Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, January 16, 2024 (part 4 of 8)

Brodiaea filifolia thread-leaved
brodiaea

FT, SE,
CRPR: 1B.1,
MSHCP:

Group 3
Perennial bulbiferous herb. Found in floodplains in semi-alkaline mudflats, vernal pools, mesic southern needlegrass grassland, mixed nativenonnative grassland, alkali grassland, and alluvial fan sage scrub plant communities. Requires very heavy clay soils. The range of this species extends from the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains at Glendora in Los Angeles County, east to Arrowhead Hot Springs in the western foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains in San Bernardino County, and south through eastern Orange and western Riverside Counties to the City of San Diego.

Elevation: 25 – 860 meters
Blooming period: March - June
Low. Site lacks wetland
conditions and clay
soils.

Calochortus
plummerae
Plummer's
mariposa-lily
CRPR: 4.2,
MSHCP:

Group 2
Perennial bulbiferous herb endemic to California. Habitat includes granitic, rocky soils within chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, and valley and foothill grassland. Threatened by development, fire suppression, foot traffic, mining, powerline construction, and recreational activities. Less common at higher elevations.

Elevation: < 1700 meters
Blooming period: May - July
Low. No habitat on site
and no nearby
occurrences.

Caulanthus
simulans
Payson's
jewelflower
CRPR: 4.2,
FSS
MSHCP:

Group 1
Payson's jewelflower occurs in pinyon-juniper woodland, chaparral and coastal sage scrub, typically on north-facing slopes and ridgelines on sandy-granitic soils. This species frequently occurs on rocky steep slopes, in burned areas or in disturbed sites such as streambeds.

Elevation: 90 - 2200 meters
Blooming period: (Feb)March – May(Jun)
Low. No habitat on site
and no nearby
occurrences.

Centromadia
pungens ssp. laevis
smooth tarplant CRPR: 1B.1,
MSHCP:

Group 3
Suitable habitat for the smooth tarplant includes alkali scrub, alkali playas, and grasslands with alkaline affinities.

Elevation: 0 – 640 meters
Blooming period: April - September
Low. Numerous nearby
occurrences, however,
species not observed
during the August 2021
or April 2022 plant
surveys.

Chorizanthe peninsular CRPR: 4.2 Annual herb found in open habitats, typically on granitic-derived or alluvial Low. No habitat on site

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-6
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
leptotheca spineflower MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
surfaces. At higher elevations, this species appears to be associated with chaparral, sage scrub and coniferous forest openings and at lower elevations it is typically associated with old formation alluvial benches.

Elevation: 300 - 1600 meters
Blooming period: May - August
and nearby occurrences
occur in very different
habitat and soils
(alluvial fan/washes).

Chorizanthe parryi
var. parryi
Parry's
spineflower
CRPR: 1B.1,

BLMS, FSS,
MSHCP:

Group 2
Parry's spineflower occurs within the alluvial chaparral and scrub of the San Gabriel, San Bernardino and San Jacinto Mountains.

Elevation: 90 – 800 meters
Blooming period: April - June
Low. No habitat on site
and nearby occurrences
occur in very different
habitat and soils.

Deinandra
mohavensis
(formerly known as
Hemizonia
mohavensis)
Mojave tarplant SE, CRPR:
1B.2, BLMS,
FSS
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Mojave tarplant can be found in low sand bars in riverbeds, along stream channels and in ephemeral grassy areas in riparian scrub and chaparral.

Elevation: 460 - 1600 meters
Blooming period: (May)June – Oct(Jan)
Low. No suitable
habitat. One recorded
occurrence from 1995
within the San Jacinto
River (~2 mi NE of site).

Deinandra
paniculata
San Diego
tarplant
(paniculate
tarplant)
CRPR: 4.2 Occurs as a dominant or co-dominant plant in the herbaceous layer of grasslands, forblands, openings of coastal sage scrub and oak woodland.

Often in sandy soils.

Elevation: < 1300 meters
Blooming period: (Mar)April – November(Dec)
Low. Nearby
occurrences, however
species not observed
during the August 2021
or April 2022 plant
surveys.

Dudleya multicaulis many-stemmed
dudleya
CRPR: 1B.2,

BLMS, FSS
MSHCP:

Group 3
Many-stemmed dudleya is often associated with clay soils in barrens, rocky places, and ridgelines as well as thinly vegetated openings in chaparral, coastal sage scrub, and southern needlegrass grasslands on clay soils.

Elevation: 15 – 790 meters
Blooming period: April - July
Low. No habitat on site
and nearby occurrences
occur in very different
habitat and soils.

Dudleya viscida sticky-leaved
dudleya
CRPR 1B.2,
FSS
MSHCP:

Group 2
and Table 9-
Perennial herb endemic to California. Occurs on bluffs and rocky cliffs.

Known from southern South Coast of Orange and San Diego Counties. Also within chaparral, sage scrub, and coastal bluff scrub within the Santa Ana Mountains of western Riverside County on mesic, mostly north-facing, and often steep, rocky canyon slopes.

Low. No habitat on site
and no nearby
occurrences.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-7
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
3 Elevation: 10 - 550 meters
Blooming period: May -June
Galium
californicum ssp.
primum
California
bedstraw (Alvin
Meadow
bedstraw)
CRPR: 1B.2,

BLMS, FSS,
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
A perennial herb found in granitic and sandy soils with chaparral or lower montane coniferous forests.

Elevation: 1350 – 1700 meters
Blooming period: May - July
Absent. There is no
habitat on site, site is
well below the
elevational range and
there are no nearby
occurrences.

Heuchera
hirsutissima
shaggy-haired
alumroot
CRPR: 1B.2,
FSS
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Shaggy-haired alumroot is known from rocky areas and granite crevices within upper-montane coniferous forest and subalpine coniferous forest.

Elevation: 2,200 - 3,500 meters
Blooming period: May (June) - July
Absent. There is no
habitat on site, site is
well below the
elevational range and
there are no nearby
occurrences.

Holocarpha virgata
ssp. elongata
graceful tarplant
(also curving
tarplant)
CRPR: 4.2
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
This plant is endemic to Orange County, Riverside County and San Diego County. It is known from heavy clay soils around vernal pools and wet meadows.

Elevation: < 900 meters
Blooming period: May - November
Low. Site lacks suitable
habitat and soils and no
nearby occurrences.

Hordeum
intercedens
vernal barley CRPR: 3.2
MSHCP:

Group 2
Annual herb native to California and Baja California. Habitat includes vernal pools; mesic grasslands; dry, saline streambeds; and alkaline flats.

Known from the San Joaquin Valley, the outer South Coast Ranges, the Couth Coast, the Channel Islands, the Peninsular Ranges, and northwest Baja California. In Riverside County, vernal barley is found in the Domino, Willows and Traver soils series and is associated with alkali flats and flood plains within the alkali vernal plains community. Within this community vernal barley is primarily associated with alkali annual grasslands and vernal pools and to a lesser extent alkali scrub and alkali playa.

Elevation: 5 – 1,000 meters
Blooming period: March - June
Low. Alkaline and
Traver soils occur on
portions of site,
however, no floodplain
or wetland conditions
occur.

Species not observed
during the April 20,
2022 focused rare plant
survey.

Hulsea vestita ssp.
callicarpha
beautiful hulsea CRPR: 4.2
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Typically grows within chaparral and lower montane coniferous forests.

Prefers granitic soils, rock or gravelly soils in chaparral and in open areas of montane conifer forest.

Elevation: 1300 – 2500 meters
Absent. There is no
habitat on site, site is
well below the species
elevational range, and

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-8
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
Blooming period: May - October there are no nearby
occurrences.

Imperata brevifolia California
satintail
CRPR 2B.1,
FSS
Perennial rhizomatous herb. Occurs in mesic habitats (wet springs, meadows, streambanks, floodplains); chaparral, coastal scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, alkali meadows, and riparian scrub habitat.

Elevation: 0 - 1215 meters
Blooming period: September - May
Low. Site lacks suitable
habitat and no nearby
occurrences.

Lasthenia glabrata
ssp. coulteri
Coulter's
goldfields
CRPR: 1B.1,
BLMS
MSHCP:

Group 3
Coulter's goldfields is associated with low-lying alkali habitats along the coast and in inland valleys. Most of the populations are associated with coastal salt marsh. In Riverside County, Coulter's goldfields occur primarily in highly alkaline, silty-clay soils in association with Traver, Domino and Willows soils. Most Riverside County populations are associated with the Willows soil series. Coulter's goldfields occur primarily in the alkali vernal plains community.

Elevation: 1 – 1200 meters
Blooming period: February - June
Low. Alkaline and
Traver soils occur on
portions of site,
however, no floodplain
or wetland conditions
occur.

Species not observed
during the April 2022
focused rare plant
survey.

Lilium humboldtii
ssp. ocellatum
ocellated
Humboldt lily
CRPR: 4.2
MSHCP:

Group 2
and Table 9-
3 Ocellated Humboldt lily is associated with riparian corridors in lower montane coniferous forest and coastal chaparral. This species typically occurs on lower stream benches but can also occur on shaded, dry slopes, beneath a dense coniferous canopy and cismontane oak woodland.

Elevation: Below 1,691 meters
Blooming period: March – July (August)
Absent. Species occurs
at higher ends of its
elevational range in the
inland area, there is no
habitat on site and
there are no nearby
occurrences.

Lilium parryi lemon lily CRPR: 1B.2,
FSS
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Typical habitat consists of forested, shady stream banks within narrow canyon bottoms. Lemon lily requires moisture year-round and the distribution of this species is limited to the banks of seeps, springs and permanent streams.

Elevation: 1300 – 2600 meters
Blooming period: July - August
Absent. Site is well
below the elevational
range, there is no
habitat on site and
there are no nearby
occurrences.

Mimulus clevelandii
(also Diplacus
clevelandii)
Cleveland's bush
monkeyflower
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Habitat includes gabbroic, often disturbed areas, and rocky. Occurs in chaparral, cismontane woodland and lower montane coniferous forests.

Elevation: 915 – 1465 meters
Blooming period: April - June
Absent. Site is well
below the elevational
range, there is no
habitat on site and

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-9
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
there are no nearby
occurrences.

Muhlenbergia
californica
California muhly CRPR: 4.2
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
A perennial grass found in mesic, seeps and streambanks. Habitat includes chaparral, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, meadows and seeps.

Elevation: 100 – 2000 meters
Blooming period: June - September
Absent. Species occurs
at higher ends of its
elevational range in the
inland area. There are
no nearby occurrences
and no habitat on site.

Myosurus minimus
ssp. apus
little mousetail CRPR: 3.1
MSHCP:

Group 3
Little mousetail occurs in association with vernal pools and within the alkali vernal pools and alkali annual grassland components of alkali vernal plains.

Elevation: 20 – 640 meters
Blooming period: March - June
Low. No vernal pool or
other wetland habitats
on site.

Nama stenocarpa mud nama CRPR 2B.2
MSHCP:

Group 3
Annual/perennial herb occurring in marsh and swamp habitat of lake margins and riverbanks.

Elevation: < 810 meters
Blooming period: January - July
Low. Site lacks suitable
habitat and no nearby
occurrences.

Navarretia fossalis spreading
navarretia
FT, CRPR:
1B.1
MSHCP:

Group 3
Annual herb native to California and Baja California. Habitat includes chenopod scrub, marshes and swamps (assorted shallow freshwater), playas, and vernal pools. Threatened by urbanization, agriculture, road construction, grazing, flood control, non-native plants, illegal dumping, foot traffic, and vehicles.

Elevation: 30 - 655 meters
Blooming period: April - June
Low. Site lacks suitable
habitat and no nearby
occurrences.

Orcuttia californica California Orcutt
grass

FE, SE,
CRPR: 1B.1
MSHCP:

Group 3
All known California Orcutt grass localities are associated with vernal pools.

Elevation: < 700 meters
Blooming period: April - August
Low. Site lacks suitable
habitat and no nearby
occurrences.

Oxytheca
caryophylloides
chickweed
oxytheca
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Habitat includes montane coniferous forest (yellow pine forest) on sandy soils.

Elevation: 1,300 - 2,600 meters
Blooming period: July – September (October)
Absent. Site is well
below the elevational
range, there is no
habitat and there are
no nearby occurrences.

Polygala cornuta Fish's milkwort CRPR: 4.3 Perennial deciduous shrub native to California and Baja California. often Low. No nearby

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-10
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
var. fishiae MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
associated with shaded areas within cismontane oak woodlands and riparian woodlands, although it also occurs in xeric and mesic chaparral habitat.

Elevation: 90 - 1270 meters
Blooming period: May - August
occurrences and no
habitat on site.

Potentilla rimicola cliff cinquefoil CRPR: 2B.2,
FSS
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Cliff cinquefoil is a perennial plant which grows in granitic crevices within upper montane and subalpine coniferous forest.

Elevation: 2400 – 2800 meters
Blooming period: July – September
Absent. There is no
habitat on site, site is
well below the species
elevational range and
there are no nearby
occurrences.

Pseudognaphalium
leucocephalum
white rabbit
tobacco
CRPR: 2B.2 Sandy or gravelly benches, dry stream bottoms, and canyon bottoms.

Elevation: < 500 meters
Blooming period: (July) August – November (December)
Low. No habitat on site
and the only nearby
occurrence is within
San Jacinto River >2 mi
east of site.

Quercus
engelmannii
Engelmann oak CRPR: 4.2,
MSHCP:

Group 2
Native to the foothills from eastern Los Angeles County south to eastern San Diego County. Found in pure stands and with coast live oak. Often found in chaparral, cismontane woodland, riparian woodland, and valley and foothill grassland.

Elevation: < 1300 meters
Blooming period: March - June
Absent. There is no
habitat on site, and
there are no nearby
occurrences.

Romneya coulteri Coulter's matilija
poppy
CRPR: 4.2
MSHCP:

Group 1 and
Table 9-3
This poppy is native to southern California and Baja California, where it grows in dry canyons in chaparral and coastal sage scrub plant communities, sometimes in areas recently burned. It is a popular ornamental plant, kept for its large, showy flowers.

Elevation: < 1200 meters
Blooming period: March – July (August)
Low. There is no habitat
on site, and there are
no nearby occurrences.

Sidalcea
neomexicana
salt spring
checkerbloom
CRPR: 2B.2,
FSS
It can be found in a diverse number of alkaline/mesic habitat types including chaparral and coastal sage scrub, Yellow Pine Forest, and riparian zones, creosote bush scrub, and alkali flats and other salty substrates. Possibly extirpated from the Western Transverse Ranges (Baldwin et al. 2012).

Elevation: 15 – 1,530 meters
Low. Nearby historical
collections and alkaline
soils occur on site,
however,
species not observed
during the April 20,

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-11
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
Blooming period: March - June 2022 focused rare plant
survey.

Tortula californica California screwmossCRPR: 1B.2,
BLMS
Moss endemic to California. Habitat includes sandy soils, chenopod scrub, and valley and foothill grassland.

Elevation: 10 - 1460 meters
Blooming period: N/A
Low. There are no
nearby occurrences and
extensive ground
disturbances likely
excludes this species.

Trichocoronis
wrightii var.
wrightii
Wright’s
trichocoronis
CRPR: 2B.1
MSHCP:

Group 3
Annual herb native to California, Baja California, and Texas. Habitat includes alkaline soils, meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps, riparian forest, and vernal pools. Wright's trichocoronis is highly dependent on alkaline soils that are saturated for extended periods of time. Habitat lost to agriculture and urbanization.

Elevation: < 500 meters
Blooming period: May - September
Low. Alkaline soils
present in portions of
the site, but site lacks
mesic conditions and
no nearby occurrences.

INVERTEBRATES
Bombus crotchii Crotch bumble
bee
SCE Uncommon species of coastal California east towards the Sierras; select food plan genera include Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, Eriogonum. Also like lotus, Encelia sp., milk weed, and nonnative grassland. Don’t prefer dense non-native vegetation. Nest in the ground but are not limited by compact soils unless no rodent burrows or crevices are present. Highly impacted by urbanization; unlikely to be found in fragmented habitats and more likely to be found in large undisturbed areas or sites with direct connections to large undisturbed areas.

Low. Food genera do
not occur onsite. Site is
disturbed, is
surrounded by
development and
disconnected from
large undisturbed
areas.

AMPHIBIANS
Spea hammondii
(also Scaphiopus
hammondii)
western
spadefoot toad

SSC, BLMS,
MSHCP:

Group 2
Prefers open areas with sandy or gravelly soils, in a variety of habitats including mixed woodlands, grasslands, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, sandy washes, lowlands, river floodplains, alluvial fans, playas, alkali flats, foothills, and mountains. Rainpools lasting a significant amount of time and which do not contain bullfrogs, fish, or crayfish are necessary for breeding. Typically found in areas with good native vegetative cover and low levels of disturbance.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

REPTILES
Anniella stebbinsi Southern SSC, FSS Occurs in moist warm loose soil with plant cover. Moisture is essential. Low. Project Footprint

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-12
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
California Legless
Lizard
Occurs in sparsely vegetated areas of beach dunes, chaparral, pine-oak woodlands, desert scrub, sandy washes, and stream terraces with sycamores, cottonwoods, or oaks. Leaf litter under trees and bushes in sunny areas and dunes stabilized with bush lupine and mock heather often indicate suitable habitat.
lacks suitable habitat.

Arizona elegans
occidentalis
California glossy
snake
SSC Inhabits arid scrub, rocky washes, grasslands, chaparral. Appears to prefer microhabitats of open areas and areas with soil loose enough for easy burrowing.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Aspidoscelis
hyperythra
orange-throated
whiptail

WL, FSS,
MSHCP:

Group 1
Inhabits low-elevation coastal scrub, chaparral, and valley-foothill hardwood habitats. Prefers washes & other sandy areas with patches of brush & rocks. Perennial plants necessary for its major food-termites.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Charina bottae
umbratica
southern rubber
boa

ST, FSS
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
The rubber boa is often found in fallen debris, rock piles, and steep, rocky montane areas within coniferous forests, woodlands, chaparral, and grasslands above 1,540 meters in elevation.

Absent. Project
Footprint is outside of
known elevation range
for the species.

Crotalus ruber red-diamond
rattlesnake

FSS, SSC
MSHCP:

Group 2
Chaparral, woodland, grassland, and desert areas from coastal San Diego County to the eastern slopes of the mountains. Occurs in rocky areas and dense vegetation. Needs rodent burrows, cracks in rocks or surface cover objects.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Lampropeltis
zonata parvirubra
San Bernardino
mountain
kingsnake
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
The San Bernardino mountain kingsnake is only known to occur within the San Bernardino Mountains and San Jacinto Mountains bioregions above 1,500 meters. They are restricted to rock outcrops, talus, and steep shady canyons within coniferous and mixed coniferous, hardwood, or riparian woodlands and other edge Habitats when associated with coniferous Habitat.

Absent. Project
Footprint is outside of
known elevation range
for the species.

Lampropeltis
zonata pulchra
San Diego
mountain
kingsnake
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
The San Diego mountain kingsnake is only known to occur within the Santa Ana Mountains, Aqua-Tibia Mountains, and Desert Transition Bioregions above 500 meters in elevation. They are restricted to rock outcrops, talus, and steep shady canyons within coniferous and mixed coniferous, hardwood, or riparian woodlands.

Absent. Project
Footprint is outside of
known elevation range
for the species.

Phrynosoma
blainvillii
coast horned
lizard
SSC, BLMS Inhabits open areas of sandy soil and low vegetation in valleys, foothills and semiarid mountains. Found in grasslands, coniferous forests, woodlands, and chaparral, with open areas and patches of loose soil.

Often found in lowlands along sandy washes with scattered shrubs and Low. Adjacency to
urban development and
decades of disturbance
onsite likely preclude

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-13
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
along dirt roads. Often found near ant hills feeding on ants. The species is common in most areas of the MSHCP Plan Area except where adjacent to urban situations.
this species. Only one
recorded occurrence
(from 1963) of the
species within 2 miles
of the Project Footprint.

Sceloporus
graciousus
vandenburgianus
southern
sagebrush lizard
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
The sagebrush lizard occurs primarily in open montane areas with good light and scattered low bushes. Habitats in which it is found includes montane chaparral, sage brush, hardwood and conifer forests and woodlands and juniper woodlands.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

BIRDS
Agelaius tricolor tricolored
blackbird

ST, SSC,

BLMS, BCC,
MSHCP:

Group 3
Freshwater marshes. Suitable breeding habitat includes cattails and bulrushes.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Ammodramus
savannarum
Grasshopper
Sparrow
SSC,
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Breeds in open grasslands, prairies, hayfields, and pastures, typically with some bare ground. Grasshopper Sparrows usually avoid breeding in grasslands with extensive shrub cover but are a bit more tolerant of shrubs in migration and during the winter. Nests are domed with grasses, typically well concealed in depressions at the base of grass clumps.

Sensitive to edge effects and requires relatively large blocks of contiguous habitat. Valley and foothill (native) grasslands are the preferred habitat although non-native grasslands are used by the species as well.

Moderate. Project
Footprint includes
moderately suitable
breeding and foraging
habitat.

Athene cunicularia burrowing owl SSC, BCC,
BLMS,
MSHCP:

Group 3
Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts and scrublands characterized by low-growing vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel.

Moderate. Project
Footprint includes
suitable burrows. No
burrowing owls or their
sign were observed
during focused surveys
conducted in 2021 and
2022.

Buteo regalis ferruginous hawk WL, BCC,
MSHCP:

Group 1
Live in the open spaces of the West, in grasslands, prairie, sagebrush steppe, scrubland, and pinyon-juniper woodland edges. Present in southern California in the winter.

Moderate. Project
Footprint offers
suitable foraging
habitat but lacks

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-14
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
suitable nesting habitat
for the species.

Coccyzus
americanus
occidentalis
western yellowbilled cuckooFT, SE,

BLMS, FSS,
BCC,
MSHCP:

Group 3
Woodlands, thickets, orchards, streamside groves. Breeds mostly in dense deciduous stands, including forest edges, tall thickets, dense second growth, overgrown orchards, scrubby oak woods. Often in willow groves around marshes.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead
shrike

SSC, BCC,
MSCHP:

Group 2
The species is known to forage over open ground within areas of short vegetation, pastures with fence rows, old orchards, mowed roadsides, cemeteries, golf courses, riparian areas, open woodland, agricultural fields, desert washes, desert scrub, grassland, broken chaparral and beach with scattered shrubs. Nest is placed in a dense (and often thorny) tree or shrub, usually 5-30' above the ground, occasionally higher, in a spot well hidden by foliage.

Moderate. Project
Footprint offers
suitable foraging
habitat but lacks
suitable nesting habitat
for the species.

Melospiza lincolnii Lincoln’s sparrow MSHCP:

Group 1 and
Table 9-3
Willow and alder thickets, muskeg, brushy bogs. In winter, thickets, weeds, bushes. Breeds in northern and mountainous areas in dense low vegetation near water, such as streamside willow groves, bushy edges of bogs, brushy clearings in wet coniferous forest. Winters in dense thickets, overgrown fields.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat
Plegadis chihi white-faced ibis WL, IUCN:LC
MSCHP:

Group 2
The species occurs in mainly shallow marshes with islands of emergent vegetation. They occasionally occur on spoil banks created by dredging.

They occur locally in flooded shoals and mangrove swamps. In the coastal areas of the southern portion of the range, the white-faced ibis nests mostly in wetlands of outer coastal plains, freshwater marshes of common reed, bulltongue, saltmeadow cordgrass and torpedo panic grass.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Sphyrapicus
thyroideus
Williamson’s
sapsucker
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Habitat for the Williamson’s sapsucker includes montane coniferous forest dominated by lodgepole pines and firs, and oak woodlands and forests.

Requires specific micro-habitat for nesting sites (snags).

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Strix occidentalis
occidentalis
California
spotted owl

BLMS, SSC,

FSS, BCC,
MSHCP:

Group 2 and
Table 9-3
Lives in montane coniferous and oak-deciduous woodlands and forest habitats.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell's vireo FE, SE, Summer resident of Southern California in low riparian, in vicinity of water Low. Project Footprint

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-15
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
MSHCP:

Group 2
or in dry river bottoms; below 2000 ft. Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, baccharis, or mesquite.
lacks suitable habitat.

Xanthocephalus
xanthocephalus
yellow-headed
blackbird
SSC Breeds almost exclusively in marshes with tall emergent vegetation, such as tules (Scirpus spp.) or cattails (Typha spp.), generally in open areas and edges over relatively deep water.

Low. Project Footprint
lacks suitable habitat.

MAMMALS
Dipodomys
merriami parvus
San Bernardino
kangaroo rat

FE, SSC
MSHCP:

Group 3
This species is typically found in Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub and sandy loam soils, alluvial fans and flood plains, and along washes with nearby sage scrub, chaparral and even disturbed areas that are associated with alluvial processes. Soil texture is a primary factor in this subspecies' occurrence. Sandy loam substrates allow for the digging of simple, shallow burrows. The species is found in open grassland habitats where the sparse vegetation is mainly composed of shrubs, sagebrush, grasses and forbs.

Low. Project Footprint
contains sandy loam
soils but is not located
near a wash nor is the
site associated with
alluvial processes.

Dipodomys
stephensi
Stephens'
kangaroo rat

FE, ST,
MSHCP:

Group 2
The species is found in open grassland habitats where the sparse vegetation is mainly composed of shrubs, sagebrush, grasses and forbs.

Species avoids dense grasses (for example, non-native bromes) and are more likely to inhabit areas where the annual forbs disarticulate in the summer and leave more open areas. As a fossorial (burrowing) animal, the Stephens' kangaroo rat typically is found in sandy and sandy loam soils with a low clay to gravel content, although there are exceptions where they can utilize the burrows of Botta's pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) and California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi).

Low. Project Footprint
has been disturbed for
decades and is
surrounded by
development. One
historic occurrence
from 1963 overlays the
site. More recent
occurrences in the
vicinity are all within or
adjacent to San Jacinto
River >3 miles from
Project Footprint.

Glaucomys sabrinus
californicus
San Bernardino
flying squirrel

SSC, FSS
MSHCP:

Group 3 and
Table 9-3
The San Bernardino flying squirrel lives in high-elevation, mixed-conifer forests dominated by Jeffrey pine, white fir and black oak between 4,600 and 7,550 feet.

Absent. Project
Footprint is located
outside of known
elevation range and
lacks suitable habitat.

Lasiurus blossevillii western red bat SSC, IUCN: Locally common in some areas of California, occurring from Shasta Co. to Moderate; Marginal

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-16
Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for
Occurrence within
the Project Footprint
LC

WBWG (H)
the Mexican border, west of the Sierra Nevada/Cascade crest. Not found in desert areas. Roosts primarily in trees, less often in shrubs. Roost sites often are in edge habitats adjacent to streams, fields, or urban areas. suitable roosting
habitat occurs on and
adjacent to the site.

Lasiurus xanthinus western yellow
bat
SSC,

WBWG (H)
Year-round resident of southern CA, found below 2000 ft in or near foothill or desert riparian habitats. Roosts in trees, including palm trees, in and near palm oases and riparian habitats.

Moderate; Project
Footprint contains a
few palm trees that
could be potential
roosting and foraging
habitat.

Perognathus
longimembris
brevinasus
Los Angeles
pocket mouse
SSC
MSHCP:

Group 3
Inhabits lower elevation grassland, alluvial sage scrub, and coastal sage scrub in areas with soils composed of fine sands. They spend most of their foraging time in or near bushes, scrubs, rock crevices, or other sources of cover. Prefers habitat similar to that of the Stephens’ kangaroo rat and San Bernardino kangaroo rat. Extirpated from most or all of the San Fernando and San Bernardino valleys.

Low. Project Footprint
has been disturbed for
decades and is
surrounded by
development. Closest
recorded occurrences
are within San Jacinto
River located >1.5 mi
north of the Project
Footprint.

Taxidea taxus American badger SCC Most abundant in drier open stages of most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats with friable soils. American badgers enlarge hunting burrows for concealment, protection from weather, and as natal dens; burrows are up to 30 feet (10 m) long and 10 feet (3 m) deep. Large mounds of soil are built up at burrow entrances.

Low; while the Project
Footprint includes
herbaceous/grassy
habitat, decades of
disturbance within the
site likely deters this
species. No American
badger burrows were
observed onsite.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-17
Legend
Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) Listing Codes: federal listing is pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA).

FE = federally listed as endangered: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of their range.

FT = federally listed as threatened: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that is considered likely to become endangered throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the foreseeable future.

FCE = federal candidate endangered.

FD = federally delisted species.

California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Listing Codes: state listing is pursuant to § 1904 (Native Plant Protection Act of 1977) and §2074.2 and §2075.5 (California Endangered Species Act of 1984) of the Fish and Game Code, relating to listing of Endangered, Threatened and Rare species of plants and animals.

SE = state listed as endangered: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that are in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of their range.

ST = state listed as threatened: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that, although not presently threatened with extinction, is likely to become an endangered species in the foreseeable future.

SCE = state listed as candidate endangered.

SD = state delisted species
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW):

SSC = species of special concern: status applies to animals which 1) are declining at a rate that could result in listing, or 2) historically occurred in low numbers and known threats to their persistence currently exist. The CDFW has designated certain vertebrate species as “species of special concern” because declining population levels, limited ranges, and/or continuing threats have made them vulnerable to extinction.

FP = Fully protected: animal species may not be taken or possessed at any time and no licenses or permits may be issued for their take except for collecting these species for necessary scientific research and relocation of the bird species for the protection of livestock.

WL = watch list: these birds have been designated as “Taxa to Watch” in the California Bird Species of Special Concern report (Shuford and Gardali 2008). The report defines “Taxa to Watch” as those that are not on the current special concern list that (1) formerly were on the 1978 (Remsen 1978) or 1992 (CDFG 1992) special concern lists and are not currently listed as state threatened and endangered; (2) have been removed (delisted) from either the state or federal threatened and endangered lists (and remain on neither), or (3) are currently designated as “fully protected” in California.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS):

BCC = USFWS bird of conservation concern: listed in the USFWS’S 2008 Birds of Conservation Concern report. The report identifies species, subspecies, and populations of all migratory non-game birds that, without additional conservation actions, are likely to become candidates for listing under the ESA. While all of the bird species included in the report are priorities for conservation action, the list makes no finding with regard to whether they warrant consideration for ESA listing.

United States Forest Service (USFS):

FSS = Forest Service sensitive: those plant and animal species identified by a Regional Forester that are not listed or proposed for listing under the ESA and for which population viability is a concern, as evidenced by: (a) significant current or predicted downward trends in population numbers or density or (b) significant current or

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-18
predicted downward trends in habitat capability that would reduce a species' existing distribution.” United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM):

BLMS = BLM sensitive: those plant and animal species on BLM administered lands and that are (1) under status review by the USFWS/NMFS; or (2) whose numbers are declining so rapidly that federal listing may become necessary, or (3) with typically small and widely dispersed populations; or (4) those inhabiting ecological refugia or other specialized or unique habitats. BLM policy is to provide the same level of protection as USFWS candidate species.

California Rare Plant Ranks (Formerly known as CNPS Lists): the CNPS is a statewide, non-profit organization that maintains, with CDFG, an Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. In the spring of 2011, CNPS and CDFG officially changed the name “CNPS List” or “CNPS Ranks” to “California Rare Plant Rank” (or CPRP).

This was done to reduce confusion over the fact that CNPS and CDFG jointly manage the Rare Plant Status Review Groups and the rank assignments are the product of a collaborative effort and not solely a CNPS assignment.

CRPR: 1A - California Rare Plant Rank of 1A: Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere. Plants with a California Rare Plant Rank of 1A are presumed extirpated or extinct because they have not been seen or collected in the wild in California for many years. All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 1A meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. Should these taxa be rediscovered, and impacts proposed to individuals or their habitat, they must be analyzed during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA, or those considered to be functionally equivalent to CEQA, as they meet the definition of Rare or Endangered under CEQA Guidelines §15125 (c) and/or §15380.

CRPR: 1B - California Rare Plant Rank 1B: Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and Elsewhere. All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 1B meet the definitions of Sec. 1901, Chapter 10 (Native Plant Protection Act) or Secs. 2062 and 2067 (California Endangered Species Act) of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. It is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.

CRPR: 2A - California Rare Plant Rank 2A: Plants presumed extirpated in California but common elsewhere. Plants with a California Rare Plant Rank of 2A are presumed extirpated because they have not been observed or documented in California for many years. This list only includes plants that are presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere in their range. All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 2A meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. Should these species be rediscovered, any impacts proposed to individuals or their habitat must be analyzed during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA, or those considered to be functionally equivalent to CEQA, as they meet the definition of Rare or Endangered under CEQA Guidelines §15125 (c) and/or §15380.

CRPR: 2B - California Rare Plant Rank 2B: Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California but more common elsewhere. All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 2 meet the definitions of Sec. 1901, Chapter 10 (Native Plant Protection Act) or Secs. 2062 and 2067 (California Endangered Species Act) of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. It is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.

CRPR: 3 – California Rare Plant Rank 3: Review List: Plants about which more information is needed. Plants with a California Rare Plant Rank of 3 are united by one common theme – there is a lack of necessary information to assign them to one of the other ranks or to reject them. Nearly all of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 3 are taxonomically problematic. Many of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 3 meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-19
the California Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. Impacts to these species or their habitat should be analyzed during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA, or those considered to be functionally equivalent to CEQA, as they may meet the definition of Rare or Endangered under CEQA Guidelines §15125 (c) and/or §15380.

CRPR: 4 - California Rare Plant Rank 4: Plants of Limited Distribution - A Watch List. Very few of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 4 meet the definitions of Sec. 1901, Chapter 10 (Native Plant Protection Act) or Secs. 2062 and 2067 (California Endangered Species Act) of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and few, if any, are eligible for state listing. Nevertheless, many of them are significant locally, and CNPS and CDFG strongly recommend that California Rare Plant Rank 4 plants be evaluated for consideration during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.

California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Threat Ranks: The CNPS Threat Rank is an extension added onto the California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) and designates the level of endangerment by a 1 to 3 ranking with 1 being the most endangered and 3 being the least endangered. A Threat Rank is present for all California Rare Plant Rank 1B's, 2's, 4's, and the majority of California Rare Plant Rank 3's. California Rare Plant Rank 4 plants are seldom assigned a Threat Rank of 0.1, as they generally have large enough populations to not have significant threats to their continued existence in California; however, certain conditions exist to make the plant a species of concern and hence be assigned a California Rare Plant Rank. In addition, all California Rare Plant Rank 1A (presumed extinct in California), and some California Rare Plant Rank 3 (need more information) plants, which lack threat information, do not have a Threat Rank extension.

0.1 = seriously endangered in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat)

0.2 = fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat)

0.3 = not very threatened in California (less than 20% of occurrences threatened / low degree and immediacy of threat or no current threats known) Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP): Planning species covered by the MSHCP. Additional surveys for Narrow Endemic Plant Species and Criteria Area Species to determine presence/absence may be required.

PS = planning species
NEPSSA # = Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (with survey area number noted).

CASSA # = Criteria Area Species Survey Area (with survey area number noted).

Group 1 = Species that have wide distribution throughout the Plan Area within suitable habitat. Take coverage is warranted based upon regional or landscape level considerations, such as healthy population levels, widespread distribution throughout the MSHCP Plan Area, and life history characteristics that respond to habitat-scale conservation and management actions.

Group 2 = Species that are relatively well-distributed throughout the MSCHP Plan Area. Take coverage is warranted based on regional or landscape level considerations with the addition of site-specific conservation and management requirements that are clearly identified in the MSHCP for species that are generally well-distributed, but that have Core Areas that require Conservation.

Group 3 = Species that have narrow habitat requirements and limited distribution within the Plan Area. Take coverage is warranted based upon site specific considerations and the identification of specific conservation and management conditions for species within a narrowly defined Habitat or limited geographic area within the MSHCP Plan Area.

Western Bat Working Group (WBWG): The WBWG is composed of agencies, organizations, and individuals interested in bat research, management, and conservation

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-20
from the 13 western states and provinces. The goals are (1) to facilitate communication among interested parties and reduce risks of species decline or extinction; (2) to provide a mechanism by which current information on bat ecology, distribution, and research techniques can be readily accessed; and (3) to develop a forum to discuss conservation strategies, provide technical assistance, and encourage education programs. Species are ranked as High, Medium, or Low Priority in each of 10 regions in western North America. Because California includes multiple regions where a species may have different WBWG Priority ranks, the CNNDB includes categories for Medium-High, and Low-Medium Priority.

WBWG-H= High Priority
WBWG-M= Medium Priority
WBWG-L= Low Priority
American Fisheries Society: Listing of imperiled freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee.

AFS-E= Endangered
AFS-TH= Threatened
AFS-V= Vulnerable
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): The IUCN assesses, on a global scale, the conservation status of species, subspecies, varieties and even selected subpopulations in order to highlight taxa threatened with extinction, and therefore promote their conservation. Detailed information on the IUCN and the Red List is available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org
IUCN-CR = Critically endangered
IUCN-EN = Endangered
IUCN-NT = Near threatened
IUCN-VU = Vulnerable
IUCN-LC = Least concern
IUCN-DD = Data deficient
IUCN-CD = Conservation dependent
NatureServe Element Ranking: This ranking system’s units of conservation may include non-taxonomic biological entities such as populations or ecological communities, thus, NatureServe refers to the targets of biological conservation as “elements” rather than taxa. The three main categories that are taken into consideration when assigning an element rank are rarity, threats, and trends.

The global rank (G-rank) is a reflection of the overall status of an element throughout its global range:

GX: Presumed Extinct – Not located despite intensive searches and virtually no likelihood of rediscovery.

GH: Possibly Extinct – Known from only historical occurrences but still some hope of rediscovery. Examples of evidence include (1) that a species has not been documented in approximately 20-40 years despite some searching and/or some evidence of significant habitat loss or degradation; (2) that a species has been searched for unsuccessfully, but not thoroughly enough to presume that it is extinct throughout its range.

G1: Critically Imperiled – At very high risk of extinction due to very restricted range, very few populations or occurrences, very steep declines, very severe threats, or other factors.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix C – Special Status Species Potential Occurrence San Jacinto Residential Development Project TTM 38202

C-21
G2: Imperiled – At high risk of extinction due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors.

G3: Vulnerable – At moderate risk of extinction due to a fairly restricted range, relatively few populations or occurrences, recent and widespread declines, threats, or other factors.

G4: Apparently Secure – At fairly low risk of extinction due to an extensive range and/or many populations or occurrences, but with possible cause for some concern as a result of local recent declines, threats, or other factors.

G5: Secure – At very low risk of extinction due to a very extensive range, abundant populations or occurrences, and little to no concern from declines or threats.

GNR: Unranked – Global rank not yet assessed.

The state rank (S-rank) refers to the imperilment status only within California’s state boundaries:

SX: Presumed Extirpated – Species is believed to be extirpated from the state. Not located despite intensive searches of historical sites and other appropriate habitat, and virtually no likelihood that it will be rediscovered SH: Possibly Extirpated – Known from only historical records but still some hope of rediscovery. There is evidence that the species may no longer be present in the state, but not enough to state this with certainty. Examples of such evidence include (1) that a species has not been documented in approximately 20-40 years despite some searching and/or some evidence of significant habitat loss or degradation; (2) that a species has been searched for unsuccessfully, but not thoroughly enough to presume that it is no longer present in the jurisdiction.

S1: Critically Imperiled – At very high risk of extirpation in the state due to very restricted range, very few populations or occurrences, very steep declines, severe threats, or other factors.

S2: Imperiled – At high risk of extirpation in the state due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors.

S3: Vulnerable – At moderate risk of extirpation in the state due to a fairly restricted range, relatively few populations or occurrences, recent and widespread declines, threats, or other factors.

S4: Apparently Secure – At a fairly low risk of extirpation in the state due to an extensive range and/or many populations or occurrences, but with possible cause for some concern as a result of local recent declines, threats, or other factors.

Sources:
• CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2021) • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition (Baldwin et al. 2012). • RareFind, CDFW, California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW 2021). • State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California (CDFW, July 2021). • State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California (CDFW, July 2021). • Special Animals List (CDFW, July 2021).
• Life History Accounts (CDFW).
• Sensitive List (BLM)
• Monarch (Danaus plexippus) Species Status Assessment Report, version 2.1 (USFWS, September 2020)

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Appendix D
MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Report

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022
William R. Inghram
Rockwell Land Co.
23986 Aliso Creek Road # 711
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Subject: Results of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys conducted for the approximately 34-acre Project site in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California.

Dear William:

This letter report provides a summary of existing conditions and provides the methods and results of the western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) focused burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) [BUOW] surveys conducted for the approximately 34-acre Project site (Project) in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County (Figure 1; Regional/Site Location Map).

Two sets of focused BUOW surveys were conducted for this Project. The Project site was originally approximately 27 acres, however in early 2022 a second parcel approximately 7.12 acres to the east, adjacent to the site was added to the Project requiring additional focused BUOW surveys.

The focused BUOW surveys conducted for the original 27-acre site were conducted on July 8, July 22, August 6, and August 19, 2021, by Wade Caffrey, Carla Marriner, Molly Burdick-Whipp, CJ Fotheringham, Max Ketabi, and Sierra Valladares of VCS Environmental (VCS). The Study Area for these surveys (2021 Study Area) included the 27-acre Project limits (Accessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 436-280-011, 436-280-012, 436-280-013, and 436-280-014) and a 500-foot surrounding buffer as depicted on Figure 2; Aerial Map – Burrowing Owl Study Area. No BUOW or signs thereof were observed within the Study Area during the surveys. Based on the lack of any direct or indirect evidence of BUOW presence, the survey results indicate that the Study Area was not occupied by BUOW at the time of the surveys.

The focused BUOW surveys conducted for the approximately 7.12-acre additional parcel were conducted on March 18, March 23, April 6, and April 13, 2022 by Molly Burdick-Whipp, Sierra

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 2 of 9 ends

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Regulatory, Biological & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 vcsenvironmental.com
Valladares, and Nathalie Munoz of VCS. The Study Area for these surveys (2022 Study Area) included the approximately 7.12-acre additional parcel (APN 436-280-025) and a 500-foot surrounding buffer as depicted on Figure 2; Aerial Map – Burrowing Owl Study Area. No BUOW or signs thereof were observed within the additional parcel Study Area during the surveys. Based on the lack of any direct or indirect evidence of BUOW presence, the survey results indicate that the Study Area was not occupied by BUOW at the time of the surveys.

Project Location and Existing Conditions
The Project is located in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and consists of five APNs:
436-280-011, 436-280-012, 436-280-013,436-280-014, and 436-280-025 totaling 33.8 acres (Figure 3; Site Plan). More specifically, the site is situated south of Monte Vista Middle School, east of Lyon Avenue and Appaloosa Drive, north of Cottonwood Avenue, and west of Marylin Drive and Estrella Street (Figure 2). The Project site is located within Township 4 South and Range 1 West, Section 28 of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, 7.5 Minute Series, San Jacinto (Figure 4; USGS Map).

The Project site is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell or Cell Group. A portion of the Project site is located within the MSHCP Burrowing Owl and Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (Figure 5; MSHCP Survey Areas) and subject to the burrowing owl survey requirements (MSHCP Section 6.3.2).

The topography throughout the Project site is generally flat. Elevation on the Project site is at and around 1,500 feet above mean sea level (MSL).

Project Contact Information
William R. Inghram
Rockwell Land Co.
23986 Aliso Creek Road # 711
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Phone: (831) 383-8083
Email: [email protected]
Project Biologist
Contact: Sierra Valladares
Project Manager / Biologist
VCS Environmental
30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Phone: (949) 466-9714

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 3 of 9 ends

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Regulatory, Biological & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 vcsenvironmental.com
Email: [email protected]
Burrowing Owl Survey Methods
Projects within the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Area are subject to the MSHCP burrowing owl survey requirements. Although only a portion of the Project is within the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Area, the entire Project limits, including the original Project limits and the additional parcel plus the surrounding 500-ft buffers were included within the 2021/2022 Study Areas.

Burrowing owl assessments were conducted for the original Project limits and the additional parcel. Both assessments followed the guidelines identified in Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area (County of Riverside 2006). The survey instructions note the following steps to the MSHCP burrowing owl assessment:
• Step 1: Habitat Assessment
• Step 2: Locating Burrows and Burrowing Owls
o Part A: Focused Burrow Survey
o Part B: Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys (4 separate surveys) A burrowing owl habitat assessment (Step 1) for the original Project limits was performed during the general biological survey on July 8, 2021 by VCS biologists Carla Marriner and Molly BurdickWhipp. It was immediately determined that the Project limits and surrounding 500-foot buffer (2021 Study Area) hosted suitable habitat for burrowing owls; therefore Step 2, locating Burrows and Burrowing Owl was performed. The focused burrow survey and first of the four focused burrowing owl surveys were conducted on July 8, 2021.

A burrowing owl habitat assessment (Step 1) for the additional parcel was performed on March 18, 2022 by VCS biologists Molly Burdick-Whipp and Sierra Valladares. It was immediately determined that the additional parcel and surrounding 500-foot buffer (2022 Study Area) hosted suitable habitat for burrowing owls; therefore Step 2, locating Burrows and Burrowing Owl was performed. The focused burrow survey and first of the four focused burrowing owl surveys were conducted on March 18, 2022.

The focused burrow and focused burrowing owl surveys (Step 2, Parts A and B) for both sets of surveys involved walking through the 2021/2022 Study Areas depicted on Figure 2. For both sets of surveys, the first survey which included both the focused burrow survey and first of the focused burrowing owl surveys included the entire Study Area. The remaining three focused

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 4 of 9 ends

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Regulatory, Biological & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 vcsenvironmental.com
burrowing owl surveys were conducted within the areas where suitable habitat and burrows were identified during the first surveys; this generally included the entire Project site. The field methodology employed for the focused burrow and focused burrowing owl surveys was essentially the same. The pedestrian survey transects were spaced an appropriate distance apart to allow 100 percent visual coverage of the ground surface (approximately 10 to 15 meters [30 to 50 feet]; adjusted for specific field conditions including vegetation and topography). The biologists paid special attention to those habitat areas that appeared to provide suitable habitat for BUOW. Soil conditions, topography, vegetative communities, and habitat quality were documented. Accessible areas that contained suitable BUOW habitat were surveyed on foot.

Areas not walked were either unsuitable habitat for BUOW or inaccessible (legal access limitations). Legally accessible areas included public right of ways and other private/public areas.

The inaccessible areas that contained suitable BUOW habitat included areas within the 500-foot buffer, which were viewed through binoculars.

All encountered burrows or structure entrances were checked for the presence of BUOWs, molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, tracks, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance. Natural or man‐made structures and debris piles that could support BUOWs were also surveyed. All burrows were monitored at a short distance from the entrance, and at a location that would not interfere with owl behavior. All the burrow and burrow surrogate locations were recorded using GPS technology. The surveys were not conducted during rain, high winds (> 20 miles per hour), dense fog, or temperatures above 90-degree Fahrenheit (°F).

The methods used to detect and identify BUOW included observation of key signs identified by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC) such as sight, scat, tracks, burrows, nests, and calls. All wildlife species encountered visually or audibly during the field survey were identified and recorded in field notes. Binoculars were used to aid in the identification of observed wildlife.

Prior to the field surveys, available literature and databases including the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) were reviewed, to identify sensitive habitats and special status wildlife species, specifically burrowing owl observations in the vicinity of the Study Area.

Results
The surveys for the original Project limits and the additional parcel were conducted over a series of eight field visits by VCS biologists, as noted in Table 1 and Table 2 below. The surveys on July 8 and March 18 included the initial habitat assessments, the focused burrow surveys, and the first of the four focused burrowing owl surveys.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 5 of 9 ends

Survey
No. Survey Date Time
Temperature
High and
Low
(Fahrenheit)
Conditions Personnel
Burrowing
Owl
Detected

1 July 8, 2021 0600 – 0930 65 - 81
Clear skies,
sunny, no
wind

CM & MBW

2 July 22, 2021 0615 – 0845 72 - 79
Clear skies,
sunny, no
wind

MBW & SV

3 August 6, 2021 0615 – 0930 80 - 85
Clear skies,
sunny, no
wind

MBW & MK

4 August 19,
2021
0630 – 0900 70 - 75
Partly
cloudy,
humid, no
wind

WC & CJ

No
CM = Carla Marriner; MBW = Molly Burdick-Whipp; WC = Wade Caffrey; SV = Sierra Valladares; MK = Max Ketabi; CJ = CJ Fotheringham.

