San Dimas City Council
October 28, 2025

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY OCTOBER 28, 2025 7:00 PM
SAN DIMAS COUNCIL CHAMBER
245 EAST BONITA AVENUE
A public agenda packet is available for review on the City’s website  www.sandimasca.gov or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected].

Members of the public may observe the City Council meeting live on the City of San Dimas website at www.sandimasca.gov or on KWST Channel 3. To view from the website, select the Watch City Council Meetings blue button from the home page.
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmember Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna
CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE

RECOGNITION

1. Recognize Red Ribbon Week October 23 ­ 31, 2025

2. Recognize San Dimas Youth Softball as USA Softball National Participants

3. Recognize Lowe’s Home Improvement Stores “Red Vest Day” ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the audience are invited to address the City Council on any item on this agenda or not on this agenda. Public comment will not be taken during each individual agenda item, except for public hearing items. Comments on public hearing items will be heard when that item is scheduled for discussion. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from engaging in discussion on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. However, your concerns may be referred to staff or set for discussion at a later date. Each speaker will be limited to speaking once for up to (3) three minutes.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council requests separate discussion.) CC1. Adopt Resolution 2025­53, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for the Warrant Register of October 15, 2025 in the Amount of $306,529.02.

CC2. Approve Minutes of the October 14, 2025 City Council Study Session and October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting.

three minutes.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council requests separate discussion.) CC1. Adopt Resolution 2025­53, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for the Warrant Register of October 15, 2025 in the Amount of $306,529.02.

CC2. Approve Minutes of the October 14, 2025 City Council Study Session and October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting.

CC3. Receive and file the September 2025 Investment Report CC4. Approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the City of San Dimas for Distribution and Use of Measure A Local Solutions Funds and Approve an Expenditure and Offsetting Revenue Budget Appropriation in Fund 034 for Measure A Local Solutions Funds in an Amount not to Exceed $115,790 CC5. Adopt Ordinance 1332, Approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 25­05, a City­Initiated Municipal Code Text Amendment to Amend Title 18 Zoning, to Eliminate Chapter 18.188 Explosives from the Code.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: Approve consent calendar with recommendations as presented in staff reports.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
PH1. Approve Resolution 2025­55, Approving Tentative Tract Map 24­05 (84582), DPRB 24­14, and Tree Permit 24­28. A request to Approve the Subdivision, Filed under SB 330, of One (1) Existing Parcel into 19 New Parcels (TTM 84582) to be Developed with a Total of 37 Detached Two­story Single­family Residences, which Include Seven (7) Affordable Housing Units, and the Demolition of Two Residences, Garage, Barn, and the Associated Removal of 40 Mature Trees Located at 901 W. Covina Boulevard within the Single­Family 8,000 Zone (APN:
8385­006­027).

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff, the Development Plan Review Board, and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:

1.  Adopt Resolution 2025­55 (Attachment 1), approving DPRB Case No. 24­14 and TP 24­28, and finding the proposed project to be categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, In­Fill Development Projects.

Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:

2. Adopt Resolution 2025­55 (Attachment 1), approving TTM 24­05.

PH2. Adopt Ordinance 1331, Amending Specified Chapters of Title 15 of the San Dimas Municipal Code and Adopting by Reference, the 2025 Edition of the California Building Code, Volumes 1 & 2, Green Building Standards Code, Wildlife­Urban Interface Code, and the 2024 International Property Maintenance Code Together with Certain Amendments, Additions, Deletions, and Exceptions, Including Fees and Penalties.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1.  Conduct a public hearing and adopt Ordinance 1331 to adopt by reference the model

Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:

2. Adopt Resolution 2025­55 (Attachment 1), approving TTM 24­05.

PH2. Adopt Ordinance 1331, Amending Specified Chapters of Title 15 of the San Dimas Municipal Code and Adopting by Reference, the 2025 Edition of the California Building Code, Volumes 1 & 2, Green Building Standards Code, Wildlife­Urban Interface Code, and the 2024 International Property Maintenance Code Together with Certain Amendments, Additions, Deletions, and Exceptions, Including Fees and Penalties.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1.  Conduct a public hearing and adopt Ordinance 1331 to adopt by reference the model codes with various additions, deletions and additional administrative provisions.

PH3. Adopt Resolution 2025­54, Approving Waste Management’s Request to Adjust San Dimas Solid Waste Collection Rates for 2026
RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends that the City Council:

1.  Adopt Resolution 2025­54 to set solid waste rates effective from January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026. This action would continue year three of the five­year adjustment plan without requiring a Proposition 218 citywide mailer notification, provided the annual overall rate increase does not exceed 5%.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Members of the Audience (Speakers are limited to (3) minutes or as may be determined by the Chair.) CITY REPORTS
CR1. City Manager
CR2. City Attorney
CR3. Members of the City Council
Councilmembers’ Report on Meetings Attended at the Expense of the Local Agency (Pursuant to AB 1234 – G.C. §53232.3(d)
City Council Requests for Future Items, Comments and Updates

ADJOURNMENT
Notice Regarding Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need assistance to participate in a city meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 394­6216. Early notification before the meeting you wish to attend will make it possible for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102­35.104 ADA Title II].

Copies of documents distributed for the meeting are available in alternative formats upon request. Any writings or documents provided to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public review Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on Fridays from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Administration Department and San Dimas Library. In addition, most documents are posted on the City's website at www.sandimasca.gov.

Posting Statement:  I declare under penalty of perjury that on October 24, 2025, I posted a true and correct copy of this agenda on the bulletin board in the Civic Center Plaza of City Hall at 245 E. Bonita

at (909) 394­6216. Early notification before the meeting you wish to attend will make it possible for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102­35.104 ADA Title II].

Copies of documents distributed for the meeting are available in alternative formats upon request. Any writings or documents provided to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public review Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on Fridays from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Administration Department and San Dimas Library. In addition, most documents are posted on the City's website at www.sandimasca.gov.

Posting Statement:  I declare under penalty of perjury that on October 24, 2025, I posted a true and correct copy of this agenda on the bulletin board in the Civic Center Plaza of City Hall at 245 E. Bonita Ave.,San Dimas Library 145 N. Walnut Ave., San Dimas Post Office 300 E. Bonita Ave., Von’s Via Verde Shopping Center 1160 Via Verde Ave., and on the City's website www.sandimasca.gov/agendas­minutes/as required by law.

October 24, 2025 Debra Black
Debra Black, City Clerk

Red Ribbon Week
W
HEREAS, communities across America have been plagued by the numerous problems associated with illicit drug use and those that traffic in them; and W
HEREAS, there is hope in winning the war on drugs, and that hope lies in education and drug demand reduction, coupled with the hard work and determination of organizations such as the Southland Young Marines of the Marine Corps League to foster a healthy, drug free lifestyle; and W
HEREAS, governments and community leaders know that citizen support is one of the most effective tools in the effort to reduce the use of illicit drugs in our communities; and
W
HEREAS, the red ribbon has been chosen as a symbol commemorating the work of Enrique Kiki” Camarena, a Drug Enforcement Administration agent who was murdered in the line of duty, and represents the belief that one person can make a difference; and
W
HEREAS, the Red Ribbon Campaign was established by Congress in 1988 to encourage a drug-free lifestyle and involvement in drug prevention and reduction efforts; and
W
HEREAS, October 23- 31 has been designated National Red Ribbon Week, which encourages Americans to wear a red ribbon to show their support for a drug-free environment;
N
OW THEREFORE, I Mayor Emmett G. Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmembers Rachel Bratakos, Eric Nakano, Ryan A. Vienna do hereby proclaim October 23rd-31st, 2025 as RED RIBBON WEEK, during this event, urge all citizens to join with appropriate celebrations and observances.

I
N WITNESS THEREOF, I, Mayor Emmett G. Badar, have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of San Dimas to be affixed this 28thday of October, 2025.

Lowe’s “Red Vest Day”
The San Dimas City Council recognizes the following
Lowe’s Store Managers for their contributions to the
renovation of the historic San Dimas Mountain Rescue
Station:

Nam Nguyen. – San Dimas
Henry Duron – Riverside
Gary Norby – Chino Hills
Mark Harrison – Rancho Cucamonga
Nick Summers – Industry
Chad Sotello – Upland
Edward Ruiz – Anaheim
Doug Moore – Sales
Gabriel Pabon – Main
Matt Loera – Sr. Account Manager
Your stores are assets to our communities.

In Witness Thereof, I, Mayor Emmett G. Badar, have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of San Dimas to be affixed this 28th, day of October 2025.

RESOLUTION 2025-53

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING CERTAIN DEMANDS OCTOBER 30, 2025
WHEREAS, the following listed demands have been audited by the Director of Administrative Services; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services has certified as to the availability of funds for payment thereto; and
WHEREAS, the register of audited demands has been submitted to the City Council for approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Dimas does hereby approve Warrant Register of October 30, 2025 in the amount of $306,529.02.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 2025. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2025-53. It was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 28th, day of October, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

ACTION MINUTES
OCTOBER 14, 2025, 6:00 PM

STUDY SESSION
Council Members Present: Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmember Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna Staff: City Manager Brad McKinney, Assistant City Manager Travis Sais, Director of Public Works Shari Garwick, Director of Administrative Services Michael O’Brien, Director of Community Development Luis Torrico, Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Wasserman, City Attorney Jeff Malawy, City Clerk Debra Black
Call to Order: 6:03 PM

STUDY SESSION ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Discussion and Consideration of Fiscal
Year 2025-26 Community Survey
Desired Topics
The meeting discussion centered around the
community survey conducted in 2023, which
had a 3.7% margin of error. It was noted that
there is $40,000 in the Fiscal Year 2025-26
budget for a subsequent community survey,
which is why this item is coming before the
City Council. The 2023 survey, administered
to 679 adults, covered quality of life, city
services, public safety, homelessness,
priorities, public trust and service, sales tax,
communication and e-government. The
Council debated the frequency of surveys,
suggesting every four years instead of two.

They also discussed potential modifications,
such as focusing the survey on specific
neighborhood clusters. The meeting
concluded with a plan to revisit the topic of
conducting a community survey in Fiscal
Year 2026-27.

Approve Minutes of the October 14, 2025 City Council Study Session and October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting. Page 2
For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Future Action Items:
• Revisit the topic of conducting a
community survey in Fiscal Year
2026-27.
• Explore ways to make the survey
more targeted and useful, such as
gathering data by
neighborhood/district and including
questions about the Aquatics facility
and the A-Line station.

Adjourned: 6:51 P.M.

I, Debra Black, City Clerk attest that these draft minutes are accurate and reflective of the actions taken by the City Council.
________________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

ACTION MINUTES
OCTOBER 14, 2025, 7:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING
Council Members Present: Mayor Emmett Badar, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Weber, Councilmember Rachel Bratakos, Councilmember Eric Nakano, Councilmember Ryan A. Vienna Staff: City Manager Brad McKinney, Assistant City Manager Travis Sais, Director of Public Works Shari Garwick, Director of Administrative Services Michael O’Brien, Director of Community Development Luis Torrico, Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Wasserman, City Attorney Jeff Malawy, City Clerk Debra Black, Building Manager Garrett Tarango, Senior Planning Manager Marco Espinoza, Assistant Planner Yasmin Dabbous
Call to Order: 7:05 PM

CONSENT ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Adopt Resolution 2025-50, A Resolution
of the City Council of the City of San
Dimas, Approving Certain Demands for
the Pre-paid Warrant Register of
September 30, 2025, in the Amount of
$776,588.67 and Warrant Register of
October 15, 2025, in the Amount of
$844,550.59,

2. Approve Minutes of the September 23,
2025, Special Meeting and the
September 23, 2025, City Council
Meeting,

3. Approve Settlement of Claim Mayans v.

City of San Dimas CJP 3054681 and
CJP3054987,

4. Approve Resolution 2025-51 Authorizing
the Closure of City Hall, Recreation and
Senior Centers and Field Operations
aside from Emergency Work on
December 26,29,30, 2025 as well as
January 2, 2026.,

5. Award Construction Contract 2025-03
Catch Basin Full Trash Capture Insert
Installation Project to Oppenheimer
National in the Amount of $298,028.70;
Approve Project Budget of $342,733.01;
MOTION: Motion/seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Weber/Councilmember Vienna to
approve the consent calendar. Motion carried
5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

Approve Minutes of the October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting. Page 2 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Declare the Bid from United Storm
Water, Inc., to be non-responsive

6. Appropriate $264,600 From Measure M
Funds (Fund 76) and Approve Change
Order No. 1 in the Amount of $264,600
for Fifth Street Et Al - Street
Improvement Project (CC2025-04) to Aid
Paving on Iglesia Street, Including
Engineering and Contingency

OTHER BUSINESS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Introduce Ordinance 1331 A City-Initiated
Municipal Code Text Amendment to
Amend Specified Chapters of Title 15 of
the San Dimas Municipal Code (Buildings
and Construction) to Adopt By Reference
the 2025 Editions of: the California
Building Code Volumes 1 & 2, the
California Residential Code, the California
Plumbing Code, the California Electrical
Code, the California Mechanical Code, the
California Fire Code, the California
Wildland-Urban Interface Code, the
California Green Building Standards Code,
the 2024 International Property
Maintenance Code, Together with Certain
Amendments, Additions, Deletions, and
Exceptions, Including Fees and Penalties.

MOTION: Motion/seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Weber/Councilmember Bratakos to
introduce Ordinance 1331 and hold a public
hearing on October 28, 2025. Motion carried
5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2. Appoint a City Representative to the Board
of Trustees of the San Gabriel Valley
Mosquito and Vector Control District
MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Bratakos/ Mayor Pro Tem
Weber to appoint Councilmember Vienna to
the Board of Trustees of the San Gabriel
Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District
for a two-year term. Motion carried 5-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Introduce Ordinance 1332, A City-Initiated
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05,
Amending Title 18 Zoning, to Eliminate
Chapter 18.188 Explosives from the Code.

There were no public comments.

MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Vienna/Councilmember
Bratakos to introduce Ordinance 1332 and
hold a public hearing on October 28, 2025.

Motion carried 5-0.

Approve Minutes of the October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting. Page 3 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Vienna,
Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2. Approve Resolution 2025-52, A Resolution
of The City Council of the City of San
Dimas, County of Los Angeles, Approving
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24-04
(84663), General Plan Amendment 24-04,
Development Plan Review 24-13, Tree
Removal Permit 24-04; with an Associated
Affordable Housing Agreement; The
project is exempt under Government Code
Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines
151829(C) A Request to Approve a
Vesting Tract Map for Condominium
Purposes for the Development of 164
Units (Attached Two- and Three-stories),
17 of which will be Affordable Units
(Moderate-income); Amend the Housing
Element to Reallocate 89 Units Across
Affordability Levels from the Subject Site
to Seven (7) other Existing Housing Sites
(No’s 4, 5, 7, 9, 10b, 11, 12), Reduce the
Density of the Subject Site from 45-55
DUA to 16-25 DUA, and Create Two Sites
from Site #13 (13a & 13b); Development
Plan Review for the Architectural and Site
Layout Review, and the Associated
Removal of a Total of 116 Trees (80
Mature And 36 Non-mature Trees). The
Project Site is Located just East of 444 E.

Bonita Ave. (APN’s: 8390-016-008 &
8390-014-025)
City Clerk Black announced that the Council
received a letter of opposition to the project
that will be added to the official record of the
meeting.

City Attorney Malawy made an
announcement of Councilmember Vienna’s
conflict of interest on sites 4 and 5.

Councilmember Vienna left the Chamber at
8:28 P.M.

Public Comments:

Speaker #1 Doran Barnes spoke in support
of the project.

Speaker #2 John Ebiner spoke in opposition
of the project and submitted written comment.

Speaker #3 Patrick Jones spoke in support of
the project with a gate.

MOTION: Motion/seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Weber/Councilmember Nakano to
approve sites 4 and 5 with proposed changes
on table 4 of the staff report. Motion carried
4-0.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Nakano, Weber
No: None

Absent: None
Abstain: Vienna
Councilmember Vienna returned to the
Chamber at 8:44 P.M.

MOTION: Motion/seconded by
Councilmember Vienna/Mayor Pro Tem
Weber to approve Resolution 2025-52.

Motion carried 4-1 with Councilmember
Nakano in opposition.

Yes: Badar, Bratakos, Vienna, Weber
No: Nakano

Absent: None
Abstain: None

Approve Minutes of the October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting. Page 4 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025

CITY REPORTS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
a. City Manager City Manager McKinney provided updates on the following:
• East Fifth Street Community Meeting
will be held at the Senior Center,
October 15th at 6pm.
• San Dimas High School parade is
Friday, October 17th and road
closures in the downtown will be from
2- 5pm.
b. City Attorney Governor Newsom has signed Senate Bill (SB) 79, the Abundant & Affordable Homes
Near Transit Act. A small city exception
(population of 35,000 and below) was added
to the bill where restrictions will only apply
within a ¼ mile of the San Dimas A-Line
Station.
c. Members of the City Council
Reports on Meetings Attended AB 1234
(G.C. §53232.3(d))
Mayor Pro Tem Weber attended the League
of California Cities Conference.

Councilmember Bratakos attended the
League of California Cities Conference.

CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR

FUTURE ITEMS

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Study Session request by Councilmember
Bratakos supported by Mayor Pro Tem
Weber for discussion on the upcoming 2028
Olympics.

Study Session request by Councilmember
Bratakos supported by Councilmember
Nakano for discussion on inclusionary
zoning.

Adjourned: 10:17 P.M.

I, Debra Black, City Clerk attest that these draft minutes are accurate and reflective of the actions taken by the City Council.
________________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Michael O'Brien, Director of Administrative Services Subject: Receive and file the September 2025 Investment Report ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
Monthly Reporting for the City of San Dimas investment of idle funds and cash condition.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
• Receive and file the Investment and Cash Condition report for the month of September 2025.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
It is the policy of the City of San Dimas to invest public funds in a manner that will provide an optimal combination of security and investment return, while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all State and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.

The priority objectives of the City’s investment activities are as follows: Safety, liquidity and returns.

The City’s investment portfolio as of September 30, 2025 maintained liquid cash in the amount of $15,572,014.45 held between BMO Harris, the City and LAIF and the CALTRUST Liquidity Fund, which amounts to just over 20% of the portfolio to provide the cash flow necessary for City payroll

Receive and File the September 2025 Investment Report Page 2 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
and operating expenditures, as well as large capital project expenses and unforeseen emergencies that may occur throughout the year. The following chart displays the total investments and weighted average yield per investment category:

The City’s Banking Services Provider BMO Harris provides a fully collateralized checking account whose funds are used to make cash payments for City payroll and operational expenses. The city performs daily bank reconciliations to assure adequate cash is held in the checking account for upcoming expenditures. Cash held in the account earns income credits that accumulate at a rate of .75% which offsets banking service charges that are charged each quarter to the city. As of June 10, 2024, the City opened a collateralized money market account BMO Harris.

Petty Cash is held at City facilities for cashiering purposes and to reimburse small dollar expenditures between $0.01 and $50.00.

The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is considered a Local Agency Investment Pool and acts much like a money market account. Funds can be deposited and withdrawn without penalty.

The pool invests funds in short-term securities and can produce returns at rates like money markets but is considered more secure.

CALTRUST is a public agency that provides investment funds that are liquid, short term, and medium term. The assets held by CALTRUST are managed by State Street Global Advisors.

Since the City first invested with CALTRUST in August of 2010, buying into the Medium-Term Fund. The City has made various contributions throughout the years as well as reinvested any accumulated interest earnings throughout the life of the fund.

In total the weighted average cost of investing in CALTRUST is $9.99. Currently due to increasing interest rates driving market rates down for assets already held, the share price of the fund as of September30,2025 was $9.92. Until interest rates decline to the point that share price would increase to $9.99 or above, the City would be recognizing a loss on sale. However, the City could pull out funds at any time if liquidity needs arose.

WEIGHTED AVG.

YIELD TOTAL INVESTMENT

0.75% $1,196,240.96

3.91% $1,034,521.53

0.00% $2,640.00

4.34% $6,229,363.58

4.25% $7,109,248.38

3.95% $14,380,317.68
PRINCIPAL IN BROKER MONEY MARKET 0.00% $38,431.67

3.80% $29,990,763.80
WEIGHTED AVG.

YIELD TOTAL INVESTMENT

4.63% $8,344,237.18

4.70% $744,175.00

2.11% $2,814,492.50

0.00% $0.00

3.18% $1,482,000.00

4.45% $775,703.43

4.32% $277,068.00

2.89% $13,554,295.81

2.64% $737,350.00

3.65% $18,111,000.00

3.87% $46,840,321.92

3.86% $76,831,085.72

COLLATERALIZED, POOLED AND PUBLIC AGENCY INVESTMENTS

INVESTMENTS PURCHASED THROUGH BROKERS

TOTAL OF ALL COLLATERALIZED,POOLED AND PUBLIC AGENCY ACCOUNTS

CALTRUST INVESTMENT LIQUIDITY FUNDS

BMO HARRIS - MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT

TVI GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS

STIFEL NEGOTIABLE CD'S OF DEPOSIT

TOTAL BROKER ACCOUNTS

TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS

BMO HARRIS - GENERAL ACCOUNT

SAN DIMAS PETTY CASH - IMPREST FUNDS

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CA STATE TREASURER

CALTRUST INVESTMENT PROGRAM-MEDIUM TERM-SHARES

GREAT PACIFIC SECURITIES CORPORATE & MUNICIPAL BONDS

TVI CORPORATE BONDS
TVI U.S.TRESURY BILLS

TVI NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT

STIFEL GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS

STIFEL COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS

GREAT PACIFIC SECURITIES GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISE (GSE)

TVI COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS

Receive and File the September 2025 Investment Report Page 3 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Beginning in the month of December 2023, the City opened a liquid fund with CALTRUST, which is not subject to market rate adjustments due to the type of investments utilized. The fund yielded

4.32% for the month of June, out yielding LAIF by .11%. The City intends to take advantage of the high yielding short term investments until yields are no longer inverted.

The City Treasurer also utilizes Brokers to purchase investment securities such as Government Sponsored Enterprises (Agency Bonds), Corporate Bonds, U.S. Treasuries and Negotiable CD’s.

As investments get purchased a broker money marker will be used for the transition time between investments maturing and becoming available cash for reinvestments.

The investment policy and California Government Code Section 53600.3 allows the City to invest 30% of its portfolio in Certificates of Deposit and 20% of its portfolio in Corporate Bonds through Brokers. U.S. Treasuries and Government Sponsored Enterprises (Agency Bonds) have no investment limits; however, it is considered a best practice not to invest more than 5% in a single Government Sponsored Enterprises.

The following is a breakdown of the total invested in each type of investment along with its percentage of the portfolio:

Additionally, per the Investment Policy, the City has an established maturity matrix with the investment ranges as follows:

Maturity Range Guideline Portfolio Percentage
The city’s current investment maturity range is as follows:

Amount % of Portfolio
$2,271,834.16 3%
$7,109,248.38 9%
$20,609,681.26 27%
$19,554,471.52 25%
$7,692,850.40 10%
$0.00 0%
$19,593,000.00 26%
$76,831,085.72 100%

CALTRUST

GSE AGENCY BONDS

COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS
U.S TREASURY BILLS

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT

TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)

INVESTMENTS BY TYPE

CHECKING & MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS/CASH ON HAND/

CASH HELD FOR INVESTMENT
Type
1 Day to 1 Year 30% - 100%
1 Year to 3 Years 5% - 60%
3 Years to 5 Years 0% - 40%
Amount % of Portfolio
36,998,923.53$ 48%
15,258,451.34$ 20%
24,573,710.85$ 31%
76,831,085.72$ 100%
3 Yrs. to 5 Yrs.

Total

INVESTMENTS BY MATURITY
Maturity Range
1 Day to 1 Yr.
1 Yr. to 3 Yrs.

Receive and File the September 2025 Investment Report Page 4 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
The weighted average maturity for all City investments is 1.72 years, short term investments with maturity within six months continues to draw higher yields, however longer-term yields have been increasing making investing in longer term assets more appealing.

