LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Environmental Checklist
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Initial Study 73
8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the
environment? ■ □ □ □
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases? ■ □ □ □
Overview of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases
Climate change is the observed increase in the average temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans along with other substantial changes in climate (such as wind patterns, precipitation, and storms) over an extended period of time. Climate change is the result of numerous, cumulative sources of GHG emissions contributing to the “greenhouse effect,” a natural occurrence which takes place in Earth’s atmosphere and helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of radiation from the sun hits Earth’s surface and warms it. The surface, in turn, radiates heat back towards the atmosphere in the form of infrared radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from escaping into space and re-radiate it in all directions.
GHG emissions occur both naturally and as a result of human activities, such as fossil fuel burning, decomposition of landfill wastes, raising livestock, deforestation, and some agricultural practices.
GHGs produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. Different types of GHGs have varying global warming potentials (GWP). The GWP of a GHG is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere over a specified timescale (generally, 100 years). Because GHGs absorb different amounts of heat, a common reference gas (CO2) is used to relate the amount of heat absorbed to the amount of the gas emitted, referred to as “carbon dioxide equivalent” (CO2e), which is the amount of GHG emitted multiplied by its GWP. Carbon dioxide has a 100-year GWP of one. By contrast, methane has a GWP of 30, meaning its global warming effect is 30 times greater than CO2 on a molecule per molecule basis (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] 2022).3
The principal climate change gases resulting from human activity that enter and accumulate in the atmosphere are listed below:
3 The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (2022) Sixth Assessment Report determined that methane has a GWP of 30. However, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan published by the California Air Resources Board uses a GWP of 25 for methane, consistent with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (2007) Fourth Assessment Report. Therefore, this analysis utilizes a GWP of 25.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
74 Carbon Dioxide. CO2 enters the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), solid waste, trees and wood products, and chemical reactions (e.g., the manufacture of cement). CO2 is also removed from the atmosphere (or “sequestered”) when it is absorbed by plants as part of the biological carbon cycle.
Methane. CH4 is emitted during the production and transport of coal, natural gas, and oil. CH4 emissions also result from livestock and agricultural practices and the decay of organic waste in municipal solid waste landfills.
Nitrous Oxide. N2O is emitted during agricultural and industrial activities as well as during combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste.
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC). HFCs are one of several high global warming potential (GWP) gases that are not naturally occurring and are generated from industrial processes. HFC (refrigerant) emissions from vehicle air conditioning systems occur due to leakage, losses during recharging, or release from scrapping vehicles at end of their useful life. Perfluorocarbons (PFC). PFCs are another high GWP gas that are not naturally occurring and are generated in a variety of industrial processes.
Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6). SF6 is another high GWP gas that is not naturally occurring and is generated in a variety of industrial processes.
There are uncertainties as to exactly what the climate changes will be in various local areas of the earth. There are also uncertainties associated with the magnitude and timing of other consequences of a warmer planet: sea level rise, spread of certain diseases out of their usual geographic range, the effect on agricultural production, water supply, sustainability of ecosystems, increased strength and frequency of storms, extreme heat events, increased air pollution episodes, and the consequence of these effects on the economy.
Regulatory Setting
California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill 32, and Senate Bill 32, and Assembly Bill 1279)
The “California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006,” (Assembly Bill [AB] 32), outlines California’s major legislative initiative for reducing GHG emissions. AB 32 codifies the statewide goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and requires CARB to prepare a Scoping Plan that outlines the main state strategies for reducing GHG emissions to meet the 2020 deadline. In addition, AB 32 requires CARB to adopt regulations to require reporting and verification of statewide GHG emissions. Based on this guidance, CARB approved a 1990 statewide GHG level and 2020 target of 431 million metric tons (MMT) of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e), which was achieved in 2016.
CARB approved the Scoping Plan on December 11, 2008, which included GHG emission reduction strategies related to energy efficiency, water use, and recycling and solid waste, among others (CARB 2009). Many of the GHG reduction measures included in the Scoping Plan (e.g., Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Advanced Clean Car standards, and Cap-and-Trade) have been adopted since the Scoping Plan’s approval.
On September 8, 2016, the governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 32 into law, extending the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 by requiring the state to further reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (the other provisions of AB 32 remain unchanged). On December 14, 2017, the CARB adopted the 2017 Scoping Plan, which provides a framework for achieving the 2030 target. The 2017 Scoping Plan relies on the continuation and expansion of existing policies and regulations, such as the Cap-and-Trade Program, and implementation of Environmental Checklist
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Initial Study 75
recently adopted policies and legislation, such as SB 1383 and SB 100 (discussed later). The 2017 Scoping Plan also puts an increased emphasis on innovation, adoption of existing technology, and strategic investment to support its strategies. As with the 2013 Scoping Plan update, the 2017 Scoping Plan does not provide project-level thresholds for land use development. Instead, it recommends that local governments adopt policies and locally appropriate quantitative thresholds consistent with statewide per capita goals of six MT CO2e by 2030 and two MT CO2e by 2050 (CARB 2017). As stated in the 2017 Scoping Plan, these goals may be appropriate for plan-level analyses (city, county, sub-regional, or regional level), but not for specific individual projects because they include all emissions sectors in the state (CARB 2017).
AB 1279, “The California Climate Crisis Act,” was passed on September 16, 2022 and declares the State would achieve net zero GHG emissions as soon as possible, but no later than 2045, and to achieve and maintain net negative GHG emissions thereafter. In addition, the bill states that the State would reduce GHG emissions by 85 percent below 1990 levels no later than 2045. CARB’s 2022 Scoping Plan for achieving Carbon Neutrality lays out a path to achieve AB 1279 targets and SB 32 (CARB 2022). The actions and outcomes in the 2022 Scoping Plan would achieve significant reductions in fossil fuel combustion by deploying clean technologies and fuels, further reductions in short-lived climate pollutants, support for sustainable development, increased action on natural and working lands to reduce emissions and sequester carbon, and the capture and storage of carbon.
City of San Leandro 2035 General Plan
The City of San Leandro’s 2035 General Plan, adopted in September 2016, lists several GHGreduction goals, policies, and actions as part of the Transportation Element and Open Space, Parks, and Conservation Element that support the goal of reducing GHG emissions. The following goals and policies are applicable to the proposed project (City of San Leandro 2016):
Policy T-5.2 Evaluating Development Impacts. Use vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary metric for evaluating the transportation impacts of new development proposals.
Traffic impact studies may also consider the total number of trips generated and the resulting impact on traffic volumes and congestion (e.g., “Level of Service”), but VMT shall provide the primary basis for determining appropriate mitigation measures.
Goal OSC-7 Promote recycling, water conservation, green building, and other programs which reduce greenhouse gas emissions and create a more sustainable environment.
Policy OSC-7.8 Green Building. Promote green building in new construction and remodels.
Goal OSC-8 Promote the efficient use of energy and the increased use of renewable energy by San Leandro residents and businesses.
Policy OSC-8.1 Conservation and Energy Efficiency. Strongly advocate for increased energy conservation by San Leandro residents and businesses, and ensure that the City itself is a conservation role model.
Policy OSC-8.2 Planning and Building Practices. Encourage construction, landscaping, and site planning practices that minimize heating and cooling costs and ensure that energy is efficiently used. Local building codes and other City regulations and procedures should meet or exceed state and federal standards for energy conservation and efficiency, and support the City’s greenhouse gas reduction goals.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
76 San Leandro 2021 Climate Action Plan
The City of San Leandro updated and approved its Climate Action Plan (CAP) in July 2021, which outlines strategies for reducing GHG emissions through various activities, including but not limited to water conservation, energy conservation, land use design and orientation, transportationoriented development, and renewable energy source use. According to the CAP, “The CAP is prepared consistent with CEQA Guidelines for Plans for the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5). Additionally, the CAP meets the criteria from the BAAQMD CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Impacts from Land Use Projects and Plans, as described under Significance Thresholds. This allows the 2021 CAP to support and streamline environmental review of GHG emissions related to future development projects within the city.” Therefore, a project that would comply with the goals and policies of the City’s CAP would have less-than-significant GHG impacts
City of San Leandro Municipal Code
Section 3.24.400 of the San Leandro Municipal Code requires commercial business organic waste generators and multi-family dwelling units to participate in organic waste collection services. These uses must subscribe to collection services for compost containers, recycling containers, and landfill containers.
Section 7.5.600 of the San Leandro Municipal Code requires compliance with the California Green Building Code, Title 24, Part 11, which details requirements for energy conservation and green design. Section 7.5.700 of the San Leandro Municipal Code requires compliance with the California Energy Code, Title 24, Part 6, which details requirements for the use of energy-efficient design and technologies as well as provisions for incorporating renewable energy resources into building design.
Significance Thresholds
Individual projects do not generate sufficient GHG emissions to influence climate change directly.
However, physical changes caused by a project can contribute incrementally to significant cumulative effects, even if individual changes resulting from a project are limited. The issue of climate change typically involves an analysis of whether a project’s contribution towards an impact would be cumulatively considerable. “Cumulatively considerable” means the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when considered in conjunction with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064[h][1]).
According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b), projects can tier from a qualified GHG reduction plan, which allows for project-level evaluation of GHG emissions through the comparison of the project’s consistency with the GHG reduction policies included in a qualified GHG reduction plan.
This approach is considered by the Association of Environmental Professionals (2016) in its white paper, Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California, to be the most defensible approach presently available under CEQA to determine the significance of a project’s GHG emissions.
The 2022 BAAQMD CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Impacts From Land Use Projects and Plans guidance document contains two approaches for determining significance of GHGs (BAAQMD 2022). The two approaches are as follows:
Environmental Checklist
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Initial Study 77
1. Projects must include, at a minimum, the following project design elements:
Buildings
The project will not include natural gas appliances or natural gas plumbing (in both residential and nonresidential development).
The project will not result in any wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy usage as determined by the analysis required under CEQA Section 21100(b)(3) and Section 15126.2(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Transportation
Achieve a reduction in project-generated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) below the regional average consistent with the current version of the California Climate Change Scoping Plan (currently 15 percent) or meet a locally adopted Senate Bill 743 VMT target, reflecting the recommendations provided in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research’s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA:
Residential projects: 15 percent below the existing VMT per capita Office projects: 15 percent below the existing VMT per employee Retail projects: no net increase in existing VMT
Achieve compliance with off-street electric vehicle requirements in the most recently adopted version of CALGreen Tier
2. Projects must be consistent with a local GHG reduction strategy that meets the criteria under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b).
This analysis will evaluate the project in terms of consistency with the San Leandro 2021 Climate Action Plan, a local GHG reduction strategy that contains all of the components required under Criterion 2 above.
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The City of San Leandro has selected to use approach 1 specified by BAAQMD for determining the significance of GHG emissions. As stated above in Significance Thresholds, new buildings must not include natural gas. The proposed project would include natural gas. The proposed project would also generate vehicle trips, generating vehicle miles traveled. The vehicle miles traveled by project employee may not be at least 15 percent below existing average VMT in the area, thereby also potentially exceeding BAAQMD thresholds of significance. Accordingly, this impact would be potentially significant and will be evaluated in an EIR.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
78 This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Initial Study 79
9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials? □ □ ■ □
b. Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment? ■ □ □ □
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
0.25 mile of an existing or proposed
school? □ □ ■ □
d. Be located on a site that is included on a
list of hazardous material sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment? ■ □ □ □
e. For a project located in an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area? □ □ ■ □
f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? □ □ □ ■
g. Expose people or structures, either
directly or indirectly, to a significant risk
of loss, injury, or death involving wildland
fires? □ □ □ ■
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
80 Setting
The following resources were reviewed to determine if hazardous materials may be present at the project site:
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Online Cortese List of Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (DTSC 2023; California Environmental Protection Agency 2021a, 2021b) California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker (SWRCB 2023) List of solid waste disposal sites identified by Water Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit List of “active” CDO and CAO from the SWRCB
List of hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code, identified by DTSC.
A search of the above listed government databases and environmental records compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 revealed that the project site is a hazardous materials site.
Both the Envirostor and Geotracker Databases list the site due to former aerospace manufacturing and maintenance that occurred on site. The Geotracker database indicates the site is undergoing remediation while the Envirostor database classifies the site as a State Response Site which was certified for operation and maintenance in 2013 with land use restrictions. Land use restrictions at the project site are laid out in a Land Use Covenant prepared by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).
There are no schools within 0.25 mile of the project site, the closest school is Garfield Elementary School, approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the site.
Regulatory Setting
Department of Toxic Substances Control
As a department of CalEPA, the DTSC regulates hazardous waste, cleans up existing contamination, and looks for ways to reduce the hazardous waste produced in California. DTSC regulates hazardous waste in California primarily under the authority of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the California Health and Safety Code.
DTSC also administers the California Hazardous Waste Control Law (HWCL) to regulate hazardous wastes. While the HWCL is generally more stringent than RCRA, until the USEPA approves the California program, both state and federal laws apply in California. The HWCL lists 791 chemicals and approximately 300 common materials that may be hazardous; establishes criteria for identifying, packaging, and labeling hazardous wastes; prescribes management controls; establishes permit requirements for treatment, storage, disposal, and transportation; and identifies some wastes that cannot be disposed of in landfills.
Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the DTSC, the State Department of Health Services, SWRCB, and the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) compile and annually update lists of hazardous waste sites and land designated as hazardous waste sites throughout the state. The Secretary for Environmental Protection consolidates the information submitted by these agencies and distributes it to each city and county where sites on the lists are located. Before the lead agency accepts an application for any development project as complete, the applicant must consult these lists to determine if the site at issue is included.
Environmental Checklist
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Initial Study 81
If any soil is excavated from a site containing hazardous materials, it is considered a hazardous waste if it exceeds specific criteria in Title 22 of the CCR. Remediation of hazardous wastes found at a site may be required if excavation of these materials is performed, or if certain other soil disturbing activities would occur. Even if soil or groundwater at a contaminated site does not have the characteristics required to be defined as hazardous waste, remediation of the site may be required by regulatory agencies subject to jurisdictional authority. Cleanup requirements are determined on a case-by-case basis by the agency taking jurisdiction.
Regional Water Quality Control Board
The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulates discharges and releases to surface and groundwater in the project area. The RWQCB generally oversees cases involving groundwater contamination. The County of Alameda Department of Environmental Health handles most leaking underground storage tank cases, so the RWQCB may oversee cases involving other groundwater contaminants, i.e., Spills, Leaks, Incidents, and Clean-up cases. In the case of spills at a project site, the responsible party would notify the County of Alameda, RWQCB, or DTSC and a lead would be determined.
RWQCB has established guidelines used to evaluate the potential risk associated with chemicals found in soil or groundwater where a release of hazardous materials has occurred called Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). ESLs were developed to expedite the identification and evaluation of potential environmental concerns at contaminated sites. ESLs address soil, groundwater, soil gas, and indoor air and cover a range of concerns (e.g., impacts to drinking water, aquatic habitat, and vapor intrusion).
San Leandro Environmental Services Section
The City of San Leandro Environmental Services Section is designated as the City’s Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), which is overseen by the California Environmental Protection Agency and coordinates the regulation of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes in the City. CUPA ensures the consistent application of statewide standards during administrative, permitting, inspection, and enforcement activities associated with hazardous materials and hazardous wastes. If a business operated at the project site would use and store hazardous materials and generate hazardous wastes, CUPA would require the electronic submittal of chemical and facility information, a Hazardous Materials Business Plan, and hazardous waste generator permits to the California Environmental Reporting System online database. If operations at the project site would include the treatment, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous waste, the City Environmental Services Section would regulate these activities under a tiered permitting system.
CUPA, through the Hazardous Materials Office, regulates USTs containing hazardous materials, including installation, operation and maintenance, temporary closure, and removal and disposal of USTs. Additionally, CUPA holds the responsibility and authority to implement the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act, which regulates aboveground petroleum storage tanks through administrative requirements, permitting, inspections, and enforcement. Any aboveground or underground storage tanks present at the project site would be managed by the City Environmental Services Section.
The Hazardous Materials Office administers the California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program, which aims to reduce the likelihood and impact of accidental releases of regulated toxic and flammable substances through administrative and operational procedures, and facility City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
82 inspections. If the facility located on the project site would be regulated under the CalARP Program, the facility would file a written Risk Management Plan with the City Environmental Services Section.
San Leandro 2035 General Plan
The following Environmental Hazards Element policies of the San Leandro 2035 General Plan reduce potential hazards related to hazardous materials.
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT
Goal EH-5 Protect local residents and workers from the risks associated with hazardous materials.
Policy EH-5.1 Regulatory Compliance. Work with the appropriate county, regional, state, and federal agencies to develop and implement programs for hazardous waste reduction, hazardous material facility siting, hazardous waste handling and disposal, public education, and regulatory compliance.
Policy EH-5.2 Clean-Up of Contaminated Sites. Ensure that the necessary steps are taken to clean up residual hazardous wastes on any contaminated sites proposed for redevelopment or reuse. Require soil evaluations as needed to ensure that risks are assessed and appropriate remediation is provided.
Policy EH-5.4 Separation from Sensitive Uses. Provide adequate and safe separation between areas where hazardous materials are present and sensitive uses such as schools, residences, and public facilities. Zoning and other development regulations should include performance standards to avoid safety hazards and achieve compatibility between uses.
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Project construction would be a one-time event not requiring routine activities. While the project is in the General Industrial zoning district and industrial tenants are possible, the proposed project is a new warehouse. Warehouses do not have the facilities for manufacturing or refinement of hazardous materials, such as a chemical factory or oil refinery. Commercial warehouse structures typically do not routinely use or store large quantities of hazardous materials other than those typically used for office cleaning, maintenance, and landscaping. The proposed project does not include the construction of underground or above-ground storage tanks, like those typically used to store fuel or other hazardous substances. If the operation of the proposed project would require routine handling of hazardous materials, the use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials would be regulated through the RCRA which is implemented by DTSC. Transport of hazardous materials, during the operation of the proposed project, would be required to be transported under U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) regulations (USDOT Hazardous Materials Transport Act, 49 Code of Federal Regulations), which stipulate the types of containers, labeling, and other restrictions to be used in the movement of such material on interstate highways. In the case of spills at a project site, the responsible party would notify the County of Alameda, RWQCB, or DTSC and a lead would be determined. Therefore, project operation would not involve the use, storage, Environmental Checklist
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Initial Study 83
transportation, or disposal of substantial quantities of hazardous materials and would not result in the release of such materials into the environment. Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
d. Would the project be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Project construction would include the temporary transport, storage, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials including fuels, lubricating fluids, cleaners, and solvents. If spilled, these substances could pose a risk to the environment and to human health. However, the transport, storage, use, or disposal of hazardous materials is subject to various federal, state, and local regulations designed to reduce risks associated with hazardous materials, including potential risks associated with upset or accident conditions. Hazardous materials would be required to be transported under U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) regulations (USDOT Hazardous Materials Transport Act, 49 Code of Federal Regulations), which stipulate the types of containers, labeling, and other restrictions to be used in the movement of such material on interstate highways.
In addition, the use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials are regulated through the RCRA.
DTSC is responsible for implementing the RCRA program, as well as California’s own hazardous waste laws. DTSC regulates hazardous waste, cleans up existing contamination, and looks for ways to control and reduce the hazardous waste produced in California. It does this primarily under the authority of RCRA and in accordance with the HWCL (California H&SC Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and the Hazardous Waste Control Regulations (Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Divisions 4 and
4.5). DTSC also oversees permitting, inspection, compliance, and corrective action programs to ensure that hazardous waste managers follow federal and state requirements and other laws that affect hazardous waste specific to handling, storage, transportation, disposal, treatment, reduction, cleanup, and emergency planning. Project construction would disturb more than one acre of land.
Accordingly, the project applicant must develop and implement a SWPPP, pursuant to state regulations. The SWPPP must contain measures that are implemented at the site to prevent soil erosion and soil loss. The SWPPP must also contain measures to implement in the event of a leak or spill of construction fluids, such as equipment diesel fuel. Compliance with existing regulations would reduce the risk of potential release of hazardous materials used during construction.
Asbestos is a naturally occurring fibrous material that was extensively used as a fireproofing and insulating agent in building construction materials before such uses were banned by the USEPA in the 1970s. Asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were commonly used for insulation of heating ducts as well as ceiling and floor tiles. Undisturbed ACMs contained within building materials present no significant health risk because there is no exposure pathway. However, once these tiny fibers are disturbed, they can become airborne and become a respiratory hazard. The proposed project would involve the demolition of existing vacant structures on the project site. Project demolition activities would have potential to expose construction workers to asbestos containing materials. Additionally, construction workers could also be exposed to lead-based paint during demolition of existing structures. Lead is hazardous to human health.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
84 As described in Setting, above, the project site is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The Geotracker database indicates the site is undergoing remediation while the Envirostor database classifies the site as a State Response Site which was certified for operation and maintenance in 2013 with land use restrictions. The proposed construction of an industrial building and parking on site complies with the restricted uses allowed on the project site. However, the land use covenant requires a soil management plan for excavations exceeding certain depths. This suggests there is potential for either contaminated soil or groundwater, or both, to be encountered during project construction. If construction workers are exposed to contaminated materials during construction or if these materials are released into the environment, impacts would be potentially significant. Likewise, exposure to lead-based paint or asbestos would also be a potentially significant impact. Accordingly, this impact will be further evaluated in the EIR.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school? There are no schools within 0.25 mile of the project site, the closest school is Garfield Elementary School, approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the site. Though potentially hazardous materials, substances, and waste such as fuels, lubricants, solvents, and oils could be used during project construction, the transport, use and storage of hazardous materials would be required to be conducted in accordance with all applicable State and federal laws, such as the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, RCRA, the California Hazardous Material Management Act, and the CCR, Title
22. The project would have a less than significant impact on hazardous materials, substances, or waste emissions within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The project site is approximately 2.5 miles east of Oakland International Airport and 6.6 miles north of the Hayward Executive Airport. The project site is within the Oakland Airport Influence Area but is not within a noise or safety compatibility zone of the Oakland Airport. The project site is located primarily in the Outer Approach Zone (Zone 4), where warehouses and distribution facilities are a compatible use assuming employment does not exceed 100 employees per acre (Alameda County Community Development Agency 2010; Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission 2010).
Additionally, the project applicant submitted the project to the FAA, who determined that a proposed building height of 50 feet does not present a hazard to air navigation. Therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people working in the project area as a result of airport operations. Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Project construction would not require the closure of nearby roads and would not result in the need for detours. Construction activities would be limited to the project site and equipment and vehicles Environmental Checklist
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Initial Study 85
would be stationed within the site. The proposed project would not obstruct existing roadways or require the construction of new roadways. The project would modify Hester Street with driveways; however, the driveways would be at the end of Hester Street, avoiding the need to close Hester Street to through traffic. Therefore, the proposed project would not block emergency response or evacuation routes or interfere with adopted emergency response and emergency evacuation plans.
No impact would occur.
NO IMPACT
g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
The project site is in a developed, urbanized area surrounded by commercial development and roadways. No wildlands or densely vegetated areas are located nearby that would represent a significant fire hazard. The project does not fall within a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone for wildland fires; the nearest Fire Hazard Severity Zone is approximately 3 miles west of the project site (CALFIRE 2023). As discussed further in Section 20, Wildfire, the project would not expose people or structures to significant hazards related to wildland fires and there would be no impact.
NO IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
86 This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Hydrology and Water Quality
Initial Study 87
10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface
or ground water quality? □ □ ■ □
b. Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin? □ □ ■ □
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
(i) Result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site; □ □ ■ □
(ii) Substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site; □ □ ■ □
(iii) Create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or □ □ ■ □
(iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? □ □ ■ □
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation? □ □ ■ □
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management
plan? □ □ ■ □
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
88 Setting
The City of San Leandro overlies the Santa Clara Valley (East Bay Plain) Groundwater Subbasin, which is bounded by San Pablo Bay to the north, the Diablo Range to the east, the San Francisco Bay to the west, and a groundwater divide near the City of Hayward to the south (California’s Groundwater 2004).
The project site is approximately 14.14 acres and generally flat. The proposed project would include the construction of bioswales, new stormwater inlets, and a new stormwater drain which would connect to an existing storm drain main that exists beneath the surface of the existing site driveway from Doolittle Drive.
The project site is approximately 2.5 miles east of the San Francisco Bay, 5.8 miles northwest of San Lorenzo Creek, and 2.5 miles west of San Leandro Creek. Both creeks flow to the west and terminate in the San Francisco Bay. The City of San Leandro receives approximately 21 inches of rain annually, with rainfall concentrated in the winter months (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2022).
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) produces Flood Insurance Rate Maps that delineate special flood hazard zones, generally referred to as the 100-year floodplain. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map that covers the project area (Map Panel #06001C0252H), the project site is not within 100-year floodplain (Federal Emergency Management Agency 2018). The eastern most area of the project site is mapped as an area of minimal flood hazard and having a less than
0.2 percent annual chance to be inundated by flood waters as a result of a storm event, also known as the 500-year flood event. Additionally, the project site is located approximately 2.5 miles east of the San Francisco Bay and is within a tsunami zone, as shown in the Alameda County Tsunami Hazard Areas (California Department of Conservation 2021). Accordingly, though unlikely, the project site could be inundated, especially when compounded with expected sea-level rise into the future.
Regulatory Setting
Clean Water Act
Congress enacted the CWA, formerly the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, with the intent of restoring and maintaining the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the U.S. The CWA requires states to set standards to protect, maintain, and restore water quality through the regulation of point source and non-point source discharges to surface water. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit process regulates those discharges (CWA Section 402). NPDES permitting authority is administered by the SWRCB and its nine RWQCBs.
The project site is in a watershed administered by the San Francisco Bay RWQCB (San Francisco Bay RWQCB 2022).
California Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act
The Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1967 requires the SWRCB and the nine RWQCBs to adopt water quality criteria to protect State waters. These criteria include the identification of beneficial uses, narrative and numerical water quality standards, and implementation procedures.
The criteria for state waters in the region are contained in the Water Quality Objectives Chapter of the Basin Plan for the San Francisco Bay RWQCB (San Francisco Bay RWQCB 2017). The Water Quality Control Plan, or Basin Plan, protects designated beneficial uses of State waters through the Environmental Checklist
Hydrology and Water Quality
Initial Study 89
issuance of Waste Discharge Requirements and through the development of total maximum daily loads. Anyone proposing to discharge waste that could affect the quality of the waters of the State must make a report of the waste discharge to the RWQCB or SWRCB, as appropriate, in compliance with Porter-Cologne.
Alameda County Clean Water Program
The City of San Leandro is a member agency of the Alameda County Clean Water Program (ACCWP), which was established in response to federal stormwater NPDES regulations. Pursuant to the ACCWP Stormwater C.3 Technical Guidance (ACCWP 2017), projects that create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface must comply with Provision C.3, which requires incorporation of appropriate source control, site design, and stormwater treatment measures in new development and redevelopment projects to address stormwater runoff pollutant discharges and prevent increases in runoff flows. The proposed project would be subject to this provision and would be required to implement appropriate measures.
Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.3
The San Francisco Bay RWQCB re-issued the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP) in 2015 to regulate stormwater discharges from municipalities and local agencies (co-permittees) in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties. Under Provision C.3 of the MRP, new and redevelopment projects that create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area are required to implement site design, source control, and Low Impact Development (LID)-based stormwater treatment controls to treat post-construction stormwater runoff. LID-based treatment controls are intended to maintain or restore the site’s natural hydrologic functions, maximizing opportunities for infiltration and evapotranspiration, and using stormwater as a resource (e.g., rainwater harvesting for non-potable uses). The MRP also requires that stormwater treatment measures are properly installed, operated, and maintained. In addition, the City would require a Stormwater Treatment Measures and Hydromodifications Management Controls Maintenance Agreement.
In addition to water quality controls, the MRP requires new development and redevelopment projects that create or replace one acre or more of impervious surface to manage developmentrelated increases in peak runoff flow, volume, and duration, where such hydromodification is likely to cause increased erosion, silt pollutant generation, or other impacts to local rivers, streams, and creeks. Projects may be deemed exempt from these requirements if they do not meet the minimized size threshold, drain into tidally influenced areas or directly into the Bay, or drain into hardened channels, or if they are infill projects in subwatersheds or catchment areas that are greater than or equal to 65 percent impervious.
The project would be required to comply with all requirements in the MRP. This permit was reissued the Regional Water Quality Control Board in May 2022.
City of San Leandro Municipal Code
Chapter 3-15 of San Leandro Municipal Code regulates discharges into the City’s stormwater system. Chapter 3-15 requires implementation of stormwater and erosion best management practices and compliance with the CWA and NPDES permits to eliminate non-stormwater discharges to the municipal separate storm sewer. Further, Chapter 7-12 of San Leandro Municipal Code requires development projects to submit erosion and sedimentation control plans and drainage plans to the City for approval prior to project construction.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
90 City of San Leandro 2035 General Plan
The following policies are applicable to the proposed project:
OSC-7.2 Water Conservation. Promote the efficient use of existing water supplies through a variety of water conservation measures, including the use of recycled water for landscaping.
OSC-7.3 Drought Tolerant Landscaping. Encourage the use of native vegetation and Bay-friendly landscaping and enforce the State Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
CONSTRUCTION
During grading activities, the soils on the project site would be exposed to wind and water erosion that could transport sediments into local stormwater drainages. Also, accidental spills of fluids or fuels from construction vehicles and equipment, or miscellaneous construction materials and debris, could be mobilized and transported off-site in overland flow. These contaminant sources could degrade the water quality of receiving water bodies (e.g., San Francisco Bay), potentially resulting in a violation of water quality standards.
As part of Section 402 of the CWA, the USEPA has established regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control both construction and operation (occupancy) stormwater discharges. The federal CWA was first adopted in 1972 and is intended to protect and preserve water supply and quality in the “waters of the nation.” In the Bay Area, the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) administers the NPDES permitting program and is responsible for developing permitting requirements. The proposed project would be subject to the San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (MRP) – NPDES Permit Order No. R2-2015-0049, and the provisions set forth in Section C.3 New Development and Redevelopment. Under the conditions of the permitting program, the applicant would be required to eliminate or reduce non-stormwater discharges to waters of the nation, develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction activities, and perform inspections of the stormwater pollution prevention measures and control practices to ensure conformance with the site SWPPP. Because the proposed project would disturb at least one acre of land, the project must provide stormwater treatment and would be required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or 2009- 0009-DWQ General Permit).
Environmental Checklist
Hydrology and Water Quality
Initial Study 91
Further, in accordance with San Leandro Municipal Code Chapter 7-12 (Grading, Excavations and Fill), all grading activities must be conducted in a manner that will minimize the potential for erosion from the site. If requested by the City engineer, the project applicant would be required to staff the project site during storms to prevent erosion and sedimentation of project soils (Section 7-12-305).
In accordance with Section 7-12-600 of the San Leandro Municipal Code, construction erosion and sedimentation control facilities must be completely in place during the wet season in San Leandro (October 15th through April 15th). In accordance with Section 3-15-215 of the San Leandro Municipal Code, construction contractors performing work in the City shall endeavor, whenever possible, to provide filter materials at the catch basin to retain any debris and dirt flowing into the City’s storm sewer system. Therefore, with compliance with construction-related water quality and erosion control requirements, construction of the proposed project would not violate water quality standards. Impacts resulting from project construction would be less than significant.
OPERATION
Currently the project site is developed with impervious surfaces that do not allow precipitation to infiltrate the ground surface, such as the existing industrial buildings and asphalt parking lots.
Runoff from these impervious surfaces can carry a variety of pollutants, including oil and grease, metals, sediment, and pesticide residues from roadways, parking lots, and rooftops for when the site was active, and depositing them into adjacent or nearby waterways via the storm drain system.
Following construction, the proposed warehouse and associated surface parking and internal access roads would be impervious. Consistent with existing conditions, precipitation falling onto these impervious surfaces would become runoff and potentially mobilize urban pollutants, such as oil and grease from the proposed parking areas on-site. However, compared to existing conditions, the project would reduce the amount of impervious surfaces on-site through the construction of approximately 18,000 square feet of landscaped areas, which would function as vegetated bioretention areas for stormwater runoff. Vegetated bio-filtration systems are designed to slow down velocity, reduce volume, and retain pollutants of stormwater runoff using a combination of plants and filter media such as sand, gravel, compost, and soil (Guo 2009; Lim et al. 2015). They enhance natural processes such as sedimentation, filtration, sorption, plant and microbial uptake, and biodegradation (EPA 1999). Accordingly, the proposed project would potentially improve water quality during operation, as on-site filtration would be provided.
Stormwater runoff that does not infiltrate the ground surface in the proposed bioretention areas would discharge from the bioretention areas into the City’s existing storm drain system. Stormwater discharge during operation is regulated by the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit, issued by the RWQCB, pursuant to NPDES regulations. Water quality in stormwater runoff is regulated locally by the Alameda County Clean Water Program, which includes the C.3 provisions set by the San Francisco Bay RWQCB. Provision C.3 of the MRP addresses post-construction stormwater requirements for new development and redevelopment projects that add and/or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious area. Because the proposed project would replace in excess of 10,000 square feet of the impervious surface of the project site, it must comply with the C.3 provisions set by the RWQCB (also a requirement pursuant to San Leandro Municipal Code Chapter 3-15). Therefore, the proposed project must meet certain criteria including: 1) incorporate site design, source control, and stormwater treatment measures into the project design; 2) minimize the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff and non-stormwater discharge; and 3) minimize increases in runoff flows as compared to pre-development conditions. A Stormwater Control Plan (SCP) that details the site control, source control, and stormwater measures that would be implemented at the site must be submitted to the City. In addition, Low Impact Development (LID) City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
92 requirements apply. In accordance with the C.3 requirements, the project is designed to direct runoff from the warehouse building roof, sidewalks, and surface parking areas into on-site landscaped bioretention areas to treat runoff before entering the stormwater system.
Given required compliance to the provisions of NPDES Section C.3, the SWPPP, and the stormwater control plan, the proposed project would not result in adverse effects on water quality and or in the violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during construction or operation. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on water quality. With implementation of the measures contained in these plans, excessive stormwater runoff, substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site would not occur and the potential for the project to violate water quality standards and substantially degrade water quality would be reduced.
The proposed project would connect to the City of San Leandro’s sanitary sewer system, which conveys wastewater to the City’s Water Pollution Control Plant. Effluent, which refers to wastewater that has undergone treatment at the Water Pollution Control Plant, is discharged into the San Francisco Bay under a permit with the RWQCB. Since the Water Pollution Control Plant is considered a publicly owned treatment facility, operational discharge flows treated at the Water Pollution Control Plant must comply with applicable water discharge requirements issued by the RWQCB. Compliance with conditions or permit requirements established by the City as well as water discharge requirements outlined by the RWQCB would ensure that wastewater discharges coming from the project site and treated by the Water Pollution Control Plant system would not exceed applicable RWQCB wastewater treatment requirements. Mandatory compliance with the permit requirements would prevent stormwater runoff and effluent discharges from violating water quality standards or substantially degrading water quality. Thus, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan.
Compared to existing conditions, the proposed project would increase the potential for groundwater recharge. Potential groundwater recharge would increase due to the bioretention areas that would be constructed on-site to allow for the infiltration of precipitation and stormwater runoff. Additionally, the proposed project does not include use of groundwater supplies, as the City of San Leandro receives its water from the East Bay Municipal Utility District. The East Bay Municipal Utility District acquires it water from a variety of surface sources, with the primary source being a series of reservoirs in the Mokelumne River watershed (East Bay Municipal Utility District 2021).
Although there is no adopted sustainable groundwater management plan for the groundwater basin underlying the project site, because the proposed project would allow for infiltration and not use groundwater, it would not conflict with such a plan. Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
c.(i) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
c.(ii) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Environmental Checklist
Hydrology and Water Quality
Initial Study 93
c.(iii) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
c.(iv) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows? The proposed project would not alter the course of a stream or river. Rivers and streams, as well as other wetlands, do not occur on or adjacent to the project site or on Hester Street, which comprise the entire area where project construction would occur.
The proposed project would alter the existing drainage pattern of the site. However, the alterations would increase infiltration of precipitation and stormwater runoff through the addition of pervious landscaping that function as bioretention areas. The bioretention areas would be vegetated to prevent erosion of mobilization of soil within the bioretention areas. Other areas of the project site would be impervious surfaces, such as the proposed warehouse and parking areas, where soils are covered and not subject to erosion. Vegetated bioretention systems, like those included in the proposed project, are designed to slow down the velocity and reduce the volume of stormwater runoff using a combination of plants and filter media such as sand, gravel, compost, and soil (Guo 2009; Lim et al. 2015). Additionally, the project would be required to incorporate stormwater control measures and NPDES permit requirements to reduce the amount of runoff that would enter the storm drain system compared to existing conditions. Accordingly, the proposed project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. Vegetated bioretention areas also filter stormwater to reduce the concentration of pollutants mobilized in runoff, thereby reducing pollution in runoff that is discharged into receiving waters via the City’s storm drain system. Compared with existing conditions, the bioretention areas would increase flood storage on the project site, which currently provides no areas to capture stormwater flows. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
The project is subject to inundation from a 500-year flood event, as well as a tsunami. The proposed project is a new warehouse. Warehouses do not have the facilities for manufacturing or refinement of hazardous materials, such as a chemical factory or oil refinery, which would pose a substantial risk of release of pollutants if inundated. Commercial warehouse structures typically do not routinely use or store large quantities of hazardous materials and pollutants other than those typically used for office cleaning, maintenance, and landscaping. The proposed project does not include the construction of storage tanks, like those typically used to store fuel or other hazardous substances, which would be damaged and leak during periods of inundation. Wastewater from the project would immediately be conveyed to the City’s existing sanitary sewer system. Therefore, potential inundation of the project would not result in substantial release of pollutants into the environment. Additionally, existing conditions on the site are subject to inundation, and thus the project would not substantially alter existing conditions. Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
94 This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Land Use and Planning
Initial Study 95
11 Land Use and Planning
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established
community? □ □ □ ■
b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect? □ □ ■ □
Setting
As stated in the Project Description, the project site has a General Plan land use designation of General Industrial and is zoned as General Industrial (IG). According to the Land Use Element of the 2035 General Plan, areas designated as General Industrial may contain a wide range of manufacturing, transportation, food and beverage processing, technology, warehousing, vehicle storage, office-flex, and distribution uses. A limited range of commercial uses also is permitted in these areas (City of San Leandro 2016). IG zones include but are not limited to commercial and industrial land uses. For example, automobile parts sales, business and trade schools, food processing, laboratories, big-box retail sales, and warehouses are allowable in the IG zoning district.
Pursuant to Chapter 2.12 of the San Leandro Municipal Code, allowable intensity on the project site is up to 1 FAR, and maximum building height is 35 feet, but up to 50 feet with City approval.
The project site is within the planning area of the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Oakland Internation Airport (Alameda County Community Development Department 2010). The project site is located primarily in the Outer Approach Zone (Zone 4), where warehouses and distribution facilities are compatible uses. Warehouses and distribution facilities are compatible uses when there will be at most 100 employees per acre and that at least 20 percent of the parcel will be vacant land, including parking areas (Alameda County Community Development Department 2010).
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project physically divide an established community? The project would involve redevelopment of an existing site. No new roads, linear infrastructure, or other development features are proposed that would divide an established community or limit movement, travel, or social interaction between established land uses. Project construction would not physically divide an established community. There would be no impact related to physically dividing established communities.
NO IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
96 b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
SAN LEANDRO 2035 GENERAL PLAN
The project site has a General Plan land use designation of General Industrial. Warehouses are among the uses envisioned for the General Industrial designation; the project would therefore be consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site.
The City’s General Plan contains several land use policies with the purpose of avoiding or mitigating environmental impacts. Table 14 shows applicable General Plan land use policies that aim to avoid or mitigate environmental impacts and the project’s consistency with those policies.
Table 14 Project Consistency with San Leandro 2035 General Plan Land Use Policies General Plan Policy Project Consistency
Policy LU 1.14. Construction Impacts. Ensure
that construction activities are regulated and
monitored in a manner that minimizes the
potential for adverse off-site impacts such as
noise, dust, erosion, exposure to hazardous
materials, and truck traffic.
Consistent. The project would comply with existing applicable regulations that would minimize impacts to noise, dust, erosion, and exposure to hazardous materials. As discussed in Section 3, Air Quality, project construction would not exceed applicable thresholds for particulate matter and would not result in a significant impact related to dust or air quality. As discussed in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the project would be required to comply with Section 3-15 and Section 7-12 of the San Leandro Municipal Code, which outline construction erosion and stormwater best management practices and require the preparation of an erosion and sedimentation control plan during construction. As concluded therein, the project would not result in substantial erosion or runoff. As discussed in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the project would not result in the release of hazardous materials to the environment and would not expose project occupants to substantial hazards and hazardous materials, including during construction. As discussed in Section 13, Noise, construction noise would not result in substantial adverse effects on the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with this General Plan policy.
Policy LU-10.2. Off-Site Impacts. Consider the
setting and context of each site evaluating
proposals for development in industrial areas.
The potential for impacts on adjacent uses,
including the potential for land use conflicts
and increased parking demand and truck
traffic, should be a key consideration.
Consistent. The project would involve development of a 239,573 square-foot warehouse, which would be consistent with surrounding land uses, including commercial and industrial land uses to the north such as tool vendors, screen printing shops, machine shops, and sign shops; commercial and industrial land uses to the east such as several trucking businesses, a landscape company, metal supplier, and other commercial/industrial businesses that operate adjacent to the eastern project site boundary; an existing un-used railroad track and commercial and industrial development to the south; and more commercial and industrial land uses to the west. The proposed project would not include rezoning and therefore would be consistent with the City’s IG zoning district, and would not result in a land use conflict.
The proposed project would include two main surface parking areas:
one area on the west side of the building closer to the proposed office uses, and one area on the north side of the warehouse. The area on the west side of the building would include 204 parking spaces for passenger vehicles, and the area north of the warehouse would include 59 parking spaces for tractor trailers. This exceeds the 160 parking spaces required by City parking standards pursuant to San Leandro Municipal Code Section 4.08.108(D).
Environmental Checklist
Land Use and Planning
Initial Study 97
Additionally, the project site already contains a warehouse. The proposed warehouse would be consistent with past on-site uses, though these uses are no longer operational. Therefore, the proposed project would not have substantial new off-site impacts. The proposed project is consistent with this General Plan policy.
Source: City of San Leandro 2016a
As shown in Table 14, the project would be generally consistent with applicable City’s General Plan policies that aim to avoid or mitigate environmental effects.
San Leandro Municipal Code
The project site is in the IG zoning district. A variety of commercial and industrial land uses are permitted by right in the IG zone, including warehouses; the project would therefore be consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site.
The San Leandro Municipal Code contains several regulations that intend to avoid or mitigate environmental impacts in San Leandro. Table 15 shows policies that aim to avoid or mitigate environmental effects and the project’s consistency with those regulations.
Table 15 Project Consistency with the San Leandro Municipal Code San Leandro Municipal Code Project Consistency
Section 7-5-600. Section 7-5-600 adopts the California
Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) as the
Green Building Code of San Leandro.
Consistent. As described in Section 6, Energy, the project would be required to implement the California Green Building Standards Code.
Chapter 5-2. Chapter 5-2 establishes that street trees
in San Leandro are property of the City, and outlines
requirements for removal and planting of street trees.
Consistent. As described in the Project Description,
construction activities associated with the proposed project would require the removal of up to five street trees. These trees are not protected under the City’s tree ordinance.
Additionally, the project would involve replacing the trees with trees that are native species to California. Therefore, the project would not conflict with this chapter of the San Leandro Municipal Code.
Chapter 3-15. Chapter 3-15 contains standards and
requirements for development projects to avoid nonstormwater discharges into the municipal separate storm sewer.
Chapter 7-12. Chapter 7-12 contains standards and
permit requirements for grading and excavation, and
requires preparation of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan and drainage plan in order to reduce
water quality impacts of stormwater runoff from the
site for the life of the project.
Consistent. As described in the Project Description and Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the project would be required to comply with NPDES permit requirements, C.3 Stormwater Guidelines, and would involve the construction of bioswales throughout the site, generally within surface parking areas, but also adjacent to the proposed warehouse and internal access roads. Bioswales would be designed to capture and slow/pool runoff from impervious surface. As runoff collects in the bioswales, infiltration into the underlying ground would occur, reducing the volume of runoff that
continues toward discharge into the storm drain system.
Slowing the velocity of runoff by directing it into bioswales also allows sediment and other solids and suspended
pollutants to settle out before the runoff is discharged into the storm drain system. After entering on-site bioswales, treated runoff that does infiltrate the ground would enter new storm drain inlets installed in each bioswale. The inlets would connect to a new storm drain pipeline connected
beneath new surface parking areas and internal access roads.
The new storm drain pipeline would connect to an existing City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
98 storm drain main that exists beneath the surface of the existing site driveway from Doolittle Drive.
The project would also be required to comply with grading and excavation regulations established by the City and obtain appropriate permits prior to project approval. The project would be consistent with these chapters of the San Leandro Municipal Code.
Chapter 3-22. Chapter 3-22 outlines Bay-friendly
landscaping requirements for projects in San Leandro,
which consists of native, low-water use vegetation.
Consistent. As described in the Project Description, the project would include the planting of conifers and deciduous species which are categorized as low-water use vegetation. In addition, the proposed project would be required to meet the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and
include water efficient landscaping for plantings throughout the project site.
Source: San Leandro Municipal Code 2022
As shown in Table 15, the project would be consistent with the San Leandro Municipal Code and applicable building codes that intend to avoid or mitigate environmental impacts. Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Environmental Checklist
Mineral Resources
Initial Study 99
12 Mineral Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state? □ □ □ ■
b. Result in the loss of availability of a
locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land
use plan? □ □ □ ■
Setting
According to mapping completed by the State of California for suitability of use as construction materials, it was determined that no minerals or aggregate resources of statewide importance are located within San Leandro (California Department of Conservation 1996). In addition, there are no natural gas, oil, or geothermal resources identified in or adjacent to San Leandro.
Regulatory Setting
Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975
Pursuant to the mandate of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975, the State Mining and Geology Board requires all cities to incorporate into their general plans mapped mineral resources designations approved by the State Mining and Geology Board.
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? The project site and surrounding properties are part of an urbanized area with no current oil or gas extraction. San Leandro’s 2035 General Plan does not identify mineral deposits of regional significance within the city (City of San Leandro 2016a). No mineral resource activities would be altered or displaced by the proposed project. There would be no impact.
NO IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
100
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Noise
Initial Study 101
13 Noise
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project result in:
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies? ■ □ □ □
b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels? ■ □ □ □
c. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive
noise levels? ■ □ □ □
Noise Fundamentals
The unit of measurement used to describe a noise level is the decibel (dB). However, the human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies within the sound spectrum. Therefore, a method called “Aweighting” is used to filter noise frequencies that are not audible to the human ear. A-weighting approximates the frequency response of the average young ear when listening to most ordinary everyday sounds. When people make relative judgments of the loudness or annoyance of a sound, their judgments correlate well with the “A-weighted” levels of those sounds. Therefore, the Aweighted noise scale is used for measurements and standards involving the human perception of noise. In this analysis, all noise levels are A-weighted, and the abbreviation “dBA” is understood to identify the A weighted decibel.
Decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale that quantifies sound intensity in a manner similar to the Richter scale used for earthquake magnitudes. A 10 dB increase represents a 10-fold increase in sound intensity, a 20 dB increase is a 100-fold intensity increase, a 30 dB increase is a 1,000-fold intensity increase, etc. Similarly, a doubling of a noise source, such as doubling of traffic volume, would increase the noise level by 3 dB; a halving of the noise source would result in a 3 dB decrease.
Human perception of noise has no simple correlation with acoustical energy. The perception of noise is not linear in terms of dBA or in terms of acoustical energy. Two equivalent noise sources combined do not sound twice as loud as one source. It is widely accepted that the average healthy ear can barely perceive changes of 3 dBA (increase or decrease); that a change of 5 dBA is readily City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
102
perceptible; and that an increase or decrease of 10 dBA sounds twice (half) as loud (California Department of Transportation 2013).
Descriptors
The impact of noise is not a function of loudness alone. The time of day when noise occurs and the duration of the noise are also important. In addition, most noise that lasts for more than a few seconds is variable in its intensity. Consequently, a variety of noise descriptors has been developed.
The noise descriptors used for this analysis are the one-hour equivalent noise level (Leq) and the community noise equivalent level (CNEL).
The Leq is the level of a steady sound that, in a specific time period and at a specific location, has the same A-weighted sound energy as the time-varying sound. For example, Leq(1h) is the equivalent noise level over a 1-hour period and Leq(8h) is the equivalent noise level over an 8-hour period. Leq(1h) is a common metric for limiting nuisance noise, whereas Leq(8h) is a common metric for evaluating construction noise.
The CNEL is a 24-hour equivalent sound level. The CNEL calculation applies an additional 5 dBA penalty to noise occurring during evening hours (between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m.) and an additional 10 dBA penalty to noise occurring during the night (between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.).
These increases for certain times are intended to account for the added sensitivity of humans to noise during the evening and night.
Propagation
Sound from a small, localized source (approximating a “point” source) radiates uniformly outward as it travels away from the source in a spherical pattern, known as geometric spreading. The sound level decreases or drops off at a rate of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance.
Traffic noise is not a single, stationary point source of sound. Over some time interval, the movement of vehicles makes the source of the sound appear to emanate from a line (line source) rather than a point. The drop-off rate for a line source is 3 dBA for each doubling of distance.
Vibration
Groundborne vibration of concern in environmental analysis consists of the oscillatory waves that move from a source through the ground to adjacent structures. The number of cycles per second of oscillation makes up the vibration frequency, described in terms of hertz (Hz). The frequency of a vibrating object describes how rapidly it oscillates. The normal frequency range of most groundborne vibration that can be felt by the human body is from a low of less than 1 Hz up to a high of about 200 Hz.
While people have varying sensitivities to vibrations at different frequencies, in general they are most sensitive to low-frequency vibration. Vibration in buildings, such as from nearby construction activities, may cause windows, items on shelves, and pictures on walls to rattle. Vibration of building components can also take the form of an audible low-frequency rumbling noise, referred to as groundborne noise. Groundborne noise may result in adverse effects, such as building damage, when the originating vibration spectrum is dominated by frequencies in the upper end of the range (60 to 200 Hz). Vibration may also damage infrastructure when foundations or utilities, such as sewer and water pipes, physically connect the structure and the vibration source (Federal Transit Administration 2018). Although groundborne vibration is sometimes noticeable in outdoor environments, it is almost never annoying to people who are outdoors. The primary concern from Environmental Checklist
Noise
Initial Study 103
vibration is that it can be intrusive and annoying to building occupants and vibration-sensitive land uses.
Vibration energy spreads out as it travels through the ground, causing the vibration level to diminish with distance away from the source. High-frequency vibrations diminish much more rapidly than low frequencies, so low frequencies tend to dominate the spectrum at large distances from the source. Discontinuities in the soil strata can also cause diffractions or channeling effects that affect the propagation of vibration over long distances (California Department of Transportation 2013).
When a building is impacted by vibration, a ground-to-foundation coupling loss will usually reduce the overall vibration level. However, under rare circumstances, the ground-to-foundation coupling may actually amplify the vibration level due to structural resonances of the floors and walls.
Vibration amplitudes are usually expressed in peak particle velocity (ppv) or RMS vibration velocity.
The ppv and RMS velocity are normally described in inches per second (in/sec). The ppv is defined as the maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of a vibration signal. The Federal Transit Administration established standards for vibration impact assessments These guidelines are published in its Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual and are summarized below in Table 16.
Table 16 Federal Transit Administration Construction Vibration Impact Criteria Building Category in./sec. ppv
Reinforced – Concrete, Steel, or Timber (no plaster) 0.5 Engineered Concrete and Masonry (no plaster) 0.3
Non-engineered Timber and Masonry Buildings 0.2
Buildings Extremely Susceptible to Vibration Damage 0.12 Source: Federal Transit Administration 2018 I
Regulatory Setting
California Code of Regulations
The CCR, Title 24, Section 1207.4 requires interior noise levels attributable to exterior sources to be at or below 45 dBA in any habitable room of a development based on the noise metric used in the noise element of the local general plan. All residential windows, exterior doors, and exterior wall assemblies would be required to have sound transmission class ratings that would ensure adequate attenuation of noise at a range of frequencies. The Environmental Hazards Element of the City of San Leandro 2035 General Plan uses a noise metric of CNEL, consistent with the reference level for State noise law. Therefore, interior noise levels of the project would need to be at or below 45 dBA CNEL to be compliant with CCR requirements.
City of San Leandro 2035 General Plan
The Environmental Hazards Element of the General Plan provides goals, policies, and program to assure the appropriateness of new development with the noise environment of San Leandro.
Table 17 shows the General Plan’s land use compatibility chart. Applicable goals and policies are as follows:
Goal NOI-1 Ensure that noise associated with the day-to-day activities of San Leandro residents and businesses does not impede the peace and quiet of the community.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
104
EH-7.1 Noise Compatibility Table. Ensure that potential noise impacts are considered when new development is proposed. Projects that could significantly increase noise levels should incorporate mitigation measures to reduce such impacts. Apply the standards shown in Chart 7-2 when evaluating applications for future development. Chart 7-2 specifies the maximum noise levels that are normally acceptable, conditionally acceptable, and normally unacceptable for new development.
Table 17 City of San Leandro Noise and Land use Compatibility Guidelines Community Noise Exposure (CNEL dBA)
Land Use Category
Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally
Unacceptable
Clearly
Unacceptable
Residential: Low Density, Singlefamily, Duplex, Mobile Homes <60 55-70 70-75 75< Residential: Multi Family <65 60-70 70-75 75<
Transient lodging (hotels/motels) <60 60-70 70-80 80<
Schools, Libraries, Churches,
Hospitals, Nursing Homes
<70 60-70 70-80 80<
Auditoriums, Concert Halls,
Amphitheaters
NA 70> NA 65<
Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks <70 70-80 NA 7.25<
Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water
Recreation, Cemeteries
<75 70-80 NA 80<
Office Buildings, Business
Commercial and Professional
<70 67.5-75 75< NA
Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities,
Agriculture
<75 70-80 75< NA
Source: City of San Leandro 2016a
City of San Leandro Municipal Code
Chapter 4-1 of the City’s Municipal Code provides restrictions and regulations for noise within San Leandro. The noise-related code does not contain numerical noise level limits and is aimed more at prohibiting “disturbing, excessive and offensive noises” so as to abate public nuisances relative to noise. The following section forms the framework for these nuisance-related restrictions.
Section 4-1-110 of San Leandro Municipal Code establishes a general prohibition of noise which causes discomfort or annoyance to reasonable persons of normal sensitivity. The factors which should be considered in determining whether a violation of this section exists include but are not limited to the sound level of the objectionable and ambient noise, the proximity of the noise to residential property, and the duration of the noise.
Section 4-1-115 prohibits certain acts related to noise, such as construction-related noise near residential uses outside of the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on weekdays and 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. on weekends. Noise within public parks and noise that conflicts with residential uses is also prohibited.
Neither the City of San Leandro nor the County of Alameda has specific and/or quantitative regulatory standards for construction or operational vibration sources. San Leandro Zoning Code Part IV, Article 16, Division 3, Provision 4-1670B, Vibration, requires that no use, activity, or process Environmental Checklist
Noise
Initial Study 105
produce vibrations that are perceptible without instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of a site. This performance standard applies to all land use classifications in all zoning districts.
Project Noise Setting
Sensitive Receivers
Noise exposure goals for various types of land uses reflect the varying noise sensitivities associated with those uses. The San Leandro General Plan Environmental Hazards Element identifies noisesensitive land uses as residential land uses, schools, and open space and recreation areas (City of San Leandro 2016b). The nearest sensitive receiver is a residential subdivision located approximately 500 feet northeast of the project site boundary.
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
The proposed project would involve the use of heavy equipment during project construction.
According to the Federal Transit Administration, heavy equipment commonly used for construction can exceed 80 dBA at distances of 50 feet from the equipment. Some equipment can exceed 90 or even 100 dBA (Federal Transit Administration 2018). Construction equipment and construction truck trips on local streets could result in exceedance of noise standards at sensitive noise receptors in the vicinity of the project site.
During project operation, given the warehouse use and provision of tractor trailer parking on the site, tractor trailers could utilize routes passing near sensitive receptors, such as the nearest residences to the project site. Tractor trailers would potentially cause substantial noise and groundborne vibration at sensitive receptors.
The project site is in proximity to the Oakland International Airport; people working at the project site would be exposed to airport noise.
For these reasons, the noise impacts of the project would be potentially significant and will be evaluated in the EIR.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
106
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Population and Housing
Initial Study 107
14 Population and Housing
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (e.g., through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)? □ □ ■ □
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? □ □ □ ■
Setting
According to the California Department of Finance (DOF), San Leandro had an estimated population of 87,497 people with 33,223 housing units as of January 2023 (DOF 2023). The average number of persons per household is estimated at 2.70. The City of San Leandro General Plan Environmental Impact Report provides projections for the City’s population through the year 2030. The population of San Leandro is projected to be 103,300 by the year 2035 (City of San Leandro 2016b).
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
The project would not involve the extension of roads or other infrastructure that would lead to unplanned growth; the new warehouse would be constructed within City limits and connected to existing infrastructure systems and would not lead to unplanned indirect growth in the area. No new dwelling units are proposed; therefore, the project would not directly induce population growth in the City. The project would involve the construction of a new warehouse which would create jobs. Job creation could indirectly cause population growth through employee relocations to the project area. However, the project also includes demolishing existing industrial buildings, eliminating the potential jobs provided by business that could operate within them. Additionally, the project site is located in a dense urban area and many of these employees would likely be drawn from the local population regardless of the job creation potential of existing on-site vacant buildings. Some employees may relocate to the area as a result of job opportunities resulting from the proposed project; however, a substantial change in employment growth in the area would not occur.
As discussed in Section 11, Land Use and Planning, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan’s IG land use designation and would not induce substantial growth beyond what was City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
108
considered in the General Plan assumptions for the area. The project would be within the growth envisioned under the City’s General Plan and would not result in substantial population growth.
Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
There are no residences on the project site. The project would not displace existing people or housing and no impact would occur.
NO IMPACT
Environmental Checklist
Public Services
Initial Study 109
15 Public Services
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, or the need for
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
1 Fire protection? □ □ ■ □
2 Police protection? □ □ ■ □
3 Schools? □ □ ■ □
4 Parks? □ □ ■ □
5 Other public facilities? □ □ ■ □
Setting
The Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD) provides fire protection and emergency medical service to San Leandro. ACFD is divided into four branches: Operations, Special Operations, Fire Prevention, and Administrative Support Services (ACFD 2023a). ACFD operates six fire stations in San Leandro (Station Nos. 9 through 13 and 24) (ACFD 2023b). The closest fire station to the project site is ACFD Station No. 10, located 0.8 miles south of the project site at 2149 Williams Street (ACFD 2023b).
The San Leandro Police Department (SLPD) provides law enforcement services for the city. SLPD has one police station located at San Leandro City Hall at 835 East 14th Street, approximately 1.6 miles northeast of the project site. As of 2019, SLPD is staffed by 90 sworn personnel and 44 civilian employees (SLPD 2019).
The San Leandro Unified School District (SLUSD) and San Lorenzo Unified School District provide public educational services to San Leandro. SLUSD serves approximately 8,696 students across eight elementary schools, two middle schools, two high schools, and one adult education school (SLUSD 2022). According to SLUSD’s 2022 Developer Fee Justification Study, the district is under capacity, with enrollment availability for 1,146 additional students. Broken down by grade level, kindergarten through 6th grade facilities are under capacity by 703 students, 7th through 8th grades are under capacity for 532 students, and 9th through 12th grade facilities are over capacity by 110 students (SLUSD 2022). San Lorenzo Unified School District, specifically Dayton Elementary School and City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
110
Corvalis Elementary School, serve a small portion of southwestern San Leandro (San Lorenzo Unified School District 2022).
The City of San Leandro Public Works Department maintains neighborhood parks, special use recreation areas, community parks, and golf courses in the city, totaling 382.8 acres of improved parkland. The City’s General Plan Open Space, Parks, and Conservation Element outlines a goal to provide at least 5 acres of improved parkland for every 1,000 residents (City of San Leandro 2016a).
As discussed in Section 14, Population and Housing, the population of San Leandro is currently estimated at 87,497 people; therefore, the City has approximately 4.37 acres of improved parkland per 1,000 residents.4
Regulatory Setting
San Leandro 2035 General Plan
The City of San Leandro’s 2035 General Plan Community Services and Facilities Element addresses the provision of community services, including fire protection and police protection. Additionally, the element emphasizes the importance of reducing risk and the effects of disaster prevention and/or preparedness (City of San Leandro 2016a). The following policies found within the element are applicable to fire and police protection services within the City:
Goal CSF-1. Provide and maintain high-quality police, fire, and emergency medical services.
Policy CSF-1.1 Maintain high-quality police and fire protection services through the most efficient and effective possible means. The following minimum level of service standards for police and fire response time (exclusive of dispatch time) shall be maintained: (a) Police Services: 5 minute response time for 90 percent of all Priority One calls; (b) Fire Services: 5 minute response time for first due company for 90 percent of all emergency incidents, excluding freeway responses (3 firefighters including at least one paramedic); 10 minute response time for 90 percent for a full first alarm assignment response (17 firefighters).
Policy CSF-1.5 Require Police and Fire Department review of proposed development plans to ensure that sufficient provisions for emergency access and response are made, fire code requirements are satisfied, and adequate levels of service can be provided.
The Community Services and Facilities Element also addresses parkland, open space, and recreational facilities in and nearby San Leandro. The following policies found within the element are applicable to recreational facilities within the City:
Goal OSC-2 Develop additional parkland in the city to better meet existing needs and to respond to future needs.
Policy OSC-2.1 Achieve the following service standard for parks: (a) At least 5.00 acres of improved parkland per 1,000 residents; (b) A park within one-half mile of each San Leandro resident.
4 382.8 acres of improved parkland divided by 87,497 thousand residents in San Leandro is approximately 4.37 acres.
Environmental Checklist
Public Services
Initial Study 111
San Leandro Municipal Code
Section 7-5-800 adopts the California Fire Code, which contains regulations for safeguarding life and property from the hazards of fire and explosion; dangerous conditions arising from the storage, handling, and use of hazardous materials; and hazardous conditions in the use of occupancy of buildings. Development within San Leandro would be required to comply with the requirements on the California Fire Code.
Article 8 of Title 7 of the San Leandro Municipal Code enables the City Council to require dedication of lands deemed necessary for the purpose of constructing schools necessary to assure the residents of a subdivision have adequate elementary school service as a condition of final map approval for a subdivision.
San Leandro Municipal Code Chapter 7-13 establishes the City’s park facilities development impact fee which, pursuant to Government Code Section 66001, allows the City to apply fees to new development to pay for new or renovated park facilities. Development in San Leandro is required to pay appropriate park development fees. Further, San Leandro Municipal Code Section 7-1-810 requires that as a condition of approval of a tentative map or parcel map, subdivisions are required to offer to dedicate parkland, pay a fee in lieu, or a combination of both (at the option of the City).
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
1 Fire protection?
2 Police Protection?
ACFD and SLPD currently support the project site and would continue to provide fire and police protection services to the project site, as they did when on-site development was operational. As the project would not introduce a new use or activity onto the project site associated with substantially increased calls for services (e.g., nursing home, rehabilitation facility), and because the project would not result in substantial population or employment growth within the area (see Section 14, Population and Housing), it would not result in substantially increased demand for fire or police protection services on the site. Therefore, the project would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire or police protection facilities, and impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
3 Schools?
The project includes construction warehouse and would not include residential development. The project would not result in substantial population or employment growth within the area, and new City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
112
employment positions would be anticipated to be filled by the local labor force. Substantial numbers of people would not be expected to have to relocate into the project area to fill employment generated by the project (see Section 14, Population and Housing). Thus, a substantial increase in the number of school-aged children as a result of the project would not occur. Therefore, the project would not generate a substantial number of new students, and impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
4 Parks?
5 Other public facilities?
The proposed project does not include residential development which would generate an increased demand for parks or other public facilities, such as libraries. Additionally, the project applicant would be required to pay City park facilities development impact fees pursuant to San Leandro Municipal Code Chapter 7-13, which would support the addition of new parks or renovations to existing parks. Therefore, impacts to parks and recreational facilities would be less than significant, as would impacts to other public facilities.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Environmental Checklist
Recreation
Initial Study 113
16 Recreation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated? □ □ ■ □
b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment? □ □ ■ □
Setting
As discussed in Section 15, Public Services, the City of San Leandro Public Works Department maintains approximately 382.8 acres of improved parkland, and that there are approximately 4.37 acres of improved parkland per 1,000 residents. The nearest park to the project site is Warden Park. located approximately 0.3-mile northeast of the project site.
Regulatory Setting
Quimby Act
California Government Code Section 66477, also known as the Quimby Act, was enacted by the California legislature in 1965. The Quimby Act authorizes cities and counties to enact ordinances requiring the dedication of land, or the payment of fees for park and/or recreational facilities in lieu thereof, or both, by developers of residential subdivisions as a condition to the approval of a tentative tract map or parcel map. See Section 15, Public Services, subsection Regulatory Setting for additional policies and regulations relevant to recreation.
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The project would not include recreational facilities. As the project would replace an existing industrial use with a new industrial use, the project would not generate substantially increased demand for parks or other recreational facilities. This impact would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
114
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Transportation
Initial Study 115
17 Transportation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance
or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway,
bicycle and pedestrian facilities? □ □ ■ □
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)? ■ □ □ □
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)? ■ □ □ □
d. Result in inadequate emergency access? □ □ ■ □
The information and analysis included in this section is based upon the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) report prepared by Kimley Horn in January 2024. The report is included as Appendix F.
Setting
The site is located along Doolittle Drive, which is locally accessible via Davis Street, Adams Avenue, and Hester Street. Regional access is available to the site from I-880, which is approximately 0.4 miles west of the site. The following descriptions are provided for roadways that would provide access to the site and are most likely to serve most of the project’s generated vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian and transit traffic.
Existing Roadway Network
I-880 is a nine-lane, north-south freeway that connects San Leandro with nearby cities, such as Hayward and Oakland, and regional destinations, such as Fremont and San Jose. It also provides access to the greater freeway network with direct connections to Interstate 280 and State Route 17 to the south to Interstate 80 and Interstate 580 to the north. Within the study area, the roadway consists of six southbound lanes (including one HOV lane) and four northbound lanes.
I-880 serves as regional access to the project site. The posted speed limit on I-880 within the study area is 65 mph.
Doolittle Drive is a north-south arterial. It connects to Otis Drive and Fernside Boulevard to the north and Belvedere Avenue to the south. The roadway within the study area is two lanes in each direction and has a center two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL). It serves mainly industrial uses along the corridor. Within the study area, the speed limit on Doolittle Drive is 45 miles per hour.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
116
Davis Street is a four-lane, east-west arterial which runs between Business Center Drive and E 14th Street. The roadway serves residential and commercial uses. Within the study area, the speed limit on Davis Street is 35 miles per hour.
Adams Avenue is a two-lane, east-west collector between Doolittle Drive and Bigge Street. The roadway includes Class II bike lanes and on-street parking and serves industrial uses. Within the study area, the speed limit on Adams Avenue is 35 miles per hour. Hester Street is a two-lane, north-south local road connecting to Adams Avenue. The roadway includes onstreet parking and serves industrial uses. Within the study area, there is no posted speed limit but given the classification of the road, it is assumed that the speed limit is 25 miles per hour.
Airport Access Road is a five-lane, minor collector that connects to Bessie Coleman Drive and Hegenberger Road. The roadway provides access to the Oakland International Airport. Within the study area, there is no posted speed limit but given the classification of the road, it is assumed that the speed limit is 35 miles per hour.
98th Avenue is a minor arterial which connects to Bessie Coleman Drive to the west and Golf Links Road to the east. The roadway within the study area consists of six-lanes and serves multiple uses. Within the study area, the posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour.
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle facilities are defined by the following four classes by the California Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual:
Class I (Bike Path): Provides a completely separate facility designed for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with crossing points minimized. Bike paths typically serve corridors not served by streets and highways or where wide right of way exists, permitting such facilities to be constructed away from the influence of parallel streets. Class II (Bike Lane): Provides a restricted right-of-way designated lane for the exclusive or semiexclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and cross-flows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Bike lanes are established along streets in corridors where there is significant bicycle demand, and where there are distinct needs that can be served by them.
Class III (Bike Route): Shared facilities which provide continuity to other bicycle facilities (usually Class II bikeways) or designate preferred routes through high demand corridors. Class IV (Separated Bikeways): Provides an exclusive right-of-way including a separation required between the separated bikeway and the through vehicular traffic.
There are sections of Class II bikes lanes in the project vicinity. There are marked Class II bike lanes along Adams Avenue and Doolittle Drive.
There are also Class III bike routes that provide connections between bike lane facilities. One Class III bike route in the vicinity of the project site is located along Doolittle Drive between Davis Street and Carden Street.
Existing Pedestrian Facilities
There are existing continuous sidewalks on both sides of Doolittle Drive adjacent to the project site where pedestrians can access the site, as well as existing continuous sidewalks on both sides of Adams Avenue and on the east side of Hester Street. There are also existing crosswalks along the east, south, and west legs at the signalized intersection of Doolittle Drive and Davis Street, and Environmental Checklist
Transportation
Initial Study 117
existing crosswalks on the east and south legs at the signalized intersection of Doolittle Drive and Adams Street.
Within the project site, there are marked pedestrian crosswalks connecting the accessible parking spaces to the sidewalks along the west side of the building. These sidewalks along the west side of the building provide access to the office spaces.
Existing Transit Facilities
The transit system in the study area includes bus and rail services provided by Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). AC transit operates five routes within the project area: Routes 34, 35, 73, 98, and 805. The nearest bus stop is located at the intersection of Westgate Parkway and Davis Street, which is approximately 0.9 miles southeast of the project site. The San Leandro BART station, which serves the Blue, Green, and Orange BART lines, is located within 2.1 miles east of the project site. The San Leandro LINKS shuttle is a free shuttle to and from the San Leandro BART station that operates a North Loop and South Loop. The North Loop runs along Davis Street from the BART station to Marina Boulevard, Merced Street, Williams Street, Doolittle Drive, and Davis Street. There is an existing stop located at Doolittle Drive and Davis Street. Pedestrians can travel between the LINKS bus stop and the project site using the existing sidewalks located along both sides of Davis Street.
Regulatory Setting
The determination of significance for project impacts is based on applicable policies, regulations, goals, and guidelines defined by the City of San Leandro, Santa Clara County, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and the State.
State Regulations
SENATE BILL 743
On September 27, 2013, SB 743 was signed into law. The legislature found that with the adoption of the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375), the State had signaled its commitment to encourage land use and transportation planning decisions and investments that reduce vehicle miles traveled and thereby contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, as required by the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32). In December 2018, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) finalized new CEQA guidelines (CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3), that identify VMT as the most appropriate criteria to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts.
In November 2017, OPR released a technical advisory containing recommendations regarding the assessment of VMT, proposed thresholds of significance, and potential mitigation measures for lead agencies to use while implementing the required changes contained in Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). Also in November 2017, OPR released the proposed text for Section 15064.3, “Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts,” which summarized the criteria for analyzing transportation impacts for land use projects and transportation projects and directs lead agencies to “choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project’s vehicle miles traveled, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household or in any other measure.” OPR recommends that for most instances a per service population threshold should be adopted and that a fifteen percent reduction below that of existing development would be a reasonable threshold.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
118
CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 32, SENATE BILL 32, AND SENATE BILL 375 The “California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006” (AB 32) outlines California’s major legislative initiative for reducing GHG emissions. AB 32 codifies the statewide goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, a reduction of approximately 15 percent below emissions expected under a “business as usual” scenario. On September 8, 2016, the governor signed Senate Bill 32 (SB 32) into law, extending the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 by requiring the state to further reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (the other provisions of AB 32 remain unchanged).
The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375), signed in August 2008, enhances the state’s ability to reach AB 32 goals by directing CARB to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved from passenger vehicles by 2020 and 2035. SB 375 aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG reduction targets, and affordable housing allocations.
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are required to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), which allocates land uses in the MPO’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Qualified projects consistent with an approved SCS or Alternative Planning Strategy (categorized as “transit priority projects”) can receive incentives to streamline CEQA processing.
On March 22, 2018, CARB adopted updated regional targets for reducing GHG emissions from 2005 levels by 2020 and 2035. ABAG was assigned a 19 percent reduction in per capita GHG emissions from passenger vehicles by 2035. SB 375 also provides the option for the coordinated development of subregional plans by the subregional councils of governments and the county transportation commissions to meet SB 375 requirements. On October 21, 2021, ABAG formally adopted the RTP/SCS titled Plan Bay Area 2050, which meets the requirements of SB 375.
Local Regulations
SAN LEANDRO 2035 GENERAL PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
The San Leandro 2035 General Plan Transportation Element establishes the following applicable goals and policies relevant to transportation:
Policy T-1.2 Mitigation of Development Impacts. Require developers to address the impacts that their projects will have on the City’s transportation system. A variety of mitigation measures, including impact fees, street improvements, traffic signal and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) improvements, transportation demand management (TDM) measures, and improvement of non-automobile transportation modes, should be considered.
Policy T-1.10 Reduced Trip Generation. Encourage local employers to develop programs that promote ridesharing, flextime and telecommuting, bicycle use, and other modes of transportation that reduce the number and distance of vehicle trips generated.
Policy T-2.6 Building Design and Site Planning. Ensure that the site planning and design of new development promotes the use of non-auto modes of transportation by including amenities such as sidewalks, bike lockers, and bus shelters.
Policy T-3.5. Accommodation of Bicycles and Pedestrians. Require new development to incorporate design features that make walking, bicycling, and other forms of nonmotorized transportation more convenient and attractive. Facilities for bicycles and pedestrians, including secured bicycle parking, clearly marked crosswalks, well- Environmental Checklist
Transportation
Initial Study 119
lit streets and sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture should be provided within new employment areas, shopping destinations, multi-modal transportation facilities, and community facilities.
Policy T-6.7 Siting of Businesses with Truck Traffic. To the extent feasible, locate businesses projected to generate large amounts of truck traffic away from residential areas.
Ingress and egress for such businesses should be designed to minimize the possibility of truck traffic impacting residential streets.
The Transportation Element also establishes a tiered Level of Service (LOS) system. LOS is a measure of the quality or performance of a transportation system based on factors such as travel time, traffic volume, and congestion. LOS is typically evaluated on a scale of “A,” corresponding to no congestion and free-flowing traffic, to “F,” corresponding to extreme congestion and delays. For planning purposes, LOS D is the minimum acceptable service level for intersections outside of designated Priority Development Areas and LOS E is the minimum acceptable service level for intersections within designated Priority Development Areas.
SCREENING CRITERIA AND THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Since the City of San Leandro has not adopted VMT impact thresholds of significance, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) VMT impact thresholds are used to evaluate VMT impacts. This is generally consistent with OPR’s technical advisory, which provided recommended metrics and impact thresholds for residential, office, and retail projects, since they tend to have the greatest influence of land use projects on VMT in California.
Given that the project would include warehouse uses, it was assumed that the employee VMT for this project would have a similar VMT as an employee for an office use. Therefore, the TIA analyzed this project as an office project.
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation refers to the process of estimating the amount of vehicular traffic a project would add to the surrounding roadway system. Kimley Horn developed estimated project trip generation for the proposed project based on published trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) publication Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). Table 18 shows the trips expected to be generated by the proposed project.
Table 18 Project Trip Generation
Vehicle Type Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Passenger Car 1,497 167 36 203 110 172 282
Truck 46 2 3 5 2 3 5
Total New Trips 1,543 169 39 208 112 175 287
Source: Appendix F
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
120
ROADWAYS
Pursuant to SB 743 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, congestion on roadways is not considered a significant impact pursuant to CEQA. Additional congestion as a result of project implementation would not result in significant impacts under CEQA. While SB 743 prohibits the use of level of service or automobile delay in the determination of environmental significance, the City’s General Plan Transportation Element has LOS standards that it desires to maintain, as described under Local Regulations. For informational purposes, a LOS analysis has been performed in accordance with City standards; this analysis is not used for the purpose of determining impacts under CEQA. According to the City of San Leandro, an adverse effect on intersection operations occurs when the analysis demonstrates that a project would cause an intersection to operate at LOS D or lower outside of Priority Development Areas. The project site is not within a Priority Development Area and would be subject to this threshold.
Table 19 shows the existing LOS of intersections near the project site and the projected LOS of these intersections with the project and other cumulative development in the project area.
Table 19 Project and Cumulative Development Intersection Level of Service Intersection
Existing LOS
Near Term plus
Project LOS
Cumulative plus
Project LOS
AM PM AM PM AM PM Impact?
Doolittle Drive/West Project
Driveway (Worst Approach)
C B C C D D No
Hester Street/North Project
Driveway (Worst Approach)
A A B B B B No
Hester Street/Adams Avenue
(Worst Approach)
B B B B C B No
Doolittle Drive/Adams Avenue B B B B B C No
Doolittle Drive/Davis Street F D F E F F Yes
Davis Street/SB I-880 Ramps B B B B B C No
Davis Street/NB I-880 Ramps B B B B B C No
Airport Access Road/98th
Avenue
C D C D E F Yes
Bold denotes exceeds City standard
Source: Appendix F
As shown in Table 19, the Doolittle Drive and Davis Street intersection would operate below LOS D during AM and PM peak hours for all scenarios, and the Airport Access Road and 98th Avenue intersection would operate below LOS D during AM and PM peak hours for the cumulative plus project scenario. However, these effects to LOS at these intersections would be projected to occur without implementation of the project, and the project would negligibly contribute to LOS effects at these intersections. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in substantially adverse effects related to LOS, and the project would be consistent with the City’s General Plan.
PUBLIC TRANSIT FACILITIES
The project would generate public transit trips on existing transit services near the project site.
Because the project would not be expected to substantially increase vehicle traffic or vehicle speed Environmental Checklist
Transportation
Initial Study 121
in the existing roadway network around the project site, the project would not result in delays or interruptions to existing transit services. According to the TIA, since the LINKS route serves as a sufficient transit facility in proximity to the project along Davis Street to nearby uses, no additional transit facilities would be required to be constructed (Appendix F). The project would not include features that would conflict with City of regional plans, policies, or ordinances pertaining to public transit. No significant impacts to transit facilities would occur, and the project would not conflict with the City’s General Plan.
BICYCLE FACILITIES
An impact would occur to bicycle facilities if the proposed project were to disrupt existing bicycle facilities or be inconsistent with adopted City standards. There are several bike facilities in the vicinity of the project site which future employees would have access to, as described under Existing Bicycle Facilities. Because the project would not be anticipated to substantially increase vehicle traffic or vehicle speed in the existing roadway network around the project site, the bicycle level of traffic stress would not substantially change as a result of the project. Further, the project would provide 12 short-term bicycle parking spaces and 12 long-term bicycle parking spaces for a total of 24 bicycle parking spaces. The project would not include features that would be hazardous to bicycles, nor would it generate bicycle demand that would exceed the capacity of the area’s bicycle network. Although the project could facilitate industrial or logistics uses involving large vehicles like tractor trailers, which could conflict with bicycle safety, this is consistent with existing industrial uses near the project site. The project would not conflict with City or regional plans, policies or ordinances pertaining to bicycle facilities or travel (Appendix F). No significant impacts to bicycle facilities would occur.
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
An impact to pedestrian facilities would occur if the project were to disrupt existing pedestrian facilities or be inconsistent with pedestrian system plans, guidelines, or policies. Because the project would not be anticipated to substantially increase vehicle traffic or vehicle speed in the existing roadway network around the project site, the pedestrian facilities in the project site vicinity would not be substantially diminished as a result of the project. The project would include several pedestrian improvements to the site including lighting, internal sidewalks, improved landscaping, and pedestrian amenities. New sidewalks would also be constructed as part of the project along the project site frontage on Hester Street. Adequate street lighting would be provided by additional proposed street lighting and internal lighting on the project site. Therefore, no impact to pedestrian facilities would occur.
Table 20 below describes project consistency with applicable policies from the San Leandro General Plan Transportation Element.
Table 20 Project Consistency with General Plan Transportation Element Policy Consistency
Policy T-1.2. Mitigation of Development Impacts. Require developers to address the impacts that their projects will have on the City’s transportation system. A variety of mitigation measures, including impact fees, street improvements, traffic signal and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) improvements, transportation demand management (TDM) measures, and improvement of non-automobile transportation modes, should be considered.
Consistent. The project applicant would be
required to pay development impact fees
pursuant to Chapter 7-11 of the San Leandro
Municipal Code.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
122
Policy Consistency
Policy T-1.10. Reduced Trip Generation. Encourage local employers to develop programs that promote ridesharing, flextime and telecommuting, bicycle use, and other modes of transportation that reduce the number and distance of vehicle trips generated.
Consistent. The project would include 24
bicycle parking spaces and would be located
near public transit stops, which would
encourage alternative modes of
transportation. Additionally, as discussed
under Roadways, the project would not
generate a number of trips that would
adversely affect the LOS of intersections near
the project site.
Policy T-2.6. Building Design and Site Planning. Ensure that the site planning and design of new development promotes the use of nonauto modes of transportation by including amenities such as sidewalks, bike lockers, and bus shelters.
Consistent. The project would include 24
bicycle parking spaces and improved
sidewalks.
Policy T-3.5. Accommodation of Bicycles and Pedestrians. Require new development to incorporate design features that make walking, bicycling, and other forms of nonmotorized transportation more convenient and attractive. Facilities for bicycles and pedestrians, including secured bicycle parking, clearly marked crosswalks, well-lit streets and sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture should be provided within new employment areas, shopping destinations, multi-modal transportation facilities, and community facilities.
Consistent. The project would include 24
bicycle parking spaces, maintaining existing
sidewalks, and exterior lighting to
accommodate bicycles and pedestrians.
Policy T-6.7. Siting of Businesses with Truck Traffic. To the extent feasible, locate businesses projected to generate large amounts of truck traffic away from residential areas. Ingress and egress for such businesses should be designed to minimize the possibility of truck traffic impacting residential streets.
Consistent. As shown in Table 18, the project
would generate approximately 1,497
passenger vehicle trips and 46 truck trips per
day. The project site would utilize two
driveways for ingress and egress on the
northwestern and southwestern portions of
the site, away from the residential subdivision
located 500 feet northeast of the project site,
and a total of 64 loading docks would be
constructed, 27 on the north side and 37 on
the south side of the warehouse.
Source: City of San Leandro 2016
The project would be consistent with the San Leandro General Plan Transportation Element.
Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
As described under Setting, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 identifies VMT as the most appropriate criteria to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts. As discussed in the TIA, based on the VMT per Employee map for the East Planning Area in year 2020 provided by the ACTC, the project is located in an area with a VMT equal to 15.34. The target VMT, which is 15 percent below the average, for East Planning Area, Alameda County, and Bay Area Region is 16.3, 13.5, and 15.4 respectively. Since the proposed project exceeds the Alameda County threshold, the project could result in a potentially significant VMT impact. Therefore, this impact would be potentially significant and this issue will be analyzed further in an EIR.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Environmental Checklist
Transportation
Initial Study 123
c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)? Currently, vehicle access to the project site is from a driveway on Doolittle Drive and a driveway on Hester Street. The proposed project would maintain these driveways while adding an additional driveway on Hester Street, for a total of three driveways. No other intersections would be modified.
Therefore, ingress and egress to the project site would not create dangerous intersections. In addition, according to the TIA, the sight triangles at the driveway along Doolittle Drive are clear of obstructions for a vehicle exiting the driveway to observe oncoming northbound and southbound vehicles along Doolittle Drive. The driveways on Hester Street are and would be at the end of Hester Street, reducing the amount of vehicle traffic passing the driveways.
The project site is in an industrial area of San Leandro. While the project could involve industrial or logistic tenants using large trucks, large trucks such as tractor trailers already operate on project area roadways. However, compared to existing conditions which are a vacant site, the project would generate vehicle trips, including both passenger vehicles and large truck trips. More vehicles would utilize the driveway between Doolittle Drive and the project site during project operation, according to the TIA (Appendix F). The TIA recommends installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of this driveway and Doolittle Drive. The proposed project does not include installation of a traffic signal at this intersection. Accordingly, impacts would be potentially significant, and this issue will be analyzed further in an EIR.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? The project would not require lane or road closures during construction. During operation, emergency access to the project site would be available via the driveways along Doolittle Drive and Hester Street. The internal circulation roads would be suitable for fire engines and ambulances, and emergency vehicles would be able to circulate through the entirety of the project site, including to access fire hydrants along the borders of the warehouse. The project would provide adequate emergency access, and impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
124
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Tribal Cultural Resources
Initial Study 125
18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in a Public Resources Code
Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
or cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native American
tribe, and that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? □ ■ □ □
b. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native
American tribe. □ ■ □ □
Setting
There are no tribes within the City of San Leandro. Therefore, AB 52 consultation was not required or conducted by the City. No known tribal cultural resources exist on the project site.
Regulatory Setting
Assembly Bill 52
As of July 1, 2015, California Assembly Bill 52 of 2014 (AB 52) was enacted and expands CEQA by defining a new resource category, “tribal cultural resources.” AB 52 establishes that “A project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment” (PRC Section 21084.2). It further City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
126
states that the lead agency shall establish measures to avoid impacts that would alter the significant characteristics of a tribal cultural resource, when feasible (PRC Section 21084.3).
PRC Section 21074 (a)(1)(A) and (B) defines tribal cultural resources as “sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe” and is:
1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying these criteria, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.
AB 52 establishes a formal consultation process for California Tribes regarding those resources. The consultation process must be completed before a CEQA document can be certified. Under AB 52, lead agencies are required to “begin consultation with a California Native American Tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project.” Native American tribes to be included in the process are those that have requested notice of projects proposed within the jurisdiction of the lead agency.
Impact Assessment
a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?
b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code 21074 that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? As described in Section 5, Cultural Resources, neither the cultural resources records search nor Sacred Lands File search identified cultural resources listed on or eligible for listing on the CRHR or a local register within the project site. However, there is always potential to uncover buried archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources during ground disturbing activities, such as excavation required for project construction. If project construction activities encounter and damage or destroy a tribal cultural resource or resources, impacts would be potentially significant.
Implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would be required.
Mitigation Measures
TCR-1 Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources In the event that cultural resources of Native American origin are identified during project construction, all earth-disturbing work within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily suspended or redirected until an archaeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find as a cultural resource and an appropriate local Native American representative is consulted. If the City, in consultation with local Native American tribes, determines that the resource is a tribal cultural resource and thus significant under CEQA, a mitigation plan shall be prepared and implemented in Environmental Checklist
Tribal Cultural Resources
Initial Study 127
accordance with state guidelines and in consultation with local Native American group(s). The plan shall include avoidance of the resource or, if avoidance of the resource is infeasible, the plan shall outline the appropriate treatment of the resource in coordination with the appropriate local Native American tribal representative and, if applicable, a qualified archaeologist. The plan shall include measures to ensure the find is treated in a manner that respectfully retains, to the degree feasible, the qualities that render the resource of significance to the local Native American group(s).
Examples of appropriate mitigation for tribal cultural resources include, but are not limited to, protecting the cultural character and integrity of the resource, protecting traditional use of the resource, protecting the confidentiality of the resource, or heritage recovery.
Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would minimize impacts to tribal cultural resources encountered during project construction. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation implemented. This mitigation measure will be included in the EIR’s Executive Summary and in the project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
128
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Checklist
Utilities and Service Systems
Initial Study 129
19 Utilities and Service Systems
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects? □ □ ■ □
b. Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years? □ □ ■ □
c. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to
the provider’s existing commitments? □ □ ■ □
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals? □ □ ■ □
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste? □ □ ■ □
Setting
Potable Water
Water service to the City of San Leandro is provided by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), a public utility. EBMUD is responsible for service connections and water delivery to most of Alameda County and much of Contra Costa County. San Leandro comprises about 6 percent of the EMBUD’s customer base and uses about 5 percent of its water. As discussed in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality, approximately 90 percent of the EBMUD water supply originates from the Sierra Nevada via the Mokelumne River watershed, with the other 10 percent sourced from runoff on East Bay Area watershed lands. Water delivered to San Leandro customers is treated at the Orinda or Upper San Leandro water treatment plants (EBMUD 2021).
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
130
Each water district adopts an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), which is a long-range planning document used to assess current and projected water usage, water supply planning and conservation and recycling efforts. The EBMUD adopted a 2020 UWMP and a 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan which determined that under base condition assumptions, EBMUD can meet customer demand out to 2050 during normal years and single dry years; however, during multi-year droughts, even with customer demand reduction measures in place, EBMUD will need to obtain supplemental supplies to meet customer demands (EBMUD 2021). Projections are summarized across the different water supply scenarios through the year 2050 in Table 21.
Table 21 EBMUD Normal and Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison 2020-2050 EBMUD Planning
Level of Demand 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Normal Year
Mokelumne Supply (mgd) >181 >186 >190 >194 >201 >209 >218 Demand (taf) 181 186 190 194 201 209 218
Need for Water (taf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Single Dry Year
Mokelumne Supply (mgd) 121 126 129 132 138 144 151
CVP Supplies (mgd) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Total Supplies (mgd) 181 186 189 192 198 204 211
Voluntary Rationing (%) 0 0 1 1 2 2 3
Need for Water (taf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Second Dry Year
Mokelumne Supply (mgd) 82 86 89 92 98 104 111
CVP Supplies (mgd) 74 74 74 74 74 74 74
Total Supplies (mgd) 156 161 164 167 172 178 185
Mandatory Rationing (%) 13 13 13 14 14 14 15
Need for Water (taf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Third Dry Year
Mokelumne Supply (mgd) 141 145 146 145 132 118 105
CVP Supplies (mgd) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Total Supplies (mgd) 153 157 158 157 144 130 117
Mandatory Rationing (%) 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Need for Water – Base Condition
(taf) 0 0 0 0 28 52 75
Need for Water – High Demand
Scenario (taf)
0 0 21 35 60 97 125
Need for Water – Extreme
Drought Scenario (taf)
0 0 0 13 32 55 84
mgd = million gallons per day
taf = thousand acre-feet
CVP = Central Valley Project
Source: EBMUD 2021
Environmental Checklist
Utilities and Service Systems
Initial Study 131
EBMUD distributes its water through a system of pipelines, storage reservoirs, water treatment plants, and pumping plants Within the EBMUD service area, the water distribution network includes 4,200 miles of pipe, 167 water distribution reservoirs, and 131 water pumping plants. EBMUD’s water supply system delivers 325 mgd to its 1.4 million customers and has a capacity of 830 million gallons (EBMUD 2021, City of San Leandro 2016b).
There are currently no major water storage facilities in San Leandro. Rather, the city is served by nearby facilities in Castro Valley and Oakland, including the Dunsmuir Reservoir just outside the northeastern city limits. Pipelines in San Leandro range from 4 to 36 inches in diameter. EBMUD operates and maintains all water distribution lines within the city and is responsible for all facilities up to the location of the water meter (City of San Leandro 2016b).
Wastewater
The city’s sewer system consists of approximately 130 miles of pipe, ranging from 6 inches to 42 inches in diameter, and 13 remote lift stations. The City maintains roughly two thirds of the sewers within the city limits, primarily serving the northern portion of the city. The remainder of the city, including the project site, is served by the Oro Loma Sanitary District (OLSD). The San Francisco RWQCB established wastewater treatment requirements for the OLSD wastewater treatment plant and the EBDA outfall in an NPDES Permit (Order No. R2-2012-0004), adopted in 2012. The NPDES Order sets a framework for operation of the plant and effluent from the plant (City of San Leandro 2016b).
The OLSD serves a population of approximately 47,945, which includes residents and businesses.
OLSD and Castro Valley Sanitary District jointly own OLSD’s treatment plant, which has a permitted capacity of 20 mgd and treats an average dry weather flow of 12 mgd (OLSD 2023).
Stormwater
The City of San Leandro Department of Public Works owns and maintains 175 miles of storm drain conduits throughout the city. The city’s storm drain system feeds into a larger system owned and operated by the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Stormwater from the project site drains west to Washington Avenue, where it is collected by storm drains into the City’s stormwater system. Stormwater runoff is collected and disposed of by an integrated system of storm drains, inlets, curbside gutters, catch basins, drainage ditches, and man-made channels.
Ultimately, stormwater that enters the City’s system drains to the San Francisco Bay (City of San Leandro 2023).
Solid Waste
The City of San Leandro has two distinct service areas for refuse and recycling services: San Leandro Sanitary District and Oro Loma Sanitary District. The two service providers that serve these areas are Alameda County Industries (City’s franchisee) and Waste Management of Alameda County (OLSD’s franchisee). As of 2019, the City’s solid waste was sent to seven landfills, as summarized below in Table 22. About 81 percent of San Leandro’s solid waste was sent to the Altamont Landfill Resource Recovery Facility and the Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill (CalRecycle 2019).
