Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MOORE
IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC (MIG)
787
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
Contents
RECITALS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 TERMS ........................................................................................................................................... 4
1. Scope of Service. ................................................................................................................. 4
2. Term; Completion Schedule. ............................................................................................... 4
3. Compensation. ..................................................................................................................... 4
4. Billing. ................................................................................................................................. 4
5. Meet & Confer. .................................................................................................................... 5
6. Additional Copies................................................................................................................. 5
7. Responsibility of Consultant................................................................................................ 5
8. Responsibility of City. ......................................................................................................... 5
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. .................................................................................... 6
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. ................................................................................... 6
11. Insurance.............................................................................................................................. 6
12. Access to Records................................................................................................................ 6
13. Non-Assignability. ............................................................................................................... 7
14. Changes to Scope of Work. ................................................................................................. 7
15. Ownership of Documents. ................................................................................................... 7
16. Termination.......................................................................................................................... 7
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. ................................................................ 8
18. Exhibits Incorporated........................................................................................................... 8
19. Independent Contractor........................................................................................................ 8
20. Integration and Entire Agreement........................................................................................ 8
21. Jurisdiction and Venue......................................................................................................... 9
22. Severability .......................................................................................................................... 9
23. Notices. ................................................................................................................................ 9
24. Nondiscrimination.............................................................................................................. 10
25. Conflict of Interest. ............................................................................................................ 10
26. Headings. ........................................................................................................................... 10
27. Attorneys’ Fees.................................................................................................................. 10
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement................................................................................................. 10
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement......................................................................... 10
30. Licenses.............................................................................................................................. 10
31. Counterparts....................................................................................................................... 10 788
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
32. Legal Representation. ........................................................................................................ 11
33. Joint Representation........................................................................................................... 11
34. Warranty of Authority........................................................................................................ 11
35. No Waiver of Rights. ......................................................................................................... 11
36. Subject to Availability of Funds........................................................................................ 11
37. Levine Act Disclosure Compliance (Cal Government Code Sec. 84308)......................... 11
38. Electronic Execution of Agreement................................................................................... 12 Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements.............................................................................................. 13 Exhibit B- Scope of Service.......................................................................................................... 16 789
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC (MIG) This Agreement for Professional Services (the “Agreement” and/or “Contract”) is made and entered into this 15th day of May 2026 between the City of Salinas, a California Charter city and municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), and Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc (MIG), a California corporation (hereinafter “Consultant”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that he, she, or it is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to render such professional services, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows:
TERMS
1. Scope of Service. It is understood by the City and the Consultant that Consultant performs or secures the performance of consulting and related services for the City on an ongoing basis. On each occasion Consultant performs services for the City, Consultant shall advise the City in writing of the scope of services to be provided, and the cost of, and estimated time to perform the services. Consultant shall not proceed to perform any services until the City and Consultant have established a project cost, a completion schedule, a timeframe for performance, and written authorization by the City to perform services. Written approval for performance and compensation may be granted by the City Engineer or the Public Works Director.
2. Term; Completion Schedule. This Agreement shall commence on 1 July 2026 and will continue for five (5) years through 1 July 2031, unless terminated earlier (the “Initial Term”).
This Agreement may be extended only upon mutual written consent of the parties and may be terminated only pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
3. Compensation. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant for services rendered the City pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis according to the rates of compensation set forth in Exhibit B and shall not exceed Two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) annually. There is no minimum contract amount guarantee, and a total combined/aggregate contract amount shall not exceed $1,000,000. It is understood and agreed there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied, that this dollar amount will be authorized under this Agreement.
4. Billing. Consultant shall submit to City an itemized invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to City, describing its services and costs for the period covered by the invoice.
Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services 790
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
performed by more than one person. Consultant’s bills shall include the following information to which such services cost or pertain:
(A) A brief description of services performed;
(B) The date the services were performed;
(C) The number of hours spent and by whom;
(D) A brief description of any costs incurred; and
(E) The Consultant’s signature.
Any such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement.
City shall make payment on each such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt; provided, however, that if Consultant submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until thirty (30) days after a correct and complying invoice has been submitted by Consultant. The City shall process undisputed portion immediately.
5. Meet & Confer. Consultant agrees to meet and confer with City or its agents or employees with regard to services as set forth herein as may be required by the City to ensure timely and adequate performance of the Agreement.
6. Additional Copies. If City requires additional copies of reports, or any other material which Consultant is required to furnish as part of the services under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional copies as are requested, and City shall compensate Consultant for the actual costs related to the production of such copies by Consultant.
7. Responsibility of Consultant. By executing this Agreement, Consultant agrees that the services to be provided and work to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed in a fully competent manner. By executing this Agreement, Consultant further agrees and represents to City that the Consultant possesses, or shall arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources, and facilities necessary to provide the City the services contemplated under this Agreement and that City relies upon the professional skills of Consultant to do and perform Consultant’s work. Consultant further agrees and represents that Consultant shall follow the current, generally accepted practices in this area to the profession to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding the projects for which the services are rendered under this Agreement.
8. Responsibility of City. To the extent appropriate to the projects to be completed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, City shall:
791
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
(A) Assist Consultant by placing at its disposal all available information pertinent to the projects, including but not limited to, previous reports and any other data relative to the projects. Nothing contained herein shall obligate City to incur any expense in connection with completion of studies or acquisition of information not otherwise in the possession of City. (B) Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents presented by Consultant, and render verbally or in writing as may be appropriate, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of Consultant.
(C) City Manager, or his designee, shall act as City’s representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have the complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to Consultant’s services.
City may unilaterally change its representative upon notice to the Consultant. (D) Give prompt written notice to Consultant whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in a project.
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. Acceptance by the City of the work to be performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of Consultant from professional responsibility for the work performed.
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless.
Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and designated agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including without limitation, reasonable costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s performance of work hereunder, including the performance of work of any of Consultant’s subcontractors or agents, or Consultant’s failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in the agreement, except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.
11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance meeting the requirements specified in Exhibit A hereto.
12. Access to Records. Consultant shall maintain all preparatory books, records, documents, accounting ledgers, and similar materials including but not limited to calculation and survey notes relating to work performed for the City under this Agreement on file for at least three (3) years following the date of final payment to Consultant by City. Any duly authorized representative(s) of City shall have access to such records for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying at reasonable times during Consultant’s usual and customary business hours.
Consultant shall provide proper facilities to City’s representative(s) for such access and inspection.
792
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
13. Non-Assignability. It is recognized by the parties hereto that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. This Agreement is personal to Consultant and shall not be assigned by it without express written approval of the City.
14. Changes to Scope of Work. City may at any time, and upon a minimum of ten (10) days written notice, seek to modify the scope of services to be provided for any project to be completed under this Agreement. Consultant shall, upon receipt of said notice, determine the impact on both time and compensation of such change in scope and notify City in writing. Upon agreement between City and Consultant as to the extent of said impacts to time and compensation, an amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared describing such changes.
Execution of the amendment by City and Consultant shall constitute the Consultant’s notice to proceed with the changed scope.
15. Ownership of Documents. Title to all final documents, including drawings, specifications, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software (if purchased on the City’s behalf), video and audio tapes, software output, and any other materials with respect to work performed under this Agreement shall vest with City at such time as City has compensated Consultant, as provided herein, for the services rendered by Consultant in connection with which they were prepared. City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant against all damages, claims, lawsuits, and losses of any kind including defense costs arising out of any use of said documents, drawings, and/or specifications on any other project without written authorization of the Consultant.
16. Termination.
(A) City shall have the authority to terminate this Agreement, upon ten days written notice to Consultant, as follows:
(1) If in the City’s opinion the conduct of the Consultant is such that the interest of the City may be impaired or prejudiced, or
(2) For any reason whatsoever.
(B) Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of such amount as fairly compensates Consultant for all work satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination based upon the Consultant’s rates shown in Exhibit B and/or Section 3 of this Agreement, except that:
(1) In the event of termination by the City for Consultant’s default, City shall deduct from the amount due Consultant the total amount of additional expenses incurred by City as a result of such default. Such deduction from amounts due Consultant are made to compensate City for its actual additional costs incurred in securing satisfactory performance of the terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to, costs of engaging another consultant(s) for such purposes. In the event that such additional 793
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
expenses shall exceed amounts otherwise due and payable to Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall pay City the full amount of such expense. (C) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, Consultant shall:
(1) Upon receipt of written notice of such termination promptly cease all services on this project, unless otherwise directed by City; and (2) Deliver to City all documents, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software output, video and audio tapes, and any other materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement. Such material is to be delivered to City in completed form; however, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15 herein, City may condition payment for services rendered to the date of termination upon Consultant’s delivery to the City of such material.
(D) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, City is hereby expressly permitted to assume the projects and complete them by any means, including but not limited to, an agreement with another party.
(E) The rights and remedy of the City and Consultant provided under this Section are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or appearing in any other section of this Agreement.
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. Services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance and full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder.
18. Exhibits Incorporated. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement and attached to it are hereby incorporated in it by this reference. In the event there is a conflict between any of the terms of this Agreement and any of the terms of any exhibit to the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall control the respective duties and liabilities of the parties.
19. Independent Contractor. It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that Consultant, while engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Consultant expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee or servant of the City.
20. Integration and Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters contained herein. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except by amendment in writing signed by both parties. 794
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
21. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, County of Monterey, and City of Salinas.
Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in the State of California, in the County of Monterey or in the appropriate federal court with jurisdiction over the matter.
22. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, but the remainder of the Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect.
23. Notices.
(A) Written notices to the City hereunder shall, until further notice by City, be addressed to:
City Manager
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
With a copy to:
City Attorney
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
(B) Written notices to the Consultant shall, until further notice by the Consultant, be addressed to:
Daniel Iacofano, President and CEO
MIG
800 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
510-845-7549
[email protected]
(C) The execution of any such notices by the City Manager shall be effective as to Consultant as if it were by resolution or order of the City Council, and Consultant shall not question the authority of the City to execute any such notice. (D) All such notices shall either be delivered personally to the other party’s designee named above, or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, properly addressed as aforesaid, postage fully prepaid, and shall be effective the day following such deposit in the mail. 795
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
24. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability.
25. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and declares that it presently has no interest, and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any manner or degree which will render the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law. Consultant further declares that, in the performance of this Agreement, no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000 et seq.) and Salinas City Code Chapter 2A that apply to Consultant as the result of Consultant’s performance of the work or services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
26. Headings. The section headings appearing herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of this Agreement.
27. Attorneys’ Fees. In case suit shall be brought to interpret or to enforce this Agreement, or because of the breach of any other covenant or provision herein contained, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to such costs as may be allowed by the Court. City’s attorneys’ fees, if awarded, shall be calculated at the market rate.
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive and both City and Consultant expressly reserves the right to contract with other entities for the same or similar services.
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not intend to create any obligations express or implied other than those set out herein; further, this Agreement shall not create any rights in any party not a signatory hereto.
30. Licenses. If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of Consultant, its representatives, agents or subcontractors by federal, state or local law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and that any applicable bond posted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement. 796
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
32. Legal Representation. Each party affirms that it has been represented, if it so chose, by legal counsel of its own choosing regarding the preparation and the negotiation of this Agreement and the matters and claims set forth herein, and that each of them has read this Agreement and is fully aware of its contents and its legal effect. Neither party is relying on any statement of the other party outside the terms set forth in this Agreement as an inducement to enter into this Agreement.
33. Joint Representation. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. No presumptions or rules of interpretation based upon the identity of the party preparing or drafting the Agreement, or any part thereof, shall be applicable or invoked.
34. Warranty of Authority. Each party represents and warrants that it has the right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement. Each party further represents and warrants that it has given any and all notices, and obtained any and all consents, powers, and authorities, necessary to permit it, and the persons entering into this Agreement for it, to enter into this Agreement.
35. No Waiver of Rights. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. The failure to provide notice of any breach of this Agreement or failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver thereof.
Failure on the part of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or any other provision. A waiver by the City of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be construed as waiver(s) of any other condition of performance under this Agreement.
36. Subject to Availability of Funds. In the event that the City Council, or other governing body, fails to appropriate or budget sufficient funds for the continuation of this agreement, or should funds become unavailable for any other reason, the City reserves the right to terminate this agreement upon written notice. This termination shall be effective as of the last day of the fiscal year for which funds were appropriated. Upon such termination, the Consultant will be limited to compensation for satisfactory services rendered up to the termination date.
37. Levine Act Disclosure Compliance (Cal Government Code Sec. 84308). Consultant hereby affirms and warrants that it has not contributed to the campaign of any elected or appointed City official an amount totaling more than $500 within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this Agreement, except as Consultant has disclosed within its Levine Act Disclosure Form submitted by Consultant to the City. Consultant agrees, that in the event it makes any contributions subject to the Levine Act’s disclosure requirements within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this Agreement, that it will file a Levine Act Disclosure Form (or Forms). Consultant acknowledges this duty of disclosure and that the City has made the Levine Act Disclosure Form(s) readily available on the City’s public internet site under Your Government / Transparency section for Consultant’s continuous compliance. 797
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
38. Electronic Execution of Agreement. The words “execution,” “signed,” “signature,” and words of like import in this Agreement and shall be deemed to include electronic signatures or electronic records (including, without limitation, DocuSign and AdobeSign), each of which shall be of the same legal effect, validity, enforceability, and admissibility as a handwritten signature.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF SALINAS
____________________________
René Mendez, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
□ Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney, or
□ Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney
MIG
___________________________________
By: Daniel Iacofano
Its: President & CEO
798
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements
Insurance Requirements
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. With respect to General Liability and Professional Liability, coverage should be maintained for a minimum of five (5) years after Agreement completion.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(A)Commercial General Liability (“CGL”): Insurance Services Office Form (“ISO”) CG 00 01 covering CGL on an occurrence basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (B) Automobile Liability: ISO Form CA 0001 covering any auto, or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired and non-owned, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(C)Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(D)Professional Liability (also known as Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to the work being performed, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate per policy period of one year.
If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Salinas requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City of Salinas, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85, or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
Primary Coverage
799
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
For any claims related to this Agreement or the project described within this Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.
Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Salinas for all work performed by the Consultant, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared by Consultant to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, Consultant shall provide coverage to reduce or eliminate such self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the consultant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administrations, and defense expenses. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of Agreement work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the Agreement effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of Agreement work.
4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.
Verification of Coverage
800
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable insurance language effecting coverage required by this Agreement. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all sub-consultants and/or subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from such sub-consultants and/or subcontractors.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Maintenance of Insurance
Maintenance of insurance by Consultant as specified shall in no way be interpreted as relieving Consultant of its indemnification obligations or any responsibility whatsoever and the Consultant may carry, at its own expense, such additional insurance as it deems necessary. 801
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
Exhibit B- Scope of Service
802
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
MIG
June 2026
803
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MODERN
TIMES, INC
804
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
Contents
RECITALS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 TERMS ........................................................................................................................................... 4
1. Scope of Service. ................................................................................................................. 4
2. Term; Completion Schedule. ............................................................................................... 4
3. Compensation. ..................................................................................................................... 4
4. Billing. ................................................................................................................................. 4
5. Meet & Confer. .................................................................................................................... 5
6. Additional Copies................................................................................................................. 5
7. Responsibility of Consultant................................................................................................ 5
8. Responsibility of City. ......................................................................................................... 5
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. .................................................................................... 6
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. ................................................................................... 6
11. Insurance.............................................................................................................................. 6
12. Access to Records................................................................................................................ 6
13. Non-Assignability. ............................................................................................................... 7
14. Changes to Scope of Work. ................................................................................................. 7
15. Ownership of Documents. ................................................................................................... 7
16. Termination.......................................................................................................................... 7
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. ................................................................ 8
18. Exhibits Incorporated........................................................................................................... 8
19. Independent Contractor........................................................................................................ 8
20. Integration and Entire Agreement........................................................................................ 8
21. Jurisdiction and Venue......................................................................................................... 9
22. Severability .......................................................................................................................... 9
23. Notices. ................................................................................................................................ 9
24. Nondiscrimination.............................................................................................................. 10
25. Conflict of Interest. ............................................................................................................ 10
26. Headings. ........................................................................................................................... 10
27. Attorneys’ Fees.................................................................................................................. 10
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement................................................................................................. 10
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement......................................................................... 10
30. Licenses.............................................................................................................................. 10
31. Counterparts....................................................................................................................... 10 805
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
32. Legal Representation. ........................................................................................................ 11
33. Joint Representation........................................................................................................... 11
34. Warranty of Authority........................................................................................................ 11
35. No Waiver of Rights. ......................................................................................................... 11
36. Subject to Availability of Funds........................................................................................ 11
37. Levine Act Disclosure Compliance (Cal Government Code Sec. 84308)......................... 11
38. Electronic Execution of Agreement................................................................................... 12 Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements.............................................................................................. 13 Exhibit B- Scope of Service.......................................................................................................... 16 806
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND MODERN TIMES, INC
This Agreement for Professional Services (the “Agreement” and/or “Contract”) is made and entered into this 15th day of May 2026 between the City of Salinas, a California Charter city and municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), and Modern Times, Inc., a California corporation (hereinafter “Consultant”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that he, she, or it is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to render such professional services, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows:
TERMS
1. Scope of Service. It is understood by the City and the Consultant that Consultant performs or secures the performance of consulting and related services for the City on an ongoing basis. On each occasion Consultant performs services for the City, Consultant shall advise the City in writing of the scope of services to be provided, and the cost of, and estimated time to perform the services. Consultant shall not proceed to perform any services until the City and Consultant have established a project cost, a completion schedule, a timeframe for performance, and written authorization by the City to perform services. Written approval for performance and compensation may be granted by the City Engineer or the Public Works Director.
2. Term; Completion Schedule. This Agreement shall commence on 1 July 2026 and shall continue for five (5) years through 1 July 2031, unless terminated earlier (the “Initial Term”).
This Agreement may be extended only upon mutual written consent of the parties and may be terminated only pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
3. Compensation. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant for services rendered the City pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis according to the rates of compensation of set forth in Exhibit B and shall not exceed Two hundred thousand dollars ($200,00) annually. There is no minimum contract amount guarantee, and a total combined/aggregate contract amount shall not exceed $1,000,000. It is understood and agreed there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied, that this dollar amount will be authorized under this Agreement.
4. Billing. Consultant shall submit to City an itemized invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to City, describing its services and costs for the period covered by the invoice.
Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services 807
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
performed by more than one person. Consultant’s bills shall include the following information to which such services cost or pertain:
(A) A brief description of services performed;
(B) The date the services were performed;
(C) The number of hours spent and by whom;
(D) A brief description of any costs incurred; and
(E) The Consultant’s signature.
Any such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement.
City shall make payment on each such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt; provided, however, that if Consultant submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until thirty (30) days after a correct and complying invoice has been submitted by Consultant. The City shall process undisputed portion immediately.
5. Meet & Confer. Consultant agrees to meet and confer with City or its agents or employees with regard to services as set forth herein as may be required by the City to ensure timely and adequate performance of the Agreement.
6. Additional Copies. If City requires additional copies of reports, or any other material which Consultant is required to furnish as part of the services under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional copies as are requested, and City shall compensate Consultant for the actual costs related to the production of such copies by Consultant.
7. Responsibility of Consultant. By executing this Agreement, Consultant agrees that the services to be provided and work to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed in a fully competent manner. By executing this Agreement, Consultant further agrees and represents to City that the Consultant possesses, or shall arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources, and facilities necessary to provide the City the services contemplated under this Agreement and that City relies upon the professional skills of Consultant to do and perform Consultant’s work. Consultant further agrees and represents that Consultant shall follow the current, generally accepted practices in this area to the profession to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding the projects for which the services are rendered under this Agreement.
8. Responsibility of City. To the extent appropriate to the projects to be completed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, City shall:
808
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
(A) Assist Consultant by placing at its disposal all available information pertinent to the projects, including but not limited to, previous reports and any other data relative to the projects. Nothing contained herein shall obligate City to incur any expense in connection with completion of studies or acquisition of information not otherwise in the possession of City. (B) Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents presented by Consultant, and render verbally or in writing as may be appropriate, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of Consultant.
(C) City Manager, or his designee, shall act as City’s representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have the complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to Consultant’s services.
City may unilaterally change its representative upon notice to the Consultant. (D) Give prompt written notice to Consultant whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in a project.
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. Acceptance by the City of the work to be performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of Consultant from professional responsibility for the work performed.
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless.
Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s performance of work hereunder, including the performance of work of any of Consultant’s subcontractors or agents, or Consultant’s failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in the agreement, except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.
11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance meeting the requirements specified in Exhibit A hereto.
12. Access to Records. Consultant shall maintain all preparatory books, records, documents, accounting ledgers, and similar materials including but not limited to calculation and survey notes relating to work performed for the City under this Agreement on file for at least three (3) years following the date of final payment to Consultant by City. Any duly authorized representative(s) of City shall have access to such records for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying at reasonable times during Consultant’s usual and customary business hours.
Consultant shall provide proper facilities to City’s representative(s) for such access and inspection.
809
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
13. Non-Assignability. It is recognized by the parties hereto that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. This Agreement is personal to Consultant and shall not be assigned by it without express written approval of the City.
14. Changes to Scope of Work. City may at any time, and upon a minimum of ten (10) days written notice, seek to modify the scope of services to be provided for any project to be completed under this Agreement. Consultant shall, upon receipt of said notice, determine the impact on both time and compensation of such change in scope and notify City in writing. Upon agreement between City and Consultant as to the extent of said impacts to time and compensation, an amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared describing such changes.
Execution of the amendment by City and Consultant shall constitute the Consultant’s notice to proceed with the changed scope.
15. Ownership of Documents. Title to all final documents, including drawings, specifications, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software (if purchased on the City’s behalf), video and audio tapes, software output, and any other materials with respect to work performed under this Agreement shall vest with City at such time as City has compensated Consultant, as provided herein, for the services rendered by Consultant in connection with which they were prepared. City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant against all damages, claims, lawsuits, and losses of any kind including defense costs arising out of any use of said documents, drawings, and/or specifications on any other project without written authorization of the Consultant.
16. Termination.
(A) City shall have the authority to terminate this Agreement, upon ten days written notice to Consultant, as follows:
(1) If in the City’s opinion the conduct of the Consultant is such that the interest of the City may be impaired or prejudiced, or
(2) For any reason whatsoever.
(B) Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of such amount as fairly compensates Consultant for all work satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination based upon the Consultant’s rates shown in Exhibit B and/or Section 3 of this Agreement, except that:
(1) In the event of termination by the City for Consultant’s default, City shall deduct from the amount due Consultant the total amount of additional expenses incurred by City as a result of such default. Such deduction from amounts due Consultant are made to compensate City for its actual additional costs incurred in securing satisfactory performance of the terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to, costs of engaging another consultant(s) for such purposes. In the event that such additional 810
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
expenses shall exceed amounts otherwise due and payable to Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall pay City the full amount of such expense. (C) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, Consultant shall:
(1) Upon receipt of written notice of such termination promptly cease all services on this project, unless otherwise directed by City; and (2) Deliver to City all documents, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software output, video and audio tapes, and any other materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement. Such material is to be delivered to City in completed form; however, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15 herein, City may condition payment for services rendered to the date of termination upon Consultant’s delivery to the City of such material.
(D) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, City is hereby expressly permitted to assume the projects and complete them by any means, including but not limited to, an agreement with another party.
(E) The rights and remedy of the City and Consultant provided under this Section are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or appearing in any other section of this Agreement.
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. Services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance and full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder.
18. Exhibits Incorporated. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement and attached to it are hereby incorporated in it by this reference. In the event there is a conflict between any of the terms of this Agreement and any of the terms of any exhibit to the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall control the respective duties and liabilities of the parties.
19. Independent Contractor. It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that Consultant, while engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Consultant expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee or servant of the City.
20. Integration and Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters contained herein. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except by amendment in writing signed by both parties. 811
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
21. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, County of Monterey, and City of Salinas.
Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in the State of California, in the County of Monterey or in the appropriate federal court with jurisdiction over the matter.
22. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, but the remainder of the Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect.
23. Notices.
(A) Written notices to the City hereunder shall, until further notice by City, be addressed to:
City Manager
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
With a copy to:
City Attorney
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
(B) Written notices to the Consultant shall, until further notice by the Consultant, be addressed to:
Joseph Herrnandez, President
Modern Times, Inc
680 E. Colorado Blvd, Suite 180 & 2nd Floor
Pasadena, CA 91101
213-810-6111
[email protected]
(C) The execution of any such notices by the City Manager shall be effective as to Consultant as if it were by resolution or order of the City Council, and Consultant shall not question the authority of the City to execute any such notice. (D) All such notices shall either be delivered personally to the other party’s designee named above, or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, properly addressed as aforesaid, postage fully prepaid, and shall be effective the day following such deposit in the mail. 812
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
24. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability.
25. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and declares that it presently has no interest, and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any manner or degree which will render the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law. Consultant further declares that, in the performance of this Agreement, no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000 et seq.) and Salinas City Code Chapter 2A that apply to Consultant as the result of Consultant’s performance of the work or services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
26. Headings. The section headings appearing herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of this Agreement.
27. Attorneys’ Fees. In case suit shall be brought to interpret or to enforce this Agreement, or because of the breach of any other covenant or provision herein contained, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to such costs as may be allowed by the Court. City’s attorneys’ fees, if awarded, shall be calculated at the market rate.
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive and both City and Consultant expressly reserves the right to contract with other entities for the same or similar services.
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not intend to create any obligations express or implied other than those set out herein; further, this Agreement shall not create any rights in any party not a signatory hereto.
30. Licenses. If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of Consultant, its representatives, agents or subcontractors by federal, state or local law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and that any applicable bond posted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement. 813
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
32. Legal Representation. Each party affirms that it has been represented, if it so chose, by legal counsel of its own choosing regarding the preparation and the negotiation of this Agreement and the matters and claims set forth herein, and that each of them has read this Agreement and is fully aware of its contents and its legal effect. Neither party is relying on any statement of the other party outside the terms set forth in this Agreement as an inducement to enter into this Agreement.
33. Joint Representation. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. No presumptions or rules of interpretation based upon the identity of the party preparing or drafting the Agreement, or any part thereof, shall be applicable or invoked.
34. Warranty of Authority. Each party represents and warrants that it has the right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement. Each party further represents and warrants that it has given any and all notices, and obtained any and all consents, powers, and authorities, necessary to permit it, and the persons entering into this Agreement for it, to enter into this Agreement.
35. No Waiver of Rights. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. The failure to provide notice of any breach of this Agreement or failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver thereof.
Failure on the part of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or any other provision. A waiver by the City of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be construed as waiver(s) of any other condition of performance under this Agreement.
36. Subject to Availability of Funds. In the event that the City Council, or other governing body, fails to appropriate or budget sufficient funds for the continuation of this agreement, or should funds become unavailable for any other reason, the City reserves the right to terminate this agreement upon written notice. This termination shall be effective as of the last day of the fiscal year for which funds were appropriated. Upon such termination, the Consultant will be limited to compensation for satisfactory services rendered up to the termination date.
37. Levine Act Disclosure Compliance (Cal Government Code Sec. 84308). Consultant hereby affirms and warrants that it has not contributed to the campaign of any elected or appointed City official an amount totaling more than $500 within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this Agreement, except as Consultant has disclosed within its Levine Act Disclosure Form submitted by Consultant to the City. Consultant agrees, that in the event it makes any contributions subject to the Levine Act’s disclosure requirements within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this Agreement, that it will file a Levine Act Disclosure Form (or Forms). Consultant acknowledges this duty of disclosure and that the City has made the Levine Act Disclosure Form(s) readily available on the City’s public internet site under Your Government / Transparency section for Consultant’s continuous compliance. 814
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
38. Electronic Execution of Agreement. The words “execution,” “signed,” “signature,” and words of like import in this Agreement and shall be deemed to include electronic signatures or electronic records (including, without limitation, DocuSign and AdobeSign), each of which shall be of the same legal effect, validity, enforceability, and admissibility as a handwritten signature.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF SALINAS
____________________________
René Mendez, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
□ Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney, or
□ Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney
815
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements
Insurance Requirements
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. With respect to General Liability and Professional Liability, coverage should be maintained for a minimum of five (5) years after Agreement completion.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(A)Commercial General Liability (“CGL”): Insurance Services Office Form (“ISO”) CG 00 01 covering CGL on an occurrence basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (B) Automobile Liability: ISO Form CA 0001 covering any auto, or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired and non-owned, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(C)Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(D)Professional Liability (also known as Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to the work being performed, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate per policy period of one year.
If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Salinas requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City of Salinas, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85, or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
Primary Coverage
816
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
For any claims related to this Agreement or the project described within this Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.
Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Salinas for all work performed by the Consultant, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared by Consultant to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, Consultant shall provide coverage to reduce or eliminate such self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the consultant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administrations, and defense expenses. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of Agreement work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the Agreement effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of Agreement work.
4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.
