Salinas City Council
February 24, 2026

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 580907

ENDORSEMENT
This endorsement, effective 12:O1 A.M. O4lOLl2O23 {orms a part of l. Your policy is amended to include either a Per Project General Aggregate Limit, a Per Location Geneial Aggregate Limit or a Per Project and Per Location General Aggregate Limit. Please select only one ol the {ollowing:
lxl Per Project General Aggregate Limit $ 2 ' 000 ' 000 [ ] Per Location General Aggregate Limit $
I I Per Project and Per Location General Aggregate Limit $ IF NEITHER OF THESE BOXES ARE CHECKED. THIS ENDORSEMENT IS VOID. IF MORE THAN ONE OF THE THESE BOXES ARE CHECKED, THIS ENDORSEMENT IS VOID. policy No.GL 534-20-18 issued to ST. FRANCIS ELECTRlc, LLc bvNATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE C0IIPANY 0F PITTSBURGH, PA THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY'

AMENDMENT OF LIMITS OF INSURANCE
(Per Project or Per Location Aggregate Limit)
This endorsement modifies insurance ptovided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVEBAGE FORM
ll. SECTION lll - LIMITS OF INSURANCE , is amended to include the following The Limits ol lnsurance and the rules below fix the most we will pay regardless of the number of:
a. lnsureds;
b. Claims made or "suits" brought; or
c. Persons or organizations making claims or bringing "suits".

2. The General Aggregate Limit is the most we will pay for the sum of:
1 a. Medical expenses under CoverageC;
b. Damages under Coverage A, except damages because of "bodily injury" or "property damage" included in the products-completed operations hazard"; and c. Damages under Coverage B'

3. The Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit is the most we will pay under coverage A for damages because of "bodily injury" and "property damage" included in the "products-completed operations hazard".

4. Subject to 2. above, the Personal and Advertising lniury Limit is the most we will pay under cor"r"g" B for the sum of all damages because of all "personal and advertising injury" sustained by any one person or organization.

5.Subjectto2.or3.above,whicheverapplies,theEachoccurrenceLimitisthemostwewill pay for the sum of:
a. Damages under Coverage A; and
b. Medical expenses under CoverageC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 581908
6 because of all "bodily injury" and "propeny damage" arising out of any one "occufrence". subject to 5. above, the Damage to premises Rented ro you Limit is the most we will pay under Coverage A because of "property damage,,to any one premises, while rented to you, or in the case of damage by rire, while rented to you or temporarily occupied by you withpermission ol the owner.

Subject to 5. above, the Medical Expense Limit is the most we will pay under Coverage C for all medical expenses because of "bodily injury', sustained by any one person.

Subject to 2., 4., 5., 6., and/or 7. above. the per project Aggregate Limit is the most wewill pay under Coverages A, B, and C combined for the sum of:
a. Damages under Coverage A;
b. Damages under CoverageB; and
c, Medical Expenses under CoverageC
arising out ol any single Project described above

9. Subject to 2., 4.,5,, 6., and/or 7. above, the per Location Aggregate Limit is the most wewill pay under Coverages A, B. and C combined for the sum of:
a, Damages under Coverage A;
b. Damages under Coverage B; and
c. Medical expenses under CoverageC
arising out of the any single Location described above
7 I
The Limits of lnsurance oI this coverage part apply separately to each consecutive annualperiod and to any remaining period oI less than 12 months, starting with the beginning ol thepolicy period shown in the Declarations, unless the policy period is extended after issuance for an additional period of less than 12 months. ln that case, the additional period will be deemedpart of the last preceding period lor purposes of determining the Limits of Insurance. lll. The Limits of lnsurance shown in the Declarations are deleted in their entirety and replaced by the Limits of lnsurance set forth below.

General Aggregate Limit
Each Occurrence Limit
Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit
Personal & Advertising lnjury Limit
Damage to Premises Rented to You
Medical Expense Limit
Per Project General Aggregate Limit, Per Location
General Aggregate Limit or Per
Project and Per Location General Aggregate Limit
Limits of lnsurance
$ t 0 ,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 4,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 500,000
$ 25,000
I 4,000,000
lV. SECTION V - DEFINITIONS, is amended to include the following:

23. "Location" means premises involving the same or connecting lots, or premises whoseconnection is interrupted only by a street, roadway, waterway, or right_of_way railroad.

All other terms and conditions oJ this policy remain the same. rssentative orre (in States Where

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 582909
COMI\4ERCIAL GENERAL LIABILIry
Policy # GL 534-20-18
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COI\iIMERCIAL GENERAL LIABlLlry COVERAGE PART
LIQUOR LIABILIry COVERAGE PART
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILIry COVERAGE PART
The following is added to the Other lnsurance
Condition and supersedes any provision to the
contrary[
Primary And Noncontributory lnsurance
This insurance is primary to and will not seek
contribution from any other insurance available
to an additional insured under your policy
provided that:
(1) The additional insured is a Named
lnsured under such other insurance: and
(2) You have agreed in writing in a contract
or agreement that this insurance would
be primary and would not seek
contributron ftom any other insurance
available to the additional insured.
cG 20 01 12 19 O lnsurance Services ffice' lnc., 2018 Page 1 of 1

PRIMARY AND NONCONTRIBUTORY -

OTHER INSURANCE CONDITION
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 583910
PoLICY NUMBER: GL 534-20-18 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY cG 24 17 10 01
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY - RAILROADS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE
(lf no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in theDeclarations as applicable to this endorsement.) With respect to operations perlormed for, or
affecting a Scheduled Railroad at a Designated
Job Site, the definition of "insured contract" in the
Oefinitions section is replaced by the following:

9. "lnsured Contract" means:
a. A contract lor a lease of premises. However,
that portion of the contract for a lease of
premises that indemniries any person or
organization lor damage by fire to premises
while rented to you or temporarily occupied
by you with permission oI the owner is not
an "insured contract";
b. A sidetrack agreement;
c. Any easement or license agreement;
d. An obligation, as required by ordinance, to
indemnify a municipality, except in
connection with work for a municipality;
e. An elevator maintenance agreement;
l. That part of any other contract or agreement
pertaining to your business (including an in-
demnification ol a municipality in connection
with work performed for a municipality)
under which you assume the tort liability of
another party to pay for "bodily injury" or
"property damage" to a third person or
organization. Tort liability means a liabilily
that would be imposed by law in the
absence of any contract or agreement.

Paragraph f. does not include that part of any
contract or agleement:
(1)That indemnifies an architect. engineer or su.-
veyor for injury or damage arising out of:
(a) Preparing, approving or failing to prepare or
approve maps, shop drawings, opinions, re-
ports, surveys, field orders, change orders
or drawings and specilications; or
(b) Giving directions or instructions, or failing to
give them. if that is the primary cause of the
injury or damage;
(2) Under which the insured, if an architect,
engineer or surveyor, assumes liability for an in-
jury or damage arising out of the insured's
rendering or failure to render professional
services. including those listed in paragraph (1)
above and supervisory, inspection, architectural
or engineering activities.

Scheduled Railroad:

ANY RAILROAD ORGANIZATION WHOI.I HAS
GRANTED YOU AN EASEI1ENT FOR ANY JOB
S I TE TO PERI1 I T YOU TO PERFORI.I WORK AS
A RESULT OF ANY CONTRACT OR AGREEI.IENT
YOU HAVE ENTERED INTO.

Designated Job Site:

O ISO Properties. lnc., 2OOOcG 24 17 10 01 Page 1ol 1 tr DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 584911
POLICY NUMBER: GL 534-20-18 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY cG 24 04 12 19

WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY
AGAINST OTHERS TO US (WAIVER OF SUBROGATION}
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

ELECTRONIC DATA LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

LIOUOB LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

POLLUTION LIABILITY COVERAGE PAHT DESIGNATED SITES

POLLUTION LIABILITY LIMITED COVERAGE PART DESIGNATED SITES

PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

RAILROAD PROTECTIVE LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

UNDEBGROUND STORAGE TANK POLICY DESIGNATED TANKS

SCHEDULE
The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Ot
Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of
Section lV - Conditions:

We waive any right of recovery against the
person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule
above because of payments we make under this
Coverage Part. Such waiver by us applies only to
the extent that the insured has waived its right of
recovery against such person(s) or organization(s)
prior to loss. This endorsement applies only to the
person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule
above.

PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE WRITTEN CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT YOU ENTER INTO Name Of Person(s) Or Organization(s):
uired to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations'lnformation req cG 24 04 12 19 Page 1ot 1O lnsurance Services Office, lnc., 2018 DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 585912
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached effective on the inception date of the policy unless a differentdate is indicated below. (Tho following "attaching clause' ne€d b€ comploted only wh€n this endors€menl is issued subsequont to pr€paration of the poticy).

This endorsement, effective 12:01 AM O4/OL/2O23 forms a part of policy No. WC OZZ-Z}-8334 lssued to ST. FRANCIS ELECTRtC, LLC
By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CottpANy oF p TTTSBURGH, pA.

LIMITED ADVICE OF CANGELLATION PROVIDED VIA E-MAIL

TO ENTITIES OTHER THAN THE NAMED INSURED
(WORKERS' COMPENSATION ONLY)
This policy is amended as follows:
ln the event that the lnsurer cancels this policy for any reason other than non-payment of premium, and

1. the cancellation effective date is prior to this policy,s expiration date;

2. the Named lnsured or, if applicable, any other employers named in ltem 1 of the lnformation page is under an existing contractual obligation to notify a certificate holder when this policy is canceled (hereinafter, the " Certificate Holde(s)") and the Named lnsured has provided to the lnsurer, either direcgy or through its broker of record, the email address of a contact at each such entity; and

3. the lnsurer received this information after the Named lnsured receives notice of cancellation of this policy and prior to this policy's cancellation effective date, via an electronic spreadsheel that is acceptable to the lnsurer, the lnsurer will provide advice of cancellation (the "Advice") via e-mail to each such Certificate Holders within 3Q days after the Named lnsured provides such information to the lnsurer; provided, however, that if a speciJic number of days is noi stated above, then the Advice will be provided to such Certificate Holde(s) as soon as reasonably practicable after the Named lnsured provides such information to the lnsurer.

Proof of the lnsurer emailing the Advice, using the information provided by the Fi6t Named lnsured, will serue as proof that the lnsurer has fully satisfied its obligations under this endorsement.

This endorsement does not affect, in any way, coverage provided under this policy or the cancellation of this policy or the effective date thereof, nor shall this endorsemenl invest any rights in any entity not insured under this policy.

The following deflnitions apply to this endorsement:

1. Named lnsured means the insured first named employer in ltem 1 of the Information Page of this policy.

2. Inaurer means the insurance company shown in the header on the lnformation Page of this policy.

All other terms, conditions and exclusions shall remain the same. $;qv('fr
wc 99 00 56
(Ed. 04/r r )

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 586913
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached effective on the inception date of the policy unless a different date is indicated below.
(The follolring "attaching clause' need be completed only when this eMorsement is issuod subsequent to prsparation ot the policy).

This endorsement, effective 12:01 AM 04loll2|23 forms a part of Policy No. WC 022-29-8334 lssued to ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC
By NATIONAL UNI0N FIRE INSURANCE COI.IPANY 0F PITTSBURGH, PA.

We have a right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against any person or organization with whom you have a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us, as regards any work you perform for such person or organization.

The additional premium for this endorsement shall be 2. 00 % of the total estimated workers compensation premium for this policy.
wc 04 03 6't
(Ed. 11/90)
Countersigned by
Authorized Representative

BLAN KET WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A95C326-1FAA-4942-9B98-0C7A503B0FC7 587914
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-032, Version: 1
..Title
Appropriation of $1,190,337 of HOME-American Rescue Plan Funds to the Housing Authority of Monterey County ..Recommended Action
Approve a Resolution authorizing the appropriation of $1,190,337 of HOME-American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) Funds to the Housing Authority of Monterey County to provide supportive services through rental assistance for qualifying HOME-ARP populations at the Fairview Homekey permanent supportive housing site located at 1030 Fairview Avenue.

City of Salinas Printed on 2/20/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
588

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2026
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: ORLANDO REYES, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
BY: KAYSHLA LOPEZ, HOMELESS SERVICES MANAGER
TITLE: APPROPRIATION OF $1,190,337 OF HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE

PLAN FUNDS TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MONTEREY
COUNTY

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing

1. The appropriation of $1,190,337 of HOME -American Rescue Plan (HOME -ARP) Funds to the Housing Authority of Monterey County to provide supportive services through rental assistance for qualifying HOME -ARP populations at the Fairview Homekey permanent supportive housing site located at 1030 Fairview Avenue,

2. The transfer of existing appropriation from 2931.30.3240 -69.1240 to 2931.30.3240 -

69.1680 in the amount of $1,190,337, and

3. The increase of estimated revenue for Fund 2931 to $2,485,337.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Approval of the appropriation of $1,190,337 of HOME-American Rescue Plan (HOME -ARP) Funds will enable the City to advance housing stability outcomes, comply with HUD expenditure and performance requirements, and ensure long -term service delivery. This appropriation is required to finalize and execute a Subrecipient Funding Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM) for the administration and delivery of rental assistance as part of supportive service activity designated to st abilize housing for qualifying individuals experiencing homelessness at the Fairview Homekey site (Fairview Homekey Project) for the term of February 24, 2026, through February 24, 2027.

BACKGROUND:

On March 21, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No. 22620, approving the City of Salinas HOME -ARP Allocation Plan, which prioritizes permanent supportive housing and the 589
Page | 2
provision of supportive services to people experiencing homelessness. Subsequently, on August 6, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 23054, allocating HOME-ARP and Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds to provide supportive services at the Fairview Homekey Project. Resolution No. 23054 also authorized City Manager and City Attorney to take action to make those funds available, authorizes City staff to take whatever additional action may be necessary to update the City’s HOME ARP Allocation Plan and PLHA program, and authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute additional resolutions as may be required by the State of California or HUD.

Project History and Change of Ownership
The Fairview Homekey property previously was owned under agreements with Shangri -La, Inc.

Following the foreclosure proceedings resulting from Shangri -La’s defaults, ownership of the property transitioned, and the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM) has since acquired the site and now serves as the sole property owner and operator. The City’s prior partnership with Shangri-La has been fully resolved.

As of January 23, 2026, the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM), is the sole property owner and operator for Fairview Homekey property and program operations. Acquisition and preservation of the Fairview Homekey site as permanent supportive housing, was supported by the Monterey County Board of Supervisors authoriz ing a one-time contribution of up to $2.5 million from the County Health Department Behavioral Health Bureau to HACM. This investment was matched by the Salinas City Council’s appropriation of Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) and Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) funds. This coordinated investment by the City, County, and HACM ensured the preservation of the Fairview Homekey site and avoided the loss of much-needed housing for highly vulnerable residents. The requested appropriation of HOME- ARP funds builds upon the City and County’s prior financial commitments toward the acquisition and preservation of the Fairview Homekey Project and represents the next phase of operation.

Fairview Homekey Project
The Fairview Homekey Project is a permanent supportive housing site developed through the State of California’s Homekey Program. The property consists of 4 5 studio units and one manager’s unit, all of which have been fully renovated and are move-in ready. The project serves individuals experiencing homelessness, including persons with mental illness and other complex health conditions, and is intended to prov ide long -term housing stability coupled with intensive supportive services.

Support services include case management and individualized service planning, housing stabilization and retention services, housing navigation and counseling, and referrals to behavioral health care, substance use treatment, healthcare, employment, and transportation services. All services will be delivered using a Housing First and low -barrier approach, ensuring that 590
Page | 3
participants are not screened out based on income, employment st atus, sobriety, or treatment history.

Community Engagement
In response to inquiries from nearby residents and businesses, the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey, in coordination with the City of Salinas, convened a community engagement meeting on February 19, 2026, at 6pm, at the Los Padres Elementary School. The purpose of the meeting was to provide information regarding the Fairview Homekey Project, clarify site operations and security protocols, and establish clear and appropriate points of con tact for community members to report concerns related to the property or its operations. The meeting will also provide an opportunity to explain the permanent supportive housing model, resident eligibility, and management structure for the site.

Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM)
The Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM) serves as the City’s primary housing partner for the Fairview Homekey Project. HACM as the property owner will be responsible for securing and administering operating subsidies (such as Housing Choice Vouchers when available), overseeing compliance with state and federal regulatory agreements tied to Homekey, HOME-ARP, and other funding sources. HACM is also responsible for coordina ting with the California State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on project approvals, operational feasibility, and long -term sustainability, as well as addressing any transactional or ownership issues that may arise. While the City provides policy direction, funding allocations, and regulatory oversight as a Participating Jurisdiction, HACM is responsible for the day-to-day operational viability of the Fairview Homekey Project and for resolving property-level or financing matters in coordination with HCD.

Service Provider Selection Process
Supportive services for the Fairview Homekey Project were procured by HACM through a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process issued on December 10, 2025. On January 26, 2026, the HACM Board of Commissioners approved the award of the supportive services contract to Step Up for the Fairview Homekey Project. The selected provider will deliver onsite supportive services in coordination with HACM and the City of Salinas, consistent w ith HOME -ARP requirements and the project’s Housing First model.

Grand Opening and Project Launch
The grand opening of the Fairview Homekey Project is anticipated to occur on March 4, 2026, concurrent with the ongoing lease-up of the site. The grand opening will mark the commencement of onsite supportive services and full program operations by HACM. Additional details regarding 591
Page | 4
the timing and format of the grand opening will be shared as project readiness milestones are finalized.

Performance, Reporting and Monitoring
The Housing Authority of the County of Monterey (HACM) is required to meet the performance outcomes identified in the approved Scope of Work . As part of the Scope of Work, HACM must enter client-level data into the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and comply with all applicable federal , state and local requirements. The City will conduct ongoing monitoring, including desk reviews and on -site reviews, to ensure program compliance and the timely expenditure of funds.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

No.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Funding for the first year of supportive services through rental assistance of the Fairview Homekey Project furthers the 2025-2028 City Council Strategic Plan Housing strategy of promoting the health and safety of unsheltered residents through housing and supportive services. Approval of this item will enable the City to advance housing stability outcomes, comp ly with HUD expenditure and performance requirements, and ensure long-term service delivery.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

This agenda item was prepared by the Community Development Department in Coordination with the City Attorney and Finance Department.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The recommended action authorizes the allocation of $1,190,337 in HOME -ARP funds for supportive services provided through rental assistance at the Fairview Homekey Project. There will be no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

592
Page | 5
Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
2931 30.3240-69.1240 Financial Assistance $2,485,337 ($1,190,337) 2931 30.3240-69.1680 Financial Assistance Housing
Authority
$0 $1,190,337
2931 30.3240-55.7521 Intergovernmental HOME
Invt Partnership (HUD)
$2,485,337

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution Authorizing the appropriation of HOME-ARP Funds

593
1 RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATION OF $1,190,337 OF HOME-

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUNDS TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF

MONTEREY COUNTY TO PROVIDE SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AT THE FAIRVIEW HOMEKEY SITE AT 1030 FAIRVIEW AVENUE

WHEREAS, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 established the HOME -American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to address homelessness and housing instability among qualifying populations; and

WHEREAS, The City of Salinas is a HUD-designated Participating Jurisdiction (PJ) under the HOME Program and HOME-ARP Program and is responsible for administering HOME-ARP funds in accordance with federal regulations; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22620 approving the City of Salinas HOME -ARP Allocation Plan, which prioritizes permanent supportive housing and supportive services for individuals and families experiencing homelessness; and

WHEREAS, on August 6, 2024 , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23054 allocating HOME-ARP and Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds to the Fairview Homekey permanent supportive housing project located at 1030 Fairview Avenue and authorizing the City Manager and the City Attorney to enter into any required agreements and to take any other action necessary to make allocated HOME ARP and PLHA funds available; and WHEREAS, the Fairview Homekey Project consists of 45 studio units and one manager’s unit and is intended to serve individuals experiencing homelessness, including persons with mental illness and other complex health conditions, through a Housing First and low -barrier service model; and
WHEREAS, as of January 23, 2026 , the Housing Authority of the County of Monte rey (HACM), is the sole property owner and operator for Fairview Homekey Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a HOME-ARP Subrecipient Funding Agreement with HACM to provide supportive services, including rental assistance, case management, housing stabilization, and related services for qualifying HOME-ARP populations residing at the Fairview Homekey Project; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Subrecipient Funding Agreement will provide HOME -ARP funds through a Subrecipient Agreement with HACM in an amount not to exceed $1,190,337 for the term of February 24, 2026 through February 24, 2027, subject to compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed action is not a project under the 594
2 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves the appropriation of $1,190,337 of HOME-American Rescue Plan (HOME -ARP) Funds to the Housing Authority of Monterey County to provide supportive services through rental assistance for qualifying HOME-ARP populations at the Fairview Homekey permanent supportive housing site located at 1030 Fairview Avenue.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves the transfer of existing appropriation from 2931.30.3240 -69.1240 to 2931.30.3240 -

69.1680 in the amount of $1,190,337 and the increase of estimated revenue for Fund 2931 to $2,485,337.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of February 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

______________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
595
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-049, Version: 1
..Title
All-Way STOP at California Street and East San Luis Street ..Recommended Action
Approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at California Street and East San Luis Street.

City of Salinas Printed on 2/20/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
596

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS, TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DIVISION FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: GERARDO RODRIGUEZ, ASSISTANT ENGINEER

ADRIANA ROBLES, CITY ENGINEER
TITLE: ESTABLISH ALL-WAY STOP AT CALIFORNIA STREET AND

EAST SAN LUIS STREET

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at California Street and East San Luis Street.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Staff received a request to install All-Way STOP signs at the intersection of California Street and East San Luis Street. The request was received following several collisions which occurred within a span of three to four months as well as a concern of students walking at this intersection to schools. All-Way STOPs are considered using a combination of quantitative and qualitativ e criteria. This intersection satisfies the qualitative criteria for an All-Way STOP and has a history of broadside collisions; therefore, staff is recommending approval of establishment of an All-Way STOP at California Street and East San Luis Street . The Traffic and Transportation Commission approved an alternate recommendation which includes striping on California Street. Staff do not support this alternate recommendation.

BACKGROUND:

In late 2023, staff received a request from a resident with neighborhood support to install All-Way STOP signs at the intersection of California Street and East San Luis Street. Staff performed a traffic analysis that utilizes a combination of quantitative and qualitative establishment criteria recommended by the California – Manual on Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD).

The CA-MUTCD states that in order for an all way stop condition to be warranted, the intersection should either have five or more reported correctable collisions in a 12 -month period or have an average of at least 300 vehicles per hour from t he major approach and 200 vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists per hour from the minor street approaches for an 8 -hour period of the day. The manual allows for reductions to these thresholds if the approach speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph. While this intersection does not satisfy the volume nor the specific crash history criteria 597
Page | 2
per Section 2B.07 04 of the CA -MUTCD, this intersection has a history of broadside collisions which are correctable by installation of an All-Way STOP.

The qualitative establishment criteria consider other contributing factors that may satisfy establishment criteria using engineering judgement. Factors analyzed in the qualitative analysis include elements such as land use generators (schools, business districts, etc.), g eometric conditions (blind curves, unimproved shoulders, etc.), and corridor planning measures (interim solution while large improvements are built). When considering the qualitative establishment criteria, this intersection satisfies this criterion given the proximity to a school bus pickup/drop off for Roosevelt Elementary School, the Salinas Child Development Center and pedestrian crossings for middle and high schools.

The Traffic and Transportation Commission

The recommendation to establish an All-Way STOP at the intersection of California Street and East San Luis Street was presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission at its January 8, 2026 meeting. The Commission voted on an amended motion which added striping California Street. The Commission voted (4-1) recommending City Council approve a Resolution to establish All-Way STOP at the intersection of California Street and E ast San Luis Street with the consideration of restriping California Street, as amended by Commission Dailey.

On October 14, 2025, the City Council approved the 2025 -2026 Prioritization of Restriping Projects. This staff report did not include California Street because this segment of California Street is considered a local street by both the City of Salinas and the California Department of Transportation. Consistent with CA -MUTCD recommendations, local streets are not required to provide centerline striping. Staff recommends the City Council approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at the intersection of California Street and East San Luis Street but do not support striping of California Street as recommended by the Traffic and Transportation Commission.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Categorical Exemption. The City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1) because the project proposes minor alteration of an existing public facilities.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE § 84308 APPLIES:

No.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This item supports City Council’s Vision and Strategic Goals of Public Safety and Infrastructure.

598
Page | 3
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Street Signs are installed and maintained by Public Works staff. Traffic enforcement is coordinated with the Police Department.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

No fiscal impacts are anticipated. Funds allocated to the Traffic division will be used by the Maintenance division for the installation of stop signs.

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution - California at San Luis All-Way Stop
Attachment 1: California Street at East San Luis Street Warrant Analysis Attachment 2: All-Way Stop Sign Plan Exhibit California at E San Luis 599
Page | 1

RESOLUTION NO. ______ (N.C.S.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY

STOP AT CALIFORNIA STREET AND EAST SAN LUIS STREET

WHEREAS, in 2023 the City received a request to install All -Way STOP sings at California Street and East San Luis Street; and

WHEREAS, the California Manual on Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) establishes quantitative and qualitative criteria for installation for stop signs, including All-Way STOP; and

WHEREAS, Staff conducted a traffic analysis and determined that although the intersection of California Street and East San Luis Street does to satisfy the criteria based on volume nor specific number of collisions, the intersection has a history of broadside colli sions which a correctable with the installation of an All-Way STOP; and

WHEREAS, the intersection of California Street and East San Luis Street s atisfies the qualitative establishment criteria given its proximity to a school bus pickup/drop off for Roosevelt Elementary School, the Salinas Child Development and pedestrian crossings for middle and high schools; and

WHEREAS, on January 8, 2026, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted (4-1) on an amended motion recommending the City Council approve a Resolution approving the establishment of an All-Way STOP at California Street and East San Luis Street with the consideration of restriping California Street; and

WHEREAS, this segment of California Street is a local street and is not required to be striped by the CA_MUTCD; therefore staff do not support striping of California Street as recommended by the Traffic and Transportation Commission; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the implementing of an All -Way STOP is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1). The project consists of the operation, repair, or minor alteration of public streets involving no expansion of use. There would be no significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at California Street and East San Luis Street.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of February 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

600
Page | 2

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
601
STOP Sign Applications(Two-Way STOP & Multi-Way STOP) Analysis Major Street:

Minor Street:

Study Dates:

A. Traffic Volume
vph
B. Restricted View
X Yes No
C. Crash History
Crash(es)
Crash(es)
A. Traffic Volume
Yes X No
B. Crash History
Crash(es)
C. Minimum Volumes
C1
C2
C3
85-th % Speed: MPH
85-th % Speed: MPH
Veh Peds Bikes Total Veh Peds Bikes Total Veh Peds Bikes Total Veh Peds Bikes Total 44 44 98 98 27 15 0 42 13 13 1 26
92 92 111 111 35 4 0 39 29 15 0 44
74 74 53 53 40 3 1 43 19 4 1 24
77 77 76 76 46 9 1 56 25 6 2 32
111 111 77 77 53 6 2 61 27 11 1 38
124 124 79 79 68 30 1 99 35 5 2 42
107 107 84 84 65 5 0 70 39 1 1 41
109 109 74 74 68 6 3 77 25 5 1 30
D. 80% Minimum Values
B. X Yes No
C.1 Yes X No
C.2 Yes X No
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Crash history satisfied to 80% of the minimum values
Major Street satisfied to 80% of the minimum values
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
8:00-9:00
3 Restricted View Exist
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Has a traffic signal warrant study been conducted for this intersection that recommends installation of a traffic control signal? If no, Interim Multi-Way Stop not recommended Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. (Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway) Reason: Parking on Major Street
5 California Street N/O East San Luis Street
California Street S/O East San Luis Street
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
7:00-8:00
Hours
Eastbound
East San Luis Street
Westbound
East San Luis Street
3 The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hours for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volumes warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.

