392 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 227
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 117,575.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 58,787.50$
Increased Signage LS $ 2,000.00 -$ Curb Ramps 4 EA $ 15,000.00 60,000.00$ Quick Build Curb Extensions 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ NS21B 2 Red Curb (Paint) 150 LF $ 5.00 750.00$ 3 Right-in/Right-out Signage 1 LS $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ 4 Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 26 EA $ 10,000.00 262,000.00$ Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 2 EA $ 6,000.00 12,000.00$ Red Curb (Paint) 750 LF $ 5.00 3,750.00$ Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 2 EA $ 6,000.00 12,000.00$ Red Curb (Paint) 750 LF $ 5.00 3,750.00$ Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 4 EA $ 60,000.00 240,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 4 EA $ 60,000.00 240,000.00$ NS21B Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Elm Ave - Class III (Crystal Springs to San Bruno Ave W) 0.75 MI $ 50,000.00 37,500.00$ Linden Ave - Class III (Crystal Springs to San Burno Ave W) 0.75 MI $ 50,000.00 37,500.00$ Jeneven Ave - Class III (Cunningham to State Hwy 82) 0.7 MI $ 50,000.00 35,000.00$ State Highway 82 - Class IV (Crystal Springs to San Bruno W) 0.7 MI $ 250,000.00 175,000.00$
12.5% $169,000
30% $406,000
1 Assumes 2 curb ramps per quick build curb extension
2 Assumes 50LF of 8' wide sidewalk
6 San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
Decima Allen Elementary
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta. 1 7
SubTotal Items $1,352,000
Design
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $1,927,000
5a
5b
393 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 228
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 56,000.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 28,000.00$
1 Separate Walking and Driving Areas 1 LS 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2 High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 3 Sidewalk Connection (gap closure), extension, and/or widening 400 SQFT $ 35.00 14,000.00$ Raised Crosswalk 1 EA 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ R36PB Right in/Right Out Median 150 SQFT $ 35.00 5,250.00$ Raised Crosswalk 1 EA $ 55,000.00 55,000.00$ R36PB Yield Markings and Signage 1 LS $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ Parking Removal 1 LS 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ Drop-off zone signing and striping 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 7 Median Extension 300 LF $ 50.00 15,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 2 EA $ 60,000.00 120,000.00$ NS21B Red Curb (Paint) 100 LF $ 5.00 500.00$ "Removable Barrier" 1 EA $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ 9 Pavement Markings 1 LS $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 1 EA $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ Relocate Signage 1 EA $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ Bike Route Signage and Striping2 0.5 MI $ 50,000.00 25,000.00$ R34PB Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 2 EA $ 6,000.00 12,000.00$ School Entrance Redesign on 4th Ave 1 LS $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ Proposed Bicycle Facilties
E. San Bruno Ave Class IV (1st Ave to 7th Ave) 0.33 MI $ 250,000.00 82,500.00$ Angus Ave Class III (1st Ave to 7th Ave) 0.33 MI $ 50,000.00 16,500.00$ 6th Ave Class III (7th Ave to E San Bruno Ave) 0.5 MI $ 50,000.00 25,000.00$ 3rd Ave Class III (Belle Air to E San Bruno Ave) 0.5 MI $ 50,000.00 25,000.00$ 4th Ave Class III (Belle Air to E San Bruno Ave)
12.5% $80,000
30% $193,000
1 Assumes Minor C, G & Sidewalk costs, new inlet, new SD pipe, minor roadway reconstruction 2 Based on average material costs for CLIII bike route, per mile Contingency
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta.
Design
SubTotal Items
Total Cost Estimate
$643,000
$916,000
8 11
Included in Item 7
Belle Air Elementary
San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
4 5
6 10
394 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 229
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 150,700.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 75,350.00$
1 Sidewalk Connection (gap closure), extension, and/or widening 3600 SQFT $ 35.00 126,000.00 $ Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 4 EA $ 60,000.00 240,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 3 Speed Feedback Sign 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ R26 Sidewalk Connection (gap closure), extension, and/or widening 6400 SQFT $ 35.00 224,000.00 $ 6" Vertical Curb 1600 LF $ 25.00 40,000.00$ Quick Build Curb Extension 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ NS21B Curb Ramps 4 EA $ 15,000.00 60,000.00$ Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 4 EA $ 60,000.00 240,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 1 EA $ 6,000.00 6,000.00$ Quick Build Curb Extension 2 EA $ 4,000.00 8,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Quick Build Curb Extension 2 EA $ 4,000.00 8,000.00$ NS21B Curb Ramps 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ Quick Build Curb Extension 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 1 EA $ 60,000.00 60,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ Quick Build Curb Extension 2 EA $ 4,000.00 8,000.00$ Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Linden Ave Class III (Magnolia Ave to Crystal Springs) 0.67 MI $ 50,000.00 33,500.00$ Park Place Class III (Magnolia Ave to State Hwy 82) 0.1 MI $ 50,000.00 5,000.00$ Millwood Class III (Magnolia Ave to Broadway) 0.1 MI $ 50,000.00 5,000.00$ State Highway 82 Class IV (Meadow Glen to Crystal Springs) 1.25 MI $ 250,000.00 312,500.00$
12.5% $217,000
30% $520,000
1 Assumes 2 curb ramps per quick build curb extension
2 Assumes 50LF of 8' wide sidewalk
SubTotal Items $1,733,000
Design
San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
Capuchino High School
7 2
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta. 4 11
10 9
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $2,470,000
5 6
8
395 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 230
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 117,000.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 59,000.00$
Red Curb (Paint) 50 LF 5 250.00$
Median Improvements 100 LF $ 30.00 3,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 2 EA $ 3,000.00 6,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ Speed Feedback Sign 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ R26 Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 1 EA $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ 3 Street Lighting1 1 LS $ 750,000.00 750,000.00$ R01 High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 4 EA $ 15,000.00 60,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 3 EA $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ Corner Improvements 3 EA $ 85,000.00 255,000.00$ Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Sneath Lane Class III (Skyline Blvd to Riverside Dr) 0.4 MI $ 50,000.00 20,000.00$
12.5% $168,000
30% $404,000
1 Along Amador from Monterey to Sneath
* May Require extensive Traffic Signal Improvements
San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
Highlands Christian School
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta. 1 SubTotal Items $1,346,000
Design
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $1,918,000
2 4
5*
396 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 231
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 37,720.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 18,860.00$
Red Curb (Paint) 500 LF $ 5.00 2,500.00$ Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 2 EA $ 60,000.00 120,000.00$ NS21B 2 High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 3 High-Visibility Crosswalks 2 EA $ 3,000.00 6,000.00$ NS07 Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 1 EA $ 6,000.00 6,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 2 EA $ 3,000.00 6,000.00$ NS07 5 Bike Parking Area 1 LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ 6 Median Improvements 100 LF $ 30.00 3,000.00$ Parking Removal 1 LS $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ Red Curb (Paint) 250 LF $ 5.00 1,250.00$ Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 1 EA $ 60,000.00 60,000.00$ High Visibility Crosswalks 3 EA $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ 9 Street Lighting 1 LS $ 97,500.00 97,500.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 1 EA $ 6,000.00 6,000.00$ Stop Sign 1 EA $ 1,250.00 1,250.00$ Red Curb (Paint) 40 LF $ 5.00 200.00$ Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Crestmoor Dr Class III (Piedmont Dr to San Bruno Ave W) 0.9 MI $ 50,000.00 45,000.00$
12.5% $54,000
30% $130,000
San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
John Muir Elementary
1 Design
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta.
