LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
P a g e 20
6. Support measures to ensure reasonableness in the administration of NPDES permit governing City operations, including pursuing a municipal representative on the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
7. Support the safe, responsible, and cost-effective reuse of Exceptional Quality or better biosolids.
8. Support sustainable and resilient energy programs.
9. Support legislation allowing cities/agencies to establish fees for the costs of operating mandated water quality programs such as, but not limited to, municipal storm water and total maximum daily loading.
10. Support federal legislative action and funding to transfer Salinas Reservoir from Army Corps of Engineers Military Project to Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Project.
11. Support federal and state funding that would allow for transfer of Salinas Reservoir from the Army Corps of Engineers to the County or City of San Luis Obispo.
12. Support water conservation and water use efficiency best management practices.
13. Support amendments to the Urban Water Management Planning Act to recognize past investment in water conservation and the City's ability to comply with SBx7-7 (2009) and other water conservation regulations.
14. Oppose legislation that requires recycled water to be included in water conservation regulations.
15. Oppose mandatory consolidation of water systems.
16. Support the expansion of recycled water production and use, including potable reuse.
17. Support the use of PublicGoods Fundsfor the development and installation of energy saving or green energy generating projects to benefit local government.
18. Oppose legislation that diminishes the City’s existing or potential water rights.
19. Support the protection of water resources.
20. Support the protection of our natural resourcesfrom invasive species.
21. Support regional water resiliency initiatives.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
P a g e 21
22. Support streamlined water rights amendment processes for minor water rights permit changes.
23. Support federal and statewide funding of water infrastructure projects.
24. Oppose legislation that inhibits the City's ability to collect water and sewer bills either through terminating service for non-payment or other reasonable means absent public health or safety emergencies.
25. Oppose legislation that restricts water and sewer rates for certain customers to below the cost to provide service based on legitimate public interests such as affordable housing, senior housing, nonprofit public beneficial uses, and/or educational uses.
26. Support amendments to stormwater regulatory requirements to reduce mandatory minimum fines and penalties and the recovery of private attorneys’ fees for technical non-compliance issues that do not result in adverse public health impacts or environmental harm.
27. Support stormwater requirements that are related to specific issues and include reasonable implementation timeframes and funding.
28. Support autonomy for management of individual Sustainable Groundwater Management Act designated basins within the county.
29. Support funding for implementation of Groundwater Sustainability Plans including the San Luis Obispo/Edna Valley Basin.
30. Support federal and state policies that require per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) source control and labelling by product manufacturers, producers, packagers, importers, suppliers, or distributors.
31. Support federal and state funding to assist with identification and clean up of per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in public source water supplies.
32. Support federal or state legislation to protect and limit the liability of passive receivers such as public water and wastewater agencies facing the threat of either USEPA enforcement actions or third-party litigation from the decision to list PFAS as a hazardous substance.
33. Oppose state or local per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulations that are more restrictive than federal regulations.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
P a g e 22
County/Regional Priorities
1. Support County land use policies and practices that are consistent with the Memorandum of Agreement adopted by the City Council and County Board of Supervisors in 2016 regarding development near the edges of the City and opposing inconsistent policies and practices.
2. Encourage participation by County in providing nearby parking for County employees and clients, and alternate transportation and parking demand reduction.
3. Support County development of a local ordinance providing additional local oversight and regulation of the land application of Pollutant Concentration (PC) or better biosolids.
4. Support the San Luis Obispo County Zone 9 Flood Control and Water Conservation District efforts to solve City/County flood problems.
5. Support the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District's legislative program, where consistent with the City's adopted policies and platform.
6. Support the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments' legislative advocacy activities, where consistent with the City's adopted policies, platform, and public policy and project objectives.
7. Support efforts to enhance dangerous animal regulation and enforcement.
8. Support the streamlining, clarification, and simplification of conflict-of-interest regulations applicable to local officials.
9. Support efforts of other regional entities to join Central Coast Community Energy.
10. Support the Central Coast Regional Energy Network at the County Board of Supervisors, the CPUC, and related relevant entities and supporting pilot projects in the City as feasible.
11. Support regional and regulatory collaboration to fund and support climate change impact projections and coordinate approaches for increasing regional resilience.
12. Support requirements that development outside City jurisdiction have adequate water supplies to support development activities and intensities and does not indirectly impose water service obligations to adjacent municipal water agencies.
13. Support assistance for those experiencing physical and mental health impacts of a pandemic or other disaster.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
P a g e 23
14. Support the Integrated Waste Management Authority’s (IWMA) legislative platform, where consistent with the City’s adopted policies, platforms, and public policy and project objectives.
15. Support regional efforts to create a spectrum of housing types (including board and care and housing types that include other supportive services) within the County to house the unhoused.
16. Encourage the County of San Luis Obispo to build complete streets when building new roads, and to upgrade existing roadways to be complete streets.
EXHIBIT A
2024
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.XXXXX (2024 SERIES)
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
About this Legislative PlatformL
This Legislative Platform, adopted by the City of San Luis Obispo Council, will establish the City’s position on legislative matters of priority and importance to the City.
The Legislative Platformfollowing document reflects those legislative matters on which the council majority authorizes the Mayor, City Manager and City Attorney to engage in legislative advocacy on behalf of the City without the need for further council review or authority. The council’s authorization extends only to advocacy for or against generally applicable legislative proposals (including those pertaining to budget and, regulations, policies, and programs) being considered by local, regional, state and/or federal policy makers or regulators, as well as regional initiatives consistent with Major City Goals, andGoals and adopted City policy platforms, and. It does not otherwise extend to advocacy for or against on any individual project, program, or entitlement application pending before any decision‐making body, unless specifically noted herein.
The Legislative Platform shall be reviewed regularly and updated on an annual basis. The Legislative Platform shall be published and disseminated widely to promote transparency and awareness among the public.
For emerging issues or situations not outlined in the Legislative Platform, City staff will work with the City Council for further direction.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
Contents
Climate Action...............................................................................................................................................4 Energy ...........................................................................................................................................................5 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion..................................................................................................................... 6 Homelessness Resources ............................................................................................................................. 7 Community Development........................................................................................................................... 10 Economic Development.............................................................................................................................. 12 Finance & Governance................................................................................................................................12 Human Resources/Employee Relations...................................................................................................... 13 Public Safety................................................................................................................................................14 Public Works ...............................................................................................................................................16 Parks and Recreation and Natural Resources............................................................................................. 17 Transportation ............................................................................................................................................18 Utilities........................................................................................................................................................19 County/Regional Priorities........................................................................................................................ 22
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
Climate Action
1. Support funding for communities to pay for public infrastructure that meets state greenhouse gas emission reduction goals and adopted City objectives.
2. Support funding to implement programs and related action items contained in local and regional Climate Action Plans to quantitatively reduce greenhouse gas emissions and advocate for regulatory reform, including but not limited to clean technologies, micro‐grids, all electric/zero‐emission buildings, electrified transportation, behind the meter technology, and natural solutions (e.g., tree planting, open space conservation, and contemporary land management and restoration practices).
3. Support regulatory reform to facilitate for the transition to clean technologies, microgrids, low and zero carbon energy generation, and decarbonized buildings.
4. Support legislation and regulation that is aligned with the City’s goals of carbon neutrality by 2035 and sub‐goals related to municipal operations, clean electricity, building decarbonization, clean mobility, organic waste diversion, and natural solutions.
4.5.Oppose legislation and regulation that limits the City’s ability to achieve it’s goals of carbon neutrality by 2035 and sub‐goals related to municipal operations, clean electricity, building decarbonization, clean mobility, organic waste diversion, and natural solutions.
5.6. Support legislation and regulation that is aligned with the policies and programs set forth by the Climate Adaptation and Safety Element including using future projections for climate hazards in planning decisions, investing in community resilience, and adapting built infrastructure and natural ecosystems to climate change hazards and disturbances.
6.7. Support funding and resources to focus climate investments on programs and projects that support environmental justice, economic and racial equity, and head of household jobs.
7.8. Support legislation, policies, and regulation that extended producer responsibility for packaging and single‐use product manufacturing as to encourage source reduction and the manufacturing of reusable and sustainable products.
8.9. Support legislation, policies, and regulation thatmeasures that make waste diversion and reduction more equitable for our residents and businesses.
9.10. Support legislation that makes recycling organic waste and edible food recovery and distribution more efficient and easily accessible to residents and businesses in need.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
Energy
1. Support local communities’ broad authority to form and administer Community Choice Energy (CCE) programs, reforming the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), and limiting decisions that negatively impact CCEs or otherwise shift the financial impacts of investor‐owned utilities to CCEs.
2. Support California Community Choice Associations’ (Cal CCA) Regulatory and Legislative Platform, where consistent with the City’s legislative platform.
3. Support reform of CPUC policies and state tolegislation to ensure investor‐owned utilities are able and required to provide timely, accurate, and sufficiently detailed energy data.
4. Support reform of CPUC policies and state legislation that supports increased and equitable access to distributed energy resources, including rooftop solar.
5. Support reform of CPUC policies,state regulation, and state legislation thatsupport cost effective zero emission buildings, including support for lower electric rates specific for all‐electric buildings, increased value for net energy metering, and increased and equitable access to distributed energy resources, including rooftop solar and battery energy storage systems.
6. Support reform of CPUC policies, state regulation, and state legislation that support low income zero emission buildings, including support for mobile home parks, low‐income households, and other disadvantaged community members.
4.7. Support reform of CPUC policies and state legislation eliminating or reducing departing load charges which discourage the use of alternative energy resources.
5. Support legislation in alignment with Central Coast Community Energy Policy Board and Operations Board Positions.1
a. Support environmental justice and economic equity.
b. Support 3CE investment in and support for distributed energy resources (e.g., rooftop solar), virtual power plants, demand response, behind the meter technology and energy efficiency. 1 The City Council approved the City joining Central Coast Community Energy (3CE) in September 2018 and City representatives have been seated on 3CE’s Policy Board, Operations Board, and Community Advisory Council since 2019. This section of the City’s Legislative Platform identifies City of San Luis Obispo policy positions on key topics that may come before the various boards and advisory bodies of 3CE. The policy positions contained herein are intended to guide Board member deliberation, and voting and staff review of agenda, but are not an exhaustive list of issues that may arise. These positions are intended to extend only to advocacy for or against generally applicable policy proposals being considered by 3CE and does not extend to advocacy on any individual project or entitlement application pending before any decision‐making body, nor does it extend to the larger legislative platform of the City.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
c. Support 3CE in evaluating and deploying programs that are climate action force multipliers (e.g., tariffed on‐bill financing, virtual power plants, etc.). d. Support climate mitigation (e.g., emissions reductions), adaptation (e.g., distributed energy resources and grid stability), and resilience (e.g., disaster preparedness). e. Support the inclusion of all segments of the community in policy making and program design processes.
f. Support processes that are transparent, collaborative, visible, accessible, and inclusive. g. Support rate, rebate, and revenue structures that create a robust programs budget. h. Support a portfolio of programs that focuses on economic, social, and environmental equity. i. Support a portfolio of programs that focuses on strategic and intentional long‐term economic development consistent with sub‐regional economic development approaches. j. Support regional climate action and a portfolio of programs that are strategically implemented to achieve regional climate targets.
k. Support staffing required to effectively design, advertise, implement, and monitor effectiveness of the agency’s project portfolio.
l. Support local government access to data, transparent GHG emissions reporting, and sub‐ annual emissions factors as available.
m. Support programs that provide funding, technical support, or legislation that promotes grid independence and resiliency.
n. Support processes and governance approaches that provide sufficient time for Board members to fully participate and drive decisions, from inception to implementation. o. Support projects that focus on strategic and intentional regional economic development consistent with regional economic development approaches, when feasible, and with entities that support fair wage practices and maximize benefit to local workforces, when feasible.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
1. Support legislation that creates, expands, and/or provides broad authority to jurisdictions to develop and implement diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, policies, or initiatives to address systemic inequities that disproportionately impact programs and policies to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and address systemic inequities that disproportionately impact Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), LGBTQIA+, and other marginalized, underserved, and underrepresented racial, ethnic, and faith‐based communities.
2. Support legislation that disrupts anti‐immigrant ideologies and centers strategies reforms for advancing access for undocumented individuals’ health, well‐being, and success.
3. Support education and employment opportunities and advancementdevelopment of upward economic mobility and access to programs such as childcare, after‐school activities, school’s family support networks and supportive services for people aging out of the foster care system.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
4. Support increased availability of grant funding for ADA accessibility improvements and connectivity to streets, parks, and other public infrastructure.
5. Support amendments to the California Elections Code the California Voting Rights Act to expand safe harbor provisions in response to district elections demands under the California Voting Rights Act to include remedies, in addition to district elections, to enhance quantifiable equity gainsin participation and representation in local elections, including, but not limited to cumulative voting, limited voting, ranked choice voting and other voting structures that can be demonstrated to advance voter engagement and equity.
6. Support legislation that furthers jurisdictions to create policies that protect voting rights and work to disrupt voter suppression tactics that disproportionately impact Black, Indigenous, and other communities of color.
7. Support legislation that providesfunding sourcesfor appropriate human service agenciesthatsupport the mission of the Human Relations Commission.
8. Support legislation and funding to increase affordable and equitable childcare services and activities, and options for working low‐income families.
9. Support legislation related to implementation of the Racial Equity Framework2 and resources and tools to promote racial equity and address structural racism.
10. Support legislation that creates programs or policies that identify and enhance opportunities for expanded programs that contribute to family friendly workplace environments that may include, but are not limited to leave for reproductive loss, paid parental leave, flextime, and job sharing.
9.11. Support legislation that advances access and expands funding for services, programs, and/or projects centered in addressing inequities experienced by that disproportionately impact Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), LGBTQIA+, and other marginalized, underserved, and underrepresented communities. underserved and underrepresented communities.
Homelessness Resources Advocacy
1. Support legislation and funding for the prevention of homelessness and support of families and individuals vulnerable to becoming homeless.
2 Executive Order N‐16‐22 establishes the State's authority to develop plans and strategies to advance equity and identify disparities. Within the Executive Order, there are specifics for the Governor's Office of Planning & Research to create the Racial Equity Commission (REC). One of the duties of the REC is to produce a Racial Equity Framework by 2024, which will contain strategies for state, county, and local governments to implement.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
2. Support funding for project‐based, permanent affordable housing.
3. Support funding for the entire housing spectrum (including affordable units, ADUs, Tiny Homes, Temporary Emergency Shelters and family housing, and supportive housing for all homeless unhoused individuals and families including the mentally ill, medically fragile, and aging adults).
4. Advocate for increased flexibility in the use of Federal Funds at the local level to address the full spectrum of services and transitional housing for individuals who are unhoused.
5. Support nonprofit eviction prevention services for low‐income individuals and families.
6. Support programs and funding to encourage private market landlords to provide affordable units, participate in housing voucher programs, and upgrade units for energy efficiency.
7. Support additional funding that encourages unique multi‐departmental and inter‐governmental collaboration to assist individuals experiencing homelessness, such as the City’s Community Action Team (CAT) and Mobile Crisis Unit (MCU), as well as Crisis Intervention Training (CIT) for public safety personnel.
7.8. Support employment services and job training opportunities for individuals who are homeless or at‐ risk of becoming homeless.
9. Support funding for federal, state, county and local coordination with, non‐profit and faith‐based organizations to community’s coordination in preventing and ending address homelessness.
8.10. Support funding for the removal and storage of homeless unhoused individual’s belongings and the cleaning of sites used by unhoused residents, in alignment with the City’s Compassionate Assistance, Mitigation & Prevention (CAMP) Standards and Temporary Storage Guidelines.
9.11. Support funding and county programs that promote whole person care approaches that include access to expanded medical, mental, and behavioral health services, including substance use disorder treatment services, and new approaches to financing health care access and patient wellness to reduce avoidable emergency room visits, hospital stays and readmissions.
10.12. Support increased funding and statutory authorization for crisis intervention, involuntary assessment and commitment, guardianship control, and health welfare intervention and supervision of those suffering from chronic homelessness, mental illness and addiction, and recognition of mental illness and addiction as contributors to chronic homelessness.
11.13. Support streamlined protocols and metrics to be used by homeless service providers, local agencies, and other non‐governmental partners to capture and share accurate statistics of individuals
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
experiencing homelessness, including vacancy and capacity rates, in‐flow and out‐flow information, cost‐reporting of services provided and rendered, and individuals successfully housed.
12.14. Oppose legislation thatseeksto circumvent local control and consideration of local circumstances and safety of the general public when addressing homelessness.
13.15. Support legislation , programs, funding, court intervention, and statutory authorization for a unified crisis response system and to enhances the ability of the County Behavioral Health Director, crisisresponse personnel, family members and socialservice providersto share information necessary for effective treatment interventions and to compel assisted outpatient treatment for a person exiting a conservatorship and those lacking capacity to provide for their own healthcare, shelter and food needs.
14.16. Support legislation that would allow the courts and crisis intervention personnel to consider a person’s medical, addiction and mental health conditions, history of adverse impacts on community health and safety, and capacity of individuals to provide for their own health, shelter, and food needs in mandating program participation in connection with criminal justice and other contacts, including or expansion of the definition of “gravely disabled” under code section 5150 et seq. in evaluating whether an individual is a danger to themselves or others.
15.17. Support legislation for Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) to allow for flexibility in funds earmarked for “Innovation” programs that are aimed at finding new and different ways to provide services.
16.18. Support legislation, funding, programs, and policies to help expand capacity in local psychiatric health facilities, delivery of case management, drug, alcohol, and detoxification services and facilities, assisted living beds for medically fragile people, and mental health services for all County residents.
17.19. Advocate that the County lead in the area of expanding humane shelter and housing opportunities for the unhoused population and expand outreach and case managementservicesspecifically tailored to the needs of homeless unhoused individuals in the County to transition out of homelessness.
18.20. Support the use of data from public safety, City, and regional Community Action Teams (CAT) and Mobile Crisis Units (MCU) outcomes, to advocate that the County allocate new resources to scale up these programs to match the need.
19.21. Support an effective and efficient implementation of San Luis Obispo County’s 5‐ Year Plan to Address Homelessness.
20.22. Support state and federal funding of mandates to provide care and services to vulnerable populations.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
23. Support legislative efforts to repeal Article 34 of the California Constitution, which requires majority approval by the voters of a city or county for the development, construction, or acquisition of a publicly funded affordable housing project.
24. Support legislation, policies, and programs that expand tenant affordability and stability.
Community Development
1. Support local control of land use planning and zoning matters.
2. Support State and Federal assistance to prevent the loss of housing for those impacted by local, state, or federal disasters.
3. Support reforms of the State mandated HCD Regional Housing Need Allocations process to recognize local resource limitations and align infrastructure and other funding to help communities meet mandated housing requirements.
4. Support funding of on‐campus housing at Cal Poly for students, staff and faculty, and University acquisition of residences for staff and faculty housing.
5. Support increased funding for affordable housing and supportive housing services for very low, low, and moderate income individuals and families in all cities and communities and opposing the erosion of local inclusionary housing and in‐lieu fee programs.
6. Support continued funding of National Housing Trust Fund and streamlined and efficient implementation regulations at the state level.
7. Support additional state funding to implement AB 32 (The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) and SB 375 (The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008) through local general plan updates that implement the regional sustainable communities plan and alternative planning strategy, if needed.
8. Advocate for funding for the identification, acquisition, maintenance and restoration of historic sites and structures.
9. Support continued and expanded funding for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program.
10. Support policies, programs and funding to support opportunitiesto convert vacant commercialspaces
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
to affordable housing and child care facilities.
9.11. Support state and federal level down‐payment assistance programs and the expansion of below‐ market rate assistance programs.
10.12. Support continued local control over mobile home park rent stabilization and local control over the conversion of mobile home parks to other uses to ensure that low‐income mobile home park residents are not involuntarily removed from homes or otherwise subject to involuntary displacement due to economic impacts of parks subdivision or conversion.
11.13. Encourage the protection, enhancement, and increased production of mobile home park residency opportunities.
12. Promote resolving regulatory or financial barriers to implement AB 811 (2008) property‐assessed clean energy districts.
13. Encourage continued viability and expansion of inclusionary housing provisions and avoidance of conflicts with Costa‐Hawkins Act.
14. Advocate for the ability to issue parking citations on private property.
15. Support responsible review and revision of CEQA to ensure sound environmental determinations.
16. Promote pragmatic and clarifying actionsto implement Proposition 64 Cannabislegalization, including increased funding for health education, the preservation of local land use decision making, reconciliation of conflicts in state and federal law, and systems for legal banking.
17. Support increased relocation assistance (AB 1482 2019) when a tenant is evicted due to no‐fault of their own.
18. Support astate and federal comprehensive approaches to renter protections for rental housing and enforcement of existing renter protections in accordance with the California Civil Codes including but not limited to Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1940‐1954.1 .
19. Support funding for seismic retrofitting for buildings that haven't been retrofitted.
20. Support and participate in the study period for AB 835 regarding building standards for single exit, single stairway apartment houses.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
Economic Development
1. Support state and federal assistance for those people and businesses facing severe economic losses due to pandemic or other disasters.
2. Support regional economic activities except for those that promote weapons or fossil fuel production or distribution activities.
3. Support direct assistance and/or legislation that supports local agencies with recovering costs related to the pandemic or other disasters and stimulate economic development, resiliency, and recovery.
4. Support funding and legislation using tax credits or other incentive programs to encourage research and development by businesses in California.
5. Support funding and policies for the promotion of California and the City and County of San Luis Obispo as a place to locate businesses that provide head‐of‐household jobs.
6. Support economic development that is integrated with articulated Major City Goals such as climate action, environmental protection and social justice and diversity objectives.
7. Support funding for the state tourism promotion program.
8. Support the effective and efficient use of all communications technologies including voice, video, data, and information services over wired and wireless transmission technologies and supporting net neutrality.
9. Support telecommunications reform legislation and other measures that preserve local control over public rights‐of‐way, protect local resources, broadband and telecommunicationsfor all residents and guarantee access to, funding for, and local flexibility in utilizing funds for public, educational and government (PEG) access television.
10. Support the expansion of public infrastructure financing tools and funding for infrastructure.
Finance & Governance
1. Support meaningful fiscal reform that allows each level of government to adequately finance its service responsibilities while continuing to support efforts to protect the City from loss of revenues due to State take‐aways and unfunded State or Federal mandates.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
2. Oppose initiatives that unduly burden and/or prohibit local government ability to support essential services to the community.
3. Support collection of the full amount of local transient occupancy tax from online sales of lodging.
4. Support the continuation of California Specialized Training Institute activities within San Luis Obispo County.
5. Oppose removal of the municipal bond tax exemption.
6. Support legislation to modernize the Ralph M. Brown Act to provide increased flexibility for remote participation in public meetings by elected and appointed officials and provide increased opportunities for public engagement.
7. Support legislation that furthers SB 1439’s intent to restrict “Pay‐to‐play” campaign financing but provides clarifications and modifications that reduce the administrative burden associated with the implementation as currently written.
Human Resources/Employee Relations
1. Support additional workers’ compensation reforms that lower employers' costs while still protecting workers and oppose legislation that would restrict appropriate cost controls in the workers’ compensation system.
2. Support pension and retiree health benefits reform efforts, policy changes, and permissible administration decisions aimed at reducing unfunded liabilities, reducing costs, and ensuring the long‐ term viability of the defined benefit pension system in concert with the League of California Cities and the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) Board of Directors.
3. Oppose the expansion of property rights in public employment and procedural requirements that hinder or significantly increase the public costs of effective performance management, including legislation that curtails management rights or obstructs the timely, efficient, and cost‐effective implementation of performance management or disciplinary measures.
4. Support legislation to protect the City's continued ability to administer its Cafeteria Benefit Plan and maintain comprehensive health care coverage for eligible employees, in a financially sustainable manner.
5. Support reforms that limit the financial impacts of joint and several liability on public entities.
6. Support the clarification, modification or repeal of AB 646 fact finding requirements and oppose
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
measures that reduces local control over public employee disputes.
7. Oppose measures that curtail management rights or impose local government mandated employee benefits that should be directly negotiated between labor groups and employers.
8. Support Federal legislation to modify, refine, or eliminate Federal Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requirements on public agencies.
9. Support reforms that limit the joint and several liability to agencies who have entered into Joint Powers Agreements (JPAs).
10. Support meaningful statewide and national efforts to make quality health care more affordable and accessible to residents and reduce costs for cities and employers.
Public Safety
1. Support new and continued State and Federal funding for school safety, disaster preparedness, earthquake preparedness, Homeland Security, hazardous material response, State COPS (Citizen’s Options for Public Safety) program, CIT (Crisis Intervention Training) and other public safety activities.
