San Marino City Council
January 12, 2022

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL  PAGE 2 OF 2
was performed by Michael Baker International, which is part of a comprehensive infrastructure rehabilitation program. Dudek's project covered improvements identified on the MPD as priority 1, located in three separate drainage areas, namely: Los Angeles Harbor East, Palos Verdes Estates North, and Palos Verdes Estates West. The project involves a comprehensive planning and design process that include review of existing information, CEQA documentation, analysis and identification of the final required improvements, engineering design of these improvements (plans, specifications, estimates), bid analysis and preferred bidder identification, construction support, and update of City's GIS database with As-Built plans. The project was constructed in 2017. (Dudek Prime) Mockingbird Canyon Restoration Project, Riverside County, CA. Technical Specialist. Michael Baker is currently providing services for this project that will address a 40-year history of flooding, erosion, and sediment movement in Mockingbird Wash.

Proposed improvements will cover approximately two miles of the Mockingbird Canyon Wash. To complete the project, Michael Baker and its team partners, Dudek (prime) are providing the following services: land acquisition support services; project design memorandum of understanding; updating project preliminary design; public outreach and preliminary design update coordination; land acquisition coordination support; environmental coordination and preparation of the Environmental Information Package (EIP); geotechnical investigation; utility location and potholing; utility relocation coordination; preparation of basis of design report, preparation of bid support and construction cost estimate; structural design and structural design report; preparation of stormwater pollution prevention plan; preparation of the project design plans; preparation of the project specifications; preparation of the Mockingbird Canyon Wash CLOMR Application Package; Stream Stability Assessment; and Structural assessment and redesign of the Pennington Place Bridge. (Dudek Prime) Haigh Road Drainage Channel Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks, California. Project manager for the design of approximately 1,234 linear-foot of 5-foot wide-open channel that was constructed in the 1960's with reinforced concrete invert, and reinforced CMU block walls. There is an existing 15-foot-wide storm drain easement along the west channel wall. A large compound headwall/junction structure exists at the upstream end of the channel where the system transitions from a 60-inch RCP and a 36-inch RCP to the open channel that conveys runoff from upstream tributary areas. On the downstream end of the channel, just south of Newbury Road, the channel base width is constricted from 5-ft to 3.5 feet before discharging into the side wall of curb opening catch basin, then continues eastwards to flow as a 60- inch downstream of the catch basin.
(Dudek Prime) Upper Wildwood Creek Basin #4 Groundwater Recharge and Water, City of Yucaipa, California. Project manager providing engineering design services for City proposed multi-purpose flood control basin with appurtenant channel and preliminary street improvements within Wildwood Creek at the confluence of two tributaries. Project involved basin flood routing, hydraulic modeling and preparation of detailed construction documents. The goals of the project was to reduce peak flows, provide groundwater recharge, and habitat preservation and restoration as part of the Wildwood Creek Watershed Management Plan. This project will go into construction in 2021, and upon completion will also add benefit with respect to groundwater recharge, water quality, desilting, environmental restoration, and recreational trail usage.

Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension, Corona, California. City of Corona. Project Manager. Responsible for roadway hydrology and hydraulics and preparation of drainage PS&E. Also responsible for regional hydrology, hydraulics and design of the regional facilities impacted by this project, which include Kroonen Channel, the Wardlow Canyon and the Mabey Canyon Debris basin modifications. The proposed Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension project is located in the southern portion of the City of Corona along the base of the Santa Ana Mountains. Also responsible for preparation of plans and documents necessary for processing of a dam alteration application with the State of California, Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) for the proposed modifications to the Mabey Canyon Dam. Responsible for coordination with the Flood Control District, the City of Corona, the project geotechnical engineers and other members of the project team.

Michael Baker prepared 12 initial concept plans and developed a comprehensive basis of design report based upon design and environmental studies for the westerly extension of Foothill Parkway as a four-lane roadway from approximately 250 feet west of Trudy Way to Green River Road, a distance of approximately two miles. Michael Baker began a public outreach program, designed a comprehensive website, prepared illustrative communications materials, and organized a large-scale, interactive open house focused on details for the roadway extension.

Michael Baker also provided engineering services for the preparation of roadway plans, bridge and retaining wall plans, right-of-way engineering, storm drain plans, roadway grading plans, traffic signal plans, landscape and irrigation plans, water line plans, and construction cost estimates.

Laguna Woods Village Regional Drainage Improvement Project, Laguna Woods, California. Third Laguna Hills Mutual. Project Engineer. Responsible for hydrology and hydraulics analysis and coordination with the City staff. Michael Baker prepared a Categorical Exemption/Notice of Exemption for a proposed storm drain replacement project in Laguna Woods Village. The document described existing conditions in the project area, provided background information on flooding, and detailed the proposed improvements. The effort included consultation with City of Laguna Woods staff to confirm the methodology and approach and finalize the environmental clearance documents.

1 Charles Greely, PE, LEED AP, QSD

DESIGN/SITE CIVIL/ADA
Charles Greely is a civil engineer with 23 years’ experience working with public and private entities on infrastructure improvement projects throughout California. Mr. Greely provides a diverse skill set, having provided project management and design services on water resource, wastewater treatment, environmental mitigation and restoration, stormwater management and quality control, transportation, and site development projects. As a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), he specializes in the application of low-impact development techniques for infrastructure improvement projects. Mr. Greely is experienced in federal, state, and regional permits and requirements for construction work within sensitive environmental settings and can therefore successfully bridge the gap between environmental concerns and cost-efficient, field-tested construction solutions.

Project Experience
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project, City of Pasadena Water & Power, Pasadena, California. Project Manager for the redevelopment of the City’s existing groundwater recharge facility in the Arroyo Seco adjacent to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The project intends to maximize the City’s ability to capture, convey, and infiltrate surface water resources allocated to it under the Raymond Basin Adjudication. The project features meandering basins to mimic the look of the wash and enhance the aesthetic features through the visual movement of water through the individual basins. Landscape improvements, including native species of shrubs and trees, will also be provided to improve the habitat of the area and the recreational use as the project includes a trail system that connects to regional trails at both ends of the facility.

Mockingbird Canyon Wash Stabilization, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Riverside, California. Project Manager for the engineering analysis and design of stabilization and restoration of the wash.

With significant development and land use changes in the watershed, the wash had become a significant safety issue due to damage and washouts of Mockingbird Road as well as limiting access to private property during storms. In addition to the safety concerns, erosion in the wash put major utility services at risk as well as causing significant loss of storage capacity in the downstream Mockingbird reservoir due to sediment deposition. Lead a team to evaluate design alternatives, perform detailed hydraulic models of existing and proposed conditions, and value engineer an approach that maximized the cost/benefits for the project, mitigated impacts to riparian vegetation and jurisdictional waters, and removed property from the existing Federal Emergency Management Agency floodplain.

Park Drive Drainage Improvements, City of Carlsbad, California. Principal in Charge and lead quality control/quality assurance for addressing retaining wall degradation, slope failures, and drainage issues along Park Drive to alleviate safety concerns as well as reduce maintenance efforts. In addition to standard engineering solutions, the Education
University of Washington
BS, Civil Engineering,
1998
Certifications
Professional Civil
Engineer (PE)
CA No. 69056; WA No.
40823
South Coast Air Quality
Management District
Fugitive Dust Control
Certification, No. 05-08-
3112

LEED AP
Qualified SWPPP
Developer (QSD), No.
69056
Professional Affiliations
California Water
Environment Association,
State Board of Directors
2013–2019

2 team evaluated bioengineering solutions to improve erosive conditions. An assessment of the groundwater conditions impacting the retaining wall and slope integrity was provided as well as a hydrologic and hydraulic assessment to better convey runoff away from the slope face. The alternatives analysis included evaluating multiple solutions and documenting the benefits and costs of each scenario, including roadway improvements.

Dudek is preparing final engineering documents.

Dunlap Boulevard Bridge Removal and Replacement Crossing at Wilson Creek Channel, City of Yucaipa, California.

Project manager to prepare Plan, Specifications, and Estimates to remove and replace the existing Dunlap Boulevard Bridge at Wilson Creek Channel with a new prefabricated steel bridge structure. The goal of the project is to open up Wilson Creek at the bridge crossing, increase flow conveyance capacity, and reduce flooding associated with 100-year and greater storm events. The bridge will have a span of 60 feet and a width of 22 feet to accommodate one lane of vehicle traffic for one-way traffic travelling northwest across the channel and with an 8-foot-wide path for pedestrians. The prefabricated steel truss bridge will be designed to meet current American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials load and resistance factor design specifications. The design speed will be 10 mph for both proposed bridge and transitional street improvements, with the pedestrian paths designed to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design guidelines. The project will also include partial demolition of the existing box culvert, as well as grading and channel improvements required to transition from proposed bridge to existing. It will also incorporate street improvements on Dunlap Boulevard, which will extend on both sides of the bridge to tie to the existing street(s) on the southeast side and to the proposed private development grading on the northwest side of the bridge. The proposed bridge is within the City ROW, but the channel is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and requires coordination with City, County, and other agencies.

Midway Street Bluff–Storm Drain and Slope Repair Project, City of San Diego, California. Worked with the City of San Diego to analyze the damage associated with a failed storm drain system located within Midway Street.

Midway Street terminates at a bluff above the Pacific Ocean, and extensive damage occurred to the bluff, including erosion and loss of infrastructure. Dudek provided a review of the watershed boundaries and potential flow generation to the storm drain system, a review of upstream BMP placement that could help prevent future maintenance issues, and a complete set of design plans and specifications for repair of the damaged storm drain and eroded bluff.

Thunderbird Terrace Homeowners Association Flood Damage, Desert Resort Management, Rancho Mirage, California. Project Manager and lead engineer for the evaluation of flood damage to the primary ingress/egress route for the community. The existing bridge was extensively damaged during the Valentine’s Day flood in 2019.

Mr. Greely led the team evaluating the structural condition of the bridge, temporary stabilization, and fast tracked the preparation and approval of permanent repairs through the City and Coachella Valley Water District as the bridge spans the Whitewater Storm Channel.

Confidential Homeowners Association, Flood Damage Assessment, La Quinta, California. Provided project management and engineering technical analysis for investigations of residential flooding following a late season monsoon storm event. The investigation indicated possible contributing factors to the flooding, including encroachment of private landscaping improvements into the flood channel, failure of berms located in a nearby golf course, and original design deficiencies in the drainage channel system located within the residential properties. To further investigate the problem, the Dudek engineers’ broad work tasks included site review, reconnaissance, and research; topographic survey; flood event research; flood event hydrology analysis; design conditions hydraulic analysis; existing conditions hydraulic analysis; flood damage assessment and mitigation; and final report preparation for use in litigation.

1 Shannon Brown, PE, QSD
DESIGN
Shannon Brown is a civil engineer with 12 years’ experience as a consultant specializing in stormwater, water, and sewer management and infrastructure project design. Mr. Brown is experienced in a broad range of disciplines, including regulatory permit compliance, preparation of design drawings and specifications, hydrology and hydraulics modeling, and geospatial analysis. Mr.

Brown has a background in state and federal environmental compliance, including environmental impact documentation, special studies, and field data collection.

Project Experience
Stormwater System Condition Assessment, City of San Marino, California.

Served as the project engineer for the stormwater system assessment to address several key objectives. Performed a field reconnaissance and survey to model the existing stormwater system, including preparation of a geographic information system database, plan, implement and analyze a CCTV inspection plan, identify project to correct existing deficiencies, develop project costs and prioritize recommended CIP projects and identify potential ongoing maintenance activities.