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $618,000
SubTotal Items $434,000
4 7
8 10
397 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 232
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 29,360.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 14,680.00$
Sidewalk Connection (gap closure), extension, and/or widening 180 SQFT $ 35.00 6,300.00$ Curb Ramps and Corner Improvements 1 LS $ 75,000.00 75,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ Sidewalk Connection (gap closure), extension, and/or widening 180 SQFT $ 35.00 6,300.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 Median Extension 50 LF $ 50.00 2,500.00$ Cherry Ave Class IV (San Bruno Ave W to Sneath Lane) 0.6 MI $ 250,000.00 140,000.00$ R34PB Parking Removal 1 LS $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ Red Curb (Paint) 200 LF $ 5.00 1,000.00$ Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Commodore Dr W Class III (Cherry Ave to State Hwy 82) 0.6 MI $ 50,000.00 30,000.00$
12.5% $42,000
30% $101,000
San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
El Portal and Palos Verdes Schools
1 Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta. 3 2
4 SubTotal Items $338,000
Design
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $481,000
398 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 233
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 72,000.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 36,000.00$
High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ Rebuild driveway 1 LS $ 60,000.00 60,000.00$ Fish Eye Mirror 1 EA 750.00$ 750.00$ 4 Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 4 EA $ 6,000.00 24,000.00$ 5 Bus Stop Relocation 1 EA $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ Pedestrian Path Lighting 1 LS $ 150,000.00 150,000.00$ Fence along Pedestrian path 750 LF $ 200.00 150,000.00$ Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 6 EA $ 10,000.00 60,000.00$ Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 1 EA $ 6,000.00 6,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 2 EA $ 3,000.00 6,000.00$ NS07 High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ Corner Improvements (reconstruction) 1 LS $ 50,000.00 NS21B Quick Build Curb Extensions 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ NS21B Four Way Stop 1 EA $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ NS02 High Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 Corner Improvements (reconstruction) 1 LS $ 50,000.00 NS21B Quick Build Curb Extensions 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ NS21B Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Jeneven Ave Class III (Cunningham to State Hwy 82) -$
Cunningham Way Class III (Crystal Springs to Jeneven Way) 0.35 MI $ 50,000.00 17,500.00$ Crystal Springs Class III (Cunningham Way to State Hwy 82) 0.75 MI $ 50,000.00 37,500.00$ Oak Ave Class III (Crystal Springs Rd to Jeneven Ave) 0.33 MI $ 50,000.00 16,500.00$ Desoto Way Class III (Santa Lucia to Crystal Springs Rd) 0.33 MI $ 50,000.00 16,500.00$ SubTotal Items
Design 12.5% $104,000
Contingency 30% $250,000
Cost Estimate
Alta's opinions
8 Included in Allen Elementary
$833,000
$1,187,000
6 7
8 San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
Parkside Intermediate (Middle) School
1 2
3
399 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 234
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 73,000.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 36,000.00$
Flashing Stop Signs 4 EA $ 2,500.00 10,000.00$ NS08 Stop Ahead Markings 4 EA $ 1,500.00 6,000.00$ Lighting Improvements 1 LS $ 100,000.00 100,000.00$ NS01 2 Traffic Study 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ Sidewalk Connection (gap closure), extension, and/or widening 4500 SQFT $ 35.00 157,500.00 $ High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Red Curb (Paint) 750 LF $ 5.00 3,750.00$ Parking Removal 1 LS $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ 5 Rebuild Driveway for Pedestrian Access 2 LS $ 60,000.00 120,000.00$ Traffic Study 0 EA $ 20,000.00 -$ Signal Warrant Analysis 0 EA $ 10,000.00 -$ Quick Build Curb Extensions 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07 Pavement Markings 1 LS $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ Speed Feedback Sign 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ R26 Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 2 EA $ 10,000.00 20,000.00$ Raised Crosswalk 1 EA $ 55,000.00 55,000.00$ R36PB High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 6 EA $ 15,000.00 90,000.00$ Quick Build Curb Extensions 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 3 EA $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 3 EA $ 15,000.00 45,000.00$ Quick Build Curb Extensions 4 EA $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ NS21B High-Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00$ NS07
12.5% $105,000
30% $252,000
San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
St. Robert Elementary
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta. 1 3
4 6
7 8
9 10
SubTotal Items $839,000
Design
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $1,196,000
400 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 235
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 163,800.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 81,900.00$
Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ Rapid Flashing Beacon 1 EA $ 55,000.00 63,250.00$ R37PB High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ R35PB High-Visibility Crosswalks 1 EA $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ NS07 Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ Flex Posts 1 LS $ 3,500.00 3,500.00$ Pedestrian Path Lighting 1 LS $ 150,000.00 150,000.00$ Fence along Pedestrian path 900 LF $ 200.00 180,000.00$ 4 750,000.00$ R01
Speed Feedback Sign 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00 $ R26 Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 1 EA $ 10,000.00 10,000.00 $ Striping Improvements (Road Diet) 1 LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ 6 111,250.00$
7 264,000.00$
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
20,000.00$
12.5% $236,000
30% $565,000
* RRFB cost increased due to desire for passive pedestrian detection San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
Portola Elementary
SubTotal Items $1,884,000
1*
2 3
Included in Highlands Christian Estimate
5 Included in Highlands Christian Estimate
Included in Highlands Christian Estimate
Included In Highlands Christian Estimate
Design
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $2,685,000
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta.
401 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 236
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Revised:
11/8/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 34,940.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 17,470.00$
Curb Ramps 1 EA $ 15,000.00 15,000.00 $ Yield Markings "Skark Teeth" 1 EA $ 1,500.00 1,500.00 $ Parking Removal 1 LS $ 2,500.00 2,500.00 $ Red Curb (Paint) 100 LF $ 5.00 500.00$ 3 High-Visibility Crosswalks 11 EA $ 3,000.00 33,000.00 $ NS07 4 Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 2 EA $ 10,000.00 20,000.00 $ Stop Warrant Analysis (Multi-Way) 1 EA $ 6,000.00 6,000.00 $ High Visibility Crosswalks 3 EA $ 3,000.00 9,000.00 $ Red Curb (Paint) 180 LF $ 5.00 900.00$ Quick Build Curb Extensions 3 EA $ 4,000.00 12,000.00 $ Curb Extensions (includes curb ramps) 4 EA $ 60,000.00 240,000.00 $ High Visibility Crosswalks 3 EA $ 3,000.00 9,000.00 $ Curb Ramps 8 EA $ 15,000.00 120,000.00 $ High Visibility Crosswalks 4 EA $ 3,000.00 12,000.00 $
12.5% $67,000
30% $160,000
* RRFB cost increased due to desire for passive pedestrian detection San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
Rollingwood Elementary and Monte Verde Elementary
1 2
5 6
7 Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta.
