San Dimas City Council
June 11, 2024

Adopt Resolution 2024-46, Approving the 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget Page 3
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
San Dimas Canyon Dip Crossing Design $15,000
Undergrounding Project $250,000
Eliminate Student Union Program $70,950
Reduce supply budget $3,270
Reduce Accela Enhancements $5,000
Total Cuts $378,420
Total reductions $623,420
Based on Council Member comments at the May 28th, 2024 Council meeting, $9,500 of cost for the Planning Commissioners Academy was added back into the budget with the assumption that it will be Councils desire to include that in the budget. This may be removed, and the Resolution amended from an expenditure budget of $63,763,339 to $63,753,839.

Any revenues that may be increased due to approved fee increases will be an amended to the budget at that time of approval, as well as any salary or benefit increases that may result from labor negotiations.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Several years ago, the city projected deficits when considering a conservative estimate of revenues and fully expending operating and capital allocations in approved budgets. Fortunately, for a variety of reasons, the City has avoided incurring significant deficits. This included the unanticipated revenue during the pandemic, which included more than $3 million in pandemic related sales tax, over $8 million in American Recovery Plan Act grant funding, vacancy savings, legal settlements, land purchases, delayed capital projects planned for each fiscal year, and departments not fully expending their appropriate budgets.

While the result of these previous years has allowed the city to not dip into reserves, the reality of the situation is that the projected deficit will be a reality without considering the ongoing demands of current expenditures against revenue. The City’s 5-Year Forecast, which is displayed below projects that starting in 2024-25 and going forward over the subsequent four years, the City’s expenditures will exceed revenues.

While the General Fund possesses adequate reserves to cover this deficit in the upcoming fiscal year, prolonged operational deficits could rapidly deplete the unassigned fund balance over the next few years. Based on the projections in the chart below. The unassigned funds balance would fall below 20% in fiscal year 2027-28 and the total reserve would fall below the desired reserve of 75% in fiscal year 2028-29.

Adopt Resolution 2024-46, Approving the 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget Page 4
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
The proposed 2024-25 budget will also address a number of Capital improvements, replacement vehicles and new equipment which includes the following:

Major Equipment
Tractor & Skip Loader $220,000
150 Gallon Crack Sealer & Compressor $120,000
Toro Dingo Attachments $25,500
Building & Code Enforcement Vehicles $180,000
Public Work Vehicles $80,000
Total Major Equipment $625,500
Capital Projects
Arrow Highway Pavement Rehabilitation $3,750,000
San Dimas Loop Road Repair $3,000,000
Badillo Pavement Rehabilitation $2,295,043
Fifth Street Pavement Rehabilitation $900,000
Cul-de-sac repairs $200,000
Annual Pavement Preservation $444,000
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
2021-22
Actual
2022-23
Actual
2023-24
Revised
Estimates
2024-25
Forecast
2025-26
Forecast
2026-27
Forecast
2027-28
Forecast
2028-29
Forecast
Assigned Fund Balance Unassigned Fund Balance
Desired Operating Reserve Level (75%) Revenue
Expenditures

Adopt Resolution 2024-46, Approving the 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget Page 5
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
Red Steel Pole and Wooden Street Light Replacements $555,000 Charter Oak Existing Wall Extension & Repair $50,000
Roof replacements & City Hall and the Train Depot $480,000 Total Capital Projects $11,647,043

ALTERNATIVES
Council could elect to provide alternative direction to the proposed budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Michael O'Brien
Director of Administrative Services
Attachments:

1. Transmittal Letter, Budget Message, Schedule 1 and Category Budget

2. Resolution 2024-46

Director of Administrative
Services
Michael O’Brien
Director of Community
Development
Luis Torrico
Director of Parks and
Recreation
Scott Wasserman
Director of Public Works
Shari Garwick
245 East Bonita Avenue ∙ San Dimas ∙ California 91773-3002 ∙ (909) 394-6200 ∙ Fax (909) 394-6209  sandimasca.gov City Council
Emmett Badar, Mayor
Ryan A. Vienna, Mayor Pro Tem – District 4
Rachel Bratakos - District 3
Eric Weber - District 1
Eric Nakano - District 2
City Manager Chris Constantin
Assistant City Manager
Brad McKinney
City Attorney
Jeff Malawy
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:

Pursuant to Paragraph E (1), Section 2.24.070 of the San Dimas Municipal Code, it is my pleasure to submit to you the annual operating and capital improvement budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. This budget marks the first year we anticipate ending the fiscal year by utilizing reserves to balance a shortfall between General Fund revenues and expenditures.

As part of the City’s resiliency plan, the budget involves a detailed examination of specific operational budget items and includes reductions in both operational expenditures and budget items that have historically ended fiscal years with unexpended appropriations. The use of reserves is intentional given the current reserve balance and does not impair the City’s fiscal condition.

The City’s 2023 Community Survey highlighted high marks in quality of life and the condition of public infrastructure. Additionally, the survey demonstrated that overall, the City is performing well in its existing programs and services. Thus, the goal of the 2024-25 budget is to maintain overall investments, including funding for addressing homelessness, public safety, and restoring the San Dimas Loop roadway impacted by recent storms.

This budget also continues the focus on program-based budgeting summary statements. The intent of these presentations is to consolidate multiple revenue and expenditure items throughout the budget into one location, providing an easy-to-understand format for the public. We will continue to expand upon these summaries to enhance transparency.

San Dimas is a wonderful city. Staff are attentive to the needs of residents, dedicated to their work, and future-focused to overcome challenges. As City Manager, I am confident we will navigate the inevitable challenges ahead and ensure we remain accountable to our residents.

Respectfully Submitted,
Chris Constantin
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET MESSAGE
The City establishes an annual operating and capital budget reflective of its planned activities. Revenues are projected conservatively, and expenditures reflect a conservative approach by budgeting all positions will be filled, and all non-personnel expenses will be expended. For several years, the City has projected General Fund deficits at the beginning of each fiscal year only to end each year with surpluses due to revenue exceeding projections, planned expenditures not occurring, and capital activity supported by general operations not occurring as planned. The next few years look to be different.

From 2019-20 through 2023-24, the City navigated COVID-19 really well. San Dimas focused on keeping its doors open, providing the highest level of service within the constraints of public health restrictions, and more importantly, was prudent in how it utilized millions in federal pandemic funding. However, due to the federal government’s massive influx of funding to combat impacts of the pandemic, we have seen increases in the cost of many resources supporting our operations – namely, the consumer price index and construction materials costs.
 Consumer price index for Los Angeles increased by 4% in March and April 2023, respectively from the same months in 2022 (US Bureau of Labor Statistics); and  California Construction Cost Index increased 9.4% from December 2022 to December 2023 (Department of General Services).

The increased costs are passed along to the City through contractual escalators in agreements and increased costs for basic operations. Several citywide contracts are due to be rebid after years of stable pricing, and we expect to see significant increases due to years of increases in both the indexes above. The City also retains a healthy General Fund balance. However, the City has been preparing and implementing its fiscal resiliency plan to address challenges ahead.

According to the City’s 2023 community survey, over 75% of residents indicated they trust the City, the City manages its finances well, and the City is responsive to residents’ needs.

Our goals moving forward are to reduce the structural deficit without dramatically impacting how residents feel about the City’s responsiveness to priorities and their confidence in how the City is using valuable tax dollars.

The City remains financially solvent and able to maintain its robust programs and services. In this 2024-25 budget, the budget preparation involved a detailed examination

of specific operational budget items and includes reductions in both operational expenditures and budget items that have historically ended fiscal years with unexpended appropriations. The impact on the public should not be material. Still, we expect to incur an end-of-the-year deficit resulting in the use of reserves. The use of reserves is intentional given the current reserve balance and does not impair the City’s fiscal condition in the short run. However, the City cannot sustain what will be increasing deficits in the subsequent years, and without more meaningful cuts to ongoing expenses or increases in revenue, service impacts will be inevitable.

There are risks ahead the City must keep in the forefront. The economy shows signs of weakness, and any future downturn can put a negative pressure on revenues. For example, the last reported sales tax information shows decreases in receipts in almost every category. The City no longer has federal pandemic funding to plug previously projected budget deficits; as a result, the City’s locally sourced revenue must fully maintain the programs and services provided in the City. The instability worldwide, housing market, increasing price of goods and services cloud the outlook going forward.

In looking at other public entities, you can read numerous reports of deficits resulting in reductions of programs and services, layoffs, and overall negative outlooks. Caution is necessary, but due to the prudent actions of the City over the past decade, we have some time for future uncertainty to become more clear.

Protecting the City’s Most Valuable Service Asset.

City employees are the backbone providing high-quality services to our residents.

Currently, many cities in California are experiencing difficulties in recruiting critical positions. Some cities are offering hiring bonuses, while others are continuing to focus on cost-of-living and work schedule adjustments to maintain competitiveness. These trends are happening in both the private and public sectors and resulting in service degradation.

San Dimas has been fortunate. City employees have been a priority, and this is reflected in the City’s current guiding principles for budget development and budget priorities. On June 8, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution 2021-37 which established an initial set of budget policies, including 12 guiding principles for budget development. These guiding principles include the following:

Reasonable and Sustainable Compensation – Reasonable compensation levels in line with the labor market for similar governmental agencies are desired in order to minimize staff turnover and maintain City productivity.

On June 28, 2022, the Policy was again approved through Resolution 2022-41. On February 8, 2022, the City Council established budget priorities which included the “Retention, investment, and development of City staff.” In 2021, the City allocated annual resources to support professional development, and the City has been committed to supporting competitiveness.

San Dimas remains an employer of choice, and the City has prioritized being competitive.

To this end, the City implemented a comprehensive compensation and classification study after 20 years which resulted in adjusting almost every employee higher in compensation based on a study of 12 comparable cities. In fact, the study placed employees at no less than the median of the group with certain classifications reaching up to the top spots.

While the City’s five-year projection shows annual deficits that will impact our ability to maintain current programs and services, the proposed budget is built to retain existing full time and regular part time employees. Projected annual deficits necessitate careful consideration of any changes which increase ongoing employee costs, a significant component of the overall expenditures. Increasing pension costs, cost of maintaining a higher position against comparable cities with higher levels of tax revenues, and the overall General Fund expenditures whose increases are continuing to pressure our ability to keep current service levels into the future, indicate the City may be limited in what more it can do without meaningful sacrifices somewhere.

Returning to Normalcy and Focusing on the Future
While there are no state mandates for a City to create and approve a budget, the budget has become the de facto standard in articulating a plan for the year and implementing strategic objectives that are multiyear, as in the case of capital improvements.

In the 2022-23 budget, there were several organizational improvements in quality of life, operations, and in how we approach the budgetary decisions which were proposed and are continued into 2023-24. The City is continuing quality of life efforts into 2024-25 which include
 Utilizing a new public safety grant program to enhance efforts to combat quality of life conditions such as excessive graffiti, burglaries, and school zone traffic safety enforcement; and
 Continuing efforts to reduce the impact of homelessness by utilizing services from Los Angeles Center for Drug and Alcohol which help individuals overcome barriers and help place them into housing. Recently, the City passed and continues to propose new ordinances intended to provide more tools to hold accountable, anyone negatively impacting quality of life, including unhoused individuals who continue to refuse housing and services; and
 Reducing the impact of accidents and traffic violations through the continued focus on traffic safety which recently included training and equipping our Community Action Team with Lidar speed enforcement devices, resulting in more deputies enforcing quality of life traffic laws throughout the City; and  Continuing the MySanDimas app to reduce response time, increase

responsiveness and streamline the City’s response to various resident issues such as graffiti, illegal dumping, hazards, code violations, and many other issues.

Some efforts require more thoughtful evaluation, resource investment, and implementation approaches. The City has been proceeding in these areas, but the efforts are multiyear. The efforts include:
 Moving to a more strategic way of thinking in how we address quality of life issues,  Evaluating and adjusting regularly the City’s fees and charges structure to ensure general tax resources are supporting broad community priorities and not resulting in taxpayer subsidies for activities not of a general community benefit,  Creating the right personnel rules to facilitate a competitive workforce, redundancies, and most importantly, a financially sustainable workforce structure,  Stabilizing and smoothing the City’s approach to capital replacement to ensure funding is available at the time a replacement is necessary without resulting in an abnormal impact to current year resources, and
 Aligning community expectations in infrastructure investment to the resources necessary to maintain and improve capital improvements in an efficient and effective manner.

Other changes are ongoing and are never really completed, which include:
 Ensuring accountability in City operations and resource allocation,  Finding ways to leverage technologies, grant opportunities, innovation, and other industry developments to improve how we provide City programs and services which maximize public investment, and
 Adjusting to the substantial new Federal and State mandates impacting our community.

The City has enhanced accountability and resource allocation with the “My San Dimas” application. The City completed and is implementing recommendations from a development and permitting process performance audit which identified opportunities for improvement. In 2023-24, the City will be initiating another audit of utility charges, which when last performed, resulted in additional savings for the City.

The City implemented a web-based contracts software solution to strengthen the contract development, approval and oversight process.

Additionally, the City implemented a new agenda management system to facilitate streamlining in Council and Commission agenda preparation. In 2023-24, the City will continue its multiyear effort to modernize internal systems which currently includes an online permitting program and internal project management system.

As described above, the City is working towards improving internal systems which support operations. It will be a multiyear effort.

2024-25 Budget Outlook
The proposed 2024-25 budget includes use of some of its reserves but is anticipated to maintain a General Fund Unassigned and Assigned reserve balance of 60 and 42 percent, respectively, for a total combined reserve balance of 102 percent. The General Fund represents a substantial portion of City operations, and as such, remains a primary focus in budget discussions.

General Fund Activity
Finance estimates that revenue minus expenditures will end 2023-24 and 2024-25 with changes in General Fund 001 balance reductions of ($866,663) and ($1,083,960), respectively. The General Fund continues to support operations in other funds and in most cases, capital improvement activity. Due to the exhausting of federal funding from the American Rescue Plan, the City will not have short-term annual infusions outside of tax revenue to support operations. Consequently, the City will be relying on the General Fund unassigned fund balance to balance the 2024-25 budget. We will not be able to sustain this over the long-term, and continued resiliency plan actions are necessary to ensure longer term financial sustainability.

Assigned Reserve Fund Balances and Establishing Funding Goals In 2021-22, the City shifted $1 million to support the creation of a prefunding capital improvement reserve called the Capital Assets Reserve (Fund 100). On April 26, 2022, the City Council approved assigning another $5.5 million to the Capital Assets Reserve to fund the estimated need for lifecycle capital assets bringing the total to $6.5 million.

Additionally, the City Council assigned fund balances to other categories such as Other Post-Employment Benefits1 (OPEB) and Compensated Absences2. These assignments were intended to enhance transparency that the City has planned and can address these future liabilities. In 2024-25, the City continues this commitment.

The City Council maintains funding goals for several key reserve categories, which included
o Maintaining the General Fund Reserve (including Funds 001, 070, and 100) funding level goal at 75% of General Fund operating expenditures. o Maintaining Capital Asset Reserve, OPEB, and Compensated Absences funding goals at 80% of estimated liabilities.
o Maintaining the unassigned General Fund Reserve at 25% of General Fund operating expenditures.

1 Other Post Employment Benefits are employee benefits, other than pension distributions, that employees may begin to receive from the City once they retire. 2 Compensated Absences are absences for which employees will be paid, such as vacation, sick leave, etc.

Accounting standards require the City to measure the accrued absences as they represent a present liability to the City.

While the City expects to end the next fiscal year utilizing some of the unassigned General Fund balance, the 2024-25 budget projects fund balances which equal or exceed these funding goals.

Other Anticipated Operations Activity
The proposed 2024-25 budget includes several planned allocations, which are outlined below.
 Adding funding of $20,000 to the Community Building & Senior Center for stage floor refinishing; and
 Increasing funding of $480,000 to replace two fleet vehicles and a new tractor skip loader that are past their useful life; and
 Adding funding of $120,000 for a Crack Sealers & Skid Mounted Compressor; and  Adding funding of $225,000 Safety Element Update & Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Other Planned Capital Activity
The proposed budget includes several planned allocations and carryovers for improving our City’s infrastructure, parks, and buildings, which include the following:

Arrow Highway Pavement Rehabilitation project $3,750,000 San Dimas Loop Repair Project $3,000,000
Badillo Pavement Rehabilitation Project $2,295,043
Fifth Street Pavement Rehabilitation project $900,000
Red Steel Pole 6.6kV Street Lighting System &
Wooden Street Light Replacement $555,000
City Hall & Train Depot Roof Seam Replacement $480,000
Pavement Preservation $444,000
Cul-de-sacs repairs $200,000
Design – San Dimas Canyon to Terrebonne $150,000
Design - Bonita Ave from San Dimas Ave to the
eastern City Limits $50,000
Total $ 11,824,043
Conclusion
Going forward, the City must continue to address structural deficits in overall government activity to ensure the City remains financially sustainable for the long-term. One-time funding from the federal government, short-term saving measures, vacancy savings, and other unanticipated one-time revenue increases may provide short term benefit, but such activity does not resolve what is a difference between the City’s capabilities and public

expectations for service delivery. We anticipate the City’s strategic planning process this calendar year will assist in defining expectations and will guide future changes.

The City also needs to continue its approach to community quality of life. This includes  Supporting City operations to maintain and improve residents’ quality of life in San Dimas and the visitor experience when enjoying our town,  Aligning our municipal code with the expectations desired for property condition, blight, and ensuring personal responsibility in behaviors that impact other residents and visitors,
 Predicting future exposures which negatively impact quality of life, and implementing mechanisms to limit or eliminate their impacts, and  Maintaining constructive efforts to consider special populations, such as seniors, the unhoused, and the disabled during efforts to improve quality of life in a way that balances compassion with accountability and is done in a smart, fiscally prudent manner.

The City is well into this approach, but more needs to be done.

The City is in its most critical time in deciding what City services and infrastructure will look in the future, and key decisions must be made soon to determine the direction the City will take to address what the City will be able to provide in the future.

The City has done a wonderful job over the past ten years making prudent decisions maintaining the organization’s focus on the basic provisions of government service. While we provide significant recreational programing and support for our seniors, the City did not expand too far too quickly.

Historically, the City also created avoidable situations that impacted its ability to address priorities. Waiting 20 plus years to update fees and charges meant that millions of dollars went to subsidize private individuals and entities who received direct services and benefit with taxpayer funding but did not necessarily result in more economic benefit. We have generally fixed this area, but it is necessary not to wait so long to keep up with the increasing cost of services. Additionally, the City has been very generous to provide services to both our residents and residents of other cities who do not contribute similarly to our tax base, but where we do not fully charge the cost of service to those nonresidents. This too is an area of discussion that needs to be considered.

A significant issue at hand is the escalating expenses associated with the upkeep and restoration of essential capital infrastructure like roads, walkways, parks, and other physical assets, alongside the rising costs related to law enforcement services.

While the City spends millions on capital, the total investment needed to maintain and improve current condition indexes is far more. As such, as street degrades, the cost of

bringing it back up to an acceptable level exponential grows. For example, the 2024-25 budget includes $900,000 for the 5th street rehabilitation. This will redo the surface of the street, but it is nowhere near the amount necessary to eliminate the high crest in the middle of the street which occurred due to years of doing our best with limited capital funding. This is not just the case for the other numbered streets, but also in all our neighborhoods where we have not been able to properly maintain them to lower the total cost of ownership. More investment today would yield significantly more cost savings tomorrow; however, additional revenue is needed for this to occur.

In terms of our law enforcement contract with the County of Los Angeles, costs are rising.

The expectation will be that the costs will continue to rise annually and since this contract is our largest single contract by far, the pressures of inadequate General Fund revenue will certainly have an effect on the level of law enforcement services our City can provide.

Nevertheless, the increasing cost of everything and the limited revenue receipts resulted in a narrowing of the resources available over the last five years, and as such, we have arrived at the point where we cannot continue the standards and level of service residents have enjoyed. Additionally, the City has not been able to invest the multimillions in capital streets, sidewalks, and infrastructure necessary to maintain and increase the condition of those assets. Frankly, the City does not have adequate revenue to do so, and trimming expenses and operations under the façade of efficiency can never come close to closing the gap materially.

In reviewing options to address the areas above, the options are few and never pleasant.

Here are some of the potential options knowing that there may be more options or a mix and match that may be considered:
 One option is to utilize debt financing to accelerate capital projects. Unfortunately, high interest rates and staffing levels that cannot currently support such investment would be an impediment.
 The second option is to utilize reserves, such as making a massive payment to CalPERS to cover the unfunded liability. This would free up about $1 million/annually that is going to pay this unfunded liability currently. The challenge here is that $1 million/year is not adequate for the significant investment needed.

Concerns with this approach include losses on investment with funds held by CALPERS. CALPERS investment approach can create large positive or negative swings in market value. If we overfund the UAL and market values increase then we would create a super funded status with funds held by CALPERS that otherwise could have been used for other community needs. Market losses on investments held by CALPERS could result in additional UAL payments that were not expected to be necessary after the investment was made.
 The third option is to reconsider a district sales tax measure as was considered before which may generate about $6 million/annual with a large chunk paid for by non-residents who shop in our City. While this would provide a significant

investment to support capital infrastructure and cost of high priority operational items, such as public safety, the previous measure failed and it is unknown the appetite for the public to support such measure.
 The fourth option is to strategically reduce operations, programs, and services to reduce the expenditure footprint to match the available revenue. This would mean reductions to public safety, recreation programs, closing of facilities, and staff reductions. We can avoid this option due to our current reserve balances, but this option may become a reality if we wait too long to act.

Our situation is not different from other cities generally. Most are in the same boat, but we are fortunate to have a higher level of reserves that buys us more time to make good decisions due to the prudent practices of the City going back more than a decade. To bring the public into the decision-making process as they will be directly impacted by our fiscal future, we will be utilizing a new platform called “Balancing Act” to gather input from the public on how to best balance the budget. This and our strategic plan will help guide us in the best path forward.

While it is natural to focus on the negatives, we must actively ensure that we also emphasize our strengths. We are well positioned to continue as a leader in the quality of life residents’ experience living in San Dimas. This is supported by the over 80% of residents who rated overall quality of life and San Dimas as a place to raise a family as excellent or good in our 2023 community survey. The focus should be to make prudent decisions with the future in mind, adjust to circumstances as they arise and even when uncomfortable, and to continue to celebrate our successes while learning from our mistakes. We can address future challenges if we are willing to be bold, prudent, and remain together as one community.

It is an honor to be a part of this amazing organization and City, and I look forward to being a part our many successes and navigating challenges ahead. I have faith that we will endure and thrive.

Sincerely,
Chris Constantin
City Manager

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED TRANSFER TRANSFER ESTIMATED ESTIMATED

BEGINNING REVENUES IN OUT EXPENDITURES ENDING BAL
FUNDS 7/1/2024 2024-25 2024-25 2024-25 2024-25 6/30/2025 01 General 23,916,020 31,405,047 402,000 446,789 30,720,466 1,723,752 22,832,060 02 Gas Tax 812,219 996,572 - 250,000 988,000 - 570,791
03 Walker House 68,612 210,070 - - 206,466 - 72,216
06 Sewer 1,351,939 93,400 - 290,000 - 1,155,339
07 Lighting 3,599,318 1,659,540 - 150,000 3,017,000 - 2,091,858 08 L/S Parcel Tax (4,990) 1,047,000 157,507 - 1,199,517 - - 12 Infrastructure 4,369,281 4,703,352 93,752 - 9,166,385 - - 20 Comm Park/Fac 114,628 - - - - - 114,628
21 Open Sp #1 6,137 - - - - - 6,137
22 Open Sp #2 259,932 - - - 100,000 - 159,932
23 Open Sp #3 29,791 - - - - - 29,791
40 CDBG - 489,091 - - 489,091 - -
41 COPS 204,955 200,000 - - 212,000 - 192,955
53 Golf Course 982,000 1,388,069 - - 652,000 - 1,718,069 70 New Equipment Reserve 915,045 - - - 191,500 - 723,545 71 AQMD 104,055 57,000 - 2,000 139,055 - 20,000
72 Prop A 6,383,716 1,160,528 - - 1,104,546 - 6,439,698 73 Prop C 1,624,896 840,073 - - 990,000 - 1,474,969
74 Measure R 1,674,891 646,305 - - 939,000 - 1,382,196
75 Open Space Mnt 5,243 45,940 1,817 - 53,000 - -
76 Measure M 2,024,471 755,812 - - 475,000 - 2,305,283
77 Road Maint. Rehab Act 416,629 924,248 - - 600,000 - 740,877 78 Measure W 401,141 698,450 - - 494,000 - 605,591
100 Capital Assets Reserve 7,567,149 1,630,000 - 880,000 8,317,149 ALL CITY FUNDS TOTAL 57,233,147 46,914,428 2,285,076 848,789 52,907,026 1,723,752 50,953,084 34 HOUSING AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR TOTAL 143,042 1,869,063 287,465 - 1,112,886 - 1,186,685 113 Housing Authority 1,825,000 6,919,461 - - 4,878,629 - 3,865,832 38 /39 SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TOTAL 1,739,000 3,988,836 - - 4,864,798 - 863,038

GRAND TOTAL CITY AND
ENTITIES 50,621,470 70,010,507 2,572,541 848,789 63,763,339 1,723,752 56,868,639 AND TRANSACTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SCHEDULE 1: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED ENDING BALANCES

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
USE OF

RESERVES
2022-23

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED
GENERAL FUND 01 BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 12,154,646 16,652,393 16,652,393 14,079,428 ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE RISK/LAW 2,036,592 2,036,592 2,036,592 2,036,592 ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE EMERG SRV 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,000,000 ASSIGNED FUND BALANCES OPEB 2,978,932 2,978,932 2,978,932 2,300,000 ASSIGNED FUND BALANCES COMPENSATED ABSENCES 1,264,766 1,264,766 1,264,766 1,500,000 ASSIGNED FB - NPDES (281-004) 600,000 600,000 600,000 - TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE 24,782,683 20,284,936 24,782,683 23,916,020

GENERAL FUND DETAIL OF REVENUES
311 PROPERTY TAX 9,085,891 9,008,662 9,117,732 9,497,071 312 SALES TAX 9,015,486 8,764,235 8,593,856 8,777,917
314 FRANCHISE FEE 2,817,961 2,754,000 2,864,923 2,934,500 315 LICENSE & PERMIT TAXES/FEES 629,843 595,000 672,500 673,000 316 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES 1,770,634 1,730,000 1,675,000 1,695,000 317 DOCUMENTARY STAMP 207,165 225,000 200,000 200,000
Total All Taxes 23,275,729 23,328,148 23,124,011 23,777,488 321 BUILDING PERMITS 1,085,952 701,500 1,008,400 912,000 322 OTHER PERMITS 542,300 362,050 498,025 550,025
Total Building/Other Permits 1,628,252 1,063,550 1,508,425 1,462,025 331 FINES & PENALTIES 100,370 89,050 100,075 177,075
332 CITATIONS 283,000 337,201 302,635 291,000
Total Fines & Penalties 437,570 372,050 402,710 468,075 341 USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY 778,404 2,130,877 2,148,972 1,650,569 116 REPAYMENT OF ADVANCED FUNDS 1,172,634 1,034,760 1,034,760 1,437,325 Total Use of Money & Property 1,951,038 3,165,637 3,183,732 3,087,894 353 INTER GOVERNMENTAL 35,816 30,000 30,000 30,000
355 HOMEOWNERS EXEMPTIONS 14,583 15,000 15,000 15,000
Total Intergovernmental 50,399 45,000 45,000 45,000
356 STATE GRANTS 95,604 225,932 116,209 93,360
358 MISC GRANTS 208,664 8,892 8,664 208,744
359 FEDERAL GRANTS 32,056 9,500 9,500 13,900
Total State & Federal Grants 136,552 444,096 134,373 316,004 360 CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES 65,467 39,400 31,100 32,900 Zoning/Subdivision/Technology/Environmental Fees (001//003/004) 23,937 16,500 16,700 37,500 DPRB Fees (005) 11,000 11,984 11,000 5,000
Miscellaneous Planning Fees (006/007/008) - 2,100 2,900 3,400 Public Hearing Notice Signs (009) 770 900 200 1,000
Monument Inspection (010) 2,200 900 300 1,000
Misc/Overhead Chgs Dev Serv (360-011) 26,576 8,000 5,000 5,000 Total Charges for Current Services 65,467 39,400 36,100 52,900 361 CHARGES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 425,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Total Charges for Administrative Services 425,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 CHARGES FOR SERVICES OTHER (363/364/365)
363 AUTO IMPOUND STORAGE FEES 10,788 15,000 10,000 10,000 365 SALE OF MAPS & PUBLICATIONS - 500 - -
Total Charges for Services Other 10,788 15,500 10,000 10,000 367 RECREATION FEES & CHARGES 507,905 445,350 434,000 570,350 Total Recreation Fees 507,905 445,350 434,000 570,350
368 RECREATION CENTER FEES 473,885 442,758 542,470 578,260 Total Recreation Center Fees 442,758 473,885 542,470 578,260 REFUNDS\REIMBURSEMENTS/CONTRIBUTIONS (369/370/391/393/395) 369 REFUNDS & REIMBURSMENTS 155,561 148,430 148,430 153,414 395 OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE 1,480,662 468,040 470,540 483,637 Total Ref\Reimbursements 1,636,223 616,470 618,970 637,051 SUB-TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 30, 30,409,086 567,680 30,439,791 31,405,047 500 From Gas Tax Fund 02 225,000 225,000 225,000 250,000 500 From Lighting District Fund 07 125,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 500 From AQMD Fund 71 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Total Transfers 352,000 352,000 352,000 402,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE & TRFS 30,919,680 30,761,086 30,791,791 31,807,047 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS 55,543,769 51,204,616 55,574,473 55,723,067

