2025-01126 Airport South Industrial Annexation (P21-017) [Noticed on 11/07/2025; Published 11/07/2025; Passed for Publication 10/21/2025; Published 10/24/2025] — Sacramento City Council, December 2, 2025 (part 5 of 6)

909 12th Street, Suite 125, Sacramento, CA 95814
916-446-9255 • www.civicthread.org
• Provide, at minimum, a 3’ buffer to the 5’ bike lane on the southbound travel lane of Metro Air Parkway.
o The current configuration, at its widest, has a 5’ bike lane between a 14’ right turn lane and two 11’ travel lanes and one 11’ left turn lane. This is a very high stress configuration for cyclists.
• Increase all 5’ minimum bike lanes to Sacramento Street Design Standards (pg. 12) minimum designated 6’ bike lane width .
• Building from Airport South Industrial Drives 12’ walkway, implement a complete low-stress bike network allowing maximum protection for cyclists traveling between SMF, South Airport Industrial, and existing development to the east.

In addition to the recommended travel lane modifications described above, we strongly recommend the following connectivity considerations to support reduced demand for single occupancy vehicle trips and overall congestion along I-5 and within the nearby neighborhoods that may result from intensified land use development via the Upper Westside Specific Plan and other developments taking place in and around North Natomas.

Consideration and retention of access to the proposed site via the multi-use path traversing Egret Park to the southeast would allow for a low-stress, convenient means for active modes to access employment, the proposed restaurants, Sacramento International Airport (SMF) directly, or as discussed in the next section, access an intermediate transit stop for people traveling to or from the airport. The current proposed access to or from the site regardless of mode relies on Bayou Way at El Centro Road which proposes no bike lanes and 15’ travel lanes which will likely induce speeding and add significant stress to those who must bike to or from the location and dissuade would be travelers who may otherwise be interested in biking to or from the location.

As mentioned, circulation planning for this development should consider future transit connection opportunities. Currently, SacRT Bus Route 13 terminates in a loop near Del Paso Road and Hovnanian Drive with a stop at Del Paso Road and El Centro Road. A transit stop within the Airport South Industrial development should be incorporated in coordination with SacRT and to the extent feasible, a continuous, low-stress, route should be developed connecting these stops to incentivize alternatives to SOV trips.

Please notify Civic Thread of future routings or notices for this project.

Sincerely,
David Moore, AICP
Community Planning Specialist
December 5, 2024
Matthew Aijala
Assistant Planner, New Growth Section
300 Richards Blvd. 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
cc: Cheryle Hodge [email protected]
Garrett Norman [email protected]
Re: Draft EIR for the Airport South Industrial Annexation (P21-017) Dear Mr. Aijala:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on updated plans for the Airport South Industrial Annexation project (P21-017).

As you know, the Paso Verde School is located adjacent to, and south of the project site and the closest school building is approximately 250 from the project site as measured at the closest point.

An outdoor play area is in the northwestern portion of the school site, approximately 240 feet from the project site, as measured at the closest point. We understand that the Tentative Master Parcel Map currently before the City is focused on the project applicant sponsored lands. However, we have some requests that pertain to the environmental impact report (EIR) prepared for the whole of the requested actions that, in particular, focus on conditioning the future development of Parcel 8.

Air Quality - Mitigation Measure 4.3-1(b) – We appreciate the requirement for less polluting construction equipment, and believe that Tier 4 equipment should be available and used when electric equipment cannot be used on-site.

Air Quality – Mitigation Measure 4.3-2 – We appreciate the requirement for zero-emission forklifts for future development. We believe that this mitigation measure was likely intended to apply to all uses on-site that require forklifts, though the mitigation language currently limits this to industrial uses. It would help clarity to require zero-emission forklifts for all tenants, period.

Air Quality – Impact 4.3-3. We understand that the toxic air contaminants impact is reported for only the maximally exposed individual, and that the resulting cancer risk was 9.53 relative to a threshold of 10 excess cancer cases in a million and therefore less than significant. We also understand that no assumption for heavy duty trucks was included as a part of the EIR analysis. We would recommend developing a reasonable assumption for this non-participating parcel based on participating parcels and revising the HRA. This would be appropriate since the set of approvals would convey prezoning and ultimately zoning to the non-participating Parcel 8 and since an expectation of some heavy-duty truck activities on this property is not speculative. While not for the purposes of the HRA, for the purposes of the hazards analysis under Impact 4.7-3, the EIR did assume that Parcel 8 would be developed with warehousing to act as fulfilment centers for large regional retailers (EIR, page 4.7- 19). It appears that assumptions for the development of Parcel 8 were also used in the trip generation and transportation analysis (EIR, page 4.12-13 through 4.12-14).

In addition, please provide a buffer for the school site for Parcel 8 similar to the detention basin locations for other participating properties that effectively provide a buffer at the southern edge of the project site (Draft EIR, page 4.3-51). Figure 3-4 – Schematic Basin Drainage Plan, on page 3-11 of the Draft EIR shows a detention basin for Parcel 8 that is instead in the southwestern corner of Parcel 8, which would not provide a buffer for the school. Please condition the project to require the detention basin to provide a buffer along the southern portion of Parcel 8 or require some other type of buffer in this area. Please also include a condition that prohibits the use of airborne chemical applications on the southern portion of Parcel 8.

Air Quality - Mitigation Measure 4.3-3. Mitigation Measure 4.3-3 requires a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) prior to issuance of a building permit for development of Parcel 8 under certain conditions.

Please revise the mitigation language to make it clear that the HRA shall include not only emissions sources proposed on Parcel 8 but also for the entire project site.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Mitigation Measure 4.7-5(a). This mitigation measure includes options to prevent the establishment of resident populations of Canada geese on the project site that include the use of noise generators (e.g., pyrotechnic devices, blank cartridges) and the use of chemical repellents. If noise generators are to be used within the southern or southeastern portions of the project site when school is in session, please notify the Paso Verde School in advance. Please characterize the approach for chemical repellents to clarify that this would not include any airborne chemicals that would leave the project site.

Again, NUSD is very appreciative of the opportunity to provide comments on updated plans for the project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions about our requests.

Sincerely,
Lalanya Rothenberger
Executive Director, Facilities and Strategic Planning
Natomas Unified School District
Westlake Master Association
4701 Westlake Parkway, Sacramento, California 95835
916.621.3722
{5668.01/00651771.3}
August 24, 2023
Councilmember Lisa Kaplan District 1 Supervisor, Phil Serna Council District 1, 915 I Street, 5th Floor 700 H Street, Suite 2450 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Re: Opposition to Proposed Airport South Industrial Project in North Natomas We write to you, as the member elected Board of Directors of Westlake Master Association and seek your support in opposing the proposed Airport South Industrial Project, and hope you are committed to preserving the quality of life for residents of the Westlake community, which is part of North Natomas. Westlake is a residential community of over 3,000 residents living in over 900 homes and if approved the proposed Airport South Industrial Project would be immediately adjacent to and would negatively and significantly impact our community.

The proposed 419-acre Airport South Industrial Project is currently undergoing environmental and LAFCO review in connection with the developer NorthPoint's request to annex the project into the City of Sacramento. The Airport South Industrial Project would directly abut the Westlake residential community (current City boundary) and the recently opened Natomas Unified Paso Verde elementary and middle school. The development's location is also near sensitive and protected wetlands and wildlife habitat, including the nesting and foraging habitat for the Swainson's Hawk, which is listed as a threatened species by the State of California.

Westlake's Board and members have attended presentations on the project by representatives of NorthPoint and ECOS, the Environmental Council of Sacramento. We are advised this annexation would constitute one of the largest industrial projects in the City of Sacramento's history, and we cannot understand why the City would consider such a development directly next to a large residential community, a sensitive protected wetland and threatened species habitat, and a school with young children.

Westlake Master Association
4701 Westlake Parkway, Sacramento, California 95835
916.621.3722
{5668.01/00651771.3}
The proposed project consists of five warehouses of over 6.6 million square feet. The current Amazon warehouse, which is one of the largest industrial warehouses in the Sacramento region, is approximately 855,000 square feet, located on the north side of Interstate 5 at the Metro Air Park exit. This proposal constitutes a request to build more than the equivalent square footage of six new Amazon warehouses immediately next to the Westlake community, opening up industrial uses on the south side of Interstate 5. We encourage you to visit Metro Air Park to get a sense for what you are being asked to approve and ask yourselves whether you would deem such a project appropriate for your own neighborhood. Moreover, this development is not compliant with the North Natomas Community Plan.

It is clear the proposed project will produce significant negative impacts which cannot be mitigated, including excessive traffic, noise, air pollution, loss of open space and threatened species habitat, visual impact, and diminution of residential property values directly and negatively impacting the lives of the residents of the Westlake community.

As we await the release of the draft EIR with its analyses of these and other issues and will pay particular attention to the "no project" and "project alternatives" analyses which should be thorough. Given the numerous serious concerns listed above, and the negative impact this proposal will have on the Westlake community, our Board has unanimously voted to oppose the Airport South Industrial Project. Please add the Westlake Master Association to your project notification list.

On behalf of the Westlake community, we ask for your careful consideration and seek your support in opposing this proposal. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns and please contact us with any questions.

Sincerely,
Westlake Master Association
Monica Sanchez, President
Gabriela Alvarado, Vice President
Rajan Merchant, Treasurer
Jay Shukla, Secretary
Jonathan Burke, Director
Outlook
FW: Airport South Industrial Annexation - comments
From Garrett Norman <[email protected]>
Date Fri 2/28/2025 2:05 PM
To Matthew Aijala <[email protected]>
Cc Cheryle Hodge <[email protected]>
FYI. Please save to our public comment folder and include their email address for public hearing notices.

Garrett Norman
Senior Planner, North Area
Community Development Department
City of Sacramento
Phone: 916-808-7934
Email: [email protected]
300 Richards Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95811
https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/community-development
From: Y Campbell <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 12:46 PM
To: Garrett Norman <[email protected]>
Subject: Airport South Industrial Annexation - comments Hello,
I may have more comments later but here are some initial thoughts:

We need a strong buffer between the school, park, and
residential areas and this new proposal.

If there is covered parking for heat, then at least make them have solar panels above them so that cuts down on electricity usage (you can use them to power the lights or other needed city services).

Make sure there is plenty of lighting to deter crime and keep the area safer. Make sure the roadways are improved to handle the larger footprint.
2/28/25, 2:07 PM Mail - Matthew Aijala - Outlook
https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkAGIzYzFkNTQ0LWY1NzItNDQ3Mi1hOWEwLTYyM2M2YzJiNzQ0MwBGAAAAAADMc7JFpHEZRKUHrwf… 1/2 I'm not excited about losing more open space to yet more "industry". It would be nice if we keep some of our spaces wild and open.

Yating Campbell
Westshore resident
2/28/25, 2:07 PM Mail - Matthew Aijala - Outlook
https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkAGIzYzFkNTQ0LWY1NzItNDQ3Mi1hOWEwLTYyM2M2YzJiNzQ0MwBGAAAAAADMc7JFpHEZRKUHrwf… 2/2 www.ecosacramento.net

April 11, 2024
Maya Wallace, Chair, and Members of the City of Sacramento Planning and Design Commission Cheryl Hodge and Garrett Norman, Planners in Community Development Department Via email
Re: Planning and Design Commission Hearing April 11, 2024 Discussion Calendar Item 5: Airport South Industrial Project File ID: 2024-00766 Dear Chair Wallace, Commissioners, and Staff,
We understand your review of the Airport South Industrial Project at this point is for general background, given that the Sacramento Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCo) has been asked to consider approval of a Sphere of Influence change to the City for the project.

Since the Draft EIR for the project is not yet out for review, that document’s analysis of the environmental impacts is not available to you.

We appreciate this opportunity to share our concerns
with you.

LAFCo should not, in our view, approve a Sphere of
Influence change to the City for this development, for
the reasons below and because of LAFCo’s own goals
shown in the image at right.

ECOS opposes the Airport South Industrial Project for
the following reasons:
• It is located outside both Sacramento County’s Urban Services Boundary and the City limits. • The project location and use are inconsistent with the City and County general plans, the SACOG Blueprint, the Natomas Basin HCP, and LAFCo goals. • It will have harmful direct impacts on the Paso Verde school, the Westlake neighborhood, and the nearby preserve land, including Fisherman’s Lake – impacts to air quality, traffic, property values, etc.
2 of 2
• There are other available sites within the City and County, including Metro Air Park on the Northside of I-5, that are already zoned for industrial uses. City of Sacramento development investments should occur in infill areas, not in greenfield areas that worsen sprawl. There are many areas in the City where this development and these jobs would be welcome and have a great positive impact.
• This project is proceeding at the request of the applicant, not the City. The Airport South Industrial Project has never been to City Council for them to authorize proceeding with either a Sphere of Influence request or annexation. In 2022, when ECOS asked for the project to be removed from the consent calendar and given a full hearing, City staff instead sent it to LAFCo without Council or public input.

Two additional points:

The suggestion of a hotel should be checked against allowable uses in the airport flight path.

Farmland should not be referred to as “vacant land.”
Thank you for your consideration of our comments.

Sincerely,
Susan Herre AIA AICP Heather Fargo
President of the Board of Directors Former Mayor, Lead ECOS Natomas Team April 10, 2024
Kelly Boyle
Associate Planner
Community Development Planner
Community Development Department
[email protected]
Re: Airport South Industrial Project (P21-017)
Kelly Boyle:

This leƩer is in response to the NoƟce of Public Hearing for the Airport South Industrial Project (P21-017) (the “Project”) by the Community Development Department dated March 29, 2024.

The Project applicant is requesƟng a Sphere of Influence Amendment, ReorganizaƟon (AnnexaƟon and Detachment), Property Tax Exchange Agreement, Development Agreement, Public FaciliƟes Finance Plan, General Plan Map Amendment, Prezone, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Establishment (including a PUD SchemaƟc Plan and Guidelines), Project Municipal Services Review, and a Plan for Services.

As agendized, there is no acƟon to be taken on the Project or any of the Project’s components. Rather the item is listed as only an “informaƟonal item.” Thus, no acƟon or commitment may be taken, and notwithstanding the erroneous informaƟon on your noƟce, there is no requirement to raise any or all project defects now in order to subsequently bring legal challenge.

Seƫng aside that fact, certain issues should be appreciated regarding the Project.

First, the Project would be in violaƟon of the City’s Incidental Take Permit stemming from the June 24, 2003 biological/conference opinion of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, thereby puƫng the City’s 50- year permit at risk.

Second, the Project would destroy approximately 12 acres of federally recognized wetlands including freshwater forested wetlands, freshwater emergent wetlands, and riverine habitat.

Third, the Project would re-route an exisƟng public road from a locaƟon adjacent to Interstate 5 to a locaƟon 200 feet from Sacramento City residents’ front doors. This same road would connect to fast food restaurants, a gas staƟon, and millions of square feet of industrial warehouse uƟlized by heavy trucks.

Thank you,
Sacramento CiƟzens for Equitable Development

BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW
10250 CONSTELLATION BOULEVARD
SUITE 2300
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067
(213) 572-0400
#0H

)2>CC!>7=B>=

)4=8>A&;0==4A)(!>7=B>=28CH>5B02A0<4=C> >A6 8CH>5)02A0<4=C>><<D=8CH4E4;>?<4=C4?0AC<4=C

(8270A3B>D;4E0A3*78A3
;>>A
)02A0<4=C>

&
%

! %$!

#"!#%!&% &$%#

#!
%

40A#A !>7=B>=
*70=:H>D5>AC74>??>ACD=8CHC>2><<4=C>=C74
8=0;
=E8A>=<4=C0; <?02C(4?>AC

(5>A
C74 ?A>?>B438A?>AC)>DC7 =3DBCA80;&A>942C &;40B4 0224?C0=3 2>=B834AC74B4 2><<4=CB >= 1470;5>5
>;34=)C0C4
=E8A>=<4=C0;!DBC824;;80=24 ;B>
>;34=)C0C4
=E8A>=<4=C0;!DBC824
;;80=24 5>A<0;;H A4@D4BCB C> 14 03343 C> C74 ?D1;82 8=C4A4BC ;8BC A460A38=6 0=H BD1B4@D4=C 4=E8A>=<4=C0;3>2D<4=CB?D1;82=>C824B?D1;82740A8=6B0=3=>C824B>534C4A<8=0C8>= 5>AC78B ?A>942C )4=30;;2><<D=820C8>=BC>
>;34=)C0C4
=E8A>=<4=C0;!DBC824;;80=24& % >G

>A>=0

/((
,2
*74?A>?>B43?A>942CF>D;38=2;D34C7434E4;>?<4=C>50=8=3DBCA80;?0A:F8C78=0=0??A>G8<0C4;H 02A4?>AC8>=>5C74?A>942C B8C4;>20C438<<4380C4;HB>DC7>50H>D-0H *748=3DBCA80; ?0A: F>D;3 0;;>F 5>A 2>=BCAD2C8>= >5 D? C>

B@D0A4 544C B5 >5 8=3DBCA80; DB4B >=
0??A>G8<0C4;H
02A4B0BF4;;0B0??A>G8<0C4;H

B5>5A4C08;
7867F0H2><<4A280;DB4B
8=2;D38=60??A>G8<0C4;H

B5>57>C4;
7>B?8C0;8CH>=0??A>G8<0C4;H
02A4B *7A>D67>DC
C74
(C74C4A<O8=3DBCA80; ?0A:P8BDB430B0=D<1A4;;0C4A< 5>AC74?A>?>B438=3DBCA80;0=3 A4C08;
7867F0H2><<4A280;DB4B *7DBD=;4BB038BC8=2C8>=14CF44=C74?A>?>B438=3DBCA80;0=3 A4C08;
7867F0H2><<4A280;DB4B8BB?4285820;;H3458=43C74C4A<O8=3DBCA80;?0A:P20=140BBD<43 C>8=2>A?>A0C41>C7>5C745>A46>8=6DB4B
&0A24;BC7A>D670=3C7A>D670A4?A>?>B43A4C08; 7867F0H2><<4A280;DB4B64=4A0;;H
B8CD0C43B>DC7>5C748=C4AB42C8>=>5 0=3#4CA>8A&0A:F0H &0A24;B C7A>D670;;?;0==43
5>A8=3DBCA80;DB464=4A0;;HBDAA>D=3C74?A>?>B43A4C08; 7867F0H2><<4A280;DB4B &0A24;C74
A4<08=8=6?A>?>B438=3DBCA80;DB4F>D;314;>20C438=C74=>AC740BC2>A=4A>5C74B8C4 *74?A>942C Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 2 ends

B8C4 0;B> 8=2;D34B B4E4A0; =>=?0AC828?0C8=6 ?0A24;B 2><?A8B43 >5 0??A>G8<0C4;H 02A4B 0=3 F>D;3A4BD;C8=58ABCC84A4=C8C;4<4=CB5>A5DCDA48=3DBCA80;DB4B>50??A>G8<0C4;H

B5
=3DBCA80;+B4B
*74C>C0;4BC8<0C43B@D0A45>>C064>58=3DBCA80;1D8;38=6BF>D;314

B5F8C78=58E4?0A24;B
C>C0;8=6
02A4B *740A40>54027>5C7405>A4<4=C8>=43 ?0A24;B0=30BB>280C43F0A47>DB4 1D8;38=6BF>D;3140B5>;;>FB
&0A24;
02A4B

B51D8;38=6
&0A24;
02A4B

B51D8;38=6
&0A24; 02A4B

B51D8;38=60=3
&0A24; 02A4B

B51D8;38=6
><<4A280;+B4B
*74 2><<4A280; 2><?>=4=C >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F>D;3 8=2;D34 B8G ;>CB 2><?A8B43 >5 0??A>G8<0C4;H

B5>5A4C08;
7867F0H2><<4A280;DB4B8=2;D38=60??A>G8<0C4;H

B5>5
7>C4;
7>B?8C0;8CH>=0??A>G8<0C4;H
02A4B ;;B8GA4C08;
7867F0H2><<4A280;;>CBF>D;314
2;DBC4A43B>DC7>5C748=C4AB42C8>=>5 0=3#4CA>8A&0A:F0H=40AC7424=C4A>5C74?A>942CB8C4 *740A40>54027>5C7405>A4<4=C8>=43?0A24;B0=30BB>280C432><<4A280;1D8;38=6BF>D;3140B 5>;;>FB
&0A24;

02A4B

B5A4BC0DA0=C1D8;38=6
&0A24;
02A4B

B55D4;8=6BC0C8>=
20AF0B7
&0A24;
02A4B

B57>C4;1D8;38=6
&0A24;
02A4B

B5A4BC0DA0=C1D8;38=60=3
&0A24;
02A4B

B5A4BC0DA0=C1D8;38=6
$>=?0AC828?0C8=6&0A24;B
*74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C8=2;D34B B4E4A0; =>=?0AC828?0C8=6 ?0A24;B2><?A8B43 >5 0??A>G8<0C4;H 02A4BF7827F>D;3A4248E458ABCC84A4=C8C;4<4=CBBD270BC74?A>?>B43)% <4=3<4=CC>0<4=3 C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>)% 0=3==4G0C8>=>5C74B8C48=C>C748CH;8<8CB0=3)02)4F4AB4AE824 0A40 5>A 5DCDA48=3DBCA80; DB4B >50??A>G8<0C4;H

B5 *74B4 5DCDA4 34E4;>?<4=C0A40B
8=2;D34B8G4G8BC8=6?0A24;B2>=CA>;;431HB4?0A0C4>F=4ABF78270A4BD<<0A8I430B5>;;>FB &0A24; 02A4B0H>220
&0A24; 02A4B0<?14;;
&0A24;

02A4B B6DA*ADBC0=3
&0A24;

02A4&0C4;
8B2A4C8>=0AH02C8>=BA4@D8A43C>0??A>E4C74?A>?>B43?A>942C8=2;D34 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 3 ends

"
>0??A>E0;>50)?74A4>5 =5;D4=24)% <4=3<4=CC>0<4=3C748CH>5)02A0<4=C> )%

"
>0??A>E0;>5==4G0C8>=>5C74?A>942CB8C48=C>C748CH;8<8CB0=3)02)4F4AB4AE824 0A40
8CH>5)02A0<4=C>0??A>E0;>50
4=4A0;&;0=<4=3<4=C>5C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>

4=4A0;&;0=C>8=2;D34C741>D=30A84B>5C748=3DBCA80;?0A: 5>>C?A8=C0=3=>=?0AC828?0C8=6 ?0A24;BC>C0;>5
02A4BM=>C8=2;D38=6A>03F0HB0B
<?;>H<4=C#8G43+B4
8CH>5)02A0<4=C>0??A>E0;>50&A4I>=8=6>5
02A4B=>C8=2;D38=6A>03F0HBC>#

&+0=3
02A4B=>C8=2;D38=6A>03F0HBC>&+5>AC748=3DBCA80;?0A:?>AC8>=>5 C74B8C40=302A4BC>#
5>AC74=>=?0AC828?0C8=6?0A24;B
8CH>5)02A0<4=C>0??A>E0;>50&+)274<0C82&;0=0=3&+ D834;8=4B
8CH>5)02A0<4=C>0??A>E0;>50*4=C0C8E4#0BC4A&0A24;#0? 8CH>5)02A0<4=C>0??A>E0;>504E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C 8CH>5)02A0<4=C>0??A>E0;>50
8=0=24&;0=
>D=CH>5)02A0<4=C>0??A>E0;>50&A>?4ACH*0G
G270=646A44<4=C
*74

(
(4B?>=B4C>><<4=CB70B=>C034@D0C4;H022DA0C4;H>A5D;;H033A4BB434027>5C74 2><<4=CB8=><<4=C"4CC4A
*74A45>A4><<4=C"4CC4A
8BA48=2>A?>A0C438=8CB4=C8A4CH
0=38=2;D3430B0=0CC027<4=C74A4
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(02:=>F;4364BC70CO0=
(8B A4@D8A43C>34<>=BCA0C47>F0?A>942CF>D;32><?;H F8C70;;0??;8201;4A46D;0C8>=BA4;0C43C>0E>838=6?>C4=C80;;HB86=85820=C4=E8A>=<4=C0;8<?02CB 0=38BA4@D8A43C>?A>E8340;;3>2D<4=C0C8>==424BB0AHC>3>B> -74A4B?4285828=5>A<0C8>=8B=>C H4C0E08;01;4BD270B?0A:8=6;>20C8>=BC74F>ABC20B42>=38C8>=B0A40BBD<43B>0BC>?A>E8340 2>=B4AE0C8E4 0=0;HB8B P *74
(
G42DC8E4 )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C C74 3>2D<4=C ?A>E834B 0 ?A>942CB?428582 0=0;HB8B ?DABD0=CC>
'
D834;8=4B )42C8>=

*74A45>A4 0;; ?A>942C
B?428582&;0==8=6??;820C8>=8C4<B<DBC14?A>E83438=C748AF7>;40=32><?;4C45>A<8=>A34A C>?A>E8340=034@D0C40=3022DA0C44=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B *74

(BC0C4BC70CC74?A>942C
OF8;;144E0;D0C435>A2><?;80=24F8C70;;0??;8201;4BC0=30A3BPF78278=3820C4BC70C8C70B=>C 2DAA4=C;H144=4E0;D0C435>A2><?;80=24F8C70;;0??;8201;4BC0=30A3B0BA4@D8A431H0&A>942C (
*74

(0;B>BC0C4BC70CO CB7>D;314=>C43C70C?0A:8=60=3;>038=63>2:0A40B20=14834=C85843 0=3 8=54AA43 10B43 >= C74 )8C4 &;0=P F7827 8B <8B;4038=6 C> C74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 34=C85820C8>=0=38=54A4=240A4=>CC74B0<4 O 34=C85820C8>=P8=B8=D0C4BC70CB><4C78=68B2;40A;H <0A:43>A34;8=40C43 O =54A4=24P8=3820C4BC70CB><4C78=68B=>C2;40A;H3458=430=3C74>1B4AE4A 20=3A0FC748A>F=2>=2;DB8>=BF78270A4=>C6D0A0=C443C>14022DA0C4 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 4 ends

338C8>=0;;H C74 ?0A:8=6
;>038=6 3>2: 0A40B 0A4 =>C 834=C85843 >= C74 )8C4 &;0= 0=3 8C 8B =>C 0??A>?A80C4C>4=2>DA064C74?D1;82
3428B8>=<0:4ABC>O8=54APC748A;>20C8>=0=3;0H>DC *74

(
0CC4<?CB C> <8B;403 C74 ?D1;82
3428B8>= <0:4AB 8= C78B BC0C4<4=C F7827 3>4B =>C 4@D0C4 C> 38B2;>B8=6C748ACAD4;>20C8>=B0BA4@D8A431H
'RB10B82C4=4CB>5?D1;8238B2;>BDA40=3022DA0C4
8=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB *74
(8BA4@D8A43C>?A>E8340?A>942CB?4285820=0;HB8B0BA4@D8A43 1H
'
D834;8=4B)42C8>=

A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34F7>;;H022DA0C4
0=3D=438C4334C08;435;>>A?;0=6A038=6?;0=B8C4?;0=1D8;38=64;4E0C8>=B0=3?A>942C=0AA0C8E4 5>A?D1;82A4E84F
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(A4;84BD?>=C740??A>E0;>5C74&+
D834;8=4BC>9DBC85H4G2;DB8>=>5C740A278C42CDA0;
1D8;38=6 4;4E0C8>=B 1420DB4 *74
( 8B A4@D8A43 C> ?A>E834 0 ?A>942CB?428582 0=0;HB8B 0B A4@D8A431H
'
D834;8=4B)42C8>=

*74
(3>4B=>C?A>E834B?428582B>5C74&+

D834;8=4B 0=3 0= 0=0;HB8B >5 C748A 2><?;80=24 F8C7 >A 34E80C8>=B 5A>< C74 8CH BC0=30A3 A4@D8A4<4=CB0A4A4@D8A43 *74?D1;82
3428B8>=<0:4AB0A4D=0F0A4>5C746D834;8=4B
34E4;>?<4=C
BC0=30A3B?A>?>B438=C74&+
D834;8=4BF78273>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7
'RB10B82C4=4CB>5
?D1;82 38B2;>BDA4 0=3 022DA0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB *74 ?D1;82 3428B8>= <0:4AB 20==>C
A4E84FC740A278C42CDA0;1D8;38=64;4E0C8>=B5>A10B828=5>A<0C8>=;8:4C>C0;1D8;38=674867C<D27 ;4BB A4E84FC78B8=022>A30=24F8C7C74BC0=30A38CH A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A74867C0=3C74?A>?>B43 &+
D834;8=4B 5>A 74867C A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 F7>;;H 022DA0C4 0=3 D=438C4334C08;435;>>A?;0=6A038=6?;0=B8C4?;0=1D8;38=64;4E0C8>=B0=3?A>942C=0AA0C8E45>A ?D1;82A4E84F
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(BC0C4BC70C*740=0;HB8B>5C74A05C
(8B10B43>=C748=5>A<0C8>=?A>E83431HC74
?A>942C 0??;820=C C70C 0??A>G8<0C4;H

2D182 H0A3B >5 B>8; F>D;3 14 8<?>AC43 3DA8=6
6A038=6 P608=C74A48B=><4C7>3 5>AC74?D1;82
3428B8>=<0:4ABC>A4E84FC78BBC0C4<4=C>5
8=5>A<0C8>= ?A>E8343 1HC740??;820=C *74A48B =>8=5>A<0C8>= A460A38=6C74<4C7>3>;>6H >A B>DA24C70C A4BD;C438=C74 20;2D;0C8>=C70CC74 ?A>942C F8;; A4@D8A4

2D182 H0A3B >5 B>8;
8<?>AC *74A4 8B => <4C7>3 5>A C74 ?D1;82
3428B8>= <0:4AB C> E4A85H C78B BC0C4<4=C *74

(

(70B=>C?A>E83430=HBD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C>BD??>ACC78B2;08< *78B0;B>3>4B=>C 2><?;HF8C7
'RBA4@D8A4<4=CB5>A?D1;8238B2;>BDA40=3034@D0C48=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB *74
( 8B A4@D8A43 C> ?A>E834 0 ?A>942CB?428582 0=0;HB8B 0BA4@D8A43 1H '
D834;8=4B
)42C8>=

A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34F7>;;H022DA0C40=3D=438C4334C08;43 5;>>A?;0=6A038=6?;0=B8C4?;0=1D8;38=64;4E0C8>=B0=3?A>942C=0AA0C8E45>A?D1;82A4E84F !-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

( 28C4B C7A44 4G0<?;4B >5 20B4 ;0F A4;0C43 C> C74 018;8CH >5 0= ( C> 4G2;D34 0
4E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C 5A>< ?D1;82 A4E84F0B9DBC85820C8>= 5>A4G2;D38=6C74&+)274<0C82 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 5 ends

&;0=&+
D834;8=4B*4=C0C8E4#0BC4A&0A24;#0?4E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C 8=0=24&;0=0=3
&A>?4ACH *0G
G270=64 6A44<4=C 5A>< ?D1;82 A4E84F 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C *74

(
4G2;D34B C70C C74 2>DACRB 3428B8>=B 8= C74B4 20B4B F4A4 10B43 >= C74 ?;08=C855 =>C 034@D0C4;H 34<>=BCA0C8=6C70CC748A4G2;DB8>=O?A42;D34B<40=8=65D;3428B8>=<0:8=6>A?D1;822><<4=CP
0BC )02A0<4=C> &0AC=4AB78? 5>A 0 "8E01;4 8CH E 8CH >5 )02A0<4=C>

*74 ?A>?>B43
?A>942CRB &+ )274<0C82 &;0= &+
D834;8=4B 0=3 *4=C0C8E4 #0BC4A &0A24; #0? 0A4 0;; =424BB0AH5>A<40=8=65D;3428B8>=<0:8=60=3?D1;822><<4=C0BBC0C43C7A>D67>DCC78B;4CC4A >DA?A4E8>DB;4CC4A><<4=C"4CC4A
8=C74

(0=30;;0CC027<4=CB 338C8>=0;;HB8=24C74
?A>942CA4@D8A4B0)% <4=3<4=C4G?0=3BC74DA10=6A>FC71>D=30A84B>5C748CH14H>=30;; ;>20; >A A468>=0; ?;0=B 0=3 B86=85820=C;H 2>=CA81DC4B C> D=?;0==43 42>=><82 0=3 ?>?D;0C8>= 6A>FC78C8BE8C0;5>AC74?D1;82C>A4E84FC74?A>?>B434E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C 8=0=24&;0=
0=3&A>?4ACH*0G
G270=646A44<4=CC>0B24AC08=C74?A>942CRB?>C4=C80;;HB86=85820=C8<?02CB A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34C742><?;4C4&+)274<0C82&;0=&+ D834;8=4B
*4=C0C8E4#0BC4A&0A24;#0?4E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C
8=0=24&;0=0=3&A>?4ACH*0G
G270=64
6A44<4=C0B0CC027<4=CB5>AA4E84F0=0;HB8B0=32><<4=C1HC74?D1;820=33428B8>=<0:4AB 8= >A34A C> 2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D;38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3&(

1
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

( BC0C4B C70C O>=CA0AH C> C74 2><<4=C4ARB 2;08< C70C C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 3>4B =>C 2><?;H F8C7 &+ )42C8>=

1 )%
?A4?0A43 0= "+ &A4;8<8=0AH (4E84F 0=3
?A>E83432>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;5>AC74?A>942CRB2><?0C818;8CHF8C7C74)02A0<4=C> =C4A=0C8>=0; 8A?>ACRB "+& B BD27 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 70B 144= ?A>E8B8>=0;;H 0??A>E43 5>A 2><?0C818;8CHF8C7C74"+&1HC74)%
"+ 5C7434B86=>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942C8B=>C
2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C742>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;3428343D?>=1HC74)% "+C74?A>942CF>D;3
1434=8430=334E4;>?<4=CF>D;3=>C>22DA P>F4E4AC74)% "+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F
0=3 2>=38C8>=B >5 0??A>E0; 0A4 =>C 8=2;D343 5>A ?D1;82 A4E84F F7827 3>4B =>C 2><?;H F8C7
'RBA4@D8A4<4=CB5>A034@D0C48=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB0=3<40=8=65D;38B2;>BDA4 'K

0=3&(

1 =2>A?>A0C8>=1HA454A4=24
'K

58B=>C0??A>?A80C40B
C74)%
"+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;2>=CA81DC438A42C;HC>0=0;HB8B >5C74?A>1;4<0C70=3 A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34C74)%
"+&A4;8<8=0AH
(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;5>AA4E84F0=0;HB8B0=32><<4=C1HC74?D1;820=33428B8>= <0:4AB8=>A34AC>2><?;HF8C7
'RBA4@D8A4<4=CB5>A034@D0C48=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB0=3 <40=8=65D;38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3&(

1
B BC0C438=><<4=C "4CC4A
C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C A4@D8A4B0
4=4A0; &;0=<4=3<4=CC>
270=64C74;0=3DB434B86=0C8>=>=C74?A>942CB8C4 &A8>AC>C740<4=3<4=C>50 4=4A0;&;0=C74
"+ B70;; A4E84FC74 ?;0= >A38=0=24 >A A46D;0C8>= 5>A 2>=B8BC4=2H F8C7 C74 "+& &+ Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 6 ends

)42C8>=

1 *74

(DC8;8I4B)%
RB0;;4643A4E84F0B9DBC85820C8>=5>A2><?;80=24
F8C7 &+ )42C8>=

1 *74

(

( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H BD1BC0=C80; 4E834=24C>
BD??>ACC742;08<C70CC74?A>942C2><?;84BF8C7&+)42C8>=

1C74"+&0=3>A0;4BB
C70=B86=85820=C58=38=6 ><<4=C4ABA4B4AE4C74A867CC>2>=C8=D4C78B2><<4=C0=30=0;HB8B>= C78BC>?82B7>D;3C740;;4643)%
"+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;14 8=2;D3438=0A4E8B43
(
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(

(3>4B=>C2>=B834AC74B?4285828=C4=C0=3?DA?>B4>5C74 <?;>H<4=C#8G43+B4
;0=3DB434B86=0C8>=F78278BOC>1D554AA4B834=C80;DB4B5A><<>A48=C4=B48=3DBCA80;0=3B4AE824 2><<4A280;02C8E8C84B0=3C>?A>E8342><?0C81;44<?;>H<4=CDB4B=40A78674A34=B8CH0=3<8G43 DB47>DB8=6 P*748=C4=C>5C74 =3DBCA80;#8G43+B4;0=3 DB434B86=0C8>=8BC>022><<>30C4 8=3DBCA80;DB4BC70CO70E407867E>;D<4>5CAD2:CA05582 P*01;4

&A>942C*A8?
4=4A0C8>=M
=3DBCA80;&;0==43+=8C4E4;>?<4=C+B4BF8C78=C74A05C (2>=2;D34BC70CC74?A>942CF8;;
64=4A0C4
308;H740EH3DCHCAD2:CA8?B 740EH3DCHCAD2:CA8?0=0;HB8BF0B=>C2>=3D2C43 5>AC74867F0H><<4A280;DB4B B>C74 ?A>942CF8;;02CD0;;H 64=4A0C4<>A4C70= 308;H
740EH 3DCH CAD2: CA8?B *74 ?A>942CRB 7867 E>;D<4 >5 CAD2: CA05582 0=3 8=2><?0C818;8CH F8C7 A4B834=C80; DB4B B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 2D<D;0C8E4;H 2>=B834A01;4 8<?02CB C> 4BC74C82B 6A82D;CDA0;(4B>DA24B8A'D0;8CH0=3
A44=7>DB4
0B
<8BB8>=BA4=34AB8C8=2><?0C81;4F8C7
C74 ?A>?>B43
<?;>H<4=C#8G43+B4;0=3 DB434B86=0C8>= *74?A>942C8B2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74 =3DBCA80;#8G43+B434B86=0C8>= >F4E4AC74
4=4A0;&;0=BC0C4BC70CC74 =3DBCA80;#8G43+B4
34B86=0C8>=OB7>D;3=>C14;>20C43=4GCC>0A4B834=C80;=48671>A7>>3F8C7>DCBD1BC0=C80;1D554AB 8 4 >55824DB4BA468>=0;?0A:B6A44=F0HB>A>?4=B?024P<40=8=6C70C8CB7>D;3=>C140??;843 C>C74?A>942CB8C44E4=C7>D678C8BC740??A>?A80C4;0=3DB434B86=0C8>=5>AC74?A>?>B43?A>942C *74
( <DBC 14 A4E8B43 C> 8=2;D34 C78B 8=5>A<0C8>= 5>A 0=0;HB8B 0=3 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 0B C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 8B =>C 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 C74 <?;>H<4=C #8G43+B4
34B86=0C8>=

DAC74A 0B B7>F= 14;>F C74
4=4A0; &;0= ?A>E834B 4G0<?;4B >5 C74 CH?4 >5 34E4;>?<4=C 64=4A0C431HC74
<?;>H<4=C#8G43+B40=3 =3DBCA80;#8G43+B434B86=0C8>=B *74?A>?>B43 ?A>942C8B2;40A;HA45;42C8E4>5C74 =3DBCA80;#8G43+B4;0=3DB434B86=0C8>=
%0-*362-%-64368
0%22-2+%2(#7)%2(&33/!)'8-32
# ):-);,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(*
%0-*362-%-64368
0%22-2+%2(#7)%2(&33/!)'8-32
# ):-);,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(* Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 7 ends

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 8 ends

!-+*)-!.**((!).

)

*74

(0BB4ACBC70CO0=HA4B834=C80;DB4B0BB>280C43F8C7C746A82D;CDA0;A>?;0=3;0=3DB4 34B86=0C8>= 0A4 ?A4BD<43 C> 14 0BB>280C43 F8C7 BD27 06A82D;CDA0; 02C8E8C84B B BD27 F78;4 A4B834=C80; DB4B 0A4 0;;>F01;4 D=34A C74 6A82D;CDA0; A>?;0=3 ;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>= C74 34B86=0C8>=8B=>C2>=B834A43C>14A4B834=C80; P*74>DB8=6A8B8B2C>5

)4=0C4
8;; )

) 3> =>C ?A>E834 0=H @D0;85820C8>=B >= />=8=6 34B86=0C8>=B C70C ?4A<8C A4B834=C80;34E4;>?<4=C>AB?4285HC70CA4B834=C80;DB4B<DBC14C74?A8<0AHDB48=>A34A5>AC74 A46D;0C8>=BC>0??;H *74
)

)8B1A>03;HB2>?43C>A4@D8A4 A4?;024<4=C 7>DB8=6 B8C4BF74=0=H;0=3C70C?4A<8CB7>DB8=634E4;>?<4=C4G?4A84=24B;0=3DB4270=64BC>4=BDA4=> =4C;>BB>57>DB8=620?028CH *74
(BC0C4BC70CO10B43>=C744G8BC8=6)02A0<4=C>>D=CH

4=4A0;&;0=;0=3DB40=3I>=8=634B86=0C8>=B5>AC74?A>942CB8C4A4B834=C80;34E4;>?<4=CF0B =>C0=C828?0C430CC74?A>942CB8C4 P>F4E4AC78BBC0C4<4=C8B4AA>=4>DB0=3<8B;4038=6C>C74 ?D1;820=33428B8>=<0:4AB0=3<DBC14A4?;0243F8C7502CD0;8=5>A<0C8>=0B?0AC>50A4E8B43 (
*74?A>942CB8C470B0=4G8BC8=6)02A0<4=C>>D=CH"0=3+B4 ;4<4=C34B86=0C8>=>56A82D;CDA0;
A>?;0=3
F7827O0;;>FBB8=6;450<8;H3F4;;8=6D=8CB0C034=B8CH=>6A40C4AC70= 02A4B?4A
D=8C P*74A45>A4C74 02A4?A>942CB8C470B0=4G8BC8=6A4B834=C80;34E4;>?<4=C20?028CH>5

3F4;;8=6D=8CB0=3C74
)

)0??;HC>C74?A>942CB8C4

>E4A=<4=C>34)42C8>=

1
A4@D8A4BC70C064=284B B70;; =>C “270=64C74 64=4A0; ?;0=;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>= B?428582 ?;0=;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>=>AI>=8=6C>0;4BB8=C4=B8E4 DB4 14;>FF70CF0B0;;>F43D=34AC74;0=3DB434B86=0C8>=0=3I>=8=6>A38=0=24B8=45542C0CC74C8<4 >5C74?A>?>B43270=64 P+=34A
>E4A=<4=C>34)42C8>=

1
0“;4BB8=C4=B8E4DB4P
8=2;D34B1DC8B=>C;8<8C43C>A43D2C8>=BC>74867C34=B8CH>A5;>>A0A40A0C8>=4F>A8=2A40B43 >?4=B?024>A;>CB8I4A4@D8A4<4=CB>A=4F>A8=2A40B43B4C102:A4@D8A4<4=CB<8=8<D<5A>=C064 A4@D8A4<4=CB>A<0G8<D<;>C2>E4A064;8<8C0C8>=B>A0=H>C74A02C8>=C70CF>D;38=38E83D0;;H>A 2D<D;0C8E4;HA43D24A4B834=C80;34E4;>?<4=C20?028CH &DABD0=CC>) A4?;024<4=C20?028CH
5>A0=H38B?;0243A4B834=C80;D=8CB<DBC14?A>E8343*)/,,!).'20CC74.%(!*"+,*&!. ++,*0
'

>E4A=<4=C>34)42C8>=

78
BC0C4BC70COC78BB42C8>=3>4B=>C?A>7818C0=05542C43 2>D=CH>A0=05542C4328CH8=2;D38=6C74;>20;4;42C>A0C402C8=6C7A>D67C748=8C80C8E4?A>24BB5A>< 270=68=6 0 ;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>= >A I>=8=6 >A38=0=24 C> 0 ;4BB 8=C4=B8E4 DB4 >A A43D28=6 C74 8=C4=B8CH >5 ;0=3 DB4 85 C74 28CH >A 2>D=CH 2>=2DAA4=C;H 270=64B C74 34E4;>?<4=C BC0=30A3B ?>;8284B0=32>=38C8>=B0??;8201;4C>>C74A?0A24;BF8C78=C749DA8B382C8>=C>4=BDA4C70CC74A48B=> =4C;>BB8=A4B834=C80;20?028CH PB20;2D;0C4301>E4C74?A>942CB8C4RB)02A0<4=C>>D=CH"0=3
397-2+6-7-7'83*!
,88470)+-2*30)+-70%896)'%+3:*%')7&-00")<80-)28<,810&-00$-(!
!,88470)+-2*30)+-70%896)'%+3:*%')7&-00")<80-)28<,810&-00$-(! ,884740%22-2+7%''3928=+3:3'91)287%2(#7)0)1)281)2()( 4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 9 ends

+B4
;4<4=C 34B86=0C8>= >5 6A82D;CDA0; A>?;0=3 ?A>E834B 34E4;>?<4=C 20?028CH 5>A

A4B834=C80; D=8CB 3>?C8>= >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 )% <4=3<4=C 4=4A0; &;0= <4=3<4=C 0=3
&A4I>=8=6 0B ?0AC >5C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F8;; A4BD;C 8= 0 A43D2C8>= >5 C74 4G8BC8=6 A4B834=C80; 34E4;>?<4=C20?028CH1H

D=8CBC>0342A40B4334E4;>?<4=C20?028CH>5
A4B834=C80;D=8CB
*78B8B8=2>=5;82CF8C7)C70C4G?0=343C74?A>E8B8>=B>5C74C>8=2;D34 >E4A=<4=C>34
)42C8>=

78
A4@D8A8=62>=2DAA4=C0??A>E0;>5A4?;024<4=CB8C4BC>4=BDA4=>=4C;>BB8= A4B834=C80;20?028CH0=3)42C8>=

7
3458=8=6“2>=2DAA4=C;HPC><40=C7402C8>=8B
0??A>E430CC74B0<4<44C8=6>5C74;468B;0C8E41>3H *74 (70B=>C834=C85843A4?;024<4=CB8C4B
5>AC74=4C;>BB8=A4B834=C80;20?028CH5>A

D=8CB0B0A4BD;C>5?A>942C8<?;4<4=C0C8>= *74;>BB 8=A4B834=C80;20?028CH<DBC148=2;D3430B058=38=6>5B86=85820=240B?0AC>50A4E8B43 ( *74

(3>4B=>C02C8=2>=5>A<0=24F8C7C74
)

)0=3C74;>BCI>=8=620?028CH>50=H
3F4;;8=6D=8CB8B0B86=85820=C4=E8A>=<4=C0;8<?02C8=E8>;0C8>=>5C74 )

