Sacramento City Council
December 2, 2025

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

6. Water CIP Estimate Detail
A. Water Detailed Summary
B. Water Base Unit Prices
C. Water Estimate Sheets
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Water Transmission Main
Project Segment Description Total
Project
Costs
On-Site
W1.1 On-site Water Transmission Main Conversion County to City -30" Transmission Main $1,778,629 W2.1 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" D-Main North South Easterly Connection to 30" T-Main
$280,800
W2.2 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" North South easterly Conn to Existing 8"in Westlake
$185,760
W2.3 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" ASI Drive -Eastern Segment $683,100 W2.4 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" North South Cul-De-Sac Rdwy $216,000 W2.5 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" Central North Loop (Cul-de-sac to Metro Air Parkway)
$677,700
W2.6 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" ASI Drive Central Segment $496,800 W2.7 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" Metro Air Parkway Segment $151,200 W2.8 On-site Water Distribution Main 12" Westerly Loop (Parcel 1) $1,231,200 On-Site Subtotal $5,701,189
Off-Site
Off-Site Subtotal $0
Total for Water Transmission Main $5,701,189
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Water-Segments Page 1 of 11
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
Item Unit 2023 Estimated
Unit Cost
12" Dia. Water /lf $ 160.00
18" Dia. T-Main /lf $ 250.00
24" Dia. T-Main (Elkhorn Blvd) /lf $ 350.00
30" Dia. T-Main /lf $ 450.00
12" D Main Tie to Existing 8" Main /ls $ 15,000.00
12" D Main Tie to Existing 30" Main ea $ 35,000.00
12" Welded Steel Bridge X-ing /lf $ 750.00
(Cost includes welded steel pipe, supports,, etc.

Water T-Main Directional Drill /lf $ 1,500.00
35% Contingency & Engineering 35%
Notes:

1. Water main per LF costs include appurtenances, valves. ARV assemblies, hydrants, etc. 2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Utility-Base Unit Prices Page 2 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W1.1
On-site Water Transmission Main
Conversion County to City -30" Transmission Main
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia Water Shoefly at New City-County Limit 1 ls 50,000.00 $50,000 12" Dia Water Shoefly at City D-Main Tie-in 1 ls 50,000.00 $50,000 Relocate City-County Metering Station 1 ls 100,000.00 $100,000 Lump Sum T-Main Payment (City to the County) 1 ls 1,012,502.78 $1,012,503 12" D Main Tie to Existing 30" Main 3 ea 35,000.00 $105,000 Total $1,317,503
35% Contingency & Engineering $461,126
Grand Total $1,778,629
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W1.1 - On-Site Trans Main Page 3 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.1
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" D-Main North South Easterly Connection to 30" T-Main Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 1300 /lf 160.00 $208,000
Total $208,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $72,800
Grand Total $280,800
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.1 - On-Site 12" NE Page 4 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.2
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" North South easterly Conn to Existing 8"in Westlake Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 860 /lf $160.00 $137,600
Total $137,600
35% Contingency & Engineering $48,160
Grand Total $185,760
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.2 - On-Site 12" SE Page 5 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.3
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" ASI Drive -Eastern Segment
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 2600 /lf $160.00 $416,000
12" Welded Steel Bridge X-ing 120 /lf $750.00 $90,000
Total $506,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $177,100
Grand Total $683,100
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.3 - ASI E 12" Page 6 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.4
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" North South Cul-De-Sac Rdwy
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 1000 /lf $160.00 $160,000
Total $160,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $56,000
Grand Total $216,000
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.4 - North 12" to NAPOTS Page 7 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.5
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" Central North Loop (Cul-de-sac to Metro Air Parkway) Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 2700 /lf $160.00 $432,000
12" D Main Tie to Existing 30" Main 2 ea $35,000.00 $70,000 Total $502,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $175,700
Grand Total $677,700
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.5 - Middle North 12" Page 8 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.6
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" ASI Drive Central Segment
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 2300 /lf $160.00 $368,000
Total $368,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $128,800
Grand Total $496,800
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.6 - ASI Central 12" Page 9 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.7
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" Metro Air Parkway Segment
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 700 /lf $160.00 $112,000
Total $112,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $39,200
Grand Total $151,200
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.7 - Map Parkway 12" Page 10 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
W2.8
On-site Water Distribution Main
12" Westerly Loop (Parcel 1)
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
12" Dia. Water 5700 /lf $160.00 $912,000
Total $912,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $319,200
Grand Total $1,231,200
2024-CIP-Water Unit Costs Ver 3.1
W2.8 - West 12" North Loop Page 11 of 11
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025

7. Drainage CIP Estimate Detail
A. Drainage Detailed Summary
B. Drainage Base Unit Prices
C. Drainage Estimate Sheets
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Summary of Improvements (CIP)
Trunk Drain Summary
Project Segment Descrption Total
Project
Costs
On-site Drainage
Trunk Drainage
D1.1 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northwest Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System $1,482,759 D1.2 Detention Basin -NorthPoint South Detention Basin, Weir, Access Roads & Low Flow System $9,516,501 D1.3 Detention Basin -NorthPoint North Central Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System $1,442,006 D1.4 Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northeast Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System $905,314 D1.5 Detention Basin -Ciocca Note this is a placeholder for future estimates TBD D1.6 Detention Basin -North 4 NAPOTS Parcels Note this is a placeholder for future estimates TBD D1.7 DB Gravity Connection Under RD 1000 L Drain Gravity Connection from NE DB to the PS Under L Drain $524,300 D1.8 ASI Drainage Pump Station 35-CFS Drainage Pump Station $5,832,000 D3.1 On-Site Trunk Drainage -ASI Drive West 42" / 48" Drain Pipe $869,535 D3.2 Trunk Drainage Metro Air Parkway / Comm 36", 42", 60" Drain Pipe $1,460,228 D3.3 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive Central 36", 42", 48" Drain Pipe $1,180,136 D3.4 Trunk Drainage ASI Drive East 36", 48" Drain Pipe $1,304,370 D4.1 NorthPoiint Lands Site Import Material for CLOMR / Site Import Material $6,596,357 On-site Total $31,113,504
Off-Site Drainage
Off-site Total $0
Grand Total $31,113,504
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
CIP Trunk Drain-Summary Page 1 of 15
Prepared By:

Wood Rodgers Inc
Printed 5/31/2024
Airport Souoth Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
Item Unit 2023 Estimated
Unit Cost
Trunk Drain
36" Drain Pipe /lf $ 221.00
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf $ 231.00
36" Sluice Gate /ea $ 9,800.00
42" Drain Pipe /lf $ 283.00
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf $ 293.00
42" Sluice Gate /ea $ 12,800.00
48" Drain Pipe /lf $ 346.00
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf $ 356.00
48" Sluice Gate /ea $ 15,800.00
54" Drain Pipe /lf $ 409.00
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) /lf $ 419.00
54" Sluice Gate /ea $ 18,800.00
60" Drain Pipe /lf $ 472.00
72" Drain Pipe /lf $ 535.00
Junction Box /ea $ 45,000.00
48" Manhole /ea $ 11,900.00
60" Manhole /ea $ 17,900.00
72" Manhole /ea $ 25,000.00
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) /lf $ 2,000.00
Saddle Manhole /ea $ 15,900.00
Site Import (incl. placement and compaction) /cy $ 15.00 Lake Detention
Clear and Grub /ac $ 525.00
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) /cy $ 6.00
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) /lf $ 120.00
Basin Pipe Low Flow System /lf $ 130.00
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) /lf $ 130.00
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) /ea $ 65,000.00
Outfall Riprap Protection /ea $ 4,200.00
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe /ea $ 4,200.00
Erosion Control /sf $ 0.05
Connecting Pipe (36") /lf $ 221.00
Access Ramp /ea $ 30,000.00
Hydroseed Finish Grade /sf $ 0.15
Pump Station
Drainage Pump Station /cfs $ 120,000.00
RD 1000
Clear and Grub /ac $ 3,000.00
Wet Excavation /cy $ 15.00
Erosion Control /sf $ 0.10
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) /lf $ 130.00
Biological Observation /day $ 1,600.00
84" Culvert Installation /lf $ 1,500.00
Cofferdam & Pumping for Culvert Installation /job $ 30,000.00 Inlet / Outlet Headwalls and Armor /ea $ 39,000.00
Pavement Replacement (Power Linie Road) /job $ 35,000.00 Traffic Control (Power Liine Road) /job $ 25,000.00
Site Import
Site Import (incl. placement and compaction) /cy $ 15.00 35% Contingency & Engineering 35%
Note: Drain pipe costs include $20 / lf for dewatering. 2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
Drain-Base Unit Prices Page 2 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.1
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northwest
Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 7 /ac $525.00 $3,449
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 56,200 /cy $6.00 $337,200 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 1,050 /lf $120.00 $126,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 1,150 /lf $130.00 $149,500
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 2,650 /lf $130.00 $344,500 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 286,250 /sf $0.05 $15,028
Connecting Pipe (36") 225 /lf $221.00 $49,725
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 286,250 /sf $0.15 $42,938
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
Sub-Total $1,098,340
35% Contingency & Engineering $384,419
Grand Total $1,482,759
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.1 NP-NW DB Page 3 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.2
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint South
Detention Basin, Weir, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 48 /ac $525.00 $25,310
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 438,400 /cy $6.00 $2,630,400 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 6,600 /lf $120.00 $792,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 8,000 /lf $130.00 $1,040,000 12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 14,500 /lf $130.00 $1,885,000 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 1 /ea $65,000.00 $65,000 Erosion Control 2,100,000 /sf $0.05 $110,250
Connecting Pipe (36") 300 /lf $221.00 $66,300
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 2,100,000 /sf $0.15 $315,000
Junction Box 2 /ea $45,000.00 $90,000
Sub-Total $7,049,260
35% Contingency & Engineering $2,467,241
Grand Total $9,516,501
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.2 NP -S DB Page 4 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.3
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint North Central
Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 8 /ac $525.00 $3,977
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 72,500 /cy $6.00 $435,000 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 550 /lf $120.00 $66,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 2,300 /lf $130.00 $299,000 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 330,000 /sf $0.05 $17,325
Connecting Pipe (36") 350 /lf $221.00 $77,350
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 330,000 /sf $0.15 $49,500
Junction Box 2 /ea $45,000.00 $90,000
Sub-Total $1,068,152
35% Contingency & Engineering $373,853
Grand Total $1,442,006
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.3 NP -N Central DB Page 5 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.4
Drainage
Detention Basin -NorthPoint Northeast
Detention Basin, Access Roads & Low Flow System
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 5 /ac $525.00 $2,363
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 34,800 /cy $6.00 $208,800 Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 500 /lf $120.00 $60,000 Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 1,850 /lf $130.00 $240,500 Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 196,250 /sf $0.05 $10,303
Connecting Pipe (36") 200 /lf $221.00 $44,200
Access Ramp 1 /ea $30,000.00 $30,000
Hydroseed Finish Grade 196,250 /sf $0.15 $29,438
Junction Box 1 /ea $45,000.00 $45,000
Sub-Total $670,603
35% Contingency & Engineering $234,711
Grand Total $905,314
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.4 NP -NE DB Page 6 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.5
Drainage
Detention Basin -Ciocca
Note this is a placeholder for future estimates
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 0 /ac $525.00 $0
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 0 /cy $6.00 $0
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 0 /lf $120.00 $0
Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 0 /lf $130.00 $0
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 0 /sf $0.05 $0
Connecting Pipe (36") 0 /lf $221.00 $0
Access Ramp 0 /ea $30,000.00 $0
Hydroseed Finish Grade 0 /sf $0.15 $0
Junction Box /ea $45,000.00 $0
Sub-Total $0
35% Contingency & Engineering $0
Grand Total TBD
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.5 NP -Ciocca DB Page 7 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.6
Drainage
Detention Basin -North 4 NAPOTS Parcels
Note this is a placeholder for future estimates
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 0 /ac $525.00 $0
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 0 /cy $6.00 $0
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 0 /lf $120.00 $0
Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 0 /lf $130.00 $0
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 0 /sf $0.05 $0
Connecting Pipe (36") 0 /lf $221.00 $0
Access Ramp 0 /ea $30,000.00 $0
Hydroseed Finish Grade 0 /sf $0.15 $0
Junction Box /ea $45,000.00 $0
35% Contingency & Engineering $0
Grand Total TBD
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.6 N Central 4 Out Parcels DB Page 8 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.7
Drainage
DB Gravity Connection Under RD 1000 L Drain
Gravity Connection from NE DB to the PS Under L Drain
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 70 /lf $221.00 $15,470
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $283.00 $0
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $346.00 $0
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 1 /ea $45,000.00 $45,000
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 1 /ea $17,900.00 $17,900
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 155 /lf $2,000.00 $310,000 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 0 /ea $4,200.00 $0
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 0 /ea $4,200.00 $0
Sub-Total $388,370
35% Contingency & Engineering $135,930
Grand Total $524,300
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.7-Gravity Conn NE DB to PS Page 9 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D1.8
Drainage
ASI Drainage Pump Station
35-CFS Drainage Pump Station
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Pump Station
Drainage Pump Station 35 /cfs $120,000.00 $4,200,000
Outfall and Outfall Structure -L-Drain 1 /ea $120,000.00 $120,000 Sub-Total $4,320,000
35% Contingency & Engineering $1,512,000
Grand Total $5,832,000
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D1.8-ASI Drain Pump Sta Page 10 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.1
Drainage
On-Site Trunk Drainage -ASI Drive West
42" / 48" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $221.00 $0
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 1500 /lf $283.00 $424,500
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 300 /lf $346.00 $103,800
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 6 /ea $17,900.00 $107,400
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $644,100
35% Contingency & Engineering $225,435
Grand Total $869,535
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.1 - Trunk Drain ASI Drive W Page 11 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.2
Drainage
Trunk Drainage Metro Air Parkway / Comm
36", 42", 60" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 550 /lf $221.00 $121,550
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 800 /lf $283.00 $226,400
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $346.00 $0
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 1100 /lf $472.00 $519,200
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 1 /ea $45,000.00 $45,000
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 9 /ea $17,900.00 $161,100
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $1,081,650
35% Contingency & Engineering $378,578
Grand Total $1,460,228
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.2 Trunk Drain MAP Pkwy Page 12 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.3
Drainage
Trunk Drainage ASI Drive Central
36", 42", 48" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 475 /lf $221.00 $104,975
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 1200 /lf $283.00 $339,600
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 700 /lf $346.00 $242,200
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 10 /ea $17,900.00 $179,000
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $874,175
35% Contingency & Engineering $305,961
Grand Total $1,180,136
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.3 Trunk Drain ASI Dr Central Page 13 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Plan
Opinion of Probable Cost
D3.2
Drainage
Trunk Drainage ASI Drive East
36", 48" Drain Pipe
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
36" Drain Pipe 1100 /lf $221.00 $243,100
36" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $231.00 $0
36" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $9,800.00 $0
42" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $283.00 $0
42" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $293.00 $0
42" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $12,800.00 $0
48" Drain Pipe 1600 /lf $346.00 $553,600
48" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $356.00 $0
48" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $15,800.00 $0
54" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $409.00 $0
54" Fusion Welded HDPE (Outfall) 0 /lf $419.00 $0
54" Sluice Gate 0 /ea $18,800.00 $0
60" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $472.00 $0
72" Drain Pipe 0 /lf $535.00 $0
Junction Box 0 /ea $45,000.00 $0
48" Manhole 0 /ea $11,900.00 $0
60" Manhole 9 /ea $17,900.00 $161,100
72" Manhole 0 /ea $25,000.00 $0
Bore and Jack (Incl. carrier casing) 0 /lf $2,000.00 $0 Saddle Manhole 0 /ea $15,900.00 $0
Outfall Riprap Protection 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200
Concrete Headwall @ Outfall Pipe 1 /ea $4,200.00 $4,200 Sub-Total $966,200
35% Contingency & Engineering $338,170
Grand Total $1,304,370
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D3.4 Trunk Drain ASI Dr East Page 14 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Printed 5/31/2024
Airport South Industrial
Capital Improvement Program
Opinion of Probable Cost
D4.1
Drainage
NorthPoiint Lands Site Import Material for CLOMR / LOMR Site Import Material
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Detention Basin
Clear and Grub 300 /ac $525.00 $157,500
Basin Excavation (includes Dewatering) 0 /cy $6.00 $0
Basin Low Flow Channel (8-feet wide) 0 /lf $120.00 $0
Basin Pipe Low Flow System 0 /lf $130.00 $0
12" AB Access Road (12-feet wide) 0 /lf $130.00 $0
Weir to RD 1000 Canal (50-feet wide) 0 /ea $65,000.00 $0 Erosion Control 4,356,000 /sf $0.05 $228,690
Connecting Pipe (36") 0 /lf $221.00 $0
Access Ramp 0 /ea $30,000.00 $0
Hydroseed Finish Grade 0 /sf $0.15 $0
Site Import (incl. placement and compaction) 300,000 /cy $15.00 $4,500,000 Note: Potential Import for NAPOTS Parcels not included.

Sub-Total $4,886,190
35% Contingency & Engineering $1,710,167
Grand Total $6,596,357
2024-ASI-CIP- Drain Unit Costs Ver 3.1
D4.1 Site Import Page 15 of 15
Prepared by:

Wood Rodgers Inc.

Airport South Industrial Park
Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure Estimates Version 3.4
June 2025
End of CIP
APPENDIX B:

Airport South Industrial Estimated
Fee Revenue from Existing and
Proposed Fee Programs
Table B-1 Estimated Fee Revenue
DRAFT
Table B-1
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Fee Revenue (2024$)
Item
Applicant
Sponsored
Future
Industrial
Highway
Commercial Total
Building Square Feet 4,688,440 949,064 80,940 5,718,444 Processing Fees $11,494,114 $2,353,441 $275,224 $14,122,779 City Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) $6,139,972 $1,234,084 $92,246 $7,466,301 Water Development Fee $1,815,968 $479,813 $206,570 $2,502,352 Water Easement Tap Installation $135,022 $35,675 $15,359 $186,057 Water Meter Installation $88,374 $23,350 $10,053 $121,776 City Business Operations Tax $117,800 $31,125 $5,740 $154,665 Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) $35,340 $9,338 $2,144 $46,822 Neighborhood and Community Parks $797,035 $161,341 $32,376 $990,752 Citywide Parks $234,422 $47,453 $12,950 $294,826
Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $4,266,480 $863,648 $215,300 $5,345,429 Subtotal City Development Impact Fees $13,630,413 $2,885,827 $592,738 $17,108,978 Other Agency Fees
Natomas Unified School District $3,656,983 $740,270 $63,133 $4,460,386 Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $11,290,609 $3,818,747 $726,942 $15,836,298 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $5,438,590 $1,100,914 $93,890 $6,633,394 Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $1,847,245 $373,931 $191,180 $2,412,357 SacSewer Sewage Collection Impact Fees [1] $6,182,380 $1,633,502 $351,629 $8,167,511 SacSewer Sewage Treatment Impact Fees [2] $3,037,640 $614,898 $52,441 $3,704,980 Subtotal Other Agency Fees $31,453,447 $8,282,262 $1,479,217 $41,214,926 ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fees
Roadways $24,419,704 $6,452,150 $1,388,897 $32,260,751
Sewer $1,047,242 $276,701 $59,563 $1,383,506
Water $2,380,031 $628,850 $135,367 $3,144,248
Storm Drainage $4,811,423 $1,271,270 $273,655 $6,356,348 Administration $979,860 $258,898 $55,731 $1,294,489
Subtotal $33,638,261 $8,887,868 $1,913,212 $44,439,341
ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee $2,915,786 $770,406 $165,838 $3,852,030 ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee $510,599 $134,910 $29,041 $674,550 ASI North Natomas DA Fee
Fire $1,334,910 $352,709 $75,924 $1,763,543
Transit $370,128 $97,795 $21,051 $488,974
Subtotal $1,705,037 $450,503 $96,976 $2,252,516
Total Estimated Fee Revenue $95,347,658 $23,765,217 $4,552,245 $123,665,121 Source: City of Sacramento; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] Formerly known as SASD Fee.
[2] Formerly known as Regional San Fee.

Warehouse
Prepared by EPS 10/20/2025 C:\222100 Ceres Copper Trails Specific Plan\222006 Airport South FP 10.20.25.xlsx APPENDIX C:

Airport South Industrial and
Metro Air Park Financial
Feasibility Comparison
Table C-1 Cost Burden Comparison per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Table C-2 Total Cost Burden Comparison for
240,000 Sq. Ft. Building
Table C-3 Estimated Cost Burden per
1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.—ASI
Table C-4 Estimated Cost Burden per
1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.—Metro Air Park
Table C-5 Estimated Taxes and Assessments per
1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Table C-6 Estimated Taxes and Assessments from
FY 2023-24 Tax Bill—Metro Air Park
DRAFT
Table C-1
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Cost Burden Comparison per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$)
Item
ASI [1] MAP Difference
Source Table C-3 Table C-4
Assumptions (acres and building square feet based on Metro Air Park Building 6) Total Net Developable Acres 18.17 18.17
Total Building Square Feet 240,000 240,000
FAR 0.30 0.30
Building Permit Processing Fees $2,436 $1,718 $718
City/County/Other Agency Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) $1,315 - $1,315 Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee - MAP - $970 ($970) Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $394 $394 - City Water $361 - $361
SCWA Zone 50 (Water Development) - $1,272 ($1,272)
SacSewer Collection $1,987 $1,987 -
SacSewer Treatment $648 $648 -
City Parks Impact Fee $220 - $220
City Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $910 - $910 County Very Low Affordable Housing Trust Fund - $1,060 ($1,060) Miscellaneous $27 - $27
Natomas Unified School District $780 $780 -
Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $3,483 $3,483 - Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $1,160 $1,160 - Subtotal City/County Fees $11,284 $11,754 ($469)
Plan Area Fees
Development Impact Fees $10,809 $4,569 $6,240
Less Frontage [2] ($3,697) - ($3,697)
Net Development Impact Fees without Frontage $7,112 $4,569 $2,543 ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee $937 - $937
ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee $164 - $164
ASI North Natomas DA Fee $548 - $548
Subtotal Plan Area Fees $8,761 $4,569 $4,192
Total Fees $22,481 $18,041 $4,441
Less CFD Bond Proceeds [3] ($6,912) ($6,451) ($461)
Total Fees per 1,000 Building Square Feet Net of Bond Proceeds $15,570 $11,590 $3,980 Total Fees per Building Square Foot Net of Bond Proceeds $15.57 $11.59 $3.98 Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] The ASI fees exclude the ASI North Natomas DA fees that will apply to the ASI project. These fees are parallel to certain fees contained in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as updated. [2] Frontage portion of fee estimated below:

Total Cost: $43,144,715
Frontage Cost: $14,756,442
Frontage Pct. of ASI Fee: 34%
Estimated Frontage Fee: $3,697
[3] ASI bond proceeds per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. = Total bond proceeds per acre/bldg. sq. ft. per acre*1.000.

See Table 4-4 for bond proceeds per acre. MAP bond proceeds per acre estimated as 93% of ASI bond proceeds per acre based on the ratio of special tax rates per acre ($7,000-MAP/$7,500-ASI).

Fee per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Prepared by EPS 10/17/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 10.17.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-2
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Total Cost Burden Comparison for 240,000 Sq. Ft. Building (2024$) Item
ASI MAP Difference
Total Building Square Feet 240,000 240,000
Building Permit Processing Fees $584,598 $412,297 $172,301 City/County/Other Agency Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) $315,550 - $315,550 Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee - MAP - $232,800 ($232,800) Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $94,560 $94,560 - City Water $86,560 - $86,560
SCWA Zone 50 (Water Development) - $305,227 ($305,227)
SacSewer Collection $476,799 $476,799 -
SacSewer Treatment $155,496 $155,496 -
City Parks Impact Fee $52,800 - $52,800
City Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $218,400 - $218,400 County Very Low Affordable Housing Trust Fund - $254,400 ($254,400) Miscellaneous $6,500 - $6,500
Natomas Unified School District $187,200 $187,200 -
Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $835,984 $835,984 - Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $278,400 $278,400 - Subtotal City/County Fees $2,708,249 $2,820,866 ($112,617) Plan Area Fees
Development Impact Fees $2,594,258 $1,096,669 $1,497,590 Less Frontage ($887,293) - ($887,293)
Net Development Impact Fees without Frontage $1,706,965 $1,096,669 $610,296 ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee $224,872 - $224,872 ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee $39,379 - $39,379
ASI North Natomas DA Fee $131,496 - $131,496
Subtotal Plan Area Fees $2,102,712 $1,096,669 $1,006,043 Total Fees $5,395,559 $4,329,831 $1,065,728
Less CFD Bond Proceeds ($1,658,855) ($1,548,265) ($110,590) Total Fees Revenue Net of Bond Proceeds $3,736,703 $2,781,566 $955,137 Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS Total Fee Revenue
Prepared by EPS 10/20/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 10.20.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-3
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Cost Burden per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$) - ASI Item Warehouse Notes
Assumptions Acres and bldg. sq. ft. set equal to values for Metro Air Parkway Building 6.

ICC Group F-2
ICC Construction Type IIB
Valuation per Building Square Foot $137.64 February 2024 Total Gross Acres 18.17
Total Net Developable Acres 18.17
Total Building Square Feet 240,000
Project Valuation $33,033,600
2002 Building plus Equipment Valuations
Building Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft.- Type I or II Fire Resistant $49.40 Air Conditioning Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft. $4.20
Sprinklers Valuation per Bldg. Sq. Ft. $2.60
Total Valuation per Building Square Foot $56.20
Total Project Building and Equipment Valuation $13,488,000 Fees Current as of July 2024
per 1K Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Processing Fees
Administrative Processing Fee $1 $164 per hour, assumes 1 hour review Building Permit $680 $56,692 + $0.00462 *$ over $10 M;$20,761 + $0.005133 * $ over $3 M Technology Surcharge $54 8% of Building Permit
Plan Review Fee $596 $16,970 + $0.0042 for each dollar over $3 Million Technology Surcharge $48 8% of Plan Review Fee
Planning Projects Fee $89 15% of Plan Review Fee
Planning Inspection Fee $6 $1,344 flat rate; charged when Planning Division performs inspections.

Seismic/Strong Motion $39 $0.00028*building valuation ($0.50 min) General Plan Recovery Fee $358 $2.60 per $1,000 of bldg. valuation Green Building/CBSC Fee $6 $1 per $25,000 of bldg. valuation or fraction, thereof Construction Excise Tax $450 0.008 * 2002 building valuation Fire Inspection Fee $110 $0.11 per bldg. sq. ft.

Fire Plan Review Fee $1 $145 per hour, assumes 1 hour review Subtotal Processing Fees $2,436
City Development Impact Fees
Sacramento City Transportation Development Impact Fee $1,315 $0.13 per sq. ft. for first 5,000 sq. ft.; $1.34 per sq. ft. for 5,001+ sq. ft.

Water Development Fee $321 Assumes 1 3" domestic meter ($55,163.58) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($21,914.87) Water Easement Tap Installation (connection) [1] $24 Assumes 1 4" domestic meter ($3,158) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($2,573) Water Meter Installation $16 Assumes 1 3" domestic meter ($2,723) and 1 2" irrigation meter ($1,028) City Business Operations Tax $21 $0.0004 per $1 of bldg. valuation; Max. $5,000/year/contractor Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) $6 Payable at grading permit.

Neighborhood and Community Parks $170
Citywide Parks $50
Mixed Income Housing Ordinance/Housing Trust Fund $910 $0.91 per sq. ft.