Table 2. Survey Data for the BUOW Focused Surveys Conducted for the Additional Parcel

Survey
No. Survey Date Time
Temperature
High and
Low
(Fahrenheit)
Conditions Personnel
Burrowing
Owl
Detected

1 March 18, 2022 0730 – 0930 51 - 61
Clear skies,
sunny, 0-2
mph wind

MBW & SV

2 March 23, 2022 0645 – 0800 55 - 57
Clear skies,
sunny, 3
mph wind

MBW, SV,
NM

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 6 of 9 ends

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Regulatory, Biological & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 vcsenvironmental.com

3 April 6, 2022 0645 – 0800 56 - 61
Clear skies,
sunny, no
wind

MBW, SV,
NM

4 April 13, 2022 0630 – 0900 41 - 43
Clear skies,
sunny, no
wind

MBW, SV,
NM

No
MBW = Molly Burdick-Whipp; SV = Sierra Valladares; NM = Nathalie Munoz The surveys were conducted in compliance with MSHCP protocol’s suggested time frame of 1 hour before sunrise and two hours after sunrise and were conducted during weather conditions that were conducive for observing burrowing owls outside of their burrows (not during rain, high winds or hot temperatures as required by the instructions). Additionally, the last three surveys for each set of surveys were conducted such that the areas where potential BUOW burrows were observed (i.e., suitably sized burrows or cavities) were surveyed earliest in the day to provide for the highest probability of BUOW observation, if present.

The results of the surveys are detailed below.

Results – Habitat/Vegetation
The 2021 Study Area for the original Project limits includes large areas of disturbed land vegetated with annual non-native and/or ruderal plants. Some portions of the 2021 Study Area are developed. The project site is classified as Annual grassland, highly disturbed and recently disked. Soils in the Project site include loamy find sand, gravelly substratum and silt loam.

Disturbed areas within the project site were dominated by invasive/non-native grasses and weedy native annual species with some non-native Mexican fan palm trees (Washingtonia robusta), tamarisk (Tamarix sp.), and ornamental trees including pearl wattle (Acacia podalyriifolia) present at low cover. The common plant species observed on the project site included non-native species such as barley (Hordeum sp.), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), redstemmed filaree (Erodium cicutarium), stinknet (Oncosiphon piluliferum), nettle leaf goosefoot (Chenopodium murale), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), London rocket (Sisymbrium irio) and Jimson weed (Datura wrightii). Some patches of native species such as common fiddleneck (Amsinckia intermedia), Mexican lovegrass (Eragrostis mexicana), salt grass (Distichlis spicata) and alkali heliotrope (Heliotropium curassavicum) were also observed within the project site.

The surrounding 500-foot buffer includes similar habitat/land cover types as the Project limits, comprised of largely disturbed and/or developed areas including a middle school and roads.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 7 of 9 ends

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Regulatory, Biological & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 vcsenvironmental.com
The 2022 Study Area for the additional parcel contains disturbed land vegetated with annual nonnative and/or ruderal plants similar to the original Project limits. The majority of the additional parcel is dominated by non-native plants including red brome (Bromus rubens), ripgut brome, and shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana). The western portion of the additional parcel contains scattered piles of trash and debris and old RV trailers. Shortpod mustard and red brome are found in low cover in this area. Two tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) trees are also found in this section of the additional parcel.

Photographs taken to document existing conditions within both the 2021/2022 Study Areas are attached as Exhibit A.

Results – Wildlife
During the field surveys, there were generally low levels of bird and other wildlife activity. The following wildlife were observed/detected:
• American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos)
• black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans)
• Cassin’s kingbird (Tyrannus vociferans)
• Eurasian collared-dove (Streptopelia decaocto)
• European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)
• house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus)
• house sparrow (Passer domesticus)
• killdeer (Charadrius vociferous)
• lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria)
• mourning dove (Zenaida macroura)
• northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos)
• lazuli bunting (Passerina amoena)
• ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi)
• red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis)
• rock pigeon (Columba livia)
• Say’s phoebe (Sayornis saya)
• Savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis)
• White-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys)

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 8 of 9 ends

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Regulatory, Biological & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 vcsenvironmental.com
Results – BUOW
No BUOW or active signs thereof were observed during the eight focused surveys within the 2021/2022 Study Areas. Suitable burrows and burrow surrogates were observed within the 2021/2022 Study Areas during the surveys. The burrows/burrow surrogates depicted on Figure 2, within the 2021/2022 Study Areas, are considered potentially suitable for burrowing owls.

However, no burrowing owls, or signs of burrowing owl were observed during the surveys.

Conclusion
Based on the lack of direct observation of BUOW or evidence of BUOW activity (e.g., active burrows, whitewash, pellets, etc.) during the surveys, the 2021/2022 Study Areas were not considered to be occupied by BUOW. However, the 2021/2022 Study Areas includes burrows suitable for burrowing owl and suitable burrowing owl foraging habitat; therefore, although burrowing owls were not found, a pre-construction survey will need to be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls in compliance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the MSHCP (County of Riverside 2006). If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (949) 466-9714.

CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Date: May 5, 2022
Signed:

Sierra Valladares (Project Manager / Biologist)
Enclosures
Figure 1 Regional Site Location Map
Figure 2 Aerial – Burrowing Owl Study Area
Figure 3 Site Plan
Figure 4 USGS Map
Figure 5 MSHCP Survey Areas
Exhibit A Site Photographs

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) May 5, 2022

Page 9 of 9 ends

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Regulatory, Biological & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 vcsenvironmental.com
References
Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside MSHCP. County of Riverside, Environmental Programs Department. March 29, 2006.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Dated March 7, 2012.

CDFW. 2021. RareFind, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). State of California, The Natural Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biogeographic Data Branch, California Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento, CA.

National Geographic Society. 2011. Field Guide to the Birds of North America, 6th Ed. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). June 2003. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). http://rctlma.org/Portals/0/mshcp/volume1/index.html
RCA. 2021. MSHCP Information Tool. Accessed July 2, 2021, at https://www.wrcrca.org/rcamaps/

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ^_
²
San Jacinto
Residential
Development
- TTM 38202
1:250,000
0 10,000 20,000
Feet
Map Date: April 2022
Data Sources: ESRI,
BAWCE
Figure 1
Regional/
Site Location
Map
Service Layer Credits:

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT
P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI,
Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
(c) OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User
Project Location

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) #0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0#0#0#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0#0#0#0
#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0 #0#0#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0
²
San Jacinto
Residential
Development
- TTM 38202
1:4,500
0 200 400
Feet
Aerial - BUOW
Study Area
Map Date: May 2022
Data Sources: ESRI,
BAWCE
Figure 2
Project Footprint
Offsite Improvements
2021 Project Site
2021 Study Area
2022 Study Area
Additional Parcel Boundary
#0 Burrows #0 Burrow Surrogates
Service Layer Credits: Source:

Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar
Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID,
IGN, and the GIS User
Community
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ²
San Jacinto
Residential
Development
- TTM 38202
1:3,000
0 150 300
Feet
Site Plan
Map Date: April 2022
Data Sources: ESRI,
BAWCE
Figure 3
Project Footprint
Project Site
Offsite Improvements
Site Plans
Service Layer Credits: Source:

Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar
Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID,
IGN, and the GIS User
Community
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Lakeview San Jacinto
²
San Jacinto
Residential
Development
- TTM 38202
1:24,000
0 1,200 2,400
Feet
USGS
Topographic
Map
Map Date: April 2022
Data Sources: ESRI,
BAWCE
Figure 4
Project Footprint

7.5-minute Quadrangle
Service Layer Credits:

7.5-min Quadrangle: San Jacinto
Section: 28
Township: T4S
Range: R1W
Meridian: San Bernardino
State: California
County: Riverside

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ²
San Jacinto
Residential
Development
- TTM 38202
1:10,000
0 500 1,000
Feet
MSHCP
Information
Map
Map Date: April 2022
Data Sources: ESRI,

BAWCE, RCA
Information Map
Figure 5
Project Footprint
Narrow Endemic Plants
Burrowing Owl Survey Area
Habitat Management Unit: San Jacinto
MSHCP Covered Roads

ARTERIAL
MAJOR

SECONDARY
Service Layer Credits: Source:

Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar
Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID,
IGN, and the GIS User
Community
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

SAN JACINTO PROJECT - BURROWING OWL FOCUSED SURVEYS

EXHIBIT A

July/August 2021 Focused Surveys Conducted for the Original Project Limits Photo 1. Typical view of the 2021 Study Area showing maintained non-native grassland across a majority of the site, viewing southwest. Photo date: July 8, 2021.

Photo 2. View of a new school site located immediately north of the Project site (and within the northwestern portions of the 2021 Study Area), viewing west. Photo date: July 8, 2021.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

SAN JACINTO PROJECT - BURROWING OWL FOCUSED SURVEYS

EXHIBIT A

Photo 3. View of earthen channel feature within the northeastern portion of the 2021 Study Area, viewing north. Photo date: July 22, 2021.

Photo 4. View of the western portion of the 2021 Study Area, with existing residences located within the southern portion of the study area shown in the background, viewing south. Photo date: August 9, 2021.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

SAN JACINTO PROJECT - BURROWING OWL FOCUSED SURVEYS

EXHIBIT A

Photo 5. View of the western portion of the 2021 Study Area showing maintained non-native vegetation, viewing west. Photo date: July 8, 2021.

Photo 6. Representative photo of a suitable burrow observed within the 2021 Study Area with no signs of burrowing owl occupation. Photo date: July 8, 2021.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

SAN JACINTO PROJECT - BURROWING OWL FOCUSED SURVEYS

EXHIBIT A

March/April 2022 Focused Surveys Conducted for the Additional Parcel Photo 7. View of the northern portion of the additional parcel (2022 Study Area) with typical vegetation, viewing north. Photo date: March 18, 2022.

Photo 8. View of the central portion of the 2022 Study Area, viewing south. Photo date: March 18, 2022.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

SAN JACINTO PROJECT - BURROWING OWL FOCUSED SURVEYS

EXHIBIT A

Photo 9. View of the eastern portion of the 2022 Study Area from the northern boundary. The wire fence separates the original project limits to the right and the additional parcel to the left, viewing south. Photo date: March 18, 2022.

Photo 10. View of the western section of the 2022 Study Area with the original project limits in the background, viewing north. Photo date: March 18, 2022.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

SAN JACINTO PROJECT - BURROWING OWL FOCUSED SURVEYS

EXHIBIT A

Photo 11. View of the western portion of the 2022 Study Area from the southern boundary, viewing north.

Photo date: March 18, 2022.

Photo 12. Representative photo of a suitable burrow observed within the 2022 Study Area with no signs of burrowing owl occupation. Photo date: March 18, 2022.

4.1.m
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Appendix B - Biological Technical Report (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
San Jacinto Residential
Development Project, TTM38202
City of San Jacinto, California
PREPARED FOR:

Richland Communities
23986 Aliso Creek Road #711
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Contact: William Inghram
PREPARED BY:
30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100
San Juan Capistrano, California 92675
Contact: Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA
Director, Cultural Services
April 2022

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 i Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Management Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1

1.0 Undertaking Information/Introduction ........................................................................................... 6

1.1 Contracting Data........................................................................................................6

1.2 Undertaking...............................................................................................................6

1.3 Project Site.................................................................................................................6

1.4 Project Personnel .......................................................................................................6

2.0 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 California Environmental Quality Act ...........................................................................7

2.2 Assembly Bill (AB) 52 ..................................................................................................8

2.3 San Jacinto General Plan ............................................................................................9

2.4 Human Remains.......................................................................................................10

3.0 Settings .......................................................................................................................................... 12

3.1 Natural ....................................................................................................................12

3.2 Cultural....................................................................................................................12

3.2.1 Prehistory ......................................................................................12

3.2.2 Ethnography ..................................................................................13

3.2.3 History...........................................................................................17

4.0 Methods ......................................................................................................................................... 20

4.1 Cultural Resources Records Search ...........................................................................20

4.2 Paleontological Resources Records Search ................................................................20

4.3 Historic Aerial Review ...............................................................................................20

4.4 Native American Scoping .........................................................................................20

4.5 Field Survey .............................................................................................................20

5.0 Results ............................................................................................................................................ 21

5.1 Cultural Resources Records Search ...........................................................................21

5.1.1 Studies ..........................................................................................21

5.1.2 Resources ......................................................................................21

5.2 Paleontological Resources Records Search ................................................................21

5.3 Historic Aerial Review ...............................................................................................22

5.4 Native American Scoping .........................................................................................22

5.5 Field Survey .............................................................................................................22

6.0 Management Considerations ....................................................................................................... 24

7.0 Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................................ 25

7.1 Mitigation Measures.................................................................................................25

8.0 Certification .................................................................................................................................... 28

9.0 References ..................................................................................................................................... 29

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development
Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 ii Table of Contents

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 iii Table of Contents

LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1 Cultural Resources Studies Within the Project Site ................................................................. 20

LIST OF FIGURES
Follows Page
1 Project Site..........................................................................................................................6 2 Project Site Aerial.................................................................................................................6

ATTACHMENTS
A Cultural Resources Records Search (EIC)
B Paleontological Records Search (WSC)
C Native American Scoping (NAHC)
D Personnel Qualifications

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
National Archaeological Database (NADB) Information Sheet Cultural Resources Assessment for the
San Jacinto Residential Development Project, TTM 38202
San Jacinto, California
by
Patrick Maxon, M.A., RPA
April 2022
Submitted by:

Patrick Maxon M.A., RPA
VCS Environmental
30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100
San Juan Capistrano, California 92675
T: (949) 489-2700
Submitted to:

William Inghram
Richland Communities
23986 Aliso Creek Road #711
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
USGS San Jacinto, CA 7.5-Minute Quadrangle in Township 4 South; Range 1 West, Section 28 (S.B.B.M).

Project site: 33.8 acres; 1.26 acres offsite; 35.06 acres total Key Words: EIC, WSC, NAHC, P-33-021063

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 1 Management Summary

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Purpose and Scope
VCS Environmental (VCS) undertook this study under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for the proposed San Jacinto Residential Development Project (Project) in the City of San Jacinto. This cultural resources investigation will meet CEQA and the City of San Jacinto’s requirement for cultural resources for its Project application package. This Phase I Cultural Resources Study was designed to identify cultural resources that may be present on the Project site and to provide management recommendations.

The format of this report follows Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format (Office of Historic Preservation 1990).

Dates of Investigation
A cultural resources literature review was completed by staff at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California, Riverside on August 24, 2021 (Attachment A). A paleontological resources literature review was completed by Darla Radford at the Western Science Center (WSC) on June 24, 2021 (Attachment B). A Sacred Lands File search was received from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on March 7, 2022 (Attachment C). A cultural resources survey of the property was conducted by VCS Director of Cultural Services, Patrick Maxon, RPA and Brian Kussman on December 17, 2021 and March 2, 2022. This report was completed in April 2022.

Investigation Constraints
The Project site is free of any structures and was recently disked and cleared of vegetation during routine weed abatement and maintenance. Approximately 95% of the ground surface is visible.

Findings of the Investigation
Implementation of the proposed Project would not adversely affect any known significant historical resources. The area, however, is known to contain historical resources. Mitigation measures are recommended:
• The EIC records search identified 32 cultural resources recorded within one-half mile of the Project site. One of the resources (P-33-021063) is within the Project site. It has previously been removed from the property.
• As many as 36 cultural resources studies have previously been completed within one-half mile of the Project site. None of the studies include the current Project site. • The NAHC Sacred Lands File search was negative.
• The field survey was negative.

Management Considerations
Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines contains the Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, which includes, for Section V. Cultural Resources, questions relating to cultural resources, including the historic

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 2 Management Summary
built environment, historic and prehistoric archaeology, and human remains, and a paleontological question included in Section VII, Geology and Soils.

The issues presented in the Initial Study Checklist have been used as significance criteria. Accordingly, a project may result in a significant environmental impact if:
• The Project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5.
• The Project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5.
• The Project would disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.

Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines Section VII, Geology and Soils, includes an additional question related to the presence or absence of fossil resources on the Project site. Accordingly, a project may result in a significant environmental impact if:
• The Project would directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature.

Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines Section XVII, Tribal Cultural Resources, includes additional questions related to the presence or absence of Tribal Cultural Resources on the Project site. They are as follows:
• Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

The purpose of the cultural resources assessment is to identify any historical/cultural resources that may exist on the Project site, to determine the sensitivity of the Project site for the presence of buried archaeological material, and to make recommendations to the lead agency regarding the development of mitigation measures to reduce the impacts of the Project on resources to a less than significant level.

Public Resources Code (PRC) §21084.1-2 and PRC §5020.1(q) of CEQA states that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change (i.e., demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired) in the significance of a “historical resource” or a “tribal cultural resource” is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.

Summary and Recommendations

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 3 Management Summary
An examination of historic aerial photographs (NETRONLINE n.d.) revealed that the Project site was formerly developed with a ranch. The entire Project site was razed and disked beginning around 2005.

Thirty-two cultural resources are recorded within one-half mile of the Project site. One resource (P-33- 14710) is a basin metate, attesting to the prehistoric presence of indigenous populations in the vicinity.

The sediment underlying the project area is mapped entirely as Holocene alluvium; however, the nearby Diamond Valley Lake Project localities are also mapped in Holocene alluvial and has produced significant fossil specimens associated with the Pleistocene. The paleontology will be addressed in a separate study (Kussman 2022).

Implementation of the proposed Project would not adversely affect any existing known cultural resources.

However, because the area is known to contain resources, archaeological monitoring is recommended during ground disturbing activities.

Mitigation Measures

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Based on the data presented, it is recommended that archaeological monitoring and Native American monitoring (if applicable) occur during Project excavations into younger Holocene alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. These Mitigation Measures for the project, outline the monitoring protocols.

A MMRP to mitigate potential impacts to undiscovered buried cultural resources within the Project shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the lead agency. This program shall include, but not be limited to, the following actions:
1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written verification that a certified archaeologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program. This verification shall be presented in a letter from the project archaeologist to the lead agency. 2) The project applicant shall provide Native American monitoring during grading if the lead agency determines it is necessary pending results of the AB52 Consultation process. If applicable, the Native American monitor shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. The Lead Agency shall coordinate with the consulting Tribe(s) to facilitate communications with the Project developer/applicant so that all Parties can develop a mutually-acceptable Tribal Monitoring and Treatment Agreement which includes the scope of monitoring, scheduling of monitors from individual consulting Tribe(s), and the course of action for inadvertent discoveries.
3) The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s) if applicable pending results of the AB 52 Consultation, the contractor, and the City, shall implement a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
b. The Project archeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 4 Management Summary
include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols.
c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological and Tribal monitors (if applicable) shall be on-site, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. Monitoring is recommended in younger Holocene alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated.
5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed.
6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operation in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the lead agency at the time of discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The lead agency must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program to mitigate impacts shall be implemented by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the lead agency before being carried out using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the county coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the NAHC) shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. a. Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered, and features recorded using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s) shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis. b. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be used in the event of a discovery:
i. Preservation-in-Place. Avoidance, or preservation-in-place, involves leaving a resource where it was found with no development affecting its integrity. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and cultural resources.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 5 Management Summary
ii. Reburial on the Project site in an area not subject to future disturbance. Reburial of a resource shall include provisions to protect the selected reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all required cataloging and basic recording have been completed, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. The listing of contents and the location of the reburial shall be included in a confidential Phase IV monitoring report. c. If Preservation-in-Place or reburial is not feasible, all cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards in a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources (OHP 1993). The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title and accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation.
7) A Phase IV Monitoring Report, documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context, shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the lead agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include DPR Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. The Phase IV report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the consulting Tribe(s).

Disposition of Data
This report will be filed with the City of San Jacinto, Richland Communities, VCS, and at the EIC. All field notes and other documentation related to the study are on file at VCS, San Juan Capistrano.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 6 Undertaking Information/Introduction

1.0 UNDERTAKING INFORMATION/INTRODUCTION

1.1 Contracting Data
Richland Communities retained VCS Environmental (VCS) to conduct a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the proposed San Jacinto Residential Development Project. This report details the findings of the investigation and offers management recommendations and mitigation measures to evaluate any discoveries and to reduce the impact of the Project on resources to a less than significant level.

1.2 Undertaking
The proposed Project would develop an approximately 33.8-acre vacant site with up to 181 single-family residential homes and associated infrastructure. The Project requires subdividing five (5) existing parcels (APNs 436-280-011, 436-280-012, 436-280-013, 436-280-014 and 436-280-025). Offsite improvements include connecting the proposed internal circulation system to the intersections of Lyon Avenue/Appaloosa Drive and Marilyn Drive/Estrella Street; connecting to existing utility systems within Lyon Avenue; frontage improvements along Lyon Avenue including a Class I multi-use path (per City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan), sidewalk and street lights; and constructing a portion of the San Jacinto Valley Master Drainage Plan storm drain system Line G-3 from Marilyn Drive/Estrella Street along the northeast edge of the development to a future connection point (note: continuation of Line G-3 to be constructed by others) at the Monte Vista Middle School property to the north.

1.3 Project Site
The Project site is located east of N. Lyon Avenue, west of Marilyn Drive, north of a residential ranch development, and immediately south of Monte Vista Middle School in San Jacinto, Riverside County. Figure 1 depicts the regional and specific location of the Project site on a portion of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS’) San Jacinto 7.5-minute quadrangles, in Section 9 of Township 3 South; Range 3 West (S.B.B.M).

Figure 2 depicts the Project site and offsite improvements in an aerial photograph.

1.4 Project Personnel
Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA requested the literature review at the EIC, contacted the NAHC, and authored this report. Mr. Maxon and Brian Kussman completed the field survey. Refer to Attachment D for qualifications.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Lakeview San Jacinto
²
San Jacinto
Residential
Development
- TTM 38202
1:24,000
0 1,200 2,400
Feet
USGS
Topographic
Map
Map Date: April 2022
Data Sources: ESRI,
BAWCE
Figure 1
Project Footprint

7.5-minute Quadrangle
Service Layer Credits:

7.5-min Quadrangle: San Jacinto
Section: 28
Township: T4S
Range: R1W
Meridian: San Bernardino
State: California
County: Riverside

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 ²
SanJacinto
Residential
Development
-TTM38202
1:3,000
0150300
Feet
Project
AerialMap
MapDate:April2022
DataSources:ESRI,
BAWCE
Figure2
ProjectFootprint
ProjectSite
OffsiteImprovements
SitePlans
ServiceLayerCredits:Source:

Esri,Maxar,GeoEye,Earthstar
Geographics,CNES/Airbus
DS,USDA,USGS,AeroGRID,
IGN,andtheGISUser
Community
Esri,HERE,Garmin,(c)
OpenStreetMapcontributors

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 7 Regulatory Setting

2.0 REGULATORY SETTING
This section contains a discussion of the applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards that govern cultural resources and must be adhered to both prior to and during Project implementation. The report is intended to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations (14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] §15064.5 and California Public Resources Code [PRC] §21083.2). It is assumed that there is no federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and thus no cultural resources analysis is required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 United States Code [USC] 470f) and its implementing regulations at 36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 800, Protection of Historic Properties).

2.1 California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a project would have a significant effect on one or more historical resources. According to Section 15064.5(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a “historical resource” is defined as a resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (PRC §21084.1); a resource included in a local register of historical resources (14 California Code of Regulations [CCR], §15064.5[a][2]); or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant (14 CCR §15064.5[a][3]).

Public Resources Code (PRC) §5024.1, Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR), and Sections 21080.3.1, 21083.2, and 21084.1 of the CEQA Statutes were used as the basic guidelines for the cultural resources study. PRC 5024.1 requires evaluation of historical resources to determine their eligibility for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). The purposes of the CRHR are to maintain listings of the State’s historical resources and to indicate which properties are to be protected from substantial adverse change. The criteria for listing resources in the CRHR, which were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) (per the criteria listed at 36 CFR §60.4), are listed below.

The quality of significance in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California is present in any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association and that:
(a) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; or
(b) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; or (c) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or
(d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

According to Public Resources Code 5024.1 and described further in Section 15064.5(a)(3)(A–D) of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR), a resource is considered historically significant if it meets the criteria for listing in the NRHP (per the criteria listed at 36 CFR 60.4). Impacts that affect those characteristics of the resource that qualify it for the NRHP or that would adversely alter the significance of a resource listed in or eligible for listing in the CRHR are considered to have a significant effect on the environment. Impacts to cultural resources from the proposed Project are thus considered significant if the Project: (1) physically

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 8 Regulatory Setting
destroys or damages all or part of a resource; (2) changes the character of the use of the resource or physical feature within the setting of the resource that contributes to its significance; or (3) introduces visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that diminish the integrity of significant features of the resource.

The purpose of a cultural resources investigation is to evaluate whether any cultural resources remain exposed on the surface of the Project site or whether any cultural resources can reasonably be expected to exist in the subsurface. If resources are discovered, management recommendations would be required for evaluation of the resources for CRHR eligibility.

Broad mitigation guidelines for treating historical resources are codified in Section 15126.4(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. To the extent feasible, public agencies should seek to avoid significant effects to historical resources, with preservation in place being the preferred alternative. If not feasible, a data recovery plan shall be prepared to guide subsequent excavation. Mitigation for historical resources such as buildings, bridges, and other structures that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Weeks and Grimmer 1995) will generally be considered mitigated below a level of significance.

2.2 Assembly Bill (AB) 52
This Project is subject to the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (PRC §21080.3.1). AB52 is applicable to projects that have filed a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), or notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Negative Declaration (ND) on or after July 1, 2015. The law requires lead agencies to initiate consultation with California Native American Tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the Project and have requested such consultation, prior to determining the type of CEQA documentation that is applicable to the Project (i.e., EIR, MND, ND). Significant impacts to “tribal cultural resources” are considered significant impacts to the environment.

For “tribal cultural resources,” PRC §21074, enacted and codified as part of a 2014 amendment to CEQA through Assembly Bill 52, provides the statutory definition as follows:
“Tribal cultural resources” are either of the following:

1. Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following:

A. Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources.

B. Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1.

2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

To determine if such resources exist, under AB 52 lead agencies must consult with tribes that request consultation and must make a reasonable and good faith effort to mitigate the impacts of a development on such resources to a less than significant level. AB 52 allows tribes 30 days after receiving notification to request consultation and the lead agency must initiate consultation within 30 days of the request by tribes.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 9 Regulatory Setting

2.3 San Jacinto General Plan
The Resource Management Element of the City of San Jacinto General Plan, whose focus is the protection and enhancement of natural [and cultural] resources to ensure a high-quality living environment for years to come, includes the following Cultural Resources section (partial):

San Jacinto’s rich history has left the City with a great number of significant prehistoric and historic archaeological resources. These resources help define the community and offer opportunities for cultural, educational, and community enrichment. The City encourages the protection and enhancement of these resources for generations to come.

Resource Management Goal 4: Promote cultural awareness through the preservation of the City’s historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources.

Policy 4.1: Wherever possible, identify, protect and preserve the historical resources of the City.

Policy 4.2: Encourage historic preservation in the downtown core.

Policy 4.3: Increase public awareness of and accessibility to the City’s cultural heritage and resources through educational visitor-oriented programs.

Policy 4.4: Ensure new development is compatible with and complementary to adjacent historic resources.

The Implementation Program in the General Plan Appendix provides actions, procedures, and techniques that serves to implement the Resource Management Goals. RM-16 is the Cultural Resources section.

Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). a. For structures that potentially have historic significance, the City shall require that a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or historian to determine the actual significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The City may require modification of the project and/or mitigation measures to avoid any impact to a historic structure, when feasible, such as retaining or rehabilitating historic buildings pursuant to City of San Jacinto guidelines. If a historic building cannot be avoided by a project associated with the proposed General Plan, the significant historic building may be relocated to avoid impacting the structure.
b. For all development proposals within areas with the potential to contain prehistoric/historic resources, the City shall require a study to be conducted by a professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts. Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.
c. The City shall require an assessment of the potential for development proposals to significantly impact paleontological resources pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.

If the project involves earthworks, the City may require a study conducted by a professional

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 10 Regulatory Setting
paleontologist to determine if paleontological assets are present, and if the project will significantly impact the resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid impacting the paleontological materials, require monitoring of rock units with high potential to contain significant nonrenewable paleontological resources, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts, such as recovering the paleontological resources for preservation.
d. The City shall make provisions for archaeological resources accidentally discovered during construction, or when the City does not have approval authority over the project, encourage the lead agency to make such provisions. These provisions shall include an immediate evaluation of the find and contingency funding and time allotment sufficient to allow for the recovery of the archaeological resource or implement measures to avoid disturbing the resource if the archaeological resource is determined to be unique.
e. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code section 5097.98, or the Native American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the Commission.
f. Prior to adopting any general plan, specific plan, or any amendment thereto, the City shall notify appropriate tribes of the opportunity for consultation for the purpose of preserving, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places located on land within the City’s jurisdiction that may be affected by the proposed plan or amendment.
g. Prior to the adoption or substantial amendment of a general plan or specific plan, the City shall refer the proposed action to those tribes that are on the NAHC contact list and have traditional lands located within the City’s jurisdiction for a 45 day comment period. In addition, at least 10 days prior to a public hearing, the City shall send notice to tribes that have filed a written request for such notice.
h. Prior to designating open space, the City shall consult with tribes if the affected land contains a cultural place and if the affected tribe has requested public notice under Government Code section 65092.

2.4 Human Remains
Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provides for the disposition of accidentally discovered human remains. Section 7050.5 states that, if human remains are found, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 11 Regulatory Setting
Section 5097.98 of the PRC states that, if remains are determined by the Coroner to be of Native American origin, the Coroner must notify the NAHC within 24 hours which, in turn, must identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendants shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 12 Setting

3.0 SETTINGS

3.1 Natural
The Project site is surrounded by residential development, with rural residential homes to the south. It has previously been used has a horse ranch and heavily disturbed. The Project Footprint supports a vegetation community/land cover type which includes herbaceous non-native forbs and grasses and ornamental palms. The topography throughout the Project Footprint is generally flat. Elevations on the Project Footprint range from 1,505– 1,510 feet (~458 – 460 meters) above mean sea level (MSL).

3.2 Cultural

3.2.1 Prehistory
The prehistory of western Riverside County can be understood as the transition area between coastal and desert subsistence patterns. Earlier studies (Kroeber 1925, Moratto 1984, Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984, et al.) were comprehensive and statewide; however, they were published before and when California’s contract archaeology was in its infancy and considerable archaeology has been completed in the area since that time. Progress has also been made in addressing the regional research questions posed by earlier researchers. The following chronology, based on that of Erlandson and Colton (1991) is presented in Jones and Klar (2007) - a recent reevaluation and generalized chronology of California prehistory. The following is a summary of Chapter 14 of that book (Byrd and Raab 2007). It describes cultural traits in the southern California Bight (extending from Point Conception to the Mexican border), from ocean to desert.

Early Holocene (11,600 – 7,600 BP). California’s first inhabitants have traditionally been thought of as big game hunters who lived at the end of the last ice-age (~11,000 years before present [BP]). As the environment warmed and dried, the large Ice Age fauna vanished, marking the end of the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition (WPLT) characterized by large pluvial (rainfall-fed) lakes, streams, marshes, and grasslands exploited by native populations whose sites are generally found along their shores (Moratto 1984).

Populations responded by exploiting a much wider range of flora and fauna to replace the large mammals.

This traditional model has been tested by the past three decades of archaeological research. Current models suggest a much more complex situation; most dramatically illustrated at coastal sites. The Paleocoastal Tradition (PCT) reflects a coastal adaptation of the WPLT (Davis et al. 1969). PCT sites are also located along bays and estuaries, exploiting mollusks, sea mammals, sea birds, and fish in addition to land plants and animals. Habitation on San Miguel Island has been identified as early as ~11,300 BP at Daisy Cave and ~8,500 BP at Eel Point on San Clemente Island (Byrd and Raab 2007).

Middle Holocene (7,600 – 3,650 BP). The Middle Holocene has been thought of as a time of cultural change where early Holocene cultures morphed over time into the Late Holocene cultures. This “Millingstone Horizon” (Wallace 1955) in coastal southern California suggests a shift in subsistence strategies - to the gathering and processing of plant seeds, grasses and shellfish as the primary dietary staple, with fishing and the hunting of smaller animals playing a less important role. Large habitation sites are seen in inland areas.

Occupation revolved around seasonal and semi-sedentary movements in coastal Orange and San Diego counties. Geographic movement through trade networks are postulated by the presence of Olivella grooved rectangle shell beads as far north as central Oregon dating to 4900- 3500 BP (Byrd and Raab 2007).

Characteristics of the middle Holocene sites include ground stone artifacts (manos and metates) used for processing plant material and shellfish, flexed burial beneath rock or milling stone cairns, flaked core or cobble tools, dart points, cogstones, discoidals, and crescentics.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 13 Setting
Late Holocene (3,650 – 233 BP). Traditional models of this period maintained that the cultural systems encountered by European explorers in the late 18th century were formed during this time. These cultures were said to have access to rich resources (particularly the acorn), invented the bow and arrow, the mortar and pestle, introduced ceramics, and altered mortuary behaviors from inhumations to cremations. These groups were often elevated to utopian levels by earlier researchers (Raab and Jones 2004).

This period is now recognized to have been one of more complex local and regional patterns of change that occurred at differing times within the region. Byrd and Raab (2007) suggest that cultures in southern California over-exploited high-ranked food items such as shellfish, fish, terrestrial and marine mammals, and plant remains. This, and climatic fluctuations, led to resource depression, which necessitated a shift to less desirable, more costly resources.

The “Takic Wedge” migration of Takic speakers from the Great Basin into southern California appears to have occurred early in this period. It should be noted that many Tribal creation stories assert that native peoples were always in this area and no migration actually occurred.

3.2.2 Ethnography

CAHUILLA
According to maps prepared in Bean (1978:576) and Bean and Shipek (1978:551), the Project area is located within traditional territory of the Cahuilla, northeast of the Luiseño and due east of the Gabrielino; however, this area was likely occupied or at least visited by all three tribes.

The Cahuilla are an ethnographic Native American group descended from Late Prehistoric Takic-speaking inhabitants of the region. The name Cahuilla is believed to have originated from the group’s word káwiya for “master” or “boss” (Bean 1978:575).

The territory of the Cahuilla has been described as topographically diverse, “from the summit of the San Bernardino Mountains in the north to Borrego Springs and the Chocolate Mountains in the south, a portion of the Colorado Desert west of Orocopia Mountain to the east, and the San Jacinto Plain near Riverside and the eastern slopes of Palomar Mountain to the west” (Bean 1978:575). Three main divisions of the Cahuilla—Desert, Pass (or Western), and Mountain groups—were defined mainly by geographic distribution, but dialectic differentiation was apparent (Strong 1929). A network of trails linking Cahuilla villages and those of neighboring groups, including the Luiseño, facilitated trade and maintenance of social ties.

The Cahuilla were hunter-gatherers who followed a seasonal round of utilizing various floral and faunal resources occurring in their territory (Bean 1972, 1978; Bean and Saubel 1972). Because Cahuilla territory was comprised of high mountains and arid lowlands, their seasonal round has been characterized as vertical rather than horizontal, with people moving upward and downward in layers of ecological zones ordered by elevation (Bean 1972). Settled villages were located near reliable water sources and within range of various resources (food, wood for fuel, and lithic materials for tools). Each village was composed of a group of individuals that were related by blood or marriage and which retained its own specific hunting and resource collecting areas. Cahuilla lineage groups were linked together in a complex interaction sphere of trade, alliance, intermarriage, and ceremonial exchange with neighboring groups including the Luiseño.

Major villages were fully occupied during winter, but during other seasons task groups headed out in periodic forays to collect available plant foods, with larger groupings from several villages organizing for annual acorn harvests. Bean and Saubel (1972) have recorded several hundred species of plants used by the Cahuilla for food, utilitarian materials, and medicines. Major plant foods emphasized during late

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 14 Setting
prehistory included acorns, mesquite, screwbean, pinyon nuts, and various seed-producing legumes that were complemented by agave, wild fruits and berries, tubers, cactus bulbs, roots, and greens. Hunting was accomplished with the throwing stick and bow and arrow; nets and traps were also used for small animals (Bean 1972). Stone tools consisted of two general types: ground stone tools (e.g., mortars, pestles, manos, and metates for pounding and grinding) and flaked stone tools (e.g., knives, drills, and projectile points for cutting and piercing). Ground stone tools were typically made from granite or other coarse stone. Flaked stone tools were typically made from chert, jasper, basalt, quartz, quartzite, obsidian, and other finegrained stone in which breakage patterns could be controlled and sharp edges would result.

LUISEÑO
The project is located north and east of the ethnographic territory of the Luiseño. The Luiseño are Takic speakers and are descended from Late Prehistoric populations of the region. Takic is part of the larger UtoAztecan language stock which migrated west from the Great Basin (Bean and Smith 1978, Shipley 1978).

The Luiseño name for Lake Elsinore is Paiakhche, (Kroeber 1907:144, 147). The village of Paiakhche is ethnographically documented immediately north of the lake by Kroeber (1925), however, consultation with the Pechanga Tribe shows that the village was located northwest of the Lake and that the correct spelling is Páayaxchi. This name also refers to the Lake itself.

The Luiseño share many similar cultural traits to many other southern California groups. The Luiseño lived in sedentary and independent village groups, each with specific subsistence territories encompassing hunting, food gathering, and fishing areas. Villages were usually located in valley basins, along creeks and streams adjacent to mountain ranges where water was available and where the villages would be protected from environmental conditions and potential enemies. Most inland populations had access to fishing and food gathering sites on the coast (Bean and Shipek 1978).

Luiseño economic and subsistence practices centered upon the seasonal gathering of acorns and seeds; the hunting of deer and small mammals such as rabbits, wood rats, ground squirrels, and birds. Coastal foods included sea mammals, fish and shellfish. Tool technologies were organized around food collection, storage, and preparation strategies, which was reflected in the type, size, and quantity of food items gathered. Stone (lithic) tools included two types: ground stone and flaked stone tools. Ground stone equipment included: mortars, pestles, manos and metate grinding slicks, made from granite, schist, and gneiss. Flaked tools included: bifaces, projectile points, scrapers, and gravers, fabricated from siliceous rock such as chert and jasper, microcrystalline chalcedony, obsidian, fine grain ingenious rocks such as basalt rhyolite, and andesite, and hard silica such as quarts and quartzite. Utilitarian tools were constructed from wood, animal bones, skins, and/or woven from flora materials depending on need (Lovin 1963). Hunting activities were conducted both on an individual basis and/or organized into group activities, depending on seasonal factors and the game hunted. Acorns encompassed as much 50 percent of the Luiseño diet (White 1963). Acorns provided a reliable and abundant food source that was high in calories and could be easily stored for future use. Acorn collection was a central tenant in the lives of the Luiseños and dominated their economic and social structure (Basgall 1987, Johnson and Earle 1987).

Villages were organized around an inherited chief who exerted sole control over the economy, religious rituals, and territorial matters within the village (Bean and Shipek 1978:555). The chief at times would consult with a council of elders and shamans on matters of religious practices and on environmental conditions effecting village life. Large villages may have had a complex behavioral and political structure due to their territorial size and economic control, while the smaller villages’ political complexity was limited by their territorial size (Strong 1929; Bean and Shipek 1978:555).

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 15 Setting
For the Luiseño, Lake Elsinore is an important cosmological center (DuBois 1908). After becoming sick, Wuyóot was taken to the hot springs of Lake Elsinore for their healing qualities. The Luiseño consider Wuyóot a deity in their creation story as he was the first human and a prophet to the Káamalam, the First People (DuBois 1908). The Luiseño also believe that Wuyóot died at the hot springs of Lake Elsinore.

GABRIELINO/TONGVA/KIZH
At the time of European contact in 1769, when Gaspar de Portolá’s expedition crossed the Los Angeles Basin, what were to be named the Gabrielino Native Americans by the Spanish occupied the area to the west of the Project site (Kroeber 1925; Bean and Shipek 1978; Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996).

While the term Gabrielino identifies those Native Americans who were under the control of the Spanish Mission San Gabriel Archángel, the overwhelming number of people in these areas were of the same ethnic nationality and language (Takic) group. Their territory extended from northern Orange County north to the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles County and eastward to the San Bernardino area.

This and the following ethnographic information relate to currently surviving native peoples still living in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties. They maintain their cultural practices and customs. The current Gabrielino Tribe comprises at least five bands that are recognized Tribes by the State of California (they do not, however, enjoy Federal recognition). They include the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation; the Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council; the GabrielenoTongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians; the Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe; and the Gabrielino/Tongva Nation. The terms the Native Americans in Southern California used to identify themselves have, for the most part, been lost; therefore, the names do not necessarily identify specific ethnic or Tribal groups. Some currently refer to themselves as Tongva, while others prefer the term Kizh. For the sake of clarity and consistency, the term Gabrielino will be used for the remainder of this section.

The Gabrielino arrived in the Los Angeles Basin possibly as early as 1,500 BCE as part of the so-called Shoshonean (Takic speaking) Wedge from the Great Basin region (Sutton 2010). The Gabrielino gradually displaced the indigenous peoples, who were probably Hokan speakers. Large, permanent villages were established in the fertile lowlands along rivers and streams and in sheltered areas along the coast.

Eventually, Gabrielino territory encompassed the greater Los Angeles Basin, coastal regions from Topanga Canyon in the north to perhaps as far south as Aliso Creek, and the islands of San Clemente, San Nicholas, and Santa Catalina (Bean and Smith 1978:538–540). Recent studies suggest the population may have numbered as many as 10,000 individuals at their peak in the Precontact Period.

It should be noted that Gabrielino origin stories assert that the union of sky and the earth created the world and everything in it; finally producing Wewyoot or Weywot, the father of all people (McCawley 1996: 172).

This occurred in situ, meaning the people were always here and the Shoshonean Wedge hypothesis is, according to the Gabrielino, false.

Kroeber (1925:621) considered the Gabrielino:
. . . to have been the most advanced group south of Tehachapi, except perhaps the Chumash. They certainly were the wealthiest and most thoughtful of all the Shoshoneans of the State, and dominated these civilizations wherever contacts occurred.

SETTLEMENT
According to Bean and Smith (1978:538), the Gabrielino are, in many ways, one of the least known groups of California’s native inhabitants. In addition to much of the Los Angeles Basin, they occupied the offshore islands of Santa Catalina, San Nicolas, and San Clemente. Gabrielino populations are difficult to reconstruct.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 16 Setting
However, at any one time, as many as 50 to 100 villages were simultaneously occupied. Like the prehistoric culture before them, the Gabrielino were a hunter/gatherer group who lived in small sedentary or semisedentary groups of 50 to 100 persons, termed rancherias. These rancherias were occupied by at least some of the people all of the time. Location of the encampment was determined by water availability.

Houses were circular in form and constructed of sticks covered with thatch or mats. Each village had a sweat lodge as well as a sacred enclosure (Bean and Smith 1978). Although the earliest description of the Gabrielino dates back to the Cabrillo expedition of 1542, the most important and extensive accounts were those written by Father Gerónimo Boscana about 1822 and Hugo Reid in 1852.

SUBSISTENCE
Gabrielino subsistence relied heavily on plant foods, but was supplemented with a variety of meat, especially from marine resources. Food procurement consisted of hunting and fishing by men and gathering of plant foods and shellfish by women. Hunting technology included use of the bow and arrow for deer and smaller game, throwing sticks, snares, traps, and slings. Fishing was conducted with the use of shell fishhooks, bone harpoons, and nets. Seeds were gathered with beaters and baskets. Seeds and other foods were stored in baskets. Seeds were prepared with manos and metates and/or mortars and pestles. Food was cooked in baskets coated with asphaltum, in stone pots, on steatite frying pans, and by roasting in earthen ovens (Bean and Smith 1978).

TRADE
Most trade between settlements was through reciprocity (barter), indicated by strings of Olivella shell beads used as a medium of exchange throughout southern California (Ruby 1970). Gabrielino and Juaneño from the mainland probably traded trade beads, game, and plant foods in exchange for shell beads and steatite, and plant foods from the islanders. Steatite artifacts along with fish, shell money, and animal pelts were traded by the mainlander Gabrielino into the interior for seeds and deer skin. According to Bean and Saubel (1972), the Gabrielino traded with the Serrano and the Cahuilla to the east. The Gabrielino traded goods such as shell beads, dried fish, sea otter pelts, asphaltum, and steatite for goods such as salt, obsidian, deer hides, furs, and acorns. There is evidence of trade between the Arizona Hohokam and the Gabrielino, probably with the Mojave people as middleman (Koerper in Mason et al. 1997). Glycymeris shell bracelets, ceramics, and blankets may have been exchanged for Pacific shells and shell beads (Koerper in Mason et al. 1997).

RELIGION
Aside from shamanistic curing rituals, principal religious activity is related to the Chinigchinich cult that emphasized correct behavior as promulgated by a mythical figure, Chinigchinich. The Chinigchinich religion developed in Gabrielino territory and spread southeast to the Juaneño/Luiseño, Cupeño, and Ipai. It is a cult that is tied into an older creation myth. Chinigchinich is said to give laws and punishment for those who are disobedient in which shamans were given responsibilities to oversee the cult. It was an extensive system of polar opposites (duality) that are united under higher principals (unity) (Applegate 1979). Male-Female dualism found in the creation myth is also present in the origin myth (Applegate 1979). Chinigchinich cult ceremonies included boys’ puberty ceremonies using toloache, a drug made from Jimson Weed (Datura stramonium). During the vision quest, a personal protector or totemic animal was acquired. Such totems could be bear, coyote, crow, or rattlesnake. Other ceremonies were to obtain vengeance on enemies; to express thanks for victory; and to commemorate the dead. The focus of the ceremonies was a circular sacred enclosure found in each village. The emphasis on male rites of passage and war may be a response to the increasing population and resultant competition for territory and access to resources. Or it may be

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 17 Setting
a response to the arrival of the Spanish since the Chinigchinich religion seems to be of recent (not prehistoric) origin.

Both inhumation (burial in a grave) and cremation was practiced. During cremations, the goods of the deceased and his hut were often buried with him. Annual mourning ceremonies were held in the late summer for all who had died during the previous year. Clothes of the deceased and an image of the deceased were often burned at this time. Eagles were sacrificed for recently deceased chiefs (Applegate 1979).

3.2.3 History
In California, the historic era is generally divided into three periods: the Spanish or Mission Period (1769 to 1821), the Mexican or Rancho Period (1821 to 1848), and the American Period (1848 to present). The Spanish Period (1769-1821) is represented by exploration of the region; establishment of the San Diego Presidio and missions at San Gabriel and San Luis Rey; and the introduction of livestock, agricultural goods, and European architecture and construction techniques. Early exploration of the Riverside County area began in 1772 when Lieutenant Pedro Fages (then Military Governor of San Diego) crossed through the San Jacinto Valley. Permanent settlement began about the turn of the century through the issuance of land grants and grazing permits, and Spanish influence continued to some extent after 1821 due to the continued implementation of the mission system.

The Mexican Period (1821-1848) began with Mexican independence from Spain and continued until the end of the Mexican-American War. The Secularization Act resulted in the transfer, through land grants (called ranchos) of large mission tracts to politically prominent individuals. Sixteen ranchos were granted in Riverside County, the first to Juan Bandini in 1838. The Project is located in what was the Rancho La Laguna, also known as Laguna Grande and La Laguna de Temecula. It was confirmed in 1844 in an official land grant to Julian Manriquez by the Mexican governor of California. The rancho consisted of three leagues that included the lakebed and the shoreline (Hampson 1991). At that time, cattle ranching was a more substantial business than agricultural activities, and trade in hides and tallow increased during the early portion of this period. Until the Gold Rush of 1849, livestock and horticulture dominated California’s economy.