) *74

(<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C>C78B8=2>=B8BC4=2H 338C8>=0;;H3454AA8=6C744=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B>52>=BCAD2C8>=0=3>?4A0C8>=>5A4?;024<4=C B8C4BC>0;0C4A30C48B?A>942C?8424<40;8=68=E8>;0C8>=>5 ' *74
(3>4B=>C022DA0C4;H>A
034@D0C4;H 34B2A814 C74 ?A>942C <40=8=6 “C74 F7>;4 >5 0= 02C8>= F7827 70B 0 ?>C4=C80; 5>A A4BD;C8=68=48C74A038A42C?7HB820;270=648=C744=E8A>=<4=C>A0A40B>=01;H5>A4B4401;48=38A42C ?7HB820;270=648=C744=E8A>=<4=CP
'K
*74F7>;4>5C7402C8>=<DBCBC0CDC>A8;H
0=3;460;;H8=2;D34C74834=C85820C8>=>5 A4?;024<4=CB8C4B0=30;;0BB>280C4302C8>=B A4@D8A43C> 8<?;4<4=C34E4;>?<4=C>50C;40BC

A4B834=C80;D=8CB
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(70BA4E8B43*01;4 8B2DBB8>=>5(4;4E0=C)02A0<4=C>" >&>;8284BC>438C8CB
0=0;HB8B>5O"
>&>;82H <4=3<4=C?A>?>B0;B8=E>;E8=6)?74A44G?0=B8>=F78272>=C08= ?A8<406A82D;CDA0;;0=3F8;;=>C140??A>E431HC74"
>85C74A48BBD558284=C0;C4A=0C8E4;0=3
0E08;01;4 5>A0==4G0C8>=F8C78=C744G8BC8=6)?74A4>5 =5;D4=24PC>B8<?;H8=B4AC8=C>C74?A4 4G8BC8=6C4GCC70CC74A48B=>B8C40E08;01;4F8C78=C748CHRB)% *74

(

(70B=>C?A>E8343
0=HBD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C>BD??>ACC742;08<C70CC74A48B=>BD558284=C0;C4A=0C8E4;0=30E08;01;4 5>A0==4G0C8>=F8C78=C744G8BC8=6)?74A4>5 =5;D4=24 38C8=6C74?A8>AC4GCC>270=64C74C4A<
5A><O8CHPC>O8CH)% P3>4B=>C<40=8=65D;;H>ABD1BC0=C80;;HBD??>AC02><?;4C4;H38554A4=C CH?4>50=0;HB8B5A><C748=2>A?>A0C438CHC>B?4285820;;HC744G8BC8=6)% *74?A8>A0=0;HB8B F0B=>C01>DCC748CH)% 0=3C74A45>A4B8<?;H270=68=6C74BD1942C5A><O8CHPC>O8CH)% P 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0= 022DA0C4 0=0;HB8B *74

(

( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H <40=8=65D; >A
BD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C>BD??>AC0;4BBC70=B86=85820=C58=38=60=3058=38=6>5B86=85820=24<DBC 14?A>E83438=0A4E8B43
(
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 10 ends

!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(A454ABC>C74(4B?>=B4C>><<4=C
4A4C74

(28C4BC7A444G0<?;4B>520B4
;0FA4;0C43C>C74018;8CH>50=
(C>4G2;D3404E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C5A><?D1;82A4E84F0B 9DBC85820C8>= 5>A4G2;D38=6C74&+ )274<0C82 &;0=&+ D834;8=4B*4=C0C8E4#0BC4A&0A24;
#0?4E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C
8=0=24&;0=0=3&A>?4ACH*0G
G270=646A44<4=C5A><?D1;82
A4E84F5>AC74?A>?>B43?A>942C *74

(4G2;D34BC70CC742>DACRB3428B8>=B8=C74B420B4BF4A4 10B43>=C74?;08=C855=>C034@D0C4;H34<>=BCA0C8=6C70CC748A4G2;DB8>=O?A42;D34B<40=8=65D; 3428B8>=<0:8=6>A?D1;822><<4=CP
0BC)02A0<4=C>&0AC=4AB78?5>A0"8E01;48CHE 8CH>5 )02A0<4=C>

*74?A>?>B43?A>942CRB&+)274<0C82&;0=&+
D834;8=4B0=3*4=C0C8E4
#0BC4A&0A24;#0?0A40;;=424BB0AH5>A<40=8=65D;3428B8>=<0:8=60=3?D1;822><<4=C0BBC0C43 C7A>D67>DCC78B;4CC4A>DA?A4E8>DB;4CC4A><<4=C"4CC4A 8=C74

8=0=24 &;0= 0=3 &A>?4ACH *0G
G270=64 6A44<4=C C> 0B24AC08= C74 ?A>942CRB ?>C4=C80;;H B86=85820=C8<?02CB A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34C742><?;4C4&+)274<0C82&;0= &+
D834;8=4B *4=C0C8E4 #0BC4A &0A24; #0? 4E4;>?<4=C 6A44<4=C 8=0=24 &;0= 0=3
&A>?4ACH*0G
G270=646A44<4=C0B0CC027<4=CB5>AA4E84F0=0;HB8B0=32><<4=C1HC74?D1;82 0=33428B8>=<0:4AB8=>A34AC>2><?;HF8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A034@D0C48=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB0=3<40=8=65D;38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3&(

1
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(BC0C4BC70COC744=C8A4?A>?>B435D4;8=6BC0C8>=
20AF0B7F>D;3142><?A8B43>5

B5F8C7C740BB>280C432>=E4=84=24BC>A4148=6>=;H0 >5C70CB@D0A45>>C064 P608=C74

(28A2D<E4=CB02><?;4C40=0;HB8BF8C70??;8201;48CH A4@D8A4<4=CBF78278=C78B20B48B )02A0<4=C> #D=828?0; >34 )42C8>=

I>=4N&4A<8CC43 DB4B C70C ;8<8CB A4C08;
BC>A4BC>

B@D0A4544C8=B8I4 *74

(

(A45DB4BC>BC0C4C74C>C0;B@D0A45>>C064>5C74
?A>?>B43A4C08;BC>A4 *78B3>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7
'RB10B82C4=4CB>5?D1;8238B2;>BDA40=3
034@D0C48=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB *74

(

(70B=>C?A>E83430=HBD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C>
BD??>AC 0 ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 $>C01;H 86DA4 8A?>AC )>DC7 =3DBCA80; &0A: M
&A4;8<8=0AH)8C4&;0=BC0C4BC70CC745D4;8=6BC0C8>=
20AF0B70=3A4C08;BC>A4F8;;70E401D8;38=6
0A40 >5
B@D0A4 544C *74
(<DBC 14 A4E8B43C>8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=240BC74 ?A>?>B43?A>942C3>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7C74)02A0<4=C>#D=828?0;>34 !-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(3>4B=>C034@D0C4;H033A4BBC742><<4=C
'
D834;8=4B)42C8>=

4BC0C4B
A460A38=60=0;HB8B>5
A>FC7 =3D28=6 <?02CB
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 11 ends

O8B2DBBC74F0HB8=F7827C74?A>?>B43?A>942C2>D;35>BC4A42>=><82>A?>?D;0C8>=6A>FC7>A C74 2>=BCAD2C8>= >5 0338C8>=0; 7>DB8=6 48C74A 38A42C;H >A 8=38A42C;H 8= C74 BDAA>D=38=6 4=E8A>=<4=CL;B>38B2DBBC74270A02C4A8BC82>5B><4?A>942CBF7827<0H4=2>DA0640=35028;8C0C4 >C74A 02C8E8C84B C70C 2>D;3 B86=85820=C;H 05542C C74 4=E8A>=<4=C 48C74A 8=38E83D0;;H >A 2D<D;0C8E4;H P
*74
(2;08<BC70CO1420DB4>5C748=3DBCA80;0=32><<4A280;=0CDA4>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942C 1D8;3>DC F>D;3 =>C 38A42C;H A4BD;C 8= 0= 8=2A40B4 8= ?>?D;0C8>= >A 2>=BCAD2C8>= >5 7>DB8=6 P >F4E4AC74
(4G2;D34BC70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942C8B>DCB834>5C748CHRB)% <40=8=6C70C8C F8;;A4?A4B4=C0<0A:438=2A40B401>E44G8BC8=66A>FC7?A>942C8>=B C8B2;40AC70CC74?A>?>B43 ?A>942C70B=>C?A4E8>DB;H144=?;0==435>A34E4;>?<4=C0B8C8B>DCB834C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>RB )?74A4>5 =5;D4=240A40 338C8>=0;;H
86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

#*&
))
834=C8584BC74 ?A>942C B8C4 0B O"0=3 $>C 34=C85843 5>A 4E4;>?<4=C8=C74 #*& )) &;0==8=6
&4A8>3P<40=8=6C70C8CF0B=>C8=2;D3438=0=H6A>FC75>A420BC8=60=3C74#*& ))834=C8584B

6A>FC78=C74B40A40B )86=85820=C8<?02CBF8;;A4BD;C5A><34E4;>?<4=C>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942C 8=2;D38=6 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 2D<D;0C8E4;H 2>=B834A01;4 8<?02CB C> 4BC74C82B 6A82D;CDA0;(4B>DA24B8A'D0;8CH0=3
A44=7>DB4
0B
<8BB8>=B )8=24C74?A>942CB8C4F0B
=>C8=2;D3435>A0=0;HB8B0B0=4<?;>H<4=C64=4A0C8=6DB41HC748CH>D=CH>A)% 8C8B
A4?A4B4=CB0=8=2A40B48=?>?D;0C8>=0=34<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7C70CF0B=>C022>D=C435>A1H0=H 064=2H *74
(70B=>C?A>E8343BD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C>BD??>AC0;4BBC70=B86=85820=C58=38=6 0=3<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C>C78BB86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;4 8<?02C
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

( 3>4B =>C 034@D0C4;H 033A4BBC74 2><<4=C *74

( 2>=C8=D4BC> 0BB4ACC74 B0<4
0A6D<4=C8=C74
(C70COC74?A>942C’B2>=CA81DC8>=C>C74>E4A0;;?>?D;0C8>=8=2A40B41H

F>D;3>=;H140??A>G8<0C4;H ?4A24=C P*78B3>4B=>C022>D=C5>AC74502CC70CC74?A>942CB8C4 8B=>CF8C78=C748=2>A?>A0C438CH;8<8CB>AC748CHRB)?74A4>5 =5;D4=240=3C74A45>A4F0B=>C 022>D=C435>AF8C78=C74

A4B834=CC>C0;0=3C74A45>A4A4?A4B4=CB0=8=2A40B4>5

=4F
A4B834=CB 01>E4 C74

?A>942C8>= *74

(

( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H A4;4E0=C 0=0;HB8B
A460A38=6C748CHRB4<?;>H<4=C?A>942C8>=B )8=24C74?A>942CB8C4F0B=>C8=2;D3435>A0=0;HB8B 0B0=4<?;>H<4=C64=4A0C8=6DB41HC748CH>D=CH>A)% 8C8BA4?A4B4=CB0=8=2A40B48=
?>?D;0C8>=0=34<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7C70CF0B=>C022>D=C435>A1H0=H064=2H *74 (<DBC14
A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C>C78BB86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;48<?02C )02A0<4=C>>D=28; >5
>E4A=<4=CB )%
03>?C43C74

#4CA>?>;8C0= *A0=B?>AC0C8>=
&;0=
)DBC08=01;4 ><<D=8C84B )CA0C46H #*&
)) >= $>E4<14A

86DA4
><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

#*&
))834=C8584BC74?A>942CB8C40BO"0=3$>C 34=C85843 5>A 4E4;>?<4=C 8=C74 #*&
)) &;0==8=6 &4A8>3P <40=8=6 C70C 8C F0B =>C 8=2;D3438= 0=H

&&#%
'''%"
"$
%
&%
!
%
&&
!&% &#%%#

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 12 ends

6A>FC75>A420BC8=60=3C74#*&
))834=C8584B
6A>FC78=C74B40A40B *74#*&
))=>C4BC70C
C74
BC01;8B743><<D=8C84B8=C74)%
A468>=F8;;033

9>1B14CF44=

86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4B0=3*01;4
)D<<0AH >5
G?42C43>DB8=60=3
<?;>H<4=C

A>FC71H><<D=8CH*H?4 +C8;8I8=6C74
(RB20;2D;0C8>=>5

4<?;>H44BC74?A>942C
A4?A4B4=CB0
8=2A40B401>E4C744<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7?A>942C8>=B5A><

F8C78=0;;
>5 )%
RB
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B B8=6;4 ?A>942C 022>D=C8=6 5>A C78B 0<>D=C >5 C74 ?A>942C434<?;>H<4=C0=3
>A?>?D;0C8>=>E4A
H40ABA4?A4B4=CB0B86=85820=C0<>D=C>56A>FC7
A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34C78B0=0;HB8B0=30;B>?A>E83402D<D;0C8E40=0;HB8B 38B2DBB8>= >5 ?A>942CB 0??A>E43 B8=24

0=3 ?A>942CB O8= C74 ?8?4;8=4P F8C78=
BC01;8B743
><<D=8C84B8=C74)%
A468>=C>34C4A<8=485C74?A>942CF8;;4G2443)%
RB4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC75>A420BC5>AC74
BC01;8B743><<D=8C84B 338C8>=0;;HC74A4E8B43
(<DBC0;B>?A>E834
34<>6A0?7820=364>6A0?7828=5>A<0C8>=>=C74;>20C8>=>5@D0;85843F>A:4ABC>58;;C74B4?>B8C8>=B 8=>A34AC>?A>E8340=022DA0C44=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B !-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(A454ABC>(4B?>=B4C>><<4=C

F7827BC0C4BC70CO34C4A<8=0C8>=>5
4=4A0;
&;0=2>=B8BC4=2H3>4B=>CA4@D8A42>=B8BC4=2HF8C7E8ACD0;;H4E4AH?>;82H8=2;D3438=C74 4=4A0;
&;0=>=;H2><?;80=24F8C7C7>B40??;8201;4?>;8284BC70C0A4A4;0C43C><8C860C8=64=E8A>=<4=C0; 8<?02CB P><<4=C

0BB4ACBC70CC74?A>942C8B38A42C;H8=2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74;8BC43?>;8284B C70C F4A4 03>?C43 5>A C74 ?DA?>B4B >5 0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C *74

(

(70B=>C?A>E8343BD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C70CC74?A>942C8B2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74B4?>;824B A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=24 !-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

( A454AB C> C74 (4B?>=B4 C> C> ><<4=C
F7827 BC0C4B C70C O>=CA0AH C> C74
2><<4=C4ARB 2;08< C70C C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 3>4B =>C 2><?;H F8C7 &+ )42C8>=

1
)%
?A4?0A43 0= "+ &A4;8<8=0AH (4E84F 0=3 ?A>E8343 2>=38C8>=B >5 0??A>E0; 5>A C74 ?A>942CRB2><?0C818;8CHF8C7C74)02A0<4=C> =C4A=0C8>=0;8A?>ACRB"+& BBD27C74?A>?>B43 ?A>942C70B144=?A>E8B8>=0;;H0??A>E435>A2><?0C818;8CHF8C7C74"+&1HC74)% "+
5C7434B86=>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942C8B=>C2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C742>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;3428343D?>= 1HC74)%
"+C74?A>942CF>D;31434=8430=334E4;>?<4=CF>D;3=>C>22DA P>F4E4A C74)%
"+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;0A4=>C8=2;D343 5>A?D1;82 A4E84FF78273>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7
'RBA4@D8A4<4=CB5>A034@D0C48=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
' K

0=3 &(

1 =2>A?>A0C8>= 1H A454A4=24

'K

58B=>C0??A>?A80C40BC74)%
"+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B
>50??A>E0;2>=CA81DC438A42C;HC>0=0;HB8B>5C74?A>1;4<0C70=3 A4E8B43 (<DBC14?A4?0A43
C>8=2;D34C74)%
"+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;5>AA4E84F0=0;HB8B 0=32><<4=C1HC74?D1;820=33428B8>=<0:4AB8=>A34AC>2><?;HF8C7 'RBA4@D8A4<4=CB
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 13 ends

5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4 ' K

0=3 &(

1 *74

(DC8;8I4B)%
RB0;;4643A4E84F0B9DBC85820C8>=5>A2><?;80=24
F8C7 &+ )42C8>=

1 *74

(

( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H BD1BC0=C80; 4E834=24C>
BD??>ACC742;08<C70CC74?A>942C2><?;84BF8C7&+)42C8>=

1C74"+&&>;8CH"+&

0=3
>A0;4BBC70=B86=85820=C58=38=6B058=38=6>5B86=85820=24<DBC14?A>E83438=0A4E8B43

( ><<4=C4ABA4B4AE4C74A867CC>2>=C8=D4C78B2><<4=C0=30=0;HB8B>=C78BC>?82B7>D;3C74 0;;4643)%
"+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;148=2;D3438=0A4E8B43

(
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(?A>E834B=4F<0C4A80;8=5>A<0C8>=A460A38=6C74>?4A0C8>=B>5C74?A>?>B437>C4;C70C 8B=>C8=2;D3438=C74
( *74
(<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34C78B8=5>A<0C8>= *74

(0BB4ACB
C70COC74?A>?>B437>C4;F>D;3?A8<0A8;H3A0F?0CA>=0645A><C74=40A1H08A?>AC>AC74039024=C 5A44F0H P*74A48B=><8C860C8>=<40BDA4?A>?>B43C>A4@D8A4C70CC747>C4;>=;H14DC8;8I431H 08A?>AC ?0CA>=B >A 5A44F0H ?0BB4A1H *74A40A4 => ,#* 0=0;HB8B 4G4<?C8>=B 5>A 7>C4;B *74 >?4A0C8>=0;=0CDA4>57>C4;B8BC>BD??>ACE8B8C>AB0=3CA0=B84=CBC0HB0=3C7>B4E8B8C>ABF8;;CA0E4; 1H E4782;4 C> D=:=>F= 34BC8=0C8>=B >5 D=:=>F= E4782;4 CA8? ;4=6C7B *74

( 0CC4<?CB C>
270A02C4A8I4C74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4;0B 0 O;>20; B4AE8=6 DB4PC70C 64=4A0C4B 54F0=3B7>AC E4782D;0A CA8?B C8B=>CA40B>=01;4>A540B81;4C>0=0;HI4C74?A>?>B437>C4;C7A>D67C74=0AA>F;4=B>50 >=4F0HE4782D;0ACA8?5A><C7408A?>ACC>C747>C4;1H8CB?0CA>= >8=6B>>=;HB4AE4BC>B:4F 8<?02CB3>F=F0A3B0=3>15DB20C4C7402CD0;,#*64=4A0C431H0;;DB4B?A>?>B431HC74?A>942C 58=38=6>5B86=85820=24<DBC148=2;D3438=0A4E8B43 (0BC744=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B70B=>C
?A>E83430=H <40=8=65D; >A BD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C> BD??>AC0;4BBC70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 0=3 A45DB4BC>?A>E8340@D0=C85843,#*0=0;HB8B5>AC74?A>?>B437>C4; #8C860C8>=#40BDA4

8=C74A05C
(BC0C4BC745>;;>F8=6
O

&A8>AC>C7424AC85820C4>5>22D?0=2H5>A4027>=B8C48=3DBCA80;1D8;38=6C74>F=4A >?4A0C>A
>540271D8;38=6B70;;14A4@D8A43C>?A4?0A40=38<?;4<4=C0,#*(43D2C8>=&;0=C70C8=2;D34B 0BD558284=CB4;42C8>=>5&%*A8?(43D2C8>=&A>6A0<B*C7A>D67* C>A43D24,#*

%0-*362-%-64368
0%22-2+%2(#7)%2(&33/!)'8-32
# ):-);,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(*

%0-*362-%-64368
0%22-2+%2(#7)%2(&33/!)'8-32
# ):-);,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(* Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 14 ends

1H0C;40BC

?4A24=C2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74,#*#8C860C8>=#4<>A0=3D<?A4?0A431HC748CH’B &D1;82->A:B4?0AC<4=C5>AC74?A>?>B43?A>942CB44??4=38G'C>C74 ( &%*A8?
(43D2C8>=&A>6A0<B*C7A>D67*
8=2;D34<40BDA4BBD270B8<?;4<4=C8=602><<DC4CA8? A43D2C8>=?A>6A0<0=3
>A<0A:4C8=6?A>E838=60A834B70A4?A>6A0<8<?;4<4=C8=60BD1B838I43 >A 38B2>D=C43 CA0=B8C ?A>6A0< ?A>E838=6 4=3>5CA8? 182H2;4 5028;8C84B ?A>E838=6 4<?;>H4A B?>=B>A43E0=?>>;?A828=6F>A:?;0247>DB8=60=38<?;4<4=C8=64<?;>H44?0A:8=620B7>DC *74 ,#*(43D2C8>=&;0=B70;;14BD1<8CC43C>C748CH’B4?0AC<4=C>5&D1;82->A:B0=3><<D=8CH 4E4;>?<4=C4?0AC<4=C5>AA4E84F0=30??A>E0; P
*74

(

( 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0=H 0=0;HB8B C70C ?A>?>B43 #8C860C8>= #40BDA4

F8;;
6D0A0=C44A43D243,#*1HC74B?428582DB4AB>5C74?A>942C A4E8B43 (<DBC14?A4?0A43C>
8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=241420DB4C74A48B=>?>BB81;40BBDA0=24>5C74?4A24=C064>5?A>942C 4<?;>H44BC70CF>D;3DC8;8I4=>=0DC><>18;4CA0E4;0BB>280C43F8C78<?;4<4=C0C8>=>5#8C860C8>= #40BDA4

0=3<8C860C8>=>5C74?A>942CRB,#*8<?02CC>;4BBC70=B86=85820=C8B=>C540B81;4 #8C860C8>=#40BDA4

3>4B=>C8=2;D340=HA4@D8A43<>=8C>A8=60=3
>A4=5>A24<4=C1H8CH
BC055 8CHBC0558B>=;HA4@D8A43C>A4E84F0=30??A>E4C74,#*(43D2C8>=&;0= 5C4AC74,#* (43D2C8>=&;0=8B0??A>E431H8CHBC055C74H0A4=>;>=64A8=E>;E438=,#*(43D2C8>=02C8E8C84B >A0BBDA8=6C4=0=C0374A4=24C>C74 ,#*(43D2C8>=&;0= 3DA8=6 >?4A0C8>=B C8B =>C ?>BB81;4 540B81;4>AA4@D8A435>AC748CHC>4=BDA4C70C##

F8;;A4BD;C8=A43D243,#*1H?A>942C
4<?;>H44B0=3148<?;4<4=C432>=C8=D>DB;H0C0;;C8<4BC7A>D67>DCC74;854>5C74?A>942C0=3 <08=C08=0,#* A43D2C8>=C>;4BBC70= B86=85820=C;4E4;B0C0;;C8<4B A4E8B43 (<DBC 14
?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 1420DB4 C74A4 8B => ?>BB81;4 0BBDA0=24 >5 C74 ?4A24=C064>5 ?A>942C4<?;>H44BC70CF>D;3DC8;8I4=>=0DC><>18;4CA0E4;>A A43D24C748A,#* 0BB>280C43 F8C78<?;4<4=C0C8>= >5#8C860C8>= #40BDA4

0=3 <8C860C8>= >5 C74 ?A>942CRB
,#*8<?02CC>;4BBC70=B86=85820=C8B=>C540B81;4
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(BC0C4BC70CO)#'# A4E84F43C74'#&?A4?0A43 5>AC74?A>?>B43 ?A>942C0=3 ?A>E83430;4CC4A>=!D=4

E4A85H8=6C70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942C'#&F8;;C7A>D67>= B8C40=3>55B8C4<40BDA4B02784E40?4A24=CA43D2C8>=8=>I>=4?A42DAB>AB64=4A0C431H<>18;4 B>DA24B >E4AC74 10B4;8=4 2>=38C8>=B 0=C828?0C43 *7DB 0338C8>=0; <8C860C8>= <40BDA4B 0A4 =>C A4@D8A43C>148<?;4<4=C43C>5DAC74AA43D24(%
0=3$%.4<8BB8>=B14H>=3F70C8B?A4B4=C43
8=C74A05C
( P>F4E4AC74)#'#;4CC4AA454A4=24374A48B=>C8=2;D3430B0=0CC027<4=C 5>A?D1;82 A4E84F *78B3>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7
'RBA4@D8A4<4=CB5>A034@D0C48=5>A<0C8>=0;
3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
' K

0=3 &(

1 =2>A?>A0C8>= 1H
A454A4=24
'K

58B=>C0??A>?A80C40BC74)#'#;4CC4A2>=CA81DC4B38A42C;HC> 0=0;HB8B>5C74?A>1;4<0C70=3 *74

(

(?A42;D34B<40=8=65D;3428B8>=<0:8=60=3
>A
?D1;82 2><<4=C 8=8CB 4G2;DB8>= >5C74 )#'# ;4CC4A B8=248C 8B DC8;8I43 0B9DBC85820C8>= C> Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 15 ends

BD??>AC 0 ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 C74 )#'#
;4CC4A 5>A A4E84F 0=0;HB8B 0=3 2><<4=C 1H C74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 8= >A34A C> 2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4 ' K

0=3

1
!-+*)-! .* *((!).

*74 ?A>942C8>=B 5>A 2D<D;0C8E4 0=0;HB8B <DBC 14 @D0=C85843 0=3 38B2;>B43 C> C74 ?D1;82 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B G2;D38=6 0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74
1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB 8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 3>4B =>C 2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
' K

0=3 &(

1 =2>A?>A0C8>= 1H A454A4=24
' K

5 8B =>C 0??A>?A80C4 0B 0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB 8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 2>=CA81DC4 38A42C;H C> 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 ?A>1;4< 0C 70=3 *74

(

( ?A42;D34B <40=8=65D; 3428B8>= <0:8=6 0=3
>A ?D1;82 2><<4=C
8= 8CB 4G2;DB8>= >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= B8=24 8C 8B DC8;8I43 0B
9DBC85820C8>= C> BD??>AC 0 ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34
0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB
8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 5>A A4E84F 0=0;HB8B 0=3 2><<4=C 1H C74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 8= >A34A C> 2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
' K

0=3 &(

1
$>C01;H *01;4

A>FC7 &A>942C8>=B 5>A )02A0<4=C>

4=4A0; &;0=
F8C78= C74
4=4A0;
&;0=
( BC0C4B C70C C74 8CH F8;; 033

9>1B 5A><

*01;4
8CHF834 D8;3>DC
1H >=24?C A40 BC0C4B C70C C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= F8;; 70E4
=3DBCA80;
4<?;>H44B 0C 1D8;3>DC *01;4
8CHF834 D8;3>DC )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H<4=C 8= C74 4=C8A4 8CH F8;; 8=2A40B4 1H
9>1B 0C 1D8;3>DC )8=24 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 8B =>C ;>20C43 F8C78= C74 8=2>A?>A0C43 8CH ;8<8CB >A 8CB )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C C74A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 >5

=4F 4<?;>H44B 01>E4 C74B4 ?A>942C8>=B $>C01;H C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942CRB

4<?;>H44B F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0=C828?0C43 5>A C74 4=C8A4CH >5 C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= 1H

8C F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 8CH 1H 0=3 8=2A40B4 C>C0; 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 28CH 1H
*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CH
4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC B24=0A8>
8=2;D38=6 0;; 2D<D;0C8E4 34E4;>?<4=C 2>=BCAD2C43 B8=24 03>?C8>= 0??A>E43 ?A>942CB =>C H4C 2>=BCAD2C43 0=3 O?A>942CB8= C74 ?8?4;8=4 P A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B
8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B 0=3 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 0B C74 ?A>942C F8;; 8=3D24 6A>FC7 8= C74 0A40 0=3 4G2443B C74 4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC
B24=0A8> 5>A C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43+B4 34B86=0C8>= C70C F0B 34E4;>?43 5>A C74 ?DA?>B4 >5

,8847;;;'-8=3*7%'6%1)283+3:'328)28(%14368%0'(( 0%22-2+2:-6321)28%014%'8
)43687
+49%2('%%4!%'6%1)283

63.)'8

4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 16 ends

0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C A43D24 ,#*

0=3 8<?A>E4 08A @D0;8CH E80
2><?02C <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C
!-+*)-! .* *((!).

*74

( A454AB C>(4B?>=B4 C> ><<4=C

*74

( ?A>E834B =4F <0C4A80; 8=5>A<0C8>=
A460A38=6 C74 >?4A0C8>=B >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4; C70C 8B =>C 8=2;D343 8= C74 ( *74
( <DBC 14
A4E8B43 C> 8=2;D34 C78B 8=5>A<0C8>= *74

( 0BB4ACB C70C OC74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4; F>D;3 ?A8<0A8;H
3A0F ?0CA>=064 5A>< C74 =40A1H 08A?>AC >A C74 039024=C 5A44F0H P *74A4 8B => <8C860C8>= <40BDA4 ?A>?>B43 C> A4@D8A4 C70C C74 7>C4; >=;H 14 DC8;8I43 1H 08A?>AC ?0CA>=B >A 5A44F0H ?0BB4A1H *74A4 0A4 => ,#* 0=0;HB8B 4G4<?C8>=B 5>A 7>C4;B *74 >?4A0C8>=0; =0CDA4 >5 7>C4;B 8B C> BD??>AC E8B8C>AB 0=3 CA0=B84=C BC0HB 0=3 C7>B4 E8B8C>AB F8;; CA0E4; 1H E4782;4 C> D=:=>F= 34BC8=0C8>=B >5 D=:=>F= E4782;4 CA8? ;4=6C7B *74

( 0CC4<?CB C> 270A02C4A8I4 C74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4; 0B 0 O;>20; B4AE8=6 DB4P C70C 64=4A0C4B 54F 0=3 B7>AC E4782D;0A CA8?B C 8B =>C A40B>=01;4 >A 540B81;4 C> 0=0;HI4 C74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4; C7A>D67 C74 =0AA>F ;4=B >5 0 >=4F0H E4782D;0A CA8? 5A>< C74 08A?>AC C> C74 7>C4; 1H 8CB ?0CA>= >8=6 B> >=;H B4AE4B C> B:4F 8<?02CB 3>F=F0A3B 0=3 >15DB20C4 C74 02CD0; ,#* 64=4A0C43 1H 0;; DB4B ?A>?>B43 1H C74 ?A>942C 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 <DBC 14 8=2;D343 8= 0 A4E8B43 ( 0B C74
4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H <40=8=65D; >A BD1BC0=C80; 4E834=24 C> BD??>AC 0 ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 0=3 A45DB4B C> ?A>E834 0 @D0=C85843 ,#* 0=0;HB8B 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4; #8C860C8>= #40BDA4

8= C74 A05C
( BC0C4B C74 5>;;>F8=6
O

&A8>A C> C74 24AC85820C4 >5 >22D?0=2H 5>A 4027 >=B8C4 8=3DBCA80; 1D8;38=6 C74 >F=4A >?4A0C>A
>5 4027 1D8;38=6 B70;; 14 A4@D8A43 C> ?A4?0A4 0=3 8<?;4<4=C 0 ,#* (43D2C8>= &;0= C70C 8=2;D34B 0 BD558284=C B4;42C8>= >5 &% *A8? (43D2C8>= &A>6A0D67 * C> A43D24 ,#*
1H 0C ;40BC

?4A24=C 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 C74 ,#* #8C860C8>= #4<>A0=3D< ?A4?0A43 1H C74 8CH’B &D1;82 ->A:B 4?0AC<4=C 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C B44 ??4=38G ' C> C74 ( &% *A8?
(43D2C8>= &A>6A0D67 *
8=2;D34 <40BDA4B BD27 0B 8<?;4<4=C8=6 0 2><<DC4 CA8?
A43D2C8>= ?A>6A0< 0=3
>A <0A:4C8=6 ?A>E838=6 0 A834B70A4 ?A>6A0< 8<?;4<4=C8=6 0 BD1B838I43 >A 38B2>D=C43 CA0=B8C ?A>6A0< ?A>E838=6 4=3>5CA8? 182H2;4 5028;8C84B ?A>E838=6 4<?;>H4A B?>=B>A43 E0=?>>; ?A828=6 F>A:?;024 7>DB8=6 0=3 8<?;4<4=C8=6 4<?;>H44 ?0A:8=6 20B7>DC *74 ,#* (43D2C8>= &;0= B70;; 14 BD1<8CC43 C> C74 8CH’B 4?0AC<4=C >5 &D1;82 ->A:B 0=3 ><<D=8CH 4E4;>?<4=C 4?0AC<4=C 5>A A4E84F 0=3 0??A>E0; P
*74

(

( 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0=H 0=0;HB8B C70C ?A>?>B43 #8C860C8>= #40BDA4

F8;;
6D0A0=C44 A43D243 ,#* 1H C74 B?428582 DB4AB >5 C74 ?A>942C A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C>
8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 1420DB4 C74A4 8B => ?>BB81;4 0BBDA0=24 >5 C74 ?4A24=C064 >5 ?A>942C 4<?;>H44B C70C F>D;3 DC8;8I4 =>=0DC><>18;4 CA0E4; 0BB>280C43 F8C7 8<?;4<4=C0C8>= >5 #8C860C8>= #40BDA4

0=3 <8C860C8>= >5 C74 ?A>942CRB ,#* 8<?02C C> ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 8B =>C 540B81;4 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 17 ends

#8C860C8>=#40BDA4

F8;;A4BD;C8=A43D243,#*1H?A>942C
4<?;>H44B0=3148<?;4<4=C432>=C8=D>DB;H0C0;;C8<4BC7A>D67>DCC74;854>5C74?A>942C0=3 <08=C08=0,#* A43D2C8>=C>;4BBC70= B86=85820=C;4E4;B0C0;;C8<4B A4E8B43 (<DBC 14
?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 1420DB4 C74A4 8B => ?>BB81;4 0BBDA0=24 >5 C74 ?4A24=C064>5 ?A>942C4<?;>H44BC70CF>D;3DC8;8I4=>=0DC><>18;4CA0E4;>A A43D24C748A,#* 0BB>280C43 F8C78<?;4<4=C0C8>= >5#8C860C8>= #40BDA4

0=3 <8C860C8>= >5 C74 ?A>942CRB
,#*8<?02CC>;4BBC70=B86=85820=C8B=>C540B81;4
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

( A454A4=24B 0;85>A=80 >34 >5 (46D;0C8>=B *8C;4 )42C8>=

C70C A4@D8A4B
0DC><>18;4CA05582142>=B834A435>A,#*0=0;HB8B *8C;4 >5C740;85>A=80>34>5(46D;0C8>=B
3>4B=>C3458=4C74C4A<O0DC><>18;4 P
'BC0CDC40;B>3>4B=>C3458=4C74C4A<O0DC><>18;4 P *74
>E4A=>ARB %55824 >5 &;0==8=6 0=3 (4B40A27 %&(

'
D834;8=4B *427=820;
3E8B>AH0A4?DA4;H03E8B>AH0BBC0C438=8CB8=CA>3D2C8>= O*74?DA?>B4>5C78B3>2D<4=C8BC>?A>E83403E8240=3 A42><<4=30C8>=BF7827064=284B0=3 >C74A4=C8C84B<0HDB40CC748A38B2A4C8>= *78B3>2D<4=C3>4B=>C0;C4A;403064=2H38B2A4C8>=8= ?A4?0A8=64=E8A>=<4=C0;3>2D<4=CBBD1942CC>
' *78B3>2D<4=CB7>D;3=>C142>=BCAD430B
;460;03E824 P
*74%&(

'
D834;8=4B*427=820;3E8B>AH8B=>C0;460;8=C4A?A4C0C8>=2>DAC3428B8>= >A0<4=3<4=CC>C74
'BC0CDC4C70C?A>E834B0BD1BC8CDC4C7A4B7>;3>5B86=85820=24 *74 ,#* 0=0;HB8B A4;84B D?>= C74 %&(

'
D834;8=4B *427=820; 3E8B>AH 0=3 8CB
BC0C4<4=CC70COQE4782;4<8;4BCA0E4;43R A454ABC>C740<>D=C0=338BC0=24>50DC><>18;4CA0E4; 0CCA81DC01;4C>0?A>942CPF74A40DC><>18;4A454ABC>?0BB4=64AE4782;4BB?4285820;;H20AB0=3;867C CAD2:BPF78278BC74%&(

>5&()42C8>=

C>2>=2;D34C70CC74?A>942C
F8;;70E4;4BBC70=B86=85820=C8<?02CB BBC0C4301>E4C74C4A<O0DC><>18;4P8B=>C3458=438= C74
' BC0CDC4 >A 0;85>A=80 >34 >5 (46D;0C8>=B *8C;4 0=3 0??;820C8>= >5 C74 %&(
8=C4A?A4C0C8>=8B B?42D;0C8E4 0=3 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0= 0=0;HB8B>5C74 OF>ABC20B4 B24=0A8>P 5>A 4=E8A>=<4=C0;8<?02CB -834B?A403 ?D1;82 D=34ABC0=38=6 0=3 ?4A24?C8>= 8=3820C4B C70CCAD2:B 8=2;D38=6<438D<
740EH3DCHCAD2:

CA08;4ACA8?B0BB>280C43F8C7C748=3DBCA80;=0CDA4>5F0A47>DB4 >?4A0C8>=B 0A4 0DC><>18;4B A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0;; CAD2:

CA08;4A 0=3
3:)6236>7
**-')3*
0%22-2+%2( )7)%6',")',2-'%0(:-736=32:%09%8-2+"6%274368%8-3214%'87 -2,8847346'%+3:')5%(3'7
$")',2-'%0$(:-736=4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 18 ends

>?4A0C8>=0; 34;8E4AH E0= 02C8E8CH 5>A @D0=C85843 ,#* 0=0;HB8B *74 >?4A0C8>=0; =0CDA4 >5 8=3DBCA80;
F0A47>DB4 DB4B 8=E>;E4B 7867 A0C4B >5 CAD2:

CA08;4A 0=3 34;8E4AH E0= ,#* 3D4 C>
CA0E4;8=65A><;0A64A468>=0;38BCA81DC8>=24=C4ABC>B<0;;4A8=3DBCA80;?0A:B0=3C74=C>C748A58=0; 34;8E4AH 34BC8=0C8>=B %=24 4<?;>H44B 0AA8E4 0C C74 8=3DBCA80; 1D8;38=6B 5>A F>A: C74H F8;; 2>=3D2C C748A 9>1B 1H 3A8E8=6 CAD2:

CA08;4A
34;8E4AH E0=B 02A>BB C74 A468>= 0B ?0AC >5 C74 308;H >?4A0C8>=B0B0F0A47>DB4F7827F8;;3A0BC820;;H8=2A40B4?A>942C64=4A0C43,#* *74?A>942CRB CAD2:

CA08;4A
34;8E4AHE0=02C8E8CH8BD=01;4C>DC8;8I4?D1;82CA0=B8C>A02C8E4CA0=B?>AC0C8>=0=38C8B <8B;4038=6 C> C74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4ABC> 4G2;D34 C78B 02C8E8CH 5A>< ,#* 0=0;HB8B A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>A45;42C0@D0=C85843,#*0=0;HB8BC70C8=2;D34B0;;CAD2:

CA08;4A
0=334;8E4AHE0=02C8E8CHC>034@D0C4;H0=3022DA0C4;H0=0;HI4C74?>C4=C80;;HB86=85820=C?A>942C CA0=B?>AC0C8>=8<?02CB
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(A454ABC>(4B?>=B4C>><<4=C

*74

(?A>E834B=4F<0C4A80;8=5>A<0C8>=
A460A38=6C74>?4A0C8>=B>5C74?A>?>B437>C4;C70C8B=>C8=2;D3438=C74 ( *74
(<DBC14
A4E8B43C>8=2;D34C78B8=5>A<0C8>= *74

(0BB4ACBC70COC74?A>?>B437>C4;F>D;3?A8<0A8;H
3A0F?0CA>=0645A><C74=40A1H08A?>AC>AC74039024=C5A44F0H P*74A48B=><8C860C8>=<40BDA4 ?A>?>B43C>A4@D8A4C70CC747>C4;>=;H14DC8;8I431H08A?>AC?0CA>=B>A5A44F0H?0BB4A1H *74A4 0A4=>,#*0=0;HB8B4G4<?C8>=B5>A7>C4;B *74>?4A0C8>=0;=0CDA4>57>C4;B8BC>BD??>ACE8B8C>AB 0=3CA0=B84=CBC0HB0=3C7>B4E8B8C>ABF8;;CA0E4;1HE4782;4C>D=:=>F=34BC8=0C8>=B>5D=:=>F= E4782;4CA8?;4=6C7B *74

(0CC4<?CBC>270A02C4A8I4C74?A>?>B437>C4;0B0O;>20;B4AE8=6DB4P C70C64=4A0C4B54F0=3B7>ACE4782D;0ACA8?B C8B=>CA40B>=01;4>A540B81;4C>0=0;HI4C74?A>?>B43 7>C4;C7A>D67C74=0AA>F;4=B>50>=4F0HE4782D;0ACA8?5A><C7408A?>ACC>C747>C4;1H8CB?0CA>= >8=6B>>=;HB4AE4BC>B:4F8<?02CB3>F=F0A3B0=3>15DB20C4C7402CD0;,#*64=4A0C431H0;; DB4B?A>?>B431HC74?A>942C 58=38=6>5B86=85820=24<DBC148=2;D3438=0A4E8B43 (0BC74
4=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B70B=>C?A>E83430=H<40=8=65D;>ABD1BC0=C80;4E834=24C>BD??>AC0;4BB C70=B86=85820=C58=38=60=3A45DB4BC>?A>E8340@D0=C85843,#*0=0;HB8B5>AC74?A>?>B437>C4; #8C860C8>=#40BDA4

8=C74A05C
(BC0C4BC745>;;>F8=6
O

Page 19 ends

,#*(43D2C8>=&;0=B70;;14BD1<8CC43C>C748CH’B4?0AC<4=C>5&D1;82->A:B0=3><<D=8CH 4E4;>?<4=C4?0AC<4=C5>AA4E84F0=30??A>E0; P
*74

(

( 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0=H 0=0;HB8B C70C ?A>?>B43 #8C860C8>= #40BDA4

0=3<8C860C8>=>5C74?A>942CRB,#*8<?02CC>;4BBC70=B86=85820=C8B=>C540B81;4 #8C860C8>=#40BDA4

F8;;A4BD;C8=A43D243,#*1H?A>942C
4<?;>H44B0=3148<?;4<4=C432>=C8=D>DB;H0C0;;C8<4BC7A>D67>DCC74;854>5C74?A>942C0=3 <08=C08=0,#* A43D2C8>=C>;4BBC70= B86=85820=C;4E4;B0C0;;C8<4B A4E8B43 (<DBC 14
?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 1420DB4 C74A4 8B => ?>BB81;4 0BBDA0=24 >5 C74 ?4A24=C064>5 ?A>942C4<?;>H44BC70CF>D;3DC8;8I4=>=0DC><>18;4CA0E4;>A A43D24C748A,#* 0BB>280C43 F8C78<?;4<4=C0C8>= >5#8C860C8>= #40BDA4

0=3 <8C860C8>= >5 C74 ?A>942CRB
,#*8<?02CC>;4BBC70=B86=85820=C8B=>C540B81;4
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(02:=>F;4364BC70C8=38E83D0;B8C4B?;0=B0A4O=424BB0AHC>?A>E834C74;4E4;>534C08; =424BB0AH 5>AC740=0;HB8B>5C74?>BB818;8CH>5C74?A>942CC>BD1BC0=C80;;H8=2A40B470I0A3BC>0 64><4CA8234B86=540CDA4A4;0C43C><0=4DE4A8=60=3@D4D8=6>5740EHE4782;4B P*74(*BC0C4B C70CC78B0=0;HB8BF8;;142>=3D2C4305C4AC742>=2;DB8>=>5?D1;82A4E84F0=3C74 '?A>24BB
0B8COF8;;14BD1942CC>0??A>E0;1HC748CHA460A38=6B0540224BB8=2;D38=6740EHE4782;40=3 0DC><>18;4<0=4DE4A8=60=3 @D4D48=6 ??A>E0; >5 BD27F8;; 14 10B43 >=C740??;8201;48CH BC0=30A3B0=3 6D834;8=4B8= ?;0240CC74C8<4 >5 A4E84F0B F4;;0B8=3DBCAH BC0=30A3B0=3C74 ?0AC82D;0A?A>942C270A02C4A8BC82B (4;4E0=CBC0=30A3B8=2;D348CH3A8E4F0HB?028=60=328A2D;0C8>= BC0=30A3B 420DB4B8C4B?4285820??A>E0;B0A4=>C2DAA4=C;H148=6?A>24BB43B8C4B?428582A4E84F >5BD2734C08;B8B=>CA4@D8A430CC78BC8<4 *74?A>942C34B2A8?C8>=3>4B=>C2>=C08=0=HB?428582B F7827F>D;3?A42;D34<44C8=628A2D;0C8>=BC0=30A3B8=C745DCDA4 P 4;0H8=6 A4E84F >5C74?A>942C8=022>A30=24F8C78CH A4@D8A4<4=CBC>05C4AC742>=2;DB8>=>5 ?D1;82A4E84F0=3C74
'?A>24BB8B?A>942C8<?;4<4=C0C8>=F8C7>DC
'A4E84F0=33>4B
=>C 2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4 0=3 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB
'K

0=3&(

1 *74
(8B0&A>942C
(?DABD0=CC>
'

D834;8=4B)42C8>=

F7827 A4@D8A4B0 34C08;43 B8C4 ?;0= 5>A4027 B8C48= >A34AC>2>=3D2C Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 20 ends

?A>942CB?428582 A4E84F>50;;8<?02CC7A4B7>;3B C8B8<<0C4A80;85C74

(2;08<BC70COB8C4
B?4285820??A>E0;B0A4=>C2DAA4=C;H148=6?A>24BB43P1420DB4C74 (8BA4@D8A43C>?A>E8340
?A>942CB?4285820=0;HB8B0BA4@D8A431H
'
D834;8=4B)42C8>=

A4E8B43
(<DBC14
?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=240BC74

(

(70B=>C?A>E83430=HBD1BC0=C80;
4E834=24C>BD??>AC0;4BBC70=B86=85820=C58=38=6
!-+*)-!.**((!).

