Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

San Clemente City Council
April 21, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
April 21, 2026
Body
San Clemente City Council
Pages
41
Original file
464.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on san-clemente.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

Data Collection
Fehr & Peers collected the following traffic data in support of the assessment.

Traffic Counts
Peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected on a day with fair weather while school was in session. Peak hour traffic counts are presented on Figure 2 in Appendix B. Traffic counts were collected at the following City intersections:
o Avenida Pico & El Camino Real (Signalized)
o Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real (Signalized)
o Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha (Two-Way Stop Control)
o Avenida Pico & Avenida Vista Hermosa (Signalized)
Cumulative Development Projects
Fehr & Peers requested Pending and approved development project information (within two miles of the Project) from the City of San Clemente. Projects were included in the future forecasting if they were expected to be completed and in operation by the Project’s opening year (2026).

The “Miramar Events Center” (Miramar) project that is under construction directly Southeast of the Hansen Hotel and has the greatest effect on traffic forecasting. An OC Register article1 identified the last readily available description of the Miramar’s parking situation utilized in project trip routing. As the Miramar may use existing parking southwest of Avenida Pico and Calle Deshecha, parking access is assumed to be at the northern driveway of the parking lot along Calle Deshecha and at the eastern driveway along Avenida Pico. A local news outlet2 identifies the most
readily available square footage estimates utilized to forecast vehicle trips which were incorporated into the Opening Year for analysis.

Trip Generation
Trip generation rates from Trip Generation, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers [ITE], 2021) for Hotel (ITE Code 310), Fine Dining (ITE Code 931), and Café (Public Walk-Up) (ITE Code 936) were used to represent the Project. Trip generation rates are presented in Table 1 and used 1 https://web.archive.org/web/20240313041743/https://www.ocregister.com/2017/06/14/shuttered-for-25- years-san-clementes-historic-miramar-theater-moves-closer-to-new-life-as-events-center/ 2 https://web.archive.org/web/20240525141242/https://www.picketfencemedia.com/sanclementetimes/eyeon-sc/miramar-theater-soon-up-for-sale-again/article_df009b4e-0efa-11ef-9555-03cfde1c816a.html 961
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 3 of 8 ends

to estimate the daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trips associated with the Project in Table

2. Table 1: The Hansen Hotel Trip Generation Rates
Land Use ITE Land
Use Code Units Daily Rate
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate In Out Rate In Out
Hotel 310 Rooms 7.99 0.46 56% 44% 0.59 51% 49%
Fine Dining 931 KSF 83.84 0.73 - - 7.80 67% 33%
Café (Public Walk-Up) 936 KSF - 93.08 51% 49% 32.29 50% 50% Notes:

1.KSF = 1,000 square feet

2. Sources: Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021) Table 2: Project Trip Generation Estimates
Land Use ITE Land
Use Code Units Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Hotel 310 Rooms 487 16 12 28 18 18 36
Fine Dining 931 KSF 213 2 0 2 13 7 20
Café (Public Walk-Up) 936 KSF 931 14 13 27 5 4 9
Total Trip Generation 1,631 32 25 57 36 29 65
ITE’s Fine Dining (Land Use Code 931) does not provide an AM in and out distribution, so the trips generated for the AM peak are assumed as early morning preparation and management.

Additionally, ITE’s Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through Window (Land Use Code 936) does not have a daily trip generation rate and was estimated by applying a 10% K-factor to the highest peak hour (AM) to estimate daily trips.

As presented in Table 2, the Project is expected to generate approximately 1,631 daily trips, including 57 trips (32 in/25 out) in the AM peak hour and 65 trips (36 in/29 out) in the PM peak hour.

This trip generation estimate is considered conservative as no trip internalization credits nor passby trip reductions have been applied to the trip generation, despite the project being within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) and proposing a San Clemente Trolley stop in front of the hotel. 962
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 4 of 8 ends

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Trip distribution for the project is shown on Figure 1 in Appendix B. Most trips (70%) are assumed to take Avenida Pico to the I-5 freeway for regionwide access to and from the Project. The remaining hotel guest trips are assumed to be to local destinations such as the local beaches, golf courses, restaurants and other businesses. Café and rooftop dining trips area also assumed to have a local draw along El Camino Real. Peak hour traffic forecasts are presented on Figure 2 in Appendix B.

Study Scenarios
Operations analysis was prepared for the following three scenarios:
 Existing (2024) Baseline Conditions – Consists of existing condition traffic turning movement counts collected at the study intersections based on vehicle, pedestrian and cyclist data collected on December 5th, 2024
 Opening Year (2026) Without Project Conditions – Traffic volumes were developed by applying an annual growth rate with the addition of traffic from nearby approved and pending development projects
 Opening Year (2026) With Project Conditions – Opening Year Without Project Conditions traffic volumes plus traffic generated by the proposed Project Signal Warrant Analysis
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Chapter 4C identifies nine signal warrants to guide the justification for a new traffic signal:
 Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume
 Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume
 Warrant 3: Peak Hour
 Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
 Warrant 5: School Crossing
 Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
 Warrant 7: Crash Experience
 Warrant 8: Roadway Network
 Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Many of these warrants are not applicable or data is not readily available. Additionally, eight- and four-hour vehicle volumes cannot be forecasted reliably. Fehr & Peers focused on Peak Hour signal warrant (Warrant 3) as traffic volumes can be forecasted using standard industry practices 963
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 5 of 8 ends

and it is typically the first volume-related warrant satisfied. Given the mixed-use and multimodal nature of the project vicinity, the Pedestrian Volume (Warrant 4) was also analyzed.

Per the CA MUTCD, the Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that, for a minimum of one hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) on an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. The warrant reviews total stopped time delay experienced on the minor street approach, minor-street approach volumes, and total intersection volumes. The Pedestrian Volume Warrant determines whether a major street’s traffic impedes pedestrian crossings.

As shown in the worksheets in Appendix C, neither warrants were met under the Opening Year (2026) with Project Scenario. It should be noted that pedestrian traffic counts were collected in December, which may not be reflective of peak pedestrian traffic conditions. Traffic Signal Warrant 4 requires in excess of 200 pedestrians in the peak hour to satisfy the warrant, which may only occur during the busiest of summer beach activity, and would not satisfy the typical warrant which evaluates average activity.

While signal warrants were not met, operational analysis was performed on Avenida Pico and Calle Deshecha to understand how it would operate under Opening Year (2026) With Project Conditions.

Intersection Operations Analysis
Intersection operating conditions were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to evaluate LOS at signalized intersections and the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition methodology to evaluate LOS at unsignalized intersections and turn pocket queueing capacity at signalized intersections.

ICU methodology is a standard evaluation approach and reports the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio at signalized intersections. The V/C ratio is determined by evaluating the critical movements for each intersection and comparing them to the critical movement capacity of the intersection.

The HCM 7th Edition methodology for signalized and unsignalized intersections estimates the average control delay for vehicles at the intersection. After V/C ratio and quantitative delay estimates are complete, each methodology assigns a qualitative letter grade to represent the operations of the intersection. These grades range from LOS A (minimal delay) to LOS F (excessive congestion). LOS E represents at-capacity operations. The LOS definitions are presented in Table

5. 964
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 6 of 8 ends

Table 5: LOS Definitions for Intersections
Level of
Service Description Volume-to-Capacity (V/C) Ratio
Unsignalized
Delay (Seconds)
A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length 0.000-0.600 < 10.0 B Operations with low delay occurring with good
progression and/or short cycle lengths 0.601-0.700 >10.0 to 15.0 C
Operations with average delays resulting from fair
progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear

0.701-0.800 >15.0 to 25.0
D
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of
unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable

0.801-0.900 >25.0 to 35.0
E
Operations with high delay values indicating poor
progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios.

Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences

0.901-1.000 >35.0 to 50.0
F
Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers
occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or
very long cycle lengths
Greater than 1.000 >50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022).

Fehr & Peers used Vistro traffic operations analysis software to conduct ICU analysis and Synchro for HCM analysis. Table 6 presents Existing Conditions, Table 7 presents Opening Year No Project Conditions and Table 8 presents Opening Year Plus Project results. For the HCM analysis, “Right Turn On Red” volumes were not considered to provide a conservative delay estimate. Vistro and Synchro worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

Per City guidelines, LOS D is identified as the performance threshold for the Project. As shown in the Tables below, the study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably with and without the addition of Project traffic. Therefore, no infrastructure improvements are recommended with the Project.
965
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 7 of 8 ends

Table 6: Existing No Project (2024) LOS
Intersection Control
Type Period LOS Result V/C Ratio / Delay Results
1 Avenida Pico & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.42
PM A 0.39
2 Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.21
PM A 0.20
3 Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha TWSC
AM B 11.6 s (EB)
PM B 10.5 s (EB)
4 Vista Hermosa & Avenida Pico Signal
AM A 0.33
PM A 0.32
Note: TWSC LOS Results are representative of intersection movement with the worst LOS/Delay.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Table 7: Opening Year (2026) No Project Intersection LOS Intersection Control
Type Period LOS Result V/C Ratio / Delay Results
1 Avenida Pico & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.44
PM A 0.44
2 Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.22
PM A 0.26
3 Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha TWSC
AM B 13.3 s (EB)
PM B 11.6 s (EB)
4 Vista Hermosa & Avenida Pico Signal
AM A 0.34
PM A 0.45
Note: TWSC LOS Results are representative of intersection movement with the worst LOS/Delay.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
966
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 8 of 8 ends

Table 8: Opening Year (2026) Plus Project Intersection LOS Intersection Control
Type Period LOS Result V/C Ratio / Delay Results
1 Avenida Pico & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.45
PM A 0.45
2 Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real Signal
AM A 0.23
PM A 0.27
3 Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha TWSC
AM C 16.2 s (EB)
PM C 13.9 s (EB)
4 Vista Hermosa & Avenida Pico Signal
AM A 0.34
PM A 0.45
Note: TWSC LOS Results are representative of intersection movement with the worst LOS/Delay.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025
Queueing Analysis
As the Project is near the San Clemente Metrolink Station, the Station’s major access point of Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real required queueing analysis. Synchro can determine 50th and 95th percentile queue lengths to evaluate turn pocket performance. As shown in Table 9, the intersection’s Westbound Left movement is forecast to adequately serve 95th percentile queue demand across all scenarios.

Table 9: El Camino Real and Avenida Estacion Westbound Left Queue Estimates Intersection Scenario Time
Period
Turn Pocket
Length (ft)
50th Percentile
Queue Length (ft)
95th Percentile
Queue Length (ft)
2 Avenida Estacion &
El Camino Real
Existing
AM
175
2 26
PM 1 17
OYNP
AM 3 31
PM 2 26
OYPP
AM 11 51
PM 14 49
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
967
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 9 of 8 ends

Conclusion
During Opening Year (2026) with Project conditions, all intersections performed at least at LOS C, which satisfies the city’s requirement of LOS D, and do not require additional infrastructure improvements. Forecasted Opening Year with Project volumes did not meet signal warrants for the TWSC intersection of Avenida Pico and Calle Deshecha and signalization of this intersection is not recommended. The existing westbound left turn pocket functions adequately under the forecast traffic demand and does not require extensions.

Appendices
A) Site Plan
B) Figures
C) Signal Warrant Worksheets
D) LOS and Queueing Worksheets
E) Existing Study Intersection Turning Movement Counts
F) Project Delivery Operations Memorandum
968

Appendix A: Site Plan
969
970
971
972
973
974
Appendix B: Figures
975
Figure 1
Hansen Hotel Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution/Assignment and Existing Turning Movements 3 (4) 17 (20) 5 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0) 22 (25) 0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0)
6 (7)
0 (0)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real 0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0)
3 (4)
4 (3)
22 (26)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real 0 (0) 0 (0)25 (30)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
0 (0)
17 (20)0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
22 (25)

4. Vista Hermano/Avenida Pico 26 (29) 31 (36)
0 (0)

5. Project Driveway/El Camino Real El Camino Real Avenida Pico El Camino Real Avenida Estacion Calle Deshecha Avenida Pico Avenida Pico Vista Hermano El Camino Real Project Driveway STOP
d
d
d
d
e
g
b
g
b
e
d
b
g
e
f
e
STOP
c d
0 (0)
976
Figure 2
Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations
Existing, OYNP, OYPP Scenarios 62 (40) 183 (128) 16 (21) 152 (178) 210 (360)
17 (29) 170 (241) 98 (122) 232 (310) 178 (182)
209 (268)
28 (37)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real 23 (20) 29 (19)350 (548) 19 (21)
420 (533)
21 (16)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real 11 (7) 170 (69) 38 (39) 0 (0)
11 (15)25 (48) 116 (139) 54 (82)
3 (9)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
224 (208)
289 (293)202 (296) 123 (175) 133 (284)
284 (397)

4. Vista Hermosa/Avenida Pico
379 (567)0 (0) 0 (0)
441 (549)

5. Project Driveway/El Camino Real El Camino Real Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha Avenida Pico Avenida Pico Vista Hermosa
El Camino Real El Camino Real STOP STOP
STOP ae aace
aacf ace ce
gaccb
e
d aacc
aaf ccf cc
f ce 61 (38) 168 (115) 8 (16) 145 (168)
208 (343)
14 (24) 167 (229) 76 (79) 231 (299) 177 (176)
207 (257)
16 (16)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real 19 (17) 22 (14)346 (526) 16 (17)
413 (506)
16 (8)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real 10 (6) 169 (66) 16 (25) 0 (0)
9 (13)17 (33) 88 (86) 53 (79)
2 (8)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
223 (201)
267 (270)201 (286) 120 (160) 130 (266)
259 (341)

4. Vista Hermosa/Avenida Pico El Camino Real Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha Avenida Pico Avenida Pico Vista Hermosa
El Camino Real STOP STOP
ae aace
aacf ace ce
gacc
G
b
e
d aacc
aaf ccf 65 (44) 200 (148) 21 (27) 152 (178)
210 (360)
17 (29) 192 (266) 98 (122) 232 (310) 178 (182)
215 (275)
28 (37)

1. Avenida Pico/El Camino Real 23 (20) 29 (19)350 (548) 22 (25)
424 (536)
43 (42)

2. Avenida Estacion/El Camino Real 11 (7) 170 (69) 63 (69) 0 (0)
11 (15)25 (48) 116 (139) 54 (82)
3 (9)
0 (0)

3. Avenida Pico/Calle Deshecha
224 (208)
306 (313)202 (296) 123 (175) 133 (284)
306 (422)

4. Vista Hermosa/Avenida Pico
379 (567)26 (29) 31 (36)
441 (549) El Camino Real Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha Avenida Pico Avenida Pico Vista Hermosa
El Camino Real El Camino Real STOP STOP
STOP ae aace
aacf ace ce
gacc
G
b
e
d aacc
aaf ccf cc
f ce Project Driveway

5. Project Driveway/El Camino Real Project Driveway
Existing
Opening Year No Project
Opening Year Plus Project
G
977
Appendix C: Signal Warrant
Worksheets
978
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 10 0 63 0 x North/South
Through 170 116 0 3 East/West
Right 0 25 11 54
Total 180 141 74 57
Intersection Geometry
1 4

16.87 Approach with Worst Case Delay WB
57 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
OYPP
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.3 74 452
4 100 800
979
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 10 0 63 0 x North/South
Through 170 116 0 3 East/West
Right 0 25 11 54
Total 180 141 74 57
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 321 74
Major Street Minor Street Warrant Met Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha 0 100
200
300
400
500
600
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
100*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
980
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 7 0 69 0 x North/South
Through 69 139 0 9 East/West
Right 0 48 15 82
Total 76 187 84 91
Intersection Geometry
1 4

13.87 Approach with Worst Case Delay WB
91 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
91 438
4 100 800
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
OYPP
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?

0.4 981
Project Hansen Hotel
Major Street Avenida Pico Scenario OYPP
Minor Street Calle Deshecha Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 7 0 69 0 x North/South
Through 69 139 0 9 East/West
Right 0 48 15 82
Total 76 187 84 91
Major Street Minor Street Warrant Met Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 263 91
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
100*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
982

OYPP AM & PM
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
250 350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750

TOTAL OF ALL

PEDESTRAINS

CROSSING

MAJOR STREET -

PEDESTRIANS

PER HOUR (PPH)

MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)…
*Note: 133 pph applies as the lower threshold volume.

Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour Existing
983
Appendix D: LOS and Queueing
Worksheets
984
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICUexgAM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 1 Exg_AM V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

Signalized ICU 1 SB Right 0.330 - A
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.206 - A
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.418 - A
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
985
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.418
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Avenida Pico and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 275.00 100.00 325.00 275.00 100.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 4 5 2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7 2 9 1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 69 189 9 260 85 188 163 234 16 18 233 199 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 17 47 2 65 21 47 41 58 4 4 58 50 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 61 168 8 231 76 167 145 208 14 16 207 177 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 61 168 8 231 76 167 145 208 14 16 207 177 Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
986
Intersection V/C 0.418
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.13 0.13 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 4,5
Signal Group 0 3 0 0 4 5 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
987
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.206
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 15.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 4 0 5
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 20 24 372 17 17 444
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 6 93 4 4 111
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19 22 346 16 16 413
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 19 22 346 16 16 413
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
988
Intersection V/C 0.206
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.13
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 8 0 2 0 1 6
Control Type Split Split Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
989
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.330
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Vista Hermosa and Avenida Pico
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 275.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 2 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 129 216 240 287 278 140
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 32 54 60 72 70 35
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 120 201 223 267 259 130
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 120 201 223 267 259 130
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
990
Intersection V/C 0.330
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.13 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 4 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
991
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICUexgAM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 1 Exg_AM 1200
Total
Volume
130
Right
259
Thru
Westbound
267
Thru
223
Left
Eastbound
201
Right
120
Left
Southbound
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
ID Intersection Name
832
Total
Volume
413
Thru
16 Left
Westbound
16 Right
346
Thru
Eastbound
22 Right
19 Left
Northbound
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
ID Intersection Name
1478
Total
Volume
177
Right
207
Thru
16 Left
Westbound
14 Right
208
Thru
145
Left
Eastbound
167
Right
76 Thru
231
Left
Southbound
8 Right
168
Thru
61 Left
Northbound
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
992
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: C:\...\ICUexgAM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 1 Exg_AM 1200
0 0
0 -
1200
Total
Volume
130
0 0
0 1.00
130
Right
259
0 0
0 1.00
259
Thru
Westbound
267
0 0
0 1.00
267
Thru
223
0 0
0 1.00
223
Left
Eastbound
201
0 0
0 1.00
201
Right
120
0 0
0 1.00
120
Left
Southbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Vista Hermosa
and Avenida
Pico
4 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
832
0 0
0 -
832
Total
Volume
413
0 0
0 1.00
413
Thru
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Left
Westbound
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Right
346
0 0
0 1.00
346
Thru
Eastbound
22 0
0 0

1.00 22
Right
19 0
0 0

1.00 19
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida
Estacion and El
Camino Real
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1478
0 0
0 -
1478
Total
Volume
177
0 0
0 1.00
177
Right
207
0 0
0 1.00
207
Thru
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Left
Westbound
14 0
0 0

1.00 14
Right
208
0 0
0 1.00
208
Thru
145
0 0
0 1.00
145
Left
Eastbound
167
0 0
0 1.00
167
Right
76 0
0 0

1.00 76
Thru
231
0 0
0 1.00
231
Left
Southbound
8 0
0 0

1.00 8
Right
168
0 0
0 1.00
168
Thru
61 0
0 0

1.00 61
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida Pico
and El Camino
Real
1 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
993
Study Intersections
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
994
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
995
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
996
Traffic Volume - In-Process Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
997
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
998
Traffic Volume - Other Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
999
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1000
Traffic Conditions
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1001
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICUexgPM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 2 Exg_PM V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

Signalized ICU 1 SB Right 0.321 - A
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.203 - A
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Right 0.394 - A
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1002
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.394
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Avenida Pico and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 275.00 100.00 325.00 275.00 100.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 2 2 2 1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3 1 2 9
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 64 177 8 243 80 176 153 219 15 17 218 186 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 16 44 2 61 20 44 38 55 4 4 54 47 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 61 168 8 231 76 167 145 208 14 16 207 177 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 61 168 8 231 76 167 145 208 14 16 207 177 Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1003
Intersection V/C 0.394
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.12 0.12 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 4,5
Signal Group 0 3 0 0 4 5 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1004
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.203
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 15.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5 0 2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 20 23 364 17 17 435
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 6 91 4 4 109
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19 22 346 16 16 413
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 19 22 346 16 16 413
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1005
Intersection V/C 0.203
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.13
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 8 0 2 0 1 6
Control Type Split Split Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1006
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.321
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Vista Hermosa and Avenida Pico
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 275.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 125 209 232 278 270 135
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 31 52 58 70 67 34
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 120 201 223 267 259 130
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 120 201 223 267 259 130
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1007
Intersection V/C 0.321
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.12 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 4 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1008
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICUexgPM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 2 Exg_PM 1200
Total
Volume
130
Right
259
Thru
Westbound
267
Thru
223
Left
Eastbound
201
Right
120
Left
Southbound
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
ID Intersection Name
832
Total
Volume
413
Thru
16 Left
Westbound
16 Right
346
Thru
Eastbound
22 Right
19 Left
Northbound
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
ID Intersection Name
1478
Total
Volume
177
Right
207
Thru
16 Left
Westbound
14 Right
208
Thru
145
Left
Eastbound
167
Right
76 Thru
231
Left
Southbound
8 Right
168
Thru
61 Left
Northbound
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1009
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: C:\...\ICUexgPM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 2 Exg_PM 1200
0 0
0 -
1200
Total
Volume
130
0 0
0 1.00
130
Right
259
0 0
0 1.00
259
Thru
Westbound
267
0 0
0 1.00
267
Thru
223
0 0
0 1.00
223
Left
Eastbound
201
0 0
0 1.00
201
Right
120
0 0
0 1.00
120
Left
Southbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Vista Hermosa
and Avenida
Pico
4 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
832
0 0
0 -
832
Total
Volume
413
0 0
0 1.00
413
Thru
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Left
Westbound
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Right
346
0 0
0 1.00
346
Thru
Eastbound
22 0
0 0

1.00 22
Right
19 0
0 0

1.00 19
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida
Estacion and El
Camino Real
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1478
0 0
0 -
1478
Total
Volume
177
0 0
0 1.00
177
Right
207
0 0
0 1.00
207
Thru
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Left
Westbound
14 0
0 0

1.00 14
Right
208
0 0
0 1.00
208
Thru
145
0 0
0 1.00
145
Left
Eastbound
167
0 0
0 1.00
167
Right
76 0
0 0

1.00 76
Thru
231
0 0
0 1.00
231
Left
Southbound
8 0
0 0

1.00 8
Right
168
0 0
0 1.00
168
Thru
61 0
0 0

1.00 61
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida Pico
and El Camino
Real
1 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1010
Study Intersections
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1011
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1012
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1013
Traffic Volume - In-Process Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1014
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1015
Traffic Volume - Other Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1016
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1017
Traffic Conditions
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1018
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYNP_AM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 3 OYNP_AM V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

Signalized ICU 1 SB Right 0.336 - A
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.215 - A
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
Signalized ICU 1 NB Thru 0.435 - A
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1019
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.435
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Avenida Pico and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 275.00 100.00 325.00 275.00 100.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 4 5 2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7 2 9 1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 72 208 15 260 85 212 163 234 16 18 239 199 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 18 52 4 65 21 53 41 58 4 4 60 50 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 64 185 13 231 76 189 145 208 14 16 213 177 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 64 185 13 231 76 189 145 208 14 16 213 177 Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1020
Intersection V/C 0.435
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.13 0.13 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 4,5
Signal Group 0 3 0 0 4 5 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1021
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.215
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 15.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 4 0 5
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 20 24 372 20 41 448
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 6 93 5 10 112
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19 22 346 19 38 417
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 19 22 346 19 38 417
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1022
Intersection V/C 0.215
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.13
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 8 0 2 0 1 6
Control Type Split Split Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1023
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.336
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Vista Hermosa and Avenida Pico
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 275.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 2 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 129 216 240 305 302 140
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 32 54 60 76 76 35
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 120 201 223 284 281 130
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 120 201 223 284 281 130
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1024
Intersection V/C 0.336
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.13 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.08
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 4 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1025
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYNP_AM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 3 OYNP_AM 1239
Total
Volume
130
Right
281
Thru
Westbound
284
Thru
223
Left
Eastbound
201
Right
120
Left
Southbound
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
ID Intersection Name
861
Total
Volume
417
Thru
38 Left
Westbound
19 Right
346
Thru
Eastbound
22 Right
19 Left
Northbound
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
ID Intersection Name
1531
Total
Volume
177
Right
213
Thru
16 Left
Westbound
14 Right
208
Thru
145
Left
Eastbound
189
Right
76 Thru
231
Left
Southbound
13 Right
185
Thru
64 Left
Northbound
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1026
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYNP_AM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 3 OYNP_AM 1239
0 0
0 -
1239
Total
Volume
130
0 0
0 1.00
130
Right
281
0 0
0 1.00
281
Thru
Westbound
284
0 0
0 1.00
284
Thru
223
0 0
0 1.00
223
Left
Eastbound
201
0 0
0 1.00
201
Right
120
0 0
0 1.00
120
Left
Southbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Vista Hermosa
and Avenida
Pico
4 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
861
0 0
0 -
861
Total
Volume
417
0 0
0 1.00
417
Thru
38 0
0 0

1.00 38
Left
Westbound
19 0
0 0

1.00 19
Right
346
0 0
0 1.00
346
Thru
Eastbound
22 0
0 0

1.00 22
Right
19 0
0 0

1.00 19
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida
Estacion and El
Camino Real
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1531
0 0
0 -
1531
Total
Volume
177
0 0
0 1.00
177
Right
213
0 0
0 1.00
213
Thru
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Left
Westbound
14 0
0 0

1.00 14
Right
208
0 0
0 1.00
208
Thru
145
0 0
0 1.00
145
Left
Eastbound
189
0 0
0 1.00
189
Right
76 0
0 0

1.00 76
Thru
231
0 0
0 1.00
231
Left
Southbound
13 0
0 0

1.00 13
Right
185
0 0
0 1.00
185
Thru
64 0
0 0

1.00 64
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida Pico
and El Camino
Real
1 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1027
Study Intersections
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1028
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1029
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1030
Traffic Volume - In-Process Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1031
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1032
Traffic Volume - Other Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1033
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1034
Traffic Conditions
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1035
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYNP_PM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 4 OYNP_PM V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

Signalized ICU 1 SB Right 0.450 - A
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
Signalized ICU 1 EB Thru 0.260 - A
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.440 - A
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1036
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.440
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Avenida Pico and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 275.00 100.00 325.00 275.00 100.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 2 2 2 1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3 1 2 9
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 44 142 23 315 83 267 177 361 25 17 278 185 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 11 36 6 79 21 67 44 90 6 4 69 46 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 42 135 22 299 79 254 168 343 24 16 264 176 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 42 135 22 299 79 254 168 343 24 16 264 176 Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1037
Intersection V/C 0.440
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.05 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.14 0.14 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 4,5
Signal Group 0 3 0 0 4 5 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1038
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.260
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 15.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5 0 2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 18 15 554 22 36 536
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 4 138 6 9 134
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 17 14 526 21 34 509
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 17 14 526 21 34 509
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1039
Intersection V/C 0.260
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.16
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 8 0 2 0 1 6
Control Type Split Split Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1040
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.450
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Vista Hermosa and Avenida Pico
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 275.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 167 298 209 302 381 277
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 42 74 52 76 95 69
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 160 286 201 290 366 266
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 160 286 201 290 366 266
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1041
Intersection V/C 0.450
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.18 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.16
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 4 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1042
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYNP_PM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 4 OYNP_PM 1569
Total
Volume
266
Right
366
Thru
Westbound
290
Thru
201
Left
Eastbound
286
Right
160
Left
Southbound
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
ID Intersection Name
1121
Total
Volume
509
Thru
34 Left
Westbound
21 Right
526
Thru
Eastbound
14 Right
17 Left
Northbound
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
ID Intersection Name
1822
Total
Volume
176
Right
264
Thru
16 Left
Westbound
24 Right
343
Thru
168
Left
Eastbound
254
Right
79 Thru
299
Left
Southbound
22 Right
135
Thru
42 Left
Northbound
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1043
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYNP_PM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 4 OYNP_PM 1569
0 0
0 -
1569
Total
Volume
266
0 0
0 1.00
266
Right
366
0 0
0 1.00
366
Thru
Westbound
290
0 0
0 1.00
290
Thru
201
0 0
0 1.00
201
Left
Eastbound
286
0 0
0 1.00
286
Right
160
0 0
0 1.00
160
Left
Southbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Vista Hermosa
and Avenida
Pico
4 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1121
0 0
0 -
1121
Total
Volume
509
0 0
0 1.00
509
Thru
34 0
0 0