Specific details pertaining to the City’s investment names, CUSIP #’s, coupon and purchase yields, maturity dates, par and book values are included in the Investment and Cash Condition Report attachment.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Michael O'Brien
Director of Administrative Services
Attachments:

1. Investment and Cash Condition Report

2. Investment Authorization Form

CITY OF SAN DIMAS

MONTHLY CASH BALANCE INVESTMENT REPORT
SEPTEMBER 2025

ENDING BALANCE
$1,196,240.96
BMO HARRIS - MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT $1,034,521.53
$2,640.00
$7,109,248.38
$6,229,363.58
$14,380,317.68
PRINCIPAL IN BROKER MONEY MARKET $38,431.67
CUSIP # COUPON
YIELD

PURCHASE

YIELD MATURITY PAR VALUE BOOK VALUE
CHEVRON - 3 YEAR BOND 166756ALO 1.02% 4.75% 8/12/2027 $250,000.00 $222,444.51 UNITED HEALTH GROUP - 4 YEAR BOND 91324PDK5 3.85% 4.73% 6/15/2028 $250,000.00 $241,935.46 ADVOCATE HEALTH & HOSPS CORP 007589AA2 3.83% 4.64% 8/15/2028 $305,000.00 $296,779.55 NY LIFE GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 64952WFF5 4.70% 4.76% 1/29/2029 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 METLIFE GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 59217GFR5 4.85% 4.90% 1/8/2029 $250,000.00 $249,451.14 MASS MUTUAL GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 57629W4T4 5.15% 5.15% 5/30/2029 $250,000.00 $249,998.23 NORTHWESTERN MUT GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 66815L2Q1 4.71% 5.16% 1/10/2029 $250,000.00 $245,327.02 ATHENE GLOBAL FDG - 5 YEAR BOND 04685A3G4 2.71% 4.43% 1/7/2029 $350,000.00 $326,841.60 TOYOTA MTR CORP 59217GFR5 3.65% 4.20% 1/9/2029 $300,000.00 $293,442.80 RGA GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 76209PAB9 2.70% 4.50% 1/18/2029 $300,000.00 $278,689.63 MERCEDES BENZ - 4.85 YEAR BOND 233851DW1 3.10% 4.64% 8/15/2029 $350,000.00 $327,541.16 ASCENSION TAXABLE - 4.5 YEAR BOND 04352EAA3 4.45% 4.45% 8/15/2029 $350,000.00 $322,849.13 MUTUAL OF OMAHA - 5 YEAR BOND 62829D2E9 4.75% 4.75% 10/15/2029 $250,000.00 $249,997.05 PRICOA GLOBAL FUNDING - 5 YEAR BOND 74153WCW7 4.70% 4.40% 10/15/2029 $325,000.00 $325,000.00 MET TOWER CORP BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 58989V2L7 4.05% 4.05% 10/6/2030 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $4,480,297.28
CALIFORNIA ST DEPT WATER - 4 YEAR BOND 13067WRF1 1.32% 4.70% 12/1/2028 $250,000.00 $215,147.50 CALIFORNIA ST DEPT WTR - 3 YEAR BOND 13067WRF1 1.32% 4.28% 12/1/2028 $330,000.00 $297,851.40 YUCAIPA VY CALIF WATER DISTRICT 98840BBD4 2.29% 4.72% 9/1/2027 $250,000.00 $232,227.50 ONTARIO CALIFORNIA PUB - 3 YEAR BOND 68304RCD0 1.81% 4.52% 10/1/2027 $255,000.00 $232,539.60 CALIFORNIA ST UNIV REV SYSTEMWIDE- 4 YEAR BOND 13077DQG0 3.85% 4.70% 6/15/2028 $310,000.00 $270,924.50 SOLANO CALIF COMMUNITY COLLEGE - 4 YEAR BOND 83412PHB1 1.48% 4.50% 8/1/2028 $350,000.00 $308,661.50 05565ECR4 4.65% 5.00% 8/13/2029 $300,000.00 $295,721.23 PACIFIC LIFE GLOBAL - 4.5 YEAR BOND 6944PL3C1 4.50% 4.55% 8/28/2029 $250,000.00 $248,463.27 AIG GLOBAL - 4.43 YEAR BOND 00138CBC1 4.90% 4.90% 12/3/2029 $350,000.00 $348,496.02 PROTECTIVE LIFE GLOBAL - 4.8 YEAR BOND 74368CCA0 4.77% 4.77% 12/9/2029 $350,000.00 $347,908.68 SAN BUENAVENTURA CALIFORNIA WATER - 4.5 YEAR BOND 797055DQ0 4.37% 4.37% 1/1/2030 $305,000.00 $271,553.70 WESTERN - SOUTHERN GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 95954A2A0 4.50% 4.90% 5/1/2030 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - 5 YEAR BOND 91412HJR5 4.43% 4.43% 5/15/2030 $500,000.00 $444,445.00 $3,863,939.90
FEDERAL NATIONAL MTG ASSN - 4 YEAR BOND 3135GASJ1 4.50% 4.70% 5/17/2028 $250,000.00 $248,175.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN - 5 YEAR BOND 1334HA2L6 4.37% 4.55% 1/16/2030 $500,000.00 $496,000.00 $744,175.00
BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WK25 0.75% 0.75% 10/30/2025 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP - 5 YEAR BOND 38150EH4 0.80% 0.80% 11/24/2025 $290,000.00 $290,000.00 JP MORGAN BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 48128G3G3 1.20% 1.20% 4/30/2026 $285,000.00 $285,000.00 EXXON MOBILE CORP - 7 YEAR BOND 30231GBD3 2.28% 0.98% 8/16/2026 $250,000.00 $264,953.75 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP - 5 YEAR BOND 38150AJ63 1.70% 1.70% 10/29/2026 $210,000.00 $210,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY FIN GLOBAL - 5 YEAR BOND 61766YGT2 1.35% 1.35% 11/18/2026 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 48128G5Y2 2.10% 2.10% 1/29/2027 $270,000.00 $270,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WS84 2.75% 2.75% 3/2/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY-FIN GLOBAL 5 YEAR BOND 61766YJQ5 3.25% 3.25% 4/13/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 INTEL CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 458140BY5 3.75% 4.25% 8/5/2027 $250,000.00 $244,538.75 WELLS FARGO - 4 YEAR BOND 95001DL99 4.50% 4.50% 8/4/2029 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $2,814,492.50

INVESTMENTS
TVI CORPORATE BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

SUMMARY OF BANK BALANCES YIELD

0.75%

4.212%

BMO HARRIS - GENERAL ACCOUNT

SAN DIMAS PETTY CASH - IMPREST FUNDS

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CA STATE TREASURER

3.91%
CALTRUST INVESTMENT PROGRAM-MEDIUM TERM 3.97%

CALTRUST LIQUIDITY FUND
INVESTMENTS HELD WITH TVI:

PACIFIC SECURITIES COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

PACIFIC SECURITIES CORPORATE BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

PACIFIC SECURITIES GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

BMW US CAP LLC - 4.5 YEAR BOND

4.32%
INVESTMENTS HELD WITH GREAT PACIFIC SECURITIES:

ATTACHMENT 1

CAPITAL ONE BANK - 4 YEAR CD 14042TFH5 2.65% 2.65% 4/13/2026 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SAVINGS - 5 YEAR CD 89235MLC3 0.95% 0.95% 7/15/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 MARINE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 56824JBD54 4.20% 4.20% 11/27/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA NEW YORK - 5 YEAR CD 38149M4T7 2.65% 2.65% 4/13/2027 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 STATE BANK OF INDIA - 5 YEAR CD 856285N64 3.30% 3.30% 6/1/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 CENTRAL BANK LITTLE ROCK ARK - 5 YEAR CD 152577BS0 5.30% 5.30% 6/30/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 $1,482,000.00
CALIFORNIA STATE - 5 YEAR BOND 13063EGT7 4.50% 4.32% 8/1/2029 $275,000.00 $277,068.00 $277,068.00
FEDERAL AGRIC MTG CORP - 3 YEAR BOND 31424WNJ7 4.54% 4.53% 9/9/2027 $265,000.00 $264,999.97 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYSTEMWIDE - 5 YEAR BOND 3133ERL41 4.13% 4.40% 12/17/2029 $517,000.00 $510,703.46 $775,703.43
FEDL FARM CREDIT BANK - 4 YEAR BOND 3133ENEH9 1.13% 1.13% 11/17/2025 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130AL2G8 0.60% 0.75% 2/18/2026 $250,000.00 $248,250.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - DISC BOND - 3YEAR 3138LDPW7 2.68% 4.58% 5/1/2026 $250,000.00 $228,805.98 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 2 YEAR BOND 3138LDYL1 2.47% 4.93% 6/1/2026 $500,000.00 $473,750.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130ANMH0 1.10% 1.42% 8/20/2026 $250,000.00 $246,400.00 FEDL FARM CREDIT BANK BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3133ENSZ4 2.75% 2.75% 4/1/2027 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK - 5 YEAR BOND 3130ASZ69 4.05% 4.08% 8/27/2027 $250,000.00 $249,625.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN- 5 YEAR BOND 3140LBSE4 1.09% 4.38% 3/1/2028 $350,000.00 $306,250.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NUUA5 4.52% 4.52% 3/1/2029 $500,000.00 $499,062.50 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 3.9 YEAR BOND 3140LFKC7 4.20% 2.11% 3/1/2029 $365,000.00 $337,739.06 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XDBP7 4.15% 4.61% 4/1/2029 $400,000.00 $392,857.31 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XKSV0 3.81% 3.81% 7/1/2029 $400,000.00 $387,000.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 314HU7G5 2.74% 4.06% 8/1/2029 $500,000.00 $472,031.25 FEDL HOMELOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XKTE7 4.02% 4.49% 8/1/2029 $505,000.00 $495,846.88 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 4.8 YEAR BOND 3140HVJ62 4.60% 2.61% 9/1/2029 $390,000.00 $357,946.88 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND 3132XFSR0 4.42% 4.71% 9/1/2029 $500,000.00 $494,687.50 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 340NWFK6 4.01% 4.37% 10/1/2029 $500,000.00 $492,656.25 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140HV4J0 2.14% 4.60% 10/1/2029 $550,000.00 $493,028.24 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 4 YEAR BOND 3140HWK50 2.67% 3.84% 11/1/2029 $500,000.00 $479,687.50 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NXC50 4.56% 4.76% 1/1/2030 $500,000.00 $496,562.50 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140HW4G4 2.43% 4.75% 1/1/2030 $550,000.00 $493,281.25 FEDL HOME LOAN BANK BOND - 4.75 YEAR BOND 3132XFVC9 4.00% 4.00% 1/1/2030 $325,000.00 $321,140.63 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP- 4.75 YEAR BOND 3132XFWC8 4.31% 4.31% 2/1/2030 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 4.9 YEAR BOND 3132ZKYX9 4.15% 4.15% 3/1/2030 $500,000.00 $498,906.25 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 4.9 YEAR BOND 3132XFWA2 3.75% 3.75% 3/1/2030 $500,000.00 $489,375.00 FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP- 4.8 YEAR BOND 313XFWS3 4.17% 4.12% 4/1/2030 $340,000.00 $339,681.25 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 314ONYPF2 4.25% 4.25% 6/1/2030 $500,000.00 $498,281.25 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NYQL8 4.15% 4.15% 6/1/2030 $500,000.00 $498,125.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140NYXE6 4.24% 4.24% 7/1/2030 $500,000.00 $499,375.00 FNMA BOND - 5 YEAR BOND 3140J0JC5 4.07% 1.25% 7/1/2030 $550,000.00 $481,250.00 FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND 3140Q0A77 4.14% 4.14% 8/1/2030 $300,000.00 $299,812.50 3132XHS47 3.25% 3.92% 9/1/2030 $500,000.00 $482,880.83
3136GASX8 3.75% 3.75% 9/18/2030 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $13,554,295.81
BANK OF AMERICA - 5 YEAR BOND 06048WP20 1.25% 1.25% 9/24/2026 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 APPLE INC - 10 YEAR CORPORATE BOND 037833CR9 3.20% 3.30% 5/11/2027 $250,000.00 $248,850.00 SADDLEBACK VALLEY - 7.75 YEAR BOND (MUNICIPAL BOND) 786318LF0 2.40% 3.41% 8/1/2027 $250,000.00 $238,500.00 STIFEL COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS SUBTOTAL: $737,350.00 STIFEL GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES (GSE) AGENCY BONDS INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL:

TVI CD'S INVESTMENTS SUBTOTAL :

TVI MUNICIPAL BONDS SUBTOTAL :

TVI GOVERNMENT AGENCY BONDS SUBTOTAL :

FEDL HOME LOAN MTG CORP - 5 YEAR BOND
FEDL NATL MTG ASSN - 5 YEAR BOND

BARCLAYS BANK - 4 YEAR CD 06740KNT0 1.00% 1.00% 12/15/2025 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 US ALLIANCE FED C.U - 4 YEAR CD 90352RCD5 1.35% 1.35% 1/28/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK- 3.5 YEAR CD 3078115EL9 3.20% 3.20% 2/5/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CONNEX CREDIT UNION - 18 MONTH CD 208212BN9 4.45% 4.45% 2/27/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CFG COMMUNITY BANK - 3.5 YEAR CD 12527CFL1 3.80% 3.80% 3/11/2026 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 ALASKA US FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 011852AH3 5.15% 5.15% 3/23/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 COMENITY CAPITAL BANK- 4 YEAR CD 20033A2Z8 2.60% 2.60% 4/14/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BAXTER CR UN - 4 YEAR CD 07181JAD6 3.05% 3.05% 6/22/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 INSPIRE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 457731AQ0 5.00% 5.00% 6/30/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK - 5 YEAR CD 649447UZ0 0.70% 0.70% 7/1/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SALLIE MAE BANK SALT LAKE CITY UT - 5 YEAR CD 795451AB9 1.00% 1.00% 7/21/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 AUSTIN TELCO FED CR - 2 YEAR CD 052392DG9 4.25% 4.25% 8/21/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 WORKERS CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 98138MCJ7 4.15% 4.15% 8/31/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 FIRST STATE BANK - 4 YEAR CD 33650TAH3 3.60% 3.60% 9/16/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 QUORUM FED CR - 4 YEAR CD 74909LAB6 3.85% 3.85% 9/23/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 PENTAGON FEDERAL CR UN - 5 YEAR CD CUSIP #70962LAS1 70962LAS1 0.90% 0.90% 9/29/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ONPATH FEDERAL CREDIT UN - 4 YEAR CD 68283MAF3 3.25% 3.25% 9/30/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 HAWAII CENTRAL FCU - 3 YEAR CD 419700AG4 5.50% 5.50% 10/27/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BANK UNITED NA - 5 YEAR CD 066519RW1 1.35% 1.35% 12/8/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 RIZE FED CR UN - 2 YEAR CD 76971LAJ7 4.25% 4.25% 12/14/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BANK HAPOALIM BM - 5 YEAR CD 06251A3K4 1.35% 1.35% 12/16/2026 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 CONNEXUS CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 20825WAR1 1.25% 1.25% 12/23/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 WEST VIRGINIA CENTRAL FCU - 2 YEAR CD 95649LAB6 4.60% 4.60% 12/23/2026 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 AMERANT BANK - 5 YEAR CD 02357QAQ0 1.60% 1.60% 2/16/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 PIMA CREDIT UNION- 4.5 YEAR CD 722000AA4 5.15% 5.15% 2/17/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 METRO CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 59161YAP1 1.70% 1.70% 2/18/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BEAL BANK PLANO TEXAS - 5 YEAR CD 07371AZQ9 2.05% 2.05% 3/3/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 BEAL BANK USA LAS VEGAS - 5 YEAR CD 07371CK81 2.05% 2.05% 3/3/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SPOKANE TEACHERS CR 849061AF3 4.75% 4.75% 3/25/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY- 5 YEAR CD 61773TDN0 3.00% 3.00% 4/29/2027 $246,000.00 $246,000.00 GENERATION BANK ROGERS AR CD - 5 YEAR CD 37149CAV9 3.10% 3.10% 5/6/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - 5 YEAR CD 24951TAT2 3.25% 3.25% 5/13/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 RADIFI FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 2 YEAR CD 75034WAA9 4.00% 4.00% 5/13/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 FIRST FED SVGS - 3 YEAR CD 32023HBT4 5.25% 5.25% 6/28/2027 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 CALDWELL BT CO - 2 YEAR CD 128829AQ1 4.00% 4.00% 6/30/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 TRUSTONE FINL CR UN - 5 YEAR CD 89841MAF4 3.40% 3.40% 7/19/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 BMO HARRIS BANK - 5 YEAR CD 05600XHE3 3.55% 3.55% 7/27/2027 $247,000.00 $247,000.00 THIRD FEDL S&L ASSN - 5 YEAR CD 88413QDM7 3.40% 3.40% 7/27/2027 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 CMNTY COMMERCE BANK CLAREMONT- 5 YEAR CD 20367GBH1 3.30% 3.30% 8/10/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ST VINCENT MED CTR CR - 5 YEAR CD 85279AAA0 3.50% 3.50% 8/12/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 PITTSBURG CITY HALL FCU - 5 YEAR CD 72500MAA3 3.60% 3.60% 8/16/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SHARONVIEW FCU - 5 YEAR CD 819866BL7 3.50% 3.50% 8/16/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GHS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 36266LAA4 3.80% 3.80% 9/15/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 OKLAHOMA EDUCATORS CR - 2 YEAR CD 67885MAE0 3.65% 3.65% 10/4/2027 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 VALLEY NAT BANK - 2.5 YEAR CD 919853QW4 4.20% 4.20% 12/23/2027 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 MEDALLION BANK - 3 YEAR CD 58404DXY2 4.10% 4.10% 6/30/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 NEW ORLEANS FIREMANS FCU - 5 YEAR CD 647608AH1 5.00% 5.00% 7/17/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SOUTHPOINT BANK - 3 YEAR CD 84464PCC9 4.00% 4.00% 4/28/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SOUND CREDIT UNION - 4 YEAR CD 83616HAH7 4.15% 4.15% 6/2/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 NUMERICA CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 67054NBK8 5.10% 5.10% 7/31/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SOUTHWEST FINAL FED - 3 YEAR CD 84485EAN7 4.00% 4.00% 8/15/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 GREEN STATE CREDIT UNION- 5 YEAR CD 39573LEL8 5.00% 5.00% 8/29/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 RIA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3 YEAR CD 749622BX3 4.00% 4.00% 10/13/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CIVIC FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 3.25 YEAR CD 178808AB7 4.10% 4.10% 10/23/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 ALLIANT CREDIT UNION- 5 YEAR CD 01882MAH5 5.35% 5.35% 11/15/2028 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SAN FRANCISCO FEDL CR UNION - 4 YEAR CD 79772FAL0 4.25% 4.25% 11/27/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 SKYLA FEDL CREDIT UNION - 3.5 YEAR CD 83086XAE0 4.10% 4.10% 11/30/2028 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 MAINE SAVINGS - 3.5 YEAR CD 560507AU9 4.00% 4.00% 1/30/2029 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 OPTUM BANK - 4 YEAR CD 68405VDC0 4.00% 4.00% 4/30/2029 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 TRUIST BANK - 5 YEAR CD 897926BG5 4.45% 4.45% 4/30/2029 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY PVT - 5 YEAR CD 61776NRX3 4.15% 4.15% Page 36 – 427 5/7/2029 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 TEXAS EXCHABGE BANK - 4 YEAR CD 88241TWS5 3.60% 3.60% 10/5/2029 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 USF FEDL CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 90353EBS1 4.65% 4.65% 12/20/2029 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK - 5 YEAR CD 46657VWH9 4.75% 4.75% 1/31/2030 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 SMARTBANK - 5 YEAR CD 83172HHT0 4.60% 4.60% 2/8/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 WEST GATE BANK LINCOLN -5 YEAR CD 95285QCE6 4.60% 4.60% 2/19/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 TUCSON FEDL CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 898812AE2 4.65% 4.65% 3/7/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 A+ FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - 5 YEAR CD 00224TAS5 4.15% 4.15% 3/28/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK - 5 YEAR CD 02589AGX4 4.15% 4.15% 3/26/2030 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 AMERICAN BANK COMMERCE - 5 YEAR CD 02432LAC1 4.50% 4.50% 6/25/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 CITIBANK SIOUX BANK - 5 YEAR CD 17290GCM7 4.25% 4.25% 7/21/2030 $244,000.00 $244,000.00 CREDIT HUMAN FED CR UN - 5 YEAR CD 22537MAJ6 3.65% 3.65% 9/30/2030 $249,000.00 $249,000.00 $18,111,000.00
$46,840,321.92
$76,831,085.72
Amount % of Portfolio Amount % of Portfolio
$2,271,834.16 3% $ 36,998,923.53 48%
$7,109,248.38 9% $ 15,258,451.34 20%
$20,609,681.26 27% $ 24,573,710.85 31%
$19,554,471.52 25% $ 76,831,085.72 100%
$7,692,850.40 10%
$0.00 0%
$19,593,000.00 26% 3.88%
$76,831,085.72 100% 1.72
Michael O'Brien Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Prepared by: Jennifer Legaspi
The above investments have met the requirements as stated in the City's Annual Investment Policy.

CALTRUST

GSE AGENCY BONDS

COMMERCIAL & MUNICIPAL BONDS
U.S TREASURY BILLS

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS Weighted Average Maturity in Years Weighted Average Yield
3 Yrs. to 5 Yrs.

Total

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)

INVESTMENTS BY TYPE INVESTMENTS BY MATURITY

CHECKING & MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS/CASH ON HAND/ CASH

HELD FOR INVESTMENT
Maturity Range
1 Day to 1 Yr.
1 Yr. to 3 Yrs.

Type
TOTAL CD's/GSE BONDS/ CORPORATE BONDS/TREASURY BILLS

TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS
STIFEL CD'S INVESTMENT SUBTOTAL:

ATTACHMENT 2

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Lily Flores, Housing Manager
Subject: Approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the City of San Dimas for Distribution and Use of Measure A Local Solutions Funds and Approval of an Expenditure and Offsetting Revenue Budget Appropriation in Fund 034 for Measure A Local Solutions Funds in an Amount not to Exceed $115,790
____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The City has been awarded One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Dollars ($115,790) for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year from the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments for the Distribution and Use of Measure A Local Solutions Funds. The City will utilize these funds for Case Management and Outreach Services and for Flexible Rental Subsidies.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the City of San Dimas for Distributions and Use of Measure A Local Solutions Funds;

2. Approve an additional Budget Appropriation of $115,790 to the current budget in the Revenue Account 034.358.000 and the Expenditure Account 034.4802.020.004 for the Measure A Local Solutions Fund; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute any and all documents necessary to further the program approved herein, including but not limited to amendments and modifications to the Measure A Local Solutions Fund with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:

Measure A Local Solutions Funds MOA Page 2
For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
No

FISCAL IMPACT
The awarded amount of the Measure A Local Solutions Fund for FY 2025-26 is $115,790, which will be offset by equivalent revenue from the City’s Measure A Local Solutions Fund Allocation.

Additional limited staff time will be required to administer the program and funds.

BACKGROUND
In November of 2024, the voters of Los Angeles County approved an ordinance imposing a halfcent sales tax on all sales of tangible personal property sold within the County with the primary purpose of which is to address homelessness within the County. The tax is collected by the County Auditor – Controller and pursuant to Measure A, 60% of the proceeds are to be distributed by the County Auditor – Controller to the County and as set forth in Measure A, at least 15% of the 60% Measure A proceeds received by the County are allocated for the Local Solutions Fund (“LSF”).

Under Measure A, the LSF funds are to be distributed, as determined by the County, to cities or Council of Governments. Of the 31 San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (“SGVCOG”) member cities, five (5) cities have a direct contract with the County for an allocation of LSF (Baldwin Park, El Monte, Montebello, Pasadena, and Pomona), while the LSF allocation for the remaining twenty-six (26) cities, including San Dimas, is pursuant to an agreement between the SGVCOG and the County. The SGVCOG entered into an agreement with the County on August 28, 2025, for its use of LSF allocation to address homelessness on a regional basis within its jurisdiction.

The SGVCOG gave the remaining twenty-six (26) cities whose allocation was more than $100,000 the opportunity to receive their LSF allocation as a sub-recipient, adhering to the terms and conditions of the County LSF Agreement with the SGVCOG. Due to the City’s ongoing efforts in addressing homelessness on a local level, the City requested to receive LSF allocation as a sub-recipient to utilize for the purposes set forth in Measure A. The SGVCOG has agreed that the City may be a sub-recipient of the LSF and created the Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) between the SGVCOG and the City of San Dimas for Distribution and Use of Measure A Local Solutions Funds. The MOA was reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The LSF empowers local jurisdictions to develop and implement programs tailored to their specific homelessness challenges while adhering best practices for standardizing of care and accountability measures. Efforts to address homelessness have been continuously strengthened by the City. The City created the Housing Services Coordinator in 2023 and has a 5-day outreach and case management contract with the Los Angeles Center for Alcohol and Drug Abuse (L.A.

CADA). The Housing Division has implemented programs providing case management, rapid rehousing, rental assistance, and other flexible rent subsidies. In the last year, the City has made contact with over 200 homeless individuals, connected 51 to interim housing, placed 11 in permanent housing, 8 in substance abuse treatment facilities, and 12 accepted mental health services. With these efforts, the Housing division is confident we will meet the metrics and expenditures in compliance with the terms and conditions of the County’s LSF Agreement with the SGVCOG.

Measure A Local Solutions Funds MOA Page 3
For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Based on the County’s LSF Formula, the City of San Dimas LSF allocation is $124,690. The SGVCOG assesses an $8,900 administrative fee to cover its staff time associated with managing the City’s sub-recipient agreement. The SGVCOG will be charging each city that enters into a MOA this administrative fee. The $8,900 fee reduced the City’s LSF award amount to $115,790 for FY 2025-26.

The Housing Division has proposed to utilize approximately half of the awarded amount ($57,920) for Permanent Housing for Persons Experiencing Homelessness - Flexible Rental Subsidies. With these funds, the City will provide rental assistance for participants experiencing homelessness, including time limited subsidies, rapid rehousing, shallow subsidies, and other flexible rent subsidies. Our Performance Indicators and Outcome will be assisting five (5) unduplicated number of households. This will align with Measure A Goal #1: Increase the number of people moving from encampments into permanent housing to reduce unsheltered homelessness.

The remaining balance of the award amount ($57,870) will be used for Case Management and Outreach Services. These funds will be used to pay a portion of the City’s contract with L.A.

CADA. L.A. CADA will be adjusting their current billing to reflect payroll and indirect costs incurred.

L.A. CADA will continue to deliver case management and outreach services for persons experiencing homelessness connecting clients to services, secure housing, and maintain stable housing. Our Performance Indicators and Outcome will be engaging with 125 unduplicated persons and placing 15 in interim or permanent housing. This will align with Measure A Goal #1:

Increase the number of people moving from encampments into permanent housing to reduce unsheltered homelessness.

