Agenda packet, first session — San Dimas City Council, December 10, 2024 (part 2 of 12)

ꢊꢐꢂꢄꢑꢒꢊꢏꢄꢈꢉꢄꢁꢀꢓꢄꢃꢒꢔꢀꢁ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢁꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢀꢆꢇꢂꢄꢈꢉꢄꢊꢀꢋꢀꢌꢆꢂꢄꢍꢎꢈꢍꢂꢎꢊꢏ
ꢕꢖꢗꢘꢙꢗꢚꢄꢛꢄꢕꢖꢕꢜꢙꢕꢘ ꢊꢝꢞꢝ !"ꢄꢍ#$%"#&'ꢄꢅꢝ!(")
ꢑꢝ&".$#'
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢁꢅꢆꢃꢇꢈ
ꢉꢊꢋꢋꢁꢌꢍꢃꢇꢈ
ꢎꢅꢄꢏꢂꢆꢌꢃꢇꢈ
ꢕꢖꢗꢘꢙꢗꢚ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢁꢀꢂꢀꢁꢅꢂꢆ
ꢉꢃꢉꢁꢆꢇꢄꢁꢂꢄꢂ
ꢂꢈꢈꢁꢀꢃꢊꢁꢇꢅꢉ
ꢕꢖꢗꢚꢙꢗ*
ꢀꢁꢇꢈꢈꢁꢈꢆꢅꢁꢇꢃꢃ
ꢄꢊꢉꢁꢆꢃꢄꢁꢃꢅꢅ
ꢂꢈꢈꢁꢆꢆꢈꢁꢀꢃꢈ
ꢕꢖꢗ*ꢙꢗ+
ꢀꢁꢄꢃꢂꢁꢅꢇꢈꢁꢂꢇꢃ
ꢄꢆꢉꢁꢅꢂꢄꢁꢀꢄꢊ
ꢂꢅꢈꢁꢉꢇꢇꢁꢅꢂꢂ
ꢕꢖꢗ+ꢙꢗ,
ꢀꢁꢈꢂꢅꢁꢅꢉꢉꢁꢄꢅꢉ
ꢄꢄꢊꢁꢇꢆꢂꢁꢈꢃꢃ
ꢂꢅꢂꢁꢄꢆꢆꢁꢊꢊꢂ
ꢕꢖꢗ,ꢙꢗꢇꢁꢊꢊꢅꢁꢇꢇꢃꢁꢇꢉꢄ
ꢄꢈꢈꢁꢂꢂꢇꢁꢅꢄꢉ
ꢂꢅꢅꢁꢉꢀꢇꢁꢃꢅꢃ
ꢇꢇꢁꢈꢈꢊ
ꢕꢖꢗ-ꢙꢕꢖ
ꢇꢁꢆꢀꢃꢁꢀꢂꢈꢁꢃꢉꢅ
ꢃꢊꢅꢁꢇꢂꢄꢁꢉꢅꢆ
ꢀꢊꢈꢁꢃꢄꢈꢁꢅꢄꢇ
ꢇꢉꢁꢃꢃꢃ
ꢕꢖꢕꢖꢙꢕꢗ
ꢇꢁꢀꢂꢅꢁꢅꢉꢆꢁꢅꢊꢆ
ꢃꢀꢂꢁꢄꢆꢀꢁꢈꢉꢉ
ꢀꢆꢅꢁꢇꢅꢇꢁꢀꢇꢈ
ꢇꢄꢁꢄꢅꢂ
ꢕꢖꢕꢗꢙꢕꢕ
ꢇꢁꢇꢃꢃꢁꢇꢂꢆꢁꢊꢂꢄ
ꢃꢃꢊꢁꢈꢅꢆꢁꢇꢃꢃ
ꢀꢂꢄꢁꢈꢇꢅꢁꢂꢉꢃ
ꢇꢃꢁꢆꢃꢉ
ꢕꢖꢕꢕꢙꢕꢜ
ꢇꢁꢃꢉꢆꢁꢂꢀꢂꢁꢆꢈꢅ
ꢈꢊꢀꢁꢄꢈꢇꢁꢃꢅꢀ
ꢀꢇꢊꢁꢃꢃꢀꢁꢅꢀꢅ
ꢇꢈꢁꢆꢆꢈ
ꢕꢖꢕꢜꢙꢕꢘ
ꢇꢁꢅꢈꢇꢁꢃꢉꢈꢁꢃꢊꢂ
ꢈꢇꢂꢁꢀꢃꢄꢁꢅꢂꢆ
ꢀꢄꢈꢁꢃꢅꢃꢁꢂꢉꢄ
ꢐꢊꢑꢆꢒꢓꢔꢕꢅꢁꢄ ꢇꢅꢁꢊꢈꢊ
ꢎꢅꢂꢆꢃꢆꢏꢆꢃꢊꢅꢇꢈ
ꢎꢌꢌꢃꢖꢇꢆꢁꢄ
ꢄꢇꢁꢉꢅꢅꢁꢃꢉꢃ
ꢆꢀꢅꢁꢉꢉꢂ
ꢃꢂꢁꢆꢃꢃꢁꢃꢂꢃ
ꢆꢇꢊꢁꢀꢇꢂ
ꢃꢇꢁꢀꢂꢉꢁꢆꢅꢅ
ꢆꢅꢅꢁꢅꢊꢈ
ꢈꢃꢁꢉꢊꢄꢁꢈꢉꢈ
ꢂꢊꢀꢁꢅꢊꢉ
ꢅꢃꢁꢂꢇꢆꢁꢈꢈꢂ
ꢂꢊꢃꢁꢅꢈꢆ
ꢅꢉꢁꢅꢇꢇꢁꢂꢅꢉ
ꢇꢀꢁꢇꢄꢊ
ꢆꢆꢈꢁꢇꢇꢇꢁꢃꢊꢇ
ꢇꢇꢁꢀꢂꢈ
ꢆꢂꢉꢁꢃꢃꢉꢁꢂꢀꢂ
ꢇꢇꢁꢃꢈꢃ
ꢆꢂꢃꢁꢀꢊꢂꢁꢆꢇꢂ
ꢆꢁꢈꢈꢆꢁꢊꢊꢊ
ꢆꢃꢄ
ꢆꢀꢄꢁꢈꢈꢈꢁꢅꢉꢀ
ꢆꢁꢅꢆꢈꢁꢄꢂꢊ
ꢗꢃꢂꢍꢁꢈꢈꢇꢅꢁꢊꢏꢂ
ꢀꢁꢍꢌꢁꢇꢆꢃꢊꢅꢇꢈ
ꢘꢇꢍꢇꢅꢆ
ꢉꢀꢊꢁꢊꢆꢀ
ꢆꢆꢁꢉꢉꢊꢁꢆꢆꢈ
ꢄꢅꢁꢄꢊꢊꢁꢊꢊꢄ
ꢅꢉꢅꢁꢀꢄꢀ
ꢆꢂꢁꢉꢉꢃꢁꢂꢅꢊ
ꢄꢄꢁꢆꢄꢊꢁꢀꢊꢆ
ꢅꢉꢅꢁꢀꢄꢀ
ꢆꢀꢁꢆꢉꢇꢁꢂꢇꢉ
ꢄꢅꢁꢀꢊꢉꢁꢀꢈꢃ
ꢀꢆꢈꢁꢅꢈꢄ
ꢆꢀꢁꢀꢅꢂꢁꢊꢇꢂ
ꢈꢊꢁꢆꢄꢄꢁꢉꢆꢃ
ꢀꢆꢈꢁꢅꢈꢄ
ꢂꢆꢁꢂꢃꢀꢁꢀꢀꢀ
ꢈꢆꢁꢈꢉꢃꢁꢃꢃꢊ
ꢀꢆꢈꢁꢅꢈꢄ
ꢈꢁꢇꢀꢊꢁꢉꢇꢇ
ꢅꢊꢁꢈꢅꢉꢁꢄꢅꢉ
ꢀꢆꢈꢁꢅꢈꢄ
ꢈꢁꢉꢅꢅꢁꢆꢇꢇ
ꢆꢊꢀꢁꢂꢉꢀꢁꢅꢆꢃ
ꢉꢃꢂꢁꢀꢄꢅ
ꢅꢁꢆꢃꢉꢁꢉꢄꢈ
ꢆꢊꢇꢁꢉꢄꢈꢁꢅꢊꢃ
ꢃꢈꢁꢇꢊꢃ
ꢅꢁꢀꢉꢅꢁꢊꢄꢇ
ꢆꢆꢂꢁꢃꢇꢈꢁꢃꢆꢅ
ꢃꢈꢁꢇꢊꢃ
ꢅꢁꢉꢇꢄꢁꢂꢂꢈ
ꢆꢂꢉꢁꢊꢉꢄꢁꢇꢊꢅ
ꢙꢚꢛꢓꢜꢊꢅꢏꢅꢃꢆꢇꢌꢝ ꢃꢈꢁꢇꢊꢃ
ꢉꢌꢊꢂꢂꢓꢀꢁꢞꢁꢌꢁꢅꢍꢁ
ꢅꢂꢁꢍꢏꢌꢁꢄ
ꢛ!ꢁꢋ"ꢆ
ꢉꢊꢁꢀꢀꢀꢁꢆꢆꢃ
ꢆꢈꢇꢁꢂꢈꢀꢁꢂꢊꢅ
ꢋꢂꢆꢁꢅꢅꢅꢁꢀꢉꢈꢌ
ꢂꢉꢄꢁꢊꢃꢉ
ꢉꢂꢁꢊꢄꢈꢁꢃꢂꢆ
ꢂꢊꢊꢁꢂꢂꢅꢁꢂꢉꢇ
ꢋꢂꢂꢁꢊꢂꢂꢁꢂꢇꢀꢌ
ꢉꢂꢁꢅꢅꢈꢁꢅꢀꢆ
ꢂꢂꢂꢁꢀꢄꢆꢁꢆꢇꢀ
ꢋꢂꢆꢁꢅꢆꢀꢁꢃꢀꢅꢌ
ꢉꢇꢁꢇꢇꢈꢁꢊꢊꢊ
ꢆꢅꢈꢁꢆꢆꢃꢁꢊꢇꢃ
ꢋꢂꢆꢁꢄꢉꢆꢁꢄꢃꢂꢌ
ꢉꢈꢁꢂꢀꢊꢁꢄꢅꢅ
ꢆꢅꢉꢁꢅꢆꢄꢁꢅꢆꢉ
ꢋꢂꢂꢁꢃꢃꢃꢁꢄꢈꢀꢌ
ꢄꢂꢁꢈꢂꢀꢁꢂꢂꢉ
ꢆꢅꢃꢁꢅꢂꢇꢁꢀꢉꢊ
ꢋꢂꢊꢁꢃꢇꢈꢁꢂꢃꢈꢌ
ꢄꢇꢁꢂꢃꢄꢁꢉꢇꢃ
ꢆꢅꢆꢁꢆꢅꢇꢁꢇꢀꢆ
ꢋꢂꢊꢁꢃꢅꢂꢁꢆꢅꢊꢌ
ꢈꢂꢁꢄꢇꢊꢁꢃꢂꢆ
ꢂꢊꢄꢁꢃꢆꢉꢁꢄꢀꢊ
ꢋꢂꢊꢁꢃꢈꢆꢁꢀꢅꢈꢌ
ꢆꢀꢊꢁꢀꢇꢄꢁꢆꢅꢆ
ꢂꢀꢅꢁꢇꢂꢉꢁꢂꢊꢇ
ꢋꢂꢊꢁꢄꢉꢃꢁꢇꢀꢇꢌ
ꢆꢇꢆꢁꢂꢇꢉꢁꢅꢂꢇ
ꢂꢂꢅꢁꢉꢊꢃꢁꢂꢆꢇ
ꢋꢂꢊꢁꢄꢉꢃꢁꢇꢀꢇꢌ
ꢅ#ꢅꢊꢕꢅ
$ꢔ$%&ꢙ ꢇꢁꢉꢂꢆꢁꢉꢄꢆꢁꢈꢃꢉ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢂꢅꢉ
ꢇꢁꢃꢈꢄꢁꢇꢊꢃꢁꢄꢉꢂ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢂꢅꢀ
ꢉꢁꢊꢂꢊꢁꢊꢈꢀꢁꢀꢂꢈ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢀꢊꢊ
ꢉꢁꢂꢆꢃꢁꢆꢀꢂꢁꢅꢂꢅ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢂꢉꢄ
ꢉꢁꢇꢉꢂꢁꢂꢅꢅꢁꢄꢄꢇ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢂꢅꢃ
ꢉꢁꢄꢆꢆꢁꢅꢉꢊꢁꢄꢇꢄ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢂꢈꢈ
ꢉꢁꢈꢄꢈꢁꢇꢅꢂꢁꢂꢀꢄ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢂꢅꢉ
ꢄꢁꢆꢊꢇꢁꢂꢊꢈꢁꢆꢈꢃ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢂꢈꢈ
ꢄꢁꢉꢆꢄꢁꢈꢃꢅꢁꢅꢇꢂ
ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢀꢊꢅ
ꢄꢁꢈꢇꢊꢁꢃꢉꢀꢁꢃꢂꢃ
$ꢊꢆꢇꢈꢓ'ꢃꢌꢁꢍꢆꢓꢀꢇꢆꢁ ꢊꢍꢊꢅꢀꢊꢈ
ꢓ$&")/
ꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢋꢀꢈꢌꢃꢀꢍꢎꢆꢀꢏꢍꢐꢉꢊꢑꢃꢑꢀꢏꢍꢀꢒꢎꢆꢈꢉꢓꢀ
ꢔꢍꢀꢕꢖꢗꢘꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢇꢎꢆꢃꢌꢋꢀꢎꢚꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢛꢆꢈꢆꢃꢀꢎꢚꢀꢜꢈꢉꢏꢚꢎꢌꢍꢏꢈꢀꢅꢈꢋꢋꢃꢑꢀꢝꢌꢎꢅꢎꢋꢏꢆꢏꢎꢍꢀꢕꢞꢀ ꢙꢏꢐꢙꢀꢉꢏꢄꢏꢆꢃꢑꢀꢆꢈꢂꢃꢋꢀꢆꢎꢀꢈꢀꢆꢎꢆꢈꢉꢀꢄꢈꢂꢏꢄꢊꢄꢀꢌꢈꢆꢃꢀꢎꢚꢀꢕ!"ꢀ#ꢈꢋꢃꢑꢀꢊꢅꢎꢍꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢈꢋꢋꢃꢋꢋꢃꢑꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢀꢎꢚꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢅꢌꢎꢅꢃꢌꢆ$ꢀ#ꢃꢏꢍ%ꢀꢆꢈꢂꢃꢑꢓꢀꢁꢈꢐꢙꢀ$ꢃꢈꢌ"ꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢈꢋꢋꢃꢋꢋꢃꢑꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢀꢎꢚꢀꢅꢌꢎꢅꢃꢌꢆ$ꢀꢄꢈ$ꢀ#ꢃꢀ ꢏꢍꢐꢌꢃꢈꢋꢃꢑꢀ#$ꢀꢈꢍꢀ&ꢏꢍꢚꢉꢈꢆꢏꢎꢍꢀꢚꢈꢐꢆꢎꢌ&ꢀ'ꢉꢏꢄꢏꢆꢃꢑꢀꢆꢎꢀꢈꢀꢄꢈꢂꢏꢄꢊꢄꢀꢎꢚꢀ(!)ꢓꢀ*ꢏꢆꢙꢀꢚꢃ ꢀꢃꢂꢐꢃꢅꢆꢏꢎꢍꢋ"ꢀꢅꢌꢎꢅꢃꢌꢆ$ꢀꢏꢋꢀꢎꢍꢉ$ꢀꢌꢃꢈꢋꢋꢃꢋꢋꢃꢑꢀꢈꢋꢀꢈꢀꢌꢃꢋꢊꢉꢆꢀꢎꢚꢀꢍꢃ ꢀꢐꢎꢍꢋꢆꢌꢊꢐꢆꢏꢎꢍꢀꢈꢐꢆꢏꢇꢏꢆ$ꢀꢎꢌꢀꢈꢆꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢆꢏꢄꢃꢀꢏꢆꢀꢏꢋꢀꢋꢎꢉꢑꢀꢆꢎꢀꢈꢀꢍꢃ ꢀꢎ ꢍꢃꢌꢓꢀ+ꢆꢀꢆꢙꢈꢆꢀꢅꢎꢏꢍꢆ"ꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢅꢌꢎꢅꢃꢌꢆ$ꢀꢏꢋꢀꢌꢃꢈꢋꢋꢃꢋꢋꢃꢑꢀ #ꢈꢋꢃꢑꢀꢊꢅꢎꢍꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢈꢑꢑꢃꢑꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢀꢎꢚꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢐꢎꢍꢋꢆꢌꢊꢐꢆꢏꢎꢍꢀꢎꢌꢀꢈꢆꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢅꢊꢌꢐꢙꢈꢋꢃꢀꢅꢌꢏꢐꢃꢀ'ꢄꢈꢌ,ꢃꢆꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃ)ꢀꢎꢌꢀꢃꢐꢎꢍꢎꢄꢏꢐꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢀꢎꢚꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢅꢌꢎꢅꢃꢌꢆ$ꢀꢋꢎꢉꢑꢓꢀꢒꢙꢃꢀꢈꢋꢋꢃꢋꢋꢃꢑꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈꢆꢏꢎꢍꢀꢑꢈꢆꢈꢀꢋꢙꢎ ꢍꢀꢈ#ꢎꢇꢃꢀꢌꢃꢅꢌꢃꢋꢃꢍꢆꢋꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢎꢍꢉ$ꢀꢑꢈꢆꢈꢀꢐꢊꢌꢌꢃꢍꢆꢉ$ꢀꢈꢇꢈꢏꢉꢈ#ꢉꢃꢀ ꢏꢆꢙꢀꢌꢃꢋꢅꢃꢐꢆꢀꢆꢎꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀ ꢈꢐꢆꢊꢈꢉꢀꢄꢈꢌ,ꢃꢆꢀꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢀꢎꢚꢀꢆꢈꢂꢈ#ꢉꢃꢀꢅꢌꢎꢅꢃꢌꢆ$ꢀꢈꢍꢑꢀꢏꢋꢀꢋꢊ#-ꢃꢐꢆꢀꢆꢎꢀꢆꢙꢃꢀꢉꢏꢄꢏꢆꢈꢆꢏꢎꢍꢋꢀꢑꢃꢋꢐꢌꢏ#ꢃꢑꢀꢈ#ꢎꢇꢃꢓ ꢀꢁꢂꢆꢀ ꢀꢁꢂꢁꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢃꢋꢅꢌꢃꢍꢎꢏꢉꢐꢉꢌꢃꢑꢅꢆꢎꢂꢒꢃꢍꢌꢌꢉꢌꢌꢅꢇꢃ !"#$"%ꢃ&ꢃ ! '$ #ꢃꢑꢅꢚꢔꢖꢎꢉꢘꢃꢓꢁ(ꢃ)ꢅꢐꢐꢌꢃ ꢝꢌꢃꢅꢈꢌꢃꢑꢀ.ꢍꢀꢗ/ꢕꢘ/(0(1ꢀ2$ꢀ34ꢀꢀꢀꢀ ꢓꢕꢖꢌꢃꢇꢉꢗꢅꢇꢂꢃꢖꢌꢃꢎꢅꢂꢃꢂꢅꢃꢔꢉꢃꢆꢌꢉꢘꢃꢖꢎꢃꢌꢆꢗꢗꢅꢇꢂꢃꢅꢙꢃꢘꢉꢔꢂꢃꢖꢌꢌꢆꢁꢎꢈꢉꢃꢅꢇꢃꢈꢅꢎꢂꢖꢎꢆꢖꢎꢏꢃꢘꢖꢌꢈꢐꢅꢌꢆꢇꢉꢃꢌꢂꢁꢂꢉꢚꢉꢎꢂꢌꢃꢛꢖꢂꢕꢅꢆꢂꢃꢂꢕꢉꢃꢛꢇꢖꢂꢂꢉꢎꢃꢈꢅꢎꢌꢉꢎꢂꢃꢅꢙꢃꢜꢘꢋꢝꢃꢑꢅꢇꢉꢎꢃꢞꢃꢑꢅꢎꢉ

Page 196 ends

ꢋꢑꢈꢅꢉꢒꢋꢏꢅꢍꢓꢅꢇꢊꢔꢅꢕꢒꢐꢊꢇ
ꢀꢁꢀꢂꢃꢀꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢅꢉꢊꢋꢈꢌꢍꢎꢏꢅꢇꢆꢐꢐꢊꢎꢏ
ꢖꢊꢇꢒꢉꢅꢗꢎꢍꢗꢈꢎꢋꢏꢅꢘꢊꢙꢆꢈꢅꢋꢊꢖꢙꢈ
ꢉꢚꢛꢜꢝꢞ ! ꢗꢚ "ꢜ#$
ꢉꢂꢊꢅꢘ
ꢇꢄꢇ
ꢘꢊꢇ
ꢘ
ꢊ$$ꢜ$$ꢜ(ꢅꢘꢚ#'ꢜ ꢔꢜꢛꢅꢋꢚ%ꢚ&#ꢜꢅꢘꢚ#'ꢜ
ꢋꢌꢍꢎꢏꢌꢐꢑꢎꢒꢓ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢃꢄꢂꢅꢆꢆꢂꢇꢈꢉ ꢔꢆꢄꢕꢇꢖꢗ
ꢀꢈꢊꢅꢂꢇꢊꢆꢂꢅꢉꢆ ꢔꢘꢄꢕꢄꢖꢗ
ꢀꢇꢅꢉꢂꢈꢘꢘꢂꢃꢆꢁ ꢔꢁꢕꢇꢖꢗ
ꢀꢊꢉꢂꢃꢈꢃ ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢀꢊꢂꢉꢈꢊꢂꢆꢁꢈꢂꢆꢃꢄ ꢔꢆꢄꢕꢉꢖꢗ
ꢙꢚꢛꢛꢌꢜꢝꢎꢒꢓ ꢀꢈꢊꢄꢂꢇꢆꢅꢂꢉꢄꢘ ꢔꢘꢄꢕꢇꢖꢗ
ꢞꢐꢏ ꢍꢑꢜꢎꢒꢓ ꢀꢇꢅꢈꢂꢆꢉꢆꢂꢄꢁꢅ
ꢀꢊꢉꢂꢃꢈꢃ
ꢔꢁꢕꢊꢖꢗ
ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢔꢄꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢔꢃꢕꢘꢖꢗ
ꢔꢘꢕꢈꢖꢗ
ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢔꢄꢕꢘꢖꢗ
ꢔꢇꢕꢊꢖꢗ
!ꢚ"ꢑꢕ#$%ꢐꢌꢏ
ꢞꢐꢍꢑꢎꢑ ꢑꢎꢚꢐꢒꢓ
ꢞꢜꢜꢎ&ꢒꢑꢌꢏ
ꢇꢅ ꢀꢘꢆꢘꢂꢆꢘꢆꢂꢈꢄꢇ ꢔꢄꢕꢁꢖꢗ
ꢀꢘꢂꢉꢘꢈꢂꢅꢄꢃ ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢀꢁꢇꢃꢂꢃꢘꢇ ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢀꢘꢇꢅꢂꢈꢈꢈꢂꢉꢁꢇ
ꢀꢘꢂꢉꢘꢈꢂꢅꢄꢃ
ꢀꢁꢇꢃꢂꢃꢘꢇ
ꢘ
'ꢎꢍꢝꢌꢓꢓꢒꢐꢌꢚ ꢍ
ꢋꢌꢝꢜꢌꢒꢑꢎꢚꢐꢒꢓ
(ꢒꢝꢒꢐꢑ
ꢈ
ꢄꢘ ꢀꢉꢂꢁꢊꢅꢂꢄꢄꢈ ꢔꢃꢕꢘꢖꢗ
ꢀꢘꢄꢁꢂꢇꢇꢘꢂꢈꢃꢉ ꢔꢘꢕꢈꢖꢗ
ꢀꢄꢃꢂꢅꢁꢆꢂꢊꢇꢊ ꢔꢃꢕꢇꢖꢗ
ꢀꢆꢈꢂꢊꢃꢆ ꢔꢃꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢀꢉꢂꢁꢊꢅꢂꢄꢄꢈ
ꢀꢘꢄꢁꢂꢃꢁꢅꢂꢊꢃꢉ
ꢀꢃ
ꢆꢅꢘ
ꢄꢆꢘ
0ꢇ1
)*ꢌꢛ+ꢑ
,-)#.ꢚꢐ ꢐꢎꢑꢒꢜ/
ꢙꢜꢚꢍꢍ#ꢋꢌ2ꢌꢜꢌꢐꢝꢌ
3ꢐꢍꢌꢝ ꢜꢌꢏ
ꢋꢍꢋꢊꢙꢇ
ꢀꢆꢈꢂꢊꢃꢆ
0ꢆꢆꢘ1
0ꢘꢂꢃꢄꢘ1
))*ꢁꢀ+
ꢀꢘꢊꢘꢂꢄꢊꢁꢂꢉꢄꢊ ꢔꢄꢕꢃꢖꢗ
ꢀꢄꢄꢉꢂꢁꢘꢆꢂꢊꢁꢅ ꢔꢇꢕꢇꢖꢗ
,+*-)-*ꢄꢀ.*-//
ꢀꢘꢊꢘꢂꢄꢊꢁꢂꢉꢄꢊ
ꢀꢄꢄꢉꢂꢁꢃꢆꢂꢄꢘꢊ
,+*.ꢄꢁ*0/ꢂ*0ꢀ0
ꢊꢇꢇꢈꢇꢇꢈꢕꢅꢘꢊꢙꢆꢈ ꢔꢈꢋꢅꢋꢊ1ꢊꢖꢙꢈꢅꢘꢊꢙꢆꢈ
$ꢑ4ꢌꢜꢍ
ꢅꢕꢈꢖ
$ꢑ4ꢌꢜꢍ
ꢅꢕꢘꢖ
3ꢐꢍꢌꢝ ꢜꢌꢏ
ꢇꢕꢇꢖ
3ꢐꢍꢌꢝ ꢜꢌꢏ
ꢇꢕꢊꢖ
ꢞꢐꢏ ꢍꢑꢜꢎꢒꢓ
ꢁꢕꢇꢖ
ꢞꢐꢏ ꢍꢑꢜꢎꢒꢓ
ꢁꢕꢊꢖ
ꢙꢚꢛꢛꢌꢜꢝꢎꢒꢓ
ꢘꢄꢕꢄꢖ
ꢙꢚꢛꢛꢌꢜꢝꢎꢒꢓ
ꢘꢄꢕꢇꢖ
ꢋꢌꢍꢎꢏꢌꢐꢑꢎꢒꢓ
ꢆꢄꢕꢇꢖ
ꢋꢌꢍꢎꢏꢌꢐꢑꢎꢒꢓ
ꢆꢄꢕꢉꢖ
ꢀꢁꢂꢁꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢃꢋꢅꢌꢃꢍꢎꢏꢉꢐꢉꢌꢃꢑꢅꢆꢎꢂꢒꢃꢍꢌꢌꢉꢌꢌꢅꢇꢃ ! "# $ꢃꢑꢅꢓꢔꢕꢎꢉꢖꢃꢗꢁ%ꢃ&ꢅꢐꢐꢌꢃ 5ꢜꢌ+ꢒꢜꢌꢏ#$ꢐ#ꢆ6ꢘꢈ6ꢄꢃꢄꢊ#-/#'(#### ꢗꢘꢕꢌꢃꢇꢉꢙꢅꢇꢂꢃꢕꢌꢃꢎꢅꢂꢃꢂꢅꢃꢔꢉꢃꢆꢌꢉꢖꢃꢕꢎꢃꢌꢆꢙꢙꢅꢇꢂꢃꢅꢚꢃꢖꢉꢔꢂꢃꢕꢌꢌꢆꢁꢎꢈꢉꢃꢅꢇꢃꢈꢅꢎꢂꢕꢎꢆꢕꢎꢏꢃꢖꢕꢌꢈꢐꢅꢌꢆꢇꢉꢃꢌꢂꢁꢂꢉꢓꢉꢎꢂꢌꢃꢛꢕꢂꢘꢅꢆꢂꢃ ꢂꢘꢉꢃꢛꢇꢕꢂꢂꢉꢎꢃꢈꢅꢎꢌꢉꢎꢂꢃꢅꢚꢃꢜꢖꢋꢝꢃꢑꢅꢇꢉꢎꢃꢞꢃꢑꢅꢎꢉ ꢀꢁꢂꢇꢀ

Page 197 ends

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 198 ends

ꢄꢏꢃꢆꢐꢑꢄꢅꢆꢂꢒꢆꢓꢇꢎꢆꢉꢑꢔꢇꢓ
ꢀꢁꢂꢀꢃꢁꢄꢅꢆꢄꢇꢈꢆꢉꢂꢊꢊꢇꢁꢆꢋꢁꢃꢇꢌꢉꢂꢍꢎꢆ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢅꢞ ꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁꢗꢈꢏꢁ+ꢋꢕꢓꢛꢓꢏꢁꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ,1ꢆꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁ2ꢜꢘ!ꢊꢍꢌꢈꢋꢊꢛꢁ+ꢘꢕꢃꢁꢚꢘꢋꢜꢁ-.ꢒꢈꢘꢋꢜ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ,ꢞꢖꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁꢗꢈꢏꢁ+ꢋꢕꢓꢛꢓꢏꢁꢇꢈꢋꢏꢈꢛꢌꢜꢊꢍꢓꢜꢁꢚꢌꢔꢓꢁꢎꢌꢏꢍꢔꢌ!ꢍ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ, ꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁ%ꢈꢋꢌꢍꢊꢁ3ꢋꢌ&ꢌꢓꢜꢁꢉ!"ꢈꢈꢛꢁꢎꢌꢏꢍꢔꢌ!ꢍ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢂꢆꢞꢂꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁ2ꢜꢘ!ꢊꢍꢌꢈꢋꢊꢛꢁ4ꢓ#ꢃꢁ+ꢘꢕ.ꢓꢋꢍꢊꢍꢌꢈꢋꢁꢚꢘꢋꢜ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢂꢞ,ꢖꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁ)ꢊ5ꢁꢎꢌꢏꢍꢔꢌ!ꢍꢁ6ꢄ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢂ((,ꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁꢗꢌꢕ"ꢍꢁꢎꢌꢏꢍꢔꢌ!ꢍꢁ+
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢂꢅꢆꢄꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁꢝꢍꢃꢁꢉꢊꢋꢁ+ꢋꢍꢈꢋꢌꢈꢁꢇꢈ..ꢘꢋꢌꢍꢙꢁꢇꢈꢛꢛꢓꢕꢓ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢂꢅꢂꢅꢁꢁꢁꢁꢁꢗꢈꢏꢁ+ꢋꢕꢓꢛꢓꢏꢁꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙꢁꢗꢌ7ꢔꢊꢔꢙ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢄꢄꢅꢆ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢖꢅꢅ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢞ ꢅ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢞꢂꢆ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂ(ꢞꢖ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢅ,ꢄ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢄ ,
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢄꢅꢆ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢂꢆꢄ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢂꢅꢞ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢂꢂꢂꢄꢂ
ꢇꢈꢃꢁꢉꢊꢋꢌꢍꢊꢍꢌꢈꢋꢁꢎꢌꢏꢍꢃꢁꢐꢈꢃꢁꢅꢅꢁꢑꢒꢓꢔꢊꢍꢌꢋꢕ
ꢗꢊꢁꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙꢁꢚꢛꢈꢈꢜꢁꢇꢈꢋꢍꢔꢈꢛꢁꢝꢊꢌꢋꢍꢃ
ꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙꢁꢉ!"ꢈꢈꢛꢁꢉꢓꢔ#ꢌ!ꢓꢁꢚꢘꢋꢜ$ %ꢈꢋꢌꢍꢊ
ꢗꢊꢁꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙꢁꢚꢌꢔꢓꢁꢚ&'
)"ꢔꢓꢓꢁ*ꢊꢛꢛꢓꢙꢁꢝ'ꢜꢁꢑꢔꢌꢕꢌꢋꢊꢛꢁ+ꢔꢓꢊ
ꢇ"ꢌꢛꢜꢔꢓꢋꢏꢁ-ꢋꢏꢍꢌꢛꢃꢁ)ꢘꢌꢍꢌꢈꢋꢁꢚꢘꢋꢜ
ꢗꢊꢁꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙꢁꢚꢛꢈꢈꢜꢁꢎꢔꢃꢁ-.ꢒꢃꢁꢎꢌꢏꢍꢔꢌ!ꢍꢁꢝꢊꢌꢋꢍꢃ
ꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙꢁꢉ!"ꢈꢈꢛꢁꢉꢓꢔ#ꢌ!ꢓꢏ
ꢎꢓ#ꢓꢛꢈꢒꢃꢁꢇꢓꢋꢍꢓꢔꢁ/ꢊꢋꢜꢌ!ꢊꢒꢒꢓꢜꢁꢝꢌꢋꢈꢔ$ %ꢈꢋꢌꢍꢊ
ꢝꢍꢃꢁꢉꢊꢋꢁ+ꢋꢍꢈꢋꢌꢈꢁꢇ"ꢌꢛꢜꢔꢓꢋ0ꢏꢁꢇꢓꢋꢍꢓꢔꢁꢚꢘꢋꢜ
ꢗꢊꢁꢇꢈꢘꢋꢍꢙꢁ+!!ꢘ.ꢃꢁꢇꢊꢒꢃꢁꢑꢘꢍꢛꢊꢙ
ꢕꢆꢖꢗꢘꢘꢘꢘ
ꢇꢄꢑꢆꢙꢇꢚꢚꢛꢜꢝꢆꢄꢜꢞꢆꢑꢚ !"#"ꢚ$%ꢆꢁꢜ$&'(ꢆ)'!ꢆꢄꢜꢞꢆꢁꢜ$"ꢆꢇ!"ꢜꢆꢘ*ꢘ+,-ꢆꢃꢞ ꢝꢛ.&ꢚ/ꢆꢁ"."0"ꢝ'1#"ꢚ$ꢆꢒꢜ $'!(ꢆ2ꢆꢇ..&$&'ꢚꢜꢝꢆꢉ"3$ꢆꢓ"!0& " ꢚꢏꢉꢏꢄꢛꢈꢌꢅꢐꢆꢜꢄꢄꢖꢈꢃꢄꢝꢊꢑꢆꢒꢆꢃꢄꢘꢈꢌꢊꢉꢞꢄꢝꢃꢃꢆꢃꢃꢈꢅꢄ ! "# $ꢄꢝꢊꢊꢌꢏꢒꢄꢀꢏ%ꢄ&ꢊꢐꢅꢆꢓꢆꢊꢉꢄꢀꢏꢋꢒꢆꢃ 8ꢔꢓꢒꢊꢔꢓꢜꢁꢑꢋꢁꢆ9ꢄꢖ9ꢅꢂꢅ ꢁ%ꢙꢁꢝ*ꢁꢁꢁꢁ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢂꢃꢄꢊꢈꢉꢄꢉꢈꢄꢋꢆꢄꢌꢃꢆꢍꢄꢂꢊꢄꢃꢌꢇꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢍꢆꢋꢉꢄꢂꢃꢃꢌꢏꢊꢐꢆꢄꢈꢅꢄꢐꢈꢊꢉꢂꢊꢌꢂꢊꢑꢄꢍꢂꢃꢐꢒꢈꢃꢌꢅꢆꢄꢃꢉꢏꢉꢆꢓꢆꢊꢉꢃꢄꢔꢂꢉꢁꢈꢌꢉꢄꢉꢁꢆꢄꢔꢅꢂꢉꢉꢆꢊꢄꢐꢈꢊꢃꢆꢊꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢕꢍꢖꢗꢄꢘꢈꢅꢆꢊꢄꢙꢄꢘꢈꢊꢆ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢀ

Page 199 ends

ꢎꢏꢐꢅꢑꢒꢎꢍꢅꢇꢓꢅꢉꢌꢔꢅꢕꢒꢋꢌꢉ
ꢀꢁꢀꢂꢃꢀꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢈꢅꢉꢊꢋꢋꢌꢆꢍ
ꢎꢖꢗꢖꢘꢙꢚꢅꢛꢜꢝꢞꢚꢜ ! "ꢖꢙ#ꢚ$
ꢉꢚ%#ꢜꢚ&
ꢀꢈꢄꢂꢅꢃꢃ
ꢔꢝ'#'( ꢖꢜ!ꢅꢊ (ꢙ( (ꢚ$
ꢀꢁ
ꢊ'$ꢚ%#ꢜꢚ&
ꢘꢐꢎꢏꢖꢛꢗ ꢀꢈꢂꢄꢉꢈ
$%ꢌꢗ ꢀꢈꢊꢆ ꢀꢉ ꢀꢇꢄ
"ꢖꢙ#ꢚ$
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢆꢁꢂꢃꢇꢇ
ꢀꢁꢂꢈꢈꢃꢂꢉꢄꢄꢂꢊꢅꢋ
ꢀꢊꢁꢂꢁꢄꢅꢂꢈꢁꢅ
ꢀꢅꢋꢂꢊꢄꢅ ꢀꢄ
ꢀꢄ
"ꢐꢚ#
ꢀꢄ
ꢀꢄ
ꢞ ꢜꢎꢙ!ꢖ ꢖꢚꢒꢗ
ꢘꢖꢎꢗꢙꢚꢐꢛꢀꢘꢎꢙꢜꢖꢎꢒꢝ
ꢓꢍꢔꢒꢕꢎꢖꢗ
ꢀꢈꢃꢈꢂꢉꢆꢇꢂꢆꢄꢅ
ꢀꢅꢋꢂꢉꢉꢄꢂꢃꢊꢆ
ꢀꢄ
ꢀꢉꢂꢇꢅꢊꢂꢊꢅꢅ ꢄ
ꢌꢍꢎꢏꢎꢐꢑꢒ ꢄ ꢄ
ꢎꢝ ꢖꢙꢅ"ꢖꢙ#ꢚ )*+**,+-./+*/0 ).0+ꢄꢁ. )ꢀꢀ,+/-.+ꢄ/*
ꢐꢗꢚ1ꢞ (ꢝ'$
%ꢖꢐꢛꢀ)ꢗꢒꢐꢒꢖ ꢀꢃꢅꢂꢆꢁꢅꢂꢁꢅꢈ
ꢀꢇꢋꢂꢃꢁꢁ
ꢀꢄ
ꢀꢄ
ꢄ
ꢀꢄ
ꢀꢈꢄꢂꢉꢊꢉ
ꢀꢄ
ꢘꢖꢎꢗꢙꢚꢐꢛꢀꢘꢎꢙꢜꢖꢎꢒꢝ
ꢓꢍꢔꢒꢕꢎꢖꢗ ꢀꢈꢂꢇꢊꢋ
ꢌꢍꢎꢏꢎꢐꢑꢒ ꢄ
ꢀꢁꢋꢂꢉꢃꢋꢂꢇꢊꢁ
)/0+ꢁꢁ.+//ꢀ
ꢄ ꢀꢄ
&ꢙ ꢖꢙ'ꢚꢖꢎꢗ(
ꢎꢝ ꢖꢙꢅꢐꢗꢚ1ꢞ (ꢝ'$2
ꢄ ꢀꢄ
)ꢁ )-ꢁ+ꢀꢄꢀ
ꢎꢝ ꢖꢙꢅꢔꢚ "ꢖꢙ#ꢚ )*+*--+-*0+-ꢁ* ).0+ꢄꢁ. )ꢀꢀ,+/ꢁ.+ꢀ-ꢄ
ꢑꢝ1ꢘ('ꢚ& "ꢖꢙ#ꢚ$ ꢎꢝ ꢖꢙ
ꢎꢝ ꢖꢙꢅ"ꢖꢙ#ꢚ$ )*+0,0+..-+/ꢀ-
ꢎꢝ ꢖꢙꢅꢐꢗꢚ1ꢞ (ꢝ'$ )/0+ꢁ-.+.,ꢄ
ꢔꢚ ꢅꢎꢝ ꢖꢙꢅ"ꢖꢙ#ꢚ$ )*+0ꢄꢁ+./ꢂ+.ꢀ.
ꢀ ꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢆꢇꢂꢈꢄꢂꢉꢊꢄꢋꢆꢌꢍꢄꢈꢎꢃꢏꢂꢊꢐꢆꢑꢋꢄꢆꢊꢂꢃꢆꢏꢊꢒꢓꢔꢕꢄꢕꢆꢏꢊꢆꢖꢂꢃꢑꢓꢆꢌꢍꢄꢈꢎꢃꢏꢂꢊꢐ ꢚꢏꢉꢏꢄꢛꢈꢌꢅꢐꢆꢜꢄꢄꢖꢈꢃꢄꢝꢊꢑꢆꢒꢆꢃꢄꢘꢈꢌꢊꢉꢞꢄꢝꢃꢃꢆꢃꢃꢈꢅꢄ ! "# $ꢄꢘꢈꢓꢋꢂꢊꢆꢍꢄꢀꢏ%ꢄ&ꢈꢒꢒꢃꢄ ꢘꢎꢖꢜꢐꢎꢖ#ꢀ*ꢚꢀꢅ+ꢈꢋ+ꢉꢄꢉꢊꢀ,ꢝꢀ-.ꢀꢀꢀꢀ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢂꢃꢄꢊꢈꢉꢄꢉꢈꢄꢋꢆꢄꢌꢃꢆꢍꢄꢂꢊꢄꢃꢌꢇꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢍꢆꢋꢉꢄꢂꢃꢃꢌꢏꢊꢐꢆꢄꢈꢅꢄꢐꢈꢊꢉꢂꢊꢌꢂꢊꢑꢄꢍꢂꢃꢐꢒꢈꢃꢌꢅꢆꢄꢃꢉꢏꢉꢆꢓꢆꢊꢉꢃꢄꢔꢂꢉꢁꢈꢌꢉꢄꢉꢁꢆꢄꢔꢅꢂꢉꢉꢆꢊꢄ ꢐꢈꢊꢃꢆꢊꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢕꢍꢖꢗꢄꢘꢈꢅꢆꢊꢄꢙꢄꢘꢈꢊꢆ
ꢀꢁꢄꢅꢀ Page 200 – 2053
ꢂꢌꢁꢃꢑꢍꢂꢐꢃꢎꢒꢃꢈꢄꢀꢃꢉꢍꢓꢄꢈ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢂꢄꢅꢄꢆꢇꢁꢃꢄꢈꢈꢁꢈꢈꢁꢉꢃꢊꢄꢇꢋꢁꢃꢌꢍꢈꢂꢎꢏꢐ
ꢔꢕꢖꢗꢘꢖꢙꢃꢚꢃꢔꢕꢔꢛꢘꢔꢗ ꢂꢜꢝꢜꢞ ! "#$%!#&'ꢃꢊꢜ (!)
ꢇ*!+ꢃꢐ!ꢜ# ꢈ!,(#!- ꢋ+)!,(#!- ꢈꢆꢁꢃꢀ$+(+*&ꢜ#' ꢀ!&ꢃꢂ$&ꢜ ꢃꢄꢊ .ꢃꢑ/ꢜ+0! ꢔꢕꢖꢗꢘꢖꢙ
ꢔꢕꢖꢙꢘꢖ2
ꢔꢕꢖ2ꢘꢖ4
ꢔꢕꢖ4ꢘꢖ3
ꢔꢕꢖ3ꢘꢖ6
ꢔꢕꢖ6ꢘꢔꢕ
ꢔꢕꢔꢕꢘꢔꢖ
ꢔꢕꢔꢖꢘꢔꢔ
ꢔꢕꢔꢔꢘꢔꢛ
ꢔꢕꢔꢛꢘꢔꢗ
ꢁꢉꢄꢅꢅꢆꢄꢅꢇꢂꢄꢅꢋꢅ
ꢁꢉꢄꢃꢈꢃꢄꢊꢇꢂꢄꢋꢅꢃ
ꢁꢉꢄꢌꢂꢌꢄꢉꢋꢅꢄꢇꢂꢂ
ꢁꢃꢄꢋꢇꢈꢄꢆꢂꢆꢄꢈꢂꢆ
ꢁꢃꢄꢊꢃꢆꢄꢋꢆꢅꢄꢌꢆꢅ
ꢁꢃꢄꢉꢇꢅꢄꢌꢋꢌꢄꢅꢇꢋ
ꢁꢃꢄꢆꢌꢆꢄꢌꢊꢃꢄꢉꢅꢆ
ꢁꢃꢄꢈꢂꢌꢄꢉꢇꢉꢄꢇꢃꢋ
ꢁꢆꢄꢊꢌꢌꢄꢅꢌꢆꢄꢅꢅꢇ
ꢁꢆꢄꢆꢇꢇꢄꢇꢆꢈꢄꢇꢋꢆ
ꢁꢇꢈꢉꢄꢊꢈꢅꢄꢊꢋꢂ
ꢁꢊꢋꢋꢄꢊꢊꢂꢄꢊꢃꢉ
ꢁꢊꢊꢊꢄꢅꢆꢇꢄꢇꢉꢅ
ꢁꢇꢂꢈꢄꢇꢇꢌꢄꢋꢉꢌ
ꢁꢇꢂꢃꢄꢂꢇꢆꢄꢂꢇꢃ
ꢁꢇꢂꢌꢄꢂꢊꢉꢄꢅꢃꢋ
ꢁꢇꢂꢇꢄꢇꢂꢉꢄꢉꢅꢇ
ꢁꢊꢋꢆꢄꢌꢇꢃꢄꢆꢅꢋ
ꢁꢊꢅꢂꢄꢉꢊꢃꢄꢊꢋꢉ
ꢁꢊꢊꢂꢄꢃꢋꢌꢄꢊꢇꢉ
ꢁꢂꢃꢂꢄꢅꢆꢅ
ꢁꢂꢃꢂꢄꢅꢆꢅ
ꢁꢅꢇꢈꢄꢂꢈꢆ
ꢁꢅꢇꢈꢄꢂꢈꢆ
ꢁꢅꢇꢈꢄꢂꢈꢆ
ꢁꢅꢇꢈꢄꢂꢈꢆ
ꢁꢃꢌꢊꢄꢅꢆꢂ
ꢁꢌꢈꢄꢉꢋꢌ
ꢃꢗ1ꢙꢔꢖ1ꢙ2ꢖ134ꢙ
ꢃꢗ14321ꢗꢕ412ꢙꢔ
ꢃꢙ1ꢕꢔꢕ1ꢕ3ꢛ1ꢛꢔ3
ꢃꢙ1ꢔꢖ41ꢖꢛꢔ16ꢔ6
ꢃꢙ1ꢗꢙꢔ1ꢔ66122ꢗ
ꢃꢙ12ꢖꢖ16ꢙꢕ12ꢗ2
ꢃꢙ13231ꢗ6ꢔ1ꢔꢛ2
ꢃ21ꢖꢕꢗ1ꢔꢕ31ꢖ34
ꢃ21ꢙꢖ2134616ꢗꢔ
ꢃ213ꢗꢕ14ꢙꢛ14ꢔ4
ꢃꢙ532.
ꢃꢗ533.
ꢃꢛ56ꢛ.
ꢃꢗ5ꢙꢖ.
ꢃꢔ56ꢛ.
ꢃꢗ5ꢙ4.
ꢃꢗ5ꢕꢔ.
ꢃ2542.
ꢃꢗ564.
ꢁꢌꢈꢄꢉꢋꢌ
ꢁꢌꢈꢄꢉꢋꢌ
ꢄ++(ꢜ ꢃ7#$8&/ꢃꢏꢜ&!ꢃ. ꢃꢗ54ꢖ.
ꢎꢏꢐꢀꢑꢒꢓꢔꢓꢕꢖꢗꢘꢙ ꢚꢓꢛꢜꢝꢔꢘꢜꢞ ꢎꢜꢝꢔꢘꢜꢞ
ꢁꢌꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋ
ꢁꢆꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋ
ꢁꢃꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋ
ꢁꢉꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋ
ꢁꢅꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋ
ꢁꢊꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋ
ꢁꢇꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋꢄꢋꢋꢋ
ꢁꢋ
ꢑꢜꢖꢀ!"ꢀꢝ#ꢗꢓ$ꢜꢛꢀ%ꢜꢛꢛꢀꢖ#ꢗꢓꢀꢖ&ꢒꢀ'ꢜꢘꢝꢜꢓꢖꢀꢗꢘꢜꢀꢕꢓꢀ'ꢔꢘ'%ꢜꢀ(ꢒꢓꢖ)ꢀꢑꢜ$ꢗꢖꢕ*ꢜꢀꢑꢜꢖꢀ!"ꢀ'ꢜꢘꢝꢜꢓꢖꢀꢝ#ꢗꢓ$ꢜꢛꢀꢗꢘꢜꢀꢕꢓꢀꢘꢜꢞ) !ꢓꢓꢔꢗ%ꢀ+ꢘꢒ&ꢖ#ꢀ,ꢗꢖꢜꢀ-.!+,/ꢀꢕꢛꢀꢝꢗ%ꢝꢔ%ꢗꢖꢜꢞꢀꢗꢛꢀꢖ#ꢜꢀ0ꢜꢗꢓꢀꢗꢓꢓꢔꢗ%ꢕ1ꢜꢞꢀ$ꢘꢒ&ꢖ#ꢀꢘꢗꢖꢜꢀ(ꢒꢘꢀꢝꢒ0'ꢒꢔꢓꢞꢕꢓ$ꢀ*ꢗ%ꢔꢜꢛꢀꢒ*ꢜꢘꢀꢗꢀ$ꢕ*ꢜꢓꢀꢖꢕ0ꢜꢀ'ꢜꢘꢕꢒꢞ) ꢚꢏꢉꢏꢄꢛꢈꢌꢅꢐꢆꢜꢄꢄꢖꢈꢃꢄꢝꢊꢑꢆꢒꢆꢃꢄꢘꢈꢌꢊꢉꢞꢄꢝꢃꢃꢆꢃꢃꢈꢅꢄ !ꢄ"ꢄ# #$!#%ꢄꢘꢈꢓꢋꢂꢊꢆꢍꢄꢀꢏ&ꢄ'ꢈꢒꢒꢃꢄ 2ꢘꢜ'ꢗꢘꢜꢞꢀ3ꢓꢀꢌꢍꢇꢈꢍꢊꢋꢊꢉꢀꢏꢙꢀ4"ꢀꢀꢀꢀ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢂꢃꢄꢊꢈꢉꢄꢉꢈꢄꢋꢆꢄꢌꢃꢆꢍꢄꢂꢊꢄꢃꢌꢇꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢍꢆꢋꢉꢄꢂꢃꢃꢌꢏꢊꢐꢆꢄꢈꢅꢄꢐꢈꢊꢉꢂꢊꢌꢂꢊꢑꢄꢍꢂꢃꢐꢒꢈꢃꢌꢅꢆꢄꢃꢉꢏꢉꢆꢓꢆꢊꢉꢃꢄꢔꢂꢉꢁꢈꢌꢉꢄꢉꢁꢆꢄꢔꢅꢂꢉꢉꢆꢊꢄꢐꢈꢊꢃꢆꢊꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢕꢍꢖꢗꢄꢘꢈꢅꢆꢊꢄꢙꢄꢘꢈꢊꢆ ꢀꢁꢄꢁꢀ

Page 201 ends

City of San Dimas
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Governmental Activities
Fiscal Year Lease Revenue Bonds Housing Revenue Bonds Improvement Bonds Capital Leases Subscriptions Leases 2015
Total Primary Government Percentage of Personal Income Per Capita $ 6,030,000
5,515,000
4,985,000
4,435,000
3,870,000
2,654,000
2,006,000
1,349,000
680,000
-
$ 5,430,000
5,165,000
4,885,000
4,590,000
4,280,000
3,950,000
2,318,400
1,878,300
1,420,900
956,200
$ 16,097 $ - $ - $ 11,476,097
10,687,830
9,911,051
9,056,546
8,171,553
6,615,046
4,324,400
3,267,895
2,445,181
1,210,812

0.007

0.006

0.005

0.004

0.003

0.002

0.001
328.60
306.03
283.79
259.32
233.98
189.41
123.82

93.57 2016 7,830 - -
2017 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
41,051
31,546
21,553
11,046
-
-
2018 -
2019 -
2020 -
2021 -
2022 40,595 -
24,030
7,320
2023 320,251
247,292

70.01 2024 33.37
Source: City of San Dimas Finance Department
-132- Page 202 – 2053
City of San Dimas
Legal Debt Margin Information
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year
2015 2016 2017
$5,020,086,328
25%
2018
$5,452,299,664
25%
2019
$5,611,950,646
25%
Assessed valuation
Conversion Factor
$4,786,407,652 $5,217,132,929
25% 25%
Adjusted Assessed Valuation
Legal debt limit percentage
1,196,601,913
15%
1,255,021,582
15%
1,304,283,232
15%
1,363,074,916
15%
1,402,987,662
15%
Debt limit 179,490,287 188,253,237
-
195,642,485
-
204,461,237
-
210,448,149
-
Total net debt applicable to limit:

General obligation bonds -
Legal debt margin $ 179,490,287 $ 188,253,237 $ 195,642,485 $ 204,461,237 $ 210,448,149 Total debt applicable to the limit
as a percentage of debt limit 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Note: The Government Code of the State of California provides for a legal debt limit of 15% of gross assessed valuation. However, this provision was enacted when assessed valuation was based upon 25% of market value. Effective with fiscal year 1981-82, each parcel is now assessed at 100% of market value. Although the statutory debt limit has not been amended by the State since this change, the calculations presented above include a conversion factor of 25% to the assessed valuation to account for the change in the basis on which the legal debt limit is based.

Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -133- Page 203 – 2053
City of San Dimas
Legal Debt Margin Information
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year
2020 2022
$5,868,492,236
25%
2021
$6,104,208,187
25%
2023
$6,516,879,942
25%
2024
$6,840,753,727
25%
$6,104,208,187
25%
1,467,123,059
15%
1,526,052,047
15%
1,526,052,047
15%
1,629,219,986
15%
1,710,188,432
15%
220,068,459
-
228,907,807
-
228,907,807
-
244,382,998
-
256,528,265
-
$ 220,068,459 $ 228,907,807 $ 228,907,807 $ 244,382,998 $ 256,528,265

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
-134- Page 204 – 2053
City of San Dimas
Direct and Overlapping General Fund Debt
As of June 30, 2024
2023-24 Assessed Valuation: $6,840,753,727
Total Debt
6/30/24
City’s Share of
OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT: % Applicable (1) Debt 6/30/24 Metropolitan Water District
Citrus Community College District
Mount San Antonio Community College District
Bonita Unified School District
Charter Oak Unified School District
$18,210,000
115,880,302
867,726,492
107,349,790
56,980,000
176,918,392
31,665,437

0.175%

0.426

5.729

47.290

8.344

2.533
$ 31,868
493,650
49,712,051
50,765,716
4,754,411
4,481,343
668,774
Covina-Valley Unified School District
Glendora Unified School District 2.112
TOTAL OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT $110,907,813
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT:

Los Angeles County General Fund Obligations
Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools Certificates of Participation Bonita Unified School District Certificates of Participation Charter Oak Unified School District Certificates of Participation Revenue Bonds
Lease Payable
Subscription Payable
City of San Dimas General Fund Obligations

TOTAL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT
$2,479,229,730
2,857,300
8,724,000
585,000
956,200
7,320

0.341%

0.341

47.290

8.344
$ 8,454,173
9,743
4,125,580
48,812
100 956,200
7,320
247,292
0 100
100
100
247,292
0 $13,849,120
TOTAL DIRECT DEBT $0
TOTAL OVERLAPPING DEBT $124,756,933
COMBINED TOTAL DEBT $124,756,120 (2)
(1) The percentage of overlapping debt applicable to the city is estimated using taxable assessed property value. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the overlapping district's assessed value that is within the boundaries of the city divided by the district's total taxable assessed value.
(2) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, enterprise revenue, mortgage revenue, non-bonded capital lease obligations, and sales tax revenue bonds.

Ratios to 2023-24 Assessed Valuation:

Direct Debt ($0) .................................................................................... 0.00% Total Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt....................... 1.62% Combined Total Debt ............................................................................. 1.82% KD:($550)
-135- Page 205 – 2053
City of San Dimas
Full-time City Employees by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Full-Time Employees as of June 30
Function 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
City Council 5
2 5
2 5
2 5
2 5
City manager's office 2
Administrative services
Community Development Services
Public Works
10 14
17 23
1 10
13 16
22 1
10 12
16 22
1 10
13 16
22 1
10 13
16 23
3 Parks & Recreation
Housing
Total 72 69 68 69 72
Source: Financial Services Department, City of San Dimas -136- Page 206 – 2053
City of San Dimas
Full-time City Employees by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Full-Time Employees as of June 30
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
5 2
5 2
5 2
5 2
5 5
9 11
15 17
20 3
11 15
17 20
3 11
15 17
20 3
10 14
17 22
4 16
16 21
3 72 73 73 73 77
-137- Page 207 – 2053
ꢉꢇꢃꢄꢍꢈꢉꢌꢄꢊꢎꢄꢀꢁꢏꢄꢐꢈꢑꢁꢀ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢀꢄꢅꢁꢂꢆꢃꢄꢇꢈꢀꢉꢊꢋꢌ
ꢀꢒꢓꢔꢕꢖꢄꢎꢗꢘꢒꢕꢙꢄꢋꢖꢚꢒꢛꢖꢓꢜꢒꢗꢕꢄꢎꢝꢕꢕꢄꢅꢗꢕꢝꢖꢄꢀꢗꢕꢖꢚꢄꢞ !ꢞ !"ꢞ""ꢄ#ꢄ$!%ꢞ!"ꢞ"&' ꢌꢖꢗ) ꢎꢝꢕꢕꢄꢅꢗꢕꢝꢖꢄꢀꢗꢕꢖꢚ ꢁ+ꢖ)ꢗꢔꢖꢄ()ꢒ*ꢖ ꢑꢖꢛꢒꢗꢓꢄ()ꢒ*ꢖ ꢑꢖꢛꢒꢗꢓꢄ,ꢄꢍ-ꢗꢓꢔꢖ ꢉꢆꢉꢉ
ꢉꢆꢉꢁ
ꢉꢆꢉꢌ
ꢀꢁꢂꢂ
ꢀꢉꢁꢆ
ꢀꢂꢁꢎ
ꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢁꢈꢅ
ꢃꢊꢂꢁꢇꢂꢊꢂ
ꢃꢄꢊꢌꢇꢌꢌꢂ
ꢃꢄꢉꢉꢇꢆꢆꢆ
ꢃꢄꢌꢂꢇꢉꢎꢆ
ꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢆꢆꢆ
ꢀꢉꢋꢁꢌꢍ
ꢀꢉꢋꢉꢁꢍ
ꢑꢖꢛꢒꢗꢓꢄ()ꢒ*ꢖ ꢁ+ꢔꢄ()ꢒ*ꢖ
ꢃꢂꢇꢆꢆꢆꢇꢆꢆꢆ
ꢃꢄꢆꢆꢇꢆꢆꢆ
ꢃꢅꢆꢆꢇꢆꢆꢆ
ꢃꢌꢆꢆꢇꢆꢆꢆ
ꢃꢉꢆꢆꢇꢆꢆꢆ
ꢃꢆ
ꢌꢖꢗ)
ꢏꢀꢐꢑꢒꢓꢔꢕꢖꢗꢘꢙꢒꢀꢓꢗꢖꢚꢛꢜꢙꢗꢛꢇꢀꢝꢑꢔꢓꢘꢒꢖꢔꢞꢀ ꢙꢙ ꢛꢇꢀꢓꢗꢑꢛꢓꢀꢓꢗꢖꢚꢛꢜꢙꢗꢛꢇꢀꢓꢔꢞꢙꢛ!ꢖꢗꢙꢛꢇꢀꢖꢚ ꢀꢕꢖꢗꢓꢔꢖꢒꢀꢛꢖꢒꢙꢛꢀꢖꢗꢙꢀꢙ"ꢘꢒꢑ ꢙ ꢀꢜꢗ#ꢞꢀꢓ!ꢔꢛꢀꢖꢚꢖꢒ$ꢛꢔꢛꢋ ꢚꢏꢉꢏꢄꢛꢈꢌꢅꢐꢆꢜꢄꢄꢖꢈꢃꢄꢝꢊꢑꢆꢒꢆꢃꢄꢘꢈꢌꢊꢉꢞꢄ ꢆꢐꢈꢅꢍꢆꢅꢄꢄ %ꢗꢙꢕꢖꢗꢙ ꢀ&ꢚꢀꢈ'ꢂꢄ'ꢉꢆꢉꢌꢀ($ꢀꢐ)ꢀꢀꢀꢀ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢂꢃꢄꢊꢈꢉꢄꢉꢈꢄꢋꢆꢄꢌꢃꢆꢍꢄꢂꢊꢄꢃꢌꢇꢇꢈꢅꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢍꢆꢋꢉꢄꢂꢃꢃꢌꢏꢊꢐꢆꢄꢈꢅꢄꢐꢈꢊꢉꢂꢊꢌꢂꢊꢑꢄꢍꢂꢃꢐꢒꢈꢃꢌꢅꢆꢄꢃꢉꢏꢉꢆꢓꢆꢊꢉꢃꢄꢔꢂꢉꢁꢈꢌꢉꢄꢉꢁꢆꢄꢔꢅꢂꢉꢉꢆꢊꢄ ꢐꢈꢊꢃꢆꢊꢉꢄꢈꢎꢄꢕꢍꢖꢗꢄꢘꢈꢅꢆꢊꢄꢙꢄꢘꢈꢊꢆ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢀ

Page 208 ends

ꢎꢈꢁꢋꢊꢉꢎꢏꢋꢃꢐꢋꢍꢆꢌꢋꢀꢉꢂꢆꢍ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢋꢆꢌꢀꢋꢁꢊꢃꢌꢃꢂꢉꢊꢋꢍꢎꢆꢎꢉꢍꢎꢉꢊꢍꢋ
ꢊꢔ#ꢑꢕꢒꢔ$ꢋ
ꢏꢑꢔ$
ꢇꢑ$'ꢘꢕꢔ#ꢋꢉꢕ"ꢘ(ꢑꢋ
)ꢉꢕꢋꢎ!ꢘ*'ꢔꢕꢒ'+
ꢇꢑ$ꢋꢊꢔꢚꢓ ꢔꢋ
ꢇꢑ$'ꢘꢕꢔ#ꢋꢉꢕ"ꢘ(ꢑ
,ꢕꢑ(ꢚ#ꢘ-(ꢑꢕ
ꢅꢔ ꢑ
ꢗꢋꢘꢙꢋꢋꢇꢘꢚꢋꢛꢜꢝꢋꢞꢓ !ꢋ
ꢈꢓꢖ!ꢋꢍ"!ꢘꢘ#ꢋꢀꢑꢖ$ꢑꢑ
ꢗꢋꢘꢙꢋꢋꢇꢘꢚꢋꢛꢜꢝꢋꢞꢓ !ꢋ
ꢇꢘꢚ*#ꢔ ꢓꢘꢕ ꢂꢑꢒꢓꢔꢕꢋꢆꢖꢑ %ꢔ"!ꢑ#ꢘ$&'ꢋꢀꢑꢖ$ꢑꢑꢋꢋ
ꢂꢌꢈꢁ
ꢂꢌꢈꢋ
ꢂꢌꢈꢍ
ꢂꢌꢈꢎ
ꢂꢌꢈꢊ
ꢂꢌꢈꢄ
ꢂꢌꢂꢌ
ꢂꢌꢂꢈ
ꢂꢌꢂꢂ
ꢂꢌꢂꢅ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢌꢊꢍ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢈꢁꢁ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢂꢅꢈ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢋꢌꢎ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢋꢊꢁ
ꢀꢅꢅꢉꢄꢁꢋ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢌꢌꢅ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢅꢋꢂ
ꢀꢅꢁꢉꢌꢎꢄ
ꢀꢅꢅꢉꢄꢂꢌ
ꢇꢈꢉꢈꢊꢅꢉꢈꢋꢄ
ꢇꢈꢉꢈꢄꢊꢉꢌꢍꢂ
ꢇꢈꢉꢂꢈꢎꢉꢁꢊꢋ
ꢇꢈꢉꢂꢈꢄꢉꢊꢍꢊ
ꢇꢈꢉꢂꢈꢎꢉꢅꢄꢅ
ꢇꢈꢉꢂꢍꢅꢉꢁꢅꢁ
ꢇꢈꢉꢂꢍꢋꢉꢄꢍꢄ
ꢇꢈꢉꢅꢂꢌꢉꢎꢋꢈ
ꢇꢈꢉꢁꢁꢄꢉꢌꢍꢂ
ꢇꢈꢉꢍꢌꢋꢉꢂꢈꢋ
ꢇꢅꢁꢉꢎꢈꢈ
ꢇꢅꢋꢉꢌꢊꢊ
ꢇꢅꢋꢉꢋꢍꢍ
ꢇꢅꢋꢉꢅꢋꢈ
ꢇꢅꢋꢉꢂꢌꢈ
ꢇꢅꢎꢉꢂꢂꢌ
ꢇꢅꢎꢉꢂꢅꢈ
ꢇꢅꢊꢉꢁꢁꢎ
ꢇꢁꢂꢉꢋꢂꢌ
ꢇꢁꢎꢉꢅꢂꢅ
ꢀꢍꢃꢋꢆ
ꢀꢋꢃꢅꢆ
ꢀꢁꢃꢈꢆ
ꢀꢅꢃꢍꢆ
ꢀꢁꢃꢂꢆ
ꢀꢁꢃꢈꢆ
ꢀꢈꢌꢃꢍꢆ
ꢀꢎꢃꢁꢆ
ꢀꢁꢃꢁꢆ
ꢀꢁꢃꢈꢆ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢂ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢅ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢋ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢈ
ꢀꢁꢈꢃꢎ
ꢀꢁꢈꢃꢎ
ꢀꢁꢈꢃꢅ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢋ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢍ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢎ
ꢀꢄꢂꢃꢅꢆ
ꢀꢄꢂꢃꢎꢆ
ꢀꢄꢂꢃꢈꢆ
ꢀꢄꢂꢃꢋꢆ
ꢀꢄꢂꢃꢄꢆ
ꢀꢄꢅꢃꢌꢆ
ꢀꢄꢅꢃꢁꢆ
ꢀꢄꢅꢃꢊꢆ
ꢀꢄꢁꢃꢂꢆ
ꢀꢄꢅꢃꢍꢆ
ꢀꢅꢁꢃꢁꢆ
ꢀꢅꢋꢃꢊꢆ
ꢀꢅꢋꢃꢎꢆ
ꢀꢅꢍꢃꢋꢆ
ꢀꢅꢎꢃꢂꢆ
ꢀꢅꢎꢃꢌꢆ
ꢀꢅꢍꢃꢄꢆ
ꢀꢅꢊꢃꢈꢆ
ꢀꢅꢎꢃꢋꢆ
ꢀꢅꢊꢃꢌꢆ
ꢇꢑ$'ꢘꢕꢔ#ꢋꢉꢕ"ꢘ(ꢑꢋꢔꢕꢒꢋ,ꢕꢑ(ꢚ#ꢘ-(ꢑꢕ ꢁꢒ*"ꢔ ꢓꢘꢕꢋ.ꢑ/ꢑ#ꢋꢆ ꢔꢓꢕꢑꢒꢋꢙꢘ$ꢋꢇꢘꢚ*#ꢔ ꢓꢘꢕꢋꢛꢜ ꢔꢕꢒꢋꢃ/ꢑ$
ꢁꢊꢉꢌꢌꢌ ꢈꢂ
ꢈꢌ
ꢊ
ꢂꢊꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢁꢍꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢁꢁꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢁꢂꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢁꢌꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢅꢊꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢅꢍꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢅꢁꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢂꢁꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢂꢌꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢈꢍꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢈꢂꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢊꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢍ
ꢁ
ꢂ
ꢁꢉꢌꢌꢌ
ꢌ ꢌ
ꢂꢌꢈꢁ ꢂꢌꢈꢋ ꢂꢌꢈꢍ ꢂꢌꢈꢎ ꢂꢌꢈꢊ ꢂꢌꢈꢄ ꢂꢌꢂꢌ ꢂꢌꢂꢈ ꢂꢌꢂꢂ ꢂꢌꢂꢅ ꢂꢌꢈꢁ ꢂꢌꢈꢋ ꢂꢌꢈꢍ ꢂꢌꢈꢎ ꢂꢌꢈꢊ ꢂꢌꢈꢄ ꢂꢌꢂꢌ ꢂꢌꢂꢈ ꢂꢌꢂꢂ ꢂꢌꢂꢅ ꢏꢐꢑꢀꢒꢓꢔꢕꢖꢓꢀꢏꢐꢑꢗꢀꢘꢙꢚꢛꢜꢐ ꢝꢙꢐꢜꢔꢞꢛ ꢜꢐꢙꢖꢀ!ꢓꢖꢐ "ꢐꢗꢗꢀ#$ꢓꢙꢀ%ꢕ&$ 'ꢚ$ꢛꢛꢞ %ꢕ&$ 'ꢚ$ꢛꢛꢞꢀ(ꢑꢓ)*ꢓꢖꢐ ꢒꢛꢞꢞꢐ&ꢐꢀ(ꢑꢓ)*ꢓꢖꢐ ꢌꢘ ꢑ'ꢋꢔꢕꢒꢋꢀꢔ ꢔꢋꢍꢘ*$"ꢑ'0
ꢏꢛꢔ*ꢞꢓꢖꢕꢛꢙ+ꢀꢒꢓꢞꢕ,ꢛꢑꢙꢕꢓꢀ'ꢖꢓꢖꢐꢀ-ꢐꢔꢓꢑꢖꢜꢐꢙꢖꢀꢛ,ꢀ.ꢕꢙꢓꢙꢚꢐꢃꢀꢀꢝꢙꢐꢜꢔꢞꢛ ꢜꢐꢙꢖꢀ-ꢓꢖꢓ+ꢀꢒꢓꢞꢕ,ꢛꢑꢙꢕꢓꢀ/ꢜꢔꢞꢛ ꢜꢐꢙꢖꢀ-ꢐ0ꢐꢞꢛꢔꢜꢐꢙꢖꢀ-ꢐꢔꢓꢑꢖꢜꢐꢙꢖ ꢂꢌꢌꢌ1ꢂꢌꢌꢄꢀꢘꢙꢚꢛꢜꢐꢉꢀ2&ꢐꢉꢀꢓꢙ)ꢀ/)*ꢚꢓꢖꢕꢛꢙꢀ-ꢓꢖꢓ+ꢀꢀ/'!ꢘꢀ1ꢀꢀꢏꢑꢛ3ꢐꢚꢖꢕꢛꢙꢗꢀꢓꢑꢐꢀ)ꢐ0ꢐꢞꢛꢔꢐ)ꢀ4 ꢀꢕꢙꢚꢛꢑꢔꢛꢑꢓꢖꢕꢙ&ꢀꢓꢞꢞꢀꢛ,ꢀꢖ$ꢐꢀꢔꢑꢕꢛꢑꢀꢚꢐꢙꢗ*ꢗꢀ)ꢓꢖꢓꢀꢑꢐꢞꢐꢓꢗꢐ)ꢀꢖꢛꢀ )ꢓꢖꢐꢃꢀꢀ-ꢐꢜꢛ&ꢑꢓꢔ$ꢕꢚꢀ-ꢓꢖꢓꢀꢕꢗꢀꢖꢛꢖꢓꢞꢐ)ꢀ,ꢑꢛꢜꢀꢒꢐꢙꢗ*ꢗꢀ5ꢞꢛꢚ6ꢀ(ꢑꢛ*ꢔꢗꢀꢖ$ꢓꢖꢀꢛ0ꢐꢑꢞꢓꢔꢀꢖ$ꢐꢀꢒꢕꢖ ꢂꢌꢈꢌꢀꢓꢙ)ꢀꢞꢓꢖꢐꢑꢀ1ꢀꢘꢙꢚꢛꢜꢐꢉꢀ2&ꢐꢀꢓꢙ)ꢀ/)*ꢚꢓꢖꢕꢛꢙꢀ-ꢓꢖꢓꢀ1ꢀꢝ'ꢀꢒꢐꢙꢗ*ꢗꢀ5*ꢑꢐꢓ*ꢉꢀꢜꢛꢗꢖꢀꢑꢐꢚꢐꢙꢖꢀ2ꢜꢐꢑꢕꢚꢓꢙꢀꢒꢛꢜꢜ*ꢙꢕꢖ 7ꢗꢀ4ꢛ*ꢙ)ꢓꢑꢕꢐꢗ ꢀ'*ꢑ0ꢐ

ꢏꢑꢐꢔꢓꢑꢐ)ꢀ8ꢙꢀꢎ9ꢈꢊ9ꢂꢌꢂꢁꢀ5 ꢀ:;ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢁꢂꢄꢀ

Page 209 ends

City of San Dimas
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program
Last Ten Calendar Years
Fiscal Year
2017
Fiscal Year
2015 2016 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Police:

Fire**:

Stations (Los Angeles County Sheriff)
Fire stations (Los Angeles County Fire)
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
Public works:

Streets (miles) 268.56
3,939
268.56
3,939
268.56 268.56
3,939
268.56
3,939
268.56
3,939
268.56
3,939
268.56
3,939
268.56
3,939
268.56
Streetlights 3,939 3,939
City Street Trees 10,362 10,475 10,550 10,600 10,723 10,750 10,785 10,800 10,862 10,862 Parks and recreation:

Parks/recreation sites
Total Acres
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177
Source: City of San Dimas Finance Department
* The City Police Station is owned by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office. **The City of San Dimas is part of the Los Angeles County, Consolidated Fire Protection District. *** Street Lights include poles owned by Southern California Edison and the City of San Dimas -140- Page 210 – 2053
735 E. Carnegie Dr. Suite I 00
San Bernardino. CA 92408
909 889 0871 T
909 889 5361 F
ramscpa. net

PARTNERS
Scott W Manno. CPA. CGMA
Leena Shanbhag, CPA. MST. CGMA
Bradferd A. Welebir. CPA. MBA. CGMA
Jenny W. Liu. CPA, MST
Ga,·denya Duran, CPA, CGMA
Brianna Schultz, CPA. CGMA
Brenda L. Odle. CPA. MST (Partne, Emeritus)
Te, ry P Shea, CPA (Panner Emenws)

MANAGERS/ STAFF
Seong-Hyea Lee. CPA. MBA
Evelyn Morenlin-Barcena. CPA
Vernnica Hernandez, CPA
Laura A1v1zu. CPA
John Maldonado, CPA, MSA
Julia Rodriguez Fuentes. CPA, MSA
Dem, Hite. CPA
Jeffrey McKennan. CPA
Mornca Wysock,, CPA
Jacob Weatherb,e. CPA, MSA
Bolim Han. CPA. MAcc
Anny Gonzalez, CPA

MEMBERS
Amencan lnsutuce of
Certified Public Accountants
PCPS The A/CPA Alliance
(01 CPA Fi,ms
Governmental Audit
Q11C1/1ty Cenre,
Califot nia Society of
Certified Public Accountants
•
Proud Member of
AlliottGlobalAlliance~

ROGERS, ANDERSON , MALODY & SCOTT, LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. SINCE 1948
STABILITY. ACCURACY. TRUST.
-1-

REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL

REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS

BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Honorable City Council
City of San Dimas
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards), the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of San Dimas (the entity) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2024, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the entity’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated November 25, 2024.

Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the entity’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Attachment 2

Page 211 ends

-2-
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses.

However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.

Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the entity’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.

Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

San Bernardino, California
November 25, 2024

Page 212 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Peter Jacoy, Assistant Engineer
Subject: Appropriation of $7,842.59, Award of Construction Contact 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project to Estate Design and Construction Inc. and Approve Overall Project Budget of $1,033,600.00, Including Construction and Engineering Services, Contingency and Holiday Decorations. ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Construction Contract 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project will replace existing streetlights near the Civic Center and on Bonita Avenue from San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue, including Iglesia and Walnut as detailed in Attachment 1. This project encompasses replacing the existing streetlights, the dilapidated conduit, and providing two new meter pedestals. The current streetlight poles and systems show significant deterioration and require replacement.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the following:

1. Appropriate $7,842.59 from City-Wide Light District Fund 7 for the Construction Contract 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project.

2. Award Construction Contract 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project to Estate Design and Construction Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder for the bid amount of $828,000.00.

3. Approve the Plans and Specifications on file in the Public Works Department.

4. Authorize and appropriate total project budget of $1,033,600.00 ($828,000.00 for the construction contract, 20% ($165,600.00) for contingency, construction & engineering services and $40,000.00 for Holiday Decorations).

Page 213 ends

Award of Construction Contact 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project Page 2 For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
7 3
9 5. Authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute the Construction Contract with Estate Design and Engineering Inc. in a form authorized by the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT
Construction Contract 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project budget of $1,300,000 was allocated in FY 2024-25 from City-Wide Light District (Fund 7). The streetlight is in poor condition and in need of immediate repairs Staff recommends that Council consider appropriating the $7,842.59 available in the City-Wide Light District funds to move forward with the project.

Should Council move forward with Construction Contract 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project, the total project budget will include the contract construction costs, as well as 20% Contingency and engineering service. Incorporating the lowest bid, the project budget is as follows:

Construction Bid $828,000.00
Project Contingency
and Engineering Services & Inspection, (20%) $165,600.00 Holiday Decorations $40,000.00
Total Project Budget: $1,033,600.00
The anticipated total construction project budget expenditure for CC2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project is $1,033,600.00.

Staff recommends including additional funds for holiday decorations along Bonita Avenue from San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue. The cost for these decorations is estimated at $40,000, and installation would require approximately one week of staff time to assemble (for first installation) and one week to install and remove each year. With the inclusion of this section, holiday decorations would extend along Bonita Avenue from Cataract Avenue to Walnut Avenue, enhancing the festive atmosphere throughout the downtown area.

The Construction Contract 2024-14 is part of a larger project to replace the existing wooden Copenhagen streetlights and red steel pole (6.6 KV) streetlights, as detailed in Attachment 1. The scope includes replacing conduits and foundations. A total of $1,300,000 has been allocated for

Page 214 ends

Award of Construction Contact 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project Page 3 For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
7 3
9 the project across the FY 2023-2024 and FY 2024-2025 budgets under the Citywide Lighting District Fund. With Council approval, City staff have already procured key equipment, including streetlights and pedestals, which will be installed as part of this construction contract.

Overall Project Budget:

Nostalgia Series Street Lights and Pedestals $121,447.00 Approved July 09, 2024 Copenhagen Street Lights $152,795.59 Approved September 10, 2024 Construction Cost (estimated) $1,033,600.00 This Staff Report Overall Project Budget $1,307,842.59
including Material (estimated)

BACKGROUND
Construction Contract 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project aims to replace the existing streetlights near the Civic Center and along Bonita Avenue, spanning from San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue, including Iglesia Street and Walnut Avenue, as detailed in Attachment

1. This project involves replacing deteriorated streetlights and dilapidated conduits, as well as installing two new meter pedestals. The existing streetlight poles and systems have significantly deteriorated, necessitating replacement.

The project includes replacing 43 streetlights, installing 2-meter pedestals, laying 12,500 linear feet of conduit, and installing approximately 220,000 linear feet of wiring.

At the May 11, 2021, council meeting, staff presented the proposed project layout. However, further investigation revealed that the condition of the existing conduit required replacement, prompting a redesign that included the addition of two new pedestals. Electrical outlets were also incorporated into the new Copenhagen streetlight poles.

During the redesign phase, the Red Streetlight (6.6 KV) system failed, Staff consolidated both projects into a single comprehensive replacement effort. The combined design has since been completed. Due to a lead time of 4 to 6 months for the poles, Council approved their procurement during the July 9, 2024, and September 10, 2024, council meetings, allowing the poles to be ordered in advance.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
On November 20, 2024, the City Clerk publicly opened seven (7) formal bids for Construction Contract 2024-14, Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project. The preliminary bid results are as follows:

Company Name Total Bid
1 Estate Design and Construction, Inc $828,000.00
2 Servitek Electric, Inc $949,777.00
3 Marjani Builders, Inc $1,180,650.00
4 Crosstown Electrical & Data, Inc $1,216,985.00
5 Outsource Utility Contractors, LLC $1,248,475.00
6 DBX, Inc $1,622,700.00

Page 215 ends

Award of Construction Contact 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project Page 4 For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
7 3
9 7 CSI Services $1,646,200.00
Following the bid results, Staff reviewed the bid proposal provided by the lowest responsible bidder, Estate Design and Construction Inc. and verified that the contractor's bid bond is issued by an admitted surety, as required by Public Contract Code 20170. It was confirmed through the State Contractor's License Board that the contractor's license #1075658, Class A, is current and active with an expiration date of September 30, 2025. The Contractor, along with its Subcontractors, are registered through the Department of Industrial Relations as required by law (Contractor’s Registration No. 1001158686). Staff checked references provided, and Estate Design and Construction, Inc. has successfully completed several projects for other agencies.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may choose to not award or authorize the construction budget for Construction Contract 2024-14 Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project. The funding allocated for construction could be used to complete other future Street Light Projects. Delaying the Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project would result in increased maintenance costs and would likely result in additional streetlight outages, may require more extensive and costly treatments to complete future repairs or replacements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This item is Categorically Exempt under the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301 Existing Facilities Class 1 operations which consists of the operation, repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing public or private facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Respectfully submitted,
Peter Jacoy
Assistant Engineer
Attachments:

1. Civic Center Downtown Street Light Project - Location Map and Image

2. Previous Council Meeting Staff Reports

Page 216 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

DOWNTOWN STREET LIGHTS
LEGEND:

MARBELITE NOSTALGIA RED STEEL POLE
(REMOVE)

STEEL COPENHAGEN MARBELITE WOODEN COPENHAGEN
(REMOVE)
1 of 1 WOODEN COPENHAGEN AND 6.6 KV (RED STEEL POLE) STREET LIGHT REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Page 217 ends

01171.0006/1013910.1
Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of September 10, 2024
From: Chris Constantin, City Manager
Prepared by: Brandon Slater, Associate Engineer
Subject: Approve the Purchase of Street Lights and Fixtures for the Wooden Street Light and Red Street Light Replacement Project; Relieve ESB Light LLC from their Bid Due to a Clerical Error; Waive Requirement to Publicly Open Bids, Award the Purchase of Decorative City Lighting Equipment to United Electric Supply as the Lowest Responsible Bidder for the Bid Amount of $152,795.59; Authorize a Budget of $152,795.59 for Copenhagen Lights (CS-7767-REV1) Provided by Sun Valley Lighting; and Authorize City Manager to Execute a Purchasing Agreement with United Electric Supply on a Form Approved by the City Attorney.
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The Wooden Copenhagen and Red Steel Pole (6.6 KV) Street Light Replacement Project will replace existing streetlights near the Civic Center and on Bonita Avenue from San Dimas Avenue to Walnut Avenue, including Iglesia and Walnut as detailed in Attachment 1. This project encompasses replacing the existing streetlights, the dilapidated conduit, and providing two new meter pedestals. The current street light poles and systems show significant deterioration and require replacement.

Due to anticipated long lead times, the purchase of Copenhagen Lights (CS-7767-REV1) was bid separate from the construction contract. Nostalgia Series Street Lights that form part of this project were approved for purchase at the July 9th, 2024, Council Meeting. A future staff report will address the award of a construction contract for installing the conduits and foundations.

The entire street lighting project is estimated at $1.3 million. This report covers a portion of the material procurement totaling $152,795.59 for the purchase of Copenhagen Street Lights.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following:

1. Relieve ESB Light LLC from their bid due to a clerical error.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 218 ends

Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project Page 2 For the Meeting of September 10, 2024
01171.0006/1013910.1

2. Waive requirement to publicly open bids.

3. Award the Purchase of Decorative City Lighting Equipment to United Electric Supply as the lowest responsible bidder for the bid amount of $152,795.59.

4. Authorize a budget of $152,795.59 for Copenhagen Lights (CS-7767-REV1) provided by Sun Valley Lighting.

5. Authorize City Manager to execute a purchasing agreement with United Electric Supply on a form approved by the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT
This report includes the material purchase of the Copenhagen Lights, forming part of a larger project. Staff requests Council's approval of $152,795.59, which was allocated in the FY 2023- 2024 budget.

These poles are part of the larger project to replace the existing Wooden Copenhagen and Red Steel Pole (6.6 KV) streetlights, as shown in Attachment 1 including the replacement of conduits and foundations. The engineer’s estimate for the entire project is approximately $1,300,000, allocated across FY 2023-2024 and FY 2024-2025 budgets in the Citywide Lighting District Fund. A more detailed estimate will be provided in a future staff report for the award of the construction cost.

Overall Project Budget
Nostalgia Series Street Lights and Pedestals $121,447.00 Approved July 09, 2024 Copenhagen Street Lights (estimated) $152,795.59 This Staff Report Construction Cost (estimated) $1,025,757.41 Future
Overall Project Budget (estimated) $1,300,000
Staff requested bids for the procurement of Copenhagen style streetlights. The poles and luminaires are manufactured by Sun Valley Lighting to match existing lights already in use by the City. Equipment cost are as follows:

Copenhagen Street Lights manufactured by Sun Valley Lighting (Quantity of 31) for $152,795.59.

BACKGROUND
On August 14, 2024, the City received four (4) bids for the Purchase of Decorative Lighting Equipment. The preliminary bid results are as follows:

Contractor Base Bid
1 ESB Light LLC $ 45,849.00
2 United Electric Supply $ 152,795.59
3 Walters Wholesale Electric $ 162,099.00
4 Rexel USA $ 231,674.78
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 219 ends

Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project Page 3 For the Meeting of September 10, 2024
01171.0006/1013910.1
Upon receipt of the Lowest Bidder’s request for relief, Staff consulted with the City Attorney. The grounds for such relief are provided in Public Contract Code (PCC) Section 5103. The code section is presented below in bold with the analysis included in italics below each section:

Public Contract Code Section 5103 the bidder is required to establish to the satisfaction of the [City] that:
a) a mistake was made
ESB Light LLC Letter received 8/19/24 notified the City that an error was made in the bid proposal for the Purchase of Decorative City Lighting Equipment. b) .. [the contractor] gave the public entity written notice within five working days…after the opening of the bids of the mistake specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred.

ESB Light LLC provided written notification of the error on 8/19/2024. The bid opening was on 8/14/2024. The notice was provided within 5 working days as required. c) The mistake made the bid materially different than [the contractor] intended it to be.

The mistake amount was $229,223 which is more than 25% of the bid constituting a material cost difference.
d) The mistake was made in filling out the bid and not due to error in judgment or to carelessness in inspecting the site of the work, or in reading the plans or specifications.

The distributor reports the mistake was made from a communication error and not from error in judgment or carelessness in inspecting the site of work.

The contractor’s request for relief from the bid meets the criteria for PCC 5103.

The Wooden Copenhagen and Red Steel Pole (6.6 KV) Street Light Replacement Project will replace 28 existing wooden Copenhagen and Red Steel Pole (6.6 KV) streetlights near civic center as shown in attachment 1. The project will replace the existing street lighting on Bonita Ave. between Walnut Ave. and San Dimas Ave., Walnut Ave. between Bonita Ave. and 2nd St., Iglesia Street between Bonita Avenue and 1st Street and San Dimas Avenue between Bonita Ave. and 1st St.

The Wooden Copenhagen street light poles at Civic Center are showing signs of deterioration and need to be replaced. At the May 11, 2021, council meeting, Staff presented the proposed layout. After further investigation, a redesign of the project was required due to the condition of the existing conduit, necessitating replacement and the addition of two new pedestals. Electrical outlets were also added to the new Copenhagen street light poles. During the redesign, the Red Street Lights (6.6 KV) system failed, leading to the combination of both projects into one comprehensive replacement project. The combined design is now finished. As the lead time on the poles is 4 to 6 months, the poles are proposed to be ordered first. The construction contract will be publicly bid and brought for Council consideration also in the near future. Construction is anticipated to start in January of 2025.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 220 ends

Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project Page 4 For the Meeting of September 10, 2024
01171.0006/1013910.1
The City utilizes one supplier in order to match the City’s Standard Copenhagen Street Lights and provide a uniform product for residents throughout the City. All Copenhagen streetlights installed within the city are provided by Sun Valley Lighting and are purchased through their distributors. The street light pole is designed specifically for the City with structural calculations stamped by a licensed engineer.

Purchase of equipment is required to comply with Municipal Code Section 3.28.110. Formal bid procedures for purchase of supplies, services, professional service.... This section was followed with one exception. The “Notice Inviting Bids" was published on public bid boards as well as sent to specific vendors and a time was set for receipt of the bids. However, the bids were not publicly opened as required by the code section. This Code is a City standard intended to prevent collusion and provide public transparency on bids.

Staff consulted with the City Attorney regarding this error and is including the bids received in Attachment 4 for public transparency. The City Attorney indicated the error does not violate State Law and risk of collusion is minimal as there is only one manufacturer of this item, so the cost differential is minor.

Additionally, this is the second time the Copenhagen lights were out to bid with three of the same bidders. The first round of bids was discarded due to language missing in the Notice Inviting Bids that did not specify why the sole manufacturer was required. The Copenhagen Street lights are designed by a licensed engineer for the City. The poles must match existing fixtures used in the City to include aluminum mill thickness, electric outlets, decoration holders, etc.

With the above considerations, Staff recommends that Council waive the requirement for public opening of the bids.

There are thirty Copenhagen street lights required for the Wooden Street light/Red Steel Pole replacement project. One Pole was added to the bid quantity to be installed on San Dimas Avenue just South of the Metro Gold Line Tracks as part of the Gold Line Project. This increases the total quantity to 31 Copenhagen streetlights provided by Sun Valley Lighting.

Ameron poles, Spring City luminaires, Sun Valley Lighting Copenhagen lights and Tesco meter pedestals will be furnished by the City prior to the construction project due to long lead times.

This provides a cost savings to the City and shortens the overall construction schedule.

There are a total of 43 street light poles required for the project. On July 09, 2024, Council approved the purchase of the nostalgic streetlights and pedestal equipment that form part of the project. With the 30 Copenhagen poles, all street light poles and equipment to be furnished by the City for this project will be ordered.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may choose to not approve or authorize the equipment/material cost for the Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project. The funding allocated for the construction could be used to complete other future lighting replacement or repair projects. Delaying the purchase of the materials/equipment may result in increased construction time and delays due to the long lead times required for procurement.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 221 ends

Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project Page 5 For the Meeting of September 10, 2024
01171.0006/1013910.1

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA guidelines, Title 14, Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15302. Replacement or Reconstruction Class 2.

Respectfully submitted,
Brandon Slater
Associate Engineer
Attachments:

1. Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project - Location Map and Image

2. Purchase of Decorative Lighting Equipment Bid Specifications

3. Letter to Withdraw Bid due to a Clerical Error for ESB Light LLC

4. Bids Received.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 222 ends

The entire street lighting project is estimated at $1.3 million. This report covers a portion of the material procurement totaling $152,795.59 for the purchase of Copenhagen Street Lights.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following:

1. Relieve ESB Light LLC from their bid due to a clerical error.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 223 ends

Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project Page 2 For the Meeting of September 10, 2024
01171.0006/1013910.1

2. Waive requirement to publicly open bids.

3. Award the Purchase of Decorative City Lighting Equipment to United Electric Supply as the lowest responsible bidder for the bid amount of $152,795.59.

4. Authorize a budget of $152,795.59 for Copenhagen Lights (CS-7767-REV1) provided by Sun Valley Lighting.

5. Authorize City Manager to execute a purchasing agreement with United Electric Supply on a form approved by the City Attorney.

Copenhagen Street Lights manufactured by Sun Valley Lighting (Quantity of 31) for $152,795.59.

BACKGROUND
On August 14, 2024, the City received four (4) bids for the Purchase of Decorative Lighting Equipment. The preliminary bid results are as follows:

Contractor Base Bid
1 ESB Light LLC $ 45,849.00
2 United Electric Supply $ 152,795.59
3 Walters Wholesale Electric $ 162,099.00
4 Rexel USA $ 231,674.78
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 224 ends

The distributor reports the mistake was made from a communication error and not from error in judgment or carelessness in inspecting the site of work.

The contractor’s request for relief from the bid meets the criteria for PCC 5103.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 225 ends

With the above considerations, Staff recommends that Council waive the requirement for public opening of the bids.

Ameron poles, Spring City luminaires, Sun Valley Lighting Copenhagen lights and Tesco meter pedestals will be furnished by the City prior to the construction project due to long lead times.

This provides a cost savings to the City and shortens the overall construction schedule.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 226 ends

Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project Page 5 For the Meeting of September 10, 2024
01171.0006/1013910.1

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA guidelines, Title 14, Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15302. Replacement or Reconstruction Class 2.

Respectfully submitted,
Brandon Slater
Associate Engineer
Attachments:

1. Wooden Copenhagen and 6.6 kv (Red Steel Pole) Street Light Replacement Project - Location Map and Image

2. Purchase of Decorative Lighting Equipment Bid Specifications

3. Letter to Withdraw Bid due to a Clerical Error for ESB Light LLC

4. Bids Received.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 227 ends

Agenda Item Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Michael O’Brien, Director of Administrative Services Subject: Adopt Ordinance 1318, Amending Chapter 3.30 of the San Dimas Municipal Code to Incorporate Changes to Bidding Threshold Limits as Established by the Uniform Cost Accounting Act and Adding a Section to Make Use of Piggyback Agreements.
____________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION
At the regular City Council meeting of November 26, 2024, the City Council voted 3-0(Nakano and Weber absent) to introduce Ordinance 1318.

Staff recommend the City Council:
• Conduct a second reading; and
• Adopt Ordinance 1318
Respectfully submitted,
Michael O’Brien
Director of Administrative Services
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 1318

Page 228 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE 1318

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AMENDING CHAPTER 3.30 TITLE 3 (REVENUE AND

FINANCE) OF THE SAN DIMAS MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BIDDING

PROCEDURES UNDER THE UNIFORM PUBLIC CONSTRUCITON COST
ACCOUNTING ACT (SECTION 22000, ET SEQ. OF THE PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE)
WHEREAS, local agencies must competitively bid all public projects (as defined by Section 20161 of the California Public Contract Code) in excess of $5,000 in accordance with the requirements applicable to cities set forth in the Public Contract Code, commencing with Section 20160; and
WHEREAS, in 1983, the California Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 1666, which added Chapter 2, commencing with Section 22000, to Part 3 of Division 2 of the California Public Contract Code, known as the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (Public Contract Code Section 22000 et seq.) (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, the Act provides for a uniform cost accounting standard for construction work performed or contracted by local agencies and establishes alternative procedures for bidding public projects; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature recently amended the Act to increase the bidding thresholds for public projects, with the changes becoming effective on January 1, 2025, as outlined in Assembly Bill 2192; and
WHEREAS, the updated bidding thresholds will allow public projects costing up to $75,000 to be completed by City employees, force account, negotiated contract, or purchase order, projects between $75,001 and $220,000 to be let to contract through informal bidding, and projects exceeding $220,001 to require formal bidding procedures; and WHEREAS, any city that wishes to avail itself of the alternative procedures for bidding and contracting for public projects must elect, by resolution, to become subject to the uniform construction cost accounting procedures set forth in the Act and must notify the State Controller of its election; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2019, the City of San Dimas adopted Resolution 2019-43, electing to become subject to the Act and notifying the State Controller of its election; and WHEREAS, California Public Contract Code Section 22034 of the Act requires each public agency that elects to become subject to the uniform construction cost accounting procedures to enact an informal bidding ordinance that complies with the requirements set forth in said Section 22034; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Dimas has determined that adopting these updated thresholds and procedures will enhance efficiencies in the City’s procurement processes and align with state law effective January 1, 2025, to benefit the taxpayers, residents, and businesses of the City; and

Page 229 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 2
M.C.T.A. Amending Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) November 26, 2024
WHEREAS, all other prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred and NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN DIMAS, California, does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. The City Council finds that the above Recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. SAN DIMAS MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT. Chapter 3.30, entitled "Bid Procedures for Public Projects”, is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

3.30,010 Purpose

3.30,020 Definitions

3.30.030 Bidding Procedures for Defined Public Projects

3.30,040 Notice to contractors for informal bids

3.30,050 Informal bidding procedure

3.30,060 Formal Bidding Procedures

3.30.070 Awarding Rejecting formal bids

3.30.080 Exceptions to Competitive Bidding
Requirements

3.30.900 Bid Protests

3.30.100 Plans and Specifications

3.30.110 Emergencies

3.30.120 Compliance with Federal Requirements
Sections

3.30,010

3.30,020

3.30.030

3.30,040

3.30,050

3.30,060

3.30.070

3.30.080

3.30.900

3.30.100

3.30.110
Purpose
Definitions
Bidding Procedures for Defined Public Projects
List of contractors
Informal bidding procedure
Formal Bidding Procedures
Awarding Rejecting formal bids
Bid Protests
Plans and Specifications
Emergencies
Compliance with Federal Requirements

Page 230 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 3
M.C.T.A. Amending Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) November 26, 2024

3.30.010 - Purpose.

A. This Chapter is intended to provide for the City's purchasing procedures for public projects in a manner consistent with State law.

B. The City has elected to become subject to the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (Public Contract Code Section 22000 et seq.) and the contracting procedures set forth therein. Accordingly, the City may procure public projects by force account, negotiated contract, purchase order, informal bidding or formal bidding in accordance with the alternative procedures authorized by the Act and the applicable dollar amount limitations set forth in Section 22032 of the Act, as it may be amended from time to tin1e.

C. Specifically, this Chapter is intended to comply with Public Contract Code section 22034, which requires that a public agency that has elected to become subject to the uniform construction accounting procedures enact an informal bidding ordinance to govern the selection of contractors.

D. This Chapter is also intended to ensure that contracts for public projects in the City meet the requirements of applicable state laws, including California Public Contract Code, Division 2, Part I, and Division 2, Part 3, Local Agency Public Construction Act. All procedures set forth in this Chapter shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with state law.

3.30.020 - Definitions
As used in this Chapter, the following words and terms shall be defined as follows unless the context indicates that a different meaning is intended:

Act means the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (California Public Contract Code Section 22000 et seq.).

Bid means the response submitted by a bidder to an invitation for bids issued by the City for goods, services or public projects.

Commission means the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Commission established pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22010.

Facility shall have the same meaning as set forth in Section 22002 of the Act and includes any plant, building, structure, ground facility, utility system (subject to the limitation found in Public Contract Code Section 22002), real property, streets and highways, or other public work improvement.

Informal Bid or Quotation means a competitive bid that is submitted by a bidder for procurement of goods or services for which formal bidding is not required.

Force Account means work performed on public projects using internal resources, including but not limited to labor, equipment, materials, supplies, and subcontracts of the

Page 231 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 4
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
public agency.

Maintenance Work shall have the same meaning as set forth in Public Contract Code Section 22002. For the purpose of this Chapter, maintenance work is not considered a public project. Maintenance work includes:
(a) The routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of any publicly owned or operated facility for its intended purposes.
(b) Minor repainting.
(c) Resurfacing of streets and highways at less than one inch. (d) Landscape maintenance including mowing, watering, trimming, pruning, planting, replacement of plants, and servicing of irrigation and sprinkler systems. (d)
Piggyback means use of another public agency’s existing contracting and /or bidding procedures to procure the public project as outlined in the awarding bid document.