Verification of Coverage
817
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable insurance language effecting coverage required by this Agreement. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all sub-consultants and/or subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from such sub-consultants and/or subcontractors.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Maintenance of Insurance
Maintenance of insurance by Consultant as specified shall in no way be interpreted as relieving Consultant of its indemnification obligations or any responsibility whatsoever and the Consultant may carry, at its own expense, such additional insurance as it deems necessary. 818
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
Exhibit B- Scope of Service
819
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. March 2026
Modern Times, Inc
June 2026
820
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.salinas.gov
File #: ID#26-256, Version: 1
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Approve a Resolution establishing speed limits as recommended by the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 6/13/2026
powered by Legistar™821
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 16, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: ADRIANA ROBLES, PE, CFM, CITY ENGINEER
JONATHAN HERNANDEZ, JUNIOR ENGINEER
TITLE: 2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED
LIMITS
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a Resolution establishing speed limits as recommended by the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In California, an Engineering and Traffic Survey (“E&TS”) is the tool used to establish a speed limits, surveys are updated every 5-7 years and may be extended up to 14 years. Normally the speed limit is set at the closest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed calculated through the E&TS, but a single 5 mph reduction is permitted based on roadway conditions and constraints.
An additional 5 mph reduction maybe applied, based on California Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43), if the roadway has “vulnerable roadway users” or the corridor is considered a “safety corridor”.
Speed limits set further below these allowed reductions create a “speed trap” that may result in the removal of the ability for law enforcement to enforce the roadway with radar per the California Vehicle Code (CVC 40802).
There are twelve (12) speed surveys that will expire in the second half of 2026. Staff is presenting new E&TS for Council consideration. Approval of these surveys is required to allow law enforcement to continue using radar speed enforcement on these road segments.
BACKGROUND:
The routine analysis and establishment of speed limits on roadways ensures compliance with the Uniform Vehicle Code (UVC”) established by the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances.
822
Page | 2
Engineering & Traffic Survey (Speed Survey) Process
In California the use of Speed Surveys is defined by the California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) and the methodology is defined by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“MUTCD”). To set a speed limit, staff use a standard “85th percentile” survey outlined in the MUTCD. These surveys measure how fast people naturally drive during normal traffic, then set the limit to closest 5-mph mark of the speed used by 85% of those drivers. A 5-mph reduction is permitted based on roadway conditions and constraints.
California Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43) signed in 2021, gives local agencies more power to set speed limits based on safety goals. If a required traffic survey shows a limit is still unsafe, an agency can reduce the speed limit by an additional 5 mph in two cases: designation of a safety corridor or if the road is adjacent to a high-activity area, specifically a facility that may attract more vulnerable groups like children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities and the unhoused. Based on the MUTCD, a “safety corridor” is officially defined as a segment within the top 20% of the city’s network for crashes, or any road where these vulnerable groups are present within 1320 feet (1/4 mile).
Under CVC 40802, a “speed trap” is created if a speed survey is missing or if the limit is set lower than the 85th percentile and the allowable speed reductions. In these cases, police are legally prohibited from using radar to issue tickets on that road.
For example, a roadway segment with a measured 85th percentile speed of 37 mph may have a recommended speed limit of 35 mph. Per the CVC, a 5-mph reduction to 30 mph is justified when geometric constraints (horizontal or vertical curves) limit sight distance. Similarly, the limit may be further reduced by an additional 5-mph to 25 mph to account for high pedestrian and bicycle volumes associated with designed school routes or identified bicycle networks. Prior to Assembly Bill 43, if this same roadway segment were signed at 25 mph it would have be considered a “speed trap” and radar enforcement would not be permitted.
Salinas Engineering & Traffic Survey
There are 12 speed surveys set to expire in the second half of 2026. Following recent speed surveys, staff recommends the retention of the current posted speed limit for eight (8) segments, the reduction of the posted speed limit of three (3) segments (Towt Street, John Street, and Freedom Parkway), and an increase to the posted speed limit of one (1) segment (Sconberg Parkway). Table 1 provides the posted speed limits along with the measured speeds on the 12 roadway segments.
Table 1. Speed Survey Findings
No. Street Segment Speed Survey Study Limits
Posted
Speed
Limit
85th Percentile
Measured Speed
Rec
Speed
Limit
1 Chaparral Street North Main Street to Natividad Road 25 24 -- 2 Towt Street East Alisal Street to Garner Avenue 30 32 25 3 Post Drive Calle del Adobe to North Davis Road 30 32 -- 823
Page | 3
No. Street Segment Speed Survey Study Limits
Posted
Speed
Limit
85th Percentile
Measured Speed
Rec
Speed
Limit
4 Monterey Street West Market Street to John Street 25 26 -- 5 Terven Avenue South Sanborn Road to Airport Boulevard 25 22 -- 6 Hansen Street Airport Boulevard to Harkins Road 30 34 -- 7 John Street Wood Street to East Alisal Street 35 38 30 8 Freedom Parkway Williams Road to Sconberg Parkway 35 38 30 9 Sconberg Parkway Alisal Road to Freedom Parkway 25 43 35 10 North Davis Road Larkin Street to Westridge Parkway 35 39 -- 11 Alisal Street Capitol Street to Front Street 25 30 -- 12 Towt Street Garner Avenue to Freedom Parkway 25 31 -- The measured 85th percentile speed on Towt Street (East Alisal St to Garner Ave) is 32 mph.
While standard speed survey procedures allow for the speed limit adjustment to be rounded to 30 mph. Staff recommends applying a 5-mph reduction based on safety to set the new speed limit at 25 mph.
The measured 85th percentile speed on John Street (Wood Street and East Alisal Street) is 38 mph.
Following standard speed survey procedures, the speed limit would be set at 40 mph. Staff recommends applying the 5-mph reduction based on safety and also applying an additional 5-mph reduction (AB 43) given the proximity to two elementary schools and high pedestrian activity. The recommended speed limit is 30 mph.
Similarly, Freedom Parkway has a measured 85th percentile speed of 38 mph, the rounded measured speed limit would be 40 mph. Staff recommends applying a 5-mph safety reduction to set the speed limit at 35 mph, allowed by MUTCD and also applying the 5-mph reduction allowed by AB 43. Freedom Parkway is located along the northesterly side of Monte Bella Elementary School and Monte Bella Community Park and has bike lane facilities which encourage vulnerable roadways users to the street. Staff recommends a speed limit of 30 mph for Freedom Parkway.
Additionally, the radar speed survey conducted for Sconberg Parkway measured the 85th percentile speed at 43 mph, the rounded speed limit would be 45 mph. Applying the 5-mph safety reduction would result in a speed limit of 40 mph. However, due to the proximity of Bardin Elementary School and bike lane facilities on Sconberg Parkway, a 35 mph speed limit is recommended by staff.
Table 2 provides the recommended speed limits for the 12 roadway segments.
Table 2: 2026 Recommended Speed Limits
Street Segment Speed Survey Study Limits
Posted Speed Limit AB 43
Applied Existing Recommended
Chaparral Street North Main Street to Natividad Road 25 25 No 824
Page | 4
Street Segment Speed Survey Study Limits
Posted Speed Limit AB 43
Applied Existing Recommended
Towt Street East Alisal Street to Garner Avenue 30 25 No Post Drive Calle del Adobe to North Davis Road 30 30 No Monterey Street West Market Street to John Street 25 25 No Terven Avenue South Sanborn Road to Airport
Boulevard 25 25 No
Hansen Street Airport Boulevard to Harkins Road 30 30 No John Street Wood Street to East Alisal Street 35 30 Yes Freedom Parkway Williams Road to Sconberg Parkway 35 30 Yes Sconberg Parkway Alisal Road to Freedom Parkway 25 35 Yes North Davis Road Larkin Street to Westridge Parkway 35 35 No Alisal Street Capitol Street to Front Street 25 25 No
Towt Street Garner Avenue to Freedom Parkway 25 25 No
If safety is a concern, why not keep the existing speed limit signs low to slow the speed of traffic? California law prohibits the arbitrary posting of reduced speed limits. Doing so can create a “speed trap,” which legally restricts law enforcement from using radar for speed enforcement and often leads to higher overall vehicle speeds. However, AB 43 provides flexibility allowing the City Council to establish safety corridors and reduce speed limits for the benefit of vulnerable road users.
Traffic and Transportation Commission
The recommendation for the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits was presented to the Traffic and Transportation Commission at its May 14, 2026, meeting.
The commission expressed concerns with increasing the posted speed limit at Sconberg Parkway as recommended in the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report.
The Commission voted (5-1) on an alternate motion to recommend City Council approve the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey with the exception of Sconberg Parkway. The Commission’s concerns are understandable but setting the speed limit below the allowable speed, based on established laws, would also be arbitrary and capricious and the speed limit at Sconberg Parkway would not be enforceable. Staff recommends City Council to approve the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits including the increase of the current posted speed limit at Sconberg Parkway based on the data provided.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it 825
Page | 5
can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The establishment of legitimate speed limits support the City Council’s goal of “Public Safety”.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The Public Works Department staff survey, recommend, monitor, and install posted speed limits.
Established speed zones allow the Salinas Police Department to enforce posted speed limits. Public Works provides the Police Department and the Traffic Court with updates and changes to the established speed limits for proper enforcement.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
Funding is available and appropriated in CIP 9162.
Fund General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name
Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Attachment 1: 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Technical Report Attachment 2: FHWA Functional Classification Maps
Attachment 3: Speed Limit Informational Brochure
826
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE 2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR
SPEED LIMITS
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358, local municipalities have the power to increase or decrease prima facie speed limits for local streets; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 40802 and provisions of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Engineering and Traffic Surveys must be performed on those local streets every five to seven years when the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects are utilized to enforce the prima facie speed limits for those streets; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code defines a speed trap and prohibits evidence of a driver’s speed obtained through a speed trap from being admissible in court in any prosecution against a driver for a speed-related offense; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code deems a road where the speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted within the previous 5 to 7 years to be a speed trap, unless the roadway has been evaluated by a registered engineer in which case the speed limit remains enforceable for a period of 14 years and exempts a school zone from certain provisions relating to defining a speed trap; and
WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2024, the State of California, through Assembly Bill 43, granted local jurisdictions the authority to retain or reduce speed limits a maximum of 5 mph below the current posted speed limit without creating a speed trap following an Engineering and Traffic Survey evaluated by a registered engineer; and
WHEREAS, the results of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code; and WHEREAS, Staff have concluded those speed limits set forth in the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Speed Limits attached hereto are justified for their associated street segments in that they are found to be most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and are reasonable and safe for those street segments; and WHEREAS, at its May 14, 2026, meeting, the Traffic and Transportation Commission voted (5-1) on an alternate recommendation to recommend to City Council to approve the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits with the exception of Sconberg Parkway; and
WHEREAS, setting a speed limit below the measured 85th percentile speeds and beyond the reductions allowed by law, would be arbitrary and capricious and the speed limit would not be enforceable by radar and is therefore not recommended by staff; and 827
Page | 2
WHEREAS, the speed limits recommended by the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits are as follows:
Street Segment Speed Survey Study Limits Posted Speed Limit Existing Recommended
Chaparral Street North Main Street to Natividad Road 25 25 Towt Street East Alisal Street to Garner Avenue 30 25
Post Drive Calle del Adobe to North Davis Road 30 30
Monterey Street West Market Street to John Street 25 25 Terven Avenue South Sanborn Road to Airport Boulevard 25 25 Hansen Street Airport Boulevard to Harkins Road 30 30
John Street Wood Street to East Alisal Street 35 30
Freedom Parkway Williams Road to Sconberg Parkway 35 30 Sconberg Parkway Alisal Road to Freedom Parkway 25 35
North Davis Road Larkin Street to Westridge Parkway 35 35 Alisal Street Capitol Street to Front Street 25 25
Towt Street Garner Avenue to Freedom Parkway 25 25
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has determined that the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15301, Class 1). The proposed action has no potential to cause any effect on the environment and does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby approves the speed limits as recommended by 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Staff is hereby directed to proceed with the establishment of the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits to fully effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
828
Page | 3
_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
829
City of Salinas
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 200 Lincoln Ave • Salinas, California 93901 (831) 758-7241 • (831) 758-7935 (Fax) •www.salinas.gov
2026
Engineering and Traffic Survey
For Speed Limits
Technical Report
PREPARED BY:
City of Salinas
Public Works Department
Traffic and Transportation Division
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, CA 93901
830
CERTIFICATION
I, Adriana Robles, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Salinas was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am experienced in performing surveys of this type and duly registered in the State of California as professional Civil Engineer.
Adriana Robles, PE, CFM
City Engineer
831
INTRODUCTION:
The 2026 Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) in the City of Salinas fulfills California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358, which require local agencies to follow certain procedures established by the State of California. The E&TS are intended to serve as the basis for establishing and enforcing the speed limits for specific streets in the City. The work herein by the City Traffic and Transportation Engineering Division staff, in accordance with the California CVC Section 40802, reviews the established speed limit sections to determine whether changes in existing conditions have occurred which may require adjusting the posted speed limit.
Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802 of the CVC and the national Uniform Vehicle Code. E&TS may be extended to every seven (7) years if the arresting officer has completed device training and the device has been recently calibrated. E&TS may be extended every fourteen (14) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or surrounding land uses have occurred as specified in the CVC. An E&TS should be conducted on new roadways or where traffic conditions have changed significantly.
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), as required under CVC 21400, defines standards for posting speed limits that rely upon collecting speed data in the field to determine the 85th percentile speed, which is subsequently rounded upward or downward to the nearest 5 mile per hour increment. The CA-MUTCD allows for options to further reduce the speed limit. Additionally, local authorities are allowed to further reduce speed limits to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrians under Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43). Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary summarizes the findings and recommendations for speed limits on those segments. The results of the E&TS will be valid until 2031, see Table 1 for details, unless extended through additional criteria.
METHODOLOGY:
On January 1, 2012, CVC 21400(b) became effective requiring the California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to revise the CA-MUTCD so that speed limits are based on field-collected speed data. A spot speed survey that typically consists of measuring vehicle speeds with an electronic device, most commonly a radar speed detector. Traffic traveling at free-flow speeds in each direction for a two-way street is collected and compiled to create a data set. The most significant data point collected is the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of motor vehicles travel. The 85th percentile speed is the industry standard data point which typically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. The reason that speed limit areas are established and posted is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of a reckless or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other laws, speed limits are established based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive a section of roadway as to what speed is reasonable and safe.
As specified in the California MUTCD Section 2B.13, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” Additionally, the MUTCD allows the posted speed limit to be lowered by no more than 5 mph from a rounded speed, using one of two options that depend on whether the 85th percentile speed has been rounded down or up. The options may be applied as follows:
1. MUTCD Section 2B.13 states, “The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.” The cited CVC Section 627 defines an E&T survey that is required to consider prevailing speeds, accident records, and conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and optionally consider residential density as well as pedestrian and bicycle safety. According to the MUTCD, this option requires documentation of an E&T Survey that “shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.” The basis for a speed limit that is more than 5 mph lower than the 85th percentile speed is something other than prevailing speeds. In regard to conditions not readily apparent to the driver, CVC 22358 states that “physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.”
2. MUTCD Section 2B.13 12a also states “For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5-mph increment 832 below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.” An Option 2 round-down, which became available when CVC Section 21400(b) went into effect January 1, 2012, requires no E&T Survey to post the speed limit sign. The E&T Survey is required nevertheless, however, to allow radar or similar devices to be used for enforcement.
Neither the Vehicle Code nor the MUTCD provide much specific guidance regarding accident data or pedestrian or bicycle safety. In contrast, CVC 627(c)(1) provides specific guidance on residential density. Many residential neighborhoods in Salinas meet the density threshold of 16 separate dwelling houses or business structures per quarter mile. The statute does not apply to roads within a business district.
While the California MUTCD allows two options for lowering the posted speed, it has no provision for raising the speed limit above the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey for twelve (12) roadway sections are listed in Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary:
833
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS EXPIRING 2031:
Unchanged
23) Chaparral Street between North Main Street and Natividad Road - This segment of Chaparral Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes. Speed data collected on April 15, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 24 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 17 mph to 26 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. 108) Post Drive between Calle del Adobe and North Davis Road - This segment of Post Drive is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes school, commercial and retail use. Speed data collected on April 20, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 21 mph to 30 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be retained. 115) Monterey Street between West Market Street and John Street - This segment of Monterey Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes retail and commercial use. Speed data collected on April 14, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 19 mph to 28 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. 119) Terven Avenue between South Sanborn Road and Airport Boulevard - This segment of Terven Avenue is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes commercial and industrial use. Speed data collected on May 4, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
120) Hansen Street between Airport Boulevard and Harkins Road - This segment of Hansen Street is classified as a collector street in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes commercial use. Speed data collected on April 22, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 34 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 25 mph to 34 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be retained.
125) North Davis Road between Larkin Street and Westridge Parkway - This segment of North Davis Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes school and retail. Speed data collected on April 17, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 39 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 27 mph to 36 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be retained.
126) Alisal Street between Capitol Street and Front Street - This segment of Alisal Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes retail and commercial. Speed data collected on April 15, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 30 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
127) Towt Street between Garner Avenue and Freedom Parkway - This segment of Towt Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential homes and a school. Speed data collected on April 29, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace 834 range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained.
Reduced
72) Towt Street between East Alisal Street and Garner Avenue - This segment of Garner Avenue is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes schools, parks, and backing and fronting residential homes. Speed data collected on April 16, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be reduced to 25 mph. 122) John Street between Wood Street and East Alisal Street - This segment of John Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes schools and residential homes. Speed data collected on April 14, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 38 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 29 mph to 38 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph, and the presence of pedestrian/bicyclist infrastructure allowing for an additional 5 mph reduction under AB 43, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph.
123) Freedom Parkway between Williams Road and Sconberg Parkway - This segment of Freedom Parkway is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes backing residential homes, schools, and a park. Speed data collected on April 23, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 38 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to 37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph, and the presence of pedestrian/bicyclist infrastructure allowing for an additional 5 mph reduction under AB 43, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph.
Increased
124) Sconberg Parkway between Alisal Road and Freedom Parkway - This segment of Sconberg Parkway between Alisal Road and Freedom Parkway is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes a school, backing residential homes, and agricultural use. Speed data collected on May 5, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 43 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 34 mph to 43 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph, and the presence of pedestrian/bicyclist infrastructure allowing for an additional 5 mph reduction under AB 43, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be increased to 35 mph.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Engineering and Traffic Surveys contained in Appendix A of this report are intended to establish and justify posted speed limits that can be enforced by radar. The posted speed limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of speeds considered reasonable for a particular section of highway for prevailing conditions. The posted speed limits are not absolute maximums, but rather prima facie speed limits for which violations would be cited under the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350 of the CVC). CVC 22350 states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe, having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit merely suggests a safe speed under normal conditions.
835
Table 1: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
No. Street Segment
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th-Percentile Speed (mph) MUTCD
Applied
Reduction
Option
AB 43
Applied
Survey
Measured Rounded Expiration Recommended
23 Chaparral Street North Main Street to Natividad Road 25 24 25 25 2 No 04/15/2031 72 Towt Street East Alisal Street to Garner Avenue 30 32 30 25 1 No 04/16/2031 108 Post Drive Calle del Adobe to North Davis Road 30 32 30 30 1 No 04/20/2031 115 Monterey Street West Market Street to John Street 25 26 25 25 1 No 04/14/2031 119 Terven Avenue South Sanborn Road to Airport Boulevard 25 32 30 25 1 No 05/04/2031 120 Hansen Street Airport Boulevard to Harkins Road 30 34 35 30 2 No 04/22/2031 122 John Street Wood Street to East Alisal Street 35 38 40 30 2 Yes 04/14/2031 123 Freedom Parkway Williams Road to Sconberg Parkway 35 38 40 30 2 Yes 04/23/2031 124 Sconberg Parkway Alisal Road to Freedom Parkway 25 43 45 35 2 Yes 05/05/2031 125 North Davis Road Larkin Street to Westridge Parkway 35 39 40 35 2 No 04/17/2031 126 Alisal Street Capitol Street to Front Street 25 30 30 25 1 No 04/15/2031 127 Towt Street Garner Avenue to Freedom Parkway 25 31 30 25 1 No 04/29/2026 836
COLLISION HISTORY
The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available collision information for each of the street segments.
The collision information was obtained from the City of Salinas from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2025. For this analysis, only collisions during the 2-year period between January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2025 were considered. The collisions were reviewed and only corridor related collisions, those not related to signalized intersections, were summarized for each segment. Based on the number of total collisions studied over the 2-year period and average daily traffic (ADT) counts, a collision rate was calculated for each segment. The collision rates for each segment were compared to the statewide average rate listed in the 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways, to provide a general comparison of the collision rates on the segments to expected collisions rates for similar types of roadways, shown in Table 2: Collision Rate Summary.
Lane Type Total Statewide Urban Collision Rate
(2021, 2022, 2023)
(Total per million vehicle miles)
2 and 3 lane 1.03
4+ lanes (undivided) 1.27
4+ lanes (divided) 0.97
837
Table 2: Collision Rate Summary
No. Street Segment Existing Facility Length
(mi) AADT
Collisions
(2 years)
(2024-2025)
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
Statewide
Collision
Rate
(Acc./MVM)
23 Chaparral Street North Main Street to Natividad Road 2 and 3 lane 1.05 1,939 3 2.02 1.03 72 Towt Street East Alisal Street to Garner Avenue 2 and 3 lane 0.96 4,764 16 4.79 1.03 108 Post Drive Calle del Adobe to North Davis Road 4+ lanes (undivided) 0.21 4,750 0 0.00 1.27 115 Monterey Street West Market Street to John Street 2 and 3 lane 0.49 10,194 5 1.37 1.03 119 Terven Avenue South Sanborn Road to Airport Boulevard 2 and 3 lane 0.39 16,633 0 0.00 1.03 120 Hansen Street Airport Boulevard to Harkins Road 4+ lanes (undivided) 0.20 17,697 2 0.77 1.27 122 John Street Wood Street to East Alisal Street 2 and 3 lane 0.97 19,138 28 2.07 1.03 123 Freedom Parkway Williams Road to Sconberg Parkway 4+ lanes (divided) 0.64 2,022 0 0.00 0.97 124 Sconberg Parkway Alisal Road to Freedom Parkway 2 and 3 lane 0.67 4,902 0 0.00 1.03 125 North Davis Road Larkin Street to Westridge Parkway 4+ lanes (divided) 0.73 27,107 8 0.55 0.97 126 Alisal Street Capitol Street to Front Street 2 and 3 lane 0.62 12,442 16 2.84 1.03 127 Towt Street Garner Avenue to Freedom Parkway 2 and 3 lane 0.82 3,653 16 7.32 1.03 838
APPENDIX A
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS
839
STOP STOP STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years) Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles) Approximately 5,550 Feet Flat Varies (44 to 56 Feet) 2-Lane Collector 1,939 3 Collisions (2024-2025) 2.02 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 24 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: CHAPARRAL STREET NATIVIDAD RD & N MAIN ST 04/15/26 (EXPIRES 2031) 23 This segment of Chaparral Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes fronting residential homes. Speed data collected on April 15, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 24 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 17 mph to 26 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION CHAPARRAL ST north salinas high school
MARYAL DR
TAPADERO ST NOICE DR N MAIN ST
LINWOOD DR
TAMPICO AVE
TRAZADO AVE
GRANADA AVE
ROMONA AVE NATIVIDAD RD
BOLERO AVE
SONORA WAY SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFES IONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(23) Chaparral St btwn Natividad & N Main.dwg 840
Direction: EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 2 4.00% 4.00%
16 1 2.00% 6.00% 15 To: 24 MPH
17 3 6.00% 12.00%
18 4 8.00% 20.00%
19 6 12.00% 32.00% MPH
20 8 16.00% 48.00% MPH
21 6 12.00% 60.00% MPH
22 5 10.00% 70.00% MPH
23 7 14.00% 84.00%
24 4 8.00% 92.00%
25 2 4.00% 96.00%
26 1 2.00% 98.00%
27 0 0.00% 98.00%
28 0 0.00% 98.00%
29 0 0.00% 98.00%
30 1 2.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.4 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Enrique S
02:50
Wednesday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
46 21
Vehicles in Pace:
03:40
04/15/26
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
2.9 0.1710
92.0%
25 24
Standard Deviation:
No. 23
24 20.8
8.55 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Chaparral Street Comments:
Main Street & Natividad Road
330 Chaparral Street
841
Direction: WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 17 To: 26 MPH
17 2 4.00% 4.00%
18 4 8.00% 12.00%
19 6 12.00% 24.00% MPH
20 9 18.00% 42.00% MPH
21 6 12.00% 54.00% MPH
22 8 16.00% 70.00% MPH
23 4 8.00% 78.00%
24 5 10.00% 88.00%
25 4 8.00% 96.00%
26 1 2.00% 98.00%
27 0 0.00% 98.00%
28 0 0.00% 98.00%
29 0 0.00% 98.00%
30 1 2.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 24
90th Percentile Speed: 25
Vehicles in Pace: 49
50th Percentile Speed: 21
95th Percentile Speed: 25
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 98.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.1356
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 21.4
Sample Variance: 6.78
No. 23
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Enrique S
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Chaparral Street
Between: Main Street & Natividad Road
Survey Location: 330 Chaparral Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/15/26 Wednesday
2:50 3:40
842
Direction: EBD/WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 2 2.00% 2.00%
16 1 1.00% 3.00% 17 To: 26 MPH
17 5 5.00% 8.00%
18 8 8.00% 16.00%
19 12 12.00% 28.00% MPH
20 17 17.00% 45.00% MPH
21 12 12.00% 57.00% MPH
22 13 13.00% 70.00% MPH
23 11 11.00% 81.00%
24 9 9.00% 90.00%
25 6 6.00% 96.00%
26 2 2.00% 98.00%
27 0 0.00% 98.00%
28 0 0.00% 98.00%
29 0 0.00% 98.00%
30 2 2.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 25
85th Percentile Speed: 24
90th Percentile Speed: 24
Vehicles in Pace: 95
50th Percentile Speed: 21
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 95.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.0766
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 21.1
Sample Variance: 7.66
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Enrique S
Street: Chaparral Street Comments:
Between: Main Street & Natividad Road No. 23
Survey Location: 330 Chaparral Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/15/26 Wednesday
2:50 3:40
843
844
E ALISAL ST
EL SAUSAL MIDDLE SCHOOL
CLOSTER PARK
E MARKET ST
E LAUREL DR
GARNER AVE
1ST AVE
2ND AVE
MYRTLE ST
KENTUCKY AVE
OREGON ST
FAIRHAVEN ST
ALMA AVE
ACOSTA ST
FREEMONT
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
DEWEY AVE
GRANDHAVEN ST
BELLEHAVEN ST
COOPER AVE STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 5,100 Feet Flat Varies (36 to 54 Feet) 2-Lane Collector 4,764 16 Collisions (2024-2025)4.79 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 32 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: TOWT STREET E ALISAL ST & GARNER AVE 04/16/2026 (EXPIRES 2031) 72 This segment of Garner Avenue is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes schools, parks, and backing and fronting residential homes. Speed data collected on April 16, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be reduced to 25 mph. DESCRIPTION SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(72) Towt St btwn Alisal & Garner.dwg 845
Direction: EBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 22 To: 31 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 4 8.00% 8.00% MPH
23 2 4.00% 12.00%
24 2 4.00% 16.00%
25 3 6.00% 22.00%
26 8 16.00% 38.00%
27 4 8.00% 46.00%
28 4 8.00% 54.00%
29 6 12.00% 66.00%
30 5 10.00% 76.00%
31 2 4.00% 80.00%
32 4 8.00% 88.00%
33 2 4.00% 92.00%
34 1 2.00% 94.00%
35 1 2.00% 96.00%
36 2 4.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.7 0.2690
80.0%
35 32
Standard Deviation:
No. 72
33 28.1
13.45 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
40 28
Vehicles in Pace:
02:20
04/16/26
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Allen
Towt Street Comments:
01:30
Thursday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
East Alisal Street & Garner Avenue
424 Towt Street
846
Direction: WBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 1 2.00% 2.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 2.00%
18 1 2.00% 4.00%
19 0 0.00% 4.00% MPH
20 1 2.00% 6.00% MPH
21 1 2.00% 8.00% MPH
22 2 4.00% 12.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 14.00%
24 4 8.00% 22.00%
25 1 2.00% 24.00%
26 5 10.00% 34.00%
27 7 14.00% 48.00%
28 5 10.00% 58.00%
29 6 12.00% 70.00%
30 2 4.00% 74.00%
31 1 2.00% 76.00%
32 5 10.00% 86.00%
33 2 4.00% 90.00%
34 2 4.00% 94.00%
35 1 2.00% 96.00%
36 0 0.00% 96.00%
37 0 0.00% 96.00%
38 1 2.00% 98.00%
39 0 0.00% 98.00%
40 1 2.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Street: Towt Street Comments:
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Allen
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.9
Sample Variance: 21.86
No. 72
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.7
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 76.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.7
Variance of the Mean: 0.4372
85th Percentile Speed: 32
90th Percentile Speed: 33
Vehicles in Pace: 38
50th Percentile Speed: 28
95th Percentile Speed: 35
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Between: East Alisal Street & Garner Avenue
Survey Location: 424 Towt Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/16/26 Thursday
1:30 2:20
847
Direction: EBD/WBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 1 1.00% 1.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 1.00%
18 1 1.00% 2.00%
19 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
20 1 1.00% 3.00% MPH
21 1 1.00% 4.00% MPH
22 6 6.00% 10.00% MPH
23 3 3.00% 13.00%
24 6 6.00% 19.00%
25 4 4.00% 23.00%
26 13 13.00% 36.00%
27 11 11.00% 47.00%
28 9 9.00% 56.00%
29 12 12.00% 68.00%
30 7 7.00% 75.00%
31 3 3.00% 78.00%
32 9 9.00% 87.00%
33 4 4.00% 91.00%
34 3 3.00% 94.00%
35 2 2.00% 96.00%
36 2 2.00% 98.00%
37 0 0.00% 98.00%
38 1 1.00% 99.00%
39 0 0.00% 99.00%
40 1 1.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Allen
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 28.0
Sample Variance: 17.49
Weather: Clear
95th Percentile Speed: 35
Towt Street
85th Percentile Speed: 32
90th Percentile Speed: 33
Vehicles in Pace: 78
50th Percentile Speed: 28
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 78.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.1749
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
No. 72
Survey Location: 424 Towt Street
Speed Limit:
Street: Comments:
Between: East Alisal Street & Garner Avenue
Date: 04/16/26 Thursday
1:30 2:20
848
849
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 1,100 Feet Flat 56 Feet 4-Lane Major Arterial 4,750 0 Collisions (2025-2026)0.00 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH 32 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: POST DRIVE N DAVIS RD & CALLE DEL ADOBE 04/20/2026 (EXPIRES 2031) 108 This segment of Post Drive is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes school, commercial and retail use. Speed data collected on April 20, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 21 mph to 30 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION POST DR CALLE DEL ADOBE N DAVIS RD SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(108) Post Dr btwn N Davis & Calle Del Adobe.dwg 850
Direction: SBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 1 2.00% 2.00% 23 To: 32 MPH
17 0 0.00% 2.00%
18 0 0.00% 2.00%
19 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
20 1 2.00% 4.00% MPH
21 1 2.00% 6.00% MPH
22 1 2.00% 8.00% MPH
23 2 4.00% 12.00%
24 4 8.00% 20.00%
25 6 12.00% 32.00%
26 4 8.00% 40.00%
27 3 6.00% 46.00%
28 8 16.00% 62.00%
29 6 12.00% 74.00%
30 4 8.00% 82.00%
31 0 0.00% 82.00%
32 3 6.00% 88.00%
33 0 0.00% 88.00%
34 2 4.00% 92.00%
35 1 2.00% 94.00%
36 0 0.00% 94.00%
37 2 4.00% 98.00%
38 0 0.00% 98.00%
39 0 0.00% 98.00%
40 0 0.00% 98.00%
41 1 2.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.6 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Christopher
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
40 28
Vehicles in Pace:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
4.5 0.4078
80.0%
37 32
Standard Deviation:
No. 108
34 27.8
20.39 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Post Drive Comments:
Calle De Adobe & N Davis Road
1019 Post Drive
Monday
1:27
04/20/26
2:17
851
Direction: NBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 1 2.00% 2.00% 22 To: 31 MPH
17 1 2.00% 4.00%
18 2 4.00% 8.00%
19 3 6.00% 14.00% MPH
20 1 2.00% 16.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 16.00% MPH
22 4 8.00% 24.00% MPH
23 3 6.00% 30.00%
24 6 12.00% 42.00%
25 6 12.00% 54.00%
26 3 6.00% 60.00%
27 3 6.00% 66.00%
28 2 4.00% 70.00%
29 4 8.00% 78.00%
30 1 2.00% 80.00%
31 1 2.00% 82.00%
32 2 4.00% 86.00%
33 1 2.00% 88.00%
34 1 2.00% 90.00%
35 0 0.00% 90.00%
36 1 2.00% 92.00%
37 1 2.00% 94.00%
38 0 0.00% 94.00%
39 0 0.00% 94.00%
40 0 0.00% 94.00%
41 1 2.00% 96.00%
42 0 0.00% 96.00%
43 0 0.00% 96.00%
44 1 2.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 1 2.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 32
90th Percentile Speed: 34
Vehicles in Pace: 33
50th Percentile Speed: 25
95th Percentile Speed: 41
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.9
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 66.0%
Standard Deviation: 6.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.8344
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 26.5
Sample Variance: 41.72
No. 108
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Christopher
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Post Drive
Between: Calle De Adobe & N Davis Road
Survey Location: 1019 Post Drive
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/20/26 Monday
1:27 2:17
852
Direction: SBD/NBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 2 2.00% 2.00% 21 To: 30 MPH
17 1 1.00% 3.00%
18 2 2.00% 5.00%
19 3 3.00% 8.00% MPH
20 2 2.00% 10.00% MPH
21 1 1.00% 11.00% MPH
22 5 5.00% 16.00% MPH
23 5 5.00% 21.00%
24 10 10.00% 31.00%
25 12 12.00% 43.00%
26 7 7.00% 50.00%
27 6 6.00% 56.00%
28 10 10.00% 66.00%
29 10 10.00% 76.00%
30 5 5.00% 81.00%
31 1 1.00% 82.00%
32 5 5.00% 87.00%
33 1 1.00% 88.00%
34 3 3.00% 91.00%
35 1 1.00% 92.00%
36 1 1.00% 93.00%
37 3 3.00% 96.00%
38 0 0.00% 96.00%
39 0 0.00% 96.00%
40 0 0.00% 96.00%
41 2 2.00% 98.00%
42 0 0.00% 98.00%
43 0 0.00% 98.00%
44 1 1.00% 99.00%
45 0 0.00% 99.00%
46 1 1.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 37
85th Percentile Speed: 32
90th Percentile Speed: 34
Vehicles in Pace: 71
50th Percentile Speed: 26
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 71.0%
Standard Deviation: 5.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.3116
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.1
Sample Variance: 31.16
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Christopher
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Survey Location: 1019 Post Drive
Speed Limit:
Post Drive
No. 108
Street: Comments:
Between: Calle De Adobe & N Davis Road
Date: 04/20/26 Monday
1:27 2:17
853
854
E SAN LUIS ST
E GABILAN ST
W MARKET ST
E ALISAL ST MONTEREY ST JOHN ST CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,600 Feet Flat 47 Feet 3-Lane Major Arterial 10,194 5 Collisions (2024-2025)1.37 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone
85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 26 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: MONTEREY STREET W MARKET ST & JOHN ST 08/11/21 (EXPIRES IN 2026) 115 This segment of Monterey Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes retail and commercial use. Speed data collected on April 14, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 26 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 19 mph to 28 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(115) Monterey St btwn W Market & John.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES 855
Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 19 To: 28 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 2 2.00% 2.00%
19 4 4.00% 6.00% MPH
20 7 7.00% 13.00% MPH
21 10 10.00% 23.00% MPH
22 16 16.00% 39.00% MPH
23 16 16.00% 55.00%
24 16 16.00% 71.00%
25 10 10.00% 81.00%
26 8 8.00% 89.00%
27 3 3.00% 92.00%
28 4 4.00% 96.00%
29 3 3.00% 99.00%
30 1 1.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.3 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
94 23
Vehicles in Pace:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
2.6 0.0661
94.0%
28 26
Standard Deviation:
No. 115
27 23.3
6.61 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Monterey Street Comments:
W Market Street & John Street
345 Monterey Street
Tuesday
1:28
04/14/26
2:00
856
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
11 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! MPH
12 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
13 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
14 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
15 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
16 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! To: #DIV/0! MPH
17 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
18 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
19 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! MPH
20 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! MPH
21 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! MPH
22 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! MPH
23 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
24 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
25 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
26 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
27 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
28 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
29 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
30 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
31 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
32 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
33 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
34 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
35 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
36 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
37 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
38 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
39 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
40 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
41 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
42 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
43 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
44 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
45 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
46 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
47 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
48 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
49 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
50 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
51 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
52 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
53 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
54 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Totals: 0 #DIV/0!