The American Period (1848-present) began with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and in 1850, California was accepted into the Union of the United States primarily due to the population increase created by the Gold Rush of 1849. The cattle industry reached its greatest prosperity during the first years of the American Period. Mexican Period land grants had created large pastoral estates in California, and demand for beef during the Gold Rush led to a cattle boom that lasted from 1849–1855. However, beginning about 1855, the demand for beef began to decline due to imports of sheep from New Mexico and cattle from the Mississippi and Missouri Valleys. When the beef market collapsed, many California ranchers lost their ranchos through foreclosure. A series of disastrous floods in 1861–1862, followed by two years of extreme drought, which continued to some extent until 1876, altered ranching forever in the southern California area.

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
This history of the City is adapted from its website (San Jacinto n.d.).

Founded in 1870, and incorporated on April 9, 1888, San Jacinto is one of the County’s oldest communities with roots that stretch back to the earliest days of California.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 18 Setting
The first native people settled in the San Jacinto Valley thousands of years ago. Later, the Serrano and Cahuilla people arrived. Their villages were located along and near streams and springs. They were hunters and gatherers and they subsisted primarily on small game and acorns. The Soboba Indian Reservation, just east of San Jacinto, is now the home to the descendants of some of these people.

The first Spanish explorers entered the San Jacinto Valley in the early 1770s. In 1774, and again in 1775, Col. Juan Bautista de Anza led two expeditions up from Mexico, crossing the Colorado River at Yuma and continuing across the Borrego Desert and up Coyote Canyon. For a few years, the Valley was on the main overland route to California.

Beginning around 1820, the Mission San Luis Rey (located in modern day Oceanside) established a cattle ranch in the Valley, which they named for St. Hyacinth (San Jacinto in Spanish). St. Hyacinth ministered in Eastern Europe in the early 13th century; he was canonized in 1594 and his feast day is August 17th. Locally, the name San Jacinto was soon applied to the San Jacinto River and Mt. San Jacinto (elevation 10,804 ft.), one of the three tallest peaks in southern California.

In 1834, after California had passed from Spanish to Mexican rule, the Mission San Luis Rey was taken over by the government, and its lands granted to private individuals. In 1842, José Antonio Estudillo was granted the 35,500-acre Rancho San Jacinto Viejo (Old San Jacinto), which took in most of the Valley. Members of his family received two other nearby grants, giving the Estudillo family control over some 110,000 acres in the area. The Estudillo family ran cattle on the land. José Estudillo died in 1852, but his family continued to own most of the Valley until the early 1880s. Two of his sons built two-story brick mansions in 1885 - 1886.

The oldest, built by Francisco Estudillo (1844 - 1921) in 1885, is located at Main and Seventh Streets in San Jacinto. It has been named the most significant historical building in the San Jacinto Valley and is one of the most significant in all of Riverside County. Francisco Estudillo was San Jacinto’s first Postmaster (1870), second mayor (1890), and served as the local Indian Agent for the Federal Government in the 1890s. The Estudillo family remained prominent into the 20th Century. In the late 1860s, the family began selling portions of their San Jacinto ranch, and the first American settlers moved into the Valley.

By 1868, a little community had begun to develop on the south side of the Valley, near the San Jacinto River. In 1869, a school district was established. Procco Akimo, a Russian immigrant, established the first store. In 1870, the San Jacinto Post Office was established. During the 1870s, a little town began to grow up around Procco Akimo’s store. This community was located southeast of modern downtown San Jacinto, on what is now Hewitt Street.

After the Estudillo lands were broken up in early 1889, a group of Los Angeles investors organized the San Jacinto Land Association, which acquired some 15,000 acres of the old ranch. In 1883, they laid out a rival town site less than two miles away. For several years, “Old” San Jacinto and “New” San Jacinto struggled for dominance. The battle was not settled until 1888, when the Santa Fe railroad built a branch line into the Valley from Perris, which terminated on the west side of “New” San Jacinto on land donated for the purpose by Francisco Estudillo. “Old” San Jacinto was far from the tracks and eventually faded away. The new City of San Jacinto was incorporated that same year on April 9, 1888.

By the 1870s, the Valley’s economy had moved from cattle ranching to horticulture. Early ranchers had grown grain, then apricots, walnuts and citrus production came to dominate the area. Turkey ranching and dairy farming came later. Besides agriculture, several local lime kilns added to the local economy before World War I.

Tourism also had an impact on the Valley, beginning around 1900. Natural hot springs along the north side of the Valley stimulated the development of several tourist resorts with hotels, guest cabins and bath

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 19 Setting
houses. Gilman Hot Springs was the best-known resort. It was originally developed in the 1880s, and was acquired in 1913 by the Gilman family, who ran the resort for 65 years. Soboba Hot Springs was also popular, with its Indian-style cottages scattered along the hillside. Further west was Eden Hot Springs.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 20 Methods

4.0 METHODS

4.1 Cultural Resources Records Search
A literature review of documents on file at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California, Riverside was completed by EIC staff on August 24, 2021 (Attachment A). The review consisted of an examination of the U.S. Geological Survey’s(USGS) San Jacinto, CA 7.5-minute quadrangle to evaluate the Project area for any cultural resources sites recorded or cultural resources studies conducted on the parcel and within a one-half mile radius. The EIC is the designated branch of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and houses records concerning archaeological and historic resources in Riverside, Inyo, and Mono Counties. The records search provided data on known archaeological and built environment resources as well as previous studies within one-half mile of the Project site. Data sources consulted at the EIC included archaeological records, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (DOE), historic maps, and the Historic Property Data File (HPDF) maintained by the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The HPDF contains listings for the CRHR and/or NRHP, California Historical Landmarks (CHL), and California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI).

4.2 Paleontological Resources Records Search
A paleontological resources literature review was completed by Darla Radford, Collections Manager at the Western Science Center (WSC) in Hemet, California on June 24, 2021 (Attachment B). The review provided information on geological formations, paleontological localities, the Project’s potential to adversely affect fossil resources, and mitigation recommendations.

4.3 Historic Aerial Review
An examination was made by Patrick Maxon of the historic aerial photographs at HistoricAerials.com (NETRONLINE n.d.) on January 7, 2022.

4.4 Native American Scoping
Tribal consultation under Assembly Bill (AB) 52 was initiated with Sacred Lands Search (SLF) request of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) (Attachment C). The City of San Jacinto will conduct all formal consultation with interested Tribes including initial outreach to tribes.

4.5 Field Survey
An archaeological survey of the Project site, utilizing transects spaced 10 meters apart, was conducted by VCS Archaeologist Patrick Maxon, RPA and Brian Kussman on December 17, 2021, and completed on March 2, 2022. The entire Project site was examined for the presence of cultural resources.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 21 Results

5.0 RESULTS

5.1 Cultural Resources Records Search

5.1.1 Studies
The EIC search resulted in a finding that 36 cultural resources studies have been completed within one mile of the Project site (Attachment A). None of these studies includes the Project site.

5.1.2 Resources
EIC information notes that 32 cultural resources have been recorded within a one-mile radius of the Project site (Attachment A). One resource (P-33-021063) is recorded within the Project site. It has previously been removed from the property. Native American tribes may have additional cultural resources information.

Additional cultural resources within one mile of the Project site include, among mostly built environment resources, one large basin metate (33-14710)—a prehistoric milling tool—was discovered approximately

1.5 meters below the surface in a utility trench approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the Project site. This attests to the presence of prehistoric populations in the area.

Table 1 identifies the cultural resource previously recorded on the Project site.

Table 1
Cultural Resources within the Project Site
Site Number Recorded (Year) Description Status
P-33-021063/CA-RIV10911 McKenna (2012) Devoe/Bandick Ranch Complex
Previously removed from
the Project Site
P-33-021063/CA-RIV-10911: The Devoe/Bandick Ranch Complex was constructed sometime before 1966, growing steadily until it covered the majority of the Project site with structures, stands of tree, fields, and horse pens. The site began to be cleared sometime between 2002 and 2005 and was completely cleared by 2009. When the site was recorded in 2012, it consisted of fields associated with use as pastureland.

There was scant evidence of residential demolition, but there were pipes and hydrants along the Lyon Avenue frontage and a modern drainage swale constructed along the northern property boundary. A wind row defined the property boundary on property to south. There was evidence of recent disking.

5.2 Paleontological Resources Records Search
The Western Science Center (WSC) in Hemet completed a Paleontological Records search on June 24, 2021 (Attachment B) that determined no paleontological resource localities are recorded on the Project site; however, numerous fossil localities have been found within three miles of the Project that are associated with the Diamond Valley Lake Project. According to WSC, the sediment underlying the Project area is mapped entirely as Holocene alluvium, which is typically of low paleontological sensitivity, however, the nearby Diamond Valley Lake Project localities are also mapped in Holocene alluvial and did produce a few specimens associated with the Pleistocene.

According to Radford (2021), excavations for the Project have the potential to impact paleontologically sensitive sediments and any fossils recovered from this Project would likely be scientifically significant. The

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 22 Results
WSC therefore recommends that caution should be observed during the excavation activity associated with the development of the Project area.

This information will be expanded upon in the paleontological assessment being completed concurrently for this Project (Kussman 2022).

5.3 Historic Aerial Review
An examination of historic aerial photographs (NETRONLINE n.d.) revealed that as of 1966—the earliest available aerial—some development was already evident in the northwest end of the Project site.

Additional development is seen in that area through the early 1970s. By 1978, the entire northern portion of the Project site is developed with nominal structures, immature trees, and horse pens. By the time of the next available photo in 1996, the entire Project site is developed, the trees have matured, and structures can be seen throughout the site. In 2002, the same development is extant, but by 2005, the Project site has been mostly cleared. In 2009, it is completely cleared and disked. It has remained cleared until the present day. A cultural resources map in the San Jacinto General Plan (San Jacinto n.d. RM-25) shows the western end of site within a Historic Buildings boundary.

5.4 Native American Scoping
On January 5, 2022, VCS contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to request a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search and to obtain an AB 52 tribal contacts list. The NAHC responded on March 7, 2022.

The results of the SLF Search were negative (Attachment C). The City of San Jacinto, however, has its AB 52 tribal contacts list to be used in consultation. The NAHC advises that notification letters to tribes should include the results of a records search, pedestrian survey, and SLF search. Ethnographic and geotechnical studies should also be provided. The City of San Jacinto will conduct this consultation.

The following is the City of San Jacinto’s AB 52 Tribal consultation list:
• Morongo Band of Mission Indians; Honorable Robert Martin, Chairperson. • Morongo Band of Mission Indians; Denisa Torres, Cultural Heritage Program Coordinator. • Pechanga Band of Mission Indians; Ebru Ozdil, Cultural Analyst, Pechanga Cultural Resources Department.
• Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians; Deneen Pelton, Administrative Assistant, Cultural Resources Department.
• Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians; Sheryl Madrigal, Manager, Cultural Resources Department. • Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Director. • Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians; Jessica Valdez, Assistant to the Cultural Resource Director. • Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians; Patricia Garcia, Director of Tribal Historic Preservation Office.
• Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians; Alicia Reed, Cultural Resource Coordinator. • San Manuel Band of Mission Indians; Ryan Nordness, Cultural Resources Analyst.

5.5 Field Survey
Patrick Maxon, VCS Director of Cultural Services and Brian Kussman conducted a pedestrian survey of the Project site on December 17, 2021 and completed it on March 2, 2022. The site had recently been completely disked. Starting in the southwest corner of the site, nearest N. Lyon Avenue and Appaloosa Drive, the 2021 survey consisted of north/south transects spaced approximately 10 meters apart, moving east to west, the entire site was examined closely. The survey in 2022 was concentrated on the newly added

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 23 Results
southeast corner of the Project site. The site previously was developed with a ranch (NETRONLINE n.d.), which was removed from the site after 2005. No remnants of the ranch or any other cultural resources were observed.

Disked Site; South side; View to Northeast

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 24 Management Considerations

6.0 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines contains the Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, which includes, for Section V. Cultural Resources, questions relating to cultural resources, including the historic built environment, historic and prehistoric archaeology, and human remains. The issues presented in the Initial Study Checklist have been used as significance criteria. Accordingly, a project may result in a significant environmental impact if:
• The Project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5.
• The Project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5.
• The Project would disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.

Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines Section VII, Geology and Soils, includes an additional question related to the presence or absence of fossil resources on the Project site. Accordingly, a project may result in a significant environmental impact if:
• The Project directly or indirectly destroys a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature.

Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines Section XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources includes additional questions related to the presence or absence of Tribal Cultural Resources on the Project site. They are as follows:
• Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

The purpose of the cultural resources assessment is to identify any historical resources or (through tribal consultation) tribal cultural resources that may exist on the Project site, to determine the sensitivity of the Project site for the presence of buried archaeological and/or paleontological material, and to make recommendations to the lead agency regarding the development of mitigation measures to reduce the impacts of the Project on resources to a less than significant level.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 25 Summary and Recoomendations

7.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An examination of historic aerial photographs (NETRONLINE n.d.) revealed that the Project site was formerly developed with a ranch. The entire Project site was razed and disked beginning around 2005.

The sediment underlying the project area is mapped entirely as Holocene alluvium; however, the nearby Diamond Valley Lake Project localities are also mapped in Holocene alluvial has produce significant fossil specimens associated with the Pleistocene. The paleontology will be addressed in a separate study (Kussman 2022).

Implementation of the proposed Project would not adversely affect any existing known cultural resources.

However, because the area is known to contain resources, archaeological monitoring is recommended during ground disturbing activities.

7.1 Mitigation Measures

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 26 Summary and Recoomendations
b. The Project archeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols.
c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological and Tribal monitors (if applicable) shall be on-site, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. Monitoring is recommended in younger Holocene alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated.
5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed.
6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operation in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the lead agency at the time of discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The lead agency must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program to mitigate impacts shall be implemented by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the lead agency before being carried out using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the county coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the NAHC) shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. a. Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered, and features recorded using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s) shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis. b. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be used in the event of a discovery:
i. Preservation-in-Place. Avoidance, or preservation-in-place, involves leaving a resource where it was found with no development affecting its integrity. Pursuant

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 27 Summary and Recoomendations
to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and cultural resources. ii. Reburial on the Project site in an area not subject to future disturbance. Reburial of a resource shall include provisions to protect the selected reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all required cataloging and basic recording have been completed, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. The listing of contents and the location of the reburial shall be included in a confidential Phase IV monitoring report. c. If Preservation-in-Place or reburial is not feasible, all cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards in a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources (OHP 1993). The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title and accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation.
7) A Phase IV Monitoring Report, documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context, shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the lead agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include DPR Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. The Phase IV report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the consulting Tribe(s).

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 28 Certification

8.0 CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this archaeological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DATE: April 2022 SIGNED:
_________________________________
Patrick Maxon., RPA
Director, Cultural Resources

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 29 References

9.0 REFERENCES
Applegate, R.B.
1979 The Black, the Red, and the White: Duality and Unity in the Luiseño Cosmos. The Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 1(1):71-88.

Basgall, Mark E.
1987 Resource Intensification Among Hunter-Gathers: Acorn Economies in Prehistoric Southern California. Research in Economics Anthropology 9:21-52.

Bean, Lowell J.
1972 Mukat’s People: The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
1978 Cahuilla. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California, R. F. Heizer (editor), pp. 575-587. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Bean, Lowell J. and Katherine S. Saubel
1972 Temalpakh (from the Earth): Cahuilla Indian Knowledge and Usage of Plants. Malki Museum Press, Banning.

Bean, Lowell J. and Florence C. Shipek
1972 Mukat’s People: The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
1978 Luiseño. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California R. F. Heizer (editor), pp. 550-563. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Bean, Lowell John and Charles R. Smith
1978 Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California, pp. 538-549. Robert F.

Heizer, volume editor. Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D.C.

Byrd, B. and M. Raab
2007 Prehistory if the Southern Bight: Models for a New Millennium. In California Prehistory:

Colonization, Culture, and Complexity (pp. 215–227). Terry Jones and Kathryn Klar, Editors.

Altamira Press, a Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Chartkoff, J. L. and K. K. Chartkoff
1984 The Archaeology of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

Davis, E.L., C.W. Brott, and D.L. Weide
1969 The Western Lithic Co-Tradition. San Diego Museum Papers Vol. 6, San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego.

DuBois, Constance Goddard
1908 The Religion of the Luiseño Indians of Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8:69-186.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 30 References
Erlandson, J. and R. Colton
1991 An Archaeological Context for Early Holocene Studies on the California Coast. In HunterGatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by J.M. Erlandson and R.H. Colton, pp. 1-10. Cotson Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Hampson, Paul R.
1991 Cultural Resources Survey and Test Excavation, Lake Elsinore, California. Greenwood and Associates. Report on file. Eastern Information Center, Riverside, CA.

Johnson, Allen W. and Timothy Earle
1987 The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Jones, T. and K. Klar
2007 California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity. T. Jones and K. Klar (editors), Altamira Press.

Kroeber, A.L.
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Dover Publications Inc., New York. 1907 Shoshonean Dialects of California. American Archaeology and Ethnology 4:66-165.

Kussman, Brian
2022 Phase I Paleontological Assessment, San Jacinto Residential Development Project, TTM 38202, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. On file, VCS Environmental, San Juan Capistrano.

Lovin, June
1963 A Summary Description of Luiseño Material Culture. In Archaeological Survey Annual Report 1962-1963, pp. 81-130. University of California, Los Angeles.

Mason, R.D., W.H. Bonner, S.J. Bouscaren, L. Carbone, R.O. Gibson, L.P. Klug, M.L. Peterson, and V. Popper 1997 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Results of Data Recovery at CA-ORA-225, vol. 2.

Chambers Group, Inc., Irvine, California. Submitted to Sverdrup Corporation, Irvine, California and Transportation Corridor Agencies, Santa Ana, California.

McCawley, W.
1996 The First Angelenos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press/Ballena Press Cooperative Publication, Banning and Novato, California.

Moratto, Michael J.
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando, Florida.

NETRONLINE
n.d. Historic Aerials: http://www.historicaerials.com/.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 31 References
Office of Historic Preservation
1990 Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format.

Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento, California. 1993 Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Collections, State Historical Resources Commission, Department of Parks and Recreation.

Raab, L. and T. Jones
2004 The Future of California Prehistory. In Prehistoric California: Archaeology and the Myth of Paradise, edited by L.M. Raab and T.L. Jones, pp. 204-211. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

Radford, Darla
2021 Results of Paleontological record search for the Moreno Valley Town Center Project, in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County.

Ruby, J.
1970 Culture Contact Between Aboriginal Southern California and the Southwest. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

San Jacinto, City of
n.d. City of San Jacinto General Plan. San Jacinto History - City of San Jacinto, CA (sanjacintoca.gov).

Shipley, William F.
1978 Native Languages of California. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp.80-90. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Strong, William Duncan
1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26(1): 1-358.

Sutton, Mark
2010 The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 44 (2): 1-64.

Wallace, William J.
1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology II.

Weeks, K. and Grimmer, A.
1995 The Secretary of The Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties: With Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings. U.S.

Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships, Heritage Preservation Services (Washington, D.C.).

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) San Jacinto Residential Development Project
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
April 2022 32 References
White, Raymond C.
1963 Luiseño Social Organization. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 48(2):91–194

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

ATTACHMENT A

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
(EIC)
Confidential - Not for public

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

ATTACHMENT B

PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
(WSC)
Confidential - Not for public

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

ATTACHMENT C

NATIVE AMERICAN SCOPING (NAHC)

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Local Government Tribal Consultation List Request
Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-373-3710
916-373-5471 – Fax
[email protected]
Type of List Requested
☐ CEQA Tribal Consultation List (AB 52) – Per Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1, subs. (b), (d), (e) and 21080.3.2 ☐ General Plan (SB 18) - Per Government Code § 65352.3.

Local Action Type:
___ General Plan ___ General Plan Element ___ General Plan Amendment ___ Specific Plan ___ Specific Plan Amendment ___ Pre-planning Outreach Activity Required Information
Project Title:____________________________________________________________________________ Local Government/Lead Agency: ___________________________________________________________ Contact Person: __________________________________________________________________________ Street Address: ___________________________________________________________________________ City:_____________________________________________________ Zip:__________________________ Phone:____________________________________ Fax:_________________________________________ Email:_____________________________________________
Specific Area Subject to Proposed Action
County:________________________________ City/Community: ___________________________ Project Description:

Additional Request
☐ Sacred Lands File Search - Required Information:

USGS Quadrangle Name(s):____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Township:___________________ Range:___________________ Section(s):___________________

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 2 ends

March 7, 2022
Kevin White
City of San Jacinto
Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: Native American Tribal Consultation, Pursuant to the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014), Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 (m), 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2 and 21084.3, San Jacinto Residential Development Project, Riverside County Dear Mr. White:

Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (c), attached is a consultation list of tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the above-listed project. Please note that the intent of the AB 52 amendments to CEQA is to avoid and/or mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)) (“Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource.”) Public Resources Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21084.3(c) require CEQA lead agencies to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested notice from such agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribes on projects for which a Notice of Preparation or Notice of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been filed on or after July 1, 2015. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (d) provides:

Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

The AB 52 amendments to CEQA law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction prior to receiving requests for notification of projects in the tribe’s areas of traditional and cultural affiliation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) recommends, but does not require, early consultation as a best practice to ensure that lead agencies receive sufficient information about cultural resources in a project area to avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources.

The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as:

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

Page 2 of 2 ends

• A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites;
• Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate, or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and
• If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:
• Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code section 6254.10.

3. The result of any Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was negative.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6907
Fax: (760) 699-6924
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6800
Fax: (760) 699-6919
Cahuilla
Augustine Band of Cahuilla
Mission Indians
Amanda Vance, Chairperson
P.O. Box 846
Coachella, CA, 92236
Phone: (760) 398 - 4722
Fax: (760) 369-7161
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Cabazon Band of Mission
Indians
Doug Welmas, Chairperson
84-245 Indio Springs Parkway
Indio, CA, 92203
Phone: (760) 342 - 2593
Fax: (760) 347-7880
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Daniel Salgado, Chairperson
52701 U.S. Highway 371
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 5549
Fax: (951) 763-2808
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Campo Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Ralph Goff, Chairperson
36190 Church Road, Suite 1
Campo, CA, 91906
Phone: (619) 478 - 9046
Fax: (619) 478-5818
[email protected]
Diegueno
Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay
Indians
Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson
4054 Willows Road
Alpine, CA, 91901
Phone: (619) 933 - 2200
Fax: (619) 445-9126
[email protected]
Diegueno
Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay
Indians
Robert Pinto, Chairperson
4054 Willows Road
Alpine, CA, 91901
Phone: (619) 368 - 4382
Fax: (619) 445-9126
[email protected]
Diegueno
La Posta Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Javaughn Miller, Tribal
Administrator
8 Crestwood Road
Boulevard, CA, 91905
Phone: (619) 478 - 2113
Fax: (619) 478-2125
[email protected]
Diegueno
La Posta Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson
8 Crestwood Road
Boulevard, CA, 91905
Phone: (619) 478 - 2113
Fax: (619) 478-2125
[email protected]
Diegueno
1 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed San Jacinto Residential Development Project, Riverside County.

PROJ-2022-
000927
03/07/2022 11:09 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Tribal Consultation List
Riverside County
3/7/2022

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla
and Cupeño Indians
Ray Chapparosa, Chairperson
P.O. Box 189
Warner Springs, CA, 92086-0189
Phone: (760) 782 - 0711
Fax: (760) 782-0712
Cahuilla
Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay
Nation
Angela Elliott Santos, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1302
Boulevard, CA, 91905
Phone: (619) 766 - 4930
Fax: (619) 766-4957
Diegueno
Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Michael Linton, Chairperson
P.O Box 270
Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070
Phone: (760) 782 - 3818
Fax: (760) 782-9092
[email protected]
Diegueno
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Robert Martin, Chairperson
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA, 92220
Phone: (951) 755 - 5110
Fax: (951) 755-5177
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Serrano
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Ann Brierty, THPO
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA, 92220
Phone: (951) 755 - 5259
Fax: (951) 572-6004
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Serrano
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula
Rd.

Pala, CA, 92059
Phone: (760) 891 - 3515
Fax: (760) 742-3189
[email protected]
Cupeno
Luiseno
Pechanga Band of Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6000
Fax: (951) 695-1778
[email protected]
Luiseno
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
Jill McCormick, Historic
Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Phone: (760) 572 - 2423
historicpreservation@quechantrib
e.com
Quechan
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
Joseph Hamilton, Chairperson
P.O. Box 391670
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 4105
Fax: (951) 763-4325
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 749 - 1051
Fax: (760) 749-5144
[email protected]
Luiseno
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 297 - 2635
[email protected]
Luiseno
2 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

PROJ-2022-
000927
03/07/2022 11:09 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Tribal Consultation List
Riverside County
3/7/2022

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair
P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 659 - 2700
Fax: (951) 659-2228
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 654 - 5544
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural
Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 663 - 5279
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla
Indians
Thomas Tortez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1160
Thermal, CA, 92274
Phone: (760) 397 - 0300
Fax: (760) 397-8146
[email protected]
Cahuilla
3 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

PROJ-2022-
000927
03/07/2022 11:09 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Tribal Consultation List
Riverside County
3/7/2022

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

ATTACHMENT
D

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) PATRICK MAXON, M.A., RPA
Director | Cultural Services
A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com

EDUCATION
1994/MA/Anthropology/
California State University,
Fullerton
1987/BA/Psychology/Sociology
Towson State University,
Towson, MD
VCS TEAM MEMBER SINCE 2017

CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING
Riverside County
Transportation and Land
Management Agency Certified
Archaeologist (No. 226)
California Energy Commission
Cultural Resources Specialist
(2001)
Registered Professional
Archaeologist (National)/No.
11468/Register of Professional
Archaeologists
Orange County Certified
Archaeologist (1999)
National Historic Preservation
Act Section 106 Compliance
Advanced Certification, 2002
Principal Investigator, Southern
California/Bureau of Land
Management
ABOUT
Patrick Maxon M.A., RPA is a Registered Professional Archaeologist with more than 27 years of experience in all aspects of cultural resources management, including prehistoric and historic archaeology, paleontology, ethnography, and tribal consultation. He has expertise in compliance with NEPA, CEQA, the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, and the Clean Water Act, among others.

Patrick has completed hundreds of cultural resources projects throughout Southern California and in Arizona and Nevada that have involved (1) agency, client, Native American, and subcontractor coordination and consultation; (2) treatment plans and research design development; (3) archival research; (4) field reconnaissance; (5) site testing; (6) data recovery excavation; (7) construction monitoring; (8) site recordation; (9) site protection/preservation; (10) mapping/cartography; (11) laboratory analysis; and (12) report production. He has managed projects within the jurisdiction of the USACE, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Reclamation, and other federal agencies that require compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. He has also completed projects throughout Southern California under CEQA for State and local governments and municipalities, including Caltrans, the Department of General Services (DGS), the California Energy Commission, the California Department of Water Resources, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the Los Angeles Unified School District, and others. Patrick meets the Secretary of Interior's standards for historic preservation programs for archaeology and is a Certified Archaeologist in Orange County and for the Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency.

SELECT EXPERIENCE/PROJECTS
Diamond Sports Complex, Lake Elsinore, CA: VCS is undertaking a cultural resources investigation that was initiated by developing a cultural resources monitoring plan with the Pechanga and Soboba Tribes. We subsequently commenced the controlled grading of site CA-RIV-4042 as required in the project mitigation measures. The project was suspended after the discovery of human remains. The City and tribes are consulting on the disposition of the burial.

Mission Trail Development, Lake Elsinore, CA: VCS completed cultural and paleontological resources monitoring, guided by a Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan that we developed, of grading for a housing development. Cultural resources recovered from the site were subsequently reburied on site by the Tribal monitors from the Pechanga and Soboba tribes. Two paleontological specimens: a pair of Mammoth ribs and a horse vertebra, were recovered and analyzed. As they were not museum quality specimens, they were made into a display by the project Applicant.

Home Sweet Home Development, Lakeland Village, CA: Project Manager for a Phase I cultural resources survey. The study consisted of (1) archaeological and paleontological records searches, (2) Native American consultation with the NAHC and subsequent communication with several tribes that wished to consult; (3) pedestrian survey of the project site; and (4) a technical report describing the results of the study and recommended mitigation measure for any potential impacts to resources. No resources were discovered.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) PATRICK MAXON, M.A., RPA
Director| Cultural Resources VCS Environmental
A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com
Qualified ArchaeologistSecretary of Interior Standards and Guidelines of Professional
Qualification & Standards for
Archeology, as per Title 36,
Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 61/

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Pacific Coast Archaeological
Society
Society for California
Archaeology
Society for American
Archaeology
Association of Environmental
Professionals (OCAEP Board
member since 2005)
Summerly Development Project Cultural Resources Monitoring, Lake Elsinore, CA:

Project Manager for this project, which included grading for a drainage channel, a large sewer line, the subsequent residential development, and a 71-1cre detention basin.

Patrick managed the placement and work of VCS monitors on the project and ensured that any discovery of cultural or paleontological resources was handled appropriately.

Daily field notes describing the activities performed each day were maintained by monitors and were included in the final report. No cultural resources were observed or collected during monitoring activities; however, a large, important assemblage of Pleistocene fossils (bison, camel, mammoth, et al.) was recovered from the lake sediments and recently curated at the Western Science Center in Hemet Godinho Dairy Project Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment, Eastvale, California. Mr.

Maxon was the Cultural Resources Project Manager for the Godhino Dairy Project located in the City of Eastvale. He conducted a Phase I cultural resources study for the project, which included cultural and paleontological resources literature reviews, Native American scoping, and a pedestrian field survey of the project site. The site contains the extant remains of the Godinho Dairy which dates to at least the early 1960s. Three prehistoric archaeological sites are recorded within one mile of the project site; one (CARIV-2801) was recorded just a few hundred feet to the southeast. The Santa Ana River was used extensively by prehistoric populations of the area. Paleontologically sensitive Older Quaternary Alluvium likely lies at depth on the project site. No significant archeological resources were discovered on the project site during the survey. The extant Godinho Dairy complex appears to exceed 50 years of age and its recordation and evaluation as a historic resource was recommended. The proposed project would allow for development of the dairy property into a residential neighborhood.

La Rivera Drainage Project Cultural Resources Services, Riverside, California. Mr.

Maxon served as the Cultural Resources Project Manager for the La Rivera Drainage Project located in the City of Riverside. The Phase I cultural resources study included (1) a cultural resources literature review of the project site at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California, Riverside; (2) contact with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a review of its Sacred Lands File and to obtain a list of Native American contacts for the project area; (3) preparation of informational letters to all the NAHC-listed contacts in order to ensure a good-faith effort of participation and (4) conducted a paleontological resources literature review for the project at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLA). No cultural resources were discovered and no impacts are anticipated. The project proposed to improve existing drainage conditions within the La Rivera residential development and BonTerra Consulting prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for its implementation.

Riverside Energy Resource Center Archaeological and Paleontological, and Biological Services, Riverside County. Mr. Maxon served as the Program Director for the archaeological, paleontological, and biological services at the Riverside Energy Resource Center in Riverside County. He managed all aspects of the archaeological, paleontological, historic, and biological surveys of the power plant site and its associated transmission lines and pipelines; he also coordinated monitoring the power plant site and its associated facilities. Mr. Maxon maintained client contacts, coordinated with the California Energy Commission, and communicated with the Riverside public utilities. In addition, he conducted cultural resources surveys and monitoring, completed the cultural resources survey report, and wrote monthly cultural resources monitoring reports and a final project report.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) PATRICK MAXON, M.A., RPA
Director| Cultural Resources VCS Environmental
A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com
Biological and Cultural Resources Surveys, Jurisdictional Delineations, Track Upgrade from Thermal to Araz. Mr. Maxon was the Cultural Resources Project Manager for the Biological and Cultural Resources Surveys, Jurisdictional Delineations, and Track Upgrade from Thermal to Araz. The project began by consulting and coordinating with local, State, and/or federal agencies (as appropriate); the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO); the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR); and other relevant agencies to develop a Programmatic Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to consider the cultural resources associated with the project. Mr. Maxon and his crew conducted an intensive 100 percent pedestrian cultural resources survey of the area of potential effect (APE) in transects. Initial Native American consultation and bridge and culvert recordation were provided. There are approximately 609 structures (bridges and culverts) in the project area, of which 512 were built between 1903 and 1960 and are considered historic. An Architectural Historian visited each structure and produced a Primary Record (DPR 523A) and a Location Map (DPR523J).

Desert Ranch Project Cultural Survey, Riverside County. Mr. Maxon served as the Project Manager for the Desert Ranch Project, which consists of approximately seven square miles of desert overlooking the Salton Sea. He helped to provide a Phase I Cultural Resource Inventory for the Client, which entailed a walk of the entire property to survey for archaeological sites. Over 40 sites were recorded and excavation of several is anticipated. In addition to conducting surveys, Mr. Maxon met with the local Indian tribe, the Torres-Martinez Band of Cahuilla Indians, regarding this project.

Lake Elsinore East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Area Cultural Resources Services, City of Lake Elsinore. Mr. Maxon was the Project Manager of the Lake Elsinore East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Area. He was responsible for the assessment of known cultural resources and preparation of final report.

Encino Water Quality Improvement Program Archaeological Monitoring, Encino. As the Project Manager for the Encino Water Quality Improvement Program, Mr. Maxon monitored excavations for pipelines.

Stone Canyon Water Quality Improvement Project Prehistoric Cultural and Biological Resources Investigation and Monitoring, City of Los Angeles. Mr. Maxon was the Project Manager for the Stone Canyon Water Quality Improvement Project in Los Angeles County and was responsible for reconnaissance and report preparation.

Salton Sea Solar Evaporation Pond Pilot Project Archaeological Survey, Imperial County. Mr. Maxon was the Project Manager of the Salton Sea Solar Evaporation Pond Pilot Project. He conducted a field reconnaissance and produced a final report.

East Branch Extension Phase II Water Pipeline Project, Mentone. Mr. Maxon was the Cultural Resources Manager for the East Branch Extension Phase II Water Pipeline Project. The project involved the preparation of all CEQA/NEPA environmental documents, the acquisition of regulatory permits, and construction monitoring. Mr.

Maxon was responsible for a full range of cultural resources services including historic, prehistoric and paleontological archival research, field surveys, evaluation of resources, and report preparation 6th Street Viaduct Project, Los Angeles. As Cultural Resources Project Manager, Mr. Maxon was responsible for coordinating with the California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans’s) District 7 on the previously submitted draft Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) and the project’s Area of Potential Effects (AEP) and completing the ASR and Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) Action Plan, which included several revisions, for the proposed project. The ESA Action Plan was developed to protect an archaeological site that was recorded within the AEP. The plan entails

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) PATRICK MAXON, M.A., RPA
Director| Cultural Resources VCS Environmental
A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com
surrounding the site with fencing during construction and monitoring of construction in the vicinity of the site.

Saddleback Meadows Development Archaeological Test Excavations, Orange County.

Mr. Maxon was the Program Director of archaeological test excavations for the Saddleback Meadows Development Project. He performed test excavations of ten prehistoric archaeological sites and developed a treatment plan and research design in compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA for two sites (CA-ORA-710 and CA-ORA-711).

Mr. Maxon conducted test excavations on two additional sites (CA-ORA-1435H and CAORA-1437), a data recovery excavation (CA-ORA-711), and laboratory and report preparation. Additionally, he developed a testing plan to evaluate two prehistoric sites (CA-ORA-713 and CA-ORA-715), managed the excavation of those sites, and maintained budgets and relations with the client (TPG Management) and the USACE.

Orange County Water District On-Call Environmental Analyses Services, Orange County, CA: Cultural Resources Manager for the On-Call Contract. Mr. Maxon has provided environmental analyses services on an as-needed basis as part of on-call contracts with the Orange County Water District since 2010. Representative cultural resources task orders completed as part of the on-call contracts, include the following:
• La Palma Recharge Basin, Anaheim, CA
• Prado Basin Mitigation Sites, Orange County, CA
• Fletcher Basin Improvement Project Cultural and Paleontological Resources Mitigation Monitoring Plan, City of Orange, CA
• Centennial Park Injection Well Project, Santa Ana, CA • EW-1 Groundwater Containment and Treatment Project, City of Fullerton, CA. • Santiago Recharge Basin Project, Orange, CA

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

BRIAN KUSSMAN
Senior Paleontologist
A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com

EDUCATION
B.A., Earth Science, California
State University Fullerton

CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING
AEP CEQA Basics Training,
October 2021

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
South Coast Geologic Society
Member
Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology
Association of Environmental
Professionals
ABOUT
Brian began working for VCS Environmental in 2018 and has over 27 years of experience conducting paleontolgical research, field survey, fossil salvage, fossil preparation, laboratory identification, report preparation, and curatorial experience throughout Southern California. This includes background research, project proposals and reports, field surveys and monitoring, lab preparation and storage, identification and analysis, and curation of paleontological materials in repositories. Project experience includes housing construction, business construction, highway construction, and public utilities development throughout Southern California. He is also responsible for field monitoring, and has assisted with archaeological surveying, monitoring, and the preparation of paleontological monitoring reports.

SELECT EXPERIENCE

PALEONTOLOGY
− Led and worked alongside Mark Roeder on many salvage excavations with L&L, PEA, and VCS. Also led salvage excavations with LSA. Led excavation for a mostly complete Mastodon skeleton at Majestic in California.
− Volunteer experience since 1989 at Clark Regional Park Interpretative Center, including several research projects.
− Monitoring experience on southern California sites, since 1994. − Pleistocene fossil mammal identification expert.
− Familiarity with other fossil types found in local rock units. − Volunteer at Rancho La Brea during the 1991 summer volunteer session. − Sampled carbon, using proper field protocols for contamination prevention, for radiometric dating.
− Briefly assisted with curation at the John Cooper Center in 2016.

GEOLOGY
− Led drilling efforts utilizing hollow stem auger, sonic, reverse mud rotary (800 foot + boreholes), standard mud rotary (130 feet to 325 feet boreholes) and direct push. − Logged soil cuttings, from both conventional and mud drill rigs. − Utility clearance oversight: utility company record searches, metal detection, ground penetrating radar, hand auger, and air knife.
− Groundwater and soil sampling for pollutants, GW sampling includes use of all types of pumps commonly used and interface probes for sounding (lead on those projects). − Borehole geological description entry and creation of diagrams using LogPlot software, and report QA.
− Hazwoper 40 taken but would need to retake, TWIC card clearance. − Familiar with rock and mineral identification.

ARCHAEOLOGY
− Found numerous hearth features in Orange County with Psomas and LSA, as well as lithic artifacts associated with these features. One complete hearth feature excavated with LSA.
− Sampled carbon, for radiometric dating, from these features. − Archaeological monitoring for both prehistoric and historic resources. − Excavation experience recently at a central California coastal site extremely rich in lithics.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

BIOLOGY
− Twice, verified for authorities, that remains were not human. Very familiar with differences between human and other mammalian osteology. − Familiar with local endangered/threatened animals and plants. − Familiar with taxonomy and field identification of cacti and succulents of the Southwest.

INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Ralph B. Clark Regional Park Interpretive Center
Ralph B. Clark Regional Park includes an interpretive center with an extensive fossil collection. It displays marine fossils dating from about one million years ago, to more recent terrestrial mammals that walked the earth tens of thousands of years ago.

These specimens were recovered inside the boundaries of Clark Park, and from the development of the Coyote Hills area in northern Orange County. Brian has volunteered at the park since 1989 and his experience includes the following:
• Worked extensively with modern comparative collections at the Interpretative Center, for identification purposes. • Learned fossil preparation techniques (Pleistocene predominantly, but also Miocene terrestrial fossils of the SespeVaqueros Formation as well as marine vertebrates from throughout Orange County). • Acted as unofficial collections manager at the Ralph B. Clark Interpretive Center. • From late 1990’s, began with research, primarily focused on the Pleistocene terrestrial fossils from the Ralph B. Clark Park.
• In 2014, presented a poster at SVP pinpointing the age of the terrestrial fossils in the park. Also coauthored a poster concerning the age of the Oso Member (primarily exposed in Orange County), of the Capistrano Formation. • Beginning of 2020, began a research project with paleontologists from Anza-Borrego State Park, concerning a rare animal only found in sufficient numbers for research, at these 2 institutions. • Worked on several other research projects for Ralph B. Clark Interpretive Center, including a collaborative project with paleontologists at Anza-Borrego State Park, concerning a rare fossil animal found at both localities.

George C. Page Museum - Rancho La Brea
Rancho La Brea represents the largest collection of late Pleistocene asphaltic fossils in the world, and uses this opportunity to train students, build collections through excavation, prepare and conserve fossils in our public viewing Fossil Lab and curate this massive collection onsite. Rancho La Brea staff also use these collections to study scientific questions with visiting academics. Brian volunteered at Rancho La Brea in 1991 and his experience includes the following:
• Preparation and reconstruction of Mammoth and Mastodon limb bone specimens. • Separation and initial sorting of microfossils from matrix. • Sorting and identification of fossils returned to Rancho La Brea from the California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA.
• Cursory observation of Western Camel vertebrae, as part of a potential research project.

SPEAKER AT THE SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY 75TH ANNUAL MEETING | OCTOBER 14-17, 2015

VERTEBRATE FAUNA AND UNGULATE BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE HIGHLY FOSSILIFEROUS OSO SAND MEMBER, CAPISTRANO FORMATION, ORANGE COUNTY, CA.

Barboza, Michelle, California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States of America Parham, James F., John D. Cooper Archaeology and Paleontology Center, California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States of America
Kussman, Brian N., California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States of America The Oso Sand Member is the highly fossiliferous, nearshore facies of the Capistrano Formation, which spans the southwestern rim of the Los Angeles Basin in Orange County, California. Over 20 vertebrate taxa have been identified from this unit, including well preserved fossils of marine taxa, such as a nearly complete skull of a blue marlin and the most complete fossil walrus found to date. In addition to other marine

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

BRIAN KUSSMAN
Senior Paleontologist VCS Environmental
A certified SBE, DBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com
mammals (whales and sea cows), terrestrial mammals are also known from the Oso Sand Member including gomphotheriids, rhinocerotids, antilocaprids, canids, cricetids, and lagomorphs. Despite the abundance of material from Oso Sand Member sites, just three papers have reported on this unit: one paper focused on the skull of the blue marlin mentioned above, the other two mentioned mammal fossils in passing. We provide an overview of all known vertebrate fossils from Oso Sand Member, and establish a more refined age for the Oso Sand Member, which will help provide a temporal framework for ongoing paleontological studies. Based on stratigraphic correlation, the Capistrano Formation is reported as Upper Miocene to Lower Pliocene. Previous workers have referred to undescribed specimens to place the Oso Sand Member in the Hemphillian North American Land Mammal Age. Partial camelid teeth are identified as Alforjas, known from the late early to latest Hemphillian (Hh2 to Hh4). Horse teeth previously referred to Pliohippus (Barstovian to Hemphillian) are reidentified as Dinohippus interpolatus, which is characteristic of the early late Hemphillian (Hh3). Based on these identifications, we can constrain the age of the Oso Sand Member to the early late Hemphillian (Hh3). By better defining the age of the Oso Sand Member, we can place the marine and terrestrial vertebrate fossils from this unit into a more precise chronostratigraphic framework that allows us to make more detailed comparisons to other late Neogene faunas in California.

BIOSTRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF MAMMALIAN TAXA REVISES THE AGE OF RICH PLEISTOCENE SITES FROM THE LA HABRA

FORMATION (ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA) FROM RANCHO LA BREAN TO IRVINGTONIAN Kussman, Brian N., California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States of America Parham, James F., John D. Cooper Archaeology and Paleontology Center, California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States of America
Babilonia, Lisa C., Clark Paleontology Museum, Buena Park, CA, United States of America This study provides a new age assessment for the La Habra Formation at the Emery Borrow Pit, Ralph B. Clark Regional Park, Orange County, California, which contains one of the richest non-asphalt Pleistocene sites in California. Over 35 species of mammal, 19 species of birds, and 16 species of amphibians and reptiles have been identified from this site, although it remains poorly represented in the literature. Although Pleistocene terrestrial fossils from the Emery Borrow Pit have been mentioned occasionally, to date only a single fossil, a tapir tooth (Tapirus merriami), has been described and figured from the La Habra Formation. The La Habra Formation has been assigned to the Rancholabrean North American Land Mammal Age largely due to its proximity to another site, La Mirada. However, unlike La Mirada and other Rancholabrean sites, no Bison (a hallmark taxon for the Rancholabrean) have been found at the Emery Borrow Pit. This is despite an abundance of grazers such as Camelops and Equus have been found. Furthermore, the Microtus from the La Habra Formation most closely resemble Microtus meadensis (an Irvingtonian taxon). Combined with the presence of Megalonyx jeffersonii (known from the Late Irvingtonian to Rancholabrean), the Microtus and the lack of Bison suggest a late Irvingtonian age for the La Habra Formation. Faunas from the Irvingtonian are relatively rare compared to those from the Rancholabrean, increasing this site's importance for interpreting other Pleistocene faunas in the region. The high diversity and antiquity of the fauna from La Habra Formation present an excellent opportunity to characterize the fauna of the Los Angeles Basin just prior to the well-known asphalt site of Rancho La Brea, less than 40 km away.

PUBLICATION
Barboza, M.M., J.F. Parham, G-P. Santos, B.N. Kussman, J. Velez-Juarbe. 2017. The age of the Oso Member, Capistrano Formation, and a review of fossil crocodylians from California. PaleoBios, 34. ucmp_paleobios_33797.

SELECT PROJECTS
SUMMERLY PROJECT | LAKE ELSINORE, CA
Summerly is a 706-acre master-planned golf community in the Lake Elsinore Back Basin. The development consists of approximately 1,955 residential units, 40 acres of roads, and 329 acres of open space, including an 18-hole golf course. This project included grading for a drainage channel, a large sewer line, the subsequent residential development, and a 71-acre detention basin which required cultural monitors on the project and ensured that any discovery of cultural or paleontological resources was handled appropriately. No archaeological resources were observed or collected during monitoring activities; however, a large, important assemblage of Pleistocene fossils (bison, camel, mammoth, et al.) was recovered from the lake sediments and recently curated at the Western Science Center in Hemet. Brian identified fossil remains during the course of salvage excavation efforts so as to prevent damage to adjacent fossils not yet uncovered.

YORBA LINDA ESTATES - LAKEVIEW AVENUE | YORBA LINDA, CA Shea Homes retained VCS Environmental (VCS) to provide cultural and paleontological resources monitoring pursuant to Mitigation Measures 122, 129, 130, and 131, of the Yorba Linda Estates Mitigation Monitoring Program developed in the project’s Initial Study, govern the mitigation of impacts to paleontological, archaeological, and Tribal Cultural resources. Due to the project’s location near a waterway and former existence as a nursery, it required monitoring for cultural and historic

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

BRIAN KUSSMAN
Senior Paleontologist VCS Environmental
A certified SBE, DBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com
resources, as well as paleontological. Monitoring occurred on 80 separate days beginning in April 2018 and extending through October 17, 2018. The Lead Monitor for the project was VCS Archaeologist/Paleontologist, Brian Kussman. Brian monitored for paleontological and cultural resources during soil removal as part of remediation, mass excavation, and deep utility trenching.

LANDMARK | CHINO, CA
The construction project includes grading of lots for the development of 38 single family homes and trenching for the installation of sewer, water, and utilities. Monitoring of this work was required pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Mitigation Measures (MMs) CUL-1 through CUL-3 developed in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the project (Dudek 2017). Monitoring occurred on 90 separate days beginning on February 11, 2019, with grubbing and clearing and extending through December 20, 2019. Brian monitored for both paleontological and cultural resources on this project.

RANCHO DIAMANTE PROJECT | HEMET, CA
The 244.9-acre Rancho Diamante Project site is located south of the Hemet-Ryan Airport in the City of Hemet. The proposed Project is a subdivision of 294 residential lots with paseos and open space consisting of residences, roadways, a stormwater drainage system, and associated infrastructure. To achieve said development, grading operations are required to obtain finished grade elevations. The grading operation will consist of 370,000 cubic yards of excavation and embankment of native soil. Brian monitored for both paleontological and cultural resources.

PACIFIC MAYFIELD CULTURAL MONITORING | MENIFEE, CA
The current project site consists of approximately the southern half (Parcels 5-10) of the 2001 site boundaries. La Piedra Road defines the northern end of the current Project site, and Holland Road defines its southern boundary. Brian has conducted both paleontological and cultural resource monitoring at Pacific Mayfield.