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
132
Table 22 Estimated Landfill Capacities and Closure Date Landfill Facility
Permitted
Capacity
(cubic yards)
Remaining
Capacity
(cubic yards)
Maximum
Permitted
Throughput
(tons per day)
Anticipated
Closure Date
Altamont Landfill Resource Recovery Facility 124,400,000 65,400,000 11,150 2070 Fink Road Landfill 14,640,000 7,184,701 2,400 20231
North County Landfill and Recycling Center 41,200,000 35,400,000 825 2048 Potrero Hills Landfill 83,100,000 13,872,000 4,330 2048 Recology Hay Road Landfill 37,000,000 30,433,000 2,400 2077 Redwood Landfill 26,077,000 26,000,000 2,300 2036
Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill 40,207,100 11,560,000 2,518 2051 CalRecycle identifies Maximum Permitted Throughput only in Tons/Day, while Maximum Permitted Capacity and Remaining Capacity are only provided in Cubic Yards; therefore, standard conversion factors provided by the EPA (U.S. EPA 2016) are used to provide all figures in both Tons and Cubic Yards. EPA identifies a standard conversion factor for Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) compacted to “Landfill Density” of 1,700 pounds per cubic yard, equating to approximately 0.8 ton per cubic yard of compacted MSW. 1 Fink Road Landfill has an estimated cease operation date of December 1, 2023 Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency 2016 Source: CalRecycle 2019
Other Utilities
Electricity would be provided to the project site by EBCE via Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) infrastructure. Infrastructure capable of supporting electric and telecommunications is present at the project site and in the project vicinity.
Regulatory Setting
State
CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
Part 11 of the Title 24 Building Standards is referred to as the California Green Building Standards (CALGreen) Code and was developed to help the State achieve its GHG reduction goals under HSC Division 25.5 (e.g., AB 32) by codifying standards for reducing building-related energy, water, and resource demand, which in turn reduces GHG emissions from energy consumption, water storage and delivery, and other resource consumption activities. The purpose of the CALGreen Code is to “improve public health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices in the following categories: (1) planning and design; (2) energy efficiency; (3) water efficiency and conservation; (4) material conservation and resource efficiency; and (5) environmental air quality.” The CALGreen Code is not intended to substitute for or be identified as meeting the certification requirements of any green building program that is not established and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission. The CALGreen Code establishes mandatory measures for new residential and non-residential buildings. Such mandatory measures include energy efficiency, water conservation, material conservation, planning and design, and overall environmental quality.
On August 11, 2021, the CEC adopted the 2022 Title 24 Standards, which went into effect on January 1, 2023. The 2022 standards continue to improve upon the previous (2019) Title 24 Environmental Checklist
Utilities and Service Systems
Initial Study 133
standards for new construction of, and additions and alterations to, residential and non-residential buildings (CEC 2023a). The 2022 Title 24 Standards “build on California’s technology innovations, encouraging energy efficient approaches to encourage building decarbonization, emphasizing in particular on heat pumps for space heating and water heating. This set of Energy Codes also extends the benefits of photovoltaic and battery storage systems and other demand flexible technology to work in combinations with heat pumps to enable California buildings to be responsive to climate change. This Energy code also strengthens ventilation standards to improve indoor air quality. This update provides crucial steps in the state’s progress toward 100 percent clean carbon neutrality by midcentury” (CEC 2023b). The 2022 Energy Code is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by 10 MMT of CO2e over the next 30 years and result in approximately 1.5 billion dollars in consumer savings (CEC 2023c). Compliance with Title 24 is enforced through the building permit process.
ASSEMBLY BILL (AB) 939
The California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939, Sher, Chapter 1095, Statutes of 1989 as amended [IWMA]) made all California cities, counties, and approved regional solid waste management agencies responsible for enacting plans and implementing programs to divert 25 percent of their solid waste by 1995 and 50 percent by year 2000. Later legislation mandates the 50 percent diversion requirement be achieved every year. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) oversees and provides assistance to local governments as they develop and implement plans to meet the mandates of the IWMA and subsequent legislation.
City of San Leandro
SAN LEANDRO 2035 GENERAL PLAN
The following policies of the City’s General Plan are related to the provision of utilities and service systems in San Leandro:
Policy CSF-6.2 Fair Share Costs. Require future development to pay its fair share of the cost of improving the water, sewer, storm drainage, and other infrastructure systems needed to serve that development. Development impact fees, development agreements, and other appropriate forms of mitigation should be used to cover the costs of upgrading or expanding public infrastructure.
Policy CSF-6.4 Wastewater Collection and Treatment. Maintain efficient, environmentally sound, and cost-effective wastewater collection and treatment services in San Leandro.
Policy CSF-6.5 Capacity. Maintain adequate capacity at the San Leandro wastewater treatment plant to accommodate projected levels of growth within the service area and encourage the Oro Loma Sanitary District to do the same. Support efforts to maintain and/or improve the high quality of treated effluent at both plants and increase the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of using recycled wastewater for nonpotable purposes.
SAN LEANDRO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROL ORDINANCE The City of San Leandro manages stormwater and regulates discharge into storm drains through a Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The City adheres to the SWRCB requirements for permitting for specific types of industrial and construction activities, such as obtaining a NPDES permit prior to construction.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
134
Impact Analysis
a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
WATER
The project would generate water demand at the project site. The estimated water usage for project operation would be approximately 1,006,000 gallons per year. This estimation is based on water duty factors of 15 gallons per square foot of office space per year and 3.4 gallons per square foot of warehouse space per year (US Energy Information Administration 2017).5 1,006,000 gallons per year equates to approximately 0.003 mgd, which would represent less than
0.003 percent of projected EBMUD water supplies across normal, single dry, and multiple dry years.
As determined in the EBMUD UWMP, there is adequate water supply available to serve anticipated growth within Alameda County through the year 2050. EBMUD adopted a 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan which aims to protect the water supply in the event of an emergency such as a drought or earthquake, and to implement and enforce regulations and restrictions for managing a water shortage (EBMUD 2020). The project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities, and the project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Impacts would be less than significant.
WASTEWATER
Conservatively assuming that the project’s sewer flow would be 100 percent of its anticipated water use, the project would generate approximately 1,006,000 gallons of wastewater per year. The project would be served by OLSD and would have a connection to the OLSD sewer system, which directs wastewater to the treatment plant jointly owned by OLSD and Castro Valley Sanitary District.
The treatment plant has a permitted capacity of 20 mgd and treats an average dry weather flow of
12.4 mgd (OLSD 2022). Therefore, the OLSD treatment plant has approximately 7.6 mgd of remaining capacity.
The 1,006,000 gallons of wastewater per year generated by the project equates to approximately 1 million gallons per year, or less than 0.003 mgd. This daily wastewater generation rate would represent less than 0.03 percent of the OLSD treatment plant’s remaining capacity. Additionally, the project applicant would be required to submit a sanitary sewer plan to the OLSD for approval, and obtain an OLSD district permit prior to connecting to the OLSD sewer system. The project would not 5 15 gallons per square foot of office space per year, multiplied by 15,000 square feet of office space, equals 225,000 gallons per year. 3.4 gallons per square foot of warehouse space per year, multiplied by 229,573 square feet of warehouse space, equals approximately 781,000 gallons per year. 225,000 gallons per year plus 781,000 gallons per year equals approximately 1,006,000 gallons per year.
Environmental Checklist
Utilities and Service Systems
Initial Study 135
require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities, and would be served by a wastewater treatment provider with adequate capacity for the project’s projected demand. Impacts would be less than significant.
STORMWATER
Although the site is currently vacant, precipitation falling on the existing impervious surfaces at the site generate stormwater runoff and discharge to the City’s storm drain system. The project would continue to connect to the existing storm drain system operated and maintained by the City of San Leandro. As discussed in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the project would decrease the amount of impervious surfaces at the project site compared to existing conditions due to the inclusion of increased landscaping, so that the amount of runoff would decrease. Stormwater runoff from the impervious project surfaces, such as the proposed warehouse, surface parking areas, and internal access roads would be treated on-site before discharging to the existing storm drain system. On-site treatment would occur with a series of bioswales. Bioswales would be constructed throughout the site, generally within surface parking areas, but also adjacent to the proposed warehouse and internal access roads. Bioswales would be designed to capture and slow/pool runoff from impervious surface. As runoff collects in the bioswales, infiltration into the underlying ground would occur, reducing the volume of runoff that continues toward discharge into the storm drain system. Slowing the velocity of runoff by directing it into bioswales also allows sediment and other solids and suspended pollutants to settle out before the runoff is discharged into the storm drain system. After entering on-site bioswales, treated runoff that does infiltrate the ground would enter new storm drain inlets installed in each bioswale. The inlets would connect to a new storm drain pipeline connected beneath new surface parking areas and internal access roads. The new storm drain pipeline would connect to an existing storm drain main that exists beneath the surface of the existing site driveway from Doolittle Drive. Additionally, the project would also be required to comply with NPDES permit requirements and C.3 Stormwater Guidelines. Impacts would be less than significant.
ELECTRICITY, NATURAL GAS, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
As discussed in Section 6, Energy, the project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy. In addition, the project would not require the construction of new electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities because it is located in an urban area already served by those utilities and would not require additional capacity.
Therefore, the project would not result in significant environmental impacts due to the construction of new utility facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
d. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
The proposed project would generate solid waste during construction and operation. During construction, the current CalGreen code would require that 65 percent of construction and demolition debris be diverted. Handling of debris and waste generated during construction would City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
136
be subject to CalGreen requirements and Chapter 3-7 of San Leandro Municipal Code, which would require the project applicant to submit a Debris Recycling Statement. This statement would require the applicant to report the estimated volume or weight of construction debris, the amount of debris that was diverted via reuse or recycling, and information regarding the facility the applicant proposed to use to salvage, collect, or receive diverted material. Therefore, the project would not impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.
Operation of the project would generate an estimated 3,350 pounds of solid waste per day. This estimation is based on solid waste generation rates provided by CalRecycle, which estimate that office uses generate 6 pounds of solid waste per 1,000 square feet per day and warehouse uses generate 1.42 pounds per 100 square feet per day (CalRecycle 2015).6 The generated 3,350 pounds of solid waste per day would equate to 1.68 tons per day or 613 tons per year.
Solid waste from the project site would be collected by Waste Management of Alameda County and likely sent to the Altamont Landfill Resource Recovery Facility. Table 23 shows the project’s estimated solid waste generation and the remaining capacity of these landfills (CalRecycle 2019).
Table 23 Generated Solid Waste and Estimated Landfill Capacity Project Solid Waste Generation
(tons/day)
Permitted Throughput of Altamont
(tons/day)
Remaining Capacity of Altamont
(cubic yards)
1.68 11,150 65,400,000
Source: CalRecycle 2019
Project generated waste per day would be less than 0.02 percent of Altamont Landfill’s allowable waste limit and project generated waste annually would be less than 0.0007 percent of Altamont Landfill’s remaining capacity. The project would be required to comply with City and State plans and policies to reduce solid waste generation, including a requirement to divert at least 50 percent of solid waste and recyclables as required by Assembly Bill 939. The project’s incremental increase in solid waste would not adversely affect solid waste facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.
LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
6 6 pounds per 1,000 square feet of office space per day, multiplied by 15,000 square feet of office use, is 90 pounds of solid waste generated per day by office uses. 1.42 pounds per 100 square feet of warehouse space per day, multiplied by 229,573 square feet of warehouse use, is approximately 3,260 pounds per day. 90 pounds plus 3,260 pounds is approximately 3,350 pounds of solid waste generated by the project per day.
Environmental Checklist
Wildfire
Initial Study 137
20 Wildfire
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas
or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones, would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan? □ □ □ ■
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks and
thereby expose project occupants to
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? □ □ □ ■
c. Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment? □ □ □ ■
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslopes or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire slope instability,
or drainage changes? □ □ □ ■
Setting
According to maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), most of San Leandro is within a Local Responsibility Area and is not located within a Fire Hazard Severity Zone. However, small portions of the city along its eastern border are classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones within Local Responsibility Areas (CAL FIRE 2006). The project site is not within a Fire Hazard Severity Zone and is located approximately 2.7 miles west of the nearest Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
Impact Analysis
a. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
138
b. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslopes or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
The project site is not in a CAL FIRE designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and is located approximately 3 miles west of the nearest Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CALFIRE 2023). The project site is separated from the nearest Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone by urban development, which does not facilitate the spread of wildfire due to the lack of wildland fuels.
Additionally, the prevailing wind direction in San Leandro is west to east for nine months of the year and from north to south for three months of the year (WeatherSpark 2023); therefore, prevailing winds would blow wildfires away from the project site and from the city toward the East Bay Hills.
Project implementation would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, as discussed in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, or exacerbate wildfire risks. Further, the project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslopes or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post fire slope instability, or drainage changes in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire severity zones. No impact would occur.
NO IMPACT
Environmental Checklist
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Initial Study 139
21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than -
Significant
Impact No Impact
Does the project:
a. Have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory? ■ □ □ □
b. Have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that
the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)? ■ □ □ □
c. Have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or
indirectly? ■ □ □ □
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? As discussed in Section 4, Biological Resources, the project would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife species population to drop below selfsustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. The project could result in potentially significant impacts to nesting birds. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce impacts to protected birds and bats to less than significant levels.
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
140
As discussed in Section 5, Cultural Resources, and Section 7, Geology and Soils, no historical, archaeological, or paleontological resources were identified on site. Additionally, as discussed in Section 18, Tribal Cultural Resources, there are no known tribal cultural resources within the project site. Nevertheless, it is always possible to encounter cultural, paleontological, or tribal cultural resources during ground disturbing activities. Implementation of mitigation measures CR-1, GEO-1, and TCR-1 would reduce impacts to previously undiscovered cultural, tribal cultural resources, and paleontological resources to less than significant levels by providing a process for evaluating and, as necessary, avoiding impacts to any resources found during construction. Therefore, impacts to important examples of California history or prehistory would be less than significant.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? As defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15335, “cumulative impacts” refer to two or more individual impacts that, when considered together, are substantial or will compound other environmental impacts. San Leandro is an urbanized area with ongoing projects throughout the City. As discussed in Section 1, Aesthetics, through Section 20, Wildfire, most of the potential impacts of the proposed project would be less than significant, either with or without mitigation, depending on the specific impact. These less than significant impacts would not have considerable contributions to a significant cumulative impact because they’re either site specific, such as impacts to paleontological resources, or because the project is consistent with standards and programs, such as zoning standards established in the San Leandro Municipal Code pertaining to aesthetics. Other less than significant impacts would not contribute to potentially significant impacts because they have negligible impacts to existing conditions, such as impacts to population and housing, public services, and recreation. However, the potentially significant impacts identified in this Initial Study are severe enough that they could have a considerable contribution to a significant impact, when combined with the impacts from other nearby projects in San Leandro. The cumulative impacts of the proposed project will be evaluated in the EIR for the following impacts of CEQA topics:
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Noise
Transportation
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
In general, impacts to human beings are associated with air quality, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and wildfire impacts. As discussed in Section 3, Air Quality, the project would not have significant air quality impacts on humans. The project would also not have significant impacts on humans related to geology and soils or greenhouse gas emissions, as discussed in Section 7, Geology and Soils, and Section 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, respectively. Wildfire impacts would also be less than significant (see Section 20, Wildfire). As discussed in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, impacts related to groundwater, vapor, or soil contamination would be potentially significant as a result of project implementation and will be Environmental Checklist
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Initial Study 141
further evaluated in the EIR. Likewise, the potential noise and vibration impacts of the project, as discussed in Section 13, Noise, would be potentially significant and will be evaluated in the EIR.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
142
This page intentionally left blank.
References
Initial Study 143
References
Bibliography
Alameda County Community Development Agency. 2010. Oakland International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
https://www.acgov.org/cda/planning/generalplans/documents/OAK_ALUCP_122010_FULL. pdf
Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD). 2023a. About Us. https://fire.acgov.org/about-us/ Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD). 2023b. Stations and Facilities. https://fire.acgov.org/stations-and-facilities/
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017. Clean Air Plan. https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/plans/2017-clean-airplan/attachment-a_-proposed-final-cap-vol-1-pdf.pdf Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2022 CEQA Guidelines. https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental-quality-actceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2017.2017 Scoping Plan. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/ab-32-climate-change-scoping-plan/2017-scoping-plan-documents California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022. “Overview: Diesel Exhaust & Health.” https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/overview-diesel-exhaust-and-health California Department of Conservation. 1996. Mineral Land Classification. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc California Department of Conservation. 2018. California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/.
California Department of Conservation. 2021. Alameda County Tsunami Hazard Areas [interactive map]. Retrieved on November 1, 2023, from
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps/alameda California Department of Conservation. 2022. Williamson Act Enrollment Finder. https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/item.html?id=81496a0daba7465b89d90bfed5 3c2252
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2021. Timberland Conservation Program. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Timber
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2023. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/
California Department of Recycling and Resource Recovery. 2015. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates California Department of Recycling and Resource Recovery. 2019. Transported Solid Waste. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Statewide/TransportedSolid Waste
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
144
California Energy Commission (CEC). 2021a. 2021 Total System Electric Generation. https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2021- total-system-electric-generation
California Energy Commission (CEC). 2021b. “California’s Petroleum Market.” https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/californias-petroleum-market California Energy Commission (CEC). 2021c. “California Retail Fuel Outlet Annual Reporting (CECA15) Results.” https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/transportationenergy/california-retail-fuel-outlet-annual-reporting California Energy Commission (CEC). 2022a.Electricty Consumption by County. https://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx
California Energy Commission (CEC). 2022b. Gas Consumption by County. http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx
California Energy Commission (CEC). 2023a. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiencystandards/2022-building-energy-efficiency California Energy Commission (CEC). 2023b. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings: For the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Title 24, Part 6, and Associated Administrative Regulations in Part 1. https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2022/2022-building-energy-efficiency-standardsresidential-and-nonresidential California Energy Commission (CEC). 2023c. Energy Commission Adopts Updated Building Standards to Improve Efficiency, Reduce Emissions From Homes and Businesses. https://www.energy.ca.gov/news/2021-08/energy-commission-adopts-updated-buildingstandards-improve-efficiencyreduce#:~:text=Over%20the%20next%2030%20years,the%20road%20for%20a%20year.
California Geological Survey. 2016. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/.
California Geological Survey. 2019.Landlside Inventory. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/lsi/.\ California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). Cortses List Data Resources. https://calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/
California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2023. Geotracker Database. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/.
Department of Finance (DOF). 2023. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates. https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-population-and-housingestimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2023/ Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Envirostor Database. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=880+doolittle+drive East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD). 2020. Water Shortage Contingency Plan. https://www.ebmud.com/download_file/force/9150/735?WSCP-2020-FINAL.pdf East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD). 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. https://www.ebmud.com/water/about-your-water/water-supply/urban-water-management-plan References
Initial Study 145
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2018. National Flood Insurance Program: Flood Insurance Rate Map: Alameda County and Incorporated Areas [Panel #06001C0252H]. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Federal Transit Administration. 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual: FTA Report 0123. September 2018. Retrieved on November 2, 2023, from https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no0123_0.pdf Guo, J. C. 2009. Preservation of Watershed Regime for Low-Impact Development through Detention. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15(1), 15-19 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGII_SummaryForPolic ymakers.pdf
Lim, H.S., Lim, W., Hu, J.Y., Zieglar, A., Ong, S.L. 2015. Comparison of filter media materials for heavy metal removal from urban stormwater runoff using biofiltration systems. Journal of environmental management 147: 24-33.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2022. NESDIS Rain Rate. https://data.noaa.gov/onestop/collections/details/21bde101-2f22-4eba-bf0b56e18680ccdb Oro Loma Sanitary District (OLSD). 2023. General Information about the District. https://oroloma.org/statistical-information/
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2017. San Francisco Bay Basin Plan. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/water_issues/programs/planningtmdls/b asinplan/web/bp_ch1-7_print.html
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2022. Regional Water Quality Control Board Map. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterboards_map.html San Leandro, City of. 2016a. San Leandro 2035 General Plan. Adopted September 19, 2022 and last amended 2022. Retrieved on September 12, 2023, from
https://www.sanleandro.org/332/General-Plan
San Leandro, City of. 2016b. San Leandro 2035 General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. https://www.sanleandro.org/332/GeneralPlan#:~:text=2035%20General%20Plan%20Update%20Environmental%20Impact%20Report &text=An%20EIR%20is%20a%20public,of%20a%20%22proposed%20project%22 San Leandro, City of. 2021. San Leandro 2021 Climate Action Plan. https://www.sanleandro.org/DocumentCenter/View/6490/San-Leandro-CAP-ADOPTED2021-08-06 San Leandro, City of. 2023. Storm Water. https://www.sanleandro.org/890/Storm-Water San Leandro Police Department (SLPD). 2019. 2019 Annual Report. https://www.sanleandro.org/356/Year-in-Review
San Leandro Unified School District (SLUSD). 2022. 2022 Developer Fee Justification Study. https://www.slusd.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/San-Leandro-Dev-Fee-Study-2022- final-1.pdf
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
146
United States Bureau of Land Management. 2016. Potential Fossil Yield Classification System.
Retrieved on November 11, 2023, from
https://www.blm.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/IM2016-124_att1.pdf United States Energy Information Administration. 2017. Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey: Water Consumption in Large Buildings Summary.
https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/reports/2012/water/ United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1999. Preliminary Data Summary of Urban Storm Water Best Management Practices. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-821-R99-012. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/usw_a.pdf United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2020. “Health and Environmental Effects of Hazardous Air Pollutants.” https://www.epa.gov/haps/health-and-environmental-effectshazardous-air-pollutants United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2021. Criteria Air Pollutants. https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants
United States Green Building Council. 2008. Appendix 2. Default Occupancy Counts. https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-existing-buildings-commercial-interiorscore-and-shell-schools-new-constr-3 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020. National Wetlands Inventory. https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/ United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AB4BT7UBZJEH3DMPZZO43I3DZE/resources (accessed October 2022).
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2016. Earthquake Outlook for the San Francisco Bay Region 2014-2023. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2016/3020/fs20163020.pdf.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2020. Geologic Map and Map Database of the Oakland Metropolitan Area, Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco Counties, California, R. W.
Graymer, Miscellaneous Field Studies MF–2342, scale 1:50,000.
WeatherSpark. 2023. Average Wind Direction in San Leandro, California. https://weatherspark.com/y/558/Average-Weather-in-San-Leandro-California-UnitedStates-YearRound#:~:text=The%20predominant%20average%20hourly%20wind,of%2094%25%20on%2 0August%2010.
List of Preparers
Rincon Consultants, Inc. prepared this Initial Study under contract to the City of San Leandro.
Persons involved in data gathering analysis, project management, and quality control are listed below.
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
Abe Leider, AICP CEP, Principal
George Dix, Project Manager
References
Initial Study 147
Hannah Bireschi, Environmental Planner
Nicole Yee, Environmental Planner
Samantha Kehr, Senior Biologist
Hannah Haas, MA, RPA, Senior Archaeologist
JulieAnn Murphy, Architectural Historian
Heather Dubois, Environmental Planner
Bill Vosti, Environmental Planner
City of San Leandro
880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project
148
This page intentionally left blank.
Appendix A
Air Quality Assessment
Air Quality Assessment
880 Doolittle Drive Project
City of San Leandro, California
Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
10 S. Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1250
San José, California 95113
Contact: Ms. Noemi Wyss, AICP
669.800.4152
November 2023
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction
1.1 Project Location................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 Environmental Setting
2.1 Climate and Meteorology................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Air Pollutants of primary Concern ...................................................................................................... 6
2.3 Ambient Air Quality ........................................................................................................................... 8
2.4 Sensitive Receptors............................................................................................................................ 9 3 Regulatory Setting
3.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................................ 12
3.2 Regional........................................................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Local................................................................................................................................................ 15 4 Significance Criteria and Methodology
4.1 Air Quality Thresholds...................................................................................................................... 17
4.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 18 5 Potential Impacts and Mitigation
5.1 Air Quality Analysis.......................................................................................................................... 19
5.2 Cumulative Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 30 6 References......................................................................................................................... 31 TABLES
Table 1: Air Contaminants and Associated Public Health Concerns.......................................................................... 7 Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Data........................................................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Sensitive Receptors................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 4: State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards..................................................................................... 12 Table 5: Bay Area Air Quality Management District Emissions Thresholds............................................................. 17 Table 6: Project Consistency with Applicable Clean Air Plan Control Measures...................................................... 19 Table 7: Construction-Related Emissions............................................................................................................... 22 Table 8: Maximum Daily Project Operational Emissions........................................................................................ 24 Table 9: Construction Risk .................................................................................................................................... 26 Table 10: Operational Risk Assessment Results..................................................................................................... 27 Table 11: Cumulative Operational Health Risk....................................................................................................... 28
EXHIBITS
Figure 1: Regional Vicinity....................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Site Vicinity .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3: Project Site Plan....................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 4: Sensitive Receptor Locations.................................................................................................................. 10
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Air Quality Modeling Data
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | ii
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
AQMP air quality management plan
AB Assembly Bill
ADT average daily traffic
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CO carbon monoxide
cy cubic yards
DPM diesel particulate matter
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FCAA Federal Clean Air Act
H2S hydrogen sulfide
Pb Lead
LST local significance threshold
µg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter
mg/m3 milligrams per cubic meter
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NO2 nitrogen dioxide
NOx nitrogen oxide
O3 Ozone
PM10 particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter ppm parts per million
ROG reactive organic gases
RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy SB Senate Bill
SRA source receptor area
SF square foot
SO4-2 Sulfates
SO2 sulfur dioxide
TAC toxic air contaminant
C2H3Cl vinyl chloride
VOC volatile organic compound
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 1
1 INTRODUCTION
This report describes the air quality conditions in the Project area. The current condition and air quality is used as the baseline against which to compare potential impacts of the Project. The purpose of this Air Quality Assessment is to evaluate potential short- and long-term noise impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed 880 Doolittle Drive Project (proposed Project) in the City of San Leandro.
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed Project is located at 880 Doolittle Drive, on the approximately 14.14-acre property (APNs # 77A-0741-004-02 and 77A-0741-005-00), in the City of San Leandro. Figure 1: Regional Vicinity and Figure 2: Site Vicinity depict the Project site in a regional and local context. The Project site is located in an urban area with a mix of surrounding uses including commercial, office, residential and industrial uses. The southern boundary comprises an existing railroad with commercial development beyond. The Project site’s existing land use designation is General Industrial (IG) and existing zoning designation is General Industrial (IG) Zoning District. The Project site is currently developed with an approximately 212,000 square foot (sf) industrial use building and associated parking.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project would demolish the existing 212,000 sf of on-site industrial use buildings and construct an approximately 244,5731
sf new warehouse. The proposed development would contain approximately 15,000 sf of ancillary office use, of which 5,000 sf of office use would be mezzanine level, refer to Figure 3: Project Site Plan. Sixty-four loading docks would be constructed as part of the proposed warehouse, 27 on the north side and 37 on the southside of the building. The proposed Project would include surface parking with 204 parking spaces, including 6 ADA stalls. Fifty-nine trailer stalls will also be provided and located to the north of the proposed warehouse building. Vehicular access to the Project site would be provided via three driveways. The two existing driveways (at Doolittle Drive and Hester Street) would be maintained, and a third driveway would be added from Hester Street.
The Project proposes several surface improvements, including new landscaping and reconfigured parking areas. Per City requirements (Municipal Code Section 2.12.320), proposed landscaping would comprise five percent of the Project site. The Project site has a general plan land use designation of General Industrial (IG) and is zoned Industrial General (IG). The IG designation may contain a wide range of manufacturing, transportation, food and beverage processing, technology, warehousing, vehicle storage, office-flex, and distribution uses. The IG zone permits new storage or wholesale/retail distribution facility warehouse uses with the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). 1 The modeling includes a more conservative 245,200 sf warehouse. The project size has decreased since the initial modeling. 880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Source: USGS, 2022
Figure 1: Regional Location Map
wy
Airp
ort
Dr
San Leandro Creek
98th Ave
61 112
Warden
Ave
Bigge St
Empire
Rd
n St
Do u
glas A
105th Ave
Preda St
Hun te
r
Av
e
B
e
rgedo Dr
A
rth
u
r
Ave
Earhart Rd
Martin Blvd
Ron Cowan Pkwy
Whitney St
Adams
Ave
Pardee Dr
Metropolitan
Golf Links
13 ft
112
Fairway Dr
Airport
Dr
Airport Dr
Williams St
Leonard Dr
Neptune
Dr
Marina Blvd
Davis St
Merced St
Doolittle
Dr
Oyster Bay
Mulford
Mulford
Gardens
Pershing Dr
Alvarado
St
San Leandro Blv
Sa
Williams St
Cedar Av
Ma
Kaiser
Permanente-San
Leandro
California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA Project Site
3rd St
S a n
F r a n c i s c o
Marina District
Bayview
District
Mission
District
Chinatown
San Francisco
Millbrae
Bayshore
South San
Francisco
San Bruno
S a n B r u n o
M o u n t a i n
S a n A n d r e a s R i f t Z o n e
17 Cr
ow Canyon Rd
MacArthur Fwy
Redwoo d Rd
St Marys Rd
Skyline Blvd
Park Bl vd
San Leandro St
Oakland Int'l
Airport
San Leandro
Canyon
Alameda
Berkeley
Oakland
S a n R a m o n V a l l e y
L a s T r a mp a s R i d g e
Nimitz Fwy
92 Huntwood Ave
Castro Valley
Union Ci ty
Hayward
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau o Management, EPA, NPS,
880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Figure 2: Project Vicinity Map
Source: Nearmap, 2022
Doolittle Drive
Project Site
Legend
Hester Street
Carden Street
Whitney Street
880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Figure 3: Conceptual Site Plan
Source: HPA Architecture, 2022
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 5
2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 CLIMATE AND METEOROLOGY
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) divides the State into 15 air basins that share similar meteorological and topographical features. The Project is located within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (Basin). This Basin comprises all of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties, the southern portion of Sonoma County, and the southwestern portion of Solano County. Air quality in this area is determined by such natural factors as topography, meteorology, and climate, in addition to the presence of existing air pollution sources and ambient conditions. These factors along with applicable regulations are discussed below. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) is responsible for local control and monitoring of criteria air pollutants throughout the Basin.
Climate, or the average weather condition, affects air quality in several ways. Wind patterns can remove or add air pollutants emitted by stationary or mobile sources. Inversion, a condition where warm air traps cooler air underneath it, can hold pollutants near the ground by limiting upward mixing (dilution).
Topography also affects the local climate, as valleys often trap emissions by limiting lateral dispersal.
The inversions typical of winter, called radiation inversions, are formed as heat quickly radiates from the earth's surface after sunset, causing the air in contact with it to rapidly cool. Radiation inversions are strongest on clear, low-wind, cold winter nights, allowing the build-up of such pollutants as carbon monoxide and particulate matter. When wind speeds are low, there is little mechanical turbulence to mix the air, resulting in a layer of warm air over a layer of cooler air next to the ground. During radiation inversions downwind transport is slow, the mixing depths are shallow, and turbulence is minimal, all factors which contribute to ozone formation.
The frequency of hot, sunny days during the summer months in the Basin is another important factor that affects air pollution potential. It is at the higher temperatures that ozone is formed. In the presence of ultraviolet sunlight and warm temperatures, reactive organic gases and oxides of nitrogen react to form secondary photochemical pollutants, including ozone.
The climate is dominated by the location and strength of a semi-permanent, subtropical high-pressure cell. In the summer, the Pacific cell is centered over the northeastern Pacific Ocean, resulting in stable meteorological conditions and a steady northwesterly wind flow. Upwelling of cold ocean water from below the surface because of the northwesterly flow produces a band of cold water off the coast which results in condensation and the presence of fog and stratus clouds along the coast. In the winter, the highpressure cell weakens and shifts southward, resulting in increased wind flow offshore, the absence of upwelling, and the occurrence of storms.
The Basin is characterized by moderately wet winters (November through March) and dry summers. The rainfall in the mountains reaches 40 inches while the valley sees less than 16 inches. Generally, coastal temperatures can be 35 degrees Fahrenheit cooler than temperatures 15 to 20 miles inland. At night, this contrast usually decreases to less than 10 degrees Fahrenheit. In the winter, the relationship of minimum and maximum temperatures is reversed.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 6
The Project site is located in the City of San Leandro and Alameda County, in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area. The area has a generally mild climate, with average high temperatures in the mid 80’s Fahrenheit in the summer and high 50’s Fahrenheit in the winter. The annual rainfall is approximately 21 inches in the County, primarily between October and May. The regulatory section below discusses the various buffer zones around sources of air pollution sufficient to avoid adverse health and nuisance impacts on nearby receptors.
2.2 AIR POLLUTANTS OF PRIMARY CONCERN
The air pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are regulated by federal and state laws. These regulated air pollutants are known as “criteria air pollutants” and are categorized into primary and secondary pollutants. Primary air pollutants are those that are emitted directly from sources. Carbon monoxide (CO), reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxide (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter (PM10), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead are primary air pollutants. Of these, CO, NOX, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5 are criteria pollutants. ROG and NOX are criteria pollutant precursors and go on to form secondary criteria pollutants through chemical and photochemical reactions in the atmosphere. For example, the criteria pollutant ozone (O3) is formed by a chemical reaction between ROG and NOX in the presence of sunlight. O3 and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are the principal secondary pollutants.
Sources and health effects commonly associated with criteria pollutants are summarized in Table 1: Air Contaminants and Associated Public Health Concerns.
Ozone, or smog, is not emitted directly into the environment, but is formed in the atmosphere by complex chemical reactions between ROG and NOX in the presence of sunlight. Ozone formation is greatest on warm, windless, sunny days. The main sources of NOX and ROG, often referred to as ozone precursors, are combustion processes (including motor vehicle engines) the evaporation of solvents, paints, and fuels, and biogenic sources. Automobiles are the single largest source of ozone precursors in the Basin. Tailpipe emissions of ROG are highest during cold starts, hard acceleration, stop-and-go conditions, and slow speeds. They decline as speeds increase up to about 50 miles per hour (mph), then increase again at high speeds and high engine loads. ROG emissions associated with evaporation of unburned fuel depend on vehicle and ambient temperature cycles. Nitrogen oxide emissions exhibit a different curve; emissions decrease as the vehicle approaches 30 mph and then begin to increase with increasing speeds.
Ozone levels usually build up during the day and peak in the afternoon hours. Short-term exposure can irritate the eyes and cause constriction of the airways. Besides causing shortness of breath, it can aggravate existing respiratory diseases such as asthma, bronchitis and emphysema. Chronic exposure to high ozone levels can permanently damage lung tissue. Ozone can also damage plants and trees, and materials such as rubber and fabrics.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 7
Table 1: Air Contaminants and Associated Public Health Concerns Pollutant Major Man-Made Sources Human Health Effects
Particulate Matter
(PM10 and PM2.5)
Power plants, steel mills, chemical
plants, unpaved roads and parking lots,
wood-burning stoves and fireplaces,
automobiles and others.
Increased respiratory symptoms, such as
irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty
breathing; asthma; chronic bronchitis; irregular
heartbeat; nonfatal heart attacks; and
premature death in people with heart or lung
disease. Impairs visibility.
Ozone (O3) Formed by a chemical reaction
between reactive organic gases/volatile
organic compounds (ROG or VOC)1 and
nitrogen oxides (NOX) in the presence of
sunlight. Motor vehicle exhaust
industrial emissions, gasoline storage
and transport, solvents, paints and
landfills.
Irritates and causes inflammation of the mucous
membranes and lung airways; causes wheezing,
coughing, and pain when inhaling deeply;
decreases lung capacity; aggravates lung and
heart problems. Damages plants; reduces crop
yield.
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
A colorless gas formed when fuel
containing sulfur is burned and when
gasoline is extracted from oil. Examples
are petroleum refineries, cement
manufacturing, metal processing
facilities, locomotives, and ships.
Respiratory irritant. Aggravates lung and heart
problems. In the presence of moisture and
oxygen, sulfur dioxide converts to sulfuric acid
which can damage marble, iron and steel.
Damages crops and natural vegetation. Impairs
visibility. Precursor to acid rain.
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
An odorless, colorless gas formed when
carbon in fuel is not burned completely;
a component of motor vehicle exhaust.
Reduces the ability of blood to deliver oxygen to
vital tissues, affecting the cardiovascular and
nervous system. Impairs vision, causes dizziness,
and can lead to unconsciousness or death.
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
A reddish-brown gas formed during fuel
combustion for motor vehicles and
industrial sources. Sources include
motor vehicles, electric utilities, and
other sources that burn fuel.
Respiratory irritant; aggravates lung and heart
problems. Precursor to ozone. Contributes to
global warming and nutrient overloading which
deteriorates water quality. Causes brown
discoloration of the atmosphere.
Lead (Pb) Lead is a metal found naturally in the
environment as well as in
manufactured products. The major
sources of lead emissions have
historically been motor vehicles (such
as cars and trucks) and industrial
sources. Due to the phase out of leaded
gasoline, metals processing is the major
source of lead emissions to the air
today. The highest levels of lead in air
are generally found near lead smelters.
Other stationary sources are waste
incinerators, utilities, and lead-acid
battery manufacturers.
Exposure to lead occurs mainly through
inhalation of air and ingestion of lead in food,
water, soil, or dust. It accumulates in the blood,
bones, and soft tissues and can adversely affect
the kidneys, liver, nervous system, and other
organs. Excessive exposure to lead may cause
neurological impairments such as seizures,
mental retardation, and behavioral disorders.
Even at low doses, lead exposure is associated
with damage to the nervous systems of fetuses
and young children, resulting in learning deficits
and lowered IQ.
1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs or Reactive Organic Gases [ROG]) are hydrocarbons/organic gases that are formed solely of hydrogen and carbon. There are several subsets of organic gases including ROGs and VOCs. Both ROGs and VOCs are emitted from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons or other carbon-based fuels. The major sources of hydrocarbons are combustion engine exhaust, oil refineries, and oil-fueled power plants; other common sources are petroleum fuels, solvents, dry cleaning solutions, and paint (via evaporation).
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Health Effects, capcoa.org/health-effects/, accessed December 2022.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 8
Toxic Air Contaminants
Toxic air contaminants (TACs) are airborne substances that can cause short‐term (acute) or long‐term (chronic or carcinogenic, i.e., cancer causing) adverse human health effects (i.e., injury or illness). TACs include both organic and inorganic chemical substances. They may be emitted from a variety of common sources including gasoline stations, automobiles, dry cleaners, industrial operations, and painting operations. The current California list of TACs includes more than 200 compounds, including particulate emissions from diesel‐fueled engines.
CARB identified diesel particulate matter (DPM) as a toxic air contaminant. DPM differs from other TACs in that it is not a single substance but rather a complex mixture of hundreds of substances. Diesel exhaust is a complex mixture of particles and gases produced when an engine burns diesel fuel. DPM is a concern because it causes lung cancer; many compounds found in diesel exhaust are carcinogenic. DPM includes the particle-phase constituents in diesel exhaust. The chemical composition and particle sizes of DPM vary between different engine types (heavy-duty, light-duty), engine operating conditions (idle, accelerate, decelerate), fuel formulations (high/low sulfur fuel), and the year of the engine. Some short-term (acute) effects of diesel exhaust include eye, nose, throat, and lung irritation, and diesel exhaust can cause coughs, headaches, light-headedness, and nausea. DPM poses the greatest health risk among the TACs.
Almost all diesel exhaust particle mass is 10 microns or less in diameter. Because of their extremely small size, these particles can be inhaled and eventually trapped in the bronchial and alveolar regions of the lung.
2.3 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
CARB monitors ambient air quality at approximately 250 air monitoring stations across the state. Air quality monitoring stations usually measure pollutant concentrations ten feet above ground level; therefore, air quality is often referred to in terms of ground-level concentrations. Existing levels of ambient air quality, historical trends, and projections near the Project site are documented by measurements made by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAAQMD)’s air pollution regulatory agency that maintains air quality monitoring stations, which process ambient air quality measurements.
Ozone (O3) and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are pollutants of concern in the BAAQMD. The closest air monitoring station to the Project site that monitors ambient concentrations of these pollutants is the Oakland-9925 International Boulevard Monitoring Station located approximately 2.9 miles northeast of the Project site. Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Data lists the monitored maximum concentrations and number of exceedances of federal or state air quality standards for each year between 2020 to 2022. Particulate matter (PM2.5) was exceeded in 2020 at the closest monitoring station.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 9
Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Data
Pollutant Oakland-9925 International Boulevard 1
2020 2021 2022
Ozone (O3)
1-hour Maximum Concentration (ppm) 0.090 0.083 0.069
8-hour Maximum Concentration (ppm) 0.066 0.061 0.055
Number of Days Standard Exceeded
CAAQS 1-hour (>0.09 ppm) 0 0 0
NAAQS 8-hour (>0.070 ppm) 0 0 0
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
1-hour Maximum Concentration (ppm) 0.0592 0.0487 0.0508 Number of Days Standard Exceeded
NAAQS 1-hour (>0.100 ppm) 0 0 0
CAAQS 1-hour (>0.18 ppm) 0 0 0
Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Microns (PM2.5)
National 24-hour Maximum Concentration 167.7 33.0 25.7
State 24-hour Maximum Concentration 167.7 33.0 25.7
Number of Days Standard Exceeded
NAAQS 24-hour (>150 µg/m3) 11 0 0
CAAQS 24-hour (>50 µg/m3) - - -
NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standards; CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standards; ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NM = not measured
1 Measurements taken at the Oakland – 9925 International Boulevard Monitoring Station located at 9925 International Boulevard, Oakland, California 94603 (CARB# 07448).
Source: All pollutant measurements are from the CARB Aerometric Data Analysis and Management system database (arb.ca.gov/adam) except for CO, which were retrieved from the CARB Air Quality and Meteorological Information System (https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqmis2/aqdselect.php, https://www.arb.ca.gov/qaweb/siteinfo.php).
2.4 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
Sensitive populations are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the general population.
Sensitive receptors in proximity to localized sources of toxics are of particular concern. Land uses considered sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, long‐term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes.
The Project site is located at the end of Doolittle Drive in the City of San Leandro. The surrounding land uses are predominantly general industrial and industrial park, with single-family residences located to the northeast. Table 3: Sensitive Receptors, lists the distances and locations of nearby sensitive receptors.
Figure 4: Sensitive Receptor Locations shows location of the nearest sensitive receptors.
Table 3: Sensitive Receptors
Receptor Description Distance and Direction from the Project Site 1 Single-Family Residences 500 feet northeast
2 Metropolitan Golf Links Course 700 feet west
3 Holiday Inn 0.50 miles north
Source: Google Earth, 2023.
880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Figure 4: Sensitive Receptor Locations
Source: Nearmap, 2022
Legend
Sensitive Receptor
Location 1
Project site
1 2
3 Single Family Residences
Metropolitan Gold Links Course
Holiday Inn Hotel
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 11
3 REGULATORY SETTING
3.1 FEDERAL AND STATE
Federal Clean Air Act
Air quality is federally protected by the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) and its amendments. Under the FCAA, the EPA developed the primary and secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the criteria air pollutants including ozone, NO2, CO, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, and lead. Depending on whether the standards are met or exceeded, the local air basin is classified as in “attainment” or “nonattainment.” Some areas are unclassified, which means no monitoring data are available. Unclassified areas are considered to be in attainment. Proposed projects in or near nonattainment areas could be subject to more stringent air-permitting requirements. The FCAA requires that each state prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP) to demonstrate how it will attain the NAAQS within the federally imposed deadlines.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated enforcement of air pollution control regulations to the individual states. Applicable federal standards are summarized in Table 4: State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards.
California Air Resources Board
CARB administers California’s air quality policy. The California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) were established in 1969 pursuant to the Mulford-Carrell Act. These standards, included with the NAAQS in Table 4, are generally more stringent and apply to more pollutants than the NAAQS. In addition to the criteria pollutants, CAAQS have been established for visibility reducing particulates, hydrogen sulfide, and sulfates. In general, the Bay Area experiences low concentrations of most pollutants when compared to federal standards, except for O3 and PM, for which standards are exceeded periodically. With respect to federal standards, the Bay Area’s attainment status for 8-hour ozone is classified as “marginal nonattainment” and “nonattainment” for PM2.5. The region is also considered to be in nonattainment with the CAAQS for PM10 and PM2.5. Area sources generate the majority of these airborne particulate emissions.
The Basin is considered in attainment or unclassified with respect to the CO, NO2 and SO2 NAAQS and CAAQS.
The California Clean Air Act (CCAA), which was approved in 1988, requires that each local air district prepare and maintain an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) to achieve compliance with CAAQS. These AQMPs also serve as the basis for the preparation of the SIP for meeting federal clean air standards for the State of California. Like the EPA, CARB also designates areas within California as either attainment or nonattainment for each criteria pollutant based on whether the CAAQS have been achieved. Under the CCAA, areas are designated as nonattainment for a pollutant if air quality data shows that a state standard for the pollutant was violated at least once during the previous three calendar years. Exceedances that are affected by highly irregular or infrequent events such as wildfires, volcanoes, etc. are not considered violations of a State standard, and are not used as a basis for designating areas as nonattainment. The applicable State standards are summarized in Table 4.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 12
Table 4: State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Averaging Time
State Standards1 Federal Standards2
Concentration Attainment
Status Concentration3 Attainment Status
Ozone
(O3)
8 Hour 0.070 ppm (137
µg/m3) N9 0.070 ppm N4
1 Hour 0.09 ppm (180
µg/m3) N NA N/A5
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
8 Hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) A 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) A6
1 Hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m3) A 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) A
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
1 Hour 0.18 ppm
(339 µg/m3) A 0.100 ppm11 U
Annual Arithmetic
Mean
0.030 ppm
(57 µg/m3) - 0.053 ppm (100 µg/m3) A
Sulfur Dioxide12
(SO2)
24 Hour 0.04 ppm
(105 µg/m3) A 0.14 ppm (365 µg/m3) A
1 Hour 0.25 ppm
(655 µg/m3) A 0.075 ppm (196 µg/m3) A
Annual Arithmetic
Mean NA - 0.03 ppm (80 µg/m3) A
Particulate Matter
(PM10)
24-Hour 50 µg/m3 N 150 µg/m3 -U
Annual Arithmetic
Mean 20 µg/m3 N7 NA -
Fine Particulate
Matter (PM2.5) 15
24-Hour NA - 35 µg/m3 U/A
Annual Arithmetic
Mean 12 µg/m3 N7 12 µg/m3 N
Sulfates (SO4-2) 24 Hour 25 µg/m3 A NA -
Lead (Pb)13, 14
30-Day Average 1.5 µg/m3 - NA A
Calendar Quarter NA - 1.5 µg/m3 A
Rolling 3-Month
Average NA - 0.15 µg/m3 -
Hydrogen Sulfide
(H2S) 1 Hour 0.03 ppm (42 µg/m3) U NA -
Vinyl Chloride
(C2H3CI) 24 Hour 0.01 ppm (26 µg/m3) - NA -
Visibility Reducing
Particles8
8 Hour
(10:00 to 18:00 PST) - U - -
A = attainment; N = nonattainment; U = unclassified; N/A = not applicable or no applicable standard; ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; mg/m3 = milligrams per cubic meter; – = not indicated or no information available.
1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1-hour and 24-hour), nitrogen dioxide, suspended particulate matter - PM10, and visibility reducing particles are values that are not to be exceeded. The standards for sulfates, Lake Tahoe carbon monoxide, lead, hydrogen sulfide, and vinyl chloride are not to be equaled or exceeded. If the standard is for a 1-hour, 8-hour or 24-hour average (i.e., all standards except for lead and the PM10 annual standard), then some measurements may be excluded. In particular, measurements are excluded that CARB determines would occur less than once per year on the average. The Lake Tahoe CO standard is 6.0 ppm, a level one-half the national standard and two-thirds the state standard.