1.00 34
Left
Westbound
21 0
0 0

1.00 21
Right
526
0 0
0 1.00
526
Thru
Eastbound
14 0
0 0

1.00 14
Right
17 0
0 0

1.00 17
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida
Estacion and El
Camino Real
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1822
0 0
0 -
1822
Total
Volume
176
0 0
0 1.00
176
Right
264
0 0
0 1.00
264
Thru
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Left
Westbound
24 0
0 0

1.00 24
Right
343
0 0
0 1.00
343
Thru
168
0 0
0 1.00
168
Left
Eastbound
254
0 0
0 1.00
254
Right
79 0
0 0

1.00 79
Thru
299
0 0
0 1.00
299
Left
Southbound
22 0
0 0

1.00 22
Right
135
0 0
0 1.00
135
Thru
42 0
0 0

1.00 42
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida Pico
and El Camino
Real
1 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1044
Study Intersections
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1045
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1046
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1047
Traffic Volume - In-Process Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1048
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1049
Traffic Volume - Other Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1050
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1051
Traffic Conditions
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1052
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYPP_AM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 5 OYPP_AM V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

Signalized ICU 1 SB Right 0.344 - A
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.225 - A
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
Signalized ICU 1 NB Thru 0.450 - A
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1053
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.450
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Avenida Pico and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 275.00 100.00 325.00 275.00 100.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 4 5 2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7 2 9 1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 72 224 22 260 109 215 170 234 18 30 240 199 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 18 56 6 65 27 54 42 58 4 8 60 50 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 64 199 20 231 97 191 151 208 16 27 214 177 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 64 199 20 231 97 191 151 208 16 27 214 177 Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1054
Intersection V/C 0.450
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.13 0.13 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 4,5
Signal Group 0 3 0 0 4 5 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1055
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.225
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 15.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 4 0 5
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 24 30 374 23 45 448
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 8 94 6 11 112
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 22 28 348 21 42 417
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 22 28 348 21 42 417
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1056
Intersection V/C 0.225
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.13
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 8 0 2 0 1 6
Control Type Split Split Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1057
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.344
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Vista Hermosa and Avenida Pico
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 275.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 2 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 129 216 240 327 327 140
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 32 54 60 82 82 35
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 120 201 223 304 304 130
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 120 201 223 304 304 130
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1058
Intersection V/C 0.344
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.13 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.08
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 4 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1059
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYPP_AM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 5 OYPP_AM 1282
Total
Volume
130
Right
304
Thru
Westbound
304
Thru
223
Left
Eastbound
201
Right
120
Left
Southbound
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
ID Intersection Name
878
Total
Volume
417
Thru
42 Left
Westbound
21 Right
348
Thru
Eastbound
28 Right
22 Left
Northbound
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
ID Intersection Name
1595
Total
Volume
177
Right
214
Thru
27 Left
Westbound
16 Right
208
Thru
151
Left
Eastbound
191
Right
97 Thru
231
Left
Southbound
20 Right
199
Thru
64 Left
Northbound
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1060
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYPP_AM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 5 OYPP_AM 1282
0 0
0 -
1282
Total
Volume
130
0 0
0 1.00
130
Right
304
0 0
0 1.00
304
Thru
Westbound
304
0 0
0 1.00
304
Thru
223
0 0
0 1.00
223
Left
Eastbound
201
0 0
0 1.00
201
Right
120
0 0
0 1.00
120
Left
Southbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Vista Hermosa
and Avenida
Pico
4 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
878
0 0
0 -
878
Total
Volume
417
0 0
0 1.00
417
Thru
42 0
0 0

1.00 42
Left
Westbound
21 0
0 0

1.00 21
Right
348
0 0
0 1.00
348
Thru
Eastbound
28 0
0 0

1.00 28
Right
22 0
0 0

1.00 22
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida
Estacion and El
Camino Real
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1595
0 0
0 -
1595
Total
Volume
177
0 0
0 1.00
177
Right
214
0 0
0 1.00
214
Thru
27 0
0 0

1.00 27
Left
Westbound
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Right
208
0 0
0 1.00
208
Thru
151
0 0
0 1.00
151
Left
Eastbound
191
0 0
0 1.00
191
Right
97 0
0 0

1.00 97
Thru
231
0 0
0 1.00
231
Left
Southbound
20 0
0 0

1.00 20
Right
199
0 0
0 1.00
199
Thru
64 0
0 0

1.00 64
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida Pico
and El Camino
Real
1 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1061
Study Intersections
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1062
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1063
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1064
Traffic Volume - In-Process Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1065
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1066
Traffic Volume - Other Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1067
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1068
Traffic Conditions
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1069
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYPP_PM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 6 OYPP_PM V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

Signalized ICU 1 SB Right 0.450 - A
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
Signalized ICU 1 EB Right 0.270 - A
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Right 0.452 - A
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1070
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.452
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Avenida Pico and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 275.00 100.00 325.00 275.00 100.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 2 2 2 1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3 1 2 9
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 44 152 27 315 125 272 181 361 29 38 280 185 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 11 38 7 79 31 68 45 90 7 9 70 46 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 42 144 26 299 119 258 172 343 28 36 266 176 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 42 144 26 299 119 258 172 343 28 36 266 176 Name Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1071
Intersection V/C 0.452
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.02 0.14 0.14 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 4,5
Signal Group 0 3 0 0 4 5 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1072
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.270
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Avenida Estacion and El Camino Real
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 15.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5 0 2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 20 19 558 25 43 536
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 5 139 6 11 134
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19 18 530 24 41 509
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 19 18 530 24 41 509
Name Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1073
Intersection V/C 0.270
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.16
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 8 0 2 0 1 6
Control Type Split Split Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1074
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.450
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Vista Hermosa and Avenida Pico
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 275.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 167 298 209 316 427 277
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 42 74 52 79 107 69
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 160 286 201 303 410 266
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 160 286 201 303 410 266
Name Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico
Volumes
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1075
Intersection V/C 0.450
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.18 0.06 0.09 0.13 0.16
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 4 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1076
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYPP_PM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 6 OYPP_PM 1626
Total
Volume
266
Right
410
Thru
Westbound
303
Thru
201
Left
Eastbound
286
Right
160
Left
Southbound
Vista Hermosa and Avenida
Pico 4
ID Intersection Name
1141
Total
Volume
509
Thru
41 Left
Westbound
24 Right
530
Thru
Eastbound
18 Right
19 Left
Northbound
Avenida Estacion and El
Camino Real 2
ID Intersection Name
1909
Total
Volume
176
Right
266
Thru
36 Left
Westbound
28 Right
343
Thru
172
Left
Eastbound
258
Right
119
Thru
299
Left
Southbound
26 Right
144
Thru
42 Left
Northbound
Avenida Pico and El Camino
Real 1
ID Intersection Name
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1077
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: C:\...\ICU_OYPP_PM.pdf 1/16/2025
Vistro File: C:\...\LOS Study v4 - ICU.vistro Scenario 6 OYPP_PM 1626
0 0
0 -
1626
Total
Volume
266
0 0
0 1.00
266
Right
410
0 0
0 1.00
410
Thru
Westbound
303
0 0
0 1.00
303
Thru
201
0 0
0 1.00
201
Left
Eastbound
286
0 0
0 1.00
286
Right
160
0 0
0 1.00
160
Left
Southbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Vista Hermosa
and Avenida
Pico
4 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1141
0 0
0 -
1141
Total
Volume
509
0 0
0 1.00
509
Thru
41 0
0 0

1.00 41
Left
Westbound
24 0
0 0

1.00 24
Right
530
0 0
0 1.00
530
Thru
Eastbound
18 0
0 0

1.00 18
Right
19 0
0 0

1.00 19
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida
Estacion and El
Camino Real
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1909
0 0
0 -
1909
Total
Volume
176
0 0
0 1.00
176
Right
266
0 0
0 1.00
266
Thru
36 0
0 0

1.00 36
Left
Westbound
28 0
0 0

1.00 28
Right
343
0 0
0 1.00
343
Thru
172
0 0
0 1.00
172
Left
Eastbound
258
0 0
0 1.00
258
Right
119
0 0
0 1.00
119
Thru
299
0 0
0 1.00
299
Left
Southbound
26 0
0 0

1.00 26
Right
144
0 0
0 1.00
144
Thru
42 0
0 0

1.00 42
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Avenida Pico
and El Camino
Real
1 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1078
Study Intersections
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1079
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1080
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1081
Traffic Volume - In-Process Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1082
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1083
Traffic Volume - Other Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1084
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1085
Traffic Conditions
Version 2024 (SP 0-5)
Generated with
1086
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/14/2025
Exg_AM 3:30 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 0 9 0 2 53 10 169 0 0 88 17
Future Vol, veh/h 16 0 9 0 2 53 10 169 0 0 88 17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 5 2 0 5 2 0 6 2 0 6
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 22 0 13 0 3 74 14 235 0 0 122 24
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 409 403 145 390 414 240 152 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 140 140 - 263 263 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 269 263 - 127 152 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 551 535 900 567 527 797 1423 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 861 779 - 740 689 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 735 689 - 874 770 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 487 526 890 551 518 793 1415 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 487 526 - 551 518 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 856 774 - 732 682 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 653 682 - 858 765 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v11.58 10.13 0.42 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 101 - 581 778 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - 0.06 0.098 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 0 11.6 10.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.3 - -
1087
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/14/2025
Exg_PM 3:54 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 13 0 8 79 6 66 0 0 86 33
Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 13 0 8 79 6 66 0 0 86 33
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 4 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 31 0 16 0 10 98 7 81 0 0 106 41
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 231 225 133 206 245 82 149 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 129 129 - 96 96 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 102 96 - 110 149 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 722 672 914 749 655 974 1426 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 873 788 - 908 813 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 901 813 - 893 772 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 635 668 909 729 650 973 1424 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 635 668 - 729 650 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 871 786 - 903 809 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 796 809 - 873 771 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v10.45 9.37 0.63 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 150 - 708 931 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.066 0.115 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 10.4 9.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.4 - -
1088
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYNP_AM 4:14 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Future Vol, veh/h 38 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 5 2 0 5 2 0 6 2 0 6
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 53 0 15 0 4 75 15 236 0 0 161 35
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 458 451 189 433 469 241 202 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 184 184 - 267 267 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 274 267 - 166 202 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 511 502 850 531 491 795 1364 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 815 745 - 737 686 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 730 686 - 834 732 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 448 493 841 513 482 792 1356 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 448 493 - 513 482 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 810 741 - 727 678 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 645 678 - 814 728 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v13.32 10.24 0.47 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 109 - 501 766 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.136 0.103 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 0 13.3 10.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.5 0.3 - -
1089
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYNP_PM 4:15 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Future Vol, veh/h 39 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 4 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 48 0 19 0 11 101 9 85 0 0 172 59
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 312 306 207 278 335 86 233 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 203 203 - 102 102 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 109 102 - 176 233 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 638 606 831 672 584 970 1329 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 796 731 - 901 808 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 894 808 - 824 710 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 555 601 826 650 578 969 1326 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 555 601 - 650 578 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 795 730 - 895 803 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 783 803 - 802 709 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v11.61 9.52 0.71 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 166 - 611 908 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.109 0.124 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 0 11.6 9.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.4 0.4 - -
1090
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYPP_AM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Future Vol, veh/h 63 0 11 0 3 54 11 170 0 0 116 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 88 0 15 0 4 75 15 236 0 0 161 35
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 507 475 238 458 493 266 226 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 208 208 - 267 267 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 299 267 - 191 226 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 474 487 798 512 476 770 1337 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 791 728 - 737 686 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 708 686 - 808 715 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 394 466 753 480 456 748 1299 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 394 466 - 480 456 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 769 707 - 727 677 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 607 677 - 769 695 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v16.19 10.58 0.47 0

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 109 - 424 724 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - 0.243 0.109 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 16.2 10.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.9 0.4 - -
1091
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha 01/16/2025
OYPP_PM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Future Vol, veh/h 69 0 15 0 9 82 7 69 0 0 139 48
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 85 0 19 0 11 101 9 85 0 0 172 59
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 369 334 261 304 363 115 261 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 231 231 - 102 102 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 138 102 - 202 261 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 585 585 775 646 563 935 1298 - 0 0 - - Stage 1 769 711 - 901 808 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 863 808 - 798 690 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 477 564 731 608 543 908 1261 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 477 564 - 608 543 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 747 691 - 895 803 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 729 803 - 756 671 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v13.87 9.87 0.73 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 166 - 509 851 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.204 0.132 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 0 13.9 9.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.8 0.5 - -
1092
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
Exg_AM 3:30 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 389 17 444 44
v/c Ratio 0.15 0.05 0.17 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.6 22.8 3.2 11.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.6 22.8 3.2 11.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 2 0 2
Queue Length 95th (ft) 91 26 70 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3041 596 3136 1049
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.03 0.14 0.04
Intersection Summary
1093
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
Exg_PM 3:54 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 572 8 533 33
v/c Ratio 0.22 0.03 0.20 0.10
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.4 24.9 3.1 14.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.4 24.9 3.1 14.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 1 0 2
Queue Length 95th (ft) 134 17 83 28
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3013 572 3136 1005
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.01 0.17 0.03
Intersection Summary
1094
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYNP_AM 4:14 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 396 23 452 56
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.07 0.17 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.8 22.2 3.3 11.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.8 22.2 3.3 11.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 3 0 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 94 31 71 34
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3041 593 3136 1044
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.04 0.14 0.05
Intersection Summary
1095
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYNP_PM 4:15 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 599 17 561 41
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.06 0.21 0.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.8 24.1 3.2 13.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.8 24.1 3.2 13.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 2 0 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 145 26 89 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 3040 560 3136 981
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.03 0.18 0.04
Intersection Summary
1096
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYPP_AM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 400 46 456 56
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.17 0.19 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 29.4 4.8 13.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 10.7 29.4 4.8 13.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 11 16 6
Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 51 71 35
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 2936 479 3136 815
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.10 0.15 0.07
Intersection Summary
1097
Queues
2: Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real 01/17/2025
OYPP_PM 4:16 am 01/06/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 603 44 564 41
v/c Ratio 0.29 0.17 0.23 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 31.3 4.7 15.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 10.9 31.3 4.7 15.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 14 21 7
Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 49 89 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1014 267 200
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 2926 443 3136 760
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.10 0.18 0.05
Intersection Summary
1098
Appendix E: Existing Study
Intersection Turning Movement
Counts Appendix
1099
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 1
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 110 2 1122012 0 0000
7:00 AM 14 30 1 22 12 19 20 27 0 5 24 19 193 0000 0
7:15 AM 8 30 2 31 15 17 20 26 5 2 33 20 209 0000 0
7:30 AM 3 29 0 56 21 32 30 47 2 2 35 36 293 0000 0
7:45 AM 22 57 0 76 32 39 31 70 6 4 40 38 415 0000 0
8:00 AM 23 41 3 45 11 22 37 37 2 2 49 62 334 0000 0
8:15 AM 5 41 1 61 17 54 38 38 3 3 71 46 378 0000 0
8:30 AM 11 29 4 49 16 52 39 63 3 7 47 31 351 0000 0
8:45 AM 14 28 3 53 15 34 54 58 4 1 41 26 331 0000 0
VOLUMES 100 285 14 393 139 269 269 366 25 26 340 278 2,504 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 25% 71% 4% 49% 17% 34% 41% 55% 4% 4% 53% 43% APP/DEPART 399 / 832 801 / 190 660 / 773 644 / 709 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 61 168 8 231 76 167 145 208 14 16 207 177 1,478 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 26% 71% 3% 49% 16% 35% 40% 57% 4% 4% 52% 44% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.750 0.806 0.857 0.833 0.890
APP/DEPART 237 / 490 474 / 106 367 / 447 400 / 435 0
4:00 PM 14 30 7 83 17 60 38 83 10 8 66 49 465 0000 0
4:15 PM 7 20 2 73 22 61 51 92 5 2 68 39 442 0000 0
4:30 PM 11 30 4 60 18 57 43 82 3 2 73 49 432 0000 0
4:45 PM 6 35 3 83 22 51 36 86 6 4 50 39 421 0000 0
5:00 PM 11 23 0 83 30 47 46 90 4 3 65 44 446 0000 0
5:15 PM 12 18 3 94 18 65 43 65 4 2 55 51 430 0000 0
5:30 PM 10 19 2 72 21 27 40 65 4 5 52 37 354 0000 0
5:45 PM 5 17 5 79 17 30 19 44 4 2 45 36 303 0000 0
VOLUMES 76 192 26 627 165 398 316 607 40 28 474 344 3,293 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 26% 65% 9% 53% 14% 33% 33% 63% 4% 3% 56% 41% APP/DEPART 294 / 852 1,190 / 233 963 / 1,260 846 / 948 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 38 115 16 299 79 229 168 343 24 16 257 176 1,760 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 22% 68% 9% 49% 13% 38% 31% 64% 4% 4% 57% 39% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.828 0.948 0.904 0.905 0.946
APP/DEPART 169 / 459 607 / 119 535 / 658 449 / 524 0
Avenida Pico

NORTH LEG
El Camino Real WEST LEG EAST LEG El Camino Real

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Pico

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 3 0 1 5 9 2004 6 1011 3
7:15 AM 2 2 3 2 9 1111 4 1121 5
7:30 AM 1 1 3 0 5 1120 4 0010 1
7:45 AM 1 2 0 2 5 0201 3 1001 2
8:00 AM 1 3 4 4 12 1104 6 0240 6
8:15 AM 1 4 5 4 14 1303 7 0151 7
8:30 AM 0 1 1 1 3 0111 3 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 2 2 0 4 0120 3 0100 1
TOTAL 9 15 19 18 61 6 10 6 14 36 3 5 13 4 25
BEGIN PEAK HR 2 7 1 9 19
4:00 PM 0 2 2 1 5 0000 0 0221 5
4:15 PM 2 3 4 1 10 1341 9 1000 1
4:30 PM 0 1 1 1 3 0111 3 0000 0
4:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0000 0 1000 1
5:00 PM 2 0 3 5 10 1021 4 1014 6
5:15 PM 0 4 3 2 9 0322 7 0110 2
5:30 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0002 2 0002 2
5:45 PM 0 1 2 1 4 0121 4 0000 0
TOTAL 5 11 15 15 46 2 8 11 8 29 3 3 4 7 17
1452 12

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Pico Avenida Pico El Camino Real El Camino Real

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:00 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
1100
1,991 667 304 1,020 TOTAL 1,684
1,190 398 165 627 PM 852
801 269 139 393 AM 832
644 846
1,490
1,657
948 709
278 344 622
340 474 814
TOTAL
PM
AM
26 28 54
585 316 269
AMPM
TOTAL
973 607 366
65 40 25
773
1,260 2,033
1,623
963 660
190 AM 100 285 14 399
233 PM 76 192 26 294
423 TOTAL 176 477 40 693
1,081 396 155 530 TOTAL 949
607 229 79 299 PM 459
474 167 76 231 AM 490
400 449 849
959 524 435
177 176 353
207 257 464
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
16 16 32
313 168 145
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
551 343 208
PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
38 24 14
447 658
1,105
902 535 367
106 AM 61 168 8 237
119 PM 38 115 16 169
225 Total 99 283 24 406
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

PEAK HOUR
1101
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 2
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0X0 X XXX2012 X 0000
7:00 AM 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 46 5 5 52 0 113 0000 0
7:15 AM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 48 3 4 54 0 113 0000 0
7:30 AM 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 73 1 4 67 0 154 0000 0
7:45 AM 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 106 8 11 87 0 224 0000 0
8:00 AM 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 60 0 2 96 0 170 0000 0
8:15 AM 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 76 4 2 121 0 214 0000 0
8:30 AM 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 104 4 1 109 0 224 0000 0
8:45 AM 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 109 4 5 82 0 211 0000 0
VOLUMES 34 0 36 0 0 0 0 622 29 34 668 0 1,423 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 49% 0% 51% 0% 0% 0% 0% 96% 4% 5% 95% 0%
APP/DEPART 70 / 00 / 63 651 / 658 702 / 702 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 19 0 22 0 0 0 0 346 16 16 413 0 832 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 46% 0% 54% 0% 0% 0% 0% 96% 4% 4% 96% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.854 0.000 0.794 0.872 0.929
APP/DEPART 41 / 00 / 32 362 / 368 429 / 432 0
4:00 PM 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 138 6 1 134 0 287 0010 1
4:15 PM 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 131 3 3 132 0 281 0000 0
4:30 PM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 130 4 3 138 0 281 0000 0
4:45 PM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 127 4 1 102 0 239 0000 0
5:00 PM 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 134 2 1 114 0 264 0000 0
5:15 PM 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 108 2 5 128 0 252 0000 0
5:30 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 3 86 0 209 0000 0
5:45 PM 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 66 1 4 79 0 158 0000 0
VOLUMES 34 0 30 0 0 0 0 951 22 21 913 0 1,972 0 0 1 0 1 APPROACH % 53% 0% 47% 0% 0% 0% 0% 98% 2% 2% 98% 0%
APP/DEPART 64 / 00 / 43 974 / 981 934 / 948 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 17 0 14 0 0 0 0 526 17 8 506 0 1,089 0 0 1 0
APPROACH % 55% 0% 45% 0% 0% 0% 0% 97% 3% 2% 98% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.646 0.000 0.938 0.911 0.945
APP/DEPART 31 / 00 / 25 544 / 540 514 / 524 0
Avenida Estacion

NORTH LEG
El Camino Real WEST LEG EAST LEG El Camino Real

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Estacion

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0010 1 0100 1
7:15 AM 0 3 2 0 5 0210 3 0110 2
7:30 AM 0 7 3 0 10 0530 8 0200 2
7:45 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0000 0 1010 2
8:00 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0100 1 0300 3
8:15 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0100 1 0200 2
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0030 3 0000 0
TOTAL 1 18 10 0 29 0 9 8 0 17 1 9 2 0 12
BEGIN PEAK HR 0200 2
4:00 PM 0 3 3 0 6 0020 2 0310 4
4:15 PM 0 2 4 0 6 0130 4 0110 2
4:30 PM 1 0 7 0 8 0070 7 1000 1
4:45 PM 1 1 2 1 5 0020 2 1101 3
5:00 PM 1 0 2 0 3 0020 2 1000 1
5:15 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0200 2 0100 1
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0000 0
5:45 PM 1 2 1 1 5 0000 0 1211 5
TOTAL 4 11 19 2 36 0 3 16 0 19 4 8 3 2 17
0 1 14 0 15

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:00 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Estacion Avenida Estacion El Camino Real El Camino Real

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Estacion
El Camino Real
1102
0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0
0 000 PM 0
0 000 AM 0
702 934
1,636
1,650
948 702
0 0 0
668 913
1,581
TOTAL
PM
AM
34 21 55
0 0 0
AMPM
TOTAL
1,573
951 622
51 22 29
658 981
1,639
1,625
974 651
63 AM 34 0 36 70
43 PM 34 0 30 64
106 TOTAL 68 0 66 134
0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0
0 000 PM 0
0 000 AM 0
429 514 943
956 524 432
0 0 0
413 506 919
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
16 8
24 0 0 0
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
872 526 346
PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
33 17 16
368 540 908
906 544 362
32 AM 19 0 22 41
25 PM 17 0 14 31
57 Total 36 0 36 72
Avenida Estacion
Avenida Estacion
Avenida Estacion
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida Estacion
El Camino Real
El Camino Real

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
1103
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 3
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP E/W
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 010 0 1001001 0 0000
7:00 AM 0 30 0 0 10 6 7 0 1 0 2 11 67 0000 0
7:15 AM 1 27 0 0 14 9 6 0 0 0 0 3 60 0100 1
7:30 AM 1 28 0 0 18 7 3 0 1 2 1 3 64 0000 0
7:45 AM 4 56 0 0 38 4 4 0 4 0 0 16 126 0000 0
8:00 AM 2 59 0 0 11 4 4 0 2 0 1 7 90 0000 0
8:15 AM 1 26 0 0 18 3 1 0 2 0 0 18 69 0100 1
8:30 AM 3 28 0 0 21 6 7 0 1 0 1 12 79 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 24 0 0 15 2 5 0 3 1 1 14 65 0100 1
VOLUMES 12 278 0 0 145 41 37 0 14 3 6 84 623 0 3 0 0 3
APPROACH % 4% 96% 0% 0% 77% 22% 73% 0% 27% 3% 6% 90%
APP/DEPART 290 / 402 189 / 162 51 / 0 93 / 59 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 10 169 0 0 88 17 16 0 9 0 2 53 365 0100
APPROACH % 6% 94% 0% 0% 83% 16% 64% 0% 36% 0% 4% 96%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.734 0.631 0.781 0.764 0.724
APP/DEPART 179 / 239 106 / 97 25 / 0 55 / 29 0
4:00 PM 3 18 0 0 18 17 12 0 5 0 3 21 97 0000 0
4:15 PM 1 7 0 0 21 8 5 0 3 0 0 18 63 0000 0
4:30 PM 1 25 0 0 19 4 3 0 3 0 3 17 75 0000 0
4:45 PM 1 16 0 0 28 4 5 0 2 0 2 23 81 0000 0
5:00 PM 3 10 0 0 30 7 6 0 3 0 1 19 79 0000 0
5:15 PM 0 9 0 0 23 1 8 0 2 0 1 16 60 0000 0
5:30 PM 1 10 0 0 26 3 3 0 1 0 0 18 62 0000 0
5:45 PM 1 6 0 0 18 5 6 0 4 0 1 16 57 0000 0
VOLUMES 11 101 0 0 183 49 48 0 23 0 11 148 574 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 10% 90% 0% 0% 79% 21% 68% 0% 32% 0% 7% 93%
APP/DEPART 112 / 297 232 / 206 71 / 0 159 / 71 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 6 66 0 0 86 33 25 0 13 0 8 79 316 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 8% 92% 0% 0% 72% 28% 66% 0% 34% 0% 9% 91%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.692 0.850 0.559 0.870 0.814
APP/DEPART 72 / 170 119 / 99 38 / 0 87 / 47 0
Avenida Pico

NORTH LEG
Calle Deshecha WEST LEG EAST LEG Calle Deshecha

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Pico

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0000 0 1000 1
7:15 AM 1 0 1 3 5 1002 3 0011 2
7:30 AM 0 1 2 0 3 0110 2 0010 1
7:45 AM 1 0 1 2 4 0001 1 1011 3
8:00 AM 5 4 4 2 15 3012 6 2430 9
8:15 AM 8 4 5 2 19 2202 6 6250 13
8:30 AM 3 0 2 1 6 0011 2 3010 4
8:45 AM 2 1 2 1 6 1120 4 1001 2
TOTAL 21 10 17 11 59 7 4 5 8 24 14 6 12 3 35
BEGIN PEAK HR 5 2 2 6 15
4:00 PM 0 1 1 1 3 0000 0 0111 3
4:15 PM 3 2 0 2 7 1202 5 2000 2
4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0000 0 2000 2
4:45 PM 3 4 0 0 7 0200 2 3200 5
5:00 PM 3 0 0 0 3 2000 2 1000 1
5:15 PM 2 1 0 4 7 0102 3 2002 4
5:30 PM 3 0 0 0 3 0000 0 3000 3
5:45 PM 1 0 2 0 3 0020 2 1000 1
TOTAL 17 8 3 7 35 3 5 2 4 14 14 3 1 3 21
1402 7