Subtotal City Development Impact Fees $2,833
Other Agency Fees
Natomas Unified School District $780 $0.78 per area sq. ft. (effective 10/26/2023) Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $3,483 $46,009 per gross acre at grading permit; fee without land dedication Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $1,160 $1.16 per habitable area sq. ft.(effective 7/01/2020) Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $394 $394 per 1,000 sq. ft.; effective 7/1/2024; warehouse fee SacSewer Sewage Collection Impact Fees $1,987 $26,241 per net acre (effective 7/1/24); formerly SASD SacSewer Sewage Treatment Impact Fees $648 $6,479 per ESD; 5 ESDs per 50,0000 sq. ft. (effective 7/1/24); formerly SRCSD Subtotal Other Agency Fees $8,452
ASI Backbone Infrastructure DA Fees [2]
Roadways $7,847 $103,649 per net developable acre
Sewer $337 $4,445 per net developable acre
Water $765 $10,102 per net developable acre
Storm Drainage $1,546 $20,422 per net developable acre
Administration $315 3% of all other ASI Development Impact Fees; $4,159 per net developable acre Subtotal $10,809
ASI Specific Plan Reimbursement DA Fee [2] $937 $6,926 per net developable acre ASI Public Land Acquisition DA Fee [2] $164 $2,167 per net developable acre ASI North Natomas DA Fee [3]
Fire $429 $5,666 per net developable acre
Transit $119 $1,571 per net developable acre
Subtotal $548
Total Fees $26,179
Source: City of Sacramento; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] Fee for 3" meter not available so used fee for 4" meter. [2] These fees will be charged per net developable acre. Fess shown per 1,000 bldg. sq. ft. for purposes of cost burden. [3] Usual 3% City administrative fee does not apply to these fees.

Prepared by EPS 10/20/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 10.20.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-4
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Cost Burden per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$) - Metro Air Park Item Warehouse Notes
Assumptions
ICC Group F-2
ICC Construction Type IIB
Valuation per Building Square Foot $137.64 February 2024 Total Gross Acres 18.17 Metro Air Parkway Building 6
Total Net Developable Acres 18.17
Total Building Sq. Ft. 240,000
Project Valuation $33,033,600
Fees Current as of July 2024
per 1K Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Processing Fees
Building Permit $815 60% of $228,680.66+.007418*(valuation-$20,000,000)/bldg. sq. ft.*1,000 Plan Review Fee $543 40% of $228,680.66+.007418*(valuation-$20,000,000)/bldg. sq. ft.*1,000 Zone Check Fee $71 13% of plan review fee
Seismic/Strong Motion $39 $0.00028*building valuation ($0.50 min) California Building Standards Commission Fee (Green Fee) $6 $1 per $25,000 of bldg. valuation or fraction, thereof Business Environmental Resource Center $34 0.025% of valuation Long Range Planning Fee $95 7% of total of building permit and plan review fee.

IT Cost Recovery Fee $1 4.5% of application fee with $350 maximum.

Fire Inspection Fee $110 $0.11 per bldg. sq. ft.; City fire department fee.

Fire Plan Review Fee $1 $145 per hour, assumes 1 hour review; City fire department fee.

Waste Management Plan Fee $3 $0.04 per $100 construction value; max. of $800 Subtotal Processing Fees $1,718
County Development Impact Fees
Very Low Affordable Housing Trust Fund $1,060 warehouse; $1.06 per square foot; effective 3/28/2024 Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee $970 effective 4/15/2024; warehouse fee; includes transportation, transit, & admin.

Sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee $394 $394 per 1,000 sq. ft.; effective 7/1/2024; warehouse fee.

Subtotal County Development Impact Fees $2,424
Other Agency Fees [1]
Natomas Unified School District $780 $0.78 per area sq. ft. (effective 10/26/2023) Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee $3,483 $46,009 per gross acre at grading permit; fee without land dedication Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Dev. Impact Fee $1,160 $1.16 per habitable area sq. ft. (effective 7/01/2020).

SacSewer Sewage Collection Impact Fees [2] $1,987 $26,241 per net acre (effective 7/1/24) SacSewer Sewage Treatment Impact Fees [3] $648 $6,479 per ESD; 5 ESDs per 50,0000 sq. ft. (effective 7/1/24) RD-1000 Drainage - MAP assumed to be exempt.

SCWA Zone 50 - Acreage $1,205 $15,920 per acre; eff. 4/1/23 SCWA Zone 50 - Connection $2 $376 per connection
SCWA Zone 50 - Domestic Water Service $43 $1,143 per EDU; 1 3" domestic meter; 9 EDUs per meter.

SCWA Zone 50 - Irrigation Connection $2 $376 per connection SCWA Zone 50 - Irrigation Water Service $19 $1,143 per EDU; 1 2" irrigation meter; 4 EDUs per meter.

SCWA IT Recovery Fee $1 $350 flat fee
Subtotal Other Agency Fees $9,330
MAP Plan Area Fees [4] $4,569 Zone 2 -Airport Distribution and Manufacturing; $60,356 per net acre Total Fees per 1,000 Building Square Feet $18,041
Source: City of Sacramento; Other Agency Fee Programs; EPS [1] It is assumed that MAP does not participate in the SCWA Zone 11 drainage fee program. [2] Formerly known as SASD Fee.
[3] Formerly known as Regional San Fee.
[4] These fees will be charged per net developable acre.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-5Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance PlanEstimated Taxes and Assessments per 1,000 Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2024$)Item Percentage Taxes per 1,000
Bldg. Sq. Ft. Notes
Assumptions
TRA 95-003Parcel Size (acres) 18.17Parcel Size (sq. ft.) 791,485.20Building Square Feet 240,000 Assessed Value per 1,000 Building Square Foot (2024$) $134,152Ad Valorem Property Taxes General Property Tax 1.0000% $1,342Natomas Unified GOB 0.1560% $209Los Rios College GOB 0.0192% $26Total Ad Valorem Taxes 1.1752% $1,577 Estimated City/Regional Special Taxes/Assessments
SAFCA Consolidated Capital Assessment District #2 [1] $42 set equal to MAP amounts.

SAFCA AD No.1 - O&M Assessment [1] $3 set equal to MAP amounts.SAFCA Natomas Basin Local Assessment District [1] $15 set equal to MAP amounts.City of Sacramento Core Library Services Tax $1 $22.91 per acre for first 5 acres; $5.73 for each additional acreCity of Sacramento Additional Library Services Tax $2 $58.84 per acre for first 5 acres; $14.72 for each additional acre City of Sacramento AD L & L $8 $1,880.14 per parcel for parcels >100,000 sq. ft.Reclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Assessment $5 $0.03 per $100 valuation*$23,000 per acreReclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Fee $21 $328.73 per impervious acre * 0.86 impervious factorTotal Estimated Special Annual Taxes/Assessments $97 Estimated Airport South Maintenance CFD $219 $2,886 per net acre Estimated Airport South Infrastructure CFD $568 $7,500 per net acreTotal Annual Taxes and Assessments $2,460 Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; EPS.

Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx DRAFT
Table C-6
Airport South Industrial Public Facilities Finance Plan Estimated Taxes and Assessments from FY 2023-24 Tax Bill - Metro Air Park Item Percentage
per 1,000
Bldg. Sq. Ft. Total
Assumptions
APN 201-1020-151
TRA 95-016
Parcel Size (acres) 18.17
Building Square Feet 240,000
Assessed Value (2024$) $134,152 $32,196,514
Ad Valorem Property Taxes
General Property Tax 1.0000% $1,342 $321,965
Natomas Unified GOB 0.1560% $209 $50,227
Los Rios College GOB 0.0192% $26 $6,182
Subtotal 1.1752% $1,577 $378,373
County and Regional Direct Levies [1]
SAFCA Consolidated Capital Assessment District #2 $42 $10,029 SAFCA AD No.1 - O&M Assessment $3 $674
SAFCA Natomas Basin Local Assessment District $15 $3,539 Reclamation District No. 1000 Stormwater Service Fee $22 $5,173 Reclamation District No. 1000 $4 $1,003
Water and Drainage Studies - SCWA 13 $1 $251
CSA 1 Lights Sac Unicorp Zone 1 $0 $3
Subtotal $86 $20,672
Metro Air Park CFD 2000-1 Services $23 $5,508
Metro Air Park CFD 2000-1 Facility $528 $126,774
Total Annual Taxes and Assessments $2,214 $531,327
Source: City of Sacramento; Sacramento County; EPS.
[1] From property tax bill for FY 2023-24.

Property Taxes [1]
Prepared by EPS 7/7/2025 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222006 Sacramento Northpointe Annexation Public\Models\222006 Airport South FP 7.1.25.xlsx RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
December 2, 2025

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS (P21-017)

BACKGROUND
A. On June 26, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on, and forwarded to the City Council its recommendation for approval of the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, and
B. On November 18, 2025 & December 2, 2025, after giving notice as required by Sacramento City Code section 17.812.010 (2)(b), the City Council conducted public hearings on the Project, receiving and considering evidence concerning it.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, the City Council approves the Project entitlements based on the findings of fact and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below.

Section 2 The City Council approves the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project entitlements based on the following Findings of Fact:

C. The Tentative Master Parcel Map to subdivide ±352 acres into 25 master parcels in the Light Industrial Planned Unit Development (M-1-PUD), Highway Commercial Planned Unit Development (HC-PUD), and within the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development (PUD) is approved based on the following Findings of Fact:

1. None of the conditions described in Government Code Section 66474, subsection (a) through (g), inclusive, exist with respect to the proposed subdivision as follows:
a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code;
b. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code;
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development; d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development;
e. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as explained in the Environmental Impact Report;
f. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

2. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the City General Plan and Title 17 Subdivisions of the City Code, which is a specific plan of the City (Gov.

Code §66473.5);

3. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in a violation of the applicable waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Region, in that existing treatment plants have a design capacity adequate to service the proposed subdivision (Gov. code §66474.6);

4. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities (Gov. Code §66473.1);

5. The City Council has considered the effect of the approval of this Tentative Master Parcel Map on the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code §66412.3).

D. 200-Year Flood Protection Finding Consistent with State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code Section 17.810:

1. State Law (SB 5 as amended by SB 639) and the Planning and Development Code chapter 17.810 require that the City must make specific findings prior to approving certain entitlements for projects within a flood hazard zone. The purpose is to ensure that new development in the Natomas and Beach Lake Subareas will have protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2030. The project site is within a flood hazard zone and is an area covered by SAFCA’s Improvements to the State Plan of Flood Control System, and specific findings related to the level of protection have been incorporated as part of this project. Even though the project site is within a flood hazard zone, the local flood management agency, SAFCA, has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system that will ensure protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2030. This is based on the SAFCA Urban level of flood protection plan, adequate progress baseline report, and adequate progress toward an urban level of flood protection engineer’s report that were accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2016-0226 on June 21, 2016 and the SAFCA 2025 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2025-0282 on October 21, 2025
C. The Tentative Master Parcel Map to subdivide ±352 acres into 25 master parcels in the Light Industrial Planned Unit Development (M-1-PUD), Highway Commercial Planned Unit Development (HC-PUD), and within the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development (PUD) is approved subject to the following Conditions of Approval:

NOTE: These conditions shall supersede any contradictory information shown on the Tentative Master Parcel Map or any contradictory provisions in the PUD guidelines approved for this project (P21-017). The design of any improvement not covered by these conditions or the PUD Guidelines shall be to City standard.

The applicant shall satisfy each of the following conditions prior to filing of any phased Final Map unless a different time for compliance is specifically stated in these conditions. Any condition requiring an improvement that has already been designed and secured under a City Approved improvement agreement may be considered satisfied at the discretion of the Department of Public Works.

The City strongly encourages the applicant to thoroughly discuss the conditions of approval for the project with their Engineer/Land Surveyor consultants prior to City Planning Commission approval. The improvements required of a Tentative Map can be costly and are completely dependent upon the condition of the existing improvements. Careful evaluation of the potential cost of the improvements required by the City will enable the applicant to ask questions of the City prior to project approval and will result in a smoother plan check process after project approval:

Public Works: Anis Ghobril, (916) 808-5367
C1. Execute a Development Agreement to the satisfaction of the City of Sacramento and comply with and meet all the requirements of the Agreement.

C2. Comply with requirements included in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan developed by, and kept on file in, the Planning Division Office (P21-017).

C3. The applicant shall create and participate in the Airport South Industrial Finance Plan and pay all appropriate fees to the satisfaction of the Department of Finance.

C4. Title to any property required to be dedicated to the City in fee shall be conveyed free and clear of all rights, restrictions, easements, impediments, encumbrances, liens, taxes, assessments or other security interests of any kind (hereafter collectively referred to as "Encumbrances"), except as provided herein. The applicant shall take all actions necessary to remove any and all Encumbrances prior to approval of the Final Map and acceptance of the dedication by City, except that the applicant shall not be required to remove Encumbrances of record, including but not limited to easements or rights-of-way for public roads or public utilities, which, in the sole and exclusive judgment of the City, cannot be removed and/or would not interfere with the City's future use of the property.

The applicant shall provide title insurance with the City as the named beneficiary assuring the conveyance of such title to City.

C5. Show all existing and proposed/required easements on the Final Map.

C6. Multiple Final Maps may be recorded. Prior to recordation of any Final Map all infrastructure/improvements necessary for the respective Final Map must be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Utilities, Planning Division, and the Department of Public Works.

C7. Submit a Geotechnical Analysis prepared by a registered engineer to be used in street design. The analysis shall identify and recommend solutions for groundwater related problems, which may occur within both the subdivision lots and public right-of-way.

Construct appropriate facilities to alleviate those problems. As a result of the analysis street sections shall be designed to provide for stabilized subgrades and pavement sections under high groundwater conditions.

C8. Multiple access points will be required for all phases of the Final Parcel Map to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Dead end streets must be less than 500' in length and must include a turn-around approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department.

C9. Provide additional right-of-way for expanded intersections at intersections to be signalized and other locations specified by the Department of Public Works.

C10. The applicant shall provide a signing and striping improvement plan if new signage or striping is proposed; or if existing signing and/or striping is removed or relocated. The plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C11. All right-of-way and street improvement transitions that result from changing the right-ofway of any street shall be located, designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The center lines of such streets shall be aligned.

C12. The design and placement of walls, fences, signs and Landscaping near intersections and driveways shall allow stopping sight distance per Caltrans standards and comply with City Code Section 12.28.010 (25' sight triangle). Walls shall be set back 3' behind the sight line needed for stopping sight distance to allow sufficient room for pilasters.

Landscaping in the area required for adequate stopping sight distance shall be limited to

3.5' in height. The area of exclusion shall be determined by the Department of Public Works.

C13. The applicant shall install permanent street signs to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

C14. The applicant shall make provisions for bus stops, shelters, bus turnouts, etc. to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works in consultation with Regional Transit.

C15. The applicant shall dedicate and construct Airport South Industrial Drive (ASI Drive) as a modified Local Industrial Street section as shown on the approved tentative map per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C16. The applicant shall design and construct two canal crossings (bridge/culverts) along ASI Drive. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from RD1000 and any other affected agencies and construct the canal crossings to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C17. The applicant shall coordinate with the County of Sacramento to utilize existing right of way along Power Line Road and construct a southbound left turn pocket onto eastbound ASI Drive. Widening of Power Line Road at ASI Drive to accommodate the left turn pocket shall provide for all needed roadway transitions (north and south of ASI Drive) per the CA MUTCD/HDM and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall relocate any existing utilities or power lines to accommodate the installation of the left turn pocket to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C18. The applicant shall construct curb returns with increased curb radius and taper at the intersection of ASI Drive and Power Line Road and at the intersection of Metro Air Parkway and ASI Drive to accommodate a WB-67 design vehicle/truck ensuring that trucks can turn without conflicting with opposing lanes to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C19. The applicant shall dedicate and construct the segment of Metro Air Parkway within the boundary of this tentative map as a 4-lane arterial roadway. Metro Air Parkway will be constructed with an expanded intersection at the proposed signalized commercial driveways consistent with the street section shown on the approved tentative map per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Any interim Roadway Transitions (Roadway, sidewalks, bike lanes, etc.) shall be designed and constructed per the CA MUTCD/HDM standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C20. Provide slope easements and additional right-of-way, if necessary, for Metro Air Parkway and any canal crossings to the satisfaction of the Departments of Public Works and Utilities.

C21. Dedicate and construct A Drive and B Drive per the street sections shown on the approved tentative map per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C22. The applicant shall construct the segment of Bayou Road from B Drive to A Drive as a one-way roadway heading from west to east consistent with the street section shown on the approved tentative map to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall provide all needed signage and pavement marking indicating a one-way street to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C23. Construct traffic signals at the following intersections when warranted or with any phased final map creating the commercial parcels (if not already in place):
a. Metro Air Parkway and Highway Commercial driveways.

NOTE: The Department of Public Works shall determine the need for signals, based on Caltrans signal warrants and known pending development projects prior to the Issuance of any building permit. If required, signals shall be constructed as part of the public improvements for the Final Map. Signal design and construction shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall provide all on-site easements and right-of-way needed for turn lanes, signal facilities and related appurtenances. The applicant shall install CCTV cameras and all necessary appurtenances if deemed necessary by and to the satisfaction of the Transportation Division (Signal Operations Section).

C24. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Signal Design Concept Report (TSCDR) per section

15.10 of the City’s Design and Procedures Manual to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to the submittal of any improvement plans involving traffic signal work. The TSCDR provides crucial geometric information for signal design which may lead to additional right-of-way dedication and should be started as early as possible to avoid delays during the plan check process.

C25. The applicant shall dedicate sufficient right of way and construct a roundabout at the intersection of A Drive and Bayou Road per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The roundabout shall have sufficient radii to accommodate a WB-67 design vehicle/truck turning. Trucks shall be prohibited from traveling east onto Bayou Way from the roundabout. The applicant shall provide for all needed signage and pavement marking to restrict truck access to the east. The design and construction of the roundabout shall provide for all required signing plans, striping plans, street lighting plans, pedestrian crossings and islands, and landscaping plans to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C26. The applicant shall submit a roundabout design concept report to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to the submittal of any improvement plans involving the roundabout or any phased final map adjacent to the roundabout. The roundabout design concept report shall provide crucial geometric information and signage and markings package for the design of the roundabout which may lead to additional right-ofway dedication and should be started as early as possible to avoid delays during the plan check process.

C27. The proposed access easement located on the east side of Parcel 4 shall be constructed with a standard driveway along ASI Drive and gated at a minimum distance of 20-feet from the back of walk to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C28. All proposed elbows and cul-de-sacs shall be constructed per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C29. Construct A.D.A. compliant ramps per City standards at all intersections and as directed by the Department of Public Works. All crosswalks shall be disability access compliant to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

C30. Prior to recording any phased final map, the applicant shall obtain and submit all required abandonment clearance letters for any proposed abandonments within the phased map boundary and shall satisfy all conditions of approval of the abandonment.

C31. Prior to the submittal of improvement plans for any phase of this project, the developer’s design consultant(s) shall participate in a pre-design conference with City staff. The purpose of this conference is to allow City staff and the design consultants to exchange information on project design requirements and to coordinate the improvement plan review process. Contact the Department of Public Works, Development Services Section Plan Check Engineer to schedule the conference. It is strongly recommended that the conference be held as early in the design process as possible.

C32. The applicant shall initiate and complete formation of a maintenance district (either an assessment district or a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District) or annex the project to an existing maintenance and services district prior to recordation of a final master parcel map, or at the time of approval of a conditional use permit or site plan and design review permit, whichever occurs first unless a different compliance timeline is specifically stated in the condition. Additionally, the applicant is responsible for paying all city fees associated with the formation or annexation of these special districts.

C33. With each phase of the Final Master Parcel Map dedicate to the City those areas identified on that phase of the Tentative Master Parcel Map as Landscape Corridors, Freeway Buffers, and Open Space areas. Annex the project area to the appropriate Landscape Maintenance District, or other financing mechanism acceptable to the City, prior to recordation of the Final Map. Design and construct landscaping and irrigation in dedicated easements or rights of way, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, Parks Planning, Design and Development (PPDD), and the Planning Division. Acceptance of the required landscaping and irrigation by the City into the Landscape Maintenance District shall be coordinated with the Department of Public Works (Special Districts and Development Services) and PPDD. The Developer shall maintain the landscaping and irrigation for two years or until acceptance by the City into the District (whichever is less). The two-year period shall begin following the issuance of a notice of completion by the City for the landscaping and irrigation.

C34. Form a Business Owners Association (BOA). CC&R's shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of any common areas, landscape parcels, shared driveways, etc.

ELECTRICAL: John Matoba, (916) 808-7891
C35. This project will require the installation of streetlights on all public streets to the satisfaction of Public Works. This will require the electrical design plans to be prepared and stamped by a registered civil or electrical engineer submitted with the major encroachment permit application. The Developer will determine the quantity and locations of streetlights based upon the City Lighting Standards. In general, the City Lighting Standard for illumination follows the IES RP-8 guidelines: Lighting Zone 1) the illumination levels are 0.10 footcandles minimum for residential applications and Lighting Zone 2) the illumination levels are 0.20 footcandles for non-residential applications. The illumination levels for crosswalks and signalized intersections shall meet the American National Standard Institute (ANSI)/Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) RP8guidelines. A photometric analysis is required for the first Cycle submission. Residential lighting shall be the City Standard ornamental streetlights. SMUD Rate Schedule: A new metered service pedestal with SMUD service point is required for the installation of all streetlights. New streetlights cannot be connected to an unmetered service pedestal.

SMUD: Ellen Springer, (916) 732-5989
C36. SMUD has existing overhead 12/69kV facilities along Powerline Rd, Del Paso Rd, along the northside of the West Drainage Canal and Bayou Way and on the project site that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

C37. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet from the road R/W shall require the Applicant to conduct a pre-engineering meeting with SMUD to ensure property clearances are maintained.

C38. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD easement or PUE. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property.

C39. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

C40. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs.

C41. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

C42. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

C43. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors).

Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be found at:
https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Design-and-ConstructionServices C44. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD.

C45. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-of-ways.

C46. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20-foot wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15 feet from the drivable surface.

C47. The Applicant shall dedicate a 20-foot easement for future 69kV routes that will be required to connect the new substation into SMUD’s Distribution System. Associated future overhead 69kV will be installed all along Airport South Industrial Dr. from Powerline Rd to S. Bayou Way/El Centro Rd If a 12.5-foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) is also required along these streets, the 12.5-foot PUE will be located directly adjacent to the street right-of-way, with the 20-foot 69kV easement directly adjacent to the PUE.

C48. The Applicant shall disclose existing or proposed 69kV electrical facilities to future and/or potential owners.

C49. The Applicant shall designate a parcel of land for an electric substation to be acquired by SMUD with an approximate size of 250-feet by 250-feet of net useable area (approximately 62,500 square feet of net usable area). There shall be no deviations from this requirement until SMUD’s Grid Planning section evaluates design criteria for the site.

C50. The tentative location of the substation shall be on Parcel 1 or 2. It is SMUD’s preference that substations be placed in areas that are zoned Industrial or Commercial.

Prior to the Map Recordation of the final map, the exact size and location of the substation site shall be determined by mutual agreement of SMUD and the Applicant.

C51. Substation sites shall be unencumbered; the sites shall not contain jurisdictional wetlands, sensitive species, cultural resources, or hazardous wastes or materials.

C52. Lot A, B and C, Detention/Retention Basins. Please work with SMUD Design to ensure sufficient clearance for basins near the existing SMUD facilities.

C53. Lot H is situated between two basins (Lots A & B). There appears to be a pipe connecting between these two basins directly running through Lot H. Non-SMUD or third party utilities are not allowed within site, such as storm drains, water main/pipe, gas mains, vaults, ducts, pull boxes / manholes, pole risers and other existing infrastructure.

C54. See SMUD Substation General Requirements, Distribution Substation General Requirements and Planning Guide AUG 2022.

C55. Substation straight access roads must be at least 20’ wide.  If there are any turns along the access road to the substation, the road must be able to accommodate the crane and low boy trailer as specified in Pages 14 and 15 of this document.
 If the substation site is not directly adjacent to a main street right-of-way, a 24-hour access easement to the substation shall be required.  An access easement from a public road of sufficient size to accommodate the crane and trailer requirements shall be obtained.
 Substation driveway access easement shall be minimum 40’ long from ROW and shall be minimum 40’ wide.
 Driveway design shall confirm no vertical and horizontal obstructions within turning radius of heavy haul equipment trailer and crane.  Substation entrance shall accommodate service trucks and an 80-ton, 9- axle steerable heavy haul equipment trailer (low boy) with an inside turning radius of 50’-1” and an outside turning radius of 71’-4” for transformer delivery. Gate openings are typically 24’-30’ wide.  Structural sections of driveways including any crossing bike path, sidewalk, utilities and other infrastructure shall be designed to accommodate low boy trailer and 350-ton crane. Section and details shall be provided to SMUD for review and concurrence.
 In a commercial parking lot situation, a simple re-entry thru-gate with adequate turning radius and easement rights to cross and enter is sufficient.
 Crane and equipment trailer are typically permitted loads that exceed H-25 loading.

SASD: Zoe Wu, (916) 875-0283
C56. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Annexation through the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to SacSewer’s service areas will be required for sewer service.

C57. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For this project, SacSewer requires a sewer study prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer. The sewer study shall demonstrate the quantity of discharge and any “flow through sewage” along with appropriate pipe sizes and related appurtenances from this subject and other upstream areas and shall be done in accordance with SacSewers’ most recent “Minimum Sewer Study Requirements”. The study shall be in conformance with SacSewer’s most recent System Capacity Plan and done on a no “Shed-Shift” basis unless approved by SacSewer in advance and in compliance with SacSewer Design Standards.

C58. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For projects requiring a new pump station, SacSewer requires a pump station and force main design report prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer.

C59. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The Project proponents propose connecting the Project area’s sewage collection facilities to the SacSewer New Natomas Pump Station (NNPS) through proposed and existing SacSewer facilities. The Project area was never intended to be provided service by the SacSewer NNPS, Lower Northwest Interceptor (LNWI), or the South River Pump Station (SRPS) during the design of these facilities. Allowing connection of the Project area may result in significant capacity constraints within the existing SacSewer collections and interceptor systems.

To allow connection to the NNPS, the proposed sewer pump station shall be designed to accommodate 4-hours of upstream buildout peak wet weather flow inline emergency storage. The Project proponents should work closely with SacSewer to ensure proper connection to any existing SacSewer facilities. Necessary improvements to address capacity constraints shall be evaluated in the Level 3 sewer study and the pump station and force main design report.

C60. PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: To obtain sewer service, construction of SacSewer sewer infrastructure will be required. The SacSewer Standards and Specifications at the time of approval of improvement plans shall apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification.

C61. PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All onsite sewer plans and offsite sewer plans must be submitted separately to SacSewer for review and approval.

C62. PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Construction of sewer mainlines is prohibited within 100-year flood plains. The location of the 100-year flood plain must be shown on the improvement plan.

C63. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-6100 to determine if SacSewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. SacSewer does not guarantee sewer service or system capacity, either permanent or interim, to the property until the property obtains proper permits to connect to the system and pays all sewer impact fees.

RD 1000: Jeff Kashiwada, (916) 993-4630
C64. Reclamation District No. 1000 (RD 1000) provides flood control and drainage services to the area impacted by the proposed development. The applicant will be required to complete a drainage study to identify impacts of the project on our drainage system and to identify improvements, both on-site and off-site, necessary to mitigate these impacts to the satisfaction of RD 1000.

