Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, April 2, 2024 (part 6 of 6)

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 2
RK conducted a 24-hour radar speed survey along Mountain Avenue, between Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot on September 26, 2023, and the 85th percentile speed was calculated to be 51 miles per hour based on the 100 surveys collected during the survey.

The intersections of Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot provide local access to the residential communities along the east side of Mountain Avenue.
• Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc is a three-legged intersection with stop control on the minor leg approach of Rue Pinot Blanc. Rue Pinot Blanc has approximately 40 feet curb to curb width. No sidewalk crosswalks are present at the intersection. • Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot is a three-legged intersection with stop control on the minor leg approach of Rue Merlot. Rue Merlot has approximately 40 feet curb to curb width. No sidewalk crosswalks are present at the intersection.

Existing traffic volumes for the study intersections were compiled for RK in September 2023. The vehicle traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle count worksheets are included in Appendix A. Radar speed surveys are included in Appendix B.

A summary of the hourly traffic counts for Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc are shown in Table 1 and the hourly traffic counts for Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot are shown in Table 2.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 3 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 3
Table 1
Existing Hourly Intersection Approach Traffic Volume
Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc
Wednesday, September 27, 2023
Start
Time
Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc
Grand
NB SB Total Subtotal
NB + SB EB WB SubtotalEB + WB
12:00 AM 46 105 151 -- 1 1 152
1:00 AM 60 81 141 -- 0 0 141
2:00 AM 92 51 143 -- 2 2 145
3:00 AM 217 64 281 -- 3 3 284
4:00 AM 423 90 513 -- 5 5 518
5:00 AM 581 178 759 -- 6 6 765
6:00 AM 745 282 1,027 -- 19 19 1,046
7:00 AM 974 459 1,433 -- 32 32 1,465
8:00 AM 697 484 1,181 -- 14 14 1,195
9:00 AM 485 380 865 -- 17 17 882
10:00 AM 424 412 836 -- 19 19 855
11:00 AM 484 498 982 -- 7 7 989
12:00 PM 488 556 1,044 -- 15 15 1,059
1:00 PM 565 578 1,143 -- 14 14 1,157
2:00 PM 533 639 1,172 -- 15 15 1,187
3:00 PM 573 821 1,394 -- 17 17 1,411
4:00 PM 532 917 1,449 -- 12 12 1,461
5:00 PM 572 920 1,492 -- 16 16 1,508
6:00 PM 449 804 1,253 -- 7 7 1,260
7:00 PM 317 629 946 -- 4 4 950
8:00 PM 273 498 771 -- 4 4 775
9:00 PM 187 348 535 -- 2 2 537
10:00 PM 131 261 392 -- 1 1 393
11:00 PM 76 199 275 -- 2 2 277
TOTAL 9,924 10,254 20,178 0 234 234 20,412
= 8 highest traffic hours of the day

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 4 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 4
Table 2
Existing Hourly Intersection Approach Traffic Volume
Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot
Wednesday, September 27, 2023
Start
Time
Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot
Grand
NB SB Total Subtotal
NB + SB EB WB SubtotalEB + WB
12:00 AM 45 103 148 -- 1 1 149
1:00 AM 59 80 139 -- 1 1 140
2:00 AM 90 51 141 -- 2 2 143
3:00 AM 217 63 280 -- 2 2 282
4:00 AM 429 90 519 -- 8 8 527
5:00 AM 566 178 744 -- 22 22 766
6:00 AM 736 282 1,018 -- 22 22 1,040
7:00 AM 948 447 1,395 -- 41 41 1,436
8:00 AM 683 479 1,162 -- 30 30 1,192
9:00 AM 478 375 853 -- 13 13 866
10:00 AM 424 405 829 -- 17 17 846
11:00 AM 475 492 967 -- 22 22 989
12:00 PM 479 551 1,030 -- 21 21 1,051
1:00 PM 544 568 1,112 -- 27 27 1,139
2:00 PM 528 622 1,150 -- 23 23 1,173
3:00 PM 566 811 1,377 -- 30 30 1,407
4:00 PM 520 903 1,423 -- 22 22 1,445
5:00 PM 547 908 1,455 -- 24 24 1,479
6:00 PM 445 798 1,243 -- 18 18 1,261
7:00 PM 314 616 930 -- 11 11 941
8:00 PM 269 488 757 -- 7 7 764
9:00 PM 187 345 532 -- 6 6 538
10:00 PM 130 256 386 -- 1 1 387
11:00 PM 75 196 271 -- 4 4 275
TOTAL 9,754 10,107 19,861 0 375 375 20,236
= 8 highest traffic hours of the day

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 5 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 5
RK has obtained collision data from SWITRS for the years 2020 to 2023. According to the collision data and as summarized in Table 2, a maximum of two (2) collisions have occurred during a 12-month period within 250 feet of the intersection in the past four (4) years.

Table 3
Intersection Collision History
2020 - 2023
Intersection
Year
Total
2020 2021 2022 2023
Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc 0 1 1 0 2
Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot 0 0 0 0 0
A copy of the collision data is included in Appendix C. A full copy of the collision data is included in RK’s files.

Sight Distance Review
The existing sight distance of each study intersection was analyzed as part of this review.

RK completed a field review of the intersection on Tuesday, October 10, 2023. Field review photographs for the intersection are provided in Appendix D.

Per the City of San Jacinto Adopted General Plan Policy Document, dated November 15, 2022, Mountain Avenue is classified as a Collector roadway. Based on the County of Riverside Standard Plan No. 114, the preferred design speed of a flat Collector roadway is 35 miles per hour. However, based on the existing posted speed limit and the observed 85th percentile speeds on Mountain Avenue, the corner sight distance requirements are assessed based on speeds of 55 mile per hour. As outlined in the County of Riverside Standard Plan No. 821, the standard intersection corner sight distance required for 55 miles per hour is 605 feet.

The County of Riverside Standard Plans for Intersection Sight Distance (i.e. Standard Plan No. 821) and the County of Riverside Standard Plans for Roadway Design Requirements (i.e. Standard Plan No. 114) are both provided in Appendix E.

Based upon our review, limited corner sight distance is available at both the intersections of Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 6 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 6
Obstructions to corner sight distance include block walls, vegetation, and utility boxes at both intersections, as well as a vertical curve looking south on Mountain Avenue from Rue Merlot.

Exhibits B-1 and B-2 illustrate the required intersection sight distance for the study intersection. A sight line is developed and a “limited use area” is created which designates an area between the edge of pavement and the driver’s line of sight. This area prohibits obstructions in order to maintain adequate sight distance at the intersection. The Riverside County standard states that the “limited use area (shall be) kept clear of all obstructions over 2.5 feet high, including vegetation. No trees, walls, or any obstructions shall be allowed in the limited use area.”
Appendix D includes pictures of the limited corner sight distance at each intersection.

All- Way Stop Warrant
All-way stop warrants have been performed using the criteria from the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) standards. A copy of the CA MUTCD allway stop warrant conditions is included in Appendix F. The all-way stop warrants worksheet is provided in Appendix G for existing conditions.

The following criteria are applicable for this analysis:
• Traffic signal warranted
• Collisions
• Minimum volumes
• 80% of collision criteria and minimum volume
• The need to control left-turn conflicts
• The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts
• Sight distance constraints
• An intersection of two (2) residential neighborhood collector streets The specific CA MUTCD All-Way Stop Warrants have been tabulated and listed below:

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 7 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 7
Table 4
CA MUTCD All-Way Stop Warrants
Warrant Description
Results
Mountain Ave. at
Rue Pinot Blanc
Mountain Ave. at
Rue Merlot
A Traffic Signal Warranted Does Not Satisfy Does Not Satisfy B Collisions Does Not Satisfy Does Not Satisfy
C Minimum Volumes Does Not Satisfy Does Not Satisfy
D Combination Minimum Values Does Not Satisfy Does Not Satisfy E Left-Turn Conflicts Does Not Satisfy Does Not Satisfy F Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts Does Not Satisfy Does Not Satisfy G Sight Distance Constraints Satisfied Satisfied
H Intersection of Residential Collector Streets Does Not Satisfy Does Not Satisfy Warrant A
Warrant A states that an all-way stop could be implemented as an interim measure when traffic signals are warranted. A copy of the Caltrans traffic signal warrant criteria is provided in Appendix H. The Caltrans traffic signal warrants worksheets are included in Appendix I.

The following criteria are applicable for this analysis:
• Eight Hour Vehicular Volume
• Four Hour Vehicular Volume
• Peak Hour
• Pedestrian Volume

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 8 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 8
• School Crossing
• Coordinated Signal System
• Crash Warrant
• Roadway Network
As shown in Appendix I, the study intersections do not meet any of the traffic signal warrants per the Caltrans traffic signal warrants criteria.

As a result, the intersections of Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot do not satisfy Warrant A.

Warrant B
To satisfy this warrant, there must be five (5) or more collisions within a 12-month period that are correctable by an all-way stop.

As previously discussed, RK has obtained collision data from SWITRS for years 2020 to 2023. According to the collision data, a maximum of two (2) reported collisions have occurred within 250 feet of Rue Pinot Blanc within a 12-month period over the past 3 years, and zero collisions occurred at Rue Merlot. Therefore, Warrant B has not been met for existing conditions. A copy of the collision data is included in Appendix C. A full copy of the collision data is included in RK’s files.

Warrant C
Warrant C states that an all-way stop could be implemented at an intersection if both of the following conditions are met:
• Condition 1: The average volume on the major street (for both approaches) for any 8-hours must be a minimum of 300 vehicles per hour; AND • Condition 2: The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minorstreet vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 9 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 9
• Condition 3: If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 65 km/h or exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70% of the above values.

The intersections of Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot meet Condition 1 for the major street, but do not meet Condition 2 for the minor street. As seen in Appendix B, the critical speed is 51 miles per hour. As such, Condition 3 is applicable. However, even under the 70% criteria, neither intersection meets the necessary volume requirement for the minor street.

As a result, the intersections of Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot do not satisfy Warrant C.

Warrant D
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80% of the minimum values, then Warrant D would be satisfied. For the existing condition, the study intersections meet the 80% threshold for Criteria C.1, but do not meet the 80% threshold for Criteria B or C.2. Therefore, the study intersections do not satisfy Warrant D.

Warrant E
An intersection would satisfy Warrant E if there were a need to control left-turn conflicts.

The study intersections do not have a need to control left-turn conflicts and as such, the study intersections do not satisfy Warrant E.

Warrant F
Warrant F would be satisfied if there is a need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volume. The study intersections experience low pedestrian volume and would therefore not satisfy Warrant F.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 10 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 10
Warrant G
Warrant G would be satisfied if the road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop reasonably or safely at a location.

As shown in the field review photographs, both study intersections have obstructed corner sight distance due to the presence of existing block walls and trees along Mountain Avenue. Hence, the limited sight distance is a contributing factor for warranting an all-way stop.

However, given the low collision rate and insufficient traffic volume on the minor streets, it is recommended that several remedial measures to improve sight distance, left-turn access, and lower speeds be implemented first instead of installing an all-way stop. See the Recommendations section of this report for further discussion.

Warrant H
Warrant H would be satisfied if an intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multiway stop control would improve traffic operational characters of the intersection.

Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot are both local roadways and do not satisfy the requirements of Warrant H.

Recommendations
The following recommendations are provided to help improve intersection sight distance and left-turn movements from Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot onto Mountain Avenue.

1. Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc (Intersection Improvements) • Trim and maintain vegetation within the corner sight distance limited use areas on both the northwest and southwest corners.
• Move stop bar and stop legend out to the curb line of Mountain Avenue to improve the corner sight distance angle of view and the location of the driver’s eye on the minor road.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 11 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 11
• Install a double-yellow centerline stripe (Detail 22) on Rue Merlot for a length of 50 feet from the stop bar.
• Install a 200-foot-long left turn median acceleration lane with a 120-foot transition on Mountain Avenue
• Continue to monitor intersection operations and future needs for additional traffic control on an annual basis.
• See Exhibit C-1 for conceptual layout of improvements.

2. Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot (Intersection Improvements) • Trim vegetation to reduce obstructions within the corner sight distance limited use areas on both the northwest and southwest corners. • Move stop bar and stop legend out to the curb line of Mountain Avenue to improve the corner sight distance angle of view and the location of the driver’s eye on the minor road.
• Install a double-yellow centerline stripe (Detail 22) on Rue Merlot for a length of 50 feet from the stop bar.
• Install a 200-foot-long left turn median acceleration lane with a 120-foot transition on Mountain Avenue.
• Continue to monitor intersection operations and future needs for additional traffic control on an annual basis.
• See Exhibit C-2 for conceptual layout of improvements.

3. Mountain Avenue, from Esplanade Avenue to Hemet Street (Roadway Segment Improvement)

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

Page 12 ends

RK19400.doc
JN: 0328-2023-10 12
• Install 6-inch white edge line stripes and painted median along Mountain Avenue. Through travel lanes should be a maximum of 12-feet wide to help narrow the roadway and reduce vehicle speeds.
• Review the posted speed limit recommendation during the next citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey updated to determine if a potential speed limit reduction is appropriate.
• See Exhibit C-1 and C-2 for conceptual layout.

Conclusions
The intersections of Mountain Avenue and Rue Pinot Blanc and Mountain Avenue and Rue Merlot have been evaluated for all-way stop control and traffic signal control using the criteria of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) standards.

Based upon our review, RK does not recommend the installation of all-way stop control or traffic signal control for these intersections.

It is recommended that the improvements listed in the Recommendations section of this report be implemented first as remedial measures to improve sight distance and slow traffic prior to implementing an all-way stop.

If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need further review, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 474-0809.

Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

Robert Kahn, P.E. Bryan Estrada, AICP, PTP
Founding Principal Principal
Attachments
XC: Stuart McKibbin, City of San Jacinto

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Exhibits

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Legend:
1 1 = Study Intersection
2 Mountain Ave.

Rue Pinot Blanc
Rue Merlot
Esplanade Ave.

Hemet St.

N engineering group, inc. Location Map Exhibit A MOUNTAIN AVENUE AT RUE PINOT BLANC AND RUE MERLOT TRAFFIC CALMING REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-10 5.3.c Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Legend:

Rue Pinot Blanc = Driver's Eye at Intersection = Limited Use Area 605' engineering group, inc. Intersection Corner Sight Distance Exhibit B-1 Rue Pinot Blanc MOUNTAIN AVENUE AT RUE PINOT BLANC AND RUE MERLOT TRAFFIC CALMING REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-10 605' Mountain Ave.

Esplanade Ave.

N 5.3.c
Packet Pg. 722
Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Legend:

Rue Merlot engineering group, inc. Intersection Corner Sight Distance Exhibit B-2 Rue Merlot MOUNTAIN AVENUE AT RUE PINOT BLANC AND RUE MERLOT TRAFFIC CALMING REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-10 605' 605' = Driver's Eye at Intersection = Limited Use Area Mountain Ave.

Rue Pinot Blanc
Hemet St.