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

GENERAL FUND 01 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

GENERAL FUND DETAIL OF EXPENDITURES ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
01-4110 CITY COUNCIL
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 39,748 39,720 45,000 66,240 200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 115,000 115,500 116,842
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (72) 15,000 15,000 10,000
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 29,627 29,093 29,093 29,093
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 3,646 13,700 3,800 12,000 Total City Council 212,513 72,949 208,393 234,175
01-4120 CITY MANAGER
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 615,913 691,000 691,000 805,500 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES - - - 71,500
103 OVERTIME - 14,282 - 500
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 175,500 175,500 240,000
010 ADVERTISEMENT 48,599 40,000 40,000 40,000
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 8,400 10,600 10,600 10,800
016 PUBLICATIONS AND DUES 11,159 16,775 16,775 17,850
020 ELECTION SERVICES 136,026 150,000 160,000 150,000
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 9,271 16,276 16,276 17,776
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 83 3,000 1,500 1,000
450 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000
Total City Manager 843,734 1,103,151 1,111,651 1,364,926 01-4150 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 1,033,149 1,138,500 1,138,500 1,072,000 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 62,046 71,500 71,500 - 103 OVERTIME 500 123 150 500
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 402,500 415,000 365,000
010 ADVERSTING 4,500 1,120 9,600 4,640
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 9,612 9,600 9,600 9,600
016 PUBLICATIONS AND DUES 6,508 9,025 9,674 11,239
018 PRINTING 890 455 413 1,000
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45,004 121,500 63,000 4,500
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 11,325 18,000 11,520 19,500
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 16,007 14,200 13,211 16,250 038 EQUIPMENT 1,000 10,537 50 500
408 ANNUAL AWARDS/PROGRAMS 21,878 18,500 16,050 14,500
409 RECRUITMENTS 2,500 127 1,500 2,000
424 ACCIDENT PREVENTION PROGRAM - 2,000 500 1,000
430 SICK LEAVE INCENTIVE PROGRAM 21,890 27,357 27,357 30,000 431 PRODUCTIVITY PROGRAM 1,022 12,000 6,500 2,000
433 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 5,534 8,000 7,500 4,000
434 EMPLOYEE TRAINING 24,616 80,000 30,000 50,000
435 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 2,874 3,500 1,500 1,500 450 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000
Total Administrative Services 1,273,827 1,945,572 1,833,124 1,619,729 01-4170 CITY ATTORNEY
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 578,078 733,605 684,000 675,000 Total City Attorney 578,078 733,605 684,000 675,000
01-4180 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
016 PUBLICATIONS AND DUES 5,250 5,500 5,250 -
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 16,250 16,250 16,250
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 7,250 - 7,250 7,250
Total Economic Development 5,250 29,000 28,750 23,500
01-4190 GENERAL SERVICES
010 ADVERSTING 24,000 88,731 16,800 83,800
014 INSURANCE 5,000 539,396 4,645 759,201
015 MAINTENANCE 6,700 66,251 2,373 85,111
016 PUBLICATIONS AND DUES 37,451 - - 47,785
017 POSTAGE 30,000 33,737 30,000 15,000
018 PRINTING 2,000 1,823 1,000 1,500
019 RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMET 4,450 5,000 5,000 5,000 020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110,653 181,664 169,667 523,349 022 CITY CELL PHONES 28,427 32,000 32,000 32,000
030 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 4,716 8,585 7,500 8,585
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 6,126 5,000 5,000 5,000 035 TECHNOLOGY SUBSCRIPTIONS & LICENSES - - 424,869
038 PUBLIC ACCESS EQUIPMENT - - 8,705
101 FULL TIME SALARIES (CITYWIDE ACCRUAL) 36,921 50,000 50,000 50,000 200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CITYWIDE) 3,767,488 1,797,727 1,785,727 1,575,253 200 PERS Unfunded Liability Contributions (001) 1,823,131 1,575,000 1,570,000 1,325,858 460 OIL PAYMENT PROGRAM/UOBG (041) 4,673 5,200 5,200 5,200 Total General Services 4,730,842 2,152,876 2,114,912 3,630,358

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED
GENERAL FUND 01 BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET

GENERAL FUND DETAIL OF EXPENDITURES
01-4210 PUBLIC SAFETY
015 MAINTENANCE 1,000 - 1,000 1,000
018 PRINTING 1,500 - - 1,000
Sub-Total M & O 2,500 - 1,000 2,000
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,272,505 7,759,479 7,541,792 9,076,508 Sub-Total Contract Law 7,272,505 7,759,479 7,541,792 9,076,508 01-4210 PUBLIC SAFETY (CONTINUED) ()
021 TRAVEL & MEETING - - - 200,000
411 PARKING ADMINISTRATION 95,024 56,200 76,500 77,000
412 MAINTENANCE OF PRISONERS 151 1,015 500 500
413 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 208,610 - - 315,450
428 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM CRIME PREVENTION 2,206 5,000 5,000 5,000 Sub-Total Other Services 305,991 62,215 82,000 397,950
Total Public Safety 7,578,496 7,824,194 7,624,792 9,476,458 01-4211 RISK MANAGEMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT
014 UNINSURED CLAIMES 3,512 7,500 - 5,000 Total Risk Management/Law Enforcement 3,512 - 7,500 5,000 01-4212 EMERGENCY SERVICES
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,788 20,500 24,632 37,050
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 2,317 6,713 - -
078 EMERGENCY REPAIRS 42,855 - - -
Total Emergency Services 48,959 27,213 24,632 37,050
01-4308 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 1,042,753 1,002,000 979,000 1,071,881 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 132,427 130,000 165,000 175,000 103 OVERTIME 2,000 14,364 500 1,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 380,000 315,000 388,000
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 18,600 18,600 18,600 18,600
016 PUBLICATIONS AND DUES 1,818 3,760 2,960 3,280
018 PRINTING 10,506 11,200 8,800 12,700
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 359,949 201,060 217,659 263,100 021 TRAVEL & MEETING 5,080 31,320 14,180 28,100
029 UNIFORMS 866 1,600 1,600 600
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 4,421 5,058 2,700 3,300 450 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000
Total Community Development 1,590,784 1,786,598 1,725,999 1,975,561 01-4310 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/ENG
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 938,557 1,006,500 1,006,500 1,020,000 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 17,237 35,000 28,000 35,000 103 OVERTIME 3,000 405 2,000 3,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 332,000 332,000 326,000
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600
016 PUBLICATION & DUES 14,003 15,500 15,000 16,800
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 449,700 61,000 410,200
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 2,539 9,000 4,000 9,000
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 3,952 4,000 4,000 3,000 450 CONTINGENCY - - - 15,000
Total PW Admin/Eng 989,293 1,867,300 1,465,100 1,850,600 01-4311 BUILDING & SAFETY
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 421,507 452,500 427,000 430,500 102 BUILDING INTERN (001) 18,692 40,000 12,000 -
103 OVERTIME 1,000 1,648 500 1,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 142,372 115,000 148,500
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600
016 PUBLICATION & DUES 6,682 4,715 1,770 2,680
018 PRINTING 2,000 1,395 1,500 2,000
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,678 13,000 8,100 169,000
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 4,260 6,300 5,035 6,600
029 UNIFORMS 2,500 1,311 2,300 1,700
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 557 1,000 1,000 3,500 450 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000
Total Building & Safety 464,329 668,987 577,805 779,080

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET

GENERAL FUND DETAIL OF EXPENDITURES (CONTINUED)
01-4341 STREET MAINTENANCE
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 366,305 388,500 388,500 408,500 103 OVERTIME 50,000 51,347 46,000 50,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 162,936 162,500 183,000
016 PUBLICATION & DUES - 3,250 3,250 3,250
019 RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT - 2,500 2,500 2,500
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 291,037 390,295 322,695 422,400 021 TRAVEL & MEETING 4,310 9,600 9,600 9,600
024 NPDES 327,844 156,306 161,500 262,500
028 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL 6,419 80,000 22,000 40,000 029 UNIFORMS 13,000 10,536 13,000 13,000
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 111,878 195,800 150,178 132,000 450 CONTINGENCY - - - 15,000
Total Street Maintenance 998,138 1,623,725 1,281,723 1,541,750 01-4342 VEHICLE/YARD MAINTENANCE
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 65,873 40,000 40,000 66,752 103 OVERTIME 7,000 3,390 6,000 7,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 20,000 20,000 31,500
011 VEHICLE USE & MAINTENANCE 138,418 150,500 147,500 148,500 016 PUBLICATION & DUES - 500 500 500
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 66,639 40,000 40,000 105,000
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 1,500 - 1,500 1,500
022 UTILITIES 59,500 40,765 54,000 59,500
031 BUILDING MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 6,160 20,000 10,000 10,000 033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 22,870 53,174 50,000 53,174 041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 20,000 - 20,000 20,000
450 CONTINGENCY - - - 15,000
Total Vehicle/Yard Maintenance 344,115 412,174 389,500 518,426 01-4345 TRAFFIC CONTROL
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 138,411 140,000 140,000 147,000 103 OVERTIME 9,000 2,072 5,000 9,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 55,000 55,000 65,000
016 PUBLICATION & DUES 1 320 320 320
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 133,035 330,000 265,000 301,000 021 TRAVEL & MEETING 2,675 - 2,675 2,675
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 46,981 55,000 55,000 105,000 038 SIGN MAINTENANCE 40,635 58,000 45,000 51,000
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 38,914 50,000 50,000 50,000
450 CONTINGENCY - - - 15,000
Total Traffic Control 400,047 699,995 617,995 745,995
01-4410 FACILITIES
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 429,306 519,000 519,000 526,000 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 73,705 91,000 91,000 94,355 103 OVERTIME 8,000 5,520 8,000 10,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 230,000 230,000 235,000
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
015 MAINTENANCE 10,780 8,239 7,780 10,780
016 PUBLICATION & DUES 240 575 450 450
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 229 1,400 500 1,000
022 UTILITIES 39,090 15,894 23,600 23,700
023 CONTRACT SERVICES - 6,690 6,690 93,481
029 UNIFORMS 4,900 5,458 4,900 5,500
031 BUILDING MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 8,805 8,500 8,500 8,500 033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 7,255 5,500 5,500 5,500 041 CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - -
450 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000
Total Facilities 928,435 557,652 908,920 1,027,266

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

GENERAL FUND DETAIL OF EXPENDITURES (CONTINUED)
2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
01-4411 CIVIC CENTER
015 MAINTENANCE 45,944 45,122 46,856 53,706 020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,416 2,600 1,932 2,200 022 UTILITIES 160,507 188,000 175,000 177,200
023 CONTRACT SERVICES - - - 76,829
031 BUILDING MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 9,195 13,500 13,500 13,500 033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 7,886 8,000 8,000 8,000 041 CAPITAL OUTLA p Y 10,000 45,334 10,000 -
450 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000
Total Civic Center 269,460 268,044 255,288 341,435
01-4412 SENIOR CENTER
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 121,951 130,500 125,500 131,000 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES - 99,912 99,912 104,908 200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 78,000 70,000 73,000
013 SENIOR PROGRAMS 38,068 40,314 40,314 40,314
015 MAINTENANCE 17,030 11,211 17,213 17,388
022 UTILITIES 57,250 45,856 53,750 53,750
023 CONTRACT SERVICES - - - 54,568
031 BUILDING MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 5,952 9,750 9,750 9,000 033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 4,407 5,000 5,000 5,000 041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,945 7,000 7,000 7,000 450 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000
Total Senior Center 234,390 444,756 428,439 505,928
01-4414 PARK MAINTENANCE
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 277,818 308,000 287,250 311,813 103 OVERTIME 2,949 5,000 5,000 5,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 120,500 115,000 131,000
015 MAINTENANCE 2,918 4,000 5,103 4,500
016 PUBLICATION & DUES - 1,785 1,785 1,850
018 PRINTING - 200 200 200
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45,569 9,065 11,565 55,672
021 TRAVEL & MEETING 125 1,000 1,000 1,500
022 CELL PHONES - - - -
023 GRAFFITI REMOVAL CONTRACT - - - 111,583
029 UNIFORMS 2,377 2,380 2,380 2,650
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 7,385 10,000 10,000 12,500 450 CONTINGENCY 10,000
Total Park Maintenance 339,142 461,930 439,283 648,267
01-4415 MEDIAN & PARKWAY MAINTENANCE
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 330,715 339,591 332,250 352,813 103 OVERTIME 3,930 5,000 5,000 5,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 150,500 145,000 148,000
016 PUBLICATION & DUES 485 1,880 1,880 2,480
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 117,459 128,090 128,090 129,914 021 TRAVEL & MEETING 150 1,250 1,250 1,250
022 UTILITIES 146,000 134,723 146,000 146,000
029 UNIFORMS 2,145 2,380 2,380 2,650
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 2,032 4,000 4,000 4,000 450 CONTINGENCY 10,000 -
Total Parkways & Median Island Maint 591,639 778,691 765,850 802,106 01-4420 RECREATION
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 470,574 530,000 530,000 538,500 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 480,025 448,787 446,823 407,544 103 OVERTIME 10,000 8,595 9,265 10,000
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 247,000 247,000 280,000
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 9,600 g () 10,000 10,000 10,000
016 PUBLICATIONS & DUES 1,620 1,730 1,568 2,028
018 PRINTING 5,200 4,701 5,200 5,700
019 RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 20,333 58,410 32,000 43,600 020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 237,166 250,260 203,700 203,700 021 TRAVEL & MEETING 12,953 9,235 9,235 12,300
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 32,863 27,600 27,600 27,600 034 FEE & CHARGE PROGRAM - 102,515 86,015 97,005
450 CONTINGENCY 10,000 -
110 SUMMER FOOD PROGRAM 13,958 9,500 13,481 13,500
Total Recreation 1,710,237 1,292,387 1,621,887 1,661,477

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET

GENERAL FUND DETAIL OF EXPENDITURES (CONTINUED)
01-4430 SAN DIMAS RECREATION CENTER
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 68,878 67,500 67,500 70,500 102 PART TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 379,491 409,741 390,268 497,394 103 OVERTIME - 539 - -
200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 105,000 100,000 110,000
010 ADVERTISING 1,050 - - -
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 490 77 490 490
015 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 48,601 37,335 37,335 32,075 016 PUBLICATIONS & DUES 559 2,065 2,288 2,300
018 PRINTING 1,450 1,040 1,450 1,800
019 RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 2,906 3,200 3,200 3,500 020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 172,594 205,281 211,885 217,885 021 TRAVEL & MEETING (287) 815 815 850
022 UTILITIES 178,530 172,059 163,530 173,530
023 CONTRACT SERVICES - - - 72,552
029 UNIFORMS 4,500 2,216 4,500 4,500
031 BUILDING MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 5,803 10,000 10,000 10,000 033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 38,689 45,000 45,000 45,000 034 FEE & CHARGE PROGRAM 1,906 4,000 4,000 4,000
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 20,466 20,000 - 15,000
450 CONTINGENCY - 10,000
Total SAN DIMAS RECREATION CENTER 915,537 1,095,958 1,057,261 1,256,376 SUB-TOTAL GENERAL EXPENDITURES 24,122,560 26,782,456 25,165,306 30,720,466 01-5000 Transfers Out/Loans
099 Transfer to City Hall/CB Plz Fund 04 (004) 691,330 689,639 689,639 - 099 Transfer to Landscape Maint Fund 08 (008) 91,000 - - 157,507 099 Transfer to Housing Fund 34 (20% loan set aside) (034) 234,527 206,952 206,952 287,465 099 Transfer to Fund 75 (075) 28,000 5,974 5,974 1,817
Total Transfers Out/Loans 1,044,857 902,565 902,565 446,789 01-5000 Use of Reserves
099 Reserves to Infrastructure (012) 892,476 3,339,657 3,339,657 93,752 099 Reserves to Park Dev Fund 20 (020) - 645,000 645,000 - 099 Reserves to Open Space #1 Fund 21 (021) - 298,250 - - 099 Reserves to Open Space #2 Fund 22 (022) 63,791 10,925 - 10,925 099 Reserves to Capital Reserve Fund 100 (100) - 1,595,000 1,595,000 1,630,000 Total Use of Reserves 1,254,517 5,590,582 5,590,582 1,723,752 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXP/TRFS 33,275,602 26,421,934 31,658,453 32,891,007

FUND BALANCE DETAIL
UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE (281-001) 16,652,393 12,431,575 14,079,428 12,995,468 ASSIGNED FB RISK MGT/LAW ENF (281-076) 2,036,592 2,036,592 2,036,592 2,036,592 ASSIGNED FB EMERG SERVICES (281-078) 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 ASSIGNED FB GENERAL PLAN (281-079) 250,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 ASSIGNED FB OPEB 2,978,932 2,300,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 ASSIGNED FB COMPENSATED ABSENCES 1,264,766 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 ASSIGNED FB - NPDES (281-004) 600,000 - - -
TOTAL ENDING GENERAL FUND BALANCE 24, 22,268,167 782,683 23,916,020 22,832,060 TOTAL EXP/TRFS/AND FUND BALANCE 51, 55,543,769 204,616 55,574,473 55,723,067

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
STATE GAS TAX FUND 02
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,563,806 1,474,384 1,474,384 812,219

REVENUE
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 36,772 10,000 50,000 40,000 358 GAS TAXES 991,761 879,740 941,335 956,572
Total Revenue 1,001,761 916,512 991,335 996,572
Total Available Funds 2,476,145 2,480,318 2,465,719 1,808,791 EXPENDITURES (4841)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,861 4,000 4,000 4,000
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - 90,000
554 PAVEMENT 1,199,732 196,565 1,100,000 360,000
557 VIA VERDE - 332,255 - -
559 SIDEWALK REPAIR 248,253 364,922 324,500 359,000
616 GOLDEN HILLS ROAD - 75,785 - 75,000
639 BADILLO ST. 100,000 - - 100,000
EXPENDITURES (5000)
5000 TRANSFER TO THE GENERAL FUND 001 225,000 225,000 225,000 250,000 Total Expenditures 1,005,934 1,969,439 1,653,500 1,238,000 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,474,384 506,706 812,219 570,791 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 2,480,318 2,476,145 2,465,719 1,808,791

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
WALKER HOUSE LLC FUND 03
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 286,311 76,735 76,735 68,612

REVENUE
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 30,586 39,831 77,186 100,991 116 REPAYMENT OF ADVANCED FUNDS 103,885 98,938 103,885 109,079 Total Revenue 134,470 138,768 181,071 210,070
Total Available Funds 211,205 425,079 257,806 278,682

EXPENDITURES
014 INSURANCE 65,679 56,739 65,679 67,450
015 MAINTENANCE 30,360 36,275 29,460 27,445
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24,936 25,000 25,000 25,000
022 UTILITIES 22,300 17,774 25,350 26,350
023 CONTRACT SERVICES 206,674 62,164 37,705 38,721
031 BUILDING MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 2,972 3,000 3,000 3,500 033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 2,975 3,000 3,000 3,000 041 CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - 15,000
Total Expenditures 348,345 211,503 189,194 206,466
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 76,735 (298) 68,612 72,216
Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 425,079 211,205 257,806 278,682

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
CITY HALL/COMM BLDG/PLAZA FUND 04

ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE - - - -

REVENUE
500 TRANSFER IN FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 689,639 691,331 689,639 - Total Revenue 689,639 691,331 689,639 -
Total Available Funds 689,639 691,331 689,639 -
EXPENDITURES (4411)
049 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 691,330 689,639 689,639 -
Total Expenditures 691,331 689,639 689,639 -

ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE - - - -
Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 691,331 689,639 689,639 -

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
SEWER EXPANSION FUND 06
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 1,372,818 1,354,052 1,372,818 1,351,939

REVENUES
364 INDUSTRIAL WASTE/SEWER CHARGES 96,596 85,000 80,721 85,000 372 BONELLI SEWER MAINTENANCE 7,692 7,900 7,900 7,900
392 SEWER CONNECTION FEES 4,060 2,500 500 500
Total Revenue 95,400 108,348 89,121 93,400
Total Available Funds 1,468,218 1,462,400 1,461,939 1,445,339 EXPENDITURES (4310)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70,127 105,000 80,000 110,000 EXPENDITURES (4841)
604 MISCELLANEOUS SEWER PROJECTS 19,455 200,000 30,000 180,000 Total Expenditures 89,582 305,000 110,000 290,000
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 1,372,818 1,163,218 1,351,939 1,155,339 Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 1,462,400 1,468,218 1,461,939 1,445,339

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
CITY WIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 07
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 4,319,205 3,881,657 4,319,205 3,599,318

REVENUES
311 PROPERTY TAXES 1,621,048 1,581,700 1,599,273 1,603,600 355 HOMEOWNERS EXEMPTION 5,980 5,940 5,940 5,940
358 MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS 45,044 793,455 - 50,000
Total Revenue 2,381,095 1,672,070 1,605,213 1,659,540
Total Available Funds 6,700,300 5,553,727 5,924,418 5,258,858 EXPENDITURES (4341)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52,231 504,680 102,100 534,000 022 UTILITIES 730,000 640,015 720,000 760,000
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 10,907 79,000 15,000 50,000 041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,345,000 - 745,000 555,000
EXPENDITURES (4345)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 361,319 672,000 461,000 526,000 022 UTILITIES 82,000 57,069 82,000 85,000
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,523 169,477 15,000 127,000
602 BADILLO 130,800 - - 130,000
657 ARROW HIGHWAY 250,000 - 60,000 250,000
660 BONITA 100,000 (14,542) - -
EXPENDITURES (5000)
Transfer to General Fund 01 (5000-099-001) 125,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 Total Expenditures 1,234,522 4,187,957 2,325,100 3,167,000 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 4,319,205 2,512,343 3,599,318 2,091,858 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 5,553,727 6,700,300 5,924,418 5,258,858

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
LANDSCAPE PARCEL TAX FUND 08
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 114,309 120,853 120,853 (4,990)

REVENUES
369 REIMBURSEMENTS 25,109 35,000 26,038 27,000
371 ASSESSMENTS 986,008 1,014,550 1,015,000 1,020,000
500 TRANSFER IN FROM GENERAL FUND 001 91,000 - - 157,507 Total Revenue 1,102,117 1,049,550 1,041,038 1,204,507
Total Available Funds 1,170,403 1,216,426 1,161,891 1,199,517

EXPENDITURES
PARK MAINTENANCE (4414)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 260,594 279,492 296,685 308,207 022 UTILITIES 350,993 345,950 345,950 345,950 033 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 20,768 20,000 27,081 30,000
Sub-Total Park Maintenance 632,355 645,442 669,716 684,157 PARKWAYS & TREES (4415)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 421,984 442,256 447,215 463,850 022 UTILITIES 31,950 25,438 31,950 31,950
033 DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 15,796 18,000 18,000 19,560
Sub-Total Parkways & Trees 463,218 492,206 497,165 515,360 Total Expenditures 1,095,573 1,137,648 1,166,881 1,199,517 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 120,853 32,755 (4,990) 0
Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 1,216,426 1,170,403 1,161,891 1,199,517

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 12 BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 2,480,086 1,795,393 2,480,086 4,369,281

REVENUES
358 MISC GRANTS 60,000 54,250 60,000 20,000
359 STATE GRANTS 48,950 - - 96,352
366 SOLAR GRANTS 40,000 - - 40,000
369 REIMBURSEMENTS/GRANTS 387,000 1,977,000 20,000 4,547,000 500 USE OF RESERVES FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 892,476 3,339,657 3,418,236 93,752 Total Revenue 5,465,607 1,333,726 3,498,236 4,797,104
Total Available Funds 3,129,119 7,945,693 5,978,322 9,166,385 EXPENDITURES (4310)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 88,950 88,950 296,342
EXPENDITURES (4410)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,435 10,000 10,000 10,000
EXPENDITURES (4841)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 616,600 y( ) 7,770,646 1,510,091 8,860,043 , , , , Total Expenditures 649,033 7,869,596 1,609,041 9,166,385 ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 2,480,086 76,097 - 4,369,281
Total Est Req and Assigned Fund Balance 3,129,119 7,945,693 5,978,322 9,166,385

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
COMMUNITY PARKS & FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND 20
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 128,047 107,509 107,509 114,628

REVENUES
319 DEVELOPMENT TAX 7,944 - 3,200 -
358 MISC GRANTS 208,899 64,223 - -
500 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND - 645,000 645,000 -
Total Revenue 853,899 72,167 648,200 -
Total Available Funds 200, 961,408 214 755,709 114,628
EXPENDITURES (4410)
929 PEDESTRIAN & EQUESTRIAN BRIDGE 40,925 9,675 - -
937 REPAIR/REPLACE 51,780 784,412 641,081 -
Total Expenditures 92,705 794,087 - 641,081
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 107,509 167,321 114,628 114,628
Total Estimated Expenditures
and Assigned Fund Balance 200,214 961,408 755,709 114,628

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT #1 (NORTH & WEST) FUND 21
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 124,003 511,851 511,851 6,137

REVENUES
356 STATE GRANTS 134,830 862,561 847,391 -
393 CONTRIBUTIONS 33,254 - - -
500 TRANSFERS IN FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 - 298,250 - - Total Revenue 895,815 433,080 847,391 -
Total Available Funds 1,407,666 557,083 1,359,242 6,137 EXPENDITURES (4410)
601 LONE HILL 311,983 - 283,693 -
605 SPORTS SPLEX/FIELD IMPROVEMENTS - - - -
650 LODGEPOLE FENCE 16,588 21,412 21,412 -
927 HORSETHIEF CANYON PARK IMPROVEMENTS 12,739 648,000 648,000 - 928 NORTHERN FOOTHILL TRAILS 5,451 - - -
EXPENDITURES (4430)
430 RECREATION CENTER IMPROVEMENTS - 400,000 400,000 -
EXPENDITURES (4841)
650 MEDIANS 19,547 10,453 - -
Total Expenditures 1,400,942 45,232 1,353,105 -
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 511,851 6,724 6,137 6,137
Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 557,083 1,407,666 1,359,242 6,137

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT #2 (EAST) FUND 22
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 253,684 298,180 298,180 259,932

REVENUE
500 TRANSFERS IN FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 10,925 63,791 - - Total Revenue 10,925 63,791 - -
Total Available Funds 309,105 317,475 298,180 259,932
EXPENDITURES (4410)
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 30,000 - - 100,000
603 CIVIC CENTER 100,000 - 8,953 -
924 PIONNER PARK TENNIS COURT LIGHTS 19,295 19,295 19,295 - 937 REPAIR/REPLACE 29,000 - 10,000 -
Total Expenditures 178,295 19,295 38,248 100,000
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 298,180 130,810 259,932 159,932
Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 317,475 309,105 298,180 259,932