SubTotal Items $534,000
Design
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $761,000
402 of 424
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 237
ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN
San Bruno SRS
Improvement Recommendations
High Level Estimate
Date: 8/18/2022
Prepared By: SS
Reviewed By: JP
Improvement
Detail No. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST COST LRSM Code,
if applicable
Mobilization (10%) 1 LS 10% 86,725.00$
Traffic Control (5%) 1 LS 5% 43,362.50$
Red Curb (Paint) 50 LF $ 5.00 250.00$ Yield Markings "Skark Teeth" 2 EA $ 1,500.00 3,000.00$ Marked Pedestrian Path 1 LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ Curb Ramps 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ Speed Humps / Speed Cushions 2 EA $ 10,000.00 20,000.00$ Speed Feedback Sign 2 EA $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ R26 Striping Improvements (Road Diet) 1 LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ High-Visibility Crosswalks 3 EA $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ NS07 Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 1 LS $ 150,000.00 150,000.00$ NS21B LPI (Leading Pedestrian Interval) 1 EA $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ S21PB Curb Ramps 3 EA $ 15,000.00 45,000.00$ Signal Improvements (Pedestrian Signal Heads) 1 LS $ 75,000.00 75,000.00$ S17PB LPI (Leading Pedestrian Interval) 1 EA $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ S21PB 6 Street Light Improvements 1 LS $ 100,000.00 100,000.00$ Proposed Bicycle Facilities
W San Bruno Ave Class II (from Skyline to Hwy 101) 2.4 MI $ 150,000.00 360,000.00$ Shelter Creek Class III (from Whitman to W San Bruno) 0.5 MI $ 50,000.00 25,000.00$
12.5% $125,000
30% $299,000
* Signal Improvements may increase significantly based on necessary upgrades of signal poles, controller, cabinet, corners, PPB placement, etc.
Contingency
Total Cost Estimate $1,421,000
Alta's opinions of estimated construction costs are made on the basis of Altas' experience and qualifications. However, since Alta has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Alta cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from the estimates as prepared by Alta.
San Bruno Safe Routes to School (SRS)
High Level Estimate
Stratford School
1 2
Design
SubTotal Items $997,000
3 5*
4
403 of 424
Citywide
Prioritized Projects
Appendix D
404 of 424
CITYWIDE PRIORITIZED PROJECTS
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 239
School Label Improvement Detail Cost Cost Score CMF CMF Score Collision Score Total Score School Priority City Priority Belle Air 3 Install sidewalk past the crosswalk into the Lions Park parking lot. 14,000$ 4 0.12 5 5 14 High High Allen 7 Conduct a stop warrant analysis to explore the feasibility of an all‐way stop at Jenevein Ave/Cypress Ave. Review curbside use along Jenevein and extend or add red curb zones to improve visibility. 15,750$ 4 0.30 4 5 13 High High Allen 6 Conduct a stop warrant analysis to explore the feasibility of an all‐way stop at Jenevein Ave/Acacia Ave. Review curbside use along Jenevein and extend or add red curb zones to improve visibility. 15,750$ 4 0.30 4 5 13 High High Allen 4 Post “Right in only” and “Right out only” signage at the entrance and exit of the drop‐off area. 1,500$ 5 0.32 3 4 12 High High El Portal & Palos Verdes 2 Paint a high‐visibility crosswalk across the driveway. Realign the curb ramp to be parallel with the sidewalk. Install sidewalk segment to connect into school parking lot. 24,300$ 4 0.08 5 3 12 High High John Muir 4 Conduct a stop warrant analysis for all‐way stop control at Crestmoor Dr and Cambridge Ln. Install a high visibility crosswalk across Crestmoor Dr (to the north of the intersection) if an all‐way stop is warranted. 12,000$ 4 0.19 5 3 12 High High John Muir 6 Add bollards to create a hardened center line on Cambridge Ln between Crestmoor Dr and the school driveway. 3,000$ 5 0.29 4 3 12 High High Monte Verde 1 Conduct a stop warrant study to analyze the feasibility of an all‐way stop. Paint high‐visibility crosswalks across all legs of the intersection. Extend the length of the no‐parking zones. Install paint‐and‐post curb extensions 27,900$ 3 0.13 5 4 12 High High Belle Air 4 Replace existing crosswalk with raised crosswalk. Install right‐in, right‐out style directive median on 3rd Ave. 60,250$ 2 0.20 4 5 11 High High John Muir 10
Mark a high visibility crosswalk across Bryant Way on the SW leg of the intersection. Add a stop sign and stop bar for drivers on Bryant Way as they approach Crestmoor Dr, and conduct a stop warrant study to see if this location qualifies for all‐way stop control. Restrict parking on the SW side of Crestmoor up to the driveways on either side of the intersection. 10,450$ 4 0.13 5 2 11 High High
Parkside 7 Conduct a stop warrant study for intersection. If stop not warranted, install high visibility crosswalks and crosswalk warning signs. 12,000$ 4 0.19 5 2 11 High High
Saint Robert 3 Extend no ‐parking zones and paint curbs red. 6,250$ 5 0.70 1 5 11 High High Saint Robert 9 Complete a traffic study for the intersection. Options to study include: a full traffic signal or a roundabout. Install paint and post curb extensions. 46,000$ 3 0.38 3 5 11 High High Belle Air 2 Paint crosswalk across driveway entrance 3,000$ 5 0.00 0 5 10 High High Belle Air 6 Remove the row of parking on building frontage and install a permanent drop‐off zone. 7,500$ 5 0.00 0 5 10 High High Belle Air 11
Designate 4th Ave as a bike route. Increase red curb and conduct warrant study for 4‐way stops at 4th Ave/Angus Ave and 4th Ave/Pine St. Install an RRFB at 4th Ave/San Bruno Ave. Redesign sidewalk/fence entrance to school grounds. Add bike route markings
87,000$ 2 0.06 5 3 10 High High
Capuchino 7 Install 2 paint and post curb extensions. Install yellow, ladder high‐visibility crosswalk at the western approach. 11,000$ 4 0.63 1 5 10 High High John Muir 8 Conduct a stop warrant analysis to explore the feasibility of an all‐way stop. Install high visibility crosswalks and yield markings at all legs with a stop sign (existing and future, if warranted) 69,000$ 2 0.14 5 3 10 High High Portola 2 Install high visibility crosswalk. Install two curb ramps with tactile warning pads. Install flex posts to encourage Right in right out only. 36,500$ 3 0.20 4 3 10 High High
Rollingwood 2 Prohibit parking along Cottonwood Dr on the East side of the street between the school entrance and Rollingwood Dr. Paint the curb red. 3,000$ 5 0.70 1 4 10 Med High
Rollingwood 3 Install high visibility crosswalks. 9,000$ 5 0.60 1 4 10 Med High Rollingwood 6 Install speed humps along Rollingwood Dr to the east and west of Cottonwood Dr. 20,000$ 4 0.50 2 4 10 Med High Allen 3 Paint the entire southern curb of Angus Ave red – restricting parking at all times – between Elm and Linden Aves. 750$ 5 0.00 0 4 9 Med Medium Capuchino 6 Install high visibility crosswalks on all sides of the intersection. Complete a stop warrant study to consider the addition of stop signs to Broadway. Install curb extensions. 258,000$ 1 0.19 5 3 9 High Medium Capuchino 8 Install 2 paint and post curb extensions. Repaint crosswalk in higher visibility pattern. 26,000$ 3 0.63 1 5 9 High Medium Capuchino 11 Install 2 paint and post curb extensions. Straighten the right turn lanes into alignment with the street. Install yellow, ladder high‐visibility crosswalk at the western approach. 50,000$ 3 0.63 1 5 9 High Medium El Portal & Palos Verdes 3 Reduce lanes on Cherry Ave. Install high visibility crosswalks on all sides of the intersection. Consider extending the median along Cherry Ave through the crosswalk to act as a pedestrian refuge. 154,500$ 1 0.30 4 4 9 Med Medium El Portal & Palos Verdes 4 Remove parking between the driveways by painting the curb red. 3,500$ 5 0.70 1 3 9 Med Medium Highlands Christian 1
Extend the red curb/no‐parking zone on Amador Ave at Monterey Dr. Add yield ahead markings to all approaches. Harden the center median on the southern leg of Monterey Dr with bollards. Repaint crosswalks as high visibility and add two more curb ramps.
