final-Report_DS.pdf), 2013 Metropolitan Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) (http://sacog.org/mtpscs/), 2012
Transitional Analysis (https://www.sacrt.com/wp-content/uploads/Transitional-AnalysisReport.pdf), 2010 Green Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Issue Paper & Board Resolution (https://www.sacrt.com/wp-content/uploads/Transitional-Analysis-Report.pdf), 2010 Final Environmental Impact Report for the Downtown-Natomas-Airport (DNA) Light Rail Transit Phase 1 Project (https://www.sacrt.com/wp-content/uploads/Green-LineCOMPILED-FEIR.pdf), 2009* Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (https://www.sacrt.com/wpcontent/uploads/Final-Environmental-Impact-Report.pdf), 2008 Alternatives Analysis (https://www.sacrt.com/wp-content/uploads/AlternativesAnalysis_Full-Document.pdf), 2003 *The Green Line to the Airport project used to be called the Downtown-Natomas-Airport (DNA) project.

Contact Us
If you are interested in improvements to public transportation in the Natomas communities, or if you have questions about how public transportation might affect your home, neighborhood or business, SacRT encourages your input and participation in the Green Line to the Airport project. SacRT wants to encourage local communities and stakeholders to become and stay involved and informed at all stages of planning and implementation. Email the project team at [email protected]. (mailto:[email protected])
(/#facebook) (/#twitter) (/#pinterest)
7/18/24, 11:42 PM Green Line to the Airport – Sacramento Regional Transit District https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 4/7
Mission
Moving you where you want
to go, when you want to go.
    
 B
Information on this website
can be provided to you in a
variety of accessible formats
in addition to the translation
feature, such as diskette/CD,
audio tape, braille, or large
print. If you need any written
information provided to you
in one of these accessible
formats, please contact the
Accessible Services
Department at (916) 321-
2877, Option 2 then Option

1. Get in Touch
Sacramento Regional
Transit District
1102 Q Street, Suite 3000
Sacramento, CA 95811
Customer Service
916-321-BUSS (2877)
Monday through Friday:
6:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Saturday, Sunday
and Holidays
7 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Sign Up for Email
Updates
(https://lp.constant
contactpages.com/s
u/Puglvjy/SacRTUp
dates)
Online Feedback Form
(https://www.sacrt.com/Cus
tomerfeedback)
Site Map
(https://sacrt.com/sitemap.
html)
Search
(https://www.sacrt.com/sea
rch)
Inside SacRT
About SacRT
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Aboutrt/)
Contact Us
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Contactus/)
SacRT Board Of Directors
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
About-Rt/Rtboard/)
SacRT Board Agenda
(Https://Iportal.Sacrt.Com
/WebApps/SRTDBM/Meeti
ngDocs/SacRT%20Curren
t%20Board%20Agenda.Pd
f)
SacRT Board Meeting
Information And
Documents
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Sacrt-Board-Of-DirectorsMeetings/)
SacRT Executive
Management Team
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
About-Rt/RTEMT/)
Financial Documents
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
About-Rt/RTFinDocs/)
Retirement Board Agenda
(Https://Iportal.Sacrt.Com
/WebApps/SRTDBM/Retire
mentDocs/Combined%20
Agenda.Pdf)
Retirement Board
Documents
7/18/24, 11:42 PM Green Line to the Airport – Sacramento Regional Transit District https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 5/7
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Business
Opportunities
Human Resources
(Https://Iportal.Sacrt.Com
/Iapps/Srtdbm/Retiremen
tboard.Asp)
Fact Sheets
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
About-Rt/RTFactSheet/)
Media Center
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
News/)
Social Media Policy
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
WpContent/Uploads/SacRT_
Social_Media_Policy_9-
14-2020.Pdf)
Advertising
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Procurement/Advertising/
)
Procurement
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Fares/Procurement/)
Real Estate
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Realestate/)
Employment Center
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Career/)
Employee Portal
(Https://Www.Sacrt.Com/
Empportal/)
7/18/24, 11:42 PM Green Line to the Airport – Sacramento Regional Transit District https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 6/7
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
© 2022 Sacramento Regional Transit District. All rights reserved. 7/18/24, 11:42 PM Green Line to the Airport – Sacramento Regional Transit District https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/ 7/7
Appendix A: Draft 2020 MTP/SCS
Transportation Project List

HEADERS DESCRIPTION
ID Sactrak ID of project
Status (Planned, Programmed or Project
Development Only)
2020 MTP and 2019 MTIP status. Planned and Programmed
projects are considered financially constrained and expected to be constructed by 2040. Project Development Only projects are financially unconstrained and expected to be constructed after 2040.

County Location of project, not lead agency or sponsor
Lead Agency Project lead agency or sponsor
Budget Category There are seven budget categories used to summarize total investments in the plan. These categories do not denote air quality conformity exempt or non-exempt status.

A- Bike & Ped
B- Road & Highway Capacity
C- Maintenance & Rehabilitation
D- Programs & Planning (that do not lead to construction) E - Transit Capital
F - Transit Operations and Maintenance
G- System Management, Operations, and ITS
Category E - Transit Capital includes the following subcategories:

Major, Minor and Vehicles.

Category F - Transit O&M includes the following subcategories: BRT & Express, Bus, Demand Response, General, Light Rail, and Rail.

Title Project Title
Description Project Scope of Work
Total Project Cost (2018 dollars) Total Cost in 2018 dollars Year of Expenditure Cost for planned
projects
Year of Expenditure dollars calculated for Planned projects only Completion Timing 5-year range when project is expected to be open to traffic.

Note on Status: Programmed projects include projects that have funding commitments listed in the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). Planned projects include those projects with no funding committment listed in the four years covered by the the MTIP (2019-2022) and are generally longer lead projects with funding coming later in the planning period. Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2040. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint requirements for forecasting revenues, the construction phase is not included in the 2020 MTP/SCS. 2020 MTP/SCS Project List Listing updated as of 11-7-2019 ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21121
Project
Development Only ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Aux Lane Project: EB Latrobe Road US-50 EB Latrobe Rd to Silva Valley (T); US 50 $ 1,500,000 Post-2040 ELD19290
Project
Development Only ELD Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Cameron Park Drive to Ponderosa Road
Managed Lane facility - Phase 2B (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 22,637,000 Post-2040 CAL21124 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB Bass Lake Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter EB Bass Lake Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21125 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB Cambridge Rd. Loop Ramp Meter EB Cambridge Rd. Loop Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21126 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB Cameron Park Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter EB Cameron Park Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21122 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB Latrobe Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter EB Latrobe Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 440,683 2026-2030 CAL21127 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB Ponderosa Rd. / S. Shingle Rd. Loop Ramp Meter EB Ponderosa Rd. / S. Shingle Rd. Loop Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21128 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB Shingle Springs Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter EB Shingle Springs Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL20927 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation ED 49 Ped/Bike Access
In El Dorado County on Route 49 from Patterson Dr to Commerce Way (PM

10.7/11.1): Widen shoulders to provide pedestrian and bike access along highway. EA 0H830 $ 2,000,000 $ 945,563 2020-2025
CAL20954 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation ED 50 Apple Hill Pavement Rehab
In and near Placerville, from westbound on-ramp at Schnell School Rd OC (Br#25-63) to 0.1 mile west of Still Meadows Rd; also from 0.5 mile east of Carson Rd to Sawmill UC (Br#25-41) (PM 24.5/R28.8): CAPM and drainage improvements. SHOPP ID 15994 $ 39,050,000 $ 87,337,556 2026-2030 CAL21009 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation ED 50 Echo Summit Pavement Rehab
In El Dorado County from Sierra-At-Tahoe Road to Pioneer Trail in Meyers.

SHOPP ID 18420 $ 35,238,000 $ 35,702,495 2026-2030
CAL21044 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation ED 50 Ice House Rd Pavement Rehab
In El Dorado County on Route 50 from Ice House Rd to Strawberry Lodge:

CAPM. SHOPP ID 20489 $ 18,650,000 $ 18,154,203 2026-2030 CAL21056 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation ED 50 Riverton Drainage Rehab
In El Dorado County on Route 50 approx. 15 miles east of Placerville from Peavine Ridge Rd to 1.0 mile west of Pyramid Creek Bridge (Br#25-9): CAPM & Drainage. SHOPP ID 21931 $ 44,390,000 $ 17,057,641 2026-2030 CAL21037 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation ED 50 Shingle Springs Pavement Rehab
In El Dorado County on Route 50 from Cambrdge Rd OC (Br#25-0083) to El Dorado Road OC (#25-0076): CAPM. SHOPP ID 20401 $ 15,360,000 $ 18,032,363 2026-2030 CAL20999 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
In El Dorado County from Kyburz Dr to Strawberry Lodge Dr.

CIR w/HMA Overlay.

In El Dorado County from Kyburz Dr to Strawberry Lodge Dr. CIR w/HMA Overlay. SHOPP ID 17916 $ 6,200,000 $ 7,936,524 2026-2030 CAL21132 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS NB Cameron Park Dr. Loop Ramp Meter NB Cameron Park Dr. Loop Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21018 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Placerville MTCE Mechanic shop Placerville Resident Mechanic SHOPP ID 18466 $ 2,600,000 $ 3,328,220 2026-2030 ELD19406
Project
Development Only ELD Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Ponderosa Road to Greenstone Road
Managed Lane facility - Phase 3 (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 34,730,208 Post-2040 CAL21131 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SB Cameron Park Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter US-50 WB Cameron Park Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 * Programmed project information updated as of MTIP 2019-18 amendment. Page 1 of 97 2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21235 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SB Ponderosa Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter SB Ponderosa Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL20868 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 193 Cool Pavement Rehabilitation
In El Dorado County on Route 193 from Jct Rte 49 to Pilgram Rd. SHOPP ID 20552 $ 5,700,000 $ 7,118,519 2026-2030
CAL21052 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 193 Georgetown Pavement Rehabilitation In El Dorado County on Route 193 from Greenwood Rd to Jct SR 49/End of County. SHOPP ID 20553 $ 15,400,000 $ 19,232,490 2026-2030 CAL20747 Programmed ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 193 Slope Stabilization
Near Placerville, on SR 193 at 1.1 miles north of the South Fork American River Bridge (PM 22.8/22.9); also at 2.5 miles north of the South Fork American River Bridge (PM 24.2/24.3) - Restore embankment slope slip-outs [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1086] (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON; SR 193, PM

22.8-24.3; EA 1H600 $ 9,545,000 2020-2025
CAL20634 Planned ELD Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped SR 49 - Construct Class II Bike Lane On SR 49, from Southview Ct. in Placerville (south of US 50) to Gold Hill Rd (Approximately 5 miles north of US 50), where feasible Construct Class II Bike Lane $ 2,880,000 $ 4,275,376 2036-2040
CAL20936 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 49 Pavement Rehabilitation A
In El Dorado County in and near Diamond Springs from 0.5 miles North of Maisy Lane to Coon Hollow Road. Pavement Rehab. SHOPP ID 13330 $ 32,650,000 $ 35,720,007 2026-2030 CAL21043 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 49 Pavement Rehabilitation B
In El Dorado County on Route 49 from approx. 0.1 mile north of Rattlesnake Bar Rd to the county line; also in Placer County on Route 49 from El Dorado County Line to Junction of Route 80 in Auburn (PM 0.0/3.1): CAPM. SHOPP ID 20486 $ 14,200,000 $ 11,775,864 2026-2030
CAL20717 Programmed ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 50 Bridge Rehab at Sawmill UC
Near Pollock Pines, SR 50, at Sawmill Undercrossing #25-0041 (PM R27.9/R29.8); also at Sly Park Road (PM R30.17/R31.3) - Replace bridge, restore culverts and add highway lighting [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1029] (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON. EA 0H341 $ 11,494,000 2020-2025 CAL18190 Programmed ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation US 50 - Camino Operational / Safety Improvements Near Placerville and Camino, US 50, from 0.2 mile west of Still Meadows Road to 0.4 mile east of Upper Carson Road (PM 21.9/24.5) - Install median barrier, widen shoulders, construct acceleration/deceleration lane, construct an undercrossing and construct access to the undercrossing from local roads [SHOPP CTIPS ID 107-0000-1030] [Caltrans is the lead agency for the project. El Dorado County, Community Development Agency, Transportation Division is a participating agency.] HSIP7-03-008. Toll Credits for ROW $ 55,437,620 2020-2025 CAL20718 Programmed ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS US 50 Advance Warning and ITS
In El Dorado County, US 50, from the Sacramento County Line to east of Stateline Avenue (PM 0.0/80.4) - Upgrade new Transportation Management System elements. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON. EA 0H520 $ 13,000,000 2020-2025 CAL20734 Programmed ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation US 50 Cameron Park Safety
On US 50 in Cameron Park at Cameron Park Drive: Improve sight distance and upgrade curb ramps [PM 6.5] (CTIPS ID 107-0000-1075) (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 2,422,000 2020-2025
CAL20716 Programmed ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation US 50 Guard Rail Upgrade
In El Dorado County, US 50, at various locations from Red Hawk Undercrossing to 1.9 miles west of Route 89 (PM 11.20/68.70) - Upgrade guard rail to current standards (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON. EA 0H500 $ 4,506,000 2020-2025 CAL21061 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation US 50 Point View Dr Landscape Rehabilitation In El Dorado County on Route 50 from EB off ramp at Point View Dr to approx.

0.2 mile west of Newtown Rd. Highway Planting Rehab. SHOPP ID 20607 $ 1,040,000 $ 1,331,288 2026-2030 CAL20820
Project
Development Only ELD Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation US 50 Reconstruct Shingle Springs interchange Reconstruct Shingle Springs Interchange $ 30,000,000 Post-2040 CAL20649
Project
Development Only ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS US 50 WB Auxiliary Lane
In Placerville, from west of Coloma Road offramp to the Placerville Drive offramp, Construct WB Auxiliary Lane (PM 17/19) $ 20,000,000 Post-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21129 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS WB Bass Lake Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter WB Bass Lake Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 440,683 2026-2030 CAL21130 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS WB Cambridge Rd. Loop Ramp Meter WB Cambridge Rd. Loop Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21133 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS WB Shingle Springs Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter WB Shingle Springs Dr. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21262 Planned ELD Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS WB US 50 Placerville Dr/Forni Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter WB US 50 Placerville Dr/Forni Rd. Diagonal Ramp Meter $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 ELD19423 Planned ELD City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Broadway Bike Lanes Broadway in Placerville - add bike facility: Main Street to Blairs Lane $ 300,000 $ 315,188 2020-2025 ELD19257 Programmed ELD City of Placerville
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Clay St. / Hangtown Creek Bridge
Clay St. over Hangtown Creek, 150' north of Main St.: Replace 1 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for ROW & CON). Toll Credits for ROW, CON $ 4,308,864 2020-2025 ELD19418
Project
Development Only ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Coleman Street Extension
Construct 150-foot 2-lane roadway with sidewalk and gutter on both sides to extend Coleman Street from Bedford Avenue to Spring Street $ 2,300,000 Post-2040 ELD19419
Project
Development Only ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Combellack Road Extension Road Extension: Combellack Road $ 3,466,000 Post-2040 ELD19441
Project
Development Only ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Immigrant Ravine Road Extension
Construct a new 4,200-foot 2-lane roadway with sidewalk to extend Immigrant Ravine Road from Carson Road to the proposed Clay Street Extension $ 15,422,000 Post-2040 ELD19420
Project
Development Only ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Main Street Realignment
Construct 700-foot of new 2-lane road. Includes sidewalks to City collector street standards between Broadway and Main Street. New road will extend Main Street down Spanish Ravine Road. $ 8,121,768 Post-2040 ELD19443 Planned ELD City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Mallard Lane/Green Valley Road Bike Lanes Install bicycle lanes on Mallard Lane at the intersection of Green Valley Road, and on Green Valley Road from Mallard Lane to Placerville Drive. $ 1,750,000 $ 1,838,594 2020-2025 ELD19447 Planned ELD City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Middletown Road Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on Middletown Road from Canal Street to Cold Springs Road. $ 8,100,000 $ 12,024,496 2036-2040 ELD16070 Programmed ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Mosquito Rd./ Clay St. Park & Bus
Phase II - Construct an additional 50-car parking lot with lighting landscaping, install public restrooms, and install the El Dorado Trail facility. (Also known as Placerville Station Phase 2). Toll Credits for ENG, CON $ 1,645,000 2020-2025 ELD19185 Programmed ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Placerville Dr Bridge Widening
Hangtown Creek Bridge at Placerville Drive, 0.3 mi west of Cold Springs Rd:

Replace existing functionally obsolete 2-lane bridge with a new 4-lane bridge. $ 4,935,550 2020-2025 ELD19509 Programmed ELD City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Placerville Drive Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities In the City of Placerville along Placerville Drive from west of the US 50 undercrossing to Green Valley road: Construct bicycle facilities and sidewalks; on the west side of Green Valley Road from Placerville Drive to Mallard Lane:
construct sidewalk. (Both Class II bike lanes and Class IV bikeways will be evaluated during the preliminary engineering phase.) (CMAQ Emission Reductions in kg/day: ROG 0.08, NOx 0.04, PM10 0.02, PM2.5 0.02). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW $ 11,100,000 2020-2025
ELD19409
Project
Development Only ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Placerville Drive Widening - Fair Lane to Ray Lawyer Drive Widen Placerville Drive from Fair Lane to Ray Lawyer Drive to accomodate 4 lanes of traffic, a dual left turn lane, sidewalks, and bike lanes on both sides. $ 3,169,000 Post-2040 ELD19412 Planned ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Ray Lawyer Drive Extension East
Ray Lawyer Drive Extension East - Construct a new 2,500 ft. 2-lane road to City collector street standard to support future county courthouse joint project with El Dorado County $ 8,122,000 $ 9,895,868 2026-2030

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
ELD19373 Programmed ELD City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Upper Broadway Bike Lanes In Placerville, along Broadway between Schnell School Rd. and Jacquier Rd./Point View Dr.: Construct a Class II bike lane along eastbound Broadway and Class III bike route along westbound Broadway, with minor signing and striping to connect to the El Dorado Trail at each end, and strategically located sidewalks, additional pedestrian improvements, and select transit facilities. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.01 NOx. Toll Credits for PE & ROW) (The project will prepare and process a single CE for NEPA which will cover the overall project which now includes the bike and pedestrian improvements).