2. National standards shown are the "primary standards" designed to protect public health. National standards other than for ozone, particulates and those based on annual averages are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The 1-hour ozone standard is attained if, during the most recent three-year period, the average number of days per year with maximum hourly concentrations above the standard is equal to or less than one. The 8-hour ozone standard is attained when the 3-year average of the 4th highest daily concentrations is 0.070 ppm (70 ppb) or less. The 24-hour PM10 standard is attained when the 3-year average of the 99th percentile of monitored concentrations is less than 150 µg/m3. The 24-hour PM2.5 standard is attained when the 3-year average of 98th percentiles is less than 35 µg/m3.
Except for the national particulate standards, annual standards are met if the annual average falls below the standard at every site. The national annual particulate standard for PM10 is met if the 3-year average falls below the standard at every site. The annual PM2.5 standard is met if the 3-year average of annual averages spatially-averaged across officially designed clusters of sites falls below the standard.
3. National air quality standards are set by the EPA at levels determined to be protective of public health with an adequate margin of safety.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 13
4. On October 1, 2015, the national 8-hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. An area will meet the standard if the fourth-highest maximum daily 8-hour ozone concentration per year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than 0.070 ppm. EPA will make recommendations on attainment designations by October 1, 2016, and issue final designations October 1, 2017. Nonattainment areas will have until 2020 to late 2037 to meet the health standard, with attainment dates varying based on the ozone level in the area.
5. The national 1-hour ozone standard was revoked by U.S. EPA on June 15, 2005.
6. In April 1998, the Bay Area was redesignated to attainment for the national 8-hour carbon monoxide standard. 7 In June 2002, CARB established new annual standards for PM2.5 and PM10. 8 Statewide VRP Standard (except Lake Tahoe Air Basin): Particles in sufficient amount to produce an extinction coefficient of 0.23 per kilometer when the relative humidity is less than 70 percent. This standard is intended to limit the frequency and severity of visibility impairment due to regional haze and is equivalent to a 10-mile nominal visual range.
9. The 8-hour CA ozone standard was approved by the Air Resources Board on April 28, 2005 and became effective on May 17, 2006.
10. On January 9, 2013, EPA issued a final rule to determine that the Bay Area attains the 24-hour PM2.5 national standard. This EPA rule suspends key SIP requirements as long as monitoring data continues to show that the Bay Area attains the standard. Despite this EPA action, the Bay Area will continue to be designated as “nonattainment” for the national 24-hour PM2.5 standard until such time as the Air District submits a “redesignation request” and a “maintenance plan” to EPA, and EPA approves the proposed redesignation.
11. To attain this standard, the 3-year average of the 98th percentile of the daily maximum 1-hour average at each monitor within an area must not exceed 0.100ppm (effective January 22, 2010). The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) expects to make a designation for the Bay Area by the end of 2017.
12. On June 2, 2010, the U.S. EPA established a new 1-hour SO2 standard, effective August 23, 2010, which is based on the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations. The existing 0.030 ppm annual and 0.14 ppm 24-hour SO2 NAAQS however must continue to be used until one year following U.S. EPA initial designations of the new 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.
13. CARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as ‘toxic air contaminants’ with no threshold level of exposure below which there are no adverse health effects determined.
14. National lead standard, rolling 3-month average: final rule signed October 15, 2008. Final designations effective December 31, 2011.
15. In December 2012, EPA strengthened the annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) from 15.0 to 12.0 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3). In December 2014, EPA issued final area designations for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Areas designated “unclassifiable/attainment” must continue to take steps to prevent their air quality from deteriorating to unhealthy levels. The effective date of this standard is April 15, 2015.
Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status, 2017 http://www.baaqmd.gov/researchand-data/air-quality-standards-and-attainment-status.
3.2 REGIONAL
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
The BAAQMD is the regional agency with jurisdiction over the nine-county region located in the Basin.
The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), county transportation agencies, cities and counties, and various nongovernmental organizations also join in the efforts to improve air quality through a variety of programs. These programs include the adoption of regulations and policies, as well as implementation of extensive education and public outreach programs.
Clean Air Plan
Air quality plans developed to meet federal requirements are referred to as State Implementation Plans.
The federal and state Clean Air Acts require plans to be developed for areas designated as nonattainment (with the exception of areas designated as nonattainment for the state PM10 standard). The BAAQMD is responsible for developing a Clean Air Plan, which guides the region’s air quality planning efforts to attain the CAAQS. The BAAQMD adopted the 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate on April 19, 2019, by the BAAQMD.
BAAQMD periodically develops air quality plans that outline the regional strategy to improve air quality and protect the climate. The most recent plan, 2017 Bay Area Clean Air Plan, includes a wide range of control measures designed to reduce emissions of air pollutants and GHGs, including the following City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 14
examples that may be relevant to this Project: reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants by adopting more stringent limits and methods for evaluating toxic risks; implement pricing measures to reduce travel demand; accelerate the widespread adoption of electric vehicles; promote the use of clean fuels; promote energy efficiency in both new and existing buildings; and promote the switch from natural gas to electricity for space and water heating in Bay Area buildings.
The 2017 Clean Air Plan provides a regional strategy to protect public health and protect the climate. To protect public health, the plan describes how the BAAQMD will continue progress toward attaining all state and federal air quality standards and eliminating health risk disparities from exposure to air pollution among Bay Area communities. To protect the climate, the 2017 Clean Air Plan defines a vision for transitioning the region to a post-carbon economy needed to achieve ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets for 2030 and 2050 and provides a regional climate protection strategy that will put the Bay Area on a pathway to achieve those GHG reduction targets. The 2017 Clean Air Plan contains districtwide control measures to reduce ozone precursor emissions (i.e., ROG and NOX), particulate matter, TACs, and greenhouse gas emissions. The Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan updates the Bay Area 2010 Clean Air Plan in accordance with the requirements of the California Clean Air Act to implement “all feasible measures” to reduce ozone; provides a control strategy to reduce ozone, PM, TACs, and greenhouse gases in a single, integrated plan; reviews progress in improving air quality in recent years; and establishes emission control measures to be adopted or implemented in both the short term and through 2050.
The 2017 Clean Air Plan includes a wide range of control measures designed to decrease emissions of the air pollutants that are most harmful to Bay Area residents, such as particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air contaminants; to reduce emissions of methane and other “super-GHGs” that are potent climate pollutants in the near-term; and to decrease emissions of carbon dioxide by reducing fossil fuel combustion.
The following BAAQMD rules would limit emissions of air pollutants from construction and operation of the Project:
• Regulation 8, Rule 3 – Architectural Coatings. This rule governs the manufacture, distribution, and sale of architectural coatings and limits the reactive organic gases content in paints and paint solvents. Although this rule does not directly apply to the Project, it does dictate the ROG content of paint available for use during the construction.
• Regulation 8, Rule 15 – Emulsified and Liquid Asphalts. This rule dictates the reactive organic gases content of asphalt available for use during construction through regulating the sale and use of asphalt and limits the ROG content in asphalt. Although this rule does not directly apply to the Project, it does dictate the ROG content of asphalt for use during the construction. • Regulation 9, Rule 8 – Organic Compounds. This rule limits the emissions of nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide from stationary internal combustion engines with an output rated by the manufacturer at more than 50 brake horsepower.
BAAQMD prepared an Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan to satisfy the federal 1-hour ozone planning requirement because of the Air Basin’s nonattainment for federal and State ozone standards. The U.S.
EPA revoked the 1-hour ozone standard and adopted an 8-hour ozone standard. The BAAQMD will address the new federal 8-hour ozone planning requirements once they are established.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 15
3.3 LOCAL
City of San Leandro 2035 General Plan
The San Leandro General Plan includes the following policies intended to control or reduce air pollution impacts:
Environmental Hazards Element
Goal EH-3 Promote and participate in efforts to improve the region’s air quality.
Policy EH-3.1 Clean Air Plan Implementation. Cooperate with the appropriate regional, state, and federal agencies to implement the regional Clean Air Plan and enforce air quality standards.
Policy EH-3.2 Transportation Control Measures. Promote strategies that help improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing the necessity of driving.
These strategies include more reliable public transportation, carpooling and vanpooling programs, employer transportation demand management (TDM) programs, better provisions for bicyclists and pedestrians, and encouraging mixed use and higher density development around transit stations.
Policy EH-3.3 Land Use Compatibility. Discourage new uses with potential adverse air quality impacts, including the emission of toxic air contaminants and fine particulates, near residential neighborhoods, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, and other locations where public health could potentially be affected.
Policy EH-3.4 Design, Construction, and Operation. Require new development to be designed and constructed in a way that reduces the potential for future air quality problems, such as odors and the emission of any and all air pollutants. This should be done by: (a) Requiring construction and grading practices that minimize airborne dust and particulate matter; (b) Ensuring that best available control technology is used for operations that could generate air pollutants; (c) Encouraging energy conservation and low-polluting energy sources; (d) Promoting landscaping and tree planting to absorb carbon monoxide and other pollutants; and (e) Implementing the complementary strategies to reduce greenhouse gases identified in the Climate Action Plan.
Policy EH-3.9 Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Promote the development of infrastructure which supports the use of alternative fuel (i.e., electric) vehicles, including electric charging stations and preferential parking for electric vehicles.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 16
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY
4.1 AIR QUALITY THRESHOLDS
State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G
Based upon the criteria derived from State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, a project normally would have a significant effect on the environment if it would:
AQ-1 Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? AQ-2 Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
AQ-3 Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? AQ-4 Resultin other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Air Quality Thresholds
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) is an expert commenting agency on air quality within its jurisdiction or impacting its jurisdiction. Under the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA), the BAAQMD has adopted Federal attainment plans for O3 and PM2.5. The BAAQMD reviews projects to ensure that they would not: (1) cause or contribute to any new violation of any air quality standard; (2) increase the frequency or severity of any existing violation of any air quality standard; or (3) delay timely attainment of any air quality standard or any required interim emission reductions or other milestones of any Federal attainment plan.
The BAAQMD Options and Justification Report (dated October 2009) establishes thresholds based on substantial evidence, and the thresholds are consistent with the thresholds outlined within the 2010/2011 BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (and current 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines). The thresholds have been developed by the BAAQMD in order to attain State and Federal ambient air quality standards.
Therefore, projects below these thresholds would not violate an air quality standard and would not contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.
The BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines provides significance thresholds for both construction and operation of projects. Ultimately the lead agency determines the thresholds of significance for impacts.
However, if a project proposes development in excess of the established thresholds, as outlined in Table 5: Bay Area Air Quality Management District Emissions Thresholds, a significant air quality impact may occur and additional analysis is warranted to fully assess the significance of impacts.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 17
Table 5: Bay Area Air Quality Management District Emissions Thresholds Criteria Air Pollutants and
Precursors (Regional)
Construction-Related Operational-Related
Average Daily Emissions
(pounds/day)
Average Daily
Emission
(pounds/day)
Annual Average
Emission
(tons/year)
Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 54 54 10
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 54 54 10
Coarse Particulates (PM10) 82 (exhaust) 82 15
Fine Particulates (PM2.5) 54 (exhaust) 54 10
PM10 / PM2.5 (fugitive dust) Best Management Practices None Local CO None 9.0 ppm (8-hour average)
20.0 ppm (1-hour average)
Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, 2017.
4.2 METHODOLOGY
This air quality impact analysis considers construction and operational impacts associated with the Project. Where criteria air pollutant quantification was required, emissions were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to quantify potential criteria pollutant emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects. Air quality impacts were assessed according to methodologies recommended by CARB and the BAAQMD.
Construction equipment, trucks, worker vehicles, and ground-disturbing activities associated with Project construction would generate emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors. Air quality impacts were assessed according to CARB and BAAQMD recommended methodologies. Daily regional construction emissions are estimated by assuming construction occurs at the earliest feasible date (i.e., a conservative estimate of construction activities) and applying off-road, fugitive dust, and on-road emissions factors in CalEEMod. The CalEEMod included BAAQMD dust mitigation measures as well as changes to vehicle trip lengths and fleet mix based on traffic data provided.
Project operations would result in emissions of area sources (consumer products), energy sources (natural gas usage), and mobile sources (motor vehicles from Project generated vehicle trips). Project-generated increases in operational emissions would be predominantly associated with motor vehicle use. The increase of traffic over existing conditions as a result of the Project was obtained from the Project’s Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by Kimley-Horn (December 2022). Other operational emissions from area, energy, and stationary sources were quantified in CalEEMod based on land use activity data.
As discussed above, the BAAQMD provides significance thresholds for emissions associated with proposed Project construction and operations. The proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions are compared to the daily criteria pollutant emissions significance thresholds in order to determine the significance of the Project’s impact on regional air quality.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 18
5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
5.1 AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS
Threshold AQ-1: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
BAAQMD’s most recently adopted plan, the Clean Air Plan, in the Basin outlines how the San Francisco area will attain air quality standards, reduce population exposure and protect public health, and reduce GHG emissions.
The Clean Air Plan assumptions for projected air emissions and pollutants in San Leandro are based on the San Leandro 2035 General Plan Land Use Designation Map which designates the Project site use as General Industrial (IG). The Project site is zoned General Industrial (IG). may contain a wide range of manufacturing, transportation, food and beverage processing, technology, warehousing, vehicle storage, office-flex, and distribution uses. The IG zone permits new storage or wholesale/retail distribution facility warehouse uses with the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). The Project would be consistent with the development assumptions for the land use. The proposed Project consists of 245,200 sf of industrial space consistent with the 2035 General Plan land use designation and would not increase the regional population growth or cause changes in vehicle traffic that would obstruct implementation of the Clean Air Plan in the San Francisco Bay Area Basin.
As described below, construction and operational air quality emissions generated by the proposed Project would not exceed the BAAQMD’s emissions thresholds. Since the proposed Project would not exceed these thresholds, the proposed Project would not be considered by the BAAQMD to be a substantial emitter of criteria air pollutants, and would not contribute to any non-attainment areas in the Basin.
The Project is anticipated to generate jobs within the City. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) predicts that job opportunities in San Leandro will grow to be 106,585 by the year 2040. The Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and only slightly larger than the existing industrial use. The Project would generate some new jobs but would be within the ABAG growth projections for the City. Therefore, the Project would not exceed the level of population or housing in regional planning efforts. Additionally, the proposed Project would not significantly affect regional vehicle miles travelled pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines (Section 15206). Therefore, population growth from the Project would be consistent with ABAG’s projections for the City and within the City’s General Plan.
A project would be consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan if it would not exceed the growth assumptions in the plan. The primary method of determining consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan growth assumptions is consistency with the General Plan land use designations and zoning designations for the site. It should be noted that the Clean Air Plan does not make a specific assumption for development on the site, but bases assumptions on growth in population, travel, and business, based on socioeconomic forecasts. As noted above, the Project would not exceed the growth assumptions in the General Plan.
Therefore, the growth assumptions in the Clean Air Plan would not be exceeded.
In addition, projects are considered consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan if they incorporate all applicable and feasible control measures from the 2017 Clean Air Plan and would not disrupt or hinder implementation of 2017 Clean Air Plan control measures.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 19
The Project is consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan policies that are applicable to the Project site. As discussed in Table 6: Project Consistency with Applicable Clean Air Plan Control Measures, the Project would comply with City, State, and regional requirements.
Table 6: Project Consistency with Applicable Clean Air Plan Control Measures Control Measure Project Consistency
Stationary Source Control Measures
SS21: New Source Review of Toxic Air
Contaminants
Consistent. The Project would not include new stationary uses that would generate new sources of TAC that would impact nearby sensitive receptors.
SS25: Coatings, Solvents, Lubricants,
Sealants and Adhesives Consistent. The Project would comply with Regulation 8, Rule 3:
Architectural Coatings, which would dictate the ROG content of paint available for use during construction. SS26: Surface Prep and Cleaning Solvent
SS29: Asphaltic Concrete
Consistent. Paving activities associated with the Project would be required to utilize asphalt that does not exceed BAAQMD emission standards in Regulation 8, Rule 15.
SS31: General Particulate Matter
Emissions Limitation
Consistent. This control measure is implemented by the BAAQMD through Regulation 6, Rule 1. This Rule Limits the quantity of particulate matter in the atmosphere by controlling emission rates, concentration, visible emissions and opacity. The Project would be required to comply with applicable BAAQMD rules.
SS32: Emergency Back-up Generators
Consistent. Use of back-up generators by the Project is currently not anticipated. However, if emergency generators were to be installed, they would be required to meet the BAAQMD’s emissions standards for back-up generators.
SS34: Wood Smoke Consistent. The Project would comply with BAAQMD Regulation 6, Rule 3 and prohibit the construction of wood burning appliances/ fireplaces.
SS36: Particulate Matter from
Trackout
Consistent. Mud and dirt that may be tracked out onto the nearby public roads during construction activities would be removed promptly by the contractor based on BAAQMD’s requirements.
SS37: Particulate Matter from
Asphalt Operations
Consistent. Paving and roofing activities associated with the Project would be required to utilize best management practices to minimize the particulate matter created from the transport and application of road and roofing asphalt.
SS38: Fugitive Dust
Consistent. Material stockpiling and track out during grading activities as well as smoke and fumes from paving and roofing asphalt operations would be required to utilize best management practices, such as watering exposed surfaces twice a day, covering haul trucks, keeping vehicle speeds on unpaved roads under 15 mph, to minimize the creation of fugitive dust.
SS40: Odors
Consistent. The Project is an industrial development and is not anticipated to generate odors. The Project would comply with BAAQMD Regulation 7 to strengthen odor standards and enhance enforceability.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 20
Control Measure Project Consistency
Transportation Control Measures
TR2: Trip Reduction Programs Consistent. The Project is an industrial facility that would require onsite employees and delivery vehicle trips. The Project is an infill development, in the vicinity of different land use types, and located within 2,000 feet of transit stops along Davis Street, which would encourage alternative transportation modes. This would help reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and mobile greenhouse gas emissions.
TR8: Ridesharing and Last-Mile
Connections
TR9: Bicycle and Pedestrian Access
Facilities
Consistent. Bicycle facilities in the area include Doolittle Drive and Adams Avenue which provide Class II bike lanes with buffered striping to separate the vehicle and bike travel way. Most of these corridors feature green paint markings in potential conflict areas and at signalized intersections. Bicycle parking in the surrounding area is limited to private commercial and industrial lots. The proposed Project would include 24 bicycle parking spaces as well as bicycle access on the driveway.
TR10: Land Use Strategies
Consistent. This measure is a BAAQMD funding tool to maintain and disseminate information on current climate action plans and other local best practices and collaborate with regional partners to identify innovative funding mechanisms to help local governments address air quality and climate change in their general plans. In addition, the proposed Project site is located within 2,000 feet of transit stops at Westgate Parkway / Davis Street. Therefore, these employment opportunities would be easily accessible via transit, furthering the City’s General Plan goals to support a healthy community, reduce traffic congestion and decrease greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption. The Project would not conflict with implementation of this measure.
TR13: Parking Policies Consistent. The proposed Project would create approximately 204 new parking spaces. The proposed parking is sufficient for the proposed use.
TR19: Medium and Heavy Duty Trucks
Consistent. The Project includes a warehousing use that would generate truck trips. However, per the Transportation Impact Analysis (December 2022) prepared for the Project there would be approximately 47 daily truck trips. The Project would not conflict with the implementation of this measure.
TR22: Construction, Freight and
Farming Equipment
Consistent. The Project would comply through implementation of the BAAQMD standard condition, which requires construction equipment to be properly maintained.
Energy and Climate Control Measures
EN1: Decarbonize Electricity
Generation
Consistent. The Project would be constructed in accordance with the latest California Building Code and green building regulations/CalGreen.
The proposed development would be constructed in compliance with the City’s General Plan Policy 7-9.1 implementing Green Building Standards.
EN2: Decrease Electricity Demand
Buildings Control Measures
BL1: Green Buildings Consistent. The Project would be constructed in accordance with the latest California Building Code and green building regulations/CalGreen. L2: Decarbonize Buildings City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 21
Control Measure Project Consistency
BL4: Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Consistent. The Project would demolish the existing warehouse building. The Project would include landscaping to mitigate the urban heat island effect.
Natural and Working Lands Control Measures
NW2: Urban Tree Planting Not Applicable. The Project site includes existing warehouse building.
The Project includes landscaping with native vegetation and trees.
Waste Management Control Measures
WA1: Landfills Consistent. The waste service provider for the Project would be required to meet the AB 341 and SB 939, 1374, and 1383 requirements that require waste service providers to divert and recycle waste. Per Cal Green requirements the Project would recycle construction waste.
WA3: Green Waste Diversion
WA4: Recycling and Waste Reduction
Water Control Measures
WR2: Support Water Conservation
Consistent. The Project would implement water conservation measures and low flow fixtures as required by Title 24, CalGreen, and the City of San Leandro’s Municipal Code Chapter 3.22 Bay-Friendly Landscaping Requirements For City Projects, which includes various specifications for plant types, water features, and irrigation design etc.
Source: BAAQMD, Clean Air Plan, 2017 and Kimley-Horn & Associates, 2023.
The addition of new jobs as a result of the proposed Project would be within the ABAG growth projections for the City by 2040. Therefore, population growth from the Project would be consistent with ABAG’s projections for the City and the City’s General Plan. Thus, the Project would not exceed the assumptions in the General Plan or the Clean Air Plan.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact.
Threshold AQ-2: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Construction Emissions
Project construction activities would generate short-term emissions of criteria air pollutants. The criteria pollutants of primary concern within the Project area include ozone-precursor pollutants (i.e., ROG and NOX) and PM10 and PM2.5. Construction-generated emissions are short term and temporary, lasting only while construction activities occur, but would be considered a significant air quality impact if the volume of pollutants generated exceeds the BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance.
Construction results in the temporary generation of emissions during demolition, site preparation, site grading, road paving, motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips, and the movement of construction equipment, especially on unpaved surfaces. Emissions of airborne particulate matter are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities, as well as weather conditions and the appropriate application of water.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 22
The duration of construction activities associated with the Project are estimated to last approximately 17 months, beginning in March 2024 and concluding at the end of July 2025. The Project’s constructionrelated emissions were calculated using the BAAQMD-approved CalEEMod computer program, which is designed to model emissions for land use development projects, based on typical construction requirements. Project demolition and site preparation are anticipated to begin in March 2024 and last approximately two months. Project grading is anticipated to begin in May 2024 and last approximately one months and would import approximately 15,000 cubic yards (cy) of soil. Paving was modeled to be completed July 2025 and Architectural Coating to be completed in July 2025. The exact construction timeline is unknown; however, to be conservative, earlier dates were utilized in the modeling. This approach is conservative given that emissions factors decrease in future years due to regulatory and technological improvements and fleet turnover. See Appendix A for additional information regarding the construction assumptions used in this analysis. The Project’s predicted maximum daily constructionrelated emissions are summarized in Table 7: Construction-Related Emissions.
Table 7: Construction-Related Emissions
Construction Year
Pollutant (maximum pounds per day)1
Reactive
Organic
Gases
(ROG)
Nitrogen
Oxide
(NOx)
Exhaust Fugitive Dust
Coarse
Particulate
Matter
(PM10)
Fine
Particulate
Matter
(PM2.5)
Coarse
Particulate
Matter
(PM10)
Fine
Particulate
Matter
(PM2.5)
2024 3.36 37.60 1.39 1.30 8.54 4.36
2025 43.72 18.51 0.62 0.59 3.23 0.88
Maximum 43.72 37.60 1.39 1.30 8.54 4.36
BAAQMD Significance
Threshold 2, 3 54 54 82 54 BMPs BMPs
Exceed BAAQMD
Threshold? No No No No N/A N/A
1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod 2020.4.0. Mitigated emissions include compliance with the BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures Recommended for All Projects and the City of San José Environmental Standard Conditions. These measures include the following: water exposed surfaces two times daily; cover haul trucks; clean track outs with wet powered vacuum street sweepers; limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour; complete paving as soon as possible after grading; limit idle times to 5 minutes; properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; and post a publicly visible sign with contact information to register dust complaints and take corrective action within 48 hours.
2. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines, updated May 2017.
3. BMPs = Best Management Practices. The BAAQMD recommends the implementation of all Basic Construction Mitigation Measures, whether or not construction-related emissions exceed applicable significance thresholds. Implementation of Basic Construction Mitigation measures are considered to mitigate fugitive dust emissions to be less than significant.
Source: Refer to the CalEEMod outputs provided in Appendix A.
Fugitive Dust Emissions. Fugitive dust emissions are associated with land clearing, ground excavation, cutand-fill operations, demolition, and truck travel on unpaved roadways. Dust emissions also vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific operations, and weather conditions. Fugitive dust emissions may have a substantial, temporary impact on local air quality. In addition, fugitive dust may be a nuisance to those living and working in the Project vicinity. Uncontrolled dust from construction can become a nuisance and potential health hazard to those living and working nearby. The BAAQMD recommends the implementation of all Basic Construction Control Measures, whether or not construction-related emissions exceed applicable significance.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 23
Construction Equipment and Worker Vehicle Exhaust. Exhaust emission factors for typical diesel-powered heavy equipment are based on the CalEEMod program defaults. Variables factored into estimating the total construction emissions include: level of activity, length of construction period, number of pieces/types of equipment in use, site characteristics, weather conditions, number of construction personnel, and the amount of materials to be transported onsite or offsite. Exhaust emissions from construction activities include emissions associated with the transport of machinery and supplies to and from the Project site, emissions produced on site as the equipment is used, and emissions from trucks transporting materials and workers to and from the site. Emitted pollutants would include ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5. The BAAQMD recommends the implementation of all Basic Construction Control Measures, whether or not construction-related emissions exceed applicable significance thresholds. As detailed in Table 7, Project construction emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD thresholds and construction emissions would not result in a potentially significant impact.
ROG Emissions. In addition to gaseous and particulate emissions, the application of asphalt and surface coatings creates ROG emissions, which are O3 precursors. In accordance with the methodology prescribed by the BAAQMD, the ROG emissions associated with paving have been quantified with CalEEMod. The highest concentration of ROG emissions would be generated from architectural coating beginning in Summer 2025 and lasting approximately three months. This phase includes the interior and exterior painting as well as striping of all paved parking areas and driveways. Paints would be required to comply with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3: Architectural Coating. Regulation 8, Rule 3 provides specifications on painting practices and regulates the ROG content of paint.
Summary. As shown in Table 7, all criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds. BAAQMD considers fugitive dust emissions to be potentially significant without implementation of the Construction Control Measures which help control fugitive dust. NOX emissions are primarily generated by engine combustion in construction equipment, haul trucks, and employee commuting, requiring the use of newer construction equipment with better emissions controls would reduce construction-related NOX emissions. With implementation of BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Control Measures, the proposed Project’s construction would not worsen ambient air quality, create additional violations of federal and state standards, or delay the Basin’s goal for meeting attainment standards. Impacts would be less than significant.
Operational Emissions
Operational emissions for industrial developments are typically generated from mobile sources (burning of fossil fuels in cars); energy sources (cooling and heating); and area sources (landscape equipment and household products). Table 8: Maximum Daily Project Operational Emissions shows that the Project's maximum emissions would not exceed BAAQMD operational thresholds.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 24
Table 8: Maximum Daily Project Operational Emissions
Emissions Source
Pollutant (maximum pounds per day)1
Reactive
Organic
Gases
(ROG)
Nitrogen
Oxides
(NOX)
Exhaust Fugitive Dust
Coarse
Particulate
Matter
(PM10)
Fine
Particulate
Matter
(PM2.5)
Coarse
Particulate
Matter
(PM10)
Fine
Particulate
Matter
(PM2.5)
Area 6.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy 0.19 1.72 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00
Mobile 1.88 18.96 0.22 0.21 13.75 3.67
Generators 3.38 9.42 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00
Off-Road Equipment 1.10 8.58 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00
Total Project Emissions 12.69 38.68 1.00 0.97 13.75 3.67 BAAQMD Significance
Threshold2 54 54 82 54 N/A N/A
BAAQMD Threshold
Exceeded? No No No No N/A N/A
1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod 2020.4.0.
2. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines, 2017.
Source: Refer to the CalEEMod outputs provided in Appendix A Area Source Emissions Area source emissions would be generated due to the use consumer products, architectural coating, and landscaping.
Energy Source Emissions. Energy source emissions would be generated as a result of electricity and natural gas usage associated with the Project. The primary use of electricity and natural gas by the Project would be for space heating and cooling, water heating, ventilation, lighting, appliances, and electronics.
Mobile Sources. Mobile sources are emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions. Depending upon the pollutant being discussed, the potential air quality impact may be of either regional or local concern. For example, ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5 are all pollutants of regional concern (NOX and ROG react with sunlight to form O3 [photochemical smog], and wind currents readily transport PM10 and PM2.5). However, CO tends to be a localized pollutant, dispersing rapidly at the source.
Project-generated vehicle emissions have been estimated using CalEEMod. Trip generation rates associated with the Project were based on the Project Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by KimleyHorn (December 2022). Based on the Transportation Impact Analysis, the Project would result in a total of 1,579 new daily vehicle trips. This includes 1,532 auto trips, and 47 heavy-duty truck trips.
Total Operational Emissions. As indicated in Table 8, Project operational emissions would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds. As noted above, the BAAQMD has set its CEQA significance threshold based on the trigger levels for the federal NSR Program and BAAQMD’s Regulation 2, Rule 2 for new or modified sources. The NSR Program was created to ensure projects are consistent with attainment of health-based federal ambient air quality standards. The federal ambient air quality standards establish the levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health. Therefore, the Project would not violate any air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation and no criteria pollutant health impacts would occur. Project operational emissions would be less than significant.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 25
Cumulative Short-Term Emissions
The SFBAAB is designated nonattainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 for State standards and nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5 for Federal standards. As in Table 7, the Project’s construction-related emissions by themselves would not have the potential to exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for any of the criteria pollutants. The BAAQMD developed the construction thresholds of significance based on the level above which a project’s individual emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the Basin’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the BAAQMD thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact.2 Project-related construction emissions would not be cumulatively considerable because they do not exceed BAAQMD project level thresholds. Since BAAQMD thresholds indicate whether an individual project’s emissions have the potential to affect cumulative regional air quality, it can be expected that an individual project that exceeds these thresholds would result in a cumulative short-term impact. Project level cumulative construction emissions would not exceed threshold. Furthermore, the BAAQMD recommends Basic Construction Mitigation Measures for all projects whether construction-related emissions exceed the thresholds of significance. Other projects would comply with the recommended measures through individual CEQA review and through compliance with BAAQMD Regulations.
Compliance with BAAQMD construction-related mitigation requirements are considered to reduce cumulative impacts at a Basin-wide level. As a result, construction emissions associated with the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts.
Cumulative Long-Term Impacts
The BAAQMD has not established separate significance thresholds for cumulative operational emissions.
The nature of air emissions is largely a cumulative impact. As a result, no single project is sufficient in size, by itself, to result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. The BAAQMD developed the operational thresholds of significance based on the level above which a project’s individual emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the Basin’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the BAAQMD operational thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact.
As shown in Table 8, the Project’s operational emissions would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds. As a result, operational emissions associated with the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact with compliance with BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Control Measures and City policies.
2 In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, BAAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. If a project exceeds the identified significance thresholds, its emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions (BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines page 2-1).
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 26
Threshold AQ-3: Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Sensitive land uses are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses.
Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The State CEQA Guidelines indicate that a potentially significant impact could occur if a project would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Construction Toxic Air Contaminants
Construction equipment and associated heavy-duty truck traffic generates diesel exhaust which is a known Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC). Diesel exhaust from construction equipment operating at the site poses a health risk to nearby sensitive receptors. However, the use of diesel-powered construction equipment would be episodic and would occur in various phases throughout the Project site. Construction is subject to and would comply with California regulations (e.g., California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 3, Article 1, Chapter 10, Sections 2485 and 2449), which reduce DPM and criteria pollutant emissions from in-use off-road diesel-fueled vehicles and limit the idling of heavy-duty construction equipment to no more than five minutes. These regulations would further reduce nearby sensitive receptors’ exposure to temporary and variable DPM emissions.
As noted in the Health Risk Assessment (HRA) prepared by Kimley-Horn (2023), maximum (worst case) PM2.5 exhaust construction emissions over the entire construction period were used in AERMOD to approximate construction DPM emissions. See the HRA for additional methodology on the modeling analysis. Risk levels were calculated with the CARB Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP) Risk Assessment Standalone Tool (RAST) based on the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidance document, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines (February 2015). Results of this assessment are summarized in Table 9: Construction Risk.
Table 9: Construction Risk
Exposure Scenarios
Pollutant Concentration
(µg/m3)
Cancer Risk
(per million) Chronic Hazard Acute Hazard
Worker 0.028 0.91 0.006 0.219
Recreation 0.001 0.07 <0.001 0.037
Resident 0.004 0.53 0.001 0.071
BAAQMD Threshold 0.3 10 1.0 1.0
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Refer to Appendix A.
Maximum concentration of PM2.5 during construction would be 0.028 μg/m3, which would not exceed the BAAQMD threshold of 0.3 μg/m3
. The highest calculated carcinogenic risk from Project construction would be 0.91 per one million for workers, 0.07 per million for recreation, and 0.53 per million for residents which would all be below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 in one million. The maximally exposed individuals (MEI) during construction are the closest sensitive receptors to the Project site, which are the residences 500 feet northeast of the Project site, the Metropolitan Golf Links Course 700 feet west of the Project site, and employees at nearby businesses (see sensitive receptor #1 in Figure 4). Non-cancer hazards for DPM City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 27
would be below BAAQMD thresholds, with a chronic hazard index computed at 0.006 and an acute hazard index of 0.219. Acute and chronic hazards would be below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 1.0. As described above, worst-case construction risk levels based on screening-level modeling (AERMOD) and conservative assumptions would be below the BAAQMD’s thresholds for construction and construction risk levels would be less than significant.
Operational Health Risk Analysis
The Project includes the construction of one industrial building. According to the Transportation Impact Analysis (December 2022) prepared by Kimley-Horn, the Project would include passenger vehicles and trucks. The Project is anticipated to generate 1,579 new daily trips. Of which, the Project would generate 47 truck trips. As shown in Table 10: Operational Risk Assessment Results, the calculated carcinogenic risk resulting from the Project is 0.31 per million for workers, 0.15 per million for recreation, and 0.11 per million for residents which are all below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million. Acute and chronic hazards also would be below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 1.0. Operational impacts would be less than significant.
Table 10: Operational Risk Assessment Results
Exposure Scenario
Pollutant
Concentration
(μg/m3)
Maximum Cancer Risk
(Risk per Million) Chronic Noncancer
Hazard
Acute Noncancer
Hazard
Worker 0.006 0.31 0.0002 0.021
Recreation 0.003 0.15 0.0002 0.011
Resident 0.002 0.11 0.0001 0.005
Threshold NA 10 in one million 1.0 1.0
Exceed Threshold? No No No No
Refer to Appendix A.
1. The maximum cancer would be experienced for workers based on worst-case exposure durations for the Project, 95th percentile breathing rates, and 30-year averaging time.
The pollutant concentrations modeled in AERMOD represent the exposure levels outdoors. The BAAQMD conservatively does not include indoor exposure adjustments for residents. However, the typical person spends the majority of time indoors rather than remaining outdoors in the same location for 24 hours a day.3 Therefore, the AERMOD outdoor pollutant concentrations are not necessarily representative of actual exposure at the Project site, and tend to overestimate exposure.
Cumulative Health Risk Analysis
In addition to mobile sources, stationary sources within a 1,000-foot radius of the Project site were reviewed using BAAQMD’s Stationary Source Screening Analysis Tools. There were two stationary sources located within a 1,000-foot radius of the Project site, as indicated in Table 11: Cumulative Operational Health Risk.
3 California Air Resources Board Research Division and University of California, Berkeley, Activity Patterns of California Residents, May 1991.
The study indicates that on average, adults and adolescents in California spent almost 15 hours per day inside their homes, and 6 hours in other indoor locations, for a total of 21 hours (87% of the day). Approximately two hours per day were spent in transit, and just over one hour per day was spent in outdoor locations.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 28
Table 11: Cumulative Operational Health Risk
Emissions Sources PM2.5 (µg/m3)
Cancer Risk
(per million Hazard
Project Mobile Emissions 0.002 0.11 0.0003
Major Street Sources1 0.024 1.07 0.096
Highway Sources1 0.190 11.55 0.840
Railway Sources1 0.008 5.48 0.032
Stationary Sources
California General Partnership 0.000 0.10 0.000
PCC Structural 0.374 3.30 0.382
Cumulative Health Risk Values 0.618 22.61 1.350
BAAQMD Cumulative Threshold 0.8 100 10
Threshold Exceeded? No No No
1. BAAQMD GIS data.
Source: BAAQMD’s Stationary Source Data and GIS Mapping Tools, 2021.
As described above in Table 11, cumulative impacts related to cancer risk and hazard would be less than cumulatively considerable and within acceptable limits. Additionally, cumulative residential PM2.5 would not exceed the BAAQMD’s cumulative threshold of 0.8 µg/m3 . The primary contributor to those
concentrations is the existing PCC Structural manufacturing site near the Project area. The facility has a PM2.5 (0.374 µg/m3). The PCC Structural facility source represent approximately 60 percent of the total concentrations and are completely unrelated to the Project. The Project represents less than 0.17 percent of total cumulative PM 2.5 in the Project area. Therefore, the Project’s cumulative impacts would be less than significant.
Carbon Monoxide Hotspots
The primary mobile-source criteria pollutant of local concern is carbon monoxide. Concentrations of CO are a direct function of the number of vehicles, length of delay, and traffic flow conditions. Transport of this criteria pollutant is extremely limited; CO disperses rapidly with distance from the source under normal meteorological conditions. Under certain meteorological conditions, however, CO concentrations close to congested intersections that experience high levels of traffic and elevated background concentrations may reach unhealthy levels, affecting nearby sensitive receptors. Areas of high CO concentrations, or “hot spots,” are typically associated with intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable levels of service during the peak commute hours. CO concentration modeling is therefore typically conducted for intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable levels of service during peak commute hours.
The Basin is designated as in attainment for carbon monoxide (CO). Emissions and ambient concentrations of CO have decreased dramatically in the Basin with the introduction of the catalytic converter in 1975.
No exceedances of the CAAQS or NAAQS for CO have been recorded at nearby monitoring stations since 1991. As a result, the BAAQMD screening criteria notes that CO impacts may be determined to be less than significant if a project would not increase traffic volumes at local intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour, or 24,000 vehicles per hour for locations in heavily urban areas, where “urban canyons” City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 29
formed by buildings tend to reduce air circulation. Traffic would increase along surrounding roadways during long-term operational activities.
According to the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the Project (December 2022), the Project would generate 1,579 daily trips. The Project’s effects to existing vehicle distribution and travel speeds would be nominal. For the cumulative plus project scenario analyzed in the traffic analysis, the highest peak hour intersection would be approximately 5,500 vehicles per hour. Therefore, the Project would not involve intersections with more than 44,000 vehicles per hour. As a result, the Project would not have the potential to create a CO hotspot and impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact.
Threshold AQ-4: Would the Project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Construction
Construction activities associated with the Project may generate detectable odors from heavy duty equipment (i.e., diesel exhaust), as well as from architectural coatings and asphalt off-gassing. Odors generated from the referenced sources are common in the man-made environment and are not known to be substantially offensive to adjacent receptors. Any construction-related odors would be short-term in nature and cease upon Project completion. As a result, impacts to existing adjacent land uses from construction-related odors would be short-term in duration and therefore would be less than significant.
Operational
BAAQMD has established odor screening thresholds for land uses that have the potential to generate substantial odor complaints, including wastewater treatment plants, landfills or transfer stations, composting facilities, confined animal facilities, food manufacturing, and chemical plants. BAAQMD’s thresholds for odors are qualitative based on BAAQMD’s Regulation 7, Odorous Substances. This rule places general limitations on odorous substances and specific emission limitations on certain odorous compounds.
The Project includes a 245,200 sf warehouse building which is not anticipated to generate odors. None of the above listed odor generating uses are located near the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: Compliance with General Plan Policies and applicable state and local law would reduce impacts associated with odors to a less than significant level. No additional site-specific mitigation measures are required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 30
5.2 CUMULATIVE SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES Cumulative Setting
The cumulative setting for air quality includes the City and the Air Basin. The Air Basin is designated as a nonattainment area for state standards of ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 and federal standards of ozone and PM2.5, attainment and serious maintenance for federal PM10 standards, and is designated as unclassified or attainment for all other pollutants. Cumulative growth in population and vehicle use could inhibit efforts to improve regional air quality and attain the ambient air quality standards.
Cumulative Impacts and Mitigation Measures
The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines do not include separate significance thresholds for cumulative operational emissions. However, with respect to regional air pollution, the development of the Project would result in population growth that is consistent with ABAG projections and the City General Plan.
Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan that uses ABAG population forecasts.
As described in threshold AQ-1 above, the Project would also be consistent with the appropriate 2017 Clean Air Plan control measures, which are provided to reduce air quality emissions for the entire Bay Area region. Additionally, the discussion in threshold AQ-2 and AQ-3 address cumulative impacts and demonstrate that the Project would not exceed the applicable BAAQMD thresholds for construction or operations with implementation of Standard Development Requirements. Threshold AQ-4 describes that the Project would not generate emissions that produce a substantial odor. The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines note that the nature of air emissions is largely a cumulative impact. As a result, no single project is sufficient in size by itself to result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts.
Consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan control measures would ensure that the Project would not cumulatively contribute to air quality impacts in the Basin. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Air Quality Assessment
November 2023
Page | 31
6 REFERENCES
1. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Planning Healthy Places, 2016.
2. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, 2017.
3. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Clean Air Plan, 2017.
4. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status, 2017.
5. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Current Rules, 2017.
6. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Health Effects, 2018.
7. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, 2009.
8. California Air Resources Board, Aerometric Data Analysis and Measurement System (ADAM) Top Four Summaries from 2015 to 2017, 2018.
9. California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, 2005.
10. California Air Resources Board, Current Air Quality Standards, 2016.
11. California Air Resources Board, Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles, 2000.
12. City of San Leandro, 2035 General Plan, 2016.
13. City of San Leandro, Municipal Code, 2022.
14. Federal Highway Administration, Interim Guidance on Mobile Source Air Toxic Analysis in NEPA Documents, 2016.
15. Kimley-Horn & Associates, 880 Doolittle Drive Project Transportation Impact Analysis, December 2022.
16. MS Testing Services, Asbestos Survey Report, February 2021.
17. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines, 2015.
18. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Ambient Air Quality Standards Table, 2016.
19. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants, 2018.
20. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Policy Assessment for the Review of the Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 2013.