Coast Boulevard Sea Cave Emergency Stabilization Project, Flatiron West, San Diego, California. Worked with Flatiron West (contractor) and City of San Diego staff on the stabilization of the roadway and the associated improvements to the storm drain system and repaving of the roadway on an accelerated project schedule (under 3 months). Project engineer, which included replacing two storm drain systems and outlets with a single system while avoiding all existing utilities in the roadway and implementing a Green Street BMP as part of the storm drain design. Additional work included preparing the site-specific water pollution control plan and performing weekly BMP inspections.

Cardinal Drive Emergency Storm Drain Project, Flatiron West, San Diego, California. Worked with Flatiron West (contractor) and City of San Diego staff to design the emergency replacement of a collapsed corrugated metal pipe that caused a large sink hole within a steep slope that threatened the stability of nearby structures. Because of the depth of the storm drain, the jack and bore method was used to create a parallel storm drain around the failed section of pipe. A 40-foot-deep storm drain required special design of the cleanout structures, including a dual box design to allow for shallow storm drain laterals to connect to the proposed system. Additional work included preparing the site-specific water pollution control plan and performing weekly best management practice (BMP) inspections.

Rochester Road Storm Drain Emergency Project, Flatiron West, San Diego, California. Worked with Flatiron West (contractor) and City of San Diego staff to design the emergency replacement of a collapsed 18-inch corrugated metal pipe that caused a sink hole. The existing storm drain outfall occurred near the top of the canyon, so as part Education
California State University,
Fullerton
MS, Environmental
Engineering, 2017
University of California,
Davis
BS, Environmental and
Resource Science, 2009
Certifications
Professional Civil
Engineer (PE), California
No. 92771
Qualified Stormwater
Developer (QSD)
No. 92771
OSHA 30-Hour
Construction Safety

2 of the repair effort, the storm drainpipe was extended to locate the outfall at a better natural low point in the canyon. Led the drainage design effort, which included resolving conflicts with existing sewer laterals and main line and the waters of the United States drainage within in the canyon and extending the storm drain an additional 100 linear feet to a better natural low point. Additional work included preparing the site-specific water pollution control plan and performing weekly BMP inspections.

Park Drive Drainage Improvements, City of Carlsbad, California. Serving as the project engineer for addressing retaining wall degradation, slope failures, and drainage issues along Park Drive to alleviate safety concerns and reduce maintenance efforts. In addition to standard engineering solutions, the team evaluated bioengineering solutions to improve erosive conditions. An assessment of the groundwater conditions impacting the retaining wall and slope integrity was provided, as was a hydrologic and hydraulic assessment, to better convey runoff away from the slope face. The alternatives analysis included evaluating multiple solutions and documenting the benefits and costs of each scenario, including roadway improvements. Dudek is currently preparing final engineering documents as well as the environmental documents and permitting.

Municipal Waterways Maintenance Plan, City of San Diego, California. Served as project engineer. The Municipal Waterways Maintenance Plan supports the findings of a programmatic environmental impact statement for maintenance of more than 60 earthen and concrete-lined channels throughout the City. Project work included preparation of hydrologic and hydraulic assessments, associated technical reporting, and planning and construction-level channel maintenance plans. The hydraulic studies include Hydrologic Engineering Center – River Analysis System analysis to determine the extent of maintenance required to restore each channel’s flood control function while minimizing the impacts to sensitive environmental resources in the area.

Terminals Action Plan, Port of San Diego, California. Served as project engineer. Dudek prepared and managed development of an action plan for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit compliance at three of the Port’s marine terminals. The action plan consists of a tenant best management practice (BMP) plan, stormwater monitoring program, program assessment plan, long-term BMP plan, and tenant outreach plan.

Ongoing responsibilities include implementation of program assessment goals, which consists of evaluation of tenant BMP inspection and audit results, comparison of monitoring results to structural and nonstructural BMP installations, and assessment of tenant and terminal user stormwater pollution prevention knowledge.

Trash Amendments Planning, City of Carlsbad, California. Served as project engineer. Dudek prepared a regulatory compliance implementation plan and internal action plan. The implementation plan detailed installation of structural and nonstructural stormwater trash control BMPs throughout the City under a Track 2 compliance pathway and a citywide On-Land Visual Trash Assessment control monitoring program. Dudek also prepared an action plan that serves as a framework for internal implementation of the trash amendments, documenting annual steps for a multidepartment, collaborative effort to ensure compliance within the allotted 10-year time frame. In December 2018, the final implementation plan was submitted for approval to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and an internal action plan was developed in 2019.

As-Needed Project Support, City of Monterey, California. Served as project engineer. Dudek has supported City stormwater program tasks since 2018, including a stormwater fee study and development of the City’s trash amendment compliance plan. The fee study included analysis of the cost of City implementation of stormwater requirements associated with the Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System general permit. The analysis was intended to provide City decision-makers with information on current program costs, revenues, and options for fee-based cost-recovery scenarios for City compliance activities. For trash amendment compliance, Mr. Brown assisted in preparation of the City’s Track 2 Implementation Plan as well as development of internal planning documents for use by planning, engineering, and operations staff.

1 Jennifer O’Brien, EIT

STORMWATER ENGINEER
Jennifer O’Brien is a design engineer with 3 years’ experience in stormwater resources, including stormwater hydraulics and hydrology, low impact (LID) utility design, flood control system plan design, erosion control strategy and preparation, Best Management Practice design, and water resource system analysis and design. Ms. O’Brien has successfully prepared conceptual design studies, final design plans, and construction support for various stormwater and land development projects. She has expertise in two-dimensional (2-D) advanced stormwater hydrologic and hydraulic modeling using programs such as XP SWMM and HEC-RAS 5.0.

Project Experience
Creek Park Master Plan, City of La Mirada, California. Project engineer for the study, coordination and development of the Creek Park Master Plan. The project involved coordination with a landscape architecture firm and the City to incorporate public comments into a functional and aesthetically pleasing park that would also convey floodwaters without the development of sediment deposits in times of heavy rainfall. Work involved hydraulic analysis in HEC-RAS to evaluate the existing condition and develop a proposed condition that would be visually pleasing but also allow for a robust enough landscape to prevent flooding, erosion and sediment deposit.

Haigh Road Drainage Channel Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks, California.

Project engineer for the final design of approximately 1,300 linear-foot of reinforced concrete box to replace open channel constructed in the 1960’s that had become unstable as was causing slope failure in adjacent properties. Work included modeling the entire storm drain system in EPA SWMM as well as final design plans, specifications and cost estimate.

Storm Drain Deficiency Program FY 2016–2017, Rancho Palos Verdes, California. Design Engineer responsible for preparation of construction plans for the City’s FY 16–17 storms drain infrastructure improvement program, which was part of City’s effort to improve its aging storm drain infrastructure. The project involves a comprehensive planning and design process that included: review of existing information, and engineering design of these improvements (plans, specifications, estimates).

Laguna Canyon Channel Transition Structure Improvements at Beach Street, City of Laguna Beach, Laguna Beach, California. Project engineer for the final design of improvements to the Laguna Canyon Channel transition structure upstream of the Beach Street culvert inlet. Prior to the design of improvements, Dudek performed a study on the entire Laguna Canyon Channel Culvert to find deficiencies in the system. Results from the study identified a major restriction point. Following the modeling process, Dudek prepared the complete design plans and bid documents for the construction of the proposed transition structure that increased conveyance through the system by more than 25%. Dudek provided the final plans, specifications and cost estimate.

Education
California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona
BS, Civil and
Environmental
Engineering
Certifications
Engineer in Training (EIT),
166391
Professional Affiliations
Chi Epsilon – Civil
Engineering
Honor Society
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Society of Women
Engineers

2 Laguna Canyon Channel Culvert Flood Alternative Study, Laguna Beach, California. Design engineer for the hydraulic evaluation of the historic flooding of downtown Laguna Beach. This project, focusing on the Laguna Canyon Channel culvert between Beach Street to the ocean, identified the existing system’s limitations and provided the City with several alternatives to minimized the impacts of recurring flooding. Dudek used an advanced hydrologic/hydraulic model to evaluate multiple mitigation scenarios for the City and ranked them based on their feasibility. Given the City’s dense and historic buildings and infrastructure, advanced modeling allowed Dudek to identify unique alternatives that would minimize flood risks AND construction impacts. XP Solution’s XPSWMM was used to evaluate a linked subsurface/surface model (1D/2D) that more accurately displayed the true impacts of various potential solutions. Work involved using a distributed rainfall model (DRM) over a 3D surface that was linked to the entire subsurface storm drain system via surface inlets. The outfall was at the ocean, which entailed a variable tide, which included storm surge. Dudek provided the preliminary plans and cost estimates for a phased approach that would work with the City’s budget.

Bluebird Canyon Storm Drain Outfall Rehabilitation, City of Laguna Beach, Laguna Beach, California. Design engineer charged with preparing concept level design plans for the existing storm drain outfall at Bluebird Beach in Laguna, California. The hydraulic impacts of the proposed design alternative on the existing system were analyzed using EPA SWMM 5 and WSPGW. The outfall was at the ocean, which entailed a variable tide, including storm surge.

Citywide Recycled Water System Expansion, City of Oceanside, California. Project engineer for the drainage design of the improvements to the reservoir site. Work involved hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the site as well as the surrounding storm drain system as well as designing appropriate hydromodifications as required to comply with County of San Diego drainage design standards. Ms. O’Brien is currently completing the proposed grading and storm drain plans and bid documents for the site improvements.

Anaheim South Recycled Water Project, City of Anaheim, California. Project engineer for the drainage design of the pump station site. Work involved hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the site as well as the surrounding storm drain system and design plans for proposed grading and storm drain. Dudek prepared the complete design plans and bid documents for the construction of the $25M infrastructure project. Once construction is complete, the project will provide a much needed supplement to the Southern California water supply and finally convert the substantial Disneyland irrigation demand to a sustainable water supply.

Calle Tampico Drainage Improvements, City of La Quinta, California. Project engineer for the preliminary recommendations and preparing complete rehabilitation and reconstruction documents for a segment of storm drain to alleviate flooding and reduce the risk of future catastrophic flood events in this area of the City. The design features close coordination with a separate project team designing the Complete Streets “road diet” improvements in this area as well. The concurrent road diet project will revise several intersections along Calle Tampico from signalized to roundabouts, improving circulation along the route.

Trabuco Canyon Dam Inundation Study, Trabuco Canyon Water District, Rancho Santa Margarita, California.

Project engineer developed a dam failure inundation map for RMWD in compliance with SB92. Dudek engineers prepared a dam inundation study for Trabuco Canyon Dam modeling a catastrophic dam failure by either overtopping or piping failure consistent with SB92 requirements and FEMA P946 modeling guidelines. The dam failure will be modeled using HEC-HMS to develop a failure hydrograph. The hydrograph was input into FLO-2D to develop a 2D hydraulic model of the flood wave from the dam to the Pacific Ocean. Dudek developed an Emergency Action Plan to provide a plan for emergency preparedness in the event of imminent failure of the dam for emergency response personnel to conduct road closures, evacuation planning, and to identify local materials are resources.

1 Sofie Black, EIT, CFM

STORMWATER ENGINEER
Sofie Black is a project engineer with 3 years’ professional experience as a civil designer specializing in site design, stormwater resources, and floodplain management. Ms. Black successfully and efficiently delivers construction documents and has received municipal approval for multiple site development projects. She has experience with floodplain analysis and design, including hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, as well as implementation of stormwater management facilities and construction best management practices. She is practiced in adhering to federal, state, and local agency design standards and codes. Ms. Black is proficient in AutoCAD Civil 3D, StormCAD, Flowmaster, and additional modeling software.

Project Experience
Drainage Channel Minor Maintenance, City of San Diego, California. Served as stormwater engineer for this on-call project. Reviewed field data for over 360 drainage facilities within the city.