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT #3 ( SOUTH) FUND 23
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 45,786 29,791 29,791 29,791

REVENUE
500 TRANSFERS IN FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 - - - -
Total Revenue - - - -
Total Available Funds 45,786 29,791 29,791 29,791
EXPENDITURES (4410)
937 REPAIR/REPLACE 15,995 - - -
Total Expenditures - 15,995 - -
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 29,791 29,791 29,791 29,791
Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 45,786 29,791 29,791 29,791

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
HOUSING AUTHORITY SUCCESSOR FUND 34 (02-01-12)
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,150,653 2,871,187 1,847,574 1,289,787 RESTRICTED FB GROVE STATION L&M 579,276 579,276 579,276 579,276 TOTAL RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 3, 1,729,929 450,463 2,426,850 1,869,063

REVENUE
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 181,447 109,238 105,174 122,442 358 MISC GRANTS 20,000 - - 20,000
500 TRANSFERS IN FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 206,952 234,527 206,952 287,465 Total Revenue 336,190 415,973 312,126 429,907
Total Available Funds 2,066,119 3,866,436 2,738,976 2,298,970 EXPENDITURES (4120)
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
016 PUBLICATION & DUES - 1,000 - 1,000
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 197,215 467,000 374,000 452,000 021 TRAVEL & MEETING 267 1,000 500 2,000
101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 135,985 141,250 141,250 179,586 200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40,313 61,080 61,080 61,530
506 REIMBURSEMENTS 487,918 - - -
EXPENDITURES (4802)
014 INSURANCE 12,833 11,086 12,833 13,179
015 MAINTENANCE 231,684 418,316 6,300 6,300
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,305 70,000 35,200 65,000
022 UTILITIES 16,250 22,781 16,250 19,791
033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 28 4,500 4,500 4,500
851 MOBILE HOME REHAB 97,052 297,334 95,000 205,000
863 MOBILITY RAMPS 75,093 224,907 120,000 100,000
864 PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS 133,860 316,112 - -
Total Expenditures 1,439,586 2,034,582 869,913 1,112,886 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,847,574 (547,739) 1,289,787 606,809 RESTRICTED FB GROVE STATION L&M 579,276 579,276 579,276 579,276 TOTAL ENDING FUND BALANCE 2,426,850 31,537 1,869,063 1,186,085 Total Est Req. & Restricted Fund Balance 3,866,436 2,066,119 2,738,976 2,298,970

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUND 38

ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE
(1,187,999) (1,150,039) (1,062,000) (875,962)
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE (1,187,999) (1,150,039) (1,062,000) (875,962)

REVENUE
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY - - - -
500 TRANSFERS IN FROM RETIREMENT OBLIGATION FUND 39 2, 1,710,796 143,990 1,641,296 4,864,798 Total Revenue 2,143,990 1,710,796 1,641,296 4,864,798
Total Available Funds 522,797 993,951 579,296 3,988,836

BALANCE SHEET
251 LONG TERM DEPT ADVANCE FROM WALKER HOUSE 003 1,271,572 962,607 962,607 1,546,404

EXPENDITURES
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24,000 139,000 59,500 139,000 500 INTEREST ON DEBT WALKER HOUSE FUND 03 110,414 143,421 110,414 132,470 565 COSTCO PARKING LOT LEASE 726,846 404,565 404,565 3,046,924 Total Expenditures 2,165,839 1,616,586 1,537,086 4,864,798 FUND BALANCE OFFSET - EXPENSE TO INCREASE DEBT 109,888 81,828 81,828 109,079 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE (1,011,961) (1,062,000) (875,962) (766,883) Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 1,103,839 604,625 661,124 4,097,915

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
REDEVELOPMENT OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND 39
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,641,296 1,705,567 1,641,296 4,864,798

REVENUE
370 RETIREMENT OBLIGATION PAYMENTS 2,079,719 1,710,796 4,864,798 1,739,000 Total Revenue 1,710,796 2,079,719 4,864,798 1,739,000
Total Available Funds 3,352,092 3,785,286 6,506,094 6,603,798

EXPENDITURES
099 TRANSFER OUT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUND 038 1,710,796 2,143,990 1,641,296 4,864,798 Total Expenditures 2,143,990 1,710,796 1,641,296 4,864,798 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1, 1,641,296 641,296 4,864,798 1,739,000 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 3,785,286 3,352,092 6,506,094 6,603,798

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND 40

RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE - - - -

CARRY OVER PROGRAM INCOME - - - -

REVENUES
359 FEDERAL GRANTS 183,977 427,504 427,504 489,091
Total Revenue 427,504 183,977 427,504 489,091
Total Available Funds 427,504 183,977 427,504 489,091

EXPENDITURES
819 CDBG SERVICES 34,438 40,361 40,361 18,072
820 HOUSING REHABILITATION 146,324 161,447 161,447 72,289 852 LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAM - 215,696 215,696 388,730
858 CDBG PROGRAMS 3,215 10,000 10,000 10,000
Total Expenditures 183,977 427,504 427,504 489,091

RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE - - - -
Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 183,977 427,504 427,504 489,091

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY FUND 41
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 208,985 217,296 217,296 204,955

REVENUES
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,857 1,000 13,500 10,000
358 MISC GRANTS (COPS) 165,271 165,000 186,159 190,000
Total Revenue 166,000 172,128 199,659 200,000
Total Available Funds 383,296 381,113 416,955 404,955

EXPENDITURES
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 163,817 199,887 212,000 212,000 Total Expenditures 163,817 199,887 212,000 212,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 217, 183,409 296 204,955 192,955 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 381,113 383,296 416,955 404,955

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
GOLF COURSE FUND 53
ASSIGNED FB RECEIVABLES OVER PAYABLES 46,477
ASSIGNED FB RESTRICTED FOR CAPITAL 596,157 596,157 596,157 921,157 ASSIGNED FB RESTRICTED FOR GC WATER/IMP 466,912 466,912 466,912 466,912 1,063,069 1,063,069 1,063,069 1,388,069

REVENUES
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 799,000 993,836 817,000 822,000 369 CONTRIBUTIONS 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000
Total Revenue 959,000 1,153,836 977,000 982,000
Total Available Funds 1,425,912 1,620,748 1,443,912 1,448,912 EXPENDITURES (4410)
021 TRAVEL & MEETING - - - -
022 UTILITIES 292,800 187,657 255,000 255,000
023 CONTRACT SERVICES 495 57,000 - 12,000
026 INTEREST PAYMENTS 158,933 302,200 397,000 385,000
Total Expenditures 347,086 652,000 652,000 652,000
ASSIGNED FB RECEIVABLES OVER PAYABLES 45,965 - - -
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE CAPITAL 596,157 1,209,157 921,157 1,251,157 ASSIGNED FB RESTRICTED FOR GC WATER/IMP 466,912 466,912 466,912 466,912 Assigned Capital Fund Balance 1,109,034 1,676,069 1,388,069 1,718,069 Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 943,243 1,861,157 1,573,157 1,903,157

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 70
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 1,366,663 1,186,817 1,186,817 915,045

REVENUE
391 SALE OF PROPERTY 20,940 - - -
500 TRANSFER IN FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 - - - - Total Revenue - 20,940 - - Total Available Funds 1,186,817 1,387,603 1,186,817 915,045 EXPENDITURES (4314)
039 VEHICLES/RIDING EQUIPMENT & OUTFITTING 64,213 183,348 181,722 25,500 041 CAPITAL OUTLAY (TECHNOLOGY & EQUIPMENT) 136,573 308,716 90,050 166,000 Total Expenditures 200,786 492,064 271,772 191,500
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 694,753 1,186,817 915,045 723,545 Total Estimated Requirements
and Assigned Fund Balance 1,387,603 1,186,817 1,186,817 915,045

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
AQMD FUND 71
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 299, 335,295 567 335,295 104,055

REVENUE
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,000 7,289 2,000 2,000
358 MISC GRANTS (AQMD ENTITLEMENTS) 56,530 45,000 55,000 55,000 Total Revenue 47,000 63,819 57,000 57,000
Total Available Funds 363, 382,295 386 392,295 161,055
EXPENDITURES (4190)
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 26,091 486,131 286,240 69,055
929 Crosswalks and Pedestrian Improvements - - - 70,000 099 TRANSFER OUT TO THE GENERAL FUND 001 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total Expenditures 488,131 28,091 288,240 141,055
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 335, (105,836) 295 104,055 20,000 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 363,386 382,295 392,295 161,055

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
PROP A TRANSIT FUND 72
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,628,449 6,078,888 6,078,888 6,383,716

REVENUE
312 SALES TAXES (PROP A) 893,758 992,810 992,810 958,528 341 USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY 5,000 65,392 255,293 200,000 391 SALE OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 4,044,551 - - -
395 OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE 2,218 2,500 2,000 2,000
Total Revenue 1,000,310 5,005,919 1,250,103 1,160,528
Total Available Funds 7,079,198 6,634,368 7,328,991 7,544,244 EXPENDITURES (4120)
016 PUBLICATION & DUES 3,500 - 3,500 3,500
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 102,400 102,400 102,500 102,400 EXPENDITURES (4125)
433 GET ABOUT SERVICES 205,276 205,275 205,275 289,186
434 RECREATIONAL TRANSIT 43,189 85,000 85,000 90,000
442 SR. HANDICAP BUS BUYDOWN 5,600 10,000 10,000 10,000 445 DIAL A CAB 258,000 147,750 258,000 114,360
453 PARK & RIDE 205,050 49,665 141,000 375,000
455 BUS STOPS 100,000 1,601 100,000 120,000
EXPENDITURES (4841)
691 BUS STOP ENHANCEMENTS - 44,000 40,000 -
Total Expenditures 555,480 1,013,225 945,275 1,104,446
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 6,065,973 6,078,888 6,383,716 6,439,798 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 6,634,368 7,079,198 7,328,991 7,544,244

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
PROP C TRANSIT FUND 73
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,622,476 2,793,040 1,622,476 1,624,896

REVENUE
312 SALES TAX (PROP C) 741,347 823,510 823,510 795,073
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 10,000 65,094 56,910 45,000 Total Revenue 833,510 806,441 880,420 840,073
Total Available Funds 2,455,986 3,599,481 2,502,896 2,464,969 EXPENDITURES (4120)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35,470 100,000 60,000 25,000
EXPENDITURES (4125)
453 GOLDLINE ART IMPROVEMENTS - 20,000 - -
EXPENDITURES (4841)
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,000 72,000 72,000 70,000
554 PAVEMENT 40,000 - - -
557 VIA VERDE AVE. 1,939,535 - - -
601 LONE HILL AVE. 746,500 - 746,000 -
639 BADILLO ST. 120,000 - - 120,000
652 ARROW HWY - - - 700,000
660 BONITA AVE - - - 75,000
667 COVINA BLVD. - - - -
Total Expenditures 1,977,005 1,098,500 878,000 990,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,622,476 1,357,486 1,624,896 1,474,969 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 3,599,481 2,455,986 2,502,896 2,464,969

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
MEASURE R TRANSIT FUND 74
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,885,887 1,426,709 1,426,709 1,674,891

REVENUE
312 SALES TAX (MEASURE R) 555,850 617,632 617,632 596,305 341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,000 38,174 57,000 50,000
Total Revenue 622,632 594,024 674,632 646,305
Total Available Funds 2,049,341 2,479,911 2,101,341 2,321,196

EXPENDITURES
554 PAVEMENT 269,091 - - 384,000
557 VIA VERDE AVE 470,212 - - -
616 STREET MAINTENANCE - 149,622 30,000 150,000
639 BADILLO 55,000 - - 255,000
640 VIA VAQUERO - 579,440 - -
642 EATON RD 396,450 3,550 396,450 -
929 SAN DIMAS CANYON RD - - - 150,000
Total Expenditures 1,053,202 870,163 426,450 939,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,179,178 1,426,709 1,674,891 1,382,196 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 2,479,911 2,049,341 2,101,341 2,321,196

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE FUND 75
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE BOULEVARD 1,381 5,531 (4,797) 1,381 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE NORTHWOODS 4,885 (6,643) 10,040 4,885 TOTAL RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE (1,112) 6,266 6,266 5,243

REVENUES
371 ASSESSMENTS 45,868 46,638 45,595 45,940
500 TRANFERS FRO THE GENERAL FUND 001 5,974 28,000 5,974 1,817 Total Revenue 73,868 52,612 51,569 47,757
Total Available Funds 72,756 58,878 57,835 53,000

EXPENDITURES
BOULEVARD (4440)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,962 5,907 5,907 6,111
022 UTILITIES 12,565 9,961 12,565 12,565
Sub-total Boulevard 14,923 18,472 18,472 18,676
NORTHWOODS (4443)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30,412 20,442 20,422 21,239
022 UTILITIES 13,698 21,155 13,698 13,085
Sub-total Northwoods 51,567 34,140 34,120 34,324
Total Expenditures 52,612 66,490 52,592 53,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE BOULEVARD 1,381 521 (4,797) (9,856) RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE NORTHWOODS 4,885 5,745 10,040 9,856 TOTAL RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 6,266 6,266 5,243 -
Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 72,756 58,878 57,835 53,000

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
MEASURE M FUND 76
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 2,096,499 2,285,710 2,285,710 2,024,471

REVENUE
312 SALES TAX (MEASURE M) 628,785 699,983 699,983 675,812 341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 52,149 5,000 92,000 80,000
Total Revenue 704,983 680,934 791,983 755,812
Total Available Funds 2,990,693 2,777,433 3,077,693 2,780,283

EXPENDITURES
554 PAVEMENT 125,000 - 125,000 15,000
557 VIA VERDE 361,556 328,444 85,000 -
601 LONE HILL 311,137 - 311,137 -
640 VIA VAQUERO - 150,000 - -
641 DERBY KENT 79,621 11,129 11,265 -
642 EATON RD 497,850 2,150 497,850 -
652 ARROW HWY - - - 400,000
667 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN - - - 60,000
929 SAN DIMAS AVE 22,970 - 22,970 -
Total Expenditures 491,723 1,398,134 1,053,222 475,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,592,559 2,285,710 2,024,471 2,305,283 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 2,777,433 2,990,693 3,077,693 2,780,283

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
ROAD MAINT. REHAB ACT FUND 77
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 1,427,184 1,469,235 1,469,235 416,629

REVENUE
312 SALES TAX (RMRA LOCAL RETURN) 863,775 779,818 836,569 894,248 341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 26,762 9,000 45,000 30,000
Total Revenue 872,775 806,580 881,569 924,248
Total Available Funds 2,342,010 2,233,764 2,350,804 1,340,877

EXPENDITURES
554 PAVEMENT 300,000 - 300,000 600,000
601 LONEHILL 703,075 11,640 703,075 -
637 GLADSTONE/PEARLANNA & BILLOW 10,772 589,228 400,000 - 640 VIA VAQUERO 400,000 300,000 400,000 -
641 DERBY KENT 6,063 393,937 - -
642 EATON RD 150,720 29,280 20,000 -
660 BONITA AVE 111,100 18,900 111,100 -
Total Expenditures 764,529 2,260,186 1,934,175 600,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 81,824 1,469,235 416,629 740,877 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 2,233,764 2,342,010 2,350,804 1,340,877

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
MEASURE W FUND 78
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 871,807 1,335,585 1,335,585 401,141

REVENUE
311 PROPERTY TAX (SAFE CLEAN WATER) 597,016 598,000 598,421 598,450 341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,000 45,473 117,000 100,000 359 STATE GRANT 675,000 60,766 675,000 -
Total Revenue 1,278,000 703,255 1,390,421 698,450
Total Available Funds 2,613,585 1,575,062 2,726,006 1,099,591 EXPENDITURES (4120/4341/4841)
039 VEHICLES/RIDING EQUIPMENT & OUTFITTING 250,000 - 250,000 - 020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - - -
024 NPDES 372,966 160,576 208,000 194,000
601 LONE HILL PARK (DESIGN) 1,514,234 60,766 1,475,000 - 813 STORM DRAINS 391,865 18,135 391,865 300,000
Total Expenditures 239,477 2,529,065 2,324,865 494,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 84,520 1,335,585 401,141 605,591 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 1,575,062 2,613,585 2,726,006 1,099,591

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
Capital Assets Reserve 100
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 6,500,000 6,500,000 6,500,000 7,567,149

REVENUE
500 TRANSFERS IN FROM THE GENERAL FUND 001 - 1,595,000 1,595,000 1,630,000 Total Revenue 1,595,000 - 1,595,000 1,630,000
Total Available Funds 8,095,000 6,500,000 8,095,000 9,197,149 EXPENDITURES (4314)
039 VEHICLES/RIDING EQUIPMENT & OUTFITTING - 737,851 489,701 660,000 041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 221,650 - 38,150 220,000
Total Expenditures 959,501 - 527,851 880,000
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 7,135,499 6,500,000 7,567,149 8,317,149 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 6,500,000 8,095,000 8,095,000 9,197,149

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
ARPA FUND 101
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 4,034,278 2,051,110 4,034,278 -

REVENUE
359 FEDERAL GRANT (ARPA) - 4,021,429 - -
Total Revenue - 4,021,429 - -
Total Available Funds 4,034,278 6,072,539 4,034,278 -
EXPENDITURES (4190)
010 ADVERTISING 67,000 - 67,000 -
014 INSURANCE 679,752 - 679,752 -
015 EQUIPMENT 70,211 - 50,000 -
016 PUBLICATION & DUES 42,995 - 42,995 -
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 553,192 373,672 382,715 -
030 COMPUTER SUPPLIES - - - -
035 TECHNOLOGY SUBSCRIPTIONS & LICESENSES 426,001 287,033 352,956 - 038 EQUIPMENT (PUBLIC ACCESS) - 15,000 - -
EXPENDITURES (4210)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRACT LAW) 1,600,000 596,573 1,158,993 - 413 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 224,783 - 224,783 -
EXPENDITURES (4310)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRACT LAW) 200,000 89,919 75,000 - EXPENDITURES (4311)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRACT LAW) 160,000 96,325 160,000 - EXPENDITURES (4314)
039 EQUIPMENT 184,000 - 171,000 -
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY 104,147 150,715 134,000 -
EXPENDITURES (4342)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRACT LAW) - 65,000 65,000 - EXPENDITURES (4410)
023 CONTRACT SERVICES 59,900 90,822 87,257 -
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY
EXPENDITURES (4411)
023 CONTRACT SERVICES 52,129 124,377 74,680 -
EXPENDITURES (4412)
023 CONTRACT SERVICES 45,243 58,730 58,730 -
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY
EXPENDITURES (4414)
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,583 44,814 44,814 -
023 CONTRACT SERVICES 94,417 111,583 111,583 -
041 CAPITAL OUTLAY
EXPENDITURES (4420)
034 RECREATION PROGRAMS 101,943 - - -
EXPENDITURES (4430)
023 CONTRACT SERVICES 87,330 93,020 93,020 -
EXPENDITURES (4841)
927 HORSE THEIF CANYON PARK 26,046 - - -
Total Expenditures 2,038,261 4,946,995 4,034,278 -
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE (912,717) 4,034,278 - -
Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 6,072,539 4,034,278 4,034,278 -

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 2024-25

ACTUAL APPROVED REVISED PROPOSED

BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET
Housing Authority Trustee Administration Fund 113
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 6,154,033 5,675,830 6,273,561 6,919,461

REVENUE
341 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,990,809 1,825,000 1,820,000 1,825,000 356 GRANTS 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000
369 REIMBURSEMENT (BOND DEBT) 487,918 - 487,918 -
Total Revenue 3,325,000 2,478,727 2,307,918 3,325,000
Total Available Funds 9,479,033 8,154,557 8,581,479 10,244,461 EXPENDITURES (4120/4411)
012 CAR ALLOWANCE 3,000 - - -
014 INSURANCE 15,000 - 15,000 14,232
020 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 916,782 3,350,000 595,000 3,715,600 033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES - 1,000 1,000 1,000
049 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 487,917 486,688 486,688 487,107 101 FULL TIME PERSONNEL SALARIES 135,984 215,871 203,250 265,086 200 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40,313 82,500 61,080 94,836
506 OPERATION OF PROPERTY 300,000 550,000 300,000 300,000 Total Expenditures 1,880,996 4,704,059 1,662,018 4,877,861 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 4,774,974 6,273,561 6,919,461 5,366,600 Total Estimated Requirements
and Restricted Fund Balance 8,154,557 9,479,033 8,581,479 10,244,460

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

ANNUAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET

ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION 2024-46

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 WHEREAS, the City Manager has presented to the San Dimas City Council a proposed budget for Fiscal Year July 1, 2024- June 30 ,2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Dimas has conducted a public meeting on April 23, 2024 and on May 14, 2024, to consider the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget document; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Dimas has concluded its review and intends to approve and adopt the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget for the City and the Capital Improvement Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby resolve that:

SECTION 1. The proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget document entitled "2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget" and filed with the City Clerk with an expenditure budget of $63,763,339, as prepared and submitted by the City Manager and as modified by the City Council, is hereby approved, adopted, and appropriated.

SECTION 2. The City Council recognizes that the proposed 2024-25 budget will require adjustments from time to time, and accordingly, the City Manager or his designee is authorized to act in accordance with established budget policies and procedures.

SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is instructed to forward a copy of the Resolution and the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget to the Auditor/Controller of the County of Los Angeles, in accordance with Section 53901 of the Government Code.

SECTION 4. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or his designee to correct any identified errors and omissions in the proposed 2024-25 budget document entitled "2024-25Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget" that relates to supporting information, descriptions, graphics, charts, definitions or spelling errors.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th, day of June 2024. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor

Resolution 2024-46 Page 2
Adopt FY 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget June 11,2024
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk
I, Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024-46 was adopted by the City Council of San Dimas at its regular meeting of June 11th, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
From: Chris Constantin, City Manager
Subject: Approve Resolution 2024-43, Approving A Five-Year Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for Public Services Provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and Authorizing the City Manager to Procure Services of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Up to an Amount Authorized in the City’s Operating and Capital Budget for the Period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029 ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The current Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement (MLESA) between the City of San Dimas and the County of Los Angeles is set to expire on June 30, 2024. In preparation, a new five-year agreement has been drafted for the City Council's review and approval, with the next term starting on July 1, 2024, and concluding on June 30, 2029. Over the past year, a subcommittee from the California Contract Cities Association (CCCA), consisting of City Managers, collaborated with the County and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) to negotiate and revise the MLESA. The requested action and documents would implement a new five-year MLESA with the County to provide law enforcement services from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029.

RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends the City Council:
• Approve Resolution 2024-43 approving the 5-Year Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029, and • Authorize the Mayor to execute the 5-Year Agreement on behalf of the City.

FISCAL IMPACT
Changes to the MLESA does not alter the cost structure of the previous agreement. Rates for law enforcement services are provided annually by the County of Los Angeles Auditor/Controller and are determined based on the fully burdened cost of deploying service units, including variables such as salary, benefits, equipment (vehicles, radios, maintenance, etc.), management overhead,

Approve Resolution 2024-43 Approving a Five-Year Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for Public Services Provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Page 2
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
vacation and sick relief, detective services, dispatch and front desk personnel, station jailer services, and civilian positions.

In 2023-24, the general law enforcement services cost $8,611,678.52. For 2024-25, the City will procure the same number of resources, with estimated costs increasing by 3.94%. This is made up of a 3.44% increase for a deputy service unit[1] plus a 0.5% increase to the Liability Trust Fund (Liability Trust fund will go from 12% to 12.5% of personnel cost). The 2024-25 cost is estimated to be about $8.95 million.
[1] Actual percentages may vary based on the type of service unit (i.e. patrol deputy, bonus deputy, or sergeant)

BACKGROUND
The current Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement (MLESA) between the City of San Dimas and the County of Los Angeles is set to expire on June 30, 2024. In preparation, a new five-year agreement has been drafted for the City Council's review and approval, with the next term starting on July 1, 2024, and concluding on June 30, 2029.

Over the past year, a subcommittee from the California Contract Cities Association (CCCA), consisting of City Managers, collaborated with the County and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) to negotiate and revise the MLESA. The proposed agreement includes revisions that were mutually agreed upon by the County and the CCCA subcommittee (see Attachment 1 Exhibit A and C).

In addition to the MLESAs approved over the past few decades, the contract cities have entered into three significant agreements concerning liability and indemnification for County services:
• 1977 Assumption of Liability: The County established a fund to cover liability costs associated with contract services, assuming liability and defense for contract cities (replaced by the 1991 Joint Indemnity Agreement for law enforcement services, see Attachment 2). • 1991 Joint Indemnity Agreement: The County and cities established the structure of the Liability Trust Fund, transferring responsibility for liability and payment for settlements and claims to this fund, which is fully funded by contract cities. (see Attachment 3). • 2009 Special Indemnity Agreement: The County and cities agreed to split the liability and funding responsibility equally for certain cases involving deputies or other peace officers incurring felony convictions or any criminal convictions of certain sexual crimes (see Attachment 4).

While the County accepted some of the recommended subcommittee changes, there were a number of changes that were not accepted. Additionally, no agreement on changes to liability and indemnity language was reached prior to the renewal deadline. As was added in the MLESA as Section 5.4, the subcommittee and County will continue discussions intended to revise liability and indemnity language to share in the financial exposure with the County instead of the current burden falling completely on the Liability Trust Fund, and by extension, the contract cities.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS

Approve Resolution 2024-43 Approving a Five-Year Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for Public Services Provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Page 3
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
Contracting for law enforcement services in Los Angeles County dates back to 1954 when the City of Lakewood first contracted with the County. Currently, 42 cities contract with the County through the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department for primary and supplemental law enforcement services, representing almost half of the 88 Los Angeles cities.

Authority to Contract for Law Enforcement Services
Under California Government Code Section 51301 et seq, the City has the authority to contract with the County for public safety services. The term of any such contract shall not exceed five years but may be renewed for subsequent five-year periods, provided a decision to continue is made at least a year before the expiration of any current term. The upcoming MLESA is a fiveyear agreement requiring approval by June 30, 2024, to continue services.

County Can Recover Costs for Contract Services
According to California Government Code Section 51350, the County must charge the contracting city for all costs incurred due to the agreement. This excludes any indirect overhead charges or costs attributed to services provided countywide or are general county government operational overheads. Thus, the County’s Auditor/Controller established a complex formula to set the price of each contract service unit, and the Liability Trust Fund Claims Board [1] determined the recommended funding level for the liability component based on an actuarial study. Together, these two components form the total cost per service unit assessed to the contract cities for each service unit procured.

City Orders Law Enforcement Resources from the County
Annually, the City issues a Service Level Authorization, commonly referred to as the “575 form,” which specifies the resources provided to the City (See Attachment 1 Exhibit B for the City’s 2023-24 575 form). These resources include sworn deputies, non-sworn personnel, public safety equipment, and standard deployment of sworn personnel. The form details the costs associated with each service unit and their quantities, and annually, replaced Attachment A and B within the five-year MLESA.

For 2023-24, the City procured 20 personnel resources and 2 license plate readers for the traffic units. The resources included various types of deputies and civilian personnel, with a total service provision of 2,628,540 sworn minutes and 214,680 civilian minutes at a cost of $8,611,678.52.

This includes a 12% charge to the Liability Trust Fund to cover settlements and claims arising from MLESA operations.

For 2024-25, the City will procure the same number of resources, with estimated costs increasing by 3.94%.