Minor Street satisfied to 80% of the minimum values
Interim Multi-Way STOP?
32 California Street
East San Luis Street
5/21/2024-5/23/2024
Two-Way STOP Installation Criteria based on Guidance from California MUTCD 2014 Edition - Rev 7 (Section 2B.06 02) Multi-Way STOP Installation Criteria based on Guidance from California MUTCD 2014 Edition - Rev 7 (Section 2B.07 04) The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day(vph).

Northbound
California Street
Southbound
California Street
33 Satisfied
No
No
N/A
2105
602
A.

X Yes No
B.

X Yes No
C.

X Yes No
D.

Yes X No
Yes X No
X Yes No
Engineer's Stamp
Multi-Way STOP Analysis - Prepared by
Gerardo Rodriguez
Multi-Way STOP Analysis - Approved by
Adriana Robles, P.E.

CERTIFICATION:

This Multi-Way STOP Analysis was determined in accordance with the recommendations set forth by the California - Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - 2014 Edition - Rev 7 and approved by Adriana Robles, P.E., City Engineer.

Multi-Way Stop Installation recommended at California Street and East San Luis Street Major Street(Functional Class):

Minor Street(Functional Class):

Would the installation of a Multi-Way STOP improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection or the major street?
Locations near or adjacent to intersection that generate pedestrians.

Can the installation of the Multi-Way Stop eliminate vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at the intersection?
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:

Are left-turn collisions occurring?
The need for control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
California Street
East San Luis Street
Are there sight lines issues?
Locations
Roosevelt Elementary School (Bus Stop)
Salinas Child Development Center
Factors to consider in the Engineering Study for Multi-Way STOP Installation (Section 2B.07 05) 603
R1-3PISPIS
LL48 SF

SALINASCALIFORNIA N
PM"STOP" TYP
R1-3P
R1-1ISR1-3P
4" YELLOW STRIPE(50 FT) (TYP)R1-3PISPR1-1
LEGENDSHEET NOTESSHEET TOTALISPSIGN CHARTSTOPR1-1
DESIGNED BY:CAD BY:PROJECT ENGINEER / MANAGER:CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SUPERVISOR:CITY OF SALINASDATEREVISIONAPP.PROJ. NO(S)SHEET NO.FILE NO.OFFile Path:I:\PWTra\All-Way Stop Requests\California St @ E San Luis St\2024\Stop Sign Exhibit.dwgPlot By:GERARDO RODRIGUEZPlot Date:1/2/2026 2:33 PM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTDATEAPPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION:

REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CALIFORNIACIVILNO. 69142ADRIANA ROBLES ADRIANA ROBLES, P.E.CITY ENGINEER GERARDO RODRIGUEZGERARDO RODRIGUEZTBDADRIANA ROBLES, P.E.ALL WAY STOP INSTALLATIONTITLE SHEET-1-1 0020'40'SCALE: 1"=20'
ISITEM DESCRIPTIONQTYUNIT OFMEASURER1-3PALL WAY
604
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-051, Version: 1
..Title
All-Way STOP Request for North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street ..Recommended Action
Approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street.

City of Salinas Printed on 2/20/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
605

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS, TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DIVISION FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: GERARDO RODRIGUEZ, ASSISTANT ENGINEER

ADRIANA ROBLES, CITY ENGINEER
TITLE: ALL-WAY STOP REQUEST FOR NORTH MADEIRA AVENUE

AND ROOSEVELT STREET

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In 2023, staff received a request to install an All-Way STOP at the intersection of North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street. The request was received from concerns regarding collisions, senior centers adjacent to the intersection, and students walking at this intersection to school. All-Way STOPs are considered using a combination of quantitative and qualitative measures. This intersection satisfied the qualitative criterion due to its proximity to sensitive land use generators.

Staff concurs with the Traffic and Transportation Commission ’s recommendation to approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way Stop at North Maderia Avenue and Roosevelt Street.

BACKGROUND:

In mid-2023, staff received a request from a resident with neighborhood support to install All-Way STOP signs at the intersection of North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street. Staff performed a traffic analysis that utilizes a combination of quantitative and qualitati ve establishment criteria measures recommended by the California – Manual on Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

The CA-MUTCD states that in order for an all way stop condition to be warranted, the intersection should either have five or more reported correc table collisions in a 12 -month period or have an average of at least 300 vehicles per hour from the major approach and 200 vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists per hour from the minor street approaches for an 8 -hour period of the day. The manual also allow s for reductions to these thresholds if the approach speed on the major street exceeds 40mph. Staff conducted a stop warrant analysis and concluded that while this intersection did not satisfy the 8-hour volume criterion (the criterion was satisfied for only 3 hours), the traffic 606
Page | 2
volume on both the major and minor street are approximately equal and the intersection would improve traffic operations with the installation of an All-Way STOP.

The qualitative establishment criteria consider other contributing factors that may satisfy establishment criteria using engineering judgement. Factors analyzed i n the qualitative analysis include elements such as land use generators (schools, business districts, etc.), geometric conditions (blind curves, unimproved shoulders, etc.), and corridor planning measures (interim solution while large improvements are buil t). When considering the qualitative establishment criteria, this intersection satisfies this criterion given the intersection’s proximity to a school bus pickup/drop off, La Paz Park, senior center and pedestrian crossings for middle and high schools.

Traffic and Transportation Commission

The recommendation to establish an All-Way STOP at the intersection of North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street was presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission at its January 8, 2026 meeting. The Commission voted (5-0) recommending City Council approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at the intersection of North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Categorical Exemption. The City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1) because the project proposes minor alteration of an existing public facilities.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE § 84308 APPLIES:

No.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This item supports City Council’s Vision and Strategic Goals of Public Safety and Infrastructure.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

Street Signs are installed and maintained by Public Works staff. Traffic enforcement is coordinated with the Police Department.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

No fiscal impacts are anticipated. Funds allocated to the Traffic division will be used by the Maintenance division for the installation of stop signs.

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
607
Page | 3

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution - N Madeira and Roosevelt All-Way Stop Request Attachment 1: North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street Warrant Analysis Attachment 2: All-Way Stop Sign Plan Exhibit_ N Madeira and Roosevelt 608
Page | 1

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY

STOP AT NORTH MADEIRA AVENUE AND ROOSEVELT STREET

WHEREAS, in mid 2023 the City received a request to install All-Way STOP signs at North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street; and

WHEREAS, the California Manual on Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) establishes quantitative and qualitative criteria for installation for stop signs, including All-Way STOP; and

WHEREAS, Staff conducted a traffic analysis and determined that the intersection of North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street satisfied the qualitative criteria due to its proximity to school bus pickup/drop off, La Paz Park, senior centers and pedestrian crossings for middle and high schools; and

WHEREAS, on January 8, 2026 the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted ( 5-0) recommending the City Council approve a Resolution establishing an All-Way STOP at the intersection of North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street; and

WHEREAS, Staff recommends the approval of an all -way STOP application at the intersection of North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street; and

WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the implementing of an All -Way STOP is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1). The project consists of the operation, repair, or minor alteration of public streets involving no expansion of use. There would be no significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves a Resolution establishing an All -Way STOP at North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 24 day of February, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

609
Page | 2

APPROVED:

_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
610
STOP Sign Applications(Two-Way STOP & Multi-Way STOP) Analysis Major Street:

Minor Street:

Study Dates:

A. Traffic Volume
vph
B. Restricted View
X Yes No
C. Crash History
Crash(es)
Crash(es)
A. Traffic Volume
Yes X No
B. Crash History
Crash(es)
C. Minimum Volumes
C1
C2
C3
85-th % Speed: MPH
85-th % Speed: MPH
Veh Peds Bikes Total Veh Peds Bikes Total Veh Peds Bikes Total Veh Peds Bikes Total 101 101 103 103 62 3 65 52 2 54
114 114 106 106 85 4 89 52 4 55
118 118 93 93 91 6 97 55 5 60
131 131 131 131 104 4 108 67 10 77
163 163 161 161 147 7 154 82 29 111
179 179 192 192 171 6 177 79 10 89
167 167 172 172 170 8 178 79 10 89
131 131 142 142 157 4 161 60 4 64
D. 80% Minimum Values
B. X Yes No
C.1 Yes X No
C.2 Yes X No
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Crash history satisfied to 80% of the minimum values
Eastbound
Roosevelt Street
Westbound
Roosevelt Street
8 The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hours for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volumes warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.

Minor Street satisfied to 80% of the minimum values
Major Street satisfied to 80% of the minimum values
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
12:00-13:00
Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and North Madeira Avenue N/O Roosevelt Street
North Madeira Avenue S/O Roosevelt Street
North Madeira Avenue
Roosevelt Street
5/21/2024-5/23/2024
Two-Way STOP Installation Criteria based on Guidance from California MUTCD 2014 Edition - Rev 7 (Section 2B.06 02) Multi-Way STOP Installation Criteria based on Guidance from California MUTCD 2014 Edition - Rev 7 (Section 2B.07 04) The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day(vph).

Northbound
North Madeira Avenue
Southbound
North Madeira Avenue
11:00-12:00
Hours
8 Restricted View Exist
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

Has a traffic signal warrant study been conducted for this intersection that recommends installation of a traffic control signal? If no, Interim Multi-Way Stop not recommended A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. (Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or Reason: Parking on Major Street
9 35
Satisfied
No
No
N/A
3880
Interim Multi-Way STOP?
28 611
A.

X Yes No
B.

X Yes No
C.

X Yes No
D.

X Yes No
X Yes No
X Yes No
Engineer's Stamp
Multi-Way STOP Analysis - Prepared by
Gerardo Rodriguez
Multi-Way STOP Analysis - Approved by
Adriana Robles, P.E.

CERTIFICATION:

This Multi-Way STOP Analysis was determined in accordance with the recommendations set forth by the California - Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - 2014 Edition - Rev 7 and approved by Adriana Robles P.E..

Multi-Way Stop Installation recommended at North Madeira Avenue and Roosevelt Street Major Street(Functional Class):

Minor Street(Functional Class):

Would the installation of a Multi-Way STOP improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection or the major street?
Locations near or adjacent to intersection that generate pedestrians.

Can the installation of the Multi-Way Stop eliminate vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at the intersection?
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:

Are left-turn collisions occurring?
The need for control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
North Madeira Avenue
Roosevelt Street
Are there sight lines issues?
Locations
Sherwood Elementary School
La Paz Park
Senior Centers
Factors to consider in the Engineering Study for Multi-Way STOP Installation (Section 2B.07 05) 612
R1-3PISP
IS
LL44 SF

SALINASCALIFORNIA N
PM"STOP" TYP
R1-3P
R1-1ISR1-3P
4" YELLOW STRIPE(50 FT) (TYP)R1-3PISPR1-1
LEGENDSHEET NOTESSHEET TOTALISPSIGN CHARTSTOPR1-1
DESIGNED BY:CAD BY:PROJECT ENGINEER / MANAGER:CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SUPERVISOR:CITY OF SALINASDATEREVISIONAPP.PROJ. NO(S)SHEET NO.FILE NO.OFFile Path:I:\PWTra\All-Way Stop Requests\N Madeira Ave @ Roosevelt St\2024\Stop Sign Exhibit.dwgPlot By:GERARDO RODRIGUEZPlot Date:1/2/2026 3:25 PM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTDATEAPPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION:

REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CALIFORNIACIVILNO. 69142ADRIANA ROBLES ADRIANA ROBLES, P.E.CITY ENGINEER GERARDO RODRIGUEZGERARDO RODRIGUEZTBDADRIANA ROBLES, P.E.ALL WAY STOP INSTALLATIONTITLE SHEET-1-1 0020'40'SCALE: 1"=20'
ISITEM DESCRIPTIONQTYUNIT OFMEASURER1-3PALL WAY
613
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#25-507, Version: 1
..Title
City-Wide Parking Enforcement Agreement
..Recommended Action
Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a services agreement with LAZ Parking California, LLC for City-Wide Parking Enforcement Services in an amount not to exceed $1,949,175 through January 1, 2029 with and an option to extend the term for two (2) additional one-year periods.

City of Salinas Printed on 2/20/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
614

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: JENNY DAVILA, PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. SUPERVISOR
TITLE: CITY-WIDE PARKING ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a services agreement with LAZ Parking California, LLC for City-Wide Parking Enforcement Services in an amount not to exceed $1,949,175 through January 1, 2029 with and an option to extend the term for two (2) additional one-year periods.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Following a competitive procurement process, two proposals were received. LAZ Parking California, LLC (“LAZ”) submitted the most cost-efficient proposal to meet the needs of the City.

LAZ has partnered with the City for more than five years providing parking enforcement services and operational stability. LAZ has proposed the use of ALPR cameras that will improve current enforcement activities.

With the current process in place and the new proposed measures will enhance enforcement responsiveness allowing for more timely and accurate enforcement, expanded coverage in high - impact areas, and improve compliance, thus contributing to safer streets and improved access for residents, businesses, and visitors to the City of Salinas.

BACKGROUND:

The City has pro gressively modernized its parking enforcement approach since 2016, when it contracted with Serco, Inc. to supplement Police Department activities. In 2018, the service model was expanded to include evening and weekend coverage, addressing community needs a nd incorporating more flexible scheduling to reflect real use patterns.

In 2020, Serco, Inc. was acquired by LAZ KARP Associates, LLC and the City transitioned to a new agreement under the updated provider. Throughout this period, the program has offered responsive, demand-driven enforcement that relieves the Police Department of routine duties – allowing sworn staff to focus on higher-priority safety issues. 615
Page | 2

Parking Enforcement remains one of the City’s most frequently requested services, particularly in areas experiencing significant residential and commercial activity. The previous contract with LAZ expired in December 2025, prompting the release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) on October 13, 2025, for continued City-Wide Parking Enforcement Services.

Two proposals were submitted: one from 4-Leaf, Inc and one from LAZ Parking California, LLC.

After review of both proposals, City staff determined that LAZ submitted the most cost -efficient proposal while including new innovative approaches to the current parking enforcement structure offering strong value while maintaining established quality standards.

Currently under manual enforcement, officers generally review 30 -50 license plates per hour, depending on zone layout and walking conditions. Vehicle-mounted ALPR systems typically scan 600-1,200 plates per hour, allowing for broader and more consistent coverage without increasing staffing levels. LAZ states that there may be an initial increase in citations per hour during first deployment of the new syst em due to the identification of existing non -compliance rather than a change in the enforcement policy. Overtime citation volume stabilizes as compliance improves.

ALPR also improves accuracy and consistency. Automated plate capture reduces manual entry errors, which can lower citation void rates by 20-40%, and ensures every vehicle is reviewed using the same criteria. This supports a fair, uniform, and defensible e nforcement approach across all zones. The primary goal of the added ALPR is to improve efficiency, accuracy, and consistency, allowing LAZ to spend more time on confirmed violations and not plate verification.

To maintain uninterrupted enforcement, preserve institutional knowledge, and continue integrating technology and data into operations, City staff recommend approval of the new agreement for City-Wide parking Enforcement Services with LAZ Parking California, LLC with an annual not- to-exceed amount of $649,725.00.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

“Yes”

616
Page | 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The Agreement for City-Wide Parking Enforcement Services relates to the strategic goal of Public Safety.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Public Works Department coordinates with Police parking enforcement staff. Parking Enforcement services include coordination with Code Enforcement activities as well as with Street Maintenance services in regard to curb markings and signs.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

There is no impact to the General Fund. The Parking Enforcement Program is an enterprise account where the revenues offset the operating cost. Funding is appropriated and available for the remainder of the fiscal year. Future contract costs will be included in the upcoming bud get development process.

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
6803 50.5448-63.6010 Other Outside Services $702,086 $324,863

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Agreement – LAZ Parking California, LLC
Citywide Parking Enforcement RFP
LAZ Parking California, LLC Proposal

617
Page | 1

RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)

CITY-WIDE PARKING ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, On October 13, the City issued a call for proposals seeking innovative, city- wide parking enforcement solutions designed to improve efficiency, enhance customer service, and support the City’s long-term mobility goals, resulting in submissions from two qualified firms; and

WHEREAS, City staff conducted a comprehensive review of both proposals submitted by 4-Leaf, Inc. and LAZ Parking California, LLC, evaluating not only compl eteness and cost efficiency, but also each firm’s ability to leverage technology, streamline operations, and support continuous service improvements; and

WHEREAS, LAZ Parking California, LLC demonstrated the strongest combination of cost effectiveness, proven performance, and capacity to implement enhanced, technology -driven enforcement practices, and – having successfully provided these services under the current contract agreement – can ensure uninterrupted service with no transition period; and

WHEREAS, City staff selected LAZ Parking California, LLC as the best positioned vendor to partner with the City in advancing modernized, responsive, and future-oriented parking enforcement services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a services agreement with LAZ P arking California, LLC for City-Wide Parking Enforcement Services for a term of three (3) years with an option to extend for two (2) additional one-year periods, at an annual not-to-exceed amount of $649,725.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of February 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

618
Page | 2

ATTEST:

_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
619

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND LAZ PARKING CALIFORNIA, LLC.

City-Wide Parking Enforcement Services

THIS AGREEMENT is executed this 1st day of January 2026, (“Agreement” or “Contract”) between the City of Salinas, a California Charter city and municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”) and LAZ Parking California, LLC., a limited liability company (hereinafter “Contractor”).

IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Scope. Contractor hereby agrees to provide to the City, as the scope of services under this Agreement, the following services: City-Wide Parking Enforcement with additional ALPR camera system. Scope of work is further discussed in City-Wide Parking Enforcement Request for Proposal, Attachment B and Contractor’s Proposal dated 10/30/25, Attachment C.

2. Timeliness. Contractor shall perform all tasks in a timely fashion, as set forth more specifically in Section 3 below. Failure to so perform is hereby deemed a material breach of this Agreement, and City may terminate this Agreement with no further liability hereunder, or the city may agree in writing with Contractor to an extension of time.

3. Term. The work under this Agreement shall commence January 1, 2026, and shall be completed by January 1, 2029, unless City grants a written extension of time as set forth in Section 2 above.

4. Payment. City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept as full and fair consideration for the performance of this Agreement, an annual not-to-exceed amount of Six Hundred Forty-Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($649,725.00) as more fully described in title of Contractor’s fee schedule, Attachment C. Contractor has no right of reimbursement for expenses under this Agreement. Compensation shall become due and payable 30 days after City’s approval of Contractor’s submission of monthly written invoices to the City.

The payment of any compensation shall be contingent upon performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement to the satisfaction of the City. If City determines that the work set forth in the written invoice has not been performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, City shall not be responsible for payment until such time as the work has been satisfactorily performed.

5. Meet & Confer. Contractor agrees to meet and confer with City or its agents or employees with regard to services as set forth herein as may be required by City to insure timely and adequate performance of this Agreement.

6. Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance meeting the requirements specified in Attachment A hereto.

7. Indemnification. Contractor shall hold harmless, defend at its own expense, and Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 620837

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

indemnify City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against all liability, claims, damages, losses, and/or expenses including reasonable City attorney fees arising from all acts or omissions of Contractor or its officers, agents, or employees arising out of the performance of the work under this Contract, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, except where caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

8. Licensing. Contractor warrants that it is properly licensed to perform the work specified under this Agreement, including but not limited to possession of a current City business license.

9. Termination. City may terminate this Agreement upon ten days’ written notice. The amount of damages, if any, as a result of such termination may be decided by negotiations between the parties or before a court of competent jurisdiction.

10. Agency. In performing the services specified under this Agreement, Contractor is hereby deemed to be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of City.

11. Non-Assignability. The rights and obligations of Contractor hereunder are not assignable and cannot be delegated without written consent of City.

12. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any and all prior agreements, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter thereof. Any modification of the Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties hereto.

13. Validity. If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and may be signed in counterparts.

15. Laws. Contractor agrees that in the performance of this Agreement it will comply with all applicable State, Federal and local laws and regulations. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, County of Monterey, and City of Salinas.

16. Subject to Availability of Funds. In the event that the City Council, or other governing body, fails to appropriate or budget sufficient funds for the continuation of this agreement, or should funds become unavailable for any other reason, the City reserves the right to terminate this agreement upon written notice. This termination shall be effective as of the last day of the fiscal year for which funds were appropriated. Upon such termination, the Contractor will be Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 621838

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

limited to compensation for satisfactory services rendered up to the termination date.

17. Levine Act Disclosure Compliance (Cal Government Code Sec. 84308). Contractor hereby affirms and warrants that it has not contributed to the campaign of any elected or appointed City official an amount totaling more than $500 within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this Agreement, except as Contractor has disclosed within its Levine Act Disclosure Form submitted by Contractor to the City. Contractor agrees, that in the event it makes any contributions subject to the Levine Act’s disclosure requirements within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this Agreement, that it will file a Levine Act Disclosure Form (or Forms). Contractor acknowledges this duty of disclosure and that the City has made the Levine Act Disclosure Form(s) readily available on the City’s public internet site under Your Government / Transparency section for Contractor’s continuous compliance.

18. Electronic Execution of Agreement. The words “execution,” “signed,” “signature,” and words of like import in this Agreement and shall be deemed to include electronic signatures or electronic records (including, without limitation, DocuSign and AdobeSign), each of which shall be of the same legal effect, validity, enforceability, and admissibility as a handwritten signature.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is entered into by the parties hereto on the day and year first written above.

CITY OF SALINAS

__________________________________
René Mendez, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________________
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney, or
Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney

CONTRACTOR:

LAZ Parking California, LLC.

___________________________________
Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 622839

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

By (Printed Name): ___Mike Kuziak______

Its (Title): ___Chief Operating Officer_____

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 623840

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Attachment A

Insurance Requirements

Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, and for three years thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, his/her/its officers, agents, representatives, employees, and/or subcontractors.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (“CGL”): Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an occurrence basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO Form CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form CA 0001 covering Code 1 (any auto), with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employers’ Liability insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

4. Contractors’ Pollution Legal Liability and/or Asbestos Legal Liability and/or Errors and Omissions (if project involves environmental hazards): with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate, on an annual basis.

If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the Contractor requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the Contractor shall cause the insurer to reduce or eliminate such self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 624841

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

or on behalf of the Contractor. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).

2. For any claims related to this project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted by Contractor to the City.

5. If the services involve lead-based paint or asbestos identification/remediation, the Contractor’s Pollution Liability policy shall not contain lead-based paint or asbestos exclusions. If the services involve mold identification/remediation, the Contractor’s Pollution Liability policy shall not contain a mold exclusion, and the definition of Pollution shall include microbial matter, including mold.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors.

Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including an additional insured endorsement and all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins.

However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, required by these specifications, at any time.

Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage subcontractors shall provide coverage with a form at least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.

Maintenance of Insurance
Maintenance of insurance by Contractor as specified shall in no way be interpreted as relieving Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 625842

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Contractor of its indemnification obligations or any responsibility whatsoever and the Contractor may carry, at its own expense, such additional insurance as it deems necessary.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 626843

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Attachment B

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 627844

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 628845

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 629846

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 630847

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 631848

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 632849

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 633850

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 634851

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 635852

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 636853

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 637854

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 638855

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 639856

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 640857

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 641858

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 642859

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 643860

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 644861

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 645862

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 646863

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 647864

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 648865

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 649866

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 650867

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 651868

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 652869

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 653870

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 654871

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 655872

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 656873

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 657874

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 658875

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 659876

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 660877

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 661878

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 662879

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 663880

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Attachment C

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 664881

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 665882

Agreement for Services v. January 2026
LAZ Parking California, LLC.

Jan 2026

Docusign Envelope ID: 6F88099B-2CD3-47AF-9732-66FFA36DCD0B 666883
1 | Page

Public Works Department

Request for Proposal (RFP) for Professional
Services
City-Wide Parking Enforcement

RFP Issued: Monday, October 13, 2025

Submit Written Questions regarding RFP: 2:00 p.m.

Friday, October 17, 2025

RFP submittal deadline: 2:00 p.m.

Friday, October 24, 2025
Contact: Jenny Davila
Public Works Admin. Supervisor

CITY OF SALINAS

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL MAINTENANCE
426 WORK STREET
SALINAS, CA 93901

667
2 | Page

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

TITLE: CITY-WIDE PARKING ENFORCEMENT

1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Salinas is seeking proposals from qualified firms to provide services for efficient and professional parking enforcement operations citywide and wishes to engage these services without incurring capital outlay or adding City employees. Therefore, the city is seeking proposals from organizations that can provide Parking Enforcement Services. The City is seeking a multi -year contract with a qualified, professional and highly motivated firm or consortium to perform daily parking enforcement services. The required services and performance conditions are described in the Scope of Work (or Services).

2. ATTACHMENTS
The attachments below are included with this Request for Proposals (RFP) for your review and submittal (see asterisk):

Attachment A – Proposer’s Information Form*
Attachment B – Scope of Work/Services
Attachment C – Sample Agreement for Professional Services Attachment D – Sample Table, Qualifications of Firm Relative to City’s Needs* Attachment E – Cost Proposal Format*

The items identified with an asterisk (*) shall be filled out, signed by the appropriate representative of the company and returned with submittal.

3. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

3.1 Examination of Proposal Documents

The submission of a proposal shall be deemed a representation and certification by the Proposer that they:

3.1.1 Have carefully read and fully understand the information that was provided by the City to serve as the basis for submission of this proposal.

3.1.2 Have the capability to successfully undertake and complete the responsibilities and obligations of the proposal being submitted.

3.1.3 Represent that all information contained in the proposal is true and correct.

3.1.4 Did not, in any way, collude, conspire to agree, directly or indirectly, with any person, firm, corporation or other Proposer in regard to the 668
3 | Page
amount, terms or conditions of this proposal.

3.1.5 Acknowledge that the City has the right to make any inquiry it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information supplied by Proposer, and Proposer hereby grants the City permission to make these inquiries, and to provide any and all related documentation in a timely manner.

No request for modification of the proposal shall be considered after its submission on grounds that Proposer was not fully informed to any fact or condition.

3.2 Addenda/Clarifications

Should discrepancies or omissions be found in this RFP or should there be a need to clarify this RFP, questions or comments regarding this RFP must be put in writing and submitted on Planetbids no later than 2:00 p.m., Friday, October 17, 20 25. All Co mmunications regarding this RFP, including all questions, should be submitted through the Q&A section of the project page (on PlanetBids). The City will respond to all questions submitted prior to the communication deadline. All addenda shall become a part of this RFP and shall be acknowledged on the Proposer’s Form.

