Att. 4 - Hanson Hotel Project CEQA Section 15183 Exemption Report — San Clemente City Council, April 21, 2026 (part 2 of 4)

1.21927 1.02452 9.19052 9.69044 0.01582 0.41898 — 0.41898 0.38547 — 0.38547 — 1,714.25 1,714.25 0.06954 0.01391 — 1,720.14 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.38395 1.38395 — 0.66825 0.66825 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.15032 0.12631 1.13308 1.19471 0.00195 0.05166 — 0.05166 0.04752 — 0.04752 — 211.346 211.346 0.00857 0.00171 — 212.072 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.17062 0.17062 — 0.08239 0.08239 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.02743 0.02305 0.20679 0.21803 0.00036 0.00943 — 0.00943 0.00867 — 0.00867 — 34.9908 34.9908 0.00142 0.00028 — 35.1109 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03114 0.03114 — 0.01504 0.01504 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02596 0.02530 0.02282 0.39526 0.00000 0.00000 0.09803 0.09803 0.00000 0.02298 0.02298 — 97.6619 97.6619 0.00116 0.00355 0.33944 99.0897 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.26717 0.04117 3.25335 1.43834 0.01840 0.03504 0.71914 0.75418 0.03504 0.20168 0.23672 — 2,722.81 2,722.81 0.20673 0.43098 5.51160 2,861.92 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00318 0.00310 0.00323 0.04370 0.00000 0.00000 0.01208 0.01208 0.00000 0.00283 0.00283 — 11.6158 11.6158 0.00016 0.00044 0.01807 11.7686 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.03272 0.00486 0.41967 0.17798 0.00227 0.00432 0.08865 0.09297 0.00432 0.02486 0.02918 — 335.739 335.739 0.02549 0.05313 0.29312 352.504 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00058 0.00057 0.00059 0.00797 0.00000 0.00000 0.00221 0.00221 0.00000 0.00052 0.00052 — 1.92313 1.92313 0.00003 0.00007 0.00299 1.94842 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00597 0.00089 0.07659 0.03248 0.00041 0.00079 0.01618 0.01697 0.00079 0.00454 0.00533 — 55.5855 55.5855 0.00422 0.00880 0.04853 58.3610

3.3. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
20 / 79
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.58782 0.49393 4.80600 6.90565 0.01205 0.18874 — 0.18874 0.17364 — 0.17364 — 1,304.47 1,304.47 0.05291 0.01058 — 1,308.94 Onsite
truck

0.17600 0.14789 1.43898 2.06764 0.00361 0.05651 — 0.05651 0.05199 — 0.05199 — 390.574 390.574 0.01584 0.00317 — 391.914 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03212 0.02699 0.26261 0.37734 0.00066 0.01031 — 0.01031 0.00949 — 0.00949 — 64.6640 64.6640 0.00262 0.00052 — 64.8859 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
21 / 79
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10512 0.10244 0.09240 1.60053 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 395.463 395.463 0.00469 0.01440 1.37450 401.244 Vendor 0.02911 0.00789 0.37844 0.18943 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 371.713 371.713 0.01855 0.05246 0.96038 388.771 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10445 0.10244 0.10612 1.38059 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 376.362 376.362 0.00536 0.01440 0.03560 380.822 Vendor 0.02858 0.00737 0.39380 0.19361 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 371.896 371.896 0.01855 0.05246 0.02492 388.019 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03127 0.03047 0.03177 0.42970 0.00000 0.00000 0.11884 0.11884 0.00000 0.02786 0.02786 — 114.230 114.230 0.00160 0.00431 0.17766 115.732 Vendor 0.00864 0.00228 0.11872 0.05734 0.00080 0.00080 0.03036 0.03116 0.00080 0.00839 0.00919 — 111.319 111.319 0.00555 0.01571 0.12438 116.263 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00571 0.00556 0.00580 0.07842 0.00000 0.00000 0.02169 0.02169 0.00000 0.00508 0.00508 — 18.9121 18.9121 0.00027 0.00071 0.02941 19.1608 Vendor 0.00158 0.00042 0.02167 0.01047 0.00015 0.00015 0.00554 0.00569 0.00015 0.00153 0.00168 — 18.4301 18.4301 0.00092 0.00260 0.02059 19.2487 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.4. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
22 / 79
Off-Roa 0.58782 0.49393 4.80600 6.90565 0.01205 0.18874 — 0.18874 0.17364 — 0.17364 — 1,304.47 1,304.47 0.05291 0.01058 — 1,308.94 d
Onsite
truck

0.58782 0.49393 4.80600 6.90565 0.01205 0.18874 — 0.18874 0.17364 — 0.17364 — 1,304.47 1,304.47 0.05291 0.01058 — 1,308.94 Onsite
truck

0.17600 0.14789 1.43898 2.06764 0.00361 0.05651 — 0.05651 0.05199 — 0.05199 — 390.574 390.574 0.01584 0.00317 — 391.914 Onsite
truck

0.03212 0.02699 0.26261 0.37734 0.00066 0.01031 — 0.01031 0.00949 — 0.00949 — 64.6640 64.6640 0.00262 0.00052 — 64.8859 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10512 0.10244 0.09240 1.60053 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 395.463 395.463 0.00469 0.01440 1.37450 401.244 Vendor 0.02911 0.00789 0.37844 0.18943 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 371.713 371.713 0.01855 0.05246 0.96038 388.771 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
23 / 79
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10445 0.10244 0.10612 1.38059 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 376.362 376.362 0.00536 0.01440 0.03560 380.822 Vendor 0.02858 0.00737 0.39380 0.19361 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 371.896 371.896 0.01855 0.05246 0.02492 388.019 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03127 0.03047 0.03177 0.42970 0.00000 0.00000 0.11884 0.11884 0.00000 0.02786 0.02786 — 114.230 114.230 0.00160 0.00431 0.17766 115.732 Vendor 0.00864 0.00228 0.11872 0.05734 0.00080 0.00080 0.03036 0.03116 0.00080 0.00839 0.00919 — 111.319 111.319 0.00555 0.01571 0.12438 116.263 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00571 0.00556 0.00580 0.07842 0.00000 0.00000 0.02169 0.02169 0.00000 0.00508 0.00508 — 18.9121 18.9121 0.00027 0.00071 0.02941 19.1608 Vendor 0.00158 0.00042 0.02167 0.01047 0.00015 0.00015 0.00554 0.00569 0.00015 0.00153 0.00168 — 18.4301 18.4301 0.00092 0.00260 0.02059 19.2487 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.5. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.56653 0.47604 4.55564 6.89930 0.01205 0.16712 — 0.16712 0.15375 — 0.15375 — 1,304.35 1,304.35 0.05291 0.01058 — 1,308.83 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
24 / 79
Off-Roa
Equipment

0.56653 0.47604 4.55564 6.89930 0.01205 0.16712 — 0.16712 0.15375 — 0.15375 — 1,304.35 1,304.35 0.05291 0.01058 — 1,308.83 Onsite
truck

0.30267 0.25432 2.43383 3.68593 0.00644 0.08928 — 0.08928 0.08214 — 0.08214 — 696.845 696.845 0.02827 0.00565 — 699.237 Onsite
truck

0.05524 0.04641 0.44417 0.67268 0.00117 0.01629 — 0.01629 0.01499 — 0.01499 — 115.371 115.371 0.00468 0.00094 — 115.767 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10110 0.08671 0.09106 1.50178 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 388.805 388.805 0.00402 0.01440 1.23280 394.428 Vendor 0.02885 0.00763 0.36381 0.18065 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 364.843 364.843 0.01855 0.04980 0.87272 381.020 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10110 0.08604 0.09307 1.29154 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 370.034 370.034 0.00469 0.01440 0.03206 374.473 Vendor 0.02858 0.00737 0.37917 0.18483 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 365.035 365.035 0.01829 0.04980 0.02260 380.355 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
25 / 79
Worker 0.05365 0.04596 0.05598 0.71951 0.00000 0.00000 0.21205 0.21205 0.00000 0.04970 0.04970 — 200.389 200.389 0.00250 0.00769 0.28483 203.029 Vendor 0.01541 0.00408 0.20388 0.09749 0.00142 0.00142 0.05417 0.05559 0.00142 0.01497 0.01639 — 194.960 194.960 0.00977 0.02661 0.20096 203.333 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00979 0.00839 0.01022 0.13131 0.00000 0.00000 0.03870 0.03870 0.00000 0.00907 0.00907 — 33.1767 33.1767 0.00041 0.00127 0.04716 33.6137 Vendor 0.00281 0.00074 0.03721 0.01779 0.00026 0.00026 0.00989 0.01015 0.00026 0.00273 0.00299 — 32.2778 32.2778 0.00162 0.00440 0.03327 33.6641 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.6. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.56653 0.47604 4.55564 6.89930 0.01205 0.16712 — 0.16712 0.15375 — 0.15375 — 1,304.35 1,304.35 0.05291 0.01058 — 1,308.83 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
26 / 79
Off-Roa 0.30267 0.25432 2.43383 3.68593 0.00644 0.08928 — 0.08928 0.08214 — 0.08214 — 696.845 696.845 0.02827 0.00565 — 699.237 d
Onsite
truck

0.05524 0.04641 0.44417 0.67268 0.00117 0.01629 — 0.01629 0.01499 — 0.01499 — 115.371 115.371 0.00468 0.00094 — 115.767 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10110 0.08671 0.09106 1.50178 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 388.805 388.805 0.00402 0.01440 1.23280 394.428 Vendor 0.02885 0.00763 0.36381 0.18065 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 364.843 364.843 0.01855 0.04980 0.87272 381.020 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10110 0.08604 0.09307 1.29154 0.00000 0.00000 0.39696 0.39696 0.00000 0.09305 0.09305 — 370.034 370.034 0.00469 0.01440 0.03206 374.473 Vendor 0.02858 0.00737 0.37917 0.18483 0.00267 0.00267 0.10140 0.10406 0.00267 0.02802 0.03068 — 365.035 365.035 0.01829 0.04980 0.02260 380.355 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05365 0.04596 0.05598 0.71951 0.00000 0.00000 0.21205 0.21205 0.00000 0.04970 0.04970 — 200.389 200.389 0.00250 0.00769 0.28483 203.029 Vendor 0.01541 0.00408 0.20388 0.09749 0.00142 0.00142 0.05417 0.05559 0.00142 0.01497 0.01639 — 194.960 194.960 0.00977 0.02661 0.20096 203.333 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00979 0.00839 0.01022 0.13131 0.00000 0.00000 0.03870 0.03870 0.00000 0.00907 0.00907 — 33.1767 33.1767 0.00041 0.00127 0.04716 33.6137 Vendor 0.00281 0.00074 0.03721 0.01779 0.00026 0.00026 0.00989 0.01015 0.00026 0.00273 0.00299 — 32.2778 32.2778 0.00162 0.00440 0.03327 33.6641 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
27 / 79
Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.7. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.57535 0.48071 4.15212 5.30895 0.00857 0.16795 — 0.16795 0.15451 — 0.15451 — 823.016 823.016 0.03339 0.00668 — 825.840 Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.06778 0.05663 0.48915 0.62544 0.00101 0.01979 — 0.01979 0.01820 — 0.01820 — 96.9581 96.9581 0.00393 0.00079 — 97.2908 Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.01237 0.01034 0.08927 0.11414 0.00018 0.00361 — 0.00361 0.00332 — 0.00332 — 16.0525 16.0525 0.00065 0.00013 — 16.1076 Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
28 / 79
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05826 0.04958 0.05363 0.74423 0.00000 0.00000 0.22874 0.22874 0.00000 0.05362 0.05362 — 213.225 213.225 0.00270 0.00829 0.01847 215.783 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00682 0.00584 0.00711 0.09143 0.00000 0.00000 0.02694 0.02694 0.00000 0.00632 0.00632 — 25.4627 25.4627 0.00032 0.00098 0.03619 25.7981 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00124 0.00107 0.00130 0.01669 0.00000 0.00000 0.00492 0.00492 0.00000 0.00115 0.00115 — 4.21565 4.21565 0.00005 0.00016 0.00599 4.27117 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.8. Paving (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
29 / 79
Off-Roa
Equipment

0.01237 0.01034 0.08927 0.11414 0.00018 0.00361 — 0.00361 0.00332 — 0.00332 — 16.0525 16.0525 0.00065 0.00013 — 16.1076 Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05826 0.04958 0.05363 0.74423 0.00000 0.00000 0.22874 0.22874 0.00000 0.05362 0.05362 — 213.225 213.225 0.00270 0.00829 0.01847 215.783 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
30 / 79
Worker 0.00682 0.00584 0.00711 0.09143 0.00000 0.00000 0.02694 0.02694 0.00000 0.00632 0.00632 — 25.4627 25.4627 0.00032 0.00098 0.03619 25.7981 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00124 0.00107 0.00130 0.01669 0.00000 0.00000 0.00492 0.00492 0.00000 0.00115 0.00115 — 4.21565 4.21565 0.00005 0.00016 0.00599 4.27117 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.9. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13715 0.11335 0.83116 1.12539 0.00173 0.01905 — 0.01905 0.01752 — 0.01752 — 133.513 133.513 0.00542 0.00108 — 133.971 Architect
ural
Coating
s

3.20110 3.20110 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.13715 0.11335 0.83116 1.12539 0.00173 0.01905 — 0.01905 0.01752 — 0.01752 — 133.513 133.513 0.00542 0.00108 — 133.971 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
31 / 79
Architect 3.20110 3.20110 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural
Coating
Onsite
truck

0.03269 0.02702 0.19811 0.26824 0.00041 0.00454 — 0.00454 0.00418 — 0.00418 — 31.8236 31.8236 0.00129 0.00026 — 31.9328 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.76300 0.76300 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00597 0.00493 0.03616 0.04895 0.00008 0.00083 — 0.00083 0.00076 — 0.00076 — 5.26876 5.26876 0.00021 0.00004 — 5.28684 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.13925 0.13925 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02022 0.01734 0.01821 0.30036 0.00000 0.00000 0.07939 0.07939 0.00000 0.01861 0.01861 — 77.7611 77.7611 0.00080 0.00288 0.24656 78.8857 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
32 / 79
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.02022 0.01721 0.01861 0.25831 0.00000 0.00000 0.07939 0.07939 0.00000 0.01861 0.01861 — 74.0069 74.0069 0.00094 0.00288 0.00641 74.8947 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00479 0.00410 0.00500 0.06420 0.00000 0.00000 0.01892 0.01892 0.00000 0.00444 0.00444 — 17.8809 17.8809 0.00022 0.00069 0.02542 18.1164 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00087 0.00075 0.00091 0.01172 0.00000 0.00000 0.00345 0.00345 0.00000 0.00081 0.00081 — 2.96039 2.96039 0.00004 0.00011 0.00421 2.99938 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.10. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13715 0.11335 0.83116 1.12539 0.00173 0.01905 — 0.01905 0.01752 — 0.01752 — 133.513 133.513 0.00542 0.00108 — 133.971 Architect
ural
Coating
s

3.20110 3.20110 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
33 / 79
Onsite 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 truck
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13715 0.11335 0.83116 1.12539 0.00173 0.01905 — 0.01905 0.01752 — 0.01752 — 133.513 133.513 0.00542 0.00108 — 133.971 Architect
ural
Coating
s

3.20110 3.20110 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.03269 0.02702 0.19811 0.26824 0.00041 0.00454 — 0.00454 0.00418 — 0.00418 — 31.8236 31.8236 0.00129 0.00026 — 31.9328 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.76300 0.76300 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00597 0.00493 0.03616 0.04895 0.00008 0.00083 — 0.00083 0.00076 — 0.00076 — 5.26876 5.26876 0.00021 0.00004 — 5.28684 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.13925 0.13925 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
34 / 79
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02022 0.01734 0.01821 0.30036 0.00000 0.00000 0.07939 0.07939 0.00000 0.01861 0.01861 — 77.7611 77.7611 0.00080 0.00288 0.24656 78.8857 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02022 0.01721 0.01861 0.25831 0.00000 0.00000 0.07939 0.07939 0.00000 0.01861 0.01861 — 74.0069 74.0069 0.00094 0.00288 0.00641 74.8947 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00479 0.00410 0.00500 0.06420 0.00000 0.00000 0.01892 0.01892 0.00000 0.00444 0.00444 — 17.8809 17.8809 0.00022 0.00069 0.02542 18.1164 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00087 0.00075 0.00091 0.01172 0.00000 0.00000 0.00345 0.00345 0.00000 0.00081 0.00081 — 2.96039 2.96039 0.00004 0.00011 0.00421 2.99938 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
35 / 79
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 1.75243 1.57443 1.29419 15.5324 0.04300 0.02477 4.17415 4.19892 0.02309 1.05950 1.08258 — 4,390.75 4,390.75 0.17097 0.15660 13.8301 4,455.52 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

4.11640 3.69828 3.04000 36.4851 0.10101 0.05819 9.80493 9.86311 0.05423 2.48872 2.54295 — 10,313.7 10,313.7 0.40160 0.36784 32.4863 10,465.9 Total 5.86884 5.27271 4.33418 52.0175 0.14402 0.08296 13.9791 14.0620 0.07731 3.54821 3.62553 — 14,704.5 14,704.5 0.57256 0.52444 46.3164 14,921.4 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 1.74065 1.56121 1.40702 14.2476 0.04133 0.02478 4.17415 4.19893 0.02310 1.05950 1.08259 — 4,221.14 4,221.14 0.17654 0.16372 0.35859 4,274.70 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

4.08872 3.66723 3.30505 33.4670 0.09707 0.05821 9.80493 9.86314 0.05425 2.48872 2.54297 — 9,915.31 9,915.31 0.41469 0.38457 0.84232 10,041.1 Total 5.82937 5.22844 4.71207 47.7145 0.13840 0.08299 13.9791 14.0621 0.07735 3.54821 3.62556 — 14,136.4 14,136.4 0.59123 0.54830 1.20091 14,315.8 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.31580 0.28308 0.25986 2.67114 0.00762 0.00452 0.76168 0.76621 0.00421 0.19333 0.19755 — 706.431 706.431 0.02908 0.02722 0.98869 716.259 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.74181 0.66494 0.61040 6.27440 0.01791 0.01062 1.78917 1.79979 0.00990 0.45413 0.46403 — 1,659.38 1,659.38 0.06830 0.06395 2.32238 1,682.47 Total 1.05761 0.94802 0.87026 8.94554 0.02553 0.01514 2.55085 2.56600 0.01411 0.64747 0.66158 — 2,365.81 2,365.81 0.09738 0.09117 3.31107 2,398.73

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 1.75243 1.57443 1.29419 15.5324 0.04300 0.02477 4.17415 4.19892 0.02309 1.05950 1.08258 — 4,390.75 4,390.75 0.17097 0.15660 13.8301 4,455.52 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
37 / 79
High 4.08872 3.66723 3.30505 33.4670 0.09707 0.05821 9.80493 9.86314 0.05425 2.48872 2.54297 — 9,915.31 9,915.31 0.41469 0.38457 0.84232 10,041.1 Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
Total 5.82937 5.22844 4.71207 47.7145 0.13840 0.08299 13.9791 14.0621 0.07735 3.54821 3.62556 — 14,136.4 14,136.4 0.59123 0.54830 1.20091 14,315.8 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.31580 0.28308 0.25986 2.67114 0.00762 0.00452 0.76168 0.76621 0.00421 0.19333 0.19755 — 706.431 706.431 0.02908 0.02722 0.98869 716.259 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 41.0922 41.0922 0.03007 0.00364 — 42.9300 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 19.2820 19.2820 0.01411 0.00171 — 20.1444 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
38 / 79
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 7.59701 7.59701 0.00556 0.00067 — 7.93678 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 67.9713 67.9713 0.04974 0.00603 — 71.0112 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 41.0922 41.0922 0.03007 0.00364 — 42.9300 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 19.2820 19.2820 0.01411 0.00171 — 20.1444 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 7.59701 7.59701 0.00556 0.00067 — 7.93678 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 67.9713 67.9713 0.04974 0.00603 — 71.0112 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.80329 6.80329 0.00498 0.00060 — 7.10756 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 3.19236 3.19236 0.00234 0.00028 — 3.33513 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1.25777 1.25777 0.00092 0.00011 — 1.31402 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.2534 11.2534 0.00823 0.00100 — 11.7567

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
39 / 79
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 41.0922 41.0922 0.03007 0.00364 — 42.9300 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 19.2820 19.2820 0.01411 0.00171 — 20.1444 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 7.59701 7.59701 0.00556 0.00067 — 7.93678 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 67.9713 67.9713 0.04974 0.00603 — 71.0112 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 41.0922 41.0922 0.03007 0.00364 — 42.9300 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 19.2820 19.2820 0.01411 0.00171 — 20.1444 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 7.59701 7.59701 0.00556 0.00067 — 7.93678 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 67.9713 67.9713 0.04974 0.00603 — 71.0112 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.80329 6.80329 0.00498 0.00060 — 7.10756 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
40 / 79
Enclose — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.19236 3.19236 0.00234 0.00028 — 3.33513 d
Parking
with
Elevator
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1.25777 1.25777 0.00092 0.00011 — 1.31402 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.2534 11.2534 0.00823 0.00100 — 11.7567

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.03703 0.01852 0.33664 0.28278 0.00202 0.02558 — 0.02558 0.02558 — 0.02558 — 401.672 401.672 0.03555 0.00076 — 402.786 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

0.00573 0.00287 0.05211 0.04377 0.00031 0.00396 — 0.00396 0.00396 — 0.00396 — 62.1781 62.1781 0.00550 0.00012 — 62.3506 Total 0.04276 0.02138 0.38876 0.32655 0.00233 0.02955 — 0.02955 0.02955 — 0.02955 — 463.850 463.850 0.04105 0.00087 — 465.136 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.03703 0.01852 0.33664 0.28278 0.00202 0.02558 — 0.02558 0.02558 — 0.02558 — 401.672 401.672 0.03555 0.00076 — 402.786 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
41 / 79
Enclose 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 d
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

0.00573 0.00287 0.05211 0.04377 0.00031 0.00396 — 0.00396 0.00396 — 0.00396 — 62.1781 62.1781 0.00550 0.00012 — 62.3506 Total 0.04276 0.02138 0.38876 0.32655 0.00233 0.02955 — 0.02955 0.02955 — 0.02955 — 463.850 463.850 0.04105 0.00087 — 465.136 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.00676 0.00338 0.06144 0.05161 0.00037 0.00467 — 0.00467 0.00467 — 0.00467 — 66.5013 66.5013 0.00589 0.00013 — 66.6858 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