Toll Credits for ENG $ 5,869,360 2020-2025
ELD19417 Planned ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
US 50 Broadway Eastbound Exit (#47) - Signalization and ramp lengthening
Lengthen eastboud exit ramp of US 50 at Broadway (#47) and install traffic signal. $ 4,100,000 $ 4,873,612 2026-2030
SAC19519 Programmed ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2.2 - Eastbound
Onramp
Phase 2.2: In the City of Placerville, separate, but geographically adjacent to the Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2 project, at US 50 at Ray Lawyer Drive: Construct eastbout on-ramp. $ 2,765,000 2020-2025 ELD19363 Planned ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 3
Replacement and widening of the Forni Road/Placerville Drive US 50 Overcrossing, improved operations at the Forni Road/Placerville Drive/US 50 interchange, a westbound US 50 offramp and offramps at the existing Ray Lawyer Drive overcrossing, and an eastbound auxiliary lane between the Forni Road/Placerville Drive/ US 50 interchange and the Ray Lawyer Drive interchange. $ 23,374,018 $ 38,301,050 2036-2040
ELD19387 Planned ELD City of Placerville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Wiltse Road Intersection Improvements
Wiltse Road Intersection Improvements/Signalization. Construct 400 feet of 2 lane roadway with sidewalk, curb and gutter both sides. A new bridge over Hangtown Creek. $ 4,728,000 $ 5,620,106 2026-2030
ELD19182 Planned ELD EDCTC
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Aux Lane Project: WB Bass Lake
Interchange Improvements: this phase includes detailed study to determine complete improvements needed; Phase 1 may include ramp widening, road widening, signals, and WB auxiliary lane between Bass Lake and Silva Valley interchanges; Phase 1 assumes bridge replacement. (See ELD19217 for Phase 2) CIP71330 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,457,925 2036-2040
ELD19273 Planned ELD EDCTC
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Aux Lane Project: WB Latrobe Road / ED Hills Blvd WB Latrobe Road/ ED Hills Blvd. to Empire Ranch $ 1,500,000 $ 2,457,925 2036-2040 ELD19215 Planned ELD EDCTC
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Aux Lane Project: WB Silva Valley WB Silva Valley to El Dorado Hills Blvd (T) $ 1,500,000 $ 2,457,925 2036-2040 ELD19224 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Bass Lake Road Widening
Widen and reconstruct Bass Lake Road from US 50 to Serrano Parkway to 4- lane divided road. Includes a median, sidewalk and bike lanes. (CIP66109) $ 14,257,000 $ 17,370,770 2026-2030 ELD19337 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Bassi Rd/Granite Creek Bridge Replacement Bassi Rd, over Granite Creek, 0.3 mi N/W of Lotus Rd. Replace this structurally deficient 1-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, R/W, & CON.) (CIP77128). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,325,000 2020-2025 ELD19321 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Bucks Bar Rd/North Fork Cosumnes River Bridge Replacement Bucks Bar Rd over north fork of Cosumnes River, 1.2 miles north of Mount Aukum Rd: Replace existing 1 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge, including approaches. (CIP77116) $ 8,556,940 2020-2025
ELD19424 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Cameron Park Drive Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on entire length of Cameron Park Drive. (CIP72307) $ 162,000 $ 192,567 2026-2030 ELD15930 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Cameron Park Drive Widening - Palmer Drive to Sudbury Road Widen Cameron Park Drive to 4 lanes (divided) from Palmer Drive to Sudbury Road Includes a curb, gutter, and sidewalk. (CIP 72143/36105004) $ 8,687,000 $ 9,354,949 2020-2025 ELD19527 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Camino Agritourism Congestion Relief Project Phase 1 Includes innovative technology-based solutions to address yearly congestion in Camino, as well as ITS, signage, planning studies, etc. $ 5,000,000 $ 5,384,453 2020-2025 ELD19425 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Carson Road Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on Carson Road from Jacquier Road to Larsen Drive (on climbing shoulder). $ 787,500 $ 1,169,048 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
ELD19350 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
Clear Creek Rd/Clear Creek (0.25 mi E of Sly Park Rd) Bridge Replacement
Clear Creek Rd over Clear Creek, 0.25 mi east of Sly Park Rd.: Replace 1-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, & CON.) (CIP 77139/36105006). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,457,000 2020-2025 ELD19351 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
Clear Creek Rd/Clear Creek (1.82 mi E of Sly Park Rd) Bridge Replacement
Clear Creek Rd over Clear Creek, 1.82 miles east of Sly Park Rd.: Replace 1-lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP77138/36105005). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,373,000 2020-2025 ELD19426 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Coach Lane Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on entire length of Coach Lane. $ 131,250 $ 156,015 2026-2030 ELD19429 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Country Club Drive Bike Lanes Phase 1: Install bike lanes on Country Club Drive from Bass Lake Road to Cambridge Road $ 350,000 $ 416,040 2026-2030
ELD19227 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Country Club Drive Extension - Bass Lake Road to Tong Road Construct 2-lane extension of Country Club Drive from Tong Road to Bass Lake Road. Roadway includes 8-foot paved shoulders, curb, and gutter (CIP# 71361) $ 13,258,000 $ 16,153,586 2026-2030 ELD19229 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
Country Club Drive Extension - El Dorado Hills Blvd to Silva Valley Parkway
Construct new 2-lane extension of Country Club Drive from El Dorado Hills Blvd to Silva Valley Parkway. Includes curb, gutter, and sidewalk on both sides. (CIP# 72377) $ 11,451,000 $ 17,859,652 2036-2040
ELD19228 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
Country Club Drive Extension - Silva Valley Parkway to Tong Road
Construct new 2-lane extension of Country Club Drive from Silva Valley Parkway to Tong Road. Includes curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides. (CIP 71362/36105008) $ 6,930,000 $ 8,443,532 2026-2030
ELD15990 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Diamond Springs Pkwy - Phase 1B
Construct new 2-lane divided arterial roadway from Missouri Flat Rd east of Golden Center Dr to a new T-intersection with SR-49 south of Bradley Dr; includes planning, environmental clearance, grading and right of way for the ultimate 4-lane road, required improvements to SR-49 and three new signals.

See ELD19348/CIP72375 for Phase 1A and ELD19203/CIP72368 for Phase 2. (CIP72334) $ 28,223,366 2020-2025
ELD19510 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation El Dorado Hills Boulevard Overlay Project Roadway overlay, ADA ramp improvements, Class II bike lanes, and bicycle and pedestrian loop detection improvements at all intersections from Saratoga Way/Park Drive to Brittany Place.. Toll Credits for ENG $ 5,397,285 2020-2025 ELD19528 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS El Dorado Hills ITS
ITS technology implementation along major signalized corridors in the El Dorado Hills area, including El Dorado Hills Boulevard, Latrobe Road, White Rock Road, and Silva Valley Parkway. $ 5,000,000 $ 6,092,014 2026-2030 ELD19380 Programmed ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped
El Dorado Trail - Missouri Flat Road Bike/Pedestrian
Overcrossing
Construct a multi-use bike and ped over-crossing structure with a 12 to 14 foot wide concrete deck on the El Dorado Trail over Missouri Flat Road. (Emission benefits in kg/day: 0.07 ROG, 0.04 NOx, 0.02 PM10)(CIP #97015) (Toll Credits for PE, ROW). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW $ 5,203,000 2020-2025 ELD19371 Programmed ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Trail Ext. - Missouri Flat Rd to El Dorado Rd El Dorado Trail, from Missouri Flat Rd to El Dorado Rd: Construct Class I multiuse bike/ped path, approximately 2.54 miles. Improvements include: 10-foot wide paved path, signage, roadway crossing at Forni/Blanchard Rds, and unpaved nature trail adjacent to the bike path. (Toll credits for PE & ROW) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.05 ROG, 0.03 NOx, 0.01 PM 10). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW $ 4,394,000 2020-2025
ELD19433 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Enterprise Drive Bike Route Install bicycle route signs and markings on entire length of Enterprise Drive. $ 1,000 $ 1,485 2036-2040 ELD19536 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Enterprise Drive/Missouri Flat Road Signalization Includes signalization, turn lanes, utility relocation. (CIP 73365/36105052) $ 2,484,000 $ 2,484,000 2020-2025 ELD19434 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Gold Hill Road Bike Route Install bicycle route signs and markings on Gold Hill Road from State Route 49 to Lotus Road. $ 4,000 $ 4,755 2026-2030
ELD19253 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Green Valley Rd Widening - Francisco Dr to Silva Valley Parkway Widen existing Green Valley Rd from Francisco Dr to Silva Valley Parkway from two to four lanes; inculdes curb gutter and sidewalk. (CIP GP178/36105018) $ 6,421,000 $ 9,532,011 2036-2040 ELD19335 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Green Valley Rd/Indian Creek Bridge Replacement Green Valley Rd, over Indian Creek, 0.9 miles north of Greenstone Rd. Replace existing 2 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. (CIP 77127/36105014) $ 5,614,000 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
ELD19353 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Green Valley Rd/Mound Springs Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Green Valley Rd over Mound Springs Creek, 0.8 miles west of Missouri Flat Rd.

Replace functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. No added lane capacity. (CIP 77136/36105015) $ 5,638,000 2020-2025
ELD19354 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Greenstone Rd/Slate Creek Bridge Replacement Greenstone Rd over Slate Creek, 0.5 miles north of Mother Lode Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP 77137/36105019). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 3,643,000 2020-2025 ELD19352 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Hanks Exchange Rd/Squaw Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Hanks Exchange Rd over Squaw Hollow Creek, 0.4 miles south of Pleasant Valley Rd.: Replace existing 1-lane bridge with new 2-lane bridge. Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP 77135/36105020). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,087,000 2020-2025 ELD19342 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Hazel Valley Rd/EID Canal Bridge Replacement Hazel Valley Rd, over E.I.D Canal, 0.8 miles southeast of SR50: Replace functionally obsolete 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP 77125/36105021). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 3,639,000 2020-2025
ELD19245 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Headington Rd Ext - Missouri Flat to El Dorado Construct new 2-lane arterial with median extension of Headington Rd from Missouri Flat Rd to El Dorado Rd. Does include curb, gutter or sidewalk. (CIP71375) $ 6,747,000 $ 10,015,959 2036-2040
ELD19522 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Industrial Drive/Missouri Flat Road Signalization Includes signalization, turn lanes, utility relocation. (CIP 73366/36105053) $ 2,150,000 $ 2,150,000 2020-2025 ELD19240 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Improvements (Phase 2) Minor ITS Improvement: Deployment of various ITS improvements along U.S. 50 and regionally significant corridors in the County. Includes: implementation of ITS projects listed and prioritized in El Dorado County. (See ELD19239 for Phase 1) $ 5,000,000 $ 8,193,082 2036-2040
ELD19523
Project
Development Only ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Intersection Improvements
Intersection Improvements to increase capacity at various locations. Projects could include signalization, channelization, ITS improvements, etc. $ 37,065,000 Post-2040 ELD19239 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS ITS Improvements - Phase 1
Identification of various Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) improvements along US 50 and regionally significant corridors in the County; projects may include upgrading all controllers, building the communications infrastructure, adding CCTVs, adding DMS, connecting all the signals. (See ELD19240 for Phase 2) $ 5,833,200 $ 9,558,377 2036-2040
ELD19438 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Jacquier Road Bike Lanes Placerville City limit to Carson Road $ 175,000 $ 208,020 2026-2030 ELD19236 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Latrobe Rd Widening - Golden Foothill Pkwy to Investment Blvd Widen Latrobe Rd from Golden Foothill Pkwy (south end) to Investment Blvd from 2-lanes undivided to 4-lanes divided with curb, gutter, and Class II bike lanes; modify signal at Investment Blvd. (CIP Unfunded Project List 81/72350) $ 3,516,000 $ 5,483,760 2036-2040 ELD19439 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Latrobe Road Bike Lanes Investment Boulevard to Deer Creek/SPTC $ 525,000 $ 779,365 2036-2040 ELD19232 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Latrobe Road Connection
Intersection improvements at Golden Foothill Parkway (south) and Carson Crossing Drive. Sidewalk, curb and gutter are not TIM Fee Funded (CIP 66116/36105024) $ 747,000 $ 910,147 2026-2030
ELD19440 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Lotus Road Bike Lanes Phase 1: Gold Hill Road to SR 49 $ 525,000 $ 624,060 2026-2030 ELD19444 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Marshall Road Bike Lanes Class II bike lanes from the top of Prospectors Road to Black Oak Mine Road $ 525,000 $ 624,060 2026-2030 ELD19445 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Marshall Road Bike Route Class III Bike Route on Marshall Road from Black Oak Mine Road to SR 193 $ 20,000 $ 23,774 2026-2030 ELD19446 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Meder Road Bike Lanes Phase 1: Cameron Park Drive to Paloran Court $ 175,000 $ 208,020 2026-2030 ELD19333 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Metal Beam Guardrail Installation - Various Locations Construction/reconstruction of guardrail at various locations throughout the County. Listed locations are those most in need and for which FHWA HSIP grant funds are anticipated to be available. As funding permits, addtional locations will be identified. (CIP OP005/36105026) $ 672,000 $ 997,588 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
ELD19396 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Missouri Flat Rd Widening, Headington Rd to Prospector's Plaza Add 1 lane in each direction with a raised median (CIP GP 165) $ 1,299,000 $ 2,128,563 2036-2040 ELD19448 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Missouri Flat Road Bike Lanes Phase 1 Phase 1: Campus Drive to existing Class II on the south side of US 50 $ 350,000 $ 416,040 2026-2030 ELD19449 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Missouri Flat Road Bike Lanes Phase 2 Phase 2: Golden Center Drive near Wal-Mart to Pleasant Valley Road $ 175,000 $ 208,020 2026-2030 ELD19534 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
Missouri Flat Road Widening - China Garden Rd to Pleasant Valley Road/SR49
Widening of Missouri Flat Road from China Garden to Pleasant Valley Road/State Route 49. Work includes widing the road to 4 lanes, sidewalk, curb, and gutter. (CIP 72142/36105027) $ 4,175,000 $ 6,511,575 2036-2040 ELD19340 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Mosquito Rd/South Fork American River Bridge Replacement Mosquito Rd, over South Fork American River, 5.7 miles north of US 50:

Replace existing structurally deficient 1 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP 77126/36105028). High Cost Project agreement required.. Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 71,814,000 2020-2025 ELD19241
Project
Development Only ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Mother Lode Dr/Pleasant Valley Rd - Signalization Reconfigure existing "Y" all-way stop to a signalized "T" intersection including turn pockets and shoulder improvements. CIP73307 $ 7,782,300 Post-2040 ELD19451 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Mother Lode Drive Bike Lanes Phase 1: Missouri Flat Road to Lindberg Ave $ 175,000 $ 208,020 2026-2030 ELD19339 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Mt. Murphy Rd/South Fork American River Bridge Replacement Mt Murphy Rd, over South Fork American River, 0.1 mile east of SR49. Replace existing 1 lane truss bridge with new 2 lane bridge. Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW, and CON. (CIP 77129/36105029). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 32,107,000 2020-2025
ELD19322 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Newtown Rd/South Fork Weber Creek - Bridge Rehab Newtown Rd., Over S Fork Weber Cr., 0.7Mi W Of Snows Rd. Replace existing 2 lane bridge. (CIP 77122/36105030) $ 5,658,000 2020-2025 ELD19355 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Oak Hill Rd/Squaw Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Oak Hill Rd over Squaw Hollow Creek, 0.6 miles south of Pleasant Valley Rd:

Replace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP 77134/36105031). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,074,000 2020-2025 ELD19452 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Old Bass Lake Rd Æ’?? EDH to Bass Lake Connection Phase 1: EDH to Bass Lake Connection. Between gates, using existing roadway as Class I path from Tong Road to Old Bass Lake Road. $ 200,000 $ 237,737 2026-2030 ELD19453 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Palmer Drive Bike Lanes Add bike lanes along full length of Palmer Drive $ 87,500 $ 129,894 2036-2040 ELD19454 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Palmer Drive Bike Path Connection From Wild Chaparral Drive to Palmer Drive $ 200,000 $ 210,125 2020-2025 ELD19458 Planned ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes A Big Cut Road to Sly Park Road $ 1,575,000 $ 1,872,180 2026-2030 ELD19456 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes Phase 1 Phase 1: Big Cut Road to Missouri Flat Road $ 350,000 $ 519,577 2036-2040 ELD19457 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes Phase 2 Phase 2: Missouri Flat Road to Mother Lode Drive $ 525,000 $ 779,365 2036-2040 ELD19459 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Ponderosa Road Bike Lanes US 50 to Meder Road $ 131,250 $ 194,841 2036-2040 ELD19460 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Prospectors Road Class III Bike Route Class III bike route on the entire length of Prospectors Road $ 12,500 $ 18,556 2036-2040 ELD19524 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Safety Improvements
Safety improvements at various locations throughout the County. Includes intersections, curves, and roadway segments $ 2,400,000 $ 3,932,679 2036-2040 ELD19234 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Saratoga Wy. (Phase 2)
Phase 2 will widen the existing two-lane road to four-lanes from the Sacramento County line to El Dorado Hills Boulevard with full curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north side only. Environmental clearance and preliminary engineering will be completed under Phase 1 project CIP#71324. $ 3,300,000 $ 4,779,384 2031-2035 ELD19255
Project
Development Only ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Silva Valley Pkwy/Golden Eagle Ln - Signalization Signalize intersection at Silva Valley Pkwy and Golden Eagle Ln (Silva Valley Elem School). CIP#GP182 $ 768,000 Post-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
ELD19338 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Silver Fork Rd/South Fork American River Bridge Rehab Silver Fork Rd over South Fork American River , 0.1 miles southeast of US 50:

Rehabilitate existing 2 lane bridge. No added lane capacity. 11/2/2010: Toll credits programmed for PE, R/W, & CON. (CIP 77124). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 3,353,006 2020-2025
ELD19463 Planned ELD El Dorado County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SPTC/El Dorado Trail B Class I Bike Path from El Dorado to Mother Lode Drive in Shingle Springs $ 2,400,000 $ 3,562,813 2036-2040 ELD19437 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SR 49 Realignment B SR 49 Realignment $ 28,800,000 $ 42,753,762 2036-2040 ELD19529 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Eastbound - Bass Lake Road to Cambridge Road
This project consists of widening US 50 and adding an auxiliary lane to eastbound US 50 connecting Bass Lake Road Interchange and the Cambridge Road Interchange. Timing of construction to be concurrent with or after the Bass Lake Road Interchange Improvements project (CIP 71330/36104005). (CIP GP148/36104018) $ 9,404,000 $ 14,667,031 2036-2040
ELD19521 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Eastbound - Cameron Park Drive to
Ponderosa Road
Project provides eastbound continuous auxiliary lane from Cameron Park Drive Interchange to Ponderosa Road Interchange as determined necessary in the US 50/Cameron Park Drive PSR/PDS dated October 2008. (CIP 53127/36104020) $ 8,926,000 $ 13,921,514 2036-2040 ELD19530 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Eastbound - Sacramento County Line to El Dorado Hills Blvd
Widening US 50 and adding an auxiliary lane to eastbound US 50 from El Dorado Hills Boulevard/Latrobe Road Interchange. This project will eventully connect to the City of Folsom's future Empire Ranch Road Interchange. Timing of construction to be concurrent with El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange (71323) or Empire Ranch Interchange. The City of Folsom is planning the update to the CEQA/NEPA for the Empire Ranch Interchange Environmental Impact Report.(CIP# 53125) $ 6,934,000 $ 10,814,674 2036-2040
ELD19532 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Westbound - Cameron Park Dr to
Cambridge Rd
Widening US 50 and adding an auxiliary lane to westbound US 50, connecting Cameron Park Drive Interchange to Cambridge Road Interchange. (CIP 53US50/36104028) $ 11,900,000 $ 18,559,939 2036-2040
ELD19531 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Westbound - Ponderosa Rd to Cameron Park Dr
Widening US 50 and adding an auxiliary lane to westbound US 50, connecting Cameron Park Drive Interchange to Ponderosa Road Interchange. Timing of construction to be concurrent with or after the Ponderosa Road Interchange Improvments project (71333/36104010). (CIP 53128/36104024) $ 9,543,000 $ 14,883,823 2036-2040 ELD19397
Project
Development Only ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
US 50 Westbound Auxiliary Lane - Cambridge Road to Bass Lake Road
This project consists of widening US 50 and adding an auxiliary lane to westbound US 50 connecting Cambridge Road Interchange to Bass Lake Road Interchange. (GP149) $ 9,250,000 Post-2040
ELD19181 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity US 50/Cambridge Rd Interchange
Phase 1 Improvements to Cambridge Road Interchange. Phase I project consists of widening the existing eastbound and westbound off-ramps; addition of new westbound on-ramp from southbound Cambridge Road; reconstruction of the local intersections to provide for additional capacity, both turning and through; and the installation of traffic signals at eastbound ramp
terminal intersection. Also includes preliminary engineering for Phase 2 improvements to Cambridge Interchange. This project shall also be coordinated with the US 50 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane from Bass Lake Road Interchange to Cambridge Road Interchange (GP148/36104018), US 50 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane
from Cambridge Road Interchange to Cameron Park Interchange (53126/36104019). (CIP 71332/36104006) $ 9,173,000 $ 13,617,370 2036-2040 ELD19177 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity US 50/Cameron Park Dr Interchange Improvements Interchange Improvements: this project includes detailed study to identify capacity improvements alternatives and selection of preferred alternative; assumes reconstruction of existing US50 bridges to widen Cameron Park Dr to 8 lanes under the overcrossing; road and ramp widenings. (CIP 72361/36104007) $ 61,116,000 $ 100,145,682 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
ELD19345 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
US 50/El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange Eastbound Ramps
(Phase 2B)
Part of larger project to reconstruct the interchange and widen Latrobe Rd/El Dorado Hills Boulevard. Coplete reconstruction is being phased to align improvement needs, construction staging within US 50 corridor, and available funding. This phase improves on-/off-ramps for eastbound US 50 and widens Latrobe Road/El Dorado Hills Boulevard. Design to be coordinated with US 50 Westbound Auxilliary Lane from El Dorado Hills Blvd. Interchange to the County Line (53115/36104021) and US 50 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane from County Line to El Dorado Hills Blvd. Interchange (53125/36104017). (CIP 71323/36104001) $ 9,196,000 $ 9,903,086 2020-2025
ELD19173 Planned ELD El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped US 50/El Dorado Hills Blvd Pedestrian Overcrossing Construct ped/bike overcrossing over US 50 just east of El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange; includes a Class 1 mixed-use path; Construction and ROW acquisition for 10-ft wide sidewalk and adjacent retaining walls, barriers, railings and landscape replacement included with CIP71323/36104001. (CIP71340) $ 6,783,000 $ 10,069,402 2036-2040
ELD19178 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity US 50/El Dorado Rd Interchange - Phase 1
Phase 1 project includes sinalization and widening of existing ramps and minor widening/lane adjustments on El Dorado Road. See project 71376/36104012 for Phase 2 improvements. (CIP 71347/36104011) $ 5,488,000 $ 8,146,967 2036-2040 ELD19272
Project
Development Only ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity US 50/El Dorado Rd Interchange - Phase 2
Project would involve construction of left and right turn lanes and additional through traffic lanes as follows: noth/southbound El Dorado Road, and east/westbound on-/off-ramps for US 50. Will require either widening of the existing El Dorado Road/US50 overcrossing structure and/or construction of a new adjacent structure. Refer to 2000 PSR. See project No. 71347/36104011 for Phase 1 improvements. (CIP 71376/36104012) $ 11,165,000 Post-2040 ELD19244 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS US 50/Ponderosa Rd Interchange - Durock Rd Realignment Realign approx. 1/4 mile of Durock Rd toSouth Shingle Road/Sunset Ln and signalize new intersection. Durock Rd will be two through lanes with turn pockets at the intersection. this project is part of a larger project, US 50/Ponderoas Road/South Shingle Road Interchange (71333/36104010).

Preliminary engineering shall be perforned under the interchange project.

Work needs to be coordinated with US 50 Ponderosa Road/South Shingle Road Ingerchange (7133/36104010), US 50/Ponderosa Road Interchnage - N. Shingle Road Realingment (project 71339/36104009) andUS 50 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane from Cameron Park Drive Interchange to Ponderosa Road Interchange (53127/36104020). (CIP 71338/36104008) $ 10,521,000 $ 15,618,484 2036-2040 ELD19170 Planned ELD El Dorado County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS US 50/Ponderosa Rd Interchange - N. Shingle Rd Realignment Realign approx. 1/4 mile of N. Shingle Rd about 600 ft north at Ponderosa Rd; realign WB off-ramp to align with Wild Chaparral Dr; and signalize the new intersection. Realigned N. Shingle Rd will be two through lanes with turn pockets at the intersection. Part of a loarger Project for the reconstruction of the US50/Ponderosa Road/South Shingle Road interchange (7133/36104010).

Preliminary Engineering for this phase shall be performed under the interchange project. Work needs to be coordinated with 7133/36104010, 71338/36104008, and 53128/36104024. (CIP 71339/36104009) $ 7,385,000 $ 10,963,074 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
ELD19180 Programmed ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity US 50/Ponderosa Rd/So. Shingle Rd Interchange Improvements Project provides capacity improvements to the interchange, includes a detailed study to identify
a preferred alternative. This phase of the project includes the widening of the existing US 50
overcrossing to accommodate five lanes and the realignment of the westbound loop on-ramp,
ramp widenings, and widening of Ponderosa Road, Mother Lode Drive and South Shingle
Road. Preliminary engineering for all phases (projects 71333/36104010, 71338/36104008 and
71339/36104009) shall be performed under the interchange project. This project requires the
construction of US 50 /Ponderosa Road - North Shingle Road Realignment (project
71338/36104008) and US 50 / Ponderosa Road Interchange - Durock Road Realignment
(project 71339/36104009). This project shall also be coordinated with US 50 Eastbound
Auxiliary Lanes - Cameron Park Interchange to Ponderosa Road Interchange (53127/36104020), and US 50 Westbound Auxiliary Lanes - Ponderosa Road Interchange to
Cameron Park Drive Interchange (53128/36104024). (CIP 7133/36104010) $ 24,064,000 2031-2035 ELD19291 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity US 50/Silva Valley Pkwy Interchange - Phase 2
Final phase of US 50/Silva Valley Parkway Interchange. Due to future growth in the area this project will be necessary to accomodate traffic projected for 2030. Project includes eastbound diagonal and westbound loop on-ramps to US 50. Project is in the preliminary planning phase. (CIP 71345/36104004) $ 8,156,000 $ 12,107,628 2036-2040 ELD19525 Planned ELD El Dorado County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
White Rock Road Widening - Windfield Way to Sacramento
County Line
Widen White Rock Road between the County line and Windfield Way from two to four-lane divided roadway with curb, gutter and Class I bike/pedestrian trail and/or an on-street Class II bike facility. This roadway is part of the Capital Southeast Connector.(CIP 72381/36105041) $ 4,404,000 $ 5,365,846 2026-2030 ELD19461 Planned ELD
El Dorado County
Transit
E- Transit Capital
(Major) Regional Fueling Station Develop a regional fueling station near the Sacramento/El Dorado County Line. $ 20,310,000 $ 23,553,373 2026-2030 VAR56145 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Continued Signal Coordination Improvements 2010-2020 Continued Signal Coordination Improvements $ 50,000 $ 74,225 2036-2040 VAR56146 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Critical Intersection Improvements Critical Intersection Improvements $ 5,000,000 $ 5,253,125 2031-2035 VAR56155 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
Highway Advisory Radio Deployment and Weather Stations
Æ’?? integrate with Caltrans
Highway Advisory Radio Deployment and Weather Stations integrate with Caltrans $ 6,500,000 $ 6,829,063 2031-2035
VAR56156 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
Install Animal Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems-Hwy 49 and US 50 Install Animal Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems-Hwy 49 and US 50 $ 150,000 $ 157,594 2031-2035 VAR56157 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3 A- Bike & Ped Install bicycle loop detection at all major intersections B Install bicycle loop detection at all major intersections $ 6,000 $ 6,304 2031-2035 VAR56159 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Install Downhill Speed Warning System on U.S. 50 Near Camino Install Downhill Speed Warning System on U.S. 50 Near Camino $ 100,000 $ 105,063 2031-2035

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
VAR56160 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Install Ice Detection and Warning Systems Install Ice Detection and Warning Systems $ 200,000 $ 210,125 2031-2035 VAR56161 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
Install Rock/Mudslide and Avalanche Detection and Warning System Install Rock/Mudslide and Avalanche Detection and Warning System $ 200,000 $ 210,125 2031-2035 VAR56163 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Landslide Sensor Integration Project Landslide Sensor Integration Project $ 60,000 $ 71,321 2026-2030 VAR56164 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Long-Term Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS Long-Term Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS $ 900,000 $ 1,069,817 2026-2030 VAR56165 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
D- Programs &
Planning Long-Term Regional ITS Plan Update Long-Term Regional ITS Plan Update $ 200,000 $ 237,737 2026-2030 VAR56167 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
D- Programs &
Planning Medium-Term Regional ITS Plan Update Medium-Term Regional ITS Plan Update $ 200,000 $ 237,737 2026-2030 VAR56168 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Placerville Signal System Technology Advances Placerville Signal System Technology Advances $ 800,000 $ 950,949 2026-2030 VAR56170 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS Latrobe Road/El Dorado Hills Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS Latrobe Road/El Dorado Hills $ 900,000 $ 1,069,817 2026-2030 VAR56172 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
D- Programs &
Planning Remote Traffic Control Workstation Remote Traffic Control Workstation $ 8,000 $ 9,509 2026-2030 VAR56176 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Traffic Control System (TCS) Upgrade Traffic Control System (TCS) Upgrade $ 30,000 $ 44,535 2036-2040 VAR56177 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Traffic Control System Procurement Traffic Control System Procurement $ 250,000 $ 371,126 2036-2040 VAR56178 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Traveler Information Dissemination Devices at Key Locations Traveler Information Dissemination Devices at Key Locations $ 300,000 $ 445,352 2036-2040 VAR56179 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS US 50 Surveillance US 50 Surveillance $ 1,100,000 $ 1,632,956 2036-2040 VAR56180 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS US 50 Traveler Information US 50 Traveler Information $ 1,500,000 $ 2,226,758 2036-2040 VAR56181 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
Caltrans District 3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation US 50 Winter Traffic Management US 50 Winter Traffic Management $ 250,000 $ 262,656 2020-2025 VAR56137 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
El Dorado Hills
CSD
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Bass Lake Road Bike Lanes Class II Bike Lanes from Green Valley Road to US 50 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,457,925 2036-2040 VAR56142 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
El Dorado Hills
CSD A- Bike & Ped
Bike Path Parallel to US 50 on the north side -EDH to Bass Lake Connection
Phase 2: EDH to Bass Lake Connection From Silva Valley Road to El Dorado Hills Village Center Shopping Center $ 300,000 $ 491,585 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
VAR56148 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
El Dorado Hills
CSD A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike Lanes Phase 1: Saratoga Way to Governor Drive/St. Andrews $ 297,500 $ 487,488 2036-2040 VAR56149 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
El Dorado Hills
CSD A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike Path
Phase 2: Utilizing an existing golf cart undercrossing of Serrano Parkway, extend the bike path from the current terminus at Serrano Parkway to Raley?s Center $ 200,000 $ 327,723 2036-2040
VAR56151 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
El Dorado Hills
CSD A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Hills to Bass Lake Connection (phase 1) Class III Bike Route on Tong Road, Class III Bike Route on Old Bass Lake Road. $ 25,000 $ 40,965 2036-2040 VAR56173 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
El Dorado Hills
CSD A- Bike & Ped Silva Valley Road Bike Lanes From the new connection with White Rock Road to Green Valley Road $ 700,000 $ 1,147,032 2036-2040 VAR56174 Planned ELD
El Dorado County,
El Dorado Hills
CSD A- Bike & Ped SPTC/El Dorado Trail A Class I Bike Path from Latrobe Road to County Line $ 2,800,000 $ 4,156,616 2036-2040 VAR56198 Programmed ELD FHWA
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Ice House Road Rehab
Eldorado National Forest, Ice House Road, for 17.5 miles: Rehabilitate road. (CA FLAP ED CR147(2)) (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for CON $ 5,000,000 2020-2025 VAR56175 Planned ELD
Multiple Lead
Agencies
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS STARNET Integration B STARNET Integration, El Dorado County, Caltrans District 3, SACOG $ 40,000 $ 47,547 2026-2030 CAL20928 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Auburn Mtce Station Install wash facility $ 975,000 $ 1,597,651 2036-2040 CAL21280 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Beg of Pla-49 at various locations to End of Pla-49. Install new ITS systems.

Beg of Pla-49 at various locations to End of Pla-49. Install new ITS systems.

SHOPP ID 16151 $ 3,960,000 $ 5,069,135 2026-2030
CAL20844 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Blue Canyon Truck Climbing
In Placer County on Route 80 at 3 locations from Applegate to EB off-ramp to Nyack (PM R26.5/28.8, 39.5/41.3, 53.0/54.7): Roadway rehabilitation. EA 3H590 $ 113,500,000 2026-2030
CAL20971 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Colfax Narrows Segment 3
WB Long Ravine UP to Magra OC. Add shoulders in WB direction. Investigate truck descend lane WB. SHOPP ID 16938 $ 50,100,000 $ 57,872,622 2026-2030 CAL20838 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Colfax Narrows West Segment 1
In Placer County in the City of Colfax, from SR 174 IC to Long Ravine UP.