STATE ROUTE 210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE PROJECT | CITIES

OF HIGHLAND, SAN BERNARDINO, AND REDLANDS, CA
The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 8 and the City of Highland, proposes to widen State Route 210 (SR-210) from Sterling Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue in the cities of Highland, San Bernardino, and Redlands, as well as a portion of unincorporated San Bernardino County, California. The land uses surrounding the proposed project corridor are urban and moderately densely developed primarily with residential, public facilities, open space, and general commercial uses. The widening would occur between post miles (PM) Revised (R) 26.3 and R32.4, for a total distance of 6.1 miles. The total length of the proposed project limits is approximately 8.2 miles (PM R25.0 to R33.2), which includes transition striping and signage. Within the limits of the proposed project, SR-210 is a four-lane divided freeway with two 12-foot-wide lanes in each direction, which are flanked by five foot-wide left and right shoulders. The purpose of the proposed project is to reduce congestion and improve operational efficiency by providing lane continuity with existing segments of freeway west and east of the proposed project limits. Brian monitored excavations into native alluvium for new bridge foundations. Excavations took place along a several mile section of SR-210 in Highland, CA.

BANNING DISTRIBUTION CENTER PROJECT | BANNING, CA
The project property encompasses 108 acres, with 64.1 acres onsite and 43.9 acres for offsite improvements. The project is located south of Interstate 10 and the Southern Pacific Railroad and north of the Banning Municipal Airport at the eastern edge of the City of Banning. Ground disturbance is estimated to reach a maximum depth of 33 feet below the current grade. The offsite improvements to the project include a road, fire access road, sewer, and water lines. The proposed project’s offsite roadways include a 5,688 linear foot extension of John Street from the project’s west property line to Lincoln Street and a 3,871 linear foot emergency fire access roadway at the southwestern corner of the property, across a creek that flows to Smith Creek, and onto Banning Airport property. The offsite utility improvements include a sewer line and an associated lift station; the lift station is approximately 0.4 miles from the southern edge of the project. A water line will start where the line will tie into the existing water line at the intersection of South Hathaway Street and East Barbour Street, then north on Hathaway and east on the extension of John Street. The remaining water line will be located east and south of the project site, terminating at the intersection of Scott Street and East Westward Avenue. Brian monitored for paleontological and cultural resources during all stages of construction.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

BRIAN KUSSMAN
Senior Paleontologist VCS Environmental
A certified SBE, DBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com
ONTARIO GATEWAY PROJECT | ONTARIO, CA
The approximately 21-acre project site, located within the City of Ontario, is situated on the east side of Mill Creek Avenue, south of Ontario Ranch Road, and west of vacant/undeveloped land. The project site is located within the Standalone Residential land use district of the Rich-Haven Specific Plan and consists of Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 0218-652-27. Brian monitored for paleontological and cultural resources due to the project’s proximity to a very fossiliferous site immediately east of Ontario Gateway, made it of high sensitivity.

TIERRA DEL SOL BENTON PARCEL | RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA
The 16.6-acre project site is located within the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) of unincorporated Riverside County, approximately

1.2 miles east of the City of Murrieta and approximately 2.8 miles north of the City of Temecula. Tentative Tract Map No. 37715 proposes to subdivide the 16.6-acre lot into 141 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 2,700 square feet and a density of

8.75 dwelling units per acre. Access into the subdivision will be provided from San Remo Drive and Benton Road. Two detention basins will be constructed within the project site; one located along the northwestern corner of the project site and the other to the east of the main entrance along Benton Road. Brian monitored for paleontological and cultural resources, including historic, during the initial ground disturbances through to completion of mass excavation.

HEIRLOOM FARMS/HARVESTON CULTURAL RESOURCES MONITORING | TEMECULA, CA The project consists of a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit, single-family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots. VCS provided archaeological and paleontological resources monitoring, Tribal Coordination to develop a Monitoring Agreement with Pechanga, Sensitivity Training at the pre-grade meeting, preparation of a Cultural Resources Treatment Plan, and a Phase IV Negative Findings Monitoring Report. Brian provided paleontological and cultural resources monitoring, during mass excavation, on this project.

ORCHARD HILLS | TUSTIN, CA
Found numerous sites of cultural significance including numerous hearth features, and lithic sites. Participated in the gridded excavation and documentation of a hearth Feature. Multiple carbon samples taken, from hearths, for radiometric dating. Both terrestrial and marine fossil locations were also recovered on this project.

OLINDA LANDFILL | BREA, CA
Brian served as paleontological field technician to perform monitoring at the Brea-Olinda Landfill. He monitored and reported compliance with mitigation measures. He also prepared and identified fossil remains recovered from the excavations into a very fossiliferous marine unit, the Puente Formation.

SANTIAGO CANYON LANDFILL | UNINCORPORATED ORANGE COUNTY, CA Paleontological field technician at Santiago Canyon Landfill. Brian monitored for compliance with mitigation measures, screenwashed sediments for microfossils, in addition to preparing and identifying fossil remains from the project site.

SIMI VALLEY LANDFILL | SIMI VALLEY, CA
Brian served as paleontological field technician monitoring at several construction projects. He monitored and reported compliance with mitigation measures. He also prepared and identified fossil remains recovered from numerous sites on the project area.

PRIMA DESHECHA LANDFILL | SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
Brian monitored for both paleontological and archaeological resources at the Prima Deshecha Landfill. Archaeological resources consisted of both Native American and historic features. He also participated in the recovery excavations of 2 different whale fossils approximately 10 years apart.

LA PATA ROAD EXTENSION | SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO/SAN CLEMENTE, CA Brian performed paleontological and archaeological monitoring for the La Pata Road Extension. Archaeological resources consisted of both Native American and historic features. Paleontological resources were derived from the marine Capistrano Formation outcrops on the project.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

BRIAN KUSSMAN
Senior Paleontologist VCS Environmental
A certified SBE, DBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com

EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE
VCS Environmental
30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Paleontologist/Cultural Resources Monitor | Date of Employment: April 2018 to Present Dudek
605 Third Street, Encinitas, CA 92024
Paleontologist/Cultural Resources Monitor | Date of Employment: July 2021 to Present LSA and Associates
20 Executive Park, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92614
Paleontology/Cultural Resources Monitor | Date of Employment: July 2014 to May 2021 Psomas
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300, Santa Ana, CA 92707
Paleontology/Cultural Resources Monitor | Date of Employment: 2015 Ultrasystems Environmental Inc.
16431 Scientific, Irvine, CA 92618
Paleontology/Cultural Resources Monitor |Date of Employment: April 2015 to September 2015 L&L Environmental, Inc.
721 Nevada Street, Suite 307, Redlands, CA 92373
Paleontology Monitor | Salvage excavation only, 2014
Paleo Environmental Associates, Inc.
2248 Winrock Avenue, Altadena, CA 91001
Paleontology Monitor | Date of Employment: May 1993 to November 2010

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Appendix C1 - Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-PUBLIC (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) P.O. Box 1956, Vista, CA 92085 | (760) 712‐2199 | www.birdseyeplanninggroup.com July 21, 2022

Mr. Eric Turner
Director, Environmental Services
VCS Environmental, Inc.
30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
SUBJECT: Energy Calculation Memorandum for TM 38202 Project

Dear Mr. Turner;
Birdseye Planning Group (BPG) is pleased to submit this memorandum quantifying energy demand associated with the proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 38202, in the City of San Jacinto, California.

The information contained herein will assist with the preparation of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) that identifies project‐specific impacts associated with developing the proposed project.

Project Description
The proposed Project would develop an approximately 33.8‐acre vacant site with up to 181 single‐ family residential homes and associated infrastructure. The Project requires subdividing five (5) existing parcels (APNs 436‐280‐011, 436‐280‐012, 436‐280‐013, 436‐280‐014,436‐280‐025 and 436‐280‐ 025). Lot sizes would vary within an approximate range of 5,000 to 8,000 square feet. The project proposes to modify development standards and reduce the minimum RL lot size below 7,200 square feet and density above 2.1 units per acre as allowable under a Planned Development Permit (PDP), Site Plan, and Design Review.

Access to the new development would be provided from Lyon Avenue/Appaloosa Drive and Marilyn Drive/Estrella Street. Internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation would be accessible on new streets and sidewalks that would be publicly maintained in the future. Parking would be accommodated in two‐car garages, two‐car driveways, and on public streets.

Offsite improvements include connecting the proposed internal circulation system to the intersections of Lyon Avenue/Appaloosa Drive and Marilyn Drive/Estrella Street; connecting to existing utility systems within Lyon Avenue; frontage improvements along Lyon Avenue including a Class I multi‐

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Appendix D - Energy Calculation Memorandum (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Mr. Eric Turner
July 21, 2022

Page 2 ends

BIRDSEYE PLANNING GROUP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ P.O. Box 1956, Vista, CA 92085 | (760) 712‐2199 | www.birdseyeplanninggroup.com use path (per City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan), sidewalk and street lights; and constructing a portion of the San Jacinto Valley Master Drainage Plan storm drain system Line G‐3 from Marilyn Drive/Estrella Street along the northeast edge of the development to a future connection point (note:
continuation of Line G‐3 to be constructed by others) at the Monte Vista Middle School property to the north.

Project construction stages would include site preparation, import of fill soils, grading, building construction (and construction of offsite facilities), underground utility construction, export of lot spoils and street paving. Project construction is anticipated to begin in the first quarter of 2023 and end late in the first quarter of 2025.

Energy Demand
The following tables show estimated gasoline demand for construction workers (Table 1) and construction equipment (Table 2). All fuel calculations are based on the total Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) value calculated for each construction phase and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) using the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0. Data are reported in annual metric tons of CO2e for the duration of each construction phase. Metric tons are converted to kilogram CO2e and then divided by a conversion factor used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to estimate gallons of gasoline (8.87) and diesel fuel (10.18) consumed based on carbon emissions.

Table 1 shows the gasoline demand for construction workers and vendors by project phase. Table 2 shows the diesel fuel demand for equipment operation. For the purpose of determining fuel demand, it was assumed that all worker and vendor vehicles would be gasoline fueled an all haul trucks and construction equipment would diesel fueled.

Table 1
Construction Worker Gasoline Demand
CO2E
MT
Kg CO2e Gallons
Demolition – 2023 2 2,000 225
Site Preparation – 2023 3 3,000 338
Grading - 2023 6 6,000 676
Building Construction - 2023 41 41,000 4,622
Building Construction – 2024 112 112,000 12,626
Building Construction - 2025 60 60,000 6,764
Architectural Coating - 2025 3 3,000 338
Paving - 2025 2 2,000 225
Total 229 229,000 25,814

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Appendix D - Energy Calculation Memorandum (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Mr. Eric Turner
July 21, 2022

Page 3 ends

BIRDSEYE PLANNING GROUP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ P.O. Box 1956, Vista, CA 92085 | (760) 712‐2199 | www.birdseyeplanninggroup.com Table 2
Construction Equipment Diesel Demand
2021 CO2E
MT
Kg CO2e Gallons
Demolition – 2023 51 51,000 5,010
Site Preparation – 2023 306 306,000 30,058
Grading - 2023 430 430,000 42,239
Building Construction - 2023 110 110,000 10,805
Building Construction – 2024 306 306,000 30,059
Building Construction - 2025 168 168,000 16,503
Architectural Coating - 2025 8 8,000 786
Paving - 2025 35 35,000 3,438
Total 1,138 1,414,000 138,898
During operation, the project would generate demand for 1,441,600 kilotwatt hours (kWh) of electricity and 5,119,400 British Thermal Units (BTU) of natural gas annually. The annual gasoline demand would be approximately 210,259 gallons.

Please let me know if you have questions. You can reach me via e‐mail at 760‐712‐2199 or via e‐mail [email protected].

Regards,
Ryan Birdseye
Principal

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Appendix D - Energy Calculation Memorandum (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 826
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 827
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 828
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 829
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 830
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 831
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 832
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 833
Attachment: Appendix E1 - Geotechnical Investigation Update (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

NORTH OF COTTONWOOD DRIVE &

EAST OF LYON AVENUE
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014

SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA
-Prepared By;
Sladden Engineering
450 Egan Avenue
Beaumont, California 92223
(951) 845-77 43
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) - J
~ Sladden Engineering
45090 Golf Center Parkway, Suite F, Indio, California 92201 (760) 863-0713 Fax (760) 863-0847 6782 Stanton Avenue, Suite C, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369 450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 March 26, 2021
Richland Developers, Inc.
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 425
Irvine, California
Subject:

Project:

Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Residential Development
North of Cottonwood Avenue &
East of Lyon Avenue
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014
San Jacinto, California
Project No. 644-21002
21-03-030
Sladden Engineering is pleased to present the results of the geotechnical investigation performed for the residential development proposed for the site located north of Cottonwood Avenue and east of Lyon Avenue in the City of San Jacinto, California. Our services were completed in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services dated January 18, 2021 and your authorization to proceed with the work. The purpose of our investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site to provide recommendations for foundation design and the design of the various site improvements.

Evaluation of environmental issues and hazardous wastes was not included within the scope of services provided.

The opinions, recommendations and design criteria presented in this report are based on our field exploration program, laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Based . on the results of our investigation, it is our professional opinion that the proposed project should be feasible from. a geotechnical perspective provided that the recommendations presented in this report are implemented in design and carried out through construction.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitte

SLADDENE I
SER/me
Copies: 4/ Addressee
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

NORTH OF COTTONWOOD DRIVE &

EAST OF LYON A VENUE
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014

SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................................................. 2 SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................. 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING ............................................................................................................................ 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 3 SEISMICITY AND FAULTING ............................................................................................................. 4 SITE-SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS ....................................................................... 5 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ......................................................................................................................... 5 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 7 EARTHWORK AND GRADING .......................................................................................................... 8 Stripping ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Preparation of New Building Areas .............................................................................................. 8 Compaction ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Shrinkage and Subsidence .... ........ .. ... . . .. ..................... ...... ...... .. ... . .... .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . ....... ....... ...... ..... 9 CONVENTIONAL SHALLOW SPREAD FOOTINGS ...................................................................... 9 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN ................................................................................................ 10 SLABS-ON-GRADE ................................................................................................................................ 10 RETAINING WALLS .............................................................................................................................. 11 CORROSION SERIES .............................................................................................................................. 11 UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL .............................................................................................................. 11 EXTERIOR CONCRETE FLATWORK ........................................................................... ; ..................... 11 DRAINAGE .............................................................................................................................................. 12 LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 12 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ...................................................................................................................... 12 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 13 FIGURESAPPENDIXAAPPENDIXBAPPENDIXCAPPENDIXDSite Location Map Regional Geologic Map
Exploration Location Plan
Restricted Use Zone
Field Exploration
Laboratory Testing
Site-Specific Ground Motion Parameters
Liquefaction Analyses
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 1

INTRODUCTION
Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
This report presents the results of the geotechnical investigation performed for the residential development proposed for the vacant property located on the north side of Cottonwood A venue and east of Lyon Avenue in the City of San Jacinto, California. The project site is formally identified by the County of Riverside as APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 and 014 and is located at approximately 33.7900 degrees north latitude and 116.9877 degrees west longitude. The approximate location of the site is indicated on the Site Location Map (Figure 1).

Our investigation was conducted in order to evaluate the engineering properties of the subsurface materials, to evaluate their in-situ characteristics, and to provide engineering recommendations and design criteria for site preparation, foundation design and the design of various site improvements. This study also includes a review of published and unpublished geotechnical and geological literature regarding seismicity at and near the subject site.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Based on the provided site plan, it is our understanding that the proposed project will consist of constructing a new residential subdivision on the subject site. The proposed project will also include two retention basins and open spaces. Paved roadways, underground utilities, concrete flatwork, landscape areas and various other associated site improvements are also anticipated for the project. For our analyses, we expect that the proposed residential structures will consist of a relatively lightweight woodframe structures supported on conventional shallow spread footings and concrete slabs-on-grade.

Sladden expects that grading will be limited to minor cuts and fills in order to accomplish the desired elevations and to provide adequate gradients for site drainage. This does not include the removal and recompaction of the loose surface soil and primary foundation bearing soil within the proposed building pad areas. Upon completion of precise grading plans, Sladden should be retained in order to verify that the recommendations presented within in this report are properly incorporated into the design of the proposed project.

Structural foundation loads were not available at the time of this report. Based on our experience with relatively lightweight structures, we expect that isolated column loads will be less than 20 kips and continuous wall loads will be less than 2.0 kips per linear foot. If these assumed loads vary significantly from the actual loads, we should be consulted to verify the applicability of the recommendations provided.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 2

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
The purpose of our investigation was to determine specific engineering characteristics of the surface and near surface soil in order to develop foundation design criteria and recommendations for site preparation. Specifically, our site characterization consisted of the following tasks:
• Site reconnaissance to assess the existing surface conditions on and adjacent to the site. • Drilling six (6) exploratory boreholes to depths between approximately 16 feet and 51 feet bgs to characterize the subsurface soil conditions. Representative samples of the soil were classified in the field and retained for laboratory testing and engineering analyses. • Performing laboratory testing on selected samples to evaluate their engineering characteristics. • Reviewing geologic literature and discussing geologic hazards. • Performing site-specific ground motion procedures for the subject property. • Performing engineering analyses to develop recommendations for foundation design and site preparation.
• The preparation of this report summarizing our work at the site.

SITE CONDITIONS
The project site is located on the east side of Lyon Avenue and north of Cottonwood Avenue in the City of San Jacinto, California. The site is formally identified by the County of Riverside as APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 and 014 and consists of approximately 26 acres of undeveloped land. At the time of our investigation mounds of stockpiled soil were observed in the central portion of the project site. The remaining portions of the site were covered is scattered weeds and brush. Based on our review of historical Google Earth (2021) images of the project site, it appears that the site was previous occupied by scattered structures, livestock pens and horse arenas. The site is near the elevation of the adjacent properties and roadways. The subject site is generally bounded by undeveloped property to the north and immediate east, developed properties to the south and Lyon Avenue to the immediate west.

Based on our review of the San Jacinto 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Map (USGS, 2015), the site is situated at an approximate elevation of 1505 feet above mean sea level (MSL).

No natural ponding of water or surface seeps were observed at or near the site during our field investigation conducted on February 16, 2021. Site drainage appears to be controlled via sheet flow and surface infiltration.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 3

GEOLOGIC SETTING
Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
The project site is located in the Peninsular Ranges Physiographic Province of California. The Peninsular Ranges are mountainous areas that extend from the western edge of the continental borderland to the Salton Trough and from the Transverse Ranges Physiographic Province in the north to the tip of Baja California in the south. The Peninsular Ranges Physiographic Province is characterized by northwesttrending topographic and structural features that locally include the San Jacinto Structural Block. The San Jacinto Structural Block is a northwest-southeast trending elongated structural block bounded on the southwest by the San Jacinto Fault and by the San Andreas Fault Zone to the northeast. The province is characterized by elongated, northwest-southeast trending mountain ranges and valleys and is truncated at its northern margin by the east-west grain of the Transverse Ranges. Mountainous areas of the Peninsular Ranges Physiographic Province generally consist of Igneous, metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks. However, plutonic rocks of the Southern California Batholith are the dominant basement rock exposed (Jahns,. 1954).

The site has been mapped by Dibblee (2003) to be immediately underlain by young alluvium (Qa). The regional geologic setting for the site vicinity is presented on the Regional Geologic Map (Figure 2).

SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by excavating six (6) exploratory boreholes to a depths between approximately 16 and 51 feet bgs. The approximate locations of the boreholes are illustrated on the Exploration Location Plan (Figure 3). The boreholes were advanced using a Mobil B-61 drill-rig equipped with 8-inch outside diameter hollow-stem augers. A representative of Sladden was onsite to log the materials encountered and retrieve samples for laboratory testing and engineering analysis.

During our field investigation a mantle of disturbed soil was encountered throughout the site to an approximate depth of two (2) feet below the existing ground surface. Underlying the fill soil and extending to the maximum depth explored, native alluvium was encountered. The site soil consists of interbedded silty sand (SM), sand (SW/SP) and minor proportions of sandy silt (ML) and sandy clay (CL).

Generally, the native earth materials appeared grayish brown to yellowish brown, dry to wet and loose with blow counts indicating that density generally increases with depth.

The final logs represent our interpretation of the contents of the field logs, and the results of the laboratory observations and tests of the field samples. The final logs are included in Appendix A of this report. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types although the transitions may be gradual and variable across the site.

Groundwater was encountered during our field investigation at a depth of approximately 49 Feet bgs within BH-1. Based on our exploratory bores and our review of groundwater level data (CDWR, 2021), groundwater should not be a factor during construction of the proposed project.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 4

SEISMICITY AND FAULTING
Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
The southwestern United States is a tectonically active and structurally complex region, dominated by northwest trending dextral faults. The faults of the region are often part of complex fault systems, composed of numerous subparallel faults which splay or step from main fault traces. Strong seismic shaking could be produced by any of these faults during the design life of the proposed project.

We consider the most significant geologic hazard to the project to be the potential for moderate to strong seismic shaking that is likely to occur during the design life of the project. The proposed project is located in the highly seismic Southern California region within the influence of several fault systems that are considered to be active or potentially active. An active fault is defined by the State of California as a 0 sufficiently active and well defined fault" that has exhibited surface displacement within the Holocene epoch (about the last 11,000 years). A potentially active fault is defined by the State as a fault with a history of movement within Pleistocene time (between 11,000 and 1.6 million years ago). The southwestern portion of the site is located within a State of California delineated fault zone (CDMG, 1980).

As previously stated, the site has been subjected to strong seismic shaking related to active faults that traverse through the region. Some of the more significant seismic events near the subject site within recent times include: M6.0 North Palm Springs (1986), M6.l Joshua Tree (1992), M7.3 Landers (1992), M6.2 Big Bear (1992), M7.1 Hector Mine (1999), and M7.l Ridgecrest (2019).

Table 1 lists the closest known potentially active faults that was generated in part using the EQFAULT computer program (Blake, 2000), as modified using the fault parameters from The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps (Cao et al, 2003), Southern Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC, 2021) and the Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States (USGS, 2021a). This table does not identify the probability of reactivation or the on-site effects from earthquakes occurring on any of the other faults in the region.

TABLEl

CLOSEST KNOWN ACTIVE FAUL TS
Fault Name
Distance Maximum
(Km) Event
San Jacinto -San Jacinto Valley 0.0* 7.38
San Jacinto -Anza 10.0 7.2
Elsinore-Temecula 3.08 6.8
San Jacinto - San Bernardino 27.4 6.7
San Andreas - Southern 32.8 7.2
San Andreas - San Bernardino 32.8 7.5
Elsinore - Glen Ivy 39.6 6.8
Elsinore - Julian 51.1 7.1
*Project site is partially located within a State of California delineated fault zone.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 5 Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028

SITE SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS
Sladden has reviewed the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) and ASCE7-16 and developed site specific ground motion parameters for the subject site. The project Seismic Design Maps and site-specific ground motion parameters are summarized in the following table and included within Appendix C. The project Structural Engineer should verify that all design parameters provided are applicable for the subject project.

TABLE2

GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS
Latitude / Longitude 33.7900/-116.9877
Risk Category II
Site Class D
Code Reference Documents ASCE 7-16; Chapter 11 & 21
Description Type Map Based Site-Specific
MCER Ground Motion (0.2 second period) Ss 2.184 ---
MCfa Ground Motion (1.0 second period) S1 0.887 ---
Site-Modified Spectral Acceleration Value SMs 2.184 2.439 Site-Modified Spectral Acceleration Value SM1 Null 2.547 Numeric Seismic Design Value at 0.2 second SA Sos 1.456 1.626 Numeric Seismic Design Value at 1.0 second SA Sm Null 1.698 Site Amplification Factor at 0.2 second Fa 1 1
Site Amplification Factor at 1.0 second Fv Null 1.7
Site Peak Ground Acceleration PGAM 1.088 0.964

GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
The subject site is located in an active seismic zone and will likely experience strong seismic shaking during the design life of the proposed project. In general, the intensity of ground shaking will depend on several factors including: the distance to the earthquake focus, the earthquake magnitude, the response characteristics of the underlying materials, and the quality and type of construction. Geologic hazards and their relationship to the site are discussed below.

I. Surface Rupture. Surface rupture is expected to occur along preexisting, known active fault traces. However, surface rupture could potentially splay or step from known active faults or rupture along unidentified traces. Based on our review of CDMG (1980), Jennings (1994), Dibblee (2003), RCPR (2021) and our previous work of the sul;,ject property (Sladden, 2003), the southwestern portion of the property is located within a State of California delineated fault zone (Figure 4). Sladden (2003) evaluated that portion of the site by fault trenching and established a restricted use zone (RUZ) of 50 feet (Figure 5). In accordance with current guidelines, no structures intended for human occupancy should be constructed within the previously established RUZ.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 6 Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
IL
III.

IV.

VI.

VII.

Ground Shaking. The site has been subjected to past ground shaking by faults that traverse through the region. Strong seismic shaking from nearby active faults is expected to produce strong seismic shaking during the design life of the proposed project. Based on site-specific ground motion parameters developed for the property (Appendix C), the site modified peak ground acceleration (PGAm) is estimated to be 0.964g.

Liquefaction/ Dry Sand Settlement. Liquefaction is the process in which loose, saturated granular soil loses strength as a result of cyclic loading. The strength loss is a result of a decrease in granular sand volume and a positive increase in pore pressures. Generally, liquefaction can occur if all of the following conditions apply; liquefaction-susceptible soil, groundwater within a depth of 50 feet or less, and strong seismic shaking.

We have performed liquefaction calculations utilizing a magnitude of 7.38 (BSSC, 2013) and rnodified peak ground acceleration of 0.964g. Historic high and anticipated high groundwater depths were determined to be approximately 49 feet bgs. Calculations indicate potential total seismic settlements of up to 7.25 inches and 6.36 inches for BH-1 and BH-4, respectively. Based on the general uniformity of the site soil conditions as demonstrated by the similarity between bores, we expect that differential settlement should be less than 1-inch over a horizontal distance of approximately 100 feet. The seismic settlement calculations are included within Appendix D
Tsunamis and Seiches. Because the site is situated at an inland location and is not immediately. adjacent to any impounded bodies of water, risks associated with tsunamis and seiches are considered "negligible".

Slope Failure, Landsliding, Rock Falls. Slope instability in the form of landslides and rock falls were not observed at or near the subject site. The site is situated on relatively flat ground and is not located immediately adjacent to any slopes. As such, risks associated with slope instability (landslides, mass wasting and rock falls) are considered "negligible".

Expansive Soil. Generally, the surface soil consists of interbedded silty sand (SM), sand (SP/SW), sandy silt (ML) and sandy clay (CL). Based on the results of our laboratory testing (EI=l6), the materials underlying the site are considered to have a "low" expansion potential.

Static Settlement. Static settlement resulting from the anticipated foundation loads should be minimal provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in foundation design and construction. The ultimate static settlement is expected to be less than 1 inch when using the recommended allowable bearing pressures. As a practical matter, differential static settlement between footings can be assumed as one-half of the total settlement.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 7 Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
VIII. Subsidence. Land subsidence can occur in valleys where aquifer systems have been subjected to extensive groundwater pumping, such that groundwater pumping exceeds groundwater recharge. Generally, pore water reduction can result in a rearrangement of skeletal grains and could result in elastic (recoverable) or inelastic (unrecoverable) deformation of an aquifer system. Locally, no fissures or other surficial evidence of subsidence were observed at or near the subject site.

IX. Debris Flows. Debris flows are viscous flows consisting of poorly sorted mixtures of sediment and water and are generally initiated on slopes steeper than approximately six horizontal to one vertical (6H:1V) (Boggs, 2001). Based on the flat nature of the site and the composition of the surface soil, we judge that risks associated with debris flows should be considered remote.

X. Flooding and Erosion. No signs of flooding or erosion were obs~rved during our field investigation. Risks associated with flooding and erosion should be evaluated and mitigated by the project design Civil Engineer.

CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of our investigation, it is our professional opinion that the project should be feasible from a geotechnical perspective provided that the recommendations included in this report are incorporated into foundation design and carried out through construction. The main geotechnical concerns in the design and construction of the proposed project include the presence of artificial fill soil, the loose condition of the near surface native soil, the potential liquefaction related seismic settlements and the presence of a State of California delineated fault zone within the southwestern corner of the site.

Some of the near surface soil underlying the site is considered loose, potentially compressible and not suitable for support of shallow foundations or concrete slabs in the existing condition. Because of the somewhat loose and potentially compressible condition of some of the near surface soil, remedial grading including over-excavation and re-compaction is recommended for the proposed new building and foundation areas. We recommend that remedial grading within the proposed new building areas include over-excavation and re-compaction of the primary foundation bearing soil. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Earthwork and Grading section of this report.

Groundwater was encountered within our bores at a depth of approximately 49 feet bgs. Based on the depth to groundwater, we do not expect the presence of groundwater to impact the proposed development of the property.

As previously stated, the project site is partially located within a State of California delineated fault zone (Figure 4). Previous geologic investigations were conducted on the property to evaluate the active surface rupture potential on the subject property. Based on the Sladden (2003) investigation and City of San Jacinto approval, a restricted use zone (RUZ) of 50 feet was established from the southwestern property corner. In accordance with the Sladden (2003) investigation and current guidelines, structures intended for human occupancy should not be constructed within the RUZ.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 8 Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
Caving did occur to varying degrees within each of our exploratory bores and the surface soil may be susceptible to caving within deeper excavations. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with the normal CalOSHA excavation criteria. Based on our observations of the materials encountered, we anticipate that the subsoil will conform to that described by CalOSHA as Type C. Soil conditions should be verified in the field by a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor.

The following preliminary design recommendations present more detailed design criteria that have been developed based on our field and laboratory investigation.

EARTHWORK AND GRADING
All earthwork including excavation, backfill and preparation of the primary foundation and/or slab bearing soil should be performed in accordance with the geotechnical recommendations presented in this report and portions of the local regulatory requirements, as applicable. All earthwork should be performed under the observation and testing of a qualified soil engineer. The following geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed project are based on observations from the field investigation program, laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering analyses. a. Stripping: Areas to be graded and paved should be cleared of any existing surface improvements, vegetation, root systems and debris. All areas scheduled to receive fill should be cleared of old fills and any irreducible matter. The unsuitable material should be removed off site or stockpiled for later use in landscape areas. Voids left by obstructions should be properly backfilled in accordance with the compaction recommendations of this report. b. Preparation of Building Areas: In order to achieve firm and uniform foundation bearing conditions and to help mitigate potential seismic settlements, we recommend over-excavation and re-compaction throughout the proposed building areas. All artificial fill soil and low density near surface native soil should be removed to a depth of at least 5 feet below existing grade or 5 feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. Remedial grading should extend laterally, a minimum of five feet beyond the building perimeter where possible. The native soil exposed by over-excavation should be scarified, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction prior to all placement. The previously removed soil may then be replaced as engineered fill as recommended below. c. Compaction: Soil to be used as engineered fill should be free of organic material, debris, and other deleterious substances, and should not contain irreducible matter greater than three inches in maximum dimension. All fill materials should be placed in thin lifts, not exceeding six inches in a loose condition. If import fill is required, the material should be of a low to non-expansive nature and should meet the following criteria:

Plastic Index
Liquid Limit
Percent Soil Passing #200 Sieve
Maximum Aggregate Size
Less than 12
Less than 35
Between 15% and 35%
3 inches
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 9 Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
The subgrade and all fill should be compacted with acceptable compaction equipment, to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The bottom of the exposed subgrade should be observed by a representative of Sladden Engineering prior to fill placement. Compaction testing should be performed on all lifts in order to ensure proper placement of the fill materials. Table 3 provides a summary of the excavation and compaction recommendations.

TABLE3

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
*Remedial Grading Over-excavation and re-compaction within the building envelope and extending laterally 5 feet beyond the building limits and to a minimum depth of 5 feet below existing grade or 5 feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper.

Native/ Import Place in thin lifts not exceeding 6 inches in a loose condition, at Engineered Fill near optimum moisture content and compact to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction.

Asphalt Concrete Sections Compact the top 12 inches to at least 95 percent compaction at near optimum moisture content.
* Actual depth may vary and should be determined by a representative of Sladden Engineering in the field during construction.
c. Shrinkage and Subsidence: Volumetric shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate that this shrinkage should be between 10 and 20 percent. Subsidence of the surfaces that are scarified and compacted should be between 1 tenth and 2 tenths of a foot. This will vary depending upon the type of equipment used, the moisture content of the soil at the time of grading and the actual degree of compaction attained.

CONVENTIONAL SHALLOW SPREAD FOOTINGS
Conventional spread footings may be utilized for building support, provided the potential seismic related settlements of approximately 1.0 inch over a horizontal distance of approximately 100 feet can be adequately mitigated in design. All footings should be founded upon properly compacted engineered fill soil and should have a minimum embedment depth of 12 inches measured from the lowest adjacent finished grade. Continuous and isolated footings should have minimum widths of 12 inches and 24 inches, respectively. Continuous and isolated footings placed on compact engineered fill soil may be designed using allowable (net) bearing pressures of 1800 and 2000 pounds per square foot (psf), respectively. Allowable increases of 200 psf for each additional 1 foot of width and 250 psf for each additional 6 inches of depth may be used, if desired. The maximum allowable bearing pressure should be 3000 psf.

The allowable bearing pressures apply to combined dead and sustained live loads. The allowable bearing pressures may be increased by one-third when considering transient live loads, including seismic and wind forces. All footings should be reinforced in accordance with the project structural engineer's recommendations.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 10 Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
Lateral load resistance for the spread footings will be developed by passive soil pressure against the sides of the footings below grade and by friction acting at the base of the concrete footings bearing on compacted fill. An allowable passive pressure of 250 psf per foot of depth may be used for design purposes. An allowable coefficient of friction 0.40 may be used for dead and sustained live loads to compute the frictional resistance of footings placed directly on compacted fill. Under seismic and wind loading conditions, the passive pressure and frictional resistance may be increased by one-third.

All footing excavations should be observed by a representative of Sladden Engineering to verify adequate embedment depths prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete. The excavations should be trimmed neat, level and square. All loose, disturbed, sloughed or moisture-softened soil and/or any construction debris should be removed prior to concrete placement.

PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN
Asphalt concrete pavements should be designed in accordance with Topic 608 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual based on R-Value and Traffic Index. An R-Value of 40 was assumed to develop the following preliminary pavement design section. For preliminary design, a Traffic Index (TI) of 6.5 was used for the on-site roadways. We assumed Asphalt Concrete (AC) over Class II Aggregate Base (AB).

The preliminary flexible pavement design is as follows:

ON-SITE ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION LA YER THICKNESS
Pavement Material Recommended Thickness
TI= 6.5
Asphalt Concrete Surface Course 3.0 inches
Class II Aggregate Base Course 6.0 inches
Compacted Subgrade Soil 12.0 inches
Asphalt concrete should conform with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ("Greenbook") or CalTrans. Class II aggregate base should conform to Greenbook or Caltrans Standard Specifications. The aggregate base material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method D 1557.

SLABS-ON-GRADE
In order to provide uniform and adequate support, concrete slabs-on-grade must be placed on properly compacted engineered fill soil as outlined in the previous sections of this report. The slab subgrade should remain near optimum moisture content and should not be permitted to dry prior to concrete placement. Slab subgrade should be firm and unyielding. Disturbed soil should be removed and replaced with engineered fill soil compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction.

Slab thickness and reinforcement should be determined by the Structural Engineer. We recommend a minimum slab thickness of 5.0 inches and minimum reinforcement of #3 bars at 24 inches on center in both directions to help mitigate potential seismic settlements. All slab reinforcement should be supported on concrete chairs to ensure that reinforcement is placed at slab mid-height. Final floor slab design and reinforcement should be determined by the Structural Engineer.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 ,11 Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
Slabs with moisture sensitive surfaces should be underlain with a moisture vapor retarder consisting of a polyvinyl chloride membrane such as 10-mil visqueen, or equivalent. All laps within the membrane should be sealed and at least 2 inches of clean sand should be placed over the membrane to promote uniform curing of the concrete. To reduce the potential for punctures, the membrane should be placed on a pad surface that has been graded smooth without any sharp protrusions. If a smooth surface can not be achieved by grading, consideration should be given to placing a 1-inch thick leveling course of sand across the pad surface prior to placement of the membrane.

RETAINING WALLS
Minor retaining walls may be required to accomplish the proposed construction. Cantilever retaining walls may be designed using "active" pressures. Active pressures may be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 35 pcf for gently sloping (less than 3H:1 V) native backfill soil acting in a triangular pressure distribution with free-draining backfill conditions "At Rest" pressures should be utilized for restrained walls. At rest pressures may be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 55 pcf for native backfill soil with level free-draining backfill conditions. These lateral pressures should also be applicable for use in swimming pool design.

CORROSION SERIES
The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soil were determined to be 20 parts per million (ppm).

The soil is considered to have a "negligible" corrosion potential with respect to concrete. The use of Type V cement and special sulfate resistant concrete mixes may be necessary. The soluble sulfate content.of the surface soil should be reevaluated after grading.

The Ph levels of the surface soil was 9.1 Based on soluble chloride concentration testing (50 ppm) the soil is considered to have a "low" corrosion potential with respect to normal grade steel. The minimum resistivity of the surface soil was found to be 2330 ohm-cm, which suggests the site soil is considered to have a "moderate" corrosion potential with respect to ferrous metal installations. A corrosion expert should be consulted regarding appropriate corrosion protection measures for corrosion sensitive installations.

UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL
All utility trench backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Trench backfill materials should be placed in lifts no greater than six inches in a loose condition, moisture conditioned ( or air-dried) as necessary to achieve near optimum moisture content, and mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. A representative of the project soil engineer should test the backfill to verify adequate compaction.

EXTERIOR CONCRETE FLATWORK
To provide uniform support and minimize settlement related cracking of concrete flatwork, the subgrade soH within concrete flatwork areas should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction.

A representative of the project geotechnical consultant should observe and verify the density and moisture content of the soil prior to concrete placement.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 12

DRAINAGE
Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
All final grades should be provided with positive gradients away from foundations to provide rapid removal of surface water runoff to an adequate discharge point. No water should be allowed to be pond on or immediately adjacent to foundation elements. In order to reduce water infiltration into the subgrade soil, surface water should be directed away from building foundations to an adequate discharge point. Subgrade drainage should be evaluated upon completion of the precise grading plans and in the field during grading.

LIMITATIONS
The findings and recommendations presented in this report are based upon an interpolation of the soil conditions between the exploratory bore locations and extrapolation of these conditions throughout the proposed building areas. Should conditions encountered during grading appear different than those indicated in this report, this office should be notified.

The use of this report by other parties or for other projects is not authorized. The recommendations of this report are contingent upon monitoring of the grading operation by a representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations are considered to be tentative pending our review of the grading operation and additional testing, if indicated. If others are employed to perform any soil testing, this office should be notified prior to such testing in order to coordinate any required site visits by our representative and to assure indemnification of Sladden Engineering.

We recommend that a pre-job conference be held on the site prior to the initiation of site grading. The purpose of this meeting will be to ensure a complete understanding of the recommendations presented in this report as they apply to the actual grading performed.

ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Once completed, final project plans and specifications should be reviewed by use prior to construction to confirm that the full intent of the recommendations presented herein have been applied to design and construction. Following review of plans and specifications, observation should be performed by the Soil Engineer during construction to document that foundation elements are founded on/or extend into the properly compacted soil, and that suitable backfill soil is placed upon competent materials and properly compacted at the recommended moisture content.

Tests and observations should be performed during grading by the Soil Engineer or his representative in order to verify that the grading is being performed in accordance with the project specifications. Field density testing shall be performed in accordance with acceptable ASTM test methods. The minimum acceptable degree of compaction should be 90 percent for engineered fill soil and 95 percent for Class II aggregate base as obtained by ASTM Test Method D1557. Where testing indicates insufficient density, additional compactive effort shall be applied until retesting indicates satisfactory compaction.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) March 26, 2021 13

REFERENCES
Project No. 644-21013
21-03-028
ASCE7-16, 2016, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures.

Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2013, USGS Earthquake Scenario Map; available at:
https://usgs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=l4d2f75c7c4f4619936dac0d14el e468
California Building Code (CBC), 2019, California Building Standards Commission.

California Department of Water Resources (CDWR), 2021, Historical Data by Well-Map Interface, available at: http://wdl.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary/Home.aspx California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1980, Special Studies Zones Map of the San Jacinto Quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.

Cao T., Bryant, W.A., Rowshandel B., Branum D., Wills C.J., 2003, 0The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps".

Dibblee, T.W., 2003, Geologic Map of the San Jacinto Quadrangle, Riverside Counties, California; DF-118.

GoogleEarth.com, 2021, Vertical Aerial Photograph for the San Jacinto area, California, Undated, Variable Scale.

Jennings, Charles W. (Compiler), 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas, California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map No. 6
Riverside County Parcel Report (RCPR), 2021, available at https:/ /gisl.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/index.html?viewer=MMC_Public Sladden Engineering (2003), Geologic Hazards Evaluation, Tentative Tract 31293, Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California; Project No. 444-3021, Report No. 03-05-317, dated May 19, 2003.

Structural Engineer Association of California (SEAC), 2021, Seismic Design Maps; available at:
https:/ /seismicmaps.org/
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2015, San Jacinto 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Map, 1:24000.

United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2021a, Quaternary Fault and Fold Database; available at:
https:/ / geohazards. us gs.gov /hazards/interactive/
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2021b, Risk-Targeted Ground Motion Calculator; available at:
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/rtgm/
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2021c, Unified Hazard Tool; available at:
https:/ /earthquake.us gs.gov /hazards/interactive/
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

FIGURES

SITE LOCATION MAP

REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP

EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN

FAULT ZONE MAP

RESTRICTED USE ZONE
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) USGS (2015)

SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE
Pro ·ect Number: 644-21002
21-03-030 1
Sladden Engineering Date: March 26, 2021

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

EXPLANATION OF SITE UNITS
SURFlet:AJ.. SlIDTMF..NTS
A t.tu.trial ire"dir;ir..."11.ts, uru:o,a'D~tzii,. lll'idU!$«ted Qg A t}vfsJ' ssr.d &d gmw of maJar sucem chl:m:rcfs
QB ANr.r.;).fi•! ~ tl~ ,tt.1¢'fu,' Q/ l'eyar -~, ~.re-;H~ygray .30i',~ "1!..""l1Uri ' S' {tQm ;;,h:t.--.,w:,J g.rartsl s.m:J s6fld ,\rr .trrcunrairr ares
~- ,~
. . ·~-:·-~;~ -·.·
·,:';' j
. ,., .. ,--i ~
· .....
" ~J-~\ .
·-..

I)
.JJ,.•:
~i •t'-! i, .,
~-~~ ..
'·
' \ 1
'1 '• 1, \
-~.
\ \ J \ ' \
\ .. \ \ \ \, -, •, c ,, '· . ,,
'1 \
T \ \ -
\,'\
. ~
. ?,i/:l
•• 1 i i
!
.- r·---
.. I...__D_i_b_bl_ee_(_2_00_3_) __,
Sladden Engineering
1;
i+•--.
1} ·.
t · ;
;. .,

REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP
Pro·ect Number: 644-21002
21-03-030
Date: March 26, 2021
11 .,.. ,·
\~: \ ·)·~-
,,
·, \ ~
\·-~,,, '··----:.•·,
'\_ ' ..
a
', ..... ~ ~-.. .. , .........
,,
--..,
FIGURE
2 I

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) I . 1-----B_H_-1 __
i I
•
I
t z 2 Qu5
DR-1
zw ffll-2
0 U)
N3/\V NOAl
LEGEND
BH-6 Borehole Location
DR-4 Infiltration Test Location
(/)
(/)
w
u
u >-
<( _J
>- z
uo
z 1- W - C> X
a:: UJ
WO
2Z
w <(

EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN FIGURE
Pro·ect Number: 644-21002
21-03-030
Sladden Engineering Date: March 26, 2021

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Potentially Fll!U!l!!i

FAULT ZONE MAP FIGURE
Pro ·ect Number: 644-21002
21-03-030
Sladden Engineering Date: March 26, 2021

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Sladden (2003

RESTRICTED USE ZONE FIGURE
Pro·ect Number: 644-21002
21-03-030
Sladden Engineering Date: March 26, 2021

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

APPENDIX A

FIELD EXPLORATION
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

APPENDIX A

FIELD EXPLORATION
For our field investigation six (6) exploratory boreholes were excavated on February 16, 2021 utilizing a truck mounted hollow stem auger rig (Mobile B-61). Continuous logs of the materials encountered were made by a representative of Sladden Engineering. Materials encountered in the boreholes were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented in this appendix.

Representative undisturbed samples were obtained within our borings by driving a thin-walled steel penetration sampler (California split spoon sampler) or a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler with a 140 pound automatic-trip hammer dropping approximately 30 inches (ASTM D1586). The number of blows required to drive the samplers 18 inches was recorded in 6-inch increments and blowcounts are indicated on the boring logs.

The California samplers are 3.0 inches in diameter, carrying brass sample rings having inner diameters of

2.5 inches. The standard penetration samplers are 2.0 inches in diameter with an inner diameter of 1.5 inches. Undisturbed samples were removed from the sampler and placed in moisture sealed containers in order to preserve the natural soil moisture content. Bulk samples were obtained from the excavation spoils and samples were then transported to our laboratory for further observations and testing.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com ·

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Q)
t
ro
Cf)
Sladden Engineering
>< Q)
'tJ
j
0 u
:;:
0 co
Q) .E 1 i::
.9 ro Ul Cf} i:: ~ ro
"5 p..
>< i:o p:J
5 6 6 1 16
5 6 7
8 9 10
0 0
N
~
Ul
g
~ ~ 0

22.3 24.7

5.5 Q)
'"" E
Ul ·5
:;;s
?f2.

2.9 3.0

1.8 .......
u
p..
.:§
Ul
i::

Q)
p
106.2

99.5 2
4 6
8 10
12 14

BORELOG
Equipment: MOBILE B-61 Date Drilled: 2/16/2021
Elevation: 1505MSL Boring No: BH-1
Description
/)/ Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, dry to slightly moist, fine- to coarse- ·//} grained with gravel (Fill/Disturbed).
://} Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, dry to slightly moist, loose, fine- to //f coarse-grained with gravel (Qa).
1 i!!i!!!ii! Silty Sand (SM); light grayish brown, dry, loose, fine- to coarse-grained, \/f micaceous (Qa).
lli!lill!!i
/}/ Sand (SP); light grayish brown, dry, medium dense, fine- to coarse- ){{ grained, micaceous (Qa).
6 8 8 6.2 1.9 98.9 16 ):}) Sand (SP); light gray, dry, loose, fine-grained, micaceous (Qa). 5 6 10 31.4 11.5
9 10 11 37.1 14.4
7 9 13 8.2 5.2
10 11 11 30.7 14.5
8 6 6 63.0 25.9
9 13 22 17.1 15.5
10 13 13 36.5 22.4
Completion Notes:

Terminated at ~51.5 Feet bgs.

No Bedrock Encountered.

Groundwater Encountered at 49.0 Feet bgs.
18 20
22 24
110.8
26 28
30 32
34 110.1
36 38
40 42
44 112.7
46 48
50 /n/U Silty Sand (SM); gray, moist, medium dense, fine-grained (Qa). .\\/ Sand (SW); grayish brown, slightly moist, medium dense, fine- to coarse \\/ grained (Qa).
}}\ Silty Sand (SM); light gray, dry, medium dense, fine-grained, micaceous !illJ!!i! I! (Qa).

Sandy Silt (ML); dark grayish brown, moist, stiff, low plasticity (Qa). /\\ Silty Sand (SM); dark grayish brown, very moist to wet, medium dense, ii!!!!l!Jii fine-grruTied, ntlca=us (Qa).
\\/ Silty Sand (SM); dark grayish brown, very moist to wet, medium dense, \\\ fine- rained, micaceous (Qa).