Changes to the 2024-2029 MLESA
The included MLESA includes several changes based on the contract cities negotiations which are beneficial to the City. The changes include:
• Performance will be by Service Unit Rather than Overall – Agreement performance standard changes from one measure overall to several measures at the service unit

Approve Resolution 2024-43 Approving a Five-Year Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for Public Services Provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Page 4
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
level. As the MLESA performance is based on service minutes, the number of deputies and civilians procured by a city are translated into available minutes. This allows the County to mix and match minutes to achieve their 98-102% target but can lead to unintended consequences to underperform in areas like traffic, special assignment, or motor units.
o Benefit: The change would set the 98-102% performance target for each specific unit – patrol, motor, special assignment deputies increasing accountability to cities receiving the level of service expected when procuring specific resources. As an example, overages in patrol minutes cannot be made up by reducing service levels of a motor unit or special assignment deputy and vice versa. • Retaining Vehicle of Deleted Service Unit – When a city adds a new resource that requires a vehicle (i.e. new deputy), the city incurs a significant first-year expense for the additional vehicle required for this new deputy. The maintenance and replacement costs of the vehicle are already integrated into the annual charge to the city if the city keeps the new deputy. While the LASD has a practice on this, the language of the MLESA was not explicit to protect a city from losing a deputy temporarily and then paying another new vehicle cost when the city restored the deputy. The MLESA adds language that a city can regain access to a vehicle procured with a new deputy service unit when the unit is deleted and restored within 24 months.
o Benefit: This codifies the language and extends it from 12 to 24 months giving more flexibility for a city to avoid incurring a new vehicle cost • Transfer of City Property to County – Agreement requires separate written agreements managed at the LASD contract city stations to govern items purchased by the City and temporarily transferred to the County. Additionally, the County must maintain a detailed and regularly updated inventory of all non-vehicle City equipment in its possession, including descriptions, serial numbers (if applicable), condition upon receipt, and location. o Benefit: This language increases transparency and accountability in the handling of the City’s assets where the MLESA was previously silent. • Equipment Replacement after Extended Maintenance and Repair – Agreement requires that the County will make best efforts to provide a temporary replacement if the original equipment takes more than 60 days to be returned. o Benefit: The language strengthens the required effort the County must undertake to provide a replacement. A best effort would require the LASD to be more diligent in providing a replacement· Continue Negotiations on Indemnity Agreements – Agreement includes Section 5.4 which acknowledges indirectly the continued negotiations between the County and contract cities related to concerns that cities bear the full cost of liability for contract activities when the County should share in such liability. A Letter of Understanding between the County and the California Contract Cities Association outlines how both parties will work towards addressing concerns in several areas raised by contract cities.

Approve Resolution 2024-43 Approving a Five-Year Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for Public Services Provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Page 5
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
o Benefit: The language does not guarantee a change, but it recognizes a mutual interest in ensuring the long-term viability of the Liability Trust Fund and controlling the increasing burden placed on cities for activities a city does not control. The County controls aspects of law enforcement operations (i.e. training, supervision, hiring, discipline, etc.) and to some extent should incur some of the liability, such as when there is gross negligence not controllable by a city. Further negotiations are a positive step.

Liability Trust Fund Claims Board
As established in the 1991 Joint Indemnity Agreement, the County formed the Los Angeles Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board (Board) [2] to review and approve settlement of claims and lawsuits for money damages which are paid from the County’s Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund. The Board consists of eleven members nominated by the California Contract Cities Association and appointed by the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors. The members include city council members, city managers, and representatives from the California Contract Cities Association.

The Liability Trust Fund is comprised of two funds – the Sheriff's Department Fund and the AllOther Departments fund. This is a County trust account funded by contract cities to reimburse the County for all costs related contract city operations leading to litigation and settlements as a part of MLESA operations. The Liability Trust Fund is self-insured for liabilities up to $10 million and carries insurance up to $50 million.

The Liability Trust Fund has experienced significant payouts due to settlements and litigation work. The settlements are such a large exposure that insurers have been increasing the selfinsurance retention (amount paid from the fund before tapping insurance) of $2 million in 2011- 12 to $10 million in 2023-24, and the rate paid by contract cities has risen from 4% to 12%, respectively, and will be 12.5% in 2024-25.

Given that all activities of the contract cities in the MLESA are the responsibility of the County and contract cities have no authority to govern over actions to reduce liability, the subcommittee feels strongly of the need to revisit the liability and indemnity relationship between the contract cities and the County to ensure balance in who pays for settlements and litigations. The purpose is to ensure the long-term viability of the Liability Trust Fund and the contract model. Further, with the County being exposed to more financial risk associated with operations that only they can control, there will be a greater incentive to ensure more risk reduction approaches and opportunities are leveraged to reduce the overall losses incurred by both the County and the contract cities.

While the subcommittee proposed changes to liability and indemnity language, the County desired additional time to discuss and consider changes. Consequently, the subcommittee will be continuing discussions on amending this language even after the MLESA is approved by the June 30, 2024, deadline, with the existing liability and indemnity language in place since the last MLESA.
[2] Board of city councilmembers, city managers, and California contract cities to review and recommend settlements to claims filed related to contract city activity performed by the County.

Approve Resolution 2024-43 Approving a Five-Year Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for Public Services Provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Page 6
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024

ALTERNATIVES
Not Applicable. The City Council has not directed a change in law enforcement services. Thus, the City does not have an alternative to consider ensuring continuous law enforcement services starting July 1, 2024.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Chris Constantin
City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2024-43, MLESA Agreement

2. 1977 Assumption of Liability Agreement

3. 1991 Joint Indemnity Agreement

4. 2009 Special Indemnity Agreement

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2024-43

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY

OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING A FIVE-YEAR MUNICIPAL LAW

ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES FOR PUBLIC SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO PROCURE SERVICES OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ANNUALLY UP TO AN AMOUNT AUTHORIZED IN THE CITY’S OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2024 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2029
WHEREAS, The City of San Dimas, California (City) and the County of Los Angeles (County) have previously entered into a Municipal Law Enforcement Service Agreement (MLESA) whereby the County through its Sheriff’s Department (LASD) provides general and additional law enforcement services within the jurisdiction of the City; and WHEREAS, the current MLESA expires on June 30, 2024, and the City desires to continue receiving general and additional law enforcement services from the County through the LASD for an additional five years; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to enter into an MLESA for a period starting July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2029 and to procure and allocate funds for such general law and additional services up to such amount appropriated in the City’s Annual Operating and Capital Budgets; and
WHEREAS, the City relies upon the City Manager or designee in partnership with the San Dimas Station Captain of the LASD to implement the MLESA in such manner to best protect the public safety interests of the City of San Dimas and to make such operational changes as necessary to implement the MLESA and fulfill the public safety needs of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby resolve that:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of San Dimas hereby approves the Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement between the City and the County for law enforcement (Exhibit A) and additional services for a five-year period beginning July 1, 2024 and expiring on June 30, 2029.

SECTION 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute the Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement on behalf of the City.

SECTION 3. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to procure annual services up to the appropriated amount provided in the City’s Annual Operating and Capital Budgets and to make any such operational changes to further the public safety interest of the City.

Permanently deleting or adding positions will be brought back to the City Council for authorization and approval.

SECTION 4. The City requests that the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, or its designated agent or agency, approve and authorize the performance of services requested in

Resolution 2024-43 Page 2
Los Angeles County Sheriff Department Agreement
June 11, 2024
this resolution, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the MLESA and any other relevant agreement(s).

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall attest and certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June 2024. __________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk
I, Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024-43 was approved by vote of the City Council of the City of San Dimas at its regular meeting of June 11, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
AND CITY OF _____________

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE PAGE
RECITALS............................................................................................................. 1

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES…………............................................................ 1

2.0 ADMINISTRATION OF PERSONNEL................................................. 2

3.0 DEPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL......................................................... 3

4.0 PERFORMANCE OF AGREEMENT.................................................... 6

5.0 INDEMNIFICATION............................................................................... 7

6.0 TERM OF AGREEMENT........................................................................ 8

7.0 RIGHT OF TERMINATION................................................................... 9

8.0 BILLING RATES….................................................................................. 9

9.0 PAYMENT PROCEDURES.................................................................... 10

10.0 NOTICES……………………................................................................... 11

11.0 AMENDMENTS…………….................................................................... 11

12.0 AUTHORIZATION WARRANTY......................................................... 12

13.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT.......................................................................... 12 SIGNATURES....................................................................................................... 13 ATTACHMENT A: Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form
ATTACHMENT B: Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet
ATTACHMENT C: Public Safety Equipment Use Requirements

1 MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
AND CITY OF _________
This Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this ______ day of __________________, 2024 by and between the County of Los Angeles ("County") and the City of _________ ("City").

RECITALS
A. Whereas, the City is desirous of contracting with the County for the performance of municipal law enforcement services by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department ("Sheriff's Department"); and
B. Whereas, the County is agreeable to rendering such municipal law enforcement services on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and C. Whereas, this Agreement is authorized by Sections 56½ and 56¾ of the County Charter and California Government Code Section 51301.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the parties mutually agree as follows:

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.1 The County, by and through the Sheriff's Department, agrees to provide general law enforcement services within the corporate limits of the City to the extent and in the manner hereinafter set forth in this Agreement.

1.2 Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Agreement, such services shall only encompass duties and functions of the type coming within the jurisdiction of and customarily rendered by the Sheriff's Department under the County Charter, State of California statutes, and the City municipal codes.

1.3 General law enforcement services performed hereunder may include, if requested by the City, supplemental security support, supplemental sworn officer support, and supplemental professional civilian support staff.

2 2.0 ADMINISTRATION OF PERSONNEL

2.1 During the term of this Agreement, the Sheriff or his designee shall serve as the Chief of Police of the City and shall perform the functions of the Chief of Police at the direction of the City.

2.2 The rendition of the services performed by the Sheriff's Department, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed shall remain with the County. The City understands and agrees that, at the Sheriff’s Department’s sole discretion, the Sheriff’s Department may redeploy personnel for mutual aid purposes pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, codified at California Government Code Sections 8550-8668. Absent exigent circumstances, any sustained deployment of more than fifty percent (50%) of the City’s contracted items, with the calculation determined by service unit type, requires consultation with the City manager or his/her designee. For the purpose of this section, exigent circumstances are defined as such cases where the immediacy of deployment is of such nature where prior consultation is materially detrimental to public safety and the length of such deployment does not exceed 24 hours.

2.3 In the event of a dispute between the parties to this Agreement as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the minimum level or manner of performance of such service, the City shall be consulted and a mutual determination thereof shall be made by both the Sheriff's Department and the City.

The City shall first consult with the Station Captain, Division Commander, and Division Chief, in an effort to reach a mutual determination. If a mutual determination cannot be realized at a subordinate level, then the matter will be elevated to a Sheriff’s Department Assistant Sheriff or the Sheriff.

2.4 With regard to Paragraphs 2.2 and 2.3 above, the Sheriff's Department, in an unresolved dispute, shall have final and conclusive determination as between the parties hereto.

2.5 All City employees who work in conjunction with the Sheriff’s Department pursuant to this Agreement shall remain employees of the City and shall not have

3 any claim or right to employment, civil service protection, salary, or benefits or claims of any kind from the County based on this Agreement. No City employees as such shall become employees of the County unless by specific additional agreement in the form of a merger agreement which must be concurrently adopted by the City and the County. The Sheriff’s Department will provide approved City employees with the required training necessary to access authorized County programs (i.e. CAD, MDC, etc.), so such City employees can perform the functions of their positions.

2.6 While performing law enforcement services and functions under this Agreement, every Sheriff’s Department employee shall be authorized to enforce all City laws and regulations, including all City codes and ordinances.

2.7 The City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any Sheriff's Department salaries, wages, or other compensation to any County personnel performing services hereunder for the City. Except as herein otherwise specified, the City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any County employee or agent of the County for injury or sickness arising out of the performance of services under this Agreement.

2.8 As part of its compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to employee hiring, the County agrees that the County Civil Service Rules to which it is subject and which prohibit discrimination on the basis of non-merit factors, shall for purposes of this Agreement be read and understood to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

3.0 DEPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL

3.1 Services performed hereunder and specifically requested by the City shall be developed in conjunction with the Sheriff's Department and indicated on Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement.

3.2 The City, or its designated representative, shall meet with its respective Sheriff's Department Station Captain when requesting law enforcement services to be performed in the City, and provide direction to the Sheriff's Department Station Captain regarding the method of deployment for such services. The City and the

4 Sheriff’s Department shall also determine a minimum daily standard of staffing needs for services rendered to ensure an adequate personnel presence during station operation and patrol. The City and the Station Captain shall meet to discuss the minimum daily standard which is documented in Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement. The Station Captain shall endeavor to meet this standard without increased cost to the City. The Sheriff's Department shall ensure that all services are delivered in a manner consistent with the priorities, annual performance objectives, and goals established by the City.

3.3 The Sheriff's Department shall make every attempt to avoid deployment deficiencies (i.e., “busting” of cars) by following the daily minimum standard of staffing, as stipulated in Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement. Should deployment deficiencies occur, the Sheriff’s Department should make every effort to reallocate those resources to the shift where the deficiencies occurred. Should the Sheriff's Department determine that a temporary increase, decrease, and/or realignment in the deployment methodologies is necessary, the Sheriff's Department shall promptly notify the City of this change in advance. In the event that prior notice is not possible, the City shall be notified of the change within two (2) City business days. If monthly service compliance falls below ninety-eight percent (98%) for each service unit type, then the Sheriff's Department Station Captain shall meet with the City to discuss compliance and identify a plan for resolution. If the quarterly and/or year-to-date (September 30th, December 31st, March 31st, and June 30th) service compliance falls below ninety-eight percent (98%) for each service unit type, then the respective Sheriff's Department Division Chief shall meet with the Sheriff's Department Station Captain and the City to discuss compliance and identify a plan for resolution. If the City is dissatisfied with the outcome of either resolution process, the matter will be elevated to a Sheriff's Department Assistant Sheriff or the Sheriff until all City concerns are fully resolved. Resolution may include, but is not limited to, the use of overtime, staffing adjustments, and/or City-initiated service suspensions, at no additional cost to the

5 City. If the City determines it is unnecessary, the City may waive either dispute resolution process discussed above.

3.3.1 The Sheriff’s Department shall monitor and make every attempt to backfill vacant and impaired (to include loaned) sworn supervisorial overhead positions by the beginning of the following quarter.

3.3.2 The Sheriff’s Department will work with the City to provide an appropriate tool and/or reports to demonstrate adequate service level compliance under this Agreement. Such service level compliance reports include, but not limited to, daily staffing levels, service levels, deployment of service units, daily deputy activity, or similar type data that is reasonably available.

3.4 A new Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement shall be authorized and signed annually by the City and the Sheriff or his designee effective each July 1, and attached hereto as an Amendment to this Agreement.

3.5 Should the City request a change in the level of service other than pursuant to the annual July 1 readjustment, a revised Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement shall be signed and authorized by the City and the Sheriff or his designee and attached hereto as an Amendment to this Agreement.

3.6 The most recent dated and signed Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement shall be the staffing level in effect between the County and the City.

3.7 The City is not limited to the services indicated in Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement. The City may also request any other service or equipment in the field of public safety, law, or related fields within the legal power of the Sheriff’s Department to provide. Such other services and equipment shall be reflected in a revised Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement under the procedures set forth

6 in Paragraphs 3.4 and 3.5 above.

3.8 With regard to any public safety equipment requested by the City and set forth on Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement, the City shall adhere to the terms and conditions set forth in Attachment C, Public Safety Equipment Use Requirements, of this Agreement.

3.9 When a contracted service unit, requiring the procurement of a vehicle at the onset of service, is deleted from the Service Level Authorization (SH-AD-575) , and the City reinstates said service unit within a 24-month period, the City will not be required to procure a vehicle.

4.0 PERFORMANCE OF AGREEMENT

4.1 For the purpose of performing general law enforcement services under this Agreement, the County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, technology, communication facilities, and supplies necessary to maintain the agreed level of service to be rendered hereunder.

4.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may provide additional resources for the County to utilize in performance of the services.

4.2.1 All bailments require a separate Bailment Agreement governing the County’s use of the bailed equipment. Such Bailment Agreements shall be administered at the station level. A bailment is a legal arrangement where one party (City) temporarily transfers possession of specific property or assets to another party (County) to facilitate the provision of certain services.

4.2.2 All donations made by a City to the County will be governed by the most current Sheriff’s Department donation procedures.

4.2.3 The County, through the Sheriff’s Department, acknowledges its obligation to maintain an inventory of all non-vehicle equipment owned by the City (“City Equipment”) provided to the County for its use. The inventory shall include, but not limited to, a detailed description of each item of City Equipment, its serial number (if applicable), its condition upon receipt, and its location. The County shall be responsible for regularly updating and maintaining the inventory of City Equipment, including documenting any changes in the status, condition, or location

7 of equipment. The inventory shall be kept current and accurate at all times during the term of this Agreement. Upon request by the City, the County shall provide access to the inventory records and facilitate any necessary inspections or audit of the City Equipment. The County shall cooperate fully with the City in verifying the accuracy and completeness of the inventory. In the event of loss, damage, or theft of any City Equipment while under the custody or control of the County, the County shall promptly notify the City in writing and provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances surrounding the incident. All inventory records shall be completed and maintained at the station level.

4.3 When and if both parties to this Agreement concur as to the necessity of maintaining a law enforcement headquarters or Sheriff’s Department substation within the City which would not normally be provided by the Sheriff’s Department, the City shall furnish at its own cost and expense all necessary office space, and the Sheriff’s Department shall have authority to negotiate with the City regarding which entity shall pay for furniture and furnishings, office supplies, janitor service, telephone, light, water, and other utilities.

4.4 It is expressly further understood that in the event a local office or building is maintained in the City, such local office or building may be used by the Sheriff’s Department in connection with the performance of its duties in territory outside of the City, provided, however, that the performance of such outside duties shall not be at any additional cost to the City.

4.5 Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is mutually agreed that in all instances where special supplies, stationery, notices, forms, and the like must be issued in the name of the City, the same shall be supplied by the City at its own cost and expense.

5.0 INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 The parties hereto have executed an Assumption of Liability Agreement approved by the County Board of Supervisors on December 27, 1977, and/or a Joint Indemnity Agreement approved by the County Board of Supervisors on October 8, 1991. Whichever of these documents the City has signed later in time is currently in effect and hereby made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement as if set out in full herein.

8 5.2 The parties hereto have also executed a County-City Special Indemnity Agreement approved by the County Board of Supervisors on August 25, 2009. This document is made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement as if set out in full herein.

5.3 In the event the County Board of Supervisors later approves a revised Joint Indemnity Agreement and the City executes the revised agreement, the subsequent agreement as of its effective date shall supersede the agreement previously in effect between the parties hereto.

5.4 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, the indemnification term under this section shall be in effect for a period of nine (9) months, through and including March 31, 2025, with an automatic six-month (6) renewal thereafter, through and including September 30, 2025 (“Indemnification Extension”), unless: (a) this section is amended at any time prior to September 30, 2025; or (b) the entire Agreement is terminated earlier, pursuant to Section 7.0 of this Agreement. If the parties continue to perform under the Agreement after the expiration of the Indemnification Extension without any amendment to this section in accordance with Section 11.0, then the indemnification term under this section will be automatically renewed and incorporated herein for the entire duration of this Agreement.

6.0 TERM OF AGREEMENT

6.1 The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2029, unless sooner terminated or extended as provided for herein.

6.2 At the option of the County Board of Supervisors and with the consent of the City Council, this Agreement may be renewed or extended for successive periods not to exceed five (5) years each.

6.3 Nine (9) months prior to the expiration of this Agreement, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith to discuss the possible renewal or extension of this Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 6.2 above. The parties shall reach an agreement as to the terms of any renewal or extension period no later than six (6) months prior to the expiration of this Agreement. Absent mutual agreement by the parties within that time frame, this Agreement shall expire at the conclusion of the then-existing term.

9 7.0 RIGHT OF TERMINATION

7.1 Either party may terminate this Agreement as of the first day of July of any year upon notice in writing to the other party of not less than one hundred eighty (180) calendar days prior thereto.

7.2 Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City may terminate this Agreement upon notice in writing to the County given within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the County of any increase in the rate for any service to be performed hereunder, and in such an event this Agreement shall terminate sixty (60) calendar days from the date of the City’s notice to the County.

7.3 This Agreement may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, by either party upon written notice given to the other party at least one hundred eighty (180) calendar days before the date specified for such termination.

7.4 In the event of a termination, each party shall fully discharge all obligations owed to the other party accruing prior to the date of such termination, and, except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall be released from all obligations which would otherwise accrue subsequent to the date of termination.

7.5 In the case of termination of this Agreement, the Sheriff will provide only such duties as are required by law.

8.0 BILLING RATES

8.1 The City shall pay the County for the services and equipment provided under the terms of this Agreement at the billing rates set forth on Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet, of this Agreement, as established by the County Auditor-Controller.

8.2 The billing rates set forth on Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet, of this Agreement shall be readjusted by the County Auditor-Controller annually effective July 1 of each year, published by the County, and attached hereto as an Amendment to this Agreement, to reflect the cost of such service in accordance with the policies and procedures for the determination of such rates as adopted by the County Board of Supervisors.

8.3 The City shall be billed at the current fiscal year’s billing rates based on the service level provided within the parameters of Attachment A, Los Angeles County

10 Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement.

8.4 The billing rates for other services and equipment requested pursuant to Paragraph

3.7 of this Agreement and not set forth on Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet, of this Agreement shall be determined by the County Auditor-Controller in accordance with the policies and procedures established by the County Board of Supervisors and then set forth and published on a revised Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet, of this Agreement.

9.0 PAYMENT PROCEDURES

9.1 The County, through the Sheriff's Department, shall render to the City, after the close of each calendar month, a summarized invoice which covers all services performed during said month, and the City shall pay the County for all undisputed amounts within sixty (60) calendar days after date of the invoice.

9.2 If such payment is not delivered to the County office which is described on the invoice within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of the invoice, the County is entitled to recover interest thereon. For all disputed amounts, the City shall provide the County with written notice of the dispute including the invoice date, amount, and reasons for dispute within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the invoice.

The parties shall memorialize the resolution of the dispute in writing. For any disputed amounts, interest shall accrue if payment is not received within sixty (60) calendar days after the dispute resolution is memorialized.

9.3 Interest shall be at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum or any portion thereof, calculated from the invoice due date, or in the case of disputed amounts, calculated from the date the resolution is memorialized.

9.4 Notwithstanding the provisions of California Government Code Section 907, if such payment is not delivered to the County office which is described on said invoice within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of the invoice, or in the case of disputed amounts, from the date the resolution is memorialized, the County may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon, from any funds of the City on deposit with the County without giving further notice to the City of the County's

11 intention to do so.

10.0 NOTICES

10.1 Unless otherwise specified herein, all notices or demands required or permitted to be given or made under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be hand delivered with signed receipt or mailed by first class registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties at the following addresses and to the attention of the person named. Addresses and persons to be notified may be changed by either party by giving ten (10) calendar days prior written notice thereof to the other party.

10.2 Notices to the County shall be addressed as follows:

Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
Contract Law Enforcement Bureau
Attn: Unit Commander
211 W. Temple Street. 7th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90012
Phone #: 213-229-1647

10.3 Notices to the City of shall be addressed as follows:

City of _________
Attn:

Address:

Phone #:

11.0 AMENDMENTS

11.1 Except for changes pursuant to Paragraphs 8.2 and 8.4 of this Agreement, all changes, modifications, or amendments to this Agreement must be in the form of a written Amendment duly executed by the County Board of Supervisors and an authorized representative of the City.

11.2 Notwithstanding Paragraph 11.1 above, the Sheriff or his designee is hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the County, any Amendments and/or supplemental agreements referenced in Sections 3.0, 4.0, and 9.0 of this Agreement.

11.3 In accordance with Paragraphs 8.2 and 8.4 of this Agreement, the Sheriff or his designee is hereby authorized to publish, on behalf of the County, the annual revised Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment

12 Master Rate Sheet, of this Agreement. The revised Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet, of this Agreement shall serve as an Amendment to this Agreement, but shall not require the signature of either party.

12.0 AUTHORIZATION WARRANTY

12.1 The City represents and warrants that the person executing this Agreement for the City is an authorized agent who has actual authority to bind the City to each and every term, condition, and obligation of this Agreement and that all requirements of the City have been fulfilled to provide such actual authority.

12.2 The County represents and warrants that the person executing this Agreement for the County is an authorized agent who has actual authority to bind the County to each and every term, condition, and obligation of this Agreement and that all requirements of the County have been fulfilled to provide such actual authority.

13.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, including Attachment A, Attachment B, and Attachment C, and any Amendments hereto constitute the complete and exclusive statement of understanding of the parties which supersedes all previous agreements, written or oral, and all communications between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. No change to this Agreement shall be valid unless prepared pursuant to Section 11.0, Amendments, of this Agreement.

13 MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
AND CITY OF _________
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Los Angeles, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this Agreement to be executed by the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, and the City has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized representative, on the dates written below.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By ________________________________
ROBERT G. LUNA
Sheriff
Date _______________________________
CITY OF _________
By ________________________________
Date _______________________________
ATTEST:

By__________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DAWYN R. HARRISON CITY ATTORNEY
County Counsel
By _________________________ By _________________________ Principal Deputy County Counsel

1 Attachment C

PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT USE REQUIREMENTS

1.0 TRANSFER OF PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT

1.1 The County, through the Sheriff’s Department, hereby transfers the public safety equipment set forth on Attachment A, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) Form, of this Agreement ("Equipment") for the exclusive use of the City during the term of the Agreement.

2.0 USE OF EQUIPMENT

2.1 The City may use the Equipment for any lawful purpose, including use in connection with public safety activities in all areas under the City’s jurisdiction.

2.2 The City shall not use or operate the Equipment in violation of any federal, state, or local law, rule, regulation, or ordinance.

2.3 The Equipment shall not be used or operated as follows:

2.3.1 In a manner subjecting the Equipment to depreciation above the normal depreciation associated with public safety use; and/or

2.3.2 For an illegal purpose or by a person under the influence of alcohol or narcotics.

3.0 SAFEKEEPING AND MAINTENANCE

3.1 The City shall exercise due care for the safekeeping of the Equipment during the term of the Agreement.

3.2 The City shall ensure that the Equipment is kept in good working order and condition, shall ensure that the Equipment is scheduled and available to County for the performance of its regularly scheduled maintenance by the County, and shall comply in every respect with any manufacturer’s/owner’s manual that comes with the Equipment.

3.3 The County shall perform all maintenance and repairs required for the proper operation of the Equipment. Except as otherwise set forth herein, such maintenance and repairs are provided in exchange for the City's payment of the annual billing rates set forth on Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet, of the Agreement. The City has the right to inspect said Equipment prior to acceptance of the Equipment following maintenance and repairs by the County.

2 3.4 Maintenance and repairs provided by the County under the Agreement may be performed by the County, its third party vendors, and/or the manufacturer of the Equipment.

3.5 The County shall assume responsibility for ensuring that the Equipment has been inspected or otherwise tested in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the United States prior to use by the City.

3.6 The City shall inspect the Equipment upon initial delivery and return from County following maintenance and repair, and, by acceptance thereof, finds the Equipment in good working order and condition.

3.7 The Equipment shall be maintained and repaired solely by the County. The City and any of its third party vendors are prohibited from performing any maintenance and repairs on the Equipment.

3.8 All regularly scheduled maintenance shall be performed by the County, and the City shall timely present the Equipment to the County for the performance of regularly scheduled maintenance at the direction of, and in accordance with the policies and procedures of, the Sheriff's Department's Communications and Fleet Management Bureau. The Sheriff’s Department shall make every effort to perform any maintenance in a timely manner.

3.9 Any Equipment requiring maintenance and repair by the County for any extended length of time, as determined by the Sheriff's Department's Communications and Fleet Management Bureau, will make best efforts to provide a temporary replacement piece of Equipment if such extended time exceeds or is projected to exceed sixty (60) calendar days. All terms and conditions set forth herein shall apply to the City's use of any temporary replacement Equipment provided by the County. The County shall not be responsible for any damages or liability resulting from the City's loss of use of the Equipment during the performance of maintenance and repair services by the County.

4.0 INSPECTION BY COUNTY

4.1 The County shall have the right to inspect the Equipment, immediately upon request by the County, at any time during the term of the Agreement. The City shall provide the County with such operating, and other information, or copies of any such records maintained by the City with respect to the Equipment, as the County or any government agency may require from time to time.