C65. The applicant will be required to enter into a Funding Agreement with RD 1000 to reimburse our costs incurred with our technical reviews or other services associated with the proposed project, to the satisfaction of RD 1000.

C66. The applicant will be required to enter into a Drainage Improvement Agreement with RD 1000 and the City of Sacramento to implement the improvements identified in the drainage study and to pay the RD 1000 Development Impact Fee, all to the satisfaction of RD 1000.

C67. The properties will be subject to RD 1000 assessments and fees based on the land use designations post development.

C68. The proposed Project and the drainage improvements shall not interfere with improvements proposed adjacent to the development by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and SAFCA along the West Drainage Canal as part of the ARCF Natomas Basin Project.

DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES: Saraí Ochoa Jimenez, (916) 808-5426 C69. All existing easements and all existing right-of-ways shall be shown on the Final Map, except for all abandoned easements and right-of-ways.

C70. Dedicate all necessary easements, IOD easements right-of-way, IOD to Lot A, B, C, D, E, and G for detention basins and drainage pump station, or IOD in fee title property on the final map as required to implement the approved drainage and water studies. If required, easements shall be dedicated for off-site water and storm drain main extensions. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated for common water and drainage pipes identified in the water and drainage master plan. All dedications shall be at no cost to the City and shall be free and clear of all encumbrances and liens and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU.

C71. The applicant shall provide continuous and uninterrupted water supply with the exception of approved short-term shutdowns to the County’s water system serving the Sacramento International Airport and Metro Air Park during the construction of the project. This can include identification or construction of an additional point of connection to the City water system serving Sacramento International Airport and Metro Air Park to satisfaction of the DOU and the County of Sacramento. Any proposed short-term shutdowns for temporary parallel facilities shall be to the satisfaction of the Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA). Any proposed short-term shutdowns for temporary parallel facilities shall be to the satisfaction of the Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA). The applicant shall provide an approved document from the SCWA for the proposed temporary shutdown to the DOU.

C72. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the improvement plans, the applicant shall coordinate with Sacramento County and the Sacramento International Airport on the submittal of a risk assessment that shall be reviewed and approved by both agencies and shall be to the satisfaction of Sacramento County and the Sacramento International Airport. Prior to approval of the improvement plans a copy of the approved risk assessment shall be provided to the DOU.

C73. The applicant shall dedicate a 20-foot-wide water pipeline easement and ingress/egress easements to Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) centered on the 16-inch, 30- inch and 24-inch County water pipelines to the satisfaction of the SCWA.

C74. The transfer of the 30-inch County water transmission main to the City from the SCWA will require reimbursement to the County for the depreciated value of the transmission main. The reimbursement will be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Prior to the submittal of the improvement plans, the applicant shall come to an agreement with the SCWA, SMF, and DOU, on the County transmission main connection, reimbursement, and any SCWA requirements. If an agreement is not reached and the transfer of ownership of the 30-inch water t-main does not occur, a revised design of the water system for the Airport South Industrial will be required prior to the submittal of the improvement plans.

C75. The applicant shall relocate and construct the City/County metering station including and not limited to the meter, electrical equipment, and power to the location as specified in the accepted preliminary water study, or as otherwise approved by the DOU and Sacramento County.

C76. The applicant shall dedicate a minimum 23-foot wide water pipeline easement centered over all portions of the current SCWA 30-inch water transmission main that will be transferred to the City, to the satisfaction of the DOU.

C77. Prior to the submittal of the subdivision improvement plans, the existing Preliminary Water Study will be required to be updated for review and approval by the DOU. The water distribution system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water service connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any water related requirements. Failure to submit the water study may delay review and approval. (Note: Any proposed modifications to the accepted preliminary water study will require a resubmittal to be reviewed and approved by the DOU.) C78. Two points of service for the public water distribution system for this subdivision or any phase of this subdivision are required. All City water mains shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-ways as specified in the City’s Design and Procedures Manual or within dedicated City easements as approved by the DOU. (Note: Public mains are not permitted to be located within median areas. Dual water mains may be required where there are medians located within the street.) C79. The applicant shall coordinate with RD 1000 and Natomas Central Mutual Water Company on any proposed water main crossings through the existing canals adjacent to the East of the property line of the Tentative Master Parcel Map (TMPM) Lands.

C80. The applicant shall dedicate a water easement (minimum 15-ft width centered over the water main) for the proposed City water distribution mains located outside the public right-of-way or as otherwise approved by the DOU.

C81. Prior to submittal of the subdivision improvement plans, the existing Preliminary Drainage Study will be required to be updated for review and approval by the DOU. The applicant shall complete a drainage master plan as it pertains to the pump station requirements and project site modeling demonstrating no impacts to the RD 1000 system for the entire site (including non-mapped lands outside the TMPM but included as part of the LAFCo Annexation process). Assumptions shall be made for the proposed detention and water quality facilities for parcels not included as part of the TMPM but included in the annexation. Amendments to the drainage master plan shall be performed in the future for those developments.

C82. All City drainage lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public-right-of-ways as per the City’s Design and Procedures Manual or within dedicated public easements as approved by the DOU. The drainage master plan is required to show the sizes of all common trunk lines in the street right-of-ways. If required, the drainage master plan shall include basins designed and constructed for flood control and water quality treatment.

The proposed drainage facilities and flood control/water quality basin shall be sized to handle storm drain runoff from the Airport South Industrial developed lands. The drainage study analysis shall also demonstrate that existing offsite flows that drain across the project site are not negatively impacted and/or blocked by the development of this project. The design shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. The DOU shall review and approve the drainage master plan. The drainage study shall meet the criteria specified in the current Design and Procedures Manual. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Drainage Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements and design criteria.

C83. A soils study prepared by a California licensed geotechnical engineer is required for proposed onsite detention systems. The soil study shall include a groundwater analysis demonstrating that the soil is shown to allow a maximum drawdown time of 48 hours and recommendations to address potential infiltration into the detention basins. If the project area has groundwater infiltration, an impermeable clay liner, pumping, or other DOU approved equivalent (reference Design and Procedures Manual section 11.9.4, 11.9.7 and11.9.8 for approved alternates) shall be used to control groundwater infiltration and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. If a clay liner is not used, a net present value alternative analysis shall be provided addressing any increased operational cost. Developer’s potential share of operation costs for groundwater infiltration control will be explored with the processing of the design-level drainage study and / or the Common Drainage Improvement Plans prepared for the project.

C84. Prior to vertical construction, the applicant shall construct the detention basin, a drainage pump station and discharge pipes, construct inlet and outlet structures, and frontage improvements for the detention basins and pump station that will be located on Lots A, B, C, D, E and Lot G per the approved Drainage Master Plan and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. Applicant shall submit a separate set of improvement plans for the detention basin design and drainage pump station (common drainage facilities). The CIP Drainage Group within the DOU shall review these plans. Prior to design of these facilities, the applicants’ engineer shall meet with the CIP Drainage Group to discuss design standards. Common drainage facility design and construction may be phased as determined in the Drainage Master plan and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. The drainage study shall be modified to address each phase of the project and shall be approved by RD-1000 and the DOU.

C85. Prior to the initiation of water and storm drainage service to the development, a privately funded maintenance district or a homeowner’s association (HOA) shall be formed and C.C.&R’s shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities within the common areas. Private easements shall be dedicated for these facilities. The CC&Rs must provide that the Cityapproved provisions regarding water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent. If required by the DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities. The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

C86. The applicant shall provide a financing mechanism acceptable to the City for the landscape maintenance of the proposed detentions basins (e.g. create a maintenance district, annex into an existing landscape maintenance district, etc.). The developer shall maintain the basin facility for a period of two (2) years. The two-year period shall begin following the issuance of a notice of completion by the City for the Detention Facility.

Prior to acceptance of maintenance responsibilities by the City the developer shall remove any sediment or debris that has accumulated and shall confirm the basin complies with all the design standards per the approved basin plans. A maintenance plan and guidelines will be required for all City owned and maintained detention basins.

The City will review and provide guidance to the applicant for the preparation and completion of the maintenance plan. (Note: The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Water Quality Section (916-808-7890) to request a sample maintenance plan.)
C87. The widening improvements Power Line Road and/or any future road shall not negatively impact the design and operation of the detention basins and/or City DOU owned facilities within the project boundaries.

C88. A post and cable fence shall be constructed around the City detention basins shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU.

C89. Any proposed weir(s) in the access roads surrounding any City detention basins shall be designed such that DOU maintenance vehicles can safely drive above the 100-year water surface elevation.

C90. The project is located in two Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), designated as A99 and A zones on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). Per City Code Chapter 15.108.40 "Floodplain Risk Notifications", construction of any structure located in a SFHA requires the execution of a Hold Harmless Agreement with the City, regarding risk of flooding.

C91. Prior to any building permit issuance, the applicant is required to obtain an approved Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. Prior to any certificate of occupancy, an approved Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA is required. If FEMA is unwilling to review or issue a CLOMR or LOMR based on other plans or timing associated with the larger picture of the future Natomas Basin A99 Revisions, then the applicant assumes responsibility to explore alternative methods and work with the City to allow site development within the SFHA Zone A areas pending FEMA approval.

C92. All structures within the SFHA zone shall have their finished floors elevated to a minimum of 1.0 foot above the base flood elevation, once established by FEMA through the CLOMR process or as otherwise determined by the DOU. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant is advised to contact the Development Services Floodplain Section at 916-808-7890 for questions regarding flood requirements. (Note: There is a Natomas Basin Hydraulic Model that is currently being finalized.) C93. This project is currently using the latest RD1000's XPSWMM model, however, there is a new HEC-RAS interior drainage model for this area which has been submitted to FEMA for preliminary review. Once approved, this model will be used to evaluate all the interior levees for the entire Natomas basin area. Proceeding with the current XPSWMM carries risk in that there is uncertainty in the final water surface elevations. If the developer proceeds with the current model prior to the HEC-RAS model being finalized, the developer will need to accept all risk and acknowledge there may be a potential for updating their models and designs once the data is available.

C94. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the building permit application, the applicant shall, through the preparation of the Drainage Study for the project shall demonstrate the project will not increase flood heights for any portion of the project located within the SFHA(s). The Drainage Study and associated modeling shall be supported by technical data satisfying FEMA requirements and signed by a registered professional engineer.

C95. Per City Code, the applicant may not develop the project in any way that obstructs, impedes, or interferes with the natural flow of existing off-site drainage that crosses the property. The project shall construct the required public and/or private infrastructure to handle off-site runoff to the satisfaction of the DOU. If private infrastructure is constructed to handle off-site runoff, the applicant shall dedicate the required private easements, and/or, at the discretion of the DOU, the applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement for Maintenance of Drainage with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

C96. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required. Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to existing surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

C97. This project will disturb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

C98. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is in an area not served by an existing regional water quality control facility and/or the project has more than one-acre of new or modified impervious area, therefore, Low Impact Development (LID), Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP), certified full capture trash control devices and on-site treatment control measures will be required. The on-site storm water treatment control measures required may affect site design and site configuration and should be considered during early planning stages.

C99. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, and approvals from federal, state (Caltrans), and local agencies for the construction of this project.

C100. The proposed development is located within the Reclamation District 1000 (RD 1000).

The applicant shall comply with all RD 1000 requirements.

C101. Obtain written approval from RD 1000 and the Natomas Central Mutual Water Company for the abandonment and/or relocation of any existing canals and provide a copy of the written approvals to the DOU.

C102. Obtain written approval from RD 1000 for any proposed connections to their canals and provide a copy of the written approval to the DOU.

FIRE: King Tunson, (916) 808-1358
C103. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, provide means of identifying that the farthest projection of the exterior wall of a building shall be accessible from within 150 ft of an approved Fire Department access road (minimum 20’ wide) and approved water supply as measured by an unobstructed route around the exterior of the building. (California Fire Code Sections 503.1.1, 507.5.1)
C104. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, identify that all turning radii for fire access shall be designed as 35’ inside and 55’ outside. California Fire Code Section 503.2.4
C105. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, identify that fire hydrants have been provided in accordance with California Fire Code Section 507 and Appendix C, Section C102.1 as amended the Sacramento City Code Section 507.5.1.

C106. Fire service mains shall not cross property lines unless a reciprocal easement agreement is provided.

C107. A reciprocal ingress egress agreement shall be provided for review by City Attorney for all shared driveways being used for Fire Department access.

C108. Maintenance agreements shall be provided for the interior private roadways of the proposed complex and for the private fire protection systems. The agreement shall be record with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction and shall provide for the following:
a. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of the roadway surface b. Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of thirteen feet six inches (13’6”) and/or width of twenty feet (20’) c. Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signage or striping
d. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates and opening systems
e. Unrestricted use of and access to the roadways covered by the agreements. f. Provisions for the control of vehicle parking in prohibited areas and a mechanism for the removal of vehicles illegally parked.
g. Maintenance and timely repair of all fire protection systems, including but not limited to hydrants, fire alarm systems and fire sprinklers.

SPECIAL DISTRICTS: Mary Jean Rodriguez, (916) 808-1980
C109. The applicant shall annex to the North Natomas Transportation Management Association (TMA) or other TMA.

C110. The applicant shall initiate and complete formation of a maintenance district (assessment or Mello-Roos CFD district); or annex the project to an existing maintenance district prior to recording a Final Subdivision Map. The applicant shall pay all City fees for formation of or annexation to special districts.

ADVISORY NOTES:

The following advisory notes are informational in nature and are not a requirement of this Tentative Map:

ADV1.The development agreement includes special conditions related to the construction and widening of the Metro Air Parkway interchange, ramps and other off-site improvements as listed in the phasing and fair share analysis memorandum prepared by DKS Associates. The construction and widening of the Metro Air Parkway interchange, including other off-site improvements as listed in the phasing plan will be required once development applications (Site Plan and Design Review and building permits) are submitted as noted in the Development Agreement, special conditions section. The widening and construction of the Metro Air Parkway interchange shall be consistent with the approved County of Sacramento plans for said interchange. Any work on the interchange will require at a minimum coordination with Caltrans and the County of Sacramento, an encroachment permit from Caltrans, plan check review from the County of Sacramento, Caltrans and the City of Sacramento.

ADV2.The proposed development is located within the Sacramento Area Sewer District (SacSewer). Satisfy all SacSewer requirements. A copy of the approved sewer master plan shall be provided to the DOU to assure there are no conflicts with water and/or drainage facilities within the proposed streets and/or City easements.

ADV3.On October 24, 2023, and November 14, 2023, City Council adopted Resolutions 2023- 0338 and 2023-0368, respectively, to adjust the Water System, Sewer, and Combined Sewer Development Fees, as well as establish the Storm Drainage Development Fee to align with updated Nexus Studies. These resolutions provide for an effective date for the new Utility Development Fees as of January 22, 2024. (Note: Based on the proposed detention basins and drainage pump station associated with this project, Storm Drainage Development Fees will not apply.)
ADV4.As per City Code, the applicant will be responsible to meet his/her obligations regarding:
a. Consideration for continuation of off-street shared path at Egret Park and Open Space with trail connections within the industrial and commercial developments. b. Title 18, 18.56 Park Development Impact Fee, due at the time of issuance of building permit. The Park Development Impact Fee is estimated at $1,072,399. The Park Development Impact Fee due for this project is based on the Remainder of City Rate of $0.56 per square foot for retail and commercial services projects, $0.76 per square foot for commercial office projects, and $ 0.22 per square foot for industrial projects.

Any change in these factors will change the amount of the PIF due. The fee is calculated using factors at the time that the project is submitted for building permit.

ADV5.The applicant shall participate in the ASI Public Facilities Finance Plan, adopted by City Council, and as updated, and pay all required fees and shall execute any, and all agreements, which may be required, in order to implement this condition.

ADV6.Require site plan in AutoCAD 2022 for SMUD feasibility study.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Tentative Master Parcel Map

DEL PASO RD

POWER LINE RD

AIRPORT BLVD

LONE TREE RD W ELKHORN BLVD

N BAYOU RD

METRO AIR PKWY INTER
HIGHWAY 99 INTERNATIONAL SACRAMENTO SITE PROJECT

BAYOU WAY
STATE
5 AIRPORT CITY OF SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

NORTH NTS
1382' 250'± 52' 200' 151' 403' 306' 1545'
138'
93'
168'
83'
1177' 942' 250'±
457' 338' 1925' 2171'
94'
965' 380' 2633'
232'
360' 448' 180' 384'
110' 70' 75' 38' 44'
324' 160'
335' 239' 170'
322'
335' 628'
943'
72'
341'
225' 233'
125'
61'
402' 293'
274'
722' 2266' 350' 196' 125'
47' 156'
165' 194' 202' 126'
265'
902' 1030'
85' 370'
76' 313'
197'
325'
128' 2672' 2207'
94'
905' 691' 194' 846' 25' 805'
642'
101' 148'
52' 200'
1011' 78'
52' 18' 78'
332'
267'
399'
399' 126'
208'
127' 398' 427'
123' 22'
1016' 50'
60'252' 252'
180'
259' 463'
229' 395'
381' 411'
488' 411' 297' 988' 655' 341' 344' 314'
296' 314' 211'
277' 351' 2232'
24'
350'
24' 170' 39'
11'
350'
963' 1314'
1302' 502'
47' 655'
207'
290'
61'
166'
989'
47'
256' 215'
40' 39' 332'
108' 244' 388' 189'
100' 22'
19'
1304'
795' 496'
39'
244'
298' 41' 338' 250'±
250'± 134'
R=121' R=121' 139'
75' INTERSTATE 5
35' WIDE CANAL BOTTOM/ DEPTH = 10' 2:1 SLOPE 50' BUFFER 35' WIDE CANAL BOTTOM/ DEPTH=10' 2:1 SLOPE INTERSTATE 5 2:1 SLOPE

METRO AIR PRKWY
S. BAYOU WAY
BAYOU

TO BE ABANDONED
POWER
50' BUFFER LOT D DETENTION/ RETENTION BASIN LOT C DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN LOT A DETENTION/ RETENTION BASIN PARCEL 6CHC 3.9 ± AC. (G) 3.1 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 7CHC 1.5 ± AC. (G) 1.3 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 1 INDUSTRIAL 48.7 ± AC. (G) 46.8 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 2 INDUSTRIAL 51.3 ± AC. (G) 49.4 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 3 INDUSTRIAL 34.6 ± AC. (G) 33.2 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 4 INDUSTRIAL 52.2 ± AC. (G) 50.2 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 5A INDUSTRIAL 11.8 ± AC. (G) 11.4 ± AC. (N) SCALORA APN: 225-0030-045 BK. 225, PG. 003 (NAPOTS) 8.0 ± AC. (G) 7.9 ± AC. (N) 32.6 ± AC. (G) 32.3 ± AC. (N) 10.9 ± AC. (G) 9.1 ± AC. (N) 8.8 ± AC. (G) 7.6 ± AC. (N) SOUTH BAYOU WAY "A" DRIVE AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
TO BE ABANDONED LOT F SEWER PUMP STATION 1.0 ± AC. (G) 0.7 ± AC. (N) LOT G DRAINAGE PUMP STATION 1.1 ± AC. (G) 0.9 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 6AHC 1.9 ± AC. (G) 1.9 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 6BHC 1.9 ± AC. (G) 1.4 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 7BHC 2.1 ± AC. (G) 1.4 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 7AHC 4.4 ± AC. (G) 3.9 ± AC. (N) PROP. 61' CANAL (35' WIDE @ BOTTOM W/ 2:1 SIDE SLOPES
(NOTE) 60' EXISTING CANAL ESMT) PROPOSED BRIDGE/ CULVERT ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND OTHER RIGHTS PER 340 OR 529 RELINQUISHED FREEWAY ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS PER 5350 OR 193 RELINQUISHED FREEWAY ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS PER 5317 OR 395 RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES, ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS. EASEMENT TO ELKHORN MUTUAL WATER COMPANY FOR DITCH OR CANAL AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER 492 OR 324 RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES, ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS (TO BE ABANDONED) EASEMENT TO ELKHORN MUTUAL WATER COMPANY FOR DITCH OR CANAL AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER 492 OR 324 (TO BE ABANDONED) PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER 558 OR 24 (TO BE ABANDONED) RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES, ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS. IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER 5326 OR 293 (TO BE ABANDONED) DRAINAGE CANAL EASEMENT PER 20191024 OR 1565 PUBLIC ROADWAY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT PER 20150915 OR 1232 (TO BE ABANDONED) ABOVE GROUND PUBLIC UTILITY FACILITIES EASEMENT PER 20191024 OR 1569 (TO BE ABANDONED) ELECTRICAL FACILITES EASEMENT PER 1223-B OR 268 RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES, ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS. 10' CANAL RESERVATION PER 16 BM 3 15' CANAL RESERVATION PER 16 BM 3 RW ESMT TO NATOMAS CENTRAL MUTUAL WATER COMPANY PER 589 OR 184 35' PRIVATE ROAD & CANAL RESERVATION PER 16 BM 3 CL OF SMUD ESMT PER 1387 OR 33, SUBJECT TO RW GRANTED TO RD 1000 FOR DRAINAGE CANAL ALONG WESTERLY SIDE OF LOT 90 (NO WIDTH STATED) 25' PRIVATE ROAD & CANAL RESERVATION PER 16 BM 3 20' DRAINAGE CANAL ESMT TO RD1000 PER BK 76, PG 388 POLE LINE EASEMENT ELECTRICAL FACILITES EASEMENT PER 1321-A OR 494 PER 1223-B OR 271 ELECTRICAL FACILITES EASEMENT PER 1223-B OR 270 OVERHEAD POWER LINE POLES FURTHER THAN 4' FROM E. EDGE OF CANAL 20' RD1000 ESMT PER 5331 OR 130 50' RD1000 ESMT PER 5331 OR 130 R=1000' TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING RURAL POWER LINE ROAD EXISTING CELLULAR TOWER TRANSFORMER AND FENCED AREA R=1000' NO TRUCK ACCESS EAST TO SOUTH BAYOU WAY PROPOSED 50-FOOT WIDE WEIR EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20150915 OR 1232 (TO BE ABANDONED) ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO OR FROM FREEWAY HAVE BEEN RELINQUISHED, PER 670303, OR 204 EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20150915 OR 1232 RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES, ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS. EASEMENT TO PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. FOR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS THERETO AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 3844 OR 80EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE CANALS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 670303 OR 195 EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE CANALS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 670303 OR 195 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 201-0291-026 RIVER ROCK INVESTMENTS LLC 201-1020-055 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 225-0010-021 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000 225-0010-034 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 225-0010-021 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 225-0010-017 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 225-0010-009 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 225-0010-010 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 225-0010-011 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 225-0010-013 NP MAP AND LAND HOLDINGS LLC 225-0010-015 NP MAP AND LAND HOLDINGS LLC 225-0010-014 NATOMAS BASIN CONSERVANCY 225-0020-013 NATOMAS BASIN CONSERVANCY 225-0020-012 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000
225-0030-012 DHR CAPITAL LLC 225-0030-060

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
225-1480-053 CITY OF SACRAMENTO
225-1480-056 CITY OF SACRAMENTO
225-1480-020 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 225-0030-050

GRAND STAFF
2010 TRUST
225-1590-008 MENGI 225-1590-009 BRAH 225-1590-010 MONTEMAYOR 225-1590-011 BASSI 225-1590-012 MITROS 225-1590-013 HENDERSON 225-1590-014 THOMAS 225-1590-015 GARTNER 225-1590-016 WILLIAM J & RITA J BOWEN 2007 REVOCABLE TRUST 225-1590-017 BUTTERMAN 225-1590-018 MOIN 225-1590-019 DURETTE 225-1590-020 CHU 225-1590-021 HUANG 225-1590-022 MOMOH 225-1590-023 MAYO 225-1590-024 JOHN 225-1590-025 MCARDLE 225-1590-026 225-1830-009 CLYDE 225-1830-010
FONG
225-1830-011 AHMADI
FRIES 225-1830-008 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 201-1020-092 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 201-1020-090 KOSAREFF 201-1020-147 RIVER ROCK INVESTMENTS LLC 201-1020-140 RIVER ROCK INVESTMENTS LLC 201-1020-139 WILLIAM LINN 201-1020-030 LINN JUNE C 1999 TRUST 201-1020-056 GREENBRIAR PROJECT OWNER LLC 201-0300-183 GREENBRIAR PHASE 2 LLC 201-1510-025 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1000 225-0020-011 RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF NATOMAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR DITCHES, ROADS AND OTHER STATED ITEMS. EASEMENT TO PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. FOR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS THERETO AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 3844 OR 80 EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20180308 OR 0529 EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE CANAL OR DITCH AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20191024 OR 1567 EASEMENT FOR ABOVE GROUND PUBLIC UTILITY FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20150915 OR 1229 (TO BE ABANDONED) EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE CANAL OR DITCH AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20191024 OR 1565 (TO BE ABANDONED) EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE CANAL OR DITCH AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20191024 OR 1565 (TO BE ABANDONED) ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO OR FROM FREEWAY HAVE BEEN RELINQUISHED, PER 20180308 OR 0528 EASEMENT TO NATOMAS CENTRAL MUTUAL WATER COMPANY FOR IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 5350 OR 187 EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE CANAL OR DITCH AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER 20191024 OR 1567 RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS PER GRANT DEED, BK 5317, PG 395 RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS PER GRANT DEED, BK 5331, PG 124 RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS PER DIRECTOR'S DEED, BK 861021 PG 0434 RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS PER GRANT DEED, BK 5331, PG 124 25' PRIVATE ROAD & CANAL RESERVATION PER 16 BM 3 OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) A F1
B GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL #2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL #1 D
C 16.9 ± AC. (G) 14.9 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 5C INDUSTRIAL 9.4 ± AC. (G) 8.1 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 5D INDUSTRIAL 6.5 ± AC. (G) 6.2 ± AC. (N) SOUTH BAYOU ROW 2.2 ± AC. (G) 2.2 ± AC. (N) LOT B DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN 32.3 ± AC. (G) 31.6 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 5E INDUSTRIAL 2.6 ± AC. (G) 2.3 ± AC. (N) PARCEL 5F INDUSTRIAL 2.1 ± AC. (G) 2.1 ± AC. (N) "B" DRIVE
82'
82'

67.5' 75' 75'
63'
R=75'
R=75.5' 102'
R=84' R=55' R=84' R=61' R=84' R=200'
60' PROPOSED 20' BIKE AND WATER LINE EASEMENT PARCEL 13 INDUSTRIAL 1.5 ± AC. (G) 1.2 ± AC. (N) 119' APN: 225-0020-032 BK. 225, PG. 002 CALTRANS ROW (NAPOTS) ISGUR APN: 225-0030-024 BK. 225, PG. 003 (NAPOTS) PATEL APN: 225-0030-028 BK. 225, PG. 003 (NAPOTS)

E SANGSTER (NAPOTS)
G
R=400'
R=400' SUBDIVISION MODIFICATION #2 CAL TRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY

CAL TRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT S. BAYOU WAY

LANFRANCO

LANFRANCO
CIRCLE
CIRCLE

CREST HAWK
CIRCLE
LANE MONETTA OLD SOUTH BAYOU WAY ABANDONMENT ENDS HERE OLD SOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE ABANDONED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA VIA SEPARATE PROCESS IN THE FUTURE A1

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
82'
82'
82'
/EL CENTRO ROAD
60' OFFSITE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE DEDICATED BY OTHERS.
63' 63'
OLD S.