0.00105 0.00052 0.00951 0.00799 0.00006 0.00072 — 0.00072 0.00072 — 0.00072 — 10.2943 10.2943 0.00091 0.00002 — 10.3229 Total 0.00780 0.00390 0.07095 0.05960 0.00043 0.00539 — 0.00539 0.00539 — 0.00539 — 76.7956 76.7956 0.00680 0.00014 — 77.0086

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.03703 0.01852 0.33664 0.28278 0.00202 0.02558 — 0.02558 0.02558 — 0.02558 — 401.672 401.672 0.03555 0.00076 — 402.786 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
42 / 79
High 0.00573 0.00287 0.05211 0.04377 0.00031 0.00396 — 0.00396 0.00396 — 0.00396 — 62.1781 62.1781 0.00550 0.00012 — 62.3506 Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
Total 0.04276 0.02138 0.38876 0.32655 0.00233 0.02955 — 0.02955 0.02955 — 0.02955 — 463.850 463.850 0.04105 0.00087 — 465.136 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.03703 0.01852 0.33664 0.28278 0.00202 0.02558 — 0.02558 0.02558 — 0.02558 — 401.672 401.672 0.03555 0.00076 — 402.786 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

0.00573 0.00287 0.05211 0.04377 0.00031 0.00396 — 0.00396 0.00396 — 0.00396 — 62.1781 62.1781 0.00550 0.00012 — 62.3506 Total 0.04276 0.02138 0.38876 0.32655 0.00233 0.02955 — 0.02955 0.02955 — 0.02955 — 463.850 463.850 0.04105 0.00087 — 465.136 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel 0.00676 0.00338 0.06144 0.05161 0.00037 0.00467 — 0.00467 0.00467 — 0.00467 — 66.5013 66.5013 0.00589 0.00013 — 66.6858 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
43 / 79

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.64273 0.64273 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.07630 0.07630 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.55959 0.51643 0.02646 3.14480 0.00019 0.00559 — 0.00559 0.00422 — 0.00422 — 12.9322 12.9322 0.00054 0.00011 — 12.9789 Total 1.27862 1.23546 0.02646 3.14480 0.00019 0.00559 — 0.00559 0.00422 — 0.00422 — 12.9322 12.9322 0.00054 0.00011 — 12.9789 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.64273 0.64273 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.07630 0.07630 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 0.71903 0.71903 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.11730 0.11730 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
44 / 79
Architect
Coatings

0.01392 0.01392 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.06995 0.06455 0.00331 0.39310 0.00002 0.00070 — 0.00070 0.00053 — 0.00053 — 1.46649 1.46649 0.00006 0.00001 — 1.47178 Total 0.20117 0.19578 0.00331 0.39310 0.00002 0.00070 — 0.00070 0.00053 — 0.00053 — 1.46649 1.46649 0.00006 0.00001 — 1.47178

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.64273 0.64273 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.07630 0.07630 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.64273 0.64273 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
45 / 79
Architect 0.07630 0.07630 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural
Coating
Total 0.71903 0.71903 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.11730 0.11730 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.01392 0.01392 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 2.96513 1.31850 4.28363 0.30501 0.00734 — 14.0963 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00000 0.00850 0.00850 0.00001 <

0.000005
— 0.00888
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
46 / 79
High——————————— 1.00391 0.44490 1.44882 0.10327 0.00249— 4.77107 Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
Total——————————— 3.96905 1.77190 5.74095 0.40828 0.00983— 18.8763 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Hotel——————————— 2.96513 1.31850 4.28363 0.30501 0.00734— 14.0963 Enclose d
Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00000 0.00850 0.00850 0.00001<

0.000005
— 0.00888
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)—
—————————— 1.00391 0.44490 1.44882 0.10327 0.00249— 4.77107 Total——————————— 3.96905 1.77190 5.74095 0.40828 0.00983— 18.8763 Annual——————————————————
Hotel——————————— 0.49091 0.21829 0.70920 0.05050 0.00122— 2.33381 Enclose d
Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00000 0.00141 0.00141<

0.000005
<

0.000005
— 0.00147
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)—
—————————— 0.16621 0.07366 0.23987 0.01710 0.00041— 0.78990 Total——————————— 0.65712 0.29336 0.95048 0.06759 0.00163— 3.12518

4.4.2. Mitigated
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
47 / 79
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 2.96513 1.31850 4.28363 0.30501 0.00734 — 14.0963 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00000 0.00850 0.00850 0.00001 <

0.000005
— 0.00888
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.00391 0.44490 1.44882 0.10327 0.00249 — 4.77107 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.96905 1.77190 5.74095 0.40828 0.00983 — 18.8763 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 2.96513 1.31850 4.28363 0.30501 0.00734 — 14.0963 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00000 0.00850 0.00850 0.00001 <

0.000005
— 0.00888
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.00391 0.44490 1.44882 0.10327 0.00249 — 4.77107 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.96905 1.77190 5.74095 0.40828 0.00983 — 18.8763 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 0.49091 0.21829 0.70920 0.05050 0.00122 — 2.33381 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
48 / 79
< — 0.00147

0.000005
<

0.000005
Enclose — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00000 0.00141 0.00141
d
Parking
with
Elevator
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.16621 0.07366 0.23987 0.01710 0.00041 — 0.78990 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.65712 0.29336 0.95048 0.06759 0.00163 — 3.12518

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 17.9992 0.00000 17.9992 1.79896 0.00000 — 62.9731 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 11.0695 0.00000 11.0695 1.10635 0.00000 — 38.7283 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 29.0687 0.00000 29.0687 2.90531 0.00000 — 101.701 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
49 / 79
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 17.9992 0.00000 17.9992 1.79896 0.00000 — 62.9731 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 11.0695 0.00000 11.0695 1.10635 0.00000 — 38.7283 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 29.0687 0.00000 29.0687 2.90531 0.00000 — 101.701 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 2.97997 0.00000 2.97997 0.29784 0.00000 — 10.4259 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.83268 0.00000 1.83268 0.18317 0.00000 — 6.41192 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.81265 0.00000 4.81265 0.48101 0.00000 — 16.8378

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — 17.9992 0.00000 17.9992 1.79896 0.00000 — 62.9731 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
50 / 79
Enclose——————————— 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000— 0.00000 d
Parking
with
Elevator
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)—
—————————— 11.0695 0.00000 11.0695 1.10635 0.00000— 38.7283 Total——————————— 29.0687 0.00000 29.0687 2.90531 0.00000— 101.701 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Hotel——————————— 17.9992 0.00000 17.9992 1.79896 0.00000— 62.9731 Enclose d
Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000— 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)—
—————————— 11.0695 0.00000 11.0695 1.10635 0.00000— 38.7283 Total——————————— 29.0687 0.00000 29.0687 2.90531 0.00000— 101.701 Annual——————————————————
Hotel——————————— 2.97997 0.00000 2.97997 0.29784 0.00000— 10.4259 Enclose d
Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000— 0.00000 High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)—
—————————— 1.83268 0.00000 1.83268 0.18317 0.00000— 6.41192 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
51 / 79
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.81265 0.00000 4.81265 0.48101 0.00000 — 16.8378

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 44.2526 44.2526
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.69818 2.69818
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 46.9508 46.9508
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 44.2526 44.2526
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.69818 2.69818
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 46.9508 46.9508
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7.32652 7.32652
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.44671 0.44671
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
52 / 79
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7.77324 7.77324

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 44.2526 44.2526
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.69818 2.69818
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 46.9508 46.9508
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 44.2526 44.2526
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.69818 2.69818
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 46.9508 46.9508
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hotel — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7.32652 7.32652
High
Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.44671 0.44671
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7.77324 7.77324
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
53 / 79

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
54 / 79
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
55 / 79
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
56 / 79
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
57 / 79
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
58 / 79
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
59 / 79
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
60 / 79
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ered
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Grading Grading 6/1/2026 7/31/2026 5.00000 45.0000 —
Building Construction Building Construction 8/1/2026 9/30/2027 5.00000 304.000 — Paving Paving 10/1/2027 11/30/2027 5.00000 43.0000 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/1/2027 11/30/2027 5.00000 87.0000 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
61 / 79

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 148.000 0.41000 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 367.000 0.40000 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.000000 4.00000 367.000 0.29000 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00000 6.00000 82.0000 0.20000 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00000 6.00000 10.00000 0.56000
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 81.0000 0.42000 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 37.0000 0.48000

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 148.000 0.41000 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 367.000 0.40000 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.000000 4.00000 367.000 0.29000 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00000 6.00000 82.0000 0.20000 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 84.0000 0.37000
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
62 / 79
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00000 6.00000 10.00000 0.56000
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 81.0000 0.42000 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 37.0000 0.48000

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Grading Worker 7.50000 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 39.7333 20.0000 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction Worker 30.3698 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 11.8514 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving Worker 17.5000 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating Worker 6.07396 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
63 / 79
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Grading Worker 7.50000 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 39.7333 20.0000 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction Worker 30.3698 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 11.8514 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving Worker 17.5000 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating Worker 6.07396 18.5000 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2000 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00000 0.00000 45,051.0 15,017.0 —

5.6. Dust Mitigation
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
64 / 79

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic
Yards)
Material Exported (Cubic
Yards)
Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Grading — 14,300.0 33.7500 0.00000 0.00000
Paving 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Phase Name Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Paving Hotel 0.00000 0%
Paving Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00000 100%
Paving High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.00000 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2026 0.00000 588.983 0.03300 0.00400
2027 0.00000 588.983 0.03300 0.00400

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Hotel 487.024 487.024 487.024 177,764 5,898.90 5,898.90 5,898.90 2,153,100 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
65 / 79
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1,144.00 1,144.00 1,144.00 417,561 13,856.3 13,856.3 13,856.3 5,057,552

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Hotel 487.024 487.024 487.024 177,764 5,898.90 5,898.90 5,898.90 2,153,100 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1,144.00 1,144.00 1,144.00 417,561 13,856.3 13,856.3 13,856.3 5,057,552

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths
Land Use Hearth Type Unmitigated (number) Mitigated (number) Hotel Wood Fireplaces 0 0
Hotel Gas Fireplaces 0 0
Hotel Propane Fireplaces 0 0
Hotel Electric Fireplaces 0 0
Hotel No Fireplaces 0 0
Hotel Conventional Wood Stoves 0 0
Hotel Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0
Hotel Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0
Hotel Pellet Wood Stoves 0 0
Enclosed Parking with Elevator Wood Fireplaces 0 0
Enclosed Parking with Elevator Gas Fireplaces 0 0
Enclosed Parking with Elevator Propane Fireplaces 0 0
Enclosed Parking with Elevator Electric Fireplaces 0 0
Enclosed Parking with Elevator No Fireplaces 0 0
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
66 / 79
Enclosed Parking with Elevator Conventional Wood Stoves 0 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator Pellet Wood Stoves 0 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Wood Fireplaces 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Gas Fireplaces 0 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Propane Fireplaces 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Electric Fireplaces 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) No Fireplaces 0 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Conventional Wood Stoves 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Pellet Wood Stoves 0 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)

0.00000 0.00000 45,051.0 15,017.0 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00000
Summer Days day/yr 250.000

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00000
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
67 / 79
Summer Days day/yr 250.000

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Hotel 332,572 45.0990 0.0330 0.0040 1,253,323
Enclosed Parking with
Elevator
156,055 45.0990 0.0330 0.0040 0.00000
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
61,484.9 45.0990 0.0330 0.0040 194,012

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Hotel 332,572 45.0990 0.0330 0.0040 1,253,323
Enclosed Parking with
Elevator
156,055 45.0990 0.0330 0.0040 0.00000
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
61,484.9 45.0990 0.0330 0.0040 194,012

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Hotel 1,547,373 25,920.7
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00000 12,960.4
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 523,899 6,480.19
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
68 / 79

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Hotel 1,547,373 25,920.7
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00000 12,960.4
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 523,899 6,480.19

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Hotel 33.3975 0.00000
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00000 0.00000
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 20.5394 0.00000

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Hotel 33.3975 0.00000
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00000 0.00000
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 20.5394 0.00000

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Hotel Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430.00 0.00000 0.60000 0.00000 1.000000
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
69 / 79
Hotel Other commercial A/C R-410A 2,088.00 1.80000 4.00000 4.00000 18.0000 and heat pumps
Hotel Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922.00 0.00040 7.50000 7.50000 20.0000
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430.00 0.00000 0.60000 0.00000 1.000000
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088.00 1.80000 4.00000 4.00000 18.0000
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922.00 0.00040 7.50000 7.50000 20.0000

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Hotel Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430.00 0.00000 0.60000 0.00000 1.000000
Hotel Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088.00 1.80000 4.00000 4.00000 18.0000
Hotel Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922.00 0.00040 7.50000 7.50000 20.0000
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430.00 0.00000 0.60000 0.00000 1.000000
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088.00 1.80000 4.00000 4.00000 18.0000
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922.00 0.00040 7.50000 7.50000 20.0000

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
70 / 79

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
71 / 79

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 8.65000 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.10000 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00000 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 0 0 N/A
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
72 / 79
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 1 1 2
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
73 / 79

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 60.6596
AQ-PM 47.4300
AQ-DPM 81.2570
Drinking Water 35.0818
Lead Risk Housing 13.4846
Pesticides 0.00000
Toxic Releases 18.6047
Traffic 90.1625
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 58.1747
Groundwater 0.00000
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 2.51489
Impaired Water Bodies 77.2995
Solid Waste 79.9542
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 11.0793
Cardio-vascular 37.3006
Low Birth Weights 1.92456
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 13.1106
Housing 43.2826
Linguistic 13.3036
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
74 / 79
Poverty 20.3769
Unemployment 21.1088

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty —
Employed —
Median HI —
Education —
Bachelor's or higher —
High school enrollment —
Preschool enrollment —
Transportation —
Auto Access —
Active commuting —
Social —
2-parent households —
Voting —
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability —
Park access —
Retail density —
Supermarket access —
Tree canopy —
Housing —
Homeownership —
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
75 / 79
Housing habitability —
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden —
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden —
Uncrowded housing —
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults —
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 88.9
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 0.0
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 7.0
Heart Attack ER Admissions 85.1
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Pedestrian Injuries 0.0
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
76 / 79
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 73.3
Children 47.4
Elderly 2.0
English Speaking 0.0
Foreign-born 0.0
Outdoor Workers 75.6
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 35.3
Traffic Density 0.0
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 0.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 0.0

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 15.0000 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) —
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
77 / 79
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data

8.1. Justifications
Screen Justification
Land Use The proposed Hanson Hotel involves the development of a three-story, 61-room boutique hotel on a 32,030 square-foot (0.8 acre) vacant parcel. Conservatively 3,500 square feet of landscaping is added.

Construction: Construction Phases Based on the construction questionnaire Operations: Vehicle Data Based on the San Clemente 1801 N. El Camino Real - VMT Screening Assessment, dated February 2, 2025. High Turnover trips account for trips from both the Fine Dining and Café components of the project.

8.3. Land Use
Model Parameter Units Default Value New Value
Lot Area acre 2.03333 0.80000
Building Area sq. ft 88,572.0 28,308.0
Landscape Area sq. ft — 2,000.00
Lot Area acre 0.93600 0.00000
Building Area sq. ft 41,600.0 42,275.0
Landscape Area sq. ft — 1,000.000
Lot Area acre 0.03962 0.00000
Landscape Area sq. ft — 500.000
The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
78 / 79

8.4. Construction

8.4.1. Construction Phases
Phase Type Phase Name Model Parameter Default Value New Value Grading Grading Start Date 6/18/2026 6/1/2026
Grading Grading End Date 6/20/2026 7/31/2026
Grading Grading Work Days per Phase 2.00000 45.0000
Building Construction Building Construction Start Date 6/21/2026 8/1/2026 Building Construction Building Construction End Date 11/8/2026 9/30/2027 Building Construction Building Construction Work Days per Phase 100.0000 304.000 Paving Paving Start Date 11/9/2026 10/1/2027
Paving Paving End Date 11/16/2026 11/30/2027
Paving Paving Work Days per Phase 5.00000 43.0000
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating Start Date 11/17/2026 8/1/2027 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating End Date 11/24/2026 11/30/2027 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating Work Days per Phase 5.00000 87.0000

8.5. Operations

8.5.1. Mobile Sources

8.5.1.1. Vehicle Data
Land Use Model Parameter Units Default Value New Value
Hotel Weekday Trip Rate size/day 8.36000 7.98400
Hotel Saturday Trip Rate size/day 8.19000 7.98400
Hotel Sunday Trip Rate size/day 5.95000 7.98400
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Weekday Trip Rate size/day 112.180 662.805 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Saturday Trip Rate size/day 122.400 662.805 The Hansen Hotel Detailed Report, 2/24/2026
79 / 79
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Sunday Trip Rate size/day 142.640 662.805 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Weekday Primary Trip% 33.3500 100.0000 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Weekday Divert Trip% 23.6500 0.00000 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) Weekday Pass-By Trip% 43.0000 0.00000 Hanson Hotel Energy Calculations
Constrution On-Road (Mobile) Fuel Consumption
Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Worker Trips Worker Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day) Total Fuel Consumption (gallon) Grading 45 7.5 18.5 6,244 251
Building Construction 304 754.56486 18.5 4,243,673 170,409 Paving 43 17.5 18.5 13,921 559
Architectural Coating 87 150.912972 18.5 242,894 9,754
180,972.60
Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Vendor Trips Vendor Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day) Total Fuel Consumption (gallon) Grading 45 0 10.2 0 0
Building Construction 304 13.04 10.2 40,434 4,846
Paving 43 0 10.2 0 0
Architectural Coating 87 0 10.2 0 0
4,846.00
Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Hauling Trips Hauling Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day)1 Total Fuel Consumption (gallon)
Grading 45 39.733 20 35,760 4,286
Building Construction 304 0 20 0 0
Paving 43 0 20 0 0
Architectural Coating 87 0 20 0 0
4,285.77
190,104.37
1,056,094,532

0.0180%
Total Construction On-Road (Mobile) Fuel Consumption (gallon)

WORKER TRIPS

VENDOR TRIPS

HAULING TRIPS

24.90284233

8.343886151

8.343886151
Hauling Trips Total
Vendor Trips Total
Worker Trips Total
Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Notes:

1. Countywide operational fuel consumption, off-road construction equipment diesel fuel consumption, and on-road fuel consumption are from CARB's EMFAC2021.

Percentage Increase Countywide
Countywide On-Road (Mobile) Fuel Consumption (2026) (gallon) 1 Hanson Hotel Energy Calculations
Construction Off-Road (Equipment) Fuel Consumption
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage
Hours
Horse
Power
Load
Factor
Fuel Consumption
Rate (gallon/hour)1
Duration (total
hours/day) # days Total Fuel Consumption (gallon)
Grading Graders 1 6 148 0.41 2.43 6 44 640.78
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6 367 0.4 5.87 6 44 1,550.21 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 84 0.37 1.24 7 44 382.91 Building Construction Cranes 1 4 367 0.29 4.26 4 88 1,498.53 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6 82 0.2 0.66 12 88 692.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 84 0.37 1.24 16 88 1,750.43 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 84 0.37 1.24 7 88 765.81 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6 10 0.56 0.22 24 242 1,300.99 Paving Pavers 1 7 81 0.42 1.36 7 242 2,305.20
Paving Rollers 1 7 36 0.38 0.55 7 242 926.96
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 37 0.48 0.71 6 242 1,031.50 12,846.05
18,350,502.68

0.0700%
Where:

Fuel Consumption Factor for a diesel engine is 0.04 gallons per horsepower per hour (gal/hp/hr) and a gasoline engine is 0.06 gal/hp/hr.

Total Construction Off-Road Fuel Consumption (gallon)
Notes:

1. Fuel Consumption Rate = Horsepower x Load Factor x Fuel Consumption Factor Countywide Off-Road Fuel Consumption (2026) (gallon) 2
Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Percentage Increase Countywide

2. Countywide operational fuel consumption, off-road construction equipment diesel fuel consumption, and on-road fuel consumption are from CARB's OFFROAD2021 (v1.0.5) Emissions Inventory.

Hanson Hotel Energy Calculations
Operation On-Road (Mobile) Fuel Consumption
Vehicle Type Percent of Vehicle Trips1 Daily Trips2 Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled
Average Fuel Economy
(miles per gallon)3 Total Annual Fuel Consumption (gallon)4 Passenger Cars 0.49 807 3,567,027 22 162,138
Light/Medium Trucks 0.48 781 3,450,759 17.3 199,466
Heavy Trucks/Other 0.03 44 193,372 6.4 30,214
Total 1.00 1,631 7,211,158 -- 391,818
391,818
1,012,273,716

0.0387%
Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Notes:

1. Percent of Vehicle Trip distribution based on trip characteristics within the CalEEMod model.

2. Daily Trips taken from Traffic Study

3. Average fuel economy derived from the Department of Transportation.

Total Operational On-Road (Mobile) Fuel Consumption (gallon)

4. Total Daily Fuel Consumption calculated by dividing the daily VMT by the average fuel economy (i.e., VMT/Average Fuel Economy).

5. Countywide operational fuel consumption, off-road construction equipment diesel fuel consumption, and on-road fuel consumption are from CARB's EMFAC2021.

Countywide On-Road Fuel Consumption (2027) (gallon) 5
Percentage Increase Countywide
Hanson Hotel Energy Calculations
Operational Electricty and Natural Gas Usage
(kWh/yr) (MWh/yr) (kBTU/yr) (Therms/yr)
Hotel 332,572 333 1,253,323 12,533
Enclosed Parking with 156,055 156 0 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 61,485 61 194,012 1,940 Total 550,112 550 1,447,335 14,473
Project Annual Energy Consumption Orange County Annual Energy Consumption (2024)1,2 Percentage Increase Countywide
550 19,225,145 0.0029%
14,473 338,651,335 0.0043%
Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

1. County annual electricity consumption data source: California Energy Commission, Electricity Consumption, https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/california-energy-consumption-dashboards-0

2. County annual natural gas consumption data source: California Energy Commission, Natural Gas Consumption , https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/california-energy-consumption-dashboards-1 Land Use
Natural Gas (therms)
Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Energy Type
Notes:

Electricity Use Natural Gas Use
Electricity (MWh)

APPENDIX C
Biological Resources Assessment
This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707
Office: 949-472-3505 | Fax: 949-472-8373
March 12, 2026 JN 210935

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
John Ciampa, Contract Planner
910 Calle Negocio
San Clemente, CA 92673
SUBJECT: Biological Resources Assessment for the Hanson Hotel Project in San Clemente, Orange County, California
Dear John Ciampa,
Michael Baker International is pleased to submit this technical letter report documenting the results of a biological resources assessment for the proposed Hanson Hotel project (Project) located in San Clemente, Orange County, California. The Project proposes to develop the subject property into a hotel. This report is intended to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15183: “Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning” and Measure 5.3-1 of the City of San Clemente’s Centennial General Plan Environmental Impact Report (General Plan EIR), which partially states that:

The City of San Clemente shall require applicants for public and private development projects that disturb vacant land to prepare a biological resources survey. The biological resources survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist and submitted to the City’s Planning Department. The biological resources survey shall include, but not be limited to:

Analysis of available literature and biological databases, such as the California Natural Diversity Database, to determine sensitive biological resources that have been reported historically from the proposed development project vicinity; review of current land use and land ownership within the proposed development project vicinity; Assessment and mapping of vegetation communities present within the proposed development project vicinity; and general assessment of potential jurisdictional areas, including wetlands and riparian habitats.