85th Percentile Speed: #N/A
90th Percentile Speed: #N/A
Vehicles in Pace: #DIV/0!
50th Percentile Speed: #N/A
95th Percentile Speed: #N/A
Standard Error of the Mean: #DIV/0!
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: #DIV/0!
Standard Deviation: #DIV/0!
Variance of the Mean: #DIV/0!
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: #DIV/0!
Sample Variance: #DIV/0!
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
1:28 2:00
Monterey Street
Between: W Market Street & John Street
Survey Location: 345 Monterey Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/14/26 Tuesday
No. 115, No vehicles counted
southbound
857
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 19 To: 28 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 2 2.00% 2.00%
19 4 4.00% 6.00% MPH
20 7 7.00% 13.00% MPH
21 10 10.00% 23.00% MPH
22 16 16.00% 39.00% MPH
23 16 16.00% 55.00%
24 16 16.00% 71.00%
25 10 10.00% 81.00%
26 8 8.00% 89.00%
27 3 3.00% 92.00%
28 4 4.00% 96.00%
29 3 3.00% 99.00%
30 1 1.00% 100.00%
31 0 0.00% 100.00%
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 28
85th Percentile Speed: 26
90th Percentile Speed: 27
Vehicles in Pace: 94
50th Percentile Speed: 23
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 94.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.0661
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 23.3
Sample Variance: 6.61
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Monterey Street Comments:
Between: W Market Street & John Street No.115
Survey Location: 345 Monterey Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/14/26 Tuesday
1:28 2:00
858
859
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 2,100 Feet Flat 42 Feet 2-Lane Collector 16,633 0 Collisions (2024-2025)0.00 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 32 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: TERVEN AVENUE N SANBORN RD & AIRPORT BLVD 05/04/26 (EXPIRES IN 2031) 119 This segment of Terven Avenue is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes commercial and industrial use. Speed data collected on May 4, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION TERVEN AVE
VERTIN AVE
N SANBORN RD
HWY 101
AIRPORT BLVD
I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(119) Terven Ave btwn Sanborn & Airport.dwg SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES 860
Direction: EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 To: 32 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 4.00%
24 5 10.00% 14.00%
25 2 4.00% 18.00%
26 6 12.00% 30.00%
27 4 8.00% 38.00%
28 3 6.00% 44.00%
29 7 14.00% 58.00%
30 1 2.00% 60.00%
31 5 10.00% 70.00%
32 9 18.00% 88.00%
33 1 2.00% 90.00%
34 1 2.00% 92.00%
35 1 2.00% 94.00%
36 0 0.00% 94.00%
37 2 4.00% 98.00%
38 1 2.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.8 0.2868
86.0%
37 32
Standard Deviation:
No. 119
33 29.1
14.34 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
43 29
Vehicles in Pace:
02:15
05/04/26
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo and Allen
01:36
Monday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Terven Avenue Comments:
Sanborn Road & Airport Boulevard
1061 Terven Avenue
861
Direction: WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 2 4.00% 4.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 4.00% MPH
22 2 4.00% 8.00% MPH
23 2 4.00% 12.00%
24 1 2.00% 14.00%
25 3 6.00% 20.00%
26 5 10.00% 30.00%
27 5 10.00% 40.00%
28 6 12.00% 52.00%
29 6 12.00% 64.00%
30 6 12.00% 76.00%
31 2 4.00% 80.00%
32 4 8.00% 88.00%
33 3 6.00% 94.00%
34 0 0.00% 94.00%
35 2 4.00% 98.00%
36 1 2.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Rodolfo and Allen
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 28.2
Sample Variance: 13.56
No. 119
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 82.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.7
Variance of the Mean: 0.2712
85th Percentile Speed: 32
90th Percentile Speed: 33
Vehicles in Pace: 41
50th Percentile Speed: 28
95th Percentile Speed: 35
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Terven Avenue Comments:
Between: Sanborn Road & Airport Boulevard
Survey Location: 1061 Terven Avenue
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/04/26 Monday
1:36 2:15
862
Direction: EBD/WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 2 2.00% 2.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
22 3 3.00% 5.00% MPH
23 3 3.00% 8.00%
24 6 6.00% 14.00%
25 5 5.00% 19.00%
26 11 11.00% 30.00%
27 9 9.00% 39.00%
28 9 9.00% 48.00%
29 13 13.00% 61.00%
30 7 7.00% 68.00%
31 7 7.00% 75.00%
32 13 13.00% 88.00%
33 4 4.00% 92.00%
34 1 1.00% 93.00%
35 3 3.00% 96.00%
36 1 1.00% 97.00%
37 2 2.00% 99.00%
38 1 1.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Rodolfo and Allen
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 28.6
Sample Variance: 13.99
Weather: Clear
95th Percentile Speed: 35
85th Percentile Speed: 32
90th Percentile Speed: 33
Vehicles in Pace: 84
50th Percentile Speed: 29
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 84.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.7
Variance of the Mean: 0.1399
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Terven Avenue Comments:
Between: Sanborn Road & Airport Boulevard No. 119
Survey Location: 1061 Terven Avenue
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/04/26 Monday
1:36 2:15
863
864
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 1,050 Feet Flat 62 Feet 4-Lane Collector 17,697 2 Collisions (2024-2025)0.77 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH 34 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: HANSEN STREET AIRPORT BLVD & HARKINS RD 04/22/2031 (EXPIRES 2031) 120 This segment of Hansen Street is classified as a collector street in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes commercial use. Speed data collected on April 22, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 34 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 25 mph to 34 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up, and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTIONHANSEN ST
AIRPORT BLVD
HARKINS RD SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFES IONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(120) Hansen St btwn Airport & Harkins.dwg 865
Direction: EBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 3 6.00% 6.00%
26 0 0.00% 6.00%
27 4 8.00% 14.00%
28 3 6.00% 20.00%
29 1 2.00% 22.00%
30 5 10.00% 32.00%
31 8 16.00% 48.00%
32 2 4.00% 52.00%
33 2 4.00% 56.00%
34 9 18.00% 74.00%
35 5 10.00% 84.00%
36 1 2.00% 86.00%
37 5 10.00% 96.00%
38 0 0.00% 96.00%
39 2 4.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Eva & Rodolfo
Hansen Street Comments:
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
41 32
Vehicles in Pace:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.7 0.2668
82.0%
37 36
Standard Deviation:
No. 120
37 32.1
13.34 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Wednesday
2:41
04/22/26
3:10
Airport Boulevard & Harkins Road
1250 Hansen Street
866
Direction: WBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 To: 32 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 5 10.00% 10.00%
24 0 0.00% 10.00%
25 7 14.00% 24.00%
26 5 10.00% 34.00%
27 2 4.00% 38.00%
28 5 10.00% 48.00%
29 7 14.00% 62.00%
30 9 18.00% 80.00%
31 3 6.00% 86.00%
32 3 6.00% 92.00%
33 1 2.00% 94.00%
34 3 6.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 32
Vehicles in Pace: 46
50th Percentile Speed: 29
95th Percentile Speed: 34
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 92.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.1
Variance of the Mean: 0.1872
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 28.2
Sample Variance: 9.36
No. 120
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Eva & Rodolfo
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Hansen Street
Between: Airport Boulevard & Harkins Road
Survey Location: 1250 Hansen Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/22/26 Wednesday
2:41 3:10
867
Direction: EBD/WBD
30 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 25 To: 34 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 5 5.00% 5.00%
24 0 0.00% 5.00%
25 10 10.00% 15.00%
26 5 5.00% 20.00%
27 6 6.00% 26.00%
28 8 8.00% 34.00%
29 8 8.00% 42.00%
30 14 14.00% 56.00%
31 11 11.00% 67.00%
32 5 5.00% 72.00%
33 3 3.00% 75.00%
34 12 12.00% 87.00%
35 5 5.00% 92.00%
36 1 1.00% 93.00%
37 5 5.00% 98.00%
38 0 0.00% 98.00%
39 2 2.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 37
Hansen Street
85th Percentile Speed: 34
90th Percentile Speed: 35
Vehicles in Pace: 82
50th Percentile Speed: 30
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 82.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.9
Variance of the Mean: 0.1500
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 30.2
Sample Variance: 15.00
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Eva & Rodolfo
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Comments:
Between: Airport Boulevard & Harkins Road No. 120
Survey Location: 1250 Hansen Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/22/26 Wednesday
2:41 3:10
868
869
STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 5,150 Feet Flat Varies (60 to 84 Feet)2-Lane Major Arterial 19,138 28 Collisions (2024-2025)2.07 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH 38 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: JOHN STREET WOOD ST & E ALISAL ST 04/14/26 (EXPIRES IN 2031) 122 This segment of John Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes schools and residential homes. Speed data collected on April 14, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 38 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 29 mph to 38 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph, and the presence of pedestrian/bicyclist infrastructure allowing for an additional 5 mph reduction under AB 43, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph. DESCRIPTION S HEBBRON AVE US HWY 101 WOOD ST S FILICE ST JOHN ST S SANBORN RD E ALISAL ST SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFES IONAL ENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(122) John St btwn Wood & E Alisal.dwg SHASTA WY MAGNOLIA DR TULIP CIR MARIGOLD WY 25 MPH SCHOOL ZONE 25 MPH SCHOOL ZONE MCGOWAN DR 870
Direction: WBD
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 29 To: 38 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00%
28 1 2.00% 2.00%
29 2 4.00% 6.00%
30 2 4.00% 10.00%
31 4 8.00% 18.00%
32 3 6.00% 24.00%
33 4 8.00% 32.00%
34 5 10.00% 42.00%
35 8 16.00% 58.00%
36 6 12.00% 70.00%
37 5 10.00% 80.00%
38 4 8.00% 88.00%
39 1 2.00% 90.00%
40 2 4.00% 94.00%
41 2 4.00% 98.00%
42 0 0.00% 98.00%
43 1 2.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.5 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Joaquin R
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
43 35
Vehicles in Pace:
04/14/26
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.3 0.2230
86.0%
41 38
Standard Deviation:
No. 122
39 34.9
11.15 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
35 MPH
Day: Tuesday
3:07 3:34
John Street Comments:
Wood Street & E Alisal Street
1077 John Street
871
Direction: EBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 1 2.00% 2.00%
27 1 2.00% 4.00%
28 2 4.00% 8.00%
29 2 4.00% 12.00%
30 3 6.00% 18.00%
31 5 10.00% 28.00%
32 6 12.00% 40.00%
33 7 14.00% 54.00%
34 4 8.00% 62.00%
35 3 6.00% 68.00%
36 6 12.00% 80.00%
37 4 8.00% 88.00%
38 1 2.00% 90.00%
39 2 4.00% 94.00%
40 2 4.00% 98.00%
41 0 0.00% 98.00%
42 0 0.00% 98.00%
43 0 0.00% 98.00%
44 0 0.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 0 0.00% 98.00%
48 0 0.00% 98.00%
49 0 0.00% 98.00%
50 0 0.00% 98.00%
51 1 2.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 37
90th Percentile Speed: 38
Vehicles in Pace: 42
50th Percentile Speed: 33
95th Percentile Speed: 40
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 84.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.3452
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 33.7
Sample Variance: 17.26
No. 122
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Joaquin R
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: John Street Comments:
Between: Wood Street & E Alisal Street
Survey Location: 1077 John Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/14/26 Tuesday
3:07 3:34
872
Direction: WBD/EBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 29 To: 38 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 1 1.00% 1.00%
27 1 1.00% 2.00%
28 3 3.00% 5.00%
29 4 4.00% 9.00%
30 5 5.00% 14.00%
31 9 9.00% 23.00%
32 9 9.00% 32.00%
33 11 11.00% 43.00%
34 9 9.00% 52.00%
35 11 11.00% 63.00%
36 12 12.00% 75.00%
37 9 9.00% 84.00%
38 5 5.00% 89.00%
39 3 3.00% 92.00%
40 4 4.00% 96.00%
41 2 2.00% 98.00%
42 0 0.00% 98.00%
43 1 1.00% 99.00%
44 0 0.00% 99.00%
45 0 0.00% 99.00%
46 0 0.00% 99.00%
47 0 0.00% 99.00%
48 0 0.00% 99.00%
49 0 0.00% 99.00%
50 0 0.00% 99.00%
51 1 1.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 40
85th Percentile Speed: 38
90th Percentile Speed: 39
Vehicles in Pace: 84
50th Percentile Speed: 34
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.4
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 84.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.1440
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 34.3
Sample Variance: 14.40
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Joaquin R
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: John Street Comments:
Between: Wood Street & E Alisal Street No. 122
Survey Location: 1077 John Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/14/26 Tuesday
3:07 3:34
873
874
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,400 Feet Flat Varies (32 to 82 Feet) 4-Lane Collector 2,022 0 Collisions (2024-2025)0.00 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH 38 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: FREEDOM PARKWAY WILLIAMS RD & SCONBERG PKWY 05/05/26 (EXPIRES 2031) 123 This segment of Freedom Parkway is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes backing residential homes, schools, and a park. Speed data collected on April 23, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 38 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 28 mph to 37 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph, and the presence of pedestrian/bicyclist infrastructure allowing for an additional 5 mph reduction under AB 43, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be reduced to 30 mph. DESCRIPTION FREEDOM PKWY
TUSCANY BLVD
WILLIAMS RDMONTE BELLA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PADOVA DR
SCONBERG PKWY SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFES IONAL ENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(123) Freedom Pkwy btwn Williams & Sconberg.dwg 25 MPH SCHOOL ZONE 25 MPH SCHOOL ZONE 875
Direction: NBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 25 To: 34 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 2.00%
24 1 2.00% 4.00%
25 2 4.00% 8.00%
26 2 4.00% 12.00%
27 0 0.00% 12.00%
28 5 10.00% 22.00%
29 6 12.00% 34.00%
30 6 12.00% 46.00%
31 3 6.00% 52.00%
32 4 8.00% 60.00%
33 4 8.00% 68.00%
34 6 12.00% 80.00%
35 1 2.00% 82.00%
36 1 2.00% 84.00%
37 1 2.00% 86.00%
38 2 4.00% 90.00%
39 2 4.00% 94.00%
40 2 4.00% 98.00%
41 0 0.00% 98.00%
42 1 2.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.6 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Enrique
Freedom Parkway Comments:
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
38 31
Vehicles in Pace:
04/23/26
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
4.4 0.3940
76.0%
40 37
Standard Deviation:
No. 123
38 31.7
19.70 Variance of the Mean:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Williams Road & Sconberg Parkway
Behind 1326 Cassino Way
Thursday
2:46 3:20
876
Direction: SBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 31 To: 40 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 1 2.00% 2.00%
25 0 0.00% 2.00%
26 1 2.00% 4.00%
27 1 2.00% 6.00%
28 2 4.00% 10.00%
29 3 6.00% 16.00%
30 2 4.00% 20.00%
31 2 4.00% 24.00%
32 3 6.00% 30.00%
33 6 12.00% 42.00%
34 5 10.00% 52.00%
35 2 4.00% 56.00%
36 4 8.00% 64.00%
37 5 10.00% 74.00%
38 3 6.00% 80.00%
39 4 8.00% 88.00%
40 4 8.00% 96.00%
41 2 4.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
85th Percentile Speed: 39
90th Percentile Speed: 40
Vehicles in Pace: 38
50th Percentile Speed: 34
95th Percentile Speed: 40
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 76.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.2
Variance of the Mean: 0.3572
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 34.3
Sample Variance: 17.86
No. 123
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Enrique
Street: Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Freedom Parkway
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Between: Williams Road & Sconberg Parkway
Survey Location: Behind 1326 Cassino Way
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/23/26 Thursday
2:46 3:20
877
Direction: NBD/SBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 28 To: 37 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 1 1.00% 1.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 1.00%
24 2 2.00% 3.00%
25 2 2.00% 5.00%
26 3 3.00% 8.00%
27 1 1.00% 9.00%
28 7 7.00% 16.00%
29 9 9.00% 25.00%
30 8 8.00% 33.00%
31 5 5.00% 38.00%
32 7 7.00% 45.00%
33 10 10.00% 55.00%
34 11 11.00% 66.00%
35 3 3.00% 69.00%
36 5 5.00% 74.00%
37 6 6.00% 80.00%
38 5 5.00% 85.00%
39 6 6.00% 91.00%
40 6 6.00% 97.00%
41 2 2.00% 99.00%
42 1 1.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
95th Percentile Speed: 40
Freedom Parkway
85th Percentile Speed: 38
90th Percentile Speed: 39
Vehicles in Pace: 71
50th Percentile Speed: 33
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 71.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.5
Variance of the Mean: 0.2040
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 33.0
Sample Variance: 20.40
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Enrique
No. 123
Survey Location: Behind 1326 Cassino Way
Speed Limit:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Comments:
Between: Williams Road & Sconberg Parkway
Date: 04/23/26 Thursday
2:46 3:20
878
879
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,550 Feet Flat 32 Feet 2-Lane Collector 4,902 0 Collisions (2024-2025) 0.00 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone85th Percentile Speed 35 MPH 43 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: SCONBERG PARKWAY ALISAL RD & FREEDOM PKWY 05/05/2026 (EXPIRES IN 2031) 124 This segment of Sconberg Parkway between Alisal Road and Freedom Parkway is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes a school, backing residential homes, and agricultural use. Speed data collected on May 5, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 43 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 34 mph to 43 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph, and the presence of pedestrian/bicyclist infrastructure allowing for an additional 5 mph reduction under AB 43, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be increased to 35 mph. DESCRIPTION
FREEDOM PKWY SCONBERG PKWY
ALISAL RD BARDIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MONTE BELLA BLVD
PAVIA WY SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(124) Sconberg Pkwy btwn Alisal & Freedom.dwg 880
Direction: EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 34 To: 43 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 1 2.00% 2.00%
27 0 0.00% 2.00%
28 3 6.00% 8.00%
29 0 0.00% 8.00%
30 1 2.00% 10.00%
31 3 6.00% 16.00%
32 1 2.00% 18.00%
33 1 2.00% 20.00%
34 4 8.00% 28.00%
35 2 4.00% 32.00%
36 5 10.00% 42.00%
37 4 8.00% 50.00%
38 1 2.00% 52.00%
39 2 4.00% 56.00%
40 5 10.00% 66.00%
41 4 8.00% 74.00%
42 3 6.00% 80.00%
43 2 4.00% 84.00%
44 0 0.00% 84.00%
45 2 4.00% 88.00%
46 1 2.00% 90.00%
47 2 4.00% 94.00%
48 2 4.00% 98.00%
49 1 2.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
5.8 0.6624
64.0%
48 45
Standard Deviation:
No. 124
46 38.0
33.12 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
32 37
Vehicles in Pace:
05/05/26
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.8 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Allen
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Alisal Road & Freedom Parkway
Behind 1232 Palermo Court
Tuesday
1:42 2:15
Sconberg Parkway Comments:
881
Direction: WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 33 To: 42 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 1 2.00% 2.00%
26 0 0.00% 2.00%
27 1 2.00% 4.00%
28 1 2.00% 6.00%
29 0 0.00% 6.00%
30 3 6.00% 12.00%
31 1 2.00% 14.00%
32 2 4.00% 18.00%
33 2 4.00% 22.00%
34 2 4.00% 26.00%
35 5 10.00% 36.00%
36 3 6.00% 42.00%
37 5 10.00% 52.00%
38 4 8.00% 60.00%
39 3 6.00% 66.00%
40 3 6.00% 72.00%
41 3 6.00% 78.00%
42 5 10.00% 88.00%
43 2 4.00% 92.00%
44 2 4.00% 96.00%
45 1 2.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 1 2.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Allen
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 37.1
Sample Variance: 24.09
No. 124
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.7
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 70.0%
Standard Deviation: 4.9
Variance of the Mean: 0.4818
85th Percentile Speed: 42
90th Percentile Speed: 43
Vehicles in Pace: 35
50th Percentile Speed: 37
95th Percentile Speed: 44
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Sconberg Parkway Comments:
Between: Alisal Road & Freedom Parkway
Survey Location: Behind 1232 Palermo Court
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/05/26 Tuesday
1:42 2:15
882
Direction: EBD/WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 34 To: 43 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 1 1.00% 1.00%
26 1 1.00% 2.00%
27 1 1.00% 3.00%
28 4 4.00% 7.00%
29 0 0.00% 7.00%
30 4 4.00% 11.00%
31 4 4.00% 15.00%
32 3 3.00% 18.00%
33 3 3.00% 21.00%
34 6 6.00% 27.00%
35 7 7.00% 34.00%
36 8 8.00% 42.00%
37 9 9.00% 51.00%
38 5 5.00% 56.00%
39 5 5.00% 61.00%
40 8 8.00% 69.00%
41 7 7.00% 76.00%
42 8 8.00% 84.00%
43 4 4.00% 88.00%
44 2 2.00% 90.00%
45 3 3.00% 93.00%
46 1 1.00% 94.00%
47 3 3.00% 97.00%
48 2 2.00% 99.00%
49 1 1.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Allen
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 37.5
Sample Variance: 28.51
Street: Comments:
Between: Alisal Road & Freedom Parkway
Weather: Clear
95th Percentile Speed: 47
85th Percentile Speed: 43
90th Percentile Speed: 44
Vehicles in Pace: 67
50th Percentile Speed: 37
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 67.0%
Standard Deviation: 5.3
Variance of the Mean: 0.2851
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Sconberg Parkway
No. 124
Survey Location: Behind 1232 Palermo Court
Speed Limit:
Date: 05/05/26 Tuesday
1:42 2:15
883
884
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,860 Feet Flat 86 Feet 4-Lane Major Arterial 27,107 8 Collisions (2024-2025)0.55 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone85t Percentile Speed 35 MPH 39 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: NORTH DAVIS ROAD LARKIN ST & WESTRIDGE PKWY 04/17/2026 (EXPIRES 2031) 125 This segment of North Davis Road is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes school and retail. Speed data collected on April 17, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 39 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 27 mph to 36 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is above this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded up and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 2, the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION N DAVIS RD W LAUREL DR
LARKIN ST
WESTRIDGE
PKWY
N DAVIS RD SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(125) N Davis Rd btwn Larkin & Westridge.dwg 885
Direction: NBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 31 To: 40 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 1 2.00% 2.00%
27 1 2.00% 4.00%
28 2 4.00% 8.00%
29 1 2.00% 10.00%
30 4 8.00% 18.00%
31 3 6.00% 24.00%
32 4 8.00% 32.00%
33 3 6.00% 38.00%
34 5 10.00% 48.00%
35 2 4.00% 52.00%
36 6 12.00% 64.00%
37 1 2.00% 66.00%
38 5 10.00% 76.00%
39 2 4.00% 80.00%
40 5 10.00% 90.00%
41 1 2.00% 92.00%
42 0 0.00% 92.00%
43 0 0.00% 92.00%
44 2 4.00% 96.00%
45 1 2.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 0 0.00% 98.00%
48 1 2.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
4.9 0.4720
72.0%
44 40
Standard Deviation:
No. 125
40 35.2
23.60 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
36 35
Vehicles in Pace:
01:45
04/17/26
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Clear
0.7 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Alejandro M
01:15
Friday
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
N Davis Road Comments:
Larkin Street & Westridge Parkway
1250 N Davis Road
886
Direction: SBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 27 To: 36 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 2 4.00% 4.00% MPH
23 3 6.00% 10.00%
24 3 6.00% 16.00%
25 1 2.00% 18.00%
26 1 2.00% 20.00%
27 2 4.00% 24.00%
28 5 10.00% 34.00%
29 4 8.00% 42.00%
30 1 2.00% 44.00%
31 6 12.00% 56.00%
32 4 8.00% 64.00%
33 2 4.00% 68.00%
34 5 10.00% 78.00%
35 4 8.00% 86.00%
36 2 4.00% 90.00%
37 0 0.00% 90.00%
38 1 2.00% 92.00%
39 2 4.00% 96.00%
40 1 2.00% 98.00%
41 0 0.00% 98.00%
42 0 0.00% 98.00%
43 0 0.00% 98.00%
44 0 0.00% 98.00%
45 0 0.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 0 0.00% 98.00%
48 0 0.00% 98.00%
49 0 0.00% 98.00%
50 0 0.00% 98.00%
51 0 0.00% 98.00%
52 1 2.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Weather: Clear
Observer(s): Alejandro M
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 30.9
Sample Variance: 31.14
No. 125
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.8
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 70.0%
Standard Deviation: 5.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.6228
85th Percentile Speed: 35
90th Percentile Speed: 37
Vehicles in Pace: 35
50th Percentile Speed: 31
95th Percentile Speed: 39
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: N Davis Road Comments:
Between: Larkin Street & Westrridge Parkway
Survey Location: 1250 N Davis Road
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/17/26 Friday
1:15 1:45
887
Direction: NBD/SBD
35 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 27 To: 36 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 2 2.00% 2.00% MPH
23 3 3.00% 5.00%
24 3 3.00% 8.00%
25 1 1.00% 9.00%
26 2 2.00% 11.00%
27 3 3.00% 14.00%
28 7 7.00% 21.00%
29 5 5.00% 26.00%
30 5 5.00% 31.00%
31 9 9.00% 40.00%
32 8 8.00% 48.00%
33 5 5.00% 53.00%
34 10 10.00% 63.00%
35 6 6.00% 69.00%
36 8 8.00% 77.00%
37 1 1.00% 78.00%
38 6 6.00% 84.00%
39 4 4.00% 88.00%
40 6 6.00% 94.00%
41 1 1.00% 95.00%
42 0 0.00% 95.00%
43 0 0.00% 95.00%
44 2 2.00% 97.00%
45 1 1.00% 98.00%
46 0 0.00% 98.00%
47 0 0.00% 98.00%
48 1 1.00% 99.00%
49 0 0.00% 99.00%
50 0 0.00% 99.00%
51 0 0.00% 99.00%
52 1 1.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Alejandro M
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 33.1
Sample Variance: 31.76
Weather: Clear
95th Percentile Speed: 43
85th Percentile Speed: 39
90th Percentile Speed: 40
Vehicles in Pace: 66
50th Percentile Speed: 33
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.6
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 66.0%
Standard Deviation: 5.6
Variance of the Mean: 0.3176
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: N Davis Road Comments:
Between: Larkin Street & Westrridge Parkway No. 125
Survey Location: 1250 N Davis Road
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/17/26 Friday
1:15 1:45
888
889
CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 3,300 Feet Flat 64 Feet 2-Lane Major Arterial 12,442 16 Collisions (2024-2025)2.84 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 30 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: ALISAL STREET CAPITOL ST & FRONT ST 04/15/2026 (EXPIRES 2031) 126 This segment of Alisal Street is classified as a major arterial in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes retail and commercial. Speed data collected on April 15, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 30 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION
CHURCH ST
LINCOLN AVE
SALINAS ST
MAIN ST
MONTEREY ST
PAJARO ST
FRONT ST
SOLEDAD ST
CALIFORNIA ST
CAYUGA ST E ALISAL ST
CAPITOL ST W ALISAL ST SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFES IONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(126) Alisal St btwn Capitol & Front.dwg 890
Direction: WBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 22 To: 31 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
23 1 2.00% 4.00%
24 3 6.00% 10.00%
25 2 4.00% 14.00%
26 5 10.00% 24.00%
27 5 10.00% 34.00%
28 6 12.00% 46.00%
29 11 22.00% 68.00%
30 9 18.00% 86.00%
31 3 6.00% 92.00%
32 0 0.00% 92.00%
33 2 4.00% 96.00%
34 0 0.00% 96.00%
35 1 2.00% 98.00%
36 0 0.00% 98.00%
37 0 0.00% 98.00%
38 0 0.00% 98.00%
39 0 0.00% 98.00%
40 1 2.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
3.1 0.1872
92.0%
33 30
Standard Deviation:
No. 126
31 28.5
9.36 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
46 29
Vehicles in Pace:
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.4 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo C
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Alisal Street Comments:
Capitol Street & Front Street
127 E Alisal Street
Wednesday
1:20
04/15/26
2:04
891
Direction: EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 3 6.00% 6.00%
25 7 14.00% 20.00%
26 6 12.00% 32.00%
27 6 12.00% 44.00%
28 9 18.00% 62.00%
29 9 18.00% 80.00%
30 4 8.00% 88.00%
31 2 4.00% 92.00%
32 2 4.00% 96.00%
33 2 4.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 27.8
Sample Variance: 5.39
No. 126
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 100.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.3
Variance of the Mean: 0.1078
85th Percentile Speed: 30
90th Percentile Speed: 31
Vehicles in Pace: 50
50th Percentile Speed: 28
95th Percentile Speed: 32