Appendix A
Air Quality Modeling Data
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - Per AB 393Fleet Mix - antcipated fleet mixOff-road Equipment - crushing and reusing all materials onsiteConstruction Phase - Anticipated construction scheduleDemolition - Grading - Vehicle Trips - Per transportation analysisConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - BAAQMD rule compliance N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.004
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Land Use -
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033
Precipitation Freq (Days) 63
Climate Zone 4 Operational Year 2025
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2
0 Parking Lot 401.79 1000sqft 9.22 401,790.00 0
Manufacturing 245.20 1000sqft 5.63 245,200.00
880 Doolittle Project
Alameda County, Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.57 0.00tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.01 1.00tblFleetMix LDA 0.57 1.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/29/2024 5/2/2024
tblFleetMix HHD 0.01 0.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/12/2024 7/1/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/18/2025 6/3/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/15/2025 5/1/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/24/2024 9/3/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/14/2025 7/31/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/11/2024 6/28/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/28/2024 5/1/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/23/2024 9/2/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/11/2025 7/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/17/2025 6/2/2025tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 42.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 44.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 46.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 66.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 195.00
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 Off-road Equipment -
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 13.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 0.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 28.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 65.50
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Generator Sets tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes tblFleetMix UBUS 5.6000e-004 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 15,000.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 3.4300e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 5.6000e-004 0.00tblFleetMix OBUS 7.9000e-004 0.00tblFleetMix SBUS 3.4300e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 7.9000e-004 0.00tblFleetMix MH 2.4230e-003 0.00tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 2.4230e-003 0.00tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.2110e-003 0.00tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LHD2 5.2110e-003 0.00tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Maximum 1.5187 3.0726 2.7774 7.8500e-003 1.1573 0.1162 1.2735 0.3982 0.1080 0.5062 0.0000 714.7053 714.7053 0.1207 0.0385 729.1974 386.3891 386.3891 0.0482 0.0188 393.1834
0.1207 0.0385 729.1974
2025 1.5187 1.1797 1.6545 4.2400e-003 0.1718 0.0416 0.2134 0.0466 0.0391 0.0857 0.00002024 0.3010 3.0726 2.7774 7.8500e-003 1.1573 0.1162 1.2735 0.3982 0.1080 0.5062 0.0000 714.7053 714.7053 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 6.25tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.12tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 6.25tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 0.12tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 6.25tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 0.12tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 0.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 100.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
Highest 1.2305 1.2305
6 6-1-2025 8-31-2025 1.1594 1.15945 3-1-2025 5-31-2025 1.1164 1.11644 12-1-2024 2-28-2025 0.6492 0.64923 9-1-2024 11-30-2024 0.6921 0.69212 6-1-2024 8-31-2024 1.2057 1.20571 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.2305 1.2305 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.52 0.00 38.90 46.01 0.00 34.57 0.00
0.1207 0.0385 729.1969
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2
Maximum 1.5187 3.0726 2.7774 7.8500e-003 0.5874 0.1162 0.7036 0.1957 0.1080 0.3037 0.0000 714.7048 714.7048 386.3888 386.3888 0.0482 0.0188 393.1832
0.1207 0.0385 729.1969
2025 1.5187 1.1797 1.6545 4.2400e-003 0.1633 0.0416 0.2049 0.0445 0.0391 0.0836 0.0000 2024 0.3010 3.0726 2.7774 7.8500e-003 0.5874 0.1162 0.7036 0.1957 0.1080 0.3037 0.0000 714.7048 714.7048 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.3913 22.7103 37.1016 1.4818 0.0354 84.6799
0.0000 30.8597 1.8238 0.0000 76.4536
0.0667 0.2752 2,904.0914
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 30.8597Mobile 0.3020 3.6011 4.7322 0.0293 2.4117 0.0400 2.4517 0.6455 0.0380 0.6835 0.0000 2,820.4217 2,820.4217 539.3348 539.3348 0.0384 0.0101 543.3162
3.0000e005 0.0000 0.0123
Energy 0.0346 0.3147 0.2643 1.8900e-003 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000
2.0000e005 0.0000 2.0000e- 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0116 0.0116 005 Area 1.1204 5.0000e-005 5.9300e- 2.0000e-005 003 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
3,388.1560 3,467.8645 5.6049 0.3295 3,706.1770
1.8522 0.0442 105.8498
Total 1.4570 3.9158 5.0025 0.0312 2.4117 0.0640 2.4757 0.6455 0.0619 0.7075 79.7085 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 17.9891 28.3879 46.3770
0.0000 61.7194 3.6475 0.0000 152.9072
0.0667 0.2752 2,904.0914
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 61.7194Mobile 0.3020 3.6011 4.7322 0.0293 2.4117 0.0400 2.4517 0.6455 0.0380 0.6835 0.0000 2,820.4217 2,820.4217 539.3348 539.3348 0.0384 0.0101 543.3162
3.0000e005 0.0000 0.0123
Energy 0.0346 0.3147 0.2643 1.8900e-003 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000
2.0000e005 0.0000 2.0000e- 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0116 0.0116 005 Area 1.1204 5.0000e-005 5.9300e- 2.0000e-005 003 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 Acres of Paving: 9.22
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 367,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 122,600; Striped Parking Area: 24,107 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 66
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 63
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 138
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/1/2025 7/31/2025 5 195
5 Paving Paving 6/3/2025 7/31/2025 5 434 Building Construction Building Construction 9/3/2024 6/2/2025 5 42
3 Grading Grading 7/1/2024 9/2/2024 5 462 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/2/2024 6/28/2024 Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2024 5/1/2024 5 44
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date
39.15 2.68 2.63
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.23 0.17 1.16 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2
Total 1.4570 3.9158 5.0025 0.0312 2.4117 0.0640 2.4757 0.6455 0.0619 0.7075 45.2510 3,382.4784 3,427.7294 3.4107 0.3207 3,608.5534 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 272.00 106.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 8 20.00 0.00 1,875.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling Vehicle
Class
Demolition 9 23.00 0.00 3,283.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
0.37 Demolition Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97
0.48 Demolition Other Construction Equipment 1 8.00 172 0.42Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367
0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80
0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130
0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97
0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89
0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97
0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Graders 1 8.00 187
0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
105.1884 105.1884 0.0272 0.0000 105.8693
0.0272 0.0000 105.8693
Total 0.0661 0.6178 0.6516 1.2000e-003 0.3552 0.0287 0.3839 0.0538 0.0268 0.0806 0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road 0.0661 0.6178 0.6516 1.2000e-003 0.0287 0.0287 0.0268 0.0268 0.0000 105.1884 105.1884
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.3552 0.0000 0.3552 0.0538 0.0000 0.0538 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved RoadsClean Paved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground CoverWater Exposed AreaWater Unpaved Roads Architectural Coating 1 54.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhaust CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0272 0.0000 105.8692
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.0661 0.6178 0.6516 1.2000e-003 0.1519 0.0287 0.1805 0.0230 0.0268 0.0498 0.0000 105.1882 105.1882 105.1882 105.1882 0.0272 0.0000 105.8692
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0661 0.6178 0.6516 1.2000e-003 0.0287 0.0287 0.0268 0.0268 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.1519 0.0000 0.1519 0.0230 0.0000 0.0230 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
97.3240 97.3240 2.1200e003 0.0150 101.8395
8.0000e005 8.0000e- 005 3.1028
Total 4.6200e003 0.2175 0.0597 9.9000e-004 0.0318 1.8800e- 003 0.0337 8.7200e- 003 1.8000e- 003 0.0105 0.0000
2.0000e005 3.0000e-005 4.0000e- 1.0800e-003 0.0000 3.0764 3.0764 003 2.0000e- 005 4.0200e-003 1.0600e- 003 Worker 1.2400e- 003 8.1000e- 004 0.0105
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.0400e003 0.0149 98.7367
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1.7800e003 9.6000e-004 0.0278 1.8600e- 9.4300e-003 0.0000 94.2476 94.2476 003 0.0297 7.6600e- 003 Hauling 3.3800e- 003 0.2166 0.0492 Category tons/yr MT/yr
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhaust CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0227 0.0000 70.8279
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.0559 0.5707 0.3851 8.0000e-004 0.4128 0.0258 0.4386 0.2122 0.0238 0.2359 0.0000 70.2598 70.2598
70.2598 70.2598 0.0227 0.0000 70.8279
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0559 0.5707 0.3851 8.0000e-004 0.0258 0.0258 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.4128 0.0000 0.4128 0.2122 0.0000 0.2122 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
97.3240 97.3240 2.1200e003 0.0150 101.8395
8.0000e005 8.0000e- 005 3.1028
Total 4.6200e003 0.2175 0.0597 9.9000e-004 0.0304 1.8800e- 003 0.0322 8.3600e- 003 1.8000e- 003 0.0102 0.0000
2.0000e005 3.0000e-005 3.7900e- 1.0300e-003 0.0000 3.0764 3.0764 003 2.0000e- 005 3.8100e-003 1.0100e- 003 Worker 1.2400e- 003 8.1000e- 004 0.0105
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.0400e003 0.0149 98.7367
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1.7800e003 9.6000e-004 0.0266 1.8600e- 9.1200e-003 0.0000 94.2476 94.2476 003 0.0284 7.3500e- 003 Hauling 3.3800e- 003 0.2166 0.0492 Category tons/yr MT/yr
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhaust CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0227 0.0000 70.8278
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.0559 0.5707 0.3851 8.0000e-004 0.1765 0.0258 0.2023 0.0907 0.0238 0.1144 0.0000 70.2598 70.2598
70.2598 70.2598 0.0227 0.0000 70.8278
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0559 0.5707 0.3851 8.0000e-004 0.0258 0.0258 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.1765 0.0000 0.1765 0.0907 0.0000 0.0907 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2.2982 2.2982 6.0000e005 6.0000e- 005 2.3179
6.0000e005 6.0000e- 005 2.3179
Total 9.2000e004 6.1000e- 004 7.8700e-003 2.0000e-005 2.9900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e-003 8.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.1000e-004 0.0000
1.0000e005 2.0000e-005 2.9900e- 8.1000e-004 0.0000 2.2982 2.2982 003 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e-003 8.0000e- 004 Worker 9.2000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 7.8700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhaust CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0406 0.0000 126.4088
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.0740 0.7447 0.6376 1.4300e-003 0.2125 0.0307 0.2432 0.0842 0.0283 0.1124 0.0000 125.3949 125.3949 125.3949 125.3949 0.0406 0.0000 126.4088
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0740 0.7447 0.6376 1.4300e-003 0.0307 0.0307 0.0283 0.0283 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.2125 0.0000 0.2125 0.0842 0.0000 0.0842 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.4 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2.2982 2.2982 6.0000e005 6.0000e- 005 2.3179
6.0000e005 6.0000e- 005 2.3179
Total 9.2000e004 6.1000e- 004 7.8700e-003 2.0000e-005 2.8300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.8500e-003 7.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e-004 0.0000
1.0000e005 2.0000e-005 2.8300e- 7.7000e-004 0.0000 2.2982 2.2982 003 1.0000e- 005 2.8500e-003 7.6000e- 004 Worker 9.2000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 7.8700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhaust CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0406 0.0000 126.4086
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.0740 0.7447 0.6376 1.4300e-003 0.0909 0.0307 0.1216 0.0360 0.0283 0.0642 0.0000 125.3948 125.3948 125.3948 125.3948 0.0406 0.0000 126.4086
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0740 0.7447 0.6376 1.4300e-003 0.0307 0.0307 0.0283 0.0283 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.0909 0.0000 0.0909 0.0360 0.0000 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
56.6238 56.6238 1.2500e003 8.5800e- 003 59.2116
8.0000e005 7.0000e- 005 2.8208
Total 3.0500e003 0.1245 0.0377 5.8000e-004 0.0195 1.0800e- 003 0.0206 5.3400e- 003 1.0300e- 003 6.3700e-003 0.0000
2.0000e005 3.0000e-005 3.6400e- 9.8000e-004 0.0000 2.7967 2.7967 003 2.0000e- 005 3.6600e-003 9.7000e- 004 Worker 1.1200e- 003 7.4000e- 004 9.5800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1.1700e003 8.5100e- 003 56.3909
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1.0100e003 5.5000e-004 0.0159 1.0600e- 5.3900e-003 0.0000 53.8271 53.8271 003 0.0170 4.3700e- 003 Hauling 1.9300e- 003 0.1237 0.0281 Category tons/yr MT/yr
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
99.6951 99.6951 0.0236 0.0000 100.2845
0.0236 0.0000 100.2845
Total 0.0633 0.5781 0.6952 1.1600e-003 0.0264 0.0264 0.0248 0.0248 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0633 0.5781 0.6952 1.1600e-003 0.0264 0.0264 0.0248 0.0248 0.0000 99.6951 99.6951 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
56.6238 56.6238 1.2500e003 8.5800e- 003 59.2116
8.0000e005 7.0000e- 005 2.8208
Total 3.0500e003 0.1245 0.0377 5.8000e-004 0.0186 1.0800e- 003 0.0197 5.1200e- 003 1.0300e- 003 6.1500e-003 0.0000
2.0000e005 3.0000e-005 3.4500e- 9.4000e-004 0.0000 2.7967 2.7967 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4700e-003 9.2000e- 004 Worker 1.1200e- 003 7.4000e- 004 9.5800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1.1700e003 8.5100e- 003 56.3909
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1.0100e003 5.5000e-004 0.0152 1.0600e- 5.2100e-003 0.0000 53.8271 53.8271 003 0.0162 4.2000e- 003 Hauling 1.9300e- 003 0.1237 0.0281 Category tons/yr MT/yr
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
99.6950 99.6950 0.0236 0.0000 100.2844
0.0236 0.0000 100.2844
Total 0.0633 0.5781 0.6952 1.1600e-003 0.0264 0.0264 0.0248 0.0248 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0633 0.5781 0.6952 1.1600e-003 0.0264 0.0264 0.0248 0.0248 0.0000 99.6950 99.6950 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
157.9210 157.9210 3.1500e003 0.0149 162.4378
1.9500e003 1.8900e- 003 71.7209
Total 0.0331 0.2188 0.3027 1.6600e-003 0.1224 1.6700e003 0.1241 0.0333 1.5800e- 003 0.0348 0.0000
4.2000e004 7.6000e-004 0.0925 4.6000e- 0.0250 0.0000 71.1101 71.1101 004 Worker 0.0286 0.0187 0.2436 0.0929 0.0246
86.8109 86.8109 1.2000e003 0.0130 90.7169
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 4.5000e003 0.2001 0.0591 9.0000e-004 0.0299 1.2100e- 003 0.0312 8.6600e- 003 1.1600e- 003 9.8200e-003 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 108.0674 108.0674 1.5200e003 0.0162 112.9324
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 5.5800e003 0.2534 0.0737 1.1200e-003 0.0380 1.5400e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.4700e- 003 0.0125 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
126.3961 126.3961 0.0297 0.0000 127.1389
0.0297 0.0000 127.1389
Total 0.0745 0.6796 0.8766 1.4700e-003 0.0288 0.0288 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0745 0.6796 0.8766 1.4700e-003 0.0288 0.0288 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 126.3961 126.3961 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
157.9210 157.9210 3.1500e003 0.0149 162.4378
1.9500e003 1.8900e- 003 71.7209
Total 0.0331 0.2188 0.3027 1.6600e-003 0.1164 1.6700e003 0.1180 0.0318 1.5800e- 003 0.0334 0.0000
4.2000e004 7.6000e-004 0.0877 4.6000e- 0.0239 0.0000 71.1101 71.1101 004 Worker 0.0286 0.0187 0.2436 0.0881 0.0234
86.8109 86.8109 1.2000e003 Vendor 4.5000e- 0.0130 90.7169 003 0.2001 0.0591 9.0000e-004 0.0287 1.2100e- 003 0.0299 8.3500e- 003 1.1600e- 003 9.5100e-003 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2400e003 2.2400e- 003 5.1000e- 88.6940 004 9.3000e-004 0.1111 5.6000e- 0.0302 0.0000 87.9697 87.9697 004 Worker 0.0340 0.0214 0.2899 0.1117 0.0297 108.0674 108.0674 1.5200e003 0.0162 112.9324
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 5.5800e003 0.2534 0.0737 1.1200e-003 0.0364 1.5400e- 003 0.0379 0.0106 1.4700e- 003 0.0121 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
126.3960 126.3960 0.0297 0.0000 127.1388
0.0297 0.0000 127.1388
Total 0.0745 0.6796 0.8766 1.4700e-003 0.0288 0.0288 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0745 0.6796 0.8766 1.4700e-003 0.0288 0.0288 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 126.3960 126.3960 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
196.0371 196.0371 3.7600e003 0.0184 201.6263
2.2400e003 2.2400e- 003 88.6940
Total 0.0396 0.2748 0.3636 2.0500e-003 0.1552 2.1000e003 0.1573 0.0422 1.9800e- 003 0.0441 0.0000
5.1000e004 9.3000e-004 0.1172 5.6000e- 0.0317 0.0000 87.9697 87.9697 004 Worker 0.0340 0.0214 0.2899 0.1178 0.0312 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 1.9296 005 2.0000e-005 2.5500e- 6.9000e-004 0.0000 1.9138 1.9138 003 1.0000e- 005 2.5600e-003 6.8000e- 004 Worker 7.4000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 6.3100e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0139 0.0000 43.3894
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
8.2800e003 4.9000e-004 9.0000e- 8.2800e-003 0.0000 43.0414 43.0414 003 Total 0.0318 0.1845 0.3134 9.0000e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0139 0.0000 43.3894
Paving 0.0121 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
8.2800e003 4.9000e-004 9.0000e- 8.2800e-003 0.0000 43.0414 43.0414 003 Off-Road 0.0197 0.1845 0.3134 9.0000e-003 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
196.0371 196.0371 3.7600e003 Total 0.0396 0.2748 0.3636 2.0500e-003 0.1475 2.1000e- 0.0184 201.6263 003 0.1496 0.0403 1.9800e- 003 0.0423 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 1.9296 005 2.0000e-005 2.4200e- 6.6000e-004 0.0000 1.9138 1.9138 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4300e-003 6.5000e- 004 Worker 7.4000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 6.3100e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0139 0.0000 43.3894
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
8.2800e003 4.9000e-004 9.0000e- 8.2800e-003 0.0000 43.0414 43.0414 003 Total 0.0318 0.1845 0.3134 9.0000e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0139 0.0000 43.3894
Paving 0.0121 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
8.2800e003 4.9000e-004 9.0000e- 8.2800e-003 0.0000 43.0414 43.0414 003 Off-Road 0.0197 0.1845 0.3134 9.0000e-003 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
1.9138 1.9138 5.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 Total 7.4000e- 1.9296 004 4.7000e- 004 6.3100e-003 2.0000e-005 2.5500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.5600e-003 6.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.9000e-004 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 6.0000e- 10.6619 005 1.1000e-004 0.0141 7.0000e- 3.8100e-003 0.0000 10.5749 10.5749 005 0.0142 3.7500e- 003 Worker 4.0900e- 003 2.5700e- 003 0.0348
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
4.6000e004 0.0000 8.4372
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
1.7000e003 1.0000e-004 1.7000e- 1.7000e-003 0.0000 8.4257 8.4257 003 Total 1.3680 0.0378 0.0597 1.7000e-003
8.4257 8.4257 4.6000e004 0.0000 8.4372
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 5.6400e003 0.0378 0.0597 1.0000e-004 1.7000e- 003 1.7000e-003 1.7000e- 003 1.7000e-003 0.0000 Archit. Coating 1.3624 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
1.9138 1.9138 5.0000e005 5.0000e- 005 Total 7.4000e- 1.9296 004 4.7000e- 004 6.3100e-003 2.0000e-005 2.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4300e-003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e-004 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 6.0000e- 10.6619 005 1.1000e-004 0.0134 7.0000e- 3.6300e-003 0.0000 10.5749 10.5749 005 0.0134 3.5700e- 003 Worker 4.0900e- 003 2.5700e- 003 0.0348
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
4.6000e004 0.0000 8.4372
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
1.7000e003 1.0000e-004 1.7000e- 1.7000e-003 0.0000 8.4257 8.4257 003 Total 1.3680 0.0378 0.0597 1.7000e-003
8.4257 8.4257 4.6000e004 0.0000 8.4372
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 5.6400e003 0.0378 0.0597 1.0000e-004 1.7000e- 003 1.7000e-003 1.7000e- 003 1.7000e-003 0.0000 Archit. Coating 1.3624 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
10.5749 10.5749 2.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 Total 4.0900e- 10.6619 003 2.5700e- 003 0.0348 1.1000e-004 0.0141 7.0000e- 005 0.0142 3.7500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.8100e-003 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
1,120,799
Total 1,579.51 1,579.51 1,579.51 6,420,184 6,420,184
Parking Lot 47.01 47.01 47.01 1,120,799
Annual VMT
Manufacturing 1,532.50 1,532.50 1532.50 5,299,385 5,299,385 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0667 0.2752 2,904.0914
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
2,904.0914
Unmitigated 0.3020 3.6011 4.7322 0.0293 2.4117 0.0400 2.4517 0.6455 0.0380 0.6835 0.0000 2,820.4217 2,820.4217
0.0000 2,820.4217 2,820.4217 0.0667 0.2752
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrMitigated 0.3020 3.6011 4.7322 0.0293 2.4117 0.0400 2.4517 0.6455 0.0380 0.6835 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
10.5749 10.5749 2.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 Total 4.0900e- 10.6619 003 2.5700e- 003 0.0348 1.1000e-004 0.0134 7.0000e- 005 0.0134 3.5700e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.6300e-003 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
342.5602 342.5602 6.5700e003 6.2800e-003 344.5959
6.5700e003 6.2800e-003 344.5959
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0346 0.3147 0.2643 1.8900e-003 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000 NaturalGas 1.8900e-003 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000 342.5602 342.5602 Mitigated
0.0346 0.3147 0.2643
196.7746 196.7746 0.0318 3.8600e-003 198.7204
0.0318 3.8600e-003 198.7204
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 196.7746 196.7746 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.000000 0.000000
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Parking Lot 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Manufacturing 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 65.50 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 0 0
Manufacturing 9.50 7.30 7.30 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
342.5602 342.5602 6.5700e-003 6.2800e003 344.5959
0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0346 0.3147 0.2643 1.8900e003 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
342.5602 6.5700e-003 6.2800e003 344.5959
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.2643 1.8900e- 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000 342.5602
003
Manufacturing 6.41934e+ 0.0239 0.0239
006
0.0346 0.3147
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
342.5602 342.5602 6.5700e-003 6.2800e003 344.5959
0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0346 0.3147 0.2643 1.8900e003 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
342.5602 6.5700e-003 6.2800e003 344.5959
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.2643 1.8900e- 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000 342.5602
003
Manufacturing 6.41934e+ 0.0239 0.0239
006
0.0346 0.3147
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGa PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
2.6000e-004 13.1400
Total 196.7746 0.0318 3.8600e-003 198.7204
Parking Lot 140627 13.0113 2.1000e-003
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Manufacturing 1.98612e+
006
183.7633 0.0297 3.6000e-003 185.5804
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2.6000e-004 13.1400
Total 196.7746 0.0318 3.8600e-003 198.7204
Parking Lot 140627 13.0113 2.1000e-003
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Manufacturing 1.98612e+
006
183.7633 0.0297 3.6000e-003 185.5804
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated
0.0116 0.0116 3.0000e005 0.0000 0.0123
3.0000e005 0.0000 0.0123
Total 1.1204 5.0000e-005 5.9300e003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 0.0000
2.0000e005 0.0000 2.0000e- 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0116 0.0116 005 Landscaping 5.5000e- 2.0000e-005 004 5.0000e-005 5.9300e- 003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.9836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.1362
CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
3.0000e005 0.0000 0.0123
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
0.0123
Unmitigated 1.1204 5.0000e-005 5.9300e003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0116 0.0116
0.0000 0.0116 0.0116 3.0000e005 0.0000
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrMitigated 1.1204 5.0000e-005 5.9300e003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total
PM10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 37.1016 1.4818 0.0354 84.6799
Install Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow Toilet
0.0116 0.0116 3.0000e005 0.0000 0.0123
3.0000e005 0.0000 0.0123
Total 1.1204 5.0000e-005 5.9300e003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e-005 0.0000
2.0000e005 0.0000 2.0000e- 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0116 0.0116 005 Landscaping 5.5000e- 2.0000e-005 004 5.0000e-005 5.9300e- 003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.9836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.1362
N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
0.0000 0.0000
Total 37.1016 1.4818 0.0354 84.6799
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Manufacturing 45.362 / 0 37.1016 1.4818 0.0354 84.6799
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
0.0000 0.0000
Total 46.3770 1.8522 0.0442 105.8498
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Manufacturing 56.7025 / 0 46.3770 1.8522 0.0442 105.8498 105.8498
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 46.3770 1.8522 0.0442
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Manufacturing 304.05 61.7194 3.6475 0.0000 152.9072
152.9072
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 61.7194 3.6475 0.0000
ton
MT/yr
Mitigated 30.8597 1.8238 0.0000 76.4536
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied User Defined Equipment
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
0.0000 0.0000
Total 30.8597 1.8238 0.0000 76.4536
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Manufacturing 152.025 30.8597 1.8238 0.0000 76.4536
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 61.7194 3.6475 0.0000 152.9072
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:32 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
880 Doolittle Project
Alameda County, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2
0 Parking Lot 401.79 1000sqft 9.22 401,790.00 0
Manufacturing 245.20 1000sqft 5.63 245,200.00
N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.004
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Land Use -
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033
Precipitation Freq (Days) 63
Climate Zone 4 Operational Year 2025
Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Per AB 393Fleet Mix - antcipated fleet mixOff-road Equipment - crushing and reusing all materials onsiteConstruction Phase - Anticipated construction scheduleDemolition - Grading - Vehicle Trips - Per transportation analysisConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - BAAQMD rule compliance CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 Off-road Equipment -
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 44.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 46.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 66.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 195.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/28/2024 5/1/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/23/2024 9/2/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/11/2025 7/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/17/2025 6/2/2025
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 42.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/12/2024 7/1/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/18/2025 6/3/2025tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/15/2025 5/1/2025tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/24/2024 9/3/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/14/2025 7/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/11/2024 6/28/2024
tblFleetMix LDA 0.57 0.00tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00tblFleetMix HHD 0.01 1.00tblFleetMix LDA 0.57 1.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/29/2024 5/2/2024
tblFleetMix HHD 0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix LHD2 5.2110e-003 0.00tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.00tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.00tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.00tblFleetMix MH 2.4230e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.00tblFleetMix LHD2 5.2110e-003 0.00tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix OBUS 7.9000e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 3.4300e-004 0.00tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00tblFleetMix OBUS 7.9000e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 2.4230e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other Construction EquipmenttblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes tblFleetMix UBUS 5.6000e-004 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 15,000.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 3.4300e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 5.6000e-004 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 13.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 28.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 65.50
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Generator Sets tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 6.25
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.12
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 6.25tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 0.12tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 6.25 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 0.12
3.3564 37.6004 32.3558
N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
7,303.1929 7,303.1929 0.7397 0.3772 7,433.0484
2.0031 0.7496 10,415.634
4 2025 43.7205 18.5140 26.0632 0.0723 3.3965 0.6195 4.0160 0.9172 0.5860 1.5032 0.0000
1.2980 11.2733 0.0000 10,155.4746 10,155.474
6 2024 0.1001 19.8049 1.3882 21.0349 10.1417
2.0031 0.7496 10,415.634
4 1.2980 11.2733 0.0000 10,155.4746 10,155.474
6 Maximum 43.7205 37.6004 32.3558 0.1001 19.8049 1.3882 21.0349 10.1417 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction
3.3564 37.6004 32.3558
CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
7,303.1929 7,303.1929 0.7397 0.3772 7,433.0484
2.0031 0.7496 10,415.634
4 2025 43.7205 18.5140 26.0632 0.0723 3.2261 0.6195 3.8456 0.8754 0.5860 1.4614 0.0000
1.2980 5.4878 0.0000 10,155.4746 10,155.474
6 2024 0.1001 8.5435 1.3882 9.7736 4.3561
2.0031 0.7496 10,415.634
4 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2
1.2980 5.4878 0.0000 10,155.4746 10,155.474
6 Maximum 43.7205 37.6004 32.3558 0.1001 8.5435 1.3882 9.7736 4.3561
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.27 0.00 45.63 52.69 0.00 45.61 0.00
6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
3.7000e004 0.1508
Energy 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
2.3000e004 0.0000 2.3000e- 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416 004 Area 2.3000e-004
0.3870 1.6524 18,208.322
6 0.2090 3.8794 17,706.2274 17,706.227
4 Mobile 1.8750 18.9601 27.3271 0.1668 13.7542 0.2202 13.9744 3.6704 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20,289.853
9 Total 8.2068 20.6849 28.8413 0.1772 13.7542 0.3515 14.1057 3.6704 0.3402 4.0107 Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
19,775.4539 19,775.453
9 0.4270 1.6904
0.0000 2.3000e004 Area 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 2.3000e-004 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mobile 1.8750 18.9601 27.3271 3.6704
2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
3.7000e004 0.1508
Energy 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416
CO SO2
19,775.4539 19,775.453
9 0.4270 1.6904 20,289.853
9 0.3870 1.6524 18,208.322
6 Total 8.2068 20.6849 28.8413 0.1772 13.7542 0.3515 14.1057 3.6704 0.3402 4.0107
0.2090 3.8794 17,706.2274 17,706.227
4 0.1668 13.7542 0.2202 13.9744
0.00 3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx
Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2024 5/1/2024 5 44
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date
0.00 0.00
5 42
3 Grading Grading 7/1/2024 9/2/2024 5 462 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/2/2024 6/28/2024 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5 195
5 Paving Paving 6/3/2025 7/31/2025 5 434 Building Construction Building Construction 9/3/2024 6/2/2025 Acres of Paving: 9.22
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 367,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 122,600; Striped Parking Area: 24,107 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 66
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 63
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 138
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/1/2025 7/31/2025
0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247
0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81
0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187
0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97
0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89
0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97
0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130
0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
0.48 Demolition Other Construction Equipment 1 8.00 172 0.42Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
0.37 Demolition Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling Vehicle
Class
Demolition 9 23.00 0.00 3,283.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
HHDT
Grading 8 20.00 0.00 1,875.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 272.00 106.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved RoadsClean Paved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground CoverWater Exposed AreaWater Unpaved Roads Architectural Coating 1 54.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 16.1470 0.0000 16.1470 2.4448 0.0000 2.4448 0.0000 Off-Road 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 1.3030 1.3030 1.2165 1.2165 5,270.4686 5,270.4686
0.0000
5,304.5878
1.3648 5,304.5878
Total 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 16.1470 1.3030 17.4500 2.4448 1.2165 3.6613 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
5,270.4686 5,270.4686 1.3648
Hauling 0.1581 9.4860 2.2214 0.0843 1.3913 0.3584
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
0.0597 0.0325 0.5148
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.1025 0.7458 4,944.9222
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0437 1.3070 0.0807 0.4391 4,720.1004 4,720.1004
4,885.0060 4,885.0060 0.1065 0.7496 5,111.0466
3.9200e003 3.7600e- 003 166.1244
Total 0.2178 9.5185 2.7362 0.0453 1.4959 0.0852 1.5811 0.4086 0.0815 0.4900
8.3000e004 1.6000e-003 0.1889 9.0000e- 0.0510 164.9056 164.9056 004 Worker 0.1898 0.0501 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day
5,270.4686 5,270.4686 1.3648 5,304.5878
0.0000
Off-Road 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 1.3030 1.3030 1.2165 1.2165 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 6.9028 0.0000 6.9028 1.0452 0.0000 1.0452 0.0000
1.3648 5,304.5878
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 6.9028 1.3030 8.2059 1.0452 1.2165 2.2616 0.0000 5,270.4686 5,270.4686 Hauling 0.1581 9.4860 2.2214 0.0843 1.3321 0.3439
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0597 0.0325 0.5148
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.1025 0.7458 4,944.9222
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0437 1.2478 0.0807 0.4245 4,720.1004 4,720.1004
4,885.0060 4,885.0060 0.1065 0.7496 5,111.0466
3.9200e003 3.7600e- 003 166.1244
Total 0.2178 9.5185 2.7362 0.0453 1.4269 0.0852 1.5121 0.3916 0.0815 0.4731
8.3000e004 1.6000e-003 0.1791 9.0000e- 0.0485 164.9056 164.9056 004 Worker 0.1800 0.0477 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day
3,688.0100 3,688.0100 1.1928 3,717.8294
0.0000
Off-Road 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 1.2294 1.2294 1.1310 1.1310 Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000
1.1928 3,717.8294
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 19.6570 1.2294 20.8864 10.1025 1.1310 11.2335 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0467 0.0254 0.4029
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
129.0566 129.0566 3.0700e003 2.9400e- 003 130.0104
3.0700e003 2.9400e- 003 130.0104
Total 0.0467 0.0254 0.4029 1.2500e-003 0.1479 7.1000e004 0.1486 0.0392 6.5000e- 004 0.0399
6.5000e004 1.2500e-003 0.1479 7.1000e- 0.0399 129.0566 129.0566 004 Worker 0.1486 0.0392 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day
3,688.0100 3,688.0100 1.1928 3,717.8294
0.0000
Off-Road 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 1.2294 1.2294 1.1310 1.1310 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 8.4034 0.0000 8.4034 4.3188 0.0000 4.3188 0.0000
1.1928 3,717.8294
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 8.4034 1.2294 9.6327 4.3188 1.1310 5.4498 0.0000 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0467 0.0254 0.4029
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
129.0566 129.0566 3.0700e003 2.9400e- 003 130.0104
3.0700e003 2.9400e- 003 130.0104
Total 0.0467 0.0254 0.4029 1.2500e-003 0.1402 7.1000e004 0.1409 0.0373 6.5000e- 004 0.0380
6.5000e004 1.2500e-003 0.1402 7.1000e- 0.0380 129.0566 129.0566 004 Worker 0.1409 0.0373 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3.4 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day
6,009.7487 6,009.7487 1.9437 6,058.3405
0.0000
Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 1.3354 1.3354 1.2286 1.2286 Fugitive Dust 9.2405 0.0000 9.2405 3.6593 0.0000 3.6593 0.0000
1.9437 6,058.3405
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 9.2405 1.3354 10.5759 3.6593 1.2286 4.8879 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 Hauling 0.0864 5.1821 1.2136 0.0461 0.7601 0.1958
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0519 0.0283 0.4476
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0560 0.4074 2,701.3739
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0239 0.7140 0.0441 0.2399 2,578.5554 2,578.5554
2,721.9516 2,721.9516 0.0594 0.4107 2,845.8299
3.4100e003 3.2700e- 003 144.4560
Total 0.1383 5.2104 1.6612 0.0253 0.8783 0.0468 0.9251 0.2394 0.0448 0.2842
7.2000e004 1.3900e-003 0.1643 7.8000e- 0.0443 143.3962 143.3962 004 Worker 0.1651 0.0436 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day
6,009.7487 6,009.7487 1.9437 6,058.3405
0.0000
Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 1.3354 1.3354 1.2286 1.2286 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 3.9503 0.0000 3.9503 1.5644 0.0000 1.5644 0.0000
1.9437 6,058.3405
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 3.9503 1.3354 5.2857 1.5644 1.2286 2.7929 0.0000 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 Hauling 0.0864 5.1821 1.2136 0.0461 0.7277 0.1879
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0519 0.0283 0.4476
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0560 0.4074 2,701.3739
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0239 0.6817 0.0441 0.2319 2,578.5554 2,578.5554
2,721.9516 2,721.9516 0.0594 0.4107 2,845.8299
3.4100e003 3.2700e- 003 144.4560
Total 0.1383 5.2104 1.6612 0.0253 0.8374 0.0468 0.8842 0.2294 0.0448 0.2741
7.2000e004 1.3900e-003 0.1557 7.8000e- 0.0422 143.3962 143.3962 004 Worker 0.1565 0.0415 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day
2,570.8077
0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
0.7058 0.3845 6.0877
2,223.8250 2,223.8250 0.0309 0.3330 2,323.8393
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1072 4.4874 1.3544 0.0208 0.7184 0.0282 0.7466 0.2069 0.0270 0.2338
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
4,174.0130 4,174.0130 0.0773 0.3775 4,288.4414
0.0464 0.0445 1,964.6021
Total 0.8130 4.8719 7.4422 0.0397 2.9528 0.0389 2.9917 0.7995 0.0368 0.8363
9.8200e003 Worker 0.0189 2.2344 0.0107 2.2451 0.5927 0.6025 1,950.1880 1,950.1880 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,570.8077
0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
0.7058 0.3845 6.0877
2,223.8250 2,223.8250 0.0309 0.3330 2,323.8393
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1072 4.4874 1.3544 0.0208 0.6877 0.0282 0.7159 0.1993 0.0270 0.2263
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
4,174.0130 4,174.0130 0.0773 0.3775 4,288.4414
0.0464 0.0445 1,964.6021
Total 0.8130 4.8719 7.4422 0.0397 2.8056 0.0389 2.8445 0.7634 0.0368 0.8002
9.8200e003 Worker 0.0189 2.1179 0.0107 2.1286 0.5641 0.5739 1,950.1880 1,950.1880 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,571.4981 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
0.6620 0.3465 5.7045
2,184.1886 2,184.1886 0.0309 0.3272 2,282.4752
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1050 4.4835 1.3324 0.0205 0.7184 0.0282 0.7467 0.2069 0.0270 0.2339
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
4,087.4226 4,087.4226 0.0730 0.3690 4,199.1935
0.0421 0.0417 1,916.7183
Total 0.7669 4.8300 7.0369 0.0387 2.9529 0.0384 2.9913 0.7995 0.0364 0.8359
9.4000e003 Worker 0.0183 2.2344 0.0102 2.2446 0.5927 0.6021 1,903.2340 1,903.2340 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,571.4981
0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
0.6620 0.3465 5.7045
2,184.1886 2,184.1886 0.0309 0.3272 2,282.4752
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1050 4.4835 1.3324 0.0205 0.6878 0.0282 0.7160 0.1993 0.0270 0.2263
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
4,087.4226 4,087.4226 0.0730 0.3690 4,199.1935
0.0421 0.0417 1,916.7183
Total 0.7669 4.8300 7.0369 0.0387 2.8057 0.0384 2.8441 0.7634 0.0364 0.7998
9.4000e003 Worker 0.0183 2.1179 0.0102 2.1281 0.5641 0.5735 1,903.2340 1,903.2340
0.9152 8.5816 14.5780
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.0000 0.0000
0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.5618 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 Total 1.4769 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 0.7137 2,224.5878 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0365 0.0191 0.3146
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
104.9578 104.9578 2.3200e003 2.3000e- 003 105.7014
2.3200e003 2.3000e- 003 105.7014
Total 0.0365 0.0191 0.3146 1.0100e-003 0.1232 5.6000e004 0.1238 0.0327 5.2000e- 004 0.0332
5.2000e004 1.0100e-003 0.1232 5.6000e- 0.0332 104.9578 104.9578 004 Worker 0.1238 0.0327
0.9152 8.5816 14.5780
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.0000 0.0000
0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.5618 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 Total 1.4769 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 0.7137 2,224.5878 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0365 0.0191 0.3146
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
104.9578 104.9578 2.3200e003 2.3000e- 003 105.7014
2.3200e003 2.3000e- 003 105.7014
Total 0.0365 0.0191 0.3146 1.0100e-003 0.1168 5.6000e004 0.1174 0.0311 5.2000e- 004 0.0316
5.2000e004 1.0100e-003 0.1168 5.6000e- 0.0316 104.9578 104.9578 004 Worker 0.1174 0.0311
41.2838
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319
0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 41.4547 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.1314 0.0688 1.1325
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
377.8479 377.8479 8.3600e003 8.2800e- 003 380.5250
8.3600e003 8.2800e- 003 380.5250
Total 0.1314 0.0688 1.1325 3.6300e-003 0.4436 2.0300e003 0.4456 0.1177 1.8700e- 003 0.1195
1.8700e003 3.6300e-003 0.4436 2.0300e- 0.1195 377.8479 377.8479 003 Worker 0.4456 0.1177
41.2838
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319
0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 41.4547 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3.6300e-003 0.4205 2.0300e- 377.8479 377.8479
003
Worker 0.1314 0.0688 1.1325 0.4225 0.1120
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
PM2.5 Total
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
377.8479 377.8479 8.3600e003 8.2800e- 003 380.5250
8.3600e003 8.2800e- 003 380.5250
Total 0.1314 0.0688 1.1325 3.6300e-003 0.4205 2.0300e003 0.4225 0.1120 1.8700e- 003 0.1139
1.8700e003 0.1139
17,706.2274 17,706.227
4 0.3870 1.6524 18,208.322
6 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 1.8750 18.9601 27.3271 0.1668 13.7542 0.2202 13.9744 3.6704 0.2090 3.8794 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2 5
Exhaust
PM2 5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
27.3271 0.1668
Annual VMT
Manufacturing 1,532.50 1,532.50 1532.50 5,299,385 5,299,385 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
1.6524 18,208.322
6 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
3.8794 17,706.2274 17,706.227
4 Unmitigated 1.8750 18.9601 13.7542 0.2202 13.9744 3.6704 0.2090 0.3870
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
1,120,799
Total 1,579.51 1,579.51 1,579.51 6,420,184 6,420,184
Parking Lot 47.01 47.01 47.01 1,120,799
Manufacturing 9.50 7.30 7.30 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 65.50 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 0 0
0.000000 0.00000
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.00000
Parking Lot 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Manufacturing 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
0.1897 1.7242 1.4484
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 NaturalGas 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 2,069.0849 2,069.0849 Mitigated
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Manufacturing 17587.2 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 2,069.0849 2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
0.1897 1.7242
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Manufacturing 17.5872 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 2,069.0849
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
0.0000
CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
3.7000e004 0.1508
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
0.1508
Unmitigated 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416
0.1416 0.1416 3.7000e004
CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
0.7465
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
5.3896 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
0.1508
3.7000e004 0.1508
Total 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004
2.3000e004 0.0000 2.3000e- 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416 004 Landscaping 6.0700e- 2.3000e-004 003 6.0000e-004 0.0659 Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.1416 0.1416 3.7000e004
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
0.7465
N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
6.0700e003 6.0000e-004 0.0659
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
5.3896 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.1416 0.1416 3.7000e004 0.1508
3.7000e004 0.1508
Total 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004
2.3000e004 0.0000 2.3000e- 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416 004 Landscaping 2.3000e-004
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow Toilet CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:30 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
Install Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - Per AB 393Fleet Mix - antcipated fleet mixOff-road Equipment - crushing and reusing all materials onsiteConstruction Phase - Anticipated construction scheduleDemolition - Grading - Vehicle Trips - Per transportation analysisConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - BAAQMD rule compliance N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.004
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Land Use -
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033
Precipitation Freq (Days) 63
Climate Zone 4 Operational Year 2025
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2
0 Parking Lot 401.79 1000sqft 9.22 401,790.00 0
Manufacturing 245.20 1000sqft 5.63 245,200.00
880 Doolittle ProjectAlameda County, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.57 0.00tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00tblFleetMix HHD 0.01 1.00tblFleetMix LDA 0.57 1.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/29/2024 5/2/2024
tblFleetMix HHD 0.01 0.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/12/2024 7/1/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/18/2025 6/3/2025tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/15/2025 5/1/2025tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/24/2024 9/3/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/14/2025 7/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/11/2024 6/28/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/28/2024 5/1/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/23/2024 9/2/2024tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/11/2025 7/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/17/2025 6/2/2025
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 42.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 44.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 46.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 66.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 195.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 Off-road Equipment -
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 13.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 28.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 65.50
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Generator Sets tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other Construction EquipmenttblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes tblFleetMix UBUS 5.6000e-004 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 15,000.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 3.4300e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 5.6000e-004 0.00tblFleetMix OBUS 7.9000e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 3.4300e-004 0.00tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00tblFleetMix OBUS 7.9000e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 2.4230e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.00tblFleetMix MH 2.4230e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.00tblFleetMix LHD2 5.2110e-003 0.00tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LHD2 5.2110e-003 0.00tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.00tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.0033 0.7510 10,409.461
8 1.2981 11.2733 0.0000 10,148.8743 10,148.874
3 Maximum 43.7329 38.1661 32.3697 0.1000 19.8049 1.3883 21.0349 10.1417 7,144.0251 7,144.0251 0.7413 0.3858 7,276.6200
2.0033 0.7510 10,409.461
8 2025 43.7329 18.8804 25.8840 0.0708 3.3965 0.6196 4.0161 0.9172 0.5861 1.5033 0.0000
1.2981 11.2733 0.0000 10,148.8743 10,148.874
3 2024 3.3518 38.1661 32.3697 0.1000 19.8049 1.3883 21.0349 10.1417 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 6.25
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.12
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 6.25tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 0.12tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 6.25 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 0.12
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 100.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
0.4188 1.6814 17,557.712
2 0.2090 3.8795 17,046.1820 17,046.182
0 Mobile 1.6369 20.2653 27.0900 0.1605 13.7542 0.2203 13.9745 3.6704 2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
3.7000e004 0.1508
Energy 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
2.3000e004 0.0000 2.3000e- 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416 004 Area 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 2.3000e-004 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.27 0.00 45.63 52.69 0.00 45.61 0.00
2.0033 0.7510 10,409.461
8 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2
1.2981 5.4878 0.0000 10,148.8743 10,148.874
3 Maximum 43.7329 38.1661 32.3697 0.1000 8.5435 1.3883 9.7736 4.3561 7,144.0251 7,144.0251 0.7413 0.3858 7,276.6200
2.0033 0.7510 10,409.461
8 2025 43.7329 18.8804 25.8840 0.0708 3.2261 0.6196 3.8457 0.8754 0.5861 1.4615 0.0000
1.2981 5.4878 0.0000 10,148.8743 10,148.874
3 2024 3.3518 38.1661 32.3697 0.1000 8.5435 1.3883 9.7736 4.3561 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 5 42
3 Grading Grading 7/1/2024 9/2/2024 5 462 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/2/2024 6/28/2024 Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2024 5/1/2024 5 44
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date
0.00 0.00 0.00
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2
19,115.4085 19,115.408
5 0.4588 1.7193 19,639.243
5 0.4188 1.6814 17,557.712
2 Total 7.9687 21.9901 28.6043 0.1708 13.7542 0.3516 14.1057 3.6704 0.3403 4.0108
0.2090 3.8795 17,046.1820 17,046.182
0 Mobile 1.6369 20.2653 27.0900 0.1605 13.7542 0.2203 13.9745 3.6704 2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
3.7000e004 0.1508
Energy 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
2.3000e004 0.0000 2.3000e- 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416 004 Area 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 2.3000e-004 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
19,115.4085 19,115.408
5 0.4588 1.7193 19,639.243
5 Total 7.9687 21.9901 28.6043 0.1708 13.7542 0.3516 14.1057 3.6704 0.3403 4.0108 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130
0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97
0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89
0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97
0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Graders 1 8.00 187
0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97
0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247
0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 Acres of Paving: 9.22
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 367,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 122,600; Striped Parking Area: 24,107 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 66
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 63
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 138
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/1/2025 7/31/2025 5 195
5 Paving Paving 6/3/2025 7/31/2025 5 43
4 Building Construction Building Construction 9/3/2024 6/2/2025 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved RoadsClean Paved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground CoverWater Exposed AreaWater Unpaved Roads Architectural Coating 1 54.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 272.00 106.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 8 20.00 0.00 1,875.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling Vehicle
Class
Demolition 9 23.00 0.00 3,283.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
0.37 Demolition Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97
0.48 Demolition Other Construction Equipment 1 8.00 172 0.42Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
4,878.4057 4,878.4057 0.1065 0.7510 5,104.8739
4.5000e003 4.3500e- 003 154.5138
Total 0.2086 10.0842 2.7501 0.0453 1.4959 0.0853 1.5813 0.4086 0.0816 0.4901
8.3000e004 1.4800e-003 0.1889 9.0000e- 0.0510 153.1060 153.1060 004 Worker 0.0609 0.0404 0.4964 0.1898 0.0501
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.1020 0.7467 4,950.3601
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.1477 10.0438 2.2537 0.0438 1.3070 0.0844 1.3914 0.3584 0.0808 0.4392 4,725.2997 4,725.2997 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
5,270.4686 5,270.4686 1.3648 5,304.5878
1.3648 5,304.5878
Total 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 16.1470 1.3030 17.4500 2.4448 1.2165 3.6613
0.0000
Off-Road 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 1.3030 1.3030 1.2165 1.2165 5,270.4686 5,270.4686
0.0000
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 16.1470 0.0000 16.1470 2.4448 0.0000 2.4448 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
4,878.4057 4,878.4057 0.1065 0.7510 5,104.8739
4.5000e003 4.3500e- 003 154.5138
Total 0.2086 10.0842 2.7501 0.0453 1.4269 0.0853 1.5122 0.3916 0.0816 0.4732
8.3000e004 1.4800e-003 0.1791 9.0000e- 0.0485 153.1060 153.1060 004 Worker 0.0609 0.0404 0.4964 0.1800 0.0477
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.1020 0.7467 4,950.3601
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.1477 10.0438 2.2537 0.0438 1.2478 0.0844 1.3322 0.3439 0.0808 0.4247 4,725.2997 4,725.2997 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
1.3648 5,304.5878
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 6.9028 1.3030 8.2059 1.0452 1.2165 2.2616 0.0000 5,270.4686 5,270.4686 5,270.4686 5,270.4686 1.3648 5,304.5878
0.0000
Off-Road 3.0046 28.0819 29.6196 0.0547 1.3030 1.3030 1.2165 1.2165 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 6.9028 0.0000 6.9028 1.0452 0.0000 1.0452 0.0000 Category lb/day lb/day
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
119.8221 119.8221 3.5200e003 3.4000e- 003 120.9239
3.5200e003 3.4000e- 003 120.9239
Total 0.0476 0.0316 0.3885 1.1600e-003 0.1479 7.1000e004 0.1486 0.0392 6.5000e- 004 0.0399
6.5000e004 1.1600e-003 0.1479 7.1000e- 0.0399 119.8221 119.8221 004 Worker 0.0476 0.0316 0.3885 0.1486 0.0392
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
1.1928 3,717.8294
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 19.6570 1.2294 20.8864 10.1025 1.1310 11.2335 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 1.1928 3,717.8294
0.0000
Off-Road 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 1.2294 1.2294 1.1310 1.1310 Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 Category lb/day lb/day
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3.4 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
119.8221 119.8221 3.5200e003 3.4000e- 003 120.9239
3.5200e003 3.4000e- 003 120.9239
Total 0.0476 0.0316 0.3885 1.1600e-003 0.1402 7.1000e004 0.1409 0.0373 6.5000e- 004 0.0380
6.5000e004 1.1600e-003 0.1402 7.1000e- 0.0380 119.8221 119.8221 004 Worker 0.0476 0.0316 0.3885 0.1409 0.0373
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
1.1928 3,717.8294
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 8.4034 1.2294 9.6327 4.3188 1.1310 5.4498 0.0000 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 3,688.0100 1.1928 3,717.8294
0.0000
Off-Road 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 1.2294 1.2294 1.1310 1.1310 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 8.4034 0.0000 8.4034 4.3188 0.0000 4.3188 0.0000 Category lb/day lb/day
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,714.5314 2,714.5314 0.0596 0.4117 2,838.7044
3.9100e003 3.7800e- 003 134.3599
Total 0.1336 5.5220 1.6629 0.0252 0.8783 0.0469 0.9252 0.2394 0.0448 0.2842
7.2000e004 1.2900e-003 0.1643 7.8000e- 0.0443 133.1356 133.1356 004 Worker 0.0529 0.0351 0.4317 0.1651 0.0436
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0557 0.4079 2,704.3446
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0807 5.4869 1.2312 0.0239 0.7140 0.0461 0.7601 0.1958 0.0441 0.2399 2,581.3958 2,581.3958 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
1.9437 6,058.3405
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 9.2405 1.3354 10.5759 3.6593 1.2286 4.8879 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 1.9437 6,058.3405
0.0000
Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 1.3354 1.3354 1.2286 1.2286 Fugitive Dust 9.2405 0.0000 9.2405 3.6593 0.0000 3.6593 0.0000 Category lb/day lb/day
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,714.5314 2,714.5314 0.0596 0.4117 2,838.7044
3.9100e003 3.7800e- 003 134.3599
Total 0.1336 5.5220 1.6629 0.0252 0.8374 0.0469 0.8843 0.2294 0.0448 0.2742
7.2000e004 1.2900e-003 0.1557 7.8000e- 0.0422 133.1356 133.1356 004 Worker 0.0529 0.0351 0.4317 0.1565 0.0415
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0557 0.4079 2,704.3446
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0807 5.4869 1.2312 0.0239 0.6817 0.0461 0.7278 0.1879 0.0441 0.2320 2,581.3958 2,581.3958 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
1.9437 6,058.3405
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 3.9503 1.3354 5.2857 1.5644 1.2286 2.7929 0.0000 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 6,009.7487 1.9437 6,058.3405
0.0000
Off-Road 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 1.3354 1.3354 1.2286 1.2286 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 3.9503 0.0000 3.9503 1.5644 0.0000 1.5644 0.0000 Category lb/day lb/day
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
4,038.2509 4,038.2509 0.0838 0.3853 4,155.1577
0.0532 0.0514 1,827.2942
Total 0.8217 5.2314 7.2707 0.0384 2.9528 0.0390 2.9918 0.7995 0.0369 0.8364
9.8200e003 Worker 0.7196 0.4773 5.8709 0.0176 2.2344 0.0107 2.2451 0.5927 0.6025 1,810.6445 1,810.6445 2,227.6064 2,227.6064 0.0306 0.3339 2,327.8636
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1020 4.7541 1.3998 0.0209 0.7184 0.0283 0.7467 0.2069 0.0271 0.2339 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044 2,570.8077
0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 Category lb/day lb/day
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
4,038.2509 4,038.2509 0.0838 0.3853 4,155.1577
0.0532 0.0514 1,827.2942
Total 0.8217 5.2314 7.2707 0.0384 2.8056 0.0390 2.8446 0.7634 0.0369 0.8003
9.8200e003 Worker 0.7196 0.4773 5.8709 0.0176 2.1179 0.0107 2.1286 0.5641 0.5739 1,810.6445 1,810.6445 2,227.6064 2,227.6064 0.0306 0.3339 2,327.8636
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1020 4.7541 1.3998 0.0209 0.6877 0.0283 0.7160 0.1993 0.0271 0.2264 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044 2,570.8077
0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981
0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
3,955.2408 3,955.2408 0.0790 0.3762 4,069.3363
0.0484 0.0482 1,782.8786
Total 0.7764 5.1798 6.8948 0.0375 2.9529 0.0385 2.9914 0.7995 0.0365 0.8360
9.4000e003 Worker 0.6767 0.4301 5.5177 0.0170 2.2344 0.0102 2.2446 0.5927 0.6021 1,767.3043 1,767.3043 2,187.9365 2,187.9365 0.0306 0.3280 2,286.4577
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0997 4.7497 1.3771 0.0205 0.7184 0.0283 0.7467 0.2069 0.0271 0.2339 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total 1.4769 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 0.7137 2,224.5878
0.0000 0.0000
0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.5618 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
3,955.2408 3,955.2408 0.0790 0.3762 4,069.3363
0.0484 0.0482 1,782.8786
Total 0.7764 5.1798 6.8948 0.0375 2.8057 0.0385 2.8442 0.7634 0.0365 0.7999
9.4000e003 Worker 0.6767 0.4301 5.5177 0.0170 2.1179 0.0102 2.1281 0.5641 0.5735 1,767.3043 1,767.3043 2,187.9365 2,187.9365 0.0306 0.3280 2,286.4577
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0997 4.7497 1.3771 0.0205 0.6878 0.0283 0.7160 0.1993 0.0271 0.2264 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total 1.4769 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 0.7137 2,224.5878
0.0000 0.0000
0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.5618 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
97.4616 97.4616 2.6700e003 2.6600e- 003 98.3205
2.6700e003 2.6600e- 003 98.3205
Total 0.0373 0.0237 0.3043 9.4000e-004 0.1232 5.6000e004 0.1238 0.0327 5.2000e- 004 0.0332
5.2000e004 9.4000e-004 0.1232 5.6000e- 0.0332 97.4616 97.4616 004 Worker 0.0373 0.0237 0.3043 0.1238 0.0327
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total 41.4547 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319
0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 Archit. Coating 41.2838 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
97.4616 97.4616 2.6700e003 2.6600e- 003 98.3205
2.6700e003 2.6600e- 003 98.3205
Total 0.0373 0.0237 0.3043 9.4000e-004 0.1168 5.6000e004 0.1174 0.0311 5.2000e- 004 0.0316
5.2000e004 9.4000e-004 0.1168 5.6000e- 0.0316 97.4616 97.4616 004 Worker 0.0373 0.0237 0.3043 0.1174 0.0311
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total 41.4547 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319
0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-003 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 Archit. Coating 41.2838 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
350.8619 350.8619 9.6100e003 9.5700e- 003 353.9538
9.6100e003 9.5700e- 003 353.9538
Total 0.1344 0.0854 1.0954 3.3700e-003 0.4436 2.0300e003 0.4456 0.1177 1.8700e- 003 0.1195
1.8700e003 3.3700e-003 0.4436 2.0300e- 0.1195 350.8619 350.8619 003 Worker 0.1344 0.0854 1.0954 0.4456 0.1177
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 17,046.1820 17,046.182
0 0.4188 1.6814 17,557.712
2 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 1.6369 20.2653 27.0900 0.1605 13.7542 0.2203 13.9745 3.6704 0.2090 3.8795 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2 5
Exhaust
PM2 5
PM2.5 Total
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
350.8619 350.8619 9.6100e003 9.5700e- 003 353.9538
9.6100e003 9.5700e- 003 353.9538
Total 0.1344 0.0854 1.0954 3.3700e-003 0.4205 2.0300e003 0.4225 0.1120 1.8700e- 003 0.1139
1.8700e003 3.3700e-003 0.4205 2.0300e- 0.1139 350.8619 350.8619 003 Worker 0.1344 0.0854 1.0954 0.4225 0.1120
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
0.000000 0.00000
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.00000
Parking Lot 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Manufacturing 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 65.50 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 0 0
Manufacturing 9.50 7.30 7.30 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
1,120,799
Total 1,579.51 1,579.51 1,579.51 6,420,184 6,420,184
Parking Lot 47.01 47.01 47.01 1,120,799
Annual VMT
Manufacturing 1,532.50 1,532.50 1532.50 5,299,385 5,299,385 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
1.6814 17,557.712
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
3.8795 17,046.1820 17,046.182
0 Unmitigated 1.6369 20.2653 27.0900 0.1605 13.7542 0.2203 13.9745 3.6704 0.2090 0.4188 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Manufacturing 17587.2 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 2,069.0849 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 NaturalGas 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 2,069.0849 2,069.0849 Mitigated
0.1897 1.7242 1.4484
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
3.7000e004 0.1508
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
0.1508
Unmitigated 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416
0.1416 0.1416 3.7000e004
CO2e
Category lb/day lb/dayMitigated 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
2,069.0849 2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2,069.0849 0.0397 0.0379 2,081.3805
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Manufacturing 17.5872 0.1897 1.7242 1.4484 0.0104 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 0.1310 2,069.0849 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow Toilet
0.1416 0.1416 3.7000e004 0.1508
3.7000e004 0.1508
Total 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004
2.3000e004 0.0000 2.3000e- 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416 004 Landscaping 6.0700e- 2.3000e-004 003 6.0000e-004 0.0659
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
5.3896 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
0.7465
N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.1416 0.1416 3.7000e004 0.1508
3.7000e004 0.1508
Total 6.1422 6.0000e-004 0.0659 0.0000 2.3000e004 2.3000e-004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e-004
2.3000e004 0.0000 2.3000e- 2.3000e-004 0.1416 0.1416 004 Landscaping 6.0700e- 2.3000e-004 003 6.0000e-004 0.0659
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
5.3896 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
0.7465
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 12/23/2022 9:29 AM
880 Doolittle Project - Alameda County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
Install Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Model Output: OFFROAD2021 (v1.0.3) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: CountyRegion: AlamedaCalendar Year: 2025Scenario: All Adopted Rules ‐ ExhaustVehicle Classification: OFFROAD2021 Equipment TypesUnits: tons/day for Emissions, gallons/year for Fuel, hours/year for Activity, Horsepower‐hours/year for Horsepower‐hoursRegion Calendar YeaVehicle Category Model Year Horsepower Fuel HC_tpd ROG_tpd TOG_tpd CO_tpd NOx_tpd CO2_tpd PM10_tpd PM2.5_tpd SOx_tpd NH3_tpd Fuel ConsumptionTotal_ActivitTotal_Population Horsepower_Hours_hhpy Alameda 2025 Industrial ‐ Forklifts 2025 100 Diesel 4.94176E‐05 5.97953E‐05 7.11614E‐05 0.0025997 0.0011212 0.4419685 7.64293E‐06 7.031E‐06 4.08474E‐06 3.60729E‐06 14339.18088 17301.688 21.39495125 1379921.359 g/hph
HC ROG TOG CO Nox CO2 PM10 PM2_5 Sox NH3 Fuel_gphr
2025 0.011858328 0.014348577 0.017075992 0.6238235 0.2690417 106.05542 0.001834008 0.0016873 0.000980179 0.00086561 3440851.361 Project Forklifts 5
HP 89Hours per Day 12Days per Year 3651 pound = 453.5924 grams Emissions Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 metric tons/yr PM10 tons/yr Forklift Emissions 0.17 3.11 7.20 0.01 0.02 0.02 1,225 203 0.004 Based on emission rates obtained from CARB OFFROAD Version 1.0.3.Number of forklifts per SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results, June 2014.