*74

(A454ABC>(4B?>=B4BC>><<4=CB

0=3

*74B4A4B?>=B4B3>=>C034@D0C4;H
033A4BBC742><<4=C
'
D834;8=4B)42C8>=

4BC0C4BA460A38=60=0;HB8B>5
A>FC7
=3D28=6 <?02CB
O8B2DBBC74F0HB8=F7827C74?A>?>B43?A>942C2>D;35>BC4A42>=><82>A?>?D;0C8>=6A>FC7>A C74 2>=BCAD2C8>= >5 0338C8>=0; 7>DB8=6 48C74A 38A42C;H >A 8=38A42C;H 8= C74 BDAA>D=38=6 4=E8A>=<4=CL;B>38B2DBBC74270A02C4A8BC82>5B><4?A>942CBF7827<0H4=2>DA0640=35028;8C0C4 >C74A 02C8E8C84B C70C 2>D;3 B86=85820=C;H 05542C C74 4=E8A>=<4=C 48C74A 8=38E83D0;;H >A 2D<D;0C8E4;H P
*74
(2;08<BC70CO1420DB4>5C748=3DBCA80;0=32><<4A280;=0CDA4>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942C 1D8;3>DC F>D;3 =>C 38A42C;H A4BD;C 8= 0= 8=2A40B4 8= ?>?D;0C8>= >A 2>=BCAD2C8>= >5 7>DB8=6 P >F4E4AC74
(4G2;D34BC70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942C8B>DCB834>5C748CHRB)% <40=8=6C70C8C F8;;A4?A4B4=C0<0A:438=2A40B401>E44G8BC8=66A>FC7?A>942C8>=B C8B2;40AC70CC74?A>?>B43 ?A>942C70B=>C?A4E8>DB;H144=?;0==435>A34E4;>?<4=C0B8C8B>DCB834C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>RB )?74A4>5 =5;D4=240A40 338C8>=0;;H
86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

#*&
))
834=C8584BC74 ?A>942C B8C4 0B O"0=3 $>C 34=C85843 5>A 4E4;>?<4=C8=C74 #*& )) &;0==8=6
&4A8>3P<40=8=6C70C8CF0B=>C8=2;D3438=0=H6A>FC75>A420BC8=60=3C74#*& ))834=C8584B

(2>=C8=D4BC>0BB4ACC74B0<40A6D<4=C8=C74
(C70COC74?A>942C’B2>=CA81DC8>=C>
C74>E4A0;;?>?D;0C8>=8=2A40B41H

F>D;3>=;H140??A>G8<0C4;H ?4A24=C P*78B3>4B=>C 022>D=C 5>AC74 502CC70CC74?A>942CB8C48B=>CF8C78=C748=2>A?>A0C438CH;8<8CB >AC748CHRB )?74A4>5 =5;D4=240=3C74A45>A4F0B=>C 022>D=C43 5>AF8C78=C74

A4B834=CC>C0;0=3
C74A45>A4A4?A4B4=CB0=8=2A40B4>5

=4FA4B834=CB01>E4C74

?A>942C8>= *74

(

(
70B =>C?A>E83430=H A4;4E0=C0=0;HB8B A460A38=6C748CHRB4<?;>H<4=C ?A>942C8>=B )8=24C74 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 21 ends

?A>942CB8C4F0B=>C8=2;D3435>A0=0;HB8B0B0=4<?;>H<4=C64=4A0C8=6DB41HC748CH>D=CH >A )%
8C 8B A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 8= ?>?D;0C8>= 0=3 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 C70C F0B =>C 022>D=C435>A1H0=H064=2H *74
(<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C> C78BB86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;48<?02C
)02A0<4=C>>D=28; >5
>E4A=<4=CB )%
03>?C43C74

#4CA>?>;8C0= *A0=B?>AC0C8>=
&;0=
)DBC08=01;4 ><<D=8C84B )CA0C46H #*&
)) >= $>E4<14A

86DA4
><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4B0=3*01;4
)D<<0AH >5
G?42C43>DB8=60=3
<?;>H<4=C

A>FC71H><<D=8CH*H?4 +C8;8I8=6C74
(RB20;2D;0C8>=>5

4<?;>H44BC74?A>942C
A4?A4B4=CB0
8=2A40B401>E4C744<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7?A>942C8>=B5A><

( A454ABC>(4B?>=B4BC>><<4=CB

0=3

*74B4 A4B?>=B4B 3> =>C
034@D0C4;H033A4BBC742><<4=C
'
D834;8=4B)42C8>=

4BC0C4BA460A38=60=0;HB8B
>5
A>FC7 =3D28=6 <?02CB
O8B2DBBC74F0HB8=F7827C74?A>?>B43?A>942C2>D;35>BC4A42>=><82>A?>?D;0C8>=6A>FC7>A C74 2>=BCAD2C8>= >5 0338C8>=0; 7>DB8=6 48C74A 38A42C;H >A 8=38A42C;H 8= C74 BDAA>D=38=6 4=E8A>=<4=CL;B>38B2DBBC74270A02C4A8BC82>5B><4?A>942CBF7827<0H4=2>DA0640=35028;8C0C4 >C74A 02C8E8C84B C70C 2>D;3 B86=85820=C;H 05542C C74 4=E8A>=<4=C 48C74A 8=38E83D0;;H >A 2D<D;0C8E4;H P
*74
(2;08<BC70CO1420DB4>5C748=3DBCA80;0=32><<4A280;=0CDA4>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942C 1D8;3>DC F>D;3 =>C 38A42C;H A4BD;C 8= 0= 8=2A40B4 8= ?>?D;0C8>= >A 2>=BCAD2C8>= >5 7>DB8=6 P >F4E4AC74
(4G2;D34BC70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942C8B>DCB834>5C748CHRB)% <40=8=6C70C8C F8;;A4?A4B4=C0<0A:438=2A40B401>E44G8BC8=66A>FC7?A>942C8>=B C8B2;40AC70CC74?A>?>B43
&&#%
'''%"
"$
%
&%
!
%
&&
!&% &#%%#

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 22 ends

?A>942C70B=>C?A4E8>DB;H144=?;0==435>A34E4;>?<4=C0B8C8B>DCB834C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>RB )?74A4>5 =5;D4=240A40 338C8>=0;;H
86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

#*&
))
834=C8584BC74 ?A>942C B8C4 0B O"0=3 $>C 34=C85843 5>A 4E4;>?<4=C8=C74 #*& )) &;0==8=6
&4A8>3P<40=8=6C70C8CF0B=>C8=2;D3438=0=H6A>FC75>A420BC8=60=3C74#*& ))834=C8584B

(2>=C8=D4BC>0BB4ACC74B0<40A6D<4=C8=C74
(C70COC74?A>942C’B2>=CA81DC8>=C>
C74>E4A0;;?>?D;0C8>=8=2A40B41H

F>D;3>=;H140??A>G8<0C4;H ?4A24=C P*78B3>4B=>C 022>D=C 5>AC74 502CC70CC74?A>942CB8C48B=>CF8C78=C748=2>A?>A0C438CH;8<8CB >AC748CHRB )?74A4>5 =5;D4=240=3C74A45>A4F0B=>C 022>D=C43 5>AF8C78=C74

A4B834=CC>C0;0=3
C74A45>A4A4?A4B4=CB0=8=2A40B4>5

=4FA4B834=CB01>E4C74

?A>942C8>= *74

(

(
70B =>C?A>E83430=H A4;4E0=C0=0;HB8B A460A38=6C748CHRB4<?;>H<4=C ?A>942C8>=B )8=24C74 ?A>942CB8C4F0B=>C8=2;D3435>A0=0;HB8B0B0=4<?;>H<4=C64=4A0C8=6DB41HC748CH>D=CH >A )%
8C 8B A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 8= ?>?D;0C8>= 0=3 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 C70C F0B =>C 022>D=C435>A1H0=H064=2H *74
(<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C> C78BB86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;48<?02C
)02A0<4=C>>D=28; >5
>E4A=<4=CB )%
03>?C43C74

#4CA>?>;8C0= *A0=B?>AC0C8>=
&;0=
)DBC08=01;4 ><<D=8C84B )CA0C46H #*&
)) >= $>E4<14A

86DA4
><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4B0=3*01;4
)D<<0AH >5
G?42C43>DB8=60=3
<?;>H<4=C

A>FC71H><<D=8CH*H?4 +C8;8I8=6C74
(RB20;2D;0C8>=>5

4<?;>H44BC74?A>942C
A4?A4B4=CB0
8=2A40B401>E4C744<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7?A>942C8>=B5A><

0=3 ?A>942CB O8= C74 ?8?4;8=4P F8C78=
BC01;8B743

&&#%
'''%"
"$
%
&%
!
%
&&
!&% &#%%#

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 23 ends

><<D=8C84B 8= C74 )%
A468>= C> 34C4A<8=4 85 C74 ?A>942C F8;; 4G2443 )%
RB 4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7 5>A420BC 5>A C74
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B 338C8>=0;;H C74 A4E8B43
( <DBC 0;B> ?A>E834
34<>6A0?782 0=3 64>6A0?782 8=5>A<0C8>= >= C74 ;>20C8>= >5 @D0;85843 F>A:4AB C> 58;; C74B4 ?>B8C8>=B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B
*74 ?A>942C8>=B 5>A 2D<D;0C8E4 0=0;HB8B <DBC 14 @D0=C85843 0=3 38B2;>B43 C> C74 ?D1;82 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B G2;D38=6 0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74
1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB 8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 3>4B =>C 2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
' K

0=3 &(

1 =2>A?>A0C8>= 1H A454A4=24
' K

5 8B =>C 0??A>?A80C4 0B 0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB 8<?02C C> C7>B4 ?A>942C8>=B 2>=CA81DC4 38A42C;H C> 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 ?A>1;4< 0C 70=3 *74

(

( ?A42;D34B <40=8=65D; 3428B8>= <0:8=6 0=3
>A ?D1;82 2><<4=C
8= 8CB 4G2;DB8>= >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= B8=24 8C 8B DC8;8I43 0B
9DBC85820C8>= C> BD??>AC 0 ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34
0 @D0=C85843 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

0=3 &(

1
$>C01;H *01;4

A>FC7 &A>942C8>=B 5>A )02A0<4=C>

4=4A0; &;0= F8C78= C74
4=4A0;
&;0=
( BC0C4B C70C C74 8CH F8;; 033

9>1B 5A><

=4F 4<?;>H44B 01>E4 C74B4 ?A>942C8>=B $>C01;H C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942CRB

4<?;>H44B F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0=C828?0C43 5>A C74 4=C8A4CH >5 C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= 1H

63.)'8

4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 24 ends

0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C A43D24 ,#*

0=3 8<?A>E4 08A @D0;8CH E80
2><?02C <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C
!-+*)-! .* *((!).

*74

( 28C4B
'
D834;8=4B )42C8>=

5 C70C BC0C4B O*74 0;C4A=0C8E4B B70;; 14 ;8<8C43
C> >=4B C70C F>D;3 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BB4= 0=H >5 C74 B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A>942C %5 C7>B4 0;C4A=0C8E4B C74
( =443 4G0<8=4 8= 34C08; >=;H C74 >=4B C70C C74 ;403 064=2H 34C4A<8=43 2>D;3 540B81;H 0CC08= <>BC >5 C74 10B82 >1942C8E4B >5 C74 ?A>942C P*74 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0=0;HI43 8= C74
( 3> =>C 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BB4= C74 B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C *74 0;C4A=0C8E4 ?A>942CB 0=0;HI43 02784E4 >=;H <8=>A A43D2C8>=B C> B86=85820=C 45542CB F7827 C74 (
270A02C4A8I4B 0B O54F4AP C70= C74 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 8<?02CB 1DC 8<?02CB F>D;3 A4<08= B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 =>=4C74;4BB ;C4A=0C8E4 ?A>942C 8<?02CB A4<08=8=6 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 0A4 =>C OBD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BBP C70= C74 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 8<?02CB >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C *74
(

( 70B =>C 2><?;843 F8C7
'
D834;8=4B )42C8>=

A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0= 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0=0;HB8B C70C 8=2;D34B 0 A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B C70C 2><?;84B F8C7
'
D834;8=4B )42C8>=

8= >A34A C> 5>BC4A 8=5>A<43
3428B8>= <0:8=6 *78B <DBC 8=2;D34 0;C4A=0C8E4B C70C 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BB4= B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A>942C
,*&!. !-,%+.%*)
*74
( 3>4B =>C 8=2;D34 0 5;>>A ?;0= 34C08;43 B8C4 ?;0= >A 0 2>=24?CD0; 6A038=6 ?;0= *74 10B82 2><?>=4=CB >5 0 &;0==8=6 ??;820C8>= 8=2;D34 0 34C08;43 B8C4 ?;0= 5;>>A ?;0= 2>=24?CD0; 6A038=6 ?;0= FA8CC4= =0AA0C8E4 0=3 34C08;43 4;4E0C8>=B *74 B8C4 ?;0= ?A>E8343 8= 86DA4 )8C4 &;0= 70B
144= 438C43 5>A ?D1;82 A4E84F C> A4<>E4 <40=8=65D; 8=5>A<0C8>= 86DA4 4G2;D34B 0;; >5 C74
:4H =>C4B ;464=3 0=3 8<?>AC0=C B8C4 30C0 BD27 0B ?0A:8=6 0=3 B8C4 2>E4A064 $>C01;H 4E4= C7>D67 C74
G42DC8E4 )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C C74
( ?A>E834B 0 ?A>942CB?428582 0=0;HB8B ?DABD0=C C>
'

D834;8=4B )42C8>=

5>A 0;; 0A40B 4G24?C C74 =>=?0AC828?0C8=6 ?0A24;B
86DA4 )8C4 &;0=
3>4B =>C 8=2;D34 0=H DB45D; 8=5>A<0C8>= C70C F>D;3 14 DC8;8I43 5>A 0=0;HB8B BD27 0B C74 ;>20C8>= >5 C74 CAD2:

CA08;4A ;>038=6 3>2:B ?0BB4=64A 20A ?0A:8=6 B?024B 0=3 CAD2:

CA08;4A ?0A:8=6 B?024B ;;
>5 C74B4 10B82 8C4 2>=3D2C 0=H CH?4 >5 0=0;HB8B 0=3 C74 ( 8B 8=034@D0C4 0B 0=
8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=C 0B 8C 8B =>C ?>BB81;4 C> 0B24AC08= 0=H <40=8=65D; 0=0;HB8B 10B43 D?>= C74 8=5>A<0C8>= ?A>E8343
*74A4 0A4 0;B> => 0A278C42CDA0; 1D8;38=6 4;4E0C8>=B ?A>E8343 *74 A4=34A8=6B 8=2;D343 8= 86DA4

C7A>D67
3> =>C ?A>E834 C74 74867C >5 C74 1D8;38=6B ?08=C 2>;>AB >A 1D8;38=6 <0C4A80;B *74
( 70B 0;B> 4G2;D343 0 6A038=6 ?;0= 5A>< ?D1;82 A4E84F *74 ( BC0C4B C70C O??A>G8<0C4;H

2D182 H0A3B >5 B>8; F>D;3 14 8<?>AC43 3DA8=6 6A038=6P H4C C74A4 8B => <4C7>3 5>A C74 ?D1;82 C> E4A85H C78B 2;08< &A>E838=6 C74 6A038=6 ?;0= 0=3 40AC7F>A: @D0=C8CH =>C4B 8B E8C0; 0B C78B 38A42C;H 8=5>A5 =424BB0AH CAD2: 70D;8=6 CA8?B 3D4 C> B>8; 8<?>AC 4G?>AC 3DA8=6 C74
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 25 ends

6A038=6?70B4>52>=BCAD2C8>= A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34F7>;;H022DA0C40=3
D=438C4334C08;435;>>A?;0=6A038=6?;0=B8C4?;0=0=3?A>942C=0AA0C8E45>A?D1;82A4E84F

DAC74AC74
(8B8=034@D0C40B8C3>4B=>C?A>E83434C08;438=5>A<0C8>=A460A38=6C74A4@D4BCB 0BB>280C43F8C74027>5C7438B2A4C8>=0AH02C8>=B
>A4G0<?;4C74
(1A845;H;8BCB054F>5C74
A4@D4BCB0BB>280C43F8C7C74#
0=3&+1DC70B4G2;D343C74&+)274<0C82&;0=0=3 &+
D834;8=4B 5A>< ?D1;82 A4E84F *74 ?A>942C 0;B> A4@D8A4B 38B2A4C8>=0AH 0??A>E0; >5 0 *4=C0C8E4#0BC4A&0A24;#0?4E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C
8=0=24&;0=0=3&A>?4ACH*0G
G270=64
6A44<4=C=>=4>5F78270A48=2;D3435>A?D1;82A4E84F0B?0AC>5C74 ( *78B3>4B=>C2><?;H
F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3

1 =2>A?>A0C8>=1HA454A4=24
'K

58B=>C0??A>?A80C4
0B C74 2><?;4C4 &+ )274<0C82 &;0= &+
D834;8=4B *4=C0C8E4 #0BC4A &0A24; #0?
4E4;>?<4=C 6A44<4=C
8=0=24 &;0= 0=3 &A>?4ACH *0G
G270=64 6A44<4=C 2>=CA81DC4
38A42C;HC>0=0;HB8B>5C74?A>1;4<0C70=3 A4E8B43 (<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34C742><?;4C4
&+)274<0C82&;0=&+
D834;8=4B*4=C0C8E4#0BC4A&0A24;#0?4E4;>?<4=C6A44<4=C

8=0=24&;0=0=3&A>?4ACH*0G
G270=646A44<4=C5>AA4E84F0=0;HB8B0=32><<4=C1HC74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 8= >A34A C> 2><?;H F8C7 'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4
8=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB0=3<40=8=65D;38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3

1

3 , -
)
3 , */-
.!,%
'-
*74
(BC0C4BC70COC74F4BC4A=?>AC8>=>5C74?A>942CB8C48B;>20C43F8C78=)054CH/>=4F7827 8B34B86=0C43“ ==4A*DA=8=6/>=4PC74B>DC724=CA0;?>AC8>=>5C74B8C48B;>20C43F8C78=)054CH />=4 F78278B 34B86=0C43 “%DC4A??A>027
4?0ACDA4/>=4P0=3C7440BC4A= ?>AC8>= >5C74
?A>942CB8C48B;>20C43F8C78=)054CH/>=4F78278B34B86=0C43“*A05582&0CC4A=/>=4PP>5C74 )02A0<4=C> =C4A=0C8>=0; 8A?>AC "+& *74
( 2>=2;D34BC74 ?A>942C F8;; 70E4;4BBC70=
B86=85820=C8<?02CB 1420DB4O0;; 5DCDA4 DB4BF>D;3 14 A4@D8A43C> 2><?;HF8C7C74 2A8C4A80 5>A 2>=38C8>=0; DB4B 0B B7>F= 8= *01;4
>5 C74 "+&C> 4=BDA4 B054CH 2><?0C818;8CH F8C7 C74 )02A0<4=C> =C4A=0C8>=0;8A?>AC P*74
(3>4B=>C?A>E8340=H<40=8=65D;4E834=24C>BD??>AC
0 ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 *74
( 8B <8B;4038=6 C> C74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 1H 4G2;D38=68=5>A<0C8>=A460A38=6C74BC0CDC>A8;HA4@D8A43A4E84F1H)% "+ *74?A>?>B43
?A>942CA4@D8A4B0
4=4A0;&;0=<4=3<4=CC>270=64C74;0=3DB434B86=0C8>=>=C74?A>942CB8C4 &A8>AC>C740<4=3<4=C>50
4=4A0;&;0=C74"+B70;;A4E84FC74?;0=>A38=0=24>AA46D;0C8>= 5>A2>=B8BC4=2HF8C7C74"+&&+)42C8>=

1 -78;4C74&A>942C4B2A8?C8>=>5C74

(BC0C4BC70C)%
"+A4E84F8BA4@D8A438C8B4G2;D3435A><0=0;HB8BF8C78=C78BB42C8>= ,8847;;;7%'3+36+,31)7,3;49&0-7,)((3'91)28

%0-*362-%-64368
0%22-2+%2(#7)%2(&33/!)'8-32
# ):-);,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(* Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 26 ends

*74
(<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=240BC74?A>942C3>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7 &+)42C8>=

1
$>C01;HC74"0=3+B40=3&;0==8=60=0;HB8BBC0C4BC70CO>=!D;H

)%
?A4?0A430=
"+ &A4;8<8=0AH (4E84F C> 34C4A<8=4 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C’B 2><?0C818;8CH F8C7 C74 )#
"+&P 0=3 )%
?A>E8343 2>=38C8>=B >5 0??A>E0; >F4E4A C74 )% "+
&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;0A4=>C8=2;D3435>A?D1;82A4E84FF78273>4B=>C 2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3

1 =2>A?>A0C8>=1HA454A4=24
'K

58B=>C
0??A>?A80C4 0B C74 )%
"+ &A4;8<8=0AH (4E84F 0=3 2>=38C8>=B >5 0??A>E0; 2>=CA81DC4 38A42C;HC>0=0;HB8B>5C74?A>1;4<0C70=3 A4E8B43 (<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34C74)%

"+&A4;8<8=0AH(4E84F0=32>=38C8>=B>50??A>E0;5>AA4E84F0=0;HB8B0=32><<4=C1HC74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 8= >A34A C> 2><?;H F8C7 'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4
8=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB0=3<40=8=65D;38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3

1

)
-!
) '
))%)#*+/'
.%*)
) */-%)#
C<DBC58ABC14=>C43C70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942C8B=>C2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74?A>?>B43 4=4A0;&;0=
;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>= >5
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 *74 8CHRB
4=4A0; &;0= BC0C4B C70C C74

<?;>H<4=C#8G43+B4 34B86=0C8>= 8B8=C4=343C> 1D554A A4B834=C80; DB4B 5A>< <>A48=C4=B4

0=3

02C8E8C84B 0=3C> ?A>E834 2><?0C81;4 4<?;>H<4=C DB4B =40A 78674A34=B8CH0=3<8G43DB47>DB8=6 *78B34B86=0C8>=?A>E834B 5>A0A0=64>5

0=3

DB4B P*748=3DBCA80;?>AC8>=>5C74?A>942C8B4G2;DB8E4;HF0A47>DB8=60=3 38BCA81DC8>=F78278B0=8=C4=B4B46<4=C>5C741A>03;867C8=3DBCA80;20C46>AHC70C8=E>;E4B7867 A0C4B>5CAD2:CA8?B *74?A>942C8B2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74 =3DBCA80;#8G43+B434B86=0C8>=F7827 O?A>E834B 5>A <0=D502CDA8=6 F0A47>DB8=6 0=3 >C74A 4<?;>H<4=C64=4A0C8=6 DB4B C70C <0H ?A>3D24 ;>D3 =>8B4 >A >3>AB 0=3C4=3 C> 70E4 0 7867 E>;D<4 >5 CAD2: CA05582 P >F4E4A C74 =3DBCA80; #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= OB7>D;3 =>C 14 ;>20C43 =4GC C> 0 A4B834=C80; =48671>A7>>3 F8C7>DCBD1BC0=C80;1D554AB8 4 >55824DB4BA468>=0;?0A:B6A44=F0HB>A>?4=B?024P<40=8=6 C70C8CB7>D;3=>C140??;843C>C74?A>942CB8C44E4=C7>D678C8BC740??A>?A80C4;0=3DB434B86=0C8>= 5>AC74?A>?>B43F0A47>DB8=60=338BCA81DC8>=0B?42C>5C74?A>942C *74 (<DBC14A4E8B43C>
8=2;D34C78B8=5>A<0C8>=5>A0=0;HB8B0=38=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=240BC74?A>?>B43?A>942C 8B=>C2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74
<?;>H<4=C#8G43+B434B86=0C8>=
*74?A>942C5024BB86=85820=C8=2>=B8BC4=284BF8C7BC0CDC>AHA4@D8A4<4=CB>5C74>DB8=6A8B8B2C >5

)4=0C4 8;; )

) *74
)

) A4@D8A4 A4?;024<4=C
397-2+6-7-7'83*!
,88470)+-2*30)+-70%896)'%+3:*%')7&-00")<80-)28<,810&-00$-(! !,88470)+-2*30)+-70%896)'%+3:*%')7&-00")<80-)28<,810&-00$-(! Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 27 ends

7>DB8=6 B8C4B F74= ;0=3 34B86=0C43 5>A 7>DB8=6 34E4;>?<4=C 4G?4A84=24 ;0=3 DB4 270=64B C> 4=BDA4=>=4C;>BB>57>DB8=620?028CH *74
(BC0C4BC70CO10B43>=C744G8BC8=6)02A0<4=C>
>D=CH
4=4A0;&;0=;0=3DB40=3I>=8=634B86=0C8>=B5>AC74?A>942CB8C4A4B834=C80;34E4;>?<4=C F0B=>C0=C828?0C430CC74?A>942CB8C4 P>F4E4AC78BBC0C4<4=C8B4AA>=4>DB0=3<8B;4038=6C> C74?D1;820=33428B8>=<0:4AB0=3<DBC14A4?;0243F8C7502CD0;8=5>A<0C8>=0B?0AC>50A4E8B43

( *74 ?A>942C B8C4 70B 0= 4G8BC8=6 )02A0<4=C> >D=CH "0=3 +B4 ;4<4=C 34B86=0C8>= >5
6A82D;CDA0;A>?;0=3 F7827O0;;>FBB8=6;450<8;H3F4;;8=6D=8CB0C034=B8CH=>6A40C4AC70=
02A4B?4AD=8C P*74A45>A4C74 02A4?A>942CB8C470B0=4G8BC8=6A4B834=C80;34E4;>?<4=C 20?028CH>5

3F4;;8=6D=8CB

>E4A=<4=C>34)42C8>=

78
BC0C4BC70COC78BB42C8>=3>4B=>C?A>7818C0=05542C43 2>D=CH>A0=05542C4328CH8=2;D38=6C74;>20;4;42C>A0C402C8=6C7A>D67C748=8C80C8E4?A>24BB5A>< 270=68=6 0 ;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>= >A I>=8=6 >A38=0=24 C> 0 ;4BB 8=C4=B8E4 DB4 >A A43D28=6 C74 8=C4=B8CH >5 ;0=3 DB4 85 C74 28CH >A 2>D=CH 2>=2DAA4=C;H 270=64B C74 34E4;>?<4=C BC0=30A3B ?>;8284B0=32>=38C8>=B0??;8201;4C>>C74A?0A24;BF8C78=C749DA8B382C8>=C>4=BDA4C70CC74A48B=> =4C;>BB8=A4B834=C80;20?028CH PB20;2D;0C4301>E4C74?A>942CB8C4RB)02A0<4=C>>D=CH"0=3 +B4
;4<4=C 34B86=0C8>= >5 6A82D;CDA0; A>?;0=3 ?A>E834B 34E4;>?<4=C 20?028CH 5>A

A4B834=C80; D=8CB 3>?C8>= >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 )% <4=3<4=C 4=4A0; &;0= <4=3<4=C 0=3
&A4I>=8=6 0B ?0AC >5C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F8;; A4BD;C 8= 0 A43D2C8>= >5 C74 4G8BC8=6 A4B834=C80; 34E4;>?<4=C20?028CH1H

D=8CBC>0342A40B4334E4;>?<4=C20?028CH>5
A4B834=C80;D=8CB
*78B8B8=2>=5;82CF8C7)C70C4G?0=343C74?A>E8B8>=B>5C74C>8=2;D34 >E4A=<4=C>34
)42C8>=

78
A4@D8A8=62>=2DAA4=C0??A>E0;>5A4?;024<4=CB8C4BC>4=BDA4=>=4C;>BB8= A4B834=C80;20?028CH0=3)42C8>=

7
3458=8=6“2>=2DAA4=C;HPC><40=C7402C8>=8B
0??A>E430CC74B0<4<44C8=6>5C74;468B;0C8E41>3H *74 (70B=>C834=C85843A4?;024<4=CB8C4B
5>AC74=4C;>BB8=A4B834=C80;20?028CH5>A

D=8CB0B0A4BD;C>5?A>942C8<?;4<4=C0C8>= *74;>BB ,884740%22-2+7%''3928=+3:3'91)287%2(#7)0)1)281)2()( 4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 28 ends

8=A4B834=C80;20?028CH<DBC148=2;D3430B058=38=6>5B86=85820=240B?0AC>50A4E8B43 ( *74

(3>4B=>C02C8=2>=5>A<0=24F8C7C74
)

)0=3C74;>BCI>=8=620?028CH>50=H
3F4;;8=6D=8CB8B0B86=85820=C4=E8A>=<4=C0;8<?02C8=E8>;0C8>=>5C74 )

) *74

A4B834=C80;D=8CB
*01;4 8B2DBB8>= >5 (4;4E0=C )02A0<4=C> "
> &>;8284B ?A>E834B 4AA>=4>DB 0=3
<8B;4038=62>=B8BC4=2H0=0;HB8B
>A4G0<?;4C74
(2>=2;D34BC74?A>942C8B2>=B8BC4=CF8C7
O"
> &>;82H <4=3<4=C ?A>?>B0;B 8=E>;E8=6 )?74A4 4G?0=B8>= F7827 2>=C08= ?A8<4 06A82D;CDA0;;0=3F8;;=>C140??A>E431HC74"
>85C74A48BBD558284=C0;C4A=0C8E4;0=30E08;01;4
5>A 0==4G0C8>= F8C78= C74 4G8BC8=6 )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24P 1H 28C8=6 0=0;HB8B C70C O0= 0;C4A=0C4 ;>20C8>=F8C78=C748CH8B=>C2DAA4=C;H0E08;01;4C>B4AE4C74?A>?>B43?A>942CP0=3O1D8;3>DC>5 C74B8C4>=0;C4A=0C8E4;0=3>DCB8341DC039024=CC>C748CH’B)% F>D;3;8:4;HA4BD;C8=B8<8;0A 2>=E4AB8>=>5
0A<;0=30BC74?A>?>B43?A>942C68E4=C74?A4E0;4=24>506A82D;CDA0;;0=3039024=C C>C748CH’B)% P*74
(38B2DBB4B;0=3>DCB834C74)% 0=3;0=3F8C78=C748=2>A?>A0C438CH ;8<8CB *74
(70B=>C?A>E83430=H0=0;HB8B>5C748BBD4834=C858438=&>;82H F7827A460A3B 0;C4A=0C8E4;0=3F8C78=C744G8BC8=6)?74A4>5 =5;D4=24 *74 (<DBC14 A4E8B43C>8=2;D340
58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 0B 8C 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H <40=8=65D; 4E834=24C> BD??>AC 0;4BB C70= B86=85820=C58=38=6
*74?A>?>B43?A>942CA4@D4BCB0??A>E0;>50&+)274<0C82&;0=0=3&+ D834;8=4B5>AC74
1>C7C74#
0=30A40B *74
(BC0C4BC70COC74&+
D834;8=4B34E4;>?435>AC74?A>942C
B8C48=2;D3434B86=BC0=30A3B5>AB8C434B86=1D8;38=634B86=;0=3B20?8=6B86=0640=3;867C8=6 P >F4E4AC742><?;4C4&+6D834;8=4B0A4=>C8=2;D3435>A?D1;82A4E84FF78273>4B=>C2><?;H F8C7
'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A 034@D0C4 8=5>A<0C8>=0; 3>2D<4=CB 0=3 <40=8=65D; 38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3

1 =2>A?>A0C8>=1HA454A4=24
'K

58B=>C0??A>?A80C4
0BC742><?;4C4&+6D834;8=4B2>=CA81DC438A42C;HC>0=0;HB8B>5C74?A>1;4<0C70=3 A4E8B43

(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34C742><?;4C4&+6D834;8=4B5>AA4E84F0=0;HB8B0=32><<4=C 1HC74?D1;820=33428B8>=<0:4AB8=>A34AC>2><?;HF8C7 'RB A4@D8A4<4=CB 5>A034@D0C4
8=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=CB0=3<40=8=65D;38B2;>BDA4
'K

0=3

1
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 29 ends

*74
(2>=2;D34BC70COC74?A>?>B43?A>942CF>D;3142>=B8BC4=CF8C7C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>

4=4A0;&;0=0=3&;0==8=60=34E4;>?<4=C>34 P>F4E4AC74 (70B=>C?A>E8343
0=H <40=8=65D; 4E834=24C> BD??>ACC78B 2;08<
>A 4G0<?;4C74 ?A>?>B43 2>=E4=84=24 BC>A4
0BB>280C43 F8C7 C74 60B BC0C8>=
20A F0B7 8B

B@D0A4 544C ?4A ??4=38G $ *A05582 <?02C
=0;HB8B F78;4 )02A0<4=C> #D=828?0; >34 )42C8>=

I>=4N&4A<8CC43 DB4B
;8<8CBA4C08;BC>A4BC>

B@D0A4544C8=B8I4 *74
(<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5
B86=85820=240BC74?A>?>B43?A>942C3>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7C74)02A0<4=C>#D=828?0;>34 *74
( BC0C4BC70COC74 34C4A<8=0C8>= >5 B86=85820=248B 10B43 >=F74C74A ?>?D;0C8>= 6A>FC7 0BB>280C43F8C70?A>942C70B144=?A4E8>DB;H?;0==435>A0=3F74C74ABD276A>FC72>D;3A4BD;C 8=8=38A42C8<?02CB 5A><0BB>280C43 34E4;>?<4=C P C8B2;40AC70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942C70B=>C ?A4E8>DB;H144=?;0==43 5>ADA10=34E4;>?<4=C0B8C8B34B86=0C43 5>A6A82D;CDA0;DB4B1HC74 >D=CH>5)02A0<4=C>0=38B>DCB834C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>RB)?74A4>5 =5;D4=240A40 <?02CB F8;; A4BD;C 5A>< 34E4;>?<4=C >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 8=2;D38=6 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 2D<D;0C8E4;H 2>=B834A01;4 8<?02CB C> 4BC74C82B 6A82D;CDA0; (4B>DA24B 8A 'D0;8CH 0=3

A44=7>DB4
0B
<8BB8>=B )8=24C74?A>942CB8C4F0B=>C8=2;D3435>A0=0;HB8B0B0=4<?;>H<4=C 64=4A0C8=6 DB4 1HC748CH>D=CH >A)%
8C8B A4?A4B4=CB 0=8=2A40B48= ?>?D;0C8>= 0=3
4<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7C70CF0B=>C022>D=C435>A1H0=H064=2H *74 (<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34
058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C>C78BB86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;48<?02C *74
( 0;B> DC8;8I4B D=24AC08= ;0=6D064 0=3 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0=H <40=8=65D; 0=0;HB8B >A BD??>AC8=6 4E834=24C> BD1BC0=C80C4 C74 2>=2;DB8>=C70CC74A4 F8;; 14 => B86=85820=C8<?02CBC> ?>?D;0C8>=0=37>DB8=6
>A4G0<?;4C74
(BC0C4BC70CF78;4C74?A>942C2>D;38=38A42C;H0CCA02C A4B834=CBC>C740A405>A4<?;>H<4=C>??>ACD=8C84B=4F4<?;>H44BF>D;3
143A0F=5A><
2DAA4=C A4B834=CB8=C74

P 0=3C74 64>6A0?782 1>D=30A84B >5C74 OBDAA>D=38=6 0A40P0A4D=3458=43 (4;H8=6>=C744=C8A4;01>A5>A24F8C78=0=D=3458=4338BC0=24=>C01;HC74 6A40C4A)%
A468>=C>58;;C74?A>942CRB2>=BCAD2C8>=0=3>?4A0C8>=0;9>1BF8;;8=2A40B4A0C4B>5 ,#*0=34<8BB8>=B3DA8=60;;?70B4B>52>=BCAD2C8>=0=3>?4A0C8>=B0=30= (<DBC14?A4?0A43
C> 022>D=C 5>A ;>=64A F>A:4ACA8? 38BC0=24B *78B D=24AC08=;0=6D064 8B =>C BD??>AC43 1H 0=H 8=5>A<0C8>= BD27 0B C74 2DAA4=C D=4<?;>H<4=C A0C4B 8= C74 8CH >D=CH >A 4E834=24 C70C C74
D=4<?;>H43?>?D;0C8>=8B@D0;858435>A>A8=C4A4BC438=F>A:8=C748=3DBCA80;B42C>A *74 (<DBC
14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=240B8C70B=>C?A>E83430=H<40=8=65D;4E834=24C> BD??>AC0;4BBC70=B86=85820=C58=38=6
*74
( 2>=C8=D4B 1H BC0C8=6 C70C >=B4AE0C8E4;H 4BC8<0C8=6 C70C 0;; ?4A<0=4=C ?>B8C8>=B 0BB>280C43 F8C7 C74 ?A>942C F>D;3 14 58;;43 1H =4F A4B834=CB C> C74

0=3
0BBD<8=6C70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942CF>D;3145D;;H1D8;C>DC0=3>?4A0C8=60C5D;;20?028CH1H

C74?A>942C’B2>=CA81DC8>=C>C74>E4A0;;?>?D;0C8>=8=2A40B41H

F>D;3140??A>G8<0C4;H
?4A24=C

=4FA4B834=CBS

A4B834=CB *7DBC748=2A40B48=9>1BF>D;314

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 30 ends

2><?0A43C>C748CH’B4G8BC8=60=30=C828?0C43?>?D;0C8>=;4E4;B P C<DBC14=>C43C70CC74 ?A>942CB8C48B=>CF8C78=C748=2>A?>A0C438CH;8<8CB>AC748CHRB)?74A4>5 =5;D4=240=3C74A45>A4 F0B=>C022>D=C435>AF8C78=C74

A4B834=CC>C0;0=3C74A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB0=8=2A40B4>5

=4FA4B834=CB01>E4C74

?A>942C8>= *74
(70B=>C?A>E83430=HA4;4E0=C0=0;HB8B
A460A38=6C748CHRB4<?;>H<4=C?A>942C8>=B )8=24C74?A>942CB8C4F0B=>C8=2;D3435>A0=0;HB8B 0B0=4<?;>H<4=C64=4A0C8=6DB41HC748CH>D=CH>A)% 8C8BA4?A4B4=CB0=8=2A40B48=
?>?D;0C8>=0=34<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7C70CF0B=>C022>D=C435>A1H0=H064=2H *74 (<DBC14
A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C>C78BB86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;48<?02C )02A0<4=C>>D=28; >5
>E4A=<4=CB )%
03>?C43C74

#4CA>?>;8C0= *A0=B?>AC0C8>=
&;0=
)DBC08=01;4 ><<D=8C84B )CA0C46H #*&
)) >= $>E4<14A

86DA4
><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4B0=3*01;4
)D<<0AH >5
G?42C43>DB8=60=3
<?;>H<4=C

A>FC71H><<D=8CH*H?4 +C8;8I8=6C74
(RB20;2D;0C8>=>5

4<?;>H44BC74?A>942C
A4?A4B4=CB0
8=2A40B401>E4C744<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7?A>942C8>=B5A><

4=4A0;&;0=0=3)#
"0=3+B4><?0C818;8CH&;0=&>;82H
8B2DBB8>=3>4B=>C?A>E83402>=B8BC4=2H0=0;HB8BF8C70;;?;0=B?>;8284B>AA46D;0C8>=B03>?C43 5>AC74 ?DA?>B4 >50E>838=6 >A<8C860C8=60=4=E8A>=<4=C0;45542C *74 ?A>942C 70B B86=85820=C ?>C4=C80;C> 2>=5;82C F8C7 <0=H >5C74B48C4 C74 ?A>942C B8C48=2;D38=6 1DC =>C ;8<8C43C>C745>;;>F8=65A><C748CH
4=4A0;&;0=

>0; "+&
2><?02C DA10= 5>>C?A8=C 0=3 BDBC08=01;4 34E4;>?<4=C ?0CC4A= F8C7 8=5A0BCAD2CDA4C70CBD??>ACB4558284=C34;8E4AH>5?D1;82B4AE824BF78;4?A>C42C8=6BDAA>D=38=6 >?4=B?024;0=3B

&&#%
'''%"
"$
%
&%
!
%
&&
!&% &#%%#

Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 31 ends

"+&

><?02C +A10=
>>C?A8=C *748CH B70;; ?A><>C4 0;0=3 0=3 A4B>DA244558284=C 34E4;>?<4=C?0CC4A=0=3C74?;024<4=C>58=5A0BCAD2CDA4C>BD??>AC4558284=C34;8E4AH>5?D1;82 B4AE824B0=32>=B4AE4>?4=B?024A43D24E4782;4<8;4BCA0E4;430=38<?A>E408A@D0;8CH "+&
!>1B>DB8=60;0=24 *748CH B70;;4=2>DA0640 10;0=24 14CF44=9>1CH?4C74 F>A:5>A240=37>DB8=634E4;>?<4=CC>A43D24C74=460C8E48<?02CB>5;>=62><<DC4B0=3 ?A>E8340A0=64>54<?;>H<4=C>??>ACD=8C84B5>A0;;28CHA4B834=CB "+&

>>A38=0C4C>&A>C42C
0A<;0=3 *748CHB70;;2>=C8=D4C>F>A:F8C7)02A0<4=C> >D=CH0=3>C74A039024=C9DA8B382C8>=BC>8<?;4<4=C2>=B4AE0C8>=?;0=B?A4B4AE450A<;0=3 0=3?A>C42C2A8C820;7018C0C>DCB834C7428CH
"+& ><?0C818;8CHF8C739>8=8=6+B4B *748CHB70;;4=BDA4C70CC748=CA>3D2C8>=>5 78674A8=C4=B8CH <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C 0;>=6 <09>A 0AC4A80; 2>AA83>AB 8B 2><?0C81;4 F8C7 039024=C;0=3DB4B?0AC82D;0A;HA4B834=C80;DB4B1HA4@D8A8=6540CDA4BBD270BC745>;;>F8=6 D8;38=6B B4C 102: 5A>< A40A >A B834 H0A3 ?A>?4ACH ;8=4B 039>8=8=6 B8=6;4D=8C 3F4;;8=6 A4B834=C80; DB4B D8;38=6 74867CB BC4??43 102: 5A>< B4=B8C8E4 039>8=8=6 DB4B C> <08=C08= 0??A>?A80C4 CA0=B8C8>=B 8= B20;4 0=3 C> <8=8<8I4 8<?02CB C> ?A8E02H 0=3 B>;0A 0224BB "0=3B20?43>55BCA44C?0A:8=60A40B;>038=60A40B0=3B4AE8240A40BB2A44=435A><039024=C A4B834=C80;0A40BC>C74346A44540B81;4>A"867C8=6B784;3435A><E84F0=338A42C433>F=F0A3 C><8=8<8I48<?02CB>=039024=CA4B834=C80;DB4B
"+& D8;38=6BC70C
=6064C74)CA44C *748CHB70;;A4@D8A4C70C1D8;38=6B14>A84=C43C> 02C8E4;H4=60640=34=70=24C74?D1;82A40;<C7A>D67C427=8@D4BBD270B1D8;38=6>A84=C0C8>= 1D8;3C> 0=3 B4C102: ;8=4B 50J034 0AC82D;0C8>= 6A>D=35;>>A CA0=B?0A4=2H 0=3 ;>20C8>= >5 ?0A:8=6
"+&
=70=243&434BCA80=
=E8A>=<4=C *748CHB70;;A4@D8A4C7434B86=>5B834F0;:B8= 2><<4A280;0=3<8G43DB40A40BC>?A><>C4F0;:018;8CH0=3?434BCA80=02C8E8CHF8C7F83C7B F8344=>D67C>?A>E8345>A5A440=32;40A?434BCA80=DB402C8E0C8>=>51D8;38=65A>=C064BF8C7 38B?;0HB;0=3B20?8=60=3B40C8=60A40B5>A2054B0=3A4BC0DA0=CB "+&

)70A43 &0A:8=6 A8E4F0HB 0=3 ;;4H 224BB *74 8CH B70;; 4=2>DA064 C74 2A40C8>= >5 B70A43 ?0A:8=6 0A40B 0=3 B70A43 E4782D;0A 3A8E4F0HB 5>A 0224BB 0;>=6 0AC4A80; 2>AA83>ABC><8=8<8I4C74=D<14A>53A8E4F0HB0=32DA12DCB *748CHB7>D;30;B>4=2>DA064 C74DB4>5039024=C0;;4HB5>AE4782D;0A0224BB
"+&

A8E4*7A>D67(4BC0DA0=CB *748CHB70;;?A>7818C=4F3A8E4C7A>D67A4BC0DA0=CB F8C78=V<8;4F0;:8=638BC0=245A><C7424=C4A>50=4G8BC8=6;867CA08;BC0C8>=?;0C5>A<>A 78675A4@D4=2HCA0=B8CBC>?0=3W<8;4F0;:8=638BC0=245A><C7424=C4A>50?A>?>B43;867C A08;BC0C8>=

"+&

DCDA4(403H
0B)C0C8>=B *748CHB70;;?A>7818CC744BC01;8B7<4=C>5=4F60B BC0C8>=B>AC744G?0=B8>=>5=4F5>BB8;5D4;8=5A0BCAD2CDA40C4G8BC8=660BBC0C8>=BD=;4BBC74 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 32 ends

?A>942C ?A>?>=4=C ?A>E834B
:- >A 6A40C4A 8A42C DAA4=C
0BC70A64A
4;42CA82
E4782;4270A68=6BC0C8>=B>=B8C40C0A0C8>>50C;40BC =4F270A68=6BC0C8>=?4A
=4F60B5D4;
=>II;4

>0; "+& =3DBCA80; >??>ACD=8C84B 8= BD8C01;4 ;>20C8>=B C> ?A>E834 4<?;>H<4=C 5>A )02A0<4=C>A4B834=CB0=3?A><>C48=2;DB8E442>=><826A>FC78=C7428CH

"+& 4E4;>?<4=C39024=CC>
A44F0HB0=3(08;A>03>AA83>AB *748CHB70;;?A><>C4 7867@D0;8CH 34B86= >5 1D8;38=6B0;>=6 5A44F0H0=3 A08;F0H2>AA83>AB8=2;D38=6 ?A><>C8=6 C427=8@D4BBD270BC745>;;>F8=6(4@D8A8=64GC4=B8E4;0=3B20?8=60=3CA44B0;>=6C745A44F0H 5A>=C8=64;4E0C8>=8=2>=BD;C0C8>=F8C78CHBC055C74)02A0<4=C>#4CA>?>;8C0=8A'D0;8CH #0=064<4=C8BCA82C0=30;CA0=B
BC01;8B78=602>=B8BC4=C1D8;38=6;8=40AC82D;0C8=60=3 <>3D;0C8=6 1D8;38=6 4;4E0C8>=B 0=3 74867CB 0=3 E0AH8=6C74 DB4 >5 <0C4A80;B 0=3 2>;>AC> 2A40C4E8BD0;8=C4A4BC0=3 =2;D38=634B86=4;4<4=CBC70CA43D24=>8B40=3?A>E8345>A58;C4A8=6 E4=C8;0C8>=0=34G70DBC>5E4782;408A4<8BB8>=B