The City will submit monthly invoices and reports to the SGVCOG. Funding will be disbursed to the City on a reimbursement basis.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may choose not to approve the MOA between the City and the SGVCOG for the distribution and use of Measure A Local Solutions Funds and instead opt to participate in SGVCOG regional programs. However, staff does not recommend this option, as it would result in the City receiving less than its full funding allocation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), CEQA does not apply to this item because there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no additional environmental review is needed at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Lily Flores
Housing Manager
Attachment:

1. Memorandum of Agreement between the SGVCOG and the City for Distribution and Use of Measure A Local Solutions Funds.

4913-0180-9766, v. 1

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF

GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS FOR

DISTRIBUTION AND USE OF MEASURE A LOCAL SOLUTIONS
FUNDS
This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is made as of this XX, day of XXX, 2025 by and between the City of San Dimas, a municipal corporation (“City”), and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, a California joint powers authority (“SGVCOG”). City and SGVCOG may be referred to herein collectively as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party.” RECITALS:

A. In November of 2024 the voters in Los Angeles County (“County”) approved an ordinance imposing a half-cent sales tax on all sales of tangible personal property sold within the County (hereafter, “Measure A”), the primary purpose of which is to address homelessness within the County.

B. The tax will be collected by the County Auditor-Controller and pursuant to Measure A 60% of the proceeds are to be distributed by the County Auditor-Controller to the County.

C. As further set forth in Measure A, at least 15% of the 60% Measure A proceeds received by the County are allocated for the Local Solutions Fund (“LSF”).

D. Under Measure A, the proceeds allocated to LSF are to be distributed to, as determined by the County, to cities or council of governments. Of the 31 SGVCOG member cities, five cities will have direct agreements with the County for an allocation of LSF, while the LSF allocation for the remaining 26 cities is pursuant to an agreement between the SGVCOG and the County, which agreement was entered into on August 28, 2025 (“County LSF Agreement”).

E. The SGVCOG was established to have a unified voice to maximize resources and advocate for regional and member interests to improve the quality of life in the San Gabriel Valley by the member cities and other local governmental agencies and intends to use its LSF allocation to address homelessness on a regional basis within its jurisdiction.

F. Rather than participate with the SGVCOG in addressing homelessness on a regional basis from a LSF funding standpoint, the City has notified the SGVCOG of its preference to receive an LSF allocation as a sub-recipient to utilize for the purposes set forth in Measure A within its jurisdiction and the SGVCOG has agreed that City may be a sub-recipient of the LSF.

G. The City has been awarded One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Dollars ($115,790) ( “Subrecipient Funding”) for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year.

ATTACHMENT 1

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
H. The City acknowledges that the SGVCOG is ultimately responsible, as between itself and the County, for documenting that the Subrecipient Funding was expended in compliance with the terms and conditions of the County LSF Agreement and as a result recognizes that City’s failure to expend funds in accordance with the County LSF Agreement or this MOA or provide timely documentation to the SGVCOG as set forth in this MOA could harm the SGVCOG’s reputation and result in financial assessments against the SGVCOG and as such, the City represents that it will undertake with all due diligence the fulfillment of its obligations under this MOA
I. City and SGVCOG desire to set forth the terms of their respective responsibilities in implementing in this MOA. The recitals are made a substantive part of this MOA and the Parties further agree as follows:

I. TERM:

The term of this MOA shall commence on the date set forth above and shall continue until the City has met all of its reporting obligations and returned to the SGVCOG any portion of the Subrecipient Funding that might be required under this MOA, unless terminated earlier as provided herein. The term of this MOA may be extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties.

II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES:

A. SGVCOG shall:

1. Designate a point-of-contact with name, title, and contact information who will serve as the SGVCOG’s project manager throughout the Project. If the point-of-contact is reassigned or no longer with the SGVCOG, a new pointof-contact will be designated within seven (7) calendar days.

2. Serve as the administrator of the LSF allocated to the SGVCOG.

3. As between the County and the SGVCOG, be responsible for all reporting to the County of the City’s use of the Subrecipient Funding as required by the County LSF Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this MOA.

4. Reimburse the City in an amount up to One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Dollars ($115,790) in accordance with the Project Budget attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by reference.

5. Review City reports, documents, expenditures, and other materials required of City pursuant to this MOA and the County LSF Agreement (collectively, the “City Documents”) to ensure that such City Documents are sufficient for the SGVCOG to meet its reporting obligations under the County LSF Agreement and as otherwise required by this MOA.

6. Notify the City concerning any deficiencies in the City Documents and what additional information or corrections are needed.

B. City shall:

4913-0180-9766, v. 1

1. Designate a point-of-contact with name, title, and contact information who will serve as the City’s project manager throughout the Project. If the pointof-contact is reassigned or no longer with the City, a new point-of-contact will be designated within seven (7) calendar days.

2. Utilize the Subrecipient Funding only for expenditures directly related to the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference (“Scope of Services”) and otherwise ensure that all expenditures meet all requirements of the County LSF Agreement and this MOA.

3. Be responsible for implementation of the Scope of Services, including, but not limited to retaining such consultants and contractors as necessary to complete the Scope of Services and obtaining from such consultants and contractors all information that may be needed to ensure the City Documents meet the requirements of this MOA.

4. Be solely responsible for paying any such consultants and contractors from the Subrecipient Funding or other City funds.

5. Participate in check-in calls and/or meetings with the SGVCOG and/or County as reasonably requested, and promptly respond to SGVCOG and/or County requests for information, Scope of Services status, and any deficiencies noted by the SGVCOG and/or the County in the City Documents. .

6. Timely provide to the SGVCOG all City Documents that are required under this MOA and otherwise to enable the SGVCOG to fulfill its reporting obligations under the County LSF Agreement with respect to the Subrecipient Funding. City agrees and acknowledges that the SGVCOG will primarily be relying on the City Documents with respect to the SGVCOG’s reporting obligations under the County LSF Agreement with respect to the Subrecipient Funding. To the extent that the County determines there any deficiencies in such SGVCOG’s reporting obligations that arise in whole or part from City Documents containing errors, misrepresentations, omissions or any other deficiencies, City shall promptly correct such deficiencies upon notice from the SGVCOG, but in no event in less than five (5) business days from the date of the SGVCOG’s notification to the City of such errors or omissions.

7. Provide quarterly reports in a form acceptable to the SGVCOG that includes, but is not limited to, information describing the implementation of the Scope of Services and expenditures related to such work and all other information required by the SGVCOG to meet its reporting obligations under the County LSF Agreement. The City acknowledges that under the County LSF Agreement the SGVCOG is required to submit quarterly reports by the 30th day of October of 2025, and January, April, and July of 2026 and that such quarterly reports must contain information regarding the City’s use of the Subrecipient Funding. As a result, the City’s quarterly reports shall be due by the 15th of October of 2025, and January, April and July of 2026.

8. Provide an annual report by August 1, 2026, containing all the information required by the SGVCOG to fulfill its annual reporting obligations under the County LSF Agreement, including but not limited to, an accounting evidencing whether the City spent 70% by June 15, 2026, of the Subrecipient

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
Funding during fiscal year 2025-26. The City acknowledges that under the County LSF Agreement the SGVCOG is required to submit its annual report on October 1, 2026 and that such annual report must contain information regarding the City’s use of the Subrecipient Funding. As a result, the City’s annual report shall be submitted to the SGVCOG by August 1, 2026.

9. Expend 50% of Subrecipient Funding by April 1, 2026. If City is unable to expend 50% of Subrecipient Funding, City must submit a written plan for how it will expend 70% of Subrecipient Funding by June 15, 2026. The City acknowledges that under the County LSF Agreement, effective October 1, 2027, if the SGVCOG has unexpended funds equaling 30% or more of its allocated proceeds from the Local Solutions Fund in two consecutive annual reports, the excess amount exceeding the 30% threshold will be returned to the County LSF. As a result, the City shall ensure that its expenditures meet that target. If the City fails to meet this target, the SGVCOG, in accordance with this MOA and the County LSF Agreement, the amount of Subrecipient Funding exceeding the 30% threshold will be reallocated and transferred to regional programs.

10. Submit requests to amend Exhibit C to the SGVCOG as soon as possible and no later than April 1, 2026. The City acknowledges that under the County LSF Agreement, the SGVCOG is required to submit budget amendment requests to the County for County approval. SGVCOG cannot guarantee that such modifications will be approved by the County.

11. At all times be a member of the SGVCOG in good standing (meaning current with dues owed as a SGVCOG member agency and not suspended) throughout the term of this MOA. Should City provided notice of withdrawal from the SGVCOG pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement forming the SGVCOG, the SGVCOG may, in its discretion, terminate this Agreement upon written notice.

III. INVOICING
A. City must submit invoices on a monthly basis, no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of each month, evidencing all eligible costs and expenses incurred. City must provide all necessary documentation, including but not limited to invoices and deliverables, as support for the invoice. The invoice must include all work completed during the previous month. City’s final invoice shall be submitted within thirty (30) days of the end of the MOA term.

B. If City does not timely submit invoices, then at the SGVCOG’s sole discretion, all work intended to be paid by such invoice may be considered gratuitous effort on the part of the City, for which City has no claim whatsoever against the SGVCOG.

C. City shall be liable and solely responsible for repayment to SGVCOG of any Project reimbursement requests denied by the County pursuant to Section VIII.C. of the County LSF Agreement resulting solely from City’s failure to timely submit invoices to SGVCOG in accordance with this MOA.

D. City must submit reports, consistent with a format approved by the SGVCOG, by

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
the 15th of the month detailing outcomes during the service period.

IV. PROJECT MANAGEMENT:

A. Project Managers.

1. For the purposes of this MOA, SGVCOG designates the following individual as its Project Manager:

Samantha Piedra
Senior Management Analyst
(626) 373-2484
[email protected]

2. For the purposes of this MOA, the City designates the following individual as its representative:

Lily Flores
Housing Manager
(909) 394-6282
[email protected]
Either Party may change the designations set forth herein upon written notice to the other Party that includes all the information for the representative required by this Section IV.

V. DEFAULT; REMEDIES:

A. Default. A “Default” under this MOA is defined as any one or more of the following: (i) failure of either Party to comply with the terms and conditions contained in this MOA; and/or (ii) failure of either Party to perform its obligations set forth herein satisfactorily.

B. Remedies. In the event of a Default by either Party, the non-defaulting Party will provide a written notice of such Default and thirty (30) days to cure the Default. In the event that the defaulting Party fails to cure the Default, or commit to cure the Default and commence the same within such 30-day period and to the satisfaction of the non-defaulting Party, the non-defaulting Party may terminate this MOA. Such termination shall be effective immediately upon the provision of written notice by the non-defaulting Party to the defaulting Party. The remedies described herein are non-exclusive. In the event of a Default by either Party, the non-defaulting Party shall have the right to seek any and all remedies available at law or in equity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the SGVCOG is under no obligation to provide the City with the opportunity to cure a default which has resulted in the City not being a member in good standing as set forth in Section II.B.10 above.

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
VI. INDEMNIFICATION:

A. City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold free and harmless the SGVCOG, its member agencies, and their respective elected and appointed boards, officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers (collectively, the “SGVCOG Indemnitees”), at City’s sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, or other legal proceedings (collectively, “Claims”) brought against the SGVCOG Indemnitees arising out of or relating to the acts or omissions of City in connection with this MOA, including, but not limited to, penalties, fines, or demands for reimbursement of LHF proceeds that are caused by or related to the City’s errors, misrepresentations, omissions, or other deficiencies in the City Documents, including not timely provide reports within the time provided in this MOA.

B. SGVCOG agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, at SGVCOG’s sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers arising out of or relating to the negligent or willful acts of the SGVCOG in connection with this MOA.

C. To the extent allowed by State law, City shall require that any consultants it retains to perform Scope of Services, defend and indemnify the SGVCOG Indemnitees from and against any and all Claims brought against the SGVCOG Indemnitees arising out of or relating to the acts or omissions of the consultant(s) in connection with the Scope of Services, in the agreement between the consultant and the City and to name the SGVCOG Indemnitees as an additional insured.

D. The indemnity obligations stated in this section shall survive termination of this MOA.

VII. TERMINATION
A. This MOA may be terminated by the SGVCOG at any time that the City is no longer a SGVCOG member in good standing as set forth in Section II.B.10 above or has given the SGVOCG notice of withdrawal from the SGVCOG. Termination will occur the later of the date set forth in the notice or three calendar days (Sundays excluded) from the date the SGVCOG’s notice of termination is deposited in the U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, at the address provided in this MOA for notices or such new replacement address that the City provides in writing to the SGVCOG. In addition to the delivery by U.S. Mail, notices may also be sent by electronic mail As of the effective date of any such termination the City shall no longer be eligible to expend its Subrecipient Funding and shall immediately cease implementation of the Scope of Services and not further expend any Subrecipient Funding except those which are reasonably and necessarily incurred up to the effective date of termination and expended in accordance with this MOA. The City shall return all unexpended proceeds from the Subrecipient

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
Funding with 15 calendar days of the effective date of the SGVCOG’s notice of termination and provide for an accounting of such funds to the reasonable satisfaction of the SGVCOG. Funds not returned within that time shall accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The City’s return of unexpended proceeds shall not relieve it of any obligations it might otherwise have to return any portion of the Subrecipient Funding that might be required of the SGVCOG under the County LSF MOA and/or because it is later determined that the City’s expenditures were otherwise not in compliance with this MOA.

B. This MOA may be terminated for cause at any time for a material default by either Party upon written notice to the other Party. Prior to such termination, the nondefaulting Party shall notify the defaulting Party of the action or non-action constituting the material default. The defaulting Party shall have 10 business days in which to cure the default. If the default cannot be reasonably cured within 10 business days, the defaulting Party shall commence the cure within the 10 business days and work promptly to cure the default within in a reasonable time, but in no event, more than 30 calendar days. If not cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-defaulting Party issuing the written notice within such time periods, the non-defaulting Party shall provide notice of the failure to cure to the defaulting Party and the MOA shall terminate three calendar days after the date the notice is deposited in the U.S. Mail, unless otherwise stated at a later time in the written notice.

VIII. INSURANCE:

A. City and SGVCOG shall maintain and keep in full force and effect during the term of this MOA insurance or a program of self-insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise in connection with City’s or SGVCOG’s performance of its obligations hereunder.

IX. BOOKS AND RECORDS/RIGHT TO AUDIT
A. Maintenance of Books and Records. City shall maintain all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to SGVCOG pursuant to this MOA (collectively, “Books and Records”). All such Books and Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by City pursuant to this MOA. All such documents or records shall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this MOA and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of SGVCOG and its expenditures and the County LSF Agreement.

B Right to Audit. The SGVCOG and/or the County shall have the right to examine and audit all of City’s Books and Records to determine compliance with the terms of this MOA, verify performance and determine the validity of City’s expenditures.

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
City shall reasonably cooperate with the SGVCOG and/or the County in its examination and auditing and make such Books and Records, available to the SGVCOG or the County within five business days of SGVCOG’s or County’s written request during City’s normal business hours. The SGVCOG and/or the County shall pay for the cost of the audit; provided that in the event the audit determines that during the period audited that any City expenditures of 3% or more were invalid, then City shall be liable to the SGVCOG for the reasonable costs of its audit. To the extent the audit disallows any expenditures paid from the Subrecipient Funding City shall reimburse the SGVCOG with 30 days of SGVCOG’s written demand for such amount and if applicable, the cost of the audit.

In the alternative, the SGVCOG may, in its discretion, withhold the amount of the disallowed expenditure and the cost of the audit from any future LSF funds allocated to the City. Should City fail to reimburse the SGVCOG within 30 days of SGVCOG’s written demand, interest shall accrue on the amount owed at the rate of 10 percent per month or the maximum amount allowable by law, whichever is less, until fully paid.

X. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

A. Notices. All notices required or permitted to be given under this MOA shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by electronic mail or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To SGVCOG: Samantha Piedra
Senior Management Analyst
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
1333 S. Mayflower, Suite 360
Monrovia, CA 91016
[email protected]

with a copy to: Marisa Creter
Executive Director
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
1333 S. Mayflower, Suite 360
Monrovia, CA 91016
[email protected]

To City: Lily Flores
Housing Services Manager
245 E. Bonita Ave.

San Dimas, CA 91773
[email protected]
with a copy to: Brad McKinney
City Manager

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
245 E. Bonita Ave.

San Dimas, CA 91773
[email protected]
B. No Partnership. This MOA is not intended to be, and shall not be construed as, an agreement to form a partnership, agency relationship, or a joint venture between the Parties. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the MOA, neither Party shall be authorized to act as an agent of or otherwise to represent the other Party.

C. Entire MOA. This MOA and any exhibits attached hereto, constitute the entire understanding between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes any and all other prior writings and oral negotiations. Except for changes in the designation of representatives and the address for notices, this MOA may be modified only by way of a written amendment and signed by the Parties in interest at the time of such modification. To the extent there is any conflict between this MOA and the County LSF Agreement then the County LSF Agreement shall control.

D. Governing Law. This MOA shall be governed by and construed under California law and any applicable federal law without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this MOA, the Parties hereto agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Los Angeles County, California.

E. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that there is any litigation or other legal proceeding between the Parties in connection with this MOA, each Party shall bear its own costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees; provided that if the SGVCOG institutes litigation to recover any amounts owed to it by the City, the prevailing Party in any such action as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or binding arbitration, should the Parties submit to same, shall be entitled to all reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees.

F. Excusable Delays. Neither Party shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, floods, earthquakes, fires, acts of a public enemy, pandemic, epidemic, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected Party. Each Party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations under this MOA.

G. Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this MOA of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. No waiver of any provision of this MOA shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought.

H. Headings. The section headings contained in this MOA are for convenience and

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the contents to which they relate.

I. Assignment. Neither Party may assign its interest in this MOA, or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of the other Party. Any assignment without consent shall be void and unenforceable.

J. Severability. If any provision of this MOA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

K. Authority to Execute. The person executing this MOA on behalf of a Party warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this MOA on behalf of said Party, and that by doing so said Party is formally bound to the provisions of this MOA.

L. Nondiscrimination. Neither Party shall discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this MOA and will comply with all rules and regulations of the SGVCOG and/or County relating thereto. Such nondiscrimination shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment; upgrading; demotion; transfers; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

M. Counterparts. This MOA may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

N. Electronic Signatures. This MOA may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code Section 16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. [signatures on following page]

4913-0180-9766, v. 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this MOA to be executed to be effective as of the day and year first above written.

FOR THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS
By: ___________________________
Brad McKinney
City Manager

FOR THE SGVCOG
By: ______________________________
Marisa Creter
Executive Director
Approved as to form:

By: ___________________________
Jeff Malawy
City Attorney
Approved as to form:
_______________________________
Cassie Trapesonian
General Counsel

4898-2429-7814, v. 1
Exhibit A
County LSF Agreement

4898-2429-7814, v. 1
Exhibit B
Scope of Services
1G: Eligible Use Permanent Housing for Persons Experiencing Homelessness (PEH) Project Flexible Rental Subsidies
Project Description The funds will the City in providing rental assistance for participants experiencing homelessness, including time-limited subsidies, rapid rehousing, shallow subsidies, and other flexible rent subsidies. City staff will be responsible for administering the program, which will pair appropriate levels of financial assistance with case management and resources to increase income, reduce expenses, and develop financial management skills to help prevent a return to homelessness. Case managers in the City will have access to these resources.

Prior to launching the Program, the City must establish program policies and procedures that defines the requirements for rental assistance, guidelines on the number of months for which clients can receive rental assistance, and the tracking approach to ensure that the intervention is helping clients to remain housed after the intervention ends. These must be provided to the SGVCOG prior to launch. The City will manage the program policies and procedures.

Project Specific Key
Performance
Indicators (PS-KPI)
and Target
Outcomes (PS-TO)
PS-KPI: Total number of households permanently housed with subsidy assistance
 5 unduplicated households
Measure A Goals
and Target Metric
Alignment with Measure A Goal #1: Increase the number of people moving from encampments into permanent housing to reduce unsheltered homelessness:

Target Metric 1a: Decrease by 30 percent the number of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness from a baseline of 52,365 in 2024 to a target of 36,656 in 2030.
2C: Eligible Use Case Management and Outreach Services
Project Case Management & Outreach Services – San Dimas Project Description The funds will support SGVCOG in subcontracting with the city of San Dimas, which will enter into its own subagreement to provide partial funding to LA CADA to deliver case management and outreach services for PEH via a team consisting of a project lead and outreach navigator.. The teams will have access to housing resources (such as Projects 1B, 1E, 1F, 1G, and 1H herein) that will allow team members to place clients in interim and permanent housing. LA CADA teams will engage initially with clients and will continue to provide follow-up case management to help clients connect to services, secure housing, and maintain stable housing.

4898-2429-7814, v. 1
Group 2 Connection The project will be connected with the following investments/programs funded by other entities, governmental or nongovernmental including local agencies such as:

This project will be an avenue for PEH to connect to other Measure Afunded housing resources (such as Projects 1B, 1E, 1F, 1G, and 1H herein). LA CADA teams will be able to place clients into those housing resources as part of their case management and outreach services. In addition, LA CADA has a robust continuum of housing resources to which clients can be referred, and relationships and connections managed by other Local, County, State, and Federal programs, including those executed by LAHSA, DMH, DHS, DCFS, VA, and APS. In addition, the respective LA CADA teams will work in collaboration with SPA 3 CES lead agencies to help connect PEH to shelter (interim housing, recuperative care), permanent housing (Section 8 vouchers), mental health services (DMH), health services (DHS), and substance use treatment services (Medi-Cal funded).

Project Specific Key
Performance
Indicators (PS-KPI)
and Target
Outcomes (PS-TO)
PS-KPI: Number of PEH engaged through outreach services  PS-TO: 125 unduplicated PEH
PS-KPI: Number of PEH placed in interim or permanent housing  PS-TO: 15 unduplicated PEH placements
Measure A Goals
and Target Metric
Alignment with Measure A Goal 1: Increase the number of people moving from encampments into permanent housing to reduce unsheltered homelessness
Target Metric 1a: Decrease by 30 percent the number of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness from a baseline of 52,365 in 2024 to a target of 36,656 in 2030.
4E Admin Costs: Case Management and Outreach Services – San Dimas
Project Description The funds will support indirect costs incurred by LA CADA under City of San Dimas' Project 2C, including office expenses, insurance, cell phones, program supplies, PPE, food, van lease/gas.

Implementation of the above-listed programs must align with best practices for the operation of the respective programs.

City must submit reports and materials to the SGVCOG documenting the implementation of the Project, in alignment with the Project Description above and non-congregate interim housing best practices, and the Project Specific Key Performance Indicators and Target Outcomes outlined above, in a format approved by the SGVCOG. Reports must be submitted in alignment with Section II.B.7 and Section II.B.8 of this MOA.

4898-2429-7814, v. 1
Exhibit C
Project Budget
The Subrecipient Funding is One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Dollars ($115,790), allocated as shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Budget
Project No. Project Description Project Amount
1G Flexible Rental Subsidies $57,920
2C Case Management & Outreach Services – San Dimas
(includes partial funding for a project lead and outreach navigator)
$42,160
4F Admin Costs: Case Management and Outreach Services – San Dimas (supports Project 2C by covering indirect costs for LA CADA)
$15,710
PROJECT SUBTOTAL $115,790
Funding shall be disbursed on a reimbursement basis.

Invoices shall be submitted monthly with supportive documentation attached.

Agenda Item Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Yasmin Dabbous, Assistant Planner
Subject: Adopt Ordinance 1332 to Approve Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05, a City-Initiated Municipal Code Text Amendment to Amend Title 18 Zoning, to Eliminate Chapter 18.188 Explosives from the Code.
____________________________________________________________________________ At the regular City Council meeting on October 14, 2025, the City Council voted 5-0 to introduce Ordinance 1332 approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05 to eliminate Chapter 18.188 Explosives from the San Dimas Municipal Code.

Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council:
• Conduct a second reading; and
• Adopt Ordinance 1332, approving Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05.

Attachment:

1. Ordinance 1332

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE 1332

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 25-05, A CITY-INITIATED MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND TITLE 18 ZONING, TO ELIMINATE CHAPTER 18.188 EXPLOSIVES FROM THE CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY.

WHEREAS, an Amendment to the San Dimas Municipal Code has been duly initiated by the City Council on April 27, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment is described as Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05, a City-initiated Municipal Code Text Amendment to Amend Title 18 Zoning, to eliminate Chapter

18.188 Explosives from the Code in its entirety; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment would affect the area City wide; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2025 the Planning Commission heard evidence and unanimously voted 5-0 to recommend approval of Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05, as provided in Resolution PC-1699, to the City Council; and WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the public hearing on the matter and that public hearing was held on October 14, 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made a part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met for the consideration of whether the project will have a significant effect on the environment. It has been determined that this action is not a project under CEQA, as there will be no direct physical or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the evidence received at the hearing, and for the reasons discussed by the members of the City Council at the hearing, the City Council now finds as follows:

A. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value, precedent or be detrimental to the area.

The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment is intended to eliminate outdated processes, reduce procedural ambiguity, and improve consistency with current federal and state legislation regarding explosives. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect jurisdictional property values, establish negative precedents, or result in detrimental impacts to the San Dimas community. Instead, the proposed amendment seeks to promote clarity for residents and City compliance with active laws put into effect and monitored by superseding national and regional governing agencies.

B. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will further the public health, safety and general welfare.

The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment advances the general welfare of San Dimas residents by following more stringent federal and state regulations regarding the handling, storage and use of explosives. The elimination of Chapter 18.188 intends

Ordinance 1332
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05 Page 2
to provide clarity and consistency with active laws that supersede the City’s current code. This ensures that federal and state laws are abided by regarding standards and operational requirements when it comes to explosive material. The proposed amendment aims to further overall protection of the public health, safety and general welfare of the San Dimas community.