Public Project shall have the same meaning as set forth in Public Contract Code Section 22002 and includes the following:
(a) Construction, reconstruction, erection, alteration, renovation, improvement, demolition, and repair work involving any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. (b) Painting or repainting of any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. "Public project" does not include maintenance work as defined above.

3.30.030 - Bidding Procedures for Defined Public Projects.

A. The City Manager may cause public projects of $2200,000.00or less to be performed or let to contract by informal procedures as set forth in this Chapter and the Act.

B. The following limits and procedures apply to contracting for public projectsin theCity:
1) Public projects of $7560,000 or less (or the current amount as specified in Article 3, Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 2, Section 22032(a) of the Public Contract Code) may be performed by the employees of the City, by force account, by negotiated contract, or by purchaseorder;
2) public projects of greater than $7560,0010 and up to but less than $22000,000 (or the current amount as specified in Article 3, Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 2, Section 22032(b) of the Public Contract Code) may be let to contract through informal procedures as set forth in this Chapter and the Act, and

Page 232 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 5
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
3) public projects of more than $22000,0010 (or the current amount as specified in Article 3, Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 2, Section 22032(c) of the Public Contract Code) shall, except as otherwise provided in this Chapter or in the Public Contract Code, be let to contract by the formal bidding procedure set forth in this Chapter and the Public Contract Code.

3.30.040 - Notice to contractors for informal bids.

Notice to contractors for informal bids will be in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22034 and Article 2 (commencing with Section 22010) of the uniform construction accounting procedures.

3.30.050 - Informal bidding procedure.

The following procedures shall apply to informal bids for public projects:

A. Notice inviting informal bids.
1) In accordance with Public Contract Code § 22034, when a public project is permitted to be let to contract by informal bidding pursuant to this Chapter, a notice inviting informal bids shall be mailed and/or emailed to all contractors on the list created pursuant to Section 3.30.040 for the category of work being bid. 2) Optional noticing. Notice may be also provided to any additional contractors, publications and/or construction trade journals identified by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee.

B. Exception. If the product or service to be procured for a public project is proprietary in nature such that it can be obtained only from a certain contractor or contractors, the notice inviting informal bids may be sent exclusively to such contractor or contractors.

C. Time of giving notice. All mailing of notices to contractors and construction trade journals pursuant to this Section shall be completed not less than ten calendar days before bids are due.

D. Description of project. The notice inviting informal bids shall describe the project in general terms and how to obtain more detailed information about the project, and state the time and place for the submission of bids.

E. Authority to award contracts. The City Manager is authorized to award a contract for a public project pursuant to the process set forth in this Section if the lowest bid received is fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or less. Contracts valued at more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) shall require City Council approval.

F. Bids exceeding $22000,000.00. If all bids received pursuant to the informal process are

Page 233 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 6
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
in excess of Two Hundred and Twenty Thousand Dollars ($22000,000) (or the current amount as specified in Article 3, Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 2, Section 22034(d) of the Public Contract Code), the City Council may adopt a resolution by a four-fifths vote to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder at Two Hundred and Twelve Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($23512,0500) (or the current amount as specified in Section 22034(d) of the Public Contract Code) or less, if it determines the City's cost estimate was reasonable.

Award of contract. Any contract awarded pursuant to this Chapter section shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, the approving entity may accept either bid.

G. No Bids. If no bids are received, the project may be performed by City employees by force account, or negotiated contract without further complying with this Chapter.

3.30.060 - Formal Bidding Procedures.

For those projects requiring formal bidding under Section 3.30.030, the following procedures shall be used:

A. Publication of Notice. In accordance with Public Contract Code Section § 22037, a notice shall be published, at least once, fourteen (14) calendar days before the date of opening the bids in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the jurisdiction of the City. The notice inviting formal bids shall also be sent electronically, if available, by either facsimile or email, and mailed to all construction trade journals specified by the Commission in accordance with Public Contract Code § 22036 specified as appropriate for the area. The notice shall be mailed at least fifteen (15) calendar days before the date of opening the bids. The notice inviting formal bids shall state the time and place for the receiving and opening of sealed bids and distinctly describe the project. In addition to notice required by this section, the City may give such other notice as it deems proper.

B. Bidder's Security/Failure to Sign Contract. When deemed necessary bidder's security shall be prescribed in the notice inviting bids in an amount equal to ten (I 0%) percent of the amount bid. Bidder's security shall be either a cash deposit with the City, a cashier's or certified check payable to the City, or a bidder's bond. Unsuccessful bidders shall be entitled to the return of bid security within sixty (60) days of the date of the award. On the refusal or failure of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder to execute the contract, the City Council may award the contract to the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Should the lowest responsive and responsible bidder refuse or fail to execute the contract within ten (10) days after the date of the award of the contract, then the bidder shall be deemed to have forfeited the bid security amount to the City. The City may retain as damages an amount out of the bid security equal to the difference between the lowest bid and the second lowest bid and return. the excess bid security amount, if any, to the lowest bidder. All bids must be signed by

Page 234 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 7
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
an individual or individuals authorized to bind the bidder to bid terms.

Bid opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the City Clerk's Office and shall be identified as to bidder, project, and shall state "Bid" on the envelope. Bids shall be opened by the City Clerk's staff in public at the time and place stated in the notice inviting bids. A written record and tabulation shall be made at that time of all bids received by the deadline. Bids that are received after the submittal deadline shall be marked as "Late" and shall not be opened at the bid opening and shall not be considered for award. Bids shall be open for public inspection in accordance to the California Public Records Act.

C. Award of Contracts/Minor Irregularities. Contracts shall be awarded by the City Council to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder whose bid fulfills the purpose intended, according to criteria designated in the solicitation, and provided the award amount is within the unencumbered appropriation for that item. The City Council may waive minor bid irregularities.

D. Change Orders. A "Change Order" shall be used to modify the contract documents regarding contract price, schedule of payments, completion date, plans and specifications, and for unit price overruns and under runs, as specified in the Contract.

Work description and justification must relate to the original project and must be work necessary to achieve original scope of project. After a determination that costs are merited by developments in a specific project, the Purchasing officer, City Manager is authorized to issue Contract Amendments or Change Orders up to the contract contingency approved by the City Council.

E. Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, the City Council may accept either bid.

F. Performance/Labor/materials Bonds. A labor and materials bond, plus a performance bond shall be required, from an acceptable surety, in such amounts and in such a form as the City finds reasonably necessary to protect the public interest.

G. No Bids. If no bids are received, the project may be performed by City employees by force account or negotiated contract, without further complying with this Chapter.

3.30.070 - Rejecting formal bids.

The following rules apply to rejecting formal bids for public projects:

A. In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22038, the City Council may, in its discretion, reject any bids presented, if the City, prior to rejecting all bids, furnishes a written notice to an apparent low bidder. The notice shall inform the bidder of the City's intention to reject the bid and shall be mailed at least two business days prior to the City Council meeting at which the City intends to reject the bid. If after the first invitation of bids all bids are rejected and after reevaluating its cost estimates of the project, the City shall have the option of either of the following:

Page 235 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 8
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
1) Abandoning the project or re-advertising for bids in the manner described by this Chapter.
2) Have the public project done by force account without further complying with this Chapter, provided the City Council has passed a resolution by a four fifths vote declaring that the project can be performed more economically by City employees.

B. Lowest bidder. If a contract is awarded, it shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

C. No bids. If no bids are received through the formal or informal procedure, the project may be performed by the employees of the City, by force account, or negotiated contract without further complying with this Chapter.

3.30.080 – Exceptions to Competitive Bidding Requirements.

Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, the competitive bidding procedures and requirements of this chapter may be dispensed within any of the following instances:

C.(A) Cooperative or piggyback contracting. When the Purchasing Officer identifies a cooperative bidding procedure or a “piggyback” contract prepared by and processed through another local, state, or federal governmental agency or a cooperative purchasing entity set up by or utilized by such governments or public agencies, and where that other agency or entity has completed a competitive bidding procurement that complies with the Public Contract Code for that contract.

3.30.0980 - Bid Protests.

Any interested party may file a protest regarding the procurement decisions authorized under this Chapter.

A. Notice of Decision. After a decision regarding a public project procurement having a value over Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00) has been made, the Department Head or designee shall notify all persons who submitted a response to a City solicitation of intended award. If a bidder is rejected because the bid is found non responsive or because the bidder is deemed not-responsible, the City will give written notice to said bidder of evidence reflecting such decision.

B. Time to File Protest. All protests must be filed in writing and received by the Department Head within five (5) business days following the bid opening.

C. Form of Protest. All protests shall be in writing, state the grounds for the protest, state

Page 236 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 9
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
the facts relevant to the protest, and all evidentiary support to rebut adverse evidence that it or another bidder was either non-responsive or not responsible.

D. City Manager Review. The City Manager or designee shall review the protest and issue a written decision on the protest. The City Manager or designee may base the decision on the written protest alone or may informally gather evidence from the person(s) filing the protest or any other person having relevant information. For procurements having a value of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) or less, the City Manager's or designee's decision shall be final.

E. Hearing on Protest. If a bid was rejected on the grounds that the bidder was not a responsible bidder, the protesting party must submit materials set forth in subdivision (c) above for consideration. An opportunity to be heard will be set within a reasonable time to provide a decision before final approval of the selected low bid. For procurements having a value of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) or less, the City Manager's or designee's decision shall be final.

F. Appeal of City Manager's Decision to City Council. For procurements having a value exceeding Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00), an appeal of the City Manager's decision may be filed with the City Council. All such appeals must be in writing, and shall be filed with the City Clerk within five (5) business days from the date of the City Manager's decision.

G. Failure to Timely Appeal. An interested party who fails to file a protest within the times set forth in this section waives any right to protest the issue further. No appeal to either the City Manager or City Council of any decision to award a bid under may occur once the contract has been awarded.

3.30.100090 - Plans and Specifications.

In accordance with Public Contract Code Section § 22039, the City Council or its designated representative shall adopt plans, specifications, and working details for all public projects exceeding the amount specified in subdivision (B)(3) of Section

3.30.030. In accordance with Public Contract Code Section § 22040, any person may examine the plans, specifications, or working details, or all of these, adopted by the city for any public project.

3.30.11000 - Emergencies.

A. In accordance with Public Contract Code Section § 22035, in cases of emergency when repair or replacements are necessary, the City Council may proceed at once to replace or repair any public facility without adopting plans, specifications, strain sheets, or working details, or giving notice for bids to let contracts. The work may be done by day labor under the direction of the City Manager, by contractor, or by a combination of the two.

B. In case of an emergency, if notice for bids to let contracts will not be given, the City

Page 237 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 10
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
shall comply with Chapter 2.5 of Part 3 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code (commencing with Section 22050)."

3.30.12010- Compliance with Federal Requirements
A. In addition to the provisions of this Chapter, the procurement of all contracts for public projects that are funded in whole or in part with federal grant funds shall be subject to applicable Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards promulgated by the United States Office of Management and Budget, 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations part 200.

B. All violations of federal or criminal law involving fraud, bribery or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award must be disclosed in writing to the federal or pass-through entity in a timely manner prior to awarding the contract.

A. The City must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises and labor surplus firms are used when possible. o Affirmative steps include:
1) Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women’s business enterprises on solicitation lists;
2) Assuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; 3) Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises.
4) Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises.
5) Using the services and assistance, as appropriate, of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce and; 6) Requiring the prime contractor, if subcontracts are to be let, to take the affirmative steps listed above.

B. Conflicts of Interest involving Federal funds. No City employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts.

SECTION 3. CLERICAL ERRORS. The City Council directs the City Clerk to correct any clerical errors found in this Ordinance including, but not limited to, typographical errors, irregular numbering and incorrect section references.

Page 238 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 11
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. Should any section, subsection, clause, or provision of this Ordinance for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; it being hereby expressly declared that this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase hereof would have been prepared, proposed, approved, and ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid, unenforceable, or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. In accordance with California Government Code section 36937, this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from passage and adoption.

SECTION 6. PUBLICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause this ordinance to be published and posted as required by law.

SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted at the duly designated posting places within the City and published once within 15 days after passage and adoption as may be required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of San Dimas hereby designated for that purpose; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within 15 days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 10th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk Jeff Malawy, City Attorney

Page 239 ends

Ordinance 1318 Page 12
M.C.T.A. Chaper 3.36 Title 3 (Revenue and Finance)
November 26, 2024
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that Ordinance 1318 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas on the 26th day of November, 2024, and thereafter passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 10th day of December, 2024. ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 240 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Michael O'Brien, Director of Administrative Services Subject: Receive and File the November 2024 Investment Report ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Monthly Reporting for the City of San Dimas investment of idle funds and cash condition.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
• Receive and file Investment and Cash Condition report for the month of November 2024

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
It is the policy of the City of San Dimas to invest public funds in a manner that will provide an optimal combination of security and investment return while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all State and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.

The priority objectives of the City’s investment activities are as follows: Safety, liquidity and returns.

The City’s investment portfolio as of November 30, 2024 maintained liquid cash in the amount of $14,680,610.77 held between BMO Harris, the City and LAIF and the CALTRUST Liquidity Fund which amounts to just over 20% of the portfolio to provide the cash flow necessary for City payroll and operating expenditures as well as large capital project expenses and unforeseen emergencies that may occur come up throughout the year. The following chart displays the total investments and weighted average yield per investment category:

Page 241 ends

November 2024 Investment Report Page 2
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
The City’s Banking Services Provider BMO Harris provides a fully collateralized checking account whose funds are used to make cash payments for City payroll and operational expenses. The city performs daily bank reconciliations to assure adequate cash is held in the checking account for upcoming expenditures. Cash held in the account earns income credits that accumulate at a rate of .75% which offsets banking service charges that are charged each quarter to the city. As of June 10, 2024, the City opened a collateralized money market account BMO Harris.

Petty Cash is held at City facilities for cashiering purposes and to reimburse small dollar expenditures between $0.01 and $50.00.

The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is considered a Local Agency Investment Pool and acts much like a money market account. Funds can be deposited and withdrawn without penalty.

The pool invests funds in short-term securities and can produce returns at rates like money markets but is considered more secure.

CALTRUST is a public agency that provides investment funds that are liquid, short term, and medium term. The assets held by CALTRUST are managed by State Street Global Advisors.

Since the City first invested with CALTRUST in August of 2010, buying into the Medium-Term Fund. The City has made various contributions throughout the years as well as reinvested any accumulated interest earnings throughout the life of the fund.

In total the weighted average cost of investing in CALTRUST is $9.99. Currently due to increasing interest rates driving market rates down for assets already held, the share price of the fund as of November 30,2024 was $9.83. Until interest rates decline to the point that share price would increase to $9.99 or above, the city would be recognizing a loss on sale. However, the City could pull out funds at any time if liquidity needs arose.

Beginning in the month of January 2024, the City opened a liquid fund with CALTRUST which is not subject to market rate adjustments due to the type of investments utilized. The fund yielded

Page 242 ends

November 2024 Investment Report Page 3
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024

4.98% for the month of November, out yielding LAIF by .46%. The City intends to take advantage of the high yielding short term investments until yields are no longer inverted.

The City Treasurer also utilizes Brokers to purchase investment securities such as Government Sponsored Enterprises (Agency Bonds), Corporate Bonds, U.S. Treasuries and Negotiable CD’s.

The investment policy and California Government Code Section 53600.3 allows the City to invest 30% of its portfolio in Certificates of Deposit and 20% of its portfolio in Corporate Bonds through Brokers. U.S. Treasuries and Government Sponsored Enterprises (Agency Bonds) have no investment limits; however, it is considered a best practice not to invest more than 5% in a single Government Sponsored Enterprises.

The following is a breakdown of the total invested in each type of investment along with its percentage of the portfolio:

Additionally, per the Investment Policy, the City has an established maturity matrix with the investment ranges as follows:

The Cities current investment maturity range is as follows:

The weighted average maturity for all City investments is 1.50 years, The short time to maturity

Page 243 ends

November 2024 Investment Report Page 4
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
of our investments will allows the City to adjust quickly to a rapidly changing interest rate environment.

Specific details pertaining to the Cities investment names, CUSIP #’s, coupon and purchase yields, maturity dates, par and book values are included in the Investment and Cash Condition Report attachment.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Michael O'Brien
Director of Administrative Services
Attachments:

1. Investment and Cash Condition Report

2. Investment Authorization Form

Page 244 ends

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

MONTHLY CASH BALANCE INVESTMENT REPORT
NOVEMBER 2024

ENDING BALANCE
$1,718,738.25
BMO HARRIS - MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT $2,874,986.93
$2,640.00
$4,555,990.30
$5,528,255.29
$14,249,851.08
CUSIP # COUPON
YIELD

PURCHASE

YIELD MATURITY PAR VALUE BOOK VALUE
CHEVRON - 3 YEAR BOND 166756ALO 1.02% 4.75% 8/12/2027 $250,000.00 $222,444.51 UNITED HEALTH GROUP - 4 YEAR BOND 91324PDK5 3.85% 4.73% 6/15/2028 $250,000.00 $241,935.46 NY LIFE GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 64952WFF5 4.70% 4.76% 1/29/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 METLIFE GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 59217GFR5 4.85% 4.90% 1/8/2029 $250,000.00 $249,451.14 MASS MUTUAL GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 57629W4T4 5.15% 5.15% 5/30/2029 $250,000.00 $249,998.23 NORTHWESTERN MUT GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 66815L2Q1 4.71% 5.16% 1/10/2029 $250,000.00 $245,327.02 ATHENE GLOBAL FDG - 5 YEAR BOND 04685A3G4 2.71% 4.43% 1/7/2029 $350,000.00 $326,841.60 TOYOTA MTR CORP 59217GFR5 3.65% 4.20% 1/9/2029 $300,000.00 $293,442.80 RGA GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 76209PAB9 2.70% 4.50% 1/18/2029 $300,000.00 $278,689.63 MUTUAL OF OMAHA - 5 YEAR BOND 62829D2E9 4.75% 4.75% 10/15/2029 $250,000.00 $249,997.05 $2,858,127.44
CALIFORNIA ST DEPT WATER - 4 YEAR BOND 13067WRF1 1.32% 4.70% 12/1/2028 $250,000.00 $215,147.50 YUCAIPA VY CALIF WATER DISTRICT 98840BBD4 2.29% 4.72% 9/1/2027 $250,000.00 $232,227.50 ONTARIO CALIFORNIA PUB - 3 YEAR BOND 68304RCD0 1.81% 4.52% 10/1/2027 $255,000.00 $232,539.60 CALIFORNIA ST UNIV REV SYSTEMWIDE- 4 YEAR BOND 13077DQG0 3.85% 4.70% 6/15/2028 $310,000.00 $270,924.50 SOLANO CALIF COMMUNITY COLLEGE - 4 YEAR BOND 83412PHB1 1.48% 4.50% 8/1/2028 $350,000.00 $308,661.50 $1,259,500.60
FEDERAL NATIONAL MTG ASSN - 4 YEAR BOND 3135GASJ1 4.50% 4.70% 5/17/2028 $250,000.00 $248,175.00 $248,175.00
WELLS FARGO & CO MEDIUM TERM - 3 YEAR BOND 95001DC40 4.50% 4.50% 7/28/2025 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 CFI- 5 YEAR BOND 17298CK64 1.00% 1.00% 8/28/2025 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WK25 0.75% 0.75% 10/30/2025 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP - 5 YEAR BOND 38150EH4 0.80% 0.80% 11/24/2025 $290,000.00 $290,000.00 JP MORGAN BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 48128G3G3 1.20% 1.20% 4/30/2026 $285,000.00 $285,000.00 EXXON MOBILE CORP - 7 YEAR BOND 30231GBD3 2.28% 0.98% 8/16/2026 $250,000.00 $264,953.75 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP - 5 YEAR BOND 38150AJ63 1.70% 1.70% 10/29/2026 $210,000.00 $210,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY FIN GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 61766YGT2 1.35% 1.35% 11/18/2026 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 48128G5Y2 2.10% 2.10% 1/29/2027 $270,000.00 $270,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WS84 2.75% 2.75% 3/2/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY-FIN GLOBAL 5 YEAR BOND 61766YJQ5 3.25% 3.25% 4/13/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 INTEL CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 458140BY5 3.75% 4.25% 8/5/2027 $250,000.00 $244,538.75 $3,314,492.50
UNITED STATES TREASURY BILLS - 6 MONTH 912797LF2 5.04% 5.24% 12/5/2024 $572,000.00 $557,825.27 UNITED STATES TREASURY BILLS - 6 MONTH 912796ZV4 5.28% 5.28% 12/26/2024 $512,000.00 $499,181.57 $1,057,006.84
SYNCHRONY BK RETAIL - 3 YEAR CD 87164WQ68 3.30% 3.30% 8/26/2025 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 CAPITAL ONE BANK - 4 YEAR CD 14042TFH5 2.65% 2.65% 4/13/2026 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SAVINGS - 5 YEAR CD 89235MLC3 0.95% 0.95% 7/15/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 MARINE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 56824JBD54 4.20% 4.20% 11/27/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA NEW YORK - 5 YEAR CD 38149M4T7 2.65% 2.65% 4/13/2027 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 STATE BANK OF INDIA - 5 YEAR CD 856285N64 3.30% 3.30% 6/1/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 CENTRAL BANK LITTLE ROCK ARK - 5 YEAR CD 152577BS0 5.30% 5.30% 6/30/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 $1,727,000.00
CALIFORNIA STATE - 5 YEAR BOND 13063EGT7 4.32% 4.32% 8/1/2029 $275,000.00 $277,068.00 $277,068.00
FEDERAL AGRIC MTG CORP - 3 YEAR BOND 31424WNJ7 4.54% 4.53% 9/9/2027 $265,000.00 $264,999.97 $264,999.97

4.98%
INVESTMENTS HELD WITH GREAT PACIFIC SECURITIES:

TVI CD'S INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL :

TVI CORPORATE BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

CALTRUST INVESTMENT PROGRAM-MEDIUM TERM 4.23%

CALTRUST LIQUIDITY FUND
INVESTMENTS HELD WITH TVI:

PACIFIC SECURITIES COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

PACIFIC SECURITIES CORPORATE BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

PACIFIC SECURITIES GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

TVI MUNICIPAL BONDS SUBTOTAL :

TVI GOVERNMENT AGENCY BONDS SUBTOTAL :

SUMMARY OF BANK BALANCES YIELD

4.518%

BMO HARRIS - GENERAL ACCOUNT

SAN DIMAS PETTY CASH - IMPREST FUNDS

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CA STATE TREASURER

3.91%

INVESTMENTS
TVI TRESURY BILLS INVESTMENT SUBTOTAL:

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 245 ends

FEDL NATL MTG ASSN- 5 YEAR BOND 3138L8UV4 2.92% 4.85% 1/1/2025 $300,000.00 $272,755.79 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN- 5 YEAR BOND 3136G4A86 0.50% 0.55% 7/21/2025 $250,000.00 $249,375.00 FEDL FARM CREDIT BANK - 4 YEAR BOND 3133ENEH9 1.13% 1.13% 11/17/2025 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130AL2G8 0.60% 0.75% 2/18/2026 $250,000.00 $248,250.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - DISC BOND - 3YEAR 3138LDPW7 2.68% 4.58% 5/1/2026 $250,000.00 $228,805.98 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 2 YEAR BOND 3138LDYL1 2.47% 4.93% 6/1/2026 $500,000.00 $473,750.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130ANMH0 1.10% 1.42% 8/20/2026 $250,000.00 $246,400.00 FEDL FARM CREDIT BANK BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3133ENSZ4 2.75% 2.75% 4/1/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP MEDIUM TERM - 5 YEAR BOND 3134GXTZ7 3.50% 3.50% 5/26/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 FEDL AGRIC MTG CORP - 3 YEAR BOND 31424WKN1 5.23% 5.23% 6/25/2027 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130ASF53 3.25% 3.41% 6/30/2027 $500,000.00 $499,250.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130ASZ69 4.05% 4.08% 8/27/2027 $250,000.00 $249,625.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN- 5 YEAR BOND 3140LBSE4 1.09% 4.38% 3/1/2028 $350,000.00 $306,250.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3133ERVH1 4.60% 4.60% 1/2/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN NOTE- 5 YEAR BOND 3135GAN31 5.20% 5.23% 2/14/2029 $500,000.00 $499,375.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP MEDIUM TERM NOT- 5 YEAR BOND 3134H1UZ4 5.00% 5.14% 2/26/2029 $500,000.00 $497,000.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NUUA5 4.52% 4.52% 3/1/2029 $500,000.00 $499,062.50 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XDBP7 4.15% 4.15% 4/1/2029 $400,000.00 $392,857.31 FEDL FARM CREDIT BANK BOND- 5 YEAR BOND 3133ERBB6 5.42% 5.42% 4/16/2029 $300,000.00 $299,190.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP MEDIUM TERM NOTE - 5 YEAR BOND 3134H1Y23 5.09% 5.09% 6/12/2029 $250,000.00 $249,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XKSV0 3.81% 3.81% 7/1/2029 $400,000.00 $387,000.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 314HU7G5 2.74% 2.74% 8/1/2029 $500,000.00 $472,031.25 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP MEDIUM TERM NOTE - 5 YEAR BOND 3134HADQ3 5.05% 5.05% 8/7/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130B2BA2 5.05% 5.05% 8/20/2029 $500,000.00 $499,500.00 FEDL FARM CREDIT BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3133ERQK0 5.30% 5.30% 8/22/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XFSR0 4.42% 4.42% 9/1/2029 $500,000.00 $494,687.50 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130B2KZ7 5.00% 5.00% 9/11/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3130B2TY1 4.68% 4.68% 9/27/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 340NWFK6 4.01% 4.37% 10/1/2029 $500,000.00 $492,656.25 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140HV4J0 2.14% 2.14% 10/1/2029 $550,000.00 $493,028.24 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3130B2YY5 4.63% 4.80% 10/9/2029 $500,000.00 $499,750.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3130B2YJ8 4.63% 4.63% 10/15/2029 $750,000.00 $750,000.00 $13,049,599.82
BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WP20 1.25% 1.25% 9/24/2026 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06055JEC9 5.50% 5.50% 4/19/2028 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 APPLE INC - 10 YEAR CORPORATE BOND 037833CR9 3.20% 3.30% 5/11/2027 $250,000.00 $248,850.00 SADDLEBACK VALLEY - 7.75 YEAR BOND (MUNICIPAL BOND) 786318LF0 2.40% 3.41% 8/1/2027 $250,000.00 $238,500.00 $1,237,350.00
U.S TREASURY BILL - 6 MONTH 912797LP0 5.01% 5.20% 12/12/2024 $565,000.00 $550,688.55 $550,688.55
DART BANK - 2.5 YEAR CD 237412AR2 3.00% 3.00% 12/20/2024 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 DIRECT FEDL CREDIT UNION - 2.5 YEAR CD 5460FDD5 3.00% 3.00% 12/23/2024 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 TECHNOLOGY CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 87868YAG8 5.00% 5.00% 1/21/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 VERIDIAN CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 92348DAB5 4.75% 4.75% 1/21/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 EVOLVE FEDL CR UN - 1 YEAR 30053QAB1 5.30% 5.30% 3/12/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SAFRA NATL BANK OF NY - 3 YEAR CD 78658RHM6 2.00% 2.00% 3/24/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 INVESTMENT HELD WITH STIFEL:

STIFEL COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS SUBTOTAL:

STIFEL TRESURY BILLS INVESTMENT SUBTOTAL:

STIFEL GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

Page 246 ends

LIVE OAK BANK- 5 YEAR CD 538036LD4 1.40% 1.40% 3/31/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MEDALLION BANK - 5 YEAR CD 58404DGR6 1.60% 1.60% 3/31/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 CLEARPATH FEDERAL CU BURBANK- 2 YEAR CD 18507MAA9 5.15% 5.15% 4/28/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 DISCOVER BK - 3 YEAR CD 254673B70 2.80% 2.80% 4/28/2025 $247,000.00 $247,000.00 UTAH COMMUNITY CU - 2 YEAR CD 917352AB2 4.80% 4.80% 4/28/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 FLAGSTAR BANK - 5 YEAR CD 33847E3D7 1.15% 1.17% 4/29/2025 $248,000.00 $247,876.00 HSBC BANK - 5 YEAR CALLABLE CD 44329ME33 1.30% 1.30% 5/7/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 INSTITUTION FOR SVGS - 3 YEAR CD 45780PBL8 3.10% 3.10% 5/20/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CARTER FEDERAL C.U 3 YEAR CD 14622LAC6 3.00% 3.00% 6/23/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CORP AMERICA FAMILY CU - 1 YEAR CD 219873AG1 5.25% 5.25% 6/30/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 HUGHES FED CR - 2 YEAR CD 444425AA0 5.25% 5.25% 6/30/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 MID AMERICAN CU - 2 YEAR CD 59522NAE4 5.25% 5.25% 6/30/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 MERITRUST CR UN - 3 YEAR CD 59001PAS8 3.35% 3.35% 7/8/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CREDIT UNION OF TEXAS - 3 YEAR CD 22551KAB8 3.30% 3.30% 7/22/2025 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 TVA CMNTY CR UN - 3 YEAR CD 87305MAB6 3.25% 3.25% 8/4/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 RESOURCE ONE CR UN - 3 YEAR CD 76124YAE6 3.30% 3.30% 8/18/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 IDEAL CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 45157PAY6 4.00% 4.00% 8/29/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ALABAMA CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 01025RAB5 3.60% 3.60% 9/22/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 UNIVERSITY CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 914242AA0 4.00% 4.00% 9/26/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BARCLAYS BANK - 4 YEAR CD 06740KNT0 1.00% 1.00% 12/15/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BELLCO CREDIT UNION - 18 MONTH CD 07833EAJ6 5.15% 5.15% 12/23/2025 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 US ALLIANCE FED C.U - 4 YEAR CD 90352RCD5 1.35% 1.35% 1/28/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK- 3.5 YEAR CD 3078115EL9 3.20% 3.20% 2/5/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CONNEX CREDIT UNION - 18 MONTH CD 208212BN9 4.45% 4.45% 2/27/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CFG COMMUNITY BANK - 3.5 YEAR CD 12527CFL1 3.80% 3.80% 3/11/2026 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 ALASKA US FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 011852AH3 5.15% 5.15% 3/23/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 COMENITY CAPITAL BANK- 4 YEAR CD 20033A2Z8 2.60% 2.60% 4/14/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BAXTER CR UN - 4 YEAR CD 07181JAD6 3.05% 3.05% 6/22/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 INSPIRE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 457731AQ0 5.00% 5.00% 6/30/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK - 5 YEAR CD 649447UZ0 0.70% 0.70% 7/1/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SALLIE MAE BANK SALT LAKE CITY UT - 5 YEAR CD 795451AB9 1.00% 1.00% 7/21/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 AUSTIN TELCO FED CR - 2 YEAR CD 052392DG9 4.25% 4.25% 8/21/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 WORKERS CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 98138MCJ7 4.15% 4.15% 8/31/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 FIRST STATE BANK - 4 YEAR CD 33650TAH3 3.60% 3.60% 9/16/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 QUORUM FED CR - 4 YEAR CD 74909LAB6 3.85% 3.85% 9/23/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 PENTAGON FEDERAL CR UN - 5 YEAR CD CUSIP #70962LAS1 70962LAS1 0.90% 0.90% 9/29/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ONPATH FEDERAL CREDIT UN - 4 YEAR CD 68283MAF3 3.25% 3.25% 9/30/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 HAWAII CENTRAL FCU - 3 YEAR CD 419700AG4 5.50% 5.50% 10/27/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BANK UNITED NA - 5 YEAR CD 066519RW1 1.35% 1.35% 12/8/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BANK HAPOALIM BM - 5 YEAR CD 06251A3K4 1.35% 1.35% 12/16/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 CONNEXUS CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 20825WAR1 1.25% 1.25% 12/23/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 AMERANT BANK - 5 YEAR CD 02357QAQ0 1.60% 1.60% 2/16/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00

Page 247 ends

PIMA CREDIT UNION- 4.5 YEAR CD 722000AA4 5.15% 5.15% 2/17/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 METRO CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 59161YAP1 1.70% 1.70% 2/18/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BEAL BANK PLANO TEXAS - 5 YEAR CD 07371AZQ9 2.05% 2.05% 3/3/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BEAL BANK USA LAS VEGAS - 5 YEAR CD 07371CK81 2.05% 2.05% 3/3/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SPOKANE TEACHERS CR 849061AF3 4.75% 4.75% 3/25/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY- 5 YEAR CD 61773TDN0 3.00% 3.00% 4/29/2027 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 GENERATION BANK ROGERS AR CD - 5 YEAR CD 37149CAV9 3.10% 3.10% 5/6/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - 5 YEAR CD 24951TAT2 3.25% 3.25% 5/13/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 WELLS FARGO SIOUX FALLS - 3 YEAR CD 949764PA6 4.85% 4.85% 5/28/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CREDIT UNION NEW JERSEY - 3 YEAR CD 22552BAA9 5.40% 5.40% 7/9/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 TRUSTONE FINL CR UN - 5 YEAR CD 89841MAF4 3.40% 3.40% 7/19/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BMO HARRIS BANK - 5 YEAR CD 05600XHE3 3.55% 3.55% 7/27/2027 $247,000.00 $247,000.00 THIRD FEDL S&L ASSN - 5 YEAR CD 88413QDM7 3.40% 3.40% 7/27/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 CMNTY COMMERCE BANK CLAREMONT- 5 YEAR CD 20367GBH1 3.30% 3.30% 8/10/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ST VINCENT MED CTR CR - 5 YEAR CD 85279AAA0 3.50% 3.50% 8/12/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 PITTSBURG CITY HALL FCU - 5 YEAR CD 72500MAA3 3.60% 3.60% 8/16/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SHARONVIEW FCU - 5 YEAR CD 819866BL7 3.50% 3.50% 8/16/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GHS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 36266LAA4 3.80% 3.80% 9/15/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 NEW ORLEANS FIREMANS FCU - 5 YEAR CD 647608AH1 5.00% 5.00% 7/17/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 FIRST FOUNDATION BANK - 4 YEAR D 32026U5R3 4.70% 4.70% 5/10/2028 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 FIRST FED SVGS - 3 YEAR CD 32023HBT4 5.25% 5.25% 6/28/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 NUMERICA CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 67054NBK8 5.10% 5.10% 7/31/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 GREEN STATE CREDIT UNION- 5 YEAR CD 39573LEL8 5.00% 5.00% 8/29/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 ALLIANT CREDIT UNION- 5 YEAR CD 01882MAH5 5.35% 5.35% 11/15/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SAN FRANCISCO FEDL CR UNION - 4 YEAR CD 79772FAL0 4.25% 4.25% 11/27/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 $18,127,876.00
$43,971,884.72
$72,902,346.57
Amount % of Portfolio Amount % of Portfolio
$4,596,365.18 7% 39,056,164.03 $ 55%
$4,555,990.30 6% 18,326,135.06 $ 25%
$19,778,106.37 27% 15,520,047.48 $ 21%
$16,420,902.23 20% $ 100% 72,902,346.57
$6,088,411.10 10%
$1,607,695.39 2% 1.50
$19,854,876.00 27% 3.94%
$72,902,346.57 100%
Michael O'Brien Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Prepared by: Jennifer Legaspi

INVESTMENTS BY TYPE INVESTMENTS BY MATURITY

CHECKING & MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS/CASH ON HAND
Type
TOTAL CD's/GSE BONDS/ CORPORATE BONDS/TREASURY BILLS

TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS
STIFEL CD'S INVESTMENT SUBTOTAL:

Maturity Range
1 Day to 1 Yr.
1 Yr. to 3 Yrs.
3 Yrs. to 5 Yrs.