"+& &4>?;4
A84=3;H 4B86= *74 8CH B70;; A4@D8A4 ?4>?;45A84=3;H 34B86= C> 14 8=2>A?>A0C438=C>1D8;38=6B0=3B?024B8=2;D38=64;4<4=CB0=3540CDA4BBD270BC745>;;>F8=6 D<0=B20;4CA44B70343?434BCA80=?0BB064F0HB(4BC8=60A40B)40C8=6 0C74A8=6?;024B
0=3%C74A<40BDA4BF8C734<>=BCA0C4314=458CB5>A740;C70=3@D0;8CH>5;854

"+&

(4B?>=B8E4=4BBC>>=C4GC *748CH B70;; A4@D8A4 1D8;38=6 0=3 B8C4 34B86=C70C A4B?42CB0=3A4B?>=3BC>C74;>20;2>=C4GC8=2;D38=6DB4>5;>20;<0C4A80;B0=3?;0=CB?4284B F74A4 540B81;4 A4B?>=B8E4=4BB C> )02A0<4=C>’B 2;8<0C4 0=3 2>=B834A0C8>= >5 2D;CDA0; 0=3 78BC>A822>=C4GC>5)02A0<4=C>’B=48671>A7>>3B2>AA83>AB0=324=C4AB

"+&

$48671>A7>>30=3*A0=B8C8>=B *748CHB70;;4=BDA4C70C34E4;>?<4=CBC0=30A3B 5028;8C0C4CA0=B8C8>=B14CF44=0A40BC70C1>A34A>=40=>C74AB>C70C=48671>A7>>3B0=338BCA82CB <08=C08=C748A>F=D=8@D4@D0;8C84B

>0;"+&

A40C4 1D8;C0=3=0CDA0;4=E8A>=<4=CBF8C78=C7428CHC70C?A8>A8C8I4 BD??>AC ?A><>C4 0=3 4<1A024 B>280; 4@D8CH 42>;>6820; A464=4A0C8>= A4B?>=B81;4 A4B>DA24 BC4F0A3B78?0=37D<0=740;C70=3F4;;148=6

"+&

>=BCAD2C8>=&A>24BB4B *748CHB70;;4=2>DA064>=B8C42>=BCAD2C8>=?A>24BB4BC70C A43D244=E8A>=<4=C0;70A<0=3BD??>ACBDBC08=01;4<4C7>3B

<?A>E4 -0;:8=6 >==42C8E8CH *74 8CH B70;; A4@D8A4 =4F BD138E8B8>=B =4F <D;C8D=8C 3F4;;8=6 34E4;>?<4=CB 0=3 =4F 34E4;>?<4=CB 0;>=6 2><<4A280; 2>AA83>AB C> 8=2;D34F4;;;8CCA44B70343F0;:F0HBF74A4540B81;4C70C?A>E83438A42C;8=:BC>C74?D1;82 A40;<>A039024=C ?D1;8234BC8=0C8>=B BD270BCA0=B8CBC>?B0=3 BC0C8>=BB27>>;B?0A:B0=3 B7>??8=624=C4AB

)70A43&0A:8=6 *7A>D67C7434E4;>?<4=CA4E84F?A>24BBC748CHB70;;4=2>DA064 ?A>942C0??;820=CB?A>?>B8=63D?;4G<D;C8D=8C<8G43DB40=3=>=A4B834=C80;?A>942CBC>58ABC Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 33 ends

4G?;>A4 B70A43DB4 >5 4G8BC8=6 ?0A:8=6 B?024B C70C 20= 14 0E08;01;4 5>A 3D0; DB4B 145>A4 ?A>?>B8=6C>2>=BCAD2C=4F?0A:8=65028;8C84B

# *A05582 *748CHB70;;BD??>AC?;0==8=60=3<0=068=6CA055825A><C74?4AB?42C8E4>5 C74039024=CDB4BDB8=6CA05582<0=064<4=C0=3CA0558220;<8=6C427=8@D4B

# =C46A0C43
>>3B#>E4<4=C *748CHB70;;F>A:C>4=BDA4C70CC746>>3B<>E4<4=C B42C>A8B8=C46A0C43 F8C7C74 A4BC >5C74CA0=B?>AC0C8>= BHBC4<8= BD27 0 F0HC70C 3>4B =>C 4=30=64AC74740;C70=3B054CH>5A4B834=CB0=3>C74AA>03F0HDB4AB

>0;
!
;40=08AF0C4A0=3B>8;F8C7=>B46<4=C >5C742><<D=8CH38B?A>?>AC8>=0C4;H 1DA34=431H4=E8A>=<4=C2>=38C8>=B

!
+A10= 6A82D;CDA4 8= $4F 4E4;>?<4=C *74 8CH B70;; ?A><>C4 A>>5C>? 60A34=B 4381;460A34=B0=3>C74ABDBC08=01;406A82D;CDA0;;0=3B20?8=60;C4A=0C8E4BF8C78=<D;C8D=8C 2><<4A280;0=38=3DBCA80;34E4;>?<4=CB

"8<8C+=740;C7H
>>3
BC01;8B7<4=CB *748CHB70;;4G?;>A4<4270=8B<BC>;8<8C D=740;C7H 5>>3 4BC01;8B7<4=CB 4B?4280;;H 8= 38B03E0=C0643 2><<D=8C84B B 0=3 78BC>A820;;HD=34AB4AE430A40B

8B2>DA064+=740;C7H+B4B *748CHB7>D;3 38B2>DA064C744BC01;8B7<4=C>5 =4F 3A8E4C7A>D67A4BC0DA0=CB0;2>7>;?4A<8CB5>A>55B8C4B0;4B0=3C>1022>B0;4B?>8=CB=40A5>>3 34B4ACBB27>>;B0=3?434BCA80=?A8>A8CH0A40B

>0;
( ;8<0C4 ;4034AB78? 0=3 1>;3 02C8>= C> 02784E4 20A1>= =4DCA0;8CH 1H

066A4BB8E4;HA43D244<8BB8>=B1H

0=38=2A40B42;8<0C4A4B8;84=242><<D=8CHF834

(
><<D=8CHF834

(43D2C8>= *748CHB70;;8<?;4<4=CC74;8<0C42C8>=0=3 30?C0C8>=&;0= &0 @D0;85843 6A44=7>DB4 60B

A43D2C8>= ?;0=C70C<44CBC74
A4@D8A4<4=CB>5C740;85>A=80
=E8A>=<4=C0;'D0;8CH2C
'
D834;8=4B

1C>
A43D242><<D=8CH0=3<D=828?0;4<8BB8>=B2>=B8BC4=CF8C7C74BC0C4’B

A43D2C8>=6>0;B

DB8=4BB CCA02C8>= 0=3
G?0=B8>= *74 8CH B7>D;3 4=340E>A C> 5>2DB 1DB8=4BB 0CCA02C8>= 0=3 A4C4=C8>=
4G?0=B8>= 455>ACB >= 4<4A68=6 8=3DBCA84B 8= C74 A468>= C70C 34<>=BCA0C4BCA>=66A>FC7?>C4=C80;0=3?0H78674AC70=0E4A064F064B

D838=6 &A8=28?;4
>=24=CA0C4 =4F 6A>FC7 F8C78= )02A0<4=C>’B 4G8BC8=6 5>>C?A8=C C> ?A><>C402><?02C34E4;>?<4=C?0CC4A=C70CBD??>ACB4558284=C34;8E4AH>5?D1;82B4AE824B0=3 8=5A0BCAD2CDA4F78;4?A>C42C8=6BDAA>D=38=6>?4=B?024;0=3B

D838=6 &A8=28?;4
"8=: =4F 6A>FC7 F8C7 0224BB C> 78675A4@D4=2H CA0=B8C 8= >A34A C> >?C8<8I4?D1;828=E4BC<4=CB0=3BD??>AC0=0224BB81;42>=E4=84=C=4CF>A:C70C>554AB0E801;4 0;C4A=0C8E4C>C740DC><>18;40=3?A><>C4B?D1;82740;C7 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 34 ends

D838=6 &A8=28?;4 #0:4 )02A0<4=C> 0 <>34; >5 BDBC08=01;4 ;8E8=6 1H ?A><>C8=6 4=E8A>=<4=C0;;H2>=B28>DB740;C7?A><>C8=60=30645A84=3;H34B86=>51D8;38=6B?0A:B0=3 8=5A0BCAD2CDA40BF4;;0B1H?A><>C8=6C74030?C8E4A4DB4>54G8BC8=61D8;38=6B0=3C7420A45D; 2>=B4AE0C8>=>54=4A6HF0C4A>?4=B?024BCA44B0=3>C74A=0CDA0;A4B>DA24B

D838=6&A8=28?;4 *0:4 1>;302C8>=C>02784E420A1>= =4DCA0;8CH 1H

0=3 142><40
;4038=6E>8248=C74455>ACC>A43D246A44=7>DB460B4<8BB8>=B0=3030?CC>2;8<0C4270=64
D838=6 &A8=28?;4
028;8C0C4 C74 DB4 >5 8==>E0C8E4 0??A>0274B =4F C427=>;>684B 0=3 42>=><8234E4;>?<4=CC>3A0<0C820;;HA43D24?4A20?8C04=4A6HDB4F0BC40=3?>;;DC0=CB *74
(<DBC0;B>14A4E8B43C>A4<>E4<8B;4038=60=34AA>=4>DB2>=B8BC4=2H0=0;HB8B5>AB4E4A0; 8C4A4G0<?;4C74
(2>=2;D34BC74?A>942C8B2>=B8BC4=CF8C7O"+&

8A?>AC"0=3+B4
><?0C818;8CH *748CHB70;;F>A:F8C7C74)02A0<4=C>>D=CH8A?>AC)HBC4<))0=3C74 8A?>AC"0=3+B4><<8BB8>="+C>4=BDA4C70C=4F34E4;>?<4=C=40AC740A40’B08A?>ACB8B 2><?0C81;4 F8C7 08A?>AC >?4A0C8>=B 03>?C43 "+ ?>;8284B 0=3 0??;8201;4 8A?>AC "0=3 +B4 ><?0C818;8CH&;0=BP1420DB4O10B43>=C740=0;HB8B?A4B4=C43C7A>D67>DCC78B (C74?A>?>B43
?A>942C F>D;3 14 2><?0C81;4 F8C7 08A?>AC >?4A0C8>=B 03>?C43 "+ ?>;8284B 0=3 0??;8201;4 "+&;0=B P>F4E4AC74
(3>4B=>C?A>E8340=H<40=8=65D;4E834=24C>BD??>AC0;4BBC70= B86=85820=C 58=38=6 *74
( 8B <8B;4038=6 C> C74 ?D1;82 0=3 3428B8>= <0:4AB 1H 4G2;D38=6 8=5>A<0C8>=A460A38=6C74BC0CDC>A8;HA4@D8A43A4E84F1H)% "+ *74?A>?>B43?A>942C
A4@D8A4B0
4=4A0;&;0=<4=3<4=CC>270=64C74;0=3DB434B86=0C8>=>=C74?A>942CB8C4 &A8>A C>C740<4=3<4=C>50
4=4A0;&;0=C74"+B70;;A4E84FC74?;0=>A38=0=24>AA46D;0C8>=5>A 2>=B8BC4=2HF8C7C74"+&&+)42C8>=

1 -78;4C74&A>942C4B2A8?C8>=>5C74
(
BC0C4BC70C)%
"+A4E84F8BA4@D8A438C8B4G2;D3435A><0=0;HB8BF8C78=C78BB42C8>= *74

(<DBC14A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=240BC74?A>942C3>4B=>C2><?;HF8C7&+ )42C8>=

10=3C7401>E48CH>5)02A0<4=C>
4=4A0;&;0=?>;82H
*74
( 0;B> 2>=2;D34B C70C C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 8B 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 O# ,4782;4 #8;4B
*A0E4;43 ,#* 0B #4CA82 >=B8BC4=C F8C7 BC0C4 ;0F C74 8CH B70;; 4E0;D0C4 CA0=B?>AC0C8>= 0;85>A=80
=E8A>=<4=C0; 'D0;8CH 2C
' 8<?02CB DB8=6 E4782;4 <8;4B CA0E4;43 >A >C74A <4CA82B0B34C4A<8=431HC748CH0=3B70;;=>CA4;H>=0DC><>18;434;0H0B34B2A81431H;4E4;>5 B4AE824>AB8<8;0A<40BDA4B>5E4782D;0A34;0H0B0<40BDA4>54=E8A>=<4=C0;B86=85820=24 ">20; *A0=B?>AC0C8>==0;HB4B"*B70;;2>=C8=D4C>14A4@D8A43F74==424BB0AHC>0838=2>=38C8>=8=6 ?A>942C4=C8C;4<4=CB 5>A =44343 >?4A0C8>=0;8<?A>E4<4=CB P *74 ( BC0C4BC70C 1420DB4 OC74
?A>?>B43?A>942C3>4B=>C8=2;D340=HA4C08;DB4B8=4G24BB>5

B5 *74A45>A4C747867F0H
2><<4A280; DB4B 0A4 2>=B834A43 C> 14 ;>20;B4AE8=6 A4C08; 0=3 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 %&( 6D830=24 F>D;3 A4BD;C 8= 0 ;4BBC70=B86=85820=C 8<?02C A4;0C43 C> ,#* P *78B 0=0;HB8B 4G2;D34B C74 %0-*362-%-64368
0%22-2+%2(#7)%2(&33/!)'8-32
# ):-);,8847(38'%+3:
1)(-%(381)(-%463+6%17%)632%98-'7(3'91)287'%0-*362-%%-643680%2(97)40%22-2+,%2(&33/%=4(* Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 35 ends

?A>?>B43 7>C4; ;>20C43 >= C74 867F0H ><<4A280; ?0A24;B *74 ?A>?>B43 7>C4; 8B =>C 0 ;>20; B4AE8=6 DB4 0=3 8B

B@D0A4 544C *74A45>A4 C78B 0CC4<?C43 4G4<?C8>= 5A>< ,#* 0=0;HB8B 3>4B =>C 0??;H 0=3 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 <DBC 14 <034 0B ?0AC >5 0 A4E8B43 ( *74
(
2>=C8=D4B 1H BC0C8=6 C70C OC74 >=B8C4 8=3DBCA80; DB4B 0A4 0=C828?0C43 C> 64=4A0C4 ,#* 0C

?4A24=C >5 C74 A468>=0; 0E4A064 F7827 8B 01>E4 C74 B86=85820=24 C7A4B7>;3 4BC01;8B743 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C *74A45>A4 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F>D;3 14 A4@D8A43 C> 2><?;H F8C7 #8C860C8>= #40BDA4

F7827 A4@D8A4B C70C C74 >F=4A
>?4A0C>A >5 >=B8C4 8=3DBCA80; 1D8;38=6 ?A4?0A4 0=3
8<?;4<4=C 0 ,#* (43D2C8>= &;0= C> A43D24 ,#* 1H 0C ;40BC

?4A24=C ?A8>A C> C74 24AC85820C4 >5
>22D?0=2H 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 C74 ,#* #8C860C8>= #4<>A0=3D< ?A4?0A43 1H C74 8CH’B &D1;82 ->A:B 4?0AC<4=C 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C P>F4E4A 8C 8B =>C ?>BB81;4 5>A C74 8CH C> 4=BDA4 C70C ##

F8;; A4BD;C 8= A43D243 ,#* 1H ?A>942C 4<?;>H44B 0=3 14 8<?;4<4=C43 2>=C8=D>DB;H 0C 0;; C8<4B C7A>D67>DC C74 ;854 >5 C74 ?A>942C 0=3 <08=C08= 0 ,#* A43D2C8>= C> ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C ;4E4;B 0C 0;; C8<4B *74 4558202H >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 <8C860C8>= <40BDA4B 0=3 A43D2C8>= >5 ,#* 8<?02CB 14;>F C74 0??;8201;4 C7A4B7>;3B 20==>C 14 0BBDA43 0=3 C74 ?A>942CRB ,#* 8<?02C 8B C74A45>A4 2>=B834A43 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 0
58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 1420DB4 C74A4 8B => ?>BB81;4 0BBDA0=24 >5 C74 ?4A24=C064 >5 ?A>942C 4<?;>H44B C70C F>D;3 DC8;8I4 =>=0DC><>18;4 >A =>=B8=6;4 >22D?0=C E4782;4 CA0E4; 0BB>280C43 F8C7 C74 <8C860C8>= <40BDA4B 0=3 <8C860C8>= >5 C74 ?A>942CRB ,#* 8<?02C C> ;4BB C70= B86=85820=C 8B =>C 540B81;4
*74
( 0;B> 2>=2;D34B C74 ?A>942C 8B 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 O
( %?4A0C8>=0;
<8BB8>=B *74 8CH
B70;; A4@D8A4 34E4;>?<4=C ?A>942CB C70C 4G2443 )02A0<4=C> #4CA>?>;8C0= 8A 'D0;8CH #0=064<4=C 8BCA82C )#'# A402C8E4 >A60=82 60B (%
0=3 =8CA>64= >G834 $%. >?4A0C8>=0; C7A4B7>;3B
C> 8=2>A?>A0C4 34B86= >A >?4A0C8>=0; 540CDA4B C70C A43D24 4<8BB8>=B 4@D0; C> ?4A24=C 5A>< C74
;4E4; C70C F>D;3 14 ?A>3D243 1H 0= D=<8C860C43 ?A>942CP 1420DB4 O= '#& F0B ?A4?0A43 0B A4@D8A43 1H #8C860C8>= #40BDA4
0=3 8=2;D34B 0;; 540B81;4 <40BDA4B C> A43D24 4<8BB8>=B 3DA8=6 ?A>942C >?4A0C8>=B 8=2;D38=6 C74 ?A>7818C8>= >5 =0CDA0; 60B ?0AC828?0C8>= 8= 0 *# DB4 >5 I4A>4<8BB8>= 5>A:;85CB DB4 >5 I4A> 4<8BB8>= E4782;4B 8= C7A44 ?4A24=C >5 C74 740EH3DCH E4782;4 5;44C 0=3 C74 ?A>E8B8>= >5 ?434BCA80= 0=3 182H2;4 8=5A0BCAD2CDA4 P*78B 0=0;HB8B 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0=H 8=5>A<0C8>= A460A38=6 @D0=C8CH >5 <8C860C8>= 0=3 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 <DBC 14 <034 0B ?0AC >5 0 A4E8B43
(
*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 8=5>A<0C8>= >A 0=0;HB8B >= C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= *01;4

A>FC7 &A>942C8>=B 5>A )02A0<4=C>

4=4A0; &;0= F8C78= C74

4=4A0; &;0=
( BC0C4B C70C C74 8CH F8;; 033

9>1B 5A><

*01;4
8CHF834
D8;3>DC 1H >=24?C A40 BC0C4B C70C C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= F8;; 70E4

,8847;;;'-8=3*7%'6%1)283+3:'328)28(%14368%0'(( 0%22-2+2:-6321)28%014%'8
)43687
+49%2('%%4!%'6%1)283

63.)'8

4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 36 ends

=3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0C 1D8;3>DC *01;4
8CHF834 D8;3>DC )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H<4=C 8= C74 4=C8A4 8CH F8;; 8=2A40B4 1H
9>1B 0C 1D8;3>DC )8=24 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 8B =>C
;>20C43 F8C78= C74 8=2>A?>A0C43 8CH ;8<8CB >A 8CB )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C C74A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 >5

=4F 4<?;>H44B 01>E4 C74B4 ?A>942C8>=B $>C01;H C74
?A>?>B43 ?A>942CRB

4<?;>H44B F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0=C828?0C43 5>A C74 4=C8A4CH >5 C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= 1H

8C F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 8CH 1H 0=3 8=2A40B4 C>C0; 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 28CH 1H
*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CH
4=4A0; &;0=
1D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 8=2;D38=6 0;; 2D<D;0C8E4 34E4;>?<4=C 2>=BCAD2C43 B8=24 03>?C8>= 0??A>E43 ?A>942CB =>C H4C 2>=BCAD2C43 0=3 O?A>942CB 8= C74 ?8?4;8=4 P A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C>
8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B 0=3 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 0B C74 ?A>942C F8;; 8=3D24 6A>FC7 8= C74 0A40 0=3 4G2443B C74

4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 5>A C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43+B4 34B86=0C8>= C70C F0B 34E4;>?43
5>A C74 ?DA?>B4 >5 0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C A43D24 ,#*

0=3 8<?A>E4
08A @D0;8CH E80 2><?02C <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C
,
)-+*,.
.%*)
*74
( B>DA24B C74
>E4A=>ARB %55824 >5 &;0==8=6 0=3 (4B40A27 %&(

'
D834;8=4B
*427=820; 3E8B>AH 8= 8CB ,#* 0=0;HB8B
>A C74 867F0H ><<4A280; DB4B C74
( BC0C4B C70C
022>A38=6 C> %&( OC74 ?>C4=C80; 5>A ,#* 8<?02CB 022>A38=6 C> C78B 0??A>027 78=64B >= F74C74A C74 ?A>942C 20= 14 2>=B834A43 ;>20;B4AE8=6 >A A468>=0; H 0338=6 A4C08; >??>ACD=8C84B F8C78= 4G8BC8=6 =48671>A7>>3B ;>20;B4AE8=6 A4C08; ?A>942CB 20= B7>AC4= CA8?B 0=3 A43D24 >E4A0;; ,#* = 2>=CA0BC A468>=0; 34BC8=0C8>= A4C08; ?A>942CB F>D;3 3A0F 2DBC><4AB 5A>< ;0A64A CA034 0A40B ?>C4=C80;;H BD1BC8CDC8=6 5>A B7>AC4A CA8?B 0=3 8=2A40B8=6 ,#* *74 %&( 6D830=24 BD664BCB C70C 0=H A4C08; ?A>942CB 8=2;D38=6 BC>A4B ;0A64A C70=

B5 <867C 14 2>=B834A43 A468>=0; B4AE8=6 A4C08;
*74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 3>4B =>C 8=2;D34 0=H A4C08; DB4B 8= 4G24BB >5

B5 *74A45>A4 C74
&+ DB4B 0A4 2>=B834A43 C> 14 ;>20;B4AE8=6 A4C08; 0=3 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7 %&( 6D830=24 F>D;3 A4BD;C 8= 0 ;4BBC70=B86=85820=C 8<?02C A4;0C43 C> ,#* P>F4E4A C74 ?DA?>B4 >5 C74 %&( *427=820; 3E8B>AH 3>2D<4=C 8B ?DA4;H 03E8B>AH BC0C8=6 8= 8CB 8=CA>3D2C8>= O*74 ?DA?>B4 >5 C78B 3>2D<4=C 8B C> ?A>E834 03E824 0=3 A42><<4=30C8>=B F7827 064=284B 0=3 >C74A 4=C8C84B <0H DB4 0C C748A 38B2A4C8>= *78B 3>2D<4=C 3>4B =>C 0;C4A ;403 064=2H 38B2A4C8>= 8= ?A4?0A8=6 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 3>2D<4=CB BD1942C C>
' *78B 3>2D<4=C B7>D;3 =>C 14 2>=BCAD43 0B
;460; 03E824 P
3:)6236>7
**-') 3*
0%22-2+ %2( )7)%6', ")',2-'%0 (:-736= 32 :%09%8-2+ "6%274368%8-32 14%'87 -2 ,8847346'%+3:')5%(3'7
$")',2-'%0$(:-736=4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 37 ends

*74%&(3>2D<4=C8B=>C0;460;8=C4A?A4C0C8>=2>DAC3428B8>=>A0<4=3<4=CC>C74 'BC0CDC4
C70C?A>E834B0BD1BC8CDC4C7A4B7>;3>5B86=85820=24 #>BC=>C01;HC74 (RB0=0;HB8B4G2;D34BC74
?A>?>B437>C4;;>20C43>=C74867F0H><<4A280;?0A24;B *74?A>?>B437>C4;8B=>C0;>20; B4AE8=6DB40=38B

B@D0A4544C *74A45>A44E4=DC8;8I8=6C74
(RB0CC4<?C43;>6825>A0=
4G4<?C8>=5A><,#*0=0;HB8B3>4B=>C0??;H0=3058=38=6>5B86=85820=24<DBC14<0340B?0AC >50A4E8B43
(
;C7>D67C74
(2>=2;D34BOC74>=B8C48=3DBCA80;DB4B0A40=C828?0C43C>64=4A0C4,#*0C

?4A24=C >5 C74 A468>=0; 0E4A064 F7827 8B 01>E4 C74 B86=85820=24 C7A4B7>;3 4BC01;8B743 5>A C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942CP 8C 70B BC8;; D=34AA4?>AC43 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 ,#* 64=4A0C43 1H C74 ?A>942CRB 8=3DBCA80;DB4B *74
(4G2;D34BCA8?B<0341H<438D<0=3740EH3DCHCAD2:B
CA08;4AB5A><,#*
0=0;HB8B *74,#*0=0;HB8BA4;84BD?>=C74%&(

'
D834;8=4B*427=820;3E8B>AH0=3
8CBBC0C4<4=CC70COQE4782;4<8;4BCA0E4;43RA454ABC>C740<>D=C0=338BC0=24>50DC><>18;4CA0E4; 0CCA81DC01;4C>0?A>942CPF74A40DC><>18;4A454ABC>?0BB4=64AE4782;4BB?4285820;;H20AB0=3;867C CAD2:BPF78278BC74%&(

>5&()42C8>=

C>2>=2;D34C70CC74?A>942C
F8;; 70E4;4BBC70= B86=85820=C8<?02CB *74 %&( 3>2D<4=C8B =>C0;460;8=C4A?A4C0C8>= 2>DAC 3428B8>=>A0<4=3<4=CC>C74
'BC0CDC4C70C2;0A8584BC743458=8C8>=>50DC><>18;4 *74C4A< O0DC><>18;4P 8B =>C 3458=43 8=C74
' BC0CDC4 0=3 0??;820C8>= >5C74 %&(8=C4A?A4C0C8>= 8B B?42D;0C8E4 0=3 3>4B =>C ?A>E834 0= 0=0;HB8B >5 C74 OF>ABC20B4 B24=0A8>P 5>A 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 8<?02CB -834B?A403 ?D1;82 D=34ABC0=38=6 0=3 ?4A24?C8>= 8=3820C4B C70C CAD2:B 8=2;D38=6 <438D<
740EH3DCH CAD2:

CA08;4A CA8?B 0BB>280C43 F8C7 C74 8=3DBCA80; =0CDA4 >5 F0A47>DB4 >?4A0C8>=B0A40DC><>18;4B =
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D340;;CAD2:

CA08;4A0=3>?4A0C8>=0;
34;8E4AHE0=02C8E8CH5>A@D0=C85843,#*0=0;HB8B *74>?4A0C8>=0;=0CDA4>58=3DBCA80; F0A47>DB4
DB4B8=E>;E4B7867A0C4B>5CAD2:

CA08;4A0=334;8E4AHE0=,#*3D4C>CA0E4;8=65A><;0A64A468>=0; 38BCA81DC8>=24=C4ABC>B<0;;4A8=3DBCA80;?0A:B0=3C74=C>C748A58=0;34;8E4AH34BC8=0C8>=B %=24 4<?;>H44B 0AA8E4 0C C74 8=3DBCA80; 1D8;38=6B 5>A F>A: C74H F8;; 2>=3D2C C748A 9>1B 1H 3A8E8=6 CAD2:

CA08;4A
34;8E4AHE0=B02A>BBC74A468>=0B?0AC>5C74308;H>?4A0C8>=B0B0F0A47>DB4F7827 F8;;3A0BC820;;H8=2A40B4?A>942C64=4A0C43,#* *74?A>942CRBCAD2:

CA08;4A
34;8E4AHE0=02C8E8CH
8B D=01;4C>DC8;8I4 ?D1;82CA0=B8C >A02C8E4CA0=B?>AC0C8>=0=38C8B<8B;4038=6C>C74?D1;820=3 3428B8>=<0:4ABC>4G2;D34C78B02C8E8CH5A><,#*0=0;HB8B A4E8B43 (<DBC14?A4?0A43C>
A45;42C 0 @D0=C85843 ,#* 0=0;HB8B C70C 8=2;D34B 0;; CAD2:

CA08;4A 0=3 34;8E4AH E0= 02C8E8CH C>
034@D0C4;H0=3022DA0C4;H0=0;HI4C74?>C4=C80;;HB86=85820=C?A>942CCA0=B?>AC0C8>=8<?02CB *74
(?A>E834B#8C860C8>=#40BDA4

C><8C860C48<?02CBC>;4BBC70=B86=85820=C;4E4;B O&A8>AC>C7424AC85820C4>5>22D?0=2H 5>A4027>=B8C48=3DBCA80;1D8;38=6C74>F=4A >?4A0C>A>5
40271D8;38=6B70;;14A4@D8A43C>?A4?0A40=38<?;4<4=C0,#*(43D2C8>=&;0=C70C8=2;D34B0 BD558284=CB4;42C8>=>5&%*A8?(43D2C8>=&A>6A0<B*C7A>D67* C>A43D24,#*1H
0C;40BC

?4A24=C 2>=B8BC4=C F8C7C74 ,#* #8C860C8>=#4<>A0=3D< ?A4?0A43 1H C748CHRB Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 38 ends

&D1;82->A:B4?0AC<4=C5>AC74?A>?>B43?A>942CB44??4=38G'C>C74 ( &%*A8?
(43D2C8>=&A>6A0<B*C7A>D67*
8=2;D34<40BDA4BBD270B8<?;4<4=C8=602><<DC4CA8? A43D2C8>=?A>6A0<0=3
>A<0A:4C8=6?A>E838=60A834B70A4?A>6A0<8<?;4<4=C8=60BD1B838I43 >A 38B2>D=C43 CA0=B8C ?A>6A0< ?A>E838=6 4=3>5CA8? 182H2;4 5028;8C84B ?A>E838=6 4<?;>H4A B?>=B>A43E0=?>>;?A828=6F>A:?;0247>DB8=60=38<?;4<4=C8=64<?;>H44?0A:8=620B7>DC *74 ,#*(43D2C8>=&;0=B70;;14BD1<8CC43C>C748CHRB4?0AC<4=C>5&D1;82->A:B0=3><<D=8CH 4E4;>?<4=C4?0AC<4=C5>AA4E84F0=30??A>E0; P
$>C01;HC74
(70B=>C?A>E8343<40=8=65D;4E834=24C>BD??>ACC742>=2;DB8>=C70C#8C860C8>= #40BDA4

F8;;A43D24,#*1H

#8C860C8>=#40BDA4

8BD=4=5>A2401;4<8C860C8>=
8= E8>;0C8>= >5
' K

1 C8B =>C ?>BB81;4 5>AC748CHC>4=BDA4C70C#8C860C8>= #40BDA4

F8;; A4BD;C 8= A43D243 ,#* 1H ?A>942C 4<?;>H44B 0=3 14 8<?;4<4=C43 2>=C8=D>DB;H0C0;;C8<4BC7A>D67>DCC74;854>5C74?A>942C0=3<08=C08=0,#*A43D2C8>=C>;4BB C70=B86=85820=C;4E4;B0C0;;C8<4B *744558202H>5C74?A>?>B43<8C860C8>=<40BDA4B0=3A43D2C8>= >5,#*8<?02CB14;>FC740??;8201;4C7A4B7>;3B20==>C140BBDA430=3C74?A>942CRB,#*8<?02C 8BC74A45>A42>=B834A43B86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;4 A4E8B43 (<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D340
58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 1420DB4 C74A4 8B => ?>BB81;4 0BBDA0=24 >5 C74 ?4A24=C064 >5 ?A>942C 4<?;>H44BC70CF>D;3DC8;8I4=>=0DC><>18;4>A=>=B8=6;4>22D?0=CE4782;4CA0E4;0BB>280C43F8C7 C74<8C860C8>=<40BDA4B0=3<8C860C8>=>5C74?A>942CRB,#*8<?02CC>;4BBC70=B86=85820=C8B=>C 540B81;4
*74
(70B=>C034@D0C4;H0=0;HI43C74?A>942CRB?>C4=C80;C>BD1BC0=C80;;H8=2A40B470I0A3B3D4 C>064><4CA8234B86=540CDA44 6 B70A?2DAE4B>A30=64A>DB8=C4AB42C8>=B>A8=2><?0C81;4DB4B >A C74 ?A>942CRB ?>C4=C80; C> A4BD;C 8= 8=034@D0C4 4<4A64=2H 0224BB *74A4 0A4 => 4G7818CB 034@D0C4;H 34?82C8=6 C74 0E08;01;4 <0=4DE4A8=6 0=3 @D4D48=6 B?024 5>A CAD2:B CA08;4AB 0C C74
8=C4AB42C8>=>5C74?A>942C3A8E4F0HB0=3C74039024=CBCA44CB *74A40A40;B>=>4G7818CB034@D0C4;H 34?82C8=6C74>=B8C4CDA=8=6A038DB0E08;01;45>ACAD2:B<0=4DE4A8=6C7A>D67>DCC748=3DBCA80;B8C4B $>C01;H 4E4= C7>D67 C74
G42DC8E4 )D<<0AH BC0C4B C70C C74
( ?A>E834B 0 ?A>942CB?428582
0=0;HB8B?DABD0=CC>
'
D834;8=4B)42C8>=

5>A0;;0A40B4G24?CC74=>=?0AC828?0C8=6
?0A24;B
86DA4)8C4&;0=3>4B=>C8=2;D340=HDB45D;8=5>A<0C8>=C70CF>D;314DC8;8I435>A 0=0;HB8BBD270BC74;>20C8>=>5C74CAD2:

CA08;4A;>038=63>2:B?0BB4=64A20A?0A:8=6B?024B0=3 CAD2:

CA08;4A?0A:8=6B?024B ;;>5C74B48C4<B0A4=424BB0AHC>2>=3D2C0=HCH?4>510B820=0;HB8B A460A38=6 64><4CA82 34B86= 540CDA4B 0=3 4<4A64=2H 0224BB 0=3 C74 ( 8B 8=034@D0C4 0B 0=
8=5>A<0C8>=0;3>2D<4=C0B8C8B=>C?>BB81;4C>0B24AC08=0=H<40=8=65D;0=0;HB8B10B43D?>=C74 8=5>A<0C8>=?A>E8343 A4E8B43
(<DBC14?A4?0A43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C> C74B4B86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;48<?02CBC70C70E4=>C144=0=0;HI43 338C8>=0;;HC74
(70B=>C?A>E83430=H0=0;HB8B>5C740E08;01;47>A8I>=C0;0=3E4AC820;B867C 38BC0=240CC748=C4AB42C8>= >5C74?A>942C 3A8E4F0HB0=3039024=CBCA44CB )867C38BC0=248BC74 Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 39 ends

2>=C8=D>DB;4=6C7>5BCA44C07403E8B81;4C>C743A8E4A CD=B86=0;8I438=C4AB42C8>=B2>A=4AB867C 38BC0=24<DBC?A>E8340BD1BC0=C80;;H2;40A;8=4>5B867C14CF44=C743A8E4A>5C74E4782;4F08C8=6 >=C74<8=>AA>033A8E4F0H0=3C743A8E4A>50=0??A>0278=6E4782;4 A4E8B43 (<DBC14
?A4?0A43F8C70B867C38BC0=240=0;HB8B10B43>=C74<4A820=BB>280C8>=>5)C0C4867F0H0=3 *A0=B?>AC0C8>=%558280;B)*%)C>??8=6)867C8BC0=24A4@D8A4<4=CB

,*1.$) /%)#(+
.-
)
%#)%"%
).,,!0!,-%
'!)0%,*)(!).
'$
)#!-
*74
(?A>E834B4AA>=4>DB0=3<8B;4038=60=0;HB8B>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942CDC8;8I8=6D=24AC08= ;0=6D064 *74
(2;08<BC70CO1420DB4>5C748=3DBCA80;0=32><<4A280;=0CDA4>5C74?A>?>B43 ?A>942C1D8;3>DCF>D;3=>C38A42C;HA4BD;C8=0=8=2A40B48=?>?D;0C8>=>A2>=BCAD2C8>=>57>DB8=6 P >F4E4AC74
(4G2;D34BC70CC74?A>?>B43?A>942C8B>DCB834>5C748CHRB)% <40=8=6C70C8C F8;;A4?A4B4=C0<0A:438=2A40B401>E44G8BC8=66A>FC7?A>942C8>=B C8B2;40AC70CC74?A>?>B43 ?A>942C70B=>C?A4E8>DB;H144=?;0==435>ADA10=34E4;>?<4=C0B8C8B34B86=0C435>A6A82D;CDA0; DB4B1HC74>D=CH>5)02A0<4=C>0=38B>DCB834C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>RB)?74A4>5 =5;D4=24 0A40 338C8>=0;;H
86DA4 ><<D=8CH*H?4BF8C78=C74

#*&
))834=C8584BC74?A>942C
B8C40BO"0=3$>C 34=C858435>A4E4;>?<4=C8=C74#*& ))&;0==8=6&4A8>3P<40=8=6C70C8C
F0B=>C8=2;D3438=0=H6A>FC75>A420BC8=60=3C74#*&
))834=C8584B
6A>FC78=C74B40A40B
<?02CB F8;; A4BD;C 5A>< 34E4;>?<4=C >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C 8=2;D38=6 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;42D<D;0C8E4;H2>=B834A01;48<?02CBC>4BC74C82B6A82D;CDA0;(4B>DA24B8A'D0;8CH 0=3
A44=7>DB4
0B
<8BB8>=B )8=24 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 F0B =>C 8=2;D343 5>A 0=0;HB8B 0B 0= 4<?;>H<4=C 64=4A0C8=6 DB4 1H C74 8CH >D=CH >A )% 8C 8B A4?A4B4=CB 0= 8=2A40B4 8=
?>?D;0C8>=0=34<?;>H<4=C6A>FC7C70CF0B=>C022>D=C435>A1H0=H064=2H *74 (<DBC14
A4E8B43C>8=2;D34058=38=6>5B86=85820=243D4C>C78BB86=85820=C0=3D=0E>8301;48<?02C *74
(2>=C8=D4B1HBC0C8=6C70CO-78;42>=BCAD2C8>=>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942CF>D;3A4BD;C8=0

8=2A40B48=2>=BCAD2C8>=4<?;>H<4=C>??>ACD=8C84B2>=BCAD2C8>=F>D;314C4<?>A0AH0=3 9>1B F>D;3

14 58;;43 1H C74 4<?;>H44 10B4 P *74 ( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H
34<>6A0?7828=5>A<0C8>=A460A38=6C74O;>20;P4<?;>H4410B40=3C7464>6A0?7821>D=30A84B>5 C74 O;>20;P 4<?;>H44 10B4 0A4 D=3458=43 *74A4 8B => 8=5>A<0C8>= A460A38=6 C74 0E08;01;4 2>=BCAD2C8>= F>A:5>A24 0=3C74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H <40=8=65D; 4E834=24C> BD??>ACC74 2>=2;DB8>=C74?A>942CF8;;=>C8=3D246A>FC7
*74
(0;B>BC0C4BC70CO;C7>D6734E4;>?<4=C>5C74?A>?>B43?A>942C2>D;364=4A0C40C>C0;>5 0??A>G8<0C4;H

4<?;>H44B=4F4<?;>H44BF>D;3

143A0F=5A><2DAA4=CA4B834=CB

22>A38=6C> C74 8CH’B ?>?D;0C8>= ?A>942C8>=B 0B ?A4B4=C438= *01;4 8CH >5 )02A0<4=C>&>?D;0C8>=
A>FC7&A>942C8>=B8=70?C4A "0=3+B40=3&;0==8=6 &>?D;0C8>=
0=3>DB8=6>5C78B
(C74?>?D;0C8>=>5C748CH>5)02A0<4=C>8B0=C828?0C43C>8=2A40B45A><

>=B4AE0C8E4;H4BC8<0C8=6C70C0;;?4A<0=4=C?>B8C8>=B0BB>280C43F8C7 C74 ?A>942C F>D;3 14 58;;43 1H =4F A4B834=CB C>C74

0=3 0BBD<8=6C70C C74
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 40 ends

?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F>D;3 14 5D;;H 1D8;C >DC 0=3 >?4A0C8=6 0C 5D;; 20?028CH 1H

C74 ?A>942C’B
2>=CA81DC8>= C> C74 >E4A0;; ?>?D;0C8>= 8=2A40B4 1H

F>D;3 14 0??A>G8<0C4;H
?4A24=C
*7DB C74 8=2A40B4 8= 9>1B F>D;3 14

2><?0A43 C> C74 8CH’B 4G8BC8=6 0=3 0=C828?0C43 ?>?D;0C8>= ;4E4;B B BD27 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F>D;3 =>C A4BD;C 8= 0 BD1BC0=C80; 8=2A40B4 8= ?4A<0=4=C ?>?D;0C8>= 0=3 0 34<0=3 5>A 7>DB8=6 8= C74 E828=8CH >5 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 P C <DBC 14 =>C43 C70C C74 ?A>942C B8C4 8B =>C F8C78= C74 8=2>A?>A0C43 8CH ;8<8CB >A C74 8CHRB )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 0=3 C74A45>A4 F0B =>C 022>D=C43 5>A F8C78= C74

A4B834=C C>C0; 0=3 C74A45>A4 A4?A4B4=CB 0=
8=2A40B4 >5

=4F A4B834=CB 01>E4 C74

?A>942C8>= *74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H A4;4E0=C
0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CHRB 4<?;>H<4=C ?A>942C8>=B )8=24 C74 ?A>942C B8C4 F0B =>C 8=2;D343 5>A 0=0;HB8B 0B 0= 4<?;>H<4=C 64=4A0C8=6 DB4 1H C74 8CH >D=CH >A )% 8C 8B A4?A4B4=CB 0=
8=2A40B4 8= ?>?D;0C8>= 0=3 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 C70C F0B =>C 022>D=C43 5>A 1H 0=H 064=2H *74

( <DBC 14 A4E8B43 C> 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 3D4 C> C78B B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 8<?02C
)02A0<4=C> >D=28; >5
>E4A=<4=CB )%
03>?C43 C74

#4CA>?>;8C0= *A0=B?>AC0C8>=
&;0=
)DBC08=01;4 ><<D=8C84B )CA0C46H #*&
)) >= $>E4<14A

86DA4
><<D=8CH *H?4B F8C78= C74

86DA4 ><<D=8CH *H?4B 0=3 *01;4
)D<<0AH >5
G?42C43 >DB8=6 0=3
<?;>H<4=C

A>FC7 1H ><<D=8CH *H?4 +C8;8I8=6 C74
(RB 20;2D;0C8>= >5

4<?;>H44B C74 ?A>942C
A4?A4B4=CB 0
8=2A40B4 01>E4 C74 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 ?A>942C8>=B 5A><

F8C78= 0;;
>5 )%
RB
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B B8=6;4 ?A>942C 022>D=C8=6 5>A C78B 0<>D=C >5 C74 ?A>942C43 4<?;>H<4=C 0=3
>A ?>?D;0C8>= >E4A
H40AB A4?A4B4=CB 0 B86=85820=C 0<>D=C >5 6A>FC7
A4E8B43
( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C> 8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B 0=3 0;B> ?A>E834 0 2D<D;0C8E4 0=0;HB8B 38B2DBB8>= >5 ?A>942CB 0??A>E43 B8=24

0=3 ?A>942CB O8= C74 ?8?4;8=4P F8C78=
BC01;8B743
><<D=8C84B 8= C74 )%
A468>= C> 34C4A<8=4 85 C74 ?A>942C F8;; 4G2443 )%
RB 4<?;>H<4=C
6A>FC7 5>A420BC 5>A C74
BC01;8B743 ><<D=8C84B 338C8>=0;;H C74 A4E8B43
( <DBC 0;B> ?A>E834
34<>6A0?782 0=3 64>6A0?782 8=5>A<0C8>= >= C74 ;>20C8>= >5 @D0;85843 F>A:4AB C> 58;; C74B4 ?>B8C8>=B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 0=0;HB8B
*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 8=5>A<0C8>= >A 0=0;HB8B >= C74 1D8;3>DC 2>=38C8>=B >5 C74 8CHRB

4=4A0; &;0= *01;4

A>FC7 &A>942C8>=B 5>A )02A0<4=C>

4=4A0; &;0= F8C78= C74

4=4A0; &;0=
( BC0C4B C70C C74 8CH F8;; 033

9>1B 5A><

*01;4
8CHF834
D8;3>DC 1H >=24?C A40 BC0C4B C70C C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= F8;; 70E4

&&#%
'''%"
"$
%
&%
!
%
&&
!&% &#%%#

,8847;;;'-8=3*7%'6%1)283+3:'328)28(%14368%0'(( 0%22-2+2:-6321)28%014%'8
)43687
+49%2('%%4!%'6%1)283

63.)'8

4(*
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 41 ends

=4F 4<?;>H44B 01>E4 C74B4 ?A>942C8>=B $>C01;H C74
?A>?>B43 ?A>942CRB

4<?;>H44B F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 @D0=C8CH >5 =3DBCA80; 4<?;>H44B 0=C828?0C43 5>A C74 4=C8A4CH >5 C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43 +B4 34B86=0C8>= 1H

8C F8;; 8=2A40B4 C74 =3DBCA80;
4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 8CH 1H 0=3 8=2A40B4 C>C0; 4<?;>H<4=C 6A>FC7 5>A C74 4=C8A4 28CH 1H
*74
( 70B =>C ?A>E8343 0=H 0=0;HB8B A460A38=6 C74 8CH
4=4A0; &;0=
1D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 8=2;D38=6 0;; 2D<D;0C8E4 34E4;>?<4=C 2>=BCAD2C43 B8=24 03>?C8>= 0??A>E43 ?A>942CB =>C H4C 2>=BCAD2C43 0=3 O?A>942CB 8= C74 ?8?4;8=4 P A4E8B43 ( <DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 C>
8=2;D34 C78B 0=0;HB8B 8= >A34A C> ?A>E834 0= 034@D0C4 0=3 022DA0C4 4=E8A>=<4=C0;0=0;HB8B 0=3 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5 B86=85820=24 0B C74 ?A>942C F8;; 8=3D24 6A>FC7 8= C74 0A40 0=3 4G2443B C74

4=4A0; &;0= 1D8;3>DC B24=0A8> 5>A C74
<?;>H<4=C #8G43+B4 34B86=0C8>= C70C F0B 34E4;>?43
5>A C74 ?DA?>B4 >5 0E>838=6 >A <8C860C8=6 0= 4=E8A>=<4=C0; 45542C A43D24 ,#*

0=3 8<?A>E4
08A @D0;8CH E80 2><?02C <8G43DB4 34E4;>?<4=C
*74
( 2>=2;D34B C70C OC74 ?A>942C F>D;3 =>C 14 0=C828?0C43 C> 4;8<8=0C4 0=H >1BC02;4B C> ?>?D;0C8>= 6A>FC7P 1420DB4 OC74 5>A46>8=6 4=C8C;4<4=CB F>D;3 >=;H 0??;H C> C74 ?A>942C B8C4 0=3 F>D;3 =>C 0;;>F 5>A 5DAC74A 4G?0=B8>= >5 C74 8CH 1>D=30A84B >A 0338C8>=0; 34E4;>?<4=C

P*74
( 70B 4G2;D343 5>A 38B2DBB8>= 5>A C74 ?A42434=24 B4CC8=6 02C8>= C70C 0??A>E0; >5 C74 A4@D8A43 )?74A4 >5 =5;D4=24 <4=3<4=C
4=4A0; &;0= <4=3<4=C 0=3
&A4I>=8=6 B4C 5>A 5DCDA4 270=64B 8= C74 0A40 *74
( <DBC 14 A4E8B43 C> 8=2;D34 0 58=38=6 >5
B86=85820=24 0B C74 A4@D8A43 ) % <4=3<4=C

&
&A4I>=8=6 C> 8<?;4<4=C C74 ?A>942C F8;; A4BD;C
8= B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 2D<D;0C8E4;H 2>=B834A01;4 8<?02CB C> 4BC74C82B 6A82D;CDA0; (4B>DA24B 8A 'D0;8CH 0=3
A44=7>DB4
0B
<8BB8>=B 0=3 0??A>E0; >5 C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F8;;
B4C ?A42434=C 5>A 0??A>E0; >5 >C74A )% <4=3<4=CB

&B 0=3 ?A>942CB F8C7 )+ 8<?02CB C70C
A4@D8A4 270=64B 8= ;0=3 DB4 34B86=0C8>=B *78B 8B 0 ?A42434=CB4CC8=6 02C8>= C70C F8;; 4=2>DA064 0=3 5028;8C0C4 >C74A 02C8E8C84B C70C 2>D;3 B86=85820=C;H 05542C C74 4=E8A>=<4=C

'.!,)
.%0!-
*74
( 8B A4@D8A43 C> 4E0;D0C4 0 A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B C> C74 ?A>?>B43 ?A>942C F7827 F8;; 0E>83 >A BD1BC0=C80;;H ;4BB4= 0=H >5 C74 B86=85820=C 45542CB >5 C74 ?A>942C ' K

*74 0;C4A=0C8E4B 27>B4= 5>A 0=0;HB8B 8=2;D34 C74
' A4@D8A43 O$> &A>942C
$> D8;3P 0;C4A=0C8E4
0=3 >=;H CF> >C74AB

&4A24=C
;42CA82
;44C ;C4A=0C8E4 0=3 (43D243
>>C?A8=C ;C4A=0C8E4
*74
( 3>4B =>C 4E0;D0C4 0 A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0B >=;H CF> 0;C4A=0C8E4B 14H>=3 C74 A4@D8A43 $> &A>942C 0;C4A=0C8E4 8B 0=0;HI43 *74
( <DBC 14 A4E8B43 C> 8=2;D34 0=0;HB8B >5 0
A40B>=01;4 A0=64 >5 0;C4A=0C8E4B 0=3 5>BC4A 8=5>A<43 3428B8>= <0:8=6 ' K

*78B
2>D;3 8=2;D34 0;C4A=0C8E4B BD27 0B 34E4;>?<4=C >5 C74 B8C4 F8C7 0 ?A>942C C70C A43D24B C74 B86=85820=C 0=3 D=0E>8301;4 4BC74C82B 6A82D;CDA0; (4B>DA24B 8A 'D0;8CH 0=3

8<?02CB C> ;4BB C70=
Scott Johnson
May 27, 2025

Page 42 ends

B86=85820=C ;4E4;B 0=3 0 <8G43DB4 ?A>942C C70C ?A>E834B 055>A301;4 7>DB8=6 0=3 ;>20;B4AE8=6 2><<4A280;DB4BC70C<0HA43D24,#*

4<8BB8>=B0=38<?A>E48A'D0;8CH
*)'/-%*)

>AC745>A46>8=6A40B>=B
)
!14;84E4BC74
(

(0=3(4B?>=B4C>><<4=CB0A45;0F43
0=30 A4E8B43
(<DBC 14 ?A4?0A43 5>AC74 ?A>?>B43?A>942C0=328A2D;0C43 5>A ?D1;82 A4E84F

>;34= )C0C4
=E8A>=<4=C0; !DBC824 ;;80=24 A4@D4BCB C> 14 03343 C> C74 ?D1;82 8=C4A4BC ;8BC A460A38=60=HBD1B4@D4=C4=E8A>=<4=C0;3>2D<4=CB?D1;82=>C824B?D1;82740A8=6B0=3=>C824B >534C4A<8=0C8>=5>AC78B?A>942C )4=30;;2><<D=820C8>=BC> >;34=)C0C4
=E8A>=<4=C0;!DBC824
;;80=24& % >G

>A>=0

)8=24A4;H

0AH>
;D<>;;8=B>""&
350 SACRAMENTO, Suite 116 - BREATHE BUILDING, 909 12th St., Sacramento PO Box 16167, Sacramento, CA 95816 − https://350sacramento.org − [email protected] April 2, 2025
Scott Johnson, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
City of Sacramento
300 Richards Blvd Third Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
Via email only: [email protected]
Dear Mr. Johnson
AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL FEIR: COMMENTS
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the March 2025 Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) / Sacramento City Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Airport South Industrial Project (ASI). We do not believe that the FEIR adequately responded to previous comments, as follows.
350 Comment 11-11. 350 commented that the DEIR does not address conflicts with specified City GP policies. The FEIR’s response cites to the DEIR, Impact 4.9.3 and Table 4.9.7.