Construct truck climbing lane (WB). (PM 33.3/35.1) EA 3H620 $ 54,175,000 $ 72,859,352 2031-2035 CAL21115 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Eastbound I-80 at Auburn Ravine Road. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at Auburn Ravine Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21116 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Eastbound I-80 at Elm Avenue. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at Elm Avenue. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21106 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Eastbound I-80 at Newcastle Road. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at Newcastle Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21100 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Eastbound I-80 at northbound Sierra College Blvd. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at northbound Sierra College Blvd. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21109 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Eastbound I-80 at Ophir Road. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at Ophir Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21103 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Eastbound I-80 at Penryn Road. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at Penryn Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21108 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Eastbound I-80 at SR 193. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at SR 193. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21118 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Eastbound I-80 at the Bowman undercrossing. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 at the Bowman undercrossing. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21102 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Eastbound I-80 Horseshoe Bar Road. Install ramp meters. Eastbound I-80 Horseshoe Bar Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21012 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB Big Bend (Kingvale Grade Segment 1) On Placer 80 from Cisco Grove to Hampshire Rocks (PM R64.2/R66.3):

Pavement rehab. SHOPP ID 18436 $ 52,000,000 $ 33,755,499 2036-2040 CAL21011 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation EB Colfax 174 Grade
On Placer 80 from E. of Illnoistown OC to E. of SR 174 (PM 31.9/33.7): Truck climbing lane. SHOPP ID 18433 $ 13,762,000 $ 22,550,639 2036-2040 CAL21072 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation EB I-80 Applegate offramp chain on improvements Extend right turn lane of EB Applegate off-ramp to facilitate chain on screening $ 2,000,000 $ 2,560,169 2026-2030 CAL20846 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation EB Troy Grade - Kingvale Grade Segment 2 On Placer 80 from South Yuba River (Br # 19-105) to Kingvale (PM 67.7/69.2):

Truck climbing lane. SHOPP ID 18438 $ 17,470,000 $ 28,626,629 2036-2040 CAL21054 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Drainage Improvements
In Placer County from Sacramento County Line to 0.3 mile west of Gilardi Rd OC. $ 12,500,000 $ 14,858,572 2026-2030
CAL20969 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Applegate Pavement Rehabilititation In Placer County from 0.8 miles west of Auburn Ravine Road OC to Route 174/80 Seperation $ 53,000,000 $ 63,000,345 2026-2030
PLA25647 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-80 Atlantic/Eureka W/B On-ramp Widening
On I-80 in Roseville at the Atlantic Street/Eureka Road westbound on-ramp (PM 2.8): Install ramp meters and widen ramp for storage capacity. [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1031] $ 11,150,000 2020-2025
CAL21036 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Auburn Pavement Rehabilititation
In Placer County on Route 80 from Ophir Road to East Auburn OH (Br# 19- 0071) (PM 16.9/18.3). SHOPP ID 20400 $ 5,300,000 $ 6,457,535 2026-2030 CAL20719 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Bridge Rehab (G13 Contingency Project) In Placer and Nevada counties, I-80, at various locations (PM 28.7/R63.5) (G13 SHOPP Contingency Project) - Rehabilitate or replace bridges at six locations [#19-0038, #19-0112, #19-0113, #19-0114, #17-0023, #19-0118] (EFIS 0300020615 EA 2F570) (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW $ 48,385,000 2020-2025 CAL20721 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Colfax Culvert Rehabilitation
In and near Colfax, I-80, from west of Illinoistown Overcrossing to east of Cape Horn Undercrossing - Drainage system rehabilitation (PM 31.5/36.89) (EFIS 0300020600 EA 1E050) (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,730,000 2020-2025 CAL20720 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Culvert Rehab
Near Weimar, I-80, from west of Applegate Road to west of Weimar Cross Road (PM 25.9/28.5) - Drainage system rehabilitation (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,540,000 2020-2025
CAL21055 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Drainage Improvements A
In Placer County from 0.3 mile east of Drum Forebay OC (#19-114) to Troy UC (#19-106L/R): Drainage improvements. SHOPP ID 20567 $ 13,840,000 $ 13,158,751 2026-2030 CAL20869 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Drainage Improvements B
In Placer County, approx 0.3 mile west of Gilardi Rd OC to 0.3 mile west of Applegate Rd OC. $ 15,000,000 $ 18,732,945 2026-2030
CAL20974 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Drainage Rehabilitation From East of Gold Run OC to Beg Chain on Area. Drainage Rehab. $ 4,167,000 $ 4,832,442 2026-2030 CAL20770 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Gold Run Drainage Rehabilititation
Near Magra, from Secret Town Overcrossing to the Gold Run Safety Roadside Rest Area (SRRA). Rehabilitate drainage systems. $ 5,386,000 2020-2025 CAL20630
Project
Development Only PLA Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-80 Managed Lanes East of SR65 in both directions New managed lane facility - one each direction - on I-80 from SR65 east to SR49 in Auburn. (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes)(PM R4.160-17.374) $ 200,000,000 Post-2040 CAL21007 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Pavement Rehabilititation E
Near Loomis from King Road OC to Route 193 Interchange (PM 9.6/14.6).

SHOPP ID 18417 $ 18,200,000 $ 23,297,539 2026-2030
CAL21039 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Pavement Rehabilititation F
In Placer County on Route 80 from Drum Forebay OC to approx 0.8 mile west of Yuba Gap. SHOPP ID 20404 $ 22,000,000 $ 36,049,562 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21010 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
In Placer and Nevada Counties on Route 80 from Kingvale to Soda Springs. Add truck climbing lane.

In Placer and Nevada Counties on Route 80 from Kingvale to Soda Springs (PM

69.2/69.7): Add truck climbing lane. SHOPP ID 18427 $ 33,423,000 $ 42,784,266 2026-2030 CAL21229 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
In Placer County at Gold Run at the Gold Run Safety Roadside Rest Area
In Placer County at the Gold Run Safety Roadside Rest Area: Install back up generators. EA 2H480 $ 632,000 $ 414,997 2020-2025
CAL21000
Project
Development Only PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County in the city of Auburn, at the Bell Rd/I-80 Interchange. Construct capacity & operational improvements to interchange.

In Placer County in the city of Auburn, at the Bell Rd/I-80 Interchange.

Construct operational improvements to interchange. SHOPP ID 18145 $ 4,850,000 Post-2040 CAL20837
Project
Development Only PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County on Route 267 at Brockway Road and Pla 267.

Add through lanes to mainline, add dedicated left turn phasing and lanes to minor approaches.

In Placer County on Route 267 at Brockway Road and Pla 267. Add through lanes to mainline, add dedicated left turn phasing and lanes to minor approaches. SHOPP ID 17721 $ 2,160,000 Post-2040
CAL20992 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County on Route 49 approaching the Dry Creek Road intersection. Dual left turn lanes (NB).

In Placer County on Route 49 approaching the Dry Creek Road intersection.

Dual left turn lanes (NB). SHOPP ID 17687 $ 4,700,000 $ 6,016,397 2026-2030 CAL20991 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County on Route 49 approaching the Willow Creek Drive intersection. Dual left turn lanes (NB).

In Placer County on Route 49 approaching the Willow Creek Drive intersection.

Dual left turn lanes (NB). SHOPP ID 17686 $ 4,700,000 $ 6,016,397 2026-2030 CAL20989 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer county on route 49 at Bell Road intersections. NB Right Turn lanes.

In Placer county on route 49 at Bell Road intersections. NB Right Turn lanes.

SHOPP ID 17684 $ 2,300,000 $ 1,920,127 2026-2030
CAL20988 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer county on Route 49 at Elm Avenue/Harrison Street intersection. Intersection improvements/channelization.

In Placer county on Route 49 at Elm Avenue/Harrison Street intersection.

SHOPP ID 17683 $ 5,200,000 $ 6,656,440 2026-2030
CAL20990 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County on Route 49 at the Kemper Road intersection.

Kemper Rd channelization to improve SR49 operations.

In Placer County on Route 49 at the Kemper Road intersection. SHOPP ID 17685 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,920,127 2026-2030
CAL20987 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County on route 49 from the El Dorado County line to Borland Avenue. Turnouts, pullouts and shoulders.

In Placer County on route 49 from the El Dorado County line to Borland Avenue. Turnouts, pullouts and shoulders. SHOPP ID 17682 $ 5,700,000 $ 7,296,482 2026-2030 CAL20986
Project
Development Only PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County on Route 80 in the City of Auburn from Ophir Rd to Elm Ave. Improve short weave.

In Placer County on Route 80 in the City of Auburn from Ophir Rd to Elm Ave (PM 16.86/17.75): Improve short weave. SHOPP ID 17681 $ 7,000,000 Post-2040 CAL20981
Project
Development Only PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Placer County, on Route 174 in Colfax, at South Auburn St and Central Street. Intersection Improvements (possible roundabout)
In Placer County, on Route 174 in Colfax, at South Auburn St and Central Street: Turn lane. SHOPP ID 17532 $ 3,000,000 Post-2040 CAL20845 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Monte Vista Truck Climbing
In Placer County on I-80 from Saw Mill OC to 0.3 mile east of Drum Forebay OC (PM 42.7/49.3): Pavement preservation. EA 3H610 $ 76,860,000 2020-2025 CAL21094 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Northbound SR 65 at Blue Oaks Blvd. Install ramp meters. Northbound SR 65 at Blue Oaks Blvd. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 440,683 2026-2030 CAL21093 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Northbound SR 65 at Pleasant Grove Blvd. Install ramp meters. Northbound SR 65 at Pleasant Grove Blvd. Install ramp meters. $ 900,000 $ 1,043,724 2026-2030 CAL21097 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Northbound SR 65 at Twelve Bridges Drive. Install ramp
meters. Northbound SR 65 at Twelve Bridges Drive. Install ramp meters. $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040 CAL21284 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Overhead Sign Structure Replacement On Routes 20 and 49 in Nevada County and on Route 80 in Placer County at various locations. Overhead sign structure replacement. EA 1H250 $ 2,555,000 $ 2,963,017 2026-2030 CAL20609 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Ramp Meters
Installation of Ramp Meters: Various Locations in Placer, Sacramento, and Yolo Counties. Rocklin Rd., SB and NB Sierra College Blvd. $ 4,800,000 $ 7,865,359 2036-2040 CAL21230 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Roseville Mtce Station Rebuild crewrooms, offices and EQ barn $ 999,000 $ 1,636,978 2036-2040 CAL20633
Project
Development Only PLA Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Route 65 Lincoln Bypass Phase 2B
In Placer County, SR65: Right-of-way acquisition & construct a 4-lane expressway from North Ingram Slough to Sheridan. $ 55,000,000 Post-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21098 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Southbound SR 65 at eastbound Ferrari Ranch Road. Install ramp meters. Southbound SR 65 at eastbound Ferrari Ranch Road. Install ramp meters. $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040 CAL21095 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Southbound SR 65 at Twelve Bridges Drive. Install ramp meters. Southbound SR 65 at Twelve Bridges Drive. Install ramp meters. $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040 CAL20937 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 193 Widen Shoulders and Overlay
In Placer County on SR 193 betwen 3.5 miles east of Lincoln and 0.1 miles east of Clark Tunnel Road (PM 4.1/4.6): Widen shoulders and overlay. EA 1H830 $ 7,708,000 $ 8,938,917 2026-2030 CAL21045 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 267 Pavement Rehabilitation
In Placer County on Route 267 from approx. 0.4 mile east of Northstar Dr to Jct St 28 (PM 4.1/9.9). SHOPP ID 20497 $ 8,905,000 $ 10,849,878 2026-2030 CAL20638 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SR 267 SB Truck Climbing Lane
In Placer County on Rte 267 from Northstar Drive to Brockway Summit: Extend SB Truck climbing lane (PM 3.76/PM 6.67). SHOPP ID 17533 $ 19,500,000 $ 28,947,860 2036-2040 CAL20541 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 49 Pavement Rehab
In Auburn, SR 49, from 0.1 mile south of Routes 49/80 separation to 0.1 mile north of Dry Creek Road. HMA overlay, Class II bike lanes, two new traffic signals. (PM 3.1/7.5) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0992] [EFIS 0300020616 EA 2F340] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, and CON). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 39,905,000 2020-2025 CAL20728 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SR 49 Realignment A
In Auburn, from 0.3 mile south of Lincoln Way/Borland Avenue to Lincoln Way/Borland Avenue (PM 2.2/2.4) -Realign Roadway. Construct RSP or concrete retaining structure. Replace culverts. (EA 1H240) [CTIPS ID 107-0000- 1063] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 5,364,000 2020-2025 CAL20849 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 49 Resident Mechanic Shop Auburn Resident Mechanic SHOPP ID 18468 $ 2,600,000 $ 3,328,220 2026-2030 CAL21227 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SR 49 Safety Improvements
In Placer County near Auburn from 0.3 mile south of Lorenson Road/Florence Lane to 0.3 mile north of Lone Star Road [PM R8.7/R10.6]: Construct concrete median barrier and two roundabouts. [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1222] $ 26,340,000 2020-2025 CAL20768 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 65 Advance Mitigation
Near Lincoln, on McCourtney Road between Riosa Road and Kilaga Springs Road at the Coon Creek Conservation (C4) Ranch - Advance mitigation construction (4 acres) for future SHOPP projects expected to impact wetland, riparian and other waters [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1113] (Toll Credits) (Total Project Cost $2,639,000). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON. EA 1H530 $ 2,639,000 2026-2030 CAL20729 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 65 Galleria Blvd. Ramp Meters
In Placer County on SR 65, at Galleria Blvd. - Install ramp meters [CTIPS ID 107- 0000-1064] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) [EA 0F352, PPNO 6913A] [second child project of parent EA 0F350; first child is EA 0F351, PPNO 6913]. Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 4,950,000 2020-2025
CAL20823 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SR 65 ICM Implement ICM strategies on the SR 65 corridor (Non-capacity) $ 45,000,000 $ 66,802,753 2036-2040 CAL20756 Programmed PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation SR 89 Slope Mesh Drapery
In Placer County, on SR 89, from 0.2 mile south of Goose Meadows Campground to 0.5 mile south of Montreal Road (PM 17.2/18.3): Place slope mesh drapery (201.150 SHOPP Roadway Protective Betterments 17/18 FY Minor A). Toll Credits for CON $ 1,422,000 2020-2025
CAL21285 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SR-267 North Lake Tahoe. Install ped signal. SR-267 North Lake Tahoe. Install ped signal. $ 3,600,000 $ 4,608,304 2026-2030 CAL20637 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS System Management/Traffic Operations System on SR49 Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable message signs, and other system management infrastructure in Placer County. (PM 3.2/11.372) $ 4,000,000 $ 5,938,022 2036-2040 CAL21231 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Tahoe City Mtce Station Install wash facility $ 975,000 $ 1,597,651 2036-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21013 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation WB Eagle Lake Grade
On Placer 80 from East of SR 20 to Yuba Pass Summit (PM 58.2/60.8):

Pavement rehab. SHOPP ID 18437 $ 31,350,000 $ 41,563,506 2036-2040 CAL21114 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Auburn Ravine Road. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Auburn Ravine Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21119 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Bell Road. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Bell Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21112 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Elm Avenue. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Elm Avenue. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21101 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Horseshoe Bar Road. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Horseshoe Bar Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21110 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Nevada St. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Nevada St. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21105 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Newcastle Road. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Newcastle Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21104 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Penryn Road. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Penryn Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21113 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at Russel Road. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at Russel Road. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21107 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at SR 193. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at SR 193. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21111 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at SR 49. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at SR 49. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 486,432 2026-2030 CAL21099 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Westbound I-80 at SR 65. Install connector meter Westbound I-80 at SR 65. Install connector meter $ 1,940,000 $ 2,741,169 2031-2035 CAL21117 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Westbound I-80 at the Bowman undercrossing. Install ramp meters. Westbound I-80 at the Bowman undercrossing. Install ramp meters. $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21215 Planned PLA Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Whitmore Sand house Repair sand house $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 2020-2025 CAL20639 Planned PLA
Caltrans Division
of Rail
E- Transit Capital
(Major) Auburn to Donner Summit Track Improvements Phases 1 & 2 Upgrade Donner Pass Summit (UP Line) double track: including addition of crossovers, notching of tunnels, reactivation &
replacement of second mainline track between Auburn & Reno, Nevada $ 86,000,000 $ 140,921,014 2036-2040 CAL20640
Project
Development Only PLA
Caltrans Division
of Rail
E- Transit Capital
(Major) UP Over/Under Crossing Build over/undercrossing at Union Pacific crossing of Sierra College Boulevard $ 30,000,000 Post-2040 VAR56134 Planned PLA
Capitol Corridor
JPA F- Transit O&M (Rail) Capitol Corridor Operations & Maintenance Capitol Corridor operations & equipment maintenance, funded by the State of California/ Caltrans Division of Rail. (Total Cost: $728,000,000) $ 58,181,760 $ 95,337,588 2036-2040 VAR56135
Project
Development Only PLA
Capitol Corridor
JPA
E- Transit Capital
(Minor) Capitol Corridor Rail Replacement & Expansion
Lump-sum of capital improvements between Colfax & Davis (Total Cost:
$120,720,000) $ 9,647,942 Post-2040
PLA25353 Programmed PLA City of Auburn
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Auburn Multi Modal Station - Rail Platform Extension At the existing Auburn Multi Modal Station: Obtain right-of-way and install rail platform extension . (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.93 ROG, 1.18 NOx, 0.43 PM10) $ 1,416,480 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25821 Planned PLA City of Auburn
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance, Auburn
Estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($ 500,000 annually) $ 10,000,000 $ 16,386,164 2036-2040 PLA25146 Planned PLA City of Colfax
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Grass Valley St./UPRR Overcrossing
Rail Crossing Project; above-grade crossing of UP Tracks from east side (S Auburn)to west side (Main) $ 14,700,000 $ 24,087,662 2036-2040 PLA20420 Planned PLA City of Colfax
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80/Canyon Wy. Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements at Canyon Wy. / I-80 Overpass, to include signalization, intersection realignment and striping. $ 600,000 $ 695,816 2026-2030 PLA25591 Planned PLA City of Colfax
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-80/SR174 Interchange Improvements (Construction funds) Reconstruct I-80/SR 174 Interchange $ 25,000,000 $ 40,965,411 2036-2040 PLA25490 Planned PLA City of Colfax
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-80/SR174 Road Widening and Signal Improvements Roadway Operational Improvements at Hwy. 174 & I-80, to include new signal and intersection widening with sidewalks and curb ramps $ 550,000 $ 577,844 2020-2025 PLA25466 Planned PLA City of Colfax
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Main and Grass Valley Signal Improvements Design and construction of a new traffic signal and turn-lane at the intersection of Main Street and Grass Valley Street. (Emission reductions: ROG .02 kg/day; NOx .01 kg/day) $ 450,000 $ 534,909 2026-2030 PLA25237 Planned PLA City of Colfax A- Bike & Ped S Auburn Street Bicycle Improvements Add bike routes lanes on both sides of South Auburn Street from Mink Creek to Grass Valley UP Tracks. $ 50,000 $ 52,531 2020-2025
PLA25676 Programmed PLA City of Colfax
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation S. Auburn St. & I-80 Roundabout
In Colfax: At the intersection of S. Auburn St. and Westbound Interstate 80 on/off-ramps; construct a four-leg, one-lane roundabout. (Emission benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.05, NOx 0.05, PM2.5 0.01). Toll Credits for ENG $ 2,600,000 2020-2025 PLA25235 Planned PLA City of Colfax
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation S. Auburn/Central/Hwy.174 Intersection Improvements Intersection improvements on S. Auburn St. at Central Ave./Hwy. 174 intersection, to include widening, signalization, and pedestrian improvements. $ 700,000 $ 811,785 2026-2030 PLA25822 Planned PLA City of Colfax
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance, Colfax
Estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, snow removal, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($ 135,000 annually) $ 2,700,000 $ 4,424,264 2036-2040 PLA18650
Project
Development Only PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Aviation Blvd. Extension north of Venture
Widen Aviation Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Venture Dr. to terminus 0.5 miles north of Venture Dr. $ 3,150,192 Post-2040
PLA25687 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity East Joiner Parkway Overcrossing
In Lincoln: Widen East Joiner Parkway overcrossing from 4 to 6 lanes from Ferrari Ranch Road to Sterling Parkway $ 10,000,000 2020-2025 PLA25771 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity East Joiner Parkway Widening C
Widen East Joiner Parkway from 4 to 6 lanes from Twelve Bridges Dr. to Bella Breeze. $ 2,519,661 $ 2,922,034 2026-2030
PLA25688 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity East Joiner Parkway Widening Phase 1
In Lincoln: Widen East Joiner Parkway from 2 to 4 lanes from Twelve Bridges Drive to Rocklin City Limits $ 9,290,000 2020-2025
PLA25689 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity East Joiner Parkway Widening Phase 2
In Lincoln: Widen East Joiner Parkway from 2 to 4 lanes from Twelve Bridges Drive to Del Webb Blvd north. $ 8,992,396 2026-2030
PLA25747 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Ferrari Ranch Rd
Widen Ferrari Ranch Road from Caledon Circle East to SR-65 Interchange, lane reconfiguration for one additional lane $ 1,961,358 $ 2,164,972 2020-2025 PLA25746 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Ferrari Ranch Rd Phase II Interchange Ferrari Ranch Road interchange improvements $ 4,241,250 $ 5,167,551 2026-2030 PLA25739 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Ferrari Ranch Rd Village 7 Bridge Construct 4 lane bridge on Ferrari Ranch Road across Inghram Slough $ 3,625,000 $ 4,001,322 2020-2025 PLA25169 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Ferrari Ranch Road
Widen Ferrari Ranch Road from 2 to 4 lanes from 0.2 miles west of Ingram Pkwy to 0.1 miles north of SR-193 $ 5,412,211 $ 5,686,204 2020-2025 PLA25467 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Ferrari Ranch Road Extension
Extend Ferrari Ranch Road from Caledon Circle West to Moore Road (Village 7 boundary). $ 3,255,522 $ 3,420,333 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25769 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Fiddyment Road Expansion Widen Fiddyment Road to 6 lanes from Moore Road to Athens Ave $ 24,990,495 $ 36,193,688 2031-2035 PLA25736 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Fiddyment Road Orchard Creek Bridge Construct 6 lane bridge on Fiddyment Road across Orchard Creek $ 4,350,000 $ 5,044,666 2026-2030 PLA25668 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Joiner Parkway Repaving Project
In Lincoln; from Moore Road to Venture Drive on Joiner Parkway. Project will consist of AC overlay, slurry seal, base repairs, ADA ramps and striping. $ 3,071,654 2020-2025 PLA25164 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Joiner Pkwy. Widen: 6 lanes from Ferrari Ranch Rd. to Moore Rd. $ 7,001,921 $ 11,473,463 2036-2040 PLA25677 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Lincoln Blvd Streetscape Improvement Project Phase 4 The overall goal of the Lincoln Boulevard Streetscape Improvement Project is to provide for a more pedestrian, bicycle, and neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEV) friendly environment along and across the main street through the City.

