January 2018
62 PART D –
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
63 CITY OF SALINAS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
COVENTRY STREET AND VICTOR STREET TRAFFIC CALMING
DEVICES
SECTION 1 SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS
All work to be done under this Contract shall conform to the applicable requirements of the STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, DESIGN STANDARDS, AND STANDARD PLANS, Latest Edition and subsequent revisions, City of Salinas, Public Works Department, herein referred to as the “Standard Specifications”.
The most current approved version of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), and the State Standard Plans and Specifications, 2024 Edition.
The listing of certain salient sections from the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions shall not in any way relieve the Contractor of complying with each and every section of the Standard Specifications.
In the event of conflicts or discrepancies among the Contract Documents, interpretations will be based on the following priorities:
1. Addenda, if any, with later date having precedence over those of earlier date.
2. These Special Provisions.
3. Standard Specifications.
4. State Standard Specifications.
In the case of an inconsistency between Plans and Specifications or within either Document not clarified by addendum, the more elaborate, greater quantity and better quality of work shall be provided unless Owner elects to proceed with a change order for the work at a reduction or increase, as applicable, in the Contract Price.
Wherever in the Special Provisions, Notice to Bidders, Proposal, Contract, or other Contract documents the following terms are used; the intent and meaning shall be interpreted as follows:
State – California Department of Transportation
Department - City of Salinas
City - City of Salinas
Local Public Agency - City of Salinas
Owner - City of Salinas
Engineer – City Engineer
64 SECTION 2 BIDDING
2-1.01 GENERAL
The Bidder's attention is directed to the Provisions in Section 2, "Proposal Requirements and Conditions", of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions for the requirements and conditions which he/she must observe in the preparations of the Proposal form and the submission of the Bid. The City reserves the right to award or withhold award of the project.
Each proposal shall have listed therein the name and address of each subcontractor to whom the bidder proposes to subcontract portions of the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent of the total bid or $10,000, whichever is greater, in accordance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act, commencing with Section 4100 of the Public Contract Code. The bidder’s attention is invited to other provisions by using unauthorized subcontractors or by making unauthorized substitutions.
In addition, each Proposal shall have listed therein the portion of work that shall be done by each Subcontractor listed. A sheet for listing the Subcontractor is included in the Proposal.
The Contractor, sub recipient, or Subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of a person’s political or religious affiliation or belief, non-affiliation or non-belief, race, color, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability, marital, military status (past or present), and national origin in the performance of this Contract. 2-1.02 APPROXIMATE ESTIMATE
The quantities given in the proposal and contract are approximate only, being given as a basis for the comparison of bids. The City does not, expressly or by implication, agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, and reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work, or to omit portions of the work, as may be deemed necessary or advisable by the Engineer. 2-1.03 EXAMINATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACT AND SITE OF WORK
The Bidder shall examine carefully the site of work contemplated, the Plans and Specifications, and the Proposal and Contract Forms, therefore. The submission of a Bid shall be conclusive evidence that the Bidder has investigated and is satisfied as to the conditions to be encountered, as to the character, quality, and scope of work to be performed, the quantities of materials to be furnished, and as to the requirements of the Proposal, Plans, Specifications, and the Contract.
All questions about the meaning or intent of the Contract Documents shall be submitted to the City of Salinas through the project page on the PlanetBids website. Responses will be issued by Addenda electronically online through the PlanetBids Vendor Portal website and ONLY to Bidders who are registered Prospective Bidders for this project. Questions received less than 9 calendar days prior to the date of the opening of bids will not be answered. Only questions answered by Addenda will be binding.
Oral and other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect.
Bidder is cautioned to make such independent investigation and examination as he/she deems necessary to satisfy himself/herself as to conditions to be encountered in the performance of the work and with respect to possible local material sources, the quality, and quantity of material available from such property, and 65 the type and extent of processing that may be required in order to produce material conforming to the requirements of these Special Provisions.
The availability or use of information described within the Provisions in Section 2-1.06 is not to be construed in any way as a waiver of the Provisions of the first paragraph of the State Standard Specification in Section 2-1.07 of these Special Provisions, and the Bidder is cautioned to make such independent investigation and examination as he/she deems necessary to satisfy himself/herself as to conditions to be encountered in the performance of the work and with respect to possible local material sources, the quality, and quantity of material available from such property and the type and extent of processing that may be required in order to produce material conforming to the requirements of these Special Provisions.
No information derived from inspection of records of investigation or compilation thereof made by the City of Salinas or from the City Engineer, or their assistants, shall in any way relieve the Bidder or Contractor from any risk or from properly fulfilling the terms of the Contract. 2-1.04 DIR REGISTRATION
A Contractor or Subcontractor shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5. It is not a violation of this section for an unregistered contractor to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded.
All Contractors (prime and subs) must possess and maintain such registration with DIR in order to be awarded and to perform work on public works project. The following is the link to DIR’s Contractor Registration searchable database: https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/Search.action. 2-1.05 SUBCONTRACTING
The percentage of work a prime contractor is required to self-perform is thirty percent (30%) of the total bid. Contractor shall adhere to Chapter 4 of the Public Contract Code, “Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act”. Prime contractor shall submit a “Subcontractor Submittal Form” for subcontractors prior to commencement of work. All subcontractors, no matter the tier, or amount of work they will perform, shall be listed on this form. All subcontractors shall be approved prior to their work commencing.
Each subcontractor shall have an active and valid:
State Contractor License with a classification appropriate for the work to be performed. Public Works Contractor registration number with the Department of Industrial Relations. City of Salinas Business License.
2-1.06 EXAMINATION OF SITE
Before submitting a Bid, each Bidder shall carefully examine the Plans and Specifications relating hereto.
He/she shall also visit the site if the proposed work and shall fully inform himself/herself as to all the existing conditions relating to the construction and related labor so that he/she may fully understand the 66 facilities, difficulties, restrictions attendant on the execution of the work, limitations applying to the work, and he/she shall estimate and include in his/her Bid a sum sufficient to cover the cost of all items which are required to attain the completed conditions contemplated in the project. 2-1.07 BID PROTEST AND BID PROTEST FEE
Bid protests are limited to “Bidders” as defined in the Contract Documents. Any Bid protest must be submitted in writing to the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. (as determined by the clock in the City Clerk’s Office) within 3 working days after Bid opening.
a) Any protest of the proposed award of Bid to the Bidder deemed the lowest responsible Bidder must be submitted in writing to the City no later than 5:00 p.m. within 3 working days following the date of the Bid opening. If a Bidder protests more than one Bid, the Bidder shall file a separate protest as to each Bid being protested, complying with this section. b) The initial protest document must contain a complete statement of the basis for the protest. The protest must refer to the specific portion of the document or the specific statute that forms the basis for the protest. The protest must include the name, address, and telephone number of the person representing the protesting party. The protest must be signed and submitted under penalty of perjury.
c) The party filing the protest must concurrently transmit a copy of the initial protest document and any attached documentation to the Bidder whose Bid is being protested, as well as to all other parties with a direct financial interest that may be adversely affected by the outcome of the protest.
Such parties shall include all other Bidders who appear to have a reasonable prospect of receiving an award depending upon the outcome of the protest. Faxed or emailed copies are acceptable, with confirmation of receipt by the Bidder or person to whom it was sent. d) The protestor must have actually submitted a Bid on the project or have been specifically excluded from submitting a Bid due to an action by the City. A Subcontractor of a party submitting a Bid on this project may not submit a Bid protest. A party may not rely on the Bid protest submitted by another Bidder, but must timely pursue its own protest. e) The City Council shall hear the Bid protest prior to adopting a resolution authorizing the Bid award and execution of the contract. In cases where the contract is not executed by the City pursuant to City Council Resolution, the Bid protest shall be heard by the City Council prior to the time the City issues a Notice to Proceed, or the appropriate City official executes the contract on behalf of the City. The decision of the Council shall be final.
f) The protestor shall also submit a non-refundable fee of $1,000.00 per protest via certified check made payable to the City of Salinas to reimburse its costs in reviewing and investigating the Bid protest. Any protest submitted without the fee shall be returned without further action by the City. g) Any protest not complying with this section shall be returned without further action by the City. h) The procedure and time limits set forth in this paragraph are mandatory, are Bidder’s sole, and exclusive remedy in the event of Bid protest. Bidder’s failure to comply with these procedures 67 shall constitute a waiver of any right to further pursue the Bid protest, including filing a Government Code Claim or any legal proceedings.
SECTION 3 CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION
The Contractor’s attention is directed to the Provisions in Section 3, “Award and Execution of Contract”, of the Standard Specifications and Section 2 “Bidding”, of these Special Provisions for the requirements and conditions concerning award and execution of the Contract.
Certificates of Insurance shall be furnished by the Contractor and shall be returned with the signed Contract and Contract bonds within 15 calendar days after receipt. The Notice to Proceed with the work shall not be issued by the City Engineer until all such documents are submitted.
The Contractor shall have 15 calendar days immediately following award of Contract (not Notice to Proceed) to furnish materials submittals.
In determining the lowest “responsible” Bidder, consideration shall be given to the general competency of Contractor in regard to the work covered by the Proposal. To this end, each Proposal shall be supported by the “Bidder’s Statement of Financial Responsibility, Technical Ability, and Experience” on the form(s) found herein. Failure of the Bidder to provide requested information in a complete and accurate manner shall be considered non-responsive resulting in rejection of the Bid. Additionally, the City of Salinas reserves the right to disqualify or refuse to consider a Proposal if a Bidder is in default for any of the following reasons:
a) Lack of competency and adequate machinery, plant, and other equipment, as revealed by the documents requested.
b) Uncompleted work, which in the judgment of the City Engineer, might hinder or prevent the prompt completion of additional work if awarded.
c) Failure to comply with any regulation of the City of Salinas d) Default under previous Contracts.
If awarded, this Contract shall be awarded to the responsible Bidder submitting the lowest Bid who meets the financial and technical requirements. The City of Salinas reserves the right to withhold award of Bid for 90 calendar days from the Bid opening date.
The Contract shall be executed by the successful Bidder and shall be returned, together with the Contract bonds, to the Agency so that it is received within 10 working days, not including Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, after the Bidder has received the Contract for execution. Failure to do so shall be just cause for forfeiture of the proposal guaranty. The executed Contract documents shall be delivered to the following address: City of Salinas, Attn: City Clerk, 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas CA 93901. 68 SECTION 4 SCOPE OF WORK
The work in general, shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals required for the construction in accordance with the Plans and these Special Provisions for the work herein, for the COVENTRY STREET AND VICTOR STREET TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES.
The work, in general, shall include the construction of one (1) traffic circle, one (1) raised crosswalk, furnishing and installation of detectable warning surfaces, curb drains, drainage channels, street signs on new poles/posts, removal of existing pavement markings, removal of existing asphalt concrete pavement, removal of existing concrete ramps, sidewalk, curb and gutter, installation of new concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, installation of new pavement striping and markings, and all incidental and appurtenant improvements and restorations specified in accordance with the Plans and these Special Provisions.
Such other items or details not mentioned above, but that are required by the Plans and Specifications, Standard Specifications, or these Special Provisions shall be performed, placed, constructed, and/or installed for a complete project. Payment shall be included in the various items of work and no additional compensation shall be made.
Except for authorized changes in the work, payment for said complete-in-place finished work or improvement will be made only on the basis of the Contract item of work listed in the Proposal. All other work, including the furnishing of labor, materials, tools, equipment and incidentals, provided for in these Plans and Specifications and Contract, or required for the proper completion of the work as a whole, for which no separate payment has been provided shall be an obligation of the Contractor and payment therefore shall be considered included in the price paid for the various items of work listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be made.
4-1.01 BID ITEM DESCRIPTION
This section covers details of individual items of the Base Bid to ensure that it is clear as to what is to be included in each item. The costs submitted with each item are to reflect the work to be completed under the bid item only. Payment of all of the following items shall be for actual materials installed on the job and for the actual work accomplished.
ITEM 1 – MOBILIZATION
Mobilization shall consist of preparatory work and operations, including, but not limited to, those necessary for the movement of personnel, equipment, supplies, and incidentals to the project site; for the establishment of all offices, buildings, and other facilities necessary for work on the project; and for all other work and operations which must be performed, or costs incurred prior to beginning work on the various contract items on the project site. Payment for mobilization shall include all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and other appurtenances required for a complete-in-place mobilization as indicated within these Special Provisions and as shown on the Plans. Payment shall be included in the Contract unit price paid per Lump Sum (LS) for “MOBILIZATION” as listed in the Proposal no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
ITEM 2 – TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
69 Payment for all temporary traffic control shall include full compensation for furnishing labor, materials, tools, equipment; notifying all affected property owners, residents, businesses, City of Salinas Police and Fire Departments, City of Salinas, Republic Services (garbage company), MST (Monterey-Salinas Transit), effected school districts, and agencies; implementation, installation and removal of all temporary traffic control, including all required temporary construction signs and posts, city furnished financing signs, lights, barricades, delineators, removal at end of project, necessary mounting hardware, and other appurtenances required for a complete-in-place temporary traffic control as indicated within these Special Provisions and as shown on the Plans. Payment shall be included in the Contract unit price paid per Lump Sum (LS) for “TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL” as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
ITEM 3 – FURNISH AND INSTALL TRAFFIC CIRCLE, COMPLETE-IN-PLACE Payment for the construction of a traffic circle shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, and equipment for the removal and disposal of existing asphalt concrete, removal of existing pavement striping and markings, construction surveying and staking, adjustment of sanitary sewer manhole, placement and compaction of aggregate base, dowel reinforcements, concrete form work, pouring and finishing of concrete, placement of backfill with top soil, installation of new signs and posts, installation of new pavement striping and markings, and other appurtenances required for a complete-in-place installation of a traffic circle. Payment shall be included in the Contract unit price paid per Lump Sum (LS) for “FURNISH AND INSTALL TRAFFIC CIRCLE” as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
ITEM 4 – FURNISH AND INSTALL RAISED CROSSWALK, COMPLETE-IN-PLACE Payment for the construction of raised crosswalk shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, and equipment for the removal and disposal of existing asphalt concrete, removal and disposal of existing concrete pedestrian ramps, removal and disposal of concrete sidewalk and concrete curb and gutter, grading, construction surveying and staking, concrete form work, placement and compaction of aggregate base, dowel reinforcements, pouring and finishing of concrete sidewalk and concrete curb and gutter, placement of Type “A” HMA, installation of detectable warning surfaces, relocation of existing signs, removal and disposal of existing poles, installation of new signs and posts, installation of new pavement striping and markings, installation of curb drains and drainage channels, installation of cobble splash pad, and other appurtenances required for a complete-in-place installation of a raised crosswalk. Payment shall be included in the Contract unit price paid per Lump Sum (LS) for “FURNISH AND INSTALL RAISED CROSSWALK” as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore. 4-1.02 COMPLETE-IN-PLACE
Complete-in-place means that payment shall be full compensation for all work necessary to complete the portion of the Contract in its entirety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, in accordance with the requirements of the Contract. When the basis of payment states the work shall be paid for complete-inplace it shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to determine the elements necessary to complete the work.
When the basis of payment includes a list of elements associated with the complete-in-place work, the list shall not be construed to limit the work to the listed elements. 70 4-1.03 CHANGES IN WORK
Changes and extra work shall be in accordance with Section 4-1.05, “Changes and Extra Work”, of the State Standard Specifications.
The Engineer reserves the right to make such alterations, deviations, additions to or omissions from the Specifications, including the right to increase or decrease the quantity of any item or portion of the work or omit any items or portion of the work, as may be deemed by the Engineer to be necessary or advisable, and to require such extra work as may be determined by the Engineer to be necessary for the proper completion or construction of the whole work contemplated.
Contractor to submit list of required equipment and minimum personnel required to complete the work, prior to authorization of any “Time and Material/Force Account” work.
For work done on a “Time and Materials” or “Force Account” basis, Contractor shall submit all required documents for a specific change within ten (10) calendar days of completing the work.
Outstanding proposals at the end of the project: The Contractor shall submit all outstanding proposals, in the specified format, within ten (10) calendar days of the date established as “Substantial Completion”. The City reserves the right to not process any proposals received after that date unless specifically agreed in advance.
4-1.04 CHANGED CONDITIONS
a. Differing Site Conditions
1. During the progress of the work, if subsurface or latent physical conditions are encountered at the site differing materially from those indicated in the contract or if unknown physical conditions of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in the work provided for in the contract are encountered at the site, the party discovering such conditions shall promptly notify the other party in writing of the specific differing conditions before the site is disturbed and before the affected work is performed.
2. Upon written notification, the engineer will investigate the conditions, and if it is determined that the conditions materially differ and cause an increase or decrease in the cost or time required for the performance of any work under the contract, and adjustment, excluding anticipated profits, will be made and the contract modified in writing accordingly. The engineer will notify the contractor of the determination whether or not an adjustment of the contract is warranted.
3. No contract adjustment which results in a benefit to the contractor will be allowed unless the contractor has provided the required written notice.
4. No contract adjustment will be allowed under this clause for any effects caused on unchanged work. (This provision may be omitted by the Local Agency, at their option.) b. Suspensions of Work Ordered by the Engineer
71 Suspensions of work shall be in accordance with Section 8-1.06 “Suspensions” of the State Standard Specifications.
c. Significant Changes in the Character of Work
1. The Engineer reserves the right to make, in writing, at any time during the work, such changes in quantities and such alterations in the work as necessary to satisfactorily complete the project.
Such changes in quantities and alterations shall not invalidate the contract nor release the surety, and the contractor agrees to perform the work as altered.
2. If the alterations or changes in quantities significantly change the character of the work under the contract, whether such alterations or changes in are in themselves significant changes to the character of the work or by affecting other work cause such other work to become significantly different in character, an adjustment, excluding anticipated profit, will be made to the contract.
The basis for the adjustment shall be agreed upon prior to the performance of the work. If a basis cannot be agreed upon, then an adjustment will be made either for or against the contractor in such amount as the engineer may determine to be fair or equitable.
3. If the alterations or changes in quantities do not significantly change the character of the work to be performed under the contract, the altered work will be paid for as provided elsewhere in the contract.
4. The term “significant change” shall be construed to apply only to the following circumstances:
When the character of work as altered differs materially in kind or nature from that involved or included in the original proposed construction; or When a major item of work, as defined elsewhere in the contract, is increased in excess of 125 percent or decreased below 75 percent of the original contract quantity. Any allowance for an increase in quantity shall apply only to that portion in excess of 125 percent of original contract item quantity, or in case of decrease below 75 percent, to the actual amount of work performed.
4-1.05 ITEMS NOT LISTED
Items of labor and materials which are not specifically listed in the Proposal and these Special Provisions as pay items, but which are shown and/or mentioned on the Plans or are required to be done to complete the overall project, shall be considered included in other pay items, and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.
SECTION 5 CONTROL OF WORK
5-1.01 PERMITS AND LICENSES
The Contractor and approved Subcontractor(s) shall obtain all necessary licenses (a valid City of Salinas business license), a valid, current, and in good standing Class A (General Engineering) contractor’s license issued by the California Contractor’s State License Board (CSLB) depending on the type of work the contractor is approved for, and a City of Salinas Transportation permit if 72 necessary (including State Permit, if applicable), and any other permits required for the project prior to the commencement of construction.
All City encroachment permit fees for work performed under this agreement will be waived by the City of Salinas.
Should the permit require specialty testing, payment for necessary materials, and specialty testing including testing results and reports are outside the scope of this Contract and shall be provided by the City of Salinas.
The costs for any re-testing as a result of failed tests shall be borne by the Contractor and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore. All testing labs and certified testers shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to retesting.
The City of Salinas will provide the appropriate material testing for this project.
The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of the Division of Industrial Safety and the Department of Industrial Relations.
5-1.02 NOTICE OF POTENTIAL CLAIM
Section 5-1.43 “Potential Claims and Dispute Resolution”, of the State Standard Specifications is amended to read:
Section 5-1.43 Potential Claims and Dispute Resolution – The Contractor shall not be entitled to the payment of any additional compensation for any act, or failure to act, by the City Engineer, including failure or refusal to issue a change order, or for the happening of any event, thing, occurrence, or other cause, unless he/she shall have given the City Engineer due written notice of potential claim as hereinafter specified. Compliance with this section shall not be a prerequisite as to matters within the scope of the protest Provisions in Section 4-1.05, “Changes and Extra Work”, or the notice Provisions 4.106, “Differing Site Conditions”, or Section 8-1.10, “Liquidated Damages”, nor to any claim which is based on difference in measurements or errors of computation as to Contract quantities.
The written notice of potential claim shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the time that the Contractor performs the work given rise to the potential claim for additional compensation, if based on an act or failure to act by the City Engineer, or in all other cases within 15 calendar days after the happening of the event, things, occurrence, or other cause, giving rise to the potential claim.
It is the intention of this section that differences between the parties arising under and by virtue of the Contract are brought to the attention of the City Engineer at the earliest possible time in order that such matters may be settled, if possible, or other appropriate action promptly taken. The Contractor hereby agrees that he/she shall have no right to additional compensation for any claim that may be based on such act, failure to act, event, thing or occurrence for which no written notice of potential claim as herein required was filed.
Should the Contractor, in connection with or subsequent to the assertion of a potential claim, request inspection and copying of documents or records in the possession of the City that pertain 73 to the potential claim, contractor shall make its records of the project, as deemed by the City to be pertinent to the potential claim, available to the City for inspection and copying.
Submission of a claim, properly certified, with all required supporting documentation, and written rejection or denial of all or part of the claim by owner, is a condition precedent to any action, proceeding, litigation, suit, or demand for arbitration by Contractor. 5-1.03 CLAIMS
Submission of a claim, properly certified with all required supporting documentation, and written rejection or denial of all or part of the claim by the City Engineer, is a condition precedent to any action, proceeding, litigation, suitor demand for arbitration by Contractor. The Contractor's attention is directed to Section 9-
1.07B “Final Payment and Claims” of the Standard Specifications.
Payment for graffiti, if required, shall be borne by the Contractor, and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore.
5-1.04 DISCREPANCIES
Should the Contractor at any time discover any discrepancy or mistake in a drawing or Specification, any variation between dimension on drawings and measurements at site, or any lack of dimensions or other information he/she shall report at once to the Engineer for correction and shall not proceed with work affected thereby until such correction has been made.
5-1.05 COORDINATION AND COOPERATION
The Contractor shall schedule operations to cooperate and work harmoniously with City forces, Utility Companies, affected property owners and tenants, other Contractors, and the City of Salinas during the execution of this Contract; coordinating all activities to prevent unnecessary conflicts, delays, and disruptions to the progress of the project. Scheduling of construction activities should be in conformance with Caltrans Construction Site BMP SS-1 (“Scheduling”), with every effort made to perform the Grading and Clearing and Grubbing operations during dry season (May 1 – Sept 30).
The construction progress schedule under Section 8-1.04 of the Standard Specifications is required of this Contract and such schedule shall show the coordination between the Contractor and utility companies to minimize delays to the overall progress of the work.
5-1.06 WORK TO BE DONE BY OTHERS
Miscellaneous items of work not included under the various Proposal items and as shown on the Plans, "N.I.C." and/or "By Others", will be done by others and is not a part of this Contract.
No additional compensation will be afforded for scheduling or rescheduling of work to allow for the work by others. However, time extension will be granted if Contractor's overall progress is impeded by the work of others.
Work to be done by others shall include but is not limited to relocations and adjustments of utility company facilities shall be performed by various utility companies, if necessary and as required. 74 5-1.07 UTILITY DETERMINATION
The Contractor shall coordinate with the utility companies to locate and mark all utility mains and service laterals, including depth within the project area. Contractor shall make full determination of all underground utilities in order to prevent damage or disruption to the existing services during construction.
The Contractor shall contact the Underground Service Alert (“U.S.A.”), telephone number 811, 48 hours in advance before performing any trenching or excavation work.
Contractor shall adhere to all U.S.A.-North rules and regulations. Contractor shall be responsible for protecting all utility facilities (MH lids, water valves, gas valves, etc.).
The Contractor is hereby notified that some utility conflicts, if any, may exist at the start of construction.
The Contractor shall be prepared to schedule his/her work around these conflicts. While the Contractor shall be granted time extensions without penalty for utility delays if such delays impede his/her overall progress, no extra payment will be made for utility delays, except as provided in these Special Provisions and the Provisions in Section 8-1.07, “Delays”, of the State Standard Specifications. Such time extensions will furnish evidence that his/her overall progress is being delayed. Minor reassignment of work forces or equipment, which may be in conflict with utility's work, shall not be construed as delay in the Contractor's progress.
Utility company's work, if any, shall be done concurrently with this project and shall include work within the street right-of-way. The Contractor shall schedule and coordinate his/her installations with the utility companies to avoid any conflicts which may impede the overall progress of the project. All removals, installations, and relocations of conflicting underground and above ground utilities shall be executed by the respective utility companies at their expense.
The utilities shown on the Plans are for reference only and are based on utility company records. Known conflicts have been investigated and approximate cover indicated on Plans, if any. The Contractor shall prosecute the work exercising reasonable care not to damage any such facilities. If the Contractor, while performing the work, discovers facilities not identified on the Plans, he/she shall immediately notify the utility company and the City Engineer in writing within 72 hours.
The Contractor's attention is directed to the existence of certain underground facilities that may require special precautions to be taken by the Contractor to protect the health, safety and welfare of workers and of the public. Facilities requiring special precautions include, but are not limited to: natural gas pipelines, underground telephone, cable TV and electric supply system conductors or cables either directly buried or in duct or conduit. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer at least 24 hours prior to performing any work in the vicinity of such facilities.
Repair of pipes due to accidental or convenience removals (including equipment conflicts) shall be at the expense of the Contractor and no additional compensation will be allowed. 5-1.08 COORDINATION AND COOPERATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES AND
OTHER CONTRACTORS
The Contractor shall be required to cooperate and work harmoniously with the public utility companies, other Contractors, affected property owners/tenants and the City of Salinas during the execution of this Contract.
75 Prior to any work, the Contractor shall submit a schedule for his/her work reflecting coordination with other Contractors, if any, and utility companies. All work shall be coordinated to minimize delays to the overall progress of work.
5-1.09 CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS
Any work to be done on private properties or requiring access through private properties shall not be done until the City has acquired easements or right-of-entry from the property owner. Prior to starting such work, the Contractor shall verify with the City Engineer that such authority has been granted.
The Contractor will confine their operations within the limitations of construction easements or limits as shown on the drawings. If the Contractor's operations result in damage to plantings or any other privatelyowned facility outside the limitations of the construction easements or public right-of-way, the Contractor shall, at their expense, repair such damage or indemnify the owner of the damaged property.
If the Contractor negotiates with property owners for use of land for construction operations outside the limits of the construction easements, he/she shall do so at their own risk and the City will assume no liability for such use of private property. All agreements between the Contractor and private property owners shall be in writing. The Contractor shall commence no work outside the construction easements until copies of such agreements are furnished to the City.
5-1.10 SOUND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall comply with all local sound control and noise level rules, regulations, and ordinances which apply to any work performed pursuant to the Contract.
Each internal combustion engine, used for any purpose on the job or related to the job, shall be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer. No internal combustion engine shall be operated on the project without said muffler.
Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various Contract items of work involved and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.
5-1.11 GRAFFITI
The Contractor shall remove all graffiti from any equipment and/or structures (any type), new or existing within the limits of project within 24 hours daily throughout the contract. The Contractor shall not bring any equipment to the project site with graffiti on it.
Payment for graffiti remediation, if required, shall be borne by the Contractor, and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
5-1.12 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMPLIANCE
The Contractor’s attention is directed to the provisions in Section 14-9.02, “Air Pollution Control” and Section 13, “Water Pollution Control”, of the State Standard Specifications. No mud, asphalt, concrete, or cement slurry resulting from saw cutting is allowed to drain into the City’s catch basins. 76 A. The Contractor shall abate dust nuisance by cleaning, sweeping, and sprinkling with water during all phases of construction including weekends, holidays, and any other times as directed by the City Engineer. The use of water or other materials that results in mud on the public streets shall not be permitted as a substitute for sweeping. The Contractor shall submit a contact phone number. The Contractor shall respond to dust control abatement requests within four (4) hours of receiving notification. Should the Contractor fail to respond to such notice, the City shall cause to have the abatement completed by any available construction team and deduct that cost from any funds due to the Contractor. Payment for dust control abatement and sweeping shall be considered as included in the contract price paid for by the various items of work involved and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
B. Construction site erosion and sediment control BMP’s must be in place prior to commencement of construction. The requirements of the State’s CGP are intended to be implemented on a year round basis, not just during rainy season (Oct 1 – Apr 30). Acceptable pollution control protection around existing area drains shall be in conformance with Caltrans Storm Drainage Inlet Protection BMP (“SC-10”).
C. Protection of storm drain inlets and/or adjacent waterways shall be in place at all times during construction. Tracking of mud, sediment, concrete washout, trash or other construction-related materials or wastes are not allowed to be discharged in the public right of way, on private streets, or into the City’s storm drain system. Any such discharges shall be cleaned up at the end of the current work shift in which the discharge occurred, or at the end of the current workday, whichever comes first.
5-1.13 CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING TRAFFIC For Traffic Maintenance, the Contractor’s attention is directed to Section 7-1.03, “Public Convenience” and 12-4.02C(9), “Flagging”, of the State Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. Nothing in these Special Provisions shall be construed as relieving the Contractor from their responsibility as provided in said Section 12-4.02C(9). Contractor shall provide delineators for traffic safety:
A. Whenever immediate action is required to prevent impending injury, death, or property damage, and precautions which are the Contractor's responsibility have not been taken and are not expected to be taken, the City may, after reasonable attempts to notify the Contractor, cause such precautions to be taken and shall charge the cost thereof against the Contractor, or may deduct such cost from any amount due or becoming due from the City. City action or inaction under such circumstances shall not be construed as relieving the Contractor of their surety from liability.
B. The Contractor shall notify the Police, Fire, Traffic, Monterey-Salinas Transit, Engineering Department of jurisdictional agencies involved, affected property owners and businesses, and news media (radio, TV, newspaper) at least 10 calendar days in advance of any work that will delay traffic. The Contractor shall cooperate with local authorities relative to handling traffic through the area and shall make their own arrangements relative to keeping the working area clear of parked vehicles.
The Contractor shall also be responsible for compliance with additional public safety requirements which may arise during construction. They shall exercise special caution against dangerous 77 conditions, and shall provide, install, and maintain temporary barricades and fencing as may be necessary to protect the public. All construction traffic control devices shall be in place and operational prior to beginning work or different phases throughout the contract. During construction and within the area of work barricades, signs, lights, flashers, and other safety devices shall be used by the Contractor to direct vehicular and pedestrian traffic. During any day between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., the Contractor may limit traffic to one lane in each direction with approved traffic control measures, unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer.
During construction and within the area of work barricades, signs, lights, flashers and other safety devices shall be used by the Contractor to direct vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The Contractor shall maintain pedestrian and two-way vehicular traffic at all times. Full closure of any streets will not be allowed unless approved by the City Engineer. Traffic safety devices shall be in good repair at all times. Traffic safety devices in need of repair or paint shall be removed immediately from the project on order of the Project Inspector. Upon completion of work, the Contractor shall promptly remove all signs and warning devices.
C. Personal vehicles of the Contractor’s employees shall not be parked on the traveled way or shoulders, including any section closed to public traffic.
Whenever vehicles or equipment are parked within six feet of a traffic lane, the shoulder area shall be closed with florescent traffic cones or portable delineators placed on a taper in advance of the parked vehicles or equipment and along the roadway at 25-foot intervals to a point not less than 25 feet past the last vehicles or piece of equipment. A minimum of 9 cones or portable delineators shall be used for the taper. A W20-1 (Road Work Ahead) or C24 (Shoulder Work Ahead) sign shall be mounted on a telescoping flag tree with flags. The flag tree shall be place whereas directed by the City Engineer.