The City shall not be responsible for nor be bound by any oral instructions, interpretations or explanations issued by the City or its representatives.

3.3 Submission of Proposals

All proposals shall be submitted electronically on the PlanetBids project page. Proposals must be received no later than 2:00 p.m. on Friday, October 24, 2025. All proposals received after that time will be rejected for non-compliance. Proposal should bear Proposer’s name and address, clearly marked, “RFP – City-Wide Parking Enforcement”.

3.4 Withdrawal of Proposals

A Proposer may withdraw its proposal at any time before the expiration of the time for submission of proposals as provided in the RFP by emailing the City Project Manager for a request to withdrawal signed by, or on behalf of, the Proposer.

3.5 Rights of the City of Salinas

This RFP does not commit the City to enter into a contract, nor does it obligate the City to pay for any costs incurred in preparation and submission of proposals or in anticipation of a contract. The City reserves the right to:
669
4 | Page
• Make the selection based on its sole discretion;
• Reject any and all proposals;
• Issue subsequent Requests for Proposals;
• Postpone opening for its own convenience;
• Remedy technical errors in the Request for Proposals process; • Approve or disapprove the use of particular subconsultants; • Negotiate with any, all or none of the Proposers;
• Accept other than the lowest offer;
• Waive informalities and irregularities in the Proposals and/or • Enter into an agreement with another Proposer in the event the originally selected Proposer defaults or fails to execute an agreement with the City.

An agreement shall not be binding or valid with the City unless and until it is executed by authorized representatives of the City and of the Proposer.

4. PROPOSED TENTATIVE TIMELINE
The tentative RFP timeline is as follows:

RFP Issued Monday, October 13, 2025
Deadline for questions, clarifications 2:00 p.m., Friday, October 17, 2025 Proposals Due 2:00 p.m., Friday, October 24, 2025
Interviews (if needed) Week of October 27, 2025
Proposal Selection and Contract Preparation Week of November 2, 2025 Contract Awarded November 2025 (tentative)
Work Commences December 2025 (tentative)

5. INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED (to be submitted in this order only) These instructions outline the guidelines governing the format and content of the proposal and the approach to be used in its development and presentation. The intent of the RFP is to encourage responses that clearly communicate the Proposer’s understanding of the City’s requirements and its approach to successfully provide the products and/or services on time and within budget.

Only that information which is essential to an understanding and evaluation of the proposal should be submitted. Items not specifically and explicitly related to the RFP and proposal, e.g. brochures, marketing material, etc. will not be considered in the evaluation.

All proposals shall address the following items in the order listed below and shall be numbered 1 through 8 in the proposal document.

5.1 Section 1 – Proposal Summary

This Chapter shall discuss the highlights, key features and distinguishing points of the Proposal. A separate sheet shall include a list of individuals and 670
5 | Page
contacts for this Proposal and how to communicate with them. Limit this Chapter to a total of three (3) pages including the separate sheet.

5.2 Section 2 – Profile on the Proposing Firm(s)

This Chapter shall include a brief description of the Prime Proposer’s firm size as well as the proposed local organization structure. Include a discussion of the Prime Proposer firm’s financial stability, capacity and resources. Include all other firms participating in the Proposal, including similar information about the firms.

Additionally, this section shall include a listing of any lawsuit or litigation and the result of that action resulting form (a) any public project undertaken by the Proposer or by its subcontractors where litigation is still pending or has occurred within the last five years or (b) any type of project where claims or settlements were paid by the consultant or its insurers within the last five years.

5.3 Section 3 – Qualifications of the Firm

This Chapter shall include a brief description of the Proposer’s and sub- Proposer’s qualifications and previous experience on similar or related projects. Provide in a table format (see Sample Table, Attachment D) descriptions of pertinent project experience with other public municipalities and private sector that includes a summary of the work performed, the total project cost, the percentage of work the firm was responsible for, the period over which the work was completed, and the name, title, and phone number of client’s to be contacted for references. Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project.

This chapter shall include information regarding any relationships with firms and/or individuals who may submit proposals in response to the RFPs being developed.

5.4 Section 4 – Work Plan or Proposal

This Chapter shall present a well -conceived service plan. Include a full description of major tasks and subtasks. This section of the proposal shall establish that the Proposer understands the City’s objectives and work requirements and Proposer’s ability to satisfy those objectives and requirements. Succinctly describe the proposed approach for addressing the required services and the firm’s ability to meet the City’s schedule, outlining the approach that would be undertaken in providing the requested services.

5.5 Section 5 – Proposed Innovations
This Chapter shall discuss Proposers technical or procedural innovations that have been used successfully on other engagements, and which may provide 671
6 | Page
the City with better service delivery. In section should discuss any ideas, innovative approaches, or specific new concepts included in the Proposal that would provide benefit to the City.

5.6 Section 6 – Project Staffing

This Chapter shall discuss how the Proposer would propose to staff this project. Key project team members shall be identified by name, title and specific responsibilities on the project. An organizational chart for the project team and resumes for key Proposer personnel shall be included. Key personnel will be an important factor considered by the review committee.

Changes in key personnel may be cause for rejection of the proposal.

5.7 Section 7 – Proposal Exceptions
This Chapter shall discuss any exceptions or requested changes that Proposer has to the City’s RFP conditions, requirements and sample contract. If there are no exceptions noted, it is assumed the Proposer will accept all conditions and requirements identified in the Attachment C – “Sample Agreement for Services.” Items not excepted will not be open to later negotiation.

5.8 Section 8 – Proposal Costs Sheet and Rates

The fee information is relevant to a determination of whether the fee is fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided. Provision of this information assists the City in determining the firm’s understanding of the project, and provides staff with tools to negotiate the cost, provide in a table (See Table, Attachment E).

Consultant shall provide the following information

5.8.1 Direct labor rates for proposed staff;

5.8.2 Overhead rate and breakdown of overhead elements;

5.8.3 Subconsultant billing rates and mark-up percentage for ODC’s (other direct costs); and identify all reimbursable expenses.

Most recent complete financial instrument that would establish Proposer’s ability to complete the obligations of the contract resulting from this solicitation. Proposers need to submit their last two audited financial statements (e.g., balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flow).

This Chapter shall include the proposed costs to provide the services desired. Include any other cost and price information, plus a not -to-exceed amount, that would be contained in a potential agreement with the City. The hourly rates may be used for pricing the cost of additional services outlined in the Scope of Work.

672
7 | Page
PLEASE NOTE: The City of Salinas will not pay for services before it receives them. Therefore, do not propose contract terms that call for upfront payments or deposits.

6. CONTRACT TYPE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
It is anticipated that the agreement resulting from this solicitation, if awarded, will be a not-to-exceed budget per task form of contract. Contract term shall be three years (3) with an opportunity to extend two additional one (1) year terms. A Sample Agreement for Professional Services is provided as Attachment C. The method of payment to the successful Proposer shall be on a per task basis with a maximum “not to exceed” fee as set by the Proposer in the proposal or as negotiated between the Proposer and the City as being the maximum cost to perform all work. This figure shall include direct costs and overhead, such as, but limited to, transportation, communications, subsistence and materials and any subcontracted items of work.

Progress payments will be based on a percentage of project completed.

Proposers shall be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of the Agreement, including Insurance Requirements in Attachment C. If a Proposer desires to take exception to the Agreement, Proposer shall provide the following information in Section 7 of their submittal package. Please include the following:

• Proposer shall clearly identify each proposed change to the Agreement, including all relevant Attachments.
• Proposer shall furnish the reasons for, as well as specific recommendations, for alternative language.

The above factors will be taken into account in evaluating proposals. Proposals that take substantial exceptions to the proposed Agreement may be determined by the City, at its sole discretion, to be unacceptable and no longer considered for award.

Insurance Requirements

The selected Proposer(s), at Proposer’s sole cost and expense and for the full term of the Agreement or any extension thereof, shall obtain and maintain, at a minimum, all of the insurance requirements outlined in Attachment C.

All policies, endorsements, certificates and/or binders shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Attorney.

The selected Proposer agrees to provide the City with a copy of said policies, certificates and/or endorsement upon award of contract.

7. REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS
City staff will evaluate the proposals provided based on the following criteria:

7.1 Cost of services;
673
8 | Page

7.2 References from similar programs, indicating that contractor has performed services professionally with a positive impact on the community;

7.3 Training program;

7.4 Experience;

7.5 Level of customer service;

7.6 Implementation Plan;

A selection committee will make a recommendation to the City Council. The acceptance of the proposal will be evidenced by written Notice of Award from the City Public Works Department to the successful Proposer after Council approval.

8. ORAL INTERVIEWS
Proposers may be required to participate in an oral interview. The oral interview will be a panel comprised of members of the selection committee.

Proposers may only ask questions that are intended to clarify the questions that they are being asked to respond.

Each Proposer’s time slot for oral interviews will be determined randomly.

Proposers who are selected shall make every effort to attend. If representatives of the City experience difficulty on the part of any Proposer in scheduling a time for the oral interview, it may result in disqualification from further consideration.

9. PUBLIC NATURE OF MATERIALS
Responses to this RFP become the exclusive property of the City of Salinas. All proposals received in response to this RFP becomes a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public records, with the exception of those elements in each proposal which are defined by the Proposer as business or trade secrets and plainly marked as “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary”. The City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such proposal or portions thereof, if they are not plainly marked as “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary” or if disclosure is required under the Public Records Act. Any proposal which contains language purporting to render all or significant portions of the proposal “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary” shall be regarded as non-responsive.

Although the California Public Records Act recognizes that certain confidential trade secret information may be protected from disclosure, the City of Salinas may not accept or approve that the information that a Proposer submits is a trade secret. If a request is made for information marked “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary,” the City shall provide the Proposer who submitted the information with reasonable notice to allow the Proposer to seek protection from disclosure by a court of competent jurisdiction.

10. COLLUSION
674
9 | Page
By submitting a proposal, each Proposer represents and warrants that its proposal is genuine and not a sham or collusive or made in the interest of or on behalf of any person not named therein; that the Proposer has not directly induced or solicited any other person to submit a sham proposal or any other person to refrain from submitting a proposal; and that the Proposer has not in any manner sought collusion to secure any improper advantage over any other person submitting a proposal.

11. DISQUALIFICATION
Factors such as, but not limited to, any of the following may be considered just cause to disqualify a proposal without further consideration:

11.1 Evidence of collusion, directly or indirectly, among Proposers in regard to the amount, terms or conditions of this proposal;

11.2 Any attempt to improperly influence any member of the evaluation team;

11.3 Existence of any lawsuit, unresolved contractual claim or dispute between Proposer and the City;

11.4 Evidence of incorrect information submitted as part of the proposal;

11.5 Evidence of Proposer’s inability to successfully complete the responsibilities and obligation of the proposal; and

11.6 Proposer’s default under any previous agreement with the City, which results in termination of the Agreement.

12. NON-CONFORMING PROPOSAL
A proposal shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the provisions of these RFP instructions and specifications. Any alteration, omission, addition, variance, or limitation of, from or to a proposal may be sufficient grounds for non- acceptance of the proposal, at the sole discretion of the City.

13. GRATUITIES
No person shall offer, give or agree to give any City employee any gratuity, discount or offer of employment in connection with the award of contract by the city. No city employee shall solicit, demand, accept or agree to accept from any other person a gratuity, discount or offer of employment in connection with a city contract.

14. FIRMS OR PERSONS NOT ELIGIBLE TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL
In order to avoid any conflict of interest or perception of a conflict of interest, Proposer(s) selected to provide professional services under this RFP will be subject to the following requirements:

675
10 | Page

14.1 The Proposer(s) who works on the procurement will be precluded from submitting proposals or bids as a prime contractor or subcontractor in the ultimate procurement.

14.2 The Proposer(s) may not have interest in any potential Proposer for the ultimate procurement.

676
11 | Page

677
12 | Page

678
13 | Page

679
14 | Page

680
15 | Page
Attachment A
Proposer’s Information Form

PROPOSER (please print):

Name:

Address:

Telephone: Email:

Contact person, title, email, and telephone:

Proposer, if selected, intends to carry on the business as (check one):

 Individual  Joint Venture
 Partnership

 Corporation

When incorporated?
In what state?
When authorized to do business in California?

 Other (explain):

ADDENDA
To assure that all Proposers have received each addendum, check the appropriate box(es) below. Failure to acknowledge receipt of an addendum/addenda may be considered an irregularity in the Proposal:

Addendum number(s) received: 1;
2; 3; 4; 5; 6;
Or _No Addendum/Addenda Were Received (check and initial).

681
16 | Page
PROPOSER’S SIGNATURE
No proposal shall be accepted which has not been signed in ink in the appropriate space.

682
17 | Page
Attachment A – Proposer Information continued…

1. If Proposer is INDIVIDUAL, sign here:

Date:

Proposer’s Signature

Proposer’s typed name and title

2. If Proposer is PARTNERSHIP or JOINT VENTURE; at least t w o (2) Partners shall sign here:

Partnership or Joint Venture Name (type or print)
Date:

Member of the Partnership or Joint Venture signature
Date:

Member of the Partnership or Joint Venture signature

3. If Proposer is a CORPORATION, the duly authorized officer shall sign as follows: The undersigned certify that he/she is respectively:
and
Signature Title
Of the corporation named below; that they are designated to sign the Proposal Cost Form by resolution (attach a certified copy, with corporate seal, if applicable, notarized as to its authenticity or Secretary’s certificate of authorization) for and on behalf of the below named CORPORATION, and that they are authorized to execute same for and on behalf of said CORPORATION.

Corporation Name (type or print)
By: Date:

Title:

City of Salinas – Parking Enforcement RFP

683
18 | Page
ATTACHMENT B – SCOPE OF WORK

Project Background:

The City of Salinas desires efficient and professional parking enforcement operations citywide which includes the city’s commercial districts, residential permit parking program, schools, street sweeping restrictions, and parking restrictions and wishes to engage these services without incurring capital outlay or adding City employees.

Therefore, the city is seeking proposals from organizations that can provide Parking Enforcement Services with the goal to increase parking citation issuance. The City is seeking a multi-year contract with a qualified, professional and highly motivated firm or consortium to perform daily permit parking enforcement services. The selected provider shall work with the City’s Citation Processing and Administrative Review contractor, including provision of compatible equipment with their systems.

Description of Project:

The City of Salinas seeks to further enhance the effectiveness of its downtown parking management program, which encompasses several city-operated parking lots and two parking garages. The City is pleased with the progress achieved under its current parking management provider and is now inviting proposals that will build upon this success to deliver innovative, efficient, and cost -effective parking management solutions. The City aims to improve revenue collection through effective citation issuance and enforcement practices, while continuing to strengthen on -street parking management in its commercial areas and within the existing residential permit parking district near one of its major hospitals. In addition, the City anticipates expanding enforcement efforts in school zones during pick -up and drop -off times and implementing new parking restrictions to support street sweeping operations.

The attached maps show commercial areas throughout the City and the location of the residential permit parking program.

The commercial or business districts generally have 2- hour parking. However, certain street segments may have 20- minute zones to 90- minute zones as well as reverse parking zones.

Term of Contract shall be for three (3) years with an opportunity to extend for two additional one (1) year terms.

684
19 | Page
Scope of Services

Contract Parking Enforcement personnel will provide enforcement services citywide, issuing parking citations to violators. The chosen contractor is expected to provide all equipment needed for enforcement operation, including but not limited to vehicles, handheld devices for uploading citation information, license plate readers, uniforms , and company issued photo identification cards . Said equipment shall be compatible with systems of the City’s citation processing contractor, Parking Management Bureau (PMB).

Issuance of Parking Citations

The contractor’s staff will be responsible for issuing citations for parking permit violations citywide. Citations must include the make, model, color, and style of vehicle, license tag number or Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), violation code number and description, base fine amount and additional fine amount in the event there is a failure to respond timely, badge number, the location of the parking offense, type of offense (e.g. permit incorrectly displayed, no valid permit, not parked in the right location) and the time and date of the offense. The contractor should supply handheld ticket writers which are capable of capturing digital photos and voice recordings associated with a violation. If a manual paper citation is used, it will be filled out in a complete and legible manner. All citations must be placed on the windshield of the offending vehicle, as required by the California vehicle code. The Contractor is required to provide handheld devices, ticket writer ticket stock, envelopes, and manual citation books.

The City would like the vendor to perform all enforcement services, but for citation processing and payments to occur via the City’s existing citation management vendor and the revenue collections division in the City’s Finance Department.

The Contractor is required to supply all vehicles needed and will be responsible for all on- going operating expenses including insurance, fuel, maintenance, and repairs. All vehicles used by enforcement shall be clearly identifiable as performing parking enforcement for the City. Vehicle markings shall indicate the operator is a private company authorized to provide services in the City of Salinas. Marking and color should distinguish Contractor’s vehicles from official City vehicles, and the vehicle markings must be approved by the City Manager and the Chief of Police or his/her designee. Parking enforcement and parking meter operations staff shall operate all vehicles at all times in compliance with all state and local motor vehicle and emissions laws. Vehicles shall not have missing parts or dents, and the rear of all patrol vehicles shall have a sign warning of frequent vehicle stops. All vehicles used by Contractor’s personnel shall have blinking flasher lights installed on each vehicle's roof.

685
20 | Page
Personnel
The firm selected for the contract, and all of its personnel, should demonstrate an exceptional familiarity with parking enforcement rules and regulations, laws, statues, ordinances, policies, parking program technologies and management as well as hearing procedures. Most importantly, the firm chosen should demonstrate a superior understanding of operational requirements, public relations, and customer service practices.

The contractor will be responsible for all aspects of recruitment, selection, and initial and on- going training of parking enforcement personnel, so the contractor shall employ only persons competent and skilled and shall provide responsible supervision for each individual employed. The contract service provider shall not use discriminatory hiring practices in regard to ethnic origin, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, and physical or mental disability. The contractor must adhere to all existing Government Code and City nondiscrimination policies, and the contractor’s personnel shall at all times be polite and courteous to all citizens and City staff. The contractor’s personnel shall be required to speak and write and communicate effectively to the City’s customers, residents and visitors and bilingual skills are recommended to better serve the City’s Spanish speaking community. The contractor will be responsible for assuring employee compliance with all laws and regulations, responding to inspections/audits by regulatory agencies, and paying any fines or assessments levied by regulatory agencies. In addition, the contract service provider will be responsible for all personnel supervision, discipline, and termination actions.

However, the City may require the removal of any Contractor’s personnel, when it is determined to be in the best interest of the City, at any time.

The contractor must provide a thorough background investigation on all potential employees, including but not limited to criminal/driving history, outstanding violations, polygraph and/or psychological exams, medical history, prior work issues and a skills assessment test. As the individuals selected for the process will be representing the City of Salinas on a day -to-day basis, the selection criteria are expected to be stringent. Employees should also be interviewed by City of Salinas staff prior to approval.

All personnel are to be provided with professional appearing uniforms, badges, and ID tags. Logos should appear on shirt and jacket sleeves, and hats should have an emblem designating them as official RPP parking enforcement personnel. The City must approve the color and design of uniforms, and it is important that uniformed personnel shall not resemble a City of Salinas Police Department uniform. All personnel are to be in complete uniform at any time during duty hours including time in court and must carry a company-issued photo identification at all times.

686
21 | Page
The contractor shall be responsible for the conduct, demeanor, and appearance of all employees. All employees shall act in a courteous and respectable manner while on duty, and during any interactions with the public. The City of Salinas seeks to maintain the highest level of customer service, and employees must be attentive, alert, and responsive when dealing with customers’ issues, needs, or complaints. As may be occasionally required, the contract service provider will be responsible for having their employees appear in court, on -time, and prepared to testify on parking- related cases in a professional manner.

Training

The contractor will provide reasonable and necessary training to their employees who work for the City, relevant to their respective job duties. The training program should provide the Contractor’s personnel with sufficient understanding of the RPP District as well as operation of required equipment and enforcement protocol. All personnel are to complete and pass the training course prior to starting service, and the training procedures must be approved by the City.

The contractor shall maintain complete training records for each employee, as well as any other records prescribed by law or City policy as appropriate. The training must include, but is not limited to, the following:

Enforcing permit violations by the issuance of citations • Marking and tagging of vehicles
• Responding to calls for service
• Customer service delivery and expectations
• Conflict resolution management
• City Municipal code, state statute, and ordinances relating to parking enforcement and related activities
• Giving testimony and courtroom procedures
• Job procedures and emergency protocol
• Job safety
• Civil rights law and procedures
• Job procedures and emergency protocols

The Contractor shall select and hire only persons who are well-qualified to perform the duties for their respective job positions and should provide classifications of all employee positions within their proposal, including a job description.

Classifications might include, but are not limited to:

• Parking Enforcement Supervisor/Manager: Assist the parking enforcement staff with day -to-day operations and staffing issues. Supervisor shall be responsible to report with the City on a bi -monthly basis and provide updates on the enforcement process, any feedback from the public, incidents and 687
22 | Page
number of citations issued. A supervisor should possess sufficient IT knowledge to be able to handle employee equipment issues in the field, and the capability of working with the citation processing agency for any citation issues.
• Parking Enforcement Staff: Responsible for the day -to-day management, supervision, and operation of parking enforcement services. These individuals must have the capacity to act as “Ambassadors” for the City, providing information about parking enforcement practices and other information pertinent to the areas where they are working.

The contractor should provide performance metrics for each position so that performance evaluations may take place.

Routes

The Contractor is expected to familiarize themselves with the City prior to submitting a proposal and should provide a schedule of estimated patrol routes and frequency recommendations. The City seeks to ensure that coverage is adequate, fair, regular, and consistent, although it is also expected that the Contractor will alternate the patrol routes on a regular basis to eliminate predictability. The contractor can propose changes to routes and schedules to the City as part of their performance reporting meetings and documentation.

Record Keeping and Reporting

The proposer will be responsible for maintaining records of employment and, upon request, provide the City with personnel and training information for each employee. In addition, the contractor will be responsible for preparing and maintaining records, including logs of parking enforcement activities. Supervisor shall be responsible for attending weekly meetings with the City to provide updates on parking activity and issues. The Contractor will also be expected to purchase parking permits for any employees driving to Salinas.

688
23 | Page
Proposal Requirements

A. Cover Letter: Each Proposer shall submit with their proposal a cover letter identifying the Proposer and the proposal package being submitted. An authorized representative of the Proposer must sign the cover letter.

Proposer’s representative shall identify name, title, office location, telephone number, fax number and e- mail address.

B. Table of Contents: Include a Table of Contents listing the various sections included in the proposal.

C. Description of Services
The description of services shall be prepared in accordance with the following sections:

Section I: Executive Summary
Proposers shall include in their Proposal, an Executive Summary that indicates the firm’s expertise and strengths. Additionally, this section must include a brief statement of the firm’s background and examples of accomplishments that distinguish the firm from other enforcement firms and enable your firm to be the most competitive for this RFP.

Section II: Proposed Approach
Proposers shall describe their approach to meeting the scope of work. The following areas must be addressed in the scope of work:

1) An explanation of the firm’s approach to organizing and implementing the parking enforcement and services.
2) Description of the firm’s approach in working with cities and their staff members. 3) Description of the firm’s management philosophy and strategy for an agreement with the City of Salinas.
4) Examples of parking enforcement and meter operations contracting services and accomplishments, past and present that may be of similar nature to this scope of work. Include names and contacts in association with those contracts for references.
5) Areas not in this RFP, but which the Proposer believes are essential to the effective performance and completion of the services should also be addressed in the proposal.

In this section, the proposing company should also demonstrate their specific capabilities to fulfill the requirements for performance of this contract. The response should include details on the service level proposed for parking enforcement citywide and staffing proposal.

Section III: Staffing
The City desires a single source of contract accountability through the proposing organization, so acknowledgement of this requirement is needed if subcontractors are proposed. Also, each service provider should state the on -site and off -site personnel 689
24 | Page
who will have responsibility for administration of this contract. This section should include the names of any proposed subcontractors that the prime Contractor plans to use.

Section III should include a project organizational chart with the following information:
1) Names and titles of individuals; and
2) Names and titles of possible subcontractors who may be involved in providing the required services.

Section IV: Proposer’s Business Information
Proposal must include the following:
1) Identify the firm’s business structure (i.e. whether the firm is a corporation, limited partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.), location of headquarters office and location of any local offices, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address. 2) Identify the names of general partners or owner(s) of the firm, their titles, office location, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address. 3) List the name, title, address, telephone number, background and responsibilities of the lead management person who will be onsite full time to direct the operations of the outsource services.
4) Include a responsibility matrix indicating the reporting structure and responsibilities of each member of the proposed outsource services project team. 5) Identify each possible subcontractor by firm’s name, primary representative and title, telephone number, fax number, e- mail address, location of office headquarters and location of any local offices.

Section V: Team Experience and Accomplishments
Proposal must include the following information:

A. Project Manager:

Describe the professional qualifications, capabilities, project experience, education, training and the present office location. Provide a list of specific examples of the Project Manager’s qualifications, experience and accomplishment in any relevant past or ongoing projects, for a minimum of three projects. Describe each project in detail, including when the project was completed and where it was located, the name of the company and contact person, including his/her current telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and any other reference information. Describe any experience that required auditing services.

B. Other Key Personnel:
• Include the names and resumes of all key personnel (e.g. supervisors, staff) who are employed by Vendor and who may be assigned to perform services pursuant to a subsequent contract.
• Provide a complete statement of qualifications and experience to accomplish the required scope of work. Include any accomplishments, background and a description of that person’s strengths and skills relative to the work to be performed. This statement must include degrees and certifications obtained 690
25 | Page
and other function while gaining the experience; contract amount managed; what was accomplished; and the beginning and ending dates of the projects cited for relevant experience.

Section VI: Contracting Track Record and Accomplishments Proposers must list a minimum of three (3) most recent contracts with other cities or private groups performing similar services to what are described in this RFP, including a description of the work and the name, address and telephone number of client’s representative responsible for administering the contract.

Section VII: Contractor’s Project Management Responsibilities The City wants a clear understanding of the individual(s) who will be designated as responsible for planning, organizing, directing, and controlling the resources for the parking enforcement program. The contractor should include in their recommendation a discussion of their strategy for meeting the following responsibilities:
• Management of Operations
• Status Reporting
• Human Resources
• Accounting Reports
• Staff Supervision
• Equipment and Supplies Management
• Issue Resolution
• Billing Process

In addition to these areas, the responsibilities of the Contractor’s Project Manager(s) and supervising staff will include the following tasks:

• Managing risk and escalating issues to the City in a timely manner • Providing a quality assurance mechanism for all Contractor activities and deliverables.
• Assisting in the development of the services implementation plan.

Section VIII: Implementation Plan
The contractor shall include a proposed implementation plan and schedule outlining all aspects of the work:

The contractor shall plan to utilize both the City’s existing citation processing vendor and the existing process for managing payments of citations. The vendor should outline the strategy for engagement in these existing processes.

The projected schedule should include any tasks and responsibilities of City staff and departments involved in the implementation process (e.g. Police Department, Parking and Transportation). The City’s desired timeframe is to be operational with the Contractor sixty (60) to ninety (90) days from contract award. If Contractor does not 691
26 | Page
believe this timeframe is achievable, they should state why and submit an alternative implementation schedule.