This will be accomplished by closing gaps between and improving existing sidewalks, upgrading and shortening pedestrian crossings with curb bulb outs and ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, and installing combined Class 2 bike lanes and NEV lanes along Lincoln Boulevard. This project will continue the streetscape improvements to construct improved sidewalks, curb bulb outs, curb ramps, and traffic signal improvements on Lincoln Boulevard between 1st Street and 2nd Street and at the intersections of Lincoln Boulevard at 7th Street. $ 1,566,000 2020-2025
PLA25775 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Lincoln Blvd Widening Over Auburn Ravine Lincoln Blvd at Auburn Ravine; Replace 2-lane bridge with a 4-lane bridge $ 9,880,000 $ 12,037,821 2026-2030 PLA18710 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Lincoln Blvd. Widening A
Widen Lincoln Blvd. (formerly Industrial Blvd.) from 2 to 4 lanes from SR-65 to Twelve Bridges Dr. $ 4,233,719 $ 6,284,980 2036-2040
PLA25645 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln A- Bike & Ped Lincoln Boulevard Streetscape Improvements Project Phase 3 Lincoln Boulevard for a half mile and sections of First Street, Third Street, Fifth Street, Sixth Street and Seventh Street: construct streetscape improvements, including improved sidewalks and 0.3 miles of NEV/Bike Lanes. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.08 ROG, 0.05 NOx, 0.02 PM2.5, 0.02 PM10) (Toll credits for PE & CON). Toll Credits for ENG, CON $ 1,469,458 2020-2025 PLA25732 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Mavis Road A
Construct New Road: 4 lanes, Mavis Road from Dowd Rd to 1.0 miles east of Dowd Rd $ 2,809,772 $ 4,069,388 2031-2035
PLA25733 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Mavis Road B
Construct New Road: 6 lanes, Mavis Road from 1.0 miles east of Dowd Rd to existing Nelson Ln $ 7,954,197 $ 8,779,945 2020-2025
PLA25705 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity McBean Drive Widening - Phase 1 Widen McBean Drive to four lanes from Ferrari Ranch to Oak Tree Lane $ 9,249,021 $ 9,717,253 2020-2025 PLA25714 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity McBean Drive Widening - Phase 2
Widen McBean Drive to four lanes from Oak Tree Lane to N/S Connector Loop (approximately 2900 feet east of Oak Tree Lane) $ 5,729,091 $ 6,980,341 2026-2030 PLA25745 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity McBean Drive Widening - Phase 3
Widen McBean Drive to four lanes from N/S Connector Loop (approximately 2900 feet east of Oak Tree Lane) to Sierra College Blvd $ 2,296,256 $ 3,325,663 2031-2035 PLA25540 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation McBean Park Bridge Rehabilitation
McBean Park Dr. over Auburn Ravine, east of East Ave.: Rehabilitate existing 2 lane bridge. No added lane capacity. $ 14,472,000 2020-2025 PLA25652 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity McBean Park Drive Widening Over Auburn Ravine
From East Ave. to Ferrari Ranch Rd.: Replace 2-lane bridge with a 4-lane bridge, including the McBean Park Bridge at Auburn Ravine. $ 11,818,131 2020-2025 PLA25737 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Moore Road Expansion
Widen Moore Road to 4 lanes from Fiddyment Road to 0.5 miles east of existing Nelson Lane $ 4,493,949 $ 7,363,859 2036-2040
PLA25768 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Nelson Lane Auburn Ravine Bridge Construct 6 lane bridge on Nelson Lane across Auburn Ravine $ 8,700,000 $ 10,089,333 2026-2030 PLA25595 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Nelson Lane Extension
Road Realignment and Widening: 6 lanes, Nelson Lane from Rockwell Ln to Moore Rd $ 12,114,449 $ 13,372,085 2020-2025
PLA25734 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Nelson Lane Interchange Interchange at Nelson Lane and SR-65 $ 40,600,000 $ 51,971,432 2026-2030

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25735 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Nelson Lane Widening Widen Nelson Lane to 6 lanes from Nicolaus Road to Rockwell Lane $ 6,772,102 $ 9,808,023 2031-2035 PLA15970 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Nicolaus Rd. Widen Nicolaus Rd. 1 lane from Airport Rd. to Aviation Blvd. $ 3,999,142 $ 5,791,950 2031-2035 PLA25305 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Oak Tree Extension
Construct New Road: Oak Tree Lane, 4 lanes between McBean Park Dr. and Ferrari Ranch Road. $ 8,471,567 $ 8,900,440 2020-2025
PLA25743 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Oak Tree Extension Phase 2
Construct New Road: Oak Tree Lane, 4 lanes between Virginiatown Rd. and Fox Ln $ 1,332,543 $ 1,978,168 2036-2040
PLA25742 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Oak Tree Lane Auburn Ravine Bridge
Construct 4 lane bridge on Oak Tree Lane across Auburn Ravine (Ferrari Ranch Road to Virginiatown Road) $ 7,975,000 $ 9,716,763 2026-2030 PLA25773 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Oak Tree Lane Southern Widening
Widen 1 lane on Oak Tree Ln. from McBean Park Dr. to 0.35 miles south of McBean Park Dr $ 754,835 $ 754,835 2020-2025
PLA25823 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance, Lincoln
Estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($ 1,400,000 annually) $ 28,000,000 $ 45,881,260 2036-2040 PLA25646 Programmed PLA City of Lincoln
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing
On 1st (First) Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street: Rehabilitate and resurface roadway. Various drainage, ADA, and striping improvements will also be constructed as part of the project. (Toll credits for CON). Toll Credits for CON $ 1,671,954 2020-2025
PLA19020 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Twelve Bridges Dr. Widening A
Widen Twelve Bridges Dr.from 2 to 4 lanes from Lincoln Blvd. to west side of SR-65 Interchange (approx. 0.15 miles) $ 1,981,120 $ 2,354,929 2026-2030 PLA20760 Planned PLA City of Lincoln
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Venture Drive Rehabilitation Rehabilitate Venture Drive from McClain Drive to Aviation Blvd. $ 1,430,909 $ 1,579,456 2020-2025 PLA19260 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Dominguez Road
In Rocklin, Dominguez Road: extend with 2 lanes from Granite Drive to Sierra College Boulevard, including new bridge over I-80. $ 11,000,000 $ 16,329,562 2036-2040 PLA25722 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Monument Springs 2-lane extension and 2-lane bridge $ 2,147,226 $ 2,255,929 2020-2025 PLA25635 Programmed PLA City of Rocklin
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Pacific St at Rocklin Road Roundabout
At Rocklin Rd/Pacific St., replace existing traffic signal intersection with a two lane roundabout : (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON).(Emission Benefits kg/day:

ROG 0.26; NOx 0.21; PM2.5 0.01).. Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 2,707,607 2020-2025 PLA25272 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Pacific St. Widen: 6 lanes from SW of Sunset Blvd. to NE of Sunset Blvd. $ 240,000 $ 347,592 2031-2035 PLA25718 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Pacific Street Widen Pacific street to 4 lanes from Sierra Meadows to Loomis Town Limits $ 5,251,927 $ 8,605,894 2036-2040 PLA25712 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Rocklin Rd. & Pacific Ave.

On Rocklin Rd. & Pacific Avenue construct ITS Master Plan downtown improvements. $ 4,000,000 $ 4,202,500 2020-2025
PLA25273 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Rocklin Road Widening
Widen Rocklin Road from 2 to 4 lanes from Loomis town limits to east of Sierra College Boulevard. $ 372,266 $ 421,185 2020-2025
PLA19401 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Rocklin Road Widening A
In Rocklin, Rocklin Road from Aguilar Road / Eastbound I-80 on-ramps to Sierra College Blvd: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $ 1,534,000 $ 2,221,689 2031-2035 PLA25345 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Rocklin Road/I-80 Interchange
In Rocklin: from Rocklin Rd. onto both WB and EB I-80; construct roundabouts or other improvements at ramp EB/WB ramp terminus. $ 26,150,000 $ 29,586,325 2020-2025 PLA15400 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Widening D
In Rocklin, widen Sierra College Boulevard from 4 to 6 lanes from I-80 to Aguliar Tributary. $ 3,800,000 $ 5,503,533 2031-2035
PLA20460 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Widening E
In Rocklin, Sierra College Boulevard from Aguilar Tributary to Nightwatch:
widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $ 2,750,000 $ 3,982,820 2031-2035 PLA25721 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Boulevard Widen Sierra College Blvd. to 6 lanes from I-80 to south of Taylor Rd. $ 3,565,550 $ 5,163,980 2031-2035

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25824 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance, Rocklin
Estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($ 5,400,000 annually) $ 108,000,000 $ 176,970,576 2036-2040 PLA17820 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Sunset Blvd. & Sierra College Blvd.

On Sunset Blvd. & Sierra College Blvd. construct ITS Master Plan improvements. $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 2020-2025
PLA25156 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sunset Blvd. Widening B
Sunset Boulevard: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from north bound SR 65 ramp to West Stanford Ranch Road. $ 1,100,000 $ 1,593,128 2031-2035 PLA15620 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sunset Boulevard
Widen Sunset Boulevard from 4 to 6 lanes, from Standford Ranch Road to Pacific Street, inlcuding Bridge of UPRR. $ 4,177,406 $ 6,845,166 2036-2040 PLA25151 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity West Oaks Boulevard
West Oaks Boulevard: Construct new 4-lane extension from terminus to 4-lane portion to Whitney Ranch Parkway. $ 3,500,000 $ 3,677,188 2020-2025 PLA19290 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Whitney Ranch Parkway
Whitney Ranch Parkway, construct new 4-lane facility from east of Wildcat Blvd. to Whitney Oaks Dr. $ 12,428,000 $ 14,772,987 2026-2030 PLA25751 Planned PLA City of Rocklin
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Whitney Ranch Parkway Widening
Widen Whitney Ranch Parkway from 2 to 6 lanes from Northbound SR 65 Ramp to East of Wildcat Blvd. $ 3,083,809 $ 3,489,047 2020-2025 PLA19810
Project
Development Only PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Atkinson St./PFE Rd. Widening
In Roseville, Atkinson St./PFE Rd.: widen from two to four lanes from Foothills Blvd to just south of Dry Creek, including connector road from Foothills to Atkinson (mirror image of existing Denio Loop connector on N/E side of Foothills) and signal removal. $ 7,000,000 Post-2040
PLA25763 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Atlantic/Vernon Roundabout construct roundabout at intersection of Atlantic Street and Vernon Street $ 4,000,000 $ 4,307,563 2020-2025 PLA15660 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Baseline Rd. Widening
In Roseville, Baseline Rd., from Brady Lane to Fiddyment Road: widen from 3 to 4 lanes. $ 6,106,889 2020-2025
PLA15100 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Baseline Road
In Roseville, Baseline Road from Fiddyment Road to Sierra Vista Western edge west of Watt Avenue: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $ 7,852,055 2020-2025 PLA25758 Planned PLA City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Bicycle Master Plan Class I Trail Buildout Construct trails as described in the City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan and Specific Plan Bicycle Master Plans $ 45,000,000 $ 73,737,740 2036-2040 PLA25681 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks Blvd Bridge Widening
In Roseville, on Blue Oaks Blvd between Washington Blvd and Foothills Boulevard, widen from 4 to 8 lanes, including Bridge over Industrial Ave./UPRR tracks. $ 23,000,000 2020-2025
PLA25528 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks Blvd Extension - Phase 1
In Roseville, Extend 2 lanes of Blue Oaks Blvd from Hayden Parkway to Westside Dr., Including south half of a 6-lane bridge over Kaseberg Creek. $ 6,000,000 2020-2025 PLA25539 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks Blvd. Extension Phase 2
In Roseville, Blue Oaks Blvd., from Westside Dr. to Santucci Blvd. (formerly Watt Ave.), extend 2 lanes. $ 6,350,000 2026-2030
PLA25752 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks over UPRR Bridge Widening
Construct 4 lane bridge over UPRR tracks and Industrial Ave. on westbound Blue Oaks Blvd. between Foothills Blvd. and Washington Blvd to widen existing 4 lane roadway to 8 lanes $ 23,000,000 $ 25,387,696 2020-2025 PLA25707 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks west widening, Santucci to Westbrook North of Pleasant Grove Blvd., construct 4 lanes to widen Blue Oaks to 6 Lane Roadway from Santucci Blvd. to Westbrook Blvd. (first two lanes will be constructed with Blue Oaks Blvd. Extension Phase 2). $ 5,700,000 $ 7,296,482 2026-2030 PLA25753 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks west widening, Westbrook to Westpark North of Pleasant Grove Blvd., 4 lanes to widen Blue Oaks to construct 6 Lane Roadway from Westbrook Blvd. to Westpark Blvd. $ 1,600,000 $ 2,048,135 2026-2030 PLA25754 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks west widening, Westpark to Fiddyment North of Pleasant Grove Blvd., 4 lanes to widen Blue Oaks to construct 6 Lane Roadway from Westpark Blvd. to Fiddyment Rd. $ 3,000,000 $ 3,840,254 2026-2030 PLA25710 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Blue Oaks west widening, Woodcreek Oaks to Foothills North of Pleasant Grove Blvd., construct 1 additional westbound lane to widen Blue Oaks to a construct 8 Lane Roadway from Woodcreek Oaks Blvd to Foothills Blvd $ 500,000 $ 640,042 2026-2030
PLA19910 Programmed PLA City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Dry Creek Greenway Trail In Roseville, along Dry Creek, Cirby Creek and Linda Creek, construct class 1 bike trail. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.09 ROG, 0.07 NOx, 0.03 PM2.5) $ 11,790,629 2020-2025 PLA25318 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Dry Creek Greenway West Trail
Bikeway Facilities: from Darling Wy. to western Roseville City limits along Dry Creek. $ 4,000,000 $ 4,873,612 2026-2030