39,250$ 3 0.35 3 3 9 High Medium
John Muir 2 Install high visibility crosswalks along Crestmoor Dr to the following intersections: Rosewood Dr, Bennington Dr. 3,000$ 5 0.63 1 3 9 Med Medium John Muir 3 Install a high visibility crosswalk. 6,000$ 5 0.63 1 3 9 Med Medium Rollingwood 1 Install a curb ramp with tactile warning pad to ensure ADA access. Install yield line (shark’s teeth) markings and signage in advance of the crosswalk. 16,500$ 4 0.75 1 4 9 Low Medium Rollingwood 4 Install high visibility crosswalks. 12,000$ 4 0.63 1 4 9 Low Medium Rollingwood 5 Install high visibility crosswalks. 12,000$ 4 0.60 1 4 9 Low Medium Saint Robert 1 Install lit or flashing stop signs. On Crystal Springs Rd, heading northeast, paint “Stop Ahead” pavement markings in advance of the stop sign. Install pedestrian scale street lighting. 116,000$ 1 0.30 3 5 9 Med Medium Saint Robert 2 Complete a traffic study to determine the feasibility of closing the right turn lane. 15,000$ 4 0.00 0 5 9 Med Medium Stratford 1 Add red curb/no‐parking zones on southbound Crestmoor Dr north of the existing sidewalk. Add yield ahead markings, or "shark teeth," on Crestmoor Dr to the north and south of school driveway. 3,250$ 5 0.53 1 3 9 High Medium Allen 1 Install paint‐and‐post curb extensions at the intersection. 16,000$ 4 0.00 0 4 8 Med Medium Allen 2 Install paint‐and‐post curb extensions at the intersection. 16,000$ 4 0.00 0 4 8 Med Medium Capuchino 10 Install a concrete curb extension. Install yellow, ladder high‐visibility crosswalk at the western approach. Install curb extensions. 63,000$ 2 0.63 1 5 8 Med Medium
Capuchino 9 Install yellow, ladder high‐visibility crosswalk at the western approach. Install 4 paint and post curb extensions. 19,000$ 4 0.63 1 3 8 Med Medium
405 of 424
CITYWIDE PRIORITIZED PROJECTS
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 240
Highlands Christian 2 Add traffic calming elements to Monterey Dr, such as speed feedback signs, speed humps, or visually narrowing the travel lanes by striping the edge of the parking lanes. 25,000$ 4 0.68 1 3 8 High Medium John Muir 5 Install a secure bike parking area. 5,000$ 5 0.00 0 3 8 Med Medium John Muir 7 Remove shoulder parking on the south side of the street. Paint curb red. 3,750$ 5 0.00 0 3 8 Med Medium Parkside 4 Conduct a stop warrant study for intersection. If not warranted at this location, also consider the intersections of Maple Ave, Redwood Ave, or Donner Ave. 24,000$ 4 0.30 4 0 8 High Medium Parkside 8 Install high visibility crosswalks and paint‐and‐post curb extensions. The installation of a four‐way stop is also recommended for Cedar/Jenevein. 48,000$ 3 0.63 1 4 8 High Medium
Parkside 9 Install high visibility crosswalks and paint‐and‐post curb extensions. 28,000$ 3 0.63 1 4 8 High Medium Saint Robert 4 Extend no ‐parking zones and paint curbs red. 6,250$ 5 0.70 1 2 8 Med Medium Saint Robert 5 Extend no ‐parking zones and paint curbs red. 6,250$ 5 0.70 1 2 8 Med Medium Saint Robert 6 Extend no ‐parking zones and paint curbs red. 6,250$ 5 0.70 1 2 8 Med Medium Allen 5 Install traffic calming elements such as speed humps along Angus, Elm, and Linden Aves. 262,000$ 1 0.50 2 4 7 Low Medium Allen 8 Install high visibility crosswalks and curb extensions. Realign curb ramps and ensure the correct slope, and install tactile warning pads. 252,000$ 1 0.63 1 5 7 Low Medium Allen 9 Install 4 high visibility crosswalks and curb extensions. Realign curb ramps and ensure the correct slope, and install tactile warning pads. Conduct a stop warrant analysis. 267,000$ 1 0.63 1 5 7 Low Medium Belle Air 5 Replace existing crosswalk with raised crosswalk to slow vehicle traffic. Add yield markings and signage 57,500$ 2 0.48 2 3 7 Med Medium Belle Air 8 Install a high visibility crosswalk. Install concrete curb extensions. Repair curb ramps. Paint curb red from the crosswalk to 50 feet to the north. Add a removable barrier across the entrance to the alley 133,500$ 1 0.63 1 5 7 Med Medium Highlands Christian 3 Add traffic calming elements, such as speed feedback signs, speed humps, or visually narrowing the travel lanes by striping the edge of the parking lanes. 25,000$ 4 0.68 1 2 7 Med Medium Portola 5 Add traffic calming elements to Amador Ave, such as speed feedback signs and visually narrowing the travel lanes by striping the edge of the parking lanes. 30,000$ 3 0.68 1 3 7 Med Medium Saint Robert 10 Remove arrows and install signage to direct one‐way traffic flow at the entrance/exit of the parking lot. Paint a crosswalk across the driveways to indicate the pedestrian priority and right‐of‐way. 15,000$ 4 0.63 1 2 7 Med Medium Saint Robert 13 Install high visibility crosswalks and paint‐and‐post bulb outs/curb extensions. 73,000$ 2 0.60 1 4 7 Med Medium Stratford 2 Add a marked pedestrian pathway across the entrance of the school driveway. Add curb ramps at both ends of the path. 35,000$ 3 0.63 1 3 7 Med Medium Belle Air 10 Move the “pedestrians ahead” sign, pavement markings, and speedbump closer to the crosswalk on 3rd Ave at entrance to school property. 558,750$ 1 0.00 0 5 6 Low Low Capuchino 1 Install sidewalk along the north side of Barcelona Dr and connect it to the sidewalk along the northern side of the parking lot on school grounds. 126,000$ 1 0.12 5 0 6 Med Low Capuchino 4 On the north side of Millwood, on school property, widen sidewalks and install vertical 6” curb, instead of rollover style. This may require infringing onto school property (depending on where the right‐of‐way line is). 264,000$ 1 0.12 5 0 6 Med Low Highlands Christian 4 Install 1 high visibility crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection. Add concrete pavement to 2 corners (connect to sidewalks) and add curb ramps with warning pads. Reduce corner turning radii as much as possible. 264,000$ 1 0.60 1 4 6 Low Low John Muir 9 Add lighting to improve the visibility of pedestrians at the underpass under 280 at Whitman Way/Jenevein Ave 97,500$ 2 0.68 1 3 6 Low Low Parkside 1 Install a high ‐visibility crosswalk and curb ramps across Donner Ave. 33,000$ 3 0.63 1 2 6 Med Low Parkside 2 Install a crosswalk across Niles Ave. Ensure that the crosswalk is aligned with the west side of Redwood Ave and the East Side of Donner Ave. Install curb ramp on south side. 33,000$ 3 0.63 1 2 6 Med Low Portola 1 Move high visibility crosswalk and RRHB to crest of hill. Add passive detection to the existing RRFB. 96,250$ 2 0.63 1 3 6 Med Low Monte Verde 2 Add curb ramps and curb extensions, and update high‐visibility crosswalks. Move the existing crosswalk across Turnberry further back from St. Cloud. 249,000$ 1 0.63 1 4 6 Low Low Monte Verde 3 Add curb ramps and high visibility crosswalks. 132,000$ 1 0.63 1 4 6 Low Low Saint Robert 7 Rebuild sidewalks to be graded across the driveway entrance consistent with the sidewalk on either side, and move sloped ramp for vehicles to outside of the pedestrian path of travel. 