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Pico Avenida Pico Calle Deshecha Calle Deshecha

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:00 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
1104
421 90 328 0 TOTAL 699
232 49 183 0 PM 297
189 41 145 0 AM 402
93 159 252
130
71 59
84 148 232
6 11 17
TOTAL
PM
AM
3 0 3
85 48 37
AMPM
TOTAL
0 0 0
37 23 14
0 0 0
122
71 51
162 AM 12 278 0 290
206 PM 11 101 0 112
368 TOTAL 23 379 0 402
225 50 174 0 TOTAL 409
119 33 86 0 PM 170
106 17 88 0 AM 239
55 87
142
76 47 29
53 79
132
2 8
10 TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0
41 25 16
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
0 0 0
PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
22 13
9 0 0 0
63 38 25
97 AM 10 169 0 179
99 PM 6 66 0 72
196 Total 16 235 0 251
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
Calle Deshecha

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico
Calle Deshecha
Calle Deshecha

PEAK HOUR
1105
T112224
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5059
Thu, Dec 5, 24 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 4
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: XXX 2 X 1 2 2XX 2 1 0000
7:00 AM 0 0 0 15 0 25 21 46 0 0 27 15 149 0000 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 10 0 33 37 39 0 0 35 17 171 0000 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 22 0 57 54 37 0 0 59 18 247 0010 1
7:45 AM 0 0 0 25 0 80 66 56 0 0 61 26 314 0000 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 27 0 33 67 70 0 0 43 31 271 0010 1
8:15 AM 0 0 0 28 0 48 49 81 0 0 86 29 321 0030 3
8:30 AM 0 0 0 40 0 40 41 60 0 0 69 44 294 0020 2
8:45 AM 0 0 0 28 0 45 36 62 0 0 57 40 268 0000 0
VOLUMES 0 0 0 195 0 361 371 451 0 0 437 220 2,042 0 0 7 0 7 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 65% 45% 54% 0% 0% 67% 33%
APP/DEPART 0 / 591 556 / 0 829 / 646 657 / 805 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 120 0 201 223 267 0 0 259 130 1,206 0 0 6 0 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% 63% 45% 54% 0% 0% 67% 33%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.764 0.899 0.846 0.931
APP/DEPART 0 / 353 321 / 0 496 / 387 389 / 466 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 46 0 74 47 65 0 0 72 62 366 0010 1
4:15 PM 0 0 0 45 0 58 50 68 0 0 101 69 391 0020 2
4:30 PM 0 0 0 44 0 45 62 69 0 0 86 70 376 0010 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 27 0 87 46 71 0 0 74 58 363 0010 1
5:00 PM 0 0 0 41 0 77 52 64 0 0 80 72 386 0000 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 48 0 77 41 66 0 0 101 66 399 0000 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 27 0 62 46 60 0 0 56 48 299 0000 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 42 0 59 35 41 0 0 63 35 275 0000 0
VOLUMES 0 0 0 320 0 539 379 504 0 0 633 480 2,860 0 0 5 0 5 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% 63% 43% 57% 0% 0% 57% 43%
APP/DEPART 0 / 859 859 / 0 888 / 824 1,113 / 1,177 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 160 0 286 201 270 0 0 341 266 1,526 0 0 2 0 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 36% 0% 64% 42% 57% 0% 0% 56% 44%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.892 0.896 0.909 0.956
APP/DEPART 0 / 467 446 / 0 473 / 430 607 / 629 0
Avenida Vista Hermosa

NORTH LEG
Avenida Pico WEST LEG EAST LEG Avenida Pico

SOUTH LEG
Avenida Vista Hermosa

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0000 0 0200 2
7:15 AM 2 1 0 1 4 0000 0 2101 4
7:30 AM 0 1 0 2 3 0000 0 0102 3
7:45 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0001 1 1100 2
8:00 AM 0 4 0 1 5 0001 1 0400 4
8:15 AM 0 6 1 0 7 0000 0 0610 7
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0000 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0001 1 0000 0
TOTAL 3 15 1 6 25 0 0 0 3 3 3 15 1 3 22
BEGIN PEAK HR 0002 2
4:00 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0000 0 0110 2
4:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0000 0 0100 1
4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0000 0 1000 1
4:45 PM 0 1 0 1 2 0000 0 0101 2
5:00 PM 1 1 1 0 3 1000 1 0110 2
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0000 0 0001 1
5:30 PM 4 0 0 0 4 3000 3 1000 1
5:45 PM 2 0 0 1 3 1001 2 1000 1
TOTAL 8 4 2 3 17 5 0 0 1 6 3 4 2 2 11
1000 1

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
San Clemente
Avenida Vista Hermosa
Avenida Pico
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:30 PM

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Avenida Vista Hermosa Avenida Vista Hermosa Avenida Pico Avenida Pico

AM PM AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:30 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER
7:45 AM
1106
1,415 900 0 515 TOTAL 1,450
859 539 0 320 PM 859
556 361 0 195 AM 591
657
1,113 1,770
1,982 1,177
805
220 480 700
437 633
1,070
TOTAL
PM
AM
0 0 0
750 379 371
AMPM
TOTAL
955 504 451
0 0 0
646 824
1,470
1,717
888 829
0 AM 000 0
0 PM 000 0
0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0
767 487 0 280 TOTAL 820
446 286 0 160 PM 467
321 201 0 120 AM 353
389 607 996
1,095
629 466
130 266 396
259 341 600
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0
424 201 223
#N/A
AMPM
TOTAL
537 270 267
PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0 0
387 430 817
969 473 496
0 AM 000 0
0 PM 000 0
0 Total 0 0 0 0
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Avenida Vista Hermosa
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico

ALL HOURS
San Clemente
SC5059
Avenida Vista Hermosa
Avenida Vista Hermosa
Avenida Vista Hermosa
Avenida Pico
Avenida Pico

PEAK HOUR
1107
F: Project Delivery Operations
Memorandum
1108
32402 Crown Valley Parkway #102 - Dana Point - California - 92629 - ph. 949.338.2603 - Page 1 of 2

California California iforniaCoastal Coastal CoastalCommission CommissionCommission CommissionProject Project ProjectResponse ResponseResponse Response Job NO. 2023 - 020
DATE: January 16, 2025
Reference:Reference: Reference: Reference: SPP22.321, 22.321, 22.321,CUP22.322, 22.322, 22.322,CHP22.323 APN# 057.191.60 057.191.60057.191.60 057.191.60
N-Tract#14486

Project Project ProjectAddress: Address:Address: Address:

The Galleria “The Hansen” 1801
North El Camino Real San
Clemente, CA 92673
Attention:Attention: Attention: Attention:

Paul Herrmann
Fehr & Peers
Transportation Engineer
Ph:949.308.6333
CC: Rachel Nasre Owner
Paul,
Thank you for helping to coordinate our efforts for traffic engineering and analyses for our project. Below is a summary of our development team’s findings and estimates for the anticipated delivery frequency and schedule for our project's operational deliveries.

We have developed the following summary based on market research, owner-operator experience, and industry professional advice and consultation.

Project Summary:

61 room boutique hotel
106 Parking Stalls on-site
Restaurants/Food and Beverage:

1. Rooftop Restaurant 132 Seats

2. Lobby Café 32 Seats (8 patio seats no additional parking per SC Parking Ord.)

3. Street Side Pick-up Window Café (8 patio seats, no additional Parking per SC Parking Ord.)

4. Pool Side Bar 14 Seats – Hotel Guest Serving Only (no additional parking)

5. Pool Deck with +/- 32 Lounge Chairs - Served by Pool Side Bar (no additional parking) A dedicated Room was allocated for the Onsite Laundry Facility. 1109
32402 Crown Valley Parkway #102 - Dana Point - California - 92629 - ph. 949.338.2603 - Page 2 of 2 The proposed The proposed The proposedTotal Delivery DeliveryDelivery Deliveryper week per week per week per week will range from will range from will range from 11 to 15. 11 to 15.11 to 15. 11 to 15.

Hotel Delivers for Food and Beverage and Hotel Operations:

We anticipate a range of eight (8) to twelve (12) deliveries per week for food and beverage. Below is a summary of the minimum delivery.

Two (2) Each from Major Food Supply Mondays & Thursdays Thee (3) Each from Local Beer and Wine (Liquor) suppliers Wine 1x and Beer 1x and Liquor 1x 2 Each from fresh produce and herb vendors = 2x weekly
One (1) Each from Chemical/Landrey service company (Note: not all offer the same services, and this usually can be absorbed by major food suppliers)
Housekeeping and Hotel Services anticipates three (3) deliveries per week, based on the owner-operator's experience.

The following operational protocols will be implemented and maintained for all hotel vendors.

1. Deliveries will be managed to be made during “off-peak hours,” with 40% being made prior to 8:00 a.m. and the balance being done on an assigned time block (outside of peak generation hours) to help distribute and spread out deliveries and eliminate queuing issues.

2. Deliveries will be made by 20’ – 30’ light-duty service trucks or Service Vans. a. Service vans (local vendors) may use our garage entry and dedicated turn-around stalls within the garage.

3. The Hotel will operate with on-site laundry services to reduce daily laundry pick-up and delivery. a. Should laundry service become a product of future operations, a light-duty service truck will deliver and pick up laundry between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.

4. As proposed, all pick-ups and deliveries may be serviced at the Hotel’s Loading Area and/or through the garage.

5. Dedicated space shall be allocated at the Lobby Area and the Street Side Café to support expeditious delivery when required.

Respectfully submitted by:

Jorden Segraves, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB
Principal
JORDEN SEGRAVES ARCHITECT:INC.
ph 949.338.2603
1110
32402 Crown Valley Parkway #102 - Dana Point - California - 92629 - ph. 949.338.2603 - Page 1 of 2

California California iforniaCoastal Coastal CoastalCommission CommissionCommission CommissionProject Project ProjectResponse ResponseResponse Response Job NO. 2023 - 020
DATE: January 16, 2025
Reference:Reference: Reference: Reference: SPP22.321, 22.321, 22.321,CUP22.322, 22.322, 22.322,CHP22.323 APN# 057.191.60 057.191.60057.191.60 057.191.60
N-Tract#14486

Project Project ProjectAddress: Address:Address: Address:

The Galleria “The Hansen” 1801
North El Camino Real San
Clemente, CA 92673
Attention:Attention: Attention: Attention:

Paul Herrmann
Fehr & Peers
Transportation Engineer
Ph:949.308.6333
CC: Rachel Nasre Owner
Paul,
Thank you for helping to coordinate our efforts for traffic engineering and analyses for our project. Below is a summary of our development team’s findings and estimates for the anticipated delivery frequency and schedule for our project's operational deliveries.

We have developed the following summary based on market research, owner-operator experience, and industry professional advice and consultation.

Project Summary:

61 room boutique hotel
106 Parking Stalls on-site
Restaurants/Food and Beverage:

1. Rooftop Restaurant 132 Seats

2. Lobby Café 32 Seats (8 patio seats no additional parking per SC Parking Ord.)

3. Street Side Pick-up Window Café (8 patio seats, no additional Parking per SC Parking Ord.)

4. Pool Side Bar 14 Seats – Hotel Guest Serving Only (no additional parking)

5. Pool Deck with +/- 32 Lounge Chairs - Served by Pool Side Bar (no additional parking) A dedicated Room was allocated for the Onsite Laundry Facility.

The Hansen Proposed Project Delivery
1111
32402 Crown Valley Parkway #102 - Dana Point - California - 92629 - ph. 949.338.2603 - Page 2 of 2 The proposed The proposedTotal Delivery DeliveryDelivery Deliveryper week per week per week per week will range from will range from will range from 11 to 15. 11 to 15.11 to 15. 11 to 15.

Hotel Delivers for Food and Beverage and Hotel Operations:

We anticipate a range of eight (8) to twelve (12) deliveries per week for food and beverage. Below is a summary of the minimum delivery.

Two (2) Each from Major Food Supply Mondays & Thursdays Thee (3) Each from Local Beer and Wine (Liquor) suppliers Wine 1x and Beer 1x and Liquor 1x 2 Each from fresh produce and herb vendors = 2x weekly
One (1) Each from Chemical/Landrey service company (Note: not all offer the same services, and this usually can be absorbed by major food suppliers)
Housekeeping and Hotel Services anticipates three (3) deliveries per week, based on the owner-operator's experience.

The following operational protocols will be implemented and maintained for all hotel vendors.

1. Deliveries will be managed to be made during “off-peak hours,” with 40% being made prior to 8:00 a.m. and the balance being done on an assigned time block (outside of peak generation hours) to help distribute and spread out deliveries and eliminate queuing issues.

2. Deliveries will be made by 20’ – 30’ light-duty service trucks or Service Vans. a. Service vans (local vendors) may use our garage entry and dedicated turn-around stalls within the garage.

3. The Hotel will operate with on-site laundry services to reduce daily laundry pick-up and delivery. a. Should laundry service become a product of future operations, a light-duty service truck will deliver and pick up laundry between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.

4. As proposed, all pick-ups and deliveries may be serviced at the Hotel’s Loading Area and/or through the garage.

5. Dedicated space shall be allocated at the Lobby Area and the Street Side Café to support expeditious delivery when required.

Respectfully submitted by:

Jorden Segraves, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB
Principal
JORDEN SEGRAVES ARCHITECT:INC.
ph 949.338.2603
1112
APPENDIX H.2
VMT Screening Assessment
1113
This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. 1114
210935 – Hanson Hotel Page 1 of 9
Technical Memorandum
February 2, 2026
To: Kristen Bogue, Michael Baker International
From: Jordan Gray PE TE, Michael Baker International
Subject: San Clemente 1801 N. El Camino Real - VMT Screening Assessment
Introduction
The purpose of this memorandum is to document a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) assessment for the proposed Hanson Hotel (Project) in support of the transportation component of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis. Specifically, a VMT screening analysis is documented in this memorandum. The Project proposes to construct a three-story, 61-room hotel, with a third-floor rooftop restaurant and bar, two cafes, pool with a bar and restaurant, and a two-level subterranean parking structure with site improvements including walls, hardscape, landscape, pedestrian improvements, and improvements in the City right-of-way.

Table 1 provides key Project information. Exhibit 1 shows the location of the Project and Exhibit 2 shows the conceptual site plan.

Table 1 – Project Information Summary
Item Description
Project Title Hanson Hotel
Project Location
1801 N. El Camino Real
Northwest corner of El Camino Real and E. Avenida Pico, in the City of San Clemente, Orange County, California.

Surrounding Uses
The existing site is bordered by commercial uses to the south and east, open space and Pico Park to the north and west. San Clemente Metrolink Station is located approximately 400 feet to the west on the south side of El Camino Real.

Existing Use The existing site is vacant and undeveloped.

Proposed Use
The Project would consist of a three-story, 61-room hotel, with a third-floor rooftop restaurant and bar, two cafes, pool with a bar and restaurant, and a two-level subterranean parking structure with site improvements including walls, hardscape, landscape, pedestrian improvements, and improvements in the City right-of-way. 1115
210935 – Hanson Hotel Page 2 of 9
Project Trip Generation
The Project site trips were documented in the Focused Transportation Study performed by Fehr & Peers on January 17, 2025 under a separate cover and included in Attachment A. As summarized in this separate report, the trip generation equations from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition. Table 2 provides the trip generation equations for a hotel use (ITE Land Use Code 310), fine dining use (ITE Land Use Code 931), and café use (ITE Land Use Code 936). Table 3 summarizes the vehicular trip generation forecast to be generated by the Project.

As shown in Table 3, during the weekday, the proposed Project is forecast to generate approximately 1,631 daily trips with 57 AM Peak Hour trips (32 inbound / 25 outbound), and 65 PM Peak Hour trips (36 inbound / 29 outbound).

Table 2 – ITE Trip Generation Rates
Land Use ITE Land Use
Code (1) Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In : Out Total In : Out
Hotel 310 5.84 / Room 0.46 / Room 56% : 44% 0.59 / Room 51% : 49% Fine Dining 931 83.84 / KSF (2) 0.73 / KSF (2)
- : - 7.80 / KSF (2) 67% : 33%
Café (Public Walk-Up) 936 - / KSF (2) 93.08 / KSF (2) 51% : 49% 32.29 / KSF (2) 50% : 50% (1) Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021) (2)KSF = 1,000 square feet
Table 3 – Project Trip Generation
Land Use Intensity Daily
Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Volume Inbound Outbound Volume Inbound Outbound
Hotel 61 Rooms 487 28 16 12 36 18 18
Fine Dining 2.54 KSF (1) 213 2 2 0 20 13 7
Café (Public Walk-Up) 0.29 KSF (1) 931 27 14 13 9 5 4
Total Trip Generation 1,631 57 32 25 65 36 29
(1)KSF = 1,000 square feet
VMT Assessment Guidelines & Methodology
The City of San Clemente currently does not have their own adopted VMT guidelines. The primary resource for this VMT screening assessment is the Orange County Guidelines for Evaluating VMT Under CEQA (County Guidelines) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory (TA) on Evaluating Transportation Impacts for CEQA. As outlined in the County Guidelines, certain projects, because of their size, nature, or location, are exempt from the requirements of preparing a detailed VMT analysis and can be presumed to have a less than significant impact based on certain screening criteria.

Screening Criteria
Each of the screening criteria outlined in the County Guidelines were evaluated for the proposed Project and the results are summarized in Table 4. As shown, the Project meets the screening criteria based on the “Small Project” criterion identified below. Therefore, a full VMT analysis is NOT required, and the Project is presumed to have a less-than-significant transportation impact on the environment. 1116
210935 – Hanson Hotel Page 3 of 9
TABLE 4 – VMT SCREENING CRITERIA SUMMARY
Screening Criteria1 Project Evaluation Result
Projects
Located Near
Transit
Per OPR’s Technical Advisory, residential, retail, office projects, or projects that have a mix of those uses whose project site boundaries are within one half mile of an existing major transit stop, planned major transit stop, or a stop/transit center along a high-quality transit corridor would normally be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact. Unless the project is inconsistent with the RTP/SCS, has a floor-to-area-ratio (FAR) less than 0.75, provides an excessive amount of parking, or reduces the number of affordable residential units, the project will be considered less than significant.

The Project is located
within one half mile of an
existing major transit
stop and has a FAR of

0.937, consistent with
the RTP/SCS, and does
not provide excessive
amount of parking, and
does not reduce the
number of affordable
residential units. (See
Exhibit 3)
Screening
Criteria Is
Met
Neighborhood
Retail Project
The project involves local-serving retail space of less than 50,000 square feet.

The Project does not
provide local retail.

Therefore, this criteria
does not apply.

Screening
Criteria Is
Not Met
Affordable
Housing
Projects
County guidelines allows for a less than significant finding for transportation impacts of residential projects that are 100% affordable housing units.

The project is a hotel and
is not considered
affordable housing.

Screening
Criteria Is
Not Met
Low VMT Area
Per County Guidelines, if the project is in a Low VMT area, and incorporates similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility), it can be reasonably presumed that it will exhibit similarly low VMT. (See Exhibit 4)
The Project site is not
within a low VMT area.

Screening
Criteria Is
Not Met
Small Projects
Per the County’s Guidelines, projects are considered small projects with up to 500 ADT due to the common GHG emissions thresholds of 3,000 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2E) per year. The County states that vehicle emissions are typically more than 50 percent of the total project GHG emissions. Thus, a project with 500 ADT would generally have total project emissions that could be less than 1,300 MT CO2E/year.

The Project is expected
to generate 1,631 ADT,
which is above the
County’s 500 ADT
requirement.

Screening
Criteria Is
Not Met
1117
210935 – Hanson Hotel Page 4 of 9
TABLE 4 – VMT SCREENING CRITERIA SUMMARY
Screening Criteria1 Project Evaluation Result
Local-Serving
Public Facilities
Similar to retail land uses, local-serving public facilities are presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT. This would include government facilities intended to serve the local public, parks, public elementary schools, public middle schools, and public high schools.

The Project is not
considered a localserving public facility.

Therefore, this criteria
does not apply.

Screening
Criteria Is
Not Met
Source: Guidelines for Evaluating Vehicle Miles Traveled Under CEQA for the County of Orange (2020), Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory (TA) on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA Conclusion
The VMT evaluation of the Project proposed in San Clemente shows that the Project meets the screening criteria under “Projects Located Near Transit”. Therefore, the Project is presumed to result in a less-thansignificant transportation impact under CEQA and a detailed VMT analysis is not required. 1118
Exhibit 1
Regional Project Area
H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits Not to Scale
December 2025
1119
Not to Scale
Exhibit 2
Site Plan
H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits December 2025
1120
Exhibit 3
County of Orange Transit Priority Areas
Project Site
Source:

CEQA Transportation Thresholds of Significance Guide
H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits Not to Scale
December 2025
1121
Exhibit 4
Existing VMT Per Capita by TAZ
29 ggpy
Project Site
Source: Orange County Transportation Demand Management Plan Appendix 3: Geographic Needs Assessment Memorandum, June 2024 H:\pdata\210935\Admin\Reports\Environmental\Tech Studies\VMT Screening\exhibits Not to Scale
December 2025
1122
210935 – Hanson Hotel Page 9 of 9

ATTACHMENT A
1123

101 Pacifia | Suite 300 | Irvine, CA 92618 | (949) 308-6300 | Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com Memorandum
Date: January 17, 2025
To: Jorden Segraves, Jorden Segraves Architect Inc.

From: Paul Herrmann, P.E.

Joshua Geronimo
Subject: The Hansen Hotel – Focused Transportation Study OC24-1095
Fehr & Peers completed a focused transportation study for the Hansen Hotel development project (Project) in the City of San Clemente, California. This scope of this assessment was coordinated with City staff and approved on December 12, 2024. This assessment evaluates the effect of Project traffic on City transportation infrastructure and concludes that improvements are not needed to meet City standards/requirements on Level of Service (LOS), queueing capacity, or traffic signal warrants.

Project Description
The Hansen Hotel project proposes a 61-room hotel with 2.54 KSF of restaurant space and 0.29 KSF of a public walk-up café. There are amenities such as a poolside lounge and bar, and a lobby café that are exclusive to hotel guests.

The Project site plan is provided as Appendix A. The project is located at the northwest corner of Avenida Pico and El Camino Real, with right-in/right-out driveway access along the north side of El Camino Real.

The Project anticipates 11-15 deliveries per week during off-peak hours, with additional detail provided in Appendix F.

ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT 16 1124
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 2 of 8 ends

Data Collection
Fehr & Peers collected the following traffic data in support of the assessment.

Traffic Counts
Peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected on a day with fair weather while school was in session. Peak hour traffic counts are presented on Figure 2 in Appendix B. Traffic counts were collected at the following City intersections:
o Avenida Pico & El Camino Real (Signalized)
o Avenida Estacion & El Camino Real (Signalized)
o Avenida Pico & Calle Deshecha (Two-Way Stop Control)
o Avenida Pico & Avenida Vista Hermosa (Signalized)
Cumulative Development Projects
Fehr & Peers requested Pending and approved development project information (within two miles of the Project) from the City of San Clemente. Projects were included in the future forecasting if they were expected to be completed and in operation by the Project’s opening year (2026).

The “Miramar Events Center” (Miramar) project that is under construction directly Southeast of the Hansen Hotel and has the greatest effect on traffic forecasting. An OC Register article1 identified the last readily available description of the Miramar’s parking situation utilized in project trip routing. As the Miramar may use existing parking southwest of Avenida Pico and Calle Deshecha, parking access is assumed to be at the northern driveway of the parking lot along Calle Deshecha and at the eastern driveway along Avenida Pico. A local news outlet2 identifies the most
readily available square footage estimates utilized to forecast vehicle trips which were incorporated into the Opening Year for analysis.

Trip Generation
Trip generation rates from Trip Generation, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers [ITE], 2021) for Hotel (ITE Code 310), Fine Dining (ITE Code 931), and Café (Public Walk-Up) (ITE Code 936) were used to represent the Project. Trip generation rates are presented in Table 1 and used 1 https://web.archive.org/web/20240313041743/https://www.ocregister.com/2017/06/14/shuttered-for-25- years-san-clementes-historic-miramar-theater-moves-closer-to-new-life-as-events-center/ 2 https://web.archive.org/web/20240525141242/https://www.picketfencemedia.com/sanclementetimes/eyeon-sc/miramar-theater-soon-up-for-sale-again/article_df009b4e-0efa-11ef-9555-03cfde1c816a.html

ATTACHMENT A
1125
Jorden Segraves
January 17, 2025

Page 3 of 8 ends

to estimate the daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trips associated with the Project in Table

2. Table 1: The Hansen Hotel Trip Generation Rates
Land Use ITE Land
Use Code Units Daily Rate
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate In Out Rate In Out
Hotel 310 Rooms 7.99 0.46 56% 44% 0.59 51% 49%
Fine Dining 931 KSF 83.84 0.73 - - 7.80 67% 33%
Café (Public Walk-Up) 936 KSF - 93.08 51% 49% 32.29 50% 50% Notes:

1.KSF = 1,000 square feet

2. Sources: Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021) Table 2: Project Trip Generation Estimates
Land Use ITE Land
Use Code Units Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Hotel 310 Rooms 487 16 12 28 18 18 36
Fine Dining 931 KSF 213 2 0 2 13 7 20
Café (Public Walk-Up) 936 KSF 931 14 13 27 5 4 9
Total Trip Generation 1,631 32 25 57 36 29 65
ITE’s Fine Dining (Land Use Code 931) does not provide an AM in and out distribution, so the trips generated for the AM peak are assumed as early morning preparation and management.

Additionally, ITE’s Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through Window (Land Use Code 936) does not have a daily trip generation rate and was estimated by applying a 10% K-factor to the highest peak hour (AM) to estimate daily trips.

As presented in Table 2, the Project is expected to generate approximately 1,631 daily trips, including 57 trips (32 in/25 out) in the AM peak hour and 65 trips (36 in/29 out) in the PM peak hour.

This trip generation estimate is considered conservative as no trip internalization credits nor passby trip reductions have been applied to the trip generation, despite the project being within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) and proposing a San Clemente Trolley stop in front of the hotel.

ATTACHMENT A
1126

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 21, 2026
HANSON HOTEL - MP22-324

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Attachment 5
1127

IN SUPPORT
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137

OPPOSED
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159

OPPOSED
Same Comments
Grouped by Subject
with list of Signees
Please note comments submitted
more than once.
1160

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Grant the Appeal and Ensure Commonsense VMT/Traffic Mitigations in the Hanson Hotel Project
Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
I urge you to grant the appeal and appropriately study the impact on traffic and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) that will be caused by the Hanson Hotel Project. The project relies on a 1998 traffic study done using a significantly different (“level of service”) type of analysis as part of a different project that involved 27 timeshares and 10,000 square feet of retail space. The proposal argues that this new 61 room hotel and rooftop bar project is less intensive than the old proposal.

I do not agree. The old traffic analysis is based on a different type of analysis (“level of service”) rather than vehicle miles traveled. The Planning Commission staff report on the hotel project said that it would generate 1,631 daily trips, compared to the 620 daily trips generated by the old timeshare project.

Additionally, the 27 timeshare units in the 1998 project are less than half the number of hotel rooms proposed here. Timeshares usually involve longer stays as compared to hotels, suggesting that this new hotel project might create more frequent trips and more impacts.

The project does not attempt enough simple and straightforward mitigations that would reduce vehicle trips.