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, 014; SAN JACINTO
Project No: 644-21002 1---=------------------------1 Page 1 Report No: 21-03-030

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Sladden
~ Engineering
>< Q)
'"O 0 Cl) Q) .s 0
~ N 4--< } ~ 'ict Q) u ;:l ... p.. 0 .9 Cl) .8 i- Q) u ro Cl) ;:l Cl) p... Cf) ~ ~ ·s "lii ;S'. 1 ro 8 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Q) ro
Cf) i:o p:i P:l ~ ?/2. p 0
5 6 8 44.2 4.9 94.4
=c 8 10 13 16.9 3.0
9 10 13 56.3 6.0 98.1
Completion Notes:

BORE LOG
Equipment: MOBILE B-61 I Date Drilled: 2/16/2021
Elevation: 1505MSL j Boring No: BH-2
@
0 0 ~ ,E Q)
Q) ;.:3 e::, u
,E ~ p.. p.. ro Q) ...

Description
p c.,
:(/\ Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, dry to slightly moist, fine- to coarse- .... - }// grained with gravel (Fill/Disturbed) . .... 2~~~~----~-~----~---------------. : ·Jlililill '- 6 _ /j\ Silty Sand (SM); mottled reddish brown and light grayish brown, dry to ,... _ /// slightly moist, loose, fine- to coarse-grained (Qa). ::Jillliill
-<H\ Silty Sand (SM); light gray, dry, medium dense, fine- to coarse-grained, ~ :: ; l!!ill)l/1 ri~reous.
.... ::::::::::: Sand (SP); light gray, slightly moist, medium dense, fine-grained, .... 16- ..... . ,_ ::::::::::: micaceous (Qa).
,_ 18-
'- 20-
- 22-
'- 24-
- 26-
,_ 28-
'- 30-
,_ 32-
,_ 34-
- 36-
- 38-
- 40-
f-- 42-
- 44-
'- 46-
f-- -
,_ 48-
,_ 50-
Terminated at~ 16.5 Feet bgs.

No Bedrock Encountered.

No Groundwater or Seepage Encountered.

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, 014; SAN JACINTO
Project No: 644-21002 I I 1-R-e~po_r_t_N_o_: --2-1--0-3--0-30 ___________ 1 Page 2

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Cg) Equipment:

BORELOG
MOBILE B-61 I Date Drilled: 2/16/2021
Sladden
ig (!)
p.. ;::1
0 s (!) u ro p.. Cl)
~ s
ro 0 ~ CJ) E5 p:::i
6 8 11
[C 4 3 3
6 8 9
Completion Notes:

Engineering Elevation: 1505MSL I Boring No: BH-3
>< (!)
'"d
.E
~
.9
en
~
ro

0...
>< p::J
0 0
C's! ..... ~ (!) u I-< 0... en .8 a .f en
·s ~ en ~ ~ (!)
?ft. ::::g
0 0

2.8 2.2
>-.
bO
0 0 -:.:;- ,:S (!)
(!) ;.J
c u
,:S ~ 0... 0... ro (!) I-<
Description
0 CJ
/)) Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, dry to slightly moist, fine- to coarse- .... - )// grained with gravel (Fill/Disturbed). ,-... 2 ..... . - 4 -
- -
.....
.. ... .
_ 6 _ Sand (SP); light gray, dry to slightly moist, loose, fine- to coarse- - _ ...... grained, micaceous (Qa) . . ... . . .... .
- 8 - .....
. ... . . .... . . . .... ... .. . . .. .. .. .. . -10 ..... .

2.2 2.0 106.4 ,-... _. . . . . . Sand (SW); light gray, dry, medium dense, fine- to coarse-grained (Qa).

87.0 35.3

44.7 15.2
.....
. . . ..
-12- .....
. ... .. ... . .
>--14- .....
,._ 16-
._ 18-
. . . .. . ...... ·····
Sandy Silt (ML); greenish gray, moist, medium stiff, low plasticity (Qa). - 20.+.J,: ,J.,.L,JL,-J,-4----------------------------1

92.5 : \} Silty Sand (SM); mottled grayish brown and yellowish brown, moist, - - }} medium dense, fine-grained (Qa). -n-+-~~------'---"'----'-.C....:.--------------1 - 24-
- 26-
,-... 28-
.... 30-
,._ 32-
- 34-
- 36-
- 38-
- 40-
- 42-
.... 44-
,._ 48-
1- 50-
Terminated at ~21.5 Feet bgs.

No Bedrock Encountered.

No Groundwater or Seepage Encountered.

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, 014; SAN JACINTO
1--P_ro--"-je_c_t _N_o_: __ 644-_2_1_00_2 __________ --1 1 1 Page I 3 Report No: 21-03-030

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) (§) BORE LOG
Date Drilled: 2/16/2021
Sladden Engineering
Equipment: MOBILE B-61 l
Elevation: 1505 MSL T Boring No: BH-4
X
QJ
'"Cl
2 QJ .s i::
;:! } i::
0 .9 QJ u ell V)
1 Cl) i::
~ ,.\t:, ell
P. ell ..9 '"5 X U) i:o P'.:l i:iJ
7 8 9
10 13 15
Is 8 10
16 21 31
tI 11 14 14
7 14 25
tI 3 5 8
8 11 21
Completion Notes:

Terminated at ~51.5 Feet bgs.

No Bedrock Encountered.
0 0
N
~ QJ
I-<
V) E g V)
·o ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~

2.2 1.8

1.3 1.1

54.6 8.6

1.9 0.7

12.3 6.7

4.6 2.0

4.5 2.1

42.9 15.5

62.1 23.7

79.0 29.2
No Groundwater or Seepage Encountered.
""" u
P.
.f
V)
i::

QJ
0 Description
\ HH Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, dry to slightly moist, fine- to coarse- - -rt\ grained with gravel (Fill/Disturbed). -2~~--=-----=---"-------"--------------1 :
4 )1\l!lil!II
,_ 6 _ \}\ Silty Sand (SM); yellowish brown, slightly moist, loose, fine- to coarse- ~
1 : = !ll!il!llil ~•ffied, micaceous (Qa).
'-- _ {{{ Sand (SW); light gray, dry, medium dense, fine- to coarse-grained (Qa). '- 12- :-:-:-:-:-:
,_ 14- -:-:-:-:-:-:
,- 16-
'-- 18-
- 20 .....

Sandy Silt (ML); grayish brown, slightly moist, stiff, low plasticity, micaceous (Qa).
109.9 _ -){) Sand (SP); yellowish brown, dry, medium dense, fine- to coarse-grained - 22- ::::::::::: (Qa).
-24-.-:-:-:-:-:-
- 6 \\} Silty Sand (SM); light gray, dry to slightly moist, medium dense, fine- to - 2 - :::::::::::
: m = 11111111111 coarn~~•ined (Qa).
,_ 30 ··:=:·:·::::
106.6 _ _ }\/ Sand (SW); light grayish brown, dry, dense, fine- to coarse-grained, _ 32 _ }}) micaceous (Qa).
._ 36 _ /)) Sand (SW); yellowish brown, dry, medium dense, fine- to coarse- .... _\/\grained, micaceous (Qa).
,- 38 - : ·:-: ·: ·:-:
'-- 40 · ·.· · · ·
112.9 \}) Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, moist, medium dense, fine-grained, ~ : ~ 11111111111 Wcacoous (~).
.... 46-
.... 48-
... so98.0
Sandy Silt (ML); grayish brown, moist, stiff, low plasticity, micaceous (Qa) .

Sandy Silt (ML); grayish brown, moist, very stiff, low plasticity, micaceous (Qa).

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, 014; SAN JACINTO
,_P_ro...aj_ec_t_N_o_: __ 6_44_-_2_10_0_2 __________ ----1 1 1 Page I 4 Report No: 21-03-030

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) (§)
Sladden Engineering
>< Q)
"'d 0 U) Q) ~ 0
§ N ...... p.. ~ Q) u i:: i-.. 0... 0 s 0 ti) .B f Q) u ell .Uj ;:i ti) t Cf)
~ i:: ·s ;s: ~ ~ ::;s ti)

0... i:: 0 "5 Q) ro E5 >< CJ) i:a µJ ;::;g ;::;g p 0 0
5 5 8 20.9 2.4 97.3
Is 5 5 3.5 2.0
4 6 9 63.2 21.9 87.8
I3 5 6 65.9 19.0
Completion Notes:

BORE LOG
Equipment: MOBILE B-61 r Date Drilled: 2/16/2021
Elevation: 1505MSL j Boring No: BH-5
5'i3
0 0 ~ ,:B
81 ;.:3 f::!, u
,B i 0... ro Q) i-..

Description
p C)
\)n Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, dry to slightly moist, fine- to coarse- ,_ - './}\ grained with gravel (Fill/Disturbed). ,-2~--~----~-------------------- :. =
1 IJ/lilill _ 6 _///! Silty Sand (SM); light grayish brown, dry, loose, fine- to coarse-grained, j :0 = l!!iillllll rica~oos (Qa).
._ __ : Sand (SW); yellowish brown, dry to slightly moist, loose, fine- to coarse- ._ 12 __ ; _____ grained, micaceous (Qa) . ... . . . . . .. . . . ... . .. ... . . ... . .. . .. . .... 14- :_ ....
,_ 16-
._ 18-
I- -
- 20-
. . ... . .....
. .....

Sandy Silt (ML); yellowish brown, moist, stiff, low plasticity (Qa).

Sandy Silt (ML); grayish brown, moist, stiff, low plasticity, micaceous -n____._.L-L.-L-_(_Q~a)_. _________________ _
'- 24-
,_ 26-
._ 28-
- 30-
>- 32-
._ 34-
- 36-
- 38-
- 40-
- - - 42-
f- 44-
,_ 48-
,_ 50-
Terminated at -21.5 Feet bgs.

No Bedrock Encountered.

No Groundwater or Seepage Encountered.

Project No:

Report No:

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, 014; SAN JACINTO
644-21002 I p I S
I age 21-03-030

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ® BORE LOG
Equipment: Date Drilled:

Sladden Engineering Elevation:

MOBILE B-61 I 2/16/2021
1505 MSL I Boring No: BH-6
X
(l)
'"d (/) (l) .5 1:: 0.. ;:I ~
0 s .8 (l) u CCI (/)

0.. Cf) ~
~ ~ CCI s 0 p... CCI l:o ;:I X CJ) i:o ~
7 11 15
[C 5 4 4
9 15 19
Completion Notes:
0 0
N ....... ~ (l) u 1-c p... (/) .E 2 § (/)
·s ~ ~ (/)
~
cf2. (l) ::::!:: 0 Cl

2.7 1.4
>-,
bO
0 0 -:.:;-- ii (l)
(l) ;::3 e::, u
ii ~ p... p... CCI (l) 1-c
Description
Cl c.,
\)\ Silty Sand (SM); grayish brown, dry to slightly moist, fine- to coarse- ._ - }\/ grained with gravel (Fill/Disturbed). I- 2 ..... . - 4 -
... .. . . . . . .
......
.....
. .. . . .
_ 6 _ Sand (SW); yellowish brown, dry, loose, fine- to coarse-grained, i- _ ;.;.:.;.;.: micaceous (Qa) . .. . .. . .....
._ 8 - .....
i-10-
... .. . . . ... ......
. ... .. .....
. .. . ..

2.1 0.4 103.4 ..... _ Sand (SW); grayish brown, dry, medium dense, fine- to coarse-grained,

92.5 25.3

32.5 4.6
_ 12 _ ..... micaceous (Qa) . .. .. . . . . .. .
._ 14- ..... . ......
... .. ... . ..
._ 16 ~~ Sandy Clay (CL); mottled grayish brown and yellowish brown, moist, ._ -~ W,..1 t 1/,/'/ medium stiff, low plasticity (Qa). I- - /, '..I j, '..I - 18-" ~ .,~ ~., ~ ;.; ._ -~,., ://
, '/1/~ 1- 20 / .. / ...
105.3 >>> Silty Sand (SM); yellowish brown, slighlty moist, medium dense, fine- : 22 - \\/ grained, micaceous (Qa).
._ 26-
..... 28-
1- 30-
..... 32-
- 34-
1- 36-
- 38-
- - ,- 40-
I- 42-
.... 44-
..... 46-
..... 48-
I- -
,_ 50-
Terminated at -21.5 Feet bgs.

No Bedrock Encountered.

No Groundwater or Seepage Encountered .

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, 014; SAN JACINTO
1-P_ro--=-je_c_t_N_o_: __ 6_44_-_21_0_0_2 __________ -1II Pagel Report No: 21-03-030 6

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

APPENDIXB

LABORATORY TESTING
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

APPENDIXB

LABORATORY TESTING
Representative bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained in the field and returned to our laboratory for additional observations and testing. Laboratory testing was generally performed in two phases. The first phase consisted of testing in order to determine the compaction of the existing natural soil and the general engineering classifications of the soils underlying the site. This testing was performed in order to estimate the engineering characteristics of the soil and to serve as a basis for selecting samples for the second phase of testing. The second phase consisted of soil mechanics testing.

This testing including consolidation, shear strength and expansion testing was performed in order to provide a means of developing specific design recommendations based on the mechanical properties of the soil.

CLASSIFICATION AND COMPACTION TESTING
Unit Weight and Moisture Content Determinations: Each undisturbed sample was weighed and measured in order to determine its unit weight. A small portion of each sample was then subjected to testing in order to determine its moisture content. This was used in order to determine the dry density of the soil in its natural condition. The results of this testing are shown on the Boring Logs.

Maximum Density-Optimum Moisture Determinations: Representative soil types were selected for maximum density determinations. This testing was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard D1557-91, Test Method A. Graphic representations of the results of this testing are presented in this appendix. The maximum densities are compared to the field densities of the soil in order to determine the existing relative compaction to the soil.

Classification Testing: Soil samples were selected for classification testing. This testing consists of mechanical grain size analyses. This provides information for developing classifications for the soil in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented in the preceding appendix.

This classification system categorizes the soil into groups having similar engineering characteristics. The results of this testing is very useful in detecting variations in the soil and in selecting samples for further testing.

SOIL MECHANIC'S TESTING
Expansion Testing: One (1) bulk sample was selected for Expansion testing. Expansion testing was performed in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2. This testing consists of remolding 4-inch diameter by 1-inch thick test specimens to a moisture content and dry density corresponding to approximately 50 percent saturation. The samples are subjected to a surcharge of 144 pounds per square foot and allowed to reach equilibrium. At that point the specimens are inundated with distilled water. The linear expansion is then measured until complete.

Direct Shear Testing: One (1) bulk sample was selected for Direct Shear testing. This test measures the shear strength of the soil under various normal pressures and is used to develop parameters for foundation design and lateral design. Tests were performed using a recompacted test specimen that was saturated prior to tests. Tests were performed using a strain controlled test apparatus with normal pressures ranging from 800 to 2300 pounds per square foot.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Consolidation/Hydro-Collapse Testing: One (1) relatively undisturbed sample was selected for consolidation testing. For this test, a one-inch thick test specimen was subjected to vertical loads varying from 575 psf to 11520 psf applied progressively. The consolidation at each load increment was recorded prior to placement of each subsequent load.

Corrosion Series Testing: The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soil were determined in accordance with California Test Method Number (CA) 417. The pH and Minimum Resistivity were determined in accordance with CA 643. The soluble chloride concentrations were determined in accordance with CA 422.

Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) @f8) Sladden Engineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Project Number:

Project Name:

Lab ID Number:

Sample Location:

Description:

Maximum Density:

Optimum Moisture:
145
140
135
130
c...
~ 125 Q.
i
r;')
= a)
~ 120
C'
~
115
110
105
100
0 Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture
ASTM D698/D1557
644-21002
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
BH-1 Bulk 1 @ 0-5'
Dark Brown Silty Sand (SM)
124.5 pcf
10%
Sieve Size
3/4"
3/8"
#4
\. \. \
\ \ i\ \ \ \
\ ... \
\ \ ... \. \.
\. ~ \.
\. \.
\. \.
\.
\.
,, ,,,, ,
itl
% Retained

0.2 ...
\.
\. <--- Zero Air Voids Lines, '\. \.
... \. '\. sg =2.65, 2.70, 2.75
\. ... \.
\. '\. ' " '\. \.
'\. \. \
'\ '\. '\.

I\. ' '\.
'\. '\.
'\. '\.
- '\. -....._,._ \ '' '\. \.
' '\. ' '\.
' '\. '\. \.
' '\. '\. '\. 1, '\.
"la ' "' '\. '\.
' 1'..'\. "' '1, ' .. "'-' '\. '\. I\:. 1, .... I,,.'
March 23, 2021
ASTMD-1557 A
Rammer Type: Machine
'\. ' I\:. I'-." r..., ........ ,,
I'\. " '\.
'\. ''\.
' ,,
'' ' ' I\:.,
.............. ........
' ,,
,,
""-'
'-.."
5 10 15 20 25
Moisture Content, %
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) (@§) Sladden Engineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Expansion Index
ASTMD4829
Job Number: 644-21002
Job Name: Lyon Avenue
Lab ID Number: LN6-21087
Sample ID: BH-1 Bulk 1 @ 0-5'
Soil Description: Dark Brown Silty Sand (SM)
Wt of Soil + Ring: 581.3
Weight of Ring: 191.1
Wt of Wet Soil: 390.2
Percent Moisture: 8.3%
Sample Height in 0.95
Wet Density, pcf: 124.9
Dry Denstiy, pcf: 115.3
I% Saturation: 48.6
Expansion Rack# 3
Date/Time
Initial Reading
Final Reading
Expansion Index
(Final - Initial) x 1000
3/22/2021 I

0.0000

0.0159
3:15 PM
16 Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet
March 23, 2021

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ~ Sladden Engineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Job Number:

Job Name
Lab ID No.
644-21002
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
Direct Shear ASTM D 3080-04
(modified for unconsolidated condition)
Sample ID BH-1 Bulk 1 @ 0-5'
Classification Dark Brown Silty Sand (SM)
Sample Type Remolded@ 90% of Maximum Density
Test Results 1 2 3
Moisture Content, % 18.8 18.8 18.8
Saturation, % 100.3 100.3 100.3
Normal Stress, kps 0.739 1.479 2.958
Peak Stress, kps 0.676 1.155 2.027
• Peak Stress -Linear (Peak Stress)
March 23, 2021
Initial Dry Density: 111.9 pcf
Initial Mosture Content: 9.8 %
Peak Friction Angle (0): 31 °
Cohesion (c): 260 psf
4 Average

18.8 18.8
100.3 100.3

5.916

3.771

6.0 -,---,-----,----,---,...--,--,--...--.....--,-----,---,----,...---,--,--..---,---.---,---,-----,----,.-.....--r---,

5.0 +---+---+---+---+----+-~-t--+---+---+---+---+----+-t----+---t---+---+---+---+---+-t---+---t ,£
rl'l --- Q,>
.;: 3.0 --t----+--+----+----+--+----jl-----l---+--+--+----+----+--1--1----+---+--+--::ba--"'"""'f------+--+-l-----t-------t rJ'1
i..
~
~ 2, 0 +---+---+---+---+---4--1---+---+--+---+--+:::..-'l""F----+-!----+--+----+---+--+---+---+-i---+---l rJ'1

1. 0 +---+----+--+--+-__.----=-"'~-+----+---+----+---+--+---4------,i---+---+--+---+---+--+---+-----,--1---1

0.0 _ _.__..........._ -- ________________ ...__ __ ..........._ _______________ _ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Normal Stress, kps
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) la den ngineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Project Number:

Project Name:

Lab ID Number:

Sample ID:
-~ ti)
ti)
trj
0-.
'#-
100.0

90.0 80.0

70.0 60.0

50.0 40.0

30.0 20.0

10.0 0.0
100.000
Gradation
ASTM Cll7 & Cl36
644-21002 March 23, 2021
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
BH-1 Bulk 1 @ 0-5' Soil Classification: SM
Sieve Sieve Percent
Size, in Size, mm Passing
2" 50.8 100.0
1 1/2" 38.1 100.0
l" 25.4 100.0
3/4" 19.1 100.0
1/2" 12.7 100.0
3/8" 9.53 100.0
#4 4.75 99.8
#8 2.36 97.8
#16 1.18 91.7
#30 0.60 83.6
#50 0.30 71.0
#100 0.15 54.0
#200 0.075 34.3
A. .. A A
y ~ -...., ~ r-..
" ~~
'\ I'.
).
\
\
\
' \
'
i\
.,

10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001
Sieve Size, mm
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ~ Sladden Engineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Gradation
ASTM CI 17 & Cl36
Project Number: 644-21002 March 23, 2021
Project Name:

Lab ID Number:

Sample ID:
bO
.s
en
C/l
ro
~
~
100
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0
100.000
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
BH-1 R-4@ 15'
A ..
"'
Sieve
Size, in
1"
3/411
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
#16
#30
#50
#100
#200
,. .. V I" ...

10.000
-.,.._
I'-..

Soil Classification: SP-SM
Sieve Percent
Size, mm Passing

25.4 100.0

19.1 100.0

12.7 100.0

9.53 100.0

4.75 100.0

2.36 99.1

1.18 91.8

0.60 71.7

0.30 29.4

0.15 9.4

0.074 6.2
~
"
:,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~
'- ~

1.000 0.100 0.010
Sieve Size, mm
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

0.001

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ladden II II ng1neer1ng
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Project Number:

Project Name:

Lab ID Number:

Sample ID:
...... ~ Cl)
Cl)
ro
~
~
100
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0
100.000
Gradation
ASTM Cl 17 & Cl36
644-21002 March 23, 2021
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
BH-2 R-1 @5' Soil Classification: SM
Sieve Sieve Percent
Size, in Size,mm Passing
1" 25.4 100.0
3/411 19.1 100.0
1/2" 12.7 100.0
3/8" 9.53 100.0
#4 4.75 100.0
#8 2.36 99.8
#16 1.18 97.8
#30 0.60 94.5
#50 0.30 91.4
#100 0.15 80.9
#200 0.074 44.2

A A A A
V ,r V ~
-----... ,... ,-.._
-.......~
" I\.
\
\
\
\
1111

10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001
Sieve Size, mm
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ladden Engineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Project Number:

Project Name:

Lab ID Number:

Sample ID:
bO
0 ·-Cl)
Cf.l
cd
A-;
';f:.
100
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0
100.000
644-21002
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
BH-3 R-2@ 10'
• A
V IV
Sieve
Size, in
A
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
#16
#30
#50
#100
#200
... I"

10.000
~
I\
' \
\
\
\
Gradation
ASTM Cl 17 & Cl36
March 23, 2021
Soil Classification: SW
Sieve Percent
Size, mm Passing

25.4 100.0

19.1 100.0

12.7 100.0

9.53 99.5

4.75 98.4

2.36 79.8

1.18 52.6

0.60 34.6

0.30 14.1

0.15 4.8

0.074 2.2
\
\
\
\
\
I\
r--,
I\
\
\
\
\
I\
\
◄\
"f'..... •
........_ ,..~

1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001
Sieve Size, mm
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ladden II Ill ng1neer1ng
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Project Number:

Project Name:

Lab ID Number:

Sample ID:
...... ~ rl)
rl)
Cid
~
'$.
100
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0
100.000
Gradation
ASTM Cl 17 & C136
644-21002 March 23, 2021
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
BH-4 S-5 @ 25' Soil Classification: SM
Sieve Sieve Percent
Size, in Size, mm Passing
1" 25.4 100.0
3/4" 19.l 100.0
1/2" 12.7 100.0
3/8" 9.53 100.0
#4 4.75 99.9
#8 2.36 96.5
#16 1.18 87.4
#30 0.60 67.3
#50 0.30 33.l
#100 0.15 16.6
#200 0.074 12.3
A A
T V --. ~
I"' \
' " \
\
◄►
\
\
\
'
\
\
\
\
\
~ "'- •

10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001
Sieve Size, mm
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ladden Engineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Project Number:

Project Name:

Lab ID Number:

Sample ID:
bl)
0 ·-IZl
IZl
cd
A-;
~
100
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0
100.000
Gradation
ASTM Cll7 & Cl36
644-21002 March 23, 2021
Lyon Avenue
LN6-21087
BH-5 R-1 @5' Soil Classification: SM
Sieve Sieve Percent
Size, in Size, mm Passing
l" 25.4 100.0
3/4r1 19.1 100.0
1/2" 12.7 100.0
3/8" 9.53 100.0
#4 4.75 99.0
#8 2.36 92.8
#16 1.18 82.0
#30 0.60 68.5
#50 0.30 45.9
#100 0.15 30.6
#200 0.074 20.9
. . . " ,.. ... "''---- ~
I'\.
~
' I\
\
!\
◄\
'
~
\
I\
)~
\
\
\a.
"" ~
r,~

10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001
Sieve Size, mm
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) la den Engineering
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 One Dimensional Consolidation
ASTM D2435 & D5333
Job Number: 644-21002 March 23, 2021
Job Name: Lyon Avenue
Lab ID Number: LN6-21087 Initial Dry Density, pcf: 91.7 Sample ID: BH-2 R-1 @ 5' Initial Moisture, %: 4.9
Soil Description: Dark Gray Brown Silty Sand (SM) Initial Void Ratio: 0.817 Specific Gravity: 2.67
Hydrocollapse: 0.1 % @ 0.702 ksf
% Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram
1 0 A
. -------i---
-1
-2
-3 ......
-= ell -~
= -4
.s
~
bl)
= -5 cc:
-= u
~ -6
-7
-8
-9
-10

0.1 ~ Before Saturation
-e-Rebound
i
i
I
r--i--N L __
~
LO
" ~
"" "
G-- r-
-l!r-After Saturation
---Hydro Consolidation
~ i\
I\
\

1\.1
r--- f\..
~ I
i
l
I
l
I
i
I
i

10.0 Normal Load (kst)
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet
100.0

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ladden Ill 111 ng1neer1ng
450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Job Number: 644-21002
Job Name: Lyon Avenue
One Dimensional Consolidation
ASTM D2435 & D5333
March 23, 2021
Lab ID Number: LN6-21087 Initial Dry· Density, pcf: 110. 7 Sample ID: BH-3 R-2 @ 10' Initial Moisture, %: 2.0
Soil Description: Gray Brown Sand (SW) Initial Void Ratio: 0.506 I
0 A
V
-1
-2
-3 ....
-= bJl .Q)
= -4
.s
~
bJl
= -5 ~
-= u
¢ ~ -6
-7
-8
-9
-10

0.1 Specific Gravity: 2.67
% Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram
~ Before Saturation
-a-Rebound
11111- - l'--t-
~'-

1.0 ~
"'
,..._
-
---e--After Saturation
-II-Hydro Consolidation
I
I
!
i
I"- ~ ', "' "-... LJ[

10.0 Normal Load (ksf)
Buena Park • Palm Desert • Hemet
100.0

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ~ Stadden Engineering
6782 Stanton Ave., Suite A, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369 45090 Golf Center Pkwy, Suite F, Indio CA 92201 (760) 863-0713 Fax (760) 863-0847 450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 Date: March 23, 2021
Account No.: 644-21002
Customer: Richland Developers, Inc.

Location: APNs 436-280-011 & 012, Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto Corrosion Series
pH
per CA 643
BH-1@ 0-5' 9.1
Analytical Report
Soluble Sulfates
per CA 417
ppm
20 Soluble Chloride
perCA422
ppm
50 Min. Resistivity
per CA 643
ohm-cm
2330
C Rpt 644-21002 032321

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

APPENDIXC

SITE-SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Project: APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014; San Jacinto, California Project Number: 644-21002
Client: Richland Developers, Inc.

Site Lat/Long: 33.7900/-116.9877
Controlling Seismic Source: San Jacinto (Casa Loma)

REFERENCE NOTATION VALUE
Site Class C, D, D default, or E D measured
Site Class D - Table 11.4-1 Fa 1.0
Site Class D - 21.3{ii) Fv 2.5
O.2* (S01/S05) Ta 0.138
Soi/Sos Ts 0.690
Fundamental Period (12.8.2) T Period
Seismic Design Maps or Fig 22-14 TL 8
Equation 11.4-4 - 2/3*SM1 501 1.0053*
Equation 11.4-2 - Fv*S1 SM1 1.5079*
Cr - At Perods <=0.2, Cr=CRs CRs 0.890
Cr - At Periods >=1.0, Cr=CR1 CRl 0.877
• Code-based desi1n value. See accompanying data for Site Specific Design values. (§)
Stadden Engineering

RISK COEFFICIENT
I-

REFERENCE NOTATION VALUE
Fv (Table 11.4-2)[Used for General Spect rum] Fv 1.7
Design Maps ss I 2.184
Design Maps S1 I 0.887
Equation 11.4-1- FA*S5 SMs 2.1a11•
Equation 11.4-3 - 2/3*SMs Sos 1.456*
Design Maps PGA I 0.989
Table 11.8-1 FPGA 1.1
Equation 11.8-1 - FPGA * PGA PGAM 1.088"'
Section 21.5.3 80% of PGAM 0.870 ' ::
i
Design M aps CRs I 0.890
Design Maps CRl I 0.877
Cr - At Periods between 0.2 and 1.0 Period Cr
use trendline formula t o complete 0.200 0.890

0.300 0.888

0.400 0.887

0.500 0.885

0.600 0.884

0.680 0.882

1.000 0.877
Mapped values from https://seismicmaps.org/

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) S ladd en
~ E n gineering
Period UGHM

0.010 0.964

0.100 1.536

0.200 2.006

0.300 2.333

0.500 2.419

0.750 2.116

1.000 1.847

2.000 1.144

3.000 0.812

4.000 0.595

5.000 0.453
RTHM

0.902

1.494

1.962

2.205

2.203

1.877

1.633

0.997

0.706

0.515

0.392
Max Directional
Scale Factor2

1.19 1.19

1.20 1.22

1.23 l.24

1.24 1.24

1.25 1.25

1.26 PROBABILISTIC SPECTRA1
2% in 50 year Exceedence
Probabilistic
MCE

1.073

1.778

2.354

2.690

2.710

2.327

2.025

1.236

0.883

0.644

0.494
Project No: 644-21002
1 Data Sources:
https://earthguake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/
https://earthguake.usgs.gov/designmaps/rtgm/
2 Shahi-Baker RotDl00/RotDS0 Factors (2014)
Probabilistic PGA: 0.964
Is Probabilistic Sa(max1<1.2Fa 7 NO
3 -
00 •H-1 1
!_ i~- '- 1_ 1_ :r-1-~r~71Mlj1ii1-t1=i!t5T. 1 __ : _[_ 1 1--r-~~-0_ -,--: -1 !-\-- --H ·1- ! -:-~-~! -i-h -1-1- -~0 rt~~Ll~]1H[M~~Rj -;++ :- _L 1+-:-11 ·1-·! i 1 ...... uGHM -I- . I - -· ,_ --- I --1 nec~R·lA 7 R1ESPON~1 E -locE[ER'A"'l:'IONst- I_J. - 1-- f
-1-J . , _u_, __ , __ , r.:1 ,_. I!\ ., , - ' 'i'"1' - --!-, _1 ,_ _1 !_ I_ RTHM :§
C
0 I I I I I: I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I ! ! I I I : 2- 50 - -n ~ - , --177·- , 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 , 1 1- 1- ,- 17- , , :- ,- ,- - i- -- 1 ., ! I 1-,-,--1---! -i-'-11-I- 1-···r·:·1-'·--1 !-r--·1--1·-i-;rnlJ - 1 -1·· 1 ·:-:-17---1--I- - ProbabilisticMCER
r - , 1 • ·1· -· 1 : - - - i-- -1- · :· n !- 1 1 :' - - --,- :··, 1 ·: -,T: - ---/·- -;-··; -1··, 1 ··! .L 1-.i ·r 1 • • - ·.--,--1 ·. f i- 1 +1 ~--1 -·: , ·! I I- f· I i · r,-,-1 -1 ·-1· 1 1 - - j ·1 ' h-1· I I - -l h ·1- n h-1- + l • i_J_J_ITi - I I j -1--:---1-1--·;--r- 1·T-i I Ti' 1-1- 2.00 - - - -, .- , . I I ' ,- ,- ,- , • ,-,--, I I I ·7 - i- - .- 1 ' I I L ,- J I I I '. : I - . _,J . - I _I _ _I , j ....... !_. . ,-~--- -~ -j _I_ J ... _ 1 !_t _ ·c_:--H-!~: L+j- ---j ·1-ij~_: 1 +i-1-- , l . ' I I ' . • I ' I ro 1 <( 1 ;-, I :--: ; :-·: ·i- -•I ; l ;J_/·-:··;·-· -rtH-1-.. : LI .. J 1, .. cq ]t .. 1 T 11- I . ! I I I ' I ' I
., ·i 1-·1---1-;~-7-- t 1 - '-·1·-i I r· ... ·-17
._J ___ -~ --· --J-,· r '7· !- ;--·1- '· ·- ,. -I __ , _, -.. 1.00 I , i i i I I
1 1 i I I ; I I -•--~,- ~"CLl .. i" :--.
•.Ll l
I I I I I ' ! I I_ J__;,._!_;_J I ~LU _J
a.so -H+t-! .. J... ! ... .:. i =r~J7 -l- ! -'-+' -i--t ! .!.f !-Cl7" + I ! i __ ,_J __ !J .. -I _j - l __ j ) ·1!--r~-1-~---1-- .. f .. J .,,.J.-1---1 1- 1 l -1·' -; j ;--+ •,. -1 J_,_J _,J.1.l-!-- _ i .. 11·-+----·l __ l 1--l I -,·-~ ·, '· •: ;··,--:- --/-1-1·:·1 "j

0.00 ·I J--H-+-H--J·i !· .. ! ·1·i-:: ·,·r h--- ·i- :--, +-;·---, i -, ·i--J-,-j ;-,·-j

0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 Period (seconds) 4.000 5.000
,.
:,
,I
Ii I!

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Sladden
~ Engineering

DETERMINISTIC SPECTRUM
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering All Sources Calculated using Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations1 Controlling Source: San Jacinto (Casa Loma)
Is Probabilistic Sa1maxi<l.2Fa7 NO
Deterministic PSa Max Directional Scale Section 21.2.2 Project No: 644-21002 Period Median + 1.cr for 5% Factor2 Deterministic MCE Scaling Factor Damping

0.010 1.033 1.19

0.020 1.037 1.19

0.030 1.049 1.19

0.050 1.087 1.19

0.075 1.273 1.19

0.100 1.488 1.19

0.150 1.788 1.20

0.200 2.005 1.20

0.250 2.210 1.21

0.300 2.324 1.22

0.400 2.429 1.23

0.500 2.402 1.23

0.750 2.045 1.24

1.000 1.768 1.24

1.500 1.292 1.24

2.000 0.985 1.24

3.000 0.679 1.25

4.000 0.461 1.25

5.000 0.336 1.26

1.229

1.234

1.248

1.293

1.515

1.771

2.146

2.406

2.674

2.836

2.988

2.955

2.535

2.193

1.602

1.222

0.849

0.576

0.423
Applied

1.229
J.234

1.243

1.2.93 1.515

1.771

2.146

2.<106

2.674

7. .336

2.988

2.955

2.535

2.193

1.602

1.222
O.o49

0.57G

0.423
Is Determinstic Sa(maxi<l.5*Fa7 NO
Section 21.2.2 Scaling Factor: N/A
Deterministic PGA: 1.033
Is Deterministic PGA >=FPGA *0.57 YES
1 NGAWest 2 GMPE worksheet and
Uniform California Earthquake Rupture
Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3) - Time
Dependent Model
2 Shahi-Baker RotDl00/RotDS0 Factors
(2014)

3.50 i ' I ! I I I I I ' I I I I I I J 1 · ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I f-1 I I I ' I I -T·'··i-1-r1- .. /--y.· -1 1,····1·· , ___ ;-. !·T· -;··· - --DE·1i,ERMINIS-TIClMCE ---:--:,-----·.·1·.-r+.·7·-·--· ·1-i·- -:· i· 1 ·r-, ·· 1---•- ·-·1 ·1 i- --,-·r/·;--i I- 1-1---1 1 -r:--}=1-1-r1-1r-~-! i-1 · ·-1-1··1 1 ·1 ;- 1_j::J_~t.i =1 .. ~-}Jb= :=rJ:-_i1i-=c+=s.e.E.C1ti1R~1t !RES_PON .. IE::-AC.C.E_JLER~TIQNS1-~T:r.J ~p~ _;1 · J.~ 3 00 ti I I I I I I ' I I ! ' I I I I _ 1_ 1 :_,_L.J_fil_J_LJ I I , 1 1_ __ · _ _1_ - Deterministic
MCER
. -1·••!--l ' 1---, --'--i . -·-:-; _____ ---1+ -P -l-1-+L -··; -' --+ !-:- -· I... 1·+1-l--1 -!-·+ f- ! T'- -+rl+:++.-~J-U J-,--,-1Ti rh+ -1+i-,+n+1--Trl·1··! 1 !-,--1·- - L L,-,-- 1 -1 ·1-._·:·+~-1--1- -i 1 -J·T1 crr:
7 -1··-_J·i1·r1·r-:· 1 1·:···--•·-i--r l·,-r, .1·/-,
'I J,L _ 11: I I: I _ I 11 ! I. I! I 2.50 '/ : ; : ~
1 1- 111-r--, 1·-11 -r-, ·1·T--·-· 111 ---·- - . r1·-, ···1......;- rf-,- -·· - --!-1· ;_T_ ... L -1--J __ , __ 1 J_ J _I .i. ~-- :§ 2.00
! I- L .. i--H·-r =r:1 l-l -~I-; _1·-r.- 1
: ={-=i~tr_:j·_-:_/ _; -J _ --_-, r1'f 1 ! 1
;
1-i-1-· ... I -/-··d,-·r1+· ... =r1-l···l-~--'-+1--l---,-L __ .17-! I l-- i , , I ' -i _._ I _J ___ 1_J _ 1 1 _j_ I _J __ L!_1_ -_! -=r~·f-··i: ·1:--r-r -~ ~)-.L1~,1--H1- 1-:::1! __ ~J= .=-·l~-!. l · /-L~l- l- C 0 ! ~ I ._

1.!!
' Cl>
~ 1.50
-·-· i rl-·1-1· .. -·1·-j---·-·-1 .Ll :-· --r 1 --~J-: 1.·:1 I . · : · · n·--:~;-!-T~?~1?.?~~r·:-1-:~·!-- : I- -i+t~, I
: .. i 1 1 . _ -I .1 1 1 i : ·, 1 1 - ., .. 1 ·j-1-- -. --1 1 . :-- ;- ;+-;-+ -+L-1. H++ U.-L+- _'_:~---i- i _j_])_:....:~1...:::.r:J] ___ 1_J.__::-,_J __ L:: _,_j 100 -_; --.-- ;··•···• -· --·-1-1--L. -B- )_. --•-: ,._.J_, - '-· I 1 .1,- -·-· ! -- i_l_L . I •. '. I j I~ I I I ! I I I _I__ I ! I ' ! I I ' ~ I I I I I I --! ,-'--1-··· --- --,·-···· ---·, -l . . I,. 'I I 11 ----j-· ----', ~,_ I __ ~ _ ...,__, II.I, - -, - 1 --'- l-- -+-,-·. --1 - -· -+ .. L ••. - 1 __ 1 ..... _J __ I _____ _l __ j___. 1-1 _Li I I I 7· 1-!- L _, -'+ L, ___ :_ ' - J. ''. ' I ! h : I~ ! I I ' I I .. I .'-.~--r .. ·.-H-1.· --.1- -.. 1 ··.Lr·v.·.·•· .. -. ' !
I ·i ++-1 ·/ l :-+ . -!--: i·t--J ·cr~r-r -:i .. r .i:.=J.-:T,t !=11~ ··::_ 1 ::-_-: -; :-n-,- ·1·-_t{·-- J-j--j. 1-r-,-+-,· ,- j--,-r; -, 1-J-~--!- l--'--1.··-'·--·LJ..I. ·1·-1 _1_J_J ---- _JJ 1 .. L ..J __ . ! : I ' I i o.5o i : :- -:- 1 - i-r-i- : _I _!_1+,- 1 1 : , : 1 1 1 i _ 1_ LL.LLLJ_1_ -~~ -.--,_~_c.:.1= ---,·--.---1-·.~·.•-.---..l..·1.·••-1-.·-_1._:-1- --l··'·-1 , , I I I I ' I I , 1 .---L_, l ,_J_:. , i7 --.',.!. , I L --! .. JI 1-,--1-•- I' 111 .... , •·•--·--- I I I -1-'1 ·-r-· I --,-'' _, __ ,, tf::!7 ,:-, ~:T ,-:- :r-7 i ·1 r·,- !-- -I -I ,-'+ r- ,+-;-1 -1--,+ i+-1-l H--E'---i-jci ... L( H- 0.00 tJ-l-H-+ H-+ r--- 1- !-:--: :::_1_- 1·-1 ··-i ~1->:~r :-·: l--; ·:---~-l-1--:::++-; L-,--1_ ;_·J.-F;~ ! :/~i-~:- :-_ 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 Period (seconds)
•:1

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ~
Period Probabilistic
MCE

0.010 1.073

0.100 1.778

0.200 2.354

0.300 2.690

0.500 2.710

0.750 2.327

1.000 2.025

2.000 1.236

3.000 0.883

4.000 0.644

5.000 0.494
SOS:

S01:

SMS:

SMl:

Site Specific PGAm:

SITE SPECIFIC SPECTRA
Deterministic Site-Specific

MCE MCE

1.229 1.073

1.771 1.771

2.406 2.354

2.836 2.690

2.955 2.710

2.535 2.327

2.193 2.025

1.222 1.222

0.849 0.849

0.576 0.576

0.423 0.423
ASCE 7-16: Section 21.4
Site Specific
Calculated I Design
Value Value

1.626 I 1.626

1.698
2,439

2.547

0.964

1.698

2.439

2.547

0.964
Site Class: D measured
Seismic Design Category - Short* E
Seismic Design Category - 1s* E
* Risk Categories I, II, or Ill
Stadden Engineering
Design Response
Spectrum (Sa)
ASCE 7 SECTION 11.4.6
80% General
Period General Spectrum Response Spectrum
n.r..r 0.005 0.614 0.491 ..
:::

1.181 0,010 0.646 0.517

1.570 0.020 0.709 0.567

1.793 0.030 0.772 0.618

1.806 0.050 0.899 0.719

1.552 0.060 0.962 0.770

1.350 0.075 1.057 0.846

0.814 0.090 1.152 0.921

0.566 0.100 1.215 0.972

0.384

0.282

0.110 1.278 1.023

0.120 1.342 1.073 i;

0.136 1.443 1.154

0.150 1.456 1.165 .J

0.160 1.456 1.165

0.170 1.456 1.165

0.180 1.456 1.165

0.200 1.456 1.165

0.250 1.456 1.165

0.300 1.456 1.165

0.400 1.456 1.165

0.500 1.456 1.165

0.600 1.456 1.165

0.640 1.456 · 1.165

0.680 1.456 1.165

0.850 1.183 0.946

0.900 1.117 0.894

0.950 1.058 0.847

1.000 1.005 0.804

1.500 0.670 0.536

2.000 0.503 0.402

3.000 0.335 0.268

4.000 0.251 0.201 ,'.!

5.000 0.201-- 0.161
Project No: 644-21002
,.,.,i i

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 350 - i i I I I j I I j I I i I I i 1 : : I I I l I i I I I I ! I I I ! I ! I I I l ! L ···-7 -··----·-;-··· --1·-,-·:----·-,-·- ··-s·PECTRA .. -~esp·mNSE1-AOC tERATIDNs-·-,·---,---•,-7·-···-·-,·-j-1-·- 1-1 - -·(! q+-L1+-+-T1 ~ 7-1---1_J-1T'-t+1---r--1-:--!-1-·-1_1_!--1+i-- 1-+--11-- "~T --- 1 1 d-,r-i--11+1--1---Ti r+! r+·-1-T i- 1 riTlT-h-·--+-,--"-;-i- _L.1.._ ---l--f--•-l---4--,- .. ·.·-·-1-- ·---1-··.-··'-···· 7-- ·-·•-1••····- ··- --1-· .--··1-·l"···--· ---- ••·-• -•· -·-7· ,- .--·1· .. ·-,- ·'··-1- ---·· --1-J_ -- -- 1 I , I, I. : , I , I I' 1 . · j I Ir L IL I I!·
3 00 - i I I I i u I i I _ 1 _L I ' I i I ,_ i i _ I _ _ I _ I 1_ I _ _L_l_!_ \_I - __ _ J_=~: { rCTJ-t=~ Lf-F1.:=J~ti.J==i-f ~-1-1~~t1_-~-r-1i~=-(-·.-J··•-1=[~f=~l--i.----:i.--1=tJ=f = 11~j.= " ' I l ' ,,--IT --1--T-,--1-:-l-·1T·,--rrr- -,-hr ' L,-r··-rh--- b- - 250 -n 1t~~ + ! i ,--i+! +ri i--Lr-1·1-1 +----7 ~~-+1-1+r+:···i·-rl- ,-·:r tp +'- I 1-· .I -H-- -1--'-- ; i-! - --,-- -h-~-+.-- +r1 - 17 ·-r+-, -L++;--1 . --'T -T 1-·-r- h-,i : I -- r~ :--··-·-;--···· 1--,--t·-1-· ---·i-1--1-•·l--h·--·1-- ···-1--r+ .t+- '-H---~--i-••:--1·-r/--··-·!---;-- --1- 1-·-1 Tj 1·-1 ·1 ' 1--,-- 1-·-1;--T--T ·Tr-·•-1··---n --)---~Ti --1·-1+1r1 TT i "iTf LLJ i i --+T T1lT--dT1+·r ---:-,T+....L!l-- --nLi IT+- ;
2 ·
00 --'--n-1
-H+:+---1 --1 H-H1-,--1-1Trfll,_1--:-i ;-TH-:-+- : :_ 1__1 1n-- ~ ·- . T ' -' ; -,-·1--1 !--rt .~-----11---1---;-- !·-i--··1-i--1-----r-1-t-·h·-+-,-·i r T+-i·--!·- i··-h-i - ~ ·- .T . i. r ·1---i-1-·· ··-i-- -T ··-1-· -;- r·--1-1--·1-·1-·r-1··r -·-·-1-+-r·T-, i-~T-1--··1 1-·!·-i----: TTT- ~ _ · _ _._J_~1_i__.=L1- ··1 +1-:- , · -J'-i-- -1--- -d 1-+-n c -r i tJrlttr -- n-rr T/-1 1 7-

1.50 -=· ....... --. . " 1 , 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 i , · J 1 1 n1 , j r 1 1 1 11 1 1 1----r · -1·-,--1·-1- ··-;-·1 I-· i ·- _.I_T 1--:- i -i--1·--·-1-·--:----j--:--1·-L· ~--- :~· r-·:--i- ·- -1-·rr 1-- ' - -,-- 1-·r·-;--1 -- ·-·1···-r-1-1·--1 -:--1---,- -l-·-,-,-·-1-- . -·:-·1-·,-r···+··1·r·- : I , : -.-- -1· 1- 1 --- :--1- 1-1--1-·1l_r _______ ·--1-· :-·l· :-~ ·- -- --·i•-:•-·i-----1 ·- ,--,-: - '~ -.- - T 1 I 'r,-1-1--,-, I --i-1 r+ ··-r-i-n+· ,r·-rn+,1T1T Tt"rH . r1 ~ : --i ·. : _ :~ ,·--.;:-....--!-H-H +!-++ -L H-H-H.-~. -l. -- f
-T_l.-,. -1. --1.·-1- T" i.··;. I : ,. ' .. - i ····~·--r··1-f-1· --1 r 1--T1·-·,-r-1.·-·:·· r-- +-~7--: TT __ .J\ · '· i. _, ·-: : ·? ·: - , · ·-- -1 T-·1-;-7···,--r-1· .- -r-- -·-1·--:---:--,· --:- 1·---l--i-t , --- :- , . , . i I I , . • l : , i : ·: : - , I 1 · l·-++ •1··-1-- 1 t 1 ! i i-1 I j I I : , .~: · .- - , t 1 1 , ,-' ~ -- 1 :-·-t-+_11 t-H +-' -·;--·, r-'.--:- _! L, ___ r: _u_ I ___ : J .. 1.-LJ I __ LI ·----LI-I--' --~- . -· . , · · 1 __ • • I -· , •· ,_ ..:. . , --i- i -tr!.! I-!- +-!- +-!- H ~-i + -jH- I+ I- H--1- -h+ ;-rh ; 1 1 ; , i 1- ' ":i, 0.00 -+T-rl :·!-1-·r Trr1·1·1 ,T-1Ti"iTi-1TT -l-·rT1-:-1--i 1-1·-1--1-1··1·:--1 1·1

0.50 1.00 -

0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000
Period (seconds)
-a-Probabilistic MCE
-a- Deterministic MCE
- •- Site-Specific MCE
Design Response Spectrum
~ASCE 7 Section 11.4.6 General Spectrum
...,._80% General Response Spectrum
-
J

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) .S. Seismic Design Maps https://seisrnicmaps.org/
L of 3
OS PD
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014; San Jacinto
Latitude, Longitude: 33.7900, -116.9877
Pa.!6mino Dr
G_o gle
Design Code Reference Document
Value
Ss 2.184
S1 0.887
SMs 2.184
SM1 null -See Section 11.4.8
Sos 1.456
So1 null -See Section 11.4.8
iType Value
SDC null -See Section 11.4.8
Fa
Fv null -See Section 11.4.8
PGA 0.989
FPGA 1.1
PG~ 1.088
TL 8
SsRT 2.184
SsUH 2.454
SsD 2.377
S1RT 0.887
S1UH 1.011
S1D 0.952
PG.Ad 1.001
CRs 0.89
Sandy NK
$
Stallions
Crossings Park
Description
3/29/2021, 9:35:59 PM
ASCE7-16
D-StiffSoil
fv'CER ground motion. (for 0.2 second period)
Description
fv'CER ground motion. (for 1.0s period)
Site-modified spectral acceleration value
Site-modified spectral acceleration value
Numeric seismic design value at 0.2 second SA
Numeric seismic design value at 1.0 second SA
Seismic design category
Site amplification factor at 0.2 second
Site amplification factor at 1.0 second
IVCEG peak ground acceleration
Site amplification factor at PGA
Site modified peak ground acceleration
Long-period transition period in seconds
Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion. (0.2 second) Factored uniform-hazard (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) spectral acceleration Factored deterministic acceleration value. (0.2 second) Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion. (1.0 second) Factored uniform-hazard (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) spectral acceleration.