DEIR Impact 4.9.3 asserts, “The determination that the project is consistent or inconsistent with the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan policies or other City plans and policies is ultimately the decision of the City Council”.

This is unhelpful. Of course, lead agency decision-makers are ultimately responsible for determining project consistency, but it is the responsibility of the EIR to provide them the information needed to inform that decision. This the FEIR fails to do because:
• Cumulative Impacts. Other than now partially acknowledging 350’s concerns as an area of controversy, the EIR ignores the gist of 350 comments 11-1 -11-9 as “not specifically address[ing] the adequacy of the Draft EIR”. Those comments discuss the cumulative and precedential effects of ASI’s proposed over-ride of the County’s “ultimate” USB growth boundary. Breaking the decades-long precedent will certainly facilitate the similar boundary transgressions needed for two major residential projects now pending - Upper West Side and Grandpark, approval of which would involve highly significant environmental impacts. The FEIR fails to acknowledge or substantively respond to that concern,
• Policy Conflicts. Neither DEIR Impact 4.9.3 or Table 4.9.7 cited in the FEIR’s responses to our comments, include reference to the environmentally protective policies identified in 350’s DEIR comment, i.e., LUP 1.1, “conserve open space, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and improve air quality”; and LUP 1-11, “implement conservation plans, preserve farmland and protect critical habitat outside the city”. The DEIR merely states broadly that general plan amendments would be needed to approve the project, without specifying for public and decision-maker review, the environmental policies that the City would have to vacate, failing its informational purpose.
350 Sacramento, April 2, 2025 Page
LAFCO-Sac City, ASI FEIR
2 Response to Comment 13-14. The FEIR response states the ASIP build-put, “could expose sensitive receptors to excess concentrations of DPM … Mitigation Measure 4.3-3… requires completion of a Health Risk Assessment … [and] requires a qualified air quality consultant to identify measures …to reduce… health risks”.

Pursuant to 14 CCR §15126.4(a)(1)(B), proposed Measure 4.3.3 constitutes impermissible deferral of identifying means of mitigation because it does not adopt specific performance standards that the mitigation would achieve; and does not substantiate the feasibility of the proposed mitigation (“relocation of loading docks to further than 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors, electrification of the heavy-duty truck fleet, and/or other options”).

Thank you very much for considering our comments.

Sincerely,
Lesley Cummings
350 Sacramento CAP Team
‘
Oscar Balaguer, Chair
350 Sacramento CAP Team
cc: Liaisons: ECOS, SCC, SCL, Sierra Club,
From: Pete Sheehan
To: Scott Johnson
Cc: Pete Sheehan
Subject: Fw: GSEJA Public Comment Airport South Industrial Project Planning Commission Public Hearing 5-22-25 Date: Monday, May 19, 2025 3:39:52 PM
Attachments: 2024 City of Sacramento Airport South Industrial Project.pdf 2025 GSEJA Airport South Industrial Project .pdf
Subject: GSEJA Public Comment Airport South Industrial Project Planning Commission Public Hearing 5- 22-25
To Whom It May Concern,
Attached and below are public comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. These comments are submitted to the Sacramento Planning Commission to be included for the record regarding the Airport South Industrial Project Public Hearing
For clarification purposes, only the highlighted yellow portion of the body of this email is the public comment to be added into the record along with the TWO attachments.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Public Comment
Good evening, my name is Pete Sheehan and I’m with the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. We submitted a comment letter to the EIR. Our letter identified several deficiencies with the EIR.

During these turbulent times, we as citizens expect and deserve our local government’s elected and appointed officials to protect us from environmental and social injustice, to aid in the preservation and rehabilitation of the environment in which we all share, and to ensure accountability and responsibility regarding the environmental decisions they may make.

We stand by our comment letter and believe the EIR is flawed, and must be redrafted and recirculated for public review. In closing we call on this commission to be a leader on the aforementioned issues and be the first line of defense for our citizenry and environment. Only by working together can we continue to be excellent stewards of our environment, outstanding stewards to our citizens and each other. Thank You.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Thank You,
Pete Sheehan
Green Jobs &Clean Communities
ies

Page 1 of 2 ends

May 22, 2025
Sacramento Planning Commission
915 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
The Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance presented multiple argumentsin our comment letter dated July 16, 2024, addressing the flaws of the EIR.

The proposed Project may exacerbate disproportionate health risks for community members within the immediate area, a concern underscored by the mandates of SB 1000. SB 1000, enacted to address environmental justice considerations, require local governments to integrate environmental justice elements into their planning processes, particularly focusing on reducing health risks for communities.

The Sacramento Planning Commission has a duty to adequately address the environmental, social, and economic burden placed on the City of Sacramento residents. The Planning Commission should recommend a new EIR be prepared for this project, due to the deficiencies of the EIR and continued health, exposures, socioeconomic factors and environmental effects the citizenry of the City of Sacramento already suffers and will continue to suffer, based on our comment letter dated July 16, 2024, along with several other comments provided by others participating in the process.

If the Planning Commission votes to recommend certification of the EIR, GSEJA believes the Planning Commission will have not fulfilled its duty to adequately investigate nor mitigate the project.

Further, under CEQA, the Planning Commission must “Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise.” The California Environmental Quality Act's purpose in properly applying the law and its intent is defined below by the California Legislature in passing CEQA.

The importance of a healthy environment for all of California’s residents isreflected in CEQA’s purpose. In passing CEQA, the Legislature determined:

CEQA’s Purposes
• “The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern.” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000, subd. (a).) Green Jobs &Clean Communities
ies

Page 2 of 2 ends

• We must “identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds from being reached.” (Id. atsubd. (d).)
• “[M]ajor consideration [must be] given to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian.” (Id. at subd. (g).)
• We must “[t]ake all action necessary to provide the people of thisstate with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise.” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21001, subd. (b).) Cities, counties, and other local governmental entities have an important role to play in ensuring environmental justice for all of California’s residents. Understate law: “[E]nvironmental justice” means the fair treatment of people of allraces, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.

Gov. Code, § 65040.12, subd. (e).) Fairness in this context means that the benefits of a healthy environment should be available to everyone, and the burdens of pollution should not be focused on sensitive populations or on communitiesthat already are experiencing its adverse effects.

We encourage the Planning Commission to adopt a net-zero goal for GHG emissions for this project, as other cities have within California with mixed – use projects larger than this one.

CONCLUSION
Due to the above-mentioned reasons as well asthe reasonslisted in the original commentletter to the EIR, GSEJA believesthe EIR is flawed and a new EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. GSEJA requeststhe Planning Commission to not approve the project and request a new EIR.

Sincerely,
Pete Sheehan
Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
1265 West Shaw Ave. Suite 100
Fresno, CA 93711

BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

AON CENTER
707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 4880
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 (213) 572-
0400
July 16, 2024
Scott Johnson VIA EMAIL TO:

Senior Planner [email protected]
Community Development Department
300 Richards Boulevard, Third Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
Subject: Comments on Airport South Industrial Project EIR (SCH NO. 2022030181) Dear Mr. Johnson,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Airport South Industrial Project. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

1.0 Summary
The proposed project would include the development of an industrial park within an approximately 353.5-acre portion of the project site, located immediately south of Bayou Way. The industrial park would allow for construction of up to 5,204,500 square feet (sf) of industrial uses on approximately 235.6 acres, as well as approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses, including approximately 73,400 sf of hotel/hospitality, on approximately 13.4 acres. Throughout the EIR, the term “industrial park” is used as an umbrella term for the proposed industrial and retail/highway commercial uses. Thus, unless a distinction between the proposed industrial and retail/highway commercial uses is specifically defined, the term “industrial park” can be assumed to incorporate both of the foregoing uses.

Parcels 6A through 6C and 7A through 7C are proposed retail/highway commercial uses generally situated south of the intersection of I-5 and Metro Air Parkway. Parcels 1 through 4, all planned for industrial use, generally surround the proposed retail/highway commercial uses. Parcel 5, the remaining proposed industrial use, would be located in the northeast corner of the site. The project Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 2 ends

site also includes several nonparticipating parcels, comprised of approximately 83 acres, and would result in first tier entitlements for future industrial uses of approximately 1,404,800 sf.

Industrial Uses
The total estimated square footage of industrial buildings would be 5,204,500 sf within five parcels totaling 235.6 acres. The area of each of the aforementioned parcels and associated warehouse buildings would be as follows:

Parcel 1: 47.7 acres, 979,400-sf building;
Parcel 2: 53.4 acres, 1,335,200-sf building;
Parcel 3: 34.4 acres, 772,900-sf building;
Parcel 4: 54.7 acres, 1,335,200-sf building; and
Parcel 5: 45.4 acres, 781,800-sf building.

Commercial Uses
The commercial component of the proposed project would include six lots comprised of approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses, including approximately 73,400 sf of hotel/hospitality, on approximately 13.4 acres. All six retail/highway commercial lots would be clustered south of the intersection of I-5 and Metro Air Parkway, near the center of the project site.

The area of each of the aforementioned parcels and associated commercial buildings would be as follows:

Parcel 6A: 2.1 acres, 3,900-sf restaurant building;
Parcel 6B: 1.5 acres, 3,900-sf restaurant building;
Parcel 6C: 3.0 acres, 8,100-sf fueling station/carwash; Parcel 7A: 4.0 acres, 73,400-sf hotel building;
Parcel 7B: 1.5 acres, 3,900-sf restaurant building; and Parcel 7C: 1.3 acres, 5,000-sf restaurant building.

Nonparticipating Parcels
The proposed project includes several nonparticipating parcels comprised of approximately 83 acres, which would receive first-tier entitlements, such as the proposed SOI Amendment to amend the City of Sacramento SOI and Annexation of the site into the City limits and SacSewer service area, for future industrial uses of approximately 1,404,800 sf. These future development areas include six existing parcels controlled by separate owners, which are summarized as follows:

Parcel 8: 64.3 acres (Cayocca);
Parcel 9: 6.5 acres (Campbell);
Parcel 10: 4.6 acres (Isgur Trust); and
Parcel 11: 0.7-acre (Patel).

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 3 ends

Discretionary actions required to approve the proposed project include:

1. LAFCo approval of a Sphere of Influence (SOI) Amendment to amend the City of Sacramento SOI.

2. LAFCo approval of Annexation of the project site into the City limits and SacSewer service area.

3. City of Sacramento approval of a General Plan Amendment of the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan to include the boundaries of the industrial park footprint and nonparticipating parcels (total of 414.3 acres – not including roadways) as Employment Mixed-Use.

4. City of Sacramento approval of a Prezoning of 317.9 acres (not including roadways) to M-1- PUD and 13.4 acres (not including roadways) to HC-PUD for the industrial park portion of the site, and 83 acres to M-1 for the nonparticipating parcels.

5. City of Sacramento approval of a PUD (Schematic Plan and PUD Guidelines).

6. City of Sacramento approval of a Tentative Master Parcel Map.

7. City of Sacramento approval of a Development Agreement.

8. City of Sacramento approval of a Finance Plan.

9. County of Sacramento approval of a Property Tax Exchange Agreement.

3.0 Project Description
The EIR does not include a floor plan, detailed site plan, or a conceptual grading plan. The basic components of a Planning Application include a detailed site plan, floor plan, conceptual grading plan, written narrative, and detailed elevations. The site plan provided in Figure 3-3: Site Plan has been edited for public review to remove meaningful information. Figure 3-3 excludes all of the key notes, legend, and important site data such as parking and site coverage. Notably, even though the Executive Summary states that the EIR provides a project-specific analysis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 for all areas except the non-participating parcels, Figure 3-3: Site Plan does not include any useful information that would be utilized for analysis, such as the location of the truck/trailer loading docks, passenger car parking spaces, and truck/trailer parking spaces. All of these basic items are necessary to conduct any type of analysis, and the EIR is inadequate as an informational document as it is not possible to ascertain any meaningful analysis based upon the information provided.

There are also no architectural building elevations provided. The renderings included in Figure

4.1-6 through 4.1-8 do not provide the height of the buildings, paint colors, or building materials.

The EIR has also excluded a grading plan from public review. The EIR states that “Approximately 304,000 cubic yards of soil would be imported during grading,” yet there is no method for the public to verify this claim. Providing the grading plan and earthwork quantity notes is vital as this directly informs the quantity of necessary truck hauling trips due to soil import/export during the Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 4 ends

grading phase of construction. A revised EIR must be prepared to include wholly accurate and unedited detailed floor plan, grading plan, site plan, and project narrative for public review.

Further, the EIR is inadequate as it does not provide detailed information regarding the requests associated with each of the discretionary actions. For example, the EIR briefly lists a few of the requests associated with the M-1 and HC PUD, but has excluded the PUD Schematic Plan and PUD Guidelines from public review. The project also requires discretionary approval of a Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Property Tax Exchange Agreement, none of which are included for public review as part of the EIR. This does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the complete PUD Schematic Plan, PUD Guidelines, Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Property Tax Exchange Agreement contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the complete PUD Schematic Plan, PUD Guidelines, Tentative Master Parcel Map, Development Agreement, Finance Plan, and Property Tax Exchange Agreement for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The EIR states that, “the western portion of the project site is located within Safety Zone 3, which is designated Inner Turning Zone”, the south-central portion of the site is located within Safety Zone 4, which is designated Outer Approach/Departure Zone”, and the eastern portion of the project site is located within Safety Zone 6, which is designated Traffic Pattern Zone”” of the Sacramento International Airport LUCP1. The EIR concludes the project will have less than significant impacts because, “all future uses would be required to comply with the criteria for conditional uses, as shown in Table 2 of the ALUCP, to ensure safety compatibility with the Sacramento International Airport.” The EIR does not provide any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding. The EIR is misleading to the public and decision makers by excluding information regarding the statutorily required review by SACOG ALUC. The proposed project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the project site.

Prior to the amendment of a General Plan, the ALUC shall review the plan, ordinance, or regulation for consistency with the ALUCP (PUC Section 21676(b))2. While the Project Description of the 1 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/1754/638376327338000000 2 California Airport Planning Land Use Handbook Section 1.3.4. ALUC Review https://dot.ca.gov/- /media/dot-media/programs/aeronautics/documents/californiaairportlanduseplanninghandbook-a11y.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 5 ends

EIR states that SACOG ALUC review is required, it is excluded from analysis within this section.

The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as the project does not comply with PUC Section 21676(b).

Notably, the Land Use and Planning analysis states that, “on July 27. 2023, SACOG prepared an ALUC Preliminary Review to determine the proposed project s compatibility with the SMF ALUCP,” and SACOG provided conditions of approval. However, the SACOG ALUC Preliminary Review and conditions of approval are not included for public review, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the SACOG ALUC Preliminary Review and conditions of approval contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the SACOG ALUC Preliminary Review and conditions of approval for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

4.9 Land Use and Planning/Population and Housing
It must first be noted that the proposed project is not consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Employment Mixed Use. The City’s General Plan states that the Employment Mixed Use designation, "is intended to buffer residential uses from more intense industrial and service commercial activities and to provide compatible employment uses near higher-density and mixed-use housing. This designation provides for a range of light industrial and high technology uses.” The industrial portion of the project is exclusively warehousing and distribution, which is an intense segment of the broad light industrial category that involves high rates of truck trips. The project is consistent with the Industrial Mixed Use designation, which “provides for manufacturing, warehousing, and other employment-generating uses that may produce loud noise or odors and tend to have a high volume of truck traffic.” However, the Industrial Mixed Use designation, “should not be located next to a residential neighborhood without substantial buffers (i.e., office uses, regional parks, greenways, or open space),” meaning that it should not be applied to the project site even though it is the appropriate land use designation for the proposed warehousing and distribution aspect of the project. The EIR must be revised to include this information for analysis and include a finding of significance as the proposed project is not consistent with the Employment Mixed Use designation.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 6 ends

The project faces significant inconsistencies with statutory requirements of the Housing Crisis Act (HCA) of 2019/Senate Bill (SB) 3303/SB 84. The HCA/SB 330/SB 8 require replacement housing sites when land designated for housing development experience land use changes to ensure no net loss of housing capacity. The EIR states that, “based on the existing Sacramento County General Plan land use and zoning designations for the project site, residential development was not anticipated at the project site.” However, this statement is erroneous and misleading to the public and decision makers and must be replaced with factual information as part of a revised EIR. The project site has an existing Sacramento County Land Use Element designation of Agricultural Cropland5, which “allows single family dwelling units at a density no greater than 40 acres per unit.” Therefore, the 474.4 acre project site has an existing residential development capacity of 11 dwelling units.

Government Code Section 66300(b)(1)(A) requires that agencies shall not change the general plan land use designation, specific plan land use designation, or zoning to a less intensive use below what was allowed under the land use designation and zoning ordinances in effect at the time of the proposed change.” Under Government Code Section 66300(b)(1)(A), a less intensive use” includes, but is not limited to, reductions to height, density, or floor area ratio, new or increased open space or lot size requirements, or new or increased setback requirements, minimum frontage requirements, or maximum lot coverage limitations, or any other action that would individually or cumulatively reduce residential development capacity. Pursuant to SB 330, replacement capacity for any displaced residential units must be provided concurrently at the time of project approval.

Government Code Section 66300 (h)(i)(1) states that, “this section does not prohibit an affected county or an affected city, including the local electorate acting through the initiative process, from changing a land use designation or zoning ordinance to a less intensive use, or reducing the intensity of land use, if the city or county concurrently changes the development standards, policies, and conditions applicable to other parcels within the jurisdiction to ensure that there is no net loss in residential capacity.” As calculated above, the project site’s Sacramento County Land Use Element designation of Agricultural Cropland provides development capacity for 11 residential units. Adoption of the proposed SOI Amendment, General Plan Amendment, and Prezoning as part of the proposed project will result in a reduction of the existing residential development capacity by 11 units to a decreased development capacity of 0 residential units. 3 Housing Crisis Act of 2019/SB 330
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB330 4 SB 8 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB8 5 https://planning.saccounty.gov/Documents/B12.%20Land%20Use%20Element%20Amended%2012-13-

22.pdf
Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 7 ends

This is in conflict with SB 8 that expanded the provisions of the HCA to include Government Code Section 66300 (h)(i)(1) requiring concurrent approval of replacement sites to ensure no net loss in residential capacity, and Section 66300 (h)(2)(A) defining concurrently” to mean the action is approved at the same meeting of the legislative body. The EIR has not identified replacement sites for the net loss in residential capacity for 11 units as a result of project implementation. The loss in residential capacity must be included as a finding of significance as part of a revised EIR. The EIR does not act in conformance with the HCA/SB 330/SB 8 and the lost zoning capacity of any dwelling units is a significant environmental impact in violation of the HCA/SB 330/SB 8. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this inconsistency.

Additionally, deferring the environmental analysis of construction and operation of replacement sites to a later date is project piecemealing in violation of CEQA. The EIR does not accurately or adequately describe the project, meaning the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment” (CEQA § 15378). The whole of the action must statutorily and legally include the identification of replacement sites and all associated actions required to implement development of at least 11 residential units.

Table 4.9-6 Discussion of Relevant Sacramento LAFCo Policies provides erroneous and misleading consistency analysis. For example, the EIR concludes the project is consistent with “LAFCo Policy I(6): Amendment proposals involving Sphere expansion which contain prime agricultural land will not be approved by the LAFCo if there is sufficient alternative land available for annexation within the existing Sphere of Influence,” by citing analysis that, “an alternate location within the City is not currently available to serve the proposed project,” and “buildout of the site on alternative land outside, but adjacent to, the City s SOI would likely result in similar conversion of Farmland as the proposed project, given the prevalence of agricultural land adjacent to the City s SOI.” The EIR discusses land outside the SOI and land within the incorporated City limits. The EIR has not provided any analysis of the issue identified in Policy I(6), which regards alternative land within the existing Sphere of Influence. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as it has not provided any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding.

The proposed project requests approval of a PUD (Schematic Plan and PUD Guidelines) for the both the M-1 and HC areas. The EIR states that, “the PUD Guidelines developed for the project site include design standards for site design, building design, landscaping, signage, and lighting.” However, the complete PUD guidelines are not included for public review, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 8 ends

(CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the complete PUD guidelines contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the complete PUD guidelines for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

The EIR concludes that, “the proposed project would be consistent with the City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan and Planning and Development Code.” However, the EIR has not provided any meaningful evidence to support this claim. For example, the proposed convenience store associated with the gas station/car wash is 8,100 square feet (per Appendix N Traffic Impact Analysis), while Sacramento Municipal Code Section 17.224.410 (HC zone—Permitted uses) limits retail stores to 5,000 square feet in size. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as the proposed project does not comply with the Sacramento Municipal Code.

The EIR states that, “the determination of significance is based on whether population growth associated with a project has been previously planned for, and whether such growth could result in indirect impacts from associated development.” It is clear that the proposed project has not previously been planned for urban development as it is designated for Agricultural uses by the County of Sacramento and is outside the City of Sacramento’s Sphere of Influence area. Impacts will result from development of the proposed project, including significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable impacts to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

The EIR also utilizes uncertain language and does not provide any meaningful analysis or supporting evidence to substantiate the conclusion that there will be no significant impacts to population and housing. For example, the EIR states that, "while the project could indirectly attract residents to the area for employment opportunities, new employees would likely be drawn from current residents in the surrounding area,” and the geographic boundaries of the “surrounding area” are undefined. Relying on the entire labor force within an undefined distance, notably the greater SACOG region, to fill the project’s construction and operational jobs will increase rates of VMT and emissions during all phases of construction and operations and an EIR must be prepared to account for longer worker trip distances. This uncertain language is not supported by any information such as the current unemployment rates in the City/County or evidence that the unemployed population is qualified for or interested in work in the industrial sector. The EIR must Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 9 ends

be revised to include a finding of significance as it has not provided any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding.

The EIR continues by stating that, "Conservatively estimating that all permanent positions associated with the project would be filled by new residents to the Sacramento region and assuming that the proposed project would be fully built out and operating at full capacity by 2035, the project s contribution to the overall population increase by 2035 would be approximately 3.5 percent (4,000 new residents ÷ 111,515 residents). Thus, the increase in jobs would be relatively small compared to the City s existing and anticipated population levels.” It must be noted that the project site is not within the incorporated City limits or the City’s Sphere of Influence and therefore was not accounted for within the 111,515 resident total, and therefore represents an increase of 4,000 new residents above the 2035 projection. The EIR has not provided any relevant analysis regarding the City’s employment projections. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG) adopted the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) on November 18, 20196. Figure 3.5:

Community Types within the 2020 MTP/SCS identifies the project site as “Land Not Identified for Development in the MTP/SCS Planning Period,” meaning that it was not included in any growth forecasting and the MTP/SCS identifies 0 growth in these areas. The MTP/SCS notes that the Established Communities in the SACOG region will add 146,053 jobs between 2016 - 2040 (Figure 3.5 Community Types and Table 3.2 Summary of Expected Housing and Employment Growth by Community Type). Utilizing the EIR’s calculation of 4,000 employees, the project represents a 2.7% increase above the employment growth projections from 2016 - 2040 within all of SACOG’s Established Communities. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment and/or population over 26 years represents a significant amount of growth.

A revised EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects “in the pipeline” within Established Communities in the SACOG region to determine if the project will exceed SACOG’s employment growth forecast for the Established Communities. Additionally, the revised EIR must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions in order to provide an accurate environmental analysis.

Table 4.9-7 City of Sacramento 2040 General Plan and SMF Land Use Compatibility Plan Policy Discussion does not provide a consistency analysis with all plans, policies, or regulations adopted 6 SACOG 2020 MTP/SCS https://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2020_mtp-scs.pdf?1580330993 Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 10 ends

for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The project has significant potential to conflict with many of these items applicable to the project site, including but not limited to the following from the City General Plan:

1. Goal LUP-1 A compact urban footprint and sustainable development pattern with infrastructure that supports efficient delivery of public services while protecting surrounding open space lands.

2. LUP-1.1 Compact Urban Footprint. The City shall promote a land- and resource-efficient development pattern and the placement of infrastructure to support efficient delivery of public services and conserve open space, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and improve air quality.

3. LUP-1.8 Jobs-Housing Balance. The City shall encourage a balance between job type, the workforce, and housing development to reduce the negative impacts of long commutes and provide a range of employment opportunities for all city residents.

4. LUP-1.11 Coordinate to Protect Farmland. The City shall continue to work with Sacramento County and other adjacent jurisdictions to implement conservation plans, preserve farmland and protect critical habitat outside the city.

5. LUP-4.6 Compatibility with Adjoining Uses. The City shall ensure that the introduction of higher-intensity mixed-use development along major arterial corridors is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring features such as the following:

Buildings set back from rear or side yard property lines adjoining single-unit dwelling residential uses; Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses to maintain appropriate transitions in scale and to minimize impacts to privacy and solar access; Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas to the degree feasible; or Lighting shielded from view and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses.

6. LUP-4.8 Buildings that Engage the Street. The City shall require that buildings be oriented to actively engage and enhance the public realm through techniques such as building orientation, build-to and setback lines, façade articulation, ground-floor transparency, and location of parking.

7. LUP-4.9 Enhanced Pedestrian Environment. The City shall require the design of sidewalks in commercial and mixed-use areas to promote walkability and pedestrian activity, with widths wide enough to provide for free and clear pedestrian use, activation of building frontages with displays, landscaping, and seating areas for cafes and restaurants.

8. LUP-4.11 Shared Parking, Driveways, and Alley Access. The City shall encourage the creation of shared parking areas and shared vehicular driveways for access along arterial Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 11 ends

corridors to minimize the number of driveways and curb cuts. The City should also encourage the use of adjacent alleys for vehicular access.

9. LUP-4.12 Drive-Through Restaurants. The City shall prohibit new drive-through restaurants within: ½-mile walking distance from the center of an existing light rail station platform or high-frequency transit stop; and ¼-mile walking distance from the center of a proposed light rail station.

10. LUP-4.13 Future-Ready Gas Stations. The City shall prohibit the establishment of new gas stations or the expansion of new fossil fuel infrastructure at existing gas stations unless the project proponent provides 50kW or greater Direct Current Fast Charger (DCFC) electric vehicle charging stations on site at a ratio of at least 1 new charging station per 1 new gas fuel nozzle.

11. Goal LUP-7 Industrial opportunities in suitable locations to provide employment for Sacramento residents and promote inclusive economic growth in the city.

12. LUP-8.5 Development Adjacent to Freeways and Railroad Corridors. The City shall promote high-quality design of buildings along freeway and railway corridors, including promoting techniques such as the following: Requiring extensive landscaping and trees along the freeway fronting elevation in consultation with City staff, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, and Caltrans; Establishing a consistent building line, articulating and modulating building elevations and heights, and varying the use of materials and color to create visual interest; and Including design elements that reduce noise and provide for filtering, ventilation, and exhaust of vehicle air emissions.

13. LUP-8.9 People-Friendly Design. The City shall require people-friendly design to be incorporated into buildings and spaces, including elements and features such as the following:

Human scale, tree-shaded pedestrian passageways; Resting areas; Seating; Gathering places; and Other measures with demonstrated benefits for health and quality of life.

14. LUP-8.10 Responsiveness to Context. The City shall require building and site design that respects and responds to the local context, including use of local materials and plant species where feasible, responsiveness to Sacramento s climate, and consideration of cultural and historic context of Sacramento s neighborhoods, corridors, and centers.

15. LUP-8.11 Neighborhood and Transitions. The City shall ensure that development standards facilitate transitions between areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their own unique qualities.

16. Goal LUP-11 Create built and natural environments within the city that prioritize, support, promote, and embrace social equity, ecological regeneration, responsible resource stewardship, and human health and well-being.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 12 ends

17. LUP-11.8 Construction Processes. The City shall encourage onsite construction processes that reduce environmental harm and support sustainable methods.

18. M-1.15 Improve Walking Connectivity. The City shall require new subdivisions, new multiunit dwelling developments, and new developments along commercial corridors to include well-lit, tree-shaded walkways where feasible, that provide direct links to the public realm or adjacent public destinations such as transit stops and stations, schools, parks, and shopping centers.

19. M-2.16 Shared Parking. Through the development review process, the City shall encourage project applicants proposing duplex, multi-unit, mixed use, and non-residential projects to first explore shared-use of existing parking spaces that can be available for dual uses before proposing to construct new parking facilities.

20. M-3.3 Traffic. The City shall support planning and managing traffic from the perspective of the adjacent uses, using traffic management and traffic calming techniques.

21. M-4.7 Integrated Goods Movement. The City shall work to ensure that the goods movement sector is integrated with the rest of the transportation system in such a way that does not endanger the health and safety of residents and other roadway users.

22. Goal EJ-1 Clean air, water, and soil with no segment of the community disproportionately burdened by environment conditions.

23. EJ-2.9 Urban Agriculture in New Development. The City shall promote rooftop gardens, edible gardens, and other sustainable agricultural landscaping alternatives within multi-unit, commercial, and industrial developments.

24. EJ-2.15 Limit Unhealthy Food Establishments. The City shall explore mechanisms to limit unhealthy food establishments, especially in disadvantaged communities (DACs) and historically underserved areas.

25. EJ-2.16 Discourage Unhealthy Uses. The City should discourage the establishment of new drive-through restaurants, alcohol permits for off-site sales, and tobacco sales points near food deserts, schools, and pedestrian priority areas.

26. Goal ERC-9 Climate leadership and bold action to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045, aggressively reduce emissions by 2030, and increase climate resilience communitywide.

27. ERC-9.1 Communitywide GHG Reduction. The City shall implement the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), a qualified greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction plan that meets the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15183.5(b), to reduce community and municipal emissions consistent with the state s GHG reduction goals.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 13 ends

28. E-1.2 Business Attraction and Expansion. The City should endeavor to focus business attraction and retention/expansion efforts on emerging industries in the region that demonstrate strong growth potential and pay higher than average wages.

29. Guiding Principle 1: Concentrate new growth within Sacramento s existing footprint to promote a compact development pattern that supports efficient delivery of public services and infrastructure, while protecting surrounding open space lands.

30. Guiding Principle 2: Link new growth with access to high-frequency transit in order to optimize public investments and support an accessible, convenient network that offers a viable alternative to the automobile and promotes public health.

31. Guiding Principle 6: Make Sacramento a model of sustainable living by promoting environmentally conscious, health promoting, and age-friendly design of buildings, parks and infrastructure, as well as by promoting the adaptive reuse of existing buildings and the careful conservation of energy, water, open spaces, trees, and other natural resources.

32. Guiding Principle 7: Take bold action to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 and become a leading voice in the effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change.

33. Guiding Principle 9: Facilitate the use of innovative approaches, new technologies, and economic development to dramatically reduce per capita energy use, waste, and pollutants.

The EIR must also be revised to remove misleading and erroneous consistency analysis for several items. For example, the EIR concludes the project is consistent with “LUP-1.13 Airport Land Use Compatibility. The City shall work with the Sacramento County Airport System (SCAS) and the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) to ensure that new development near the area s airports is compatible with airport operations, adopted ALUC policies, and applicable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans,” because “based on the analysis presented throughout this EIR, the proposed project would be compatible with airport operations, adopted ALUC policies, and applicable ALUC Plans.” However, the EIR does not provide any meaningful evidence to support a less than significant finding. The EIR is misleading to the public and decision makers by excluding information regarding the statutorily required review by SACOG ALUC. The proposed project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the project site. Prior to the amendment of a General Plan, the ALUC shall review the plan, ordinance, or regulation for consistency with the ALUCP (PUC Section 21676(b))7. While the Project Description of the EIR states that SACOG ALUC review is required, it is excluded from analysis within this section. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance as the project does not comply with PUC Section 21676(b) and the above City of Sacramento General Plan policy. 7 California Airport Planning Land Use Handbook Section 1.3.4. ALUC Review https://dot.ca.gov/- /media/dot-media/programs/aeronautics/documents/californiaairportlanduseplanninghandbook-a11y.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 14 ends

The EIR also concludes that the proposed project is consistent with, “M-2.3 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric. Consistent with state law, the City shall evaluate transportation California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts using vehicle miles traveled or other metrics as determined by the City, and shall not rely on automobile delay, as described by level of service or similar measures of vehicular delay as a measure of environmental significance. Local Transportation Analyses (LTA) shall continue to be required when necessary to aid in conditioning project entitlements for needed operational improvements.” The EIR states that because, “the proposed project does not include any retail uses in excess of 50,000 sf. Therefore, the highway commercial uses are considered to be local-serving retail, and consistent with OPR guidance, would result in a less-than-significant impact related to VMT.” This analysis excludes the proposed hotel located on the Highway Commercial parcels. The proposed hotel is not a local serving use and is 73,400 square feet. Therefore, this attempted exemption from VMT analysis does not apply and a finding of significance must be made as part of a revised EIR. The EIR continues by stating that, “the on-site industrial uses are anticipated to generate VMT at 128 percent of the regional average, which is above the significance threshold established for the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure 4.12-3, which requires that the owner/operator of on-site industrial building prepare and implement a VMT Reduction Plan to reduce VMT by at least 22 percent prior to the certificate of occupancy, consistent with the VMT Mitigation Memorandum prepared by the City s Public Works Department for the proposed project.” However, it is not possible for the City to ensure that MM 4.12-3 will result in reduced VMT by project employees and be implemented continuously, at all times, throughout the life of the project and maintain a VMT reduction to less than significant levels at all times. The efficacy of the proposed mitigation measures and reduction of VMT impacts below the applicable thresholds cannot be assured, and the project’s VMT impact is therefore considered significant and unavoidable. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because there is no possible assurance of the percentage of project employees that would utilize non-automobile or non-single occupant vehicle travel associated with the mitigation measures and mitigation of the project’s VMT impact to less than significant is not feasible.

The EIR also concludes the project is consistent with, “ERC-4.7 Operational Emissions. The City shall require development projects that exceed Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) reactive organic gas (ROG) and nitrogen oxide (NOX) operational thresholds to incorporate design or operational features that reduce emissions equal to 15 percent from the level that would be produced by an unmitigated project,” because, “An AQMP was prepared, as required by Mitigation Measure 4.3-2, and includes all feasible measures to reduce emissions during project operations, including the prohibition of natural gas, participation in a TMA, use of Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 15 ends

zero-emission forklifts, use of zero emission vehicles in three percent of the heavy-duty vehicle fleet, and the provision of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure.” This analysis does not provide any information regarding quantity of mitigation and a finding of significance must be made as part of a revised EIR.

The EIR has not provided any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the City’s 2040 General Plan.
states that the Employment Mixed Use

4.12 Transportation
The EIR sources the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) 2018 CEQA Guidelines Technical Advisory9 in its VMT analysis. For the Highway Commercial uses, the EIR states that according to OPR, “the potential for VMT impacts, according to this approach, hinges on whether the project can be considered local-serving or regional. By adding retail opportunities within existing neighborhoods, local-serving retail projects can shorten trips and reduce overall VMT. In contrast, regional destination retail projects would draw customers from larger trade areas, potentially substituting for shorter trips and increasing VMT. The OPR guidance suggests that any 8 https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-ImpactReports/2040-gpu-and-caap/Sacramento-2040-Project-MEIR-8242023.pdf 9 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA https://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/20190122-743_Technical_Advisory.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 16 ends

retail projects, including stores larger than 50,000 sf, might be considered regional serving retail.

The proposed project does not include any retail uses in excess of 50,000 sf. Therefore, the HCPUD uses are considered to be local-serving retail, and consistent with OPR guidance, would result in a less-than-significant impact related to VMT.” However, the purpose of the OPR Technical Advisory document is purely advisory, stating in its introduction:
“The purpose of this document is to provide advice and recommendations, which agencies and other entities may use at their discretion. This document does not alter lead agency discretion in preparing environmental documents subject to CEQA. This document should not be construed as legal advice.”
The OPR document is not a legal interpretation, court decision, or amendment to the CEQA statute that provides a substitute threshold of significance. Most notably, the EIR’s analysis excludes the proposed hotel located on the Highway Commercial parcels. The proposed hotel is not a local serving use and is 73,400 square feet. Therefore, even utilizing the EIR’s attempted logic for an exemption from VMT analysis does not apply and a finding of significance must be made as part of a revised EIR.

Although the EIR concludes, “the on-site industrial uses are anticipated to generate VMT at 128 percent of the regional average, which is above the significance threshold established for the proposed project,” it has still underreported the quantity of VMT generated by the project’s industrial uses. The EIR excludes trips made by medium and heavy duty trucks/trailers from VMT analysis. The VMT analysis relies upon the OPR 2018 CEQA Guidelines Technical Advisory and its statement that, “‘vehicle miles traveled’ refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project,” where automobile refers to passenger vehicles, specifically cars and light trucks,” (which is the OPR interpretation of PRC Section 15064.3) to conclude that the project will have less than significant impacts. The OPR document is not a legal interpretation, court decision, or amendment to the CEQA statute that clarifies the definition of automobile. The term “automobile” is not defined in the CEQA statute and application of the OPR interpretation is speculative and does not provide an analysis of the “worst-case scenario” for environmental impacts. Widespread public understanding and perception indicates that trucks, including medium/heavy-duty truck/trailer trips associated with the industrial nature of warehouse operations, are automobiles. An EIR must be prepared to include all truck/trailer and operational delivery van activity for quantified VMT analysis. The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of truck/trailer and delivery van VMT due to traveling from large regional distribution centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees arrive at the industrial buildings for work, they will conduct their jobs by driving truck/trailer/delivery vans across the region as part of the daily operations as a warehouse, which Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 17 ends

will drastically increase project-generated VMT. The project’s truck/trailer/delivery van activity is unable to utilize public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to exclude this activity from VMT analysis. A revised EIR must be prepared to reflect a quantified VMT analysis that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity to adequately and accurately analyze the potentially significant project transportation impacts.

The EIR provides Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 to mitigate impacts to less than significant levels:
“Prior to the certificate of occupancy for each on-site industrial building, the owner/operator of each building shall be required to prepare and implement a VMT Reduction Plan that includes a sufficient selection of CAPCOA Trip Reduction Programs (T-6 through T-13) to reduce VMT by at least 22 percent, consistent with the VMT Mitigation Memorandum prepared by the City’s Public Works Department for the proposed project (see Appendix Q to the EIR). CAPCOA Trip Reduction Programs T-6 through T-13 include measures such as implementing a commute trip reduction program and/or marketing, providing a rideshare program, implementing a subsidized or discounted transit program, providing end-of-trip bicycle facilities, providing employersponsored vanpool, pricing workplace housing, and implementing employee parking cash-out. The VMT Reduction Plan shall be submitted to the City’s Department of Public Works and Community Development Department for review and approval.”
Notably, the EIR has not provided meaningful evidence to support the conclusion that Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 will reduce VMT by 22%. Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 is unenforceable mitigation in violation of CEQA § 21081.6 (b). It is not possible for the City to ensure that Mitigation Measure 4.12-3 will result in reduced VMT by project employees and be implemented continuously, at all times, throughout the life of the project and maintain a VMT reduction to less than significant levels at all times. The efficacy of the proposed mitigation measures and reduction of VMT impacts below the applicable thresholds cannot be assured, and the project’s VMT impact is therefore considered significant and unavoidable. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because there is no possible assurance of the percentage of project employees that would utilize non-automobile or non-single occupant vehicle travel associated with the mitigation measures and mitigation of the project’s VMT impact to less than significant is not feasible.

The EIR has not adequately analyzed the project’s potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project’s potential to result in inadequate emergency access. There are no exhibits adequately depicting the available maneuvering and queueing space for trucks/trailers at the intersection of the project driveways and the adjacent streets. There are also no exhibits adequately Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 18 ends

depicting the onsite turning radius available for trucks maneuvering throughout the industrial sites.

Notably, even though the Executive Summary states that the EIR provides a project-specific analysis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 for all areas except the non-participating parcels, Figure 3-3: Site Plan does not include any useful information that would be utilized for analysis, such as the location of the truck/trailer loading docks, passenger car parking spaces, and truck/trailer parking spaces. All of these items are necessary to conduct any type of basic analysis regarding geometric design features and emergency access, and the EIR is inadequate as an informational document as it is not possible to ascertain any meaningful analysis based upon the information provided. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance due to these significant and unavoidable impacts that have not been analyzed.

Additionally, the EIR has not provided any analysis of the available horizontal and vertical sight distance at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets. Sight distance is the continuous length of street ahead visible to the driver. At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. A revised EIR must be prepared with a sight distance analysis based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Stopping Sight Distance requirements.