Please grant the appeal and ensure an appropriate VMT study is conducted.

Signed by:

1. Shirley Xiao 12/28/25

2. Noriko Mukae 12/25/25

3. Narendrakumar Bhakta 12/12/25

4. Tim Murphy 12/11/25

5. Lenna McClennen 12/11/25*

6. Kathleen Armenteros 12/11/25*

7. Mike Frost 12/10/25

8. George Dutra 12/10/25

9. Anthony Evans 12/9/25

10. Gina Moritz 12/9/25

11. Heather Carrick 12/9/25

12. Scott Henderson 12/9/25

13. Nimisha Bhakta 12/9/25

14. MM Babbitt 12/9/25

15. Krista Humphrey 12/9/25
1161

16. Stacey Finnerty 12/9/25

17. Nancy Wheeler 12/9/25

18. Stephany Rivera 12/9/25

19. Karen Carlsen 12/9/25

20. Stop Stop

21. Laurel Jiron 12/9/215

22. Sara Kennedy 12/9/25

23. Scot Jones 12/9/25

24. Sierra Corbridge 12/9/25

25. Ken Kaefer 12/9/25

26. June Steffey 12/9/25

27. Samuel Tuscano 12/9/25

28. Nichole Palo 12/9/25

29. Suzanne Wagner 12/9/25

30. Alica Cali 12/9/25
*Signed Two Emails
1162

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Grant the Appeal and Ensure Commonsense VMT/Traffic Mitigations in this Project Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
This is an horrible idea that will ruin our community entirely! I urge you to grant the appeal and appropriately study the impact on traffic and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) that will be caused by project. The project relies on a 1998 traffic study done using a significantly different (“level of service”) type of analysis as part of a different project that involved 27 timeshares and 10,000 square feet of retail space. The proposal argues that this new 61 room hotel and rooftop bar project is less intensive than the old proposal.

I do not agree. The old traffic analysis is based on a different type of analysis (“level of service”) rather than vehicle miles traveled. The Planning Commission staff report on the hotel project said that it would generate 1,631 daily trips, compared to the 620 daily trips generated by the old timeshare project.

Additionally, the 27 timeshare units in the 1998 project are less than half the number of hotel rooms proposed here. Timeshares usually involve longer stays as compared to hotels, suggesting that this new hotel project might create more frequent trips and more impacts.

The project does not attempt enough simple and straightforward mitigations that would reduce vehicle trips.

Please grant the appeal and ensure an appropriate VMT study is conducted.

Signed by:

1. Swetlana Schmidt 12/9/25

2. Chace Paddack 12/9/25

3. Ellen Chambell 12/9/25

4. Melanie Osorio 12/9/25

5. Tony Roxstrom 12/9/25

6. Michelle Moon 12/9/25

7. Brittany Orahood 12/8/25

8. Susana Lobos 12/8/25

9. Scott Wigglesworth 12/8/25

10. Chase Worden 12/8/25

11. Emiley Gregory 12/8/25

12. Daniela Lutz 12/8/25
1163

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: No more rooftop bars in this neighborhood
Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
ANOTHER hotel project at the Outlets Mall project was just approved about a half mile away. Do you think we need more hotels in this neighborhood? What are the cumulative noise impacts of multiple rooftop bars?
I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed By:

1. James Barlow 12/8/25

2. J. Coleman 12/8/25

3. Kim Carr 12/8/25

4. Ramiro Aguirre 12/8/25

5. Kasey Hume 12/8/25

6. Jeffrey Wiant

7. Fatemeh KIarami 12/8/25

8. Roberto Herrera 12/8/25

9. Hannah McClain 12/8/25

10. Susan Curry 12/8/25
1164

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: No more rooftop bars in this neighborhood, please grant appeal of Hanson Hotel project Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
ANOTHER hotel project at the Outlets Mall project was just approved about a half mile away. Do you think we need more hotels in this neighborhood? What are the cumulative noise impacts of multiple rooftop bars?
I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed by:

1. Beatrice Yuan 1/11/26

2. Julie Siff 12/12/25

3. Dana Duarte 12/10/25

4. Keith Shane 12/10/25

5. Martha Huskey 12/10/25

6. Michelle Lincoln 12/10/25

7. Maria Murillo 12/10/25

8. George Sutherland 12/10/25

9. Thuy Lee 12/10/25

10. Dale Philippi 12/10/25

11. Nancy Hartnett 12/9/25

12. Jenne Robitaille 12/9/25

13. Gwen Kennedy 12/9/25

14. Richard Peach 12/9/25

15. Terry Lawrence 12/9/25**

16. Ashley Bracamonte 12/9/25

17. Darlene Croft 12/9/25

18. Meka Diggs 12/9/25

19. James Rooke 12/9/25

20. Heaven Leiva 12/9/25

21. Justine Micklin 12/9/25

22. Rose Delloye 12/9/25

23. Brandon Marano 12/9/25

24. Andrew Krieger 12/9/25

25. Kasey Coppola 12/9/25
**Signed Three Emails
1165

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Protect the California Gnatcatcher, Support the appeal Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
Please support the appeal of the Hanson Hotel. Gnatcatchers can be found at the trails at the nearby Sea Summit and Pico Park at the bluff just above the site. The site becomes quiet in the evening without the hotel, which could be of great benefit to the wildlife there.

I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed by:

1. ALAN HORNALL 12/9/25

2. Anne Thiele 12/9/25

3. Carol Luetz 12/9/25

4. Ann Tomlinson 12/9/25

5. Stephanie Curry 12/8/25

6. Jake Stahlman 12/8/25
1166

HANSON HOTEL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED IN PLANNING INBOX SUBJECT: Protect the California Gnatcatcher, Support the appeal of the Hanson Hotel Hon. Mayor and Councilmembers,
Please support the appeal of the Hanson Hotel. Gnatcatchers can be found at the trails at the nearby Sea Summit and Pico Park at the bluff just above the site. The site becomes quiet in the evening without the hotel, which could be of great benefit to the wildlife there.

I do not support a rooftop bar at this location. Please grant the appeal.

Signed by:

1. Donna D’Ottavio 1/19/26

2. Hana Liu 12/25/26

3. Turi Daniels 12/19/25

4. Tracey Canziani 12/18/25

5. Terry Lawrence 12/16/25 & 12/14/25

6. Cyndi Larson 12/13/25

7. Marge Donohue 12/13/25

8. Ramona Daly 12/12/25

9. Jerome Pajor 12/10/25

10. Reina Myers 12/10/25

11. Kathleen Armenteros 12/10/25*

12. Sarah Nowels 12/9/25

13. Pauline Faye 12/9/25

14. Lilly Dunbar 12/9/25

15. Allison Waite 12/9/25

16. Esen Koen 12/9/25

17. Dan Giese 12/9/25

18. Jeff Carrete 12/9/25

19. Jennifer Johnson 12/9/25

20. Teri Jones Castro 12/9/25

21. Theodore Sanders 12/9/25

22. Janice Rabel 12/9/25

23. Teresa Zoerner 12/9/25

24. Sheryl Martinez 12/9/25

25. Jack McIver 12/9/25

26. Phyllis Tracy
*Signed Two Different Emails
1167
April 11, 2026
Laura Campagnolo, City Clerk, City of San Clemente
Via: [email protected]
Hello, Laura:

Thanks in advance for forwarding this letter of support for the Hanson Hotel project to all City Council members, hearing slated for this coming April 21st.

As a longstanding business and pioneer in the rebirth of the historic North Beach area, our Casino San Clemente event center has long awaited a complimentary use on the vacant corner of Pico and ECR. That corner has only been a magnet for vagrancy, vandalism and in season, the blot of political signs on the chain link fence.

With the opening of the Miramar to Wedgewood, the City of San Clemente has the potential to welcome even more first time visitors and with the Hanson Hotel, would have additional potential for these visitors to stay locally and further explore this historic seaside village.

As a designer/developer ourselves, we can empathize with the time, monies and investment to date this owner has devoted with a responsible, esthetically beautiful and complimentary offering to this City. We hope the powers that be appreciate the still long road ahead in development and City processes to realize this project. We commend the owners for their foresight and vision.

We wholeheartedly support this beautiful and complimentary addition to North Beach. It will benefit us all.

Linda Sadeghi
[email protected]
1168
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

Submitted By: Planning Division
Prepared By: Zach Rehm, Acting City Planner
Alexia Gruszczynski, Assistant Planner
Subject:
..titl e

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER INTRODUCING, AND CONDUCTING A FIRST READING OF, ORDINANCE NO. 1804, FOR THE CONTINUANCE OF THE TEMPORARY PARKLET

PROGRAM AND AN AMENDMENT OF THE PARKLET DESIGN STANDARDS AND TO

CONSIDER THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ..body
Summary:

On March 17, 2026, the City Council reviewed streamlining and cleanup batch amendments to the Municipal Code, with a recommendation from the Planning Commission to address the Temporary Parklet Program separately from those batch amendments. At that meeting, staff presented information about parklet operations, fees, enforcement, and design. The City Council directed staff to review the parklet program and solicit design recommendations from the Design Review Subcommittee. In order to implement feedback from the Design Review Subcommittee and program changes proposed by staff, a Zoning Amendment is recommended following a public hearing.

The Zoning Amendment and supporting Parklet Design Standards would update the parklet program review process, fees, design, operational standards, and include an extension to align with Assembly Bill 592 which enables local governments to authorize parklet operations through January 1, 2029, subject to State waivers of certain alcohol standards, food service standards, and building standards.

While originally established as a temporary economic recovery measure, the parklet program has evolved into a broader policy question regarding the balance between outdoor dining, public parking availability, and the overall character of the City’s downtown and commercial areas. The proposed Ordinance would continue the program through January 1, 2029, while introducing clearer operational and design standards intended to reduce visual clutter, improve consistency, and better align the program with current community expectations. City Council consideration of this item will determine whether, and in what form, parklets remain a component of the City’s public right-of-way.

Background:

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of San Clemente chose to implement outdoor dining in support of local restaurant businesses. On June 2, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution 20-41 which authorized and directed the Director of Emergency Services to implement certain zoning-related small business assistance strategies including the permitting of outdoor 1169
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
dining to help businesses operate safely and successfully following social distancing and other guidelines. Additionally, City Council adopted Resolution 21-19 proclaiming a Local Emergency Regarding Economic Stabilization and Recovery from the impacts of the Coronavirus Pandemic, finding that small businesses have been disproportionately impacted by the effects of the pandemic and by closures or operational modifications mandated by the State or County Health Departments. Cities relied on local emergency orders to implement and maintain these programs, and the State legislature subsequently enacted legislation to authorize the continuation of outdoor dining programs beyond the duration of local emergency declarations.

Later in 2021, the City Council directed staff to initiate a Zoning Amendment to establish a new Temporary Outdoor Dining Program as promoted by AB 61 and SB 314. The proposed regulations and design guidelines were discussed by the City’s Design Review Subcommittee (DRSC) on December 15, 2021 and January 12, 2022 and by the Planning Commission on February 16, 2022. In March of 2022, City Council held a public hearing to consider Ordinance 1727 and the establishment of a Temporary Parklet Program Participation fee and adopted the Ordinance on April 5, 2022, consistent with AB 61 and SB 314 which extended the program through December 31, 2023, subject to the standards of San Clemente Municipal Code Section

17.28.206. Figures 1 and 2, below, provide images of typical parklets that exist in the City under Current program standards.

Figure 1
1170
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3
Figure 2
In October of 2023, the State passed AB 1217, which extended the parklet program through July 1, 2026. The City Council directed staff to initiate Zoning Amendment 23-424 in December of 2023 to consider extending the Temporary Outdoor Dining Program, and in early 2024, the City Council held a public hearing and adopted Ordinance 1772 to approve the extension as permitted by AB 1217.

In late 2025, the State passed AB 592, which continued the authorization of local outdoor dining programs, and presented a new termination date of January 1, 2029. On March 17, 2026, City Staff presented Council with information on the parklet operations, fees, enforcement, and design standards, and the City Council directed staff to initiate a Zoning Amendment to amend, and consider extending, the Temporary Parklet Program governed by SCMC Section 17.28.206 through January 1, 2029. The proposed regulations and design standards were reviewed by the DRSC on March 25, 2026 and at a special meeting on April 1, 2026. The minutes for these meetings are provided as Attachments 5 and 6 and included public comment as well as design recommendations from the Committee-members.

Additionally, the DRSC discussed a variety of alternatives for the parklet program, one of which was identified as a beautification opportunity within the T-Zone (Avenida Del Mar and parts of El Camino Real) and Pier Bowl. The DRSC expressed that if the parklet program is continued, it should be on a limited basis (possibly expiring Labor Day 2026) and then before resuming in a new form, it should be reviewed by the full Planning Commission in the context of the General Plan, and potential downtown beautification investments before the 2028 Olympics. The DRSC recommended beautification focus on cost-effective, high-impact improvements through maintenance, targeted refresh programs, and technical support to enhance visual quality, preserve historic character, and deliver visible results. The DRSC further recommended the creation of a beautification plan to prioritize repairs, cleanup, and reduced visual clutter, together with cohesive public realm upgrades such as wayfinding signage and Mediterranean-style 1171
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 4
landscaping. A key element could be the implementation of a “Spanish Village Refresh” grant program offering small incentives and streamlined approvals for minor upgrades like painting and façade improvements, supported by a pre-approved Spanish Colonial Revival color palette for faster permitting.

In summary, the program was initiated to help restaurant owners overcome economic hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic, aiming to support business continuity and sustain economic development during an unprecedented disruption. With the expiration of pandemic-related regulations that once imposed significant operational constraints on restaurants, the context in which the program was created has changed, although many residents and visitors have expressed enthusiasm for outdoor dining, and restaurant and café owners have expressed strong desire to continue participating in the program and paying for the use of public right-of-way.

Given that context, the proposed updates to the Zoning Code and the proposed Parklet Design Standards are not intended as reactive measures to a past crisis, but rather as proactive enhancements to San Clemente’s street life and urban design aesthetic. The recommended design and operational standards would strengthen the program’s long-term effectiveness and better align it with current economic conditions and community goals.

Discussion:

Several changes are recommended to improve the program’s consistency and compatibility in standards, design, enforcement, and fees across the three parklet types: (1) angled parking spaces on Avenida Del Mar, (2) parallel parking spaces on other streets such as Avenida Victoria, and (3) parking spaces on private property. The changes described are also identified in the proposed Zoning Amendment (Attachment 1, Exhibit A) and the proposed Parklet Design Standards (Attachment 1, Exhibit B).

Location and Dimension Standards:

The current Parklet program permits a variety of parklet styles and designs. Updated standards would provide clear direction related to: location, limitations, dimensions, buffer zones, fire safety requirements, and accessibility. The following are operational changes recommended by staff, generally supported by DRSC (with alternative recommendations noted):

General Requirements:
 Parklets shall be located directly in front of, and limited to the frontage of, the business associated with the Parklet and shall not extend into or obstruct the frontage of any adjacent business.
 Parklets shall not encroach into and interfere with the use of adjoining sidewalk.  Business must submit building owner approval (DRSC further recommends that City staff provide written notice to neighboring owner/tenants on either side of the proposed parklet space).
 All parklets are required to build their space to the specifications of Parklet Design Standards. If parklet operators propose a design outside of the standards, their application would be subject to Planning Commission review.
1172
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 5
 Parklets may be established on private property and shall not result in the loss of more than two required parking spaces, unless otherwise permitted by applicable zoning regulations. Parklets on private property shall be subject to the design standards for parklets established on Avenida Del Mar.
 Parklets shall require a three-foot wide buffer zone that spans the entire length of the parklet facing the street.
 The three-foot buffer zone shall be occupied with concrete planters as specified in the Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement. The planters must be spaced a minimum of five feet on center, or a minimum of four planters for each parklet, whichever results in more planters.
 Plants in the planters shall be kept in a healthy condition and are the responsibility of the business owner. These plants shall, when considered fully grown, be no taller than 18 inches above the planter.
 Plants shall be California Native and drought tolerant, or succulents. Parklet operators shall reference the Plant Palette included in the Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement.  There shall be a minimum of three inches of clear space below and around the dining deck to accommodate parklet cleaning for all types of parklets. There shall be a baseboard that is removeable or incorporates a hidden hinge, to allow for cleaning access underneath the parklet.
 The deck surface may be a maximum of 12 inches above the ground. If necessary, decks may be stepped to follow the slope of the street to maintain this height limit.  It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to provide outdoor dining in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) requirements, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) requirements, and utilize best management practices (BMPs) to avoid pollution.  Dimensions of the parklet and parking spaces shall be specified on the plans.  Before operations can begin, each parklet must receive final approval, via an inspection, by Planning Division to certify that the standards are fulfilled.

Angled Parking Space Requirements on Avenida Del Mar:
 Parklets on angled spaces shall utilize portions of up to three angled parking spaces, however, the parklet dining deck area shall be limited to the width of two parking spaces (DRSC recommended occupation of two spaces maximum, without residual area). This results in parklets as shown in Figure 3, below.
 The residual area of the occupied angled parking spaces shall be dedicated to e-bike or golf cart parking (DRSC did not recommend designating golf cart parking). 1173
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 6
 A maximum of ten parklets may be established on Avenida Del Mar. This limitation was previously set at a maximum of 14 parklets (resulting in the utilization of up to 42 parking spaces), while the most that have been operational at the same time was 11. The ten parklet maximum equates to the utilization of up to 30 spaces (but may be less as described in the next bullet point), which is 19% of the on-street parking stock (160 spaces) for Avenida Del Mar and 3% of the downtown public parking stock (1014 spaces).  No more than five consecutive parking spaces may be occupied by parklets on Avenida Del Mar (DRSC recommended no consecutive parklets, although businesses could share a parklet). Staff recommends this approach because there is an efficiency created by having two parklets, each two parking spaces wide, placed next to each other as they combine two of the triangular portions that would otherwise result from their independent placement.

This results in the utilization of five total parking spaces when two parklets are directly adjacent to each other, where six parking spaces would be required should they be placed non-consecutively.
 Unless placed consecutively, as described above, parklets shall be required to provide a minimum distance from any other parklet of at least three parking spaces when located on Avenida Del Mar.
 Parklets on angled spaces shall be designed to allow egress from vehicles that park in adjacent stall. Parklets shall be designed to maintain a minimum two-foot clear area from the parking space marking on either side of the parklet, except for the rear corners adjacent to the sidewalk.

Figure 3
1174
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 7
Parallel Parking Space Requirements Elsewhere:
 Outside of Avenida Del Mar, a maximum of five parklets total may be established throughout the City on public property. Currently there is no maximum City-wide; only on Avenida Del Mar.
 Parklets on parallel spaces shall occupy a maximum of two spaces, as shown in Figure 4, below.
 Unless placed consecutively, as described above, parklets shall be required to provide a minimum distance from any other parklet of at least one parking space when located on streets with parallel parking.

Figure 4
Aesthetic Design:

The updated design requirements for this program provide clear direction on barrier materials, furniture material and color, lighting types and locations, bike rack location and materials, shade and heating item quantity and design, and prohibited elements. The following are design changes recommended by Staff:
 Eliminate the posts that extend vertically beyond the horizontal line of the guardrail.  Lighting shall be integrated into the parklet either under the railing or under the umbrellas (the DRSC did not recommend lighting under the umbrellas). Lighting shall be solar or battery powered.
 Parklets shall be constructed of Cedar or Douglas Fir with a dark brown stain (Hex Color Code #6A5143) and 36” high safety railings with horizontal metal cables, spaced 4 inches apart between the deck surface and the railing.
1175
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 8
 Bike racks shall be incorporated within the residual parking space area; material shall be black powder-coated tubular steel or wrought iron.
 Umbrellas shall be dark green in color (Hex Color Code #2A4E43). They shall be limited to a maximum of two per parklet where the combined canopy coverage does not exceed 90 square feet per parklet. The umbrella height shall be no taller than seven feet from the deck surface.
 Heaters (i.e., portable propane heaters) shall be no taller than five feet from the deck surface.

Propane shall be kept within the internal boundaries of the parklet, and not visible from the street or sidewalk.
 Outdoor furniture shall be uniform in color; a dark color (i.e., brown or black) is required.  Prohibited items include but are not limited to: pop up tents; overhead elements, lattice (wood or plastic); plastic or vinyl fences, trellises or furniture; excessive decoration; elevated string lighting; tall walls, plants, or other accessories over five feet in height; banner signs; any other items exceeding the height of the barrier railing; and storage of any items not in current use as part of the approved parklet operations.

Additional DRSC Recommendations on Standards and Design The following are design recommendations from DRSC, some of which differ from the staff recommendations above and the last two of which differ from initial Council direction:
 Parklets on angled spaces should occupy a maximum of two parking spaces. The parklet dining deck shall fit within the dimensions of 2 spaces. This results in parklets as shown in Figure 5, below.
 For parklets that have restaurant operations side-by-side, there should be one combined parklet for both businesses.
 Restaurants that have existing, permanent, outdoor dining areas should not be permitted to have a parklet. Staff notes that the majority of the current parklets are operated by businesses that provide on-site outdoor dining areas.
 Parklets should have a minimum of four operational parking spaces in-between other parklets.

Parklets shall not be side-by-side.
 There should be a minimum of six inches of clear space below and around the dining deck to accommodate parklet cleaning for all types of parklets. There should be galvanized steel flashing around the clearance under the parklet.
 Parklets should be limited to one single post umbrella. The umbrella height should be no taller than eight feet from the top of the parklet’s deck surface.  Eliminate the allowance for signs of the parklet business and adjacent businesses on the parklet facing the street.
1176
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 9
 Do not move forward with the kiosk concept along public rights of way.

Figure 5
Fees:

Parklet operators receive a bill quarterly and can pay online or via check. To establish collection of the fees, all parklets enter into a Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement which addresses fees established by the City Council in 2022. As the program evolved over the years, the size of parklets has changed and the originally established fee structure no longer consistently reflects the actual size and configuration of parklets. Staff recommends the price per square foot remain the same as has already been established in the Zoning Code and future invoices be based on the actual size of each parklet rather than an estimated average fee per quarter. Since the proposed standardized site plan reduces the size of all parklets, there will be a slight decrease in total revenue in comparison to prior years. Staff have received feedback from business owners that it would be helpful for their operations to be able to pay monthly by electronic payment, and staff are reviewing available software and employee capacity to accommodate this.

Fee Schedule:
 Public Property (includes angled and parallel spaces): $4 per square foot  Private Property: $1 per square foot
Enforcement
The City currently responds to parklet-related issues primarily through typical complaint-driven enforcement. However, variations in design and incremental modifications over time have resulted in inconsistencies between approved plans and the current conditions. With the introduction of objective standards, as opposed to encouraged design guidelines, the parklets will be regulated based on specific criteria with limited flexibility. This allows for simplified reviews during the project application submittal process, simplified inspections by Planning staff upon parklet construction, simplified enforcement for Code Compliance staff, and clarity for business owners to maintain a compliant parklet. Under the updated program, the Code Compliance Division will conduct periodic inspections, in addition to responding to complaints to ensure ongoing compliance.
1177
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 10
Existing Parklets:

It is the recommendation of staff to enforce the new Parklet Design Standards for all existing parklets after July 1, 2026. Should the City Council introduce the proposed ordinance on April 21, 2026, and adopt the ordinance upon a second reading on May 5, 2026, the effective date of the new regulations would occur on June 4, 2026. Between June 4 and July 1, 2026, parklet operators who wish to continue in the parklet program may submit applications under the new standards.

A grace period will be established for submittals during this time to allow such operators’ existing parklets to remain until a new Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement is obtained, provided the application for a new Parklet Dining Permit is properly submitted online through the City’s eTrakit Portal before July 1, 2026. In these cases, upon issuance of a new permit, the parklet will be required to be removed and replaced, modified to meet the new standards, or simply removed, in a timely manner (i.e. two weeks). Once these businesses finish construction and related documents are finalized, permittees shall schedule an inspection with Planning Division staff for final approval.

Existing parklet operators who do not wish to continue under the program will be required to remove their parklets on, or before, July 1, 2026. Failure to comply with any of the requirements discussed in this subsection will result in removal of the operator’s parklet by the City and such costs to be the responsibility of the parklet operator, as well as any other administrative or legal remedies available to the City.

New Parklets:

New parklet applications will be subject to the new Parklet Design Standards and could be submitted starting June 5, 2026. Due to the proposed reduction of the overall number parklets permitted in the program, staff will review new parklets on a first-come first-served basis.

Public Comments
Public comments on the parklet program are mixed. Some commenters at the prior City Council meeting supported the program with no changes, while others at that meeting and the two DRSC meetings expressed support dependent on significant revisions to parklet size, parking considerations, and process. Public comments reflected a range of perspectives, including support for the continuation of the program with modifications, as well as concerns regarding parking loss, visibility of adjacent businesses, and program consistency. Public commenters supported the DRSC recommendations for improved design standards, reduced scale, better maintenance, and stronger enforcement.

Considerations Identified by Staff:

The current parklet program reflects standards developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the primary objective was to facilitate social distancing and support business continuity. As those conditions have changed, the City Council’s consideration includes whether the program should continue as a longer-term feature of the public right-of-way, and if so, under what constraints.

The proposed modifications are intended to reduce visual clutter, maintain the availability of public parking, and improve consistency in design and operations. 1178
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 11
Upon review of the current regulations, staff has identified several modifications that will improve the current program, including:
 Current regulations allow the total number of parklets of 14 on Avenida Del Mar, which could occupy 42 parking spaces. However, currently, only nine parklets are operating on Avenida Del Mar. The maximum number of parklets would be reduced to ten, or a maximum of 30 parking spaces on Avenida Del Mar. Additionally, other parklets on public property would be limited to a total of five, which would permit a total of 15 parklets on public property throughout the City.
 Due to the angled parking along Avenida Del Mar, there are small triangular portions of the parklets that are underutilized by the current design. These portions could be utilized for ebike or golf cart parking, which the proposed designs and planter placements would facilitate.  Parklets would be limited to directly in front of the business space. This would help address visual impacts for neighboring businesses.
 Parklets would have a standardized design, which includes the implementation of a uniform size for parklets on angled spaces (i.e., Avenida Del Mar) and parallel spaces (i.e., Avenida Victoria). This would enhance visual compatibility along highly trafficked streets and reduce discrepancies in fees. Current regulations permit a variety of different materials for construction which increases visual clutter. A standardized design coordinates the visual atmosphere along influential areas of the City.
 Any existing parklet operators interested in continuing in the program submit a new Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement with the amended fee schedule by July 1, 2026, and then subsequently have the parklet reconstructed to conform to the Parklet Design Standards soon thereafter. This aligns with the current termination date, when businesses are already anticipating changes. Upon completion of construction, the parklets would coordinate an inspection with Planning Division staff to ensure compliance. This reduces the possibility of nonconforming parklets and assists in enforcement and implementation of the updated program.

Council Options:
 Conduct the public hearing, and introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1804 (Attachment 1) approving the Zoning Amendment (Attachment 1, Exhibit A) and adopting the updated Parklet Design Standards (Attachment 1, Exhibit B) and finding the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; or
 Continue the item with direction to staff to revise the Zoning Amendment or provide additional information; or
 Decline to introduce the ordinance, which would result in the Temporary Parklet Dining Program terminating on July 1, 2026.
1179
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 12
Environmental Review/Analysis:

The proposed zoning amendment constitutes a regulatory action governing the use and design of temporary parklets within existing public rights-of-way and on private property. The project does not authorize any new physical expansion of roadway infrastructure or intensification of use beyond what is already permitted under existing zoning and prior program approvals. Rather, it refines and standardizes operational, dimensional, and design requirements for structures that are accessory to existing commercial uses.