1.0 PROJECT LOCATION
The approximately 0.74-acre Project site is located at 1801 North El Camino Real, San Clemente, California, 92672 (Attachment A, Figure 1, Regional Vicinity and Figure 2, Survey Area). The Project site is north and east of North El Camino Real, west of East Avenida Pico, and south of Pico Park and is within Section 32, Township 08 South, Range 07 West of the Dana Point 7.5- minute United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map. The Project site is located within the boundaries of the Orange County Southern Subregion Habitat Conservation Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 2
Plan (HCP) but is not within the Southern Reserve or in an area designated as Supplemental Open Space.

2.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The Project site is located in the City of San Clemente less than 500 feet from the beach. The Project site is disturbed but undeveloped and is adjacent to major roadways to the east and south, a mostly-covered concrete channel to the north, and a commercial building to the west. The greater survey area to the north and west consists primarily of undeveloped open space associated with the Sea Summit Trails system. Elevations within the Project site range from approximately 25 feet above mean sea level in the center of the site to 35 feet above mean sea level along its eastern edge, running alongside Avenida Pico. Vegetation on-site is periodically mowed and mostly cleared and exhibited different stages of growth over time during various field surveys conducted for this project. Refer to Attachment B for representative photographs taken throughout the Project site.

The Web Soil Survey shows that the survey area supports six soil types (Attachment A, Figure 3, USDA Soils Map):
• 100: Alo clay, 9-15 percent slopes
• 102: Alo clay, 30-50 percent slopes, warm MAAT, MLRA 20 • 115: Beaches
• 134: Calleguas clay loam, 50-75 percent slopes, eroded • 177: Myford sandy loam, 9-30 percent slopes, eroded
• 209: Sorrento clay loam, 2-9 percent slopes, warm MAAT, MLRA 19

3.0 METHODS

3.1 Literature Review
Prior to conducting the field survey, Michael Baker conducted a thorough literature review and records search to characterize existing site conditions and assess the potential for special-status1 biological resources to occur that might pose a constraint to Project implementation. A query of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CNDDB 2026) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (CNPS 2026) was conducted to obtain a list of special-status plant and wildlife species occurrence records within the US Geological Survey (USGS) Dana Point and San Clemente, California 7.5-minute quadrangle maps. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) IPaC online database was also reviewed to identify special-status species and other resources, such as Critical Habitat, known or expected to occur on the Project site or within the immediate vicinity (USFWS 2026a). Due to the results listed in the IPaC report, the USFWS Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species mapping tool (USFWS 2026b) was accessed to determine the location of designated 1 Special-status refers to plant and wildlife species that are federal or state-listed, proposed, or candidates; plant species that have been designated a California Rare Plant Rank 1, 2, or 4 by the California Native Plant Society; wildlife species that are designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife as Fully Protected, or Species of Special Concern; and other state or locally rare vegetation communities.

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 3
Critical Habitat in relation to the Project site. Other sources of information about the Project site and surrounding area include the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2026) and the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS 2026c). All the information obtained informed our understanding of the Project site and assisted with the field survey and subsequent analysis. The results presented in this report provide a detailed assessment of the suitability of the habitat on-site to support special-status plant and wildlife species and other sensitive natural resources.

3.2 Habitat Assessment/Field Survey
The Project site was previously visited by Michael Baker biologist Ryan Winkleman on April 2, 2025 to evaluate general biological resources and determine if the proposed development met the criteria for a Class 32 CEQA exemption. Due to access restrictions, the site was only viewable from the public right-of-way (sidewalk) during the April survey and was not directly entered.

Michael Baker biologists Ryan Winkleman and Trina Ming conducted a second field survey of the Project site on September 25, 2025 in response to a public comment letter disputing the April 2025 survey findings, during which direct access onto the site was obtained. Mr. Winkleman and Ms. Ming conducted a third and final field survey on December 8, 2025 to assess biological resources in the immediate Project vicinity, as required by MMP Measure 3-1. The area evaluated in December 2025 included the Project site and a 300-foot buffer (survey area), but it should be noted that due to right-of-access issues, the buffer outside of the Project site could not be directly accessed and was instead evaluated from the public right-of-way including adjacent sidewalks and the fenceline of Pico Park, from trails within the adjacent Sea Summit, and from within the Project site.

During all three field surveys, Michael Baker biologists evaluated vegetation communities and land covers based on the descriptions of terrestrial vegetation classification systems described in A Manual of California Vegetation (Sawyer et al. 2009). In addition, site characteristics such as soil condition, topography, hydrology, anthropogenic disturbances, indicator species, condition of on-site vegetation communities, and the presence of potentially regulated jurisdictional features were noted. A formal aquatic resources delineation was not conducted during any of the three site visits. Michael Baker used geographic information systems (GIS) software to digitize the mapped vegetation communities and overlayed the data onto an aerial photograph to further analyze existing conditions and quantify the acreages of each vegetation community on-site.

All plant and wildlife species detected during the field surveys were recorded in field notebooks.

Plant species observed were identified by visual characteristics and morphology in the field while unusual and less familiar plant species were photographed and later identified using taxonomic guides. Plant species nomenclature and taxonomy follow The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition (Baldwin et al. 2012) and scientific names are provided immediately following common names of plant species (first reference only). Wildlife detections were made through aural and visual detection, as well as observation of sign including scat, trails, tracks, burrows, and nests. Field guides used to assist with identification of species during the field survey included The Sibley Guide to Birds (Sibley 2014) for birds, A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians (Stebbins 2003) for herpetofauna, and A Field Guide to Mammals of North America (Reid 2006) for mammals. Wildlife species taxonomy follows the North American Butterfly Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 4
Association (NABA, NABA 2024) for butterflies, the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (Nicholson 2025) for herpetofauna, the American Ornithological Society for birds (Chesser et al. 2023), and Wilson and Reeder (2005) for mammals. Scientific names are provided immediately following common names of wildlife species (first reference only).

The potential for special-status species to occur in the survey area was evaluated based on each species' known geographic distribution and elevation range; species-specific habitat requirements (e.g., vegetation communities/land covers, soils, hydrology, slope/aspect, and other requirements); life history traits (e.g., disturbance tolerance); and Michael Baker biologists’ expertise, knowledge, and best professional judgement. Current and historic records of species identified during the literature review were also considered during the analysis; however, a species' potential to occur determination was not solely based on the age or location of these previously documented records. The potential to occur categories used in this analysis are defined as follows:
• Present: The species was observed or detected within the study area during 2025 surveys. • Expected: The study area is within the known geographic distribution and elevation range of the species, there is high quality suitable habitat (considering vegetation, soils, and other factors) is present, and there is viable landscape connectivity to a local, known extant population(s) or sighting(s) within the study area.
• Moderate: The study area is within the known geographic distribution and elevation range of the species, there is moderate to low quality suitable habitat (considering vegetation, soils, and other factors), and there is limited or no landscape connectivity to a local, known, extant population.
• Not Expected: The study area is outside the known geographic distribution and elevation range of the species, there is marginal to no suitable habitat, and there is no connectivity to known, extant populations.
• Absent: The species was not detected during focused or agency-approved protocol surveys.

4.0 RESULTS
The Project site was previously visited by Michael Baker biologists on April 2 and September 25, 2025 Michael Baker biologists Ryan Winkleman and Trina Ming conducted a third survey on December 8, 2025 between 0923 and 1056 hours to document current and existing conditions within the Project site and the 300-foot buffer. Weather conditions during the final survey were sunny with temperatures ranging from 62 to 74 degrees Fahrenheit with wind speeds ranging from 0 to 1 miles per hour.

4.1 Vegetation Communities and Land Covers
The survey area supports the following vegetation communities and land cover types: California sagebrush - (purple sage) scrub, disturbed California sagebrush - (purple sage) scrub, coyote brush scrub, disturbed coast prickly pear scrub, disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub, quailbush scrub, disturbed quailbush scrub, disturbed, and developed land as summarized in Table 1, Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 5
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types, and depicted in Attachment A, Figure 4, Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types.

TABLE 1. VEGETATION COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER TYPES
Vegetation Community/Land Cover Project Site
(Acres)
Survey Area
(Acres)
California sagebrush - (purple sage) scrub - 1.16
Disturbed California sagebrush - (purple
sage) scrub - 0.24
Coyote brush scrub - 0.83
Disturbed coast prickly pear scrub - 0.41
Disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub 0.36 -
Quailbush scrub 0.14 -
Disturbed quailbush scrub - 0.30
Disturbed 0.25 0.45
Developed - 7.97
TOTAL 0.75* 11.36
*This total is slightly higher than the official acreage due to rounding.

California Sagebrush - (Purple Sage) Scrub
The California sagebrush - (purple sage) scrub (Artemisia californica – [Salvia leucophylla] shrubland alliance, Artemisia californica association) vegetation community was located within the western portion of the survey area. This vegetation community consisted of a mixture of California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), big saltbush (Atriplex lentiformis), coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis), and lemonade berry (Rhus integrifolia).

Disturbed California Sagebrush - (Purple Sage) Scrub
The disturbed California sagebrush - (purple sage) scrub (Disturbed Artemisia californica – [Salvia leucophylla] shrubland alliance, Artemisia californica association) vegetation community was located within the western portion of the survey area. This vegetation community consisted of a mixture of native shrub species including California sagebrush, big saltbush, bush sunflower (Encelia californica), box-thorn (Lycium sp.), coastal goldenbush (Isocoma menziesii), coast prickly pear (Opuntia littoralis), coast cholla (Cylindropuntia prolifera), and California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum). Portions of this vegetation community were disturbed, consisting of non-native coppery mesemb (Malephora crocea) and bare areas.

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 6
Coyote Brush Scrub
The coyote brush scrub (Baccharis pilularis shrubland alliance, Baccharis pilularis association) vegetation community was present in the northern section of the survey area. This vegetation community was dominated by coyote brush with other native shrubs in lower quantities including big saltbush, coast goldenbush, mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia), California sagebrush, and coast cholla.

Disturbed Coast Prickly Pear Scrub
The disturbed coast prickly pear scrub (disturbed Opuntia littoralis - Opuntia oricola - Cylindropuntia prolifera shrubland alliance, Cylindropuntia prolifera - mixed coastal scrub association) vegetation community was located within the central portion of the survey area.

Dominant vegetation coverage in this community consisted of coast cholla with other native shrubs present including big saltbush, bush sunflower, California sagebrush, box-thorn, and coast prickly pear. Portions of the vegetation community consisted of non-native coppery mesemb and bare ground with disturbance noted on the eastern edge of this vegetation community. This vegetation community is designated as a sensitive community by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), but it does not have a specific sensitivity ranking.

Disturbed Menzies’s Golden Bush Scrub
The disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub (Disturbed Isocoma menziesii shrubland alliance, Isocoma menziesii association) vegetation community was located within the Project site. This area was previously maintained and has since revegetated primarily with coastal goldenbush and coyote brush providing a high component of native cover. Additional species noted include small individuals of big saltbush and stinkwort (Dittrichia graveolens). A large component of this vegetation community consisted of bare ground and trash present surrounding native shrubs. This vegetation community is designated as a sensitive “S3” community by the CDFW, indicating that mitigation for its loss may be necessary.

Quailbush Scrub
The quailbush scrub (Atriplex lentiformis shrubland alliance, Atriplex lentiformis association) vegetation community was located within the Project site along the northern and eastern edges.

Predominant vegetation coverage consisted of big saltbush with a smaller quantity of coyote brush. Native thatch was present between native shrubs.

Disturbed Quailbush Scrub
The disturbed quailbush scrub (disturbed Atriplex lentiformis shrubland alliance, Atriplex lentiformis association) vegetation community was located in the central portion of the survey area. A majority of the land cover within this vegetation community consisted of bare ground intermixed with scattered big saltbush, coyote brush, and coast goldenbush shrubs.

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 7
Disturbed
The disturbed land was present in the southwest corner of the Project site as well as in an open lot in the southwest section of the survey area.

Developed
The developed land cover was present throughout the survey area and was associated with commercial development, North El Camino Real, East Avenida Pico, and a concreted portion of Segunda Deshecha Cañada.

4.2 General Floral Inventory
A total of 25 species of native or naturalized plants, 18 native (72 percent) and 7 non-native (28 percent), were recorded on-site. Attachment C, Species Compendiums, contains a list of observed plant species.

4.3 General Wildlife Inventory
Atotal of 23 wildlife species, all birds, were observed during the field survey, 21 native (91 percent) and 2 non-native (9 percent). The most commonly occurring birds during the two field surveys included yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronata), white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), and house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus). Attachment C, Species Compendiums, contains a list of detected wildlife species.

4.4 Special-Status Biological Resources
Sensitive Natural Communities
Seven natural communities considered sensitive by the CDFW were reported in the CNDDB from the two USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map region. These include:
• Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest
• Southern Coastal Salt Marsh
• Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Forest
• Southern Dune Scrub
• Southern Foredunes
• Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland
• Valley Needlegrass Grassland
None of these sensitive vegetation communities are present on-site or in the surrounding survey area. However, the Project site does contain one sensitive vegetation community, disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub. This community has an “S3” designation under the CDFW, indicating that impacts or its loss may require compensatory mitigation (CDFW 2025).

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 8
Special-Status Plant Species
A total of 49 special-status plant species were reported in the CNDDB and CNPS Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California from the USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map region including the Dana Point and San Clemente maps and in the vicinity by IPaC. After a review of specific habitat preferences, known distributions, and elevation ranges, 17 special-status plant species have the potential to occur within the buffer area only due to the presence of suitable habitat including aphanisma (Aphanisma blitoides), Coulter's saltbush (Atriplex coulteri), south coast saltscale (Atriplex pacifica), Orcutt's pincushion (Chaenactis glabriuscula var. orcuttiana), seaside cistanthe (Cistanthe maritima), Blochman's dudleya (Dudleya blochmaniae ssp. blochmaniae), many-stemmed dudleya (Dudleya multicaulis), cliff spurge (Euphorbia misera), decumbent goldenbush (Isocoma menziesii var. decumbens), Robinson's pepper-grass (Lepidium virginicum var. robinsonii), woolly-headed lessingia (Lessingia hololeuca), California box-thorn (Lycium californicum), cliff malacothrix (Malacothrix saxatilis var. saxatilis), south coast branching phacelia (Phacelia ramosissima var. austrolitoralis), white rabbit-tobacco (Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum), Nuttall's scrub oak (Quercus dumosa), and chaparral ragwort (Senecio aphanactis). No special-status plant species have the potential to occur within the project site due to a lack of suitable habitat. Attachments D, E, and F contain the plant-related literature review results.

Special-Status Wildlife Species
A total of 31 special-status wildlife species were reported in the CNDDB from the two USGS 7.5- minute quadrangle map region and in the vicinity by IPaC. Two special-status wildlife species were observed during the field surveys and are considered present: coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica; federal threatened and California species of special concern [SSC]) was observed within the Project site during the September 2025 survey and within the survey buffer during the December 2025 survey and a northern harrier (Circus hudsonius; California SSC) was observed just outside the survey area during the December 2025 survey.

Additional special-status wildlife species that have a moderate potential to occur include Crotch’s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii; California Candidate endangered), which may forage on the Project site but would not be expected to nest due to long-term disturbance and lack of suitable soil substrate, as well as red-diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber; California SSC) and coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum; California SSC) within the survey buffer where habitat is more intact and less disturbed but likely not within the Project site itself. Remaining special-status wildlife species from the literature review are not expected to occur in the Project site or survey area due to a lack of suitable habitat and a review of specific habitat preferences, known distributions, and elevation ranges. Attachments D and F contain the wildlife-related literature review results.

Critical Habitat
Under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA), Critical Habitat may be established for species listed as threatened or endangered. Critical Habitat refers to specific areas within the geographical Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 9
range of a species that were occupied at the time it was listed that contain the physical or biological features that are essential to the survival and eventual recovery of that species and that may require special management considerations or protection, regardless of whether the species is still extant in the area. Areas that were not known to be occupied at the time a species was listed can also be designated Critical Habitat if they contain one or more of the physical or biological features that are essential to that species’ conservation and if the other areas that are occupied are inadequate to ensure the species’ recovery.

In the event that a project may result in take or adverse modification to a listed species’ designated Critical Habitat, a project proponent may be required to engage in suitable mitigation. However, consultation for impacts to Critical Habitat is only required when a project has a federal nexus.

This may include projects that occur on federal lands, require federal permits (e.g., Clean Water Act [CWA] Section 404 permit), or receive any federal oversight or funding. If there is a federal nexus, then the federal agency that is responsible for providing funds or permits would be required to consult with the USFWS under the ESA.

The survey area is not located within any designated Critical Habitat.

State and Federal Jurisdictional Aquatic Features
Four key agencies regulate activities within coastal streams, wetlands, and riparian areas in California. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Regulatory Branch regulates activities that result in the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the US, including wetlands, pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Of the state agencies, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulates discharges to waters of the State, including wetlands, pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA, Section 13263 of the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State; the CDFW regulates alterations to lakes, streambeds, and associated riparian habitat pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. of the CFGC; and the California Coastal Commission (CCC) regulates land use in the coastal zone pursuant to the California Coastal Act (CCA).

Based on a review of aerial photographs, USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps, USFWS National Wetland Inventory maps, and observations made during the field survey, there are no jurisdictional drainage features within the Project site. The Segunda Deshecha Cañada Channel flows immediately north of the Project site, out of the hills and out onto the beach into the Pacific Ocean.

Adjacent to the Project it is mostly undergrounded within a concrete box channel, with only the part of it adjacent to the Project’s northeastern corner uncovered and open. However, it is located entirely outside of the Project site and is the only jurisdictional drainage feature within the survey area.

There are no drainage features within the Project site, which is in turn fenced on all sides. Direct impacts to drainage features are not expected to occur and a formal aquatic resources delineation is not recommended.

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 10

4.5 Wildlife Corridors and Habitat Linkages
Wildlife corridors link areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated by areas of nonsuitable habitat such as rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. Wildlife corridors are essential to the regional ecology of a species because they provide avenues of genetic exchange and allow animals to access alternative territories as dictated by fluctuating population densities. Fragmentation of open space areas by urbanization creates “islands” of wildlife habitat that are more or less isolated from each other. Corridors mitigate the effects of this fragmentation by (1) allowing animals to move between remaining habitats, thereby permitting depleted populations to be replenished and promoting genetic exchange; (2) providing escape routes from fire, predators, and human disturbances, thus reducing the risk of catastrophic events (such as fire or disease) that could lead to local extinction; and (3) serving as travel routes for individual animals as they move within their home ranges in search of food, water, mates, and shelter. Wildlife corridors are usually bounded by urban land areas or other areas unsuitable for wildlife. The corridor generally contains suitable cover, food, and/or water to support species and facilitate movement while in the corridor. Larger, landscape-level corridors (often referred to as “habitat or landscape linkages”) can provide both transitory and resident habitat for a variety of species. Although it is commonly used as a synonym for wildlife corridor, a habitat linkage refers to a more substantial, or wider, land connection between two habitat areas. Habitat linkages allow for the periodic exchange of animals between habitat areas, which is essential to maintain adequate gene pools.

The Project site is adjacent to the Sea Summit Trails area in San Clemente, California, approximately 500 feet from the beach. It is completely in uplands and is surrounded on all sides by a chain-link fence. Although the Project site may allow local movement by bird species, because of the chain-link fence it provides no connectivity for large mammal species to any biological resources or open space areas in the local or regional vicinity and does not serve as either a habitat linkage or wildlife corridor.

5.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion examines the impacts to biological resources that may occur as a result of the proposed project. The determination of impacts is based on both the features of the proposed project and the biological values of the habitat and sensitivity of plant and wildlife species potentially affected.

Impacts to biological resources are assessed using impact significance threshold criteria, which mirror the policy statement contained in the CEQA, Section 21001(c) of the California Public Resources Code. The questions below model those included in the checklist of questions listed in Appendix G of the CEQA guidelines and that are considered to determine if the project would have significant impacts to biological resources.

The analysis in this document is written in such a way that it analyzes the proposed Project’s impacts in relation to what was already analyzed and approved in the City of San Clemente’s Centennial General Plan EIR. If the General Plan EIR already analyzed an impact and the Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 11
proposed Project does not contain additional significant impacts that exceed what was already approved, the Project is considered consistent with the General Plan EIR.

5.1 Impacts to Special-Status Species
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Previous Significance Determination:

The City is geographically located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Orange County Southern Subregion Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), which provides coverage for 32 plant and animal species, seven of which receive protection under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA).

Proposed changes in land use and land use intensity as part of General Plan implementation would be located predominantly in eight “Focus Areas” centered around Interstate 5 (I-5) and within the Rancho San Clementa neighborhood. Each Focus Area would experience a change in intensity and/or permitted use, as assigned by the General Plan, unique to its location within the City. The General Plan EIR found that development in accordance with proposed land use changes could allow for the introduction of development into currently undeveloped sites, resulting in loss of native vegetation and habitats that support sensitive species. Such land use changes that could impact biological resources would predominantly occur within six of the eight Focus Areas (excluding the Pier Bowl and South El Camino Real East of the I-5 Focus Areas), as well as at the Shorecliffs Golf Course and within designated open space within the City. Impacts to species could occur directly from habitat modification and removal and indirectly through increases in noise, light and glare, and altered drainage patterns.