C. The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and applicable Zoning.

The proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment will be consistent with the General Plan and applicable Zoning by further enhancing safety precautions and regulatory processes regarding explosives. The proposed amendment complies with the objectives of the General Plan Safety Element by providing for the safe use and transportation of hazardous materials and waste. The elimination of the Chapter reduces confusion and inconsistencies with federal and state mandates.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ADOPTION. Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05 amending Title 18 of the San Dimas Municipal Code to eliminate Chapter 18.188 Explosives from the Code in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby adopted.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. CEQA DETERMINATION. The City Council hereby finds and determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Thus, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 1506 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted at the duly designated posting places within the City and published once within 15 days after passage and adoption as may be required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of San Dimas hereby designated for that purpose; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within 15 days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

Ordinance 1332
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05 Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas this 28th day of October, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ ___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk Jeff Malawy, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )§

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, Debra Black, City Clerk of the City of San Dimas, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 1332 introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Dimas on the 14th day of October 2025, and thereafter passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 28th day of October, 2025. It has been published and posted pursuant to law.
___________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

Ordinance 1332
Municipal Code Text Amendment 25-05 Page 5
Exhibit A
TITLE 18. ZONING
Chapter 18.188 EXPLOSIVES
Sections:

18.188.010. Definitions.

18.188.020. Permit required.

18.188.030. Application for permit.

18.188.040. Exemptions.
§ 18.188.010. Definitions.

The terms "explosive" and "explosives" whenever used in this title include blasting caps or other detonating or fulminating caps or detonator or electric caps, gunpowder, blasting powder, dynamite, and every other explosive substance having a power equal to or greater than that of ordinary black powder, but do not include said substances in the form of fixed ammunition for small arms.
(Ord. 37 § 538, 1961)
§ 18.188.020. Permit required.

No quantity of explosives in excess of one hundred pounds shall be stored or kept in any place, house or building in the city without a permit therefor from the commission, nor unless the explosives are contained in a magazine situated, constructed, operated and maintained in the manner described in Part I of Division II of the Health and Safety Code. (Ord. 37 § 539, 1961)
§ 18.188.030. Application for permit.

Any person proposing to keep or store any quantity of explosives in excess of one hundred pounds in any place, house or building in the incorporated territory of the city shall file an application for a permit with the planning commission accompanied by the required filing fee and deposit.
(Ord. 37 § 540, 1961)
§ 18.188.040. Exemptions.

Nothing contained in this chapter shall apply to any explosive in transit in railway cars or other vehicles, or to any explosive awaiting transportation in or delivery from a railway car or other vehicle, or the transfer of any such explosive from a car of one railway company to a car of a connecting railway company, provided that the car or other vehicle in which the explosive is being transported or is awaiting transportation or delivery shall be kept locked or guarded; and provided further, that the time during which such explosive is kept waiting transportation or delivery shall not exceed twenty-four hours.
(Ord. 37 § 541, 1961)

Agenda Item Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
From: Brad McKinney, City Manager
Prepared by: Anne Moore, Senior Planner
Subject: Approve Resolution 2025-55, A Resolution of the City Tentative Tract Map 24- 05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and Tree Permit 24-28; SB 330 & Density Bonus Law; PROJ-24-0053. The Proposed Project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects, Class 32. A request to Approve the Subdivision, Filed under SB 330, of One (1) Existing Parcel into 19 New Parcels (TTM 84582) to be Developed with a Total of 37 Detached Two-story Single-family Residences, which Include Seven (7) Affordable Housing Units in Compliance with Density Bonus Law, and the Demolition of Two Residences, Garage, Barn, and the Associated Removal of 40 Mature Trees Located at 901 W. Covina Boulevard within the Single-Family 8,000 Zone (APN: 8385-006-027). ____________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY
The Applicant, Timothy Sales on behalf of RC Homes, is requesting approval to construct 37 detached two-story single-family residences with the associated removal of 40 mature trees located at 901 W. Covina Blvd. within the Single-Family 8,000 Zone. Pursuant to Density Bonus Law (DBL), a density bonus of 17 units, exceeding the max density of 20 units, will be granted in exchange for the development of five (5) low-income and two (2) moderate-income units, and various waivers of development standards that would preclude development of the project as proposed will be granted, along with three (3) development incentives to reduce project costs. The property is currently developed with a two-story Queen Anne style residence built in 1901 with an ancillary barn, and a single-story ranch style residence built in 1964 with an ancillary garage and apartment, which would be demolished as part of the proposed development.

On April 24, 2025, the Development Plan Review Board (DPRB), at a regularly scheduled meeting, recommended approval to the Planning Commission of DPRB 24-14 and TP 24-18 for the demolition of the two-story Queen Anne style residence as well as the design and construction of 37 detached two-story single-family residences along with the associated removal of 40 mature trees. The DPRB did not take any action on the Tentative Tract Map as it was not under their purview.

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 2 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
On July 17, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-18 to the City Council by adopting Resolution PC-1697.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff, the Development Plan Review Board, and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:
• Adopt Resolution 2025-55 (Attachment 1), approving DPRB Case No. 24-14 and TP 24-

28. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:
• Adopt Resolution 2025-55 (Attachment 1), approving TTM 24-05; The proposed project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA guidelines, Title 14, Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects, Class 32.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Yes

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND
The Applicant, Timothy Sales, on behalf of RC Homes, submitted an application for the construction of 37 detached two-story single-family residences with the associated removal of 40 mature trees and the demolition of a two-story Queen Anne style residence in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (84582) (Attachment 2). The development will be located at 901 W.

Covina Boulevard within the Single-Family 8,000 (SF-8000) Zone.

The subject site measures roughly 3.24 acres in size and is located north of W. Covina Boulevard and south of the Southern Pacific Railroad line, with the New Song Church property to the west and the Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates community to the east (Figure 1). In addition, San Dimas High School is located across the street just south of W. Covina Boulevard. The subject property is currently developed with a two-story Queen Anne style residence built in 1901 with an ancillary barn, and a single-story ranch style residence built in 1964 with an ancillary garage and apartment (see Attachment 4, Property Photos). The 1901 residential structure and barn are listed on the city’s Historic Resources Inventory (see Attachment 7, Historic Resource Analysis).

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 3 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
On April 10, 2025, the Applicant held a community information session at the Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates Clubhouse to inform the residents of the mobile home park community about the project. The Applicant provided an overview of the project followed by a Q & A session for attendees to bring up any concerns or questions that they may have about the project. The Applicant also shared with the community the findings from the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) that was completed for the project and explained the construction phasing plan.

The key takeaways from the community information session were the following:

1. Concerns regarding an increase in traffic along W. Covina Boulevard specifically the public driving into the Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates community to make a U-turn;

2. The condition of the existing property line wall particularly along the northern portion of the wall that has some structural damage;

3. Concerns regarding construction noise and debris;

4. Vermin displacement; and

5. Privacy concerns due to all of the units being two-story.

The Applicant acknowledged the above concerns that were raised at the community information session and indicated to the residents that many of their issues of concern are going to be temporary in nature during the construction phase, but have been conditioned to further mitigate the residents’ concerns (see Condition No’s 11, 12, 14, 18, 58, 64, and 87). The concern regarding the existing property line wall abutting the mobile home park community will be addressed later in the report (Condition of Approval No. 20). The Applicant is also adding one tree in each of the rear yards of the residences along the east property line that will help privacy concerns.

At its April 24, 2025 regular meeting, the DPRB considered DPRB 24-14 for the demolition of the Queen Anne style residence and ancillary barn that are listed on the city’s Historic Resources Inventory as well as the design and construction of 37 detached two-story single-family residences, and TP 24-28 for the removal of 40 mature trees, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with the following changes to the conditions of approval (Attachment 10):

Figure 1- Vicinity Map, Subject Site Outlined in Red
W. Covina Blvd.

San Dimas High School
Charter Oak
Mobile Home
Estates
New
Song
Church

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 4 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
• Revised tree replacement condition to include the incorporation of a minimum of six (6) Oak trees to be planted along W. Covina Boulevard as part of the required tree replacement.
• Added Condition: The Applicant/Developer shall comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) during the nesting bird season of February 1 through September 15 to ensure impacts to nesting birds and raptors, which may use vegetation on or near the Project site for nesting, during construction would not occur.

The DPRB did not take any action on the Tentative Tract Map as it was not under their purview.

Therefore, in addition to considering DPRB 24-14 for the demolition of the historic residence as well as the design and construction of the 37 detached two-story single-family residences, and TP 24-28 for the removal of the 40 mature trees, the Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (84582) to subdivide the subject site into 16 numbered lots and three (3) letter lots would be reviewed by the Planning Commission as part of the overall proposed development. The letter lots consist of two (2) open space lots and one lot as the private street.

On July 17, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed development (Attachment 9). During the public hearing, a resident of Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates spoke in opposition of the project due to concerns with the added traffic congestion that would result from the development. During the Commission’s discussion, several Commissioners expressed their concerns regarding the lack of parking provided for the development project; however, the project meets the minimum parking requirements as required by Density Bonus Law, which is discussed further in the parking section, later in the report. The Commission also questioned the right-in and right-out design of the driveway entrance into the development, which was a layout required by Public Works and the City Engineer to address safety hazards for the general area. With the development’s only entrance and exit being directly across the street from two (2) high school entrance and exit driveways, Staff was concerned with the number of U-turns and vehicles merging into opposing lanes within a small general area of a busy section of W.

Covina Blvd. City Staff determined that the safest solution was to remove the left-turn lane and convert it into an extension of the existing landscape median and restrict the development’s driveway to a right-in, right-out configuration, which is included as Condition No. 87 (Figure 2).

Figure 2 – Circulation overview.

After hearing Staff’s presentation, public comments, including additional information provided by the Applicant, the Commission voted 4-0-1 (Commissioner Shirley was absent), to recommend approval of the proposed development to the City Council. As part of the Commission’s New Landscape Median

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 5 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
recommendation, two (2) additional conditions were added to the project; (1) add guidelines for the marketing of the affordable units that will provide a preference to San Dimas residents and employees that work in San Dimas, and (2) add a condition that the trees in the rear yards of the residents along the east side of the development, along the Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates, be maintained to provide a privacy screen between developments. The Commission requested that this condition also be incorporated into the CC&R’s. The Commission’s requests have been incorporated into the conditions of approval as Condition No’s. 9(h)(iii), 33 and 37. Additionally, Condition No. 30 has been updated to provide flexibility to the Applicant for the planting of the Oak trees along Covina Boulevard.

At the time of the Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant had not finalized the Sewer Capacity Study for the project; therefore, the following condition was included in Resolution PC1697, “The Applicant/Developer shall install sewer improvements to accommodate the proposed development to the existing 8” sewer mainline in W. Covina Boulevard and sewer improvements downstream in W. Covina Boulevard, Lone Hill Avenue and Cypress Street to provide additional capacity to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Public Works Director, L.A. County Sewer Maintenance, and L.A. County Sanitation District.” However, now that the Sewer Capacity Study has been completed and determined that the existing sewer line has capacity to facilitate the project’s needs, the Public Works Department and City Engineer have determined the additional capacity is no longer needed. The standard condition that requires the Applicant to install sewer to serve the entire development is included as part of the approval.

Notices were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site, for both the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Staff received a letter of opposition, dated October 13, 2025 from a Charter Oak resident raising concerns related to vermin displacement, traffic, noise and the removal of 40 mature trees (Attachment 11), which were similar to the concerns raised at the April 10, 2025 community meeting held at Charter Oak.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The proposed project site is 3.24 acres in size and is currently zoned SF-8000, as are the two properties to the west of the project site. The property’s Zoning and General Plan designation are Residential; therefore, the project does not require a zone change or a general plan amendment.

The Housing Crisis Act of 2019, also referred to as Senate Bill 330 (SB 330), became effective on January 1, 2020, and had an original sunset clause of January 1, 2025. However, Senate Bill 1489 extended the sunset clause of SB 330 to January 1, 2034. While the project is subject to DPRB and Planning Commission review, since it is being filed under SB 330, the project can only be reviewed against existing objective design standards. Additionally, under SB 330, the project can only be subject to five (5) meetings/hearings before it must be approved. These include DPRB, Planning Commission, and City Council. A continued hearing counts as one (1) meeting.

Density Bonus Law
The property’s current zoning of Single-Family 8,000 (SF-8000) allows up to twenty (20) units.

The project proposes a total of seven (7) residences to be restricted for low- and moderate-income households. Therefore, the project is eligible for a Density Bonus and concessions/waivers pursuant to State Density Bonus Law (DBL) (Gov. Code § 65915 et seq.). The project will include five (5) units, or 25 percent of the base unit count of the project (20 du x 0.25 = 5) for Low-income households, which will earn a 50 percent density bonus pursuant to DBL, or 10 bonus units.

Additionally, the project will include two (2) units, or 10 percent of the base unit count of the project

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 6 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
(20 du x 0.10 = 2) restricted for Moderate-income households, which will earn an additional density bonus of 32.5 percent, or 6.5 units, rounded up to seven (7) bonus units. These seven (7) bonus units will be combined with the previous ten (10) bonus units for a total density bonus of 17 units. Therefore, with the base 20 units allowed under the current zoning and the 17 density bonus units, the total development will provide 37 units. The seven (7) affordable housing units would be distributed throughout the entire project site. Additionally, pursuant to DBL, the Applicant will be required to enter into a Density Bonus Agreement (see Attachment 8) with the City, which is required by Condition No. 36.

Table 1: Breakdown of Residential Units
Single-Family 8,000 (SF-8000) Zone 20 units
50% Density Bonus for Low-Income Units 10 bonus units (5 units Low-Income)

32.5% Density Bonus for Moderate-Income Units 7 bonus units (2 Moderate-Income) Total # of Units 37 units
A developer who meets the requirements of DBL is entitled to a density bonus as a matter of right.

State Law requires cities to approve an increase in density for affordable housing projects without requiring approval of a General Plan Amendment or Zone Change, as long as the development complies with DBL.

In addition to the density bonus, the City is also required by State law to provide incentives or concessions. The City is required to grant concessions which reduce development standards or remove regulatory constraints which result in increased costs to the developer. The number of incentives or concessions that may be requested is based on the percentage of affordable units in the project as outlined below.

Table 2: Number of Incentives/Concessions Allowed
No. of Incentives/
Concessions
Very Low-Income
Percentage
Lower Income
Percentage
Moderate Income
Percentage
1 5% 10% 10%
2 10% 17% 20%
3 15% 24% 30%
4 100% Low/Very Low/Mod
(20% Moderate allowed)
100% Low/Very Low/Mod
(20% Moderate allowed)
100% Low/Very Low/Mod
(20% Moderate allowed)
Since the project will reserve five (5) units, or 25 percent of the base unit count of the project (20 du x 0.25 = 5) restricted for Low-income households, the Applicant may request up to three (3) incentives or concessions. These concessions must be granted unless the City finds that the proposed concessions do not result in identifiable cost reductions, would cause a public health or safety problem, cause an environmental problem, harm a historical property or would be contrary to law. The City has the burden of proof in the event it declines to grant any requested concession.

However, DBL does not require that the City grant an incentive that is a request for direct financial assistance or a waiver of fees.

Pursuant to DBL and based on the percentage of affordability included in this project, the applicant is entitled to three incentives or concessions. The applicant has requested three (3) incentives/concessions, which include the following:

1. Reduction in roadway width standards from 54 feet to 34 feet.

2. Replacement trees to be no larger than 15-gallon sized trees.

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 7 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025

3. Issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits prior to final map recordation.

With respect to the third request above, City Staff is recommending approval of the demolition and grading permit portion of the DBL incentive request. The issuance of building permits under the DBL incentive request would allow commencement of construction of buildings for sale prior to Final Map recordation. This is prohibited by the Subdivision Map Act/Government Code Section 66499.30(a), which provides:
“No person shall sell, lease, or finance any parcel or parcels of real property or commence construction of any building for sale, lease or financing thereon, except for model homes…until the final map thereof in full compliance with this division and any local ordinance has been filed for record by the recorder of the county in which any portion of the subdivision is located.”
Therefore, the building permits may be issued when the Final Map has been filed by the Los Angeles County Recorder’s office for recordation. Condition No. 34 has been incorporated into the project approval identifying the incentives that have been granted to the applicant.

In addition to incentives or concessions, density bonus projects are also entitled to waivers of development standards. The City may not apply development standards which would physically preclude the construction of the project at its permitted density. DBL does provide some discretion when it comes to waivers, but only under specific limited circumstances. Cities must demonstrate, with substantial evidence, that granting the requested waivers would create a specific negative impact on the public’s health and safety that cannot be mitigated. The requested waivers are discussed later in the report under the Development Standards discussion.

Site Layout/Infrastructure Improvements
The residential project will be accessed from W. Covina Boulevard via a new private driveway.

The property currently has two existing driveways, which will be removed. In addition, the existing median U-turn in front of the project site along W. Covina Boulevard will be removed as part of the proposed site access modifications. One new 34-foot-wide private driveway will be constructed, which will provide the primary access to the site. The Applicant has already obtained approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department for the proposed site access and will be required to install one public fire hydrant along Covina Boulevard and one private fire hydrant located near the center of the private common driveway. Additionally, a new raised median will be constructed on W. Covina Boulevard to prohibit vehicles exiting the project site from turning left on W. Covina Boulevard. Therefore, access to the Project will be provided only through a right-in, right-out configuration at the proposed project driveway to improve safety and maintain consistent traffic operations along the corridor (Figure 3).

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 8 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Figure 3 – Circulation overview.

Of the total 37 residential units, 22 of the units will have their own private driveway. These units are all located along the eastern portion of the site abutting the Charter Oak Mobile Home Park Estates community and some within the four (4) motor courts. The remaining 22 units are designed to be clustered around four (4) motor courts along the western portion of the site abutting New Song Church (see Figures 4 - 6 & Attachment 3, Project Plans).

Figure 4 – Site Plan/Conceptual Landscape Plan
Figure 5 – Conceptual Rendering of View Covina Blvd. entrance into residential development.

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 9 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Grading and Fencing
The subject site currently sits slightly lower than the adjacent property to the east (Charter Mobile Home Park Estates) and slightly higher than the adjacent property to the west (New Song Church). Site grading will require an estimated import of 2,239 cubic yards. The entrance into the residential development will be designed to be at grade with W. Covina Boulevard. The existing site is comprised of two relatively flat areas at the back and front of the site and a more steeply sloped area in the middle. The lower area was previously utilized by a commercial nursery, and the upper area is where the two residences, garage, and barn are located. There is an approximate grade difference of twenty feet from the front (south) property line toward the rear (north) property line. To allow for level lots and proper drainage, the parcels will be graded to be slightly lower along the east property line to prevent any cross drainage to adjacent properties and to allow for proper drainage throughout the development. Consequently, there will be retaining walls constructed at varying heights along the west, north, and east property lines (see Attachment 3, Project Plans). Along the west property line, the retaining wall height will vary from two (2) feet to six (6) feet with a proposed wrought iron fence above. Along the north property line abutting the Southern Pacific Railroad line, there is a proposed retaining wall with a maximum height of three (3) feet and a proposed sound wall with a minimum height of six (6) feet. The Applicant is in consultation with Metrolink and is continuing to review the sound wall issue along the rail right-of-way to ensure that the new residences are protected. The final sound wall height is projected to be up to 12’-0” in height. The height of all wrought iron fencing above the perimeter retaining walls will not be greater than six (6) feet. All proposed block walls will be decorative, tansplit face with matching finish cap.

The plans show the interior fences separating the individual lots along the eastern half of the development fronting onto a motor court will primarily be comprised of white vinyl fencing with a maximum height of six (6) feet. For the residential units located on the western half of the development that have their own private driveway, the interior fences separating the lots will be comprised of 6-foot-high white vinyl fencing atop retaining walls of varying heights. Although the plans still show the interior fences separating the individual lots are proposed to be white vinyl fencing, the applicant recently agreed to construct all the interior fences out of tan-split face block, the gates will still be vinyl, which staff is agreeable too. Tract housing developments have historically required all walls to be decorative block with gates being constructed with alternative materials. Staff has added Condition No. 13 requiring that all walls be decorative, tan-split space block with finished cap.

Figure 6 – Conceptual Rendering of residences clustered around a motor court.

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 10 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Concerns were raised at the April 10, 2025, community information session regarding the existing condition of the property line block wall abutting the project and the Charter Oak Mobile Home Park Estates community. The Applicant’s structural engineer met staff onsite on April 28, 2025, to visually inspect the existing property line wall. On May 12, 2025, the Applicant’s engineer provided City Staff with a letter indicating that the existing wall damage was observed to likely stem from footing settlement or tree roots with a recommendation that the damaged portion of the wall be replaced/repaired. Staff has added Condition No. 20 to require at a minimum, 30 lineal feet of the northwest corner of the wall between the subject property and the Charter Oak Mobile Home Park Estates property be replaced with a new block wall to match the existing wall.

House Design
Three (3) different floor plans are being proposed for the project. Each floor plan is a two-story residence and will have three (3) different exterior treatments; Spanish style, Prairie style, and Farmhouse style, to provide a variety among the residences (see Attachment 3, Project Plans).

Each floor plan will also have an option to have an additional fourth or fifth bedroom on the second floor in lieu of the loft area. Additionally, an area for refuse storage is being provided on the first floor of each plan type within the garage area. The table below provides an overview for each plan. There will be 15 residential units designed as Plan 1, 13 residential units designed as Plan 2, and the remaining 9 residential units designed as Plan 3.

Table 3: Unit Plans
Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3
Floor Area 1,812 sq. ft.
w/61 sq. ft. porch & 48 sq.ft.
2,002 sq. ft.
w/21 sq. ft. porch
2,197 sq. ft.

Bedrooms 3 or 4 3 or 4 4 or 5
Bathrooms 2 w/powder room 2 w/powder room 3
Garage 477 sq. ft.
2 cars
459 sq. ft.
2 cars
472 sq. ft.
2 cars
Proposed
Quantity 15 13 9
Plan 1 has a layout which provides for 1,812 square feet of floor area, a 61 square-foot front porch, a 48 square-foot rear patio area, and a 477 square-foot two-car garage. Plan 2 has a layout which provides for 2,002 square feet of floor area, a 21 square-foot front porch, and a 459 squarefoot two-car garage. Lastly, Plan 3 has a layout which provides for 2,197 square feet of floor area, and a 472 square-foot two-car garage. Plans 1 & 2 include three (3) bedrooms and 2.5 baths, with a primary bedroom with an en suite bathroom and walk-in closet. Plan 3 includes four (4) bedrooms and three (3) baths, with a primary bedroom with an en suite bathroom and walk-in closet. The bedrooms for each of the three (3) plans are all located on the second floor.

There are three (3) varied color schemes for each of the architectural styles (see Attachment 3, Project Plans), which will help provide some architectural variety throughout the development.

The front elevations of each of the plan types will feature decorative shutters designed appropriately for the three different architectural styles. The Spanish style features an exterior stucco finish with decorative gable end vents, corbels, and arched soffits throughout the house design. These elements in addition to the S-tile roofing help to break up the building façade. The Prairie style features horizontal lap siding, a hipped roof design, decorative brick veneer wainscot, and wooden porch posts. The Farmhouse style features vertical board and batten siding,

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 11 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
decorative stone veneer wainscot, and gable end vents with foam trim that matches all of the windows.

Figures 7 through 12 show the proposed elevations for each of the plan types.

Figure 7 – Plan 1; Spanish (top left), Prairie (top right), and Farmhouse (bottom) Figure 8 – Plan 2; Spanish (left), Prairie (right)

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 12 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Figure 10 – Plan 3A;
Spanish
Figure 11 – Plan 3B; Prairie
Figure 9 – Plan 2; Farmhouse

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 13 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
Development Standards
As mentioned earlier in the staff report, the Applicant submitted their application pursuant to DBL which allows the Applicant to ask for waivers to deviate from the Code’s development standards.

At this time, the Applicant is asking to reduce/deviate from the following development standards:
• Lot size
• Lot dimensions
• Setbacks
• Lot coverage
• Off-street parking
• RV storage
• Street width
Table 4 below summarizes the various development standards that the Applicant has requested to reduce/deviate from.

Table 4. Requested Waivers/Concessions of Development Standards Description Code Standard DBL Request

1. Lot Size 8,000 sq. ft. minimum 2,190 sq. ft. minimum 2,800 sq. ft. average

2. Density/Lot Size Density based on lot sizes
and shall be determined by
dividing net usable area of
the parcel to be subdivided
by the required lot area
Overall density shall be equal to 37
dwelling

3. Lot Dimensions 70 ft. minimum lot width 35 ft. minimum lot width

4. Setbacks
a. Front 20 ft. minimum 2 ft. minimum at cluster motor courts; 18 ft. at driveways
b. Side 12 ft. minimum at driveway
side; 5 ft. minimum at
opposite side
2 ft. minimum at driveways; 4 ft. minimum
at interior side
Figure 12 – Plan 3C; Farmhouse

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 14 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
c. Corner 10 ft. minimum at corner
side; 5 ft. minimum at interior
side
2 ft. minimum at driveways; 4 ft. minimum
at interior side

5. Lot Coverage 35 percent maximum 65 percent maximum

6. Off-Street
Parking
a. No structure for parking
purposes shall be located
closer than 20 feet to the
property line
No structure for parking purposes shall be
located closer than 2 feet to the property
line
b. Single-family residences: 2
car garage per unit
Condominiums, townhomes
and other similar
complexes; 2 garage
spaces per unit, plus 1
noncovered space for each
additional bedroom beyond
2 bedrooms per unit, plus 1
guest space for each 3 units
Project requires a total of
170 parking spaces
Pursuant to Density Bonus law, Inclusive
of parking for persons with a disability and
guests, parking ratios shall be 1.5 onsite
parking spaces for 3-bedroom units and

2.5 onsite parking spaces for 4-bedroom
units
Applicant is proposing 137 parking spaces
• Further explanation in the staff report.