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25666 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Fleet Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of ten (10) buses to extend the useful life of the vehicles. (Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits for CON). Toll Credits for CON $ 3,000,000 2020-2025
PLA25716 Planned PLA City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Mahany Park Trail Construct approximately 1 .1 miles of Class I trail through Open Space behind Mahany Park to Fiddyment Road. $ 2,000,000 $ 2,153,781 2020-2025 PLA25527 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Pleasant Grove Blvd. Extension
In Roseville, extend 4 lanes of Pleasant Grove from 1500 feet west of Market St to Santucci Blvd (Watt Ave). $ 5,300,000 2020-2025
PLA15760 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Pleasant Grove Blvd. Widening
In Roseville, from Foothills Blvd to Wood Creek Oaks, widen Pleasant Grove Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes. $ 4,200,000 $ 4,751,914 2020-2025 PLA25713 Planned PLA City of Roseville
E- Transit Capital
(Minor) Purchase 3 dial-a-ride buses
In Roseville, consistent with the City of Roseville 2011 Short Range Transit Plan, purchase 3 dial-a-ride buses to replace existing buses on our local dial-aride fleet. $ 450,000 $ 450,000 2020-2025 PLA25756 Planned PLA City of Roseville
E- Transit Capital
(Minor) Purchase 3 Local Fixed Route Buses
In Roseville, consistent with the City of Roseville 2011 Short Range Transit Plan, purchase 3 buses to replace existing buses used on our local fixed route transit system. $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 2020-2025
PLA25715 Planned PLA City of Roseville
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Purchase 8 dial-a-ride buses
In Roseville, consistent with the City of Roseville 2011 Short Range Transit Plan, purchase 8 dial-a-ride buses to replace existing buses on our local dial-aride fleet. $ 1,200,000 $ 1,230,000 2020-2025 PLA25682 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Roseville Parkway Extension
In Roseville, extend 4-lane Roseville Parkway approx. 3,750' from Washington Blvd. to Foothills Blvd., including new 4-lane bridge over Industrial Ave./UPRR tracks $ 22,500,000 2020-2025
PLA25680 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Roseville Parkway Widening
In Roseville, on Roseville Parkway, widen from 6 to 8 lanes from just east of Creekside Ridge Drive to Gibson Drive (E). $ 11,200,000 2020-2025 PLA25762 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Roseville Parkway Widening at Galleria
Construct additional eastbound and westbound through lanes on Galleria Blvd. between Creekside Ridge Dr. and Gibson Drive and add an additional left turn lane from SW bound Pleasant Grove Blvd. onto SE bound Roseville Parkway $ 8,000,000 $ 8,615,125 2020-2025 PLA15850 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Roseville Road Widening
Widen Roseville Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes Between Cirby Way and southern city limit. $ 2,500,000 2020-2025
PLA25378 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Santucci Blvd. Extension
City of Roseville, Santucci Blvd. (North Watt Ave.): Extend four lanes from Vista Grande Blvd.to Blue Oaks Boulevard. $ 6,500,000 2020-2025 PLA25570 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Santucci Boulevard South
In Roseville, Santucci Boulevard South (Watt Ave.) from Baseline Road north to Vista Grande Boulevard: Construct 4-lane road. $ 1,000,000 2020-2025 PLA15600
Project
Development Only PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Blvd Widening
Sierra College Blvd from Sacramento County line to Olympus Dr.: widen to 6 lanes. $ 5,000,000 Post-2040
PLA25825 Planned PLA City of Roseville
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance, Roseville
Estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($ 14,400,000 annually) $ 288,000,000 $ 471,921,535 2036-2040 PLA15911 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Taylor Rd. Operational Improvments B
In Roseville; from just N/O E. Roseville Parkway to City Limits, widen Taylor Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes. $ 17,200,000 $ 25,533,497 2036-2040
PLA25538 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Vista Grande Arterial
In Roseville, from Fiddyment Rd west to Westbrook Blvd, construct new 4-lane arterial. $ 2,500,000 2020-2025
PLA25820 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Vista Grande Arterial B
In Roseville, from Westbrook Blvd, west to Sierra Vista Specific Plan western boundary, construct new 4-lane arterial including a bridge over Curry Creek. $ 5,500,000 $ 6,222,745 2020-2025 PLA25673 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Washington Bl/All America City Bl Roundabout In Roseville, at the intersection of Washington Blvd/All America City Blvd., design and construct a 2-lane roundabout.. Toll Credits for CON $ 2,438,000 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25501 Programmed PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Washington Blvd/Andora Undercrossing Improvement Project In Roseville, widen Washington Blvd from 2 to 4 lanes, including widening the Andora Underpass under the UPRR tracks, between Sawtell Rd and just south of Pleasant Grove Blvd. and construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements adjacent to roadway. (CMAQ funds are for bicycle and pedestrian improvements only. Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.9 ROG, 0.51 NOx, 0.16 PM10) $ 32,612,000 2020-2025
PLA25483 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Westbrook Blvd. A
Construct 4 New lanes of the ultimate 6-lane Road: west of Fiddyment Road between Baseline and Pleasant Grove in proposed new Sierra Vista Specific Plan. $ 7,500,000 $ 8,485,562 2020-2025
PLA25481 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Westbrook Blvd. B
Construct New Road: west of Fiddyment and north of Blue Oaks in proposed new Creekview Specific Plan. $ 6,000,000 $ 8,907,034 2036-2040 PLA25755 Planned PLA City of Roseville
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Westbrook Blvd. between Blue Oaks and Pleasant Grove.

Construct 4 lane of ultimate 6-lane roadway between Blue Oaks Blvd. and Pleasant Grove Blvd. $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 2020-2025
PLA25626 Planned PLA PCTPA
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS At-Grade Railroad Crossings At-Grade Railroad Crossings, including quiet zones throughout County $ 500,000,000 $ 819,308,220 2036-2040 PLA25588 Planned PLA PCTPA A- Bike & Ped Bicycle Facilities Construct various bicycle facilities to implement the Regional Bicycle Master Plan and Local Bicycle Master Plans as amended. $ 40,000,000 $ 65,544,658 2036-2040 PLA25632 Planned PLA PCTPA
E- Transit Capital
(Vehicles) Bus Replacement
Lump-sum for bus vehicles for fiscal years 2019-2036; does not account for expansion of service. Placer County operators only. $ 63,153,000 $ 103,483,544 2036-2040 PLA25587 Planned PLA PCTPA A- Bike & Ped Complete Street & Safe Routes to School Improvements Enhance pedestrian/bicycle and landscaping along approximately 40 miles of roadway and construct Safe Routes to School improvements to implement local plans. $ 52,000,000 $ 85,208,055 2036-2040
PLA25586 Planned PLA PCTPA
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Electric Vehicle Charging and Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Develop and construct an electric vehicle charging and alternative fuels infrastructure. $ 20,000,000 $ 32,772,329 2036-2040
PLA25670 Programmed PLA PCTPA A- Bike & Ped Highway 49 Sidewalk Gap Closure Along SR 49 from I-80 to Dry Creek Road In the City of Auburn and County of Placer construct sidewalks and ADA curb ramps at various locations (Emissions Benefit in kg/day: ROG 0.06, NOx 0.04, PM2.5 0.01). Toll Credits for PE and ROW.. Toll Credits for ENG, ROW $ 13,800,000 2020-2025
PLA25576 Programmed PLA PCTPA
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-80 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane and I-80 Westbound 5th Lane In Roseville and Rocklin: Between SR 65 and Rocklin Rd. on eastbound I-80, and east of Douglas Blvd. to west of Riverside Ave. on westbound I-80; Construct eastbound I-80 auxiliary lane, including two-lane off-ramp to Rocklin Rd, and construct 5th lane on westbound I-80, including reducing Douglas Boulevard off-ramp from 2-lanes to 1-lane. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, and CON). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 18,655,000 2020-2025 PLA25440 Programmed PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 1
In Placer County: Between I-80 and Pleasant Grove Boulevard; Reconfigure I80/SR 65 interchange to add auxiliary lane on northbound SR 65 from I-80 westbound on-ramp to Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road off-ramp, widen inside northbound SR 65 from 2 to 3 lanes from south of Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road off-ramp to Pleasant Grove Boulevard offramp, including widening Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road northbound off-ramp and on-ramp, and southbound on-ramp (PA&ED, PS&E, ROW, and CON to be matched with Toll Credits). SHOPP funding (EA 03-0H260) for auxiliary lane on northbound SR 65 between I-80 and Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road. SHOPP funding (EA 03-0F352) for southbound on-ramp from Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road. $ 53,283,200 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25649 Programmed PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 2
In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; Reconfigure I80/SR 65 interchange to widen southbound to eastbound ramp from 1 to 2 lanes, replace existing eastbound to northbound loop ramp with a new 3 lane direct flyover ramp (including full middle structure for East Roseville Viaduct), construct collector-distributor roadway parallel to eastbound I-80 between Eureka Road off-ramp and SR 65, and widen Taylor Road from 2 to 4 lanes between Roseville Parkway and Pacific Street. $ 250,000,000 2026-2030 PLA25602 Planned PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 3
In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; Reconfigure I80/SR 65 interchange to widen the southbound to westbound ramp from 2 to 3 lanes and the westbound to northbound ramp from 1 to 2 lanes. $ 100,000,000 $ 144,829,817 2031-2035 PLA25603 Planned PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 4
In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; Reconfigure I80/SR 65 interchange to construct one lane HOV direct connectors from eastbound to northbound and southbound to westbound (HOV lanes would extend to between Galleria Blvd. and Pleasant Grove Blvd. on SR 65). $ 95,000,000 $ 155,668,562 2036-2040 Planned PLA PCTPA F- Transit O&M (Bus) Local and Commuter Transit Bus Expansion Lump-Sum for increased local and commuter bus service operating and maintenance costs and bus purchase and replacement. $ 475,000,000 $ 778,342,809 2036-2040 PLA25634 Planned PLA PCTPA
E- Transit Capital
(Major) Placer County - Bus Rapid Transit Capital
Capital Costs for a three route Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system serving South Placer County; including planning, engineering, environmental studies, right-ofway acquisition, vehicles, related roadway improvements, signalization, park & ride facilities, signage, bus stop improvements, ITS elements, fare vending equipment. BRT Route 1-CSUS Placer to Galleria to Watt/I-80 LRT station via I80 HOV lane. BRT Route 2 - CSUS Placer to Placer Vineyards to Watt/I-80 LRT station via Watt Avenue. BRT Route 3 - Galleria to Hazel & Sunrise LRT stations via Sierra College Boulevard/Hazel Avenue. $ 82,526,000 $ 135,228,460 2036-2040 PLA25585 Planned PLA PCTPA
F- Transit O&M (BRT &
Express) Placer County - Bus Rapid Transit O&M
Annual operating & maintenance (O&M) costs ($5,704,000) specifically for a three route BRT system for Fiscal years 2023-2040 for a TBD transit operator. $ 142,600,001 $ 233,666,706 2036-2040 PLA25468 Programmed PLA PCTPA
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Placer County Congestion Management Program Provide educational and outreach efforts regarding alternative transportation modes to employers, residents, and the school community through the Placer County Congestion Management Program (CMP). CMP activities will be coordinated with the City of Roseville and SACOG's Regional Rideshare / TDM Program. (Emission Benefits kg/day: ROG 11.44; NOx 11.59; PM2.5 5.54). Toll Credits for CON $ 1,256,813 2020-2025
PLA25543 Programmed PLA PCTPA
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Placer County Freeway Service Patrol
In Placer County: provide motorist assistance and towing of disabled vehicles during am and pm commute periods on I-80 (Riverside Ave to SR 49) and SR 65 (I-80 to Twelve Bridges Dr). (Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG 5.62; NOx 2.25; PM2.5 0.34) $ 2,703,927 2020-2025
PLA25631 Planned PLA PCTPA F- Transit O&M (Bus) Placer County Transit Operating & Maintenance Lump-sum annual Operating & Maintenance costs for fiscal years 2023-2040; does not account for expansion of service $ 224,910,000 $ 368,541,224 2036-2040 PLA25413 Programmed PLA PCTPA
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Planning, Programming, Monitoring 2011-2019 PCTPA plan, program, monitor (PPM) for RTPA related activities. $ 1,455,000 2020-2025 PLA25529 Programmed PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Phase 1 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 1: From Blue Oaks Blvd. to Galleria Blvd., construct third lane on southbound SR 65 and auxiliary lane from Galleria Blvd. to Pleasant Grove Blvd on southbound SR 65, including widening Galleria Blvd. southbound off-ramp to two lanes (Toll credits for PA&ED)(Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG 15.80; NOx 15.88; PM10 11.66) $ 20,750,000 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25637 Planned PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Phase 2 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 2: From Galleria Blvd. to Blue Oaks Blvd., widen from 5 to 7 lanes with 1 carpool lane southbound and 1 general purpose lane northbound, and construct auxiliary lanes from Galleria Blvd. to Pleasant Grove Blvd on northbound and southbound SR 65, including widening Galleria Blvd. southbound off-ramp, Pleasant Grove Blvd. southbound on-ramp, and Blue Oaks Blvd. southbound on-ramps and northbound on-ramp. $ 35,250,000 $ 39,882,140 2020-2025 PLA25637 Planned PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Phase 2 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 2: From Galleria Blvd. to Blue Oaks Blvd., widen from 5 to 7 lanes with 1 carpool lane southbound and 1 general purpose lane northbound, and construct auxiliary lanes from Galleria Blvd. to Pleasant Grove Blvd on northbound and southbound SR 65, including widening Galleria Blvd. southbound off-ramp, Pleasant Grove Blvd. southbound on-ramp, and Blue Oaks Blvd. southbound on-ramps and northbound on-ramp. $ 35,250,000 $ 39,882,140 2020-2025 PLA25637 Planned PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Phase 2 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 2: From Galleria Blvd. to Blue Oaks Blvd., widen from 5 to 7 lanes with 1 carpool lane southbound and 1 general purpose lane northbound, and construct auxiliary lanes from Galleria Blvd. to Pleasant Grove Blvd on northbound and southbound SR 65, including widening Galleria Blvd. southbound off-ramp, Pleasant Grove Blvd. southbound on-ramp, and Blue Oaks Blvd. southbound on-ramps and northbound on-ramp. $ 35,250,000 $ 39,882,140 2020-2025 PLA25637 Planned PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Phase 2 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 2: From Galleria Blvd. to Blue Oaks Blvd., widen from 5 to 7 lanes with 1 carpool lane southbound and 1 general purpose lane northbound, and construct auxiliary lanes from Galleria Blvd. to Pleasant Grove Blvd on northbound and southbound SR 65, including widening Galleria Blvd. southbound off-ramp, Pleasant Grove Blvd. southbound on-ramp, and Blue Oaks Blvd. southbound on-ramps and northbound on-ramp. $ 35,250,000 $ 39,882,140 2020-2025 PLA25638 Planned PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Phase 3 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 3: From Blue Oaks Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., construct auxiliary lanes both northbound and southbound, including widening Lincoln Blvd. southbound on-ramp. $ 12,000,000 $ 15,361,015 2026-2030 PLA25719
Project
Development Only PLA PCTPA
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Phase 4 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 4: From Lincoln Blvd. to Blue Oaks Blvd., widen southbound in median to add lane; and from north of Galleria Blvd. (end of the I-80/SR 65 Interchange project) to Lincoln Blvd., widen northbound in median to add lane. Future environmental document will be completed to determine if widening in median will be carpool or general purpose lanes. $ 55,000,000 Post-2040 PLA25826 Planned PLA PCTPA
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance, PCTPA
Lump-sum estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, snow removal, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($52,000,000 annually) $ 1,040,000,000 $ 1,704,161,098 2036-2040 PLA15070
Project
Development Only PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Auburn Ravine Road at I-80 Overcrossing
Auburn Ravine Road overcrossing over I-80 between Bowman Road to Lincoln Way: widen overcrossing from 2 to 4 lanes. $ 60,000,000 Post-2040 PLA25127
Project
Development Only PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Baseline Road Four to Six Lane Widening (West Portion) Placer County, Baseline Road from Watt Avenue to Sutter County Line, widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $ 22,000,000 Post-2040
PLA15105 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Baseline Road Widening Phase 1 (West Portion) Baseline Rd. from Watt Avenue to future 16th street: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $ 19,200,000 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25463 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Baseline Road Widening Phase 2 (West Portion)
Baseline Road from Sutter County Line to Future 16th Street. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $ 29,000,000 2020-2025
PLA25671 Programmed PLA Placer County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Bell Road at I-80 Roundabouts
The project will replace the existing traffic signal and all-way stop control at the Bell Road / Interstate 80 interchange with two roundabouts.. Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 8,000,000 2026-2030
PLA25448 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Bowman Rd Bridge, north of 19C-61
Bowman Rd, over UP Railroad, BNSF Railyards & AMTRAK, 0.1 miles north of 19C-61: Rehabilitate the existing bridge without adding additional lanes. (Toll credits for CON). Toll Credits for CON $ 3,637,018 2020-2025 PLA25447 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Bowman Rd Bridge, south of 19C-62
Bowman Rd, over UP Railroad, BNSF RR and AMTRAK, 0.1 miles south of 19C62: Rehabilitate the existing bridge without adding additional lanes. (Toll credits for CON). Toll Credits for CON $ 3,248,002 2020-2025 PLA25536 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Crosby Harold Rd. Bridge
Crosby Harold Rd. Over Doty Creek, 0.9 mi N of Wise Rd.: Replace an existing 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 5,000,000 2020-2025
PLA25663 Programmed PLA Placer County A- Bike & Ped Crosswalk Safety Enhancements At various locations in Placer County: Install crosswalk enhancements to existing unprotected crosswalks. (H8-03-010). Toll Credits for CON $ 249,700 2020-2025 PLA25449 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Dowd Rd Bridge Replacement at Coon Creek Dowd Rd over Coon Creek, 0.4 miles north of Wise Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits programmed for ROW & CON).