5.0 TITLES

5.1 The County shall retain ownership of the Equipment used by the City during the term of the Agreement. Legal title to the Equipment is, and shall, at all times, remain in the name of the County. The Equipment shall not be transferred or delivered by the City to any persons other than the County without the County’s

3 prior written consent.

6.0 INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 The City agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the County from any and all liability, losses, or damages the County may suffer and from any claims, demands, costs, or judgments against the County arising out of City’s use or operation of the Equipment. This indemnification does not extend to (1) any liability resulting from inherent defects or malfunctions in such Equipment related to manufacturer’s acts or omissions, or (2) negligent or wrongful maintenance or repair of the Equipment provided by the County.

7. RISK OF LOSS

7.1 The City shall assume all risk of loss to the Equipment from the time it is delivered by the County to the City, and inspected and accepted by the City, until (1) the Equipment is returned to the County upon expiration or termination of the Agreement, or (2) the County regains temporary possession of the Equipment for purposes of providing maintenance and repair.

7.2 Upon inspection/acceptance of the Equipment, the City shall be responsible for any and all damage to the Equipment, except those damages resulting from (1) inherent defects or malfunctions in such Equipment related to manufacturer’s acts or omissions, or (2) the negligent or wrongful maintenance or repair of the Equipment provided by the County.

7.3 In the event of damage to the Equipment or the Equipment is in need of repair, the City shall notify the County to that effect and follow such instructions that the County may provide with respect to repair or disposal of the Equipment. If the Equipment is lost, stolen, destroyed, or declared to be a total constructive loss (subject to the County's agreement as to such condition), the City shall properly notify the County thereof and hold any Equipment for disposal by the County.

With respect to any loss, theft, or destruction of the Equipment, the County and the City shall negotiate the value for comparable equipment in a condition similar to the lost, stolen, or destroyed Equipment immediately prior to any such loss.

The City shall reimburse the County for the value of the lost, stolen, or destroyed Equipment.

8.0 BILLING RATES

8.1 As further discussed in Section 8.0, Billing Rates, of the Agreement, the City shall pay the County for the use of the Equipment provided under the Agreement at the annual billing rates set forth on Attachment B, Contract City Law Enforcement Services and Equipment Master Rate Sheet, of the Agreement, as established by the County Auditor-Controller.

I
7o?~
76 EXHIBIT VI
1 ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITY AGREEMENT
2 3 THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only, on the 4 14th day of November, 1977, is made and entered into between 5 the County of Los Angeles, sometimes hereinafter referred to as 6 the “County,” and the City of San Dimas,
i sometimes hereinafter referred to as the “City.”
8 9 RECITALS
(a) City atid County have heretofore contracted for the ii performance of services by County, its officers, agents and 12 employees, and will in the future extend, renew and amend such 13 contracts, and enter into other and further contracts for the 14 performance of services; and
Is (b) Such contracts are agreements defined under §895 of the 16 Government Code, and pursuant to §895.2 thereof joint and several 17 liability is imposed on the parties; and
18 (c) Pursuant to §895.4 of the Government Code the parties 19 as a part of the aforementioned agreements may provide for con20 tributioh or indemnification upon any liability arising out of 21 the performance of the agreement; and
22 (d) The County is willing to assume liability and defend 23 and hold the City harmless from any loss, cost or expense caused 24 by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of County officers, 25 its agents and employees, occurring in the performance of said 26 agreement; and
27 /1/
28 ///
ATTACHMENT 2

76 (e) The City is willing to assume liability and defend and 2 hold the County harmless from loss, cost or expenses caused by 3 the negligent or wrongful act or omission of city officers, agents 4 or employees occurring in the performance of agreements between S the parties, except as hereinafter provided,
6 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
7 1. The County will assume liability and defend and
8 hold the City harmless from loss, costs or expenses caused 9 by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of County 10 officers, agents and employees occurring in the performance 11 of agreements between the parties hereto to the extent that 12 such liability is imposed on the City by the provisions of 13 S895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California. 14 2. The City will assume liability and defend and hold 15 the County harmless from loss, costs or expenses caused by 16 the negligent or wrongful act or omission of City officers, 17 agents and employees occurring in the performance of agree18 ments between the parties hereto to the extent that such 19 liability is imposed on the County by the provisions of 20 §895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California. In 21 addition, when liability arises pursuant to §~83O, et seq., 22 of the Government Code, by reason of a dangerous condition 23 of public property of the City, the City shall assume 24 liability and defend and hold the County harmless from ldss, 25 costs or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful act or 26 omission of City officers, agents and employees, whether 27 /1/
28 /1/
—2-

7~N—(lO/13}-~
1-76
I arising in the performance of an agreement between the 2 parties hereto, with the exception that the County shall 3 assume liability and defend and hold the City harmless from 4 loss, costs or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful 5 act or omission of County officers, agents and employees, 6 occurring in the performance of any agreement between the 7 parties hereto where a duty is imposed on the County pursuant 8 to such agreement to provide maintenance or inspection 9 services pertaining to said property. Where such an agree10 ment between a City and County provides that the County will• 11 provide at least the same level of maintenance or inspection 12 services that the County provides to unincorporated areas, 13 the County will assume liability and defend and hold the City 14 harmless from loss, costs or expense caused by the negligent IS or wrongful act or omission of County officers, agents and 16 employees in failing to provide said services in accordance 17 with said agreement.
18 3. The parties further agree that the Auditor19 Controller of the County shall establish a fund for the pay20 meat of losses for which the County may be liable under the 21 terms of this agreement, and the County agrees to maintain 22 the fund for the purpose of paying such losses which may 23 occur through its performance under agreements to provide 24 city services to the cities within the County.
25 /1/ - -
26 /1/
27 /1/
28 ///
-3-

S
-76
1 4. It is understood by the parties that the fund
2 referred to in paragraph 3 above is under the full control 3 of the Board of Supervisors and reappropriation of unen4 cumbered year-end balances in this fund is discretionary S with the Board of Supervisors.
6 5. The City agrees to make payment to the fund, and
7 the County agrees to require each city receiving services 8 under City Service Agreements to also contribute to the fund. 9 Payments towards the total amount of the fund shall be made 10 by the City in such amounts as may be established by the Auditor-Controller according to the policy and procedure 12 established by the Board of Supervisors, and in the same 13 ratio as the cost of services received by the City is to the 14 total cost to the County for its performance of City Service is Agreements during each fiscal year. In the event that City 16 should elect to terminate its Service Agreement with the 17 County, its responsibility to contribute to the fund pursuant 18 to this agreement shall be limited to payment of amounts 19 which accrue prior to the effective date of said termination. 20 - 6. Each party agrees to fully cooperate with the other 21 and assist the other party hereto in all matters relating to 22 losses covered by the terms of this agreement, and more 23 specifically but not being limited thereby, each .party will:
24 (a) Give prompt notification of all occurrences
25 - covered or likely to be covered by the terms hereof, 26 - together with the particulars thereof to the other party 27 hereto;
28 I/f
-4-

[576N—(lOf73~
11 - 76
1 (b) If claim is made, or suit is brought against
2 a party on occurrences covered or lilcely to be covered 3 by the terms hereof, such party shall immediately
4 forward every claim, demand, notice, summons or other 5 process received by it to the other party hereto.
6 7. Should City agree, stipulate, consent to, or other— 7 wise suffer the granting of any claim, the making of any 8 judgment, order, or other award for damages or other relief 9 against itself or any of its or the County’s officers, 10 agents, or employees in any proceeding or action authorized ii by law involving a matter arising out of the performance by 12 the County of services affected hereby without the prior 13 written consent thereto of the County, the City agrees to 14 indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the County from any Is loss, cost or expense to it arising from such claim, judgmen 16 or other award irrespective of the legal basis upon which 17 liability may be imposed by such action including liability 18 of the County under the provisions of Section 895.2 of the 19 Government Code.
20 8. Any party may at its own cost participate in the
21 defense of any suit, or in the prosecution of any appeal 22 affecting matters herein involved where the duty of defense 23 or prosecution is imposed on the other party, and where the 24 other party has consented thereto.
25 - 9. This cgreement shall apply to and shall be deemed 26 to be a part of all agreements now existing or hereafter 27 f/I
28 III
—5—

YrS76N—(IOI73)-—
1176
I entered into, including amendments, renewals, or other 2 extensions thereof, wherein the City and. County have con3 tracted under circumstances wherein the liability of the City1 4 and County is joint and several under § 895.2 of the Govern— S ment Code of the State of California. The provisions of this~ 6 agreement shall supersede and control over any other provi7 sions inconsistent therewith in any such contract, heretofore~, 8 or hereafter entered into by and between the parties hereto, 9 unless by specific reference therein this Assumption of 10 Liability. Agreement is inapplicable.

II 10. On the effective date of this agreement that cer— 12 tam agreement entitled “Assumption of Liability Amendment,” 13 - if any between the parties, is terminated. The effective 14 date of this agreement is the date executed by the parties, IS but in no event sooner than 12:00 A.M., March 15, 1978, 16 unless the aforementioned Assumption of Liability Amendment 17 should be sooner terminated by the parties, in which event IS the date of such termination shall be the effective date of 19 this agreement. Upon the effective date of this agreement th üme shall continue during the term of any agreement for 21 services to which the same is applicable, unless the County 22 shall sooner elect to terminate this agreement upon thirty 23 days written notice to the City. The County further agrees 24 that this agreement shall be only terminated upon the occur25 rence of the foregoing, or any one or more of the following 26 events: -
27 III
28 III
-6-

~7:J1~I73~ S
1176
I (a) Failure of the City to cooperate with the
2 County as required by this agreement..
3 (b) Upon the City authorizing any judgment, order
4 or other award for damages without the consent of the 5 County in violation of the terms and provisions of this 6 agreement.
7 (c) Upon the County’s election in its absolute
8 discretion to terminate this Assumption of Liability
9 Agreement as to all cities having such service agree10 ments with the County.

II 11. To the extent that the County has agreed to indem12 nify, defend and waive harmless a city, its officers, agents 13 - and employees under this agreement, said obligation shall 14 continue to exist during the term of this agreement whether is - or not there are sufficient funds for such indemnity, defense 16 or hold harmless in the fund established by the Auditor17 Controller. It is further understood that the County may 18 also utilize said fund for the purchase of commercial 19 insurance and claims management services and for the payment 20 of other costs to cover the exposures of the County hereunder 21 in whole or in part.
22 12. On termination by the City of service contract with 23 the County, or upon termination by the County for any cause, 24 the County shall continue to indemnify, defend and hold harm25 less the City for all claims and losses for which liability 26 is imposed -on the County by the terms of this agreement, and 27 III
28 III
—7—

i/li)-
where arising out of the County’s negligent or wrongful act 2 or omission, prior to the effective date of said termination. 3 Said City shall not be entitled to return of any considera4 tion paid by it towards the fund established by the Auditor5 controller on the termination of this agreement. 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this 7 agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers the 8 day and year hereinafter set forth.
9 CITY OF ~5AN/ b/MA—S
- By~~
II Mayor
12 p7
ATTEST this “~{6 day of ~
13 - 197$.

IS City Clerk
16 17 COUNTY QF LOS ANGELES
18 By_____________________________
19 Chairman, Board of Supervisors
I ADGflED ATTEST this 22— day of ~p½gç’ \-\ ,
21 197L
22: JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer23 DEC2 71977 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 24 ,~.,-‘ By__________
26 27
28 a 8

ATTACHMENT 3

CityURTISCouncil W. MORRIS, Mayor
DENIS BERTONE, Mayor Pro Tern

EMMETTBADAR

JEFF TEMPLEMAN

JOHN EBINER
City Manager
BLAINE M. MICHAELIS
Assistant City Manager/ Treasurer
KENNETH J. DURAN
City Attorney
J. KENNETH BROWN
SanD't
caLIFORNiA
f
I ,
July 29, 2009
Sam Olivito, Executive Director
California Contract Cities Association
8119 Somerset Blvd.

Paramount, CA 90723
Dear Mr. Olivito:

Assistant City Manager of
Community Development

LAWRENCE STEVENS
Director of Public Works

KRISHNA PATEL
Director of Development
Services

DAN COLEMAN
Director of Parks
and Recreation

THERESA BRUNS
City Clerk

INA RIOS
I am pleased to report that at their July 28, 2009 meeting, the City Council unanimously approved the County -City Special Indemnity Agreement. Enclosed is the original executed Indemnity Agreement. Please submit a fully executed copy for our files when the process is complete.

Very truly yours,
na Rios, CMC
City Clerk
ir
cc: Blaine Michaelis, City Manager
245 EAST EONITA ATENOE • SAN DIMAS • CALTORM 91773 -3002 • 19001394-0200 • PAZ [ 0081304-6205 ATTACHMENT 4

COUNTY -CITY SPECIAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ( " Agreement "), dated for reference purposes on the day of 2009, is made and entered into between the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the Cities identified in Recital G below, hereinafter cumulatively referred to as the "Cities."

RECITALS
A. Cities, and each of them, and County have heretofore contracted for the performance of law enforcement services to be provided by the County, its officers, agents and employees, known as "Municipal Law Enforcement Services Agreements" which contracts the parties may in the future extend, renew and amend, and enter into other and further contracts for the performance of such services (hereinafter referred to as " MLESA"); and B. Cities and County have heretofore contracted for the indemnification of the Cities by the County, utilizing the Liability Trust Fund ( "LTF ") for the acts and omissions committed by the County's employees in the course and scope of providing services under the MLESA agreements, more particularly described as the Joint Indemnity Agreements or Assumption of Liability Agreements ( hereinafter referred to as " Joint Indemnity Agreements ") which have remained in full force and effect to the present time; and
C. In accordance with the Joint Indemnity Agreements, the County established the LTF, as provided in those agreements. In accordance with the Joint Indemnity Agreements, the Cities, and each of them, are required COCA- COLA.INDEMNTYACR SI'A90727FIN. DOC Page 397 – 567 to pay monies into the LTF. The monies in the LTF are used to reimburse the County for claims, losses, costs and expenses it incurs for which indemnification is provided in the parties' MLESA and /or Joint Indemnity Agreements; and
D. The County withdrew sums from the LTF for the purpose of reimbursing itself for its payment of settlement of claims related to sexual assaults committed by a deputy sheriff (Gonzales) in the years 2002 and 2003 (the "Claims "); and
E. A dispute has arisen between the parties regarding the circumstances under which the County may utilize the funds in the LTF for claims arising from sexual assaults committed by deputy sheriffs employed by the County ( "Sexual Assaults "); and
F. The parties desire to continue the Joint Indemnity Agreements and MLESA agreements, as amended, modified and supplemented from time to time. As further consideration to the Cities, the County is willing to reimburse the LTF for a portion of the sums that are used or may be used by it from the LTF for claims, losses, costs or expenses arising out of certain Sexual Assaults, as defined in Section 2 below, occurring in the performance of the MLESA agreements on the terms and in the manner provided in this Agreement.

G. The Cities that are a party to this Agreement are as follows:

City of Agoura Hills
City of Artesia
City of Avalon
City of Bellflower
City of Bradbury
Citv of Calabasas
CCCA- COLA. S PC INDEMNTYAGR.090727 FIN. DOC 2

City of Carson
City of Cerritos
City of Commerce
City of Compton
City of Diamond Bar
City of Duarte
City of Hawaiian
Gardens
City of Hidden Hills
City of Industry
City of La Canada
City of La Habra Heights
City of La Mirada
City of La Puente
City of Lakewood
City of Lancaster
City of Lawndale
City of Lomita
City of Lynwood
City of Malibu
City of Norwalk
City of Palmdale
City of Paramount
City of Pico Rivera
City of Rancho Palos
Verde
City of Rolling Hills
City of Rolling Hills
Estate
City of Rosemead
City of San Dimas
City of Santa Clarita
City of South El Monte
City of Temple City
City of Walnut
City of West Hollywood
City of Westlake Village
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, it is mutually agreed as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Effective Date.

This Agreement shall be effective as of July 1, 2009. The foregoing notwithstanding, this Agreement shall apply to any claims notice of which is first given to the Liability Trust Fund Oversight Committee after the effective date of this agreement, regardless of the date of occurrence. For purposes of this Agreement "notice" shall mean notification to the Chief Executive Officer of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority and the Executive Director of the California Contract Cities Association, unless otherwise instructed in writing.

2. Indemnity by the County to the City.

CCCA- C0L .A. 090727PIN.SPCINDPMNTYAGR. DOC 3

The parties agree that the maximum liability of the LTF for any losses, claims, costs or expenses related to certain Sexual Assaults, as herein below defined, by deputies or other peace officers in the employ of the County shall be one -half (1/2) of any settlement, judgment or award for such assaults and the costs of defense, including attorneys fees, for such claims or lawsuits. In the event that a withdrawal is made by the County from the LTF for any liability related to certain Sexual Assaults by deputies or other peace officers, as herein below defined, the County shall reimburse the LTF, or, in the event that it has not made a withdrawal of funds from the LTF it shall assume the responsibility to pay from its own funds, one -half (1 / 2) of any amounts necessary to satisfy any judgment, award or settlement not otherwise covered by insurance, if there is any, together with costs of defense, including attorneys fees, under the following circumstances:
a. A felony judgment of criminal conviction is entered in a state or federal court based upon the same facts as the claim; and
b. The felony judgment of criminal conviction is based upon an act of rape, sodomy, oral copulation or other sexual penetration of a person; For purposes of calculating the amount that the County is obligated to pay into the LTF under this Agreement, any amount paid by an insurance carrier directly to a claimant on a claim which is subject to this Agreement shall not be deemed to have been paid from the LTF.

For purposes of calculating the amount that the County is obligated to pay into the LTF under this Agreement. any amount paid from the LTF on a claim CCCA -COLAS PC) NDENI N7 YAG R. DOC090727FIN. 4

which is subject to this Agreement but which is reimbursed to the LTF by an insurance carrier shall not have been deemed paid from the LTF.

Nothing herein creates an obligation upon the Cities, or any of them, or any other entity to acquire, have or maintain any policy of insurance.

3. Term of and Application to Other Agreements.

This Agreement shall apply to all MLESA agreements now existing or hereafter entered into, including amendments, renewals or other extensions thereof. This Agreement shall serve to supplement the Joint Indemnity Agreements with respect to the single subject matter addressed herein.

Nothing herein shall be deemed to change, modify, alter, amend, or substitute any term, right, obligation or condition set forth in an MLESA, as amended or modified, from time to time.

4. Termination of Service Contracts Between County and Cities.

This Agreement shall continue in effect until the last of any MLESA or similar agreement is lawfully terminated in accordance with its terms. Such termination shall not relieve County or City for any obligations set forth in such MLESA agreement relating to obligations upon termination of such agreement and this Agreement to any claims related to a Sexual Assault.

5. Release of the Claims.

The Cities and each of them hereby waive, release and relinquish any claim they may have for the reimbursement of the sums withdrawn by the County with respect to the Claims. The County hereby waives, releases and relinquishes any right or claim it may have for reimbursement of any sums it has or may have CCCA- COLA .SPCINDGMNTI' 090727FIN. AGR. DOC 5

paid or incurred with regard to any Sexual Assault occurring prior to the effective date of this Agreement.

6. Further Assurances
Each of the parties hereto agrees to execute and deliver any and all additional papers and documents, and to do any and all acts reasonably necessary in connection with the performance of its obligations hereunder and to carry out the intent of the parties hereto.

7. Non - Admission of Liability
Each of the parties hereto agrees that nothing contained or incorporated herein shall be deemed as an admission of liability with respect to any matter, thing, or dispute whatsoever.

8. Entire Agreement
This Agreement with regard to the use of LTF funds by the County for claims arising out of Sexual Assaults, and the other agreements between the parties referenced herein, shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and shall supersede all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations of the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and the terms applicable thereto.

9. Amendment
This Agreement may not be supplemented. modified or amended in any manner, except by an instrument in writing stating that it is a supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement and signed by each of the parties hereto.

CCCA- COLA. SPCINDE:NIN "FYAGR. DOC090727FIN. 6

10. Waiver.

No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or constitute a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any wavier constitute a continuing wavier. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver.

11. Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed by one or more separate counterparts, each of which, when so executed shall together constitute one and the same instrument. A copy transmitted electronically or by facsimile shall be deemed effective as an original.

12. Captions
The captions appearing in this Agreement are descriptive only and for convenience of reference. Should there be any conflict between any such caption and the terms of this Agreement, the latter shall control and govern the construction of this Agreement.

13. Constructions and Interpretation
The parties have participated equally in the preparation of this Agreement, which shall be construed and interpreted simply and fairly and not strictly for or against any party.

14. Recitals.

The Recitals set forth in this Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

CCCA -COLA SKINDEMN' 090727FIN. IYAGR. DOC 7

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their fully authorized officers the day and year hereinafter set forth.

ATTEST:

SACHI HAMAI
Executive Officer -Clerk
Board of Supervisors
By
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ROBERT E. KALUNIAN
Acting County Counsel
Lo
Signatures continued)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

DON KNABE
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
0 CCCA- COLA. SPCINDEMN 8

ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
ATTEST:

City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
m
Signatures Continued)

CITY OF AGOURA HILLS
Lm
MAYOR

CITY OF ARTESIA
By
MAYOR
CCCA- COLA.SPCINDFMNTYAGR 09072 7FM.DOC 9

CITY OF AVALON
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
II
MAYOR

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)
CCGbCOLA. I'AGSPCINDEMN' Y.R. IN090727F' D0C T

CITY OF BRADBURY
0 ITUWCON
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By

CITY OF CALABASAS
10 fuYNTOM
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)
CCCA- COLAS PCINDEMNTYAGR. 090727FIN. DOC

CITY OF CARSON
ATTEST:

M
City Clerk
QI
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
10 ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)

CITY OF CERRITOS
m
fNEVZOT
CCCA- COLA .SKINDE.\ NMNTYAGRD90727F( DOC 12 Page 408 – 567 ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued

CITY OF COMMERCE
m
MAYOR

CITY OF COMPTON
a
MAYOR
CCCA- COLA. SPCINDEYMNIYAGR. 090727HNDOC 13

ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)

CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
By
MAYOR

CITY OF DUARTE
m
MAYOR
COCA -COLAS PCINDEMNTYAC R,090727PINDOC 14 Page 410 – 567

CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
IIm
MAYOR

CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
Signatures Continued)
COCA -COLAS PC. 090727FIN. INDPON1YACR.DOC 1.5

16 CITY OF INDUSTRY
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By

CITY OF LA CANADA
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY -
By
Signatures Continued)
CCCA -COL:\ SPCINDFMNTYAGR. DOC090727FIN. 16 Page 412 – 567 ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
ATTEST:

City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
a
Signatures Continued)

CITY OF LA HABRA HEIGHTS
Im
MAYOR

CITY OF LA MIRADA
m
ruFMO7:7
CCCA- COLA.SPCINDEMNI YAGR. DOC090727FIN. 17

CITY OF LA PUENTE
0 MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By

CITY OF LAKEWOOD
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)
CCCA- COI. SPCINNDEMNPYAG A.R.090727F IN. DOC is

CITY OF LANCASTER
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
0 MAYOR

CITY OF LAWNDALE
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)
COCA- COLA.SPCINDE MNTYAGR.090727 FIN. DOC 19 Page 415 – 567

CITY OF LOMITA
m
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By

CITY OF LYNWOOD
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)
C CCA -CO LA. S P C I N D 8Ni NT Y AG R .09072 7 F I N. DOC 20 Page 416 – 567 I

CITY OF MALIBU
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By

CITY OF NORWALK
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)
CCC.A- COI, SPCINDEMNTYAGR A.O90727FIN.DOC I

CITY OF PALMDALE
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
MAYOR

CITY OF PARAMOUNT
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures Continued)
CCCA - COLAS KINDEb1NTYAGR. DOC090727FIN. 2

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Lo
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By

CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDE
LIZA
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures continued)
CCCA - COLA .SPCWDEMNTYAGR. 090727F IN. DOC 23 Page 419 – 567

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
go
MAYOR

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATE
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures continued)
CCCA- COLA.S PC] N DEMNI' 090YAGR. 72 MN.DOC. 74 Page 420 – 567 ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
ATTEST:

By o
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures continued)

CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Lm
O/ `o

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
MAYOR
CCCA --COLA SPCINDFNIN "rYAGR.090727F1N. DOC 25

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
0 70T. 0
ATTEST:

City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
13Ti
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures continued)
CCCA- COLA. SPCINDFMNTYAG R.090727 FIN, DOC. 26

CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Lm
IMF' • •
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By

CITY OF WALNUT
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
Signatures continued)
CCCA -COLAS PCLNDEMNTYAGR. DOC090727FiN. 2', Page 423 – 567

CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
QQI
MAYOR

CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE
By
MAYOR
ATTEST:

By
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By
End)
CCCA - COL A. S PC[NllEMN'IYAG R.090727FI N. DOC. ZS Page 424 – 567 Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
From: Chris Constantin, City Manager
Subject: Adopt Resolution 2024-42, Expressing the City Council’s Desire to Prioritize the Preservation of Equestrian Uses in Existing Single Family Agricultural Zoning ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
This policy aims to protect property owners' rights to keep horses and maintain the equestrian character of the community. The resolution directs City staff to prioritize equestrian preservation when considering any discretionary changes to land use designations, zoning codes, or regulations. Additionally, it outlines the necessity for a coherent policy to guide future decisions and includes provisions for exceptions in cases of significant projects that offer exceptional value. There is no fiscal impact associated with this resolution.

RECOMMENDATION
The City staff recommends the City Council:
• Approve Resolution 2024-42 approving the City Council’s policy to preserve equestrian uses in existing single family agricultural zoning.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
The San Dimas Municipal Code, Chapter 18.28, governs the Single Family Agricultural (SF-A) zone. This zone aims to balance residential living with agricultural practices, allowing for singlefamily homes and the keeping of certain domestic animals, including horses, under specific conditions.

On April 12, 2022, the City Council denied a request to initiate a general plan amendment and zone change for two parcels on Baseline that would have removed the ability to keep horses and other animals allowed in the SF-A zone. During the discussion, the City Council expressed concerns about allowing changes that reduce the number of parcels available for equestrian use.

Resolution 2024-42 Expressing the City Council’s Desire to Prioritize Equestrian Uses Page 2 For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
Additionally, there were concerns about how development on one property would impact the equestrian capability of another parcel. In light of these concerns, the City Council expressed a desire to continue discussions broadly about protecting the valuable and limited land that allows for equestrian use and other animal keeping uses. As such, the City Council directed City staff to return with a discussion on San Dimas Municipal Code Section 18.28.040 to facilitate this dialogue.

Study Session of May 28, 2024 – Establishing Policy and Future Municipal Code Revisions to Support Maintaining Existing Properties Allowing Equestrian and Other Animal Keeping On May 28, 2024, the City Council held a special study session and identified various issues regarding zoning and the preservation of equestrian properties. The Council discussed a 2021 project initiation that allowed a developer to move forward with rezoning efforts and the subsequent 2022 initiation request, from a different applicant, that was denied due to its potential impact on existing horse-keeping properties. This led to a broader discussion on preserving the equestrian character of the City and the necessity for a clear policy to guide staff in any future rezoning application of such properties. Council members debated the implications of rezoning, minimum lot sizes, and setbacks for horse corrals, highlighting the inconsistency and need for a coherent policy to guide future decisions.

The City Council voted 4-0-1 (Councilmember Nakano abstained) to request a resolution prioritizing the preservation of equestrian use within the SF-A zone and to ensure other parcels retain their equestrian keeping ability. Furthermore, the City Council directed staff to return in October 2024 with a study session to discuss potential changes to the SF-A zone that would positively impact property owners' ability to maintain equestrian and other animal-keeping uses.

The City Council requested the following information:
• A map identifying all SF-A parcels.
• An outline of the cases in which the City tracks the number of parcels maintaining equestrian or other animals; and
• Identification of best practices for horse keeping, including a review of policies in the cities of San Luis Obispo, Lompoc, Cambria, Norco, Fontana, Eastvale, Covina, and Chino.