Contractors should propose standard procedures for handling the City’s support calls and customer service-related complaints and how they relate to their existing staffing and resource models. Contractor should discuss their proposed call and complaint tracking mechanisms for tracking and reporting on critical events, commitments, and problem transactions.

Contractor should discuss methods and procedures it will use to secure parking enforcement equipment, parking meter equipment, and collected parking meter revenues. The contractor should discuss any physical requirements, including how and where employees will meet at the beginning of a shift.

Section IX: Fee Schedule
The contractor shall submit a proposed project budget itemized by task and total project cost stated as a fixed fee. Labor and direct costs should be identified by task.

Hourly rates for project staff shall also be provided.

692
27 | Page
Attachment C – SAMPLE AGREEMENT

693
28 | Page

694
29 | Page

695
30 | Page

696
31 | Page

697
32 | Page

698
33 | Page

699
34 | Page

700
35 | Page

701
36 | Page

702
37 | Page

703
38 | Page

ATTACHMENT D
SAMPLE TABLE FORMAT - QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM RELATIVE TO CITY’S NEEDS Project Name Client Description of work
performed
Total Project Cost Percentage of work
firm as responsible for
Period work was
completed
Client contact
information*

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project:

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project:

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No

Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project:

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project:
* Include Name, Title, and Phone Number

CITY OF SALINAS RFP PARKING ENFORCEMENT
704
39 | Page

ATTACHMENT E

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL FORMAT
(The City is looking for a submittal in this format – Content should match cost for services required) Scope Labor Categories
(e.g., Consultant, Sr. Consultant, etc.)
Est.

Hours
Hourly
Rate
Extended
Rate
Task 1
$ $
$ $
$ $
TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED, TASK 1

$ $
Task 2
$ $
$ $
$ $
TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED, TASK 2

$ $
Task 3
$ $
$ $
$ $
TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED, TASK 3

$ $

TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED
(TASKS 1 – 3)

$ $
705

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
• City of Salinas • October 24th, 2025 •
706

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Cover Letter | City of Salinas

Northern California
Regional Office
5901 Christie Ave
•Suite 202•
Emeryville, CA 94608
P: (510) 250-2052
F: (510) 345-3478
lazparking.com

1 COVER LETTER
October 24th, 2025
Ms. Jenny Davila
City of Salinas – Public Works Department
426 Work Street, Salinas, CA 93901
Subject: Proposal for City-Wide Parking Enforcement Services Dear Ms. Davila,
LAZ Parking is pleased to submit this proposal to continue providing professional parking enforcement services for the City of Salinas. Since 2016, LAZ has proudly partnered with the City to enhance parking compliance, support downtown vitality, and delive r exceptional service to residents and visitors alike. Our long-standing relationship with the City has been defined by collaboration, operational efficiency, and measurable results that align with Salinas’ mobility and quality-of-life goals.

Under the leadership of Project Manager Mike Harper, who has managed the City’s enforcement program since its inception, LAZ has consistently demonstrated the ability to adapt, innovate, and deliver high -performance operations. Working hand in hand with Ci ty staff, we have successfully implemented service adjustments, enhanced enforcement coverage, and maintained strong coordination with the City’s citation processing provider.

As we look ahead, LAZ is excited to build on this strong foundation. Our proposal outlines a seamless transition into the next term, leveraging our regional resources, proven training programs, and technology -driven operational strategies to further optimi ze enforcement, improve compliance, and strengthen community engagement. We are committed to continuing our trusted partnership with the City of Salinas and to delivering a program that remains efficient, transparent, and responsive to the community’s evolving needs.

Thank you for the opportunity to continue serving the City. We look forward to working closely with you to ensure that Salinas’ parking program continues to thrive.

Sincerely,

CINDY HEFNER MUHAMMAD MANSOOR, PTMP
Regional VP, Northern California VP, Municipal Operations 5901 Christie Ave. Ste 202 949 South Coast Drive, Suite 515 Emeryville, CA 94608 Costa Mesa, CA 92626
O: (510) 250-2052 (714) 290-4854
[email protected] [email protected]

707

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Table of Contents | City of Salinas
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Salinas
City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Cover Letter......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................ 2

1. Proposal Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Contact Information ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2. Profile on the Proposing Firm(s) ...................................................................................................................... 6 About LAZ Parking ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Nationally Recognized ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Financial Stability, Capacity, and Resources ................................................................................................................................... 8 Lawsuits or Litigation Disclosure .................................................................................................................................................... 8

3. Qualifications of the Firm ................................................................................................................................ 9 Government Sector Experience ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Unparalleled Parking Enforcement Experience ............................................................................................................................. 11

4. Work Plan or Proposal ................................................................................................................................... 14

4.1. Understanding of the City’s Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 14

4.2. Service Delivery Approach ...................................................................................................................................................... 14

4.3. Meeting the City’s Schedule and Deliverables ....................................................................................................................... 16

4.4. Proven Ability to Deliver .......................................................................................................................................................... 17

4.5. Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

5. Proposed Innovations .................................................................................................................................... 18 Technical & Procedural Innovations .............................................................................................................................................. 18

6. Project Staffing ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Staffing Structure ........................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Organizational Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 21 Government Services Team ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 Resumes ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

7. Proposal Exceptions ...................................................................................................................................... 29

8. Proposal Costs Sheet & Rates ....................................................................................................................... 29

9. Attachments .................................................................................................................................................. 30

708

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Proposal Summary | City of Salinas
3 1. PROPOSAL SUMMARY
LAZ Parking is honored to submit this proposal to continue our valued partnership with the City of Salinas (“City”) for the provision of citywide parking enforcement services. Since 2016, LAZ has proudly served as the City’s parking enforcement provider, delivering reliable, customer- focused, and efficient operations that have enhanced parking compliance, supported public works programs, and contributed to a cleaner, safer, and more accessible Salinas. Over nearly a decade, LAZ has worked hand -in-hand with City management to continuously refine routes, improve efficiency, and strengthen enforcement consistency. This successful collaboration is a testament to our shared commitment to operational excellence, transparency, and community service.

A continued partnership with LAZ ensures no transition risk , seamless continuity of service , and preservation of the City’s operational momentum . Our dedicated on -site team is already fully trained, vetted, and familiar with Salinas’s neighborhoods, business districts, and parking regulations. This local knowledge—combined with LAZ’s unmatched municipal experience and investment in cutting -edge enforcement technologies—positions us uniquely to build upon the City’s success without interruption.

Understanding the City’s Objectives and Scope
LAZ understands that the City seeks a professional and highly motivated partner to deliver consistent, citywide parking enforcement services covering commercial districts, residential permit areas, school zones, and street sweeping routes. The City’s goals include maintaining clean streets, supporting local business turnover, enhancing compliance with parking regulations, and improving revenue recovery through efficient and courteous enforcement.

Our approach is centered on the City’s expectations of:
• Professionalism and accountability in every interaction. • Accurate, consistent, and timely enforcement aligned with Public Works and community needs. • Comprehensive training and supervision to ensure compliance with City standards. • Data-driven reporting and performance tracking; and
• Flexibility to adapt to changing parking policies or expansion of enforcement areas.

LAZ’s program will continue to meet and exceed these expectations through well -trained personnel, rigorous supervision, real -time reporting tools, and constant coordination with City departments and PMB, the City’s citation processing vendor.

Why LAZ is the Best Qualified Firm
With over 40 years of municipal enforcement experience , LAZ Parking is the largest and most experienced private parking operator in the United States, managing over 1.5 million on- street citations annually for cities and public agencies nationwide. Our municipal partners include Berkeley, Palo Alto, San Mateo, South San Francisco, San Leandro, and numerous others across California. We understand the operational discipline, responsiveness, and professionalism that cities demand from their contractors.
709

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Proposal Summary | City of Salinas
4 Key Differentiators and Strengths:
• Proven Partner in Salinas: Nearly 10 years of uninterrupted, successful service with a strong partnership model and exemplary performance.
• Seamless Continuity: No startup delay, no transition cost, no learning curve—ensuring uninterrupted enforcement and minimal administrative burden on City staff. • Quality & Accountability: 97%+ citation accuracy, robust quality assurance, and daily performance tracking.
• Community-Centric Enforcement: LAZ’s “Ambassador Approach” emphasizes courtesy, education, and fairness while maintaining enforcement consistency. • Technology Integration: Compatibility with PMB systems, handheld devices with photo and voice documentation, and automated reports powered by Microsoft BI. • Training & Professionalism: Comprehensive training programs in local ordinances, customer service, courtroom procedures, and conflict resolution—tailored specifically to Salinas’s policies. • Proven Compliance & Renewal Record: 100% renewal rate for our municipal contracts, a reflection of our clients’ trust and satisfaction.

Implementation and Service Continuity Plan
Because LAZ is already embedded within the City’s parking ecosystem, our implementation will be immediate and seamless. The existing field officers, supervisors, and vehicles will continue operations with no disruption. Our Project Manager, Mike Harper, will remain the primary point of contact, supported by regional management and LAZ’s national municipal operations division.

Immediate Continuity Commitments:
• Retain all trained and cleared enforcement personnel currently serving the City. • Maintain existing routes, schedules, and reporting protocols while introducing incremental improvements.
• Continue partnership with PMB for citation processing and data synchronization. • Provide consistent, visible presence in residential, commercial, and school zones. • Continue weekly and bi-monthly meetings with City staff to align operational goals and address emerging needs.

Enhancement Initiatives:
• Deploy enhanced business intelligence dashboards to provide the City with actionable insights. • Expand community engagement efforts to promote voluntary compliance and education. • Introduce ongoing field audits and performance scorecards to drive accountability. • Support the City’s street sweeping and residential permit programs with optimized route planning.

A Proven Partner for Today and Tomorrow
LAZ Parking’s record in Salinas speaks for itself: reliable service delivery, professional field operations, and a culture of collaboration and responsiveness. We understand the importance of balancing enforcement with community service and are proud to ha ve been an extension of the City’s efforts to maintain clean, safe, and accessible streets.
710

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Proposal Summary | City of Salinas
5 Choosing to continue this partnership ensures the City of Salinas retains a trusted, experienced, and proven partner; one that requires no transition, carries no operational risk, and brings unmatched expertise to meet the City’s present and future parking enforcement needs. We look forward to continuing this partnership and building upon the foundation of success we have established together.

Contact Information
Primary Contact:

Cindy Hefner
Regional Vice President, Northern California
W (510) 250-2052 x7352 | C (210) 241-9833
5901 Christie Avenue, Suite 202 | Emeryville | CA 94608

Alternate Contact:

Steve Mooney
General Manager, Northern California
W (510) 250-2052 | C (650) 766-9803
5901 Christie Avenue, Suite 202 | Emeryville | CA 94608

Corporate Contact:

Muhammad Mansoor, PTMP
Vice President, Government Services
C (714) 290-4854
949 South Coast Drive, Suite 515 | Costa Mesa | CA 92626 711

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Profile on the Proposing Firm(s) | City of Salinas
6 2. PROFILE ON THE PROPOSING FIRM(S)
About LAZ Parking
Over Four Decades of Experience
LAZ Parking was founded in 1981 and has been at the forefr ont of the parking industry ever since, constantly innovating and adapting to the dynamic needs of our customers. Although we employ over 15,000 parking professionals in 42 states, each of our operations is managed locally. With over three decades of municipal parking experience, including the past 10 years as the incumbent parking operator for the City of Salinas, our local Bay Area based team will be responsible for providing citywide parking enforcement services. This team is already integrated, experienced and ready to serve you. • The largest privately held parking company in
the USA with a strong presence throughout
California
• Recently awarded multiple municipal contracts
in the Bay Area adding resources and support.
• Unique municipal parking experience, managing
more than 550,000 parking spaces for over 150
government agencies, cities and counties.
• Local and regional leaders dedicated to your
success, many with decades of parking
experience including hands on experience with
the City of Salinas parking program and
throughout California.
• Dedicated Government Services support team for future program enhancements, effective research, rapid technology implementation and continuous municipal support.

At the core of LAZ Parking’s business model is a commitment to its employees, customers, and the communities it serves. LAZ's unique culture fosters engagement, accountability, and continuous improvement, driving consistently high performance. Additionally, the company places an emphasis on environmental sustainability, diversity, a nd social responsibility, ensuring its impact extends beyond business operations.

LAZ Parking’s ongoing growth, success, and
commitment to serving its clients stem from its
dedication to living its mission. The company’s
independence; a defining advantage among large
operators in the mobility industry empowers LAZ to
stay true to its principles and focus on building long- term, mutually beneficial relationships.

Today, LAZ operates over 4,000 locations and
manages 1.6 million parking spaces in 538 cities
across 42 states. By adhering to its founding
principles while embracing technological innovation
and corporate responsibility, LAZ continues to set the standard in the mobility industry.

712

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Profile on the Proposing Firm(s) | City of Salinas
7 Nationally Recognized
IPMI Accredited Parking Organization with Distinction
LAZ Parking earned the Accredited Parking Organization (APO) with Distinction status in March 2024, recognizing the company’s excellence in financial and operational accountability, customer care, employee training, sustainability, and technological innova tion. This certification, granted for three years, establishes LAZ as a leader in the parking and mobility industry.

CAPP Certification Program
LAZ Parking promotes the Certified Administrators of Public Parking (CAPP) program, enhancing the expertise of its leadership team. Many of LAZ’s managers have earned or are working toward CAPP or CPP certifications, demonstrating a commitment to excellence in the parking industry.

Environmental, Social, & Governance (ESG)
LAZ Parking launched an ESG Division in 2022, aligning with its mission to create opportunities for employees and value for clients. The division focuses on social awareness, wellness, diversity, and sustainable business practices. LAZ collaborates with Qu inn+Partners to implement ESG frameworks and achieve Net Zero by 2036. The company’s environmental goals include advancing electrification, embracing digitization, and supporting responsible suppliers.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI is a central component of LAZ’s ESG strategy. The company is focused on fostering an inclusive environment through diverse policies, performance monitoring, and accountability. LAZ supports small, minority- owned, and women- owned businesses through its Supplier Diversity and Inclusion Plan, promoting equity both within and outside the organization.

LAZ Charitable Foundation
The LAZ Charitable Foundation uplifts underserved
communities by supporting housing, education, food
security, mental health, and career development. Its
mission, “Elevating Humanity,” emphasizes
empowering individuals, promoting social justice,
and creating opportunities for everyone to thrive.

Deeply rooted in our DNA, LAZ seeks opportunities to
get involved in the communities we serve and are
particularly proud of our partnership with Special
Olympics Southern California, for whom we host an
annual charitable golf tournament and participate in
the annual Plane Pull at Long Beach Airport.

713

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Profile on the Proposing Firm(s) | City of Salinas
8 Financial Stability, Capacity, and Resources
LAZ Parking is a privately held, financially stable company with more than 40 years of continuous operations and a strong national presence. Headquartered in Hartford, Connecticut, LAZ employs over 15,000 team members and manages more than 1.5 million parking spaces nationwide.

Our company maintains the financial capacity and operational resources necessary to support large - scale municipal programs such as the City of Salinas’s parking enforcement contract. LAZ’s balance sheet reflects consistent year- over-year revenue growth, zero long -term debt exposure, and strong liquidity supported by national banking relationships. These resources allow LAZ to invest continuously in new technology, vehicles, uniforms, and enforcement tools without reliance on external financing.

Financial statements (including audited balance sheets and income statements for the last two fiscal years) will be provided under separate confidential cover to substantiate LAZ’s financial stability and capacity to fulfill all contractual obligations.

No subcontractors are proposed for this project. All services including staffing, training, supervision, equipment, and administration will be provided directly by LAZ Parking using existing local and regional resources, ensuring complete accountability and seamless operational continuity.

Lawsuits or Litigation Disclosure
LAZ Parking affirms that there are no lawsuits, claims, or settlements within the past five (5) years arising from any public project undertaken by LAZ Parking or its subcontractors that would have any material impact on the company’s ability to perform the required services under this contract.

Like most national service providers operating in multiple jurisdictions, LAZ occasionally encounters minor employment related or contract interpretation matters that are typical for organizations of our size.

None of these have resulted in any findings or settlements that affect LAZ’s financial stability, reputation, or capacity to deliver municipal parking services.

To date, LAZ has never defaulted on, been terminated from, or failed to complete any municipal or public- sector contract. Our record of performance and renewal with public agencies including the City of S an Francisco, City of Berkeley , City of Palo Alto, and others demonstrates our consistent compliance, accountability, and commitment to our municipal partners.

714

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Qualifications of the Firm | City of Salinas
9 3. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM
As a full-service parking management company with more
than four decades of municipal experience, LAZ Parking
fully understands the transformative impact of a well-
managed parking program on community accessibility,
quality of life, and economic vitality. Since 2016, LAZ has proudly partnered with the City of Salinas, delivering
professional, consistent, and customer- focused parking enforcement services that have strengthened compliance, supported Public Works initiatives, and improved
neighborhood livability. Across California, LAZ has earned a reputation as the trusted partner of choice for dozens of cities nationwide; each partnership reflecting our ability to adapt to local needs, maintain operational excellence, and deliver measurable results.

Our Government Services Division is recognized nationally for its unparalleled expertise in municipal parking operations. We currently manage more than 5 50,000 parking spaces and issue over 1.5 million citations for public agencies across the United States, providing enforcement, permit management, and technology integration services for municipalities, transit authorities, and state and federal agencies. Our government portfolio includes high -demand downtowns, r esidential permit zones, and citywide enforcement programs comparable in scale and
complexity to Salinas.

Our comprehensive approach combines data -driven
enforcement, advanced technology, and community
engagement to promote compliance and improve the
parking experience for residents, businesses, and visitors.

LAZ’s services encompass full lifecycle parking
management; from enforcement and citation issuance to
permit administration and mobile payment integration
supported by robust revenue integrity controls, transparent reporting, and superior customer service. We bring the
resources of a national operator with the accountability and responsiveness of a local partner, ensuring each program operates efficiently, cost-effectively, and in full compliance with City policies and state laws.

With extensive experience managing long -term municipal contracts, LAZ has developed industry -leading systems for performance measurement, staff training, and service quality assurance. Our focus on sustainability, safety, and operational integrity ensures that every dollar entrusted to us delivers visible comm unity benefit. For the City of Salinas, LAZ offers not only proven capability but also a deep, ongoing commitment to being a responsive, innovative, and reliable partner dedicated to enhancing the City’s parking enforcement program today and into the future.

715

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Qualifications of the Firm | City of Salinas
10 Government Sector Experience
Our experience, leadership and philosophy have made LAZ Parking one of the nation’s premier operators specializing in parking services for municipalities and government agencies. We have an unmatched track record operating municipal parking systems and currently manage more than 550,000 parking spaces for over 150 government agencies, cities and counties.

The following is provided as a sample of LAZ Parking’s public sector clients, including the approximate number of spaces for each:

California Partnerships
• City of Long Beach (10,300)
• Long Beach Municipal Airport (1,550)
• City of San Francisco On Street (28,800)
• City of Inglewood, (12,750)
• City of Stockton (6,145)
• City of Burbank (1,475)
• City of Malibu (1,950)
• City of Newport Beach (4,100)
• City of Glendale (3,008)
• City of Los Angeles / LADOT (38,000)
• City of West Hollywood (3,360)
• City of San Francisco Off Street (3,115)
• California State Parks (2,665)
• City of San Mateo (2,610)
• County of Alameda (2,500)
• City of Calabasas (1,100)
• LA Beaches & Harbors (10,000)
• LAX IT (1,500)
• City of San Bruno (1,820)
• City of San Leandro (1,450)
• City of San Marcos (1,200)
• City of South San Francisco (2,100)
• City of Santa Ana (2,500)
National Partnerships
• Washington Metro Area Transit Auth (59,000)
• City of Las Vegas (NV) (3,000)
• Volusia County, FL (2,100)
• City of Baton Rouge, LA (2,000)
• City of Coral Gables, FL (1,775)
• City of Baltimore, MD (1,440)
• City of South Miami, FL (1,400)
• City of Arvada, CO (1,100)
• Cobb County, GA (1,380)
• City of Chicago Meters System (36,000)
• Montgomery County, MD (21,500)
• NY City Housing Authority (20,000)
• NY Metro Transit Authority (16,600)
• City of Lincoln, NE (14,780)
• Rhode Island State Beaches (8,100)
• City of Kansas City, MO (6,600)
• City of Miami Beach, FL (6,000)
• City of New Rochelle, NY (5,868)
• City of Lowell, MA (5,566)
• Norwalk Parking Authority (4,233)
• City of Stamford, CT (3,400)
• Birmingham Jefferson Conv. Complex (2,700)
• City of Syracuse, NY (2,525)
• City of Westminster, CO (2,500)
716

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Qualifications of the Firm | City of Salinas
11 Unparalleled Parking Enforcement Experience
LAZ Parking is a national leader in municipal parking enforcement with a dedicated Parking Enforcement Business Segment operating within our Government Services Division. Since 1988, we have delivered reliable, professional enforcement services to municipalities across the United States, issuing nearly 1.5 million citations each year while maintaining an industry -leading accuracy rate with fewer than three percent of citations dismissed. This level of performance reflects our commitment to precision, accountability, and service quality.

With more than four decades of experience supporting local governments, LAZ has successfully transitioned numerous enforcement programs from internally managed or police- led operations to efficient, transparent, and technology -enabled contracted services. These partnerships have allowed cities to strengthen compliance, reduce administrative costs, and improve community satisfaction through professionalized operations and clear communication with the public.

Today, LAZ manages more than 150 government contracts nationwide and maintains a record of 100 percent contract renewals, a reflection of our clients’ trust and the consistent results we deliver. Our expertise includes the design and operation of complex e nforcement programs that require extensive coordination with city departments, law enforcement, and public works divisions to align with local objectives and maintain community confidence.

LAZ’s longstanding presence in California includes partnerships with cities such as Salinas, San Mateo, Palo Alto, San Bruno, South San Fr ancisco, San Leandro in Northern CA and over a dozen cities in Southern California. These relationships demonstrate our ability to deliver high -performing programs in dynamic, high-density environments where parking enforcement directly supports mobility, safety, and quality of life.

Technology and innovation are central to LAZ’s enforcement success. We utilize License Plate Recognition (LPR) systems, electronic handheld citation devices, and fully integrated cloud -based citation management and enforcement systems that streamline opera tions and increase accuracy. All enforcement data flows into LAZ’s Business Intelligence (BI) platform, a unified reporting system that gives our municipal partners real-time insight into enforcement activity, citation trends, and compliance patterns. This allows cities like Salinas to make informed, data -driven decisions and refine parking policies to better serve residents, visitors, and businesses.

LAZ brings a proven record of success, supported by technology integration, advanced training, and real- time operational oversight. Our enforcement programs utilize license plate recognition technology, cloud-based citation management systems, and data-driven reporting tools that provide full transparency and actionable insights. These capabilities will enable Salinas to efficiently manage 24/7 enforcement operations, ensure compliance with municipal codes, and maintain the integrity of its street sweeping and general enforcement programs.

Above all, LAZ’s approach to enforcement is citizen centric and community-focused. We emphasize professionalism, consistency, and respect in every interaction while upholding the City’s parking regulations and public safety goals. Our proven experience, dedicated personnel, and technology -driven solutions position LAZ Parking as the ideal partner to support the City of Salinas in delivering a modern, efficient, and service-oriented parking enforcement program.

717

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Qualifications of the Firm | City of Salinas
12 The table below highlights a selection of municipalities where LAZ Parking provides parking enforcement and compliance management services. These programs represent a wide range of enforcement models, from street sweeping and general parking enforcement to citation processing, permit management, and technology integration. Each example reflects LAZ’s ability to adapt to the unique needs of our municipal partners and deliver efficient, transparent, and community -oriented enforcement operations consistent with the goals of the City of Salinas.

ANNUAL CITATIONS ISSUED

OPERATIONS/MANAGEMENT

PARKING ENFORCEMENT

ELECTRONIC HANDHELDS

SMART TECHNOLOGY

LPR TECHNOLOGY

ENFORCE ALL MCS & STATE CVC

PERMIT ENFORCEMENT

ON STREET ENFORCEMENT

OFF-STREET ENFORCEMENT

SURFACE LOTS

STREET SWEEPING ENFORCE

CUSTOMER PHONE SUPPORT

TOWING AND BOOTING

TRAFFIC DISPATCH SERVICES

TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES
California Municipal Enforcement Clients
City of West Hollywood 200,000                City of Inglewood 90,000               
City of Santa Ana 45,000           
CA State Parks 30,000        
City of Salinas 20,000           
City of Palo Alto 10,500       
City of San Mateo 32,500              
Newport Beach 70,000          
City of San Marcos 10,000           
City of San Leandro 15,000       
City of Burbank 45,000               
National Municipal Enforcement Clients
City of Chicago, IL 550,000          
Montgomery County,
MD 150,000            
New York MTA 50,000           
South Miami, FL 45,000          
Norwalk, CT 40,000           
City of Arvada, CO 10,500            

718

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Qualifications of the Firm | City of Salinas
13 ATTACHMENT D
SAMPLE TABLE FORMAT - QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM RELATIVE TO CITY’S NEEDS Project Name Client Description of work
performed
Total Project Cost Percentage of work
firm as responsible for
Period work was
completed
Client contact
information*
San Mateo Enforcement
Program
City of San Mateo / San
Mateo Police
Department
Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$7.1M 100% Nov 2019 - Present Sgt. Craig Collum
Phone: 650-522-7742
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.

West Hollywood
Enforcement Program
City of West Hollywood Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$14M 100% July 2020 – Present Vince Guarino
Phone: 323-848-6426
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.

Burbank Enforcement
Program
City of Burbank /
Burbank Police
Department
Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$6.5M 100% April 2023 - Present Emil Brimway
Phone: 818.238.3106
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No

Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.

Santa Ana Enforcement City of Santa Ana /
Santa Ana Police
Department
Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$4.7M 100% July 2018 Yolanda Bautista
Phone: 714.245.8225
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.
* Include Name, Title, and Phone Number
719

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Work Plan or Proposal | City of Salinas
14 4. WORK PLAN OR PROPOSAL

4.1. Understanding of the City’s Objectives
Since 2016, LAZ Parking has proudly partnered with the City of Salinas to deliver professional, courteous, and effective parking enforcement services that promote compliance, maintain public trust, and support the City’s quality-of-life goals. Our understanding of the City’s objectives is shaped by nearly a decade of hands-on collaboration with City leadership, Public Works, and community stakeholders.

The City’s parking enforcement program plays a vital role in:
• Supporting street sweeping and public works operations to maintain clean, safe neighborhoods. • Ensuring turnover and accessibility in commercial districts, supporting economic vitality and fairness for local businesses.
• Encouraging voluntary compliance through consistent, fair, and transparent enforcement practices. • Delivering exceptional customer service to residents and visitors while maintaining enforcement integrity.
• Promoting data-driven management and accountability, enabling the City to make informed operational decisions.

LAZ recognizes that the City’s program is not just about enforcement; it’s about stewardship, public service, and maintaining the balance between regulation and accessibility. Our approach is built to meet these goals through seamless continuity, operational excellence, and community -oriented service delivery.