N 5.3.c
Packet Pg. 723
Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 200' MOUNTAIN AVENUE TRIM VEGETATION AT CORNER
RUE PINOT BLANC TRIM VEGETATION AT CORNER EXTEND STOPBAR TO CURB LINE 120' 50' 60' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' EDGE LINES AND PAINTED MEDIAN TO EXTEND TO ADJACENT INTERSECTION EDGE LINES AND PAINTED MEDIAN TO EXTEND TO ADJACENT INTERSECTION Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc Conceptual Striping Plan Exhibit C-1 MOUNTAIN AVENUE AT RUE PINOT BLANC AND RUE MERLOT TRAFFIC CALMING REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-10 CONCEPTUAL. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. engineering group, inc.

N 5.3.c
Packet Pg. 724
Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 200'

RUE MERLOT
50' 120' 50' TRIM VEGETATION AT CORNER EXTEND STOPBAR TO CURB LINE TRIM VEGETATION AT CORNER MOUNTAIN AVENUE 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' EDGE LINES AND PAINTED MEDIAN TO EXTEND TO ADJACENT INTERSECTION EDGE LINES AND PAINTED MEDIAN TO EXTEND TO ADJACENT INTERSECTION Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot Conceptual Striping Plan Exhibit C-2 MOUNTAIN AVENUE AT RUE PINOT BLANC AND RUE MERLOT TRAFFIC CALMING REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-10 engineering group, inc.

N CONCEPTUAL. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. 5.3.c
Packet Pg. 725
Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Appendices

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Appendix A
Traffic Count Worksheets

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Page 1 ends

City of San Jacinto
Mountain Avenue
B/ Esplanade Avenue - Rue Pinot Blanc
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
SJC001
Site Code: 105-23872
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 9/27/23 Hour Totals Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 20 145 11 111
12:15 36 160 12 109
12:30 32 134 10 118
12:45 17 117 105 556 13 153 46 491 151 1047
01:00 21 145 12 143
01:15 19 130 17 154
01:30 15 160 19 140
01:45 26 143 81 578 12 140 60 577 141 1155
02:00 17 162 20 129
02:15 15 138 18 157
02:30 10 164 22 136
02:45 9 175 51 639 33 119 93 541 144 1180
03:00 16 203 28 163
03:15 16 189 48 126
03:30 17 204 56 142
03:45 15 225 64 821 88 152 220 583 284 1404
04:00 17 246 90 122
04:15 11 195 108 128
04:30 35 228 110 143
04:45 27 248 90 917 119 142 427 535 517 1452
05:00 28 233 140 143
05:15 34 254 132 140
05:30 63 239 142 147
05:45 53 194 178 920 173 151 587 581 765 1501
06:00 56 223 190 105
06:15 76 201 176 114
06:30 68 191 166 121
06:45 82 189 282 804 227 110 759 450 1041 1254
07:00 117 178 220 102
07:15 117 139 256 91
07:30 106 154 242 63
07:45 119 158 459 629 284 62 1002 318 1461 947
08:00 118 144 233 69
08:15 134 139 191 94
08:30 133 108 148 66
08:45 99 107 484 498 135 46 707 275 1191 773
09:00 109 105 108 47
09:15 80 95 131 54
09:30 107 72 136 44
09:45 84 76 380 348 116 40 491 185 871 533
10:00 101 76 116 46
10:15 102 72 105 36
10:30 100 56 118 31
10:45 109 57 412 261 99 18 438 131 850 392
11:00 103 54 122 27
11:15 143 59 108 15
11:30 124 59 116 16
11:45 128 27 498 199 141 18 487 76 985 275
Total 3084 7170 3084 7170 5317 4743 5317 4743 8401 11913 Combined
Total 10254 10254 10060 10060 20314
AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 504 - - - 1015 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.940 0.893
PM Peak - - 04:45 - - - 00:45 - - - -
Vol. - - 974 - - - 590 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.959 0.958
Percentag
e

30.1% 69.9% 52.9% 47.1%
ADT/AADT ADT 20,314 AADT 20,314
Southbound Northbound

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Page 1 ends

City of San Jacinto
Mountain Avenue
B/ Rue Pinot Blanc - Rue Merlot
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
SJC002
Site Code: 105-23872
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 9/27/23 Hour Totals Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 20 145 11 111
12:15 34 159 12 110
12:30 32 130 10 114
12:45 17 117 103 551 13 153 46 488 149 1039
01:00 21 144 12 142
01:15 19 129 17 151
01:30 15 154 19 134
01:45 25 141 80 568 12 138 60 565 140 1133
02:00 17 154 20 127
02:15 15 138 17 156
02:30 10 156 22 133
02:45 9 174 51 622 33 117 92 533 143 1155
03:00 16 203 26 159
03:15 15 186 48 124
03:30 17 202 56 141
03:45 15 220 63 811 87 149 217 573 280 1384
04:00 18 241 90 120
04:15 11 193 104 125
04:30 35 223 110 141
04:45 26 246 90 903 119 146 423 532 513 1435
05:00 28 230 140 141
05:15 34 250 129 140
05:30 63 236 139 141
05:45 53 192 178 908 173 150 581 572 759 1480
06:00 56 220 188 107
06:15 76 200 172 114
06:30 66 191 164 119
06:45 84 187 282 798 221 109 745 449 1027 1247
07:00 115 175 207 101
07:15 114 135 249 91
07:30 103 149 239 64
07:45 115 157 447 616 279 61 974 317 1421 933
08:00 115 142 229 69
08:15 133 138 189 94
08:30 132 104 145 63
08:45 99 104 479 488 134 47 697 273 1176 761
09:00 108 104 107 48
09:15 77 95 127 55
09:30 104 70 137 44
09:45 86 76 375 345 114 40 485 187 860 532
10:00 100 75 113 46
10:15 100 70 100 36
10:30 95 53 114 31
10:45 110 58 405 256 97 18 424 131 829 387
11:00 99 52 120 27
11:15 143 59 107 15
11:30 123 59 115 16
11:45 127 26 492 196 142 18 484 76 976 272
Total 3045 7062 3045 7062 5228 4696 5228 4696 8273 11758 Combined
Total 10107 10107 9924 9924 20031
AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 495 - - - 996 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.930 0.892
PM Peak - - 04:45 - - - 00:45 - - - -
Vol. - - 962 - - - 580 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.962 0.948
Percentag
e

30.1% 69.9% 52.7% 47.3%
ADT/AADT ADT 20,031 AADT 20,031
Southbound Northbound

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Page 1 ends

City of San Jacinto
Mountain Avenue
B/ Rue Merlot - Hemet Street
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
SJC003
Site Code: 105-23872
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 9/27/23 Hour Totals Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 22 139 12 105
12:15 33 153 10 108
12:30 31 127 10 114
12:45 17 115 103 534 13 152 45 479 148 1013
01:00 20 143 12 132
01:15 19 122 17 145
01:30 16 150 18 134
01:45 23 136 78 551 12 133 59 544 137 1095
02:00 16 146 18 132
02:15 16 124 17 153
02:30 8 146 22 125
02:45 10 173 50 589 33 118 90 528 140 1117
03:00 17 195 26 158
03:15 14 188 48 126
03:30 17 203 60 139
03:45 16 209 64 795 83 143 217 566 281 1361
04:00 18 229 91 113
04:15 10 182 102 123
04:30 35 211 117 133
04:45 26 238 89 860 119 151 429 520 518 1380
05:00 30 219 135 137
05:15 35 248 124 134
05:30 57 224 137 133
05:45 55 191 177 882 170 143 566 547 743 1429
06:00 48 210 187 105
06:15 77 192 171 114
06:30 69 191 160 114
06:45 84 182 278 775 218 112 736 445 1014 1220
07:00 110 166 212 97
07:15 111 127 231 92
07:30 98 139 229 66
07:45 113 154 432 586 276 59 948 314 1380 900
08:00 111 146 216 70
08:15 129 130 188 94
08:30 130 92 143 60
08:45 101 100 471 468 136 45 683 269 1154 737
09:00 102 108 110 46
09:15 81 89 127 56
09:30 96 68 131 45
09:45 89 76 368 341 110 40 478 187 846 528
10:00 98 73 116 44
10:15 97 64 95 35
10:30 96 55 118 32
10:45 106 57 397 249 95 19 424 130 821 379
11:00 100 49 120 25
11:15 138 55 110 17
11:30 121 59 110 16
11:45 125 24 484 187 135 17 475 75 959 262
Total 2991 6817 2991 6817 5150 4604 5150 4604 8141 11421 Combined
Total 9808 9808 9754 9754 19562
AM Peak - 11:00 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 484 - - - 952 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.877 0.862
PM Peak - - 04:45 - - - 03:00 - - - -
Vol. - - 929 - - - 566 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.936 0.896
Percentag
e

30.5% 69.5% 52.8% 47.2%
ADT/AADT ADT 19,562 AADT 19,562
Southbound Northbound

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Page 1 ends

City of San Jacinto
Rue Pinot Blanc
B/ Mountain Avenue - Alsace Court
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
SJC004
Site Code: 105-23872
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 9/27/23 Hour Totals Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 4 0 4
12:15 3 4 1 2
12:30 0 5 0 5
12:45 0 4 3 17 0 4 1 15 4 32
01:00 0 1 0 1
01:15 0 1 0 3
01:30 0 7 0 7
01:45 1 3 1 12 0 3 0 14 1 26
02:00 0 9 0 3
02:15 1 4 2 5
02:30 0 8 0 3
02:45 0 3 1 24 0 4 2 15 3 39
03:00 0 0 2 4
03:15 1 5 0 4
03:30 0 4 0 3
03:45 0 8 1 17 1 6 3 17 4 34
04:00 0 5 1 2
04:15 0 4 4 5
04:30 0 7 0 4
04:45 1 7 1 23 0 1 5 12 6 35
05:00 0 6 0 5
05:15 0 6 3 2
05:30 0 4 3 7
05:45 0 3 0 19 0 2 6 16 6 35
06:00 0 5 2 0
06:15 0 4 4 3
06:30 3 1 3 3
06:45 2 2 5 12 10 1 19 7 24 19
07:00 3 5 14 3
07:15 4 4 8 0
07:30 4 6 4 0
07:45 5 1 16 16 6 1 32 4 48 20
08:00 3 2 4 0
08:15 2 2 3 1
08:30 2 4 4 3
08:45 2 4 9 12 3 0 14 4 23 16
09:00 3 3 3 1
09:15 4 2 5 1
09:30 6 2 2 0
09:45 3 0 16 7 7 0 17 2 33 9
10:00 1 1 3 0
10:15 3 2 6 0
10:30 8 3 7 0
10:45 0 0 12 6 3 1 19 1 31 7
11:00 4 3 2 1
11:15 1 0 2 0
11:30 2 1 2 1
11:45 3 1 10 5 1 0 7 2 17 7
Total 75 170 75 170 125 109 125 109 200 279
Combined
Total 245 245 234 234 479
AM Peak - 07:00 - - - 06:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 16 - - - 36 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.800 0.643
PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 01:30 - - - -
Vol. - - 26 - - - 18 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.722 0.643
Percentag
e

30.6% 69.4% 53.4% 46.6%
ADT/AADT ADT 479 AADT 479
Eastbound Westbound

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Page 1 ends

City of San Jacinto
Rue Merlot
B/ Mountain Avenue - Gaillac Lane
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
SJC005
Site Code: 105-23872
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 9/27/23 Hour Totals Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 7 1 5
12:15 1 7 0 9
12:30 1 7 0 3
12:45 1 2 5 23 0 4 1 21 6 44
01:00 0 6 0 8
01:15 0 3 0 8
01:30 0 9 1 6
01:45 1 4 1 22 0 5 1 27 2 49
02:00 0 13 2 11
02:15 0 12 0 5
02:30 0 10 0 3
02:45 1 7 1 42 0 4 2 23 3 65
03:00 0 9 1 5
03:15 0 8 0 9
03:30 1 5 0 6
03:45 0 8 1 30 1 10 2 30 3 60
04:00 0 11 2 9
04:15 0 10 2 7
04:30 1 14 2 5
04:45 1 11 2 46 2 1 8 22 10 68
05:00 1 10 8 4
05:15 0 8 6 9
05:30 3 8 6 4
05:45 1 7 5 33 2 7 22 24 27 57
06:00 4 8 5 5
06:15 1 8 4 4
06:30 1 5 5 5
06:45 2 4 8 25 8 4 22 18 30 43
07:00 2 7 4 3
07:15 5 10 22 3
07:30 5 7 8 2
07:45 6 4 18 28 7 3 41 11 59 39
08:00 5 1 14 1
08:15 7 5 7 2
08:30 3 6 3 1
08:45 5 8 20 20 6 3 30 7 50 27
09:00 2 5 2 3
09:15 2 5 3 0
09:30 4 4 5 2
09:45 3 2 11 16 3 1 13 6 24 22
10:00 3 0 2 1
10:15 5 2 5 0
10:30 5 0 5 0
10:45 6 1 19 3 5 0 17 1 36 4
11:00 1 2 4 1
11:15 5 5 2 0
11:30 6 2 10 2
11:45 4 2 16 11 6 1 22 4 38 15
Total 107 299 107 299 181 194 181 194 288 493
Combined
Total 406 406 375 375 781
AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 23 - - - 51 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.821 0.580
PM Peak - - 04:00 - - - 03:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 46 - - - 34 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.821 0.773
Percentag
e