120,000$ 1 0.00 0 5 6 Low Low Saint Robert 11 Add traffic calming elements to Oak Ave adjacent to St. Robert School. Replace the existing crosswalk with a raised crossing with high‐visibility painted markings. This will necessitate moving the crosswalk to the south. 93,000$ 2 0.44 2 2 6 Low Low Stratford 3 Add traffic calming elements to Crestmoor Dr near the school, such as speed feedback signs, speed humps, or visually narrowing the travel lanes by striping the edge of the parking lanes. 55,000$ 2 0.68 1 3 6 Med Low Stratford 6 Add lighting to the Hwy 280 underpass. 100,000$ 2 0.68 1 3 6 Med Low Belle Air 1 Use paint and flex posts or bolt‐on curbs to better indicate and separate the walking and driving areas of the roadway. 10,000$ 5 0.00 0 0 5 Low Low Capuchino 3 Install “speed feedback” along the corridor between Barcelona and Magnolia. 15,000$ 4 0.93 1 0 5 Low Low Capuchino 5 Install 4 paint and post paint and post curb extensions. Install tactile warning pads. 76,000$ 2 0.00 0 3 5 Low Low El Portal & Palos Verdes 1 On the north side of Commodore, install a depressed corner ramp and tactile warning par. Realign the curb ramp on the south side of the crosswalk to face the crosswalk. 81,300$ 2 0.00 0 3 5 Low Low Highlands Christian 5 Install high visibility crosswalks at Amador Ave/Monterey Dr and Sneath Ln/Monterey Dr. 111,250$ 1 0.63 1 3 5 Low Low Parkside 5 Move the bus stop farther east (approximately 80’) towards the intersection with Maple Ave. 8,000$ 5 0.00 0 0 5 Med Low Portola 4 Add pedestrian scale street lighting to Amador Ave. 750,000$ 1 0.68 1 3 5 Med Low Stratford 4 Provide a pedestrian crossing island on the south leg of the intersection. Enhance the existing crossings with higher visibility markings. Coordinate with CalTrans to install a Leading Pedestrian Interval. Make the crosswalk across Crestmoor raised. 164,000$ 1 0.54 1 3 5 Low Low Stratford 5 Install curb ramps on the northern half of the intersection. Install pedestrian signals at this intersection, with a Leading Pedestrian Interval. 125,000$ 1 0.82 1 3 5 Low Low
406 of 424
CITYWIDE PRIORITIZED PROJECTS
CITY OF SAN BRUNO | SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN 241
Belle Air 7 Install concrete median, continue the median down the length of the traffic loop, in front of the parking spaces. 15,000$ 4 0.00 0 0 4 Low Low Belle Air 9 Install painted arrows, cones, or other dividers to guide drivers to the correct path of vehicle travel to 7th Ave. 12,000$ 4 0.00 0 0 4 Low Low John Muir 1 Extend the length of the red curb “no‐parking” zone on either side of the crosswalk to increase visibility. Extend/add concrete curb extensions the full depth of the parking lane. 122,500$ 1 0.00 0 3 4 Low Low Parkside 6 Install lighting along path. Install fence between path and Donner Ave. Install speed bumps and traffic calming on Donner Ave. 360,000$ 1 0.68 1 2 4 Low Low Saint Robert 12 Install paint and post curb extensions. Install high‐visibility crosswalks. Adjust crosswalk on the north leg to avoid using residential driveway. 115,000$ 1 0.63 1 2 4 Low Low Portola 3 Enhance the pedestrian path by adding lighting and installing a fence between the path and drainage ditch 330,000$ 1 0.00 0 2 3 Low Low Saint Robert 8 Rebuild sidewalks to be graded across the driveway entrance consistent with the sidewalk on either side, and move sloped ramp for vehicles to outside of the pedestrian path of travel. 120,000$ 1 0.00 0 2 3 Low Low Capuchino 2 Install concrete curb extensions. Install curb ramps and tactile warning pads. Install high visibility crosswalk across Barcelona Dr. 243,000$ 1 0.63 1 0 2 Low Low
Parkside 3 Install curb ramps on both sides of the driveway. Rebuild the sidewalk so that it maintains a flat grade across the driveway.
Install a fish eye mirror that faces west. 90,750$ 2 0.00 0 0 2 Low Low
407 of 424
Safe Routes
to School Plan
408 of 424
Interoffice Memorandum
CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:January 10, 2023
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Ryan Johansen, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Update on the Parkside Intermediate School Traffic Safety and Crossing Guard
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council meeting on October 11, 2022, there was an inquiry and discussion regarding the relocation of a crossing guard from the intersection of Crystal Springs Road and Donner Avenue to the intersection of Crystal Springs Road and Oak Avenue. As was explained at that time, the impetus for this relocation was the closure of the rear entrance to Parkside Intermediate School (“Parkside”), which is located on Donner Avenue. This closure resulted in a rerouting of nearly all the pedestrian traffic that previously used the Donner intersection for travel to and from the school to the Oak intersection. This change was observed by Parkside staff, the assigned crossing guard, and San Bruno Police Traffic and School Officers.
Subsequently, the City and school staff decided that relocating the crossing guard was appropriate for optimal student safety. During the discussion at the City Council meeting, the Council expressed concern over student pedestrian safety on Niles Avenue in the area immediately in front of Parkside. The Council requested that staff investigate the possibility of adding one or more crossing guards to work the crosswalks in this area.
Crossing guard locations are determined through collaboration between the Police Department and the San Bruno Park School District. The cost of crossing guard services is included in the Police Department budget. The FY 2022-23 budget included an appropriation in the Police Department budget of $59,289.00 for crossing guard services, which are provided at three locations: Angus Avenue/El Camino Real, 3rd Avenue/San Bruno Avenue, and Crystal Springs Road/Oak Avenue.
During the discussion on October 11, 2022, the Council also expressed concerns regarding traffic congestion associated with the drop off and pick up times at Parkside Intermediate School. Police Chief Ryan Johansen explained that prior to the start of the current school year, Police Department Traffic and School Officers met with the administration at Parkside and shared an updated traffic plan aimed at improving the flow of traffic at drop off and pick up times, and the safety of pedestrians at and around the school. Chief Johansen explained that this was a standard annual practice, which had been successful in significantly improving conditions in years past. This year, the school administration indicated that they did not possess the staffing to implement the traffic plan. Chief Johansen indicated that based on recent conversations with the newly appointed Superintendent, he was confident that the school administration was open to implementing this plan now, and he agreed to have Police Department Staff reinitiate that discussion.