RW TBA
100' SUBDIVISION MODIFICATION #3
TO BE

SOUTH BAYOU WAY

ABANDONED

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITY OF SACRAMENTO EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) PROPOSED 24' ACCESS EASEMENT TO SANGSTER PROPERTY (APN 225-0020-032) R=342'
R=199'
R=201'
R=156' LOT H SMUD SUBSTATION 1.8 ± AC. (G) 1.4 ± AC. (N) LINE ROAD F2
A R=500' PARCEL 5B INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION MODIFICATION #1 PROPOSED 20' EASEMENT FOR FUTURE SMUD 69kV LINE SEE DETAIL B

67.5' PROPOSED 20' EASEMENT FOR FUTURE SMUD 69kV LINE LOT E DETENTION/ RETENTION BASIN 75' STREET SECTION "A" DRIVE (MODIFIED 2-LANE LOCAL INDUSTRIAL) NTS B 6' 12' 3' 6'-6" TRAVEL LANE WALK 37'-6"
CL R/W 75' 6'-6" 3' 12' 6' 5' WALK TRAVEL LANE 37'-6" R/W 5' 63' STREET SECTION NTS C
CL63' 6'-6" 5' WALK 31'-6" R/W 5' "B" DRIVE (LOCAL INDUSTRIAL) 12' TRAVEL LANE 5' 6'-6" WALK 31'-6" 12' 5' TRAVEL LANE 67.5' STREET SECTION AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE NTS A1 (MODIFIED 2-LANE LOCAL INDUSTRIAL) 12' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN OR TWO WAY TURN LANE 6' 12' TRAVEL LANE 26' CL R/W 70.5' 6'-6" 12' 6' WALK TRAVEL LANE 44'-6" R/W 12' PARCEL 1 SCALORA 225-0030-045 PARCEL 5B PARCEL 5D 3' 3' BIKE LANE BIKE LANE 3' PUE 12'-6" PUE 12'-6" PUE 12'-6" PUE 12'-6" PUE 12'-6" 12' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN OR TWO WAY TURN LANE R/W SUBDIVISION MODIFICATION #2 FOR CUL-DE-SAC 5' 5' BIKE LANE BIKE LANE SMUD EASEMENT FOR FUTURE 69kV LINE 20' 82' STREET SECTION AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE NTS A (MODIFIED 2-LANE LOCAL INDUSTRIAL) 12' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN OR TWO WAY TURN LANE 6' 12' 3' 6'-6" TRAVEL LANE WALK 37'-6" CL R/W 82' 6'-6" 12' 6' 5' WALK TRAVEL LANE 44'-6" R/W 12' PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 3' PUE 12'-6" PUE 12'-6" SMUD EASEMENT FOR FUTURE 69kV LINE 20' SMUD EASEMENT FOR FUTURE 69kV LINE 20' P.L. ROADSIDE DITCH 5' BIKE LANE 5' BIKE LANE 5' BIKE LANE 5' BIKE LANE 3' NORTH NTS 119' STREET SECTION METRO AIR PARKWAY (MOD. 4-LANE ARTERIAL ROADWAY) NTS F1 11' 5' 6'-6" TURN LANE WALK 58' CL R/W 119' 11' TURN LANE 6'-6" 5' 11' 5' WALK TRAVEL LANE 61' R/W 14' TURN LANE 5' BIKE LANE BIKE LANE 11' TRAVEL LANE 2' 12' 3' TRAVEL LANE 11' TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN BIKE BUFFER PUE 12'-6" PUE 12'-6" 102' STREET SECTION METRO AIR PARKWAY (MOD. 4-LANE ARTERIAL ROADWAY) NTS F2 6' 6'-6" WALK 58' CL R/W 102' 6'-6" 6' 11' 5' WALK TRAVEL LANE 44' R/W 11' TURN LANE 5' BIKE LANE BIKE LANE 11' TURN LANE 11' 3' TRAVEL LANE BIKE MEDIAN BUFFER PUE 12'-6" PUE 12' 12'-6" TRAVEL LANE 3' 5' AT AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE 59' STREET SECTION BAYOU WAY AT EL CENTRO ROAD NTS E TWO WAY TURN LANE 6' 12' 6' 6' TRAVEL LANE WALK 35'
CL R/W 59' 10' 12' 6' 5' TRAVEL LANE 24' R/W 6' BIKE LANE BIKE LANE EXISTING 40' R/W EXISTING 40' R/W 82' EXISTING 18' PAVEMENT R=121' R=121' LOT H SMUD SUBSTATIONLOT A DETENTION BASIN G
A
NORTH NTS 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY POWER LINE ROAD NTS
G 9±'25' 22±' 9±' P.L.A.S.I. PROPERTY TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE 3±' EXISTING DRAINAGE CANAL (DEPTH UNKNOWN) 4+' EXISTING POWER LINE POLE EXISTING POWER 15' LINE POLE EXISTING PAVEMENT 40' 25' SACRAMENTO COUNTY 2-LANE COLLECTOR ROAD STANDARD EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY EXISTING CANAL & ROADWAY EASEMENT TO RD1000 NTS D ONE WAY LANE 12' TRAVEL LANE 8'± SOUTH BAYOU ROAD (EAST BOUND ONE WAY STREET) 8'± PAVED SHOULDER (P) GUARD RAIL 15'± SHOULDER 60' ROW 50' RD1000 EASEMENT 17'± 28'± EXISTING PAVEMENT PAVED SHOULDER EXISTING CALTRANS R/W CANAL VICINITY MAP TENTATIVE MASTER PARCEL MAP AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 21, 2025 TENTATIVE MASTER PARCEL MAP - AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760 200 Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767 0 400 NORTH 800 PROJECT NOTES NOTES 1) SUBDIVIDER(S) RESERVES THE RIGHT TO FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. 2) EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY WOOD RODGERS AND WAS FLOWN IN 2021. 3) OWNER WILL DEDICATE ALL EASEMENTS AND I.O.D.S NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ALL UTILITIES. 4) THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. 5) THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR TENTATIVE MAP PURPOSES ONLY. ALL SITE CHARACTERISTICS ARE TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINAL MAP. 6) THE NORTH HALF SECTION OF SOUTH BAYOU WAY TO BE ABANDONED AND DEDICATED TO THE ADJACENT SANGSTER LIVING TRUST PARCEL (APN: 225-0020-032). RECORD OWNER NP MAP LAND HOLDING CO LLC 1410 ROCKY RIDGE DR., SUITE 110 ROSEVILLE, CA, 95661 CONTACT: GEOFF GRIFFIN PHONE: (916) 316-3562 APPLICANT AVDIS & CUCCHI, LLP 1415 L STREET, SUITE 410 SACRAMENTO, CA, 95814 CONTACT: NICHOLAS AVDIS, PARTNER PHONE: (916) 659-7500 PLANNER/ENGINEER WOOD RODGERS INC. 3301 'C' STREET, BLDG. 100B SACRAMENTO, CA 95816 CONTACT: MARK RODGERS, PE #41540 STAN METTE PHONE: (916) 341-7760 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 225-0020-010, -016, -017, -021, -022, -023, -024, -026, -027, -030, -033, -034, -035 225-0030-023 AREA 352.0 ± ACRES GROSS NUMBER OF PARCELS 11 INDUSTRIAL LOTS 6 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL LOTS 7 PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC LOTS 24 PARCELS TOTAL EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE SEE LAND USE SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING AG-20, AG-80 (COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO) PROPOSED ZONING HC-PUD, M-1-PUD (CITY OF SACRAMENTO) PARK DISTRICT CITY OF SACRAMENTO FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF SACRAMENTO SCHOOL DISTRICT NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SEWER CITY OF SACRAMENTO STORM DRAIN CITY OF SACRAMENTO WATER CITY OF SACRAMENTO ELECTRICITY SMUD GAS PG&E LAND USE SUMMARY SOUTH BAYOU ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT SOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAY TO REMAIN EAST OF INDUSTRIAL ROAD DETAIL A: NTS POWER LINE ROAD PROPOSED AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE SOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE ABANDONED FROM THE WEST LIMITS OF CALTRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY TO LIMITS OF THE OLD SOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAY OWNED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. POWER LINE ROAD-AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE INTERSECTION DETAIL B: NTS SUBDIVISION 1. NON-STANDARD STREET SECTION. NO SIDEWALK IS PROPOSED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SOUTH BAYOU ROAD FROM THE ROUNDABOUT EAST TO EL CENTRO ROAD CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING EL CENTRO ROAD/SOUTH BAYOU 2-WAY CROSS SECTION. 2. NON-STANDARD STREET SECTION AND CUL-DE-SAC ON B DRIVE CONNECTION, EASEMENT AND ACCESS NORTH TO THE SANGSTER LIVING TRUST (NAPOTS) PARCEL. 3. EXISTING COUNTY STREET THAT DOES NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS TO BE CONVERTED TO NON-STANDARD EASTBOUND ONE-WAY LOCAL INDUSTRIAL STREET. N.A.P.O.T.S. N.A.P.O.T.S. INTERSTATE 5 MODIFICATIONS: PORTION OF OLD SOUTH BAYOU RIGHT-OF-WAY OWNED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO BE ABANDONED VIA SEPARATE STATE PROCESS IN THE FUTURE AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE

POWER LINE ROAD
R=500'
R=500' EXISTING PAVEMENT IS SHADED

B DRIVE CALTRANS R/W CALTRANS R/W TRANS CAL
R/W SIDEWALK ENDS HERE EXPAND POWER LINE ROAD/ASI DRIVE CURB RETURN TO ACCOMMODATE WB-67 TURNING RADII SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE AT AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE.

A.S.I. BOUNDARY

EXISTING DRAINAGE CANAL R/W
RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
December 2, 2025
AMENDING THE CITY’S BICYCLE MASTER PLAN TO INCORPORATE THE BIKEWAY

FACILITIES NETWORK IN THE AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P21-017)

BACKGROUND
A. As stated in the 2040 General Plan in policy M-1.17, the City shall plan for a continuous, low-stress bikeway network consisting of bicycling-friendly facilities that connect neighborhoods with destinations and activity centers throughout the city.

B. On March 20, 2025, the City Active Transportation Commission held a public hearing on the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development and received and considered evidence, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve amending the City Bicycle Master Plan as set forth in Exhibit A.

C. On June 26, 2025, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the Airport South Industrial Planned Unit Development, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve amending the City Bicycle Master Plan as set forth in Exhibit A.

D. On November 18, 2025 & December 2, 2025, the City Council conducted public hearings, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section

17.812.010 and 17.812.030.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearings on the Airport South Industrial Annexation, the City Council finds that amending the City Bicycle Master Plan to modify the bikeway network in Airport South Industrial project area is consistent with the City’s general plan goal to plan for a low-stress bikeway network consisting of bicycling-friendly facilities that connect neighborhoods with destinations and activity centers throughout the city.

Section 2. City Council hereby amends the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to include the Airport South Industrial bicycle network as set forth in Exhibit A.

Section 3. Exhibit A is part of this resolution.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Airport South Industrial Annexation Bicycle Plan Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on December 2, 2025, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

LOT E

DETENTION/

RETENTION BASIN
LOT
D

DETENTION/

RETENTION
BASIN
LOT
C

DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN
PARCEL
1 INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL
2 INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL
3 INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL
4 INDUSTRIAL PARCEL 5B

INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL
5C

INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL
5D

INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL
5A

INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL
5E

INDUSTRIAL
LOT
B

DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN
PARCEL
6C
HC
PARCEL
7C
HC
PARCEL
6A
HC
PARCEL
6B
HC
PARCEL
7B
HC
PARCEL
7A
HC
PARCEL
5F

INDUSTRIAL PARCEL
13 INDUSTRIAL

SCALORA
APN: 225-0030-045
BK. 225, PG. 003
(NAPOTS)
APN: 225-0020-032
BK. 225, PG. 002

CALTRANS
ROW
(NAPOTS)
ISGUR
APN:
225-0030-024
BK. 225, PG. 003
(NAPOTS)
PATEL
APN: 225-0030-028
BK. 225, PG. 003
(NAPOTS)

SANGSTER
(NAPOTS)
SEWER
PUMP

STATION STATION
PUMP
DRN.

1.1 ± AC. (G)

0.9 ± AC. (N)

1.0 ± AC. (G)

0.7 ± AC. (N)
LOT
H
SMUD

SUBSTATION
LOT
A

DETENTION/

RETENTION
BASIN

GENERAL PLAN BIKEWAY DIAGRAM

AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 26, 2025

AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL - GENERAL PLAN BIKEWAY DIAGRAM BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767 0 NORTH 250
500
1000
LEGEND

CLASS I SHARED USE PATHCLASS II BIKE LANECLASS III BIKE ROUTE INTERSTATE 5

AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE

METRO AIR PKWY

POWER LINE ROAD
"B" DRIVE
"A" DRIVE
S. BAYOU WAY/ EL CENTRO RD.

RESOLUTION NO.

ADOPTED BY THE SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL
December 2, 2025

APPROVAL OF WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED AIRPORT

SOUTH INDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION PROJECT

BACKGROUND
A. State law (Water Code Section 10910) requires a water supply and demand analysis (Water Supply Assessment) for development projects of a certain size or type, which would include the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, based on the City's Urban Water Management Plan.

B. The Water Supply Assessment evaluates projected water supplies, determined to be available by the City for the project during normal, single dry and multiple dry years over a 20 year period. The City prepared the Water Supply Assessment for the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project.

C. On June 26, 2025, the City Planning and Design Commission held a noticed public hearing on the Airport South Industrial Annexation Project in accordance with Government Code Sections 65353 and 65453, received and considered evidence, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to adopt the entitlements for the project.

D. On November 18, 2025 & December 2, 2025, the City Council conducted noticed public hearings in accordance with Government Code Sections 65355 and 65453, considered the Environmental Impact Report, and received and considered evidence concerning the entitlements for the project.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Water Supply Assessment for the proposed Airport South Industrial Annexation Project, dated February 24, 2023, and attached hereto, is approved.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Water Supply Assessment

City of Sacramento General Plan. The Sacramento 2040 General contains goals and policies to guide provisions for the City. Applicable policies that support the Airport South Industrial project are provided below.

LUP-1.4 City Services Prior to Annexation. Prior to the provisions of City services to new development in unincorporated areas, the City shall require that the unincorporated properties be annexed into the City. Alternatively, the City may provide utility service to properties in advance of annexation only if the annexation process has been initiated and the landowner and City have executed a conditional agreement for services that stipulates minimum standards for the development of roads and urban infrastructure and criteria and conditions for annexation into the City.

LUP-1.1 Coordinate to Protect Farmland. The City shall continue to work with Sacramento County and other adjacent jurisdictions to implement conservation plans, preserve farmland and protect critical habitat outside the city.

LUP-1.12 Development Adjacent to Agriculture. The City shall require open space or other appropriate buffers for new development abutting productive agricultural areas to protect the viability of active agricultural operations outside of the city and ensure compatibility of uses with residents in adjacent areas.

LUP-1.13 Airport Land Use Compatibility. The City shall work with the Sacramento County Airport System (SCAS) and the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) to ensure that new development near the area's airports is compatible with airport operations, adopted ALUC policies, and applicable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans.

LUP-2.5 Design for Connectivity. The City shall require that all new development maximizes existing and new connections with surroundings and with centers, corridors, parks, and neighborhoods to enhance efficient and direct pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle movement. When feasible, grid patterns should be utilized to facilitate multiple routes.

LUP-4.6 Compatibility with Adjoining Uses. The City shall ensure that the introduction of higher-intensity mixed-use development along major arterial corridors is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring features such as the following: • Buildings set back from rear or side yard property lines adjoining single-unit dwelling residential uses; • Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses to maintain appropriate transitions in scale and to minimize impacts to privacy and solar access; • Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas to the degree feasible; or • Lighting shielded from view and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses.

LUP-4.7 Visual and Physical Character. Using development standards and design standards/guidelines, the City shall promote development patterns and streetscape improvements that transform the visual and physical character of automobile-oriented corridors to create a positive impact on the human and natural systems that interact with them.

LUP-4.10 Multi-Modal Access. The City shall require that new development provide bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access where appropriate to reduce the need for onsite parking and to improve the pedestrian experience within corridors and centers with street trees and landscaping.

LUP-7.5 Industrial Aesthetics. The City shall encourage the development and maintenance of well-designed industrial and light industrial properties and structures that meet adopted standards for visual quality and design, especially where interfacing with other uses.

PFS-3.13 Impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The City shall consider the impacts on environmentally sensitive areas and habitats when locating and designing municipal utilities.

PFS-3.14 Underground Utilities. The City shall require new development to underground utility lines wherever feasible and coordinate with electricity and telecommunications providers to underground existing overhead lines where feasible.

PFS-3.16 Stormwater Design in Private Development. The City shall require proponents of new development and redevelopment projects to submit drainage studies that adhere to City stormwater design requirements and incorporate measures, including "green infrastructure", Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, stormwater treatment, and, if applicable, trash capture devices, to prevent on- or off-site flooding and improve runoff water quality.

PFS-4.8 New Development. The City shall ensure that water supply capacity is in place prior to granting building permits for new development.

ERC 2.2.9 Small Public Places for New Development that requires the City to allow new development to provide small plazas, pocket parks, civic spaces, and other gathering places that are available to the public, particularly in infill areas, to help meet recreational demands.

ERC 2.2.20 Responsiveness to Community that requires the City to work with affected neighborhoods in the design of parks and recreational facilities to meet residents’ needs and interests.

ERC-2.9 Habitat Assessments. The City shall consider the potential impact on sensitive plants and wildlife for each project requiring discretionary approval. If site conditions are such that potential habitat for sensitive plant and/or wildlife species may be present, the City shall require habitat assessments, prepared by a qualified biologist, for sensitive plant and wildlife species. If the habitat assessment determines that suitable habitat for sensitive plant and/or wildlife species is present, then either: 1.

Protocol-level surveys shall be conducted (where survey protocol has been established by a resource agency), or, in the absence of established survey protocol, a focused survey shall be conducted consistent with industry-recognized best practices; or 2.

Suitable habitat and presence of the species shall be assumed to occur within all potential habitat locations identified on the project site. Survey Reports shall be prepared and submitted to the City and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (depending on the species) for further consultation and development of avoidance and/or mitigation measures consistent with state and federal law.

ERC-2.10 Agency Coordination. The City shall coordinate with State and Federal resource agencies (e.g., California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to protect areas containing rare or endangered species of plants and animals.

ERC-2.11 Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. The City shall continue to participate in and support the policies of the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan for the protection of biological resources in the Natomas Basin.

ERC-4.5 Construction Emissions. The City shall ensure that construction and grading activities minimize short-term impacts to air quality by employing appropriate measures and best practices. Refer to Basic Construction Emissions Control Practices (BMPs) recommended by the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD).

ERC-5.2 Reducing Storm Runoff. The City shall encourage project designs that minimize drainage concentrations, minimize impervious coverage, utilize pervious paving materials, utilize low impact development (LID) strategies, and utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce stormwater runoff.

ERC-10.2 Noise Source Control. The City should require noise impacts in new developments to be controlled at the noise source where feasible, as opposed to the receptor end, using techniques including but not limited to the following: • Site design, • Building orientation, • Building design, and • Hours of operation.

M-2.3 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric. Consistent with state law, the City shall evaluate transportation California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts using vehicle miles traveled or other metrics as determined by the City, and shall not rely on automobile delay, as described by level of service or similar measures of vehicular delay as a measure of environmental significance. Local Transportation Analyses (LTA) shall continue to be required when necessary to aid in conditioning project entitlements for needed operational improvements.

M-1.5 Street Design Standards. The City shall maintain street design and operations standards that prioritize comfort and travel time for walking, bicycling, and transit, while managing vehicle speeds and traffic volumes, updating them as best practices evolve.

M-1.13 Walkability. The City shall design streets to prioritize walking by including design elements such as the following: • Grid networks that provide high levels of connectivity; • Closely spaced intersections; • Frequent and low-stress crossings; • Wide, unobstructed walkable sidewalks; • Separation from vehicle traffic; • Street trees that provide shading; and • Minimal curb cuts.

M-1.18 Bicycling Safety. When designing projects, the City shall prioritize designs that strengthen the protection of people bicycling such as improvements that increase visibility of bicyclists, increase bikeway widths, raise bikeways, design safer intersection crossings and turns, and separate bikeways from traffic wherever feasible.

M-1.19 Walking Safety. When designing projects, the City shall prioritize designs that encourage walking and improve walking safety best practice designs and considerations for efficiencies in walking.

M-1.40 Contributions from New Development. The City shall require new development to construct or pay a proportionate share of the cost of improvements based on mobility-related impacts of the new development.

HCR-1.1 Archaeological, Tribal, and Cultural Resources. The City shall continue to comply with federal and State regulations and best practices aimed at protecting and mitigating impacts to archaeological resources and the broader range of cultural resources as well as tribal cultural resources.

HCR-1.17 Evaluation of Archeological Resources. The City shall work in good faith with interested communities to evaluate proposed development sites for the presence of sub-surface historic, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources that may be present at the site. These efforts may include the following: • Consideration of existing reports and studies, • Consultation with Native American tribes as required by State law, • Appropriate site-specific investigative actions, and • Onsite monitoring during excavation if appropriate.

Airport South
Industrial Project
Plan for Services
Prepared for
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission
April 2024
Prepared by
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services
Page i
April 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................ 1 I. PURPOSE STATEMENT .......................................................................................1 II. PLAN FOR SERVICES REQUIREMENTS...........................................................1 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................1 IV. AREAS OF SERVICE.............................................................................................6 V. SUMMARY.............................................................................................................6 B. AREAS OF SERVICE .............................................................................................................. 6 VI. WATER ...................................................................................................................6 VII. WASTEWATER....................................................................................................12 VIII. CIRCULATION AND ROADWAYS...................................................................15 IX. ANIMAL CARE....................................................................................................23 X. CODE ENFORCEMENT......................................................................................24 XI. POLICE PROTECTION........................................................................................25 XII. FIRE PROTECTION.............................................................................................28 XIII. SOLID WASTE.....................................................................................................32 XIV. STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL................................................35 XV. PARKS AND RECREATION...............................................................................44 XVI. LIBRARIES...........................................................................................................47 Attachments
Attachment A Targeted Municipal Services Review
Attachment B Preliminary Water Study
Attachment C Level 1 Sewer Study
Attachment D Local Transportation Analysis
Attachment E Preliminary Drainage Study
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following discussions include a purpose statement, detail the Plan for Services requirements, and provide further details of the Plan for Services requirements, project description, areas of study, and an overall summary.

I. PURPOSE STATEMENT
The purpose of this Plan for Services report is to provide an analysis of the public services that would serve the 474.4-acre project site proposed for Annexation as part of the Airport South Industrial Project (proposed project) into the City of Sacramento and Sacramento Area Sewer District (SacSewer) service area. This report will provide information to assist the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) in determining whether public services provided to the project site can be reasonably provided constructed, maintained, and financed.

The Cortese‐Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (see Government Code Sections 5600 through 57500) requires that a Plan for Services be prepared prior to “Changes of Organization or Reorganization.” The Plan for Services is a tool for Sacramento LAFCo to consider an update to the physical boundary and service area of a local agency and has been prepared to determine if services could adequately be extended to the project site without negatively affecting current service levels to existing recipients or rate structures.

II. PLAN FOR SERVICES REQUIREMENTS
The PFS requirements are based on the Cortese‐Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Section 56653, which stipulates the following:
(a) Whenever a local agency or school district submits a resolution of application for a change of organization or reorganization pursuant to this part, the local agency shall submit with the resolution of application a plan for providing services within the affected territory.
(b) The plan for providing services shall include all of the following information and any additional information required by the Commission or the Executive Officer:
(1) An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory.
(2) The level and range of those services.
(3) An indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory.
(4) An indication of any improvement or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed.
(5) Information with respect to how those services will be financed.

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project location, setting, and surrounding land uses, as well as the project components are discussed further below.

PLAN FOR SERVICES
APRIL 2024
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Project Location, Setting, and Surrounding Land Uses
The 474.4-acre project site is located to the southeast of the intersection of Interstate 5 (I-5) and Power Line Road within the Natomas area of unincorporated Sacramento County, California (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). The site is identified by Sacramento County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 225-0020-010, -016, -017, -021, -022, -023, -024, -026, -027, -030, -032, -033, -034, and -035, as well as 225-0030-023, -024, -045, and -048. The County’s General Plan designates the site as Agricultural Cropland and the site is zoned Agricultural 80 (AG-80). The site is bound to the north by I-5 and to the east by the City of Sacramento City limits. Within the northern portion of the site, Bayou Way, a paved road consisting of two vehicle lanes, meanders in a west-to-east direction through the site. The project site currently consists of vacant, fallow agricultural land.

The site was historically used as hay fields, with intermittent rice fields from 1937 until at least 2020. Unnamed drainage canals run roughly north-south in both the western and eastern portions of the site. Numerous unimproved dirt roads provide access to the interior of the project site, which is subdivided into multiple agricultural plots.

Surrounding existing land uses include a Life Storage facility and the Westlake single-family residential subdivision to the east; the West Drainage Canal, vacant agricultural land, open space land, and the Paso Verde K-8 School to the south; undeveloped agricultural land to the west; the Sacramento International Airport to the northwest, across I-5; and the Metro Air Park, Amazon SMF-1 Fulfillment Center, and the under-construction Northlake (Greenbriar) subdivision to the north, across I-5.

Project Components
The proposed project would include the development of an industrial park within an approximately 353.5-acre portion of the project site, located immediately south of Bayou Way (see Figure 3).

The industrial park would include construction of up to 5,204,500 square feet (sf) of industrial uses on approximately 235.6 acres (Parcels 1 through 5), as well as approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses on approximately 13.4 acres (Parcels 6A through 6C and 7A through 7C). The proposed project would also include five nonparticipating parcels, comprised of approximately 83 acres within the project site, that would receive first tier entitlements to facilitate future development of industrial uses of approximately 1,404,800 sf (Parcels 8 through 11, and California Department of Transportation [Caltrans] Remnant right-of-way (ROW). Finally, the project site includes 37.9 acres of Caltrans I-5 fee title ROW, which would not be developed as part of the proposed project.

In addition to the development of the industrial park and Annexation of the nonparticipating parcels, the proposed project would include access and internal circulation improvements; water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage improvements; and construction of an off-site force main to convey wastewater generated from the proposed uses to the 48-inch SacSewer North Natomas interceptor line in East Commerce Way. The proposed project would require the following approvals:
• Sacramento LAFCo approval of a Sphere of Influence (SOI) Amendment to amend the City of Sacramento SOI; and Annexation of the project site into the City limits and SacSewer service area;
• City of Sacramento approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Prezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD), Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Tax Exchange Agreement (with County).

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 2
Project Site Boundaries
Legend
Annexation/SOI Amendment Area
Approved SMF Master Plan
Metro Air Park
Existing City Limit Boundary
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 3
Airport South Industrial Park – Preliminary Site Plan
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
IV. AREAS OF SERVICE
In accordance with the Cortese‐Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, as well as in compliance with the Sacramento LAFCo Policies, Standards and Procedures Manual, the Plan for Services includes evaluation of the following categories of public services and utilities:
• Water;
• Wastewater;
• Circulation and Roadways;
• Animal Care;
• Code Enforcement;
• Police Protection;
• Fire Protection;
• Solid Waste;
• Storm Drainage and Flood Control;
• Parks and Recreation; and
• Libraries.