2. Support preservation of the City's authority to investigate police misconduct.
3. Support local control on issuance of concealed weapons permits.
4. Support legislation to help curb drug and alcohol‐related criminal behavior and underage consumption.
5. Support legislation to limit or end the sale of all nonflavored and flavored electronic smoking device products, including mint and menthol and to increase enforcement and education related to their use.
6. Oppose new or increased state fees for state‐provided law enforcement services.
7. Support the fair and efficient allocation of radio spectrum that provides quality frequencies, free from interference, for all local public safety communication needs.
8. Support effortsto enhance radio and data system(s)stability and interoperability among public safety agencies and jurisdictions.
9. Preserve the City's right to regulate activities with adverse health and safety impacts on local streets, sidewalks, public spaces, and rights‐of‐way.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
10. Support legislation to improve and enhance the safety of cargo transported via rail, including but not limited to: safety enhancements for rail vessel construction with an emphasis on efforts to rapidly improve the safe transport of volatile crude oil and limit the use of older, “grandfathered” containers and vessels; enhancements in remote monitoring and control of railcar speeds; reduction of railcar speeds in populated areas like San Luis Obispo; enhancements in communications, notifications and information dissemination to local governments, especially public safety agencies.
11. Support and expand funding and programs to local jurisdictions to proactively reduce fire risk attributed to heavy vegetative fuelsloads, high tree mortality, drought, and climate change to remove diseased, dead and/or down combustible vegetation, thin foreststo improve forest health, and create effective defensible space between the undeveloped and developed environments.
12. Support grants and aid to land/property owners with properties one mile or less from natural vegetation, which are threatened by wind‐driven fire events, to harden structures again fire impingement and create sustainable defensible spaces.
13. Support grants and aid to local governments to develop modern evacuation communications systems to effectively reach all residents in a timely fashion via voice, text, email, and other electronic means.
14. Support legislation to preserve and enhance local control, at the city level, for the provision of public safety services, including the scope and provision of medical and non‐medical emergency services and legislation that would result in the implementation of a statewide modern earthquake notification and evacuation communications system to effectively reach all residents in a timely fashion via voice, text, email, and other electronic means, which is available for use by local governments at the discretion of local governments.
15. Support uniformity of state and federal regulations of drones and the study and adoption of appropriate local airport protections and public safety exemptions.
16. Support legislation regarding the safe transport and storage of nuclear waste.
17. Support legislation to address the education, funding, and treatment of opioid addiction.
18. Support legislation that expandsfunding to manage vegetation and fuelsourcesin the wildland urban interface.
19. Support legislation to provide funding to help communities prepare for response, recovery and be resilient after natural disasters.
20. Support funding to remove unwanted firearms from homes and businesses.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
21. Support responsive intervention programs that promote accountability and divert people away from both crime and prison.
22. Support funding and training for emergency response to electrified vehicles and infrastructure.
21.23. Support legislation and policies that protect and support individuals who are targeted by hate crimes and hate biased incidents.
Public Works
1. Support increased availability of grant funding to replace aging infrastructure of all types, e.g.,streets, bridges, water, sewer, parks, and storm sewer systems, etc.
2. Support increased funding for flood protection, clean stormwater, and low impact infrastructure projects.
3. Support cooperation and prompt approval from Federal and State regulatory agencies (such as the Department of Fish & Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the Army Corps of Engineers) for necessary projects involving the City's creek system.
4. Support monetary incentives or grant funding for electric vehicles for replacement of municipal fleet equipment.
5. Support funding and policies that support and enhance active transportation modes such as bicycles, pedestrian, and transit.
6. Support continued protection of SB‐1 and other funding for transportation infrastructure maintenance.
7. Support policies and legislation that maintains local control of parking rules, regulations, rates, and citation fees.
7.8. Support policies and legislation that allow for increased enforcement ability for off‐street parking, including but not limited to use of automated parking control devices on public agency owned or operated off‐street parking facilities for the purpose of issuing parking violations.
8.9. Support permanently allowing local governments to use design‐build processes and expand the types of projects that cities can use design build and progressive design‐build.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
Parks and Recreation and Natural Resources
1. Support State and Federal funding and other measures to promote the acquisition, protection, preservation and restoration of natural resources, open space, coastal resources, signature landforms, wetlands, and park development, including continued funding for the Land and Water Conservation Grant Program and for the California Conservation Corps.
2. Support the expansion of National Marine Sanctuary off the coast of San Luis Obispo County to protect this fragile habitat from offshore oil and gas development.
3. Oppose any development under existing or new offshore oil and gas leases off the Coast of San Luis Obispo County.
4. Oppose any development under existing or new oil and gas leases in San Luis Obispo County.
5. Support and seek State and Federal funding and other measures to conduct research and implement land management measures for the purpose of carbon sequestration.
6. Support measures to prohibit discharge of pollutants into the creeks and ocean (e.g., selenium contaminated waters from the San Joaquin valley).
7. Support State and Federal funding and other measures to take advantage of opportunities for land and easement acquisition and enhancement project contracting.
8. Support legislative exemption from property taxes on lands dedicated to open space purposes, which may be outside the boundaries of the jurisdiction owning such lands.
9. Support funding to reduce or mitigate negative impacts to vital regional and community services and enhance public access to parks, open space, after school programming, senior services, facilities that promote physical activity, protect natural resources, and strengthen safety and security.
10. Promote policies that recognize the benefits of parks and recreational facilities in the advancement of "sustainable communities" and curbing greenhouse gas emissions including: strengthening policies that fund parks, open‐space, bike lanes and non‐motorized trails through the development and implementation of a carbon credit and offset program, and advocating for the strong integration of local and regional park and non‐motorized transportation improvements into "Smart Growth Scenarios" pursuant to SB 375 (2008).
11. Support access and connectivity to joint use ofschools; parks and open space; development of streets and trails that encourage physical activity and healthy living.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
12. Support extension or permanent legislation at the federal level of enhanced tax deductions for charitable donations of Conservation Easements.
13. Support legislation to limit the opening of protected public lands, e.g., Carrizo Plain, to fossil fuel extraction.
Transportation
1. Support changes in gas tax laws that allow local tax for transportation purposes based on a majority vote of the public, as well as revenue replacement for electric vehicles to support transportation infrastructure.
2. Support the continuation of, and increased funding sources for street maintenance projects, transportation improvements, transit operations and multimodal facility projects.
3. Support funding sources for fleet and transit electrification.
4. Support transportation funding for San Luis Obispo County, in particular funding that provides for alternative modes of transportation with clean air benefits or reductions in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gases.
5. Support transportation funding and policy that promote regional bike and pedestrian connections between cities and other population centers.
6. Support actions to: (1) promote cooperation and mutual support between metropolitan planning organization (MPO) agencies and local transit providers, and (2) discourage trends toward MPO agencies/regional "control" of local transit providers.
7. Support cooperation of private transportation companies (such as Union Pacific Railroad) to reach agreements for sharing of properly secured right of way corridors for other compatible uses such as bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
8. Oppose the proposed diversion of any funding source for transportation that reduces amounts designated for transit operations.
9. Support funding for projects to implement adopted complete street plans demonstrated to improve public health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
10. Support provision of Cap‐and‐Trade funding for transportation projects.
11. Support increased funding for existing Active Transportation Program (ATP) and other sources of
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
bicycle and pedestrian transportation funding.
12. Support funding for existing and future transportation needs.
13. Support funding strategiesto reduce the personal cost of transportation, especially cargo and electric‐ assist bicycles and their supporting infrastructure.
14. Oppose proposed changes to statistical methodologies such as Metropolitan Statistical Areas that have the potential to reduce funding for transportation improvements.
15. Support improvements of state and federal standards guiding application of street design and traffic control devices to allow more flexibility for local agencies to prioritize safety, particularly for vulnerable road users, and including locationsthat interface with the state highway system, consistent with calls to action from groups like the National Transportation Safety Board, NACTO and others.
16. Support opportunities for improved coordination between state and local governments to advance common goals and priorities, such as opportunities for partnership projects between the City and Caltrans to advance safety and multimodal improvements to state highway facilities within and in the vicinity of the City.
15.17. In alignment with the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), support legislation for a Bike Safety Stop that would authorize a person bicycling to treat a stop sign like a yield sign, giving right‐of‐way to other traffic at an intersection before proceeding safely through, but without the requirement to come to a full stop.
18. Support consideration of increased funding and options for safe bike and pedestrian crossing of railroad tracks, including bridges, underpasses and controlled at‐grade crossings.
19. Support legislation to improve safety featuresfor new motor vehicles, including requirementsforside guards on certain trucks and trailers and/or addition of devices that would limit the ability of drivers to unreasonably exceed posted speed limits.
20. Oppose legislation that would modify current restrictions to allow longer or heavier tractor‐trailers to use public roadways, which would increase roadway wear and tear and degrade safety for other road users.
Utilities
1. Support clean water and drinking water funding programs.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
2. Support recycling, waste diversion, and zero waste programs and enhancing local government's ability to comply with solid waste reduction requirements (includes building of recycling infrastructure and organics / biosolids composting facilities).
3. Support measures that require the State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards establish a process to evaluate, in advance of adoption, the costs of compliance for pending and future regulatory actions on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permittees.
4. Support legislation that requires the State's environmental agencies to conduct peer review of proposed regulations to ensure that the proposal is based on sound science.
5. Support the elimination of mandatory minimum penalties for violations of NPDES Requirements and returning discretionary control to the Regional Water Quality Control Board Executive Officers (i.e., California Water Code Section 13385[h]).
6. Support measures to ensure reasonableness in the administration of NPDES permit governing City operations, including pursuing a municipal representative on the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
7. Support the safe, responsible, and cost‐effective reuse of Exceptional Quality or better biosolids.
8. Support sustainable and resilient energy programs.
9. Support legislation allowing cities/agencies to establish fees for the costs of operating mandated water quality programs such as, but not limited to, municipal storm water and total maximum daily loading.
10. Support federal legislative action and funding to transfer Salinas Reservoir from Army Corps of Engineers Military Project to Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Project.
11. Support federal and state funding that would allow for transfer of Salinas Reservoir from the Army Corps of Engineers to the County or City of San Luis Obispo.
12. Support water conservation and water use efficiency best management practices.
13. Support amendments to the Urban Water Management Planning Act to recognize past investment in water conservation and the City's ability to comply with SBx7‐7 (2009) and other water conservation regulations.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
14. Oppose legislation that requires recycled water to be included in water conservation regulations.
15. Oppose mandatory consolidation of water systems.
16. Support the expansion of recycled water production and use, including potable reuse.
17. Support the use of PublicGoods Fundsfor the development and installation of energy saving or green energy generating projects to benefit local government.
18. Oppose legislation that diminishes the City’s existing or potential water rights.
19. Support the protection of water resources.
20. Support the protection of our natural resourcesfrom invasive species.
21. Support regional water resiliency initiatives.
22. Support streamlined water rights amendment processes for minor water rights permit changes.
23. Support federal and statewide funding of water infrastructure projects.
24. Oppose legislation that inhibits the City's ability to collect water and sewer bills either through terminating service for non‐payment or other reasonable means absent public health or safety emergencies.
25. Oppose legislation that restricts water and sewer rates for certain customers to below the cost to provide service based on legitimate public interests such as affordable housing, senior housing, nonprofit public beneficial uses, and/or educational uses.
26. Support amendments to stormwater regulatory requirements to reduce mandatory minimum fines and penalties and the recovery of private attorneys’ fees for technical non‐compliance issues that do not result in adverse public health impacts or environmental harm.
27. Support stormwater requirements that are related to specific issues and include reasonable implementation timeframes and funding.
28. Support autonomy for management of individual Sustainable Groundwater Management Act designated basins within the county.
29. Support funding for implementation of Groundwater Sustainability Plans including the San Luis Obispo/Edna Valley Basin.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
30. Support federal and state policies that require per‐ or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) source control and labelling by product manufacturers, producers, packagers, importers, suppliers, or distributors.
31. Support federal and state funding to assist with identification and clean up of per‐ or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in public source water supplies.
32. Support federal or state legislation to protect and limit the liability of passive receivers such as public water and wastewater agencies facing the threat of either USEPA enforcement actions or third‐party litigation from the decision to list PFAS as a hazardous substance.
29.33. Oppose state or local per‐ or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulations that are more restrictive than federal regulations.
County/Regional Priorities
1. Support County land use policies and practices that are consistent with the Memorandum of Agreement adopted by the City Council and County Board of Supervisors in 2016 regarding development near the edges of the City and opposing inconsistent policies and practices.
2. Encourage participation by County in providing nearby parking for County employees and clients, and alternate transportation and parking demand reduction.
3. Support County development of a local ordinance providing additional local oversight and regulation of the land application of Pollutant Concentration (PC) or better biosolids.
4. Support the San Luis Obispo County Zone 9 Flood Control and Water Conservation District efforts to solve City/County flood problems.
5. Support the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District's legislative program, where consistent with the City's adopted policies and platform.
6. Support the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments' legislative advocacy activities, where consistent with the City's adopted policies, platform, and public policy and project objectives.
7. Support efforts to enhance dangerous animal regulation and enforcement.
8. Support the streamlining, clarification, and simplification of conflict‐of‐interest regulations applicable to local officials.
9. Support efforts of other regional entities to join Central Coast Community Energy.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM
10. Support the Central Coast Regional Energy Network at the County Board of Supervisors, the CPUC, and related relevant entities and supporting pilot projects in the City as feasible.
11. Support regional and regulatory collaboration to fund and support climate change impact projections and coordinate approaches for increasing regional resilience.
12. Support requirements that development outside City jurisdiction have adequate water supplies to support development activities and intensities and does not indirectly impose water service obligations to adjacent municipal water agencies.
13. Support assistance for those experiencing physical and mental health impacts of a pandemic or other disaster.
14. Support the Integrated Waste Management Authority’s(IWMA) legislative platform, where consistent with the City’s adopted policies, platforms, and public policy and project objectives.
15. Support regional efforts to create a spectrum of housing types (including board and care and housing types that include other supportive services) within the County to house the unhoused.
16. Encourage the County of San Luis Obispo to build complete streets when building new roads, and to upgrade existing roadways to be complete streets.
Item 6g
Department: Utilities
Cost Center: 6107
For Agenda of: 4/2/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Aaron Floyd, Utilities Director
Prepared By: Chris Lehman, Deputy Director – Wastewater Meg Buckingham, Solid Waste and Recycling Program Manager SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY INTEGRATED
WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
GRANT APPLICATION
RECOMMENDATION
1. Authorize the Utilities Department to apply for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Integrated Waste Management Authority Technical Assistance Grant in the amount of $10,000;
2. If the grant is awarded, authorize the Utilities Director, or their designee, to execute necessary grant documents and direct the appropriation of monies to the accounts required to administer the grant.
POLICY CONTEXT
The recommended actions are consistent with the City of San Luis Obispo’s Climate Action Plan, Pillar 5: Circular Economy, which includes a Lead by Example component identifying a zero-waste goal of ninety percent landfill diversion for all City operations, buildings, and facilities by 2030.
DISCUSSION
Background
The San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) offers a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Program to businesses, government agencies, nonprofit groups, and institutions located in San Luis Obispo County to promote, start, and/or expand waste reduction and landfill diversion efforts.
The IWMA’s TAG Program is designed to empower local groups and/or change agents to develop community-based strategies for the prevention, separation, diversion, recycling, and composting of material. The IWMA typically seeks applicants who can act as a catalyst for reducing waste, promote zero waste strategies, demonstrate circular economy practices to eliminate waste, and maximize material resources.
Item 6g
Application Process and Proposed Use of Grant Funds
If approved by the City Council, staff will apply to the TAG Program. This is a competitive grant opportunity and applications include a written component (Attachment A) and a presentation to the IWMA Board of Directors for consideration at the May 8, 2024, Board of Directors meeting.
In 2023, staff performed an audit of the trash, recycling, and organics containers located at indoor and rentable City facilities to identify areas that need new containers in compliance with Senate Bill 1383. During this audit, staff observed certain City facilities had broken containers, incorrectly labeled containers, or no containers at all for recycling.
Staff procured uniform two and three waste stream containers with available budgetary savings and installed them at prioritized City facilities not in compliance with SB1383, or that had an immediate need. This grant funding would be used to purchase containers for the remaining public-facing or high-use locations that do not yet have the needed containers. The in-kind contributions of staff time will be dedicated to facilitating the project, procuring and installing the containers, and reporting the success to the IWMA.
This grant would further the City’s efforts towards meeting the ambitious zero waste goal included in the adopted Climate Action Plan with the intent that by leading by example, the City will simultaneously reduce greenhouse gas emissions and demonstrate replicable strategies to residents, businesses, and other organizations.
Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
On October 20, 2020, the City Council authorized staff to apply for a previous round of TAG Program funding. Grant funding renews every fiscal year, providing the opportunity for agencies to apply annually.
Public Engagement
Public comment can be provided to the City Council through written correspondence prior to the meeting and through public testimony at the meeting. An opportunity for public comment will also be available at the May 8, 2024, IWMA Board of Directors meeting when the City’s TAG funding request is under consideration.
CONCURRENCE
The City’s Finance Department concurs with the findings of this report. The Office of Sustainability and Natural Resources also concurs with staff’s recommendation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The recommended actions are not a “project” as defined under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because the action will not result in any physical change to the environment.
Item 6g
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2023-24
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $ $ $ $
State
Federal
Fees
Other: TAG
Program Award
$10,000
Total $10,000 $ $ $
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action to authorize staff to pursue a grant funding opportunity with the IWMA for up to $10,000 to fund solid waste and recycling infrastructural improvements to increase landfill diversion.
ALTERNATIVES
Council could decide not to authorize the application to the IWMA TAG Program.
Staff does not recommend this alternative; however, if Council chooses not to authorize staff to apply for this funding, staff will continue to seek other funding sources to assist with the implementation of the City’s Climate Action Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Technical Assistance Grant Program Application
Applicant Name First:M eg
Last: B ki h uc ng am
3. Provide an itemized projected budget (revenues and costs) for the next (3) three years.
Included the project's proposed in-kind contribution. In-kind contributions can be any services or equipment being provided by the applicant such as time, matching funding, etc.
Year 1:
Grant Funds - $10,000 (bin procurement - bin costs and shipping) In-Kind - 5 hours of staff time (Bin procurement, facilitation, and installation) In-Kind - 12 hours of staff time (Quarterly bin monitoring for contamination and diversion success) Year 2:
In-Kind - 12 hours of staff time (Quarterly bin monitoring for contamination and diversion success) Year 3:
In-Kind - 12 hours of staff time ( Quarterly bin monitoring for contamination and diversion success) No revenues will be received from this effort.
4. Describe how your program will reduce waste, divert waste, and/or conserve landfill space.
Also, describe how you will track/measure project milestones in order to meet intended goals.
In July 2023, the City hired a consultant, ReCREATE, to conduct a waste generation and characterization audit ofCity facilities and operations. ReCREATE determined that the City's internal diversion rate was 30 percent, however, it could be doubled to 60 percent if discarded materials were properly source separated.
Placing uniformly paired, well-labeled, and SB 1383 consistent color-coded bins in areas where recycling is not currently offered and in high employee/public usage areas is expected to increase the amount of materials the City is able to divert from landfill disposal. In addition, the new bins allow for customized signage that can be designed and periodically updated to target location specific contamination based on the findings of quarterly visual audits.
The City will use an Excel spreadsheet to track the status of project milestones. Milestones include opening a purchase order to the bin system supplier, product delivery, and grant administrative tasks.
Additional milestones beyond the scope of this funding request include product installation, quarterly visual waste contamination audits, and the design and installation of customizable signs.
Osan Luis Obispo County IWMA 870 Osos St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-782-8530 Page 183 of 658 Page-3- Applicant Name Firs
t
:M eg
L
as
t
:B ki h uc ng am
5. How does this project provide new or expanded landfill diversion and/or source reduction opportunities for San Luis Obispo County?
Placing uniformly paired, well-labeled, and SB 1383 consistent color-coded bins in areas where recycling is not currently offered and in high employee usage areas with inferior bin set ups is expected to increase the amount of materials the City is able to divert from landfill disposal.
A prime example is the Sinsheimer Pool that does not have public facing bins for mixed recycling and organics recycling in its lobby area. This facility has over 40 part-time lifeguards and can draw hundreds of members of the public for a single event who enter and exit through this area.
The new bins allow for customized signage that can be easily updated to target location specific contamination based on the results of periodic audits. The City has piloted both types of bin systems in many of its rental facilities, such as the Ludwick Center and Library Community room, and has received very positive feedback from facility users.
6. What resources and expertise do you have to complete this project? The City implemented the first phase of this project in 2023 and has a clear understanding of what it will take to procure and install the bin systems at the identified locations.
The City has already conducted multiple surveys of its facilities to determine these high priority locations, that included stakeholder input from facility users.
Time will be dedicated from the Solid Waste and Recycling Coordinator and Solid Waste and Recycling Manager to oversee the procurement of the bins, and City Building Maintenance staff will assist with their installation. The program also includes custodial training to make sure materials placed in each of the containers are properly discarded in the appropriate outdoor receptacles.
Note: In addition to responding to the above (6) six items, applicants may provide up to (10) ten pages of supplemental information such as brochures, equipment flyers, etc. Print application and submit the complete packet by US Postal Service. Applications must be date stamped by the application deadline.
Osan Luis Obispo County IWMA 870 Osos St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-782-8530 Page 184 of 658 Page -4- Item 6h
Department: Administration
Cost Center: 1005
For Agenda of: 4/2/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Greg Hermann, Deputy City Manager
Prepared By: Robert Hill, Sustainability & Natural Resources Official SUBJECT: PURCHASE OFFER FOR PERMANENT EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FROM COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FOR BOB JONES PATHWAY PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to an offer package received from the County of San Luis Obispo for its Bob Jones Pathway Project:
1. Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, authorizing the sale of a Perpetual Easement and a Temporary Construction Easement for the County of San Luis Obispo’s Bob Jones Pathway Project that will encumber portions of property owned by the City of San Luis Obispo identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 076-061-075, 076-061-078, and 076-121-018 commonly known as the Filipponi Ecological Reserve”; and
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the document entitled, “Perpetual Easement Agreement (And Temporary Construction Easement) Bob Jones Pathway”; and
3. Direct staff to receive and reserve the funds for future open space uses in accordance with General Plan policy.
POLICY CONTEXT
There are three areas of pertinent City policy applicable to evaluating the offer from the County of San Luis for the requested easements necessary for them to complete their Bob Jones Pathway Project.
1. Support for the County’s Bob Jones Pathway Project can be found in a suite of City policy documents:
a) The Land Use Element of the General Plan (2014), with Goal # 10 (Environment), “Support statewide and regional efforts to create more sustainable communities, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and develop transportation systems that support all modes of circulation.”
Item 6h
b) The Circulation Element of the General Plan (2014) calls for achieving a transportation mode split objective of 20% of all trips being made by bicycle, which is echoed by the Climate Action Plan for Community Recovery (2020) that also places a strong emphasis on addressing emissions from regional trips.
c) The Active Transportation Plan (2021) addresses the need for regional collaboration and specifically names the subject project with Goal 1.9 Collaborate with Regional Partners. “Cooperate with the County, State, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, Cuesta College and Cal Poly in the planning and design of regional bicycle and pedestrian facilities (e.g. Bob Jones City-to-Sea Bike Trail, Chorro Valley Trail, Edna-Price Canyon Trail) to expand regional active transportation and recreation opportunities.”
2. The City of San Luis Obispo’s policies and procedures for real property acquisition and disposal are found at Section 475 of the Financial Management Manual, which further incorporates City Charter Article IX, Section 906 and City Council Resolution No. 10052 (2009 Series). Policy guidance pertinent to granting the proposed permanent and temporary construction easements to another public agency can be found in the sub-section regarding long-term use of real property intended for specific City-approved purposes by others (475-11): “The proposed use must further the Council’s intended goals or policies for the specific property, and shall not conflict or preclude any existing or planned City use” and “The proposed use should be consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s General Plan for land use.”
3. Staff’s recommendation to receive the offered payment funds and reserve them for future open space uses is supported by policy found in the Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan (2006), Appendix C: Management of Open Space Lands, paragraph 13: “When compatible with the primary purpose of the open space, the City should use revenue from open space lands … to fund open space maintenance. Such revenues may also be used to acquire open space.”
DISCUSSION
Background
The Bob Jones Pathway (sometimes also referred to as the Bob Jones Trail and the Cityto-Sea Trail) was envisioned over 25 years ago as a pedestrian and bicycle facility to join the communities of San Luis Obispo and Avila Beach with a trail along San Luis Obispo Creek. Bob Jones was a passionate conservationist, co-founder of the pioneering environmental consulting firm, Jones & Stokes, and also served on the Board of Trustees of The Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County.