Factored deterministic acceleration value. (1.0 second) Factored deterministic acceleration value. (Peak Ground Acceleration) Mapped value of the risk coefficient at short periods
i
~
LU:: Ann Cir
Christa Cir
Sykes Dr
Map data ©2021
3/29/2021, 9:35 AM

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ·.s. Seismic Design Maps https:/ /seismicmaps.org/
3 of 3

DISCLAIMER
While the information presented on this website is believed to be correct, SEAOC /OSHPD_ and its sponsors and contributors assume no responsibility or liability for its accuracy. The material presented in this web application should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by engineers or other licensed professionals. SEAOC / OSHPD do not intend that the use of this information replace the sound judgment of such competent professionals, having experience and knowledge in the field of practice, nor to substitute for the standard of care required of such professionals in interpreting and applying the results of the seismic data provided by this website. Users of the information from this website assume all liability arising from such use. Use of the output of this website does not imply approval by the governing building code bodies responsible for building code approval and interpretation for the building site described by latitude/longitude location in the search results of this website. 3/29/2021, 9:35 AM

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

APPENDIXD

LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES
Sladden Engineering
www.SladdenEngineering.com

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ~
en
:::i
I!!
fl)
i
en
-fi
Q)
!::
·;;
0 e
a..
~
~ er
::J
7 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, & 014; San Jancinto
Hole No.:BH-1 Water Depth:49 ft Magnitude:7.38
Acceleration=0.964g
Shear Stress Ratio Factor of Safety Settlement
(ft) 0 1 O 1 5 O (in.) 10
O ,--------,------r--,-l-\- ---r-- ~--~--,----e--~--~ --~-------, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ....--r-r---r-r-r-r--ro---.--r--, 10 ~
20 30 )
40 I ~------
l
50 fs1=1
CRR - CSR fs1
Shaded Zone has Liquefaction Potential
60 70
r@ Sladden Engineering
1 S = 7.25 in.

Saturated
Unsaturat. -
Plate A-1

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ************************************************************************************ *******************

LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Copyright by CivilTech Software
www.civiltech.com
************************************************************************************ *******************
Font: Courier New, Regular, Size 8 is recommended for this report.

Licensed to, 3/29/2021 9:38:51 AM
Input File Name: D:\Liquefy5\644-21002 BH-1.liq
Title: APN 436-280-011, 012, 013, & 014; San Jancinto
Subtitle:

Surface Elev.=
Hole No.=BH-1
Depth of Hole= 51.50 ft
Water Table during Earthquake= 49.00 ft
Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 49.00 ft
Max. Acceleration= 0.96 g
Earthquake Magnitude= 7.38
Input Data:

Surface Elev.=
Hole No.=BH-1
Depth of Hole=51.50 ft
Water Table during Earthquake= 49.00 ft
Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 49.00 ft
Max. Acceleration=0.96 g
Earthquake Magnitude=7.38
No-Liquefiable Soils: Based on Analysis

1. SPT or BPT Calculation.

2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu, M-correction

3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Modify Stark/Olson

4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction*

5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones*

6. Hammer Energy Ratio,

7. Borehole Diameter,
Ce= 1.25
Cb= 1.15

8. Sampling Method,

9. User request factor of safety (apply to CSR) ,
Plot one CSR curve (fsl=l)
Cs= 1
User= 1.1

10. Use Curve Smoothing: Yes*
* Recommended Options
In-Situ Test Data:

Depth SPT gamma Fines

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ft pcf %

0.00 8.00 109.30 22.30

2.00 8.00 109.30 22.30

5.00 8.67 102.50 24.70

10.00 19.00 102.50 5.50

15.00 10.67 100.80 6.20

20.00 16.00 100.80 31.40

25.00 14.00 126.80 37.10

30.00 22.00 126.80 8.20

35.00 14.67 126.10 30.70

40.00 12.00 126.10 Noliq

45.00 23.33 130.10 17.10

50.00 26.00 130.10 36.50
Output Results:

Settlement of Saturated Sands=0.22 in.

Settlement of Unsaturated Sands=7.03 in.

Total Settlement of Saturated and Unsaturated Sands=7.25 in.

Differential Settlement=3.625 to 4.785 in.

Depth CRRm CSRfs F.S. S_sat. S_dry S_all
ft in. in. in.

0.00 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.05 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.10 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.15 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.20 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.25 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.30 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.35 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.40 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.45 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.50 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.55 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.60 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.65 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.70 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.75 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.80 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.85 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.90 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

0.95 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

1.00 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

1.05 0.21 0.63 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.25

1.10 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

1.15 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

1.20 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

1. 25 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

1.30 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

1.35 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

1.40 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

1.45 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.03 7.24

1.50 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1. 55 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1.60 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1.65 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1. 70 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1. 75 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1.80 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1.85 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1.90 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.24

1.95 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.23

2.00 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.02 7.23

2.05 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.01 7.23

2.10 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.01 7.23

2.15 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.01 7.23

2.20 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.01 7.22

2.25 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.01 7.22

2.30 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.00 7.22

2.35 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 7.00 7.21

2.40 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.99 7.21

2.45 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.99 7.20

2.50 0.21 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.98 7.20

2.55 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.97 7.19

2.60 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.96 7.18

2.65 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.95 7.16

2.70 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.94 7.15

2.75 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.92 7.14

2.80 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.91 7 .13

2.85 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.90 7.11

2.90 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.88 7.10

2.95 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.87 7.09

3.00 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.86 7.08

3.05 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.85 7.06

3.10 .0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.83 7.05

3.15 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.82 7.04

3.20 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.81 7.03

3.25 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.80 7.01

3.30 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.78 7.00

3.35 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.77 6.99

3.40 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.76 6.98

3.45 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.75 6.96

3.50 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.73 6.95

3.55 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.72 6.94

3.60 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.71 6.93

3.65 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.70 6.91

3.70 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.68 6.90

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

3.75 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.67 6.89

3.80 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.66 6.88

3.85 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.65 6.86

3.90 0.22 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.64 6.85

3.95 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.62 6.84

4.00 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.61 6.83

4.05 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.60 6.82

4.10 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.59 6.80

4.15 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.58 6.79

4.20 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.56 6.78

4.25 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.55 6.77

4.30 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.54 6.76

4.35 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.53 6.74

4.40 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.52 6.73

4.45 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.50 6.72

4. 50 0.23 0.62 5.00 · 0.22 6.49 6.71

4.55 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.48 6.70

4.60 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.47 6.69

4.65 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.47 6.69

4.70 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.46 6.68

4.75 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.46 6.67

4.80 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.45 6.67

4.85 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.45 6.66

4.90 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.44 6.65

4.95 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.43 6.65

5.00 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.42 6.64

5.05 0.23 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.41 6.63

5.10 0.24 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.41 6.62

5.15 0.24 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.40 6.61

5.20 0.24 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.39 6.60

5.25 0.24 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.38 6.59

5.30 0.24 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.37 6.59

5.35 0.25 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.36 6.58

5.40 0.25 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.35 6.56

5.45 0.25 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.34 6.55

5.50 0.25 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.33 6.54

5.55 0.25 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.32 6.53

5.60 0.25 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.31 6.52

5.65 0.26 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.30 6.51

5.70 0.26 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.29 6.50

5.75 0.26 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.27 6.49

5.80 0.26 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.26 6.48

5.85 0.26 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.25 6.47

5.90 0.27 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.24 6.46

5.95 0.27 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.23 6.45

6.00 0.27 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.22 6.44

6.05 0.27 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.21 6.43

6.10 0.27 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.20 6.42

6.15 0.28 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.20 6.41

6.20 0.28 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.19 6.40

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

6.25 0.28 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.18 6.39

6.30 0.28 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.17 6.38

6.35 0.29 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.16 6.37

6.40 0.29 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.15 6.36

6.45 0.29 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.14 6.35

6.50 0.29 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.13 6.35

6.55 0.30 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.12 6.34

6.60 0.30 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.11 6.33

6.65 0.30 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.10 6.32

6.70 0.30 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.09 6.31

6.75 0.31 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.08 6.30

6.80 0.31 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.08 6.29

6.85 0.31 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.07 6.28

6.90 0.31 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.06 6.27

6.95 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.05 6.27

7.00 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.04 6.26

7.05 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.03 6.25

7.10 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.02 6.24

7.15 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.02 6.23

7.20 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.01 6.22

7.25 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 6.00 6.22

7.30 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.99 6.21

7.35 0.32 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.98 6.20

7.40 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.97 6.19

7.45 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.97 6.18

7.50 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.96 6.17

7.55 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.95 6.17

7.60 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.94 6.16

7.65 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.93 6.15

7.70 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.92 6.14

7.75 0.33 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.92 6.13

7.80 0.34 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.91 6.12

7.85 0.34 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.90 6.12

7.90 0.34 0.62 5.00 0.22 5.89 6.11

7.95 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.88 6.10

8.00 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.88 6.09

8.05 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.87 6.08

8.10 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.86 6.08

8.15 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.85 6.07

8.20 0.35 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.84 6.06

8.25 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.84 6.05

8.30 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.83 6.05

8.35 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.82 6.04

8.40 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.82 6.03

8.45 0.52 - 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.81 6.03

8.50 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.80 6.02

8.55 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.80 6.01

8.60 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.79 6.01

8.65 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.78 6.00

8.70 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.78 5.99

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

8.75 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.77 5.99

8.80 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.76 5.98

8.85 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.76 5.97

8.90 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.75 5.97

8.95 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.74 5.96

9.00 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.74 5.95

9.05 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.73 5.95

9.10 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.73 5.94

9.15 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.72 5.94

9.20 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.71 5.93

9.25 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.71 5.92

9.30 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.70 5.92

9.35 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.69 5.91

9.40 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.69 5.90

9.45 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.68 5.90

9.50 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.68 5.89

9.55 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.67 5.89

9.60 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.66 5.88

9.65 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.66 5.87

9.70 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.65 5.87

9.75 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.64 5.86

9.80 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.64 5.86

9.85 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.63 5.85

9.90 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.63 5.84

9.95 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.62 5.84

10.00 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.61 5.83

10.05 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.61 5.83

10.10 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.60 5.82

10.15 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.60 5.81

10.20 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.59 5.81

10.25 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.58 5.80

10.30 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.58 5.79

10.35 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.57 5.79

10.40 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.56 5.78

10.45 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.56 5.77

10.50 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.55 5.77

10.55 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.55 5.76

10.60 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.54 5.75

10.65 0.52 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.53 5.75

10.70 0.50 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.52 5.74

10.75 0.46 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.52 5.73

10.80 0.43 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.51 5.73

10.85 0.42 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.50 5.72

10.90 0.40 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.50 5.71

10.95 0.39 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.49 5.71

11.00 0.39 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.49 5. 71

11.05 0.38 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.49 5.71

11.10 0.37 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.49 5.70

11.15 0.37 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.48 5.70

11.20 0.36 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.48 5.70

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

11.25 0.35 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.48 5.70

11.30 0.35 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.48 5.69

11.35 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.47 5.69

11.40 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.47 5.69

11.45 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.47 5.68

11.50 0.33 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.47 5.68

11.55 0.33 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.46 5.68

11.60 0.32 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.46 5.67

11.65 0.32 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.46 5.67

11.70 0.32 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.45 5.67

11. 75 0.31 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.45 5.66

11.80 0.31 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.44 5.66

11.85 0.31 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.44 5.66

11.90 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.44 5.65

11.95 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.43 5.65

12.00 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.43 5.64

12.05 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.42 5.64

12.10 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.42 5.63

12.15 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.41 5.63

12.20 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.41 5.62

12.25 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.40 5.62

12.30 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.40 5.61

12.35 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.39 5.61

12.40 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.39 5.60

12.45 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.38 5.60

12.50 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.37 5.59

12.55 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.37 5.58

12.60 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.36 5.58

12.65 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.35 5.57

12.70 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.35 5.56

12.75 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.34 5.56

12.80 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.33 5.55

12.85 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.32 5.54

12.90 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.32 5.53

12.95 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.31 5.52

13.00 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.30 5.51

13.05 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.29 5.51

13.10 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.28 5.50

13.15 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.27 5.49

13.20 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.26 5.48

13.25 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.25 5.46

13.30 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.24 5.45

13.35 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.23 5.44

13.40 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.21 5.43

13.45 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.20 5.42

13.50 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.19 5.41

13.55 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.18 5.39

13.60 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.17 5.38

13.65 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.15 5.37

13. 70 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.14 5.36

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

13.75 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.13 5.34

13.80 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.11 5.33

13.85 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.10 5.32

13.90 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.09 5.31

13.95 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.08 5.29

14.00 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.06 5.28

14.05 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.05 5.27

14.10 0.20 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.04 5.25

14.15 0.20 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.02 5.24

14.20 0.20 0.61 5.00 0.22 5.01 5.22

14.25 0.20 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.99 5.21

14. 30 0.20 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.98 5.20

14.35 0.20 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.96 5.18

14.40 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.95 5.17

14.45 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.94 5.15

14.50 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.92 5.14

14.55 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.91 5.12

14.60 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.89 5.11

14.65 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.87 5.09

14.70 0.18 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.86 5.08

14.75 0.18 0.61 5.00 0.22 4.84 5.06

14.80 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.83 5.04

14.85 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.81 5.03

14.90 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.80 5.02

14.95 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.78 5.00

15.00 0.19 0.60 5.00 0.22 4. 77 4.99

15.05 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.76 4.97

15.10 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.74 4.96

15.15 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.73 4.94

15.20 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.71 4.93

15.25 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.70 4.91

15.30 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.68 4.90

15.35 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.67 4.89

15.40 0.20 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.66 4.87

15.45 0.21 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.64 4.86

15.50 0.21 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.63 4.84

15.55 0.21 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.62 4.83

15.60 0.21 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.60 4.82

15.65 0.21 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.59 4.80

15.70 0.21 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.58 4.79

15.75 0.21 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.56 4.78

15.80 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.55 4.77

15.85 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.54 4.75

15.90 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4. 52 4.74

15.95 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.51 4.73

16.00 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.50 4.71

16.05 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.49 4.70

16.10 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.47 4.69

16.15 0.22 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.46 4.68

16.20 0.23 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.45 4.67

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

16.25 0.23 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.44 4.65

16.30 0.23 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.43 4.64

16.35 0.23 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.41 4.63

16.40 0.23 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.40 4.62

16.45 0.23 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.39 4.61

16.50 0.23 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.38 4.59

16.55 0.24 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.37 4.58

16.60 0.24 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.35 4.57

16.65 0.24 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.34 4.56

16.70 0.24 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.33 4.55

16.75 0.24 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.32 4.54

16.80 0.24 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.31 4.53

16.85 0.24 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.30 4.51

16.90 0.25 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.29 4.50

16.95 0.25 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.28 4.49

17.00 0.25 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.27 4.48

17.05 0.25 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.25 4.47

17.10 0.25 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.24 4.46

17.15 0.25 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.23 4.45

17.20 0.25 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.22 4.44

17.25 0.26 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.21 4.43

17.30 0.26 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.20 4.42

17.35 0.26 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.19 4.41

17.40 0.26 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.18 4.40

17.45 0.26 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.17 4.39

17.50 0.26 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.16 4.38

17.55 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.15 4.37

17.60 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.14 4.36

17.65 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.13 4.35

17.70 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.12 4.34

17.75 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.11 4.33

17.80 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.10 4.32

17.85 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.09 4.31

17.90 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.08 4.30

17.95 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.07 4.29

18.00 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.06 4.28

18.05 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.05 4.27

18.10 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.04 4.26

18.15 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.03 4.25

18.20 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.02 4.24

18.25 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.02 4.23

18.30 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.01 4.22

18.35 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.22 4.00 4.21

18.40 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.99 4.20

18.45 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.98 4.19

18.50 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.97 4.19

18.55 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.96 4.18

18.60 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.95 4.17

18.65 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.94 4.16

18.70 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.93 4.15

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

18.75 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.93 4.14

18.80 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.92 4.13

18.85 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.91 4.12

18.90 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.90 4.12

18.95 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.89 4.11

19.00 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.88 4.10

19.05 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.87 4.09

19.10 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.87 4.08

19.15 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.86 4.07

19.20 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.85 4.06

19.25 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.84 4.06

19.30 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.83 4.05

19.35 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.82 4.04

19.40 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.82 4.03

19.45 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.81 4.02

19.50 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.80, 4.02

19.55 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.79 4.01

19.60 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.78 4.00

19.65 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.78 3.99

19.70 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.77 3.98

19.75 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.76 3.98

19.80 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.75 3.97

19.85 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.74 3.96

19.90 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.74 3.95

19.95 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.73 3.95

20.00 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.72 3.94

20.05 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.71 3.93

20.10 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.71 3.92

20.15 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.70 3.92

20.20 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.69 3.91

20.25 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.68 3.90

20.30 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.68 3.89

20.35 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.67 3.88

20.40 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.66 3.88

20.45 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.65 3.87

20.50 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.65 3.86

20.55 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.64 3.85

20.60 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.63 3.85

20.65 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.62 3.84

20.70 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.61 3.83

20.75 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.61 3.82

20.80 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.60 3.81

20.85 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.59 3.81

20.90 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.58 3.80

20.95 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.57 3.79

21.00 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.57 3.78

21.05 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.56 3.78

21.10 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.55 3.77

21.15 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.54 3.76

21.20 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.54 3.75

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

21.25 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.53 3.74

21.30 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.52 3.74

21.35 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.51 3.73

21.40 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.50 3.72

21.45 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.50 3. 71

21.50 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.49 3.70

21.55 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.48 3.70

21.60 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.22 3.47 3.69

21.65 0.34 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.46 3.68

21.70 0.34 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.45 3.67

21. 75 0.34 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.45 3.66

21.80 0.33 0.59 · 5.00 0.22 3.44 3.65

21.85 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.43 3.65

21.90 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.42 3.64

21.95 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.41 3.63

22.00 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.41 3.62

22.05 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.40 3.61

22.10 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.39 3.61

22.15 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.38 3.60

22.20 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.37 3.59

22.25 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.36 3.58

22.30 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.36 3.57

22.35 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.35 3.56

22.40 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.34 3.56

22.45 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.33 3.55

22.50 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.32 3.54

22.55 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.31 3.53

22.60 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.31 3.52

22.65 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.30 3.51

22.70 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.29 3.51

22.75 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.28 3.50

22.80 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.27 3.49

22.85 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.26 3.48

22.90 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.26 3.47

22.95 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.25 3.46

23.00 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.24 3.46

23.05 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.23 3.45

23.10 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.22 3.44

23.15 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.21 3.43

23.20 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.20 3.42

23.25 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.20 3.41

23.30 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.19 3.40

23.35 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.18 3.40

23.40 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.17 3.39

23.45 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.16 3.38

23.50 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.15 3.37

23.55 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.15 3.37

23.60 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.15 3.36

23.65 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.14 3.36

23.70 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.14 3.35

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

23.75 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.13 3.35

23.80 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.13 3.35

23.85 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.13 3.34

23.90 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.12 3.34

23.95 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.12 3.33

24.00 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.11 3.33

24.05 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.11 3.32

24.10 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.10 3.32

24.15 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.10 3.32

24.20 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.10 3.31

24.25 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.09 3.31

24.30 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.09 3.30

24.35 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.08 3.30

24.40 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.08 3.29

24.45 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.07 3.29

24.50 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.07 3.28

24.55 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.06 3.28

24.60 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.06 3.28

24.65 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.05 3.27

24.70 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.05 3.27

24.75 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.05 3.26

24.80 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.04 3.26

24.85 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.04 3.25

24.90 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.03 3.25

24.95 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.03 3.24

25.00 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.02 3.24

25.05 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.02 3.23

25.10 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.01 3.23

25.15 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.01 3.22

25.20 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 3.00 3.22

25.25 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.99 3.21

25.30 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.99 3.21

25.35 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.98 3.20

25.40 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.98 3.20

25.45 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.97 3.19

25.50 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.97 3.18

25.55 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.9.6 3.18

25.60 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.96 3.17

25.65 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.95 3.17

25.70 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.95 3.16

25.75 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.94 3.16

25.80 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.94 3.15

25.85 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.93 3.15

25.90 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.93 3.14

25.95 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.92 3.14

26.00 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.91 3.13

26.05 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.91 3.13

26.10 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.90 3.12

26.15 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.90 3.11

26.20 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.89 3.11

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

26.25 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.89 3.10

26.30 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.88 3.10

26.35 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.88 3.09

26.40 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.87 3.09

26.45 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.86 3.08

26.50 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.86 3.07

26.55 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.85 3.07

26.60 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.85 3.06

26.65 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.84 3.06

26.70 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.83 3.05

26.75 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.83 3.04

26.80 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.82 3.04

26.85 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.82 3.03

26.90 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.81 3.03

26.95 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.80 3.02

27.00 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.80 3.01

27.05 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.79 3.01

27.10 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.79 3.00

27.15 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.78 3.00

27.20 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.77 2.99

27.25 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.77 2.98

27.30 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.76 2.98

27.35 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.76 2.97

27.40 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.75 2.96

27.45 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.74 2.96

27.50 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.74 2.95

27.55 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.73 2.95

27.60 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.72 2.94

27.65 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.72 2.93

27.70 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.71 2.93

27.75 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.70 2.92

27.80 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.70 2.91

27.85 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.69 2.91

27.90 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.68 2.90

27.95 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.68 2.89

28.00 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.67 2.89

28.05 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.67 2.88

28.10 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.66 2.88

28.15 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.65 2.87

28.20 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.65 2.86

28.25 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.64 2.86

28.30 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.64 2.85

28.35 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.63 2.85

28.40 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.62 2.84

28.45 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.22 2.62 2.83

28.50 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.61 2.83

28.55 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.61 2.82

28.60 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.60 2.82

28.65 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.59 2.81

28.70 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.59 2.80

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

28.75 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.58 2.80

28.80 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.57 2.79

28.85 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.57 2.78

28.90 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.56 2.78

28.95 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.56 2.77

29.00 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.55 2.77

29.05 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.54 2.76

29.10 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.54 2.75

29.15 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.53 2.75

29.20 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.52 2.74

29.25 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.52 2.73

29.30 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.51 2.73

29.35 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.50 2.72

29.40 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.50 2.71

29.45 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.49 2.71

29.50 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.48 2.70

29.55 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.48 2.69

29.60 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.47 2.69

29.65 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.46 2.68

29.70 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.46 2.67

29.75 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.45 2.66

29.80 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.44 2.66

29.85 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.43 2.65

29.90 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.43 2.64

29.95 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.42 2.64

30.00 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.41 2.63

30.05 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.41 2.62

30.10 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.40 2.62

30.15 0.32 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.39 2.61

30.20 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.38 2.60

30.25 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.38 2.59

30.30 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.37 2.59

30.35 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.36 2.58

30.40 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.35 2.57

30.45 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.35 2.56

30.50 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.34 2.56

30.55 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.33 2.55

30.60 0.31 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.32 2.54

30.65 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.31 2.53

30.70 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.31 2.52

30.75 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.30 2.51

30.80 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.29 2.51

30.85 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.28 2.50

30.90 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.27 2.49

30.95 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.27 2.48

31.00 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.26 2.47

31.05 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.25 2.46

31.10 0.30 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.24 2.46

31.15 0.29 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.23 2.45

31.20 0.29 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.22 2.44

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

31.25 0.29 0.58 s .. 00 0.22 2.21 2.43

31. 30 0.29 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.20 2.42

31.35 0.29 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.19 2.41

31.40 0.29 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.18 2.40

31.45 0.29 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.18 2.39

31.50 0.29 0.58 5.00 0.22 2.17 2.38

31.55 0.29 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.16 2.37

31.60 0.29 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.15 2.36

31.65 0.29 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.14 2.35

31. 70 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.13 2.35

31.75 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.12 2.34

31.80 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.11 2.33

31.85 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.10 2.32

31.90 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.09 2.31

31.95 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.08 2.30

32.00 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.07 2.29

32.05 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.06 2.28

32.10 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.05 2.27

32.15 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.04 2.26

32.20 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.03 2.25

32.25 0.28 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.03 2.24

32.30 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.02 2.23

32.35 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.01 2.22

32.40 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 2.00 2.21

32.45 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.99 2.20

32.50 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.98 2.19

32.55 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.97 2.18

32.60 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.96 2.17

32.65 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.95 2.16

32.70 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.94 2.15

32.75 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.93 2.14

32.80 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.92 2.13

32.85 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.91 2.12

32.90 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.90 2.11

32.95 0.27 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.89 2.10

33.00 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.88 2.09

33.05 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.87 2.08

33.10 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.86 2.08

33.15 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.85 2.07

33.20 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.84 2.05

33.25 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.83 2.04

33.30 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.82 2.03

33.35 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.81 2.02

33.40 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1.80 2.01

33.45 0.26 0.57 5.00 0.22 1. 79 2.00

33.50 0.26 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 78 1.99

33.55 0.26 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 77 1.98

33.60 0.26 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 76 1.97

33.65 0.26 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 75 1.96

33.70 0.26 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 74 1.95

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

33.75 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 73 1.94

33.80 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.72 1.93

33.85 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.71 1.92

33.90 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 70 1.91

33.95 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.69 1.90

34.00 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.67 1.89

34.05 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.66 1.88
·34.10 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.65 1.87

34.15 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.64 1.86

34.20 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.63 1.85

34.25 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.62 1.84

34.30 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.61 1.83

34.35 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.60 1.82

34.40 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.59 1.81

34.45 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.58 1.80

34. 50 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.57 1. 79

34.55 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.56 1. 77

34.60 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.55 1. 76

34.65 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.54 1. 75

34.70 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1. 53 1. 74

34.75 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.52 1. 73

34.80 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.50 1. 72

34.85 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.49 1. 71

34.90 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.48 1. 70

34.95 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.47 1.69

35.00 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 .1.46 1.68

35.05 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.45 1.67

35.10 0.24 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.44 1.66

35.15 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.43 1.65

35.20 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.42 1.63

35.25 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.41 1.62

35.30 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.40 1.61

35.35 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.39 1.60

35.40 0.25 0.56 5.00 0.22 1.38 1.59

35.45 0.25 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.37 1. 58

35.50 0.26 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.36 1.57

35.55 0.26 0.55 5.00 0.22 1. 35 1. 56

35.60 0.26 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.34 1. 55

35.65 0.26 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.33 1.54

35.70 0.26 0.55 5.00 0.22 1. 32 1.53

35.75 0.27 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.31 1.52

35.80 0.27 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.30 1.51

35.85 0.27 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.29 1.50

35.90 0.27 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.28 1.49

35.95 0.27 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.27 1.48

36.00 0.27 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.26 1.47

36.05 0.28 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.25 1.46

36.10 0.28 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.24 1.46

36.15 0.28 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.23 1.45

36.20 0.28 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.22 1.44

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

36.25 0.28 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.21 1.43

36.30 0.29 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.20 1.42

36.35 0.29 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.19 1.41

36.40 0.29 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.18 1.40

36.45 0.29 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.18 1.39

36.50 0.29 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.17 1.38

36.55 0.30 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.16 1. 37

36.60 0.30 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.15 1.37

36.65 0.30 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.14 1.36

36.70 0.30 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.13 1. 35

36.75 0.31 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.12 1.34

36.80 0.31 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.11 1. 33

36.85 0.31 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.11 1. 32

36.90 0.31 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.10 1.31

36.95 0.32 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.09 1.31

37.00 0.32 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.08 1.30

37.05 0.32 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.07 1.29

37.10 0.32 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.06 1.28

37.15 0.33 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.06 1.27

37.20 0.33 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.05 1.26

37.25 0.33 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.04 1.26

37.30 0.34 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.03 1.25

37.35 0.34 0.55 5.00 0.22 1.02 1.24

37.40 0.34 0.54 5.00 0.22 1.02 1.23

37.45 0.35 0.54 5.00 0.22 1.01 1.23

37.50 0.35 0.54 5.00 0.22 1.00 1.22

37.55 0.35 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.99 1.21

37.60 0.36 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.99 1.20

37.65 0.36 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.98 1.19

37.70 0.36 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.97 1.19

37.75 0.37 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.96 1.18

37.80 0.37 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.96 1.17

37.85 0.38 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.95 1.16

37.90 0.39 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.94 1.16

37.95 0.39 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.93 1.15

38.00 0.40 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.93 1.14

38.05 0.41 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.92 1.14

38.10 0.42 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.91 1.13

38.15 0.44 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.91 1.12

38.20 0.47 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.90 1.12

38.25 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.89 1.11

38.30 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.89 1.10

38.35 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.88 1.10

38.40 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.87 1.09

38.45 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.87 1.08

38.50 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.86 1.08

38.55 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.86 1.07

38.60 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.85 1.07

38.65 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.84 1.06

38.70 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.84 1.05

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

38.75 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.83 1.05

38.80 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.83 1.04

38.85 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.82 1.04

38.90 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.82 1.03

38.95 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.81 1.03

39.00 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.81 1.02

39.05 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.80 1.02

39.10 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.80 1.01

39.15 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.79 1.01

39.20 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.78 1.00

39.25 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.78 1.00

39.30 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.22 0.78 0.99

39.35 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.77 0.99

39.40 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.77 0.98

39.45 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.76 0.98

39.50 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.76 0.97

39.55 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.75 0.97

39.60 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.75 0.96

39.65 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.74 0.96

39.70 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.74 0.95

39.75 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.73 0.95

39.80 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.73 0.95

39.85 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.73 0.94

39.90 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.72 0.94

39.95 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.72 0.93

40.00 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.72 0.93

40.05 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.72 0.93

40.10 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.72 0.93

40.15 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.71 0.93

40.20 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.71 0.92

40.25 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.70 0.92

40.30 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.70 0.92

40.35 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.70 0.91

40.40 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.69 0.91

40.45 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.69 0.90

40.50 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.68 0.90

40.55 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.68 0.89

40.60 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.67 0.89

40.65 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.67 0.89

40.70 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.66 0.88

40.75 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.66 0.88

40.80 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.65 0.87

40.85 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.65 0.87

40.90 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.64 0.86

40.95 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.64 0.86

41.00 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.63 0.85

41.05 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.63 0.85

41.10 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.62 0.84

41.15 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.62 0.84

41.20 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.61 0.83

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

41.25 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.61 0.82

41.30 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.22 0.60 0.82

41.35 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.60 0.81

41.40 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.59 0.81

41.45 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.59 0.80

41.50 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.58 0.80

41.55 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.57 0.79

41.60 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.57 0.79

41.65 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.56 0.78

41.70 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.56 0.77

41. 75 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.55 0.77

41.80 0.49 0. 52 5.00 0.22 0.54 0.76

41.85 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.54 0.75

41.90 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.53 0.75

41.95 0.49 0.52 5.00. 0.22 0.53 0.74

42.00 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.52 0.74

42.05 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.51 0.73

42.10 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.51 0.72

42.15 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.50 0.72

42.20 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.49 0.71

42.25 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.49 0.70

42.30 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.48 0.69

42.35 0.47 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.47 0.69

42.40 0.44 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.46 0.68

42.45 0.42 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.46 0.67

42.50 0.41 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.45 0.67

42.55 0.40 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.44 0.66

42.60 0.39 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.44 0.65

42.65 0.39 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.43 0.65

42. 70 0.38 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.42 0.64

42.75 0.37 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.41 0.63

42.80 0.37 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.41 0.62

42.85 0.36 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.40 0.62

42.90 0.36 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.40 0.61

42.95 0.36 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.39 0.61

43.00 0.35 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.39 0.61

43.05 0.35 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.39 0.61

43.10 0.35 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.39 0.60

43.15 0.34 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.38 0.60

43.20 0.34 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.38 0.60

43.25 0.34 0.52 5.00 0.22 0.38 0.60

43.30 0.33 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.38 0.59

43.35 0.33 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.37 0.59

43.40 0.33 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.37 0.59

43.45 0.33 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.37 0.58

43.50 0.32 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.36 0.58

43.55 0.32 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.36 0.58

43.60 0.32 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.36 0.58

43.65 0.32 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.36 0.57

43. 70 0.31 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.35 0.57

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

43.75 0.31 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.35 0.57

43.80 0.31 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.35 0.56

43.85 0.31 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.34 0.56

43.90 0.30 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.34 0.56

43.95 0.30 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.34 0.55

44.00 0.30 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.33 0.55

44.05 0.30 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.33 0.55

44.10 0.30 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.33 0.54

44.15 0.29 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.33 0.54

44.20 0.29 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.32 0.54

44.25 0.29 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.32 0.53

44.30 0.29 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.32 0.53

44.35 0.29 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.31 0.53

44.40 0.28 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.31 0.52

44.45 0.28 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.30 0.52

44.50 0.28 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.30 0.52

44.55 0.28 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.30 0.51

44.60 0.28 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.29 0.51

44.65 0.27 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.29 0.51

44.70 0.27 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.29 0.50

44.75 0.27 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.28 0.50

44.80 0.27 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.28 0.50

44.85 0.27 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.28 0.49

44.90 0.27 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.27 0.49

44.95 0.26 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.27 0.48

45.00 0.26 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.26 0.48

45.05 0.26 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.26 0.48

45.10 0.26 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.26 0.47

45.15 0.26 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.25 0.47

45.20 0.26 0.51 5.00 0.22 0.25 0.46

45.25 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.24 0.46

45.30 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.24 0.46

45.35 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.24 0.45

45.40 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.23 0.45

45.45 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.23 0.45

45.50 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.23 0.44

45.55 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.22 0.44

45.60 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.22 0.43

45.65 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.21 0.43

45.70 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.21 0.43

45.75 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.21 0.42

45.80 0.27 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.20 0.42

45.85 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.20 0.42

45.90 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.20 0.41

45.95 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.19 0.41

46.00 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.19 0.40

46.05 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.18 0.40

46.10 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.18 0.40

46.15 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.18 0.39

46.20 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.17 0.39

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

46.25 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.17 0.39

46.30 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.17 0.38

46.35 0.28 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.16 0.38

46.40 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.16 0.38

46.45 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.16 0.37

46.50 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.15 0.37

46.55 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.15 0.37

46.60 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.15 0.36

46.65 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.14 0.36

46.70 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.14 0.36

46.75 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.14 0.35

46.80 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.13 0.35

46.85 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.13 0.35

46.90 0.29 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.13 0.34

46.95 0.30 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.12 0.34

47.00 0.30 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.12 0.34

47.05 0.30 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.12 0.33

47.10 0.30 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.11 0.33

47.15 0.30 0.50 5.00 0.22 0.11 0.33

47.20 0.30 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.11 0.32

47.25 0.30 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.10 0.32

47.30 0.30 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.10 0.32

47.35 0.30 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.10 0.31

47.40 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.09 0.31

47.45 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.09 0.31

47.50 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.09 0.30

47.55 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.09 0.30

47.60 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.08 0.30

47.65 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.08 0.30

47.70 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.08 0.29

47.75 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.07 0.29

47.80 0.31 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.07 0.29

47.85 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.07 0.28

47.90 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.06 0.28

47.95 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.06 0.28

48.00 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.06 0.27

48.05 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.06 0.27

48.10 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.05 0.27

48.15 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.05 0.27

48.20 0.32 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.05 0.26

48.25 0.33 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.04 0.26

48.30 0.33 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.04 0.26

48.35 0.33 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.04 0.25

48.40 0.33 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.04 0.25

48.45 0.33 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.03 0.25

48.50 0.33 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.03 0.25

48.55 0.33 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.03 0.24

48.60 0.34 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.02 0.24

48.65 0.34 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.02 0.24

48.70 0.34 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.02 0.24

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

48.75 0.34 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.02 0.23

48.80 0.34 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.01 0.23

48.85 0.34 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.01 0.23

48.90 0.35 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.01 0.22

48.95 0.35 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.01 0.22

49.00 0.35 0.49 5.00 0.22 0.00 0.22

49.05 0.35 0.49 0.73* 0.22 0.00 0.22

49.10 0.35 0.49 0.73* 0.21 0.00 0.21

49.15 0.36 0.49 0.74* 0.21 0.00 0.21

49.20 0.36 0.49 0.74* 0.20 0.00 0.20

49.25 0.36 0.49 0.75* 0.20 0.00 0.20

49.30 0.37 0.49 0.75* 0.19 0.00 0.19

49.35 0.37 0.49 0.76* 0.19 0.00 0.19

49.40 0.37 0.49 0.77* 0.18 0.00 0.18

49.45 0.38 0.49 0.78* 0.18 0.00 0.18

49.50 0.38 0.49 0.78* 0.17 0.00 0.17

49.55 0.39 0.49 0.79* 0.17 0.00 0.17

49.60 0.39 0.49 0.80* 0.16 0.00 0.16

49.65 0.40 0.49 0.82* 0.16 0.00 0.16

49.70 0.40 0.49 0.83* 0.15 0.00 0.15

49.75 0.41 0.49 0.85* 0.15 0.00 0.15

49.80 0.42 0.49 0.87* 0.14 0.00 0.14

49.85 0.44 0.49 0.90* 0.14 0.00 0.14

49.90 0.45 0.49 0.93* 0.14 0.00 0.14

49.95 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.13 0.00 0.13

50.00 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.13 0.00 0.13

50.05 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.12 0.00 0.12

50.10 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.12 0.00 0.12

50.15 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.12 0.00 0.12

50.20 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.11 0.00 0.11

50.25 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.11 0.00 0.11

50.30 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.10 0.00 0.10

50.35 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.10 0.00 0.10

50.40 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.09 0.00 0.09

50.45 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.09 0.00 0.09

50.50 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.09 0.00 0.09

50.55 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.08 0.00 0.08

50.60 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.08 0.00 0.08

50.65 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.07 0.00 0.07

50.70 0.47 0.49 0.96* 0.07 0.00 0.07

50.75 0.46 0.49 0.95* 0.06 0.00 0.06

50.80 0.46 0.49 0.95* 0.06 0.00 0.06

50.85 0.46 0.49 0.94* 0.06 0.00 0.06

50.90 0.46 0.49 0.94* 0.05 0.00 0.05

50.95 0.45 0.49 0.93* 0.05 0.00 0.05

51.00 0.45 0.49 0.93* 0.04 0.00 0.04

51.05 0.45 0.49 0.92* 0.04 0.00 0.04

51.10 0.45 0.49 0.92* 0.03 0.00 0.03

51.15 0.44 0.49 0.92* 0.03 0.00 0.03

51.20 0.44 0.49 0.91* 0.03 0.00 0.03

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

51.25 0.44 0.49 0.91* 0.02 0.00 0.02

51.30 0.44 0.49 0.90* 0.02 0.00 0.02

51. 35 0.44 0.49 0.90* 0.01 0.00 0.01

51.40 0.44 0.49 0.90* 0.01 0.00 0.01

51.45 0.43 0.49 0.89* 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.50 0.43 0.49 0.89* 0.00 0.00 0.00
* F.S.<1, Liquefaction Potential Zone
(F.S. is limited to 5, CRR is limited to 2, CSR is limited to 2) Units: Unit: qc, fs, Stress or Pressure= atm (1. 0581tsf); Unit Weight pcf; Depth = ft; Settlement= in.
1 atm (atmosphere)= 1 tsf (ton/ft2)
CRRm Cyclic resistance ratio from soils
CSRsf Cyclic stress ratio induced by a given earthquake (with user request factor of safety)
F.S. Factor of Safety against liquefaction, F.S.=CRRm/CSRsf S sat Settlement from saturated sands
S_dry Settlement from Unsaturated Sands
S_all Total Settlement from Saturated and Unsaturated Sands NoLiq No-Liquefy Soils

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) c(
en
:::,
~ Ill
~
0 en
-£
~ ·;;;
0 e
a.
~ Q)
:,
CT
:.J

LIQUEFACTION ANAL VSIS
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014; San Jancinto
Hole No.=BH-4 Water Depth=49 ft Magnitude=7.38
Acceleration=0.964g
Shear Stress Ratio Factor of Safety Settlement
(ft) 0 1 O 1 5 0 (in.) 10 0 ,-------r-----,---,--- --.---..------r-----.--,,-----.-----,.-------r--- I I I I I I I I 10 20
-30
40 so fs1=1
CAR - CSR fs1
Shaded Zone has Liquefaction Potential
60 70
r@ Sladden Engineering
S = 6.36 in.

Saturated
Unsaturat. -
Plate A-1

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ************************************************************************************ *******************

Licensed to, 3/29/2021 9:40:21 AM
Input File Name: D:\Liquefy5\644-21002 BH-4.liq
Title: APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014; San Jancinto
Subtitle:

Surface Elev.=
Hole No.=BH-4
Depth of Hole= 51.50 ft
Water Table during Earthquake= 49.00 ft
Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 49.00 ft
Max. Acceleration= 0.96 g
Earthquake Magnitude= 7.38
Input Data:

Surface Elev.=
Hole No.=BH-4
Depth of Hole=51.50 ft
Water Table during Earthquake= 49.00 ft
Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 49.00 ft
Max. Acceleration=0.96 g
Earthquake Magnitude=7.38
No-Liquefiable Soils: Based on Analysis

1. SPT or BPT Calculation.

2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu, M-correction

3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Modify Stark/Olson

4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction*

5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones*

6. Hammer Energy Ratio,

7. Borehole Diameter,
Ce= 1.25
Cb= 1.15

8. Sampling Method,

9. User request factor of safety (apply to CSR) ,
Plot one CSR curve (fsl=l)
Cs= 1
User= 1.1

10. Use Curve Smoothing: Yes*
* Recommended Options
In-Situ Test Data:

Depth SPT gamma Fines

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ft pcf %

0.00 8.00 110.70 2.20

5.00 8.00 110.70 2.20

10.00 11.33 110.70 1.30

15.00 13.00 110.70 54.60

20.00 18.67 110.70 1.90

25.00 18.00 110.70 12.30

30.00 34.67 108.80 4.60

35.00 28.00 108.80 4.50

40.00 26.00 130. 30 42.90

45.00 13.00 130. 30 Noliq

50.00 21.33 126.60 Noliq
Output Results:

Settlement of Saturated Sands=0.00 in.

Settlement of Unsaturated Sands=6.36 in.

Total Settlement of Saturated and Unsaturated Sands=6.36 in.

Differential Settlement=3.180 to 4.197 in.

Depth CRRm CSRfs F.S. S_sat. S_dry S_all
ft in. in. in.