D. Where work is to be performed on private properties (removal and construction of walks, driveway, etc.), the City Engineer will obtain written permission for right-of-entry from the respective owner prior to performing the work. No work shall be commenced by the Contractor until such permission has been granted and until notified by the City Engineer. The Contractor shall be responsible for any and all property damage and public liability resulting from their operation on said private properties.
E. Unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer, the Contractor shall at all times maintain vehicular and pedestrian access to all properties fronting City streets. Two-way traffic shall be maintained at all times. The Resident City Engineer shall determine if temporary driveways will be necessary within the limits of work during construction. Traffic shall be maintained on one-half of the street at all times.
F. Contractor shall provide delineators for traffic safety until such time as all cat tracking has been performed. Cat tracking shall be completed within 8 hours of completed paving/resurfacing at the respective location and shall be maintained in a legible and traffic safety manner by the Contractor until final striping or pavement markings are in place.
Payment - The cost of furnishing all flagmen and police officers, maintaining traffic as described herein and under the State Standard Specifications in Section 7-1.03, "Public Convenience"," 7-1.04, "Public 78 Safety," and Section 12-4.02C(9), "Flagging", and for complying with the Provisions of these Special Provisions shall be included in the various items of work listed in the Proposal, and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
5-1.14 DEWATERING
Reserved.
5-1.15 INSPECTIONS AND CONTROL OF WORK
In all cases where inspection of the work is required and/or where portions of the work are specified to be performed under the direction and/or inspection of the City Engineer, the Contractor shall notify the City Engineer at least 48 hours in advance of the time such inspection and/or direction is required.
The Contractor’s attention is directed to Section 6-2 of the Standard Specifications. In addition to the requirements of said section, the Contractor’s representative shall notify the Engineer daily of the following day’s proposed work schedule in order to plan for appropriate inspections. The Contractor’s Representative shall also submit a daily report of the day’s construction activity for review and approval. The daily report shall contain the name, classification, and detailed task listing, of all personnel and equipment, including all Subcontractors, at work that day.
All work and materials shall be subject to inspection at all times by representatives of the City Engineer.
Before starting work, the Prime Contractor shall assign a representative to:
1. Receive the City Inspector/Engineer's orders
2. Implement the City Inspector/Engineer's orders
3. Supervise the workers
4. Coordinate the Subcontractors' work
Payment for submitting the Contractor’s daily report and notification of the next day work schedule under this section shall be considered included in the various contract prices, and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
5-1.16 CLOSING OF UNINSPECTED WORK
Contractor shall not allow nor cause any of his work to be covered or enclosed until it has been inspected and approved by the City Engineer. Should any of his work be enclosed or covered before such inspection and approval he shall uncover the work at his own expense, and after inspection, make all repairs necessary to restore his work to its original condition.
5-1.17 AREAS FOR CONTRACTOR’S USE
The street right-of-way shall be used only for purposes that are necessary to perform the required work.
The Contractor shall not occupy the right-of-way or allow others to occupy the right-of-way, for purposes, which are not necessary to perform the required work, unless authorized in writing by the City Engineer. 5-1.18 OPEN AND/OR TRENCH EXCAVATIONS DEEPER THAN FOUR FEET
BELOW THE SURFACE
The Contractor shall promptly and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify the City Engineer in writing of any:
79 (1) Material that the Contractor believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, which is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II or Class III disposal site in accordance with the existing law.
(2) Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated. (3) Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract.
Should the conditions materially differ or do involve hazardous waste, any additional work will be at Section 4-1.05 “Changes and Extra Work” of the State Standard Specifications.
Your attention is directed to Section 9.1.22 “Arbitration”, of the State Standard Specifications. In the event of a dispute as to whether the conditions materially differ or do involve hazardous waste, the Contractor shall continue to proceed with all work to be performed under the Contract and shall retain all rights provided either by Contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of any dispute or protest. 5-1.19 PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY
The Contractors attention is directed to the Provisions in Section 5-1.36, “Property and Facility Preservation”, of the State Standard Specifications, and these Special Provisions.
Existing trees, shrubs, and other plants, that are not to be removed and are injured or damaged by reason of the Contractor’s operations, shall be replaced by the Contractor in accordance with the requirements within the Provisions in Section 5-1.39C “Landscape Damage” of the State Standard Specifications.
Damaged or injured plants shall be removed and disposed of outside the City of Salinas right-of-way in accordance with the Provisions in Section 14-10 of the State Standard Specifications. At the option of the Contractor, removed trees and shrubs may be reduced to chips. The chipped material shall be spread within the highway right-of-way at locations designated by the City Engineer.
Replacement planting of injured or damaged trees, shrubs, and other plants shall be completed not less than 5 working days prior to completion of project, and acceptance of the Contract. Contractor shall provide a 120-day landscape maintenance period for all replacement trees, shrubs, and other plants. 5-1.20 FINAL INSPECTION AND CLEANUP
At the completion of the work, a final inspection will be made by the City Engineer. The Contractor will be responsible for final cleanup of the project area in accordance of the Provisions with Section 4-1.13 of the State Standard Specifications.
SECTION 6 CONTROL OF MATERIALS
6-1.01 GENERAL
Attention is directed to the Provisions in Section 6, “Control of Materials”, of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions.
80 All materials required to complete the work under this Contract shall be furnished by the Contractor except when otherwise specified herein. Contractor shall provide a schedule of value for all lump sum items of work as listed in the Proposal. The schedule of values shall be used for any addition and/or deletion to that particular item of work.
6-1.02 RELATIVE COMPACTION/MATERIAL TESTING
Wherever relative compaction is specified to be determined by Test Method No. Calif. 216 or Test Method No. Calif. 231, the relative compaction shall be determined by Test Method No. 231, in accordance with the Provisions in Section 6-2 of the State Standard Specifications. All tests and frequency of tests shall be in accordance with the Standard Specifications and 2021 Quality Assurance Program. Contractor attention is directed to the Special Provisions in Section 5-1.20B, “Permits, Licenses, Agreements, and Certifications”, of the State Standard Specifications, concerning special testing. Payment for necessary materials and special testing including testing results and reports is outside the scope of this Contract and shall be provided by the City of Salinas.
6-1.03 SUBSTITUTIONS
Reference in these Specifications to any article, device, product, material, fixture, form or type of construction by name, make or catalog number is to be interpreted only as establishing a standard of quality, and not to be construed as limiting competition. In such cases, the Contractor may, at their option, use any article, device, product, material, fixture, form, or type of construction equal to that specified. The City Engineer is the final judge of acceptability of proposed substitute and the Contractor proposing substitution shall furnish, at their expense, any data, samples, test, etc., as required by the City Engineer to determine quality of the proposed substitutions.
In addition, all proposed substitutions shall be:
1. Submitted within 10 calendar days following award of the Contract as approved by City Council
2. Proven to the City Engineer to be equal or superior to the specified item in all respects
3. Accompanied by shop drawings and/or complete descriptive information.
All dimensional or functional changes, or changes to other work, which is required by, or are a result of, an acceptable substitution shall be the sole and complete responsibility of the Contractor and shall be made at no additional cost to the City of Salinas.
The Contractor shall make no substitutions of materials or equipment without written approval of the City Engineer.
SECTION 7 HEALTH AND SAFETY
7-1.01 CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY
The Contractor certifies that he is experienced and qualified to anticipate and meet the safety and health requirements of this Project. For informational purposes only the Contractor shall submit to the City a copy of his Injury and Illness Prevention Program. The Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. This requirement will 81 apply continuously 24 hours a day every day until final acceptance of the Work and shall not be limited to normal working hours. The duties of the City, Engineer and Inspector do not include review of the adequacy of the Contractor’s safety measures in, on, or about the site and vicinity.
A. Safety Officer: The Contractor shall designate a fully trained and responsible member of his organization at the site whose duty shall be prevention of hazards and accidents and who shall have the authority to direct work for the Contractor.
B. Safety Supervisor: The Contractor shall designate Safety Supervisors for each work site. One Safety Supervisor may be the Safety Officer. The other Safety Supervisors shall work for the Safety Officer. Each shall be fully trained for the type of work being performed and shall have authority to direct the Contractor’s work.
7-1.02 SAFETY MEASURES
The Contractor shall comply with all laws, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of any public authority having jurisdiction for the safety of persons or property or to protect them from damage, injury, or loss. The Contractor shall maintain copies of all documents mentioned or referenced in this Section readily available at the site until the work is completed. In the event the Contractor fails to observe any of the necessary safety provisions, the Owner may stop the work and direct the Contractor to comply with the applicable provisions or may order the necessary work to be done by others. All impacts, both monetary and time-related, associated with stoppage of the work in order to comply with the City's directives pertaining to safety requirements, and all costs of having the necessary work done by others shall be borne by the Contractor.
7-1.03 CONFINED SPACE SAFETY
Work performed in or about wastewater facilities, including but not limited to manholes, pipes, tanks, basins, and structures, carries with it the high potential for exposure of workers and other persons to hazardous conditions. The Contractor is required to be especially alert to these conditions. These conditions may include, but are not limited to, exposure to hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, methane, carbon monoxide and other gases; exposure to atmospheres containing insufficient oxygen to support the human life; exposure to wastewater (sewage) which may contain bacteriological, chemical, and other constituents harmful humans; working in conditions where engulfment or entrapment of personnel may occur (such as in trench excavation); and working in structures with uneven or slippery surfaces and with difficult and limited access. Many of these environments are classified as “confined spaces” in the Federal National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) regulations and/or the State of California’s General Industry Safety Orders. The Contractor shall be fully familiar with, and shall strictly adhere to and comply with, the applicable sections of these documents pertaining to confined spaces. In the event of a conflict between applicable requirements, the more restrictive shall apply. Solely as an aid to the Contractor, and without assuming any liability for their completeness or for determining if they are the regulations that are currently in effect, the Owner has included excerpts from the State of California General Industry Safety Orders which the City believe are applicable to the Works. These excerpts consist of State of California, Administrative Code, Title 8, General Industry Safety Orders, Articles 107 and 108 are found at the end of these Specifications (provided by the Owner).
82 7-1.04 PERSONAL HYGIENE
Persons involved in the work may be exposed to disease-producing organisms in wastewater. The Contractor shall require his/her personnel to observe proper hygienic precautions, including washing of hands and other exposed portions of the body with disinfecting soap and water before eating or smoking.
Contractor shall provide Port-a-Potty for all workers at his/her expense. 7-1.05 PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONVENIENCE
Attention is directed to Section 7-1.03 “Public Convenience” of the State Standard Specifications, and these Special Provisions. Safe and adequate pedestrian zones and crossing of work shall be maintained at all times. The Contractor shall conduct his/her work so as to insure the least possible obstruction to traffic, inconvenience to the general public in the vicinity of the work, and to insure the protection of persons and property. No road or street shall be closed to the public except with the permission of the City Engineer and the proper governmental authority. Fire hydrants on or adjacent to the work shall be accessible to firefighting equipment. Temporary Provisions shall be made by the Contractor to insure the use of sidewalks, private and public driveways, and proper functioning of gutters, sewer inlets, drainage ditches and culverts, irrigation ditches, and natural water courses.
7-1.06 WARNINGS AND BARRICADES
The Contractor shall provide and maintain barricades, guards, temporary bridges and walkways, watchmen, night lights and danger signals illuminated from sunset to sunrise, and all other necessary appliances and safeguards to protect the work, life, property, the public, excavations, equipment, and materials. Barricades shall be of substantial construction and shall be painted such as to increase their visibility at night. Suitable warning signs shall be placed and illuminated at night as to show in advance where construction, barricades, or detours exist. Guard rails shall be provided for bridges or walkways over or adjoining excavations, shafts and other openings, and locations where injury may occur. 7-1.07 FIRE PREVENTION
A. Fire Extinguishers and Hoses: The Contractor shall furnish and maintain fully charged fire extinguishers of the appropriate type, supplemented with temporary fire hoses wherever an adequate water supply exists, at the places where burning, welding, or other operations that may cause a fire are being performed.
B. Flammable, Hazardous, or Toxic Materials: Solvents, gasoline, and other hazardous materials may be in the wastewater (sewage); and therefore, the work site may be hazardous to open flame, sparks, or unventilated occupancy. The Contractor shall take measures to insure his personnel observe proper safety precautions when working in these areas. Only a working supply of flammable, hazardous, or toxic materials shall be permitted in or on any of the permanent structures and improvements, and shall be removed there from at the end of each day's operations. The Contractor shall store flammable, hazardous, or toxic materials and waste separate from the Work and stored materials for the Works in a manner that prevents spontaneous combustion or dispersion; none shall be placed in any sewer or drain piping nor buried on the City's or other property. The Contractor shall maintain a current and up-to-date copy of all laws, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of any regulatory authority having jurisdiction of control over flammable, hazardous or toxic materials, and at his/her expense shall comply with said laws, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations, and lawful orders.
83 7-1.08 SAFETY HELMETS, CLOTHING AND EQUIPMENT
The Contractor shall not permit any person for whom he/she is responsible or liable to enter or remain on the site of the Work unless the person is equipped with and wearing a safety helmet, other protective clothing, and safety equipment as required and shall discharge from the site all persons not so equipped.
The Contractor shall post conspicuous signs at the appropriate locations warning the public and persons engaged upon the work of this requirement.
7-1.09 HAZARDOUS AREAS
The Contractor shall not permit or allow any person or persons to enter any pipe or space containing hazardous or noxious substances or gases; or where there is an insufficient amount of oxygen to sustain life and consciousness; or any other hazardous area unless equipped with lawful and appropriate safety equipment and life supporting apparatus, and unless those entering are continually monitored and guarded by and in communication with other persons outside the space or area who are equipped in the same way, can give an alarm to others for assistance, and initiate immediate rescue operations in the event of mishap. 7-1.10 EMERGENCIES
A. Work During an Emergency: The Contractor shall perform any and all operations and shall furnish any materials and equipment necessary during an emergency endangering life or, property and, in all cases, shall notify the City Engineer of the emergency as soon as practicable, but shall not wait for instruction before proceeding to properly protect both life and property. Any additional compensation or extension of Contract Time by the Contractor on account of an emergency shall be applied for to the City.
B. Representatives for Emergencies: The Contractor shall file with the Owner a written list giving names, addresses, and telephone numbers of at least two of his/her representatives who can be contacted at any time in case of emergency. The representatives shall be fully authorized and equipped to correct unsafe or inconvenient conditions on short notice. The Contractor shall promptly notify the Owner of all changes in the listing. 7-1.11 SUBMITTALS
Prior to receiving Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall submit to the City Engineer the following:
1) Safety Best Management Practices Plan
2) Detailed Traffic Control Plan
3) Safe Construction Operation Plan
4) A copy of his/her Injury and Illness Prevention Program Manual 5) A list of safety equipment he/she shall maintain on site 6) The names of his/her Safety Officer and Safety Supervisor(s) who shall be responsible for maintaining safety at each work site.
7) Proof of current safety training for all individuals who shall be working on the site. 84 8) A description of any job-specific measures he/she shall be using which are not contained in his/her manual.
The City shall maintain these materials for record purposes. 7-1.12 IMPLEMENTATION
It is the Contractor’s responsibility to follow his/her own safety program and provide one or more designated Safety Supervisor(s) at each work site.
7-1.13 PAYMENT
No separate payment shall be made for maintaining health and safety and it shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various Contract items of work as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
SECTION 8 LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY
8-1.01 LAWS
Contractor shall comply with laws, regulations, orders, and decrees applicable to the project. Indemnify and defend the City against any claim or liability arising from the violation of a law, regulation, order, or decree by you or your employees. Immediately report to the City Engineer a discrepancy or inconsistency between the Contract and a law, regulations, order, decree. If the City incurs any fines or penalties because of the Contractor’s failure to comply with the law, regulation, order, or decree, the City shall deduct the amount of the fine or penalty. Immediately notify the City Engineer, if a regulatory agency requests access to the job site or to records. Submit a list of documents provided by the agency and issued enforcement actions.
8-1.02 GENERAL
Contractor shall comply with provisions of Section 7, “Legal Relations and Responsibility to the Public” of the State Standard Specifications.
Contractor shall exercise special caution against dangerous conditions and provide temporary barricades and fencing as may be necessary to protect the public. During construction within the area of work, barricades, signs, lights, flashers, and other safety devices shall be used by the Contractor to direct vehicle and pedestrian traffic.
The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of CAL-OSHA, the applicable provisions of local, state, and federal regulations governing the project work.
The Contractor shall provide necessary safeguards and shall exercise caution against injury or defacement of any existing site improvements and plantings. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage resulting from their operations and shall repair or replace such damage at their own expense. No trucks or vehicles of any kind shall be allowed to pass over area unless adequate protection is provided. Unless designated otherwise, all existing improvements shall be repaired or replaced, in kind, at the Contractors expense.
Temporary ramps, backfill, or covers for incomplete trenching/backfill operations shall also be furnished by the Contractor at the end of each day’s work for the protection of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 85 The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to the work which occurs before final acceptance.
Contractor to securely cover all openings into the systems and protect all apparatus, equipment, or appliance, both before and after being set in place, to prevent obstructions in the pipes and breakage, misuse, or disfigurement of the apparatus, equipment, or appliance. Contractor shall be responsible for damage to all existing utilities, whether they are indicated on the drawings.
Unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer, the Contractor shall at all times maintain vehicular access to all IWWF facilities.
8-1.03 PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE 9204 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT
Contract Dispute Procedures
Sections 9204(e) and (g) of the California Public Contract Code (“PCC”) provides that the text or a summary of PCC 9204, effective January 1, 2017, shall be included in the plans and specifications for any public works projects that may give rise to a claim under this section and that Section 9204 applies to contracts for public works projects entered into on or after January 1, 2017. In accordance therewith, City of Salinas hereby provides notice and includes the statutory text:
9204. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the best interests of the state and its citizens to ensure that all construction business performed on a public works project in the state that is complete and not in dispute is paid in full and in a timely manner.
(b) Notwithstanding any other law, including, but not limited to, Article 7.1 (commencing with Section 10240) of Chapter 1 of Part 2, Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 19100) of Part 2, and Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 20104) of Chapter 1 of Part 3, this section shall apply to any claim by a contractor in connection with a public works project.
(c) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Claim” means a separate demand by a contractor sent by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested, for one or more of the following:
(A) A time extension, including, without limitation, for relief from damages or penalties for delay assessed by a public entity under a contract for a public works project. (B) Payment by the public entity of money or damages arising from work done by, or on behalf of, the contractor pursuant to the contract for a public works project and payment for which is not otherwise expressly provided or to which the claimant is not otherwise entitled. (C) Payment of an amount that is disputed by the public entity. (2) “Contractor” means any type of contractor within the meaning of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code who has entered into a direct contract with a public entity for a public works project.
(3) (A) “Public entity” means, without limitation, except as provided in subparagraph (B), a state agency, department, office, division, bureau, board, or commission, the California State University, the University of California, a city, including a charter city, county, including a charter county, city and county, including a charter city and county, district, special district, public authority, political subdivision, public corporation, 86 or nonprofit transit corporation wholly owned by a public agency and formed to carry out the purposes of the public agency.
(B) “Public entity” shall not include the following:
(i) The Department of Water Resources as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department. (ii) The Department of Transportation as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department. (iii) The Department of Parks and Recreation as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department. (iv) The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation with respect to any project under its jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 11 (commencing with Section 7000) of Title 7 of Part 3 of the Penal Code. (v) The Military Department as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department. (vi) The Department of General Services as to all other projects. (vii) The High-Speed Rail Authority.
(4) “Public works project” means the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement of any kind. (5) “Subcontractor” means any type of contractor within the meaning of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code who either is in direct contract with a contractor or is a lower tier subcontractor.
(d) (1) (A) Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this section, the public entity to which the claim applies shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days, shall provide the claimant a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Upon receipt of a claim, a public entity and a contractor may, by mutual agreement, extend the time period provided in this subdivision.
(B) The claimant shall furnish reasonable documentation to support the claim. (C) If the public entity needs approval from its governing body to provide the claimant a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the governing body does not meet within the 45 days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the public entity shall have up to three days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the governing body after the 45-day period, or extension, expires to provide the claimant a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion.
(D) Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement. If the public entity fails to issue a written statement, paragraph (3) shall apply.
(2) (A) If the claimant disputes the public entity’s written response, or if the public entity fails to respond to a claim issued pursuant to this section within the time prescribed, the claimant may demand in writing 87 an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand in writing sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the public entity shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of the dispute. (B) Within 10 business days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, the public entity shall provide the claimant a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the contractor in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with the public entity and the claimant sharing the associated costs equally. The public entity and claimant shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing. If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each party shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator. If mediation is unsuccessful, the parts of the claim remaining in dispute shall be subject to applicable procedures outside this section.
(C) For purposes of this section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this section.
(D) Unless otherwise agreed to by the public entity and the contractor in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this section shall excuse any further obligation under Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced.
(E) This section does not preclude a public entity from requiring arbitration of disputes under private arbitration or the Public Works Contract Arbitration Program if mediation under this section does not resolve the parties’ dispute.
(3) Failure by the public entity to respond to a claim from a contractor within the time periods described in this subdivision or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. A claim that is denied by reason of the public entity’s failure to have responded to a claim, or its failure to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section, shall not constitute an adverse finding with regard to the merits of the claim or the responsibility or qualifications of the claimant.
(4) Amounts not paid in a timely manner as required by this section shall bear interest at 7 percent per annum.
(5) If a subcontractor or a lower tier subcontractor lacks legal standing to assert a claim against a public entity because privity of contract does not exist, the contractor may present to the public entity a claim on behalf of a subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor. A subcontractor may request in writing, either on their own behalf or on behalf of a lower tier subcontractor, that the contractor present a claim for work which was performed by the subcontractor or by a lower tier subcontractor on behalf of the subcontractor. The 88 subcontractor requesting that the claim be presented to the public entity shall furnish reasonable documentation to support the claim. Within 45 days of receipt of this written request, the contractor shall notify the subcontractor in writing as to whether the contractor presented the claim to the public entity and, if the original contractor did not present the claim, provide the subcontractor with a statement of the reasons for not having done so.
(e) The text of this section or a summary of it shall be set forth in the plans or specifications for any public works project that may give rise to a claim under this section. (f) A waiver of the rights granted by this section is void and contrary to public policy, provided, however, that (1) upon receipt of a claim, the parties may mutually agree to waive, in writing, mediation and proceed directly to the commencement of a civil action or binding arbitration, as applicable; and (2) a public entity may prescribe reasonable change order, claim, and dispute resolution procedures and requirements in addition to the provisions of this section, so long as the contractual provisions do not conflict with or otherwise impair the timeframes and procedures set forth in this section. (g) This section applies to contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2017. (h) Nothing in this section shall impose liability upon a public entity that makes loans or grants available through a competitive application process, for the failure of an awardee to meet its contractual obligations. (i) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2027, deletes or extends that date. 8-1.04 LABOR NONDISCRIMINATION
Attention is directed to the following Notice that is required by Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2, California Code of Regulations and the City’s Federal Mandated Disadvantage Business Enterprise (“DBE”) Program.
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR NONDISCRIMINATION PROGRAM
(GOV. CODE, SECTION 12990)
Contractor attention is called to the “Nondiscrimination Clause”, set forth in the Provisions in Section 7-
1.021(2), “Nondiscrimination”, of the Standard Specifications, which is applicable to all nonexempt State Contracts and Subcontracts, and to the “Standard California Nondiscrimination Construction Contract Specifications” set forth therein. The Specifications are applicable to all nonexempt state construction Contracts and Subcontracts of $5,000.00 or more.
Furthermore, the prime Contractor or Subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Contract. Failure by the Contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Contract, which may result in the termination of this Contract or such other remedy, as recipient (i.e., the City of Salinas) deems appropriate. 8-1.05 WAGE DETERMINATION
All wage scales shall be in accordance with applicable determinations made by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) of the State of California, as provided by Article 2, Chapter 1, Division 2, Part 7 of the Labor Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 1771. In accordance with Section 1773.2 of the Labor Code, copies of the aforesaid determinations of the Director 89 of the DIR are available on the website address http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm They shall apply to the Construction Contract and all Subcontractors thereunder.
The wage rates determined by the Director of DIR and published in the Department of Transportation publication entitled General Prevailing Wage Rates refer to expiration dates. If the published wage rate does not refer to a predetermined wage rate to be paid after the expiration date, said published rate of wage shall be in effect for the life of this Contract. If the published wage rate refers to a predetermined wage rate to become effective upon expiration of the published wage rate and the predetermined wage rate is on file with the DIR, such predetermined wage rate shall become effective on the date following the expiration date and shall apply to this Contract in the same manner as if it had been published in said publication. If the predetermined wage rate refers to one or more additional expiration dates with additional predetermined wage rates, which expiration dates occur during the life of this Contract, each successive predetermined wage rate shall apply to this Contract on the date following the expiration date of the previous wage rate.
If the last of such predetermined wage rates expires during the life of this Contract, such wage rate shall apply to the balance of the Contract.
The "Statement of Compliance" and "Payroll Report" shall be on forms furnished by the City. Reduced copies of the “Statement of Compliance” and “Payroll Report” forms are attached in Part “C” of these Specifications. No other forms shall be accepted.
All contractors and subcontractors must furnish certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner (aka Division of Labor Standards Enforcement) on a weekly basis and in the format prescribed by the DIR, which may include electronic submission. 8-1.06 PUBLIC SAFETY
The Contractor shall concern himself with public safety at all times during the life of this contract. Work area shall be clearly identified. Public access through the project shall be by means of well-established and delineated corridors (see traffic control item). Materials shall be stockpiled in such a manner as to assure no hazard to the public. Tools and equipment shall be likewise kept locked and out of reach. Work area shall be kept free of garbage and other waste.
The Contractor shall provide for the safety of the traffic and the public in accordance with the Provisions in Section 7-1.09, “Public Safety”, of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. 8-1.07 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
Attention is directed to Section 7-1.08 “Public Convenience” of the Standard Specifications, and these Special Provisions. Safe and adequate pedestrian zones and crossings of work shall be maintained at all times.
8-1.08 PROTECTION OF SITE
The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent damage to the adjacent fencing, roadway, utilities, buildings, and other existing improvements, etc., during the progress of their work and shall be required to make any repairs resulting from their negligence, and no additional compensation shall be made. 90 Attention is directed to Section 7-1.08, “Public Convenience”, and 7-1.09, “Public Safety”, of the Standard Specification, and these Special Provisions. Safe and adequate pedestrian zones and crossings of work shall be maintained at all times unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 8-1.09 DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL
If the Contractor elects to dispose of materials at locations other than those where arrangements have been made by the City, the Contractor shall make arrangements for disposing of the materials outside the right of way and shall pay all costs involved. Arrangements shall include, but not be limited to, entering into agreements with property owners and obtaining necessary permits, licenses, and environmental clearances.
Before disposing of any material outside the right of way, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer satisfactory evidence that the Contractor has entered into agreements with the property owners of the site involved and has obtained the permits, licenses and clearances.
In those instances, in which the Department has compiled “Materials Information” as referred to in Section 2-1.07, “Job Site and Document Examination”, of the State Standard Specifications, the compilation will include the documents setting forth the arrangement made with some of the property owners for the disposal of material on those owner’s properties.
The Contractor is cautioned to make such independent investigation and examination as the Contractor deems necessary to be satisfied as to the quantity and type of materials which may be disposed of on the property and the rights, duties and obligations acquired or undertaken under the arrangement with the property owner.
Notwithstanding that the Contractor may elect to dispose of materials on any such property owner’s property, no material may be disposed of on that property unless the Contractor has first either:
1) Executed a document that will guarantee to hold the owner harmless from all claims for injury to persons or damage to property resulting from the Contractor's operations on the property owner's premises and also agree to conform to all other provisions set forth in the arrangement made between the Department and the property owner. The document will be prepared by the Engineer for execution by the Contractor, or
2) Entered into an agreement with the owner of the disposal site on any terms mutually agreeable to the owner and the Contractor; provided that the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a release, in a form satisfactory to the Engineer, executed by the owner, relieving the Department of any and all obligations under the Department's arrangement with the owner.
SECTION 9 PAYMENT
9-1.01 BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION, LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
AND TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF WORK
The Contractor’s attention is directed to the Provisions of Section 8, “Prosecution and Progress”, Section 8-1.02, “Schedule”, Section 8-1.04, “Start of Job Site Activities”, and Section 8-1.10, “Liquidated Damages” of the State Standard Specifications and the following Provisions:
91 The Contractor shall begin the work within 15 calendar days after the Notice to Proceed by the City Engineer and the Contractor shall diligently prosecute the work to completion on or before the expiration of 40 Working Days. This does not include the allotted 30 calendar days for material submittals, the ordering, and receiving of materials.
A working day shall be any day other than a legal holiday, Saturday, Sunday, or designated non-workday on which the normal working forces of the Contractor should proceed with regular work for at least 6 hours toward completion of the Contract. If the Contractor schedules work on designated non-work day(s) such as weekend or holidays, the Contractor shall reimburse the City of Salinas for inspection services rendered by the City of Salinas or its consultant.
The Contractor shall pay to the City of Salinas the sum of $1,300.00 per day for each and every calendar day delay in finishing the work in excess of the time of completion prescribed above.
Before work may begin, a pre-construction conference/virtual meeting shall be held with the City Engineer or their designee for the purpose of discussing with the Contractor the scope of work, Contract Plans, Specifications, existing conditions, materials to be ordered, equipment to be used, and all essential matters pertaining to the prosecution of and the satisfactory completion of the project as required. The Contractor’s representative at this conference/virtual meeting shall include all major superintendents for the work and may include major Subcontractors.
Section 8-1.04B of the State Standard Specifications is amended by adding the following:
The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer, in writing, of their intent to begin work at least 5 calendar days in advance before work is begun for this project. The notice shall be delivered to City Engineer’s Office and shall specify the date the Contractor intends to start. If the project has more than one location of work, a separate notice shall be given for each location.
Section 8-1.04B is further amended to read:
Notice in writing of the Contractor’s intention to start work prior to approval, specifying the date on which he/she intends to start, shall be given to the City Engineer at least 5 calendar days in advance.
The Contractor shall immediately comply with written order of the City Engineer to suspend work wholly or in part in accordance with the Provisions in Section 8-1.06 of the State Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions.
9-1.02 SCHEDULE OF VALUES
The Schedule of Values shall conform to the Provisions in Section 9-1.16B, of the State Standard Specifications, and these Special Provisions.
The City Engineer shall be furnished a Schedule of Values for each Contract Lump Sum item of work described within these Special Provisions and where noted in these Special Provisions. 92 The Schedule of Values shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval within 15 calendar days after the Contract has been approved. The Schedule of Values shall be approved, in writing, by the City Engineer before any partial payment for any of the lump sum items of work shall be made. 9-1.03 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
Payment for all labor, materials, tools, equipment and other appurtenances required for the proper, substantial and complete-in-place project construction for COVENTRY STREET AND VICTOR STREET TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES as shown on the Plans and/or outlined in these Special Provisions.
Except for authorized changes in the work, payment for said complete-in-place finished work or improvement shall be made only on the basis of the Contract item of work listed in the Proposal. The various Contract item prices paid for the work required, for COVENTRY STREET AND VICTOR STREET TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES, complete-in-place, including full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, for doing all the work provided in these Plans and Specifications and Contract, or required for the proper completion of the work as whole, for which no separate payment has been provided shall be a supplementary obligation for the Contractor item of work listed in the Proposal.
9-1.04 PROGRESS PAYMENTS AND RETENTION
The Contractor's attention is directed to Section 9, “Measurement and Payment” of the Standard Specifications.
The City shall retain 5% of such estimated value of the work done and 5% of the value of materials so estimated to have been furnished and delivered and unused and furnished and stored as aforesaid as part security for the fulfillment of the Contract by the Contractor.
The Contractor shall submit Subcontractor and/or supplier’s waiver of liens as required under Civil Code Article 8122-8138. The waiver shall be "conditional" before payment and "unconditional" after payment.