At present, there are two existing sections of the Bob Jones Pathway, a 2.5-mile segment between Ontario Road and Avila Beach operated by the County of San Luis Obispo and a 1.1-mile segment operated by the City of San Luis Obispo between Prado Road and Los Osos Valley Road.
Item 6h
The next new segment of the Bob Jones Pathway is being undertaken by the County of San Luis Obispo’s Parks and Recreation Department and Public Works Department and is a 4.4-mile segment stretching from the Octagon Barn Center located off of South Higuera Street and the existing Ontario Road staging area1. At this time, the County has completed and certified an Environmental Impact Report for the project and has been awarded $18.25 million in funding through a State of California Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant facility. Project engineering and design is nearing completion, and the right-of-way acquisition process is now underway.
Filipponi Ecological Reserve
One such property that will require right-of-way acquisition is owned by the City of San Luis Obispo, commonly known as the “Filipponi Ecological Reserve”. The City acquired approximately 70 acres of land from the Filipponi family in April 2000 that had once been part of the larger Filipponi Ranch; however, the property was bifurcated by the construction of the US 101 freeway. The remaining, subject land on the east side of US 101 was farmed over the years, but in wet winters the land would flood from time-to-time resulting in loss of crops and overall utility given that it is part of the historic floodplain along the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Following acquisition of the land, the City partnered with The Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County to implement a series of wetland and floodplain restoration projects. Due to the site characteristics and poor access from South Higuera, the City has historically only allowed for docent-led and educational outings at the property.
It is important to note that the City acquired the Filipponi Ecological Reserve, in part, with grants funds from the California Department of Transportation’s “Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program” (EEMP). As a required condition of that grant facility, an “Agreement Declaring Restrictive Covenants” was recorded on title to the property to ensure that the property is only used in a manner consistent with the purposes of the grant. Staff from the City, County, and local office of Cal Trans have conferred on the matter and agree that the small area of the easements along the frontage of the property, as further described herein, will not significantly impair or interfere with the conservation purposes of the property acquisition and the EEMP grant.
County of San Luis Obispo Offer Package
The County of San Luis Obispo’s Public Works Department has delivered to the City an offer package dated as of March 1, 2024 (Attachment B). The key highlights of the package are as follows:
1 Another future, connecting segment of the Bob Jones Pathway between Los Osos Valley Road and the Octagon Barn Center will be undertaken by the City of San Luis Obispo. This is considered a “Tier 1” project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan given the funding that has been acquired by the County for their project (page 147).
Item 6h
Purchase Request
The County is seeking to purchase from the City a perpetual easement for the pathway totalling 0.86 acres and a temporary construction easement for a three-year term totalling
3.32 acres. These easements would encumber three separate parcels owned by the City within the site. Both the permanent easement and the temporary construction easements are shown graphically at Exhibit B of the package. The permanent easement is legally described and depicted at Exhibit B-1.
Valuation and Offer Price
An appraisal was conducted in order to determine the fair market value of the easement interests proposed to be purchased, dated as of March 2, 2023. The valuation process is based on a highest and best use of the land for rural residential / agricultural production and relies on the comparable sales approach to value; the cost approach and income approach to valuation were not applicable because the City’s property does not have any improvements and does not produce income.
The value for the perpetual easement was determined to be $34,830. The value for the temporary construction easement was determined to be $29,880. A severance damage payment of $3,015 was also included in the offer. Just compensation and the proposed purchase price is therefore a total of $67,700.00 (rounded).
Overview of Easement Terms
The full text of the proposed permanent and temporary construction easements is included with the offer package that is Attachment B to this Council Agenda Report. A brief overview of easement terms is below:
a) The easement for the pathway is perpetual and non-exclusive. b) The purpose of the easement for the pathway is for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair, and use (including emergency use) as a public multi-use pathway.
c) The pathway would be open to the public from one-half hour prior to sunrise until one-half hour after sunset for pedestrian and bicycle use. d) The County would post signs and install fencing, as well as conduct patrol, enforcement, and all maintenance activities in accordance with County regulations and standards.
e) The temporary construction easement is for a three-year term. f) The County would restore the temporary construction easement area to the condition that generally existing prior to construction. g) The County would implement and is fully responsible for the Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Program required by the Environmental Impact Report for the Bob Jones Pathway Project.
h) The easement document includes indemnification by the County, as well as standard terms and conditions for an easement instrument.
Item 6h
Previous Council Action
The City Council approved the purchase of this property by adoption of Resolution No. 8987 (1999 Series) and the acquisition was completed on April 12, 2000. On June 19, 2021, Council approved a “Conceptual Restoration and Enhancement Plan” and since that time has also approved several restoration and mitigation projects conducted by others upon the property.
Public Engagement
An extensive public engagement process was conducted leading up to the adoption of the City’s Active Transportation Plan, wherein the Bob Jones Pathway was specifically discussed. The County of San Luis Obispo has also conducted numerous public meetings regarding the project over the course of the past 20 years. Any member of the public may comment on this item either in writing or in-person at the hearing.
General Plan Conformity
California Government Code Section 65402 requires that the Planning Commission make a finding that an acquisition or disposal of real property for public purposes, such as contemplated herein, is consistent with the General Plan. On December 9, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Active Transportation Plan (subsequently adopted by City Council in February 2021), which identified the Bob Jones Pathway Project. The Planning Commission’s action included approval of a General Plan Conformity report that was included as Attachment 4 to the Planning Commission Agenda Report for that hearing.
CONCURRENCE
The Public Works Transportation Engineering Division has participated in the processing of this item and concurs with the recommendation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The County of San Luis Obispo is the lead agency for the environmental determination for its Bob Jones Pathway Project under the California Environmental Quality Act and is also responsible for all applicable regulatory agency permitting and requirements. The recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County Board of Supervisors on February 24, 2015 (SCH # 2010031121).
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2023-24
Funding Identified: N/A
Item 6h
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund
State
Federal
Fees
Other:
Total N/A N/A N/A N/A
The County of San Luis Obispo will make a lump sum payment in the amount of $67,700.00 to the City of San Luis Obispo as “good and valuable consideration” for the subject easements. Per Conservation and Open Space Element policy, as discussed above, this revenue should be reserved for future open space maintenance or acquisition purposes.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may ask questions or request further clarification from staff, may request changes prior to approval, or may decide not to approve the recommendations contained in this Council Agenda Report. A decision not to approve, however, is not recommended by staff because this request is in furtherance of a long-standing community project of regional significance, is consistent with numerous City goals and policies, and may jeopardize the $18.25 million in grant funding that has been secured by the County of San Luis Obispo.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution authorizing the sale of a perpetual trail easement and a temporary construction easement for the County of San Luis Obispo’s Bob Jones Pathway Project
B - Offer Package received from the County of San Luis Obispo
R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2024 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF A PERPETUAL
EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR
THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO’S BOB JONES PATHWAY
PROJECT THAT WILL ENCUMBER PORTIONS OF PROPERTY
OWNED BY THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 076-061-075, 076-061-078, AND 076- 121-018 COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE FILIPPONI ECOLOGICAL
RESERVE
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has adopted policies and procedures for protection, management, and public use of open space lands and natural and cultural resources acquired by the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo owns and manages open space areas totaling over 4,000 acres, including the approximately 70-acre Filipponi Ecological Reserve; and
WHEREAS, the County of San Luis Obispo has received grant funding to construct and implement its Bob Jones Pathway Project, a multi-use bicycle and pedestrian facility, which will necessitate their purchase of both a 0.86-acre permanent easement for the pathway and a 3.32-acre temporary construction easement from the City of San Luis Obispo that will encumber portions of the Filipponi Ecological Reserve; and WHEREAS, the County of San Luis Obispo has identified the specific easement areas needed for the project, prepared an appraisal to determine the fair market value of the easements, set forth a satisfactory form of easement agreement, and has made an offer to pay the fair market value for the easements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings of the City in approving the real property transaction described herein.
SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The County of San Luis Obispo is the lead agency for the environmental determination for its Bob Jones Pathway Project under the California Environmental Quality Act and is also responsible for all applicable regulatory agency permitting and requirements. The re-circulated Draft Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County Board of Supervisors on February 24, 2015 (SCH # 2010031121).
Resolution No. _____ (2024 Series) Page 2
R ______
SECTION 3. Bob Jones Pathway Project. The City Council hereby accepts the offer from the County of San Luis Obispo and authorizes the sale of the permanent and temporary easements in accordance with the offer package dated March 1, 2024, based on the following findings:
a) The sale of the permanent and temporary construction easements is consistent with various City of San Luis Obispo policy documents including the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan (2014), as well as the adopted Climate Action Plan for Community Recovery (2020) and the Active Transportation Plan (2021).
b) The sale of the permanent and temporary construction easements is consistent with the City of San Luis Obispo’s policies and procedures for real property acquisition and disposal found at Section 475 of the Financial Management Manual, which further incorporates City Charter Article IX, Section 906 and City Council Resolution No. 10052 (2009 Series).
Specifically, granting the permanent and temporary construction easements to another public agency is consistent with the sub-section regarding longterm use of real property intended for specific City-approved purposes by others (475-11): “The proposed use must further the Council’s intended goals or policies for the specific property, and shall not conflict or preclude any existing or planned City use” and “The proposed use should be consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s General Plan for land use.”
c) On December 9, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Active Transportation Plan (subsequently adopted by City Council in February 2021), which identified the Bob Jones Pathway Project. In accordance with California Government Code Section 65402, the Planning Commission’s action included approval of a General Plan Conformity report that was included as Attachment 4 to the Planning Commission Agenda Report for that hearing.
d) The sale of the permanent and temporary construction easements is consistent with the conservation purposes of the property, as well as the grant funding that was provided by the California Department of Transportation’s “Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program” (EEMP) that was awarded at the time of the property acquisition (1999/2000) and the “Agreement Declaring Restrictive Covenants” that was recorded on title to ensure that the property is only used in a manner consistent with the purposes of the grant, because the small area of the easements that will encumber the frontage area of the property will not significantly impair or interfere with the conservation purposes of the property and the EEMP grant.
Resolution No. _____ (2024 Series) Page 3
R ______
e) The appraisal methodology and valuation, dated as of March 2, 2023, represents fair market value for the permanent and temporary construction easements and the offered sum of $67,700.00 is just compensation.
Upon motion of Council Member ___________, seconded by Council Member ___________, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _______________ 2024. ___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
Item 6i
Department: Fire
Cost Center: 8502
For Agenda of: 4/2/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Todd Tuggle, Fire Chief
Prepared By: Nicole Vert, Business Analyst
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR REGIONAL
CRASH RESPONSE AND EXTRICATION IMPROVEMENT GRANT
PROGRAM THROUGH CALIFORNIA’S OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
GRANT PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
1. Authorize the Fire Department to apply for funding under California’s Office of Traffic Safety grant program to purchase modern extrication equipment; and
2. Authorize the City Manager, or Fire Chief as their designee, to execute the grant documents and approve the budget changes necessary to appropriate the grant amount upon notification that the grant has been awarded.
POLICY CONTEXT
The recommended actions are consistent with the City of San Luis Obispo’s Financial Management Manual, Section 740 - Grant Management Policy. The policy states that Council will approve all grant applications in excess of $5,000 and delegate receipt and contract execution to the City Manager.
The work conducted under the grant is in line with the City’s Major City Goal of Climate Action, Open Space, and Sustainable Transportation by proactively addressing the climate crisis through replacing diesel powered equipment with clean running electric extrication tools (e-draulic).
DISCUSSION
State, federal, and non-profit grants are occasionally offered to assist local governments with the financial impacts associated with daily operations and/or mandated programs.
The Fire Department actively seeks out these opportunities to enhance the effectiveness of the Department while increasing fiscal sustainability for the city. A recent grant opportunity was identified, which is in line with these goals and addresses a current need for the city: the Regional Crash Response and Extrication Improvement Grant Program through the California Office of Traffic Safety.
Item 6i
Staff recommends seeking $169,354.00 in grant funding to purchase four sets of e-draulic extrication tools for the department, allowing for each front-line apparatus to have an updated modern set.
The e-draulic equipment is more powerful in all aspects, including cutting and spreading forces. Newer vehicles are becoming increasingly more difficult to cut through as new technology is being integrated and the stronger tools can reach victims quickly. The new tools are smaller and lighter with fewer pieces than the conventional internal combustion powered hydraulic tools currently in use. The new e-draulic extrication tool allows for quicker response to crash victims, especially those that are far off the roadway, such as on Cuesta Grade, where firefighters must rappel down to victims with the equipment. The requested equipment also aligns with the City’s Major City Goal of carbon neutrality by 2035 through reduction of the use of internal combustion engines (for the hydraulic power heads) in favor of the electric powered e-draulic extrication equipment.
Background
The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grants program is funded by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The OTS awards more that $100 million annually in innovative, evidence-based education and enforcement programs and technologies designed to improve road safety. The OTS evaluates all potential programs to make sure California addresses current and future traffic safety needs.
The OTS has identified ten priority areas of concentration for grant funding, one being Emergency Medical Services program. Providing timely care to crash victims is critical to reducing deaths and the severity of injuries. The program’s goals include decreasing the average extrication time, from the time of arrival at the crash site to transport. Funded activities include replacing extrication tools for fire departments to meet the above goal.
Public Engagement
This item is on the agenda for the April 2, 2024, City Council meeting and will follow all required postings and notifications. The public will have an opportunity to comment on this item at or before the meeting.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. If the work associated with the grant funding requires environmental review, staff will not proceed with the project until a review has been completed.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2023-24
Funding Identified: Yes
Item 6i
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $ $ 169,354.00 $ $0
State
Federal
Fees
Other:
Total $ $169,354.00 $ $0
The Office of Traffic Safety grant program does not require a match. The department currently owns extrication tools that range in age from 13 to 20 years old and already require ongoing maintenance that is budgeted. The replacement tools will not increase the departments ongoing budget.
ALTERNATIVES
The Council could decide not to pursue the grant funding. This is not recommended as fire service grant opportunities are limited and the grant funds would only serve to enhance the City’s safety and resilience while increasing fiscal sustainability for the City.
Item 6j
Department: Utilities
Cost Center: 6107
For Agenda of: 4/2/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Aaron Floyd, Utilities Director
Prepared By: Chris Lehman, Deputy Director – Wastewater Meg Buckingham, Solid Waste and Recycling Program Manager SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
FOR ON-CALL SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING CONSULTANT
SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for on-call solid waste and recycling consultant services; and
2. Authorize the Utilities Director to execute professional service agreements with the selected consultants to create a 2024-2029 on-call list; and
3. Authorize the Finance Director to execute and amend purchase orders for individual professional service agreements in an amount not-to-exceed the authorized project budget.
POLICY CONTEXT
The Solid Waste and Recycling Program in the Utilities Department often utilizes consultant services for projects related to solid waste and recycling legislation, meeting the circular economy and waste diversion goals specified in the City’s Climate Action Plan, and management of the City’s franchise agreements for solid waste, mixed recyclables, and organics collection.
Municipal Code Section 3.24.070 authorizes staff to procure these types of "specialized services" when consultants are on "an approved list of on-call consultants that is established by a formal RFQ process." Section 3.24.070 (C) further states that "The Council shall approve the RFQ, and the purchasing authority is authorized to execute agreements with the selected consultants. The Finance Director is authorized to execute and amend purchase orders for individual consultant services contracts in an amount notto-exceed the authorized project budget. On-call consultant lists shall be renewed at least every five years by a new RFQ process.”
DISCUSSION
Item 6j
Background
The Solid Waste and Recycling Program coordinates the planning, development, and implementation of programs and services related to solid waste, recycling, organics recycling, zero waste, and other waste diversion programs.
Staff utilize consultant support on a routine basis for assistance with complex and technical projects, expert/professional review of reports received from contractors, and in times when staff do not have the capacity to complete a time-sensitive project. Section B (Scope of Work) of the RFQ provided in Attachment A lists the services that the selected consultants may be asked to provide to the City over the course of five years. Some examples of projects that the selected on-call consultants could expect include review of integrated solid waste management rates from the franchised garbage company, rate studies, franchise agreement review, rate setting development, waste characterization and generation study completion, and guidance on compliance with impactful State legislation.
Due to the frequent need for consultant services for projects that range in scope and complexity, an on-call list comprised of qualified candidates with assorted specialties would benefit the program by providing a more streamlined selection process. Maintaining an on-call list of consultants with diverse backgrounds means the City may become aware of a broader spectrum of consultants, thereby increasing the City’s choices, and maximizing the potential to obtain the highest quality and most cost-effective consultant for the project.
Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
The Solid Waste and Recycling Program has not opened a RFQ for on-call consultants.
Public Engagement
Public comment may be provided to the City Council through written correspondence prior to the meeting and through public testimony at the meeting. If approved by the City Council, the RFQ (Attachment A) will be posted in BidSync.
CONCURRENCE
The Finance Department concurs with the issuance of the RFQ and assisted with its development.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The recommended actions are not a “project” as defined under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because the action will not result in any physical change to the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: N/A
Funding Identified: Yes
Item 6j
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $ $ $
State
Federal
Fees
Other: AB 939
Designation
$222,859
Total $222,859 $ $ $
Issuing the RFQ and establishing a qualified on-call list for solid waste and recycling consultant services does not obligate any funds for consultant work. However, the program has identified funding when projects do arise from General Fund “assigned” fund balance (AB 939 Designation).
AB 939 fees are collected from the garbage company and may only be used to pay for activities that divert waste from the landfill. Any remaining funds at the end of the year are put into the AB 939 Designation for future use. There is currently $222,859 of assigned funds from prior fiscal years that are eligible to be used for projects the on-call list of consultants would complete.
When the on-call agreement is executed and projects are identified, quotes will be requested from on-call consultants and purchase orders will be issued at the discretion of the Finance Director.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not approve the RFQ release. The City Council could decline authority for staff to issue the RFQ and execute contracts. This is not recommended as it would require substantial staff time to return to the City Council for authorization to open Request for Proposals for individual solid waste and recycling projects.
ATTACHMENTS
A - RFQ for On-Call Solid Waste and Recycling Consultant Services
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including disabled persons in all of our services, programs and activities.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410.
Notice Requesting Qualifications for On-Call Solid Waste and Recycling Consultant Services 2024-2029 The City of San Luis Obispo (“City”) is requesting proposals for solid waste and recycling consultant services in a variety of areas associated with the management and administration of the City’s waste and recycling program as specified in this Request for Qualifications (RFQ).
All interested firms must register with BidSync at www.BidSync. com, where proposers can obtain RFQ packages and submit questions - BidSync (https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-appweb/vendor/register/Login.xhtml) Proposals responsive to the RFQ will be reviewed by staff in the Solid Waste Program of the Utilities Department as they are received and must be completely uploaded on BidSync at or before [Date], 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time. Proposals received after said time will not be considered.
Proposals shall be submitted using the forms provided in this RFQ package. Proposals submitted in any manner not specified above will not be accepted.
RFQ packages and additional information may be obtained at the City’s BidSync website at www.BidSync.com. Please contact Meg Buckingham, Solid Waste and Recycling Program Manager at [email protected] for any questions about the content of the RFQ.
For technical help with BidSync please contact BidSync tech support at 800 -990-9339.
A. INTRODUCTION
The City is requesting qualifications from qualified consultants to provide solid waste and recycling consultant services (“Consultant Services”). The Solid Waste and Recycling Program of the City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department coordinates the planning, development, and implementation of programs and services related to solid waste, recycling, organics recycling, zero waste, and other waste diversion programs, but is either not adequately staffed to perform all necessary tasks to the fullest extent or require expert technical assistance.
Consultants should expect projects and tasks that will relate to meeting the legislative and regulatory requirements of Senate Bill 1383 and other solid waste and recycling related legislation; meeting the circular economy and waste diversion-related goals specified in the City’s Climate Action Plan; and management of the City’s franchise agreements for solid waste, mixed recyclables, and organics collection.
Full-time, regular staff dedicated to this program area include the Utilities Director, Deputy Director of Wastewater, Solid Waste and Recycling Program Manager, and Solid Waste and Recycling Coordinator.
The City is interested in generating a list of qualified consultants specializing in this type of work to draw from as needed.
B. SCOPE OF WORK
The City is requesting proposals for Consultant Services in a variety of solid waste and recycling related program areas to establish a list of qualified firms and individuals for contract work the City may need during a five-year period.
The City requests information regarding the qualifications of consultants and consulting firms interested in providing solid waste and recycling consultant services to the City, as needed, via an established list of on-call outside consultants (“On-call List”). The City is interested in retaining a diverse group of firms and individuals who will be placed on the On-call List to provide high-quality consulting services.
Selection of solid waste and recycling consultants is based on the qualifications and program area experience, quality of work, articulate approach to controlling costs and adhering to budgets, and effectiveness in communicating with the City.
In addition to being placed on the On-call List, selected consultants or consulting firms will enter into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) (attached to this RFP in Exhibit A. PSAs for specific engagements will include (1) a written scope of work, (2) a capped “not to exceed” amount, including the circumstances under which initial payment terms may be modified; and (3) the names of the individual consultants in the consulting firm assigned to work on the matter along with their hourly rate(s), which shall be consistent with the proposal submitted for this RFQ.
Placement on the On-call List does not guarantee that the consultant or consulting firm will be engaged to provide services. Consultant Services will be used on an as-needed, case by case, or matter by matter basis.
Outside consultant services may involve one or more of the following areas:
1. Planning Activities
• Strategic planning
• Sustainable and zero waste planning
• Waste characterizations/audits
• Disaster debris management
• Financial: budgeting, modeling, cost and revenue studies, funding alternatives, fee development
• Facility design and evaluation
• Program design and evaluation
• Policy and ordinance development
• Grant application and management
• Organizational and informational flow system assessment and design • Extended producer responsibility: local assessment, implementation
2. Legislative Compliance and Outreach Assistance
• Outreach campaigns: development, content creation, marketing • Generator compliance: monitoring, route reviews, lid flipping, audits, assistance, custom outreach
• Stakeholder outreach: community workshops, public opinion surveys, focus groups • Program tracking, reporting, and monitoring
3. Operations and Performance
• Franchise agreement/hauler contract compliance reviews • Rate reviews and setting, audits, studies, and analysis: cost of service, fees, customer rates, payments, billing system functions, collection operations, transfer operations • Other reviews and analysis: management, administrative function, collection system productivity, vehicle routing
• Benchmarking: metrics/standards development, enhancement strategies, tracking, monitoring
• Proposition 218 and 26 assistance, and other propositions that may become pertinent
4. Contract Procurement, Management, and Negotiations Assistance • Collection system service options evaluation
• Policy and program development and analysis
• Annual rate adjustment mechanisms
• Performance standards and penalties
• Request for proposals: development, technical and financial evaluation • Franchise agreement/hauler contracts: development, review, monitoring • Rate models and rate structure analysis and development
5. Any other miscellaneous projects or tasks relating to the solid waste and recycling industry
C. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Requirement to Meet All Provisions. Each individual or firm submitting a proposal (“Candidate”) shall meet all the terms, and conditions of the RFQ project package. By virtue of its proposal submittal, the bidder acknowledges agreement with and acceptance of all provisions of the RFQ specifications.
2. Proposal Submittal. Each proposal must be submitted on the form(s) provided in Section I of these specifications and be accompanied by the other required submittals and supplemental materials. Proposal documents shall be submitted electronically via BidSync.
3. Insurance Certificate. Each proposal must include a certificate of insurance showing:
a. The insurance carrier and its A.M. Best rating.
b. Scope of coverage and limits.
c. Deductibles and self-insured retention.
The purpose of this submittal is to generally assess the adequacy of the Candidate’s insurance coverage during proposal evaluation; endorsements are not required until contract award. The City’s insurance requirements are detailed in Exhibit B.
5. Proposal Withdrawal and Opening. A Candidate may withdraw its proposal, without prejudice, prior to the time specified for the proposal opening, by submitting a written request to the Director of Finance for its withdrawal. No proposal received after the time specified or at any place other than that stated in the “Notice Inviting Bids/Requesting Proposals” will be considered.
6. Submittal of One Proposal Only. No individual or business entity of any kind shall be allowed to make or file, or to be interested as the primary submitter in more than one proposal, except an alternative proposal when specifically requested; however, an individual or business entity that has submitted a sub-proposal to a Candidate submitting a proposal, or who has quoted prices on materials to such Candidate, is not thereby disqualified from submitting a sub-proposal or from quoting prices to other Candidates submitting proposals.