26.4% 73.6% 48.3% 51.7%
ADT/AADT ADT 781 AADT 781
Eastbound Westbound

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 01_SJC_Mtn_RPB AM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Pinot Blanc
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Pinot Blanc
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 3 114 117 1 13 14 207 0 207 338
07:15 AM 4 113 117 1 7 8 249 0 249 374
07:30 AM 4 102 106 1 3 4 239 0 239 349
07:45 AM 4 115 119 0 6 6 278 1 279 404
Total 15 444 459 3 29 32 973 1 974 1465
08:00 AM 3 115 118 0 4 4 229 0 229 351
08:15 AM 2 132 134 1 2 3 189 0 189 326
08:30 AM 2 131 133 1 3 4 145 0 145 282
08:45 AM 1 98 99 1 2 3 133 1 134 236
Total 8 476 484 3 11 14 696 1 697 1195
Grand Total 23 920 943 6 40 46 1669 2 1671 2660
Apprch % 2.4 97.6 13 87 99.9 0.1
Total % 0.9 34.6 35.5 0.2 1.5 1.7 62.7 0.1 62.8
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Pinot Blanc
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 4 113 117 1 7 8 249 0 249 374
07:30 AM 4 102 106 1 3 4 239 0 239 349
07:45 AM 4 115 119 0 6 6 278 1 279 404
08:00 AM 3 115 118 0 4 4 229 0 229 351
Total Volume 15 445 460 2 20 22 995 1 996 1478
% App. Total 3.3 96.7 9.1 90.9 99.9 0.1
PHF .938 .967 .966 .500 .714 .688 .895 .250 .892 .915
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 01_SJC_Mtn_RPB AM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Pinot Blanc
Weather: Clear
Mountain Avenue
Rue Pinot Blanc
Mountain Avenue
Thru
445
Left
15 Out In Total
1015 460 1475
Right
20 Left
2 Out Total In
16 22 38
Thru
995
Right
1 Out In Total
447 996 1443
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:45 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 4 115 119 1 13 14 249 0 249
+15 mins. 3 115 118 1 7 8 239 0 239
+30 mins. 2 132 134 1 3 4 278 1 279
+45 mins. 2 131 133 0 6 6 229 0 229
Total Volume 11 493 504 3 29 32 995 1 996
% App. Total 2.2 97.8 9.4 90.6 99.9 0.1
PHF .688 .934 .940 .750 .558 .571 .895 .250 .892
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 01_SJC_Mtn_RPB PM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Pinot Blanc
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Pinot Blanc
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 5 241 246 0 2 2 120 0 120 368
04:15 PM 3 192 195 1 4 5 124 1 125 325
04:30 PM 5 223 228 0 4 4 139 2 141 373
04:45 PM 3 245 248 1 0 1 142 4 146 395
Total 16 901 917 2 10 12 525 7 532 1461
05:00 PM 5 228 233 2 3 5 140 1 141 379
05:15 PM 4 250 254 0 2 2 138 2 140 396
05:30 PM 3 236 239 0 7 7 140 1 141 387
05:45 PM 2 192 194 0 2 2 149 1 150 346
Total 14 906 920 2 14 16 567 5 572 1508
Grand Total 30 1807 1837 4 24 28 1092 12 1104 2969
Apprch % 1.6 98.4 14.3 85.7 98.9 1.1
Total % 1 60.9 61.9 0.1 0.8 0.9 36.8 0.4 37.2
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Pinot Blanc
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 3 245 248 1 0 1 142 4 146 395
05:00 PM 5 228 233 2 3 5 140 1 141 379
05:15 PM 4 250 254 0 2 2 138 2 140 396
05:30 PM 3 236 239 0 7 7 140 1 141 387
Total Volume 15 959 974 3 12 15 560 8 568 1557
% App. Total 1.5 98.5 20 80 98.6 1.4
PHF .750 .959 .959 .375 .429 .536 .986 .500 .973 .983
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 01_SJC_Mtn_RPB PM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Pinot Blanc
Weather: Clear
Mountain Avenue
Rue Pinot Blanc
Mountain Avenue
Thru
959
Left
15 Out In Total
572 974 1546
Right
12 Left
3 Out Total In
23 15 38
Thru
560
Right
8 Out In Total
962 568 1530
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 3 245 248 2 3 5 140 1 141
+15 mins. 5 228 233 0 2 2 138 2 140
+30 mins. 4 250 254 0 7 7 140 1 141
+45 mins. 3 236 239 0 2 2 149 1 150
Total Volume 15 959 974 2 14 16 567 5 572
% App. Total 1.5 98.5 12.5 87.5 99.1 0.9
PHF .750 .959 .959 .250 .500 .571 .951 .625 .953
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Location: Date: 9/27/2023
N/S: Day: Wednesday
E/W:

North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg
Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0 0 0 00
North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg
Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
0000 0
0100 1
0000 0
0100 1
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0 2 0 02
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
TOTAL VOLUMES:
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
TOTAL VOLUMES:
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
San Jacinto
Mountain Avenue
Rue Pinot Blanc

PEDESTRIANS
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Location: Date: 9/27/2023
N/S: Day: Wednesday
E/W:

Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
Mountain Avenue Rue Pinot Blanc Mountain Avenue
Eastbound
TOTAL VOLUMES:
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
Southbound Westbound Northbound
Rue Pinot Blanc
Mountain Avenue
San Jacinto

BICYCLES
7:30 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 02_SJC_Mtn_R Mer AM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Merlot
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Merlot
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 110 111 0 4 4 211 1 212 327
07:15 AM 4 108 112 3 19 22 230 1 231 365
07:30 AM 5 98 103 0 8 8 229 0 229 340
07:45 AM 5 113 118 0 7 7 275 1 276 401
Total 15 429 444 3 38 41 945 3 948 1433
08:00 AM 4 111 115 0 14 14 215 1 216 345
08:15 AM 7 126 133 3 4 7 188 0 188 328
08:30 AM 2 129 131 1 2 3 142 1 143 277
08:45 AM 2 99 101 2 4 6 133 3 136 243
Total 15 465 480 6 24 30 678 5 683 1193
Grand Total 30 894 924 9 62 71 1623 8 1631 2626
Apprch % 3.2 96.8 12.7 87.3 99.5 0.5
Total % 1.1 34 35.2 0.3 2.4 2.7 61.8 0.3 62.1
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Merlot
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 4 108 112 3 19 22 230 1 231 365
07:30 AM 5 98 103 0 8 8 229 0 229 340
07:45 AM 5 113 118 0 7 7 275 1 276 401
08:00 AM 4 111 115 0 14 14 215 1 216 345
Total Volume 18 430 448 3 48 51 949 3 952 1451
% App. Total 4 96 5.9 94.1 99.7 0.3
PHF .900 .951 .949 .250 .632 .580 .863 .750 .862 .905
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 02_SJC_Mtn_R Mer AM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Merlot
Weather: Clear
Mountain Avenue
Rue Merlot
Mountain Avenue
Thru
430
Left
18 Out In Total
997 448 1445
Right
48 Left
3 Out Total In
21 51 72
Thru
949
Right
3 Out In Total
433 952 1385
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:45 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 5 113 118 3 19 22 230 1 231
+15 mins. 4 111 115 0 8 8 229 0 229
+30 mins. 7 126 133 0 7 7 275 1 276
+45 mins. 2 129 131 0 14 14 215 1 216
Total Volume 18 479 497 3 48 51 949 3 952
% App. Total 3.6 96.4 5.9 94.1 99.7 0.3
PHF .643 .928 .934 .250 .632 .580 .863 .750 .862
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 02_SJC_Mtn_R Mer PM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Merlot
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Merlot
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 8 228 236 1 8 9 110 3 113 358
04:15 PM 9 182 191 0 7 7 122 1 123 321
04:30 PM 12 211 223 0 5 5 131 2 133 361
04:45 PM 8 238 246 0 1 1 148 3 151 398
Total 37 859 896 1 21 22 511 9 520 1438
05:00 PM 7 219 226 0 4 4 134 3 137 367
05:15 PM 6 246 252 2 7 9 132 2 134 395
05:30 PM 8 223 231 1 3 4 133 0 133 368
05:45 PM 5 190 195 1 6 7 141 2 143 345
Total 26 878 904 4 20 24 540 7 547 1475
Grand Total 63 1737 1800 5 41 46 1051 16 1067 2913
Apprch % 3.5 96.5 10.9 89.1 98.5 1.5
Total % 2.2 59.6 61.8 0.2 1.4 1.6 36.1 0.5 36.6
Mountain Avenue
Southbound
Rue Merlot
Westbound
Mountain Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 8 238 246 0 1 1 148 3 151 398
05:00 PM 7 219 226 0 4 4 134 3 137 367
05:15 PM 6 246 252 2 7 9 132 2 134 395
05:30 PM 8 223 231 1 3 4 133 0 133 368
Total Volume 29 926 955 3 15 18 547 8 555 1528
% App. Total 3 97 16.7 83.3 98.6 1.4
PHF .906 .941 .947 .375 .536 .500 .924 .667 .919 .960
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway File Name : 02_SJC_Mtn_R Mer PM
Site Code : 10523872
Start Date : 9/27/2023
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Mountain Avenue
E/W: Rue Merlot
Weather: Clear
Mountain Avenue
Rue Merlot
Mountain Avenue
Thru
926
Left
29 Out In Total
562 955 1517
Right
15 Left
3 Out Total In
37 18 55
Thru
547
Right
8 Out In Total
929 555 1484
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:45 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 8 238 246 0 4 4 131 2 133
+15 mins. 7 219 226 2 7 9 148 3 151
+30 mins. 6 246 252 1 3 4 134 3 137
+45 mins. 8 223 231 1 6 7 132 2 134
Total Volume 29 926 955 4 20 24 545 10 555
% App. Total 3 97 16.7 83.3 98.2 1.8
PHF .906 .941 .947 .500 .714 .667 .921 .833 .919
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Location: Date: 9/27/2023
N/S: Day: Wednesday
E/W:

North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg
Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot
Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
0100 1
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0 1 0 01
North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg
Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot
Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
0100 1
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0 1 0 01
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
TOTAL VOLUMES:
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
TOTAL VOLUMES:
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
San Jacinto
Mountain Avenue
Rue Merlot

PEDESTRIANS
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Location: Date: 9/27/2023
N/S: Day: Wednesday
E/W:

Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
Mountain Avenue Rue Merlot Mountain Avenue
Eastbound
TOTAL VOLUMES:
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
Southbound Westbound Northbound
Rue Merlot
Mountain Avenue
San Jacinto

BICYCLES
7:30 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Appendix B
Radar Speed Surveys

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Mountain Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Rue Pinot Blanc - Rue Merlot
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:10
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 3:30
59 1 0 59 X 1
58 0 0 58 0 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 55 MPH
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 3 0 54 X X X 3
53 5 0 53 X X X X X 5
52 1 2 52 X X X 3
51 4 1 51 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 14% 49 3 2 49 X X X X X 5 *
48 5 3 48 X X X X X X X X 8 P % In Pace: 74% 70% 64%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5 A
46 3 2 46 X X X X X 5 C % Under Pace: 22% 14% 22%
45 5 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 * Average Speed: 48 MPH 44 MPH 46 MPH 43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 1 6 42 X X X X X X X 7 * Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 1 3 41 X X X X 4
40 1 5 40 X X X X X X 6
39 1 2 39 X X X 3 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 38 2 2 38 X X X X 4
37 1 0 37 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 44 MPH 46 MPH 36 0 1 36 X 1
35 1 2 35 X X X 3 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 50 MPH 51 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of San Jacinto
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/26/23

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October

Appendix C
SWITRS Collision Data

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 01/01/2021 thru 12/31/2021
Report Run On: 10/11/2023
Total Count: 468
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): ALL
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 0.00 Direction Secondary Rd ESPLANADE AVE NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920H Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5805 Collision Date 20211228 Time 1259 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20220225 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithOTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 DRVR 37 F H HNBD STOPPED N A 0100 DODGE 2008 - 3 N - M G DRVR POSSIBL 37 F 1 0 M G 2F DRVR 24 F H HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 TOYOT 2019 - 3 N - M G Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 426. Direction S Secondary Rd HEMET ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920C Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5741 Collision Date 20210731 Time 2013 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20221103 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithOTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 57 M H PROC ST S A 0100 BMW 2005 - 3 F - M G
2 DRVR 29 M W STOPPED S A 0100 MITSU 2003 - 3 N - M G DRVR POSSIBL 30 M 1 0 M G 3 DRVR 49 F W STOPPED S A 0100 NISSA 2016 - 3 N - P G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 65.0 Direction E Secondary Rd OLD MOUNTAIN NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920H Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5407 Collision Date 20210424 Time 0648 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20210510 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithFIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 27 F W HNBD FATG PROC ST W A 0100 FORD 2017 - 3 N - M G Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 166. Direction S Secondary Rd RUE PINOT BLANC NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920H Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5937 Collision Date 20210830 Time 0020 Day MON Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20210930 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithBICYCLE Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 22 M H HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 SCION 2016 - 3 N - L G 2 BICY 31 M B HNBD LFT TURN E L 0400 - - 3 N - - P BICY MINOR 31 M 1 1 - A Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd PALM AVE Distance (ft) 0.00 Direction Secondary Rd 7TH ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920C Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4508 Collision Date 20210421 Time 0930 Day WED Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20210510 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run FELONY Motor Vehicle Involved WithOTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 DRVR 39 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0700 CHEVR 2021 - 3 N - M G DRVR POSSIBL 39 F 1 0 M G 2F DRVR 998 - IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST - - 9900 - - - N - - - Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info

Page 38 ends

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated 01/01/2022 thru 12/31/2022
Report Run On: 10/11/2023
Total Count: 448
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): ALL
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 75.0 Direction S Secondary Rd HEMET ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920H Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3481 Collision Date 20220509 Time 1120 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20220525 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithOTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 19 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 KIA 2007 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 45 M H HNBD SLOWING N E 2236 DODGE 2012 - 3 N - M G Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 77.0 Direction S Secondary Rd HEMET ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4300 Collision Date 20221104 Time 1430 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20221116 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithOTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 33 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 DODGE 2018 - 3 A - L G 2 DRVR 57 M W HNBD STOPPED S D 2200 FORD 2002 - 3 N - M G DRVR POSSIBL 57 M 1 0 M G Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 375. Direction S Secondary Rd OLD MOUNTAIN NCIC 3300 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920H Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4440 Collision Date 20221008 Time 1650 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20221014 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithFIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 40 M W HBD-NUI PROC ST S C 0200 HARLE 2015 - - N - P P DRVR SERIOUS 40 M 1 1 P P Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd MOUNTAIN AVE Distance (ft) 130. Direction S Secondary Rd RUE PINOT BLANC NCIC 3300 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920H Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5934 Collision Date 20220110 Time 0309 Day MON Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20220112 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithFIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 39 M W HNBD FATG RAN OFF RD E A 0100 KIA 2017 - - N - L G Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info
Primary Rd OLD MOUNTAIN RD Distance (ft) 0.00 Direction E Secondary Rd EVANS ST (N) NCIC 3300 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920H Beat 074 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4440 Collision Date 20221120 Time 1705 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20230106 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run FELONY Motor Vehicle Involved WithOTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 17 M H HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 TOYOT 1998 - - N - M G 2 DRVR 56 F H HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 2007 - - N - M G DRVR SERIOUS 56 F 1 0 M G Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info

Page 39 ends

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated

Appendix D
Field Review Photographs
Tuesday, October 10, 2023

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc
Looking South Looking North
Sight distance obstructions.

Trim vegetation.

Sight distance obstructions.

Trim vegetation

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October Mountain Avenue at Rue Merlot
Looking South Looking North
Sight distance
obstructions.

Trim vegetation.

Sight distance
obstructions.

Trim vegetation.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October

Appendix E
County of Riverside
Standard No. 821 – Intersection Sight Distance
Standard No. 114 – Roadway Design Requirements

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 754
Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 755
Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October

Appendix F
CA MUTCD Guidelines on All-Way Stop Warrants

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 129
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Support:
17 Caltrans will grant such permission only when an investigation indicates that the STOP (R1-1) sign will benefit traffic.

Section 2B.06 STOP Sign Applications
Guidance:
01 At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.08 and 2B.09). 02 The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions:

A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or
C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway.

Support:
03 The use of STOP signs at grade crossings is described in Sections 8B.04 and 8B.05.

Section 2B.07 Multi-Way Stop Applications
Support:
01 Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist.

Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal.
02 The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.04 also apply to multi-way stop applications.

Guidance:
03 The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. 04 The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation:

A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

C. Minimum volumes:

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but

3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.

D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Option:
05 Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:

A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 130
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Section 2B.08 YIELD Sign (R1-2)
Standard:
01 The YIELD (R1-2) sign (see Figure 2B-1) shall be a downward-pointing equilateral triangle with a wide red border and the legend YIELD in red on a white background.

Support:
02 The YIELD sign assigns right-of-way to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need to slow down to a speed that is reasonable for the existing conditions or stop when necessary to avoid interfering with conflicting traffic.

Section 2B.09 YIELD Sign Applications
Option:
01 YIELD signs may be installed:

A. On the approaches to a through street or highway where conditions are such that a full stop is not always required.

B. At the second crossroad of a divided highway, where the median width at the intersection is 30 feet or greater.

In this case, a STOP or YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the first roadway of a divided highway, and a YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the second roadway.