The unconditional waivers ensure that all subcontractors are promptly paid.
As provided in Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code and Section 10263 of the Government Code, Contractor may request that any retention to be withheld during the course of a project is paid to an escrow agent at the Contractor's expense. Should the Contractor make such request, it will be required that an appropriate Escrow Agreement as provided in said government codes be fully executed prior to any payment of retention withheld or to be withheld. The City Engineer or their delegate is authorized to execute said Escrow Agreement on behalf of the City.
The Contractor shall submit the progress payment pay application to the Engineer for review and approval.
The Engineer shall review it within seven (7) calendar days of receipt. The Engineer shall either deny and return the progress payment pay application to the Contractor for correction or recommend approval and forward it to the City for processing. The required attachments to the monthly progress payment pay application shall include:
93 a. Certified Payroll Reports: All current payroll reports and statement of compliance for the Contractors and all subcontractors (to be completed through the last day of work in the pay application)
b. Daily Reports: All current Daily Reports for the Contractor, all Subcontractors, and owner operators. Daily reports shall contain the name, classification, and detailed task listing of all personnel and equipment, including all subcontractors and owner operators (to be completed through the date of pay application)
c. Quantity Calculations: Certified quantity calculations to justify all pay quantities and amount requested.
d. Monthly Schedule: The Contractor shall submit an updated, revised construction schedule to the Engineer with each pay application.
e. Unconditional Waiver of Lien Releases: The Contractor shall submit Subcontractor and/or supplier’s waiver of liens as required under Civil Code Article 8122-8138. The waiver shall be “conditional” before payment and “unconditional” after payment on forms set forth in the statute.
Failure to provide any of the documents as listed above will result in the Engineer returning the monthly pay application to the Contractor with no action.
Payment for all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and other appurtenances required for the proper, substantial, and complete-in-place for the project as shown on the Plans and/or outlined in these Special Provisions.
9-1.05 PROMPT PROGRESS PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS
A prime Contractor or Subcontractor shall pay any Subcontractor not later than 7 calendar days of receipt of each progress payment in accordance with the Provision in Section 7108.5 of the California Business and Professions Code concerning prompt payment to Subcontractors. The 7 calendar days are applicable unless a longer period is agreed to in writing between the Contractor and the City Engineer. Any delay or postponement of payment over 30 calendar days may take place only for good cause and with the City Engineer prior written approval. Any violation of Section 7108.5 shall subject the violating Contractor or Subcontractor to the penalties, sanction, and other remedies of that Section. Federal law (49 CFR 26.29) requires that any delay or postponement of payment over 30 calendar day of receipt of each payment may take place only for good cause and with the City’s prior written approval. These requirements shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies otherwise available to the prime Contractor or Subcontractor in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime Contractor, deficient subcontract performance, or noncompliance by a Subcontractor. This Provision applies to both Contractors and Subcontractors.
9-1.06 PROMPT PAYMENT OF FUNDS WITHHELD TO SUBCONTRACTORS The City of Salinas shall hold retainage from the prime Contractor and shall make prompt and regular incremental acceptances of portions, as determined by the City of Salinas, of the Contract work, and pay retainage to the prime Contractor based on these acceptances. The prime Contractor, or Subcontractor, shall return all monies withheld in retention from all Subcontractors within 7 calendar days for construction 94 contracts and 15 calendar days for consultant contracts after receiving payment for work satisfactorily completed and accepted including incremental acceptances of portions of the Contract work by the City of Salinas. Any delay or postponement of payment may take place only for good cause and with the City Engineer prior written approval. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating prime Contractor or Subcontractor to the penalties, sanctions, and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the California Business and Professions Code and Section 10262 of the California Public Contract Code for construction contracts, and Section 3321 of the California Civil Code for consultant contracts. This requirement shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies otherwise available to the prime Contractor or Subcontractor in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime Contractor; deficient subcontractor performance and/or noncompliance by a Subcontractor. 9-1.07 INCREASE OR DECREASE QUANTITY
The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity specified in the Proposal, as deemed necessary, by more than 25% and eliminate any item or work without the adjustment of Contract Unit Prices.
9-1.08 COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENTS FOR OIL PRICE INDEX FLUCTUATIONS There shall be no compensation adjustments for oil price fluctuations for this project. 9-1.09 ARBITRATION
Contractor attention is directed to Section 9-1.22 “Arbitration,” of the State Standard Specifications. In the event of a dispute as to whether the conditions materially differ or do involve hazardous waste, the Contractor shall continue to proceed with all work to be performed under the Contract and shall retain all rights provided either by Contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of any dispute or protest.
Arbitration shall be initiated by a Complaint in Arbitration made in compliance with the requirements of said regulations. A Complaint in Arbitration by the Contractor shall be made not later than 180 calendar days after the date of service in person or by mail on the Contractor of the final written decision by the Department of the claim.
SECTION 10 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
SECTION 10-1 GENERAL
10-1.01 ORDER OF WORK
All work under this project shall be scheduled, coordinated and executed as necessary to permit construction to be completed within the constraints of the project. The Contractor and utility companies shall coordinate and schedule their operations to minimize disruptions or delays. The utility company's Contractors shall perform their utility work prior to overlay, new road section, rough grading, clearing and grubbing.
All operations shall be coordinated to eliminate any possibility of damage, or unnecessary removal, replacements and/or modifications to existing facilities or to facilities constructed under this project.
The Contractor shall not begin work until all materials are on hand, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer.
95 The Contractor shall submit a Traffic Control Plan of his/her proposed construction operation together with a diagram indicating his/her layout for traffic control. This Plan shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and shall be submitted at least 10 calendar days prior to the beginning of any construction of any work. No work shall begin until the Plans have been approved by the City Engineer.
The Plan shall show the type of location of advanced warning signs for construction phasing, construction, scheduling, details, lane closures and other items deemed necessary by the City Engineer and shall be in accordance with the Provisions in Section 7 "Legal Responsibilities" of these Special Provisions. 10-1.02 BASELINE SCHEDULE
A baseline schedule shall be prepared by the Contractor for this Contract and shall conform to the Provisions in Section 8-1.02C(6) "Baseline Schedule" of the State Standard Specifications and shall be delivered to the City Engineer at the pre-construction meeting. No work shall begin until the Baseline Schedule has been approved by the City Engineer.
Such baseline schedule (bar chart type or other) shall show coordination of major portions of the work including utility relocations/adjustments and other related work by others.
The Contractor shall schedule operations in cooperation with other Contractors and the utility companies to avoid unnecessary conflicts, delays, and disruptions to the progress of this project. Attention should be given to scheduling of all land disturbance activities in dry season (May 1 – Sept 30). 10-1.03 PROGRESS SCHEDULE
A progress schedule shall be prepared by the Contractor for this Contract and shall conform to Section 8-
1.02 “Schedule” of the State Standard Specifications, as applicable, and shall be delivered to the City Engineer at the pre-construction meeting. No work shall begin until the Baseline Schedule has been approved by the City Engineer.
Such progress schedule (bar chart type or other) shall show coordination of major portions of the work including utility relocations/adjustments and other related work by others.
The progress schedule shall be amended as necessary if progress varies significantly from the schedule and at a minimum, every four weeks.
The Contractor shall schedule operations in cooperation with other Contractors and the utility companies, as applicable, to avoid unnecessary conflicts, delays, and disruptions to the progress of this project. 10-1.04 WORKMANSHIP
All work performed under this Contract shall be of the highest quality of the trade and the Contractor shall employ only workers who are skilled and thoroughly familiar with the type of improvements proposed. 10-1.05 WARRANTIES
All equipment furnished by the Contractor shall be guaranteed to the City of Salinas by the manufacturers for a period of not less than one (1) year following the date of acceptance of all system installations. The contractor shall immediately repair and/or replace all defective materials and workmanship discovered within one year after acceptance by the City.
96 10-1.06 OBSTRUCTIONS
Attention is directed to Section 8-1.10 “Utility and Non-Highway Facilities” and Section 15, Existing Highway Facilities, of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. 10-1.07 UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTIONS
Other than utility work, the removal and relocation of all underground obstructions, including but not limited to sprinkler systems, water mains or electrical conduits shall also be the responsibility of the Contractor and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.
Repair of pipes, electrical conduits and other appurtenances due to accidental or convenience removals shall be at the expense of the Contractor.
Adjust existing utility frames, covers, and manholes to new grade as shown on the Plans and as specified in Section 15-2.05A, “Frames, Covers, Grates, and Manholes”, of the Standard Specifications.
Payment for the adjustment of utility frames, covers, and manholes shall be included in the prices paid for the various Contract items of work as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
10-1.08 SUBMITTALS/DRAWINGS OF RECORD/CRITERIA FOR FURNISHING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO CONTRACTOR
The Contractor shall review, stamp, and sign with his/her approval and submit, with promptness and in orderly sequence so as to cause no delay in the work or in the work of any Contractor, all shop drawings and samples required by the Contract Documents or subsequently by the City Engineer as covered by modifications. Shop drawings and samples shall be properly identified as specified, or as the City Engineer may require. At the time of submission, the Contractor shall especially inform the City Engineer in writing of any deviation in the shop drawings or samples from the requirements of the Contract Documents. (The mere inclusion of the information is not sufficient notice.) Shop drawings, including manufacturer's literature, catalog cuts, or other printed material shall be entitled with the name of the product on each sheet and shall otherwise be identified by listing the particular Division, Section Article or reference of the work pertaining thereto. Differing items shall not be submitted on the same sheet.
By approving and submitting shop drawings and samples, the Contractor thereby represents that he/she has determined and verified all field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, catalog number and similar data, or shall do so, and that he/she has checked and coordinated each shop drawing and sample with the requirements of the work and the Contract Documents.
Allow two weeks minimum for review. Allow additional time if processing must be delayed to permit coordination with subsequent submittals. Allow one week for reprocessing each submittal.
No extension of Contract time will be authorized because of failure to transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the work to permit processing.
The City Engineer shall review and approve any shop drawings and samples with reasonable promptness as to cause no delay, but only for conformance with the design concept of the project and with the 97 information given in the Contract Documents. The City Engineer's approval of a separate item shall not indicate approval of an assembly in which the item functions.
The Contractor shall make any corrections required by the City Engineer and shall resubmit the required number of corrected copies of shop drawings or new samples until approved. The Contractor shall direct specific attention in writing or on resubmitted shop drawings to revisions other than the correction requested by the City Engineer on previous submissions. Corrected shop drawings shall be resubmitted in the same manner as called for above.
The City Engineer's approval of shop drawings or samples shall not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for any deviation from the requirements of the Contract Documents unless the Contractor has specifically informed the City Engineer in writing of such deviation at the time of the submission, and the City Engineer has given written approval to the specified deviation; nor shall the City Engineer's approval relieve the Contractor form responsibility for errors or omissions in the shop drawings or samples.
No portion of the work requiring a shop drawing submission, including ordering of materials, shall be commenced until the submission has been approved by the City Engineer. All such portions of the work shall be in accordance with approved shop drawings and samples. Any work placed without submittals being made shall be replaced by Contractor at his/her own expense, if directed by the City Engineer.
Whenever work is specified to conform to approved samples on file in the City Engineer’s Office, conformance shall be required in all respects and the City Engineer's decision in respect to such conformity shall be final.
Where Specifications require manufacturer's printed installation directions, submit duplicate copies of such directions for approval.
The Contractor shall provide and maintain an up-to-date complete "RECORD DRAWING" record on a separate set of construction Plans which shall show every change from the original drawings and Specifications. Prints for this purpose may be obtained from the City Engineer. This set of drawings is to be kept on the site and to be used only as a record set.
These Plans shall also serve as work progress sheets, and the Contractor shall make neat and legible annotations thereon daily as the work proceeds, showing the work as actually installed. These drawings shall be available at all times for inspection and to be kept in a location designated by the City Engineer.
At the project pre-construction meeting, the City Engineer shall furnish two sets of the Plans and Specifications to the Contractor and an additional set for each of the listed Subcontractors. If additional sets are requested, the Contractor will be charged for any extra sets requiring reproduction and binding at the rate specified in the Notice to Bidders.
On or before the date of final inspection, the Contractor shall deliver the corrected and completed "RECORD DRAWING" to the City Engineer. Contractor shall furnish in duplicate two binders of all manufacturers' literature brochures, manuals, parts list, instructions, etc., for all electrical and mechanical equipment as required to be furnished and installed by the Contractor. Submissions of this literature in a haphazard method will not be acceptable. Failure to submit "RECORD DRAWING" shall be caused to withhold final payment and not accept the project.
98 Record Plans are required under Section 8-1.03 and may be recorded and submitted via readily readable electronic media such as CD, DVD or USB memory.
The “RECORD DRAWING” shall be accurate and up to date with approval of the City Engineer before each progress payment shall be made.
10-1.09 WATERING
Watering, if any, shall conform to the provisions in Section 17, “Watering”, of the Standard Specifications, except that full compensation for developing water supply shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various Contract items of work involving the use of water and no separate payment will be made.
Where applicable, City of Salinas Code Chapter 36A Water Conservation will take priority. 10-1.10 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS AND STAKING
The Contractor shall provide the appropriate construction staking to establish lines and grades as necessary to permit satisfactory completion of the Contract work. Payment for construction surveys and staking shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various Contract items of work and no additional payment shall be allowed, therefore.
10-1.11 SURVEY MONUMENTS
Contractor shall protect survey monuments on and off the right of way. Upon discovery of a survey monument not identified and located by the City, immediately:
1. Stop work near the monument
2. Notify the Engineer
Do not resume work near the monument until authorized.
Should a monument be disturbed or damaged, the Contractor shall notify the Engineer and shall restore, replace, repair, or reestablish monument or accessories to monuments. All construction surveying shall be performed by or under the direction of a licensed Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer, who is authorized to practice land surveying, retained or provided for by the Contractor.
The Contractor shall retain a Licensed Surveyor, or a Registered Engineer authorized to practice land surveying within the State of California to research, locate and reset Survey Monuments, including record monuments that are missing. The Contractor is responsible for the filing and recording of the Survey Monuments. The Contractor shall provide the City with a final copy of Record of Survey or Corner Record as filed.
City monuments shall be as specified in the Standard Specifications per Section 81.
All costs to the Contractor for protecting, removing, restoring, repairing, or reestablishing monuments or accessories to monuments or costs associated with the preparation or filing of Corner Records pursuant to Sections 8700 and 8806 of the Business and Professional Code, and submitting copies of recorded corner records to the City, shall be included in the prices paid for the various Contract items as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore. 99 10-1.12 PROJECT SIGNS
The Contractor shall install furnished signs (City of Salinas financing signs) with new hardware and 4”x 6” pressure treated posts. Signs shall be picked up by the Contractor at a designated location to be named at a later date by the City Engineer. The signs shall be installed in both vehicle directions at the beginning and the end of the project limits. The Contractor shall remove the City signs when requested by the City Engineer and deliver to a designated location.
10-1.13 CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS
Reserved.
10-1.14 CLEAN UP
Throughout all phases of construction including suspension of work and until final acceptance of the project by the City of Salinas Council, the Contractor shall keep the work site clean and free from rubbish and debris. The Contractor shall also abate dust nuisance by cleaning, sweeping and sprinkling with water, or other means as necessary. The use of water resulting in mud on public street and or City right-of-way shall not be permitted as a substitute for sweeping or other methods.
Failure of the Contractor to comply with the City Engineer’s clean up orders may result in an order to suspend the work until the condition is corrected. No additional compensation shall be allowed therefore as a result of such suspension.
At the completion of the work, a final inspection will be made by the City Engineer. The Contractor will be responsible for final cleanup of the project area in accordance of the Provisions with Section 4-1.13 of the State Standard Specifications.
Payment for maintaining the work site clean shall be included in the prices paid for the various Contract items as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore. 10-1.15 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE REDUCTION
PLAN/RECYCLING
Throughout all phases of construction including suspension of work, and until final acceptance of the project, the Contractor shall keep the work site clean and free from rubbish and debris. Salinas Municipal Code 9-4.1 requires all Construction and Demolition (“C&D”) projects within the City to divert at least 65% of the C&D debris and 100% of inert materials generated by the project. In addition, all building and demolition project contractors must prepare and submit a C&D Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan prior to commencement of project and a final C&D Waste Reduction and Recycling Report to the City Engineer’s Office upon completion of the project. Further information can be found in the Construction and Demolition (C&D) Diversion Requirements and Instructions in Part F of this document.
Failure to submit a “C&D Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan" and file a “C&D Waste Reduction and Recycling Report” may result in non-compliance fees and shall be cause to withhold final payment and not accept the project.
The Contractor shall also abate dust nuisance by cleaning, sweeping, and sprinkling with water, or other means, as necessary. The use of water resulting in mud on public streets will not be permitted as a substitute for sweeping or other methods.
100
Failure of the Contractor to comply with the City Engineer's or designee’s clean up orders may result in an order to suspend the work until the condition is corrected. No additional compensation will be allowed as a result of such suspension.
SECTION 10-2 REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL/SALVAGEEXISTING FACILITIES 10-2.01 GENERAL
The Contractor shall remove all appurtenances as shown on Plans. All removed material shall become the property of the Contractor (unless noted otherwise on the Plans) and shall be disposed of as provided in Section 17-2.03D, “Disposal of Materials”, of the State Standard Specifications and in accordance with “C&D Waste Reduction and Recycling Report”.
Payment for the removal and disposal/salvage of existing facilities shall be included in the prices paid for the various Contract items as listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
All accidental or convenience removals of existing facilities by the Contractor shall be at the expense of the Contractor, and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. 10-2.02 REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS AND HAZARDEOUS SUBSTANCES
If applicable, when the presence of asbestos or hazardous substances are not shown on the Plans or indicated in the Special Provisions and the Contractor encounters materials which the Contractor reasonably believes to be asbestos or a hazardous substance as defined in the Provisions in Section 25914.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and the asbestos or hazardous substance has not been rendered harmless, the Contractor may continue work in unaffected areas reasonably believed to be safe. The Contractor shall immediately cease work in the affected area and report the condition to the City Engineer in writing immediately.
In conformance with the Provisions in Section 25914.1 of the Health and Safety Code, removal of asbestos or hazardous substances including exploratory work to identify and determine the extent of the asbestos or hazardous substance shall be performed by separate Contract.
If delay of work in the area delays the current controlling operation, the delay shall be considered a rightof-way delay and the Contractor shall be compensated for the delay in conformance with the Provisions in Section 8-1.07. “Delays” and Section 19-1.03B, “Unsuitable Material”, of the State Standard Specifications.
SECTION 11 ITEMS OF CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 11-1 GENERAL
All items of work listed in the Proposal Section shall conform to the Plans, City of Salinas Standard Specifications and Standard Plans, 2024 State Standard Specifications, and these Special Provisions.
The Contractor shall refrain from using diesel fuel or solvents of any kind for cleaning tools and equipment in such a manner as to permit spillage of parkways or other improved areas. 101
SECTION 11-2 EARTHWORK
11-2.01 GENERAL
The work performed in connection with trenching, compaction, excavation, backfill, and other earthwork operations shall be in accordance with Section 19, “Earthwork” of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions.
Surplus excavation materials including native soil, concrete, asphalt concrete, concrete base, and subbase material shall become property of the Contractor and shall be disposed in accordance with the Provisions and State Standard Specifications.
Protection of work shall be from outside sources of water such as runoff from adjacent lands shall be the responsibility of the Contractor; unstable conditions resulting from improper protection shall be the responsibility of the Contractor, and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
Unless specified otherwise, payment for miscellaneous earthwork operations including saw cutting, pavement removals, trenching and structure excavations , backfill, and compaction and disposal shall be included in the prices paid for the various Contract items and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.
The cost of excavation, rough, and final grading to the depths shown on the Plans shall be included in the prices paid for the various Contract items and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore. 11-2.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE
The City of Salinas uses a Quality Assurance Program (QAP) to ensure a material is produced to comply with the Contract. The Contractor may examine the records and reports of tests the City of Salinas performs if they are available at the job site. Schedule work to allow time for QAP. 11-2.03 HAULING
The payment for hauling shall be considered included in the prices paid for the various Contract items listed in the Proposal and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore. 11-2.04 GRADE TOLERANCE
Grade tolerance shall conform to the Provisions in Section 19-1.03, “Grade Tolerance”, of the Standard Specifications.
SECTION 11-3 ASPHALT CONCRETE
11-3.01 GENERAL
Asphalt concrete (AC) shall be placed in accordance with the Plans, the applicable Provisions of the State Standard Specifications, and these Special Provisions. The work to be performed shall include but not limited to: removal and disposal of existing AC pavement; preparation of area and subgrade; placement of Class 2 aggregate base materials when required; paint binder, prime coat, and placing of Type “A” HMA as specified within these Special Provisions.
The AC overlay areas shall be in accordance with the Plans, the applicable Provisions of the City of Salinas Standard Specifications, the applicable Provisions of the State Standard Specifications, and these Special 102
Provisions. Contractor shall remove existing asphalt concrete to the depths as indicated in the Plans.
Contractor shall compact existing aggregate base to 95% relative compaction prior to the placement of asphalt concrete.
Pavement restoration due to the trenching and/or excavation operation for the various improvements shall be in accordance with the Plans and these Special Provisions. 11-3.02 PRIME COAT
Prime coat shall be liquid asphalt SC-250. One application of SC-250 prime coat shall be applied at the rate of 0.25 gallons per square yard to all surfaces of base rock which are to be paved with asphalt concrete. 11-3.03 PAINT BINDER
Paint binder shall be RS-1 type asphaltic emulsion per Section 94 of the Standard Specifications. Paint binder shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallons per square yard per Section 93 and 94 of the Standard Specifications. Paint binder shall be applied to all vertical surfaces of existing pavement, curbs, gutters, and construction joints in the surfacing against which additional material is to be placed to a pavement to be surfaced and as designated by the City Engineer.
11-3.04 TACK COAT
The Engineer calculates the Quantity of asphalt in Tack Coat (QTC) as either of the following:
1. Asphalt binder using the asphalt binder total tons placed as tack coat.
2. Asphaltic emulsion by applying the formula to the asphaltic emulsion total tons placed as tack coat. 11-3.05 ASPHALTIC EMULSION
The Engineer calculates the quantity of asphalt in asphaltic emulsions, including fog seals and tack coat, using the following formula:
Qe = AETT x (Xe/100)
where:
Qe = quantity in tons of asphalt used in asphaltic emulsion AETT = undiluted asphaltic emulsion, total tons placed
Xe = minimum percent residue specified in Section 94 based on the type of emulsion used You may determine Xe by submitting daily test results for asphalt residue for the asphaltic emulsion used.
If you choose this option, you must:
1. Take 1 sample for every 200 tons but not less than 1 sample per day in the presence of the Engineer from the delivery truck, at midload from a sampling tap or thief, and as follows:
1.1. Draw and discard the 1st gallon.
103
1.2. Take 2 separate ½ gal samples.
2. Submit the 1st sample at the time of sampling
3. Furnish the 2nd sample within 3 business days of sampling to an authorized laboratory that participates in the AASHTO Proficiency Sample Program.
4. Submit test results from the laboratory within 10 business days of the sample date. 11-3.01 REMOVAL OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
Existing asphalt concrete pavement shall be sawcut to a straight and clean cut where shown on the Plans.
All contaminated water shall be vacuumed and disposed of in an environmentally approved fashion. All asphalt removal shall have vertical surfaces created by saw cutting or any other approved method proposed by the Contractor that results in an acceptable vertical surface. Rounded edges of surrounding asphalt concrete areas will not be accepted for placement of AC. Tack coat and/or prime coat shall be applied to all existing horizontal and vertical surfaces prior to placement of asphalt concrete including base material with no additional compensation. Work of this item shall comply with all requirements of the Standard Specifications for subgrade and asphalt concrete.
Saw cut edges damaged during the progress construction shall be re-cut to provide a straight and even line, at no additional cost to the City.
SECTION 11-4 CONCRETE FACILITIES
11-4.01 GENERAL
The furnishing and installation of concrete facilities shall conform to the applicable provisions in Section 73, “Concrete Curbs and Sidewalk”, and Section 90, “Portland Concrete Cement”, of the Standard Specifications, the Plans, and these Special Provisions. Concrete shall be Class 3 and shall be placed as shown on the Plans.
All contaminated water shall be vacuumed and disposed of in an environmentally approved fashion.
Contractor shall provide sufficient forces to perform the necessary construction of this project in order that all work shall be completed within the time frame established for this project.
Contractor shall contact U.S.A. (Underground Service Alert, telephone number 811) 48 hours in advance before performing any trenching or excavation work.
Existing concrete facilities damaged during construction, convenience removals, and miscellaneous concrete transitions shall be reconstructed at the expense of the Contractor and no additional compensation shall be made.
11-4.02 REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER
Removal and disposal of concrete sidewalk and curb and gutter shall conform to the Provisions in Section 15, “Existing Highway Facilities”, of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. 104
Existing concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be cut to a minimum depth of one and one-half inches (1- 1/2”) with an abrasive type saw at the first scoring line at or beyond the planned joint or as shown on the Plans or as indicated by the City Engineer.
11-4.03 CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER Construction of concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter shall conform to the Provisions in Section 73 and 90 of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions.
Concrete sidewalk shall be constructed per City of Salinas Standard Plan No. 2R and as shown on the Plans.
Concrete Type “B”, and Type “C” curb and gutter shall be constructed per City of Salinas Standard Plan No.1 and as shown on the Plans.
SECTION 11-5 REINFORCEMENT
11-5.01 GENERAL
Dowel and bar reinforcements in concrete shall be No. 4 and shall be placed as shown on the Plans and in accordance with Section 52 of the Standard Specifications.
SECTION 11-6 AGGREGATEBASE
11-6.01 GENERAL
Aggregate base shall be Class 2 and shall conform to the Provisions in Section 26, “Aggregate Bases”, in the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. Base courses shall be three-quarter of an inch (3/4”) maximum aggregate size. All aggregate bases shall be compacted to 95% relative compaction, Contractor shall prepare soils as necessary to provide a stable subgrade.
SECTION 11-7 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENTSTRIPING AND MARKINGS 11-7.01 GENERAL
Thermoplastic traffic striping and pavement markings shall be applied to pavement surfaces as shown on the Plans and as specified on the City of Salinas Standard Specifications, 2024 State Standard Specifications and Standard Plans, and in accordance with these Special Provisions.
Cat tracking is required before permanent pavement striping and pavement markings are placed and shall be approved by the City Engineer before final pavement striping and pavement markings are installed. For traffic safety all cat tracking shall be performed by the Contractor within 24 hours after the removal of existing pavement striping and markings. Contractor shall install temporary striping immediately after removal of existing pavement markings and shall be maintained in a legible and traffic safety manner by the Contractor until final permanent pavement striping and markings are in place.
Application of thermoplastic pavement striping and markings shall be as specified in Section 84 of the Standard Specifications. Existing surfaces that are to receive the thermoplastic material shall be mechanically wire brushed to remove all dirt and contaminants. Damaged or improper pavement striping and markings shall be immediately removed from the surface it was applied to, at the Contractor’s expense.
All of the equipment used in the application of traffic striping shall produce stripes of uniform quality that conform to the specified requirements.
105
11-7.02 MATERIALS
Traffic stripes and pavement markings must be retroreflective. Traffic stripes shall be alkyd thermoplastic material and glass beads, thermoplastic material shall be “lead free”. Materials used for traffic stripes and pavement markings shall be as specified in Section 84-2.02 of the Standard Specifications.
White thermoplastic stripes and markings shall meet a minimum retroreflectivity of 700 mcdꞏm-2ꞏlx-1.
Yellow thermoplastic stripes and markings shall meet a minimum retroreflectivity of 500 mcdꞏm-2ꞏlx-1 when measured under ASTM E1710 or ASTM E3320.
11-7.01 REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS Removal of existing pavement striping and pavement markings shall be performed by disk grinder or other pre-approved methods by the City Engineer. The contractor shall not use a pavement grinder to remove the striping. All work shall be subject to inspection at all times by the City Engineer.
SECTION 11-8 SIGNS
11-8.01 GENERAL
All work and materials for signs shall conform to the Provisions in Section 56 of the City of Salinas Standard Specifications, and the latest edition of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), and as shown on the Plans. All new sign panels should meet the minimum CA-MUTCD retroreflectivity standards. All signs furnished shall have anti-graffiti sheeting. The Contractor shall furnish all mounting hardware. Signs shall be constructed of a minimum 0.080 inch thick aluminum alloy. 11-8.02 SIGN POST
New sign posts shall be 2”x 2” square tube posts with 7/18 inch knockouts, 1 inch on center, on all four sides. Posts shall be 12 gauge steel 0.105 inch thick and conform to ASTM A1011. Bolts, nuts and washers shall conform to ASTM A 307 and shall be galvanized. The sign panel shall be upright and level. All hardware shall be tightened securely. All new sign posts shall be plumb and free of vertical or lateral movement. All signs located within a walking area shall have a minimum clearance of 7 feet and new sign posts should be sized accordingly. Unless otherwise noted on Plans or in these Special Provisions. 11-8.03 ANCHORAGE
Anchor sleeve shall be 2 1/4” x 2 1/4” inner diameter and 2 1/2” x 2 1/2” outer diameter square tube posts with 7/18 inch knockouts, 1 inch on center, on all four sides. Anchor Sleeves shall be 7 gauge heavy duty steel and conform to ASTM A1011. Anchor sleeves shall have a minimum length of 36 inches. Sign post shall be placed in the anchorage sleeve with a minimum overlap of 18 inches and bolt connected.
If new signs are to be installed on sidewalk or concrete, the contractor is required to core a 3 inch diameter hole, 36 inches deep through the pavement or existing surface. After placing the anchor sleeve, fill the hole with a concrete mix footing per City of Salinas Standard Specifications (2008), and level off the top of the concrete so that the final surface is flush and level with surrounding area.
All work shall be subject to inspection at all times by the City Engineer. 106
11-8.04 MOUNTING
All new signs shall be affixed to posts with commercial quality galvanized steel bolts, washers and nuts.
The face of the sign panel shall be protected by placing either a fiber or neoprene washer between a metal washer next to the bolt head and sign face. Sign panels larger than 36”x36” shall be mounted with a back brace.
New signs mounted to existing posts shall have a minimum clearance of 7 feet, if located on a sidewalk. If existing post is not high enough, contractor shall notify the City Engineer. Existing sign posts may vary in shape and style, new signs shall be mounted with appropriate fastening hardware. If an existing post is deteriorated or broken, the contractor shall notify the City Engineer. If existing post is not salvageable, contractor shall install a new post. The sign panel shall be plumb and free of vertical or lateral movement.
All hardware shall be tightened securely.
Straps and saddle brackets for mounting sign panels on lighting standards, sign structure posts, and traffic signal standards must be stainless steel and must conform to the provisions of Section 82 of State Standard Specifications. All work shall be subject to inspection at all times by the City Engineer.
SECTION 11-9 CURB DRAIN AND RECTANGULAR DRAINAGE CHANNEL 11-9.01 GENERAL
Curb drain and rectangular drainage channel shall be Curb-O-Let and shall be installed as shown on the Plans and per manufacturer’s specifications.
SECTION 11-10 DETECTABLEWARNING SURFACE
11-10.01 GENERAL
The Contractor shall furnish and install Armor-Tile Cast-in-Place Inline Dome Tactile Detectable Warning Surface Tile where indicated on the Plans or approved equal by the City Engineer.
SUBMITTALS - The Contractor shall submit manufacturer’s literature describing products, installation, procedures, and routine maintenance.
The Contractor shall submit 2 tile samples (for verification purposes) minimum 6” x 8” of the kind he/she is proposing.
The Contractor shall submit shop plans for products specified showing fabrication details, composite structural system, plans of tile placement including joints, and materials to be used as well as outlining installation materials and procedure.