0.00 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.05 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.10 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.15 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.20 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.25 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.30 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.35 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.40 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.45 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.50 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.55 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.60 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.65 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.70 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.75 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.36 6.36

0.80 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

0.85 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

0.90 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

0.95 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.00 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.05 0.17 0.63 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.10 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.15 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.20 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.25 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

1.30 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.35 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.40 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.45 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.35 6.35

1.50 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.34 6.34

1.55 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.34 6.34

1.60 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.34 6.34

1.65 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.34 6.34

1. 70 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.34 6.34

1. 75 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.34 6.34

1.80 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.33 6.33

1.85 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.33 6.33

1.90 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.32 6.32

1.95 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.32 6.32

2.00 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.31 6.31

2.05 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.30 6.30

2.10 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.29 6.29

2.15 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.28 6.28

2.20 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.26 6.26

2.25 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.24 6.24

2.30 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.22 6.22

2.35 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.20 6.20

2.40 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.19 6.19

2.45 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.17 6.17

2.50 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.15 6.15

2.55 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.13 6.13

2.60 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.11 6.11

2.65 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.10 6.10

2.70 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.08 6.08

2.75 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.06 6.06

2.80 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.04 6.04

2.85 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.02 6.02

2.90 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 6.00 6.00

2.95 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.99 5.99

3.00 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.97 5.97

3.05 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.95 5.95

3.10 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.93 5.93

3.15 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.91 5.91

3.20 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.90 5.90

3.25 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.88 5.88

3.30 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.86 5.86

3.35 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.84 5.84

3.40 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.82 5.82

3.45 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.81 5.81

3.50 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.79 5.79

3.55 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.77 5.77

3.60 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.75 5.75

3.65 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.73 5.73

3.70 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.71 5. 71

3.75 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.70 5.70

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

3.80 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.68 5.68

3.85 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.66 5.66

3.90 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.64 5.64

3.95 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.62 5.62

4.00 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.61 5.61

4.05 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.59 5.59

4.10 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.57 5.57

4.15 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.55 5.55

4.20 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.53 5.53

4.25 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.51 5.51

4.30 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.50 5.50

4.35 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.48 5.48

4.40 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.46 5.46

4.45 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.44 5.44

4.50 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.42 5.42

4. 55 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.41 5.41

4.60 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.39 5.39

4.65 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.37 5.37

4.70 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.35 5.35

4.75 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.33 5.33

4.80 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.31 5.31

4.85 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.30 5.30

4.90 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.28 5.28

4.95 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.26 5.26

5.00 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.24 5.24

5.05 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.22 5.22

5.10 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.21 5.21

5.15 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.19 5.19

5.20 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.17 5.17

5.25 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.15 5.15

5.30 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.13 5.13

5.35 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.12 5.12

5.40 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.10 5.10

5.45 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.08 5.08

5.50 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.06 5.06

5.55 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.05 5.05

5.60 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.03 5.03

5.65 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.01 5.01

5.70 0.17 0.62 5.00 0.00 5.00 5.00

5.75 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.98 4.98

5.80 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.96 4.96

5.85 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.95 4.95

5.90 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.93 4.93

5.95 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.91 4.91

6.00 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.90 4.90

6.05 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.88 4.88

6.10 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.86 4.86

6.15 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.85 4.85

6.20 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.83 4.83

6.25 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.82 4.82

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

6.30 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.80 4.80

6.35 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4. 78 4.78

6.40 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.77 4.77

6.45 0.18 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.75 4.75

6.50 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4. 74 4.74

6.55 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.72 4.72

6.60 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.70 4.70

6.65 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.69 4.69

6.70 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.67 4.67

6.75 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.66 4.66

6.80 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.64 4.64

6.85 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.63 4.63

6.90 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.61 4.61

6.95 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.60 4.60

7.00 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.58 4.58

7.05 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.57 4.57

7.10 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.55 4.55

7.15 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.53 4.53

7.20 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.52 4.52

7.25 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.50 4.50

7.30 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.49 4.49

7.35 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.47 4.47

7.40 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.46 4.46

7.45 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.44 4.44

7.50 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.43 4.43

7.55 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.41 4.41

7.60 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.40 4.40

7.65 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.38 4.38

7.70 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4. 37 4.37

7.75 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.35 4.35

7.80 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.33 4.33

7.85 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.32 4.32

7.90 0.19 0.62 5.00 0.00 4.30 4.30

7.95 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.29 4.29

8.00 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.27 4.27

8.05 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.26 4.26

8.10 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.24 4.24

8.15 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.23 4.23

8.20 0.19 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.21 4.21

8.25 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.20 4.20

8.30 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.18 4.18

8.35 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.17 4.17

8.40 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.16 4.16

8.45 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.14 4.14

8.50 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.13 4.13

8.55 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.12 4.12

8.60 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.10 4.10

8.65 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.09 4.09

8.70 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.08 4.08

8.75 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.07 4.07

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

8.80 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.05 4.05

8.85 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.04 4.04

8.90 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.03 4.03

8.95 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.01 4.01

9.00 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 4.00 4.00

9.05 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.99 3.99

9.10 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.97 3.97

9.15 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.96 3.96

9.20 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.95 3.95

9.25 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.94 3.94

9.30 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.92 3.92

9.35 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.91 3.91

9.40 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.90 3.90

9.45 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.88 3.88

9.50 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.87 3.87

9.55 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.86 3.86

9.60 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.84 3.84

9.65 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.83 3.83

9.70 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.82 3.82

9.75 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.81 3.81

9.80 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.79 3.79

9.85 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.78 3.78

9.90 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.77 3.77

9.95 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.75 3.75

10.00 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.74 3.74

10.05 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.73 3.73

10.10 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.72 3.72

10.15 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.70 3.70

10.20 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.69 3.69

10.25 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.68 3.68

10.30 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.66 3.66

10.35 0.21 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.66 3.66

10.40 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.65 3.65

10.45 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.64 3.64

10.50 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.63 3.63

10.55 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.62 3.62

10.60 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.61 3.61

10.65 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.60 3.60

10.70 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.60 3.60

10.75 0.22 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.59 3.59

10.80 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.58 3.58

10.85 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.57 3.57

10.90 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.56 3.56

10.95 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.55 3.55

11.00 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.55 3.55

11.05 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.54 3.54

11.10 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.53 3.53

11.15 0.23 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.52 3.52

11.20 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.51 3.51

11.25 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.50 3.50

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ll.30 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.50 3.50

11. 35 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.49 3.49

11.40 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.48 3.48

11.45 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.47 3.47

11.50 0.24 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.47 3.47

11.55 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.46 3.46

11.60 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.45 3.45

11.65 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.44 3.44

11.70 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.43 3.43

11. 75 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.43 3.43

11.80 0.25 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.42 3.42

11.85 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.41 3.41

11.90 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.40 3.40

11.95 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.40 3.40

12.00 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.39 3.39

12.05 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.38 3.38

12.10 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.37 3.37

12.15 0.26 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.37 3.37

12.20 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.36 3.36

12.25 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.35 3.35

12.30 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.34 3.34

12.35 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.34 3.34

12.40 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.33 3.33

12.45 0.27 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.32 3.32

12.50 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.32 3.32

12.55 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.31 3.31

12.60 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.30 3.30

12.65 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.30 3.30

12.70 0.28 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.29 3.29

12.75 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.28 3.28

12.80 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.27 3.27

12.85 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.27 3.27

12.90 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.26 3.26

12.95 0.29 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.25 3.25

13.00 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.25 3.25

13.05 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.24 3.24

13.10 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.23 3.23

13.15 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.23 3.23

13.20 0.30 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.22 3.22

13.25 0.31 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.21 3.21

13.30 0.31 · 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.21 3.21

13.35 0.31 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.20 3.20

13.40 0.31 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.19 3.19

13.45 0.31 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.19 3.19

13.50 0.32 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.18 3.18

13. 55 0.32 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.17 3.17

13.60 0.32 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.17 3.17

13.65 0.32 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.16 3.16

13.70 0.33 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.16 3.16

13.75 0.33 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.15 3.15

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

13.80 0.33 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.14 3.14

13.85 0.33 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.14 3.14

13.90 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.13 3.13

13.95 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.12 3.12

14.00 0.34 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.12 3.12

14.05 0.35 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.11 3.11

14.10 0.35 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.11 3.11

14.15 0.35 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.10 3.10

14.20 0.35 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.09 3.09

14.25 0.36 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.09 3.09

14.30 0.36 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.08 3.08

14.35 0.36 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.08 3.08

14.40 0.37 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.07 3.07

14.45 0.37 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.06 3.06

14.50 0.38 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.06 3.06

14.55 0.38 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.05 3.05

14.60 0.39 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.05 3.05

14.65 0.39 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.04 3.04

14.70 0.40 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.03 3.03

14.75 0.40 0.61 5.00 0.00 3.03 3.03

14.80 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 3.02 3.02

14.85 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 3.02 3.02

14.90 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 3.01 3.01

14.95 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 3.01 3.01

15.00 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 3.01 3.01

15.05 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 3.00 3.00

15.10 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 3.00 3.00

15.15 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.99 2.99

15.20 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.99 2.99

15.25 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.98 2.98

15.30 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.98 2.98

15.35 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.97 2.97

15.40 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.97 2.97

15.45 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.96 2.96

15.50 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.96 2.96

15.55 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.95 2.95

15.60 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.95 2.95

15.65 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.94 2.94

15.70 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.94 2.94

15.75 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.93 2.93

15.80 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.93 2.93

15.85 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.92 2.92

15.90 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.91 2.91

15.95 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.91 2.91

16.00 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.90 2.90

16.05 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.90 2.90

16.10 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.89 2.89

16.15 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.88 2.88

16.20 0.52 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.88 2.88

16.25 0.51 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.87 2.87

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

16.30 0.48 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.86 2.86

16.35 0.47 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.86 2.86

16.40 0.45 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.85 2.85

16.45 0.44 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.84 2.84

16.50 0.44 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.83 2.83

16.55 0.43 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.83 2.83

16.60 0.42 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.82 2.82

16.65 0.42 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.81 2.81

16.70 0.41 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.81 2.81

16.75 0.41 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.80 2.80

16.80 0.40 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.79 2.79

16.85 0.40 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.78 2.78

16.90 0.40 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.78 2.78

16.95 0.39 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.77 2.77

17.00 0.39 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.76 2.76

17.05 0.39 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.75 2.75

17.10 0.38 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.75 2.75

17.15 0.38 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.74 2.74

17.20 0.38 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.73 2.73

17.25 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.72 2.72

17.30 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.72 2.72

17.35 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.71 2.71

17.40 0.37 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.70 2.70

17.45 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.69 2.69

17.50 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.69 2.69

17.55 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.68 2.68

17.60 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.67 2.67

17.65 0.36 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.66 2.66

17.70 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.66 2.66

17.75 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.65 2.65

17.80 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.64 2.64

17.85 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.63 2.63

17.90 0.35 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.62 2.62

17.95 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.62 2.62

18.00 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.61 2.61

18.05 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.60 2.60

18.10 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.59 2.59

18.15 0.34 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.58 2.58

18.20 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.58 2.58

18.25 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.57 2.57

18.30 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.56 2.56

18.35 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.55 2.55

18.40 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.54 2.54

18.45 0.33 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.53 2.53

18.50 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.53 2.53

18.55 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.52 2.52

18.60 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.51 2.51

18.65 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.50 2.50

18.70 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.49 2.49

18.75 0.32 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.48 2.48

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

18.80 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.48 2.48

18.85 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.47 2.47

18.90 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.46 2.46

18.95 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.45 2.45

19.00 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.44 2.44

19.05 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.43 2.43

19.10 0.31 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.42 2.42

19.15 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.42 2.42

19.20 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.41 2.41

19.25 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.40 2.40

19.30 0.30 . 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.39 2.39

19.35 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.38 2.38

19.40 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.37 2.37

19.45 0.30 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.36 2.36

19.50 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.35 2.35

19.55 0~29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.34 2.34

19.60 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.33 2.33

19.65 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.33 2.33

19.70 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.32 2.32

19.75 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.31 2.31

19.80 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.30 2.30

19.85 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.29 2.29

19.90 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.28 2.28

19.95 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.27 2.27

20.00 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.26 2.26

20.05 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.25 2.25

20.10 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.24 2.24

20.15 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.23 2.23

20.20 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.22 2.22

20.25 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.22 2.22

20.30 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.21 2.21

20.35 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.20 2.20

20.40 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.19 2.19

20.45 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.18 2.18

20.50 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.17 2.17

20.55 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.16 2.16

20.60 0.29 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.15 2.15

20.65 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.14 2.14

20.70 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.13 2.13

20.75 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.12 2.12

20.80 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.11 2.11

20.85 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.10 2.10

20.90 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.09 2.09

20.95 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.09 2.09

21.00 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.08 2.08

21.05 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.07 2.07

21.10 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.06 2.06

21.15 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.05 2.05

21.20 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.04 2.04

21.25 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.03 2.03

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

21.30 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.02 2.02

21.35 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.01 2.01

21.40 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 2.00 2.00

21.45 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 1.99 1.99

21.50 0.28 0.60 5.00 0.00 1.98 1.98

21.55 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.00 1.97 1.97

21.60 0.27 0.60 5.00 0.00 1.96 1.96

21.65 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.95 1.95

21.70 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.94 1.94

21. 75 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.93 1.93

21.80 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.92 1.92

21.85 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.91 1.91

21.90 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.90 1.90

21.95 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.89 1.89

22.00 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.88 1.88

22.05 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.87 1.87

22.10 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.86 1.86

22.15 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.86 1.86

22.20 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.85 1.85

22.25 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.85 1.85

22.30 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.84 1.84

22.35 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.84 1.84

22.40 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.83 1.83

22.45 0.27 0. 59 5.00 0.00 1.83 1.83

22.50 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.82 1.82

22.55 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.82 1.82

22.60 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.81 1.81

22.65 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.81 1.81

22.70 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.80 1.80

22.75 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 79 1. 79

22.80 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 79 1. 79

22.85 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 78 1. 78

22.90 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 78 1. 78

22.95 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 77 1. 77

23.00 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 77 1. 77

23.05 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 76 1. 76

23.10 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.76 1. 76

23.15 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 75 1. 75

23.20 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 74 1. 74

23.25 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 74 1. 74

23.30 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 73 1. 73

23.35 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 73 1. 73

23.40 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 72 1. 72

23.45 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 71 1. 71

23.50 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 71 1. 71

23.55 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 70 1. 70

23.60 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 70 1. 70

23.65 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.69 1.69

23.70 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.68 1.68

23.75 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.68 1.68

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

23.80 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.67 1.67

23.85 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.67 1.67

23.90 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.66 1.66

23.95 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.65 1.65

24.00 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.65 1.65

24.05 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.64 1.64

24.10 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.63 1.63

24.15 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.63 1.63

24.20 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.62 1.62

24.25 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.61 1.61

24.30 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.61 1.61

24.35 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.60 1.60

24.40 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.60 1.60

24.45 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.59 1.59

24.50 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.58 1.58

24.55 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 · 1.58 1. 58

24.60 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.57 1.57

24.65 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.56 1. 56

24.70 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.55 1.55

24.75 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.55 1. 55

24.80 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.54 1.54

24.85 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 53 1.53

24.90 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.53 1.53

24.95 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.52 1.52

25.00 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.51 1.51

25.05 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.51 1.51

25.10 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.50 1.50

25.15 0.27 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.49 1.49

25.20 0.28 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.49 1.49

25.25 0.28 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.48 1.48

25.30 0.28 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.47 1.47

25.35 0.28 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.47 1.47

25.40 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.46 1.46

25.45 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.45 1.45

25.50 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.45 1.45

25.55 0.29 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.44 1.44

25.60 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.43 1.43

25.65 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.43 1.43

25.70 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.42 1.42

25.75 0.30 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.42 1.42

25.80 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.41 1.41

25.85 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.41 1.41

25.90 0.31 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.40 1.40

25.95 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.40 1.40

26.00 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.39 1.39

26.05 0.32 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.38 1.38

26.10 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.38 1.38

26.15 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.37 1.37

26.20 0.33 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.37 1.37

26.25 0.34 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.36 1.36

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

26.30 0.34 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.36 1. 36

26.35 0.34 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 35 1.35

26.40 0.35 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 35 1.35

26.45 0.35 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 35 1.35

26.50 0.35 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.34 1.34

26.55 0.36 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 34 1.34

26.60 0.36 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.33 1.33

26.65 0.37 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.33 1. 33

26.70 0.37 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.32 1.32

26.75 0.38 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.32 1.32

26.80 0.38 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 31 1.31

26.85 0.39 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.31 1.31

26.90 0.39 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.31 1.31

26.95 0.40 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.30 1.30

27.00 0.41 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.30 1.30

27.05 0.42 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.29 1.29

27.10 0.43 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.29 1.29

27.15 0.44 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.28 1.28

27.20 0.47 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.28 1.28

27.25 0.51 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.28 1.28

27.30 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 27 1.27

27.35 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.27 1.27

27.40 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.27 1.27

27.45 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.26 1.26

27.50 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.26 1.26

27.55 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.25 1. 25

27.60 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.25 1.25

27.65 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.25 1.25

27.70 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.24 1.24

27.75 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.24 1.24

27.80 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.24 1.24

27.85 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.23 1.23

27.90 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.23 1.23

27.95 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.23 1.23

28.00 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.22 1.22

28.05 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 22 1.22

28.10 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.22 1.22

28.15 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.22 1.22

28.20 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.21 1.21

28.25 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.21 1.21

28.30 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1. 21 1.21

28.35 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.21 1.21

28.40 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.20 1.20

28.45 0.52 0.59 5.00 0.00 1.20 1.20

28.50 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.20 1.20

28.55 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.20 1.20

28.60 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.19 1.19

28.65 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.19 1.19

28.70 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.19 1.19

28.75 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.19 1.19

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

28.80 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.18 1.18

28.85 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.18 1.18

28.90 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.18 1.18

28.95 0.52 .0.58 5.00 0.00 1.18 1.18

29.00 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.17 1.17

29.05 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.17 1.17

29.10 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.17 1.17

29.15 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.17 1 .. 17

29.20 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.17 1.17

29.25 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.16 1.16

29.30 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.16 1.16

29.35 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.16 1.16

29.40 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.16 1.16

29.45 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.16 1.16

29.50 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.15 1.15

29.55 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.15 1.15

29.60 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.15 1.15

29.65 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.15 1.15

29.70 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.15 1.15

29.75 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.14 1.14

29.80 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.14 1.14

29.85 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.14 1.14

29.90 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.14 1.14

29.95 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.14 1.14

30.00 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.14 1.14

30.05 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.13 1.13

30.10 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.13 1.13

30.15 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.13 1.13

30.20 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.13 1.13

30.25 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.13 1.13

30.30 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.13 1.13

30.35 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.12 1.12

30.40 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.12 1.12

30.45 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.12 1.12

30.50 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.12 1.12

30.55 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.12 1.12

30.60 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.11 1.11

30.65 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.11 1.11

30.70 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.11 1.11

30.75 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.11 1.11

30.80 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.11 1.11

30.85 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.10 1.10

30.90 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.10 1.10

30.95 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.10 1.10

31.00 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.10 1.10

31.05 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.10 1.10

31.10 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.09 1.09

31.15 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.09 1.09

31.20 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.09 1.09

31.25 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.09 1.09

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

31. 30 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.08 1.08

31.35 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.08 1.08

31.40 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.08 1.08

31.45 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.08 1.08

31.50 0.52 0.58 5.00 0.00 1.07 1.07

31.55 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.07 1.07

31.60 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.07 1.07

31.65 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.07 1.07

31.70 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.06 1.06

31.75 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.06 1.06

31.80 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.06 1.06

31.85 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.06 1.06

31.90 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.05 1.05

31.95 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.05 1.05

32.00 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.05 1.05

32.05 0.52 0. 57 5.00 0.00 1.04 1.04

32.10 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.04 1.04

32.15 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.04 1.04

32.20 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.04 1.04

32.25 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.03 1.03

32.30 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.03 1.03

32.35 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.03 1.03

32.40 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.02 1.02

32.45 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.02 1.02

32.50 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.02 1.02

32.55 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.01 1.01

32.60 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.01 1.01

32.65 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.01 1.01

32.70 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

32.75 0.52 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

32.80 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

32.85 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.99 0.99

32.90 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.99 0.99

32.95 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.99 0.99

33.00 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.98 0.98

33.05 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.98 0.98

33.10 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.98 0.98

33.15 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.97 0.97

33.20 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.97 0.97

33.25 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.96 0.96

33.30 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.96 0.96

33.35 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.96 0.96

33.40 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.95 0.95

33.45 0.51 0.57 5.00 0.00 0.95 0.95

33.50 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.95 0.95

33.55 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.94 0.94

33.60 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.94 0.94

33.65 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.93 0.93

33.70 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.93 0.93

33.75 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.92 0.92

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

33.80 0. 51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.92 0.92

33.85 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.92 0.92

33.90 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.91 0.91

33.95 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.91 0.91

34.00 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.90 0.90

34.05 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.90 0.90

34.10 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.89 0.89

34.15 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.89 0.89

34.20 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.88 0.88

34.25 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.88 0.88
· 34.30 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.87 0.87

34.35 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.87 0.87

34.40 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.86 0.86

34.45 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.86 0.86

34.50 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.85 0.85

34.55 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.85 0.85

34.60 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.84 0.84

34.65 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.84 0.84

34.70 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.83 0.83

34.75 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.83 0.83

34.80 0.51 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.82 0.82

34.85 0.49 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.82 0.82

34.90 0.46 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.81 0.81

34.95 0.45 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.80 0.80

35.00 0.43 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.80 0.80

35.05 0.43 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.79 0.79

35.10 0.43 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.79 0.79

35.15 0.44 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.78 0.78

35.20 0.44 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.78 0.78

35.25 0.45 0.56 5.00 0.00 0. 77 0.77

35.30 0.46 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.76 0.76

35.35 0.47 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.76 0.76

35.40 0.49 0.56 5.00 0.00 0.75 0.75

35.45 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.75 0.75

35.50 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.74 0. 74

35.55 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.74 0.74

35.60 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.73 0.73

35.65 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.72 0.72

35.70 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0. 72 0.72

35.75 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.71 0.71

35.80 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.71 0.71

35.85 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.70 0.70

35.90 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.70 0.70

35.95 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.69 0.69

36.00 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.69 0.69

36.05 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.68 0.68

36.10 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.67 0.67

36.15 0. 51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.67 0.67

36.20 0. 51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.66 0.66

36.25 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.66 0.66

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

36.30 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.65 0.65

36.35 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.65 0.65

36.40 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.64 0.64

36.45 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.64 0.64

36.50 0.51 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.63 0.63

36.55 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.63 0.63

36.60 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.62 0.62

36.65 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.62 0.62

36.70 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.61 0.61

36.75 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.61 0.61

36.80 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.60 0.60

36.85 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.60 0.60

36.90 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.59 0. 59

36.95 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.59 0. 59

37.00 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.58 0.58

37.05 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.58 0.58

37.10 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.57 0.57

37.15 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.57 0.57

37.20 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.56 0.56

37.25 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.56 0.56

37.30 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.55 0.55

37.35 0.50 0.55 5.00 0.00 0.55 0.55

37.40 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.54 0.54

37.45 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.54 0.54

37.50 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.53 0.53

37.55 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.53 0.53

37.60 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.52 0.52

37.65 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.52 0.52

37.70 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.51 0.51

37.75 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.51 0.51

37.80 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.50 0. 50

37.85 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.50 0.50

37.90 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.49 0.49

37.95 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.49 0.49

38.00 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.49 0.49

38.05 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.48 0.48

38.10 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.48 0.48

38.15 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.47 0.47

38.20 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.47 0.47

38.25 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.46 0.46

38.30 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.46 0.46

38.35 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.45 0.45

38.40 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.45 0.45

38.45 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.44 0.44

38.50 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.44 0.44

38.55 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.44 0.44

38.60 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.43 0.43

38.65 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.43 0.43

38.70 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.42 0.42

38.75 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.42 0.42

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

38.80 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.41 0.41

38.85 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.41 0.41

38.90 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.41 0.41

38.95 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.40 0.40

39.00 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.40 0.40

39.05 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.39 0.39

39.10 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.39 0.39

39.15 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.38 0.38

39.20 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.38 0.38

39.25 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.38 0.38

39.30 0.50 0.54 5.00 0.00 0.37 0.37

39.35 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.37 0.37

39.40 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.36 0.36

39.45 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.36 0.36

39.50 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.36 0.36

39.55 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.35 0.35

39.60 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.35 0.35

39.65 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.34 0.34

39.70 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.34 0.34

39.75 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.34 0.34

39.80 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.33 0.33

39.85 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.33 0.33

39.90 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.32 0.32

39.95 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.32 0.32

40.00 0.50 0·.53 5.00 0.00 0.32 0.32

40.05 0.50 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.31 0.31

40.10 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.31 0.31

40.15 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.31 0.31

40.20 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.30 0.30

40.25 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.30 0.30

40.30 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.29 0.29

40.35 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.29 0.29

40.40 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.29 0.29

40.45 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.28 0.28

40.50 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.28 0.28

40.55 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.27 0.27

40.60 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.27 0.27

40.65 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.27 0.27

40.70 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.26 0.26

40.75 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.26 0.26

40.80 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.25 0.25

40.85 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.25 0.25

40.90 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.25 0.25

40.95 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.24 0.24

41.00 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.24 0.24

41.05 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.23 0.23

41.10 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.23 0.23

41.15 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.23 0.23

41.20 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.22 0.22

41.25 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.22 0.22

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

41.30 0.49 0.53 5.00 0.00 0.21 0.21

41.35 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.21 0.21

41.40 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.21 0.21

41.45 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.20 0.20

41.50 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.20 0.20

41.55 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.19 0.19

41.60 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.19 0.19

41.65 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.19 0.19

41.70 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.18 0.18

41. 75 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.18 0.18

41.80 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.17 0.17

41.85 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.17 0.17

41.90 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.17 0.17

41.95 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.16 0.16

42.00 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.16 0.16

42.05 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.15 0.15

42.10 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.15 0.15

42.15 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.15 0.15

42.20 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.14 0.14

42.25 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.14 0.14

42.30 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.13 0.13

42.35 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.13 0.13

42.40 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.12 0.12

42.45 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.12 0.12

42.50 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.12 0.12

42.55 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.11 0.11

42.60 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.11 0.11

42.65 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.10 0.10

42.70 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.10 0.10

42.75 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.10 0.10

42.80 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.09 0.09

42.85 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.09 0.09

42.90 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.08 0.08

42.95 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.08 0.08

43.00 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.08 0.08

43.05 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.07 0.07

43.10 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.07 0.07

43.15 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.06 0.06

43.20 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.06 0.06

43.25 0.49 0.52 5.00 0.00 0.05 0.05

43.30 0.49 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.05 0.05

43.35 0.49 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.05 0.05

43.40 0.49 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.05 0.05

43.45 0.49 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.05 0.05

43.50 0.49 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.04 0.04

43.55 0.49 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.04 0.04

43.60 0.48 0.5'1 5.00 0.00 0.04 0.04

43.65 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.04 0.04

43.70 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.04 0.04

43.75 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.04 0.04

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

43.80 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

43.85 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

43.90 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

43.95 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

44.00 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

44.05 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

44.10 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

44.15 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.02 0.02

44.20 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.02 0.02

44.25 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.02 0.02

44.30 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.02 0.02

44.35 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.02 0.02

44.40 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.02 0.02

44.45 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.02 0.02

44.50 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.01 0.01

44.55 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.01 0.01

44.60 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.01 0.01

44.65 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.01 0.01

44.70 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.01 0.01

44.75 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.01 0.01

44.80 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

44.85 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

44.90 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

44.95 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.00 0.48 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.05 2.00 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.10 2.00 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.15 2.00 0.51 · 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.20 2.00 0.51 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.25 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.30 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.35 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.40 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.45 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.50 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.55 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.60 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.65 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.70 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.75 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.80 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.85 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.90 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.

45.95 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.00 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.05 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.10 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.15 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.20 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.25 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

46.30 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.35 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.40 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.45 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.50 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.55 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.60 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.65 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.70 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.75 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.80 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.85 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.90 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

46.95 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.00 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.05 2.00 0. 50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.10 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.15 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.20 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.25 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.30 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.35 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.40 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.45 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.50 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.55 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.60 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.65 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.70 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.75 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.80 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.85 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.90 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.95 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.00 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.05 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.10 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.15 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.20 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.25 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.30 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.35 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.40 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.45 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.50 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.55 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.60 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.65 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.70 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.75 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

48.80 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.85 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.90 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

48.95 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.00 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.05 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.10 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.15 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.20 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.25 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.30 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.35 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.40 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.45 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.50 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.55 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.60 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.65 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.70 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.75 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.80 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.85 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.90 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.95 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.00 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.05 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.10 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.15 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.20 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.25 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.30 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.35 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.40 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.45 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.50 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.55 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.60 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.65 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.70 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.75 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.80 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.85 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.90 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

50.95 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.00 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.05 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.10 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.15 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.20 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.25 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

51. 30 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.35 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.40 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51.45 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51. 50 2.00 0.49 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
* F.S.<1, Liquefaction Potential Zone
(F.S. is limited to 5, CRR is limited to 2, CSR is limited to 2) Units: Unit: qc, fs, Stress or Pressure= atm (1.0581tsf); Unit Weight pcf; Depth= ft; Settlement= in.
1 atm (atmosphere)= 1 tsf (ton/ft2)
CR Rm Cyclic resistance ratio from soils
CSR sf Cyclic stress ratio induced by a given earthquake (with user request factor of safety)
F.S. Factor of Safety against liquefaction, F.S.=CRRm/CSRsf S_sat
S_dry
S_all
Noliq
Settlement from saturated sands
Settlement from Unsaturated Sands
Total Settlement from Saturated and Unsaturated Sands
No-Liquefy Soils

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Appendix E2 - Geotechnical Investigation (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) ~ s lad ~=~,c~ ~.~},~~=~! ~~760) 86)-0713 F~(760) 863-0841 July 30, 2021
6782 Stanton Avenue, Suite C, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369 450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 Fax (951) 845-8863 www.Sladdenengineering.com
Project No. 644-21002
21-07-083
Richland Developers, Inc.
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 425
Irvine, California
Project:

Subject:

Ref:

Proposed Residential Development
North of Cottonwood Avenue &
East of Lyon Avenue
TIM38202
APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014
San Jacinto, California
Plan Review - Restricted Use Zone
Geologic Hazards Evaluation report, prepared by Sladden Engineering dated May 19, 2003; Project No. 444-3021, Report No. 03-05-317.

Geotechnical Investigation report, prepared by Sladden Engineering dated March 26, 2021; Project No. 644-21002, Report No. 21-03-030.

Tentative Tract Map No. 38202, prepared by Blaine A. Womer Civil Engineering, Sheet No 1 of 1, dated July 2021.

In accordance with your request, we have reviewed Tentative Tract Map No 38202 prepared by Blaine A. Womer Civil Engineering for the residential development proposed for the property located north of Cottonwood Avenue and east of Lyon Avenue (APN 436-280-011, 012, 013 & 014) in the City of San Jacinto, California. Based on our review, it is our opinion that the Restricted Use Zone (RUZ) provided in the above referenced reports has been properly incorporated into Tentative Tract Map 38202. The referenced reports adequately address the risk associated with primary surface ground rupture and additional fault hazard investigations should not be necessary.

If you have questions regarding this memo or the referenced report, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,

SLADDEN EN GIN RING
Principal Geologist
Letter/me
Sladden Engineering
www.Sladdenengineering.com

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Appendix E3 - Plan Review - Restricted Use Zone (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

LYON AVENUE APPALOOSA DRIVE
MARILYN DR. LEE ANN CIR. CHRISTA CIR. SYKES DR. 436-280-016 436-280-017 436-280-018 436-280-019 436-280-022 436-280-021 436-280-015 MONTE VISTA MIDDLE SCHOOL 436-280-010 TRACT 31097 TRACT 29384 COTTONWOOD AVE. 434225247LOT 'I'
MB346/5-8 ESTRELLA ST. SEE DETAIL 'A' CL CL ESTRELLA STREET CL CL

MARILYN
DRIVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 38202 CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEAL DIG ALERT FOR W.O. SCALE BENCHMARK: DATE DATE CITY APPR. CHECKED BY: BY MARK ENGINEER REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DATE DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. FILE NO. R.C.E. NO. 1 APPROVED BY: EXP. DATE DATE PREPARED BY: DATE CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. NO. EXP. DATE OF 1 SHEETS BLAINE A. WOMER CIVIL ENGINEERING Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347 Park City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302, Phone/Fax (435)615-1489 BWA 46354 JA BRAY, LLC / JS BRAY, LLC 1" = 100' JULY 2021 1" = 100' 0 100 200 300 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38202 IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DETAIL 'A' 4.1.r Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Appendix E3 - Plan Review - Restricted Use Zone (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Your Property. Our Priority.

Making a better future for all the communities we touch. www.HillmannConsulting.com

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
291 North Lyon Avenue
San Jacinto, California 92582
Prepared For:

JS Bray, LLC & JA Bray, LLC
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite #425
Irvine, California 92612
November 23, 2021
Hillmann Project Number C3-8749

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Your Property. Our Priority.

Making a better future for all the communities we touch. www.HillmannConsulting.com
November 23, 2021
Mr. William R. Inghram
JS Bray, LLC & JA Bray, LLC
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite #425
Irvine, California 92612
RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
291 North Lyon Avenue
San Jacinto, California 92582
Hillmann Project No: C3-8749
Dear Mr. Inghram:

Hillmann Consulting LLC is pleased to provide the results of our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the above referenced property. This assessment was performed in general accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13, which is the latest version of the E1527 standard published by the ASTM.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental due diligence services. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact our office at 714-634-9500.

Sincerely,
Hillmann Consulting, LLC
Gabriela Cyrulik Ryan Terwilliger
Project Manager Western Operations Manager

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -i- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................1

1.1 Summary of Project Details .........................................................................................................................1

1.2 Findings Summary Table .............................................................................................................................2

1.3 Findings and Conclusions ............................................................................................................................2

1.4 Business Environmental Risks / Non-ASTM Scope ....................................................................................4

2.0 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................5

2.1 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................................................................5

2.2 Property Location/Legal Description ...........................................................................................................7

2.3 Data Gaps.....................................................................................................................................................7

2.4 User Reliance ...............................................................................................................................................8

2.5 Significant Assumptions ..............................................................................................................................8

2.6 General Limitations and Exceptions ............................................................................................................8

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ........................................................................................11

3.1 Prior Environmental Reports/Documentation ............................................................................................11

3.2 User Questionnaire.....................................................................................................................................11

3.3 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA ..........................................................................................................12

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW...................................................................................................................13

4.1 Physical Setting Sources ............................................................................................................................13

4.2 Historical Use – Property and Adjoining Properties ..................................................................................13

4.3 Standard Environmental Record Sources...................................................................................................17

4.4 Additional Environmental Record Sources................................................................................................21

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................................23

5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions......................................................................................................23

5.2 General Site Setting....................................................................................................................................23

5.3 Interior & Exterior Observations................................................................................................................24

6.0 INTERVIEWS..............................................................................................................................27

6.1 Interviews with Past and Present Owners and Occupants..........................................................................27

6.2 Interviews with State and/or Local Government Officials.........................................................................27

7.0 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS ..................................................................................28

7.1 Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) .......................................................................................................28

7.2 Lead-Based Paint........................................................................................................................................28

7.3 Radon .........................................................................................................................................................28

7.4 Mold/Microbial Damage ............................................................................................................................28

7.5 NWI Mapped Wetlands..............................................................................................................................29

7.6 Lead in Drinking Water..............................................................................................................................29

8.0 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................30

9.0 APPENDICES ..............................................................................................................................31 Appendix A Site Diagram/Vicinity Map
Appendix B Site Photographs
Appendix C Questionnaires / User Provided Information
Appendix D Historical Records Documentation
Appendix E Regulatory Records Documentation
Appendix F Other Documents / Lab Results
Appendix G Project Personnel Qualifications

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -ii- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
List of Abbreviations/Acronyms
Hillmann may use the following abbreviations and acronyms for common terminology described in our report. Not all abbreviations or acronyms may be applicable to this report:

ACM – Asbestos Containing Material
AOC – Area of Concern
AST – Aboveground Storage Tank
ASTM – American Society for Testing Materials
BER – Business Environmental Risk
CEA – Classification Exception Area
CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act CERCLIS – Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System CESQG – Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
COC – Chemicals of Concern
CORRACTS – Corrective Action Sites
CREC – Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition
DNPL – Delisted National Priority List
DTSC – Department of Toxic Substances Control
ENG – Engineering
ERNS – Emergency Response Notification System
FDEP – Florida Department of Environmental Protection
FDNY – Fire Department, City of New York
FDOT – Florida Department of Transportation
FOI/FOIA/FOIL – Freedom of Information / Freedom of Information Act / Freedom of Information Letter HVAC – Heating Ventilation & Air Conditioning
HREC – Historic Recognized Environmental Condition
IAQ – Indoor Air Quality
ISRA – Industrial Site Recovery Act
LBP – Lead-Based Paint
LQG – Large Quantity Generator
LTANK – Leaking Storage Tank
LUST – Leaking Underground Storage Tank
MassDEP – Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection SDS/MSDS – Safety Data Sheet / Material Safety Data Sheet NA – Not Applicable
NCDOH – Nassau County Department of Health
NFA – No Further Action
NFRAP – No Further Remedial Actions Planned
NJDEP – New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NPDES – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL – National Priority List
NYCDEP – New York City Department of Environmental Protection NYCDOB – New York City Department of Buildings
NYCOER – New York City Office of Environmental Remediation NYSDEC – New York State Department of Environmental Conservation OPRA – Open Public Records Act
PADEP – Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection PAH – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
PCE – Perchloroethylene
RAO – Response Action Outcome
RCRA – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RCRIS – Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System REC – Recognized Environmental Condition
RWQCB – Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAQMD – South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCDHS – Suffolk County Department of Health Services
SDG – Significant Data Gap
SEMS – Superfund Enterprise Management System
SRP – Site Remediation Program
SQG – Small Quantity Generator
SVOC – Semi-Volatile Organic Compound
TCE – Trichloroethylene
TSDF – Treatment Storage and/or Disposal Facility
USEPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency
UST – Underground Storage Tank
VEC – Vapor Encroachment Condition
VOC – Volatile Organic Compound

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -1- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

1.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS
Hillmann Consulting, LLC (Hillmann) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California (the Property). The assessment has been conducted in accordance with our contracted scope of work and the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Final Rule 40 CFR Part 312. This section contains a summary of findings, opinions and conclusions made by this assessment. However, this section, alone, does not constitute the complete assessment. The report must be read in its entirety.

1.1 Summary of Project Details
Primary Street Address: 291 North Lyon Avenue
City: San Jacinto County: Riverside State: California
Tax ID/Parcel Number: 436-280-011, 436-280-012, 436-280-013, and 436-280-014 Property Owner: Ja Bray
Zoning Designation: Agricultural/vacant land
Approx. Property Area: 26.6 acres
Buildings/# of Floors N/A
Approx. Building Area: N/A
Approx. Year Built: 1968
Commercial Occupants: None - vacant
Current Use: None - vacant
Prior Uses: Agricultural, orchards, dairy farm
Inspected By: Ms. Gabriela Cyrulik
Site Contact/Company: Mr. William Inghram
Site Escort/Company: Unescorted
Inspection Date: November 19, 2021
Weather Conditions: Sunny, 85 degrees F

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -2- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

1.2 Findings Summary Table
Assessment Subject No
REC REC CREC HREC Rpt.Ref.

Property Regulatory Records Review: X 4.3
Property Historical Records Review: X 4.2
Bulk Petroleum Storage: X 5.3
On-Site Operations: X 5.3
On-Site Haz-Mat Storage/Use/Spills: X 5.3
Transformers/Hydraulic Systems: X 5.3
Waste Discharges: X 5.3
Interviews: X 6.0
Adjoining & Nearby Properties: X

4.3 5.2
Prior Env. Reports/User Provided Info: X 3.0
Data Gaps: X 2.3

1.3 Findings, Opinions and Conclusions

1.3.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions
Hillmann has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of the Property as described in Section 2 of this report. Any additions to, exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are also described in Section 2 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property, except for the following:

RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
REC #1 The Property appears to have been historically utilized as agricultural land since approximately 1938 to early 1960s. Due to a concern of shallow soil impacts resulting from cumulative applications of pesticides at the site, the historic agricultural use is considered to be a REC in connection with the Property.

HISTORICAL RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
No HRECs were identified.

CONTROLLED RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
No CRECs were identified.

SIGNIFICANT DATA GAPS
No SDGs were identified.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -3- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

1.3.2 REC Response Action Recommendations
The following table presents recommended response actions to the identified RECs for further investigation and/or corrective action:

REC RESPONSE ACTION SUMMARY TABLE
REC Response Action
REC #1 A Limited Phase II Investigation

1.3.3 Notable Environmental Conditions / De Minimis Conditions The following environmental conditions were identified, but are not considered to be a REC in connection with the Property:

NOTABLE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS / DE MINIMIS CONDITIONS

1. The Property appears to have been historically utilized as agricultural land since approximately 1938 to early 1960s. The Property appears to have been developed with a residential structure at the northwest corner of the Property circa 1967, and farm structures/horse ranch to the central and southeast boundary of the Property since approximately 1970s until 2002. The historic agricultural use of the Property is considered to be a REC in connection with the Property.

2. Lyon Avenue / New Elementary Schools at 425 North Lyon Avenue is listed on the ENVRIOSTOR, SCH, CERS databases. The site is adjacent to the north-northwest and is down-gradient relative to the Property. The ENVIROSTOR listing indicated that the site is on a “School Cleanup” database, with a “Certified” status as of 01/21/2020. Online records reviewed indicated that soil was contaminated at the site from historical agricultural activities with chlordane and lead being detected at the northeast and southwest corner of the former structure. In October 2018, based on the soil samples and PEA results DTSC had determined that Removal Action was necessary and approximately 140 cubic yards of Chlordane impacted soil were excavated and transferred off-site. Air monitoring and dust control measures were conducted and implemented during the soil removal; additionally, seven (7) confirmation soil samples were taken to confirm the results were below remedial action. Based on the “Certified” and “Closed” status this listing does not indicate a REC with connection to the Property.

3. Hillmann observed minor trash and debris present along the eastern and western boundary of the Property. All trash and debris are a de minimis condition and does not represent a REC with connection to the Property.

1.3.4 Environmental Professional Statement
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. ________________________________
Ryan Terwilliger
Environmental Professional

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -4- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

1.4 Business Environmental Risks / Non-ASTM Scope
Hillmann has performed a limited review of the following potential Business Environmental Risks (BER), also known as “Non-ASTM Scope concerns”, in accordance with the contracted scope of work scope for this assessment. The following is a summary of findings for applicable BERs. For a more detailed discussion of the findings and contracted scope of work, please see the referenced report section.

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS / NON-ASTM SCOPE
Subject Findings Not
Appl.

Rpt.

Ref.

Asbestos X 7.1
Lead Paint X 7.2
Radon Property is located in the USEPA radon designation Zone 2 or 'moderate risk' area for radon.

7.3 Mold /
Microbial
Damage
X 7.4
NWI
Wetlands
No mapped wetland areas were depicted at the Property. 7.5 Lead in
Drinking
Water
X 7.6

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -5- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Purpose and Scope
This assessment was conducted utilizing generally accepted Phase I ESA industry standards in accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. The ASTM describes these methodologies as representing good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”): that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses the property consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35) (B). The primary goal of the processes established by ASTM E1527-13 is to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property.

The term recognized environmental condition (REC) is defined by the ASTM as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at a property: (1) due to a release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.

The ASTM has also defined the terms historical recognized environmental conditions and controlled recognized environmental conditions as two additional types of RECs. The term historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) is defined as a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the Property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the Property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls or engineering controls).

The term controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) is defined as a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.

Conditions determined to be “de minimis conditions” are not considered to be RECs, HRECs or CRECs. De minimis condition is defined by the ASTM, “…as a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.” The chief components of this assessment are generally described as follows:
• A non-invasive visual reconnaissance of the Property and adjoining properties in accordance with ASTM guidelines for evidence of RECs.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -6- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
• Interviews of past and present owners and occupants and state and local government officials, seeking information related to the potential presence of RECs at the Property. • A review of standard physical record sources for available topographic, geologic and groundwater data.
• A review of standard historic record sources, such as fire insurance maps, city directories, aerial photographs, prior reports and interviews, etc., to determine prior uses of the Property from the present, back to the Property’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier.
• A review of standard environmental record sources including federal and state environmental databases, and additional environmental record sources, to identify potential regulatory concerns with the Property, adjoining properties and properties located within the surrounding area.

An evaluation of environmental or other regulatory compliance matters is excluded from the scope of this assessment.

These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an Environmental Site Assessment of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions.

2.1.1 Business Environmental Risks/Non-ASTM Scope Considerations In accordance with our contract agreement, Hillmann may have addressed the following potential environmental subject matters that are outside of the requirements of the ASTM E1527-13 standard:

Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM): A cursory non-intrusive visual screening for the presence of suspect ACM within the accessed areas of buildings built prior to 1990 on the Property. It is emphasized that this cursory non-intrusive visual screening does not constitute an asbestos survey/inspection of the premises. An asbestos survey/inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if more certainty is desired regarding ACM and potential asbestos hazards at the Property.

Furthermore, a review of regulatory compliance matters pertaining to asbestos is excluded from the scope of work.

Lead-Based Paint (LBP): A cursory non-intrusive visual screening of the condition of painted surfaces in the accessed areas of residential buildings/units built prior to 1980 on the Property. It is emphasized that this cursory non-intrusive visual screening does not constitute a comprehensive survey for LBP or potential lead hazards. A comprehensive inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if more certainty is desired regarding LBP at the Property.

Furthermore, a review of regulatory compliance matters pertaining to lead-based paint is excluded from the scope of work.

USEPA Designated Radon Potential: Review of general non-site specific data published by the USEPA regarding the Radon Zone classification for the area of the Property.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -7- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
Mold/Microbial Damage: A cursory non-intrusive visual screening within the accessed areas of buildings on the Property for evidence of systemic microbial problems, including visible mold growth, water damaged building materials or musty odors. It is emphasized that this cursory nonintrusive visual screening does not constitute a comprehensive survey for moisture/mold/microbial damage. A more comprehensive inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if more certainty is desired regarding the potential for moisture/mold/microbial damages at the Property.

NWI Wetlands: Review of US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory digitized data of mapped wetlands as presented in the attached EDR Radius Map plus Geocheck Report.

It is emphasized that, regardless of the wetlands data obtained via the EDR Geocheck-Physical Setting Source Addendum, a delineation of regulated wetlands by a qualified professional would be warranted to determine the presence or absence of regulated wetlands at the Property.

Lead in Drinking Water: Review of the potential for elevated levels of lead in the drinking water by determining the source of the drinking water supply and a review of available testing or compliance data reports.

2.2 Property Location/Legal Description
Property location and legal description details are described as follows:

Primary Street Address: 291 North Lyon Avenue
City: San Jacinto County: Riverside State: California
Tax ID/Parcel Number: 436-280-011, 436-280-012, 436-280-013, and 436-280-014 Approx. Land Area: 26.6 acres
Apprx. Latitude/Longitude: North 33.790508 degrees/West 116.987446 degrees Additional Details (if appl.): NA
Property Owner: Ja Bray
Zoning Designation: Agricultural/vacant land

2.3 Data Gaps
A data gap is defined by the ASTM as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information.

A data gap is only significant if other information and/or professional experience raises reasonable concerns involving the data gap and the ability to determine the presence or absence of recognized environmental conditions. The following table summarizes data gaps encountered during the assessment as well as a discussion of their significance.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -8- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
Data Gap: Significant
(Yes/No)?
Discussion
Historical records data failure No The date and/or type of the first developed use of the Property was not documented.

Record gaps exceeding five years were encountered; however, no significant site use changes are suspected during these intervals.

Response to agency records
requests not received as of date
of report.

No Any additional information indicative of a REC will be forwarded upon receipt.

2.4 User Reliance
This report is for the exclusive use of the User(s) named on the front cover. No other party(ies) shall have any right to rely on the content of this report without first obtaining the consent of the original report User; and without obtaining written consent from Hillmann in the form of a letter of reliance or report recertification.

2.5 Significant Assumptions
The following significant assumptions are made:
• The site operations at the time of the site visit are assumed to reflect typical site conditions relative to potential environmental conditions and that no concealment of environmental conditions or releases by site owners or occupants has occurred. Likewise, it is assumed that no areas of the Property with potential environmental concerns or RECs were concealed or otherwise not reported, intentionally or unknowingly, by the Property owners/occupants and/or site escort at the time of the site visit.
• For the purpose of estimating the approximate direction of groundwater flow in the absence of site specific groundwater data, unless indicated otherwise, an assumption has been made that the gradient of groundwater flow follows the surface topography of the Property and immediate surrounding area.

2.6 General Limitations and Exceptions

2.6.1 Limitations
The report turnaround time specified by the contract agreement for this assessment may present a limitation to the availability of pertinent regulatory agency records. Such limitations, if encountered, are further specified in Section 4.4.

Significant limitations related to the condition or accessibility of the Property at the time of the site reconnaissance, if encountered, are reported in Section 5.1.

2.6.2 Other Exceptions or Deletions
No other exceptions or deletions from the ASTM Standard E1527-13 are reported.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -9- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

2.6.3 Special Terms and Conditions
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared using reasonable efforts in each phase of its work to identify recognized environmental conditions associated with hazardous substances, wastes and petroleum products at the Property. Findings within this report are based on information collected from observations made on the day of the site reconnaissance and from reasonably ascertainable information obtained from governing public agencies and private sources.

This report is not definitive and should not be assumed to be a complete or specific definition of the conditions above or below grade. Information in this report is not intended to be used as a construction document and should not be used for demolition, renovation, site development, redevelopment, or other construction purposes. No representation or warranty is made that the past or current operations at the Property are, or have been, in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes.

Findings, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on visual observations of the Property, interviews conducted, the records reviewed, information provided by the Client, and/or a review of readily available and supplied drawings and documents.

Information obtained during the assessment, whether written, graphic or verbal, provided by the Property contact(s) or as shown on any documents reviewed or received from the Property contact, owner or agent, or government agency source; is assumed to be accurate except as specifically stated otherwise in this report. Independent verification of the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received during the course of this assessment is not made and excluded from the scope of work for this assessment. No warranty or guarantee is made of the accuracy or completeness of information that was obtained from ostensibly knowledgeable individuals, regulatory agency representatives or other secondary sources.

Regardless of the findings stated in this report, Hillmann is not responsible for consequences or conditions arising from facts that were concealed, withheld or not fully disclosed at the time the assessment was conducted.

This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.

The regulatory database report provided is based on an evaluation of the data collected and compiled by a contracted data research company. The regulatory research is designed to meet the requirements of ASTM Standard E1527-13. Hillmann can neither warrant nor guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information obtained from the regulatory database report provider during the course of this assessment.

Subsurface conditions may differ from the conditions implied by the surface observations and can only be reliably evaluated through intrusive techniques.

Reasonable efforts have been made during this assessment to identify aboveground and underground storage tanks and ancillary equipment. Reasonable efforts are limited to information gained from visual observation of largely unobstructed areas, recorded database information held

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -10- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
in public record and available information gathered from interviews. Such methods may not identify surficial and subsurface features that may have been hidden from view due to parked automobiles and other vehicles, snow cover, vegetative growth, pavement, construction or debris pile storage or incorrect information from sources.

No guarantee, explicit or implied, is made that the records pertaining to historical ownership or occupancy which were reviewed represent a comprehensive or precise delineation of past Property ownership or tenancy for legal purposes.

The ASTM E1527-13 standard states that recommendations are not required to be included in a Phase I ESA report; however, further that recommendations are an additional service that may be useful in the User’s analysis of landowner liability protections or business environmental risks; and that the User should consider whether recommendations for additional inquiries or other services are desired.

The recommended response actions to the identified RECs presented in Section 1.3, if any, are not intended to represent the only course(s) of action to take; nor does it imply any opinion as to the timing of the action. Furthermore, it is emphasized that additional response actions may become warranted depending on the outcome of the initial action(s) taken. Hillmann advises that consultation with legal counsel familiar with environmental and real estate law may be beneficial to the decision making process for the type and timing of a response action to identified RECs, if any.

Due to the limited nature of our review of potential Business Environmental Risks, the User of the report should consider whether to take additional action(s) to further define, properly manage and/or mitigate potential BERs.