7. Communications. All timely requests for information submitted in writing via BidSync prior to the date indicated in the RFQ will receive a response. Telephone communications with City staff are not encouraged but will be permitted. However, any such oral communication shall not be binding on the City.
CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION
8. Proposal Retention and Award. The City reserves the right to retain all proposals in accordance with the retention schedule (currently two years from decision for all unsuccessful proposals and five years past audit for successful ones). The City also reserves the right to waive non-substantial irregularities in any proposal, to reject any or all proposals, to reject or delete one part of a
proposal and accept the other, except to the extent that proposals are qualified by specific limitations. See the “special terms and conditions” in Section D of these specifications for proposal evaluation and contract award criteria.
9. Competency and Responsibility of Candidate. The City reserves full discretion to determine the competence and responsibility, professionally and/or financially, of Candidates. Candidates will provide, in a timely manner, all information that the City deems necessary to make such a decision.
10. Form of Agreement. Additional contract terms and conditions that Candidate will be expected to execute and be bound by when assigned a matter from their position on the On-Call List are listed in the Form of Agreement (Exhibit A).
D. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. 2. Term. The On-call List created from this RFQ will be active for the five-year period, commencing on the date the Form of Agreement is executed and expiring after five (5) years.
3. Proposal Review/ Candidate Selection to the List. The City will develop the On-call List based upon the responses to this RFQ. Responses will be evaluated as set forth in in Section F of these specifications.
4. Consultant Selection and Compensation. Acceptance onto the On-Call List does not guarantee that any work will be assigned to Consultant. The decision to retain Consultant Services will be that of the City on a case-by-case basis or matter-by-matter basis. Proposed fee structures should take into account the five-year life of the On-call List, and Candidates are encouraged to include in their proposal any fee escalator information that will be relevant to cost evaluation over the life of the On-call List.
5. Non-Exclusive Contract. During the life of the On-call List, the City reserves the right to enter into agreements for solid waste and recycling consultant services with persons or firms who do not respond to the RFQ. The City further reserves the right to waive responses to any part of this request if, in its sole judgment, it determines that it is in the best interests of the City to do so.
The City may require any Candidate to participate in negotiations and to submit such other information or documentation as it may deem necessary as conditions of awarding a contract.
The City reserves the right to vary or waive requirements for different Candidates as shall fit the City’s needs for a particular type of engagement or area of representation.
E. SUBMITTAL CONTENT AND FORM
1. Letter of Interest (5-page maximum). Please include in the submittal a letter introducing the Candidate and expressing the Candidate’s interest in being considered for on-call consulting services, clearly identifying the applicable sub-area(s) of interest. The letter of interest should also include all of the following:
a. Provide the name of the entity, its mailing address, telephone, facsimile number. b. Please describe the organization.
c. Indicate that the Candidate has the availability and time to dedicate the personnel and resources necessary to provide on-call consulting services. d. Indicate that the Candidate has the minimum qualifications listed to perform any variety of the tasks outlined in Section B.
e. Indicate the intention of the Candidate to adhere to the provisions described in the RFQ. (If selected to provide on-call consulting services, the Candidate will be expected to sign a service provider agreement with the City.)
f. Please identify the contact person responsible for the submittal, specifying the name, title, and contact information. Please note that the person signing the letter of interest must be a legal representative of the Candidate authorized to bind the Candidate to an agreement in the event of an award.
g. Provide a brochure or list of relevant services that can be provided, including but not limited to services outlined in Section B.
2. Relevant Experience of Key Personnel and the Firm (10-page maximum). a. Key Personnel Experience. The submittal must identify the key personnel that is to be assigned if awarded a contract, detailing their qualifications, areas of expertise, a summary of their past experience performing similar services for other jurisdictions, and a resume of each key personnel, including experience working with City staff, local San Luis Obispo community groups and decision- makers, and regional partner agencies. b. Firm Experience. The submittal must describe the Firm' s pertinent project experience, including a list of performed relevant projects, past performance, individual or team accomplishments, and examples of similar work for San Luis Obispo or neighboring jurisdictions in California, including experience working with City staff, local San Luis Obispo community groups and decision- makers, and regional partner agencies. c. General Firm Information. General firm information including the number of employees, location of firm headquarters, branch offices, and the number of years in business may also be provided. Please note that general firm information is not a substitute for the specific information requested in the above Sections E -2a and b. d. Any other information that would assist us in making this award decision.
3. Fee Structure. Please include a clear and comprehensive fee schedule, including a detailed statement of hourly rates for all positions and classifications of individuals involved that would be necessary to render service as noted in the Scope of Work above on a project- by-project basis.
Provide a list of expenses being proposed to be billed in addition to legal fees, including the basis for such expenses.
5. Submittal of Proposal Forms. Each Candidate shall submit completed version of the three required forms in Section I.
a. Acknowledgement of RFQ specifications.
b. References from at least three firms for whom you have provided similar services. c. Statement of Contract Disqualifications.
d. Certificate of insurance.
6. Additional Services. If there are related services not otherwise identified in the City' s RFQ, the Candidate may offer those to the City. Proposals are not required to address any additional
services in order to be considered an acceptable proposal.
F. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION
Proposals will be evaluated by a selection panel made up of members from the Utilities Department Solid Waste and Recycling Program. The panel will score the qualification materials submitted on a zero to 100- point scale, excluding bonus points, based upon the following criteria.
Consultants who qualify will be placed on the list of qualified on-call consultants for each subarea.
Placement on the list of qualified on-call consultants is not a guarantee of work and does not constitute a commitment by the City to enter into a contract with the Consultant. As appropriate, the City may conduct an additional competitive process ( e.g., solicit bids or issue Requests for Proposals) prior to awarding contracts. The City anticipates that all services will be on an as-needed or on-call basis.
1. Letter of Interest. Demonstrated competence and the capacity and professional qualifications necessary to provide the Consulting Services specified in the RFQ. Ability to meet standard City contract and insurance requirements.
2. Relevant Experience. Demonstrated ability, based on consultant experience and specific experience of key personnel, to provide technical assistance on the types of tasks listed in the RFQ. Consultants need not necessarily be experts in every task in a given sub-area in order to achieve a favorable score. Prior experience, including the ability to work with City staff, local San Luis Obispo community groups and decision- makers, and regional partner agencies. (30 Points Maximum)
3. Responsiveness to the RFQ. Presentation, completeness, and clarity of information provided.
4. Fee Structure. The Candidate’s cost competitiveness and reasonableness. (20 Points Maximum)
5. Client References. (Pass/ Fail)
6. Additional Information. Information about how your company mitigates the environmental impact of its services, such as greenhouse gas emissions, amount of waste generated, water and energy use, or other areas related to your products and services.
G. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Nondiscrimination. The City will not discriminate against any interested consultant on the grounds of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, disability, marital status, pregnancy, sex, age, or sexual orientation.
2. City's Right to Modify RFQ. The City reserves the right at its sole discretion to modify this RFQ including but not limited to the selection criteria) should the City deem that it isin its best interests to do so. Any changes to the proposal requirements will be made by written addendum. The failure of a consultant to read the latest addendums shall have no effect on the validity of such modification.
3. City' s Right to Cancel RFQ. The City reserves the right at its sole discretion to cancel this RFQ in part or in its entirety should the City deem that it is in the City' s best interests to do so.
4. City' s Right to Reject All Submittals. The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to reject all submittals should the City deem that it is in its best interests to do so.
5. City's Right to Extend RFQ Deadlines. The City reserves the right to extend the deadline for submittals by written addendum should the City deem that it is in its best interests to do so.
6. City’s Right to Negotiate With Consultants. The City reserves the right to negotiate with the consultants on the list of qualified on-call consultants regarding their exceptions to the standard service provider agreement. If any, or regarding other price and terms in their submittals and to require the selected Consultant to submit such technical, price, or other revisions of their submittals as may result from negotiations.
7. Standard Form Service Provider Agreement & Insurance. Consultants acknowledge that placement on the list of qualified on-call consultants does not commit the City to award a contract. For any project, the City reserves the right to award a contract to consultants 1) that are on the list of qualified on-call consultants; (2) that have an existing contract with the City, or (3) that are selected through a separate competitive process.
Consultants on the list of qualified on-call consultants who are awarded a contract will be expected to sign a service provider agreement with the City. The standard service provider agreement and associated insurance requirements are attached as Exhibit A and B. Comments or exceptions, if any, to the standard service provider agreement and/ or insurance requirements must be noted in the Letter of Interest. It is understood that consultants have reviewed the service provider agreement (Exhibit A) and will take exception only to those items identified in their Letter of Interest.
Neither review of the submittal by the City nor placement on the list of qualified on-call consultants constitutes an acceptance by the City of the Proposer's recommended changes to the service provider agreement. If there are any concerns or proposed exceptions requested to the standard service provider agreement, these issues will be discussed at the time the City awards a contract, if any.
8. Cost of Submittals. All costs incurred during submittal preparation or in any way associated with the Consultant' s preparations or submission shall be the sole responsibility of the Candidate.
9. Liability for Submittal Errors. Candidates are liable for all errors and omissions contained in their submittals.
10. Permits and Licenses. Candidates, at their sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of any agreement all appropriate permits, certificates, and licenses including, but not limited to, a City Business License, which will be required in connection with the performance of on-call consulting services.
H. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Ownership of Materials. All original drawings, plan documents and other materials prepared by or in possession of the Consultant as part of the work or services under these specifications shall become the permanent property of the City and shall be delivered to the City upon demand.
2. Release of Reports and Information. Any reports, information, data, or other material given to, prepared by, or assembled by the Consultant as part of the work or services under these specifications shall be the property of the City and shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the Consultant without the prior written approval of the City.
3. Copies of Reports and Information. If the City requests additional copies of reports, drawings, specifications, or any other material in addition to what the Consultant is required to furnish in limited quantities as part of the work or services under these specifications, the Consultant shall provide such additional copies as are requested, and City shall compensate the Consultant for the costs of duplicating of such copies at the Consultant’s direct expense.
SECTION I: PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORMS
1. Acknowledgement of RFQ Specifications
The undersigned declares that she or he:
Has carefully examined [____________], which is hereby made a part of this proposal. Is thoroughly familiar with its contents.
Is authorized to represent the proposing firm.
Agrees to perform the work as set forth in this proposal.
Certificate of insurance attached; insurance company’s A.M. Best rating: __________________.
Firm Name and Address
Contact Phone
Signature of Authorized Representative
Date
2. References
Number of years engaged in providing the services included within the scope of the specifications under the present business name: .
Describe fully the last three contracts performed by your firm that demonstrate your ability to provide the services included with the scope of the specifications. Attach additional pages if required. The City reserves the right to contact each of the references listed for additional information regarding your firm's qualifications.
Reference No. 1:
Agency Name
Contact Name
Telephone & Email
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Description of services provided
including contract amount, when
provided and project outcome
Reference No. 2:
Agency Name
Contact Name
Telephone & Email
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Description of services provided
including contract amount, when
provided and project outcome
Reference No. 3
Agency Name
Contact Name
Telephone & Email
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Description of services provided
including contract amount, when
provided and project outcome
3. Statement of Past Contract Disqualifications
The Candidate shall state whether it or any of its officers or employees who have a proprietary interest in it, has ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of the violation of law, a safety regulation, or for any other reason, including but not limited to financial difficulties, project delays, or disputes regarding work or product quality, and if so to explain the circumstances. Do you have any disqualification as described in the above paragraph to declare? Yes □ No □
If yes, explain the circumstances.
Executed on at _______________________________________ under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct. ______________________________________
Signature of Authorized Candidate Representative
EXHIBIT A : DRAFT FORM OF AGREEMENT
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into in the City of San Luis Obispo on ____________, by and between the City of San Luis Obispo, a municipal corporation and charter city (City) and [FILL] hereinafter referred to as Contractor (collectively referred to as the “Parties”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on [date], City requested proposals for solid waste and recycling on-call consulting services; and
WHEREAS, the City wants to utilizes consultant services for projects relating to utilize consultant services for projects and tasks relating to solid waste and recycling legislation, meeting the circular economy and waste diversion-related goals specified in the City’s Climate Action Plan, and management of the City’s franchise agreements for solid waste, mixed recyclables, and organics collection (the “Services”); and
WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified to perform this type of Services and has submitted a written proposal to do so, which has been accepted by City; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations, and covenants hereinafter contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date this Agreement is made and entered, as first written above with a duration of five (5) years.
2. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. The City Request for Qualifications for on-call services and Consultant's proposal dated [date] are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement, attached as Exhibit A. The City’s insurance requirements are hereby incorporated in and made part of this Agreement, attached as Exhibit B. To the extent that there are any conflicts between the Consultant’s fees and scope of work and the City’s terms and conditions as stated herein, the City’s terms and conditions shall prevail unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing signed by both Parties.
3. CITY’S OBLIGATIONS. For providing services as specified in this Agreement, City will pay and Consultant shall receive therefor compensation in accordance with the Consultant’s submitted rates in the RFQ.
4. CONSULTANT’S OBLIGATIONS. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements herein before mentioned to be made and performed by City, Consultant agrees with City to do everything required by this Agreement including that work as set forth in Exhibit A.
5. PAYMENT OF TAXES. The contract prices shall include full compensation for all taxes that Consultant is required to pay.
6. LICENSES AND PERMITS. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the Services described
in this Agreement. The Consultant shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices necessary under this Agreement.
7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of and shall observe and comply with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations, and county and City of San Luis Obispo ordinances, regulations and adopted codes, which in any manner affect those employed by Consultant or in any way affect the performance of the Services pursuant to this Agreement.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement.
8. COMPLIANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARD. Consultant shall provide services acceptable to City in strict conformance with the Agreement. Consultant shall also provide in accordance with the standards customarily called for under this Agreement using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable providers of such services. Where approval by the City, the City Manager, the Mayor, or other representative of City is required, it is understood to be general approval only and does not relieve Consultant of responsibility for complying with all applicable laws, codes, policies, regulations, and good business practices.
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor.
The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatsoever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing the Services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
10. PRESERVATION OF CITY PROPERTY. The Consultant shall provide and install suitable safeguards, approved by the City, to protect City property from injury or damage. If City property is injured or damaged resulting from Consultant’s operations, it shall be replaced or restored at Consultant’s expense. The City’s facilities shall be replaced or restored to a condition as good as when the Consultant began the work.
11. IMMIGRATION ACT OF 1986. The Consultant warrants on behalf of itself and all subconsultants engaged for the performance of the Services that only persons authorized to work in the United States pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and other applicable laws shall be employed in the performance of the Services hereunder.
12. NON-DISCRIMINATION. In the performance of the Services, the Consultant agrees that it will not engage in, nor permit such subconsultants as it may employ, to engage in discrimination in
employment of persons because of age, race, color, sex, national origin or ancestry, sexual orientation, or religion of such persons.
13. PAYMENT TERMS. The City’s payment terms are 30 days from the receipt of an original invoice and acceptance by the City of the materials, supplies, equipment, or services provided by the Consultant (Net 30). Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, or as soon thereafter as practical, for services provided in the previous month. Final June invoices shall be received no later than the 5th business day of July to meet City fiscal year-end deadlines. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. Any final payment under this Agreement shall be made within forty-five (45) days of receipt of an invoice, therefore.
14. INSPECTION. City shall at all times have the right to inspect the work being done under this Agreement and Consultant shall furnish City with every reasonable opportunity and assistance required for City to ascertain that the Services of the Consultant are being performed in accordance with the requirements and intentions of this Agreement. All work done, and all materials furnished, if any, shall be subject to the City’s inspection and approval. The inspection of such work shall not relieve Consultant of any of its obligations under the Agreement.
15. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants, shall not, without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions, or other discovery request (“Discovery”), court order, or subpoena from any person or party regarding this Agreement, unless the City is a party to any lawsuit, arbitration, or administrative proceeding connected to such Discovery, or unless Consultant is prohibited by law from informing the City of such Discovery. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing, or similar proceeding as allowed by law. Unless City is a party to the lawsuit, arbitration, or administrative proceeding and is averse to Consultant in such proceeding, Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide the opportunity to review any response to Discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit City to make transcripts or copies therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the Services under this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, at the Consultant's office and upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, copying and/or printing computer files. Consultant hereby grants to City all right, title, and interest, including any copyright, in and to the documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared by Consultant in the course of providing the Services under this Agreement.
17. INDEMNIFICATION AND DEFENSE. To the fullest extent permitted by law (including, but not limited to California Civil Code Sections 2782 and 2782.8), Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents (“City Indemnitees”), from and against any and all causes of action, claims, liabilities, obligations, judgments, or damages, including reasonable legal counsels’ fees and costs of litigation (“claims”), arising out of the Consultant’s performance or Consultant’s failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement or out of the operations conducted by Consultant, including the City’s passive negligence, except for such loss or damage arising from the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the City. In the event the City Indemnitees are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding arising from Consultant’s performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a defense to the City Indemnitees or at the City’s option, reimburse the City Indemnitees their costs of defense, including reasonable legal fees, incurred in defense of such claims.
18. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least thirty (30) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates
a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 14.
19. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. If, during the term of the Agreement, the City determines the Consultant is not faithfully abiding by any term or condition contained herein, the City may notify the Consultant in writing of such defect or failure to perform. This notice must give the Consultant a ten (10) calendar day notice of time thereafter in which to perform said work or cure the deficiency.
a. If the Consultant has not performed the work or cured the deficiency within the ten (10) days specified in the notice, such shall constitute a breach of the Agreement and the City may terminate the Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant to said effect (“Notice of Termination”). Thereafter, neither party shall have any further duties, obligations, responsibilities, or rights under the Agreement except to comply with the obligations upon termination.
b. In said event, the Consultant shall be entitled to the reasonable value of its services performed from the beginning date in which the breach occurs up to the day it received the City’s Notice of Termination, minus any offset from such payment representing the City’s damages from such breach. “Reasonable value” includes fees or charges for goods or services as of the last milestone or task satisfactorily delivered or completed by the Consultant as may be set forth in the Agreement payment schedule; compensation for any other work or services performed or provided by the Consultant shall be based solely on the City’s assessment of the value of the work-in-progress in completing the overall scope.
c. The City reserves the right to delay such payment until completion or confirmed abandonment of the project, as may be determined in the City’s sole discretion, so as to permit a full and complete accounting of costs. In no event, however, shall the Consultant be entitled to receive in excess of the not to exceed amount shown in this Agreement.
20. INSURANCE. Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B attached to and made part of this Agreement.
21. BUSINESS LICENSE & TAX. The Consultant must have a valid City of San Luis Obispo business license & tax certificate before execution of the contract. Additional information regarding the City’s business tax program may be obtained by calling (805) 781-7134.
22. SAFETY PROVISIONS. The Consultant shall conform to the rules and regulations pertaining to safety established by OSHA and the California Division of Industrial Safety.
23. PUBLIC AND EMPLOYEE SAFETY. Whenever the Consultant operations create a condition hazardous to the public or City employees, it shall, at its expense and without cost to the City, furnish, erect and maintain such fences, temporary railings, barricades, lights, signs and other devices and take such other protective measures as are necessary to prevent accidents or damage or injury to the public and employees.
24. UNDUE INFLUENCE. Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer or employee of the City in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the City has or will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling the City to any and all remedies at law or in equity.
25. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract, or its right, title or interest, or its power to execute such a contract to any individual or business entity of any kind without the previous written consent of the City. a. As required above, before retaining or contracting with any subconsultant for any services under this Agreement, City must consent to such assignment of performance in writing. For City to evaluate such proposed assignment, Consultant shall provide City with the identity of the proposed subconsultant, a copy of the proposed written contract between Consultant and such subconsultant, which shall include an indemnity provision similar to the one provided herein and identifying City as an indemnified party, or an incorporation of the indemnity provision provided herein, and proof that such proposed subconsultant carries insurance at least equal to that required by this Agreement or obtain a written waiver from City for such insurance.
26. AMENDMENT. Any amendment, modification, or variation from the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon approval by the appropriate review authority according to the City’s Financial Management Manual. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized by the City in advance and in writing.
27. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This written Agreement, including all writings specifically incorporated herein by reference, shall constitute the complete Agreement between the Parties hereto. No oral agreement, understanding, or representation not reduced to writing and specifically incorporated herein shall be of any force or effect, nor shall any such oral Agreement, understanding, or representation be binding upon the Parties hereto. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
28. NOTICE. All notices to the Parties hereto under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as, but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) United States Mail, certified, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. All such notices shall be delivered to the addressee or addressed as set forth below:
To City: [DEPT]
City of San Luis Obispo
[ADDRESS]
To Consultant: Name
Mailing Address
29. GOVERNING LAW. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement, and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the Parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.
30. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. Both City and Consultant do covenant that each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute Agreements for such party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed the day and year first above written.
CITY CONSULTANT
_______________________________
By: [Name]
Its: [Title of City Manager or Department Head]
_______________________________
By: [Name]
Its: [Title]
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
By: J. Christine Dietrick, City Attorney
EXHIBIT B: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Insurance Requirements – Standard Professional Services The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:
1. General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit of $2,000,000.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, official, employees, agents or volunteers.
2. For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty
(30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with a certificate of insurance showing maintenance of the required insurance coverage. Original endorsements effecting general liability and automobile liability coverage required by this clause must also be provided. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Memorandum
City of San Luis Obispo
Council Agenda Correspondence
DATE: April 2, 2024
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Matt Horn, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Erica Long, Project Manager II
VIA: Derek Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: ITEM 6K - AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE THE LAGUNA LAKE DOG PARK REVITALIZATION PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 2001068
Staff received the following questions and is recommending modifications to the staff report regarding the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization project report as follows:
1. Question: Is there a way to provide for additional bid alternates that could allow for more scope to be awarded if the bid is under the Publicly Disclosed Funding limit of $1,130,000?
Answer: Staff chose to separate the landscaping and irrigation as Additive Alternate A from the Base Bid to provide more certainty that a project with the primary elements of a dog park could be awarded. The scope of the base bid includes demolition, earthwork, fencing, flatwork, ground cover, and utility infrastructure within the approximate three-acre park. See the estimate table below for approximate construction cost per category of Base Bid work items.
Base Bid: Estimated Cost by Category
Category Estimated Cost Percentage
Demolition $35,000.00 4%
Utility Infrastructure (hydration stations &
drainage improvements) $55,000.00 6%
Earthwork $90,000.00 11%
Ground Cover (mulch & pea gravel) $115,000.00 14%
Fencing $165,000.00 19%
Flatwork (including root barrier & irrigation
sleeving) $390,000.00 46%
TOTAL $850,000.00 100%
Item 6k - Authorization to Advertise the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization Project Page 2 The tables below provide the approximate cost per category of items with Additive Alternate A and B.
Additive Alternative A: Estimated Cost by Category
Category Estimated Cost Percentage
Maintenance (3-months) $10,000.00 4%
Trees and Shrubs $41,000.00 18%
Turf Lawn $72,000.00 31%
Irrigation $107,000.00 47%
TOTAL $230,000.00 100%
Additive Alternative B: Estimated Cost by Category
Category Estimated Cost Percentage
Shade Sails (8 total) $50,000.00 100%
TOTAL $230,000.00 100%
Staff discussed splitting the Additive Alternate A into more than one alternative, but in order to construct some landscaping, there is still a need for the irrigation component which is a significant portion of the cost and needs to be installed all at once. Staff also considered an alternative with irrigation, turf lawn and the threemonth maintenance contract but determined this would not provide a significant cost savings.
Council could choose to direct staff to bid the project with what is currently in the Base Bid and Additive Alternative A as the updated base bid contract. If Council requests staff proceed with the irrigation and landscaping included in the base bid, then the following alternative recommendation could be used:
Alternative 5:
Approve authorization to advertise the project with Additive Alternative A in the Base Bid. Council may choose to direct staff to update the plans and special provisions to combine Additive Alternate A (landscaping and irrigation) with the base project bid, and separate Additive Alternate B (shade sails) as the only alternative, with a publicly disclosed funding amount of $1,130,000. Under this alternative, if bids received exceed the publicly disclosed funding limit, staff would return to Council with either a recommendation to reject all bids or a request for additional funding. As this would delay construction of the project, staff does not recommend this alternative. Currently, the Base Bid is scoped to provide the primary elements of a dog park, which would not preclude future improvements.
Item 6k - Authorization to Advertise the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization Project Page 3
2. Question: In support of competitive bids, can the contractor qualifications be reduced or public outreach increased? Could opening the project to contractors without public project experience provide more competitive bids?
As called out in the special provisions, the required contractor qualifications are listed as follows:
“You must have experience constructing projects similar to the work specified for this project. Provide three similar reference projects completed as either the prime or subcontractor. All referenced projects must have been completed within the last five years from this project’s bid opening date.