The Contractor shall submit material test reports from qualified independent testing laboratory indicating that materials proposed for use in compliance with requirements and meet the properties indicated. All test reports shall be conducted on a cast-in-place tactile tile system as certified by a qualified independent testing laboratory.
The Contractor shall submit copies of the manufacturer’s specified maintenance practices for each type of tactile tile and accessory as required.
107
QUALITY ASSURANCE – Provide cast-in-place tactile tiles and accessories as produced by “ArmorTile Tactile System” or approved equal by the City Engineer.
The Contractor shall be an experienced installer of cast-in-place tactile tiles (wet set).
Vitrified Polymer Composite (VPC) cast-in-place tiles shall be an epoxy polymer composition with an ultraviolet stabilized coating employing aluminum oxide particles in the truncated domes. The tile shall incorporate an in-line dome patter of truncated domes 0.2” in height, 0.9” diameter at the base, and 0.4” diameter at the top of dome spaced 2.35” nominal as measured on a diagonal and 1.70” nominal as measured side by side. For wheelchair safety the field area shall consist of a non-slip surface with a minimum of 40-90° raised points 0.045” high, per square inch, or approved equal by the City Engineer.
NOMINAL TILE SIZE
Length and Width 24”x48” 24”x60” 36”x48” 36”x60”
Depth 1.400”+/- 5% maximum
Face Thickness 0.1875 +/- 5% maximum
Length and Width +/- 0.5% maximum
Water absorption of VPC tiles when tested by ASTM-D 570 shall not exceed 0.35%.
Slip resistance of VPC tiles when tested by ASTM-C 1028 the combined wet/dry static co-efficient of friction not to be less than 0.09 on top of domes and field area.
Compressive strength of VPC tile when tested by ASTM-D 695-91 shall not be less than 18,000 psi. Tensile strength of VPC tile when tested by ASTM-D 638-91 shall not be less than 10,000 psi. Flexural strength of VPC tile when tested by ASTM-C293-94 shall not be less than 24,000 psi.
Chemical stain resistance of VPC tile when tested by ASTM-D 543-87 to withstand without discoloration or staining – 1% hydrochloric acid, urine, calcium chloride, stamp pad ink, gum, and red aerosol paint.
Abrasive wear of VPC tile when tested by BYK-Gardner Tester ASTM-D 2468 with reciprocating linear motion of 37 +/- cycles per minute over a 10” travel. The abrasive medium, a 40-grit Norton Metallite sandpaper, to be fixed and leveled to a holder. The combined mass of the sled, weight and wood block to be a 3.2 pounds. Average wear depth shall not exceed 0.030 after 1000 abrasion cycles measured on the top surface of the dome representing the average of three measurement locations per sample.
Fire resistance VPC tile when tested by ASTM-G26-95 for 2000 hours shall exhibit the following resultdeterioration, fading or chalking of surface of the tile.
Gardner Impact to geometry “GE” of the standard when tested by ASTM-D 5420-93 to have a mean failure energy expressed as a function of specimen thickness of not less than 450” lbf/in. A failure is noted if a hairline fracture is visible in the specimen.
108
Accelerated weathering of VPC tile when tested by ASTM-G26-95 for 2000 hours shall exhibit the following result-deterioration, fading or chalking of surface of the tile.
The VPC cast-in-place tiles embedded in concrete shall meet or exceed the following test criteria:
Accelerated aging and freeze thaw test of VCP tile when tested to ASTM-D 1037 shall show no evidence of cracking, delamination, warpage, checking, blistering, color change, loosening of tiles, or other defects.
Salt and spray performance of VPC tile and adhesive system when tested to ASTM-B 117 shall not show any deterioration or other defects after 100 hours of exposure.
Embedment flange spacing shall be 3.0” minimum to 3.1” maximum center-to-center spacing.
DELIVERY, SPACING, AND HANDLING – Tile shall be suitably packaged or crated to prevent damage in shipment or handling. Sturdy wrappings shall protect finished surfaces and part number shall identify tile type.
SITE CONDITIONS – Maintain minimum temperature of 40°F in spaces to receive tactile tiles for at least 48 hours prior to installations, and for not less than 48 hours after installation. Store tactile tile material in spaces where they will be installed for at least 48 hours before beginning installation. Subsequently, maintain minimum temperature of 40°F in areas where work is completed.
The use of water for work, cleaning, dust control, etc. shall not be allowed to come into contact with the passengers and/or public. Provide barricades or screens to protect passengers and/or public.
Disposal of any liquids or other materials of possible contamination shall be made in accordance with federal, state, local laws, and ordinances.
Cleaning materials shall have code acceptable low VOC solvent content and low flammability if used on site.
GUARANTEE – Cast-in-place tactile tiles (wet set) shall be guaranteed in writing by manufacturer for a period of 5 years from date of final completion and acceptance of the project from the City of Salinas. The guaranteed replacement shall include defective work, breakage, deformation, fading, and chalking of finishes and loosening of tiles.
The Vitrified Polymer Composite (VPC) Cast-in-Place Tactile Tile (wet set) shall be Armor-Tile manufactured by Engineered Plastics Incorporated or approved equal by the City Engineer. The VPC shall be free from blemishes. The color shall be yellow conforming to the Federal Standard 595B and color no. 33538 and shall be homogeneous throughout the tile.
INSTALLATION – During all concrete pouring and tile installation procedures ensure adequate safety guidelines are in place and that they are in accordance with these Special Provisions.
The cast-in-place tactile tile shall be one piece, if it cannot be achieved the Contractor shall get approval from the City Engineer to use more than one piece of cast-in-place tactile tile prior to installation. 109
The specifications of the concrete sealants, structural adhesives, fasteners, epoxy chalking, and related materials shall be in strict accordance with these Special Provisions and the guidelines set by their respective manufacturers.
The physical characteristics of the concrete shall be consistent with these Special Provisions while maintaining a slump range of 4 to 7 to permit solid placement of the cast-in-place tile system. An overly wet mix shall cause the cast-in-place system to float, therefore, under these conditions suitable weight such as 2 concrete blocks or sandbags (25 pounds) shall be places on each tile.
The concrete pouring and finishing operations require typical mason’s tools, however, a 4’ long level with electronic slope readout, 25 pounds weights, vibrator, a large white rubber mallet, and small sledge hammer with 2” x 6” x 20” wood tamping plate are specific to the installation of the cast-in-place system.
The concrete shall be poured and finished, true, and smooth to the required dimensions and slope prior to tile placement. Immediately after furnishing the concrete, the electronic level shall be used to check that the required slope is achieved. The tile shall be placed true and square to the curb edge in accordance with the Plans and Special Provisions. The cast-in-place tiles shall be tamped or vibrated into the fresh concrete to ensure that the field level of tile is flush to the adjacent concrete surface. The Plans indicate that the tile field level (base of truncated dome) is flush to adjacent surfaces to permit proper water drainage and eliminate tripping hazards between adjacent finishes. The tolerance for elevation differences between tile and adjacent surface is 1/16”.
Immediately after tile placement, the tile elevation is to be checked to adjacent concrete. The tile elevation and slope should be set consistent with the Plans to permit water drainage to curb as the design dictates.
While concrete is workable a steel trowel shall be used to trowel the concrete around the tile perimeter to the field level of the tile.
During and after the tile installation and the concrete curing stage, it is imperative that there is no walking, leaning or external force placed on the tile to rock the tile, causing a void between the underside of the tile and concrete.
Following the curing of the concrete, the protective plastic wrap shall be removed from the tile face by cutting the plastic with a sharp knife tight to the concrete/tile interface. If concrete bleeding occurs, a wire brush shall clean the residue without damage to the tile surface.
CLEANING AND PROTECTING – The Contractor shall protect the tile against damage during construction period to comply with tactile tile manufacturer’s specification.
The Contractor shall clean tactile tiles for the final time not more than 4 days prior to date scheduled for final inspection prior to the final acceptance for maintenance by the City of Salinas. Clean tactile tile by method specified by the manufacturer and/or the City Engineer. 110
SECTION 11-11 COBBLESPLASH PAD
11-11.01 GENERAL
Cobble splash pad shall be placed in accordance with the Special Provisions and as shown on the Plans.
Cobbles shall be 4”- 6” in diameter, rounded, washed, and free of debris. Cobbles shall be placed to a minimum of 6” depth.
111
PART E– CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
(BMPS), CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DIVERSION
REQUIREMENTS, AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
INFORMATION
112
[THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
TH E FOLLOWING BMPs MUST BE PROPERLY USED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION SITES TO PROTECT STORM DRAINS AND MINIMIZE POLLUThe City of Salinas Stormwater Management Program prohibits pollutant discharges at work sites from flowing into storm drains and polluting neighborhood creeks, rivers, and the ocean. To comply with the law and keep your project on schedule, make sure proper BMPs are in place and functioning. Sites must be checked and maintained daily. The following BMPs are required; they are not all-inclusive.
Prior tostagingany materials or equipment in theright-of-way (suchas dumpstersor trucks), pleasecontact the applicable local jurisdictiontolearnof any temporary encroachment permit or trafficcontrol requirements necessary for right-of-way stagingand loading areas, applicable stormwater BMPsand safetyplanreviewrequirements. Provide astabilizedvehicle pathwithcontrolled accesstoprevent trackingof dirt offsite. Properly sizesiteentrance BMPsfor anticipatedvehicles.
All paint andstuccomaterial storedonthesitemust becontained and covered. It is illegal todump unused paint or stuccointhesewer or stormdrainsystem. Donot wash out brushes in the street or dump any residues in thestormdrain. Paint brushes and sprayguns must be washed/cleaned out intoahazardous materials drumor backintothe original container and disposed of properly.
Gravel bags, silt fencesand strawwattles(weighted down) areacceptable perimeter controls, andmust beusedtosurround theentiresite.
Avoid running over perimeter controls withvehicles or heavy equipment asthey candamage thematerials. Keep extraabsorbent materials and/or wet-dryvacuumonsitetoquickly pickupunintended spills.
Constructionmaterial must bestoredon siteat all times. Building materials should always be covered when not in usetoprevent runoff caused bywindor rain. Flooding must alsobeprevented by monitoringthesitebefore, during, and after rainevents toensure that BMPs arefunctioning andthat therearenosafetyissues.
Alwayscover dumpsters witharollback tarp. Areas around dumpstersshould beswept daily. Perimeter controls around dumpster areas shouldbeprovided if pollutants areleakingor dischargingfrom thedumpster.
BMPssuchastarps andgravel bags should beimplemented toprevent materials and residuefromentering intothestormdrain system.
The disposal of “wet” constructionmaterials should behandled in the washout area. This includes paint, stucco, and concrete. Useaberm withanimpervious liner tocontain wet materials andprevent runoff in nearby areas. The washout areamust becheckedand maintained daily toensurecompliance. All driedmaterials must bedisposed of at the landfill.
Mounds of dirt or gravel should bestoredon siteand sprayed daily withwater toprevent excessive dust. Duringtherainyseason (October 15th—April 15th) thesematerials shouldbe covered. For thoseareas that areactiveandexposed, awet weather triggered action planincluding additional BMPsshould bein placetoprotect thesite during arain event. Sitesmust have adequate trackingcontrol toprevent thetransport of dirt/gravel fromthesite.
All earthmoving equipment should be stored on site. Maintenance of any equipment should be conducted on site, and mud tracks and dirt trails left by equipment leading to and fromthe site should be cleaned upimmediately.
Stormdrains must be protectedat all timeswithperimeter controls, suchas gravel bags. Sandbags aretypically not usedfor inlet protectionbecause they donot permit flow-through. Replaceruptured or damaged gravel bags and remove thedebris fromtheright-of-way immediately.
Questions? Contact the City of Salinas Public Works Department 831-758-7988 or 831-758-7194
Photo courtesy of the City of San Diego
Remember... C I T Y O F SALINAS
As a Resident or Business Operator
• What we do on land affects the
quality of water we drink and use in
so many ways.
• Many small sources of pollution
add up to cause big water quality
problems.
• Pressure washing or hosing
down sidewalks or driveways
contribute to water pollution.
Mop, sweep or use other dry methods
to clean pavement or grounds around
your home or business.
• Excessive runoff from landscape irrigation can result in water pollution by carrying fertilizers,
pesticides or silt offsite to local water
ways. Regularly inspect your irrigation
system to prevent excessive runoff.
• Trash and Debris dumped or left to
accumulate on residential or business
grounds can wind up local waterways.
Dispose of trash properly. Keep areas
clean and free of trash and debris.
• Natural things such as soil, leaves,
grass clippings, and pet waste can
cause water pollution.
• Waste dumped into storm
sewers goes into creeks and
waterways without treatment.
• Automobiles and other vehicles
cause water pollution as well as air
pollution
Everyone can make a difference!
Reporting of Illegal
Dumping or Suspicious
Discharges:
Reporting will, in great part, rely on
participation from the public.
Residents who observe illegal dumping or
observe pollutants within waterways or
storm sewers should contact the City of
Salinas, Environmental & Maintenance
Services Office.
Dial (831) 758-7233,
Monday – Thursday
8 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Or call 911 after hours, weekends or
holidays to report a stormwater violation.
For non-emergencies use the internet
inquiry form located on the City’s website
address below.
http://www.ci.salinas.ca.us/contact.cfm
This program will succeed with strong
public participation.
Illicit Discharge
Detection &
Elimination
S T O R M W A T E R
P O L L U T I O N
P R E V E N T I O N
Report Illicit Discharges
and Illegal Dumping
Phone: 831-758-7233
or
Dial 911
For Emergency Reporting
City of Salinas - Public Works Department
Environmental & Maintenance Services
426 Work Street, Salinas, Ca. 93901
Non-Emergency Web Contact::
http://www.ci.salinas.ca.us/contact.cfm
What is an
Illicit Dischar g e?
An illicit discharge is defined as
“any discharge into a municipal storm
sewer system that is not composed entirely of stormwater”. Some of the pollutants that fall into this broad category are:
• Car wash wastewater
• Gas and motor oil
• Grass clippings
• Household cleansers
• Paints
• Pesticides
• Pet waste
• Solvents
• Weed killer
Sometimes these pollutants are
carried through the storm drainage system
by rain, wind, or improper disposal into
Salinas Waterways. This can result in
serious health and water quality problems.
In addition, wildlife and the overall
appearance of the creek or waterway is
adversely affected by illicit discharges.
Six Easy Ways That
You Can Keep Illicit
Discharges Out of Our
Local Creeks
There are simple steps that we can take
to solve the problems that our local waterways
face. It is up to YOU, the homeowner and business owners who call Salinas home, to clean it up and to help keep it clean!
1. Used oil, antifreeze, and batteries can
be recycled. Clean up any spills immediately—kitty litter or sawdust will absorb the spill. Be sure to sweep these up as well.
2. Wash your car on the grass so that water,
detergent, and dirt will be filtered by the
soil. Better yet, take your car to a commercial car wash, where the dirty water is sent to the wastewater treatment plant.
3. Empty bottles of household cleansers, pesticides, and weed killer should be disposed of
according to label directions.
4. Grass clippings in the street should be
swept up after each mowing. Grass clippings left in the street are being washed down into the
storm sewers and end up in
the local waterways where
they have the potential to
cause algae blooms.
5. Many household products, including
paints, paint thinners, and solvents
can be taken free of charge to Salinas
Valley Solid Waste Authority, Household
Hazardous Waste drop-off site at 128
Sun St. Salinas, CA 93901, (831) 775-
3000. Paint brushes used with water
based paint can
be rinsed in the sink.
If you have a small
amount of left-over
paint in a can, stuff it
loosely with newspaper, let the paint
dry out completely and put it in the
trash.
6. When walking your pet use a bag or use
a scooper to clean up your pet’s
waste. In order to keep animal waste
from contaminating our community,
anyone who walks a pet should properly
dispose of waste by picking it up, wrapping it, and either placing it into the trash or flushing it UNWRAPPED!
Construction
Sediment from excavation and other
construction projects is the most common
pollutant washed from work sites.
Sediment entering the waterways through
storm drains harms aquatic life and
disrupts the food chain upon which both
fish and people depend.
Erosion Control General Practices
• Keep all construction debris away
from the street, gutter and storm
drain. Look for and clean up material
that may have traveled away from
your property.
• Keep materials out of the rain by
storing them indoors or outdoors with
a secure roof or plastic sheeting.
• Schedule grading and excavation
projects for dry weather.
• Cover excavated material and
stockpiles of asphalt and sand with
plastic tarps.
• Prevent erosion by planting fastgrowing annual and perennial grasses.
These will shield and bind soil.
Recycling & Hazardous Waste Disposal:
Sun Street Transfer Station
Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority
(831) 424-5520
139 Sun Street
Salinas, 93901
To Report a Spill, Illegal Dumping or a
Clogged Storm Drain Call:
(831) 758-7233
City of Salinas
Department of Public Works
Maintenance Division
Look for all other pamphlets for storm
drain protection guidelines:
❑ Automotive Maintenance & Car
Care
❑ Equipment Rentals
❑ Food Service Industry
❑ Fresh Concrete & Mortar
Application
❑ General Construction & Site
Supervision
❑ Heavy Equipment & Earthmoving
Activities
❑ Landscaping, Gardening & Pest
Control
❑ Mobile Washers and Cleaners
❑ Painting
❑ Roadwork & Paving
❑ Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi &
Fountain Maintenance
For more information about storm drain
protection or additional pamphlets, call:
(831) 758-7233
City of Salinas
Department of Public Works
Maintenance Division
Stormwater
Best Management
Practices (BMPs):
Repair and Remodeling
Safe Environmental Habits and
Procedures for:
❑ Landscaping
❑ Painting
❑ Remodeling
❑ Home Owners
Permit Center
65 West Alisal St., Suite 101
Salinas, California 93901
(831) 758-7251
Water Pollution Prevention
It’s Up to Us
Only “rain” is allowed in our storm drain
system. Rain, industrial and household
water mixed with urban pollutants creates
stormwater pollution. The pollutants
include:
Urban runoff pollution (oil and other
automotive fluids, paint and construction
debris, yard and pet wastes, pesticides
and litter). • Flows through the storm drain to the
Salinas River and the Reclamation
Ditch that takes water and debris
straight from Salinas streets to the
Monterey Bay Marine Sanctuary.
•Contaminates our rivers and ditches,
harms aquatic life and increases the
risk of flooding by clogging gutters
and catch basins.
• Oil and grease, for example, clog fish
gills and block oxygen from entering
the water. If oxygen levels in the
water become too low, aquatic
animals may be harmed and/or die.
Household Hazardous Waste Disposal
• Household toxics—such as common
household cleaners, paint products
and motor oil—can pollute our rivers
and poison the groundwater if not
disposed of as hazardous waste.
• Take your household chemicals and
toxics to the local Household
Hazardous Waste Facility.
Concrete & Masonry
Fresh concrete and mortar application
materials can wash down or blow into the
street, gutter or storm drain.
• Do not mix up more fresh concrete or
cement than you will use.
• Store bags of cement and plaster
under cover. Protect these materials
from rainfall, runoff and wind, away
from gutters and storm drains.
• Never dispose of cement washout or
concrete dust onto driveways, streets,
gutters or storm drains.
Painting
Paints and solvents contain chemicals that
are harmful to aquatic life. Toxic
chemicals can come from liquid or solid
products or from cleaning residues on
rags. It is especially important to prevent
these chemicals from entering storm
drains.
Paint Cleanup
• Never clean brushes or rinse paint
containers into a street, gutter or
storm drain.
• For oil-based paints, paint out brushes
to the extent possible. Clean with
thinner and then filter and reuse
thinner.
• For water-based paints, paint out
brushes to the extent possible, then
rinse in the sink.
• When thoroughly dry, used brushes,
empty paint cans (lids off), rags and
drop cloths may be disposed of as
trash.
Paint Removal
• Chemical paint stripping residue,
including saturated rags, is a
hazardous waste and should be taken
to a household hazardous waste
collection event.
• Chips and dust from marine paints or paints containing lead or tributyl tin are also hazardous wastes. Sweep
them up and save them for a
hazardous waste collection event.
Paint Recycling
• Reuse leftover paint for touch-ups or
recycle it at a local household
hazardous waste collection event. Landscaping & Gardening • Intensive gardening and landscaping
increase the likelihood that garden
chemicals and soil will wash into
storm drains. Pesticides and
herbicides not only kill garden
invaders, they also harm insects,
poison fish and contaminate ground
and river water.
• Use organic or non-toxic fertilizers
and pesticides. Do not fertilize or use
gutters or storm drains.
• Store pesticides, fertilizers and
chemicals in a covered area to
prevent runoff.
• Do not blow, sweep, hose or rake
leaves into the street, gutter or storm
drain.
•Place clippings and pruning waste in
approved containers for pick up.
• Conserve water by using drip
irrigation, soaker hoses or micro-spray
systems.
120
POLE DETAIL
NTS
POLE DETAIL
NTS
POLE DETAIL
122
126
ATTACHMENT A: CITY OF SALINAS HOLIDAY SCHEDULE
127
128
PART F – QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#25-323, Version: 1
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Approve a Resolution establishing speed limits as recommended by the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/7/2025
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 12, 2025
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ADRIANA ROBLES, PE, CFM, CITY ENGINEER
JONATHAN HERNANDEZ, JUNIOR ENGINEER
TITLE: 2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED
LIMITS
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a Resolution establishing speed limits as recommended by the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In California, an Engineering and Traffic Survey (“E&TS”) is the tool used to establish a speed limit, surveys are updated every 5-7 years and may be extended up to 14 years. Normally the speed limit is set at the closest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed calculated through the E&TS, but a single 5 mph reduction is permitted based on roadway conditions and constraints.
Speed limits set further below this practice create a “speed trap” that results in the removal of the ability for law enforcement to enforce the roadway with radar per the California Vehicle Code (CVC 40802). This practice changed in July 2024 based on California Assembly Bill – Traffic Safety (AB 43) allowing speed limits establishment to also consider “vulnerable roadway users” and “safety corridors”.
There are nineteen (19) speed surveys that are set to expire on the second half of 2025 and first half of 2026. This report summarizes the proposed E&TS that staff recommends City Council approve a Resolution, adopting the establishment of speed limits as recommended by the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.
BACKGROUND:
The routine analysis and establishment of speed limits on roadways ensures compliance with the Uniform Vehicle Code (“UVC”) established by the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances.
Engineering & Traffic Survey (Speed Survey) Process
In California the use of Speed Surveys is defined by the California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) and the methodology process defined by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“MUTCD”).
Speed Surveys are currently established using the 85th percentile method defined within the MUTCD and involves taking an indiscriminate sample data set during normal traffic conditions to Page | 2
calculate the 85th percentile speed of the roadway and then setting the speed limit to the closest 5- mph increment of the calculated 85th percentile speed. A further 5 mph reduction is permitted based on roadway conditions and constraints. The CVC further clarifies that if a valid speed survey is not available or if a speed limit is set below that practice that a speed trap is established (CVC 40802) limiting the use of radar enforcement on that roadway segment.
For example, a roadway segment with a measured 85th percentile speed of 37 mph would be rounded down to have a recommended speed limit of 35 mph. A 5-mph reduction to 30 mph is permitted based on geometric constraints such as horizontal or vertical curves that limit roadway visibility or non-visible constraints such as the roadway serving as a suggested route to school resulting on the roadway being a portion of an identified bicycle network resulting in a higherthan-normal pedestrian or bicycle activity. If this same roadway segment were signed at 25 mph it would be considered a “speed trap” and radar enforcement not permitted.
California Assembly Bill 43 - Traffic Safety (AB 43) signed into law by Governor Newsom on October 8, 2021, removes the current speed trap limitation by allowing local agencies to set speed limits based on policy direction. If a local agency, after completing an E&TS finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, the local agency is allowed to further reduce the speed limit by 5 mph if the portion of the roadway has been designated as a safety corridor or if it is adjacent to a land or facility that generates a high concentration of bicyclists and pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. A safety corridor is defined by the MUTCD as a roadway segment with an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur and as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generations are present within 1320 feet (1/4 mile).
Salinas Engineering & Traffic Surveys
After conducting speed surveys, staff recommends retention of the current speed limit for seventeen (17) segments, application of AB 43 to one segment, and reduction of the current speed limit for two segments.
Staff measured the 85th percentile speed on Linwood Drive at 34 mph. Following the standard speed survey procedure, a rounding to the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed and a 5-mph reduction would result in a speed limit of 30 mph. Given that Linwood Drive is adjacent to El Gabilan Elementary School with a high density of children, an additional 5-mph reduction is recommended in accordance with AB 43. See Table 1: 2025 Engineering & Traffic Survey (Speed Survey) Study Findings.
Page | 3
Table 1: 2025 Engineering & Traffic Survey (Speed Survey) Study Findings Street Segment Speed Survey Study Limits
Posted Speed Limit AB43 Study
Methodology
Existing Proposed Used
Abbott Street South Sanborn Road to Harkins Road 40 40 - Airport Boulevard Skyway Boulevard to Hansen Street 45 40 - Casentini Street* North Main Street to Rico Street 35 30 - Constitution Boulevard Independence Boulevard to East
Boronda Road 40 40 -
Romie Lane Riker Street to Abbott Street 30 30 -
Natividad Road East Laurel Drive to East Bernal Drive 40 40 - Linwood Drive* East Laurel Drive to East Alvin Drive 25 25 X San Juan Grade Road North Main Street to Russell Road 45 45 - Navajo Drive Adams Street to North Main Street 25 25 -
Villa Street West Market Street to Central Avenue 25 25 - Maple Street South Main Street to Abbott Street 25 25 - Clay Street Iverson Street to South Main Street 25 25 - Lincoln Avenue West Market Street to Clay Street 25 25 - Salinas Street West Market Street to Clay Street 25 25 - Pajaro Street East Market Street to East Blanco Road 25 25 - Hebbron Avenue East Market Street to John Street 25 25 - Tyler Street East Laurel Drive to Iris Drive 25 25 -
Los Palos Drive San Miguel Avenue to Abbott Street 25 25 - East Rossi Street* North Main Street to Sherwood Drive 25 25 - Blue highlighted are segments where speed limit reductions are proposed. * Existing speed traps.
Why not keep the existing speed limit signs arbitrarily low to slow the speed of traffic? Under California law, arbitrarily posting slower speed limit signs is not permitted and results in speed traps that limit the use of radar enforcement by law enforcement which in turn may result in higher vehicle speeds. Following implementation of AB 43, allows for further speed reductions following additional study to determine if vulnerable roadway users may benefit from the establishment of safety corridors by the City Council.
Traffic and Transportation Commission
The recommendation for the establishment of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits was presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission at its July 10, 2025, meeting.
The Commission voted (7-0) to recommend City Council approve a Resolution to establish the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits.
Page | 4
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The establishment of legitimate speed limits support the City Council's goal of “Public Safety”.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The Public Works Department surveys, recommends, and monitors posted speed limits.
Established speed zones allow the Salinas Police Department to enforce posted speed limits. Public Works provides the Police Department and the Traffic Court with updates and changes to the established speed limits for proper enforcement.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
The City must replace existing speed limit signage on two (2) changing roadway segments.
Additionally, some modifications to existing speed limit signs will need to be made. The estimated labor and material cost to replace, install, and relocate signs is approximately $8,500. Sufficient funding is available and appropriated in CIP 9162.
Fund Appropriation Appropriation
Name
Total
Appropriation
Amount for
recommendation
FY 25-256
Operating
Budget Page
Last Budget
Action (Date,
Resolution)
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Page | 5
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Attachment 1: 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report Attachment 2: FHWA Functional Classification Maps
Attachment 3: Speed Limit Informational Brochure
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE 2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR
SPEED LIMITS
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358, local municipalities have the power to increase or decrease prima facie speed limits for local streets; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 40802 and provisions of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Engineering and Traffic Surveys must be performed on those local streets every five to seven years when the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects are utilized to enforce the prima facie speed limits for those streets; and WHEREAS, existing law defines a speed trap and prohibits evidence of a driver’s speed obtained through a speed trap from being admissible in court in any prosecution against a driver for a speed-related offense; and
WHEREAS, existing law deems a road where the speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted within the previous 5 to 7 years to be a speed trap, unless the roadway has been evaluated by a registered engineer in which case the speed limit remains enforceable for a period of 14 years. Existing law exempts a school zone from certain provisions relating to defining a speed trap; and
WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2024, the State of California, through Assembly Bill 43, granted local jurisdictions the authority to retain or reduce speed limits a maximum of 5 mph below the current posted speed limit without creating a speed trap following an Engineering and Traffic Survey evaluated by a registered engineer; and
WHEREAS, the results of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code; and WHEREAS, City staff has concluded those speed limits set forth in the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits attached hereto are justified for their associated street segments in that they are found to be most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and are reasonable and safe for those street segments; and WHEREAS, at its July 10, 2025, meeting, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted (7-0) to recommend to City Council the establishment of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits; and
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the establishment of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1). The proposed action has no potential 2 to cause any effect on the environment and does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves the establishment of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City staff is hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the establishment of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits to fully effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of August 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 200 Lincoln Ave • Salinas, California 93901 (831) 758-7241 • (831) 758-7935 (Fax) •www.cityofsalinas.org 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey
For Speed Limits
Technical Report
PREPARED BY:
City of Salinas
Public Works Department
Traffic and Transportation Division
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, CA 93901
CERTIFICATION
I, Adriana Robles, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Salinas was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am experienced in performing surveys of this type and duly registered in the State of California as professional Civil Engineer.
Adriana Robles, PE, CFM
City Engineer
INTRODUCTION:
The 2025 Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) in the City of Salinas fulfills California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358, which require local agencies to follow certain procedures established by the State of California. The E&TS are intended to serve as the basis for establishing and enforcing the speed limits for specific streets in the City. The work herein by the City Traffic and Transportation Engineering Division staff, in accordance with the California CVC Section 40802, reviews the established speed limit sections to determine whether changes in existing conditions have occurred which may require adjusting the posted speed limit.
Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802 of the CVC and the national Uniform Vehicle Code. E&TS may be extended to every seven (7) years if the arresting officer has completed device training and the device has been recently calibrated. E&TS may be extended every fourteen (14) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or surrounding land uses have occurred as specified in the CVC. An E&TS should be conducted on new roadways or where traffic conditions have changed significantly.
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), as required under CVC 21400, defines standards for posting speed limits that rely upon collecting speed data in the field to determine the 85th percentile speed, which is subsequently rounded upward or downward to the nearest 5 mile per hour increment. The CA-MUTCD allows for options to further reduce the speed limit. Additionally, local authorities are allowed to further reduce speed limits to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrians under Assembly Bill No. 43. Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary summarizes the findings and recommendations for speed limits on those segments. The results of the E&TS will be valid until 2030, see Table 1 for details, unless extended through additional criteria.
METHODOLOGY:
On January 1, 2012, CVC 21400(b) became effective requiring the California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to revise the CA-MUTCD so that speed limits are based on field-collected speed data. A spot speed survey that typically consists of measuring vehicle speeds with an electronic device, most commonly a radar speed detector. Traffic traveling at free-flow speeds in each direction for a two-way street is collected and compiled to create a data set. The most significant data point collected is the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of motor vehicles travel. The 85th percentile speed is the industry standard data point which typically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. The reason that speed limit areas are established and posted is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of a reckless or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other laws, speed limits are established based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive a section of roadway as to what speed is reasonable and safe.
As specified in the California MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” Additionally, the MUTCD allows the posted speed limit to be lowered by no more than 5 mph from a rounded speed, using one of two options that depend on whether the 85th percentile speed has been rounded down or up. The options may be applied as follows:
1. MUTCD Section 2B.13 states, “The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.” The cited CVC Section 627 defines an E&T survey that is required to consider prevailing speeds, accident records, and conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and optionally consider residential density as well as pedestrian and bicycle safety. According to the MUTCD, this option requires documentation of an E&T Survey that “shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.” The basis for a speed limit that is more than 5 mph lower than the 85th percentile speed is something other than prevailing speeds. In regard to conditions not readily apparent to the driver, CVC 22358 states that “physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.”