In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this report and the terms and conditions of the consulting services agreement for this project, the consulting services agreement shall control.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -11- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
The term “User” is defined by ASTM as the party seeking to use Practice E1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the Property; specifically, the entities named on the front cover to which the report has been addressed.

3.1 Prior Environmental Reports/Documentation
No prior environmental reports/documentation were provided.

3.2 User Questionnaire
Section 6 of the ASTM E1527-13 standard describes certain tasks required to be performed by the report User in order to qualify for landowner liability protections to CERCLA liability. To assist the report User to meet these requirements, the ASTM E1527-13 standard recommends a questionnaire of inquiries (User Questionnaire) specified in 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30, and 312.31 be provided to the original report User. The following is a summary of the User’s response:

Question: Yes/No: Detail:

Environmental liens that are filed or recorded against the property:

Did a search of recorded land title records identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law?
No
Activity and use limitations that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded against the property:

Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? No
Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP:

Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and
processes used by this type of business?
No
Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated:

Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property?
Yes
Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable
Information:

Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -12- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
Question: Yes/No: Detail:
environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example,
-Do you know the past uses of the property? Yes
-Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or were once present at the property? No
-Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? No
-Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? No
The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation:

Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property?
No
Litigation/Administrative Proceedings/Government Notices As the User of this ESA, do you have knowledge of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the property; and (3) any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products.

No
NR-no response

3.3 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA
The User did not indicate the purpose of the assessment. In accordance with ASTM E1527-13, it is assumed that the Phase I ESA was being performed in order to qualify for landowner liability protection to CERCLA liability.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -13- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW

4.1 Physical Setting Sources
The following physical setting sources were reviewed:

Source Discussion
USGS 7.5 minute
Topographic Map
Data: (EDR GeocheckPhysical Setting Source
Addendum)
The Property lies at an elevation of approximately 1,511 feet above mean sea level. An interpretation of topographic contour lines as well as a review of the EDR GeocheckGeneral Topographic Gradient suggested terrain sloping downward towards the north.

The closest down gradient water body is San Jacinto Reservoir, located approximately 1,972 feet to the northwest.

USDA SCS Soil Data:
(EDR Geocheck-Physical
Setting Source Addendum)
The soil type at the Property is classified as “Dello”. This soil type is described as moderate infiltration rates, deep and moderately deep well and well drained soils with loamy fine sand textures.

Geologic Data:
(EDR Geocheck-Physical
Setting Source Addendum)
The geologic formation in the vicinity of the Property is described as a stratified sequence of the Cenozoic Era, Tertiary System, and Pliocene Rocks Series.

Prior Env. Reports:
(Section 3.1)
No prior environmental reports were obtained.

Additional Sources/
Data:

No additional physical setting sources or data was obtained.

Groundwater Flow
Discussion:

Based on a review of the above information as well as observation of the site, the direction of shallow groundwater flow at the site is inferred to be towards the north.

NWI Wetlands Data:
(EDR Geocheck-Physical
Setting Source Addendum)
No NWI mapped wetlands areas were depicted at the Property.

4.2 Historical Use – Property and Adjoining Properties
Research has been conducted in an attempt to develop a history of the previous uses of the property and surrounding area, in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the property. Standard historical sources have been sought in an attempt to document the past uses of the Property as far back as it can be shown that the Property contained structures; or from the time the Property was first used for residential, agricultural, commercial, industrial or governmental purposes.

4.2.1 Fire Insurance Maps
A Certified Sanborn Map Report was obtained from EDR for a review of published historic fire insurance maps for the Property and surrounding area. The following is a summary of site uses and notable details depicted by the available maps:

Year(s) Prop/Adj Depicted Use(s) Notable Details
(No
Coverage)
Property:

Adjoining:

A copy of the Certified Sanborn Map Report is attached in Appendix D.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -14- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

4.2.2 City Directories
An EDR City Directory Abstract report was reviewed for data of former occupants of the Property’s street address. The following is a generalized summary of the findings of city directory research for past occupants of the Property.

Property
Use(s) / Occupant(s): Years
None identified
The EDR City Directory Abstract report was also reviewed for listings of historic occupants of the adjoining properties. The following is a general summary of listings of historic adjoining property occupants:

Adjoining Properties
Use and/or Occupant(s) Years
Residential 1992 - 2017
A copy of the EDR City Directory report is attached in Appendix D.

4.2.3 Historical Topographic Maps
Historical topographic maps of the Property and vicinity obtained from an EDR Historical Topographic Map report (as attached in Appendix D) have been reviewed. The following interpretation of land usage was made by review of the maps:

Year(s) Summary
1901
Property: No improvements and/or special features are depicted Adjoining: No improvements and/or special features are depicted 1943, 1948,
1853, 1956
Property: No improvements and/or special features are depicted Adjoining: Structure is adjacent to the southwest
1967, 1972,
1979, 1996
Property: Two (2) purple structures are depicted at the northwest corner of the Property, indicating building development
Adjoining: Multiple purple structures are adjacent to the northwest, southwest, and south indicating building development
2012
Property: No improvements and/or special features are depicted Adjoining: No improvements and/or special features are depicted

4.2.4 Historical Aerial Photographs
Historical aerial photographs of the Property and vicinity obtained from an EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package report, as attached in Appendix D, were reviewed. The following interpretation of land usage was made by review of the aerial photographs:

Year(s) Summary of Interpretation
1938, 1949, Property: The Property appears to be agricultural land

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -15- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
1953 Adjoining: Agricultural land with multiple residential structures is adjacent to the westsouthwest. 1961
Property: The Property appears to be agricultural land.

Adjoining: Agricultural land with multiple residential structures are adjacent to the westsouthwest, west-northwest, and east 1967, 1975
Property: The Property appears to be developing with a residential structure on the northwestern corner, with agricultural land on the eastern boundary of the Property Adjoining: Agricultural land with multiple residential structures are adjacent to the westsouthwest, west-northwest, north, and east. 1978, 1985
Property: The eastern boundary of the Property appears to be developed with multiple sheds and/or structures located on the central-eastern perimeter of the Property, indicating the Property was utilized as a horse and/or cattle breeding stud farm. A residential structure is located at the northwest corner of the Property. Undeveloped land to the south.

Adjoining: Agricultural land with multiple residential structures are adjacent to the westsouthwest, west-northwest, north, and east. 1989, 1996,
2002
Property: The eastern boundary of the Property appears to be developed with multiple sheds and/or structures located on the central-eastern perimeter of the Property, indicating the Property was utilized as a horse and/or cattle breeding stud farm. A residential structure is located at the northwest corner of the Property. The southern boundary of the Property appears to be developed with a structure and/or stable, with open fields and tall trees.

Adjoining: Agricultural land with multiple residential structures are adjacent to the westsouthwest, west-northwest, north, and south. 2006, 2009,
2012, 2016
Property: Undeveloped land.

Adjoining: Residential structures are adjacent to the east-northeast, south, west-southwest, south, and northwest; undeveloped land to the north.

4.2.5 EDR High-Risk Historical Records
The EDR Radius Map™ report, which is discussed in greater detail in Section 4.3, provided a search of proprietary databases of potential historical high-risk uses at or in the vicinity of the Property. These databases include EDR Historic Cleaners – a database of property addresses with records of historical occupancy by suspected cleaners businesses; EDR Historic Auto – a database of property addresses with records of historical occupancy by potential automotive gas/filling stations and repair facilities; and EDR MGP- a database of sites historically occupied by manufactured gas plants and related facilities.

EDR Database On-site Listings: Adjoining/Off-Site Listings Historic Cleaners:
(on-site/adjoining only)
None None
Historic Auto:
(on-site/adjoining only)
None None
MGP:
(1-mile distance)
None None

4.2.6 Petroleum/Natural Gas Well Review
The historical record sources and the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) online mapping application were reviewed for records of historic petroleum and/or natural gas wells at the Property. No record of any historical petroleum/natural gas wells at or adjoining the Property was identified.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -16- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

4.2.7 Additional Historical Data
Where applicable, the following additional pertinent historical data was obtained:

Interviews/Anecdotal: No additional pertinent historical data was obtained.

Local Gov’t Records: No additional pertinent historical data was obtained.

Prior Env. Reports:
(Section 3.1)
Not applicable; no prior reports were provided.

Site Observations: Indications of historic uses of the Property or adjoining properties were not observed during the site reconnaissance.

Other Sources: No additional pertinent historical data was obtained.

4.2.8 Summary of Identified Historic Uses
The following table presents a summary of the types and approximate date ranges of identified prior uses of the Property:

Property
Date Range Use
1938 to 196 Agricultural land
1967 to 2002 Residential structure with horse stables, and sheds 2006 to present Vacant land
The following table presents a summary of the types of identified prior uses of the adjoining properties:

Adjoining Properties
Date Range Use
1938 to 2000s Agricultural land
1938 to present Residential

4.2.9 Historical Records Data Failure
The ASTM E1527-13 standard defines data failure as a failure to achieve the ASTM specified historical research objectives after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. The objective is to identify all obvious uses of the property from the present, back to the property’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier.

Furthermore, records of historic use/conditions should be sought in intervals no less than approximately five years, unless the property conditions appear unchanged over a longer interval.

Objective Met? Detail Significant?
First developed use/date
determined?
No The first developed use of the Property was a small
dwelling built circa 1968.

Yes
Record sources at 5-year
intervals back to 1940 or first
developed use?
Yes Historical record gaps exceeding five years were
encountered. However, significant site-use changes or
undiscovered site uses appear unlikely to have
occurred during the record gaps.

No
All obvious prior uses
identified?
Yes See Section 4.2.8. Yes

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -17- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
Please refer to Section 2.3 for additional discussion of data gaps and their significance to the findings of the assessment.

4.2.10 Historic Uses REC Discussion
The review of historical records indicated evidence of the following potential RECs in connection with the Property:

The Property appears to have been historically utilized as agricultural land since approximately 1938 to early 1960s. Due to a concern of shallow soil impacts resulting from cumulative applications of pesticides at the site, the historic agricultural use is considered to be a REC in connection with the Property.

The Property appears to have been developed with a residential structure at the northwest corner of the Property, and a horse ranch with multiple stables present along the central boundary of the Property since approximately late 1960s until 2002.

4.3 Standard Environmental Record Sources
A regulatory database report, titled EDR Radius Map™ Report, prepared by Environmental Data Resources of Shelton, CT was obtained and reviewed. The report provided a search of standard environmental record sources for listings of the Property, adjoining properties and sites within the surrounding area; and has been reviewed for the purpose of identifying listings suggesting a potential impact to the Property due to presence or migration of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products. Additional descriptions of the meaning and significance of the regulatory databases can be found in the regulatory database report in Appendix E. The EDR Radius Map™ Report provided a search of the following database categories in accordance with the requirements of the ASTM Standard E1527-13:

Regulatory Database Search
Distance
Fed. National Priorities List (NPL/a.k.a. “Superfund” sites) & Proposed NPL 1-mile Fed. Delisted NPL ½-mile
Fed. Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS; formerly CERCLIS) ½-mile Fed. SEMS-ARCHIVE (formerly known as CERCLIS NFRAP) ½-mile Fed. RCRA Corrective Action Sites (CORRACTS) 1-mile
Fed. RCRA Transport/Storage/Disposal (TSD) sites ½-mile Fed. RCRA Generators (LQG, SGQ & CESQG) Site & Adjoining Fed. Institutional Control/Engineering Control (IC/EC) Registries Site only Fed. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) Site only State/Tribal Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) 1-mile
State/Tribal Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal (LF/SWF) ½-mile State/Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks ½-mile
State/Tribal Registered Storage Tanks Site & Adjoining
State/Tribal IC/EC Registries Site
State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites ½-mile
State/Tribal Brownfields ½-mile
Additional Federal, State, Tribal and Local Environmental Databases Variable

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -18- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
Reported distances for adjoining listings discussed in Section 4.3.4, if applicable, are approximate and indicative of the presence of a public roadway or right-of-way between the adjoining site and Property.

The reported gradients indicated where applicable in Sections 4.3.4 and 4.3.5 have been estimated based on a number of factors including but not necessarily limited to field observation, review of topographic maps, database listing details and/or site specific geo-technical data.

4.3.1 Supplemental Database Listings
The regulatory database report was also reviewed for listings on supplemental databases, in addition to the Standard Environmental Record Sources. Any property or adjoining property listings on such databases of significant concern, if identified, is discussed in Sections 4.3.3 and

4.3.4. Otherwise, none of the other supplemental database listings identified by the regulatory database report are considered to be a REC in connection with the Property.

4.3.2 Limited Tier I Vapor Encroachment Screening
Limited analysis of the details of on-site, adjoining and vicinity database sites was conducted to identify potential sources of sub-surface vapor encroachment. This review was based on elements of the ASTM “Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions” (ASTM E 2600-15); and also on elements of “Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources” (Buonicore, 2011-S-103-AWMA). Vicinity database sites pertaining to non-petroleum product releases within 1,760 feet of the Property in the up-gradient direction, 365 feet of the Property in the cross gradient direction and 100 feet of the Property in the down gradient direction; and vicinity database sites pertaining to petroleum product releases within 528 feet of the Property in the up-gradient direction, 165 feet of the Property in the cross gradient direction and 100 feet of the Property in the down gradient direction were reviewed to identify active contamination sites with the potential to affect subsurface vapor conditions at the subject property. The potential for vapor encroachment was considered in assessing whether or not a REC exists in connection with the Property when reviewing applicable sites within those distances.

Regulatory database sites with active petroleum or non-petroleum releases that are considered to constitute a vapor encroachment condition (VEC) to the Property, if any, are identified and discussed in Sections 4.3.3, 4.3.4 and 4.3.5.

4.3.3 Property Listings
The following listings of the Property were identified:

Name/Address: None
Database(s):

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -19- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

4.3.4 Adjoining Property Listings
The following adjoining property listings were identified. Reported distances, where applicable, are approximate and indicative of the presence of a public roadway or right-of-way between the adjoining site and Property. The reported gradient has been estimated based on a number of factors including but not necessarily limited to field observation, review of topographic maps, database listing details and/or site specific geo-technical data.

Name/Address: Lyon Avenue/ New Elementary Schools/ 425 North Lyon Avenue Database(s): ENVRIOSTOR, SCH, CERS
Distance in feet: 645 Direction: NNW Gradient: Up
Data Discussion: The ENVIROSTOR listing indicated that the site is on a “School Cleanup” database, with a “Certified” status as of 01/21/2020. Online records reviewed indicated that soil was contaminated at the site from historical agricultural activities with chlordane and lead being detected at the northeast and southwest corner of the former structure. In October 2018, based on the soil samples and PEA results DTSC had determined that Removal Action was necessary and approximately 140 cubic yards of Chlordane impacted soil were excavated and transferred off-site. Air monitoring and dust control measures were conducted and implemented during the soil removal; additionally, seven (7) confirmation soil samples were taken to confirm the results were below remedial action. Based on the “Certified” and “Closed” status this listing does not indicate a REC with connection to the Property.

REC Discussion: Based on the details provided above, a REC is not suspected in connection with the Property.

VEC Discussion: Based on the available data, a VEC is not suspected.

4.3.5 ASTM Search Distance Findings
The following is a discussion of non-adjoining sites identified as located within the ASTM specified search distance surrounding the Property. In order to keep this discussion informative and concise, discussion(s) is/are provided of the listed site(s) for each database category that appears most likely to impact the Property based on distance, area topography and/or regulatory status. Listings of sites within the applicable search distances not specifically discussed below were reviewed and concluded not to be RECs in connection with the Property or VECs based on various factors including distance, area topography, known or inferred groundwater flow direction and/or regulatory status. Listings for the following databases, if identified, have been discussed above in Sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4: Registered Storage Tanks, Federal RCRA Generators, Federal and State EC/IC, ERNS. A copy of the full regulatory database report, including available details of all listed sites, is included in Appendix E.

Federal NPL # of sites: 0 Search Distance: 1-mile
Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

Federal Delisted NPL # of sites: 0 Search Distance: 1-mile Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -20- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

Federal SEMS # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile
Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

Federal SEMS-ARCHIVE # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

Federal CORRACTS # of sites: 0 Search Distance: 1-mile
Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

Federal RCRA-TSD # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile
Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

State HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE # of sites: 2 Search Distance: 1-mile Notable Listing: Mountain View Continuation / Ramona Boulevard Distance in feet: 3,176 Direction: ENE Gradient: Up
Data Discussion: The first closest listing is mentioned in Section 4.3.3. The second closest ENVIROSTOR listing indicated that the site is on a “School Investigation” database type, indicating no contaminants have been found. The site had received a “No Further Action” letter as of 08/03/2007.

REC Discussion: Based on the details provided above, a REC is not suspected in connection with the Property.

VEC Discussion: Based on the available data, a VEC is not suspected.

State SOLID WASTE FACILITY/LANDFILL # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -21- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
State LEAKING STORAGE TANKS # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

State VOLUNTARY CLEANUP SITES # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

State BROWNFIELD SITES # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None
Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient:

Data Discussion:

REC Discussion:

VEC Discussion:

UNMAPPED/ORPHAN LIST SITES
Hillmann has also reviewed a list of unmapped sites (a.k.a. “Orphan List” sites) indicated by the database report. Unmapped sites that were identified as falling within an applicable specific search distance or warranting discussion have either been discussed in the preceding tables or are detailed below:

Notable Listings: None

4.4 Additional Environmental Record Sources
Requests have been submitted to local, municipal and state agencies for pertinent records pertaining to the Property, particularly with regard to potential environmental concerns such as petroleum storage tanks, storage and usage of hazardous substances and petroleum products, and/or known or suspected environmental contamination. Where applicable, internet research of government environmental regulatory databases was also conducted, as well as a general cursory internet search of the Property address, for information indicative of a REC. The following table summarizes the findings of the research:

Source Type of
Request Outcome
EPA MyProperty Online
search
Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found.

CA DTSC
(Envirostor)
Online
search
Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found.

CA DTSC
(Envirostor)
FOI
request
Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found.

CA SWRCB
(GeoTracker)
Online
search
Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -22- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California
Source Type of
Request Outcome
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board (RWQCB)
FOI
request
A response was recieved stating that no records were found.

South Coast Air
Quality Management
District (SCAQMD)
FOI
request
A response was recieved stating that no records were found.

Riverside County
Agricultural
Commission
FOI
request
No response was received prior to report issuance.

Riverside HazMat
(CUPA)
FOI
request
No response was received prior to report issuance.

Internet Search
Engine
Online
search
Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -23- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
The site reconnaissance consisted of visual and/or physical observations of the Property and improvements, adjoining properties as viewed from the Property boundaries and the surrounding area based on visual observations from adjoining public thoroughfares. Building exteriors were observed at ground level, unless otherwise indicated. Where applicable, representative areas of building interiors were accessed and observed to the extent they were made safely accessible with the cooperation of the site escort.

Site Inspection Personnel: Ms. Gabriela Cyrulik
Property Escort/Company: Unescorted
Inspection Date: November 19, 2021
Weather Conditions: Sunny, 85 degrees F

5.1.1 Significant Inaccessible Areas
No significant areas of the Property inaccessible at the time of the inspection were noted.

5.1.2 Significant Limiting Site Conditions
No significant limiting site conditions were noted at the time of the site reconnaissance.

5.2 General Site Setting

5.2.1 Site and Vicinity Characteristics
Abutting Roadways: North Lyon Avenue to the west
Current Property Use: Vacant land
Evidence of Past Property Uses: None observed
Evidence of Past Adjoining
Property Uses:

None observed
Surrounding Area Uses: Residential

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -24- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

5.2.2 Current Adjoining Property Uses
Dir Street Address Description
N 425 North Lyon Ave. Undeveloped land
E NA Undeveloped land with a shed
S NA Residential
W N Lyon Avenue Residential
No visual observations indicative of a potential environmental concern were noted on the adjoining properties.

5.2.3 Topographic Characteristics
Terrain: Flat to gently sloping
Direction of Downward Slope: Towards the north
On-site Water Bodies: None observed
Other Significant Features: None observed

5.2.4 General Description of Structures
Buildings/# of Floors N/A
Approx. Building Area: N/A
Approx. Year Built: 1968
Ancillary Structures: None observed
Sources of Heating & Cooling: No heating or cooling systems were present at the Property.

Potable Water/Sewage Disposal: Municipal utility connections

5.3 Interior & Exterior Observations

5.3.1 Storage/Usage of Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products The following hazardous substances and petroleum products were observed to be stored and used by property occupants:

Occupant Substance Qty/Container Type Storage Conditions NA No significant storage
or use noted

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -25- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

5.3.2 Drums
No hazardous substance or petroleum product drums were noted on the Property.

5.3.3 Unidentified Substance Containers
No unidentified substance containers suspected of containing hazardous substance or petroleum product were noted on the Property.

5.3.4 Other Hazardous Substances/Petroleum Products
No other containers of hazardous substances or petroleum products were noted on the Property.

5.3.5 Bulk Petroleum/Hazardous Material Storage Tanks
The following storage tanks for bulk petroleum or hazardous material storage were identified or reported to be present; or are suspected to be present based on visual observations:

AST/
UST
Product Capacity Construction Year
Installed
Status Location/Notes
(none)
While no visual evidence of a UST was noted, considering the history of development at the Property, the potential presence of abandoned USTs and/or associated buried piping at the Property cannot be ruled out.

5.3.6 PCBs in Oil Filled Electrical/Hydraulic Equipment No oil-filled electrical or hydraulic equipment was identified at the Property.

5.3.7 Odors
No strong, pungent or noxious odors were noted at the Property.

5.3.8 Pools of Liquid
No standing water or pools of liquid likely to contain hazardous substances or petroleum products were noted at the Property.

5.3.9 Interior Stains or Corrosion
No interior areas were identified at the Property.

5.3.10 Interior Drains/Sumps
No interior areas were identified at the Property.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -26- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

5.3.11 Exterior Pits/Ponds/Lagoons
No exterior pits, ponds or lagoons was identified on the Property in connection with waste treatment or disposal.

5.3.12 Stained Soil, Pavement/Stressed Vegetation
No stained soil, pavement or stressed vegetation was observed at the Property.

5.3.13 On-Site Solid Waste Disposal/Fill Material
The following evidence of on-site solid waste dumping/disposal was observed:

Hillmann observed minor trash and debris present along the western and eastern boundary of the Property. All trash and debris are a de minimis condition and does not represent a REC with connection to the Property.

5.3.14 Waste Water
No sanitary sewer discharges were identified at the Property.

No additional waste water discharges were identified at the Property.

5.3.15 Septic Systems
No septic systems were identified at the Property.

5.3.16 Wells
No potable, monitoring or other groundwater wells were identified at the Property.

5.3.17 Railroad Spurs
No railroad spurs were identified on the Property.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -27- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

6.0 INTERVIEWS

6.1 Interviews with Past and Present Owners and Occupants Subject Name/Affiliation Summary
Property Owner /
Representative
Not provided A Property representative completed an environmental questionnaire; however, was not interviewed during the site inspection. Pertinent information from the questionnaire, where applicable, have been referenced in various sections of this report.

Property Occupants Not applicable Property was unoccupied.

Past Owners,
Occupants, Operators
Not applicable Past owners/occupants of the Property were not available for interview at the time of the assessment.

Owners/Occupants of
Adjoining or Nearby
Properties
Not applicable The Property was not an abandoned property with evidence of unauthorized uses or uncontrolled access; therefore, interviews with adjoining or nearby property owners or occupants were not conducted.

6.2 Interviews with State and/or Local Government Officials Written and on-line requests for environmental records of the Property from State and Local governmental agencies are detailed in Section 4.4.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -28- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

7.0 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
In accordance with the contract agreement for this assessment, Hillmann has performed cursory reviews of several potential Business Environmental Risks (also known as “Non-Scope Considerations”). The ASTM E1527-13 standard defines the term business environmental risk (BER) as, “a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a parcel of commercial real estate, not necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice.”

7.1 Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM)
The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the accessed portions of buildings at the Property built prior to 1990 for suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM). The information provided in this section, where applicable, is limited to identification of potential suspect materials in the readily accessible and observed areas of the building, and their general condition. This is not intended to be a comprehensive survey for the presence of ACM, and no testing has been conducted.

No buildings were present at the Property.

7.2 Lead-Based Paint
The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the condition of painted surfaces in the accessed areas of residential buildings/units built prior to 1980. This is not intended to constitute a comprehensive survey for LBP or potential lead hazards, and no testing has been conducted.

No residential buildings were present at the Property.

7.3 Radon
Data compiled by the USEPA, as summarized by the regulatory database report, indicated that the Property is located in an area classified as Zone 2 or 'moderate risk' area for radon. Radon testing was not included in the scope of this assessment.

7.4 Mold/Microbial Damage
As per the contracted scope of work, Hillmann conducted a cursory visual screening of the accessed areas of the building for evidence of significant damage to building materials and finishes as result of moisture intrusion and/or mold/microbial growth. Given the absence of building structures at the Property, mold/microbial growth is not considered to be a significant environmental concern.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -29- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

7.5 NWI Mapped Wetlands
As indicated in the Physical Setting Source table of Section 4.1, no NWI mapped wetlands areas were depicted at the Property by the EDR Geocheck-Physical Setting Source Addendum (attached in Appendic E).

The scope of work for this assessment excludes a visual determination of regulated wetlands at the Property. It is emphasized that, regardless of the wetlands data obtained via the EDR Geocheck-Physical Setting Source Addendum, a delineation of regulated wetlands by a qualified professional would be warranted to determine the presence or absence of regulated wetlands at the Property.

7.6 Lead in Drinking Water
The scope of work for this assessment included a review of the potential for elevated levels of lead in drinking water by determining the source of the drinking water supply and a review of available compliance or testing data.

No potable water service was identified at the Property. No water quality testing data for the onsite potable well was provided by the Property contact.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -30- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

8.0 REFERENCES
ASTM E1527-13-Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; ASTM International, 2013
ASTM E12600-15-Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transaction, ASTM International, 2015
EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheckTM, Environmental Data Resources, 2021 EDR City Directory Abstract Report, Environmental Data Resources, 2021 EDR Sanborn Map Report, Environmental Data Resources, 2021 Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources; A. Buonicore, 2011

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -31- Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

9.0 APPENDICES
Appendix A Site Diagram / Vicinity Map
Appendix B Site Photographs
Appendix C Questionnaires / User Provided Information
Appendix D Historical Records Documentation
Appendix E Regulatory Records Documentation
Appendix F Other Documents / Lab Results
Appendix G Project Personnel Qualifications

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No. C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

APPENDIX A

MAPS / DIAGRAMS

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map N
291 North Lyon Avenue
San Jacinto, California
SCALE: (NOT TO SCALE) PROJECT No.: C3-8749
Site

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Figure 2: Site Diagram N
291 North Lyon Avenue
San Jacinto, California
SCALE: (NOT TO SCALE) PROJECT No.: C3-8749
Site

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

APPENDIX B

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Site Photographs - Page 1

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
View of trash and debris present along the western
perimeter of the Property
View of the north adjoining properties
View of an undocumented soil pile along the western
perimeter of the Property
View of an undocumented soil pile along the western
perimeter of the Property
View of the Property facing east View of the Property facing north-northeast

PHASE I ESA - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
291 North Lyon Avenue,
San Jacinto, California
Project No.: C3-8749

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Site Photographs - Page 2

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
View of the Property facing south View of the Property facing north-northeast View of the Property facing northwest View of the Property facing west View of the southeast adjoining properties View of the southern boundary of the Property

PHASE I ESA - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
291 North Lyon Avenue,
San Jacinto, California
Project No.: C3-8749

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Site Photographs - Page 3

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
View of the Property facing southeast View of the north-northwest adjoining properties View of the Property facing west View of the east adjoining properties View of trash and debris present along the eastern
perimeter of the Property
View of trash and debris present along the eastern
perimeter of the Property

PHASE I ESA - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
291 North Lyon Avenue,
San Jacinto, California
Project No.: C3-8749

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

APPENDIX C

QUESTIONNAIRES/USER PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Your Property. Our Priority.

Making a better future for all the communities we touch. www.HillmannConsulting.com
ASTM E 1527-13/AAI - USER QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions: This form should be completed by a representative of the USER of the Phase I ESA report and returned to Hillmann via email or in-person. The report USER is the entity on whose behalf the assessment is being prepared and that will be relying on the report for liability protections.

In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”),188 the USER must conduct the following inquiries required by 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30, and 312.31. These inquiries must also be conducted by EPA Brownfield Assessment and Characterization grantees. The user should provide the following information to the environmental professional. Failure to conduct these inquiries could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiries” is not complete. Please complete the following questionnaire and provide any of the referenced information (if available) to Hillmann.

USER
Company Name:

USER
Mailing Address:

Respondent Name
& Email Address:

Date of
Completion:

Property Address: YES NO DETAIL (optional):

Environmental liens that are filed or recorded against the property:

Did a search of recorded land title records identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law?
Activity and use limitations that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded against the property:

Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP:

Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and
processes used by this type of business?
Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated:

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Ph I ESA-UQ Page 2 of 2 Form Revised 11/06/2020
Property Address: YES NO DETAIL (optional):

Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable
Information:

Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the
environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? ANSWER BELOW
- Do you know the past uses of the property?
- Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or were once present at the property?
- Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property?
- Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have
taken place at the property?
The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation:

Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property?
Litigation/Administrative Proceedings/Government Notices As the User of this ESA, do you have knowledge of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the property; and (3) any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products.

Additional Details, if applicable:

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

APPENDIX D

HISTORICAL RECORDS DOCUMENTATION

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Inquiry Number: November 09, 20216741672.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 2016 1"=500' Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
2002 1"=500' Acquisition Date: January 01, 2002 USGS/DOQQ 1996 1"=500' Acquisition Date: September 30, 1996 USGS/DOQQ 1989 1"=500' Flight Date: August 14, 1989 USDA
1985 1"=500' Flight Date: July 28, 1985 USDA
1978 1"=500' Flight Date: September 21, 1978 USDA
1975 1"=500' Flight Date: September 18, 1975 USGS
1967 1"=500' Flight Date: May 09, 1967 USDA
1961 1"=500' Flight Date: June 16, 1961 USDA
1953 1"=500' Flight Date: October 20, 1953 USDA
1949 1"=500' Flight Date: June 01, 1949 USDA
1938 1"=500' Flight Date: June 14, 1938 USDA
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 11/09/21 C3-8749 Site Name: Client Name: Hillmann Environmental Co. 291 N LYON AVE 1745 W Orangewood Avenue SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Orange, CA 92868-0000 EDR Inquiry # 6741672.8 Contact: Alyssa Berry Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive.

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 6741672 - 8 page 2

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 2016 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 2012 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 2009 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 2006 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 2002 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1996 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1989 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1985 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1978 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1975 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1967 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1961 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1953 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1949 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 6741672.8 1938 = 500'

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 November 09, 20216741672.3

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:

Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
EDR Inquiry # Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:

Certification #
PO #
Project
11/09/21 291 N LYON AVE C3-8749 Hillmann Environmental Co. 1745 W Orangewood Avenue SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 6741672.3 Orange, CA 92868-0000 Alyssa Berry The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Hillmann Environmental Co. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.

The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. D2D9-4C0B-9FC1 NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY C3-8749 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found.

Certification #: D2D9-4C0B-9FC1
Hillmann Environmental Co. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6741672 3 2

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) C3-8749
291 N LYON AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92582
Inquiry Number: 6741672.5
November 12, 2021
The EDR-City Directory Image Report
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER

CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.

EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals.

RECORD SOURCES
EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report.

EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright.

RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.

Year Target Street Cross Street Source
2017   EDR Digital Archive
2014   EDR Digital Archive
2010   EDR Digital Archive
2005   EDR Digital Archive
2000   EDR Digital Archive
1995   EDR Digital Archive
1992   EDR Digital Archive
1985   Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1980   Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1976   Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1971   Haines Criss-Cross Directory
6741672- 5 Page 1

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

FINDINGS

TARGET PROPERTY STREET
291 N LYON AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92582
Year CD Image Source

N LYON AVE
2017 pg A2 EDR Digital Archive
2014 pg A4 EDR Digital Archive
2010 pg A6 EDR Digital Archive
2005 pg A8 EDR Digital Archive
2000 pg A10 EDR Digital Archive
1995 pg A12 EDR Digital Archive
1992 pg A13 EDR Digital Archive
1985 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1980 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1976 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1971 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 6741672- 5 Page 2

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

FINDINGS

CROSS STREETS
Year CD Image Source

COTTONWOOD AVE
2017 pg. A1 EDR Digital Archive
2014 pg. A3 EDR Digital Archive
2010 pg. A5 EDR Digital Archive
2005 pg. A7 EDR Digital Archive
2000 pg. A9 EDR Digital Archive
1995 pg. A11 EDR Digital Archive
1992 - EDR Digital Archive Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1985 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1980 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1976 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1971 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 6741672- 5 Page 3

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) City Directory Images
4 -

COTTONWOOD AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A1
Target Street Cross Street Source
2017
730 MIRIAM GENTLEY USED FURNITURE
910 SANCHES, JESUS P
914 SLIKER, ANAIS
918 ROBILLARD, LOWELL
952 KINKADE, MARVIN J
958 GOMEZ, LOURDES
1102 GODINA, ROSALBA
1148 MATTINGLY, ESPERANZA
1309 WARD, JEANNETTE
1347 SKIPWORTH, BRADLEY
1379 BARNETT, TERESA L

INTERSTATE DAIRY SYSTEMS
1380 MULVIHILL, WAIT J
1385 WARD, MIKE R
1407 AMERICAN ORNAMENTAL IRON

UPSON, TOM A
1419 MILEY, GARY P
1424 SALAZAR, O
1428 MURR, TREVOR
1431 DUNN, JESSE W
1451 HARVEY, STELLA E
1456 LATHAM, KURT J
1460 MARLOWE, KATELYN
1474 LUCAS, KATHARINE S
1648 LONERGAN, PATRICE J
2050 ODDN, GEORGE

TABOR, JOHN R
2158 HARSH, JAMES R
2733 ATTEMA, S
3079 GALVAN, MATILDE M
3180 VAN DAM DICK DAIRY
3190 VANDAM, STEVE N
3440 PLUMBING RITZ

REFLECTION LAKE RV PARK

4.1 -

N LYON AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A2
Target Street Cross Street Source
2017
179 WILLIAMS, ROBERT O
228 COLIO, MARIA G
368 RODRIGUEZ, ROBERT
532 CAMPBELL, GORDON R
689 HULSTROM, CRAIG E
711 HULSTROM, ELIN L
856 DELGADO, BERT
876 RUIZ, MARTINA T
886 DURAN, DIANA
890 DE ANZA RANCH LP

RECORD, RANDY A
996 C & R AUTO REPAIR
1595 BACKS AUTOMOTIVE

SANDOVAL AUTO SALES
UHAUL

4.1 -

COTTONWOOD AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A3
Target Street Cross Street Source
2014
730 MIRIAM GENTLEY USED FURNITURE
859 PORTILLO, ANGEL R
880 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
910 SANCHES, JESUS P
914 BARRERA, MARIA M

PARTIDA, ESTELLA
918 WARD, AZZIE L
952 KINKADE, MARVIN J
958 GOMEZ, LOURDES
1102 DILKS, RACHEL
1148 MATTINGLY, ESPERANZA
1309 WARD, JEANNETTE
1329 WARD, DAVID W
1347 SKIPWORTH, BRADLEY
1379 WARD, MIKE R
1380 MULVIHILL, WALT
1385 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1407 UPSON, TOM A
1410 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1419 MILEY, GARY P
1424 OROSCO, JESUS M
1428 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1431 DUNN, JESSE W
1451 HARVEY, STELLA E
1456 PADILLA, MIGUEL A
1474 LUCAS, KATHARINE S
1648 LONERGAN, PATRICE
1692 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1743 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1781 HARDY, MARIE
1820 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2050 TABOR, LORI
2158 HARSH, JAMES R
2733 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3079 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3116 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3180 DICK VAN DAM RANCHES

VAN DAM DICK DAIRY
3190 VANDAM, STEVE N
3440 CRAIG, STEVE

PLUMBING RITZ

REFLECTION LAKE RV PARK

4.1 -

N LYON AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A4
Target Street Cross Street Source
2014
179 WILLIAMS, ROBERT O
228 GARCIA, RANEE
291 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
368 RODRIGUEZ, ROBERT
532 CAMPBELL, GORDON R
669 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
711 HULSTRON, ELIN L
856 DELGADO, BERT
876 RUIZ, MARTINA T
880 CAMARENA, MARIO V
886 DURAN, DIANA
890 RECORD, RANDY A
946 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
996 C & R AUTO REPAIR
1521 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1579 FLICKINGER, HEATHER
1595 BACKS AUTOMOTIVE

SANDOVAL AUTO SALES

4.1 -

COTTONWOOD AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A5
Target Street Cross Street Source
2010
720 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
730 HEMET HOSPICE & ESTATE SALES
859 HULL, MARTIN L
880 BELCHER, SHANNON
910 SANCHES, JESUS P
914 BARRERA, MARIA M
918 QUINONEZ, CARLOS R
952 KINKADE, MARVIN J
958 GOMEZ, LOURDES
1102 BURKS, TOMMY B
1140 KING, PATRICK M
1148 KEY, KARYNE
1309 WARD, JEANNETTE
1329 WARD, DAVID W
1347 SKIPWORTH, LINDA M
1379 INTERSTATE DAIRY SYSTEMS

OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1380 MULVIHILL, WAIT J
1385 WARD, MIKE R
1407 UPSON, TOM A
1410 HANSON, WILHELM
1419 MILEY, GARY P
1424 OROSCO, JESUS M
1428 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1431 DUNN, PATRICK L
1451 KOONS, TRAVIS S
1456 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1458 BARACKMAN, DAVID
1460 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1474 LUCAS, KATHARINE S
1648 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1692 CARRILLO, JUVENAL J
1743 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1781 HARDY, MARIE
1820 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2050 ESTRADA, RAFAHEL
2158 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2540 HIXON, ANDY
2733 BARTEL, DALE R
3079 GALVAN, AGUSTIN
3116 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3180 DICK VAN DAM DAIRY

VANDAM, STEVE
3190 VANDAM, DONALD D
3440 MAHURIEN, RONNIE B

REFLECTION LAKE RV PARK

VAIL, AMBER

4.1 -

N LYON AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A6
Target Street Cross Street Source
2010
179 WILLIAMS, CAROL J
228 PEER, SEAN
291 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
368 G & M THOROGHBRED FARM LLC

RUIZ, ARIADNA
532 CAMPBELL, GORDON R
669 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
689 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
711 HULSTRON, ELIN L
771 SILVAS, BUNNY S
856 DELGADO, JESUS J
876 RODRIGUEZ, JULIA S
880 CAMARENA, MARIO V
886 DURAN, DIANA
890 RECORD, RANDOLPH A
946 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
996 LOERA ROBERTO
1521 MITCHELL, DANIEL T
1595 BACKS QUALITY CAR CARE

HOOK UPS AUTO SOUND & ACCES

4.1 -

COTTONWOOD AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A7
Target Street Cross Street Source
2005
730 HEMET HOSPICE & ESTATE SALES
880 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
910 HERNANDEZ, ROSE
913 ROTH, LINDA D
914 BARRERA, MARIA E
918 PEREZ, JOSE A
952 KINKADE, MARVIN J
958 GOMEZ, LOURDES
1007 BURBRIDGE, BYRON D
1102 BURKS, TOMMY B
1140 KING CONSTRUCTION CO

KING, MALCOLM H
1148 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1309 WARD, JOSEPH W
1329 WARD, DAVID W
1347 SKIPWORTH, LINDA M
1379 WARD, MIKE
1380 MULVIHILL, WAIT J
1385 WARD, MICHAEL R
1407 UPSON, TOM A
1410 HANSON, PALMA M
1419 MILEY, GARY P
1424 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1428 HEYE, DANIEL H
1431 DUNN, PATRICK L
1451 HARVEY, HOWARD E
1456 HERNANDEZ, PACIANO
1458 BARACKMAN, DAVID
1474 LUCAS, KATHARINE S
1648 BERNAL, RICARDO A
1692 CARRILLO, JUVENAL J

JQ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
1781 HARDY, MARIE

JRW INVESTORS & ASSOCIATES

SAN JACINTO VILLAGE
1820 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2050 SIMPSON, ROBERT
2540 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2733 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2902 THE RANCH
3079 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3116 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3180 VANDAM, DICK D
3190 VANDAM, DONALD D
3440 REFLECTION LAKE RECREATION TRAILER P

4.1 -

N LYON AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A8
Target Street Cross Street Source
2005
179 WILLIAMS, CAROL J
228 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
271 LANZON, BRADY
291 GUTIERREZ, ROSA
368 ECHEVERRIA, KERMAN
532 HIDEAWAY FARMS

RAMOS, DELIA G
689 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
711 GENE HULSTROM TRUCKING

HULSTROM, GENE T
760 DELRIO, LUIS
890 HALL, CAROLYN

4.1 -

COTTONWOOD AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A9
Target Street Cross Street Source
2000
730 HEMET HOSPICE & ESTATE SALES
880 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
910 SANCHES, JESUS P
913 BAILEY, L
914 GARCIA, CAMILO
918 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
952 KINKADE, M J
1007 BURBRIDGE, BYRON D
1102 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1140 BOOTHBY, WAYNE E

KING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
1148 BAILEY, DONALD A
1329 WARD, SUSIE
1347 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1379 INTERSTATE DAIRY SYSTEMS

WARD, MIKE
1380 MULVIHILL, WALT
1385 WARD, MICHAEL R
1390 DEVITT, KIMBER
1407 UPSON, TOM
1410 HANSON, WILHELM
1419 MILEY, GARY
1424 HEYE, DANIEL H
1431 DUNN, JESSE W
1451 HARVEY, HOWARD E
1456 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1474 LUCAS, K
1648 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1692 CARRILLO, JUVENAL
1742 HOLMES, JOHN F
1781 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1820 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1996 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2050 FERGUSON, TOM

SIMPSON, ROBERT
2540 HIXSON, M E
2733 BARTEL, DALE
3180 DESTIGTER, J A
3440 REFLECTION LAKE RECREATION TRAILER PARK & CAMPGROUND

4.1 -

N LYON AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A10
Target Street Cross Street Source
2000
179 WILLIAMS, CAROL
271 SANCHEZ, MARK H
291 GUTIERREZ, ROSA

HUNDLEY, CECILE
332 LOUREIRO, THEREZA
368 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
532 AGUILAR, ISMAEL

DOUBLE ROCKING R RANCH

ECHEVERRIA, KERMAN

HAWKINS ROBERT E

HIDEAWAY FARMS
669 HULSTROM, HARRY
711 HULSTROM GENE

HULSTROM, GENE
789 MACLIN OPEN AIR MARKETS
880 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
890 RECORD, CLAYTON

4.1 -

COTTONWOOD AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A11
Target Street Cross Street Source
1995
730 CHERRY PICKER USED FURNITURE
952 KINKADE, M J
1102 RHOADS, KENNY
1140 KING CONSTRUCTION CO

KING, MALCOLM H
1148 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
1742 HOLMES, JOHN
1781 CHACON, CHARLES
1996 SNOW, GREG
3440 VORZIMER, MARIA
3490 PRITCHETT, MERRILL

4.1 -

N LYON AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A12
Target Street Cross Street Source
1995
288 ONEAL, JAMES
532 DOUBLE ROCKING R RANCH
645 MEREDITH, MURIEL R
711 HULSTROM, GENE
760 RUIZ, ANA M
789 GRAHAMS SAN JACINTO STOCKYARD

LOZANO, ROGELIO

MACLIN AUCTIONS & OPEN AIR
830 PHILIPPI, PETE
870 NAGY, EMMA
880 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
890 RECORD, CLAYTON JR

4.1 -

N LYON AVE
EDR Digital Archive
6741672.5 Page: A13
Target Street Cross Street Source
1992
789 BOBS AUCTION SALES
BONNYS

LOZANO, SAN M

MACLIN AUCTION&MRKT

SAN JACINTO AUCTION
890 RECORD, CLAYTON JR

4.1 EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 November 09, 20216741672.4

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:

P.O.#
Project:

Maps Provided:

Latitude:

Longitude:

UTM Zone:

UTM X Meters:

UTM Y Meters:

Elevation:

Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:
2012
1996
1979
1967, 1972
1956
1953
1948
1943
1901
11/09/21 C3-8749 Hillmann Environmental Co. 291 N LYON AVE 1745 W Orangewood Avenue SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Orange, CA 92868-0000 6741672.4 Alyssa Berry EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Hillmann Environmental Co. were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s.

NA 33.790508 33° 47' 26" North C3-8749 -116.987446 -116° 59' 15" West Zone 11 North 501162.17 3738928.39 1511.00' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
2012 Source Sheets
2012
Lakeview

7.5-minute, 24000
2012
San Jacinto

7.5-minute, 24000
1996 Source Sheets
1996
San Jacinto

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1994
1979 Source Sheets
1979
San Jacinto

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
1979
Lakeview

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1976
1967, 1972 Source Sheets
1967
Lakeview

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1966
1972
San Jacinto

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1972
6741672 4 3

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1956 Source Sheets
1956
Banning
15-minute, 62500
Aerial Photo Revised 1951
1953 Source Sheets
1953
San Jacinto

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1949
1953
Lakeview

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1951
1948 Source Sheets
1948

BANNING
15-minute, 50000
1943 Source Sheets
1943
PERRIS
15-minute, 62500
1943
Banning
15-minute, 62500
Aerial Photo Revised 1941
6741672 4 4

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1901 Source Sheets
1901
Elsinore
30-minute, 125000
1901
San Jacinto
30-minute, 125000
6741672 4 5

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, San Jacinto, 2012, 7.5-minute
W, Lakeview, 2012, 7.5-minute
67416724 6

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1996 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, San Jacinto, 1996, 7.5-minute
67416724 7

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1979 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, San Jacinto, 1979, 7.5-minute
W, Lakeview, 1979, 7.5-minute
67416724 8

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1967, 1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, San Jacinto, 1972, 7.5-minute
W, Lakeview, 1967, 7.5-minute
67416724 9

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1956 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, Banning, 1956, 15-minute
67416724 10

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1953 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, San Jacinto, 1953, 7.5-minute
W, Lakeview, 1953, 7.5-minute
67416724 11

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1948 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, BANNING, 1948, 15-minute
67416724 12

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1943 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, Banning, 1943, 15-minute
NW, PERRIS, 1943, 15-minute
67416724 13

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W
E

SW S SE NW N NE
1901 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8749 291 N LYON AVE SAN JACINTO, CA 92582 Hillmann Environmental Co.

TP, San Jacinto, 1901, 30-minute
W, Elsinore, 1901, 30-minute
67416724 14

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8749 291 North Lyon Avenue, San Jacinto, California

APPENDIX E

REGULATORY RECORDS DOCUMENTATION

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

FORM-LBC-CCA
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
C3-8749
291 N LYON AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92582
Inquiry Number: 06741672.2r
November 09, 2021

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 9
Orphan Summary 19
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-20
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-22
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC06741672.2r Page 1
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC06741672.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).

The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS
291 N LYON AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92582

COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 33.7905080 - 33˚ 47’ 25.82’’
Longitude (West): 116.9874460 - 116˚ 59’ 14.80’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11
UTM X (Meters): 501162.2
UTM Y (Meters): 3738734.5
Elevation: 1511 ft. above sea level

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 12002892 SAN JACINTO, CA
Version Date: 2018
West Map: 12015891 LAKEVIEW, CA
Version Date: 2018

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140530
Source: USDA

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076)) 06741672.2r Page 2
2 MT. VIEW CONTINUATIO RAMONA BOULEVARD ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 3176, 0.602, ENE 1 LYON AVE. NEW ELEMEN 425 NORTH LYON AVENU ENVIROSTOR, SCH, CERS Lower 645, 0.122, NNW

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
291 N LYON AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92582
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC06741672.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1041 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC06741672.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE State Response Sites
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Active UST Facilities
AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database
SWRCY Recycler Database
HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1042 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC06741672.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database
CDL Clandestine Drug Labs

CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE
Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing
HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database
Local Land Records
LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
DEED Deed Restriction Listing
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information

EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing

4.1.s
Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (JA Bray Community T38202 (P21-076))

San Jacinto City CouncilJanuary 16, 2024

San Jacinto City Council
January 16, 2024