409 of 424
Memorandum
January 10, 2023
DISCUSSION:
Crossing guards are an effective means of enhancing student pedestrian safety along heavily trafficked routes to and from school grounds. However, it is not feasible to have crossing guards posted at all crosswalks. Therefore, it is incumbent upon school and City staff to assess needs and make the best possible use of available funds to maximize student safety. Traffic concerns associated with student drop off and pick up in the area around Parkside Intermediate School are longstanding and easily confirmed through field observation. That said, the Police Department has only three reported collisions in this area over the last eight years. Only one of those collisions involved a vehicle and a student pedestrian, and that incident was determined to be the fault of the pedestrian as the person ran into the side of a stopped vehicle while playing with other students. The remaining two incidents included a non-injury, low speed rear- end collision in the school roundabout, and a solo vehicle rollover due to a vehicle doing doughnuts in the parking lot in the late evening, outside of school hours. Police records do not indicate a significant pedestrian safety issue in this area.
As was reported in the Safe Routes to School Plan (SRTS Plan), parents or guardians of Parkside students do perceive traffic safety risks associated with their children walking or biking to school through this area. The plan identified this perception as a hindrance to increased walking and biking to Parkside, which would contribute to improved student health, and a reduction in vehicular traffic around the school. The plan includes recommendations for a variety of enhancements aimed at increasing pedestrian safety. Most of these recommendations pertain to crosswalk visibility improvements, but they also include consideration of an expanded crossing guard program.
An existing crossing guard location could be moved to the area in front of Parkside at no additional cost to the City but doing so would have a negative impact on safety at the vacated intersection. Existing contracted crossing guard services could also be expanded to add one or more crossing guards to the area around Parkside Intermediate School. Given the limited resources available to ensure student pedestrian safety throughout the city however, staff recommends that such a decision be supported by a competent needs assessment. As previously mentioned, collision data does not indicate a pressing need for the addition of crossing guard services in this area.
All of this said, there is a clear issue with traffic flow at drop off and pick up times at the school, which results in heavy traffic congestion, illegal parking, and reduced pedestrian safety. As has been demonstrated in years past, many of the causes of this traffic flow problem can be effectively mitigated with proper routing and direction provided by school staff at drop off and pick up times. The Police Department’s Traffic Sergeant and Motor Officer have met with school staff to discuss these mitigating measures, and the staff is committed to their implementation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact from this update on the Parkside Intermediate School Traffic Safety and Crossing Guard. If Council directs staff to add an additional crossing guard at a specified intersection, the approximate cost is $20,000 per year. This would require an amendment to the current budget to appropriate these funds.
410 of 424
Memorandum
January 10, 2023
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
During the study session on the SRTS Plan, the City Council may direct staff to utilize the SRTS Plan as the foundation of a competent needs assessment, and to work with the San Bruno Park School District to provide City Council in the future with competent recommendations regarding the potential relocation and/or expansion of existing crossing guard services prior to the start of next school year. Alternatively, the City Council may elect to:
1. Take no action; or
2. Direct staff to relocate one or more of the existing crossing guard serviced intersections; or
3. Direct staff to expand existing crossing guard services to one or more crosswalks around Parkside Intermediate School.
411 of 424
City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report
CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:January 10, 2023
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Trisha Ortiz, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Introduce, Read by Title Only, and Waive Further Reading of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.33 to the San Bruno Municipal Code Adopting Local Contribution Limits for City Council Elections BACKGROUND: On March 29, 2022 the City Council held a study session to consider adopting local campaign finance regulations. At that meeting, the City Council reviewed the current contribution limits of neighboring cities in San Mateo County (see attached) and subsequently expressed the desire to adopt local limits for campaign contributions to candidates for City Council.
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 571 (Stats. 2019, Ch. 556, AB 571 Mullin), beginning January 1, 2021 a state campaign contribution limit applies by default to city candidates when the city has not already enacted a contribution limit on such candidates. Along with the new campaign contribution limit, AB 571 also applied to local candidates other related provisions that formerly applied only to state level candidates.
At the March 29, 2022 meeting, the City Council was informed that adopting local limits would override the State contribution limits under AB 571, which are currently set at $4,900, and would also eliminate state law authority to carry over contributions from one election to pay expenses for a future election to the same office. Council was also informed of the need to establish penalties for violations, and the responsibility of the city to bear the cost of enforcement.
At the December 13, 2022 meeting, the City Council considered an ordinance to establish local limits for campaign contributions. Among other things, the proposed ordinance prohibited anonymous contributions in any amount. As part of its discussion, the City Council requested that staff return with an ordinance that does not impose requirements that are in addition to the existing requirements provided in the California Political Reform Act for a contribution in an amount less than $100.
DISCUSSION: Contribution limits are intended to apply to the Mayor and all Councilmembers equally and use of the term “City Council” in this report includes both the Mayor and Councilmembers.
Adopting local limits allows cities to establish an appropriate limit for the jurisdiction that still provides candidates the opportunity to raise funds that are sufficient to engage in an effective campaign. Limits can lend to greater trust and integrity in the electoral process, encourage broad-based citizen involvement, and reduce actual corruption and the appearance of impropriety from large contributions.
412 of 424
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
January 10, 2023
4 4
5 In addition to the limitation on contributions in the amount of $500, the draft Ordinance also includes limits and regulation of campaign funding in the following areas:
•Prohibiting anonymous contributions
•Written Solicitations by Candidates
•Periodic Review of Contribution Limits
•Filing of Campaign Statements in Electronic Format
•Penalties
Prohibiting Anonymous Contributions
Section 84304 of the Political Reform Act provides “No person shall make an anonymous contribution or contributions to a candidate, committee or any other person totaling one hundred dollars ($100) or more in a calendar year. An anonymous contribution of one hundred dollars ($100) or more shall not be kept by the intended recipient but instead shall be promptly paid to the Secretary of State for deposit in the General Fund of the state.” In contrast, Paragraph B of Section 2.33.030 of the draft Ordinance prohibits contributions in any amount for which the contributor’s true identity is not provided at the time the contribution is made. The draft Ordinance does not add a reporting requirement for contributions under $100.
Rather, it provides an express requirement to track the source of all contributions. It should be noted that even under Section 84211 of the Political Reform Act, there is an implicit obligation to track contributions under $100 to ensure that a candidate reports contributions from a person when the cumulative amount received from such person is $100 or more.
However, Paragraph B. of Section 2.33.030 can be removed from the draft Ordinance prior to introduction in the event that the City Council determines it does not want to add an express requirement to track contributions under $100.
Written Contribution Solicitations by Candidates
The draft Ordinance requires that a candidate or controlled committee of a candidate provide the written notice of the City’s campaign contribution limits on any written solicitation. The required language is as follows:
“NOTICE: The City of San Bruno municipal code limits the amount that a contributor may give to a candidate for the position of city councilmember. An individual contributor may not give more than $500 to any individual candidate in connection with a single election. Please read the San Bruno City Code prior to contributing to my campaign.” Periodic Review of Contribution Limits
Contribution limits do not increase annually by an index. Instead, the Ordinance provides that the contribution limits may be adjusted at any time and in the amounts that the City Council determines to be appropriate. Such an amendment would be made by adoption of an amending ordinance.
413 of 424
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
January 10, 2023
4 4
5 Filing of Campaign Statements in Electronic Format
The draft Ordinance requires electronic filing of campaign statements. The City currently uses a certified NetFile filing system for all City of San Bruno candidates. The NetFile system can also be used for filing and tracking of contribution limits. It the NetFile system is fully used, staff expects improved candidate reporting and compliance with campaign contribution rules.
Enforcement
Violations of the draft Ordinance may be prosecuted as an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $250 per violation. Also, any person who knowingly or willfully violates the Ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, and a fine of up to $1,000 per violation. In the discretion of the City Attorney, the City may impose an appropriate administrative fine not to exceed three times the amount the person unlawfully contributed or received.