C. For a channelized turn lane that is separated from the adjacent travel lanes by an island, even if the adjacent lanes at the intersection are controlled by a highway traffic control signal or by a STOP sign.

D. At an intersection where a special problem exists and where engineering judgment indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by the use of the YIELD sign.

E. Facing the entering roadway for a merge-type movement if engineering judgment indicates that control is needed because acceleration geometry and/or sight distance is not adequate for merging traffic operation.

Standard:
02 A YIELD (R1-2) sign shall be used to assign right-of-way at the entrance to a roundabout. YIELD signs at roundabouts shall be used to control the approach roadways and shall not be used to control the circulatory roadway.
03 Other than for all of the approaches to a roundabout, YIELD signs shall not be placed on all of the approaches to an intersection.

Section 2B.10 STOP Sign or YIELD Sign Placement
Standard:
01 The STOP or YIELD sign shall be installed on the near side of the intersection on the right-hand side of the approach to which it applies. When the STOP or YIELD sign is installed at this required location and the sign visibility is restricted, a Stop Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the STOP sign or a Yield Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the YIELD sign. 02 The STOP or YIELD sign shall be located as close as practical to the intersection it regulates, while optimizing its visibility to the road user it is intended to regulate. 02a YIELD signs shall not be erected upon the approaches to more than one of the intersecting streets. Refer to CVC 21356.
03 STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be mounted on the same post. 04 No items other than inventory stickers, sign installation dates, and bar codes shall be affixed to the fronts of STOP or YIELD signs, and the placement of these items shall be in the border of the sign. 05 No items other than official traffic control signs, inventory stickers, sign installation dates, antivandalism stickers, and bar codes shall be mounted on the backs of STOP or YIELD signs. 06 No items other than retroreflective strips (see Section 2A.21) or official traffic control signs shall be mounted on the fronts or backs of STOP or YIELD signs supports.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Appendix G
CA MUTCD All-Way Stop Warrants Worksheet

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway CA MUTCD 2014

ALL-WAY STOP WARRANTS
2014 Edition
Major Street: CALC BE DATE 10/16/2023
Minor Street: CHK RK DATE 10/16/2023
Scenario:

CRITERIA SATISFIED FOR FOUR-WAY STOP CONTROL: YES
Any one of the following criteria may warrant four-way stop control:

A. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTED SATISFIED = NO
Urgent need for a four-way stop as an interim measure NO B. ACCIDENTS SATISFIED = NO
Number of Correctable Accidents 2 (5 or more in a 12-month period) C. MINIMUM VOLUMES SATISFIED = NO

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 SATISFIED = YES hours of an average day, and Total Volume = 1315

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) SATISFIED = NO averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average Minor Volume = 16 delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but

3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 65 km/h or exceeds 40 mph, the mimimum vehicular volume warrants are SATISFIED = NO 70% of the above values. Critical Speed = 51
Combined average vehicle volume exceeds 210 (300 * 70%) SATISFIED = YES Combined average minor volume exceeds 140 (200 * 70%) SATISFIED = NO Peak Hour Period Hr 1 Hr 2 Hr 3 Hr 4 Hr 5 Hr 6 Hr 7 Hr 8 TOTAL AVG. 17-18 7-8 16-17 15-16 18-19 8-9 14-15 13-14 VOL. VOL.

Major Street Vehicles 1492 1433 1449 1394 1253 1181 1172 1143 10517 1315 Minor Street Vehicles 16 32 12 17 7 14 15 14 127 16
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 16 32 12 17 7 14 15 14 127 16
TOTAL AVERAGE HOURLY VOLUME 1331
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 SATISFIED = NO are all satisfied to 80% of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Number of correctable accidents exceeds 4 (5 * 80%) SATISFIED = NO Combined average vehicle volume exceeds 240 (300 * 80%) SATISFIED = YES Combined average minor volume exceeds 160 (200 * 80%) SATISFIED = NO OPTION:

Other criteria that may be considered include:

E. The need to control left-turn conflicts NO
F. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate NO high pedestrian volumes;
G. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and YES is not able to reasonably safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
H. An intersection of two residential neighborhod collector (through) streets of NO similar design and operating characteristics where multiway stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

MOUNTAIN AVENUE

RUE PINOT BLANC

WEEKDAY
Sect. 2B.07 to 2B.08 November 7, 2014

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway CA MUTCD 2014

ALL-WAY STOP WARRANTS
2014 Edition
Major Street: CALC BE DATE 10/16/2023
Minor Street: CHK RK DATE 10/16/2023
Scenario:

CRITERIA SATISFIED FOR FOUR-WAY STOP CONTROL: YES
Any one of the following criteria may warrant four-way stop control:

A. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTED SATISFIED = NO
Urgent need for a four-way stop as an interim measure NO B. ACCIDENTS SATISFIED = NO
Number of Correctable Accidents 0 (5 or more in a 12-month period) C. MINIMUM VOLUMES SATISFIED = NO

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) SATISFIED = NO averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average Minor Volume = 27 delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but

Major Street Vehicles 1455 1423 1395 1377 1243 1162 1150 1112 10317 1290 Minor Street Vehicles 24 22 41 30 18 30 23 27 215 27
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 24 22 41 30 18 30 23 27 215 27
TOTAL AVERAGE HOURLY VOLUME 1317
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 SATISFIED = NO are all satisfied to 80% of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Other criteria that may be considered include:

MOUNTAIN AVENUE

RUE MERLOT

WEEKDAY
Sect. 2B.07 to 2B.08 November 7, 2014

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Appendix H
CA MUTCD Guidelines on Traffic Signal Warrants

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 830
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
CHAPTER 4C. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL NEEDS STUDIES
Section 4C.01 Studies and Factors for Justifying Traffic Control Signals Standard:
01 An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified at a particular location.
01a On State highways, the engineering study shall include consideration of a roundabout (yield control). If a roundabout is determined to provide a viable and practical solution, it shall be studied in lieu of, or in addition to a traffic control signal.

Guidance:
01b On local streets and highways, the engineering study should include consideration of a roundabout (yield control). If a roundabout is determined to provide a viable and practical solution, it should be studied in lieu of, or in addition to a traffic control signal.

Support:
01c Refer to Caltrans’ website (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/liaisons/ice.html) for more information on the Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-02, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), and other resources for the evaluation of intersection traffic control strategies.
02 The investigation of the need for a traffic control signal shall include an analysis of factors related to the existing operation and safety at the study location and the potential to improve these conditions, and the applicable factors contained in the following traffic signal warrants:

Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
Warrant 5, School Crossing
Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
Warrant 7, Crash Experience
Warrant 8, Roadway Network
Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
03 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

Support:
04 Sections 8C.09 and 8C.10 contain information regarding the use of traffic control signals instead of gates and/ or flashing-light signals at highway-rail grade crossings and highway-light rail transit grade crossings, respectively.

Guidance:
05 A traffic control signal should not be installed unless one or more of the factors described in this Chapter are met.
06 A traffic control signal should not be installed unless an engineering study indicates that installing a traffic control signal will improve the overall safety and/or operation of the intersection. 07 A traffic control signal should not be installed if it will seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow. 08 The study should consider the effects of the right-turn vehicles from the minor-street approaches.

Engineering judgment should be used to determine what, if any, portion of the right-turn traffic is subtracted from the minor-street traffic count when evaluating the count against the signal warrants listed in Paragraph 2. 09 Engineering judgment should also be used in applying various traffic signal warrants to cases where approaches consist of one lane plus one left-turn or right-turn lane. The site-specific traffic characteristics should dictate whether an approach is considered as one lane or two lanes. For example, for an approach with one lane for through and right-turning traffic plus a left-turn lane, if engineering judgment indicates that it should be considered a one-lane approach because the traffic using the left-turn lane is minor, the total traffic volume approaching the intersection should be applied against the signal warrants as a one-lane approach. The

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 831
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
approach should be considered two lanes if approximately half of the traffic on the approach turns left and the left-turn lane is of sufficient length to accommodate all left-turn vehicles. 10 Similar engineering judgment and rationale should be applied to a street approach with one through/left-turn lane plus a right-turn lane. In this case, the degree of conflict of minor-street right-turn traffic with traffic on the major street should be considered. Thus, right-turn traffic should not be included in the minor-street volume if the movement enters the major street with minimal conflict. The approach should be evaluated as a one-lane approach with only the traffic volume in the through/left-turn lane considered. 11 At a location that is under development or construction and where it is not possible to obtain a traffic count that would represent future traffic conditions, hourly volumes should be estimated as part of an engineering study for comparison with traffic signal warrants. Except for locations where the engineering study uses the satisfaction of Warrant 8 to justify a signal, a traffic control signal installed under projected conditions should have an engineering study done within 1 year of putting the signal into stop-and-go operation to determine if the signal is justified. If not justified, the signal should be taken out of stop-and-go operation or removed. 12 For signal warrant analysis, a location with a wide median, even if the median width is greater than 30 feet, should be considered as one intersection.

Option:
13 At an intersection with a high volume of left-turn traffic from the major street, the signal warrant analysis may be performed in a manner that considers the higher of the major-street left-turn volumes as the “minorstreet” volume and the corresponding single direction of opposing traffic on the major street as the “major-street” volume volume of the major-street left-turn volumes plus the higher volume minor-street approach as the “minor street” volume and both approaches of the major street minus the higher of the major-street left-turn volume as “major street” volume.
14 For signal warrants requiring conditions to be present for a certain number of hours in order to be satisfied, any four sequential 15-minute periods may be considered as 1 hour if the separate 1-hour periods used in the warrant analysis do not overlap each other and both the major-street volume and the minor-street volume are for the same specific one-hour periods.
15 For signal warrant analysis, bicyclists may be counted as either vehicles or pedestrians.

Support:
16 When performing a signal warrant analysis, bicyclists riding in the street with other vehicular traffic are usually counted as vehicles and bicyclists who are clearly using pedestrian facilities are usually counted as pedestrians.

Option:
17 Engineering study data may include the following:

A. The number of vehicles entering the intersection in each hour from each approach during 12 hours of an average day. It is desirable that the hours selected contain the greatest percentage of the 24-hour traffic volume.

B. Vehicular volumes for each traffic movement from each approach, classified by vehicle type (heavy trucks, passenger cars and light trucks, public-transit vehicles, and, in some locations, bicycles), during each 15- minute period of the 2 hours in the morning and 2 hours in the afternoon during which total traffic entering the intersection is greatest.

C. Pedestrian volume counts on each crosswalk during the same periods as the vehicular counts in Item B and during hours of highest pedestrian volume. Where young, elderly, and/or persons with physical or visual disabilities need special consideration, the pedestrians and their crossing times may be classified by general observation.

D. Information about nearby facilities and activity centers that serve the young, elderly, and/or persons with disabilities, including requests from persons with disabilities for accessible crossing improvements at the location under study. These persons might not be adequately reflected in the pedestrian volume count if the absence of a signal restrains their mobility.

E. The posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the uncontrolled approaches to the location.

F. A condition diagram showing details of the physical layout, including such features as intersection geometrics, channelization, grades, sight-distance restrictions, transit stops and routes, parking conditions,

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 832
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
pavement markings, roadway lighting, driveways, nearby railroad crossings, distance to nearest traffic control signals, utility poles and fixtures, and adjacent land use.

G. A collision diagram showing crash experience by type, location, direction of movement, severity, weather, time of day, date, and day of week for at least 1 year. 18 The following data, which are desirable for a more precise understanding of the operation of the intersection, may be obtained during the periods described in Item B of Paragraph 17:

A. Vehicle-hours of stopped time delay determined separately for each approach.

B. The number and distribution of acceptable gaps in vehicular traffic on the major street for entrance from the minor street.

C. The posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on controlled approaches at a point near to the intersection but unaffected by the control.

D. Pedestrian delay time for at least two 30-minute peak pedestrian delay periods of an average weekday or like periods of a Saturday or Sunday.

E. Queue length on stop-controlled approaches.

Standard:
19 Delay, congestion, approach conditions, driver confusion, future land use or other evidence of the need for right of way assignment beyond that which could be provided by stop sign shall be demonstrated.

Support:
20 Figure 4C–101(CA) and 4C-103(CA) are examples of warrant sheets.

Guidance:
21 Figure 4C-103(CA) should be used only for new intersections or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

Section 4C.02 Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
Support:
01 The Minimum Vehicular Volume, Condition A, is intended for application at locations where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. 02 The Interruption of Continuous Traffic, Condition B, is intended for application at locations where Condition A is not satisfied and where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or conflict in entering or crossing the major street. 03 It is intended that Warrant 1 be treated as a single warrant. If Condition A is satisfied, then Warrant 1 is satisfied and analyses of Condition B and the combination of Conditions A and B are not needed. Similarly, if Condition B is satisfied, then Warrant 1 is satisfied and an analysis of the combination of Conditions A and B is not needed.

Standard:
04 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; or B. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection.

In applying each condition the major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 8 hours.

Option:
05 If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 70 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 100 percent columns.

Guidance:
06 The combination of Conditions A and B is intended for application at locations where Condition A is not satisfied and Condition B is not satisfied and should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 833
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
Standard:
07 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; and B. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection.

These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours for each condition; however, the 8 hours satisfied in Condition A shall not be required to be the same 8 hours satisfied in Condition B.

On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours.

Option:
08 If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 80 percent columns.

Section 4C.03 Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
Support:
01 The Four-Hour Vehicular Volume signal warrant conditions are intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that, for each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) all fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 for the existing combination of approach lanes. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 4 hours.

Option:
03 If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-2 may be used in place of Figure 4C-1.

Section 4C.04 Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Support:
01 The Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of 1 hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street.

Standard:
02 This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.
03 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following two categories are met:

A. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day:

1. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor-street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; and

2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes; and

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 834
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches.

B. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes.

Option:
04 If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-4 may be used in place of Figure 4C-3 to evaluate the criteria in the second category of the Standard. 05 If this warrant is the only warrant met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal may be operated in the flashing mode during the hours that the volume criteria of this warrant are not met.

Guidance:
06 If this warrant is the only warrant met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal should be traffic-actuated.

Section 4C.05 Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
Support:
01 The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or midblock crossing shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

A. For each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) all fall above the curve in Figure 4C-5; or B. For 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day, the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) falls above the curve in Figure 4C-7.

Option:
03 If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 35 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-6 may be used in place of Figure 4C-5 to evaluate Criterion A in Paragraph 2, and Figure 4C-8 may be used in place of Figure 4C-7 to evaluate Criterion B in Paragraph 2.

Standard:
04 The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal or STOP sign controlling the street that pedestrians desire to cross is less than 300 feet, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. 05 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal shall be equipped with pedestrian signal heads complying with the provisions set forth in Chapter 4E.

Guidance:
06 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, then:

A. If it is installed at an intersection or major driveway location, the traffic control signal should also control the minor-street or driveway traffic, should be traffic-actuated, and should include pedestrian detection.

B. If it is installed at a non-intersection crossing, the traffic control signal should be installed at least 100 feet from side streets or driveways that are controlled by STOP or YIELD signs, and should be pedestrianactuated. If the traffic control signal is installed at a non-intersection crossing, at least one of the signal faces should be over the traveled way for each approach, parking and other sight obstructions should be prohibited for at least 100 feet in advance of and at least 20 feet beyond the crosswalk or site

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 835
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
accommodations should be made through curb extensions or other techniques to provide adequate sight distance, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings.