Developed definition/criteria for “minor maintenance” facility condition. Aided the city in determining approximately 20 applicable facilities to perform work on for fiscal year 2021. Utilized geographic information system (GIS) to obtain field data and Excel to produce deliverables.

Consequence of Flooding Analysis, City of San Diego, California. Served as stormwater engineer for this on-call project. Reviewed flood mapping information for approximately 40 drainage facilities within the city. Generated flood inundation boundary. Evaluated “at risk” facilities and infrastructure based on various criteria. Utilized GIS to obtain topography data, HEC RAS to delineate floodplain, and Excel to produce deliverables.

Relevant Previous Experience
Waggener Farm Park and Recreation Center Complex, Town of Berthoud, Berthoud, Colorado. Served as civil design engineer for this 20-acre park and recreation center development. Project was valued at $28 million.

Supported the team during the construction management phase. Acted as main point of contact with architect and other design disciplines. Conducted site observations/reports, submittal reviews, Requests for Information, Proposal Requests, etc. Redesigned detention basin and storm network based on city comments. Finessed fine grading of the site in response to Requests for Information/Proposal Requests.

Kendrick Lakes Elementary School, Jefferson County Public School District, Lakewood, Colorado. Served as civil design engineer for this elementary school reconstruction using a phased design to maintain existing building while constructing new building. The project was valued at $23 million. Designed underground stormwater detention system, coordinated with manufacturer of stormwater chambers, and prepared stormwater report.

Produced phased construction plans to maintain the existing building’s function while constructing the new, adjacent building. Participated in construction administration and submittal review, and ensured contractor was following design standards.

Education
University of Colorado,
Boulder
BS, Civil Engineering,
2017
Certifications
Engineer in Training (EIT)
No. 74093, Certified
Floodplain Manager
(CFM)
Professional Affiliations
Association of State
Floodplain Managers

1 Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP, CLIA

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/IRRIGATION SPECIALIST
Ed Armstrong is a senior habitat restoration specialist and licensed landscape architect with expertise in open space/trail, park, and natural systems planning and design responsive of today's water conservation challenges. Mr.

Armstrong has 23 years’ experience in planning and design for wetland, stream, and riparian restoration projects; watershed and creek systems; regional parks, trails, and open space systems; and streetscapes, with a focus on enhancing public use while preserving and restoring natural habitat. Mr.

Armstrong has been involved in all phases of project development, including site assessment, conceptual design, master planning, construction drawings, cost estimates, technical specifications, construction management, phasing, and community outreach.

Mr. Armstrong’s extensive experience in application of computer-aided design (CAD), geographic information system (GIS), and 3D modeling software allows him to employ a variety of tools to understand important site factors. With 10 years’ experience in engineering for near-earth orbit and geosynchronous satellites and groundstation networks, Mr. Armstrong is able to utilize a systems approach when solving complex problems.

Project Experience
Arroyo Seco Park and Infiltration Basins, Pasadena Water and Power, California. Developed conceptual plans, trail alignments, planting plans, and details for the infiltration basin project. Designs incorporated upland and riparian restoration around nine infiltration basins, including basin slopes and islands, and ornamental landscaping for two parking lots and street trees. The project also included paved and unpaved walking trails around the basins.

Arcade Creek Park Preserve, Sunrise Recreation and Park District, Citrus Heights, California. Served as principal landscape architect for development of PS&Es for an open space park preserve. Improvements included a parking lot, a public plaza with a picnic shelter, trails, bridges, a kiosk with interpretive signage, play pockets, a boardwalk, and creek/riparian restoration. Provided construction management services during summer construction of the park. This project won an award from California State Parks for Trails and Greenways. 24-Acre Park, Auburn Area Recreation and Park District, Auburn, California. Developed two conceptual plan alternatives and a preferred conceptual plan for an expansion to Regional Park for the Auburn Area Recreation and Park District. The final, approved plan includes parking for approximately 140 vehicles, an entry road with parallel parking, a play structure and spray facility, a native plant demonstration garden, shade shelters, a fourstall restroom, a multipurpose turf area, a dog park with separate large- and small-dog areas, and walking trails.

Managed preparation of a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mitigated negative declaration and cost estimate for the project.

Education
University of Oregon
Master of Landscape
Architecture, 1995
Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture, 1994
University of California,
Davis
BS, Physics, 1985
Certifications
CA, Landscape Architect,
No. 4870
OR, Landscape Architect,
No. 717
QSD/QSP, No. 24900
CLIA, No. 91247

2 Morrison Creek Bike Trail, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water, Sacramento, California. Developed preliminary plans for a paved Class I bike trail along Morrison Creek in an economically disadvantaged community. Plans included approximately 1 mile of bike trail, a 60-person amphitheather, riparian restoration, two pedestrian/bike bridges over the creek, an underpass, and an at-grade road crossing. Plans were used in a grant application to secure funding for the project.

Fanita Ranch Trails Master Plan, HomeFed Fanita Rancho, Santee, California. Developed Fanita Ranch Trails Master Plan for trails in a new community development. Plan focused on preservation and enhancement of trails within the nature preserves and included a summary of existing conditions, recommendations for closures and realignment of existing trails, measures to preserve natural resources, maintenance practices, and design guidelines.

Riolo Vineyard Parks, Homes by Towne, Placer County, California. Prepared conceptual plans and construction documents for two parks in the Glen Willow community within the Riolo Vineyards development. The largest of these neighborhood parks encompasses 5 acres and includes a softball field, a U12 soccer field, a plaza area with a snack bar/restroom building, youth and tot play areas, shade shelters, and a low-water-use demonstration garden. The second park includes a shade shelter, a restroom, a deck overlooking Dry Creek, youth and tot play areas, and pedestrian and bike trails.

Sunrise Boulevard Complete Streets-Phase 1, City of Citrus Heights, California. Developed conceptual plans and construction documents for Phase 1 of the improvement project. Landscaping included stormwater swales to collect and infiltrate runoff, median and landscape-buffer low-water-use plantings, textured and colored paving at crosswalks and for sidewalk accents, and smart irrigation control.

Stormwater Management Program, City of Chico, California. Served as project manager to help the City of Chico with nine Low Impact Development (LID) and water conservation projects that include converting turf to droughttolerant plantings, converting aboveground spray to subsurface drip irrigation systems, creating rain gardens, installing a 2,800-gallon rainwater storage tank, and retrofitting parking lots with permeable paving and infiltration galleries. The project was funded by the Proposition 84 Storm Water Grant Program. Mr. Armstrong performed site assessments and opportunities and constraints analyses on each site and developed construction documents based upon original concept sketches included in the grant.

Bell Road Park, Auburn Area Recreation and Park District, California. Developed a concept plan for a 26-acre property that was in the process of being deeded to the Auburn Area Recreation and Park District by Pacific Gas & Electric through the Stewardship Council as part of the California Public Utilities Comission Settlement Agreement.

The plan included tot and youth play areas, soccer fields, a parking lot, an entry road, restrooms, and interpretive elements and trails, sited to minimize impacts to the existing oak woodland. Also assisted with public workshops.

Tempo Park Improvements, Sunrise Recreation and Park District, Citrus Heights, California. Served as principal landscape architect and designer. Developed conceptual design and PS&Es for demolition of a swimming pool and parking lot and construction of trails, stormwater swales, low-water-use plantings, and a weather-based irrigation system. Inspected final grading, irrigation, plantings and other improvements during construction.

Anderson River Park, City of Anderson, California. Analyzed existing facilities and developed a master plan for improvements to a 440-acre park based on City and community desires. Improvements included replacement of aging park facilities, new baseball and soccer fields, parking lots, new restroom/concession buildings, a challenge play area, a gazebo, a water play area, picnic shelters, and a new secondary park entrance with an equestrian parking lot. Facilitated the initial public meeting to elicit needs and desires from the community.

1 John Zanzi, RLA

LANDSCAPE/ HABITAT RESTORATION SPECIALIST
John Zanzi is a landscape architect with 37 years’ professional experience in the private and public sectors throughout California and the western United States. He specializes in design implementation for landscape projects for ecosystem restoration and native plant revegetation, including riparian system and wetland mitigation, water quality improvement, erosion control and biotechnical slope stabilization, and recreation and public access, such as park facilities and trails.

Mr. Zanzi’s expertise includes preparing site assessments, design and construction documents (plans and specifications), and cost estimates, as well as conducting value engineering and bid and construction assistance for planting, irrigation, and other landscape components. He has extensive knowledge and experience in preparing bid estimates, conducting field design and adaptive management, providing construction direction and oversight, and maintaining construction records, including as-built drawings.

In addition, he brings post-construction monitoring experience for revegetation projects, assessing plant survivorship and providing recommendations for adaptive management. Mr. Zanzi applies his direct hands-on and practical construction, maintenance, and post-construction monitoring experience to his planning and design projects. He has 17 years’ experience working in the Lake Tahoe Basin and Truckee River Watersheds. For most of the projects, Mr. Zanzi served as the landscape architect of record, preparing detailed design documents, technical specifications, and cost estimates, endorsing construction documents, and providing construction oversight for quality project implementation.

Project Experience
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project – Spreading Basin Redesign, City of Pasadena, California. The Arroyo Seco Canyon Project encompasses improvements generally located within three separate areas along the Arroyo Seco. The project seeks to improve Pasadena Water and Power Department’s water resources by upgrading existing infrastructure and enhancing the natural habitat and recreational experience for visitors of the local trail system into the Angeles National Forest. Prepared plans, specifications, and estimates for habitat enhancement, landscaping and public amenities/trails for the spreading basins, and access road and parking lots, including planting and irrigation design.

Clairemont Mesa Boulevard Storm Drain Repair, City of San Diego Public Works Engineering Department, California.

Dudek was retained by the City of San Diego through an as-needed consultant services contract to provide environmental consulting services for this project. Prepared landscape architecture design and construction plans and cost estimates for native revegetation and plant establishment by way of container plantings and seeding as mitigation for and in areas of disturbance from storm drain improvements. The project received an Honor Award in 2019 from the American Public Works Association, San Diego & Imperial Counties Chapter.

Education
University of California,
Davis
BS, Landscape
Architecture, 1985
Certifications
Registered Landscape
Architect (RLA), CA, No.
2933; NV, No. 481

2 West Fontana Bioswale Landscape Plans, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, Fontana, California.

Assisted with preparation of landscape designs and construction documents for bioswale revegetation planting areas. The plant palettes for the bioswale revegetation planting areas were designed to include a mixture of native wetland and upland species, including low growing shrubs, grasses, and forbs adapted to seasonally moist and periodically dry conditions. The transitional disturbed areas to be revegetated are composed of native upland vegetation. The construction documents addressed planting and irrigation plans for the bioswale.

Landscape Design Assistance for the Agua Hedionda Creek/Coman Property Storm Drain Repair, City of Carlsbad, California. Provided design for and preparation of construction documents for biotechnical revegetation treatments for slope rehabilitation and stabilization and erosion control for an area of approximately 800 square feet within the Agua Hedionda Creek floodplain. Services included conducting a reconnaissance-level visit to observe the natural resources on site, conducting detailed design to develop refined and detailed biotechnical revegetation treatments and schematic details for slope rehabilitation and stabilization and erosion control, and providing draft and final iterations for the construction documents (planting and irrigation plans, specifications, and estimates). The project received an Honor Award in 2016 from the American Public Works Association, San Diego & Imperial Counties Chapter, and an award for the Outstanding Water Quality Project in 2016 from the American Society of Civil Engineers.

Big Canyon Nature Park Resource and Recreation Management Plan, Irvine Ranch Conservancy, Orange County, California. Prepared habitat restoration, enhancement, and mitigation chapter addressing long-term habitat stressors and management, including routine site maintenance actions, non-native invasive plant control, supplemental watering, and replacement planting and reseeding.