The proposed resolution aims to set a clear policy direction for the City Council and staff when considering discretionary changes to the code, regulations, zoning, and current properties, emphasizing the preservation of equestrian uses.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The key elements of the proposed resolution are as follows:
• Preservation Priority – The resolution explicitly states the City Council's priority to preserve equestrian uses within existing SF-A zoning areas. This is intended to ensure that property owners can continue to keep horses as per the current Municipal Code. • Protection of Property Rights – The resolution affirms the City Council's commitment to protecting the rights of property owners who currently engage in horse keeping. It emphasizes that future developments or subdivisions should not infringe upon these rights, thereby maintaining the existing equestrian character of the community. • Policy Application – The resolution directs City staff to apply this preservation policy when considering any discretionary changes to land use designations, zoning codes, or

Resolution 2024-42 Expressing the City Council’s Desire to Prioritize Equestrian Uses Page 3 For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
regulations that could impact the ability to keep horses. This ensures that equestrian uses are consistently prioritized in decision-making processes. • Limited Exceptions for Significant Projects – While prioritizing preservation, the resolution also recognizes that certain significant projects may warrant exceptions to the standard zoning regulations. The City Council expresses its desire to allow for such exceptions when City staff determine that a project is of exceptional value and warrants special consideration. These projects must be brought forth to the City Council for review to determine if the application has merit to move forward. • Implementation – The resolution provides a clear framework for implementing this policy, ensuring that any discretionary actions which reduce, limit, or impair horse keeping on a property or neighboring properties are not in keeping with the City Council’s policy desire.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative #1 Modify the Resolution – The City Council can modify the resolution to better fit their policy direction on the topic.

Alternative #2 No Resolution – The City Council can decide not to approve a resolution.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Chris Constantin
City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2024-42 Equestrian Property Preservation

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2024-42

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, EXPRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL'S DESIRE TO PRIORITIZE THE

PRESERVATION OF EQUESTRIAN USES IN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY AGRICULTURAL ZONING
WHEREAS, the City of San Dimas, California (City), recognizes the importance of preserving its equestrian heritage and the existing uses of properties within the Single Family Agricultural (SF-A) zoning; and
WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the desire to maintain the ability for property owners within SF-A zones to keep horses, as outlined in the current Municipal Code, Chapter

18.28; and
WHEREAS, the City Council aims to protect the rights of property owners who currently engage in horse keeping, ensuring their ability is not diminished by new developments or subdivisions that may alter parcel sizes below the thresholds necessary for horse keeping; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that in certain instances, significant projects may warrant amendments to the General Plan or zoning regulations, provided these projects are deemed exceptional and beneficial to the community; and WHEREAS, the City Council will use this policy expression when considering discretionary changes to land use designation, zoning, code, or regulation changes that impact the ability to keep horses to ensure that equestrian uses are prioritized and preserved.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Dimas that:

SECTION 1. The City Council prioritizes the preservation of equestrian uses within existing Single Family Agricultural (SF-A) zoning areas and seeks to maintain the ability of property owners to keep horses as per the current code.

SECTION 2. The City Council affirms its commitment to protecting property owners' rights to horse keeping and will ensure that future developments or subdivisions do not infringe upon these rights. As such, discretionary actions which reduce, limit or impair horse keeping on a property or neighboring properties will not be in keeping with the City Council’s policy desire reflected in Section 1 of this Resolution.

SECTION 3. The City Council expresses its desire to consider limited amendments to the General Plan or zoning regulations when a project is of significant value and warrants special consideration.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest and certify the adoption of this resolution.

Resolution 2024-42 Page 2
Prioritize Equestrian Preservation
June 11, 2024
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June 2024. __________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk
I, Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024-42 was approved by vote of the City Council of the City of San Dimas at its regular meeting of June 11, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
From: Chris Constantin, City Manager
Prepared by: Peter Jacoy, Assistant Engineer
Subject: Approve and Authorize Implementation of an Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Program, Authorize and Appropriate a Total Budget of $36,700.00 in 2023-24 for Purchase of Equipment, Software and Training/Licensure Program, and Authorize City Manager to Approve City UAS Policy
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The City’s existing DJI Phantom 4 Pro Drone has exceeded its operational life span and needs to be replaced. Staff recommends purchasing two (2) DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise Drone and one (1) Matrice 30T Drone and accessories, two (2) Real Flight RC Flight simulators, budget allocation for City’s UAS licensing, training program & UAS management software annual subscription and to Authorize City Manager to Approve City UAS Policy. Grant funds will be used for this initial purchase.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council consider and approve the following:

1. Authorize and Appropriate a total budget of $36,700.00 from the City’s Public Safety Reimbursable Grant for the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program.

2. Approve the purchase of two (2) DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise (and accessories), One (1) DJI Matrice 30T (and accessories), Two (2) Real Flight RC Flight Simulator (and accessories) not to exceed $29,700.00.

3. Approve a budget for UAS training and licensing, not to exceed $4,000.00 per year.

4. Approve the purchase of a subscription to a UAS management software, not to exceed $3,000.00 per year.

5. Authorize City Manager to approve UAS Policy, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Page 2
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024

FISCAL IMPACT
UAS Program requires an appropriation of $36,700.00 from the City’s Public Safety Reimbursable Grant, expense account 001.4210.020.028. As this is reimbursable from the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, we will submit for reimbursement for the amounts expended posting revenue to account 001.358.010. The UAS Program budget is proposed as follows:

ITEMS COST
UAS Equipment + Simulator $29,700.00
UAS Licensing and Training $4,000.00
UAS Management Software $3,000.00
Total Budget $36,700.00
UAS Equipment
City staff requested a quote from B&H using a government discount code provided through National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO), ensuring City receives the best possible prices and procurement terms for the drone equipment purchases. According to B&H, the quoted price is subject to change at the time of order due to vendor restrictions, and the quote is valid until June 29, 2024.

The equipment will be purchased under a piggyback contract, authorized by the City of San Dimas Municipal Code Section 3.28.120, paragraph E. The City will leverage an existing contract (Alaska NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 200000035B) to acquire UAS equipment. This Alaska contract was approved by the State of California. The costs for the UAS Management Software and the RC Flight Simulator are proprietary.

ITEMS COST
(3) SanDisk 1TB Extreme UHS-I micro SDXC (Memory) $328.32 (3) Neck Strap for DJI Smart Controller $0.00
(2) Hoodman Drone Launch Pad $0.00
(2) Mavic 3 Propeller Guard $0.00
(1) Hard-Shell Case for DHI Goggles & Motion Controller $0.00 (4) DJI Goggles Integra Motion Combo with RC Motion 2 $399.00 (4) DJI TB30 Intelligent Flight Battery $1,316.00
(1) DJI Matrice 30T Enterprise Done (Plus Combo) $9,455.95 (2) DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise Drone with RTK Module & Battery Kit $10,652.00 (2) Real Flight RC Flight Simulators $399.98
Shipping $6.99
Estimated Tax $2,142.37
Contingency $4,999.39
Total Equipment Budget $29,700.00
The average life span of a commercial drone is approximately three (3) years, assuming proper maintenance and care. However, this estimate may vary depending on several factors, such as

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Page 3
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
the type and quality of the drone, the battery life, the usage frequency, and environmental conditions. According to DJI Mavic 3 Pro manufacturers specifications, the life span of a drone battery is 200 cycles, which means that a drone can fly about 200 times before needing a new battery.

Future Budget Impacts
Equipment
To maintain a drone program for future years the anticipated cost would include a UAS equipment budget of $29,700.00 be allocated every three years for purchasing new equipment, accessories and spare parts. This will allow City staff to keep up with the latest technology and industry standards, as well as to maintain a reliable and efficient fleet of drones for City operations.

DJI is the leading and largest drone manufacturer globally, supplies 70% of the world’s consumer drones and nearly 80% of those in the United States. Research was performed into drone equipment and practices in other municipalities, such as the City of La Verne, which owns DJI Mavic and DJI Matrice drones, has demonstrated their effectiveness for patrolling, inspections, and media purpose. This confirms that procuring DJI drones will support the City’s operational needs for inspections, photographic and media usage.

UAS Licensing and Training
To enhance City staff’s capabilities in operating UAS, Staff is requesting a budget allocation of $4,000.00 per year from the General Funds for Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Remote Pilot Certification. This certification will allow City employees to fly drones safely and legally. The budget will cover the cost of licensing course/training and licensing exam for eight (8) employees annually, as well as a contingency fund. The breakdown of the cost is as follows:

Licensing course/training: $200.00 per employee
Licensing exam: $200.00 per employee
Contingency: $100.00 +
Total Licensing & Training Budget: $500.00 per Employee Training and licensing costs may be higher initially as each department selects and trains its designated pilots. These expenses will eventually be reduced when the majority of selected employees are fully trained and licensed.

UAS Management Software
Staff is requesting a budget allocation of $3,000.00 per year from the General Fund for a UAS management software that will assist tracking and documenting the life span, usage, maintenance history and provide live stream access from remote locations of City drones.

BACKGROUND
The City has a DJI Phantom 4 Pro drone that was purchased in 2017. The drone has proven to be a valuable asset for tasks such as building/public works inspections, emergency response, and media production.

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Page 4
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
The Phantom 4 Pro has been instrumental in inspecting multiple sites, assisting the City with tract development construction inspections, accessing difficult-to-reach areas, performing slope failure inspections, and conducting various other general City inspections. Additionally, the City has contracted third-party drones for various City events at a cost of $1,500 per session.

However, there has been significant changes to licensing requirement for UAS systems in the last few years. Drone technology has also advanced significantly in the past seven years, and the current DJI Phantom 4 Pro has reached the end of its operational life span and does not meet current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for remote identification.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
To comply with the latest standards and best practices in drone usage for municipal purposes, staff is recommending an upgrade and expand the City’s drone fleet with the following purchases:
• Two (2) DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise drone, which offers improved camera quality, flight performance, and safety features for inspections and media purposes. (Including Accessories)
• One (1) DJI Matrice 30T drone, which is equipped with a thermal camera and a highprecision positioning system for thermal and emergency response inspections. (Including Accessories)
• Two (2) Real Flight RC Flight simulators, which will enhance the training program for the city’s drone remote pilots and operators.
• Approve a budget for UAS training and licensing, not to exceed $4,000.00 per year. • One (1) annual subscription to a drone management software, which will help with the planning, execution, and documentation of drone operations. The subscription cost is not to exceed $3,000.00 per year.

UAS have become a common tool for many municipalities across the country. They offer a range of benefits for various municipal project, such as:
• Real-time tracking of construction projects, emergency situations, environmental conditions, and public events.
• Assist accessing remote locations, such as storm water outlets and steep hills. • Capture high quality videos, images, and measurements that can be used for analysis, planning and reporting.
• Improve efficiency, time and resource to survey large or difficult areas quicker and simpler than traditional methods.
• Accessing unsafe or inaccessible areas without risking employees or damaging property (steep roof).
• Monitoring high risk areas, such as wildland interface and very high fire area for hot spots which may contribute to hazardous conditions.

These purchases will enable the city to continue to benefit from the use of drones in a safe, efficient, and effective manner and will contribute to public safety for multiple departments.

UAS Policy
The purpose of the UAS policy is to establish guidelines for the use of unmanned aircraft systems

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Page 5
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
(UAS) and for the storage, retrieval, and dissemination of images and data captures by the system during City business. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulates and sets guidelines for the safe operation of drones in the United States. Commercial drone operators are required to know specific rules & regulations (Title 14 Code Federal Regulations Part 107), obtain a Remote Pilot Certifications, and obtain, FAA tracking number.

Staff consulted with other Government agencies that have UAS Programs to learn from their policies and procedures. Based on these conversations, City staff developed a UAS Policy Program (Attachment 3) to guide the administration, safety, training, and operations of UAS. The policy also covers the pre and post flight actions required for UAS. The policy provides a foundation for the UAS Program and ensures that public safety and privacy are safe guarded.

This policy has also been reviewed by California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) and City Attorneys Office.

Usage
Building inspectors will be able to use drones for each tract being developed, conducting monthly inspections. Currently, this technology could be utilized for Brasada homes, justifying drone use twelve (12) times a year, excluding future tract projects. Additionally, drones can be used for slope stability inspections around structures, providing different perspectives, and for general inspections, with an expected usage of twenty (20) times per year.

The Facilities Department will use drones to inspect City facilities, typically focusing on roofing and higher altitude structures, resulting in a total usage of fifteen (15) times per year.

Public Works will use drones for before and after pictures of CIP Projects, inspecting slope stability, and conducting channel and runoff inspections at remote locations, potentially using drones twenty (20) times a year.

Parks and Recreation Department will utilize drones for City events:
• Let it Snow Parade
• Holiday Extravaganza
• Halloween Spooktacular
• City Olympics
• Easter Egg Hunt
• City Birthday
• 5K Runnin' Scared
• Bowser Bash
• Cars & Coffee
• Music in the Park
• Heart of the Foothills Event
• Arbor/Earth Day
• Family Campouts
• Advertising with video & pictures from other community events • Youth Sports (Soccer, T-ball, Football)
Currently, the City hires third-party drone services for photographing and videotaping City events at a cost of $1,500 per session. If contracted fifteen (15) times, the cost would be $22,500 annually. Using City-owned drones can significantly reduce these costs. Additionally,

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Page 6
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
Parks and Recreation Maintenance will use drones to inspect terrain on trails and parks of their facilities, resulting in an additional total usage of twelve (12) times per year.

City drones will also serve for emergency response situations, such as search and rescue operations with thermal capability, providing comprehensive situational awareness of growing fires, spot leaks and assisting with other thermal imaging needs. The City will also make drone use available to enhance public safety which can include monitoring areas of encampment cleanup to ensure areas stay clean, identifying illegal dumping the public right of way, monitoring traffic, or participating in other uses where drones would enhance public safety response.

When the city purchased the Phantom 4 Pro, FAA regulations changed within five years, requiring pilot licensing and drones to be equipped with a Remote ID system. Due to the increased drone regulations and rising labor costs, we anticipate the cost of contracted drone services to increase over the next three years.

Cost Savings Analysis
6 Year Period Cost if City adopts Program:

Equipment: $29,700.00 X 2 = $59,400.00
Software: $3,000.00 X 6 = $18,000.00
Training: $4,000.00 X 6 = $24,000.00
$61,000.00 (Equipment) + $18,000.00 (Software) + $24,000.00 (Training) = $101,400.00 6 Year Cost if City contracts Drone Service:

Estimated yearly usage: 75 flights
Cost per contracted drone service = $1,500.00
6 (Years) X $1,500.00 (Cost per Flight) x 75 (Estimated Flights) = $675,000.00 Cost Comparison
Total Cost if City Adopts Program: $101,400.00
Total Cost if City Contracts Services: $675,000.00
Cost savings per 6-year period
$675,000.00 - $101,400.00 = $573,600.00
By adopting City’s own drone program, the City can save up to $573,600.00 over a 6-year period compared to contracting out drone services.

Currently, City staff extends the lifespan of the City's vehicle fleet, and this approach will also apply to drones. The cost of maintaining the drone fleet over three years is likely to be lower. The

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Page 7
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
City plans to extend the lifespan of its drone fleet and may not immediately spend the entire budget allocated for equipment and training. Initially, training and licensing costs may be higher as each department selects and trains their designated pilots until the majority of selected employees are trained.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could provide alternative direction or not authorize the purchase of the UAS Program.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Peter Jacoy
Assistant Engineer
Attachments:

1. Quote from B&H Photo Video for drone and accessories purchase.

2. Quote from Real Flight for the two (2) RC Flight Simulators.

3. City of San Dimas Draft UAS Policy.

Federal ID#: 13-2768071
Prices Are Valid Until: 06/29/24 Quote No.: 906104879
Reference No.: NASPO
Sold To: Jonathan Marin
City Of San Dimas
245 E Bonita Ave
SAN DIMAS, CA 91773
Bill Phone: (909)394-6254
Date
05/30/24
Customer Code
B6702019
Terms
N/A
Salesperson
D8Q
Ship Via

MULTIPLE
Line
No
Qty
Ord Item Description
SKU#
MFR# Item Price Amount
1 2
2 2
DJI MAVIC 3E WORRY-FREE PLUS COMBO/REG
DJI MAVIC 3 ENTERPRISE - SP PLUS/REG
DJMVC3EPSPPK
DJMVC3EPSPP
()
(CP.EN.00000410.SP)
5,326.00 10,652.00
CONSISTS OF:

Special Order. 7-14 Business Days
This Is A Special Order Item, And Is Not Returnable.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

This Is A Special Order Item, And Is Not Returnable.

This price may change at the time of order per
vendor restriction
Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
Continued on Next Page ...

BNH_quote#X Customer Copy Page 1 of 6
ATTACHMENT 1

Federal ID#: 13-2768071
Quote No.: 906104879
Date
05/30/24
Customer Code
B6702019
Terms
N/A
Salesperson
Slsm
Ship Via

MULTIPLE
Line
No
Qty
Ord Item Description
SKU#
MFR# Item Price Amount
3 4
5 2
2 1
DJI MAVIC 3 ENTRPRS PART 01-RTK MODULE/REG
DJI MAVIC 3 ENTRPRS PART 05-BATTERY KIT/REG
DJI MATRICE 30T DRONE (NA) SP PLUS/REG
DJMV3EPP1RTK
DJMV3EPP5BK
DJM30TDNASPP
(CP.EN.00000417.01)
(CP.EN.00000421.01)
(CB.202203170238)
9,455.95 9,455.95
In Stock - while supplies last.

In Stock - while supplies last.

This price may change at the time of order per
vendor restriction
Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

This price may change at the time of order per
vendor restriction
Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

This Is A Special Order Item, And Is Not Returnable.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Continued on Next Page ...

BNH_quote#X Customer Copy Page 2 of 6

Federal ID#: 13-2768071
Quote No.: 906104879
Date
05/30/24
Customer Code
B6702019
Terms
N/A
Salesperson
Slsm
Ship Via

MULTIPLE
Line
No
Qty
Ord Item Description
SKU#
MFR# Item Price Amount
6 7
8 1
1 4
DJI MATRCE 30T ENT DRONE-48MP/16xOZ/200xDZ/REG
DJI CARE REFRESH PLUS f/ MATRICE 30T DRONE/REG
DJI MATRICE 30 SRS INTELLIGENT FLIGHT BATT/REG
DJMAT30TED
DJCRPLSM30T
DJM30IFBT
(CP.EN.00000383.01)
(CP.QT.00005762.01)
(CP.EN.00000369.02)
329.00 1,316.00
CONSISTS OF:

Special Order. 2-4 Weeks
Special Order. 2-4 Weeks
Temporarily Out of Stock. More on the Way
This Is A Special Order Item, And Is Not Returnable.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

This Is A Special Order Item, And Is Not Returnable.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

This price may change at the time of order per
vendor restriction
Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Continued on Next Page ...

BNH_quote#X Customer Copy Page 3 of 6

Federal ID#: 13-2768071
Quote No.: 906104879
Date
05/30/24
Customer Code
B6702019
Terms
N/A
Salesperson
Slsm
Ship Via

MULTIPLE
Line
No
Qty
Ord Item Description
SKU#
MFR# Item Price Amount
9 10
11 3
2 1
SANDISK 1TB EXTREME UHS-I mSD MEMORY CARD/REG
HOODMAN 3' DRONE LAUNCH PAD/REG

DJI GOGGLES INTEGRA MOTION COMBO/REG
SA1TBBEMSD
HOHDLP3
DJGIMC
(SDSQXAV-1T00-AN6MA)
(HDLP3)
(CP.FP.00000119.01)
109.44
.00
399.00
328.32
.00
399.00
Instant Savings 140.00 $140.00 Instant Savings Exp. 06/30/24 This item currently has a price of $109.99 while supplies last.

In Stock - while supplies last.

In Stock - while supplies last.

Instant Savings 180.00 $180.00 Instant Savings Exp. 06/30/24 This item currently has a price of $469.00 while supplies last.

In Stock - while supplies last.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Continued on Next Page ...

BNH_quote#X Customer Copy Page 4 of 6

Federal ID#: 13-2768071
Quote No.: 906104879
Date
05/30/24
Customer Code
B6702019
Terms
N/A
Salesperson
Slsm
Ship Via

MULTIPLE
Line
No
Qty
Ord Item Description
SKU#
MFR# Item Price Amount
12 13
14 1
2 3
GO HARD CASE f/DJI GOGGLES & MOTION CNTRL/REG
DJI MAVIC 3 PROPELLER GUARD/REG
DIGITALFOTO RBR SHLDER/NCK STRP f/DJI SMRT CNTRLR/REG

GOGPCDJIIGMC
DJMAVIC3PG
DISCDMS01
(GPC-DJI-IGMC)
(CP.MA.00000670.01)
(SC-DMS01)
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
In Stock - while supplies last.

In Stock - while supplies last.

In Stock - while supplies last.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Please be aware that this is an 'All-or-None' Bid.

Bid Pricing will only be valid if all of the items
are purchased at one time. Any returns will be
factored into the total bid pricing.

Continued on Next Page ...

BNH_quote#X Customer Copy Page 5 of 6

Federal ID#: 13-2768071
Quote No.: 906104879
Date
05/30/24
Customer Code
B6702019
Terms
N/A
Salesperson
Slsm
Ship Via

MULTIPLE
Line
No
Qty
Ord Item Description
SKU#
MFR# Item Price Amount
PLEASE NOTE: ------------------------------------------------------------------ **** Please reference your quote number on all PO's **** **** ALL PRICES ARE LISTED IN USD ****
Payment Type -

NO PAYMENT TYPE SELECTED

- Amount

Sub-Total:

Shipping:

Tax:

Total:
22,151.27
Free STND
2,104.37
24,255.64
BNH_quote#X Customer Copy Page 6 of 6

9/25/2023 Checkout with your RealFlight Shopping Cart | RealFlight https://www.realflight.com/checkout?stage=payment#payment 1/2 Back to Cart
Checkout
1 Edit . Shipping
Shipping Address
Peter Jacoy
245 E Bonita Ave
San Dimas CA 91773-3002
9093946245
Shipping Method
$6.99
Enter Your Billing Address

2. Payment
Do you have a redemption/coupon code? ⓘ
Apply
Payment Method
■☑ Billing Address is the same as Shipping Address
Peter Jacoy 245 E Bonita Ave San Dimas CA 91773-3002
Email Address
[email protected]
Phone Number
9093946245
Horizon Hobby RC Club Rewards
Member Status
MEMBER
Points Balance
Credit Card
Card Number
Exp. Month
Select
Exp. Year
Select
Security Code
FedEx Home Delivery ( 3-5 Days )
Privacy - Terms
Continue To Order Review
ATTACHMENT 1

9/25/2023 Checkout with your RealFlight Shopping Cart | RealFlight https://www.realflight.com/checkout?stage=payment#payment 2/2 Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $111.25 with . Learn more Security Code
■☑ Save Card to Account
/ Pay Later

3.Order Review
Order Summary
RealFlight - RFL2000
RealFlight Evolution RC Flight Simulator with InterLink DX Controller $399.98
2 ITEM(S) - $399.98
Qty: 2
Order Total
© RealFlight 2023 | Distributed by Horizon Hobby & Tower Hobbies Subtotal $399.98
Shipping $6.99
Estimated Sales Tax $38.00
$444.97
Privacy - Terms
Continue To Order Review Page 444 – 567
01171.0001/976725.1 1

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
Administrative Policy and Procedure Manual

1.0 BACKGROUND
The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS or drones) and for the storage, retrieval, and dissemination of images and data captures by the system during City operations. This policy will establish the scope and governance of UAS use. A UAS is an unmanned aircraft of any type that is capable of sustaining directed flight, whether programmed or remotely controlled, and all of the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording, or any other means. The purpose is to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and industry best practices, as well as to prioritize safety, security, and respect for privacy.

2.0 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include:

City of San Dimas Flight Record – An auditable, easily accessible resource containing operations, logs, training/certification, and flight information.

Day – The time from the beginning of morning civil twilight to the end of evening civil twilight.

Direct Operations – Remote pilot in command directly maneuvers the sUAS using inputs from the ground control station user-interface.

Drone – The common term for UAS, and sUAS.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – A division of the Department of Transportation that inspects and rates civilian aircraft and pilots, enforces the rules of air safety, and installs and maintains air-navigation and traffic-control facilities.

Part 107 – Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

Remote Pilot Certification – The certification required to fly under the FAA’s sUAS Rule (Part 107), demonstrating the understanding of regulations, operating requirements, and procedures for Subject: Unmanned Aerial System (Drone)
Policy for City Staff Number:

Department(s)
Affected
All Departments Participating in
Drone Use for Various City
Operations
Effective
Date:

Upon
Approval
Program
Coordinator:

Director of Public Works
Department
File
References:

Authority:

City Manager Approved: TBD
ATTACHMENT 3

01171.0001/976725.1 2
safely flying UAS. Obtain a FAA Tracking Number by creating an Integrated Airman Certification and Rating Application profile prior to registering for the knowledge test. Pass the initial aeronautical knowledge test: “Unmanned Aircraft General – Small (UAG).” Complete FAA Form 8710-13.

Remote Pilot-in-Command (RPIC) – The official term given by the FAA for the individual who either (1) directly operates the UAS or (2) directly supervises another individual operating the UAS.

Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) – The combination of one or more small unmanned aircraft (sUAS), a command-and-control system, and the human operators tasked with supervision and control of the aircraft. The sUAS weighs less than 55 pounds on takeoff, including everything that is attached to the aircraft.

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) – An unmanned aircraft of any type that is capable of sustaining directed flight, whether preprogrammed or remotely controlled (commonly referred to as an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAS) or drone), and all of the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording or any other means.

Unmanned Aircraft General – Small (UAG) Initial Aeronautical Exam – Exam required by the FAA as a prerequisite to Remote Pilot Certification. Knowledge test topic areas include: Applicable regulations relating to small unmanned aircraft system rating privileges, limitations, and flight operation; Airspace classification and operating requirements, and flight restrictions affecting small unmanned aircraft operation; Aviation weather sources and effects of weather on small unmanned aircraft performance; Small unmanned aircraft loading and performance; Emergency procedures; Crew resource management; Radio communication procedures; Determining the performance of small unmanned aircraft; Physiological effects of drugs and alcohol; Aeronautical decision-making and judgment; Airport operations; Maintenance and preflight inspection procedures; and, Operations at night.

UAS Program Coordinator – The City personnel responsible for administering and overseeing other participating Departments’ adherence to all Part 107 requirements.

Visual Observer – Visual Observer means a person who is designated by the RPIC to assist the remote pilot in command and the person manipulating the flight controls of the sUAS to see and avoid other air traffic or objects aloft or on the ground.

3.0 AUTHORITY
The City as referenced throughout this policy refers to the City of San Dimas, California. The City has appointed the following person to the listed role:

Contacts
UAS Program Coordinator: Assistant City Manager
Phone Number: [Phone Number]
Email: [Email]
The UAS will be operated according to and within the current guidelines of the FAA and the City’s elected operating procedure under Part 107.

01171.0001/976725.1 3

4.0 SCOPE OF POLICY
This policy applies to the use of UAS by City employees in the performance of their official duties.

Only duly trained and authorized City personnel may deploy and operate a City-owned UAS. This policy is applicable to all UAS platforms including but not limited to: sUAS, Drones, and Model Aircrafts, regardless of size or weight. All City uses of any UAS will be in accordance with this policy, constitutional and other legal requirements, privacy rights, safety concerns, and FAA regulations.

Any third party that is contracted by the City to use a UAS shall provide their own drone but must adhere with this policy, constitutional and other legal requirements, privacy rights, safety concerns, and FAA regulations.

5.0 POLICY
UAS may be utilized to enhance the City’s mission of serving the public when other means and resources are not available or are less effective. The City’s use of UAS operations include, but are not limited to, capturing imagery for ongoing construction projects, cataloguing and taking inventory of damage to or conditions of City owned infrastructure, providing information to the public, capturing video and imagery of City held events, and aiding in accessing difficult or remote areas.

Training & Certification – Part 107 Remote Pilot Certification The UAS Program Coordinator and all certified RPICs must obtain the necessary licenses, permits, and certifications as required by law and maintain their compliance to be eligible for UAS operations.