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
1:20 2:04
Street: Alisal Street Comments:
Between: Capitol Street & Front Street
Survey Location: 127 E Alisal Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/15/26 Wednesday
892
Direction: WBD/EBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
22 1 1.00% 1.00% MPH
23 1 1.00% 2.00%
24 6 6.00% 8.00%
25 9 9.00% 17.00%
26 11 11.00% 28.00%
27 11 11.00% 39.00%
28 15 15.00% 54.00%
29 20 20.00% 74.00%
30 13 13.00% 87.00%
31 5 5.00% 92.00%
32 2 2.00% 94.00%
33 4 4.00% 98.00%
34 0 0.00% 98.00%
35 1 1.00% 99.00%
36 0 0.00% 99.00%
37 0 0.00% 99.00%
38 0 0.00% 99.00%
39 0 0.00% 99.00%
40 1 1.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Rodolfo C
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 28.1
Sample Variance: 7.41
Weather: Sunny
95th Percentile Speed: 33
85th Percentile Speed: 30
90th Percentile Speed: 31
Vehicles in Pace: 96
50th Percentile Speed: 28
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 96.0%
Standard Deviation: 2.7
Variance of the Mean: 0.0741
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Comments:
Between: Capitol Street & Front Street
Alisal Street
No. 126
Survey Location: 127 E Alisal Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/15/26 Wednesday
1:20 2:04
893
894
ALMA AVE STOP STOP STOP STOP CITY OF SALINAS TRANSPORTATION & ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SURVEY MAP SYMBOL Distance Vertical Alignment Street Width No. Lanes and Median Traffic Volume (Date) Accident Data (2 years)
Street Segment Collision Rate = (Collisions) (1,000,000) (Years) (365) (ADT) (Length in Miles)
Approximately 4,350 Feet Flat Varies (38 to 44 Feet) 2-Lane Collector 3,653 16 Collisions (2024-2025)7.32 Acc./MVM Proposed Speed Zone 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 31 MPH AREA COMMENTS: STREET: BETWEEN: SURVEY DATE: TOWT STREET GARNER AVE & FREEDOM PKWY 04/29/2026 (EXPIRES 2031) 127 This segment of Towt Street is classified as a collector in the City of Salinas General Plan. The surrounding land use includes residential homes and a school. Speed data collected on April 29, 2026, revealed the 85th percentile speed of 31 mph. The 10 mph pace ranges from 24 mph to 33 mph and suggests the 85th percentile speed is within this range. Based on the surrounding land use, the 10 mph pace range, and the prevailing speeds rounded down and reduced by 5 mph per MUTCD option 1, the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph should be retained. DESCRIPTION TOWT ST CESAR E CHAVEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
GARNER AVE
DEL MONTE AVE FREEDOM PKWY
CORTEZ ST
MAE AVE
PASEO GRANDE SPEED LIMIT SIGN SIGNAL CITY LIMITS SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STOP ALL-WAY STOP REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIV IL NO. 69142 ADRIANAROBLES I:\PWTra\Radar Survey\Radar Surveys EXP 2031\Aerials\(127) Towt St btwn Garner & Freedom.dwg 895
Direction: NBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
21 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
22 1 2.00% 4.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 4.00%
24 4 8.00% 12.00%
25 3 6.00% 18.00%
26 7 14.00% 32.00%
27 4 8.00% 40.00%
28 7 14.00% 54.00%
29 7 14.00% 68.00%
30 7 14.00% 82.00%
31 4 8.00% 90.00%
32 2 4.00% 94.00%
33 3 6.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
2.8 0.1576
96.0%
33 31
Standard Deviation:
No. 127
31 28.0
7.88 Variance of the Mean:
Speed Limit:
Date:
CITY OF SALINAS
48 28
Vehicles in Pace:
04/29/26
Street:
Between:
Survey Location:
Data Analysis:
Sunny
0.4 10 MPH Pace:
Weather:
Observer(s):
Time Mean Speed:
Sample Variance:
Rodolfo
Standard Error of the Mean:
Percent in Pace:
95th Percentile Speed:
50th Percentile Speed:
85th Percentile Speed:
90th Percentile Speed:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Towt Street Comments:
Garner Avenue & Freedom Parkway
546 Towt Street
Wednesday
1:35 2:05
896
Direction: SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 22 To: 31 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 1 2.00% 2.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
21 0 0.00% 2.00% MPH
22 3 6.00% 8.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 8.00%
24 3 6.00% 14.00%
25 6 12.00% 26.00%
26 5 10.00% 36.00%
27 5 10.00% 46.00%
28 6 12.00% 58.00%
29 4 8.00% 66.00%
30 5 10.00% 76.00%
31 5 10.00% 86.00%
32 1 2.00% 88.00%
33 1 2.00% 90.00%
34 1 2.00% 92.00%
35 2 4.00% 96.00%
36 1 2.00% 98.00%
37 1 2.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 50 100.00%
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Weather: Sunny
Observer(s): Rodolfo
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 28.1
Sample Variance: 14.38
No. 127
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.5
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 84.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.8
Variance of the Mean: 0.2876
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 33
Vehicles in Pace: 42
50th Percentile Speed: 28
95th Percentile Speed: 35
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Towt Street Comments:
Between: Garner Avenue & Freedom Parkway
Survey Location: 546 Towt Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/29/26 Wednesday
1:35 2:05
897
Direction: NBD/SBD
25 MPH
Day:
Hours: From: To:
MPH Frequency Percent Cumulative
%
10 0 0.00% 0.00%
11 0 0.00% 0.00% MPH
12 0 0.00% 0.00%
13 0 0.00% 0.00%
14 0 0.00% 0.00%
15 0 0.00% 0.00%
16 0 0.00% 0.00% 24 To: 33 MPH
17 0 0.00% 0.00%
18 0 0.00% 0.00%
19 1 1.00% 1.00% MPH
20 0 0.00% 1.00% MPH
21 1 1.00% 2.00% MPH
22 4 4.00% 6.00% MPH
23 0 0.00% 6.00%
24 7 7.00% 13.00%
25 9 9.00% 22.00%
26 12 12.00% 34.00%
27 9 9.00% 43.00%
28 13 13.00% 56.00%
29 11 11.00% 67.00%
30 12 12.00% 79.00%
31 9 9.00% 88.00%
32 3 3.00% 91.00%
33 4 4.00% 95.00%
34 1 1.00% 96.00%
35 2 2.00% 98.00%
36 1 1.00% 99.00%
37 1 1.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
Totals: 100 100.00%
Observer(s): Rodolfo
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT &
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RADAR SURVEY
CITY OF SALINAS
Data Analysis:
Time Mean Speed: 28.0
Sample Variance: 11.02
Weather: Sunny
95th Percentile Speed: 33
85th Percentile Speed: 31
90th Percentile Speed: 32
Vehicles in Pace: 89
50th Percentile Speed: 28
Standard Error of the Mean: 0.3
10 MPH Pace:
Percent in Pace: 89.0%
Standard Deviation: 3.3
Variance of the Mean: 0.1102
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed MPH
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Frequency
Spot Speed, MPH
Frequency Distribution
Street: Towt Street Comments:
Between: Garner Avenue & Freedom Parkway No. 127
Survey Location: 546 Towt Street
Speed Limit:
Date: 04/29/26 Wednesday
1:35 2:05
898
899
SEE MAP 6N44
SEE MAP 6P14
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Salinas
MONTEREY
·|}þ183
·|}þ68
·|}þ183
SALINAS
SANTA RITA
BOLSA KNOLLS
E Alisal St
E Alvin Dr
Market Way
John St
Williams Rd
W Alisal St
W Rossi St
N
Main St
N Sanborn Rd
Pajaro
St
Work St
Boronda
Rd
Constitution Blvd
E Laurel Dr
Riker St
Lincoln Ave
E Bernal Dr
Abbott St
Cll del Adobe
Post Dr
E Rossi St
Main St
Constitution Blvd
·|}þ183
·|}þ ·|}þ68 183
·|}þ183
£¤101
£¤101
N
Main St
E Boronda Rd
E Laurel Dr
N
Davis
Rd
Natividad Rd
S Davis
Rd
E Alisal St
Davis Rd
Sherwood
Dr
W Laurel Dr
Salinas St
Monterey
St
Market Way
N Sanborn
Rd
Boronda Rd
W Laurel Dr
N
Sanborn Rd
Towt St
San
Juan
Grade
Rd
Rider Ave
Blanco Rd
Central Ave
Chaparral St
Russell Rd
Garner Ave
Harden Pkwy
W Acacia St
Larkin Dr
del Monte Ave
Navajo Dr
el Dorado
Dr
Villa St
Iris Dr
Rico
St
Bardin Rd
Clay St
Independence
Blvd
McKinnon St
Linwood
Dr
Freedom Pkwy
Nantucket Blvd
Maryal Dr
Maple St
Tyler St
Casentini St
Beacon
Hill Dr
W Alvin Dr
Skyway Blvd
Adams St
Arcadia Way
Iverson
St
S
Hebbron Ave
Arcadia St
Espinosa Rd
Old
Stage
Rd
Date: 3/30/16
S
E
E
M
A
P
6 N
5 3
S
E
E
M
A
P
6 N
5 5
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz
CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
A B C D E F G H J K
A B C D E F G H J K
MAP 6N54
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES
COUNTY BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
SIGN ROUTES
INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ1 STATE
§¨¦5
900
SEE MAP 6N54
SEE MAP 6P24
!(
!(
MONTEREY
·|}þ68
AbbottSt
RomieLn
PajaroSt
RikerSt
WorkSt
HarrisRd
AlisalSt
Salinas
Salinas
£¤101
County Hwy G17
HarkinsRd
HarrisRd
SpreckelsBlvd
AbbottSt
IversonSt
Los PalosDr
AcaciaSt
San MiguelAve
TervenAve
HattonAve
AirportBlvd
HansenSt
HarrisCt
San JoaquinSt
HarrisRd
SALINAS MUNI
SPRECKELS
£¤101
US
Hwy 101El Camino Real
US
Hwy 101El Camino
Real
BlancoRd
State Hwy 68Monterey SalinasHwy
SanbornRd
Ramp
State
Hwy
68SMainSt
Ramp
Ramp
AbbottSt
RomieLn
PajaroSt
WorkSt
RikerSt
HarkinsRd
HarrisRd
County Hwy G17RiverRd
SpreckelsBlvd
AbbottSt
IversonS t
County Hwy G17ReservationRd
PortolaDr
PortolaDr PortolaDr
BlancoRd
SanbornRd
Ramp
Date 8/5/11
S
E
E
M
A
P
6 P
1 3
S
E
E
M
A
P
6 P
1 5
Monterey
San Benito Santa Cruz
CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
A B C D E F G H J K
A B C D E F G H J K
MAP 6P14
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SIGN ROUTES
INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
STATE
4567
D2 COUNTY
|ÿ1
§¨¦5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES
COUNTY BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
901
SEE MAP 6N45
SEE MAP 6P15
!(
MONTEREY
Williams Rd
N Sanborn Rd
Salinas
Old Stage Rd
Williams Rd
Alisal Rd
Freedom
Pkwy
Old
StageRd
Old
StageRd
BorondaRd
Old StageRd
WilliamsRd
Old
StageRd
E Boronda Rd
Date 8/5/11
S
E
E
M
A
P
6 N
5 4
S
E
E
M
A
P
7 N
Monterey
San Benito
Santa Cruz
CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
A B C D E F G H J K
A B C D E F G H J K
MAP 6N55
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
LOCAL
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY
INTERSTATE 1
3 4
5 7
2 MINOR COLLECTOR 6
Monterey
Mile
Feet
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SIGN ROUTES
INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
STATE
4567
D2 COUNTY
|ÿ1
§¨¦5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES
COUNTY BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
902
903
904
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.salinas.gov
File #: ID#26-264, Version: 1
Award Design of Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 2 (CIP 9510) to Wallace Group Approve a Resolution awarding a contract to Wallace Group for the design and related services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 2 (CIP 9510) in an amount not to exceed $4,285,958; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and/or modifications to the Agreement.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 6/13/2026
powered by Legistar™905
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 16, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, DIRECTOR
BY: JOSIE LANTACA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
ADRIANA ROBLES, PE, CFM, CITY ENGINEER
TITLE: AWARD DESIGN OF BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF
PROJECT PHASE 2 (CIP 9510) TO WALLACE GROUP
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a Resolution:
1. Awarding a contract to Wallace Group for the design and related services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 2 (CIP 9510) in an amount not to exceed $4,285,958; and
2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and/or modifications to the Agreement.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project (Project) proposes to widen East Boronda Road into a four-lane roadway (two-lanes in each direction) between Dartmouth Way and Independence Boulevard, and to construct roundabouts at McKinnon Street, El Dorado Drive, Natividad Road, and Independence Boulevard. The Project will be built in phases to accommodate funding availability.
Phase 1 of the Project is constructing the McKinnon roundabout with the associated improvements.
Construction began in November 2024 and is currently scheduled to be completed in fall 2026.
A request for qualifications (RFQ) to provide professional engineering design services for the design of the Phase 2 Project was advertised, and a submittal from Wallace Group was received in response to the RFQ. Staff recommend approving a Professional Services Agreement with Wallace Group to provide professional engineering design services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 2 for a total amount not to exceed $4,285,958.
BACKGROUND:
The Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project proposes to widen East Boronda Road into a fourlane roadway (two-lanes in each direction) between Dartmouth Way and Independence Boulevard, 906
Page | 2
and to construct roundabouts at McKinnon Street, El Dorado Drive, Natividad Road, and Independence Boulevard. In May 2017, City Council approved the roundabout concept at the intersections identified above along with Hemingway Drive (Resolution No. 21169). The project includes the construction of bioretention facilities, buffered bike lanes, bus pullouts, sidewalks, ADA-compliant access ramps, storm drain lines, sanitary sewer lines, street lighting, landscaping, and other improvements. Project limits are from just east of Dartmouth Way to a point east of Independence Boulevard. The Project will be built in phases to accommodate funding availability and environmental clearances.
Phase 1 of the Project is constructing the McKinnon roundabout with the associated improvements and was awarded to Granite Construction Company on August 6, 2024 (Resolution No. 23053).
Construction started on November 12, 2024, and is currently scheduled to be completed in fall 2026
A request for qualifications (RFQ) to provide professional engineering design services for the Phase 2 project was advertised in December 2025 to January 2026, and a submittal from Wallace Group was received in response to the RFQ. No other submittals were received.
Wallace Group shall provide all services to complete the detailed design including plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) phase for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase
2. The Phase 2 Project will be designed and constructed as two stand-alone projects (Phase 2A – El Dorado Roundabout, and Phase 2B – Natividad Roundabout) to accommodate funding availability. Wallace Group shall also provide support during construction to respond to design related requests for information and material submittals. Wallace Group is partnering with Kimley–Horn, Earth Systems Pacific, and EMC Planning to provide the required services.
Wallace Group provided professional engineering design services for the Phase 1 Project and has provided services for other City projects. Wallace Group is well qualified and has the expertise required to provide the services contemplated for the project.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
Yes.
907
Page | 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The project addresses the City Council’s Strategic Goals of Infrastructure, Public Safety, and Economic Development by providing an improved corridor for Salinas residents and travelers.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The Public Works Department is collaborating with Legal, Administration and Finance Departments for the execution of the Agreement, purchase order, and amendments, if any.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
This action has no anticipated impact on the General Fund. Additional funding of $2,789,077.56 will be included in the upcoming budget development process and consists of recommended reallocation of CIP projects funded by development impact fees (Fund 2306).
Fund General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name
Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
2306 50.9510-63.5400 Outside Services
Engineering Services
$2,288,927.90 $4,285,958
Remaining Budget Appropriate based on March 2026 CIP Balance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Wallace Group Agreement
908
RESOLUTION NO. ____________ (N.C.S)
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT TO WALLACE GROUP FOR THE
DESIGN AND RELATED SERVICES FOR THE BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT PHASE 2 (CIP 9510)
WHEREAS, the Public Works department has identified the need to utilize professional engineering design services for the detailed design phase of the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project; and
WHEREAS, in December 2025 to January 2026, the City of Salinas engaged in a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process to identify firms with the requisite qualifications to provide professional engineering design services; and
WHEREAS, on January 15, 2026, Public Works staff received a statement of qualifications from Wallace Group; and
WHEREAS, Wallace Group will be partnering with Kimley–Horn, Earth Systems Pacific, and EMC Planning to provide the full scope of services; and WHEREAS, Wallace Group is well qualified and have the expertise to provide the professional engineering design services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council approves the Agreement between the City of Salinas and Wallace Group for the design and related services for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project for a total amount not to exceed $4,285,958; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the City of Salinas, and as its act and deed, to execute the attached Professional Services Agreement; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute extensions and/or modifications to the Agreement and to take any additional action that may be necessary to effectuate the intent of this resolution.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
909
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
910
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND WALLACE
GROUP
911
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
Contents
RECITALS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 TERMS ........................................................................................................................................... 4
1. Scope of Service. ................................................................................................................. 4
2. Term; Completion Schedule. ............................................................................................... 4
3. Compensation. ..................................................................................................................... 4
4. Billing. ................................................................................................................................. 4
5. Meet & Confer. .................................................................................................................... 5
6. Additional Copies................................................................................................................. 5
7. Responsibility of Consultant. ............................................................................................... 5
8. Responsibility of City. ......................................................................................................... 5
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. .................................................................................... 6
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. ................................................................................... 6
11. Insurance. ............................................................................................................................. 6
12. Access to Records. ............................................................................................................... 6
13. Non-Assignability. ............................................................................................................... 6
14. Changes to Scope of Work. ................................................................................................. 7
15. Ownership of Documents. ................................................................................................... 7
16. Termination. ......................................................................................................................... 7
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. ................................................................ 8
18. Exhibits Incorporated. .......................................................................................................... 8
19. Independent Contractor. ....................................................................................................... 8
20. Integration and Entire Agreement. ....................................................................................... 9
21. Jurisdiction and Venue. ........................................................................................................ 9
22. Severability .......................................................................................................................... 9
23. Notices. ................................................................................................................................ 9
24. Nondiscrimination.............................................................................................................. 10
25. Conflict of Interest. ............................................................................................................ 10
26. Headings. ........................................................................................................................... 10
27. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................................................. 10
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. ................................................................................................ 10
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. ........................................................................ 10
30. Licenses.............................................................................................................................. 10
31. Counterparts. ...................................................................................................................... 11 912
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
32. Legal Representation. ........................................................................................................ 11
33. Joint Representation. .......................................................................................................... 11
34. Warranty of Authority........................................................................................................ 11
35. No Waiver of Rights. ......................................................................................................... 11 Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements .............................................................................................. 13 Exhibit B- Scope of Service .......................................................................................................... 16
913
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SALINAS AND WALLACE GROUP
This Agreement for Professional Services (the “Agreement” and/or “Contract”) is made and entered into this 16th day of June, 2026, between the City of Salinas, a California Charter city and municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), and Wallace Group, a California Corporation (hereinafter “Consultant”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that he, she, or it is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to render such professional services, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows:
TERMS
1. Scope of Service. The project contemplated and the scope of Consultant’s services are described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
2. Term; Completion Schedule. This Agreement shall commence on June 16, 2026, and shall terminate on March 31, 2032, unless extended in writing by either party upon (30) days written notice. This Agreement may be extended only upon mutual written consent of the parties and may be terminated only pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
3. Compensation. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant for services rendered the City pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis according to the rates of compensation as set forth in Exhibit B. The total amount of compensation to be paid under this Agreement shall not exceed $4,285,958.
4. Billing. Consultant shall submit to City an itemized invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to City, describing its services and costs for the period covered by the invoice.
Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant’s bills shall include the following information to which such services cost or pertain:
(A) A brief description of services performed;
(B) The date the services were performed;
(C) The number of hours spent and by whom;
914
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
(D) A brief description of any costs incurred; and
(E) The Consultant’s signature.
Any such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement.
City shall make payment on each such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt; provided, however, that if Consultant submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until thirty (30) days after a correct and complying invoice has been submitted by Consultant. The City shall process undisputed portion immediately.
5. Meet & Confer. Consultant agrees to meet and confer with City or its agents or employees with regard to services as set forth herein as may be required by the City to ensure timely and adequate performance of the Agreement.
6. Additional Copies. If City requires additional copies of reports, or any other material which Consultant is required to furnish as part of the services under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional copies as are requested, and City shall compensate Consultant for the actual costs related to the production of such copies by Consultant.
7. Responsibility of Consultant. By executing this Agreement, Consultant agrees that the services to be provided and work to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed in a fully competent manner. By executing this Agreement, Consultant further agrees and represents to City that the Consultant possesses, or shall arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources, and facilities necessary to provide the City the services contemplated under this Agreement and that City relies upon the professional skills of Consultant to do and perform Consultant’s work. Consultant further agrees and represents that Consultant shall follow the current, generally accepted practices in this area to the profession to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding the projects for which the services are rendered under this Agreement.
8. Responsibility of City. To the extent appropriate to the projects to be completed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, City shall:
(A) Assist Consultant by placing at its disposal all available information pertinent to the projects, including but not limited to, previous reports and any other data relative to the projects. Nothing contained herein shall obligate City to incur any expense in connection with completion of studies or acquisition of information not otherwise in the possession of City. (B) Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents presented by Consultant, and render verbally or in writing as may be appropriate, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of Consultant.
915
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
(C) City Manager, or his designee, shall act as City’s representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have the complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to Consultant’s services.
City may unilaterally change its representative upon notice to the Consultant. (D) Give prompt written notice to Consultant whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in a project.
9. Acceptance of Work Not a Release. Acceptance by the City of the work to be performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of Consultant from professional responsibility for the work performed.
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless.
Pursuant to the full language of California Civil Code §2782, design Consultant agrees to indemnify, including the cost to defend, City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, or liability that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of design Consultant and its employees or agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages arising from the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful acts of the City; and does not apply to any passive negligence of the City unless caused at least in part by the design Consultant. The City agrees that in no event shall the cost to defend charged to the design Consultant exceed that professional’s proportionate percentage of fault.
This duty to indemnify shall not be waived or modified by contractual agreement or acts of the parties.
11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance meeting the requirements specified in Exhibit A hereto.
12. Access to Records. Consultant shall maintain all preparatory books, records, documents, accounting ledgers, and similar materials including but not limited to calculation and survey notes relating to work performed for the City under this Agreement on file for at least three (3) years following the date of final payment to Consultant by City. Any duly authorized representative(s) of City shall have access to such records for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying at reasonable times during Consultant’s usual and customary business hours.