This report incorporates information contained in the Targeted Municipal Services Review (MSR) prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers (see Attachment A of this Plan for Services), 1 as well as information from the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) currently being prepared for the project by Raney Planning and Management, Inc.

V. SUMMARY
Responses have been provided for each of the foregoing infrastructure and public service areas, addressing the extension of service to the project site. This report provides Sacramento LAFCo a compilation of research and information that can be used for consideration of the proposed project. Based on the information contained herein, the following findings have been determined:

1. Services associated with all the foregoing areas of study identified above can be extended to serve the Airport South Industrial Project.

2. Service can be provided without interruption of existing service delivery levels and/or adverse impacts to the existing infrastructure system.

3. Adequate service can be provided by the City of Sacramento and SacSewer.

4. The project is not growth-inducing.

The proposed project would also be subject to applicable development impact fees to ensure that the project makes a fair-share contribution to funding future public service and utility upgrades and expansions that would be necessary for supporting the proposed project and benefit existing programs and facilities within the City of Sacramento.

B. AREAS OF SERVICE
The various public service and utility providers that would serve the proposed project are discussed further below.

VI. WATER
The project site is not currently provided potable water service, as the site does not contain structures necessitating water demand and has only limited utility infrastructure. Upon annexation 1 Wood Rodgers. Airport South Industrial Targeted Municipal Services Review, Sacramento, Local Agency Formation Commission. January 2024.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
into the City of Sacramento, the City would be responsible for providing water to the project site.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan2 contains guiding goals and policies related to water applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-3 Efficient, high-quality utility infrastructure and services to meet the needs of residents and business throughout the city.

Policy PFS-3.1 Provision of Adequate Utilities. The City shall continue to provide reliable water, wastewater, and stormwater drainage utility services.

Policy PFS-3.2 Utility Sustainability. The City shall continue to improve the sustainability, resilience, and energy efficiency of its facilities, infrastructure, and operations consistent with the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045.

Policy PFS-3.3 Development Impacts. Through the development review process, including through development impact fees and offsite improvements constructed by new development, the City shall ensure that adequate public utilities and services are available to serve new development.

Policy PFS-3.4 Water Distribution System Management. The City shall maintain and periodically update the Water Distribution System Master Plan to guide rehabilitation, replacement, and
management of the potable water distribution system.

Policy PFS-3.5 Water Treatment Capacity and Infrastructure. The City shall plan, secure funding for, and procure sufficient water treatment capacity and infrastructure to meet projected maximum daily water demands. Options to explore may include the following:
• Expansion or rehabilitation of existing treatment plant infrastructure;
• Development and management of groundwater wells;
and
• Collaboration on regional water supply solutions.

Policy PFS-3.7 Rate and Fee Studies. The City shall periodically conduct rate and fee studies to ensure adequate funds are collected to maintain and expand utility systems as needed to support projected growth, implementing rate and fee increases as needed.

Policy PFS-3.10 Meet Projected Needs. The City shall foster the orderly and efficient expansion of facilities and infrastructure to adequately 2 City of Sacramento. Sacramento 2040 General Plan. Adopted February 27, 2024.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
meet projected needs, comply with current and future
regulations, and maintain public health, safety, and welfare.

Infrastructure and facility planning should discourage oversizing of infrastructure that could induce growth at the edges of the city beyond what is anticipated in the General Plan.

Policy PFS-3.12 Safe and Compatible Utility Design. The City shall ensure that public utility facilities are designed to be safe and compatible with adjacent uses.

Policy PFS-3.13 Impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The City shall consider the impacts on environmentally sensitive areas and habitats when locating and designing municipal utilities.

Goal PFS-4 A reliable supply of high-quality water that meets projected needs within the city’s place of use.

Policy PFS-4.4 Groundwater Infrastructure. The City shall maintain investment in groundwater infrastructure to provide for water supply reliability. Groundwater sustainability, cost
effectiveness, and the quality of the resource shall be factored into groundwater investments.

Policy PFS-4.5 Comprehensive Water Supply Planning. The City shall prepare and implement an Urban Water Management Plan,
updating it on a 5-year cycle, to ensure a reliable, long-term water supply and service under projected future conditions.

Policy PFS-4.7 Water Supply During Emergencies. The City shall, to the extent feasible, maintain adequate water supply during
emergencies in accordance with the Water Master Plan and the Urban Water Management Plan.

Policy PFS-4.8 New Development. The City shall ensure that water supply capacity is in place prior to granting building permits for new development.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The City of Sacramento operates and maintains a 30-inch water transmission main in Bayou Way that terminates near the eastern boundary of the project site. The transmission main was originally constructed to “wheel” the City’s water through the County of Sacramento to nearby development areas, including the Sacramento International Airport and Metro Air Park, both located north of the project site, across I-5.

From the City’s existing 30-inch water transmission main in Bayou Way at the northeast corner of the project site, a new 12-inch water line would be extended towards the south along the site’s eastern boundary within the proposed “A” Drive (see Figure 4). From the “A” Drive/Airport South Industrial Drive intersection within the project site, the new 12-inch line would then extend westward into the project site and form a looped water system within Airport South Industrial Drive and the site’s western and northern property lines.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 4
Proposed City/County Water System
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
In total, the new on-site water infrastructure would connect to the City’s existing 30-inch transmission main at three points. In addition, the new on-site water distribution system would connect to an existing eight-inch water line at the southeast corner of the project site at Lanfranco Circle, which serves the Westlake subdivision to the east of the site. As part of the proposed project, ownership and maintenance of the existing 30-inch Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) transmission main along the northern boundary of Parcel 5 would be transferred to the City of Sacramento.

Installation of the new water supply infrastructure, including new fire water lines and hydrants, would occur either in existing road ROWs or in areas proposed for disturbance as part of development of the proposed project. The new water infrastructure would be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable standards set forth in Section 27 of the City of Sacramento Standard Specifications, ensuring the new water lines are constructed in conformance with proper materials and sizing. All necessary water conveyance infrastructure for the proposed project would be financed by the project applicant.

With respect to water supply to serve the proposed project and the City of Sacramento’s existing commitments, the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) includes a water service reliability assessment of the City’s projected supplies and demands during normal, single dry, and five consecutive dry years, which are presented in acre-feet per year (AFY). Under the various water year types, the total annual water supply sources available are compared to the total annual projected water use for the City’s water service area from 2025 to 2045 in five-year increments. Table 1 summarizes the supply and demand of each water year type provided in the 2020 UWMP. As shown therein, the City is projected to have a surplus of water supplies in all water year types through 2045. The demand anticipated to be generated by the proposed project is summarized in Table 2.

Table 1
Retail Water Supply and Demand During Normal, Single Dry, and Multiple Dry Years (AFY) in the Sacramento Service Area Hydrologic Condition 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Normal Year
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 108,432 114,809 121,187 127,564 133,942
Surplus 224,769 235,391 229,014 222,636 216,258
Single Dry Year
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 108,432 114,809 121,187 127,564 133,942
Surplus 224,769 235,391 229,014 222,636 216,258
Multiple Dry Year 1
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 108,432 114,809 121,187 127,564 133,942
Surplus 224,769 235,391 229,014 222,636 216,258
Multiple Dry Year 2
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 109,707 116,085 122,462 128,840 138,397
Surplus 223,493 234,116 227,738 221,360 211,803
(Continues on next page)
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Table 1
Retail Water Supply and Demand During Normal, Single Dry, and Multiple Dry Years (AFY) in the Sacramento Service Area Hydrologic Condition 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Multiple Dry Year 3
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 110,983 117,360 123,738 130,115 142,853
Surplus 222,218 232,840 226,463 220,085 207,347
Multiple Dry Year 4
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 112,258 118,636 125,013 131,391 147,308
Surplus 220,942 231,565 225,187 218,809 202,892
Multiple Dry Year 5
Supply Totals 333,200 350,200 350,200 350,200 350,200
Demand Totals 113,534 119,911 126,289 132,666 151,764
Surplus 219,667 230,289 223,912 217,534 198,436
Source: City of Sacramento 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, 2021.

Table 2
Proposed Project Water Demand Summary
Land Use Acres
Average Day Demand Unit Water Demand
AFY/Acre AFY
Commercial 13.4 2 26.8
Industrial 235.6 0.9 212.04
Nonparticipating 83 0.9 74.7
Total 332 -- 313.54
Source: Wood Rodgers, 2023.

Based on the data presented in Table 2, the total average daily demand for the proposed project would be 313.54 AFY. As shown in Table 1, the City is anticipated to have a surplus of water supplies in all hydrologic conditions through 2045, and the lowest projected surplus is expected to be 198,436 AFY in 2045 during the fifth consecutive year of drought.

Therefore, given the substantial amount of surplus projected for the City’s water supplies in all hydrologic conditions, the City’s existing water supplies would be able to accommodate the demand anticipated to be generated by the City’s existing commitments, as well as the water demand projected for the proposed project.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
The City of Sacramento currently has the water supply and municipal infrastructure in place to provide potable water to the project site. Specific improvements necessary to provide water service have been detailed in the Airport South Industrial Preliminary Water Study prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers (see Attachment B of this Plan for Services).
3 3 Wood Rodgers. Airport South Industrial Preliminary Water Study, City of Sacramento, California. May 11, 2023.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

3. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
The project applicant would be responsible for the extension of infrastructure to provide water service to the project site, which includes the design and construction of the new internal water lines, as described above. The aforementioned improvements are not dependent upon other City- or developer-funded projects. The improvements can be constructed at any time to provide water service to the proposed project.

4. Information With Respect to How the Services Will be Financed Funding and financing information for the on-site water improvements is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section. All water facilities would be constructed by the developer. Utility infrastructure for new development in the City of Sacramento is funded through development impact fees established by the City of Sacramento Department of Utilities. The current fee schedule for calculating development impact fees can be found on the City of Sacramento website at:
https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/utilities/development-standards/development-impactfees VII. WASTEWATER
The project site is not currently provided sewer conveyance and treatment services, as the site does not contain structures and has only limited utility infrastructure. Upon annexation into the City, the project site would be provided wastewater collection and treatment services by SacSewer. It should be noted that prior to December 26, 2023, SacSewer was represented by two independent special districts, a previous iteration of SacSewer and the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (Regional San). However, Sacramento LAFCo authorized a reorganization of the districts, dissolving the former SacSewer, annexing the district into Regional San, and subsequently naming the wastewater special district “Sacramento Area Sewer District.” An existing SacSewer trunk line is located within Greg Thatch Circle, to the east of State Route (SR) 99. From the existing trunk line, flows are conveyed to the 48-inch SacSewer North Natomas interceptor line, which connects with the trunk line to the southeast of the Club Center Drive/Hampton Falls Way intersection and proceeds south of Del Paso Road within East Commerce Way. In addition to the goals and policies listed above related to utilities in general, the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to wastewater applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-3 Efficient, high-quality utility infrastructure and services to meet the needs of residents and business throughout the city.

Policy PFS-3.6 Combined Sewer System Rehabilitation and Improvements. In keeping with its Combined Sewer System (CSS) Long Term Control Plan (LTCP), the City shall continue to rehabilitate and improve the CSS to decrease flooding, CSS outflows, and Combined System Overflows (CSOs). Through these improvements and requirements for new development, the City shall also ensure that development in the CSS area does not result in increased flooding, CSS outflows or CSOs or reduce the overall percentage of flow routed to the Sacramento River Water Treatment Plant (SRWTP).

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
Sanitary sewer conveyance service within the project site would be provided through a gravity system. New eight-inch sewer lines would be installed within the project site’s parcels, which would convey flows to a new sewer line in Airport South Industrial Drive ranging in diameter between 12 and 18 inches (see Figure 5). From the sewer line in Airport South Industrial Drive, flows would be directed to a new pump station sited within the proposed Lot F. From the new pump station, flows would be conveyed to the existing SacSewer North Natomas interceptor line by way of a force main that would extend from the northeast corner of the site and proceed towards the south within Bayou Way and El Centro Road.

At the El Centro Road/Del Paso Road intersection, the off-site force main would connect to the North Natomas interceptor line through one of three optional alignments. Each alignment option would require the force main to proceed east. Option 1 would include installation of the force main within a City highway buffer parallel with the westerly side of I-5.

About 0.5-mile south of Del Paso Road, the force main would cross under I-5 within City ROW and then discharge into the North Natomas interceptor line within East Commerce Way. Options 2 and 3 would route the force main either north or south of the I-5 on/off ramps, cross under I-5, and then proceed within Del Paso Road towards East Commerce Way in existing ROW and/or previously disturbed areas. The new sewer infrastructure would be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable standards set forth in the SacSewer Standards and Specifications, ensuring the new sewer lines and pump station are constructed in conformance with proper materials and sizing. All necessary sewer conveyance infrastructure for the proposed project would be financed by the project applicant.

According to the Airport South Industrial Level 1 Sewer Study (Sewer Study) prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers (see Attachment C of this Plan for Services), 4 the
sewer equivalent single-family dwelling units (ESD) that make up the sewer demand for the proposed project include approximately 81 ESDs of commercial units, 1,870 industrial (warehouse) ESDs, 516 detention basin ESDs, 152 ESDs of roadway/right-of-way (ROW), pump stations and buffer spaces. Based on the land use acreages proposed as part of the project and the aforementioned ESDs, the combined average dry-weather flow (ADWF) and peak wet-weather flow (PWWF) demand is expected to be 0.81 mgd and

2.09 mgd, respectively. The sewer pump station that would serve the proposed project would be developed in a single phase to meet the ultimate ADWF and PWWF. All sewer facilities would be permanent.

Collected wastewater is discharged into SacSewer’s interceptor system and treated at the district’s Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SRWTP) located in South Sacramento County. Wastewater is treated to a tertiary standard and discharged into the Sacramento River; however, some effluent is used by the City of Elk Grove for landscape irrigation. The SRWTP is permitted to treat ADWF of 181 mgd. Since the opening of the SRWTP, system improvements have been made to accommodate regional growth and to add capacity to SacSewer’s interceptor system.
4 Wood Rodgers. Airport South Industrial Level 1 Sewer Study. November 2022.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 5
Schematic Sewer System Layout
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
In 2014, the SRWTP’s ADWF was approximately 141 mgd. Although future growth in the SacSewer service area will increase demands for wastewater service and use the remaining capacity of the SRWTP, regional water conservation efforts have resulted in a reduction in water use, which has in turn, increased the available capacity at the SRWTP.

For instance, SacSewer anticipates per capita water consumption to decline through the continued installation of water meters and water conservation measures. As such, a substantial amount of additional water conservation is expected throughout SacSewer’s service area, and the wastewater treatment provider expects the existing 181 mgd ADWF capacity to be sufficient through 2050. Accordingly, the SRWTP would maintain sufficient capacity to treat wastewater flows generated by the proposed project, in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
SacSewer currently has the wastewater treatment capacity and municipal infrastructure in place to provide wastewater conveyance and treatment services to the project site.

Specific improvements necessary to provide wastewater service have been detailed in the Sewer Study prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers.

3. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
The project applicant would be responsible for the extension of infrastructure to provide wastewater conveyance and treatment services to the project site, which includes the design and construction of the new internal sewer lines and off-site force main alignment, as described above. The aforementioned improvements are not dependent upon other City- or developer-funded projects. The improvements can be constructed at any time to provide wastewater conveyance and treatment services to the proposed project.

4. Information With Respect to How the Services Will be Financed Funding and financing information for the on-site sewer lines and off-site force main alignment is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section. All wastewater facilities would be constructed by the developer. As previously discussed, utility infrastructure for new development in the City of Sacramento is funded through development impact fees established by the City of Sacramento Department of Utilities.

VIII. CIRCULATION AND ROADWAYS
The following are the existing roadways located within the project vicinity:
• Interstate 5: I-5 is a north-south freeway facility serving local and interregional traffic within the Sacramento region. I-5 primarily links South Sacramento, the Central Business District in Downtown Sacramento, Natomas, and the Sacramento International Airport. I-5 is also used as a primary route for long-distance traffic, including truck traffic. I-5 is generally about two to four lanes in each direction in the project vicinity. • Power Line Road: Power Line Road is a north-south minor collector, perpendicular to I-5, located along the west side of the project site. To the north, the roadway intersects with Bayou Way and passes over I-5. To the south, Power Line Road intersects with Del Paso Road and ends at Garden Highway. Power Line Road has one lane in each direction with narrow, unpaved shoulders.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
• Bayou Way: Bayou Way is an east-west local rural road located on the north side of the project site. To the west, the roadway intersects with Power Line Road. To the east, Bayou Way intersects with Metro Air Parkway and continues to the Westlake neighborhood, where the roadway becomes El Centro Road. Bayou Way has one lane in each direction.

East of the project site, El Centro Road is separated by a painted median and has painted bike lanes in both directions.
• Del Paso Road: Del Paso Road is an east-west minor arterial located approximately 0.5- mile south of the project site. To the west, the roadway intersects with Power Line Road.

To the east, Del Paso Road intersects Hovnanian Drive and bisects the suburban Westlake and Sundance Lake neighborhoods. To the east, the roadway is a major arterial and has ramps connected to I-5. The segment of the roadway directly to the south of the project site has one lane in each direction. To the east, the roadway expands to three lanes in each direction with additional left-turn lanes and a raised median. • El Centro Road: El Centro Road is a north-south arterial located approximately 0.5-mile east of the project site. El Centro Road is a planned four-lane minor arterial. To the north, the roadway becomes a two-lane facility to Bayou Way. To the south, the roadway intersects with Del Paso Road and runs alongside the suburban neighborhoods of Westlake and Sundance Lake. North of Del Paso Road, the roadway has two southbound lanes, one northbound lane, and a raised median with left-turn lanes. To the south of Del Paso Road, the roadway has two lanes in each direction with a raised median. • Metro Air Parkway: Metro Air Parkway is a north-south arterial perpendicular to I-5 that bisects the project site. Metro Air Parkway intersects Bayou Way to the south, passes over I-5, and continues north to intersect with West Elkhorn Boulevard. Within the project area, Metro Air Parkway currently has one lane per direction and is being widened to have two lanes in each direction. In the future, the roadway is anticipated to be widened to three lanes in each direction. Metro Air Parkway is considered a thoroughfare within the County. • Elkhorn Boulevard: Elkhorn Boulevard is an east-west major arterial located north of the project site. To the east, Elkhorn Boulevard connects with SR 99. To the west, Elkhorn Boulevard connects with Power Line Road. Elkhorn Boulevard is currently one lane per direction except in front of Northlake, where the roadway has three eastbound lanes and two westbound lanes. Elkhorn Boulevard is anticipated to be widened as a six-lane major arterial/thoroughfare.

The pedestrian system in the project site vicinity consists of sidewalks along Del Paso Road and El Centro Road as the roadways pass through the Sundance Lake and Westlake neighborhoods, as well as an internal trail system within the neighborhoods. In addition, a sidewalk is located along Bayou Way just east of the project site, associated with the existing self-storage facility.

Pedestrian facilities are not currently located along the project site frontage, as the location is currently undeveloped.

The bicycle system in the site vicinity consists of infrastructure around the Westlake and Sundance Lake neighborhoods. The bicycle system consists of a Class I bike path and Class II bike lanes to the south and east of the project site.

The project area is served by the local Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) bus service (Routes 13 and 142) as well as North Natomas Jibe (Lines 171 and 174). SacRT Bus Route 13 operates along Del Paso Road, south of the project site, and SacRT Bus Route 142, which is a peak-only line, operates along I-5 and stops north of the project site. North Natomas Jibe Line 171 passes along the project site on Callison Drive, and North Natomas Jibe Line 174 operates on Del Paso Road southeast of the project site. However, Jibe Line 174 does not include any stops in the Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
vicinity of the site. Jibe routes have traditionally run from Natomas to Downtown Sacramento during the morning peak hour and from Downtown Sacramento to Natomas during the afternoon peak hour. However, it should be noted that, due to continued low ridership caused by the COVID19 pandemic, the North Natomas Jibe has suspended all service. It should also be noted that while the project site is not currently served by SacRT Light Rail Transit (LRT), as outlined in the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS), a future SacRT LRT Green Line station is planned within 0.5-mile of the project boundary at Elkhorn Blvd and Power Line Road.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to circulation and roadways applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Mobility Element
Goal M-1 An equitable, sustainable multimodal system that provides a range of viable and healthy travel choices for users of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities.

Policy M-1.1 Street Classification System. The City shall maintain a street classification system that considers the role of streets as corridors for movement but prioritizes a context-sensitive Complete Streets concept that enables connected, comfortable, and convenient travel for those walking, rolling, and taking transit.

Policy M-1.2 User Prioritization. The City shall prioritize mobility, comfort, health, safety, and convenience for those walking, followed by those bicycling and riding transit, ahead of design and operations for those driving.

Policy M-1.5 Street Design Standards. The City shall maintain street design and operations standards that prioritize comfort and travel time for walking, bicycling, and transit, while managing vehicle speeds and traffic volumes, updating them as best practices evolve.

Policy M-1.6 Transit Integration. Wherever feasible, the City shall design buildings, the public realm, streets, and pedestrian access to integrate transit into existing neighborhoods and proposed developments and destinations such as schools, employment centers, commercial centers, major attractions, and public walking spaces to improve access for users by transit.

Policy M-1.11 Increase Bicycling and Walking. The City shall strive to increase bicycling and walking citywide so that it can meet its equity, reduced vehicle miles traveled, and sustainability goals.

Policy M-1.12 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station Access Improvements.

Through the development approval process and public and private investments, the City shall foster additional walking and bicycling connections to light rail stations and strengthen existing connections to enhance first/last-mile connectivity and make it easier to travel between the station and surrounding Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
neighborhoods and destinations. As feasible, connections should include pedestrian-level streetlighting and tree shading.

Policy M-1.13 Walkability. The City shall design streets to prioritize walking by including design elements such as the following:
• Grid networks that provide high levels of connectivity; • Closely spaced intersections;
• Frequent and low-stress crossings;
• Wide, unobstructed walkable sidewalks;
• Separation from vehicle traffic;
• Street trees that provide shading; and
• Minimal curb cuts.

Policy M-1.16 Barrier Removal. The City shall remove barriers to walking, where feasible, and work with utility companies to remove barriers to allow people of all abilities to move with comfort and convenience throughout the city, including through the
following:
• Provision of curb ramps, crosswalks, and overpasses;
• Relocation of infrastructure or street furniture that impedes travel pathways;
• Reducing or consolidating driveways and curb cuts;
• Providing long and short-term bicycle and scooter
parking to minimize sidewalk obstructions; and
• Creation of additional walking entrances to important destinations like schools, parks, and commercial areas.

Policy M-1.21 Extension of Transit Service. The City shall coordinate with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) to plan for the extension of frequent transit service and other related transit improvements that are comfortable, convenient, and
interconnected from the Greater Land Park, North Natomas, Pocket/Greenhaven, South Area, and South Natomas
Community Plan Areas to areas with concentrated employment.

This may include frequent bus service provided by SacRT as an interim solution along routes ultimately planned for light rail service.

Policy M-1.39 Maintain the Street System. The City shall maintain streets and shared-use paths using a pavement management system and maintenance program for public streets and shared-use paths throughout the city based on available funding.

Policy M-1.40 Contributions from New Development. The City shall require new development to construct or pay a proportionate share of the cost of improvements based on mobility-related impacts of the new development.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Goal M-2 Reduced reliance on single-occupant vehicles.

Policy M-2.1 Transportation Demand Management (TDM). The City should promote the greater use of Transportation Demand Management strategies by employers and residents to reduce dependence on single-occupancy vehicles with the target that 17 percent of all trips are made by transit and active
transportation modes by 2030 and 23 percent of all trips are made by transit and active transportation modes by 2045.

Policy M-2.2 Wider Participation. The City should encourage Transportation Management Associations (TMAs), public
agencies, major employers, and school districts to expand and increase participation in programs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and increase regional average vehicle
occupancy. When designing rewards and incentives, prioritize opportunities to support local businesses.

Policy M-2.3 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric. Consistent with state law, the City shall evaluate transportation California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts using vehicle miles traveled or other metrics as determined by the City, and shall not rely on automobile delay, as described by level of service or similar measures of vehicular delay as a measure of
environmental significance. Local Transportation Analyses (LTA) shall continue to be required when necessary to aid in conditioning project entitlements for needed operational improvements.

Policy M-2.4 Shared Shuttles. The City shall encourage employers to partner with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) and local Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) to connect employment areas with the multimodal transit stations, light rail stations, and other major destinations, and to offer employees training and incentives for use of shuttles.

Goal M-3 Streets designed and maintained as places that contribute to quality of life.

Policy M-3.3 Traffic. The City shall support planning and managing traffic from the perspective of the adjacent uses, using traffic management and traffic calming techniques.

Goal M-4 A safer transportation system.

Policy M-4.1 Application of Safety. The City shall design, plan, and operate streets using complete streets principles to ensure the safety and mobility of all users.

Policy M-4.7 Integrated Goods Movement. The City shall work to ensure that the goods movement sector is integrated with the rest of Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
the transportation system in such a way that does not endanger the health and safety of residents and other roadway users.

Goal M-5 Connections to the regional transportation network that facilitates the movement of people and goods.

Policy M-5.6 Goods Movement Facilities. The City shall support improvements to regional goods movement facilities that facilitate local economic development and limit environmental impacts, including investments in technology, such as
blockchain, that improve tracking and coordination at intermodal freight facilities.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
Access to the project site would be provided from the north by Metro Air Parkway, which would extend southward into the project site and connect to the proposed Airport South Industrial Drive, providing a direct connection for trucks. The proposed project would include abandonment of the existing South Bayou Way within the project site boundaries.

Concurrent with abandonment, an access easement would be dedicated over the eastern segment of South Bayou Way. In addition, “A” Drive would extend to the north from Airport South Industrial Drive along a portion of the eastern site boundary and connect to a new roundabout at the northeastern corner of the project site. The roundabout is anticipated to have signage and be configured to prohibit off-site truck traffic from the project site, east and south along Bayou Way/El Centro Road to Del Paso Road.

With respect to new vehicle trips generated by the proposed project, as traffic volumes increase, vehicle queues typically also increase at most intersections. A summary of freeway ramp termini intersection queueing analyses under Baseline and Baseline with Project conditions is presented in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. As noted in the tables, red bolded text indicates an operational deficiency either caused by or exacerbated by the project. However, as shown in Table 4, while operational deficiencies exist at the Metro Air Parkway and I-5 northbound ramps at the northbound left lane and the Metro Air Parkway and I-5 southbound ramps at the southbound left lane during both the AM and PM peak hour under the Baseline with Project condition, such deficiencies would not be caused by or exacerbated by the proposed project.