RPICs shall each, individually, obtain a Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate through the FAA before performing any flight operations, abide by all FAA regulations, and adhere to this policy during all City drone operations. The certificate will demonstrate that the RPIC understands the regulations, operating requirements, and procedures for safely flying drones. To ensure compliance with Part 107, all requirements set forth by the FAA must be strictly adhered to.

To be in compliance with the Part 107 certificate, RPICs shall be limited to flying a drone under 55 pounds at or below 400 feet above ground level for visual line-of-sight operations only, and follow all applicable rules governed by the FAA.

General Regulations

1. The UAS shall be operated with strict oversight within established policies and procedures.

2. In addition to observing the regulations set forth in this policy, all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, and regulations shall be observed during all UAS operations.

6.0 OPERATING REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
Flight Operations – All City sUAS operations must comply with current FAA regulations and are subject to all Part 107 requirements.

Operations Over Human Beings – Pursuant to Section 107.39 of Part 107, all City sUAS operations should avoid engaging in flight operations over human beings who are not participants in the flight operation. If flight operations require flying over non-participating human beings, the

01171.0001/976725.1 4
sUAS must not contain any exposed rotating parts capable of lacerating human skin and notice must be provided that there is a sUAS operating above them. Notice may include posted signage indicating that live sUAS operations are ongoing and entry to the particular place of operation in and of itself is consent to the operation.

Required Waivers – If the sUAS flight operations require operating the sUAS contrary any rule or specific requirement set forth in Part 107, a waiver is required. Express written authorization of the City’s City Manager must be obtained prior to operating an sUAS under any of the foregoing conditions and obtaining the required waiver. As set forth by the FAA, RPICs will obtain waivers before engaging in any of the following operations:

Waivers shall be required for operations including: Applicable Part 107 regulation requiring a waiver
from:

Flying a sUAS from a moving aircraft or a vehicle in populated areas
§ 107.25 – Operation from a
Moving Vehicle or Aircraft
Flying a sUAS at night without anti-collision lighting § 107.29(a)(2) – Operation at night
Flying a sUAS during periods of civil twilight without anti-collision lighting
§ 107.29(b) – Operation at
Night
Flying a sUAS beyond your ability to clearly determine the position, altitude, attitude, and movement of the sUAS, with unaided vision § 107.31 – Visual Line of Sight
Aircraft Operation
Using a Visual Observer (VO) without following all VO requirements § 107.33 – Visual Observer Flying multiple sUAS with only one remote pilot § 107.35 – Operation of Multiple Small UAS
Flying over people with a sUAS, which does not meet conditions of operational categories 1, 2, 3, or 4 as specified in CFR § 107.39 § 107.39 – Operation over
human beings.

Flying a sUAS:
• Over 100 miles per hour groundspeed
• Over 400 feet above ground level (AGL)
• With less than 3 statute miles of visibility
• Within 500 feet vertically or 2000 feet horizontally from clouds
§ 107.51 – Operating
limitations for Small Unmanned
Aircraft
Flying over moving vehicles with a sUAS, which does not meet conditions of operational categories 1, 2, 3, or 4 as specified in CFR §107.145
§ 107.145 – Operations Over
Moving Vehicles
Specific Duties and Responsibilities
The UAS Program Coordinator shall:

01171.0001/976725.1 5

1. Be responsible for updating and amending this policy to ensure that the current specifications are up to date, including but not limited to: drone specification, training procedures, safety and privacy concerns, and operating procedures;

2. Approve and authorize flight operations in accordance to the Site Visit Criteria;

3. Verify certification, training and program compliance;

4. Provide technical assistance and logistical support to all trained staff operating a UAS, including but not limited to RPICs and VOs;

5. Adhere to the permissible uses of UASs;

6. Adhere to all requirements set by Part 107; and,

7. Adhere to the policy for retention of UAS data.

All RPICs and Personnel Operating a UAS shall:

1. Maintain valid licenses, certification, and complete all required training. The FAA remote pilot certificate must be renewed every two years and must always be carried by the RPIC during all UAS operations;

2. Be responsible for receiving and maintaining all required reporting records for Part 107;

3. Determine whether a waiver is required, and if so, apply for and obtain a waiver after obtaining written City Manager approval;

4. Approve and authorize flight operations in accordance to the Site Visit Criteria;

5. Hold a pre-flight briefing with the VO and any attending staff to obtain general knowledge of the site including take-off and landing zones, privacy concerns, and areas of focus;

6. Adhere to the permissible uses of UASs;

7. Adhere to the policy for retention of UAS data;

8. Approve and authorize flight operations in accordance to the Site Visit Criteria;

9. Be responsible for completing the Site Visit Criteria if applicable;

10. Perform pre and post flight inspections;

11. Be responsible for overseeing the cleanliness, maintenance, repairs, and security of equipment including the UAS assigned to their department;

12. If a UAS has not been assigned to them, contact the UAS Program Coordinator to secure a UAS [# of business days] business days prior to a site visit. Then, the RPIC shall:
a. Upon checking out the UAS from the UAS Program Coordinator, assume responsibility for the storage, transportation, assembly and the overall care, maintenance, and condition of the UAS;
b. Re-charge the UAS batteries prior to returning the UAS; c. Coordinate the return of the UAS with the UAS Program Coordinator by the end of the next business day following the completion of the flight(s); and d. Remove all images and video from the site visit(s) prior to returning the SD memory card(s). Return the SD memory card(s) to the UAS Program Coordinator with the UAS.

13. Provide the FAA with any required notifications/authorizations using the appropriate applications;

14. Function as the flight leader and operator of the UAS during site visits with the authority to designate and/or change crew roles as needed;

15. Ensure that equipment is prepared for flight and paired accordingly;

16. Ensure that the UAS is operating within its limitations per 14 CFR § 107.51;

17. Ensure that the UAS has programed a pre-determined location/safe location for the UAS to Return to Home (RTH) in the event of an emergency;

01171.0001/976725.1 6

18. Ensure all UAS operations are compliant with this policy and applicable appendices;

19. Ensure the safe operation, input of commands, and piloting of the UAS in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations;

20. Report all incidents, including equipment malfunctions, to the UAS Program Coordinator within 24 hours. For incidents involving injuries to a person or damages to personal property, fill out an incident report as approved by the City;

21. Maintain a UAS Program Flight Activity listing the RPIC, VO, any other personnel in attendance of the flight, and the date, time, duration, and location of the flight; and,

22. Log the flight operation and sort through/identify the usable imagery and video within [# of business days] business days. Store all imagery and data in accordance with City procedures.

All VOs shall:

1. Maintain constant communication with the RPIC throughout the operation to ensure instant relaying of information; and,

2. Maintain visual observation of the UAS during flight operations and alert the RPIC of any hazardous conditions (e.g., obstructions, terrain, powerlines, structures, air traffic, weather, etc.), which may affect the safety of the operation.

3. Demonstrate a basic understanding of UAS operations and of applicable City policies and procedures.

Pilot Certification – All RPICs must obtain proper Part 107 certification from the FAA. Obtaining certification shall be adequate to demonstrate that the UAS all RPICs understand the regulations, operating requirements, and procedures for safe flight operations.

To obtain a certification, personnel must comply with guidelines including but not limited to:
• Be at least 16 years old;
• Be able to read, speak, write and understand English; • Be in a physical and mental condition to safely fly a drone; and, • Pass the initial aeronautical knowledge exam: “Unmanned Aircraft General – Small (UAG)”.

The UAS RPICs must be recertified every two years. The certificate license must also be available for inspection during all UAS operations.

A UAS shall only be operated by the RPICs who have received a Part 107 Certificate and has appropriate training and understanding of UAS operating requirements, emergency protocols, and general training in the controlling legal principles dealing with privacy and safety concerns.

Registration
Each UAS operating and conducting flights under Part 107 must be identifiable to the City. Once registered, the registration number must be placed onto a visible area of the UAS. The registration number may be engraved, attached via a permanent label, or inscribed by permanent marker.

All UAS must be registered through FAADroneZone. (Pursuant to FAA requirements, failure to register a UAS requiring registration may result in regulatory and criminal penalties.) Once the UAS is properly registered, the FAA will issue a registration certificate (either a paper copy or digital copy) to be kept in the possession of the RPIC at all times during UAS operations. Once

01171.0001/976725.1 7
registered, the registration number must be placed onto a visible area of the UAS. The registration number may be engraved, attached via a permanent label, or inscribed by permanent marker.

Accident Reporting
All accidents must be reported promptly (in no event later than within 24 hours) to the UAS Program Coordinator or the City Manager for appropriate action. Any operation that results in serious injury, loss of consciousness, or property damage (other than to the UAS) of at least $500 must be reported to the FAA within 10 days of City’s receipt of notice.

7.0 MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION
Equipment Maintenance and Inspection

1. The UAS Program Coordinator shall ensure regular maintenance is conducted on the UAS according to manufacturer guidelines.

2. Any damage or malfunctions shall be promptly reported to the UAS Program Coordinator.

Pre-Flight/ Post-Flight Operations
City employees may submit flight operation requests to the UAS Program Coordinator or RPIC at [insert contact information]. The application should detail the date, time, and location of the proposed flight operation and the reason such flight operation is being requested. Additionally, the application should include the name of the proposed RPIC and VO.

The UAS Program Coordinator and/or RPIC reserves the right to cancel or reschedule any approved UAS operation.

In addition to the Pre-Flight/Post-Flight Operations set forth in the City’s drone policy, the UAS Program Coordinator or RPIC must use the following Site Visit Criteria in addition to any other department specific criteria to determine if the operation should be approved. A “yes” response to any question suggests that the use of UAS operation may be appropriate.

Question Considerations Yes No

1. Are there safety hazards
present at the site?
Safety hazards staff face include, but are not
limited to, hazards related to topography,
encountering unknown individuals, exposure
to radiation, piles of junk and salvage
material, etc. The use of a UAS can
eliminate expose to these hazards.

2. If yes to 1, are these safety
hazards preventing access to the
whole or portions of the site?
In several instances the above-mentioned
safety hazards can limit access to sites. By
eliminating exposures to these hazards, the
UAS can aid staff in accessing sites and
conducting full site visits.

3. Is there a physical barrier(s)
preventing access to the whole or
a portion of the site?
Physical barriers staff face which restrict
access to sites include but are not limited to,
outside storage, junk, cargo containers etc.

A UAS can help overcome these physical
barriers.

01171.0001/976725.1 8

4. Would it take an above average
amount of time to survey the site
by foot?
Very large sites can be very time-consuming
to survey on foot. A UAS can be used to
survey large sites quicker; thereby,
increasing efficiency.

5. Has staff conducted a site visit
multiple times; yet been unable to
conduct a complete site visit?
To improve efficiency, a UAS can be used to
ensure complete site visits are conducted in
a single trip.

6. Is the person in control of the
property likely to give consent to
the use of a UAS?
Securing consent reduces legal risk. If
possible, site visits with consent should be
prioritized.

7. Is the case a high concern for
the City?
A UAS can be used to document high-profile
cases with more detail.

Note: A UAS should never be used over private property if consent or a warrant has not been obtained. Furthermore, a UAS should never be used to fly within an enclosed structure, as they are designed only for outdoor use. In addition, unless a waiver from the FAA has been obtained, a UAS should not fly over crowds.

8.0 RESTRICTIONS
Use of UAS
Only authorized operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate the UAS. Use of vision enhancement technology (e.g., thermal and other imaging equipment not generally available to the public) is permissible in viewing areas only where there is no protectable privacy interest or when in compliance with a search warrant or court order. In all other instances, legal counsel should be consulted. UAS operations should only be conducted consistent with FAA regulations.

Permissible UAS Uses:
• Disaster management and planning
• Search and rescue operations in emergencies
• Geographic mapping of inaccessible terrain
• Inspections
• Aiding abatement
• Building assessments
• Construction evaluations
• Coordinating with Fire Department
• Coordinating with Law Enforcement
• Aerial imagery
• Surveying
• Overseeing construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work • Maintenance of City’s infrastructure
• Maintenance of public property
• Crowd monitoring at public events
• Showcasing of City events and City projects
• Other uses consistent with this policy

01171.0001/976725.1 9
Prohibited UAS Uses:

UAS operation is prohibited if any person(s) acting as a RPIC:
• Has consumed alcohol in the past 12 hours;
• Has used any drugs that would affect the RPIC’s faculties in any way; or, • Has not completed proper trainings or obtained proper certifications.

During all UAS operations, RPICs, and VOs shall not use UAS to conduct any of the following activities:
• Random surveillance activities;
• Targeting an individual based solely individual characteristics, such as but not limited to, race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation; • Harassing, intimidating, or discriminating against any individual or group; • Injuring or attempting to injure an individual; or,
• Conducting personal business of any type.

Unauthorized Operations: Employees shall not operate UAS on behalf of City without proper authorization, outside the scope of their assigned duties or conduct personal business of any type.

Unauthorized Recording or Surveillance: UAS operations must not be used for unauthorized recording, surveillance, or any activity that infringes on personal privacy or violates applicable laws.

Reckless or Careless Behavior: Engaging in reckless or careless behavior that may endanger people, property, or the City's reputation is strictly prohibited.

Unauthorized Modifications: UAS equipment must not be modified, altered, or tampered with without proper authorization from the City's designated Program Coordinator. All additions and modifications shall meet UAS manufacturer guidelines and abide by 14 CFR Part 107.

All UAS operations are to comply with FAA rules and regulations.

9.0 PRIVACY CONSIDERATIONS FOR DRONE OPERATIONS
The UAS Program Coordinator, RPICs, and VOs are to protect private individuals’ constitutional rights and reasonable expectations of privacy when conducting surveillance or collecting evidence for code enforcement use, including but not limited to, inspections and abatements. The UAS Program Coordinator, RPICs, and VOs shall not intentionally record or transmit images of any location where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, which includes all private property other than open fields and areas open to the public at large, except as authorized by applicable law or pursuant to permission of the property owner and/or warrant. UAS operators and observers will be held accountable for ensuring that UAS operations intrude to the minimal extent possible.

The UAS Program Coordinator, RPICs, and VOs will make observations via UASs in the least intrusive manner possible, from public navigable airspace, using widely available drone technology, and avoiding intrusion on intimate activities unless consent or a warrant is obtained, or a legitimate emergency exists.

01171.0001/976725.1 10
The UAS Program Coordinator, and all RPICs and VOs are to comply with all FAA requirements to ensure that surveillance and evidence collection is obtained at the authorized altitude, in the least intrusive manner possible, and without the use of non-publicly available and generally used technology, for example, thermal imagining, extreme zoom and similar, unless consent or a warrant is obtained, or a legitimate emergency exists.

The UAS Program Coordinator, RPICs, and VOs shall take reasonable precautions to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Reasonable precautions include deactivating or turning imaging devices away from such areas or persons during UAS operations.

10.0 DATA AND FLIGHT ACTIVITY REPORTING
The City and the UAS Program Coordinator, and all RPICs and VOs will follow FAA rules and any State laws applicable to data retention and reporting. Photographs and videos collected by the UAS shall be retained in accordance with state law and the City’s retention policies.

Agency reporting of UAS Program Flight Activity will depend on whether the operation of the UAS is subject to Part 107. Part 107 does not require monthly reports unless a separate waiver requires reporting.

11.0 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
Loss of Communications:

In the event that the RPIC or VO experiences a loss of communication and communication is not promptly reestablished, the operation must be immediately terminated.

Loss of GPS by aircraft:

In the event that there is a lost link with the UAS, the UAS should automatically fly to the predetermined RTH. However, the RPIC should not rely on the RTH procedure if a loss link occurs.

RPIC shall communicate to the VO that a loss link has occurred and note the last location of the drone to begin coordinating how to track the UAS and begin moving towards it to recuperate it.

12.0 ENFORCEMENT AND CONSEQUENCES
Any City staff who operates a UAS in an unsafe manner or in violation of this policy and/or Federal, State, or local regulations may be subject to legal and/or disciplinary action and may be prohibited from conducting any additional UAS flights. The severity of disciplinary action taken by the City will depend on the nature and frequency of the violation.

13.0 POLICY REVIEW
This policy will be reviewed periodically to ensure relevance and effectiveness. Amendments may be made as necessary to align with changing laws, regulations, and industry best practices.

14.0 REFERENCES
https://www.faa.gov/uas/public_safety_gov

01171.0001/976725.1 11
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-107 https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/RIC/Publications/cops-w0894-pub.pdf https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/emergency_situations https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/7930.2T_Bsc_dtd_12_14_23_FINAL.pdf https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-107/subpart-B/section-107.51 https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/part_107_waivers https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/register_drone

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
From: Chris Constantin, City Manager
Subject: Discussion, Consideration, and Possible Approval of Resolution 2024-40 Opposition to Golden State Water Company's Proposed Rate Increases ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Golden State Water Company (GSWC) has filed a General Rate Case (GRC) application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requesting substantial rate increases over the next three years. The proposed increases would significantly impact San Dimas residents.

The Public Advocates Office has raised several concerns regarding the magnitude and justification of these increases. This staff report recommends that the City Council approve a resolution opposing the proposed rate increases or take no action on GSWC's application.

RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommend the City Council:
• Approve Resolution 2024-40 opposing the proposed rate increases by Golden State Water Company; or
• Take no position

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
Golden State Water Company (GSWC) has filed a General Rate Case (GRC) application (A.23- 08-010) with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). GSWC is seeking authorization to increase water rates over a three-year period for multiple service areas:
• 2025: Increase of $87,060,700 (22.95%)
• 2026: Increase of $20,699,200 (4.42%)
• 2027: Increase of $22,408,200 (4.57%)
These increases will result in a cumulative rate hike of over 34%. The City of San Dimas, which is part of Region 3 under GSWC's service areas, would experience significant financial impacts

Discussion, Consideration, and Possible Approval of Resolution 2024-40 Opposition to Golden State Water Company's Proposed Rate Increases and Request for Evidentiary Hearing Page 2 For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
if these increases are approved. The Public Advocates Office at CPUC filed a formal protest against GSWC's application, highlighting several issues with the proposed rate hikes.

At this point, the significant increases will be a burden on our residents. Golden State Water did not provide the City an advanced review of the elements supporting their rate case. Upon invitation, Golden State Water Company will be presenting information regarding their rate case during the City Council meeting.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Proposed Rate Increases
GSWC has proposed significant rate increases for its water services over the next three years.

For an average resident in San Dimas, which is part of Region 3, this means that by 2027, water bills could be over 34% higher than they are today. Here are the specific proposed increases for the Region 3 proposed in the rate case:
• 2025: Increase of $38,914,600 (25.33%)
• 2026: Increase of $7,867,900 (4.07%)
• 2027: Increase of $8,560,500 (4.25%)
According to GSWC’s rate case, If the proposed application is approved by the CPUC, the average residential customer with a 5/8 x 3/4” meter using 11 CCF (1 CCF = 748 gallons) would see a monthly bill increase of $17.30 (or 24.90%), from $69.49 to $86.79 in 2025. In 2026 the average residential customer would see a monthly bill increase of $3.57 (or 4.11%), from $86.79 to $90.36, and a monthly bill increase of $3.87 (or 4.28%), from $90.36 to $94.23 in 2027, excluding any applicable surcharges. This represents a significant increase, particularly for families on fixed incomes.

The primary reasons GSWC cites for these increases include:
• Infrastructure Investments: GSWC plans to invest heavily in upgrading water infrastructure, such as pipes, treatment plants, and distribution systems. • Employee Benefits: The costs for employee benefits, including pensions and performance bonuses, are expected to rise significantly. • Purchased Water and Power: The cost of purchasing water and the power needed to pump and treat it is expected to increase.
• Maintenance and Operational Costs: Other operational expenses, such as chemicals for water treatment and routine maintenance, are also expected to go up.

Public Advocates Office Protest
The Public Advocates Office at CPUC has raised several concerns about the proposed rate increases during there protest. The Public Advocates Office is an independent division within the CPUC that advocates on behalf of utility consumers to ensure they receive the lowest possible rates for reliable and safe services. Their role includes scrutinizing utility rate increase applications to ensure they are justified and in the public interest.

The concerns raised by the Public Advocates Office include:
• Magnitude of Increases: The proposed rate hikes are very large and may be more than what appears necessary. They argue that such significant increases could place an unnecessary financial burden on customers, particularly those with limited incomes.

Discussion, Consideration, and Possible Approval of Resolution 2024-40 Opposition to Golden State Water Company's Proposed Rate Increases and Request for Evidentiary Hearing Page 3 For the Meeting of June 11, 2024
• Incentives for Overspending: Under the current rate-of-return regulation, utilities like GSWC are allowed to earn a return on their investments. This can create an incentive for the company to spend more on capital projects because higher spending can lead to higher profits. The Public Advocates Office is concerned that GSWC might be overspending on capital projects, which would unnecessarily inflate customer rates. • Past Investments: The protest also points out that GSWC is asking for money to complete projects that were previously approved. The Public Advocates Office questions whether ratepayers have seen any benefits from these past expenditures and whether the new spending is justified.
• Operational and Maintenance Costs: The justification for increased operational and maintenance costs is also scrutinized. For example, they question the necessity and efficiency of the proposed increases in employee benefits and maintenance expenses.

ALTERNATIVES
Not applicable. The two options provided in the recommendation are the primary alternatives.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Chris Constantin
City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2024-40 Opposing Golden State Water's Rate Increase

2. Public Advocates Office Protest

3. Golden State Water's General Rate Case

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2024-40

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES, OPPOSING THE RATE INCREASE PROPOSED BY THE GOLDEN STATE

WATER COMPANY
WHEREAS, the Golden State Water Company (GSWC) has filed a General Rate Case (GRC) application (A.23-08-010) with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requesting authorization to increase water rates by $87,060,700 (22.95%) in 2025, $20,699,200 (4.42%) in 2026, and $22,408,200 (4.57%) in 2027, resulting in a total rate increase of over 34% over three years; and
WHEREAS, GSWC's proposed rate increases would significantly impact the residents of San Dimas and Region 3 by increasing the average monthly residential bill, contributing to financial strain on residents, especially those on fixed incomes; and WHEREAS, the proposed rate increases are driven by GSWC's capital budget requests, employee benefits, operational and maintenance costs, and purchased water and power expenses, with significant increases in Region 3 including a $9,099,400 increase in return on rate base and a $6,285,800 increase in purchased water expenses; and WHEREAS, the City of San Dimas acknowledges the need for improvements to the water supply system but believes that the proposed rate increases are excessive and place an undue financial burden on residents, businesses, and other customers within the city; and WHEREAS, the Public Advocates Office at CPUC has filed a formal protest against GSWC's application, raising concerns about the magnitude of the increases, the rate-of-return regulation incentives, the necessity and prudence of the capital spending, and the operational and maintenance cost increases; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of San Dimas strongly opposes such significant rate increases without a thorough and transparent review process, including consideration of alternative funding methods and cost-saving measures that could mitigate the financial impact on the community; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby oppose the rate increase proposed by the Golden State Water Company in its GRC application (A.23-08-010).

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of San Dimas formally opposes the proposed rate increases outlined in GSWC's GRC application (A.23-08-010).

SECTION 2. The City Council urges the CPUC to carefully review and consider the impact of the proposed rate increases on San Dimas residents and to explore alternative solutions that do not disproportionately affect the financial stability of the community.

SECTION 3. The Mayor is authorized to submit this resolution along with any additional correspondence or documentation to the CPUC expressing the City’s position and concerns regarding the proposed rate increases.

Resolution 2024-40 Page 2
Opposing Golden State Water Company Rate Increase
June 11, 2024
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest and certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June 2024. __________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk
I, Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024-40 was approved by vote of the City Council of the City of San Dimas at its regular meeting of June 11, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of the Application of the

GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
(U133W) for an order (1) authorizing it to
increase rates for water service by
$87,060,700 or 22.95% in 2025;
(2) authorizing it to increase rates by
$20,699,200 or 4.42% in 2026, and
increase rates by $22,408,200 or 4.57% in
2027 in accordance with the Rate Case
Plan; and (3) adopting other related
rulings and relief necessary to implement
the Commission's ratemaking policies.

Application 23-08-010

PROTEST OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATES OFFICE TO GOLDEN STATE
WATER COMPANY’S APPLICATION 23-08-010

SHANNA FOLEY

BRETT PALMER
Attorneys for the
Public Advocates Office
California Public Utilities Commission
520 West 4th Street, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Telephone: (213) 576-5762
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]

MEHBOOB ASLAM
Analyst for the
Public Advocates Office
California Public Utilities Commission
520 West 4th Street, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Telephone: (213) 578-7781
Email: [email protected]
September 20, 2023
FILED
09/20/23
04:20 PM
A2308010
ATTACHMENT 2

520479141 1
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Rule 2.6 of the California Public Utilities Commission’s (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules), the Public Advocates Office at the California Public Utilities Commission (Cal Advocates) submits this protest to Golden State Water Company’s (Golden State’s) Application (A.) 23-08-010 for Authority to Increase Rates for Water Service in years 2025 through 2027 (Application).1 In A.23-08-010, Golden State seeks authorization to increase revenues by $87,060,700 over present rates for 2025, for total proposed test year revenues of $466,467,533. This represents a 22.95% increase over present rates. Golden State requests authorization for 2026 revenues totaling $488,804,738 and 2027 revenues totaling $512,961,749, which culminates in a total increase in average system rates of more than 34% at the end of the three-year period.2
The proposed revenue increases for Golden State’s eight individual ratemaking areas (RMAs) in the first year range from 8.10% in Bay Point to 32.05% in Santa Maria.3 Golden State asserts that its capital budget requests are the primary drivers of the increases in its RMAs.4 The largest drivers of the proposed increase in the General Office budget are the requested increases in employee benefits, “including [Golden State’s] request for cost recovery of the short-term incentive and the long-term performance compensation as well as an increase in forecasted pension costs.”5
1 Golden State filed its Application on August 14, 2023. The Application appeared on the Commission’s Daily Calendar on August 21, 2023. The deadline to respond under Rule 2.6(a) and Rule 1.15 is September 20, 2023. Therefore, this protest is timely filed. 2 A.23-08-010 Application of Golden State Water Company for an Order Authorizing a Change in Rates in its Region 1, Region 2, and Region 3 Customer Service Areas at RO Model Workpaper W_Reports_All at tab: Summ Incr. (August 14, 2023).
3 A.23-08-010 at 2.
4 A.23-08-010 lists the five “most significant” cost increases per ratemaking area (RMA); for all but three RMA, a “Return on Ratebase” increase caused by “capital additions” is listed as the number one cost increase. The exceptions Region 2 and Region 3, includes this item as its second most significant cost increase in the test year, and exception, Bay Point lists “Return on Ratebase” as its third most significant cost increase. A.23-08-010 at 19.
5 A.23-08-010 at 22.

520479141 2
Finally, Golden State requests recovery, continuation, creation, and closing of various memorandum and balancing accounts, which will impact customers’ bills.

II. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED
Cal Advocates protests the magnitude of Golden State’s proposed rate increases.

Cal Advocates will examine whether Golden State's recent rate increases have outpaced inflation and whether Golden State’s proposed rates are increasing at a higher rate relative to current and anticipated inflation.

Golden State proposes to increase rate base by 35% in some ratemaking areas.6 This level of increase is especially concerning given the financial incentives created under rate-of-return regulation.7 Unlike in a competitive environment where an entity’s capital spending is constrained by the prices customers would be willing to pay, capital spending under rate-of-return regulation determines the rates customers will pay and the profits included in those rates. Because of this, it is important for the Commission to act as a substitute for competition and ensure that authorized capital spending is necessary, prudent, and reasonable.

In addition to the magnitude of Golden State’s proposed capital spending, Cal Advocates protests Golden State’s proposed budget for Construction-Work-In-Progress (CWIP). Golden State forecasts a $141M annual budget for each year of the period 2025-2027. However, Golden State also forecasts an additional $273M over that same period for the completion of projects booked in recorded CWIP.8 Moreover, many of these projects were previously authorized in rates and thus ratepayers have paid the associated revenue requirement for these projects in past rates. Golden State has not shown that ratepayers have received any benefits from these past expenditures.