2. MUTCD Section 2B.13 12a also states “For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5-mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.” An Option 2 round-down, which became available when CVC Section 21400(b) went into effect January 1, 2012, requires no E&T Survey to post the speed limit sign. The E&T Survey is required nevertheless, however, to allow radar or similar devices to be used for enforcement.
Neither the Vehicle Code nor the MUTCD provide much specific guidance regarding accident data or pedestrian or bicycle safety. In contrast, CVC 627(c)(1) provides specific guidance on residential density. Many residential neighborhoods in Salinas meet the density threshold of 16 separate dwelling houses or business structures per quarter mile. The statute does not apply to roads within a business district.
While the California MUTCD allows two options for lowering the posted speed, it has no provision for raising the speed limit above the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey for nineteen (19) roadway sections are listed in Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary:
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS EXPIRING 2030:
Decreased
5) Airport Boulevard between Skyway Boulevard and Hansen Street - This segment of Airport Boulevard is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes industrial and business use. Speed data collected on April 23, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 39 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 30 mph to 39 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, the existing speed limit of 45 mph should be reduced to 40 mph. 20) Casentini Street between North Main Street and Rico Street - This segment of Casentini Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential and commercial areas. Casentini Street was presented to the Salinas City Council on January 10, 2023, as part of the 2022 Engineering and Traffic Surveys where through Resolution No. 22555, Council rejected retaining the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph. City staff resurveyed the segment of Casentini Street on April 18, 2025, and recorded an 85th percentile speed of 36 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 26 mph to 35 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be changed to establish 30 mph.
Unchanged
3) Abbott Street between South Sanborn Road/East Blanco Road and Harkins Road - This segment of Abbott Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes industrial use. Speed data collected on April 22, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 42 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 31 mph to 40 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph should be retained. 27) Constitution Boulevard between Independence Boulevard and East Boronda Road - This segment of Constitution Boulevard is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes backing residential homes, retail, and park use. Speed data collected on April 8, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 46 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 36 mph to 45 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph should be retained. 45) Romie Lane between Riker Street and Abbott Street - This segment of East Romie Lane is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential homes, retail, office, hospital, and park use. Speed data collected on April 22, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 35 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 26 mph to 35 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be retained.
47) Natividad Road between East Laurel Drive and East Bernal Drive - This segment of Natividad Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting and backing residential homes and commercial businesses. Speed data collected on May 28, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 39 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to 37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph should be retained.
55) Linwood Drive between East Laurel Drive and East Alvin Drive - This segment of Linwood Drive is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and a school.
Linwood Drive was presented to the Salinas City Council on January 10, 2023, as part of the 2022 Engineering and Traffic Surveys where through Resolution No. 22555, Council rejected an increase in the existing posted speed limit from 25 mph to 30 mph. City staff resurveyed the segment of Linwood Drive on April 23, 2025, and recorded an 85th percentile speed of 34 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 27 mph to 36 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range.
Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, and following the implementation of Assembly Bill No. 43, authorizing local authority to further reduce speed limits by 5-mph if the roadway is adjacent to high concentration of bicyclists and pedestrians, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be established.
63) San Juan Grade Road between North Main Street and Russell Road - This segment of San Juan Grade Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes backing and fronting residential homes, retail, office, and agricultural use. Speed data collected on April 8, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 49 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 37 mph to 46 mph and suggests that the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 45 mph should be retained. 109) Navajo Drive between Adams Street and North Main Street - This segment of Navajo Drive is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and retail use.
Speed data collected on April 18, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 23 mph to 32 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speed rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
110) Villa Street between West Market Street and Central Avenue - This segment of Villa Street is classified as a collector street in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, a park, and a school. Speed data collected on May 20, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 18 mph to 27 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
111) Maple Street between South Main Street and Abbott Street - This segment of Maple Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, parks, and a school. Speed data collected on April 23, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 18 mph to 27 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
112) Clay Street between Iverson Drive and South Main Street - This segment of Clay Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, parks, offices, and a school. Speed data collected on April 28, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 29 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 20 mph to 29 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
113) Lincoln Avenue between West Market Street and Clay Street - This segment of Lincoln Avenue is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes office, residential, and commercial use. Speed data collected on May 6, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 29 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 20 mph to 29 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
114) Salinas Street between West Market Street and Clay Street - This segment of Salinas Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes business use. Speed data collected on April 25, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 22 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 15 mph to 24 mph and suggests the 10 mph pace is within this range. More than 50% of the property contiguous to one side of Salinas Street is occupied by businesses, meeting the criteria of a business district as defined in Section 235 of the CVC. Section 22352 of the CVC sets the prima facie speed limit for business districts of 25 mph. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and Section 22352 of the CVC, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. 116) Pajaro Street between East Market Street and East Blanco Road - This segment of Pajaro Street is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and office use. Speed data collected on April 25, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 23 mph to 32 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. 117) Hebbron Avenue between East Market Street and John Street - This segment of Hebbron Avenue is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and office areas. Speed data collected on June 4, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 28 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 20 mph to 29 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
118) Tyler Street between West Laurel Drive and Iris Drive - This segment of Tyler Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes. Speed data collected April 28, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 19 mph to 28 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. 121) Los Palos Drive between San Miguel Avenue and Abbott Street - This segment of Los Palos Drive is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential homes, hospital, office, and park use. Speed data collected on April 25, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 28 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 17 mph to 26 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
129) East Rossi Street between North Main Street and Sherwood Drive - This segment of East Rossi Street is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential and industrial use.
East Rossi Street was presented to the Salinas City Council on January 10, 2023, as part of the 2022 Engineering and Traffic Surveys where through Resolution No. 22555, Council rejected an increase in the existing posted speed limit from 25 mph to 30 mph. City staff resurveyed the segment of East Rossi Street on May 12, 2025, and recorded an 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be established.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Engineering and Traffic Surveys contained in Appendix A of this report are intended to establish and justify posted speed limits that can be enforced by radar. The posted speed limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of speeds considered reasonable for a particular section of highway for prevailing conditions. The posted speed limits are not absolute maximums, but rather prima facie speed limits for which violations would be cited under the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350 of the CVC). CVC 22350 states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe, having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit merely suggests a safe speed under normal conditions.
Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
No. Street Segment
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th-Percentile Speed (mph) MUTCD
Applied
Reduction
Option
Survey
Measured Rounded Expiration Recommended
3 Abbott Street South Sanborn Road/East Blanco Road to
Harkins Road 40 42 40 40 1 04/22/2030
5 Airport Boulevard Skyway Boulevard to Hansen Street 45 39 40 40 2 04/23/2030 20 Casentini Street North Main Street to Rico Street 351 36 35 30 1 04/18/2030 27 Constitution Boulevard Independence Boulevard to East Boronda Road 40 46 45 40 1 04/08/2030 45 Romie Lane Riker Street to Abbott Street 30 35 - 30 1 04/22/2030 47 Natividad Road East Laurel Drive to East Bernal Drive 40 39 40 40 - 05/28/2030 55 Linwood Drive East Laurel Drive to East Alvin Drive 252 34 35 25 2 04/23/2030 63 San Juan Grade Road North Main Street to Russell Road 45 49 50 45 2 04/08/2030 109 Navajo Drive Adams Street to North Main Street 25 31 30 25 1 04/18/2030 110 Villa Street West Market Street to Central Avenue 25 26 25 25 - 05/20/2030 111 Maple Street South Main Street to Abbott Street 25 26 25 25 - 04/23/2030 112 Clay Street Iverson Street to South Main Street 25 29 30 25 2 04/28/2030 113 Lincoln Avenue West Market Street to Clay Street 25 29 30 25 2 05/06/2030 114 Salinas Street West Market Street to Clay Street 25 22 25 25 - 04/25/2030 116 Pajaro Street East Market Street to East Blanco Road 25 31 30 25 1 04/25/2030 117 Hebbron Avenue East Market Street to John Street 25 28 30 25 2 06/04/2030 118 Tyler Street East Laurel Drive to Iris Drive 25 26 25 25 - 04/28/2030 121 Los Palos Drive San Miguel Avenue to Abbott Street 25 28 30 25 2 04/22/2030 129 East Rossi Street North Main Street to Sherwood Drive 25 31 30 25 1 05/12/2030
1 Not valid posted speed limit.
2AB43 applied.
COLLISION HISTORY
The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available collision information for each of the street segments.
The collision information was obtained from the City of Salinas from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. For this analysis, only collisions during the 2-year period between January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023 were considered. The collisions were reviewed and only corridor related collisions, those not related to signalized intersections, were summarized for each segment. Based on the number of total collisions studied over the 2-year period and average daily traffic (ADT) counts, a collision rate was calculated for each segment. The collision rates for each segment were compared to the statewide average rate listed in the 2022 Collision Data on California State Highways, to provide a general comparison of the collision rates on the segments to expected collisions rates for similar types of roadways, shown in Table 2: Collision Rate Summary.
Lane Type Total Statewide Urban Collision Rate
(2020, 2021, 2022)
(Total per million vehicle miles)
2 and 3 lane 1.07
4+ lanes (undivided) 1.33
4+ lanes (divided) 0.99
Table 2: Collision Rate Summary
No. Street Segment Existing Facility Length
(mi) AADT
Collisions
(2 years)
(2022-2023)
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
Statewide
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
3 Abbott Street South Sanborn Road/East Blanco Road to
Harkins Road 4+ lanes (undivided) 0.57 22,599 4 0.43 1.33 5 Airport Boulevard Skyway Boulevard to Hansen Street 4+ lanes (undivided) 1.13 10,757 6 0.67 1.33 20 Casentini Street North Main Street to Rico Street 2 and 3 lane 0.44 4,419 6 4.23 1.07 27 Constitution Boulevard Independence Boulevard to East Boronda Road 4+ lanes (divided) 1.19 10,572 14 1.52 0.99
45 East Romie Lane Riker Street to Abbott Street 2 and 3 lane 1.41 8,168 3 0.36 1.07 47 Natividad Road East Laurel Drive to East Bernal Drive 4+ lanes (undivided) 0.47 37,082 9 0.71 1.33 55 Linwood Drive East Laurel Drive East Alvin Drive 2 and 3 lane 0.62 5,739 10 3.88 1.07 63 San Juan Grade Road North Main Street to Rusell Road 4+ lanes (divided) 1.22 7,400 8 1.21 0.99 109 Navajo Drive Adams Street to North Main Street 2 and 3 lane 0.65 1,511 4 5.58 1.07 110 Villa Street West Market Street to Central Avenue 2 and 3 lane 0.45 2,362 1 1.29 1.07 111 Maple Street South Main Street to Abbott Street 2 and 3 lane 0.60 1,381 10 16.53 1.07 112 Clay Street Iverson Street to South Main Street 2 and 3 lane 0.44 4,294 12 8.70 1.07 113 Lincoln Avenue West Market Street to Clay Street 2 and 3 lane 0.54 6,573 5 1.93 1.07 114 Salinas Street West Market Street to Clay Street 2 and 3 lane 0.50 7,853 10 3.41 1.07 116 Pajaro Street East Market Street to East Blanco Road 2 and 3 lane 1.69 6,598 30 3.69 1.07 117 Hebbron Avenue East Market Street to John Street 2 and 3 lane 0.46 4,988 3 1.79 1.07 118 Tyler Street East Laurel Drive to Iris Drive 2 and 3 lane 0.34 2,394 4 6.73 1.07 121 Los Palos Drive San Miguel Avenue to Abbott Street 2 and 3 lane 0.55 2,981 4 3.34 1.07 129 East Rossi Street North Main Street to Sherwood Drive 2 and 3 lane 0.22 12,121 1 0.51 1.07
APPENDIX A
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,000 Feet Flat 110 Feet 4-Lane Major Arterial22,599 (2024)4 Collisions (2022-2023)0.43 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 40 MPH 42 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: ABBOTT STREET S SANBORN RD/E BLANCO RD & HARKINS RD 04/22/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 3 This segment of Abbott Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes industrial use. Speed data collected on April 22, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 42 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 31 mph to 40 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP ABBOTT ST
S SANBORN RD HARKINS RD
MERRILL ST GROWERS ST
I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Abbott St btwn Sanborn_Blanco & Harkins 03.dwg REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL E BLANCO RD NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES
Direction: WBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 1 2.00% 2.00%
23 0 0.00% 2.00%
24 1 2.00% 4.00%
25 2 4.00% 8.00% 27 To: 36 MPH
26 0 0.00% 8.00%
27 4 8.00% 16.00%
28 3 6.00% 22.00% MPH
29 3 6.00% 28.00% MPH
30 3 6.00% 34.00% MPH
31 2 4.00% 38.00% MPH
32 2 4.00% 42.00%
33 2 4.00% 46.00%
34 4 8.00% 54.00%
35 3 6.00% 60.00%
36 2 4.00% 64.00%
37 2 4.00% 68.00%
38 1 2.00% 70.00%
39 3 6.00% 76.00%
40 4 8.00% 84.00%
41 1 2.00% 86.00%
42 5 10.00% 96.00%
43 2 4.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.8 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Alejando M.
Abott Street Comments:
12:37
Tuesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
28 34
Vehicles in Pace:
01:03
Sanborn Road and Harkins Road
1131 Abott Street
04/22/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
5.8 0.6758
56.0%
42 41
Standard Deviation:
No. 3
42 33.9
33.79 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: EBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
19 1 2.00% 2.00%
20 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 2.00%
22 0 0.00% 2.00%
23 0 0.00% 2.00%
24 0 0.00% 2.00%
25 1 2.00% 4.00% 31 To: 40 MPH
26 0 0.00% 4.00%
27 1 2.00% 6.00%
28 1 2.00% 8.00% MPH
29 2 4.00% 12.00% MPH
30 1 2.00% 14.00% MPH
31 5 10.00% 24.00% MPH
32 2 4.00% 28.00%
33 1 2.00% 30.00%
34 5 10.00% 40.00%
35 1 2.00% 42.00%
36 1 2.00% 44.00%
37 2 4.00% 48.00%
38 3 6.00% 54.00%
39 1 2.00% 56.00%
40 5 10.00% 66.00%
41 3 6.00% 72.00%
42 2 4.00% 76.00%
43 1 2.00% 78.00%
44 3 6.00% 84.00%
45 1 2.00% 86.00%
46 1 2.00% 88.00%
47 2 4.00% 92.00%
48 1 2.00% 94.00%
49 1 2.00% 96.00%
50 0 0.00% 96.00%
51 0 0.00% 96.00%
52 0 0.00% 96.00%
53 0 0.00% 96.00%
54 0 0.00% 96.00%
55 1 2.00% 98.00%
56 0 0.00% 98.00%
57 0 0.00% 98.00%
58 0 0.00% 98.00%
59 0 0.00% 98.00%
60 0 0.00% 98.00%
61 0 0.00% 98.00%
62 0 0.00% 98.00%
63 1 2.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 45
90th Percentile Speed: 47
Vehicles in Pace: 26
50th Percentile Speed: 38
95th Percentile Speed: 49
Standard Error of the Mean: 1.1
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 52.0%
Standard Deviation: 7.9
Variance of the Mean: 1.2386
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 37.8
Sample Variance: 61.93
12:37 01:03
No. 3
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejando M.
Between: Sanborn Road and Harkins Road
Survey Location: 1131 Abott Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/22/25 Tuesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Abott Street
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: WBD/EBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
19 1 1.00% 1.00%
20 0 0.00% 1.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 1.00%
22 1 1.00% 2.00%
23 0 0.00% 2.00%
24 1 1.00% 3.00%
25 3 3.00% 6.00% 31 To: 40 MPH
26 0 0.00% 6.00%
27 5 5.00% 11.00%
28 4 4.00% 15.00% MPH
29 5 5.00% 20.00% MPH
30 4 4.00% 24.00% MPH
31 7 7.00% 31.00% MPH
32 4 4.00% 35.00%
33 3 3.00% 38.00%
34 9 9.00% 47.00%
35 4 4.00% 51.00%
36 3 3.00% 54.00%
37 4 4.00% 58.00%
38 4 4.00% 62.00%
39 4 4.00% 66.00%
40 9 9.00% 75.00%
41 4 4.00% 79.00%
42 7 7.00% 86.00%
43 3 3.00% 89.00%
44 3 3.00% 92.00%
45 1 1.00% 93.00%
46 1 1.00% 94.00%
47 2 2.00% 96.00%
48 1 1.00% 97.00%
49 1 1.00% 98.00%
50 0 0.00% 98.00%
51 0 0.00% 98.00%
52 0 0.00% 98.00%
53 0 0.00% 98.00%
54 0 0.00% 98.00%
55 1 1.00% 99.00%
56 0 0.00% 99.00%
57 0 0.00% 99.00%
58 0 0.00% 99.00%
59 0 0.00% 99.00%
60 0 0.00% 99.00%
61 0 0.00% 99.00%
62 0 0.00% 99.00%
63 1 1.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 47
Abott Street
85th Percentile Speed: 42
90th Percentile Speed: 44
Vehicles in Pace: 51
50th Percentile Speed: 35
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.7
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 51.0%
Standard Deviation: 7.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.5114
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 35.9
Sample Variance: 51.14
Street: Comments:
Between: Sanborn Road and Harkins Road
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejando M.
No. 3
Survey Location: 1131 Abott Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/22/25 Tuesday
12:37 01:03
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 6,000 Feet Flat 64 Feet 4-Lane Minor Arterial 10,757 (2024)6 Collisions (2022-2023)0.67 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 40 MPH 39 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: AIRPORT BOULEVARD SKYWAY BLVD & HANSEN ST 04/23/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 5 DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP This segment of Airport Boulevard is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes industrial and business park use. Speed data collected on April 23, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 39 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 30 mph to 39 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, the existing speed limit of 45 mph should be reduced to 40 mph.
I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Airport Blvd btwn Skyway & Hansen 05.dwg AIRPORT BLVD MOFFETT STROY DIAZ ST HANSEN ST
SKYWAY BLVD
HWY 101 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT REGISTEREDPROFES IONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: WBD
45 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00%
28 0 0.00% 0.00%
29 5 10.00% 10.00%
30 9 18.00% 28.00%
31 2 4.00% 32.00%
32 5 10.00% 42.00%
33 2 4.00% 46.00%
34 2 4.00% 50.00%
35 6 12.00% 62.00%
36 5 10.00% 72.00%
37 7 14.00% 86.00%
38 2 4.00% 90.00%
39 2 4.00% 94.00%
40 3 6.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Sean L. & Eva H.
Airport Boulevard Comments:
03:36
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
43 34
Vehicles in Pace:
03:52
Skyway Boulevard & Hansen Street
Airport Blvd & Mercer Wy
04/23/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.5 0.2398
86.0%
40 37
Standard Deviation:
No. 5
38 33.9
11.99 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: EBD
45 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 33 To: 42 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00%
28 0 0.00% 0.00%
29 0 0.00% 0.00%
30 2 4.00% 4.00%
31 2 4.00% 8.00%
32 3 6.00% 14.00%
33 4 8.00% 22.00%
34 2 4.00% 26.00%
35 7 14.00% 40.00%
36 1 2.00% 42.00%
37 7 14.00% 56.00%
38 6 12.00% 68.00%
39 5 10.00% 78.00%
40 3 6.00% 84.00%
41 3 6.00% 90.00%
42 5 10.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 41
90th Percentile Speed: 41
Vehicles in Pace: 43
50th Percentile Speed: 37
95th Percentile Speed: 42
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 86.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.4
Variance of the Mean: 0.2354
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 36.7
Sample Variance: 11.77
03:36 03:52
No. 5
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
Between: Skyway Boulevard & Hansen Street
Survey Location: Airport Blvd & Mercer Wy
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/23/25 Wednesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Airport Boulevard
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: WBD/EBD
45 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 30 To: 39 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00%
28 0 0.00% 0.00%
29 5 5.00% 5.00%
30 11 11.00% 16.00%
31 4 4.00% 20.00%
32 8 8.00% 28.00%
33 6 6.00% 34.00%
34 4 4.00% 38.00%
35 13 13.00% 51.00%
36 6 6.00% 57.00%
37 14 14.00% 71.00%
38 8 8.00% 79.00%
39 7 7.00% 86.00%
40 6 6.00% 92.00%
41 3 3.00% 95.00%
42 5 5.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 41
Airport Boulevard
85th Percentile Speed: 39
90th Percentile Speed: 40
Vehicles in Pace: 81
50th Percentile Speed: 35
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 81.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.7
Variance of the Mean: 0.1374
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 35.3
Sample Variance: 13.74
Street: Comments:
Between: Skyway Boulevard & Hansen Street
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
No. 5
Survey Location: E/O Rider Avenue
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/23/25 Wednesday
03:36 03:52
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,350 Feet Flat 44 Feet 2-Lane Collector 4,419 (2025)6 Collisions (2022-2023)4.23 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH 36 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: CASENTINI STREET N MAIN ST & RICO ST 04/18/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 20 This segment of Casentini Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential and commercial areas. Speed data collected April 18, 2025 revealed a 85th percentile of 36 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 26 mph to 35 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph. DESCRIPTION SPEED SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK ALL-WAY STOP I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Casentini St btwn N Main & Rico 20.dwg STOP n main st rico st casentini st REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: WBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 27 To: 36 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 2 4.00% 4.00%
27 1 2.00% 6.00%
28 1 2.00% 8.00%
29 5 10.00% 18.00%
30 3 6.00% 24.00%
31 5 10.00% 34.00%
32 6 12.00% 46.00%
33 7 14.00% 60.00%
34 5 10.00% 70.00%
35 4 8.00% 78.00%
36 4 8.00% 86.00%
37 1 2.00% 88.00%
38 1 2.00% 90.00%
39 2 4.00% 94.00%
40 2 4.00% 98.00%
41 1 2.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.6 0.2546
82.0%
40 36
Standard Deviation:
No. 20
38 33.0
12.73 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
41 33
Vehicles in Pace:
04:00
N Main St & Rico St
303 Casentini St
04/18/25
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Sean L. & Eva H.
Casentini St Comments:
03:33
Friday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: EBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 26 To: 35 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 6 12.00% 12.00%
27 1 2.00% 14.00%
28 2 4.00% 18.00%
29 5 10.00% 28.00%
30 4 8.00% 36.00%
31 7 14.00% 50.00%
32 5 10.00% 60.00%
33 7 14.00% 74.00%
34 2 4.00% 78.00%
35 5 10.00% 88.00%
36 4 8.00% 96.00%
37 1 2.00% 98.00%
38 1 2.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Street: Casentini St Comments:
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
Between: N Main St & Rico St
Survey Location: 303 Casentini St
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/18/25 Friday
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 31.5
Sample Variance: 10.46
03:33 04:00
No. 20
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 88.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.2092
85th Percentile Speed: 35
90th Percentile Speed: 36
Vehicles in Pace: 44
50th Percentile Speed: 31
95th Percentile Speed: 36
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: WBD/EBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 26 To: 35 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 8 8.00% 8.00%
27 2 2.00% 10.00%
28 3 3.00% 13.00%
29 10 10.00% 23.00%
30 7 7.00% 30.00%
31 12 12.00% 42.00%
32 11 11.00% 53.00%
33 14 14.00% 67.00%
34 7 7.00% 74.00%
35 9 9.00% 83.00%
36 8 8.00% 91.00%
37 2 2.00% 93.00%
38 2 2.00% 95.00%
39 2 2.00% 97.00%
40 2 2.00% 99.00%
41 1 1.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
No. 20
Survey Location: 303 Casentini St
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/18/25 Friday
03:33 04:00
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 32.2
Sample Variance: 12.03
Street: Comments:
Between: N Main St & Rico St
Weather: Sunny
95th Percentile Speed: 38
Casentini St
85th Percentile Speed: 36
90th Percentile Speed: 36
Vehicles in Pace: 83
50th Percentile Speed: 32
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 83.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.1203
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 6,300 Feet Flat 87 Feet 4-Lane Minor Arterial 10,572 (2024)14 Collisions (2022-2023)1.52 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 40 MPH 46 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: CONSTITUTION BOULEVARD INDEPENDENCE BLVD & BORONDA RD 04/08/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 27 This segment of Constitution Boulevard is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes backing residential homes, retail, and park use. Speed data collected on April 8, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 46 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 36 mph to 45 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Constitution Blvd btwn Independence & Boronda 27.dwg CONSTITUTION BLVD INDEPENDENCE BLVD BEACON HILL DR BEACON HILL DR E BORONDA RD CAPE COD WY BUNKER HILL WY NANTUCKET BLVD REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
30 0 0.00% 0.00%
31 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
32 1 2.00% 4.00%
33 2 4.00% 8.00%
34 3 6.00% 14.00%
35 3 6.00% 20.00%
36 2 4.00% 24.00% 35 To: 44 MPH
37 3 6.00% 30.00%
38 4 8.00% 38.00%
39 5 10.00% 48.00% MPH
40 3 6.00% 54.00% MPH
41 1 2.00% 56.00% MPH
42 3 6.00% 62.00% MPH
43 2 4.00% 66.00%
44 4 8.00% 74.00%
45 2 4.00% 78.00%
46 2 4.00% 82.00%
47 1 2.00% 84.00%
48 3 6.00% 90.00%
49 0 0.00% 90.00%
50 1 2.00% 92.00%
51 2 4.00% 96.00%
52 1 2.00% 98.00%
53 1 2.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
5.7 0.6442
60.0%
51 48
Standard Deviation:
No. 27
48 40.9
32.21 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
30 40
Vehicles in Pace:
02:19
Independence Boulevard and Boronda Road
Constitution Boulevard @ Las Casitas Drive
04/08/25
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.8 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Alejandro M.
Constitution Boulevard Comments:
01:43
Tuesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
30 1 2.00% 2.00%
31 1 2.00% 4.00% MPH
32 1 2.00% 6.00%
33 1 2.00% 8.00%
34 2 4.00% 12.00%
35 1 2.00% 14.00%
36 2 4.00% 18.00% 36 To: 45 MPH
37 1 2.00% 20.00%
38 1 2.00% 22.00%
39 5 10.00% 32.00% MPH
40 5 10.00% 42.00% MPH
41 5 10.00% 52.00% MPH
42 5 10.00% 62.00% MPH
43 2 4.00% 66.00%
44 6 12.00% 78.00%
45 4 8.00% 86.00%
46 1 2.00% 88.00%
47 2 4.00% 92.00%
48 0 0.00% 92.00%
49 1 2.00% 94.00%
50 0 0.00% 94.00%
51 1 2.00% 96.00%
52 1 2.00% 98.00%
53 0 0.00% 98.00%
54 0 0.00% 98.00%
55 0 0.00% 98.00%
56 0 0.00% 98.00%
57 0 0.00% 98.00%
58 0 0.00% 98.00%
59 1 2.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Street: Constitution Boulevard Comments:
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejandro M.
Between: Independence Boulevard and Boronda Road
Survey Location: Constitution Boulevard @ Las Casitas Drive Speed Limit:
Date: 04/08/25 Tuesday
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 41.3
Sample Variance: 29.21
01:43 02:19
No. 27
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.8
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 72.0%
Standard Deviation: 5.4
Variance of the Mean: 0.5842
85th Percentile Speed: 45
90th Percentile Speed: 47
Vehicles in Pace: 36
50th Percentile Speed: 41
95th Percentile Speed: 51
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
30 1 1.00% 1.00%
31 2 2.00% 3.00% MPH
32 2 2.00% 5.00%
33 3 3.00% 8.00%
34 5 5.00% 13.00%
35 4 4.00% 17.00%
36 4 4.00% 21.00% 36 To: 45 MPH
37 4 4.00% 25.00%
38 5 5.00% 30.00%
39 10 10.00% 40.00% MPH
40 8 8.00% 48.00% MPH
41 6 6.00% 54.00% MPH
42 8 8.00% 62.00% MPH
43 4 4.00% 66.00%
44 10 10.00% 76.00%
45 6 6.00% 82.00%
46 3 3.00% 85.00%
47 3 3.00% 88.00%
48 3 3.00% 91.00%
49 1 1.00% 92.00%
50 1 1.00% 93.00%
51 3 3.00% 96.00%
52 2 2.00% 98.00%
53 1 1.00% 99.00%
54 0 0.00% 99.00%
55 0 0.00% 99.00%
56 0 0.00% 99.00%
57 0 0.00% 99.00%
58 0 0.00% 99.00%
59 1 1.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Alejandro M.
No. 27
Survey Location: Constitution Boulevard @ Las Casitas Drive Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/08/25 Tuesday
01:43 02:19
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 41.1
Sample Variance: 30.45
Street: Comments:
Between: Independence Boulevard and Boronda Road
Weather: Clear
95th Percentile Speed: 51
Constitution Boulevard
85th Percentile Speed: 46
90th Percentile Speed: 48
Vehicles in Pace: 65
50th Percentile Speed: 41
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 65.0%
Standard Deviation: 5.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.3045
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 7,450 Feet Flat Varies (46 to 62 Feet) 4-Lane Minor Arterial 8,168 (2023)3 Collisions (2022-2023)0.36 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH 35 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: ROMIE LANE RIKER ST & ABBOTT ST 04/22/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 45 This segment of Romie Lane is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential homes, retail, office, hospital, and park use. Speed data collected on April 22, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 35 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 26 mph to 35 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Romie Ln btwn Riker & Abbott 45.dwg E ROMIE LN ABBOTT ST
RIKER ST
S MAIN ST
PAJARO ST
CALIFORNIA ST
ALAMEDA AVE
WILGART WY
LOS PALOS DR REGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: WBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
21 1 2.00% 2.00%
22 2 4.00% 6.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 8.00%
24 0 0.00% 8.00%
25 3 6.00% 14.00%
26 5 10.00% 24.00%
27 1 2.00% 26.00% 25 To: 34 MPH
28 3 6.00% 32.00%
29 4 8.00% 40.00%
30 6 12.00% 52.00% MPH
31 1 2.00% 54.00% MPH
32 4 8.00% 62.00% MPH
33 7 14.00% 76.00% MPH
34 2 4.00% 80.00%
35 3 6.00% 86.00%
36 3 6.00% 92.00%
37 1 2.00% 94.00%
38 0 0.00% 94.00%
39 1 2.00% 96.00%
40 0 0.00% 96.00%
41 0 0.00% 96.00%
42 1 2.00% 98.00%
43 0 0.00% 98.00%
44 0 0.00% 98.00%
45 1 2.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.7 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Alejando M.
E Romie Lane Comments:
01:13
Tuesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
36 30
Vehicles in Pace:
01:38
Riker Street and Abott Street
242 E Romie Lane
04/22/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
5.0 0.4934
72.0%
39 35
Standard Deviation:
No. 45
36 30.7
24.67 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: EBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
23 2 4.00% 6.00%
24 1 2.00% 8.00%
25 0 0.00% 8.00%
26 2 4.00% 12.00%
27 1 2.00% 14.00% 26 To: 35 MPH
28 6 12.00% 26.00%
29 3 6.00% 32.00%
30 7 14.00% 46.00% MPH
31 6 12.00% 58.00% MPH
32 5 10.00% 68.00% MPH
33 3 6.00% 74.00% MPH
34 3 6.00% 80.00%
35 4 8.00% 88.00%
36 1 2.00% 90.00%
37 1 2.00% 92.00%
38 1 2.00% 94.00%
39 1 2.00% 96.00%
40 1 2.00% 98.00%
41 0 0.00% 98.00%
42 0 0.00% 98.00%
43 1 2.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 35
90th Percentile Speed: 36
Vehicles in Pace: 40
50th Percentile Speed: 31
95th Percentile Speed: 39
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 80.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.3
Variance of the Mean: 0.3686
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 31.1
Sample Variance: 18.43
01:13 01:38
No. 45
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejando M.