Model Output: OFFROAD2021 (v1.0.3) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: CountyRegion: AlamedaCalendar Year: 2025Scenario: All Adopted Rules ‐ ExhaustVehicle Classification: OFFROAD2021 Equipment TypesUnits: tons/day for Emissions, gallons/year for Fuel, hours/year for Activity, Horsepower‐hours/year for Horsepower‐hoursRegion Calendar YeVehicle Category Model Year Horsepower BFuel HC_tpd ROG_tpd TOG_tpd CO_tpd NOx_tpd CO2_tpd PM10_tpd PM2.5_tpd SOx_tpd NH3_tpd Fuel Consumption Total_Activ Total_Population Horsepower_Hours_hhpy Alameda 2025 Airport Ground Support ‐ Cargo Loader Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.000196174 0.00023737 0.00028249 0.004899 0.002411 0.890846 8.38678E‐05 7.71584E‐05 8.23042E‐06 7.27096E‐06 28902.50204 14228.45 29.80847884 1666655.073 Alameda 2025 Airport Ground Support ‐ Cargo Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.000332026 0.000401752 0.000478118 0.003831 0.003332 0.726877 0.000185275 0.000170453 6.71037E‐06 5.93267E‐06 23582.71218 13368.79 19.76605014 1258467.47 Alameda 2025 Airport Ground Support ‐ Misc ‐ Cargo Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 0.006933588 0.006377514 0.007629991 0.675615 0.033137 7.364745 0.000513488 0.000387968 6.08041E‐05 0.000112034 319802.05 61374.75 45.42 5830601.25 g/hph
HC ROG TOG CO Nox CO2 PM10 PM2_5 Sox NH3 Fuel_gphr
2025 0.038975445 0.047160289 0.056124641 0.9732985 0.4790538 176.99157 0.016662705 0.015329689 0.001635206 0.001444581 5742296.562
0.087362752 0.105708929 0.125802362 1.0079949 0.8768078 191.25581 0.048749517 0.044849556 0.001765634 0.001561004 6205083.9640.393768168 0.362187961 0.433317849 38.36913 1.8818867 418.25415 0.029161683 0.022033272 0.003453148 0.006362579 18162005.71 HC ROG TOG CO Nox CO2 PM10 PM2_5 Sox NH3 Fuel_gphr
2025 1.161798739 1.405776474 1.672990184 29.012548 14.279864 5275.8495 0.49668989 0.456954699 0.048742991 0.043060774 171169125.6
1.726816529 2.089448 2.486615801 19.924077 17.331028 3780.3718 0.963585403 0.886498571 0.034899608 0.030854887 122650000.817.88495018 16.45057717 19.68129669 1742.7259 85.475296 18997.104 1.324523655 1.000751206 0.156842 0.288988344 824918299.520.77356544 19.94580165 23.84090267 1791.6625 117.08619 28053.325 2.784798948 2.344204475 0.240484598 0.362904005 11187374260.218681704 0.209967899 0.250971324 18.860692 1.2325572 295.31516 0.029315361 0.024677258 0.002531563 0.003820262 11776861.66 Project Yard Trucks 1HP 190Hours per Day 12
Days per Year 365
1 pound = 453.5924 gramsEmissions Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 MT/yr PM10 tons/yr Project Yard Trucks 0.93 5.47 83.69 0.01 0.13 0.11 1310.32 216.94 0.024Based on aggregated emission rates obtained from CARB OFFROAD Version 1.0.1 Number of yard trucks/hostlers per SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results, June 2014 Emergency Backup Generator Emissions
Fuel Type Quantity HP LF
Hours/Year
per Unit
Hours per
Day
HP‐hr per
day
Total hp‐hr
per year
Standard Generator Diesel 2 750 0.74 50 1 1,500 75,000
HC ROG TOG CO NOX CO2 PM10 PM2.5 PM SOX
Emissions Rates (g/hp‐hr) 0.14 1.0205827 1.1249089 2.6 2.85 521.63114 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00494 Pounds/Day 0.46 3.38 3.72 8.60 9.42 1725.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.02 Tons/Year 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.21 0.24 43.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 Metric tons/year 39.12
Source: Emissions rates from CalEEMod Guide Appenix D, Table 12.1 Appendix B
Health Risk Assessment
Health Risk Assessment
880 Doolittle Drive Project
City of San Leandro, California
Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
10 S. Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1250
San José, California 95113
Contact: Ms. Noemi Wyss
669.800.4152
November 2023
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Location................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 Climate.............................................................................................................................................. 6
2.2 Toxic Air Contaminants...................................................................................................................... 6
2.3 Sensitive Receptors............................................................................................................................ 8 3 REGULATORY SETTING
3.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................................ 10
3.2 State of California ............................................................................................................................ 11
3.3 Regional........................................................................................................................................... 13 4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY
4.1 Health Risk Analysis Thresholds........................................................................................................ 15
4.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 16 5 POTENTIAL HEALTH RISK IMPACTS
5.1 Construction Health Risk Analysis..................................................................................................... 21
5.2 Operational Health Risk Analysis...................................................................................................... 23 6 REFERENCES
References....................................................................................................................................... 25 TABLES
Table 1: Sensitive Receptors................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 2: Default Age Sensitivity Factors, Fraction of Time at Home, and Daily Breathing Rates .............................. 18 Table 3: Construction Risk .................................................................................................................................... 21 Table 4: Operational Risk Assessment Results....................................................................................................... 22 Table 5: Cumulative Health Risk............................................................................................................................ 23
FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Vicinity....................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Site Vicinity .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3: Site Plan................................................................................................................................................... 4
APPENDIX
Appendix A: Modeling Data
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
A absorption factor from inhalation
ACES Advanced Collaborative Emissions Study
ASF age sensitivity factor
AB Assembly Bill
APN Assessor’s Parcel Number
APS auxiliary power system
AT averaging time
ATCM Air Toxic Control Measure
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
CARB California Air Resources Board
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CPF cancer potency factor
Cair air concentration from model
Ci air concentration of substance
DBR daily breathing rate
DOORS Diesel Off-Road Reporting System
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
DRRP Diesel Risk Reduction Plan
Dose-air dose through inhalation
EMFAC Emissions Factor Model
ED exposure duration
EF exposure frequency
°F Fahrenheit
FCAA Federal Clean Air Act
FAH fraction of time spent at home
GVWR gross vehicle weight rating
HAP hazardous air pollutant
HQ health quotient
HRA health risk assessment
kg kilograms
L liter
MICR Maximum Individual Cancer Risk
mg milligrams
gm micrograms per cubic meter
MSAT Mobile Source Air Toxic
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NED National Elevation Dataset
NESHAP National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NO2 nitrogen dioxide
NOX nitrogen oxides
O3 ozone
OEHHA Office Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
PM particulate matter
PM10 particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PERP Portable Equipment Registration Program
REL Reference Exposure Level
RELi Reference Exposure Level of substance
Riskinh-res residential inhalation cancer risk
SB Senate Bill
T-BACT toxics best available control technology
TAC Toxic Air Contaminant
U.S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VMT vehicle miles traveled
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 1
1 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Health Risk Assessment (HRA) is to evaluate potential health risks associated with Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC) including Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) resulting from the implementation of the proposed 880 Doolittle Drive Project (Project) in San Leandro. This HRA was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and guidance from the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to determine if health risks are likely to occur from the Project. Technical data is included as see Appendix A.
1.1 Project Location
The proposed Project is located at 880 Doolittle Drive, on the approximately 14.14-acre property (APNs # 77A-0741-004-02 and 77A-0741-005-00), in the City of San Leandro. Figure 1: Regional Vicinity and Figure 2: Site Vicinity depict the Project site in a regional and local context. The Project site is located in an urban area with a mix of surrounding uses including commercial, office, residential and industrial uses. The southern boundary comprises an existing railroad with commercial development beyond. The Project site’s existing land use designation is General Industrial (IG) and existing zoning designation is General Industrial (IG) Zoning District. The Project site is currently developed with an approximately 212,000 square foot (sf) industrial use building and associated parking.
1.2 Project Description
The proposed Project would demolish the existing 212,000 sf of on-site industrial use buildings and construct an approximately 244,573 sf new warehouse. The proposed development would contain approximately 15,000 sf of ancillary office use, of which 5,000 sf of office use would be mezzanine level, refer to Figure 3: Project Site Plan. The footprint of the warehouse and office use is 239,753 sf. Sixty-four loading docks would be constructed as part of the proposed warehouse, 27 on the north side and 37 on the southside of the building. The proposed Project would include surface parking with 204 parking spaces, including 6 ADA stalls. Fifty-nine trailer stalls will also be provided and located to the north of the proposed warehouse building. Vehicular access to the Project site would be provided via three driveways.
The two existing driveways (at Doolittle Drive and Hester Street) would be maintained, and a third driveway would be added from Hester Street.
The Project proposes several surface improvements, including new landscaping and reconfigured parking areas. Per City requirements (Municipal Code Section 2.12.320), proposed landscaping would comprise five percent of the Project site. The Project site has a general plan land use designation of General Industrial (IG) and is zoned Industrial General (IG). The IG designation may contain a wide range of manufacturing, transportation, food and beverage processing, technology, warehousing, vehicle storage, office-flex, and distribution uses. The IG zone permits new storage or wholesale/retail distribution facility warehouse uses with the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). 880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Source: USGS, 2022
Figure 1: Regional Location Map
wy
Airp
ort
Dr
San Leandro Creek
98th Ave
61 112
Warden
Ave
Bigge St
Empire
Rd
n St
Do u
glas A
105th Ave
Preda St
Hun te
r
Av
e
B
e
rgedo Dr
A
rth
u
r
Ave
Earhart Rd
Martin Blvd
Ron Cowan Pkwy
Whitney St
Adams
Ave
Pardee Dr
Metropolitan
Golf Links
13 ft
112
Fairway Dr
Airport
Dr
Airport Dr
Williams St
Leonard Dr
Neptune
Dr
Marina Blvd
Davis St
Merced St
Doolittle
Dr
Oyster Bay
Mulford
Mulford
Gardens
Pershing Dr
Alvarado
St
San Leandro Blv
Sa
Williams St
Cedar Av
Ma
Kaiser
Permanente-San
Leandro
California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA Project Site
3rd St
S a n
F r a n c i s c o
Marina District
Bayview
District
Mission
District
Chinatown
San Francisco
Millbrae
Bayshore
South San
Francisco
San Bruno
S a n B r u n o
M o u n t a i n
S a n A n d r e a s R i f t Z o n e
17 Cr
ow Canyon Rd
MacArthur Fwy
Redwoo d Rd
St Marys Rd
Skyline Blvd
Park Bl vd
San Leandro St
Oakland Int'l
Airport
San Leandro
Canyon
Alameda
Berkeley
Oakland
S a n R a m o n V a l l e y
L a s T r a mp a s R i d g e
Nimitz Fwy
92 Huntwood Ave
Castro Valley
Union Ci ty
Hayward
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau o Management, EPA, NPS,
880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Figure 2: Project Vicinity Map
Source: Nearmap, 2022
Doolittle Drive
Project Site
Legend
Hester Street
Carden Street
Whitney Street
880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Figure 3: Conceptual Site Plan
Source: HPA Architecture, 2022
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 5
2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 Climate
The Project is within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB), which comprises all of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties, the southern portion of Sonoma, and the southwestern portion of Solano County. SFBAAB is characterized by complex terrain, consisting of coastal mountain ranges, inland valleys, and bays, which distort normal wind flow patterns.
The Coast Range splits resulting in a western coast gap, Golden Gate, and an eastern coast gap, Carquinez Strait, which allow air to flow in and out of the SFBAAB and the Central Valley.
The climate is dominated by the strength and location of a semi-permanent, subtropical high-pressure cell. During the summer, the Pacific high-pressure cell is centered over the northeastern Pacific Ocean resulting in stable meteorological conditions and a steady northwesterly wind flow. Upwelling of cold ocean water from below to the surface because of the northwesterly flow produces a band of cold water off the California coast. The cool and moisture-laden air approaching the coast from the Pacific Ocean is further cooled by the presence of the cold-water band resulting in condensation and the presence of fog and stratus clouds along the Northern California coast.
In the winter, the Pacific high-pressure cell weakens and shifts southward resulting in wind flow offshore, the absence of upwelling, and the occurrence of storms. Weak inversions coupled with moderate winds result in a low air pollution potential.
2.2 Toxic Air Contaminants
Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) are airborne substances capable of causing short‐term (acute) and long‐ term (chronic or carcinogenic, i.e., cancer causing) adverse human health effects (i.e., injury or illness).
TACs include both organic and inorganic chemical substances. They may be emitted from a variety of common sources including gasoline stations, automobiles, dry cleaners, industrial operations, and painting operations. The current California list of TACs includes approximately 200 compounds, including particulate emissions from diesel‐fueled engines.
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) is a term used by the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) that includes a variety of pollutants generated or emitted by industrial production activities. Identified as TACs under the California Clean Air Act (CCAA), have been singled out through ambient air quality data as being the most substantial health risk in California. Direct exposure to these pollutants has been shown to cause cancer, birth defects, damage to the brain and nervous system, and respiratory disorders. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) provides emission inventories for only the larger air basins.
Industrial facilities and mobile sources are significant sources of TACs. The electronics industry, including semiconductor manufacturing, has the potential to contaminate both air and water due to the highly toxic chlorinated solvents commonly used in semiconductor production processes. In addition to industrial sources, various common urban facilities also produce TAC emissions, such as gasoline stations (benzene), hospitals (ethylene oxide), and dry cleaners (perchloroethylene). Automobile exhaust also contains TACs such as benzene and 1,3-butadiene. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) was identified as a TAC by CARB in 1998. DPM differs from other TACs in that it is not a single substance but rather a complex mixture of City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 6
hundreds of substances. BAAQMD research indicates that mobile-source emissions of DPM, benzene, and 1,3-butadiene represent a substantial portion of the ambient background risk from TACs in the SFBAAB.
TACs do not have ambient air quality standards because no safe levels of TACs can be determined. Instead, TAC impacts are evaluated by calculating the health risks associated with a given exposure. The requirements of the Air Toxic “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act (Assembly Bill [AB] 2588) apply to facilities that use, produce, or emit toxic chemicals. Facilities subject to the toxic emission inventory requirements of the act must prepare and submit toxic emission inventory plans and reports, and periodically update those reports.
Toxic contaminants often result from fugitive emissions during fuel storage and transfer activities, and from leaking valves and pipes. For example, the electronics industry, including semiconductor manufacturing, uses highly toxic chlorinated solvents in semiconductor production processes. Sources of air toxics go beyond industry, however. Automobile exhaust also contains toxic air pollutants such as benzene and 1,3‐butadiene.
In California, on‐road diesel‐fueled engines contribute approximately 24 percent of the statewide total DPM emissions, with an additional 71 percent attributed to other mobile sources such as construction and mining equipment, agricultural equipment, and transport refrigeration units. Stationary sources contribute about 5 percent of total DPM. CARB has developed several plans and programs to reduce diesel emissions such as the Diesel Risk Reduction Plan (DRRP), the Statewide Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP), and the Diesel Off‐Road Reporting System (DOORS). The PERP and DOORS programs allow owners or operators of portable engines and certain other types of equipment to register their units to operate their equipment throughout California without having to obtain individual permits from local air districts.
As stated above, diesel exhaust and many individual substances contained in it (including arsenic, benzene, formaldehyde, and nickel) have the potential to contribute to mutations in cells that can lead to cancer. Long‐term exposure to diesel exhaust particles poses the highest cancer risk of any TAC evaluated by OEHHA. CARB estimates that about 70 percent of the cancer risk that the average Californian faces from breathing toxic air pollutants stems from diesel exhaust particles.
Exposure to diesel exhaust can have immediate health effects. Diesel exhaust can irritate the eyes, nose, throat, and lungs, and it can cause coughs, headaches, lightheadedness, and nausea. In studies with human volunteers, diesel exhaust particles made people with allergies more susceptible to the materials to which they are allergic, such as dust and pollen. Exposure to diesel exhaust also causes inflammation in the lungs, which may aggravate chronic respiratory symptoms and increase the frequency or intensity of asthma attacks.
Diesel engines are a major source of fine particulate pollution. The elderly and people with emphysema, asthma, and chronic heart and lung disease are especially sensitive to fine‐particle pollution. Numerous studies have linked elevated particle levels in the air to increased hospital admissions, emergency room visits, asthma attacks, and premature deaths among those suffering from respiratory problems. Because children’s lungs and respiratory systems are still developing, they are also more susceptible than healthy adults to fine particles. Exposure to fine particles is associated with increased frequency of childhood City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 7
illnesses and can also reduce lung function in children. California has identified diesel exhaust particles as a carcinogen.
2.3 Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive populations are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the general population.
Sensitive receptors in proximity to localized sources of toxics are of particular concern. Land uses considered sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, long‐term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes.
The Project site is located at the end of Doolittle Drive in the City of San Leandro. The surrounding land uses are predominantly general industrial and industrial park, with single-family residences located to the northeast. Table 1: Sensitive Receptors, lists the distances and locations of nearby sensitive receptors. See Figure 4: Sensitive Receptor Locations for locations of nearest sensitive receptors.
Table 1: Sensitive Receptors
Receptor Description Distance and Direction from the Project Site Single-Family Residences 500 feet northeast
Metropolitan Golf Links Course 700 feet west
Holiday Inn 0.50 miles north
Source: Google Earth, 2022.
880 Doolittle Drive Project Not to scale
Figure 4: Sensitive Receptor Locations
Source: Nearmap, 2022
Legend
Sensitive Receptor
Location 1
Project site
1 2
3 Single Family Residences
Metropolitan Gold Links Course
Holiday Inn Hotel
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 9
3 REGULATORY SETTING
3.1 Federal
Federal Clean Air Act
The FCAA was amended in 1990 to address the numerous air pollutants that are known to cause or may reasonably be anticipated to cause adverse effects to human health or adverse environmental effects. 188 specific pollutants and chemical groups were initially identified as HAPs, and the list has been modified over time. The FCAA Amendments included new regulatory programs to control acid deposition and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits.
In 2001, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) issued its first Mobile Source Air Toxics Rule, which identified 21 mobile source air toxic (MSAT) compounds as being HAPs that required regulation. A subset of six of these MSAT compounds were identified as having the greatest influence on health: benzene, 1,3‐butadiene, formaldehyde, acrolein, acetaldehyde, and DPM. More recently, the U.S.
EPA issued a second MSAT Rule in February 2007, which generally supported the findings in the first rule and provided additional recommendations of compounds having the greatest impact on health. The rule also identified several engine emission certification standards that must be implemented. Unlike the criteria pollutants, toxics do not have National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) making evaluation of their impacts less uniform.
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
Section 112 of the FCAA Amendments governs the federal control program for HAPs. NESHAPs are issued to limit the release of specified HAPs from specific industrial sectors. These standards are technology‐ based, meaning that they represent the best available control technology an industrial sector could afford.
The level of emissions controls required by NESHAPs are not based on health risk considerations because allowable releases and resulting concentrations have not been determined to be safe for the public. The FCAA does not establish air quality standards for HAPs that define legally acceptable concentrations of these pollutants in ambient air.
Federal Emissions Standards for On-Road Trucks
To reduce emissions from on-road, heavy-duty diesel trucks, the U.S. EPA established a series of increasingly strict emission standards for new engines, starting in 1988. The U.S. EPA promulgated the final and cleanest standards with the 2007 Heavy-Duty Highway Rule.1The PM emission standard of 0.01 gram per horsepower-hour (g/hp-hr) is required for new vehicles beginning with model year 2007. Also, the NOX and nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) standards of 0.20 g/hp-hr and 0.14 g/hp-hr, respectively, 1 United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements, Final Rule. 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 69, 80, and 86. January 18, 2001.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 10
were phased in together between 2007 and 2010 on a percent of sales basis: 50 percent from 2007 to 2009 and 100 percent in 2010.
Emission Standards for Nonroad Diesel Engines
To reduce emissions from off-road diesel equipment, the U.S. EPA established a series of cleaner emission standards for new off-road diesel engines. Tier 1 standards were phased in from 1996 to 2000 (year of manufacture), depending on the engine horsepower category. Tier 2 standards were phased in from 2001 to 2006. Tier 3 standards were phased in from 2006 to 2008. Tier 4 standards, which generally require add-on emission control equipment to attain them, are being phased in from 2008 to 2015.
3.2 State of California
California Air Resources Board
CARB’s statewide comprehensive air toxics program was established in 1983 with AB 1807 the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act (Tanner Air Toxics Act of 1983). AB 1807 created California's program to reduce exposure to air toxics and sets forth a formal procedure for CARB to designate substances as TACs. Once a TAC is identified, CARB adopts an airborne toxics control measure (ATCM) for sources that emit designated TACs. If there is a safe threshold for a substance at which there is no toxic effect, the control measure must reduce exposure to below that threshold. If there is no safe threshold, the measure must incorporate toxics best available control technology (T‐BACT) to minimize emissions.
CARB also administers the State’s mobile source emissions control program and oversees air quality programs established by State statute, such as AB 2588. Under AB 2588, TAC emissions from individual facilities are quantified and prioritized by the air quality management district or air pollution control district. High priority facilities are required to perform a health risk assessment and, if specific thresholds are exceeded, required to communicate the results to the public in the form of notices and public meetings. In September 1992, the AB 2588 was amended by Senate Bill (SB) 1731 which required facilities that pose a significant health risk to the community to reduce their risk through a risk management plan.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan
The identification of DPM as a TAC in 1998 led CARB to adopt the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel‐Fueled Engines and Vehicles (DRRP) in October 2000. The DRRP's goals include an 85 percent reduction in DPM by 2020 from the 2000 baseline2. CARB estimates that emissions of DPM in 2035 will be less than half those in 2010, further reducing statewide cancer risk and non-cancer health effects.3The DRRP includes regulations to establish cleaner new diesel engines, cleaner in‐use diesel engines (retrofits), and cleaner diesel fuel.
2 California Air Resources Board, Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel‐Fueled Engines and Vehicles, October 2000.
3 California Air Resources Board, Overview: Diesel Exhaust & Health, available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/overview-diesel-exhaustand-health, accessed on April 2021.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 11
Truck and Bus Regulation Reducing Emissions from Existing Diesel Vehicles On December 12, 2008, CARB approved the Truck and Bus Regulation to significantly reduce PM and NOX emissions from existing diesel vehicles operating in California. The regulation requires PM retrofits on all diesel trucks and buses that operate in California (i.e., existing vehicles are required to be upgraded to reduce emissions). Heavier trucks must be retrofitted with PM filters beginning January 1, 2012, and older trucks must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1, 2023, nearly all trucks and buses would need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent.
The regulation applies to most privately-owned and federally‐owned diesel fueled trucks and buses and to privately and publicly owned school buses with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds. Small fleets with three or fewer diesel trucks can delay compliance for heavier trucks and there are several extensions for low‐mileage construction trucks, early PM filter retrofits, adding cleaner vehicles, and other situations. Privately and publicly owned school buses have different requirements.
Heavy‐Duty Vehicle Idling Emission Reduction Program
The purpose of the CARB ATCM to Limit Diesel‐Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling is to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and criteria pollutants by limiting the idling of diesel‐fueled commercial vehicles. The driver of any vehicle subject to this ATCM is prohibited from idling the vehicle’s primary diesel engine for greater than five minutes at any location and is prohibited from idling a diesel‐ fueled auxiliary power system (APS) for more than five minutes to power a heater, air conditioner, or any ancillary equipment on the vehicle if it has a sleeper berth and the truck is located within 100 feet of a restricted area (homes and schools).
CARB Final Regulation Order, Requirements to Reduce Idling Emissions from New and In‐Use Trucks, beginning in 2008, would require that new 2008 and subsequent model‐year heavy‐duty diesel engines be equipped with an engine shutdown system that automatically shuts down the engine after 300 seconds of continuous idling operation once the vehicle is stopped, the transmission is set to “neutral” or “park”, and the parking brake is engaged.
CalEnviroScreen
OEHHA has developed CalEnviroScreen 4.0, which is a mapping tool that helps identify California communities that are most affected by many sources of pollution, and where people are often especially vulnerable to pollution’s effects. CalEnviroScreen uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic information to produce scores for every census tract in the State. The scores are mapped so that different communities can be compared. An area with a high score is one that experiences a much higher pollution burden than areas with low scores.
According to CalEnviroScreen, the Project site is located within Census Tract 6001441503, which is within the 40-45 percentile. However, the nearest sensitive receptors to the east are located within the 25-30 percentile (Census Tract 6001443321) and 15-20 percentile (Census Tract 6001443322). It should be noted that the CalEnviroScreen scores are not an expression of health risk, and do not provide quantitative information on increases in cumulative impacts for specific sites or projects. Further, as a comparative City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 12
screening tool, the results do not provide a basis for determining when differences between scores are significant in relation to public health or the environment.
CARB Advanced Clean Truck Regulation
CARB adopted the Advanced Clean Truck Regulation in June 2020 requiring truck manufacturers to transition from diesel trucks and vans to electric zero-emission trucks beginning in 2024. By 2045, every new truck sold in California is required to be zero-emission. This rule directly addresses disproportionate risks and health and pollution burdens and puts California on the path for an all zero-emission short-haul drayage fleet in ports and railyards by 2035, and zero-emission “last-mile” delivery trucks and vans by 2040. The Advanced Clean Truck Regulation accelerates the transition of zero-emission medium-and heavy-duty vehicles from Class 2b to Class 8. The regulation has two components including a manufacturer sales requirement, and a reporting requirement:
▪ Zero-Emission Truck Sales: Manufacturers who certify Class 2b through 8 chassis or complete vehicles with combustion engines are required to sell zero-emission trucks as an increasing percentage of their annual California sales from 2024 to 2035. By 2035, zero-emission truck/chassis sales need to be 55 percent of Class 2b – 3 truck sales, 75 percent of Class 4 – 8 straight truck sales, and 40 percent of truck tractor sales. ▪ Company and Fleet Reporting: Large employers including retailers, manufacturers, brokers and others would be required to report information about shipments and shuttle services. Fleet owners, with 50 or more trucks, would be required to report about their existing fleet operations.
This information would help identify future strategies to ensure that fleets purchase available zero-emission trucks and place them in service where suitable to meet their needs.
Executive Order N-79-20
Signed in September 2020, Executive Order N-79-20 establishes as a goal that where feasible, all new passenger cars and trucks, as well as all drayage/cargo trucks and off-road vehicles and equipment, sold in California, will be zero-emission by 2035. The executive order sets a similar goal requiring that all medium and heavy-duty vehicles will be zero-emission by 2045 where feasible. It also directs CARB to develop and propose rulemaking for passenger vehicles and trucks, medium-and heavy-duty fleets where feasible, drayage trucks, and off-road vehicles and equipment “requiring increasing volumes” of new zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) “towards the target of 100 percent.” The executive order directs the California Environmental Protection Agency, the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM), and the California Natural Resources Agency to transition and repurpose oil production facilities with a goal toward meeting carbon neutrality by 2045. Executive Order N-79-20 builds upon the CARB Advanced Clean Trucks regulation, which was adopted by CARB in July 2020.
3.3 Regional
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
The BAAQMD is the regional agency tasked with managing air quality in the region and has regulated TACs since the 1980s. The CCAA provides the BAAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources and regulate stationary source emissions. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. An example of this would be the motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall, and on highways. As a State agency, CARB regulates motor City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 13
vehicles and fuels for their emissions. The BAAQMD has published California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Guidelines that are used in this assessment to evaluate air quality impacts of projects.
Under BAAQMD Regulation 2-1 (General Permit Requirements), Regulation 2-2 (New Source Review), and Regulation 2-5 (New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants), all nonexempt sources that possess the potential to emit TACs are required to obtain permits from BAAQMD. Permits may be granted to these operations if they are constructed and operated in accordance with applicable regulations, including new source review standards and air toxics control measures. The BAAQMD limits emissions and public exposure to TACs through a number of programs. Section 301 of Regulation 2, Rule 2 requires Best Available Control Technology (BACT) is triggered for any new or modified source with the potential to emit specific levels of pollutants. The BAAQMD prioritizes TAC-emitting stationary sources for regulation based on the quantity and toxicity of the TAC emissions and the proximity of the facilities to sensitive receptors.
Community Air Risk Evaluation Program
The BAAQMD’s Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) program estimates and reports both local and regional impacts of TACs in the Bay Area. The objective of the CARE Program is to reduce health impacts linked to local air quality. The goals of the CARE Program are to: (1) identify areas where air pollution contributes most to health impacts and where populations are most vulnerable to air pollution; (2) apply sound scientific methods and strategies to reduce health impacts in these areas; and (3) engage community groups and other agencies to develop additional actions to reduce local health impacts.
Information from the CARE program is used by the BAAQMD to design and focus effective mitigation measures in areas with highest impacts.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 14
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY
4.1 Health Risk Analysis Thresholds
Project health risks are determined by examining the types and levels of air toxics generated and the associated impacts on factors that affect air quality. The BAAQMD publishes the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Guidelines, which were most recently updated in April 2022. The BAAQMD thresholds for air toxic emissions that are used for this project are shown below:
Individual Projects:
• Excess Cancer Risk: Emit contaminants that exceed the maximum individual cancer risk of 10 in one million.
• Non‐Cancer Risk: Emit contaminants that exceed the maximum hazard quotient of 1.0 in one million.
• Ambient PM2.5 Concentration: Incremental increase in average annual PM2.5 concentration of greater than 0.3 μg/m3
Cumulative Thresholds:
• Excess Cancer Risk: Emit contaminants that would contribute to cumulative emissions, resulting in an exceedance of the maximum individual cancer risk of 100 in one million. • Non‐Cancer Risk: Emit contaminants that that would contribute to cumulative emissions, resulting in an exceedance of the maximum hazard quotient of 10.0 in one million. • Ambient PM2.5 Concentration: Incremental increase in average cumulative annual PM2.5 concentration of greater than 0.8 μg/m3
Cancer risk is expressed in terms of expected incremental incidence per million population. The BAAQMD has established an individual project incidence rate of 10 persons per million as the maximum acceptable incremental cancer risk. This threshold serves to determine if a given project has a potentially significant development‐specific and cumulative impact. The 10 in one million standard is a health‐protective significance threshold. A risk level of 10 in one million implies a likelihood that up to 10 persons, out of one million equally exposed people would contract cancer if exposed continuously (24 hours per day) to the levels of toxic air contaminants over a specified duration of time. This risk would be an excess cancer that is in addition to any cancer risk borne by a person not exposed to these air toxics. To put this risk in perspective, the risk of dying from accidental drowning is 1,000 in one million which is 100 times more than the BAAQMD’s threshold of 10 in one million.
The BAAQMD has also established non‐carcinogenic risk parameters for use in HRAs. Noncarcinogenic risks are quantified by calculating a hazard index (HI), expressed as the ratio between the ambient pollutant concentration and its toxicity or Reference Exposure Level (REL). An REL is a concentration at or below which health effects are not likely to occur. A HI less than 1.0 means that adverse health effects are not expected. Within this analysis, non‐carcinogenic exposures of less than 1.0 are considered less than significant.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 15
The 2022 BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommend assessing impacts within 1,000 feet of the Project. The 1,000-foot radius is consistent with findings in CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook (2005) and the California Health & Safety Code §42301.6 (Notice for Possible Source Near School). The CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook found that TAC concentrations are reduced substantially at a distance 1,000 feet downwind from sources such as freeways or large distribution centers.
4.2 Methodology
This HRA evaluates potential health risks associated with the emission of diesel particulate matter resulting from the implementation of the proposed Project. Construction equipment and associated heavy-duty truck traffic generate diesel exhaust, which is a known TAC. Diesel exhaust from construction equipment operating at the site poses a health risk to nearby sensitive receptors. Operational activities would also include the use of heavy-duty diesel trucks.
Construction Risk
Construction would generate DPM emissions from the use of off-road diesel equipment required for demolition, grading and excavation, paving, and other construction activities. For construction activity, DPM is the primary toxic air contaminant of concern. On-road diesel-powered haul trucks traveling to and from the construction area to deliver materials and equipment are less of a concern because they would not stay on the site for long durations. Diesel exhaust from construction equipment operating at the site potentially poses a health risk to nearby sensitive receptors. The closest sensitive receptors to the Project site are the residences 500 feet northeast of the Project site. However, the risk to offsite workers (approximately 100 feet) and those at the nearest recreational facility (approximately 400 feet) were evaluated as well.
Health-related risks associated with diesel-exhaust emissions are primarily linked to long-term exposure and the associated risk of contracting cancer. The use of diesel-powered construction equipment would be episodic and would occur throughout the Project site. Construction activities would limit idling to no more than five minutes, which would further reduce nearby sensitive receptors’ exposure to temporary and variable DPM emissions. Furthermore, even during the most intense year of construction, emissions of DPM would be generated from different locations on the Project site rather than in a single location because different types of construction activities (e.g., site preparation and building construction) would not occur at the same place at the same time.
Operational Sources
The truck traffic from the Project could also result in pollutant concentrations at existing receptors (including sensitive receptors, offsite workers, and recreators). Average daily trips from truck traffic to the Project were obtained from the Project Trip Generation Analysis (November 2022). Emission rates for vehicle running and idling for PM2.5 (DPM) was calculated using trip data and CARB 2021 EMission FACtor model version 1.0.2 (EMFAC)4 data for Alameda County; refer to Appendix A. The emissions rate was calculated using 2025 emissions factors since Project construction would be completed in 2025. This approach is conservative as it assumes no cleaner technology in future years. 4 California Air Resources Board, EMFAC 2021 Web Database, www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2021/, accessed December 2022.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 16
Dispersion Modeling
The air dispersion modeling for the operational risk assessment was performed using U.S. EPA AERMOD dispersion model. AERMOD is a steady‐state, multiple‐source, Gaussian dispersion model designed for use with emission sources situated in terrain where ground elevations can exceed the stack heights of the emission sources (not a factor in this case). AERMOD requires hourly meteorological data consisting of wind vector, wind speed, temperature, stability class, and mixing height. AERMOD regulatory defaults, the “Urban” modeling option for the County, and “Elevated” terrain were used for this analysis. In addition, National Elevation Dataset (NED) terrain data was imported into AERMOD for the Project.
Surface and upper air meteorological data is provided by CARB. Surface and upper air meteorological data from the Oakland International Airport Station was selected as being the most representative for meteorology based on proximity to the Project site.
The emission sources in the model are line volume sources (comprised of smaller adjacent volume sources) for the loading dock idling areas, on-site truck circulation, and off-site routes. The trailer loading areas for the site (as shown on Figure 3) are located on the north and south side of the building. Heavy duty vehicle emissions were assigned a release height of 10 feet (3.11 meters), a plume height of 20.4 feet (6.22 meters). A release height of 10 feet is the average stack height for trucks and the plume height is based on U.S. EPA guidance for vehicle volume sources. A point source was included for the emergency backup generator. Building downwash effect was applied to the proposed building.
AERMOD was run to obtain the peak 1‐hour, 24-hour and annual (period) average concentration in micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) at the nearby receivers (as shown on Figure 4). The annual average concentrations were used to calculate the Maximum Individual Cancer Risk (MICR), the maximum chronic HI. To achieve these goals, a receptor grid was placed over the Project site to cover the zone of impact.
Due to the size of the Project site, nearby sensitive receptors were modeled with a 50-meter (164.04-foot) grid spacing. In addition, National Elevation Dataset (NED) terrain data was imported into AERMOD for the Project. The modeling and analysis was prepared in accordance with the BAAQMD Modeling Guidance for AERMOD5.
Project construction would occur for over a period of up to 17 months. However, the health risk computation was performed to determine the risk of developing an excess cancer risk calculated on a 3- year exposure scenario as recommended by the BAAQMD, and thus is conservative.6The cancer risk calculations were based on applying age sensitivity weighting factors for each emissions period modeled.
Age-sensitivity factors reflect the greater sensitivity of infants and small children to cancer causing TACs.
The chronic and carcinogenic health risk calculations are based on the standardized equations contained in the OEHHA Guidance Manual. Only the risk associated with the worst‐case location of the proposed Project was assessed.
Maximum (worst case) PM2.5 exhaust construction emissions over the entire construction period were used in AERMOD to approximate construction DPM emissions. Risk levels were calculated according to the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidance document, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines (February 2015). 5 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, BAAQMD Air Toxics NSR Program Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Guidelines, January 2016. 6 The BAAQMD recommends that the cancer risk be evaluated assuming that the average daily dose for short-term exposure lasts a minimum of three years for Projects lasting three years or less (BAAQMD, BAAQMD Air Toxics NSR Program Health Risk Assessment Guidelines, December 2016).