One of the three reference projects must have been completed under contract with a city, county, state or federal government agency as the prime contractor.”
The City requires one reference project to be for past experience with a government agency. This requirement has been standardized across all Capital Improvement Projects publicly bid by the City. Prior public project experience better ensures the low bid contractor is familiar with State requirements to be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations as well as prevailing wage rates and reporting requirements. Contractors without public project experience may require extensive staff time to train and familiarize with City and State contract requirements, as well more rigorous oversight during the contract to ensure their contractual obligations are met. Due to limited staffing resources and multiple ongoing construction projects, staff recommend keeping the requirement for past public project experience in order to reduce potential administrative workload.
As part of the public bid process, the City posts advertisements for public bids in the New Times. Additionally, project bids opportunities are posted to the City’s website. Contractors interested in working with the City on public projects can sign up for notifications through the website and through the City’s bid advertisement resource called BidSync. These advertisement methods have been successful in soliciting competitive bids for the City’s projects for contractors interested in working on City projects.
3. Staff discovered an error in the table on page 7 of the staff report.
The Laguna Lake Dog Park, Specification No. 2001068 funding table should be replaced with the revised table below. The table in the original report incorrectly listed the funding from the Park Improvement Fund (519-0000-32001) that is being requested to be used. Staff is requesting to appropriate the entire unreserved fund balance from the Park Improvement Fund to the project to provide an 18% contingency for construction. This request is included in the recommendations and
Item 6k - Authorization to Advertise the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization Project Page 4 fiscal impact sections of the report, as well as the proposed Resolution; however, the request for the full unreserved fund balance from the Park Improvement Fund was not reflected in the funding table. As shown in the revised funding table below, the total project construction estimate is $1,333,000 (with a full 18% contingency amount) and the total project cost estimate is $1,368,683.
4. Staff received a request to list two previous park project costs by funding source for comparison. The table below showcases financial support authorized to fund project costs.
Other Park Project Costs by Funding Sources
Cheng Park Revitalization
(~0.2 acres) (2001010)
North Broad Street Neighborhood Park
(~0.4 acres) (2091683)
Capital Outlay Fund $799,371 $318,534
Quimby Fund $0 $1,356,749
Total Construction Phase Cost $799,371 $1,675,283
Item 6k - Authorization to Advertise the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization Project Page 5 The final plans and special provisions will be updated to reflect any changes made by Council on the items included in the base bid or any alternative. Staff was notified that there is currently an error in the special provisions showing the shade structures in the base bid. Those bid items will be removed from the base bid and included in the correct alternative.
Item 6k
Department: Public Works
Cost Center: 7001
For Agenda of: 4/2/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Matt Horn, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Erica Long, Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE THE LAGUNA LAKE DOG PARK REVITALIZATION PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 2001068
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the project plans and special provisions for the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization, Specification 2001068; and
2. Authorize staff to advertise for bids; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to award the Construction Contract pursuant to Section
3.24.190 of the Municipal Code, including the Base Bid and Additive Alternates, if the lowest responsible bid is within the Publicly Disclosed funding amount of $1,130,000;
4. Authorize the City Engineer to approve Contract Change Orders up to the available project budget; and
5. Authorize the following appropriations and transfers:
a. Transfer $800,000 Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Laguna Lake Improvements account (2000057) to the project account (2001068); and, b. Appropriate $239,290 Park Improvement Funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance to the project account (2001068); and,
c. Transfer $329,393 from account 2000526 (from two funding sources identified below) to the project account (2001068); and,
i. $279,393 Capital Outlay Funds
ii. $50,000 Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds
6. Unappropriate $1,478,195 Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Laguna Lake Park Improvements project account (2000057) that will be received upon final certificate of occupancy of the multi-family units for San Luis Ranch; and
7. Authorize the Finance Director to return any unspent appropriated or transferred funding to its original account or fund, as identified in Recommendation #5; and
8. Approve a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, authorizing use of Park Improvement Funds, Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds and Capital Outlay Funds to support the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization Project, Specification Number 2001068.”
Item 6k
POLICY CONTEXT
On May 17, 2022, Council approved a Purchasing Policy Update to the Financial Management Manual that required Council approval for Public Projects that cost over $200,000.
The City’s Charter under Section 804 allows the City Council to amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by majority vote of the Council. Partial funding for this project comes from fees imposed by the Quimby Act within the Subdivision Map Act (Cal. Gov.
Code § 66477) and Chapter 16.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, which requires the fees be used for developing new or rehabilitating existing neighborhood parks, community parks, or recreation facilities that serve the subdivision paying the fees.
The recommended use of Quimby funds and Park Improvement Funds to supplement the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization project is consistent with this policy.
DISCUSSION
Background
The City’s Parks and Recreation Blueprint for the Future (General Plan and Element) is a plan to guide the development of parks, facilities, and programs in the City through 2041. The Blueprint identified dog parks as a high priority amenity within the City of San Luis Obispo. The Laguna Lake Off-Leash Dog Area is an existing park created as an offleash dog area over 25 years ago on Dalidio Drive located within Laguna Lake Park at 504 Madonna Road. The existing off-leash area is approximately three acres comprised of one large area that supports the mix of both large and small sized dogs, parking spaces, a restroom, and only a front fence that borders the off-leash dog area separating it from the parking lot and Dalidio road.
Over the past two and half decades, the current dog park area at Laguna Lake has lost over a dozen trees to disease and drought conditions. There is a lack of irrigation to sustain the trees and turf areas and only one water spicket for both dogs and owners.
The concrete pads for seating benches have settled and cracked. Due to the current uneven terrain, the majority of the acreage is either wet and swampy in winter months or dried out with severe cracks and fissures due to the clay dirt in the hotter months. The current fencing along only one side of the off-leash area and single-entry gates are no longer to standard of how dog parks are constructed and adding perimeter fencing and double gate entries will create a safe and secure formal dog park.
Project
The project scope includes removal of over a dozen tree stumps, several old and cracking concrete pads, and regrading of the area to mitigate marshy and unsafe conditions. The project will construct new safety features including a full perimeter fence around the 3- acre area with two separated dog areas for small and large sized dogs and incorporate double-gated entries into each dog area. Additional site amenities in the project include drinking fountains with dog bowls, ADA compliant concrete pathways, and additional seating areas.
Item 6k
The project plans (Attachment B) and specifications (Attachment C) are structured with a Base Bid, Additive Alternate A, and Additive Alternative B to maximize what the City can construct within the available funding. The strategy is to award the contract with the Base Bid and Additive Alternates as funding will allow, up to the Publicly Disclosed amount of $1,130,000 in compliance with Public Contract Code Section 20103.8(c). The project’s Base Bid includes removal of existing tree stumps and concrete pads, regrading the site, all fencing, wood bark mulch throughout the dog areas, concrete flatwork and pathways, and drinking fountains. The project’s Additive Alternative A would add all landscaping and irrigation needed for the fully designed project including new turf areas, trees, and shrubs in each dog section. The project’s Additive Alternative B includes shade sails in both the large and small dog areas.
Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
On June 1, 2021, Council approved the 2021-23 Financial Plan and the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation Project allocating funding for prioritized amenity upgrades. On July 6, 2021, Council approved the Parks and Recreation Blueprint for the Future: 2021-2041. In January 2023, the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) reviewed and provided direction to staff on two conceptual layouts for the Laguna Lake Dog Park. In February 2023, the PRC reviewed and provided additional direction to staff on the final conceptual layout for the Laguna Lake Dog Park.
In March 2023, the City received the 50% plans, specifications and estimate for a $2,000,000 project. City staff directed the consultant to make updates to reduce the cost of the project. In September 2023 staff presented the updated project to the PRC resulting in the PRC advising staff to fund the full project based on community feedback and as a key priority from the Blueprint.
Staff has reviewed and identified amenities and assessed the costs to be reduced by eliminating items that could be funded in a future phase, such as solar lighting. Ultimately it was decided to reduce costs by replacing pavers in the plaza with concrete flat work, eliminating extra concrete paths, eliminating solar lights, replacing the pergola with shade sails, eliminating windscreens, and eliminating the kiosk board and entrance sign. Some amenities will be reused or provided after construction including picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles, dog bag dispensers, and pet rinsing station.
Landscaping and irrigation were separated into an Additive Alternative A and shade sails into Additive Alternative B so the project can be advertised with a Base Bid and Alternates.
Staff will only award the Base Bid and Alternates as funding allows within the publicly disclosed funding limit.
Public Engagement
City staff conducted an in-person feedback session at the Laguna Lake Park in May 2022, as well as promoted an online survey in June 2022 to receive community input on the project components for the design which received over 650 responses. The results of the survey were posted on the Parks and Recreation Current Projects webpage. Conceptual layouts were presented to the PRC in January and February 2023, to gain feedback on the project design with a final presentation in September 2023 regarding the anticipated project costs.
Item 6k
CONCURRENCE
There is concurrence from the Community Development Department through the review and approval of the project for building permit issuance. This project also has concurrence from the Parks and Recreation Department as they have reviewed the project throughout the design process. There is also concurrence from the PRC of the importance of this project in supporting the community needs.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15303 Class 3 (new construction or conversion of small structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines because the project proposes negligible expansion of the existing use. This project consists of work within the existing limits of the off-leash dog area. The project consists of the construction of small structures including fencing in the off-leash dog area into a dog park with a small dog area and large dog area, adding a shade structure, hydration station, seating, and ground improvements. The project would result in a negligible expansion of the existing use. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan policies as well with applicable City Regulations. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the Community Development Department.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2023-24
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:
Park projects may be funded using different fund balances collected by the City depending on the source. Staff are requesting to utilize three different fund sources to support the Laguna Lake Dog Park project:
- General Fund-Capital Outlay Funds: Funding allocated and approved by Council for a specific project within the financial plan, such as support for the Parks and Recreation Blueprint identified projects.
- Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds: Funding collected through new development in place of developments providing identified park acreage and/or amenities. These specific funds requested to be used on this project were collected through the San Luis Ranch Development and must be spent at Laguna Lake Park. - Park Improvement Funds: Funding provided by developer for improvements to current park systems.
The dog park project was originally included under the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation account (2000526) which was created to support primary needs outlined in the 2021 adopted Blueprint. The first project staff was directed to pursue was the Laguna Lake Dog Park. The account 2001068 has been created specifically for the construction of the Laguna Lake Dog Park.
Item 6k
Staff is requesting to transfer the remaining balance of $329,323 from the 2000526 account that was planned to be used for this project. The Laguna Lake Park Improvement account 2000057 is funded by the Parkland In-Lieu (Fund 501) fees collected from the San Luis Ranch development agreement which is identified to support park improvements directly related to the adjacent Laguna Lake Park. The City’s Park Improvement Fund is funded by various city-wide developments to support community park improvements, and staff have identified these funds to support the Laguna Lake Dog Park project.
Existing Laguna Lake Park Improvements Project Allocation The Laguna Lake Improvements Project, a subproject in the Development Related Parks Improvements (Account #2000057) is funded entirely by San Luis Ranch parkland in-lieu fees. Within the 2019-21 Financial Plan and in anticipation to support the forecasted adoption of the new Parks and Recreation Blueprint priorities, Council appropriated $300,000 of Parkland in-lieu (Quimby) Funds to enhance Laguna Lake Park. Within the 2021-23 Financial Plan, Council appropriated an additional $2,875,026 to the Laguna Lake Improvements project.
The combined total allocation amount of $3,175,026 aligns with the maximum parkland in-lieu fees forecasted for both single family and multi-family units outlined in the development agreement for San Luis Ranch. However, at the time of this report, only $1,696,831 has been collected in parkland in-lieu fees for the single-family units within the San Luis Ranch development. Staff is recommending that $1,478,195 be unappropriated from the Laguna Lake Park Improvement Project (2000057) since the total anticipated funds have not been fully collected. The City will receive the balance of the full projected amount of parkland in-lieu fees from San Luis Ranch upon final certificate of occupancy of the multi-family units.
It is proposed to transfer $800,000 from the collected San Luis Ranch development fees in Laguna Lake Improvements account 2000057 to the Laguna Lake Dog Project account 2001068 which can only be used at Laguna Lake Park. The remaining $896,831 of the $1,696,831 San Luis Ranch development fees collected to date are planned to fund future park amenity enhancements at the Laguna Lake Park. The table below provides a summary of accounting for the Laguna Lake Park Improvement Project (2000057):
Laguna Lake Park Improvements Project (2000057)
Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds
FY2019-21 $300,000
FY2021-23 $2,875,026
Uncollected Fees (unappropriate) -$1,478,195
Transfer to Laguna Lake Dog Park -$800,000
New Balance $896,831
Project Funding Sources
On July 18, 2023, Council approved the transfer of $750,000 Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation project (2000526) to award construction of the North Board Street Park Project. At that time, the $800,000 from the 2023-25 Financial Plan was intended to support the Laguna Lake Dog Park
Item 6k
project which was still under design review and not anticipated to go to Council for several months. As these funds were able to be utilized in support of city-wide park projects, staff utilized $750,000 from that fund to support the North Broad Street Neighborhood Park project. Staff were in agreement as sufficient project replacement funds for the dog park project were identified within the San Luis Ranch Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds Balance (2000057) which are eligible to be utilized for park projects associated specifically at Laguna Lake Park. The balance of the initial Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds resulted in $50,000 remaining in the account which staff are requesting to transfer to the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization project (2001068).
Staff is recommending funding the Laguna Lake Dog Park Project account (2001068) through the following transfers and appropriations:
Transfer $800,000 from Parkland In-Lieu Fund from account (2000057-01) Transfer $329,393 from account 2000526 ($50,000 are Capital Outlay Funds and $279,393 are Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds)
Appropriate $239,290 from Park Improvement Fund Unreserved Fund Balance which currently has a balance of $239,290.
Funding Sources
Total
Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund: Capital Outlay
Fund Account 2000526
$279,393 $279,393 $0 N/A
Other: Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby)
Fund (501): Account 2000526
$0 $50,000 $0 N/A
*Other: Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby)
Fund (501): Account 2000057
$1,696,831 $800,000 $896,831 N/A
Other: Park Improvement
Fund (519): Available Balance
$239,290 $239,290 $0 N/A
Total $2,265,514 $1,368,683 $896,831 N/A
*These funds can only be spent at Laguna Lake Park as required by the San Luis Ranch Impact Fees
Item 6k
Laguna Lake Dog Park, Specification No. 2001068
Capital Outlay
Funds
Parkland InLieu (Quimby)
Funds
Parkland In-Lieu
(Quimby) Funds
Park
Improvement
Funds
Project
Total
Costs
Parks and Rec
General Plan
Implementation
Account
(2000526)
Parks and Rec
General Plan
Implementation
Account
(2000526)
Development
Related Parks
Improvement -
Laguna Lake
Improvements:
Account (2000057-
01)
Unreserved
Fund
Balance
Base Engineer Estimate $279,393 $50,000 $520,607 $0 $850,000 Additive Alternative A $0 $0 $196,000 $34,000 $230,000
Additive Alternative B $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
Total $279,393 $50,000 $766,607 $34,000 $1,130,000
Contingencies (18%) $0 $0 $33,393 $39,607 $73,000
Total Construction
Estimate $279,393 $50,000 $800,000 $73,607 $1,203,000
Materials Testing: $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
Construction Consultant
Support $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000
Printing: $0 $0 $0 $1,683 $1,683
Total Project Estimate $279,393 $50,000 $800,000 $109,290 $1,238,683 Current Available
Balance: $279,393 $50,000 $1,696,831 $239,290 $2,265,514 New Requested Funding $279,393 $50,000 $800,000 $109,290 $1,238,683 Funds Remaining $0 $0 $896,831 $130,000 $1,026,831
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve authorization to advertise the project with a reduced publicly disclosed funding amount. The City Council may choose to approve the project and authorize the project advertisement with a publicly disclosed funding amount of $1,000,000. This would reduce the $239,290 appropriation from the Park Improvement Funds to $89,290 and will leave $150,000 in the Park Improvement Funds for other city-wide park projects. Staff does not recommend this alternative because the lower funding limit will reduce the park amenities that can be constructed with this project.
2. Approve authorization to advertise the project and require staff to only use funding dedicated to Laguna Lake Park from the San Luis Ranch Development. The City Council may choose to approve the project and authorize the project advertisement with a publicly disclosed funding amount of $1,130,000 but only use funds from the Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds (Project 2000057) from the San Luis Ranch Development Agreement. This would eliminate the requested appropriation from the Park Improvement Funds and eliminate the transfer request from Account 2000526 in order to spend this funding on other city-wide park projects.
Staff does not recommend this alternative as it limits the future improvements that can
Item 6k
be made within Laguna Lake Park with the fees collected from the San Luis Ranch Development.
3. Direct Staff to work with the Parks and Recreation Commission. Council could direct staff to work with Staff to reduce the scope of the project or defer certain amenities to future phases. Council should identify any specific amenities or elements of the project that might be deferred or identified for potential fundraising.
4. Deny or defer authorization to advertise the project. The City Council may choose not to authorize project advertisement. Staff does not recommend this alternative as the Parks and Recreation Blueprint for the Future: 2021-2041 (General Plan and Element) highlighted the Laguna Lake Off-Leash Dog Area in the Near-Term improvements as needing fencing, shade, and ground treatment.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution authorizing use of Park Improvement Funds, Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds, Capital Outlay Funds to support Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization (Spec. No. 2001068)
B - Project Plans (Spec. No. 2001068)
C - Project Special Provisions (Spec. No. 2001068)
D - Current photo examples of Laguna Lake Off-Leash Dog Area
R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2024 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING USE OF PARK IMPROVEMENT
FUNDS, PARKLAND IN-LIEU (QUIMBY) FUNDS AND CAPITAL
OUTLAY FUNDS TO SUPPORT THE LAGUNA LAKE DOG PARK
REVITALIZATION PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NUMBER 2001068
WHEREAS, in June of 2021, the City Council approved the 2021-23 Financial Plan – Capital Improvement Plan, which identified the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation project (2000526) with a total budget of $400,000 of Capital Outlay Funds; and
WHEREAS, in July of 2021, the City Council approved the Parks and Recreation Blueprint for the Future: 2021-2041, which identified dog parks as a near-term priority; and
WHEREAS, in June of 2023, the City Council approved the 2023-25 Financial Plan – Capital Improvement Plan, which identified the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation project (2000526) with an additional $800,000 of Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds; and
WHEREAS, in July of 2023, the City Council approved the transfer of $750,000 of Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation project (2000526) to support construction of the North Broad Street Neighborhood Park; and
WHEREAS, to represent available and collected funds, staff is recommending the City Council unappropriate $1,478,195 Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Laguna Lake Park Improvements project (2000057) due to the fees not being collected yet; and WHEREAS, to provide funding to support the total construction contract for the Project, staff is recommending the City Council approve the transfer of $800,000 Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Laguna Lake Improvements account (2000057) to the project account (2001068); and
WHEREAS, to provide funding to support the total construction contract for the Project, staff is recommending the City Council approve the transfer of the remaining account balance of $279,393 Capital Outlay Funds from the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation project (2000526) to the project account (2001068); and
Resolution No. _____ (2024 Series) Page 2
R ______
WHEREAS, to provide funding to support the total construction contract for the Project, staff is recommending the City Council approve the transfer of the remaining account balance of $50,000 Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation project (2000526) to the project account (2001068); and
WHEREAS, to provide funding to support the total construction contract for the Project, staff is recommending the City Council appropriate and approve the use of $239,290 Park Improvement Funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance to the project account (2001068); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
Resolution No. _____ (2024 Series) Page 3
R ______
SECTION 1. The City Council authorizes unappropriating $1,478,195 Parkland InLieu (Quimby) Funds from the Laguna Lake Park Improvements (2000057); and City Council approves the transfers of $800,000 in Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Laguna Lake Park Improvements (2000057), $279,393 in Capital Outlay Funds from the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation (2000526), and $50,000 in Parkland In-Lieu (Quimby) Funds from the Parks and Recreation General Plan Implementation (2000526) to the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization Project; and City Council appropriates and approves the use of $239,290 Park Improvement Funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance to the Laguna Lake Dog Park Revitalization Project.
Upon motion of _______________________, seconded by
_______________________, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _____________________ 2024. ___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
__________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ___________________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington, City Clerk
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/
/
/
••
••
••
•• ••
•• •• ••
••
•• ••
•• •• ••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
13 13
15 19
70 19
•• ••
13 •• •• •• ••
••
12/21/2023
C-1.0 31
APPROVED BY
SPECIFICATION NO.
FILE NO./LOCATIONDATE
OF
SHEET
Reference Documents:
City Standard Specifications - August 2020 EditionCity Engineering Standards - August 2020 Edition APPLICABLE CODES:
CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS - 2022CBC - 2022 California Building CodeCPC - 2022 California Plumbing CodeGBC - 2022 Green Building CodeCFC - 2022 California Fire Code
1. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR OR PERMITTEE TO CONTACT "UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA" BY PHONE AT 8-1-1 TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTIONFOR LOCATION OF POWER, TELEPHONE, OIL AND NATURAL GASUNDERGROUND FACILITIES. CONTRACTOR OR PERMITEE SHALL ALSO CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY FOR THE LOCATION OF CABLE T.V., WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POSSESS A CLASS "A" LICENSE AT THE TIME OF THE BID OPENING.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ALL UTILITY CONFLICTS AND SHALL
POTHOLE AND LOCATE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, UTILITY LOCATION, DEPTH,
SIZE AND MATERIAL SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER, AS REQUIRED
BY THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS
4. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED
DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION AND GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES PER CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO STANDARDS.
5. SEE APPENDIX [B] OF THE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT "LAGUNA LAKE DOG PARK
IMPROVEMENTS, 504 MADONNA ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA" PREPARED ON AUGUST 4, 2023 FOR THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO index to plans
Brian Nelson R.C.E. C 79870
City Engineer
general notes:
datum:
CONSULTANT NAME:
LAGUNA LAKE
DOG PARK
5(9,7$/,=$7,21
504 MADONNA ROAD
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTwww.wallacegroup.usMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURESURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCESPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONPLANNINGCIVIL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ••
1. SEE SHEET SC-1 FOR SURVEY DATUM INFORMATION.
200
Scale: NTS
DOG PARK LOCATION MAP
ENGINEER OF RECORD:
scope of work:
WORK FOR THIS PLAYGROUND RENOVATION PROJECT INCLUDES:
1. REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING FENCE AND CMU WALLS, EXISTING LOG BARRIERS,
EXISTING CONCRETE, EXISTING BENCHES, AND EXISTING NON-ADA COMPLIANT PATH OF TRAVEL.
2. INSTALLATION OF NEW SIDEWALK, RECREATION AREAS, SHADE EQUIPMENT, PAVERS,
PICNIC TABLES, BENCHES, FENCING, ADA PATH OF TRAVEL, ADA COMPLIANT RAMP, AND WATER FOUNTAINS.
E
(SIGNATURE)
ANN SEVER
F
ST O E AT
AL I F C
R S REG I ET LIC. #4038
LAN
ED DSCAP
RN O I A
ECT
CH AR TI
Sheet List Table
DALIDIO DRIVE
deferred submittals:
1. SHADE STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL DESIGN. SEE SPECIAL
PROVISIONS, SECTION 5-1.23B(3)
2. SWPPP
SCALE: NTS
FILE NAME: 061-118 NOTE.DWG
GENERAL NOTES
1. THESE PLANS ARE PART OF A SET OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED THE SOLE SOURCE OF CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION.
ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND CALTRANS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND WORK SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE COPIES OF THE APPROVED CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BEFAMILIAR WITH ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
3. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE OR SHE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND
COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE JOB SITE DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THISREQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY,AND HOLD THE ENGINEER AND OWNER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL
LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF
WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE
NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR ENGINEER, OR THIRD PARTY IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OR IN TRESPASS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRACTICE SAFETY AT
ALL TIMES AND SHALL FURNISH, ERECT, AND MAINTAIN, SUCH FENCES, BARRICADES, LIGHTS, AND SIGNS NECESSARY TO GIVE ADEQUATEPROTECTION TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES.
4. INFORMATION PERTAINING TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES IS BASED ON RECORD INFORMATION AND IS SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONPURPOSES ONLY. UNDERGROUND FEATURES SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW ON THEPLANS ARE INDICATED WITH THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT, AND MAY NOT APPEAR IN PROFILE OR SECTION VIEWS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL AGENCIES INVOLVED ANDSHALL LOCATE ALL FACILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION IN ANY AREA. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA), TOLL FREE AT 811 AND THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUALLY REVIEW JOB SITE CONDITIONS.