6.2 Growth-Inducing Impacts and 6.4 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes The EIR provides erroneous and misleading analysis of the proposed project utilizing uncertain language. The EIR claims that, “because of the industrial and commercial nature of the proposed project, buildout would not directly result in an increase in population or construction of housing.” However, the EIR excludes that the proposed project is outside of the City’s SOI, meaning that it will represent a marked increase above existing growth projections. It is clear that the proposed project has not previously been planned for urban development as it is designated for Agricultural uses by the County of Sacramento and is outside the City of Sacramento’s Sphere of Influence area. Additionally, Figure 3.5: Community Types within the 2020 MTP/SCS identifies the project site as “Land Not Identified for Development in the MTP/SCS Planning Period,” meaning that it was not included in any growth forecasting and the MTP/SCS identifies 0 growth in these areas.

Impacts will result from development of the proposed project, including significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable impacts to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 19 ends

The EIR continues by stating that, “While construction of the proposed project would result in a limited increase in construction employment opportunities, construction would be temporary, and jobs would likely be filled by the local employee base.” The EIR has not provided any demographic information regarding the “local” employee base, and the geographic boundaries of the “local” employee base are undefined. There is no information regarding the available construction workforce and the EIR has not provided any meaningful evidence to support the conclusion the project will not induce growth.

The EIR also states that, “Although development of the proposed project could generate a total of approximately 4,000 employees, new employees would likely be drawn from current residents in the area. According to the City s population projections, as presented in Table 4.9-4, City of Sacramento Population Growth Projections, in Chapter 4.9, Land Use and Planning/Population and Housing, of this EIR, the population of the City of Sacramento is anticipated to increase from 2020 to 2030 by 111,515. Conservatively estimating that all permanent positions associated with the project would be filled by new residents to the Sacramento region and assuming that the proposed project would be fully built out and operating at full capacity by 2030, the project s contribution to the overall population increase by 2030 would be approximately 0.77 percent.

Thus, the increase in jobs would be relatively small compared to the City s existing and anticipated population levels. As such, the proposed project would not result in a substantial increase in permanent population and a demand for housing in the vicinity of the project site.” It must be noted that the project site is not within the incorporated City limits or the City’s Sphere of Influence and therefore was not accounted for within the 111,515 resident total, and therefore represents an increase of 4,000 new residents above the 2035 projection. The EIR has not provided any relevant analysis regarding the City’s employment projections. Since the project site was not included for analysis as an employment generating use by the City, County, or SACOG, it is represents an increase in population and employment growth that was not accounted for by any agency. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to this significant and unavoidable impact.

Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG) adopted the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) on November 18, 201910. Figure 3.5:

Community Types within the 2020 MTP/SCS identifies the project site as “Land Not Identified for Development in the MTP/SCS Planning Period,” meaning that it was not included in any growth forecasting and the MTP/SCS identifies 0 growth in these areas. The MTP/SCS notes that the Established Communities in the SACOG region will add 146,053 jobs between 2016 - 2040 (Figure 3.5 Community Types and Table 3.2 Summary of Expected Housing and Employment 10 SACOG 2020 MTP/SCS https://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2020_mtp-scs.pdf?1580330993 Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 20 ends

Growth by Community Type). Utilizing the EIR’s calculation of 4,000 employees, the project represents a 2.7% increase above the employment growth projections from 2016 - 2040 within all of SACOG’s Established Communities. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment and/or population over 26 years represents a significant amount of growth.

The EIR has not provided any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the City’s 2040 General Plan.
states that the Employment Mixed Use
11 https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-ImpactReports/2040-gpu-and-caap/Sacramento-2040-Project-MEIR-8242023.pdf Scott Johnson
July 16, 2024

Page 21 ends

7.0 Alternatives
The EIR is required to evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project which will avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project (CEQA § 15126.6.) The alternatives chosen for analysis include the CEQA required “No Project/No Build” alternative and only two others - 20 Percent Electric Fleet Alternative and Reduced Footprint Alternative.

The EIR does not evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives as only two alternatives beyond the required No Project alternative is analyzed. The EIR must be revised to include analysis of a reasonable range of alternatives and foster informed decision making (CEQA § 15126.6). This could include alternatives such as development of the site with a project that reduces the significant and unavoidable Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, and GHG impacts to less than significant levels and a mixed-use project that provides affordable housing and local-serving commercial uses that may reduce VMT, GHG emissions, and improve Air Quality.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the EIR is flawed and a revised EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Attachments:

1. SWAPE Technical Analysis
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
July 12, 2024
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Airport South Industrial Project (SCH No. 2022030181) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the 2024 Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) for the Airport South Industrial Project (“Project”) located in the City of Sacramento (“City”). The Project proposes to construct 5,204,500-square-feet (“SF”) of industrial space, 98,200-SF of commercial space, and 3,670 vehicle parking stalls on the 353.5-acre site.

Our review concludes that the DEIR fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality and health risk impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. A revised Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The DEIR’s air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) Version 2020.4.0 (p. 4.3-37).1 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. 1 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. 2 Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose which parameters are used in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions by identifying any changes to default values.

Justifications are provided for each altered value.

When reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Results as Appendix C to the DEIR, we analyzed the “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model. This is the DEIR’s most conservative proposal of the Project, as the model both omits the potential development of the specified nonparticipating-parcels and includes Tier 4 mitigation Still, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the DEIR. As a result, the Project’s construction emissions may be underestimated. A revised EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.

Underestimated Land Use Size
Regarding the Project’s commercial space, the DEIR states:
“The commercial component of the proposed project would include six lots comprised of approximately 98,200 sf of retail/highway commercial uses, including approximately 73,400 sf of hotel/hospitality, on approximately 13.4 acres” (p. 3-8).

The model should have consequently included 73,400-SF of “Hotel” space. However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model includes only 73.40-SF of “Hotel” (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 1166, 1220, 1267).

The proposed manufacturing space is therefore underestimated by 73,326.60-SF. 2 This underestimation presents an issue, as the land use size feature is used throughout CalEEMod to determine default variable and emission factors that affect the model’s calculations. The square footage of each land use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted (i.e., volatile organic compounds emissions from architectural coatings) and volume that is heated or cooled (i.e., energy impacts).3 By underestimating the size of the proposed manufacturing space, the model underestimates 2 Calculated: (73,400-SF proposed manufacturing space) – (73.40-SF modeled manufacturing space) = 73,326.60 underestimated floor area.
3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 28. 3 the Project’s construction and operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model includes several changes to the default individual construction phase lengths (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 1167, 1168, 1221, 1222, 1268, 1269).

As a result of these changes, the model includes the following construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 1174, 1175, 1227, 1228, 1274, 1275).

The site preparation phase is therefore decreased by 72%, from the default value of 180 to 50 days; the grading phase is decreased by 35%, from the default value of 465 to 300 days; the building construction phase is decreased by 78%, from the default value of 4,650 to 1,000 days; the architectural coating phase is increased by 203%, from the default value of 330 to 1,000 days; and the paving phase is decreased by 85%, from the default value of 330 to 50 days. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified. 4 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Phase timing adjusted per applicant-provided questionnaire” (Appendix C, pp. 1166, 1220, 1267).

Regarding construction activities, the DEIR states:
“The construction modeling for the Proposed Project Scenario assumes the following based on applicant-provided project-specific data:
4 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14. 4 • Construction would begin in the year 2023;
• Construction would occur over an approximately six-year period; and • Approximately 304,000 cubic yards of soil would be imported during grading” (p. 4.3- 38).

However, the changes to the individual construction phase lengths remain unsubstantiated. While the DEIR states that the total length of Project construction would be approximately six years, or 65 months, the DEIR and associated documents fail to mention or justify the changes to individual construction phase lengths. The DEIR and associated documents also fail to provide the purported “applicantprovided questionnaire.” Until the above-mentioned construction schedule is provided, the model should have included proportionately altered individual phase lengths to match the proposed construction duration of 65 months.

The construction schedule included in the model presents an issue, as the construction emissions are improperly spread out over a longer period of time for some phases, but not for others. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, each construction phase is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below).5
By disproportionately altering and extending some of the individual construction phase lengths without proper justification, the model assumes there are a greater number of days to complete the construction activities required by the prolonged phases. As a result, there will be less construction activities required per day and, consequently, less pollutants emitted per day. Until we are able to verify the revised construction schedule, the models may underestimate the peak daily emissions associated with some phases of construction and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Updated Analysis Indicates Increased Construction-Related ROG Emissions In an effort to more accurately estimate the Project’s construction-related and operational emissions we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the DEIR. In 5 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 32.
5 our updated model we included the correct land use sizes and proportionately altered the construction phase lengths to match the total duration of 65 months.6 Our analysis estimates that the reactive organic gasses (“ROG”) emissions associated with Project construction would significantly increase from the values calculated in the DEIR’s models (see table below).

SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction ROG
(lbs/day)
DEIR 60.6
SWAPE 636.7
% Increase 950%
As demonstrated above, construction-related ROG emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 950%. While the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (“SMAQMD”) does not currently list a threshold for construction-related ROG emissions, the increase is substantial and the Project could have potential air quality impacts on the environment. 7 As a result, we recommend the incorporation of low-volatile organic compounds (“VOC”) paints to reduce the Projectrelated ROG emissions.

Failure to Implement All Feasible Mitigation Measures to Reduce Emissions The DEIR claims the Project will result in emissions that exceed the SMAQMD significance threshold for daily and annual ROG and nitrogen oxides (“NOx”) emissions (see excerpt below) (p. 4.3-46, Table 4.3-9). 6 See Attachments A and B for construction calculations and the updated CalEEMod model, respectively. 7 “SMAQMD Thresholds of Significance Table.” SMAQMD, April 2020, available at:
https://www.airquality.org/LandUseTransportation/Documents/CH2ThresholdsTable4-2020.pdf, p. 1. 6 The DEIR consequently implements Mitigation Measure (“MM”) 4.3-2, stating:
“As shown in Table 4.3-10, the proposed project would meet the 35 percent reduction target with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.3-2, which represents all feasible mitigation.

However, even with a 35 percent reduction, emission levels would still exceed the applicable threshold of significance and, therefore, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable” (DEIR, p. 4.3-47).

While we agree that the implementation of MM 4.3-2 would reduce operational emissions, the Project fails to implement all feasible mitigation measures. To reduce the Project’s air quality impacts to the maximum extent possible, additional feasible mitigation measures should be incorporated, such as those suggested in the section of this letter titled “Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions.” Consequently, the DEIR’s conclusion that Project’s air quality emissions would be significantand-unavoidable is unsubstantiated. The Project should not be approved until a revised EIR is prepared, incorporating all feasible mitigation to reduce emissions to less-than-significant levels.

Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The DEIR conducts a health risk assessment (“HRA”) evaluating exposure to diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions from “on-site use of heavy-duty diesel trucks to transport goods” during Project operation (p. 4.3-49). Specifically, the DEIR estimates that, at the maximally exposed receptor, the maximum cancer risk as a result of Project operational heavy-duty diesel trucks would be 9.53 in one million, which would not exceed the SMAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million (see excerpt below) (p. 4.3-51, Table 4.3-11).
7 Regarding the health risk impacts associated with the Project construction, the DEIR states:
“Because construction equipment on-site would not operate for long periods of time and would be used at varying locations within the sites, associated emissions of DPM would not occur at the same location (or be evenly spread throughout the entire project site) for long periods of time. Due to the temporary nature of construction and the relatively short duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, the potential for any one sensitive receptor in the area to be exposed to concentrations of pollutants for a substantially extended period of time would be low. Therefore, construction associated with the proposed project would not be expected to expose any sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. In addition, it should be noted that due to the temporary nature of construction activities, construction of the proposed project would not result in any worse impacts than what would occur during operations associated with DPM emissions generated by heavy duty truck traffic, as discussed in further detail below. In addition, as discussed above, Mitigation Measure 4.3-1(b) would require the use of cleaner engine construction equipment, such as Tier 4 final equipment, during project construction, which would further help to reduce DPM emissions during construction” (p. 4.3-49 - 50).

As demonstrated above, the DEIR claims that the Project does not require a construction HRA due to its short construction duration and dispersed constriction equipment emissions. However, the DEIR’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for four reasons.

First, the DEIR fails to mention the exposure assumptions for the operational HRA, such as age sensitivity factors (“ASF”) or fraction of time at home (“FAH”) values whatsoever. Until the DEIR substantiates the use of correct exposure assumptions, the HRA may underestimate the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors due to Project operation. Furthermore, according to the Risk Assessment Guidelines provided by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the 8 organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, the DEIR’s HRA should have used the following equation:8
However, the DEIR fails to mention or provide a dose and risk equation to calculate the Project’s operational cancer risks. As such, we cannot verify that the DEIR’s HRA is accurate, and the Project’s cancer risks may be underestimated.

Second, by failing to require a quantified construction HRA, the DEIR is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to make “a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences.”9 This poses a problem, as the Project will produce DPM emissions through the exhaust stacks of on-site heavy-duty construction equipment. However, the DEIR fails to evaluate the potential toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions generated from future projects or indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Without making a reasonable effort to connect the DEIR’s construction-related TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the DEIR is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by future projects with the potential adverse impacts on human health.

Third, the State of California Department of Justice (“DOJ”) recommends that all warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to the OEHHA, the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district guidelines. 10 A revised EIR should therefore be prepared to require an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from DPM emissions generated during Project construction and operation.

Fourth, while the DEIR includes a HRA evaluating the health risk impacts to nearby, existing receptors as a result of operation, the DEIR fails to require the evaluation of the combined lifetime cancer risk as a result of construction and operation together. According to OEHHA guidance, “the excess cancer risk is 8 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-7, Equation 8.2.4. 9 “Sierra Club v. County of Fresno.” Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20County%20of%20Fresno.pdf. 10 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6. 9 calculated separately for each age grouping and then summed to yield cancer risk at the receptor location.”11 However, the DEIR fails to require the summing of each age bin to evaluate the combined cancer risk of total construction and operations. This is incorrect, and a revised EIR should be prepared to quantify the entirety of the Project’s construction and operational health risks together and sum them to compare to the above-mentioned SMAQMD threshold of 10 in one million.

Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.12 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”) guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”). 13, 14A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach should be conducted prior to approval of the Project.

We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction-related health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the DEIR’s CalEEMod output files for the “ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation” model. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.15 The DEIR’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 1,451 pounds of DPM over the 1,973-day construction period. 16 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:
  

� =
1,451.0 
1,973  ×
453.6 
 ×
1 
24 ℎ ×
1 ℎ
3,600 
= .  /
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00386 grams per second (“g/s”).

Construction was simulated as a 353.5-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate dimensions of 1,691- by 846-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of stacks of construction equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical 11 “Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 8-4 12 “Air Quality Dispersion Modeling - Screening Models,” U.S. EPA, available at: https://www.epa.gov/scram/airquality-dispersion-modeling-screening-models. 13 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 14 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects.” CAPCOA, July 2009, available at:
http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 15 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 16 See Attachment C for health risk calculations.
10 dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release.

An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Sacramento was obtained from U.S. 2022 Census data. 17 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project Site. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) suggests that the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10% in screening procedures.18 According to the DEIR the nearest sensitive receptors is Paso Verde K-8 School located adjacent to the Project site (p. 4.11-4). However, according to the AERSCREEN output files, the maximally exposed individual receptor (“MEIR”) was identified at approximately 925 meters from the Project site. The single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 0.2134 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 925 meters downwind.

Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of

0.02134 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR.19
We calculated the excess cancer risk using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA.

Specifically, guidance from OEHHA and the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high-point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and ASF in order to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters, such as the daily breathing rates (“BR/BW”), exposure duration (“ED”), ASF, fraction of time at home (“FAH”), and exposure frequency (“EF”) utilized for the various age groups in our screening-level HRA are as follows:
17 “Sacramento.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2022, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0664000. 18 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA, October 1992, available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/documents/epa-454r-92-019_ocr.pdf. 19 See Attachment D for AERSCREEN output files. 11 Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)20
Age
Sensitivity
Factor21
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home22
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)23
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 1 350 24
Infant (0 - 2) 1090 10 2 1 350 24
Child (2 - 16) 572 3 14 1 350 24
Adult (16 - 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24
For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify dose for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day-1) to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, we utilized the following dose algorithm:
,   =  ×  × 

 ×  × 
where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (μg/m3)
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-6, μg to mg, L to m3)
To calculate the overall cancer risk, we used the following equation for each appropriate age group:
  =  ×  ×  ×  ×


20 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/riskassessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 21 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-5 Table 8.3. 22 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7. 23 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24. 12 where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day)-1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years) Consistent with the 1,973-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years), infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years), and first 3.16 years of the child stage of life (2 – 16 years). The results of our calculations are shown in the table below.

The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.0213 2.47E-07
Infant (0 - 2) Construction 2 0.0213 5.96E-06
Construction 3.16 0.0213 1.25E-06
Operation 10.84 * *
Child (2 - 16) Total 14 1.25E-06
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 * *
Lifetime 30 7.46E-06
The excess cancer risks to the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infant and child receptors at the MEIR located approximately 925 meters away, over the course of Project construction, are approximately 0.247, 5.96, and 1.25 in one million, respectively. The total excess cancer risk associated with Project construction is approximately 7.46 in one million. When summing the Project’s construction-related cancer risk, as estimated by SWAPE, with the DEIR’s operational cancer risk of 9.53 in one million, we estimate an excess cancer risk of approximately 16.99 in one million over the course of a 30-year residential lifetime (p. 4.3-51, Table 4.3-11).24 The lifetime cancer risk exceeds the SMAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the DEIR. 24 Calculated: 7.46 in one million + 9.53 in one million = 16.99 in one million. 13 An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project’s emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the link between Project-generated emissions and potential adverse health risk impacts.

According to the U.S. EPA:
“EPA’s Exposure Assessment Guidelines recommend completing exposure assessments iteratively using a tiered approach to ‘strike a balance between the costs of adding detail and refinement to an assessment and the benefits associated with that additional refinement’ (U.S.

EPA, 1992).

In other words, an assessment using basic tools (e.g., simple exposure calculations, default values, rules of thumb, conservative assumptions) can be conducted as the first phase (or tier) of the overall assessment (i.e., a screening-level assessment).

The exposure assessor or risk manager can then determine whether the results of the screeninglevel assessment warrant further evaluation through refinements of the input data and exposure assumptions or by using more advanced models.”25 As demonstrated above, screening-level analyses warrant further evaluation in a refined modeling approach. As our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, a revised EIR should be prepared to include a refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with Project construction. This is of utmost importance as the proposed Project site is located adjacent to a K8 school (p. 4.11-4). The U.S. EPA states:
“Children are at greatest risk from exposure to ozone because their lungs are still developing and they are more likely to be active outdoors when ozone levels are high, which increases their exposure. Children are also more likely than adults to have asthma.”26 If the refined analysis similarly concludes that the Project would result in a significant health risk impact, then additional mitigation measures should be incorporated to reduce the Project’s potential impacts as described in the “Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions” section of this letter.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions According to CEQA Guidelines § 15096(g)(2):
“When an updated EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible 25 “Exposure Assessment Tools by Tiers and Types - Screening-Level and Refined.” U.S. EPA, available at:
https://www.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-tiers-and-types-screening-level-and-refined. 26 “Health Effects of Ozone Pollution.” U.S. EPA, May 2021, available at: https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozonepollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution. 14 mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment.”
The DEIR is consequently required under CEQA to implement all feasible mitigation to reduce the Project’s potential impacts. As demonstrated in the sections above, the Project would result in potentially significant air quality and health risk impacts that should be mitigated further.

First, in order to reduce the ROG emissions associated with Project construction and operation, we recommend the DEIR consider incorporating the following mitigation measure from the DOJ: 27 • Require the use of super compliant, low-VOC paints less than 10 g/L during the architectural coating construction phase and during Project maintenance.

Furthermore, Los Angeles County recommends:28
• If paints and coatings with VOC content of 0 grams/liter to less than 10 grams/liter cannot be utilized, the developer shall avoid application of architectural coatings during the peak smog season: July, August, and September.

While the Project is not located in Los Angeles County, the use of low-VOC paint and reduced application during affected periods would nonetheless decrease the Project’s significant ROG emissions.

Second, the EPA explains that NOx emissions originate from “motor vehicle internal combustion engines and fossil fuel-fired electric utility and industrial boilers.” In order to reduce the NOx emissions associated with Project operation, we recommend the DEIR consider incorporating several mitigation measures (see list below).

CARB recommends: 29
• Requiring all loading/unloading docks and trailer spaces be equipped with electrical hookups for trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU) or auxiliary power units; • Requiring all TRUs entering the project-site be plug-in capable; • Including contractual language in tenant lease agreements restricting trucks and support equipment from idling longer than two minutes while on site; and • Requiring the installing of vegetative walls or other effective barriers that separate loading docks and people living or working nearby.
27 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10. 28 “Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.” Los Angeles County Housing Element Update Program EIR.

August 2021, available at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Housing_final-peirmitigation-monitoring.pdf. 29 “Recommended Air Pollution Emission Reduction Measures for Warehouses and Distribution Centers.” CARB, August 2023, available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/CARB%20Comments%20- %20NOP%20for%20the%20%20Oak%20Valley%20North%20Project%20DEIR.pdf; Attachment A, p. 5 – 8. 15 The DOJ recommends:30
• Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the local air district, and the building manager.

As demonstrated above, we have provided several mitigation measures that would reduce Projectrelated ROG and NOx emissions developed from the DOJ, CARB, and Los Angeles County. These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.

A revised EIR should be prepared that includes all feasible mitigation measures, as well as updated air quality and health risk analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to the maximum extent feasible. The revised EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s potentially significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
30 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10. 16 Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: Updated Construction Calculations
Attachment B: SWAPE's CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment C: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment D: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment E: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment F: Paul Rosenfeld CV
Phase
Default Phase
Length
Construction
Duration %
Construction
Duration
Revised Phase
Length
Site Preparation 180 8336 0.0216 1973 43
Grading 465 8336 0.0558 1973 110
Construction 4650 8336 0.5578 1973 1101
Paving 330 8336 0.0396 1973 78
Architectural Coating 330 8336 0.0396 1973 78
Total Default
Construction
Duration
Revised
Construction
Duration
Start Date 9/1/2023 9/1/2023
End Date 6/28/2046 1/25/2029
Total Days 8336 1973
Construction Schedule Calculations
Attachment A
ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE's comment on "Underestimated Land Use Size."Construction Phase - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths."Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Operational Off-Road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Industrial Park 5,204.50 1000sqft 235.60 5,204,500.00
0 Parking Lot 3,670.00 Space 33.03 1,468,000.00
0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 16.70 1000sqft 6.40 16,700.00 0 Hotel 122.00 Room 4.00 73,400.00
0 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 20.00 Pump 3.00 8,100.00 0 1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban6
Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

3.5 5
8 1.0 Pro1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data ject CharacteristicsUtility Company Sacramento Municipal Utility District
2029
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
357.98 0.03
3 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.00 4
N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 1 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment
B
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstructionPhase NumDays 330.00 78.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 2 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4,650.00 1,101.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 465.00 110.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 330.00 78.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 180.00 43.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/28/2046 1/25/2029tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/17/2043 6/21/2028 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/19/2026 4/2/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/23/2045 10/9/2028tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/9/2024 10/31/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/24/2045 10/10/2028tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/20/2026 4/3/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/10/2024 11/1/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/18/2043 6/22/2028 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 330.00 900.00tblGrading AcresOfGrading 64.50 75.00tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 304,000.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 177,144.00 73,400.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,823.50 8,100.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 119.48 235.60tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.38 6.40 tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.07 4.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.06 3.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear 260.00 300.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay 8.00 12.00tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber 0.00 95.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 3 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 616.12 208.86tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 7.20tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.54 1.94tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 472.58 208.86tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 7.20tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.24 1.94tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 470.95 208.86tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.20tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.37 1.94 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 4 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1507 2.5177 1.2518 6.8700e003 1.1979 0.0665 1.2644 0.3814 0.0615 0.4429 0.0000 655.4433 655.4433 0.0797 0.0733 679.28112024 1.1615 9.8010 10.4462 0.0491 3.5803 0.1559 3.7362 0.9468 0.1461 1.0930 0.0000 4,679.257 1 4,679.257 1 0.2356 0.4449 4,817.728 22025 1.2871 8.9335 11.6436 0.0520 3.5726 0.1184 3.6911 0.9698 0.1117 1.0815 0.0000 4,964.744 4 4,964.744 4 0.1912 0.4347 5,099.074 32026 1.2280 8.7465 11.1648 0.0508 3.5726 0.1169 3.6894 0.9697 0.1103 1.0800 0.0000 4,863.400 4 4,863.400 4 0.1848 0.4247 4,994.571 62027 1.1736 8.5790 10.7558 0.0496 3.5725 0.1154 3.6879 0.9697 0.1088 1.0786 0.0000 4,763.591 2 4,763.591 2 0.1789 0.4147 4,891.646 92028 19.3960 4.3647 5.8301 0.0248 1.8111 0.0721 1.8832 0.4909 0.0677 0.5586 0.0000 2,378.339 2 2,378.339 2 0.1097 0.1933 2,438.685 42029 6.0491 0.0163 0.1065 3.1000e004 0.0397 6.4000e- 004 0.0403 0.0106 6.3000e- 004 0.0112 0.0000 30.2151 30.2151 7.2000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 30.4265 Maximum 19.3960 9.8010 11.6436 0.0520 3.5803 0.1559 3.7362 0.9698 0.1461 1.0930 0.0000 4,964.744 4 4,964.744 4 0.2356 0.4449 5,099.074 3 Unmitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 5 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0485 1.2982 1.4146 6.8700e003 1.1979 0.0122 1.2101 0.3814 0.0118 0.3932 0.0000 655.4430 655.4430 0.0797 0.0733 679.28082024 0.9677 7.7341 10.7491 0.0491 3.5803 0.0587 3.6390 0.9468 0.0561 1.0029 0.0000 4,679.256 6 4,679.256 6 0.2356 0.4449 4,817.727 72025 1.1514 7.5979 11.8231 0.0520 3.5726 0.0549 3.6275 0.9698 0.0523 1.0220 0.0000 4,964.744 1 4,964.744 1 0.1912 0.4347 5,099.073 92026 1.0924 7.4108 11.3443 0.0508 3.5726 0.0534 3.6259 0.9697 0.0508 1.0206 0.0000 4,863.400 0 4,863.400 0 0.1848 0.4247 4,994.571 22027 1.0379 7.2433 10.9353 0.0496 3.5725 0.0519 3.6243 0.9697 0.0494 1.0191 0.0000 4,763.590 8 4,763.590 8 0.1789 0.4147 4,891.646 52028 19.3031 3.4180 6.0214 0.0248 1.8111 0.0259 1.8370 0.4909 0.0247 0.5156 0.0000 2,378.338 9 2,378.338 9 0.1097 0.1933 2,438.685 22029 6.0478 6.6500e003 0.1068 3.1000e- 004 0.0397 1.9000e- 004 0.0399 0.0106 1.8000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 30.2151 30.2151 7.2000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 30.4265 Maximum 19.3031 7.7341 11.8231 0.0520 3.5803 0.0587 3.6390 0.9698 0.0561 1.0220 0.0000 4,964.744 1 4,964.744 1 0.2356 0.4449 5,099.073 9 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

2.62 19.20 -2.34 0.00 0.00 60.20 2.16 0.00 59.58 6.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 1.6771 0.71172 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 3.0078 1.9581 3 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 2.7537 2.12184 6-1-2024 8-31-2024 2.6207 2.2149 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 6 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5 9-1-2024 11-30-2024 2.6719 2.2704
6 12-1-2024 2-28-2025 2.6136 2.2393
7 3-1-2025 5-31-2025 2.5577 2.18728 6-1-2025 8-31-2025 2.5182 2.14779 9-1-2025 11-30-2025 2.5685 2.2021 10 12-1-2025 2-28-2026 2.5370 2.174611 3-1-2026 5-31-2026 2.4952 2.124712 6-1-2026 8-31-2026 2.4565 2.086113 9-1-2026 11-30-2026 2.5059 2.139514 12-1-2026 2-28-2027 2.4783 2.115915 3-1-2027 5-31-2027 2.4388 2.068416 6-1-2027 8-31-2027 2.4009 2.030517 9-1-2027 11-30-2027 2.4495 2.083018 12-1-2027 2-29-2028 2.4541 2.087719 3-1-2028 5-31-2028 2.3908 2.020420 6-1-2028 8-31-2028 0.8075 0.520021 9-1-2028 11-30-2028 12.0102 11.877222 12-1-2028 2-28-2029 12.7731 12.7499 Highest 12.7731 12.7499
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 7 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 23.2934 1.0400e003 0.1150 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.2388 Energy 0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.0216 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.0000 15,982.68 05 15,982.68
05 1.1875 0.2066 16,073.93
94 Mobile 4.2243 3.2322 24.6452 0.0316 3.4330 0.0285 3.4615 0.9174 0.0266 0.9439 0.0000 3,073.143 6 3,073.143 6 0.3822 0.2389 3,153.880 3 Offroad 1.8573 17.4962 24.2339 0.0327 0.9366 0.9366 0.8617 0.8617 0.0000 2,870.473 4 2,870.473 4 0.9284 0.0000 2,893.682 6 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,362.627 6 0.0000 1,362.627 6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852 2 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 428.7769 980.9625 1,409.739 4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031 6 Total 29.7706 24.3256 52.0149 0.0859 3.4330 1.2389 4.6719 0.9174 1.1620 2.0793 1,791.404 5 22,907.48 41 24,698.88 86 84.5939 1.3889 27,227.62 49 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 8 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
9/1/2023 10/31/2023
5 4
3 2
Grading
Grading 11/1/2023
4/2/2024
5 11
0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 9 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3 Building Construction
Building Construction
4/3/2024
6/21/2028
5 1101
4 Paving
Paving
6/22/2028 10/9/2028
5 7
8 5
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating 10/10/2028 1/25/2029
5 7
8 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.0
0 7
8 0.4
8 Building Construction
Cranes 1 7.0
0 231 0.2
9 Grading
Excavators
2 8.0
0 15
8 0.3
8 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.0
0 8
9 0.2
0 Building Construction
Generator Sets 1 8.0
0 8
4 0.7
4 Grading
Graders 1 8.0
0 18
7 0.41
Paving
Pavers
2 8.0
0 13
0 0.4
2 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.0
0 13
2 0.3
6 Paving
Rollers
2 8.0
0 8
0 0.3
8 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.0
0 24
7 0.4
0 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.0
0 24
7 0.4
0 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.0
0 36
7 0.4
8 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Building Construction
Welders 1 8.0
0 4
6 0.4
5 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,954,050; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,651,350; Striped Parking Area: 8 8,080
(Architectural Coating
–
s
qft
)
Acres of Gradin
g
(Site Pre
paration Phase
): 75
Acres of Gradin
g
(Grading Phase
): 900
Acres of Pavin
g: 33.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 10 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUse Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentTrips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7 18.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading
8 20.0
0 0.0
0 38,000.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction
9 2,843.0
0 1,110.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving
6 15.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 569.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 11 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1100e003 6.9000e- 004 9.0200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.3014 Total 1.1100e003 6.9000e- 004 9.0200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.3014 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.4282 0.0000 0.4282 0.2178 0.0000 0.2178 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0100 0.0434 0.4487 8.2000e004 1.3300e- 003 1.3300e- 003 1.3300e- 003 1.3300e- 003 0.0000 71.9189 71.9189 0.0233 0.0000 72.5004 Total 0.0100 0.0434 0.4487 8.2000e004 0.4282 1.3300e- 003 0.4295 0.2178 1.3300e- 003 0.2191 0.0000 71.9189 71.9189 0.0233 0.0000 72.5004 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 12 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1100e003 6.9000e- 004 9.0200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.3014 Total 1.1100e003 6.9000e- 004 9.0200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.2801 2.2801 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.3014 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.6381 0.0000 0.6381 0.1275 0.0000 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0714 0.7421 0.6031 1.3300e003 0.0306 0.0306 0.0282 0.0282 0.0000 117.2507 117.2507 0.0379 0.0000 118.1987 Total 0.0714 0.7421 0.6031 1.3300e003 0.6381 0.0306 0.6688 0.1275 0.0282 0.1556 0.0000 117.2507 117.2507 0.0379 0.0000 118.1987 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 13 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0198 1.1824 0.2374 4.6600e003 0.1256 8.6200e- 003 0.1342 0.0345 8.2500e- 003 0.0428 0.0000 461.4600 461.4600 0.0184 0.0732 483.7234 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.2300e003 7.6000e- 004 0.0100 3.0000e- 005 3.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1700e- 003 8.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.5335 2.5335 8.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.5571 Total 0.0210 1.1831 0.2474 4.6900e003 0.1288 8.6400e- 003 0.1374 0.0354 8.2700e- 003 0.0436 0.0000 463.9934 463.9934 0.0185 0.0732 486.2805 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.6381 0.0000 0.6381 0.1275 0.0000 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0164 0.0710 0.7095 1.3300e003 2.1800e- 003 2.1800e- 003 2.1800e- 003 2.1800e- 003 0.0000 117.2506 117.2506 0.0379 0.0000 118.1986 Total 0.0164 0.0710 0.7095 1.3300e003 0.6381 2.1800e- 003 0.6403 0.1275 2.1800e- 003 0.1296 0.0000 117.2506 117.2506 0.0379 0.0000 118.1986 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 14 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0198 1.1824 0.2374 4.6600e003 0.1256 8.6200e- 003 0.1342 0.0345 8.2500e- 003 0.0428 0.0000 461.4600 461.4600 0.0184 0.0732 483.7234 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.2300e003 7.6000e- 004 0.0100 3.0000e- 005 3.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1700e- 003 8.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.5335 2.5335 8.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.5571 Total 0.0210 1.1831 0.2474 4.6900e003 0.1288 8.6400e- 003 0.1374 0.0354 8.2700e- 003 0.0436 0.0000 463.9934 463.9934 0.0185 0.0732 486.2805 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.7104 0.0000 0.7104 0.1672 0.0000 0.1672 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1078 1.0846 0.9287 2.0800e003 0.0447 0.0447 0.0412 0.0412 0.0000 182.6404 182.6404 0.0591 0.0000 184.1171 Total 0.1078 1.0846 0.9287 2.0800e003 0.7104 0.0447 0.7551 0.1672 0.0412 0.2083 0.0000 182.6404 182.6404 0.0591 0.0000 184.1171 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 15 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0301 1.7959 0.3712 7.1200e003 0.1957 0.0133 0.2090 0.0538 0.0127 0.0665 0.0000 705.1967 705.1967 0.0280 0.1118 739.2201 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.8000e003 1.0600e- 003 0.0145 4.0000e- 005 4.9200e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.9500e- 003 1.3100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.3300e- 003 0.0000 3.8490 3.8490 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 3.8831 Total 0.0319 1.7969 0.3858 7.1600e003 0.2006 0.0133 0.2139 0.0551 0.0127 0.0678 0.0000 709.0457 709.0457 0.0281 0.1119 743.1032 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.7104 0.0000 0.7104 0.1672 0.0000 0.1672 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0255 0.1106 1.1055 2.0800e003 3.4000e- 003 3.4000e- 003 3.4000e- 003 3.4000e- 003 0.0000 182.6402 182.6402 0.0591 0.0000 184.1169 Total 0.0255 0.1106 1.1055 2.0800e003 0.7104 3.4000e- 003 0.7138 0.1672 3.4000e- 003 0.1706 0.0000 182.6402 182.6402 0.0591 0.0000 184.1169 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 16 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0301 1.7959 0.3712 7.1200e003 0.1957 0.0133 0.2090 0.0538 0.0127 0.0665 0.0000 705.1967 705.1967 0.0280 0.1118 739.2201 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.8000e003 1.0600e- 003 0.0145 4.0000e- 005 4.9200e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.9500e- 003 1.3100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.3300e- 003 0.0000 3.8490 3.8490 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 3.8831 Total 0.0319 1.7969 0.3858 7.1600e003 0.2006 0.0133 0.2139 0.0551 0.0127 0.0678 0.0000 709.0457 709.0457 0.0281 0.1119 743.1032 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.1435 1.3108 1.5763 2.6300e003 0.0598 0.0598 0.0563 0.0563 0.0000 226.0529 226.0529 0.0535 0.0000 227.3893 Total 0.1435 1.3108 1.5763 2.6300e003 0.0598 0.0598 0.0563 0.0563 0.0000 226.0529 226.0529 0.0535 0.0000 227.3893 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 17 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1350 5.1709 1.5410 0.0202 0.6335 0.0277 0.6612 0.1831 0.0265 0.2096 0.0000 1,969.119 3 1,969.119 3 0.0481 0.2896 2,056.614 8Worker 0.7434 0.4378 6.0145 0.0170 2.0358 0.0104 2.0462 0.5415 9.5300e003 0.5510 0.0000 1,592.398 8 1,592.398 8 0.0469 0.0434 1,606.503 8 Total 0.8784 5.6087 7.5555 0.0373 2.6693 0.0380 2.7073 0.7246 0.0360 0.7606 0.0000 3,561.518 1 3,561.518 1 0.0950 0.3330 3,663.118 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0320 0.2179 1.7024 2.6300e003 3.9800e- 003 3.9800e- 003 3.9800e- 003 3.9800e- 003 0.0000 226.0526 226.0526 0.0535 0.0000 227.3890 Total 0.0320 0.2179 1.7024 2.6300e003 3.9800e- 003 3.9800e- 003 3.9800e- 003 3.9800e- 003 0.0000 226.0526 226.0526 0.0535 0.0000 227.3890 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 18 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1350 5.1709 1.5410 0.0202 0.6335 0.0277 0.6612 0.1831 0.0265 0.2096 0.0000 1,969.119 3 1,969.119 3 0.0481 0.2896 2,056.614 8Worker 0.7434 0.4378 6.0145 0.0170 2.0358 0.0104 2.0462 0.5415 9.5300e003 0.5510 0.0000 1,592.398 8 1,592.398 8 0.0469 0.0434 1,606.503 8 Total 0.8784 5.6087 7.5555 0.0373 2.6693 0.0380 2.7073 0.7246 0.0360 0.7606 0.0000 3,561.518 1 3,561.518 1 0.0950 0.3330 3,663.118 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2025 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 19 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1741 6.7805 2.0142 0.0265 0.8478 0.0363 0.8841 0.2451 0.0347 0.2798 0.0000 2,582.270 1 2,582.270 1 0.0631 0.3804 2,697.214 5Worker 0.9345 0.5258 7.5304 0.0220 2.7249 0.0132 2.7381 0.7247 0.0122 0.7369 0.0000 2,079.819 4 2,079.819 4 0.0570 0.0543 2,097.426 3 Total 1.1086 7.3062 9.5446 0.0485 3.5726 0.0496 3.6222 0.9698 0.0469 1.0167 0.0000 4,662.089 5 4,662.089 5 0.1200 0.4347 4,794.640 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0428 0.2916 2.2786 3.5200e003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.0428 0.2916 2.2786 3.5200e003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 20 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1741 6.7805 2.0142 0.0265 0.8478 0.0363 0.8841 0.2451 0.0347 0.2798 0.0000 2,582.270 1 2,582.270 1 0.0631 0.3804 2,697.214 5Worker 0.9345 0.5258 7.5304 0.0220 2.7249 0.0132 2.7381 0.7247 0.0122 0.7369 0.0000 2,079.819 4 2,079.819 4 0.0570 0.0543 2,097.426 3 Total 1.1086 7.3062 9.5446 0.0485 3.5726 0.0496 3.6222 0.9698 0.0469 1.0167 0.0000 4,662.089 5 4,662.089 5 0.1200 0.4347 4,794.640 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2026 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 21 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1680 6.6427 1.9742 0.0260 0.8477 0.0354 0.8831 0.2450 0.0339 0.2789 0.0000 2,530.311 1 2,530.311 1 0.0617 0.3735 2,643.157 5Worker 0.8816 0.4765 7.0916 0.0213 2.7249 0.0126 2.7375 0.7247 0.0116 0.7364 0.0000 2,030.434 4 2,030.434 4 0.0520 0.0512 2,046.980 6 Total 1.0496 7.1192 9.0658 0.0473 3.5726 0.0480 3.6206 0.9697 0.0455 1.0153 0.0000 4,560.745 5 4,560.745 5 0.1137 0.4247 4,690.138 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0428 0.2916 2.2786 3.5200e003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.0428 0.2916 2.2786 3.5200e003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 22 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1680 6.6427 1.9742 0.0260 0.8477 0.0354 0.8831 0.2450 0.0339 0.2789 0.0000 2,530.311 1 2,530.311 1 0.0617 0.3735 2,643.157 5Worker 0.8816 0.4765 7.0916 0.0213 2.7249 0.0126 2.7375 0.7247 0.0116 0.7364 0.0000 2,030.434 4 2,030.434 4 0.0520 0.0512 2,046.980 6 Total 1.0496 7.1192 9.0658 0.0473 3.5726 0.0480 3.6206 0.9697 0.0455 1.0153 0.0000 4,560.745 5 4,560.745 5 0.1137 0.4247 4,690.138 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2027 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 23 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1625 6.5164 1.9400 0.0254 0.8476 0.0346 0.8822 0.2450 0.0331 0.2781 0.0000 2,476.063 9 2,476.063 9 0.0601 0.3662 2,586.687 8Worker 0.8326 0.4353 6.7167 0.0207 2.7249 0.0119 2.7368 0.7247 0.0110 0.7357 0.0000 1,984.872 4 1,984.872 4 0.0477 0.0485 2,000.525 6 Total 0.9951 6.9517 8.6567 0.0461 3.5725 0.0465 3.6190 0.9697 0.0441 1.0138 0.0000 4,460.936 3 4,460.936 3 0.1078 0.4147 4,587.213 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0428 0.2916 2.2786 3.5200e003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.0428 0.2916 2.2786 3.5200e003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 24 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1625 6.5164 1.9400 0.0254 0.8476 0.0346 0.8822 0.2450 0.0331 0.2781 0.0000 2,476.063 9 2,476.063 9 0.0601 0.3662 2,586.687 8Worker 0.8326 0.4353 6.7167 0.0207 2.7249 0.0119 2.7368 0.7247 0.0110 0.7357 0.0000 1,984.872 4 1,984.872 4 0.0477 0.0485 2,000.525 6 Total 0.9951 6.9517 8.6567 0.0461 3.5725 0.0465 3.6190 0.9697 0.0441 1.0138 0.0000 4,460.936 3 4,460.936 3 0.1078 0.4147 4,587.213 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2028 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0841 0.7669 0.9892 1.6600e003 0.0324 0.0324 0.0305 0.0305 0.0000 142.6305 142.6305 0.0335 0.0000 143.4687 Total 0.0841 0.7669 0.9892 1.6600e003 0.0324 0.0324 0.0305 0.0305 0.0000 142.6305 142.6305 0.0335 0.0000 143.4687 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 25 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0743 3.0214 0.9013 0.0117 0.3994 0.0160 0.4154 0.1154 0.0153 0.1307 0.0000 1,142.919 7 1,142.919 7 0.0278 0.1693 1,194.062 4Worker 0.3712 0.1891 3.0179 9.4700e003 1.2841 5.2800e- 003 1.2894 0.3415 4.8600e- 003 0.3464 0.0000 916.1626 916.1626 0.0207 0.0218 923.1885 Total 0.4455 3.2106 3.9192 0.0212 1.6835 0.0212 1.7048 0.4570 0.0201 0.4771 0.0000 2,059.082 3 2,059.082 3 0.0485 0.1911 2,117.250 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0202 0.1374 1.0738 1.6600e003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 142.6303 142.6303 0.0335 0.0000 143.4685 Total 0.0202 0.1374 1.0738 1.6600e003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 142.6303 142.6303 0.0335 0.0000 143.4685 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 26 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0743 3.0214 0.9013 0.0117 0.3994 0.0160 0.4154 0.1154 0.0153 0.1307 0.0000 1,142.919 7 1,142.919 7 0.0278 0.1693 1,194.062 4Worker 0.3712 0.1891 3.0179 9.4700e003 1.2841 5.2800e- 003 1.2894 0.3415 4.8600e- 003 0.3464 0.0000 916.1626 916.1626 0.0207 0.0218 923.1885 Total 0.4455 3.2106 3.9192 0.0212 1.6835 0.0212 1.7048 0.4570 0.0201 0.4771 0.0000 2,059.082 3 2,059.082 3 0.0485 0.1911 2,117.250 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0357 0.3347 0.5685 8.9000e004 0.0163 0.0163 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 78.0751 78.0751 0.0253 0.0000 78.7064 Paving 0.0433 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0790 0.3347 0.5685 8.9000e004 0.0163 0.0163 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 78.0751 78.0751 0.0253 0.0000 78.7064 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 27 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.2400e003 6.3000e- 004 0.0101 3.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.3100e- 003 1.1400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 3.0888 Total 1.2400e003 6.3000e- 004 0.0101 3.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.3100e- 003 1.1400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 3.0888 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrOff-Road 0.0109 0.0474 0.6745 8.9000e004 1.4600e- 003 1.4600e- 003 1.4600e- 003 1.4600e- 003 0.0000 78.0750 78.0750 0.0253 0.0000 78.7063 Paving 0.0433 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0542 0.0474 0.6745 8.9000e004 1.4600e- 003 1.4600e- 003 1.4600e- 003 1.4600e- 003 0.0000 78.0750 78.0750 0.0253 0.0000 78.7063 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 28 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.2400e003 6.3000e- 004 0.0101 3.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.3100e- 003 1.1400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 3.0888 Total 1.2400e003 6.3000e- 004 0.0101 3.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.3100e- 003 1.1400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 3.0653 3.0653 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 3.0888 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 18.7455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.0400e003 0.0338 0.0534 9.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.5424 Total 18.7505 0.0338 0.0534 9.0000e005 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.5424 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 29 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0356 0.0182 0.2897 9.1000e004 0.1233 5.1000e- 004 0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e- 004 0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e- 003 2.1000e- 003 88.6284 Total 0.0356 0.0182 0.2897 9.1000e004 0.1233 5.1000e- 004 0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e- 004 0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e- 003 2.1000e- 003 88.6284 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 18.7455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.8000e004 3.8000e- 003 0.0541 9.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.5424 Total 18.7463 3.8000e003 0.0541 9.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.5321 7.5321 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.5424 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 30 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0356 0.0182 0.2897 9.1000e004 0.1233 5.1000e- 004 0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e- 004 0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e- 003 2.1000e- 003 88.6284 Total 0.0356 0.0182 0.2897 9.1000e004 0.1233 5.1000e- 004 0.1238 0.0328 4.7000e- 004 0.0333 0.0000 87.9539 87.9539 1.9900e- 003 2.1000e- 003 88.6284 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 6.0367 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6200e003 0.0109 0.0172 3.0000e- 005 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4289 Total 6.0383 0.0109 0.0172 3.0000e005 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4289 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 31 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0108 5.4300e003 0.0894 2.9000e- 004 0.0397 1.5000e- 004 0.0399 0.0106 1.4000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 27.7895 27.7895 5.9000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 27.9976 Total 0.0108 5.4300e003 0.0894 2.9000e- 004 0.0397 1.5000e- 004 0.0399 0.0106 1.4000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 27.7895 27.7895 5.9000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 27.9976 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 6.0367 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.8000e004 1.2200e- 003 0.0174 3.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4289 Total 6.0370 1.2200e003 0.0174 3.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4289 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 32 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 33 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrMitigated 4.2243 3.2322 24.6452 0.0316 3.4330 0.0285 3.4615 0.9174 0.0266 0.9439 0.0000 3,073.143 6 3,073.143 6 0.3822 0.2389 3,153.880 3 Unmitigated 4.2243 3.2322 24.6452 0.0316 3.4330 0.0285 3.4615 0.9174 0.0266 0.9439 0.0000 3,073.143 6 3,073.143 6 0.3822 0.2389 3,153.880 3