Total
The above investments have met the requirements as stated in the City's Annual Investment Policy.

CALTRUST

GSE AGENCY BONDS

COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS
U.S TREASURY BILLS

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)

TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS
Weighted Average Maturity in Years
Weighted Average Yield

Page 248 ends

Attachment 2

Page 249 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council and Successor Agency to the Former San Dimas Redevelopment Agency
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager and Executive Director Prepared by: Michael O'Brien, Director of Administrative Services Subject: Approve Resolutions 2024-86, 2024-87, and 2024-88, Approving the 2025-26 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), the Administrative Budget and Approval to Recognize the Outstanding Loans from the General Fund to the Former Redevelopment Agency as Legitimate Loans to be Paid Back to the General Fund.
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Approval of Resolutions 2024-86, Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), 2024- 87, the Administrative Budget and 2024-88, Request to Recognize the outstanding loans from the General Fund to the former Redevelopment Agency as legitimate loans to be paid back to the General Fund. The request to approve the outstanding loans is based on the Department of Finance (DOF) request to submit additional evidence per the January 24, 2017, denial letter. Staff has gathered the information requested as well as conducted an independent audit of the materials to determine if it meets the conditions outlined in the DOF letter and have prepared the request for approval.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council and Successor Agency jointly adopt Resolutions 2024-86, 2024-87 and 2024-88 and direct staff to submit to the Los Angeles County Consolidated Oversight Board (5th District) and California Department of Finance the ROPS 2025-26 (Attachment “2” hereto) and Administrative Budget FY 2025-26 (Attachment “3” hereto) , and authorize staff to make any changes as requested by the DOF.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the ROPS secures funding from State-distributed Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds (RPTTF) to reimburse the City and Former Successor Agency for previously incurred enforceable obligations. No expenditure of City funds is required.

Page 250 ends

Approve Resolutions 2024-86, 2024-87 and 2024-88 to approve the 2025-26 Recognized obligation payment schedule (ROPS) Page 2
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024

BACKGROUND
ABx1 26 ended redevelopment in California. That legislation, along with AB 1484, sets the rules and procedures for the dissolution of redevelopment agencies. Successor agencies were created by ABx1 26 to settle the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies.

Under current State law, successor agencies are annually provided with tax increment funds to pay the debts of the former redevelopment agencies. Successor agencies must prepare a recognized obligation payment schedule (ROPS) annually.

County auditor controllers use the ROPS to determine the amount of tax increment (RPTTF) it will give to successor agencies for each annual ROPS period. After a successor agency prepares a ROPS, the payment schedule is reviewed and approved by the successor agency’s oversight board and then approved by the California Department of Finance (DOF). 25-26 ROPS Generally:

In prior ROPS periods, the DOF and the Los Angeles County Consolidated Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the San Dimas Redevelopment Agency have approved the ROPS described below and the Los Angeles County Auditor Controller has provided the funding required for the obligations listed in the following schedules:
• 1st ROPS (January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012)
• 2nd ROPS (July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012)
• 3rd ROPS (January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2013)
• ROPS 13-14A (July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013)
• ROPS 13-14B (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2014)
• ROPS 14-15A (July 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014)
• ROPS 14-15B (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2015)
• ROPS 15-16A (July 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015)
• ROPS 15-16B (January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016)
• ROPS 17-18A (July 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016)
• ROPS 17-18 (July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018)
• ROPS 18-19 (July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019)
• ROPS 19-20 (July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020)
• ROPS 20-21 (July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021)
• ROPS 21-22 (July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022)
• ROPS 22-23 (July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023)
• ROPS 23-24 (July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024), and
• ROPS 24-25 (July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025).

The next ROPS 25-26 (July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026) must be submitted to the DOF by February 1, 2025, after approval by the Oversight Board (Attachment “2” hereto). The Successor Agency staff has prepared the attached ROPS 25-26, which the Successor Agency is expected to submit to the Oversight Board to allow the Oversight Board to consider this ROPS at a meeting in January 2025. Hence, staff recommends that the Successor Agency Board submit the proposed ROPS to the Oversight Board, ultimately for submission to the DOF, in order to meet the February 1, 2025, deadline.

Page 251 ends

Approve Resolutions 2024-86, 2024-87 and 2024-88 to approve the 2025-26 Recognized obligation payment schedule (ROPS) Page 3
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
New Requests Attendant to 2025-26 ROPS:

In addition to the ROPS items to be paid to the City as approved in prior years, the 2025-26 ROPS also includes two new items for RPTTF reimbursement. These line items actually represent decades old obligations for which staff has simply been requested to provide more evidence. Specifically, two loans (collectively, “Loans”) were made by the City of San Dimas to the former redevelopment agency, which these loans should legitimately qualify for RPTTF reimbursement as enforceable obligations:
• Rancho San Dimas Loan: Actions prior to and upon October 28, 1997, authorized the City to advance funds for the Target Shopping Center, which the principal for the loan total $1,218,307 as of 1997.

• Creative Growth Loan: Actions prior to and upon August 14, 2001, authorized the City’s general fund to loan the former redevelopment agency $2,1110,000 to fund a variety of redevelopment plans under the former Agency’s Adopted Redevelopment Plan. The City of San Dimas City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board approved the combining of this loan amount with the outstanding principal from the current Creative Growth outstanding balance under the loan agreement established by Resolutions 95-54 and Resolution 145. The approved loan payment schedule was approved on August 14, 2001, to the City of San Dimas City Council and the Redevelopment Agency Board.

The qualification of these Loans for RPTTF reimbursement has been an ongoing point of discussion between the City and State DOF. The DOF has directly stated that the loans may very well qualify as enforceable obligations, so long as the City can provide additional documentation evidencing loan and payment obligations, such as providing executed former redevelopment resolutions or equivalent documents agreeing to repay cash advances, further evidence of financial transfers such as general ledger postings, outstanding balances, principal balance back-up, etc.

City staff has provided the requested documentation to DOF to evidence the commitments and ledgers relating to the loans. However, the DOF will not review or provide a determination regarding the complete package of evidence submitted until the Successor Agency Board once again approves the loans as legitimate as was done on February 13, 2014, and reaffirmed on November 17, 2016. Since the discussion with DOF staff, City staff has identified further evidence to support claimed enforceability of the Loans for RPTTF purposes:
• As to the Rancho San Dimas Loan, City staff has identified the following documents as new evidence to be forwarded to DOF in support of this loan (see, Attachment “5”):
o Loan agreements going back to origination to final loan agreement and supporting repayment schedules that were approved by the Redevelopment Agency Board.
o Reconciliation schedules and Audited Financial Statements that tie to the outstanding principal of the loans.
o Financial documentation showing actual cash transferred to the redevelopment agency from the General Fund for the purpose of the loan. o Independent Auditors review of documents and findings pertaining to items of documentation necessary to approve the loans per the Department of Finance.

Page 252 ends

Approve Resolutions 2024-86, 2024-87 and 2024-88 to approve the 2025-26 Recognized obligation payment schedule (ROPS) Page 4
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
Including the finding that the loan outstanding was related to a principal balance only and not accumulated interest.
• As to the Creative Growth Loan, City staff has identified the following documents as new evidence to be forwarded to DOF in support of this loan (see, Attachment “6”) Loan agreements going back to origination to final loan agreement and supporting repayment schedules that were approved by the Redevelopment Agency Board. o Reconciliation Schedules and Audited Financial Statements that tie to the outstanding principal of the loans.
o Financial documentation showing actual cash transferred to the redevelopment agency from the General Fund for the purpose of the loan. o Independent Auditors review of documents and findings pertaining to items of documentation necessary to approve the loans per the Department of Finance.

Including the finding that the loan outstanding was related to a principal balance only and not accumulated interest.

The proposed 2025-26 ROPS proposes to add these two loans as enforceable line items, with direction to City staff to provide the additional evidence supporting the loans to DOF.

Administrative Budget; DOF Review:

Along with the ROPS, an administrative budget must be approved by the Oversight Board and DOF for the July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 period (Attachment “3” hereto). Staff also requests that the Successor Agency authorize staff to change the ROPS 25-26 and/or the Administrative Budget if needed to satisfy requests from the DOF.

ALTERNATIVES
The Council and Successor Agency Board could elect to deny any or all of the Resolutions, keeping the City from pursing payments for ongoing obligations, administrative costs and/or pursuit of repayment for the loans outstanding.

Respectfully submitted,
Michael O'Brien
Director of Administrative Services

Page 253 ends

Approve Resolutions 2024-86, 2024-87 and 2024-88 to approve the 2025-26 Recognized obligation payment schedule (ROPS) Page 5
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2024-86 Approval of 25-26 ROPS

2. Resolution 2024-87 Approval of Administrative Budget

3. Resolution 2024-88 Approval of Outstanding Loans

4. 2025-26 ROPS Summary and Detail

5. Administrative Budget Detail

6. Independent Auditor Review of requested items from the 2017 DOF determination letter.

7. Evidence Relating to Enforceability of Rancho San Dimas Loan, including loan agreements, Resolutions, minutes, approved repayment schedules, warrants, bank reconciliations, and journal entries establishing cash transfers from the General fund to the former Redevelopment Agency establishing the principal balance owed as well as reconciliation schedules and excerpts from audited financial statements tying to the principal balances owed.

8. Evidence Relating to Enforceability of Creative Growth Loan including loan agreements, Resolutions, minutes, approved repayment schedules, warrants, bank reconciliations, and journal entries establishing cash transfers from the General fund to the former Redevelopment Agency establishing the principal balance owed as well as reconciliation schedules and excerpts from audited financial statements tying to the principal balances owed.

Page 254 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2024-86

A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS,

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS AS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SAN DIMAS REDEVLEOPMENT AGENCY, APPROVING THE JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT

SCHEDULE FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE FORMER REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY TO THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34180 (g)
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB x 126, enacted on June 28, 2011, and as subsequently amended by AB 1484, SB 341, and SB 107 ("Dissolution Act"), the Redevelopment Agency to the City of the City of San Dimas was dissolved as of February 1, 2012, and the City of San Dimas elected to serve as the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency to the City of San Dimas, and
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Sections 34177 (l) (2) (A) requires the Successor Agency to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) and make associated notifications and distributions; and
WHEREAS, the ROPS must be distributed to and approved by the Fifth District Consolidated Oversight Board at its January 13, 2025 meeting pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34180 (g) and 34177 (j) prior to submittal to the Department of Finance by the February 1st 2025 deadline.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby resolve that:

SECTION 1. The forgoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. The Successor Agency Board approves the ROPS for the period July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 and directs the Successor Agency Executive Director, or their designee, to file, post, mail and otherwise deliver via electronic mail, internet posting, and /or hardcopy, all notices and transmittals necessary or convenient in connection with the approval of the ROPS.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2024. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 255 ends

Resolution 2024-86 Page 2
Approving Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) December 10, 2024
I, Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024-86 was adopted by the City Council of San Dimas at its regular meeting of December 10th, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 256 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION 2024-87

A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS,

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS AS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SAN DIMAS REDEVLEOPMENT AGENCY, APPROVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 34177 WHEREAS, pursuant to ABx 1 26, enacted on June 28, 2011, and as subsequently amended by AB 1484, SB 341, and SB 107 ("Dissolution Act"), the Redevelopment Agency to the City of the City of San Dimas was dissolved as of February 1, 2012, and the City of San Dimas elected to serve as the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency to the City of San Dimas.

WHEREAS, the City of San Dimas (“City”), acting in its capacity as the Successor Agency (“Successor Agency”) to the dissolved San Dimas Redevelopment Agency (“RDA”), duly prepared proposed Administrative Budget for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, in accordance with Health and Safety Code sections 34171 (b) and 34177 (j).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby resolve that:

SECTION 1. The forgoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. The Administrative Budget covering the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, attached herein and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, is hereby approved pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 34177 (j), and other law that may apply to the approval by the Oversight Board of the identified budget for the identified period.

SECTION 3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (k), the Secretary or authorized designee shall provide to the County Auditor-Controller administrative cost estimates that are to be paid from the property tax revenues deposited into the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund based on the Administrative Budget for the identified period approved by this Resolution.

Page 257 ends

Resolution 2024-87 Page 2
Administrative Budget
December 10, 2024
I, Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024-87 was adopted by the City Council of San Dimas at its regular meeting of December 10th, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 258 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION 2024-88

A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN DIMAS, CALIFORNIA, AND THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS AS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SAN DIMAS REDEVLEOPMENT

AGENCY, APPROVING AND CONFIRMING CERTAIN

OUTSTANDING LOANS BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUBJECT TO COUNTY OVERSIGHT

BOARD AND STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE APPROVAL ON
THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE.

WHEREAS, the San Dimas Community Redevelopment Agency (“RDA”) was established, organized, existed and transacted business under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code (H&SC) section 33000, et seq. (“CRL”); and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1484 together with ABx1 26, which added Parts 1.8 and 1.85 to Division 24 of the H&SC, as amended (“Dissolution Law”), caused the dissolution and wind down of all redevelopment agencies effective February 1, 2012 and authorized creation of successor agencies to conduct the dissolution activities; and WHEREAS, since February 1, 2012, the City of San Dimas as Successor to the San Dimas Redevelopment Agency (“Agency” or “Successor Agency”) has administered the unwinding of the former RDA’s affairs, including the attainment of a finding of completion pursuant to the Dissolution Law, as amended; and
WHEREAS, as part of the wind down process, on prior occasions, including by letter on January 24, 2017, the Department of Finance has refused to allow the payment on the ROPS of certain outstanding loans between the Agency and the City due to a lack of documentation related to the loans; and
WHEREAS, more recently, Agency staff have collected additional documentation relating to the Rancho San Dimas Loan approved on June 25, 1991 (“Rancho San Dimas Loan”) and the Creative Growth Loan, approved on August 14, 2001 (“Creative Growth Loan” and, together with the Rancho San Dimas Loan, the “Agency Loans”); and WHEREAS, such additional information includes the resolutions approving the loans, the loan documents; the minutes related to the loans, and the transfer of funds related to the loans, among others, all of which are presented herewith; and WHEREAS, in addition an independent auditor, Lance, Soll & Lungard, LLP issued a report based on the additional information, on March 7, 2024 (the “Report”) with respect to the Agency’s Loans to show they were derived from cash transferred from the City into the former RDA; and
WHEREAS, the Report indicates that the principal amount outstanding on the Ranch San Dimas Loan is $1,218,307 exclusive of the interest, and the principal on the Creative Planning Loan is $9,408,970; and
WHEREAS, the Agency Loans will have new repayment schedules based on the interest rate permitted under the Dissolution Law, which may be three percent (“Rate”); and

Page 259 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
2Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
WHEREAS, the repayment schedules are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B and by this reference incorporated herein and may be listed together or separately on the ROPs; and WHEREAS, the City and the Successor Agency have received and reviewed the items described herein and desire to affirm the existence and amount of the Agency Loans based on the evidence and provide for the Agency Loans on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”);

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, CALIFORNIA,

JOINTLY WITH THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER SAN DIMAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DO HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The City Council and Successor Agency boards have reviewed the background, history and documentation supporting the previously issued Agency Loans and find that the prior loan agreements entered into between the City and the former Redevelopment Agency were for legitimate redevelopment purposes;
SECTION 3. The City Council and Successor Agency hereby approve the principal and balances on the Agency Loans as described herein (including $1,218,307 for the Rancho San Dimas Loan which at the time of dissolution had a remaining principal balance due of $964,199.96 and $9,408,970 (which includes $2,110,000 portion of the loan) for the Creative Planning Loan) which at the time of dissolution had a remaining principal balance of $7,736,532.19 and hereby authorize the City Manager to consolidate the Agency Loans with prior outstanding loans of the Agency into one new loan on the ROPs or to list the Agency Loans separately, in his/her discretion, with the accumulated interest rate on the combined remaining principal amount or the separate principal amounts recalculated from the loan origin at the Rate or as may be required by the Dissolution Law.

SECTION 4. The City Council and the Successor Agency find that the annual repayment schedule shall be calculated based upon the current Rate and subject to repayment at an amount that is equal to the maximum amount available under the repayment schedule as specified by the Dissolution Law.

SECTION 5. The Board acknowledges that pursuant to the Law, City Loans are eligible for inclusion on the ROPS assuming approved by the Los Angeles County Fifth District Consolidated Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) and the Department of Finance on the ROPS.

SECTION 6. The City Manager, as Successor Agency Executive Director, is hereby directed to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit this Resolution to Oversight Board, Los Angeles County Administrative Officer, the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller, the State Department of Finance together with the ROPS, and any other agency as may be required. The City Manager is further authorized to perform all acts necessary and appropriate which may be required by the H&SC. This includes, but is not limited to, amendments to this Resolution to comply with the requirements set forth by Los Angeles County, the State or any other applicable agency.

Page 260 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
3Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
SECTION 7. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby further authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the purposes of this Resolution.

SECTION 8. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The City and Successor Agency declare that they would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.

SECTION 9. This Resolution shall be effective upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2024. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor City of San Dimas &
Chair, City of San Dimas as Successor Agency to the
San Dimas Redevelopment Agency
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk
I, Debra Black, City Clerk, hereby certify that Resolution 2024-88 was adopted by the City Council of San Dimas at its regular meeting of December 10th, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Page 261 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
4Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024

EXHIBIT A
Rancho San Dimas Loan
Estimated Payments
Interest
Earned
Principal
Due Interest Due Total Due
1/1/2017
$
964,199.96
$
711,904.82
$
1,676,104.78
4/1/2017
$
12,570.79
$
964,199.96
$
724,475.61
$
1,688,675.57
7/1/2017
$
12,665.07
$
964,199.96
$
737,140.67
$
1,701,340.63
10/1/2017
$
12,760.05
$
964,199.96
$
749,900.73
$
1,714,100.69
1/1/2018
$
12,855.76
$
964,199.96
$
762,756.48
$
1,726,956.44
4/1/2018
$
12,952.17
$
964,199.96
$
775,708.66
$
1,739,908.62
7/1/2018
$
13,049.31
$
964,199.96
$
788,757.97
$
1,752,957.93
10/1/2018
$
13,147.18
$
964,199.96
$
801,905.15
$
1,766,105.11
1/1/2019
$
13,245.79
$
964,199.96
$
815,150.94
$
1,779,350.90
4/1/2019
$
13,345.13
$
964,199.96
$
828,496.08
$
1,792,696.04
7/1/2019
$
13,445.22
$
964,199.96
$
841,941.30
$
1,806,141.26
10/1/2019
$
13,546.06
$
964,199.96
$
855,487.35
$
1,819,687.31
1/1/2020
$
13,647.65
$
964,199.96
$
869,135.01
$
1,833,334.97
4/1/2020
$
13,750.01
$
964,199.96
$
882,885.02
$
1,847,084.98
7/1/2020
$
13,853.14
$
964,199.96
$
896,738.16
$
1,860,938.12
10/1/2020
$
13,957.04
$
964,199.96
$
910,695.20
$
1,874,895.16
1/1/2021
$
14,061.71
$
964,199.96
$
924,756.91
$
1,888,956.87
4/1/2021
$
14,167.18
$
964,199.96
$
938,924.09
$
1,903,124.05
7/1/2021
$
14,273.43
$
964,199.96
$
953,197.52
$
1,917,397.48

Page 262 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
5Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
10/1/2021
$
14,380.48
$
964,199.96
$
967,578.00
$
1,931,777.96
1/1/2022
$
14,488.33
$
964,199.96
$
982,066.33
$
1,946,266.29
4/1/2022
$
14,597.00
$
964,199.96
$
996,663.33
$
1,960,863.29
7/1/2022
$
14,706.47
$
964,199.96
$
1,011,369.80
$
1,975,569.76
10/1/2022
$
14,816.77
$
964,199.96
$
1,026,186.58
$
1,990,386.54
1/1/2023
$
14,927.90
$
964,199.96
$
1,041,114.48
$
2,005,314.44
4/1/2023
$
15,039.86
$
964,199.96
$
1,056,154.33
$
2,020,354.29
7/1/2023
$
15,152.66
$
964,199.96
$
1,071,306.99
$
2,035,506.95
10/1/2023
$
15,266.30
$
964,199.96
$
1,086,573.29
$
2,050,773.25
1/1/2024
$
15,380.80
$
964,199.96
$
1,101,954.09
$
2,066,154.05
4/1/2024
$
15,496.16
$
964,199.96
$
1,117,450.25
$
2,081,650.21
7/1/2024
$
15,612.38
$
964,199.96
$
1,133,062.62
$
2,097,262.58
10/1/2024
$
15,729.47
$
964,199.96
$
1,148,792.09
$
2,112,992.05
1/1/2025
$
15,847.44
$
964,199.96
$
1,164,639.53
$
2,128,839.49
4/1/2025
$
15,966.30
$
964,199.96
$
1,180,605.83
$
2,144,805.79
7/1/2025
$
964,199.96
$
16,086.04
$
-
$
1,196,691.87
$
1,196,691.87
10/1/2025
$
8,975.19
$
-
$
1,205,667.06
$
1,205,667.06
1/1/2026
$
9,042.50
$
-
$
1,214,709.57
$
1,214,709.57
4/1/2026
$
9,110.32
$
-
$
1,223,819.89
$
1,223,819.89
7/1/2026
$
9,178.65
$
-
$
1,232,998.54
$
1,232,998.54
10/1/2026
$
9,247.49
$
-
$
1,242,246.03
$
1,242,246.03
1/1/2027
$
9,316.85
$
-
$
1,251,562.87
$
1,251,562.87
4/1/2027
$
9,386.72
$
-
$
1,260,949.59
$
1,260,949.59
7/1/2027
$
9,457.12
$
-
$
1,270,406.71
$
1,270,406.71

Page 263 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
6Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
10/1/2027
$
9,528.05
$
-
$
1,279,934.76
$
1,279,934.76
1/2/2028
$
9,599.51
$
-
$
1,289,534.28
$
1,289,534.28
4/1/2028
$
9,671.51
$
-
$
1,299,205.78
$
1,299,205.78
7/1/2028
$
9,744.04
$
-
$
1,308,949.83
$
1,308,949.83
10/1/2028
$
9,817.12
$
-
$
1,318,766.95
$
1,318,766.95
1/1/2029
$
9,890.75
$
-
$
1,328,657.70
$
1,328,657.70
4/1/2029
$
9,964.93
$
-
$
1,338,622.63
$
1,338,622.63
7/1/2029
$
10,039.67
$
-
$
1,348,662.30
$
1,348,662.30
10/1/2029
$
10,114.97
$
-
$
1,358,777.27
$
1,358,777.27
1/1/2030
$
10,190.83
$
-
$
1,368,968.10
$
1,368,968.10
4/1/2030
$
10,267.26
$
-
$
1,379,235.36
$
1,379,235.36
7/1/2030
$
10,344.27
$
-
$
1,389,579.63
$
1,389,579.63
10/1/2030
$
10,421.85
$
-
$
1,400,001.47
$
1,400,001.47
1/1/2031
$
10,500.01
$
-
$
1,410,501.49
$
1,410,501.49
4/1/2031
$
10,578.76
$
-
$
1,421,080.25
$
1,421,080.25
7/1/2031
$
10,658.10
$
-
$
1,431,738.35
$
1,431,738.35
10/1/2031
$
10,738.04
$
-
$
1,442,476.39
$
1,442,476.39
1/1/2032
$
10,818.57
$
-
$
1,453,294.96
$
1,453,294.96
4/1/2032
$
10,899.71
$
-
$
1,464,194.67
$
1,464,194.67
7/1/2032
$
10,981.46
$
-
$
1,475,176.13
$
1,475,176.13
10/1/2032
$
11,063.82
$
-
$
1,486,239.95
$
1,486,239.95
1/1/2033
$
11,146.80
$
-
$
1,497,386.75
$
1,497,386.75
4/1/2033
$
11,230.40
$
-
$
1,508,617.15
$
1,508,617.15
7/1/2033
$
299,267.85
$
11,314.63
$
-
$
1,220,663.93
$
1,220,663.93

Page 264 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
7Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
10/1/2033
$
9,154.98
$
-
$
1,229,818.91
$
1,229,818.91
1/1/2034
$
9,223.64
$
-
$
1,239,042.55
$
1,239,042.55
4/1/2034
$
9,292.82
$
-
$
1,248,335.37
$
1,248,335.37
7/1/2034
$
1,000,000.00
$
9,362.52
$
-
$
257,697.89
$
257,697.89
10/1/2034
$
1,932.73
$
-
$
259,630.62
$
259,630.62
1/1/2035
$
1,947.23
$
-
$
261,577.85
$
261,577.85
4/1/2035
$
1,961.83
$
-
$
263,539.68
$
263,539.68
7/1/2035
$
265,516.23
$
1,976.55
$
-
$

0.00 $

0.00

Page 265 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
8Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024

EXHIBIT B
Creative Growth Loan
Estimated Payment
Interest
Earned Principal Due Interest Due Total Due
1/1/2017
$
7,736,532.19
$
4,558,784.95
$
12,295,317.14
4/1/2017
$
92,214.88
$
7,736,532.19
$
4,650,999.83
$
12,387,532.02
7/1/2017
$
92,906.49
$
7,736,532.19
$
4,743,906.32
$
12,480,438.51
10/1/2017
$
93,603.29
$
7,736,532.19
$
4,837,509.61
$
12,574,041.80
1/1/2018
$
94,305.31
$
7,736,532.19
$
4,931,814.92
$
12,668,347.11
4/1/2018
$
95,012.60
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,026,827.52
$
12,763,359.71
7/1/2018
$
95,725.20
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,122,552.72
$
12,859,084.91
10/1/2018
$
96,443.14
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,218,995.86
$
12,955,528.05
1/1/2019
$
97,166.46
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,316,162.32
$
13,052,694.51
4/1/2019
$
97,895.21
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,414,057.53
$
13,150,589.72
7/1/2019
$
98,629.42
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,512,686.95
$
13,249,219.14
10/1/2019
$
99,369.14
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,612,056.09
$
13,348,588.28
1/1/2020
$
100,114.41
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,712,170.51
$
13,448,702.70
4/1/2020
$
100,865.27
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,813,035.78
$
13,549,567.97
7/1/2020
$
101,621.76
$
7,736,532.19
$
5,914,657.54
$
13,651,189.73
10/1/2020
$
102,383.92
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,017,041.46
$
13,753,573.65
1/1/2021
$
103,151.80
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,120,193.26
$
13,856,725.45
4/1/2021
$
103,925.44
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,224,118.70
$
13,960,650.89
7/1/2021
$
104,704.88
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,328,823.58
$
14,065,355.77
10/1/2021
$
105,490.17
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,434,313.75
$
14,170,845.94

Page 266 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
9Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
1/1/2022
$
106,281.34
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,540,595.10
$
14,277,127.29
4/1/2022
$
107,078.45
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,647,673.55
$
14,384,205.74
7/1/2022
$
107,881.54
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,755,555.10
$
14,492,087.29
10/1/2022
$
108,690.65
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,864,245.75
$
14,600,777.94
1/1/2023
$
109,505.83
$
7,736,532.19
$
6,973,751.58
$
14,710,283.77
4/1/2023
$
110,327.13
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,084,078.71
$
14,820,610.90
7/1/2023
$
111,154.58
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,195,233.29
$
14,931,765.48
10/1/2023
$
111,988.24
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,307,221.54
$
15,043,753.73
1/1/2024
$
112,828.15
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,420,049.69
$
15,156,581.88
4/1/2024
$
113,674.36
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,533,724.05
$
15,270,256.24
7/1/2024
$
114,526.92
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,648,250.97
$
15,384,783.16
10/1/2024
$
115,385.87
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,763,636.85
$
15,500,169.04
1/1/2025
$
116,251.27
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,879,888.12
$
15,616,420.31
4/1/2025
$
117,123.15
$
7,736,532.19
$
7,997,011.27
$
15,733,543.46
7/1/2025
$
35,800.04
$
118,001.58
$
7,700,732.15
$
8,115,012.84
$
15,815,744.99
10/1/2025
$
118,618.09
$
7,700,732.15
$
8,233,630.93
$
15,934,363.08
1/1/2026
$
119,507.72
$
7,700,732.15
$
8,353,138.65
$
16,053,870.80
4/1/2026
$
120,404.03
$
7,700,732.15
$
8,473,542.69
$
16,174,274.84
7/1/2026
$
1,000,000.00
$
121,307.06
$
6,700,732.15
$
8,594,849.75
$
15,295,581.90
10/1/2026
$
114,716.86
$
6,700,732.15
$
8,709,566.61
$
15,410,298.76
1/1/2027
$
115,577.24
$
6,700,732.15
$
8,825,143.85
$
15,525,876.00
4/1/2027
$
116,444.07
$
6,700,732.15
$
8,941,587.92
$
15,642,320.07
7/1/2027
$
1,000,000.00
$
117,317.40
$
5,700,732.15
$
9,058,905.32
$
14,759,637.47
10/1/2027
$
110,697.28
$
5,700,732.15
$
9,169,602.60
$
14,870,334.75

Page 267 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
10Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
1/2/2028
$
111,527.51
$
5,700,732.15
$
9,281,130.11
$
14,981,862.26
4/1/2028
$
112,363.97
$
5,700,732.15
$
9,393,494.08
$
15,094,226.23
7/1/2028
$
1,000,000.00
$
113,206.70
$
4,700,732.15
$
9,506,700.78
$
14,207,432.93
10/1/2028
$
106,555.75
$
4,700,732.15
$
9,613,256.53
$
14,313,988.68
1/1/2029
$
107,354.92
$
4,700,732.15
$
9,720,611.44
$
14,421,343.59
4/1/2029
$
108,160.08
$
4,700,732.15
$
9,828,771.52
$
14,529,503.67
7/1/2029
$
1,000,000.00
$
108,971.28
$
3,700,732.15
$
9,937,742.79
$
13,638,474.94
10/1/2029
$
102,288.56
$
3,700,732.15
$
10,040,031.36
$
13,740,763.51
1/1/2030
$
103,055.73
$
3,700,732.15
$
10,143,087.08
$
13,843,819.23
4/1/2030
$
103,828.64
$
3,700,732.15
$
10,246,915.73
$
13,947,647.88
7/1/2030
$
1,000,000.00
$
104,607.36
$
2,700,732.15
$
10,351,523.09
$
13,052,255.24
10/1/2030
$
97,891.91
$
2,700,732.15
$
10,449,415.00
$
13,150,147.15
1/1/2031
$
98,626.10
$
2,700,732.15
$
10,548,041.10
$
13,248,773.25
4/1/2031
$
99,365.80
$
2,700,732.15
$
10,647,406.90
$
13,348,139.05
7/1/2031
$
1,000,000.00
$
100,111.04
$
1,700,732.15
$
10,747,517.95
$
12,448,250.10
10/1/2031
$
93,361.88
$
1,700,732.15
$
10,840,879.82
$
12,541,611.97
1/1/2032
$
94,062.09
$
1,700,732.15
$
10,934,941.91
$
12,635,674.06
4/1/2032
$
94,767.56
$
1,700,732.15
$
11,029,709.47
$
12,730,441.62
7/1/2032
$
1,000,000.00
$
95,478.31
$
700,732.15
$
11,125,187.78
$
11,825,919.93
10/1/2032
$
88,694.40
$
700,732.15
$
11,213,882.18
$
11,914,614.33
1/1/2033
$
89,359.61
$
700,732.15
$
11,303,241.79
$
12,003,973.94
4/1/2033
$
90,029.80
$
700,732.15
$
11,393,271.59
$
12,094,003.74
7/1/2033
$
700,732.15
$
90,705.03
$