CONDITIONS REQUIRING CONSTRUCTION DIFFERENT FROM THAT SHOWN ON
THE PLANS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE AFFECTED CONSTRUCTION.
6. THESE DRAWINGS REPRESENT THE FINISHED CONDITION AND UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED, THEY DO NOT SHOW THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION.
7. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN OR INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND/OR INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR ON THISPROJECT, UNLESS THEY ARE CALLED OUT AS: "EXISTING", "FUTURE", "NIC", NOT A PART; OR HAVE SOME OTHER EXCLUDING NOTATION.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A SET OF PROJECT DRAWINGS ON WHICH
RECORD INFORMATION SHALL BE PLACED NOTING DEVIATIONS FROM THEPLANS IN THE LOCATION, GRADE, SIZE, TYPE, AND SCOPE OF WORK WHICH IS CONSTRUCTED.
9. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) REQUIREMENTS ANDSTANDARDS SHALL BE OBSERVED AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES.
10. EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE OR
SHALL BE TIED OUT BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE. PROPER RESETTING OF ALL EXISTING MONUMENTS AND OTHER SURVEY MARKERS SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OWN EXPENSE.
ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
REPLACED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY BY A PROFESSIONAL LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8771 OF THE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS ACT.
11. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN COMPLETE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL
RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT, TITLED LAGUNA LAKE DOG PARK IMPROVEMENTS 504 MADONNA ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA DATED AUGUST 4, 2023.
12. NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STARTED WITHOUT PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO STARTING OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY CONSTRUCTION DONE WITHOUT APPROVED PLANS OR PRIOR NOTIFICATION TO THE CITY WILL BE REJECTEDAND WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK.
13. SOILS TESTS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ALL TESTS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PLACING OF MATERIAL. THE TEST RESULTS SHALL CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION AND SOURCE OF THE MATERIAL.
14. COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE MADE ON SUBGRADE MATERIAL AND MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND CITY STANDARDS. SAID TESTS SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO THE PLACING OF THE NEXT MATERIAL.
COMPACTION REPORTS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.
15. SITE SOILS WITHIN FLATWORK AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED AS RECOMMENDED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT "LAGUNA LAKE DOG PARK IMPROVEMENTS, 504 MADONNA ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA". THE
EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL THEN BE SCARIFIED, MOISTURE CONDITIONED, AND RECOMPACTED.
16. ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
17. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON-SITE SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7:00AM TO 4:00PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS.
18. DESIGNS OF ALL FOUNDATIONS, ROADWAYS, CURBS, AND OTHER
STRUCTURES SHALL BE REVIEWED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO
ENSURE THAT THEY ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SOILS PROPERTIES AND CONDITIONS ON THE PROJECT SITE.
19. ALL WORK LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE CITY UTILITIES AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE ENGINEERINGSTANDARD AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (ADOPTED AUGUST 2020).
20. PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PARKING AND DRIVEWAY STANDARDS AND CITY ENGINEERING STANDARD #2250.
21. ALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DESIGNED AT LESSTHAN 2% FINAL GRADIENTS CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INVESTIGATE THE SITE DURING CLEARING,
DEMOLITION AND EARTHWORK OPERATION FOR ANY EXISTING HAZARD SUCH
AS CESSPOOLS, CISTERNS, FOUNDATIONS OR LARGE DEPOSITS OF ORGANIC MATERIAL, ETC. IF ANY SUCH HAZARDS ARE FOUND, THE OWNER ANDENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED. ALL EXISTING SURFACE STRUCTURES, FENCES, TANKS, PIPES, ETC., AND ANY BURIED MATERIAL SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS FOR REMOVAL FROM THE SITE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A LICENSED DISPOSALFACILITY.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MIN. OF 48 HOURS WRITTEN NOTICE TOTHE PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE AND SURVEYOR WHEN REQUESTING SURVEY STAKES.3. ANY SECTIONS OF DAMAGED OR DISPLACED CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK,OR DRIVEWAY APPROACH SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THESATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. NEW CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, UTILITY
ABANDONMENTS, AND NEW UTILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST CITY ENGINEERING STANDARDS..
4. A COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM A LICENSED SOILS
ENGINEER STATING THAT THE BASE AND SUBGRADE WERE PREPARED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SOILS REPORT OR THE CITY PARKING AND DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. PER THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'SRECOMMENDATION, NON-VEHICULAR AREAS SHALL BE 90% COMPACTION AND VEHICULAR AREAS SHALL BE 95% COMPACTION.
5. A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL CERTIFY SEWER LATERALS WITH ASLOPE NOT LESS THAN 1 8" PER FOOT OR 1% AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.
SURVEYORS FIELD REPORT SHALL INCLUDE SPOT ELEVATIONS VERIFIED AT NOT LESS THAN 10' INTERVALS AND PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AT OR BEFORE THE SEWER LATERAL INSPECTION.
6. THE ELEVATION OF THE FOUNDATION FORMS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A
LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVEDBUILDING PLANS AND CITY ORDINANCES PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION
APPROVALS
CUT: 2,500 CU, YDS.
FILL: 550 CU, YDS.NET: 1,950 CU, YDS.
QUANTITY ESTIMATES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO BE USED FOR BONDING AND PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL QUANTITIES FOR THE PURPOSES OFCONSTRUCTION & BIDDING. THESE QUANTITIES DO NOT ASSUME ANY LOSSES DUE TO SHRINKAGE, DIRT REMOVAL DUE TO UNSUITABLE SUBGRADEMATERIAL OR REUSE OF EXISTING ASPHALT ON-SITE.
GRADING NOTES
1. IF EXCAVATIONS ENCOUNTER SIGNIFICANT PALEONTOLOGICAL
RESOURCES, ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES, OR CULTURAL MATERIAL, THEN
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT MAY AFFECT THEM SHALL CEASE UNTIL THE EXTENT OF THE RESOURCE IS DETERMINED AND THE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR APPROVES APPROPRIATE PROTECTIVE MEASURES.
THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF THE
EXTENT AND LOCATION OF DISCOVERED MATERIALS SO THAT A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST MAY RECORD THEM.
2. IF PRE-HISTORIC NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS ARE ENCOUNTERED, A
NATIVE AMERICAN MONITOR SHOULD BE CALLED INTO WORK WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGIST TO DOCUMENT AND REMOVE THE ITEMS. DISPOSITION OFARTIFACTS SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS.APPLICABLE CODES:
CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS - 2022CBC - 2022 California Building CodeCPC - 2022 California Plumbing Code GBC - 2022 Green Building Code
CFC - 2022 California Fire Code
SWPPP AND EROSION CONTROL
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE SWPPP AND OBTAIN WDID NUMBER FOR PROJECT. SWPPP SHALL BE A PART OF THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
2. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FOR WIND, WATER, MATERIAL
STOCKPILES, AND TRACKING SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ON ALL PROJECTS AT
ALL TIMES AND SHALL INCLUDE SOURCE CONTROL, INCLUDING PROTECTION
OF STOCKPILES, PROTECTION OF SLOPES, PROTECTION OF ALL DISTURBED
AREAS, PROTECTION OF ACCESSES, AND PERIMETER CONTAINMENT MEASURES. EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING AND SITE DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES UNLESS
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DETERMINES TEMPORARY MEASURES TO
BE UNNECESSARY BASED UPON LOCATION, SITE CHARACTERISTICS OR TIME OF YEAR. THE INTENT OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE TO KEEP
ALL GENERATED SEDIMENTS FROM ENTERING A SWALE, DRAINAGE WAY,WATERCOURSE, ATMOSPHERE, OR MIGRATE ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.3. SITE INSPECTIONS AND APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES/DEVICES SHALL BE CONDUCTED AND DOCUMENTED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND ESPECIALLY PRIOR TO, DURING, ANDAFTER RAIN EVENTS.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PLACEMENT AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES/DEVICES AS SPECIFIEDBY THE APPROVED PLAN UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE PROJECT IS ACCEPTED
AS COMPLETE BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OR UNTIL RELEASED FROM THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF THEIR GENERAL PERMIT. EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES/DEVICES MAY BE RELOCATED, DELETED OR ADDITIONAL
MEASURES/DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DEPENDING ON THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONAL EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES/DEVICES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE
ENGINEER OF WORK, CITY INSPECTOR, SWPPP MONITOR, OR RWQCB INSPECTOR. GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS WITH ADDITIONALMEASURES/DEVICES NOTED FROM THE APPENDIX OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS.
5. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE THE FIRST ORDER OF WORK ANDSHALL BE IN PLACE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONAL
MEASURES /DEVICES SHALL BE AVAILABLE DURING THE RAINY SEASON (BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15) OR ANYTIME WHEN THE RAIN PROABALITY EXCEEDS 30%. THESE MEASURES/DEVICES SHALL BE AVAILABLE,
INSTALLED, AND/OR APPLIED AFTER EACH AREA IS GRADED AND NO LATER THAN FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF EACH AREA.
6. THE CONTRACTOR AND QSP SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REVIEW THE PROJECT SITE PRIOR TO OCTOBER 15 (RAINY SEASON) AND TO COORDINATE AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR WET WEATHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES.A LOCALLY BASED STANDBY CREW FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BEAVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEASON (OCTOBER 15 THROUGHAPRIL 15). NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AND STOCK PILED AT
CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OR MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY DEVICES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT.
7. PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED AND ESTABLISHED WITH 70% COVERAGE ON ALL DISTURBED SURFACES OTHER THAN PAVED OR GRAVEL SURFACES, PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE FULLY ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES ARE ESTABLISHED.
8. EFFECTIVE SOIL COVER SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED FOR AREAS SCHEDULED TO BE INACTIVE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS AND ALL FINISHED SLOPES, OPEN SPACE, UTILITY BACKFILL, AND COMPLETED LOTS.9. THE USE OF PLASTIC MATERIALS SHALL BE LIMITED WHEN ALTERNATIVES EXIST.
10. EFFECTIVE WIND EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED.11. AFTER EACH RAIN STORM, REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS FROM EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING BASINS, SEDIMENT BASINS,SEDIMENT TRAPS, AND DIVERSION EARTH SWALES.
12. ALL EQUIPMENT/ VEHICLES SHALL BE FUELED, MAINTAINED AND STORED IN THE DESIGNATED STAGING AREA FITTED WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS.
13. STORAGE AREAS FOR MATERIALS, WASTE, WATER STORAGE, WATER
TRANSFER FOR DUST CONTROL AND COMPACTION PRACTICES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED STAGING AREAS.
14. STOCKPILED CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS NOT BEING ACTIVELY USED SHALL BE COVERED AND BERMED PRIOR TO QUALIFYING RAIN EVENT.
15. TRACKING ONTO THE PUBLIC STREET SHALL BE MINIMIZED. THE
ADJOINING STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED BY SWEEPING TO REMOVE DIRT, DUST, MUD AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH DAY.
16. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS, PLANTINGS, AND FACILITIES ARE IN PLACE.
TEMPORARY MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
17. MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED/EXPOSED AREA WHERE POSSIBLE.
DISTURB ONLY AREAS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN IN THESE PLANS.
18. ALL PREVENTION AND CLEAN UP MEASURES SHOULD BE CONDUCTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ORDINANCES, AS WELL AS STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSEDOF IN A LEGAL MANNER.
19. ALL DISCHARGES OF STORM WATER MUST COMPLY WITH THE LAWFUL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND OTHER LOCAL
AGENCIES REGARDING THE DISCHARGES OF STORM WATER TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS.
20. THIS PLAN DOES NOT COVER THE REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC WASTE. IN THE EVENT OF A DISCHARGE OR RELEASE OF A REPORTABLE
QUANTITY OF TOXIC WASTE, CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE STOPPED
UNTIL THE SPILL CAN BE ASSESSED AND A MITIGATION REPORT PREPARED BY
A QUALIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT, AND IF NECESSARY, REVIEWED
BY THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND ANY OTHER AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION.
AIR QUALITY MITIGATION NOTES
THE FOLLOWING DUST MITIGATION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED AT THE START
AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR GRADING ACTIVITY:
1. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE SPEED AT THE WORK SITE MUST BE LIMITED TO FIFTEEN (15) MILES PER HOUR OR LESS;
2. PRIOR TO ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE, SUFFICIENT WATER MUST BE
APPLIED TO THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED TO PREVENT VISIBLE EMISSIONS FROM CROSSING THE PROPERTY LINE;
3. AREAS TO BE GRADED OR EXCAVATED MUST BE KEPT ADEQUATELY
WETTED TO PREVENT VISIBLE EMISSIONS FROM CROSSING THE PROPERTY LINE;
4. STORAGE PILES MUST BE KEPT ADEQUATELY WETTED, TREATED WITH A
CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT, OR COVERED WHEN MATERIAL IS NOT BEING ADDED TO OR REMOVED FROM THE PILE;
5. EQUIPMENT MUST BE WASHED DOWN BEFORE MOVING FROM THE PROPERTY ONTO A PAVED PUBLIC ROAD;
6. VISIBLE TRACK-OUT ON THE PAVED PUBLIC ROAD MUST BE CLEANED
USING WET SWEEPING OR HEPA FILTER EQUIPPED VACUUM DEVICE AT THEEND IF EACH DAY,
7. NO PERSON SHALL ENGAGE IN ANY CONSTRUCTION OR GRADINGOPERATION ON PROPERTY WHERE THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED IS GREATER THAN ONE (1.0) ACRE UNLESS A GEOLOGIC EVALUATION HAS OCCURRED ON SITE. IF ASBESTOS CONTAINING ROCK IS DETERMINED TO BE ON SITE AN
ASBESTOS DUST MITIGATION PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TOAND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFORE THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OR GRADING ACTIVITY; AND THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DUST MITIGATION PLAN
MUST BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE BEGINNING AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR GRADING ACTIVITY; AND
8. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE REQUIRED TO INFORMCONSTRUCTION CREW OF SITE REQUIREMENTS.9. ALL MATERIAL EXCAVATED OR GRADED SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY WATERED TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF DUST. DURING THE TIME
PERIOD IN WHICH GRADING WILL OCCUR, WATERING SHALL OCCUR USINGNONPOTABLE WATER, OR OTHERWISE AS NEEDED TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
CITY INSPECTOR, AT LEAST TWICE DAILY INCLUDING WEEKENDS WITHCOMPLETE COVERAGE, PREFERABLY IN THE LATE MORNING AND AFTER WORK IS FINISHED FOR THE DAY.
10. ALL CLEARING, GRADING EARTH-MOVING, OR EXCAVATING ACTIVITIES SHALL CEASE DURING PERIODS OF HIGH WINDS (GREATER THAN 15MPH AVERAGED OVER ONE HOUR) TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF DUST.
11. IF SOIL MATERIALS ARE TRANSPORTED OFF-SITE, TRUCKS SHALL BE
COVERED OR HAVE ALT LEAST TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD TO MINIMIZE DUST AND PREVENT LOOSE SOIL FROM SPILLING OUT.
12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO REVEGETATION SHALL BE
STABILIZED USING APPROVED LANDSCAPED PLANTING, CHEMICAL SOIL BINDERS, JUTE NETTING OR OTHER METHODS APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THEENGINEER OF RECORD.
TREE PROTECTION NOTES
1. PROTECTION FENCES
INSTALL A 5-FOOT TALL FENCE AROUND DRIP-LINE OF TREES TO BE SAVED, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, BEFORE ANY WORK STARTS ON THE SITE.
THE TREE PROTECTION FENCE MUST BE ORANGE SAFETY FENCING SECURED WITH STEEL T-POSTS SET AT 8 FEET ON CENTER.
TREE PROTECTION FENCES MUST:
1. BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS
2. REMAIN IN PLACE
3. CONTINUALLY MAINTAINED
4. REMOVED AS THE LAST ITEM OF CONTRACT WORK
2. PRUNING
PRUNING OF TREE LIMBS WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED IF APPROVED BY THEENGINEER. TREE PRUNIN MUST BE DONE BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST PER INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) STANDARDS.
3. PARKING AND STORAGE OF BUILDING MATERIALS
DO NOT:
1. PARK VEHICLES
2. PARK CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
3. STOCKPILE
WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE OF TREES TO BE SAVED.4. DUMPING
DO NOT DEPOSIT:
1. WATER
2. WASTE
3. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
WITHIN 20 FEET OF DRIP-LINE OF TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. HERBICIDE USE
DO NOT USE HERBICIDE INCLUDING PRE AND POST EMERGENT WITHIN 20 FEET OF DRIP-LINE OF TREES TO BE SAVED6. TRUNK PROTECTION
DO NOT ATTACH ANYTHING TO ANY PORTION OF TREES TO BE SAVED. IF YOU
WOUND A TREE TO BE SAVED, IMMEDIATELY EXPAND TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING AND TREAT TREE WOUND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.
IF SEVERE TREE DAMAGE OCCURS YOU MAY BE FINED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S TREE ORDINANCE.
7. EXCAVATION, GRADING, TRENCHING AND BORING
NO TRENCHING OF ANY DEPTH WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE OF TREES OR SHRUBS TO BE SAVED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. IF YOU PLAN TO TRENCH WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE DRIP0LINE OF TREE TO BE
SAVED, LAYOUT TRENCH LOCATION WITH CHALK OR PAINT, AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE TRENCHING WORK BEGINS. IF
THE ENGINEER APPROVES TRENCHING WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE OF TREES OR SHRUBS TO BE SAVED, TRENCHING EXCAVATION MUST BE DONE BY HAND.
TRENCHING OUTSIDE THE DRIP-LINE OF TREES TO BE SAVED AND WITHIN 20
FEET OF DRIP-LINE OF TREES TO BE SAVED IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED BY HAND.
NO GRADING CUTS OR FILLS WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE OF TREES TO BE SAVED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
DURING EXCAVATION IF ANY ROOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED LESS THAN 1-INCH INDIAMETER, THE ROOT MAY BE CUT BY HAND LEAVING A CLEAN CUT.DURING EXCAVATION IF ANY ROOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED GREATER THAN 1-INCH IN DIAMTER, THE ROOT MUST BE PROTECTED FROM:1. SCARRING
2. DRYING
3. THEN TUNNELED UNDER
IF THE ROOT CANNOT BE PROTECTED, YOU MUST SCHEDULE THE ENGINEER AND CITY ARBORIST TO REVIEW EXCAVATION AND GIVE DIRECTION.
SHADE ROOTS FROM DIRECT SUNLIGHT WHEN EXPOSED IN OPEN TRENCH.
THE ENGINEER MUST REVIEW PRUNED OR CUT ROOTS PRIOR TO BACKFILLINGTRENCH. TRENCH MUST BE BACKFILLED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ENCOUNTERING ROOTS.
ALL DIRECTIONAL BORING WITHIN DRIP-LINE TREES TO BE SAVED MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 5 FEET.
IF SEVERE TREE OR ROOT DAMAGE OCCURS YOU MAY BE FINED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S TREE ORDINANCE.8. TREE REMOVALS
TREES NOT SHOWN AND IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE REMOVED, BUT ARE
REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE WORK, ARE SUBJECT TO THE CITY'S TREE REMOVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.COORDINATE TREE REMOVAL POLICY COMPLIANCE WITH ENGINEER.
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
LEGEND
/ / / / / / EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ABANDON UTILITY
UNDERGROUND CABLE
TELEVISION LINE
CTV CTV
UNDERGROUND ELECTRICALLINE
ELE ELEGAS GAS UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
UNDERGROUND
TELECOMMUNITCATIONS LINE TCOM TCOM
UTL UTL UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINE
SS SS GRAVITY SEWER LINESD SD STORM DRAINWL WL WATER LINE
RIGHT OF WAYEASEMENT
CENTERLINE
X (BW) BARBED WIRE FENCE
X (CL) CHAIN LINK FENCE
WOOD FENCE •• ••
EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION
SD SD
SS
CO
SS
SD SD
SS SS
SLOPESPOT ELEVATIONSSEWER CLEANOUTSEWER MANHOLE
CO
SEWER LATERAL
0.50% 2:1
FG= 225.45 EG= 225.45
0.50% 2:1
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER SERVICEWATER SERVICE MANIFOLD
STORM DRAIN MANHOLESTORM DRAIN CURB INLETSTORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN
SD SD STORM DRAIN
SSFM SSFM SEWER FORCE MAIN
IRR EXISTING IRRIGATION LINE
•• ••
100
101
102
103
104
SURVEY CONTROL POINTS
PT. NO.
100
101
102103
104
NORTHING
2293553.062293502.832293588.592293206.522293001.46
EASTING
5760917.495760875.265760762.905761126.065760930.42
ELEV.
146.88144.56143.40148.30139.47
DESC.
SET 5/8 REBAR 'WG CONTROL'SET 5/8 REBAR 'WG CONTROL'
SET MAG NAIL IN PAINT STRIPE
SET MAG NAIL 'WG CONTROL'SET MAG NAIL 'WG CONTORL'
SHEET LAYOUT AND SURVEY CONTROL
VICINITY MAP
SURVEY NOTES
1. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983, 1992 ADJUSTMENT [NAD83(1992)], EPOCH DATE OF 1991.35 ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK, JANUARY 2007 REVISION.
2. THE PROJECTION USED IS THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (CCS83), ZONE 5 PROJECTION ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO'S HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK, JANUARY 2007REVISION.
3. THIS SURVEY TIED TO TWO CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINT STATIONS. THOSE STATIONS ARE DESIGNATED "8118", HAVING A PUBLISHED POSITION OF: NORTHING 2291824.331', EASTING 5759987.692'; AND "8120", HAVING A PUBLISHED POSITION OF: NORTHING2292760.657', EASTING 5759556.922'. THE RECORD BEARING FROM •• • • • ••• • ••• • • • ••• • •• • ••• • • • • •• • ••• • ••• • ••• • • • •••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • HE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO CCS83, ZONE 5 GRID NORTH
ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO'S HORIZONTAL
CONTROL NETWORK, JANUARY 2007 REVISION.
4. ALL MEASUREMENTS LISTED, SHOWN AND REPRESENTED HEREON ARE
BASED ON GRID DISTANCES OF THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 5 PROJECTION ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF SAN LUISOBISPO'S HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK, JANUARY 2007 REVISION.
THE COMBINED SCALE FACTOR FOR THE PROJECT IS 0.999961444 THIS SCALE FACTOR WAS CALCULATED USING AN ELEVATION OF 130.53 FEET FOR PT. NO. 106 (CITY VERTICAL BM# 327). DIVIDE THE DISTANCES HEREON BY THE COMBINED SCALE FACTOR TO OBTAIN GROUNDDISTANCES. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET.
5. THE CONVERGENCE ANGLE IS: •• ••• • ••• • •• • ••••••••••••••••• AT PT. NO. 327.6. THE ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS (ELEVATIONS) ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BENCH MARK SYSTEM, JANUARY 2007 REVISION. THIS SURVEY TIED TO THE POINT DESIGNATED AS PT. NO 327 OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BENCH MARK SYSTEM, JANUARY 2007 REVISION, HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION OF 130.53'.
7. THE CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT.
8. ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY PRODUCED BY WALLACE GROUP.
PHOTOGRAPHY DATED: 10/28/2022
9. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE PLOTTED BASED ON ABOVE GROUND PAINT MARKS BY OTHERS, ABOVE GROUND SURFACESTRUCTURES. ACTUAL LOCATION MAY DIFFER. ADDITIONAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES MAY EXIST. FOR INFORMATIONREGARDING UTILITY LOCATION, SIZE, DEPTH, CONDITION, AND CAPACITY CONTACT UTILITY OR MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITY.
10. UNDERGROUND PIPE SIZES ARE BASED ON VISUAL OBSERVATIONS MADE FROM THE SURFACE AND ARE APPROXIMATE.
11. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. NO BOUNDARY LINES ARE DEPICTED AND NO BOUNDARY EVIDENCE WAS REVIEWED. NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.
SHEET SC-2SHEET SC-3
DALIDIO DR.
No. 9688
N.T.S.