Tahoe Donner Nature Trail Improvement Plans, Tahoe Donner, Truckee, California. Prepared improvement plans for two trail projects in support of Tahoe Donner’s 5 Year Trails Implementation Plan; the trails will be used for mountain biking, hiking, and equestrian recreation and will be constructed as single track trails nearly 2 miles in total length. The improvement plans addressed grading and typical water quality, erosion control, and slope stabilization treatments and facilitated obtaining the needed Town of Truckee grading permit; the plans were used by Tahoe Donner to implement the trail improvements. The plans demonstrated the Tahoe Donner Association’s proposed approaches and treatments to maintain water quality during trail implementation and long-term management consistent with Tahoe Donner’s 5 Year Trails Implementation Plan and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by others. The plans showed the general alignment of the trail expected to be field-fit to site specific conditions during construction and the details that served as a tool box of typical treatments to support the grading design and trail implementation, while maintaining water quality.

Morrison Creek Trail Preliminary Design, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water, Sacramento, California.

Provided preliminary design support for approximately 1 mile of Class I Trail, including pre-fabricated bridges spanning the creek, street crossings, and an amphitheater with a capacity of approximately 60 people adjacent to the trail. Assisted with preparing a cost estimate, including planning and permitting costs in addition to construction estimates. The preliminary designs facilitated a Department of Water Resources grant application for a multipurpose trail.

River Park Open Space and Park Planning, Richland Planned Communities, West Sacramento, California. The project included planning, design, and preparation of preliminary concepts for an open space creek corridor and regional park. The open space creek corridor includes bicycle/pedestrian trails and amenities, such as benches, interpretive exhibits, picnic facilities, and nature trails through the existing oak woodland. The regional park includes a pond surrounded by native wetland and riparian vegetation, a boardwalk with viewing overlooks and interpretive exhibits, an outdoor amphitheater, multi-use sports fields, basketball and tennis courts, and a playground.

Armando DuPont, PLS
Principal | Director of Survey | Calvada Surveying, Inc.

EDUCATION LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS YEARS OF EXP.
- A.A. Civil Engineering, Fullerton
College, Fullerton, California
- Land Surveying, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona
Professional Land Surveyor, State of
California,
P.L.S. No. 7780
Total: 44
With Firm: 32
Mr. DuPont started his career in the surveying industry in 1977. As President and founding member of CAL VADA, he is responsible for all business activities of the company including executive management of technical, field, engineering, design and land survey personnel.

His project experience includes topographic mapping, boundary surveying and analysis, ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, construction and control surveying, preparation of tract and parcel maps, earth work calculations and quantities, and targeting and control for photogrammetry observations.

Mr. DuPont is fluent in managing commercial, industrial and governmental as well as private sector projects. He leads a team of professionals at CAL VADA providing insight and leadership based on his years of experience as a Party Chief, Project Surveyor and Project Manager on a wide array of projects. He has provided work for a number of industries, including providing services to the engineering, telecommunications, transportation, environmental and real estate industries.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Department of Public Works BOE LosAngeles-BOE-TOS-1-Complete Streets | Los Angeles - La Brea Ave, from Coliseum St to Adams Blvd
Mr. DuPont served as the lead surveyor for the Topographic Survey of a Detailed Topographic Survey of La Brea Ave. (7,300 linear feet) for design purposes. This included detailed cross sections of the major streets surrounding the site. It also included topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks and all visible utilities. The topographic survey also included contours that were utilized by the design group to aide in the design. Project also included boundary analysis based on record maps.

Barham Blvd Street Improvements| Los Angeles, CA
Mr. DuPont served as the lead surveyor for the Topographic Survey for Design Purposes 5,500 linear feet along Barham Boulevard (From the 101 Freeway to Forest Lawn Drive in the City of Los Angeles. The survey was used as the base map for future street improvement designs. The Topographic Survey included detailed cross section of Barham Boulevard and also included topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks and all visible utilities. Record utilities were also shown on the map. The topographic survey also included a Civil 3D surface that was utilized by the design group to aid in the design. Project also consisted of researching and plotting the record boundary with the respective assessor’s parcel number for each adjacent property.

NCE | Rumrill Boulevard Complete Streets | San Pablo, CA Mr. DuPont was the lead surveyor for the topographic survey of 9,000 linear feet of Rumrill Boulevard between Sanford Avenue and San Pablo Avenue. The survey was used as the base map for future complete street improvements (road diet, bike lanes, turn pockets) and was performed using a combination of aerial photogrammetry and traditional surveying methods. The topo provided 1- foot contours and spot elevations at 100-foot intervals at back of walk, top of curb, edge of gutter, and street crown. All above ground utilities were located and inverts were provided at all storm drain and sewer manholes. The existing rights-of-way and adjacent lot lines were plotted from available public record information. The final deliverable included a Civil 3D drawing including surface files that was used by the engineering team to assist in their design.

Woodard & Curran | Knollwood Circle Sewer Improvement Project | Anaheim Mr. DuPont was the lead surveyor for the topographic survey of 12.6 ACRES within portions of Knollwood Circle, Magnolia Street and various warehouse parking lots all located in the city of Anaheim, CA. The survey was used as the base map for future sewer improvements and was performed using a combination of aerial photogrammetry and traditional surveying methods. The topo provided 1-foot contours and spot elevations at 100-foot intervals at back of walk, top of curb, edge of gutter, and street crown. All above ground utilities were located and inverts were provided at all storm drain and sewer manholes. The existing rights-of-way and adjacent lot lines were plotted from available public record information. The final deliverable included a Civil 3D drawing including surface files that was used by the engineering team to assist in their design.

GHD - Topographic Survey of Public Right of Way – San Juan Capistrano, CA Mr. DuPont served as the lead surveyor for the topographic survey for ADA engineering purposes. A detailed topographic survey of the 33 ramps for design purposes and 3 miles of public right-of-way was completed under the supervision of Mr. DuPont. The topographic map included an aerial survey of all the streets within the project site. It also included detailed topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks, buildings and all visible utilities. The topographic survey included contours in Civil3D that were utilized by the design group to aid in the design of ADA compliant ramps.

GHD/IEUA | Haven Avenue Regional Sewer System Repair Project No. EN20056 | Ontario, CA Mr. DuPont was the lead surveyor for the topographic survey of 70 ACRES / 1.6 Milles along Haven Avenue from Guasti Road to Mission Boulevard adjacent to Ontario International Airport and located in the city of Ontario, CA. The survey was used as the base map for future sewer improvements and was performed using a combination of aerial photogrammetry and traditional surveying methods. The topo provided 1-foot contours and spot elevations at 100-foot intervals at back of walk, top of curb, edge of gutter, and street crown. All above ground utilities were located and inverts were provided at all storm drain and sewer manholes. The existing rights-of-way and adjacent lot lines were plotted from available public record information. The final deliverable included a Civil 3D drawing including surface files that was used by the engineering team to assist in their design.

GHD/OCSD | FE 18-13 Redhill Relief Sewer (Warner Ave and SR-55, Santa Ana, CA) DIR Project ID 327297 3 Acres
GHD | RCP No. 2019-15697: Alameda Ave/Aladdin Ave – Brookhurst St to Crescent Ave - DIR Project Number: 324011 ½ mile survey of Brookurst Street and Alameda Street in Anaheim, CA GHD | RCP No. 2018- 14888: Underhill Avenue & N. Shakespeare Street & SR-57 Freeway Crossing – Underhill Avenue at Shakespeare Street extending east across the 57 -Freeway to Chantilly Street – GHD

1.5 Acres
GHD | RCP No. 2019-15950: Muller St to Lincoln Ave - DIR Project ID #324253 ½ mile survey of Muller Street, Lincoln Avenue and Crescent Way GHD | McFadden Lift Station 21 Project- DIR Project ID: 336386 ½ mile survey of McFadden Avenue
GHD | RCP No. 2018- 14887: La Palma Avenue (west of East Street) – La Palma Avenue between East Street and Pauline Street ½ mile survey of East La Palma Avenue
GHD RCP No. 2018- 14889: Alley east of Anaheim Blvd. from Wilhelmina Street to Alberta Street – Alley east of Anaheim Boulevard between Wilhelmina Street southerly to the fence line ¼ mile survey of Wilhelmina Street and 2 alleys.

Saul Melgarejo Jr., LSIT
Project Manager, Data Processing Manager and Drafter |
Calvada Surveying, Inc.

EDUCATION LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS YEARS OF EXP.

B.S., Civil Engineering, Geospatial
Emphasis,
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona - 2008
Land Surveyor in Training,
State of California,
L.S.I.T No. 7771
Total: 15
With Firm: 15
Mr. Melgarejo has worked in the field of land surveying since June of 2006, in the capacity of Project Manager for the Environmental Division and has managed projects for some of the industry’s largest clients such as CH2MHill, TRC and Arcadis. He is experienced in topographic mapping, boundary survey, environmental compliance and analysis as well as High Definition Laser Scanning.

Mr. Melgarejo’s educational background is well rounded to include photogrammetry, highway engineering, public land surveys, vector dynamics, fluid mechanics, hydraulic engineering, water supply engineering, structure analysis and geotechnical engineering. He has a BS in Civil Engineering, Geospatial Emphasis from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.

In Mr. Melgarejo’s present capacity as Environmental, Topographic/Aerial Survey Project Manager he is responsible for CAD team oversight, QA/QC, Management and Technology development, project coordination, supervision and delivery. He is also responsible for finalizing all project control including aerial targets.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
MNWD Pipeline Replacements at I-5 and Oso Creek - MNWD/SMWD Plant 3A| Mission Viejo, CA GHD – UlyssesFndino, PE | Project Manager
Phone: 949-648-5203 | Email: [email protected]
Mr. Melgarejo served as the Project Manager for the topographic survey for Design Purposes for MNWD pipeline replacements located near the MNWD/SMWD Plant and Oso Creek/I-5 Freeway in Mission Viejo, CA. The project consisted of providing a full topographic survey of the creek under the freeway, portion of the adjacent golf course and portion of the MNWD/SMWD Plant for a total of 24 acres. Calvada provided Professional Land Surveying Services including Topographic Surveys, Boundary/Easement Mapping, Aerial Photogrammetry and Survey Control. The project was completed within 25 days from field to end delivery.

Palm Desert Groundwater Replenishment Project| Palm Desert, CA Stantec – Connie Adera, PE (CO), ENV SP | Environmental Engineer Phone: 626-568-6283 | Email: [email protected]
Mr. Melgarejo served as the Project Manager for the topographic survey for Design Purposes of the Coachella Valley Water District (Palm Desert Operations) Owned Facility located at 75525 Hovley Ln E, Palm Desert, CA 92211. The project consisted of providing a full topographic survey of roughly 195 ACRES. Calvada provided Professional Land Surveying Services including Topographic Surveys, Boundary Mapping, Aerial Photogrammetry Survey and Survey Control. The project was completed within 1 month from field to end delivery.

Coachella Cultivation Farm Projects #1 and #2 | Coachella, CA Infrastructure Engineers – Robbi Doncost | Project Manager Phone: 714-940-0100 x5125 | Email: [email protected] Mr. Melgarejo served as the Project Manager for the topographic survey for Design Purposes of the Coachella Cultivation Farms Facility located on Harrison Avenue in Coachella, CA. The project consisted of providing a full topographic survey of roughly 34 ACRES. Calvada provided Professional Land Surveying Services including Topographic Surveys, Boundary Mapping, Aerial Photogrammetry Survey and Survey Control. The project was completed within 20 days from field to end delivery.