The project is therefore Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections § 15321: Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies, as the amendments establish and enforce objective standards governing existing uses to ensure consistency and compliance. In addition, the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section § 15311: Accessory Structures, as parklets are minor, temporary structures accessory to existing commercial uses and located within previously developed urban areas.

Furthermore, the proposed amendments represent a minor modification to existing regulations that will not result in a significant expansion of the program’s footprint or intensity. The amendments reduce allowable parklet sizes, establish a cap on the total number of parklets, and introduce standardized design requirements, all of which serve to limit potential impacts rather than expand them. As such, the project does not have the potential to result in a significant effect on the environment.

Fiscal Impact:

The annual fees generated by the Parklet Program ranges from $160,000 to $184,000 and collected funds are placed into the General Fund. By introducing standard dimensions and thorough inspections, staff will implement an accurate price per square foot calculation which will adjust the fee collection slightly per parklet, likely resulting in a minimal reduction in revenues.

Staff recommends the City Council authorize these fees to be utilized for leases of private downtown parking lots for free public use and augmenting free trolley operations during special events when parking is most in demand. The proposed use of parklet-generated revenue for public parking and transportation enhancements in intended to offset the impacts of reduced onstreet parking associated with the parklet program.

Recommended Action(s):
..recommendation
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council do the following:

1. Determine the Ordinance Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections § 15321:

Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies, and Section § 15311: Accessory Structures; and

2. Introduce, and conduct a first reading by title only, of Ordinance No. 1804 entitled “AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 17.28.206 OF THE SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1180
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8B.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 13

REGULATING TEMPORARY PARKLET DINING, WHICH ESTABLISHES STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR DINING AREAS AND SUNSETS ON JANUARY 1, 2029; AND FINDING THIS

ACTION EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15311 AND 15321.”
..end
Attachments:

1. Ordinance No. 1804
a. Exhibit A – Zoning Amendment (Clean Copy)
b. Exhibit B – Parklet Design Standards

2. Redline Changes to SCMC 17.28.206, Temporary Parklet Dining

3. Existing Parklet Design Guidelines

4. DRSC Draft Meeting Minutes - March 25, 2026

5. DRSC Draft Meeting Minutes - April 1, 2026

6. Public Comments
Notification:

Public notices for the zoning amendment were distributed and posted per City and State requirements. Public comments have been received and are provided in Attachment 6. ..recommendation
..end
1181
Attachment 1
Att 1 - Ordinance 26-144 (Parklets) 4909-2392-9249 v.1.docx ORDINANCE NO. 1804

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION

17.28.206 OF THE SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL CODE,

REGULATING TEMPORARY PARKLET DINING, WHICH

ESTABLISHES STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR DINING
AREAS AND SUNSETS ON JANUARY 1, 2029; AND

FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15311 AND 15321
WHEREAS, after the 2021 legislative session, the Governor of the State of California signed into law various bills supporting small businesses, including AB 61 and SB 314, which provide regulatory flexibility in the service areas for alcohol and relief from parking standards while encouraging local agencies to adopt ordinances and regulations as are herein proposed that streamline the approval for outdoor dining; and WHEREAS, on November 16, 2021, the City Council directed staff to initiate a Zoning Amendment to establish a new temporary outdoor dining program as promoted by AB 61 and SB 314; and
WHEREAS, proposed regulations and design guidelines were discussed by the City’s Design Review Subcommittee (DRSC) on December 15, 2021 and January 12, 2022 and also by the Planning Commission on February 16, 2022; and WHEREAS, March 2, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the zoning amendment, and considered evidence presented by City staff and other interested parties and recommended approval of the zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on Ordinance 1727 and adopted the ordinance on April 5, 2022 upon its second reading of San Clemente Municipal Code (SCMC) section 17.28.206, which expired, consistent with AB 61 and SB 314 on December 31, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed into law AB 1217 after the 2023 legislative session, which extends the framework for outdoor dining facilities until July 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2023, the City Council initiated a Zoning Amendment to consider extending the Parklet Program governed by SCMC section 17.28.206 for Temporary Outdoor Dining until July 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing regarding Zoning Amendment 23-424 and considered the facts and evidence presented within the staff report and by any interested member of the public 1182
Ordinance No. 1804 Page 2
and recommended that the City Council approve Zoning Amendment 23-424; and WHEREAS, on January 16, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing regarding Ordinance 1772 and adopted the ordinance on February 6, 2024 upon its second reading of San Clemente Municipal Code (SCMC) section 17.28.206, which expires, consistent with AB 1217 on July 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed into law AB 592 after the 2025 legislative session, which continued the authorization of local outdoor dining programs, and presents a new termination date of January 1, 2029 WHEREAS, on March 17, 2026, the City Council directed staff to initiate a Zoning Amendment, review parklet design standards with the City’s Design Review Subcommittee, and return to the next available City Council meeting to review an amendment the temporary outdoor dining program standards and design and an extension of the program consistent with AB 592; and
WHEREAS, amended regulations and design standards were presented to the City’s Design Review Subcommittee on March 25, 2026, public comment and Committee-member feedback were received, and revisions were presented at another Design Review Subcommittee meeting on April 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing regarding Zoning Amendment 26-132 and considered the facts and evidence presented with the staff report, the recommendations of the Design Review Subcommittee, and testimony by any interested members of the public.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE DOES DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Incorporation of Recitals.

The City Council hereby finds that all of the facts in the Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated and adopted as findings of the Planning Commission as fully set forth in this resolution.

SECTION 2: CEQA Findings.

Based upon its review of the entire record, including the staff report, any public comments or testimony presented to the City Council, and the facts outlined below, the City Council determines that Zoning Amendment 26-132 constitutes a regulatory action governing the use and design of temporary parklets within existing public rights-of-way and on private property. The project does not authorize any new physical expansion of roadway infrastructure or intensification of use beyond what is already permitted under existing zoning and prior program approvals. Rather, it refines and standardizes operational, 1183
Ordinance No. 1804 Page 3
dimensional, and design requirements for structures that are accessory to existing commercial uses.

The project is therefore Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section15321:

Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies, as the amendments establish and enforce objective standards governing existing uses to ensure consistency and compliance. In addition, the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15311: Accessory Structures, as parklets are minor, temporary structures accessory to existing commercial uses and located within previously developed urban areas.

Furthermore, the proposed amendments represent a minor modification to existing regulations that will not result in a significant expansion of the program’s footprint or intensity. The amendments reduce allowable parklet sizes, establish a cap on the total number of parklets, and introduce standardized design requirements, all of which serve to limit potential impacts rather than expand them. As such, the project does not have the potential to result in a significant effect on the environment.

None of the exceptions to the use of categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply are present, as the project will not result in cumulative impacts, significant effects due to unusual circumstances, impacts to scenic resources, hazardous waste sites, or historical resources.

SECTION 3: Zoning Amendment Findings
With respect to Zoning Amendment 26-132, the City Council finds as follows:

A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and numerous General Plan Policies, such as:
 LU-11.03. Flexibility. We allow flexibility to accommodate market changes for the mix of uses identified in the Del Mar/T-Zone Mixed Use Guide, if doing so promotes achieving the Area’s vision and improves livability, reduces vehicular trips, creates community gathering places and activity nodes, or helps strengthen its character and identity.
 LU-11.04. Outdoor Dining. We encourage the development of outdoor dining and other similar uses which do not impeded pedestrian use of the sidewalks.  LU-11.05. Bike and Pedestrian Environment. We provide a high-quality bicycle and pedestrian environment with “living street” designs, consistent landscaping, lighting, sidewalks, traffic calming measures, bikeways and trails, consistent with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Tree Ordinance and Design Guidelines.
 M-2.54. Beneficial Commercial Uses on Public Sidewalks. We may approve 1184
Ordinance No. 1804 Page 4
certain commercial uses on public sidewalks in the Pedestrian Overlay District when those uses benefit the overall pedestrian environment.

The proposed amendment would update a regulatory document, the Municipal Code, to implement updates to a temporary program for outdoor dining that improves the street scene and environment, supports local businesses, and “creates community gathering places”, strengthening the community character as referenced in LU-11.03.

B. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare, in that they further the General Plan objectives of meeting community values, needs, and conditions.

SECTION 4: Municipal Code Title 17 Zoning Amendment.

SCMC section 17.28.206 shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto, reflecting a new program termination date of January 1, 2029, consistent with Assembly Bill 592, and incorporating by reference new Parklet Design Standards as contained in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto.

SECTION 5: Severability.

If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any entity, person or circumstance is held for any reason to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6: Effective Date.

This Ordinance takes effect within 30 days after adoption of this Ordinance by the City Council.

SECTION 7: Reference to Existing Provisions.

All existing provisions of the Municipal Code that are repeated herein are repeated only to aid decision-makers and the public in understanding the effect of the proposed changes. Restatement of existing provisions does not constitute a new enactment.

SECTION 8: Custodian of Records.
1185
Ordinance No. 1804 Page 5
The documents and materials associated with this ordinance that constitute the record of proceedings on which the City Council’s findings and determinations are based are located at San Clemente City Hall, 100 Avenida Presidio, San Clemente, CA 92672.

SECTION 9: Certification and Publication.

The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause the same to be published as required by law.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _____day of _________________, ________.

ATTEST:
_______________________________ ___________________________ City Clerk of the City of Rick Loeffler, Mayor of the City of San Clemente, California San Clemente, California
1186
Ordinance No. 1804 Page 6

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1804 having been regularly introduced at the meeting of _______________________, was again introduced, the reading in full thereof unanimously waived, and duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _____day of _____________, _______, and said ordinance was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of ______________________, ________.
__________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, CITY ATTORNEY
1187
Exhibit A
Created: 2026-03-10 10:40:08 [EST]
(Supp. No. 65, Update 2)

Page 1 of 4 ends

Section 17.28.206 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

17.28.206 Temporary Parklet Program.

A. Purpose and Intent. The temporary parklet program regulations and design standards are established under State enabling legislation (AB 1217 and AB 592), which allow local agencies to adopt a program to support local business recovery from the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic by providing relief from parking restrictions to accommodate outdoor dining.

B. This Section models the State's intent to allow for a streamlined process to expand temporary outdoor dining areas. This program is temporary, with a termination date of January 1, 2029. Requests for Permanent Outdoor Dining areas on either private or public property should refer to SCMC 17.28.205 - Outdoor Dining Areas.

C. Applicability. This section shall apply to temporary outdoor facilities that are accessory to a food or beverage business licensed in the City of San Clemente. The facilities may be established:
a. On the public right-of-way on streets with a speed limit of 25 mph or less; or b. On private property.
c. Additionally, a business may apply for use of sidewalk space where the public path of travel is greater than ten feet in width under the exception process outlined in subsection D(vii).

D. Review Requirements. Requests for Parklet Dining Permits that comply with this title and the approved Parklet Design Standards will be approved ministerially. a. General standards: These regulations apply to all temporary outdoor food and beverage spaces, both on public and private property:
i. Hours of operation.

1. Alcohol, food, or beverages shall not be served or allowed within the outdoor dining area:
a. Before 7:00 a.m. and after 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday; and b. Before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. Friday through Saturday and the day prior to a City Holiday.

2. Outdoor Dining Areas shall comply with all State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control license requirements, as applicable.
ii. Use of space.

1. Smoking or vaping shall not be permitted within the outdoor dining areas.

2. Outdoor cooking and food preparation within the outdoor dining area is prohibited.

3. Live entertainment, including but not limited to live music and performances, is not permitted within the outdoor dining area and must be requested separately via a Special Events Permit or Temporary Use Permit.
iii. Public Access.

1. A path of travel not less than five feet in width must exist adjacent to any outdoor dining area. Parklets shall not encroach into or interfere with the use of adjoining sidewalk. 1188
Exhibit A
Created: 2026-03-10 10:40:08 [EST]
(Supp. No. 65, Update 2)

Page 2 of 4 ends

Disclaimer: It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to provide outdoor dining in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Nothing contained in these guidelines shall replace or diminish any ADA requirement.
iv. Fire Safety.

Disclaimer: It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to provide outdoor dining in full compliance with the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). The requirements listed were developed as part of the overall parklet standards in order to assist restaurant operators with meeting these compliance requirements. Nothing contained in these guidelines shall replace or diminish any OCFA requirement.
v. Department of Alcoholic Beverages.

1. The business owner is responsible for obtaining any required approvals from the CA ABC, such as a Temporary Catering Authorization.
vi. Pollution Prevention.

1. Outdoor eating and drinking venues must adhere to water pollution prevention practices to prevent trash, debris, food residue and other wastes from entering the storm drain system per SCMC 13.040.

Disclaimer: It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to clean the permitted area and follow the appropriate best management practices (BMPs). vii. Exceptions: Exceptions to the standards listed herein shall require a review by the Design Review Subcommittee and a Public Hearing with the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall make a final determination, appealable to the City Council per the City's standard Appeals process (See 17.12.140 - Appeals of an Action).
b. Parklets in the Street (Public Right-of-Way):
i. Allowed Locations: Parklets may only be located directly in front of eating and drinking establishments at the following locations:

1. Within the curb lane on streets where on-street metered or unmetered parking spaces exist adjacent to the front of the eating and drinking establishment; and

2. Behind the buffer zone as indicated within the Parklet Design Standards. Each business is responsible for its own costs associated with procurement and installation of the buffer zone and parklet materials.

3. Parklets may occupy up to a portion of three angle-in parking spaces where the parklet dining deck area shall be no wider than 2 spaces, or up to two parallel parking spaces. No more than five consecutive spaces may be used for outdoor dining operations on Avenida Del Mar, or more than four consecutive spaces on streets with parallel parking, when two parklets are immediately adjacent to each other.

4. Unless adjacently placed, as specified in Subsection D.b.3, parklets shall be required to provide a minimum distance from any other parklet of at least three parking spaces when located on Avenida Del Mar, or one parking space when located on streets with parallel parking.
ii. Prohibited locations: Parklets may not be located or placed at any of the following locations:

1. Along a street segment with a speed limit greater than 25 miles per hour. 1189
Exhibit A
Created: 2026-03-10 10:40:08 [EST]
(Supp. No. 65, Update 2)

Page 3 of 4 ends

2. Within ten feet away from any intersection, street corner, alley, or driveway. The Public Works Department may increase or decrease this distance based on a site-specific review of line-of-sight conditions; and

3. Within an existing bike lane or within a proposed bike lane project identified in any of the City's comprehensive bicycle plan(s) or adopted land use plan(s).

4. Within five feet of storm drain inlets or cleanouts.

5. Over utility access panels, manhole covers, handholes, transformers, water meters, or water valves.

6. Within five feet of a fire hydrant and/or any related emergency equipment.

7. Within five feet of any natural gas or electric utility facility, including but not limited to any manholes, handholes or vaults, and any surface-level structures such as natural gas meters, monitors, pressure regulators, protection stations, poles, curbside electric meters, transformers, or green utility boxes.
iii. Limitations:

1. Parklets may occupy an on-street ADA parking space that is adjacent to the business's frontage; however, this request requires an applicant undergo the additional exceptions process, requiring review by the Planning Commission, with input from the Public Works Director. The applicant shall be responsible for any costs associated with relocating accessible parking space, which shall be within 150 feet from the original space.

2. A maximum of 10 parklets (which allow for utilization of up to 30 parking spaces, but may be less) may be established on Avenida Del Mar. The total number of parklets on public property, including the 10-parklet limitation on Avenida Del Mar, shall not exceed 15.

3. Parklets are limited to 24 seats per business.
iv. Design Requirements for Parklets on public streets: Businesses shall comply with the requirements in the City’s Parklet Design Standards.
c. Parklets on Private Property:
i. Allowed Locations: Parklets may be permitted in any Zone as an accessory use of any food or beverage business with an active San Clemente Business License, subject to the following:

1. Private Parklets may be established on private property in areas that do not obstruct required paths of travel and do not remove more than two parking spaces.

2. The locations on private property shall be within parking stalls, unless approved otherwise by the City Planner and Public Works Director. Private property parklets are subject to the prohibited locations enforced for public property parklets.

3. Design Requirements for Parklets on private property shall be subject to the review standards required for angle-in parklets as described in the City’s Parklet Design Standards. d. Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement Requirements:
i. Prior to installation of any furniture or improvements and prior to operation of a parklet, an applicant shall obtain a Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement. a. Requests for approval of Limited Term Parking Relief Agreements that comply with the standards set forth in 17.28.206 and the City's Parklet Design Standards shall be reviewed administratively and approved by the City Manager or his or her designee. 1190
Exhibit A
Created: 2026-03-10 10:40:08 [EST]
(Supp. No. 65, Update 2)

Page 4 of 4 ends

b. Agreements shall specify a fee, as set by the City Council, for the use of and operation of the parklet. As of July 1, 2026, the fee established by the City Council is $4 per square foot of deck area for parklets in the public right of way and $1 per square foot of deck area for parklets on private property.
c. Agreements shall require Insurance coverage, including Commercial General Liability, personal injury, and property damage liability, with minimum combined liability limits of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence.
ii. Additional standards for parklets in the street / public right-of-way:
a. Prior to installation of any furniture or improvements, a Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement must be executed between the City and the applicant.
b. Parklets shall follow standard dimensions and plans as indicated within the Parklet Design Standards. Deviations from the standard approved construction templates shall require review by the Design Review Subcommittee.
c. Limited Term Parking Relief Agreements may indicate certain dates or events during which the restaurant shall agree to public or non-profit use of the parklet space.
iii. Parklets shall be removed/relocated at the permitee/business operator's expense within 30 days of notice that the City requires use of the right of way for a public project or event, which may occur at the City’s sole discretion.

Parklets shall be permanently removed at the permitee/business operator's expense within 7 days of the end of the Temporary Parklet Program authorization, which expires January 1, 2029.
(Ord. No. 1727, § 4, 2022; Ord. No. 1772, § 4(Exh. A), 2-6-2024) Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 1594, § 3(Exh. A, § 29), adopted May 5, 2015 repealed § 17.28.206, which pertained to Outdoor dining areas on public property, permanent and accessory and derived from Ord. 1308 § 11, adopted in 2006; Ord. 1182 § 11, adopted in 1997; and Ord. No. 1561, § 3(Exh. A, §§ 14—16), adopted Nov. 27 2012.
1191
1 Design
Standards
for Parklets
City of San Clemente
July 1, 2026 -
January 1, 2029
Exhibit B
1192
Parklet Standards
2 Standard Parklet Site Plans
The standard plans for angle-in and parallel parking configurations are attached as the final pages of these standards. All parklets are required to build their space to the specifications of these designs. Any deviations from these standards will require design review from the Design Review Subcommittee (DRSC) and the decision authority resides with the Planning Commission.

Dimensions
Angle-In Parking Spaces (i.e., Avenida Del Mar)
• Parklets shall occupy a maximum of a portion of 3 angle-in parking spaces. See Site Plan for specifications. • The parklet dining deck area shall be no wider than 2 parking spaces. Dimensions of the parklet and parking spaces shall be called out on the plans. The residual area of the occupied parking spaces shall be dedicated to e-bike or golf cart parking.
• The outdoor dining deck shall be directly in front of the business associated with the Parklet and shall not obstruct the frontage of another business.
• Parklets shall not encroach into and interfere with use of adjoining sidewalk. • All parklets shall be designed to allow egress from vehicles that park in adjacent stalls. This is at least 2-feet in all areas except for the rear corners adjacent to the sidewalk. See Site Plan for specifications. • The business is responsible for maintaining a 3-foot “buffer zone” between the street and the dining deck for planters that are to provide traffic protection.
• There shall be a minimum of 3 inches of clear space below and around the dining deck. To accommodate parklet cleaning, there shall be a baseboard that is removeable or a baseboard that incorporates a hidden hinge. • The deck surface may be a maximum of 12 inches above the ground. If necessary, decks may be stepped to follow the slope of the street to maintain this height limit.
1193
Parallel Parking Spaces (i.e., Avenida Victoria)
• Parklets shall occupy a maximum of 2 parking spaces. The parklets shall be squared-off on both sides. Dimensions of the parklet and parking spaces shall be called out on the plans. See Site Plan for specifications. • The outdoor dining deck shall be directly in front of the business associated with the Parklet and shall not obstruct the frontage of another business.
• Parklets shall not encroach into and interfere with use of adjoining sidewalk. • All parklets shall be designed to allow egress from vehicles that park in adjacent stalls. This is at least 2-feet in all areas except for the rear corners adjacent to the sidewalk. See Site Plan for specifications. • The business is responsible for maintaining a 3-foot “buffer zone” between the street and the dining deck for planters that are to provide traffic protection.
• There shall be a minimum of 3 inches of clear space below the dining deck. To accommodate parklet cleaning, there shall be a baseboard that is removeable or a baseboard that incorporates a hidden hinge. • The deck surface may be a maximum of 12 inches above the ground. If necessary, decks may be stepped to follow the slope of the street to maintain this height limit.

Parklets on Private Property
Parklets may be established on private property throughout the City in areas that do not obstruct required paths of travel and do not remove more than 2 parking spaces. Parklets on private property shall be subject to the design and standards required for parklets along Avenida Del Mar.
1194
Buffer Zone
Each Parklet is required to provide a three (3) foot
buffer zone between the public street and the Parklet.

The 3-foot buffer zone shall be occupied by concrete
planters as specified in the Limited Term Parking
Relief Agreement. Planters must be spaced a minimum
of 5 ft. on center, or a minimum of 4 for each Parklet.

Plants shall be California Native and drought tolerant or succulents, where they must be kept in a healthy
condition and are the responsibility of the business
owner. These plants shall, when considered fully
grown, be no taller than 18-inches above the planter.

See Plant Palette for additional information.

Examples of Plants
Figure 1: Example of planter
1195
Parklet Design & Aesthetics
Design Goal
The City desires to establish a complimentary parklet design that creates a cohesive street scene. The street-facing portions will require a consistent design that provides a clear delineation from traffic. The decks on Del Mar and other public areas will be built to the standard configuration referenced in this document.

Design, Materials, and Accessories
The following design standards were prepared in cooperation with the San Clemente Design Review Subcommittee (DRSC).

These standards are to improve the design and aesthetics of parklets which intend to:
 Reduce visual clutter.
 Create a standardized street interface.
 Improve safety and visibility.
 Create a standardized parklet design.
 Encourage low maintenance furniture, plants, and accessories.  Encourage dark sky friendly illumination.
5 1196
Approved Barrier Materials
The 3-side perimeter barrier shall be constructed with Cedar or Douglas Fir with horizontal metal cable, see Figure 2. The height of the barrier shall be 36-inches. Spacing shall be 4-inches between non-structural portions of the barrier, including cables, so that police and visitors may maintain visibility into the areas behind the parklets.

Furniture
Outdoor dining areas should use simple patio
furniture designs of high-quality materials. All
furniture shall utilize a natural color palette consisting of either dark brown or black. Plastic or vinyl furniture is prohibited.
6 Figure 2: Example
of Perimeter
Barriers with Hex
Color Code
Figure 3: Example
of Furniture
#6A5143
1197
Figure 4: Example of
Solar perimeter lighting
and lighting within an
umbrella .
7 Lighting
Lighting shall be down-ward facing and placed along barrier fencing or incorporated into umbrellas. Lights and fixtures must be concealed from public right-of-way view by barrier railings and umbrellas. Overhead lighting is not permitted. All lighting shall be white with a temperature rating of 3500k (warm white). Lighting shall be set on a timer, or manually controlled, to shut off after business hours. Parklets shall use solar or battery powered lighting. Cords across the public sidewalk are prohibited.

Bike Rack
Parklet operators shall incorporate a bike rack made of black powder-coated tubular steel or wrought iron within the
residual parking space area. See Site Plan for specific location.

Figure 5: Examples of Bike Racks
1198
Figure 6: Sample market umbrella
with Hex color code and heaters.

Shade and heat
Each parklet may use a maximum of two umbrellas up to 7 ft. in height when measured from the top of the deck. The combined canopy coverage shall not exceed 90 square feet. Umbrellas shall be dark green, see Figure 6. Each parklet may use a maximum of two low-height (under 5 ft.) heaters. Propane shall be kept within the internal boundaries of the parklet, and not visible from the street or sidewalk.
8 Prohibited Elements
 Pop-up tents
 Overhead elements
 Lattice (wood or plastic)
 Plastic or vinyl fences, trellises, or furniture
 Excessive decoration
 Elevated string lighting
 Tall walls, plants or other accessories over 5-feet in height  Banner signs
 Any other items exceeding the height of the barrier railing  Storage of any items not in current use as part of the approved parklet operations.
#2A4E43
1199
Standard Parklet Site Plans
1200

APPROVALS ARE TEMPORARY
10 The City of San Clemente reserves the right to remove parklets and clear the right-of-way at its sole discretion. Please contact the City at [email protected] for approval of your parklet. Once a parklet following the above standards is approved and construction is completed, contact the Planning Division to schedule a final inspection. At the conclusion of this program, parklets must be removed, and the parking and sidewalk areas must be restored to their original condition. If you have questions or need additional guidance, please send an email to [email protected]. 1201
Attachment 2
Subject Area: Temporary Parklet Program

INTRODUCTION
These proposed zoning changes clarify the Temporary Parklet Program design standards and extend the termination period to January 1, 2029 to align with state enabling legislation (AB 592).

Due to inconsistencies in the application of design standards, parklets are built at different dimensions, design styles, and accommodations which contribute to visibility and aesthetic compatibility issues. In an effort to alleviate discrepancies across the various types of parklets, there should be standardized parklet design standards, adjusted fees, and a reduction to the size of the program to address negative impacts as a result of the Temporary Parklet Program. “REDLINE” VERSION OF PROPOSED CHANGES

17.28.206 Temporary Parklet Program.

A. Purpose and Intent. The temporary parklet program regulations and design standards are established under State enabling legislation (AB 1217 and AB 592), which allow local agencies to adopt a program to support local business recovery from the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic by providing relief from parking restrictions to accommodate outdoor dining.

B. This Section models the State's intent to allow for a streamlined process to expand temporary outdoor dining areas. This program is temporary, with a termination date of January 1, 2029. Requests for Permanent Outdoor Dining areas on either private or public property should refer to SCMC 17.28.205 - Outdoor Dining Areas.

C. Applicability. This section shall apply to temporary outdoor facilities that are accessory to a food or beverage business licensed in the City of San Clemente. The facilities may be established:
a. On the public right-of-way on streets with a speed limit of 25 mph or less; or b. On private property.
c. Additionally, a business may apply for use of sidewalk space where the public path of travel is greater than ten feet in width under the exception process outlined in subsection D(vii).

D. Review Requirements. Requests for Parklet Dining Permits that comply with this title and the approved Parklet Design Standards will be approved ministerially. a. General standards: These regulations apply to all temporary outdoor food and beverage spaces, both on public and private property:
i. Hours of operation.

1. Alcohol, food, or beverages shall not be served or allowed within the outdoor dining area:
a. Before 7:00 a.m. and after 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday; and b. Before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. Friday through Saturday and the day prior to a City Holiday.

2. Outdoor Dining Areas shall comply with all State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control license requirements, as applicable.
ii. Use of space.

1. Smoking or vaping shall not be permitted within the outdoor dining areas.

2. Outdoor cooking and food preparation within the outdoor dining area is prohibited. 1202
Created: 2026-03-10 10:40:08 [EST]
(Supp. No. 65, Update 2)

Page 2 of 4 ends

3. Live entertainment, including but not limited to live music and performances, is not permitted within the outdoor dining area and must be requested separately via a Special Events Permit or Temporary Use Permit.
iii. Public Access.

1. A path of travel not less than five feet in width must exist adjacent to any outdoor dining area. Parklets shall not encroach into or interfere with the use of adjoining sidewalk.