7. RV Storage Such storage space shall be
located behind the main
building line, within the
interior side yard, or in the
rear yard…not less than 10’-
0” x 25’-0” long
No storage space shall be required on any
lot or parcel for RV’s, trailers, boats, or
camper shells.

Condition No. 35 is incorporated into the project approval identifying all of the waivers that have been granted to the applicant.

Parking
Under the City’s current parking requirements, the project would be required to provide 170 parking spaces. However, the Applicant is providing parking consistent with DBL contained in (Gov. Code § 65915(p)(1), which states that upon the request of the developer, a city, county, or city and county shall not require a vehicular parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, that exceeds the following ratios:

According to the above ratios, if each plan type is built to maximize the number of bedrooms, the project would be required to provide 93 total parking spaces as outlined in Table 6.

Table 5. Density Bonus Parking Ratios
Unit Type Spaces Required
Studio to 1 Bedroom 1 Space
2 to 3 Bedrooms 1.5 Spaces
4+ Bedrooms 2.5 Spaces

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 15 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
While Density Bonus law only requires the Applicant to provide a total of 93 spaces, there will be 137 parking spaces provided upon project completion. Parking spaces are distributed throughout the project as shown in Figure 13. These parking spaces are comprised of 74 garage parking spaces, 44 driveway parking spaces, seven (7) noncovered parking spaces located within the motor courts, and 12 parallel parking spaces located along the private common driveway/fire lane.

Figure 13 – Guest Parking Display Plan
Tree Removal
The proposed development will require the removal of 143 trees; 40 mature trees and 103 trees which do not meet the minimum size criteria set forth in the San Dimas Municipal Code. Of the 40 mature trees, there are twenty (20) Coast Live Oak, and the remaining twenty (20) trees are comprised of Ash, Fig, Cypress, Olive, Pine, Eucalyptus, Pecan, and Cedar (see Attachment 6, Arborist Report). All the trees need to be removed due to the regrading of the site. In addition, the trees would be in the location of new residences, sidewalk, streets or fences; therefore, removal is required. The Applicant has provided a landscape plan that proposes 82 new trees, each a minimum of 15-gallon in size to be replanted throughout the development (see Attachment 3, Project Plans). The Tree Preservation Ordinance specifies “tree relocation and/or two for one replacement with minimum fifteen-gallon box tree(s), or other replacement of equivalent value and size” be required within the subject property. As part of the Applicant’s incentive request under DBL, the Applicant requested that replacement trees be no larger than 15-gallon sized Table 6. DBL Parking Requirements
Plan Type Plan Type Parking
Quantity
Unit Type
w/max option Parking Ratio Required Spaces
1 15 3 to 4 Bedrooms 2.5 Spaces/unit 37.5
2 13 3 to 4 Bedrooms 2.5 Spaces/unit 32.5
3 9 4 to 5 Bedrooms 2.5 Spaces/unit 22.5
TOTAL 93

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 16 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025
trees. Staff has granted the requested incentive since the Applicant is meeting the tree replacement requirements of two (2) replacement trees for each mature tree removed.

The 82 trees to be replanted are spread throughout the project site, with a minimum of one (1) tree planted in the rear yard of each of the lots abutting the east and west property line. The remaining trees are located along front yard/side yard abutting the private common driveway and along W. Covina Boulevard.

At its April 24, 2025, regular meeting, the DPRB requested a revision to Condition No. 30 to include the incorporation of a minimum of six (6) Oak trees to be planted along W. Covina Boulevard as part of the required tree replacement. The request was made due to the fact that half of the 40 mature trees that are proposed for removal are Coast Live Oaks, and the proposed tree replacements did not include any Oaks. The Applicant agreed to the revised condition and stated that they would work with their arborist on the location of the proposed Oak trees.

Additionally, at the request of the Applicant’s CEQA consultant, Condition No. 19 was added to require a preconstruction clearance survey if removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potential nesting habitat were scheduled within the avian nesting season (February 1 to September 15).

This will ensure that no nesting birds adjacent to the construction area will be disturbed during construction. If nesting birds are found, an avoidance buffer no less than 300 feet shall be implemented around the nest until all young have fledged and the nest is confirmed by a qualified biologist to be no longer active.

Historic Resource
As mentioned earlier in the staff report, the subject property is currently developed with a twostory Queen Anne style residence built in 1901 with an ancillary barn, and a single-story ranch style residence built in 1964 with an ancillary garage and apartment. The 1901 residential structure and barn are listed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory. The proposed development of the site for the construction of 37 detached single-family residences will require the demolition of the Queen Anne style residence and ancillary barn on the property. The Applicant submitted a Historic Resource Analysis (see Attachment 7), which evaluates all of the structures on the property for significance and eligibility under the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and to determine if the property qualifies as a historical resource pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Although the Queen Anne residence appears to be a unique example of a Queen Anne style residence dating to the early days of San Dimas; the building lacks the necessary integrity to make it eligible for the CRHR. The structure has experienced multiple alterations including several additions and porch enclosures, roofline changes, and some window changes over the years. Consequently, the property does not qualify as a historical resource under CEQA.

Condition No. 8 has been included to require the Applicant/Developer to complete a Level II Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) documentation package for the 1901 Queen Anne residence to ensure that the documentation is available for future study as indicated in the submitted Historic Resource Analysis for the project.

ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives proposed for this request.

TTM 24-05 (84582), DPRB 24-14, and TP 24-28; PROJ-22-0053 Page 17 For the Meeting of October 28, 2025

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA guidelines, Title 14, Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects, Class 32. The proposed Project qualifies for a Class 32 Exemption because the project meets the following five requirements:
a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services The Applicant retained an environmental consultant to prepare an exemption checklist to fully analyze the project in relation to these criteria. The CEQA Exemption Checklist prepared for the project is included as Attachment 5, which further explains how the project qualifies as an infill exemption using relevant technical studies to inform discussion. Based upon the analysis in the attached checklist, the proposed project will not have any potentially significant effect on the environment and is eligible for exemption from CEQA.

Respectfully submitted,
Anne Moore
Senior Planner
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2025-55

2. Tentative Tract Map 84582

3. Project Plans

4. Property Photos

5. CEQA Exemption Checklist

6. Arborist Report

7. Historic Resource Analysis

8. Draft Affordable Housing Covenant and Density Bonus Agreement

9. Planning Commission Staff Report, Resolution PC-1697 & Minutes, July 17, 2025

10. DPRB Staff Report & Minutes, April 24, 2025

11. Public Comment

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2025-55

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24-05 (TTM 84582), DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW NO. 24-14, TREE PERMIT NO. 24-28, AND ASSOCIATED DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT ; THE PROPOSED

PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES, TITLE 14, ARTICLE 19 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS, SECTION 15332, IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, CLASS 32. A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 3.24 ACRE PROPERTY INTO SIXTEEN (16) NUMBERED LOTS AND THREE (3) LETTER LOTS TO BE DEVELOPED WITH 37 DETACHED TWO-STORY
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, WHICH INCLUDE SEVEN (7) AFFORDABLE

HOUSING UNITS, THE DEMOLITION OF TWO RESIDENCES, BARN,
GARAGE, AND THE REMOVAL OF 40 MATURE PROTECTED TREES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 901 W. COVINA BOULEVARD (APN: 8385-006- 027) WITHIN THE SINGLE-FAMILY 8,000 (SF-8000) ZONE.

WHEREAS, an application was duly filed for Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), Development Plan Review 24-14, Tree Permit 24-28 by:

Timothy Sales of RC Homes, Inc. on behalf of Hagen-Renaker, Inc. 550 N. Larchmont Blvd. Suite 201
Los Angeles, CA 90004
WHEREAS, the Project is described as:

A request to subdivide a 3.24 acre property into sixteen (16) numbered lots and three (3) letter lots to be developed with 37 detached two-story single-family residences, which include seven (7) affordable housing units in compliance with Density Bonus Law, and the demolition of two residences, garage, barn, and the associated removal of 40 mature trees located at 901 W.

Covina Blvd. within the Single-Family 8000 zone. (APN: 8385-006-027); and WHEREAS, the residential development Project applies to the following described real property:
901 W. Covina Boulevard (APN: 8385-006-027); and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has filed an application pursuant to Density Bonus law to construct an additional 17 units, exceeding the max density of 20 units, in exchange for the development of five (5) low-income and two (2) moderate-income units, and various waivers of development standards that would preclude development of the project as proposed along with three (3) development incentives to reduce project costs.

WHEREAS, the Development Plan Review Board, at a regularly held and noticed meeting on April 24, 2025, heard evidence and recommended approval of Development Plan Review No. 24-14 and Tree Permit No. 24-28 to the Planning Commission; and

Resolution 2025-55 Page 2
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
WHEREAS, the Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (84582) was submitted to all appropriate agencies as required under Section 17.12.030 of the San Dimas Municipal Code with a request for their report and recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received the report and recommendation of such agencies as have submitted information including the written report and recommendation of Staff; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regularly scheduled and noticed public meeting on July 17, 2025, heard evidence and adopted Resolution PC-1697, recommending approval to the City Council of Tentative Tract Map 24-05, Development Plan Review No. 24-14 and Tree Permit No. 24-28; and
WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the City Council public hearing on the matter and that public hearing was held on October 28, 2025 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., with all testimony received being made a part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the consideration of whether the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The project is hereby determined to be Categorically Exempt per Section 15332 Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects, of the State CEQA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the evidence received at the hearing, and for the reasons discussed by the City Council at the hearing, and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached as “Exhibit A”, the City Council now finds as follows:

Tentative Tract Map Findings:

A. That the proposed tract map is consistent with the General Plan and the applicable Land Use Zone.

The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 84582 is consistent with the City of San Dimas General Plan Land Use Designation of Single Family Low, which is intended to provide for single family detached units. The proposed Project will have a density of 11.4 units per acre and consist of 37 detached two-story single-family residences. The project exceeds the allowable density of six dwelling units per acre; however, it is consistent with the allowable density allowed based upon the State Density Bonus Law.

The Proposed Project and map are consistent with the General Plan as follows:

Land Use Element Goal L-4: Plan and create an urban form that efficiently utilizes urban infrastructure and services. Plan for orderly growth rather than “leap frog” development.

Objective 4.1: Promote future land use and development patterns which reduce costs of infrastructure construction, encourages transit to make better use of existing facilities, and achieve a good match between future growth and phasing of existing facilities or expansion of new ones.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 3
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
Objective 4.2: Consider each development proposal in a larger development context.

Understand how each development contributes to city-wide impacts and contributes to certain capacity thresholds for circulation, community services and utilities.

Housing Element Goal 2: Provide adequate housing sites to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment.

Policy 2.1 Adequate Sites: Provide opportunities for new housing that responds to community needs in terms of housing type, cost, and location by providing appropriate zoning and development standards.

Policy 2.3 Design Quality: Continue to encourage housing designs, site planning, landscaping, and architectural features consistent with the General Plan, design standards, and community context.

B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and the applicable Land Use Zone.

The design of the proposed residences have been reviewed and approval recommended by the Development Plan Review Board and will uphold the high design standards found throughout San Dimas as well as fit into the architectural themes found in the community. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is located within a permitted residential use area with infrastructure and utilities readily available to serve the future development. In addition, the proposed Tentative Tract Map will be compatible with the uses that surround the Project site.

The proposed 37 detached two-story single-family residences will help San Dimas meet its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goals and will give both San Dimas residents and prospective residences with additional housing opportunities.

C. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.

The project site is physically suitable for the proposed developments. The approximately 3.24- acre site is adequate in size for the proposed 37 detached two-story single-family residences.

All on-site and off-site improvements proposed as part of the project’s design will meet all City standards with the approval of a Density Bonus Agreement and will provide a safe environment for future residents after development. The site can adequately accommodate the proposed private driveway, adequate vehicular and emergency vehicle access, and the additional private fire hydrant as required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department.

D. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The property is located within the Single Family Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan. The land use designation is intended for the development of projects of up to 6 dwelling units per acre. The project exceeds this density; however, it is consistent with the allowable density allowed based upon the State Density Bonus Law. The proposed subdivision is surrounded by residential uses to the east and west, and non-residential uses to the north and south; therefore, the proposed infill development would be compatible with the existing fabric of the neighborhood and infrastructure can be extended to the Project site to serve the new residences.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 4
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat.

The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements will not cause substantial damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project is located within an urbanized area and is surrounded by residential development to the east and west, and non-residential development to the north and south. An exemption checklist was prepared to fully analyze the project in relation to CEQA guidelines criteria for an exemption based on Section 15332. Based upon the analysis in the checklist, the proposed project will not have any potentially significant effect on the environment and is eligible for exemption from CEQA. The Project site consists of 37 detached two-story single-family residences with vehicular access from a private driveway off of Covina Boulevard. The development of the residences will not destroy or damage any viable wildlife nor, per the prepared CEQA Exemption Checklist, cause harm to any protected species. As such, it is anticipated that the proposed Project will not cause a substantial environmental injury to wildlife or their habitat.

F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project is located in an area primarily developed by residential and non-residential uses. The project is designed with improvements that meet all City and State building and fire codes, and no offensive emissions or odors will be associated with the residential development. The project will add sidewalks along the southern portion of the project, creating a safer environment for new and existing residents.

G. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at-large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.

The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The Tract Map provides necessary easements for utilities and access, and the applicant/developer shall be responsible for installing or repairing associated street improvements such as curb, gutter, and sidewalk consistent with the City requirements, if necessary at the time of construction.

Development Plan Review Board Findings
A. The development of the site in accordance with the development plan is suitable for the use or development intended.

The proposed project includes the subdivision of a 3.24-acre site to be developed with 37 detached two-story single-family residences, which include seven (7) affordable units along with the associated removal of 40 mature trees and the demolition of four structures, two of which are identified in the city’s historic resources inventory; a Queen Anne style residence and ancillary barn. The current zoning for the subject site is Single-Family 8,000. The subject site is adequate in size for the proposed development. In addition, the development will be constructed to comply under the provisions of Density Bonus Law.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 5
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
B. The total development is so arranged as to avoid traffic congestion, ensure the public health, safety and general welfare, and prevent adverse effects on neighboring property.

The proposed development is part of an overall development that included several entitlement applications, which included but not limited to a Tentative Tract Map (TTM). The TTM was designed to accommodate a private common driveway and adequate vehicular and emergency vehicle access as required by the City Engineer, Public Works Department, and LA County Fire Department. In addition, the homes will be constructed in a manner that will not impact public health, safety, general welfare and will prevent adverse effects on neighboring properties. In particular, the proposed development will comply with the requirements of Density Bonus Law.

C. The development is consistent with all elements of the general plan and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of the zoning code and other ordinances and regulations of the City.

The proposed development will be in compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use designation of Single Family Low and the Housing Element as follows:

Land Use Element Goal L-4: Plan and create an urban form that efficiently utilizes urban infrastructure and services. Plan for orderly growth rather than “leap frog” development.

Objective 4.1: Promote future land use and development patterns which reduce costs of infrastructure construction, encourages transit to make better use of existing facilities, and achieve a good match between future growth and phasing of existing facilities or expansion of new ones.

Objective 4.2: Consider each development proposal in a larger development context.

Understand how each development contributes to city-wide impacts and contributes to certain capacity thresholds for circulation, community services and utilities.

Housing Element Goal 2: Provide adequate housing sites to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment.

Policy 2.1 Adequate Sites: Provide opportunities for new housing that responds to community needs in terms of housing type, cost, and location by providing appropriate zoning and development standards.

Policy 2.3 Design Quality: Continue to encourage housing designs, site planning, landscaping, and architectural features consistent with the General Plan, design standards, and community context.

Tree Removal Findings
A. It is reasonable to remove the trees because the continued existence at the location prevents the reasonable development of the subject property.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 6
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
The 40 protected trees that are proposed for removal prevent the reasonable development of the property. The majority of the trees are located along the northern half of the property and conflict with the proposed locations for the 37 two-story detached single-family residences.

Therefore, removal of all 40 protected trees is warranted. As required by the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance, the Applicant will be required to plant a minimum of 80 replacement canopy-type trees that are at minimum 15-gallon in size as part of the approval. The approval will also require some Oak trees to be planted along Covina Boulevard to further mitigate the removal of the mature trees.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, that the City Council of the City of San Dimas grants approval of Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), Development Plan Review Board No. 24-14, Tree Permit 24-28, and the associated Density Bonus Agreement, subject to the Applicant’s compliance with Conditions of Approval in Exhibit A.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, this 28th day of October, 2025. ____________________________________
Emmett G. Badar, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Black, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §

CITY OF SAN DIMAS )
I, DEBRA BLACK, CITY CLERK of the City of San Dimas, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2025-55. It was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the San Dimas City Council on the 28th, day of October, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Debra Black, City Clerk

Resolution 2025-55 Page 7
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval for
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14 and Tree Permit 24-28; SB 330 & Density Bonus Law; ACCELA PROJ-24-0053
A request to approve the subdivision, filed under SB 330, of one (1) existing parcel into 19 new parcels (TTM 84582) to be developed with a total of 37 detached two-story single-family residences, which include seven (7) affordable housing units in compliance with Density Bonus Law, and the demolition of two residences, garage, barn, and the associated removal of 40 mature trees located at 901 W. Covina Boulevard within the Single-Family 8,000 Zone (APN: 8385-006- 027). Pursuant to Density Bonus Law, a density bonus of 17 units, exceeding the max density of 20 units, will be granted in exchange for the development of five (5) low-income and two (2) moderate-income units, and various waivers of development standards that would preclude development of the project as proposed will be granted, along with three (3) development incentives to reduce project costs
PLANNING DIVISION - (909) 394-6250

GENERAL

1. The Applicant/Developer shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers or employees because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers or employees for any Court costs and attorney’s fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.

The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve Applicant of his obligations under this condition.

2. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for any City Attorney costs incurred by the City for the project, including, but not limited to, consultations, and the preparation and/or review of legal documents. The Applicant shall deposit funds with the City to cover these costs in an amount to be determined by the City.

3. Copies of the signed City Council Resolution of Approval No. ***** and the Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.

4. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with all Zoning Ordinances applicable to the project/request.

5. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval as approved by the City Council on October 28, 2025.

6. The Applicant/Developer shall sign an affidavit accepting all Conditions and all Standard Conditions prior to Final Map recordation.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 8
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025

7. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with all City of San Dimas Business License requirements and shall provide a list of contractors and subcontractors that are subject to business license requirements.

8. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for completing a Level II Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) documentation package for the 1901 Queen Anne residence to ensure that the documentation is available for future study as indicated in the submitted Historic Resource Analysis for the project. The HABS shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of demolition permits.

9. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for the preparation of Covenant, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) establishing a Homeowner’s Association and budget for the maintenance and operation of the common areas, including but not limited to, private streets, project entry gates, landscaping, open space, water quality basins, drainage systems, and retention/detention basins. The Applicant/ Developer shall submit the CC&R’s for review by the Planning Division and the City Attorney. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for all City Attorney and staff costs incurred by the City during the review of the CC&R’s. The CC&R’s shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, and shall make the City a party thereto, and shall provide the City the right to enforce the CC&R’s. The CC&R’s shall be completed and recorded prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the Final Map.

The CC&R’s shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CC&R’s shall be prepared at the developer’s/property owner’s sole cost and expense.
b. The CC&R’s shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents.
c. The CC&R’s shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all easement areas and facilities. d. The CC&R’s shall provide that the property be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
e. The CC&R’s shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the revised CC&R’s, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner’s sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R’s or the City’s ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
f. The CC&R’s shall include any provision specific as project features and or mitigation measures as appropriate and shall include an approved building envelope of each pad.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 9
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
g. The CC&R’s shall include provisions for architectural design guidelines and enforcement thereof.
h. In addition to the above, the CC&R’s shall include the following:
i. The Declaration shall contain language and an exhibit showing exactly what areas are to be maintained in perpetuity by the Homeowner’s Association. ii. The Declaration shall contain language prohibiting antenna towers and satellite dish antennas unless permitted by local ordinance and a plan is approved by the Homeowner’s Association and the Director of Community Development, showing the location and screening from adjacent residents. iii. The Declaration shall contain language for maintenance of the trees in the rear yards of the residences along the east end of the development along the Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates to provide a privacy screen between developments.
i. The CC&R’s shall include maintenance requirements of LID devices and are subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the City Attorney (Public Works). j. The CC&R’s shall include a solid waste disposal operations plan and include access easement for the City Waste Hauler to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and City Attorney.

10. Prior to the start of construction, the Applicant/Developer shall install a minimum five-foot (5’) high chain-link fence or other approved material which shall have a dark green or black colored view obscuring screen. The fence shall totally enclose the project site when vacant, under construction, or under demolition and said fence shall remain until occupancy is granted.

11. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours.

12. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a construction access and staging plan, and schedule for the development of all lots for the Director of Community Development and Public Works approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, NPDES and security fencing.

13. Decorative block walls (tan-split face) with decorative finished cap, shall be constructed along the project perimeter, interior walls between residences, and for all retaining walls. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Applicant/Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project’s perimeter.

14. During grading and construction phases, the construction manager shall serve as the contact person in the event that dust or noise levels become disruptive to local residents. A sign shall be posted at the project site with the contact phone number.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 10
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025

15. Residential projects of five or more units shall comply with the state Model Ordinance adopted pursuant to the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991 (AB341). This shall include adequate, accessible, and convenient areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials. A residential recycling program shall be implemented in coordination with the trash company. Program shall include weekly collection of recyclable material using any combination of bins or 96-gallon waste containers in sufficient numbers to contain recyclables generated each week by all units.

16. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours from the project site.

17. All parking provided shall meet the requirements of Section 18.156 of the San Dimas Municipal Code other than the standards that have been requested to be waived.

18. The Applicant/Developer shall perform vermin control and eradication of the subject site prior to commencing the removal of the trees and vegetation and commencement of grading. Verification of the process shall be submitted to the Building Division prior to the issuance of a demotion and/or grading permit.

19. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) during the nesting bird season of February 1 through September 15 to ensure impacts to nesting birds and raptors, which may use vegetation on or near the Project site for nesting, during construction would not occur. A preconstruction clearance survey will be required for nesting birds to be completed no more than 3 days prior to ground disturbance if removal of trees is scheduled during the nesting bird season.

20. The Applicant/Developer shall remove the first 30 lineal feet of the northwest corner of the wall between the subject property and the Charter Oak Mobile Home Park Estates property and replace with a new block wall to match the existing wall. Applicant/Developer shall notify, by mail, the residents of the Charter Oak Mobile Home Park Estates at least 30 days prior to the removal of the existing wall.

DESIGN

21. Building architecture and site plan shall be consistent with plans presented to the Development Plan Review Board on April 24, 2025, the Planning Commission on July 17, 2025, and the City Council on October 28, 2025, provided that the Director of Community Development is authorized to make revisions consistent with the San Dimas Municipal Code.

22. Plans for all exterior design features, including, but not limited to, doors, windows, mailboxes and architectural treatments, shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval before issuance of building permits.

23. The lighting fixture design shall complement the architectural program. Location and type of exterior lighting fixtures shall be submitted by the developer to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to installation.

24. Gas meters, backflow prevention devices and other ground-mounted mechanical or electrical equipment installed by the Applicant/Developer shall be inconspicuously located and screened, as approved by the Director of Community Development. Location of this equipment shall be clearly noted on landscape construction documents.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 11
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025

25. All exterior building colors shall match the color and material boards on file with the Planning Division. Any revision to the approved building colors shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval.

26. New electrical panels and sub-panels shall be flush mounted for single-family developments.

27. The Applicant/Developer shall remove all existing utility poles and overhead lines on-site and underground all new utilities, and utility drops on-site to the closest power pole off-site.

LANDSCAPE

28. The Applicant/Developer shall submit to the Planning Division, prior to the issuance of building permits, detailed landscaping and automatic irrigation plans prepared by a California Licensed Landscape Professional, in addition to a $5,000 deposit for review of the plans. Water efficient landscapes shall be implemented in all new and rehabilitated landscaping in single-family and multi-family projects, and in private development projects that require a grading permit, building permit, or use permit, as required by Chapter 18.14 of the San Dimas Municipal Code. Installation of landscaping and irrigation shall be completed prior to final of the project.

29. No trees shall be removed other than those indicated on the approved set of landscape plans and identified in the submitted Arborist Report.

30. The Applicant/Developer shall work with Staff in incorporating up to six (6) Oak trees to be planted along Covina Boulevard as part of the required tree replacement. All trees to be planted on the project site shall be a minimum of 15-gallon in size, a minimum of eight (8) feet in height, with a minimum canopy span of three (3) feet. The height and span may be reduced for ornamental trees when approved by the Director of Community Development.

31. The Applicant/Developer shall make the new property owner aware in writing that they will need to submit detailed landscaping and automatic irrigation plans for the rear and side yards not landscaped as part of the original development. The plans shall be prepared by a California Licensed Landscape Professional, in addition to a $2,500 deposit for review of the plans, to the Planning Division. Water efficient landscapes shall be implemented in all new single-family projects, and in private development projects as required by Chapter

18.14 of the San Dimas Municipal Code.

32. All landscaping and automatic irrigation shall be installed and functional prior to occupancy of the building(s), in accordance with the plans approved by the Planning Division.

33. Trees shall be planted, and maintained in place, in the rear yards of the residences along the east end of the development along the Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates to provide a privacy screen between developments.

DENSITY BONUS LAW

34. The Applicant/Developer is being granted the following incentives as part of this approval:
a) Reducing the width of a private onsite street to 34 feet in width with a paved area of 26 feet;
b) Limit tree mitigation requirements to a maximum of eighty 15-gallon trees; and

Resolution 2025-55 Page 12
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
c) Allowing issuance of grading and demolition permits prior to Final Map recordation.