4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
Avera
ge Daily Trip Rate Unmiti
gated Miti
gated
Land Use Weekday Saturday
Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Convenience Market with Gas Pum
ps 2,031.00 2,031.00 2031.00 282,840 282,840
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,487.96 3,487.96 3487.96 790,323 790,323 Hotel 878.40 878.40 878.40 419,565 419,565
Industrial Park 10,096.73 10,096.73 10096.73
7,777,116
7,777,116
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 16,494.09 16,494.09 16,494.09 9,269,844
9,269,844
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
H-W or CW H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Convenience Market with Gas
P

3.10 1.55 2.01 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
T
h

3.10 1.55 2.01 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
Hotel 3.10 1.55 2.01 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38
4 Industrial Park 3.10 1.55 2.01 59.00 28.00 13.00 79 19 2 Parking Lot 3.10 1.55 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 34 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Convenience Market with Gas
Pum
p
s

0.55915
5 0.05621
3 0.18211
4 0.12246
0 0.02165
6 0.00551
0 0.01339
7 0.00952
7 0.00082
5 0.00063
9 0.02490
8 0.00087
0 0.00272
6 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.55915
5 0.05621
3 0.18211
4 0.12246
0 0.02165
6 0.00551
0 0.01339
7 0.00952
7 0.00082
5 0.00063
9 0.02490
8 0.00087
0 0.00272
6 Hotel 0.55915
5 0.05621
3 0.18211
4 0.12246
0 0.02165
6 0.00551
0 0.01339
7 0.00952
7 0.00082
5 0.00063
9 0.02490
8 0.00087
0 0.00272
6 Industrial Park 0.55915
5 0.05621
3 0.18211
4 0.12246
0 0.02165
6 0.00551
0 0.01339
7 0.00952
7 0.00082
5 0.00063
9 0.02490
8 0.00087
0 0.00272
6 Parking Lot 0.55915
5 0.05621
3 0.18211
4 0.12246
0 0.02165
6 0.00551
0 0.01339
7 0.00952
7 0.00082
5 0.00063
9 0.02490
8 0.00087
0 0.00272
6 5.0 Ener
gy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12,067.78
03 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12,067.78
03 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.0216 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900
3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164
5 NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.0216 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900
3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164
5 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 35 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.95774e
+006

0.0160 0.1450 0.1218 8.7000e004 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 157.8361 157.8361 3.0300e- 003 2.8900e- 003 158.7741 Hotel 2.80682e
+006

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e004 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.7824 149.7824 2.8700e- 003 2.7500e- 003 150.6725 Industrial Park 6.75544e
+007

0.3643 3.3115 2.7817 0.0199 0.2517 0.2517 0.2517 0.2517 0.0000 3,604.960 6 3,604.960 6 0.0691 0.0661 3,626.383 1 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.0216 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900 3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164 5 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 36 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.95774e
+006

0.0160 0.1450 0.1218 8.7000e004 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 157.8361 157.8361 3.0300e- 003 2.8900e- 003 158.7741 Hotel 2.80682e
+006

0.0151 0.1376 0.1156 8.3000e004 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 149.7824 149.7824 2.8700e- 003 2.7500e- 003 150.6725 Industrial Park 6.75544e
+007

0.3643 3.3115 2.7817 0.0199 0.2517 0.2517 0.2517 0.2517 0.0000 3,604.960 6 3,604.960 6 0.0691 0.0661 3,626.383 1 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.3956 3.5962 3.0208 0.0216 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.2733 0.0000 3,914.900 3 3,914.900 3 0.0750 0.0718 3,938.164 5 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 37 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pum
p
s
90882 14.7572 1.3600e003 1.6000e- 004 14.8403
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
680859 110.5558 0.0102 1.2400e003 111.1788
Hotel 691428 112.2720 0.0104 1.2500e003 112.9046
Industrial Park 7.23426e
+007
11,746.76
60 1.0829 0.1313 11,812.95
19 Parking Lot 513800 83.4293 7.6900e003 9.3000e- 004 83.8994 Total 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 38 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

56.0 Area Detail
.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pum
p
s
90882 14.7572 1.3600e003 1.6000e- 004 14.8403
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
680859 110.5558 0.0102 1.2400e003 111.1788
Hotel 691428 112.2720 0.0104 1.2500e003 112.9046
Industrial Park 7.23426e
+007
11,746.76
60 1.0829 0.1313 11,812.95
19 Parking Lot 513800 83.4293 7.6900e003 9.3000e- 004 83.8994 Total 12,067.78
03 1.1125 0.1348 12,135.77
49 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 39 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrMitigated 23.2934 1.0400e003 0.1150 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.2388 Unmitigated 23.2934 1.0400e003 0.1150 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.2388

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

2.4782 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

20.8046 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0106 1.0400e003 0.1150 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.2388 Total 23.2934 1.0400e003 0.1150 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.2388 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 40 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
6 7.0 Water Detail
.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

2.4782 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

20.8046 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0106 1.0400e003 0.1150 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.2388 Total 23.2934 1.0400e003 0.1150 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.2388 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 41 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yrMitigated 1,409.739 4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031 6 Unmitigated 1,409.739 4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031 6

7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pum
p
s

0.209144 /

0.128185

0.3161 2.8000e004 1.6000e- 004 0.3717
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

5.06901 /

0.323554

6.0784 6.5700e003 3.9500e- 003 7.4191
Hotel 3.09475 /

0.343861

3.7942 4.0200e003 2.4100e- 003 4.6132
Industrial Park 1203.54 /
0 1,399.550
7 1.5554 0.9369 1,717.627
6 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1,409.739
4 1.5662 0.9434 1,730.031
6 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 42 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pum
p
s

0.209144 /

0.128185

0.3161 2.8000e004 1.6000e- 004 0.3717
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

5.06901 /

0.323554

6.0784 6.5700e003 3.9500e- 003 7.4191
Hotel 3.09475 /

0.343861

8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 43 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 1,362.627 6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852 2
Unmitigated 1,362.627 6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852 2
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
192.37 39.0494 2.3078 0.0000 96.7432
Hotel 66.8 13.5598 0.8014 0.0000 33.5938
Industrial Park 6453.58 1,310.018
4 77.4199 0.0000 3,245.515
2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1,362.627
6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852
2 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 44 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
192.37 39.0494 2.3078 0.0000 96.7432
Hotel 66.8 13.5598 0.8014 0.0000 33.5938
Industrial Park 6453.58 1,310.018 4 77.4199 0.0000 3,245.515 2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1,362.627 6 80.5290 0.0000 3,375.852 2
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Forklifts
9 5 12.0
0 30
0 8
9 0.2
0 Diesel
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 45 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Ve
getation
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr
Forklifts 1.8573 17.4962 24.2339 0.0327 0.9366 0.9366 0.8617 0.8617 0.0000 2,870.473 4 2,870.473 4 0.9284 0.0000 2,893.682 6 Total 1.8573 17.4962 24.2339 0.0327 0.9366 0.9366 0.8617 0.8617 0.0000 2,870.473 4 2,870.473 4 0.9284 0.0000 2,893.682 6 UnMitigated/Mitigated10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:49 AM Page 46 of 46 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE's comment on "Underestimated Land Use Size."Construction Phase - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths."Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Operational Off-Road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Industrial Park 5,204.50 1000sqft 235.60 5,204,500.00
0 Parking Lot 3,670.00 Space 33.03 1,468,000.00
0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 16.70 1000sqft 6.40 16,700.00 0 Hotel 122.00 Room 4.00 73,400.00
0 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 20.00 Pump 3.00 8,100.00 0 1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban6
Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

0.00 4
N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 1 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstructionPhase NumDays 330.00 78.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 2 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4,650.00 1,101.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 465.00 110.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 330.00 78.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 180.00 43.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/28/2046 1/25/2029tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/17/2043 6/21/2028 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/19/2026 4/2/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/23/2045 10/9/2028tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/9/2024 10/31/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/24/2045 10/10/2028tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/20/2026 4/3/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/10/2024 11/1/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/18/2043 6/22/2028 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 330.00 900.00tblGrading AcresOfGrading 64.50 75.00tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 304,000.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 177,144.00 73,400.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,823.50 8,100.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 119.48 235.60tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.38 6.40 tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.07 4.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.06 3.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear 260.00 300.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay 8.00 12.00tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber 0.00 95.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 3 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 616.12 208.86tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 7.20tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.54 1.94tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 472.58 208.86tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 7.20tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.24 1.94tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 470.95 208.86tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.20tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.37 1.94 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 4 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 4.3265 86.4733 39.5564 0.2802 21.4466 1.8257 23.2723 10.1667 1.6943 11.3321 0.0000 29,807.35 78 29,807.35
78 2.8914 3.7538 30,998.28
01 2024 11.8406 83.0195 103.5890 0.4255 28.3134 1.7317 29.3156 7.6612 1.6077 8.6064 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8697 3.7321 45,687.09
52 2025 11.1378 65.5021 98.3602 0.4148 28.3126 0.9062 29.2189 7.6610 0.8548 8.5158 0.0000 43,601.76 15 43,601.76
15 1.5887 3.6418 44,726.74
74 2026 10.6094 64.1547 94.0548 0.4047 28.3120 0.8947 29.2067 7.6607 0.8440 8.5047 0.0000 42,701.80 43 42,701.80
43 1.5361 3.5586 43,800.67
78 2027 10.1237 62.9473 90.3970 0.3950 28.3114 0.8832 29.1946 7.6605 0.8332 8.4937 0.0000 41,819.07 21 41,819.07
21 1.4875 3.4760 42,892.10
76 2028 637.0260 61.9439 87.3634 0.3861 28.3108 0.8721 29.1829 7.6603 0.8227 8.4830 0.0000 41,009.90 57 41,009.90
57 1.4472 3.4000 42,059.29
74 2029 636.9471 1.6687 12.7089 0.0358 4.3284 0.0676 4.3960 1.1481 0.0663 1.2145 0.0000 3,811.625 0 3,811.625 0 0.0796 0.0710 3,834.766 9 Maximum 637.0260 86.4733 103.5890 0.4255 28.3134 1.8257 29.3156 10.1667 1.6943 11.3321 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8914 3.7538 45,687.09
52 Unmitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 5 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.7663 55.2578 44.5044 0.2802 21.4466 0.5027 21.9494 10.1667 0.4854 10.2295 0.0000 29,807.35 78 29,807.35
78 2.8914 3.7538 30,998.28
01 2024 10.6969 56.7120 104.8824 0.4255 28.3134 0.4978 28.7431 7.6612 0.4806 8.0703 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8697 3.7321 45,687.09
52 2025 10.0982 55.2672 99.7358 0.4148 28.3126 0.4195 28.7321 7.6610 0.3994 8.0603 0.0000 43,601.76 15 43,601.76
15 1.5887 3.6418 44,726.74
74 2026 9.5698 53.9198 95.4304 0.4047 28.3120 0.4079 28.7199 7.6607 0.3885 8.0492 0.0000 42,701.80 43 42,701.80
43 1.5361 3.5586 43,800.67
78 2027 9.0842 52.7123 91.7726 0.3950 28.3114 0.3964 28.7078 7.6605 0.3777 8.0382 0.0000 41,819.07 21 41,819.07
21 1.4875 3.4760 42,892.10
76 2028 636.8849 51.7089 88.7390 0.3861 28.3108 0.3854 28.6962 7.6603 0.3673 8.0276 0.0000 41,009.90 57 41,009.90
57 1.4472 3.4000 42,059.29
74 2029 636.8060 0.6519 12.7321 0.0358 4.3284 0.0201 4.3485 1.1481 0.0188 1.1669 0.0000 3,811.625 0 3,811.625 0 0.0796 0.0710 3,834.766 9 Maximum 636.8849 56.7120 104.8824 0.4255 28.3134 0.5027 28.7431 10.1667 0.4854 10.2295 0.0000 44,533.67 38 44,533.67
38 2.8914 3.7538 45,687.09
52 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.54 23.37 -2.24 0.00 0.00 63.38 2.24 0.00 62.55 6.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 6 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.1852 19.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.1458 5.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.2178 6.2442 6.2442 5.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 174.2086 152.9749 309.8674 0.5213 19.5314 7.9018 27.4332 5.2046 7.3914 12.5960 0.0000 64,588.97 64 64,588.97
64 9.3563 1.8230 65,366.14
09 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 7 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.1852 19.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.1458 5.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.2178 6.2442 6.2442 5.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 174.2086 152.9749 309.8674 0.5213 19.5314 7.9018 27.4332 5.2046 7.3914 12.5960 0.0000 64,588.97 64 64,588.97
64 9.3563 1.8230 65,366.14
09 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
9/1/2023 10/31/2023
5 4
3 2
Grading
Grading 11/1/2023
4/2/2024
5 11
0 3
Building Construction
Building Construction
4/3/2024
6/21/2028
5 1101
4 Paving
Paving
6/22/2028 10/9/2028
5 7
8 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 8 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating 10/10/2028 1/25/2029
5 7
8 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.0
0 7
8 0.4
8 Building Construction
Cranes 1 7.0
0 231 0.2
9 Grading
Excavators
2 8.0
0 15
8 0.3
8 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.0
0 8
9 0.2
0 Building Construction
Generator Sets 1 8.0
0 8
4 0.7
4 Grading
Graders 1 8.0
0 18
7 0.41
Paving
Pavers
2 8.0
0 13
0 0.4
2 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.0
0 13
2 0.3
6 Paving
Rollers
2 8.0
0 8
0 0.3
8 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.0
0 24
7 0.4
0 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.0
0 24
7 0.4
0 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.0
0 36
7 0.4
8 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Building Construction
Welders 1 8.0
0 4
6 0.4
5 Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,954,050; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,651,350; Striped Parking Area: 8 8,080
(Architectural Coating
–
s
qft
)
Acres of Gradin
g
(Site Pre
paration Phase
): 75
Acres of Gradin
g
(Grading Phase
): 900
Acres of Pavin
g: 33.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 9 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.0000 10.1304 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308 1 1.1926 3,717.121 9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.9160 1.2660 21.1820 10.1304 1.1647 11.2952 3,687.308 1 3,687.308 1 1.1926 3,717.121 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUse Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7 18.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading
8 20.0
0 0.0
0 38,000.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction
9 2,843.0
0 1,110.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving
6 15.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 569.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 10 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0607 0.0291 0.4906 1.2500e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 128.1058 128.1058 3.5200e- 003 3.1500e- 003 129.1312 Total 0.0607 0.0291 0.4906 1.2500e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 128.1058 128.1058 3.5200e- 003 3.1500e- 003 129.1312 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.0000 10.1304 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0381 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0381 19.9160 0.0621 19.9781 10.1304 0.0621 10.1925 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 11 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0607 0.0291 0.4906 1.2500e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 128.1058 128.1058 3.5200e- 003 3.1500e- 003 129.1312 Total 0.0607 0.0291 0.4906 1.2500e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 128.1058 128.1058 3.5200e- 003 3.1500e- 003 129.1312 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 15.2704 1.4245 16.6949 4.3337 1.3105 5.6442 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 12 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.9374 51.9254 10.9602 0.2167 6.0240 0.4004 6.4245 1.6496 0.3831 2.0327 23,653.54 03 23,653.54
03 0.9432 3.7503 24,794.71
74 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0674 0.0324 0.5451 1.3900e003 0.1521 7.8000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e- 004 0.0411 142.3398 142.3398 3.9100e- 003 3.5000e- 003 143.4791 Total 1.0048 51.9577 11.5052 0.2181 6.1762 0.4012 6.5774 1.6899 0.3838 2.0738 23,795.88 00 23,795.88
00 0.9471 3.7538 24,938.19
65 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.3337 0.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 13 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.9374 51.9254 10.9602 0.2167 6.0240 0.4004 6.4245 1.6496 0.3831 2.0327 23,653.54 03 23,653.54
03 0.9432 3.7503 24,794.71
74 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0674 0.0324 0.5451 1.3900e003 0.1521 7.8000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e- 004 0.0411 142.3398 142.3398 3.9100e- 003 3.5000e- 003 143.4791 Total 1.0048 51.9577 11.5052 0.2181 6.1762 0.4012 6.5774 1.6899 0.3838 2.0738 23,795.88 00 23,795.88
00 0.9471 3.7538 24,938.19
65 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 1.3354 1.3354 1.2286 1.2286 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 15.2704 1.3354 16.6058 4.3337 1.2286 5.5622 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 14 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.9161 50.6137 11.0003 0.2125 6.0226 0.3955 6.4181 1.6491 0.3784 2.0275 23,198.37 75 23,198.37
75 0.9225 3.6785 24,317.61
98 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0630 0.0289 0.5060 1.3500e003 0.1521 7.5000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e- 004 0.0410 138.7506 138.7506 3.5300e- 003 3.2500e- 003 139.8078 Total 0.9791 50.6425 11.5063 0.2138 6.1747 0.3963 6.5710 1.6894 0.3791 2.0685 23,337.12 81 23,337.12
81 0.9260 3.6817 24,457.42
76 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.3337 0.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 15 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.9161 50.6137 11.0003 0.2125 6.0226 0.3955 6.4181 1.6491 0.3784 2.0275 23,198.37 75 23,198.37
75 0.9225 3.6785 24,317.61
98 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0630 0.0289 0.5060 1.3500e003 0.1521 7.5000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e- 004 0.0410 138.7506 138.7506 3.5300e- 003 3.2500e- 003 139.8078 Total 0.9791 50.6425 11.5063 0.2138 6.1747 0.3963 6.5710 1.6894 0.3791 2.0685 23,337.12 81 23,337.12
81 0.9260 3.6817 24,457.42
76 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 16 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.4208 50.3768 15.4984 0.2074 6.6867 0.2828 6.9695 1.9246 0.2705 2.1951 22,254.58 31 22,254.58
31 0.5449 3.2698 23,242.60
82 Worker 8.9483 4.1005 71.9238 0.1912 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.7367 0.0978 5.8344 19,723.39 18 19,723.39
18 0.5015 0.4623 19,873.67
94 Total 10.3691 54.4773 87.4222 0.3986 28.3134 0.3890 28.7023 7.6612 0.3683 8.0295 41,977.97 49 41,977.97
49 1.0464 3.7321 43,116.28
76 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 17 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.4208 50.3768 15.4984 0.2074 6.6867 0.2828 6.9695 1.9246 0.2705 2.1951 22,254.58 31 22,254.58
31 0.5449 3.2698 23,242.60
82 Worker 8.9483 4.1005 71.9238 0.1912 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.7367 0.0978 5.8344 19,723.39 18 19,723.39
18 0.5015 0.4623 19,873.67
94 Total 10.3691 54.4773 87.4222 0.3986 28.3134 0.3890 28.7023 7.6612 0.3683 8.0295 41,977.97 49 41,977.97
49 1.0464 3.7321 43,116.28
76 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2025 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 18 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3697 49.3513 15.1349 0.2031 6.6860 0.2772 6.9631 1.9243 0.2651 2.1894 21,803.31 59 21,803.31
59 0.5336 3.2096 22,773.10
88 Worker 8.4006 3.6811 67.1406 0.1847 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.7367 0.0934 5.8301 19,241.97 12 19,241.97
12 0.4541 0.4323 19,382.14
05 Total 9.7704 53.0325 82.2756 0.3878 28.3126 0.3787 28.6913 7.6610 0.3586 8.0195 41,045.28 71 41,045.28
71 0.9877 3.6418 42,155.24
93 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 19 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3697 49.3513 15.1349 0.2031 6.6860 0.2772 6.9631 1.9243 0.2651 2.1894 21,803.31 59 21,803.31
59 0.5336 3.2096 22,773.10
88 Worker 8.4006 3.6811 67.1406 0.1847 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.7367 0.0934 5.8301 19,241.97 12 19,241.97
12 0.4541 0.4323 19,382.14
05 Total 9.7704 53.0325 82.2756 0.3878 28.3126 0.3787 28.6913 7.6610 0.3586 8.0195 41,045.28 71 41,045.28
71 0.9877 3.6418 42,155.24
93 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2026 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 20 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3220 48.3471 14.8365 0.1989 6.6853 0.2704 6.9557 1.9241 0.2586 2.1827 21,363.63 77 21,363.63
77 0.5219 3.1512 22,315.75
21 Worker 7.9200 3.3380 63.1336 0.1788 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.7367 0.0891 5.8258 18,781.69 23 18,781.69
23 0.4133 0.4074 18,913.42
77 Total 9.2420 51.6850 77.9701 0.3778 28.3120 0.3671 28.6791 7.6607 0.3477 8.0084 40,145.33 00 40,145.33
00 0.9352 3.5586 41,229.17
97 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 21 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3220 48.3471 14.8365 0.1989 6.6853 0.2704 6.9557 1.9241 0.2586 2.1827 21,363.63 77 21,363.63
77 0.5219 3.1512 22,315.75
21 Worker 7.9200 3.3380 63.1336 0.1788 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.7367 0.0891 5.8258 18,781.69 23 18,781.69
23 0.4133 0.4074 18,913.42
77 Total 9.2420 51.6850 77.9701 0.3778 28.3120 0.3671 28.6791 7.6607 0.3477 8.0084 40,145.33 00 40,145.33
00 0.9352 3.5586 41,229.17
97 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2027 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 22 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2795 47.4267 14.5825 0.1946 6.6847 0.2642 6.9488 1.9238 0.2527 2.1765 20,904.75 78 20,904.75
78 0.5085 3.0895 21,838.13
43 Worker 7.4768 3.0509 59.7298 0.1734 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.7367 0.0842 5.8209 18,357.83 99 18,357.83
99 0.3780 0.3865 18,482.47
52 Total 8.7563 50.4776 74.3124 0.3681 28.3114 0.3557 28.6670 7.6605 0.3369 7.9974 39,262.59 77 39,262.59
77 0.8865 3.4760 40,320.60
95 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 23 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2795 47.4267 14.5825 0.1946 6.6847 0.2642 6.9488 1.9238 0.2527 2.1765 20,904.75 78 20,904.75
78 0.5085 3.0895 21,838.13
43 Worker 7.4768 3.0509 59.7298 0.1734 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.7367 0.0842 5.8209 18,357.83 99 18,357.83
99 0.3780 0.3865 18,482.47
52 Total 8.7563 50.4776 74.3124 0.3681 28.3114 0.3557 28.6670 7.6605 0.3369 7.9974 39,262.59 77 39,262.59
77 0.8865 3.4760 40,320.60
95 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2028 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 24 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2422 46.6600 14.3798 0.1906 6.6841 0.2587 6.9428 1.9236 0.2474 2.1710 20,474.74 18 20,474.74
18 0.4986 3.0308 21,390.39
31 Worker 7.0734 2.8142 56.8989 0.1686 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.7367 0.0791 5.8157 17,978.68 95 17,978.68
95 0.3477 0.3692 18,097.40
63 Total 8.3156 49.4742 71.2787 0.3592 28.3108 0.3446 28.6554 7.6603 0.3265 7.9868 38,453.43 13 38,453.43
13 0.8463 3.4000 39,487.79
94 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 25 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2422 46.6600 14.3798 0.1906 6.6841 0.2587 6.9428 1.9236 0.2474 2.1710 20,474.74 18 20,474.74
18 0.4986 3.0308 21,390.39
31 Worker 7.0734 2.8142 56.8989 0.1686 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.7367 0.0791 5.8157 17,978.68 95 17,978.68
95 0.3477 0.3692 18,097.40
63 Total 8.3156 49.4742 71.2787 0.3592 28.3108 0.3446 28.6554 7.6603 0.3265 7.9868 38,453.43 13 38,453.43
13 0.8463 3.4000 39,487.79
94 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.1095 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.0246 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 26 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0373 0.0149 0.3002 8.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 94.8577 94.8577 1.8300e- 003 1.9500e- 003 95.4840 Total 0.0373 0.0149 0.3002 8.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 94.8577 94.8577 1.8300e- 003 1.9500e- 003 95.4840 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.1095 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3899 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 27 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0373 0.0149 0.3002 8.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 94.8577 94.8577 1.8300e- 003 1.9500e- 003 95.4840 Total 0.0373 0.0149 0.3002 8.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 94.8577 94.8577 1.8300e- 003 1.9500e- 003 95.4840 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 28 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.4157 0.5632 11.3878 0.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,598.267 4 3,598.267 4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027 5 Total 1.4157 0.5632 11.3878 0.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,598.267 4 3,598.267 4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 29 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.4157 0.5632 11.3878 0.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,598.267 4 3,598.267 4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027 5 Total 1.4157 0.5632 11.3878 0.0337 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,598.267 4 3,598.267 4 0.0696 0.0739 3,622.027 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 30 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.3368 0.5232 10.8997 0.0329 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.1481 0.0148 1.1630 3,530.177 0 3,530.177 0 0.0643 0.0710 3,552.935 0 Total 1.3368 0.5232 10.8997 0.0329 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.1481 0.0148 1.1630 3,530.177 0 3,530.177 0 0.0643 0.0710 3,552.935 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 31 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 32 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.1852 19.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.1458 5.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 Unmitigated 31.9976 16.6196 130.8355 0.1852 19.5314 0.1567 19.6881 5.2046 0.1458 5.3505 19,846.36 60 19,846.36
60 2.0756 1.3895 20,312.32
53 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Avera
ge Daily Trip Rate Unmiti
gated Miti
gated
Land Use Weekday Saturday
Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Convenience Market with Gas Pum
ps 2,031.00 2,031.00 2031.00 282,840 282,840
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,487.96 3,487.96 3487.96 790,323 790,323 Hotel 878.40 878.40 878.40 419,565 419,565
Industrial Park 10,096.73 10,096.73 10096.73
7,777,116
7,777,116
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 16,494.09 16,494.09 16,494.09 9,269,844
9,269,844
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
H-W or CW H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Convenience Market with Gas
P

3.10 1.55 2.01 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
T
h

3.10 1.55 2.01 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
Hotel 3.10 1.55 2.01 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38
4 Industrial Park 3.10 1.55 2.01 59.00 28.00 13.00 79 19 2 Parking Lot 3.10 1.55 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 33 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Convenience Market with Gas
Pum
p
s

0.55915
5 0.05621
3 0.18211
4 0.12246
0 0.02165
6 0.00551
0 0.01339
7 0.00952
7 0.00082
5 0.00063
9 0.02490
8 0.00087
0 0.00272
6 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 NaturalGas Unmitigated

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 34 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pum
p
s
119.17 1.2900e003 0.0117 9.8100e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 14.1033 Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
8103.39 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e003 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7689.91 0.0829 0.7539 0.6333 4.5200e003 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185081 1.9960 18.1452 15.2419 0.1089 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 35 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

56.0 Area Detail
.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pum
p
s

0.11917 1.2900e003 0.0117 9.8100e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 14.1033 Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

8.10339 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e003 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7.68991 0.0829 0.7539 0.6333 4.5200e003 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185.081 1.9960 18.1452 15.2419 0.1089 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 36 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Unmitigated 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/dayArchitectural
Coating

13.5793 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
113.9978 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0847 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Total 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 37 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

8.0 Waste Detail9.0 O
perational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Forklifts
9 5 12.0
0 30
0 8
9 0.2
0 Diesel
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:48 AM Page 38 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 4
N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 1 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstructionPhase NumDays 330.00 78.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 2 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4,650.00 1,101.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 465.00 110.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 330.00 78.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 180.00 43.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/28/2046 1/25/2029tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/17/2043 6/21/2028 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/19/2026 4/2/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/23/2045 10/9/2028tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/9/2024 10/31/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/24/2045 10/10/2028tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/20/2026 4/3/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/10/2024 11/1/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/18/2043 6/22/2028 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 330.00 900.00tblGrading AcresOfGrading 64.50 75.00tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 304,000.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 177,144.00 73,400.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,823.50 8,100.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 119.48 235.60tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.38 6.40 tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.07 4.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.06 3.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear 260.00 300.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay 8.00 12.00tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber 0.00 95.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 3 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 1.55tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.50 2.01tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 10.00 3.10tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 616.12 208.86tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 7.20tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.54 1.94tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 472.58 208.86tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 7.20tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.24 1.94tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 322.50 101.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 470.95 208.86tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.20tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.37 1.94 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 4 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 4.2745 90.6980 39.6859 0.2802 21.4466 1.8272 23.2738 10.1667 1.6958 11.3321 0.0000 29,805.08 44 29,805.08
44 2.8897 3.7566 30,996.80
46 2024 10.7841 87.1477 95.3183 0.4046 28.3134 1.7331 29.3186 7.6612 1.6090 8.6092 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8679 3.8073 43,557.15
32 2025 10.1521 70.0542 90.8925 0.3947 28.3126 0.9089 29.2215 7.6610 0.8574 8.5184 0.0000 41,507.56 39 41,507.56
39 1.6605 3.7123 42,655.33
39 2026 9.6894 68.5666 87.2096 0.3853 28.3120 0.8971 29.2091 7.6607 0.8462 8.5070 0.0000 40,663.83 98 40,663.83
98 1.6031 3.6251 41,784.19
28 2027 9.2603 67.2372 84.0502 0.3763 28.3114 0.8854 29.1967 7.6605 0.8352 8.4957 0.0000 39,831.83 19 39,831.83
19 1.5501 3.5391 40,925.24
90 2028 636.8733 66.1342 81.4138 0.3679 28.3108 0.8741 29.1849 7.6603 0.8246 8.4849 0.0000 39,067.26 25 39,067.26
25 1.5059 3.4604 40,136.11
86 2029 636.8041 1.7854 11.4582 0.0322 4.3284 0.0676 4.3960 1.1481 0.0663 1.2145 0.0000 3,425.343 0 3,425.343 0 0.0912 0.0812 3,451.815 1 Maximum 636.8733 90.6980 95.3183 0.4046 28.3134 1.8272 29.3186 10.1667 1.6958 11.3321 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8897 3.8073 43,557.15
32 Unmitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 5 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.7144 59.4824 44.6338 0.2802 21.4466 0.5042 21.9509 10.1667 0.4868 10.2295 0.0000 29,805.08 44 29,805.08
44 2.8897 3.7566 30,996.80
46 2024 9.6404 61.4224 96.6118 0.4046 28.3134 0.4992 28.7461 7.6612 0.4820 8.0731 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8679 3.8073 43,557.15
32 2025 9.1125 59.8193 92.2680 0.3947 28.3126 0.4221 28.7348 7.6610 0.4019 8.0629 0.0000 41,507.56 39 41,507.56
39 1.6605 3.7123 42,655.33
39 2026 8.6498 58.3316 88.5852 0.3853 28.3120 0.4103 28.7223 7.6607 0.3908 8.0515 0.0000 40,663.83 98 40,663.83
98 1.6031 3.6251 41,784.19
28 2027 8.2207 57.0022 85.4258 0.3763 28.3114 0.3986 28.7100 7.6605 0.3798 8.0403 0.0000 39,831.83 19 39,831.83
19 1.5501 3.5391 40,925.24
90 2028 636.7322 55.8993 82.7894 0.3679 28.3108 0.3873 28.6981 7.6603 0.3691 8.0294 0.0000 39,067.26 25 39,067.26
25 1.5059 3.4604 40,136.11
86 2029 636.6630 0.7687 11.4814 0.0322 4.3284 0.0201 4.3485 1.1481 0.0188 1.1669 0.0000 3,425.343 0 3,425.343 0 0.0912 0.0812 3,451.815 1 Maximum 636.7322 61.4224 96.6118 0.4046 28.3134 0.5042 28.7461 10.1667 0.4868 10.2295 0.0000 42,379.38 41 42,379.38
41 2.8897 3.8073 43,557.15
32 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.54 21.90 -2.40 0.00 0.00 63.27 2.24 0.00 62.45 6.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 6 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.1712 19.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.1464 5.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.2178 6.2442 6.2442 5.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 163.3226 155.3887 334.2026 0.5074 19.5314 7.9023 27.4337 5.2046 7.3919 12.5966 0.0000 63,091.73 56 63,091.73
56 9.8874 1.9690 63,925.66
71 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 7 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Energy 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mobile 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.1712 19.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.1464 5.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 Offroad 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.2178 6.2442 6.2442 5.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 163.3226 155.3887 334.2026 0.5074 19.5314 7.9023 27.4337 5.2046 7.3919 12.5966 0.0000 63,091.73 56 63,091.73
56 9.8874 1.9690 63,925.66
71 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
9/1/2023 10/31/2023
5 4
3 2
Grading
Grading 11/1/2023
4/2/2024
5 11
0 3
Building Construction
Building Construction
4/3/2024
6/21/2028
5 1101
4 Paving
Paving
6/22/2028 10/9/2028
5 7
8 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 8 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating 10/10/2028 1/25/2029
5 7
8 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.0
0 7
8 0.4
8 Building Construction
Cranes 1 7.0
0 231 0.2
9 Grading
Excavators
2 8.0
0 15
8 0.3
8 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.0
0 8
9 0.2
0 Building Construction
Generator Sets 1 8.0
0 8
4 0.7
4 Grading
Graders 1 8.0
0 18
7 0.41
Paving
Pavers
2 8.0
0 13
0 0.4
2 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.0
0 13
2 0.3
6 Paving
Rollers
2 8.0
0 8
0 0.3
8 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.0
0 24
7 0.4
0 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.0
0 24
7 0.4
0 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.0
0 36
7 0.4
8 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.0
0 9
7 0.3
7 Building Construction
Welders 1 8.0
0 4
6 0.4
5 Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,954,050; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,651,350; Striped Parking Area: 8 8,080
(Architectural Coating
–
s
qft
)
Acres of Gradin
g
(Site Pre
paration Phase
): 75
Acres of Gradin
g
(Grading Phase
): 900
Acres of Pavin
g: 33.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 9 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.0000 10.1304 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308 1 1.1926 3,717.121 9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.9160 1.2660 21.1820 10.1304 1.1647 11.2952 3,687.308 1 3,687.308 1 1.1926 3,717.121 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUse Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7 18.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading
8 20.0
0 0.0
0 38,000.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction
9 2,843.0
0 1,110.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving
6 15.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 569.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 10.0
0 6.5
0 20.0
0 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 10 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0537 0.0358 0.4272 1.1100e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 113.9541 113.9541 4.0500e- 003 3.6100e- 003 115.1305 Total 0.0537 0.0358 0.4272 1.1100e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 113.9541 113.9541 4.0500e- 003 3.6100e- 003 115.1305 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.9160 0.0000 19.9160 10.1304 0.0000 10.1304 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0381 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0381 19.9160 0.0621 19.9781 10.1304 0.0621 10.1925 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 11 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0537 0.0358 0.4272 1.1100e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 113.9541 113.9541 4.0500e- 003 3.6100e- 003 115.1305 Total 0.0537 0.0358 0.4272 1.1100e003 0.1369 7.1000e- 004 0.1376 0.0363 6.5000e- 004 0.0370 113.9541 113.9541 4.0500e- 003 3.6100e- 003 115.1305 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 15.2704 1.4245 16.6949 4.3337 1.3105 5.6442 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 12 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.8931 56.1427 11.1600 0.2169 6.0240 0.4019 6.4260 1.6496 0.3845 2.0341 23,666.99 10 23,666.99
10 0.9409 3.7526 24,808.79
82 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0597 0.0397 0.4747 1.2400e003 0.1521 7.8000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e- 004 0.0411 126.6156 126.6156 4.5000e- 003 4.0100e- 003 127.9228 Total 0.9528 56.1824 11.6347 0.2181 6.1762 0.4027 6.5789 1.6899 0.3853 2.0752 23,793.60 66 23,793.60
66 0.9454 3.7566 24,936.72
11 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.3337 0.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 13 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.8931 56.1427 11.1600 0.2169 6.0240 0.4019 6.4260 1.6496 0.3845 2.0341 23,666.99 10 23,666.99
10 0.9409 3.7526 24,808.79
82 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0597 0.0397 0.4747 1.2400e003 0.1521 7.8000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 7.2000e- 004 0.0411 126.6156 126.6156 4.5000e- 003 4.0100e- 003 127.9228 Total 0.9528 56.1824 11.6347 0.2181 6.1762 0.4027 6.5789 1.6899 0.3853 2.0752 23,793.60 66 23,793.60
66 0.9454 3.7566 24,936.72
11 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 1.3354 1.3354 1.2286 1.2286 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 15.2704 1.3354 16.6058 4.3337 1.2286 5.5622 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 14 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.8716 54.7353 11.1963 0.2126 6.0226 0.3969 6.4195 1.6491 0.3797 2.0288 23,212.64 47 23,212.64
47 0.9201 3.6809 24,332.55
29 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0559 0.0354 0.4428 1.2000e003 0.1521 7.5000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e- 004 0.0410 123.4634 123.4634 4.0900e- 003 3.7300e- 003 124.6763 Total 0.9274 54.7707 11.6391 0.2138 6.1747 0.3977 6.5724 1.6894 0.3804 2.0698 23,336.10 82 23,336.10
82 0.9242 3.6846 24,457.22
92 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 15.2704 0.0000 15.2704 4.3337 0.0000 4.3337 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0621 15.2704 0.1015 15.3720 4.3337 0.1015 4.4352 0.0000 6,009.748 7 6,009.748
7 1.9437 6,058.340
5 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 15 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.8716 54.7353 11.1963 0.2126 6.0226 0.3969 6.4195 1.6491 0.3797 2.0288 23,212.64 47 23,212.64
47 0.9201 3.6809 24,332.55
29 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0559 0.0354 0.4428 1.2000e003 0.1521 7.5000e- 004 0.1529 0.0404 6.9000e- 004 0.0410 123.4634 123.4634 4.0900e- 003 3.7300e- 003 124.6763 Total 0.9274 54.7707 11.6391 0.2138 6.1747 0.3977 6.5724 1.6894 0.3804 2.0698 23,336.10 82 23,336.10
82 0.9242 3.6846 24,457.22
92 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 16 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3714 54.1596 16.2130 0.2076 6.6867 0.2858 6.9725 1.9246 0.2734 2.1979 22,273.35 88 22,273.35
88 0.5424 3.2775 23,263.60
95 Worker 7.9412 5.0281 62.9386 0.1701 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.7367 0.0978 5.8344 17,550.32 64 17,550.32
64 0.5808 0.5298 17,722.73
60 Total 9.3125 59.1877 79.1515 0.3777 28.3134 0.3919 28.7053 7.6612 0.3711 8.0323 39,823.68 52 39,823.68
52 1.1232 3.8073 40,986.34
55 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 17 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3714 54.1596 16.2130 0.2076 6.6867 0.2858 6.9725 1.9246 0.2734 2.1979 22,273.35 88 22,273.35
88 0.5424 3.2775 23,263.60
95 Worker 7.9412 5.0281 62.9386 0.1701 21.6267 0.1062 21.7328 5.7367 0.0978 5.8344 17,550.32 64 17,550.32
64 0.5808 0.5298 17,722.73
60 Total 9.3125 59.1877 79.1515 0.3777 28.3134 0.3919 28.7053 7.6612 0.3711 8.0323 39,823.68 52 39,823.68
52 1.1232 3.8073 40,986.34
55 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2025 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 18 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3197 53.0730 15.8310 0.2033 6.6860 0.2799 6.9658 1.9243 0.2677 2.1920 21,824.17 05 21,824.17
05 0.5311 3.2171 22,796.13
16 Worker 7.4650 4.5115 58.9768 0.1644 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.7367 0.0934 5.8301 17,126.91 91 17,126.91
91 0.5284 0.4952 17,287.70
42 Total 8.7847 57.5846 74.8078 0.3677 28.3126 0.3813 28.6940 7.6610 0.3611 8.0221 38,951.08 96 38,951.08
96 1.0595 3.7123 40,083.83
58 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 19 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3197 53.0730 15.8310 0.2033 6.6860 0.2799 6.9658 1.9243 0.2677 2.1920 21,824.17 05 21,824.17
05 0.5311 3.2171 22,796.13
16 Worker 7.4650 4.5115 58.9768 0.1644 21.6267 0.1015 21.7282 5.7367 0.0934 5.8301 17,126.91 91 17,126.91
91 0.5284 0.4952 17,287.70
42 Total 8.7847 57.5846 74.8078 0.3677 28.3126 0.3813 28.6940 7.6610 0.3611 8.0221 38,951.08 96 38,951.08
96 1.0595 3.7123 40,083.83
58 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2026 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 20 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2710 52.0079 15.5119 0.1992 6.6853 0.2728 6.9581 1.9241 0.2609 2.1850 21,386.35 95 21,386.35
95 0.5193 3.1586 22,340.59
92 Worker 7.0510 4.0890 55.6131 0.1592 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.7367 0.0891 5.8258 16,721.00 59 16,721.00
59 0.4829 0.4665 16,872.09
56 Total 8.3220 56.0969 71.1250 0.3584 28.3120 0.3695 28.6815 7.6607 0.3500 8.0107 38,107.36 54 38,107.36
54 1.0022 3.6251 39,212.69
48 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 21 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2710 52.0079 15.5119 0.1992 6.6853 0.2728 6.9581 1.9241 0.2609 2.1850 21,386.35 95 21,386.35
95 0.5193 3.1586 22,340.59
92 Worker 7.0510 4.0890 55.6131 0.1592 21.6267 0.0968 21.7234 5.7367 0.0891 5.8258 16,721.00 59 16,721.00
59 0.4829 0.4665 16,872.09
56 Total 8.3220 56.0969 71.1250 0.3584 28.3120 0.3695 28.6815 7.6607 0.3500 8.0107 38,107.36 54 38,107.36
54 1.0022 3.6251 39,212.69
48 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2027 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 22 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2274 51.0319 15.2381 0.1949 6.6847 0.2663 6.9510 1.9238 0.2548 2.1786 20,929.04 66 20,929.04
66 0.5059 3.0967 21,864.51
49 Worker 6.6655 3.7356 52.7274 0.1544 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.7367 0.0842 5.8209 16,346.31 10 16,346.31
10 0.4433 0.4424 16,489.23
61 Total 7.8929 54.7675 67.9655 0.3493 28.3114 0.3578 28.6692 7.6605 0.3390 7.9995 37,275.35 75 37,275.35
75 0.9492 3.5391 38,353.75
10 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 23 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.2274 51.0319 15.2381 0.1949 6.6847 0.2663 6.9510 1.9238 0.2548 2.1786 20,929.04 66 20,929.04
66 0.5059 3.0967 21,864.51
49 Worker 6.6655 3.7356 52.7274 0.1544 21.6267 0.0915 21.7182 5.7367 0.0842 5.8209 16,346.31 10 16,346.31
10 0.4433 0.4424 16,489.23
61 Total 7.8929 54.7675 67.9655 0.3493 28.3114 0.3578 28.6692 7.6605 0.3390 7.9995 37,275.35 75 37,275.35
75 0.9492 3.5391 38,353.75
10 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Building Construction - 2028 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 24 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1890 50.2204 15.0162 0.1908 6.6841 0.2606 6.9447 1.9236 0.2493 2.1729 20,500.31 99 20,500.31
99 0.4959 3.0380 21,418.03
74 Worker 6.3106 3.4442 50.3129 0.1501 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.7367 0.0791 5.8157 16,010.46 83 16,010.46
83 0.4091 0.4224 16,146.58
32 Total 7.4996 53.6646 65.3291 0.3410 28.3108 0.3465 28.6573 7.6603 0.3284 7.9887 36,510.78 81 36,510.78
81 0.9050 3.4604 37,564.62
06 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0270 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 25 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1890 50.2204 15.0162 0.1908 6.6841 0.2606 6.9447 1.9236 0.2493 2.1729 20,500.31 99 20,500.31
99 0.4959 3.0380 21,418.03
74 Worker 6.3106 3.4442 50.3129 0.1501 21.6267 0.0859 21.7126 5.7367 0.0791 5.8157 16,010.46 83 16,010.46
83 0.4091 0.4224 16,146.58
32 Total 7.4996 53.6646 65.3291 0.3410 28.3108 0.3465 28.6573 7.6603 0.3284 7.9887 36,510.78 81 36,510.78
81 0.9050 3.4604 37,564.62
06 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.1095 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.0246 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 26 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0333 0.0182 0.2655 7.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 84.4731 84.4731 2.1600e- 003 2.2300e- 003 85.1913 Total 0.0333 0.0182 0.2655 7.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 84.4731 84.4731 2.1600e- 003 2.2300e- 003 85.1913 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayOff-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 1.1095 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3899 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 27 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0333 0.0182 0.2655 7.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 84.4731 84.4731 2.1600e- 003 2.2300e- 003 85.1913 Total 0.0333 0.0182 0.2655 7.9000e004 0.1141 4.5000e- 004 0.1146 0.0303 4.2000e- 004 0.0307 84.4731 84.4731 2.1600e- 003 2.2300e- 003 85.1913 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 28 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.2630 0.6893 10.0697 0.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,204.346 3 3,204.346 3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588 4 Total 1.2630 0.6893 10.0697 0.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,204.346 3 3,204.346 3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 29 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.2630 0.6893 10.0697 0.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,204.346 3 3,204.346 3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588 4 Total 1.2630 0.6893 10.0697 0.0301 4.3284 0.0172 4.3456 1.1481 0.0158 1.1640 3,204.346 3 3,204.346 3 0.0819 0.0846 3,231.588 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.6103 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 30 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1938 0.6399 9.6490 0.0293 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.1481 0.0148 1.1630 3,143.894 9 3,143.894 9 0.0758 0.0812 3,169.983 2 Total 1.1938 0.6399 9.6490 0.0293 4.3284 0.0161 4.3445 1.1481 0.0148 1.1630 3,143.894 9 3,143.894 9 0.0758 0.0812 3,169.983 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 635.4395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 635.4692 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 M
C
itigated Construction On-Site
alEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 31 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 32 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.1712 19.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.1464 5.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 Unmitigated 21.1116 19.0334 155.1707 0.1712 19.5314 0.1573 19.6887 5.2046 0.1464 5.3510 18,349.12 52 18,349.12
52 2.6067 1.5354 18,871.85
15 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Avera
ge Daily Trip Rate Unmiti
gated Miti
gated
Land Use Weekday Saturday
Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Convenience Market with Gas Pum
ps 2,031.00 2,031.00 2031.00 282,840 282,840
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,487.96 3,487.96 3487.96 790,323 790,323 Hotel 878.40 878.40 878.40 419,565 419,565
Industrial Park 10,096.73 10,096.73 10096.73
7,777,116
7,777,116
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 16,494.09 16,494.09 16,494.09 9,269,844
9,269,844
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
H-W or CW H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Convenience Market with Gas
P