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 17
Note that the concentration estimate developed using this methodology is conservative and is not a specific prediction of the actual concentrations that would occur at the Project site at any given point in time. Actual 1-hour and annual average concentrations are dependent on many variables, including specific distances during time periods of adverse meteorology. A health risk computation was performed to determine the risk of developing an excess cancer risk calculated on these worst-case exposure duration scenarios. The chronic and carcinogenic health risk calculations are based on the standardized equations contained in the OEHHA Guidance Manual. Only the risk associated with the worst-case location of the Project was assessed.
Risk and Hazard Assessment
Cancer Risk. Based on the OEHHA methodology, residential inhalation cancer risk from annual average DPM and benzene concentrations are calculated by multiplying the daily inhalation dose, cancer potency factor, age sensitivity factor (ASF), frequency of time spent at home, and exposure duration divided by averaging time, yielding the excess cancer risk. These factors are discussed in more detail below. It is important to note that exposure duration is based on continual heavy truck operations along nearby roadways. Exposure through inhalation (Dose‐air) is a function of breathing rate, exposure frequency, and concentration of substance in the air. To estimate cancer risk, the dose was estimated by applying the following formula to each ground‐level concentration:
Dose-air = Cair*(BR/BW)*A*EF*10-6
Where:
Dose-air = dose through inhalation (mg/kg/day)
Cair = air concentration (μg/m3) from air dispersion model (BR/BW) = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg bodyweight-day) A = inhalation absorption factor (unitless)
EF = exposure frequency (approximately 350 days per year for residential) 10-6 = conversion factor (micrograms to milligrams, liters to cubic meters) OEHHA developed ASFs to consider the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early‐life exposure. In the absence of chemical‐specific data, OEHHA recommends a default ASF presented in Table 2: Default Age Sensitivity Factors, Fraction of Time at Home, and Daily Breathing Rates. Fraction of time at home (FAH) during the day is used to adjust exposure duration and cancer risk from a specific facility’s emissions, based on the assumption that exposure to the facility’s emissions are not occurring away from home.
OEHHA recommends the FAH values presented in Table 2.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 18
Table 2: Default Age Sensitivity Factors, Fraction of Time at Home, and Daily Breathing Rates Age
Default Age Sensitivity
Factor1(ASF)
Fraction of Time at
Home (FAH)
Daily Breathing Rate
(L/kg BW-day2)
Third trimester to age 2 years 10 85% 361
Ages 2 through 15 years 3 72% 1,090
Ages 16 and greater 1 73% 745
1. Accounts for potential increased sensitivity to carcinogens during childhood.
2. 95th percentile daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg body weight-day) Source: California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015 and BAAQMD, Air Toxics NSR Program HRA Guidelines, December 2016.
To estimate the cancer risk, the dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor, the ASF, the exposure duration divided by averaging time, and the frequency of time spent at home (for residents only):
Riskinh‐res = (Doseair*CPF*ASF*(ED/AT)*FAH)
Where:
Riskinh‐res = residential inhalation cancer risk (potential chances per million) Doseair = daily dose through inhalation (mg/kg‐day)
CPF = inhalation cancer potency factor (mg/kg‐day‐1)
ASF = age sensitivity factor for a specified age group (unitless) ED = exposure duration (in years) for a specified age group AT = averaging time of lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Chronic Non‐Cancer Hazard. Non‐cancer chronic impacts are calculated by dividing the annual average concentration by the REL for that substance. The REL is defined as the concentration at which no adverse non‐cancer health effects are anticipated. The following equation was used to determine the non‐cancer risk:
Hazard Quotient = Ci/RELi
Where:
Ci = Concentration in the air of substance i (annual average concentration in μg/m3) RELi = Chronic noncancer Reference Exposure Level for substance i (μg/m3) Acute Non-Cancer Hazard. The potential for acute non-cancer hazards is evaluated by comparing the maximum short-term exposure level to an acute REL. RELs are designed to protect sensitive individuals within the population. The calculation of acute non-cancer impacts is similar to the procedure for chronic non-cancer impacts. The equation is as follows:
Acute HQ = Maximum Hourly Air Concentration (μg/m3) / Acute REL (μg/m3) City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 19
Health Risk Computation
A health risk computation was performed to determine the risk of developing an excess cancer risk calculated on a 30‐year exposure scenario using CARB’s Risk Assessment Stand Alone Tool (RAST). Health risk were analyzed at the point of maximum impact and are a conservative estimate. The pollutant concentrations are then used to estimate the long-term cancer health risk to an individual as well as the non-cancer chronic health index.
The off-site impacts would occur from the diesel trucks accessing the proposed Project. The cancer and chronic health risks are based on the annual average concentration of PM2.5. As DPM does not have shortterm toxicity values, acute risks were not calculated for this Project. The chronic and carcinogenic health risk calculations are based on the standardized equations contained in the U.S. EPA Human Health Evaluation Manual (1991) and the OEHHA Guidance Manual (2015).
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 20
5 POTENTIAL HEALTH RISK IMPACTS
CARB identified DPM as a TAC in 1998. Mobile sources (including trucks, buses, automobiles, trains, ships, and farm equipment) are by far the largest source of diesel emissions. The exhaust from diesel engines includes hundreds of different gaseous and particulate components, many of which are toxic. Diesel exhaust is composed of two phases, either gas or particulate – both contribute to the risk. The gas phase is composed of many of the urban TACs, such as acetaldehyde, acrolein, benzene, 1,3‐butadiene, formaldehyde, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The particulate phase has many different types that can be classified by size or composition. The sizes of diesel particulates of greatest health concern are fine and ultrafine particles. These particles may be composed of elemental carbon with adsorbed compounds such as organics, sulfates, nitrates, metals, and other trace elements. Diesel exhaust is emitted from a broad range of on‐ and off‐road diesel engines. As the Project includes construction near sensitive receptors and proposes heavy-duty trucks operations within the BAAQMD 1,000-foot zone of influence, a quantitative analysis of health risk impacts from TACs was performed for both Project construction and operations.
5.1 Construction Health Risk Analysis
Construction equipment and associated heavy-duty truck traffic generate diesel exhaust, which is a known toxic air contaminants (TAC). Diesel exhaust from construction equipment operating at the site poses a health risk to nearby sensitive receptors. The closest sensitive receptors to the Project site are the singlefamily residences approximately 500 feet northeast. BAAQMD provides guidance for evaluating impacts from TACs in its CEQA Air Quality Guidelines document. As noted therein, an incremental cancer risk of greater than 10 cases per million at the Maximally Exposed Individual (MEI) will result in a significant impact. The BAAQMD considers exposure to annual PM2.5 concentrations that exceed 0.3 μg/m3from a single source to be significant. The BAAQMD significance threshold for non-cancer hazards is 1.0.
Project construction would generate diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions from the use of off-road diesel equipment required for grading and excavation, paving, and other construction activities. For construction activity, DPM is the primary toxic air contaminant of concern. On-road diesel-powered haul trucks traveling to and from the construction area to deliver materials and equipment are less of a concern because they would not stay on the site for long durations. Diesel exhaust from construction equipment operating at the site poses a health risk to nearby sensitive receptors.
The amount to which the receptors are exposed (a function of concentration and duration of exposure) is the primary factor used to determine health risk (i.e., potential exposure to TAC emission levels that exceed applicable standards). On-road diesel-powered haul trucks traveling to and from the construction area to deliver materials and equipment are less of a concern because they would not stay on the site for long durations. Construction is temporary and would be transient throughout the site (i.e. move from location to location) and would not generate emissions in a fixed location for extended periods of time.
Construction is subject to and would comply with California regulations (e.g., California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 3, Article 1, Chapter 10, Sections 2485 and 2449), which reduce DPM and criteria pollutant emissions from in-use off-road diesel-fueled vehicles and limit the idling of heavy-duty construction equipment to no more than five minutes. These regulations would further reduce nearby sensitive receptors’ exposure to temporary and variable DPM emissions. Given the temporary and City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 21
intermittent nature of construction activities likely to occur within specific locations in the Project site (i.e., construction is not likely to occur in any one location for an extended time), the dose of DPM of any one receptor is exposed to would be limited.
PM2.5 construction emissions rates in grams per second were calculated from the total annual on-site exhaust emissions reported in CalEEMod (0.20 tons) total during construction. Annual emissions were converted to grams per second and these emissions rates were input into AERMOD. Although Project construction would occur for over a period of 17 months, the health risk computation was performed to determine the risk of developing an excess cancer risk calculated on a 3-year exposure scenario as recommended by the BAAQMD, and thus is conservative.7
As noted above, maximum (worst case) PM2.5 exhaust construction emissions over the entire construction period were used in AERMOD to approximate construction DPM emissions. Risk levels were calculated with the CARB Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP) Risk Assessment Standalone Tool (RAST) based on the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidance document, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines (February 2015). Results of this assessment are summarized in Table 3: Construction Risk.
Table 3: Construction Risk
Exposure Scenarios
Pollutant Concentration
(µg/m3)
Cancer Risk
(per million)
Chronic Hazard
Worker 0.028 0.91 0.006
Recreation 0.001 0.07 0.000
Resident 0.004 0.53 0.001
BAAQMD Threshold 0.3 10 1.0
Threshold Exceeded? No No No
Refer to Appendix A: Modeling data.
Maximum concentration of PM2.5 during construction would be 0.028 μg/m3, which would not exceed the BAAQMD threshold of 0.3 μg/m3. The highest calculated carcinogenic risk from Project construction would be 0.91 per one million for workers, 0.07 per million for recreation users, and 0.53 per one million for residents which would all be below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 in one million. The MEI during construction are the closest sensitive receptors to the Project site, which are the residences 500 feet northeast of the Project site, the Metropolitan Golf Links Course 700 feet west of the Project site, and employees at nearby businesses (see sensitive receptor #1 in Figure 4). Non-cancer hazards for DPM would be below BAAQMD thresholds, with a chronic hazard index computed at a maximum of 0.006 for workers. Therefore, all chronic hazards would be below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 1.0. As described above, worst-case construction risk levels based on screening-level modeling (AERMOD) and conservative assumptions would be below the BAAQMD’s thresholds for construction and construction risk levels would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.
7 The BAAQMD recommends that the cancer risk be evaluated assuming that the average daily dose for short-term exposure lasts a minimum of three years for Projects lasting three years or less (BAAQMD, BAAQMD Air Toxics NSR Program Health Risk Assessment Guidelines, December 2016).
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 22
Level of Significance: Less than significant.
5.2 Operational Health Risk Analysis
Vehicle DPM emissions were estimated using emission factors for course particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) generated with the EMFAC developed by CARB. EMFAC is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by CARB to project changes in future emissions from on‐road mobile sources. EMFAC, incorporates regional motor vehicle data, information and estimates regarding the distribution of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by speed, and number of starts per day. The model includes the emissions benefits of the truck and bus rule and the previously adopted rules for other on‐road diesel equipment.
For this Project, annual average PM2.5 emission factors were generated by running EMFAC for vehicles in the BAAQMD within the Alameda County. EMFAC generates emission factors in terms of grams of pollutant emitted per vehicle activity and can calculate a matrix of emission factors at specific values of vehicle speed, temperature, and relative humidity. The model was run for heavy-duty diesel vehicles traveling along Doolittle Drive, Adams Avenue, Hester Street, and Davis Street, as well as circulating the Project site and idling at proposed loading areas. Additionally, the operational run included one emergency generator.
Based on the AERMOD outputs, the highest expected annual average diesel PM2.5 emission concentrations from diesel truck traffic near sensitive receptors would be 0.001 µg/m3. The calculations conservatively assume no cleaner technology with lower emissions in future years. As shown in Table 4: Operational Risk Assessment Results, the calculated carcinogenic risk resulting from the Project is 0.31 per million for workers, 0.15 per million for recreation, and 0.11 per million for residents which are all below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million. Chronic hazards also would be below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 1.0.
Table 4: Operational Risk Assessment Results
Exposure Scenario Pollutant
Concentration (μg/m3)
Maximum Cancer Risk
(Risk per Million) Chronic Noncancer Hazard
Worker 0.006 0.31 0.0002
Recreation 0.003 0.15 0.0002
Resident 0.002 0.11 0.0001
Threshold NA 10 in one million 1.0
Exceed Threshold? No No No
1. Refer to Appendix A: Modeling Data.
2. The maximum cancer would be experienced for workers based on worst-case exposure durations for the Project, 95th percentile breathing rates, and 30-year averaging time.
The pollutant concentrations modeled in AERMOD represent the exposure levels outdoors. The BAAQMD conservatively does not include indoor exposure adjustments for residents. However, the typical person spends the majority of time indoors rather than remaining outdoors in the same location for 24 hours a City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 23
day.8Therefore, the AERMOD outdoor pollutant concentrations are not necessarily representative of actual exposure at the Project site, and tend to overestimate exposure.
Cumulative On-Site Health Impacts
In addition to mobile sources, stationary sources within a 1,000-foot-radius of the Project site were identified using BAAQMD’s Stationary Source GIS Maps and consultation with the BAAQMD. Table 5:
Cumulative Health Risk shows TACs generated from the Project, major street, highway, rail, and stationary sources within a 1,000-foot-radius.
Table 5: Cumulative Health Risk
Emissions Sources PM2.5 (µg/m3)
Cancer Risk
(per million) Hazard
Project Construction Emissions 0.028 0.91 0.006
Project Mobile Emissions 0.002 0.11 0.0003
Major Street Sources1 0.024 1.065 0.096
Highway Sources1 0.190 11.550 0.840
Railway Sources1 0.008 5.483 0.032
Stationary Sources
California General Partnership 0.000 0.092 0.000
PCC Structural 0.374 3.302 0.382
Avis Service Center 0.000 0.000 0.000
Cumulative Health Risk Values 0.646 23.52 1.356
BAAQMD Cumulative Threshold 0.8 100 10
Threshold Exceeded? No No No
1. BAAQMD GIS data.
Source: BAAQMD’s Stationary Source Data and GIS Mapping Tools, 2021.
As described above in Table 5, cumulative impacts related to cancer risk and hazard would be less than cumulatively considerable and within acceptable limits. Additionally, cumulative residential PM2.5 would not exceed the BAAQMD’s cumulative threshold of 0.8 µg/m3, the primary contributor to those concentrations is the existing PCC Structural manufacturing site near the Project area. The facility has a high PM2.5 (0.374 µg/m3). The PCC Structural facility source represent approximately 60 percent of the total concentrations and are completely unrelated to the Project. The Project represents less than 0.17 percent of total cumulative PM 2.5 in the Project area. Therefore, the Project’s cumulative impacts would be less than significant.
8 California Air Resources Board Research Division and University of California, Berkeley, Activity Patterns of California Residents, May 1991.
The study indicates that on average, adults and adolescents in California spent almost 15 hours per day inside their homes, a nd 6 hours in other indoor locations, for a total of 21 hours (87% of the day). Approximately two hours per day were spent in transit, and just over one hour per day was spent in outdoor locations.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 24
Mitigation Measures: None required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant and less than cumulatively considerable impacts.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 25
6 REFERENCES
1. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, BAAQMD Air Toxics NSR Program Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Guidelines, January 2016.
2. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, Health Risk Assessment for Proposed Land Use Projects, July 2009.
3. California Air Resources Board Research Division and University of California, Berkeley, Activity Patterns of California Residents, May 1991.
4. California Air Resources Board, EMFAC 2017 Web Database, Available at:
www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2017/, November 2019.
5. California Air Resources Board, Overview: Diesel Exhaust & Health, available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/overview-diesel-exhaust-and-health, accessed on March 2021.
6. California Air Resources Board, Meteorological Files, Available at:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/metfiles2.htm, accessed April 2021.
7. California Air Resources Board, Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles, October 2000.
8. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines, August 2003.
9. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015.
10. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, CalEnviroScreen 3.0, https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-30, accessed April 2021.
11. City of San Leandro, 2035 General Plan, 2016.
12. City of San Leandro, Municipal Code, 2022.
13. Health Effects Institute, Advanced Collaborative Emissions Study (ACES): Lifetime Cancer and NonCancer Assessment in Rats Exposed to New-Technology Diesel Exhaust, January 2015.
14. Lakes Environmental, AERMOD View Gaussian Plume Air Dispersion Model, Version 11.0.1
15. Ralph Propper, et al., Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California, Environmental Science and Technology, September 2015.
16. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, September 2011.
City of San Leandro 880 Doolittle Drive Project
Health Risk Assessment
November 2023
Page | 26
Appendix A
Modeling Data
Construction ‐ Unmitigated
Year Tons/Year g/s Weighted Average On‐Site Rate
2024 1.04E‐01 0.002983 0.002195809
2025 3.71E‐02 0.001067
2024 2025 Total
Const Duration (Days): 218 152 370
Weighted
Vendor Hauling Vendor Hauling Trip length
2024 46 5158 7.3 20 19.89
2025 60 0 7.3 20 7.30
Tons/Year g/s g/s per mile Weighted Average Off‐Site Rate 2024 4.42E‐03 0.000127 6.39331E‐06 7.09E‐06
2025 2.05E‐03 0.000059 8.0783E‐06
Construction Route Length
(meters)
Length
(Miles)
Emissions
(g/sec per mile)
Emission Rate
(g/sec)
Doolittle Driveway 121 0.08 7.09E‐06 5.33E‐07
Hester Street 456.5 0.28 7.09E‐06 2.01E‐06
Adams Ave 114 0.07 7.09E‐06 5.02E‐07
Doolittle Drive 931.8 0.58 7.09E‐06 4.10E‐06
Davis Street 671 0.42 7.09E‐06 2.95E‐06
tons/yr tons/yr
Year Phase Exhaust PM2.5 Year Phase Exhaust PM2.5
2024 Demolition 0.0268 2024 Demolition 1.80E‐03
2024 Site Prep 2.38E‐02 2024 Site Prep 1.00E‐05
2024 Grading 2.83E‐02 2024 Grading 1.03E‐03
2024 Building 2.48E‐02 2024 Building 1.58E‐03
Total 1.04E‐01 Total 4.42E‐03
2025 Building 0.0271 2025 Building 1.98E‐03
2025 Arch Coating 1.70E‐03 2025 Arch Coating 6.00E‐05
2025 Paving 8.28E‐03 2025 Paving 1.00E‐05
Total 0.03708 Total 2.05E‐03
PM2.5 Exhaust Onsite
PM2.5 Exhaust Off‐Site
On‐Site Construction Emissions Off‐Site Construction Emissions Trips Miles
Construction
1 hr 24 hr Period
5.47E‐01 7.01E‐02 2.80E‐02
9.36E‐02 1.38E‐02 6.00E‐04
1.78E‐01 2.13E‐02 4.40E‐03
HARP 2 Risk Summary (worker)
Cancer Per 1 million Chronic Acute
INDEX POLID CONC INH_RISK RESP CONC RESP
1 9901 Diesel ExhPM 2.80E‐02 9.11E‐07 0.91 5.60E‐03 5.47E‐01 0.00E+00 2 107028 Acrolein 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.47E‐01 2.19E‐01 HARP 2 Risk Summary (recreation)
Cancer Per 1 million Chronic Acute
INDEX POLID CONC INH_RISK RESP CONC RESP
1 9901 Diesel ExhPM 6.00E‐04 7.20E‐08 0.07 1.20E‐04 9.36E‐02 0.00E+00 2 107028 Acrolein 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.36E‐02 3.74E‐02 HARP 2 Risk Summary (resident)
Cancer Per 1 million Chronic Acute
INDEX POLID CONC INH_RISK RESP CONC RESP
1 9901 Diesel ExhPM 4.40E‐03 5.28E‐07 0.53 8.80E‐04 1.78E‐01 0.00E+00 2 107028 Acrolein 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.78E‐01 7.12E‐02 Operations
1 hr 24 hr Period
0.0516 0.0139 0.0012
0.0272 0.0075 0.0009
1.16E‐02 7.10E‐03 5.00E‐04
HARP 2 Risk Summary (worker)
Cancer Per 1 million Chronic Acute
INDEX POLID CONC INH_RISK RESP CONC RESP
1 9901 Diesel ExhPM 1.20E‐03 3.12E‐07 0.31 2.40E‐04 5.16E‐02 0.00E+00 2 107028 Acrolein 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.16E‐02 2.06E‐02 HARP 2 Risk Summary (recreation)
Cancer Per 1 million Chronic Acute
INDEX POLID CONC INH_RISK RESP CONC RESP
1 9901 Diesel ExhPM 9.00E‐04 1.51E‐07 0.15 1.80E‐04 2.72E‐02 0.00E+00 2 107028 Acrolein 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.72E‐02 1.09E‐02 HARP 2 Risk Summary (resident)
Cancer Per 1 million Chronic Acute
INDEX POLID CONC INH_RISK RESP CONC RESP
1 9901 Diesel ExhPM 5.00E‐04 1.05E‐07 0.11 1.00E‐04 1.16E‐02 0.00E+00 2 107028 Acrolein 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E‐02 4.64E‐03 µg/m3
Project (Resident)
µg/m3
Project (resident)
Project (worker)
Project (Worker)
Project (rec)
Project (Recreation)
Operational Emissions Rates Calculations
Truck Route Emissions Speed
(mph)
Trips
(veh/day)
Emission Factor
(g/mi) Length (meters) Length
(mi/veh)
Emissions
(g/day)
Emission Rate
(g/sec)
Doolittle Drive 25 47 0.00044 931.8 0.58 1.21E‐02 1.40E‐07 Adams Ave 25 47 0.00044 114 0.07 1.48E‐03 1.71E‐08
Hester Street 25 47 0.00044 456.5 0.28 5.93E‐03 6.86E‐08 Davis Street 25 47 0.00044 671 0.42 8.72E‐03 1.01E‐07
On‐Site Travel 15 47 0.00051 600.3 0.37 8.92E‐03 1.03E‐07 Loading Dock Idling Speed
(mph)
Trips
(veh/day)
Emission Factor
(g/hr)
Duration
(hr/veh)
Emissions
(g/day)
Emission Rate
(g/sec)
Loading Area (north) Idle 10 2.04502E‐05 0.25 4.93E‐05 5.70E‐10 Loading Area (south) Idle 14 2.04502E‐05 0.25 7.09E‐05 8.20E‐10 Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emission Rates
Region Type: County
Region: Santa Clara (SF)
Calendar Year: 2025
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HOTSOAK and RU Speed (mph)
Idle (g/trip) 15 25 45
2.045E‐05 0.000508702 0.000444744 0.000386692
Region Calendar YeVehicle CatModel Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT Trips PM2.5_IDLEX Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6.587036146 866.5446439 131.7934192 0 0 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14386.56788 1818729.408 230139.3928 0.000459012 6.60361 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 90.78791991 10234.56318 1340.975556 0 0 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 1088.373943 75208.5745 11711.53467 3.95617E‐05 0.043058 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2642.532308 96603.42272 39369.79401 0 0 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4066.470296 165207.4735 51151.0807 0.000120117 0.488453 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 42.68505741 2798.596435 566.0439083 0 0 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1612.599975 84199.09574 32264.90031 0 0 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14347.80967 601174.9321 175547.9575 0.000279757 4.0139 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 114.3683345 5978.325429 1470.762287 0 0 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 158.2385165 7563.711613 1510.395925 3.2425E‐06 0.000513 Region Calendar YeVehicle CatModel Year Speed Fuel Total VMT PM2.5_RUNEX Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 15 Gasoline 23.03030904 5.72875E‐08 1.31935E‐06 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 15 Diesel 31517.34404 0.000346364 10.91646309 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 15 Electricity 201.9890907 0 0 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 15 Natural Gas 2990.951106 1.19098E‐05 0.035621567 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate 15 Gasoline 16758.85667 3.21658E‐05 0.539061963 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate 15 Diesel 22287.39595 0.001132035 25.23011181 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate 15 Electricity 409.2088499 0 0 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 15 Gasoline 2961.715081 8.85656E‐06 0.026230597 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 15 Diesel 31509.58507 0.00059916 18.87929387 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 15 Electricity 294.0198459 0 0 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 15 Natural Gas 397.1993255 1.18212E‐06 0.000469537 Region Calendar YeVehicle CatModel Year Speed Fuel Total VMT PM2.5_RUNEX Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 25 Gasoline 30.18617859 3.88434E‐08 1.17253E‐06 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 25 Diesel 38380.17189 0.000303967 11.66631436 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 25 Electricity 241.7727991 0 0 Alameda 2025 HHDT Aggregate 25 Natural Gas 3088.189545 8.24105E‐06 0.025449921 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate 25 Gasoline 14915.47878 1.82831E‐05 0.272700842 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate 25 Diesel 25066.02222 0.000884779 22.17788328 Alameda 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate 25 Electricity 426.8109478 0 0 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 25 Gasoline 3751.269626 5.81734E‐06 0.021822423 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 25 Diesel 57435.90102 0.000523732 30.08099895 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 25 Electricity 500.7328656 0 0 Alameda 2025 MHDT Aggregate 25 Natural Gas 619.4513732 1.11961E‐06 0.000693547 PM2.5 (exhaust)
Tons/year grams/year grams/sec
Stationary Source 0.0181 16420.0485 0.000521271
each generator 0.000130318
Road Dust Calculations
E = [k(sL)^0.91 x (W)^1.02]*(1‐P/4N)
PM10 PM2.5
E = emission factor
k = 0.0022 0.00054 particle size multiplier (lb/VMT)
sL = 0.032 0.032 surface silt loading
W = 26 26 average vehicle weight (tons)
P = 62 62 Number of days per year with >0.01 inches of rain N = 365 365 Days per period
0.91 0.91
1.02 1.02
Daily VMT PM10 PM2.5
Truck Road Dust 47 0.002549977 0.000625903 0.11984893 0.0294175 Truck Tire Wear 47 6.06056E‐05 1.51514E‐05 0.00284846 0.0007121 Truck Break Wear 47 0.000158493 5.54726E‐05 0.00744918 0.0026072 Total 0.13 0.03
g/s: 0.00068326 0.0001719 per mile
Length (M) Length (mi) percent
Scaled
Emissions Rate
Doolittle Drive 931.8 0.58 0.43 7.3687E‐05
Adams Ave 114 0.07 0.05 9.01516E‐06
Hester Street 456.5 0.28 0.21 3.61002E‐05
Davis Street 671 0.42 0.31 5.30629E‐05
Total 1.35
1 hr 24 hr Period
Project (Resident) 4.10E‐03 1.50E‐03 6.00E‐04
Project (Recreation) 8.00E‐03 4.40E‐03 1.70E‐03
Project (worker) 2.15E‐02 1.43E‐02 5.40E‐03
PM10 Emission
Factor
PM2.5
Emissions
Factor
Road Dust Emissions
(lbs/day)
Source
µg/m3
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emission Rates PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 Region Type: Sub‐Area g/mi g/mi lb/mi lb/mi
Region: Alameda (SF) TW g/mi: 0.027490228 0.006872557 6.06056E‐05 1.51514E‐05 Calendar Year: 2025 BW g/mi: 0.071891243 0.025161935 0.000158493 5.54726E‐05 Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HOTSOAK and RUNLOSS, g/vehicle/day for IDLEX and DIURN. PHEV calculated based on total VMT.
Region Calendar YeVehicle CatModel Yea Speed Fuel Population Total VMT CVMT EVMT Trips PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW TW BW PM2.5_PMTW PM2.5_PMBW TW BW Alameda (S 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6.587036 866.5446439 866.5446439 0 131.7934192 0.020000006 0.088051416 17.33089785 76.30048 0.005000001 0.030817996 4.332724 26.70517 Alameda (S 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14386.57 1818729.408 1818729.408 0 230139.3928 0.035524523 0.077579606 64609.49457 141096.3 0.008881131 0.027152862 16152.37 49383.71 Alameda (S 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 90.78792 10234.56318 0 10234.56 1340.975556 0.035024424 0.040077248 358.4596753 410.1731 0.008756106 0.014027037 89.61492 143.5606 Alameda (S 2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 1088.374 75208.5745 75208.5745 0 11711.53467 0.03600001 0.118406911 2707.509458 8905.215 0.009000003 0.041442419 676.8774 3116.825 Alameda (S 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2642.532 96603.42272 96603.42272 0 39369.79401 0.008000002 0.091000026 772.8276041 8790.914 0.002000001 0.031850009 193.2069 3076.82 Alameda (S 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4066.47 165207.4735 165207.4735 0 51151.0807 0.012000003 0.091000026 1982.490252 15033.88 0.003000001 0.031850009 495.6226 5261.86 Alameda (S 2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 42.68506 2798.596435 0 2798.596 566.0439083 0.008000002 0.045500013 22.38877792 127.3362 0.002000001 0.015925005 5.597194 44.56766 Alameda (S 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1612.6 84199.09574 84199.09574 0 32264.90031 0.012000003 0.04501744 1010.389438 3790.428 0.003000001 0.015756104 252.5974 1326.65 Alameda (S 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14347.81 601174.9321 601174.9321 0 175547.9575 0.012000003 0.045761827 7214.101253 27510.86 0.003000001 0.016016639 1803.525 9628.802 Alameda (S 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 114.3683 5978.325429 0 5978.325 1470.762287 0.012000003 0.022807202 71.73992571 136.3489 0.003000001 0.007982521 17.93498 47.72211 Alameda (S 2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 158.2385 7563.711613 7563.711613 0 1510.395925 0.012000003 0.045864333 90.76456537 346.9046 0.003000001 0.016052517 22.69114 121.4166 **
****************************************
**
** AERMOD Input Produced by:
** AERMOD View Ver. 11.0.1
** Lakes Environmental Software Inc.
** Date: 1/12/2023
** File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\880 Doolittle\880 Doolittle.ADI **
****************************************
**
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Control Pathway
****************************************
**
**
CO STARTING
TITLEONE C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\880 Doolittle\880 Doolittle.isc
MODELOPT DFAULT CONC
AVERTIME 1 8 24 PERIOD
URBANOPT 1649000 Alameda_County
POLLUTID PM_2.5
RUNORNOT RUN
ERRORFIL "880 Doolittle.err"
CO FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Source Pathway
****************************************
**
**
SO STARTING
** Source Location **
** Source ID ‐ Type ‐ X Coord. ‐ Y Coord. **
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
** DESCRSRC Construction
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.50
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 0.002195809
** Vertical Dimension = 6.22
** SZINIT = 2.89
** Nodes = 21
** 571476.533, 4175197.140, 4.16, 3.11, 3.95
** 571498.914, 4175239.548, 4.48, 3.11, 3.95
** 571676.790, 4175146.487, 4.45, 3.11, 3.95
** 571710.952, 4174990.993, 3.81, 3.11, 3.95
** 571566.060, 4174961.544, 3.68, 3.11, 3.95
** 571368.158, 4175075.808, 3.31, 3.11, 3.95
** 571495.380, 4175088.766, 3.78, 3.11, 3.95
** 571471.821, 4175170.047, 4.16, 3.11, 3.95
** 571520.118, 4175194.784, 4.92, 3.11, 3.95
** 571640.273, 4175126.461, 4.19, 3.11, 3.95
** 571672.078, 4175021.621, 3.95, 3.11, 3.95
** 571569.593, 4175001.595, 3.93, 3.11, 3.95
** 571457.685, 4175058.138, 3.65, 3.11, 3.95
** 571549.568, 4175085.232, 3.84, 3.11, 3.95
** 571503.626, 4175152.377, 4.20, 3.11, 3.95
** 571528.364, 4175162.979, 4.64, 3.11, 3.95
** 571613.179, 4175102.902, 4.04, 3.11, 3.95
** 571635.561, 4175038.113, 4.08, 3.11, 3.95
** 571576.661, 4175023.977, 3.93, 3.11, 3.95
** 571522.474, 4175054.604, 3.81, 3.11, 3.95
** 571589.619, 4175075.808, 3.95, 3.11, 3.95
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOCATION L0000518 VOLUME 571478.516 4175200.899 4.28 LOCATION L0000519 VOLUME 571482.484 4175208.416 4.36 LOCATION L0000520 VOLUME 571486.451 4175215.934 4.43 LOCATION L0000521 VOLUME 571490.419 4175223.451 4.48 LOCATION L0000522 VOLUME 571494.386 4175230.968 4.51 LOCATION L0000523 VOLUME 571498.354 4175238.485 4.51 LOCATION L0000524 VOLUME 571505.382 4175236.164 4.61 LOCATION L0000525 VOLUME 571512.913 4175232.224 4.72 LOCATION L0000526 VOLUME 571520.445 4175228.284 4.84 LOCATION L0000527 VOLUME 571527.976 4175224.343 4.93 LOCATION L0000528 VOLUME 571535.508 4175220.403 5.01 LOCATION L0000529 VOLUME 571543.039 4175216.463 5.09 LOCATION L0000530 VOLUME 571550.571 4175212.522 5.13 LOCATION L0000531 VOLUME 571558.102 4175208.582 5.16 LOCATION L0000532 VOLUME 571565.634 4175204.642 5.20 LOCATION L0000533 VOLUME 571573.165 4175200.701 5.21 LOCATION L0000534 VOLUME 571580.697 4175196.761 5.16 LOCATION L0000535 VOLUME 571588.228 4175192.821 5.07 LOCATION L0000536 VOLUME 571595.760 4175188.880 4.97 LOCATION L0000537 VOLUME 571603.291 4175184.940 4.88 LOCATION L0000538 VOLUME 571610.823 4175181.000 4.80 LOCATION L0000539 VOLUME 571618.354 4175177.059 4.72 LOCATION L0000540 VOLUME 571625.886 4175173.119 4.69 LOCATION L0000541 VOLUME 571633.417 4175169.179 4.68 LOCATION L0000542 VOLUME 571640.949 4175165.238 4.63 LOCATION L0000543 VOLUME 571648.480 4175161.298 4.61 LOCATION L0000544 VOLUME 571656.012 4175157.358 4.58 LOCATION L0000545 VOLUME 571663.543 4175153.417 4.56 LOCATION L0000546 VOLUME 571671.075 4175149.477 4.53 LOCATION L0000547 VOLUME 571677.230 4175144.485 4.50 LOCATION L0000548 VOLUME 571679.054 4175136.183 4.42 LOCATION L0000549 VOLUME 571680.878 4175127.881 4.40 LOCATION L0000550 VOLUME 571682.702 4175119.579 4.38 LOCATION L0000551 VOLUME 571684.526 4175111.277 4.36 LOCATION L0000552 VOLUME 571686.350 4175102.975 4.35 LOCATION L0000553 VOLUME 571688.173 4175094.673 4.33 LOCATION L0000554 VOLUME 571689.997 4175086.371 4.31 LOCATION L0000555 VOLUME 571691.821 4175078.069 4.28 LOCATION L0000556 VOLUME 571693.645 4175069.767 4.26 LOCATION L0000557 VOLUME 571695.469 4175061.465 4.23 LOCATION L0000558 VOLUME 571697.293 4175053.163 4.20 LOCATION L0000559 VOLUME 571699.117 4175044.861 4.16 LOCATION L0000560 VOLUME 571700.941 4175036.559 4.10 LOCATION L0000561 VOLUME 571702.765 4175028.257 4.05 LOCATION L0000562 VOLUME 571704.589 4175019.955 3.98 LOCATION L0000563 VOLUME 571706.413 4175011.653 3.93 LOCATION L0000564 VOLUME 571708.237 4175003.351 3.89 LOCATION L0000565 VOLUME 571710.061 4174995.049 3.85 LOCATION L0000566 VOLUME 571706.691 4174990.127 3.83 LOCATION L0000567 VOLUME 571698.361 4174988.434 3.83 LOCATION L0000568 VOLUME 571690.032 4174986.741 3.82 LOCATION L0000569 VOLUME 571681.702 4174985.048 3.81 LOCATION L0000570 VOLUME 571673.372 4174983.355 3.80 LOCATION L0000571 VOLUME 571665.043 4174981.662 3.80 LOCATION L0000572 VOLUME 571656.713 4174979.969 3.81 LOCATION L0000573 VOLUME 571648.383 4174978.276 3.82 LOCATION L0000574 VOLUME 571640.053 4174976.583 3.82 LOCATION L0000575 VOLUME 571631.724 4174974.890 3.81 LOCATION L0000576 VOLUME 571623.394 4174973.197 3.80 LOCATION L0000577 VOLUME 571615.064 4174971.504 3.79 LOCATION L0000578 VOLUME 571606.735 4174969.811 3.78 LOCATION L0000579 VOLUME 571598.405 4174968.118 3.76 LOCATION L0000580 VOLUME 571590.075 4174966.425 3.75 LOCATION L0000581 VOLUME 571581.746 4174964.732 3.75 LOCATION L0000582 VOLUME 571573.416 4174963.039 3.74 LOCATION L0000583 VOLUME 571565.199 4174962.040 3.72 LOCATION L0000584 VOLUME 571557.838 4174966.290 3.73 LOCATION L0000585 VOLUME 571550.477 4174970.540 3.73 LOCATION L0000586 VOLUME 571543.116 4174974.791 3.73 LOCATION L0000587 VOLUME 571535.755 4174979.041 3.71 LOCATION L0000588 VOLUME 571528.394 4174983.291 3.69 LOCATION L0000589 VOLUME 571521.033 4174987.541 3.66 LOCATION L0000590 VOLUME 571513.672 4174991.791 3.63 LOCATION L0000591 VOLUME 571506.311 4174996.041 3.61 LOCATION L0000592 VOLUME 571498.949 4175000.292 3.60 LOCATION L0000593 VOLUME 571491.588 4175004.542 3.60 LOCATION L0000594 VOLUME 571484.227 4175008.792 3.59 LOCATION L0000595 VOLUME 571476.866 4175013.042 3.59 LOCATION L0000596 VOLUME 571469.505 4175017.292 3.59 LOCATION L0000597 VOLUME 571462.144 4175021.542 3.60 LOCATION L0000598 VOLUME 571454.783 4175025.793 3.60 LOCATION L0000599 VOLUME 571447.422 4175030.043 3.60 LOCATION L0000600 VOLUME 571440.060 4175034.293 3.56 LOCATION L0000601 VOLUME 571432.699 4175038.543 3.52 LOCATION L0000602 VOLUME 571425.338 4175042.793 3.48 LOCATION L0000603 VOLUME 571417.977 4175047.044 3.43 LOCATION L0000604 VOLUME 571410.616 4175051.294 3.40 LOCATION L0000605 VOLUME 571403.255 4175055.544 3.37 LOCATION L0000606 VOLUME 571395.894 4175059.794 3.35 LOCATION L0000607 VOLUME 571388.533 4175064.044 3.34 LOCATION L0000608 VOLUME 571381.172 4175068.294 3.33 LOCATION L0000609 VOLUME 571373.810 4175072.545 3.31 LOCATION L0000610 VOLUME 571370.121 4175076.008 3.32 LOCATION L0000611 VOLUME 571378.578 4175076.869 3.35 LOCATION L0000612 VOLUME 571387.034 4175077.731 3.37 LOCATION L0000613 VOLUME 571395.490 4175078.592 3.39 LOCATION L0000614 VOLUME 571403.946 4175079.453 3.42 LOCATION L0000615 VOLUME 571412.403 4175080.314 3.45 LOCATION L0000616 VOLUME 571420.859 4175081.176 3.48 LOCATION L0000617 VOLUME 571429.315 4175082.037 3.52 LOCATION L0000618 VOLUME 571437.771 4175082.898 3.57 LOCATION L0000619 VOLUME 571446.228 4175083.760 3.61 LOCATION L0000620 VOLUME 571454.684 4175084.621 3.64 LOCATION L0000621 VOLUME 571463.140 4175085.482 3.68 LOCATION L0000622 VOLUME 571471.596 4175086.343 3.71 LOCATION L0000623 VOLUME 571480.053 4175087.205 3.74 LOCATION L0000624 VOLUME 571488.509 4175088.066 3.76 LOCATION L0000625 VOLUME 571494.937 4175090.296 3.78 LOCATION L0000626 VOLUME 571492.571 4175098.460 3.78 LOCATION L0000627 VOLUME 571490.204 4175106.624 3.79 LOCATION L0000628 VOLUME 571487.838 4175114.788 3.83 LOCATION L0000629 VOLUME 571485.472 4175122.952 3.88 LOCATION L0000630 VOLUME 571483.105 4175131.116 3.93 LOCATION L0000631 VOLUME 571480.739 4175139.279 3.99 LOCATION L0000632 VOLUME 571478.372 4175147.443 4.06 LOCATION L0000633 VOLUME 571476.006 4175155.607 4.12 LOCATION L0000634 VOLUME 571473.640 4175163.771 4.16 LOCATION L0000635 VOLUME 571473.571 4175170.943 4.19 LOCATION L0000636 VOLUME 571481.136 4175174.818 4.29 LOCATION L0000637 VOLUME 571488.702 4175178.693 4.40 LOCATION L0000638 VOLUME 571496.267 4175182.568 4.53 LOCATION L0000639 VOLUME 571503.832 4175186.443 4.64 LOCATION L0000640 VOLUME 571511.398 4175190.318 4.76 LOCATION L0000641 VOLUME 571518.963 4175194.193 4.89 LOCATION L0000642 VOLUME 571526.379 4175191.224 4.93 LOCATION L0000643 VOLUME 571533.768 4175187.023 4.95 LOCATION L0000644 VOLUME 571541.157 4175182.821 4.97 LOCATION L0000645 VOLUME 571548.546 4175178.620 4.96 LOCATION L0000646 VOLUME 571555.935 4175174.418 4.92 LOCATION L0000647 VOLUME 571563.324 4175170.216 4.88 LOCATION L0000648 VOLUME 571570.713 4175166.015 4.81 LOCATION L0000649 VOLUME 571578.102 4175161.813 4.69 LOCATION L0000650 VOLUME 571585.491 4175157.612 4.58 LOCATION L0000651 VOLUME 571592.880 4175153.410 4.47 LOCATION L0000652 VOLUME 571600.269 4175149.209 4.38 LOCATION L0000653 VOLUME 571607.658 4175145.007 4.29 LOCATION L0000654 VOLUME 571615.047 4175140.805 4.21 LOCATION L0000655 VOLUME 571622.436 4175136.604 4.15 LOCATION L0000656 VOLUME 571629.825 4175132.402 4.15 LOCATION L0000657 VOLUME 571637.214 4175128.201 4.15 LOCATION L0000658 VOLUME 571641.719 4175121.695 4.15 LOCATION L0000659 VOLUME 571644.186 4175113.561 4.16 LOCATION L0000660 VOLUME 571646.654 4175105.427 4.16 LOCATION L0000661 VOLUME 571649.121 4175097.293 4.16 LOCATION L0000662 VOLUME 571651.589 4175089.159 4.17 LOCATION L0000663 VOLUME 571654.057 4175081.025 4.18 LOCATION L0000664 VOLUME 571656.524 4175072.891 4.18 LOCATION L0000665 VOLUME 571658.992 4175064.757 4.18 LOCATION L0000666 VOLUME 571661.459 4175056.623 4.17 LOCATION L0000667 VOLUME 571663.927 4175048.489 4.16 LOCATION L0000668 VOLUME 571666.395 4175040.355 4.12 LOCATION L0000669 VOLUME 571668.862 4175032.221 4.06 LOCATION L0000670 VOLUME 571671.330 4175024.087 4.00 LOCATION L0000671 VOLUME 571666.266 4175020.485 3.97 LOCATION L0000672 VOLUME 571657.924 4175018.855 3.97 LOCATION L0000673 VOLUME 571649.581 4175017.225 3.96 LOCATION L0000674 VOLUME 571641.239 4175015.595 3.96 LOCATION L0000675 VOLUME 571632.897 4175013.965 3.97 LOCATION L0000676 VOLUME 571624.555 4175012.335 3.97 LOCATION L0000677 VOLUME 571616.212 4175010.704 3.96 LOCATION L0000678 VOLUME 571607.870 4175009.074 3.95 LOCATION L0000679 VOLUME 571599.528 4175007.444 3.93 LOCATION L0000680 VOLUME 571591.186 4175005.814 3.92 LOCATION L0000681 VOLUME 571582.844 4175004.184 3.92 LOCATION L0000682 VOLUME 571574.501 4175002.554 3.91 LOCATION L0000683 VOLUME 571566.470 4175003.173 3.91 LOCATION L0000684 VOLUME 571558.884 4175007.006 3.91 LOCATION L0000685 VOLUME 571551.297 4175010.840 3.92 LOCATION L0000686 VOLUME 571543.710 4175014.673 3.90 LOCATION L0000687 VOLUME 571536.124 4175018.506 3.83 LOCATION L0000688 VOLUME 571528.537 4175022.339 3.77 LOCATION L0000689 VOLUME 571520.951 4175026.172 3.73 LOCATION L0000690 VOLUME 571513.364 4175030.006 3.73 LOCATION L0000691 VOLUME 571505.777 4175033.839 3.73 LOCATION L0000692 VOLUME 571498.191 4175037.672 3.73 LOCATION L0000693 VOLUME 571490.604 4175041.505 3.73 LOCATION L0000694 VOLUME 571483.018 4175045.339 3.74 LOCATION L0000695 VOLUME 571475.431 4175049.172 3.73 LOCATION L0000696 VOLUME 571467.844 4175053.005 3.71 LOCATION L0000697 VOLUME 571460.258 4175056.838 3.69 LOCATION L0000698 VOLUME 571463.073 4175059.727 3.69 LOCATION L0000699 VOLUME 571471.226 4175062.131 3.72 LOCATION L0000700 VOLUME 571479.379 4175064.535 3.74 LOCATION L0000701 VOLUME 571487.532 4175066.939 3.75 LOCATION L0000702 VOLUME 571495.685 4175069.343 3.77 LOCATION L0000703 VOLUME 571503.838 4175071.747 3.79 LOCATION L0000704 VOLUME 571511.991 4175074.151 3.81 LOCATION L0000705 VOLUME 571520.144 4175076.556 3.82 LOCATION L0000706 VOLUME 571528.297 4175078.960 3.83 LOCATION L0000707 VOLUME 571536.449 4175081.364 3.83 LOCATION L0000708 VOLUME 571544.602 4175083.768 3.84 LOCATION L0000709 VOLUME 571547.691 4175087.975 3.84 LOCATION L0000710 VOLUME 571542.891 4175094.990 3.84 LOCATION L0000711 VOLUME 571538.092 4175102.005 3.84 LOCATION L0000712 VOLUME 571533.292 4175109.020 3.87 LOCATION L0000713 VOLUME 571528.492 4175116.035 3.92 LOCATION L0000714 VOLUME 571523.692 4175123.050 3.98 LOCATION L0000715 VOLUME 571518.892 4175130.065 4.03 LOCATION L0000716 VOLUME 571514.092 4175137.080 4.08 LOCATION L0000717 VOLUME 571509.293 4175144.096 4.18 LOCATION L0000718 VOLUME 571504.493 4175151.111 4.26 LOCATION L0000719 VOLUME 571510.029 4175155.121 4.37 LOCATION L0000720 VOLUME 571517.842 4175158.469 4.49 LOCATION L0000721 VOLUME 571525.654 4175161.817 4.60 LOCATION L0000722 VOLUME 571532.894 4175159.770 4.60 LOCATION L0000723 VOLUME 571539.831 4175154.857 4.53 LOCATION L0000724 VOLUME 571546.767 4175149.943 4.44 LOCATION L0000725 VOLUME 571553.703 4175145.030 4.34 LOCATION L0000726 VOLUME 571560.639 4175140.117 4.23 LOCATION L0000727 VOLUME 571567.576 4175135.204 4.14 LOCATION L0000728 VOLUME 571574.512 4175130.291 4.10 LOCATION L0000729 VOLUME 571581.448 4175125.378 4.06 LOCATION L0000730 VOLUME 571588.384 4175120.465 4.03 LOCATION L0000731 VOLUME 571595.320 4175115.551 4.01 LOCATION L0000732 VOLUME 571602.257 4175110.638 4.01 LOCATION L0000733 VOLUME 571609.193 4175105.725 4.01 LOCATION L0000734 VOLUME 571614.359 4175099.485 4.03 LOCATION L0000735 VOLUME 571617.135 4175091.450 4.04 LOCATION L0000736 VOLUME 571619.910 4175083.416 4.05 LOCATION L0000737 VOLUME 571622.686 4175075.382 4.06 LOCATION L0000738 VOLUME 571625.461 4175067.348 4.07 LOCATION L0000739 VOLUME 571628.236 4175059.314 4.07 LOCATION L0000740 VOLUME 571631.012 4175051.280 4.08 LOCATION L0000741 VOLUME 571633.787 4175043.246 4.07 LOCATION L0000742 VOLUME 571632.576 4175037.396 4.05 LOCATION L0000743 VOLUME 571624.311 4175035.413 4.03 LOCATION L0000744 VOLUME 571616.046 4175033.429 4.01 LOCATION L0000745 VOLUME 571607.780 4175031.445 3.99 LOCATION L0000746 VOLUME 571599.515 4175029.462 3.97 LOCATION L0000747 VOLUME 571591.250 4175027.478 3.96 LOCATION L0000748 VOLUME 571582.985 4175025.494 3.95 LOCATION L0000749 VOLUME 571574.923 4175024.959 3.94 LOCATION L0000750 VOLUME 571567.523 4175029.142 3.92 LOCATION L0000751 VOLUME 571560.123 4175033.324 3.90 LOCATION L0000752 VOLUME 571552.723 4175037.507 3.89 LOCATION L0000753 VOLUME 571545.323 4175041.689 3.87 LOCATION L0000754 VOLUME 571537.924 4175045.872 3.85 LOCATION L0000755 VOLUME 571530.524 4175050.054 3.83 LOCATION L0000756 VOLUME 571523.124 4175054.237 3.82 LOCATION L0000757 VOLUME 571529.868 4175056.939 3.83 LOCATION L0000758 VOLUME 571537.973 4175059.499 3.84 LOCATION L0000759 VOLUME 571546.079 4175062.058 3.85 LOCATION L0000760 VOLUME 571554.184 4175064.618 3.86 LOCATION L0000761 VOLUME 571562.289 4175067.178 3.87 LOCATION L0000762 VOLUME 571570.395 4175069.737 3.89 LOCATION L0000763 VOLUME 571578.500 4175072.297 3.91 LOCATION L0000764 VOLUME 571586.606 4175074.856 3.93 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
** DESCRSRC Doolittle Driveway Hauling
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.50
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 5.33E‐07
** Vertical Dimension = 6.22
** SZINIT = 2.89
** Nodes = 2
** 571457.211, 4175012.475, 3.53, 3.11, 3.95
** 571370.494, 4174928.103, 3.55, 3.11, 3.95
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOCATION L0000248 VOLUME 571454.165 4175009.511 3.54 LOCATION L0000249 VOLUME 571448.073 4175003.583 3.55 LOCATION L0000250 VOLUME 571441.981 4174997.656 3.54 LOCATION L0000251 VOLUME 571435.888 4174991.728 3.53 LOCATION L0000252 VOLUME 571429.796 4174985.801 3.53 LOCATION L0000253 VOLUME 571423.704 4174979.874 3.53 LOCATION L0000254 VOLUME 571417.612 4174973.946 3.55 LOCATION L0000255 VOLUME 571411.519 4174968.019 3.56 LOCATION L0000256 VOLUME 571405.427 4174962.091 3.56 LOCATION L0000257 VOLUME 571399.335 4174956.164 3.54 LOCATION L0000258 VOLUME 571393.243 4174950.236 3.57 LOCATION L0000259 VOLUME 571387.150 4174944.309 3.57 LOCATION L0000260 VOLUME 571381.058 4174938.381 3.56 LOCATION L0000261 VOLUME 571374.966 4174932.454 3.53 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
** DESCRSRC Hester Street Hauling
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.50
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 2.01E‐06
** Vertical Dimension = 6.22
** SZINIT = 2.89
** Nodes = 2
** 571463.376, 4175169.868, 4.11, 3.11, 3.95
** 571067.156, 4175396.512, 3.59, 3.11, 3.95
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOCATION L0000262 VOLUME 571459.686 4175171.978 4.07 LOCATION L0000263 VOLUME 571452.308 4175176.199 4.00 LOCATION L0000264 VOLUME 571444.930 4175180.419 3.95 LOCATION L0000265 VOLUME 571437.552 4175184.639 3.91 LOCATION L0000266 VOLUME 571430.174 4175188.860 3.88 LOCATION L0000267 VOLUME 571422.795 4175193.080 3.85 LOCATION L0000268 VOLUME 571415.417 4175197.301 3.83 LOCATION L0000269 VOLUME 571408.039 4175201.521 3.82 LOCATION L0000270 VOLUME 571400.661 4175205.742 3.80 LOCATION L0000271 VOLUME 571393.283 4175209.962 3.75 LOCATION L0000272 VOLUME 571385.905 4175214.183 3.68 LOCATION L0000273 VOLUME 571378.526 4175218.403 3.61 LOCATION L0000274 VOLUME 571371.148 4175222.623 3.56 LOCATION L0000275 VOLUME 571363.770 4175226.844 3.55 LOCATION L0000276 VOLUME 571356.392 4175231.064 3.54 LOCATION L0000277 VOLUME 571349.014 4175235.285 3.52 LOCATION L0000278 VOLUME 571341.635 4175239.505 3.53 LOCATION L0000279 VOLUME 571334.257 4175243.726 3.56 LOCATION L0000280 VOLUME 571326.879 4175247.946 3.57 LOCATION L0000281 VOLUME 571319.501 4175252.167 3.60 LOCATION L0000282 VOLUME 571312.123 4175256.387 3.65 LOCATION L0000283 VOLUME 571304.744 4175260.608 3.69 LOCATION L0000284 VOLUME 571297.366 4175264.828 3.73 LOCATION L0000285 VOLUME 571289.988 4175269.048 3.75 LOCATION L0000286 VOLUME 571282.610 4175273.269 3.77 LOCATION L0000287 VOLUME 571275.232 4175277.489 3.77 LOCATION L0000288 VOLUME 571267.853 4175281.710 3.77 LOCATION L0000289 VOLUME 571260.475 4175285.930 3.79 LOCATION L0000290 VOLUME 571253.097 4175290.151 3.81 LOCATION L0000291 VOLUME 571245.719 4175294.371 3.83 LOCATION L0000292 VOLUME 571238.341 4175298.592 3.83 LOCATION L0000293 VOLUME 571230.962 4175302.812 3.81 LOCATION L0000294 VOLUME 571223.584 4175307.032 3.77 LOCATION L0000295 VOLUME 571216.206 4175311.253 3.73 LOCATION L0000296 VOLUME 571208.828 4175315.473 3.72 LOCATION L0000297 VOLUME 571201.450 4175319.694 3.72 LOCATION L0000298 VOLUME 571194.071 4175323.914 3.73 LOCATION L0000299 VOLUME 571186.693 4175328.135 3.73 LOCATION L0000300 VOLUME 571179.315 4175332.355 3.73 LOCATION L0000301 VOLUME 571171.937 4175336.576 3.73 LOCATION L0000302 VOLUME 571164.559 4175340.796 3.73 LOCATION L0000303 VOLUME 571157.180 4175345.017 3.74 LOCATION L0000304 VOLUME 571149.802 4175349.237 3.75 LOCATION L0000305 VOLUME 571142.424 4175353.457 3.80 LOCATION L0000306 VOLUME 571135.046 4175357.678 3.83 LOCATION L0000307 VOLUME 571127.668 4175361.898 3.85 LOCATION L0000308 VOLUME 571120.289 4175366.119 3.82 LOCATION L0000309 VOLUME 571112.911 4175370.339 3.79 LOCATION L0000310 VOLUME 571105.533 4175374.560 3.76 LOCATION L0000311 VOLUME 571098.155 4175378.780 3.71 LOCATION L0000312 VOLUME 571090.777 4175383.001 3.68 LOCATION L0000313 VOLUME 571083.398 4175387.221 3.65 LOCATION L0000314 VOLUME 571076.020 4175391.441 3.60 LOCATION L0000315 VOLUME 571068.642 4175395.662 3.57 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4
** DESCRSRC Adams Ave
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.50
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 5.02E‐07
** Vertical Dimension = 6.22
** SZINIT = 2.89
** Nodes = 2
** 571063.895, 4175388.359, 3.58, 3.11, 3.95
** 571000.304, 4175293.788, 2.90, 3.11, 3.95
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOCATION L0000316 VOLUME 571061.523 4175384.833 3.55 LOCATION L0000317 VOLUME 571056.780 4175377.779 3.54 LOCATION L0000318 VOLUME 571052.037 4175370.725 3.54 LOCATION L0000319 VOLUME 571047.294 4175363.672 3.55 LOCATION L0000320 VOLUME 571042.551 4175356.618 3.54 LOCATION L0000321 VOLUME 571037.808 4175349.564 3.53 LOCATION L0000322 VOLUME 571033.065 4175342.511 3.54 LOCATION L0000323 VOLUME 571028.322 4175335.457 3.54 LOCATION L0000324 VOLUME 571023.579 4175328.403 3.58 LOCATION L0000325 VOLUME 571018.836 4175321.350 3.61 LOCATION L0000326 VOLUME 571014.093 4175314.296 3.60 LOCATION L0000327 VOLUME 571009.350 4175307.242 3.45 LOCATION L0000328 VOLUME 571004.607 4175300.189 3.24 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE5
** DESCRSRC Doolittle Drive Hauling
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.50
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 4.1E‐06
** Vertical Dimension = 6.22
** SZINIT = 2.89
** Nodes = 2
** 570998.673, 4175292.158, 2.86, 3.11, 3.95
** 571672.084, 4174648.097, 4.09, 3.11, 3.95
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOCATION L0000329 VOLUME 571001.745 4175289.220 2.87 LOCATION L0000330 VOLUME 571007.887 4175283.345 2.95 LOCATION L0000331 VOLUME 571014.030 4175277.470 3.03 LOCATION L0000332 VOLUME 571020.173 4175271.595 3.14 LOCATION L0000333 VOLUME 571026.316 4175265.720 3.27 LOCATION L0000334 VOLUME 571032.459 4175259.845 3.34 LOCATION L0000335 VOLUME 571038.601 4175253.970 3.37 LOCATION L0000336 VOLUME 571044.744 4175248.095 3.38 LOCATION L0000337 VOLUME 571050.887 4175242.220 3.40 LOCATION L0000338 VOLUME 571057.030 4175236.345 3.38 LOCATION L0000339 VOLUME 571063.172 4175230.470 3.36 LOCATION L0000340 VOLUME 571069.315 4175224.595 3.37 LOCATION L0000341 VOLUME 571075.458 4175218.720 3.42 LOCATION L0000342 VOLUME 571081.601 4175212.845 3.42 LOCATION L0000343 VOLUME 571087.744 4175206.970 3.40 LOCATION L0000344 VOLUME 571093.886 4175201.095 3.36 LOCATION L0000345 VOLUME 571100.029 4175195.220 3.32 LOCATION L0000346 VOLUME 571106.172 4175189.344 3.33 LOCATION L0000347 VOLUME 571112.315 4175183.469 3.38 LOCATION L0000348 VOLUME 571118.458 4175177.594 3.42 LOCATION L0000349 VOLUME 571124.600 4175171.719 3.45 LOCATION L0000350 VOLUME 571130.743 4175165.844 3.47 LOCATION L0000351 VOLUME 571136.886 4175159.969 3.56 LOCATION L0000352 VOLUME 571143.029 4175154.094 3.64 LOCATION L0000353 VOLUME 571149.171 4175148.219 3.66 LOCATION L0000354 VOLUME 571155.314 4175142.344 3.65 LOCATION L0000355 VOLUME 571161.457 4175136.469 3.62 LOCATION L0000356 VOLUME 571167.600 4175130.594 3.61 LOCATION L0000357 VOLUME 571173.743 4175124.719 3.60 LOCATION L0000358 VOLUME 571179.885 4175118.844 3.57 LOCATION L0000359 VOLUME 571186.028 4175112.969 3.55 LOCATION L0000360 VOLUME 571192.171 4175107.094 3.51 LOCATION L0000361 VOLUME 571198.314 4175101.219 3.48 LOCATION L0000362 VOLUME 571204.456 4175095.344 3.51 LOCATION L0000363 VOLUME 571210.599 4175089.469 3.55 LOCATION L0000364 VOLUME 571216.742 4175083.593 3.58 LOCATION L0000365 VOLUME 571222.885 4175077.718 3.57 LOCATION L0000366 VOLUME 571229.028 4175071.843 3.56 LOCATION L0000367 VOLUME 571235.170 4175065.968 3.67 LOCATION L0000368 VOLUME 571241.313 4175060.093 3.72 LOCATION L0000369 VOLUME 571247.456 4175054.218 3.72 LOCATION L0000370 VOLUME 571253.599 4175048.343 3.69 LOCATION L0000371 VOLUME 571259.741 4175042.468 3.67 LOCATION L0000372 VOLUME 571265.884 4175036.593 3.73 LOCATION L0000373 VOLUME 571272.027 4175030.718 3.84 LOCATION L0000374 VOLUME 571278.170 4175024.843 3.94 LOCATION L0000375 VOLUME 571284.313 4175018.968 3.94 LOCATION L0000376 VOLUME 571290.455 4175013.093 3.87 LOCATION L0000377 VOLUME 571296.598 4175007.218 3.76 LOCATION L0000378 VOLUME 571302.741 4175001.343 3.66 LOCATION L0000379 VOLUME 571308.884 4174995.468 3.68 LOCATION L0000380 VOLUME 571315.026 4174989.593 3.68 LOCATION L0000381 VOLUME 571321.169 4174983.718 3.66 LOCATION L0000382 VOLUME 571327.312 4174977.842 3.66 LOCATION L0000383 VOLUME 571333.455 4174971.967 3.70 LOCATION L0000384 VOLUME 571339.598 4174966.092 3.70 LOCATION L0000385 VOLUME 571345.740 4174960.217 3.66 LOCATION L0000386 VOLUME 571351.883 4174954.342 3.60 LOCATION L0000387 VOLUME 571358.026 4174948.467 3.60 LOCATION L0000388 VOLUME 571364.169 4174942.592 3.61 LOCATION L0000389 VOLUME 571370.311 4174936.717 3.58 LOCATION L0000390 VOLUME 571376.454 4174930.842 3.52 LOCATION L0000391 VOLUME 571382.597 4174924.967 3.52 LOCATION L0000392 VOLUME 571388.740 4174919.092 3.54 LOCATION L0000393 VOLUME 571394.883 4174913.217 3.65 LOCATION L0000394 VOLUME 571401.025 4174907.342 3.68 LOCATION L0000395 VOLUME 571407.168 4174901.467 3.71 LOCATION L0000396 VOLUME 571413.311 4174895.592 3.72 LOCATION L0000397 VOLUME 571419.454 4174889.717 3.72 LOCATION L0000398 VOLUME 571425.596 4174883.842 3.70 LOCATION L0000399 VOLUME 571431.739 4174877.967 3.73 LOCATION L0000400 VOLUME 571437.882 4174872.091 3.75 LOCATION L0000401 VOLUME 571444.025 4174866.216 3.76 LOCATION L0000402 VOLUME 571450.168 4174860.341 3.76 LOCATION L0000403 VOLUME 571456.310 4174854.466 3.76 LOCATION L0000404 VOLUME 571462.453 4174848.591 3.76 LOCATION L0000405 VOLUME 571468.596 4174842.716 3.75 LOCATION L0000406 VOLUME 571474.739 4174836.841 3.74 LOCATION L0000407 VOLUME 571480.881 4174830.966 3.72 LOCATION L0000408 VOLUME 571487.024 4174825.091 3.71 LOCATION L0000409 VOLUME 571493.167 4174819.216 3.72 LOCATION L0000410 VOLUME 571499.310 4174813.341 3.72 LOCATION L0000411 VOLUME 571505.453 4174807.466 3.74 LOCATION L0000412 VOLUME 571511.595 4174801.591 3.77 LOCATION L0000413 VOLUME 571517.738 4174795.716 3.81 LOCATION L0000414 VOLUME 571523.881 4174789.841 3.82 LOCATION L0000415 VOLUME 571530.024 4174783.966 3.81 LOCATION L0000416 VOLUME 571536.166 4174778.091 3.82 LOCATION L0000417 VOLUME 571542.309 4174772.216 3.84 LOCATION L0000418 VOLUME 571548.452 4174766.341 3.87 LOCATION L0000419 VOLUME 571554.595 4174760.465 3.82 LOCATION L0000420 VOLUME 571560.738 4174754.590 3.79 LOCATION L0000421 VOLUME 571566.880 4174748.715 3.79 LOCATION L0000422 VOLUME 571573.023 4174742.840 3.80 LOCATION L0000423 VOLUME 571579.166 4174736.965 3.80 LOCATION L0000424 VOLUME 571585.309 4174731.090 3.81 LOCATION L0000425 VOLUME 571591.451 4174725.215 3.83 LOCATION L0000426 VOLUME 571597.594 4174719.340 3.86 LOCATION L0000427 VOLUME 571603.737 4174713.465 3.89 LOCATION L0000428 VOLUME 571609.880 4174707.590 3.92 LOCATION L0000429 VOLUME 571616.023 4174701.715 3.95 LOCATION L0000430 VOLUME 571622.165 4174695.840 3.98 LOCATION L0000431 VOLUME 571628.308 4174689.965 3.98 LOCATION L0000432 VOLUME 571634.451 4174684.090 3.99 LOCATION L0000433 VOLUME 571640.594 4174678.215 4.00 LOCATION L0000434 VOLUME 571646.736 4174672.340 4.03 LOCATION L0000435 VOLUME 571652.879 4174666.465 4.04 LOCATION L0000436 VOLUME 571659.022 4174660.590 4.05 LOCATION L0000437 VOLUME 571665.165 4174654.714 4.06 LOCATION L0000438 VOLUME 571671.308 4174648.839 4.08 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE5
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE6
** DESCRSRC
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.50
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 2.95E‐06
** Vertical Dimension = 6.22
** SZINIT = 2.89
** Nodes = 2
** 571670.453, 4174661.141, 4.07, 3.11, 3.95
** 572301.470, 4174889.416, 7.12, 3.11, 3.95
** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOCATION L0000439 VOLUME 571674.450 4174662.587 4.08 LOCATION L0000440 VOLUME 571682.443 4174665.478 4.12 LOCATION L0000441 VOLUME 571690.436 4174668.370 4.17 LOCATION L0000442 VOLUME 571698.429 4174671.262 4.26 LOCATION L0000443 VOLUME 571706.422 4174674.153 4.40 LOCATION L0000444 VOLUME 571714.415 4174677.045 4.53 LOCATION L0000445 VOLUME 571722.408 4174679.936 4.61 LOCATION L0000446 VOLUME 571730.401 4174682.828 4.66 LOCATION L0000447 VOLUME 571738.394 4174685.719 4.73 LOCATION L0000448 VOLUME 571746.387 4174688.611 4.75 LOCATION L0000449 VOLUME 571754.381 4174691.502 4.64 LOCATION L0000450 VOLUME 571762.374 4174694.394 4.54 LOCATION L0000451 VOLUME 571770.367 4174697.285 4.47 LOCATION L0000452 VOLUME 571778.360 4174700.177 4.52 LOCATION L0000453 VOLUME 571786.353 4174703.069 4.56 LOCATION L0000454 VOLUME 571794.346 4174705.960 4.61 LOCATION L0000455 VOLUME 571802.339 4174708.852 4.69 LOCATION L0000456 VOLUME 571810.332 4174711.743 4.78 LOCATION L0000457 VOLUME 571818.325 4174714.635 4.88 LOCATION L0000458 VOLUME 571826.318 4174717.526 4.95 LOCATION L0000459 VOLUME 571834.311 4174720.418 5.03 LOCATION L0000460 VOLUME 571842.304 4174723.309 5.10 LOCATION L0000461 VOLUME 571850.297 4174726.201 5.17 LOCATION L0000462 VOLUME 571858.290 4174729.092 5.23 LOCATION L0000463 VOLUME 571866.283 4174731.984 5.29 LOCATION L0000464 VOLUME 571874.276 4174734.876 5.34 LOCATION L0000465 VOLUME 571882.269 4174737.767 5.38 LOCATION L0000466 VOLUME 571890.263 4174740.659 5.41 LOCATION L0000467 VOLUME 571898.256 4174743.550 5.49 LOCATION L0000468 VOLUME 571906.249 4174746.442 5.57 LOCATION L0000469 VOLUME 571914.242 4174749.333 5.66 LOCATION L0000470 VOLUME 571922.235 4174752.225 5.69 LOCATION L0000471 VOLUME 571930.228 4174755.116 5.72 LOCATION L0000472 VOLUME 571938.221 4174758.008 5.74 LOCATION L0000473 VOLUME 571946.214 4174760.899 5.79 LOCATION L0000474 VOLUME 571954.207 4174763.791 5.83 LOCATION L0000475 VOLUME 571962.200 4174766.683 5.85 LOCATION L0000476 VOLUME 571970.193 4174769.574 5.86 LOCATION L0000477 VOLUME 571978.186 4174772.466 5.87 LOCATION L0000478 VOLUME 571986.179 4174775.357 5.90 LOCATION L0000479 VOLUME 571994.172 4174778.249 5.92 LOCATION L0000480 VOLUME 572002.165 4174781.140 5.93 LOCATION L0000481 VOLUME 572010.158 4174784.032 5.94 LOCATION L0000482 VOLUME 572018.151 4174786.923 5.95 LOCATION L0000483 VOLUME 572026.144 4174789.815 5.95 LOCATION L0000484 VOLUME 572034.138 4174792.706 5.95 LOCATION L0000485 VOLUME 572042.131 4174795.598 5.94 LOCATION L0000486 VOLUME 572050.124 4174798.490 5.95 LOCATION L0000487 VOLUME 572058.117 4174801.381 6.00 LOCATION L0000488 VOLUME 572066.110 4174804.273 6.05 LOCATION L0000489 VOLUME 572074.103 4174807.164 6.11 LOCATION L0000490 VOLUME 572082.096 4174810.056 6.16 LOCATION L0000491 VOLUME 572090.089 4174812.947 6.21 LOCATION L0000492 VOLUME 572098.082 4174815.839 6.26 LOCATION L0000493 VOLUME 572106.075 4174818.730 6.31 LOCATION L0000494 VOLUME 572114.068 4174821.622 6.37 LOCATION L0000495 VOLUME 572122.061 4174824.513 6.47 LOCATION L0000496 VOLUME 572130.054 4174827.405 6.59 LOCATION L0000497 VOLUME 572138.047 4174830.297 6.69 LOCATION L0000498 VOLUME 572146.040 4174833.188 6.72 LOCATION L0000499 VOLUME 572154.033 4174836.080 6.71 LOCATION L0000500 VOLUME 572162.026 4174838.971 6.69 LOCATION L0000501 VOLUME 572170.020 4174841.863 6.64 LOCATION L0000502 VOLUME 572178.013 4174844.754 6.61 LOCATION L0000503 VOLUME 572186.006 4174847.646 6.62 LOCATION L0000504 VOLUME 572193.999 4174850.537 6.67 LOCATION L0000505 VOLUME 572201.992 4174853.429 6.73 LOCATION L0000506 VOLUME 572209.985 4174856.320 6.78 LOCATION L0000507 VOLUME 572217.978 4174859.212 6.85 LOCATION L0000508 VOLUME 572225.971 4174862.104 6.92 LOCATION L0000509 VOLUME 572233.964 4174864.995 6.98 LOCATION L0000510 VOLUME 572241.957 4174867.887 7.02 LOCATION L0000511 VOLUME 572249.950 4174870.778 7.05 LOCATION L0000512 VOLUME 572257.943 4174873.670 7.09 LOCATION L0000513 VOLUME 572265.936 4174876.561 7.09 LOCATION L0000514 VOLUME 572273.929 4174879.453 7.11 LOCATION L0000515 VOLUME 572281.922 4174882.344 7.14 LOCATION L0000516 VOLUME 572289.915 4174885.236 7.16 LOCATION L0000517 VOLUME 572297.908 4174888.127 7.18 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE6
** Source Parameters **
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
SRCPARAM L0000518 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000519 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000520 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000521 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000522 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000523 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000524 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000525 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000526 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000527 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000528 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000529 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000530 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000531 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000532 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000533 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000534 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000535 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000536 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000537 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000538 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000539 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000540 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000541 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000542 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000543 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000544 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000545 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000546 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000547 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000548 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000549 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000550 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000551 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000552 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000553 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000554 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000555 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000556 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000557 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000558 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000559 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000560 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000561 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000562 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000563 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000564 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000565 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000566 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000567 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000568 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000569 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000570 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000571 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000572 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000573 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000574 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000575 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000576 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000577 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000578 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000579 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000580 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000581 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000582 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000583 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000584 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000585 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000586 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000587 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000588 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000589 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000590 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000591 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000592 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000593 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000594 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000595 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000596 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000597 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000598 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000599 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000600 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000601 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000602 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000603 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000604 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000605 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000606 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000607 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000608 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000609 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000610 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000611 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000612 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000613 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000614 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000615 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000616 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000617 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000618 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000619 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000620 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000621 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000622 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000623 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000624 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000625 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000626 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000627 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000628 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000629 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000630 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000631 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000632 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000633 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000634 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000635 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000636 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000637 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000638 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000639 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000640 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000641 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000642 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000643 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000644 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000645 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000646 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000647 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000648 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000649 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000650 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000651 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000652 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000653 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000654 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000655 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000656 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000657 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000658 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000659 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000660 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000661 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000662 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000663 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000664 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000665 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000666 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000667 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000668 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000669 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000670 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000671 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000672 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000673 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000674 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000675 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000676 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000677 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000678 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000679 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000680 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000681 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000682 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000683 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000684 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000685 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000686 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000687 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000688 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000689 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000690 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000691 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000692 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000693 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000694 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000695 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000696 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000697 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000698 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000699 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000700 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000701 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000702 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000703 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000704 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000705 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000706 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000707 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000708 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000709 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000710 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000711 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000712 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000713 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000714 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000715 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000716 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000717 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000718 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000719 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000720 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000721 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000722 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000723 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000724 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000725 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000726 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000727 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000728 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000729 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000730 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000731 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000732 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000733 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000734 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000735 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000736 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000737 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000738 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000739 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000740 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000741 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000742 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000743 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000744 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000745 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000746 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000747 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000748 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000749 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000750 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000751 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000752 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000753 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000754 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000755 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000756 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000757 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000758 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000759 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000760 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000761 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000762 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000763 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000764 0.00000889 3.11 3.95 2.89 ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
SRCPARAM L0000248 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000249 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000250 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000251 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000252 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000253 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000254 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000255 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000256 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000257 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000258 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000259 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000260 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000261 0.00000003807 3.11 3.95 2.89 ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
SRCPARAM L0000262 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000263 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000264 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000265 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000266 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000267 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000268 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000269 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000270 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000271 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000272 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000273 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000274 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000275 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000276 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000277 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000278 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000279 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000280 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000281 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000282 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000283 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000284 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000285 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000286 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000287 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000288 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000289 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000290 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000291 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000292 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000293 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000294 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000295 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000296 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000297 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000298 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000299 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000300 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000301 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000302 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000303 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000304 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000305 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000306 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000307 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000308 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000309 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000310 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000311 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000312 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000313 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000314 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000315 0.00000003722 3.11 3.95 2.89 ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4
SRCPARAM L0000316 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000317 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000318 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000319 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000320 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000321 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000322 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000323 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000324 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000325 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000326 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000327 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000328 0.00000003862 3.11 3.95 2.89 ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE5
SRCPARAM L0000329 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000330 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000331 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000332 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000333 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000334 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000335 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000336 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000337 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000338 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000339 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000340 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000341 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000342 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000343 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000344 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000345 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000346 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000347 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000348 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000349 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000350 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000351 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000352 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000353 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000354 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000355 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000356 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000357 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000358 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000359 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000360 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000361 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000362 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000363 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000364 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000365 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000366 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000367 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000368 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000369 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000370 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000371 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000372 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000373 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000374 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000375 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000376 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000377 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000378 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000379 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000380 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000381 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000382 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000383 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000384 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000385 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000386 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000387 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000388 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000389 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000390 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000391 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000392 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000393 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000394 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000395 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000396 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000397 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000398 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000399 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000400 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000401 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000402 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000403 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000404 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000405 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000406 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000407 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000408 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000409 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000410 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000411 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000412 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000413 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000414 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000415 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000416 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000417 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000418 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000419 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000420 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000421 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000422 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000423 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000424 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000425 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000426 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000427 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000428 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000429 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000430 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000431 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000432 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000433 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000434 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000435 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000436 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000437 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000438 0.00000003727 3.11 3.95 2.89 ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE6
SRCPARAM L0000439 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000440 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000441 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000442 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000443 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000444 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000445 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000446 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000447 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000448 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000449 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000450 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000451 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000452 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000453 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000454 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000455 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000456 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000457 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000458 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000459 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000460 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000461 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000462 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000463 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000464 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000465 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000466 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000467 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000468 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000469 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000470 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000471 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000472 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000473 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000474 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000475 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000476 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000477 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000478 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000479 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000480 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000481 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000482 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000483 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000484 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000485 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000486 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000487 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000488 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000489 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000490 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000491 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000492 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000493 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000494 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000495 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000496 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000497 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000498 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000499 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000500 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000501 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000502 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000503 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000504 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000505 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000506 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000507 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000508 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000509 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000510 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000511 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000512 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000513 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000514 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000515 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000516 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 SRCPARAM L0000517 0.00000003734 3.11 3.95 2.89 ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
URBANSRC ALL