C. Furthermore, if it is installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated.

Option:
07 The criterion for the pedestrian volume crossing the major street may be reduced as much as 50 percent if the 15th-percentile crossing speed of pedestrians is less than 3.5 feet per second. 08 A traffic control signal may not be needed at the study location if adjacent coordinated traffic control signals consistently provide gaps of adequate length for pedestrians to cross the street.

Section 4C.06 Warrant 5, School Crossing
Support:
01 The School Crossing signal warrant is intended for application where the fact that schoolchildren cross the major street is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. For the purposes of this warrant, the word “schoolchildren” includes elementary through high school students.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of schoolchildren at an established school crossing across the major street shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic stream during the period when the schoolchildren are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period (see Section 7A.03) and there are a minimum of 20 schoolchildren during the highest crossing hour.
03 Before a decision is made to install a traffic control signal, consideration shall be given to the implementation of other remedial measures, such as warning signs and flashers, school speed zones, school crossing guards, or a grade-separated crossing.
04 The School Crossing signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 300 feet, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.

Guidance:
05 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, then:

C. Furthermore, if it is installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated.

Section 4C.07 Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
Support:
01 Progressive movement in a coordinated signal system sometimes necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where they would not otherwise be needed in order to maintain proper platooning of vehicles.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

A. On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning.

B. On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 836
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
Guidance:
03 The Coordinated Signal System signal warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of traffic control signals would be less than 1,000 feet.

Section 4C.08 Warrant 7, Crash Experience
Support:
01 The Crash Experience signal warrant conditions are intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met:

A. Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and
B. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and C. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 (see Section 4C.02), or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours.

Section 4C.09 Warrant 8, Roadway Network
Support:
01 Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the common intersection of two or more major routes meets one or both of the following criteria:

A. The intersection has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has 5-year projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday; or
B. The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour for each of any 5 hours of a non-normal business day (Saturday or Sunday). 03 A major route as used in this signal warrant shall have at least one of the following characteristics:

A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow.

B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city.

C. It appears as a major route on an official plan, such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic and transportation study.

Section 4C.10 Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Support:
01 The Intersection Near a Grade Crossing signal warrant is intended for use at a location where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 837
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Guidance:
02 This signal warrant should be applied only after adequate consideration has been given to other alternatives or after a trial of an alternative has failed to alleviate the safety concerns associated with the grade crossing.

Among the alternatives that should be considered or tried are:

A. Providing additional pavement that would enable vehicles to clear the track or that would provide space for an evasive maneuver, or
B. Reassigning the stop controls at the intersection to make the approach across the track a non-stopping approach.

Standard:
03 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following criteria are met:

A. A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach; and B. During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 for the existing combination of approach lanes over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance as defined in Section 1A.13.

Guidance:
04 The following considerations apply when plotting the traffic volume data on Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10:

A. Figure 4C-9 should be used if there is only one lane approaching the intersection at the track crossing location and Figure 4C-10 should be used if there are two or more lanes approaching the intersection at the track crossing location.

B. After determining the actual distance D, the curve for the distance D that is nearest to the actual distance D should be used. For example, if the actual distance D is 95 feet, the plotted point should be compared to the curve for D = 90 feet.

C. If the rail traffic arrival times are unknown, the highest traffic volume hour of the day should be used.

Option:
05 The minor-street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three adjustment factors as provided in Paragraphs 6 through 8.
06 Because the curves are based on an average of four occurrences of rail traffic per day, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-2 for the appropriate number of occurrences of rail traffic per day.
07 Because the curves are based on typical vehicle occupancy, if at least 2% of the vehicles crossing the track are buses carrying at least 20 people, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-3 for the appropriate percentage of high-occupancy buses. 08 Because the curves are based on tractor-trailer trucks comprising 10% of the vehicles crossing the track, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-4 for the appropriate distance and percentage of tractor-trailer trucks.

Standard:
09 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, then:

A. The traffic control signal shall have actuation on the minor street; B. Preemption control shall be provided in accordance with Sections 4D.27, 8C.09, and 8C.10; and C. The grade crossing shall have flashing-light signals (see Chapter 8C).

Guidance:
10 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, the grade crossing should have automatic gates (see Chapter 8C).

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 838
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
Section 4C.101(CA) Criterion for School Crossing Traffic Signals 01 Standard:

A. The signal shall be designed for full-time operation.

B. Pedestrian signal faces of the International Symbol type shall be installed at all marked crosswalks at signalized intersections along the “Suggested Route to School.” C. If an intersection is signalized under this guideline for school pedestrians, the entire intersection shall be signalized.

D. School area traffic signals shall be traffic actuated type with push buttons or other detectors for pedestrians.

Option:
02 Non-intersection school pedestrian crosswalk locations may be signalized when justified.

Revised December 9, 2015

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 839
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 840
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 841
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 842
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 843
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Appendix I
CA MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
12-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
10-11
11-12
12-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
10-11
11-12
Satisfied? NN N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
525
53 420
42 N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Condition A Minor Street Volume(70%):

Condition A Major Street Volume(70%):

Condition B Minor Street Volume (56%):
350
105
280
84 Condition A
Met?
Condition B Major Street Volume (56%):

Condition B Minor Street Volume(70%):

Condition B Major Street Volume(70%):

Condition B
Met?
Combination of
Conditions A & B
Met?
1394
1172
1143
1044
982
281
143
141
1 865
1181
1433
1027
759
513
151
Condition A Minor Street Volume (56%):

Condition A Major Street Volume (56%):
275
392
535
771
946
1253
1492
1449
14 2
7 16
12 17
15 14
15 7
19 17
Time Period Major Street Volume
(Both Approaches)
Minor Street Volumes
(Higher Approach)
Hour 6
Hour 5
Hour 4
Hour 3
Hour 2
Hour 1
0 6
5 3
Hour 11
Hour 10
Hour 9
Hour 8
Hour 7
Hour 18
836
2 32
19 Hour 17
Hour 16
Hour 15
Hour 14
Hour 13
Hour 24
Hour 23
Hour 22
Hour 21
Hour 20
Hour 19
1 2
4 4
Hour 12
Warrant 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant Satisfied? (Condition A or Condition B or Combination of A and B Must Be Satisfied)

1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
17 1394
12 1449
Higher Approach - Minor Street
Approach Lanes
1492
16 1433
32 Hour 18 Hour 8 Hour 17 Hour 16
Time Period
Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an average day.

Both Approaches - Major Street
5-6 7-8 4-5 3-4
All plotted points falls above the
applicable curve in Figure 4C-1
(Urban Areas)?
All plotted points fall above the
applicable curve in Figure 4C-2
(Rural Areas?
Warrant 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant Satisfied?

1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
Part A Part A Satisfied? N
Part B Satisfied? N

1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street-approach (one-direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two lane approach; AND

2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane or traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches.

N
N
Y
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
Warrant 3 - Peak Hour Warrant Satisfied?
Higher Approach - Minor Street 16
Time Period
The plotted point falls above the
appliable curve in Figure 4C-3
(Urban Areas)?
Hour 18
Approach Lanes 5-6
Both Approaches - Major Street 1492
Part B
(Part A or Part B must be Satisfied)

1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
N
N
Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume
Time Period
Hour 18 Hour 8 Hour 17 Hour 16
Approach Lanes 5-6 7-8 4-5 3-4
Pedestrians
Crossing the Major Street
Warrant Satisfied?
(Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisified)
The plotted point falls above the
appliable curve in Figure 4C-4
(Rural Areas)?
Part 1 (Part A or B Must Be Satisfied)
Part A
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-5 (Urban Areas)?
Part A Satisfied?
Part 1 Satisfied?
1492 1433 1449 1394
000
Vehicles
Both Approaches - Major Street
0 1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
Time Period
Approach Lanes 2-3
Vehicles
Both Approaches - Major Street 1172
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-5 (Rural Areas)?
Part B
Hour 15
Part B Satisfied?
Pedestrians
Crossing the Major Street 0

1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
Y
Y
N
Part 2
OR, The proposed traffic signal will not restrict progressive traffic flow along the major street? AND, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet? Part 2 Satisfied?
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-7 (Urban Areas)?
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-8 (Rural Areas)?

1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Warrant 5 - School Crossing
(Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied)
Warrant Satisfied?
Part A Part A Satisfied?
Part B Satisfied?
Gap/Minutes and # of Children
Gaps VS Minutes Minutes Children Using Crossing
Number of Adequate Gaps
School Age Pedestrian Crossing Street / Hr
N/A
N/A
N/A

DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System
Minimum Requirements
≥ 1000 ft North: 720 ft, South: 1750 ft, East: 0 ft, West: 0 ft.

Gaps < Minutes?
AND Children >20/Hr?
AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures? Part B
OR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic? The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet? 5 OR MORE 2

REQUIREMENTS
Warrant 1, Condition A -
Minimum Vehicular Volume
OR, Warrant 1, Condition B -
Interruption of Continous Traffic
OR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition
Ped Vol ≥ 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8
N
N
N
REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash?

CONDITIONS
N

N ONE CONDITION
SATISFIED 80%
On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning? OR, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation.

N
Warrant Satisfied?
Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency? N (All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
Warrant 7 - Crash Experience Warrant Warrant Satisfied?

1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE PINOT BLANC
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
Entering Volumes - All Approaches
During Typical Weekday Peak Hour (1508) Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday.

Fulfilled
Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets? N
OR
During Each of any 5Hrs. Of a Sat. or Sun (0) Veh/Hr?
Y
N
1000 Veh/Hr
Major
Route B
N
Major
Route A
N

CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES
Hwy. System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic? Warrant 8 - Roadway Network Warrant Satisfied?
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
Rural or
Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City? Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan? N N
NN
Y
Minimum Volume
Requirements

1. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Pinot Blanc.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Condition A Major Street Volume(70%):

Condition B Minor Street Volume (56%):
350
105
280
84 Condition A
Met?
Condition B Major Street Volume (56%):

Condition B Minor Street Volume(70%):

Condition B Major Street Volume(70%):

Condition B
Met?
Combination of
Conditions A & B
Met?
1377
1150
1112
1030
967
280
141
139
1 853
1162
1395
1018
744
519
148
Condition A Minor Street Volume (56%):

Condition A Major Street Volume (56%):
271
386
532
757
930
1243
1455
1423
30 4
18 24
22 30
23 27
21 22
17 13
Time Period Major Street Volume
(Both Approaches)
Minor Street Volumes
(Higher Approach)
Hour 6
Hour 5
Hour 4
Hour 3
Hour 2
Hour 1
1 22
8 2
Hour 11
Hour 10
Hour 9
Hour 8
Hour 7
Hour 18
829
2 41
22 Hour 17
Hour 16
Hour 15
Hour 14
Hour 13
Hour 24
Hour 23
Hour 22
Hour 21
Hour 20
Hour 19
1 6
7 11
Hour 12
Warrant 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant Satisfied? (Condition A or Condition B or Combination of A and B Must Be Satisfied)

2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
30 1377
22 1423
Higher Approach - Minor Street
Approach Lanes
1455
24 1395
41 Hour 18 Hour 8 Hour 17 Hour 16
Time Period
Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an average day.

2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
Part A Part A Satisfied? N
Part B Satisfied? N

2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane or traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches.

N
N
Y
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
Warrant 3 - Peak Hour Warrant Satisfied?
Higher Approach - Minor Street 24
Time Period
The plotted point falls above the
appliable curve in Figure 4C-3
(Urban Areas)?
Hour 18
Approach Lanes 5-6
Both Approaches - Major Street 1455
Part B
(Part A or Part B must be Satisfied)

2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
N
N
Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume
Time Period
Hour 18 Hour 8 Hour 17 Hour 16
Approach Lanes 5-6 7-8 4-5 3-4
Pedestrians
Crossing the Major Street
Warrant Satisfied?
(Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisified)
The plotted point falls above the
appliable curve in Figure 4C-4
(Rural Areas)?
Part 1 (Part A or B Must Be Satisfied)
Part A
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-5 (Urban Areas)?
Part A Satisfied?
Part 1 Satisfied?
1455 1395 1423 1377
000
Vehicles
Both Approaches - Major Street
0 2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
Time Period
Approach Lanes 2-3
Vehicles
Both Approaches - Major Street 1150
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-5 (Rural Areas)?
Part B
Hour 15
Part B Satisfied?
Pedestrians
Crossing the Major Street 0

2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System
Minimum Requirements
≥ 1000 ft North: 1680 ft, South: 800 ft, East: 0 ft, West: 0 ft.

CONDITIONS
N

2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
BE Date: 10/12/2023
RK Date: 10/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY

RUE MERLOT
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto

MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
Entering Volumes - All Approaches
During Typical Weekday Peak Hour (1479) Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday.

Fulfilled
Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets? N
OR
During Each of any 5Hrs. Of a Sat. or Sun (0) Veh/Hr?
Y
N
1000 Veh/Hr
Major
Route B
N
Major
Route A
N

2. CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Mountain at Merlot.xlsx JN:0328-2023-10

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Mountain Avenue at Rue Pinot Blanc and Rue Merlot Traffic Calming Review, dated October 16, 2023 (Ramona Expressway group, inc. engineering
MAIN ST. ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN CYPRESS AVE. AND
City of San Jacinto, California Vernon Avenue
Cypress Avenue
Artesia Street
1st Street
Main Street
1 2
Castle Court
2nd Street
3rd Street
5th Street Vernon Avenue

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway rk19406.doc
JN:0328-2023-09

VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN CYPRESS AVENUE AND

MAIN STREET ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
City of San Jacinto, California
Prepared for:

Mr. Stuart McKibbin

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P.O. Box 606
San Jacinto, CA 92572
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
1401 Dove Street, Suite 540
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Robert Kahn, P.E.

Registered Civil Engineer 20285
Registered Traffic Engineer 0555
Matthew Ramon, E.I.T.

Jethro Jay Narciso, E.I.T.

October 18, 2023

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Table of Contents

Section Page

1.0 Introduction........................................................................................... 1-1

2.0 Summary of Findings ............................................................................ 2-1

2.1 Survey Methodology 2-1

2.2 Speed Zone Recommendations 2-1

3.0 Speed Limits .......................................................................................... 3-1

4.0 Data Collection ...................................................................................... 4-1

4.1 Roadway Characteristics 4-1

4.2 Travel Speed Survey Data 4-1

4.3 Statistical Analysis 4-2

4.4 Collision History 4-2

5.0 Speed Limit Recommendations & Conclusions ..................................... 5-1

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway List of Attachments
Exhibits
Location Map ........................................................................................................... A Recommended Speed Zones .................................................................................... B

Tables
City of San Jacinto 2023 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Speed Survey Summary............................................................................................. 1

Appendices
California MUTCD Section 2B.13............................................................................... A Speed Survey Statistical Summary Sheets................................................................... B SWITRS Collision Data Sheets.................................................................................... C Speed Study Traffic Condition Summary Forms.......................................................... D

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 1-1

1.0 Introduction
This report contains the Engineering and Traffic Survey for two (2) roadway segments in the City of San Jacinto (see Exhibit A).

Speed limits for each roadway section are recommended based on the procedures and requirements set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The applicable sections of the California MUTCD are contained in Appendix A.