35. The Applicant/Developer is being granted the following waivers as part of this approval:
a) Reduction in lot size from 8,000 sq. ft. to 2,060 square feet minimum; b) Increased density allowance for the construction of 37 dwelling units instead of 20 dwelling units;
c) Reduction in lot width from 70 feet to 35 feet;
d) Reduction in front yard setback from 20 feet to 2 feet at cluster motor courts and 18 feet at driveways;
e) Reduction in side yard setbacks from 12 feet to 2 feet at driveway side and from 5 feet to 4 feet at interior side;
f) Reduction in side yard setbacks (corner lot) from 10 feet street side to 2 feet and from 5 feet to 4 feet at interior side;
g) Reduction in lot coverage from 35 percent maximum, to 65 percent maximum; h) Reduction in off-street parking requirements to 1.5 spaces for 3-bedroom units and 2.5 spaces for 4+ bedroom units;
i) Removal of RV storage space requirement; and

36. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the project, an Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Agreement, in a form approved by the City, shall be recorded against the residential development in its entirety, as deemed appropriate by the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney. The Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Agreement(s) shall ensure that the applicant and/or developer develops the required affordable housing units; five (5) low-income and two (2) moderate-income level units, and satisfies all other terms of the State Density Bonus Law, and the San Dimas Municipal Code.

37. The Applicant/Developer shall ensure that guidelines for the marketing of the affordable units include a preference to San Dimas residents and employees that work in San Dimas.

BUILDING DIVISION – (909) 394-6260

38. The plans shall be prepared in compliance with the latest edition of the codes as amended and adopted by reference by the City of San Dimas: California Green Building Standards Code, California Building Code, California Residential Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, and California Electrical Code.

39. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Energy requirements for all new lighting, insulation, and mechanical equipment and submit calculations and signed at time of initial plan review. All exterior lighting to comply with required lighting density limits, controls and BUG standards.

40. The Applicant/Developer shall submit to the Building Division of the City of San Dimas plans that have been reviewed and approved by the Los Angeles County Fire Department.  Plans may include access, fire sprinklers, mechanical ventilation, and any other applicable items regulated under the Fire Code.

41. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with the latest disabled access regulations as found in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Accessible items shall include, but not be limited to: Customize-project specific parking,

Resolution 2025-55 Page 13
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
accessible pedestrian routes, accessible/adaptable units, public/common use areas, swimming pool, stage etc.

42. All plans are required to be stamped by a California Registered Engineer or Architect unless specifically exempted by Sections 5537-5538 of the California Business & Professions Code.

43. Construction calculations, including lateral analysis, shall be required at the time plans are submitted for plan check.

44. Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing plans are required to be submitted at time of initial plan submittal. Electrical schematic and load calculations, and plumbing (drain, waste, vent, water, and gas) schematics will be required before issuance of electrical or plumbing permits.

45. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a Drainage Plan for the proposed development to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official.

46. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a Precise Grading Plan for the proposed development to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. Plans shall include a composite utility location, paving and stripping plan as well as the size of the disturbed area and the volumetric amount of cut, fill, and overexcavation.

47. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a Rough Grading Plan for the proposed development to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The Grading Plan shall conform to Appendix J of the California Building Code and shall utilize City standard notes and layout.

48. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant/Developer shall submit an updated Engineering Geology/Soils Report that includes an accurate description of the geology of the site and conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of the geologic conditions on the proposed development and include a discussion of the expansiveness of the soils and recommended measures for foundations and slabs on grade to resist volumetric changes of the soil.  This report shall also include recommendations for surcharge setback requirements in the area of ungraded slopes steeper than five horizontal to one vertical.

49. Building foundation inspections shall not be performed until a rough grading certification, location and elevation certification of the foundation forms from a California licensed surveyor, and a final soils report has been filed with the City and approved.  All drainage facilities must be operable.

50. Prior to the inspection of the foundation, the Applicant/Developer shall submit a footing bottom compaction certification by a licensed soils technician who is working under the direct supervision of the Geologist of Record.

51. Applicant to expose uninspected work started without permit for code verification at discretion of Building Inspector.

52. Fees shall be paid to Bonita Unified School District in compliance with Government Code Section 65995.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 14
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025

53. The Applicant/Developer shall Contact the Los Angeles County Public Works Department, Environmental Program Division for any required permit or clearance of industrial and hazardous waste disposal.

54. The Applicant/Developer shall Contact the Los Angeles County Sanitation District for potential fees associated with annexation, connection, or change of occupancy.

55. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with CAL Green Section 4.408.2 “Residential Mandatory Measures, Residential waste recycling” (or if applicable) 5.408.2 “Commercial Mandatory Measures, Commercial waste recycling”.

56. Prior to removing any existing structures on the property, the Applicant/Developer shall obtain clearance from SCAQMD and obtain a Demolition Permit from the Building and Safety Division.

57. The Applicant/Developer shall submit an Electrical Distribution Plan for all proposed switchgear or transformers to the City for review as soon as available.

58. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., and shall be prohibited at any time on Sundays or public holidays, per San Dimas Municipal Code Section 8.36.100.

59. Phased occupancy shall not be granted until all improvements required as part of the approval have been completed in full for each phase, and approved or finalized by the appropriate department. A phasing plan shall be submitted for approval by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.

ENGINEERING DIVISION – (909) 394-6240

60. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a Precise Grading Plan for the proposed development to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. Plans shall include composite utility locations, pavement, curb & gutter, sidewalk, driveways, lighting, signing and striping.

61. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a Rough Grading Plan for the proposed development to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The Grading Plan shall conform to Appendix J of the California Building Code and shall utilize City standard notes and layout.

62. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant/Developer shall submit an updated Engineering Geology/Soils Report that includes an accurate description of the geology of the site and conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of the geologic conditions on the proposed development and include a discussion of the expansiveness of the soils and recommended measures for foundations and slabs on grade to resist volumetric changes of the soil. This report shall also include recommendations for surcharge setback requirements in the area of ungraded slopes steeper than five horizontal to one vertical.

63. The Applicant/Developer shall provide a signed copy of the City’s certification statement declaring that the contractor will comply with Minimum Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Resolution 2025-55 Page 15
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
required by the MS4 permit for Los Angeles County as mandated by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).

64. The Applicant/Developer shall install public sanitary sewers to serve the entire development to the specifications of the City Engineer and Los Angeles County Sewer Maintenance District.

65. The Applicant/Developer shall pay any required sewer connection fees to the City of San Dimas and Los Angeles County Sewer Maintenance District prior to the issuance of a Sewer Permit.

66. The Applicant/Developer shall contact the Los Angeles County Sanitation District for any required annexation, extension, or sewer trunk fee. Proof of payment/clearance is required before the City will issue any sewer permit.

67. The Applicant/Developer shall install storm drain improvements to carry runoff of storm waters in the area proposed to be developed, and for contributory drainage from adjoining properties to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The proposed drainage improvements shall be based on a detailed Hydrology Study conforming to the current Los Angeles County methodology. The developed flows outletting into the existing downstream system(s) from this project cannot exceed the pre-existing storm flows.

68. The Applicant/Developer shall provide public utility and reciprocal access easements (fire lanes) for the development on the Tract Map to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, the Public Works Director and City Engineer.

69. The Applicant/Developer shall underground all new utilities and utility drops.

70. The Applicant/Developer shall provide street lights, street name signs, stop signs, and striping in conformance with City and CaMUTCD standards.

71. The Applicant/Developer shall provide full street improvements on all private streets and Covina Boulevard within the limits of the development. Improvements to include curbs and gutters, sidewalks, medians, driveway removals, and A.C. paving according to City standards, as shown in the following table:

Street Name
Gutter
Curb &
A.C.

Pavement
Sidewalk
Drive
Approach
Lights
Street
Street Trees
Multi-use
Trail
Median
Island
Bike Trail
Other
Covina Blvd x* x** x*** x x****
Private Streets x x x x x
Notes: * 2” Cold Plane and AC Overlay
** 8’ Wide Sidewalk with Street Trees and Tree Grates
***Curb returns shall be 35’ radius with ADA Curb Ramps

Resolution 2025-55 Page 16
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
****Median Island shall be reconstructed to full width of frontage and connected to existing island east of development

72. The Applicant/Developer shall provide mailboxes per City of San Dimas standards. Mailbox locations are subject to the approval of the local postmaster and the City Engineer.

73. The Applicant/Developer shall install public water improvements for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Golden State Water Company, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department.

74. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for any repairs within the limits of the development, including but not limited to streets and paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and street lights as determined by the City Engineer and Public Works Director.

75. The Applicant/Developer shall obtain a Public Works permit for all work within or adjacent to the public right-of-way and shall be subject to review and approval of the Public Works Director and the work shall be in accordance with applicable standards of the City of San Dimas; i.e. Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book) and the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), and further that the construction equipment ingress and egress be controlled by a plan approved by Public Works.

76. For projects that disturb one (1) acre or greater of soil, or projects that disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, the project must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity, Construction General Permit Order 2012-0006- DWQ (as amended by all future adopted Construction General Permits). The Construction General Permit requires the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Developer must submit a Notice of Intent and Waste Discharger’s Identification (WDID) number as evidence of having applied with the Construction General Permit before the City will issue a grading permit. The project proponent is ultimately responsible to comply with the requirements of Order No. 2012- 0006-DWQ, however, the City shall have the authority to enter the project site, review the project SWPPP, and require modifications and subsequent implementations to the SWPPP in order to prevent polluted runoff from leaving the project site onto public or private property.

77. For all projects subject to Low Impact Development (LID) regulations, the Applicant/Developer must submit a site-specific drainage concept and stormwater quality plan to implement LID design principles.

78. A fully executed “Maintenance Covenant for LID Requirements” shall be recorded with the L.A. County Registrar/Recorder and submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the Certificate of Occupancy. Covenant documents shall be required to include an exhibit that details the installed treatment control devices as well as any site design or source control Best Management Practices (BMPs) for post construction. The information to be provided on this exhibit shall include, but not be limited to:
i. 8 ½” x 11” exhibits with record property owner information.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 17
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025
ii. Types of BMPs (i.e., site design, source control and/or treatment control) to ensure modifications to the site are not conducted without the property owner being aware of the ramifications to BMP implementation. iii. Clear depiction of location of BMPs, especially those located below ground. iv. A matrix depicting the types of BMPs, frequency of inspection, type of maintenance required, and if proprietary BMPs, the company information to perform the necessary maintenance.
v. Calculations to support the sizing of the BMPs employed on the project shall be included in the report. These calculations shall correlate directly with the minimum treatment requirements of the current MS4 permit. In the case of implementing infiltration BMPs, a percolation test of the affected soil shall be performed and submitted for review by the City Engineer. vi. This document shall be reviewed by and concurred with Public Works to ensure the covenant complies with the MS4 Permit.

79. Improvement plans and necessary letters of credit, cash, and/or bonds to secure the construction of all public improvements shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, and the subdivision agreement and other required agreements approved by City Attorney, prior to the recordation of the Final Map.

80. A Final Map prepared by or under the direction of a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor must be processed through the City Engineer prior to being filed with the County Recorder.

81. All easements existing at the time of the Final Map approval must be accounted for on the approved Tentative Map. This includes the location, owner, purpose, and recording reference for all existing easements. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the tentative map in lieu of its location.

82. Easements for Private Driveways and Fire Lanes, and all utilities, including water and sewer shall be provided on the Final Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, City Attorney, and the Director of Community Development.

83. All site, grading, landscape & irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to the issuance of any permits.

84. A preliminary title report and guarantee is required and such document shall show all fee interest holders; all interest holders whose interest could ripen into a fee; all trust deeds, together with the name of the trustee; and all easement holders. The account for this title report should remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder.

85. The Applicant/Developer, Engineer or Surveyor shall set durable monuments to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in conformance with Section 66495 of the Subdivision Map Act. The Applicant/Developer shall also provide monumentation specified in writing by a Registered Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor of Record with accompanying security.

86. Construction parking and material storage shall be confined to the site. Construction related parking or material storage is not permitted on the surrounding streets.

Resolution 2025-55 Page 18
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025

87. The Applicant/Developer shall construct additional median improvements to close the existing median opening on Covina Boulevard and provide landscape & irrigation and hardscape improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Public Works Director.

88. The Applicant/Developer shall connect the proposed on-site storm drain improvements directly to the existing 66” storm drain in W. Covina Boulevard. On-site storm flows exceeding a 10-year frequency storm shall be retained on-site prior to outletting into the existing storm drain system.

89. The Applicant/Developer shall quitclaim the existing Southern California Edison and General Telephone Company easements traversing the site prior to the recordation of the Tract Map.

90. The Applicant/Developer shall obtain approval from the Southern California Regional Rail Authority for any proposed improvements within 10’ of their railroad right-of-way. An email from the assigned SCRRA engineer stating that no review or approvals are required from SCRRA may satisfy this condition.

91. The Applicant/Developer shall provide a 10’ wide easement within “A” Drive to the City of San Dimas for public sanitary sewer purposes on the Tract Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

PARKS & RECREATION – (909) 394-6230

92. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with City regulations regarding payment of Park, Recreation and Open Space Development Fee per SDMC Chapter 3.26. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits.

93. The Subdivision Applicant/Developer shall comply with Chapter 17.36 of the San Dimas Municipal Code regarding Park Land Dedication (Quimby Act). The City may require fees in lieu of land or a combination thereof based on the market value of the land to be dedicated. Fees shall be paid prior to recordation.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT – (323) 890-4243

94. All fire hydrants shall measure 6”x4”x2-1/2” brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and shall be installed in accordance with the 2017 County of Los Angeles Fire Code, Table B105.1.

95. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure for 2 hours.

96. Install (1) one new public fire hydrant. Location: As indicated on the Site Plan.

97. Install (1) one private on-site fire hydrant. Location: Between Units 10 and 11.

98. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, tested, and accepted prior to beginning construction. Fire Code 501.4

Resolution 2025-55 Page 19
Tentative Tract Map 24-05 (TTM 84582), DPRB 24-14, Tree Removal Permit 24-28 October 28, 2025

99. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested, and accepted prior to construction.
100. Access as noted on the Tentative and the Exhibit Maps shall comply with Title 21 (County of Los Angeles Subdivision Code) and Section 503 of the Title 32 (County of Los Angeles Fire Code), which requires an all-weather access surface to be clear to sky. 101. The driveways required for Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall be indicated on the Final Map as “Private Driveway and Fire Lane” with the widths clearly depicted. 102. The Final Map shall be submitted to Los Angeles County Fire Department for review and approval prior to recordation.
103. Fire hydrant improvement plans shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the clearance of the Final Map.

End of Conditions

845
840
835
830
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
855
833
850
845
840
835
834
833
832
831
830
836
837
840
839
841
842
843
845
844
838
847
848
846
848
855
855
856
854
852 851 850
849
850
849
848
847
846
845
844
843
842
841
840
839
838
837
850
850
850
850
829
827
846
847
848
849
844
843
852
853
851
853
849
848
847 16 14 13 12 11 10
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 15 IN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLAN PREPARED BY: UNITED CIVIL, INC. 30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301PH: (818) 707-8648FAX: (818) 707-8649 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 901 W. COVINA BLVD SHEET 1 OF 1 RC HOMES, INC. DEVELOPER: 550 N LARCHMONT BLVD., SUITE 201 LOS ANGELES, CA 90004 PHONE: (323) 450-2334 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582 LOT 16 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES NO. 84582 HAGEN-RENAKER, INC. OWNER OF RECORD: ATTN: EKATERINE (KATY) TERLINDEN, CEO P.O. BOX 41324 LONG BEACH, CA 90853 §65915 et seq) SCALE: 1" =30' 0 30 60 90
ATTACHMENT 2
11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 PLAN 3
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.5 P=834.9
P=835.5
P=835.1 P=838.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8
P=846.3 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5
P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=833.9 P=839.2 P=852.0 P=853.5
P=854.5
T LO 16
1 2 3 4
837
5 6 7 8 9 01 11 21 31 41
15 U5
PLAN PREPARED BY:

UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 PH: (818) 707-8648
FAX: (818) 707-8649 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773
901 W. COVINA BLVD
RC HOMES, INC.

DEVELOPER:
550 N LARCHMONT BLVD., SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90004
PHONE: (323) 450-2334

SITE PLAN

IN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SITE PLAN
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
FF
B
B
CC
E E
GG
D D
AA
ATTACHMENT 3





 






¾
’
’
¾
¾
’
’
¾
’
’
¾
’
’
–
’
’
’ “ ”






 







11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19
S13 to S19
S1 to S12
137
D1-2 D3-4 D5-6 D7-8 D9-10 D11-12 D13-14 D15-16 D17-18 D19-20 D21-22 D23-24 D25-26 D27-28 D29-30
D31-32 D33-34 D35-36 D37-38 D39-40 D41-42 D43-44
44 D1 to D44

GUEST PARKING DISPLAY
S13 to S19
S1 to S12
137
44 D1 to D44
12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 PLAN 3
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.5 P=834.9
P=835.5
P=835.1 P=838.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8
P=846.3 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5
P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=833.9 P=839.2 P=852.0 P=853.5
P=854.5
LOT 16
1 2 3 4
837
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
84 12 13 14
15 F
B
B
C
C
E E
G
D D
A
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19
D1-2 D3-4 D5-6 D7-8 D9-10 D11-12 D13-14 D15-16 D17-18 D19-20 D21-22 D23-24 D25-26 D27-28 D29-30
D31-32 D33-34 D35-36 D37-38 D39-40 D41-42 D43-44

GUEST PARKING DISPLAY
S13 to S19
S1 to S12
137
44 D1 to D44

12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 TOL 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 PLAN PREPARED BY:

UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 PH: (818) 707-8648
FAX: (818) 707-8649 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773
901 W. COVINA BLVD
RC HOMES, INC.

DEVELOPER:
550 N LARCHMONT BLVD., SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90004
PHONE: (323) 450-2334

CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN

IN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582

11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 PLAN 3
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.5 P=834.9
P=835.5
P=835.1 P=838.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8
P=846.3 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5
P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=833.9 P=839.2 P=852.0 P=853.5
P=854.5
T LO 16
1 2 3 4
837
5 6 7 8 9 01 11 21 31 41
15 U5
PLAN PREPARED BY:

UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 PH: (818) 707-8648
FAX: (818) 707-8649 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773
901 W. COVINA BLVD
RC HOMES, INC.

DEVELOPER:
550 N LARCHMONT BLVD., SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90004
PHONE: (323) 450-2334

SITE PLAN

IN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SITE PLAN
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
FF
B
B
CC
E E
GG
D D
AA

INSTALL ONE PRIVATE ON SITE FH

INSTALL ONE PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT
RESULTS ON FILE.

RELOCATE
County of Los Angeles
Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division
Land Development Unit

APPROVED

ACCESS REQUIREMENT ONLY
02/03/2025
County of Los Angeles
Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division
Land Development Unit
Install ___ Public
Install ___ Private
6"x 4"x 2 1/2" Fire Hydrants
Confirming to American Waterworld
Association Standard C503

REQUIRED FIRE FLOW
_____GPM @ 20PSI FOR ___ HOURS
02/03/2025
1 1
1 1.000 2

12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 PLAN 3
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.5 P=834.9
P=835.5
P=835.1 P=838.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8
P=846.3 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5
P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=833.9 P=839.2 P=852.0 P=853.5
P=854.5
T LO 16
1 2 3 4
837
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 PLAN PREPARED BY:

UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 PH: (818) 707-8648
FAX: (818) 707-8649 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773
901 W. COVINA BLVD
RC HOMES, INC.

DEVELOPER:
550 N LARCHMONT BLVD., SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90004
PHONE: (323) 450-2334

SITE PLAN

IN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SITE PLAN
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
FF
B
B
CC
E E
GG
D D
AA
137
44 Cluster A(12 carts)
Cluster B(18 carts)
Cluster C(18 carts)
Cluster D(18 carts)
SITE PLAN with SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS STAGING PLAN OVERLAY Operations Plan1) All residences provided with in garage storage space 3 carts: a) rubbish, b) recycling and c) green / organic waste2) All carts are assumed to be collected via Waste Management automated collection trucks on existing collection day (Tuesday)3) All collection is to be staged along "A" Drive as shown in above diagram4) Residents are responsible for placing and retrieving carts along "A" Drive5) In tract parking along "A" Drive will be posted "No Parking" from 6AM to 6PM on collection day to ensure that curb space is available for cart staging

11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 U
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=847 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=835 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.5 P=834.9 P=834
P=835.5
P=835.1 P=838.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8
P=846.3 P=846 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5
P=838.9 P=8 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=833.9 P=833 P=839.2 P=852.0 P=8 2 P=853.5
P=854.5
.5 35 8 =
U
P
U
=8
9 48
9 1
9 4
8 =8 P
1 2
9 8
P
P
3 38
U
=
P8
1 8
8 8
5 =84
8 P
5 46.3
60' VC
2 1
TOL 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 01 11 21 31 41
51 PLAN PREPARED BY:

UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 PH: (818) 707-8648
FAX: (818) 707-8649 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773
901 W. COVINA BLVD
RC HOMES, INC.

DEVELOPER:
550 N LARCHMONT BLVD., SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90004
PHONE: (323) 450-2334

CONCEPTUAL GRADING
& DRAINAGE PLAN

IN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
FF
BB
CC
E E
G
G
D D
AA

12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 U
P= 9.4 84 =9.4 84 =847.9 =P847 9 846 2. =P 64 8 = 44. 80 4 P 8= .0 4 4 8 = 1.8 84 = P 1 8 = P 2 840. = P 40 8 = P=838.2 P=837.3 P 83 = 836.4 = P836 =835.2 P=835 1 834. P= 834.1 P=

34.5 8 = P
P=834.5 P 8 = P=834 9. =8 P34

5.5 P=835.5
P=835.1 P=835.1 838.1 = P
5 =838. P

5. 46 8 = P46
P=847.8
3 6. 4 P=86 9 45. 8 =45.9 P8
9 45. 8 =P
5 45. 8 P=4 39.1 8 P=

9.5 3 P=89

8.9 =83 P P=8 8.53 =8 8
P=851.2 P
P=851.9
4 P=851.4 P=850.8

3.9 3 =8 P 3 P=839.2 P 8 =P852.0 =P8 2 53.5 =8 P53.5
5 4. P=85
.5 35 8 =
U
P
U
=8
9 9
48 9
1 9
4 8
8 7
8 = P
1 2
9 8
P
1 P
3 83
U
=
P8
1 8
8 1
8 5
4 =8
8 P
5 3 6. 4
VC 60'
2 1
16 T LO 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 PLAN PREPARED BY:

UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 PH: (818) 707-8648
FAX: (818) 707-8649 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773
901 W. COVINA BLVD
RC HOMES, INC.

DEVELOPER:
550 N LARCHMONT BLVD., SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90004
PHONE: (323) 450-2334

CONCEPTUAL GRADING
& DRAINAGE PLAN

IN THE CITY OF SAN DIMAS, COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84582
FF
BB
CC
E E
G
G
D D
AA

EXISTING RAILROAD
12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 PLAN 3
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.5 P=834.9
P=835.5
P=835.1 P=838.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8
P=846.3 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5
P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=833.9 P=839.2 P=852.0 P=853.5
P=854.5
OVINA BLVD.C
"A" DRIVE (PRIVATE COMMON DRIVEWAY & FIRE LANE)
10'-0"
TEL. EASEMENT
6'-0" SCE EASEMENT
10'-0" TEL EASEMENT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE: Common Area
(Common Slope Area)(CMP area)
LANDSCAPE: Private Yard
LANDSCAPE: Private Slopes

ENTRY WALKSPRIVATE DRIVEWAY
CROSSWALKSCOMMON SIDEWALK along FIRE LANE

REFERENCE LEGEND

ENHANCED ENTRY PAVING

SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY REMARKS
TREES
ACA STE Acacia salicina Willow Acacia 15 gal. 8 Low StandardARB MAR Arbuts u. 'Marina' Marina Strawberry Tree 15 gal. 12 Low Standard CER OCC Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 15 gal. 14 Low Standard LAG PAT Lagunaria patersonii Primrose Tree 15 gal. 12 Low Standard PRU CAR Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry 15 gal. 14 Mod. StandardROB PUR Robinia x ambigua `Purple Robe` Pink Flowering Locust 15 gal. 4 Low Standard TRI ELG Tristania laurina 'Elegant' Elegant Water Gum 15 gal. 18 Mod. Standard

PLANT SCHEDULE
TOTAL PROPOSED SITE TREES: 82 - 15 Gallon

WUCOLS/




 
DesignWorks
Design Works
Landscape Architecture
L.A. Group Design Works, Inc.
0 SCALE:
feet 16 32 48
1/16" = 1'-0"
NORTH
Date: 04.09.2025JOB # 4856
San Dimas, California

LANTANA
TTM: 84582: 901 W. COVINA BLVD.

Conceptual Planting Plan

BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT REMARKS
TREES
Acacia salicina / Willow Acacia 15 gal. Low
Standard
Arbuts u. 'Marina' / Marina Strawberry Tree 15 gal. Low Standard
Cercis occidentalis / Western Redbud 15 gal. Low
Standard
Lagunaria patersonii / Primrose Tree 15 gal. Low
Standard
Prunus caroliniana / Carolina Laurel Cherry 15 gal. Mod.

Standard
Robinia x ambigua `Purple Robe` / Pink Flowering Locust 15 gal. Low Standard
Tristania laurina 'Elegant' / Elegant Water Gum 15 gal. Mod.