Cal Advocates is conducting the necessary discovery, review, and analysis to determine whether the requests made by Golden State in the Application are reasonable and 6 Application at 6-21.
7 Rate-of-return regulation is where an authorized rate of return is applied to an authorized rate base to determine the utility’s profits.
8 Direct Testimony of Elizabeth McDonough, Dane Sinagra, and David Schickling, Table 1 at 4.

520479141 3
in the public interest.9 Cal Advocates is also reviewing Golden State’s compliance with prior Commission decisions, including those adopting settlements in Golden State’s prior General Rate Cases (GRCs).

The following is a non-exhaustive list of issues in this proceeding:

General Issues:

1. Whether Golden State’s proposed rate increases for the Test Year and escalation years are just and reasonable, including:
a. Whether Golden State’s estimates for its operation and maintenance (O&M) and administrative and general (A&G)
expenses are reasonable;
b. Whether Golden State’s estimates of rate base are reasonable; c. Whether Golden State’s proposed additions to its plant budgets are accurate, reasonable, and justified;
d. Whether Golden State’s proposed cost allocation from its General Office is reasonable; and
e. Whether Golden State’s proposed sales forecasts and rate designs are just and reasonable.

2. The adequacy of Golden State’s customer service and safety programs.

3. Golden State’s compliance with all statutory and regulatory requirements.

Specific Issues:

4. Whether Golden State’s request to deviate from the Rate Case Plan for estimating rate base, book depreciation, and income taxes in its 2027 attrition filing is reasonable.

5. Whether Golden State’s proposed overhead rate and its proposed methodology for allocating its overhead costs are reasonable.

Special Requests:

6. Special Request 1: Whether Golden State’s report on the status of its authorized memorandum accounts and balancing accounts is accurate, and whether these accounts are reasonable and remain in the public interest.

7. Special Request 2: Whether the Commission should authorize Golden State to implement a new revenue decoupling program, the Water Conservation Advancement Plan (WCAP).

8. Special Request 3: Whether Golden State’s request to continue its current Sales Reconciliation Mechanism (SRM) is reasonable.
9 Pub. Util. Code Section 451 requires that “All charges demanded or received by any public utility . . . shall be just and reasonable. Every unjust or unreasonable charge demanded or received for such product or commodity or service is unlawful.”

520479141 4

9. Special Request 4: Whether the Commission should find that Golden State’s water quality meets all the applicable state end federal drinking water standards and the provisions of General Order 103-A.

10. Special Request 5: Whether the Commission should authorize Golden State to consolidate its Arden Cordova and Clearlake ratemaking areas, and, if so, whether Golden State’s calculations and proposals regarding the revenue requirements and rates in the consolidated ratemaking areas are reasonable.

11. Special Request 6: Whether Golden State’s request to continue its credit card payment program and recover the costs of the program through the Customer Assistance Program (CAP) balancing account is reasonable.

12. Special Request 7: Whether Golden State’s request to increase fire flow testing fees, reconnection fees, Cross Connection Control fees, and a new Tampering Fee is reasonable.

13. Special Request 8: Whether Goldan State’s request to modify its existing PFAS Memorandum Account to allow inclusion of carrying costs at Golden State’s adopted rate of return on all incremental plant investments to address treatment for PFAS is reasonable.

14. Special Request 9: Whether the Commission should authorize Golden State’s proposed pilot Supply Mix Adjustment Mechanism (SMAM) in its Region 2 ratemaking area, which would adjust the adopted well production volumes in the escalation years if a threshold trigger is met.

III. CATEGORIZATION
Cal Advocates does not oppose Golden State’s proposed categorization of this proceeding as ratesetting.

IV. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
The Commission should exercise its authority under Public Utilities Code Section 1701.3(h)(1) to prohibit ex-parte communications in this proceeding or, in the alternative, permit only all-party meetings. This will enhance transparency and better ensure that the decisions made in this proceeding are based solely on the evidentiary record.

V. NEED FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND

PROCEEDING SCHEDULE
Evidentiary hearings will be necessary if the parties are unable to settle all disputed issues in this proceeding. Therefore, the Commission should adopt a schedule that allows parties time to conduct discovery, prepare testimony, and participate in evidentiary hearings.

Further, Golden State’s customers—who will be impacted by the outcome of this

520479141 5
proceeding—should have an opportunity to express any particular concerns they may have regarding this proceeding through public participation hearings. A minimum of at least one public participation hearing in each of Golden State’s service territories should be scheduled early in this proceeding so that public comments may be incorporated into Cal Advocates’ analysis and testimony.10
The schedule proposed in Golden State’s final application generally follows the guidelines of the Rate Case Plan for Class A Water Utilities, after taking into consideration Golden State’s later filing date.11 Per the Commission’s Rate Case Plan, Golden State was scheduled to submit its Proposed Application on May 1, 2023.12 However, the Commission granted Golden State’s request for an extension to file its Proposed Application on June 1, 2023, and its Application on August 1, 2023.13 Subsequently, Golden State again requested an extension to file its Application on September 1, 2023 which the Commission granted. Notably, rather than file by September 1, 2023, Golden State filed its Final Application on August 14, 2023.14
As noted above, the Application appeared on the Commission’s Daily Calendar on August 21, 2023. Cal Advocates recommends adjustments to Golden State’s proposal to allow for additional time to prepare for and conduct settlement negotiations, as illustrated in the comparison of proposed schedules, below:
/ / /
/ / /
10 Pub. Util. Code Section 1711(a).
11 D.07-05-062, Appendix A at A-5.
12 D.07-05-062, Appendix A at A-6.
13 Letter from Jon Pierotti, GSWC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs to Rachel Peterson CPUC Executive Director (April 7, 2023). Letter from Rachel Peterson, CPUC Executive Director to Jon Pierotti, GSWC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs (April 26, 2023) (granting extension). 14 Letter from Jon Pierotti, GSWC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs to Rachel Peterson CPUC Executive Director (July 6, 2023). Letter from Rachel Peterson, CPUC Executive Director to Jon Pierotti, GSWC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs (July 14, 2023) (granting extension).

520479141 6
ITEM

CAL ADVOCATES

PROPOSED DATE DAY

GOLDEN STATE

PROPOSAL DAY
Application Filed August 14, 2023 0 August 14, 2023 0
Protests Due September 20, 2023 37 (omitted)
Utility Response to
Protests (optional) October 2, 2023 47 (omitted)
Prehearing
Conference
September 20 to
October 30, 2023 10–75 August 24 to
October 28, 2023 10-75
Public
Participation
Hearing
September 20, 2023, to
February 20, 2024 10–190 August 24, 2023, to
February 20, 2024 10-190
Final Update of
Golden State’s
Showing
November 22, 2023 100 November 22, 2023 100
Public Advocates
Office Serves
Testimony
March 5, 2024 204 February 20, 2024 190
Other Intervenors
Serve Testimony March 19, 2024 218 March 5, 2024 204
Golden State
Serves Rebuttal
Testimony
May 6, 2024 264 April 22, 2024 250
Settlement
Discussions and
ADR
May 20 to
June 10, 2024
280-300
April 26 to
May 16, 2024 256-276
Evidentiary
Hearings
June 24 to
July 15, 2024
314-334 May 16 to
Jun 5, 2024
276-296
Opening Briefs
Filed and Served August 12, 2024 364 July 5, 2024 326
Motion for Interim
Rates August 12, 2024 364 July 5, 2024 326
Mandatory Status
Conference August 13, 2024 365 July 8, 2024 327
Reply Briefs Filed August 22, 2024 374 July 15, 2024 336 Water Division
Technical
Conference
September 11, 2024 394 August 5, 2024 356
Proposed Decision
Mailed December 10, 2024 484 November 4, 2024 446

520479141 7

ITEM CAL ADVOCATES

PROPOSED DATE DAY

GOLDEN STATE

PROPOSAL DAY
Comments on
Proposed Decision
Served
December 30, 2024 504 November 22, 2024 466
Reply Comments
Served January 6, 2025 509 November 27, 2024 471
Commission
Decision January 20, 2025 524 December 12, 2024 486
VI. CONCLUSION
Golden State’s Application raises numerous issues regarding the continued provision of safe and reliable service at the lowest possible cost. The prudency of Golden State’s operations and proposed expenditures must be reviewed to ensure that the relief requested is just and reasonable. Cal Advocates plans to conduct the necessary discovery, review, and analysis to determine whether Golden State’s proposals are reasonable and in the public interest.

Evidentiary hearings may be required, and a schedule should be established that allows for a diligent review of issues identified in this protest. Since discovery is ongoing, Cal Advocates reserves the right to address any other issues that may arise in the course of this proceeding.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ BRETT PALMER
Brett Palmer
Attorney for the Public Advocates Office
California Public Utilities Commission
520 West 4th Street, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Telephone: (213) 576-5762
September 20, 2023 Email: [email protected]

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of the Application of the GOLDEN STATE
WATER COMPANY (U 133 W) for an order (1)
authorizing it to increase rates for water service by
$49,518,400 or 14.97% in 2022; (2) authorizing it to
increase rates by $16,107,100 or 4.22% in 2023, and
increase rates by $17,207,900 or 4.31% in 2024 in
accordance with the Rate Case Plan; and (3) adopting
other related rulings and relief necessary to implement the Commission's ratemaking policies
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
APPLICATION NO.

APPLICATION OF GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY

FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING A CHANGE IN RATES
IN ITS REGION 1, REGION 2 AND REGION 3

CUSTOMER SERVICE AREAS

GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
Keith Switzer
630 East Foothill Boulevard
San Dimas, CA 91773-9016
(909) 394-3600, Ext. 680
Joseph M. Karp
Winston & Strawn LLP
101 California Street, 39th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-5894
Telephone: (415) 591-1000
Facsimile: (415) 591-1400
Email: [email protected]
Attorney for Golden State Water Company
July 15, 2020
ATTACHMENT 3

Table of Contents
i

APPLICATION OF GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY

FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING A CHANGE IN RATES
IN ITS REGION 1, REGION 2 AND REGION 3

CUSTOMER SERVICE AREAS
SECTION I AUTHORITY FOR FILING ........................................................................... 1 SECTION II STATEMENT OF RELIEF SOUGHT........................................................... 2

1. General Relief .......................................................................................................... 2

2. General Rate Case Application Requirements ........................................................ 3 A. Arden Cordova Customer Service Area ............................................................... 3 B. Bay Point Customer Service Area ........................................................................ 5 C. Clearlake Customer Service Area ........................................................................ 7 D. Los Osos Customer Service Area ...................................................................... 12 E. Santa Maria Customer Service Area .................................................................. 14 G. Simi Valley Customer Service Area ................................................................... 16 H. Region 2 ............................................................................................................. 18 I. Region 3 .............................................................................................................. 20 J. General Office ..................................................................................................... 22

3. Special Requests ................................................................................................... 23

1. Balancing and Memorandum Accounts .............................................................. 23

2. Balancing Account for Group Medical Insurance Costs ...................................... 24

3. Sales Reconciliation Mechanism ........................................................................ 24

4. Inclusion of Credit Card Payment Option in Rates ............................................. 25

5. Rate Treatment of Previously Approved Advice Letter Projects ......................... 26

6. Conversion to Monthly Billing ............................................................................. 26

7. Finding on Water Quality .................................................................................... 27

8. Liability Insurance Balancing Account ................................................................ 27

9. 123-TCP Contamination Proceeds ..................................................................... 28

Table of Contents (Cont.)
ii

10. COVID-19 Memorandum Account .................................................................... 28

11. Residential Rate Design ................................................................................... 28

12. Guidance on Treatment of Proceeds from Water Rights Transfer .................... 29

13. Consolidation of Los Osos and Santa Maria for Ratemaking Purposes ........... 29

14. Presentation of Billing Units on Customer Bills ................................................. 29

4. Issues of Controversy ............................................................................................ 30

5. Proposed Notices .................................................................................................. 31

6. Testimony Requirements A through L ................................................................... 31

7. Additional Information ............................................................................................ 31 SECTION III 2020 FILING COMPLIANCE .................................................................... 33 SECTION IV FORMAL MATTERS AND PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS ............... 34 SECTION V CAUSE OF APPLICATION ...................................................................... 36 SECTION VI REPORTS AND HEARINGS ................................................................... 37 SECTION VII PRAYER ................................................................................................. 38

1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of the Application of the GOLDEN STATE
WATER COMPANY (U 133 W) for an order (1)
authorizing it to increase rates for water service by
$49,518,400 or 14.97% in 2022; (2) authorizing it to
increase rates by $16,107,100 or 4.22% in 2023, and
increase rates by $17,207,900 or 4.31% in 2024 in
accordance with the Rate Case Plan; and (3) adopting
other related rulings and relief necessary to implement the Commission's ratemaking policies

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
APPLICATION NO.

APPLICATION OF GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY

FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING A CHANGE IN RATES
IN ITS REGION 1, REGION 2 AND REGION 3

CUSTOMER SERVICE AREAS

SECTION I

AUTHORITY FOR FILING
Pursuant to Rule 3.2 of the California Public Utilities Commission’s (Commission’s) Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules) and Sections 454 et. Seq. of the California Public Utilities (PU) Code, and in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 4 of D.07-05-062 and its Appendix (the Rate Case Plan or RCP), Golden State Water Company (Golden State or Applicant) respectfully submits this Application for a general rate increase in its eight ratemaking areas.

2 SECTION II

STATEMENT OF RELIEF SOUGHT
By this Application, Golden State requests authority from the Commission to change rates for water service in all of its eight ratemaking areas – Arden Cordova, Bay Point, Clearlake, Los Osos, Santa Maria and Simi Valley Customer Service Areas (CSAs) (collectively referred to as Region 1), Region 2 and Region 3. The rate changes will also allow Golden State to invest in crucial plant, property and other equipment needed to provide safe and reliable service to its customers. This Application is filed in accordance with Decision (D.) 07-05-062.

1. General Relief
The table below shows the annual changes in revenue requirement requested by Golden State. The revenue requirement changes for 2022 are based on comparisons to estimated 2022 revenues at current rates. The increases for 2023 & 2024 represent the increase over the prior year at proposed rates ($ in thousands):

Ratemaking Area Increase 2022 Increase 2023 Increase 2024 Arden Cordova 2,876.7 19.03% 622.6 3.44% 691.6 3.66%
Bay Point 496.7 7.82% 177.6 2.59% 212.0 3.00%
Clearlake 484.3 21.00% 117.7 4.22% 132.7 4.57%
Coastal
Consolidated1 2,317.7 12.06% 682.3 3.12% 755.3 3.30%
Los Osos 783.1 19.78% 196.4 4.13% 215.1 4.34%
Santa Maria 1,533.44 10.05% 498.1 2.91% 556.0 3.10%
Simi Valley 736.7 4.92% 457.3 2.90% 501.5 3.07%
Region 2 23,465.5 16.66% 7,138.4 4.34% 7,788.5 4.52%
Region 3 19,140.9 14.51% 6,911.2 4.56% 7,126.4 4.48%
Total2 49,518.4 14.97% 16,107.1 4.22% 17,207.9 4.31%

1 Coastal Consolidated is the consolidation of the Los Osos and Santa Maria Customer Service Areas for ratemaking purposes. See Special Request #13 for more details. 2 Total does not include Los Osos and Santa Maria data on a stand-alone basis

3 2. General Rate Case Application Requirements
A. Arden Cordova Customer Service Area
i. Summary of Requested Revenue Requirement and Rate Base Changes
Below is a table comparing the proposed revenue requirement for the 2022 test year for the Arden Cordova Customer Service Area with the adopted revenue requirement for the current 2020 escalation year, and the recorded data for the twelve (12) month period ending December 2019.

Arden Cordova Comparison of Proposed Increase
Proposed Test
Year 2022
2020
Escalation
Year3
12-Month Period
Ending 12/31/19
Total Revenue Requirement $ $17,999,700 $14,320,700 $13,542,800 Rate Base $ $54,243,900 $35,363,900 $35,577,500
Rate Base Difference $18,880,000 $18,666,400
Rate Base % Increase 53.39% 52.47%
Operating Expenses $ $13,708,500 $11,523,400 $10,794,800 Operating Expense $ Difference $2,185,100 $2,913,700
Operating Expenses % Difference 18.96% 26.99%
Rate of Return 7.91% 7.91% 7.72%
* Recorded expenses reflect one-time credits recorded to offset recovery of amounts booked to memorandum accounts and approved for amortization.
ii. Primary Cost Increases – The following are the five most significant cost increases for the Arden Cordova Customer Service Area.
a. Return on Rate Base – The forecasted rate base for 2022 is $18,880,000 higher than the adopted rate base for 2020. The increase in rate base requires an increase in net operating revenues of $1,494,000 based on the currently authorized rate

3 Advice Letter 1797-W

4 of return of 7.91%. This increase in rate base is due to the proposed capital additions in the Arden Cordova Customer Service Area that are addressed in the Operating Districts Capital Additions and the Construction Work in Progress Testimonies. b. Property Taxes – The increase in property taxes of $1,138,700 is a result of a forecasted increase in the property tax rate to reflect recent property tax rates combined with a forecasted increase in rate base. Forecasted Property Taxes are addressed in the prepared testimony of Brad Powell.
c. Allocated General Office and District Office – The 2022 forecasted General Office and District Office expense is $387,900 higher than the adopted 2020 level. The increase is a result of higher forecasted General Office expenses; see Section J below for the five most significant increases in the General Office. See the prepared testimony of Brad Powell for a more detailed discussion of the General Office expenses. d. Federal Income Tax – The increase in federal income taxes of $245,300 is primarily a result of Golden State forecasting net operating revenues that are higher than the amount previously adopted. This increase in net operating revenues is primarily a result of anticipated additions to utility plant. A discussion of the income tax calculation is included in the prepared testimony of Wayne McDonald. e. Other Operation Expenses – The increase in other operation expenses of $143,600 is a result of a forecasted increase in lab fees for new testing requirements and a request for increased water conservation expenses. A discussion of other operation expense is discussed in the prepared testimony of Brad Powell. A discussion of the water conservation expense is discussed in the prepared testimony of Edwin DeLeon.

5 B. Bay Point Customer Service Area
i. Summary of Requested Revenue Requirement and Rate Base Changes
Below is a table comparing the proposed revenue requirement for the 2022 test year for the Bay Point Customer Service Area with the adopted revenue requirements for the current 2020 escalation year and recorded data for the twelve (12) month period ending December 2019.

Bay Point Comparison of Proposed Increase
Proposed
Test Year
2022
2020
Escalation
Year4
12-Month Period
Ending 12/31/19
Total Revenue Requirement $ $6,846,700 $6,137,700 $5,873,700 Rate Base $ $17,328,300 $14,639,100 $14,511,100
Rate Base Difference $2,689,200 $2,817,200
Rate Base % Increase 18.37% 19.41%
Operating Expenses $ $5,475,900 $4,979,700 $4,716,700
Operating Expense $ Difference $496,200 $759,200
Operating Expenses % Difference 9.96% 16.10%
Rate of Return 7.91% 7.91% 7.97%
* Recorded expenses reflect one-time credits recorded to offset recovery of amounts booked to memorandum accounts and approved for amortization.
ii. Primary Cost Increases – The following are the five most significant cost increases for the Bay Point Customer Service Area.
a. Return on Rate Base – The forecasted rate base for 2022 is $2,689,200 higher than the adopted rate base for 2020. The increase in rate base requires an increase in net operating revenues of $212,900 based on the currently authorized rate of

4 Advice Letter 1820-W

6 return of 7.91%. This increase in rate base is due to the proposed capital additions in the Bay Point Customer Service Area that are addressed in the Operating Districts Capital Additions and the Construction Work in Progress Testimonies. b. Purchased Water – The increase in purchased water of $187,500 is a result of higher than adopted purveyor rates from Contra Costa Water District. A discussion of the purchased water expense is discussed in the prepared testimony of Nanci Tran.
c. Allocated General Office and District Office – The 2022 forecasted General Office and District Office expense is $85,100 higher than the adopted 2020 level.

The increase is a result of higher forecasted General Office expenses; see Section J below for the five most significant increases in the General Office. See the prepared testimony of Brad Powell for a more detailed discussion of the General Office expenses. d. Property Taxes – The increase in property taxes of $55,700 is a result of an increase in rate base, which is higher than the amount previously adopted. This increase is a result of anticipated additions to plant. Forecasted Property Taxes are addressed in the prepared testimony of Brad Powell.
e. Depreciation – The 2022 forecasted Depreciation expense is $37,200 higher than the adopted 2020 level. The increase in depreciation is a result of anticipated additions to plant. See prepared testimony of Jon Pierotti for information on Depreciation expense.

7 C. Clearlake Customer Service Area
i. Summary of Requested Revenue Requirement and Rate Base Changes
Below is a table comparing the proposed revenue requirement for the 2022 test year for the Clearlake Customer Service Area with the adopted revenue requirements for the current 2020 escalation year and recorded data for the twelve (12) month period ending December 2019.

Clearlake Comparison of Proposed Increase
Proposed
Test Year
2022
2020
Escalation
Year5
12-Month Period
Ending 12/31/19
Total Revenue Requirement $ $2,790,100 $2,511,700 $2,173,900 Rate Base $ $10,317,400 $8,662,500 $8,721,400
Rate Base Difference $1,654,900 $1,596,000
Rate Base % Increase 19.10% 18.30%
Operating Expenses $ $1,973,900 $1,826,500 $1,699,700
Operating Expense $ Difference $147,400 $274,200
Operating Expenses % Difference 8.07% 16.13%
Rate of Return 7.91% 7.91% 5.44%
* Recorded expenses reflect one-time credits recorded to offset recovery of amounts booked to memorandum accounts and approved for amortization.
ii. Primary Cost Increases – The following are the five most significant cost increases for the Clearlake Customer Service Area.
a. Return on Rate Base – The forecasted rate base for 2022 is $1,654,900 higher than the adopted rate base for 2020. The increase in rate base requires an increase in net operating revenues of $131,000 based on the currently authorized rate of

5 Advice Letter 1799-W

8 return of 7.91%. This increase in rate base is due to the capital additions in the Clearlake Customer Service Area that are addressed in the Operating Districts Capital Additions and the Construction Work in Progress Testimonies.
b. Pension and Benefits – The increase in pension and benefits expense of $35,000 is a result of a forecasted increase in pension expense costs. A discussion of the pension expense is included in the prepared testimony of Gladys Farrow. c. Injuries and Damages – The 2022 forecasted Injuries and Damages expense is $30,400 higher than the adopted 2020 level. The increase is due to a forecasted increase in liability insurance premiums. See the prepared testimony of Matt Currie for a more detailed discussion of the Injuries and Damages expenses. d. Federal Income Tax – The increase in federal income taxes of $25,200 is primarily a result of Golden State forecasting net operating revenues that are higher than the amount previously adopted. This increase in net operating revenues is primarily a result of anticipated additions to utility plant. A discussion of the income tax calculation is included in the prepared testimony of Wayne McDonald. e. Local Taxes – The 2022 forecasted Local Taxes expense is $22,800 higher than the adopted 2020 level. The increase is a result of a new tax paid to the City of Clearlake that is not reflected in 2020 rates. A discussion of the local taxes calculation is included in the prepared testimony of Brad Powell.

9 D. Coastal Consolidated (Los Osos and Santa Maria)
Special Request #13, addressed below, requests the consolidation of the Los Osos and Santa Maria areas for ratemaking purposes. Golden State presents the Summary of Requested Revenue Requirement and Rate Base Changes and the Primary Cost Increases on a consolidated basis, followed by the required information for the two areas on a stand-alone basis.
i. Summary of Requested Revenue Requirement and Rate Base Changes
Below is a table comparing the proposed revenue requirement for the 2022 test year for the Coastal Consolidated Customer Service Areas with the adopted revenue requirements for the current 2020 escalation year and recorded data for the twelve (12) month period ending December 2019.

Coastal Consolidated Comparison of Proposed Increase
Proposed
Test Year
2022
2020
Escalation
Year6
12-Month Period
Ending 12/31/19
Total Revenue Requirement $ $21,538,400 $18,141,100 $17,441,700 Rate Base $ $83,335,300 $65,853,200 $64,912,100
Rate Base Difference $17,482,100 $18,423,200
Rate Base % Increase 26.55% 28.38%
Operating Expenses $ $14,945,800 $12,932,200 $12,191,500 Operating Expense $ Difference $2,013,600 $2,754,300
Operating Expenses % Difference 15.57% 22.59%
Rate of Return 7.91% 7.91% 8.09%
* Recorded expenses reflect one-time credits recorded to offset recovery of amounts booked to memorandum accounts and approved for amortization.

6 Advice Letters 1801-W and 1805-W

10 ii. Primary Cost Increases – Special Request #13, discussed in Section II.3 below, requests rate consolidation of the Los Osos and Santa Maria Customer Service Areas. If Golden State’s request is approved, $780,600 of the proposed increase in cost of service in 2022 for the Los Osos CSA would be recovered in rates in Santa Maria. This reallocation of the increased cost of service in Los Osos is not included as an individual item in the itemization of significant cost increases described in this section. However, the portion of the cost increases described below, as they relate to Los Osos, are also part of the reallocation of costs to Santa Maria rates. The following are the five most significant cost increases for the Coastal Consolidated Customer Service Areas. a. Return on Rate Base – The forecasted rate base for 2022 is $17,482,100 higher than the adopted rate base for 2020. The increase in rate base requires an increase in net operating revenues of $1,383,700, based on the currently authorized rate of return of 7.91%. This change in rate base is due to the capital additions in the Los Osos and Santa Maria Customer Service Areas that are addressed in the Operating Districts Capital Additions and Construction Work in Progress Testimonies. b. Depreciation – The 2022 forecasted Depreciation expense is $414,100 higher than the adopted 2020 level. The increase in depreciation is a result of anticipated additions to plant. See prepared testimony of Brad Powell for a more detailed discussion on Depreciation expense.
c. Allocated General Office and District Office – The 2022 forecasted General Office and District Office expense is $414,000 higher than the adopted 2020 level. The increase is a result of higher forecasted General Office expenses; see Section J below for the five most significant increases in the General Office. See the prepared testimony of Brad Powell for a more detailed discussion of the General Office expenses.

11 d. Federal Income Tax – The increase in federal income taxes of $233,500 is primarily a result of Golden State forecasting net operating revenues that are higher than the amount previously adopted. This increase in net operating revenues is primarily a result of anticipated additions to utility plant. A discussion of the income tax calculation is included in the prepared testimony of Wayne McDonald. e. Purchased Power – The 2022 forecasted Purchased Power expense for pumping water is $233,700 higher than the adopted 2020 level. The increase is a combination of higher electric rates and higher forecasted pumped water volumes. See prepared testimony of Nanci Tran for a more detailed discussion of the purchased power expense.

12 E. Los Osos Customer Service Area
i. Summary of Requested Revenue Requirement and Rate Base Changes
Below is a table comparing the proposed revenue requirement for the 2022 test year for the Los Osos Customer Service Area with the adopted revenue requirements for the current 2020 escalation year and recorded data for the twelve (12) month period ending December 2019.

Los Osos Comparison of Proposed Increase
Proposed
Test Year
2022
2020
Escalation
Year7
12-Month Period
Ending 12/31/19
Total Revenue Requirement $ $4,741,600 $3,989,000 $3,816,600 Rate Base $ $19,507,200 $15,553,100 $15,359,800
Rate Base Difference $3,954,100 $4,147,400
Rate Base % Increase 25.42% 27.00%
Operating Expenses $ $3,198,400 $2,758,800 $2,600,400
Operating Expense $ Difference $439,600 $598,000
Operating Expenses % Difference 15.93% 23.00%
Rate of Return 7.91% 7.91% 7.92%
* Recorded expenses reflect one-time credits recorded to offset recovery of amounts booked to memorandum accounts and approved for amortization.

ii. Primary Cost Increases – The following are the five most significant cost increases for the Los Osos Customer Service Area.
a. Return on Rate Base – The forecasted rate base for 2022 is $3,954,100 higher than the adopted rate base for 2020. The increase in rate base requires an increase in net operating revenues of $313,000 based on the currently authorized rate of

7 Advice Letter 1805-W