4.2. Service Delivery Approach
As the incumbent provider, LAZ brings a fully operational, trained, and equipped team that already understands the City’s enforcement environment, geography, and regulations. This allows us to continue service without any transition period or learning curve , ensuring uninterrupted enforcement from day one of the contract.

Our service approach is anchored on five key pillars: continuity, professionalism, accountability, transparency, and adaptability.

Task 1: Program Continuity and Transition Management
• Seamless Service Continuation: LAZ’s current enforcement team, vehicles, and systems are fully in place, allowing operations to continue without disruption. • Route Review and Optimization: Within the first 15 days, LAZ will conduct a comprehensive route analysis to ensure efficient coverage of street sweeping areas, school zones, business districts, and residential permit zones.
• Coordination with PMB: As the City’s citation processing vendor, Parking Management Bureau (PMB) will remain fully integrated with LAZ’s handheld citation systems for uninterrupted data transfer and reporting.
• Kickoff and Calibration: An operational kickoff meeting will be held with City staff to review enforcement priorities, communication protocols, and performance benchmarks for the new contract term.
720

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Work Plan or Proposal | City of Salinas
15 Task 2: Daily Parking Enforcement Operations
• Coverage and Schedules: Enforcement
operations will continue Monday through Friday,
from 5:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., in alignment with the
City’s street sweeping and maintenance
schedule.
• Focused & Consistent Enforcement: Officers will
monitor time-restricted, residential permit, and
street sweeping zones, issuing citations for
violations while maintaining a respectful and
educational approach with the public.
• Patrol Efficiency: Route optimization software
and GPS tracking will ensure balanced coverage
and efficient patrol patterns throughout the City.
• Supervisor Oversight: Field supervisors will
conduct random audits, ride-alongs, and field
evaluations to maintain quality control and
accountability.
• Special Requests: LAZ will respond promptly to City requests for targeted enforcement (e.g., during events, street maintenance, or community complaints).

Task 3: Personnel Recruitment, Training, and Management • Experienced Local Team: LAZ will retain and expand upon its existing enforcement team led by our current Project Manager, many of whom are long-standing employees familiar with Salinas’s neighborhoods and community expectations.
• Comprehensive Training: Every officer undergoes training in Salinas’s Municipal Code, citation issuance procedures, customer service, conflict resolution, defensive driving, and safety. • Customer-Centered Approach: Our “Ambassador Enforcement” philosophy emphasizes education, respect, and positive community interaction, reinforcing compliance through understanding, not confrontation.
• Ongoing Development: Officers receive quarterly refresher courses on operational updates, legal changes, and de-escalation tactics to maintain peak performance and professionalism. • Performance Monitoring: Supervisors will use a structured performance review system with metrics such as accuracy rate, coverage efficiency, and customer interaction quality.

Task 4: Equipment, Vehicles, and Technology
• Fleet Management: LAZ’s dedicated enforcement vehicles will remain deployed in Salinas. Each vehicle will be clearly marked per City standards, equipped with amber safety lighting, and maintained to ensure reliability and public safety.
• Handheld Technology: Enforcement officers use state-of-the-art handheld ticket writers with photo capture and GPS time-stamping for citation integrity and dispute resolution. • Integration with PMB: Data is automatically uploaded to PMB’s system, allowing real-time visibility into citation issuance, trends, and compliance rates.
• Preventative Maintenance: Regular inspection schedules ensure all vehicles and devices remain operational with no downtime. Replacement equipment is deployed immediately if needed. 721

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Work Plan or Proposal | City of Salinas
16 Task 5: Quality Assurance, Reporting, and Communication • Dedicated Project Manager: Mike Harper will continue as the on-site Project Manager, serving as the primary liaison to City staff and responsible for daily operations oversight.
• Real-Time Performance Monitoring: LAZ’s Business
Intelligence (BI) dashboard aggregates citation, patrol, and coverage data, providing actionable insights and performance metrics.
• Regular Reporting: Weekly operational reports and monthly performance summaries will be provided to the City, covering citation activity, complaints, staffing, and KPIs.
• Performance Audits: Supervisors and regional management will conduct regular audits to ensure compliance with City standards, safety requirements, and customer service expectations.
• Open Communication: LAZ maintains 24/7 availability for City staff to address urgent requests or operational adjustments.

Task 6: Community Engagement and Customer Service
• Ambassador Philosophy: LAZ’s officers act as City ambassadors, helping visitors, answering questions, and reinforcing the City’s commitment to service and fairness. • Public Education: LAZ will support the City in public education campaigns related to parking rules, street sweeping schedules, and voluntary compliance programs. • Complaint Resolution: All complaints are logged, reviewed, and resolved promptly, with documented outcomes shared in regular City reports.
• Partnership Culture: Our local team collaborates closely with Public Works, Police, and other City departments to ensure coordinated enforcement and shared success.

4.3. Meeting the City’s Schedule and Deliverables
Because LAZ is the incumbent provider, service continuity will be immediate upon award , eliminating transition time or onboarding delays.

Implementation Timeline Overview
• Day 1–5: Contract execution, kickoff meeting, and operational continuity verification. • Day 6–15: Route review, schedule optimization, and initial quality audit. • Day 16–30: Full deployment of updated BI dashboard and reporting framework. • Ongoing: Weekly reports, bi-monthly coordination meetings, and continuous improvement reviews.

Our well -established structure ensures the City’s enforcement operations continue smoothly, consistently, and efficiently from contract award through completion without gaps or performance decline.
722

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Work Plan or Proposal | City of Salinas
17 4.4. Proven Ability to Deliver
LAZ’s nine-year record of performance in Salinas reflects our commitment to operational excellence, collaboration, and accountability. We have consistently met or exceeded City expectations in coverage, accuracy, and responsiveness. Our national resources, combined with our local presence, provide unmatched reliability and depth of expertise.

With a 97%+ citation accuracy rate , zero service interruptions, and a 100% municipal contract renewal rate, LAZ has demonstrated its ability to deliver on schedule, within budget, and in full compliance with municipal standards. Our strength lies in consistency , proven processes, dependable staffing, and transparent reporting that build trust and deliver results.

4.5. Summary
LAZ Parking’s Work Plan is a proven blueprint for successful municipal parking enforcement ; one that has already delivered measurable results in the City of Salinas. Our continued partnership ensures no transition risk, immediate operational readiness, and the benefit of a trusted team deeply familiar with the City’s policies, geography, and community.

Through advanced technology, disciplined operations, and an ambassador -style service model, LAZ will continue to provide enforcement that enhances compliance, maintains clean and safe streets, and supports the City’s broader goals of livability and community pride.

Simply put, no other proposer can match LAZ’s continuity, local experience, and established partnership with the City of Salinas.
723

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Proposed Innovations | City of Salinas
18 5. PROPOSED INNOVATIONS
Technical & Procedural Innovations
Introducing Mobile License Plate Recognition (LPR) Technology for Enhanced Enforcement and Data-Driven Management
As the City of Salinas’s parking enforcement partner since 2016, LAZ Parking continually seeks opportunities to leverage proven technology to improve operational efficiency, compliance accuracy, and customer experience. One such innovation we propose for future integration into the City’s enforcement operations is mobile License Plate Recognition (LPR) technology —mounted on enforcement vehicles to automate enforcement of time-limited zones, residential parking districts, and other regulated areas.

Proven Technology – Trusted by Municipal Clients Nationwide LAZ has successfully deployed mobile and fixed LPR systems across multiple municipal programs nationwide, including San Mateo, Inglewood and West Hollywood , where these systems have dramatically improved efficiency, coverage, and enforcement accuracy. By scanning and matching license plates in real time, LPR technology allows enforcement officers to quickly identify vehicles in violation, confirm parking compliance, and collect valuable data to support broader parking management objectives.

Benefits of Mobile LPR for the City of Salinas
The integration of LPR into Salinas’s parking program would immediately enhance service delivery and long-term planning capabilities in several key areas:

1. Increased Efficiency and Coverage
• LPR-equipped vehicles can capture thousands of license plates per shift, covering significantly more area than manual patrols.
• Officers can focus on confirming and issuing citations, while the system automatically records time-stamped photographic evidence for accuracy and transparency. • Routes can be optimized using real-time data to ensure balanced enforcement coverage throughout all City zones.

2. Enhanced Timed Zone Enforcement
• LPR technology automatically records the location and time a vehicle was first observed, enabling precise monitoring of time-limited parking zones.
• This eliminates the need for manual chalking or digital marking, ensuring greater consistency, fairness, and productivity.
• The system’s accuracy minimizes human error, providing an objective and auditable record that strengthens citation integrity.

3. Support for Occupancy and Utilization Studies
• In addition to enforcement, mobile LPR provides the City with valuable analytical data on parking patterns, turnover, and utilization across different districts and times of day. 724

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Proposed Innovations | City of Salinas
19 • This data can be easily visualized through LAZ’s Business Intelligence (BI) platform, empowering the City to make data-driven decisions on policy, pricing, and infrastructure investments. • Over time, these insights help identify high-demand areas, optimize enforcement schedules, and guide parking resource allocation.

4. Foundation for Residential Permit District Expansion • As the City considers expanding its Residential Parking Permit Districts, LPR offers a scalable solution for efficient permit validation.
• Vehicles registered to permitted residents are automatically recognized and verified, streamlining enforcement and reducing administrative burden.
• LPR minimizes manual permit checks and improves compliance rates while maintaining a positive resident experience.
• The system can easily integrate with existing permit management platforms (such as Passport or PMB), ensuring seamless data flow between enforcement and permit administration.

5. Transparency, Accountability, and Public Confidence
• Each scan includes a GPS location, time stamp, and image, creating an indisputable record that supports fairness and transparency in enforcement.
• The City gains access to accurate performance reports, complaint validation tools, and operational insights, enhancing public confidence in enforcement practices. • LPR also improves officer safety by reducing the need for manual documentation in high-traffic or constrained environments.

Integration and Implementation Approach
Should the City wish to pursue this innovation, LAZ can implement mobile LPR technology without disruption to current enforcement operations. Our approach includes:
• Program Implementation: Launching an initial LPR vehicle within 60 days of approval to demonstrate performance and refine operational settings. • Integration with PMB: Configuring LPR data feeds to integrate with the City’s existing citation and permit management system.
• Officer Training: Providing comprehensive training to enforcement personnel on LPR operations, data accuracy, and field validation.
• Data Security and Privacy: Ensuring all captured data complies with State and City privacy requirements and is retained in accordance with local regulations.

A Future-Ready Parking Program for Salinas
By integrating LPR technology, the City of Salinas would take a proactive step toward a modern, efficient, and data-informed parking management system. This innovation not only enhances current enforcement effectiveness but also builds the technological fo undation for future initiatives such as dynamic curb management, residential permitting expansion, and real-time occupancy tracking.

LAZ Parking’s experience deploying and managing LPR technology across California ensures the City will benefit from a proven, reliable, and scalable system tailored to Salinas’s specific needs. Our commitment to partnership and innovation positions LAZ to help the City advance its mobility goals while maintaining the fairness, integrity, and community -centered approach that have defined our successful collaboration since 2016.
725

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
20 6. PROJECT STAFFING
As the City of Salinas’s long-standing parking enforcement partner since 2016, LAZ Parking maintains a dedicated, experienced team fully assigned to the City’s program. Our staffing model ensures consistent citywide coverage, balanced workloads, and clear accountability through direct on -site supervision and strong communication with City staff.

Staffing Structure
The Salinas enforcement program is led by Mike Harper, a highly experienced Project Manager who has overseen the contract since its inception. Mike provides daily oversight of all operations, supervises enforcement staff, coordinates with City departments, and ensures all service standards and performance metrics are met or exceeded.

Below is the current staffing structure for the City of Salinas program:

Position Name Role & Responsibilities
Project Manager Mike
Harper
Oversees all contract operations, supervises enforcement officers, manages scheduling and route assignments, ensures compliance with City expectations, and serves as the primary point of contact for the City of Salinas.

Parking
Enforcement
Officer
Shawna
Parker
Provides daily enforcement coverage across assigned beats, ensures adherence to parking regulations, and supports special enforcement assignments.

Parking
Enforcement
Officer
Anthony
Galvan
Conducts patrols, enforces time-limited, permit, and street sweeping zones, and supports customer service and citation accuracy.

Parking
Enforcement
Officer
Melissa
Boen
Responsible for enforcement patrols, documentation accuracy, and community interaction, focusing on compliance and fairness.

Parking
Enforcement
Officer
Mark
Boehme
Ensures consistent enforcement coverage, assists with route optimization, and provides field support during high-demand periods.

All officers are uniformed, trained, and equipped to meet City standards and maintain a professional public presence. LAZ ensures full coverage through efficient scheduling, cross -training, and operational oversight.

Daily Enforcement Beats
To ensure equitable citywide coverage and consistent enforcement presence, LAZ divides the City of Salinas into eight primary enforcement beats. Each beat is strategically designed to reflect parking demand, zoning priorities, and street sweeping schedules.

726

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
21 Beat
No.

Beat Name /
Area Description of Coverage
1 Downtown Central business district, retail corridors, and high-turnover parking zones. 2 Hospital Surrounding medical facilities and adjacent residential areas. 3 Eastside Residential and mixed-use areas requiring consistent compliance monitoring.
4 Northeast Primarily residential districts and school zones. 5 Northwest Residential and arterial streets supporting access to local businesses. 6 Mid-Town North Mixed commercial-residential corridors, including transitional areas. 7 Southeast Residential neighborhoods with periodic enforcement and school support. 8 Mid-Town South Combination of residential and light commercial zones, including secondary corridors.

Each officer is assigned to designated beats daily to ensure balanced workload distribution and comprehensive citywide coverage. Routes and assignments are periodically reviewed and adjusted by the Project Manager in coordination with City staff to address evolving priorities and community feedback.

Organizational Summary
Under LAZ’s structure, all field staff report directly to Project Manager Mike Harper, who in turn reports to Regional Operations Management for oversight and support. This alignment ensures accountability, quick decision-making, and consistent communication between the City and LAZ. This structure refined and proven over nine years of continuous service ensures that the City of Salinas receives efficient, transparent, and community-oriented enforcement coverage every day.

Organizational Chart
LAZ Parking brings an extensive history of success in both parking operations and customer service, backed by decades of experience managing municipal enforcement programs throughout California. Our national network provides strategic resources, technical expertise, and analytical support to strengthen every local partnership we maintain.

The following team represents the dedicated professionals who will continue leading the City of Salinas Citywide Parking Enforcement Program, ensuring efficient operations, exceptional service quality, and seamless communication with City staff. The organizational chart below illustrates our structure and highlights the strong local leadership supported by regional and national resources.

Biographies of key management personnel are provided on the following pages, demonstrating the depth of experience and commitment that LAZ brings to the City of Salinas. 727

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
22 Local Management Team
Mike Harper, Project Manager – Salinas Enforcement Program Mike Harper brings over 20 years of experience in parking enforcement and transportation operations, with a proven record of leading municipal programs across California. He began his career managing toll operations for PRWT Services under the Lockheed Martin Transportation Corridor Agency contract and advanced through senior operational roles at Central Parking System overseeing multiple enforcement programs throughout Southern California. Since 2016, Mike has successfully managed the City of Salinas parking enforcement program, serving as the primary point of contact for LAZ Parking and City staff. His hands- on leadership, deep local knowledge, and commitment to partnership have been instrumental in the ongoing success and responsiveness of the City’s parking program.

Anthony Hamilton, Director of Operations
Anthony brings more than 12 years of progressive experience in parking operations and municipal enforcement management. Beginning his career as a parking cashier, his strong work ethic and leadership have propelled him into regional management, where he no w oversees multiple LAZ Parking operations across Northern California, including enforcement programs throughout the Peninsula and South Bay. Anthony provides ongoing regional operational support to the City of Salinas enforcement program, ensuring consis tency, efficiency, and adherence to City performance standards. His experience spans municipal enforcement, commercial parking, special events, hospitals, luxury hotels, and large mixed -use developments. Known for his ability to manage complex, high- volume operations with professionalism and precision, Anthony excels in optimizing service delivery, strengthening client relationships, and implementing strategic initiatives that drive operational success across LAZ’s Northern California portfolio. 728

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
23 Steve Mooney PTMP, Regional General Manager
Steve Mooney joined LAZ Parking’s Northern California management team in 2021, bringing over 17 years of experience in the transportation and hospitality industries. His background includes commercial parking operations, municipal on -street enforcement, stadium and special event parking, and luxury hotel valet management. Steve began his career with The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, where his leadership and commitment to service excellence led to multiple management roles. Since transitioning to the parking and transportation sector in 2013, Steve has built a strong reputation for developing high-performing teams, strengthening client relationships, and driving operational efficiency across diverse portfolios. Steve continues to provide strategic and operatio nal support for LAZ’s municipal and commercial programs throughout Northern California, including ongoing oversight assistance for the City of Salinas enforcement program.

Cindy Hefner, Regional Vice President
Cindy joined LAZ Parking in 2014 and brings over 18 years of parking industry experience and a proven record of operational excellence and leadership. As Regional Vice President, she provides strategic direction and operational support to ensure contract performance and client satisfaction in the region . Her expertise spans automated parking systems, enforcement operations, valet, and self-park management. Cindy’s focus on efficiency, team development, and service quality has driven consistent growth and client retention throughout her career. She plays an active role in supporting the City of Salinas parking enforcement program, working closely with the Contract Manager to sustain operational excellence and ensure alignment with the City’s goals.

Government Services Team
Carrie Ann Verge, Director of Finance & Compliance
Carrie Ann Verge joined LAZ Parking in 2021 as part of the acquisition of Serco Parking Services. In her role as Director of Finance, she plays a vital role in ensuring the financial oversight and compliance of our national municipal portfolio. With over t wo decades of experience in the Transportation Industry, Carrie Ann has a strong background in supporting and managing government, state, and local contracts. She has a proven track record in developing price- to- win strategies, conducting P&L forecasting and analysis, ensuring contract compliance, and overseeing internal audits. Carrie Ann holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU). Her expertise and dedication make her an invaluable asset to our team, contributing to our continued success.

Peter Cho PTMP, Senior Operations Manager
During his 24 years of parking management experience, Peter has been instrumental in providing measured leadership and guidance to his operational team by implementing proven systems to achieve optimal efficiency. Peter has implemented multiple municipal programs including first -time outsourced enforcement programs. He has worked closely with clients to develop policies and procedures that provide the operations with a consistent level of service. Peter has led the transition of several enforcement programs, most notably, Santa Ana, Newport Beach, San Marcos, San Leandro and San Mateo. His local knowledge and in -depth experience working in similar environments makes him a valuable resource to City of Salinas. Peter will serve in the dual role of a Transition Manager and then as the Operations Resource Manager for this program 729

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
24 Conor Buckley, VP - Municipal Operations
Conor joins the LAZ Family from Passport where he was one of their most tenured and trusted Client Success and Sales Executives. Conor prides himself on adopting the client’s perspective to secure a full analysis and delivery of enterprise solutions. Since 2015, Conor has worked closely with some of Passport’s largest and most complex municipal clients, including the cities of Toronto, Portland, Boston, and Montreal. As an Account Executive, Conor has built lasting partnerships with public and private parking operators by offering innovative technology and scalable solutions that are focused on client success. His impact on the industry goes beyond helping cities adopt technologies that address their parking and mobility needs. Conor has worked directly wit h Parking Authorities and City Councils throughout North America to gain approval and support for modern curb management policies and practices aimed at improving accessibility, reducing congestion, and enhancing customer experience. Conor is from Chapel Hill, NC, and received his bachelor’s degree from the University of North Carolina, Wilmington. Conor will provide an extra layer of technical support to the City of Salinas City-Wide Parking Enforcement program, with a main focus on ensuring the success of the City-Wide Parking Enforcement program.

Muhammad Mansoor PTMP, VP - Municipal Operations
In his 22-year parking career, Muhammad has led the implementation of multiple parking enforcement programs throughout CA. He started his parking career with Central Parking System. While at Central Parking, he was responsible for the management of multiple municipal parking management contracts including Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Long Beach, Anaheim, Carson, and Riverside. Since joining LAZ, Muhammad has spearheaded transitions of 8 new CA based contracts in the past five years, namely, Inglewood, Palo Alto, Salinas, Santa Ana, Manhattan Beach, San Leandro, San Marcos, and San Mateo. As a subject matter expert across a broad range of parking programs, Muhammad is often called on to assess operational efficiencies and the application of new technologies. Muhammad will provide regional project oversight required to ensure City of Salinas.needs are met throughout the life of the contract. Muhammad has access to all LAZ’s parking contracts, bringing best practices and lessons learned to City of Salinas and to the City-Wide Parking Enforcement program.

Robert Maroney PTMP, Executive VP - Government Services Rob Maroney joined LAZ Parking in 2015 as the Vice President of Government Services.

Rob is responsible for overseeing and supporting our rapidly expanding Government Services market, which includes municipal agencies and public private partnerships. With over 20 years of experience, Rob brings extensive experience in government operations, management, and consulting. He started his career in municipal government, and during his 12+ year career with Norfolk, VA, he served as the Director of Parking. Rob was also the Director of Parking and Transportation for Virginia Commonwealth University, overseeing the university’s parking, transportation, and fleet management programs. Rob has access to all municipal contracts currently managed by LAZ and will bring his expertise to the City of Salinas City-Wide Parking Enforcement program, if LAZ is awarded this contract.
730

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
25 Resumes
Anthony Hamilton
Newark, CA [email protected] (510) 301-4215
Experience

LAZ PARKING
Regional Director of Operations 2024-Present
• Build and maintain strong client relationships, ensuring contractual obligations, operational delivery, and client expectations are consistently met or exceeded
• Drive financial performance through P&L oversight, budget forecasting, variance analysis, expense management, and revenue optimization
• Lead, mentor, and develop managers, supervisors, and frontline employees; identify and cultivate high - potential talent to support organizational growth and succession planning. • Recruit, hire, train, and onboard employees using the LAZ Way approach; ensure timely orientation and cultural alignment within two weeks of hire.
• Oversee workforce planning, scheduling, payroll compliance, and overtime management to maximize efficiency and control labor costs
• Ensure operational excellence by maintaining compliance with company policies, client agreements, federal/state/local regulations, and audit procedures
• Deliver accurate daily, weekly, monthly, and annual financial and operational reporting to clients and regional leadership
• Champion continuous improvement, process innovation, and technology adoption to increase scalability, efficiency, and customer satisfaction
• Partner with regional leadership, clients, and vendors to execute strategic projects, programs, and initiatives that advance business objectives
• Manage safety, claims, and risk management initiatives, ensuring employees adhere to company SOPs and proper reporting procedures
• Actively participate in leadership, operational, and client meetings to align priorities, resolve challenges, and support long-term success
Regional Portfolio Manger 2023-2024
• Directed comprehensive portfolio management strategies encompassing Commercial, Hospitality, Enforcement, Valet, Traffic, Transportation, and Parking Operations, ensuring optimal efficiency and client satisfaction
• Implemented innovative solutions tailored to streamline operations across diverse sectors, resulting in substantial revenue growth and cost savings
• Conducted rigorous budgeting and forecasting for each sector, aligning financial goals with operational objectives and achieving budgetary targets consistently • Rolled out and reviewed bonus metrics with managers to ensure compliance with company values, culture, financial targets, client relations, operational standards, audits, safety protocols, and regulatory compliance • Cultivated and maintained strong client relationships through strategic planning and effective communication strategies
• Led a team of eleven managers specializing in various operational areas, providing guidance and support to enhance team performance and project success
731

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
26 • Collaborated cross- functionally with senior leadership to identify and capitalize on opportunities for business growth and operational improvement
Operations Manager- Valet, Traffic, & Parking Operations 2021-2023 • Implement Parking Access Revenue Control Systems: SKIDATA at Westfield Valley Fair • Operate a cashless yet ticketless valet system: SMS Valet • Manage a team of 40+ employees who enhance the customer experience • Oversees financials and operations of a luxury mall to ensure professional valet, traffic, and parking management
• Weekly meetings with the mall GM & AGM to ensure service, and safety standards are met • Manage Holiday Traffic needs around the property
• Radio etiquette when communicating with security, mall management, housekeeping, engineering, and team
• Organize daily huddles to review safety, performance expectations, and areas for improvement • Weekly meetings with supervisors for updates on events in the mall, staffing needs, aging report, revenue goals
• Work close with SKIDATA to repair revenue control systems to maximize revenue at location • Report recommendations to the center management to maintain a safe, clean, and fun environment for guests
• Implement LAZ Go in our surface lots to monetize the outskirts of the mall • Build incentive programs to increase productivity and morale in the workplace • Assist over 2,500 monthly parkers with any changes in their contract, and billing Education
• BA – Broadcast & Electronic Communication Arts – San Francisco State • AA – Radio & Television Broadcasting - Chabot College 732

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
27 Resume: Michael Harper
Orange, CA [email protected] (949) 244-0382
Experience

LAZ PARKING
Operations Manager – City of Salinas / On Street Parking Enforcement 2016-Present • Oversee the enforcement of parking regulations throughout the city • Educating the public as it pertains to parking regulations, • Managing eight surface lots, two parking garages, hourly and permit parking • Achieving high level of customer service and interaction with the public • Supervising a staff of 5 citation officers
• Hiring, training and mentoring all staff

CPS / SP PLUS
Facility Manager – City of Newport Beach / City of Santa Ana 2014-2016 • Oversee the collection of cash / meter maintenance and property repair, issuance of parking citations for the City of Newport Beach. Over 1500 on street meters, 30 pay stations, 10 surface lots. High summer traffic involving intense customer service including city related special events and requests • Supervise and responsible for a staff of 20 which includes citation officers, maintenance crew, supervisors • Responsible for the hiring, training and mentoring of staff • Oversee the collection and deposit of cash from on street meters and surface • Responsible for the daily supervision of 8 citation officers for the City of Santa Ana’s street sweeping program

Operations Manager – The Toll Roads 2008-2014
• Responsible for 54 miles of toll roads, ten toll plazas, 46 toll lanes while managing a yearly budget of $3.2 million dollars at a 24/7 operation
• Manage and responsible for a staff of 86 employees including hiring, training and mentoring of staff. • In FY13 the operation collected over $32 million dollars in cash tolls while processing over 12 million customer transactions while maintaining an error rate of 0.08% error rate

LOCKHEED-MARTIN / PRWT
Shift Manager – The Toll Roads 1996-2008
• Oversee the day to day operation of the San Joaquin Hills Corridor • 24/7 operation with a staff of 35 employees
• Responsible for the collection, processing and deposit of high volumes of cash collection and while maintaining a high level of customer service
• Hiring, training and mentoring of staff

733

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Project Staffing | City of Salinas
28 R. A. MARTIN CO
Senior Right of Way Agent / Supervisor 1988-1996
• Managed office and field employees handling various power projects in Southern California • Responsible for procuring property easements, permits, supervised survey teams in the field, and obtaining legal agreement contracts from both public and private property owners • maintaining a high level of customer service.
• Hiring, training and mentoring of staff

Education
• Fullerton College Fullerton, CA
o Associate of Arts Degree
o Fred Pryer management courses

Interests
• Volunteer for animal rescue
• Senior citizen physical rehab
• Camping
• Backpacking

734

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Proposal Exceptions + Proposal Cost Sheets & Rates| City of Salinas 29 7. PROPOSAL EXCEPTIONS
LAZ Parking has reviewed the City of Salinas’s Request for Proposals, including all stated conditions, requirements, and the Sample Agreement for Services (Attachment C). After careful review, LAZ Parking takes no exceptions or requests for changes to the City’s RFP documents or Sample Agreement.