Barham Blvd Street Improvements| Los Angeles, CA | Langan | Fred Irianto| Senior PM | P: 714-864-7139 | [email protected] Mr. Melgarejo served as the project manager and point of contact for the topographic survey for Design Purposes 5,500 linear feet along Barham Boulevard (From the 101 Freeway to Forest Lawn Drive in the City of Los Angeles. The survey was used as the base map for future street improvement designs. The Topographic Survey included detailed cross section of Barham Boulevard and also included topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks and all visible utilities. Record utilities were also shown on the

map. The topographic survey also included a Civil 3D surface that was utilized by the design group to aid in the design. Project also consisted of researching and plotting the record boundary with the respective Assessor’s Parcel Number for each adjacent property.

Department of Public Works BOE LosAngeles-BOE-TOS-1-Complete Streets - La Brea Ave, from Coliseum St to Adams Blvd Tetra Tech | Nate Schreiner, PE| Project Manager - P: 949-809-5177| [email protected] Mr. Melgarejo served as the project manager and point of contact for the topographic survey of a detailed topographic survey of La Brea Ave. (7,300 linear feet) for design purposes. This included detailed cross sections of the major streets surrounding the site. It also included topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks and all visible utilities. The topographic survey also included contours that were utilized by the design group to aid in the design. Project also included boundary analysis based on record maps.

Woodard & Curran | Knollwood Circle Sewer Improvement Project | Anaheim Mr. Melgarejo was the project manager for the topographic survey of 12.6 ACRES within portions of Knollwood Circle, Magnolia Street and various warehouse parking lots all located in the city of Anaheim, CA. The survey was used as the base map for future sewer improvements and was performed using a combination of aerial photogrammetry and traditional surveying methods. The topo provided 1-foot contours and spot elevations at 100-foot intervals at back of walk, top of curb, edge of gutter, and street crown. All above ground utilities were located and inverts were provided at all storm drain and sewer manholes. The existing rights-of-way and adjacent lot lines were plotted from available public record information. The final deliverable included a Civil 3D drawing including surface files that was used by the engineering team to assist in their design.

GHD/IEUA | Haven Avenue Regional Sewer System Repair Project No. EN20056 | Ontario, CA Mr. Melgarejo was the project manager for the topographic survey of 70 ACRES / 1.6 Milles along Haven Avenue from Guasti Road to Mission Boulevard adjacent to Ontario International Airport and located in the city of Ontario, CA. The survey was used as the base map for future sewer improvements and was performed using a combination of aerial photogrammetry and traditional surveying methods. The topo provided 1-foot contours and spot elevations at 100-foot intervals at back of walk, top of curb, edge of gutter, and street crown. All above ground utilities were located and inverts were provided at all storm drain and sewer manholes. The existing rights-of-way and adjacent lot lines were plotted from available public record information. The final deliverable included a Civil 3D drawing including surface files that was used by the engineering team to assist in their design.

Project Manager for the following projects:

GHD/OCSD | FE 18-13 Redhill Relief Sewer (Warner Ave and SR-55, Santa Ana, CA) DIR Project ID 327297 3 Acres on Warner Avenue over SR-55.

GHD | RCP No. 2019-15697: Alameda Ave/Aladdin Ave – Brookhurst St to Crescent Ave - DIR Project Number: 324011 ½ mile survey of Brookurst Street and Alameda Street in Anaheim, CA GHD | RCP No. 2018- 14888: Underhill Avenue & N. Shakespeare Street & SR-57 Freeway Crossing – Underhill Avenue at Shakespeare Street extending east across the 57 -Freeway to Chantilly Street – GHD

1.5 Acres
GHD | RCP No. 2019-15950: Muller St to Lincoln Ave - DIR Project ID #324253 ½ mile survey of Muller Street, Lincoln Avenue and Crescent Way GHD | McFadden Lift Station 21 Project- DIR Project ID: 336386 ½ mile survey of McFadden Avenue
GHD | RCP No. 2018- 14887: La Palma Avenue (west of East Street) – La Palma Avenue between East Street and Pauline Street ½ mile survey of East La Palma Avenue
GHD RCP No. 2018- 14889: Alley east of Anaheim Blvd. from Wilhelmina Street to Alberta Street – Alley east of Anaheim Boulevard between Wilhelmina Street southerly to the fence line
¼ mile survey of Wilhelmina Street and 2 alleys.

Hashmi Quazi, PhD, PE, GE
Principal-in-Charge
Dr. Quazi has over 34 years of experience providing
geotechnical engineering services and has earned a reputation for providing quality work in an honest and ethical manner, on time and within budget. In his capacity as Principal in Charge or Project Manager, Dr. Quazi provides quality control, budget oversight, and technical assistance on storm drains, sewer pipelines, water pipelines and related projects.

Relevant Experience
Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain, Temecula, CA. Principal in Charge. Provided technical and budget oversight, resource allocation, and contract management for the geotechnical investigation. The project consists of 2, 10-foot diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) runs parallel along Butterfield Stage Road in Temecula, California. It is planned to install a third 10-foot diameter RCP adjacent/parallel to the existing pipes. The length of the new storm drain will be about 1,700 linear feet. It will be from 1,000 feet north of the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Temecula Parkway to 700 feet south. Besides the storm drain pipe the project will include a reinforced concrete junction structure, 8’ (H) x 11’ (W) Caltrans RCB, concrete apron with cutoff wall and head walls.

Cypress Avenue Storm Drain, Fontana, CA. Principal in Charge. Provides technical oversight and budget control for the geotechnical investigation report. The project includes design and construction of an approximately 6,600 feet (1.25-mile) long storm drain system along Foothill Boulevard from Cypress Avenue to Sierra Avenue and along Cypress Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Orange Way. The storm drain will connect to an existing storm drain system that is part of the West Fontana Channel.

Three System Storm Drain, Chino, CA. Principal-in-Charge. Provided technical oversight and budget control for the geotechnical investigation report. The project consisted of the design and construction of 4,740 feet of 36-inch to 54-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipes (RCP) at Ross Avenue, Garfield Street, Walnut Avenue and Magnolia Avenue in Chino, California. The pipe was installed using open cut and cover techniques.

Chino Storm Drain Installation, Chino, CA. Principal in Charge. Provides technical oversight and budget control for the geotechnical investigation report. The project consisted of the design and construction of approximately 1,300 linear feet of storm drain. The location of the storm drains and lengths were Ross Avenue from Riverside Drive to Walnut Avenue - 2,650 linear feet, Walnut Avenue from Ross Avenue to Magnolia Avenue - 660 linear feet and Magnolia Avenue from Walnut Avenue to State Route 60 undercrossing - 1,300 linear feet.

Mills Avenue French Drain Installation, Claremont, CA. Principal in Charge. Provides technical oversight and budget control for the water infiltration testing and geotechnical investigation report.

The project will consist of installing a French Drain about 180 feet long and 4 - 6 feet deep on the west side of Mills Avenue at Brigham Young Drive. The storm drain was in the City’s right-of-way extending most of the length of the property (3563 Mills Avenue) that is currently being developed on the west side of the street.

EDUCATION
▪ Ph.D., Civil Engineering, University
of Arizona, 1987
▪ M.S., Civil Engineering, Arizona
State University, 1982
▪ B.S., Bangladesh Engineering
University, 1978

REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS
▪ California, Civil Engineer, #46651
▪ California, Geotechnical Engineer,
#2517

Zahangir Alam, PhD, PE
Senior Staff Engineer
Dr. Alam has over 6 years of experience involving investigation and engineering analysis. His field experience includes soil investigation and sampling. In his experience, Dr. Alam has prepared various detailed reports based on field data and observations, laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering principles for storm drains, sewer pipelines, water pipelines and other related project types.

Relevant Experience
Cypress Avenue Storm Drain, Fontana, CA. Senior Staff
Engineer. Managed fieldwork and paperwork and prepared
geotechnical investigation report for the project. The project includes design and construction of an approximately 6,600 feet (1.25-mile) long storm drain system along Foothill Boulevard from Cypress Avenue to Sierra Avenue and along Cypress Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Orange Way. The storm drain will connect to an existing storm drain system that is part of the West Fontana Channel; currently being designed by San Bernardino County Flood Control District.

Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain, Temecula, CA. Senior Staff Engineer. Managed fieldwork and paperwork and prepared geotechnical investigation report for the project. The project consists of 2, 10-foot diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) runs parallel along Butterfield Stage Road in Temecula, California. It is planned to install a third 10-foot diameter RCP adjacent/parallel to the existing pipes. The length of the new storm drain will be about 1,700 linear feet. It will be from 1,000 feet north of the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Temecula Parkway to 700 feet south. Besides the storm drain pipe the project will include a reinforced concrete junction structure, 8’ (H) x 11’ (W) Caltrans RCB, concrete apron with cutoff wall and head walls.

EVMWD WRF Expansion & Upgrade, Lake Elsinore, CA. Senior Staff Engineer. Managed fieldwork and paperwork and prepared the geotechnical investigation. The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) constructed a 4.0 MGD Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Plant to expand the existing plant. Work included upgrades to the existing 8.0 MGD Extended Aeration Plant, plant-wide comprehensive condition assessment, Distributed Control System (DCS) conversion to SCADA and other limited upgrades. The RWRF improvements included clarifier 6 and well point system, secondary equalization and stormwater ponds, diversion structure, stormwater drainage ditch retaining walls, stormwater return pump station, operations building expansion and maintenance workshop.
40th Street Widening, San Bernardino, CA. Senior Staff Engineer. Managed fieldwork and paperwork and prepared reports for the geotechnical investigation of the project. The project included widening from 2 to 4 lanes and reconstruction of 1,550 linear feet of 40th Street from Johnson Street to Electric Avenue in the City of San Bernardino, California. The project also includes catch basin and storm drain in 40th Street and signal poles in the intersection of Electric Avenue. The project included curb and gutter; sidewalks; access ramps; traffic signal modification; signing; striping; and streetlights.

EDUCATION
▪ Ph.D., Geotechnical Engineering,
University of Texas at Arlington,
2016
▪ B.S., Bangladesh University of
Engineering and Technology, 2009

CERTIFICATIONS
▪ PE No. 141024, Texas Board of
Professional Engineers

KELSEY STRUCTURAL RESUMES
Guy Kelsey, PE, SE
Principal Structural Engineer
Mr. Kelsey has over 13 years of experience in structural engineering, designing both new and retrofit projects for various types of structures including infrastructure,
military, commercial, and water/wastewater facilities. Mr. Kelsey has performed extensive structural design, seismic analysis, evaluation and condition assessments for new and existing buildings, infrastructure, civil and water/wastewater structures throughout California. He has a passion for creative engineering design while providing efficient, cost-effective solutions for his clients.

Relevant Project Experience
City of San Diego Box Culvert Transition Structure Emergency Repair Project, San Diego, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for multiple transition box structures, custom curved box culverts, and other miscellaneous concrete structures for the City of San Diego. The transition structures consisted of custom reinforced concrete vertical shafts with depths up to 60’ below grade supporting City standard circular manholes that extended the upper 20’ to roads above. A key aspect of the project included the connection of a new curved box culvert to a large arch shaped corrugated steel storm drain tunnel, which required a new concrete frame structure with a custom connection consisting of through-bolted curved plates buttressing each side of the existing tunnel shell designed to resist heavy soil surcharge loads from above.

City of San Diego Sheldon Drive Sewer Improvements, La Mesa, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for a 10’-0” tall v-shaped concrete retaining wall adjacent to a new manhole structure for the City of La Mesa. The wall was located on a steep sloping property near existing residences where a new manhole and piping was required to be installed. The new manhole structure and piping penetrated the retaining wall foundation, requiring special considerations for the reinforcing detailing, constrained space and irregular configuration at the site while minimizing disturbance to local traffic and the community.