Toll Credits for ROW, CON $ 10,900,000 2020-2025
PLA25474 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Dowd Rd Bridge Replacement at Markham Ravine Dowd Rd, over Markham Ravine, 0.5 miles south Nicolaus Rd: Replace existing 2 lane structurally deficient bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits for CON.). Toll Credits for CON $ 6,050,000 2020-2025
PLA18390 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Dyer Lane Extension
Extend Dyer Lane west/north to Baseline Road at Brewer Road and east/north to Baseline Road west of Fiddyment Road and widen to four lanes in accordance with the Placer Vineyards Specific Plan. $ 10,025,700 $ 11,343,159 2020-2025 PLA25757
Project
Development Only PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Dyer Lane Widening
Widen Dyer Lane from Baseline Rd at Brewer Rd to Baseline Road near Fiddyment from 2 to 4 lanes in accordance with the Placer Vineyards Specific Plan. $ 10,025,700 Post-2040
PLA25725 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Education Street
Construct 2 lane roadway and signal modifications - east of SR 49 to Quartz Drive $ 3,835,900 $ 4,234,116 2020-2025
PLA25130 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Fiddyment Road Widening
Widen Fiddyment Road from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from Roseville City Limits to Athens Road. $ 11,550,000 $ 14,784,976 2026-2030
PLA15220 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Foothills Boulevard
Foothills Blvd.: Construct as a 2 lane road from the City of Roseville to Sunset Blvd. $ 8,452,200 $ 10,819,531 2026-2030
PLA25541 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Gold Hill Rd. Bridge Replacement
Gold Hill Rd. over Auburn Ravine, 0.65 mi north of SR 193: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 6,672,600 2020-2025
PLA25661 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Haines Rd. Bridge Replacement
Haines Rd., over South Fork of Dry Creek, south of Dry Creek Rd.: Replace existing 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 6,200,000 2020-2025 PLA25479 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity New Road: 16th St.

Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Sacramento/Placer County Line to Baseline Rd. $ 7,118,300 $ 8,053,703 2020-2025
PLA15270 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity North Antelope Road
North Antelope Road, from Sacramento County line to PFE Road: Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. $ 1,704,300 $ 2,792,694 2036-2040
PLA15300 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Parallel Rd.

In Placer County, east of Route 49, from Dry Creek Rd to Quartz Rd, construct a 2 lane road. Name of road shall be determined in the future. $ 12,244,300 $ 15,673,739 2026-2030 PLA20690
Project
Development Only PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity PFE Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from North Antelope Rd. to Roseville City Limits. $ 2,434,000 Post-2040 PLA18490 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity PFE Rd. Widening PFE Rd, from Watt Ave. to Walerga Rd: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes and realign. $ 13,085,000 2020-2025 PLA25759 Planned PLA Placer County F- Transit O&M (Bus) Placer County Transit Operations and Preventive Maintenance in Urbanized Area $ 6,000,000 $ 6,788,449 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25761 Planned PLA Placer County F- Transit O&M (Bus) Placer County Transit/Tahoe Truckee Area Regional Transit, Bus Replacement Bus Replacement Program $ 2,500,000 $ 2,828,521 2020-2025 PLA25760 Planned PLA Placer County F- Transit O&M (Bus) Placer County Transit/Tahoe Truckee Area Regional Transit, Non Urbanized Ops Operations in Non-Urbanized areas of Placer County $ 4,000,000 $ 4,525,633 2020-2025 PLA25299 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Placer Parkway Phase 1
In Placer County: Between SR 65 and Foothills Boulevard; Construct phase 1 of Placer Parkway, including upgrading the SR 65/Whitney Ranch Parkway interchange to include a southbound slip off-ramp, southbound loop on-ramp, northbound loop on-ramp, six-lane bridge over SR 65, and four-lane roadway extension from SR 65 (Whitney Ranch Parkway) to Foothills Boulevard. $ 70,000,000 2020-2025 PLA25337 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Placer Parkway Phase 2
Construct New Road: 4 lane divided Hwy. between Foothills Boulevard and Fiddyment Road. Includes signalized intersections at Fiddyment Rd. $ 14,500,000 $ 17,235,943 2026-2030 PLA20350 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Quartz Drive Extension Extend Quartz Drive from Route 49 to Bell Road. $ 6,902,600 $ 11,310,714 2036-2040 PLA25726 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Richardson Drive Construct 2 lane roadway - connection between Dry Creek Road and Bell Road $ 6,243,200 $ 7,063,608 2020-2025 PLA25650 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Safety Improvements
At 19 intersections throughout southwest Placer County: Installation of lighting, upgraded pavement markings, and flashing beacon improvements.

Signal installation at Auburn Folsom Rd and Cavitt-Stallman Road (local funds).

HSIP7-03-009 (Toll Credits for CON) $ 2,694,200 2020-2025 PLA15390 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Widening A
Widen Sierra College Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Route 193 to Loomis Town Limits. $ 15,400,000 $ 17,423,686 2020-2025
PLA25598 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 49 Widening A Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Bell Road to Locksley Lane $ 8,350,650 $ 9,447,994 2020-2025 PLA25724
Project
Development Only PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 49 Widening B Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Locksley Lane to Dry Creek Road $ 8,350,650 Post-2040 PLA25628 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity SR 49 Widening C Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from Luther Road to Nevada Street. $ 9,595,600 $ 13,897,290 2031-2035 PLA25630 Planned PLA Placer County
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS SR49 Signalizations/ Improvements Signalizations and Improvements along SR 49 in Auburn/North Auburn. $ 5,705,100 $ 8,469,253 2036-2040 PLA25827 Planned PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance, Placer
Estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, snow removal, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($ 19,000,000 annually) $ 380,000,000 $ 622,674,247 2036-2040 PLA25170 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sunset Blvd Phase 2
Sunset Blvd, from Foothills Boulevard to Fiddyment Rd: Construct a 2-lane road extension [PLA15410 is Phase 1.] $ 6,365,000 2020-2025 PLA25044 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sunset Blvd. Widening A
Widen Sunset Boulevard from State Route 65 to Cincinnati Avenue from 2 to 6 lanes. Project includes widening Industrial Blvd / UPRR overcrossing from 2 to 6 lanes. $ 37,500,000 2020-2025
PLA25584 Planned PLA Placer County A- Bike & Ped Truckee River Trail Along SR89, from Squaw Valley Road to the USFS Silver Creek Campground:
construct 1.4 miles of multi-use trail . (Emission Benefits in kg/day; ROG 0.01; NOx 0.01) $ 8,000,000 $ 9,051,266 2020-2025
PLA25506 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Walerga Rd/Dry Creek Bridge Replacement
Walerga Rd, over Dry Creek, 1.1 mi S Base Line Rd. Replace the existing 2 lane bridge with a 4 lane bridge.. Toll Credits for CON $ 45,247,021 2020-2025 PLA15420 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Walerga Road
Walerga Rd: Widen and realign from 2 to 4 lanes from Baseline Rd. to Placer / Sacramento County line. $ 13,781,700 2020-2025
PLA25535 Programmed PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Watt Ave. Bridge Replacement
Watt Ave./Center Joint Ave., over Dry Creek, 0.4 mi north of P.F.E. Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a 4 lane bridge. $ 19,892,750 2020-2025 PLA20700 Planned PLA Placer County
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Watt Avenue
Watt Avenue, from Baseline Rd. to Sacramento County Line: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $ 14,582,700 $ 16,498,987 2020-2025

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25513 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Wise Rd Bridge Replacement
Wise Rd, over Doty Creek, 0.5 miles east of Garden Bar: Replace existing 1-lane functionally obsolete bridge with a new 2-lane bridge.. Toll Credits for CON $ 4,876,390 2020-2025 PLA25505 Programmed PLA Placer County
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Yankee Jim's Rd Bridge at North Fork American River Bridge No. 19C0002, Yankee Jim's Rd over North Fork American River, 1.5MI W of Shirttail Cyn Rd, Replace structurally deficient 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW & CON.). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 44,651,000 2020-2025
PCT10511 Programmed PLA
Placer County
Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) Preventive Maintenance and Operation Assistance, 2019 Operating assistance and preventive maintenance for urban transit services within Placer CountyFFY 2019 - Operating Assistance $1,287,480FFY 2019 - Preventive Maintenance $433,093 $ 1,720,573 2020-2025
PLA20721
Project
Development Only PLA
South Placer
Regional
Transportation
Authority
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Placer Parkway
New 4 lane connector (ultimate 6 lanes freeway) in 500'- to 1,000'-wide corridor connecting SR 70/99 (between Riego Road & Sankey Road) to Watt Avenue. (Note: as the project proceeds, Parkway segments will be administered by different lead agencies depending upon location of the segment. In Placer County, it will be SPRTA or Roseville and/or Placer County; in Sutter County it will be Sutter County.) $ 295,000,000 Post-2040 PLA25592 Planned PLA
South Placer
Regional
Transportation
Authority
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Placer Parkway Phase 3
Construct New Road: 4 lane divided Hwy. between Fiddyment Rd and Watt Avenue. Includes signalized intersections at Watt Avenue. $ 85,000,000 $ 126,182,978 2036-2040 PLA25264 Planned PLA Town of Loomis A- Bike & Ped Antelope Creek Bikeway Bikeway Facilities: In Loomis along Antelope Creek, construct Class I bike and pedestrian facility. Federal permitting may be required as part of this project. $ 50,000 $ 74,225 2036-2040 PLA25277 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Brace Rd. Bridge Improvements Replace Bridge: at Secret Ravine creek. Includes: ancillary road work. $ 50,000 $ 74,225 2036-2040 PLA25708
Project
Development Only PLA Town of Loomis
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Brace Rd. Phase 2
Widen from I-80 Overpass to Horseshoe Bar Rd. to standard lane widths.

Includes: bike lanes. $ 100,000 Post-2040
PLA15290 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Doc Barnes Dr.

Road Extension: 2 lanes, landscaped median and bike lanes from Horseshoe Bar Rd. to King Rd. $ 200,000 $ 205,000 2020-2025
PLA25261 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80/Brace Road Overcrossing Improvements Modify Bridge: Brace Rd. Bridge to Caltrans standards. $ 1,000,000 $ 1,484,506 2036-2040 PLA25262 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS King Rd. Interchange Modification and Aux Lane Interchange Modification: existing King Rd. overcrossing to accommodate freeway access for traffic from King Rd. onto WB I-80. Includes: a transition auxiliary lane on I-80 from King Rd. to Horseshoe Bar interchange. $ 500,000 $ 742,253 2036-2040 PLA25279 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation King Rd. Ops Improvements
Roadway Operational Improvements: at Sucker Ravine and King Rd. expand culvert. Includes: ancillary road work. Federal permitting may also be required as part of this project. $ 10,000 $ 14,845 2036-2040
PLA25278 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Operational Improvements on Antelope Creek Roadway Operational Improvements: Expand/ replace culvert along Antelope Creek at King Rd. from Sierra College Blvd. to Vet Clinic. Includes: ancillary road work. $ 60,000 $ 63,038 2020-2025
PLA15350
Project
Development Only PLA Town of Loomis
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Rocklin Rd. Widening
In Loomis, Rocklin Rd. from Barton Rd. to west town limits: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $ 1,200,000 Post-2040
PLA25274 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation S. Holly Area
Roadway Operational Improvements: Storm drain extension in the South Holly area. Includes: ancillary road work. Federal permitting may also be required as part of this project. $ 40,000 $ 47,547 2026-2030
PLA25263 Planned PLA Town of Loomis A- Bike & Ped Secret Ravine Bikeway Facilities: Along Secret Ravine creek system from north Loomis town limits to south Loomis town limits, construct Class I bike and pedestrian facility. $ 60,000 $ 71,321 2026-2030
PLA20510
Project
Development Only PLA Town of Loomis
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Railroad Crossing Improvements Construct 4 lane overcrossing/undercrossing at UPRR Tracks. $ 3,000,000 Post-2040

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
PLA25280 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Sierra College Blvd. Widening B
Roadway Operational Improvements: Culvert expansion at Loomis Tributary and Sierra College Blvd. Includes: ancillary road work. $ 40,000 $ 47,547 2026-2030 PLA20890 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Widening C
In Loomis, Sierra College Blvd. from railroad tracks (Taylor Rd.) to the north town limits: widen from 2 to 4 lanes and construct turn lanes, bike lanes, and landscaped median. $ 5,899,180 $ 9,666,493 2036-2040
PLA20960 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Sierra College Boulevard Widening
In Loomis, Sierra College Blvd. from Granite Drive to Taylor Road: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $ 3,600,000 $ 3,600,000 2020-2025
PLA25828 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Street & Road Maintenance
Estimated street and road maintenance costs including signals, safety devices, & street lights, storm drains, storm damage, patching, overlay and sealing, other street purpose maintenance. Excludes major rehabilitation and reconstruction projects. ($ 634,000 annually) $ 12,680,000 $ 20,777,656 2036-2040 PLA25269 Planned PLA Town of Loomis
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Taylor Rd. Operational Improvments A
Roadway Operational Improvements: Construct storm drain facility from King Rd. to Sierra College Blvd. Includes: ancillary road work. Federal permitting may also be required as part of this project. Phase 1 is King Rd. to Walnut Street, $800,000. $ 230,000 $ 241,644 2020-2025
PLA25594 Planned PLA
Western Placer
Consolidated
Transportation
Service Agency
E- Transit Capital
(Major) Placer County - CTSA Capital
Capital costs for CTSA Article 4.5 & complementary ADA dial-a-ride services for designated CTSA operating in Placer County, including vehicles, miscellaneous capital items & facilities expansion. $ 55,490,317 $ 90,927,346 2036-2040 PLA25593 Planned PLA
Western Placer
Consolidated
Transportation
Service Agency
F- Transit O&M
(Demand Response) Placer County - CTSA O&M
Annual operation & maintenance (O&M) costs for Article 4.5 Community Transit Services & complimentary Transit Services & complimentary ADA dial-aride services for designated CTSA of Placer County servicing Placer County & Cities $ 28,233,907 $ 46,264,544 2036-2040
CAL20932 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS 5th St. US-50 In Sacramento County on diagonal ramp at 5th St. Install ramp meter $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040 CAL21020 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
Arden to SB-51/160. Add meter; change config from 1 to 2+1; convert ex to HOV; extend weaving area to Rte 51/160 SEP.

Arden to SB-51/160. Add meter; change config from 1 to 2+1; convert ex to HOV; extend weaving area to Rte 51/160 SEP. SHOPP ID 18472 $ 10,610,000 $ 13,581,697 2026-2030 CAL21286 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
At various locations on Sac, Ed, Yol, Pla and Nev counties on Routes 5,50,51,65,80,89 and 99. Upgrade existing CCTV
cameras.

At various locations on Sac, Ed, Yol, Pla and Nev counties on Routes 5,50,51,65,80,89 and 99. Upgrade existing CCTV cameras. SHOPP ID 17691 $ 2,376,000 $ 3,041,481 2026-2030 CAL21287 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
At various locations on Sac, ED, Yol, Pla, Nev and Sut counties on Routes 5,50,51,65,80,89,99,160 and 267. Upgrade existing CMS signs with LED.

At various locations on Sac, ED, Yol, Pla, Nev and Sut counties on Routes 5,50,51,65,80,89,99,160 and 267. Upgrade existing CMS signs with LED. SHOPP ID 17692 $ 4,224,000 $ 5,407,077 2026-2030
CAL20625 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Caltrans District 3 Traffic Management Center (TMC) Upgrade Caltrans District 3 TMC to manage US 50, I-80 and other ITS Deployments $ 1,500,000 $ 1,783,029 2026-2030
CAL20642 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity Capital City Freeway (SR 51) widening over the American River Bridge Widening: Widen SR51 over the American River NB and SB, to 4 lanes plus a managed lane facility in both directions. New Class I bike path next to the freeway. (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 131,000,000 $ 155,717,834 2026-2030 CAL20908 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Connector Ramp Meter NB 99 to EB 50 SR 99 In Sacramento County on connector ramp at NB 99 to EB 50 Install connector ramp meter $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040
CAL21197 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Connector Ramp Meter NB 99 to WB 50 SR 99 In Sacramento County on connector ramp at NB 99 to WB 50 Install connector ramp meter $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040
CAL21023
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS EB El Camino to NB 51. Change config to 1+1, add aux. EB El Camino to NB 51. Change config to 1+1, add accel. SHOPP ID 17698 $ 3,102,000 Post-2040 CAL20850 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity EB El Camino to SB Sac-51. Change config from 1 to 1+1. EB El Camino to SB Sac-51. Change config from 1 to 1+1. SHOPP ID 18473 $ 1,370,000 $ 1,753,716 2026-2030

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21019 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity EB Expo to SB 51. Change config from 1 to 2+1. EB Expo to SB 51. Change config from 1 to 2+1. SHOPP ID 18471 $ 2,030,000 $ 2,598,572 2026-2030 CAL20848 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Facilities, Main HQ Shop Main HQ Shop (32101) $ 78,000,000 $ 127,812,082 2036-2040 CAL21017 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Facilities, Main HQ Shop North Warehouse Main HQ Shop North Warehouse $ 19,500,000 $ 31,953,021 2036-2040 CAL21016 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation Facilities, Transportation Laboratory Equipment Sub Shop Transportation Laboratory Equipment Sub Shop $ 10,400,000 $ 17,041,611 2036-2040 CAL20853
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
Fulton to NB 51. Extend all existing 2+1 lanes and extend aux lane.