As the current parking enforcement services provider for the City of Salinas since 2016, LAZ Parking has been operating successfully under the same terms and conditions outlined in this solicitation. Our long- standing partnership with the City has been bui lt on mutual trust, transparency, and compliance with all contractual obligations.

LAZ fully understands and accepts all provisions of the City’s RFP, Scope of Services, and Sample Agreement, and is prepared to continue performance under these same terms without modification. This approach ensures seamless contract continuity, uninterrup ted service delivery, and the continued success of the City’s parking enforcement program.

Accordingly, LAZ Parking respectfully confirms that no exceptions, revisions, or alternative language are proposed to the City’s RFP or Sample Agreement.

8. PROPOSAL COSTS SHEET & RATES

Please see our attached cost proposal, in the format requested by the City.

We have also included this form, as well as our audited financial statements, in the required attachments section at the end of this proposal document

735

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
30 9. ATTACHMENTS
AUDITED FINANCIALS 2023 & 2024

736

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
31 737

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
32 738

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
33 739

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
34 740

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
35 741

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
36 742

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
37 743

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
38 744

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
39 745

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
40 746

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
41 ATTACHMENT A – PROPOSER’S INFORMATION FORM

747

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
42 748

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
43 749

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
44 750

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
45 751

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
46 752

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
47 753

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
48 ATTACHMENT D – SAMPLE TABLE, QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM RELATIVE TO CITY’S NEEDS Project Name Client Description of work
performed
Total Project Cost Percentage of work
firm as responsible for
Period work was
completed
Client contact
information*
San Mateo Enforcement
Program
City of San Mateo / San
Mateo Police
Department
Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$7.1M 100% Nov 2019 - Present Sgt. Craig Collum
Phone: 650-522-7742
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.

West Hollywood
Enforcement Program
City of West Hollywood Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$14M 100% July 2020 – Present Vince Guarino
Phone: 323-848-6426
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.

Burbank Enforcement
Program
City of Burbank /
Burbank Police
Department
Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$6.5M 100% April 2023 - Present Emil Brimway
Phone: 818.238.3106
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No

Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.

Santa Ana Enforcement City of Santa Ana /
Santa Ana Police
Department
Citywide parking
enforcement services.
$4.7M 100% July 2018 Yolanda Bautista
Phone: 714.245.8225
[email protected]

Did your firm meet the project schedule (Circle one): Yes No Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project: LAZ Parking has consistently delivered all contracted services for this City on schedule, within budget, and without a single cost overrun or service interruption, demonstrating our disciplined project management and unwavering commitment to operational excellence.
* Include Name, Title, and Phone Number
754

City-Wide Parking Enforcement
Attachments | City of Salinas
49 ATTACHMENT E – COST PROPOSAL FORMAT

755
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#25-539, Version: 1
..Title
Zoning Code Amendment 2025-001; Rescind Section 37-50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code), remove and modify applicable Zoning Code Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions and development regulations and apply applicable State ADU law for the processing of ADU applications ..Recommended Action
Consider finding Zoning Code Amendment 2025-001 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305; and adopt an Ordinance to comply amending Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37-50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37-10.250 ("A" definitions), modify the ADU development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37-30-060, 37-30-110, 37-30.160, 37-30.390, and 37-30.430, and apply applicable State ADU Law to process ADU applications.

City of Salinas Printed on 2/20/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
756

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2025
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: COURTNEY GROSSMAN, PLANNING MANAGER
BY: THOMAS WILES, SENIOR PLANNER
TITLE: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2025 -001; RESCIND SECTION 37 -

50.250 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) OF CHAPTER 37 OF

THE SALINAS MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING CODE), REMOVE

AND MODIFY APPLICABLE ZONING CODE ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNIT (ADU) DEFINITIONS AND DEVELOPME NT

REGULATIONS AND APPLY APPLICABLE STATE ADU LAW

FOR THE PROCESSING OF ADU APPLICATIONS

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion that the City Council 1) find Zoning Code Amendment 2025 -001 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 and 2) adopt an Ordinance to amend Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37 -50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37 -10.250 (“A” definitions), modify the ADU development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37-30-060, 37-30-110, 37-30.160, 37-30.390, and 37-30.430, and apply applicable State ADU Law to process ADU applications.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City’s ADU Ordinance is out of compliance with State ADU Law. Chapter 37, Article VI, Division 14 provides for a process whereby all Zoning Code Amendments are brought before the City Council for a final decision. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment amends Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37 -50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37-10.250 (“A” definitions), modify the ADU development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37-30-060, 37-30- 110, 37-30.160, 37-30.390, and 37-30.430, and apply applicable State standards for the processing of ADU applications. An updated ADU ordinance is being prepared as part of Phase One of the Zoning Code Update currently underway and scheduled for completion in spring 2026.

As the proposed action involves the adoption of an ordinance, should the City Council unanimously vote in favor of adoption the ordinance would be adopted on the same night as its introduction. (Salinas Charter section 11.3) If the City Council does not vote unanimously in favor 757
Page | 2
of adoption, the ordinance would come back at the City Council’s next meeting for adoption.

BACKGROUND:

Zoning Code Amendment 2025 -001 (ZCA 2025 -001) rescinds Section 37 -50.250 [(Accessory Dwelling Units) (ADU)] of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code). Both Zoning Code Sections 37-10.250 and 37-50.250 were originally established pursuant to Ordinance No. 2463 (Zoning Code), which was adopted by the City Council on November 7, 2006. Zoning Code Section 37-10.250 was subsequently amended by the City Council pursuant to Ordinance s 2507 which was adopted on May 18, 2010, No. 2581 which was adopted on December 6, 2016, and No. 2605 on July 3, 2018. Zoning C ode Section 37 -50.250 was also amended by above referenced Ordinance No. 2581 and No. 2626 which was adopted by the Council on November 5, 2019.

State ADU Law:

On January 1, 2020, after the latest City revision to Zoning Code Section 37 -50.250, California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 became effective. Section 65852.2 allowed for the development of ADUs and Section 65852.22 allowed for the development of Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs). On March 25, 2024, these Government Code Sections were renamed to the following:

Government Code Sections 66314 – 66332 (ADUs)
Government Code Sections 66333 – 66339 (JADUs)
Government Code Sections 66340 – 66342 (ADU Home Sales)

Per State law, Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) are allowed to be created within the walls of a proposed or existing single-family residence and shall contain no more than 500 square feet.

JADUs offer additional housing options. They may share central systems, contain a basic kitchen utilizing small plug-in appliances, may share a bathroom with the primary dwelling, all to reduce development costs. JADUs present no additional stress on utility services or infrastructure because they simply repurpose existing space within the residence and do not expand the dwellings planned occupancy. JADUs are only allowed for owner -occupied properties unless the owner is another governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization. ADUs have no owner -occupied requirements. Development of JADUs are governed by Government Code Section 66333 through 66339.

The above referenced California Government Code Sections are not consistent with the City’s current ADU Ordinance (Zoning Code Sections 37-50.250). Because of this inconsistency, since 2020, staff has processed both ADUs and JADUs pursuant to State ADU Law and the administrative building permit process. To avoid confusion, the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) recommends that the City rescind the current ADU Ordinance and follow the State ADU Law and guidelines until a compliant ADU ordinance is adopted.

Analysis:

The rescinding of the ADU Ordinance requires that the existing ADU definitions and development 758
Page | 3
regulations be modified to comply with State ADU Law. Currently, ADUs are defined in Zoning Code Section 37-10.250 as either “Interior” or “Other” as stated below. The revisions in the ADU definitions would remove the “Interior” and “Other” definitions and modify the ADU definitio n so that it is consistent with State ADU Law. In addition, the use classifications of Agricultural, Residential, Public/Semipublic, and New Urbanism Zoning District would be modified to be consistent with the new ADU definitions and State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify and remove the following “Accessory Dwelling Unit” definitions from Section 37-10.250 (“A” definitions) as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

“Sec. 37-10.250. – “A” definitions.

Accessory Dwelling Unit. An attached or a detached residential dwelling unit defined as either an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) or a Junior Accessory Dwelling (JADU) that is constructed in compliance with State ADU Law. which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more p ersons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation, which is located on the same parcel as a single -family detached dwelling unit. An accessory dwelling unit must contain at least one hundred fifty square feet of f loor area and may consist of an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of Health and Safety Code; or a manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.

Accessory Dwelling Unit, Interior. An accessory dwelling unit which is constructed in the R -L district entirely within the existing and legally created space of a single-family detached dwelling unit or accessory structure.

Accessory Dwelling Unit, Other. An accessory dwelling unit which is constructed either as a new detached accessory structure; as an addition to an existing single-family detached dwelling unit or an existing accessory structure; or entirely within the existing and legally created space of a single- family detached dwelling unit or accessory structure but not in the R-L district.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-020, Table 37-30.10, and Footnote 6 [Agricultural (A) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.10

Agricultural (A) District Use Classifications

Land Use A Additional Use Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P (6)

(6) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

759
Page | 4
The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-060, Table 37-30.30, and Footnote 5 [Residential Low Density (R -L-5.5) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.30

Residential Low District (R-L) Use Classifications

Land Use R-L-5.5 Additional Use Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Interior P (5)
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P (5)

(5) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-110, Table 37-30.50, and Footnote 7 [Residential Medium Density (R -M) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.50

Residential Medium Density (R-M) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use R-M-3.6 R-M-2.9 Additional Use
Regulations
Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P P (7)

(7) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-160, Table 37-30.70, and Footnote 8 [Residential High Density (R-H) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.70

Residential High Density (R-H) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use R-H-2.1 R-H-1.8 Additional Use
760
Page | 5
Regulations
Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P P (8)

(8) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-390, Table 37-30.170, delete Footnote 12 applicability to Accessory Dwelling Units and add Footnote 15 [Public/Semipublic (PS) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.170

Public/Semipublic (PS) Use Classifications

Land Use PS Additional Use Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other CUP P (12)(13)(15)

(15) Accessory dwelling units shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37 -30-430, Table 37-30.190, and Footnote 6 [New Urbanism (NU) Zoning Districts] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.190

New Urbanism (NU) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use NE (Low) NG-1
(Medium)
NG-2
(High)
VC Additional
Use
Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling
Units, Other
P P P NP (6)

(6) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would also rescind Section 37-50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline 761
Page | 6
format):

“Sec. 37-50.250. - Accessory dwelling units.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to comply with the requirements of the California Government Code relating to accessory dwelling units. In the event of any conflict between this section and the California Government Code, the California Government Code shall prevail. An accessory dwelling unit conforming to the provisions of this section shall be approved minister ially within the time limits specified by Government Code Section 65852.2 or any successor provisions. (b) Where Permitted.
(1) Accessory dwelling units, interior are allowed as a permitted use in the R -L district.
(2) Accessory dwelling units, other are allowed as a permitted use in an A, R, or NU district, subject to subsection (d) below. All accessory dwelling units are permitted only on lots with one single-family detached dwelling unit and no other dwelling units.
(3) No accessory dwelling units shall be permitted in a development subject to a planned unit development permit approved under Article IV, Division 13 of Chapter 37, or any applicable predecessor or successor sections of this Code, unless accessory dwelling units are expressly authorized by such planned unit development permit.
(4) A maximum of one accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted per lot or parcel. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold separately from the principal dwelling unit.
(c) Development Regulations and Design Standards —Accessory dwelling uni t, interior.
(1) The accessory dwelling unit must have exterior access independent from the existing single-family detached dwelling unit.
(2) Side and rear setbacks must be determined to be sufficient for fire safety by the building official.
(3) No new or separate utility connection directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility may be required.
(4) Sprinklers may not be required for the accessory dwelling unit unless they are required for the existing single-family detached dwelling unit. (5) The total floor area of an accessory dwelling unit, interior, shall not exceed the greater of one-thousand two-hundred square feet or fifty percent of the existing living area of the primary residence.
(d) Development Regulations and Design Standards - Accessory dwelling unit, other.
(1) Floor Area.
(A) The total floor area of a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed a maximum of one -thousand two -hundred square feet of gross floor area.
(B) The total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed a maximum of fifty-percent of the existing living area of the 762
Page | 7
primary residence, not to exceed a maximum of one -thousand two- hundred square feet.
(C) Accessory dwelling units that require additional floor area for the unit are prohibited on the second floor of a single -family detached dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units may be located within an existing second floor of a single -family detached dwelling unit subject to the requirements of subsection (c) of this section. (2) Design. The exterior design of the accessory dwelling unit shall be in harmony with the principal dwelling unit. This shall be accomplished through the use of building materials, architectural design, height, scale, exterior colors, and finishes that are compatible with the principal dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units shall be designed so as not to adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The design standards of the base zoning distr ict shall apply. No passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit. (3) Sprinklers. Sprinklers may not be required for the accessory dwelling unit unless they are required for the existing single -family detached dwelling unit.
(e) Other Development Standards. Except as modified by this section, the accessory dwelling unit shall conform to all applicable development regulations established for single -family detached dwelling units in the underlying zoning dist rict, including without limitation, the maximum height, required yards, minimum usable open space requirements for single-family detached dwelling units in the applicable zoning district, and distance between structures.
(f) Parking. One off-street parking space shall be provided for each bedroom in the accessory dwelling unit, and parking required for the single -family dwelling units shall be provided on the same site in accordance with Section 37-50.360, off-street parking and loading spaces regulations. A minimum of one off-street parking space shall be provided for an efficiency unit off -street parking for accessory dwelling units may be provided as tandem parking on an existing legal driveway or in setbacks, excluding the front or side -corner setbacks of a site; however off -street parking spaces for accessory dwelling units are not required in any of the following instances:
(1) The accessory dwelling unit is located within one -half mile of a public transit stop.
(2) The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
(3) The accessory dwelling unit is an "accessory dwelling unit, interior" as defined in this Chapter 37.
(4) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
(5) When there is a car share vehicle pickup location located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.

Notwithstanding the above, if the acc essory dwelling unit replaces an existing garage, carport, or covered parking structure, replacement spaces must be provided 763
Page | 8
to meet the requirements of Division 2 of this Chapter 37 . Such replacement spaces may be provided as garaged spaces, covered spaces, uncovered spaces on a legal driveway, tandem spaces, or mechanical parking lifts on the same lot as the primary residence. As used in this subsection (f), "driveway" shall mean a private roadway or travel way and its access point from a public street for the exclusive use of the occupants of a property and their guests.
(g) Density. An accessory dwelling unit which conforms to the requirements of this section shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located, and shall be deemed to be a residential use, consistent with the Salinas general plan and zoning designation for the lot. (h) Deed Restriction. The owner of the parcel of land upon which the accessory dwelling unit is proposed to be located shall execute a deed restriction, running with the land, in a form satisfactory to and approved by the city, which states that the second dwelling unit shall not be rented for terms less than thirty days, that the lot shall be developed and maintained in conformance with this section, and that the requirements of this section are binding upon any successor in ownership of the property. Such deed restriction shall be filed by the city planner for recordation by the Monterey County recorder's office prior to issuance of any building permits for the accessory dwelling unit.
(i) Administrative Fee. The city may charge an administrative fee for monitoring compliance with the provisions of this section as determined by the city council.”

The rescinding of Zoning Code Section 37 -50.250 requires the City to continue to process applications for ADUs and JADUs pursuant to State law as per Government Code Section 66316 until a City Ordinance for the processing of ADUs is approved by the State.

Findings:

Findings in support of the Amendment are incorporated in the attached draft Ordinance. The City Council may approve Zoning Code Amendment 2025 if the findings set forth in the proposed Ordinance are established.

November 19, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting:

On November 19, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council find Zoning Code Amendment 2025-001 exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and recommended that the Council approve the Amendment (see attached Planning Commission Resolution 2025-12).

Noticing:

On November 27, 2025, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Monterey County Weekly, a newspaper of general circulat ion. As per Zoning Code Section 37 -60.400(c), it was published as a 1/8 th page notice. On November 20, 2025, a Notice of Public Hearing was also posted at City Hall and the Permit Center.

764
Page | 9
Time Consideration:

The proposed project is a Zoning Code Amendment, which is a legislative act and is not subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (PSA).

Alternatives Available to the Council:

The City Council has the following alternatives:

1. Affirm the findings set forth in the attached Ordinance, find the Amendment exempt from CEQA and introduce and then adopt the Ordinance with modifications; or

2. Find that the Amendment is not appropriate and establish findings at the public hearing denying the Amendment.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The environmental impacts of the project have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is categorically exempt (Class 5) from further environmental analysis per CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations).

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

Yes.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

This action supports the Council’s Strategic Goal of Housing/Affordable Housing by clarifying guidelines for processing the entitlement and construction of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The Community Development Department and the City Attorney’s Office coordinated on the preparation of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment.

FISCAL AND SUSTABILITY IMPACT:

There is no direct impact to the General Fund associated with this Amendment.

ATTACHMENTS:

Draft City Council Ordinance
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-12
Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 19, 2025 without attachments

765
Page | 10

766

ORDINANCE NO. ________ (N.C.S)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 37 OF THE SALINAS MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING CODE) TO RESCIND SECTION 37-50.250 (ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNITS), REMOVE AND MODIFY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) DEFINITIONS OF SECTION 37-10.250 (“A” DEFINITIONS), AND MODIFY THE ADU DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF SECTIONS 37-30.020, 37-30-060, 37-30-110, 37-

30.160, 37-30.390, AND 37-30.430, AND APPLY APPLICABLE STATE ADU LAW FOR

THE PROCESSING OF ADU APPLICATIONS
(ZCA 2025-001)

City Attorney Impartial Analysis
The proposed ordinance amends the Salinas Zoning Code to delete the provisions applicable to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The deletions are necessary to bring the Salinas Zoning Code’s regulations of ADUs into compliance with State law. By deleting the provisions applicable to ADUs, the City would apply the State’s regulations related to ADUs.

WHEREAS, on November 7, 2006, the Salinas City Council, adopted Ordinance Number 2463 replacing the then existing Zoning Code; and

WHEREAS, the Salinas City Council has amended various provisions of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (“Zoning Code”) to allow for general changes, language clarification, and minor corrections; and

WHEREAS, On January 1, 2020, after the latest City revision to Zoning Code Section 37-

50.250, California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 became effective; and

WHEREAS, Section 65852.2 allowed for the development of ADUs and Section 65852.22 allowed for the development of Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs). On March 25, 2024, these Government Code Sections were renamed Government Code Sections 66314 – 66332 (ADUs), Government Code Sections 66333 – 66339 (JADUs), and Government Code Sect ions 66340 – 66342 (ADU Home Sales); and

WHEREAS, the City’s ADU Ordinance has not been updated to be compliant with State ADU Law; and

WHEREAS, to avoid confusion, the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) recommends that the City rescind the current ADU Ordinance and follow the State ADU Law and guidelines until a compliant ADU ordinance is adopted; and

WHEREAS, an updated ADU ordinance is being prepared as part of Phase One of the Zoning Code Update currently underway and scheduled for completion in spring 2026; and

WHEREAS, on November 19, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Salinas Planning Commission recommended that the City Council introduce and adopt Zoning Code Amendment 2025-001, to amend Chapter 37 of the Salinas Mu nicipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 767

37-50.250 ( Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37-10.250 (“A” definitions), modify development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37 -30-060, 37-30-110, 37 -30.160, 37 -30.390, and 37 -30.430, and apply applicable State standards for the processing of Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) applications; and

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council weighed the evidence, including the Staff Report which is on file at the Community Development Department together with the record of environmental review and hereby finds that the following amendment will not have the effect of reversing policies of the Salinas General Plan or other plans and policies previously adopted by the City Council and the City Council finds the project to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as follows:

Categorical Exemption:

1. The project has been found to be a Class 5 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Guidelines Section 15305 of the Guidelines to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is a response to a request from the State of California to amend Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37-50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37 -10.250 (“ A” definitions), modify development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37-30-060, 37-30-110, 37-30.160, 37-30.390, and 37-

30.430, and apply applicable State standards for the processing of Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) applications.

WHEREAS, the Salinas City Council adopts the following findings, as set forth in Zoning Code Section 37 -60.1120, as the basis for its introduction and adoption of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment:

Zoning Code Amendment 2025-001:

1. The Amendment is consistent with the Salinas General Plan and other plans and policies adopted by the Salinas City Council.

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment amends Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37 -50.250 ( Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37 -10.250 (“ A” definitions), modify development regulations of S ections 37 -30.020, 37 -30-060, 37 -30- 110, 37 -30.160, 37 -30.390, and 37 -30.430, and apply applicable State ADU Law and guidelines for the processing of Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) applications.

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment would remove the existing Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance along with removal and modification of ADU definitions and the modification of Zoning Code development regulations for ADU so that the Zoning Code is in consistent with applicable State ADU law . As a result, ZCA 2025-001 would be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code.

768

2. The Amendment will not have the effect of reversing the policies of the Salinas General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan, and other plans and policies adopted by the Salinas City Council.

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment amends Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37 -50.250 ( Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessor y Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37 -10.250 (“ A” definitions), modify development regulations of S ections 37 -30.020, 37 -30-060, 37 -30- 110, 37 -30.160, 37 -30.390, and 37 -30.430, and apply applicable State ADU Law and guidelines for the processing of Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) applications.

The Zoning Code Amendment would be consistent with Goal H -1 of the General Plan Housing Element by providing a range of housing types and a variety of affordability levels to address existing and projected housing construction needs in Salinas. It would also be consistent with Goal H -3 of the General Plan Housing Element by assisting in ensuring that all segments of the community have access to safe and decent housing that meets their diverse needs. The Zoning Code Amendment would allow for the continued processing of ADU applications pursuant to applicable State ADU Law. In addition, the City is currently drafting a new ADU Ordinance which would be consistent with State ADU Law.

3. The Amendment would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent zoning districts.

The Zoning Code Amendment is an amendment to the text of the Zoning Code and would not rezone or create new zoning districts. Therefore, the Zoning Code Amendment would not create any isolated districts unrelated to adjacent zoning districts.

4. The City has the capability to provide public utilities, roads, and services to serve the uses allowed by the proposed amendment.

Salinas is an urbanized area and public infrastru cture is presently in place to serve most uses. The proposed Amendment would not create the need for additional infrastructure.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF SALINAS AS FOLLOWS: (Revisions are shown in underline/strikethrough text)

SECTION 1. Remove the following definitions from Zoning Code Section 37-10.250 as follows:

“Sec. 37-10.250. – “A” definitions.

Accessory Dwelling Unit. An attached or a detached residential dwelling unit defined as either an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) or a Junior Accessory Dwelling (JADU) that is constructed in compliance with State ADU law. which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation, which is located on the same parcel as a single - family detached dwelling unit. An accessory dwelling unit must contain at least one hundred fifty square feet of floor area and may consist of an efficiency unit, as defined in 769

Section 17958.1 of Health and Safety Code; or a manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.

Accessory Dwelling Unit, Interior. An accessory dwelling unit which is constructed in the R-L district entirely within the existing and legally created space of a single -family detached dwelling unit or accessory structure.

Accessory Dwelling Unit, Other. An accessory dwelling unit which is constructed either as a new detached accessory structure; as an addition to an existing single-family detached dwelling unit or an existing accessory structure; or entirely within the existing and legally created space of a single -family detached dwelling unit or accessory structure but not in the R-L district.

SECTION 2. Modify Zoning Code Section 37 -30-020, Table 37-30.10, and Footnote 6 [Agricultural (A) Zoning District] as follows:

Table 37-30.10

Agricultural (A) District Use Classifications

Land Use A Additional Use Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units ,
Other
P (6)

(6) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU law.

SECTION 3. Modify Zoning Code Section 37 -30-060, Table 37-30.30, and Footnote 6 [Residential Low Density (R-L-5.5) Zoning District] as follows:

Table 37-30.30

Residential Low District (R-L) Use Classifications

Land Use R-L-5.5 Additional Use Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units ,
Interior
P (5)
Accessory Dwelling Units,
Other
P (5)

770

(5) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU law.

SECTION 4. Modify Zoning Code Section 37 -30-110, Table 37-30.50, and Footnote 7 [Residential Medium Density (R-M) Zoning District] as follows:

Table 37-30.50

Residential Medium Density (R-M) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use R-M-3.6 R-M-2.9 Additional Use
Regulations
Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units,
Other
P P (7)

(7) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU law.

SECTION 5. Modify Zoning Code Section 37 -30-160, Table 37-30.70, and Footnote 8 [Residential High Density (R-H) Zoning District] as follows:

Table 37-30.70

Residential High Density (R-H) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use R-H-2.1 R-H-1.8 Additional Use
Regulations
Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units,
Other
P P (8)

(8) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot w ith a single -family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU law.

SECTION 6. Modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-390, Table 37-30.170, delete Footnote 12 applicability to Accessory Dwelling Units and add Footnote 15 [Public/Semipublic (PS) Zoning District] as follows:

Table 37-30.170

Public/Semipublic (PS) Use Classifications

Land Use PS Additional Use Regulations
771

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units ,
Other
CUP P (12)(13)(15)

(15) Accessory dwelling units shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU law.

SECTION 7. Modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-430, Table 37-30.190, and Footnote 6 [New Urbanism (NU) Zoning Districts] as follows:

Table 37-30.190

New Urbanism (NU) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use NE (Low) NG-1
(Medium)
NG-2
(High)
VC Additional
Use
Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory
Dwelling Units ,
Other
P P P NP (6)

(6) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU law.