Between: Riker Street and Abott Street
Survey Location: 242 E Romie Lane
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/22/25 Tuesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
E Romie Lane
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: WBD/EBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
21 1 1.00% 1.00%
22 3 3.00% 4.00% MPH
23 3 3.00% 7.00%
24 1 1.00% 8.00%
25 3 3.00% 11.00%
26 7 7.00% 18.00%
27 2 2.00% 20.00% 26 To: 35 MPH
28 9 9.00% 29.00%
29 7 7.00% 36.00%
30 13 13.00% 49.00% MPH
31 7 7.00% 56.00% MPH
32 9 9.00% 65.00% MPH
33 10 10.00% 75.00% MPH
34 5 5.00% 80.00%
35 7 7.00% 87.00%
36 4 4.00% 91.00%
37 2 2.00% 93.00%
38 1 1.00% 94.00%
39 2 2.00% 96.00%
40 1 1.00% 97.00%
41 0 0.00% 97.00%
42 1 1.00% 98.00%
43 1 1.00% 99.00%
44 0 0.00% 99.00%
45 1 1.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 39
E Romie Lane
85th Percentile Speed: 35
90th Percentile Speed: 36
Vehicles in Pace: 76
50th Percentile Speed: 31
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 76.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.2138
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 30.9
Sample Variance: 21.38
Street: Comments:
Between: Riker Street and Abott Street
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejando M.
No. 45
Survey Location: 242 E Romie Lane
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/22/25 Tuesday
01:13 01:38
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,450 Feet Flat Varies (50 to 88 Feet)4-Lane Major Arterial37,082 (2025)9 Collisions (2022-2023)0.72 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 40 MPH 39 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: NATIVIDAD ROAD E LAUREL DR & E BERNAL DR 05/28/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 47 This segment of Natividad Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting and backing residential homes and commercial businesses. Speed data collected on May 28, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 39 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to 37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK ALL-WAY STOP I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Natividad Rd btwn Laurel & Bernal 47.dwg STOP NATIVIDAD RD E BERNAL DR
SORRENTINI DR E LAUREL DR
SHERWOOD DR REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 31 To: 40 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00%
28 1 2.00% 2.00%
29 0 0.00% 2.00%
30 2 4.00% 6.00%
31 5 10.00% 16.00%
32 4 8.00% 24.00%
33 5 10.00% 34.00%
34 1 2.00% 36.00%
35 6 12.00% 48.00%
36 5 10.00% 58.00%
37 4 8.00% 66.00%
38 2 4.00% 70.00%
39 2 4.00% 74.00%
40 5 10.00% 84.00%
41 2 4.00% 88.00%
42 2 4.00% 92.00%
43 0 0.00% 92.00%
44 1 2.00% 94.00%
45 2 4.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 1 2.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
4.4 0.3908
78.0%
45 41
Standard Deviation:
No. 47
42 36.2
19.54 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
39 36
Vehicles in Pace:
02:28
E Bernal Dr & E Laurel Dr
1 Lunsford Dr
05/28/25
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Cloudy
0.6 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C
Natividad Road Comments:
01:55
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 1 2.00% 2.00%
25 1 2.00% 4.00%
26 0 0.00% 4.00%
27 1 2.00% 6.00%
28 3 6.00% 12.00%
29 5 10.00% 22.00%
30 4 8.00% 30.00%
31 2 4.00% 34.00%
32 5 10.00% 44.00%
33 5 10.00% 54.00%
34 6 12.00% 66.00%
35 4 8.00% 74.00%
36 6 12.00% 86.00%
37 3 6.00% 92.00%
38 2 4.00% 96.00%
39 1 2.00% 98.00%
40 1 2.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Street: Natividad Road Comments:
Weather: Cloudy
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
Between: E Bernal Dr & E Laurel Dr
Survey Location: 1 Lunsford Dr
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/28/25 Wednesday
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 32.8
Sample Variance: 13.08
01:55 02:28
No. 47
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 86.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.2616
85th Percentile Speed: 36
90th Percentile Speed: 37
Vehicles in Pace: 43
50th Percentile Speed: 33
95th Percentile Speed: 38
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
40 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 1 1.00% 1.00%
25 1 1.00% 2.00%
26 0 0.00% 2.00%
27 1 1.00% 3.00%
28 4 4.00% 7.00%
29 5 5.00% 12.00%
30 6 6.00% 18.00%
31 7 7.00% 25.00%
32 9 9.00% 34.00%
33 10 10.00% 44.00%
34 7 7.00% 51.00%
35 10 10.00% 61.00%
36 11 11.00% 72.00%
37 7 7.00% 79.00%
38 4 4.00% 83.00%
39 3 3.00% 86.00%
40 6 6.00% 92.00%
41 2 2.00% 94.00%
42 2 2.00% 96.00%
43 0 0.00% 96.00%
44 1 1.00% 97.00%
45 2 2.00% 99.00%
46 0 0.00% 99.00%
47 1 1.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
No. 47
Survey Location: 1 Lunsford Dr
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 05/28/25 Wednesday
01:55 02:28
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 34.5
Sample Variance: 19.10
Street: Comments:
Between: E Bernal Dr & E Laurel Dr
Weather: Cloudy
95th Percentile Speed: 42
Natividad Road
85th Percentile Speed: 39
90th Percentile Speed: 40
Vehicles in Pace: 76
50th Percentile Speed: 34
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 76.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.4
Variance of the Mean: 0.1910
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,250 Feet Flat Varies (43 to 63 Feet) 2-Lane Collector 5,739 (2025)10 Collisions (2022-2023)3.88 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 34 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: LINWOOD DRIVE E LAUREL DR & E ALVIN DR 04/23/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 55 This segment of Linwood Drive is classified as collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and a school. Speed data collected April 23, 2025 revealed the 85th percentile speed of 34 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 27 mph to 36 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, and following the implementation of Assembly Bill No. 43, authorizing local authority to further reduce speed limits by 5 mph if the roadway is adjacent to high concentration of bicyclists and pedestrians, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be established. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK ALL-WAY STOP I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Linwood Dr btwn Laurel & Alvin 55.dwg STOP LINWOOD DR 15 MPH SCHOOL ZONE 15 MPH SCHOOL ZONE
CHAPARRAL ST
E LAUREL DR
E ALVIN DR
VALLEJO ST
CABRILLO AVE
ELWOOD DR
RAINIER DR PIKE WY EL GABILAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SEQUOIA ST
REATA ST REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 27 To: 36 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 2.00%
24 3 6.00% 8.00%
25 1 2.00% 10.00%
26 1 2.00% 12.00%
27 7 14.00% 26.00%
28 9 18.00% 44.00%
29 2 4.00% 48.00%
30 6 12.00% 60.00%
31 5 10.00% 70.00%
32 4 8.00% 78.00%
33 2 4.00% 82.00%
34 3 6.00% 88.00%
35 2 4.00% 92.00%
36 4 8.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Sean L. & Eva H.
Linwood Drive Comments:
04:16
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
44 30
Vehicles in Pace:
04:32
E. Laurel Drive & E. Alvin Drive
1434 Linwood Drive
04/23/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.4 0.2360
88.0%
36 34
Standard Deviation:
No. 55
35 29.8
11.80 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 25 To: 34 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 3 6.00% 6.00%
25 5 10.00% 16.00%
26 2 4.00% 20.00%
27 2 4.00% 24.00%
28 9 18.00% 42.00%
29 4 8.00% 50.00%
30 4 8.00% 58.00%
31 6 12.00% 70.00%
32 3 6.00% 76.00%
33 2 4.00% 80.00%
34 4 8.00% 88.00%
35 4 8.00% 96.00%
36 2 4.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 34
90th Percentile Speed: 35
Vehicles in Pace: 41
50th Percentile Speed: 29
95th Percentile Speed: 35
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 82.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.2414
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 29.7
Sample Variance: 12.07
04:16 04:32
No. 55
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
Between: E. Laurel Drive & E. Alvin Drive
Survey Location: 1434 Linwood Drive
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/23/25 Wednesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Linwood Drive
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 27 To: 36 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 1 1.00% 1.00%
24 6 6.00% 7.00%
25 6 6.00% 13.00%
26 3 3.00% 16.00%
27 9 9.00% 25.00%
28 18 18.00% 43.00%
29 6 6.00% 49.00%
30 10 10.00% 59.00%
31 11 11.00% 70.00%
32 7 7.00% 77.00%
33 4 4.00% 81.00%
34 7 7.00% 88.00%
35 6 6.00% 94.00%
36 6 6.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 36
Linwood Drive
85th Percentile Speed: 34
90th Percentile Speed: 35
Vehicles in Pace: 84
50th Percentile Speed: 30
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 84.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.4
Variance of the Mean: 0.1182
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 29.8
Sample Variance: 11.82
Street: Comments:
Between: E. Laurel Drive & E. Alvin Drive
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
No. 55
Survey Location: 1434 Linwood Drive
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/23/25 Wednesday
04:16 04:32
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 6,450 Feet Flat Varies (40 to 80 Feet)2/4-Lane Major Arterial7,400 (2024)8 Collisions (2022-2023)1.21 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 45 MPH 49 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: SAN JUAN GRADE ROAD N MAIN ST & RUSSELL RD 04/08/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 63 This segment of San Juan Grade Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes backing and fronting residential homes, retail, office, and agricultural use. Speed data collected on April 8, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 49 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 37 mph to 46 mph and suggests that the 85th percentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 45 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK ALL-WAY STOP I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\San Juan Grade Rd btwn N Main & Russell 63.dwg STOP N MAIN ST SAN JUAN GRADE RD RUSSELL RD E BORONDA RD VAN BUREN AVE REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
45 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
30 0 0.00% 0.00%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
32 1 2.00% 2.00%
33 0 0.00% 2.00%
34 0 0.00% 2.00%
35 1 2.00% 4.00%
36 3 6.00% 10.00% 38 To: 47 MPH
37 1 2.00% 12.00%
38 4 8.00% 20.00%
39 0 0.00% 20.00% MPH
40 2 4.00% 24.00% MPH
41 1 2.00% 26.00% MPH
42 3 6.00% 32.00% MPH
43 5 10.00% 42.00%
44 5 10.00% 52.00%
45 2 4.00% 56.00%
46 6 12.00% 68.00%
47 2 4.00% 72.00%
48 2 4.00% 76.00%
49 2 4.00% 80.00%
50 2 4.00% 84.00%
51 1 2.00% 86.00%
52 2 4.00% 90.00%
53 1 2.00% 92.00%
54 1 2.00% 94.00%
55 1 2.00% 96.00%
56 1 2.00% 98.00%
57 0 0.00% 98.00%
58 0 0.00% 98.00%
59 0 0.00% 98.00%
60 0 0.00% 98.00%
61 0 0.00% 98.00%
62 0 0.00% 98.00%
63 0 0.00% 98.00%
64 0 0.00% 98.00%
65 0 0.00% 98.00%
66 0 0.00% 98.00%
67 0 0.00% 98.00%
68 0 0.00% 98.00%
69 0 0.00% 98.00%
70 1 2.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.9 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Alejandro M.
San Juan Grade Road Comments:
02:52
Tuesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
30 44
Vehicles in Pace:
03:27
N. Main Street and Russel Road
San Juan Grade @ Van Buren Ave
04/08/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
6.6 0.8686
60.0%
55 51
Standard Deviation:
No. 63
52 44.9
43.43 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
45 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
30 1 2.00% 2.00%
31 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
32 0 0.00% 2.00%
33 0 0.00% 2.00%
34 1 2.00% 4.00%
35 1 2.00% 6.00%
36 1 2.00% 8.00% 37 To: 46 MPH
37 3 6.00% 14.00%
38 1 2.00% 16.00%
39 5 10.00% 26.00% MPH
40 2 4.00% 30.00% MPH
41 2 4.00% 34.00% MPH
42 1 2.00% 36.00% MPH
43 6 12.00% 48.00%
44 6 12.00% 60.00%
45 2 4.00% 64.00%
46 5 10.00% 74.00%
47 0 0.00% 74.00%
48 4 8.00% 82.00%
49 4 8.00% 90.00%
50 1 2.00% 92.00%
51 0 0.00% 92.00%
52 2 4.00% 96.00%
53 0 0.00% 96.00%
54 1 2.00% 98.00%
55 0 0.00% 98.00%
56 0 0.00% 98.00%
57 0 0.00% 98.00%
58 0 0.00% 98.00%
59 0 0.00% 98.00%
60 1 2.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 49
90th Percentile Speed: 49
Vehicles in Pace: 33
50th Percentile Speed: 44
95th Percentile Speed: 52
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.8
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 66.0%
Standard Deviation: 5.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.6154
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 43.6
Sample Variance: 30.77
02:52 03:27
No. 63
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejandro M.
Between: N. Main Street and Russel Road
Survey Location: San Juan Grade @ Van Buren Ave
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/08/25 Tuesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
San Juan Grade Road
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
45 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
30 1 1.00% 1.00%
31 0 0.00% 1.00% MPH
32 1 1.00% 2.00%
33 0 0.00% 2.00%
34 1 1.00% 3.00%
35 2 2.00% 5.00%
36 4 4.00% 9.00% 37 To: 46 MPH
37 4 4.00% 13.00%
38 5 5.00% 18.00%
39 5 5.00% 23.00% MPH
40 4 4.00% 27.00% MPH
41 3 3.00% 30.00% MPH
42 4 4.00% 34.00% MPH
43 11 11.00% 45.00%
44 11 11.00% 56.00%
45 4 4.00% 60.00%
46 11 11.00% 71.00%
47 2 2.00% 73.00%
48 6 6.00% 79.00%
49 6 6.00% 85.00%
50 3 3.00% 88.00%
51 1 1.00% 89.00%
52 4 4.00% 93.00%
53 1 1.00% 94.00%
54 2 2.00% 96.00%
55 1 1.00% 97.00%
56 1 1.00% 98.00%
57 0 0.00% 98.00%
58 0 0.00% 98.00%
59 0 0.00% 98.00%
60 1 1.00% 99.00%
61 0 0.00% 99.00%
62 0 0.00% 99.00%
63 0 0.00% 99.00%
64 0 0.00% 99.00%
65 0 0.00% 99.00%
66 0 0.00% 99.00%
67 0 0.00% 99.00%
68 0 0.00% 99.00%
69 0 0.00% 99.00%
70 1 1.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 54
San Juan Grade Road
85th Percentile Speed: 49
90th Percentile Speed: 52
Vehicles in Pace: 62
50th Percentile Speed: 44
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 62.0%
Standard Deviation: 6.1
Variance of the Mean: 0.3711
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 44.2
Sample Variance: 37.11
Street: Comments:
Between: N. Main Street and Russel Road
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejandro M.
No. 63
Survey Location: San Juan Grade @ Van Buren Ave
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/08/25 Tuesday
02:52 03:27
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,400 Feet Flat Varies (34 to 40 Feet) 2-Lane Collector 1,511 (2024)4 Collisions (2022-2023)5.58 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 31 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: NAVAJO DRIVE ADAMS ST & N MAIN ST 04/18/2025 (EXPIRES 2030) 109 This segment of Navajo Drive is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and retail use. Speed data collected on April 18, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 23 mph to 32 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speed rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK ALL-WAY STOP I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Navajo Dr btwn Adams and N Main 109.dwg STOP NAVAJO DR ADAMS ST N 1ST ST N MAIN ST MOHAWK AVE W CURTIS ST BOEING AVE REGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 22 To: 31 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 2 4.00% 4.00% MPH
22 3 6.00% 10.00% MPH
23 4 8.00% 18.00%
24 5 10.00% 28.00%
25 6 12.00% 40.00%
26 3 6.00% 46.00%
27 3 6.00% 52.00%
28 6 12.00% 64.00%
29 6 12.00% 76.00%
30 3 6.00% 82.00%
31 5 10.00% 92.00%
32 2 4.00% 96.00%
33 2 4.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.3 0.2210
88.0%
32 31
Standard Deviation:
No. 109
31 26.9
11.05 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
44 27
Vehicles in Pace:
04:48
Adams Street & N Main Street
N First Street btwn Mohawk Avenue
04/18/25
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Sean L. & Eva H.
Navajo Drive Comments:
04:00
Friday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 To: 32 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 6 12.00% 12.00%
24 5 10.00% 22.00%
25 4 8.00% 30.00%
26 5 10.00% 40.00%
27 5 10.00% 50.00%
28 6 12.00% 62.00%
29 7 14.00% 76.00%
30 2 4.00% 80.00%
31 5 10.00% 90.00%
32 2 4.00% 94.00%
33 3 6.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Street: Navajo Drive Comments:
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
Between: Adams Street & N Main Street
Survey Location: N First Street btwn Mohawk Avenue
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/18/25 Friday
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.4
Sample Variance: 9.03
04:00 04:48
No. 109
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 94.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.0
Variance of the Mean: 0.1806
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 31
Vehicles in Pace: 47
50th Percentile Speed: 27
95th Percentile Speed: 33
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: WBD/EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 To: 32 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 2 2.00% 2.00% MPH
22 3 3.00% 5.00% MPH
23 10 10.00% 15.00%
24 10 10.00% 25.00%
25 10 10.00% 35.00%
26 8 8.00% 43.00%
27 8 8.00% 51.00%
28 12 12.00% 63.00%
29 13 13.00% 76.00%
30 5 5.00% 81.00%
31 10 10.00% 91.00%
32 4 4.00% 95.00%
33 5 5.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
No. 109
Survey Location: N First Street btwn Mohawk Avenue
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/18/25 Friday
04:00 04:48
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.2
Sample Variance: 10.01
Street: Comments:
Between: Adams Street & N Main Street
Weather: Sunny
95th Percentile Speed: 32
Navajo Drive
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 31
Vehicles in Pace: 90
50th Percentile Speed: 27
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 90.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.1001
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,400 Feet Flat 34 Feet 2-Lane Collector 2,362 (2025)1 Collision (2022-2023)1.29 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 26 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: VILLA STREET W MARKET ST & CENTRAL AVE 05/20/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 110 This segment of Villa Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, park, and a school. Speed data collected on May 20, 2025 revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 18 mph to 27 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Villa St btwn Market & Central 110.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP VILLA ST W MARKET ST CENTRAL AVEPARK ST ARCHER ST WILSON ST REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 18 To: 27 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 7 14.00% 14.00%
19 7 14.00% 28.00% MPH
20 8 16.00% 44.00% MPH
21 5 10.00% 54.00% MPH
22 5 10.00% 64.00% MPH
23 2 4.00% 68.00%
24 5 10.00% 78.00%
25 4 8.00% 86.00%
26 2 4.00% 90.00%
27 2 4.00% 94.00%
28 1 2.00% 96.00%
29 0 0.00% 96.00%
30 1 2.00% 98.00%
31 0 0.00% 98.00%
32 0 0.00% 98.00%
33 0 0.00% 98.00%
34 0 0.00% 98.00%
35 0 0.00% 98.00%
36 1 2.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C
Villa Street Comments:
11:13
Tuesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
47 21
Vehicles in Pace:
01:02
Central Avenue & W Market Street
46 Villa Street
05/20/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.6 0.2644
94.0%
28 25
Standard Deviation:
No. 110
26 22.0
13.22 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 19 To: 28 MPH
17 2 4.00% 4.00%
18 2 4.00% 8.00%
19 2 4.00% 12.00% MPH
20 4 8.00% 20.00% MPH
21 4 8.00% 28.00% MPH
22 5 10.00% 38.00% MPH
23 5 10.00% 48.00%
24 7 14.00% 62.00%
25 4 8.00% 70.00%
26 6 12.00% 82.00%
27 4 8.00% 90.00%
28 3 6.00% 96.00%
29 1 2.00% 98.00%
30 0 0.00% 98.00%
31 1 2.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 27
90th Percentile Speed: 27
Vehicles in Pace: 44
50th Percentile Speed: 24
95th Percentile Speed: 28
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 88.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.2108
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 23.5
Sample Variance: 10.54
11:13 01:02
No. 110
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
Between: Central Avenue & W Market Street
Survey Location: 46 Villa Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/20/25 Tuesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Villa Street
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 18 To: 27 MPH
17 2 2.00% 2.00%
18 9 9.00% 11.00%
19 9 9.00% 20.00% MPH
20 12 12.00% 32.00% MPH
21 9 9.00% 41.00% MPH
22 10 10.00% 51.00% MPH
23 7 7.00% 58.00%
24 12 12.00% 70.00%
25 8 8.00% 78.00%
26 8 8.00% 86.00%
27 6 6.00% 92.00%
28 4 4.00% 96.00%
29 1 1.00% 97.00%
30 1 1.00% 98.00%
31 1 1.00% 99.00%
32 0 0.00% 99.00%
33 0 0.00% 99.00%
34 0 0.00% 99.00%
35 0 0.00% 99.00%
36 1 1.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 28
Villa Street
85th Percentile Speed: 26
90th Percentile Speed: 27
Vehicles in Pace: 90
50th Percentile Speed: 22
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 90.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.1230
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 22.7
Sample Variance: 12.30
Street: Comments:
Between: Central Avenue & W Market Street
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
No. 110
Survey Location: 46 Villa Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 05/20/25 Tuesday
11:13 01:02
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,200 Feet Flat 46 Feet 2-Lane Collector 1,381(2025)10 Collisions (2022-2023)16.37 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 26 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: MAPLE STREET S MAIN ST & ABBOTT ST 04/23/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 111 This segment of Maple Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, parks, and school use. Speed data collected on April 23, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 18 mph to 27 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Maple St btwn Main & Abbott 111.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP MAPLE ST
S MAIN ST
PAJARO ST
CALIFORNIA ST
FRONT ST
CARMEL AVE
ABBOTT ST 15 MPH SCHOOL ZONE 15 MPH SCHOOL ZONE REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
16 1 2.00% 2.00%
17 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
18 3 6.00% 8.00%
19 5 10.00% 18.00%
20 8 16.00% 34.00%
21 3 6.00% 40.00%
22 3 6.00% 46.00% 18 To: 27 MPH
23 5 10.00% 56.00%
24 5 10.00% 66.00%
25 4 8.00% 74.00% MPH
26 4 8.00% 82.00% MPH
27 4 8.00% 90.00% MPH
28 3 6.00% 96.00% MPH
29 1 2.00% 98.00%
30 0 0.00% 98.00%
31 1 2.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C.
Maple Street Comments:
01:35
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
44 23
Vehicles in Pace:
02:31
S. Main Street and Abott Street
245 Maple Street
04/23/2025
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.5 0.2394
88.0%
28 27
Standard Deviation:
No. 111
27 22.9
11.97 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
16 2 4.00% 4.00%
17 1 2.00% 6.00% MPH
18 1 2.00% 8.00%
19 4 8.00% 16.00%
20 7 14.00% 30.00%
21 4 8.00% 38.00%
22 6 12.00% 50.00% 16 To: 25 MPH
23 8 16.00% 66.00%
24 4 8.00% 74.00%
25 7 14.00% 88.00% MPH
26 2 4.00% 92.00% MPH
27 1 2.00% 94.00% MPH
28 1 2.00% 96.00% MPH
29 0 0.00% 96.00%
30 1 2.00% 98.00%
31 0 0.00% 98.00%
32 1 2.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 25
90th Percentile Speed: 26
Vehicles in Pace: 44
50th Percentile Speed: 22
95th Percentile Speed: 28
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 88.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.2100
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 22.5
Sample Variance: 10.50
01:35 02:31
No. 111
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo C.
Between: S. Main Street and Abott Street
Survey Location: 245 Maple Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/23/2025 Wednesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Maple Street
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: WBD/EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
16 3 3.00% 3.00%
17 1 1.00% 4.00% MPH
18 4 4.00% 8.00%
19 9 9.00% 17.00%
20 15 15.00% 32.00%
21 7 7.00% 39.00%
22 9 9.00% 48.00% 18 To: 27 MPH
23 13 13.00% 61.00%
24 9 9.00% 70.00%
25 11 11.00% 81.00% MPH
26 6 6.00% 87.00% MPH
27 5 5.00% 92.00% MPH
28 4 4.00% 96.00% MPH
29 1 1.00% 97.00%
30 1 1.00% 98.00%
31 1 1.00% 99.00%
32 1 1.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 28
Maple Street
85th Percentile Speed: 26
90th Percentile Speed: 27
Vehicles in Pace: 88
50th Percentile Speed: 23
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 88.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.3
Variance of the Mean: 0.1117
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 22.7
Sample Variance: 11.17
Street: Comments:
Between: S. Main Street and Abott Street
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo C.
No. 111
Survey Location: 245 Maple Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/23/2025 Wednesday
01:35 02:31
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP STOP STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,350 Feet Flat Varies (34 to 58 Feet) 2-Lane Collector 4,294 (2025)12 Collisions (2022-2023)8.70 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 29 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: CLAY STREET IVERSON ST & MAIN ST 04/28/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 112 This segment of Clay Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes, parks, offices, and a school. Speed data collected on April 28, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 29 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 20 mph to 29 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Clay St btwn Iverson & Main 112.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP CLAY ST
CAPITOL ST
CAYUGA ST
CHURCH ST
WEST ST
RIKER ST
IVERSON ST
LINCOLN AVE SALINAS ST
S MAIN ST
HOMESTEAD AVE REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
18 1 2.00% 2.00%
19 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
20 3 6.00% 8.00%
21 1 2.00% 10.00%
22 5 10.00% 20.00%
23 5 10.00% 30.00%
24 7 14.00% 44.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
25 5 10.00% 54.00%
26 5 10.00% 64.00%
27 5 10.00% 74.00% MPH
28 5 10.00% 84.00% MPH
29 4 8.00% 92.00% MPH
30 1 2.00% 94.00% MPH
31 0 0.00% 94.00%
32 2 4.00% 98.00%
33 0 0.00% 98.00%
34 1 2.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C.
Clay Street Comments:
11:19
Monday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
45 25
Vehicles in Pace:
12:05
Iris Steet and S Main Street
165 Clay Street
04/28/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.3 0.2224
90.0%
32 29
Standard Deviation:
No. 112
29 25.3
11.12 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
18 2 4.00% 4.00%
19 1 2.00% 6.00% MPH
20 2 4.00% 10.00%
21 1 2.00% 12.00%
22 5 10.00% 22.00%
23 5 10.00% 32.00%
24 4 8.00% 40.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
25 7 14.00% 54.00%
26 7 14.00% 68.00%
27 2 4.00% 72.00% MPH
28 5 10.00% 82.00% MPH
29 2 4.00% 86.00% MPH
30 2 4.00% 90.00% MPH
31 1 2.00% 92.00%
32 1 2.00% 94.00%
33 2 4.00% 98.00%
34 1 2.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 29
90th Percentile Speed: 30
Vehicles in Pace: 40
50th Percentile Speed: 25
95th Percentile Speed: 33
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 80.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.2848
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 25.4
Sample Variance: 14.24
11:19 12:05
No. 112
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo C.
Between: Iris Steet and S Main Street
Survey Location: 165 Clay Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/28/25 Monday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Clay Street
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: EBD/WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
18 3 3.00% 3.00%
19 1 1.00% 4.00% MPH
20 5 5.00% 9.00%
21 2 2.00% 11.00%
22 10 10.00% 21.00%
23 10 10.00% 31.00%
24 11 11.00% 42.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
25 12 12.00% 54.00%
26 12 12.00% 66.00%
27 7 7.00% 73.00% MPH
28 10 10.00% 83.00% MPH
29 6 6.00% 89.00% MPH
30 3 3.00% 92.00% MPH
31 1 1.00% 93.00%
32 3 3.00% 96.00%
33 2 2.00% 98.00%
34 2 2.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
60 0 0.00% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 32
Clay Street
85th Percentile Speed: 29
90th Percentile Speed: 30
Vehicles in Pace: 85
50th Percentile Speed: 25
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 85.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.1255
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 25.4
Sample Variance: 12.55
Street: Comments:
Between: Iris Steet and S Main Street
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo C.
No. 112
Survey Location: 165 Clay Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/28/25 Monday
11:19 12:05
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,850 Feet Flat Varies (34 to 79 Feet) 2-Lane Minor Arterial 6,573 (2025)5 Collisions (2022-2023)1.93 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 29 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: LINCOLN AVENUE W MARKET ST & CLAY ST 05/06/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 113 This segment of Lincoln Avenue is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes office, residential, and commercial use. Speed data collected on May 6, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 29 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 20 mph to 29 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Lincoln Ave btwn Market & Clay 113.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP LINCOLN AVE W MARKET ST
CLAY ST
CENTRAL AVE
W SAN LUIS ST
W ALISAL ST
W GABILAN ST
HOWARD ST REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 1 2.00% 2.00%
19 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
20 3 6.00% 8.00% MPH
21 1 2.00% 10.00% MPH
22 5 10.00% 20.00% MPH
23 5 10.00% 30.00%
24 7 14.00% 44.00%
25 5 10.00% 54.00%
26 5 10.00% 64.00%
27 5 10.00% 74.00%
28 5 10.00% 84.00%
29 4 8.00% 92.00%
30 1 2.00% 94.00%
31 0 0.00% 94.00%
32 2 4.00% 98.00%
33 0 0.00% 98.00%
34 1 2.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C.
Lincoln Avenue Comments:
11:55
Tuesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
45 25
Vehicles in Pace:
12:40
W Market Street and Clay Street
361 Lincoln Ave
05/06/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.3 0.2224
90.0%
32 29
Standard Deviation:
No. 113
29 25.3
11.12 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 2 4.00% 4.00%
19 1 2.00% 6.00% MPH
20 2 4.00% 10.00% MPH
21 1 2.00% 12.00% MPH
22 5 10.00% 22.00% MPH
23 5 10.00% 32.00%
24 4 8.00% 40.00%
25 7 14.00% 54.00%
26 7 14.00% 68.00%
27 2 4.00% 72.00%
28 5 10.00% 82.00%
29 2 4.00% 86.00%
30 2 4.00% 90.00%
31 1 2.00% 92.00%
32 1 2.00% 94.00%
33 2 4.00% 98.00%
34 1 2.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 29
90th Percentile Speed: 30
Vehicles in Pace: 40
50th Percentile Speed: 25
95th Percentile Speed: 33
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 80.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.2848
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 25.4
Sample Variance: 14.24
11:55 12:40
No. 113
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo C.
Between: W Market Street and Clay Street
Survey Location: 361 Lincoln Ave
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/06/25 Tuesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Lincoln Avenue
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 3 3.00% 3.00%
19 1 1.00% 4.00% MPH
20 5 5.00% 9.00% MPH
21 2 2.00% 11.00% MPH
22 10 10.00% 21.00% MPH
23 10 10.00% 31.00%
24 11 11.00% 42.00%
25 12 12.00% 54.00%
26 12 12.00% 66.00%
27 7 7.00% 73.00%
28 10 10.00% 83.00%
29 6 6.00% 89.00%
30 3 3.00% 92.00%
31 1 1.00% 93.00%
32 3 3.00% 96.00%
33 2 2.00% 98.00%
34 2 2.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 32
Lincoln Avenue
85th Percentile Speed: 29
90th Percentile Speed: 30
Vehicles in Pace: 85
50th Percentile Speed: 25
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 85.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.1255
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 25.4
Sample Variance: 12.55
Street: Comments:
Between: W Market Street and Clay Street
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo C.
No. 113
Survey Location: 361 Lincoln Ave
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 05/06/25 Tuesday
11:55 12:40
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,700 Feet Flat 42 Feet 3-Lane Major Arterial7,853 (2024)10 Collisions (2022-2023)3.41 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 22 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: SALINAS STREET W MARKET ST & CLAY ST 04/25/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 114 This segment of Salinas Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes mix and office use. Speed data was collected on April 25, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 22 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 15 mph to 24 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. More than 50% of the property contiguous to one side of Salinas Street is occupied by businesses, meeting the criteria of a business district as defined in Section 235 of the CVC. Section 22352 of the CVC sets the prima facie speed limit for business districts of 25 mph. Based on the surrounding land use, and the 10 mph pace range, and Section 22352 of the CVC, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Salinas St btwn Market & Clay 114.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP SALINAS ST W MARKET ST CLAY ST
CENTRAL AVE
W GABILAN ST
W SAN LUIS ST
W ALISAL ST
HOWARD ST
JOHN ST REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 2 4.00% 4.00%
15 4 8.00% 12.00%
16 8 16.00% 28.00% 14 To: 23 MPH
17 5 10.00% 38.00%
18 5 10.00% 48.00%
19 4 8.00% 56.00% MPH
20 11 22.00% 78.00% MPH
21 6 12.00% 90.00% MPH
22 2 4.00% 94.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 96.00%
24 2 4.00% 100.00%
25 0 0.00% 100.00%
26 0 0.00% 100.00%
27 0 0.00% 100.00%
28 0 0.00% 100.00%
29 0 0.00% 100.00%
30 0 0.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.4 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Sean L. & Eva H.