Fulton to NB 51. Extend all existing 2+1
lanes and extend accel lane. SHOPP ID 18481 $ 4,010,000 Post-2040 CAL20851
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Fulton to SB-51. Change config to 1+1, add aux. Fulton to SB-51. Change config to 1+1, add accel. SR-51 SHOPP ID 18475 $ 2,690,000 Post-2040 CAL21083 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Hazel Ave to Folsom Blvd (T) US-50 In EB direction from Hazel Ave to Folsom Blvd (T) install auxiliary lane $ 1,500,000 $ 1,697,112 2020-2025 CAL21025 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Howe to NB 51. Lengthen aux lane. Howe to NB 51. Lengthen aux lane. SHOPP ID 18480 $ 2,690,000 $ 3,443,427 2026-2030 CAL21024
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS Howe to NB-51. Reconstruct I/C, hook ramp Howe to NB-51. Reconstruct I/C, hook ramp, can't meter. SHOPP ID 18479 $ 19,850,000 Post-2040 CAL20591
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I- 5 / SR 99 Interchange
I-5/SR 99 Interchange Reconstruction: includes: managed lane facility freeway to freeway connectors. $ 200,000,000 Post-2040
CAL21281 Planned SAC Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped I-5 ADA Improvements ADA Design-Build at various locations in District 3 and in District 4 in Solano County. EA 0H320 $ 50,000,000 $ 55,190,645 2020-2025
CAL18410 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 and I-80 Managed Lane Connectors and Lanes to Downtown Reconstruct I-5/I-80 Interchange, including lmanaged lane facility connectors, and construction of managed lane facility from the I-5/I-80 Interchange to downtown Sacramento (PM 26.7/27.0) [EFIS ID 0300000313] (Emission Benefits in kg/day 1.0 ROG) (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 300,000,000 $ 445,351,686 2036-2040 CAL20771 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 at West End Viaduct (SHOPP Long Lead) In the city of Sacramento, at West End Viaduct #24-0069R/L (PM 23.6/24.3) - Improve to standard truck capacity (SHOPP Long Lead) [CTIPS ID 107-0000- 1116]. EA 1H610 $ 51,434,000 2026-2030
CAL21270 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 auxiliary (or transition lane) from Cosumnes River Blvd to Pocket Road
In the City of Sacramento construct auxilary (or transition) lanes from Cosumnes River Blvd to Pocket Road in both directions $ 1,500,000 $ 1,739,540 2026-2030 CAL21272 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 Auxiliary Lane (NB) from Del Paso Road to SR 99 NB
connector ramp
In Sacramento County construct auxiliary lanes on I-5 from Del Paso Road off ramp to SR 99 NB connector ramp (PM 28.817-29.772) $ 4,770,000 $ 6,739,885 2031-2035 CAL20809
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 Auxiliary Lane (NB) from SR 99 NB connector off ramp to SR 99 SB connector on ramp
In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/SR 99 interchange from SR 99 NB connector off ramp to SR 99 SB connector on ramp extend acceleration lanes (NB) on I-5 $ 2,520,000 Post-2040
CAL21256 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 Auxiliary lane from Arena Blvd off ramp to Arena Blvd on ramp (SB)
In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/Arena Blvd interchange construction an auxiliary lane between the SB off and on ramps (PMs 27.757 to 28.320) $ 1,500,000 $ 2,119,461 2031-2035 CAL20975 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Bridge Improvements B West End Viaduct Bridge No. 24-0069R/L $ 156,800,000 $ 181,839,928 2026-2030 CAL21074 Planned Sac Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
I-5 CAPM Strategy from American River Bridge to Yolo County Line (PM 25.40 to 34.60)
In Sacramento County from American River Bridge (#24-0068) to Yolo County line: CAPM. EA 1H170 $ 49,590,000 $ 51,106,537 2020-2025 CAL20589 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 Connector Ramp Extension
I-5: Extend Southbound connector ramp from U.S. 50 connector-ramp to the Sutterville Rd. off-ramp (PM 20.726 to 21.55). $ 4,746,000 $ 5,503,905 2026-2030

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL20875 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Detection
In Sac, Yol, Col, & Gle Counties on Route 5 at various locations. Inductive Loop Replacement. SHOPP ID 20775 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,277,233 2036-2040 CAL20697 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Elkhorn SRRA Water and Waste Water Rehab Near the City of Sacramento, at the Elkhorn Safety Roadside Rest Area (SRRA) (PM 33.7) - Upgrade potable water and wastewater systems (Toll Credits). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON (EA: 4F580) (EFIS: 0314000186) $ 4,614,000 2020-2025 CAL20693 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Fiber Optics
In Sacramento, on I-5, from 1.1 miles south of Elk Grove Boulevard to Route 50 - Install fiber optic cable (PM 9.7/22.7) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1004] (Toll Credits).

Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $ 10,580,000 2020-2025
CAL20466 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 1
In Sacramento County on I-5, from US 50 to Morrison Creek ? Add highoccupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes (i.e., bus/carpool lanes) and soundwalls in both directions (PM 12.9/22.5) [EFIS ID 0312000165]; see 03-3C002 (CAL20467) for Phase 2 [PA&ED being done under 03-3C000 (CAL17840)]. (Toll Credits for PE and ROW) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 52.9 NOx, 50.4 ROG, 10.5 PM10) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0880]
(The I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 project (03-3C001/CAL20466) will be combined for construction with the I-5 Road Rehab project (03-0H100/CAL20700) and the I-5 Fiber Optics Installation project (03-4F450/CAL20693) to form the overall I-5 Corridor Enhancement project (03-0H10U). Project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes $ 42,000,000 2020-2025 CAL20467 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 2
In Sacramento County on I-5, from 1.1 mile south of Elk Grove Blvd to just north of Morrison Creek - Add managed lane facility (PM 9.7/13.1) [EFIS ID 0312000171]; see 03-3C001 (CAL20466) for Phase 1 [PA&ED being done under 03-3C000 (CAL17840)]. (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 15,000,000 2020-2025 CAL20824 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 ICM Implement ICM strategies on the I-5 Corridor (Non-capacity) $ 45,000,000 $ 66,802,753 2036-2040 CAL20645 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 ITS - Fiber Optic - 5 In Sacramento County on I-5 from Pocket Road to Jct I-80 $ 2,800,000 $ 3,247,142 2026-2030 CAL21261 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 Loop Ramp Meter at the I-5/Twin Cities Rd. interchange (SB) In the Sacramento County at the I-5/Twin Cities Road interchange (SB I-5) install a loop ramp meter (1+1 configuraiton) (PM 19.929) $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040 CAL20586
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 Managed Lanes A
Managed Lanes: US 50 to Junction I-80 in both directions, including a new Class I bike path over the American River (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 116,000,000 Post-2040 CAL18790
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 Managed Lanes B
Managed Lanes: Junction I-80 to Sacramento International Airport in both directions (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 100,000,000 Post-2040 CAL21260
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 Managed Lanes C I-5 Managed Lanes: Hood Franklin (1.1 mile south) to Elk Grove Boulevard $ 35,000,000 Post-2040 CAL21275 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5 Managed Lanes from Sutterville Road to Yolo County Line In Sacramento County on I-5 from just north of Sutterville Road to the Yolo County line: Construct improvements consisting of managed lanes in each direction, auxiliary lanes, and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements. EA 4H580 $ 312,000,000 2026-2030

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL21234
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 NB add auxiliary lane from Hood Frankin slip on-ramp to Elk Grove Blvd off-ramp
In Sacramento County at the I-5/Hood Franklin interchange, add truck-only lane in both directions from Hood Frankin Blvd slip on-ramp to Elk Grove Blvd off-ramp $ 900,000 Post-2040
CAL20816 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 NB Connector ramp meter at the I-5/I-80 Interchange (EB 80 to NB 5)
In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/I-80 interchange (PM 26.72), install a connector ramp meter from EB I-80 to NB I-5. Future configuration is a 2+1. $ 1,940,000 $ 2,741,169 2031-2035 CAL20817 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 NB Connector ramp meter at the I-5/I-80 Interchange (WB 80 to NB 5)
In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/I-80 interchange (PM 26.96), install a connector ramp meter from WB I-80 to NB I-5. Future configuration is a 2+1. $ 1,940,000 $ 2,741,169 2031-2035 CAL21269 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 NB Connector ramp meter at the I-5/US 50 Interchange (EB 50 to NB 5)
In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/US 50 interchange, install a connector ramp meter from EB US 50 to NB I-5 (PM 22.646) $ 1,940,000 $ 3,178,916 2036-2040 CAL20910 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation
I-5 NB Connector ramp meter at the I-5/US 50 Interchange (WB 50 to NB 5)
In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/US 50 interchange, install a connector ramp meter from WB US 50 to NB I-5 (PM 23.79) $ 1,940,000 $ 2,249,805 2026-2030 CAL20819 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 NB Loop Ramp Meter at the I-5/Airpord Blvd. interchange In Sacramento County at the I-5/Airport Blvd interchange (PM 32.69) install a loop ramp meter at the NB ramp $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035 CAL21238 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 NB Ramp Meter at Twin Cities Road Near Galt, at the Twin Cities Road/SR 99 interchange (PM 2.33), install a NB ramp meter (diagonal) $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040
CAL21035 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Pavement Rehabilitation B
In Sacramento County on Route 5 from the San Joaquin County Line to approx

0.2 miles north of Twin Cities Rd. (PM 0.0/2.5) SHOPP ID 20398 $ 22,700,000 $ 26,983,167 2026-2030 CAL20774 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Permit Load Mobility Improvement
In the city of Sacramento (Sac-5-22.1/26.7), from 0.5 mile south of SR 50 to I80 at South Connector Undercrossing #24-0267 (PM 22.42) and at American River Viaduct #24-0068R/L (PM 24.82) - Improve to standard truck capacity [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1115]. Toll Credits for ENG $ 247,230,000 $ 286,711,004 2026-2030 CAL20700 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Road Rehab
In and near the City of Sacramento, from Beach Lake Bridge at Morrison Creek to the American River Bridge (#24-0068) (PM 13.0/24.9): Roadway rehabilitation. The I-5 Corridor Enhancement project (03-0H10U) combines the I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 (03-3C001/CAL20466), I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 2 (03- 3C002/CAL20467), I-5 Road Rehab (03-0H100/CAL20700), I-5 Elk Grove Aux Lane (03-3H570/CAL20777), and the I-5 Fiber Optics (03-4F450/CAL20693) for construction.. Toll Credits for ENG, ROW $ 267,400,000 2020-2025 CAL21060 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-5 Roadside Planting Rehabilitation B
In Sacramento County on Route 5 from approx. 0.2 mile north of I St to Richards Blvd. Highway Planting Rehab. SHOPP ID 20605 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,545,291 2026-2030 CAL21259 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 SB add auxiliary lane from Elk Grove Blvd on-ramp toHood Frankin slip off-ramp
In Sacramento County at the I-5/Hood Franklin interchange, install a NB ramp meter (loop) for the EB direction (PM 8.44). Future configuration 1+1. This project is part of EA 4F240. $ 900,000 $ 1,474,755 2036-2040 CAL20815 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 SB Connector Ramp Meter at the I-5/I-80 interchange (EB I80 to SB I-5)In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/I-80 interchange (PM 26.55) install a connector ramp meter at the SB ramp from EB I-80 to SB I-5 $ 1,940,000 $ 2,741,169 2031-2035 CAL21251 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 SB Connector Ramp Meter at the I-5/US 50 interchange In the City of Sacramento at the I-5/US 50 interchange, install a connector ramp meter from EB US 50 to SB I-5 (PM 22.347) $ 1,940,000 $ 3,178,916 2036-2040 CAL20899 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 SB Diagonal Ramp Meter at the I-5 rest stop In Sacramento County, approximately one mile east of the Sac/Yolo County line, install a SB diagonal ramp meter at the rest stop south of I-5 $ 380,000 $ 622,674 2036-2040 CAL21242 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 SB Loop Ramp meter at the I-5/Elk Grove Blvd interchange In the City of Elk Grove at the I-5/Elk Grove Blvd interchange install a loop ramp meter. Future configuration is a 1+1. (PM 10.882) $ 900,000 $ 1,271,676 2031-2035 CAL21264 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 SB Loop Ramp Meter at the I-5/Laguna Blvd interchange In the City of Elk Grove at the I-5/Laguna Blvd interchange install a loop ramp meter. Future configuration a 1+1. (PM 12.188) $ 380,000 $ 536,930 2031-2035

2020 MTP/SCS Project List
ID Status (Planned,
Programmed or
Project
Development Only)
County Lead Agency Budget Category Title Description Total Project Cost (2018 dollars)
Year of Expenditure
Cost for planned
projects
Completion
Timing
CAL20587 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-5 Transition Lane
I-5 Transition Lane: SB, from Garden Hwy. off-ramp to the Garden Hwy. onramp. $ 4,000,000 $ 4,638,774 2026-2030 CAL21082
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
I-5 transition lane (SB) at rest area 1 mile east of Sac/Yol county line
In Sacramento County, about one mile east of the Sac/Yolo county line, construct a SB transition lane at the rest area off ramp to rest area on-ramp (PM 34.008-33.716) $ 1,500,000 Post-2040
CAL21258
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
I-5 transition lane (SB) Del Paso off ramp to Del Paso loop on ramp (T), if SR-99 added lane
In the City of Sacramento (SB) construct transition lane from Del Paso off ramp to Del Paso loop on ramp (T), if SR-99 added lane (PM 29.226-29.084) $ 6,070,000 Post-2040 CAL21073 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 Transition Lane (SB) from Airport Blvd on ramp to SR 99 NB Connector B
In Sacramento County near the city of Sacramento, at SB I-5 at the Airport Loop on-ramp. Extend aux lane & add storage lane. (SHOPP ID: 18155) $ 3,000,000 $ 4,915,849 2036-2040 CAL21273
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
I-5 transition lane (SB) from the SR-99 SB connector to Del Paso off ramp, if SR-99 adds a lane
In the City of Sacramento (SB) construct I-5 transition lanes from the SR-99 SB connector to Del Paso off ramp, if SR-99 adds a lane (PM 23.535-29.226) $ 1,500,000 Post-2040 CAL20810
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
I-5 transition lane at the Air Port Blvd slip on ramp to County Road 22 off ramp (NB)
In Sacramento County construct a NB accel. lane at the Airport Blvd slip on ramp to County Road 22 off ramp (PM 32.874-0.469) $ 1,500,000 Post-2040 CAL21257
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity
I-5 transiton lane (SB) Del Paso loop on ramp to Del Paso slip on ramp (T), if SR-99 added lane
In the City of Sacramento (SB) construct I-5 transition lanes from the Del Paso loop on ramp to Del Paso slip on ramp (T), if SR-99 added lane (PM 29.084-

28.882) $ 1,500,000 Post-2040
CAL18801
Project
Development Only SAC Caltrans D3
B- Road & Highway
Capacity I-5/US 50 Riverfront Interchange Reconstruction Reconstruct I-5/US50 Riverfront Interchange, including managed lane connectors (project description may change based on results from the Managed Lanes Study. Project is being evaluated for Expressed Toll Lanes, High Occupancy Toll Lanes, HOV lanes) $ 100,000,000 Post-2040 CAL20707 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-80 Antelope Truck Scales
In Citrus Heights, I-80, from east of Elkhorn Blvd. / Greenback Lane to west of Riverside Ave. (PM 15.2/17.0) - Upgrade weigh-in-motion (WIM) station and widen the westbound auxiliary lane to the Antelope Truck Scales [CTIPS ID 107- 0000-1046]. Toll Credits for ENG (EA 0H530) $ 6,200,000 2020-2025 CAL20858 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Bridge Improvements
In Sacramento County in Sacramento from Northgate Blvd OC to Natomas East Canal OH (PM 4.9/5.4): Rehab 2 structures (Br#24-0217, 24-0218). SHOPP ID 19966 $ 1,535,000 $ 1,824,633 2026-2030
CAL20825 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS I-80 ICM A Implement ICM strategies on the I-80 Corridor (Non-capacity) $ 45,000,000 $ 66,802,753 2036-2040 CAL20764 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Pavement Rehab
Near the City of Sacramento, on I-80, from 0.2 mile east of Longview Drive to

0.4 mile east of Madison Avenue (PM M9.6/12.9) - Pavement rehabilitation [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1104]". EA 1H190 $ 18,230,000 2020-2025 CAL20861 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Pavement Rehabilititation D
In Sacramento County on Route 80 from 0.5 mile east of Madison Ave OC (Br#24-127) to Placer County Line: CAPM. SHOPP ID 20444 $ 25,675,000 $ 13,113,061 2026-2030 CAL20702 Programmed SAC Caltrans D3
C- Maintenance &
Rehabilitation I-80 Rehab Connection Ramp Pavement at Various Locations In and near the City of Sacramento, I-80, from west of West El Camino Avenue to east of Route 244 (PM M1.2/R11.3) - Pavement rehabilitation (Toll Credits).

Toll Credits for ENG,. EA 0H470 $ 14,305,000 2020-2025
CAL21029 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Sac and Sut Counties on Route 99; Sac 99 PM 0.0/36.9; Sut 99 PM 0.0/7.27. Ramp Meter/Aux Improvements.

In Sac and Sut Counties on Route 99; Sac 99 PM 0.0/36.9; Sut 99 PM 0.0/7.27.

Ramp Meter/Aux Improvements. SHOPP ID 18501 $ 380,000 $ 486,432 2026-2030 CAL21015 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Sac Cty on Rte 51 from 0.1 mi south of Tribute Rd UC to 51/244 Connector. Ramp meters.

In Sac Cty on Rte 51 from 0.1 mi south of Tribute Rd UC to 51/244 Connector:

Ramp meters. SHOPP ID 18452 $ 55,000,000 $ 70,404,650 2026-2030 CAL21028 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Sac, Yol, and ED Counties on Route 50; Sac 50 PM L0.0/23.2; Yol 50 PM 0.0/3.2; ED 50 PM 0.0/13.0. Ramp Meter/Aux
Improvements.

In Sac, Yol, and ED Counties on Route 50; Sac 50 PM L0.0/23.2; Yol 50 PM

0.0/3.2; ED 50 PM 0.0/13.0. Ramp Meter/Aux Improvements. SHOPP ID 18499 $ 380,000 $ 486,432 2026-2030 CAL20855 Planned SAC Caltrans D3
G- System
Management,
Operations, and ITS
In Sac, Yol, and Pla Counties on Route 80; Sac 80 PM
M0.0/18.0; Yol 80 PM 0.0/R11.7; Pla 80 PM 0.0/12.3. Ramp Meter/Aux Improvements.

In Sac, Yol, and Pla Counties on Route 80; Sac 80 PM M0.0/18.0; Yol 80 PM

0.0/R11.7; Pla 80 PM 0.0/12.3. Ramp Meter/Aux Improvements. SHOPP ID 18500 $ 380,000 $ 486,432 2026-2030