0.00 $
11,483,976.62
$
11,483,976.62
10/1/2033
$
86,129.82
$

0.00 $
11,570,106.44
$
11,570,106.44

Page 268 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
11Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
1/1/2034
$
86,775.80
$

0.00 $
11,656,882.24
$
11,656,882.24
4/1/2034
$
87,426.62
$

0.00 $
11,744,308.86
$
11,744,308.86
7/1/2034
$
88,082.32
$

0.00 $
11,832,391.18
$
11,832,391.18
10/1/2034
$
88,742.93
$

0.00 $
11,921,134.11
$
11,921,134.11
1/1/2035
$
89,408.51
$

0.00 $
12,010,542.61
$
12,010,542.61
4/1/2035
$
90,079.07
$

0.00 $
12,100,621.68
$
12,100,621.68
7/1/2035
$
734,483.77
$
90,754.66
$
-
$
11,456,892.58
$
11,456,892.58
10/1/2035
$
85,926.69
$
-
$
11,542,819.27
$
11,542,819.27
1/1/2036
$
86,571.14
$
-
$
11,629,390.42
$
11,629,390.42
4/1/2036
$
87,220.43
$
-
$
11,716,610.84
$
11,716,610.84
7/1/2036
$
1,000,000.00
$
87,874.58
$
-
$
10,804,485.43
$
10,804,485.43
10/1/2036
$
81,033.64
$
-
$
10,885,519.07
$
10,885,519.07
1/1/2037
$
81,641.39
$
-
$
10,967,160.46
$
10,967,160.46
4/1/2037
$
82,253.70
$
-
$
11,049,414.16
$
11,049,414.16
7/1/2037
$
1,000,000.00
$
82,870.61
$
-
$
10,132,284.77
$
10,132,284.77
10/1/2037
$
75,992.14
$
-
$
10,208,276.90
$
10,208,276.90
1/1/2038
$
76,562.08
$
-
$
10,284,838.98
$
10,284,838.98
4/1/2038
$
77,136.29
$
-
$
10,361,975.27
$
10,361,975.27
7/1/2038
$
1,000,000.00
$
77,714.81
$
-
$
9,439,690.09
$
9,439,690.09
10/1/2038
$
70,797.68
$
-
$
9,510,487.76
$
9,510,487.76
1/1/2039
$
71,328.66
$
-
$
9,581,816.42
$
9,581,816.42
4/1/2039
$
71,863.62
$
-
$
9,653,680.05
$
9,653,680.05
7/1/2039
$
1,000,000.00
$
72,402.60
$
-
$
8,726,082.65
$
8,726,082.65
10/1/2039
$
65,445.62
$
-
$
8,791,528.27
$
8,791,528.27

Page 269 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
12Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
1/1/2040
$
65,936.46
$
-
$
8,857,464.73
$
8,857,464.73
4/1/2040
$
66,430.99
$
-
$
8,923,895.71
$
8,923,895.71
7/1/2040
$
1,000,000.00
$
66,929.22
$
-
$
7,990,824.93
$
7,990,824.93
10/1/2040
$
59,931.19
$
-
$
8,050,756.12
$
8,050,756.12
1/1/2041
$
60,380.67
$
-
$
8,111,136.79
$
8,111,136.79
4/1/2041
$
60,833.53
$
-
$
8,171,970.31
$
8,171,970.31
7/1/2041
$
1,000,000.00
$
61,289.78
$
-
$
7,233,260.09
$
7,233,260.09
10/1/2041
$
54,249.45
$
-
$
7,287,509.54
$
7,287,509.54
1/1/2042
$
54,656.32
$
-
$
7,342,165.86
$
7,342,165.86
4/1/2042
$
55,066.24
$
-
$
7,397,232.11
$
7,397,232.11
7/1/2042
$
1,000,000.00
$
55,479.24
$
-
$
6,452,711.35
$
6,452,711.35
10/1/2042
$
48,395.34
$
-
$
6,501,106.68
$
6,501,106.68
1/1/2043
$
48,758.30
$
-
$
6,549,864.98
$
6,549,864.98
4/1/2043
$
49,123.99
$
-
$
6,598,988.97
$
6,598,988.97
7/1/2043
$
1,000,000.00
$
49,492.42
$
-
$
5,648,481.39
$
5,648,481.39
10/1/2043
$
42,363.61
$
-
$
5,690,845.00
$
5,690,845.00
1/1/2044
$
42,681.34
$
-
$
5,733,526.34
$
5,733,526.34
4/1/2044
$
43,001.45
$
-
$
5,776,527.78
$
5,776,527.78
7/1/2044
$
1,000,000.00
$
43,323.96
$
-
$
4,819,851.74
$
4,819,851.74
10/1/2044
$
36,148.89
$
-
$
4,856,000.63
$
4,856,000.63
1/1/2045
$
36,420.00
$
-
$
4,892,420.64
$
4,892,420.64
4/1/2045
$
36,693.15
$
-
$
4,929,113.79
$
4,929,113.79
7/1/2045
$
1,000,000.00
$
36,968.35
$
-
$
3,966,082.14
$
3,966,082.14
10/1/2045
$
29,745.62
$
-
$
3,995,827.76
$
3,995,827.76

Page 270 ends

Resolution 2024-88 Page
13Approving and Confirming Certain Outstanding Loans Between the City and the Successor Agency
December 10, 2024
1/1/2046
$
29,968.71
$
-
$
4,025,796.47
$
4,025,796.47
4/1/2046
$
30,193.47
$
-
$
4,055,989.94
$
4,055,989.94
7/1/2046
$
1,000,000.00
$
30,419.92
$
-
$
3,086,409.87
$
3,086,409.87
10/1/2046
$
23,148.07
$
-
$
3,109,557.94
$
3,109,557.94
1/1/2047
$
23,321.68
$
-
$
3,132,879.62
$
3,132,879.62
4/1/2047
$
23,496.60
$
-
$
3,156,376.22
$
3,156,376.22
7/1/2047
$
1,000,000.00
$
23,672.82
$
-
$
2,180,049.04
$
2,180,049.04
10/1/2047
$
16,350.37
$
-
$
2,196,399.41
$
2,196,399.41
1/1/2048
$
16,473.00
$
-
$
2,212,872.41
$
2,212,872.41
4/1/2048
$
16,596.54
$
-
$
2,229,468.95
$
2,229,468.95
7/1/2048
$
1,000,000.00
$
16,721.02
$
-
$
1,246,189.97
$
1,246,189.97
10/1/2048
$
9,346.42
$
-
$
1,255,536.39
$
1,255,536.39
1/1/2049
$
9,416.52
$
-
$
1,264,952.91
$
1,264,952.91
4/1/2049
$
9,487.15
$
-
$
1,274,440.06
$
1,274,440.06
7/1/2049
$
1,000,000.00
$
9,558.30
$
-
$
283,998.36
$
283,998.36
10/1/2049
$
2,129.99
$
-
$
286,128.35
$
286,128.35
1/1/2050
$
2,145.96
$
-
$
288,274.31
$
288,274.31
4/1/2050
$
2,162.06
$
-
$
290,436.37
$
290,436.37
7/1/2050
$
292,614.64
$
2,178.27
$
-
$

0.00 $

0.00

Page 271 ends

ATTACHMENT 4
San Dimas
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - ROPS Details July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
#
Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
25-26
Total
ROPS 25-26A (Jul - Dec)
25-26A
Total
ROPS 25-26B (Jan - Jun)
25-26B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF AdminRPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF AdminRPTTF
$ 12,766,287 $ 1,291,252 $ - $ - $ - $ 737,515 $ 67,500 $ 805,015 $ - $ - $ - $ 418,737 $ 67,500 $ 486,237 4 Loan to CRA -
Creative Growth
City/Count
y Loan
(Prior
06/28/11),
Cash
exchange
6/30/2001 6/30/2042 City of San
Dimas
Loan for nonhousing projects
(Creative
Growth)-
Remaining
Prinicipal of
$7,736,532.19 +
unpaid interest
pending loan
approval.

Creative
Growth
9,408,970 N $ - - - - - - $ - - - - - - $ -
5 Loan to CRA
Walker House
Fund 30
City/Count
y Loan
(Prior
06/28/11),
Cash
exchange
6/9/2009 6/30/2028 City of San
Dimas
Loan for
rehabilitation
projects
Creative
Growth
1,341,622 N $ 605,044 - - - 605,044 - $ 605,044 - - - - - $ - 6 Loan to Rancho
San Dimas
City/Count
y Loan
(Prior
06/28/11),
Cash
exchange
10/28/2007 6/30/2035 City of San
Dimas
Loan to fund
non-housing
projectsPrincipal
Balance
$964,199.82 +
unpaid interst
upon loan
approval.

Rancho
San
Dimas
1,218,307 N $ - - - - - - $ - - - - - - $ -
7 Loan to CRA
Walker House
Fund 03
ThirdParty
Loans
6/9/2009 6/30/2028 Walker
House
Master
Tennant
Loan for
rehabilitation
projects
Creative
Growth
244,215 N $ 132,471 - - - 132,471 - $ 132,471 - - - - - $ - 9 Administrative
Costs
Admin
Costs
8/23/2012 6/30/2014 City of San
Dimas
Cost to
Administer
Successor
Agency
Creative
Growth/
Rancho
San
Dimas
135,000 N $ 135,000 - - - - 67,500 $ 67,500 - - - - 67,500 $ 67,500 13 Parking Lot
Lease
Business
Incentive
Agreemen
ts
6/1/2007 5/16/2026 Costco
Wholesale
Corp.

Lease to insure
adequate
parking
Creative Growth 418,173 N $ 418,737 - - - - - $ - - - - 418,737 - $ 418,737

Page 272 ends

Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 Period Successor Agency: San Dimas
County: Los Angeles
25-26A Total
(July -
December)
25-26B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 25-26
Total Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ - B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 805,015 $ 486,237 $ 1,291,252 F RPTTF 737,515 418,737 1,156,252
G Administrative RPTTF 67,500 67,500 135,000
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 805,015 $ 486,237 $ 1,291,252 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date

Page 273 ends

ATTACHMENT 5

SAN DIMAS SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATION BUDGET
ROPS 25-26 ( XIX) JULY 2025 – JUNE 2026

EXPENSE CATEGORY AMOUNT NOTES
Staff $55,500 See Staff Cost Chart for detail of hours.

Legal $30,000
Estimate is $5,000 less than actual
for prior 6 months
Consultants $40,000
Tax Consultant - $5,000
Property Disposition - $35,000
Audit/Trustee Fees $9,000 Annual Audit and Bank Fees
Misc. – Travel, supplies $500 DOF meetings, office supplies TOTAL $135,000
% HOURS RATE COST

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
CITY MANAGER 18% 40 $245.03 $9,801.20
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 6% 20 $180.08 $3,601.60
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR 14% 40 $189.34 $7,573.60 CITY CLERK 3% 13 $123.64 $1,607.32
ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR 15% 73 $113.14 $8,221.22

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 2% 7 $154.38 $1,080.66
TOTAL PERSONNEL $31,885.60
OVERHEAD 10% $3,188.56
OFFICE RENT SF 681 $30.00 $20,430.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $55,504.16

RATES ARE PRODUCTIVE HOURLY RATES

Page 274 ends

1611 E. Fourth Street, Suite 200
Santa Ana, CA 92701
(714) 569-1000
203 N. Brea Blvd, Suite 203
Brea, CA 92821
(714) 672-0022
21 Waterway Avenue, Suite 30089
The Woodlands, TX 77380
(936) 828-4587
2151 River Plaza Dr., Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 503-9691
24422 Avenida de la Carlota, Suite 275
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
(949) 829-8299
www.lslcpas.com
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of San Dimas, California
We have performed the procedures enumerated below on the books and records of the City of San Dimas, California (the “City”) to determine whether the principal on the form Redevelopment Agency (“RDA”) Loans were derived from cash transferred from the City into the RDA (the “RDA Loans Test”).

Management of the City has agreed to and acknowledged that the procedures performed are appropriate to meet the intended purpose of determining whether the RDA Loans were derived from cash transferred from the City into the RDA. This report may not be suitable for any other purpose. The procedures performed may not address all the items of interest to a user of this report and may not meet the needs of all users of this report and, as such, users are responsible for determining whether the procedures performed are appropriate for their purposes.

The procedures performed and the results obtained from the performance thereof were as follows:

1. Procedure Performed: We reviewed the State of California Department of Finance’s (the “State”) letter dated January 24, 2017, noting “Walker House” loans valued at $6,523,256, as identified in the State’s letter, were approved by the State and that “Rancho San Dimas” loans valued at $1,218,307 and “Creative Growth” loans valued at $2,110,000, as identified in the State’s letter, were not approved by the State.

Finding: The State identified a memorandum issued by the City Manager that was included with the City’s October 28, 1997, Council Meeting minutes package. The memorandum listed the total outstanding amount of the “Rancho San Dimas” loan, including interest, at $1,218,307, while the payment schedule for this loan lists the outstanding principal at $1,218,307. We agree with the State that the City Manager’s memorandum does not agree to the payment schedule or to the amounts approved by the City Council and RDA during the respective October 28, 1997, meetings. Based on our review of other documentation, as listed in this report, it appears the City Manager’s memorandum is not accurate and the $1,218,307 referenced was not inclusive of interest.

2. Procedure Performed: We reviewed the minutes of the City Council and RDA meetings held on October 28, 1997, for evidence of approval of the “Rancho San Dimas” loan from the City to the RDA.

Finding: We noted the new loan and revised schedule of payments for the amount of $1,218,307 was approved at this meeting, and the minutes of both the City Council and RDA meetings were signed by the Mayor, who was also the Chairman of the RDA.

3. Procedure Performed: We reviewed the minutes of the City Council and RDA meetings held on August 14, 2001, for evidence of approval of the “Creative Growth” loan from the City to the RDA.

Finding: We noted the new loan and revised schedule of payments for the amount of $2,110,000 was approved at these meetings and the meeting minutes of both the City Council and RDA meetings were signed by the Mayor, who was also the Chairman of the RDA. We noted this raised the total outstanding principal amount of the “Creative Growth” loan to $9,408,970 at August 14, 2001. We reviewed the agreement entered into by the City and the RDA for “Creative Growth” loans on June 27, 1995, signed by both the Mayor and the Chairman of the RDA. We also reviewed City Council resolution number 95-94 and RDA resolution number 145, dated June 27, 1995, where both the City Council and the RDA agreed that further loans will be made from the City to the RDA in keeping with the June 27, 1995 agreement.

ATTACHMENT 6

Page 275 ends

To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of San Dimas, California

4. Procedure Performed: We reviewed payment information from the City to the RDA for the RDA Loans to verify payment of these amounts by the City and receipt of these amounts by the RDA and to determine whether the funds were provided to the RDA by the City and to verify that a loan obligation had been incurred.

Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. Based on the procedure performed, the documentation indicates that a loan agreement had been entered into and funds were exchanged.

5. Procedure Performed: We reviewed documentation related to payments made to the City by the RDA subsequent to approval of the loans to determine whether the RDA was making payments for loan obligations that had been incurred, including warrant registers, bank statements, payments made to the City by the RDA, journal entries, loan payment schedules, the City’s audited financial statements, and other documentation.

Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. Based on the procedure performed, the documentation indicates that a loan agreement had been entered into and funds were exchanged.

We were engaged by the City to perform this agreed-upon procedures engagement and conducted our engagement in accordance with attestation standards established by the AICPA. We were not engaged to and did not conduct an examination or review engagement, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion or conclusion, respectively, on the RDA Loans Test. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion or conclusion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you.

We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements related to our agreed-upon procedures engagement.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than that specified party.

Brea, California
March 7, 2024

Page 276 ends

Page 277 ends

Page 278 ends

Page 279 ends

ATTACHMENT 7

Page 280 ends

Page 281 ends

Page 282 ends

Page 283 ends

Page 284 ends

Page 285 ends

Page 286 ends

Page 287 ends

Page 288 ends

Page 289 ends

Page 290 ends

Page 291 ends

Page 292 ends

Page 293 ends

Page 294 ends

Page 295 ends

Page 296 ends

Page 297 ends

Page 298 ends

Page 299 ends

Page 300 ends

Page 301 ends

Page 302 ends

Page 303 ends

Page 304 ends

Page 305 ends

Page 306 ends

Page 307 ends

Page 308 ends

Page 309 ends

Page 310 ends

Page 311 ends

Page 312 ends

Page 313 ends

Page 314 ends

Page 315 ends

Page 316 ends

Page 317 ends

Page 318 ends

Page 319 ends

Page 320 ends

Page 321 ends

Page 322 ends

Page 323 ends

Page 324 ends

Page 325 ends

Page 326 ends

Page 327 ends

Page 328 ends

Page 329 ends

Page 330 ends

Page 331 ends

Page 332 ends

Page 333 ends

Page 334 ends

Page 335 ends

Page 336 ends

Page 337 ends

Page 338 ends

Page 339 ends

Page 340 ends

Page 341 ends

Page 342 ends

Page 343 ends

Page 344 ends

Page 345 ends

Page 346 ends

Page 347 ends

Page 348 ends

Page 349 ends

Page 350 ends

Page 351 ends

Page 352 ends

Page 353 ends

Page 354 ends

Page 355 ends

Page 356 ends

Page 357 ends

Page 358 ends

Page 359 ends

#1 HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
Ref# Fiscal
Year
Loan Principal
Paid
Interest
Paid
Past Due
Scheduled Interest
Payment.
) equates to payment
made.

New New Principal Description
(
From To CRA Loans Amount Due

CITY GENERAL FUND LOAN HISTORY TO CREATIVE GROWTH
Amount due from CRA to 01 = 920113.01 Fund 10 = 140000 Fund 22 = 2284.21 Fund 26 = 121164.95 Combined
Pay back Fund 10, 22, 26
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1980-1981
1981-1982
1982-1983
1983-1984
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
1,204,162.17
559,000.00
350,000.00
1,220,000.00
800,000.00
150,000.00
485,000.00
1,650,000.00
1,911,000.00
3,372,604.88
700,000.00
1,204,162.17
1,684,162.17
1,573,093.11
2,243,093.11
3,043,093.11
1,920,000.00
2,090,508.84
2,909,568.56
3,729,034.26
6,223,051.41
5,693,744.00
79,000.00
461,069.06
550,000.00
New loans and payback bal w/ Gen Ledger
New loans and payback bal w/ Gen Ledger and opening amt adj New loans and no payback bal w/ Gen Ledger and opening amt adj New loan and big payoff bal w/Gen Ledger
New loan and payoff bal w/Gen Ledger
New loan and payoff bal w/Gen Ledger
88-89 Approval by minute action loans needed during FY to cover CRA obligations bal New Loans 6/30/91 minute action loans for RE Acq/Improvements/Admin Exp bal w gl New Loans 6/30/91 minute action loans for RE Acq/Improvements/Admin Exp bal w/gl 1,273,093.11
314,491.16
830,940.28
1,091,534.30
878,587.73
1,229,307.41
10 1989-1990
11 1990-1991
New loans 91-92 to cover expense added to ending principal in 6/30/91 for new total loans-New Sch adopted to pay bak in 5 Yrs @ 10.5% Consolidated loans with plans for large principal payt of 993744 on 7/1/92 which did not happen Changed loan sched to 10 yrs 8.5% (5yrs not possible for payback with funds avail) no payback
12 1991-1992
13 1992-1993
271,539.00
200,000.00
571,539.00
200,000.00
5,993,744.00
5,993,744.00
New loan new sched revised to 9 yrs at 8.5% to get new int and payt amounts not enough $ to pay P&I per sched so paid partial interestand no principal and diff due of interest was added to principal orig int jpayt 529792.46 on paid 389407 bal 140385 add to principal 14 1993-1994 389,407.46 140,385.00 6,134,129.00 and new sch calculated New loan re-calc sched at 8 yrs 8.5% - not enough to pay per py sch Int due was 521400.96 93-94 sch only paid 105,710.60 so bal of int due 415690 was added to princ loan and re-calc
Interest not paid removed from Principal balance 140,385,415,690.36=556,075.36 Interest that was added to principal in 1995-1996 was removed from Principal in 1996- 1997
New Sch 97-98 all loans from all funds to cra princ o/s combined 40 yr sch 4% Partial Refinance of 1991 Tax Allocation Bonds - $3M proceeds paid to principal Sch revised 8/98
6/30/99 Annual Payment on Revised Loan Schedule 30 yrs @ 5.5% Payment 6/20/2000 per Schedule
15 1994-1995
16 1995-1996
91,793.96
537,000.00
415,690.36 6,549,819.36
(556,075.36) 107,730.56 6,101,474.56
17 1996-1997
18 1997-1998
625,355.90 (107,730.00) 901,414.73

0.00 6,895,159.29
6,895,159.29
19 1998-1999
19 1998-1999
20 1999-2000
20 1999-2000
3,000,000.00 3,895,159.29
3,841,229.86
3,784,334.31
53,929.43
56,895.55
214,233.73
211,267.61
632,107.00 4,416,441.31 New loan for 6/30/2000 / new Schedule approved with new Princpal bal 30 yrs 5.5% May 30, 2001 Combined the Loans from General Fund and Fund 79 due from Creative Growth all to the General Fund (*see reference item #22 below) 21 2000-2001 4,416,441.31 Balance as of 6/30/2000 Gen Fund due from CRA 21 2000-2001 60,970.69 242,904.24 4,355,470.62 Principal & Interest paid on Gen Fund loans from 1999-2000 Schedule as due *Combine Fund 79 outstanding principal with Gen Fund as of 6/30/2001 before 21 2000-2001 3,210,942.00 7,566,412.62 scheduled payment 1,894,000 paid to SDRA 6/1/1999 + 1,316,942 06/30/2000. Page 360 – 2053 #1 HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
Ref# Fiscal
Year
Loan Principal
Paid
Interest
Paid
Past Due
Scheduled Interest
Payment.
) equates to payment
made.

New New Principal Description
(
From To CRA Loans Amount Due
Deduct scheduled payment for PY schedule for Fund 79 loans-New Total Princ New Sch 21 2000-2001
21 2000-2001
267,442.39 128,437.68 7,298,969.67 6/30/01 for 2001-02 30 yrs 5.5% approved August 14, 2001 New Loan for 2000-01 and Sub-total new Principal Bal Gen Fund Loans after combining 2,110,000.00 9,408,969.67 Fund 79
Annual Payt Per 2001-2002 Schedule NEW LOAN SCHEDULE APPROVED AUGUST 14, 2001 21 2001-2002
21 2002-2003
21 2003-2004
21 2004-2005
21 2005-2006
21 2006-2007
21 2007-2008
21 2008-2009
21 2009-2010
ENDING
647,387.82
647,387.82
647,387.82
647,387.82
647,387.82
647,387.82
647,387.82
647,387.82
647,387.82
129,894.49
137,038.69
144,575.81
152,527.48
160,916.49
169,766.90
179,104.08
188,954.80
199,347.32
517,493.33
510,349.13
502,812.01
494,860.34
486,471.33
477,620.92
468,283.74
458,433.02
448,040.50
9,279,075.18 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 9,142,036.49 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 8,997,460.68 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 8,844,933.20 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 8,684,016.71 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 8,514,249.81 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 8,335,145.73 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 8,146,190.93 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 7,946,843.61 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001

BALANCE
DUE 2010-
21 2011 647,387.82 210,311.42 437,076.40 7,736,532.19 Annual Payment per Consolidated Loan Schedule Approved 8/14/2001 Last payment made 6/30/2011 with remaining Principal due on General Fund Loans of Total Payt 2001-26,473,878.20 1,672,437.48 4,801,440.72 $7,736,532.19 and Interest of $5,211,224.59 Total due $12,947,756.78 Fund 79 Loans due from Creative Growth Originally done separately - combined with General Fund in 2001 (*see above item #21 combination and payments) 22 1999-2000 1,894,000.00 *99-00 New loan to CRA From 79 (Gen Fund Source) for projects 1st payt 2000-2001 *99-00 Additional Loan from 79 no payments made on py loan - then combined and 22 1999-2000 1,316,942.00 3,210,942.00 included in the ending total of item # 21 CITY GENERAL FUND LOAN TO RANCHO SAN DIMAS FUND 35 APPROVED PER COUNCIL ACTION OCTOBER 28, 1997 1990-1991
1991-1992
1994-1995
1995-1996
1995-1996
0 0
0 0
0 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 180,523.26
189,000.00
185,644.56

0.00 468,079.45
380,704.56
180,523.26
369,523.26
555,167.82
369,523.26
837,602.71
1,218,307.27
185,644.56

0.00 1996-1997
23 1997-1998
23 1998-1999
23 1999-2000
23 2000-2001
23 2001-2002
23 2002-2003
23 2003-2004

0.00 64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26

0.00 15,282.97
15,894.29
16,530.06
17,191.26
17,878.91
18,594.07

0.00 48,732.29
48,120.97
47,485.20
46,824.00
46,136.35
45,421.19
1,218,307.27 No payment scheduled for 97-98
1,203,024.30 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,187,130.01 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,170,599.95 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,153,408.69 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,135,529.78 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,116,935.71 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 Page 361 – 2053 #1 HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
Ref# Fiscal
Year
Loan Principal
Paid
Interest
Paid
Past Due
Scheduled Interest
Payment.
) equates to payment
made.

New New Principal Description
(
From To CRA Loans Amount Due
23 2004-2005
23 2005-2006
23 2006-2007
23 2007-2008
23 2008-2009
23 2009-2010
ENDING
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
19,337.83 44,677.42 1,097,597.88 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,077,486.54 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,056,570.74 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,034,818.31 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,012,195.78 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 988,668.35 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 20,111.34
20,915.80
21,752.43
22,622.53
23,527.43
43,903.92
43,099.46
42,262.83
41,392.73
40,487.83

BALANCE
DUE 2010- Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 And ending Bal due as of 23 2011 64,015.26 24,468.53 39,546.73 964,199.82 6/30/2011 Total Payt 832,198.38 254,107.45 578,090.92

CITY GENERAL FUND TO CREATIVE GROWTH FOR WALKER HOUSE
24 2008-2009
24 2008-2009
24 2009-2010
ENDING
546,177.88
546,177.88
546,177.88

0.00 187,398.80
197,705.73

0.00 358,779.08
348,472.15
6,523,256.00 New Loan from Gen Fund to CRA for Restoration of Walker House 6,335,857.20 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 6/0/2009 FOR 20 YRS @ 5.5% 6,138,151.47 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 6/0/2009 FOR 20 YRS @ 5.5%

BALANCE
DUE 2010- Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 6/0/2009 FOR 20 YRS @ 5.5% And 24 2011 546,177.88 208,579.55 5,929,571.92 remaining balance at 6/30/2011 593,684.08
337,598.33
Total Payt 2,184,711.52 1,044,849.56
Summary:

Remaining Principal Balance as of 6/30/2011 for All Loans to CRA General Fund 01 to Creative Growth CRA
General Fund 01 to Creative Growth CRA Walker House Restoration General Fund 01 To Rancho San Dimas
7,736,532.19
5,929,571.92
964,199.82
Total all loans due to General Fund from Former CRA 14,630,303.93

Page 362 ends

Page 363 ends

Page 364 ends

Page 365 ends

Page 366 ends

Page 367 ends

Page 368 ends

Page 369 ends

Page 370 ends

Page 371 ends

Page 372 ends

Page 373 ends

Page 374 ends

Page 375 ends

Page 376 ends

Page 377 ends

Page 378 ends

Page 379 ends

Page 380 ends

Page 381 ends

Page 382 ends

Page 383 ends

Page 384 ends

Page 385 ends

Page 386 ends

Page 387 ends

Page 388 ends

Page 389 ends

Page 390 ends

Page 391 ends

Page 392 ends

Page 393 ends

Page 394 ends

HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT JOURNAL ENRTY# Document & Page Number 1990-1991
TOTAL:
1991-1992 Back up PDF Rancho Loan
12/31/1991 Loan to RDA 35 Milligan 180,523.26 1
180,523.26
J692
J211
1991-1992 1991-1992 Back up PDF Rancho Loan
12/31/1991 Loan to RDA 35 Milligan 189,000.00 1,2,3
TOTAL: 189,000
1994-1995 1994-1995 Back up PDF Rancho Loan
6/30/1995 Loan From General Fund
6/30/1995 Loan From General Fund
60,644.56
125,000.00
185,644.56
J679
J679
1,4
1,2,3
TOTAL:
1995-1996 1995-1996 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/30/1996 Reduction of loan balance
6/30/1996 Loan From Fund 01
-185,644.56
468,079.45
282,434.89
J713
J724
1 2
TOTAL:
1996-1997 1996-1997 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/30/1997 Loan From Fund 01 380,704.56 1
380,704.56
J680
TOTAL:

Grand Total Principal Loan
Principal Loan Payments Made
Outstanding Principal
1,218,307.27
(254,107.45)
964,199.82

Page 395 ends

Page 396 ends

Page 397 ends

Page 398 ends

Page 399 ends

Page 400 ends

Page 401 ends

Page 402 ends

Page 403 ends

Page 404 ends

Page 405 ends

Page 406 ends

ATTACHMENT 8

Page 407 ends

Page 408 ends

Page 409 ends

Page 410 ends

Page 411 ends

Page 412 ends

Page 413 ends

Page 414 ends

Page 415 ends

Page 416 ends

Page 417 ends

Page 418 ends

Page 419 ends

Page 420 ends

Page 421 ends

Page 422 ends

Page 423 ends

Page 424 ends

Page 425 ends

Page 426 ends

Page 427 ends

Page 428 ends

Page 429 ends

Page 430 ends

Page 431 ends

Page 432 ends

Page 433 ends

Page 434 ends

Page 435 ends

Page 436 ends

Page 437 ends

Page 438 ends

Page 439 ends

Page 440 ends

Page 441 ends

Page 442 ends

Page 443 ends

Page 444 ends

Page 445 ends

Page 446 ends

Page 447 ends

Page 448 ends

Page 449 ends

Page 450 ends

Page 451 ends

Page 452 ends

Page 453 ends

Page 454 ends

Page 455 ends

Page 456 ends

Page 457 ends

Page 458 ends

Page 459 ends

Page 460 ends

Page 461 ends

Page 462 ends

Page 463 ends

Page 464 ends

Page 465 ends

Page 466 ends

Page 467 ends

Page 468 ends

Page 469 ends

Page 470 ends

Page 471 ends

Page 472 ends

Page 473 ends

Page 474 ends

Page 475 ends

Page 476 ends

Page 477 ends

Page 478 ends

Page 479 ends

Page 480 ends

Page 481 ends

Page 482 ends

Page 483 ends

Page 484 ends

Page 485 ends

Page 486 ends

Page 487 ends

Page 488 ends

Page 489 ends

Page 490 ends

Page 491 ends

Page 492 ends

Page 493 ends

Page 494 ends

Page 495 ends

Page 496 ends

Page 497 ends

Page 498 ends

Page 499 ends

Page 500 ends

Page 501 ends

Page 502 ends

Page 503 ends

Page 504 ends

Page 505 ends

Page 506 ends

Page 507 ends

Page 508 ends

Page 509 ends

Page 510 ends

Page 511 ends

Page 512 ends

Page 513 ends

Page 514 ends

Page 515 ends

Page 516 ends

#1 HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
Ref# Fiscal
Year
Loan Principal
Paid
Interest
Paid
Past Due
Scheduled Interest
Payment.
) equates to payment
made.

New New Principal Description
(
From To CRA Loans Amount Due

0.00 6,895,159.29
6,895,159.29
19 1998-1999
19 1998-1999
20 1999-2000
20 1999-2000
3,000,000.00 3,895,159.29
3,841,229.86
3,784,334.31
53,929.43
56,895.55
214,233.73
211,267.61
632,107.00 4,416,441.31 New loan for 6/30/2000 / new Schedule approved with new Princpal bal 30 yrs 5.5% May 30, 2001 Combined the Loans from General Fund and Fund 79 due from Creative Growth all to the General Fund (*see reference item #22 below) 21 2000-2001 4,416,441.31 Balance as of 6/30/2000 Gen Fund due from CRA 21 2000-2001 60,970.69 242,904.24 4,355,470.62 Principal & Interest paid on Gen Fund loans from 1999-2000 Schedule as due *Combine Fund 79 outstanding principal with Gen Fund as of 6/30/2001 before 21 2000-2001 3,210,942.00 7,566,412.62 scheduled payment 1,894,000 paid to SDRA 6/1/1999 + 1,316,942 06/30/2000. Page 517 – 2053 #1 HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
Ref# Fiscal
Year
Loan Principal
Paid
Interest
Paid
Past Due
Scheduled Interest
Payment.
) equates to payment
made.