Disclaimer: It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to provide outdoor dining in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Nothing contained in these guidelines shall replace or diminish any ADA requirement.
iv. Fire Safety
Disclaimer: It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to provide outdoor dining in full compliance with the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). The requirements listed were developed as part of the overall parklet standards in order to assist restaurant operators with meeting these compliance requirements. Nothing contained in these guidelines shall replace or diminish any OCFA requirement.
v. Department of Alcoholic Beverages

1. The business owner is responsible for obtaining any required approvals from the CA ABC, such as a Temporary Catering Authorization.
vi. Pollution Prevention

1. Outdoor eating and drinking venues must adhere to water pollution prevention practices to prevent trash, debris, food residue and other wastes from entering the storm drain system per SCMC 13.040.

Disclaimer: It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to clean the permitted area and follow the appropriate best management practices (BMPs). vii. Exceptions: Exceptions to the standards listed herein shall require a review by the Design Review Subcommittee and a Public Hearing with the Planning Commission. . The Planning Commission shall make a final determination, appealable to the City Council per the City's standard Appeals process (See 17.12.140 - Appeals of an Action).
b. Parklets in the Street (Public Right-of-Way):
i. Allowed Locations: Parklets may only be located directly in front of eating and drinking establishments at the following locations:

1. Within the curb lane on streets where on-street metered or unmetered parking spaces exist adjacent to the front of the eating and drinking establishment; and

2. Behind the buffer zone as indicated within the Parklet Design Standards. Each business is responsible for its own costs associated with procurement and installation of the buffer zone and parklet materials.

3. Parklets may occupy up to a portion of three angle-in parking spaces where the parklet dining deck area shall be no wider than 2 spaces, or up to two parallel parking spaces. No more than five consecutive spaces may be used for outdoor dining operations on Avenida Del Mar, or more than four consecutive spaces on streets with parallel parking, when two parklets are immediately adjacent to each other.
1203
Created: 2026-03-10 10:40:08 [EST]
(Supp. No. 65, Update 2)

Page 3 of 4 ends

4. Unless adjacently placed, as specified in Subsection D.b.3, parklets shall be required to provide a minimum distance from any other parklet of at least three parking spaces when located on Avenida Del Mar, or one parking space when located on streets with parallel parking.
ii. Prohibited locations: Parklets may not be located or placed at any of the following locations:

1. Along a street segment with a speed limit greater than 25 miles per hour.

2. Within ten feet away from any intersection, street corner, alley, or driveway. The Public Works Department may increase or decrease this distance based on a site-specific review of line-of-sight conditions; and

3. Within an existing bike lane or within a proposed bike lane project identified in any of the City's comprehensive bicycle plan(s) or adopted land use plan(s).

4. Within five feet of storm drain inlets or cleanouts.

5. Over utility access panels, manhole covers, handholes, transformers, water meters, or water valves.

6. Within five feet of a fire hydrant and/or any related emergency equipment.

7. Within five feet of any natural gas or electric utility facility, including but not limited to any manholes, handholes or vaults, and any surface-level structures such as natural gas meters, monitors, pressure regulators, protection stations, poles, curbside electric meters, transformers, or green utility boxes.
iii. Limitations:

1. Parklets may occupy an on-street ADA parking space that is adjacent to the business's frontage; however, this request requires an applicant undergo the additional exceptions process, requiring review by the Planning Commission, with input from the Public Works Director. The applicant shall be responsible for any costs associated with relocating accessible parking space, which shall be within 150 feet from the original space.

2. A maximum of 10 parklets (30 parking spaces) may be established on Avenida Del Mar.

The total number of parklets on public property shall not exceed 15.

3. Parklets are limited to 24 seats per business.
iv. Design Requirements for Parklets on public streets: Businesses shall comply with the requirements in the City’s Parklet Design Standards.
c. Parklets on Private Property:
i. Allowed Locations: Parklets may be permitted in any Zone as an accessory use of any food or beverage business with an active San Clemente Business License.

1. Private Parklets may be established on private property in areas that do not obstruct required paths of travel and do not remove more than two parking spaces.

2. The locations on private property should be within parking stalls, unless approved otherwise by the City Planner and Public Works Director. Private property parklets are subject to the prohibited locations enforced for public property parklets. 1204
Created: 2026-03-10 10:40:08 [EST]
(Supp. No. 65, Update 2)

Page 4 of 4 ends

iii. Design Requirements for Parklets on private property shall be subject to the review standards required for angle-in parklets as described in the City’s Parklet Design Standards.
d. Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement Requirements:
i. Prior to installation of any furniture or improvements and prior to operation of a parklet, an applicant shall obtain a Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement. a. Requests for approval of Limited Term Parking Relief Agreements that comply with the standards set forth in 17.28.206 and the City's Parklet Design Standards shall be reviewed administratively and approved by the City Manager or his or her designee. b. Agreements shall specify a fee, as set by the City Council, for the use of and operation of the parklet. As of July 1, 2026, the fee established by the City Council is $4 per square foot of deck area for parklets in the public right of way and $1 per square foot of deck area for parklets on private property.
c. Agreements shall require Insurance coverage, including Commercial General Liability, personal injury, and property damage liability, with minimum combined liability limits of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence.
ii. Additional standards for parklets in the street / public right-of-way:
a. Prior to installation of any furniture or improvements, a Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement must be executed between the City and the applicant.
b. Parklets shall follow standard dimensions and plans as indicated within the Parklet Design Standards. Deviations from the standard approved construction templates shall require review by the Design Review Subcommittee.
c. Limited Term Parking Relief Agreements may indicate certain dates or events during which the restaurant shall agree to public or non-profit use of the parklet space.
iii. Parklets shall be removed/relocated at the permitee/business operator's expense within 30 days of notice that the City requires use of the right of way for a public project or event, which may occur at the City’s sole discretion.

Parklets shall be permanently removed at the permitee/business operator's expense within 7 days of the end of the Temporary Parklet Program authorization, which expires January 1, 2029..
(Ord. No. 1727, § 4, 2022; Ord. No. 1772, § 4(Exh. A), 2-6-2024) Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 1594, § 3(Exh. A, § 29), adopted May 5, 2015 repealed § 17.28.206, which pertained to Outdoor dining areas on public property, permanent and accessory and derived from Ord. 1308 § 11, adopted in 2006; Ord. 1182 § 11, adopted in 1997; and Ord. No. 1561, § 3(Exh. A, §§ 14—16), adopted Nov. 27 2012.
1205
1 GUIDELINES
for Temporary
Outdoor Dining
Parklets
City of San Clemente
2022-2023
Attachment 3
1206
2 Eligibility (see also SCMC 17.28.206)
Parklets may be established:
 On sidewalks where the public path of travel is greater than 10’ in width. In these cases, the parklet may occupy 40% of the width of the sidewalk.
 Within designated parking parking spaces on streets where the posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour or slower.  On private property in areas that do not obstruct required paths of travel and do not remove more than 5 parking spaces or 50% of parking attributed to the business (whichever is less).  Near/adjacent to the business’s frontage (at the discretion of City Staff).

Limitations on Parklets:
 A maximum of 42 parking spaces may be used on Avenida Del Mar. This equates to 29% of the on-street parking stock (143 spaces) for Avenida Del Mar, but only 4% of the downtown public parking stock (1014 spaces)  Parklets may have a maximum of 24 seats for dining + a bench for customers waiting to be seated  No more than 6 consecutive parking spaces may be occupied on Ave. Del Mar  Businesses may submit joint applications for shared spaces – great for breakfast and dinner neighbors!  Parklets must be located at least ten (10) feet away from any intersection or street corner  Parklets may not obstruct Class 1 or 2 bike lanes
 Parklets may not be within five (5) feet of storm drain inlets or cleanouts.

Participating businesses are required to enter into a Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement with the City which incorporates a monthly fee of $4 per square foot of dining area on public property and $1 per square foot of dining area on private property, as established by the City Council. Collected funds will be used by the City to augment the Trolley operations and other programs that support mobility improvements within the City. 1207
3 Parklet Specifications
Design Goal
The City desires to find a balance between a cohesive street scene while also allowing room for individual business character in parklets. The street-facing portions will require a consistent design that provides a clear delineation from traffic. The decks on Del Mar and other public areas will be built to a standard configuration, but may incorporate different colors, plants, or other features to distinguish the different operators of those spaces.

Standard Parklet Plans
SMP Environmental Design, the City’s consulting landscape architect, prepared standard plans for parklets in angle-in and parallel parking configurations. The standard plans are attached as the final pages of these guidelines. Parklets on public streets, including Ave. Del Mar, are required to build their space to the specifications of one of these alternatives.

Dimensions
Avenida Del Mar has an 80’ right of way (ROW), which includes the street (54’) and adjacent sidewalk areas (~8’/ea), which include curbs, driveway aprons, and parkway tree planters. Outdoor dining on Del Mar may not use sidewalk areas. The parklets may be established on-street and occupy 14’ of space out from the curb in areas where “angle-in” parking fronts the business. Beyond the 14’ deck, the business is also responsible for constructing the standard 4-foot “buffer zone” which includes plants and traffic rated protection for the dining areas. Parklets may occupy 3 angle-in parking spaces per business along Avenida Del Mar.
1208
4 Businesses with frontage along parallel parking space areas may only occupy 2 parking spaces, approximately 40 lineal feet.

They must also provide the 4’ buffer zone, which leaves approximately 5-feet for a parklet deck. All parklets must be constructed a minimum of 2-feet off center of parking stripes to allow for egress from vehicles that park in adjacent stalls.

Businesses fronting Avenida Victoria in the Pier Bowl may be granted more than 2 parallel parking spaces (or equivalent) with City approval.

Buffer Zone
The 4-foot buffer zone is intended to have a consistent appearance and set a regular edge and rhythm. This area will be characterized by concrete planters, which should be set at 5’ intervals. The first planter should be set at the corner nearest adjacent oncoming traffic, with subsequent planters spaced approximately every 5-feet. A reflective strip or button should be placed at the top edge of each planter. For a parklet that uses 3 parking spaces, five (5) planters would be required.

SMP Environmental Design provided sample plants and shrubs that would be appropriate in parklet planters. These are detailed after the template plans at the end of this document. Plants must be kept in a healthy condition and are the responsibility of the business owner. The City will procure the planters (see Figure 1), which will be 30” diameter and height. The businesses will be responsible for $250/planter needed for their parklet as detailed in the Limited Term Parking Relief Agreement. The City will cover the rest of the cost and will assume ownership and responsibility of the planters after December 31, 2023.

Figure 1: Mex Cylinder Concrete Planter
1209
5 Configuration
Each parklet must be surrounded on the three street-adjacent sides with a barrier to establish the boundaries of the parklet.

The barrier on the traffic side should not allow pedestrians to pass through directly into traffic. The interface with the public sidewalk should be flush so that the dining area is accessible.

Curbs & Storm Flow
Large volumes of water may flow down some streets during rain events. These guidelines require businesses to maintain drainage along the street and gutter lines at all times. Parklets cannot obstruct public utilities or interfere with drainage or storm drains. All parklets must be designed and built outside of the gutter lines in order to accommodate storm flows. If a parklet is constructed on a platform, the platform must be entirely above the gutter. Street deck/platforms should have a 5”x 18” minimum opening for curb drainage, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. Business owners are fully responsible for assuring that their existing platforms and other outdoor features are constructed and maintained in a manner that allows the free flow of water and does not result in flooding.

ADA Spaces
A business may request to use an ADA parking stall as part of their parklet area but is responsible for any fees as determined by Public Works and/or Maintenance related to creation of a replacement temporary ADA stall at an alternate location within 150 feet. The neighboring businesses (within 150’ feet) should consent to the ADA space relocation; this consent will be considered by the Public Works Director in determining whether to allow the relocation.

Parklets on Private Property
Parklets may be established on private property throughout the City in areas that do not obstruct required paths of travel and do not remove more than 3 parking spaces that are attributed to the business’s use. Parklets on private property are 1210
6 encouraged to construct wooden decks, but are not required to do so. They need to use a forty-two (42) inch high railing to serve as a barrier from vehicular traffic within parking lots. These permiter barriers must be of wooden construction. Private parklets are encouraged to use market umbrellas for shade, but may use a single large tent (if approved by OCFA). They may not use 10-foot square pop up tents. Parklets may not be sited on ADA parking spaces, within 5 feet of any fire hydrant, natural gas, or electric utility equipment.

Parklet Design & Aesthetics
Design, Materials, and Accessories
The following design guidelines were prepared in cooperation with the San Clemente Design Review Subcommittee (DRSC).

These guidelines are intended to improve the design and aesthetics of parklets and are intended to:
 Reduce visual clutter
 Create a standardized street interface
 Improve safety and visibility
 Provide for some flexibility and individualization amongst the different businesses  Encourage low maintenance furniture, plants, and accessories  Encourage dark sky friendly illumination
Deck Surfaces
Parklets on the public street require platform/deck construction in order to be raised to the height of the adjacent sidewalk.

Decks must be constructed of wood. Decks should leave leave 5” by 18” clear adjacent to the curb to allow for storm water flow. (Parklets on private property are encouraged, but not required, to construct decks.) 1211
7 Approved Barrier Materials
The 3-side perimeter barrier should be constructed with wood, polywood, or dark iron pickets. Wood with cable is permitted for parklet enclosures on private property. Integration of natural concrete or terracotta planters is also permitted. Barrier should be only semi-private (no solid surfaces) so that police services may maintain visibility into the areas. These barrier types apply to parklets on both public and private property.

Furniture
Outdoor dining areas should use simple patio furniture designs. Plastic or vinyl furniture is discouraged. This applies to parklets on both public and private property.

Lighting
Where lighting is used, it should be placed at a low level - in plantings or along barrier fencing.

Lighting Overhead lighting is discouraged. All lighting should be white with a temperature rating of 3500k (warm white). Lighting should
be set on a timer or unplugged after
business hours. It should be shielded
and directed downward. Parklets on
public property should use solar lighting.

Cords across the public sidewalk will not
be supported, and drawing from public
power sources will not be available.

Figure 3: Sample perimeter lighting at Rancho Capistrano Winery Figure 2: Example of Solar Lights for posts
1212
8 Shade and heat
Only round market umbrellas may be used for shade. Each parklet may use a maximum of three umbrellas. 8-9’ umbrella sizes are recommended. Low height (under 5’) infrared heaters are strongly preferred. A maximum of two portable propane heaters over 6- feet tall are permitted on any parklet.

Encouraged vs. Discouraged Elements:

Encouraged Elements
 Natural wood with dark stains or paint
 Drought tolerant plants under 3-feet in height
 Solar powered lighting
 Business colors used in furniture (chairs, umbrellas, etc)  Menu sign affixed to barrier at sidewalk edge, not to exceed 2’x2’
 Edge lighting and downward angled lighting
Discouraged Elements
 Pop-up tents (except in limited circumstances on private property)
 Overhead elements
 Lattice (wood or plastic)
 Plastic or vinyl fences, trellises, or furniture
 Excessive decoration
 Elevated string lighting
 Tall walls, plants or other accessories over 5-feet in height  Banner signs
Figure 4: Market umbrellas and heaters
1213
9 Accessibility
It is the responsibility of each restaurant operator to provide outdoor dining in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the California Building Code Standards (CBC). The requirements listed below were developed as part of the overall Parklet guidelines in order to assist restaurant operators with meeting these compliance requirements. Nothing contained herein shall replace or diminish any of the requirements under the ADA or CBC.

For beverage and dining establishments, at least 5% of the seating spaces and 5% of the standing spaces shall be accessible.

All accessibility requirements are subject to inspection. Accessible spaces must meet the following requirements:
 Table surface between 28 to 34 inches high.
 At least 27 inches of space from the floor to
the bottom of the table.
 Knee clearance extends at least 19 inches
under the table.
 Total clear floor area of 30 inches by 48
inches per seat.
 Minimum distance of 4 feet to the nearest
obstruction.
 International Symbol of Accessibility
displayed at the table.
 Maintain an accessible path of travel to the
table.

Figure 5: Accessibility Standards
1214
10 Insurance Requirement for Dining Areas on Public Property The City requires Commercial General Liability, personal injury and property damage liability, with minimum combined liability limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. Any deductible or self-insured retention in excess of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) shall be declared to the City and requires the prior approval. An additional insured endorsement to the general liability policy is required and shall name and list the City of San Clemente, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insured. It is the responsibility of the business owner to maintain current insurance. Lapsed insurance may constitute grounds for termination of any parklet permit.

Orange County Fire Authority Requirements
• Exits and aisles leading to exits shall not be obstructed at any time. • Exits shall terminate to an approved Public Way.
• Fire department access, roadways and gates shall remain unobstructed at all times in order to allow emergency vehicles access for firefighting purposes.
• Temporary railings shall be adequately braced and anchored to withstand the elements of weather and/or collapse. • A currently tagged fire extinguisher (min. 2A 10BC ) shall be present within 75 feet of travel distance • All fire protection equipment shall be maintained in an operative condition. • Clearance around fire protection equipment shall be maintained. (Fire hydrants, Fire department connections, and Outside Stem & Yolk’s)
• Flaming food, drinks, and candles are prohibited.
• Individual or adjacent tents/canopies/E-Z Ups/membrane structures that are either: A) 400 sq.ft. with one or more sidewalls, or B) 700 sq.ft. without sidewalls must submit a Special Event Screening form. • Visit www.OCFA.org Business Prevention Field Services Special Events Permits. 1215
11 Pollution Prevention Requirements
• Outdoor eating and drinking venues must adhere to water pollution prevention practices to prevent trash, debris, food residue and other wastes from entering the storm drain system. The applicant is responsible for cleaning the permitted area. Clean-up activities must be in compliance with all pertinent City codes, including the Storm Water Runoff Control Ordinance, SCMC 13.040.
• When cleaning outdoor eating/drinking spaces follow these best management practices (BMPs):
o Do not hose down any outdoor eating/drinking area.
o Use dry cleanup methods, such as sweeping and hand removal, to clean up debris. o Have materials (absorbent pads, material, rags, mops, brooms, and/or dust pans) on-site to immediately clean-up spilled/edible materials such as beverages, ice cream or food. o Periodically clean all outdoor eating/drinking areas of waste material during the operation. o Trash, debris, food residue and other wastes must be removed at the conclusion of each day. o Place and regularly service temporary waste and recycling receptacles near outdoor eating/drinking areas for patrons to conveniently dispose of/recycle waste material. This will help prevent the overflow of nearby City trash and recycling receptacles.
o Any water used for cleaning purposes must be collected and disposed of appropriately. o At no time shall waste or wastewater enter the City’s storm drain system, which includes gutters and storm drain catch basins.
o Train employees about pollution prevention best management practices (BMPs).

Department of Alcoholic Beverages Requirements
The business owner is responsible for obtaining any required approvals from the CA ABC, such as a Temporary Catering Auhorization.
1216
12 Approvals are Temporary
The City of San Clemente reserves the right to remove parklets and clear the right-of-way at its sole discretion. Please contact the City at [email protected] for pre-approval of your parklet design. Once a parklet following the above guidelines is approved and completed, submit photos from different angles to [email protected] with the business name and address in the subject line. At the conclusion of this program, parklets must be removed, and the parking and sidewalk areas must be restored to their original condition. If you have questions or need additional guidance, please send an email to [email protected].
1217

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE

DESIGN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
MARCH 25, 2026
Subcommittee Members Present: Chair M. Steven Camp, Vice Chair Cameron Cosgrove, and Member Scott McKhann
Subcommittee Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Andy Hall, City Manager
Adam Atamian, Community Development Director
Zach Rehm, Acting City Planner
Christopher Wright, Senior Planner
David Carrillo, Lead Project Planner
Jessica Gatny, Assistant Planner
Alexia Gruszczynski, Assistant Planner
Chair Camp called to order the Design Review Sub-Committee (DRSC) Regular Meeting for City of San Clemente on March 25, 2026.

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Receive and File Minutes from the March 11, 2026 Regular Meeting There being no changes to the March 11, 2026 Meeting of DRSC, the minutes were received and filed.

2. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:

A. Public Hearing Project (PHP) 22-427, Wood Residence, 104 W. Avenida Cadiz A request to consider an existing unpermitted 543 sq. ft. living room addition, an increase to the height of the existing garage roof, and changes to the front facade, including a new entry porch with steps, a new window, new garage door, and new exterior siding. The subject property is adjacent to a historic residence.

Assistant Planner Gatny summarized the staff report.

The DRSC discussed the project, and made the following comments either individually or as a group:
• Wrap the front siding around each corner, approximately 6’ along the west elevation & enough to fully encompass the window on the east elevation. • Consider a stucco finish for the chimney in lieu of the proposed brick. • Provide dimensions for the garage door on the floor plans.

The DRSC forwarded the project to the Planning Commission for consideration.

DRAFT
Attachment 4
1218
Design Review Subcommittee Regular Meeting Minutes March 25, 2026 Page 2 B. Public Hearing Project (PHP) 25-289, 111 La Ronda Townhome Subdivision A request to construct a 31-unit multi-family residential development on vacant land located at 111 La Ronda, under the City’s Lot Consolidation Program, and the State Density Bonus and Accessory Dwelling Unit Law.

Lead Project Planner Carrillo summarized the staff report.

The DRSC discussed the project, and made the following comments either individually or as a group:
• Each unit should have a well-defined main entrance and distinct building elevations to further reinforce individual identity through – the current design is box-like.
• Improve building height variation throughout the project. • Consider a cottage architectural style instead of a more generic style. • Improve the layering of landscaping to further improve unit identity. • Minimize the amount of roof eyebrows.
• Supports the use of a variety of materials.
• Consider how the landscaping interacts with site elements such as retaining walls and planters.

C. Public Hearing Project (PHP) 26-131, Parklet Design Standards A request to consider City Council recommended changes to the City’s Parklet Design Standards.

Assistant Planner Gruszczynski summarized the staff report and provided a presentation on updated Parklet Design Standards recommended by staff.

Acting City Planner Rehm discussed the potential process for the Parklet Design Standards to be implemented. The transition should be scheduled around a Public Works street resurfacing project on Avenida Del Mar, potentially the end of summer. Community Development Director Atamian provided additional context and suggested a few alternative times the new parklet standards could be introduced, pending the decision of City Council to continue the program or end it July 1.

There were public comments for this item, which are addressed below.

Chris Wood made the following comments:
• Expressed concerns about the size of the deck related to the tenant frontage.
• Blocking neighbors that are not restaurants, which creates visibility issues.

The parklets should remain contained within their frontage area. • Retailers are struggling due to the excess of outdoor dining areas. • Parking issues.

DRAFT
1219
Design Review Subcommittee Regular Meeting Minutes March 25, 2026 Page 3 • Encouraged consideration of restaurants with outdoor dining to not be granted additional outdoor dining space with the parklets. • Encouraged conversations with business owners.
• Unsupportive of proposed design and current design.

Kathy Ward made the following comments:
• Concerns about circulation and signage.
• Addressed the history of COVID and establishment of parklets and why it worked originally.
• The number of spaces allotted to parklets should be reduced. • Avenida Del Mar has a strict design guideline that should be adhered. • Parklets must be within designated parking spaces.
• Concerns with an excess of outdoor dining opportunities. • The parklet cap should be adjusted.
• Review of parklet designs should be taken to the Planning Commission. • Expressed concerns for enforcement on the parklets.

Wayne Eggleston made the following comments:
• Staff should take additional time on the design after an extension of the program.
• In favor of the parklets and would like to see changes that remove the “flea market” atmosphere.
• Should lower the parklets and reduce the size of them. • Prefers concrete planters instead of wood.
• No overhead lighting.
• No signs on the parklets.
• Reduce the number of accessory items that impede the vertical space of the parklet.
• Reduce the number of parking spaces granted to the parklet program.

Amanda Quintanilla made the following comments:
• Submitted complaint about Coastal Cowboy outdoor dining area within public right-of-way.
• Planters should be taken care of. Plants need to be kept in good condition. • Bike racks are unnecessary.
• No signs on the parklets.
• Concerned with a bar scene expanding on Avenida Del Mar. • Parking safety concerns.
• No heaters.
• Decrease the size of parklets.
• Discriminatory that parklets are only allowed for restaurants.

Sherman Fowler made the following comments:
• Lack of communication between business owners and the City, should offer a service that allows the City to communicate with the business owner. • Code Enforcement should enhance their citations.
• Concerned with parklets and the Olympics in 2028.

DRAFT
1220
Design Review Subcommittee Regular Meeting Minutes March 25, 2026 Page 4 Andy Hall made the following comments:
• COVID streamlined this process and it was never designed fully in the beginning.
• Staff is trying to augment this situation and working within changing State laws.
• Suggested the cable rails like the ones along the beach trail. • Suggested a design that is implemented into the sidewalk and does not provide a raised deck surface.
• Scale of the parklets may be too large for Avenida Del Mar. • Careful of doing something permanent that may lead to bigger problems down the line.

Greg Ward made the following comments:
• Parklets were never designed to be cleaned underneath. Rats and cockroaches are residing in the area under the parklet. • Consider washing the deck surface by providing a deck surface that would allow for that.
• Parklets have 3 ½ spaces, which is really 4 spaces, and not just 3 spaces.

The DRSC discussed the project, and made the following comments either individually or as a group:
• Possibility for each parklet to be reviewed by DRSC.
• Create a consistent parklet design that compliments the downtown areas. • Parking issues could be assisted if restriping to perpendicular parking stalls were considered on Avenida Del Mar.
• Suggestions for enhancement in enforcement standards to mitigate issues with nonconforming parklets.
• Create a cohesive roadmap for the parklet operators when required to remove the parklets and rebuild them to the new Parklet Design Standards. • Consider the location of temporary kiosks.
• Consider a Master Plan for Avenida Del Mar and how parklets and other features are addressed (i.e., restaurants, parking, retail, parklets, kiosks). • Consider a single post or cantilevered umbrellas which should be natural in color.
• Lights could be solar and under the railing.
• Natural colors should be used for the parklets, where the materials should match exactly to the standards provided.
• Signs should incorporate a Spanish design.
• Bike racks should be included but not golf cart parking. • Consider the parking requirements and standards that are affected by the Parklet Program. This can be initiated with parking enforcement. • Clip the corners of the parklet to reduce the overall size.

DRAFT
1221
Design Review Subcommittee Regular Meeting Minutes March 25, 2026 Page 5 • The parklet barrier should be transparent to allow visibility through the parklet and towards the neighboring businesses. The material should be wood with cable.
• Consider a full discussion by the Planning Commission to provide the City Council with a comprehensive overview of the program.

3. NEW BUSINESS
None

4. OLD BUSINESS
None

5. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
None

6. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved to adjourn the meeting to an Adjourned Design Review Subcommittee meeting on April 1, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., San Clemente City Hall, First Floor Community Room, 910 Calle Negocio, San Clemente, CA.

Respectfully submitted,
_______________________________
M. Steven Camp, Chair
Attest:
_______________________________
Christopher Wright, Senior Planner
DRAFT
1222

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE

DESIGN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
APRIL 1, 2026
Subcommittee Members Present: Chair M. Steven Camp, and Vice Chair Cameron Cosgrove
Subcommittee Members Absent: Member Scott McKhann
Staff Present: Adam Atamian, Community Development Director Zach Rehm, Acting City Planner
Alexia Gruszczynski, Assistant Planner
Chair Camp called to order the Design Review Sub-Committee (DRSC) meeting for the City of San Clemente on April 1, 2026.

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.

2. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:

A. Public Hearing Project (PHP) 26-131, Parklet Design Standards A request to consider City Council recommended changes to the City’s Parklet Design Standards.

Action: Chair Camp made a motion to adjust the previously noticed 5-minute public comment time to 3-minutes per speaker after the staff presentation, and an additional 1-minute per speaker after DRSC discussion. Vice Chair Cosgrove seconded the motion and the motion carried 2-0, Member McKhann absent.

Assistant Planner Gruszczynski summarized the staff report and provided a presentation and provided a presentation on updated Parklet Design Standards recommended by staff.

Chair Camp asked clarifying questions on the types of plants and their height, the total height of the parklets, the gap underneath the parklets, color, height, and types of umbrellas, furniture options, thickness of metal cable, wood for deck, and sizes for parklets.