SECTION 8. Rescind Section 37 -50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) as follows:

“Sec. 37-50.250. - Accessory dwelling units.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to comply with the requirements of the California Government Code relating to accessory dwelling units. In the event of any conflict between this section and the California Government Code, the California Government Code shall prevail. An accessory dwelling unit conforming to the provisions of this section shall be approved ministerially within the time limits specified by Government Code Section 65852.2 or any successor provisions. (b) Where Permitted.
(1) Accessory dwelling units, interior are allowed as a permitted use in the R - L district.
(2) Accessory dwelling units, other are allowed as a permitted use in an A, R, or NU district, subject to subsection (d) below. All accessory dwelling units are permitted only on lots with one single -family detached dwelling unit and no other dwelling units.
(3) No accessory dwelling units shall be permitted in a development subject to a planned unit development permit approved under Article IV, Division 772

13 of Chapter 37, or any applicable predecessor or successor sections of this Code, unless accessory dwelling units are expressly authorized by such planned unit development permit.
(4) A maximum of one accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted per lot or parcel. An accessory dwelling un it shall not be sold separately from the principal dwelling unit.
(c) Development Regulations and Design Standards —Accessory dwelling unit, interior.
(1) The accessory dwelling unit must have exterior access independent from the existing single-family detached dwelling unit.
(2) Side and rear setbacks must be determined to be sufficient for fire safety by the building official.
(3) No new or separate utility connection directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility may be required.
(4) Sprinklers may not be required for the accessory dwelling unit unless they are required for the existing single-family detached dwelling unit. (5) The total floor area of an accessory dwelling unit, interior, shall not exceed the greater of one-thousand two-hundred square feet or fifty percent of the existing living area of the primary residence.
(d) Development Regulations and Design Standards - Accessory dwelling unit, other.
(1) Floor Area.
(A) The total floor area of a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed a maximum of one -thousand two -hundred square feet of gross floor area.
(B) The total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed a maximum of fifty-percent of the existing living area of the primary residence, not to exceed a maximum of one-thousand two- hundred square feet.
(C) Accessory dwelling units that require additional floor area for the unit are prohibited on the second floor of a single -family detached dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units may be located within a n existing second floor of a single -family detached dwelling unit subject to the requirements of subsection (c) of this section. (2) Design. The exterior design of the accessory dwelling unit shall be in harmony with the principal dwelling unit. This shall be accomplished through the use of building materials, architectural design, height, scale, exterior colors, and finishes that are compatible with the principal dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units shall be designed so as not to adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The design standards of the base zoning district shall apply. No passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit. (3) Sprinklers. Sprinklers may not be required for th e accessory dwelling unit unless they are required for the existing single -family detached dwelling unit.
(e) Other Development Standards. Except as modified by this section, the accessory dwelling unit shall conform to all applicable development regulatio ns established for single -family detached dwelling units in the underlying zoning district, 773

including without limitation, the maximum height, required yards, minimum usable open space requirements for single-family detached dwelling units in the applicable zoning district, and distance between structures.
(f) Parking. One off-street parking space shall be provided for each bedroom in the accessory dwelling unit, and parking required for the single -family dwelling units shall be provided on the same site in accordance with Section 37-50.360, off-street parking and loading spaces regulations. A minimum of one off-street parking space shall be provided for an efficiency unit off -street parking for accessory dwelling units may be provided as tandem parking on an existing legal driveway or in setbacks, excluding the front or side -corner setbacks of a site; howeve r off-street parking spaces for accessory dwelling units are not required in any of the following instances:
(1) The accessory dwelling unit is located within one -half mile of a public transit stop.
(2) The accessory dwelling unit is located within an arch itecturally and historically significant historic district.
(3) The accessory dwelling unit is an "accessory dwelling unit, interior" as defined in this Chapter 37.
(4) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
(5) When there is a car share vehicle pickup location located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.

Notwithstanding the above, if the accessory dwelling unit replaces an existing garage, carport, or covered parking structure, replacement spaces must be provided to meet the requirements of Division 2 of this Chapter 37 . Such replacement spaces may be provided as garaged spaces, covered spaces, uncovered spaces on a legal driveway, tandem spaces, or mechanical parking lifts on the same lot as the primary residence. As used in this subsection (f), "driveway" shall mean a private roadway or travel way and its access point from a public street for the exclusive use of the occupants of a property and their guests.
(g) Density. An accessory dwelling unit which conforms to the re quirements of this section shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located, and shall be deemed to be a residential use, consistent with the Salinas general plan and zoning designation for the lot. (h) Deed Rest riction. The owner of the parcel of land upon which the accessory dwelling unit is proposed to be located shall execute a deed restriction, running with the land, in a form satisfactory to and approved by the city, which states that the second dwelling unit shall not be rented for terms less than thirty days, that the lot shall be developed and maintained in conformance with this section, and that the requirements of this section are binding upon any successor in ownership of the property. Such deed restriction shall be filed by the city planner for recordation by the Monterey County recorder's office prior to issuance of any building permits for the accessory dwelling unit.
(i) Administrative Fee. The city may charge an administrative fee for monitoring compliance with the provisions of this section as determined by the city council.”

774

SECTION 9. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days from and after its adoption.

SECTION 10. The Salinas City Clerk is hereby directed to cause the following summary of this ordinance to be published by one (1) insertion in The Monterey Herald , a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Salinas and hereby designated for that purpose by the Salinas City Council:

“An Ordinance amending Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to comply with a State request to rescind Section 37 -50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37 -10.250 (“A” definitions), modify the ADU development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37-30- 060, 37 -30-110, 37 -30.160, 37 -30.390, and 37 -30.430, and apply applicable State standards for the processing of ADU applications. (ZCA 2025-001).”

SECTION 11. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

The Salinas City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

This Ordinance was introduced and read on the 9 th of December 2025, and passed and adopted on December 9, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED

_________________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST

________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

775

APPROVED AS TO FORM

___________________________
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney

776
777
778
779
780

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT

DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2025

TO: PLANNING COMMISSION

FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR

COURTNEY GROSSMAN, PLANNING MANAGER

BY: THOMAS WILES, SENIOR PLANNER

TITLE: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 202 5-001; RESCIND SECTION 37-50.250 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) OF CHAPTER 37 OF THE SALINAS

MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING CODE) , REMOVE AND MODIFY

APPLICABLE ZONING CODE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU)

DEFINITIONS AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND APPLY

APPLICABLE STATE ADU LAW FOR THE PROCESSING OF ADU

APPLICATIONS

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to recommend that the City Council 1) find Zoning Code Amendment 2025 -001 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 and 2) adopt an Ordinance to comply amending Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37-50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37 -10.250 (“A” definitions), modify the ADU development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37-30-060, 37-30- 110, 37-30.160, 37-30.390, and 37-30.430, and apply applicable State ADU Law to process ADU applications.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City’s ADU Ordinance is out of compliance with State ADU Law. Chapter 37, Article VI, Division 14 provides for a process whereby all Zoning Code Amendments are brought before the City Council for a final decision. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment amends Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to rescind Section 37 -50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), remove and modify Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) definitions of Section 37-10.250 (“A” definitions), modify the ADU development regulations of Sections 37-30.020, 37-30-060, 37-30- 110, 37-30.160, 37-30.390, and 37-30.430, and apply applicable State standards for the processing 781
Page | 2

of ADU applications. An updated ADU ordinance is being prepared as part of Phase One of the Zoning Code Update currently underway and scheduled for completion in spring 2026.

DISCUSSION:

Background:

Zoning Code Amendment 2025 -001 (ZCA 2025 -001) rescinds Section 37 -50.250 [(Accessory Dwelling Units) (ADU)] of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code). Both Zoning Code Sections 37-10.250 and 37-50.250 were originally established pursuant to Ordinance No. 2463 (Zoning Code), which was approved by the City Council on November 7, 2006. Zoning Code Section 37-10.250 was subsequently amended by the City Council pursuant to Ordinances 2507 which was approved on May 18, 2010, No. 2581 which was approved on December 6, 2016, and No. 2605 on July 3, 2018. Zoning Code Section 37 -50.250 was also amended by above referenced Ordinance No. 2581 and No. 2626 which was approved by the Council on November 5, 2019.

State ADU Law:

On January 1, 2020, after the latest City revision to Zoning Code Section 37 -50.250, California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 became effective. Section 65852.2 allowed for the development of ADUs and Section 65852.22 allowed for the development of Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs). On March 25, 2024, these Government Code Sections were renamed to the following:

Government Code Sections 66314 – 66332 (ADUs)
Government Code Sections 66333 – 66339 (JADUs)
Government Code Sections 66340 – 66342 (ADU Home Sales)

Per State law, Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) are allowed to be created within the walls of a proposed or existing single-family residence and shall contain no more than 500 square feet.

JADUs offer additional housing options. They may share central systems, contain a basic kitchen utilizing small plug-in appliances, may share a bathroom with the primary dwelling, all to reduce development costs. JADUs present no additional stress on utility services or infrastructure because they simply repurpose existing space within the residence and do not expand the dwellings planned occupancy. JADUs are only allowed for owner -occupied properties unless the owner is another governmental agency, land trust, or housing o rganization. ADUs have no owner -occupied requirements. Development of JADUs are governed by Government Code Section 66333 through 66339.

The above referenced California Government Code Sections are not consistent with the City’s current ADU Ordinance (Zoning Code Sections 37-50.250). Because of this inconsistency, since 2020, staff has processed both of ADUs and JADUs pursuant to State ADU Law and the administrative building permit process. To avoid confusion, the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) recommends that the City rescind the current ADU Ordinance and follow the State ADU Law and guidelines until a compliant ADU ordinance is adopted. 782
Page | 3

Analysis:

The rescinding of the ADU Ordinance requires that the existing ADU definitions and development regulations be modified so that they comply with State ADU Law. Currently, ADU’s in the City are defined in Zoning Code Section 37-10.250 as either “Interior” or “Other” as stated below. The revisions in the ADU definitions would remove the “Interior” and “Other” definitions and modify the ADU definition so that it is consistent with State ADU Law. In addition, the classifications of Agricultural, Residential, Public/Semipublic, and New Urbanism Zoning District use classifications have been modified so that they are consistent with the new ADU definitions and State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify and remove the following “Accessory Dwelling Unit” definitions from Section 37-10.250 (“A” definitions) as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

“Sec. 37-10.250. – “A” definitions.

Accessory Dwelling Unit. An attached or a detached residential dwelling unit defined as either an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) or a Junior Accessory Dwelling (JADU) that is constructed in compliance with State ADU Law. which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation, which is located on the same parcel as a single -family detached dwelling unit. An accessory dwelling unit must contain at least one hundred fifty square feet of floor area and may consist of an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of Health and Safety Code; or a manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.

Accessory Dwelling Unit, Interior. An accessory dwelling unit which is constructed in the R -L district entirely within the existing and legally created space of a single-family detached dwelling unit or accessory structure.

Accessory Dwelling Unit, Other. An accessory dwelling unit which is constructed either as a new detached accessory structure; as an addition to an existing single-family detached dwelling unit or an existing accessory structure; or entirely within the existing and legally created space of a single- family detached dwelling unit or accessory structure but not in the R-L district.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-020, Table 37-30.10, and Footnote 6 [Agricultural (A) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.10

Agricultural (A) District Use Classifications

Land Use A Additional Use Regulations

783
Page | 4

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P (6)

(6) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-060, Table 37-30.30, and Footnote 6 [Residential Low Density (R -L-5.5) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.30

Residential Low District (R-L) Use Classifications

Land Use R-L-5.5 Additional Use Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Interior P (5)
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P (5)

(5) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-110, Table 37-30.50, and Footnote 7 [Residential Medium Density (R -M) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.50

Residential Medium Density (R-M) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use R-M-3.6 R-M-2.9 Additional Use
Regulations
Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P P (7)

(7) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-160, Table 37-30.70, and Footnote 8 [Residential High Density (R-H) Zoning District] as follows (changes in striketh rough/underline 784
Page | 5

format):

Table 37-30.70

Residential High Density (R-H) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use R-H-2.1 R-H-1.8 Additional Use
Regulations
Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other P P (8)

(8) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-390, Table 37-30.170, delete Footnote 12 applicability to Accessory Dwelling Units and add Footnote 15 [Public/Semipublic (PS) Zoning District] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.170

Public/Semipublic (PS) Use Classifications

Land Use PS Additional Use Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling Units, Other CUP P (12)(13)(15)

(15) Accessory dwelling units shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would modify Zoning Code Section 37-30-430, Table 37-30.190, and Footnote 6 [New Urbanism (NU) Zoning Districts] as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

Table 37-30.190

New Urbanism (NU) Districts Use Classifications

Land Use NE (Low) NG-1
(Medium)
NG-2
(High)
VC Additional
Use
Regulations

Residential Uses
Accessory Dwelling P P P NP (6)
785
Page | 6

Units, Other

(6) See Section 37-50.250, Accessory dwelling units,. An accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on a lot with a single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted pursuant to State ADU Law.

The Amendment would also rescind Section 37-50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Chapter 37 of the Salinas Municipal Code (Zoning Code) as follows (changes in strikethrough/underline format):

“Sec. 37-50.250. - Accessory dwelling units.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to comply with the requirements of the California Government Code relating to accessory dwelling units. In the event of any conflict between this section and the California Government Code, the California Government Code shall prevail. An accessory dwelling unit conforming to the provisions of this section shall be approved ministerially within the time limits specified by Government Code Section 65852.2 or any successor provisions. (b) Where Permitted.
(1) Accessory dwelling units, interior are allowed as a permitted use in the R - L district.
(2) Accessory dwelling units, other are allowed as a permitted use in an A, R, or NU district, subject to subsection (d) below. All accessory dwelling units are permitted only on lots with one single -family detached dwelling unit and no other dwelling units.
(3) No accessory dwelling units shall be permitted in a development subject to a planned unit development permit approved under Article IV, Division 13 of Chapter 37, or any applicable predecessor or successor sections of this Code, unless accessory dwelling units are expressly authorized by such planned unit development permit.
(4) A maximum of one accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted per lot or parcel. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold separately from the principal dwelling unit.
(c) Development Regulations and Design Standards —Accessory dwelling unit, interior.
(1) The accessory dwelling unit must have e xterior access independent from the existing single-family detached dwelling unit.
(2) Side and rear setbacks must be determined to be sufficient for fire safety by the building official.
(3) No new or separate utility connection directly between the acces sory dwelling unit and the utility may be required.
(4) Sprinklers may not be required for the accessory dwelling unit unless they are required for the existing single-family detached dwelling unit. 786
Page | 7

(5) The total floor area of an accessory dwelling unit, interior, shall not exceed the greater of one-thousand two-hundred square feet or fifty percent of the existing living area of the primary residence.
(d) Development Regulations and Design Standards - Accessory dwelling unit, other.
(1) Floor Area.
(A) The total floor area of a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed a maximum of one -thousand two -hundred square feet of gross floor area.
(B) The total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed a maximum of fifty-percent of the existing living area of the primary residence, not to exceed a maximum of one -thousand two- hundred square feet.
(C) Accessory dwelling units that require additional floor area for the unit are prohibited on the second floor of a single -family detached dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units may be located within an existing second floor of a single -family detached dwelling unit subject to the requirements of subsection (c) of this section. (2) Design. The exterior design of the accessory dwelling unit sha ll be in harmony with the principal dwelling unit. This shall be accomplished through the use of building materials, architectural design, height, scale, exterior colors, and finishes that are compatible with the principal dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units shall be designed so as not to adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The design standards of the base zoning district shall apply. No passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit. (3) Sprinklers. Sprinklers may not be required for the accessory dwelling unit unless they are required for the existing single -family detached dwelling unit.
(e) Other Development Standards. Except as modified by this section, the accessory dwelling unit shall conform to all applicable development regulations established for single -family detached dwelling units in the underlying zoning district, including without limitation, the maximum height, required yards, minimum usable open space requirements for single-family detached dwelling units in the applicable zoning district, and distance between structures.
(f) Parking. One off-street parking space shall be provided for each bedroom in the accessory dwelling unit, and parking required for the single -family dwelling units shall be provided on the same site in accordance with Section 37-50.360, off-street parking and loading spaces regulations. A minimum of one off-street parking space shall be provided for an efficiency unit off -street parking for accessory dwelling units may be provided as tandem parking on an existing legal driveway or in setbacks, excluding the front or side -corner setbacks of a site; however off -street parking spaces for accessory dwelling units are not required in any of the following instances:
787
Page | 8

(1) The accessory dwelling unit is located within one -half mile of a public transit stop.
(2) The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
(3) The accessory dwelling unit is an "accessory dwelling unit, interior" as defined in this Chapter 37.
(4) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
(5) When there is a car share vehicle pickup location located within o ne block of the accessory dwelling unit.

Notwithstanding the above, if the accessory dwelling unit replaces an existing garage, carport, or covered parking structure, replacement spaces must be provided to meet the requirements of Division 2 of this Chapter 37 . Such replacement spaces may be provided as garaged spaces, covered spaces, uncovered spaces on a legal driveway, tandem spaces, or mechanical parking lifts on the same lot as the primary residence. As used in this subsection (f), "driveway" shall mean a private roadway or travel way and its access point from a public street for the exclusive use of the occupants of a property and their guests.
(g) Density. An accessory dwelling unit which conforms to the requirements of this section shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located, and shall be deemed to be a residential use, consistent with the Salinas general plan and zoning designation for the lot. (h) Deed Restriction. The owner of the parcel of land upon which the accessory dwelling unit is proposed to be located shall execute a deed restriction, running with the land, in a form satisfactory to and approved by the city, which states that the second dwelling unit shall not be rented for terms less than thirty days, that the lot shall be developed and maintained in conformance with this section, and that the requirements of this section are binding upon any successor in ownership of the property. Such deed restriction shall be filed by the city planner for recordation by the Monterey County recorder's office prior to issuance of any building permits for the accessory dwelling unit.
(i) Administrative F ee. The city may charge an administrative fee for monitoring compliance with the provisions of this section as determined by the city council.”

The r escinding of Zoning Code Section 37 -50.250 requires the City to continue to process applications for ADUs and JADUs pursuant to State law as per Government Code Section 66316 until a City Ordinance for the processing of ADUs is approved by the State.

The revision of the “Accessory Dwelling Unit” (ADU) definitions from Zoning Code Section 37-

10.250 are proposed because they are not consistent with the State definitions of “Accessory Dwelling Unit” and “Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit”. The revisions to Zoning Code Sections 37-30.020, 37 -30-060, 37 -30-110, 37 -30.160, 37 -30.390, and 37 -30.430 are also required for Zoning Code consistency with the modified definitions and State ADU Law. 788
Page | 9

CONCLUSION:

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment would modify “Accessory Dwelling Unit” definitions of Section 37 -10.250 (“A” definitions), modify Sections 37-30.020, 37 -30-060, 37 -30-110, 37 -

30.160, 37-30.390, and 37-30.430, rescind Section 37 -50.250 (Accessory Dwelling Units), and apply applicable State standards for the processing of Accessory Dwelling Unit ( ADU) applications. Findings in support of the Amendment are incorporated in the attached Planning Commission Resolution.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The environmental impacts of the project have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is categorically exempt (Class 5) from further environmental analysis per CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations).

TIME CONSIDERATION:

The proposed project is a request for a Zoning Code Amendment, which is a legislative act and not subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (PSA).

ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE TO THE COMMISSION:

The Planning Commission has the following alternatives:

1) Affirm the findings set forth in the attached Resolution, recommending that the City Council find the Amendment exempt from CEQA and introduce and then adopt the Amendment with modifications; or

2) Find that the Amendment is not appropriate and establish findings at the public hearing recommending that the City Council deny the Amendment.

ATTACHMENTS:

Draft Planning Commission Resolution
Draft City Council Ordinance

I:\ComDev\Planning Share Space\Zoning Code Amendments\ZCA 2025-001 - Rescind ADU Ordinance (Sec. 37-50.250)\PC Staff Report - TW edits.docx
789
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#26-022, Version: 1
..Title
Ordinance amending Articles XIV and XIII of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code ..Recommended Action
Adopt an Ordinance amending Article XIV of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code to update regulations prohibiting camping on public property; adopt an Ordinance Amending Article XIII of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code related to the storage of personal property on public property.

City of Salinas Printed on 2/20/2026Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
790

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2026
DEPARTMENT: CITY ADMINISTRATION
FROM: LISA MURPHY, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
TITLE: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES AMENDING ARTICLES XIV AND XIII OF CHAPTER 16 OF THE SALINAS MUNICIPAL CODE, AND

A RESOLUTION UPDATING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

PERTAINING TO UNLAWFUL CAMPING AND STORAGE OF

PERSONAL PROPERTY

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

A motion to take the following actions:

1. Adopt an Ordinance amending Article XIV of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code to update regulations prohibiting camping on public property;

2. Adopt an Ordinance Amending Article XIII of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code related to the storage of personal property on public property; and

3. Approve a Resolution approving updated Administrative Procedures for the Removal of Unlawful Campsites, Bulky Items, and Personal Belongings.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The proposed Ordinance amendments and Resolution establish a coordinated regulatory and administrative framework to address encampments, and storage of personal property on public and certain private property within the City of Salinas. These actions recognize that individuals experiencing homelessness are members of our community who are facing complex and challenging circumstances. At the same time, the City has a responsibility to protect public health and safety, preserve access to public facilities, prevent damage to City infrastruct ure and environmental resources, and ensure that enforcement and removal activities are carried out in a clear, consistent, and legally compliant manner, with dignity and care.

BACKGROUND:

Over the past several years, the City of Salinas has experienced a significant increase in the number and size of encampments located on public property, waterways, parks, sidewalks, rights-of-way, and adjacent to public facilities. While these encampments reflect the very real housing and social 791
Page | 2
service needs within the community, their location and conditions have created challenges that affect both individuals living in encampments and the broader public, including:
 Obstruction of sidewalks, streets, and access to public buildings;  Accumulation of human waste, trash, hazardous materials, and drug paraphernalia;  Environmental degradation of creeks and waterways;
 Increased fire risk and damage to public infrastructure; and  Diminished quality of life for residents, businesses, and visitors.

The City Council previously adopted Ordinances and Resolutions intended to address these issues.

Since that time , legal standards have changed through court cases , operational experience, and ongoing impacts to public health and safety. These changes require updates to both the Municipal Code and the City’s administrative procedures to ensure that our actions are lawful, effective and carried out with compassion.

Ordinance Amending Article XIV of Chapter 16 - Prohibition Against Camping.

The proposed Ordinance amending Article XIV of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code is intended to clarify and strengthen prohibitions against camping on public property and other specified locations. The updates are aligned with the Governor’s recommendations regarding camping restrictions and are intended to balance compassion for individuals experiencing homelessness with the need to protect public spaces. The amendments are intended to:

 Clearly define prohibited camping activities and structures on public property at any time;
 Protect critical infrastructure and sensitive environmental areas;  Reduce public health and safety hazards associated with encampments; and  Ensure public spaces remain available for their intended public use.

Ordinance Amending Article XIII of Chapter 16 – Storage of Personal Property

The proposed Ordinance amending Article XIII of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code updates regulations governing storage of personal property on public property. K ey updates include:

 Reducing the noticing requirement regarding removal of an encampment from 72 hours to 48 hours. This is in alignment with the Governor of California recommendations;  Preventing obstruction of sidewalks, streets and public rights-of-way; and  Addressing public safety and sanitation concerns related to unattended or excessive property storage.

Resolution Updating City Administrative Procedures

The Resolution adopts updated Administrative Procedures to guide how City staff implements the above Ordinances. These procedures are designed to ensure that encampment removals are carried 792
Page | 3
out in a consistent, transparent, and coordinated manner, with an emphasis on outreach and engagement. The procedures provide guidance regarding:

 Outreach efforts and notice requirements;
 Identification and handling of hazardous materials;
 Removal of unlawful encampments;
 Storage, retrieval, and disposal of belongings; and
 Coordination among City departments and service providers.

Adoption of the two Ordinances and approval of the Resolution provide a comprehensive, coordinated approach to addressing encampments and storage of personal property on public property and other locations while balancing compassion for individuals exper iencing homelessness with the City’s obligation to maintain safe, accessible and healthy public spaces for the entire community.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project . The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the e nvironment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

No, Government Code §84308/Levine Act applies does not apply to this item.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Adoption of the Ordinances and approval of the Resolution meet the City Council strategic goal of promoting the health and safety of unsheltered residents, and increased collaboration with partner agencies to address public safety and public health issues.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

This was a collaborative effort between City Administration, City Attorney, Public Works, Community Development, Fire, and Public Works departments.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

793
Page | 4
Implementation of the proposed amendments and the resolution will require ongoing staff time and resources related to outreach, enforcement, cleanup, storage and disposal activities. These costs are anticipated to be absorbed within existing departmental budgets.

Fund

General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name

Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

Ordinance Amendment Article XIV
Ordinance Amendment Article XIII
Resolution Updating Administrative Procedures
794

ORDINANCE NO. ____ (N.C.S.)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 16 OF THE SALINAS

MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE PROHIBITION AGAINST CAMPING

City Attorney Impartial Analysis

This ordinance amends Article XIV of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code by prohibiting camping on public property at any time. This ordinance also makes clear that camping in or along waterways, in or on stormwater facilities, or in surface channels and outfalls is prohibited.