Table 3
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

1. Airport Blvd and I-5
northbound ramps WBL 1,350 20 1,350 20

2. Airport Blvd and I-5
southbound ramps EBL/EBR 1,375 60 1,375 60
(Continues on next page)
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Table 3
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

3. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 northbound
ramps
WBL/WBT 1,575 35 1,575 25
WBR 160 145 160 105
NBL 160 60 160 20

4. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 southbound
ramps
EBL/EBR 1,600 115 1,600 50
SBR 130 90 130 90

9. Del Paso Road and
I-5 northbound ramps
NBL 1,270 295 1,270 295
NBR 1,270 320 1,270 380

10. Del Paso Road and
I-5 southbound ramps
SBL 1,100 105 1,100 125
SBR 250 120 250 80

13. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
northbound ramps
NBL 1,525 145 1,525 85

14. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
southbound ramps
SBL 400 85 400 165
SBR 1,480 115 1,480 85
Note: EB = eastbound; EBL = eastbound left; EBR = eastbound right; ft = feet; NB = northbound; NBL = northbound left; NBR = northbound right; SB = southbound; SBL = southbound left; SBR = southbound right; WB = westbound; WBL = westbound left; WBR = westbound right Black bolded results indicate an operational deficiency. Red bolded results indicate an operational deficiency either caused by or exacerbated by the project. Values rounded up to the nearest multiple of five.

Source: DKS, 2023.

Table 4
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Plus Project Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

1. Airport Blvd and I-5
northbound ramps WBL 1,350 20 1,350 20

2. Airport Blvd and I-5
southbound ramps EBL/EBR 1,375 75 1,375 60

3. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 northbound
ramps
WBL 350 270 350 175
WBT/WBR 1,575 180 1,575 180
NBL 100 150 100 145

4. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 southbound
ramps
NBT 875 220 875 245
SBT 700 330 700 305
(Continues on next page)
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Table 4
Queuing at Freeway Ramp Termini During Peak Hours —
Baseline Plus Project Condition
Intersection /
Analysis Scenario Movement
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Available
Storage
(feet)
95th %
Queue
(feet)

9. Del Paso Road and
I-5 northbound ramps

4. Metro Air Parkway
and I-5 southbound
ramps
SBR 650 100 650 95
EBL 1,600 135 1,600 115

10. Del Paso Road and
I-5 southbound ramps
EBR 170 95 170 45
NBL 300 200 300 220

13. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
northbound ramps
NBT 470 205 470 240

14. West Elkhorn
Boulevard and SR 99
southbound ramps
SBT 840 405 840 260
SBR 130 255 130 185
Notes: EB = eastbound; EBL = eastbound left; EBR = eastbound right; ft = feet; NB = northbound; NBL = northbound left; NBR = northbound right; SB = southbound; SBL = southbound left; SBR = southbound right; WB = westbound; WBL = westbound left; WBR = westbound right Black bolded results indicate an operational deficiency. Red bolded results indicate an operational deficiency either caused by or exacerbated by the project. Values rounded up to the nearest multiple of five.

Source: DKS, 2023.

Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are not currently located along the project site frontage, as the location is currently undeveloped. As such, the proposed project would not adversely affect existing pedestrian or bicycle facilities. In addition, the proposed project would be required through Mitigation Measure 4.12-2 of the EIR to construct pedestrian and bicycle facilities along the project site’s frontage in accordance with applicable City standards; Class IV separated bicycle facilities within the proposed cross-section to provide separation between cyclists and heavy truck traffic; connection of the bicycle network to the existing and planned City and County bikeway system, including, but not limited to, Bayou Way at the northeast corner of the site, the Class I bikeway at the southeast corner of the site, and Metro Air Parkway north of I-5; and the off-street Class IV cycle track shown on the eastern side of the site in the City of Sacramento Bikeway Master Plan. With respect to transit facilities, the proposed project would not include features that would conflict with existing or planned transit services.

2. Roadway Level of Service Criteria
Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions at an intersection or road segment. The level of service generally describes the conditions in terms of average delay per vehicle. Six levels of service are defined and given letter designations from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
According to the Local Transportation Analysis prepared for the proposed project by DKS Associates (see Attachment D of this Plan for Services), 5 of the 43 intersections evaluated,
the Del Paso Road/East Commerce Way intersection is the only study intersection where operations would deteriorate below the City’s LOS threshold as a result of the proposed project under the Baseline with Project condition. However, the LOS effects associated with the Baseline with Project condition assumes full buildout of the industrial park and nonparticipating parcels, which is applied against the Baseline condition. Given that full buildout of the proposed project is anticipated to occur over multiple years with additional roadway improvements constructed off-site, the Local Transportation Analysis concludes that effects associated with the Baseline with Project condition could be phased, as needed, with subsequent review and analysis. Additionally, the Local Transportation Analysis found that all evaluated roadway segments would operate at acceptable LOS under Baseline and Baseline with Project conditions.

3. Information With Respect to How the Services Will be Financed Funding and financing information for the proposed circulation improvements is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section. All circulation facilities would be constructed by the developer. This includes design and construction where required, or payment of in lieu fees. Roadway construction would be phased as the project develops.

IX. ANIMAL CARE
Animal Care services for the County lands surrounding the project site are currently provided by Sacramento County Animal Care Services, located at 3839 Bradshaw Road, one mile south of U.S. Route 50 (US-50). Within the City limits, the City of Sacramento operates the Front Street Animal Shelter, located at the Front Street/Broadway intersection.

Regulations and standards regarding animal care are set forth in the Sacramento City Code Section 9.44. Enforcement is handled by the Animal Care Services Division of the Public Works Department, with support from police and other County departments regarding issues of public health and safety related to dangerous or stray animals.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The City of Sacramento Animal Care Services include low-cost vaccination clinics, spay and neuter clinics, veterinary care, a pet food pantry, euthanasia services, pet licensing, adoption, boarding, lost and found pet services, and informative resources. The Front Street shelter maintains a full staff of veterinarians, service administrators, field operators, and staff who assist with animal detention, shelter, care, and placement of stray and licensed pets. Animal care also coordinates with other agencies in response to public safety, emergency, and law enforcement needs regarding animals. Animal Care Services are paid for through the City’s General Fund, supplemented by donations and fundraising from animal care groups.
5 DKS Associates. Sacramento Airport South Industrial Development Local Transportation Analysis. February 5, 2024.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
The proposed project consists of industrial and commercial development that is not anticipated to affect capacity or demand for animal care services in the City of Sacramento. Improvements to animal care services in the City would not be necessary as a result of the proposed project.

X. CODE ENFORCEMENT
The Sacramento Code Compliance Division provides code enforcement services for the City’s neighborhoods, businesses, entertainment, and housing. The Code Compliance Division’s overarching goal is to preserve and enhance public health, safety, and welfare by addressing issues of blight and enforcing City and State codes. The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to code enforcement applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Historic and Cultural Resources Element
Goal HCR-2 A comprehensive, citywide preservation program that identifies, protects, and assists in the preservation of Sacramento’s historic and cultural resources.

Policy HCR-2.5 Code Compliance. The City’s Code Enforcement, Building, and Preservation Planning Division staff shall work
collaboratively to identify historic properties under code enforcement actions and facilitate repair work that brings historic properties into compliance, consistent with preservation best practices, including utilizing the State Historical Building Code to support preservation goals.

Environmental Resources and Constraints Element
Goal ERC-7 Protection of life and property from seismic hazards.

Policy ERC-7.2 Seismic Stability. In accordance with the California Building Code, the City shall regulate structures intended for human occupancy to ensure they are designed and constructed to retain their structural integrity when subjected to seismic activity.

Goal ERC-10 A healthy sound environment conducive to living and working.

Policy ERC-10.9 Construction Noise Controls. The City shall limit the potential noise impacts of construction activities on surrounding land uses through noise regulations in the City Code that address permitted days and hours of construction, types of work, construction equipment, and sound attenuation devices.

Mobility Element
Goal M-1 An equitable, sustainable multimodal system that provides a range of viable and healthy travel choices for users of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Policy M-1.36 Electric Vehicles (EVs) in New Development. The City shall support minimum levels of EV infrastructure readiness and installation in new development and incentivize additional levels of EV charging, and EV car share, beyond City Code minimums.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The following services fall under the jurisdiction of the Code Compliance Division:
• Business Compliance: Works with City departments to issue permits and licenses and enforces codes and ordinances, including tobacco retailer licenses, entertainment permits, taxi permits, and mobile food permits. • Housing and Dangerous Buildings: Enforces City and State codes related to residential and commercial structures and addresses pests and mechanical noise. • Anti-Graffiti Program: Works with the Sacramento Police Department (SPD) to carry out efforts to keep neighborhoods clear of graffiti and implements abatement programs, educational outreach, and community involvement programs.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
Although a need for code enforcement would be expanded due to the inclusion of the project site within the City limits, such inclusion would be at a level sustainable to the City.

Currently, the City and the Sacramento Fire Department (SFD) review projects for compliance with State and local code requirements; however, City code enforcement would vary slightly, depending upon what the City and SFD deem most relevant regarding public safety. Facility upgrades are not anticipated to be required for the Sacramento Code Compliance Division as a result of the proposed project, which would be entirely new development and built to the City’s latest standards in compliance State and local regulations. As the nonparticipating parcels are eventually developed, they would also be constructed in conformance with the State and local regulations in effect at the time of construction.

3. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
Code enforcement services to the project site would be provided consistent with the development and occupation of the proposed structures.

4. Information with Respect to How the Services will be Financed The proposed project would contribute to the City’s funding of the Code Compliance Division through revenues generated from payment of application fees for applicable permits and clearances by new development and local taxes. Additional funding and financing information related to code enforcement services that would be provided to the proposed project is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section.

XI. POLICE PROTECTION
The project site is currently located within the unincorporated portion of Sacramento County, which is provided law enforcement services by the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office. Upon annexation into the City of Sacramento, the site would be served by the SPD. The SPD provides Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
police protection services within the City limits and is staffed with approximately 686 sworn personnel, 29 academy recruits, 291 professional staff, and 144 non-career staff.6 The SPD is managed by the Chief of Police, as well as three Deputy Chiefs and a captain who oversee the Offices of Operations, Investigations, and Specialized Services.

The SPD is headquartered at the City’s Public Safety Center at 5770 Freeport Boulevard and is supported by several substations throughout the City. The substations include the William J.

Kinney Police Facility, which serves the SPD’s North Area from 3550 Marysville Boulevard; the Joseph E. Rooney Police Facility, which serves the SPD’s South Area from 5303 Franklin Boulevard; and the Central Command Richards Police Facility, which is located at 300 Richards Boulevard.

The North Area substation provides police services to the northern portion of the City, from the American River to the south, to the City limits to the west, north, and east. The South Area substation provides police protection services to the southern portion of the City, from US-50 to the north, to the City limits to the west, south, and east. The Central Command Richards Police Facility provides police response to three main beats in the central portion of the City, which are bounded by the American River to the north, US-50 to the south, the Sacramento River to the west, and the City limits to the east. The nearest police substation to the project site is the Central Command Richards Police Facility, which is located approximately 5.4 miles to the southeast of the site.

The SPD does not have an adopted officer-to-resident ratio. The department uses geographic information systems (GIS) data, call and crime frequency information, and available personnel to rebalance its deployment on an annual basis in order to meet the changing demands of the City.

The SPD maintains an unofficial goal of 2.0 to 2.5 sworn police officers per 1,000 residents and one civilian support staff per two sworn officers.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to police protection applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-1 Responsive police and fire services that ensure a high level of public safety.

Policy PFS-1.1 Crime and Law Enforcement. The City shall continue to work cooperatively with the community, regional law enforcement agencies, local government agencies, and other entities to provide quality police service that protects the long-term health, safety, and well-being of the community.

Policy PFS-1.2 Community-Based Policing. The City shall continue to employ community-based policing strategies and encourage the
establishment of neighborhood watch programs in partnerships with community groups to address neighborhood crime.

Policy PFS-1.5 CPTED Strategies. The City shall continue to promote Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies in the design of new developments, including the following:
6 The Targeted MSR’s statistics are based on 2019 staffing levels. Additionally, it should be noted that the SPD was authorized to staff 747 sworn positions and 323.46 professional staff positions during fiscal year 2019/2020.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
• Provision of adequate public lighting;
• Windows overlooking streets and parking lots; and
• The creation of paths to increase pedestrian activity within both private development projects and public
facilities to enhance public safety.

Policy PFS-1.9 Equipment, Facilities, and Staffing. The City shall locate and maintain police and fire equipment, facilities, and staffing at locations and levels that allow for effective service delivery.

Policy PFS-1.12 Cooperative Delivery of Services. The City shall maintain mutual aid relationships with the County of Sacramento and other local, State, and federal agencies that promote regional cooperation in the delivery of services and allow for
supplemental aid from other police and fire personnel in the event of emergencies.

Policy PFS-1.14 Timing of Services. The City shall monitor the pace of residential and commercial growth in Sacramento and make best efforts to match that growth with commensurate increases in public safety personnel, equipment, and facilities.

Policy PFS-1.15 Development Fees for Facilities and Services. The City shall require development projects to contribute fees to ensure the provision of adequate police and fire services.

Policy PFS-1.16 Development Review. The City shall continue to require new development projects to incorporate safety features and include the Sacramento Police Department (SPD) and the Sacramento Fire Department (SFD) in the development review process to ensure that projects are designed and operated in a manner that minimizes the potential for criminal activity and fire hazards and maximizes the potential for responsive police and fire services.

5. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The nearest police substation to the project site is the Central Command Richards Police Facility, which is located at 300 Richards Boulevard, approximately 5.4 miles to the southeast of the site. The SPD does not have an adopted officer-to-resident ratio.

Unofficially, the SPD maintains an unofficial goal of 2.0 to 2.5 sworn police officers per 1,000 residents and one civilian support staff per two sworn officers. Additionally, the Sacramento General Plan does not establish a specific response time standard for emergency calls for the SPD.

Development of the proposed project is estimated to result in a total of approximately 4,000 employees. Conservatively estimating that all permanent positions associated with the project would be filled by new residents to the Sacramento region would result in a 0.7 Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
percent increase to the existing City population.7 While such an increase could incrementally increase demand for police protection services by the SPD, given the relatively short distance of the Central Command Richards Police Facility to the project site, the SPD would be able to capably respond to service calls from the project site. In addition, General Plan Policy PFS 1.15 establishes the City’s commitment to ensuring the SPD has the necessary levels of facilities, equipment, and staffing to adequately provide police protection services to the SPD service area. The City funds the SPD budget, in part, through revenues generated from payment of application fees for applicable permits and clearances by new development. In addition, new development within the City is subject to applicable development impact fees to ensure a fair-share contribution is made to finance the purchase of new or expansion of existing SPD facilities, apparatus, and equipment necessary for the purposes of maintaining adequate service levels. The project site is currently contiguous with the City’s North Natomas Finance Plan Area. As part of project approval, the proposed project would be subject to the North Natomas Planning Area Development Fees. Pursuant to Sacramento City Code Section 18.24.050, the North Natomas Planning Area Public Facilities Fee is assessed at a rate of $238,272 per net acre for Convenience Commercial uses; $140,361 per net acre for Community Commercial uses; and between $49,752 and $57,527 per net acre for Light Industrial uses. Thus, through payment of the North Natomas Planning Area Development Fees, buildout of the project site with the proposed uses would include a fair-share contribution to the City for the provision of SPD services to the site.

Finally, the development standards established by Sacramento City Code Section

17.220.250 for the Industrial PUD (M-1-PUD) zoning district require compliance with the City’s wall, fence, and gate regulations, which are set forth in Sacramento City Code Chapter 17.620. The aforementioned regulations allow for enhanced fencing materials capable of providing additional security for nonresidential structures and requirements for gated entrances. Such features would reduce the demand for police protection services associated with the proposed project. Thus, any increase in demand generated by the project, including new residents indirectly attracted to the City by the project, could be accommodated by the SPD.

6. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
SPD services to the project site would be provided consistent with the development timeline of the proposed project, with police staffing and facilities expanding incrementally.

7. Information with Respect to How the Services will be Financed The City funds the SPD budget, in part, through revenues generated from payment of application fees for applicable permits and clearances by new development. The proposed project would also be subject to development impact fees, as set forth by Sacramento City Code Section 18.24.050. Additional funding and financing information related to police protection services that would be provided to the proposed project is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section.

XII. FIRE PROTECTION
The project site is currently provided fire protection services by the SFD, which provides fire protection services to the City of Sacramento, as well as adjacent areas in unincorporated 7 Based on 2019 population total for the City of Sacramento presented in the Land Use and Planning/Population and Housing chapter of this EIR.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Sacramento County. The SFD’s service area consists of approximately 99.2 square miles within the City limits and 47.1 square miles in Sacramento County, including two contract areas for the Pacific Fruitridge Fire Protection District and Natomas Fire Protection District. The department is a full-service fire department, with the responsibility for responding to and mitigating incidents involving fires, medical emergencies, hazardous material incidents, and water rescue within its service area.

The SFD also provides a full range of support services, including fire prevention, public education, fire investigation, and domestic preparedness planning and response. The department participates in an automatic aid agreement with neighboring fire jurisdictions, as well as State and federal agencies. The SFD has 678 budgeted personnel positions that respond to approximately 90,000 calls and provide service to approximately 480,000 residents and more than 20,000 businesses in the City.8 At full staffing levels, the SFD daily operation staff consists of a total of 173 on-duty personnel for fire and emergency medical service (EMS) first responder emergencies, 34 of which are on duty for emergency ambulance transportation. The SFD maintains a goal to have its first responding company, which provides for fire suppression and paramedic services, arrive within four minutes.

The SFD is organized into the following divisions:
• Fire Administrative Services, which is responsible for departmental support of budget, revenues, accounts payable, procurement, contracts, council reports and grants, and various personnel services;
• Fire/Emergency Medical Services, which responds to fires, rescues, hazardous materials incidents, wildland fires, and other emergencies and medical services; • Office of the Chief, which is responsible for developing and providing the department’s overall direction;
• Technical Services, which provides essential support functions to all divisions, including equipment acquisition and repair, information technology, facility maintenance and repair coordination, and fleet maintenance. The division also enforces fire codes and ordinances, conducts plan reviews and construction inspections, and investigates fires; and • Training/Professional Standards, which is responsible for essential fire recruit training including in-service, continuing education, and outreach/recruitment.

The SFD is headquartered at the City’s Public Safety Center, located at 5770 Freeport Boulevard in Sacramento. The facility also serves as the SPD’s headquarters. The SFD operates 24 fire stations, which are strategically located throughout the City. The nearest SFD station to the project site is Station 43, which is located at 4201 El Centro Road, approximately 2.5 miles southeast of the site. Although each SFD station operates within a specific response district encompassing the immediate geographical area around the station, all of the fire agencies within Sacramento County (i.e., SFD, Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District, Sac Airport Fire, Cosumnes Community Services District Fire Department, and the Folsom Fire Department) share an automatic aid agreement that allows response from the closest fire unit regardless of jurisdiction.

The nearest existing fire station in Sacramento County to the project site is the Sac Airport Fire station, located at the Sacramento International Airport, approximately 2.1 miles to the north of the project site.

All but one of the SFD engine companies are staffed with four personnel, consisting of a Company Officer (captain), engineer, and two firefighters. The remaining engine company, located at 8 The Targeted MSR’s statistics are based on 2017 SFD staffing levels.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Station 3 in the rural portion of the contracted Natomas Fire Protection District, is staffed with three personnel (a captain, an engineer, and a firefighter). In addition, SFD truck companies and the department’s lone rescue company are also staffed with personnel that are identical to the four-person engine companies. Ambulances are staffed with two firefighters/paramedics or a firefighter/paramedic and firefighter/emergency medical technician (EMT) combination.

Metro Air Park, a master planned industrial development, is also scheduled to provide land and facilities for a new fire station near the project site. The 10,000-square-foot (sf) fire station will be located approximately 1.4 miles north of the site and operated by the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District. Construction of the facility is planned at such time that Metro Air Park reaches 30 percent buildout.

In addition to the goals and policies listed above related to first-responder services in general, the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to fire protection applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-1 Responsive police and fire services that ensure a high level of public safety.

Policy PFS-1.6 Fire Prevention Programs and Suppression. The City shall deliver fire prevention programs that protect the public through education, adequate inspection of existing development, and incorporation of fire safety features in new development.

Policy PFS-1.7 Water Supply for Fire Suppression. The City shall ensure that adequate water supplies are available for fire suppression throughout the city and shall require development to construct all necessary fire suppression infrastructure and equipment.

Policy PFS-1.8 Fire Hazards. The City shall continue to require private property owners to remove excessive/overgrown vegetation (e.g., trees, shrubs, weeds) and rubbish to the satisfaction of the Fire Department to prevent and minimize fire risks to surrounding properties. The City shall continue to remove
excessive/overgrown vegetation from City-owned property.

Policy PFS-1.7 Water Supply for Fire Suppression. The City shall ensure that adequate water supplies are available for fire suppression throughout the city and shall require development to construct all necessary fire suppression infrastructure and equipment.

Policy PFS-1.8 Fire Hazards. The City shall continue to require private property owners to remove excessive/overgrown vegetation (e.g., trees, shrubs, weeds) and rubbish to the satisfaction of the Fire Department to prevent and minimize fire risks to surrounding properties. The City shall continue to remove
excessive/overgrown vegetation from City-owned property.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The nearest SFD fire station to the project site is Station 43, which is located at 4201 El Centro Road, approximately 2.5 miles southeast of the site. Although each of SFD’s 24 fire stations operates within a specific response district encompassing the immediate geographical area around the station, all fire agencies within Sacramento County (i.e., SFD, Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District, Sac Airport Fire, Cosumnes Community Services District Fire Department, and the Folsom Fire Department) share an automatic aid agreement that allows response from the closest fire unit regardless of jurisdiction.

According to the Targeted MSR, the SFD seeks to respond to fire incidents and medical emergencies within four minutes.

As the proposed project primarily consists of industrial uses, with a limited number of commercial uses also proposed, the project would not be anticipated to generate a substantial amount of new population within the SFD service area, as the project does not include new residential units and the majority of jobs created by the project would be filled primarily by those already residing within the Sacramento region. As such, the proposed project would not be expected to substantially increase the need for additional SFD fire personnel, equipment, and facilities through population growth.

Nevertheless, due to the industrial nature of the project, the potential exists for workrelated injuries that necessitate emergency medical care to occur during project operation.

Based on assumptions in the Local Transportation Analysis, development of the project could generate a total of approximately 4,000 employees. Given the relatively close proximity of Station 43 to the project site, the SFD is anticipated to be capable of responding to emergency medical and fire incidents at the project site within the department’s four-minute response time goal. In addition, through the automatic aid agreement between fire agencies within Sacramento County, the most efficient fire protection and emergency medical services would be available to the project site. For example, Metro Air Park is scheduled to provide land and facilities for a new fire station near the project site. The 10,000-sf fire station site will be located approximately 1.4 miles north of the project site and operated by the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District, which would allow for immediate response to fire and emergency medical incidents at the project site.

All structures included as part of the proposed project would be constructed in accordance with the applicable standards set forth by the California Building Code (CBC) and California Fire Code (CFC). Consistent with the CBC, the design of the proposed buildings would include the installation and use of automatic fire sprinklers. Fire alarm systems would be incorporated pursuant to CFC requirements. Such features would reduce the potential for fires to occur and spread within the proposed structures, thereby reducing the demand for fire protection services associated with the proposed project.

General Plan Policy PFS 1.9 establishes the City’s commitment to ensuring the SFD has the necessary levels of facilities, apparatus, equipment, and staffing to provide adequate fire protection and emergency medical services within the department’s service area. The City funds the SFD budget, in part, through revenues generated from payment of application fees for applicable permits and clearances by new development. In addition, new development within the City is subject to applicable development impact fees to ensure a fair-share contribution is made to finance the purchase of new or expansion of existing SFD facilities, apparatus, and equipment necessary for the purposes of Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
maintaining adequate service levels. Accordingly, revenues generated through payment of applicable permit application fees by the proposed project, as well as development impact fees established pursuant to Sacramento City Code Section 18.24.050, would ensure the project pays a fair share for fire protection services provided by the SFD.

2. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
SFD services to the project site would be provided consistent with the development timeline of the proposed project, with fire protection staffing and facilities expanding incrementally.

3. Information with Respect to How the Services will be Financed The City funds the SFD budget, in part, through revenues generated from payment of application fees for applicable permits and clearances by new development. The proposed project would also be subject to development impact fees, as set forth by Sacramento City Code Section 18.24.050. Additional funding and financing information related to fire protection services that would be provided to the proposed project is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section.

XIII. SOLID WASTE
The project site is not currently provided solid waste collection services. Upon annexation into the City, the site would be provided services by the City of Sacramento’s Recycling and Solid Waste Division, which collects solid waste generated throughout the City, including household waste, recycling, construction and demolition materials, and organic wastes. According to the Targeted MSR, more than 660,000 tons of solid waste are generated annually, with the City collecting approximately 250,000 tons. The remainder is collected by franchised waste haulers and individual residents.

Waste collected by the City is initially transported to two locations, including the Sacramento Recycling and Transfer Station (SRTS), which accepts waste from the southern region of the City, and the Sacramento County North Area Recovery Station (NARS), which accepts waste from the north region of the City. Refuse is hauled from both locations to the Sacramento County Kiefer Landfill for processing. Solid waste generated by commercial uses (including multi-family residences of five units or more) is collected by private haulers and transported to the SRTS, NARS, Sacramento County Kiefer Landfill, as well as other facilities, including the Yolo County Central Landfill, L and D Landfill, the Florin Perkins Public Disposal Site, and the Elder Creek Transfer Station. According to the Targeted MSR, the Sacramento County Kiefer Landfill, located at Kiefer Boulevard and Grand Line Road, includes 1,084 acres of total area, with approximately 660 acres of landfill area. The Kiefer Landfill is the primary location for the City of Sacramento’s disposal of solid waste. The waste delivered to the landfill is from municipal and industrial sources, with an average of approximately 2,423 tons per day accepted.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to solid waste applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-5 Sensible waste management that reduces disposal in landfills and supports costeffective sustainability efforts.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Policy PFS-5.1 Solid Waste Reduction. The City shall reduce the amount of solid waste that is disposed in landfills by promoting source reduction and recycling throughout Sacramento and by
expanding the range of programs and information available to local residents and businesses, consistent with State
requirements.

Policy PFS-5.2 Collection and Recycling Services. The City shall provide for continued solid waste collection and recycling services in Sacramento, including contracting with franchise waste haulers, and ensuring adequate transfer station facilities capacity and the availability of adequate landfill capacity to meet future needs.

Policy PFS-5.5 Recycled Materials in New Construction. The City shall encourage the use of recycled materials in new construction.

Methods shall include promoting the availability of materials at Certified Construction and Demolition (C&D) Debris Sorting Facilities and the reuse store at the Sacramento Recycling and Transfer Station.

Policy PFS-5.6 Bulky Item and Appliance Disposal. The City shall continue to provide programs that allow residential households to schedule two appointments per year for the collection of large refuse items.

Policy PFS-5.8 Household Hazardous Waste Disposal. The City shall continue to promote the safe disposal of household hazardous waste, e-waste, and batteries through public education.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
Solid waste from the City is disposed of at the SRTS, NARS, Sacramento County Kiefer Landfill, as well as other facilities, including the Yolo County Central Landfill, L and D Landfill, the Florin Perkins Public Disposal Site, and the Elder Creek Transfer Station. The Kiefer Landfill is the primary location for the City of Sacramento’s disposal of solid waste.

The waste delivered to the landfill is from municipal and industrial sources, with an average of approximately 6,300 tons per day accepted. According to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the Kiefer Landfill is permitted to accept a maximum of 117,400,000 cubic yards of waste.9 The landfill has a remaining capacity of 112,900,000 cubic yards and is anticipated to cease operations by 2064.