According to the General Plan EIR, the Focus Areas lack natural habitat, and as such it was determined that changing the land use designations within the Focus Areas would not directly impact any sensitive species. However, sensitive species such as the California gnatcatcher can occur in coastal scrub habitats on hillsides that adjoin Focus Areas. Construction activities in these areas that adjoin habitat occupied by the California gnatcatcher could adversely impact this sensitive species as a result of disturbance during the nesting season. As such, the General Plan EIR included Mitigation Measure 5.3-1 to require that applicants of future development projects that disturb undeveloped land prepare a biological resources survey, which, depending on the results of the survey, could include: a focused habitat assessment, focused species survey(s), additional pre-construction special-status species survey(s), avoidance and minimization measures within the limits of wildlife corridors during construction, contractor training by a qualified biologist, and/or construction monitoring by a qualified biologist. Additionally, per General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 5.3-2, any project applicants with the potential to impact a listed species during grading or construction would be required to obtain written authorization from USFWS for the “take” of that species. Following implementation of General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures 5.3-1 and 5.3-2, the General Plan EIR determined that construction within undeveloped Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 12
areas and construction within areas where land use changes are proposed would result in less than significant impacts to special-status species.

In addition, the General Plan includes policies within the Natural Resources Element and Coastal Element that would reduce impacts to biological resources during construction and operation of future development projects. Policy NR-1.01 would require that the most current information available regarding sensitive biological resources is used to guide planning decisions; Policy NR1.02 provides guidance for development within natural areas in a way that preserves biological resources; Policy NR-1.03 prohibits development within sensitive habitats, including Riparian Corridors, when feasible; Policy NR-1.04 defines the preservation of habitat of threatened and endangered species in place as the preferred habitat conservation strategy; Policy NR-1.05 encourages urban development within the costal canyons when such development improves the biological value and restores the function of the canyons; and Policy NR-1.06 states that the General Plan supports and follows the HCP and Habitat Management Program. Policy C-2.02 states that the City evaluates development projects as required under CEQA in order to protect the Coastal Zone; Policy C-2.05 prohibits encroachment of incompatible uses into coastal canyons and bluffs; Policy C-2.06 requires the use of native landscaping that is local to the region and consistent with the Coastal Zone (-CZ) Overlay District, and prohibits the planting of invasive species; Policy C-2.07 encourages native planting landscape restoration in coastal canyons and bluffs; Policy C-2.08 requires the protection of wetlands; Policy C-2.09 establishes coordination with State and federal resources protection agencies; Policy C-2.10 establishes the protection of and development limitations within Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHAs); Policy C2.11 provides guidelines for uses within the marine environment; and Policy C-2.12 discourages the introduction of non-native species.

Project‐Specific Analysis: As with the rest of the City, the project site is located within the USFWS Orange County Southern Subregion HCP; however, it should be noted that the City is not a Participating Jurisdiction under the HCP and does not receive take coverage under it. The project site, located within the North Beach/North El Camino Real Focus Area, is currently undeveloped, but disturbed; vegetation on-site is periodically mowed and exhibited different stages of growth. At times, the site becomes overgrown with various types of shrubs, including coastal sage scrub. As coastal sage scrub is known to support the California gnatcatcher, a sensitive species that was observed on-site in September 2025, as well as Crotch’s bumble bee, red diamond rattlesnake, and coast horned lizard, the proposed project could have potentially significant impacts on special-status species.

Per General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 5.3-1, a focused species survey may be required if one or more species has the potential to occur within the project vicinity, followed by additional preconstruction surveys in accordance with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and FESA; construction boundaries may be delineated and/or limited, and educational training to the construction contractor provided if sensitive biological resources (including trees) are identified on-site; and monitoring by a qualified biologist during construction may occur if sensitive biological resources (including trees) are identified on-site and thought to be impacted. As the project has potential to directly impact the California gnatcatcher the project would also implement General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 5.3-2, which requires the project Applicant to obtain written Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 13
authorization from the USFWS that the grading or construction activities are in compliance with regulations on the “take” of federally listed species that would directly or indirectly be impacted.

Further, General Plan policies NR-1.01, NR-1.04, NR-1.06, C-2.02, and C-2.09 would apply to the proposed project. Following compliance with General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures 5.3-1 and

5.3-2, implementation of applicable General Plan policies, and Conditions of Approval BIO-1 through BIO-8, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to sensitive plant and wildlife species, similar to those impacts identified for buildout of the General Plan.

As stated above, impacts to sensitive plant and wildlife species were evaluated in the General Plan EIR, and found to be less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. There are no impacts that are peculiar to the project or project site related to sensitive plant and wildlife species. No significant impacts that were not identified as significant under the General Plan EIR have resulted. No potentially significant off-site impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR have resulted. The project would not result in any increased severity of impacts due to substantial new information that was not known at the time of the General Plan EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further environmental review is required.

5.2 Impacts to Sensitive Natural Communities
b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Previous Significance Determination: The sensitive habitats in the City and its Sphere of Influence (SOI) include coastal sage scrub, coast live oak woodland and forest, and riparian communities such as mule fat scrub, southern willow scrub, and southern arroyo willow riparian forest. The majority of these sensitive habitats occur in land designated as Open Space-Publicly Owned or Open Space-Privately Owned, and would therefore not be impacted by implementation of the proposed General Plan. However, several patches of natural vegetation in the City are designated for residential development by the proposed General Plan, and as such the General Plan EIR determined that there would be potential for direct impacts to sensitive communities in these areas. With implementation of General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures 5.3-1 and 5.3-2, as well as applicable General Plan Policies NR-1.01, NR-1.02, NR-1.03, NR-1.04, NR-1.05, NR1.06, C-2.02, C-2.05, C-2.06, C-2.07, C-2.08, C-2.09, C-2.10, C-2.11, and C-2.12, it was determined that impacts to sensitive natural communities would be reduced to less than significant levels.

Project‐Specific Analysis: Riparian habitats are those occurring along the banks of rivers and streams. Sensitive natural communities are natural communities that are considered rare in the region by regulatory agencies, known to provide habitat for sensitive animal or plant species, or known to be important wildlife corridors.

The project site does not contain any critical habitat or riparian habitat and there would be no impacts to these habitat types. The project site does contain one sensitive natural community, Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 14
disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub. To further mitigate for the loss of this habitat General Plan Policies NR-1.01, NR-1.02, NR-1.03, NR-1.04, NR-NR-1.06, C-2.02, and C-2.09 would apply to the proposed project. Following implementation of applicable General Plan policies, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to sensitive natural communities.

As stated above, impacts to riparian habitats and sensitive natural communities were evaluated in the General Plan EIR, and found to be less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. As such, there are no impacts that are peculiar to the project or project site related to riparian habitats and sensitive natural communities. No significant impacts that were not identified as significant under the General Plan EIR have resulted. No potentially significant offsite impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR have resulted.

The project would not result in any increased severity of impacts due to substantial new information that was not known at the time of the General Plan EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further environmental review is required.

5.3 Impacts to State or Federal Wetlands
c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Previous Significance Determination: The General Plan EIR found that the ephemeral and intermittent streams distributed throughout the City and SOI, and areas identified as supporting riparian vegetation, are potential U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and CDFW jurisdictional waters and wetlands. As such, the General Plan EIR concluded that projects considered for approval under the proposed General Plan could impact waters of the US, waters of the State, and wetlands, and impacts would be potentially significant. Such impacts would be subject to the requirements of applicable Section 404 permits from the USACE, Section 401 water quality certification, USFWS review, and CDFW 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreements. Additionally, projects impacting waters of the US would be required to contract a qualified biologist to prepare a jurisdictional delineation to be incorporated into the CEQA documentation, per General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 5.3-3, and projects impacting jurisdictional waters, wetlands, and riparian habitat under the jurisdiction of the USACE, CDFW, and/or San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) would be required to obtain any additional permits and adhere to any additional permit-related avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures for impacts to jurisdictional resources, as specified by those agencies, per General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure

5.3-4. Following adherence to General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures 5.3-3 and 5.3-4, as well as implementation of General Plan Policies NR-1.02, NR-1.03, NR-1.04, NR-1.05, and NR-1.06, it was determined that impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands would be reduced to less than significant levels.

Project‐Specific Analysis: The project site does not contain any waters of the US, waters of the State, or wetlands under the jurisdiction of the USACE, CDFW, and/or San Diego RWQCB.

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 15
Therefore, the project Applicant is not required to obtain any regulatory permits from these agencies. The proposed project would result in no impacts to wetlands and aquatic resources.

As stated above, impacts to wetlands and aquatic resources were evaluated in the General Plan EIR, and found to be less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. As such, there are no impacts that are peculiar to the project or project site related to wetlands and aquatic resources. No significant impacts that were not identified as significant under the General Plan EIR have resulted. No potentially significant off-site impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR have resulted. The project would not result in any increased severity of impacts due to substantial new information that was not known at the time of the General Plan EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further environmental review is required.

5.4 Impacts to Wildlife Movement or Wildlife Corridors
d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Previous Significance Determination: The General Plan EIR identifies the major wildlife movement corridors as those within the HCP, which are located along the northern and northeastern boundaries of the City and in the SOI. The SOI is a preserve managed by the Donna O'Neill Land Conservancy and is identified as a nature preserve in the HCP. The General Plan does not propose any development in the SOI, and its status as a preserve indicates that it would not be developed in the future.

The lands along the northeastern and eastern borders of the City adjoin the Cristianitos Canyon habitat linkage, and are designated by the General Plan as Open Space-Privately Held. The open space lands along the northern border of the City that adjoin the Trampas Canyon habitat linkage are public open space, and no development would occur in this open space. Per General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 5.3-5, any future development projects located within a designated open space or identified as a major linkage/corridor would be required to prepare a habitat connectivity evaluation, as well as implement General Plan Policies NR-1.02, NR-1.03, and NR-1.06 in order to reduce impacts to less than significant levels.

Project‐Specific Analysis: Wildlife corridors and linkages are key features for wildlife movement between habitat patches. Wildlife corridors are generally defined as those areas that provide opportunities for individuals or local populations to conduct seasonal migrations, permanent dispersals, or daily commutes. Linkages generally refer to broader areas that provide movement opportunities (often between areas of conserved land) for multiple keystone/focal species or allow for propagation of ecological processes (i.e., for movement of pollinators). According to General Plan EIR Figure 5.3-6, Habitat Linkages, the project site is not located in an area with habitat linkages or wildlife corridors; the nearest linkages are located on the northeast side of the City, opposite the project site. The project site is periodically disturbed and mowed and is surrounded Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 16
on three sides by a chain-link fence and the fourth side abuts a commercial building. It provides no opportunity to serve as a wildlife migration corridor other than birds moving through the area.

While large mammals (e.g., coyotes or bobcats) may travel along the adjacent Segunda Deshecha Cañada Channel, this channel is a concrete box channel and covered along many segments and would not provide continuous wildlife movement nor movement between different regions for the purpose of species migration. Though project construction may cause temporary impacts to wildlife, if present, in the channel as a result of noise and disturbance, any impacts would be localized to the immediate area adjacent to the project site. Once constructed, future usage of the site would have similar impacts to the current ambient conditions and would not be expected to have any greater impacts than existing development.

The project site provides nesting habitat for bird species that could occur in the area. As nesting birds are protected pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC), additional measures listed under General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 5.3- 1 would be implemented. Additionally, General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 5.3-2 would be implemented in order to obtain written authorization from the USFWS that grading and construction activities would occur in compliance with regulations on the “take” of federally-listed bird species, particularly California gnatcatcher. Further, General Plan policies NR-1.01, NR-1.06, C-2.02, and C-2.09 would apply to the proposed project. Finally, Condition of Approval (COA) BIO-8 would require nesting bird surveys as required by the law (MBTA and CFGC). Following compliance with General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures 5.3-1 and 5.3-2 and applicable General Plan policies, as well as compliance with existing laws and regulations (enforced through COA BIO-8 pertaining to nesting birds), the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to migratory wildlife and native wildlife nurseries.

As stated above, impacts to migratory wildlife were evaluated in the General Plan EIR, and found to be less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. As such, there are no impacts that are peculiar to the project or project site related to migratory wildlife. No significant impacts that were not identified as significant under the General Plan EIR have resulted. No potentially significant off-site impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR have resulted. The project would not result in any increased severity of impacts due to substantial new information that was not known at the time of the General Plan EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further environmental review is required.

5.5 Conflicts with Local Policies or Ordinances
e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Previous Significance Determination: The General Plan EIR identified seven canyons as ESHAs, three of which (Calafia Canyon, Trafalgar Canyon, and Palizada Canyon) are entirely or partly within publicly owned open space; the remaining four are within areas already developed Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 17
with residential land uses. As such, impacts to canyons designated as ESHAs were determined to be less than significant.

The General Plan Focus Areas that are located within the Coastal Zone (excludes the amino de Estrella/Camino de los Mares and Rancho San Clemente Business Park areas) would be subject to General Plan Policies NR-1.05, C-2.02, and C-2.05 through C-2.12. Additionally, these Focus Areas would be subject to the goals and policies of the City’s Local Coastal Plan (LCP). Following adherence to existing City regulations, the General Plan EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan would not conflict with the Coastal Zone.

Project‐Specific Analysis: The project site is not located within the canyon ESHAs and is not subject to any Natural Community Conservation Plan; however, the site is located within the Coastal Zone. As such, the proposed project would be subject to the goals and policies of the City’s LCP; additionally, General Plan Policies NR-1.05, C-2.02, C-2.08, and C-2.09 are applicable to the proposed project. Following adherence to existing City regulations, the proposed project would not conflict with the Coastal Zone.

The Urban Design Element of the General Plan contains several policies related to the protection of the City’s mature trees, collectively referred to as its urban forest. Policy UD-6.05 requires that historically-significant trees are designated as historic resources and preserved wherever possible, and Policy UD-6.08 encourages the preservation of mature trees rather than tree removal. Additionally, the San Clemente Code of Ordinances Title 12, Chapter 12.24, Maintenance, repair protection, and landscaping of public property by abutting property owners, includes requirements for tree maintenance, trimming, and removal. As there are no trees present on the project site, the project would not conflict with any of the above tree policies or ordinances, and no impact would occur.

Impacts related to consistency with policies protecting biological resources were analyzed in the General Plan EIR and found to be less than significant. The project would not result in any impacts that are peculiar to the project or project site. No significant impacts that were not identified as significant under the General Plan EIR have resulted. No potentially significant off-site impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR have resulted. The project would not result in any increased severity of impacts due to substantial new information that was not known at the time of the General Plan EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further environmental review is required.

5.6 Conflicts with Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan
f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 18
Previous Significance Determination: The General Plan EIR determined that the City and SOI are geographically located within the Orange County Southern Subregion HCP, which regulates the “take” of selected federally threatened species, including the California gnatcatcher. The General Plan EIR included Mitigation Measure 3-2 which would require written authorization from the USFWS if a take would occur. However, the City of San Clemente is not a Participating Jurisdiction and does not receive take coverage under the HCP. The General Plan does not propose or permit any development within open space areas, areas within a land preserve, or land within a habitat reserve. While future development that may involve land use or zoning changes could be ineligible for regulatory coverage under the HCP, those projects could apply for separate take permits, and those projects, as with all development projects within the General Plan area, would be required to undergo project-level biological assessment under CEQA.

Overall, impacts were determined to be less than significant.

Project‐Specific Analysis: The project site is not located in any areas designated for open space uses, areas designated as supplemental open space under the Southern Subregion HCP, or areas within the Southern Subregion HCP Reserve (Attachment A, Figure 5, Southern Subregion HCP Map). The project site is currently zoned as Mixed Use within the General Plan EIR and is mapped as developed (i.e. not a natural vegetation community) in the Southern Subregion HCP, given the disturbed nature of the project site and surrounding developed uses. As such, the proposed project would be consistent with the Southern Subregion HCP, General Plan EIR, and General Plan Policy NR-1.06 in this regard. Impacts would be less than significant.

Impacts related to habitat conservation plans were analyzed in the General Plan EIR and found to be less than significant. The project would not result in any impacts that are peculiar to the project or project site. No significant impacts that were not identified as significant under the General Plan EIR have resulted. No potentially significant off-site impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR have resulted. The project would not result in any increased severity of impacts due to substantial new information that was not known at the time of the General Plan EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further environmental review is required.

6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
Implementation of the following General Plan EIR measures and policies would ensure compliance and consistency with the General Plan EIR, thus avoiding any further environmental review.

General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures:

MM 5.3-1 The City of San Clemente shall require applicants for public and private development projects that disturb vacant land to prepare a biological resources survey. The biological resources survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist and submitted to the City’s Planning Department. The biological resources survey shall include, but not be limited to: Analysis of available literature and biological Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 19
databases, such as the California Natural Diversity Database, to determine sensitive biological resources that have been reported historically from the proposed development project vicinity; review of current land use and land ownership within the proposed development project vicinity; Assessment and mapping of vegetation communities present within the proposed development project vicinity; and general assessment of potential jurisdictional areas, including wetlands and riparian habitats.
a) If the proposed development project site supports vegetation communities or mature trees that may provide habitat for special status plant or wildlife species, a focused habitat assessment shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine the potential for special status plant and/or animal species to occur within or adjacent to the proposed development project area.
b) If one or more special status species has the potential to occur within the proposed development project area, focused species surveys shall be conducted to determine the presence/absence of these species to adequately evaluate potential direct and/or indirect impacts to these species.
c) If construction activities are not initiated immediately after focused surveys have been completed, additional preconstruction special status species surveys may be required, in accordance with the California Endangered Species Act and Federal Endangered Species Act, to ensure impacts are avoided or minimized to the extent feasible. If preconstruction activities are required, a qualified biologist would perform these surveys as required for each special status species that is known to occur or has a potential to occur within or adjacent to the proposed development project area. d) If sensitive biological resources, including mature trees or wildlife corridors, are identified within or adjacent to the proposed development project area, as outlined in the biological resources report, the construction limits shall be clearly flagged to ensure impacts to sensitive biological resources and the wildlife corridor are avoided or minimized, to the extent feasible. Prior to implementing construction activities, the City of San Clemente shall require applicants to contract with a qualified biologist to verify that the flagging clearly delineates the construction limits and sensitive resources to be avoided.
e) If sensitive biological resources are known to occur within or adjacent to the proposed development project area, as outlined in the biological resources report, the City of San Clemente shall require applicants to contract with a qualified biologist to develop and implement a project-specific contractor training program to educate project contractors on the sensitive biological resources within and adjacent to the proposed development project area and measures being implemented to avoid and/or minimize impacts to Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 20
these species. Project Contractors shall be required to comply with the requirements of the program.
f) If sensitive biological resources are present within or adjacent to the proposed development project area and impacts may result from construction activities, as outlined in the biological resources report, the City may require that a developer retain a qualified biological monitor to be present during all or a portion of the construction activities to ensure impacts to the sensitive biological resources are avoided or minimized to the extent feasible. The specific biological monitoring requirements shall be determined on a project-by-project basis. The qualified biological monitor shall be approved by the City on a project-by-project basis based on applicable experience with the sensitive biological resources that may be impacted by the proposed development project activities.

MM 5.3-2 The City of San Clemente shall require applicants of public and private development projects that have the potential to affect listed species to obtain written authorization from the US Fish and Wildlife Service that the grading or construction activity is in compliance with regulations on the “take” of the listed species that would directly or indirectly be impacted. Any mitigation requirements set forth by such agencies shall be incorporated into the project’s final design plans.

General Plan EIR Policies:

NR-1.01 Information. We acquire and maintain the most current information available regarding the status and location of sensitive biological elements (species and natural communities) and use this information to guide decisions that could affect biological resources.

NR-1.02 Natural Areas. In natural areas that are undeveloped or essentially so, we require applicants for proposed projects to:
a) avoid significant impacts, including retention of sufficient natural space where appropriate;
b) retain watercourses, riparian habitat, and wetlands in their natural condition;
c) maintain habitat linkages (wildlife corridors) between adjacent open spaces, water sources and other habitat areas and incorporate these into transportation projects and other development projects to maintain habitat connectivity;
d) incorporate visually open fences, or vegetative cover to preserve views, ensure continued access and to buffer habitat areas, open space linkages or wildlife corridors from development, as appropriate; e) locate and design roads such that conflicts with biological resources, habitat areas, linkages or corridors are minimized; and Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 21
f) utilize open space or conservation easements when necessary to protect sensitive species or their habitats.

NR-1.03 Sensitive Habitats. We prohibit development and grading which alters the biological integrity of sensitive habitats, including Riparian Corridors unless no feasible project alternative exists which reduces environmental impacts to less than significant levels, or it is replaced with habitat of equivalent value, as acceptable to the City Council.
a) Where no environmentally feasible alternative exists, development within Riparian Corridors shall avoid removal of native vegetation; prevent erosion, sedimentation and runoff; provide for sufficient passage of native and anadromous fish; prevent wastewater discharges and entrapment; prevent groundwater depletion or substantial interference with surface and subsurface flows; and protect and re-establish natural vegetation buffers.

NR-1.04 Threatened and Endangered Species. We preserve the habitat of threatened and endangered species in place as the preferred habitat conservation strategy.

NR-1.06 Habitat Conservation Plan. We support and will follow the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Orange County Southern Subregion Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and Habitat Management Program.

C-2.02 Development Proposals. We protect the natural resources found in the Coastal Zone by evaluating development proposals, as required under the California Environmental Quality Act and as described in the Zoning Ordinance.

C-2.09 Coordination with State and Federal Agencies. We work with the state and federal resource protection agencies, businesses, private organizations and individuals to protect our natural and marine resources.