For each roadway segment, information is provided on the existing roadway conditions, speed characteristics, average daily traffic volumes, and collision history.

This report updates the speed limit recommendations for two (2) roadway segments based on recent data collected in 2023.

Table 1 provides a summary of the study area roadway segments, the traffic survey year, speed characteristic data, and recommended speed limits.

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 2-1

2.0 Summary of Findings

2.1 Survey Methodology

1. Speed limits are set based on the procedures and requirements set forth in the CVC and the California MUTCD.

2. All roadways were surveyed to determine existing roadway characteristics and surrounding land uses.

3. Existing travel speeds were obtained with radar speed surveys. A minimum of 100 speed observations were recorded at each survey location using calibrated and certified radar equipment. Existing speed survey statistical summary sheets are contained in Appendix B.

4. Speed observation data was calculated to determine the 85th percentile speed, the 10-mile per hour pace speed and other speed statistics.

5. Collision data was provided by SWITRS and tabulated for each roadway segment for consideration in the speed limit recommendations. Collision data sheets from the past 48 months are contained in Appendix C.

2.2 Speed Zone Recommendations

1. Based on a review of roadway segment survey data, speed zone recommendations were made on each of the roadway segments and are illustrated in Exhibit B. The speed zone survey information and recommended speed limits are also summarized in Table 1.

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 3-1

3.0 Speed Limits
This engineering and traffic survey analysis includes: (a) results of field inventories including radar samplings of speeds, (b) data analysis, and (c) recommended applicable speed limits.

The CVC is specific in its mandate for the performance of engineering and traffic surveys in regard to speed limits. In particular, Section 40802 indicates that the enforcement of speed limits with the use of radar or other electronic device that measures speed is not allowed unless the prima facie speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey within the last five, 7 or 14 years. All local agencies must conduct engineering and traffic surveys to provide the following:

1. Raise State dictated “prima facie” limits above 25 miles per hour;

2. Lower the otherwise permitted maximum speed of 65 miles per hour; and

3. Enforce speed limits by the use of radar equipment.

The CVC Rules of the Road, Section 22350 is the basis of all speed zone legislation in that it states, “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.”
Secondly, the CVC has established certain “prima facie” speed limits (Section 22352), which may not be exceeded unless the operator of a motor vehicle can prove that it is safe to do so under the Basic Speed Law.

The recommended posted speed limits are based on CA MUTCD Section 2B.13 which states:
“When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two options below:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.3.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.”

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 3-2
Additionally, the recent approval of Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43) resulted in several changes to the CVC that now authorize local jurisdictions to consider additional parameters, beyond the 85th percentile speed, when setting speed limits on certain streets.

Two of the most immediate changes to the CVC include the amendments to Section 22358, which now allow a local authority to declare a prima facie speed of 20 or 15 miles per hour on any street other than a state highway, and the amendment to Section 22358.8, which allows the current speed limit to be retained or immediately prior speed limit to be restored.
22358 (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.
(c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

AB 43 also enacted several other speed limit changes, including 22358.6 and 22358.7 which further authorize local agencies to lower speed limits, however, these changes do not go into effect until 2024 and/or until the next version of the California MUTCD is released. Section 22358.3 also authorizes a prima facie speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour on a highway contiguous to a business activity district, provided several specific provisions are met.

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 4-1

4.0 Data Collection
This section discusses the survey methodology for the collection of data on existing roadway characteristics, travel speed surveys, and collision experiences. Exhibit A illustrates the roadway locations inventoried. Speed study traffic conditions forms have been prepared for each survey location and are included in Appendix D.

4.1 Roadway Characteristics
Visual inspection of each roadway survey location was performed. Based on the visual survey, speed study traffic conditions forms were completed for data entries such as the number of travel lanes, type of median, existing posted speed limit, and the types of surrounding land uses. Other special conditions inventoried include notations on horizontal and vertical curves, school crosswalks, and school speed zones.

Total curb-to-curb width was also measured and recorded at each speed survey location.

The predominant land use adjacent to the roadway by travel direction was identified. The surrounding uses were identified by the predominant or significant types of uses defining the character and intensity of development along the roadway. Adjacent land uses have direct access if driveways serving the use intersect with the roadway and the land use directly fronts onto the roadway. Land uses not having direct access include those uses with rear or side yards facing the roadway with access from secondary or from parallel roadways. The number of driveways intersecting the roadway is defined as an approximate average distance between driveways along the road segment.

4.2 Travel Speed Survey Data
Radar speed surveys were conducted within the City. Principles for survey methods utilized in this engineering survey followed the procedures set out by the California MUTCD (Appendix A).

The California MUTCD sets forth the basic procedural steps in conducting an “engineering and traffic survey”. This method is designed for use on all City and County through-highways, arterials, and collector streets.

Surveys were conducted during off-peak hours so that free-flow conditions would allow motorists to drive at a self-determined “safe speed”. An unmarked vehicle was

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 4-2
employed as the survey vehicle, with the radar device situated inconspicuously. The vehicle was located along a straight roadway segment, far enough away from signals, stop signs, major intersections, or roadway obstruction so that motorists were traveling at a free-flow velocity before passing the sampling vehicle.

The samples were recorded in one mile per hour increments. On two-way streets, samples in both directions were obtained. Care was also taken to include a representative proportion of trucks and buses. Speed zone statistical summary sheets for each location are provided in Appendix D of this report.

4.3 Statistical Analysis
Statistical calculations included the 85th percentile (or critical) speed, 10-mile per pace speed, percentage of vehicles in the 10-mile per hour speed and 50th percentile speed. These terms are defined as follows:
85th Percentile Speed
The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the vehicles traveled. It is the single most important measure used to determine posted speed limits.
10-Mile Per Hour Pace Speed
The 10-mile per hour pace speed is the 10-mile per hour range within which the largest number of observations fall. Typically, 70 percent of the vehicles are contained in this range, with 15% above and 15% below. A properly set speed limit will maximize the percent of vehicles in the 10-mile per hour pace speed.

Average Speed
The average or arithmetic mean speed characteristics of the speed observations which is calculated by dividing the summation of all observed speeds by the number of observations.

4.4 Collision History
Collision data for each of the survey segments were reviewed. Collisions that occurred within 250 feet of the boundary intersections of each segment were not included in the collision rate calculation of the segment, but rather attributed to the intersection.

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 5-1

5.0 Speed Limit Recommendations & Conclusions
When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. In accordance with the California MUTCD:

Experience has shown that speed limits should be established at or below the 85th percentile speed. The speed chosen for speed zoning should be in 5-mile per hour increments and should normally be selected at a value nearest below the 85th percentile speed.

In general, the 85th percentile speed will dictate the speed limit to be established pursuant to the reasoning that most drivers are “reasonable and prudent”. Speed limit selections resulting from this survey and analysis thus follow the above guideline. Recommended speed limits are for both directions of travel.

1. Higher than average collision histories;

2. Other physical features of the roadway, which are not readily apparent to the driver. These hazards include cross gutters, poor sight distance, and close spacing of controlled intersections; and

3. Compatibility and continuity with speed zones of adjacent cities and/or adjacent reaches of the same street within the City.

The recommended speed limits and results of the analysis are summarized in Table 1 and graphically shown in Exhibit B.

For both segments of Vernon Avenue, the recommended speed limit of 25 mph is based on the prima facie speed limit for a local street within a residence district in accordance with CVC 22352(b)(1). As such, traffic calming measures are recommended along both segments to account for the 9 mph and 15 mph deviation from the existing 85th percentile speed.

The following items are recommended along the segments:

1. Install double-yellow centerline striping (Detail 22) along Vernon Avenue between Cypress Avenue and Main Street.

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway 5-2

2. Install white 6” edge line striping (Detail 27B) to narrow the road throughout both segments. Install an 8’ parking lane and one 12’ wide travel lane in each direction along Vernon Avenue between 1st Street and Main Street.

3. Post 25 mph speed limit signs (R2-1) and, if needed, 25 MPH pavement markings along the segments.

4. Consider the feasibility of solar-powered radar feedback signs along Vernon Avenue between 1st Street and Main Street.

5. Increase police enforcement of the 25 mph speed limit.

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Exhibits

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway engineering
group, inc. VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN CYPRESS AVE. AND MAIN ST. ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-09
N
Location Map
Exhibit A Vernon Avenue
Cypress Avenue
Artesia Street
1st Street
Main Street
= Street Segment Number
Legend:
1 1
2 Castle Court
2nd Street
3rd Street
5th Street
= Segments Vernon Avenue

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway engineering
group, inc. VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN CYPRESS AVE. AND MAIN ST. ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-09
N
Recommended Speed Zones
Exhibit B Vernon Avenue
Cypress Avenue
Artesia Street
1st Street
Main Street
= Street Segment Number
Legend:
1 1
2 Castle Court
2nd Street
3rd Street
5th Street Vernon Avenue
= Recommended 25 mph
Prima Facie Speed Limit

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

Tables

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Loc.

No. Roadway Segment
Traffic
Survey
Year
Posted
Speed Limit
(MPH)1
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
10 mph
Pace Speed
(MPH)
Percent
Within
10 MPH
Pace
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Reason for
Adjustment
from 85th
Percentile
Speed2
Vernon Avenue
1 Cypress Avenue to 1st Street 2023 NP 34 26-35 90% 25 3, 6, 10 2 1st Street to Main Street 2023 NP 40 30-39 62% 25 3, 6, 10

9. Restore immediately prior speed limit per CVC 22358.8

10. Prima Facie speed limit established per CVC 22352 (b)(1) 1 Posted speed limit at time of survey. NP = Not Posted. 2 Reason for Adjustment from 85th Percentile Speed:

1. Roadway characteristics such as shifting alignment, sight distance constraints,railroad crossings, or curves not obvious to driver, etc.

2. 10 mph pace speed

3. Roadside development and environment such as direct residential or commercial access and close vicinity to activity areas such as schools, parks, churches, community centers, or hospitals.

4. On-street parking, mid-block crosswalks, or high pedestrian activity area

5. High collision rate

6. High residential and/or business density
Table 1
City of San Jacinto 2023 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Speed Survey Summary

7. Pedestrian and bicycle safety

8. Retain current speed limit per CVC 22358.8
03282309_Draft Tables.xls
JN:0328-2023-09

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated Appendix A
California MUTCD Section 2B.13

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway Appendix B
Speed Survey Statistical Summary Sheets

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Vernon Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cypress Avenue - 1st Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 9:55
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 10:50
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 Existing
37 0 2 37 X X 2 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 7 4 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
34 2 0 34 X X 2 *
33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *
32 5 3 32 X X X X X X X X 8 P
31 4 6 31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 7 7 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C % Over Pace: 2% 4% 3% 29 8 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
28 6 7 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * % In Pace: 94% 86% 90% 27 4 3 27 X X X X X X X 7 *
26 3 4 26 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 4% 10% 7%
25 1 2 25 X X X 3
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 30 MPH 29 MPH 30 MPH
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 1 1 22 X X 2 Pace Speed: 26 - 35 MPH 26 - 35 MPH 26 - 35 MPH 21 0 1 21 X 1
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 26 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 29 MPH 30 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of San Jacinto
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/26/23

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Vernon Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: 1st Street - Main Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 9:55
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 2 44 X X 2
43 2 0 43 X X 2
42 2 1 42 X X X 3
41 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 % Over Pace: 24% 12% 18%
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 62% 62% 62%
37 3 3 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 3 4 36 X X X X X X X 7 P % Under Pace: 14% 26% 20%
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 A
34 3 4 34 X X X X X X X 7 C Average Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 33 2 1 33 X X X 3 E
32 3 4 32 X X X X X X X 7 * Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 *
30 7 4 30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
29 2 2 29 X X X X 4 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 26 MPH 28 MPH 28 2 1 28 X X X 3
27 2 2 27 X X X X 4 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 32 MPH 34 MPH 26 0 2 26 X X 2
25 1 5 25 X X X X X X 6 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of San Jacinto
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/26/23

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated Appendix C
SWITRS Collision Data Sheets

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 827
Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated Appendix D

Speed Study Traffic Condition Summary Forms

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway

5.3.d
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Cypress Ave and Main St Engineering and Traffic Survey, dated October 18, 2023 (Ramona Expressway September 13, 2023
Mr. Stuart McKibbin

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P.O. Box 606
San Jacinto, CA 92572
Subject: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, City of San Jacinto, CA
Dear Mr. Stuart McKibbin:

A. Introduction
RK ENGINGEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this traffic review of Vernon Avenue between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue and all-way stop warrant analysis for the intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis location is shown in Exhibit A.

The purpose of this traffic review is to develop recommendations for improving current and future operations at the study intersections based on a review of traffic volumes, collision history, intersection geometrics, and existing sight distances. The analysis will determine the recommended speed limit at the roadway segments as well as whether the study intersection meets the warrants for an all-way stop, based on the existing conditions.

The recommended improvements are included in the Conclusions section of this report.

B. Existing Conditions
The location of the study intersection is shown in Exhibit A. The four-legged intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place is currently cross-street stop controlled on the eastbound approach of Field Maple Place and westbound approach of Burt Street. No pedestrian crosswalks currently exist at the study intersection. There are currently no posted speed limits along Vernon Avenue.

Existing traffic volumes for the study intersection were compiled for RK in August 2023.

The vehicle traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle count worksheets are included in Appendix A. A summary of the hourly traffic counts is included for Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place in Table 1.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
2 TABLE 1
Existing Hourly Traffic Counts
Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Tuesday, August 22, 2023

END TIME
Vernon Avenue Burt Street/Field Maple Place Grand
NB SB Total Subtotal
NB + SB EB WB Subtotal EB + WB
1:00 AM 8 26 34 1 2 3 37
2:00 AM 6 14 20 0 2 2 22
3:00 AM 5 8 13 4 1 5 18
4:00 AM 27 7 34 7 9 16 50
5:00 AM 53 18 71 9 5 14 85
6:00 AM 66 14 80 11 16 27 107
7:00 AM 100 54 154 28 30 58 212
8:00 AM 128 98 226 38 45 83 309
9:00 AM 117 199 316 32 28 60 376
10:00 AM 67 66 133 31 32 63 196
11:00 AM 43 61 104 24 33 57 161
12:00 PM 62 80 142 34 31 65 207
1:00 PM 40 76 116 19 24 43 159
2:00 PM 61 90 151 20 25 45 196
3:00 PM 71 147 218 47 39 86 304
4:00 PM 84 284 368 37 42 79 447
5:00 PM 61 204 265 20 34 54 319
6:00 PM 59 138 197 25 23 48 245
7:00 PM 43 138 181 23 25 48 229
8:00 PM 45 90 135 21 23 44 179
9:00 PM 25 75 100 13 12 25 125
10:00 PM 23 57 80 7 9 16 96
11:00 PM 16 46 62 10 9 19 81
12:00 AM 13 37 50 3 1 4 54
TOTAL 1,223 2,027 3,250 464 500 964 4,214

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
3 C. Sight Distance Review
The existing sight distance at the study intersection was analyzed as part of this review. A representative from RK (Jethro Narciso, Senior Engineer) completed a field review of the intersection on Thursday, August 17, 2023.

Per the City of San Jacinto Adopted General Plan Policy Document, dated November 15, 2022, Vernon Avenue, Burt Street, and Field Maple Place are classified as local streets.