Public Comments #1:

Greg Ward, resident raised questions and suggestions regarding parklet removal timing; sign locations; clearance under decking for ease of cleaning; street sweeping issues; and propane tank storage.

Chris Wood, Del Mar business owner and resident expressed concern on deck design and water build-up; property owner agreement enforcement; battery DRAFT
Attachment 5
1223
Design Review Subcommittee Adjourned Meeting Minutes April 1, 2026 Page 2 storage; number of spaces approved for parklets; need for additional seating for restaurants with existing patio space; rotting wood; load rating for floor, need for hand rails and other safety concerns; size of bike racks.

Kathy Ward, former council member, planning commission member, and resident commented on the shape of the parklets; suggested two spaces per parklet; opined that parklets program should have ceased when off-site lease agreements ended; and encouraged that the item be placed on a Planning Commission Agenda in June.

Wayne Eggleston, former council member, planning commission member, and resident commented on rushing the project; resurfacing Del Mar; Public Safety concerns, involve Engineering, consider ADA requirements; clarify total tables and chairs in guidelines; umbrella liability; allow Planning Commission to address design; no additional signage necessary for parklets, resonates “swap meet” atmosphere; and the need for concrete traffic-rated planters.

Larry Culbertson, resident expressed parklet size concerns; suggested lower structure; note the planter size and color in guidelines; and suggested that barrier material be dark brown, no plastic or vinyl furniture, dark green umbrellas and to state exact color in guidelines.

Amanda Quintanilla, resident presented a PowerPoint and advised that angle-in parking spaces are stated by staff as beneficial; found cannabis infused gummies in area and empty alcohol cans; expressed concerns on trash accumulation, dying plants, and tsunami zone; opined additional bike racks were not needed; and guidelines should state umbrella color.

The DRSC discussed the project, and made the following comments either individually or as a group:
• Suggested that staff provide extensive background on the initiation of the program and how the program is different now.
• Extend the parklet program through Labor Day and after that the current parklets will be terminated.
• Bring program to Planning Commission at a later date to look at a fundamental design. This could be a built-in or permanent option.
• City Council should determine a date when the new standards are initiated. • Provide list of public comments for additional context to City Council. • There are parking impacts and public health concerns. • Centennial General Plan speaks directly to Avenida Del Mar as heart of the pedestrian district and parklet program needs to consider this. • The design should be considerate of “Spanish Village by the Sea.” • Provide the Council with two options: (a) square-off parklet like Staff’s design or (b) fill up two diagonal spaces with off-set by 1-foot from adjacent spaces and should clip the corners which create all usable space on the dining deck. • Golf cart parking does not work and there are plenty of bike racks. • Need storage for the parklets, in the areas where the corners are clipped.

DRAFT
1224
Design Review Subcommittee Adjourned Meeting Minutes April 1, 2026 Page 3 • Three maximum spaces and some parking spaces between neighboring parklets. • Opportunity to combine parklets with neighboring restaurants and may have a larger total parklet.
• Standardize the colors for wood treatment and umbrellas. • Consider other types of umbrellas.
• Select number of parking spaces/parklets and provide the Council with options. • Update processes to address how a private structure is constructed in the public right-of-way. Inspections should happen and Engineering should weigh in. • Building inspector should look at the guardrail for safety purposes. • Location of the parklet should be publicly noticed.
• Should provide an outlet for parklets that want to deviate from standards, which would require a discretionary process.
• Consider a permanent option for the Beautification for the T-Zone, Pier Bowl, and Avenida Del Mar. This would include sidewalk, street, and building improvements. • Consider who would power wash underneath the parklets and a timeline. • There should be a metal removable sweep that would be at the bottom of the parklet for cleaning purposes, with clearance for power washing. • Determine one standardized planter size and provide a plant palette. • Get rid of the signs on the parklets.
• If a restaurant has an existing structural outdoor patio with designated seating, then they should not receive a parklet.

Public Comments #2:

Amanda Quintanilla suggested terminating the parklet program on July 1, 2026; design of the parklets has cost taxpayers too much money; parklets should not be solid; consider historic building awnings that have discrepancies in colors; and storage on parklets not be allowed.

Wayne Eggleston, opined that the sidewalk is for pedestrians, not for chairs or dining; requested that Coastal Cowboy outdoor dining area be assessed; to not reduce the rental fees, and to use parklet generated funds for additional lease parking and the trolley.

Kathy Ward stated agreement with parklet program terminating after Labor Day and to consider improvements for all of the Avenida Del Mar.

Chris Wood opined that parklets should not be extending through 2029; collected money should be applied toward T-Zone improvements and not go into the General Fund; resolve payment issues with restaurants operators; and to not allow parklets for restaurants with existing patios for seating.

Greg Ward suggested to take down the decks as soon as possible to repair and enhance Avenida Del Mar and Avenida Victoria to encourage positive promotion of downtown; consider parklets after beautification program is complete.

DRAFT
1225
Design Review Subcommittee Adjourned Meeting Minutes April 1, 2026 Page 4

3. NEW BUSINESS
None

4. OLD BUSINESS
None

5. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Amanda Quintanilla expressed concerns with the processing of permits for Coastal Cowboy for an outdoor dining area along the sidewalk.

Chris Wood addressed the line of demarcation between public and private property and asked for clarity on the location of property lines for businesses that have the concrete separator.

6. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved to adjourn the meeting to a Regular Design Review Subcommittee meeting on April 15, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., San Clemente City Hall, First Floor Community Room, 910 Calle Negocio, San Clemente, CA.

Respectfully submitted,
_______________________________
M. Steven Camp, Chair
Attest:
_______________________________
Zach Rehm, Acting City Planner
DRAFT
1226
 















 


 




!"#$%& %'$%%





()
(

 

*

+,-
.
"

%'/"0$100* 2



 



34





5











 
*67




* 8

7






9
:



*;





4






<




*


 



7




 


*=







>




 




    


* ?

3

7 






*?
7





 @

)



ABC

 



7 

9
 :

  C

3

)





*

 

7

5





)
 

 


 


* 













 5

* D

 

7









E F G
H




(G

I

G
(J 

 


;
A



K
A
7

 




* F !$ LM1N1"1O2







7 



7


 5



5




)
 







* F &#
1%01P!%Q%#$ LO:





7








* =
7




)K

 
5


B



 




 R
*


5





)
 
* F S
/M1 1T
O


 

UVWX







Y



3 













* F J



Z

 


 

 

7 



* F G
H


(
3



*([
K 


A


K
3







* F ?



7 

AB




*2








 

7


4
* \ 
"
'%0 ]11T^&_
`$^'L%0`1Pabc% b
"'P$  %`1
/"$'P%Q%
`$^0
"# "
1dec1%0b1
b%0fg, h$''$
ii\Q
1'$]$%
L01%
#cL$1'P1P c1.
''
b$^Q
1T%'."P$^

" 10O
Attachment 6
1227
 









 


!
"!#$

$%&#"
"

'
 

(')
&&
*+$$

'))"!#$

(
'

$
,$$-

('
!& -$

)

$".*'*/01231

)4/
"&

#
!$"'
))!&
-
$"%*  5


6789:;<
7 =<8
7>


?<@@A9B:=>?C$
9?
?
D<

9'

)* E#$
,,!/

$F)
$%

(' GH

''&%)/ $
(-$
$&)'/$


) $,!
)&
##$))
I-"

#
"*  J


K
LJ
MBJKJC9L9+NO

)$#I)$
P


#
Q$&#"% 



(")
R
##-$
ST$ $ U-

)
&&

"V

('/SW,!#'X'$&
))$

-$
 '

' ##&)*  YZYD




5


BYY5CL
?:[

@
<D=<8B\] ^01_4$-&"

)`
,$ `
&&
"V

('*  >


J

<

A<
85


L?


B
<\abbcbbbC-$
defgghgi

)*U

) -$
!
$
#
"'
')&")/)$"$)j
!$&))$ 
)$')

"*  ?
?
D<

k<
5


L?


B
<\]lCm$&))$S%
&,R
,$*S$&#"&)) $-&"
),

$-'

'$





(#%


)$)&
S`

) H##
'S)
"

")*  k<n?

<J


K

A<Bk?JKC
-&"o
$P))$)&p#).#(
Q

""

P
$&" 
$##4$$!
$
#-
$")
#$)$T#_

*  q<<@[
<@
:7@

A<Bq[:C'

)*)-"

#'

)



""$

$F)
 S

!F$%#$))*S+" 


'&

$!'

,$) $&#"#
"$
31O
"&,$)
r' ")/
('


(')
&&
I

,$%
"

$F#'%#-$
-"

#F$%P

$,$-&")* kM

7@<
@@7





A



@
LAs7<



@<
<8

@<tA< n

L<D

<
  u@<
>vB>

7

w8:8
@
Cxm$
Q

#/r#&,#o'`
y#z' `$$#

('#$/))$$#)#$)"$!
 ("
")#$)%$"$ $ *
$&#" %
"",$
#
$##)$
)
#
"",$
#)$
)$Q),'
$##
$&)*_


!
#$))

{
|}11V_
"$ (")*  >@



w8xY-"
!
)($ Q
# 
$R"
$
)
$ ##
!$"Q



r$T#_

 

"%
$
#~
#'-$


('
"
"&'S)



r*S  €

y


)'#/

#o"!
#)
"-$

##$-+!"
T#_

*T
)"
$



)$W

 ")'
"S"
$
o$/S
"!
#)

(

)&"
&,#o"#$)-&



.#(')$$#$
 #%

#$)"&
'$WP$&
)4* 
K

<
@
A

<
  [

<

))
%#)"
#

q
<
@

@


$)))
R
##-$
SV

y$

# &"$$
T'S

$!"'
-$

#


-$



)
&&
).




$

S

(#)S4* 1228 ‚ƒ„
 









 


 


 



  !"# $% &'

()*+%,-./%#"%00
 0
 
 
 


0
0(
10 
0 

 2(
 
34#*5&*,-6%78*+ +9:,%;%+7<-,=6:;,>  
0


?0
 
(
 






 @ #- .# 

ABCCDCCC<#<E E/%

 ?
0
(


 ?
 

FF0 
( ?
G
H 

( 00
0
 I
?


 
GH
J

 ?






 






( 

0?


 J?K


 L?00? 

 ( 
M 0 N0? O
 ?


(
H
 
 ?  


P



 


(
0

 F0?
0 
K
Q00 L
F0?  RQSQT00 
U



 ? 
  
V


00V00

(





N


M
(0?
W
 (
 W
1 0

X 
0? 


 


? U




(  ?

F

(

Y



 
 ?
 00
V0
V(
00

 Z[ 

  
? 
 
0
V (
 
VK ? \
J
N
0]
L0I0
 I

J(

(

00
 

0(


 ?( 
? 
?0

 0
 GN

; +^<#! #_6+ #,8*+- E*#`%7 #_a # !%7%#-=6`a>@-"_9K 0 QTQbc QTQdL
 G0001 Aefe7<gg<*#0? QTQh
? 

0((Ai8%+ ,j" +%k**-(

0


0
G

0
l

mF  U0? 


1
(hQ
0

X 


 ? 0

 in*k-'%-*- g
_*o#-*o#8"pg<&8 +^<#!,-*&^K

RTTT
0
L
 J


0

/<- g+*g%0? 
0 Z[ N
    
(



 F
1229




 


! "
#$ %&'(' )$ *+*, -+./* 0" 1 2''
$ 34# 5 6
77'$ 8
9 :;<5! 3=>?@=>? A08BC?D EFGHI JKL MNOHFFP QRSRST RU TPLVOW XNO OKLPL RU V YRZROW VSH OKL YRZRO KVU XLLS PLV[KLH\ JKL [ROI RU YFFURST V SNZXLP F] ^VP_RST U^V[LU XLKRSH `aL QLY bVPW VSH ZVSI F] OKL MNOHFFP QRSRST RU XYF[_RST PLOVRY UKF^ UOFPL ]PFSOU\ JKL SLG cFGXFI PLUOVNPVSO SFO FSYI OFF_ ^VP_RST U^V[LU VGVIW XNO XYF[_LH PLOVRY UOFPLUW VSH OFF_ VGVI OKPLL ^VP_RST U^V[LU ]PFZ OKL dNSHVI eVPZLPfU bVP_LOW GKR[K KVU VS `TPLLZLSO GROK OKL [ROI\ `HHRgFSVYYI OKLPL RU SF LS]FP[LZLSO ]FP OKL OGF KFNPU\ `U NUNVY OKL QLY bVP ^VP_RST RU OV_LS XI QLY bVP LZ^YFILLU VSH FGSLPU\ JV_L ]FP LhVZ^YL OKL JV[F UKF^ RS OKL ijj XYF[_kRO RU V XRT OPN[_ GROK OKL SVZL F] OKL JV[F XNURSLUU FS OKL OPN[_k RO RU VYGVIU ^VP_LH HVRYI RS ]PFSO VSH SFOKRST KVU XLLS HFSL\ lKLS m GVU FS [ROI [FNS[RY VSH ^YVSSRST [FZZRUURFSW nRZ EFYYFGVIW LUOVXYRUKLH V oVP_RST bVSVTLZLSO oYVSW GKR[K GVU LpL[gaLW NSgY [FaRH KRO VSH OKLS VYY ]LYY XI OKL GVIURHL\ oVRH ^VP_RST RU V SFS UOVPOLPq QVSV oFRSOW cVPYUXVHW VSH rS[RSROVU sXLV[K OFGSU HF SFO KVaL ^VRH ^VP_RSTt\ QF GL GRUK OF YFF_ YR_L uVTNSV vLV[K FP M[LVSURHLw dVS cYLZLSOL RU V aLPI U^L[RVY ^YV[L VSH ]PLL HFGSOFGS ^VP_RST XLSLxOU PLOVRYLPU\ eRPUO OKL [ROI OFF_ VGVI ZVSI ^VP_RST U^V[LUW OKLS OKLS [FSURHLPRST ^VRH ^VP_RST\ mO HFLU SFO ZV_L ULSUL\ oVRH ^VP_RST RS V UZVYY HFGSOFGS RU SFO XLSLx[RVY OF UKF^U\ ELPL VPL V ]LG UNTTLUgFSUy z EM{| o`|}m~W m~dJr`Q Me JlM EM{| r~eM|crbr~JkcM~dmdJr~J m~cu{Qrd Qru b`| `~Q o{vumc o`|}m~ uMJd vrEm~Q Qr b`| rdJ`vumdE rbouM€rr o`|}m~ uMJd ~M bM|r M{JkQMM| Qm~m~klr E`r |r`cErQ M{| umbmJ\ JKVS_ IFN lVISL rTTYLUOFS

1230

OUTDOOR DINING

AVENIDA DEL MAR
1231
4/1/2026 2
Cannabis
Infused
1232
4/1/2026

3 Half a bottle.

Found in planters
1233

NO PLANT MAINTENANCE
4/1/2026

4 No water and no fresh potting soil results to dead plants.

Some store owners maintain their own plants or hire  landscaping companies. A couple of us water plants on Del Mar since COVID.
1234
211 AVENIDA DEL MAR
4/1/2026

5 Uniform color:
a) Awning
b) Umbrella
Uniform pot per City
specifications.

Plant:

Mandevilla Flowering
Shrubs
Red and pink.
1235

BIKE RACKS ARE ON AVENIDA DEL
MAR.
4/1/2026

6 1236

EVEN MORE BIKE RACKS ON DEL MAR
4/1/2026

7 1237
4/1/2026

8 August 2025
August  2
017
September
2021
1238

OUTDOOR DINING
ON AVENIDA VICTORIA
1239
4/1/2026

10 1240
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8C.

Submitted By: Beaches, Parks and Recreation
Prepared By: Samantha Wylie, Beaches, Parks & Recreation Director Subject:
..titl e
PUBLIC HEARING – INTRODUCTION (FIRST READING) OF ORDINANCE NO. 1801 ADDING SECTION 12.28.025 TO THE SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE TEE TIME RESERVATIONS ..body
Summary:

Staff has identified increasing instances of unauthorized third-party activity at the San Clemente Municipal Golf Course, including the advertising, brokering, and resale of tee time reservations, as well as the use of automated software to secure reservations in ways that limit equitable public access. These practices undermine confidence in the reservation system, reduce availability for residents and lawful users, and allow private parties to commercially exploit the municipal golf course.

The proposed ordinance establishes Municipal Code provisions defining tee time reservations as revocable licenses, prohibiting unauthorized commercial activity and automated booking practices, and providing enforcement authority to protect fair public access.

As part of the continued public hearing, the ordinance has been updated to include an escalating administrative and criminal citation structure for violations consisting of a $500 fine for a first violation, $750 for a second violation, and $1,000 for each subsequent violation within one year.

This penalty framework is intended to provide a clear and effective deterrent while supporting consistent enforcement.

Background:

The City manages tee time reservations through operational rules, policies, and fee schedules adopted under Title 12 of the San Clemente Municipal Code. Tee time reservations are a limited public resource issued subject to City rules and reservation controls.

At the initial public hearing on this item, the City Council reviewed the proposed ordinance and continued the public hearing to allow staff to refine enforcement provisions further. The City Council directed staff to return with an increased starting administrative citation penalty to strengthen the ordinance’s deterrent effect.

In response, staff has revised the ordinance to incorporate an escalating administrative citation structure. Staff continues to recommend codifying these standards within the Municipal Code to provide clarity, consistency, and stronger enforcement tools. 1241
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8C.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
Discussion:

The proposed ordinance adds Section 12.28.025 to the San Clemente Municipal Code to establish clear standards governing municipal golf course tee time reservations. The ordinance clarifies that tee times are revocable, non-transferable licenses issued by the City and do not constitute property rights. It prohibits unauthorized commercial activity, including resale, brokering, advertising, or accepting compensation in connection with securing tee times without prior written City authorization. The ordinance also prohibits the use of automated means, such as bots or scripts, to obtain reservations in a manner that circumvents City controls.

The ordinance establishes enforcement authority allowing the City to void or cancel tee times obtained in violation of the Municipal Code, pursue administrative, civil, and criminal remedies, and suspend or restrict reservation privileges where violations occur. These provisions are intended to protect equitable access to municipal recreational facilities, preserve public confidence in the reservation system, and prevent unauthorized private exploitation of Citycontrolled resources.

The ordinance is narrowly tailored to regulate conduct rather than speech and provides a clear code-based framework to support consistent enforcement while preserving lawful access for the general public.

Considerations Identified by Staff:

Codifying the prohibition of unauthorized resale and automated booking practices provides clarity for the public and third-party platforms regarding acceptable use of the City’s reservation system.

Additionally, the escalating administrative citation structure provides a balanced enforcement approach that allows the City to address violations efficiently while deterring repeat activity. The proposed escalating penalty schedule is consistent with an administrative citation structure that provides a penalty based on repeat violations.

Lastly, adoption of the ordinance will strengthen the City’s ability to protect equitable access to tee times and preserve the integrity of the reservation system for residents and lawful users.

Council Options:
 Introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 1801, adding Section 12.28.025 to the San Clemente Municipal Code, regulating municipal golf course tee time reservations.  Modify the ordinance and conduct the first reading as amended.  Continue the item with direction to staff to provide additional information.  Take no action.

Environmental Review/Analysis:

The proposed ordinance is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 because it does not involve construction or any activity that could result in a physical change to the environment.
1242
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8C.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3
Fiscal Impact:

Adoption of the ordinance is not anticipated to create any direct fiscal impact. The ordinance establishes enforcement provisions, including administrative citation penalties for violations.

While these penalties may result in incidental revenue to the City, the amount of such revenue cannot be determined at this time and is not the primary purpose of the ordinance. The ordinance intends to deter unauthorized commercial activity related to municipal golf course tee time reservations and to protect equitable public access to the City’s recreational facilities.

Recommended Action(s):
..recommendation
Staff Recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing; and

2. Introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 1801, adding Section 12.28.025 to the San Clemente Municipal Code regulating municipal golf course tee time reservations. ..end
Attachment:

1. Ordinance No. 1801
Notification:

Dave Cook Pro Shop
1243
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. 1801

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION

12.28.025 TO THE SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL CODE

RELATING TO MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE TEE TIME

RESERVATIONS
WHEREAS, Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution authorizes the City of San Clemente (“City”) to enact and enforce ordinances that regulate conditions which may be public nuisances or health hazards, or promote social, economic or aesthetic considerations, the City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is necessary to promote the health, safety, welfare, and recreational opportunities of the community; and WHEREAS, the City owns, operates, and maintains municipal golf courses and related recreational facilities for the benefit of the general public; and WHEREAS, the City Council has a legitimate and substantial interest in ensuring that access to City recreational facilities is fair, transparent, and consistent with Cityadopted policies and fee schedules; and WHEREAS, tee time reservations at City-operated golf courses are a limited and finite public resource, the availability of which is controlled by the City through reservation systems and operational rules; and
WHEREAS, the City issues tee time reservations as revocable, non-transferable licenses to access City property, and such reservations do not constitute property rights or transferable interests; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has become aware that certain third parties have, without City approval, advertised, offered, brokered, or resold tee time reservations for City golf courses for private profit, including through online platforms and other commercial means; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that some third parties use automated software, scripts, bots, or similar technological means to acquire tee time reservations in a manner that circumvents City reservation controls and restricts public access; and WHEREAS, such unauthorized commercial activity interferes with the City’s ability to manage its facilities, undermines public confidence in City reservation systems, limits access for residents and lawful users, and allows private parties to profit from Citycontrolled resources without authorization; and WHEREAS, while the City currently regulates tee time reservations through operating resolutions, course rules, and administrative policies adopted under Title 12 of the San Clemente Municipal Code, those provisions do not expressly prohibit third-party resale, brokering, advertising, or automated acquisition of tee times; and 1244
Ordinance No.1801 Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary and appropriate to codify clear standards of conduct relating to municipal golf course tee time reservations in order to provide effective enforcement authority and protect the public interest; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance is intended to regulate conduct, not speech, and is narrowly tailored to prevent unauthorized commercial exploitation of City recreational facilities while preserving lawful access for the general public.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente, California, hereby ordains as follows:

SECTION 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

SECTION 2. San Clemente Municipal Code Chapter 12.28 is hereby amended to add Section 12.28.025, to read as follows:

Section 12.28.025, Municipal Golf Course Tee Time Reservations A. Definitions
For purposes of this Section, the following definitions shall apply:
“Automated Means” includes, but is not limited to, bots, scripts, software programs, automated purchasing tools, scraping tools, or any technological process designed to obtain reservations faster or in greater volume than a human user. “City Golf Course” means any golf course owned, operated, or managed by the City of San Clemente, including all related facilities. “Commercial Activity” means advertising, offering for sale, selling, reselling, brokering, soliciting, or receiving compensation or anything of value in exchange for a tee time.
“Reservation Holder” means the individual in whose name a tee time is issued. “Tee Time” means a reservation, booking, or scheduled time issued by or on behalf of the City, granting limited permission to access a City golf course for play. “Third Party” means any person or entity other than the Reservation Holder or the City.

B. Tee Times Revocable
All Tee Times for a City Golf Course are revocable licenses issued subject to City rules and policies, and shall not be sold, assigned, transferred, or used for any Commercial Activity unless expressly authorized in advance in writing by the City.

C. Prohibited Conduct
It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to:

1. Advertise, offer, sell, resell, broker, solicit, or attempt to sell a Tee Time for a City Golf Course without prior written authorization from the City;

2. Acquire or attempt to acquire Tee Times for the purpose of resale or Commercial Activity;
1245
Ordinance No.1801 Page 3

3. Use automated means to access, reserve, block, or secure Tee Times;

4. Advertise or represent, expressly or impliedly, that a person or entity is authorized to sell or secure Tee Times on behalf of the City when no such authorization exists; and

5. Accept compensation or anything of value in connection with securing or attempting to secure a Tee Time for another person.

D. Enforcement and Remedies

1. Any violation of this Chapter constitutes a public nuisance and may be enforced by any lawful means, including administrative citation, civil action, and/or injunctive relief.

2. A violation of this Chapter is an infraction punishable by a fine not exceeding $500.00 for the first offense, a fine not exceeding $750.00 for the second offense of the same provision within one year, and a fine not exceeding $1,000.00 for each additional offense of the same provision within one year.

3. Administrative fines shall not exceed $500.00 for a first violation, $750.00 for a second violation of the same municipal ordinance violation within one year, and $1,000.00 for each additional violation of the same municipal ordinance violation within one year. The fine amounts for infractions set forth in subsection D(2) above shall not apply to this subsection and shall in no way limit the amounts that may be imposed for administrative fines.

4. The City may void or cancel any Tee Time obtained or used in violation of this Chapter without refund.

5. Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate and distinct violation.

6. In addition to any other remedy, the City may seek disgorgement of unlawfully obtained proceeds, and recovery of enforcement costs and attorney’s fees as authorized by this Code.

7. In addition to any other remedy, the City may suspend, restrict, or revoke a person’s ability to reserve or use City Golf Course facilities, including disabling online reservation access, for a period of time deemed appropriate by the City, where the City determines that such person has violated this Chapter or has knowingly obtained or used a tee time secured in violation of this Chapter.

E. No Limitation on Other Authority
Nothing in this Section shall be construed to limit the City’s authority to enforce other provisions of this Code, deny or revoke access privileges, require compliance with Title 5 (Business Licenses), or pursue remedies under applicable state or federal law.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its adoption.
1246
Ordinance No.1801 Page 4
SECTION 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within fifteen (15) days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of San Clemente, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with California Government Code section 36933.

SECTION 5. Records. The documents and materials associated with this Ordinance that constitute the record of proceedings on which the City Council’s findings and determinations are based are located at City Hall, 910 Calle Negocio, San Clemente, CA 92673.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or applications of the ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _____________, 2026.

ATTEST:
______________________________ ______________________________ City Clerk of the City of Rick Loeffler, Mayor of the City of San Clemente, California San Clemente, California
1247
Ordinance No.1801 Page 5

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, Laura Campagnolo, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1801 having been regularly introduced at the meeting of _________, 2026, was again introduced, the reading in full thereof unanimously waived, and duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ______ day of _________________, 2026, and said ordinance was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this ______ day of ______________, ______. _____________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
1248
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8D.

Submitted By: Community Development
Prepared By: Adam Atamian, Community Development Director Rachel Perez, Emergency Management Specialist
Subject:
..titl e
PUBLIC HEARING ON WEED ABATEMENT 2026 - ORDER TO ABATE NUISANCES BY

HAVING WEEDS, RUBBISH, AND REFUSE, REMOVED FROM VACANT AND UNOCCUPIED,

DEVELOPED PROPERTIES, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ..body
Summary:

The City Council is being asked to conduct a Public Hearing concerning the abatement of weeds, rubbish, and refuse, and to consider adoption of a Resolution authorizing the Community Development Director to address these nuisances. If adopted, the City’s weed abatement contractor will initiate the clearance of vacant properties in San Clemente that fail to meet the City’s weed abatement standards beginning on May 15, 2026. The costs incurred by the weed abatement contractor for clearing non-compliant lots will be invoiced to the respective property owners. Any bills that remain outstanding at the end of 2026 will be submitted to the County for the imposition of liens to recover the costs.

Background:

At the March 17, 2026 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution 26-54 declaring weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt upon streets, sidewalks, parkways and private property to be public nuisances and providing for their abatement. On April 1, 2026, the City’s weed abatement contractor completed the required public notification process by mailing “notification of the need to abate” letters to owners of 528 vacant and unoccupied properties in the City. This list was compiled using the most current information provided by the Orange County Assessor’s office.

Considerations Identified by Staff:

The annual Weed Abatement Program serves as a critical component of the City’s wildfire risk reduction and nuisance abatement efforts by addressing hazardous vegetation and debris on vacant and unoccupied properties. Through the declaration of these conditions as a public nuisance pursuant to Government Code Sections 39561–39568, the City is able to implement a uniform and efficient process to ensure properties are maintained in a manner that reduces fire risk and protects surrounding neighborhoods.