Applicable Conditions of Approval:

COA BIO-1 A focused habitat assessment for Crotch’s bumble bee shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine the potential for this species to occur within or adjacent to the proposed development project area. The habitat assessment shall conform to the requirements listed in the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) 2023 “Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Candidate Bumble Bee Species” and shall be submitted to the CDFW prior to initiation of ground disturbing project activities. (Required by General Plan Mitigation Measure 5.3-1)
COA BIO-2 Because coastal California gnatcatcher has a potential to be present within the proposed development project area, focused surveys conforming to the 1997 USFWS survey protocol will be required in order to adequately evaluate potential direct and/or indirect effects to this species. Because the City of San Clemente is Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 22
not a participating jurisdiction under any Natural Community Conservation Plans/Habitat Conservation Plans, a total of either six surveys at least one week apart between March 15 and June 30 or a total of either nine surveys at least two weeks apart between July 1 and March 14 will be required. In addition, if the habitat assessment determines that suitable habitat is present on-site, focused surveys for Crotch’s bumble bee conforming to the 2023 survey protocol listed above may also be required. If so, at least three surveys spaced between two and four weeks apart between April and August will be necessary as described in the protocol. Bumble bee surveys will be required each year that project activities have not been completed, if suitable habitat remains on-site. If Crotch’s bumble bee survey results are positive, the applicant will consult with the CDFW to determine if an Incidental Take Permit would be required under CESA depending on the extent and usage of the site by the species. (Required by General Plan Mitigation Measure 5.3-1) COA BIO-3 If construction activities are not initiated immediately after focused surveys have been completed, additional preconstruction coastal California gnatcatcher and/or Crotch’s bumble bee surveys may be required, in accordance with the California Endangered Species Act and Federal Endangered Species Act, to ensure impacts are avoided or minimized to the extent feasible. If preconstruction activities are required, a qualified biologist would perform these surveys as required for each special status species that is known to occur or has a potential to occur within or adjacent to the proposed development project area, including coastal California gnatcatcher, Crotch’s bumble bee, red diamond rattlesnake, and/or coast horned lizard. These may be combined with nesting bird protections as required under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code. (Required per FESA, MBTA, and CFGC)
COA BIO-4 Because sensitive coastal sage scrub habitat is present in areas immediately adjacent to the proposed development project area, the construction limits shall be clearly flagged to ensure impacts to adjacent habitats are avoided or minimized, to the extent feasible. Prior to implementing construction activities, the City of San Clemente shall require the Applicant to contract with a qualified biologist to verify that the flagging clearly delineates the construction limits and sensitive resources to be avoided.

COA BIO-5 Prior to the start of construction, a biologist must present a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) to the construction crew and project team. The WEAP will be focused on special-status species that are known to occur on-site or in the surrounding area including coastal California gnatcatcher and other species listed in the biological resources report that could occur such as Crotch’s bumble bee, red diamond rattlesnake, and coast horned lizard. The WEAP shall be presented to all new construction crew members prior to their first day of work on the project site, and a sign-in sheet of all attendees over time shall be kept for the project record.

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 23
COA BIO-6 A qualified and approved biological monitor shall be present during all vegetation removal and preliminary ground disturbance on the project site to ensure that impacts to sensitive biological resources are minimized or avoided. The monitor shall have the authority to halt construction if sensitive biological resources are present on-site during construction, and will be responsible for implementing nesting bird protections in compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code.

COA BIO-7 The applicant shall consult with the USFWS to determine if an incidental take permit under Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act will be required for this project.

With adequate protections in place including but not limited to biological monitoring and avoiding the coastal California gnatcatcher nesting season (February 15 through August 30), an incidental take permit may be avoidable. The USFWS will have the final authority to determine what avoidance measures or whether an incidental take permit will be required. (Required by General Plan Mitigation Measure 5.3-2)
COA BIO-8 To the greatest extent feasible, the Project will avoid construction activities during the peak nesting season (February 15 through September 15). If this time period cannot be avoided, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. Pre-construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the preconstruction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on-site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. (Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC))
Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 24

7.0 CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project, with implementation of the various measures and policies described above, is considered to be consistent with the General Plan EIR and no further environmental review is required. Please feel free to contact me at (949) 533-0918 or at [email protected] with any questions you may have regarding the results and/or conclusions of this report.

Sincerely,
Ryan Winkleman
Senior Biologist
Attachments
A. Figures
B. Site Photographs
C. Species Compendiums
D. CNDDB Literature Review Results
E. CNPS Literature Review Results
F. IPaC Literature Review Results
Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 25

REFERENCES
Baldwin et al. 2012, January. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Thoroughly Revised and Expanded, Second Edition.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2025. Natural Communities List Arranged Alphabetically by Life Form. February 2025.
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP/Natural-Communities Chesser, R. T., S. M. Billerman, K. J. Burns, C. Cicero, J. L. Dunn, B. E. Hernández-Baños, R. A.

Jiménez, Oscar Johnson, N. A. Mason, and P. C. Rasmussen. 2025. Check-list of North American Birds (online). American Ornithological Society. https://checklist.americanornithology.org/taxa/.

CNDDB (California Natural Diversity Database). 2026. RareFind 5 [Internet]. California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

CNPS (California Native Plant Society), Rare Plant Program. 2026. Rare Plant Inventory (online edition, v9.5). Website https://www.rareplants.cnps.org.

NABA (North American Butterfly Association). 2024. Checklist of North American Butterflies, Butterflies Occurring North of Mexico, Edition 2.3. Website https://naba.org/butterflynames-checklist/.

Nicholson, K. E. (ed.). 2025. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. Ninth Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. 87pp.

Reid, F.A. 2006. A Field Guide to Mammals of North America, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, New York.

Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation (Second Edition). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California, USA.

Sibley, D.A. 2014. The Sibley Guide to Birds, Second Edition. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York, New York.

Stebbins, R.C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, Third Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, New York.

USDA NRCS (US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2026.

Web Soil Survey. Website
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.

USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). 2026a. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC). Website https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/index.

Biological Resources Assessment March 12, 2026
Hanson Hotel Project Page 26
USFWS. 2026b. Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species. Website https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe098 93cf75b8dbfb77.

USFWS. 2026c. National Wetlands Inventory. Website
https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/.

Wilson, D.E., and D.M. Reeder, eds. 2005. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd ed. Online version. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/.

ATTACHMENT A
Figures

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Regional Vicinity
Figure 1
1/7/2026 JN \\Santca1hub\irvica1fs1\HROOT\pdata\210935\GIS\APRX\206711 Hanson Hotel NR\206711 Hanson Hotel NR.aprx

HANSON HOTEL PROJECT

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Source: ArcGIS Online, 2018
^_
Project
Site
Project Location
^
°
0 2.5 5
Miles
P a c i f i c O c e a n
Survey Area
Figure 2
°
0 60 120
Feet
1/7/2026 JN \\Santca1hub\irvica1fs1\HROOT\pdata\210935\GIS\APRX\206711 Hanson Hotel NR\206711 Hanson Hotel NR.aprx Legend
Project Site
Survey Area (300-foot Buffer)

HANSON HOTEL PROJECT

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Source: Nearmap/Raymore Imagery (2025)
N El Camino Real
E
Aven di a P ci o
209
102
134
115
177
100
USDA Soils Map
Figure 3
°
0 60 120
Feet
1/7/2026 JN \\Santca1hub\irvica1fs1\HROOT\pdata\210935\GIS\APRX\206711 Hanson Hotel NR\206711 Hanson Hotel NR.aprx Legend
Project Site
Survey Area (300-foot Buffer)
Alo clay, 30 to 50 percent
slopes, warm MAAT, MLRA 20
Alo clay, 9 to 15 percent slopes
Beaches
Calleguas clay loam, 50 to
75 percent slopes, eroded
Myford sandy loam, 9 to
30 percent slopes, eroded
Sorrento clay loam, 2 to 9 percent
slopes, warm MAAT, MLRA 19

HANSON HOTEL PROJECT

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Source: Nearmap/Raymore Imagery (2025), USDA (09/2025)
N El Camino Real
E
Aven di a P ci o
102
100
115
134
177
209
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Figure 4
°
0 60 120
Feet
1/7/2026 JN \\Santca1hub\irvica1fs1\HROOT\pdata\210935\GIS\APRX\206711 Hanson Hotel NR\206711 Hanson Hotel NR.aprx Legend
Project Site
Survey Area
(300-foot Buffer)
California Sagebrush - (Purple
Sage) Scrub (1.16 acres)
Disturbed California Sagebrush
- (Purple Sage) Scrub (0.24 acre)
Coyote Brush Scrub (0.83 acre)
Disturbed Coast Prickly
Pear Scrub (0.41 acre)
Disturbed Menzies’s Golden
Bush Scrub (0.36 acre)
Quailbush Scrub (0.14 acre)
Disturbed Quailbush Scrub
(0.30 acre)
Disturbed (0.70 acre)
Developed (7.97 acres)

HANSON HOTEL PROJECT

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Source: Nearmap/Raymore Imagery (2025)
N El Camino Real
E
Aven di a P ci o
Southern Subregion HCP Map
Figure 5
°
0 250 500
Feet
2/26/2026 JN \\Santca1hub\irvica1fs1\HROOT\pdata\210935\GIS\APRX\206711 Hanson Hotel NR\206711 Hanson Hotel NR.aprx Legend
Project Site
Survey Area (300-foot Buffer)
Supplemental Open Space
Coastal Recreation Commercial
CRC1 Zoned Property

HANSON HOTEL PROJECT

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Source: Nearmap/Raymore Imagery (2025), USFWS (2015)
N El Camino Real
E Avenida Pico
Orange County Southern Subregion HCP
W Avenida
Vista
Hermosa
P a c i f i c O c e a n

ATTACHMENT B
Site Photographs
Attachment B – Site Photographs
Hanson Hotel Project B-1
Biological Resources Assessment
Photograph 1: Northeast-facing view from the southwest corner of the Project site in December 2025 showing disturbed land.

Photograph 2: North/northeast-facing view from the eastern portion of the project site in December 2025 depicting disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub and quailbush scrub.

Attachment B – Site Photographs
Hanson Hotel Project B-2
Biological Resources Assessment
Photograph 3: Northwest-facing view from December 2025 of the Project site’s interior depicting disturbed Menzies’s golden bush scrub.

Photograph 4: Northwest-facing view from East Avenida Pico in December 2025 of the survey area showing disturbed quailbush scrub.

Attachment B – Site Photographs
Hanson Hotel Project B-3
Biological Resources Assessment
Photograph 5: Southeast-facing view from the northern boundary of the survey area in December 2025 depicting coyote brush scrub.

Photograph 6: Northeast-facing view from the southwestern corner of the survey area in December 2025 showing disturbed California sagebrush - (purple sage) scrub.

Attachment B – Site Photographs
Hanson Hotel Project B-4
Biological Resources Assessment
Photograph 7: Northwest-facing view from the central portion of the survey area in December 2025 showing disturbed coast prickly pear scrub immediately west of Segunda Deshecha Cañada.

ATTACHMENT C
Species Compendiums
Attachment C – Wildlife Species Observed List
Hanson Hotel Project C-1
Biological Resources Assessment
Species Type: Scientific Name Common Name Status: Federal/State Status: Other Birds
ACCIPITRIDAE—HAWKS, KITES, EAGLES, & ALLIES
Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk
Circus hudsonius northern harrier SSC
PASSERELLIDAE—NEW WORLD SPARROWS
Melospiza melodia song sparrow
Melozone crissalis California towhee
Zonotrichia leucophrys white-crowned sparrow
CORVIDAE—CROWS & JAYS
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
TROCHILIDAE—HUMMINGBIRDS
Calypte anna Anna's hummingbird
Selasphorus sasin Allen's hummingbird
TROGLODYTIDAE—WRENS
Thryomanes bewickii Bewick's wren
Troglodytes aedon house wren
PARULIDAE—WOOD-WARBLERS
Geothlypis trichas common yellowthroat
Leiothlypis celata orange-crowned warbler
Setophaga coronata yellow-rumped warbler
SYLVIIDAE—SYLVIID WARBLERS
Chamaea fasciata wrentit
LARIDAE—GULLS, TERNS, & SKIMMERS
Larus occidentalis western gull
FRINGILLIDAE—FRINGILLINE & CARDUELINE FINCHES & ALLIES
Haemorhous mexicanus house finch
COLUMBIDAE—PIGEONS & DOVES
Columba livia rock pigeon (rock dove)*
Zenaida macroura mourning dove
TYRANNIDAE—TYRANT FLYCATCHERS
Sayornis nigricans black phoebe
MIMIDAE—MOCKINGBIRDS & THRASHERS
Toxostoma redivivum California thrasher
Attachment C – Wildlife Species Observed List
Hanson Hotel Project C-2
Biological Resources Assessment
Species Type: Scientific Name Common Name Status: Federal/State Status: Other POLIOPTILIDAE—GNATCATCHERS
Polioptila caerulea blue-gray gnatcatcher
Polioptila californica californica coastal California gnatcatcher FT, SSC STURNIDAE—STARLINGS
Sturnus vulgaris European starling*
* Non-native
Status Legend:

Federal: FT: Federally listed as threatened
State: SSC: California Species of Special Concern
Attachment C – Plant Species Observed List
Hanson Hotel Project C-3
Biological Resources Assessment
Species Type: Scientific Name Common Name Status: Federal/State Status: Other

EUDICOTS
AIZOACEAE—Fig-Marigold Family
Malephora crocea coppery mesemb*
ANACARDIACEAE—Sumac Or Cashew Family
Rhus integrifolia lemonade berry
ASTERACEAE—Sunflower Family
Artemisia californica California sagebrush
Baccharis pilularis coyote brush
Baccharis salicifolia mulefat
Dittrichia graveolens stinkwort*
Encelia californica California brittle bush
Isocoma menziesii Menzies’s golden bush
Pseudognaphalium californicum ladies' tobacco
BORAGINACEAE—Borage Family
Heliotropium curassavicum salt heliotrope
BRASSICACEAE—Mustard Family
Hirschfeldia incana short podded mustard*
CACTACEAE—Cactus Family
Cylindropuntia prolifera coast cholla
Opuntia littoralis coast prickly pear
CHENOPODIACEAE—Goosefoot Family
Atriplex lentiformis quailbush
Chenopodium album lambsquarters*
Salsola australis Russian thistle*
CLEOMACEAE—Cleome Family
Peritoma arborea bladderpod
MYRSINACEAE—Myrsine Family
Lysimachia arvensis scarlet pimpernel*
POLYGONACEAE—Buckwheat Family
Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat
SOLANACEAE—Nightshade Family
Attachment C – Plant Species Observed List
Hanson Hotel Project C-4
Biological Resources Assessment
Species Type: Scientific Name Common Name Status: Federal/State Status: Other Lycium andersonii Anderson’s boxthorn
Solanum douglasii greenspot nightshade
VERBENACEAE—Vervain Family
Verbena lasiostachys western vervain

MONOCOTS
POACEAE—Grass Family
Distichlis spicata salt grass
Elymus condensatus giant wild rye
STRELITZIACEAE—No Common Name
Strelitzia nicolai giant bird of paradise *
* Non-native

ATTACHMENT D
CNDDB Literature Review Results
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Actinemys pallida
southwestern pond turtle
ARAAD02032 Proposed
Threatened
None G2 SNR SSC
Agelaius tricolor
tricolored blackbird
ABPBXB0020 None Threatened G1G2 S2 SSC
Aimophila ruficeps canescens
southern California rufous-crowned sparrow
ABPBX91091 None None G5T3 S4 WL
Anaxyrus californicus
arroyo toad
AAABB01230 Endangered None G1G2 S2 SSC
Anniella stebbinsi
Southern California legless lizard
ARACC01060 None None G3 S3 SSC
Antrozous pallidus
pallid bat
AMACC10010 None None G4 S3 SSC
Arizona elegans occidentalis
California glossy snake
ARADB01017 None None G5T2 S2 SSC
Aspidoscelis hyperythra
orange-throated whiptail
ARACJ02060 None None G5 S2S3 WL
Athene cunicularia
burrowing owl
ABNSB10010 None Candidate
Endangered
G4 S2 SSC
Bombus crotchii
Crotch's bumble bee
IIHYM24480 None Candidate
Endangered
G2 S2
Bombus pensylvanicus
American bumble bee
IIHYM24260 None None G3G4 S2
Branchinecta sandiegonensis
San Diego fairy shrimp
ICBRA03060 Endangered None G2 S1
Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis
coastal cactus wren
ABPBG02095 None None G5T3Q S2 SSC
Chaetodipus californicus femoralis
Dulzura pocket mouse
AMAFD05021 None None G5T3 S3
Chaetodipus fallax fallax
northwestern San Diego pocket mouse
AMAFD05031 None None G5T3T4 S3S4
Choeronycteris mexicana
Mexican long-tongued bat
AMACB02010 None None G3G4 S1 SSC
Coelus globosus
globose dune beetle
IICOL4A010 None None G1G2 S1S2
Crotalus ruber
red-diamond rattlesnake
ARADE02090 None None G4 S3 SSC
Quad IS (Dana Point (3311746) OR San Clemente (3311745)) AND Taxonomic Group IS (Fish OR Amphibians OR Reptiles OR Birds OR Mammals OR Mollusks OR Arachnids OR Crustaceans OR Insects) Query Criteria:

Report Printed on Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Commercial Version -- Dated November, 30 2025 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 2 Information Expires 5/30/2026
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Danaus plexippus plexippus pop. 1
monarch - California overwintering population
IILEPP2012 Proposed
Threatened
None G4T1T2Q S2
Dipodomys stephensi
Stephens' kangaroo rat
AMAFD03100 Threatened Threatened G2 S3
Elanus leucurus
white-tailed kite
ABNKC06010 None None G5 S3S4 FP
Empidonax traillii extimus
southwestern willow flycatcher
ABPAE33043 Endangered Endangered G5T2 S3
Eucyclogobius newberryi
tidewater goby
AFCQN04010 Endangered None G3 S3 SSC
Eumops perotis californicus
western mastiff bat
AMACD02011 None None G4G5T4 S3S4 SSC
Gila orcuttii
arroyo chub
AFCJB13120 None None G1 S2 SSC
Icteria virens
yellow-breasted chat
ABPBX24010 None None G5 S4 SSC
Myotis yumanensis
Yuma myotis
AMACC01020 None None G5 S4
Neotoma lepida intermedia
San Diego desert woodrat
AMAFF08041 None None G5T3T4 S3S4 SSC
Nyctinomops femorosaccus
pocketed free-tailed bat
AMACD04010 None None G5 S3 SSC
Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 10
steelhead - southern California DPS
AFCHA0209J Endangered Endangered G5T1Q S1
Perognathus longimembris pacificus
Pacific pocket mouse
AMAFD01042 Endangered Candidate
Endangered
G5T2 S2 SSC
Phrynosoma blainvillii
coast horned lizard
ARACF12100 None None G4 S4 SSC
Plestiodon skiltonianus interparietalis
Coronado skink
ARACH01114 None None G5T5 S2S3 WL
Polioptila californica californica
coastal California gnatcatcher
ABPBJ08081 Threatened None G4G5T3Q S2 SSC
Spea hammondii
western spadefoot
AAABF02020 Proposed
Threatened
None G2G3 S3S4 SSC
Streptocephalus woottoni
Riverside fairy shrimp
ICBRA07010 Endangered None G1G2 S2
Thamnophis sirtalis pop. 1
south coast gartersnake
ARADB3613F None None G5T1T2 S1S2 SSC
Vireo bellii pusillus
least Bell's vireo
ABPBW01114 Endangered Endangered G5T2 S3
Record Count: 38
Report Printed on Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Commercial Version -- Dated November, 30 2025 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 of 2 Information Expires 5/30/2026
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Aphanisma blitoides
aphanisma
PDCHE02010 None None G3G4 S2 1B.2
Atriplex coulteri
Coulter's saltbush
PDCHE040E0 None None G3 S2 1B.2
Atriplex pacifica
south coast saltscale
PDCHE041C0 None None G4 S2 1B.2
Brodiaea filifolia
thread-leaved brodiaea
PMLIL0C050 Threatened Endangered G2 S2 1B.1
Calochortus weedii var. intermedius
intermediate mariposa-lily
PMLIL0D1J1 None None G3G4T3 S3 1B.2
Chaenactis glabriuscula var. orcuttiana
Orcutt's pincushion
PDAST20095 None None G5T1 S1 1B.1
Chorizanthe polygonoides var. longispina
long-spined spineflower
PDPGN040K1 None None G5T3 S3 1B.2
Comarostaphylis diversifolia ssp. diversifolia
summer holly
PDERI0B011 None None G3T2 S2 1B.2
Dudleya blochmaniae ssp. blochmaniae
Blochman's dudleya
PDCRA04051 None None G3T2 S2 1B.1
Dudleya multicaulis
many-stemmed dudleya
PDCRA040H0 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Eryngium pendletonense
Pendleton button-celery
PDAPI0Z120 None None G1 S1 1B.1
Euphorbia misera
cliff spurge
PDEUP0Q1B0 None None G5 S2 2B.2
Harpagonella palmeri
Palmer's grapplinghook
PDBOR0H010 None None G4 S3 4.2
Isocoma menziesii var. decumbens
decumbent goldenbush
PDAST57091 None None G3G5T2T3 S2 1B.2
Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri
Coulter's goldfields
PDAST5L0A1 None None G4T2 S2 1B.1
Lycium brevipes var. hassei
Santa Catalina Island desert-thorn
PDSOL0G0N0 None None G5T1Q S1 3.1
Monardella hypoleuca ssp. intermedia
intermediate monardella
PDLAM180A4 None None G4T2? S2? 1B.3
Myosurus minimus ssp. apus
little mousetail
PDRAN0H031 None None G5T2Q S2 3.1
Navarretia prostrata
prostrate vernal pool navarretia
PDPLM0C0Q0 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Quad IS (Dana Point (3311746) OR San Clemente (3311745)) AND Taxonomic Group IS (Ferns OR Gymnosperms OR Monocots OR Dicots OR Lichens OR Bryophytes) Query Criteria:

Report Printed on Monday, January 12, 2026
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 2 2026 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 2 Information Expires 7/2/2026
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Nolina cismontana
chaparral nolina
PMAGA080E0 None None G3 S3 1B.2
Pentachaeta aurea ssp. allenii
Allen's pentachaeta
PDAST6X021 None None G4T1 S1 1B.1
Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum
white rabbit-tobacco
PDAST440C0 None None G4 S2 2B.2
Quercus dumosa
Nuttall's scrub oak
PDFAG050D0 None None G3 S3 1B.1
Senecio aphanactis
chaparral ragwort
PDAST8H060 None None G3 S2 1B.2
Suaeda esteroa
estuary seablite
PDCHE0P0D0 None None G3 S2 1B.2
Record Count: 25
Report Printed on Monday, January 12, 2026
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 2 2026 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 of 2 Information Expires 7/2/2026
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest
Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest
CTT61310CA None None G4 S4
Southern Coastal Salt Marsh
Southern Coastal Salt Marsh
CTT52120CA None None G2 S2.1
Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Forest
Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Forest
CTT61330CA None None G3 S3.2
Southern Dune Scrub
Southern Dune Scrub
CTT21330CA None None G1 S1.1
Southern Foredunes
Southern Foredunes
CTT21230CA None None G2 S2.1
Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland
Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland
CTT62400CA None None G4 S4
Valley Needlegrass Grassland
Valley Needlegrass Grassland
CTT42110CA None None G3 S3.1
Record Count: 7
Quad IS (Dana Point (3311746) OR San Clemente (3311745)) AND Taxonomic Group IS (Dune OR Scrub OR Herbaceous OR Marsh OR Riparian OR Woodland OR Forest OR Alpine OR Inland Waters OR Marine OR Estuarine OR Riverine OR Palustrine) Query Criteria:

Report Printed on Monday, January 12, 2026
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 2 2026 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 1 Information Expires 7/2/2026
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database

ATTACHMENT E
CNPS Literature Review Results

"#$
%&&'()*&&'(
+
,-./012/3/.
1450 .65561 1450 345/787/303695
:7665/1; <09/6= 30=
7/-2
-2420
7/-2
;76:47
941> -2420941> .4
9 90
<7412 941> .4
01=05/.
=420
4==0= <?626
@ABCDEFGFBEHEGF IJKLMNKO

PJIQJNM

RSTUMVWNMTJMJXJIJNNWMY
ZJIQ
[JQOR\PR\NJR\NJ]^_`a^bc dee^O
fdOfd
gcff`
hZIWLU\XZJI
ibhZIWLUWJ
@jkFDElGF AmEHCEnolMXZMNWLpM hZJN\X\KWMTJMJMNNqMYZJIQ[JQOrqNR\NJR\NJ]`]^_cdsbc detfO fdOfd
gcfdf
iMIIS_uMIK
@BHoGElEFjFmGoBE _MNvWJV\
LMVJu\IU
wLUJIMTJMJXJIJNNWMY
KJTWKq\qL
LZIqQ
x[JQyzMSO
_JX
R\NJR\NJ]`a_`a^bc de{^O
fdOfd
gcfd^
|JWIz\ILJ
@HBEjmo}~CmHoBE h\qYUJIL
LMYUQqLZ
hZJN\X\KWMTJMJXJIJNNWMY
ZJIQ
zMIOTUR\NJR\NJ]`_cdsbc dee^O
fdOfd R\Z\U\
wPMWYMQYJ
@HBEjmo}jF~EE~F L\qUZT\MLU

LMYULTMYJ
hZJN\X\KWMTJMJMNNqMYZJIQ zMIOTUR\NJR\NJ]^_cdsbc dee^O fdOfd R\Z\U\
wPMWYMQYJ
FkECjlElmF~EDEFHF _MNvWJV\
h\qNUS
PWVqWJIM
wLUJIMTJMJXJIJNNWMY
LZIqQ
[JQO
rqNxwqVy
R\NJR\NJ]^_^^b` de{^O
fdOfd R\Z\U\
wPMWYMQYJ
BCnEFoFEmECmEF UZIJMKOYJMPJK
QI\KWMJM

ZJpWKMTJMJXJIJNNWMY
QqYQWJI\qL
ZJIQ
zMIOrqN[
h]c_cdsbdJL de{^O
fdOfd
gcfd
|JWIz\ILJ
FmC~kCBHloonEE
EDHoBGonEl
WNUJIpJKWMUJ
pMIWX\LMOYWYS
iWYWMTJMJXJIJNNWMY
QqYQWJI\qL
ZJIQ
zMSOrqYR\NJR\NJ]`]^
`_`dsbcJL dee^O
fdOfd R\Z\U\
wPMWYMQYJ

¡ ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª§«¬®¯§°±²³±´¯±²µ®¶·«¯®¸¹¬¯º»°²º ¹²²¼º¤ ®®¯¼°±²º½¸±¼º½µ®¾ «¯®¸¹ ®¯º»°²¿À®ÁÂÃÄº°ÂÄÅ»ÆÂ¥¥ÇÈ¢¤¥¥ÇÈÉ¤Ä¯°¯´Â¤Á¤µ É

! "
"#$%
&
'
'
()*)+ ,--)
.,., '/ 0
1
!

2
34
5 67838 9:;<
73844

!%1
'
'
(=>,*,,?@, A..,
.,., '/ 0
1
!

27B42

442
3
/

C

/
#

! "#1
'
'
(+*+)@A ,--)
.,., '/ 0
1
!

27B42

D5E
9:;<
5

F

C

/
#

!1%

'
'
(=>+*+,?@A ,--)
.,., '/ 0
1
!

442

74
F

!$G
!&"
%
$1
&
'
'
(+()*+)@A ,-H.
.,., '/ 0
1
!

742D
EI
7J KKL<
EI
7J

!
1%
'
'
(+>A*A,?@A ,-H.
.,., '/ 0
1
!

I I8 8
8

C

F

#
N

! "%

'
'
()*))@A ,--)
.,., '/ 0
1
!

O
E7
38 4

0
0
10

!$"&1
'
'
'
()*))@A A..,
.,., '/ 0
1
!

O32E7
33E
4

0

F
F
N

!
$%&"
%

'
'
(+()*+*))@A ,-Q)
.,., '/ 0
1
!

O8E
D
6 32
KKL<
6 32

?

F
F

#
N

!
1%
'
'
(+>A*A,?@, ,-Q)
.,.,
RA.,,
1M@
* O8E
D
8 438
#
0

F
F
F

#
N

!
1%

'
'
(A*A,?@AS
,-Q)
.,., '/ 0
1
!

T7D58

E
4

/
F

0
!
00

#
1

!
1
%
$%

&
'
'
(,*,,?@,S
A..,
.,.,
RA..-
U

F0
T7D42742
EJJ8/

V
#C

/ #

!1%
'
'
()*+)@+ ,-Q)
.,.,
W
UF
CCX
A.,-
YZY[Z[\]Y^_`abcdaefghiajgklmkniklohpqeighrsfitujlt sllvt^ZZhghivjgkltwrkvtwohxZeighrsZhitujlyzh{|}~tj|Y~ug|__YY\^__YY^~ijin|^{^o[Z

!"#
$
%
%
&'())*+) ,-./#
0,#0, %
1
$2

3 45
66 6

1 78

9
*

:
#:
;%
%
&/(</+) ,-=0#
0,#0,
>
)0,'
?
:
36@
A4 B
CCDE

654 B

:
;#%2%
%
&'F<(</+)G ,--/#
0,#0,
>
)0,<
$

*
3H

5B
@
H
5 2

:
#I
%
%
&<&/(<(/<+) ,--/#
0,#0, %
1
$2

J
@

LMNE
H
@

5 O7

O

$

$#%2%
%
&<&'F)F<(),*+) ,--/#
0,#0, %
1
$2

P5@

CCDE
6 6H
Q

;

I

:
!:
;#
I

%
%
&'F'(//+) ,-==#
0,#0,
>
)0,-
*
O

S
T
B
5
46 B
CCDE
@6B

U 8
OO
$

V#I
%
%
&/F)(),*+, ,--/#
0,#0,
>
)0,<
?
:
T
H

A45@

LMNE
5
5
W

8
#

*

#I%
%
&'F<(</+< ,--/#
0,#0,
>
)0,'
?
:
T

54
66
@ Q;#

OO

I
# %
%
&)&<()(<< G ,--/#
0,#0,
>
)0,'
$

(
TX@

LMNE

(

O
O #

(

OO

I

$!%
%
&'F,Z(,<+,G ,-./#
0,#0, %
1
$2

TX@

@ 6[5@

(

:
#
$
"!
%
%
&/(//+) )00,#
0,#0, %
1
$2

] 6 @B^

^ B6

LMNE

^ B6

7
\
$

R7

:
#(%
%
&'F/(//+)G )00,#
0,#0, %
1
$2

_`_a`abc
_def
ghijgk
lmno
gpmqr
sqtoqrunv
w
komnxy
loz{prz
yrr|zd``nmno|pmqrz}xq|z}un~`komnxy`noz{prnzp_
{mee__bdee__dopotddue`

!

$$%
&

' (
()*$
*$
+,-,.,,/0 0112
1212
3 0124
5 !&

.6

$'

7 8

: !

6 $$

& ;#%
&

'
"6
.
6*$
*$
+,-0<.0<2=/>?
0120
22@
3 012@
5$
A$

&

989

%
# 5$%$!%!

$$%
&

' (
B%$*$
*$
+4-0C.0>/2 2DE1
1212 *
F&#
"G '

H
I

6 #
#

$
6
$G

#
F
$ !

$$%
&

'"6
B%*$
*$
+0.02=/0?
0112
1212 *
F&#
"G '

H
8

98
8 !&6

$ $
5%!!

6 $$

7 $
&
%'
J(
K()
B%
*$
*$
+>.>2=/0?
0112
1212
3 0114
.$#
( !
(%$# $
*# $
5 !

# $
"

8
"
$M
6 $#!&
#
"#

!

$$%
&

' (
B%$*$
*$
+,-2.22=/2?
011E
141E
3011E
='
"
$
L8

7
$
)

6 $#!&
#
"#

!

$$%
&

' (
B%*$
*$
+,->.>,/0 0112
1212 *
F&#
"G '

NOP

%#&
!#
'
$!& $7
6&!

Q)
6&)!

6 $$
&

'
(
"%7*$
*$
+4<->C.>>/0 011R
142R *
F&#
"G '

!&6

$

!&
S
!& !

6 $$
&

'
(
B%$*$
*$
+>.>.,,/0 0112
1212 *
F&#
"G '

L
8

9 & #

'' #
#'!!
"#

!

6 $$
&

'
JB%K"%7
*GJT
!K
*$
*$
+,.00=/0 011@
221>
3 "$%U
F
V&
$
*#&$
+

WXWYXYZ[
W\]^
_`ab_c
defg
_heij
kilgijmfn
o
cgefpq
dgrshjr
qjjtr\XXfefgtheijrupitrumfvXcgefpqXfgrshjwxfyz{|rhzW|}se~z]]WWZ\]]WW\|ghglz\y\mX

!
"
#$%!
"&

'()(*+,* *--.!
/*!/*
0
"

123

1144
5 6

7
7

$!8

'()(.,9 *-::!
/*!/*
0
"

;<41
=
>4

1=
?@ABC4<4

6
D0%

7
7

$%!"

'EF.)..,( *-G.!
/*!/*
0
"

;

1H

3=4 I
6

J

%
0

K6

$!
8#"&

'.)..,9 *-G.!
/*!/*
0
"

L3
24133

41
1
%

!
6
)

'('.)(M.,* *-G.!
/*!/*
0
"

L14

><
1 =4

D
"

8
!
"
#$%&

'()9*+,9 *--.!
/*!/*

N6
L

=

%

I

7

#8
!
$%&8!
O

'()9*+,9 *-:.!
/*!/*
0
"

L

=
P4C
34 D%

I

7

8
!Q

'.)()..,9 *--.!
/*!/*
0
"

RSTUVWXYZT[YT\[Y]WZ^V]_
`ababac
deffghigjklimilnop
qrsV\T^WVrtrZVu]vsrWZRTwV]Zxyzr^]vsrWZv^TX^r{|}~}|zr^]vsrWZWu]WZT^xTWsVW]]VZVTWyu|[|Y| ]_VZ]SZZ_UUU|^r^]srWZ_|wW_|T^Xrww]__]Y}rWr^x}~}| ¡¢ £ ¡¤¥¦§¨©ª¡© ¨¡¡«©« ¡©¬§ «©¬¤§¨©ª¡®¯°±²³©±³´ªµ±¶·¶·¸³£±°¤¸¸

ATTACHMENT F
IPaC Literature Review Results

!"!#

$"% "#$"&

'
(
)

&

&

*

&

!+ (*

'

)

-!!*

&
-!!*

!
/ (

&

"#$" (
&

&

!0

"*2

/* "#$"#

*

3$4$

!
5

6
#7
$5
89:;<=>-?<<;
@9:;<=>-A?;>
B>99"
'7

-"

BA;
6
*67?B;;C-9=CA
TUVW DEFEGHIJKLHMNMHOPFPQRHSP

#
" $%&#"'
##
%(
%#
%#) "* "+,#&
'"!
,%,
%-.&&
#
"
(

%"!
!($ ,/.012
!"%,
%

(%"," %
&&-. .01
,($&%

%"$#%
&"!#%,
%
'
!#%,
%,"$(&3
&
,#(
!!,#&3

,#
4 #
%
#
#

/-'-5(
,
'
&

$%#

"!
!
%"$(
#
" 4
!#
#!
%&"% "#",,$
##&

%
#5

&
,#(

,##%,
%3&$,
'"(

#
'*
#!("*&"* %#

2-6,
$%%,
%,

"45
&%
#," &
#
" %,
,
'5#
%,
%" #
%(
%#
"#'$

#&#"3!"$ &" "
#"7,#

-"!$((&#

"# #

(!!,#%#"%,
%5

&&
#
"
(%
#8%,
!
,
&"7,#8%,
!
,
!"

#
"
%"!# 9$
&-
:,#
" ;"!#< &
'&:,
%.,#=>?@A=>BC&
(
' ,
%#"D9$%#"!#:,#

!"

#
" *#
%,
%
*
,
%(
%#&"""%&#"3(
%#&

3% #
#

"!%$,""%&
,#
" D!"
"7,##
#
%," &$,#&5

##&5
!$ &&5"(
, %&3
C&
(
' ,-.(##!"
#(",
("!!
,
&
%,
%(
%#*
,!$(!
((%#
%9$

#,
EFGH3
"3#

&39$%#
'
"!!
,

(%,
%(
%#!"

##I'$(
#"I4
*%,#
"
1J
K/%&
,#
" %3("*2"!"
#(",
(
!
(&"!!
,&
,#(-
C""7,#4
($
#
" %#
#9$
L:CM:," ,$ ,N4
*5(
%#$ #"#1J
K*3%
#
&9$%#
"!!
,

(%,
%(
%#3
&"
'#!"(("*
'O
P-Q
*#"7,#(",
#
"
&,(
,)K0R1RL<-
S-K(
,)Q<C1R<JI0T<K-
U-V"'
/
!&
,#&#"&"%"2-
W-J"4
&

&&%,
#
" !""$"7,#-
X-K(
,)I<YL<::J<K1<:V1:-
V
%#&%,
%
&#
,
#
,
(
3 #
#%

'&3#Z[\]\^_[`]abcd_[befc\^c`g"!#L-:-C
%
&M
(&(
!:4
,
/L:CM:2
&#!
%
%&
4 %
" "!#R
#
"
(0,

,
&.#
"%
,.&

%#
#
" /R0..C
%
%2-
:,
%
&,
#
,
(
3 #
#%$ &#%"(%" %
3 (
#"!R0..C
%
%
FEh%"* " #
%(
%#-J(
%," #
,#ijkkl_embc_be
!"enb[_beopqbcrmb_csoc_eq_[r_\pP-:,
%(
%#&$ &#< &
'&:,
%.,#
#
# &" &
'&t1J
K
(%"%"*%%,
%#
#
,
&
&
#%5"
""%&5!"(
%#
'-:#]_er_p^er`roen`^b!"
"
!"

#
" -1J
K" (%"*%%,
%#
#
'$(
#&3L:CM:/%
C.Y2-
S-ijkkl_embc_be5
(%") "*
%#R
#
"
(u

C
%
%:4
,/RuC:25
%
"!!
,"!#R
#
"
(0,

,
&.#
"%
,
.&

%#
#
" *
#
#Q
#
#"!K"

,-
!"(("*
'%,
%
"# #

((
!!,#&3
,#
4 #
%
#
%(",
#
" O
v
w
R.u< :.L:

J
,
!
,J",)#u"$%J"'
#$%(" '

3
%
,
!
,$%
M4!"$ &
R",
#
,
(
3 #
#
%3 &%
'
#&!"#
%%,
%-
mrrnexyyb[\ez{|ez^\dyb[nyenb[_bey}~}~
< &
'&
R.u< :.L:

K
(
!"

V
%# :# $(

#
((
$
3"*

M4!"$ &
R",
#
,
(
3 #
#
%3 &%
'
#&!"#
%%,
%-
mrrnexyyb[\ez{|ez^\dyb[nyenb[_bey}v~
< &
'&
K"
%#
(K
(
!"

#,
#,J"(
"#
(
,
(
!"
,
,
(
!"
,

M4!"$ &

%AFG,
#
,
(
3 #
#!"#
%%,
%-"$(",
#
" &"% "#"4(
#,
#
,
(
3 #
#-
mrrnexyyb[\ez{|ez^\dyb[nyenb[_bey}v}

# &
V
%#6((
%
"
"3((

$%
(($%
M4!"$ &

%AFG,
#
,
(
3 #
#!"#
%%,
%-"$(",
#
" &"% "#"4(
#,
#
,
(
3 #
#-
mrrnexyyb[\ez{|ez^\dyb[nyenb[_bey
< &
'&

!
!"

!

$%%&'())*+,'-./'-0,1)*+&)'&*+2*')3456

!
!"

!
8

!

9:;<=

$%%&'())*+,'-./'-0,1)*+&)'&*+2*')?45@

#

!
!"
!
A

!

9:;<=

$%%&'())*+,'-./'-0,1)*+&)'&*+2*')B4

!
!"

C
D
8

EFGEGHIJ

$%%&'())*+,'-./'-0,1)*+&)'&*+2*')K43?

!
!"
D L

C

!

9:;<=

$%%&'())*+,'-./'-0,1)*+&)'&*+2*')5K3B

!
!"

M
C

C

#

!

9:;<=

$%%&'())*+,'-./'-0,1)*+&)'&*+2*')6N@B

!
O C
C

#

!

9:;<=

$%%&'())*+,'-./'-0,1)*+&)'&*+2*')5N64
!

!"#$
%
"&#

%
'
(
!')
%!*
)$%
+)""
%
*!)
),-
./012324567897:7;54<=>.3:?@
ABC)""!',"'
)
"&%
D! &(
##
(!

$
EF</7GHI128029H128J0;0K72EJ072J781;1E7;E" )!'LM %!
)" )$!#
%
)
%
M% "#!'
$
'
,!%)'%

%
)"'
((M%%! &!
NOP+&%!)(
##Q'RD!(
-
M%
%
S
(!
%'
('T" )""*
,

!)
!$!
)"'D"%%" ! &'

(!"#"
!
,
("M'

-"%
"
"&#
QU168128V46872W1967X<4;7J;042.J;
%
LM!%
+
'+"-"

#-R@

Y
&%"
'
%
*!)
)T
#
"'
#

P("%
$M##-"
'M%*
-
$$
%Q! )!("
),-
,#"(P*
%!("##!
R" )$
%

Z!'
(

$
[
)""[! )!("
%Q"%
)

%!\
"##!
R@A!&'M%*
-
$$
%!'
P
-(
+

@]$
'M%*
-
$$
%!'!&T

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
'(
%
(" ,
*!
D
)"'+
%

)

)",#
@] (
%"'T"#
D'M%*
-
$$
%#!

%
)""#!
Q%
)
%!\
"#R+
" '"#"(P
$)""" )T
%
$
%
T"#"(P
$(
%"! -",
M
%
'
(

$

(!
'@!'#!'!'

%$
(^!!''!+
#-"'"%! &

! $
%!)
!$-! &D",!%)'"*

!"#
,
! -
M%
%
S
("%
"TD

-+!&,

%
T
" )!$
-+!&,
,%

)! &QD!(+
" '
''+!&,

%
'
R@
#!'" )"''
(!"
)! $
%+"!

#
-
MP
DD"
#

P$
%
(
$!%+
%
'
(

" )
#
'&M!)
-
M! P
D! &D

!+
#
+
"*
!)" (
" )+! !+!\"!
+
"'M%
'

#!+! "

%%
)M(

!"#!+
"('$%
+-
M%
%
S
(
"(!*!!
'
%&

"

%!"

%+!''
M#)
%
'
(
,
(
$!%+
)@
_`
a` b`b
'

D"
"%
$"
"%!(M#"%,!%)c'%" &
-
M%
%
S
("%
"$"##'D!! Q!@
@,%

)! &TD!
%! &T+!&%"! &T
%%
'!)
RT-
M+"-LM
%--
M%#
("!
M'! &

d.efg446" )*!
D
%" &
+"
'
%
*!)
)$
%,!%)'! -
M%"%
""
,

+
$

%
$!#
'
%
*!)
)$
%
"(,!%)! -
M%%
'M#'@]$"
"&#

-
M%
]h"i+!&%"
%-,!%)'

(!
'#!'"'",%

)! &'
"'
"''
(!"
)D!!Q! )!("
),--
##
D*
%!("#,"%'

#
&-&%"
! -
M%j]h"i
hkYlAl]m]nYohkpqpCipqrssAknt"

$-
M%%
'M#'#!'RT
%
+"-,

''
%
'
"'
+

! D!!
!+
$%"+
'

(!$!
)@]$
[l%

)'
#'
D
%
[!'! )!("
)T

,!%)#!P
#-)

'
,%

)! -
M%
%
S
("%
"@

u
p"(&%

,"%%

%
'
'
,!%)c'%
#"!*

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
!
NOP+&%!)(
##Q'R-
M%
%
S
(
*
%#"
')M%! &"
"%!(M#"%D

P
$
-
"%@A
"##
%,"%! )!("
'"!&
%
%
,",!#!-
$'

(!
'
%
'
(
@
'M%*
-
$$
%(" ,
M'
)

'",#!'"#
*
#
$(
$!)
(
!

%
'
(
'(
%
@
vwxyz{|}~wyy{w~}z}
}zw}{}|}{yw
yzw
}y
{|}}z{}~z

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
$
%
"(D

P!'("#(M#"
)"'
M+,
%
$'M%*
-
*
'!
D

PD
%

'

(!
'D"')

(
))!*!)
),-

"#
M+,
%
$'M%*
-
*
'$
%"D

P@o
%
Z"+
#
T!$! D

PN
%
D
%
O'M%*
-
*
'" )
q

)
D

D"'$
M )!
$
+T

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(

$
q

)
D

! D

PN!'O@@

%

%#-
%
'

"
%
$
%
'
(
"(%
''
-
"%T
%
#"!*

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
!'("#(M#"
)@!'!'

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
)!*!)
),-

+"Z!+M+
%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
"(%
''"##D

P'@o
%
Z"+
#
T!+"&!

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
! D

PO$
%
q

)
D

!'O@OT" )
"

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
"D

PNQO@R!'
+"Z!+M+
$" -D

P
$
-
"%@
%
#"!*

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(

D

PN!'O@O@N^
"D

PO!!'O@OO@O@@

%
#"!*

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
("#(M#"
)!