Salinas Street Comments:
03:57
Friday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
48 19
Vehicles in Pace:
04:37
West Market Street & Clay Street
Salinas Street & John Street
04/25/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
2.6 0.1308
96.0%
23 21
Standard Deviation:
No. 114
21 18.6
6.54 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 1 2.00% 2.00%
15 2 4.00% 6.00%
16 2 4.00% 10.00% 15 To: 24 MPH
17 2 4.00% 14.00%
18 5 10.00% 24.00%
19 5 10.00% 34.00% MPH
20 9 18.00% 52.00% MPH
21 7 14.00% 66.00% MPH
22 5 10.00% 76.00% MPH
23 8 16.00% 92.00%
24 3 6.00% 98.00%
25 1 2.00% 100.00%
26 0 0.00% 100.00%
27 0 0.00% 100.00%
28 0 0.00% 100.00%
29 0 0.00% 100.00%
30 0 0.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 23
90th Percentile Speed: 23
Vehicles in Pace: 48
50th Percentile Speed: 20
95th Percentile Speed: 24
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 96.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.1346
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 20.3
Sample Variance: 6.73
03:57 04:37
No. 114
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
Between: West Market Street & Clay Street
Survey Location: Salinas Street & John Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/25/25 Friday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Salinas Street
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 3 3.00% 3.00%
15 6 6.00% 9.00%
16 10 10.00% 19.00% 15 To: 24 MPH
17 7 7.00% 26.00%
18 10 10.00% 36.00%
19 9 9.00% 45.00% MPH
20 20 20.00% 65.00% MPH
21 13 13.00% 78.00% MPH
22 7 7.00% 85.00% MPH
23 9 9.00% 94.00%
24 5 5.00% 99.00%
25 1 1.00% 100.00%
26 0 0.00% 100.00%
27 0 0.00% 100.00%
28 0 0.00% 100.00%
29 0 0.00% 100.00%
30 0 0.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 24
Salinas Street
85th Percentile Speed: 22
90th Percentile Speed: 23
Vehicles in Pace: 96
50th Percentile Speed: 20
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 96.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.7
Variance of the Mean: 0.0729
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 19.4
Sample Variance: 7.29
Street: Comments:
Between: West Market Street & Clay Street
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
No. 114
Survey Location: Salinas Street & John Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/25/25 Friday
03:57 04:37
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 8,950 Feet Flat 48 Feet 2-Lane Minor Arterial 6,598 (2025)30 Collisions (2022-2023)3.67 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 31 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: PAJARO STREET E MARKET ST & E BLANCO RD 04/25/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 116 This segment of Pajaro Street is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and office use. Speed data collected on April 25, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 23 mph to 32 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Pajaro St btwn Market & Blanco 116.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP PAJARO ST
E BLANCO RD SAN MIGUEL AVE
KATHERINE AVE
E ROMIE LN
HAWTHORNE ST
E ACACIA ST
OAK ST
PINE ST
WILLOW ST
CHESTNUT ST
MAPLE ST
HARVEST ST
WINHAM ST
LA MESA DR
JOHN ST E SAN LUIS ST E ALISAL ST E GABILAN ST
W MARKET ST
SAN PEDRO ST REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 To: 32 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 7 14.00% 14.00%
24 2 4.00% 18.00%
25 7 14.00% 32.00%
26 10 20.00% 52.00%
27 6 12.00% 64.00%
28 4 8.00% 72.00%
29 4 8.00% 80.00%
30 1 2.00% 82.00%
31 3 6.00% 88.00%
32 2 4.00% 92.00%
33 4 8.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.4 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Sean L. & Eva H.
Pajaro Street Comments:
03:26
Friday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
46 26
Vehicles in Pace:
03:40
East Market Street & East Blanco Road
Pajaro Street & East Acacia Street
04/25/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.0 0.1792
92.0%
33 31
Standard Deviation:
No. 116
32 27.1
8.96 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 1 2.00% 2.00%
25 11 22.00% 24.00%
26 10 20.00% 44.00%
27 4 8.00% 52.00%
28 5 10.00% 62.00%
29 6 12.00% 74.00%
30 5 10.00% 84.00%
31 2 4.00% 88.00%
32 2 4.00% 92.00%
33 2 4.00% 96.00%
34 0 0.00% 96.00%
35 2 4.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 32
Vehicles in Pace: 48
50th Percentile Speed: 27
95th Percentile Speed: 33
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 96.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.1560
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.9
Sample Variance: 7.80
03:26 03:40
No. 116
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
Between: East Market Street & East Blanco Road
Survey Location: Pajaro Street & East Acacia Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/25/25 Friday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Pajaro Street
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 To: 32 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 7 7.00% 7.00%
24 3 3.00% 10.00%
25 18 18.00% 28.00%
26 20 20.00% 48.00%
27 10 10.00% 58.00%
28 9 9.00% 67.00%
29 10 10.00% 77.00%
30 6 6.00% 83.00%
31 5 5.00% 88.00%
32 4 4.00% 92.00%
33 6 6.00% 98.00%
34 0 0.00% 98.00%
35 2 2.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 33
Pajaro Street
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 32
Vehicles in Pace: 92
50th Percentile Speed: 27
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 92.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.9
Variance of the Mean: 0.0845
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.5
Sample Variance: 8.45
Street: Comments:
Between: East Market Street & East Blanco Road
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Sean L. & Eva H.
No. 116
Survey Location: Pajaro Street & East Acacia Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/25/25 Friday
03:26 03:40
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,450 Feet Flat Varies (36 to 42 Feet) 2-Lane Collector 4,988 (2025)3 Collisions (2022-2023)1.78 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 28 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: HEBBRON AVENUE E MARKET ST & JOHN ST 06/04/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 117 This segment of Hebbron Avenue is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes and office areas. Speed data collected on June 4, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 28 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 20 mph to 29 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Hebbron Ave btwn Market & John 117.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP S HEBBRON AVE N HEBBRON AVE
E ALISAL ST
E MARKET ST JOHN ST
JEFFERSON ST
EAST STPRINCE PL REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 1 2.00% 2.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
17 0 0.00% 2.00%
18 0 0.00% 2.00%
19 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
20 2 4.00% 6.00% MPH
21 4 8.00% 14.00% MPH
22 4 8.00% 22.00% MPH
23 6 12.00% 34.00%
24 7 14.00% 48.00%
25 5 10.00% 58.00%
26 8 16.00% 74.00%
27 7 14.00% 88.00%
28 1 2.00% 90.00%
29 1 2.00% 92.00%
30 2 4.00% 96.00%
31 1 2.00% 98.00%
32 0 0.00% 98.00%
33 0 0.00% 98.00%
34 0 0.00% 98.00%
35 0 0.00% 98.00%
36 0 0.00% 98.00%
37 0 0.00% 98.00%
38 0 0.00% 98.00%
39 0 0.00% 98.00%
40 0 0.00% 98.00%
41 0 0.00% 98.00%
42 1 2.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C
Hebbron Avenue Comments:
02:30
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
45 25
Vehicles in Pace:
03:23
East Market Street & John Street
700 North Hebbron Avenue
06/04/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.8 0.2848
90.0%
30 27
Standard Deviation:
No. 117
28 24.9
14.24 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 1 2.00% 2.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
17 2 4.00% 6.00%
18 2 4.00% 10.00%
19 2 4.00% 14.00% MPH
20 2 4.00% 18.00% MPH
21 4 8.00% 26.00% MPH
22 4 8.00% 34.00% MPH
23 2 4.00% 38.00%
24 5 10.00% 48.00%
25 6 12.00% 60.00%
26 3 6.00% 66.00%
27 6 12.00% 78.00%
28 3 6.00% 84.00%
29 5 10.00% 94.00%
30 0 0.00% 94.00%
31 0 0.00% 94.00%
32 2 4.00% 98.00%
33 1 2.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 29
90th Percentile Speed: 29
Vehicles in Pace: 40
50th Percentile Speed: 25
95th Percentile Speed: 32
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 80.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.1
Variance of the Mean: 0.3336
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 24.4
Sample Variance: 16.68
02:30 03:23
No. 117
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
Between: East Market Street & John Street
Survey Location: 700 North Hebbron Avenue
Speed Limit:
Date: 06/04/25 Wednesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Hebbron Avenue
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 2 2.00% 2.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
17 2 2.00% 4.00%
18 2 2.00% 6.00%
19 2 2.00% 8.00% MPH
20 4 4.00% 12.00% MPH
21 8 8.00% 20.00% MPH
22 8 8.00% 28.00% MPH
23 8 8.00% 36.00%
24 12 12.00% 48.00%
25 11 11.00% 59.00%
26 11 11.00% 70.00%
27 13 13.00% 83.00%
28 4 4.00% 87.00%
29 6 6.00% 93.00%
30 2 2.00% 95.00%
31 1 1.00% 96.00%
32 2 2.00% 98.00%
33 1 1.00% 99.00%
34 0 0.00% 99.00%
35 0 0.00% 99.00%
36 0 0.00% 99.00%
37 0 0.00% 99.00%
38 0 0.00% 99.00%
39 0 0.00% 99.00%
40 0 0.00% 99.00%
41 0 0.00% 99.00%
42 1 1.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 30
Hebbron Avenue
85th Percentile Speed: 28
90th Percentile Speed: 29
Vehicles in Pace: 85
50th Percentile Speed: 25
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 85.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.9
Variance of the Mean: 0.1538
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 24.6
Sample Variance: 15.38
Street: Comments:
Between: East Market Street & John Street
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
No. 117
Survey Location: 700 North Hebbron Avenue
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 06/04/25 Wednesday
02:30 03:23
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 1,800 Feet Flat 32 Feet 2-Lane Collector 2,394 (2025)4 Collisions (2022-2023)6.73 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 26 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: TYLER STREET W LAUREL DR & IRIS DR 04/28/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 118 This segment of Tyler Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surround land use includes fronting residential homes. Speed data collected April 28, 2025 revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 19 mph to 28 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Tyler St btwn Laurel & Iris 118.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP TYLER ST W LAUREL DR
IRIS DR
HARDING ST
POLK ST TYLER PL REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 2 4.00% 4.00% 16 To: 25 MPH
17 3 6.00% 10.00%
18 3 6.00% 16.00%
19 5 10.00% 26.00% MPH
20 6 12.00% 38.00% MPH
21 3 6.00% 44.00% MPH
22 4 8.00% 52.00% MPH
23 8 16.00% 68.00%
24 6 12.00% 80.00%
25 4 8.00% 88.00%
26 1 2.00% 90.00%
27 2 4.00% 94.00%
28 2 4.00% 98.00%
29 1 2.00% 100.00%
30 0 0.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.3 0.2130
88.0%
28 25
Standard Deviation:
No. 118
26 21.9
10.65 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
44 22
Vehicles in Pace:
02:34
Iris Drive & West Laurel Drive
1062 Tyler Street
04/28/25
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C
Tyler Street Comments:
01:42
Monday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 21 To: 30 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 2 4.00% 4.00% MPH
20 2 4.00% 8.00% MPH
21 5 10.00% 18.00% MPH
22 7 14.00% 32.00% MPH
23 5 10.00% 42.00%
24 9 18.00% 60.00%
25 5 10.00% 70.00%
26 5 10.00% 80.00%
27 1 2.00% 82.00%
28 2 4.00% 86.00%
29 3 6.00% 92.00%
30 3 6.00% 98.00%
31 0 0.00% 98.00%
32 0 0.00% 98.00%
33 1 2.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Street: Tyler Street Comments:
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
Between: Iris Drive & West Laurel Drive
Survey Location: 1062 Tyler Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/28/25 Monday
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 24.3
Sample Variance: 9.90
01:42 02:34
No. 118
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 90.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.1
Variance of the Mean: 0.1980
85th Percentile Speed: 28
90th Percentile Speed: 29
Vehicles in Pace: 45
50th Percentile Speed: 24
95th Percentile Speed: 30
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 2 2.00% 2.00% 19 To: 28 MPH
17 3 3.00% 5.00%
18 3 3.00% 8.00%
19 7 7.00% 15.00% MPH
20 8 8.00% 23.00% MPH
21 8 8.00% 31.00% MPH
22 11 11.00% 42.00% MPH
23 13 13.00% 55.00%
24 15 15.00% 70.00%
25 9 9.00% 79.00%
26 6 6.00% 85.00%
27 3 3.00% 88.00%
28 4 4.00% 92.00%
29 4 4.00% 96.00%
30 3 3.00% 99.00%
31 0 0.00% 99.00%
32 0 0.00% 99.00%
33 1 1.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
No. 118
Survey Location: 1062 Tyler Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/28/25 Monday
01:42 02:34
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 23.1
Sample Variance: 11.62
Street: Comments:
Between: Iris Drive & West Laurel Drive
Weather: Sunny
95th Percentile Speed: 29
Tyler Street
85th Percentile Speed: 26
90th Percentile Speed: 28
Vehicles in Pace: 84
50th Percentile Speed: 23
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 84.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.4
Variance of the Mean: 0.1162
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,900 Feet Flat 38 Feet 2-Lane Collector 2,981 (2024)4 Collisions (2022-2023)3.35 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 28 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: LOS PALOS DRIVE SAN MIGUEL AVE & ABBOTT ST 04/22/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 121 DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\Los Palos Dr btwn San Miguel & Abbott 121.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP
E ROMIE LN LOS PALOS DR
SAN MIGUEL AVE ABBOTT ST
SAN JOSE ST
MANOR DR
VIA PARAISO
FAIRMONT DR
This segment of Los Palos Drive is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential homes, hospital, office, and park use. Speed data collected on April 25, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 28 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 17 mph to 26 mph and suggests the 85thpercentile is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
14 1 2.00% 2.00%
15 4 8.00% 10.00% MPH
16 2 4.00% 14.00%
17 4 8.00% 22.00%
18 6 12.00% 34.00%
19 2 4.00% 38.00%
20 6 12.00% 50.00% 14 To: 23 MPH
21 3 6.00% 56.00%
22 8 16.00% 72.00%
23 1 2.00% 74.00% MPH
24 1 2.00% 76.00% MPH
25 3 6.00% 82.00% MPH
26 2 4.00% 86.00% MPH
27 0 0.00% 86.00%
28 1 2.00% 88.00%
29 1 2.00% 90.00%
30 2 4.00% 94.00%
31 0 0.00% 94.00%
32 3 6.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.7 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Alejando M.
Los Palos Drive Comments:
12:37
Tuesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
37 20
Vehicles in Pace:
01:03
San Miguel Avenue and Abott Street
1139 Los Palos Drive
04/22/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
4.8 0.4600
74.0%
32 26
Standard Deviation:
No. 121
29 21.3
23.00 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
14 1 2.00% 2.00%
15 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
16 0 0.00% 2.00%
17 2 4.00% 6.00%
18 0 0.00% 6.00%
19 0 0.00% 6.00%
20 4 8.00% 14.00% 20 To: 29 MPH
21 2 4.00% 18.00%
22 6 12.00% 30.00%
23 7 14.00% 44.00% MPH
24 4 8.00% 52.00% MPH
25 7 14.00% 66.00% MPH
26 3 6.00% 72.00% MPH
27 4 8.00% 80.00%
28 1 2.00% 82.00%
29 2 4.00% 86.00%
30 4 8.00% 94.00%
31 0 0.00% 94.00%
32 1 2.00% 96.00%
33 2 4.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 29
90th Percentile Speed: 30
Vehicles in Pace: 40
50th Percentile Speed: 24
95th Percentile Speed: 32
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 80.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.0
Variance of the Mean: 0.3226
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 24.5
Sample Variance: 16.13
01:49 02:50
No. 121
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo
Between: San Miguel Avenue and Abott Street
Survey Location: 925 Los Palos Drive
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/22/25 Tuesday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Los Palos Drive
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
14 2 2.00% 2.00%
15 4 4.00% 6.00% MPH
16 2 2.00% 8.00%
17 6 6.00% 14.00%
18 6 6.00% 20.00%
19 2 2.00% 22.00%
20 10 10.00% 32.00% 17 To: 26 MPH
21 5 5.00% 37.00%
22 14 14.00% 51.00%
23 8 8.00% 59.00% MPH
24 5 5.00% 64.00% MPH
25 10 10.00% 74.00% MPH
26 5 5.00% 79.00% MPH
27 4 4.00% 83.00%
28 2 2.00% 85.00%
29 3 3.00% 88.00%
30 6 6.00% 94.00%
31 0 0.00% 94.00%
32 4 4.00% 98.00%
33 2 2.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 32
Los Palos Drive
85th Percentile Speed: 28
90th Percentile Speed: 30
Vehicles in Pace: 71
50th Percentile Speed: 22
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 71.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.7
Variance of the Mean: 0.2189
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 22.9
Sample Variance: 21.89
Street: Comments:
Between: San Miguel Avenue and Abott Street
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejando M.
No. 121
Survey Location: 1139 Los Palos Drive and 925 Los Palos Drive Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 04/22/25 Tuesday
12:37 01:03
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 1,150 Feet Flat Varies (60 to 65 Feet) 3-Lane Minor Arterial 12,212 (2025)1 Collisions (2022-2023)0.51 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 31 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: EAST ROSSI STREET N MAIN ST & SHERWOOD DR 05/12/2025 (EXPIRES IN 2030) 129 This segment of East Rossi Street is classified as a minor arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential and industrial. Speed data collected on May 12, 2025, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2030\Aerials\E Rossi St btwn Main & Sherwood 129.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP E ROSSI ST TOM O WONG WY
BRIDGE ST
N MAIN ST SHERWOOD DR REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES 25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
20 3 6.00% 8.00% MPH
21 1 2.00% 10.00% MPH
22 3 6.00% 16.00% MPH
23 2 4.00% 20.00%
24 7 14.00% 34.00%
25 4 8.00% 42.00%
26 4 8.00% 50.00%
27 2 4.00% 54.00%
28 4 8.00% 62.00%
29 3 6.00% 68.00%
30 5 10.00% 78.00%
31 2 4.00% 82.00%
32 4 8.00% 90.00%
33 4 8.00% 98.00%
34 0 0.00% 98.00%
35 1 2.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.6 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C
Comments:
02:29
Monday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
39 26
Vehicles in Pace:
02:51
East Rossi Street Direction: EBD
North Main Street and Sherwood Drive
151 East Rossi Street
05/12/25
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
4.1 0.3418
78.0%
33 32
Standard Deviation:
No. 129
32 26.9
17.09 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 22 To: 31 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 1 2.00% 2.00%
19 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
21 1 2.00% 4.00% MPH
22 2 4.00% 8.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 10.00%
24 3 6.00% 16.00%
25 3 6.00% 22.00%
26 7 14.00% 36.00%
27 5 10.00% 46.00%
28 6 12.00% 58.00%
29 8 16.00% 74.00%
30 7 14.00% 88.00%
31 4 8.00% 96.00%
32 1 2.00% 98.00%
33 0 0.00% 98.00%
34 0 0.00% 98.00%
35 1 2.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 30
90th Percentile Speed: 31
Vehicles in Pace: 46
50th Percentile Speed: 28
95th Percentile Speed: 31
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 92.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.1
Variance of the Mean: 0.1936
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.4
Sample Variance: 9.68
02:29 02:51
No. 129
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
Between:
East Rossi Street Direction: WBD
North Main Street and Sherwood Drive
Survey Location: 151 East Rossi Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/12/25 Monday
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 1 1.00% 1.00%
19 1 1.00% 2.00% MPH
20 3 3.00% 5.00% MPH
21 2 2.00% 7.00% MPH
22 5 5.00% 12.00% MPH
23 3 3.00% 15.00%
24 10 10.00% 25.00%
25 7 7.00% 32.00%
26 11 11.00% 43.00%
27 7 7.00% 50.00%
28 10 10.00% 60.00%
29 11 11.00% 71.00%
30 12 12.00% 83.00%
31 6 6.00% 89.00%
32 5 5.00% 94.00%
33 4 4.00% 98.00%
34 0 0.00% 98.00%
35 2 2.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 33
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 32
Vehicles in Pace: 83
50th Percentile Speed: 27
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 83.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.1332
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.2
Sample Variance: 13.32
Street: Comments:
Between:
East Rossi Street Direction:EBD/WBD
North Main Street and Sherwood Drive
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
No. 129
Survey Location: 151 East Rossi Street
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Date: 05/12/25 Monday
02:29 02:51
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
SEE MAP 6N44
SEE MAP 6P14
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Salinas
MONTEREY
·|}þ183
·|}þ68
·|}þ183
SALINAS
SANTA RITA
BOLSA KNOLLS
E Alisal St
E Alvin Dr
Market Way
John St
Williams Rd
W Alisal St
W Rossi St
N Main St
N Sanborn Rd
Pajaro St
Work St
Boronda Rd
Constitution Blvd
E Laurel Dr
Riker St
Lincoln Ave
E Bernal Dr
Abbott St
Cll del Adobe
Post Dr
E Rossi St
Main St
Constitution Blvd
·|}þ183
·|}þ ·|}þ68 183
·|}þ183
£¤101
£¤101
N Main St
E Boronda Rd
E Laurel Dr
N Davis Rd
Natividad Rd
S Davis Rd
E Alisal St
Davis Rd
Sherwood Dr
W Laurel Dr
Salinas St
Monterey St
Market Way
N Sanborn Rd
Boronda Rd
W Laurel Dr
N Sanborn Rd
Towt St
San Juan Grade Rd
Rider Ave
Blanco Rd
Central Ave
Chaparral St
Russell Rd
Garner Ave
Harden Pkwy
W Acacia St
Larkin Dr
del Monte Ave
Navajo Dr
el Dorado Dr
Villa St
Iris Dr
Rico St
Bardin Rd
Clay St
Independence Blvd
McKinnon St
Linwood Dr
Freedom Pkwy
Nantucket Blvd
Maryal Dr
Maple St
Tyler St
Casentini St
Beacon Hill Dr
W Alvin Dr
Skyway Blvd
Adams St
Arcadia Way
Iverson St
S Hebbron Ave
Arcadia St
Espinosa Rd
Old Stage Rd
Date: 3/30/16
SEE MAP 6N53
SEE MAP 6N55
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz
CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
A B C D E F G H J K
A B C D E F G H J K
MAP 6N54
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES
COUNTY BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
SIGN ROUTES
INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ1 STATE
§¨¦5
SEE MAP 6N54
SEE MAP 6P24
!(
!(
MONTEREY
·|}þ68
AbbottSt
RomieLn
PajaroSt
RikerSt
WorkSt
HarrisRd
AlisalSt
Salinas
Salinas
£¤101
County Hwy G17
HarkinsRd
HarrisRd
SpreckelsBlvd
AbbottSt
IversonSt
Los PalosDr
AcaciaSt
San MiguelAve
TervenAve
HattonAve
AirportBlvd
HansenSt
HarrisCt
San JoaquinSt
HarrisRd
SALINAS MUNI
SPRECKELS
£¤101
US
Hwy 101El Camino Real
US
Hwy 101El Camino
Real
BlancoRd
State Hwy 68Monterey SalinasHwy
SanbornRd
Ramp
State Hwy 68SMainSt
Ramp
Ramp
AbbottSt
RomieLn
PajaroSt
WorkSt
RikerSt
HarkinsRd
HarrisRd
County Hwy G17RiverRd
SpreckelsBlvd
AbbottSt
IversonS t
County Hwy G17ReservationRd
PortolaDr
PortolaDr PortolaDr
BlancoRd
SanbornRd
Ramp
Date 8/5/11
SEE MAP 6P13
SEE MAP 6P15
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz
CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
A B C D E F G H J K
A B C D E F G H J K
MAP 6P14
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SIGN ROUTES
INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
STATE
4567
D2 COUNTY
|ÿ1
§¨¦5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES
COUNTY BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
SEE MAP 6N45
SEE MAP 6P15
!(
MONTEREY
Williams Rd
N Sanborn Rd
Salinas
Old Stage Rd
Williams Rd
Alisal Rd
Freedom Pkwy
Old StageRd
Old StageRd
BorondaRd
Old StageRd
WilliamsRd
Old StageRd
E Boronda Rd
Date 8/5/11
SEE MAP 6N54
SEE MAP 7N
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz
CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
A B C D E F G H J K
A B C D E F G H J K
MAP 6N55
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SIGN ROUTES
INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
STATE
4567
D2 COUNTY
|ÿ1
§¨¦5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES
COUNTY BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#25-325, Version: 1
Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map
Adopt an Ordinance adopting by reference the State of California Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map entitled “City of Salinas-Monterey County Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones”.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/7/2025
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 12, 2025
DEPARTMENT: FIRE
FROM: SAMUEL KLEMEK, FIRE CHIEF
TITLE: FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES MAP
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Adopt an ordinance adopting by reference the State of California Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map entitled “City of Salinas—Monterey County Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
California Government Code Section 51179 requires that the local agencies, including the City of Salinas, to adopt an ordinance adopting the Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone map prepared by the State of California Office of the State Fire Marshal. This statewide legislation is part of the larger state effort aimed at reducing wildfire risk and bolstering response capabilities.
Once adopted the ordinance will become effective thirty (30) days thereafter.
BACKGROUND:
In March of 2025, the Salinas Fire Department received the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps from the State Fire Marshal’s Office. These maps were developed by state officials pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, which mandates the identification and classification of areas in California based on their relative fire hazard severity. The designation is a crucial step in implementing fire prevention strategies and ensuring the safety of residents in high-hazard areas.
The maps do not limit or restrict the City’s authority to impose more restrictive fire and public safety requirements, as otherwise authorized by law. No further local revisions or restrictions to this map are proposed in this ordinance.
It is important to remember that these maps measure hazard and not risk. Fire “hazard” is based on physical conditions that create a likelihood and expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year period without considering mitigation measures such as home hardening, recent wildfires, or fuel reduction.
Page | 2
Fire “risk” is the potential damage a fire can do to the area under existing conditions, accounting for any modifications such as fuel reduction projects, defensible space, and ignition-resistant building construction.
Though the hazard has been reduced in much of the City, this does not mean properties are less at risk. The maps do not incorporate structure density and limited evacuation routes. The Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps, created by the state, are developed using scientific models that assess factors such as vegetation, topography, and weather patterns that contribute to fire behavior. These maps are instrumental in guiding building standards, defensible space requirements in new developments and application of fire safe regulations.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Statutory Exemption. The proposed ordinance adopting the Fire Hazard Severity Zones as recommended by the State Fire Marshal is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a ministerial action, required by law.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
Public Safety - Continue to improve community safety by engaging residents and using a broad range of proactive approaches that emphasize community connection and prevention programs.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
This Fire Department has shared this information with the Community Development Department for incorporation into future planning and development policies and projects.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
Fund Appropriation Appropriation
Name
Total
Appropriation
Amount for
recommendation
FY 25-26
Operating
Budget Page
Last Budget
Action (Date,
Resolution)*
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
* The FY 25-26 Adopted Budget was adopted on June 17, 2025.
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Ordinance
City of Salinas Fire Hazard Severity map
City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1)
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources:
Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of California Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. and other relevant factors including areas where winds
have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.
statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire
Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Waterbody
Federal Responsibility
Area (FRA)
Unzoned LRA
Incorporated City
Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers
Scale: 1:47,000 at 11" x 17"
Km 0 1 2 3
Mi 0 1 2
High Moderate
Very High High Moderate
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal
Salinas
101
68 183
UNINCORPORATED
MONTEREY CO.
UNINCORPORATED
MONTEREY CO.
March 10, 2025
As Identified by the
State Fire Marshal
Local Responsibility Area
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
CITY OF SALINAS – MONTEREY COUNTY
Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility
Area (SRA), Effective April 1, 2024
1 ORDINANCE NO. ______________ (N.C.S.)
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA “FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES” MAP.
WHEREAS, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas, including based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, winds, and other relevant factors; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 51181 requires the State Fire Marshal to periodically review the areas in the state identified as very high fire hazard severity zones and, as necessary, make recommendations relative to very high fire hazard severity zones, including every five years if possible; and
WHEREAS, the Office of the State Fire Marshal has set forth the most recent update to the Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) map to better identify statewide wildfire safety risks in state and local jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, this map was updated based upon the recommendations of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire) pursuant to Government Code Section 51178; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 51179 requires local agencies by ordinance to designate moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones within their jurisdictions following receipt of updated recommendations from the State Fire Marshal; and WHEREAS, the City received from the State Fire Marshal a map entitled “City of Salinas—Monterey County Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, consistent with Government Code section 51178.5, within thirty (30) days after receiving this transmittal, the City made the proposed map, and all information contained therein available for public review and comment in a format that was understandable and accessible to the general public, including posting on the City of Salinas Fire Department website.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF SALINAS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map as designated by the Office of the State Fire Marshal and entitled “City of Salinas—Monterey County Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones,” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby adopted and designated as the map delineating fire hazard safety zones for the City of Salinas.
2 SECTION 2. Consistent with Government Code section51179(c), the Salinas Fire Marshal shall transmit a copy of this ordinance to the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection within thirty (30) days of adoption.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances and all resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed as of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Salinas City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each and every section, subsection, clause, and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. CEQA Compliance. The City Council’s adoption of this ordinance is not a project subject to environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15060(c)(1) because this action does not involve the exercise of discretionary powers and section 15061(b)(3) because it would not have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 6. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause a summary of this ordinance to be published once in a newspaper published and circulated in Salinas within fifteen (15) days after adoption. (Salinas Charter Section 11.9)
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.
This ordinance was introduced on the 12
th day of August 2025, and passed and adopted on the
___ day of ___ 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
3 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
Attachment:
Exhibit A: City of Salinas—Monterey County Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#25-341, Version: 1
FY 25-26 Workforce Allocation Adjustment
Approve a Resolution modifying the workforce allocation for the Police Department to add one Public Safety Recruitment Coordinator position and one Public Safety Communications Specialist position, respectively.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/7/2025
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 12, 2025
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
FROM: RENÉ MENDEZ, CITY MANAGER
TITLE: FY 25-26 WORKFORCE ALLOCATION ADJUSTMENT
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a Resolution modifying the workforce allocation for the Police Department to add one Public Safety Recruitment Coordinator position and one Public Safety Communications Specialist position, respectively.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff recommend that the City Council approve the attached Resolution modifying the workforce allocation for the Police Departments. This modification will add one Recruitment Coordinator and one Public Safety Communications Specialist to the Police Department’s workforce.
BACKGROUND:
As part of both the FY 2024-25 and the FY 2025-26 budget process, the Police Department requested the addition of one Personnel & Training Specialist position and one Public Safety Communications Specialist position. Though not funded as part of the City’s annual budget process, these position requests were discussed during the June 10, 2025, Finance Committee Meeting, and during the June 17, 2025, City Council Meeting. During both meetings, staff were provided direction to focus on these position requests and bring them back to the City Council for consideration sooner rather than later.
In the FY 2025-26 request for a Personnel & Training Specialist, the Police Department stated this new position would support recruitment activities by ensuring timely outreach, communication, and follow-through with prospective and confirmed applicants. This will include coordination of the background investigation process, oversight of consultant contracts, and communication with candidates going through the recruitment and background investigation process. During calendar year 2024, there were a total of 88 background investigations initiated through contracted background investigators. In addition to those assigned backgrounds, many additional applicants were reviewed and evaluated by internal staff before determining not to move forward with a background investigation. While the bulk of the background investigations are completed by a contract investigator, staff must monitor the progress, ensure timely scheduling and follow-through on required testing, and stay in communication with applicants to ensure they remain engaged Page | 2
during the lengthy recruitment and hiring process. As the Police Department continues to focus on increasing their sworn workforce, this position is critical to ensure timely follow-up on applicants which can increase the likelihood of sustaining viable candidates through the lengthy recruitment process and thus reduce unnecessary costs associated with losing qualified candidates prior to hiring. This position will also coordinate training workshops for potential applicants and assist with administrative coordination and reporting as required by policy and legislation. It is important to note that from 2017 through 2021 the Police Department had a dedicated Recruitment Officer, and this civilian position will provide similar services. The current Personnel & Training Specialist classification is inactive. After further discussion and analysis, a more appropriate title and classification would be a Public Safety Recruitment Coordinator, which currently does not exist. The Police Department will work with the Human Resources Department to develop the job description to meet the current needs of the department and subsequently amend the Classification Salary Schedule.