Standard
SHRUBS
Aloe striata / Coral Aloe 5 gal LowAnigozanthos flavidus 'Big Red' / Kangaroo Paw 5 gal LowAnigozanthos x `Kanga Pink' / Kanga Pink Kangaroo Paw 1 gal Low Callistemon v. 'Little John' / Little John Weeping Bottlebrush 5 gal LowCarex divulsa / European Grey Sedge 1 gal LowChondropetalum tectorum / Cape Rush 5 gal LowCistus ladanifer / Crimson Spot Rockrose 5 gal LowCorrea x 'Ray's Tangerine' / Ray's Tangerine Australian Fuchsia 5 gal LowDianella revoluta `Baby Bliss' / Baby Bliss Flax Lily 1 gal LowDianella revoluta 'Clarity Blue' / Clarity Blue Flax Lily 5 gal LowFestuca glauca 'Elijah Blue' / Elijah Blue Fescue 1 gal LowLantana camara 'Fiesta™ Piña' / Fiesta™ Piña Lantana 5 gal LowLantana camara 'Monike' / Teenie Genie® Lantana 5 gal LowLantana montevidensis / Trailing Lantana 5 gal LowLaurus nobilis `MonRik` / Little Ragu® Sweet Bay 5 gal Low Columnar
Lavandula a. `Thumbelina Leigh` / Dwarf English Lavender 1 gal LowMuhlenbergia capillaris / Pink Muhly 5 gal LowNassella tenuissima / Mexican Feather Grass 5 gal Low Olea europaea 'Montra' / Little Ollie® Dwarf Olive 5 gal Low Penstemon h. 'Margarita BOP' / Margarita BOP Penstemon 1 gal Low Salvia greggii 'Heatwave Blaze' / Red Salvia 5 gal Low
Westringia fruticosa `Blue Gem` / Blue Gem Coast Rosemary 5 gal LowYucca filamentosa 'Color Guard' / Color Guard Adam's Needle 5 gal LowVINES Ficus pumila / Creeping Fig 5 gal MODMacfadyena unguis-cati / Yellow Trumpet Vine 5 gal LOW

PLANT SCHEDULE

BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SPACING REMARKS
GROUND COVERSConvolvulus mauritanicus / Morning Glory flats 24" o.c. LowLantana montevidensis / Trailing Lantana flats 24" o.c. LowMyoporum parvifolium / Trailing Myoporum flats 24" o.c. LowRuschia lineolata 'Nana' / Dwarf Carpet of Stars 4" pot 8" o.c. Low Satureja douglasii / Yerba Buena 4" pot 18" o.c. LowSenecio serpens / Blue Chalksticks 4" pot 18" o.c. Low Verbena peruviana 'Red' / Peruvian Verbena 4" pot 18" o.c. Low

NON-PLANT MATERIAL
Decomposed Granite / with stabilizer 3" Thick Layer Tan/brown

PLANT SCHEDULE
SOD
Agrostis pallens / Native Bentgrass Sod Low




 
DesignWorks
Design Works
Landscape Architecture
L.A. Group Design Works, Inc.
0 SCALE:
feet 16 32 48
1/16" = 1'-0"
NORTH
Date: 09.30.2024JOB # 4856
San Dimas, California
Rev: 01.28.2025

LANTANA
TTM: 84582: 901 W. COVINA BLVD.

Plant Images
TREES
Acacia salicinaWillow acacia
SHRUBS
Anigozanthos 'Big Red'
Muhlenbergia capillaris
'Pink Muhly'

GROUND COVERS
Nassella tenuissimaMexican Feather Grass
Lantana montevidensis
'Lavender'
Festuca glauca
'Elijah Blue'
Myoporum parvifolium Senecio serpens
Arbutus 'Marina'
Strawberry Tree
Cercis occidentalis
Western Redbud
Lagunaria p.Primrose Tree
Prunus carolinianaLaurel Cherry
Robinia x ambigua
'Purple Robe'
Tristania laurina
'Elegant'
Verbena peruviana 'Red'
Anigozanthosx 'Kanga Pink' Carex divulsa
European Grey Sedge
Chondropetalum tectorumCape Rush
Cistus ladaniferCrimson Spot Rockrose
Correa x'Ray's Tangerine'
Dianella revoluta
'Clarity Blue'
Dianella revoluta
'Baby Bliss'
Dietes vegetaFortnight Lily
Lantana camara
'Teenie Genie'
Lantana camara
'Fiesta™ Piña Lantana'
Laurus nobilis 'Monrik'Dwarf Sweet Bay
Lavandula angustifolia
'Thumbelina Leigh'
Olea e. 'Montra'
Little Ollie® Dwarf Olive
Penstemon heterophyllus
'Margarita BOP'
Salvia greggii'Heatwave Blaze'
VINES
Macfadayena unguis-cati
Yellow Trumpet Vine
Ficus pumila
Creeping fig
Aloe striata
Coral Aloe
Myoporum parvifolium
Westringia f. 'Blue Gem'
Coast Rosemary
Yucca filamentosa
'Color Guard'
Ruschia lineolata 'Nana'Dwarf Carpet of Stars
SOD
Agrostis pallens
Native Bent Grass

EXISTING RAILROAD
12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21
U20 U19
U18
U17 U16
U15
U5
U6
U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U4 U3
U2
U1
1 6 13 14
15 PLAN 3
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.5 P=834.9
P=835.5
P=835.1 P=838.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8
P=846.3 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5
P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=833.9 P=839.2 P=852.0 P=853.5
P=854.5
OVINA BLVD.C
"A" DRIVE (PRIVATE COMMON DRIVEWAY & FIRE LANE)

CODE DESCRIPTION
Existing Wall: per civil plans
Sound Wall: Height varies, see civil plansOrco, Precision Block & Cap / Color: Tan MW Retaining Wall: Height varies, see civil plans
Orco, Precision Block & Cap / Color: Tan MW6' H. Privacy Block Wall:Orco, Split Face Block wPrecision Cap / Color: Tan MWCombo Wall - Perimeter: 6' H. Tube Steel atop retaining wall per civil plans
Wall & Cap: Orco, Precision Block / Color: Tan MW
Fence: Fenceworks, Calif. Tube Steel / Color: Black
Combo Wall - Interior: 6' H. Vinyl Fence atop
retaining wall per civil plans
Wall & Cap: Orco, Precision Block / Color: Tan MW
Fence: Fenceworks, Inc., Vinyl Privacy Fence / Color: Tan 6' H. Vinyl Privacy Fence: Fenceworks, Inc.Color: Tan6' H. Vinyl Gate: Fenceworks Inc. PVC Pedestrian GateColor: Tan W-101W-102W-103W-104W-105W-106W-107W-108

WALLS & FENCES SCHEDULE




 
DesignWorks
Design Works
Landscape Architecture
L.A. Group Design Works, Inc.
0 SCALE:
feet 16 32 48
1/16" = 1'-0"
NORTH
Date: 04.09.2025JOB # 4856

LANTANA
TTM: 84582: 901 W. COVINA BLVD.

Conceptual Fence & Wall Plan
San Dimas, California






  



    





"0'2

 


5327
0*9'7.326"0'2

 


0335
"0'2"0'2

 


$4'2.6-
0*9'7.326"0'2

 


"5'.5.*
0*9'7.326"0'2

 


'51-386*
0*9'7.326"0'2

 


#33+
"0'26"0'2






5327
0*9'7.326"0'2






0335
"0'2"0'2






$4'2.6-
0*9'7.326"0'2






"5'.5.*
0*9'7.326"0'2






'51-386*
0*9'7.326"0'2






#33+
"0'26"0'2





5327
0*9'7.326"0'2





0335
"0'2"0'2





$4'2.6-
0*9'7.326"0'2





"5'.5.*
0*9'7.326"0'2





'51-386*
0*9'7.326"0'2





#33+
"0'26"0'2





07*52'7*
'5',*
0*9'7.326&5.77*2
3035
$(-*1*63035
3'5)6

<<
$4'2.6-
3035
3'5)6

<<
"5'.5.*3035
3'5)6

<<
'51-386* $

$



!#

#
31*6

2(




'5(-1327
09)
$7*


36
2,*0*6



327'(7%.137-;
$'0*6.2+35(-31*6.2((31:::5(-31*6.2((31 327'(7
.6(-'
8763286.2*66



:::/0('5(-(31
5(-.7*(7

*9.2


533/
5(-.7*(7

2(

#*;230)6
9*
$8.7*


59.2*











#$#.
0,
)+"/!-#
".3'+%/
$,.
3))
0.##
+"
/&.1
),!0',+/ 


#2'+

.,,(
.!&'0#!0
+!  







 




  ()!.!&!,*






 




 






#$#.
0,
)+"/!-#
".3'+%/
$,.
3))
0.##
+"
/&.1
),!0',+/ 


#2'+

.,,(
.!&'0#!0
+!  #$#.
0,
)+"/!-#
".3'+%/
$,.
3))
0.##
+"
/&.1
),!0',+/ 


#2'+

.,,(
.!&'0#!0
+! 



 









!


"
$%
$
 $ 
#!
% $ 
#!

 
 0
"


   0
"


  
 0

$


!$
%!!"
&




%


!$
$

 

 0
!"

"

!"

$
$

!$
 #$







  





0 

"
!&"

   0


'
"

 

 0

$"'

 0
"


 
 0
!$

$




 0
! "








  





 







  

  0
"

 







  +,)(/)*).-






 
# 

" "#$

"


!$ 

"



 











 











 











 















  






 




 











"#"-
/+
(
*!.
,"
!-
2&*$.
#+-
2
((
/-""

*!
.%-0
(+
/&+*. 


"1&*

-++'

- %&/" /
*  
















  '(
- % +)






 




 






"#"-
/+
(
*!.
,"
!-
2&*$.
#+-
2
((
/-""

*!
.%-0
(+
/&+*. 


"1&*

-++'

- %&/" /
*   "#"-
/+
(
*!.
,"
!-
2&*$.
#+-
2
((
/-""

*!
.%-0
(+
/&+*. 


"1&*

-++'

- %&/" /
*  



 









!


"
$%
$
 $ 
#!
% $ 
#!


!$
%!!"

   0
"


  0
"


&




!"

$


 
 0
!"

"



$

%
  
 0

$
!$
#$

 
 




 





 





 







0 

"

  0
"
!$"'
 

 0



 
  0


'
"


$


$"'




 0
! "


 










 





 




  0
"

 







  +,)(/)*).-






 
# 

" "#$

"


!$ 

"



 











 











 











 















  






 




 












 



#$#.
0,
)+"/!-#
".3'+%/
$,.
3))
0.##
+"
/&.1
),!0',+/ 


#2'+

.,,(
.!&'0#!0
+!  







 




  ()!.!&!,*






 




 






#$#.
0,
)+"/!-#
".3'+%/
$,.
3))
0.##
+"
/&.1
),!0',+/ 


#2'+

.,,(
.!&'0#!0
+!  #$#.
0,
)+"/!-#
".3'+%/
$,.
3))
0.##
+"
/&.1
),!0',+/ 


#2'+

.,,(
.!&'0#!0
+!      
 
   
 
     
  
  
         
   
 
      
 
 
 
        
     
  
      
 
    
  
 
 
  
     
    
  




 









#!


$
&'&
"!
"!
&
"!
%#
'!"!
&
"!
%#

%(%





 3
$ 

 


 3
$ 

)





#$

&



3
#$

$ 

&

'





 3
"&

!!
"#&
'##$


"#&
 %&


 





 
 

 

 
 

 

 3
 
$
#!&$*



 3
$


  3
$ 

"&%

&!



 3

!
!


 3

*
$ 
!&$*

&

"#&
&


 





 




 

 

 

 3
 
$



 3
$





 3
$


"






  ./,+2,-,10






 

$%&
""$


%"!
""$
&$!&
$
!&$*
"#&
"!
$""




 











 











 











 















  






 




 











 















!"













































 









 








 




















































 







" "




























































 












 














 

























 



 





 





 




12/17/2024
A-20































































 


































































































 





 































 










 

































! "








" "






 





 




12/17/2024
A-21




















































































































































 



"



 



"


























 


















































































!
"









" "
















 



 





 





 




12/17/2024
A-22





 






 









!




$& 



%
%

%

%&'!




%&'!
" &
& %)

$&  %)


$%&

)& %)

$

(


%

&$ %)

(
%) 


%)


%

$
!!$ %)





$!' 
%) 





&
%&
%)



&

'&
$! &
!!$













%'&&$%
%)







$'%&
$
%)






%&
$!
%)


"! &
(+


 
&
%)



& $

%)



& $

%)



& $

$!!

!)
"$!

%
(


(% 







%
$ 


(%



$
%&

(%




%
%

%

%

%&'!






%&'!
" &
& %)


  %) 

" &
$ %)


 

%

&$ %)

$

(


%)








$$&
$+
%)








(
+

$!) %&'! !

"
% 







!$ $
!$%

$
!!$
%)

$
$
%)








($%&

$+

%)








%%


" & %$)
)

%
$! &
!!$ %)










%%

!

%)








"!

"
'
%)




 
)  ( $ 
!$!
$!!

&
%
& +








!

%"$


+








%!
+
&!",


%






$$+)!! $!! !$

$

%&

! 
 %&

&!
&' $











'%&
&' $

&!
&' $









$&!$ $!'& !$!
-.
#'

%
 %
 %

%&'!





%&'!
" &
& $





%)

&! +
&'" %)

' ($%




%

&$


$
!!$
%)



$!
!$
%)








 $

)&
%) 







( 
)&
!$

&&
%  %)






*&$
)&
%)

!%&
$!)
%) 



!!!
$! &
!!$
%'&&$%
%)



$!
!$
%)







$

&
%)








!*
$!!

&
%
 









$!


 










%!
+
&!",













$'%&
$)


%&! 
$!'
'&

!$
(

+
$!'
'&



'&'


$!''&





( +$
&$


























 











 














 








































"$$

(&! %$!'%



















 

















%
%


%
%



(&! %%" %

(&! %














 








SAN DIMAS 37 SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056

SPANISH
SCHEME #1

ONCRETE ROOF C

YDO B CCO TU S

R OO E D G ARA G

TRIM / ASCIA F
/ FRONT DOOR

S SHUTTER

GABLE END DETAIL
SAN DIMAS 37
SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056

SPANISH
SCHEME #2

ONCRETE ROOF C

Y TUCCO BOD S

R OO E D G ARA G

TRIM / ASCIA F
/ FRONT DOOR

S SHUTTER

GABLE END DETAIL
SAN DIMAS 37
SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056

SPANISH
SCHEME #3

ONCRETE ROOF C

Y TUCCO BOD S

R OO E D G ARA G

TRIM / ASCIA F
/ FRONT DOOR

S SHUTTER

ABLE END DETAIL G















 








SAN DIMAS 37 SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056
P
R
AIRI
E
SCHEME #
4 ONCRETE ROOF C

YDO B CCO TU S
/ AP SIDING L

R OO E D G ARA G

TRIM / ASCIA F

R OO NT D ORF BRICK
SAN DIMAS 37
SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056
P
R
AIRI
E
SCHEME #5

ONCRETE ROOF C

Y TUCCO BOD S
/ AP SIDING L

GARAGE DOOR

TRIM / ASCIA F

RONT DOOR F BRICK
SAN DIMAS 37
SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056
P
R
AIRI
E
SCHEME #6

ONCRETE ROOF C

Y TUCCO BOD S
/ AP SIDING L

GARAGE DOOR

TRIM / ASCIA F

RONT DOOR F BRICK














 








SAN DIMAS 37 SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056
FARMH
OUSE
SCHEME #7

ONCRETE ROOF C

YDO B CCO TU S

BATTEN & OARD B

IDING S
/ TRIM / FASCIA

R OO E D G ARA G
/ FRONT DOOR

S SHUTTER
STONE
SAN DIMAS 37
SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056
FARMH
OUS
E
SCHEME #8

ONCRETE ROOF C

Y TUCCO BOD S

OARD & BATTEN B

IDING S
/ TRIM / FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR
/ FRONT DOOR

S SHUTTER
STONE
SAN DIMAS 37
SAN DIMAS, CA JULY 24, 2024
#24056
FARMH
OUS
E
SCHEME #9

ONCRETE ROOF C

Y TUCCO BOD S

OARD & BATTEN B

IDING S
/ TRIM / FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR
/ FRONT DOOR

S SHUTTER
STONE

Barn
Storage
Residence
Residence

SUBJECT

PROPERTY
901 W. Covina Blvd
Oblique Aerial -- OA 2
Ground Photo -- GP1
ique Aerial -- OA 4
ound Photo -- GP3 Oblique Aerial -- OA 3
Ground Photo -- GP2
Oblique Aerial -- OA 1
Ground Photo -- n/a
Oblique Aerial -- OA 3 GP4 Ground Photo -- GP2
GP5
GP6

SITE PHOTO KEY
GP7
EIF--Item #2
ATTACHMENT 4
Oblique Aerial Views of Subject Property
OA-1: Oblique Aerial as viewed from North:

OA-2: Oblique Aerial as viewed from South:

EIF Item #2 Page 139 – 427
Oblique Aerial Views of Subject Property
OA-3: Oblique Aerial as viewed from East:

OA-4: Oblique Aerial as viewed from West:

EIF Item #2 Page 140 – 427
Ground Photos Views of Subject Property
NOTE: A ground photo from the North is not possible due to active railroad ROW.

GP1: Ground Photo as viewed from South:

GP2: Ground Photo as viewed from East:

GP3: Ground Photo as viewed from West:

EIF Item #2 Page 141 – 427
Ground Photos Views of Subject Property
GP4: Ground Photo of on-site feature – Residence & Storage Bldg GP5: Ground Photo of on-site feature – Residence
EIF Item #2 Page 142 – 427
Ground Photos Views of Subject Property
GP6: Ground Photo of on-site feature – Barn
GP7: Ground Photo of Site Entry Looking Outwards to the South EIF Item #2 Page 143 – 427
901 W COVINA BLVD

PROJECT
Exemption Checklist
May 2025
Lead Agency:

City of San Dimas
245 E Bonita Ave
San Dimas, CA 91773
Project Applicant:

RC Homes, Inc.
550 N. Larchmont Blvd., Ste. 201
Los Angeles, CA 90004
CEQA Consultant:
3333 Michelson Drive, Suite 500
Irvine, California 92612
ATTACHMENT 5

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas
This page intentionally left blank.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas i
Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................1

1.1. PURPOSE OF NOTICE OF EXEMPTION......................................................................................................1

1.2. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION.....................................................................................................................1

2. PROJECT SETTING..........................................................................................................................2

2.1. PROJECT LOCATION.....................................................................................................................................2

2.2. EXISTING PROJECT SITE................................................................................................................................2

2.3. EXISTING LAND USES AND REGULATORY SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE.....................................2

2.4. SURROUNDING LAND USES........................................................................................................................2

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................................19

3.1. PROJECT OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................................. 19

3.2. PROJECT FEATURES .................................................................................................................................... 19

3.3. DENSITY BONUS LAW............................................................................................................................... 21

3.4. CONSTRUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 22

3.5. DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS AND PERMITS........................................................................................ 22

4. CLASS 32 INFILL EXEMPTION REQUIREMENTS............................................................................41

4.1. PROPOSED PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION.............................................................................................. 41

4.2. EXCEPTIONS FOR EXEMPTIONS .............................................................................................................. 62

5. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................65 Tables
TABLE 2-1: SURROUNDING LAND USE ...................................................................................................................................2 TABLE 3-1: RESIDENTIAL UNIT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 19 TABLE 4-1: SF-8000 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ............................................................................................................. 42 TABLE 4-2: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION.............................................................................................................................. 46 TABLE 4-3: CITY OF SAN DIMAS NOISE LEVEL LIMITS ......................................................................................................... 48 TABLE 4-4: CITY OF SAN DIMAS NOISE LEVEL LIMITS ......................................................................................................... 49 TABLE 4-5: CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS....................................................................................................... 50 TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT NEARBY SENSITIVE RECEPTORS .................................................................. 52 TABLE 4-7: FTA PROJECT EFFECTS ON CUMULATIVE NOISE EXPOSURE ............................................................................. 53 TABLE 4-8: EXISTING YEAR PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE CONTRIBUTIONS .............................................................................. 53 TABLE 4-9: OPENING YEAR 2027 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE CONTRIBUTIONS.................................................................. 54 TABLE 4-10: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS ......................................................................................................................... 54 TABLE 4-11: VIBRATION SOURCE AMPLITUDES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT............................................................. 55 TABLE 4-12: REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS......................................................................................................... 57 TABLE 4-13: REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS............................................................................................................ 58 TABLE 4-14: LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES ........................................................................................ 58 TABLE 4-15: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION GHG EMISSIONS................................................................................................. 59 TABLE 4-16: PROJECT TOTAL GHG EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................ 60

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas ii
Figures
FIGURE 2-1: REGIONAL LOCATION........................................................................................................................................3 FIGURE 2-2: LOCAL VICINITY.................................................................................................................................................5 FIGURE 2-3: AERIAL VIEW......................................................................................................................................................7 FIGURE 2-4: EXISTING SITE PHOTO A ...................................................................................................................................9 FIGURE 2-5: EXISTING SITE PHOTO B................................................................................................................................. 11 FIGURE 2-6: EXISTING SITE PHOTO C ................................................................................................................................ 13 FIGURE 2-7: EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION........................................................................................................ 15 FIGURE 2-8: EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION.................................................................................................................. 16 FIGURE 3-1: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN................................................................................................................................. 23 FIGURE 3-2: ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS A............................................................................................................................. 25 FIGURE 3-3: ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS B.............................................................................................................................. 27 FIGURE 3-4: ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS C............................................................................................................................. 29 FIGURE 3-5: ELEVATIONS A................................................................................................................................................ 31 FIGURE 3-6: ELEVATIONS B................................................................................................................................................. 33 FIGURE 3-7: ELEVATIONS C................................................................................................................................................ 35 FIGURE 3-8: CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN..................................................................................................................... 37 FIGURE 3-9: GUEST PARKING DISPLAY PLAN..................................................................................................................... 39 Appendices
A. ARBORIST REPORT
B. AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT ANALYSIS
C. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
D. HISTORIC RESOURCE ANALYSIS REPORT
E. NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS
F. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
G. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
H. VMT SCREENING
I. HYDROLOGY, HYDRAULIC AND LID STUDY

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 1

1. INTRODUCTION
The Applicant for the 901 W Covina Blvd Project (proposed Project) is requesting approval from the City of San Dimas to develop a 3.27-acre site with 37 detached residential dwelling units. The City of San Dimas is the Lead Agency for the proposed Project. The Lead Agency will utilize this document as evidence that the proposed Project qualifies for the Class 32 Infill Development Projects Exemption, which is further described below.

1.1. PURPOSE OF NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
Article 19 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines includes, as required by Public Resources Code Section 21084, a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment. This document demonstrates that the proposed Project qualifies for a CEQA Exemption as an Infill Development Project (Class 32 Exemption), consistent with the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15332 and 15300.2 and provides information for City decision-makers to find that the proposed Project is exempt under CEQA.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, the proposed Project qualifies for a Class 32 Exemption because it is: (1) consistent with the General Plan designation and policies and zoning regulations; (2) is located within the City limits, surrounded by urban uses and is less than 5 acres in size; (3) has no value for endangered, rare or threatened species; (4) would not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality; and (5) can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Additionally, this document demonstrates that the proposed Project and its circumstances would not result in any exceptions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
Throughout the analysis of this document, reference is made to requirements that are applied to all development on the basis of federal, state, or local law. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies are collectively identified in this document as PPPs. Where applicable, PPPs are listed to show their effect in reducing potential environmental impacts.

1.2. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
This Class 32 Exemption Checklist includes the following sections:

Section 1. Introduction. Provides information about CEQA, its requirements for environmental review, and explains the Exemption Checklist that evaluates the potential impacts of the proposed Project to the physical environment.

Section 2. Project Setting. Provides information about the proposed Project’s location, the Project site, and background.

Section 3. Project Description. Includes a description of the proposed Project’s physical features and construction and operational characteristics, as well as anticipated approvals and permits needed for implementation of the proposed Project.

Section 4. Class 32 Infill Exemption Requirements. Includes the Exemption Checklist and evaluates the proposed Project’s potential to result in significant adverse effects to the physical environment.

Section 5. References. Includes a list of sources used to support the information in this document.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 2

2. PROJECT SETTING

2.1. PROJECT LOCATION
The Project site is located in the northwestern portion of the City of San Dimas within Los Angeles County.

The Project site is located within Section 00, Township 1 South, Range 9, West San Bernardino Principal Meridian. Regional access to the Project site is provided via State Route 57 (SR-57). The regional location of the Project site is shown in Figure 2-1, Regional Location.

The Project site is comprised of one parcel identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 8385-006-027.

The Project site is bounded by a church and parking lot to the west, residential mobile home estates to the east, West Covina Boulevard to the south and the Southern Pacific Railroad to the north. Local access to the Project site is currently provided via two driveways from West Covina Boulevard. The Project vicinity and surrounding area is shown in Figure 2-2, Local Vicinity.

2.2. EXISTING PROJECT SITE
The Project site is partially developed with two residences, a barn, and a garage building. The portion of the site that is undeveloped contains vegetation limited to grasses, shrubs, and ornamental trees. There is an existing chain link fence along the western and southern boundary of the site and an existing block wall along the eastern boundary. Existing conditions of the Project site and adjacent uses are shown in Figure 2- 3, Aerial View, and Figures 2-4 through 2-6, Site Photos.

2.3. EXISTING LAND USES AND REGULATORY SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE The Project site is designated as Single Family Low Residential (SF-Low) by the City of San Dimas General Plan and the City of San Dimas Zoning Map identifies the zoning designation as Single Family (SF-8000), as shown on Figure 2-7, Existing General Plan Designation, and Figure 2-8, Existing Zoning Designation. The SFLow land use designation is intended for single family detached dwellings and has a density allowance of

3.1 to 6 density units per acre (du/acre). The SF zone is intended to provide for the development of singlefamily residential homes at urban standards, with not more than one dwelling unit permitted on any lot or parcel.