%
*!
M''

M )
%&

'"'"!'!("#(
*
%'!
'
""##

''!,#
*"#M
'$"##,
D

O" )NOT
! (#M'!*
@!'!'

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
'(
%
@

n
##
D,"%')

"*
%-#!,
%"#
'!+"

$
!+
$%"+
! '!)
D!(
,!%),%

)'"(%
''!'
!%
%" &
@]$
%
"%

-
##
D,"%''
D $
%",!%)T
!)

'
,%

)! -
M%
%
S
("%
"@

%!("#,#"(P#!
''M

%!+

'
)

%
,",!#!-
$
%
'
(
,"%'! )!("

M+,
%
$'M%*
-'

%$
%+
)$
%"'

(!
'!
NOP+&%!)(
##Q'R-
M%

%
S
("%
"
*
%#"
'@

l"#)" )
#)
p"&#
'"%

%

(
)M )
%
l"#)" )
#)
p"&#
h%

(!
A(" )
s!&%"
%-l!%)%
"-A(QslAR@
A -

%'

%
%&" !\"!
D

#" '
%(
)M('"(!*!!
'"+"-%
'M#! !+
"('
l"#)
%
#)
p"&#
'T
%
!%
''T'
M#)
$
##
D"

%!"
%
&M#"!
'" )!+
#
+
%
LM!%
)"*
!)" (
" )+! !+!\"!
+
"'M%
'T"')
'(%!,
)!
*"%!
M'#! P'
!'

"&
@

81;1! !'#
("!
! )!("
'"

"&#
'"*
,

,'
%*
)! !'"%
"@!')

'
+
"
"&#
'"%

%
'
! -
M%

%
S
("%
"T
'

(!"##-!$
"%
"!')!$$!(M#
'M%*
-@h#
"'
%
*!
D
cq

'
"P

C
k
'M#'A%
k
M%
)c'
(!

$

F6772;16e24<1;04242 09<1;4<GU0<8E128W1967E84JF72; )

%+!
!$-
M%
%
S
(!'! "

%#-'M%*
-
)"%
"@]$!!'T-
M
+"-

)
%
#-

%%
'
M%(
'
)

%+!
!$
"&#
'+"-,

%
'
Q
@&@-
M%#
("#oq$!
#)
$$!(
T'"
'M%*
-'T-
M%
D
'M%*
-'R@
A))!!
"#! $
%+"!
(" ,
$
M )M'! &
$
##
D! &#! P'¡
p"&#
s" "&
+
¢;;E£¤¤555¥5E¥94/¤<49<1¤71967¦1219772;
s
"'M%
'$
%"*
!)! &" )+! !+!\! &!+
"('
,!%)'¢;;E£¤¤555¥5E¥94/¤60I<1<G¤J4667J;042E¤1/408029¦128¦0200K029¦02J0872;16¦ ;1=7¦09<1;4<G¦I0<8E
C"!
D!)
"*
!)" (
" )+! !+!\"!
+
"'M%
'$
%,!%)'¢;;E£¤¤555¥5E¥94/¤E0;7E¤871F6;¤067E¤84JF72;E¤21;0425087¦E;1281<8¦ J42E7</1;042¦71EF<7E¥8
qM

#
+
"#] $
%+"!
$
%s!&%"
%-l!%)'" )p"&#
'! ]h"i¢;;E£¤¤555¥5E¥94/¤7801¤EF6772;16¦024<1;042¦09<1;4<G¦ I0<8E¦128¦I168¦128¦946872¦71967E¦1G¦4JJF<¦<4§7J;¦1J;042 ¨ ©

"
" #$

"

%

"
"

&
'%(

" %% )

*

*
""

" *"
)%

%

"%

(

+ ,,-.- /0
1+
2 3
24+
4 0-5
67
8 /0,
9
:; <=

>

"
% ?@ABCDEFDGFHAG)%"
I@ABCDEJDGCHAKLM@DGJDGFHAGNIJJO)
(
P%"% &

%(

" ""*

(
P%
Q

)%
"((
%
"R% ( % ""
*

(
P%"% *("

SLM@DGT@BHLKD@BLGFHLGBU@G@U@VLM@DGUHLCWAHCEDA?@ABC

%)

(
P%X(%%

%
R

"YHLCWAHCEDALKD@B@GZLGB
U@G@U@V@GZ@U[LFMCMD?@ABC

*

%%

"*"
\2,]-+
4 0-5
6^
,0
,_// 0 26`-
810
:
(
P%
(
"

)
" *%("

"

%

(% *(
a
"% "bc!"
%)

)

d;"

eW[[fHUHGMLfgGEDAULM@DGDGY@ZALMDAhI@ABCLGBiLZfHCBDFWUHGM) "((
(
"
(

(

(%
"% )
%"

%

" %%

b

%
%

" %

("

%
R

%( %

*

")
j;
* *";
%!
j*"

*

""*(

*

(
P%

k
l0mn_o, &
bp*"(

(

"

%
>qrrs:tu!r!vt
&
=

>

&
%a=>&d(

*
a%"
"")% (
)"")

)

(
d(
%

(%
(

R *
s(
:

w!b

c"
"!

%a!

%d
#&
Y@ZALMDAhI@ABCxAHLMhyFM#z#{
|&
ILfBLGB}DfBHGiLZfH~ADMHFM@DGyFM#z$

"
% *

"""
r "= MM[CTTTETCZDK[ADZALUHLZfH

ULGLZHUHGM
=

R( %*

MM[CTTTETCZDKf@?ALAhFDffHFM@DGCLKD@B@GZ
LGB
U@G@U@V@GZ
@GF@BHGMLf

MLH
U@ZALMDAh
?@ABC
t

%
R

*

!((" ":

=

>

r ":; <MM[CTTTETCZDKUHB@LCW[[fHUHGMLf
@GEDAULM@DG
U@ZALMDAh

?@ABC
LGB
?LfB
LGB
ZDfBHG
HLZfHC
ULh
DFFWA
[ADHFM
LFM@DG

t=r ""Q*

!" (

&
>

<%
a><<d

% "w!

"
MM[CHFDCETCZDKHF[C[HF@HC
>

b*#"#
>"
!

!(

;
%"
%
*"

&
>

<%
a><<d"(
%"
>

q
a><qd
% "w!
MM[CHFDCETCZDKHF[C[HF@HC
>

(
##
>" %v
% %

Q (* %

&
>

<%
a><<d

% "w!

"
MM[CHFDCETCZDKHF[C[HF@HC
>

(
#v%#
>" %!
q%
(

&
>

<%
a><<d

% "w!

"
MM[CHFDCETCZDKHF[C[HF@HC
>

= |$!(#

!"#$$%&'"()*"(+',$%&!$"!%&-%"$../.
012
13

4

5
4

12
12
56 7
8

9

9

:;1
0;2

:1
0>1

?
4 4

01
0>1

5<8
4

01

>1

44@

<

9

9

!"#$$%&'"()*"(+',$%&!$"!%&-%"$AB.C
:
;3
0>1
D

9

9

!"#$$%&'"()*"(+',$%&!$"!%&-%"$.EFG

2

2
H45<=4

:12

>1
=5<

!"#$$%&'"()*"(+',$%&!$"!%&-%"$ICFC
:;3
;3
:8<
= 4

!"#$$%&'"()*"(+',$%&!$"!%&-%"$IC.G

J
H

9

9

!"#$$%&'"()*"(+',$%&!$"!%&-%"$.KEB

1
12
J

5LM
8

9

9

!"#$$%&'"()*"(+',$%&!$"!%&-%"$ICGB

1
0;3

!"#"$%&!'$()*#&%+)$)$,+-*&%)*./+*01&$02&-!"1
3

456

7

8
9
:

;
<=
7

>?@ABACDCEF@G>?HIHJKHLM
N

O

L M

L5 PRST

M5

W

X
P

4
Y
3
PR
RQ Z

[
3

PR QR[
R

3

4
Y
3

RQ
Z

QQ[3

PRLQR[M Y

PR QR[\QR[]P^
RQ QQ[\QR[]QR
_

QPQ3

3

`?HHaCJbcHBI@JLM
:

T

8

3

cd?eHFfGG@?ELM
U
<

<
g

g
L<ggM

9Z5
5
h%% 1ijj"k)1l(m1l-)nj"k j1 "k+"1jopqp
< ;P[
r
P[
U
T 4
g

<
g

g
L<ggM

9Z5
5
h%% 1ijj"k)1l(m1l-)nj"k j1 "k+"1jsotu
< ;RQ
5_P
Z<
Z
Z

;

<
g

g
L<ggM

<g

=

L<g= M

9Z5
h%% 1ijj"k)1l(m1l-)nj"k j1 "k+"1jqqts
< ;P
Z[
Z
T

w

<
g

g
L<ggM

9Z5
5
h%% 1ijj"k)1l(m1l-)nj"k j1 "k+"1jouxy
<

z {

<
g

g
L<ggM

9Z5
5
h%% 1ijj"k)1l(m1l-)nj"k j1 "k+"1jp|us
< rP
5_P
z {

w

<
g

g
L<ggM

9Z5
5
< 5RP
5R[
z

<
g

g
L<ggM

9Z5
5
<

zg
<
g

g
L<ggM

9Z5
5
< ;P[
5PQ

!!"#

%&'()(
*+

,-./0123405.(40 6

* +

6789:86;*<=8> ?*@*7@ ?*A;B<;BC*BD687 E9
<E F89
*
$G
>99@
+
9E<
>
$6

6 +
>99H>9@
>E

>99@
+
9E<
>6

>99@
+
9E<
>6+

>99@
+
9E<
>

>99@
+
9E<
> $9
>99@
+
9E<
>$E

>99H>9@
9
D
>99@
+
9E<
9

>99@
+
9E<
9 $D

>99@
+
9E<
9A
+
>99H>9@
6789:86;*<=8> ?*@*7@ ?*A;B<;BC*BD687 E9
<E F89
8

>99H>9@
G

$D
>99@
+
9E<
C+

$D

>99@
+
9E<
?
D+
>99@
+
9E<
<
G

>99H>9@
<$I

>99H>9@
E

>99@
+
9E<
E

H
=

>99@
+
9E<
6> 6
6 +
>99H>9@
6 H
F+

>99@
+
9E<
I

D

>99@
+
9E99@
+
9E<
6789:86;*<=8> ?*@*7@ ?*A;B<;BC*BD687 E9
<E F89

!"! !#
!$
$%"!&!

!#&"
$
'
( $)
*+,-./0-1234.-1+/5267-/-8-9+,-./72+:;<2:=.<>-<1:?@A?B ?C?D
@

DE
FG

B
BHBE
@?G
A?

IG@
G
I
J
GC
KD
A?B
IAA

D

L
MI

DG@
G
?GM

I
@F
??

D?C@G
?G
GMDBG?MM@F
I?
GB
BHBE
@?KNG?
D
A?
BG?OIGG@@C

A
IGCEGP@

LF
DQGA
AIGMQ?
@RCBB
IK311-,-./+S
82+:;<2:GT2<8-,:B
IA
F?
AE

G
DIEGM
@FIIGC
@G
C@

DIEGM
M
?C@CGA?E@?E?
G
IGC
EGP@?K
UV
$%WX
$
'!

V$
Y'
( $
V
&
!
(""
!($&"Y "
!Z
ND[

GI ?GC@\??@GBE?GM>-<1:.=]./:2<4+,-./]./52</^>]]_

GD?E@?D
B
I

?E@

G

IGCEGP@
G@
G
L?C@D
?DG??C
D`

RE@?a@GD>+S1+/1b.S12/c+dS2e<.,25,-./35,

DG??E@?B
O
?fgC

AhK
RDiajfD

DF?GM@G
@
MGB

GIA?khMGBG
MGB
G
G
DF?GM@G
@
@GF
DlQ
B

GIA?E@?
?K
NDB

GIA?

MGIGCEGP@?FMGB

EGFAID34-+/m/.0S21d2*2,0.<n^3m*_KNDao
?A
?G

@G@G
GM:;<42pqr+/1-/dq+/15-,-92/:5-2/521+,+:2,:

?sC

MGC

?GMDG?A?EG
?G@@C

DtuOB

@?
D
D@DIGCEGP@
?@?KND??E@?D
FA

M
?

?E@

G
A@
C?DI
?E@?
D

>+S1+/1b.S12/c+dS2e<.,25,-./35,sCB
?B
I
EEILG
?E@?D
D
?
E
@C
FC

AIGGMM?DG
@F?G
FGEB
K
a

LD[

GI ?GC@?
@C?G
I
?CA?GMA?D
B
IG@@C
IGCEGP@

Kl?
GE?

FGM
A?D
B
IG@@C

IGCEGP@

KNG

?GM
A?EG

IE?

IGCEGP@

L

GFMI?CFIMMG
D

G?C?E?
LE
?F?Dv+T-1
34-+/w/=.<8+,-./x.5+,.<^v3wx_y..SK
UV($
$&"$$Vz!'
&!($
Z
RCA?E@?EGM?

@CG
D?GM?E@?E?

IGCEGP@

A@
C?GA?F
G
?
DaoMG
V$&"$
A

@KlM
D?E@?
E?
LD
B

?D
D?CA?E@?B
I
?GAE?
KlM
?CA?E@??DG
?CEG
IGC?LIGCB
I
GIG
GD
?GC@?GB
MD
?CA?E@?B
IAE?
K
KIGCG@
iRMGMM@L?
?CFI?LIGCG

?CFI?K
UV
$%WX
$
'!

V&
(Y&$!"'&V$Y
V'
( $&
!
(""
!'!($&"Y "
!Z
NDEGA
AIGME?
@

ED?
??G@

DIGCB

GIA?
A
?G

EGFAID34-+/m/.0S21d2*2,0.<n^3m*_KND?

?
FMGB

G

@G@G
GM:;<42pqr+/1-/dq+/15-,-92/:5-2/521+,+:2,:K
QGA
AIGME?
@

?@G

CGC?IA

CE

?

A
MGB
G
A@GB?
F

AKNG

BG
AGCDG
DEGA
AIGM
E?
@

ED?
EGC@

DG
G
EDBL
GGDQGA
AIGMQ?
@RCBB
I

D
@@OG
D{NB
AGCD?

ED?{

OK
|z %}!zY $ !'~z!
!'~'
!'!(Z
NG?
D
E
GM
E
@C
A?

IGCEGP@

M
?
D
KKA

LG?
LIGCB
IsCIIGCG@
G
C?

Dv3wxy..S

F
D

B
E?EGFMGA?
IGC

DAGGBGMDEGM?EGFMG
@DA
IGC?C?KlM
AG
IGC
lQ
B

GIA?E@??D
?
A

?
?G

??G@

D
@
AIIG
F@
A
?G
DED
GG
I

ED
IGCflQ

Q al\lNiQ `R``R[[a h
DGEGMIGC?C??LDB
IA
??E?

?GBEG

D
DBM
B?E@MKlM
{??
D{?
@
LD
DAOIG?
GA
IGCEGP@

K
UV

V
$Y"!"!Y'
( $Z
[

GIA?FDGC
DlQ
M

GDMGG

?
@@

G?GM@G
@

tK{

{A?
>-<1:.=]./:2<4+,-./]./52</D

GM@G
@
DGC
DGCD

I
D
D
DRa
@C

LDQ
@M@l?

?LQCG @GL

Dg

l?

K{J {A?
?D

GM@G
@
G
I
E
@C
G
?F
G

G
? ?
D@G

Ra

K{G
JJgC

A{A?

G?E@?
IGCEGP@

LAC
EE
G
IGC?DA@
C?GMD>+S1+/1b.S12/c+dS2e<.,25,-./
35,sCB
?MG

?GMG
G
J

?EG

?C?@EA?
GMM?DG

?MGB@

IE?GMFGEB
G
@F?K
KGMM?DG

IFGEB
GG

M?D

K
aDGC
D?BEG

G
FG

B
BHBE
@?G
A?LMMG??DGCAB
L
E
@C
LG
FG

B
BHBE
@?GDA?G
D?
?L?E@
I?E@?KiGBG
MGB
G
G

FG

B
BH
G
B
?C?IGC@

BEB
GDE
FG

B
BHB

GIA
BE
@?LE
??DiajfNBBG
AGC
FG

B
BH
G
B
?C?l@

BEB
G
FGGB
BHBE
@?GB

GIA?hK

$

$
V
&
!
(YY"
(YY$V&"
$
iG
G

?
AGCD
FG@@C
@

@GMAGD
FC
A?E@?

GCE?GMA?E@?
D
IGCEGP@

GMMD
a

@G
?LE
?F?D*.<,2+:,52+/+,+e.<,+SKNDQG

?GGMM?

MGB
G

AGCGD

A??A?D
B
IADEMC
GIGC
IGCEGP@F
Ka

ILIGCB
IG

G
DABG?C?M?C
I

DEG
B
E?DGC
DD*33*]]w/,2d<+,-42
,+,-:,-5+S7.12S-/d+/1e<21-5,-427+TT-/d.=7+<-/2>-<1-:,<-r;,-./:+/13r;/1+/52./,23,S+/,-5;,2<]./,-/2/,+S2S=EGP@ AE

!"!"
!
#
!"

$%
&'(
"
!$
!
#
!
#%

'
"'")
"

$
*

$ !!
""!
%
"!#
"#
"*

!

"

$%
&'(% !!+,-./
!012$!
"

!%
"

''$""
!%'#
'
".)1 !
*!%
%
3!.%

#%!"'.
#
!*"456' 7!8

3 %

$%
&'9"

$:'%
&'#

%");"%!%
3(% !

6'#$
!$3
##
7"'

'63'
"8"#
:!"'
#."
."'
7
<
" "8),!$3
##
!6
'
%
"")0#!$3
##
!("
%

#%!"'!'
'"
3*!
%"
)0"'
"!(
*!$3
##

"

"! '6
#"(#
(
'6
#'"

$%!"'
#!%'!)! !
!"
%!"
!%!""

$%
&')0!!%
!"%
"#
"#
"
*
!
#'
"'"3%
"

"

$%
&'(*"

("#

"7*'"!"!!

%!"8) !"!!
'"#

" %

$6"
**

6#

'
"#%!"'" %!$% "
"
#3
"'"
"<
"!$!
"
$'%
" %'!#

$%
&''3!(!
$ %!"'
'
"#)
"

$3
"'
""<
"!$!(3!+,-.

$3
"'""<
"!$!0'"% "
3

"<%'!

!.)
= >
?
@A
>

B'"
%!"!
C! 3%

#%!"'"456' 7!8

$%
&'
3 %!$"%'$ *6
#
),

"'!%

#!%'!%!"')!$3
##
'"
$!
!
! 3
#'
"#"'"%!"'!'
)
DEFGHIJKLMENONGPGIQERLMKHKSTKHTEMKTOPTUPOIKVWXJKTOPTUPOIGESGHVESKGSIJMKKHIKLHY %

#%!"'#
'*6!' '$ !"$

#!$3
3"!"*6*!%'!*!'3

"$

#!$3
3"!#
*6)+
:% (#"*64Z*Z5!$3
3"!"[%

**!#
$""\
#(
%

#%!"'
#[%

*"*64Z!5)Z\)

%
%
%!"%"
#%!"''
!!
( 3%

#%!"'!' '$ )!!%

#%!"'3

:$%

#%!"''
!! *6!)+
:% ("%

#%!"'"*6Z5#
[%

*!5)5\("
%

#%!"'*64Z75)Z\8!:$
#"
*6
#
) 3%

#%!"'
"*64Z!5)Z\]5)Z\^49
*6Z5!5)5\]5)Z\^5)Z)
3%

#%!"'' '$ "%3
$!!%$"
!!!' '
"3!
"!
%
!!
3 $!#
*"5"45(
"' $!3)!!%

#%!"'!'
)
_
`

ab
c
*
!"
3

!
#d#"!*'

!'
!!!"")0#"

*
!!
*"#

(

!"

"

$%
&')
`
ef ab
g'
'6 "!!$%%
!
"%

#%!"'
!"'"$

#!$3
!%#
#
!%'!"456' 7!8

$
%
&'
3 %!)
hi

ab
,*6!6!3""
#*"
!$3
3"!#
*6)
`
ej
[$3
!#

"
!45
!$!"

"!$ 3

#'$"
3""#

"):'%
"
!!!
##, "''
!(
*
$"!
!
"
!
#3
(!"'"!!!'$"
$'
!%!)
,"
'3
%
%
!
" "!"

klmnoplqrnqsqntuvutwxu!
!$!$"
C2
%

y"
"C
'
"$'

z#$)1 !'
"'"3$ z#$!
!'$!!"
{$!
"!
'
"'"!)
0%'!
kr|}umqlps~"
{$'
!

!$
&'
$
"$"['
"5
#2 "/,'(

[]+ !$!)
+

"#

"% !'
"'z$

1

#
'
o~otpxnpuu~n~mnm)

# $

%&&'()(&(*
+# ,
$-
#

.
/

/
!

$

#

.#
$//

/

/.
3

4

5

/

$

/
#

/ 4

/$

%&&678'9*(*
:

/

/

$
2 #

$

0

;

$
<
#

$
3

#

/

$

.
$

$/

/

%&&=>68&9(*
?
.

/

-

#

/?
.

.

#

/

#

#

##

4

#

?
.

APPENDIX D
Cultural and Paleontological Resources Memo
This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources.

MBAKERINT L .COM
3100 Zinfandel Drive , Suite 125,Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574
January 29, 2026
Jonathan Lightfoot, City Planner

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
910 Calle Negocio
San Clemente, CA 92673
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM

FOR THE HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE,

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr. Lightfoot:

In support of the Hanson Hotel CEQA Review Project (project), Michael Baker International completed a South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) records search, literature and historical map review, built environment survey, and buried archaeological site sensitivity analysis to determine if the project area contains historical resources, as defined in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15064.5(a), that may be impacted by the project. Additionally, Michael Baker International requested a paleontological records search from the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC), and completed an online and published database review to identify paleontological localities and sensitivity of the project area.

The project is subject to CEQA review; the City of San Clemente (City) is the lead agency. Methods, results, and recommendations are summarized below.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project proposes development of the Hanson Hotel, a three-story, 61-room boutique hotel featuring a pool, café, rooftop restaurant with amplified music, and a subterranean parking garage with 104 parking stalls. The project includes 16 affordable hotel rooms (25 percent) to enhance low-cost, visitor-serving opportunities and is designed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style to align with the Architectural Overlay and the North Beach Historic District's character.