0.00 0.00

0.00 180,523.26
189,000.00
185,644.56

0.00 468,079.45
380,704.56
180,523.26
369,523.26
555,167.82
369,523.26
837,602.71
1,218,307.27
185,644.56

0.00 1996-1997
23 1997-1998
23 1998-1999
23 1999-2000
23 2000-2001
23 2001-2002
23 2002-2003
23 2003-2004

0.00 64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26
64,015.26

0.00 15,282.97
15,894.29
16,530.06
17,191.26
17,878.91
18,594.07

0.00 48,732.29
48,120.97
47,485.20
46,824.00
46,136.35
45,421.19
1,218,307.27 No payment scheduled for 97-98
1,203,024.30 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,187,130.01 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,170,599.95 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,153,408.69 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,135,529.78 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 1,116,935.71 Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 Page 518 – 2053 #1 HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
Ref# Fiscal
Year
Loan Principal
Paid
Interest
Paid
Past Due
Scheduled Interest
Payment.
) equates to payment
made.

BALANCE
DUE 2010- Annual Payment per Loan Schedule Approved 10/28/97 And ending Bal due as of 23 2011 64,015.26 24,468.53 39,546.73 964,199.82 6/30/2011 Total Payt 832,198.38 254,107.45 578,090.92

CITY GENERAL FUND TO CREATIVE GROWTH FOR WALKER HOUSE
24 2008-2009
24 2008-2009
24 2009-2010
ENDING
546,177.88
546,177.88
546,177.88

0.00 187,398.80
197,705.73

Page 519 ends

Page 520 ends

Page 521 ends

Page 522 ends

Page 523 ends

Page 524 ends

Page 525 ends

Page 526 ends

Page 527 ends

Page 528 ends

Page 529 ends

Page 530 ends

Page 531 ends

Page 532 ends

Page 533 ends

Page 534 ends

Page 535 ends

Page 536 ends

Page 537 ends

Page 538 ends

Page 539 ends

Page 540 ends

Page 541 ends

Page 542 ends

Page 543 ends

Page 544 ends

Page 545 ends

Page 546 ends

Page 547 ends

Page 548 ends

Page 549 ends

Page 550 ends

Page 551 ends

HISTORY OF LOANS TO CRA FROM CITY
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT JOURNAL ENRTY# WARRANT(CHECK) # Document & Page Number 1980-1981 1980-1981 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/30/1979 Due From Fund #33
6/30/1979 Due From Fund #33
6/30/1979 Due From Fund #33
6/30/1979 Due From Fund #33
2/27/1981 General Fund Loan to SDRA
3/31/1981 Loan From 01 to SDRA
5/19/1981 Loan From 01 to SDRA
6/25/1981 Loan From 01 to SDRA
Payback on loan
121,164.95 J861
J861
J861
J861
J463
1 1
1 1
2,6,7
3 4
5,8,9
47,399.99
140,000.00
22,884.21
500,000.00
150,000.00
125,000.00
100,000.00
(2,286.98)
1,204,162.17
1981-1982
150,000.00
200,000.00
50,000.00
79,000.00
30,000.00
50,000.00
559,000.00
1982-1983
25,000.00
10,000.00
30,000.00
60,000.00
150,000.00
25,000.00
50,000.00
350,000.00
1983-1984
70,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
850,000.00
1,220,000.00
1984-1985
100,000.00
100,000.00
400,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
800,000.00
1985-1986
3360
3429
3578
3620
No back up available for reduction
TOTAL:
1981-1982 Back up PDF Creative Growth
8/7/1981
9/2/1981
4/1/1982
Loan From 01 to SDRA
Loan From 01 to SDRA
Loan to SDRA from Fund 01
3736
3800
4226
4248
4289
4398
1,13
3,17,18,19
5,15,21,23
7,25,27
9,29,31
11,33,35
4/27/1982 Lon to SRA from 01
5/3/1982 Loan to SDRA from 01
6/30/1982 Loan to SDRA from 01
TOTAL:
1982-1983 Back up PDF Creative Growth
9/2/1982 Loan From General Fund
11/2/1982 Loan from 01 WR4668
11/30/1982 Loan From 01 WR4715
1/4/1983 Loan From General Fund
2/3/1983 Loan From General Fund
4/1/1983 Loan From General Fund
6/2/1983 Loan to SDRA from 01
J713
J250/J249
J342
J415
J505
J108/J107
J882/J883
1,13
3,29,31
3,23,25,27
4,17,19,21
4,15
4668
4715
4810
4536 6,33,35,37
7,9,11
TOTAL:

TOTAL:

TOTAL:
1983-1984 Back up PDF Creative Growth
8/3/1983 Loan to SDRA from 01
3/1/1984 Loan from General Fund
5/1/1984 Loan From General Fund
7/9/1983 Reciept WR6164 Loan
6/30/1983 Due From Fund #33
J34/J33
J524
J717
J829/J830
C-33/C-34
5310
5827
5984
6164
1,13,15
3,17,19
5,21,23
7,25,27,29,31
9,11
1984-1987 Back up PDF Creative Growth
7/31/1984 Loan to SDRA
1/31/1985 Loan to SDRA
2/28/1985 Loan to SDRA from 01
3/31/1985 Loan from General Fund
6/26/1985 Loan From General Fund
J20/J19
J491
J525
J601
J764
6259
6286
6857
6937
7152
1,2,3,4
5,6,7
8,9,10
11,12
13,14,15

Page 552 ends

11/30/1985 Loan From General Fund
6/30/1987 Loan From General Fund
150,000.00
150,000.00
1986-1987
485,000.00
J257
J536
7573
9038
16,17,18
19,20,21
TOTAL:

TOTAL: 485,000.00
1987-1988 1987-1988 Back up PDF Creative Growth
1/31/1988 Loan From General Fund
3/31/1988 Loan From General Fund
4/30/1988 Loan from General Fund
5/31/1988 Loan From General Fund
6/30/1988 Loan From General Fund
300,000.00
600,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
550,000.00
1,650,000.00
1988-1989
100,000.00
500,000.00
100,000.00
400,000.00
100,000.00
711,000.00
1,911,000.00
1989-1990
400,000.00
100,000.00
500,000.00
100,000.00
400,000.00
100,000.00
110,000.00
250,000.00
55,000.00
1,357,604.88
3,372,604.88
1990-1991
60,000.00
250,000.00
300,000.00
90,000.00
700,000.00
1991-1992
271,539.00
200,000.00
100,000.00
571,539.00
1992-1993
200,000.00
J292
J381
J441
J483
J534
9751
9931
1012
1090
1166
1,2
3,4
5,6
7,8
9,10
TOTAL:
1988-1989 Back up PDF Creative Growth
7/29/1988 Loan From General Fund
9/28/1988 Loan From General Fund
11/30/1988 Loan From General Fund
12/31/1988 Loan From General Fund
3/31/1989 Loan From General Fund
4/25/1989 Loan From Fund 01
J35
J127
J215
J288
J464
1284
1442
1602
1682
1953
2001
1,2
3,4
5,6,7
8,9
10,11
J507/J506 12,13,14
TOTAL:
1989-1990 Back up PDF Creative Growth
8/31/1989 Loan From General Fund
9/30/1989 Loan From General Fund
10/31/1989 Loan From Fund 01
12/31/1989 Loan From Fund 01
1/31/1990 Loan From Fund 01
2/28/1990 Loan From Fund 01
3/31/1990 Loan From Fund 01
4/30/1990 Loan From Fund 01
6/28/1990 Loan From Fund 01
6/29/1990 Loan From Fund 01
J74
J111/J112
J154
2327
2392
2440
2588
2670
2733
2807
2869
3035
3036
1,2
3,4,5
6,7
J223
J297
J349
J397
J440
J547
J548
8,9
10,11
12,13
14,15
16,17
18,19
20,21
TOTAL:

TOTAL:
1990-1991 Back up PDF Creative Growth
10/31/1990 Loan From Fund 01
12/31/1990 Loan From Fund 01
3/31/1991 Loan From Fund 01
6/28/1991 Loan From Fund 01
J171
J265
J471
J631
3314
3420
3635
3884
1,2
3,4
5,6
7,8
1991-1992 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/30/1992 Loan Fund 30 From 01
10/30/1991 Loan to CRA frm General Fund
12/31/1991 Loan to Admin Costs
J510
J105
1 2,3
4,5
4180
4307
TOTAL:
1992-1993 Back up PDF Creative Growth
9/25/1992 Loan From Fund 01 4941 1,2

Page 553 ends

TOTAL: 200,000.00
1993-1994
140,385.00
1993-1994 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/30/1994 Loan From General Fund J541 1
Amount generated from unavailable cash for interest payment that was due in 1993-1994 per schedule. Debt 140,385.00 was removed from loan balance on the loan by the end of 1995-96 1994-1995 1994-1995 Back up PDF Creative Growth
415,690.36 1,2
Amount generated from unavailable cash for interest payment that was due in 1994-1995 per schedule. Debt 415,690.36 was removed from loan balance on the loan by the end of 1995-96 & 1996-97 1995-1996 1995-1996 Back up PDF Creative Growth
107,730.56
TOTAL:

TOTAL:
6/30/1995 Loan From General Fund
6/30/1996 Loan From Fund 01
J676
J731 1
Amount generated from unavailable cash for interest payment that was due in 1995-1996 per schedule. Debt TOTAL: 107,730.56 was removed from loan balance on the loan by the end of 1996-97 1996-1997 1996-1997 Back up PDF Creative Growth
901,414.73
901,414.73
1997-1998
6/30/1997 Loan From Fund 01 J679 1
TOTAL:

TOTAL: -
1998-1999
COMBINED FUND 79 OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL WITH GEN. FUND AS OF 6/30/2001 (2000-2001 PT. 2) 1999-2000 1999-2000 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/30/2000 Loan From Fund 01 632,107.00 J443 1
TOTAL: 632,107.00
1999-2000
COMBINED FUND 79 OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL WITH GEN. FUND AS OF 6/30/2001 (2000-2001 PT. 2) 2000-2001 PT.1 2000-2001 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/30/2001 Loan From Fund 01 2,110,000.00 J528 1,2
TOTAL: 2,110,000.00
2000-2001 PT. 2
1,894,000.00 J387
1,316,942.00 J442
3,210,942.00
1998-1999 & 1999-2000 Back up PDF Creative Growth
6/1/1999 Loan From Fund 79
6/30/2000 Loan From Fund 79
1 2
TOTAL:

Grand Total Principal Loaned
Principal Payments Made
Total Outstanding Principal
20,691,575.70
(12,955,042.95)
7,736,532.75

Page 554 ends

Page 555 ends

Page 556 ends

Page 557 ends

Page 558 ends

Page 559 ends

Page 560 ends

Page 561 ends

Page 562 ends

Page 563 ends

Page 564 ends

Page 565 ends

Page 566 ends

Page 567 ends

Page 568 ends

Page 569 ends

Page 570 ends

Page 571 ends

Page 572 ends

Page 573 ends

Page 574 ends

Page 575 ends

Page 576 ends

Page 577 ends

Page 578 ends

Page 579 ends

Page 580 ends

Page 581 ends

Page 582 ends

Page 583 ends

Page 584 ends

Page 585 ends

Page 586 ends

Page 587 ends

Page 588 ends

Page 589 ends

Page 590 ends

Page 591 ends

Page 592 ends

Page 593 ends

Page 594 ends

Page 595 ends

Page 596 ends

Page 597 ends

Page 598 ends

Page 599 ends

Page 600 ends

Page 601 ends

Page 602 ends

Page 603 ends

Page 604 ends

Page 605 ends

Page 606 ends

Page 607 ends

Page 608 ends

Page 609 ends

Page 610 ends

Page 611 ends

Page 612 ends

Page 613 ends

Page 614 ends

Page 615 ends

Page 616 ends

Page 617 ends

Page 618 ends

Page 619 ends

Page 620 ends

Page 621 ends

Page 622 ends

Page 623 ends

Page 624 ends

Page 625 ends

Page 626 ends

Page 627 ends

Page 628 ends

Page 629 ends

Page 630 ends

Page 631 ends

Page 632 ends

Page 633 ends

Page 634 ends

Page 635 ends

Page 636 ends

Page 637 ends

Page 638 ends

Page 639 ends

Page 640 ends

Page 641 ends

Page 642 ends

Page 643 ends

Page 644 ends

Page 645 ends

Page 646 ends

Page 647 ends

Page 648 ends

Page 649 ends

Page 650 ends

Page 651 ends

Page 652 ends

Page 653 ends

Page 654 ends

Page 655 ends

Page 656 ends

Page 657 ends

Page 658 ends

Page 659 ends

Page 660 ends

Page 661 ends

Page 662 ends

Page 663 ends

Page 664 ends

Page 665 ends

Page 666 ends

Page 667 ends

Page 668 ends

Page 669 ends

Page 670 ends

Page 671 ends

Page 672 ends

Page 673 ends

Page 674 ends

Page 675 ends

Page 676 ends

Page 677 ends

Page 678 ends

Page 679 ends

Page 680 ends

Page 681 ends

Page 682 ends

Page 683 ends

Page 684 ends

Page 685 ends

Page 686 ends

Page 687 ends

Page 688 ends

Page 689 ends

Page 690 ends

Page 691 ends

Page 692 ends

Page 693 ends

Page 694 ends

Page 695 ends

Page 696 ends

Page 697 ends

Page 698 ends

Page 699 ends

Page 700 ends

Page 701 ends

Page 702 ends

Page 703 ends

Page 704 ends

Page 705 ends

Page 706 ends

Page 707 ends

Page 708 ends

Page 709 ends

Page 710 ends

Page 711 ends

Page 712 ends

Page 713 ends

Page 714 ends

Page 715 ends

Page 716 ends

Page 717 ends

Page 718 ends

Page 719 ends

Page 720 ends

Page 721 ends

Page 722 ends

Page 723 ends

Page 724 ends

Page 725 ends

Page 726 ends

Page 727 ends

Page 728 ends

Page 729 ends

Page 730 ends

Page 731 ends

Page 732 ends

Page 733 ends

Page 734 ends

Page 735 ends

Page 736 ends

Page 737 ends

Page 738 ends

Page 739 ends

Page 740 ends

Page 741 ends

Page 742 ends

Page 743 ends

Page 744 ends

Page 745 ends

Page 746 ends

Page 747 ends

Page 748 ends

Page 749 ends

Page 750 ends

Page 751 ends

Page 752 ends

Page 753 ends

Page 754 ends

Page 755 ends

Page 756 ends

Page 757 ends

Page 758 ends

Page 759 ends

Page 760 ends

Page 761 ends

Page 762 ends

Page 763 ends

Page 764 ends

Page 765 ends

Page 766 ends

Page 767 ends

Page 768 ends

Page 769 ends

Page 770 ends

Page 771 ends

Page 772 ends

Page 773 ends

Page 774 ends

Page 775 ends

Page 776 ends

Page 777 ends

Page 778 ends

Page 779 ends

Page 780 ends

Page 781 ends

Page 782 ends

Page 783 ends

Page 784 ends

Page 785 ends

Page 786 ends

Page 787 ends

Page 788 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Scott Wasserman, Director of Parks & Recreation Subject: Discussion of Cost to Convert a Tennis Court to Pickleball Courts ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The City Council requested that staff provide projected costs to convert one existing tennis court into four pickleball courts.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council receive the report and provide direction as appropriate.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost to convert one existing tennis court into four pickleball courts is between $29,500- $49,500. The final cost would depend on the City Council’s desire to install acoustic sound panels at a cost of $20,000. The sound panels are designed to deaden the sound of the wooden racquet striking the plastic ball by approximately 32 decibels.

These costs are summarized as
follows:

Court Re-surfacing $22,000
Net posts purchase and install $ 3,500
Chain Link Fencing $ 4,000
Acoustic panels $20,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $49,500

BACKGROUND
Pickleball has been played for decades since its invention in Washington in the mid-1960s. In more recent times, the family-friendly sport has seen a major boom in popularity, and it is now

Page 789 ends

Cost to Convert a Tennis Court to Pickleball Courts Page 2 For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
one of the fastest growing sports in America. This popularity has created a demand for more public pickleball courts. According to the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, pickleball participation has grown from 4.2 million in 2020 to 13.6 million in 2024.

Pickleball combines elements of tennis, badminton, and table tennis. The game is played on a court with special nets, paddles and a hard-plastic ball that is similar to a whiffle ball. Pickleball can be played as singles or doubles and is recognized as an ideal sport for all ages and athletic abilities. One thing that distinguishes pickleball from other sports is its inherent sense of camaraderie, as it is a very social sport.

The City of San Dimas has not constructed pickleball courts or converted existing tennis courts into pickleball courts. However, several surrounding cities provide pickleball courts. The City’s website directs residents to www.pickleheads.com, which is a website that assists residents to locate public pickleball courts nearby. Examples of available pickleball courts can be found at the Via Verde Country Club (6 courts), Las Flores Park in La Verne (4 courts), Finkbiner Park in Glendora (4 courts), Wheeler Park in Claremont (5 courts) and Upland Indoor Arena Pickleball (8 courts).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
It is generally more cost effective to convert existing tennis courts to pickleball courts than to construct new courts from scratch. One tennis court can be converted into four pickleball courts.

The City currently has four City parks with tennis courts that have the potential to be converted into pickleball courts. These parks are Ladera Serra, Lone Hill, Marchant and Pioneer. However, all four of these parks are located in areas that are directly adjacent to private residences.

As the primary negative issue associated with pickleball is the noise of the impact between ball and paddle, sound deadening panels are recommended for courts less than five hundred feet from any residence. The sound deadening panels cost approximately $20,000 and are designed to reduce noise emanating from the court by 32 decibels. The sound panels have a service life of 8-10 years.

All eight of the of the City’s tennis courts are located within five hundred feet of housing and could potentially have a negative impact on surrounding neighborhoods. Additional impacts experienced by other municipalities that have installed pickleball courts include increased traffic, impacts to parking and noise from players and spectators. Other cities have addressed the noise issues by curtailing the hours that pickleball courts may be used. Some municipalities have experienced physical altercations between pickleball players and tennis players and/or park neighbors who are upset about the impact to their neighborhood.

The conversion of one tennis court into four dedicated pickleball courts requires the re-surfacing of the existing court as well as the replacement of the nets and net posts. Tennis courts in all parks were re-surfaced in FY 2019-2020 and are still in good condition.

Basic Scope of Work to Convert one (1) Tennis court to four (4) Pickleball Courts • Power Wash Tennis Court
• Patch cracks and spalls
• Remove existing tennis net posts and backfill holes with concrete • Grind displaced areas on cracks so both sides are level. • Provide and install four (4) sets of Pickleball Posts, Sleeves and Nets, Core Drilled

Page 790 ends

Cost to Convert a Tennis Court to Pickleball Courts Page 3 For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
• Apply one coat of re-surfacer, 100% latex acrylic mixed with #60 silica sand to smooth out the surface and provide a superior base for color coating. • Apply two coats of Color, 100% latex acrylic, mixed with #90 silica sand for a medium speed of play.
• Color court to accommodate a total of (4) Pickleball Courts on 60 x 120 Tennis Court • Stripe Play Lines, sharp and accurate to ASBA specifications. • Lines to be white latex acrylic line paint unless otherwise specified. • Remove and replace caulking.
• Grind edges for proper adhesion at center joint, at court division, and along the drain system.
• Install new chain link fence between exiting courts.
• Install pickleball court acoustic wraps.

If the City Council wishes to further explore the conversion of one tennis court into four pickleball courts, staff recommends consideration of the inner-most tennis court at Lone Hill Park. This court is 123 feet from the nearest home, which is not ideal. However, tennis courts in other parks are even closer to homes, as summarized below and in the attached aerial maps:
• Marchant Park 30 feet
• Pioneer Park 50 feet
• Ladera Serra Park 78 feet
If the City Council wishes to proceed with the potential conversion of one tennis court, it may wish to direct staff to complete community outreach within a 500-foot radius of the proposed court.

Staff would notify residents via postcard of any public outreach and return to the City Council at a later date to summarize public input and to seek further direction from the City Council.

ALTERNATIVES
This item was requested by the City Council. The City Council can elect not to install any pickleball courts, to convert existing tennis courts into pickleball courts or to construct new pickleball courts.

If the City Council wishes to construct new pickleball courts, a suitable location would need to be identified. If the City Council elects not to build pickleball courts, the existing tennis courts are well used and will continue to serve the San Dimas community.

Respectfully submitted,
Scott Wasserman
Director of Parks & Recreation
Attachments:

1. Aerial maps of Marchant, Pioneer, Ladera Serra and Lone Hill Parks tennis courts

Page 791 ends

Cost to Convert a Tennis Court to Pickleball Courts Page 4 For the Meeting of December 10, 2024

2. Product Information for Acoustic Sound Panels

Page 792 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Aerial Maps of Marchant, Pioneer, Ladera Serra and Lone Hill Parks tennis courts

Page 793 ends

122 Feet
Marchant Park
425 Juanita Ave
Closest residence is 30ft away

MARCHANT PARK
120 Feet

Page 794 ends

Pioneer Park
225 S Cataract Ave
Closest residence is 50 Ft away

PIONEER PARK
78 Feet

Page 795 ends

128 Feet
Ladera Serra Park
975 Calle Serra
Closest residence is 78 Ft away

LADERA SERRA
PARK
120 Feet

Page 796 ends

Lone Hill Park
500 N Shellman Ave
Closest residence is 122.8Ft away

LONE HILL
PARK
540 Feet
440 Feet

Page 797 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 798 ends

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Luis Torrico, Director of Community Development Subject: Discussion of New Objective Design Standards for Multi-family and Mixed-use Developments for SB 330 and SB 35 Eligible Projects
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
State laws require local jurisdictions throughout California to apply streamlined review processes for certain qualifying housing projects and review them against objective design and development standards. The Housing Accountability Act (HAA) established limitations to a local government’s ability to deny or reduce the density of or make infeasible housing development projects that are consistent with objective design standards and contribute to meeting housing needs. In response to the HAA, several other housing bills have been passed such as Senate Bill 330/Housing Crisis Act (HCA) and Senate Bill 35. Both of these Bills require streamlining of affordable housing developments and require that eligible projects be reviewed against objective design review or development standards. In order to maintain some local control and to regulate eligible developments, Staff has prepared objective design standards that will be applicable to eligible multi-family and mixed-use developments.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council review the proposed objective design standards and provide Staff with any comments or questions they may have.

FISCAL IMPACT
The consultant ‘s costs for preparing the objective design standards is $95,910. The expense is fully funded by the SB 2 Planning Grant. This expenditure was budgeted within the fiscal year 2024-25 budget in Account No. 001.4308.020.022 along a matching revenue budget in account number 001.356.007.

BACKGROUND

Page 799 ends

Objective Design Standards Page 2
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024
Over the past several years, the California Legislature has passed a number of housing laws with the intent to alleviate the state’s limited housing supply and affordability crisis. These laws provided statewide initiative and regulations to streamline the process for housing development.

The Housing Accountability Act (HAA) established limitations to a local government’s ability to deny or reduce the density of or make infeasible housing development projects that are consistent with objective design standards and contribute to meeting housing needs. In response to the HAA, several other housing bills have been passed such as Senate Bill 330 (SB 330) (See Attachment 2) and Senate Bill 35 (SB 35) (See Attachment 3).

SB 330 went into effect in 2020 and was passed to increase residential development, protect existing housing inventory and expedite permit processing for eligible residential developments.

Since its passing, the law has been amended to provide clarifications and extend the sunset date from 2025 to 2030. SB 35 went into effect in 2017 and requires cities to streamline residential developments that meet affordability and prevailing wage requirements, by providing a ministerial process and provides flexibility from local parking requirements. Similar to SB 330, SB 35 has been amended to provide clarifications and extend the sunset date from 2026 to 2036. Each of these bills have different eligibility criteria, but both require streamlining of affordable housing developments and require that eligible projects be reviewed against objective design review or development standards.

State law defines an “objective standard” as one that involves no personal or subjective judgement and can be uniformly verified by reference to external and uniform benchmark criteria.

Therefore, the objective standards must be measurable and have clear criteria that are determined in advance so that Staff and an applicant can communicate about a development’s compliance with the standards with specified timelines under the law. In general, the objective design standards will apply to multi-family housing developments, including mixed-use developments. Cities are not required to adopt objective standards; however, without these standards in place, cities will have no control over the appearance and scale of these developments. Projects that are eligible for streamlining and subject to the objective design standards and development standards must meet certain criterion, including:
• SB 330 Projects
o Multi-family housing projects
o Mixed-use projects with at least 2/3 residential square footage o Comply with objective design standards
o No significant public health and safety impacts
• SB 35 Projects
o Multi-family housing projects
o Mixed-use projects with at least 2/3 residential square footage o Comply with objective design standards
o At least 10% or 50% affordable units
o Pay prevailing rate wages (10 units or more)
o No significant public health and safety impacts
In response to the requirements set forth by SB 330 and SB 35, Staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) in 2020 to select a consultant to assist in creating objective design standards that would be applicable to projects that would be eligible for streamlining. Staff selected Moule & Polyzoides (Consultant) to assist the City with the development of objective design standards.

Since 2020, Staff has been working with the Consultant on drafting the standards. However, due to new bills being signed into law and with the progress of the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP), the scope has changed and thus delayed the completion of the standards.

Page 800 ends

Objective Design Standards Page 3
For the Meeting of December 10, 2024

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The implementation of new objective design standards (See Attachment 1) will allow City Staff to regulate development applications that are eligible for streamlined, ministerial processing under the HAA, including SB 35 and SB 330 projects. The proposed standards will be applicable city wide, with the exception of properties located within the DTSP boundaries, which have their own standards for this purpose. The standards are meant to enhance the quality and appearance of development projects. The standards are separated into two (2) categories, i.e. Site Design standards and Building Design standards.

Site design standards are site-specific design criteria that aim to establish consistent guidelines for the look, feel, and functionality of a development site. Elements that are included as part of the site design standards include, but are not limited to parking location and design, circulation, open space, and walls and fences. Similarly, building design standards will regulate the design and appearance of structures in the development related to architectural elements and details, massing and articulation, and colors and materials. Both sets of standards are meant to provide a clear direction for the applicant to ensure well designed and detailed, compatible developments.

Existing development standards such as setbacks and height limits found in the San Dimas Municipal Code will still be applicable.

With the passage of several housing laws that are taking away local control, the implementation of these standards is important to ensure developments constructed pursuant to SB 330, SB 35 and any other applicable housing bills result in high-quality multifamily housing and mixed-use projects that the City is accustomed to. While the City may not have control if some of these developments are built, the implementation of these standards will provide some control on the development’s appearance and architectural quality. Upon receiving any comments from the Council, the draft standards will be finalized and public hearings will be scheduled before the Planning Commission and City Council for final consideration and approval.

ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are proposed for this request.

Respectfully submitted,
Luis Torrico
Director of Community Development
Attachments:

1. Draft Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use Objective Design Standards

2. Senate Bill 330

3. Senate Bill 35

Page 801 ends

MU L TI- F AMI L Y

RES IDENTIAL &

MIXED-USE OBJECTIVE

DESIGN S T AN D ARDS

CITY OF SAN DIMAS, CAL I FOR N IA
DRAFT ATTACHMENT 1

Page 802 ends

Page i
Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
Preface
This document outlines Objective Design Standards for the city of San Dimas. These standards are divided into three sections.

The first section is an introduction to the concept of Objective Design Standards and clarifies the applicability of this document.

The subsequent sections constitute the Objective Design Standards: the second section discusses site-specific design criteria and the third section discusses building design criteria. These standards are to be used for all development of multifamily residential and mixed-use projects, across the city, excluding properties located within the San Dimas Downtown Specific Plan. Standards for those properties can be found in the Downtown Specific Plan.

Acknowledgments
The following entities and individuals contributed to the preparation of this document.

CITY OF SAN DIMAS
245 E. Bonita Ave.

San Dimas, California 91773

CONSULTANT
Moule&Polyzoides, Urban Design & Code
DRAFT

Page 803 ends

Page ii
Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California

M U L T I - F A M I L Y

RESIDENTIAL &

M I X E D - U S E O B J E C T I V E

DESIGN STANDARDS

CITY OF SAN DIMAS, CALIFORNIA
A. Parking Location & Design
B. Circulation
C. Open Space
D. Roof Decks
E. Landscape
F. Lighting
G. Walls & Fences
H. Utilities, Mechanical Equipment & Service Areas
A. Purpose
B. Applicability
A. Building Entries
B. Building Placement & Siting
C. Massing & Articulation
D. Roof Design
E. Architectural Elements & Details
F. Colors & Materials
G. Architectural Consistency
II. S I T E D E S I G N S T A N D A R D S
I. I N T R O D U C T I O N
Table of Contents
III. B U I L D I N G D E S I G N S T A N D A R D S
Adopted by City Council on Month DD, YYYY
DRAFT

Page 804 ends

Page 3 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
I. Introduction
DRAFT

Page 805 ends

INTRODUCTION

Page 4 ends

LEGEND
Applicable
Not Applicable
City Boundary
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of the Multi-Family Residential and Mixed-Use Objective Design Standards is to comply with requirements under the Housing Accountability Act, including SB 35 and SB 330 by providing clear and effective standards for the development of high-quality multi-family housing and mixed-use projects. The standards aim to remove barriers to revitalization and reinvestment through context-sensitive and objective rules. Per SB 35 and SB 330, an "objective design standard" means:
...a design standard that involves no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and is uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official before submittal of an application.

B. APPLICABILITY
The Multi-Family Residential and Mixed-Use Objective Design Standards apply to all new and proposed multi-family residential and mixed-use developments located in zones that allow two or more residential units and mixed-use, and are eligible for streamlined, ministerial processing under the Housing Accountability Act, including SB 35 and SB 330.

Eligible projects must include, but not limited to, multi-family projects with two or more units or mixed-use projects with at least two-thirds of the square footage of the development designated for residential use. Furthermore, these standards are applicable to eligible properties located outside of the Downtown Specific Plan, per the map below. In addition to the objective development standards in this document, projects must also comply with applicable development standards in the San Dimas Municipal Code (SDMC). In the event where a conflict occurs between objective development standards and those in the SDMC, the more restrictive standard will apply.

FIG. I: AREA OF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL & MIXED-USE OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
DRAFT

Page 806 ends

Page 5 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
II. Site Design Standards
DRAFT

Page 807 ends

SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

Page 6 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
A. PARKING LOCATION & DESIGN
All parking lots shall be designed in compliance with the applicable standards contained in Chapter 18.156 Vehicle Parking and Storage of the City of San Dimas Municipal Code, except as modified by the following:

1. Parking shall not be located between the building frontage and a public sidewalk.

2. No parking space shall require the vehicle to backup within the first 20 feet from the street right-of-way, parking lot entrance, or parking lot exit.

3. The first twenty feet of the primary driveway, as measured from the property line into the property, or an appropriate termination (i.e. end of planter), whichever is greater, shall consist of pavers or concrete that is colored, stamped, or textured.

4. For mixed-use developments, parking for the residential uses shall be provided and maintained separate and secure from the on-site commercial/ public parking.

5. Garage Entry Design
a. Parking garage entrances shall be designed as doorways or gateways that are consistent with the design of the rest of the building. (Fig. II.A.1) b. Garage doors and gates shall be recessed at least 12-24 inches from the adjacent wall plane.
c. The minimum separation between the garage entrances of two adjacent buildings shall be 10 feet.
d. Parking entrances shall be placed to avoid existing street trees, utilities infrastructure. New driveways providing access to corner lots shall be located as close to the property line away from the corner as possible.

6. Parking garages located more than 5 feet above the sidewalk level shall be lined with usable space at least 12 feet in depth. Not more than 25 percent of the parking garage shall be visible from the street.

7. Landscaping in Surface Parking Lots
a. A minimum of one shade tree shall be provided for every 6 parking spaces.
b. Parking areas shall have a continuous landscape strip along at least 50 percent of their perimeter. The minimum width of this landscape strip shall be 5 feet of interior clear planting space when no parking overhangs into the planter. When parking overhangs on one side, the minimum dimension shall be 6 feet of clear planting space. This parking strip shall be allowed to be interrupted by walkways that access the building. (Fig. II.A.2)
c. The minimum dimension of landscaped areas or planters at the end of a row of parking spaces shall be 7 feet wide and in between two parking spaces shall be 8 feet wide. (Fig. II.A.3)
d. No more than 6 parking spaces shall be located consecutively in one row without being separated by a landscaped area.
e. Planting areas shall be bounded by 6-inch concrete curbs.

FIG. II.A.3: LANDSCAPED PARKING
A planted area located between parking stalls provides
space for canopy trees to shade cars and reduce the
parking lot's heat island effect.

FIG. II.A.2: LANDSCAPED PARKING
The planted area between parking rows is designed as a
sustainable bioswale, which absorbs water run-off.

SOURCE: RICHIE DIESTERHEFT (CC BY-SA 2.0) (EDITED)
FIG. II.A.1: PARKING GARAGE ENTRY
This garage is designed as an artistic doorway.

DRAFT

Page 808 ends

SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

Page 7 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
f. All landscaping shall be maintained in a disease-free state. g. Parking lots at the side of buildings facing a street shall be separated by a natural or architectural barrier, such as walls or shrub plantings, that are a minimum height of 3 feet from the adjacent grade. Driveways and walkways are permitted to interrupt this barrier. (Fig II.A.4) h. Landscape materials shall consist of native California and droughttolerant material complying with the City of San Dimas Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO).
i. Trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallon. Shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gallon. Ground cover shall be one (1) gallon or flats.
j. All areas not covered with plant material shall be covered with 3-inch high mulch or decomposed granite.
k. Landscaping shall be maintained by an electric remote control automatic sprinkler or drip-irrigation system.