Helen Woodward Animal Center Stormwater Upgrades, Ranch Santa Fe, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for a precast below grade wet well foundation. The foundation consisted of reinforced concrete and accounted ground water pressure due to the high-water table at the site. The design was coordinated with the precast manufacturer for the wall foundation connection and roof slab design. Waterproofing details were provided and a stringent precast concrete performance specification was developed to help ensure a leak-free and long-lasting structure. The design followed the requirements of the California Building Code and included environmental factors for liquid containing structures per ACI 350-06 to limit cracking of the concrete.

Padre Dam Water Reclamation Facility Clearwell Emergency Repair Project, Santee, CA – Mr. Kelsey provided the emergency repair design of the PDMWD WRF Clearwell in Santee, CA as a subconsultant to Dudek as part of their current asneeded engineering contract. The project included concrete rehabilitation due to extensive concrete cover loss with some corroded rebar repair due to sulfuric acid exposure. The condition assessment and repair were performed during a shutdown, therefore the report, recommendations and cost estimates were completed simultaneous to the mobilization of the contractor in order to meet the project schedule. The concrete repairs were coordinated with the required coating surface preparation to be applied after concrete repair curing and KS performed structural observations of the work to ensure proper implementation.

City of San Diego Cooks Cave Emergency Project, La Jolla, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the emergency design for a replacement pavement slab as a subconsultant to Dudek as part of an emergency storm drain repair for the City of San Diego.

Design included a reinforced concrete slab designed for H20 loading spanning over (2) shallow storm drain pipe trenches to prevent surcharging of the HDPE pipes due to vehicle loading. The project required a quick design turnaround and cost-effective solution to minimize construction time and limit traffic impacts while completing the project before the wet season.

Vista Irrigation District AB Line and Meyer’s Siphon, Vista, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for a new siphon transition structure for Vista Irrigation District in Vista, CA. The structure consisted of a below-grade reinforced concrete vault approximately 8’-0” wide x 20’-0” long x 10’ deep. The vault had two interior levels with upper and lower cells to accommodate the inlet at an existing open flume and elevation drop to the outlet siphon pipe. The structure was designed to withstand thrust forces and considered the differential soil lateral pressures due to its location on a slope.

Education/Professional Registration
BS, Structural Engineering, 2008, UCSD
MS, Structural Engineering, 2012, UCSD
Civil Engineer in California, 2011, No. 77675
Structural Engineer in California, 2014, No. 6099

KELSEY STRUCTURAL RESUMES
Rainbow Municipal Water District Moosa Crest Waterline Pipeline Bridge, Rainbow, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the emergency design of the new Moosa Crest Pipeline Bridge Crossing for Rainbow Municipal Water District (RMWD) to replace an existing pipeline crossing that was destroyed during heavy rains. The pipeline crosses over a river with foundations that were scoured out during heavy flooding. The new pipeline and foundations required a quick solution and design as the existing pipe had to be taken out of service and diverted following its collapse. Design included new concrete bridge abutments, bridge anchorage, and preliminary design of the steel bridge crossing.

City of San Diego Bear Drive Retaining Wall Replacement, San Diego, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for a new 10’-0” tall concrete retaining wall with vehicle barrier. The 100’ long wall as located on a narrow, downward sloping residential street with limited space. Special considerations for construction and traffic access were required and a Caltrans impact barrier was incorporated on top of the wall for safety. Site visits were performed for observations of the existing wall configuration and considerations for possible impacts to nearby residences located directly adjacent to the street.

City of Carlsbad Lake Calavera Outlet Improvements, Carlsbad, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for improvements of an existing outlet vault and pipe supports for the City of Carlsbad. The project consisted of strengthening modifications to an existing concrete below grade vault due to a new pipe connection with steel bolted cover. The new pipe and steel cover imposed thrust loads on the existing outlet structure, which required the construction of a new structural wall with epoxy reinforcing steel dowels embedded into the existing vault wall to resist the loading.

City of San Diego North City Conveyance System, San Diego, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for the City of San Diego NCCS project which included a new pipeline bridge and dechlorination structure. The 48” diameter pipeline utility bridge spanned 100’ over an existing railway under the existing Miramar Road concrete bridge. The pipeline bridge included a new steel framed support structure anchored to the existing bridge abutments and columns. Considerations for gravity, seismic and thermal expansion loads were required during design. Slip connections were utilized for longitudinal expansion and the pipe was designed to free span over 30’ between bridge columns South Coast Water District Lift Station 6 Rehab - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design services for the foundation and wall rehabilitation of an existing CMU building due to foundation settlement at the South Coast Water District (SCWD) Lift Station 6 in Laguna Beach, California. This project had to consider constructability due to limited site access and space, and the complexity of leveling the existing building without damaging the existing equipment and underground utilities while remaining operational. The scope of work included site visits for structural observations, repair recommendations, construction documents for the specification of a helical anchor foundation system, and the required epoxy injection repairs for cracking that had occurred.

Gafner Advanced Water Treatment Plant Improvements Project, Leucadia, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for improvements at the existing Gafner Advanced Water Treatment Plant for Leucadia Wastewater district including design for facilities such as clear wells, chlorine contact tanks, reactor/clarifiers, and filter structures. The project consisted of a condition assessment and report, structural repair drawings, and cost estimates for repairs to multiple structures. The design included the replacement of structural steel beam supports for existing pumps, and the design of new steel supports for new pumps and mixers, concrete surface and crack repair, and steel corrosion repair details.

OMWD Neighborhood No.1 Pump Station, San Diego, CA - Mr. Kelsey provided the structural design for a new sewer pump station and electrical building to be constructed in the 4S Ranch neighborhood of San Diego, CA for Olivenhain Municipal Water District. The project included a reinforced concrete rectangular below grade pump station and an above grade CMU electrical building with steel framed roof structure. Numerous penetrations and suspended equipment at the pump station top slab required precise reinforcement detailing to reduce rebar congestions and improve the performance of the structure.

General Atomics Flood Wall, San Diego, CA – Mr. Kelsey provided the QA/QC review for the structural design of approximately 2,500 lineal feet of concrete masonry unit retaining/flood walls for General Atomics (GA). Heavy rains in the Sorrento Valley area of San Diego had flooded several GA buildings prompting construction of watertight flood walls. Poor soil conditions coupled with the high flood plain elevation required the use of enlarged concrete foundations, drilled piers and extensive collaboration with the geotechnical engineer to provide safe wall designs capable of resisting lateral fluid and buoyant uplift pressures. A 500 lineal foot drilled pier wall was required next to an existing stormwater channel which required advanced pile analysis to minimize embedment depths, demolition and excavation required.

Thomas (T.C.) Mueller has over twenty-eight (28) years of hands-on general engineering contracting experience in the counties of San Diego, Orange, LA, Riverside and San Bernardino area with emphasis on safety and production.

Familiarity with various types of utility installation, soil conditions, excavation equipment, traffic control and safe practices. Experience installing utilities is invaluable in determining locations and depths of existing utilities when potholing and locating.

Customer Project Name Description
Eastern Municipal Water Dist. McCall Blvd Pipeline Utility Potholing via Air/Vacuum
Eastern Municipal Water Dist. Las Brisas Transmission Pipeline Utility Potholing via Air/Vacuum
Gannett Flemming/Eastern
Municipal Water
Murrieta Rd Transmission Pipeline
Improv.

Utility Potholing
via Air/Vacuum
Kennedy Jenks – City of
Carlsbad
Carlsbad Ph 3 Rec. Water Pipeline Utility Potholing
via Air/Vacuum
Kennedy Jenks/Rancho
Calif MWD
Temecula Pkway Recycled Water
Pipeline D181
Utility Potholing
via Air/Vacuum
Kennedy Jenks/Mojave
Water Agency
Adelanto R3 Extension Proj. Utility Potholing
via Air/Vacuum
Krieger Stewart/ Rancho
Calif MWD
RCWD Center DR. PWP Utility Potholing
via Air/Vacuum
1 Education
1985– 1989 Orange Glen High
School – Escondido, CA
Licenses/Certifications
10-Hr OSHA, Competent
Person/Confined Space,
HAZCOM-MSDS, Jobsite
Safety Inspection, Staking
University Certificate of
Locating Competency
(Electro-magnetic
instruments) Louisiana Tech
University Certificate of Utility
Investigation
Years of Experience
28 years
Firm
Thomas C. Mueller, V.P. Field Operations
VP Field Operations |

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

800.450.1818 | [email protected]
DUDEK.COM

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Engaged and Connected Residents
• Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
• Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
When the City Council reorganizes, it is necessary to revise the Council Delegates and Alternates List. Traditionally, the Mayor, with the consent of the Council, proposes the assignments to the various committees.

DISCUSSION
The Mayor’s recommended assignments are detailed in Attachment 1. Approval of the motion noted below would constitute acceptance of the assignments noted in Attachment 1.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
None.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the staff report as to legal form.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: Christina Baker, City Clerk
DATE: January 12, 2022
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE LIST FOR 2022
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

RECOMMENDATION
The Mayor has recommended assignments to City and/or regional bodies. If the City Council concurs with the Mayor’s recommendations, the appropriate motion would be:
“I move to approve the Council List of Delegates and Alternates to agency boards, commissions, and City activities for 2022.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Council Delegates and Alternates List

COUNCIL DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
2022

OTHER AGENCIES

LOS ANGELES COUNTY CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE
Attend periodic meetings; duties are to appoint City representatives to such Boards, Commissions and Agencies as may be required by law, i.e., LAFCO, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Advisory Committee; and to nominate for appointment Members to the California Coastal Commission. Pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the Los Angeles County City Selection Committee, the Mayor is appointed delegate.
500 West Temple Street Meets 3-4 times annually at the Chair’s call Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 974-1431
Delegate: Jakubowski Alternate: Shepherd Romey

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Attend monthly Board of Director meetings; serve as informational liaison for the District. Each member of the Districts' Boards of Directors that attends a meeting is entitled to receive compensation in the amount of $125 for each meeting attended. Pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code section 4730, the Mayor is appointed delegate.
1955 Workman Mill Road 4th Wednesday
Whittier, CA 90607-4988 1:30pm
(562) 699-7411
Delegate: Jakubowski Alternate: Ude

CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY (CJPIA)
Attend annual meeting; serve as informational liaison. At the meeting, the president and vice president of the Authority and other members of the Executive Committee are elected, reports of the affairs of the Authority are considered, and any other business may be transacted which is within the powers of the Board of Directors.
8081 Moody Street Annual Meeting in July
La Palma, CA 90623
(562) 467-8700
Delegate: Ude Alternate: Human Resources Director (TBD)

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE Attend monthly meeting events; serve as informational liaison, particularly with regard to pending legislation and/or training opportunities.

P.O. Box 1444 1st Thursday (Dark in July)
Monrovia, CA 91017 7pm (Dinner)
(626) 305-1315
Delegate: Huang Alternate: Shepherd Romey

SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SGV COG)
Attend monthly Governing Board meetings as a voting member; may optionally serve on policy committees (Water & Stormwater, Transportation, Energy & Environment, or Homelessness); serve as informational liaison. Receive $75 stipend per Governing Board meeting. 602 E. Huntington Drive (@ Shamrock) 3rd Tuesday
Monrovia, CA 91016 5:30pm
(626) 457-1800
Delegate: Jakubowski Alternate: Shepherd Romey

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG)
Attend yearly General Assembly meeting to help set agency’s course for the coming year. The General Assembly is a forum where policy matters can be identified and addressed. Any city or county representative may propose a subject for study by the Association. Each member city has one official representative and one alternate in the General Assembly.