Consultant shall provide proper facilities to City’s representative(s) for such access and inspection.
13. Non-Assignability. It is recognized by the parties hereto that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. This Agreement is personal to Consultant and shall not be assigned by it without express written approval of the City.
916
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
14. Changes to Scope of Work. City may at any time, and upon a minimum of ten (10) days written notice, seek to modify the scope of services to be provided for any project to be completed under this Agreement. Consultant shall, upon receipt of said notice, determine the impact on both time and compensation of such change in scope and notify City in writing. Upon agreement between City and Consultant as to the extent of said impacts to time and compensation, an amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared describing such changes.
Execution of the amendment by City and Consultant shall constitute the Consultant’s notice to proceed with the changed scope.
15. Ownership of Documents. Title to all final documents, including drawings, specifications, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software (if purchased on the City’s behalf), video and audio tapes, software output, and any other materials with respect to work performed under this Agreement shall vest with City at such time as City has compensated Consultant, as provided herein, for the services rendered by Consultant in connection with which they were prepared. City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant against all damages, claims, lawsuits, and losses of any kind including defense costs arising out of any use of said documents, drawings, and/or specifications on any other project without written authorization of the Consultant.
16. Termination.
(A) City shall have the authority to terminate this Agreement, upon ten days written notice to Consultant, as follows:
(1) If in the City’s opinion the conduct of the Consultant is such that the interest of the City may be impaired or prejudiced, or
(2) For any reason whatsoever.
(B) Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of such amount as fairly compensates Consultant for all work satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination based upon the Consultant’s rates shown in Exhibit B and/or Section 3 of this Agreement, except that:
(1) In the event of termination by the City for Consultant’s default, City shall deduct from the amount due Consultant the total amount of additional expenses incurred by City as a result of such default. Such deduction from amounts due Consultant are made to compensate City for its actual additional costs incurred in securing satisfactory performance of the terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to, costs of engaging another consultant(s) for such purposes. In the event that such additional expenses shall exceed amounts otherwise due and payable to Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall pay City the full amount of such expense. (C) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, Consultant shall:
917
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
(1) Upon receipt of written notice of such termination promptly cease all services on this project, unless otherwise directed by City; and (2) Deliver to City all documents, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software output, video and audio tapes, and any other materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement. Such material is to be delivered to City in completed form; however, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15 herein, City may condition payment for services rendered to the date of termination upon Consultant’s delivery to the City of such material.
(D) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by City for any reason, City is hereby expressly permitted to assume the projects and complete them by any means, including but not limited to, an agreement with another party.
(E) The rights and remedy of the City and Consultant provided under this Section are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or appearing in any other section of this Agreement.
(1) Consultant may suspend or terminate this Agreement, upon written notice to the City, as follows:
(2) Due to failure of the City to make payments when due, unless and until Consultant has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and other approved related charges. Consultant shall have no liability whatsoever to the City for any costs or damages as a result of such suspension or termination caused by any breach of this Agreement by the City. Upon payment in-full by the City, Consultant shall resume services under this Agreement as mutually agreed upon, and the time schedule and compensation shall be equitably adjusted to compensate for the period of suspension plus any reasonable time and expense necessary for the Consultant to resume performance.
17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. Services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance and full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder.
18. Exhibits Incorporated. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement and attached to it are hereby incorporated in it by this reference. In the event there is a conflict between any of the terms of this Agreement and any of the terms of any exhibit to the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall control the respective duties and liabilities of the parties.
19. Independent Contractor. It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that Consultant, while engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Consultant expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee or servant of the City.
918
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
20. Integration and Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters contained herein. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except by amendment in writing signed by both parties.
21. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, County of Monterey, and City of Salinas.
Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in the State of California, in the County of Monterey or in the appropriate federal court with jurisdiction over the matter.
22. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, but the remainder of the Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect.
23. Notices.
(A) Written notices to the City hereunder shall, until further notice by City, be addressed to:
City Manager
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
With a copy to:
City Attorney
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Avenue
Salinas, California 93901
(B) Written notices to the Consultant shall, until further notice by the Consultant, be addressed to:
Wallace Group
ATTN: Jorge Aguilar, PE
Principal
612 Clarion Ct
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
(805) 544-4011
[email protected]
(C) The execution of any such notices by the City Manager shall be effective as to Consultant as if it were by resolution or order of the City Council, and Consultant shall not question the authority of the City to execute any such notice. 919
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
(D) All such notices shall either be delivered personally to the other party’s designee named above, or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, properly addressed as aforesaid, postage fully prepaid, and shall be effective the day following such deposit in the mail.
24. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, creed, sex, national origin, familial status, sexual orientation, age (over 40 years) or disability.
25. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and declares that it presently has no interest, and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any manner or degree which will render the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law. Consultant further declares that, in the performance of this Agreement, no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000 et seq.) and Salinas City Code Chapter 2A that apply to Consultant as the result of Consultant’s performance of the work or services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
26. Headings. The section headings appearing herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of this Agreement.
27. Attorneys’ Fees. In case suit shall be brought to interpret or to enforce this Agreement, or because of the breach of any other covenant or provision herein contained, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to such costs as may be allowed by the Court. City’s attorneys’ fees, if awarded, shall be calculated at the market rate.
28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive and both City and Consultant expressly reserves the right to contract with other entities for the same or similar services.
29. Rights and Obligations Under Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not intend to create any obligations express or implied other than those set out herein; further, this Agreement shall not create any rights in any party not a signatory hereto.
30. Licenses. If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of Consultant, its representatives, agents or subcontractors by federal, state or local law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good 920
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
standing, and that any applicable bond posted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.
32. Legal Representation. Each party affirms that it has been represented, if it so chose, by legal counsel of its own choosing regarding the preparation and the negotiation of this Agreement and the matters and claims set forth herein, and that each of them has read this Agreement and is fully aware of its contents and its legal effect. Neither party is relying on any statement of the other party outside the terms set forth in this Agreement as an inducement to enter into this Agreement.
33. Joint Representation. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. No presumptions or rules of interpretation based upon the identity of the party preparing or drafting the Agreement, or any part thereof, shall be applicable or invoked.
34. Warranty of Authority. Each party represents and warrants that it has the right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement. Each party further represents and warrants that it has given any and all notices, and obtained any and all consents, powers, and authorities, necessary to permit it, and the persons entering into this Agreement for it, to enter into this Agreement.
35. No Waiver of Rights. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. The failure to provide notice of any breach of this Agreement or failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver thereof.
Failure on the part of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or any other provision. A waiver by the City of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be construed as waiver(s) of any other condition of performance under this Agreement.
36. Subject to Availability of Funds. In the event that the City Council, or other governing body, fails to appropriate or budget sufficient funds for the continuation of this agreement, or should funds become unavailable for any other reason, the City reserves the right to terminate this agreement upon written notice. This termination shall be effective as of the last day of the fiscal year for which funds were appropriated. Upon such termination, the Consultant will be limited to compensation for satisfactory services rendered up to the termination date.
37. Levine Act Disclosure Compliance (Cal Government Code Sec. 84308). Consultant hereby affirms and warrants that it has not contributed to the campaign of any elected or appointed City official an amount totaling more than $500 within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this Agreement, except as Consultant has disclosed within its Levine Act Disclosure Form submitted by Consultant to the City. Consultant agrees, that in the event it makes any contributions subject to the Levine Act’s disclosure requirements within twelve (12) 921
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
months of the effective date of this Agreement, that it will file a Levine Act Disclosure Form (or Forms). Consultant acknowledges this duty of disclosure and that the City has made the Levine Act Disclosure Form(s) readily available on the City’s public internet site under Your Government / Transparency section for Consultant’s continuous compliance.
38. Electronic Execution of Agreement. The words “execution,” “signed,” “signature,” and words of like import in this Agreement and shall be deemed to include electronic signatures or electronic records (including, without limitation, DocuSign and AdobeSign), each of which shall be of the same legal effect, validity, enforceability, and admissibility as a handwritten signature.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF SALINAS
____________________________
René Mendez, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
□ Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney, or
□ Rhonda Combs, Assistant City Attorney
CONSULTANT
___________________________________
By (Printed Name): Jorge Aguilar, PE 48704
Its (Title): Principal
922
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
Exhibit A- Insurance Requirements
Insurance Requirements
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. With respect to General Liability and Professional Liability, coverage should be maintained for a minimum of five (5) years after Agreement completion.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(A)Commercial General Liability (“CGL”): Insurance Services Office Form (“ISO”) CG 00 01 covering CGL on an occurrence basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (B) Automobile Liability: ISO Form CA 0001 covering any auto, or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired and non-owned, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(C)Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(D)Professional Liability (also known as Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to the work being performed, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate per policy period of one year.
If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Salinas requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City of Salinas, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85, or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
Primary Coverage
923
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
For any claims related to this Agreement or the project described within this Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage, except for Professional Liability and Workers Compensation, at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.
Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Salinas for all work performed by the Consultant, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared by Consultant to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, Consultant shall provide coverage to reduce or eliminate such self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the consultant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administrations, and defense expenses. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of Agreement work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the Agreement effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of Agreement work.
4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.
Verification of Coverage
924
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable insurance language effecting coverage required by this Agreement. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all sub-consultants and/or subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from such sub-consultants and/or subcontractors.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Maintenance of Insurance
Maintenance of insurance by Consultant as specified shall in no way be interpreted as relieving Consultant of its indemnification obligations or any responsibility whatsoever and the Consultant may carry, at its own expense, such additional insurance as it deems necessary.
925
Form: Professional Services Agreement v. October 2025
Wallace Group
May 2026
Exhibit B- Scope of Service
Scope of Service; Compensation
(See Attached Exhibit B)
926
The Wallace Group team is grateful to have been selected to provide civil engineering design services for Phase 2 of the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project and is eager to continue the good work started with Phase 1! We enjoy working with the City and the camaraderie we have built. To that end, we would like to be transparent with our approach for scoping and budgeting for the project. We met as a team and defined tasks best suited for each team member and have built in overlapping quality control to provide the best final product. Our team came together to develop the following detailed scope of work tailored to this project and identified tasks needed to deliver these projects from final design through design support during construction.
The attached team budget was developed using a "ground up" approach: estimating number of hours per person per task. After this we compared the total support costs to the estimated construction costs for Phase 2. In 2020, our team developed ballpark construction costs for the corridor for use in a grant. We applied the growth ratio observed from the Phase 1 65% level cost estimate to the actual 2023 low bid results and applied an escalation rate to determine the approximate construction costs for Phase 2a and 2b at the time of their anticipated construction.
With construction anticipated to be underway in 2028 for Phase 2a and 2030 for Phase 2b, construction costs were estimated to be approximately $22.7M and $39.6M, respectively. Our "ground up" budget estimate is approximately 7% of the total estimated construction costs, which seems appropriate for a large project such as this.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1: Project Management and Meetings
Task 1.1 Project Management
This task consists of project management and coordination throughout the anticipated up to 63- month duration of the project, including bidding support and construction support for both project phases. This task includes project setup with staff and subconsultants, internal administration, budget/schedule monitoring, monthly reporting, and services invoicing for the project.
Task 1.2 Meetings
Wallace Group will schedule and attend a kick-off meeting for the project which will include task leads of the various disciplines and City staff. It is anticipated that this meeting will be hybrid to allow for in-person and virtual attendees, and a field walk will follow the meeting. This meeting will provide the opportunity for the participants to discuss the City’s desires for the project. We anticipate kicking off the preliminary engineering task immediately following this meeting, and it will be critical to gain consensus on the traffic volume data set, design vehicles and standards to be used in developing update concept layouts for each intersection. We also anticipate outlining the public outreach, environmental compliance, and potential grant support strategies. Our team will prepare an agenda and meeting notes inclusive of action items for distribution to the team.
We anticipate virtual meetings with City staff to review and discuss comments on the concept refinement, 60% PS&E, and 90% PS&E submittals for the two project phases. the two alternatives to solidify our strategy moving forward. Wallace Group will prepare an agenda for each meeting and follow up with relevant notes and action item listings.
To maintain communication and progress, we have also included up to monthly check in meetings with City staff and the Wallace Group project management team through the design phases.
Other public meetings will be attended as part of Task 8. 927
Task 1.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis
Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QA/QC) is an important part of our work products, and we have partnered with Kimley-Horn to provide the City peace of mind that the complex designs are vetted through a robust review process--from concept refinement through final PS&E. At each of the major draft design submittals, deliverables will undergo a QA/QC review by senior staff.
We will pay particular attention to review of the PS&E deliverables, as well as the stormwater quality calculations and design. We also plan to utilize our senior construction management team to provide a constructability review of the PS&E packages, and this will include developing conceptual construction schedules for each project. This overall review task and process is a critical component of a successful project and will ensure that the project team delivers a fully developed and polished product to the City.
Task 1.4 Grant Support (Optional Task)
If budgeted and authorized, the Wallace Group team can provide grant-related assistance to help advance the project to meet grant requirements and/or enhance competitiveness. We will conduct desktop research to identify potential funding programs for the unfunded portions of the project and develop a preliminary grant matrix and memorandum with viable programs to secure funding. The matrix will address minimum and maximum funding requests, matching requirements, eligibility, scoring criteria, anticipated program timeline, and opportunities to enhance competitiveness. Following completion of the grant matrix and memorandum, our team will attend a 1-hour virtual meeting to present the results of the research to the City.
Upon selection of a specific grant program or programs to submit an application, our team will provide the following services, if authorized this task will be conducted up to the budgeted amount:
• Grant-specific Exhibits
• Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
• Environmental Documentation
• Disadvantaged Community Research
• Benefit / Cost Analysis
• Grant Narrative
Deliverables:
• Status reports and invoicing
• Critical Path Method (CPM) Schedule and up to 6 updates • Meeting agendas and notes with action items
• Draft construction schedules
Task 2: Preliminary Engineering Studies
Task 2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts
KHA will obtain the latest Salinas General Plan Transportation Demand Model (TDM), from the City. KHA will work with the City to obtain any model documentation or guidance that will assist in the running of the new model and reviewing model files. This scope of services is based on the primary assumption that KHA will be able to run the new model locally with minimal coordination or assistance from the City. Traffic Forecast Year is assumed to be 2046.
KHA will run the TDM for the base year and the forecast year to obtain volumes for the three study intersections. Volumes will be post-processed by taking the difference in volumes between the base year and forecast year at the study intersections (the growth) and adding it to the traffic counts collected as part of the previous task. The post-processed volumes will be reviewed for 928
reasonableness and provided to the City. The existing and future study intersection traffic volumes will be provided in Excel files.
2.1.2 Intersection Operations
Roundabout traffic operations at the study intersections will be evaluated to confirm lane channelization identified in the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). This task will confirm the roundabout operations and test service life and design life sensitivity. The roundabout capacity and operations analysis will be conducted using Sidra Intersection 9 software using HCM 7 methodology and the Sidra Standard capacity models.
Service life operations will be evaluated to determine if acceptable operations can be accommodated with a smaller roundabout improvement for a minimum of 10-years, postconstruction. Service life operations will assume compound annual growth between the existing count data and forecast year.
We assume the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project ICE will serve as the traffic study for project approval. A supplemental memorandum will be prepared to document the operations and confirm the improvements recommended in the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project ICE.
The following items are included in this task:
• Perform peak hour intersection Level of Service (LOS) and queuing analysis for roundabout control during existing and future peak hour design year scenarios. Report the peak hour average control delay, LOS, volume to capacity ratio (v/c), and 95th percentile queue length for each approach by movement. Queue estimates will be examined relative to available storage lengths to nearby driveways and adjacent intersections.
• Conduct variable runs to test the sensitivity of the roundabouts to changes in geometric and traffic flow conditions.
2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements
Kimley-Horn will develop refined concept level roundabout improvement exhibits for the intersections of Boronda Road/El Dorado Drive and Boronda Road/Natividad Road, and Wallace Group will review and comment on the layouts. This jointly reviewed and developed product will then be reviewed with City staff. The refined concepts will evaluate approach and departure alignment alternatives, including the channelization of approach, circulatory, and departure lanes, with respect to known project constraints, design vehicles, right-of-way, local access, and utilities.
The roundabout conceptual layouts will be prepared using project AutoCAD files. The layouts will include pavement and color-coded areas identifying landscape opportunities and potential sight line constraints based on estimated sight lines. Project constraints and right-of-way will be identified.
Key features evaluated during this phase include:
• Size and location of roundabout relative to right-of-way and geometric constraints • Number of approach, departure, and circulatory lanes
• Channelization and striping strategies for circulating lanes and design vehicle accommodation
929
• Approach and departure alignment
• Design speed, design vehicle, and sight line considerations (Preliminary calculations will be conducted at this phase of concept refinement. Final design check calculations will be completed during 2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings)
• Local access impacts and circulation
• Travel paths for bicyclists and pedestrians
• Continuity for pedestrian travel and access to transit facilities • Estimated functional area of intersection based on roundabout geometric features and roundabout design influence areas.
The team will prepare up to two (2) concepts at each intersection for the Ultimate and Interim conditions. This may include alternative means to achieve target safety performance measures, pedestrian and vehicle site circulation, right-of-way impacts, utility avoidance, storm water treatment, environmental avoidance/mitigation areas, etc. In some cases, and at the discretion of the engineer, there could be a hybrid of various features that help explore the range of options and tradeoffs for each concept. We assume constraints at the project locations will be identified and provided by the City prior to development of the refined project concepts. Our team will develop up to two (2) draft concept layouts which will be independently peer-reviewed before providing to the City for review. After review by the City, one round of reasonable adjustments to the layout is included.
The preferred concept layouts will serve as the basis for optimization of the roundabout and geometric approval as described under Task 2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings.
2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum
This task includes the development of a Basis for Design Technical Memorandum which will summarize assumptions, design concepts, guideline criteria, and codes and regulations applied to the design. Subjects addressed will include assumptions considering safety and comfort of all roadway users, curb alignments, crosswalks, ADA requirements, retaining curbs/walls, traffic lane alignments, and bike lanes. We will identify any known design exceptions and anticipate updating this document again for the 60% PS&E submittals.
2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment
Consistent with Public Right of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) from the United States Access Board, Kimley-Horn will conduct an assessment of crossing performance checks for pedestrians with vision disabilities consistent with NCHRP Report 834: Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities.
Our team will conduct a pedestrian crossing assessment that includes the following three performance checks:
• Crossing sight distance (for pedestrians)
• Estimated level of pedestrian crossing delay
• Expected level of risk for blind pedestrians
930
The calculations and results of the pedestrian performance checks will be documented in a Roundabout Pedestrian Crossing Assessment Memorandum.
If the evaluation necessitates, or the recommendation is to install a pedestrian hybrid beacon system on the road legs where pedestrians may cross two or more lanes of traffic without refuge, a quantitative evaluation of the operations of a pedestrian hybrid beacon will be conducted using Sidra 9 software. The evaluation will estimate the number of queued vehicles when the beacon is activated during the peak hour. The result of the evaluation will inform the placement of the beacons and the distance between the crosswalks and the circulatory roadway of the roundabout.
If the pedestrian hybrid beacon is desired, it is assumed the design will be completed under a separate scope and fee.
2.1.6 Data Collection
This Scope of Services will advance findings from the previous Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project ICE prepared for the Project. We anticipate that the City will provide the following information:
• Recent/relevant Project area traffic data (i.e., volumes, classifications, speeds, collisions, etc.)
• Forecast traffic data (traffic volumes, truck volumes, etc.) for Cumulative Conditions (PDF of Volume Summary Sheets)
Our team will complete a site visit of the Project vicinity to observe existing operations and lane configurations, vehicle storage lengths, existing traffic control, speed limits, lane utilization, adjacent land uses, and other readily apparent features for the study facilities. Our team will coordinate with the City and Salinas Airport to obtain drone videos of the study intersections for analysis of existing vehicle movements.
This Scope of Services includes collection of up to two (2) total weekday, AM and PM peakperiod intersection turning movement counts (2 hours each peak, 8 hours total per intersection).
2.1.7 Traffic Simulation
KHA will prepare VISSIM simulations, using the facility traffic data collected under Subtask
2.1.6: Data Collection, for one roadway network including the following facilities:
• East Boronda Road, between approximately 200’ west of McKinnon Street and approximately 700 feet east of Natividad Road intersection (Full Corridor) • El Dorado Drive and Boronda Road (Intersection 1)
• Natividad Road and Boronda Road (Intersection 2)
The following scenarios will be evaluated:
• Full corridor with existing year volumes during peak-hours (AM & PM) and RRFB pedestrian control (Scenario 1)
• Full corridor with existing year volumes during peak-hours (AM & PM) and PHB or HAWK pedestrian control (Scenario 2)
• Full corridor with future year volumes during peak-hours (AM & PM) and RRFB pedestrian control (Scenario 3)
931
• Full corridor with future year volumes during peak-hours (AM & PM) and PHB or HAWK pedestrian control (Scenario 4)
Intersection 1 and Intersection 2 will be evaluated under roundabout control consistent with geometries established under 2.1.3: Concept Layout Refinements.
The simulation will qualitatively evaluate:
• Vehicle queuing at the study intersections
• Interactions between pedestrians and vehicles
• Interactions between cyclists and vehicles
Task 2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings
After approval of the ultimate condition roundabout layout, design check calculations will be prepared and documented for the design year roundabouts. This approach of first designing the ultimate and from that basis designing the two-lane roundabout is intended to establish the ultimate footprint (for preservation of Right of Way) while then designing the near-term roundabout to more readily be expanded in the future to the ultimate condition.
Design checks specific to vehicles navigating roundabout intersections will be calculated and documented in a Roundabout Performance Check Summary Memorandum. Roundabout curb geometry and lane markings will be adjusted to achieve target design values for estimated speeds, design vehicles, and sight lines. If site conditions or other constraints require a deviation from roundabout guidance described in the HDM, the deviation will be identified in the Roundabout Performance Check Summary Memorandum along with a description why the deviation is being requested. The following design checks will be evaluated for vehicles:
• Fastest path estimation for R1 through R5
• Swept path and tire tracking for design vehicles (Assume up to two design vehicles) • Intersection angle of visibility
• Intersection Sight Distance (Assume tc=5.0 seconds)
• Stopping Sight Distance
• Path overlaps estimation for multi-lane entries and departures We anticipate submitting the GAD and Roundabout Design Check Memoranda for City approval prior to moving into the final design phase for each project phase. Iterations of these documents are not anticipated to be required.
Task 2.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports
Wallace Group will prepare a preliminary Drainage Report and water quality report for the Phase 2 widening of East Boronda Road. These reports will build upon the analyses conducted under Phase 1 in the Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan and Offsite Drainage Report which addressed Phase 2 areas. We assume the preliminary water quality report is equivalent to a preliminary Stormwater Control Plan.
Both the preliminary SWCP and drainage report for the Phase 2 project will address the Phase 2A and 2B projects in separate sections of the same report; a final SWCP and drainage report for each individual project will be prepared separately during the subsequent PS&E phase.
The preliminary SWCP will follow the SWCP outline per the City's SWDS Appendix B and address post-construction stormwater management for the project, stormwater quality 932
requirements and SCM design concepts, and soil conditions including soil infiltration. Infiltration testing was previously conducted by Earth Systems Pacific at several locations along the Boronda Road improvements corridor in 2016. In total 4 locations were evaluated within the Phase 2A project area and 2 locations were evaluated within the Phase 2B project area (two depths each).
We assume six additional locations will be evaluated in the project 2A area and eight additional locations will be evaluated in the Project 2B area. Results will be summarized in the Phase 2A preliminary SWCP. The Preliminary SWCP will not include an Operations and Maintenance Manual (O&M Manual); the O&M Manual will be developed during the 60% PS&E phase.
The drainage report will be focused on onsite (roadway corridor) drainage improvements and hydraulic analysis as well as any offsite drainage improvements required for relocation of existing agricultural ditches. The report will also consider integration with future Phase 3 improvements, as necessary. The Drainage Report will provide recommended size and alignment of the new storm drain system and infiltration/treatment facilities. Drainage calculations will be prepared in accordance with Part II, Section II of the City of Salinas Standard Specifications, Design Standards and Standard Plans.
We assume that downstream water surface elevations in the storm drain system will be available from the Storm Water Master Plan. Design criteria will include:
• Design Storm – 20 Year
• Inlet Spacing – As required to meet the maximum allowable depth of water in street shoulders criteria.
• Maximum Depth of Water in Streets – Not to exceed the height of the curb for the 20- year design storm.
Information from these preliminary reports will be used to develop the Basis for Design Technical Memo.
Task 2.4 Geotechnical Recommendations
Earth Systems Pacific (Earth Systems) is on the Wallace Group team to provide geotechnical recommendations and support through design, bidding, and construction of both phases of the project. The purpose of Earth Systems’ geotechnical engineering investigation would be to identify and evaluate the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the proposed boring locations to compare to prior findings, and to use that information to generate updated designlevel soil engineering recommendations for the proposed road widening. Earth Systems proposes to evaluate subsurface soil conditions at the site by drilling exploratory borings using a track-mounted drill rig. In areas where drilling locations will have an impact on traffic flow, a contractor specializing in traffic control will be hired to direct traffic during drilling.
Earth Systems will complete exploration and identification of subsurface conditions through the drilling of five to eight (5 to 8) borings to a depth of approximately 5 feet. We anticipate that these borings will be mostly focused along Natividad Road and El Dorado Drive to supplement the previously obtained data along Boronda Road. The boring logs will include a description of soil encountered including color, major and minor components, Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) type(s), changes in soil conditions with depth, qualitative moisture content, density/consistency and plasticity, sampler type, sampling depths and laboratory test results.
Copies of the boring logs will be included in the updated report. The borings would be backfilled with soil cuttings generated during the drilling process and patched using cold-mix asphalt patch (where needed). Earth Systems will observe the utility potholing process to verify the pavement sections and underlying soil conditions.
We anticipate drilling of a total of fourteen (14) new infiltration test holes: 6 at El Dorado Drive and 8 at Natividad Road at depths and locations to be determined by the design team. Depths ranging from 2 feet to 8 feet are anticipated. The infiltration tests will be performed in general accordance with the Shallow Quick Infiltration Testing Methodology, Native Soil Assessment for Small Infiltration Based Stormwater Control Measures, Central Coast Low Impact Initiative 933
(2013). The test results will be included in the updated report and will include a brief description of the test methods, a map showing the approximate test locations, and tables of the infiltration test results.
Earth Systems will prepare an updated written report including engineering analysis of the data generated from the subsurface exploration, conclusions and updated geotechnical engineering recommendations and design criteria for the proposed project. The following items would be addressed in the report:
• Soil and groundwater conditions encountered at the site, • Expansion potential of near surface soil at the site, • Preparation of the site prior to grading,
• Grading criteria and suitability of onsite soils as engineered fill, • Exterior concrete flatwork,
• Utility trench backfills,
• Measured thickness of various components of existing pavement, • Surface drainage and finish improvements,
• Results of geotechnical laboratory tests performed on soil samples, • Geotechnical observation and testing.
Task 2.5 Landscape Concept
A draft landscape concept plan will be generated for the project comprised of planting and irrigation proposed for the project. We assume that the design of the corridor is to match the Phase 1 design, as worked out collaboratively with the City during that phase. The concept will account for minimizing landscape maintenance while maximizing worker safety and using lowwater plant material. Wallace Group will work with the City of Salinas on the proposed irrigation water meter connections and develop preliminary water use calculations to help determine approximate sizes and locations of the proposed meters.
We anticipate creating detailed plan exhibits to communicate the design intent to the City, including one (1) plan for each roundabout for Phases 2a and 2b at 1"=20' scale for a total of two (2) and up to four (4) plans to show the corridor (two (2) in the Phase 2a area and two (2) in the Phase 2b area) showing typical planting areas based on representative geometric configurations for a total of six (6) sheets. These plans will use a color graphic similar to the plan graphic for Phase 1 below.
934
To show the overall planting areas, the team will provide a landscape hatched exhibit showing the overall corridor’s landscape areas for Phases 2a and 2b which will include the proposed water meter connections. This is anticipated to be done at 1"=100' scale for a total of two (2) sheets (one for each phase). The team will provide a photo exhibit board of the proposed planting plan, including desired rock mulching, boulders, and other inert materials to complement the plans and better understand the design intent. We anticipate up to two (2) photo image boards.
Task 2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis
Kimley-Horn will coordinate with the City to collect existing available data which will serve as the basis for design. A lighting analysis for existing conditions will be performed in AGI32 lighting software and will include roadway lighting and safety lighting (lights at signalized intersections).
The proposed analysis will include proposed lights for roadway lighting to meet recommended values in RP-8 or as preferred by the City and proposed lighting at the proposed roundabouts.
Exhibits will be created to show the existing and proposed lighting along the corridor and project intersections. A table will be included to summarize the existing and proposed average illuminance and uniformity values along each of the corridors and intersections.