MADONNA RD
LOS OSOS VALLEY RD
LAGUNA
LAKE
DALIDIO RD
LAGUNA LAKE
DOG PARK
FILE NAME: 061-118 SRVY.DWG
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
12/21/2023
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
// / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
GATE
TRASH CAN
TRASH CAN
36" MULTI -
TRUNK CYP
9" REDWOOD
4" CYP
4" CYP
4" CYP
4" CYP
9" CYP
8" STUMP
12" STUMP
12" STUMP
12" STUMP
18" STUMP
PLANT
PROTECTION
SILT FENCE
PLANT
PROTECTION
SILT FENCE
WOOD BRIDGE
BIKE RACK
TRASH CAN
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/
//
/ / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H WATER SPIGOT & DRAIN INV 8" PVC =139.21' RESTROOMS TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER METAL GATE DAMAGED PAVEMENT DAMAGED PAVEMENT 135
140
145
135
140
145
145
TRAIL
TRAIL
TRAIL
ABANDONED
WATER SPIGOT
& DRAIN
BLOCK WALL
BLOCK WALLDI RIM=143.36' INV(NW)12" HDPE=141.41'
SD
BOULDER
(TYP.)
BOULDER
(TYP.)
ABANDONEDWATER SPIGOT
& DRAIN
POST
DIRT ROAD
DIRT ROAD
DI RIM=142.38'INV(NW)8" PVC=140.46'INV(SE)12" HDPE=140.88'INV(E)6" PVC=141.00'
WHEEL STOP
(TYP.)
CONCRETE PAD &
BENCH (TYP.)
DALIDIO DR. 18" TREE
POLE FENCE (TYP.)
POLE FENCE (TYP.)
2" RISER
100
101
102
LEGEND
/ / / / / / EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CHAIN LINK FENCE
POLE FENCE
SD STORM DRAIN LINESS SANITARY SEWER LINE
O/H OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
AREA LIGHT
LIGHT STANDARD
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER METER
IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
WATER VALVE
GUY POLEGUY WIRESANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUTSTREET SIGN/SIGN POSTSURVEY CONTROL POINT AND NUMBER
BRUSH LINE/DRIP LINE
INTERMEDIATE CONTOURINDEX CONTOUR
POLE WITH LIGHT
TRAFFIC STRIPING (SOLID)
CO
S
20" PINE TREE WITH DIAMETER NOTED
BUILDING
CONCRETE
TRAFFIC STRIPING (DASHED)
BOULDER
TREE STUMP
CONC CONCRETE
DI DRAINAGE INLET
TYP. TYPICAL
BRICK
BLOCK WALL
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
MATCHLINE- SEE SHEET SC-3
FILE NAME: 061-118 SRVY.DWG
No. 9688
12/21/2023
SSMH RIM=145.78
INV (NW) 8" = 137.08'
INV (S) 8" = 137.08'
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/ / /
TRAIL
2-6" LIVE OAK
18" LIVE OAK
15" LIVE OAK
2-4" LIVE OAK
24" LIVE OAK
15" STUMP
27" STUMP
27" STUMP
25" STUMP
21" STUMP
12" STUMP
15" STUMP
12" STUMP
15" STUMP
6" STUMP
12" STUMP
12" STUMP
12" STUMP
8 STUMP
12" STUMP
18" STUMP
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H
1 4 O
1 4
140
145
140
145
TRAIL
TRAIL
BENCH
CONC DISCGOLF TEE
BOULDER
(TYP.)
DALIDIO DR.
ADA PARKING SIGN
TREE
6" TREE
POLE FENCE (TYP.)
POLE FENCE (TYP.)
TRANSMISSION
LINE TOWER
PARK
SIGN
103
104
LEGEND
/ / / / / / EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CHAIN LINK FENCE
POLE FENCE
SD STORM DRAIN LINESS SANITARY SEWER LINE
O/H OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
AREA LIGHT
LIGHT STANDARD
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER METER
IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
WATER VALVE
GUY POLEGUY WIRESANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUTSTREET SIGN/SIGN POSTSURVEY CONTROL POINT AND NUMBER
BRUSH LINE/DRIP LINE
INTERMEDIATE CONTOURINDEX CONTOUR
POLE WITH LIGHT
TRAFFIC STRIPING (SOLID)
CO
S
20" PINE TREE WITH DIAMETER NOTED
BUILDING
CONCRETE
TRAFFIC STRIPING (DASHED)
BOULDER
TREE STUMP
CONC CONCRETE
DI DRAINAGE INLET
TYP. TYPICAL
BRICK
BLOCK WALL
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
FILE NAME: 061-118 SRVY.DWG
MATCHLINE- SEE SHEET SC-2
No. 9688
12/21/2023
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / //
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/ / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H SD
BEGIN LOG BARRIER REMOVALN:2293464.1220E:5760948.8670
END LOG BARRIER REMOVALN:2293548.3120E:5760769.4280
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
WL WL WL WL WL WL WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
BEGIN LOG BARRIER REMOVALN:2293045.1400E:5760902.0830
END LOG BARRIER REMOVALN:2293021.7920E:5760874.8600
BEGIN LOG BARRIER REMOVAL
N:2293267.4301
E:5761084.4354 END LOG BARRIER REMOVAL
N:2293294.2336E:5761066.0740
FILE NAME: 061-118 DEMO.DWG
0 20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
EXIST ASPHALT
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
101 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST RESTROOM
102 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST CONCRETE103 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE104 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST LOG BARRIER105 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST TREE106 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 201 REMOVE EXIST INFORMATION KIOSK
202 RELOCATE EXIST TRASH RECEPTACLE. SEE SHEETS SL-1 AND SL-2 FOR NEW LOCATION 203 RELOCATE EXIST BOULDER. SEE SHEETS SL-1 AND SL-2 FOR NEW LOCATION 301 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST SILT FENCE
302 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST BLOCK WALL AND FOUNDATION303 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST WATER SPIGOT ANDDRAIN. ABANDON EXISTING WATER LINE AND SD PIPE.
CAP AT WATER MAIN CONNECTION
304 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST CONCRETE305 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST BENCH306 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST LOG BARRIER, RETURN TO CITY307 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST TREE AND GRIND STUMP308 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST CHAIN LINK FENCE309 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST SIGN310 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST WHEEL STOP 311 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST STORM DRAIN INLET
312 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST TRENCH DRAIN313 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIST STORM DRAIN PIPE314 GRIND EXIST TREE STUMP315 REMOVE EXISTING PAINT STRIPING 401 RELOCATE EXIST DOG BAG DISPENSER AND SIGNS
102 101 102
302
103
103
103
104
306
308
105
401
401
202
202 202
(TYP.) 203
301
301
302
303
303
304
304
304
304
303
304
105
105
305
305
305
304
305
306
307
307
314
314
314
314
314
314
314
314
306
306
308
104
309
309
309
309 310
310 310 310
311
312
302
313
DALIDIO DRIVE
308
104
106
32' 306
314
315
315
315 315 315 315 315 315 315 315
201
310
310
310
309
36" MULTI-TRUNK CYPRESS IN POOR HEALTH
9" REDWOOD IN POOR HEALTH
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
•
•
••
••
••
••
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
•• ••
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
• •
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
SD
8.00'
6.00'
4.50'
6.00'
3.00' 5.90'
3.50'
L 1
L 2
L 3
C 1
L 5 L 6
L 7
C 3
C 4
C 5
C 6
L 8C 7
C 8
C 9
L 9
C 10
L 10
L 11
C 2
L 12
L 13
C 16
C 17
C 18
C 19 C 20
L 14
C 11
L 15
L 16
C 12L 17
L 18
L 19
L 20
L 21
C 13
C 14
C 15
C 21
C 22
C 23
C 24
L 4
C 25
C 26
C 27
C 28
C 29
C 30
L 32
L 33 L 35
L 36
L 37
C 36
C 37
C 38 L 40
C 39
L 41
L 42
L 43
L 44
L 45
L 46
C 40
C 41
C 42
C 44
L 47
L 48
L 49
L 50 L 51
L 52
L 54 L 53
L 55 L 56L 57
L 58L 59
L 60
C 48
C 49
C 50
L 64
L 65
L 66
C 51
L 22
L 69
C 52
C 53
C 54
C 55
L 74
L 75
L 76
L 77 L 78
L 79
L 80 L 81
L 82
C 56
C 57
C 58
L 86
END FENCEN:2293557.3468
BEGIN FENCE E:5760729.2188
N:2293550.5122
E:5760760.4607
BEGIN FENCE/END FENCE (LOOP)N:2293167.8746E:5761046.5898 N:2293163.2550
E:5761050.4187
N:2293051.8904
E:5760917.5064
N:2293037.2661
E:5760899.8508
N:2293018.7903
E:5760877.7734
L 23
L 88
Curve Table
Curve #
C 1
C 2
C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9
C 10
C 11
C 12C 13C 14
Length
38.9323.68
18.2815.2710.8719.5012.80
6.26 13.6514.20
33.71 5.29
208.86
27.31 Radius
174.50
32.2546.2536.2532.2532.2536.2538.2536.2532.2531.0035.00 245.00
34.50 Delta
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• •• • •• • •••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • •••••••••• • •• • •• • •••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
Curve Table
Curve #
C 15
C 16C 17C 18C 19C 20
C 21
C 22C 23C 24
C 25
C 26C 27C 28
Length
66.7535.3335.3324.3727.18
33.71 66.75
169.49
90.0690.06
76.90 98.70
119.51
54.34 Radius
30.00 19.0019.0013.00
25.0031.0030.00
204.50
48.0048.00
75.5071.50
155.50
68.50 Delta
• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••• • • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
Curve Table
Curve #
C 29C 30C 36C 37C 38C 39C 40
C 41
C 42C 44C 48C 49C 50
C 51
Length
106.64101.70
22.4831.05
7.685.90
112.66105.32
56.50 13.8717.27
6.03 17.44
34.28 Radius
200.00
194.00
24.5030.5024.5020.50
100.00
38.0036.00
36.25 17.5017.5017.5011.50
Delta
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • •••••••••• • • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • • •• • •• • •••••••••••
Curve Table
Curve #
C 52C 53C 54C 55C 56C 57C 58
Length
23.39 15.9912.9417.26
145.60
224.57
196.94
Radius
19.0013.0018.00
24.00 162.00
455.00
124.75
Delta
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••
• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • ••••••••••• • •• • •• • •••••••••• Line Table
Line #
L 1
L 2L 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9
L 10
L 11
L 12L 13
Length
44.54 89.2222.44
30.41 97.73
9.63 92.84
4.014.014.01
4.024.004.00
Direction• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • Line Table
Line #
L 14L 15L 16L 17L 18L 19L 20
L 21
L 22L 32L 33L 35L 36
Length
2.602.604.052.73
24.74 30.00
29.6425.16
8.83 10.00
210.57
10.0016.26
Direction
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • Line Table
Line #
L 37L 40
L 41
L 42L 43L 44L 45L 46L 47L 48L 49L 50
L 51
Length
16.45 3.99
4.05 6.05
4.89 22.5022.50
15.00 39.43
292.12
73.45 10.0010.00
Direction• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
Line Table
Line #
L 52L 53L 54
L 55
L 56L 57
L 58L 59
L 60L 64
L 65
L 66
L 69
Length
6.00 10.01
6.00 173.40
10.0010.00
6.00 10.00
130.80
24.20 6.00
28.79 8.87
Direction
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
Line Table
Line #
L 74L 75L 76L 77L 78L 79L 80
L 81
L 82L 86L 88
Length
7.01 7.067.53
4.00 20.5020.5020.5020.05
17.08 67.59
210.80
Direction
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • •
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
FILE NAME: 061-118 HORZ.DWG
0 20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
EXIST ASPHALT
EXIST
RESTROOM
BUILDING
EXIST CONCRETE
6.00'
10.00'
6.00'
10.00'
6.00'
6.00' 5.00'
LEGEND:
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
•
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• ••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
• •
••
••
••
••
••
••
• •
••
• •
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
• •
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
135
140
132
133
134
136
137
138
139
141
142
143
135
140
145 145
136
137
138
139
141
142
143
144
140
145
139
141
142
143
144
146
140
145
139
141
142
143
144
146
147
140
145
139
141
142
143
144
146
147
148
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/ / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H SD
140
139
141
142
FILE NAME: 061-118 GRAD.DWG
0 20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
SHEET C-3.2 SHEET C-3.1SHEET C-3.3 SHEET C-3.4
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
140
139
141
142
143
40 145
145
141
142
143
144
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / / / / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
12" HDPE SD
3.04 LF @ 0.50% SLOPE
12" HDPE SD
3.78 LF @ 0.50% SLOPE
4" PVC SD
7.27 LF @ 2.00% SLOPE
EXIST 8" PVC SD
27.13 LF @ 4.61% SLOPE
CURB INLET #1
TC=143.89
FL(IN)=142.64FL(OUT)=141.28
EXIST 24x24 SD INLET #2
TG=142.43
FL(IN)=140.46
FL(OUT)=140.46
SD SD SD
EG: 143.56
EG: 143.62
FS: 144.15
FS: 144.31
0.23%
1.35%
0.27%
0.70%
0.29%
0.84% 0.84% 0.84%
FS: 144.17
FS: 144.30
1.54%
1.62%
FS: 143.37
FS: 143.25
FS: 142.89
FS: 143.61
FS: 143.19
FS: 144.28
FS: 144.38
FS: 144.98
FS: 144.88
FS: 145.08 FS: 145.06
FS: 143.79
EG: 143.79
FS: 143.66
EG: 143.62
FS: 143.57
EG: 143.56
FS: 143.46
EG: 143.46
144.82 TC
144.32 FL
FS: 144.32
144.60 TC
144.10 FL
FS: 144.22
144.36 TC
143.86 FL
FS: 144.11
144.12 TC
143.62 FL
144.25 TC
FS: 144.00
143.75 FL
144.20 TC
143.70 FL
144.12 TC
143.62 FL
144.04 TC
143.54 FL
143.96 TC
143.46 FL
144.71 TC
144.21 FL
144.33 TC
143.83 FL
3.69%
3.30%
3.61%
2.00%
145.09 TC
144.59 FL
EG: 144.53
EG: 144.39
EG: 144.28
EG: 144.69
144.92 TC
144.42 FL
FS: 144.89
FS: 144.79
FS: 144.84
FS: 144.67
FS: 144.64
FS: 144.44
FS: 144.44
FS: 145.81
FS: 143.91
FS: 143.76
FS: 144.68
FS: 144.77
1.16%
1.43%
0.54%
0.50%
0.11%
FS: 144.64
FS: 144.67
FS: 145.88
1.09%
0.56%
1.76%
1.77%
1.76%
1.50%
1.43%
0.14%
FS: 143.32
FS: 143.44
FS: 143.38
1.65%
1.63%
FS: 144.21
EG: 143.52
FS: 143.52
EG: 143.92
FS: 144.67
0.13%
0.21%
FS: 143.85
0.50%
6.94%
3.09%
FS: 144.49
FS: 144.57
FS: 143.50
FS: 144.68
0.92%
2.90%
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• •• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
/ / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
1.85%
1.68%
0.62%
1.82%
EG: 143.75
EG: 143.78
EG: 143.73
EG: 143.72
1.73%
1.50%
1.37%
1.60% FS: 143.46
FS: 143.47
FS: 143.46
FS: 143.45
FS: 143.45
1.50%
143.88 TC
143.38 FL
FS: 144.00
FS: 143.55
6.32%
FS: 143.45
EG: 143.62
EG: 143.50
FS: 143.62
FS: 143.50
FS: 143.63
FS: 143.62
FS: 143.63
EG: 143.63
FS: 143.64
EG: 143.64
FS: 143.21
EG: 143.21
FS: 143.49
FS: 143.47
FS: 143.48
FS: 143.47
FS: 143.44
FS: 143.46
FS: 143.49
EG: 143.49
FS: 143.44
EG: 143.44
EG: 143.53
EG: 143.44
FS: 143.49
0.77% 0.04%
TG: 143.44
TG: 143.45
TG: 143.46
TG: 143.47
FS: 143.47
0.98%
1.83%
1.70%
EG: 143.46
FS: 143.52
EG: 143.52
FS: 143.53
EG: 143.53
FS: 143.53
EG: 143.53
FS: 143.35
EG: 143.35
EG: 143.57
0.24% 0.16% 0.02%
1.12%
0.09%
0.14%
0.64%
2.31%
FL: 143.00
FL: 142.78
FILE NAME: 061-118 GRAD.DWG
0 10 20
(IN FEET)
5 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 10 FT
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
100 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
101 6" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0 102 6" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4030, SHEET C-6.0103 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 OVER 24" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE104 WHEEL STOP (48" LENGTH) PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2260, SHEET C-6.0105 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A90A, SHEET C-6.0106 CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0107 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0.
SURFACE SHALL BE YELLOW AND APPROXIMATE FS 33538 OF SAE AMS-STD-595A. (CBC 11B-705.1.1.3.1).
108 SAWCUT AND REPLACE EXIST ASPHALT PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4910. NEW 6" ASPHALT INSTALLATION NOTES PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0109 TRENCH DRAIN AND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT PER ZURN P6-BDD AND Z886-HD, SHEET C-6.0 AND DETAIL 1, SHEET C-6.0110 CURB INLET PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 3350, SHEET C-6.1 111 CONCRETE EDGING (LANDSCAPE CURB), SEE SHEETS SL-1 AND SL-2 FOR DETAIL 112 8" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0113 SINGLE STRIPE PARKING STALLS PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2250, SHEET C-6.1114 INSTALL NEW LOG BARRIER PER DETAIL 30, SHEET C-6.1 103
103
103
103
101
102
109
108
107
110
112
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.2
A
Scale: 1"=5'
GRADING DETAIL A
EXIST
RESTROOM
BUILDING
SEE UTILITY PLAN C-4.0 FORSTORM DRAIN PROFILE
105 105 105
3.00'
111
111
104
104 104
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.4
103
103
TRENCH FL: 142.78
TRENCH FL: 143.00
44.54 LF @ 0.5%
9.00' 8.00' 9.00'
113
(TYP.)
104
18.00'
9.00'
(TYP.)
18.00'
(TYP.)
(TYP.) (TYP.)
(TYP.)
113
(TYP.)
109
103
103
105 105
••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• ••
••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
•
••
••
••
••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
• •
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• ••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
145
146
145
143
144
146
147
145
146
147
148
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
FS: 144.78
FS: 144.87
FS: 145.16
FS: 145.25
FS: 145.54
FS: 145.64
FS: 145.83
FS: 145.93 0.47%
1.72% 0.49%
FS: 147.28
FS: 146.62
FS: 146.20 FS: 146.27
FS: 145.66
FS: 146.10 FS: 146.17
FS: 146.00
FS: 145.72
1.71%
FS: 146.00
FS: 146.66
FS: 145.90
4.11%
1.62%
1.47%
FS: 145.61
FS: 145.78
FS: 143.24
4.27%
FS: 144.79 FS: 144.86
FS: 145.88
FS: 146.15
FS: 146.04
EG: 145.10
EG: 146.10
EG: 146.96
FS: 142.26
2.81%
5.58%
1.72% 1.02%
5.03%
FS: 146.32
FS: 145.97 FS: 145.75
1.23%
1.12%
FS: 145.55 FS: 145.50
FS: 145.89
FS: 145.62
FS: 145.50
FS: 144.91 FS: 145.87
0 10 20
(IN FEET)
5 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 10 FT
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
100 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
101 6" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0 102 6" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4030, SHEET C-6.0103 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 OVER 24" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE104 WHEEL STOP (48" LENGTH) PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2260, SHEET C-6.0105 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A90A, SHEET C-6.0106 CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0107 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0.
SURFACE SHALL BE YELLOW AND APPROXIMATE FS 33538 OF SAE AMS-STD-595A.(CBC 11B-705.1.1.3.1). 108 SAWCUT AND REPLACE EXIST ASPHALT PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4910. NEW 6" ASPHALT INSTALLATION NOTES PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0109 TRENCH DRAIN AND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT PER ZURN P6-BDD AND Z886-HD, SHEET C-6.0 AND DETAIL 1, SHEET C-6.0110 CURB INLET PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 3350, SHEET C-6.1 111 CONCRETE EDGING (LANDSCAPE CURB), SEE SHEETS SL-1 AND SL-2 FOR DETAIL 112 8" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0113 SINGLE STRIPE PARKING STALLS PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2250, SHEET C-6.1114 INSTALL NEW LOG BARRIER PER DETAIL 30, SHEET C-6.1 103
103
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.1
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.3
111
111
1114
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
140
139
141
142
143
144
140
139
141
142
140
139
141
142
143
144
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
FS: 143.40 FS: 143.45
4.11% FS: 143.17 FS: 143.22
4.11% FS: 141.71 FS: 141.76
FS: 140.19
FS: 140.15
0.71%
1.28%
1.52%
FS: 139.46
FS: 139.40 FS: 139.53
FS: 139.59
FS: 140.83
FS: 140.92
FS: 140.92
FS: 140.72
FS: 139.08
FS: 139.04
FS: 138.07 FS: 138.04
EG: 138.03 EG: 137.91
1.53%
3.91%
4.14%
1.64%
1.91%
EG: 140.25
EG: 141.89
EG: 143.43
EG: 143.80
0.96%
FS: 141.33
FS: 140.06
FS: 140.04
0.74%
1.03%
FS: 140.80
FS: 140.87
FS: 140.96
FS: 140.75
FS: 141.13
2.65%
FS: 141.69
FS: 141.38
FS: 142.14
FS: 141.41
0.22%
1.18%
4.15%
1.00%
3.23%
1.10%
FS: 138.94
2.64% FS: 139.18
FS: 139.69
FS: 139.63
1.15%
1.40%
FS: 139.56
FS: 139.49
1.00%
4.27%
2.81%
FS: 140.22
1.76%
3.55% 3.66% 2.93%
0.50%
EG: 139.54
FILE NAME: 061-118 GRAD.DWG
0 10 20
(IN FEET)
5 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 10 FT
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
100 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
101 6" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0 102 6" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4030, SHEET C-6.0103 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 OVER 24" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE104 WHEEL STOP (48" LENGTH) PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2260, SHEET C-6.0105 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A90A, SHEET C-6.0106 CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0107 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0.
SURFACE SHALL BE YELLOW AND APPROXIMATE FS 33538 OF SAE AMS-STD-595A. (CBC 11B-705.1.1.3.1).
108 SAWCUT AND REPLACE EXIST ASPHALT PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4910. NEW 6" ASPHALT INSTALLATION NOTES PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0109 TRENCH DRAIN AND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT PER ZURN P6-BDD AND Z886-HD, SHEET C-6.0 AND DETAIL 1, SHEET C-6.0110 CURB INLET PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 3350, SHEET C-6.1 111 CONCRETE EDGING (LANDSCAPE CURB), SEE SHEETS SL-1 AND SL-2 FOR DETAIL 112 8" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0113 SINGLE STRIPE PARKING STALLS PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2250, SHEET C-6.1114 INSTALL NEW LOG BARRIER PER DETAIL 30, SHEET C-6.1 103
103
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.2
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.4
108
111
107
104
104
103
104
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
• •
135
132
133
134
136
137
135
136
137
138
FS: 141.42
FS: 142.39
FS: 136.68
FS: 133.62
FS: 137.47
FS: 138.28
FS: 139.51
FS: 137.39 FS: 141.03
5.07%
5.89% 140
139
141
142
FILE NAME: 061-118 GRAD.DWG
0 10 20
(IN FEET)
5 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 10 FT
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
100 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
101 6" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0 102 6" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4030, SHEET C-6.0103 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 OVER 24" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE104 WHEEL STOP (48" LENGTH) PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2260, SHEET C-6.0105 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A90A, SHEET C-6.0106 CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0107 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER CALTRANS DETAIL A88A, SHEET C-6.0.
SURFACE SHALL BE YELLOW AND APPROXIMATE FS 33538 OF SAE AMS-STD-595A. (CBC 11B-705.1.1.3.1).