In addition, the City Attorney may bring a civil suit to seek an injunction or other appropriate relief, to halt violations of the draft Ordinance. The City Attorney also may refer any alleged violations of the Ordinance or State law to the attention of the District Attorney or the Fair Political Practices Commission.
Finally, the draft Ordinance provides for a private civil action against a candidate, committee or contributor to enjoin any violations of the Ordinance, under specified conditions.
If adopted, the ordinance would apply to campaign fundraising for the November election in 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City does not anticipate a fiscal impact from routine administration of the Ordinance because such administrative functions would be performed by current staff in the City Clerk’s office. However, like other municipal code enforcement matters, bringing enforcement actions for violations requires the use of City resources, which would include staff and attorney time and expenses. Staff cannot predict the fiscal impact of these enforcement actions. The draft Ordinance includes a private right of action, which allows a resident to bring an enforcement action at no expense to the City.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no environmental impact. The action is not a project subject to CEQA. City Council’s action is not considered a “project” per CEQA Guidelines and therefore no environmental analysis is required.
RECOMMENDATION: Introduce, read by title only, and waive further reading of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.33 to the San Bruno Municipal Code Adopting Local Contribution Limits.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Introduce, read by title only, and waive further reading of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.33 to the San Bruno Municipal Code Adopting Local Contribution Limits, with Paragraph B of Section 2.33.030 deleted.
414 of 424
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
January 10, 2023
4 4
5 2. Take no action and continue to follow the State campaign contribution limits of $4,900, which also provides exceptions on recall, paying off debt, and carrying over contributions.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Limits Matrix for Cities in San Mateo County
2. Ordinance
415 of 424
29 Local Campaign Finance Regulations
CITY INDIVIDUAL LIMIT ENTITY LIMIT OTHER FEATURES
Atherton $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Belmont $500 $1,000 No assumed name or unknown sources over $250
Brisbane $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Burlingame $500 $1,000
Colma $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Daly City $4,900 $4,900 State limit
East PaloAlto $500 $500
Foster City $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Half Moon Bay $250 $500 Public reporting of contributions over $100; other regulations
Hillsborough $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Menlo Park $4,900 $4,900 State limit; public reporting of contributions over $25-$100
Millbrae $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Pacifica $4,900 $4,900 Disclosure required over $600/individual and $1,000/org.
PortolaValley $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Redwood City $1,000 $1,000 Voluntary expenditure limits San Bruno $4,900 $4,900 State limit
San Carlos $4,900 $4,900 State limit
San Mateo (city) $500 $1,000 $15K limit on loans by candidate San Mateo (county) $1,000 $1,000
South San Francisco $4,900 $4,900 State limit
Woodside $4,900 $4,900 State limit
416 of 424
1 2
6 4
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE SAN BRUNO CITY COUNCIL
ADDING CHAPTER 2.33 OF THE SAN BRUNO
MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING LOCAL CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTION LIMITS FOR CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BRUNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1:
Title 2 of the San Bruno Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter
2.33, to read as follows:
“Chapter 2.33
LIMITATIONS ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATES Sections:
2.33.010 Findings
2.33.020 Definitions
2.33.030 Limitations on Contributions
2.33.040 Aggregation of Contributions
2.33.050 Written Contribution Solicitations by Candidates
2.33.060 Candidate Campaigns Only
2.33.070 Periodic Review
2.33.080 Filing of campaign statements in electronic format
2.33.090 Penalties
2.33.100 Injunction, other court action
2.33.010 Findings
The City Council hereby finds that preserving integrity and providing transparency and openness in City elections is a matter of the highest public interest. The City’s interest in eliminating actual corruption or the appearance of corruption in City elections is a sufficiently important public interest to justify and sustain the narrowly drawn restrictions imposed in this Chapter that avoid unnecessary abridgement of Constitutionally protected associational rights. Eliminating actual corruption or the appearance of corruption in City elections by regulating certain campaign contributions over a specified dollar limit will promote public confidence in government. It is the policy of the City to promote and encourage broad-based citizen involvement in the financing of election campaigns.
2.33.020 Definitions.
Unless a particular word or phrase is otherwise specifically defined in this Chapter, or the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the definitions set forth in the
417 of 424
1 2
6 4
Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government Code Sections 81000 et seq.) shall govern the construction, meaning, and application of words and phrases used in this article.
References to particular sections of the Government Code or other statutes or laws, including references in this section, shall be deemed to include any changes to such sections, statutes or laws, including any amendments, deletions, additions, renumberings or recodifications that may occur subsequent to the enactment of this Chapter.
2.33.030 Limitations on Contributions
A. For any particular election, including an election to replace a candidate subject to recall, no person shall make, and no candidate or controlled committee of the candidate, or person acting by or on behalf of the candidate or the candidate’s controlled committee shall accept, any contribution that would cause the total amount contributed from a person to the candidate or to the committee controlled by that candidate for that election to exceed $500.
B. Contributions for which the contributor’s true identity is not provided at the time the contribution is made, in any amount, to candidates or their controlled committees are prohibited.
C.No person shall make a contribution on behalf of another or while acting as the intermediary or agent of another, without disclosing to the recipient of the contribution both the person's, intermediary's or agent's own full name and street address, occupation, and the name of the employer of person, intermediary or agent, if any, or the person's, intermediary's or agents principal place of business if the person, intermediary or agent is self-employed. The recipient of the contribution shall also be made aware of the full name and street address and occupation and the name of the employer, if any, or principal place of business, if self-employed, of the actual contributor.
D.No contributions shall be made, directly or indirectly, by any person or combination of persons acting jointly in a name other than the name by which they are identified for legal purposes, nor in the name of another person or combination of persons.
No persons shall make a contribution in their name of anything belonging to another person or received from another person on the condition that it is to be used as a contribution.
E. Any contribution or portion thereof that exceeds the limits in this section shall be deemed to have been received if the contribution or portion that exceeds the limits is not negotiated and is returned to the contributor within 14 days of receipt by the candidate, committee or the candidate or committee’s agent.
F. The limitations imposed by this section shall not apply to contributions of a candidate’s personal funds to the candidate’s own campaign, or to any loan of the candidate’s personal funds to the candidate’s own campaign. All other loans for campaign purposes shall be considered contributions and subject to the limits of this Section.
418 of 424
1 2
6 4
2.33.040 Aggregation of Contributions
Contributions shall be aggregated and subject to the limits of this Chapter pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government Code Sections 81000 et seq.) or any successor regulation on the same subject. The contributions of spouses and domestic partners shall not be aggregated, even if contributed from joint accounts.
2.33.050 Written Contribution Solicitations by Candidates and Committees A candidate or controlled committee of a candidate for the position of San Bruno City Councilmember shall provide the following written notice in at least 10 point type on the face of every written solicitation for campaign contributions, in whatever form or format made:
“NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORS: The City of San Bruno Municipal Code limits the amount that a contributor may give to a candidate for the position of city councilmember. An individual contributor may not make a contribution of more than $500 to any individual candidate in connection with a single election. Please read Chapter 2.33 of the San Bruno City Code prior to making a contribution to my campaign.”
2.33.060 Candidate Campaigns Only
The provisions of this Chapter apply to election campaigns for candidates for City elective office only. The provisions do not apply to any ballot measure, referendum or initiative election.
2.33.070 Periodic Review of Contribution Limits
The contribution limit set forth in this Chapter may be adjusted at any time by the City Council and in the amounts that the City Council determines to be appropriate by adoption of an ordinance amending this Chapter.