Task 2.7 Utility A Letters
The Wallace Group team will utilize a utility database that is kept by 811 Dig Alert to determine the utilities within the project limits. Based on our research and familiarity with the project area, we know that the City owns and maintains sanitary sewer and storm drain facilities, and we anticipate coordinating with the following utility purveyors:
• AT&T
• California Water Service
• Comcast
• PG&E
Our team will request utility atlas maps, existing facilities documentation, any proposed improvements planned, and information and verification of prior rights. We anticipate one request per company that will be inclusive of the total Phase 2 area. The utility atlas plans and our topographic mapping will serve as a base map for the utility plan sheets. We will use an electronic tracking system that can be shared with the City indicating when the Utility ‘A’ letters were sent, who they were sent to, date of follow up, date of response, if they have facilities at the site, and any remarks.
We will compile a matrix of existing utilities that will include:
• Utility Owner and contact information
• Utility type, size, material, estimated age (based on utility provider record information) • Correspondence dates and details
• Apparent conflicts with the proposed construction and potential relocation options.
Task 2.8 Environmental Commitment Record
EMC Planning Group (EMC) is on the Wallace Group team to provide environmental permitting support. CEQA documentation and resource agency permits are anticipated for construction of Phase 2, and conditions applicable to the proposed project are included in the following documents:
• Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (EMC Planning Group 2020); • Reinitiation of the Biological Opinion on the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project, Monterey County, California (Corps File No. SPL-2017-00402) (USFWS 2023); 935
• California Endangered Species Act Consistency Determination No. 2080-2023-015-04, Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project (CDFW 2023); and • Nationwide Permit Verification, Subject: File Number SPN-2017-00402 (USACE 2023). • Water Quality Certification No. 32720WQ18 for Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project – Phase 1 and 2, Monterey County (RWQCB 2021)
EMC Planning Group and Wallace Group will assemble and review environmental documentation and permits applicable to the project, including Phase 1 construction compliance records, change orders, and quarterly and annual reports.
Construction will require implementation of preconstruction, construction, and post-construction conditions listed in the resource agency permits listed above. To avoid change orders, EMC will provide a matrix of permit conditions and coordinate with the design team to include permit requirements in the bid package for the additional labor and materials needed to implement permit conditions. Particular emphasis will be placed on understanding work windows outside of the rainy season and installation and monitoring of exclusion fencing to meet federal and state endangered species protection requirements.
Deliverables:
• Existing and Forecast Volume Memorandum (Combined Phase 2) • Draft and final Traffic Operations Memorandum (Phase 2a, Phase 2b) • Draft and final concept layout exhibit (Phase 2a, Phase 2b) • Basis for Technical Design Memorandum (Combined Phase 2) • Roundabout Pedestrian Crossing Assessment Memorandum (Combined Phase 2) • Weekday AM and Weekday PM peak-hour VISSIM simulation video (four [4] total videos, Scenarios 1-4)
• Select 3-D VISSIM simulation video showing pedestrian-vehicle and cyclist-vehicle interactions at Intersection 1 & 2 (four [4] total videos, showing Intersections 1 & 2, Scenarios 1-4)
• Geometric Approval Drawings (Phase 2a, Phase 2b)
• Design Check Memorandum (Phase 2a, Phase 2b)
• Preliminary Drainage Report (Combined Phase 2)
• Preliminary SWCP (Combined Phase 2)
• Geotechnical Report (Combined Phase 2)
• Landscape Concept Planting and Irrigation Plans (Phase 2a, Phase 2b) • Plant Image Board (Phase 2a, Phase 2b)
• Draft and Final Photometrics Exhibit (Phase 2a, Phase 2b) • Draft "A" Letters (Combined Phase 2)
• Utility tracking matrix (Excel, ongoing)
• Environmental permit matrix
Task 3: Surveys and Mapping
Task 3.1 Survey Densification
As noted in the Understanding and Approach, Wallace Group’s survey team is very familiar with this project site. Much of the Phase 2 project area was mapped during Phase 1. As part of the Phase 2 survey scope of work, we anticipate reviewing the existing mapping applicable to Phase 2 and noting observed differences between what is shown in the mapping and the existing conditions. To the extent budget allows, the areas that have changed since the Phase 1 mapping was completed will be updated. This task also includes performing field surveys to locate significant features and conform level mapping. For budgeting purposes, this task includes:
936
1. Phase 1 Conform Location: Field surveying of approximately 750 feet of East Boronda Road to update mapping so improvements from the Phase 1 construction are shown.
2. El Dorado Drive, south of East Boronda Road, Conform: Approximately 320 feet of El Dorado Drive south of East Boronda Road and north of Cromwell Drive.
3. Natividad Road, south of East Boronda Road, Conform: Approximately 320 feet of Natividad Road, south of East Boronda Road, north of Arcadia Way.
4. Natividad Road, north of East Boronda Road, Conform: Approximately 450 feet of Natividad Road, approximately 700 to 1,150 feet north of East Boronda Road.
5. East Boronda Road at east end of Phase 2: Approximately 500 feet of East Boronda Road, 1,100 to 1,600 feet east of Natividad Road
See Figure 3.1 for illustration of approximate limits of mapping area to be reviewed and updated to existing conditions, shown highlighted in blue, conform mapping limits, shown highlighted in red.
FIGURE 3.1
Task 3.2 Right of Way Engineering
We will review the County of Monterey’s GIS survey records website for record maps that have been filed since the Phase 1 survey was completed. If these maps show changes or differences in the right of way as re-established as part of the Phase 1 work, we will provide further review and to the extent budget allows update the right of way, boundary and easement locations as appropriate. Any further needs will be brought to the attention of the City for additional authorization.
We will also review updates of the title reports that were used as part of Phase 1 and plot changes to right of way, boundary and easement lines that may be indicated within the updated title reports.
For budgeting purposes, this includes the following:
1. Reviewing up to four (4) newer record maps, and updating the existing mapping for up to one (1) item per map.
2. Ordering up to 10 title reports at a cost of $1,000 each and plotting up to five (5) new easements that are near and related to the Phase 2 project area. 937
Task 3.3 Record of Survey
The improvements related to Phase 2 of the project will very likely disturb and destroy existing survey monuments shown on publicly available survey maps, such as Records of Surveys. As such, the preservation and perpetuation of record survey monuments will be required to comply with State of California Business and Profession Code, Chapter 15, Section 8771.
Prior to the delivery of the bid package construction documents, we will have completed a preconstruction monument preservation and perpetuation survey. The timing of the preconstruction survey should be such that it is completed and recorded near to and prior to the start of construction.
This task includes reviewing the online County of Monterey GIS survey records website for record maps and documents and reviewing these for existing survey monuments that may be in jeopardy due to construction activities of Phase 2. We will investigate these locations and measure existing monuments found at them. We will set reference tie monuments sufficient to allow for a facile re-establishment of at jeopardy monument locations by another survey during the construction project, as required by state law.
The Record of Survey will show the limits of our monument investigation and for each record monument within the construction limits we will indicate whether the monument existed or not, the character and location of found and reference monuments.
For budgeting purposes, we have assumed:
1. This includes preserving and perpetuating the location of approximately 20 record monuments
2. Record monuments will be found in good condition, as shown on record maps, and will not require excavation through asphalt to access and measure.
3. We will submit one draft record of survey for review by the County Surveyor and one signed original record of survey.
4. One day of traffic control and safety will be sufficient to locate record monuments within the traveled way of the project roads.
Deliverables:
• Survey Base Map (PDF and DWG)
• Filed Record of Survey for Monument Preservation (Mylar and PDF copy) Task 4: Utility Coordination
Task 4.1 Potholing
As this project includes numerous stormwater planters, new storm drain and sanitary sewer facilities, streetlight foundations, and other work affecting the roadway subgrade, a focus on underground utilities is needed. We will delineate approximate existing utility lines based on atlas maps provided by the utility companies in Task 2; however, we will not know the depth of the facilities. It is beneficial to determine the vertical locations of these before construction to avoid surprises, potential delays, and increased construction costs. For budgeting purposes, we have included scope for up to 100 potholes to capture the main potential conflicts and these would be split between the two Phases of the project (assuming 40 for Phase 2a and 60 for Phase 2b). We anticipate identifying pothole locations based on the 60% design drawings and collecting and analyzing the data for the 90% design level.
938
T2 Utility Engineers (T2) is on the Wallace Group team to provide utility potholing services. The design team will identify proposed pothole locations based on atlas maps and the proposed underground design. T2 will utilize geophysical equipment and techniques to positively identify utility locations to be potholed prior to any excavation work. A field sketch of the utility premarking results, including comments and notes, will be provided. The design team will review the field sketch and approximate depth given by T2 to confirm pothole locations. This initial exploration may reduce the number of physical pothole locations needed to be excavated.
T2 will establish the vertical location, material, and size of selected utilities using air-vacuum excavation. T2 will apply for a No Fee encroachment permit with the City of Salinas. We anticipate that potholing work can be completed during normal weekday business hours; however, we understand that night work may be required for some pothole locations, particularly at the busy Natividad intersection. Traffic control will be provided by T2 compliant with the CA MUTCD, and traffic control plans are not anticipated. Following excavation, the potholes will be backfilled with native material, compacted with a pneumatic tamper, and surface restored with cold patch asphalt, concrete, or native materials as required. T2 will prepare and submit data reports including photo logs and distances to three reference points.
To provide efficiency in the project schedule and budget and to enhance the available existing data, we anticipate strategically scheduling our survey team and geotechnical team to complete their field work concurrently with the utility potholing effort. Wallace Group's survey team will complete the field densification surveys and conform mapping and will collect the USA markings and patched back pothole locations to verify the locations. Earth Systems will examine the existing pavement structural sections and the subgrade material. We anticipate two separate mobilizations for this task--one for each project phase. Our design team will use the survey data and the triangulation data to locate the potholed locations in our base mapping, add the data to plans and utility profiles, and reconciling the design.
Task 4.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters)
During the 90% design process for each Phase of the project, Wallace Group will use the pothole data and proposed design to identify potential utility conflicts and will prepare draft “B” Letters (also known as “Notice to Owners”) for the City's review. These letters serve to inform affected utility owners of known/identified conflict locations of their utility facilities with the proposed project. We will develop utility conflict resolution exhibits to attach to each letter which will include detailed call outs for existing facilities and conflict locations.
This task includes utility coordination meetings. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed that Wallace Group will coordinate and attend up to two meetings with up to five companies for each phase of the project (20 meetings in total). The first meeting is anticipated to be virtual and would serve to introduce the project to the utility companies, discuss potential conflicts, and discuss the WASP and CASP developments to confirm if the existing utilities do or do not meet the future growth needs and determine if upgrades require accommodation. The second meeting is anticipated to be in person and would focus on the known conflict locations following the potholing task. Our team will discuss potential relocation strategies; however, the design of their facilities is not included in our scope of work. Wallace Group will develop meeting agenda, notes, and action items.
PG&E Coordination for Service: The Wallace Group team will prepare and submit the PG&E applications for service for street lighting, crosswalk treatments, and irrigation controller. Our team will coordinate with PG&E to identify appropriate service points. Wallace Group will prepare a draft application for City review and approval. Our team will then submit the application via PG&E’s online platform. The City will receive an invoice from PG&E for the Engineering Advance (i.e. deposit), which will need to be paid within 30 days. We will coordinate 939
with PG&E through the start of construction to facilitate connection to existing or proposed service points.
Task 4.3 Utility Agreements ("C" Letters)
For each Phase of the project prior to Final PS&E and assumed after parties have agreed on a relocation plan, we will work with the City to help send the utility companies a “C” letter, which is a Utility Agreement. The Utility Agreement will spell out each party’s responsibilities for utility relocation, such as timing of relocation and payment for the relocation. Wallace Group will provide the City with draft final “C” letters and assist the City with this coordination; however it is anticipated that affected utility facility owners will provide utility agreements to the City for their review and action directly and we will assist in the review of those documents with the City.
Deliverables:
• Pothole Location Exhibits (PDF)
• Up to 100 Pothole Data Sheets (PDF)
• Locations of utilities (CAD)
• Draft “B” letters with conflict resolution exhibits (PDF) • Meeting agenda, notes, action items (PDF)
• Draft “C” letters (PDF)
• Utility tracking matrix (Excel, ongoing)
Task 5: Right of Way Determination
Wallace Group will work with the City to determine project needs and how those needs will interface with development needs. It is assumed that the City will lead this portion and Wallace Group will support, and the legal description work will only begin once the development coordination is finalized.
Wallace Group will review right-of-way records, coordinate with the West Area Specific Plan (WASP) developments, and provide legal descriptions and exhibit maps (stamped and signed) including closure calculations for the right of way acquisitions on the north side of Boronda Road impacted by the Phase 2 project. The acquisition exhibits will be like what was generated for Phase 1 and what is required by Caltrans for Appraisal Maps (see Section 4-5 of their Plans and Preparation Manual). For each acquisition we will craft a legal description and exhibit map.
For budgeting purposes, we have assumed the following:
1. We will provide Appraisal Exhibits and Legal Descriptions with Exhibit Maps for up to four (4) properties and up to eight (8) acquisitions.
2. One (1) Appraisal Exhibits will be prepared for affected properties, up to four (4).
3. Individual legal descriptions and exhibit maps will be prepared for each acquisition, up to eight (8).
4. We will submit one (1) draft PDF package of Appraisal Exhibit delivery and respond to one (1) set of unified comments.
5. We will submit one (1) signed original PDF package of Appraisal Exhibit delivery.
6. We will submit one (1) draft map check delivery PDF package for legal descriptions and exhibit maps and respond to one set of unified comments.
7. We will submit one (1) electronically signed original legal description and exhibit map PDF package delivery.
8. Appraisal and acquisition services are not required. 940
See Figure 5 for the anticipated properties that will be impacted by the Phase 2 design and require acquisition support. These properties are highlighted and noted in blue.
FIGURE 5
Deliverables:
• Draft PDF’s of appraisal exhibits
• Signed original PDF’s of appraisal exhibits
• Draft map check submittal of PDF legal descriptions and exhibit maps • Signed original PDF’s of legal descriptions and exhibit maps • Map checks and final submittals
Task 6: Phase 2a Package
Phase 2 of the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project will be split into two separate projects to aid in project approval and funding. Task 6 is for final design through construction support of Phase 2a which conforms at the McKinnon Street roundabout where the full width cross section terminates and will include widening the roadway and median from there to the Boronda Road/El Dorado Drive intersection. This Phase will also include tapering back to existing on the south leg of El Dorado Drive and the east leg of Boronda Road. The north leg of El Dorado Drive will be designed to a logical terminus to conform with future growth as part of the WASP development.
Wallace Group staff will lead the design effort for Phase 2a with Kimley-Horn supporting design of the signing and striping, lighting and pedestrian crossing beacons. The direction for the design will be based on coordination with the City to date and it is not expected that the future design will vary from the approved GAD. Prior to the two draft submittals, the PS&E packages will be reviewed by independent reviewers for technical completeness and consistency as well as multilane roundabout detail updates.
941
Task 6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans
The Wallace Group team will develop the GAD designs prepared and approved in Task 2 to a 60% level of detail. Plan sheets will be prepared using Wallace Group's standard title block on 22”x34” sheets at 1” = 20’ scale with close up details as needed. The plans will assist in further identifying specific project needs and recommend solutions to meet those needs.
Storm drain plan, profile, and detail drawings will be prepared for a proposed roadway storm drain network along Boronda Road and El Dorado Road with proposed connections to the Phase 1 storm drain system terminating east of McKinnon Street. Stormwater control measures provided in the median, sidewalk planters, and splitter islands will have overflow outlets connecting to the proposed storm drain main. Relocated agricultural ditches may conform to the ditch on the north side of Boronda constructed under Phase 1. Details will be provided for the stormwater facilities using City standards where applicable.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile drawing will be provided for a trunk line in Boronda Road to be extended from the Phase 1 limit to the eastern Phase 2a limit. Stub-outs for future connections to the north will be provided where required.
Wallace Group's Landscape Architecture Department will prepare landscape planting, irrigation, and Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) calculation plans. Planting plans will provide plant schedule, planting types, sizes, quantities, and locations. Irrigation plans will provide irrigation equipment types, layout, and water demand calculations (MAWA) as required for landscape water efficiency ordinances and City review.
The following sheets are anticipated:
• Title Sheet....................................................................................(1 sheet, No Scale) • General Notes...............................................................................(2 sheets, No Scale) • Key Map.......................................................................................(1 sheet, 1"=100' Scale) • Project Control Plan.................................................................... (1 sheet, 1"=100' Scale) • Typical Cross Sections.................................................................(9 sheets, No Scale) • Demolition Plans......................................................................... (2 sheets, 1"=50' Scale) • Layouts......................................................................................... (9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Profiles......................................................................................... (10 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Construction Details.................................................................... (12 sheets, scale varies) • Contour Grading Plan..................................................................(9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Drainage Plan...............................................................................(9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Drainage Profiles..........................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Drainage Details...........................................................................(6 sheets, scale varies) • Utility Plan................................................................................... (9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Sanitary Sewer Plan......................................................................(9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Sanitary Sewer Profiles.................................................................(5 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Construction Area Signs.............................................................. (1 sheet, No Scale) • Motorist Information Plan...........................................................(1 sheet, No Scale) • Stage Construction Plans............................................................. (12 sheets, 1"=50' Scale) • Pavement Delineation Plans........................................................(9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Signing Plans................................................................................ (9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Signing Details and Quantities.....................................................(4 sheets, scale varies) • Planting Plans...............................................................................(9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Planting Notes and Details...........................................................(1 sheet, scale varies) 942
• Irrigation Plans.............................................................................(9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Irrigation Calculations, Notes, and Details..................................(4 sheets, scale varies) • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan............................................(9 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Flashing Beacon System Plans.....................................................(2 sheets, scale varies) • Lighting Plans, Notes, and Details...............................................(10 sheets, scale varies) Total Estimated Plan Sheets........................................................ 184 This task also includes finalizing the Basis for Design Technical Memorandum to capture any updates and potential design exceptions.
6.1.2 60% Technical Specifications
Construction specifications will be produced based on applicable City and Caltrans standards as appropriate. With our current schedule we anticipate the technical specifications will be formatted per Caltrans 2026 Construction Contract Specification format. We anticipate the City will prepare front end and bidding sections of this document, and our team will provide the technical section with stamps for each discipline. At 60%, the technical specifications will be outline format only, and detailed provisions will be added at the 90% submittal.
6.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate) Preliminary quantity takeoffs will be generated based on the draft 60% design. Relevant unit bid information will be acquired from the City and the State’s “As-Bid” databases and adjusted to represent anticipated project costs. Based on this information, a Draft Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (EOPCC) will be generated and submitted to the City for review.
We anticipate using a 15% contingency at this stage.
6.1.4 Draft SWCP
A stormwater control plan will be prepared in accordance with the City’s SWDS and Central Coast PCRs. Based on the concept plan, it is anticipated that the project will be subject to site design, water quality treatment, retention, and peak flow management performance requirements (PR-1 through PR-4) since it is located in Watershed Management Zone (WMZ) 1 and will create and/or replace more than 22,500 square feet of net impervious area. Wallace Group will develop a Storm Water Control Plan (SWCP) and Stormwater Control Operations and Maintenance Plan (O&M Plan) for the Phase 2a project.
Wallace Group will analyze the existing conditions of the site for comparison to postdevelopment conditions. Onsite drainage management areas (DMAs) will be delineated based on topographical survey data and hydrological analysis will be run to compare the pre- and postdevelopment scenarios. Both a review of the mapping and site visit will be performed to verify drainage patterns.
Portions of this project are likely to meet the criteria for redevelopment as defined in the PCR’s to take advantage of a reduction in the required retention volume. Wallace Group will collaborate with the City to select the appropriate stormwater control measures (SCMs) to comply with the site design, water quality, and retention requirements. Such facilities may include bioretention basins, biofiltration facilities, vegetated swales, and/or underground retention. At the 60% stage, the draft O&M Plan will consist mainly of an outline of required sections with project information provided as available at the 60% design level.
6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
A hydrological and hydraulic analysis for proposed Phase 2a improvements will be performed to ensure the City’s hydraulic design criteria (found in the City’s Standard Specifications, Design Standards, and Standard Plans) for drainage features are met. Analysis will include hydrological analysis for calculating runoff and hydraulic analysis of storm facility capacity including proposed 943
pipes, culverts, inlets, and gutters. In addition, hydraulic analysis of proposed stormwater control measures will be addressed. We anticipate calculating runoff generated under the 95th percentile storm event, as well as the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year, and 24-hour storm events. In accordance with City standards, hydraulic capacity for drainage facilities will be based on the 20-year, 6-hour storm event.
Results from these analyses will be summarized in a Draft Drainage Report and incorporated into the drainage system design shown on the construction documents.
6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
This task includes consultation with EMC to incorporate analysis and conditions contained in the permits into the 60% project design of Phase 2a. Four (4) meetings between EMC biologists and the project design team are included in this task.
Deliverables:
• 60% Plans (PDF)
• Final Basis for Design Technical Memorandum (PDF)
• 60% Technical Specifications (Word and PDF)
• 60% Cost Estimate (PDF)
• Draft 60% Phase 2a SWCP (PDF)
• Draft 60% Phase 2a O&M Plan (PDF)
• Draft 60% Phase 2a Drainage Report (PDF)
Task 6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans
At the beginning of this task, we anticipate receiving written comments on the 60% PS&E task deliverables. The Wallace Group team will coordinate, attend, and provide notes on the 60% submittal review meeting using video conferencing software with City staff. The final design will proceed based upon the comments and mutually agreed upon resolution. It is anticipated that comments will be relatively minor, and adjustments to the approved configuration will not be required at this stage of design. We will formalize our understanding of the City’s feedback and verify comments have been addressed using our Comment Resolution forms as we proceed with preparations of the final construction documents. The project design and plans will be further developed with relevant details, notes, and pay item callouts.
6.2.2 90% Technical Specifications
The technical specifications outline will be filled in with detailed provisions tailored to the project components. We will include Caltrans standard special provisions (SSPs) and write our own when needed following Caltrans standards. We will note areas that require City input and coordination.
6.2.3 90% Cost Estimate
The cost estimate will be updated based on any changes to the project design and submitted to the City for review. We anticipate using a 10% contingency at this stage.
6.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
The stormwater management design will be further developed for the 90% submittal with details, plans, and calculations for the proposed structural control measures. City comments on the 60% stormwater control plan and design will be evaluated and incorporated into the plans where necessary. Calculations and documentation of compliance with the PCR’s will be provided.
Wallace Group will update the draft O&M Plan to describe the selected stormwater facilities in more detail than provided in the 60% draft O&M Plan. The plan will provide instructions on how the facilities function 944
and how they should be maintained to promote long-term performance. This task includes incorporating City comments on the 60% draft O&M Plan.
6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
The Drainage Report will be finalized for the 90% submittal with analysis updated for revisions based on review of the 60% design.
6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
This task includes consultation with EMC to incorporate analysis and conditions contained in the permits into the 90% project design of Phase 2a. Two (2) meetings between EMC biologists and the project design team are included in this task.
Deliverables:
• 90% Plans (PDF)
• 90% Technical Specifications (Word and PDF)
• 90% Cost Estimate (PDF)
• Draft 90% Phase 2a Storm Water Control Plan (PDF)
• Draft 90% Phase 2a O&M Plan (PDF)
• Draft 90% Phase 2a Drainage Report (PDF)
Task 6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
At the beginning of this task, we anticipate receiving written comments on the 90% PS&E task deliverables. The Wallace Group team will coordinate, attend, and provide notes on the 90% submittal review meeting using video conferencing software with City staff. The final design will proceed based upon the comments and mutually agreed upon resolution. It is anticipated that comments will be relatively minor, and adjustments to the approved configuration will not be required at this stage of design. We will formalize our understanding of the City’s feedback and verify comments have been addressed using our Comment Resolution forms as we proceed with preparations of the final construction documents.
6.3.1 Final Plans
The project design and plans will be finalized and further developed with relevant details, notes, and pay item callouts. Upon completion, the plan sheets will be delivered to the City for review and approval.
6.3.2 Final Technical Specifications
Technical specifications will be finalized based on minor revisions to the plans or bid items.
6.3.3 Final Cost Estimate
The cost estimate will be finalized based on minor revisions to the project plans or bid items. We anticipate using a 5% contingency at this stage.
Following these revisions, the bid documents will be stamped, sealed, and presented to the City for advertisement for construction.
6.3.4 Final SWCP
Wallace Group will update and submit the Final SWCP and O&M Plan after incorporation of revisions based on reconciled comments from the City on the 60% submittal.
6.3.5 Final Drainage Report
Wallace Group will update and submit the Final Drainage Report after incorporation of revisions based on reconciled comments from the City on the 60% submittal. 945
6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
This task includes consultation with EMC to incorporate analysis and conditions contained in the permits into the final project design of Phase 2a. One (1) meeting between EMC biologists and the project design team is included in this task.
Deliverables:
• Final Plans (PDF, DWG)
• Final Technical Specifications (Word and PDF)
• Final Cost Estimate (PDF)
• Final Phase 2a Storm Water Control Plan (PDF)
• Final Phase 2a O&M Plan (PDF)
• Final Phase 2a Drainage Report (PDF)
Task 6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a)
During the advertising phase of the project, Wallace Group design staff will be available to answer bidding related questions, provide revised plan sheets and quantities and provide information to the City for their preparation of addenda. We will also be available to review the City’s bid tabulation to provide our input on the responsiveness of bidders. Due to the indeterminate nature of the coordination/support requests, this task is currently intended to proceed on a time and materials basis to the budgeted amount shown for this task. If more support requests are received, they are to be authorized by the City as additional work.
Deliverables:
• Response to RFI’s and review of City’s bid tabulation • Addenda (if needed)
Task 6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a)
To support the City during the construction phase of the project, the Wallace Group team will provide Design Support During Construction (DSDC) under the City’s direction. While we expect the City and their Construction Management team to manage direct formal communications with the construction Contractor forces, our team will be available to attend construction meetings, assist in submittal reviews and responses to Contractor Requests for Information (RFI's), review required shop drawing submittals and provide consultation and other typical DSDC supports.
Construction Management and Construction Contractor staff are expected to maintain clean and clear records of field changes authorized by the City and deemed necessary to accommodate construction means and methods. The DSDC team will be available to assist in the preparation of “as-built” drawings based on clean and legible markups provided by the City and the construction phase staff.
This task is offered as budget allows through the end of the project construction. Due to the indeterminate nature of the coordination/support requests, this task is currently intended to proceed within the budgeted amount on a time and materials basis to the NTE amount shown for this task. If more support requests are received, they are to be authorized by the City as additional work (as/if needed).
Deliverables:
• Review and respond to material submittals
• Review and respond to RFI’s
• Perform site visits to review issues or concerns
• Prepare revisions to plan sheets or added detail drawings for construction clarifications • Assist in the determination of quantities and payment analysis for potential changes 946
• Record drawings
Task 7: Phase 2b Package
Task 7 is for final design through construction support of Phase 2b which conforms at the El Dorado Drive roundabout taper where the full width cross section terminates and will include widening the roadway and median from there to the Boronda Road/Natividad Road intersection.
This Phase will also include tapering back to existing on Natividad Road and the east leg of Boronda Road prior to Gabilan Creek.
Kimley-Horn staff will lead the design effort for Phase 2b with Wallace Group providing the project control plan, drainage, utility, sewer, planting and irrigation design. The direction for the design will be based on coordination with the City to date and it is not expected that the future design will vary from the approved GAD. Prior to the two draft submittals, the PS&E packages will be reviewed by independent reviewers for technical completeness and consistency as well as multilane roundabout details.
Task 7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans
The Wallace Group team will develop the GAD designs prepared and approved in Task 2 to a 60% level of detail. Plan sheets will be prepared using Wallace Group's standard title block on 22”x34” sheets at 1” = 20’ scale with close up details as needed. The plans will assist in further identifying specific project needs and recommend solutions to meet those needs.
Storm drain plan, profile, and detail drawings will be prepared for a proposed roadway storm drain network along Boronda Road and Natividad Road with proposed connections to the existing storm drain system located in Boronda Road east of El Dorado Road. Stormwater control measures provided in the median, sidewalk planters, and splitter islands will have overflow outlets connecting to the existing storm drain main. If relocated agricultural ditches are required, drainage inlet structures may be provided for connection to the storm drain system.
Details will be provided for the stormwater facilities using City standards where applicable.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile drawing will be provided for a trunk line to be extended from the Phase 2a limit to a location coordinated with the WASP and CASP near Natividad Road. Stub outs for future connections to the north will be provided where required.
This task includes the placement of a conduit per the City requirements for future fiber optic needs at a minimum depth of 3-feet. The City will provide Wallace Group with the preferred horizontal location and conduit diameter for design.
Wallace Group's Landscape Architecture Department will prepare landscape planting, irrigation, and MAWA calculation plans. Planting plans will provide plant schedule, planting types, sizes, quantities, and locations. Irrigation plans will provide irrigation equipment types, layout, and water demand calculations (MAWA) as required for landscape water efficiency ordinances and City review.