** Variable Emissions Type: "By Hour‐of‐Day (HROFDY)"
** Variable Emission Scenario: "Scenario 1"
EMISFACT L0000518 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000518 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000518 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000518 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000519 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000519 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000519 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000519 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000520 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000520 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000520 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000520 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000521 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000521 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000521 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000521 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000522 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000522 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000522 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000522 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000523 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000523 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000523 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000523 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000524 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000524 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000524 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000524 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000525 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000525 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000525 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000525 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000526 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000526 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000526 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000526 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000527 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000527 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000527 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000527 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000528 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000528 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000528 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000528 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000529 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000529 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000529 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000529 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000530 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000530 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000530 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000530 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000531 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000531 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000531 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000531 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000532 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000532 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000532 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000532 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000533 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000533 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000533 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000533 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000534 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000534 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000534 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000534 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000535 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000535 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000535 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000535 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000536 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000536 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000536 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000536 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000537 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000537 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000537 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000537 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000538 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000538 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000538 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000538 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000539 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000539 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000539 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000539 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000540 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000540 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000540 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000540 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000541 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000541 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000541 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000541 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000542 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000542 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000542 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000542 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000543 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000543 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000543 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000543 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000544 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000544 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000544 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000544 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000545 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000545 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000545 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000545 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000546 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000546 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000546 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000546 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000547 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000547 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000547 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000547 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000548 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000548 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000548 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000548 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000549 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000549 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000549 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000549 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000550 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000550 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000550 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000550 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000551 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000551 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000551 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000551 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000552 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000552 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000552 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000552 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000553 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000553 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000553 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000553 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000554 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000554 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000554 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000554 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000555 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000555 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000555 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000555 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000556 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000556 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000556 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000556 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000557 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000557 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000557 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000557 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000558 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000558 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000558 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000558 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000559 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000559 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000559 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000559 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000560 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000560 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000560 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000560 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000561 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000561 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000561 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000561 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000562 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000562 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000562 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000562 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000563 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000563 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000563 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000563 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000564 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000564 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000564 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000564 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000565 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000565 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000565 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000565 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000566 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000566 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000566 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000566 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000567 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000567 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000567 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000567 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000568 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000568 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000568 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000568 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000569 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000569 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000569 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000569 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000570 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000570 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000570 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000570 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000571 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000571 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000571 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000571 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000572 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000572 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000572 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000572 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000573 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000573 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000573 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000573 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000574 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000574 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000574 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000574 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000575 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000575 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000575 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000575 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000576 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000576 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000576 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000576 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000577 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000577 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000577 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000577 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000578 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000578 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000578 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000578 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000579 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000579 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000579 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000579 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000580 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000580 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000580 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000580 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000581 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000581 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000581 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000581 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000582 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000582 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000582 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000582 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000583 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000583 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000583 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000583 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000584 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000584 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000584 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000584 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000585 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000585 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000585 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000585 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000586 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000586 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000586 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000586 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000587 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000587 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000587 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000587 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000588 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000588 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000588 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000588 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000589 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000589 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000589 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000589 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000590 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000590 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000590 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000590 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000591 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000591 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000591 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000591 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000592 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000592 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000592 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000592 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000593 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000593 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000593 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000593 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000594 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000594 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000594 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000594 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000595 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000595 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000595 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000595 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000596 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000596 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000596 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000596 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000597 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000597 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000597 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000597 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000598 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000598 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000598 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000598 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000599 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000599 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000599 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000599 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000600 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000600 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000600 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000600 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000601 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000601 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000601 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000601 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000602 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000602 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000602 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000602 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000603 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000603 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000603 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000603 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000604 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000604 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000604 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000604 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000605 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000605 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000605 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000605 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000606 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000606 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000606 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000606 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000607 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000607 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000607 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000607 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000608 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000608 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000608 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000608 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000609 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000609 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000609 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000609 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000610 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000610 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000610 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000610 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000611 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000611 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000611 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000611 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000612 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000612 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000612 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000612 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000613 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000613 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000613 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000613 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000614 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000614 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000614 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000614 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000615 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000615 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000615 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000615 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000616 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000616 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000616 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000616 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000617 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000617 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000617 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000617 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000618 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000618 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000618 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000618 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000619 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000619 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000619 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000619 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000620 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000620 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000620 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000620 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000621 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000621 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000621 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000621 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000622 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000622 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000622 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000622 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000623 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000623 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000623 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000623 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000624 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000624 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000624 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000624 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000625 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000625 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000625 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000625 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000626 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000626 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000626 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000626 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000627 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000627 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000627 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000627 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000628 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000628 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000628 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000628 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000629 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000629 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000629 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000629 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000630 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000630 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000630 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000630 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000631 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000631 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000631 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000631 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000632 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000632 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000632 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000632 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000633 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000633 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000633 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000633 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000634 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000634 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000634 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000634 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000635 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000635 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000635 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000635 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000636 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000636 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000636 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000636 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000637 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000637 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000637 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000637 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000638 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000638 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000638 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000638 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000639 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000639 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000639 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000639 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000640 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000640 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000640 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000640 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000641 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000641 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000641 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000641 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000642 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000642 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000642 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000642 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000643 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000643 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000643 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000643 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000644 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000644 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000644 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000644 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000645 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000645 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000645 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000645 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000646 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000646 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000646 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000646 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000647 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000647 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000647 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000647 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000648 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000648 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000648 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000648 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000649 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000649 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000649 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000649 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000650 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000650 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000650 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000650 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000651 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000651 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000651 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000651 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000652 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000652 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000652 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000652 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000653 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000653 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000653 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000653 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000654 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000654 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000654 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000654 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000655 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000655 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000655 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000655 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000656 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000656 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000656 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000656 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000657 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000657 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000657 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000657 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000658 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000658 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000658 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000658 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000659 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000659 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000659 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000659 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000660 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000660 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000660 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000660 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000661 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000661 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000661 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000661 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000662 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000662 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000662 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000662 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000663 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000663 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000663 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000663 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000664 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000664 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000664 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000664 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000665 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000665 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000665 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000665 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000666 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000666 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000666 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000666 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000667 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000667 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000667 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000667 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000668 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000668 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000668 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000668 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000669 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000669 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000669 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000669 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000670 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000670 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000670 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000670 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000671 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000671 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000671 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000671 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000672 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000672 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000672 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000672 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000673 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000673 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000673 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000673 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000674 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000674 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000674 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000674 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000675 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000675 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000675 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000675 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000676 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000676 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000676 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000676 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000677 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000677 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000677 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000677 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000678 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000678 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000678 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000678 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000679 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000679 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000679 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000679 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000680 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000680 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000680 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000680 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000681 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000681 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000681 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000681 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000682 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000682 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000682 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000682 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000683 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000683 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000683 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000683 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000684 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000684 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000684 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000684 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000685 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000685 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000685 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000685 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000686 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000686 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000686 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000686 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000687 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000687 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000687 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000687 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000688 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000688 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000688 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000688 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000689 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000689 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000689 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000689 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000690 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000690 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000690 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000690 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000691 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000691 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000691 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000691 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000692 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000692 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000692 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000692 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000693 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000693 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000693 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000693 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000694 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000694 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000694 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000694 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000695 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000695 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000695 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000695 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000696 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000696 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000696 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000696 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000697 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000697 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000697 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000697 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000698 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000698 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000698 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000698 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000699 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000699 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000699 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000699 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000700 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000700 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000700 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000700 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000701 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000701 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000701 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000701 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000702 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000702 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000702 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000702 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000703 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000703 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000703 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000703 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000704 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000704 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000704 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000704 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000705 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000705 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000705 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000705 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000706 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000706 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000706 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000706 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000707 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000707 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000707 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000707 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000708 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000708 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000708 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000708 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000709 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000709 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000709 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000709 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000710 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000710 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000710 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000710 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000711 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000711 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000711 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000711 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000712 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000712 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000712 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000712 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000713 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000713 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000713 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000713 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000714 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000714 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000714 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000714 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000715 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000715 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000715 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000715 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000716 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000716 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000716 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000716 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000717 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000717 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000717 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000717 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000718 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000718 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000718 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000718 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000719 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000719 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000719 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000719 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000720 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000720 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000720 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000720 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000721 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000721 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000721 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000721 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000722 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000722 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000722 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000722 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000723 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000723 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000723 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000723 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000724 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000724 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000724 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000724 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000725 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000725 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000725 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000725 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000726 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000726 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000726 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000726 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000727 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000727 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000727 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000727 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000728 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000728 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000728 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000728 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000729 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000729 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000729 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000729 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000730 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000730 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000730 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000730 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000731 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000731 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000731 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000731 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000732 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000732 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000732 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000732 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000733 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000733 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000733 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000733 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000734 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000734 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000734 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000734 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000735 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000735 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000735 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000735 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000736 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000736 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000736 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000736 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000737 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000737 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000737 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000737 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000738 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000738 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000738 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000738 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000739 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000739 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000739 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000739 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000740 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000740 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000740 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000740 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000741 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000741 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000741 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000741 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000742 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000742 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000742 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000742 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000743 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000743 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000743 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000743 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000744 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000744 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000744 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000744 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000745 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000745 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000745 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000745 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000746 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000746 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000746 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000746 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000747 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000747 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000747 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000747 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000748 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000748 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000748 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000748 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000749 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000749 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000749 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000749 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000750 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000750 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000750 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000750 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000751 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000751 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000751 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000751 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000752 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000752 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000752 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000752 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000753 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000753 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000753 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000753 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000754 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000754 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000754 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000754 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000755 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000755 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000755 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000755 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000756 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000756 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000756 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000756 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000757 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000757 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000757 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000757 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000758 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000758 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000758 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000758 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000759 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000759 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000759 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000759 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000760 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000760 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000760 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000760 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000761 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000761 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000761 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000761 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000762 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000762 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000762 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000762 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000763 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000763 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000763 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000763 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000764 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000764 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000764 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000764 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000248 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000248 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000248 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000248 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000249 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000249 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000249 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000249 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000250 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000250 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000250 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000250 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000251 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000251 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000251 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000251 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000252 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000252 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000252 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000252 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000253 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000253 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000253 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000253 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000254 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000254 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000254 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000254 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000255 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000255 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000255 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000255 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000256 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000256 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000256 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000256 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000257 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000257 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000257 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000257 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000258 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000258 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000258 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000258 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000259 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000259 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000259 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000259 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000260 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000260 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000260 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000260 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000261 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000261 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000261 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000261 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000262 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000262 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000262 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000262 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000263 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000263 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000263 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000263 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000264 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000264 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000264 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000264 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000265 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000265 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000265 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000265 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000266 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000266 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000266 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000266 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000267 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000267 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000267 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000267 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000268 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000268 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000268 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000268 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000269 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000269 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000269 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000269 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000270 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000270 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000270 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000270 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000271 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000271 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000271 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000271 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000272 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000272 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000272 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000272 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000273 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000273 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000273 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000273 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000274 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000274 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000274 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000274 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000275 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000275 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000275 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000275 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000276 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000276 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000276 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000276 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000277 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000277 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000277 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000277 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000278 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000278 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000278 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000278 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000279 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000279 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000279 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000279 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000373 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000373 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000373 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000373 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000374 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000374 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000374 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000374 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000375 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000375 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000375 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000375 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000376 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000376 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000376 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000376 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000377 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000377 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000377 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000377 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000378 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000378 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000378 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000378 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000379 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000379 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000379 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000379 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000380 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000380 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000380 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000380 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000381 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000381 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000381 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000381 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000382 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000382 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000382 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000382 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000383 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000383 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000383 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000383 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000384 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000384 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000384 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000384 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000385 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000385 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000385 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000385 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000386 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000386 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000386 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000386 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000387 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000387 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000387 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000387 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000388 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000388 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000388 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000388 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000389 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000389 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000389 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000389 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000390 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000390 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000390 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000390 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000391 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000391 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000391 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000391 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000392 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000392 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000392 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000392 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000393 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000393 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000393 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000393 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000394 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000394 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000394 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000394 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000395 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000395 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000395 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000395 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000396 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000396 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000396 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000396 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000397 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000397 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000397 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000397 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000398 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000398 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000398 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000398 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000399 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000399 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000399 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000399 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000400 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000400 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000400 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000400 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000401 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000401 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000401 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000401 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000402 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000402 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000402 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000402 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000403 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000403 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000403 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000403 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000404 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000404 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000404 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000404 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000405 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000405 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000405 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000405 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000406 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000406 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000406 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000406 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000407 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000407 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000407 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000407 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000408 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000408 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000408 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000408 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000409 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000409 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000409 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000409 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000410 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000410 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000410 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000410 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000411 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000411 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000411 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000411 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000412 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000412 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000412 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000412 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000413 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000413 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000413 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000413 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000414 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000414 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000414 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000414 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000415 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000415 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000415 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000415 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000416 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000416 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000416 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000416 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000417 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000417 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000417 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000417 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000418 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000418 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000418 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000418 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000419 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000419 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000419 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000419 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000420 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000420 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000420 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000420 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000421 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000421 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000421 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000421 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000422 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000422 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000422 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000422 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000423 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000423 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000423 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000423 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000424 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000424 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000424 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000424 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000425 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000425 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000425 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000425 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000426 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000426 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000426 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000426 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000427 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000427 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000427 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000427 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000428 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000428 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000428 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000428 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000429 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000429 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000429 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000429 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000430 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000430 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000430 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000430 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000431 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000431 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000431 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000431 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000432 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000432 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000432 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000432 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000433 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000433 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000433 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000433 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000434 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000434 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000434 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000434 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000435 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000435 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000435 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000435 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000436 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000436 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000436 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000436 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000437 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000437 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000437 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000437 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000438 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000438 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000438 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000438 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000439 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000439 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000439 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000439 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000440 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000440 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000440 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000440 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000441 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000441 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000441 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000441 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000442 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000442 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000442 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000442 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000443 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000443 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000443 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000443 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000444 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000444 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000444 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000444 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000445 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000445 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000445 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000445 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000446 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000446 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000446 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000446 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000447 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000447 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000447 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000447 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000448 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000448 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000448 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000448 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000449 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000449 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000449 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000449 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000450 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000450 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000450 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000450 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000451 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000451 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000451 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000451 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000452 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000452 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000452 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000452 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000453 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000453 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000453 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000453 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000454 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000454 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000454 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000454 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000455 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000455 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000455 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000455 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000456 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000456 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000456 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000456 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000457 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000457 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000457 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000457 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000458 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000458 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000458 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000458 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000459 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000459 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000459 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000459 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000460 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000460 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000460 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000460 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000461 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000461 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000461 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000461 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000462 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000462 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000462 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000462 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000463 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000463 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000463 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000463 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000464 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000464 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000464 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000464 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000465 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000465 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000465 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000465 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000466 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000466 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000466 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000466 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000467 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000467 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000467 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000467 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000468 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000468 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000468 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000468 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000469 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000469 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000469 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000469 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000470 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000470 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000470 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000470 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000471 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000471 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000471 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000471 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000472 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000472 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000472 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000472 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000473 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000473 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000473 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000473 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000474 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000474 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000474 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000474 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000475 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000475 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000475 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000475 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000476 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000476 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000476 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000476 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000477 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000477 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000477 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000477 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000478 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000478 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000478 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000478 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000479 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000479 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000479 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000479 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000480 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000480 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000480 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000480 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000481 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000481 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000481 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000481 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000482 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000482 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000482 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000482 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000483 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000483 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000483 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000483 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000484 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000484 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000484 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000484 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000485 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000485 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000485 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000485 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000486 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000486 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000486 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000486 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000487 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000487 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000487 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000487 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000488 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000488 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000488 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000488 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000489 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000489 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000489 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000489 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000490 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000490 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000490 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000490 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000491 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000491 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000491 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000491 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000492 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000492 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000492 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000492 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000493 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000493 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000493 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000493 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000494 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000494 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000494 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000494 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000495 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000495 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000495 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000495 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000496 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000496 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000496 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000496 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000497 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000497 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000497 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000497 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000498 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000498 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000498 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000498 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000499 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000499 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000499 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000499 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000500 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000500 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000500 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000500 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000501 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000501 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000501 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000501 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000502 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000502 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000502 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000502 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000503 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000503 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000503 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000503 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000504 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000504 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000504 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000504 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000505 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000505 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000505 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000505 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000506 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000506 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000506 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000506 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000507 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000507 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000507 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000507 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000508 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000508 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000508 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000508 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000509 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000509 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000509 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000509 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000510 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000510 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000510 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000510 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000511 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000511 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000511 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000511 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000512 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000512 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000512 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000512 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000513 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000513 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000513 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000513 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000514 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000514 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000514 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000514 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000515 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000515 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000515 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000515 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000516 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000516 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000516 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000516 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000517 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000517 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
EMISFACT L0000517 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
EMISFACT L0000517 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0