3.10 1.55 2.01 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
T
h

3.10 1.55 2.01 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
Hotel 3.10 1.55 2.01 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38
4 Industrial Park 3.10 1.55 2.01 59.00 28.00 13.00 79 19 2 Parking Lot 3.10 1.55 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 33 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Convenience Market with Gas
Pum
p
s

0.55915
5 0.05621
3 0.18211
4 0.12246
0 0.02165
6 0.00551
0 0.01339
7 0.00952
7 0.00082
5 0.00063
9 0.02490
8 0.00087
0 0.00272
6 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 NaturalGas Unmitigated

2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 34 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pum
p
s
119.17 1.2900e003 0.0117 9.8100e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 14.1033 Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
8103.39 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e003 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7689.91 0.0829 0.7539 0.6333 4.5200e003 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185081 1.9960 18.1452 15.2419 0.1089 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 35 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

0.11917 1.2900e003 0.0117 9.8100e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 14.0200 14.0200 2.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 14.1033 Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

8.10339 0.0874 0.7945 0.6673 4.7700e003 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 0.0604 953.3399 953.3399 0.0183 0.0175 959.0051 Hotel 7.68991 0.0829 0.7539 0.6333 4.5200e003 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 0.0573 904.6949 904.6949 0.0173 0.0166 910.0711 Industrial Park 185.081 1.9960 18.1452 15.2419 0.1089 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 1.3790 21,774.18 53 21,774.18
53 0.4173 0.3992 21,903.57
84 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1676 19.7052 16.5524 0.1182 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 1.4976 23,646.24 01 23,646.24
01 0.4532 0.4335 23,786.75
79 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 36 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Unmitigated 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055

13.5793 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
113.9978 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0847 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Total 127.6617 8.3400e003 0.9199 7.0000e- 005 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 3.2700e- 003 1.9769 1.9769 5.1400e- 003 2.1055 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 37 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Apply Water Conservation Strategy

8.0 Waste Detail9.0 O
perational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Forklifts
9 5 12.0
0 30
0 8
9 0.2
0 Diesel
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 38 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Ve
getation
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO
2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Equipment Type lb/day lb/day
Forklifts 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.2178 6.2442 6.2442 5.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 Total 12.3817 116.6418 161.5596 0.2178 6.2442 6.2442 5.7447 5.7447 0.0000 21,094.39 33 21,094.39
33 6.8224 21,264.95
22 UnMitigated/Mitigated10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 7/9/2024 11:40 AM Page 39 of 39 ASIP - No Future Development Included_Tier 4 Mitigation - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.06 Total DPM (lbs) 1450.991562 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.328767123 Total DPM (g) 658169.7724 Construction Duration (days) 122 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.003860976 Total DPM (lbs) 40.10958904 Release Height (meters) 3
Total DPM (g) 18193.70959 Total Acreage 353.5
Start Date 9/1/2023 Max Horizontal (meters) 1,691.49
End Date 1/1/2024 Min Horizontal (meters) 845.74
Construction Days 122 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Setting U
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.21941 Population 528,001 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 1.202246575 Start Date 9/1/2023 Construction Duration (days) 366 End Date 1/25/2029
Total DPM (lbs) 440.0222466 Total Construction Days 1973 Total DPM (g) 199594.091 Total Years of Construction 5.41 Start Date 1/1/2024 Total Years of Operation 24.59
End Date 1/1/2025
Construction Days 366
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1133
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.620821918
Construction Duration (days) 365
Total DPM (lbs) 226.6
Total DPM (g) 102785.76
Start Date 1/1/2025
End Date 1/1/2026
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1256
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.688219178
Construction Duration (days) 365
Total DPM (lbs) 251.2
Total DPM (g) 113944.32
Start Date 1/1/2026
End Date 1/1/2027
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.124
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.679452055
Construction Duration (days) 365
Total DPM (lbs) 248
Total DPM (g) 112492.8
Start Date 1/1/2027
End Date 1/1/2028
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1219
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.667945205
Construction Duration (days) 366
Total DPM (lbs) 244.4679452
Total DPM (g) 110890.6599
Start Date 1/1/2028
End Date 1/1/2029
Construction Days 366
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0045
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.024657534
Construction Duration (days) 24
Total DPM (lbs) 0.591780822
2027
2028
2029
2025
Construction
2023 Total
2024
2026
Attachment C
Total DPM (g) 268.4317808
Start Date 1/1/2029
End Date 1/25/2029
Construction Days 24
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 07/10/24
10:16:56
TITLE: South Airport Industrial, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.386E‐02 g/s 0.306E‐01 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.270E‐08 g/(s‐m2) 0.214E‐07 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 1691.49 meters 5549.51 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 845.74 meters 2774.74 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN
POPULATION: 528001
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters ‐ 5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1‐HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1* 1.000 0.2134 25 925.0 WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Attachment D
********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON: Winter
ALBEDO: 0.35
BOWEN RATIO: 1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

YR MO DY JDY HR
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐
10 01 10 10 01
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50

HT REF TA HT
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

10.0 310.0 2.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1‐HR CONC DIST 1‐HR CONC
(m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1.00 0.1665 2525.00 0.5297E‐01

25.00 0.1682 2550.00 0.5243E‐01

50.00 0.1699 2575.00 0.5189E‐01

75.00 0.1716 2600.00 0.5137E‐01
100.00 0.1732 2625.00 0.5084E‐01
125.00 0.1749 2650.00 0.5033E‐01
150.00 0.1764 2675.00 0.4982E‐01
175.00 0.1780 2700.00 0.4933E‐01
200.00 0.1795 2725.00 0.4884E‐01
225.00 0.1810 2750.00 0.4836E‐01
250.00 0.1817 2775.00 0.4789E‐01
275.00 0.1815 2800.00 0.4743E‐01
300.00 0.1828 2825.00 0.4696E‐01
325.00 0.1841 2850.00 0.4651E‐01
350.00 0.1854 2875.00 0.4606E‐01
375.00 0.1866 2900.00 0.4562E‐01
400.00 0.1878 2925.00 0.4519E‐01
425.00 0.1890 2950.00 0.4477E‐01
450.00 0.1901 2975.00 0.4436E‐01
475.00 0.1912 3000.00 0.4396E‐01
500.00 0.1923 3025.00 0.4356E‐01
525.00 0.1934 3050.00 0.4316E‐01
550.00 0.1945 3075.00 0.4277E‐01
575.00 0.1955 3100.00 0.4239E‐01
600.00 0.1966 3125.00 0.4200E‐01
625.00 0.1976 3150.00 0.4163E‐01
650.00 0.1986 3175.00 0.4125E‐01
675.00 0.1996 3200.00 0.4089E‐01
700.00 0.2006 3225.00 0.4053E‐01
725.00 0.2028 3250.00 0.4018E‐01
750.00 0.2040 3275.00 0.3984E‐01
775.00 0.2071 3300.00 0.3950E‐01
800.00 0.2083 3325.00 0.3916E‐01
825.00 0.2094 3350.00 0.3883E‐01
850.00 0.2120 3375.00 0.3849E‐01
875.00 0.2131 3400.00 0.3817E‐01
900.00 0.2126 3425.00 0.3785E‐01
924.99 0.2134 3450.00 0.3753E‐01
950.00 0.1923 3475.00 0.3722E‐01
975.00 0.1723 3500.00 0.3692E‐01
1000.00 0.1588 3525.00 0.3662E‐01
1025.00 0.1479 3550.00 0.3633E‐01
1050.00 0.1405 3575.00 0.3604E‐01
1075.00 0.1342 3600.00 0.3575E‐01
1100.00 0.1289 3625.00 0.3547E‐01
1125.01 0.1241 3650.00 0.3519E‐01
1150.00 0.1202 3675.00 0.3491E‐01
1175.00 0.1169 3700.00 0.3463E‐01
1200.00 0.1139 3725.00 0.3436E‐01
1225.00 0.1111 3750.00 0.3409E‐01
1250.01 0.1084 3775.00 0.3382E‐01
1275.00 0.1067 3800.00 0.3356E‐01
1300.00 0.1040 3825.00 0.3330E‐01
1325.00 0.1016 3850.00 0.3304E‐01
1350.01 0.9948E‐01 3875.00 0.3279E‐01
1375.00 0.9742E‐01 3900.00 0.3254E‐01
1400.00 0.9546E‐01 3925.00 0.3230E‐01
1425.00 0.9358E‐01 3950.00 0.3206E‐01
1450.00 0.9178E‐01 3975.00 0.3182E‐01
1475.00 0.9006E‐01 4000.00 0.3159E‐01
1500.00 0.8840E‐01 4025.00 0.3136E‐01
1525.00 0.8695E‐01 4050.00 0.3114E‐01
1550.00 0.8565E‐01 4075.00 0.3091E‐01
1575.00 0.8439E‐01 4100.00 0.3069E‐01
1600.00 0.8317E‐01 4125.00 0.3047E‐01
1625.00 0.8197E‐01 4150.00 0.3025E‐01
1650.00 0.8080E‐01 4175.00 0.3003E‐01
1675.00 0.7967E‐01 4200.00 0.2982E‐01
1700.00 0.7856E‐01 4225.00 0.2961E‐01
1725.00 0.7749E‐01 4250.00 0.2940E‐01
1750.00 0.7644E‐01 4275.00 0.2919E‐01
1775.00 0.7542E‐01 4300.00 0.2899E‐01
1800.00 0.7442E‐01 4325.00 0.2879E‐01
1825.00 0.7346E‐01 4350.00 0.2859E‐01
1850.00 0.7249E‐01 4375.00 0.2839E‐01
1875.00 0.7155E‐01 4400.00 0.2820E‐01
1900.00 0.7064E‐01 4425.00 0.2801E‐01
1925.00 0.6975E‐01 4450.00 0.2782E‐01
1950.00 0.6888E‐01 4475.00 0.2763E‐01
1975.00 0.6803E‐01 4500.00 0.2744E‐01
2000.00 0.6720E‐01 4525.00 0.2726E‐01
2025.00 0.6639E‐01 4550.00 0.2708E‐01
2050.00 0.6559E‐01 4575.00 0.2691E‐01
2075.00 0.6480E‐01 4600.00 0.2673E‐01
2100.00 0.6403E‐01 4625.00 0.2655E‐01
2125.00 0.6328E‐01 4650.00 0.2638E‐01
2150.00 0.6253E‐01 4675.00 0.2621E‐01
2175.00 0.6180E‐01 4700.00 0.2603E‐01
2200.00 0.6109E‐01 4725.00 0.2587E‐01
2225.00 0.6040E‐01 4750.00 0.2570E‐01
2250.00 0.5972E‐01 4775.00 0.2553E‐01
2275.00 0.5906E‐01 4800.00 0.2537E‐01
2300.00 0.5840E‐01 4825.00 0.2521E‐01
2325.00 0.5775E‐01 4850.00 0.2505E‐01
2350.00 0.5712E‐01 4875.00 0.2490E‐01
2375.00 0.5649E‐01 4900.00 0.2474E‐01
2400.00 0.5588E‐01 4925.00 0.2459E‐01
2425.00 0.5528E‐01 4950.00 0.2444E‐01
2450.00 0.5469E‐01 4975.00 0.2429E‐01
2475.00 0.5410E‐01 5000.00 0.2414E‐01
2500.00 0.5353E‐01
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐hour, 8‐hour, and 24‐hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1‐hour concentration as referenced in

SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA‐454/R‐92‐019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED
1‐HOUR 3‐HOUR 8‐HOUR 24‐HOUR ANNUAL

CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC
PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN 0.2136 0.2136 0.2136 0.2136 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 932.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.1665 0.1665 0.1665 0.1665 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial StormwaterCompliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment E
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te ri z a ti o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment F
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022
In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022
In the Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009

M EMO RANDU M
To: Geoff Griffin, NorthPoint Development
Mark Enes, AKT Properties
From: Amy Lapin and Jes Stevens
Subject: Airport South Industrial Project Economic
Impact Analysis; EPS #222161
Date: April 6, 2023
Introduction
NorthPoint Development, LLC (NorthPoint) retained
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) to prepare an
economic impact analysis (Analysis) of proposed and potential land uses in the Sacramento Airport South Industrial project (Project). The Project is located in unincorporated Sacramento County (County), northwest of the City of Sacramento (City) and south of the existing Interstate 5 (I-5) Metro Air Park Parkway Interchange. While currently in the unincorporated County, the Project is proposed to be annexed into the City as part of Project entitlements.

The stimulus generated by the proposed and potential land uses in the Project will have a multiplying effect throughout the economy as local businesses, consumers, and employees
associated with the Project make expenditures locally. The purpose of this Analysis is to estimate the quantifiable onetime construction and ongoing annual operational impacts of the Project on the regional economy with respect to jobs, income, and total economic output.1
1 Total economic output refers to the value of goods and services produced in a county as a result of a project’s operations.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2
Project Overview
At full buildout, the 475-acre Project is envisioned to contain almost 6 million building square feet of industrial uses and nearly 100,000 building square feet of highway commercial uses (Total Project), accommodating over 3,500 ongoing jobs onsite (direct jobs). See Table A-1 in Appendix A for a summary of the Project land uses and employment.

The Total Project comprises two components described below, both of which are presented individually and in aggregate throughout this Analysis:
• Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project includes land uses proposed by NorthPoint and AKT Properties consisting of about 4.4 million building square feet of industrial and 100,000 building square feet of highway commercial uses across 353 developable acres (Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project). Development of the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project is anticipated to begin in 2024 and build out over a period of 7 years. • Potential Remaining Development includes 83 developable acres controlled by non-participating property owners. The land use plan and development timing for the remaining acres is unknown at this time. This Analysis is based on the assumption that the Potential Remaining Development will encompass approximately 1.5 million building square feet of future industrial development (Potential Remaining Development), given site characteristics, adjacent land uses in the Project, and a typical Floor Area Ratio (FAR) assumption for industrial development.

Summary of Economic Impacts
The total economic impact of the proposed Project measures the impact of an activity as it “ripples” throughout the regional economy. These effects consist of direct, indirect, and induced impacts and are described in more detail later in this memorandum (refer to the “Economic Impact Modeling Framework” section).

In this Analysis, the regional economy is defined as the County. However, as the Project is anticipated to annex into the City before development, all direct impacts, and a portion of indirect and induced impacts, are estimated to occur in the City. Figure 1 summarizes the estimated economic impacts of the Project in the regional economy, while Table 1 presents the estimated economic impacts in a tabular format.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 3
Figure 1. Economic Impacts of Airport South Industrial (Total Project) Table 1
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisSummary of One-Time and Annual Ongoing Impacts (Rounded 2023$)Item One-Time Construction Impacts [1] $415.2 M $125.8 M $541.0 M One-Time Construction Jobs (Job Years) [2] 2,656 805 3,461 Annual Ongoing Operational Impacts [3] $536.6 M $176.2 M $712.8 M Annual Ongoing Operational Jobs (Annual Average) [4] 3,971 1,311 5,282Total Annual Public-Sector Tax Revenue [5] $11.1 M $2.9 M $14.0 M Economic Impacts of Airport South Project
Proposed
NorthPoint/AKT
Project
Total
Project
Potential
Remaining
Development
Source: IMPLAN, 2021 Dataset; NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS.

One-Time Economic ImpactsAnnual Ongoing Economic ImpactsAnnual Ongoing Public-Sector Tax Revenues [1] Includes direct and indirect impacts.[2] Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Job years refer to the number of jobs in each year summed over the entire construction period of the Project. [3] Includes direct, indirect, and induced Impacts of the anticipated land uses within the Project.[4] Reflects stabilized operational employment for the Project. Refer to Table A-1 for details. Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers.
[5] Reflects estimated tax revenue generated for the City of Sacramento, jurisdictions and taxing entities in Sacramento County, and the State of California. Estimated public sector tax revenue is a component ofannual ongoing economic activity from stabilized operations and not additive to the economic impactsreflected above.

Prepared by EPS 4/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222161 Sacramento Aiport South EIA\Models\222161 EIA m01 03-29-23 4 Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 5
Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project
• One-Time Construction Impacts. Construction is anticipated to generate $415.2 million in one-time economic impacts and support 2,656 job years.2 • Annual Ongoing Impacts. Once the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project has reached stabilized operations, it is estimated to generate $536.6 million annually in total economic impacts, supporting an annual average of 3,971 jobs in the County, inclusive of direct jobs onsite and all indirect and induced jobs supported by the development. • Annual Public-Sector Tax Revenues. The Project is anticipated to generate $11.1 million annually in tax revenue to support public-sector operations, including $3.3 million generated for the City. An additional $6.4 million and $1.4 million is estimated to accrue to Sacramento County (and other taxing entities in the County) and the State, respectively. Public-sector revenues are included in ongoing economic impacts as estimated.

Potential Remaining Development
The following impacts are estimated if the Potential Remaining Development builds out as identified in this Analysis:
• One-Time Construction Impacts. Construction is anticipated to generate $125.8 million in one-time economic impacts and support 805 job years.3 • Annual Ongoing Impacts. Once the Potential Remaining Development has reached stabilized operations, it is estimated to generate $176.2 million annually in total economic impacts, supporting an annual average of 1,311 jobs in the County, inclusive of direct jobs onsite and all indirect and induced jobs supported by the development.
• Annual Public-Sector Tax Revenues. The Potential Remaining Development is anticipated to generate $2.9 million annually in tax revenue to support public-sector operations, including $741,000 generated for the City. An additional $2.0 million and $98,000 is estimated to accrue to Sacramento County (and other taxing entities in the County) and the State, respectively.

Public-sector revenues are included in ongoing economic impacts as estimated. 2 Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Job years refer to the number of jobs in each year summed over the entire construction period of the Project. For example, a single worker employed for 2 years would equate to 2 job years. 3 Ibid.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 6
Total Project
In aggregate, development of the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project and Potential Remaining Development components will generate the following impacts:
• One-Time Construction Impacts. Construction at full buildout is anticipated to generate $541.0 million in one-time economic impacts and support 3,461 job years.4
• Annual Ongoing Impacts. Once the Total Project has reached stabilized operations, it is estimated to generate $712.8 million annually in total economic impacts, supporting an annual average of 5,282 jobs in the County, inclusive of direct jobs onsite and all indirect and induced jobs. • Annual Public-Sector Tax Revenues. The Total Project is anticipated to generate $14.0 million annually in tax revenue to support public-sector operations, including $4.0 million generated for the City. An additional $8.5 million and $1.5 million is estimated to accrue to Sacramento County (and other taxing entities in the County) and the State, respectively. Public-sector revenues are included in ongoing economic impacts as estimated.

Detailed Project Description
The proposed 475-acre Project is in the unincorporated County and is located along Bayou Road, south of I-5 and southeast of the Sacramento International Airport (SMF). See Map 1. Metro Air Park (MAP), an 1,892-acre Industrial Business Park, and the Northlake development (formerly Greenbriar) are located directly to the north of the Project site. Undeveloped agricultural and mitigation lands lie south of the Project. Other surrounding existing uses include the Life Storage Facility and Westlake subdivision, the West Drainage Canal, the Paso Verde School, and undeveloped SMF Master Plan Commercial land.

The Project is easily accessible from one of Sacramento’s primary transportation corridors, I-5, via the recently constructed Phase 1 configuration of the MAP Interchange. Future interchange improvements will increase the 2-lane overcrossing of I-5 by 2 additional lanes, creating a 4-lane overcrossing accompanied by on- and off-ramp capacity improvements.
4 Ibid.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 7
The Project proposes the abandonment of South Bayou Way and replacement with a new internal roadway system (Airport South Industrial Drive), which will be designed and constructed to the City’s local industrial standards. If South Bayou Way is left in its current onsite alignment, the roadway would not meet the City’s local industrial standards. Roadway improvements would also include a roundabout to guide truck traffic directly to I-5 and will prohibit off-site truck traffic from Airport South Industrial Drive.

Across approximately 350 acres, the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project includes 5 buildings of industrial development, retention basins and buffer lots, and an internal roadway system. In addition, the proposed Project includes approximately 100,000 building square feet of highway commercial development.

See Figure 2. This commercial development will serve local, regional, and interstate travelers with the inclusion of multiple restaurants, a gas station and carwash, and a 3- to 4-story hotel.

The Potential Remaining Development includes approximately 80 acres owned by non-participating property owners. For the purpose of this Analysis, this component of the Project is estimated to accommodate 1.5 million building square feet of industrial space, based on a FAR of 0.42.

Map 1
Project Location
Note: Project Site boundaries are approximate.

Project Site
Figure 2. Project Site Plan
Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 10
Economic Impact Analysis Results
This Analysis quantifies these impacts using an input/output (I/O) economic modeling system, which measures the change in regional economic activity resulting from a specific economic stimulus. Economic impacts using an I/O model are based on an initial change in output or employment in a specific industry sector. The model then translates the initial change into changes in demand for output from other interdependent sectors, corresponding changes in demand for inputs to those sectors, and so on.

The effects stemming from the change in regional economic activity are commonly described as direct, indirect, or induced impacts. In addition, this Analysis includes an estimate of revenues generated by the Project to the public sector, including the City and the State of California (State), and provides a qualitative description of other benefits conferred by the Project. Figure 3 illustrates the ongoing, annual activities captured by this Analysis.

Figure 3. Ongoing Annual Economic Impact Analysis Components

DIRECT IMPACTS INDIRECT IMPACTS INDUCED IMPACTS
Operating revenues and
employment
Example: Annual sales
revenues from onsite
businesses and restaurants.

Business-to-business
transactions
Example: Users purchase
goods, such as office supplies
and equipment, generating
sales for other local
businesses.

Spending of employee income
Example: An employee
spends their salary on
groceries and household
expenses, generating sales for
other local businesses.

Total Economic Impacts
Source: EPS.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 11
One-Time Construction Economic Impact Results
One-time economic impacts are generated by Project construction activity and are limited to the Project construction development period. To the extent that construction activity is short term and construction labor markets are tight, construction impacts may represent a shift of resources from other construction projects in the County. This Analysis therefore reports gross economic impacts, not accounting for potential shifts in resources. In addition, to the extent that construction labor is used temporarily, and laborers may live outside of the County, this Analysis is based on the assumption that construction activities exclude induced impacts (e.g., household income spent on goods and services in the County). The following sections outline the one-time construction impacts for each component of the Project.

Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project
Construction impacts are based on the estimated hard construction costs for the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project of $342.3 million, as shown on Table A-2 in Appendix A. One-time economic impacts stemming from construction are estimated to generate total output of $415.2 million (measured in 2023 dollars). It is anticipated that construction will generate 2,656 job years over the anticipated construction timeline, including 2,338 direct and 318 indirect job years.5
Potential Remaining Development
If the Potential Remaining Development develops as anticipated in this Analysis, one-time economic impacts stemming from construction are estimated to generate total output of $125.9 million (measured in 2023 dollars). It is anticipated that construction will generate 805 job years over the anticipated construction timeline, including 709 direct and 96 indirect job years.6 The construction impacts of the Potential Remaining Development are based on the estimated hard construction costs of $103.8 million, as shown on Table A-2 in Appendix A.

Total Project
At full buildout of the Total Project as envisioned in this Analysis, one-time economic impacts stemming from construction are based on the estimated hard construction costs as shown on Table A-2 in Appendix A and are estimated to generate total output of $541.0 million (measured in 2023 dollars). 5 Note that the employment figures reported for construction impacts represent total job years lasting the duration of the Project and could reflect the same job that extends over multiple years. For instance, a general laborer employed for 2 years during construction activity would represent 2 job years.
6 Ibid.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 12
It is anticipated that construction will generate 3,461 job years over the anticipated construction timeline, including 3,046 direct and 415 indirect job years.7
Annual Ongoing Economic Impact Results
Ongoing economic impacts are measured on a gross annual impact basis, not accounting for shifts in consumer expenditures from other local alternatives.

Total economic activity is based on the anticipated stabilized operational employment at buildout for each component of the Project and is estimated to be generated in the County annually, inclusive of employee compensation.8 This level of annual, ongoing economic output represents direct, indirect, and induced impacts.

Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project
The Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project is estimated to generate $536.6 million in total economic output annually and result in approximately 3,971 full- and part-time jobs in the County. As a result of ongoing, annual operations, the estimated full- and part-time jobs include 2,645 direct (on-site) jobs, 751 indirect, and 575 induced jobs. These full- and part-time jobs are estimated to generate approximately $227.8 million in earned employee compensation (wages and benefits) annually.

Potential Remaining Development
If the Potential Remaining Development develops as anticipated in this Analysis, it is estimated to generate $176.2 million in total economic output annually and result in approximately 1,311 full- and part-time jobs in the County.

As a result of ongoing, annual operations, the estimated full- and part-time jobs include 872 direct (on-site) jobs, 248 indirect, and 191 induced jobs. These fulland part-time jobs are estimated to generate approximately $75.6 million in earned employee compensation (wages and benefits) annually.

Total Project
At full buildout as envisioned in this Analysis, the Total Project is estimated to generate $712.8 million in total economic output annually and result in approximately 5,282 full- and part-time jobs in the County. As a result of ongoing, annual operations, the estimated full- and part-time jobs include 3,517 direct (on-site) jobs, 999 indirect, and 766 induced jobs. These full- and part-time jobs are estimated to generate approximately $303.4 million in earned employee compensation (wages and benefits) annually. 7 Ibid.
8 Stabilized operational employment includes both full-time and part-time workers.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 13
Annual Public-Sector Tax Revenues
The Project will generate annual tax revenues that will flow to the City, jurisdictions and taxing entities in the County, and the State. This Analysis focuses on major sources of tax revenue for the City and the State only, including property tax (including property tax in lieu of vehicle license fee revenues), sales tax and public safety sales tax, and transient occupancy tax revenues. Estimated public-sector tax revenue is a component of annual ongoing economic activity from stabilized operations and is not additive to the total economic output described above.

Because the specific types of industrial users are unknown at this time, this Analysis is based on the assumption future tenants of the proposed and potential industrial space will not generate taxable sales onsite. It should be noted that some industrial tenants (e.g., e-commerce tenants) may fulfill sales on behalf of an owner of goods sold or may be a direct seller, both of which would generate onsite taxable sales. EPS’s evaluation of recent taxable sales generated by some warehouse and distribution tenants illustrates potential taxable sales of $10 to $50 per square foot, depending on the specific tenant and the types of goods sold onsite. In this scenario, the Project has the potential to generate significantly more sales tax revenue to the City and the State than shown in this Analysis.

Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project
It is estimated that the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project will generate approximately $11.1 million in public-sector tax revenues annually (measured in 2023 dollars). Of the revenue generated, $3.3 million is estimated to be retained by the City, $6.4 million is estimated to accrue to other taxing entities, and $1.4 million is estimated to accrue to the State.

Potential Remaining Development
If the Potential Remaining Development develops like this Analysis anticipates, it is estimated to generate approximately $2.9 million in public-sector tax revenues annually (measured in 2023 dollars). Of the revenue generated, $741,000 is estimated to be retained by the City, $2.0 million is estimated to accrue to other taxing entities, and $98,000 is estimated to accrue to the State.

Total Project
At full buildout as envisioned in this Analysis, it is estimated that the Total Project will generate approximately $14.0 million in public-sector tax revenues annually (measured in 2023 dollars). Of the revenue generated, $4.0 million is estimated to be retained by the City, $8.5 million is estimated to accrue to other taxing entities, and $1.5 million is estimated to accrue to the State.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 14
Detailed Analysis Findings and Assumptions
The following section provides the detailed results of the Analysis, as well as the assumptions used to calculate each impact.

One-Time Construction Impacts
Impacts associated with construction of the Project through buildout are measured on a one-time basis. Construction activity generates a short-term burst of economic activity that dissipates once construction is complete. One-time impacts include the value of new construction, improvements to existing infrastructure, employment created, and income earned during construction.

Duration of one-time impacts is limited to the development period of the Project.

One-time economic impacts are calculated based on the anticipated hard construction costs, excluding soft costs, which are excluded because these costs are considered to be indirect costs and as such are included in the indirect onetime impacts of the Project. Based on information provided by NorthPoint and AKT Properties, it is estimated that construction of the Project will incur approximately $446 million in hard construction costs. Refer to Table A-2 in Appendix A for a detailed allocation of construction costs by land use type.

The section below details the results of the one-time economic impacts for construction of the Project.

One-Time Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project Construction Table 2 details the estimated one-time economic impacts associated with construction of Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project. The resulting impacts are described below:
 Annual Output. Construction operations are estimated to generate approximately $342.3 million in direct one-time industry output. Local spending will result in $72.9 million in indirect one-time impacts for a total one-time industry output impact of $415.2 million.
 Employee Compensation. Of the $342.3 million in direct industry output reported above, approximately $187.7 million will be received by construction employees in the form of salary, wages, and benefits. Indirect employee compensation impacts total approximately $24.1 million for a total annual employee compensation impact of approximately $211.8 million.  Annual Employment. The 2,338 direct job years support approximately 318 indirect job years for a total employment impact of approximately 2,656 job years.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
One-Time Potential Remaining Development Construction
Table 3 details the estimated one-time economic impacts associated with construction of the Potential Remaining Development if it develops as anticipated in this Analysis. The resulting impacts are described below:
 Annual Output. Construction operations are estimated to generate approximately $103.8 million in direct one-time industry output. Local spending will result in $22.1 million in indirect one-time impacts for a total one-time industry output impact of $125.9 million.
 Employee Compensation. Of the $103.8 million in direct industry output reported above, approximately $56.9 million will be received by construction employees in the form of salary, wages, and benefits. Indirect employee compensation impacts total approximately $7.3 million for a total annual employee compensation impact of approximately $64.2 million.  Annual Employment. The 709 direct job years support approximately 96 indirect job years for a total employment impact of approximately 805 job years.

One-Time Total Project Construction
Table 4 details the estimated one-time economic impacts associated with construction of the Total Project at full buildout as envisioned in this Analysis.

The resulting impacts are described below:
 Annual Output. Construction operations are estimated to generate approximately $446.0 million in direct one-time industry output. Local spending will result in $95.0 million in indirect one-time impacts for a total one-time industry output impact of $541.0 million.
 Employee Compensation. Of the $446.0 million in direct industry output reported above, approximately $244.5 million will be received by construction employees in the form of salary, wages, and benefits. Indirect employee compensation impacts total approximately $31.4 million for a total annual employee compensation impact of approximately $275.9 million.  Annual Employment. The 3,046 direct job years support approximately 415 indirect job years for a total employment impact of approximately 3,461 job years.

Table 2
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisOne-Time Impacts of Project Construction - NorthPoint/AKT (Rounded 2023$) Direct Indirect Induced [1]
Activity/Impact Categories Source (Project Construction) (Construction Suppliers) NAKey Input Project Construction Costs (Rounded) Table A-2 $342,300,000 One-Time Construction Impacts
Economic Output in Sacramento County [2]
Industry Output (excl. Income) $154,600,000 $48,790,000 - $203,390,000 Income [3] $187,700,000 $24,080,000 - $211,780,000
Total Output $342,300,000 $72,870,000 - $415,170,000
Construction Employment in Sacramento County (Job years) [4] 2,338 318 - 2,656 [3] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (industry profits, rents, and royalties).[4] Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Job years refer to the number of jobs in each year summed over the entire construction period of the Project. For example, a single worker employed for 2 years would equate to 2 job years.

One-Time Construction Impacts
NorthPoint/AKT
Impact Type
[2] Analysis based on Sacramento County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy.
[1] Note that total construction Impacts include direct and indirect impacts only; induced impacts were not estimated because construction activities are temporary and thus are not anticipated to generate net new household expenditures in the local economy.

Source: IMPLAN, 2021 Dataset; NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS Total
One-Time
Construction
Impacts
Prepared by EPS 4/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222161 Sacramento Aiport South EIA\Models\222161 EIA m01 03-29-23 16 Table 3
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisOne-Time Impacts of Project Construction - Potential Remaining Development (Rounded 2023$) Direct Indirect Induced [1]
Activity/Impact Categories Source
(Project
Construction)
(Construction
Suppliers)
NA
Key Input
Project Construction Costs Table A-2 $103,758,344
One-Time Construction Impacts
Economic Output in Sacramento County [2]
Industry Output (excl. Income) $46,860,000 $14,790,000 - $61,650,000 Income [3] $56,900,000 $7,300,000 - $64,200,000Total Output $103,760,000 $22,090,000 - $125,850,000 Construction Employment in Sacramento County (Job years) [4] 709 96 - 805 [3] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (industry profits, rents, and royalties).[2] Analysis based on Sacramento County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy.
[4] Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Job years refer to the number of jobs in each year summed over the entire construction period of the Project. For example, a single worker employed for 2 years would equate to 2 job years.

One-Time Construction Impacts
Potential Remaining
Development
[1] Note that total construction impacts include direct and indirect impacts only; induced impacts were not estimated because construction activities are temporary and thus are not anticipated to generate net new household expenditures in the local economy.

Impact Type Total
One-Time
Construction
Impacts
Source: IMPLAN, 2021 Dataset; NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS Prepared by EPS 4/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222161 Sacramento Aiport South EIA\Models\222161 EIA m01 03-29-23 17 Table 4
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisOne-Time Impacts of Project Construction - Total Project (Rounded 2023$) Direct Indirect Induced [1]
Activity/Impact Categories Source
(Project
Construction)
(Construction
Suppliers)
NA
Key Input
Project Construction Costs Table A-2 $446,000,000
One-Time Construction Impacts
Economic Output in Sacramento County [2]
Industry Output (excl. Income) $201,440,000 $63,570,000 - $265,010,000 Income [3] $244,560,000 $31,380,000 - $275,940,000
Total Output $446,000,000 $94,950,000 - $540,950,000
Construction Employment in Sacramento County (Job years) [4] 3,046 415 - 3,461 [3] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (industry profits, rents, and royalties).[2] Analysis based on Sacramento County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy.
[4] Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Job years refer to the number of jobs in each year summed over the entire estimated 7-year construction period of the Project. For example, a single worker employed for 2 years would equate to 2 job years.

One-Time Construction Impacts
Total Project
[1] Note that total construction impacts include direct and indirect impacts only; induced impacts were not estimated because construction activities are temporary and thus are not anticipated to generate net new household expenditures in the local economy.

Impact Type Total
One-Time
Construction
Impacts
Source: IMPLAN, 2021 Dataset; NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS.

Prepared by EPS 4/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222161 Sacramento Aiport South EIA\Models\222161 EIA m01 03-29-23 18 Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 19
Ongoing Operations
This report estimates the ongoing economic impacts occurring annually as a result of stabilized Project operations. Ongoing economic impacts capture the direct, indirect, and induced impacts generated by the combination of businesses located in the Project. Impacts associated with these economic activities are estimated based on estimates of standardized operational employment.

Total employment estimates are based on an assumed employment density for each of the land uses of the Project: industrial, lodging, gas stations, and restaurants. At full buildout, the Total Project is estimated to have 3,517 onsite employees. See Table A-1 in Appendix A. Industrial warehouse uses can have a wide range of employment densities (anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000+ square feet per employee). This Analysis uses an employment density of 1,750 building square feet per employee for industrial land uses. For lodging, gas stations, and restaurants, an average of 1,000, 750, and 500 building square feet per employee, respectively, was used to estimate onsite employment.

Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project
Of the 3,517 onsite employees at full buildout, EPS estimates 2,645 employees will be generated from the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project. When broken down by land uses, 2,530 employees are estimated to be employed in industrial spaces, 81 employees are estimated to be employed in lodging, 7 in gas stations, and 27 at restaurants. The precise division of jobs by full- or part-time employment is unknown at this time.

Potential Remaining Development
If the Potential Remaining Development develops consistent with the assumptions in this Analysis, then an additional 872 employees are estimated to be employed in the additional industrial businesses.

Total Project
Upon full buildout of the Total Project as envisioned in this Analysis, 3,402 onsite industrial employees are estimated to be employed by the Project, 81 employees are estimated to be employed in lodging, 7 in gas stations, and 27 at restaurants.

The precise division of jobs by full- or part-time employment is unknown at this time.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 20
Ongoing Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project Operations Table 5 summarizes the total estimated annual ongoing impacts associated with the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project operations. The resulting impacts are described below:
 Annual Output. Operations are estimated to generate approximately $288.8 million in direct industry output annually. Local spending will result in approximately $142.4 million in indirect industry output impacts and $105.5 million in induced impacts annually for a total industry output impact of $536.6 million on an annual basis.
 Employee Compensation. Of the $288.8 million in direct industry output reported above, approximately $144.1 million will be received by employees in the form of salary, wages, and benefits. Indirect and induced employee compensation impacts total approximately $83.7 million for a total annual employee compensation impact of approximately $227.8 million.  Annual Employment. The 2,645 direct employees will generate approximately 751 indirect and 575 induced jobs annually for a total employment impact of approximately 3,971 jobs on an annual basis.

Ongoing economic impacts are based on the onsite operations of the Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Properties Project.

Ongoing Potential Remaining Development Operations
Table 6 summarizes the total estimated annual ongoing impacts associated with Potential Remaining Development operations as anticipated in this Analysis. The resulting impacts are described below:
 Annual Output. Operations are estimated to generate approximately $94.2 million in direct industry output annually. Local spending will result in approximately $47.0 million in indirect industry output impacts and $35.0 million in induced impacts annually for a total industry output impact of $176.2 million on an annual basis.
 Employee Compensation. Of the $94.2 million in direct industry output reported above, approximately $47.9 million will be received by employees in the form of salary, wages, and benefits. Indirect and induced employee compensation impacts total approximately $27.7 million for a total annual employee compensation impact of approximately $75.6 million.  Annual Employment. The 872 direct employees will generate approximately 248 indirect and 191 induced jobs annually for a total employment impact of approximately 1,311 jobs on an annual basis.

Ongoing economic impacts are based on the onsite operations of the Potential Remaining Development.

Airport South Industrial Project Economic Impact Analysis April 6, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 21
Ongoing Total Project Operations
Table 7 summarizes the total estimated annual ongoing impacts associated with Total Project operations upon full buildout as anticipated in this Analysis. The resulting impacts are described below:
 Annual Output. Total Project operations are estimated to generate approximately $383.0 million in direct industry output annually. Local spending will result in approximately $189.4 million in indirect industry output impacts and $140.4 million in induced impacts annually for a total industry output impact of $712.8 million on an annual basis.
 Employee Compensation. Of the $383.0 million in direct industry output reported above, approximately $192.0 million will be received by employees in the form of salary, wages, and benefits. Indirect and induced employee compensation impacts total approximately $111.3 million for a total annual employee compensation impact of approximately $303.4 million.  Annual Employment. The 3,517 direct employees will generate approximately 999 indirect and 766 induced jobs annually for a total employment impact of approximately 5,282 jobs on an annual basis.

Ongoing economic impacts are based on onsite operations of the Total Project.

Public-Sector Revenues
The Total Project will generate revenues to the City, to the County and other taxing entities in the County, and to the State. This Analysis focuses on major sources of tax revenues, including property tax and sales tax revenues, as shown in Table 8. In total, the Project is anticipated to generate $14.0 million in publicsector tax revenue. Of the revenue generated, $4.0 million will be retained by the City, $8.5 million will accrue to Sacramento County (and other taxing entities in the County), and another $1.5 million benefitting the State.

The Analysis estimates additional public-sector revenues using a marginalrevenue case-study approach, which simulates actual revenue generation resulting from new development. The estimated annual ongoing economic impacts include an estimate of some local tax revenues. The public-sector revenue calculated in the Analysis provides a more detailed and complete picture of local/ regional public-sector revenues generated by the Project. The following sections detail the additional public-sector tax revenues generated by the Project and the case-study methodologies used to calculate each revenue source.

Table 5
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisAnnual Impacts of the Ongoing Project Operations - NorthPoint/AKT (Rounded 2023$) Direct Indirect Induced
Activity/Impact Categories Source
(Project
Operations)
(Business to
Business Activity to
Support Project
Operations)
(Household Spending
from Project
Employment)
Key Input
Ongoing Project Employees Table A-1 2,645
Annual Ongoing Operating Impacts
Economic Output in Sacramento County [1]
Industry Output (excl. Income) $144,690,000 $94,500,000 $69,690,000 $308,880,000 Income [2] $144,110,000 $47,890,000 $35,760,000 $227,760,000Total Sacramento County Output $288,800,000 $142,390,000 $105,450,000 $536,640,000 Employment in Sacramento County
(Annual Average) [3] 2,645 751 575 3,971
Ongoing Economic Impacts
NorthPoint/AKT
Impact Type
[1] Analysis based on Sacramento County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy.[2] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (profits, rents, and royalties).[3] Reflects stabilized operational employment in the Project. Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers.

Total
Annual
Ongoing
Impacts
Source: IMPLAN, 2021 Dataset; NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS.

Prepared by EPS 4/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222161 Sacramento Aiport South EIA\Models\222161 EIA m01 03-29-23 22 Table 6
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisAnnual Impacts of the Ongoing Project Operations - Potential Remaining Development (Rounded 2023$) Direct Indirect Induced
Activity/Impact Categories Source
(Project
Operations)
(Business to
Business Activity to
Support Project
Operations)
(Household Spending
from Project
Employment)
Key Input
Ongoing Project Employees Table A-1 872
Annual Ongoing Operating Impacts
Economic Output in Sacramento County [1]
Industry Output (excl. Income) $46,290,000 $31,150,000 $23,120,000 $100,560,000 Income [2] $47,920,000 $15,830,000 $11,860,000 $75,610,000Total Sacramento County Output $94,210,000 $46,980,000 $34,980,000 $176,170,000 Employment in Sacramento County
(Annual Average) [3] 872 248 191 1,311
Ongoing Economic Impacts
Potential Remaining
Development
Impact Type
[1] Analysis based on Sacramento County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy.[2] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (profits, rents, and royalties).[3] Reflects stabilized operational employment in the Project. Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers.

Total
Annual
Ongoing
Impacts
Source: IMPLAN, 2021 Dataset; NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS.

Prepared by EPS 4/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222161 Sacramento Aiport South EIA\Models\222161 EIA m01 03-29-23 23 Table 7
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisAnnual Impacts of the Ongoing Project Operations - Total Project (Rounded 2023$) Direct Indirect Induced
Activity/Impact Categories Source
(Project
Operations)
(Business to
Business Activity to
Support Project
Operations)
(Household Spending
from Project
Employment)
Key Input
Ongoing Project Employees Table A-1 3,517
Annual Ongoing Operating Impacts
Economic Output in Sacramento County [1]
Industry Output (excl. Income) $190,980,000 $125,650,000 $92,810,000 $409,440,000 Income [2] $192,030,000 $63,720,000 $47,620,000 $303,370,000Total Sacramento County Output $383,010,000 $189,370,000 $140,430,000 $712,810,000 Employment in Sacramento County
(Annual Average) [3] 3,517 999 766 5,282
Ongoing Economic Impacts
Total Project
Impact Type
Total
Annual
Ongoing
Impacts
Source: IMPLAN, 2021 Dataset; NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS. [1] Analysis based on Sacramento County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy.[2] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (profits, rents, and royalties).[3] Reflects stabilized operational employment in the Project. Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers.

Prepared by EPS 4/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222161 Sacramento Aiport South EIA\Models\222161 EIA m01 03-29-23 24 Table 8
Airport South IndustrialEconomic Impact AnalysisDetailed Summary of Annual Public-Sector Revenues (Rounded 2023$)Revenue Category Source City of
Sacramento
Sacramento
County & Other
Local Taxing
Entities
State of
California Total
Annual Public-Sector Tax Revenues
Proposed NorthPoint/AKT Project
Property Tax Table B-1 $1,594,100 $5,459,400 - $7,053,500 Property Tax In Lieu of Motor Vehicle License Fee Revenue Table B-1 $615,200 $751,000 - $1,366,200 Sales Tax [1] Table B-3 $427,700 $124,800 $1,410,900 $1,963,400 Prop. 172 Public Safety Sales Tax Table B-3 $14,100 $98,800 - $112,900Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Table B-8 $625,500 - - $625,500Total Annual Tax Revenues Generated by the Project $3,276,600 $6,434,000 $1,410,900 $11,121,500 Potential Remaining Development
Property Tax Table B-1 $517,300 $1,771,500 - $2,288,800 Property Tax In Lieu of Motor Vehicle License Fee Revenue Table B-1 $199,600 $243,700 - $443,300Sales Tax [1] Table B-4 $23,500 $11,800 $98,100 $133,400 Prop. 172 Public Safety Sales Tax Table B-4 $800 $7,100 - $7,900 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Table B-8 - - - -
Total Annual Tax Revenues Generated by the Project $741,200 $2,034,100 $98,100 $2,873,400 Total Project
Property Tax Table B-1 $2,111,400 $7,231,000 - $9,342,400 Property Tax In Lieu of Motor Vehicle License Fee Revenue Table B-1 $814,800 $994,700 - $1,809,500 Sales Tax [1] Table B-5 $451,200 $136,500 $1,509,000 $2,096,700 Prop. 172 Public Safety Sales Tax Table B-5 $14,800 $105,900 - $120,700 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Table B-8 $625,500 - - $625,500 Total Annual Tax Revenues Generated by the Project $4,017,700 $8,468,100 $1,509,000 $13,994,800 Source: NorthPoint Development, LLC; EPS.[1] Includes sales tax revenues generated through the Bradley-Burns local 1% Uniform Local Sales Tax rate, the City's Measure U 1% rate approved by voters in 2018, and the statewide sales tax rate.

Sacramento City CouncilDecember 2, 2025

Sacramento City Council
December 2, 2025