8. Bicycle Parking
a. Multi-family residential projects shall provide 0.2 racks per unit, with a minimum of 1 two-bicycle capacity rack.
b. Mixed-Use projects shall provide:
i. Short term parking: 5% of vehicle parking, with a minimum of 1 two-bicycle capacity rack.
ii. Long term parking: Secure parking for 5% of vehicle parking, with a minimum of 1 two-bicycle capacity rack.
c. Bicycle parking shall be located on-site and within 100 feet of the building's principal entrance, or located within the building's parking garage within fifty (50) feet of an elevator. Bicycle parking shall not be visible from the sidewalk or any common open space within the building.

B . CIRCULATION

1. Pedestrian Circulation
a. All structures, entries, facilities, amenities, and parking areas shall be connected by private pedestrian circulation elements with a minimum width of 4 feet. (Fig. II.B.1)
b. Public or private pedestrian walkways shall connect to the public sidewalk along a street frontage.
c. Private pedestrian walkways shall be separated from driveways by a physical barrier of 6 inches or more in height or a raised planting strip. d. When unit entries face a driveway, pedestrian walkways shall be located between the drive aisle and the unit. The walkway shall connect to a public right-of-way without crossing a drive aisle.

2. Vehicle Circulation/Access
a. Sites with alley access shall provide parking access from the alley. (Fig. II.B.2)
b. Sites without alley access shall provide parking access from the primary FIG. II.A.4: PARKING AREA SCREENING
A planting strip and an articulated wall separate a
surface parking lot from the sidewalk.

FIG. II.B.1: CIRCULATION ELEMENT
A common corridor connects residential courtyards with
amenity spaces on the ground floor of a mixed-use
building.

FIG. II.B.2: ACCESS FROM ALLEY
Access to this building's parking garage is discretely
provided on a rear alley at the back of a building.

SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH
DRAFT

Page 809 ends

SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

Page 8 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
street via driveways located as close to the side property line as possible. c. Corner lots without alleys shall provide parking access from the side street, with driveways located as far from the street intersection as possible.
d. Parking lots within a single parcel shall be internally connected with shared driveways.

C. OPEN SPACE
Common and private open shall be provided as required by the San Dimas Municipal Code, except as modified by the following:

1. Common Open Space
a. The minimum dimension of a common open space in any direction shall be 20 feet.
b. Common open space shall satisfy the minimum requirements by providing at least one passive or active recreation amenity. (Fig. II.C.1) i. A passive recreation amenity is defined as: a picnic / BBQ area; a pet area / dog park; a courtyard /plaza; a roof deck.
ii. Each passive recreation amenity shall include a minimum capacity of 1 seat per 10 units and at least one of the following elements: a trellis, gas fire pit, BBQ, or permanently installed picnic table. iii. An active recreation amenity is defined as: a playground/tot lot; sport court/field; fitness area; swimming pool; clubhouse with kitchen; or a recreation hall.
c. Internal courtyards and common areas at the lowest habitable level of a building shall be connected to each other with covered or open-to-sky pedestrian walkways.
d. Common space excludes streets, vehicle parking areas, accessways, and distances between buildings of less than 10 feet. Required yard setbacks shall be included provided they are designed as usable open areas with a minimum depth of 10 feet.

2. Private Open Space
a. All private open space shall be directly accessible from the unit it serves. b. Any private open space at the lowest habitable level of a building shall have a minimum depth of 10 feet and a minimum area of 100 square feet. (Fig. II.C.2)
c. All private open space/balconies at the upper levels of a building shall have a minimum depth of 5 feet and a minimum area of 45 square feet. d. Ground floor patios shall be enclosed with a decorative block wall or fencing consistent with the building’s finish material. The minimum height of shall be 4 feet.

FIG. II.C.1: COMMON OPEN SPACE
This common open space includes seating and a water
feature to encourage a shared sense of ownership.

FIG. II.C.2: PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
This private patio is enclosed with landscape, and
provides open space as an outdoor living room.

DRAFT

Page 810 ends

SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

Page 9 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
D . ROOF DECKS

1. Roof decks shall comply with Section C (Open Space) of these Standards and count towards minimum open space requirements. (Fig. 11.D.1)

2. Roof deck materials, finishes, fixtures, and colors visible from the street – including trellises, railings, and walls – shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with the architectural language of the building.

E. LANDSCAPE

1. Landscape Requirements
a. All required yards, spaces between buildings, and open space shall be landscaped pursuant to an approved landscape plan in compliance with Section 18.14 Water-Efficient Landscapes of the City of San Dimas Municipal Code.
b. Artificial trees, shrubs, and plants are prohibited within any landscape area visible from the public right-of-way. Artificial turf may be used subject to compliance with Chapter 18.14 of the San Dimas Municipal Code.
c. Landscape materials shall consist of native California and droughttolerant material. (Fig. II.E.1) d. Landscaped Buffer: The following shall be provided along the edges of all interior lot lines that abut a single-family residential zoned lot or single-family use:
i. A decorative masonry wall per the fencing/wall requirements of these standards.
ii. The requirement for a decorative wall shall be waived if a decorative wall exists on adjacent lots.
iii. A 5-foot minimum wide landscaped buffer.
iv. A row of evergreen trees to screen views to and from the adjacent lots.
v. If an alley or street is between the subject site and the single-family zoned lot(s) the above-mentioned requirements are not required.

2. Hardscape Requirements
a. Paving materials used in yards, setbacks, common open space areas, walkways, and patios shall be allowed to include cast-in-place concrete, stamped concrete, concrete unit pavers, stone, brick, tile, aggregate recycled paving materials, and permeable paving materials. (Fig. II.E.2) b. Decomposed granite and recycled aggregate shall be retained at the edge by concrete, wood, steel, or recycled headers and designed to minimize transference of these materials onto adjacent streets, alleys, sidewalks, and the public right-of-way. (Fig. II.E.3)
c. Permeable paving materials shall be allowed to help reduce the impervious surface area of the site and minimize stormwater runoff.

FIG. II.E.2: PERMEABLE PAVERS
Bricks in a permeable setting bed are a sustainable
hardscape solution that minimize stormwater runoff.

FIG. II.E.1: NATIVE PLANTING
The landscaping in this garden is a combination of
native and climate-adapted plants.

SOURCE: ACES (CC0 1.0)
FIG. II.D.1: ROOF DECK AS OPEN SPACE
This rooftop terrace includes a trellis, planters, and fixed and permanent seating to define an 'outdoor room'.

SOURCE: ROBERT R. GIGLIOTTI (CC BY-SA 3.0)
FIG. II.E.3: AGGREGATE EDGE
This aggregate path is retained at the edge by a row
of cobbles
SOURCE: BREWBOOKS (CC BY-SA 2.0)
DRAFT

Page 811 ends

SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

Page 10 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
F. LIGHTING

1. Light fixtures on building facades visible from public streets shall be selected to be compatible with the style of the building.

2. Site lighting, including dusk-to-dawn lighting, shall be required in all parking areas, common open spaces, exterior service areas, and other areas used by pedestrians outside the building envelope. (Fig. II.F.1)

3. Light posts for surface parking or residential pedestrian walkways shall not exceed 14 feet in height. Wall pack lights are prohibited. (Fig. II.F.2)

4. Site lighting shall be directed downward and shielded to prevent upward light pollution. (Fig. II.F.3)

5. Site lighting shall not spill into residential units or adjacent lots or create offsite glare shall be prohibited.

6. Site lighting shall emit a white light that renders true colors. Sodium vapor, or other lights casting a colored glow, shall not be used. This standard does not apply to colored accent lighting for special building elements, signs, or landscape or water features.

G . WALLS & FENCES

1. Perimeter and property line walls shall consist of decorative concrete masonry unit (CMU) with a stucco finish, brick, or stone veneer, slump stone, or split face with pre-cast concrete, block, stone or brick trim cap.

Interior walls, fences, and gates shall consist of wrought iron, wood, plastic/ wood composites, brick and stone materials. Unfinished concrete masonry unit (CMU), chain link fences, barbed wire, razor wire, electric wire, and similar wire types are prohibited at all conditions.

2. Walls and fences shall be compatible with the style of the building.

3. Both sides of all perimeter walls and fences shall be architecturally treated, with the exception of trash enclosures. The interior of the trash enclosures shall be painted with high durability paint.

4. Walls at the ground plane shall be finished with a pre-cast concrete, stone, or brick trim cap.

5. Retaining walls within the primary or side street setback area shall be constructed of cast in place concrete or concrete masonry unit (cmu) with a stucco, brick, or stone finish and shall be compatible with the building's finish.

FIG. II.F.2: PROHIBITED LIGHTING
Wall Pack lights on building facades are prohibited.

FIG. II.F.1: SITE LIGHTING
Lanterns illuminate a walking path.

FIG. II.G.1: PERIMETER WALLS
The property-line walls enhance the architectural
character and serve an additional function as planters.

FIG. II.F.3: DOWNWARD LIGHTING
Low profile lanterns direct light downwards to reduce
light pollution on site.

DRAFT

Page 812 ends

SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

Page 11 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
H. UTILITIES, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT &

S E RV I C E A R E A S

1. Utilities - All new utilities on a site shall be installed underground from the nearest service connection off-site. Any on-site service pole(s) that service the subject site shall be removed and the lines redirected underground to a service connection off-site. Adjacent utility poles located within/along the property frontage shall be removed and the service lines redirected underground to the nearest service pole off-site not directly adjacent to the subject site.

2. Mechanical Equipment
a. Mechanical equipment regardless of location shall be screened from pedestrian view. (Fig. II.H.1)
b. Mechanical equipment on roofs shall be located on flat portions of the roof or on pitched roofs that provide an equipment well. c. Rooftop screens shall be fully opaque. Mechanical equipment shall not exceed the height of adjacent parapet walls, equipment wells, or screens. (Fig. II.H.2)
d. Mechanical equipment located at ground level shall not be located between the building and the public right-of-way.
e. Heaters and air conditioning units shall not be installed within window openings. Exterior ducting is prohibited.
f. Air intake and exhaust systems that generates noise, smoke, or odors shall be vented to the roof or to the ceilings of covered balconies. g. Garage air exhaust systems shall not be located within 10 feet of the primary street property line or on any common open spaces. h. Mechanical equipment serving an individual unit may be placed within that unit's private open space.
i. All flashing, sheet metal vents, exhaust fans / ventilators, and similar equipment shall be painted to match the nearest building wall.

3. Electrical Equipment.
a. Electrical equipment located on a rooftop shall be screened from pedestrian view. Rooftop screens shall be fully opaque. Electrical equipment shall not exceed the height of adjacent parapet walls, equipment wells, or screens.
b. Electrical equipment located at ground level shall be screened from pedestrian view by a natural or architectural barrier, such as walls or shrub plantings, and meet the requirements of the utility provider. c. All wall-mounted utility elements shall be located to ensure they are concealed from pedestrian view.

FIG. II.H.2: SCREENING FROM ROOF
This mechanical equipment is screened from view in a
roof well with a low parapet wall.

FIG. II.H.1: SCREENING ALONG ALLEY
This wall provides an attractive screen for equipment
located on the ground level.

DRAFT

Page 813 ends

SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

Page 12 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
FIG. II.H.4: TRASH ENCLOSURE
This trash enclosure is built with CMU blocks, mesh
screen, and covered by an corrugated metal.

4. Service Areas
a. Access to service areas of buildings and sites shall be provided as follows:
i. Service entrances, waste disposal areas, and other similar service areas shall be screened from view regardless of location on site. (Fig.

II.H.2)
ii. For lots with alley access, service entrances, waste disposal areas, and other similar service areas shall be located adjacent to and accessed from the alley. (Fig. II.H.3)
iii. When an alley is not present, service entrances, waste disposal areas, and other similar service areas shall not be located within the front setback. They shall be located at least 20 feet behind the primary building face. On corner lots, the service entrance shall not be located along the same side of a building as its primary entrance.

5. Trash Enclosures
a. Trash, recycling, organic waste, and green waste bins and dumpsters shall be housed in a covered refuse enclosure with a gate that screens the trash receptacles. Sizing of the enclosures shall conform to solid waste provider requirements. (Fig. II.H.4)
b. Trash enclosures shall be finished with the same primary wall material and color as the nearest building within the development and shall comply with the City of San Dimas Standard.
c. Trash enclosures shall have both a vehicular access gate with a concrete apron, and a pedestrian entrance. Gates shall be opaque. Access shall conform to solid waste provider requirements.
d. Trash enclosures shall include interior dusk to dawn lighting for safety and security.

FIG. II.H.3: SERVICE AREA
This service area is accessed from the alley.

DRAFT

Page 814 ends

Page 13 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
III. Building Design Standards
DRAFT

Page 815 ends

BUILDING DESIGN

Page 14 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
A. BUILDING ENTRIES

1. All ground floors shall be accessed from the sidewalk of the primary street.

Ground floor residential and commercial units shall be directly accessible from a street or via common areas such as paseos, courtyards, and active landscape areas.

2. 3.

Entranceways and doorways shall be clearly identifiable as prominent points of access into buildings. (Fig. III.A.1)
Residential unit entrances directly accessed from a public right-of-way shall be covered.
a. The minimum depth of coverage shall be the length of the door outswing plus 12 inches. b. Coverage shall be achieved by recessing the entrance or projecting an awning overhead. A combination of both shall be allowed to meet this requirement provided both of the following conditions are satisfied:
i. The recession depth is a minimum of 6 inches.
ii. The awning depth is a minimum of 18 inches.

4. Secondary storefront and lobby entrances shall be allowed on rear and interior side facades.

5. Upper-floor uses shall be accessed through an exterior stair, interior stair, or lobby. Exterior stairs leading to upper floor shall not discharge people directly onto the sidewalk. Exterior stairs leading to upper floors shall face interior spaces, such as paseos, courtyards, and active landscape areas.

6. Residential and commercial entrances for Mixed-Use developments may be located on the same elevation, but shall be separated and differentiated from each other through design or use of different materials. Work-live units may have one main entry for both the residential and commercial component. (Fig. III.A.2)

7. Exterior security gates shall be allowed at one end of a semi-open corridor, paseo, or passage. Exterior gates shall be have at least 75 percent transparency. (Fig. III.A.1)
B . BUILDING PLACEMENT / SITING

1. Corner lots may be designed with a convex or a concave building corner. In either case, the walls comprising the building corner shall have active ground floors and windows above. (Figs. III.B.1-2)

2. On sites with more than one public corner, at least one building corner shall be designed convex.

3. Street-facing facades shall be parallel to the right-of-way, for a minimum of 75% of the street face.

FIG. III.B.2: CONCAVE CORNER
This concave corner creates space for a small retail court at the ground floor.

FIG. III.A.1: PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
The main entrance to this multi-family building is
prominent passage protected by a decorative security gate.

FIG. III.B.1: CONVEX CORNER
This convex corner is accentuated by a tower in addition to pilasters.

FIG. III.A.2: MIXED-USE ENTRANCES
An arched zaguan distinguishes a shared residential
entrance from commercial storefronts of this facade.

SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH
DRAFT

Page 816 ends

BUILDING DESIGN

Page 15 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
C. MASSING & ARTICULATION

1. Massing
a. For buildings three stories in height - The third floor shall step back on all sides facing a public right-of-way or parking lot unless, the elevation(s) faces another windowless building facade or alley or freeway. The step back shall be a minimum of 10 feet from front face of the first/second floor.
b. For building four stories or more - The fourth floor and all floors above the fourth floor shall step back on all sides facing a public right-of-way or parking lot unless, the elevation(s) faces another windowless building facade or alley or freeway. The step back shall be a minimum of 10 feet from front face of the third floor. (Fig. III.C.1)
c. Recessed architectural elements or spaces, such as porches, covered passages, and balconies, into the plane of the façade shall be a minimum of 5 feet in depth.
d. Projecting architectural elements, such as bay windows, cantilevered rooms and/or awnings, shall not project more than 48 inches from the main façade.

2. Articulation
a. The facade of any individual building more than 100 feet in length shall be modulated forward or backward from the predominant facade plane for a minimum depth of 4 feet and for a minimum length of 20 feet. At least one modulation shall be provided for every 50-foot length of the predominant building facade plane. (Fig. III.C.2)
b. The facade of any individual building up to 100 feet in length shall be required to provide one of the following, a break in roofline articulation or a projecting element that is at least the length of one third the building facade.
c. See III.D. Roof Design for the corresponding requirements for rooflines.

3. Facade Differentiation
a. Individual buildings that are over 150 feet in length shall have the facade designed as at least two distinct building increments with differing material and/or color combinations on each building increment.

4. Floor Level Articulation
a. A building's first story shall be differentiated from the floors above by at least one of the following (Fig. III.C.3):
(a) Continuous horizontal articulation between the first-floor door / window header height and the second-floor window sill height (such as a cornice or belt course or wainscot.
(b) Distinct exterior cladding, a material change, or a color change from upper floors.
(c) Larger window openings, such as storefronts.
b. The eaves of sloped roofs shall be differentiated by exposed rafters or a soffit that differs materially from the wall surface and fascia cover.

FIG. III.C.2: FACADE MODULATION
The length of this building facade is broken up by
modulations in the predominant facade plane.

FIG. III.C.1: UPPER-STORY STEPBACKS
The fourth story of this building steps back to respect the prevailing height of existing buildings on this street.

FIG. III.C.3: FLOOR LEVEL ARTICULATION
This mixed-use building differentiates the ground floor with large gallery openings and a cornice.

DRAFT

Page 817 ends

BUILDING DESIGN

Page 16 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
D. ROOF DESIGN

1. Roofline Articulation
a. Roofline articulation shall correspond to the facade modulations required by Section III.C.2.a. of these Standards. Roofline articulation is defined as one of the following techniques:
i. A change in parapet or roof height of a minimum 4 feet. ii. The inclusion of dormers, gables, and/or a change in cornice profile.

2. Roof style shall be consistent throughout. Pitched roofs shall consist of one primary slope, with allowance to deviate for architectural elements such as towers and rotundas. (Fig. III.D.1)

3. Parapet Design
a. Parapets shall be capped with coping, capped precast, continuous banding, projecting cornice or similar design, and shall be consistent with the building’s architectural style. All coping shall provide a minimum one inch projection from the exterior face of the parapet wall. b. Sheet metal coping shall comply with the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors’ National Association standards.

E. ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS/DETAILS

1. Balconies, patios and porches
a. All ground floor residential units shall include a patio, porch, or stoop.

2. Balcony
a. Balconies shall have a minimum depth of 5 feet and a minimum area of 45 square feet.
b. Balcony design character, palette of materials, and approach to detailing shall be consistent with the building's style. (Fig. III.E.1) c. Balconies of traditionally-styled buildings shall have visible supports in the form of projecting beams or braces.

3. Bay Window
a. Bay windows shall be a maximum of 5 feet wide. (Fig. III.E.2) b. Bay windows shall be placed a minimum of 2 feet from any building corner and a minimum of 3 feet from any other bay window. Bay windows are permitted on building corners when incorporated as part of a turret.
c. Bay windows shall consist of at least 75% transparent fenestration.

4. Awnings
a. Ground floor
i. Awnings shall be of a simple shed form, made of code-compliant fire-resistant and water-repellent canvas or materials of similar appearance and performance. (Fig. III.E.3)
ii. Each awning shall correspond to a storefront.

FIG. III.E.1: BALCONIES
Wrought-iron Juliet balconies with supporting brackets
on a traditional style building.

FIG. III.E.3: AWNINGS
Awnings provide an opportunity to give distinct character to storefronts.

FIG. III.E.2: BAY WINDOWS
A traditionally detailed bay window.

SOURCE: RICKY LEONG (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
FIG. III.D.1: ROOFLINE ARTICULATION
The use of dormers articulates this building's roofline creating a distinct character.

DRAFT

Page 818 ends

BUILDING DESIGN

Page 17 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
iii. Awnings shall not obstruct building signage.
iv. Awning color(s) and pattern(s) shall be coordinated with the overall design of the building. Awning colors shall be allowed to vary between adjacent businesses.
v. Internally illuminated and backlit awnings and any associated light diffusers are permitted on the ground floor.
vi. The minimum projection of an awning, measured from the face of the building, shall be 4 feet and the maximum projection shall not be more than 10 feet.
b. Upper floor
i. Signage is prohibited on upper floor awnings.
ii. Internally illuminated and backlit awnings and any associated light diffusers are prohibited on upper floors.

5. Canopy
a. Canopies shall not be cantilevered without secondary structural supports. Canopies shall be supported from below by metal brackets, or suspended from above by rods, wires, or chains that affix to the wall. b. Canopies shall be allowed to extend across multiple storefronts. c. Canopies shall not obstruct signage.
d. Signage is prohibited on upper floor canopies.
e. All canopies on a single building increment shall be consistent in their design, color, and material. (Fig. III.E.4)
f. The minimum projection of a canopy, measured from the face of the building, shall be 3 feet and the maximum projection shall not be more than 5 feet.

6. Cantilevered Rooms
a. A cantilevered room shall be a maximum of 20 feet wide. b. Cantilevered rooms shall be placed a minimum of 10 feet from any other cantilevered room.
c. Cantilevered rooms of traditional style buildings shall be supported by brackets, extended beams, or other elements that project from the underside of the volume. (Fig. III.E.5)
d. Cantilevered rooms shall not project more than 48 inches.

7. Stoops
a. The maximum height of a stoop shall be 3.5 feet from the level of the adjacent grade. (Fig. III.E.6)
b. Stoops shall be provided as primary frontage elements to transition from the public right-of-way to the entrance of a ground floor unit. Their material and design shall be consistent with that of the building. c. Stoops shall be a minimum depth of 4 feet and width of 6 feet. d. The landing shall be allowed to be covered or uncovered.

8. Mixed-use commercial storefront
a. Minimum ground floor ceiling height shall be 12 feet clear measured from face of finished ceiling to finish floor.

FIG. III.E.5: CANTILEVERED ROOMS
A second-floor room with supporting beams below
projects out from the facade
FIG. III.E.6: STOOPS
Elevated stoops transition the public realm into the
private realm of individual residences.

FIG. III.E.4: CANOPY
Canopies provide shade and raincover along the
sidewalks.

DRAFT

Page 819 ends

BUILDING DESIGN

Page 18 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
b. Storefront glass shall be clear without reflective coating or dark tinting.

Interior perforated shades shall be permitted.
c. Storefronts shall be illuminated so building signage is legible at night. d. Interior display lights shall be installed in all storefront display windows along the public right of way and remain on at night to create visual interest and promote safe space along sidewalks/walkways. e. Doors shall match the materials, design, and character of the display window framing.
f. At least 60 percent of ground-floor street-facing walls shall include transparent glazing. (Fig. III.E.7)
g. The header height for all openings on any commercial ground floor shall be a minimum of 10 feet and may be composed of windows, doors, and transom windows.
h. Doors and windows on any commercial ground floor with a minimum of 6 feet in width shall use transom windows.
i. The primary street-facing entry shall be differentiated by including one of the following: canopy or awning; change in roofline; tower; recessed entry; material change.
j. Roll-down security doors shall not be permitted on the exterior side of storefronts. Security gates are permitted on the interior side provided they provide at least seventy-five percent transparency.

9. Windows and Doors
a. One primary window style and material shall be used throughout an individual building.
b. Windows with an exterior vinyl finish are prohibited. c. Extruded aluminum windows without exterior cladding are prohibited. d. Window and door materials shall be wood, fiberglass, steel, or aluminum with exterior cladding.
e. Windows shall be allowed with muntin patterns and colors appropriate to the building’s architectural style.
f. Windows and doors shall either be trimmed or recessed. i. When trimmed, the trim material shall not be less than 3 ½ inches in width by ¾ inches in depth as measured from the face of the exterior wall finish. Head casing shall be a minimum ½ inch wider than jamb casing. Foam trim molding is prohibited on the ground floor. (Fig. III.E.8)
ii. All doors and windows shall be recessed a minimum of 2 inches as measured from the face of the exterior wall finish. The finish material shall wrap the corner and extend into the opening to the exterior face of the door or window. The depth of casing shall not contribute to the minimum recess requirement. (Fig. III.E.9) FIG. III.E.9: RECESSED DOORS
Ground floor commercial entrances are recessed inside
arches at this mixed-use project.

FIG. III.E.8: WINDOW TRIM
This Craftsman style window trim includes head casing
on the top that is wider than the jamb casing on the sides.

FIG. III.E.7: FIRST FLOOR TRANSPARENCY
The ground floor of this mixed-use building features
more glazing than the upper story.

DRAFT

Page 820 ends

BUILDING DESIGN

Page 19 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
iii. Windows shall be recessed in a manner that is authentic to the building’s architectural style.
(a) In mediterranean style buildings, doors and windows at the ground floor shall be recessed a minimum of 4 inches as measured from the face of the exterior wall finish. The finish material shall wrap the corner and extend into the opening to the exterior face of the door or window. The depth of casing shall not contribute to the minimum recess requirement. (b) In craftsman, colonial, and victorian style buildings, doors and windows shall be recessed a minimum of 2 inches as measured from the face of the exterior wall finish. The finish material shall wrap the corner and extend into the opening to the exterior face of the door or window. The depth of casing shall not contribute to the minimum recess requirement.
g. Residential glazing shall not be tinted beyond what is required for compliance with energy efficiency requirements set by Title 24. h. The width of each paired shutter shall be equal to one-half the width of the window opening; unpaired single shutters shall be the same width of the adjacent window opening.

F. C O LO R S & MATERIALS

1. Buildings shall have a color palette that consists of a body color and an accent color (not including roof color).

2. Projects with 2 or more residential buildings shall include a minimum of 2 body colors and shall not use a single body color on more than 75 percent of the residential structures. (Fig. III.F.1)
G. ARCHITECTURAL CONSISTENCY

1. Materials
a. Buildings shall incorporate a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 exterior wall finish materials on each building elevation. Trim does not count as the second material.
b. The following materials shall be prohibited as exterior finishes: T1-11; vinyl siding; unfinished concrete masonry block.
c. All exterior brick cladding shall be composed of individual brick size modules. (Fig. III.G.1)
d. All panel cladding is prohibited.
e. Masonry veneer walls shall be detailed in a manner that expresses the structural integrity of real masonry. Stone material shall not be painted; brick may be painted. (Fig. III.G.2)
FIG. III.F.1: BUILDING COLORS
The two residential buildings comprising this project are differentiated by distinct yet complementary colors.

FIG. III.G.2: MATERIAL CHANGE
A change in material from masonry to stucco delineates
a shift from ground-floor commercial to upper-story
residential in this mixed-use building.

FIG. III.G.1: INDIVIDUAL BRICK
This building uses a veneer of individual bricks and
traditional detailed coursing for headers and cornices.

DRAFT

Page 821 ends

BUILDING DESIGN

Page 20 ends

Multi-Family Residential & Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
City of San Dimas, California
f. Exterior wood shall be painted, or of a cedar or redwood species with a clear finish.
g. Metal flashing shall be painted to match the building finish.

2. Changes in materials and colors shall occur along horizontal lines or at internal building corners only. Material changes at outside corners shall be prohibited. When the span to an inside corner is 25 feet or more, the change in material and colors shall wrap around the corner of the building and extend a minimum of 6 feet beyond the corner, or terminate at the nearest window or door.

DRAFT

Page 822 ends

Senate Bill No. 330
CHAPTER 654
An act to amend Section 65589.5 of, to amend, repeal, and add Sections 65940, 65943, and 65950 of, to add and repeal Sections 65905.5, 65913.10, and 65941.1 of, and to add and repeal Chapter 12 (commencing with Section 66300) of Division 1 of Title 7 of, the Government Code, relating to housing. [Approved by Governor October 9, 2019. Filed with Secretary of State October 9, 2019.]
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 330, Skinner. Housing Crisis Act of 2019.
(1) The Housing Accountability Act, which is part of the Planning and Zoning Law, prohibits a local agency from disapproving, or conditioning approval in a manner that renders infeasible, a housing development project for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or an emergency shelter unless the local agency makes specified written findings based on a preponderance of the evidence in the record. The act specifies that one way to satisfy that requirement is to make findings that the housing development project or emergency shelter is inconsistent with both the jurisdiction’s zoning ordinance and general plan land use designation as specified in any element of the general plan as it existed on the date the application was deemed complete. The act requires a local agency that proposes to disapprove a housing development project that complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria that were in effect at the time the application was deemed to be complete, or to approve it on the condition that it be developed at a lower density, to base its decision upon written findings supported by substantial evidence on the record that specified conditions exist, and places the burden of proof on the local agency to that effect. The act requires a court to impose a fine on a local agency under certain circumstances and requires that the fine be at least $10,000 per housing unit in the housing development project on the date the application was deemed complete.

This bill, until January 1, 2025, would specify that an application is deemed complete for these purposes if a preliminary application was submitted, as described below.

Existing law authorizes the applicant, a person who would be eligible to apply for residency in the development or emergency shelter, or a housing organization to bring an action to enforce the Housing Accountability Act.

If, in that action, a court finds that a local agency failed to satisfy the requirement to make the specified findings described above, existing law requires the court to issue an order or judgment compelling compliance with the act within 60 days, as specified.
88 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AUTHENTICATED

ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 823 ends

This bill, until January 1, 2025, would additionally require a court to issue the order or judgment previously described if the local agency required or attempted to require certain housing development projects to comply with an ordinance, policy, or standard not adopted and in effect when a preliminary application was submitted.

Existing law authorizes a local agency to require a housing development project to comply with objective, quantifiable, written development standards, conditions, and policies appropriate to, and consistent with, meeting the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need, as specified.

This bill, until January 1, 2025, would, notwithstanding those provisions or any other law and with certain exceptions, require that a housing development project only be subject to the ordinances, policies, and standards adopted and in effect when a preliminary application is submitted, except as specified.
(2) The Planning and Zoning Law, except as provided, requires that a public hearing be held on an application for a variance from the requirements of a zoning ordinance, an application for a conditional use permit or equivalent development permit, a proposed revocation or modification of a variance or use permit or equivalent development permit, or an appeal from the action taken on any of those applications. That law requires that notice of a public hearing be provided in accordance with specified procedures.

This bill, until January 1, 2025, would prohibit a city or county from conducting more than 5 hearings, as defined, held pursuant to these provisions, or any other law, ordinance, or regulation requiring a public hearing, if a proposed housing development project complies with the applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards in effect at the time an application is deemed complete, as defined. The bill would require the city or county to consider and either approve or disapprove the housing development project at any of the 5 hearings consistent with the applicable timelines under the Permit Streamlining Act.
(3) The Permit Streamlining Act, which is part of the Planning and Zoning Law, requires each state agency and each local agency to compile one or more lists that specify in detail the information that will be required from any applicant for a development project. That law requires the state or local agency to make copies of this information available to all applicants for development projects and to any persons who request the information.

The bill, until January 1, 2025, for purposes of any state or local law, ordinance, or regulation that requires a city or county to determine whether the site of a proposed housing development project is a historic site, would require the city or county to make that determination, which would remain valid for the pendency of the housing development, at the time the application is deemed complete, except as provided. The bill, until January 1, 2025, would also require that each local agency make copies of any above-described list with respect to information required from an applicant for a housing development project available both (A) in writing to those 88 Ch. 654 — 2 —

Page 824 ends

persons to whom the agency is required to make information available and (B) publicly available on the internet website of the local agency.

The Permit Streamlining Act requires public agencies to approve or disapprove of a development project within certain timeframes, as specified.

The act requires a public agency, upon its determination that an application for a development project is incomplete, to include a list and a thorough description of the specific information needed to complete the application.

Existing law authorizes the applicant to submit the additional material to the public agency, requires the public agency to determine whether the submission of the application together with the submitted materials is complete within 30 days of receipt, and provides for an appeal process from the public agency’s determination. Existing law requires a final written determination by the agency on the appeal no later than 60 days after receipt of the applicant’s written appeal.

This bill, until January 1, 2025, would provide that a housing development project, as defined, shall be deemed to have submitted a preliminary application upon providing specified information about the proposed project to the city or county from which approval for the project is being sought.

The bill would require each local agency to compile a checklist and application form that applicants for housing development projects may use for that purpose and would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to adopt a standardized form for applicants seeking approval from a local agency that has not developed its own application form. After the submittal of a preliminary application, the bill would provide that a housing development project would not be deemed to have submitted a preliminary application under these provisions if the development proponent revises the project such that the number of residential units or square footage of construction changes by 20% or more until the development proponent resubmits the information required by the bill so that it reflects the revisions. The bill would require a development proponent to submit an application for a development project that includes all information necessary for the agency to review the application under the Permit Streamlining Act within 180 days of submitting the preliminary application.

The bill, until January 1, 2025, would require the lead agency, as defined, if the application is determined to be incomplete, to provide the applicant with an exhaustive list of items that were not complete, as specified.

The Permit Streamlining Act generally requires that a public agency that is the lead agency for a development project approve or disapprove a project within 120 days from the date of certification by the lead agency of an environmental impact report prepared for certain development projects, but reduces this time period to 90 days from the certification of an environmental impact report for development projects meeting certain additional conditions relating to affordability. Existing law defines “development project” for these purposes to mean a use consisting of either residential units only or mixed-use developments consisting of residential and nonresidential uses that satisfy certain other requirements.
88 — 3 — Ch. 654

Page 825 ends

San Dimas City CouncilDecember 10, 2024

San Dimas City Council
December 10, 2024