Based on the County of Riverside Standard Plan No. 114, the preferred design speed of a flat local street is 30 miles per hour. The design speed of the major street, Vernon Avenue, shall be utilized for the sight distance review in order to be conservative. As outlined in the County of Riverside Standard Plan No. 821, the standard for the intersection corner sight distance for a design speed of 30 miles per hour is 330 feet.

As part of the analysis, a sight line is developed and a “limited use area” is created which designates an area between the edge of pavement and the driver’s line of sight. This area prohibits obstructions in order to maintain adequate sight distance at the intersection. The Riverside County standard states that the “limited use area (shall be) kept clear of all obstructions over 2.5 feet high, including vegetation. No trees, walls, or any obstructions shall be allowed in the limited use area.”
Exhibit B-1 and Exhibit B-2 illustrates the intersection sight distance for the westbound and eastbound approach, respectively. Additionally, Exhibit C-1 and Exhibit C-2 provide a street view of the eastbound/westbound left and right approach and highlights the obstructions to the corner sight distance.

As shown in Exhibit C-1, the study intersection has an obstructed corner sight distance due to the walls and signage located along Vernon Avenue north and south of Burt Street.

Similarly, as shown in Exhibit C-2, the study intersection has an obstructed corner sight distance due to the walls and signage located along Vernon Avenue north and of Maple Field Place.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
4 D. Collision History
Collision data for the intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street, the roadway segment of Vernon Avenue between Ramona Expressway/Burt Avenue, and the roadway segment of Vernon Avenue between Burt Street/Cypress Avenue were reviewed. RK has obtained collision data from SWITRS for 2020-2023
According to the collision data and as summarized in Table 2, no collisions have occurred during a 12-month period within 250 feet of the intersection nor within the roadway segments in the past four (4) years.

TABLE 2
Study Intersection Collision Summary
2020 – 2023
Intersection/Segment
Year
Total
2020 2021 2022 2023
Vernon Avenue at Burt Street 0 0 0 0 0
Vernon Avenue btw. Ramona Expressway/Burt Street 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Avenue btw. Burt Street/Cypress Avenue 0 0 0 0 0 A full copy of the collision data is included in RK’s files.

E. Travel Speed Survey Data
Radar speed surveys were conducted on the north leg and south leg of Vernon Avenue.

Principles for survey methods utilized in this engineering survey followed the procedures set out by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The California MUTCD sets forth the basic procedural steps in conducting an “engineering and traffic survey”. This method is designed for use on all City and County through-highways, arterials, and collector streets.

Surveys were conducted during off-peak hours so that free-flow conditions would allow motorists to drive at a self-determined “safe speed”. An unmarked vehicle was employed as the survey vehicle, with the radar device situated inconspicuously. The vehicle was located along a straight roadway segment, far enough away from signals, stop signs, major intersections, or roadway obstruction so that motorists were traveling at a free-flow velocity before passing the sampling vehicle.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
5 The samples were recorded in one mile per hour increments. 100 samples total were taken50 samples in the northbound approach and southbound approach each.

Statistical calculations included the 85th percentile (or critical) speed, 10-mile per pace speed, percentage of vehicles in the 10-mile per hour speed and 50th percentile speed.

These terms are defined as follows:
 Average Speed: The average or arithmetic mean speed characteristics of the speed observations which is calculated by dividing the summation of all observed speeds by the number of observations.
 85th Percentile Speed: The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the vehicles traveled. It is the single most important measure used to determine posted speed limits.
 10-Mile Per Hour Pace Speed: The 10-mile per hour pace speed is the 10-mile per hour range within which the largest number of observations fall. Typically, 70 percent of the vehicles are contained in this range, with 15% above and 15% below. A properly set speed limit will maximize the percent of vehicles in the 10- mile per hour pace speed.

The collected radar speed surveys are provided in Appendix B.

F. Engineering and Traffic Survey
When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic. In accordance with the CA MUTCD Section 2B.13:
“When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two options below:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.3.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
6 2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.”
In general, the 85th percentile speed will dictate the speed limit to be established pursuant to the reasoning that most drivers are “reasonable and prudent”. Speed limit selections resulting from this survey and analysis thus follow the above guideline. Recommended speed limits are for both directions of travel.

The primary selected speed limits were then considered in relation to roadway characteristics, collision experience, and nearby development on each respective roadway segment. Some of these characteristics may warrant a deviation from the 85th percentile speed. These characteristics include:
 Higher than average collision histories;
 Other physical features of the roadway, which are not readily apparent to the driver.

These hazards include cross gutters, poor sight distance, and close spacing of controlled intersections; and
 Compatibility and continuity with speed zones of adjacent cities and/or adjacent reaches of the same street within the City.

As previously discussed, there is currently no posted speed limit along Vernon Avenue. As seen in Appendix B, the 85th percentile speed of the north leg and south leg at the intersection is 51 miles per hour and 47 miles per hour, respectively.

As such, RK recommends a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour for the segment between Ramona Expressway and Burt Street and 40 miles per hour for the segment between Burt Street and Cypress Avenue. As previously discussed, zero (0) collisions have occurred in the previous four (4) years, which suggests that current speeds are appropriate.

Furthermore, due to a low number of pedestrian/bicyclists (as shown in Appendix A), there is no need to reduce speeds more than necessary. However, due to the existence of pedestrian facilities and the surrounding residential land uses, it is appropriate to take the 5 mile per hour reduction permitted in the CA MUTCD Section 2B.13.

Table 3 summarizes the results of the engineering and traffic survey.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
7 Table 3
City of San Jacinto 2023 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Speed Survey Summary
Loc.

No.

Roadway
Segment
Traffic
Survey
Year
Posted
Speed
Limit
(MPH)1
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
10 mph
Pace
Speed
(MPH)
Percent
Within
10 MPH
Pace
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Reason for
Adjustment
from 85th
Percentile
Speed2
Vernon
Avenue
1 Ramona
Express to
Burt
Street/Field
Maple Place
2023 NP 51 42-51 71% 45 2, 7
2 Burt
Street/Field
Maple Place
to Cypress
Avenue
2023 NP 47 36-45 68% 40 2, 7
1 Posted speed limit at time of survey. NP = Not Posted. 2 Reason for Adjustment from 85th Percentile Speed:

1. Roadway characteristics such as shifting alignment, sight distance constraints, railroad crossings, or curves not obvious to driver, etc.

2. 10 mph pace speed

3. Roadside development and environment such as direct residential or commercial access and close vicinity to activity areas such as schools, parks,
churches, community centers, or hospitals.

4. On-street parking, mid-block crosswalks, or high pedestrian activity area

5. High collision rate

6. High residential and/or business density

7. Pedestrian and bicycle safety

8. Retain current speed limit per CVC 22358.8

9. Restore immediately prior speed limit per CVC 22358.8

10. Prima Facie speed limit established per CVC 22352 (b)(1) G. All- Way Stop Warrant Analysis
The study area intersection has been evaluated for an all-way stop warrant using the criteria of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) standards.

A copy of the CA MUTCD all-way stop warrant conditions is included in Appendix D. The all-way stop warrants worksheet is provided in Appendix E for existing conditions.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
8 The following criteria are applicable for this analysis:
 Traffic signal warranted
 Collisions
 Minimum volumes
 80% of collision criteria and minimum volume
 The need to control left-turn conflicts
 The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts
 Sight distance constraints
 An intersection of two (2) residential neighborhood collector streets The specific CA MUTCD All-Way Stop Warrants have been tabulated and listed below:

TABLE 4
CA MUTCD All-Way Stop Warrants
Warrant Description Results
A Traffic Signal Warranted Does Not Satisfy
B Collisions Does Not Satisfy
C Minimum Volumes Does Not Satisfy
D Combination Minimum Values Does Not Satisfy
E Left-Turn Conflicts Does Not Satisfy
F Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts Does Not Satisfy
G Sight Distance Constraints Satisfied
H Intersection of Residential Collector Streets Does Not Satisfy

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
9 a. Warrant A
Warrant A states that an all-way stop could be implemented as an interim measure when traffic signals are warranted. A copy of the Caltrans traffic signal warrant criteria is provided in Appendix F. The Caltrans traffic signal warrants worksheets are included in Appendix G.

The following criteria are applicable for this analysis:
 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume
 Four Hour Vehicular Volume
 Peak Hour
 Pedestrian Volume
 School Crossing
 Coordinated Signal System
 Crash Warrant
 Roadway Network
As shown in Appendix G, the intersection does not meet any of the traffic signal warrants per the Caltrans traffic signal warrants criteria.

As a result, the intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place does not satisfy Warrant A.
b. Warrant B
To satisfy this warrant, there must be five (5) or more collisions within a 12-month period that are correctable by an all-way stop.

As previously discussed, RK has obtained collision data from SWITRS for 2020 - 2023.

According to the collision data, zero (0) reported collisions have occurred within 250 feet of the study intersection within a 12-month period in the previous four (4) years.

Therefore, Warrant B has not been met for existing conditions. A full copy of the collision data is included in RK’s files.
c. Warrant C
Warrant C states that a traffic signal could be implemented at an intersection if both of the following conditions are met:

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
10  Condition 1: The average volume on the major street (for both approaches) for any 8-hours must be a minimum of 300 vehicles per hour; AND  Condition 2: The average volume on the minor street (for both approaches) for the same 8-hours must be a minimum of 200 vehicles per hour with an average delay of 30 seconds per vehicle for the highest hour
However, if the critical speed (i.e. 85th percentile speed) of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, then Warrant C can also be met if the intersection meets 70% of the aforementioned threshold.

The intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place does not meet the sub-criteria for the major street or the minor street. As seen in Appendix B, the critical speed of the north leg is 51 miles per hour and the critical speed of the south leg is 49 miles per hour. As such, the third sub-criteria is applicable. The intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place does not meet the final sub-criteria.

As a result, the intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place does not satisfy Warrant C.
d. Warrant D
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80% of the minimum values, then Warrant D would be satisfied. For the existing condition, the study intersection does meet the 80% threshold for Criteria C.1, but does not meet the 80% threshold for Criteria B or C.2. Therefore, the study intersection is unable to satisfy Warrant D.
e. Warrant E
An intersection would satisfy Warrant E if there is a need to control left-turn conflicts.

The study intersection does not have a need to control left-turn conflicts and as such, the study intersection does not satisfy Warrant E.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
11 f. Warrant F
Warrant F would be satisfied if there is a need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volume. However, the study intersection generates low pedestrian volume and would therefore not satisfy Warrant F. g. Warrant G
Warrant G would be satisfied if the road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to reasonably safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop at a location.

As shown in the field review photographs, the study intersection has an obstructed corner sight distance due to the obstruction from existing block walls and signage along Vernon Avenue.

As a result, the intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place satisfies Warrant G and an all-way stop control is warranted. h. Warrant H
Warrant H would be satisfied if an intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multiway stop control would improve traffic operational characters of the intersection.

Vernon Avenue is classified as a local street and Burt Street/Field Maple Place is classified as a local street per the City of San Jacinto General Plan; hence, Warrant H is not satisfied.

Conclusions
This traffic review of Vernon Avenue between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue was conducted to determine the recommended speed limit at the roadway segments of Ramona Expressway to Burt Street/Field Maple Place and Burt Street/Field Maple Place to Cypress Avenue, and to evaluate the intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place for an all-way stop warrant using the criteria of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) standards.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
12 The segment of Vernon Avenue between Ramona Expressway and Burt Street/Field Maple Place is recommended to have a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour. The segment of Vernon Avenue between Burt Street/Field Maple Place is recommended to have a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour. In both cases, the existence of pedestrian facilities and the surrounding residential land uses makes it appropriate to reduce speeds, based on the CA MUTCD standards.

The intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place meets Warrant G (i.e. Sight Distance Constraints) for an all-way stop, based on the CA MUTCD standards.

The following items are recommended at the study intersection and segments:

1. Install an All-Way Stop Control with appropriate signage (i.e. R1-1 and R1-3P) and stencils at the study intersection of Vernon Avenue at Burt Street/Field Maple Place.

2. Refresh and/or install a double-yellow centerline stripe (Detail 22) and white 6” edge line striping (Detail 27B) along the north and south legs of the intersection until Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue, respectively, to account for speeds and road usage.

3. Maintain trimmed foliage at Vernon Avenue to provide sight distance and continue to monitor sight distance for obstructions due to landscaping.

4. Install speed limit signage (R2-1) with recommended speed limits along Vernon Avenue.

5. Continue to monitor future needs for a traffic signal on an annual basis.

It is recommended that the intersection be monitored annually for an increase in traffic volumes and sufficient sight distance.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 19340
13 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. is pleased to provide this Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review.

If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need further review, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 474-0809.

Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

Robert Kahn, P.E. Jethro Jay Narciso, E.I.T
Founding Principal Senior Engineer
X.C. Kristy Rightmire, City of San Jacinto
Attachments
Matthew Ramon, E.I.T
rk19340.doc Engineer I
JN:0328-2023-06

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Exhibits

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona engineering
group, inc.