The following sheets are anticipated:
• Title Sheet....................................................................................(1 sheet, No Scale) • General Notes.............................................................................. (2 sheets, No Scale) • Key Map.......................................................................................(1 sheet, 1"=100' Scale) • Project Control Plan.................................................................... (1 sheet, 1"=100' Scale) • Typical Cross Sections.................................................................(11 sheets, No Scale) 947
• Demolition Plans......................................................................... (3 sheets, 1"=50' Scale) • Layouts.........................................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Profiles......................................................................................... (12 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Construction Details.................................................................... (14 sheets, scale varies) • Contour Grading Plan..................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Drainage Plan...............................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Drainage Profiles..........................................................................(14 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Drainage Details...........................................................................(7 sheets, scale varies) • Utility Plan....................................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Sanitary Sewer Plan......................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Sanitary Sewer Profiles.................................................................(6 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Construction Area Signs.............................................................. (1 sheet, No Scale) • Motorist Information Plan...........................................................(1 sheet, No Scale) • Stage Construction Plans............................................................. (18 sheets, 1"=50' Scale) • Pavement Delineation Plans........................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Signing Plans................................................................................ (11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Signing Details and Quantities.....................................................(5 sheets, scale varies) • Planting Plans...............................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Planting Notes and Details...........................................................(1 sheet, scale varies) • Irrigation Plans.............................................................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Irrigation Calculations, Notes, and Details..................................(4 sheets, scale varies) • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan............................................(11 sheets, 1"=20' Scale) • Flashing Beacon System Plans.....................................................(6 sheets, scale varies) • Lighting Plans, Notes, and Details...............................................(12 sheets, scale varies) Total Estimated Plan Sheets........................................................ 230 This task also includes finalizing the Basis for Design Technical Memorandum to capture any updates and potential design exceptions.
7.1.2 60% Technical Specifications
Construction specifications will be produced based on applicable City and Caltrans standards as appropriate. Based on our schedule we anticipate the technical specifications will initially be formatted per Caltrans 2026 Construction Contract Specification format. We anticipate the City will prepare front end and bidding sections of this document, and our team will provide the technical section with stamps for each discipline. At 60%, the technical specifications will be outline format only, and detailed provisions will be added at the 90% submittal.
7.1.3 60% Cost Estimate
Preliminary quantity takeoffs will be generated based on the draft 60% design. Relevant unit bid information will be acquired from the City and the State’s “As-Bid” databases and adjusted to represent anticipated project costs. Based on this information, a Draft Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (EOPCC) will be generated and submitted to the City for review.
We anticipate using a 15% contingency at this stage.
7.1.4 Draft SWCP
Wallace Group will develop a Storm Water Control Plan (SWCP) and Draft Stormwater Control Operations and Maintenance Plan (O&M Plan) for the Phase 2b project following the same scope as presented for Phase 2a (see Task 6.1.4).
948
7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
A hydrological and hydraulic analysis for proposed Phase 2b improvements will be performed to ensure the City’s hydraulic design criteria (found in the City’s Standard Specifications, Design Standards, and Standard Plans) for drainage features are met. Wallace Group will prepare a Draft Drainage Report following the same scope as presented for Phase 2a (see Task 6.1.5).
7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
This task includes consultation with EMC to incorporate analysis and conditions contained in the permits into the 60% project design of Phase 2b. Four (4) meetings between EMC biologists and the project design team are included in this task.
Deliverables:
• 60% Plans (PDF)
• Final Basis for Design Technical Memorandum (PDF)
• 60% Technical Specifications (Word and PDF)
• 60% Cost Estimate (PDF)
• Draft 60% Phase 2b Storm Water Control Plan (PDF)
• Draft 60% Phase 2b O&M Plan (PDF)
• Draft 60% Phase 2b Drainage Report (PDF)
Task 7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans
At the beginning of this task, we anticipate receiving written comments on the 60% PS&E task deliverables. The Wallace Group team will coordinate, attend, and provide notes on the 60% submittal review meeting using video conferencing software with City staff. The final design will proceed based upon the comments and mutually agreed upon resolution. It is anticipated that comments will be relatively minor, and adjustments to the approved configuration will not be required at this stage of design. We will formalize our understanding of the City’s feedback and verify comments have been addressed using our Comment Resolution forms as we proceed with preparations of the final construction documents. The project design and plans will be further developed with relevant details, notes, and pay item callouts.
7.2.2 90% Technical Specifications
The technical specifications outline will be filled in with detailed provisions tailored to the project components. Based on our current schedule we will update to include 2027 Caltrans standard special provisions (SSPs) and write our own when needed following Caltrans standards. We will note areas that require City input and coordination.
7.2.3 90% Cost Estimate
The cost estimate will be updated based on any changes to the project design and submitted to the City for review. We anticipate using a 10% contingency at this stage.
7.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
The stormwater management design will be further developed for the 90% submittal with details, plans, and calculations for the proposed structural control measures. City comments on the 60% stormwater control plan and design will be evaluated and incorporated into the plans where necessary. Calculations and documentation of compliance with the PCR’s will be provided.
Wallace Group will update the draft O&M Plan to describe the selected stormwater facilities in more detail than provided in the 60% draft O&M Plan. The plan will provide instructions on how the facilities function and how they should be maintained to promote long-term performance. This task includes incorporating City comments on the 60% draft O&M Plan.
949
7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
The Drainage Report will be finalized for the 90% submittal with analysis updated for revisions based on review of the 60% design.
7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
This task includes consultation with EMC to incorporate analysis and conditions contained in the permits into the 90% project design of Phase 2b. Up to two (2) meetings between EMC biologists and the project design team are included in this task.
Deliverables:
• 90% Plans (PDF)
• 90% Technical Specifications (Word and PDF)
• 90% Cost Estimate (PDF)
• Draft 90% Phase 2b Storm Water Control Plan (PDF)
• Draft 90% Phase 2b O&M Plan (PDF)
• Draft 90% Phase 2b Drainage Report (PDF)
Task 7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
At the beginning of this task, we anticipate receiving written comments on the 90% PS&E task deliverables. The Wallace Group team will coordinate, attend, and provide notes on the 90% submittal review meeting using video conferencing software with City staff. The final design will proceed based upon the comments and mutually agreed upon resolution. It is anticipated that comments will be relatively minor, and adjustments to the approved configuration will not be required at this stage of design. We will formalize our understanding of the City’s feedback and verify comments have been addressed using our Comment Resolution forms as we proceed with preparations of the final construction documents.
7.3.1 Final Plans
The project design and plans will be finalized and further developed with relevant details, notes, and pay item callouts. Upon completion, the plan sheets will be delivered to the City for review and approval.
7.3.2 Final Technical Specifications
Technical specifications will be finalized based on minor revisions to the plans or bid items.
7.3.3 Final Cost Estimate
The cost estimate will be finalized based on minor revisions to the project plans or bid items. We anticipate using a 5% contingency at this stage.
Following these revisions, the bid documents will be stamped, sealed, and presented to the City for advertisement for construction.
7.3.4 Final SWCP
Wallace Group will update and submit the Final SWCP and O&M Plan after incorporation of revisions based on reconciled comments from the City on the 60% submittal.
7.3.5 Final Drainage Report
Wallace Group will update and submit the Final Drainage Report after incorporation of revisions based on reconciled comments from the City on the 60% submittal.
7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
This task includes consultation with EMC to incorporate analysis and conditions contained in the permits into the final project design of Phase 2b. One (1) meeting between EMC biologists and the project design team is included in this task.
950
Deliverables:
• Final Plans (PDF and DWG)
• Final Technical Specifications (Word and PDF)
• Final Cost Estimate (PDF)
• Final Phase 2b Storm Water Control Plan (PDF)
• Final Phase 2b O&M Plan (PDF)
• Final Phase 2b Drainage Report (PDF)
Task 7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b)
During the advertising phase of the project, Wallace Group team staff will be available to answer bidding related questions, provide revised plan sheets and quantities and provide information to the City for their preparation of addenda if necessary. We will also be available to review the City’s bid tabulation to provide our input on the responsiveness of bidders. Due to the indeterminate nature of the coordination/support requests, this task is currently intended to proceed on a time and materials basis to the budgeted amount shown for this task. If more support requests are received, they are to be authorized by the City as additional work.
Deliverables:
• Response to RFI’s and review of City’s bid tabulation • Addenda (if needed)
Task 7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b)
To support the City during the construction phase of the project, the Wallace Group team will provide Design Support During Construction (DSDC) under the City’s direction. While we expect the City and their Construction Management team to manage direct formal communications with the construction Contractor forces, our team will be available to attend construction meetings, assist in submittal reviews and responses to Contractor Requests for Information (RFI's), review required shop drawing submittals and provide consultation and other typical DSDC supports.
Construction Management and Construction Contractor staff are expected to maintain clean and clear records of field changes authorized by the City and deemed necessary to accommodate construction means and methods. The DSDC team will be available to assist in the preparation of “as-built” drawings based on clean and legible markups provided by the City and the construction phase staff.
This task is offered if budget allows at the end of the project construction. Due to the indeterminate nature of the coordination/support requests, this task is currently intended to proceed within the budgeted amount on a time and materials basis to the NTE amount shown for this task. If more support requests are received, they are to be authorized by the City as additional work (as/if needed).
Deliverables:
• Review and respond to material submittals
• Review and respond to RFI’s
• Perform site visits to review issues or concerns
• Prepare revisions to plan sheets or added detail drawings for construction clarifications • Assist in the determination of quantities and payment analysis for potential changes • Record drawings
951
Task 8: Public Information and Outreach
The Wallace Group team will be available to participate in public outreach events in coordination with the City's Community Relations Office. The exact nature of these events is to be determined, and we anticipate this as a topic of discussion at the project kick off meeting. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed there will be four events held over the course of the project that our team will participate in. The Wallace Group team will prepare outreach materials for community engagement which is expected to include static and video project renderings/simulations to show the layouts and operations of the roundabouts, multi-use path, crosswalks, and project features. The team will provide two (2) isometric intersection photorealistic renderings. The renderings will include selected views of the corridor at jointly agreed upon locations. The team will also provide two plan view image boards that show the design of the corridor. These materials will be the City's property to use at community meetings, school board meetings, Commission meetings, City Council meetings, and social media postings.
We have included time for key team members to attend and present at up to four in person outreach events that will be organized and lead by City staff to obtain community input, provide education, or answer questions. For each event, our Team may prepare PowerPoint presentations and/or other materials such as handouts, display boards, questionnaires, comment forms, etc.
To help facilitate the meetings, we will provide video simulations of the corridor at the El Dorado Drive and Natividad Road intersections showing ultimate and design year traffic operations.
Wallace Group will also provide image boards that include plan view renderings with planting themes along with a rendered site plan for each intersection.
Deliverables:
• Attendance at up to 4 public meetings
• 2 video simulations
• 2 isometric intersection photorealistic renderings
• 2 plan view image boards
• Various collateral items for public engagement (up to budgeted authorization) 952
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project BUDGET SUMMARY PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR SENIOR ENGINEER III SENIOR ENGINEER II ENGINEER IV ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSOCIATE ENGINEER II DIRECTOR OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SENIOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IV LANDSCAPE DESIGNER II SENIOR LAND SURVEYOR II LAND SURVEYOR II SURVEY TECHNICIAN III PARTY CHIEF* INSTRUMENT PERSON* DIRECTOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT ASSISTANT II KIMLEY-HORN EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC EMC PLANNING Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL
TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS Cost HRS LABOR COST RATE $290 $236 $232 $225 $199 $194 $184 $155 $202 $184 $168 $134 $210 $186 $160 $250 $150 $150 $140 $ $ 1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management 38 12 73 8 130 261 $71,747 $71,747
1.2 Meetings 41 20 51 14 120 $8,848 246 $69,513 $78,361
1.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis 8 320 48 40 100 516 $132,180 $132,180
1.4 Grant Support (Optional Task) 32 48 32 10 24 120 266 $63,124 $63,124 2 Preliminary Engineering Studies
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts 40 40 $12,320 $12,320
2.1.2 Intersection Operations 4 4 54 62 $17,920 $17,920
2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements 8 24 16 104 152 $36,384 $36,384
2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum 2 8 16 22 48 $12,064 $12,064
2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment 4 6 37 47 $13,730 $13,730
2.1.6 Data Collection 45 $3,770 45 $8,125 $11,895
2.1.7 Traffic Simulation 169 169 $44,825 $44,825
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings 8 40 120 437 605 $152,290 $152,290
2.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports 2 60 20 6 200 288 $57,530 $57,530
2.4 Geotechnical Recommendations 8 24 16 112 $19,960 160 $30,764 $50,724
2.5 Landscape Concept 2 4 8 18 30 60 122 $19,488 $19,488
2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis 2 2 66 70 $13,880 $13,880
2.7 Utility A Letters 2 8 16 24 50 $9,204 $9,204
2.8 Environmental Commitment Record 4 8 8 20 $4,780 $4,780 3 Surveys and Mapping
3.1 Survey Densification 12 8 8 50 100 50 50 278 $51,484 $51,484
3.2 Right of Way Engineering 5 20 40 20 20 105 $19,300 $19,300
3.3 Record of Survey 16 32 32 36 36 $2,500 152 $29,248 $31,748 4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing 4 6 24 40 2 64 64 30 30 10 $188,477 274 $51,900 $240,377
4.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters) 20 70 60 $350 150 $33,190 $33,540
4.3 Utility Agreements ("C" Letters) 4 40 40 84 $17,520 $17,520 5 Right of Way Determination 10 24 16 8 24 64 64 210 $40,900 $40,900 PHASE / TASK No.
PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx Summary Page 4 5/18/26 953
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project BUDGET SUMMARY PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR SENIOR ENGINEER III SENIOR ENGINEER II ENGINEER IV ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSOCIATE ENGINEER II DIRECTOR OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SENIOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IV LANDSCAPE DESIGNER II SENIOR LAND SURVEYOR II LAND SURVEYOR II SURVEY TECHNICIAN III PARTY CHIEF* INSTRUMENT PERSON* DIRECTOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT ASSISTANT II KIMLEY-HORN EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC EMC PLANNING Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL
TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS Cost HRS LABOR COST RATE $290 $236 $232 $225 $199 $194 $184 $155 $202 $184 $168 $134 $210 $186 $160 $250 $150 $150 $140 $ $ PHASE / TASK No.
6 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans 22 84 10 110 256 504 212 8 18 40 80 4 16 395 1,759 $344,906 $344,906
6.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 4 20 4 24 40 8 12 22 134 $30,492 $30,492
6.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate) 2 12 2 12 24 64 40 4 12 88 260 $52,074 $52,074
6.1.4 Draft SWCP 30 8 80 118 $23,656 $23,656
6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report 40 8 120 168 $33,376 $33,376
6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 8 8 16 12 48 $10,492 $10,492
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans 12 62 6 56 128 268 108 12 24 48 80 2 8 285 1,099 $212,564 $212,564
6.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 2 18 2 16 24 12 12 13 99 $22,280 $22,280
6.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 1 36 2 8 32 32 32 6 8 33 190 $38,405 $38,405
6.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 6 4 12 6 30 $6,454 $6,454
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans 4 41 4 24 84 176 52 8 18 24 50 1 4 167 657 $124,165 $124,165
6.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 1 14 2 8 12 8 12 13 70 $16,110 $16,110
6.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 1 30 2 4 8 20 16 4 8 24 117 $24,536 $24,536
6.3.4 Final SWCP 16 4 46 66 $13,168 $13,168
6.3.5 Final Drainage Report 38 8 60 106 $21,864 $21,864
6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 4 4 4 3 17 $3,835 $3,835
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a) 8 6 40 32 6 8 8 10 4 122 $27,406 $27,406
6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 40 40 240 232 210 12 24 18 100 4 $300 920 $203,220 $203,520 PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx Summary Page 5 5/18/26 954
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project BUDGET SUMMARY PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR SENIOR ENGINEER III SENIOR ENGINEER II ENGINEER IV ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSOCIATE ENGINEER II DIRECTOR OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SENIOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT III LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IV LANDSCAPE DESIGNER II SENIOR LAND SURVEYOR II LAND SURVEYOR II SURVEY TECHNICIAN III PARTY CHIEF* INSTRUMENT PERSON* DIRECTOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT ASSISTANT II KIMLEY-HORN EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC EMC PLANNING Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL
TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS Cost HRS LABOR COST RATE $290 $236 $232 $225 $199 $194 $184 $155 $202 $184 $168 $134 $210 $186 $160 $250 $150 $150 $140 $ $ PHASE / TASK No.
7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans 4 84 10 16 24 416 14 24 40 80 4 16 1586 2,318 $507,662 $507,662
7.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 20 4 8 12 8 12 46 110 $26,120 $26,120
7.1.3 60% Cost Estimate 12 2 2 6 52 4 12 154 244 $51,924 $51,924
7.1.4 Draft SWCP 30 8 80 118 $23,656 $23,656
7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report 40 8 120 168 $33,376 $33,376
7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 8 8 16 12 48 $10,492 $10,492
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans 2 62 6 8 16 224 12 32 48 88 2 8 938 1,446 $303,854 $303,854
7.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 18 2 6 8 12 12 25 83 $18,421 $18,421
7.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 36 2 2 4 20 6 8 75 153 $32,975 $32,975
7.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 6 4 12 6 30 $6,454 $6,454
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans 1 41 4 6 8 152 10 18 36 50 1 4 468 799 $166,890 $166,890
7.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 14 2 4 6 8 12 15 61 $13,631 $13,631
7.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 30 2 1 2 14 6 8 35 98 $21,092 $21,092
7.3.4 Final SWCP 16 4 46 66 $13,168 $13,168
7.3.5 Final Drainage Report 32 8 60 100 $20,448 $20,448
7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 4 4 4 3 17 $3,835 $3,835
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b) 8 6 12 8 6 8 8 30 4 90 $22,810 $22,810
7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 24 40 184 160 50 12 24 18 200 4 $600 716 $168,972 $169,572 8 Public Information and Outreach 44 36 8 18 80 300 $6,230 486 $107,920 $114,150 SUB-TOTALS 391 1167 464 1323 48 1458 3130 484 230 344 284 628 26 244 356 136 136 40 8 6466 121.5 66 $231,035 17,551 $3,776,113 $4,007,148 WALLACE GROUP LABOR COSTS $113,390 $275,412 $107,648 $297,675 $9,552 $282,852 $575,920 $75,020 $46,460 $63,296 $47,712 $84,152 $5,460 $45,384 $56,960 $34,000 $20,400 $6,000 $1,120 $2,148,413 WALLACE GROUP DIRECT COSTS $194,065
SUBCONSULTANT DIRECT COSTS $1,607,980 $41,500 $15,190 $1,664,670 DIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD @ 15% $278,810
TOTAL $4,285,958
Task Budgets may fluctuate within Overall Budget
* Designates Prevailing Wage WALLACE GROUP CORPORATE
PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx Summary Page 6 5/18/26 955
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project WALLACE GROUP CIVIL & TRANSPORTATION
PRINCIPAL
SENIOR ENGINEER III
SENIOR ENGINEER II
ENGINEER IV
ENGINEER III
ENGINEER I
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER II
PROJECT ASSISTANT II
Misc. Direct Costs
TOTAL LABOR
HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/
TASK TASK DESCRIPTION JAA HRS JLP HRS SMH HRS MJH HRS EMP HRS AE HRS TBD HRS INITIALS HRS HRS LABOR COST RATE $290 $232 $225 $199 $194 $184 $155 $140 $ $
1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management 38 73 8 119 $28,565 $28,5651.2 Meetings 41 51 $288 92 $23,365 $23,6531.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis 320 48 368 $83,792 $83,7921.4 Grant Support (Optional Task) 32 48 32 112 $26,288 $26,288 2 Preliminary Engineering Studies
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts2.1.2 Intersection Operations 4 4 8 $2,060 $2,0602.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements 8 24 16 48 $10,824 $10,8242.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum 2 8 16 26 $5,484 $5,4842.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment 4 6 10 $2,510 $2,5102.1.6 Data Collection 2.1.7 Traffic Simulation
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings 8 40 120 168 $34,600 $34,6002.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports 2 6 8 $1,930 $1,9302.4 Geotechnical Recommendations 8 24 16 48 $10,824 $10,8242.5 Landscape Concept 2 4 6 $1,480 $1,4802.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis 2 2 4 $1,030 $1,0302.7 Utility A Letters 2 8 16 24 50 $9,204 $9,2042.8 Environmental Commitment Record 4 8 12 $2,960 $2,960 3 Surveys and Mapping
3.1 Survey Densification 8 8 16 $3,352 $3,3523.2 Right of Way Engineering3.3 Record of Survey 4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing 4 24 40 $186,827 68 $14,320 $201,1474.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters) 20 70 60 $350 150 $33,190 $33,5404.3 Utility Agreements ("C" Letters) 4 40 40 84 $17,520 $17,520 5 Right of Way Determination 10 16 8 34 $8,052 $8,0526 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans 22 110 256 136 212 736 $138,678 $138,6786.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 4 24 40 68 $14,320 $14,3206.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate) 2 12 24 24 40 102 $18,552 $18,5526.1.4 Draft SWCP6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 8 12 $2,960 $2,960
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans 12 56 128 68 108 372 $70,164 $70,1646.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 2 16 24 42 $8,836 $8,8366.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 1 8 32 20 32 93 $16,938 $16,9386.2.4 Draft Final SWCP6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 4 6 $1,480 $1,480
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans 4 24 84 36 52 200 $37,540 $37,5406.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 1 8 12 21 $4,418 $4,4186.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 1 4 8 12 16 41 $7,430 $7,4306.3.4 Final SWCP6.3.5 Final Drainage Report6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 4 6 $1,480 $1,480
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a) 8 40 32 80 $17,528 $17,5286.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 40 240 232 160 $300 672 $140,048 $140,348 7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans 4 16 24 48 92 $18,248 $18,2487.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 8 12 20 $4,128 $4,1287.1.3 60% Cost Estimate 2 6 12 20 $3,822 $3,8227.1.4 Draft SWCP7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 8 12 $2,960 $2,960
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans 2 8 16 24 50 $9,900 $9,9007.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 6 8 14 $2,902 $2,9027.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 2 4 8 14 $2,698 $2,6987.2.4 Draft Final SWCP7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 4 6 $1,480 $1,480
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans 1 6 8 12 27 $5,400 $5,4007.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 4 6 10 $2,064 $2,0647.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 1 2 6 9 $1,717 $1,7177.3.4 Final SWCP7.3.5 Final Drainage Report7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 4 6 $1,480 $1,480
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b) 8 12 8 28 $6,572 $6,5727.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 24 184 160 $600 368 $79,400 $80,000 8 Public Information and Outreach 44 36 $1,550 80 $20,860 $22,410 SUBTOTALS 391 320 1323 48 1458 606 484 8 $189,915 4638 $965,353 $1,155,268 TOTALS $113,390 $74,240 $297,675 $9,552 $282,852 $111,504 $75,020 $1,120 $189,915 4638 $965,353 $1,155,268 N: PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx WG C&T Page 7 06/13/01 956
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project WG WATER RESOURCES
DIRECTOR
SENIOR ENGINEER III
ENGINEER I
Misc. Direct Costs
TOTAL LABOR
HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/
TASK TASK DESCRIPTION GCH HRS VGH HRS AE HRS HRS LABOR COST RATE $236 $232 $184 $ $
1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management 4 4 $944 $9441.2 Meetings 18 18 $4,248 $4,2481.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis1.4 Grant Support (Optional Task)
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts2.1.2 Intersection Operations2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment2.1.6 Data Collection 2.1.7 Traffic Simulation
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings2.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports 60 20 200 280 $55,600 $55,600
2.4 Geotechnical Recommendations2.5 Landscape Concept
2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis2.7 Utility A Letters2.8 Environmental Commitment Record 3 Surveys and Mapping
3.1 Survey Densification3.2 Right of Way Engineering3.3 Record of Survey 4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing4.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters) 6 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans 80 10 368 458 $88,912 $88,9126.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 20 4 24 $5,648 $5,6486.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate) 12 2 40 54 $10,656 $10,6566.1.4 Draft SWCP 30 8 80 118 $23,656 $23,6566.1.5 Draft Drainage Report 40 8 120 168 $33,376 $33,3766.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 8 16 24 $4,832 $4,832
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans 60 6 200 266 $52,352 $52,3526.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 18 2 20 $4,712 $4,7126.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 36 2 12 50 $11,168 $11,1686.2.4 Draft Final SWCP6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 6 12 18 $3,624 $3,624
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans 40 4 140 184 $36,128 $36,1286.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 14 2 16 $3,768 $3,7686.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 30 2 8 40 $9,016 $9,0166.3.4 Final SWCP 16 4 46 66 $13,168 $13,1686.3.5 Final Drainage Report 38 8 60 106 $21,864 $21,8646.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 4 8 $1,680 $1,680
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a) 6 6 12 $2,520 $2,5206.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 40 50 90 $18,640 $18,640 7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans 80 10 368 458 $88,912 $88,9127.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 20 4 24 $5,648 $5,6487.1.3 60% Cost Estimate 12 2 40 54 $10,656 $10,6567.1.4 Draft SWCP 30 8 80 118 $23,656 $23,6567.1.5 Draft Drainage Report 40 8 120 168 $33,376 $33,3767.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 8 16 24 $4,832 $4,832
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans 60 6 200 266 $52,352 $52,3527.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 18 2 20 $4,712 $4,7127.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 36 2 12 50 $11,168 $11,1687.2.4 Draft Final SWCP7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 6 12 18 $3,624 $3,624
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans 40 4 140 184 $36,128 $36,1287.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 14 2 16 $3,768 $3,7687.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 30 2 8 40 $9,016 $9,0167.3.4 Final SWCP 16 4 46 66 $13,168 $13,1687.3.5 Final Drainage Report 32 8 60 100 $20,448 $20,4487.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 4 8 $1,680 $1,680
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b) 6 6 12 $2,520 $2,5207.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 40 50 90 $18,640 $18,640 8 Public Information and Outreach
SUBTOTALS 1072 144 2524 3740 $750,816 $750,816TOTALS $252,992 $33,408 $464,416 3740 $750,816 $750,816 N: PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx WG WR Page 8 06/13/01 957
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project WALLACE GROUP LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
DIRECTOR OF LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
SENIOR LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT III
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
IV
LANDSCAPE DESIGNER II
PROJECT ASSISTANT II
Misc. Direct Costs
TOTAL LABOR
HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/
TASK TASK DESCRIPTION INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS HRS LABOR COST RATE $202 $184 $168 $134 $140 $ $
1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management1.2 Meetings 14 14 $2,828 $2,828
1.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis1.4 Grant Support (Optional Task) 10 24 34 $5,236 $5,236
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts2.1.2 Intersection Operations2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment2.1.6 Data Collection 2.1.7 Traffic Simulation
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings2.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports2.4 Geotechnical Recommendations2.5 Landscape Concept 8 18 30 60 116 $18,008 $18,008
2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis2.7 Utility A Letters2.8 Environmental Commitment Record 6 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans 8 18 40 80 146 $22,368 $22,368
6.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 8 12 20 $3,824 $3,8246.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate) 4 12 16 $3,016 $3,0166.1.4 Draft SWCP6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans 12 24 48 80 164 $25,624 $25,6246.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 12 12 24 $4,632 $4,6326.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 6 8 14 $2,684 $2,6846.2.4 Draft Final SWCP6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans 8 18 24 50 100 $15,660 $15,6606.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 8 12 20 $3,824 $3,8246.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 4 8 12 $2,280 $2,2806.3.4 Final SWCP6.3.5 Final Drainage Report6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a) 8 8 16 $3,088 $3,088
6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 12 24 18 54 $9,252 $9,252 7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans 14 24 40 80 158 $24,684 $24,6847.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 8 12 20 $3,824 $3,8247.1.3 60% Cost Estimate 4 12 16 $3,016 $3,0167.1.4 Draft SWCP7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans 12 32 48 88 180 $28,168 $28,1687.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 12 12 24 $4,632 $4,6327.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 6 8 14 $2,684 $2,6847.2.4 Draft Final SWCP7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans 10 18 36 50 114 $18,080 $18,0807.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 8 12 20 $3,824 $3,8247.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 6 8 14 $2,684 $2,6847.3.4 Final SWCP7.3.5 Final Drainage Report7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b) 8 8 16 $3,088 $3,088
7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 12 24 18 54 $9,252 $9,252 8 Public Information and Outreach 8 18 80 106 $15,360 $15,360 SUBTOTALS 230 344 284 628 1486 $241,620 $241,620
TOTALS $46,460 $63,296 $47,712 $84,152 1486 $241,620 $241,620 N: PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx WG LA Page 9 06/13/01 958
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project WALLACE GROUP SURVEY
PRINCIPAL
DIRECTOR
SENIOR LAND SURVEYOR II
LAND SURVEYOR II
SURVEY TECHNICIAN III
PARTY CHIEF*
INSTRUMENT PERSON*
PROJECT ASSISTANT II
Misc. Direct Costs
TOTAL LABOR
HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/
TASK TASK DESCRIPTION INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS HRS LABOR COST RATE $290 $236 $210 $186 $160 $250 $150 $140 $ $
1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management 8 8 $1,888 $1,8881.2 Meetings 2 2 $472 $4721.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis 8 8 $1,888 $1,8881.4 Grant Support (Optional Task) 3 Surveys and Mapping