Discretionary Design Review is currently in process with the City of San Clemente, in order to ensure that the project does not have an adverse effect on the North Beach Historic District, or, with mitigation, will mitigate the effects to a less than significant level if they exist.

HOTEL DEVELOPMENT
The proposed Hanson Hotel includes 61 rooms, a 3,380-square-foot rooftop restaurant and bar, a 1,357-square-foot indoor café, a 290-square-foot walkup café, a hotel guest-only pool and restaurant, and a 47,275-square-foot, two-level subterranean parking garage with 104 parking spaces. The rooftop restaurant would offer full-service alcohol and ambient amplified music.

Public amenities include a scenic terrace at the entry stairs, walkup and seated café services, and landscaping, while the pool and poolside bar remain exclusively available to hotel guests. Overall,

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 2 ends

the total building area (including hotel space, amenities, and garage space) would be approximately 77,308 square feet.

OUTDOOR RESTAURANT SEATING
The project includes outdoor dining at the rooftop restaurant, ground-level café, and walkup café.

Seating is strategically placed to avoid obstructing view corridors and public accessways, particularly along East Avenida Pico. The low-profile furnishings, landscape buffers, and lighting of the restaurant are compatible with the neighborhood. This amenity aligns with the City’s goals for creating inviting public spaces in the North Beach area.

ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS
The project’s design reflects traditional Spanish Colonial Revival architecture and integrates publicly accessible features such as native landscaped gardens, pedestrian areas, and ocean-view terraces.

The Hanson Hotel is located within the Architectural Overlay District (A-Overlay), which mandates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. Drawing inspiration from Ole Hanson’s vision for North Beach as a hub of recreation and entertainment, the project applicant designed the project to be visually compatible with the North Beach Historic District and adjacent historic resources.

Specifically, the architecture incorporates tiered massing, with one- and two-story elements stepping down toward East Avenida Pico and recessed upper levels along North El Camino Real.

A prominent turret element at the corner of North El Camino Real and East Avenida Pico anchors the site to create a distinctive visual gateway element into the North Beach area and pays tribute to a similar feature at the Ole Hanson Beach Club. The proposed hotel would have a maximum (average) building height of 45 feet.

The project's layout incorporates courtyards, shaded patios, arcades, and outdoor gathering spaces, reinforcing the indoor-outdoor theme in traditional Spanish Colonial Revival architecture.

Prominent features include a grand stairway leading to a public podium terrace with ocean views; an Ole Hanson-inspired public art and sculpture area; and a series of vine-covered trellises, fountains, and decorative benches that create a transition from public to semi-private spaces. An overall natural color palette of terra cotta, olive green, red, and white, signature of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, would be used.

LANDSCAPING
The proposed landscape plan features a diverse palette of California native and drought-tolerant plant species, strategically arranged in a series of terraced gardens along East Avenida Pico and North El Camino Real. Specific areas of focus include native planting beds at the site’s corner gateway, a cultural sculpture area, and decorative plantings framing the publicly accessible walkways and terraces.

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 3 ends

Additionally, a total of 19 street trees (including date palms [Phoenix Dactalifera], New Zealand Christmas tree Pohutukawa [Metrosideros Excelsa], and Sanguinello blood orange [Citrus x sinensis]) would be planted along North El Camino Real and Avenida Pico within the public rightof-way (off-site) as a part of the project. Specifically, water-conserving and native plants and highefficiency irrigation would be used in the majority of the proposed landscape areas.

ACCESS AND CIRCULATION
Vehicular Access
Vehicular access to the proposed two-level subterranean garage would be provided via a full access driveway from El Camino Real. An additional garage egress is provided in the northeastern corner of the site.

Emergency Access
Along the project site frontage at El Camino Real, a proposed 10-foot by 50-foot turnout area would allow for emergency vehicle access. Existing and proposed fire access hose pull are located along project parameters. Additionally, fire access ladders are proposed to be placed on the roof for emergency access.

Pedestrian Access
Sidewalks along southbound East Avenida Pico and eastbound North El Camino Real would be constructed at the eastern and southern boundaries of the site, respectively. Pedestrian access is proposed in the southeastern and southwestern portions of the site along East Avenida Pico and North El Camino Real, respectively. Additionally, pedestrian pathways are proposed throughout the site to provide connectivity between hotel buildings and amenities, as well as to existing surrounding pedestrian facilities. The proposed public café would be fronting North El Camino Real and fully accessible by pedestrians. An elevator is proposed in the northwest corner of the site.

Parking
The proposed development includes a two-level subterranean parking garage with a total of 104 parking spaces provided for employees, hotel guests, and retail uses. A total of 43 spaces would be provided on level 1 of the subterranean parking garage and 61 spaces would be provided on level 2. In addition, the project includes an at-grade loading and service space protected by the public sidewalk and median along North El Camino Real to accommodate large delivery and waste collection vehicles that are too large to access the subterranean garage.

Parking spaces would feature Americans with Disabilities Act compliant parking spaces, vanpool accessible spaces, and electric vehicle charging spaces, in accordance with the latest City and California Green Building Code Standards (CALGreen) requirements. Bicycle parking spaces are also proposed in the northeastern corner of the site.

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 4 ends

LIGHTING
Exterior lighting is proposed on-site at building entrances, parking areas, amenity spaces, and pedestrian walkways for security and wayfinding purposes. Lighting would also be used to illuminate architectural elements, signage, and landscape features for ambience. All lighting would comply with current energy standards, utilizing light-emitting diode or efficient fluorescent lighting technology. Project lighting would be shielded and directed away from adjoining properties in accordance with City standards. Specifically, site lighting would be designed to Dark Sky requirements in regard to the shielding of light, limiting light trespass, utilizing energyefficient lighting, and adhering to color temperature limits. Site photometric and lighting specifications would be submitted for review as part of the City’s Building Department review.

Overall, the project would design the proposed hotel to industry best practice as outlined in California Title 24, which includes CALGreen (Title 24, Part 11), as well as in the International Dark Sky Association guidelines and requirements, to reduce light pollution and protect night sky and night habitat.

UTILITIES
Municipal and private utility services necessary to serve the project are currently available within or adjacent to the project site. The site has utility services adjacent to the site from San Diego Gas & Electric (gas and electricity), the Municipal Water District of Orange County (water), the City of San Clemente (sewer), and CR&R (solid waste services). On-site utility infrastructure necessary to serve the project, including water, sanitary sewer, drainage, stormwater runoff treatment facilities, and dry utilities, would be installed with the proposed development and would connect to the existing utilities under public streets. The site would also have available safety and emergency response resources available from Orange County’s police and fire departments.

PROJECT SITE
Regionally, the project site is located in the western portion of the City in southern Orange County. The City is bordered by the City of Dana Point to the northwest, the City of San Juan Capistrano to the north, the City of Rancho Mission Viejo to the northeast, Cleveland National Forest to the east, the vast Camp Pendleton military base to the south, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. Regional access to the general area is provided via Interstate 5.

Locally, the project site is located at 1801 North El Camino Real (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 057-191-60) to the northwest of the intersection of North El Camino Real and East Avenida Pico.

Local access to the site is provided via North El Camino Real and East Avenida Pico. The project site is bound by an existing channel to the north, an existing retail building to the west, East Avenida Pico to the east, and North El Camino Real to the south. This includes the maximum

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 5 ends

extent of ground disturbance and project activities associated with demolition, site preparation, and construction.

The project area is mapped within the Dana Point, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map Township 8 South, Range 7 West, Section 32 (see Attachment 1) and is located approximately 150 feet south of the Desecha Segunda Canada stream, and approximately 0.25 miles east of the Pacific Ocean.

GEOLOGIC SETTING
California is divided into 11 geomorphic provinces, each defined by unique geologic and geomorphic characteristics. The project area is in the west-central portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province, which is marked by northwest-trending mountain ranges and valleys subparallel to the San Andreas Fault. This geomorphic province also includes physiogeographic features such as the Los Angeles Basin, the southern members of the Channel Islands, and the continental shelf (CGS 2002). The Peninsular Ranges province crosses several counties, as well as Baja California, and is bound by the Pacific Ocean to the west, the Transverse Ranges geomorphic province to the north, and the Colorado Desert geomorphic province to the east. The Peninsular Ranges are dominated by the Peninsular Ranges batholith (Prothero 2017).

The project area is located north of San Clemente State Beach and south of Doheny State Beach and is within the Diegan Coastal Terraces ecoregion of California (Griffith et al. 2016). Ecoregions denote general similarity in ecosystems and environmental resources. This region consists of nearly level to gently sloping marine terraces and a narrow strip of beach and dune along the coast. Climate in this region is influenced by the Pacific Ocean with thermic soil temperatures and xeric soil moisture. Although much of this ecoregion has been modified by urban and residential development, vegetation present is mostly California sage scrub, with maritime succulent, Diegan coastal sage scrub, and chapparal communities, and occasionally includes California sagebrush, California buckwheat, black sage, ceanothus, coast live oak, and annual grasslands.

The geology of the San Clemente area was mapped by Kennedy et al. (2007) and Bedrossian et al. (2012) at a scale of 1:100,000. These maps were reviewed to determine the surficial and potential near-surface geology of the project area. According to the map by Kennedy et al. (2007), the project site is directly underlain by young alluvial floodplain deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene), which consists of silty sand and mud deposits on flat plains deposited during flood events. These units are generally too young to produce fossils at the surface but do become old enough to produce fossil materials at depths below the surface. These units span the Rancholabrean (11,000– 240,000 years ago) (Bell et al. 2004). Recorded fossils from these deposits include mammoths, mastodons, horses, bison, camels, saber-toothed cats, coyotes, deer, and sloths, as well as smaller animals like rodents, rabbits, birds, reptiles, and fish. As such, these deposits are considered to have high paleontological sensitivity (Jefferson 1991; Miller 1971).

Directly adjacent to the project area, the surface is underlain by Miocene to early Pliocene-age Capistrano Formation bedrock, specifically its siltstone facies (Tcs) (Kennedy et al. 2007). The Miocene Capistrano formation is a well-known fossiliferous sedimentary formation that preserves

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 6 ends

a transitional depositional environment from nearshore marine to deep marine. Its siltstone facies is the younger of its two members and ranges from 4.9 to 5.6 million years old (Ehlig 1979). This member was deposited in a deep marine slope environment, and although it is somewhat less fossiliferous than the Capistrano’s nearshore Oso member, the siltstone member of the Capistrano Formation has been known to produce marine mammal and fish fossils, including an extinct fur seal, baleen whales, and sharks (PBDB n.d.). Although the Capistrano formation is not mapped directly within the project area, it is likely to be encountered at depth below the young alluvial floodplain deposits and has a high paleontological sensitivity at all depths due to its age and the high amount of fossil material that has been found from it. The soil in the project area has been mapped as the 71 percent Sorrento clay loam with 2 to 9 percent slopes and 29 percent Calleguas clay loam with 50 to 75 percent slopes (NRCS n.d.). The Tujunga series are very deep, well-drained soils that formed in alluvium from sedimentary rocks (USDA 2017). The Calleguas series are very shallow, well-drained soils formed on uplands, hills, and mountains in material weathered from sedimentary rocks (USDA 2001).

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION METHODS
The methods and results of the SCCIC records search, literature and historical map search, built environment survey, and buried archaeological site sensitivity analysis are presented below.

SOUTH CENTRAL COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER
Michael Baker International Archaeologist Marc Beherec, PhD, RPA, conducted a records search of the project area and half-mile search radius on January 14, 2026. The SCCIC, as part of the California Historical Resources Information System, California State University at Fullerton, an affiliate of the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), is the official state repository of cultural resources records and reports for Orange County. As part of the records search, the following federal and California inventories were reviewed:
• California Inventory of Historic Resources (OHP 1976) • California Points of Historical Interest (OHP 1992 and updates) • California Historical Landmarks (OHP 1996)
• Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (OHP 2012) for Orange County • Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) for Orange County (OHP 2026) Resource Results
The SCCIC identified no cultural resources within the project area; seven were identified within the

0.5-mile search radius of the project area as described below. The BERD for Orange County identified an additional 22 local, state, and nationally designated resources within 0.5 miles of the project area, which include a mix of residential, commercial, religious, recreational, and educational resource types. Three of the resources (the Spanish Colonial Revival Thematic Historic District, the North Beach Historic District, and the Spanish Village by the Sea Thematic Historic District) are located within the project area. SCCIC records search results are included in Attachment 2.

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 7 ends

TABLE 1. SCCIC RESOURCES WITHIN 0.5 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE Resource Name/
Number Address Type
OHP Status Code/
Eligibility Status
Relationship to
Project Site
P-30-001258 Located on a
bluff
overlooking a
drainage
Prehistoric site
consisting of a
metate fragment, a
large flake scraper,
and a
hammerstone
Unevaluated 0.2 miles
north/northwest
P-30-100074 800 meters
southeast of the
intersection of El
Camino Real and
Camino
Capistrano,
located directly
up the ridge to
the top of the
mesa
Prehistoric site
consisting of a
basalt denticular
flake, five to six
notches created on
one side
Unevaluated 0.42 miles
northwest
P-30-150035 This noncontiguous
district is
primarily located
west of
Interstate 5
between
Avenida Pico on
the north and
Avenida Calafia
on the south
Historic—Spanish
Colonial Revival
Historic District
containing 207
individual
properties
distributed
throughout the
City of San
Clemente
5S3—Appears to be
individually eligible for
local listing or
designation through
survey evaluation.
100 ft south of
the project area
(across North El
Camino Real) is
the closest
district
component
(Aquarium Café;
Ichiburi)
P-30-150036 This noncontiguous
district is
primarily located
west of
Interstate 5
between
Avenida Pico on
the north and
Avenida Calafia
on the south
Historic—Ole
Hanson/Spanish
Village by the Sea
District containing
149 individual
properties
distributed
throughout the
City of San
Clemente
3S—Appears eligible
for listing in NR via
survey evaluation
100 ft south of
the project area
(across North El
Camino Real) is
the closest
district
component
(Aquarium Café;
Ichiburi)

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 8 ends

Resource Name/
Number Address Type
OHP Status Code/
Eligibility Status
Relationship to
Project Site
P-30-1600086 112 Boca de La
Playa
Historic—San
Clemente
Swimming
Club/San
Clemente Beach
Club
1S—Listed in NR as an
individual property; 3D:

Eligible for the NR as a
contributor to a NReligible district

0.05 miles
southwest
P-30-176663 NW end: 388830
mE;3763880 mN;
SE end: 417800
mE/ 3747600
mN
Burlington
Northern Santa Fe
Railway (formerly
Atchison, Topeka,
and Santa Fe
Railway)
6Z—Found ineligible
for the NR, CR, or local
designation through
survey evaluation

0.1 mile west
P-30-177042 1100 Calle
Puente
Max Berg Plaza
Park/Plaza Park
3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to a
NR-eligible district

0.45 miles
south/southeast
NR = National Register of Historic Places; CR = California Register of Historical Resources TABLE 2. ORANGE COUNTY BERD RESULTS WITHIN 0.5 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE OTIS ID Number Address Name [if known]
OHP Status Code/
Eligibility Status
Relationship to
Project Site
530430 N/A Spanish Colonial
Revival Thematic
Historic District
5S2—Eligible for local
listing or designation
in the NR
Within project
site
530248 N/A North Beach
Historic District
1S—Listed in the NR Within project
site
530249 N/A Spanish Village By
the Sea Thematic
District
3S—Appears eligible
as a separate entity
and as a contributor to
a documented district
Within project
site
530436 202 Avenida
Aragon
St. Clements
Episcopal Church
3B— Appears eligible
for listing in the NR
both individually and
as a contributor to a
NR-eligible multicomponent resource
through survey
evaluation

0.47 miles
southeast

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 9 ends

OTIS ID Number Address Name [if known]
OHP Status Code/
Eligibility Status
Relationship to
Project Site
530437 224 Avenida
Aragon
N/A 3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.47 miles
southeast
530328 135 Avenida
Florencia
N/A 5D2—Eligible for local
listing only as a
contributor to a district
that is listed or eligible
under local ordinance

0.32 miles
southeast
530364 130 Avenida
Pelayo
N/A 3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.47 miles
east/southeast
530365 146 Avenida
Pelayo
N/A 3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.45 miles
east/southeast
530097 204 Avenida
Pelayo
N/A 6Z—Found ineligible
for the NR by the
California OHP

0.43 miles
east/southeast
530301 1102 Buena
Vista
N/A 5D2—Eligible for local
listing only as a
contributor to a district
that is listed or eligible
under local ordinance

0.47 miles
south/southeast
530463 1206 Buena
Vista
N/A 3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.42 miles
south/southeast
530484 1209 Buena
Vista
N/A 3B— Appears eligible
for listing in the NR
both individually and
as a contributor to a
NR-eligible multicomponent resource
through survey
evaluation

0.4 miles south
530197 1608 Calle Las
Bolas
Vista Del Mar
Apartments
3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.24 miles
east/southeast

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 10 ends

OTIS ID Number Address Name [if known]
OHP Status Code/
Eligibility Status
Relationship to
Project Site
530198 1638 Calle Las
Bolas
N/A 3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.13 miles
east/southeast
530199 1411 Calle
Mirador
N/A 3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.42 miles
east/southeast
498397 1426 El Camino
Real
San Onofre Inn 2D2—Determined
eligible for NR as a
contributor to a district

0.40 miles east
539225 1533 North El
Camino Real
N/A 3D—Eligible for the NR
as a contributor to an
eligible district through
survey evaluation

0.25 miles east
530228 1700 North El
Camino Real
Miramar
Theater/San
Clemente Theater
1D—Contributor to a
multi-component
resource listed in the
NR by the Keeper

0.08 miles
southeast
696954 1802 North El
Camino Real
7-Eleven 6X—Determined
ineligible for the NR by
the SHRC or the
Keeper

0.04 miles south
530230 1814 North El
Camino Real
Aquarium Café/OC
Fresca
1D—Contributor to a
multi-component
resource listed in the
NR by the Keeper

0.04 miles
south/southwest
696952 1844 North El
Camino Real
Commercial
Building
6X—Determined
ineligible for the NR by
the SHRC or the
Keeper

0.07 miles
southwest
696953 1844 North El
Camino Real
Flowers and
Friends
6X—Determined
ineligible for the NR by
the SHRC or the
Keeper

0.07 miles
southwest
NR = National Register of Historic Places; SHRC = State Historical Resources Commission

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 11 ends

Report Results
Two cultural resources studies have been previously completed that intersect with the project site; a total of 11 have been completed within the half-mile search radius, as identified below. A very small portion of the project site has been previously studied, as the studies adjacent to the project site did not include any of the project site itself. Though resources were identified as part of these studies, the studies covered expansive areas and the resources were found over 0.2 miles away from the project area. However, it is worth noting that one of the reports intersecting the project site mentions that over 414,000 cubic yards of soil was removed from the bluffs area immediately north of the project site in 1992; this would have destroyed any archaeological sites that existed on the surface or nearsurface. The report further suggests that due to the components of CAORA-1258 not far away (a metate fragment, scraper, and hammerstone), it can be understood that some kind of vegetable collection and processing was being done on or near the bluffs (Maxon 1996), which includes the subject project site.

TABLE 3. SCCIC REPORTS WITHIN 0.5 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE Report No. Author(s) Date Title In
Project
Site?
Resources
in Project
Site?
OR-00577 Cameron,
Constance and
Tadlock, W.

Lewis
1974 An Archaeological Survey of the
Reeves Ranch San Clemente,
Orange County, California
Yes No
OR-01064 Brown, Joan C. 1990 Cultural Resources Reconnaissance of Approximately 23 Acres of the
Marblehead Bluffs Project in San
Clemente, Orange County,
California
No No
OR-01322 Becker,
Kenneth M.
1993 Cultural Resources Monitoring of a
Portion of South Coast Water
District, Water Importation
Project/reach 3, Avenida Pico, San
Clemente, Orange County,
California
No No
OR-01459 Maxon, Patrick
O.
1996 Archaeological Reconnaissance and
Impact Assessment of the Proposed
Development of Marblehead
Coastal, San Clemente, California
Yes No
OR-01589 Brown, Joan C. 1997 Cultural Resource Reconnaissance for a Coastal Pedestrian and Bicycle
Path in San Clemente, Orange
County, California
No No
OR-03373 Arrington,
Cindy and
Nancy Sikes
2006 Cultural Resources Final Report of
Monitoring and Findings for the
Qwest Network Construction
No No

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 12 ends

Report No. Author(s) Date Title In
Project
Site?
Resources
in Project
Site?
Project State of California: Volumes
I and Ii
OR-03473 Bonner, Wayne
H.
2007 Cultural Resource Records Search
and Site Visit Results for T-Mobile
Candidate La03597b (Bonito Park),
1304 Calle Valle, San Clemente,
Orange County, California
No No
OR-03639 Bonner, Wayne
H.
2001 Sprint PCS Wireless Facility
og54xc408c, San Clemente Beach
Club, 112 Boca De La Playa, San
Clemente
No No
OR-03886 Garcia, Kyle and
Fatima Clark
2010 Phase I Cultural and Paleontological
Resources Assessment of the
Proposed San Clemente Recycled
Water Project, City of San Clemente,
County of Orange, California
No No
OR-03891 Tang, Bai,
Michael Hogan,
and Mariam
Dahdul
2003 Historic Property Survey Report -
San Clemente Beach Trail Project,
City of San Clemente, Orange
County
No No
OR-03891 Tang, Bai,
Mariam
Dahdul, Josh
Smallwood,
and Laura
Hensley Shaker
2003 Archaeological Survey
Report/Historical Resources
Evaluation Report San Clemente
Beach Trail Project City of San
Clemente, Orange County 12-Ora0-SCLE
No No

LITERATURE AND HISTORICAL MAP REVIEW
Michael Baker International staff reviewed literature and historical maps for historical information about the project area and the vicinity. Below is a list of resources reviewed, followed by a narrative description of the results.

Historical Maps
• Capistrano, California, 1:125,000 scale topographic quadrangle (USGS 1902) • Dana Point, California, 1:62,500 scale topographic quadrangle (USGS 1942) • San Juan Capistrano, California, 1:24,000 scale topographic quadrangle (USGS 1948, rev. 1959)
• Survey Plat Map, Township 8 South, Range 7 West (GLO 1873) • Survey Plat Map, Township 8 South, Range 7 West (GLO 1887)

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
RE: CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE

HANSON HOTEL CEQA REVIEW PROJECT, CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 13 ends

San Clemente City CouncilApril 21, 2026

San Clemente City Council
April 21, 2026