108 SAWCUT AND REPLACE EXIST ASPHALT PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4910. NEW 6" ASPHALT INSTALLATION NOTES PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0109 TRENCH DRAIN AND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT PER ZURN P6-BDD AND Z886-HD, SHEET C-6.0 AND DETAIL 1, SHEET C-6.0110 CURB INLET PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 3350, SHEET C-6.1 111 CONCRETE EDGING (LANDSCAPE CURB), SEE SHEETS SL-1 AND SL-2 FOR DETAIL 112 8" CURB PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0113 SINGLE STRIPE PARKING STALLS PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 2250, SHEET C-6.1114 INSTALL NEW LOG BARRIER PER DETAIL 30, SHEET C-6.1 CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.1
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C-3.3
111
111
111
•• ••
•••• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
•
•
••
••
•
•
••
••
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• ••
•• •• •• •• •• ••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
WL
WL WL
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
SS
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
SS
SS
1+11
0+00
1+00
SD
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
WL WL WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
ELE ELE ELE
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
STATION
135140150
135140150
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+11
12" HDPE SD
3.04 LF @ 0.50% SLOPE
12" HDPE SD
3.78 LF @ 0.50% SLOPE EXIST 8" PVC SD
27.13 LF @ 4.61% SLOPE
CURB INLET 1
STA: 0+04.12
TG=143.89
FL(IN)=142.64(NW)
FL(OUT)=141.28(SW)
EXIST 24x24 SD INLET 2
STA: 0+83.21
TG=142.43
FL(IN)=140.46(SE)
FL(OUT)=140.46(NW)
12" HDPE SD
72.26 LF @ 1.08% SLOPE
STA: 0+07.16
STA: 0+10.95
FL ELEV: 143.38
FILE NAME: 061-118 UTIL.DWG
0 20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
NOTE:EXIST UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS PER CITY OF SANLUIS OBISPO AS-BUILT DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND
COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCATING OR HAVING LOCATED ALL
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND RELATED FACILITIES AND FOR PROTECTING
SAME DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION
EXIST 8" WL
EXIST 6" SS
EXIST IRR LINE
EXIST IRR LINE
1" WATER SERVICE
EXIST
RESTROOM
BUILDING
1" WATER SERVICE
1" WATER
SERVICE
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
400 UTILITIES
401 WATER SERVICE LINE AND CONNECTION PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 6210, SHEET C-6.1 402 SEWER LATERAL AND CONNECTION PER CITY OF SLO STD DETAIL 6810, SHEET C-6.1 401
402
401
401
Scale: 1"= 10'
STORM DRAIN 1
0 0
1"
3.75 2.5
1.25 5
CONNECTION PER CITY OFSLO STD DTL 3540, SHEET C-6.1
CONNECTION PER CITY OF
SLO STD DTL 3540, SHEET C-6.1
CASE A CONNECTION PER CITY OF
SLO STD DTL 3540, SHEET C-6.1
EXIST 8" WL
EG FG
SHALLOW TRENCH PER
COUNTY OF SLO STD DTL
U-4B, SHEET C-6.1
4" SEWER LATERAL
@ 2% W/ BALL VALVE
SEDIMENT BOX
SEE SHEET C-3.1 FORSTORM DRAIN DETAIL
4" SEWER LATERAL
@ 2% W/ BALL VALVESEDIMENT BOX
4" SEWER LATERAL
@ 2% W/ BALL VALVE
SEDIMENT BOX
402
IRRIGATION SLEEVES UNDER
SIDEWALK (TYP.). SEE SHEETS
IP-1 AND IP-2 FOR DETAIL
IRRIGATION POINT
OF CONNECTION EXIST ELECTRICAL LINE
402
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
•
•
••
••
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
•• •• ••
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
• •
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• •• •• •• ••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
135
140
145
145
136
137
138
139
141
142
143
144
140
145
139
141
142
143
144
146
147
148
140
145
139
141
142
143
144
146
140
145
139
141
142
143
144
146
147
148
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/ / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H
O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H SD
135
140
145
133
134
136
137
138
139
141
142
143
144
146
SD
145
146
147
147
FILE NAME: 061-118 EROS.DWG
0 20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
502
••
• •
•
•
504
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL
501 FIBER ROLL PER CALTRANS BMP SC-5 AND T56, SHEET C-5.1 502 TEMPORARY DRAINAGE INLET PROTECTION TYPE 3A - GRAVEL BAG BERM PER CALTRANS BMP SC-10 AND T62, SHEET C-5.1 503 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER CALTRANS T58, SHEET C-5.1 504 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT FACILITY PER CALTRANS T59, SHEET C-5.1505 CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA 501
FR FR FR
7 FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR
FR FR FR FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR
FR
FR
FR
/ / /
/ /
SD
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
502
503
FR FR FR FR FR FR FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR147
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR FR FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR 141
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR FR 1
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR
FR
FR
FR
(TYP.)
FR
505
•
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR FR FR
FR FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
••
FR
FR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
FR
FR
FR
FR F
FILE NAME: 061-118 EROS.DWG
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
GENERAL NOTES
1. CALTRANS CONSTRUCTION SITE BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) MANUAL
(DATED MAY 2017) "FACT SHEETS" SHOWN ON
THIS SHEET ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO
REFER TO ORIGINAL CALTRANS
CONSTRUCTION SITE BMP MANUAL (MAY
2017) FOR ENTIRE "FACT SHEET"
INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION.
Scale: N.T.S.
CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA 505
FR
FR
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT PARKING
INSTALL PERIMETER FIBER
ROLLS OR SILT FENCING
CONSTRUCTION TRAILER AREA
FUEL STORAGE/HAZ MAT
AREA WITH SECONDARY
CONTAINMENT
CONSTRUCTION
TRASH/RECYCLING
CONCRETE/PAINT
WASHOUT
STOCKPILE AREA
4.00'
2.75'
FILE NAME: 061-118 CDET.DWG
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
** CONCRETE OVER24" COMPACTED
NON-EXPANSIVEMATERIAL. CAN
INCLUDE 6"
AGGREGATE BASE
**
**
** 8" CURB WHERE
NOTED ON PLANS
**
CLASS 3 CONCRETE
PER CITY STANDARDS
24" NON EXPANSIVE MATERIAL
UNDER CONCRETE (CLASS II BASE)
SLOPE CONCRETE
TO DRAIN SLOPE CONCRETE TO DRAIN
ASPHALT CONCRETE
#4 BARS VERT @ 24" MIN#4 BARS HORZ ON EACH SIDE
(REBAR TO BE 2" CLR OF SURFACE)
Scale: NTS
CONCRETE ENCASEMENT DETAIL 1
FILE NAME: 061-118 CDET.DWG
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
BDHCPKBDH
12/21/2023
LOG
SD SD
4" PVC
CONNECTION
4" PVC
CONNECTION
*WATER METER AND
APPURTENANCES NOT
TO BE INSTALLED
*ADAPT FROM HDPE TO
BALL VALVE TO PVC
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
••
•• ••
••
•
•
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• •• •• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
•• ••
••
••
• •
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
•• ••
••
•• ••
•• ••
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ /
/ / /
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
0 20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
FILE NAME: 0061-0118 SITE.DWG
702
702
701
504
504
504
701
701
701
701
506
703
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
DESCRIPTION
500 SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
501 EXPANSION JOINTS AT 100' INTERVALS (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OR NOTED OTHERWISE), SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 502 WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS: 20' O.C. SPACING (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OR NOTED OTHERWISE) SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 503 SCORE MARKS AT 5' INTERVALS (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OR NOTED OTHERWISE), SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0504 CONCRETE SIDEWALK: SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0505 CONCRETE EXPANSION CONTROL: SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0506 CONCRETE EDGING, SEE DETAIL 8710, SHEET SD-3507 8" CONCRETE CURB: SEE DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0508 EXISTING LANDSCAPE BOULDERS-RELOCATED:600 SITE FURNISHINGS 601 RECTANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 2-4, SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT A, SHEET SL-3, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS 602 TRIANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 1,4,5 SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT B, SHEET SL-4, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS 603 RECTANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 2-4, SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT C, SHEET SL-3, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS 604 RECTANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 2-4, SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT D, SHEET SL-3, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS 605 RELOCATE EXISTING BLUE PLASTIC TRASH RECYCLE RECEPTACLE, SEE REF. NOTE 202, SHEET C-1.2606 RELOCATE EXISTING CONCRETE TRASH RECEPTACLE WITH FOUR-WAY METAL LID, SEE REF. NOTE 202, SHEET C-1.2607 EXISTING PET STATION AND SIGN-RELOCATED, SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET SD-3608 DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND DOG WATER STATION: SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET SD-3700 SITE IMPROVEMENTS 701 4' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH BLACK VINYL COATING: SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET SD-2 702 DOG PARK DOUBLE ENTRY GATE: SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET SD-2703 CHAINLINK MAINTENANCE GATE: SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET SD-2704 4' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH CONCRETE CURB: SEE DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0 XXX
MCC
EAS
DALIDIO
PA
PA
PA
504
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET SL-2
SLB
502
503
TYP
TYP
502
503
TYP
TYP
PA
PA
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
506
501
501
501
701
701
703
504
702
701
701
502
503
TYP
TYP
606
607
506
501
A
SL-3
B
SL-4
C
SL-3
509
509
601
602
603
501
501
501
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
608
608
608
••
•• •• •• •• ••
•• ••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•• ••
••
••••
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / //
//
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
SD
0 20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
FILE NAME: 0061-0118 SITE.DWG
504
504
509
702
702
701
704
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
DESCRIPTION
500 SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
501 EXPANSION JOINTS AT 100' INTERVALS (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OR NOTED OTHERWISE), SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 502 WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS: 20' O.C. SPACING (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OR NOTED OTHERWISE) SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0 503 SCORE MARKS AT 5' INTERVALS (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OR NOTED OTHERWISE), SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0504 CONCRETE SIDEWALK: SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0505 CONCRETE EXPANSION CONTROL: SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0506 CONCRETE EDGING, SEE DETAIL 8710, SHEET SD-3507 8" CONCRETE CURB: SEE DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0508 EXISTING LANDSCAPE BOULDERS-RELOCATED:509 CONCRETE PLAZA/FLATWORK - SEE DETAIL 4110, SHEET C-6.0600 SITE FURNISHINGS 601 RECTANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 2-4, SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT A, SHEET SL-3, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS 602 TRIANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 1,4,5 SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT B, SHEET SL-4, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS 603 RECTANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 2-4, SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT C, SHEET SL-3, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS604 RECTANGULAR SHADE SAIL: SEE DETAILS 2-4, SHEET SD-1, ENLARGEMENT D, SHEET SL-3, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS605 RELOCATE EXISTING BLUE PLASTIC TRASH RECYCLE RECEPTACLE, SEE REF. NOTE 202, SHEET C-1.2 606 RELOCATE EXISTING CONCRETE TRASH RECEPTACLE WITH FOUR-WAY METAL LID, SEE REF. NOTE 202, SHEET C-1.2 607 EXISTING PET STATION AND SIGN-RELOCATED, SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET SD-3608 DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND DOG WATER STATION: SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET SD-3700 SITE IMPROVEMENTS 701 4' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH BLACK VINYL COATING: SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET SD-2 702 DOG PARK DOUBLE ENTRY GATE: SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET SD-2703 CHAINLINK MAINTENANCE GATE: SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET SD-2704 4' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH CONCRETE CURB: SEE DETAIL 4020, SHEET C-6.0 XXX
508
703
502
503
TYP
TYP
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
507
605
606 607
701
506
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET SL-1
SD-2
4&5
EXISTING CONCRETE -PROTECT IN PLACE D
SL-3
D
SL-3 604
MCC
EAS
SLB
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
701
TYP
•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• FILE NAME: 0061-0118 SITE.DWG
ENLARGEMENT A SCALE: 1" = 2 FT
3-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
1-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
2-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSICOLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
4-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
18.00'
14.50'
1 4•• •• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TYP. AT
PERIMETER
11'-6"
11'-6"
8'-0"
8'-0"
ENLARGEMENT C SCALE: 1" = 2 FT
20.00'
12.50'
2-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSICOLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
1-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
3-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
3-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
1 4•• •• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •TYP. AT PERIMETER
COMMERCIAL NINETY FIVE
340 FR HDPE SHADE FABRIC
COLOR SKY BLUE 495626
COMMERCIAL NINETY FIVE340 FR HDPE SHADE FABRICCOLOR STEEL GREY 495718 11'-6"
11'-6"
8'-0"
8'-0"
ENLARGEMENT D (TYPICAL OF TWO) SCALE: 1" = 2 FT
7.00'
13.00'
COMMERCIAL NINETY FIVE
340 FR HDPE SHADE FABRIC
COLOR SKY BLUE 495626
3-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSICOLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
5-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
1-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
4-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
2-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
6-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSICOLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
13.00'
1 4•• •• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TYP. AT PERIMETER
11'-6"
11'-6" 11'-6"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
20.50'
22.50'
20.00'
17.00'
15.00'
10.75'
MCC
EAS
SLB
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
FLAME RETARDANT SHADE
SAIL FABRIC, COLOR SKY
BLUE 495626
COMMERCIAL NINETY FIVE340 FR HDPE SHADE FABRICCOLOR STEEL GREY 495718 NOTE:
ALL STEEL POSTS TO HAVE A WELDED CAP TO MATCH.
8'-0"
SCALE: 1" = 2 FT
14•• •• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
TYP. AT PERIMETER
COMMERCIAL NINETY FIVE
340 FR HDPE SHADE FABRIC
COLOR STEEL GREY 495718
ENLARGEMENT B
11'-6"
1-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
2.02'
TYP
OF
ALL
18.00' 10.00'
12.00'
12.00' 2.00'
8'-0"
8'-0"
11'-6"
3-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
2-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSI
COLUMNS (8'-0" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
4-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSICOLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
5-STL PIPE 5.563XSCH40
ASTM A500/A500M-10a
Gr. B. Fy=42 KSICOLUMNS (11'-6" AFF)
• • • • • ••• • • •• • •• • • ••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING
30.00'
24.50'
30.00'
MCC
EAS
SLB
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
COMMERCIAL NINETY FIVE340 FR HDPE SHADE FABRICCOLOR SKY BLUE 495626 NOTE:
ALL STEEL POSTS TO HAVE A WELDED CAP TO MATCH.
SECTION 3105 AWNINGS AND CANOPIES NOTES:
1. 3105.1 GENERAL. AWNINGS OR CANOPIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION AND OTHER APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THIS CODE.
2. 3105.2 DEFINITION. THE FOLLOWING TERM SHALL, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION AND AS USED ELSEWHERE IN THIS CODE, HAVE THE MEANING SHOWN HEREIN.
3. 3105.3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND WIND OR OTHER LATERAL LOADS AND LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 16 WITH DUE ALLOWANCE FOR SHAPE, OPEN CONSTRUCTION AND SIMILAR FEATURES THAT RELIEVE THE PRESSURES OR LOADS. STRUCTURAL MEMBERSSHALL BE PROTECTED TO PREVENT DETERIORATION. AWNINGS SHALL HAVE FRAMES OF
NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL, FIRE-RETARDENT-TREATED WOOD, WOOD OF TYPE IV SIZE, OR 1-HOUR CONSTRUCTION WITH COMBUSTIBLE OR NONCOMBUSTIBLE COVERS AND SHALL BE EITHER FIXED, RETRACTABLE, FOLDING OR COLLAPSIBLE.
4. 3105.4 CANOPY MATERIALS. CANOPIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A RIGID FRAMEWORK
WITH AN APPROVED COVERING THAT MEETS THE FIRE PROPAGATION PERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF NFPA 701 OR HAS A FLAME SPREAD INDEX NOT GREATER THAN 25 WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 OR UL 723. ALL FABRICS AND ALL INTERIOR
DECORATIVE FABRICS OR MATERIALS SHALL BE FLAME RESISTANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CCR, TITLE 19, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 8. TOPS AND
SIDEWALLS SHALL BE MADE EITHER FROM FABRIC WHICH HAS BEEN FLAME RESISTANT
TREATED WITH AN APPROVED EXTERIOR CHEMICAL PROCESS BY AN APPROVED
APPLICATION CONCERN, OR FROM INHERENTLY FLAME RESISTANT FABRIC APPROVED AND LISTED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL (SEE CCR, TITLE 19, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 8).
5. 3202.2.3 AWNINGS. THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE LOWEST PART OF ANY WANING, INCLUDING VALANCES, SHALL BE 7 FEET (2134 MM) MINIMUM.
GENERAL NOTES:1. ALL AWNINGS AND CANOPIES SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 3105.
2. ALL FOOTING AND MEMBER SIZING FOR SHADE SAILS ARE PER MANUFACTURER AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CALCULATIONS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO OWNER REP AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF LOCAL BUILDING CODE OR THE 2022 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRICT.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, CONDITIONS, NOTES, AND
SPECIFICATIONS AT JOB SITE AND SHALL REPORT ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO BID AND START WORK TO PROJECT ARCHITECT AND/ORENGINEERS.
6. DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY SHOWN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAILS SHOWN FOR SIMILAR CONDITIONS AND MATERIALS.
7. ALL WELDING DONE AT CERTIFIED WELDING MANUFACTURER.8. IF CERTAIN INFORMATION IS NOTED ON THE PLANS OR ONLY IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, THEN THAT INFORMATION WILL BE AS VALID AS IF NOTED ON BOTH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
9. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. NOTED SCALES ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCE ONLY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AT THE JOB SITE AND SHALL NOT RELY SOLELYON SCALING FOR BIDDING PURPOSES. VERIFY ALL NOTED SCALES MATCH FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. NOTED DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. IF DISCREPANCIESEXIST, LARGE SCALE DETAILS GOVERN OVER SMALL.
10. DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH FACE, COLUMN, GRID, AND FACE OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHADE SAIL FOOTING IN MULCH
2 3"
30"
1"
1%
PER GEOTECH AND MANUFACTURER
LEGEND:
A. BASE PREPARATION AND
REINFORCING ARE SHOWN FOR BIDPURPOSES ONLY. VERIFYREQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILSREPORT AND COMPLY.
B. FOOTING TO BE DESIGNED USING A
MAX. ALLOWABLE BEARING
CAPACITY OF 2000 PSI DEAD PLUS
LIVE LOADS.
C. SEE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN FOR
LOCATIONS.
D. FINAL DETAILING OF THE FOOTING
SHALL BE PER THE SHADE SAIL
MANUFACTURER.
NOTES:
4 1
5 3
6 FC=2500 PSI CONCRETE SHALLOWFOOTING, MIN. 1% SLOPE
12 FINISH GRADE
COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER SOILS
ENGINEER'S REPORT
3 STEEL SHADE SAIL POST WITH DARKGREEN POWDER COATING PER PLAN 45 BARK MULCH, SEE PLANTING NOTES6 3" DOBIE CONCRETE BLOCK
SHADE SAIL FOOTING IN MULCH
3"
48" - FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY
1 LEGEND:
1 2
A. PAVING THICKNESS, BASE
PREPARATION AND REINFORCING
ARE SHOWN FOR BID PURPOSES
ONLY. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS OF
THE SOILS REPORT AND COMPLY.
B. FOOTING TO BE DESIGNED USING A
MAX. ALLOWABLE BEARING
CAPACITY OF 2000 PSI DEAD PLUS
LIVE LOADS
C. SEE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN FOR
LOCATIONS.
D. FINAL DETAILING OF THE FOOTING
SHALL BE PER THE SHADE SAIL
MANUFACTURER
4"
5 24"
4 6
7 NOTES:
1 CONCRETE PAVING2 FINISH GRADE
COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER SOILS
ENGINEER'S REPORT
3 STEEL SHADE SAIL POST WITH DARK GREEN
POWDER COATING PER PLAN
45 COMPACTED CLASS II BASE6 SIKAFLEX (OR EQUIVALENT) JOINT SEALANT7 EXPANSION JOINT MIN 12"
SHADE SAIL FOOTING IN CONCRETE
30"
8 8 3" DOBIE CONCRETE BLOCK
9 9 FC=2500 PSI CONCRETE SHALLOW FOOTING
PER GEOTECH AND MANUFACTURER3 5
48" - FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY
2 RECTANGULAR SHADE SAIL ELEVATION
VARIES
1 • •• ••• •• • • • • •• • • • • •• • • •• • •• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 2 STEEL SHADE SAIL POST PER PLAN
2 LEGEND:
3 3 FOOTING, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
3 SHADE SAIL ATTACHMENT
1 12
2 3
4 6 5
6 1 POST PER PLAN2 1/2" • •••A325, LOCK WASHER345
1/2" • •• •• ••• • • • •• • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••• BOLT (MIN 10 KIPS PROOF
STRENGTH)
6 3
9/16" • •••HOLE THROUGH
4 CABLE CLAMPS
5 CABLE AT PERIMETER PER PLAN
LEGEND:
4 TRIANGULAR SHADE SAIL ELEVATION
VARIES
1 • •• ••• •• • • • • •• • • • • •• • • •• • •• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 2 STEEL SHADE SAIL POST PER PLAN
2 VARIES
LEGEND:
3 3 FOOTING, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
5 CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
FILE NAME: 0061-0118 SITE-DETL.DWG
MCC
EAS
SLB
HARDSCAPE NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR FENCES,
GATES, HARDWARE, & ASSEMBLIES.
2. ALL METAL FENCE COMPONENTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL WITH BLACK VINYL COATING.
3. COMPACT SURFACE BELOW FOOTINGS TO 90% RELATIVE
COMPACTION.
4' CHAIN-LINK FENCE
ELEVATION
1 2-1/2" DIA. END POST2 END CAP3 2" DIA. TOP RAIL
4 TENSION BAR
5 2" DIA. FENCE POST6 RAIL-THRU TOP CAP7 CHAIN LINK FABRIC8 BOTTOM TENSION WIRE 9 CONCRETE FOOTING
10 COMPACTED SUBGRADE11 FINISH GRADE
LEGEND:
4 3
5 6
7 8
10 11
1 2
9 10' MAX SPACING
12" MAX
12 3/8" STEEL TENSION ROD W/
TIGHTENER AT ALL CORNERS
12 13
ADD SIKAFLEX (OR EQUIVALENT)
JOINT SEALANT AT POST LOCATIONS
13 2
6' 6'
4' CHAIN-LINK MAINTENANCE GATE
12'
1 1
2 2
2 LEGEND:
3 2
2 2
3 3
4 4 5 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
6 NOTES:
A. CITY WILL PROVIDE LOCK.
B. ALL METAL FENCE COMPONENTS SHALL BE
GALVANIZED STEEL WITH BLACK VINYLCOATING.
C. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS.
D. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION.
3 3
12"
12 1 3" GALV. GATE POST2 2" TOP & BOTTOM RAILS3 TENSION BARS4 CHAIN LINK FABRIC5 TENSION BAR STRAPS CONCRETE FOOTING, COMPACT BELOW @ 90%GRAVEL
67 LATCH ASSEMBLY8 SUBGRADE9 CANE BOLT
10 CANE BOLT SLEEVE11 FINISH GRADE OR SURFACE
ADD SIKAFLEX (OR EQUIVALENT) JOINT
SEALANT AT POST LOCATIONS
12 1
NOTES:
A. ALL FENCE MATERIAL SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL WITH BLACK VINYL
COATING
B. SEE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN FOR LOCATIONS.
C. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS.
D. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION.
4' CHAIN-LINK FENCE WITH CONCRETE CURB
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10' MAX
11 10
12 13
LEGEND:
12" MIN
14 1 2-1/2" DIA. CORNER & END POST2 END CAP AND BRACE BAND3 1-5/8" DIAMETER TOP RAIL4 TENSION BAR5 2" DIAMETER FENCE POST6 RAIL-THRU TOP CAP7 CHAIN LINK FABRIC8 BOTTOM TENSION WIRE9 HOG TIES AT 12" O.C. 10 CONCRETE FOOTING: SEE 8" CONCRETE CURB DETAIL, THIS PAGE11 COMPACTED SUBGRADE12 CONCRETE CURB SEE DETAIL 4220, SHEET C-6.013 FINISH GRADE14 ADD SIKAFLEX (OR EQUIVALENT) JOINT SEALANT AT POST LOCATIONS 15 15 3/8" STEEL TENSION ROD W/ TIGHTENER AT ALL CORNERS 4 CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
DESCRIPTION ENGINEER CITY SHEET DES. DESIGN DATE
REVISIONS APPROVAL
#
2000526-01
FILE NAME: 0061-0118 SITE-DETL.DWG
MCC
EAS
SLB
4'-0"
LEGEND:
DOG PARK DOUBLE ENTRY GATE
1 2
3 4
5 8
9 8 ••
•• ••
••
•• ••
PLAN
6'
10 10
5 6
12 13
NOTES:
A. ALL FENCE MATERIAL SHALL
BE GALV. STEEL WITH BLACK
VINYL COATING.
B. SEE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN
FOR LAYOUT.
C. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
SHOP DRAWINGS.
D. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
MORE INFORMATION.
1414 15
1 2 1/2" GALV. GATE POST2 2" TOP & BOTTOM RAILS3 TENSION BARS4 CHAIN LINK FABRIC5 TENSION BAR STRAPS6 CONCRETE FOOTING 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR
PAVEMENT
89 FINISH GRADE OR SURFACE
10 GATE12 SEE DETAIL FOR CHAINLINK FENCE
ADD SIKAFLEX (OR EQUIVALENT)
GROUT
13 TIGER COMPACT HINGE, SEE
SPECIFICATIONS
14 10" GALVANIZED STEEL KICK
PLATE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS
15 7
LOCINOX GATE LOCK/LATCH, SEE
SPECIFICATIONS
7 3