In their FY 2025-26 request for a Public Safety Communications Specialist, the Police Department stated that as one of the largest and most active departments in the city, the need for a full-time and dedicated position is necessary to coordinate media activities, communicate critical information and reports to the community, share updates and outcomes of police operations, and share community events. Currently, press releases, media requests, and social media communication are completed by a small team of sworn staff, often on an overtime basis. Duties of this position will align with the existing Communications Specialist job description, including reviewing, coordinating, creating, and overseeing a wide variety of public information and media projects within the communications, promotions, and public relations arena. The addition of this position will support the Police Department’s priority of community engagement and relational equity by allowing the department to be more proactive and responsive in communications with the public and help ensure consistent and community-focused messaging. In addition, the Public Safety Communication Specialist will work in close collaboration with City’s Community Relations Manager (PIO).
Due to the extended timeline involved in hiring Police Department positions, it is anticipated that sufficient funding will be available within the Police Department’s FY 2025-26 budget to support these new positions. However, should hiring take place sooner than expected and additional funds are needed this FY, it will be addressed as part of the Mid-Year Budget process.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
Approving the proposed Resolution will support the City Council’s Strategic Plan Goals of Public Safety and City Services.
Page | 3
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
Administration staff worked with the Human Resources Department, Finance Department, and Police Department in this effort.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
Due to the extended timeline involved in hiring Police Department positions, a pro-rated share (10 months) of the fully loaded cost for each position is being recommended for appropriation. The Public Safety Communications Specialist portion is $118,600 and the Public Safety Recruitment Coordinator is currently estimated to $108,500 for a total of $227,100. Depending on actual start dates, salary savings in FY 2025-26 could be realized. Future annual costs are $142,400 for the Public Safety Communications Specialist and estimated at $130,100 for the Public Safety Recruitment Coordinator, for a total of $272,500.
Fund Appropriation Appropriation
Name
Total
Appropriation
Amount for
recommendation
FY 25-26
Operating
Budget Page
Last Budget
Action (Date,
Resolution)*
1000-
1200
General Funds Salaries &
Benefits
$0 $227,100 N/A N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Page | 4
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)
RESOLUTION APPROVING FY25-26 WORKFORCE ALLOCATION ADJUSTMENT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALINAS that the workforce of the Police Department shall be adjusted to reflect one Public Safety Recruitment Coordinator, and one Public Safety Communications Specialist, respectively.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a budget allocation of $227,100 for position costs be authorized from General Funds fund balance.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of August 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
______________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#25-097, Version: 1
Economic Opportunities Map
No action required. Receive a report on the City of Salinas Economic Opportunities Map.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/7/2025
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 12, 2025
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
FROM: LISA MURPHY, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
SOPHIA ROME, COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER
TITLE: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES MAP
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
This is an informational item only. No action is required.
Receive a report on the City’s Economic Opportunities Map.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Salinas is committed to fostering economic development, enhancing public engagement, and leveraging technology to improve transparency and accessibility. As part of this effort, the City Manager’s Office and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) team have developed an Economic Opportunities Map, an interactive tool designed to visualize key assets, such as development opportunities, recreational amenities, and plan implementation areas for previously approved specific plans. This map will serve as a dynamic resource for residents, businesses, and stakeholders to explore growth opportunities across Salinas, supporting informed decision-making and encouraging economic investment.
BACKGROUND:
The City Manager’s Office has worked with the GIS team to create an interactive mapping tool that allows the City, stakeholders, and residents to easily visualize relevant data on infrastructure and planning efforts. The goal is to help identify development opportunities and track ongoing projects in Salinas. The City of Salinas Economic Opportunities Map is designed to highlight areas with potential for economic investment and community development while breaking down information silos. This initiative directly supports the Council’s Strategic Goal of Economic Development by promoting and expanding opportunities across the City and supporting both new and existing businesses to drive economic growth and job creation.
The Economic Opportunities Map will help the City share information about where growth is happening and where new opportunities may emerge. By bringing together data on ongoing projects, parks and recreation amenities, approved specific plan areas, and business and retail locations, the map gives residents, business owners, and developers an easy way to explore development activity and understand how Salinas is growing.
Page | 2
Economic development is vital to Salinas as it fosters job creation, strengthens local businesses, and enhances community prosperity. Located on the City’s Economic Development webpage, the Economic Opportunities Map will be updated regularly to reflect new projects and information.
This tool supports thoughtful, sustainable growth and ensures that Salinas remains a vibrant, forward-looking City.
Because the map is dynamic with links to information, it will be shared at the Council meeting before going live.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
Economic Development
Support and engage both new and established businesses to drive economic growth and job creation
Strategically explore and expand economic development opportunities throughout the City DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The development of the Economic Opportunities Map has been a collaborative effort between the City Manager’s Office and the GIS team. However, updating the data and content has been coordinated among all City departments.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
Fund Appropriation Appropriation
Name
Total
Appropriation
Amount for
recommendation
FY 25-26
Operating
Budget Page
Last Budget
Action (Date,
Resolution)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#25-096, Version: 1
City of Salinas Communication, Outreach & Engagement Strategy No action required. Receive a report on City’s Communication, Outreach & Engagement Strategy.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/7/2025
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 12, 2025
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
FROM: RENÉ MENDEZ, CITY MANAGER
SOPHIA ROME, COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER
TITLE: CITY OF SALINAS COMMUNICATION, OUTREACH &
ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
This is an informational item only. Receive a report on the City of Salinas Communication, Outreach & Engagement Strategy; no action required.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Community outreach and engagement is an essential service provided by the City of Salinas. The Communication, Outreach & Engagement Strategy (Communication Strategy) is designed to establish standards and best practices in communication and is intended to equip staff with the knowledge, tools, and strategies required to facilitate inclusive outreach and engagement with the community. The Communication Strategy provides a framework for citywide communications aimed at strengthening consistency, increasing reach to the community and stakeholders, and serving as a foundation for staff training grounded in proven strategies and best practices in local government communication and community relations.
BACKGROUND:
The City’s existing Communication Strategy has not been updated since it was first implemented in 2016. Over the last nine years, there have been significant changes in the way residents receive and consume information, and the communication tools used to disseminate that information. The needs of the community and best practices in communication have also changed. Additionally, in 2020, the City hired its first Community Relations Manager who is designated as the City’s Public Information Officer (PIO). This has created the opportunity to develop a communication strategy that focuses on equitable outreach and engagement, establishes best practices for communication that align with the City’s goals, breaking down information silos, and providing staff with tools to approach communication as a service to the community.
Earlier this year, the City Council identified engaging residents and improving communication with the community as a strategy under the City Services Goal in the 2025 – 2028 Strategic Plan.
The update to the existing Communication Strategy will support this goal by improving citywide Page | 2
communication, outreach and engagement. The overarching goals of the Communication Strategy are:
Inform the public as an essential service to the community Encourage civic engagement
Support and advance equity through outreach and engagement Ensure consistent and strategic branding and messaging Define leadership and staff roles and responsibilities in communication, outreach, and engagement efforts
Some departments, like Fire and Police, already have designated department-level PIOs – as is a common practice in public safety – who work closely with the Community Relations Manager.
Implementation of the Communication Strategy will seek to model these types of established best practices by forming a staff communications committee comprised of at least one liaison from each department to meet on a regular basis with the goal of breaking down information silos and work towards consistency in the City’s communication, outreach, and engagement efforts.
Training will also be provided to staff, with training topics and timing being informed by the communications committee.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The Communication Strategy aligns with the Strategic Goal of City Services, specifically engaging residents and improving communication with the community. In addition, it supports all strategic goals as effective communication, outreach and engagement are necessary to effectively inform residents and create opportunities for equitable public engagement.
Page | 3
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The Communication Outreach & Engagement Strategy was developed through collaboration with City Administration, Community Development, and Library and Community Services.
Department staff worked together to identify overarching goals and strategies. Additionally, the City’s Executive team has reviewed and provided feedback Communication Strategy.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
Fund Appropriation Appropriation
Name
Total
Appropriation
Amount for
recommendation
FY 24-25
Operating
Budget Page
Last Budget
Action (Date,
Resolution)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
A framework for inclusive citywide communications and
engagement.
City of Salinas
Administration Department
August 2025
COMMUNICATION, OUTREACH
& ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
Table of
Contents
Purpose
Communication Goals
Goal 1: Inform the public as an essential
service to the community
Goal 2: Encourage civic engagement
Spectrum of Community Engagement
Goal 3: Support and advance equity through
outreach and engagement
Goal 4: Ensure consistent and strategic
branding and messaging
Goal 5: 1.Define leadership and staff roles and
responsibilities in communication, outreach,
and engagement efforts
3 4
5 7
9 15
17 19
Communication is an
Essential Service
P U R P O S E
Community outreach and engagement are essential services provided by the City of Salinas. The Communication, Outreach & Engagement Strategy (Communication Strategy) is designed to establish standards and best practices in communication and is tailored to equip staff with the knowledge, tools, and strategies required to facilitate inclusive outreach and engagement with the community.
The purpose of the Communication Strategy is to make citywide communications and engagement consistent, unifying, and centralized in a way that fosters cooperation within the organization and with residents. The City’s approach to inclusive communication and engagement hinges on an understanding of the unique challenges, needs, and priorities within the Salinas community. It is about actively listening, acknowledging historical contexts, and partnering collaboratively with our community to help us achieve that goal.
Communication is an essential service to the community and central to the effective operation of the City. The Communication Strategy aims to support and enhance operations through ethical and equitable outreach by increasing transparency, expanding community reach, breaking down information silos, and providing staff with tools to effectively inform and engage the community.
The Community Relations Manager will update the Communication Strategy as needed, but at a minimum, every two years, to support and enhance effective operations through ethical and equitable outreach and engagement while keeping up with best practices in communications, outreach and engagement.
0 3
1 2
3 4
5 Inform the public as an essential service to the
community
Encourage civic engagement
Support and advance equity through outreach and
engagement
Ensure consistent and strategic branding and
messaging
Define leadership and staff roles and responsibilities
in communication, outreach, and engagement
efforts
The overarching goals of the Communication Strategy are to:
0 4
Overarching Goals
C O M M U N I C A T I O N G O A L S
Clear, consistent, and accessible communication is a fundamental responsibility of the City. Ensuring that residents are informed about City operations, services, and initiatives is not only an essential service, but a key factor in fostering civic engagement and trust. Whether communicating routine updates, sharing information on community meetings/events or disseminating information on urgent matters, the City must prioritize transparency and clarity (sharing information in common language) to ensure information reaches all segments of the community effectively.
Strategy 1.1: Proactive Dissemination of Information
Effective communication goes beyond responding to inquiries and requires a forward-thinking approach to ensure that information reaches residents before they have to seek it out. Proactive dissemination is a strategy that delivers timely, relevant information and updates in a clear, accessible manner, which means utilizing a multi-channel approach that meets residents where they are, whether through digital platforms, printed materials, in-person outreach, or partnerships with trusted community organizations.
Proactive dissemination also means anticipating information needs.
Rather than waiting for questions or concerns to arise, the City should regularly assess what residents need to know and strategically distribute information accordingly. This is especially important for topics such as City budgeting, infrastructure projects, and emergency communications, where early engagement can improve community understanding and effective participation. Additionally, ensuring that information is presented in plain, common language—free from jargon and unnecessary complexity—will make City communications more approachable and inclusive.
INFORM THE PUBLIC AS AN
ESSENTIAL SERVICE TO THE
COMMUNITY
G O A L 1
0 5
By embracing this proactive approach, the City can strengthen transparency, build trust, and empower residents with the knowledge they need to engage with the City effectively.
Strategy 1.2: Using Multiple Methods of Sharing Information Informing the public is not simply a task of disseminating information (the traditional “checking the box”); it is a commitment to proactive outreach engagement, inclusivity, and accessibility. The City’s communication efforts must reflect the diversity of Salinas, ensuring that residents receive relevant updates in formats and languages that meet their needs. The approach must be adaptable, acknowledging that no single communication method will serve all audiences or situations.
Strategy 1.3: Providing Access to Public Information
Public access to information is a legal and ethical obligation under the California Public Records Act (PRA). As a guiding principle of government transparency, the PRA ensures that residents can request and review public records related to City business. The City upholds this responsibility by maintaining public records under the PRA and offering access for public inquiries to foster a culture of transparency and trust.
0 6
0 7
ENCOURAGE CIVIC
ENGAGEMENT
G O A L 2
Effective communication helps residents and stakeholders connect and work productively with their City. Civic engagement is more than participation; it requires fostering ongoing relationships with the community built on trust, accessibility, and meaningful dialogue. By ensuring that communication is service-oriented, responsive, and inclusive, the City can empower residents to engage in the governance process in a way that is informed and impactful.
This approach also recognizes that engagement is not one-sided.
Collaboration, shared investment, and sustained partnerships are foundational to effective outreach and engagement. By removing barriers to participation, addressing community concerns transparently, and proactively supporting engagement efforts, the City can strengthen civic involvement and build a governance model that reflects the needs and priorities of Salinas residents and stakeholders.
Strategy 2.1: Encouraging Service-Oriented, Responsive
Engagement
Take a service-oriented approach to communication by engaging with the community proactively, responding to questions/comments, and providing accessible information that encourages informed civic participation. Clear and supportive communication fosters trust and engagement, even in difficult conversations.
Clear and concise written and verbal communication – Refrain from technical terms and jargon. In order for residents to effectively participate, they need to understand the information being shared.
Accessible and inclusive communication – Consider diverse language, cultural, and accessibility needs when sharing information. Use multiple formats and outreach methods to ensure all residents have equitable access to City communications, including those with accessibility needs or limited digital access.
Active listening and adaptive messaging – Approach community interactions with a listening-first mindset, ensuring responses are not just informative but also tailored to the concerns and perspectives of the community. Adapt messaging based on community feedback to keep outreach efforts relevant and effective.
Timely and transparent responses to inquiries – Acknowledge and address community questions and concerns in a timely manner to demonstrate accountability and encourage ongoing engagement. Consistent and responsive communication builds trust and reassures residents that their voices are valued. 0 8
Strategy 2.2: Building Relationships to Strengthen Trust and Engagement
Cultivate strong, reciprocal relationships with local organizations, schools, and businesses to expand communication efforts. True engagement (connection and participation) goes beyond outreach (dissemination of information). Effective engagement requires ongoing support, collaboration, and a shared commitment to community well-being. Strengthening the relationships with our community partners ensures that engagement is not just a one-way request for their support but a genuine partnership.
Strategy 2.3: Strategic Design of Outreach and Engagement Plans Engagement must be approached with cultural awareness and sensitivity, prioritizing sustained relationships that recognize the leadership and insights of local voices. Use the Spectrum of Community Engagement (page 43 of the Alisal Vibrancy Plan) and other tools to assess the appropriate level of outreach for programs, projects, and services, ensuring community engagement goes beyond minimum legal requirements to maximize impact.
Spectrum of Community Engagement
0 9
Outreach vs. Engagement: Outreach focuses on sharing and disseminating information through multiple platforms to inform stakeholders about key issues, decisions, and opportunities.
Engagement, on the other hand, is a collaborative process that meets people where they are, fostering meaningful participation and strengthening relationships between the organization, residents, and stakeholders.
Informing vs. Achieving Consensus or Consent: Outreach can be designed either to inform, gain consensus or gain consent, each serving a distinct purpose. The decision on which approach is most appropriate should be strategically applied based on engagement goals.
Inform – sharing information transparently
Consensus – working toward agreement
Consent – acceptance through informing with dialogue
Equality (Sameness) vs. Equity (Fairness) in Outreach & Engagement: Equality provides the same level of resources to all, while equity acknowledges different circumstances and allocates resources based on needs to ensure fair participation. Truly inclusive outreach recognizes disparities and adjusts engagement efforts accordingly to create opportunities for all voices to be heard.
Inclusion as an Outcome: Engagement efforts must be intentional in reaching diverse populations equitably, ensuring that all communities, especially historically underrepresented groups, are meaningfully included. Inclusion is not just about participation numbers but about fostering a sense of belonging in decisionmaking.
Collaboration as a Foundation for Trust: Successful engagement is built on authentic partnerships with community partners, organizations, and residents. Active participation should not just seek input but to foster co-creation of solutions that reflect the priorities of the community. A relationship-driven approach ensures that engagement is rooted in trust and not transactional.
Partnering with Community Messengers: Recognize the role of community partners in facilitating engagement, especially where there may be engagement hesitancy or limited trust with the City as an organization. Collaborating with leaders and partners in the community can strengthen outreach efforts by ensuring
communication is culturally relevant, relationship-driven, and accessible to all segments of the community.
1 0
Strategy 2.4: Data – Driven Engagement
Regularly evaluate and refine communication strategies using surveys, feedback channels, and engagement metrics. Leverage data analytics to identify community needs, measure outreach effectiveness, and guide future improvements. Track engagement levels across platforms and use post-event surveys to assess whether community members felt engaged, gathering insights to shape more impactful communication efforts.
Strategy 2.5: Identify Barriers to Participation
Effective communication between the City of Salinas and its diverse communities is essential for fostering trust, civic engagement, and equitable access to resources. However, several persistent barriers complicate meaningful outreach and participation, including the need to build trust-based relationships, language access, and intimidating bureaucratic processes. These challenges demand more than a standardized approach; overcoming them requires intentional, adaptive strategies that acknowledge the nuances of each barrier and the diverse needs of Salinas residents.
By recognizing that communication is not a one-size-fits-all effort, the City can create a more inclusive and responsive system that ensures every resident has access to the information, services, and opportunities they need to engage fully in local governance. 1 1
A. Trust
Any effective relationship is built on trust, and communication with the community is no different. The reasons we need to build trust can vary. It could be based in experience where residents felt there was a lack of communication and engagement with past initiatives. It could also stem from limited awareness or knowledge of laws or regulatory requirements/processes. Little to no past engagement with the City could be another reason that trust needs to be established. When trust has not been established, the desire to participate can be seen with lack of value, suspicion and scrutiny, possibly discouraging participation, compromising trust and hindering effective collaboration and progress.
To build trust, Salinas must prioritize transparency, consistency, and relationship-building through genuine, sustained outreach rather than transactional communication.
B. Language Access
Salinas is home to a large Spanish-speaking population, as well as Indigenous language speakers and other linguistic minorities. Without consideration for language access, information fails to reach our diverse community, including critical city updates, emergency alerts, and community resources and programs. The City must ensure that messaging is not just translated but adapted for clarity, cultural relevance, and accessibility.
C. Digital Divide
While online platforms have become essential outreach tools, reliance on digital communication alone risks exclusion of residents with limited internet access or digital literacy skills. Aging community members, linguistically diverse communities and lower-income households face disproportionate barriers in engaging with online City resources. A successful strategy must incorporate consideration of the need for multilingual printed materials, in-person meetings, and partnerships with trusted community groups to bridge this gap, particularly as it relates to information or initiatives that impact community members with a limited to no digital access or digital literacy skills.
1 2
D. Intimidating Bureaucratic Processes and Complex Regulations Even for the most seasoned community participant, navigating City processes can be daunting. Complex government procedures, such as permitting, public comment forums and means for participation, and grant applications, can feel overwhelming to many, thereby discouraging participation; this includes understanding when and how to participate and why participation is important.
Simplifying these processes through clear, step-by-step guidance, accessible formats, and community partners can help ensure more residents can confidently engage with City services. Communicating these regulations and processes in plain language, with communityled educational sessions, can make engaging with the City more approachable.
E. Engagement Hesitancy
Some residents may hesitate to engage with local government due to past negative experiences or uncertainty about how their voice will be valued. Traditional outreach methods that feel performative or rigid often fail to inspire meaningful participation. The City must foster dialogue that empowers residents and communicate how the feedback has led to actionable outcomes.
While a staple of municipal governance is to deliberate forums like town halls and public hearings, it often is not suited to meaningful dialogue with the community. The type of forum for participation should be determined based on the needs of the segment(s) of the community the City is informing or engaging. The needed level of community engagement can be determined based on the type and impact of project/initiative, and the Spectrum of Community Engagement (pg. 9) , a tested and effective tool to define those needs. 1 3
1 4
F. Location, Time and Services
Where and when community
engagement opportunities occur
matters. Conducting community
engagement during inconvenient
times, for example, during the
workday or when it is difficult to
arrange care for family members, can
be limiting for many individuals.
However, if the audience we are
engaging is the business community
or other agencies, before work hours
or during lunch may be more
accommodating.
The location of an engagement event
can also be a barrier. Considerations
for transportation limitations and
access can be utilizing a space that is
closer/centralized for the communities
we need to engage and/or considering
including an additional remote/virtual
engagement opportunity. Additional
services should also be considered like
food and childcare.
SUPPORT AND ADVANCE
EQUITY THROUGH
OUTREACH & ENGAGEMENT
G O A L 3
City communications must ensure that all residents have equal access to information, services, and civic engagement, acknowledging the diversity of the population across language, age, access, and background. Thoughtful, strategic outreach must proactively address these disparities, including awareness of implicit bias, to ensure equitable, inclusive engagement that reflects the needs and priorities of all community members.
Strategy 3.1: Equitable Access to Information and Participation Integrate accessibility and engagement into outreach planning – Prioritize equitable access by allocating adequate time, budget, and resources to ensure outreach efforts reach residents effectively.
Leverage the expertise of the Community Relations Team – Consult with the Community Relations team for support in developing inclusive and responsive outreach and engagement strategies that address our diverse community needs.
Strategy 3.2: Language Access and Cultural Inclusion
Bilingual communication materials – Provide all public-facing content – social media posts, brochures, and flyers – in both English and Spanish, ensuring accessibility for the City's large Spanishspeaking population. Information in other languages should also be considered when thinking about the audience we are engaging and with accessibility in mind.
Maintain bilingual forms and services – Offer Spanish-language forms and translation services at City facilities and meetings. 1 5
1 6
Strategy 3.3: Digital and Accessibility Standards
Ensure digital accessibility for residents – Follow WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) to make digital content more inclusive and user-friendly.
w3.org/TR/WCAG22
Train staff in accessible content creation – Provide training and resources for staff to ensure City digital communications meet accessibility best practices and remain compliant with federal standards.
ENSURE CONSISTENT &
STRATEGIC BRANDING &
MESSAGING
G O A L 4
The City’s brand represents its identity, values, and commitment to the community. Consistency in public communications, including the appropriate use of the City’s logo and seal, ensures clarity, professionalism, and trust in the City's messaging. All branding efforts must align with established guidelines to maintain a unified brand across departments and outreach initiatives.
Strategy 4.1: Represent the City's Brand with Consistency & Purpose
Ensure branding consistency across public communications – All consultant-led work involving public communication must include the Community Relations Manager team to ensure compliance with the Communication Strategy, review branding elements, and provide guidance on outreach and engagement strategy.
Use approved templates for official documents – Plans, documents, letterhead, email signatures, and other branding templates available on the City’s Intranet must be used to maintain a unified identity.
Strategy 4.2: Proper Use of Logos and Visual Identity
Maintain consistency in logo usage – The City’s official logo must be used across all City communications with the following exceptions:
City Council, Board, Commission, & Committee Agendas
Legal notices that require use of the City seal
Documents where use of the seal is required
Departmental logo exceptions – The Salinas Fire and Police Departments may use their official logos without the City logo, except in crisis communications, where alignment with citywide branding remains essential.
1 7
1 8
Coordinate branding approval for public signage – The Community Relations Manager must approve any replacement or addition of signage in public spaces, including building signs, doors, and the use of the City’s logo or seal.
Design of new logos - The more logos that exist, the greater the potential to dilute the brand recognition of the City. This means that the more department or project specific logos that exist, the more challenging it can be for the community to know whether the logo is connected to the City. To that end, design of new logos is discouraged and requires pre-approval and final approval by the City Manager or designee.
Strategy 4.3: Staff Training and Brand Stewardship
Equip staff with branding and communication best practices – Regular training on content creation, marketing, and citywide communication standards ensures consistency and reinforces the principles of the Communication Strategy.
DEFINE LEADERSHIP & STAFF
ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES
IN COMMUNICATION,
OUTREACH, & ENGAGEMENT
EFFORTS
G O A L 5
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Community Relations is part of the Administration Department under the City Manager’s Office. The Community Relations Manager serves as the Public Information Officer (PIO) for the City, and the Communications Specialist in Community Relations serves as the City’s Assistant Public Information Officer (APIO). The Community Relations team oversees public communication and serves as the primary point of contact for media inquiries and management of the City’s social media accounts and websites. While departments may manage department-level accounts and webpages, the Community Relations Manager will conduct regular reviews to ensure consistency with branding, messaging, and communication style, reinforcing a unified voice across all platforms that aligns with the City’s values and strategic goals.
Public Information Officer Access to Information
A key function of the Community Relations team is to provide public news releases through the City’s communications channels, including social media, the website, email, and text messages. To create this content and provide updates, there must be an open exchange of information. In most instances, the Community Relations team will reach out to staff to obtain information several weeks or more in advance. However, there will be occasions where information is needed on a more immediate basis.
1 9
2 0
While not an exhaustive list, here are some examples of common instances where information may require a quick turnaround:
As soon as possible:
Information for media inquiries
Emergency situations
High dollar value and key grants that have already been announced by the issuing agency when Community Relations Manager was not apprised in advance
Other examples:
Information tied to items going to Council that may be highlighted before the Council Meeting or after the Council takes action Special projects like road closures, traffic impacts, or special updates that the Community Relations Division has been directed to release with a quicker turnaround time
Media Contact
Departments should coordinate media-related communications with the Community Relations Manager as far in advance as feasible to allow time to draft, prepare, and obtain necessary information.
Examples of media-related items include:
Media inquiries should be directed to the Community Relations Manager as the City’s PIO or designee for information and interview coordination
Exception: Public safety personnel unless otherwise directed to work through the Community Relations Manager due to the emergent need to share information at all hours of the day Press Conferences and media coverage at events, including ribbon cuttings
Press Releases (releasing information) and Media Advisories (requesting attendance) are sent by the Community Relations team
Grant awards: The Community Relations Manager should be advised as soon as the Department is aware of an upcoming award, even if advised that the information is confidential, to allow adequate time for the release of information as soon as the State or Federal agency authorizes the release.
As a best practice, not every announcement should be a press release.
If you’re unsure if a press release (sent to the media directly) or a news release (widely shared) is appropriate, contact the Community Relations Division for guidance.
2 1
Social Media Management
The City’s social media accounts are managed by the Community Relations Division. Although departments have direct oversight and primary content management access, it is the responsibility of the Community Relations Manager to ensure that staff are maintaining a public image of the City that aligns with the values and brand of the City and follows best practices for social media communication. This includes messaging, public communication, and branding.
The Community Relations Manager’s social media role is to:
Ensure that all content posted on the City’s social media accounts adheres to the City’s adopted Social Media Policy
Conduct regular reviews of departmental social media accounts to ensure consistency with branding, messaging, and communication style
Provide guidance and training to staff on best practices for social media communication, including effective use of visuals, tone of voice, and engagement strategies
Maintain full administrative access to all social media accounts, including YouTube, NextDoor, LinkedIn and other less common and emerging social platforms
Open or create a new social media accounts approved by the City Manager or the Community Relations Manager to maintain full administrative access rights
Perform periodic audits to ensure social media accounts are not connected to individual, personal social media accounts Ensure all social media activities comply with relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards
Safeguard the City’s social media accounts from security breaches and unauthorized access
Accounts that are not in compliance with the Communication Strategy or the City’s social media policy within one month from being notified by the Community Relations Manager may be suspended or closed.
Any City social media account may be suspended/closed at any time at the direction of the City Manager, or department accounts may be suspended/closed at the direction of the Department Director. 2 2
Website
The Community Relations Manager plays a pivotal role in overseeing the City’s website to ensure clear, consistent, and accessible communication. While individual departments may manage their respective webpages, the Community Relations Manager ensures alignment with branding, messaging, and strategic communication objectives. The Community Relations Manager serves as the webmaster for the City of Salinas and will regularly review the website for content and accessibility and provide direction, guidance, and recommendations to staff to ensure the website is an effective tool for residents to access information.
Crisis Communication
As the City’s PIO, the Community Relations Manager serves as the lead PIO for the City during emergencies that lead or may lead to the activation of the City or County Emergency Operation Center. In this capacity, the Community Relations Manager will:
Ensure centralized coordination of crisis communication – The Community Relations Manager serves as the lead for emergency communication efforts, ensuring that messaging is timely, accurate, and aligned with the scale of the incident. Departments must keep the Community Relations Manager informed of
emerging crises to maintain consistency and coordination in public communication.
Adapt communication strategy based on incident scale – Crisis response requires flexibility in timing, tone, and outreach approach.
While some emergencies demand immediate public messaging, others require more measured communication to ensure clarity and prevent misinformation. Coordination across departments ensures that outreach is responsive, transparent, and appropriately scaled to the situation at hand.
Develop and maintain an emergency communication plan – The Community Relations Manager will create and maintain a Crisis Communication Plan that will guide communication processes in to ensure residents receive timely, accurate information during crises, with special consideration for language accessibility, digital inclusivity, and equity-focused outreach.
2 3
DEPARTMENTS
By fostering an open exchange of information and embracing communication best practices, departments play a vital role in strengthening community engagement and promoting transparency.
Departments serve as the primary source of information on City initiatives, programs, and services and play a crucial role in effective communication by ensuring timely, accurate, and consistent communication and engagement, and building relationships within the community. Each department is responsible for identifying key updates, projects, and public-facing information that may require outreach and engagement. To maximize the effectiveness of communication efforts, departments are responsible for:
Ownership of Departmental Communication: While the
Community Relations team leads citywide communication efforts, departments are responsible for day-to-day communication from the department. Staff should leverage the Communication Strategy to enhance their communication, outreach and
engagement efforts and rely on support from the Community Relations team to guide these efforts as needed. This includes managing departmental social media accounts, webpages, and other communications in alignment with established messaging guidelines.
Proactive Information Sharing: Departments should proactively provide updates to the community, ensuring key project
milestones, events, and initiatives are communicated early for strategic outreach.
Collaboration on Messaging: Departments should work
collaboratively with the Community Relations team if assistance is needed to refine messaging, ensuring consistency with branding and strategic goals.
Timeliness in Response: When information is requested, whether for media inquiries, council-related updates, or urgent matters, departments should prioritize a timely response to facilitate effective communication.
Accessibility and Inclusivity Considerations: Departments should ensure public communications consider accessibility, multilingual outreach, and culturally relevant messaging, reinforcing the City's commitment to inclusivity.
2 4
2 5
Social Media
All staff must adhere to the City’s
adopted Social Media Policy,
which can be found on the City’s
website, and work collaboratively
with the Community Relations
team to ensure compliance with
the Policy, the guidance in the
Communication Strategy, and
accessibility and other
regulations.
Accounts that are not in
compliance with the
Communication Strategy or the
City’s social media policy within
one month from being notified
by the Community Relations
Manager may be closed.
Website
Departments are responsible for
maintaining accurate and timely
information on their webpages.
While the Community Relations
Manager oversees website
management and ensures
alignment with branding and
strategic communication
objectives, departments should
proactively update their content
and collaborate as needed.
Regular coordination with the
Community Relations Manager
helps ensure accessibility, clarity,
and consistency, making the
website an effective resource for
residents.