Annual General Assembly Meeting
Usually during the summer in Palm Desert
900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 236-1993 (phone)
(213) 236-1816 (fax)
Delegate: Shepherd Romey Alternate: Jakubowski

SAN MARINO GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
As a general rule of thumb, delegate assignments in this category will be for two years, and Council Members serve as “Liaisons” to the body, not “Members” of the body.

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Empower the Committee to function independently and autonomously; serve as the point person for any questions that City staff cannot answer; handle any performance issues with committee members; participate in the selection process for new committee members. 1st and 3rd Wednesdays 7pm
Delegate: Shepherd Romey Alternate: Talt

LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Empower the Board to function independently and autonomously; serve as the point person for any questions that City staff cannot answer; handle any performance issues with trustees; participate in the selection process for new trustees.
4th Monday 8:00am
Delegate: Ude Alternate: Talt

PLANNING COMMISSION
Empower the Commission to function independently and autonomously; serve as the point person for any questions that City staff cannot answer; handle any performance issues with commissioners; participate in the selection process for new commissioners.
4th Wednesday 7pm
Delegate: Jakubowski Alternate: Huang

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION
Empower the Commission to function independently and autonomously; serve as the point person for any questions that City staff cannot answer; handle any performance issues with commissioners; participate in the selection process for new commissioners.
1st Monday 7pm
Delegate: Jakubowski Alternate: Talt

RECREATION COMMISSION
Empower the Commission to function independently and autonomously; serve as the point person for any questions that City staff cannot answer; handle any performance issues with commissioners; participate in the selection process for new commissioners.
4th Monday 7pm
Delegate: Talt Alternate: Ude

SAN MARINO BOARD OF EDUCATION
Serve as the point person for any questions that City staff cannot answer. 1665 West Drive 2nd and 4th Tuesdays
San Marino, CA 91108 7:30pm
(626) 299-7000
Delegate: Ude Alternate: Shepherd Romey

SUBJECT MATTER LIAISONS
As a general rule of thumb, delegate assignments in this category will be for two years, and Council Liaisons perform work and services as needed at the request of the City Council or staff.

BUDGET & FINANCE
Delegate: Ude Alternate: Jakubowski

DISASTER COUNCIL
Consists of two members of the City Council, the Director of Emergency Services, and a representative from the City’s Police and Fire Departments; responsible for developing the City’s emergency operations plan and mutual aid plans and agreements.

Delegate: Huang Alternate: Shepherd Romey

DIVERSITY EQUITY & INCLUSION (DEI) TASKFORCE
Delegate: Mayor Alternate: Vice Mayor

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Delegate: Ude Alternate: Jakubowski

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Delegate: Ude Alternate: Shepherd Romey

LEGISLATION & LEGAL
Delegate: Shepherd Romey Alternate: Talt
TREES
Delegate: Shepherd Romey Alternate: Huang

OTHER LIAISONS

METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT BOARD
The board is responsible for establishing and administering Metropolitan's policies and upholding the articles in the MWD Act.

Delegate: John Morris City Council Liaison: Jakubowski

METRO SAN GABRIEL VALLEY SERVICE COUNCIL
The San Gabriel Valley Council was formed in 2002, and is comprised of five elected officials and four non-elected officials nominated by LA County Supervisors Hilda Solis (1st Dist) and Kathryn Barger (5th Dist), the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (COG), and city clusters in the San Gabriel Valley, and appointed by Metro's Board of Directors. San Marino is part of the city cluster made up of Alhambra, South Pasadena, San Gabriel, and San Marino and is currently represented by San Gabriel Council Member John Harrington (term ends June 2022).
2nd Monday 5pm
Delegate: John Harrington City Council Liaison: Shepherd Romey San Gabriel Council Member

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
• Safe Community
• Well-Maintained Infrastructure
• Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security provides funding to state and local governments through the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP). In past years, the City has received several such grants to fund equipment and training for the City’s Police and Fire Departments. The SHSP is administered locally by the County of Los Angeles, whose approval authority determines how much each city will receive and what may be purchased with the grant funds. The funds are distributed after the City executes a formal Subrecipient Agreement (SRA) with the County, completes the authorized purchases or training, and submits a claim for reimbursement.

DISCUSSION
The County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors has accepted the 2019 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) selection for the Los Angeles County Operational Area and received requisite State approvals to proceed with the allocation of funds to program recipients. In order to facilitate this effort, the County of Los Angeles requires an SRA with the City of San Marino, which outlines the requirements of the grant and provides guidelines for SHSP reimbursement of eligible expenses related to portable automated license plate readers (ALPR). The SRA was approved at TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: John N. Incontro, Police Chief
Timothy Tebbetts, Police Commander
Mark Siegfried, Accounting Manager/Controller
DATE: January 12, 2022
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS THROUGH VIGILANT SOLUTIONS, LLC USING 2019

STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

the February 10, 2021 City Council meeting and awarded the City $51,789 to cover the costs associated with the purchase of portable ALPRs.

This amount is in addition to the $70,199 that was approved as part of the 2018 SHSP Grant which purchased three ALPR devices that are in use. The City also currently leases 22 ALPR cameras that are deployed throughout the City. Portable license plate readers provide another tool for the Police Department to provide a safe community. These ALPR devices will be mounted on two new police vehicles. As the officers patrol the city in their vehicles, the devices will be reading license plates to obtain information concerning stolen or wanted vehicles.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
There will be no impact to the General Fund as this is a reimbursement grant. The County of Los Angeles and the State of California, upon receipt of goods by the City of San Marino Police Department, will process a reimbursement. Reimbursement is expected to take 90-120 days. No further appropriations are needed as the $51,789 was included as part of FY 2021-22 Capital Equipment Budget.

Based on bids received by various vendors who provide ALPRs that are similar to the models that are already in use by the Police Department, staff recommends pursuing ALPRs from Vigilant Solutions, LLC. Below is a summary of the bids that were received.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the staff report as to legal form.

Vendor Name
Cost for 2 3-Camera ALPRs + 5
Years of Hosting Notes
Vigilant Solutions, LLC $ 51,738.05
Leonardo 57,123.00 *
NDI Recognition Systems N/A **
Genetec N/A **
Coban Technologies/Safe Fleet N/A **
* Quote Does Not Include Sales Tax and the City is responsible for paying sales tax of 9.5%.

The City would also incur setup charges and additional yearly migration fees to transfer data into the LEARN system that the Police Department uses for the 3 ALPRs already in place. ** Company was non-responsive and did not provide a bid after numerous attempts

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council authorize the purchase of six ALPR cameras to be deployed in two patrol vehicles with five (5) years of data hosting offered through the State of California FY2019 Homeland Security Grant Program in an amount not to exceed $51,789 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to authorize the purchase of six ALPR cameras with 5 years of data hosting from Vigilant Solutions, LLC offered through the reimbursable State of California FY2019 Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) in an amount not to exceed $51,789.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) Subrecipient Agreement Grant Year 2019

2. Vigilant Solutions, LLC Invoice

3. Vigilant Solutions, LLC Sole Source Letter

4. Federal Debarment Listing Review of Sam.Gov

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

State Homeland Security Program
Subrecipient Agreement
Grant Year 2019
Between the
County of Los Angeles
and the
City of San Marino

SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

AND THE

CITY OF SAN MARINO
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the County of Los Angeles, a political subdivision of the State of California (the "County of Los Angeles"), and the City of San Marino, a public agency (the "Subrecipient").

WITNES S ETH
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) through the Office of Grants and Training (G&T), has provided financial assistance for the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP), Assistance Listings Number (formerly Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number ) 97.067 - Homeland Security Grant Program directly to the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) for the 2019 SHSP, FAIN #EMW-2019-SS-00035, Federal Award dated September 26, 2019 with a performance period of September 1, 2019 to May 31, 2022. This Federal Award is not a R&D award; and WHEREAS, the Cal OES provides said funds to the County of Los Angeles (DUNS #052238763) as its Subgrantee, and the Chief Executive Office (CEO) is responsible for managing and overseeing the SHSP funds that are distributed to other specified jurisdictions within Los Angeles County; and
WHEREAS, this financial assistance is being provided to the Subrecipient in order to address the unique equipment, training, organization, exercise and planning needs of the Subrecipient, and to assist the Subrecipient in building effective prevention and protection capabilities to prevent, respond to, and recover from threats or acts of terrorism; and
WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles as Subgrantee has obtained approval of the 2019 SHSP grant from Cal OES in the total amount of $10,655,569.00; and WHEREAS, the CEO now wishes to distribute 2019 SHSP grant funds to the Subrecipient in the amount of $51,789.00, as further detailed in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the CEO is authorized to enter into subrecipient agreements with cities providing for re-allocation and use of these funds; and to execute all future amendments, modifications, extensions, and augmentations relative to the subrecipient agreements, as necessary; and

NOW, THEREFORE, the County of Los Angeles and Subrecipient agree as follows:
§101. Parties to this Agreement

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION
The parties to this Agreement are:

A. County of Los Angeles, a political subdivision of the State of California, having its principal office at Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration, 500 West Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; and
B. City of San Marino a public agency, having its principal office at 2200 Huntington Drive San Marino. CA 91108
§ 102. Representatives of the Parties and Service of Notices A. The representatives of the respective parties who are authorized to administer this Agreement and to whom formal notices, demands and communications must be given are as follows:

1. The representative of the County of Los Angeles is, unless otherwise stated in this Agreement:

Craig Hirakawa, HSGP Grants Director
Chief Executive Office, LAC
500 West Temple Street, Room 8-79-2
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 97 4-1127
Fax: (213) 687-3765
chirakawa@ceo. lacounty .gov
Giles Quan
Chief Executive Office, LAC
500 West Temple Street, Room 8-79-2
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 974-2319
Fax: (213) 687-3765
[email protected]

2. The representative of Subrecipient is:

Name and Title: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
Organizational DUNS City of San Marino DUNS #102565483 Number Address: 2200 Huntington Drive
City/State/Zip: San Marino, CA 91108
Phone: 626-300-0700
FAX:

Email: [email protected]
With a copy to:

Name and Title: John N. lncontro, Chief of Police
Address: 2200 Huntington Drive
City/State/Zip: San Marino, CA 91108
Phone: 626-300-0700
FAX: 626-300-0709
Email: [email protected]
B. Formal notices, demands and communications to be given hereunder by either party must be made in writing and may be effected by personal delivery, regular U.S. Postal mail service and/or e-mail. In the event of personal delivery or email, the message will be deemed communicated upon receipt by the County of Los Angeles. In the event of mail service, the message will be deemed communicated as of the date of mailing.

C. If the name and/or title of the person designated to receive the notices, demands or communications or the address of such person is changed, written notice must be given, in accord with this section, within five (5) business days of said change.

§103. Independent Party
Subrecipient is acting hereunder as an independent party, and not as an agent or employee of the County of Los Angeles. An employee of Subrecipient is not, and will not be deemed, an employee of the County of Los Angeles by virtue of this Agreement, and Subrecipient must so inform each employee organization and each employee who is hired or retained under this Agreement. Subrecipient must not represent or otherwise hold out itself or any of its directors, officers, partners, employees, or agents to be an agent or employee of the County of Los Angeles by virtue of this Agreement.
§104. Conditions Precedent to Execution of This Agreement Subrecipient must provide the following signed documents to the County of Los Angeles, unless otherwise exempted:

A. Certification and Disclosure Regarding Lobbying, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof, in accordance with §411 .A. 14 of this Agreement.

Subrecipient must also file a Disclosure Form at the end of each calendar quarter in which there occurs any event requiring disclosure or which materially affects the accuracy of the information contained in any Disclosure Form previously filed by Subrecipient.

B. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions, attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof, as required by Executive Order 12549 in accordance with §411.A.12 of this Agreement.

C. Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace, attached hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof, in accordance with §411.A.13 of this Agreement.