WHEREAS, Salinas is a Charter city organized and operating pursuant to Article 7 of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, through previous legislative enactments (Ordinance No. 2564, Ordinance No. 2567, Ordinance No. 2599 and Resolution Nos. 20884 and 20908), the City Council declared its intent to prevent the misappropriation of City property for personal use and the proliferation of encampments on public property that have a significant adverse effect on public health, safety, and welfare and impede or entirely obstruct access by emergency responders when responding to emergencies; and
WHEREAS, through its previous legislative enactments, the City Council made clear its intent to prevent the misappropriation of City property for personal use and to promote the public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring that City property remains accessible and usable by all members of the public for the purposes for which such public property is intended and by ensuring that City property remains in a clean, sanitary, and accessible condition; and WHEREAS, the public areas within the city, including streets, sidewalks, parks, public buildings, and public land, should be readily accessible, free from obstruction, and available to the public at large for use in a safe and healthy manner; and
WHEREAS, the use of these areas for overnight camping purposes interferes with the ability of residents and the public at large to use the areas in the healthy and safe manner for the uses intended; and
WHEREAS, such camping activity can c onstitute a public health and safety hazard, which adversely impacts other members of the public, neighborhoods, industrial, agricultural, and commercial areas; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the proliferation of camping and encampments on public property in the city of Salinas which has obstructed access by pedestrians and users of City facilities, individuals camping on public property and/or residing in encampments on public property frequently urinate and defecate on City property (and nearby private prope rty) and have been observed using and distributing narcotics and alcohol causing unsafe and unsanitary conditions to persist around and within the areas of the camps and/or the encampments creating an environment for the spread of disease and bacteria and an environment which prevents Salinas’s residents from using and accessing City facilities, including the City libraries and recreation centers; and
795

WHEREAS, City employees and members of the public at large have reported that overnight camping on City pro perty has specifically interfered with their use of public buildings, public sidewalks, public streets, parking lots, parking garages, and other open spaces, including the public space surrounding the library and the public space in front of City Hall; and WHEREAS, City employees leaving City Hall have been confronted by overnight campers screaming, yelling, and displaying other aggressive and erratic behavior that has made those employees fear for their safety upon egress of the building; and WHEREAS, Ci ty employees have been confronted by overnight campers subjecting them to unwanted sexual comments; and
WHEREAS, City employees have observed individuals around the City Permit Center and the adjacent parking structure engage in sexual activity, as well as illegal drug use; and WHEREAS, members of the public as well as City employees have complained about the smell of public places, including the area in front of City Hall and the areas around the City libraries (particularly the John Steinbeck Library) and City Permit Center and adjacent parking structure, as a result of individuals loitering in and around those areas and as a result of overnight camping activity, including urination and defecation by overnight campers; and WHEREAS, drug paraphernalia has been found at the site of the overnight camp in front of City Hall; and
WHEREAS, it has been reported that public spaces can no longer be used by residents and the public at large for the manner and uses in which they were intended, including specific complaints that outdoor public spaces, including, but not limited to, the space in front of City Hall, the space around the City Permit Center and adjacent parking structure, and the space around the John Steinbeck Library, including the grass areas in front o f the John Steinbeck Library, that were once used by residents and the public at large to recreate, eat lunch, and take breaks can no longer be used for those purposes as a result of the litter, urine and feces left by individuals loitering in and around those areas and as a result of the overnight campers in those areas; and
WHEREAS, the lawn areas and other spaces on or around City property, including most-notably the lawn areas in front of City Hall and in front of the John Steinbeck Library are frequently used by persons in such a manner that they have been damaged and or destroyed and in some cases present a danger to the health and safety of the community and of the patrons of those facilities; and
WHEREAS, City employees must regularly clean up and remove human waste from areas used for overnight camping including, but not limited to, the space in front of City Hall, the space surrounding the John Steinbeck Library, recreation centers, public parking lots, and public parking garages; and
WHEREAS, residents and the public at large are prevented from the use of the public areas within and around the city, including streets, sidewalks, parks, public building and public land when those areas are obstructed by a gathering preventing the free passage by use of any street, sidewalk, alley, public way, ingress to any public building, or place used by members of the public to go from place to place; and
796

WHEREAS, the abuse or mutilation of trees, plants, and lawn prevents residents and the public at large from the reasonable use and enjoyment of those items while costing the City substantial money and resources for the restoration of those items; and WHEREAS, urination and defecation outside of urinals, toilets, or commodes located in bathrooms, restrooms, or other structures specifically designated for the purpose of urination and defecation poses a significant health and safety problem to residents and the p ublic at large as well as costing the city substantial money and resources to clean; and WHEREAS, from 2020-2023, an encampment within the Carr Lake area grew to over one hundred separate encampments causing the degradation of waterways through trash accu mulation. The adjacent neighborhoods s aw an increase in criminal activity during this same time period including, but not limited to, acts of indecent exposure and gang-related crimes (homicides, drug dealing, human trafficking, and gambling). In November 2023, the City removed approximately two hundred tons of debris from this area. A wooden walkway (commonly known as the “boardwalk”) that runs along East Laurel Drive on Carr Lake’s south end suffered structural damage by unsheltered individuals removing t he wooden planks and digging underneath the boardwalk to establis h encampments, thereby undermini ng the structural integrity of this pedestrian walkway; and
WHEREAS, encampments along the Alisal Creek have caused degradation of water quality due to human feces and trash entering the waterway; and
WHEREAS, between 2020-2023, the waterway near Casentini Street and Main Street 2020 -2023, became polluted as a result of trash and human waste being deposited into the water way. The City cleaned out approximately ten tons of debris from this waterway. During this same time period, multiple fires occurred that were caused by individuals living in encampments along this waterway endangering nearby residential structures. Accumulated flammable debris have heightened fire risks within this area; and
WHEREAS, during the period 2020 -2025, the number of unsheltered individuals living in encampments in the Circle Drive and Cesar Chavez Park areas has significantly increased and impacted adjacent residential neighborhoods. Criminal activity including drug trafficking and residential theft has increased as a result, in addition to incidents of indecent exposure and evidence of drug use; and
WHEREAS, numerous shopping carts and camping paraphernalia routinely block the dead end of East San Luis Street as a result of the growing unsheltered population establishing encampments in this area; and
WHEREAS, the number of encampments in the CreekBridge area, from Veterans Parkway at East Laurel Drive to the rear of the Safeway grocery store on Constitution Boulevard has grown substantially. Public defecation and disposal of trash by the unsheltered living in these encampments into the waterway have caused degradation of water quality. Drug sales, drug use, and human trafficking are common within this encampment area. Residential theft and robberies have risen as a result of the growing encampment area; and 797

WHEREAS, the roadway underpass at Mark et Street is a focal point for unsheltered encampments leading to significant public health, safety, and quality of life concerns for nearby residents and commuters. The underpass’ location along a major roadway creates an intensified risk for residents of the encampment and for drivers as individuals from the encampment frequently walk into the roadway into traffic, endangering themselves and drivers. Fires started within the encampment cause damage to the roadway underpass threatening the structural integrity of the roadway. The proximity of this encampment to residential neighborhoods has lead to increased theft and vandalism, coupled with an increased insecurity among residents of the neighborhood. The visual blight of encampments adjacent to and within the residential neighborhood diminishes the quality of life for residents of the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, during the period 2020 -2023, the number of encampments within the Chinatown area has increased significantly resulting in an equally significant deterioration of the neighborhood due to increased crime; increased threats to public health from the presence of human waste, trash, rodents and vermin, drugs, and toxic waste. Police operations within this area during this time period and to the present have uncovered extensive drug use and possession (including methamphetamine and fentanyl), possession of dange rous w eapons (including knives, guns, and a hand grenade), and signs of gang control (where gangs exploit the unsheltered population by imposing “taxes” and coercing unsheltered into drug trafficking and other criminal activities). Local business are impac ted by the presence of encampments by the blockage of sidewalks and entryways, which deter customers and visitors; and WHEREAS, the waterway on the Rico Street and West Lake Street area has been plagued by encampments leading to significant enviro nmental issues. The waterway, vital for local agricultural and natural systems, has suffered contamination due to widespread drug use and the presence of human waste; and
WHEREAS, activities within Sherwood Park have been negatively affected by the presence of encampments, rendering it unsafe for use by the community. Widespread defecation and urination have created unhealthy conditions within the area set up with tables and benches for park users. Drug paraphernalia is present throughout the park posing a threat t o the health, safety, and welfare of park users; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that it is necessary to maintain public and private lands, streets, sidewalks, alleys, ways, creeks, waterways, parks, playgrounds, recreation areas, plazas, open spaces, lots, parcels and other public and private areas within the city, in a clean, sanitary and accessible condition and to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community, while recognizing that, subject to reasonable conditions, c amping and camping facilities associated with special events can be beneficial to the cultural and educational well - being of the city; and
WHEREAS, private property owners have complained to the City about the scope, size, and number of encampments on thei r property and the negative health and safety consequences 798

associated with those encampments and have regularly requested the City’s assistance in cleaning up those encampments; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and urgent for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of the residents of the city and the public at large to enact an emergency measure to address the negative health and safety consequences associated with overnight encampments, including, but not limited to the health and s afety consequences created by the accumulation of human waste, the accumulation of garbage, including used needles used for the administration of drugs intravenously, and the safety of city employees from aggressive behavior and unwanted sexual comments; and
WHEREAS, updates to the Salinas Municipal Code are necessary in order to address issues associated with individuals loitering in and around public spaces and also associated with overnight camping within the city and the establishment of encampments on public property and private property; and
WHEREAS, the potential destruction of, damage to, or interference with, infrastructure that is critical to the provision of public services such as law enforcement, fire prevention, transportation, and utilities, including water and waste disposal is a principal threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. Destruction of, damage to, or interference with, critical infrastructure is caused by fire, contamination, restricting access, or other causes. Destruction of, damage to, or interference with, critical infrastructure is often caused by persons whose activities are not permitted or authorized in, on, or near critical infrastructure;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF SALINAS as follows:

SECTION 1. Article XIV of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:

Article XIV. Prohibition Against Camping

Sec. 16-140.010. Purpose.

The public areas within the city, including streets, sidewalks, parks, public building and public land, should be readily accessible and available to residents and the public at large for use in a clean, safe, and healthy manner. The use of these areas by campers interferes with the ability of residents and the public at large to use the areas in the clean, healthy, and safe manner for the uses intended. Such camping and the attendant negative effects can constitute a public health and safety hazard, which adversely impacts other members of the public and neighborhoods, as well as industrial, agricultural, and commercial areas. Nonetheless, sleeping and resting are universal and unavoidable consequences of being human. For individuals with no access to priva te spaces, sleeping and resting can only be done in public. A purpose of this article is to strike a balance between the need of residents and the public at large to clean, reasonable, safe access to public spaces and the needs of individuals without access to private spaces to sleep and rest. It is necessary to maintain public and private lands, streets, sidewalks, alleys, ways, creeks, waterways, parks, playgrounds, recreation areas, plazas, open spaces, lots, parcels and other public and private areas within the city, in a clean, sanitary and accessible condition. It is necessary to protect the health, 799

safety and welfare of the community. It is necessary for all humans to sleep and rest, and for those individuals without access to private spaces, to do so in public spaces. Nothing in this article is intended to interfere with otherwise lawful and ordinary uses of public or private property.

Sec. 16-140.020. Definitions.

For the purposes of this article, the following terms shall have the following definitions:

(a) "Camp" means to place, pitch or occupy camp facilities; to live temporarily in a camp facility or outdoors; to use camp paraphernalia.
(b) "Camp facilities" include, but are not limited to, tents, sleeping bags, blankets, huts, yurts, vehicles, vehicle camping outfits, temporary shelters, or other materials (whether hand-built or otherwise) for the purpose of sleeping, lying, or sheltering one or more persons . (c) "Camp paraphernalia" includes, but is not limited to, bedrolls, air mattresses, tarpaulins, cots, beds, sleeping bags, hammocks and similar equipment.
(d) "City facilities" are city hall, public libraries, the public service yard, police stations, public safety facilities, fire stations, airports, sports complexes, recreation center, the armory building, permit center, pump station, golf course, stormwater facility, sewage treatment plant, and parking garages owned or operated by the city of Salinas. (e) "Community development director" is the community development director or designee. (f) “Critical Infrastructure” means real property or a facility, whether privately or publicly owned, as approved by resolution of the City Council, that the City Manag er designates as being so vital and integral to the operation or functioning of the city that its damage, incapacity, disruption, or destruction would have a debilitating impact on the public health, safety, or welfare. Critical infrastructure may include, but is not limited to, government buildings, such as fire stations, police stations, libraries; structures such as antennas, bridges, roads, sidewalks, train tracks, drainage systems, surface channels, outfalls, or stormwater facilities; or systems, such as computer networks, public utilities, electrical wires, natural gas pipes, telecommunications facilities, or water sources.
(g) "Education facilities" are public or private schools, libraries, sports complexes, and recreation centers at which children regularly gather.
(h) "Establish" means to set up or move equipment, supplies or materials on to public or private property to camp or operate camp facilities.
(i) "Maintain" means to keep or permit equipment, supplies or materials to remain on public or private property in order to camp or operate camp facilities. (j) "Operate" means to participate or assist in establishing or maintaining a camp or camp facility. (k) "Private property" means all private property including, but not limited to, streets, si dewalk, alleys, and improved or unimproved land.
(l) "Public property" means any real or personal property owned or controlled by the city and includes, but is not limited to, any publicly-owned park, building, street, sidewalk, way, path, alley, park, parking lot or other public property owned or controlled by the city and located within the city of Salinas. Public property includes City facilities as defined in this section. (m) “Stormwater facility” means any constructed component of a stormwater system , whether public or private , designed or constructed to perform a particular function or multiple functions. Stormwater facilities include, but are not limited to, pipes, swales, ditches, culverts, 800

street gutters, detention basins, constructed wetlands, in filtration devices, catch basins, oil/water separators, and sediment basins.
(n) “Street” means streets, avenues, highways, lanes, alleys, ways, crossings or intersections, co- routes and cul-de-sacs.

Sec. 16-140.030. Unlawful camping.

Except as may otherwise be specifically permitted in the Salinas Municipal Code, it is unlawful and a public nuisance for any person to camp, establish, maintain, operate or occupy camping facilities, or use camp paraphernalia:

(a) On any public property;
(b) On any critical infrastructure ; within 25 -feet of critical infrastructure ; within 25 -feet of a vehicular or pedestrian entrance or exit of critical infrastructure; on those portions of a right- of-way that are required by state, local, or federal law to be free of obstruction to first responders, including but not limited to memb ers of law -enforcement, fire -prevention, or emergency medical services agencies; or within a wildfire risk area (as defined in California Code of Regulations, title 24, part 9, section 202).
(c) Any private property, improved or unimproved.
(d) The prohibition set forth in this section does not apply to:
(1) Overnight camping on private residential property, by no more than six people, with the consent of the property owner or a person in lawful possession of the property, provided the property owner or a person in lawful possession provides onsite access to flush toilets and onsite refuse disposal, and the camping does not pose a threat to the public’s health, safety, welfare, or otherwise create a public or private nuisance; (2) Mobile home parks and special occupancy parks;
(3) Camping on public or private property pursuant to a permit issued under Salinas Municipal Code Section 16-140.040; and
(4) Day use for lawful activities on public property where authorized. (e) Within 200 feet of any posted notice to vacate or to remove personal property posted pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 16-130.040 or other official signage designating a location for enforcement action or otherwise prohibiting sleeping, sitting, lying, camping, or placing personal property in that location.

A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. In addition to the remedies set forth in Penal Code section 370, the city may institute civil actions to abate a public nuisance pursuant to Sectio n 1-

8.1. Sec. 16-140.040. Overnight event permit.

The city manager may promulgate regulations to establish a program pursuant to which a permit may be issued to establish, maintain and operate a camp or a camp facility in connection with a special overnight event. A special overnight event is intended to include, but is not limited to, programs operated by departments of the city, events organized by nonprofit or community-based organizations, organized youth or school events, and sporting e vents. The regulations shall be published on the city’s website. Regulations promulgated by the city manager shall have the same force and effect of law and become effective upon date of publication. 801

Any person who establishes, maintains or operates a camp or camp facility without a permit may be subject to a misdemeanor. Such activity constitutes a public nuisance. In addition to the remedies set forth in Penal Code section 370, the city may institute civil actions to abate a public nuisance pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 1-8.1.

Sec. 16-140.050. Posting of overnight event permit.

It is unlawful for any person to establish, maintain, conduct or carry on any camp or camp facility unless there shall be at all times posted in a conspicuous place upon the area or tract of land upon which the camp or camp facility is located a permit obtained from the city in accordance with the provisions of Section 16-140.040 of this chapter.

A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. In addition to the remedies set forth in Penal Code section 370, the city may institute civil actions to abate a pu blic nuisance pursuant to Section 1 -

8.1. Sec. 16-140.060. Conduct on public property, monuments, and lawns.

No person, after having been notified by a police officer or other city employee or official that he or she is in violation of the prohibition in this section shall:

(a) Walk, stand, sit, or lie upon any monument, vase, decorative fountain, drinking fountain, bike rack, trash receptacle, median, fire hydrant, street -tree planter, berm, utility cabinet, railing, fence, planter, stairwell, parking lot, or parking structure; (b) Walk, stand, sit, or lie upon any public lawn or planted area that is posted wi th signs that forbid such conduct;

A violation of this section is a misdemeanor.

Sec. 16-140.070. Conduct on private property.

The city council finds and determines that encampments located on private property have at least the same health, safety, and welfare concerns as encampments on public property and find the same to constitute a nuisance. The city manager is authorized to promulgate all regulations necessary to provide for city clean -up and removal of encampments located on private pro perty and for the recovery of all costs and expenses associated therewith. The regulations shall be published on the city’s website. Regulations promulgated by the city manager shall have the same force and effect of law and become effective upon date of publication.

Sec. 16-140.080. Noticed cleanup of public property.

It is necessary to periodically close public property for cleaning and removal of accumulated garbage, refuse, hypodermic needles, and debris. The city council shall approve, by resolution, a 802

form and procedure the promulgation of public notice for the closing of public property for such cleanings. On no one day shall the city close for cleaning more than one fourth of the sidewalks in the city for cleaning.

SECTION 2. All ordinances and parts of ordinances and all resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed as of the effective date of this ordinance.

SECTION 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause a summary of this ordinance to be published once in a newspaper published and circulated in Salinas within fifteen (15) days after adoption. (Salinas Charter Section 11.9)

SECTION 4. CEQA Compliance. The City Council’s adoption of this ordinance is not a project subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it would not have a significant effect on the environment.

Additionally, the City Council’s adoption of this ordinance is exempt because it does not meet the definition of a “project” under CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(1) and 15378(a), because it has no potential to result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable physical change in the environment.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

The Salinas City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each and every section, subsection, clause, and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________________, 202 6, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

_________________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
803

___________________________________
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney

ATTEST:

___________________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk

804

ORDINANCE NO. _____ (N.C.S.)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIII OF CHAPTER 16 OF THE SALINAS

MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE STORAGE OF PERSONAL BELONGINGS

ON CITY PROPERTY

City Attorney Impartial Analysis

This ordinance amends Article XIII of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Municipal Code by prohibiting the storage of any personal property on City property and by redefining what personal property will be collected and stored as a part of the City’s enforcement of the Ordinance by cleaning-up an encampment. This ordinance also reduces the pre-cleanup noticing requirement to twenty- four hours and reduces the length of time personal belongings collected at a cleanup will be stored to sixty (60) days. This ordinance also allows for removal of personal property without prior notice in exigent circumstances involving an imminent threat to life, safety, health, or infrastructure.

WHEREAS, Salinas is a Charter city organized and operating pursuant to Article 7 of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, through previous legislative enactments (Ordinance No. 2564, Ordinance No. 2567, Ordinance No. 2599, and Resolution Nos. 20884 and 20908), the City Council declared its intent to prevent the misappropriation of City pr operty for personal use and the proliferation of encampments on public property that have a significant adverse effect on public health, safety, and welfare and impede or entirely obstruct access by emergency responders when responding to emergencies; and
WHEREAS, through its previous legislative enactments, the City Council made clear its intent to prevent the misappropriation of City property for personal use and to promote the public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring that City property remains accessible and usable by all members of the public for the purposes for which such public property is intended and by ensuring that City property remains in a clean, sanitary, and accessible condition; and WHEREAS, the public areas within the city, including streets, sidewalks, parks, public buildings, and public land, should be readily accessible, free from obstruction, and available to the public at large for use in a safe and healthy manner; and
WHEREAS, the use of these areas for overnight camping purposes interferes with the ability of residents and the public at large to use the areas in the healthy and safe manner for the uses intended; and
WHEREAS, such camping activity can constitute a public health and safety hazard, which adversely impacts other memb ers of the public, neighborhoods, industrial, agricultural, and commercial areas; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the proliferation of camping and encampments on public property in the city of Salinas which has obstructed access by pedestrians and users of Cit y facilities, individuals camping on public property and/or residing in encampments on public property frequently urinate and defecate on City property (and nearby private property) and have been observed using and distributing narcotics and alcohol causing unsafe and unsanitary conditions 805

to persist around and within the areas of the camps and/or the encampments creating an environment for the spread of disease and bacteria and an environment which prevents Salinas’s residents from using and accessing City facilities, including the City libraries and recreation centers; and
WHEREAS, City employees and members of the public at large have reported that overnight camping on City property has specifically interfered with their use of public buildings, public sidewalks, public streets, parking lots, parking garages, and other open spaces, including the public space surrounding the library and the public space in front of City Hall; and WHEREAS, City employees leaving City Hall have been confronted by overnight campers screaming, yelling, and displaying other aggressive and erratic behavior that has made those employees fear for their safety upon egress of the building; and WHEREAS, City employees have been confronted by overnight campers subjecting them to unwanted sexual comments; and
WHEREAS, City employees have observed individuals around the City Permit Center and the adjacent parking structure engage in sexual activity, as well as illegal drug use; and WHEREAS, members of the public as well as City employees have complained about the smell of public places, including the area in front of City Hall and the areas around the City libraries (particularly the John Steinbeck Library) and City Permit Center and adjacent parking structure, as a result of individuals loitering in and around those areas and as a result of overnight camping activity, including urination and defecation by overnight campers; and WHEREAS, drug paraphernalia has been found at the site of the overnight camp in front of City Hall; and
WHEREAS, it has been reported that public spaces can no longer be used by residents and the public at large for the manner and uses in which they were intended, including specific complaints that outdoor public spaces, including, but not limited to, the space in front of City Hall, the space around the City Permit Center and adjacent parking structure, and the space around the John Steinbeck Library, including the grass areas in front of the John Steinbeck Library, that were once used by residents and the public a t large to recreate, eat lunch, and take breaks can no longer be used for those purposes as a result of the litter, urine and feces left by individuals loitering in and around those areas and as a result of the overnight campers in those areas; and
WHEREAS, the lawn areas and other spaces on or around City property, including most-notably the lawn areas in front of City Hall and in front of the John Steinbeck Library are frequently used by persons in such a manner that they have been damaged and or d estroyed and in some cases present a danger to the health and safety of the community and of the patrons of those facilities; and
WHEREAS, City employees must regularly clean up and remove human waste from areas used for overnight camping including, but no t limited to, the space in front of City Hall, the space surrounding the John Steinbeck Library, recreation centers, public parking lots, and public parking garages; and
WHEREAS, residents and the public at large are prevented from the use of the public areas within and around the city, including streets, sidewalks, parks, public building and public land when those areas are obstructed by a gathering preventing the free passage by use of any street, 806

sidewalk, alley, public way, ingress to any public buildi ng, or place used by members of the public to go from place to place; and
WHEREAS, the abuse or mutilation of trees, plants, and lawn prevents residents and the public at large from the reasonable use and enjoyment of those items while costing the City substantial money and resources for the restoration of those items; and WHEREAS, urination and defecation outside of urinals, toilets, or commodes located in bathrooms, restrooms, or other structures specifically designated for the purpose of urination and defecation poses a significant health and safety problem to residents and the public at large as well as costing the city substantial money and resources to clean; and WHEREAS, from 2020-2023, an encampment within the Carr Lake area grew to over one hundred separate encampments causing the degradation of waterways through trash accumulation. The adjacent neighborhoods saw an increase in criminal activity during this same time period including, but not limited to, acts of indecent exposure and gang-related crimes (homicides, drug dealing, human trafficking, and gambling). In November 2023, the City removed approximately two hundred tons of debris from this area. A wooden walkway (commonly known as the “boardwalk”) that runs along East Laurel Drive on Carr Lake’s south end suffered structural damage by unsheltered individuals removing the wooden planks and digging underneath the boardwalk to establish encampments, thereby undermining the structural integrity of this pedestrian walkway; and
WHEREAS, encampments along the Alisal Creek have caused degradation of water quality due to human feces and trash entering the waterway; and
WHEREAS, between 2020-2023, the waterway near Casentini Street and Main Street 2020 -2023, became polluted as a result of trash and human waste being deposited into the waterway. The City cleaned out approximately ten tons of debris from this waterway. During this same time period, multiple fires occurred that were caused by individuals living in encampments along this waterway endangering nearby residential structures. Accumulated flammable debris have heightened fire risks within this area; and
WHEREAS, during the period 2020 -2025, the number of unsheltered individuals living in encampments in the Circle Drive and Cesar Chavez Park areas has significantly increased and impacted adjacent residential neighborhoods. Criminal activity including drug trafficking and residential theft has increased as a result, in addition to incidents of indecent exposure and evidence of drug use; and
WHEREAS, numerous shopping carts and camping paraphernalia routinely block the dead end of East San Luis Street as a result of the growing unsheltered population establishing encampments in this area; and
WHEREAS, the number of encampments in the CreekBridge area, from Veterans Parkway at East Laurel Drive to the rear of the Safeway grocery store on Constitution Boulevard has grown substantially. Public defecation and disposal of trash by the unsheltered living in these encampments into the waterway have caused degradation of water quality. Drug sales, drug use, 807

and human trafficking are common within this encampment area. Residential theft and robberies have risen as a result of the growing encampment area; and WHEREAS, the roadway underpass at Market Street is a focal point for unsheltered encampments leading to significant public health, safety, and quality of life concerns for nearby residents and commuters. The underpass’ location along a major roadway creates an intensified risk for residents of the encampment and for drivers as individuals from the encampment frequently walk into the roadway into traffic, endangering themselves and drivers. Fires started within the encampment cause damage to the roadway underpass threatening the structural integrity of the roadway. The proximity of this encampment to residential neighborhoods has lead to increased theft and vandalism, coupled with an increased insecurity among residents of the neighborhood. The visual blight of encampments adjace nt to and within the residential neighborhood diminishes the quality of life for residents of the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, during the period 2020 -2023, the number of encampments within the Chinatown area has increased significantly resulting in an equall y significant deterioration of the neighborhood due to increased crime; increased threats to public health from the presence of human waste, trash, rodents and vermin, drugs, and toxic waste. Police operations within this area during this time period and t o the present have uncovered extensive drug use and possession (including methamphetamine and fentanyl), possession of dangerous weapons (including knives, guns, and a hand grenade), and signs of gang control (where gangs exploit the unsheltered population by imposing “taxes” and coercing unsheltered into drug trafficking and other criminal activities). Local business are impacted by the presence of encampments by the blockage of sidewalks and entryways, which deter customers and visitors; and WHEREAS, the waterway on the Rico Street and West Lake Street area has been plagued by encampments leading to significant environmental issues. The waterway, vital for local agricultural and natural systems, has suffered contamination due to widespread drug use and the presence of human waste; and
WHEREAS, activities within Sherwood Park have been negatively affected by the presence of encampments, rendering it unsafe for use by the community. Widespread defecation and urination have created unhealthy conditions within the area set up with tables and benches for park users. Drug paraphernalia is present throughout the park posing a threat to the health, safety, and welfare of park users; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that it is necessary to maintain public and private lands, streets, sidewalks, alleys, ways, creeks, waterways, parks, playgrounds, recreation areas, plazas, open spaces, lots, parcels and other public and private areas within the city, in a clean, sanitary and accessible condition and to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community, while recognizing that, subject to reasonable conditions, camping and camping facilities associated with special events can be beneficial to the cultural and educational well - being of the city; and
808

WHEREAS, private property owners have complained to the City about the scope, size, and number of encampments on their property and the negative health and safety consequences associated with those encampments and have regularly requested the City’s assist ance in cleaning up those encampments; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and urgent for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of the residents of the city and the public at large to enact an emergency measure to address the negative health and safety consequences associated with overnight encampments, including, but not limited to the health and safety consequences created by the accumulation of human waste, the accumulation of garbage, including used needles used for the administrat ion of drugs intravenously, and the safety of city employees from aggressive behavior and unwanted sexual comments; and
WHEREAS, updates to the Salinas Municipal Code are necessary in order to address issues associated with individuals loitering in and aro und public spaces and also associated with overnight camping within the city and the establishment of encampments on public property and private property; and
WHEREAS, the potential destruction of, damage to, or interference with, infrastructure that is critical to the provision of public services such as law enforcement, fire prevention, transportation, and utilities, including water and waste disposal is a principal threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. Destruction of, damage to, or interference with, critical infrastructure is caused by fire, contamination, restricting access, or other causes. Destruction of, damage to, or interference with, critical infra structure is often caused by persons whose activities are not permitted or authorized in, on, or near critical infrastructure; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF SALINAS as follows:

SECTION 1. Article XIII of Chapter 16 of the Salinas Munici pal Code is hereby amended as follows:

Article XIII. Storage of Personal Property on City Property

Sec. 16-130.010. Purpose.

The public areas within the city, including streets, sidewalks, parks, public building s, and public land, should be readily accessible and available to residents and the public at large for use in a safe and healthy manner. The use of these areas for the storage of personal property interferes with the ability of residents and the public at large to use the areas in the healthy and safe manner for the uses intended. Such storage and the attendant negative effects can constitute a public health and safety hazard, which adversely impacts other members of the public and neighborhoods, as well as industrial, agricultural, and commercial areas. Nonetheless, individuals who have no access to private spaces, nonetheless need to retain access to a limited amount of personal property in public areas. A purpose of this article is to strike a balance between the need of residents and the public at large to reasonable, safe access to public space s and the needs of individuals without access to private spaces to retain access to a limited amount of personal property. It is necessary to maintain public and private lands, streets, sidewalks, alleys, ways, creeks, waterways, parks, playgrounds, recreation areas, plazas, open spaces, lots, parcels and other public infrastructure and public and 809

Created: 2025-02-25 12:32:12 [EST]
(Supp. No. 106, 1/25)