2.33.080 Filing of Campaign Statements in Electronic Format Whenever an elected city officer, a candidate or committee is required to file a Form 460 campaign disclosure statement under the Political Reform Act or the Regulations with the city clerk, the statement shall be filed in an electronic format prescribed by the city clerk, provided that the clerk has prescribed the format at least 60 days before the statement is due. If no format has been prescribed in a timely manner, the elected city officer, a candidate or committee shall file the statement in a format suitable for electronic scanning. Any statement, report, or other document filed electronically or online pursuant to this section need not be filed in paper format. The statement, report, or other document shall be electronically submitted no later than midnight on the established filing date.
419 of 424
1 2
6 4
2.33.090 Penalties
A. The requirements of this Chapter are in addition to the requirements of the Political Reform Act applicable to city candidates. Nothing in this article shall be deemed to exempt, or is intended to prevent, any person from complying with applicable provisions of any other laws of this state, including the Political Reform Act.
B. Except as provided in subsection C of this section, the violation of any provision of this chapter may be prosecuted as an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $250 per violation, in the discretion of the prosecutor .
C. Any person who knowingly or willfully violates the provisions of this Chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, and a fine of up to $1,000 per violation.
D. In the discretion of the City Attorney, the City may impose an appropriate administrative fine not to exceed three times the amount the person unlawfully contributed or received.
2.33.100 Injunction, other court action
In addition to all other remedies and penalties provided for violation of this Chapter, the City Attorney may bring civil suit in a court of competent jurisdiction to seek an injunction or other appropriate relief, to halt any violation of this Chapter. If the City prevails in any such civil action, the City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred and costs of such action. The City Attorney also may refer any alleged violations of this chapter or State law to the attention of the District Attorney or the Fair Political Practices Commission. Any resident of the City may bring a private action against a candidate, committee or contributor to enjoin any violations of this Chapter if the voter first provides at least 14 days’ advance notice of an alleged violation of this Chapter to the City Clerk with reasonable evidence that a violation has occurred and City Clerk either (1) notifies the voter in writing within 14 days of receipt that the City will take no action on the allegation; or (2) provides no response from the City within the 14 day period. If the City Clerk notifies the resident in writing that the City intends to take enforcement action as provided in this Chapter, the resident may not file any private lawsuit.” SECTION 2.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases e declared unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective.
420 of 424
1 2
6 4
SECTION 3
Pursuant to Government Code 36937 this ordinance relates to an election and shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
SECTION 4.
The City Clerk is directed to cause publication of this ordinance as required by law. _________________________
Rico E. Medina, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Lupita Huerta, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
_________________________
Trisha Ortiz, City Attorney
---o0o---
I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No.
________ was introduced on ____, 2022, and
adopted at a regular meeting of the San Bruno City
Council on ____, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:________________________________
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:________________________________
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:________________________________ RECUSE: COUNCILMEMBERS:________________________________ _________________________
Lupita Huerta, City Clerk
421 of 424
City Council Agenda Item
Staff Report
CITY OF SAN BRUNO
DATE:January 10, 2023
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Jovan D. Grogan, City Manager
PREPARED BY:Lupita Huerta, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Receive Report and Confirm Appointment of City Councilmembers to Serve as Representatives and Alternates to San Mateo County Agencies and Other Regional Bodies
BACKGROUND:
Each calendar year, the San Bruno City Council confirms assignment of individual Councilmember to serve as representatives to San Mateo County agencies and other regional bodies. Additionally, the City Council also confirms appointment of Councilmembers to serve on established City Council subcommittees (both standing committees and ad hoc committees) as well as liaison assignments to the City’s Advisory Commissions, Boards and Committees (CBCs). This staff report and the actions planned for January 10th address appointments to San Mateo County agencies and other regional bodies.
Appointment of Councilmembers to serve on established City Council subcommittees (both standing committees and ad hoc committees) is planned for the January 24 meeting and a discussion and decision on the future of liaison assignments to the City’s Advisory Commissions, Boards and Committees (CBCs) is anticipated to occur at a subsequent meeting in the first quarterly of the calendar year.
DISCUSSION:
As representatives on the governing board of San Mateo County public agencies and other regional boards, City Councilmembers actively participate in the formation of local policy and implementation of projects that have a region/county wide impact.
The attached matrix shows all of the county and regional agencies to which the City has an assigned representative. Some of the regional agency assignments are not made directly at the City’s discretion. These non-San Bruno appointed positions are listed separately in the attachment.
San Bruno Municipal Code section 2.04.120(A) calls for the Mayor to make all appointments to and removals from Commissions, Boards and Committees, subject to the approval of the City Council. As such, staff communicated with the Mayor and potential appointees shown in the ”2023 Proposed Representative(s)” section of the matrix were provided by the Mayor.
422 of 424
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
January 10, 2023
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The action is not a project subject to CEQA. City Council’s action is not considered a “Project” per CEQA Guidelines and therefore no further environmental analysis is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive Report and Confirm Appointment of City Councilmembers to Serve as Representatives and Alternates to San Mateo County Agencies and Other Regional Bodies ALTERNATIVES:
Do not make changes to the standing subcommittees or the City Councilmember Liaison assignments.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Matrix of San Mateo County Agencies and Other Regional Bodies
423 of 424
2023 COUNTY & REGIONAL AGENCIES
Board 2023 PROPOSED Representative(s)
Primary/Alternative
Body Requires an Alternative?
Yes/No
Association of Bay Area Governments
(ABAG) M. Medina No alt. required
Advanced Life Support – Joint Powers
Board (ALS) R. Medina / OPEN No alt. required
Airport Community Roundtable OPEN / OPEN No alt. required Airport Land-Use Committee (ALUC) T. Hamilton / R. Medina Yes, alt. required Bay Area Water Supply and
Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) T. Hamilton n /a
City/County Association of
Governments (C/CAG) M . Salazar / R. Medina Yes, alt. required Colma Creek Flood Control District OPEN No alt. required Grand Boulevard Initiative Task Force
(SamTrans) M. Salazar No alt. required
Home for All OPEN No alt. required
Housing Endowment and Regional Trust
of San Mateo County (HEART) OPEN No alt. required
League of California Cities/Peninsula
Division (Regional) OPEN No alt. required, others may attend Local Policy Maker Group (Caltrain) M. Salazar / R. Medina Yes, alt. required Peninsula Clean Energy Advisory
Committee M. Medina / OPEN Yes, alt. required
Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief
Alliance (commute.org) R. Medina / M. Medina No alt. required San Mateo County Mosquito Abatement
District (Citizen Appointment) R. Riechel
(Appointment through 12/24) n/a
San Mateo County Council of Cities R. Medina - voting representative Yes, alt. required (Vice-Mayor or Delegate)
San Mateo County Operational Area
Emergency Services Council R. Medina / M. Salazar Yes, alt. required Sea Level Rise Vulnerability
Assessment Policy Advisory Committee M. Medina / T. Hamilton Yes, alt. required Other Bodies Not Appointed by the City
Board 2022 PROPOSED Representative(s)
Primary/Alternative
Body Requires and
Alternative?
Yes/No
San Mateo County Transportation
Authority R. Medina n/a
San Trans Board of Directors R. Medina n/a
101 Express Manage Lane R. Medina / M. Salazar n/a
Legislative Committee M. Salazar n/a
Council of Cities / Selection Committee
Chair R. Medina n/a
Resource Management and Climate
Protection (RMCP) Committee OPEN n/a
ATTACHMENT 1
424 of 424