2.4. SURROUNDING LAND USES
The Project site is located within an area that is either developed or being planned for development. Table 2-1 below describes the existing surrounding uses, land uses and zoning designations.

Table 2-1: Surrounding Land Use
Direction Existing Use General Plan Land Use Zoning
North
Southern Pacific Railroad
followed by warehouse
building
Industrial Light Manufacturing (M-1)
East Residential mobile home estates Mobile Home Residential Mobile Home Park (MH-P) South
West Covina Boulevard
followed by San Dimas High
School
Public/Semi-Public Public/Semi-Public (PS)
West Church, office, and parking lot Medium Residential Single Family (SF-7500)

Regional Location
Walnut
Covina
West Covina
Pomona
La Verne
Glendora
Unincorporated
San Dimas
±
0 ½ 1
Miles

PROJECT SITE
Path: C:\Users\TiffanyDang\EPD Solutions\GIS - Documents\Projects\24-067_CovinaBlvd\CEQA\PDGraphics\PDGraphics.aprx Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS 210
10 SR-57
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
City of San Dimas
Figure 2-1

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 4
This page was intentionally left blank.

Local Vicinity
±
0 1000 2000
Feet
Path: C:\Users\TiffanyDang\EPD Solutions\GIS - Documents\Projects\24-067_CovinaBlvd\CEQA\PDGraphics\PDGraphics.aprx *Section Township Range
Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P,

NGA, USGS
Legend
Project Site
210
SR-57
901 W Covina Boulevard
Project City of San Dimas
Figure 2-2

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 6
This page was intentionally left blank.

Aerial View
±
0 80 160
Feet
Maxar, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, iPC
Path: C:\Users\TiffanyDang\EPD Solutions\GIS - Documents\Projects\24-067_CovinaBlvd\CEQA\PDGraphics\PDGraphics.aprx Legend
Project Site
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
City of San Dimas
Figure 2-3

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 8
This page was intentionally left blank.

Existing Site Photos A
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDE

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 2-4 City of San Dimas View of the existing single family residential home on the Project Site.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 10
This page intentionally left blank.

Existing Site Photo B
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDE

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 2-5
City of San Dimas View of the remnant plant nursery structures on the Project Site.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 12
This page intentionally left blank.

Existing Site Photo C
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDE

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 2-6
City of San Dimas View of the existing Project accessway from Covina Boulevard.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 14
This page intentionally left blank.

Existing General Plan Designation

HOSPITAL

COAST PLAZA
PARK

NEW RIVER
PARK

LAKESIDE

LORETTA
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

CORVALLIS
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCHOOL
D.D. JOHNSTON

INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

LAKESIDE
SCHOOL

STUDEBAKER

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL

LAMPTON
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 6
1 ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
Arrow Hwy.

Cienega Ave.

Covina Blvd.

Valley Cen
NP

RESIDENTIAL
HIGH

LOW / MEDIUM
MEDIUM

MOBILE HOME

SINGLE FAMILY
LOW

SINGLE FAMILY

VERY LOW

SINGLE FAMILY

VERY LOW
ESTATE

DENSITY
(0.2 - 3)
(0 - 0.2) @
A. 5 AC MIN
B. 10 AC MIN
C. 15 AC MIN
(3.1 - 6)
(6.1 - 8)
(8.1 - 12)
(12.1 - 16)

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL
PARK

RP-REGIONAL

NP-NEIGHBORHOOD

CP-COMMUNITY

OPEN SPACE

PUBLIC / SEMI-PUBLIC

S INDUSTRIAL

PROJECT SITE
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 2-7
City of San Dimas

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 16
This page intentionally left blank.

Existing Zoning Designation
Fidel
Painter
Maryton
§¨¦5
5 !!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
Pine
Lesser
Cyclops
ne
Crewe
Walnut
Belshire
Balsam
S
Kalnor
5th
Hopland Orange
Allard
Bombardier
Grayland
Elaine
Ibex Funston
Adoree
Paddison
Arlee
Zeus
Olive
Union
Sycamore
6th
rs
kdale
Abingdon
Alondra
Oland
Tina
Lindale
Aegean
Erwood
160th
Highdale
Algardi
161st
Busiris
Juno
7th
Hebe
Devlin
162
d
Cheshire
Lowemont
Hayford
Barnwall
Nava
Molette
Ruchel
Gem
Adon
Clarett
BLVD

SAN ANTONIO DR
7 SPA 12
SPA 3
S
6 5
®
oning Map
Z
Arrow Hwy
Cienega Ave
Covina Blvd
CG-1
CG-1
CG-1
CG-4
CH
S
SP-18
SP-2 SP-2
CH
SP-20
SP-18
SF-7500
SF-A7500
MH-P
SP-2
SF-7500
SF-7500
SF-7500
SF-7500
SF-7500
AP
AP
SP-21
M-1
SF-8000 MH-P SF-7500
(RPD 9.5)
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
MH-P
SF-8000
SP-16
SF-7500
SP-13
MH-P
MH-P
SF-7500
(RPD-11.5)
Valley Cente
San

ZONING MAP

SINGLE FAMILY DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL (SF-DR)

SINGLE FAMILY (SF)

SINGLE FAMILY HILLSIDE (SF-H)

SINGLE FAMILY AGRICULTURE (SF-A)

MOBILE HOME PARK (MH-P)

MULTIPLE FAMILY (MF)

MULTIPLE FAMILY DUPLEX (MF-D)

COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (CN)

COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY (CH)

ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL (AP)

CREATIVE GROWTH (CG)
LIGHT MANUFACTURING (M-1)

LIGHT AGRICULTURE (AL)

PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC (PS)

OPEN SPACE (OS)

WATERSHED (W)

SPECIFIC PLAN (SP)

PROJECT SITE
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
City of San Dimas Figure 2-8

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 18
This page intentionally left blank.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 19

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

3.1. PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Project applicant proposes to demolish the existing four buildings on the Project site, subdivide the approximately 3.27-gross acre parcel, and develop the site with 37 detached residential dwelling units.

Additionally, the proposed Project would include landscaping, parking, private roadways, common and private open space, and utility and stormwater improvements. A sound wall would also be constructed along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to the existing railroad as part of the Project. The Project would also construct a median on West Covina Boulevard to prohibit vehicles exiting the Project from turning left on West Covina Boulevard. Figure 3-1, Conceptual Site Plan, illustrates the Project as proposed. The Project requires approval of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM), Tree Removal Permit, and Development Plan Review (DPRB) from the City of San Dimas.

3.2. PROJECT FEATURES
Development Summary
The proposed Project would demolish the four existing buildings on site and would construct 37 detached residential dwelling units on the 3.27 acre site, which would result in a density of 11.31 du/acre. The proposed Project would include 37 single-family residences, consisting of 30 market rate units, 5 low-income affordable units, and 2 moderate income units which qualifies the Project for a density bonus under the State Density Bonus Law (CA Gov Code Section 65915). The units would be comprised of three different floor plans that are grouped into six building types. The residences would have 3 or 4 bedrooms (with a loft as an optional bedroom) and 2.5 to 3 bathrooms and would range in size from 1,812 to 2,197 square feet (SF). Table 3-1 provides a summary of the proposed floor plans.

Table 3-1: Residential Unit Summary
Unit Type No. of Units Bedrooms Bathrooms
Building
Coverage
Square Footage
Plan Square
Footage
1 15 31 2.5 1,209 1,812
2 13 31 2.5 1,260 2,002
3 9 41 3 1,393 2,197
1 Includes a loft as an optional bedroom
The proposed residences would be two stories with a maximum height of 28 feet, measured from finish grade to top of highest roof ridges. Project elevations would include a variety of architectural elements, including articulated massing and finish material palates, and have design characteristics consistent with Spanish, prairie, and farmhouse styles. Details and features of the proposed detached residential dwelling units are provided in Figures 3-2 through 3-4, Architectural Details A-C and conceptual renderings are provided in Figures 3-5 through 3-7, Elevations A-C.

Landscaping and Recreation
The Project would install new drought tolerant landscaping that requires low water and maintenance as required by the City’s municipal code. This would include eighty-two (82) 15-gallon trees, including Willow Acacia, Marina Strawberry, and Primrose. Trees would be installed throughout the site and adjacent to retaining walls along sidewalk areas. In addition, Primrose Trees would be planted along the block wall separating the southeasternmost unit and the proposed infiltration system situated at the southeast corner of the Project site. The irrigation system will be designed for water conservation and in compliance with

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 20
applicable municipal codes and State mandate regulations (AB 1881). Figure 3-8, Conceptual Landscape Plan, illustrates the site’s landscape plan as proposed.

The Project would provide an average of approximately 1,656 SF of private open space per unit.

Additionally, the Project would include approximately 36,871 SF of common open space.

The Project would also include sidewalks throughout the site that would provide pedestrian circulation around the site and to adjacent offsite areas.

Lighting
Proposed outdoor lighting would be typical of single-family residential uses and would consist of wallmounted lighting, pole-mounted lights along the proposed internal roadway. All of the proposed Project’s outdoor lighting would be directed downward and shielded to minimize offsite and would be designed in compliance with the provisions San Dimas Municipal Code Section 18.528.120, Lighting.

Access and Circulation
The Project would close off the two existing driveways and one new 34-foot-wide driveway would be constructed on West Covina Boulevard, which would provide access to the site and the proposed residences.

The Project would include a total of 137 parking spaces as shown in Figure 3-9, Guest Parking Display Plan.

All residences would include two enclosed garage spaces for a total of 74 garage stalls. Additionally, 22 units would have full driveways resulting in 44 driveway spaces. The Project would also provide 7 motor court (head-in) spaces and 12 parallel street spaces throughout the site.

Fences and Walls
The Project proposes the installation of a retaining wall with iron fence atop along the western boundary of the Project site ranging from 5 to 6 feet high and the installation of a retaining wall along the eastern boundary of the site ranging from 3.5 to 5.5 feet high. The proposed wall would be parallel to the existing walls on the adjacent east and west properties. A combination of retaining walls and vinyl fencing would also be installed around the interior side yards and backyards of each residence. Additionally, a sound wall at least 6-feet tall would be constructed along the northern boundary of the site, south of the existing Southern Pacific railroad to shield proposed residences from existing railroad noise.

Infrastructure Improvements
There are two existing easements for public utilities and incidental purposes that transect the site from west to east. In addition, there is one existing easement for telecommunications in the northeast portion of the site adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Gas and Electric
The Project would be serviced by Southern California Edison (SCE) for electricity. The Project would install underground electric lines throughout the site that would connect to existing SCE infrastructure in the adjacent roadway. There are three existing power poles located along the eastern boundary of the site—all of which would be removed and undergrounded. The Project would be all electric, therefore no gas service provider would be necessary.

Water and Sewer
The Project would be serviced by Golden State Water Company for water services and by San Dimas Public Works for sewer services. The Project would install new onsite water lines which would connect to the existing

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 21
18-inch water line in West Covina Boulevard. The Project would also install new onsite sewer lines which would connect to the existing 8-inch sewer line in West Covina Boulevard.

Stormwater Drainage
The proposed Project would install a detention basin in the southeast portion of the site. Stormwater captured in the detention basin would exit the site through a proposed parkway drain to then flow westerly along West Covina Boulevard.

Roadway
A new median will be constructed on West Covina Boulevard to prohibit vehicles exiting the Project from turning left on West Covina Boulevard. Therefore, access to the Project will be provided only through a Right-In, Right-Out configuration at the proposed Project driveway.

3.3. DENSITY BONUS LAW
The Density Bonus Law (DBL) (CA Gov Code Section 65915) encourages the development of affordable housing by allowing additional density on a property above the maximum density in a jurisdiction’s General Plan. The Project must reserve an allotted number of affordable dwelling units below market rate in exchange for the density increase. Reductions in required development standards such as setbacks may also be granted to qualifying applicants. Additional provisions under the DBL include incentives or concessions providing cost reductions; waivers of development standards that would physically preclude the construction of a development with incentives granted; and reductions of parking requirements. Incentives are limited in number and granted on a sliding scale based on the percentage of affordable housing that is provided.

Waivers are potentially unlimited in number. Pursuant to CA Gov Code Section 65915(d), incentives or concessions shall be granted unless (a) “the concession or incentive does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions… to provide for affordable housing costs… or for rents for the targeted units to be set”; (b) “the concession or incentive would have a specific, adverse impact…upon public health and safety or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to low-income and moderate-income households”; (c) or “the concession or incentive would be contrary to state or federal law.” Waiver requests must be similarly granted when a development standard would physically preclude construction of a DBL-qualified project, unless the waiver would have a specific adverse impact that cannot be mitigated or avoided, would have an adverse impact on a property listed in the California Register of Historical Resources, or would be contrary to State or federal law.

The DBL specifies that “the granting of a density bonus shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan amendment, zoning change, or other discretionary approval.” Similarly, pursuant to Gov Code section 65589.5 (the “Housing Accountability Act”), the receipt of a density bonus, incentive, concession, waiver, or reduction of development standards pursuant to the DBL is not a valid basis on which to conclude that a proposed housing development project is inconsistent, not in compliance, or not in conformity with otherwise applicable local land use plan, policies, programs, or standards.

The Project site is designated as SF-Low by the City of San Dimas General Plan and zoned as SF-8000. As mentioned previously, the proposed Project would result in approximately 11.31 du/acre which is above the allowed maximum density for the site of 6 du/acre. However, the Applicant has requested a density bonus consistent with State law for affordable housing to allow for the development of additional units.

Pursuant to the DBL, the Project would be allowed to exceed the maximum site density of 6 du/acre. State law allows the City to approve an increase in density for affordable housing projects without requiring approval of a general plan amendment or zone change.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 22

3.4. CONSTRUCTION
Construction activities for the Project would occur over one phase lasting approximately 19 months, beginning the second quarter of 2026 and ending the fourth quarter of 2027. Construction would occur in the following stages: (1) site preparation and grading; (2) building construction; (3) paving; and (4) architectural coatings.

Construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays and prohibited on Sundays and public holidays pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code Chapter

8.36.100.

The proposed Project would result in a cut of 35,890 cubic yards (CY) of soil and a fill of 38,129 CY of soil totaling a net import of approximately 2,239 CY of soil.

3.5. DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS AND PERMITS
The following discretionary approvals from the City, as Lead Agency, are anticipated to be necessary for implementation of the proposed Project:
• Approval of Tentative Tract Map (TTM)
• Approval of Development Plan Review (DPRB)
• Approval of Density Bonus Request
• Approval of Tree Removal Permit
• Approval of Demolition of Historic Structure

Conceptual Site Plan
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDEB

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-1 City of San Dimas
12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21 U19 U20 U18
U16 U17
U15
U5
U6 U7 U8 U9
U10 U11
U12 U13 U14 U3 U4 U2
U1
14 13 6 1
15 PLAN 3 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5 P=834.9 P=834.5 P=835.5
P=838.1 P=835.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8 P=846.3 P=845.9 P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5 P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9 P=851.4 P=850.8
P=853.5 P=852.0 P=839.2 P=833.9 P=854.5
LOT 16
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
15 F
F
B
B C
C
E E G
G
D D
A
A

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 24
This page was intentionally left blank.

Conceptual Architectural Details - Building A
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDEB

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-2 City of San Dimas

DECORATIVE LIGHT

FIXTURE

BACKLIT ADDRESS

PANEL PATTERN

GARAGE DOOR PER

ELEVATION STYLE

PANEL PATTERN

GARAGE DOOR PER

ELEVATION STYLE

FULL-ARCHED SOFFIT

AT PORCH

FULL-ARCHED SOFFIT

AT PORCH

FULL-ARCHED SOFFIT

AT PORCH

ARCHED SOFFIT

ARCHED SOFFIT

ARCHED SOFFIT

CANTILEVER PROJECTION

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR
+0” -24” STUCCO OVER FOAM

STUCCO OVER FOAM

DECORATIVE SHUTTER

DECORATIVE SHUTTER

STUCCO WALLS

HIP ROOF HIP ROOF

VERTICALLY PROPORTIONED

WINDOWS

VERTICALLY PROPORTIONED

WINDOWS

VERTICALLY PROPORTIONED

WINDOWS

POTSHELF

POTSHELF

POTSHELF

POTSHELF

POTSHELF

GABLE END

DECORATIVE ACCENT

GABLE END

DECORATIVE ACCENT
CORBEL
CORBEL

GABLE END

DECORATIVE ACCENT

FEATURE WINDOW DETAILS

CANTILEVER PROJECTION

SOFFIT DETAILS ENTRY AT PORCH GARAGE DOOR WITH COACH LIGHT

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 26
This page was intentionally left blank.

Conceptual Architectural Details - Building B
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDEB

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-3
City of San Dimas

DECORATIVE LIGHT

FIXTURE

BACKLIT ADDRESS

PANEL PATTERN

GARAGE DOOR PER

ELEVATION STYLE

PANEL PATTERN

GARAGE DOOR PER

ELEVATION STYLE

FEATURE WINDOW DETAILS

CANTILEVER PROJECTION

GARAGE DOOR WITH COACH LIGHT

SOFFIT AT PORCH

WOOD POST AND

BEAM AT ENTRY

WOOD POST AND

BEAM AT ENTRY
SOFFIT
SOFFIT

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

STUCCO OVER FOAM TRIM

STUCCO OVER FOAM TRIM

FIBER CEMENT TRIM

DECORATIVE SHUTTER

DECORATIVE SHUTTER

HIP ROOF HIP ROOF

HORIZONTAL PROPORTIONED

WINDOWS

VERTICALLY PROPORTIONED

WINDOWS

HORIZONTAL PROPORTIONED

WINDOWS

LAP SIDING

LAP SIDING

LAP SIDING

LAP SIDING

LAP SIDING

LAP SIDING

WOOD POST

BRICK VENEER

BRICK VENEER

BRICK VENEER

BRICK VENEER

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

CANTILEVER PROJECTION
-24” +0”

SOFFIT DETAILS ENTRY AT PORCH

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 28
This page was intentionally left blank.

Conceptual Architectural Details - Building C
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDEB

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-4
City of San Dimas

DECORATIVE LIGHT

FIXTURE

BACKLIT ADDRESS

PANEL PATTERN

GARAGE DOOR PER

ELEVATION STYLE

PANEL PATTERN

GARAGE DOOR PER

ELEVATION STYLE

SOFFIT AT PORCH

WOOD POST AND

BEAM AT ENTRY

WOOD POST AND

BEAM AT ENTRY
SOFFIT
SOFFIT

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

PANEL PATTERN

ENTRY DOOR

STUCCO OVER FOAM TRIM

STUCCO OVER FOAM TRIM

FIBER CEMENT TRIM

FIBER CEMENT TRIM FIBER CEMENT TRIM

DECORATIVE SHUTTER DECORATIVE SHUTTER

GABLE ROOF
12” OVERHANG

GABLE ROOF
12” OVERHANG

DECORATIVE

LOUVERED VENT

DECORATIVE

LOUVERED VENT

BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING

BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING

BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING

BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING

BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING

BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING

WOOD POST

STONE VENEER

STONE VENEER

STONE VENEER

STONE VENEER

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

TRIM BAND

CANTILEVER PROJECTION
-24” +0”

FEATURE WINDOW DETAILS

CANTILEVER PROJECTION

SOFFIT DETAILS ENTRY AT PORCH GARAGE DOOR WITH COACH LIGHT

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 30
This page was intentionally left blank.

PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDEB

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F G
H
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-5
City of San Dimas
Building A Elevations

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 32
This page was intentionally left blank.

PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDEB

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F G
H
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-6
City of San Dimas
Building B Elevations

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 34
This page was intentionally left blank.

PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
SCH
STUDEB

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F G
H
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-7
City of San Dimas
Building C Elevations

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 36
This page was intentionally left blank.

Conceptual Landscape Plan
P
NEW
SC
NEW
BOB
WHI
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PAR

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F G
H
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-8
City of San Dimas NORTH EXISTING RAILROAD
12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21 U19 U20
U18
U16 U17
U15
U5
U6 U7 U8
U9
U10 U11
U12
U13 U14 U3 U4
U2
U1
14 13 6 1
15 PLAN 3
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5
P=834.9 P=834.5
P=835.5
P=838.1 P=835.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8 P=846.3 P=845.9
P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5 P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9
P=851.4 P=850.8
P=853.5 P=852.0 P=839.2 P=833.9 P=854.5
C O V I N A B L V D .
"A" DRIVE (PRIVATE CO MMON DRIVEWAY & FIRE LANE)
10'-0" TEL. EASEMENT
6'-0" SCE EASEMENT
10'-0" TEL EASEMENT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY REMARKS
TREES
ACA STE Acacia salicina Willow Acacia 15 gal. 8
Low
Standard
ARB MAR Arbuts u. 'Marina' Marina Strawberry Tree 15 gal. 12 Low Standard
CER OCC Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 15 gal. 14 Low Standard
LAG PAT Lagunaria patersonii Primrose Tree 15 gal. 12 Low Standard
PRU CAR Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry, Columnar 15 gal. 14 Mod. Standard ROB PUR Robinia x ambigua `Purple Robe` Pink Flowering Locust 15 gal. 4 Low
Standard
TRI ELG Tristania laurina 'Elegant' Elegant Water Gum 15 gal. 18 Mod. Standard

PLANT SCHEDULE
TOTAL PROPOSED SITE TREES: 82 - 15 Gallon

WUCOLS/ SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE: Common Area
(Slope Area - 2,256 sf.) (CMP area - 2,118 sf.)
LANDSCAPE: Private Yard
(slopes 3' H. - 802 sf.)

ENTRY WALKS

PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
COMMON SIDEWALK along FIRE LANE

CROSSWALKS
(Common Slope Area)
(CMP area)
(Private Yard Slope Areas )

REFERENCE LEGEND

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 38
This page was intentionally left blank.

Guest Parking Display Plan
PARK

NEW RIVER
SCHOOL

NEW RIVER
BOB
WHITE
SCHOOL

LAKELAND
PARK
ST

HERMOSILLO PARK
SCHOOL

SANCHEZ
SCHOOL
A M. GLAZIER

B C D E F GH
7 1

ER PUBLIC FACILITY
ARY
K

LTH CENTER

STATION
901 W Covina Boulevard Project
Figure 3-9
City of San Dimas
12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2
U22
U21 U19 U20 U18
U16 U17
U15
U5
U6 U7 U8 U9
U10 U11
U12 U13 U14 U3 U4 U2
U1
14 13 6 1 15
PLAN 3 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1
P=834.5 P=834.9 P=834.5 P=835.5
P=838.1 P=835.1
P=838.5
P=846.5
P=847.8 P=846.3 P=845.9 P=845.9
P=845.5 P=839.1
P=839.5 P=838.9 P=838.5
P=851.2
P=851.9 P=851.4 P=850.8
P=853.5 P=852.0 P=839.2 P=833.9 P=854.5
LOT 16
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
15 )
)
( ( *
*
' ' S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 D27-28 D25-26 D23-24 D21-22 D19-20 D17-18 D15-16 D13-14 D11-12 D9-10 D7-8 D5-6 D3-4 D1-2 D29-30 D31-32 D33-34 D35-36 D37-38 D39-40 D41-42 D43-44 SCALE: 1" =30' 0 30 60 90 S1 to S12 S13 to S19 137 44 D1 to D44 12 11 10 9 8
7 5
4 3
2 U22U21 U19 U20 U18 U16 U17 U15 U5 U6 U7 U8 U9 U10 U11 U12 U13 U14 U3 U4 U2 U1 14 13 6 1 15 PLAN 3 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 3PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 P=849.4 P=847.9 P=846.2 P=844.0 P=841.8 P=840.2 P=838.2 P=837.3 P=836.4 P=835.2 P=834.1 P=834.5 P=834.9 P=834.5 P=835.5 P=838.1 P=835.1 P=838.5 P=846.5 P=847.8 P=846.3 P=845.9 P=845.9 P=845.5 P=839.1 P=839.5 P=838.9 P=838.5 P=851.2 P=851.9 P=851.4 P=850.8 P=853.5 P=852.0 P=839.2 P=833.9 P=854.5 LOT 16 14 13 12 11 10 9 87
6 5
4 3
2 1 15
)
)
%
%
&
&
(
(
*
*
'
'
$
$ S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 D27-28 D25-26 D23-24 D21-22 D19-20 D17-18 D15-16 D13-14 D11-12 D9-10 D7-8 D5-6 D3-4 D1-2 D29-30 D31-32 D33-34 D35-36 D37-38 D39-40 D41-42 D43-44 SCALE: 1" =30' 0 30 60 90 S1 to S12 S13 to S19 137 44 D1 to D44

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 40
This page was intentionally left blank.

901 W Covina Blvd Project
Class 32 CEQA Exemption Checklist
City of San Dimas 41

4. CLASS 32 INFILL EXEMPTION REQUIREMENTS
Article 19 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15300 to 15333), includes a list of classes of projects that have been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment and as a result, are exempt from review under CEQA.

Class 32 Infill Exemption
One of the classes of projects exempt from CEQA review are projects that are specified as urban infill development. CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 defines the Class 32 Infill Exemption as a project that meets the following five requirements:
a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

Exceptions
In addition to meeting the five requirements stated above, the CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 provides specific instances where exceptions apply to a project that would otherwise meet the requirements for an exemption. These exceptions are:
a) Location: Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, State, or local agencies.
b) Cumulative Impact: All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. c) Significant Effects: A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. d) Scenic Highways: A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a State scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR. e) Hazardous Waste Sites: A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list complied pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. f) Historical Resources: A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of historical resources.

4.1. PROPOSED PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION
The analysis below provides substantial evidence that the proposed Project properly qualifies for an exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (i.e., Class 32) and, as a result, would not have a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, the analysis shows there are no exceptions to qualifying for the categorical exemption, as identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.