The program is structured to prioritize property owner responsibility by providing notice and a reasonable opportunity for voluntary compliance before any City-initiated abatement occurs. In cases where properties remain non-compliant, the City may proceed with abatement and recover associated costs from the property owner, including through the placement of liens if necessary. 1249
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8D.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
This framework supports cost recovery and helps minimize impacts to the General Fund while maintaining consistent enforcement.

Absent continuation of the program for 2026, the City would need to rely on individual code enforcement actions to address vegetation-related hazards, which may be less timely and effective in responding to seasonal fire risk conditions. Maintaining the program ensures a proactive, standardized approach to managing these hazards citywide and supports the City’s broader efforts to reduce wildfire risk and maintain community health and safety.

Council Options:
• Adopt Resolution 26-57 directing the abatement of weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt upon streets, sidewalks, parkways, and private property.
• Continue the item with direction to provide additional information. • Provide specific direction to City staff for action.
• Deny Resolution 26-57 with direction to reconsider the item.

Environmental Review/Analysis:

The Community Development Department completed an initial environmental assessment of the project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff recommends the City Council determine the project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(h) (Class 1: Existing Facilities), 15308 (Class 8: Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment), and 15321 (Class 21: Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies) because the project is limited to maintenance of existing landscaping, native growth, and water supply reservoirs, the project consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment, and the project consists of actions by regulatory agencies to enforce a law, general rule, standard, or objective, administered or adopted by the regulatory agency.

Fiscal Impact:

The Weed Abatement Program is budgeted annually in the General Fund and $181,060 was appropriated for fiscal year 2026 to cover all program costs (Account No. 001-452-43470).

Recapture of the costs occur from payment by property owners or when the lien on the property is addressed.

Recommended Action(s):

Staff Recommendation ..recommendation
STAFF RECOMMENDS the City Council consider adoption of Resolution No. 26-57 entitled A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA,

ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO ABATE THE NUISANCES

BY HAVING WEEDS, RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT REMOVED FROM VACANT

PROPERTIES AND UNOCCUPIED, DEVELOPED PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY,

NOTIFYING THE STATE, COUNTY, OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC AGENCY AND FINDING THE 1250
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8D.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3

PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER SECTIONS 15301, 15308, AND 15321 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES (14 CCR § 15301(h), CLASS 1: EXISTING FACILITIES, 15308, CLASS 8: ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES FOR PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, AND 15321, CLASS 21: ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES).
..end
Attachments:

1. Resolution 26-57

2. Private Property List

3. Affidavit of Mailing Notice

4. Letter to Property Owner’s

5. Notice of Public Hearing published in the San Clemente Times Notification:

E. Stewart & Associates, Inc.

Notice of Public Hearing Letter Mailed to Vacant Lot List Property Owners Notice of Public Hearing notice published in San Clemente Times 1251
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 26-57

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO ABATE THE NUISANCES BY

HAVING WEEDS, RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT REMOVED

FROM VACANT PROPERTIES AND UNOCCUPIED, DEVELOPED

PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY, NOTIFYING THE STATE,

COUNTY, OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC AGENCY, AND FINDING THE

PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER SECTIONS
15301, 15308, AND 15321 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES (14 CCR
§§ 15301(h), CLASS 1: EXISTING FACILITIES, 15308, CLASS 8:

ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES FOR PROTECTION OF
THE ENVIRONMENT, AND 15321, CLASS 21: ENFORCEMENT

ACTIONS BY REGULATORY AGENCIES)
WHEREAS, the City Council of San Clemente on March 17, 2026, adopted Resolution 26-54, pursuant to Sections 39561 and 39562 of the California Government Code, declaring weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt upon streets, sidewalks, parkways, and private property to be public nuisances and providing for the abatement thereof; and WHEREAS, the Code Compliance Division has completed the necessary public notices to owners of each parcel identified in the Weed Abatement Program, as listed in Exhibit 1 of Resolution 26-54; and
WHEREAS, these property owners have been notified that all weeds must be cut to a height no higher than one inch (1") from the ground and their property must be maintained in this manner for the remainder of the calendar year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 39567.1, these property owners have been informed that if they do not remove the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt, then the City will remove these nuisances, and the cost of the removal plus all related administrative costs will be billed to the non-compliant property owners; and if these costs are not paid to the City when billed, those costs will be assessed upon the land from or in front of which the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt are removed and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid; and
WHEREAS, these property owners have been properly notified of the public hearing on this matter; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, and received, heard and considered all evidence and testimony presented at and before such public hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Clemente does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1252
Resolution No. 26-57 Page 2
SECTION 1: Incorporation of Recitals.

The City Council hereby finds that all of the facts in the Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated and adopted as fully set forth in this resolution.

SECTION 2: CEQA Findings.

Based upon its review of the entire record, including the Staff Report, any public comments or testimony presented to the City Council, and the facts outlined below, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(h) (Class 1:

Existing Facilities), 15308 (Class 8: Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment), and 15321 (Class 21: Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies).

The Class 1 exemption specifically exempts from further CEQA review the operation, repair, maintenance, and minor repair of existing public or private structures, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. This exemption covers, but is not limited to, maintenance of existing landscaping, native growth, and water supply reservoirs. The project does not change the existing general use of the site. Thus, the project qualifies for the Class 1 exemption.

The Class 8 exemption specifically exempts from further CEQA review actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. The purpose of the weed abatement process is to protect the City’s environmental resources by reducing the possibility of weed and debris fires in San Clemente. Thus, the project qualifies for the Class 8 exemption.

The Class 21 exemption specifically exempts from further CEQA review actions taken by regulatory agencies to enforce a law, general rule, standard, or objective, administered or adopted by the regulatory agency. The weed abatement process enforces Resolution 26-54, entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Clemente, California, Pursuant to Section 39561 And 39562 of the California Government Code Declaring Weeds, Rubbish, Refuse, And Dirt Upon Streets, Sidewalks, Parkways, and Private Property to be Public Nuisances and Providing for the Abatement Thereof.” Thus, the project qualifies for the Class 21 exemption.

Furthermore, none of the exceptions to the use of the Class 1, 8, and 21 categorical exemptions identified in State CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The project will not result in a cumulative impact from successive projects of the same type in the same place over time. The weed abatement process consists of regular maintenance activities to reduce the risk of fires in the City. There are no unusual circumstances surrounding the project that result in a reasonable possibility of a significant effect on the environment because the project is limited to the removal of weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt upon streets, sidewalks, parkways, and private property. The project will not damage scenic resources, including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources. The project does not include any hazardous waste sites, and the project will not cause a 1253
Resolution No. 26-57 Page 3
substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project will be carried out on vacant or unoccupied, structured lots with no historical resources affected.

And the project has no possibility of a direct or foreseeable indirect significant impact on the environment. Thus, the Class 1, 8, and 21 exemptions apply, and no further environmental review is required.

SECTION 3: The City Council, pursuant to Government Code section 39571, hereby directs the Community Development Director, or their designee, to abate the nuisances by having the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt removed from vacant and unoccupied, developed properties within the City of San Clemente that are not in compliance with the weed abatement standards, as indicated on the notices mailed to the property owners, at such owners’ cost, at such time as the City’s Weed Abatement Contractor arrives at the property and to notify the State, County, or any other public agency of such nuisances.

SECTION 4: The cost of the removal plus all related administrative costs will be billed to the non-compliant property owners; and if these costs are not paid to the City when billed, those costs will be assessed upon the land from or in front of which the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt are removed and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid.

SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of _________________, 2026.

ATTEST:
_______________________________ _____________________________ City Clerk of the City of Rick Loeffler, Mayor of the City San Clemente, California of San Clemente, California
1254
Resolution No. 26-57 Page 4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 26-57 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Clemente held on the _____ day of _________________, ________, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this _____ day of _________________, ________. __________________________
CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
Approved as to form:
___________________________
Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
1255
Attachment 2 – Vacant Lot List is on file with the City Clerk. 5 1256
Attachment 3
1257
City of San Clemente
Community Development
Weed Abatement Program
Phone: (949) 498-9250 Fax: (949) 498-4961
E-Mail: [email protected]
Dear Property Owner:

Every spring the City of San Clemente notifies the property owners of undeveloped parcels and vacant, developed parcels of their responsibility to remove weeds and debris from those properties. The native and naturalized landscape of San Clemente is susceptible to fire, along with the trash and debris that can collect on unoccupied properties. Therefore, it is very important to reduce this fire potential through the removal of weeds and debris.

Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, the City Council of the City of San Clemente will be asked to adopt a Resolution declaring that noxious or dangerous weeds may be growing upon or in front of the type of properties described above and that these weeds constitute a public nuisance which must be abated by the removal of the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt. These properties, including yours, will be described more specifically in the draft Resolution presented to the City Council on that date.

Once the Resolution is adopted, should you choose not to remove the weeds and debris, they will be removed by the City, and the cost of removal billed to you. If not paid, the amount, including the City's administrative costs, will be assessed upon the land from which, or in front of which, the weeds and debris are removed and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. In 2025 these administrative costs per lot were $200.00. A copy of the draft Resolution will be included in the Staff Report for this item, which will be posted to the City's website at www.san-clemente.org at least 72 hours prior to the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting. You may also request that a copy of the report be provided to you by contacting the City Clerk's Office by calling (949) 361-8303 or by emailing CityClerk@san-clemente,org.

If you disagree with the proposed removal of the weeds and debris, you are encouraged to address the City Council at its meeting of Tuesday, April 21, 2026, at 5:30 p.m., held at San Clemente City Hall, Council Chambers, 91 O Calle Negocio, San Clemente, when objections will be heard and given due consideration. The agenda for this meeting, which includes methods in which to address Council, will be posted to the City's website at www.san-clemente.org at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

PLEASE NOTE: This notice refers to a parcel number(s) listed by the County Assessor's office most recent tax roll in your name. If you feel the property in question should not be included in the weed abatement program or you no longer are the owner of the undeveloped parcel or vacant, developed property, please contact the City's Contractual Weed Abatement Administrator, Stewart & Associates at (949) 498-9250, by email at [email protected], or by mail at: City of San Clemente Weed Abatement, c/o 944 Calle Amanecer Ste. M, San Clemente, CA 92673. Please indicate the reason why your property should not be included in the weed abatement program. Please postmark any written correspondence to be received by May 15, 2026. If you wish to clean your own lot, your lot must be cleared to City standards by May 15, 2026, which require that weeds be cut to a height no higher than one inch (1 ") from the ground and all debris/trash be removed. Please note, the work required by the Weed Abatement Program is separate from, and in addition to, any vegetation management which may be required by the Orange County Fire Authority. The property owner must maintain the property in that manner for the remainder of the calendar year. All lots will be inspected for compliance. Please contact (949) 498-92 0 if you require additional information regarding weed abatement.

Adam Atamian, Community Development
Director
City of San Clemente Weed Abatement, c/o 944 Calle Amanecer Ste. M, San Clemente CA 92673 www.san-clemente.org Attachment 4
1258

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC

HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA,
RELATIVE TO THE FOLLOWING:

Weed Abatement Program 2026
Public Hearing to consider all objections or protests, if any, to the proposed abatement of weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt upon streets, sidewalks, parkways and private property within the City of San Clemente. Further information may be obtained by contacting the Emergency Management Program at (949) 361-6113.

If you challenge this item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of San Clemente at, or prior to, the public hearing.

To allow staff adequate time to confirm software compatibility, individuals wishing to utilize electronic visual aids to supplement their oral presentations at the meeting, must submit the electronic files to the City Clerk by no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Only compatible electronic formats will be permitted to be used on City audio/visual computer equipment. Staff makes no guarantee that such material will be compatible, but will use its best efforts to accommodate the request.

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be conducted by the San Clemente City Council on Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 910 Calle Negocio, 2
nd floor, San Clemente. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing or to provide written communication to the City Council to express their opinion for or against the project.

LAURA CAMPAGNOLO
City Clerk and Ex-Officio
Clerk of the Council
1259
910 Calle Negocio
2nd Floor
San Clemente, California
www.san-clemente.org

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 1
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8E.

Submitted By: Community Development
Prepared By: Zach Rehm, Acting City Planner
Araceli Mejia, Assistant Planner
Subject:
..titl e

PUBLIC HEARING - INTRODUCTION (FIRST READING) OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING AMENDMENT (ZA) 26-066, TO AMEND SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.50.010 RELATING TO URBAN LOT SPLITS, AND SECTION 17.86.010

RELATING TO TWO-UNIT PROJECTS, CONSISTENT WITH HOUSING ELEMENT

COMMITMENT AND STATE LAW, AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
..body ACT
Summary:

Senate Bill 9 (SB 9), adopted by the California Legislature in 2021, requires local jurisdictions to allow, on a ministerial basis, up to two residential units on parcels zoned for single-family use and to allow qualifying parcels to be subdivided into two lots (“urban lot splits”). The legislation was enacted as part of the State’s broader effort to address California’s housing shortage by increasing housing opportunities within existing residential neighborhoods, while limiting local discretion to deny or condition such projects. In 2024, the Legislature adopted Senate Bill 450 (SB 450), which amended SB 9 to further constrain local regulatory authority by removing or limiting certain local development standards and approval criteria that were determined to be inconsistent with State law. The City previously adopted local regulations in 2021 and 2022 to implement SB 9. However, recent amendments under SB 450 require additional updates to the San Clemente Municipal Code to ensure continued compliance with State law and to maintain consistency with the City’s certified Housing Element.

The City Council is being asked to consider amendments to San Clemente Municipal Code (SCMC) Title 16, Subdivisions, and Title 17, Zoning. The proposed amendments are updates to the City’s regulations for urban lots splits and two-unit projects consistent with Housing Element commitments and State law. Additionally, the proposed Ordinance finds the amendments to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per the Community Plan exemption pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3).

The proposed amendments primarily remove or modify local standards that are no longer permissible and clarify development regulations to align with current statutory requirements, and are largely technical and compliance-oriented in nature and are not expected to substantially increase development activity beyond current levels. However, adoption of the ordinance is necessary to ensure that the City’s regulations remain enforceable, legally defensible, and consistent with State housing law.
1260
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8E.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 2
Background:

In recent years, the State of California has adopted a series of laws intended to increase housing production by limiting local regulatory discretion over residential development. SB 9 is one such law and applies specifically to parcels zoned for single-family residential use. SB 9 was passed by the California Legislature on September 16, 2021 to add Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7, which impose limits on local authority to regulate urban lot splits and two-unit projects. The law requires that local jurisdictions ministerially approve housing developments with no more than two-primary units in a single-family zone, the subdivision of a parcel in a singlefamily zone into two parcels, or both. While the law allows a local agency to apply objective development standards such as setbacks and height, or objective subdivision standards like lot depths, the standards may not physically preclude either of the following:
 Up to two primary units on the subject parcel, or in the case of a lot split, up to two primary units on each of the resulting parcels.
 Each primary unit shall be allowed to be at least 800 square feet in size.

Eligibility for either a two-unit project or an urban lot split under the provisions of SB 9 is contingent upon the zoning of the site. Parcels must be located in a single-family residential zone; meaning parcels located in other zones that allow single-family residential uses are not subject to SB 9 mandates.

In response to SB 9, the City adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1723 on December 7, 2021 to establish appropriate objective standards for urban lot splits and two-unit projects under SB 9. In December of 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1748 which amended the SCMC to comply with State law and appropriately regulate projects under SB 9. The SCMC now needs to be updated to remove certain standards that State law dictates local governments may no longer enforce and clarify other standards to be consistent with State law.

In 2024, the State adopted SB 450 which amended SB 9 to further limit local authority by eliminating or narrowing certain standards and findings that cities had previously relied upon to regulate these developments. Among other changes, SB 450 clarifies that local standards may not be applied in a manner that constrains the development potential required by State law and limits the ability of local agencies to deny qualifying projects.

As a result of these statutory changes, portions of the City’s existing regulations are no longer consistent with State law and must be revised or removed. The proposed amendments are intended to bring the SCMC into compliance, clarify applicable standards for applicants and staff, and implement Housing Element Program 14, which commits the City to removing governmental constraints to housing development.

On March 4, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed this project and voted to forward the Zoning Amendment to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption.

Discussion:

The proposed amendments primarily focus on removing or modifying local standards that are no longer permitted under State law, while retaining objective standards to the extent allowed. The 1261
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8E.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 3
changes do not expand the scope of SB 9 beyond what State law already requires, but instead ensure that the City’s regulations remain enforceable and consistent with current statutory limitations.

The proposed ordinance (Attachment 1) would amend two sections of the SCMC:

Section 16.50.010 – Urban Lot Splits (Attachment1, Exhibit A) Urban Lot Splits require a local agency to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split that meets SB 9-specific requirements. An urban lot split is the subdivision of an existing, legally subdivided lot into two lots in accordance with the requirements of Government Code § 66411.7 et seq.

Section 17.86.010 – Two-Unit Projects (Attachment 1, Exhibit B) Two-unit projects require a local agency to ministerially approve two residential units within a single-family zone, without discretionary review, if the proposed two-unit project meets all the requirements set forth by Government Code § 65852.21 et seq.

The proposed amendments to these sections reflect the following:
 The City may no longer impose standards on second primary dwelling units that do not apply to the underlying zone. Additionally, the City may no longer impose standards on urban lot splits unless they relate to the design or improvement of parcels.  The amendments include modification of unit standards to include an increase in maximum floor area to be consistent with the City’s ADU standards and a change in height restrictions to match that of the underlying zone, as identified in Attachment 1, Exhibits A and B.  Consistent with State law, the update would change the lot size requirements under SB 9 to create no more than two new parcels of approximately equal lot areas.  The City’s ability to deny a project based on a “specific adverse impact” must meet a heightened statutory threshold, reducing the circumstances under which such findings may be made.
 The update would incorporate the SB 450 requirement for the City to ministerially review qualifying applications within 60 days.

Considerations Identified by Staff:

The proposed amendments are necessary to maintain compliance with State housing law and to implement the City’s Housing Element commitments to remove governmental constraints to housing development. Failure to update the Municipal Code could result in provisions that are unenforceable or inconsistent with State law, creating uncertainty for applicants and potential legal exposure for the City.

Updating the two-unit project and urban lot split portions of the SCMC will maintain consistency with State law and with the Housing Element 6th Cycle commitment to remove any constraints that may hinder development of housing. Program 14 of the Housing Action Plan (part of the 1262
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8E.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 4
Housing Element) established that the City shall address and remove governmental constraints affecting the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and/or welfare of the community as it meets community needs and conditions within the limitations set by State law. The project is reflective of the City’s review, direction, and independent judgement regarding land use.

Based on the City’s experience since adoption of SB 9 regulations in 2021, staff notes that relatively few applications have been submitted. Accordingly, the proposed amendments are not anticipated to result in a significant increase in development activity, but will ensure that future applications are processed in a clear, consistent, and legally compliant manner. The zoning amendments will help property owners understand their rights and responsibilities, and help the City maintain a positive working relationship with the State to support housing, subject to codified local standards.

Council Options:
 Conduct the public hearing, and introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1805 (Attachment 1) approving the Zoning Amendment (Attachment 1, Exhibits A and B) and finding the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.  Continue the item with direction to staff to revise the Zoning Amendment or provide additional information.
 Decline to introduce the ordinance, which could result in the City being out of compliance with State housing law and Housing Element requirements, which may expose the City to enforcement actions or loss of Housing Element compliance status.

Environmental Review/Analysis:

Since the proposed amendments implement standards consistent with the land uses and development intensities analyzed in the certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Housing Element Update, and because the project would not introduce any new or peculiar, potentially significant environmental impacts, the SCMC amendments are eligible for the streamlined environmental review and exemption from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Sec. 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

Additionally, the project is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment, and where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, the project is not subject to CEQA (Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).). The proposed zoning and subdivision municipal code amendments involve a policy action to align the City’s regulations with State law requirements related to implementation of the Housing Element and the removal of constraints on housing development. The amendments do not authorize or increase the intensity of development beyond what is already permitted under State law, but instead revise or eliminate local standards that are no longer enforceable. As such, the amendments do not result in any new development potential or physical changes to the environment beyond those previously contemplated. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, and the project is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). 1263
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026 Agenda Item: 8E.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 5
Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommended Action(s):
..recommendation
Staff Recommendation
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT the City Council do the following:

1. Open the public hearing, receive and consider public comment, and close the public hearing; and

2. Introduce, and conduct the first reading, by title only, of Ordinance No. 1805 entitled AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING AMENDMENT (ZA) 26-066, TO AMEND SAN CLEMENTE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.50.010 RELATING TO URBAN LOT SPLITS, AND SECTION 17.86.010 RELATING TO TWO-UNIT PROJECTS, CONSISTENT WITH HOUSING ELEMENT COMMITMENT AND STATE LAW; AND FINDING THIS ACTION

EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE § 21083.3 AND CEQA GUIDELINES §§ 15183 and 15061(b)(3).
..end
Attachments:

1. Ordinance No. 1805
Exhibit A – Redline of Amendment to SCMC Chapter 16.50.010 – Urban Lot Splits Exhibit B – Redline of Amendment to SCMC Chapter 17.86.010 – Two-Unit Projects

2. Meeting Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of March 4, 2026

3. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC26-008

4. Public Hearing Notice
Notification:

Public notice for this item was published in the San Clemente Times, distributed and posted per City and State requirements.
1264
Attachment 1
4938-3449-0783 v2
ORDINANCE NO. 1805

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING
AMENDMENT (ZA) 26-066, TO AMEND SAN CLEMENTE
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.50.010 RELATING TO
URBAN LOT SPLITS, AND SECTION 17.86.010 RELATING

TO TWO-UNIT PROJECTS, CONSISTENT WITH
HOUSING ELEMENT COMMITMENT AND STATE LAW;

AND FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE § 21083.3 AND CEQA
GUIDELINES §§ 15183 and 15061(b)(3)
WHEREAS, on September, 16, 2021 the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill No. 9 (“SB 9”), which added Government Code sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to impose new limits on local authority to regulate urban lot splits and two-unit projects; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 66411.7 requires a local agency to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split that meets SB 9-specific requirements; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65852.21 requires a local agency to ministerially approve a proposed two residential units within a single-family zone, without discretionary review or a hearing, if the proposed two-unit projects meet all the requirements set forth in the statute; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council of the City of San Clemente (“City Council”) adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1723, to establish appropriate objective standards for urban lot splits and two-unit projects under SB 9; and WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1748, to amend the San Clemente Municipal Code (“SCMC”) to comply with Government Code Section 65852.21 and Section 66411.7, and appropriately regulate projects under SB 9; and WHEREAS, on September 19, 2024, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law, Senate Bill No. 450 (“SB 450”), which amended the abovereferenced Government Code sections to remove certain restrictions and requirements for developments under SB 9; and
WHEREAS, it is the City’s commitment to remove government constraints to the development of housing where feasible; and
WHEREAS, SCMC sections 16.50.010 and 17.86.010, which codify the City’s regulations with respect to urban lot splits and two-unit projects under SB 9, respectively, require amendments in order to comply with SB 9, as amended by SB 450; and 1265
Ordinance No. 1805 Page 2
4938-3449-0783 v2
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of San Clemente (“Planning Commission”) conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to consider the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the proposed Zoning Amendment 26-066. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward the Zoning Amendment to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing to be held to consider this Ordinance by advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation in compliance with state and local requirements; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance, considered the agenda report, including the policy considerations discussed therein, and the written and oral testimony received. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and the agenda report and other evidence that was considered by the Planning Commission, in connection with the proposed Zoning Amendment 26-066; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE DOES HEREBY DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2. CEQA Findings.

Based upon its review of the entire record, including the Staff Report, any public comments or testimony presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council, and the facts outlined below, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from CEQA and not subject to further environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15183 and 15061(b)(3). Since the project would adopt standards consistent with the land uses and development intensities analyzed in the certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Housing Element Update, and because and because the project would not introduce any new or peculiar, potentially significant environmental impacts, the SCMC amendments are eligible for the streamlined environmental review and exemption from CEQA pursuant to PRC Sec. 21083.3 and Guidelines Section 15183.

Additionally, the project is covered by the general rule that that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment, and where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, the project is not subject to CEQA. (Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).) The proposed zoning and subdivision municipal code 1266
Ordinance No. 1805 Page 3
4938-3449-0783 v2
amendments involve a policy action to align the City’s regulations with State law requirements related to implementation of the Housing Element and the removal of constraints on housing development. The amendments do not authorize or increase the intensity of development beyond what is already permitted under State law, but instead revise or eliminate local standards that are no longer enforceable. As such, the amendments do not result in any new development potential or physical changes to the environment beyond those previously contemplated. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, and the project is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 3. Zoning Amendment Findings. With respect to Zoning Amendment (ZA) 26-066, amending SCMC sections 16.50.010 and 17.86.010 as set forth in Exhibits A and B to this Ordinance, both of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, the City Council finds as follows, in accordance with SCMC section

17.16.040:

A. The proposed amendments are consistent with the General Plan.

1. The 6
th Cycle Housing Element is a component of the General Plan, including the Housing Action Plan objective to monitor the Zoning Ordinance for any potential constraints to the development of housing, including the City’s procedures for multi-family housing, and process amendments as necessary.

2. Program 14 of the Housing Action Plan of the City’s 6 th Cycle Housing Element
specifically mandates that the City address and remove governmental constraints affecting the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. This includes removing constraints for the development of two-unit projects.

B. The proposed amendments will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare.

1. The amendments meets community needs and conditions within the limitations set by State law.

2. The amendments reflect the City’s review, direction, and independent judgement regarding land use.

3. The amendments are consistent with the City’s 6
th Cycle Housing Element,
whereby the City Council determined that the implementation of the Housing Element Programs will not adversely impact the public health, safety, and welfare.

SECTION 4. Zoning Amendment 26-066. The City Council hereby approves Zoning Amendment (ZA) 26-066, to amend Sections 16.50.010 and 17.86.010 of the San Clemente Municipal Code as set forth in Exhibits A and B to this Ordinance, with deletions identified with strike-through text, and additions identified with underlined text (deletions/additions). Remaining text not shown with strike-through or underlined text shall remain unchanged.

SECTION 5: Records. The documents and materials associated with this Ordinance that constitute the record of proceedings on which the City Council's findings 1267
Ordinance No. 1805 Page 4
4938-3449-0783 v2
and determinations are based are located at City Hall, 910 Calle Negocio, San Clemente, CA 92673. The custodian of these records is the City Clerk.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any entity, person or circumstance is held for any reason to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption.

SECTION 8. Reference to Existing Provisions. All existing provisions of the Municipal Code that are repeated herein are repeated only to aid decision-makers and the public in understanding the effect of the proposed changes. Restatement of existing provisions does not constitute a new enactment.

SECTION 9. Certification and Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published as required by law.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , .

ATTEST:

City Clerk of the City Rick Loeffler, Mayor of the City of of San Clemente, California San Clemente, California
1268
Ordinance No. 1805 Page 5
4938-3449-0783 v2

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE )
I, LAURA CAMPAGNOLO, City Clerk of the City of San Clemente, California, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1805 having been regularly introduced at the meeting of , was again introduced, the reading in full thereof unanimously waived, and duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , , and said ordinance was
adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Clemente, California, this day of ,
.

CITY CLERK of the City of
San Clemente, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Elizabeth A. Mitchell, City Attorney
1269
Ordinance No. 1805 Page 6
4938-3449-0783 v2
Exhibit A
Zoning Amendment 26-066 – Amendments to SCMC Section 16.50.010 (Urban Lot Splits)
[Attached]
1270
(Supp. No. 61, Update 2)

Page 1 of 12 ends
← All documents from this meeting