N
Location Map
Exhibit A
VERNON AVENUE AT BURT STREET/FIELD MAPLE PLACE ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-06
= Study Intersection of Burt Street/Field Maple Place at Vernon Avenue Legend: Vernon Avenue
Field Maple Place Burt Street

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona = Driver's Eye at Intersection of Burt Street at Vernon Avenue Legend: = Limited Use Area of Burt Street at Vernon Avenue engineering group, inc. VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN RAMONA EXPRESSWAY AND CYPRESS AVENUE TRAFFIC REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-06 Intersection Corner Sight Distance Exhibit B-1 Westbound Burt Street N
Burt Street Vernon Avenue 330' 330'
Field Maple Place

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 846
Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated = Driver's Eye at Intersection of Field Maple Place at Vernon Avenue Legend: = Limited Use Area of Field Maple Place at Vernon Avenue engineering group, inc. VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN RAMONA EXPRESSWAY AND CYPRESS AVENUE TRAFFIC REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-06 Intersection Corner Sight Distance Exhibit B-2 Eastbound Field Maple Place N
Field Maple Place Vernon Avenue 330' 330'
Burt Street

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 847
Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated engineering
group, inc. VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN RAMONA EXPRESSWAY AND CYPRESS AVENUE TRAFFIC REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-06
Street View of Westbound Approach of Burt Street
Exhibit C-1
Obstructed Corner Sight Distance
Block walls obstruct
corner sight distance
Signage along sidewalks obstruct corner sight distance
Vernon Avenue
Burt Street
Block walls obstruct
corner sight distance
Signage along sidewalks obstruct corner sight distance
Vernon Avenue
Burt Street
Westbound Right Approach
Westbound Left Approach

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Vernon Avenue
Field Maple Place
Block walls obstruct
corner sight distance
Vernon Avenue
Field Maple Place
engineering
group, inc. VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN RAMONA EXPRESSWAY AND CYPRESS AVENUE TRAFFIC REVIEW, City of San Jacinto, CA 0328-2023-06
Street View of Eastbound Approach of Field Maple Place
Exhibit C-2
Obstructed Corner Sight Distance
Eastbound Right Approach
Eastbound Left Approach

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Appendices

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Appendix A
Vehicle, Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Location: San Jacinto Date: 8/22/2023
N/S: Vernon Avenue Day Tuesday
E/W: Field Maple Pl/Burt St
North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg
Vernon Avenue Burt Street Vernon Avenue Field Maple Place 0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
3133 10
0211 4
0200 2
0400 4
0000 0
1000 1
0110 2
0000 0
0100 1
0000 0
0100 1
0000 0
0000 0
0100 1
0000 0
0100 1
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0010 1
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0010 1
0000 0
0100 1
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0200 2
0400 4
0200 2
0020 2
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0000 0
4 23 9 4 40
12:30 AM

PEDESTRIANS
Time TOTAL
12:00 AM
12:15 AM
3:30 AM
12:45 AM
1:00 AM
1:15 AM
1:30 AM
1:45 AM
2:00 AM
2:15 AM
2:30 AM
2:45 AM
3:00 AM
3:15 AM
6:30 AM
3:45 AM
4:00 AM
4:15 AM
4:30 AM
4:45 AM
5:00 AM
5:15 AM
5:30 AM
5:45 AM
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
9:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
12:30 PM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
3:30 PM
12:45 PM
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
6:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
9:30 PM
6:45 PM
7:00 PM
7:15 PM
7:30 PM
7:45 PM
8:00 PM
8:15 PM
8:30 PM
8:45 PM
9:00 PM
9:15 PM
11:15 PM
11:30 PM
11:45 PM
TOTAL VOLUMES:
9:45 PM
10:00 PM
10:15 PM
10:30 PM
10:45 PM
11:00 PM

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Location: Date: 8/22/2023
N/S: Day: Tuesday
E/W:

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000100 1
001000000000 1
010000000000 1
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000020000 2
000000000000 0
000100000000 1
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000001 1
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
010000000000 1
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000100000 1
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
200000020010 5
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000010000000 1
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000010000000 1
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
000000000000 0
2 2 1 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 1 1 16
Eastbound
Vernon Avenue Burt Street Vernon Avenue Field Maple Place 12:00 AM
San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Field Maple Pl/Burt

BICYCLES
Southbound Westbound Northbound
1:45 AM
2:00 AM
2:15 AM
2:30 AM
2:45 AM
3:00 AM
12:15 AM
12:30 AM
12:45 AM
1:00 AM
1:15 AM
1:30 AM
4:45 AM
5:00 AM
5:15 AM
5:30 AM
5:45 AM
6:00 AM
3:15 AM
3:30 AM
3:45 AM
4:00 AM
4:15 AM
4:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
9:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
12:00 PM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
6:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
7:45 PM
8:00 PM
8:15 PM
8:30 PM
8:45 PM
9:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
7:00 PM
7:15 PM
7:30 PM
10:45 PM
11:00 PM
11:15 PM
11:30 PM
11:45 PM
TOTAL VOLUMES:
9:15 PM
9:30 PM
9:45 PM
10:00 PM
10:15 PM
10:30 PM

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Appendix
B
Radar Speed Surveys

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Vernon Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Ramona Expressway/ Burt Street
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:00
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 9:40
59 1 0 59 X 1
58 0 0 58 0 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 3 1 55 X X X X 4
54 1 2 54 X X X 3
53 2 1 53 X X X 3
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 4 2 51 X X X X X X 6 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 3 2 50 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 18% 12% 15%
49 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 P % In Pace: 70% 72% 71%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5 A
46 6 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C % Under Pace: 12% 16% 14% 45 3 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
44 6 3 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 43 2 5 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 * Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 3 1 41 X X X X 4
40 0 2 40 X X 2
39 1 2 39 X X X 3 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH 38 1 0 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 45 MPH 46 MPH 36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 3 35 X X X 3 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of San Jacinto
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/22/23

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Vernon Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Burt Street - Cypress Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:40
52 0 1 52 X 1
51 2 0 51 X X 2 Time
50 4 2 50 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:20
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 4 2 46 X X X X X X 6
45 1 3 45 X X X X 4 *
44 1 2 44 X X X 3 *
43 1 4 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 6 2 42 X X X X X X X X 8 P
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 20% 16% 22%
39 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 60% 76% 68%
37 3 3 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 4 8 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Under Pace: 20% 8% 10% 35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 4 1 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of San Jacinto
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/22/23

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated Appendix C
County of Riverside
Standard No. 821 – Intersection Sight Distance
Standard No. 114 – Roadway Design Requirements

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 858
Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 859
Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated Appendix D
CA MUTCD Guidelines on All-Way Stop Warrants

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 129
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Support:
17 Caltrans will grant such permission only when an investigation indicates that the STOP (R1-1) sign will benefit traffic.

Support:
03 The use of STOP signs at grade crossings is described in Sections 8B.04 and 8B.05.

Section 2B.07 Multi-Way Stop Applications
Support:
01 Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist.

C. Minimum volumes:

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and

3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.

D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Option:
05 Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 130
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Section 2B.09 YIELD Sign Applications
Option:
01 YIELD signs may be installed:

A. On the approaches to a through street or highway where conditions are such that a full stop is not always required.

B. At the second crossroad of a divided highway, where the median width at the intersection is 30 feet or greater.

In this case, a STOP or YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the first roadway of a divided highway, and a YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the second roadway.

D. At an intersection where a special problem exists and where engineering judgment indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by the use of the YIELD sign.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Appendix E
CA MUTCD All-Way Stop Warrants Worksheet

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona CA MUTCD 2014

ALL-WAY STOP WARRANTS
2014 Edition
Major Street: CALC MR DATE 9/12/2023
Minor Street: CHK RK DATE 9/12/2023
Scenario:

CRITERIA SATISFIED FOR FOUR-WAY STOP CONTROL: YES
Any one of the following criteria may warrant four-way stop control:

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 SATISFIED = NO hours of an average day, and Total Volume = 241

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) SATISFIED = NO averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average Minor Volume = 67 delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but

Major Street Vehicles 154 226 316 218 368 265 197 181 1925 241 Minor Street Vehicles 58 83 60 86 79 54 48 48 516 65
Pedestrians 4 9 2 0 0 1 0 0 16 2
Subtotal 62 92 62 86 79 55 48 48 532 67
TOTAL AVERAGE HOURLY VOLUME 307
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 SATISFIED = NO are all satisfied to 80% of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Other criteria that may be considered include:

VERNON AVE

BURT ST/FIELD MAPLE

WEEKDAY
Sect. 2B.07 to 2B.08 November 7, 2014

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Appendix F
CA MUTCD Guidelines on Traffic Signal Warrants

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 830
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
CHAPTER 4C. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL NEEDS STUDIES
Section 4C.01 Studies and Factors for Justifying Traffic Control Signals Standard:
01 An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified at a particular location.
01a On State highways, the engineering study shall include consideration of a roundabout (yield control). If a roundabout is determined to provide a viable and practical solution, it shall be studied in lieu of, or in addition to a traffic control signal.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 831
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
approach should be considered two lanes if approximately half of the traffic on the approach turns left and the left-turn lane is of sufficient length to accommodate all left-turn vehicles. 10 Similar engineering judgment and rationale should be applied to a street approach with one through/left-turn lane plus a right-turn lane. In this case, the degree of conflict of minor-street right-turn traffic with traffic on the major street should be considered. Thus, right-turn traffic should not be included in the minor-street volume if the movement enters the major street with minimal conflict. The approach should be evaluated as a one-lane approach with only the traffic volume in the through/left-turn lane considered. 11 At a location that is under development or construction and where it is not possible to obtain a traffic count that would represent future traffic conditions, hourly volumes should be estimated as part of an engineering study for comparison with traffic signal warrants. Except for locations where the engineering study uses the satisfaction of Warrant 8 to justify a signal, a traffic control signal installed under projected conditions should have an engineering study done within 1 year of putting the signal into stop-and-go operation to determine if the signal is justified. If not justified, the signal should be taken out of stop-and-go operation or removed. 12 For signal warrant analysis, a location with a wide median, even if the median width is greater than 30 feet, should be considered as one intersection.

Option:
17 Engineering study data may include the following:

E. The posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the uncontrolled approaches to the location.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 832
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
pavement markings, roadway lighting, driveways, nearby railroad crossings, distance to nearest traffic control signals, utility poles and fixtures, and adjacent land use.

A. Vehicle-hours of stopped time delay determined separately for each approach.

B. The number and distribution of acceptable gaps in vehicular traffic on the major street for entrance from the minor street.

C. The posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on controlled approaches at a point near to the intersection but unaffected by the control.

D. Pedestrian delay time for at least two 30-minute peak pedestrian delay periods of an average weekday or like periods of a Saturday or Sunday.

E. Queue length on stop-controlled approaches.

Support:
20 Figure 4C–101(CA) and 4C-103(CA) are examples of warrant sheets.

Guidance:
21 Figure 4C-103(CA) should be used only for new intersections or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

Standard:
04 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 833
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
Standard:
07 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours.

A. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day:

2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes; and

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 834
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals

Guidance:
06 If this warrant is the only warrant met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal should be traffic-actuated.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or midblock crossing shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

Guidance:
06 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, then:

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 835
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
accommodations should be made through curb extensions or other techniques to provide adequate sight distance, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings.

C. Furthermore, if it is installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated.

Guidance:
05 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, then:

C. Furthermore, if it is installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 836
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
Guidance:
03 The Coordinated Signal System signal warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of traffic control signals would be less than 1,000 feet.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met:

A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow.

B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city.

C. It appears as a major route on an official plan, such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic and transportation study.

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 837
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Among the alternatives that should be considered or tried are:

Standard:
03 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following criteria are met:

Guidance:
04 The following considerations apply when plotting the traffic volume data on Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10:

C. If the rail traffic arrival times are unknown, the highest traffic volume hour of the day should be used.

Standard:
09 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, then:

Guidance:
10 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, the grade crossing should have automatic gates (see Chapter 8C).

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 838
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
Section 4C.101(CA) Criterion for School Crossing Traffic Signals 01 Standard:

A. The signal shall be designed for full-time operation.

D. School area traffic signals shall be traffic actuated type with push buttons or other detectors for pedestrians.

Option:
02 Non-intersection school pedestrian crosswalk locations may be signalized when justified.

Revised December 9, 2015

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 839
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 840
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 841
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 842
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 843
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona Appendix
G
CA MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
N
12-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
10-11
11-12
12-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
10-11
11-12
Satisfied? N N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
525
53 420
42 N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Condition A Minor Street Volume(70%):

Condition A Major Street Volume(70%):

Condition B Minor Street Volume (56%):
350
105
280
84 Condition A
Met?
Condition B Major Street Volume (56%):

Condition B Minor Street Volume(70%):

Condition B Major Street Volume(70%):

Condition B
Met?
Combination of
Conditions A & B
Met?
368
218
151
116
142
34 13
20 2
133
316
226
154
80 71
34 Condition A Minor Street Volume (56%):

Condition A Major Street Volume (56%):

Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
50 62
80 100
135
181
197
265
32 3
25 25
34 42
47 25
24 34
33 32
Time Period Major Street Volume
(Both Approaches)
Minor Street Volumes
(Higher Approach)
Hour 6
Hour 5
Hour 4
Hour 3
Hour 2
Hour 1
2 16
9 9
Hour 11
Hour 10
Hour 9
Hour 8
Hour 7
Hour 18
104
4 45
30 Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Hour 17
Hour 16
Hour 15
Hour 14
Hour 13
Hour 24
Hour 23
Hour 22
Hour 21
Hour 20
Hour 19
10 9
13 23
Hour 12
Roadway
Classification
Rural
Warrant 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant Satisfied? (Condition A or Condition B or Combination of A and B Must Be Satisfied) CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Vernon at Burt.xlsx
JN:0328-2023-04

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
N
25 197
42 368
Higher Approach - Minor Street
Approach Lanes
226
45 218
47 Hour 8 Hour 15 Hour 16 Hour 18
Time Period
Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an average day.

Both Approaches - Major Street
7-8 2-3 3-4 5-6
Part A Satisfied? N
All plotted points falls above the
applicable curve in Figure 4C-1
(Urban Areas)?
All plotted points fall above the
applicable curve in Figure 4C-2
(Rural Areas?
Part A

2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane or traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
N
N
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
Warrant 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant Satisfied? Warrant 3 - Peak Hour Warrant Satisfied?
(Part A or Part B must be Satisfied)
CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Vernon at Burt.xlsx
JN:0328-2023-04

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
Part B Satisfied? N

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. N Higher Approach - Minor Street 42
Time Period
The plotted point falls above the
appliable curve in Figure 4C-3
(Urban Areas)?
Hour 16
Approach Lanes 3-4
Both Approaches - Major Street 368
Part B
CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Vernon at Burt.xlsx
JN:0328-2023-04

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
N
N
Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume
Time Period
Hour 15 Hour 17 Hour 18 Hour 20
Approach Lanes 2-3 4-5 5-6 7-8
Pedestrians
Crossing the Major Street
Warrant Satisfied?
(Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisified)
The plotted point falls above the
appliable curve in Figure 4C-4
(Rural Areas)?
Part 1 (Part A or B Must Be Satisfied)
Part A
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-5 (Urban Areas)?
Part A Satisfied?
Part 1 Satisfied?
218 265 197 135
0 1 0
Vehicles
Both Approaches - Major Street
2 CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Vernon at Burt.xlsx
JN:0328-2023-04

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
Time Period
Approach Lanes 2-3
Vehicles
Both Approaches - Major Street 218
The plotted points fall above the curve
in Figure 4C-5 (Rural Areas)?
Part B
Hour 15
Part B Satisfied?
Pedestrians
Crossing the Major Street 0
CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants_Vernon at Burt.xlsx
JN:0328-2023-04

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Warrant 5 - School Crossing
(Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied)
Warrant Satisfied?
Part A Part A Satisfied?
Part B Satisfied?
Gap/Minutes and # of Children
Gaps VS Minutes Minutes Children Using Crossing
Number of Adequate Gaps
School Age Pedestrian Crossing Street / Hr
N/A
N/A
N/A

DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System
Minimum Requirements
≥ 1000 ft North: 2675 ft, South: 0 ft, East: 0 ft, West: 0 ft.

CONDITIONS
N

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona California MUTCD 2014 Edition
Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
MR Date: 9/12/2023
RK Date: 9/12/2023

1. Is the posted speed limit of 85th percentile speed on major road exceeds 40 mph? Y

2. N

3. Y
Volume Level Criteria:

Does the intersection lie within the built-area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000?
Checked by:

Number of Lanes:

Number of Lanes:
1 1
Engineer:

WEEKDAY
Burt Street/Field Maple Place
Jurisdiction:

Major Street:

City of San Jacinto
Vernon Avenue
Have adequate trials of other remedial measures been performed? Traffic Condition:

Minor Street:

Roadway
Classification
Rural
N
Entering Volumes - All Approaches
During Typical Weekday Peak Hour (319) Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday.

Fulfilled
Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets? N
OR
During Each of any 5Hrs. Of a Sat. or Sun (0) Veh/Hr?
N
N
1000 Veh/Hr
Major
Route B
N
Major
Route A
N

5.3.e
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Vernon Avenue Between Ramona Expressway and Cypress Avenue Traffic Review, dated September 13, 2023 (Ramona

San Jacinto City CouncilApril 2, 2024

San Jacinto City Council
April 2, 2024