3.1 Survey Densification 12 50 100 50 50 262 $48,132 $48,1323.2 Right of Way Engineering 5 20 40 20 20 105 $19,300 $19,3003.3 Record of Survey 16 32 32 36 36 $2,500 152 $29,248 $31,748 4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing 6 2 64 64 30 30 $1,650 196 $35,980 $37,6304.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters) 4.3 Utility Agreements ("C" Letters) 5 Right of Way Determination 24 24 64 64 176 $32,848 $32,8486 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans 4 4 16 24 $4,248 $4,2486.1.2 60% Technical Specifications6.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate)6.1.4 Draft SWCP6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans 2 2 8 12 $2,124 $2,1246.2.2 90% Technical Specifications6.2.3 90% Cost Estimate6.2.4 Draft Final SWCP6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans 1 1 4 6 $1,062 $1,0626.3.2 Final Technical Specifications6.3.3 Final Cost Estimate6.3.4 Final SWCP6.3.5 Final Drainage Report6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a)6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans 4 4 16 24 $4,248 $4,2487.1.2 60% Technical Specifications7.1.3 60% Cost Estimate7.1.4 Draft SWCP7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans 2 2 8 12 $2,124 $2,1247.2.2 90% Technical Specifications7.2.3 90% Cost Estimate7.2.4 Draft Final SWCP7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans 1 1 4 6 $1,062 $1,0627.3.2 Final Technical Specifications7.3.3 Final Cost Estimate7.3.4 Final SWCP7.3.5 Final Drainage Report7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b)7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 8 Public Information and Outreach
SUBTOTALS 95 26 244 356 136 136 $4,150 993 $184,624 $188,774TOTALS $22,420 $5,460 $45,384 $56,960 $34,000 $20,400 $4,150 993 $184,624 $188,774 N: PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx WG SURVEY Page 10 06/13/01 959
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project WALLACE GROUP CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPAL
DIRECTOR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
PROJECT ASSISTANT II
Misc. Direct Costs
TOTAL LABOR
HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/
TASK TASK DESCRIPTION INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS INITIALS HRS HRS LABOR COST RATE $290 $150 $140 $ $
1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management1.2 Meetings1.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis 40 40 $6,000 $6,000
1.4 Grant Support (Optional Task)
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts2.1.2 Intersection Operations2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment2.1.6 Data Collection 2.1.7 Traffic Simulation
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings
2.5 Landscape Concept
2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis2.7 Utility A Letters2.8 Environmental Commitment Record
3.2 Right of Way Engineering
3.3 Record of Survey
4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing
4.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters)
6 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans6.1.2 60% Technical Specifications6.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate)6.1.4 Draft SWCP6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans6.2.2 90% Technical Specifications6.2.3 90% Cost Estimate6.2.4 Draft Final SWCP6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans6.3.2 Final Technical Specifications6.3.3 Final Cost Estimate6.3.4 Final SWCP6.3.5 Final Drainage Report6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a)6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans7.1.2 60% Technical Specifications7.1.3 60% Cost Estimate7.1.4 Draft SWCP7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans7.2.2 90% Technical Specifications7.2.3 90% Cost Estimate7.2.4 Draft Final SWCP7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans7.3.2 Final Technical Specifications7.3.3 Final Cost Estimate7.3.4 Final SWCP7.3.5 Final Drainage Report7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b)7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 8 Public Information and Outreach
SUBTOTALS 40 40 $6,000 $6,000TOTALS $6,000 40 $6,000 $6,000 N: PP25-0289 Boronda Ph 2 Budget.xlsx WG CM Page 11 06/13/01 960
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project KIMLEY-HORN Analyst II Analyst III Jessica Tai Professional I Pedro Cortes Professional II Jared Calise Sr. Professional I Molly Tremblay Sr. Professional II Hunter Young Sr. Professional III Sean Houck Sr. Professional IV Frederik Venter Technical Support Project Support Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/TASK
TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS/
COST LABOR COST
RATE $175 $185.00 $220 $250 $285 $355 $395 $445 $115 $140 $ $ 1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management 100 30 130 $40,350 $40,350
1.2 Meetings 80 40 $8,560 120 $38,600 $47,160
1.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis 80 20 100 $40,500 $40,500
1.4 Grant Support (Optional Task) 40 80 120 $31,600 $31,600 2 Preliminary Engineering Studies
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts 20 8 6 6 40 $12,320 $12,320
2.1.2 Intersection Operations 30 12 8 4 54 $15,860 $15,860
2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements 40 40 12 12 104 $25,560 $25,560
2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum 10 6 6 22 $6,580 $6,580
2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment 15 12 8 2 37 $11,220 $11,220
2.1.6 Data Collection 20 5 20 $3,770 45 $8,125 $11,895
2.1.7 Traffic Simulation 100 43 20 6 169 $44,825 $44,825
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings 120 60 125 10 122 437 $117,690 $117,690
2.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports
2.4 Geotechnical Recommendations
2.5 Landscape Concept
2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis 40 24 2 66 $12,850 $12,850
2.7 Utility A Letters
2.8 Environmental Commitment Record
3.2 Right of Way Engineering
3.3 Record of Survey
4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing
4.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters)
6 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans 80 80 60 40 40 20 40 20 15 395 $90,700 $90,700
6.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 10 6 6 22 $6,700 $6,700
6.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate) 40 30 10 4 4 88 $19,850 $19,850
6.1.4 Draft SWCP
6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans 60 60 40 30 30 10 20 20 15 285 $62,300 $62,300
6.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 5 4 4 13 $4,100 $4,100
6.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 15 10 4 2 2 33 $7,615 $7,615
6.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans 40 40 20 10 15 6 6 20 10 167 $33,775 $33,775
6.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 5 4 4 13 $4,100 $4,100
6.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 10 6 4 2 2 24 $5,810 $5,810
6.3.4 Final SWCP
6.3.5 Final Drainage Report
6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a) 6 4 10 $3,290 $3,290
6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 40 20 40 100 $34,300 $34,300 7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans 300 350 250 350 170 80 66 20 1586 $371,570 $371,570
7.1.2 60% Technical Specifications 30 10 6 46 $12,520 $12,520
7.1.3 60% Cost Estimate 80 40 20 10 4 154 $34,430 $34,430
7.1.4 Draft SWCP
7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans 250 200 180 140 80 40 48 938 $211,310 $211,310
7.2.2 90% Technical Specifications 20 5 25 $6,175 $6,175
7.2.3 90% Cost Estimate 40 20 10 5 75 $16,425 $16,425
7.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans 120 100 80 80 44 20 24 468 $106,220 $106,220
7.3.2 Final Technical Specifications 10 5 15 $3,975 $3,975
7.3.3 Final Cost Estimate 20 10 5 35 $7,675 $7,675
7.3.4 Final SWCP
7.3.5 Final Drainage Report
7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b) 20 10 30 $9,650 $9,650
7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 60 80 20 40 200 $60,700 $60,700 8 Public Information and Outreach 40 80 120 20 40 $4,680 300 $71,700 $76,380 SUBTOTALS 890 1235 1150 950 1063 278 682 58 120 40 $17,010 6466 $1,590,970 $1,607,980 TOTALS $155,750 $228,475 $253,000 $237,500 $302,955 $98,690 $269,390 $25,810 $13,800 $5,600 $17,010 6466 $1,590,970 $1,607,980 1 961
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Staff Engineer Senior Engineering Geologist Principal Engineer Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/TASK
TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS
HRS/
COST LABOR COST
RATE $160.00 $220.00 $280.00 $ $
1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management
1.2 Meetings
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts
2.1.2 Intersection Operations
2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements
2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum
2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment
2.1.6 Data Collection
2.1.7 Traffic Simulation
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings
2.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports
2.4 Geotechnical Recommendations 84.5 19 8 $19,960 111.5 $19,940 $39,900
2.5 Landscape Concept
2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis
2.7 Utility A Letters
2.8 Environmental Commitment Record
3 Surveys and Mapping
3.1 Survey Densification
3.2 Right of Way Engineering
3.3 Record of Survey
4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing 10 10 $1,600 $1,600
4.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters)
4.3 Utility Agreements ("C" Letters)
5 Right of Way Determination
6 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans
6.1.2 60% Technical Specifications
6.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate)
6.1.4 Draft SWCP
6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans
6.2.2 90% Technical Specifications
6.2.3 90% Cost Estimate
6.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans
6.3.2 Final Technical Specifications
6.3.3 Final Cost Estimate
6.3.4 Final SWCP
6.3.5 Final Drainage Report
6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a)
6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a)
7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans
7.1.2 60% Technical Specifications
7.1.3 60% Cost Estimate
7.1.4 Draft SWCP
7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans
7.2.2 90% Technical Specifications
7.2.3 90% Cost Estimate
7.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans
7.3.2 Final Technical Specifications
7.3.3 Final Cost Estimate
7.3.4 Final SWCP
7.3.5 Final Drainage Report
7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b)
7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b)
8 Public Information and Outreach
SUBTOTALS 94.5 19 8 $19,960 121.5 $21,540 $41,500
TOTALS $15,120 $4,180 $2,240 $19,960 121.5 $21,540 $41,500 1 962
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Phase 2 Project EMC PLANNING EMC Planning Group Senior Principal (Staedler) EMC Planning Group Principal Biologist (Walther) EMC Planning Group Associate Biologist (Ashbach, Ghadiri, Laursen) Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL
PHASE/TASK
TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS HRS HRS
HRS/
COST LABOR COST
RATE $295.00 $245.00 $185.00 $ $
1 Project Management and Meetings
1.1 Project Management
1.2 Meetings
1.3 QA/QC and Constructability Analysis
1.4 Grant Support (Optional Task)
2.1 Concept Refinement & Traffic Operations
2.1.1 Traffic Volume Forecasts
2.1.2 Intersection Operations
2.1.3 Concept Layout Refinements
2.1.4 Design Basis Memorandum
2.1.5 Pedestrian Crossing Assessment
2.1.6 Data Collection
2.1.7 Traffic Simulation
2.2 Geometric Approval Drawings
2.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Reports
2.4 Geotechnical Recommendations
2.5 Landscape Concept
2.6 Preliminary Photometric Analysis
2.7 Utility A Letters
2.8 Environmental Commitment Record 2 2 4 8 $1,820 $1,820
3.2 Right of Way Engineering
3.3 Record of Survey
4 Utility Coordination
4.1 Potholing
4.2 Utility Notice to Owners ("B" Letters)
6 Phase 2a Package
6.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.1.1 60% Plans
6.1.2 60% Technical Specifications
6.1.3 60% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Estimate)
6.1.4 Draft SWCP
6.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
6.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 8 4 12 $2,700 $2,700
6.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.2.1 90% Plans
6.2.2 90% Technical Specifications
6.2.3 90% Cost Estimate
6.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
6.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
6.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 2 6 $1,350 $1,350
6.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2a)
6.3.1 Final Plans
6.3.2 Final Technical Specifications
6.3.3 Final Cost Estimate
6.3.4 Final SWCP
6.3.5 Final Drainage Report
6.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 1 3 $675 $675
6.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2a) 4 4 $980 $980
6.5 Construction Support (Phase 2a) 4 4 $980 $980
7 Phase 2b Package
7.1 60% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.1.1 60% Plans
7.1.2 60% Technical Specifications
7.1.3 60% Cost Estimate
7.1.4 Draft SWCP
7.1.5 Draft Drainage Report
7.1.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 8 4 12 $2,700 $2,700
7.2 90% PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.2.1 90% Plans
7.2.2 90% Technical Specifications
7.2.3 90% Cost Estimate
7.2.4 Draft Final SWCP
7.2.5 Draft Final Drainage Report
7.2.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 4 2 6 $1,350 $1,350
7.3 Final PS&E (Phase 2b)
7.3.1 Final Plans
7.3.2 Final Technical Specifications
7.3.3 Final Cost Estimate
7.3.4 Final SWCP
7.3.5 Final Drainage Report
7.3.6 Environmental Permit Coordination 2 1 3 $675 $675
7.4 Bidding Support (Phase 2b) 4 4 $980 $980
7.5 Construction Support (Phase 2b) 4 4 $980 $980
8 Public Information and Outreach
SUBTOTALS 2 46 18 66 $15,190 $15,190
TOTALS $590 $11,270 $3,330 66 $15,190 $15,190
1 963
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.salinas.gov
File #: ID#26-265, Version: 1
Acceptance of the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612.01 Approve a Resolution accepting the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612.01, for maintenance and responsibility.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 6/13/2026
powered by Legistar™964
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 16, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, P.E., L.S., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
BY: JONATHAN ESTEBAN, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
ADRIANA ROBLES, P.E., C.F.M., CITY ENGINEER
TITLE: ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY HALL GAS SERVICE
RELOCATION PROJECT, CIP NO. 9612.01
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a resolution accepting the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612, for maintenance and responsibility.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On July 1, 2025, the City went into contract with C2 Builders, Inc. for the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612.01 in the amount of $110,000. Construction began on December 12, 2025. C2 completed the project for a total amount of $126,790, including four (4) change orders of $16,790. As of April 27, 2026, the project has been completed as described within the scope of work and change orders.
BACKGROUND:
In preparation for the demolition of the former police department building located at 222 Lincoln Avenue, the City’s consultant, Cypress Engineering, prepared plans and specifications to relocate the existing gas line that ran through the former PD building into City Hall at 200 Lincoln Avenue.
The City Engineer approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the call to bids for this project. On September 30, 2025, the City received two bids from C2 Builders, Inc. and NXP Engineering. NXP Engineering’s bid was determined to be non-responsive due to not uploading the bid documents to PlanetBids before the deadline.
On October 7, 2025, City Manager approved the contract with C2 Builders, Inc. for the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612.01 in the amount of $110,000.
A total of four (4) change orders were issued for the total amount of $16,790. Table 1 provides a breakdown of all the project change orders.
965
Page | 2
Table 1. Contract Change Orders
CCO No. Amount New Contract
Amount (w/CCOs) CCO Description
1 $4,775 $114,775 Additional potholing to locate gas line 2 $1,023 $115,798 Support wall for new gas meter at request of PG&E 3 $7,516 $123,314 New gas meter cage per PG&E requirement 4 $3,476 $126,790 Restoration of concrete roadway
As of April 27, 2026, the project has been completed as described within the scope of work and change orders. City staff recommend accepting the project for maintenance and responsibility.
Attachment 1 provides a before and after photo of the Project.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
This project addresses the current City Council’s Goals of Infrastructure and Public Safety.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The Public Works Department is collaborating with Legal and Finance Departments during the procurement process.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact with this action. The contract for the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612.01, was $110,000 with a total of four (4) change orders that summed to $16,790 for a total project cost of $126,790.
966
Page | 3
Fund General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name
Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Before/After Photo
967
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CITY HALL GAS SERVICE RELOCATION PROJECT NO. 9612.01 FOR MAINTENANCE AND RESPONSIBILITY
WHEREAS, In preparation for the demolition of the former police department building located at 222 Lincoln Avenue, the City’s consultant, Cypress Engineering, prepared plans and specifications to relocate the existing gas line that runs through the former PD building into City Hall at 200 Lincoln Avenue.; and
WHEREAS, The City Engineer approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the call to bids for this project with bid submittal date of September 30, 2025.; and WHEREAS, On September 30, 2025, the City received two bids from C2 Builders, Inc. and NXP Engineering. NXP Engineering’s bid was determined to be non-responsive due to not uploading the bid documents to PlanetBids before the deadline.; and WHEREAS, On October 7, 2025, City Manager approved the contract with C2 Builders, Inc. for the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612.01 in the amount of $110,000.; and
WHEREAS, A total of four (4) change orders were issued for the total amount of $16,790.
Table 1 provides a breakdown of all the project change orders.; and WHEREAS, As of April 27, 2026, the project has been completed as described within the scope of work and change orders. City staff recommend accepting the project for maintenance and responsibility.; and
WHEREAS, The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby accepts the City Hall Gas Service Relocation Project, CIP No. 9612.01, for maintenance and responsibility.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16
th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
968
Page | 2
APPROVED:
_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
969
CITY HALL GAS
SERVICE
RELOCATION
PROJECT NO.
9612.01
BEFORE AND AFTER
PHOTOS
970
BEFORE AFTER
971
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.salinas.gov
File #: ID#26-270, Version: 1
Acceptance of the Hebbron Family Center Project
Approve a Resolution accepting the Hebbron Family Center Project for maintenance and responsibility.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 6/13/2026
powered by Legistar™972
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
DATE: JUNE 16, 2026
DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (LCS)
PUBLIC WORKS (PW)
FROM: KRISTAN LUNDQUIST, LCS DIRECTOR
DAVID JACOBS, PW DIRECTOR
TITLE: ACCEPTANCE OF THE HEBBRON FAMILY CENTER PROJECT
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion to approve a resolution accepting the Hebbron Family Center Project for maintenance and responsibility.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On March 5, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 22911 awarding a design-build contact to Diede Construction for the Hebbron Family Cener. The building permit was issued on November 14, 2025, and construction began on March 10, 2025. Diede Construction completed the project for a total amount of $10,966,708.42, including eleven change orders totaling $387,108.42. As of May 22, 2026, the project has been completed as described within the scope of work and change orders.
BACKGROUND:
On May 24, 2022, a Professional Service Agreement was entered into with Griffin Structures for Project Management services for the Hebbron Family Center.
On March 5, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 22911 awarding a contact to Diede Construction for the design-build of the Hebbron Family Cener.
Below is a timeline for the project:
August 8, 2023, demolition project was accepted.
September 23, 2023, schematic design accepted.
March 5, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 22911 awarding a contact to Diede Construction for the design-build of the Hebbron Family Cener. November 14, 2024, building permit issued.
March 10, 2025, start of construction.
January 22, 2026, Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) issued. January 31, 2026, grand opening.
April 2, 2026, building permit finalized.
973
Page | 2
May 22, 2026, Punch list items completed.
There were eleven change orders needed for the project these included:
CO # Amount Description
1 $ 43,895.00 Procurement of appliances
2 $ 4,199.00 Buried concrete
3 $ 151,511.42 Parking lot cement treatment
4 $ 26,949.00 Manhole at sewer tie-in
5 $ 2,915.00 Dedication Plaque
6 $ 4,749.00 Sidewalk repairs
7 $ 4,472.00 Pass through window (win only)
8 $ 131,048.00 Building pad soil treatment
9 $ 12,852.00 ADA ramp
10 $ 1,339.00 Window Counter
11 $ 3,179.00 IDS Keypad in Kitchen
As of May 22, 2026, the project has been completed as described within the scope of work and change orders. The project consisted of rebuilding an approximate 7,000 sq foot recreation center with two assembly areas, meeting rooms, teen lounge, industrial kitchen, outdoor courtyard, a multi-use sports court and various site improvements. The total project cost is $14.6 Million Dollars (including project management, preliminary layout, public outreach, geotechnic, surveying, labor compliance and design build) was funded by the State of California Natural Resources Agency Grant ($8.1), Community Development Block Grant Funds ($2.8 Mil), American Rescue Plan Act Funds ($3.7 Mil) and City General Fund ($160,000). The project has been deemed substantially complete and is being accepted for maintenance and responsibility.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
Categorical Exemption. The City of Salinas has determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline (Section 15300, Class 2) because it involves replacement and reconstruction of an existing structure.
No Significant Impact. The City of Salinas has determined that the project is of no significant impact under 24 CFR 58.32 – National Environmental Policy Act. No factors were found to be significant on a stand-alone basis.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
974
Page | 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
This item relates to the City Council’s Strategic Plan of Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability as well as Youth and Seniors.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The Library & Community Services, Public Works Department, and Community Development Departments have worked together to implement all phases for the Project.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact with this action. The contract for the Hebbron Family Center Project, CIP No. 9336, was $10,579,600 with a total of eleven change orders that summed to $387,108.42 for a total project cost of $10,966,708.42. Total project funding for this project is $14,623,060. With total construction coming in at $10,966,708.42, this allows us to do additional exterior improvements including a new playground and fencing at the edge of the playground.
Fund General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name
Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Resolution 22911
975
Page | 1
RESOLUTION NO. (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE HEBBRON FAMILIY CENTER PROJECT FOR
MAINTENANCE AND RESPONSIBILITY
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2024 City Council approved Resolution No. 22911 awarding a design-build contract to Diede Construction for the design build of the Hebbron Family Center; and
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2024, a building permit was issued for the construction on the Hebbron Family Center; and
WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, construction began on the Hebbron Family Center; and WHEREAS, Diede Construction completed the project with a total of eleven change orders that summed to $387,108.42 for a total project cost of $10,966,708.42; and WHEREAS, the project has been deemed substantially complete as of May 22, 2026.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council hereby accepts the Hebbron Family Center for maintenance and responsibility.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
_______________________
Dennis Donohue, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Soratos, City Clerk
976
1 RESOLUTION NO. 22911 (N.C.S.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SALINAS CITY COUNCIL AWARDING THE HEBBRON FAMILY CENTER DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT TO DIEDE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2023 the City issued a request for qualifications (“RFQ”) for The design build of the Hebbron Family Center; and
WHEREAS, qualifications where received on September 9, 2023 from seven (7) contractors; and
WHEREAS, a total of 4 contractors were selected to submit proposals for the design build project; and
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2023, a request for proposals (RFP) was issued to the four (4) qualified contractors; and
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2024, one proposal was received from Diede Construction, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the proposal was reviewed and an interviewed was conducted and it was determined that Diede Construction, Inc. met all the requirements of the RFP; and WHEREAS, in order to have adequate funds available $2,000,000 from Park Irrigation Upgrades CIP 3911.55.8191 will be moved to the Hebbron Family Center CIP 3911.55.9165.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salinas City Council, pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 12-21, in reference to The Hebbron Family Center Design Build Project contract, that the proposal from Diede Construction Inc., being qualified is hereby accepted. The subject contract agreement is hereby awarded to Diede Construction Inc. for the sum of 10,579,600.00; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $2,000,000 from Park Irrigation Upgrades CIP 3911.55.8191 will be moved to the Hebbron Family Center CIP 3911.55.9165; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of Salinas is hereby authorized to enter into the Design Build Agreement on behalf of the City.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FBEA22F-4C31-4093-A272-98A8FA1055BE 1365 977
2 PASSED AND APPROVED this 5
th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Barrera, Gonzalez, Rocha, Sandoval and Mayor Pro Tem Osornio NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember McShane and Mayor Craig
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
______________________________
Orlando Osornio, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FBEA22F-4C31-4093-A272-98A8FA1055BE 1366 978
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.salinas.gov
File #: ID#26-272, Version: 1
Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 2b (CIP 9510) - Sparling Ranch Credits Purchase Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC for the purchase of 9.7 Sparling Ranch Conservation Credits in an amount not to exceed $582,000 for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 2b.
City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 6/13/2026
powered by Legistar™979
Page | 1
CITY OF SALINAS
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 16, 2026
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: DAVID JACOBS, PE, LS, DIRECTOR
BY: JOSIE LANTACA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
ADRIANA ROBLES, PE, CFM, CITY ENGINEER
TITLE: BORONDA ROAD CONGESTION RELIEF PROJECT PHASE 2b
(CIP 9510) – SPARLING RANCH CREDITS PURCHASE
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
A motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with South Bay Conservation Resources, LLC for the purchase of 9.7 Sparling Ranch Conservation Credits in an amount not to exceed $582,000 for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 2b.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
During the environmental phase of the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project (Project), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) consulted with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for a Biological Opinion (BO) of the Project. The FWS has determined that the area of land impacted by the Project is considered a permanent loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander. The FWS issued a revised BO that contains environmental measures to minimize effects on the California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders.
The revised BO stated that the City will compensate for the permanent loss of upland California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat by purchasing credits from the Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank (Sparling Ranch). Sparling Ranch is a FWS and CDFW approved conservation bank in good standing for its credits for sale as compensation for the loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander.
A Sparling Ranch credit for muti-species costs $60,000 per credit for credit units 1 to 10. In 2024, City purchased credits for the Phase 1 and Phase 2a Projects. The required credit purchase for Phase 2b is 9.7 credits which amounts to $582,000.
BACKGROUND:
The Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project (Project) proposes to widen East Boronda Road into a four-lane roadway (two-lanes at each direction) between Dartmouth Way and Independence Boulevard, and to construct roundabouts at McKinnon Street, El Dorado Drive, Natividad Road, and Independence Boulevard. In May 2017, City Council approved the roundabout concept at the 980
Page | 2
intersections identified above along with Hemingway Drive (Resolution No. 21169). The project includes the construction of bioretention facilities, buffered bike lanes, bus pullouts, sidewalks, ADA-compliant access ramps, storm drain lines, sanitary sewer lines, street lighting, landscaping, and other improvements.
The Project is planned to be built in phases to accommodate funding availability. Phase 1 is building the McKinnon roundabout and associated improvements from east of Dartmouth Way to a point between McKinnon Street and El Dorado Drive. Phase 2 will continue the roadway widening from eastern Phase 1 limit to a point east of Natividad Road. The Phase 2 project is further divided into Phase 2a and Phase 2b. Phase 2a will build the El Dorado roundabout and its associated improvements, and Phase 2b will build the Natividad roundabout and its associated improvements. Phase 3 will continue the remainder of the Project from the eastern Phase 2 limit to a point east of Independence Boulevard, including the construction of the Independence roundabout. Phase 1 is currently in construction and currently scheduled to be completed in fall 2026. Phase 2a and 2b will begin design in summer 2026. Design and construction of future phases are contingent on funding availability and obtaining all the necessary environmental permits.
During the environmental phase of the Project, the USACE performed a site visit and claimed jurisdiction over a portion of the agricultural ditch located between McKinnon Elementary School and East Boronda Road. The USACE agreed to the City’s submitting an application for a USACE Nationwide Permit (NWP) for Phases 1 and 2 of the Project. Phase 3 will need a separate environmental permit due to its proximity and possible impacts to the Gabilan Creek. During the NWP permitting process, the USACE consulted with the US Fish and Wildlife Service for a Biological Opinion (BO). The FWS has determined that the area of land impacted by the widening of East Boronda Road, and the construction of the roundabouts is considered a permanent loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander. The FWS issued a BO that contains mitigation measures to alleviate effects to the California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders. During the BO’s review, a minor discrepancy was found on the document related to the numbering of the mitigation measures. Therefore, a revised BO was issued.
The FWS’s revised BO was then submitted to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for a consistency determination. A consistency determination (Determination) dated September 22, 2023, was issued by the CDFW. The Determination states that the Service’s incidental take statement and accompanying revised BO are consistent with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).
The revised BO stated that the City will compensate for the permanent loss of upland California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat by purchasing credits from Sparling Ranch Conservation Bank. Sparling Ranch is a FWS and CDFW approved conservation bank in good standing for its credits for sale as compensation for the loss of habitat for the California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander.
The City will need to secure compensatory mitigation for each phase of the project in advance of the beginning of each phase. The required credit purchase for each phase is as follows: Phase 1 –
4.72 credits, Phase 2a – 6.34 credits, and Phase 2b – 9.7 credits. The City will then need to submit to the FWS and CDFW a copy of the bill of sale(s) and payment receipt prior to construction of each phase of the project.
981
Page | 3
In 2024, City Council approved the purchase of 11.06 credits for the Phase 1 and Phase 2a Projects for a total of $608,300 (Resolution No. 22955). A Sparling Ranch Credit for muti-species currently costs $60,000 per credit for credit units 1 to 10. The required credit purchase for Phase 2b is 9.7 credits which amounts to $582,000.
CEQA CONSIDERATION:
The environmental impacts of the project have been analyzed in accordance with CEQA guidelines. An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the project. Based upon review of the IS, the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) have been included in the project.
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, and on November 3, 2020, the Salinas City Council adopted and approved the MND and MMRP for the project.
In addition, the following Environmental Permits have been received for Phases 1 & 2 of the Project:
A. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board):
Section 401 Permit/Water Quality Certification was issued by the Water Board in October 2021.
B. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE):
USACE Nationwide Permit (NWP) for Phases 1 & 2 was received on May 9, 2023. a. On April 24, 2023, a reinitiated Biological Opinion was issued by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, through the USACE consultation process. The reinitiated BO contains environmental measures to minimize effects to California red-legged frogs and California tiger salamanders.
b. A Consistency Determination dated September 22, 2023, was issued by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The Determination states that the Service’s incidental take statement and accompanying revised BO are consistent with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
No.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
The project addresses the City Council’s Strategic Goals of Infrastructure, Public Safety, and Economic Development.
DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:
The process of administering the environmental phase of the project involves Public Works, Community Development, Finance, and Legal Departments. Public Works Department is the lead 982
Page | 4
on this Project in close coordination with Community Development and Legal Departments in the review of the CEQA Documents. The Finance Department manages the proper disbursement of funds, and will be involved with reporting requirements of certain grants/funds.
In addition, there has been an extensive and iterative coordination effort between West Area Specific Plan and Central Area Specific Plan developers to ensure consistency with the projects.
FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
This action has no anticipated impact on the General Fund. Funding is available and appropriated.
CIP 9510 funding sources are as follows:
Fund General Ledger Number
(Operating/CIP)
General Ledger Account
Name
Remaining Budget
Appropriation
Amount Requested
1200 50.9510-66.4000 Capital Outlays –
Improvements Other than
Bldg.
$414,191 $414,191
2401 50.9510-66.4000 Capital Outlays –
Improvements Other than
Bldg.
$300,000 $167,809
Balance based on CIP reimbursement sheet, March 2026.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Sparling Ranch Purchase Agreement
Revised Biological Opinion from the US Fish and Wildlife Service Project Phasing Layout
983