Overall, following development of project site, the proposed project would result in a maximum building square footage of 6,707,500 sf. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) report, Estimating 2003 Building-Related Construction and Demolition Materials Amounts, non-residential construction activities generate an average 9 California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details Sacramento County Landfill (Kiefer) (34-AA-0001). Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2070?siteID=2507. Accessed August 2023.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
of 4.34 pounds per square foot (lbs/sf) of waste.10 Therefore, applying such an amount to buildout of the proposed project would produce approximately 29,110,550 lbs (14,555.3 tons) of construction waste (4.34 lbs/sf X 6,707,500 sf).

The construction waste estimate presented above represents a conservative analysis of the maximum potential waste production from construction of the proposed project. The California Green Building Standards Code, otherwise known as the CALGreen Code, requires at least 65 percent diversion of construction waste for projects permitted after January 1, 2017. As such, a minimum of 9,460.9 tons of waste would be diverted away from landfill disposal during construction. Considering the applicable CALGreen Code requirements, buildout of the proposed project would be anticipated to produce up to 5,094.4 tons of waste during construction. In addition, construction waste would be generated as part of installation of the proposed off-site force main. Construction waste generation represents a short-term increase in waste generation. Considering that the Kiefer Landfill has a remaining capacity of 96.1 percent of the total permitted capacity of the landfill, the proposed project’s construction waste would represent only an incremental contribution to the waste received at the landfill.

Operational solid waste generation from the proposed project has been estimated based on an average waste generation rate for employees of industrial uses, as published by CalRecycle.11 The total number of employees would produce approximately 35,720 lbs/day (17.86 tons/day) of operational solid waste. The Kiefer Landfill has a permitted throughput of 10,815 tons/day. Considering that the landfill currently accepts 6,300 tons/day, the landfill would be able to accommodate the operational waste generated by the proposed project. In addition, considering that the Kiefer Landfill has a remaining capacity of 96.1 percent, the proposed project’s operational waste would represent only an incremental contribution to the waste received at the landfill.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
The City has not indicated specific improvements or an upgrade of facilities associated with the development of the proposed project.

3. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
Solid waste service to the proposed project would be provided consistent with buildout of the project site with the proposed uses.

4. Information with Respect to How the Services will be Financed Solid waste services are funded through user fees. Waste collection services would be incrementally expanded throughout the course of buildout of the project site. Additional funding and financing information related to solid waste services that would be provided 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Estimating 2003 Building-Related Construction and Demolition Materials Amounts. 2009.
11 California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates. Accessed June 2023.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
to the proposed project is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section.

XIV. STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL
The Natomas Basin comprises approximately 50,000 acres spanning northwestern Sacramento County and southwestern Sutter County, and is protected by a levee system under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The levees surrounding the Natomas Basin were decertified by the USACE in December 2008. After that date, the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA), the USACE, and the State of California have been, and currently are, working together to fund, design and construct levee improvements to provide 200-year protection to the Natomas Basin. Over 50 percent of the levee improvements have been constructed, and 100 percent of the funding has been allocated by local, State, and federal agencies to complete all of the levee improvements.

The City of Sacramento is divided into approximately 120 drainage basins. Drainage from most of the basins flows to local rivers or creeks or drainage channels through pumping. The City owns and operates 105 storm drainage pumping stations throughout the City. The drainage canals and local creeks eventually drain into the Sacramento and American rivers. In the vicinity of the project site, Reclamation District (RD) 1000 owns and operates the existing canals and pumping plants that move storm drainage from the local area to the Sacramento River. RD 1000 collects all runoff within the Natomas Basin through a system of interconnected channels and directs this runoff to pumping plants in order to lift the water into the leveed rivers and channels surrounding Natomas.

The existing regional drainage facilities are shown in Figure 6. Off-site runoff within the project vicinity enters the project site along the RD 1000 L Drain of the Lone Tree Canal that flows south through three eight-foot by five-foot box culverts under I-5 (directly north of the project site). Within the project site, the RD 1000 L Drain of the Lone Tree Canal bisects the easterly third of the site from the remainder of the site. The RD 1000 L Drain flows south to join the West Drainage Canal that is located along the southern boundary of the project site.

At the confluence of the Lone Tree Canal and the West Drainage Canal, drainage runoff either flows east and south toward Pumping Plant 3 on the Sacramento River, or west and northwest toward Pumping Plant 5 on the Sacramento River. It should be noted that the RD 1000 system in the Lone Tree Canal and West Drainage Canal is operated with a permanent backwater condition whereby the canals contain water at all times of the year. Other than the existing RD 1000 ditches and canals discussed above, the project site does not contain internal drainage system facilities.

Peak flows within the West Drainage Canal downstream of the RD 1000 L Drain and West Drainage Canal confluence are currently 465.5 cubic feet per second (cfs). Water surface elevations within the connecting channel just upstream of Pumping Plant 3 are currently 13.789 feet and water surface elevations within the channel upstream of Pumping Plant 5 are currently

14.589 feet.

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the project area, the entirety of the project site is located within Zone A, which is designated as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) (see Figure 7). However, it should be noted that due to the levee improvements described above, portions of the Natomas Basin are now classified as A-99 flood zones, including the eastern portion of the project site.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 6
Regional Drainage Facilities
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 7
Project Area Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
A-99 is an interim designation that allows new development to proceed without elevation verification while the improvements needed to provide 100-year protection are under construction.

However, the A-99 flood zone is still a SFHA until construction of the levees is complete, and the levees are certified by FEMA.

In addition to the goals and policies listed above related to utilities in general, the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to storm drainage applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Public Facilities and Safety Element
Goal PFS-3 Efficient, high-quality utility infrastructure and services to meet the needs of residents and business throughout the city.

Policy PFS-3.15 Adequate Drainage Facilities. The City shall ensure that all new municipal drainage facilities are adequately sized and constructed to accommodate stormwater runoff, including incorporating “green infrastructure” design and Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, where appropriate, stormwater treatment features, and, if applicable, trash capture devices for its stormwater facilities.

Policy PFS-3.16 Stormwater Design in Private Development. The City shall require proponents of new development and redevelopment projects to submit drainage studies that adhere to City stormwater design requirements and incorporate measures, including “green infrastructure”, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, stormwater treatment, and, if applicable, trash capture devices, to prevent on- or off-site flooding and improve runoff water quality.

Policy PFS-3.17 Regional Stormwater Facilities. The City shall coordinate efforts with Sacramento County and other agencies in the development of regional stormwater facilities.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
Development of the proposed project would result in the conversion of a rural area to an industrial park, which would include the development of industrial uses, as well as retail/highway commercial uses within the project site. According to the Preliminary Drainage Study prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers (see Attachment E of this Plan for Services),
12 the proposed project would include an on-site storm drain system composed of post-construction stormwater quality measures such as Low Impact Development (LID) features, dedication of landscaping areas, and six on-site detention basins that would be designed consistent with the Sacramento Region Stormwater Quality Design Manual.

Impervious surfaces proposed as part of the project include building roofs, driveways, and roadways. Runoff from such surfaces would be captured by the on-site stormwater 12 Wood Rodgers. Airport South Industrial Preliminary Drainage Study. October 11, 2023.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
drainage system. The on-site drainage system would consist of a series of detention basins located adjacent to the RD 1000 ditches and canals that border the western and southern boundaries of the project site, and areas adjacent to the RD 1000 L Drain (which bisects the eastern portion of the project site) (see Figure 8). The basins would each be interconnected with 36-inch diameter culvert(s) or larger in order to provide a single continuous system. The basins would be connected to the RD 1000 system through weirs to meet the pre-project spill conditions and to provide on-site floodplain storage (see Figure 9).

The on-site stormwater drainage system would be controlled by a pump station currently planned to be located near the intersection of the RD 1000 L Drain and the proposed Airport South Industrial Drive. The pump station discharge capacity would be 35 cfs, modeled as two 17.5-cfs pumps.

A low-flow pump may also be incorporated to maintain the flood control depth needed in the basin for the winter months, or as needed to keep the basins drawn down in the summer months. Low flow pumps are typically not operated during flood control operations. The two basin areas on the east side of the RD 1000 L Drain would interconnect from south to north.

The north basin would then connect to the proposed drainage pump station through a pipe crossing under the RD 1000 L Drain, and a box structure and manhole/vault on each side of the RD 1000 L Drain, prior to a connection to the proposed pump station. Trash capture is anticipated to be achievable at the inlet to the pump station through screen mechanisms or mesh bags. The proposed on-site stormwater drainage system is a closed system that would only experience external influences during larger events like the 100-year event.

Therefore, 10-year system modeling and design is anticipated to be significantly lower than 100-year levels. The approximate volumes for pre-project and post-project detention during the 100-year storm event are presented in Table 5. As shown therein, the proposed LID features would be sufficiently sized to meet the required storage volumes. Thus, project runoff would be properly treated, and would not pollute downstream waterways.

In order to ensure continued operation of the proposed LID control features, a detailed site-specific inspection and maintenance procedures plan would be prepared by the project applicant, as required by Mitigation Measure 4.8-2 of the EIR. As part of the inspection and maintenance procedures plan, plants and vegetation within the detention basins would be inspected monthly and the basins would be inspected for the presence of standing water 72 hours after rain events. Required maintenance activity would include, but not necessarily be limited to, removal of debris from basins and removal of debris from outlets of basins. In addition, any method of trash capture would require frequent monitoring and cleaning to keep the pump station fully operational.

In addition, to assess the changes in runoff volumes from the project site that could occur due to the proposed project, Wood Rodgers calculated the pre- and post-construction water surface elevations (WSEs) at key locations within the project site’s drainage shed.

Pre- and post-construction WSEs are presented in Table 6. It should also be noted that peak flows within the West Drainage Canal downstream of the RD 1000 L Drain and West Drainage Canal confluence decrease slightly from pre-project to post-project conditions, from 465.5 cfs to 461.7 cfs.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 8
Proposed On-Site Drainage Conditions
Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Figure 9
Post-Project Drainage Conditions Within the Project Area Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
Table 5
Proposed Detention Basin Sizing
Property
Owner Acreage
Pre-Project
Acreage within
100-Year
Floodplain
Pre-Project
Maximum
Water Volume
Stored During
100-Year Event
(acre feet)
Post-Project
Maximum
Water Volume
Stored During
100-Year Event
(acre feet)
North Pointe AKT 353.5 308.8 174.6 362.3
Cayocca* 64.3 37.1 18.4 75.0
Campbell* 6.5 6.5 3.5 1.8
Isgur* 4.6 4.6 2.5 1.3
Patel* 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.2
Caltrans Remnant* 6.9 6.8 3.7 1.9
Total 436.5 364.1 203.0 442.5
Note: Some of the maximum water volumes reported in the table above were obtained by dividing model results by property owner boundaries, rather than watershed and/or development boundaries. An area weighting method was used to aggregate and divide post-project storage volume on a property owner basis for the Campbell, Isgur and Patel properties that share a single detention basin.
* At the time of the Preliminary Drainage Study was prepared, preliminary on-site grading has not been assessed. Detention volumes are preliminary.

Source: Wood Rodgers, 2023.

Water surface elevations within the connecting channel just upstream of Pumping Plant 3 also decrease from 13.789 feet to 13.764 feet, and water surface elevations within the channel upstream of Pumping Plant 5 decrease from 14.589 feet to 14.550 feet during post-project conditions. As shown in the table, the proposed project would result in reduced WSEs relative to existing conditions for the design-storm event (i.e., the 100-year storm event).

Based on the above, the proposed project would be consistent with applicable hydromodification requirements and would not increase the rate or amount of runoff leaving the project site during the design storm event. An exhaustive evaluation to determine the exact peak pumping rate that would create an increase in the RD 1000 system was not conducted as part of the Preliminary Drainage Report; however, pumping may be determined to exceed 35 cfs during final design, making the on-site detention system operate even more effectively. Increased pumping could potentially allow for a smaller detention volume after final design features, such as inlet/outlet access ramps and encroachments, are fully accounted for during the improvement plan process.

While the worst case 100-year flooding in the RD 1000 system occurs during a 10-day duration storm event, different parts of the system may behave differently under shorter duration rainfall conditions. As such, Wood Rogers also evaluated the drainage system during 100-year, 24-hour rainfall conditions to verify whether the higher intensity rainfall patterns occurring in a 24-hour duration storm would produce a higher on-site peak condition in the detention basin system. Based on the Wood Rogers analysis, while the RD 1000 system would still produce elevated channel levels high enough to spill into the project site during the 100-year 24-hour event, the resulting peak stage in the proposed on-site detention basin would be 11.2 feet, which is more than 2.6 feet lower than the peak Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
stage during the 10-day storm event. Finally, the outflow that would occur during postproject conditions closely mirrors the existing conditions of the project site. Thus, the proposed drainage system would not result in extensive period of standing water in the basins.

Table 6
Pre- and Post-Project Peak Flow Elevations
Location
Model
Node
Name
COSD NAVD 88
PreProject
Model
WSE
(feet)
PostProject
Model
WSE
(feet)
PreProject
Model
WSE
(feet)
PostProject
Model
WSE
(feet)
Western Development
Storage Node 1132 12.201 11.86 14.182 13.841
Northern Portion of Eastern
Development Storage Node
Proposed
Development - 11.903 - 13.884
Patel, Isgur, Campbell, and
Caltrans Remnant Node 317 - 11.861 - 13.842
Cayocca Storage Node 11215 12.209 12.052 14.19 14.033
RD 1000 L Drain –
Downstream of I-5
11536 12.579 12.353 14.56 14.334
RD 1000 L Drain – New
Node to Connect New
Pump to the RD 1000 L
Drain
Node 316 - 12.071 - 14.052
RD 1000 L Drain – New
Node to Connect Eastern
Development to the RD
1000 L Drain
Node 314 - 12.066 - 14.047
RD 1000 L Drain and West
Drainage Canal Confluence 167 12.198 11.986 14.179 13.967 West Drainage Canal and
Reach 6 Confluence 1103 12.219 12.018 14.2 14.002
West Drainage Canal –
Node to Connect Western
Development and West
Drainage Canal
166 12.198 11.972 14.179 13.953
West Drainage Canal -
Upstream of Del Paso Road 11013 12.071 11.878 14.052 13.862 Source: Wood Rodgers, 2023.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
Specific improvements necessary to storm drainage service have been detailed in the Preliminary Drainage Study prepared for the proposed project by Wood Rodgers.

3. An Indication of When the Services Can Feasibly be Extended to the Affected Territory
Storm drainage service to the proposed project would be provided consistent with buildout of the project site with the proposed uses.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

4. Information with Respect to How the Services will be Financed The developer will construct the proposed drainage facilities. In addition, the proposed project would be subject to the RD 1000 development impact fee and stormwater fee to ensure the project contributes a fair share toward improvements to the RD 1000 storm drain system. Additional funding and financing information related to storm drainage services that would be provided to the proposed project is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section.

XV. PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Sacramento maintains a network of parks, open spaces, and recreation areas that contribute to the identity and character of the City’s neighborhoods and urban areas. Park and tree maintenance is managed by the City’s Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment Department, which also directs future park design and planning, administrative services, marketing, recreation and human services, and special events.

Approximately 4,360 acres of parks, parkways, open space, community centers, aquatic facilities, and bike trails are accessible to Sacramento residents at more than 234 sites, which includes 218 parks, recreation, parkway, and open space sites; 21 lakes, ponds, and beaches; 17 aquatic facilities; 13 community centers; and approximately 115 miles of shared-use paths, including extensive river parkways along the Sacramento and American rivers. Parks in Sacramento range in size between 0.1-acre and 625 acres and are interwoven with urban areas and neighborhoods.

Citywide parks are equipped with a variety of amenities, including 127 soccer fields, 138 group picnic areas, seventeen pools, and 213 play structures. Park types within the City of Sacramento include the following:
• Neighborhood Parks: The City’s neighborhood parks range in size between two and 10 acres and each serve a 0.5-mile radius. Some facilities are located adjacent to elementary schools where park programming can be oriented to the recreational needs of children.

Other neighborhood-serving park types include urban plazas and pocket parks, which are strictly less than five acres in size and typically placed in the urban core. • Community Parks: Community parks are generally six to 60 acres in size and provide a broader range of amenities for several neighborhoods within a three-mile radius. In addition to the types of amenities provided at neighborhood parks, community parks are sized to provide additional amenities such as restrooms, on-site parking, community centers, swimming pools, lighted sports fields or courts, and/or other specialized facilities. • Citywide/Regional Parks: Citywide/regional parks are generally 75 to 200 acres in size and are intended to serve the City. Citywide/regional parks typically incorporate amenities that are not found in smaller neighborhood or community parks and may include facilities such as golf courses, aquatic centers, marinas, amusement areas, nature areas, and/or shared-use trails. Parkways are also included in the classification and typically consist of linear, narrow corridors with limited recreational uses that are primarily used for pedestrian/bicycle linkages between residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, and shopping areas.
• Open Space and Shared-Use Paths: The City’s open space and shared-use paths are for natural areas within the City that are used to protect environmental amenities, such as native plant communities or wildlife habitat. Open space areas generally have limited recreational use. While classified separately, parkways are similar to the open space classification, due to their limited recreational use and design.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
The nearest park to the project site is Egret Park, which is located immediately to the east of the site within the Westlake Subdivision community. In accordance with Sacramento City Code Section 18.56.230, new development within the City is required to pay a Park Development Impact Fee prior to issuance of a building permit. Revenues generated through the Park Development Impact Fee pay for any new park facilities deemed necessary by the City, including the design, construction, installation, improvement, and acquisition of park facilities for neighborhood parks within two miles of a project site, community parks within five miles of a site, and regional and citywide park facilities located anywhere in the City.

In addition, the City of Sacramento Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2005-2010, which establishes policies to guide decision-making by City staff and officials related to park facilities, identifies growth opportunity areas, the closest of which to the project site is the City-approved Northlake (Greenbriar) subdivision, to the north of the site, across I-5. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan does not identify parks and recreation growth opportunity areas within the project site, as the site is currently within the unincorporated portion of Sacramento County. The nearest park facility within the unincorporated County to the project site is the Teal Bend Golf Club, located

2.4 miles to the northwest of the project site.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to park and recreation facilities applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Youth, Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Element
Goal YPRO-1 An integrated system of parks, open space areas, shared-use paths, and recreational facilities that are welcoming, well-maintained, safe, and accessible to all the diverse communities of Sacramento.

Policy YPRO-1.1 Range of Experiences. The City shall provide a range of parks and recreational facilities and strive to ensure an equitable distribution of high-quality facilities throughout Sacramento.

Policy YPRO-1.3 Parkland Service Standard. The City shall evaluate, as needed, the equitable increase of public park acreage to serve the needs of the current and future residents with high-quality facilities. The City shall continue to strive to achieve a parkland service standard of 8.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, which includes neighborhood parks, community parks, regional parks, open space, and parkways.

Policy YPRO-1.4 Parkland Dedication Requirements. The City shall continue to require that new residential development projects contribute toward the provision of adequate parks and recreational facilities to serve the new residents, either through the dedication of parkland, the construction of public and/or private recreation facilities, or the payment of parkland in-lieu fees, consistent with the Quimby Ordinance. To achieve the level of service for all parkland in all areas of the city, the City shall seek other funding resources to prioritize park needs in park deficit areas.

Policy YPRO-1.7 Co-Located Joint-Use Facilities. The City shall continue to facilitate the development of new parks or expansion of existing Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
parks and recreational facilities by co-locating with and joint use of new or existing public and institutional facilities (e.g., schools, libraries, cultural facilities, and stormwater detention basins) in order to efficiently provide for community needs and offset operations and maintenance costs, prioritizing disadvantaged communities with an existing deficit of park or recreation facilities.

Policy YPRO-1.9 Timing of Services. The City shall monitor the pace and location of new development through the development review process and long-range planning efforts to strive to ensure that development of parks, recreation programming, and
community-serving facilities and services keeps pace with growth.

Policy YPRO1.27 Fee Benchmarking. The City shall periodically review Quimby inlieu parkland dedication fees, park development impact fees, application review fees, and user fees and charges to ensure they are adequately providing for community needs and are competitive within the region.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The proposed project primarily consists of industrial uses, with a limited number of commercial uses also proposed. Thus, the project would not be anticipated to generate a substantial amount of new population within the City of Sacramento, as the project does not include new residential units and the majority of jobs created by the project would be filled primarily by those already residing within the region. Therefore, the proposed project would not be expected to substantially increase demand for park services provided by the Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment Department. Similarly, the proposed project would not be anticipated to result in a substantial increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of an existing recreational facility would occur or be accelerated.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
The proposed project consists of industrial and commercial development that is not anticipated to affect capacity or demand for park and recreation facilities in the City of Sacramento. Improvements to park and recreation facilities in the City would not be necessary as a result of the proposed project.

3. Information with Respect to How the Services will be Financed In accordance with Sacramento City Code Section 18.56.230, the proposed project would be subject to payment of the City’s Park Development Impact Fee prior to issuance of a building permit. Revenues generated through the project’s payment of the Park Development Impact Fee would ensure the project contributes a fair share to the construction or expansion of any new park facilities deemed necessary by the City, which would be required to be constructed in accordance with applicable policies, regulations, and standards. Additional funding and financing information related to park and recreation Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024
services that would be provided to the proposed project is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section.

XVI. LIBRARIES
The Sacramento Public Library (SPL) serves the cities of Sacramento, Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Galt, Iselton, Rancho Cordova, and the County of Sacramento. The SPL authority is governed by a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the cities and County to provide public library services to all citizens in the combined jurisdiction. Currently, SPL operates a total of 27 branches, including 11 branches within the City of Sacramento and 16 branches in other cities and throughout Sacramento County.13 SPL also operates a bookmobile. Residents of Sacramento County have access to all library branches both inside and outside the City of Sacramento. In addition, 16 new libraries are planned for construction in the City and County of Sacramento by 2025. Based on plans set forth in the SPL Authority Facility Master Plan, the SPL expects to provide 1,007,274 sf of library space throughout the SPL’s service area by 2025. The North Natomas Public Library is the closest SPL branch to the project site and is located approximately

2.5 miles to the east of the site at 4660 Via Ingoglia Street.

The City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan contains guiding goals and policies related to libraries applicable to the proposed project, which are presented below.

Youth, Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Element
Goal YPRO-2 Public facilities located, designed, and programmed to make a vital contribution to neighborhood quality of life.

Policy YPRO-2.4 Library Services. The City shall work with the Sacramento Public Library Authority to ensure adequate library services and facilities are maintained for all residents and promote the siting of facilities in accessible locations with the greatest potential for positive neighborhood impact.

1. Description, Level, and Range of Services to be Extended to the Project Site
The proposed project primarily consists of industrial uses, with a limited number of commercial uses also proposed. Thus, the project would not be anticipated to generate a substantial amount of new population within the City of Sacramento, as the project does not include new residential units and the majority of jobs created by the project would be filled primarily by those already residing within the region. Therefore, the proposed project would not be expected to substantially increase demand for library services provided by the SPL.

2. An Indication of Any Improvement or Upgrade of Facilities and Other Conditions the City Would Impose or Require Within the Affected Territory if the Reorganization is Completed
The proposed project consists of industrial and commercial development that is not anticipated to affect capacity or demand for library facilities in the City of Sacramento.

Improvements to library facilities in the City would not be necessary as a result of the proposed project.
13 Sacramento Public Library. Locations. Available at: https://www.saclibrary.org/Locations. Accessed February 2024.

Airport South Industrial Project
Plan for Services

April 2024

3. Information with Respect to How the Services will be Financed A total of 16 new libraries are planned for construction in the City and County of Sacramento by 2025. Based on plans set forth in the SPL Authority Facility Master Plan, the SPL already expects to provide 1,007,274 sf of library space throughout the SPL’s service area by 2025. Thus, any new residents within the Sacramento region indirectly induced by the proposed project’s permanent employment positions would reasonably be assumed to not result in the need for new or physically altered SPL facilities to meet performance objectives. Additional funding and financing information related to library services that would be provided to the proposed project is detailed in the Targeted MSR in the “Financial Ability to Provide Services” section.

Airport South Industrial Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Errata Sheet
May 2025
Introduction
In the time since the environmental analysis for the Airport South Industrial Project was published, the legal protection status of the burrowing owl was revised, and minor administrative clarifications in the text of the environmental analysis were identified. This Errata presents the revisions to the Airport South Industrial Project Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Revisions to the Final EIR text are presented in strike-through and double-underline format, and new revisions to the Draft EIR text are highlighted. The revisions to the Final EIR reflected in this Errata are meant to address minor administrative clarifications in the Final EIR text and the current status of the burrowing owl, and do not affect the adequacy of the previous environmental analysis contained in the Airport South Industrial Project Final EIR. Because the changes presented below would not result in any new significant impacts or increase in impact significance from what was identified in the Final EIR, recirculation of the Airport South Industrial Project Final EIR is not required.

The burrowing owl was designated as a candidate species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) on October 24, 2024, subsequent to when the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Draft EIR for the Airport South Industrial Project were published. While the protected status of any species could change over time, even following the certification of an EIR, compliance with the requirements established by CESA would ensure adequate protection of such species at the time that development would occur. Furthermore, because burrowing owl is currently only a candidate species under CESA, it is unknown if, at the time of initiation of construction activities, the species will be officially protected under CESA or not. With respect to burrowing owl in the context of the Airport South Industrial Project, implementation of Mitigation Measure

4.4-6 would require a preconstruction survey for the presence of the species, and appropriate actions should burrowing owl be found, pursuant to Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Take Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures. Furthermore, Mitigation Measure 4.4-5(b), as amended on page 2-27 of the Final EIR, addresses potential impacts to Swainson’s hawk by requiring, in part, that, prior to the issuance of any grading permit and commencement of project-related ground-disturbing activities outside of the Natomas Basin HCP permit area, the project applicant would consult with CDFW for a Section 2081 Incidental Take Permit, demonstrate to the City that none was required by CDFW, or pay fees (and dedicate land as applicable) under the Natomas Basin HCP if a portion of the City’s surplus HCP coverage is made available to the proposed project. Such mitigation would not only apply to the protection of Swainson’s hawk, but would apply to any species encountered on-site that is protected under CESA. As such, the existing mitigation included in the Final EIR adequately addresses potential impacts to special-status species that could occur on-site, including burrowing owl. Nonetheless, the Final EIR has been updated to reflect the status of the burrowing owl, and specifically reference Mitigation Measure 4.4-5(b) as it relates to burrowing owl.

Along with the changed status of the burrowing owl, another change relevant to the Airport South Industrial Project that has occurred since the Draft EIR was published is the completed drafting of the Development Agreement for the project. As defined in Section 18.16.020 of the City’s Municipal Code, the Development Agreement allows the City and the applicant to enter into an agreement to assure the City that the proposed project would be completed in compliance with the plans submitted by the applicant and assure the applicant of vested rights to develop the project. The Development Agreement was listed as an entitlement of the Airport South Industrial Project and was generally analyzed as part of the Draft EIR with the anticipation that the Development Agreement would not include any improvements that could result in physical impacts to the environment beyond what was included in the Draft EIR. Now that the Development Agreement has been finalized and is available for review, the conclusion that additional physical impacts to the environment would not occur beyond what was analyzed in the Draft EIR has been confirmed. As such, approval of the Development Agreement would not warrant further CEQA review beyond what is already included in the Draft EIR.

For clarification and disclosure purposes, the Final EIR has been updated to reflect the status of the burrowing owl, as well as to address other administrative clarifications.

Changes to the Final EIR text

Mitigation Measure 4.4-4(b) is hereby revised as follows:

Industrial Park and Nonparticipating Parcels

4.4-4(a) Prior to the issuance of any grading permit and commencement of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant shall ensure that the following Natomas Basin HCP Take Avoidance,
Minimization, and Mitigation Measure has been implemented:

Natomas Basin HCP Section V.A.5.j:

1. Take of the northwestern pond turtle as a result of
habitat destruction during construction activities,
including the removal of irrigation ditches and drains, and during ditch and drain maintenance, will be
minimized by the dewatering requirement described
above for giant garter snake (see Section 5.a.(3)).

4.4-4(b) Implement Mitigation Measures 4.4-1(a), 4.4-3(a), and 4.4-3(b).

Mitigation Measure 4.4-4(b), on page 4.4-50 of Chapter 4.4, Biological Resources, of the Draft EIR is hereby revised as follows:

Industrial Park and Nonparticipating Parcels

4.4-4(a) Prior to the issuance of any grading permit and commencement of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant shall ensure that the following Natomas Basin HCP Take Avoidance,
Minimization, and Mitigation Measure has been implemented:

Natomas Basin HCP Section V.A.5.j:

2. Take of the northwestern pond turtle as a result of
habitat destruction during construction activities,
including the removal of irrigation ditches and drains, and during ditch and drain maintenance, will be
minimized by the dewatering requirement described
above for giant garter snake (see Section 5.a.(3)).

4.4-4(b) Implement Mitigation Measures 4.4-1(a), 4.4-3(a), and 4.4-3(b). […]
Mitigation Measure 4.4-6, beginning on page 4.4-54 of Chapter 4.4, Biological Resources, of the Draft EIR is hereby revised as follows:

Industrial Park and Nonparticipating Parcels

4.4-6 Prior to the issuance of any grading permit and commencement of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant shall comply with applicable portions of Measure 4.4-5(b) regarding consultation with CDFW, demonstration that no incidental take permit was required, or payment of fees (with or without land dedication as applicable) under the Natomas Basin HCP and shall ensure that the following Natomas Basin HCP Take
Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measure has been implemented:

Natomas Basin HCP Section V.A.5.h:

1. Prior to the initiation of grading or earth disturbing activities, the applicant/developer shall hire a CDFG
approved qualified biologist to perform a preconstruction survey of the site to determine if any burrowing owls are using the site for foraging or
nesting. The pre-construction survey shall be submitted to the City prior to the developer’s commencement of
construction activities and a mitigation program shall be developed and agreed to by the City and developer prior to initiation of any physical disturbance on the site.

2. Occupied burrows shall not be disturbed during nesting season (February 1 through August 31) unless a
qualified biologist approved by the CDFG verifies
through non-invasive measures that either: 1) the birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or 2) that
juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging
independently and are capable of independent survival.

3. If nest sites are found, the USFWS and CDFG shall be contacted regarding suitable mitigation measures, which may include a 300 foot buffer from the nest site during the breeding season (February 1 - August 31), or a
relocation effort for the burrowing owls if the birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation or the juveniles
from the occupied burrows are foraging independently
and are capable of independent survival. If on-site
avoidance is required, the location of the buffer zone
will be determined by a qualified biologist. The
developer shall mark the limit of the buffer zone with
yellow caution tape, stakes, or temporary fencing. The
buffer will be maintained throughout the construction
period.

4. If relocation of the owls is approved for the site by USFWS and CDFG, the developer shall hire a qualified
biologist to prepare a plan for relocating the owls to a suitable site. The relocation plan must include: (a) the location of the nest and owls proposed for relocation;
(b) the location of the proposed relocation site; (c) the number of owls involved and the time of year when the
relocation is proposed to take place; (d) the name and
credentials of the biologist who will be retained to
supervise the relocation; (e) the proposed method of
capture and transport for the owls to the new site; (f) a description of the site preparations at the relocation site (e.g., enhancement of existing burrows, creation of
artificial burrows, one-time or long-term vegetation
control, etc.); and (g) a description of efforts and
funding support proposed to monitor the relocation.

Relocation options may include passive relocation to
another area of the site not subject to disturbance
through one way doors on burrow openings, or
construction of artificial burrows in accordance with the CDFG’s October 17, 1995, Staff Report on Burrowing
Owls Mitigation (see Appendix D).

5. Where on-site avoidance is not possible, disturbance and/or destruction of burrows shall be offset through
development of suitable habitat on TNBC upland
reserves or in other suitable preserved uplands. Such
habitat shall include creation of new burrows with
adequate foraging area (a minimum of 6.5 acres) or 300
feet radii around the newly created burrows. Additional habitat design and mitigation measures are described in CDFW’s March 7, 2012, Staff Report on Burrowing Owl
Mitigation.

The above modification is for clarification purposes only and does not change the analysis or conclusions of the Final EIR.

Airport South Industrial Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Errata
(October 13, 2025)
Introduction
Since the City of Sacramento published the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Airport South Industrial Project (ASI Project), the City identified minor revisions and clarifications to the text of the ASI Project Final EIR. This Errata presents the minor clarifications and text revisions to the Airport South Industrial Project Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Revisions to the Draft EIR text that were included in the Final EIR are presented in doubleunderline format, and new revisions to the Draft EIR text that are the subject of this errata are presented in double-underline format and are highlighted. The revisions to the Final EIR reflected in this Errata are meant to address minor administrative edits and clarifications in the Final EIR text and do not affect the adequacy of the previous environmental analysis contained in the Airport South Industrial Project EIR. Because the changes presented below would not result in any new significant impacts or increase in impact significance from the impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR, recirculation of the Airport South Industrial Project EIR is not required.

Description of Clarifications to Final EIR Text
The following changes are added to the text revisions described in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR.

Chapter 3 Project Description

The following section is added before the Development Agreement, consistent with the discussion of the Airport South Industrial Project’s preserve sites set forth on page 2-24 and 3-2 of the Final EIR:

Off-Site Preserves
The ASI project applicant has voluntarily agreed to dedicate 117.59 acres of off-site lands to The Natomas Basin Conservancy (TNBC) for the purpose of preserving and managing open space/agricultural lands in accordance with the NBHCP. b. Off-site Agricultural/Open Space Requirements: The following Off Site Open Space properties:
• 141.51 acres of currently unidentified agricultural/open spaced mitigation property to be located in the unincorporated Sacramento County and/or unincorporated Sutter County.
• 50-acre habitat mitigation property APN 225-0020-014. • 67.59-acre habitat mitigation property APN 225-0020-015.

The two off-site habitat reserve sites consist of the 117.59 acre Rosa properties (APNs 225-020-015 and 225-020-014). The off-site dedication will complete a 400-acre reserve for The Natomas Basin Conservancy (TNBC). The dedication of the Rosa properties will increase the size of the TNBC adjacent existing reserve.

Chapter 4.2 Agricultural Resources
Mitigation Measure 4.2-1, beginning on page 3-2 of the Final EIR, is hereby revised as follows:

Industrial Park

4.2-1 The City shall ensure that, prior to impacting agricultural/open space resources within the project site by the issuance of a grading permit, any and all project-related subdivision maps satisfy the On-Site Open Space and Off-Site Open Space requirements as defined herein. Open space dedications made pursuant to the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) shall be made to the City and/or the Natomas Basin Conservancy and shall be located in the Natomas Basin. The remaining non-Natomas Basin HCP mitigation acreage may be located in unincorporated Sacramento County, Yolo County, and/or Sutter County, and may be held and managed by a qualified third-party entity with the approval of the City. Preservation shall be ensured in perpetuity via conservation easement, fee, or irrevocable offer of dedication to the satisfaction of the City. All mitigation acreage shall consist of land of comparable agricultural and habitat value as the agricultural/open space resources impacted by the proposed project, as determined by the City.
a. On-Site Agricultural/Open Space Requirements: The following onsite open space properties are consistent with the mitigation requirements:
• 86 acres of detention basins.
• 37.9 acres of freeway buffer.
• 2.3 acres of canal buffers.
b. Off-site Agricultural/Open Space Requirements: The following OffSite Open Space properties shall be dedicated to The Natomas Basin Conservancy (TNBC):
• 141.51 acres of currently unidentified agricultural/open spaced mitigation property to be located in the
unincorporated Sacramento County and/or unincorporated
Sutter County.
• 50-acre habitat mitigation property APN 225-0020-014. • 67.59-acre habitat mitigation property APN 225-0020-015. c. Phasing: The Airport South Industrial Project will develop in phases, as such, the amount of On-Site and Off-Site Open Space to be provided hereunder shall be in proportion to the amount of acreage proposed to be impacted by such development by the issuance of a grading permit therefor.
d. With respect to each unidentified open space property listed above, and any proposed substitution of an open space property listed above, the City must determine, in writing, that the proposed agricultural/open space property and/or acreage satisfies the requirements for agricultural/open space to be counted towards the requisite Off-Site Agricultural/Open Space acreage total. e. Nothing in this Agricultural/Open Space Mitigation is intended to limit or restrict USFWS and CDFW in their consideration of Developer's applications for incidental take and/or other habitat mitigation permits or other entitlements under the federal Endangered Species Act and the California Endangered Species Act.

The above modifications are for clarification purposes only and do not change the analysis or conclusions of the EIR.
1 of 5
November 12, 2025
1) LACK OF LOCATION ALTERNATIVES IN ASIP EIR
The EIR did not consider alternative locations for the proposed industrial warehouse buildings and thus did not consider alternatives with fewer environmental impacts. For example, existing opportunities at Aerojet, McClellan, or Mather, or the planned light industrial in Sutter County, which is very near the airport and permitted for development in the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (NBHCP), were not considered.

We believe the City should undertake a study to assess the demand for warehouse space near the airport and elsewhere, as well as the supply of unused existing warehouse space and suitably located vacant parcels. While the demand for warehouses is now undetermined, ASIP’s health impacts to school kids and residents are determined, and they are significant. They could be avoided by not approving the proposed ASIP location.
2) METRO AIR PARK – REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL AIRPORT-SERVING RESOURCE To what extent is Metro Air Park (MAP) hosting industrial uses that support the airport and how much business (non-industrial) could be located elsewhere?
Since 1965, the area called Metro Air Park was designated for industrial development to serve airport-related uses, as a resource to the region.

In the 1973 General Plan, the land use designation became Industrial Extensive and M-1 Light Industrial zoning instead of Agriculture. In 1983, the zoning changed to a Special Planning Area. 1 The 1,920-acre MAP took shape in 1993:

Through another Special Planning Area Ordinance, No. 93-0045, MAP was planned to include light manufacturing, airport manufacturing and distribution, industrial/office park, high tech, and R&D.

Questionably, it also included general commercial (hotel and retail) and a golf course, to handle onsite storm drainage. 1 SPA via Ordinance No. 83-SPA-3
2 of 5
The MAP plan below, from Greater Sacramento Economic Council, includes my outline of the 913 acres of industrial uses in RED. This shows that exactly half of the 1,829 acres are planned for nonindustrial uses.2 The other uses are offices (commercial and R&D) and open space.

Further, as portrayed in the image below from the Metro Air Park Landscape & Design Guidelines, a very light level of development is planned. This might be alright if we didn’t know that nearby parcels are being proposed for industrial development on the basis that there is not enough room in MAP.
2 Metro Air Park in Sacramento Takes Flight
3 of 5
These nearby parcels are just to the south and east of MAP, on the north and south sides of I-5 as shown on the map below. Airport South Industrial is 475 acres, and the parcel to the east of MAP is 509 acres. Both of these parcels are on land outside the County’s Urban Services Boundary (blue dotted line) and on land not permitted for development under the NBHCP.

MAP could and should be developed more intensely for industrial uses, to fulfill the original 1965 concept of a regional airport-adjacent industrial resource. Public money is being invested in MAP via the EIFD (Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District), using tax revenue for public facilities (roads, freeways, utilities) to attract regional-serving businesses. 3 We should make the most of our
investment in MAP.

Before the City approves the removal of open land for ASIP, land that has been protected for over 30 years for sustainability reasons, the City should take a hard look at MAP, and make sure it is being used for its highest and best use.

The City should also consider the demand for industrial space which we believe can be met by current General Plan zoning. As stated above, the ASIP EIR should have included alternative sites.

The maps below show the parcels owned by Northpointe Development in Natomas and at Aerojet. 3 Metro Air Park Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (the “MAP EIFD”) 4 of 5
3) PARCELS OWNED BY NORTHPOINT IN SACRAMENTO …
From SF Chronicle.com Newest map reveals who owns every property in California For any property in California By Emma Stiefel | Updated Oct. 23, 2025

5 of 5
4) VAST OVERSUPPLY OF INDUSTRIALLY ZONED LAND IN SAC COUNTY There is a “vast oversupply of industrially zoned land within the county” according to the 2022 SacCounty’s General Plan Land Use Element:
“Estimate of Excess Industrial Supply.

The amount of excess industrially zoned land in the unincorporated county is considerable.

In the office industrial (MP) category, the existing 3,863-acre supply easily accommodates the projected demand for 110 acres between 1989 and 2010. This results in more than 3,700 acres of excess land designated for office industrial uses. In the heavy and light industrial category, the existing 6,585 acres of designated land easily accommodates the estimated demand for 2,800 acres between 1989 and 2010. This amounts to a 3,785-acre oversupply.

The 3,545 acres of Industrial Reserve land adds to the total acreage of vacant, industrially zoned land. Note also that areas designated for Industrial Extensive uses, but are zoned for agricultural, are not included in the inventory.

The vast oversupply of industrially zoned land within the county is in part a result of the need to create buffers around incompatible uses (e.g. McClellan AFB, Aerojet General) or the need to protect certain resources (e.g. aggregate mining). The oversupply is also a result of the need to provide a wide variety of industrial areas to attract desirable industries, especially in light of the intense competition from other jurisdictions for those industries.

Industrial lands should be efficiently used by advocating the reuse of industrial areas for medium and higher densities when supported by adequate public infrastructure and served by light rail or express bus service.”4
5) WHAT USES ARE REALLY BEING PROPOSED FOR ASIP?
The City should have a commitment regarding the specific uses being proposed for ASIP before approving it.
6) THINK REGIONALLY
An analysis should be done of the uses in MAP, ASIP and Northpoint’s other parcels around MAP and at AEROJET, to be sure that, considering the damage to the NBHCP and existing agreements between the City and wildlife agencies, we are, as a region, planning wisely. 4 https://planning.saccounty.gov/Documents/B12.%20Land%20Use%20Element%20Amended%2012-13-22.pdf www.ecosacramento.net
Post Office Box 1526 | Sacramento, CA 95812-1526
City of Sacramento Mayor and City Council
October 21, 2025
Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Agenda, Tuesday, October 21, 2025, Consent Calendar Item # 28 [Pass for Publication] Airport South Industrial Annexation (P21-017), File ID: 2025-01124 Dear Mayor and City Council members –
The Environmental Council of Sacramento (ECOS) asks you to oppose the Airport South Industrial Project. As you review the 10/21/2025 document “[Pass for Publication] Airport South Industrial Annexation (P21-017)” – please consider the issues below:

Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan
How are you going to assure the public and the wildlife agencies that what you propose does not compromise the ability of the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (NBHCP, or HCP) to be implemented as approved? The City is a signatory to the Plan.

How will the approval of this project impact the ability of the Natomas Basin Conservancy (NBC) to implement its HCP? Please provide more specific information about the number of acres of mitigating habitat required and planned for this Project, and their location with respects to the HCP boundary and the incorporated vs unincorporated areas of Sacramento County.

How will the City comply with the NBCHP’s requirements for projects outside of the current permit area? Has the City consulted with California Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding their concerns about this project beyond the formal CEQA communication process? Will you discuss this project’s mitigation with the agency that is responsible for the City’s legal commitment to implement the Natomas Basin HCP, prior to voting on the project?
AB 98
This issue was brought up by Commissioner Larry Lee of the Planning and Design Commission during their meeting of June 26, 2025. AB 98 goes into effect January 1, 2026. Much of AB 98 applies to a project like ASIP. It would make sense to wait to vote on the Project until after the new bill goes into effect.

Location
The EIR did not consider alternative locations for Airport South. For example, why wasn’t Mather considered as an alternative location, where infrastructure is already in place and away from sensitive receptors? How much of the build out at the Metro Air Park is directly related to supporting the airport? What are future plans for development at MAP and do they include business that could be located elsewhere, such as a hotel or www.ecosacramento.net
golf course? Is Airport South Industrial needed for warehouses if MAP is investing in non-airport freight related uses?
Parcel 8
Based on emissions of fine particles from diesel trucks, the EIR calculates a risk of over 9-and-a-half excess cancer cases per million - just under the threshold for mitigation of 10 in a million. However, this assumes no development in Parcel 8, which is closest to residences and Paso Verde elementary school. The EIR states that if Parcel 8 is developed with over a hundred trucks per day, the health risk assessment for cancer would then be analyzed.

If Parcel 8 is developed, it would likely push the level of pollutants into the need for mitigation. Who will be responsible for the mitigation? Only the Parcel 8 owner, Northpoint, or the City? Planning and Design Commission Recommendations
During their consideration of this project on June 26, 2025, the Planning and Design Commission discussed the necessity for this Project to establish more robust plans to protect the community and natural resources than outlined in the EIR. The Commission was particularly concerned about requirements related to setbacks, loading dock placement, and noise. How will these concerns be addressed? Will new conditions regarding setbacks, air quality, and noise be formally published in the EIR and recirculated for public review? What will be the guiding principles for the new conditions?
Conflicts with existing Planning Policies
The proposed Project location falls outside of the County Urban Services Boundary (USB) and Urban Policy Area (UPA). Although these are County plans, what are the implications of the City urbanizing beyond these foundational policies? Would the approval of this project not have precedent-setting impacts to disregard policies like the USB and UPA in favor of future development in the Natomas Basin? As you vote on this project you must consider the unanswered questions and outstanding issues that remain.

We look forward to your answers before a City Council vote.

Sincerely,
Alexandra Reagan
Director of Operations, ECOS

From: clerk
To: Agenda
Subject: Fw: Airport South Industrial project
Date: Monday, September 29, 2025 7:37:45 AM
From: Toni Morris <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2025 7:17 PM
To: clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Airport South Industrial project
To the City of Sacramento ClerkI am writing to oppose the proposed Airport South industrial project. This project is bad for our
Natomas neighborhoods and residents. It
would bring many more trucks, creating
safety hazards to our already over-loaded
roads. Not yo mention the added noise at all
hours!
The voices of the people effected by this
proposal should be considered and the
project stopped.

D. Toni Morris
Natomas Resident
From: clerk
To: Agenda
Subject: Fw: Support for the South Airport Industrial Project Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 12:43:46 PM
Please see below from clerk@ inbox.

Kamie
From: Don Hubbard <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 11:08 AM
To: clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Support for the South Airport Industrial Project I am a resident of North Natomas and wish to express my support for the South Airport Industrial Project.

I am both a licensed traffic engineer and a certified city planner, and have had a long career assisting local governments in California to make good land use and transportation decisions. I attended an ECOS meeting on this particular project with an open mind. The arguments they presented against the project were nonsense from a technical standpoint, though they sounded plausible enough to people with a NIMBY mindset who are predisposed to oppose development of any kind. The truth is that this is an excellent site for the type of development being proposed, for the following reasons:

1. It is near three major freeways (I-5, I-80, and SR-99) and vehicles can access them without ever going through residential
neighborhoods or using surface streets used by other traffic.

2. It is close to complementary land uses, specifically the airport and other warehouses. Many people don't realize this, but about a quarter of trips originating from a warehouse have another warehouse as their destination* (imagine a truck from a Westinghouse warehouse sending appliances to a Home Depot warehouse). Clustering warehouses near each other and the airport reduces trip lengths and air quality impacts. It also facilitates the use of short-range electric trucks.

3. I have a job that pays well, that enables me to afford a nice house, as does nearly everyone who attended the ECOS meeting. I do not begrudge others the opportunity to enjoy the same things that my family does. This project will provide jobs to local residents who need them. Moreover, the close proximity between this site and Sacramento's large labor pool means that commutes will be relatively short. This is a low-VMT and traffic impact project.

4. Demand for warehouse space is growing as more and more commerce shifts to on-line sales. There is a reason why warehousing was one of only two development types that
continued unabated through the Great Recession and the
pandemic (the other was healthcare). Warehouses are most efficient when they are close to the areas they serve, which is why a site like this, close to a major city, is nearly ideal. It is hypocritical of people to oppose warehouse development near the city while still expecting same-day delivery of their Amazon Prime package.

Please consider the points above, and do not allow ECOS to have a heckler's veto on this project (i.e. whoever shouts the loudest wins).

Respectfully,
Don Hubbard, TE, AICP
*See High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study, SCAQMD, 2013 From: clerk
To: Agenda
Subject: Fw: Upper west side project
Date: Monday, September 29, 2025 7:35:54 AM
Attachments: 1px.png
From: Melissa Fogarty <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2025 10:44 AM
To: clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Upper west side project
I am writing to ask you to vote no on the Airport South Industrial Project in Natomas.

I oppose this project as the Garden Hwy can not accommodate more traffic.

The Sacramento and American Rivers are a jewel to Sacramento and must be protected!
This warehousing project is located next to a school, homes, and wildlife habitat. Impacts to neighbors include noise, lighting, air pollution, traffic, more trucks in the neighborhoods and more trucks on I-5.

The Plan is inconsistent with the Natomas Habitat Conservation Plan, City General Plan, County General Plan, SACOG Blueprint, Urban Services Boundary, Air Quality Plan, Metropolitan Transportation Plan.

The City should not develop farmland into warehouses. There are better, industrial-zoned locations for warehousing projects. It should pursue infill and renovation of aging facilities such as Blue Diamond and Arden Arcade.

More warehousing outside the urban core sucks jobs and business out of existing industrial areas.

I object to putting developer profits over sensible growth and community health. Only the property owner/developer benefits from this project; net revenue to the City has never been identified and $4 million estimated revenue hardly addresses the City's budget problems.

The project will be bad for the health of Natomas residents, particularly the children at the next-door Paso Verde school and the neighboring community.

Sincerely,
Melissa Fogarty
From: clerk
To: Agenda
Subject: Fw: Proposed Natomas Pro
Date: Monday, September 29, 2025 7:36:54 AM
From: Sandra Bertoux <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2025 8:59 PM
To: clerk <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed Natomas Pro
I am asking you to vote NO on the Upper Westside project including “warehouse sprawl”.

Do not destroy the careful balance of urban development and habitat conservation in Natomas.

Former Mayor Rubin who knows and understands the history and supporting agreements involved has led the charge on this topic. Perhaps you should pay close attention to what she has to say.

Just drive through North Natomas. That should most definitely give you an understanding regarding the pitfalls of unplanned urban development and warehouse sprawl. We are already experiencing the negativity of such.

Highway improvement has not improved traffic. And we are still asked to conserve energy while taxes increase. Plus, budgets still can’t be balanced. Does that sound like wise decision making?
Do the difficult but right thing — vote NO!
Sandra Bertoux
Natomas Resident
Sent from my iPhone
Dear Mayor and Council,
I am writing to ask you to vote no on the Airport South Industrial project in Natomas.

The warehousing project is located next to a school, homes, and wildlife habitat. Impacts to neighbors include additional noise, lighting and air pollution, traffic, more trucks on the neighborhoods and more trucks on I-5. The additional trucks are a safety hazard for the large number of children walking, biking, and riding scooters to and from school. This will directly impact me and my family and I am opposed to this development.

The city should not develop farmland into warehouses. There are better, industrial-zoned location for warehousing projects. The city should pursue infill and renovation of aging facilities such as Blue Diamond and Arden Arcade. More warehousing outside the urban core sucks jobs and businesses out of existing industrial areas. California has a huge urban sprawl problem, do not contribute further to the issue for something that is not needed in this location.

Sincerely,
Debi Nishimoto
270 Anjou Circle
Sacramento, CA 95835
1 July 30, 2025
City Clerk
City of Sacramento
915 I Street
Sacramento, California 95814
Re: This note accompanies a flash drive and explains the contents of the flash drive.

To the City Clerk:

On July 29, Sierra Club and Friends of the Swainson's Hawk delivered a letter to Mayor and City Council Members regarding "Deficiencies in Analysis and Mitigation for Protected Species in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Airport South Industrial Project." That letter and its attachments is copied to the flash drive transmitted to you today for the City Council record of consideration of the Airport South Industrial Project (P21-017).

This item has now been delayed and will not be heard August 12. Please retain these records for the hearing when scheduled.

Thank you,
Jude Lamare
Friends of the Swainson's Hawk
8867 Bluff Lane
Fair Oaks, CA 95628
916-769-2857
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
California/Nevada Operations Office
2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-2606
Sacramento, California 95825
FEB 21 2002 Gerry N. Kamilos
Metro Air Park Property Owners Association
2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 285
Sacramento, California 95825
Dear Mr. Kamilos:

Enclosed is a copy of your Endangered Species Act incidental take permit for the Metro Air Park Project. This permit authorizes incidental take of the threatened giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas) and valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus). The Permit would also cover 12 currently unlisted species, should they become listed during the 50-year life ofthe Permit. The project site is the 2,015-acre parcel in the Natomas Basin, Sacramento County, California. We look forward to assisting you in implementing your Habitat Conservation Plan.

Thank you for helping to conserve endangered species. Ifyou have any questions about this permit, please contact Mr. Wayne White, Field Supervisor ofthe Fish and Wildlife Service’s Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, at (916) 414-6000.

Sincerely,

Deputy Manager
Enclosures
DEPARTMENT OF the interior
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

FEDERAL FISH AND WILDLIFE PERMIT

1. PERMITTEE
metro air park property owners association
2277 FAIR OAKS BOULEVARD, SUITE 285
SACRAMENTO, CA 95825
U.S.A.

2. authority-statutes
1b USC 1539(A)
3-2Ql
(1/97)
REGULATIONS (Attached)
50 CFR 17.32
50 CFR 13

3. NUMBER
TE036473-0

4. renewable
□ YES
□NO
5 MAY COPY
□ YES
□NO

6. EFFECTIVE
02/21/2002

7. EXPIRES
02/20/2052

8. name and TITLE OF PRINCIPAL OFFICER (If#1 is business) GERRY N. KAMILOS

SECRETARY

9. TYPE OF PERMIT

THREATENED SPECIES

10. LOCATION WHERE AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY MAY BE CONDUCTED The 2,015-acre Metro Air Park Project Area within the Natomas Basin, Sacramento County. California 11 conDitions anD authorizations.

A. GENERAL CONDITIONS SE7 OUT IN SUBPART D OF 50 CPR 13. AND SPECIFIC CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN FEDERAL REGULATIONS CITED IN BLOCK #2 ABOVE, ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT. ALL ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED HEREIN MUST BE CARRTED OUT IN ACCORD WITH AND FOR THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED. CONTINUED VALIDITY, OR RENEWAL, OF THIS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETE AND TIMELY COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CONDITIONS INCLUDING THE FILING OF ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION AND REPORTS.

B. THE VALIDITY OF THIS PERMIT IS ALSO CONDITIONED UPON STRICT OBSERVANCE OF ALL APPLICABLE FOREIGN, STATE, LOCAL OR OTHER FEDERAL LAU C. VALID FOR USE BY PERMITTEE NAMED ABOVE.

D. Further conditions of authorization are contained in the attached Special Terms and Conditions.

AO ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AND AUTHORIZATIONS ALSO APPLY

12. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

ISSUED-BY

TITLE
DEPUTY MANAGER. CA/NV OPERATIONS OFFICE
DATE FEB 21 2002
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR TE036473-0