D. Certification of Grant Assurances, attached hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof, in accordance with §411. C of this Agreement.

SECTION II

TERM AND SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
§201. Performance Period
The performance period of this Agreement is from September 1, 2019 to February 28, 2022, unless the County of Los Angeles, with Cal OES approval, provides written notification to the Subrecipient that the performance period has been extended, in which case the performance period wlll be so extended by such written notification, as provided in §502, below.

§202. Use of Grant Funds
A. Subrecipient and the County of Los Angeles have previously completed a mutually approved budget/expenditure plan, hereinafter "Budget," for the 2019 SHSP, which has been approved by Cal OES. This information is contained in a copy of the Final Grant Award Letter and Project Worksheet, attached hereto as Exhibit E.

Any request by Subrecipient to modify the Budget must be made in writing with the appropriate justification and submitted to CEO for approval. If during the County of Los Angeles review process, additional information or documentation is required, the Subrecipient will have ten (10) business days to comply with the request. If the Subrecipient does not comply with the request, CEO will issue written notification indicating that the requested modification will not be processed. Modifications must be approved in writing by the County of Los Angeles and Cal OES during the term of this Agreement. Upon approval, all other terms of this Agreement will remain in effect.

Subrecipient must utilize grant funds in accordance with all Federal regulations and State Guidelines.

B. Subrecipient agrees that grant funds awarded will be used to supplement existing funds for program activities, and will not supplant (replace) non-Federal funds.

C. Subrecipient must review the Federal Debarment Listing at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/pages/public/searchRecords/search.jsf prior to the purchase of equipment or services to ensure the intended vendor is not listed and also maintain documentation that the list was verified.

D. Prior to the purchase of equipment or services utilizing a sole source contract or the receipt of single bid response of $250,000.00 or more, justification must be presented to CEO, who upon review will request approval from Cal OES. Such approval in writing must be obtained prior to the commitment of funds.

E. Subrecipient must provide any certifications or reports requested by the County of Los Angeles to the CEO indicating Subrecipient's performance under this Agreement, including progress on meeting program goals. Reports must be in the form requested by the County of Los Angeles, and must be provided by the fifteenth (15th) of the following month. Subrecipient is required to complete any survey requests requested by the County of Los Angeles. Subrecipient must also submit completed Project Claims for reimbursement immediately or a minimum on a quarterly basis, and no later than the date stated in §201, above.

F. Subrecipient must provide an electronic copy of their Annual Single Audit Report, as required by 2 CFR Part 200, to CEO no later than March 31st (fiscal year ending June 30) or June 30th (fiscal year ending September 30) of the year following the reporting period.

G. Subrecipient may be monitored by the County of Los Angeles on an annual basis to ensure compliance with Cal OES grant program requirements. The County of Los Angeles anticipates that said monitoring may include, at a minimum, one onsite visit during the term of this Agreement. Monitoring will utilize a Review Instrument (sample attached hereto as Exhibit H, and subject to periodic revisions) to evaluate compliance.

H. Subrecipient must provide Corrective Action Plan(s) to CEO within thirty (30) days of any audit finding.

I. Subrecipient use of the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System's Motorola Solutions, Incorporated Land Mobile Radio System Contract to purchase equipment is unallowable unless the Subrecipient can clearly demonstrate to CEO it meets one of the four federal exceptions to necessitate a noncompetitive procurement before issuance of any contract, amendment, or purchase order.

J. Subrecipient shall not use grant funds to purchase, extend, or renew any Telecommunications and Video Surveillance services and equipment as substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system which the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with Director of National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an owned, controlled by, or connected to the People's Republic of China such as and not limited to Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities); or Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).

K. Any equipment acquired pursuant to this Agreement must be authorized in the G& T Authorized Equipment List (AEL) available on line at https://www.fema.gov/authorized-equipment-list and the Funding Guidelines of the 2019 SHSP Notice of Funding Opportunity, incorporated by reference, and attached hereto as Exhibit F. Subrecipient must provide the CEO a copy of its most current procurement guidelines and follow its own procurement requirements as long as they meet or exceed the minimum Federal requirements and any added Cal OES requirements. Federal procurement requirements for the 2019 SHSP can be found at Title 2 CFR Part 200.313.

Any equipment acquired or obtained with Grant Funds:

1. Will be made available under the California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement in consultation with representatives of the various fire, emergency medical, hazardous materials response services, and law enforcement agencies within the jurisdiction of the applicant;

2. Will be consistent with needs as identified in the State Homeland Security Strategy and will be deployed in conformance with that plan;

3. Will be made available pursuant to applicable terms of the California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement and deployed with personnel trained in the use of such equipment in a manner consistent with the California Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Plan or the California Fire Services and Rescue Mutual Aid Plan.

L. Equipment acquired pursuant to this Agreement will be subject to the requirements of Title 2 CFR Part 200.313. For the purposes of this subsection, "Equipment" is defined as tangible nonexpendable property, having a useful life of more than one year which costs $5,000.00 or more per unit. Items costing less than $5,000.00, but acquired under the "Equipment" category of the Grant must also be listed on any required Equipment Listing.

1. Equipment must be used by Subrecipient in the program or project for which it was acquired as long as needed, whether or not the project or program continues to be supported by Federal funds. When no longer needed for the original program or project, the Equipment may be used in other activities currently or previously supported by a Federal agency.

2. Subrecipient must make Equipment available for use on other like projects or programs currently or previously supported by the Federal Government, providing such use will not interfere with the work on the projects or program for which it was originally acquired. First preference for other use must be given to other programs or projects supported by the awarding agency.

3. An Equipment Listing must be maintained listing each item of Equipment acquired with SHSP funds. The Equipment Listing must be kept up to date at all times. Any changes must be recorded in the Listing within ten (10) business days and the updated Listing is to be forwarded to the County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller (A-C) Shared Services Division.

The Equipment Property Records must be maintained that include: (a) a description of the property, (b) a serial number or other identification number, (c) the source of property, (d) who holds title, (e) the acquisition date, (f) and cost of the property, (g) percentage of Federal participation in the cost of the property, (h) the location, (i) use and condition of the property, U) and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Records must be retained by the subrecipient pursuant to Title 2, Part 200.313 (d) (1) of the CFR.

4. All Equipment obtained under this Agreement must have an appropriate identification decal affixed to it, and, when practical, must be affixed where it is readily visible.

5. A physical inventory of the Equipment must be taken by the Subrecipient and the results reconciled with the Equipment Listing at least once every two years or prior to any site visit by State or Federal auditors or County of Los Angeles monitors. The Subrecipient is required to have on file a letter certifying as to the accuracy of the Equipment Listing in the frequency as above, and provide to the CEO when requested.

M. Any Planning paid pursuant to this Agreement must conform to the guidelines as listed in Exhibit F or subsequent grant year programs.

N. Any Organization activities paid pursuant to this Agreement must conform to the guidelines as listed in Exhibit F.

0. Any Training paid pursuant to this Agreement must conform to the guidelines as listed in Exhibit F, and must be first submitted to CEO and then pre-authorized by Cal OES. A catalog of federally approved and sponsored training courses is available at https://www.firstrespondertraining.gov/frts/.

P. Any Exercise paid pursuant to this Agreement must conform to the guidelines as listed in Exhibit F. Detailed Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program Guidance is available at https://www.fema.gov/hseep.

Q. Any Personnel activities paid pursuant to this Agreement must conform to the guidelines as listed in Exhibit F.

R. Subrecipient must provide to CEO a spending plan detailing the required steps and timeframes required to complete the approved projects within the grant timeframe. Subrecipient must submit the spending plan to CEO prior to final execution of the Agreement.

S. Pursuant to this Agreement, indirect costs are not reimbursable.

SECTION Ill

PAYMENT
§301. Payment of Grant Funds and Method of Payment
A The County of Los Angeles will reimburse Subrecipient up to the maximum grant amount of $51,789.00 as expenditures are incurred and paid by Subrecipient and all documentation is reviewed and approved by County of Los Angeles. All expenditures must be for the purchase of equipment, exercises, trainirig, organization, and planning as described in Section II of this Agreement. The grant amount represents the amount allocated to Subrecipient in the 2019 SHSP Grant Award Letter from Cal OES.

B. Subrecipient must submit reimbursement requests to the County of Los Angeles A-C Shared Services Division requesting payment as soon as a Project is completed and expenses are incurred and paid with the required supporting documentation; submission can be sent immediately or at a minimum on a quarterly basis, and no later than the date stated in §201, above. Each reimbursement request must be accompanied by the Reimbursement Form (sample attached hereto as Exhibit G, and subject to periodic revisions). All appropriate back-up documentation must be attached to the reimbursement form, including the method of procurement, bid documentation, purchase orders, invoices, report of goods received, and proof of payment.

For Training reimbursements, Subrecipient must include a copy of the class roster verifying training attendees, proof that prior approval was obtained from Cal OES and that a Cal OES Feedback number has been assigned to the course, and timesheets and payroll registers for all training attendees.

For Exercise reimbursements, Subrecipient must enter the After Action Report (AAR) and Improvement Plan on the State Office of Domestic Preparedness secure portal within sixty (60) days following completion of the exercise and submit proof of prior State approval of the AAR with the reimbursement request.

For Planning reimbursements, Subrecipient must include a copy of the final tangible product.

C. The County of Los Angeles may, at its discretion, reallocate unexpended grant funds to another subrecipient. Said reallocation may occur upon approval by the County of Los Angeles of a Subrecipient reimbursement submission, inquiry from the County of Los Angeles to the Subrecipient regarding fund utilization, or by written notification from the Subrecipient to the County of Los Angeles that a portion of the grant funds identified in §301.A., above, will not be utilized. As provided in §502, below, any increase or decrease in the grant amount specified in §301.A., above, may be effectuated by a written notification by the County of Los Angeles to the Subrecipient.

D. Payment of reimbursement request will be withheld by the County of Los Angeles until the County of Los Angeles has determined that Subrecipient has turned in all supporting documentation and completed the requirements of this Agreement.

E. It is understood that the County of Los Angeles makes no commitment to fund this Agreement beyond the terms set forth herein.

F. 1. Funding for all periods of this Agreement is subject to continuing Federal appropriation of grant funds for this program. In the event of a loss or reduction of Federal appropriation of grant funds for this program, the Agreement may be terminated, or appropriately amended, immediately upon notice to Subrecipient of such loss or reduction of Federal grant funds.

2. County of Los Angeles will make a good-faith effort to notify Subrecipient, in writing, of such non-appropriation at the earliest time.

SECTION IV

STANDARD PROVISIONS
§401. Construction of Provisions and Titles Herein
All titles or subtitles appearing herein have been inserted for convenience and do not, and will not be deemed to, affect the meaning or construction of any of the terms or provisions hereof. The language of this Agreement will be construed according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against either party. §402. Applicable Law. Interpretation and Enforcement
Each party's performance hereunder must comply with all applicable laws of the United States of America, the State of California, and the County of Los Angeles.

This Agreement will be enforced and interpreted, as applicable, under the laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the County of Los Angeles.

If any part, term or provision of this Agreement is held void, illegal, unenforceable, or in conflict with any law of a Federal, State or Local Government having jurisdiction over this Agreement, the validity of the remainder of the Agreement will not be affected thereby.

Applicable Federal or State requirements that are more restrictive will be followed.
§403. Integrated Agreement
This Agreement sets forth all of the rights and duties of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and replaces any and all previous agreements or understandings, whether written or oral, relating thereto. This Agreement may be amended only as provided for herein.
§404. Breach
If any party fails to perform, in whole or in part, any promise, covenant, or agreement set forth herein, or should any representation made by it be untrue, any aggrieved party may avail itself of all rights and remedies, at law or equity, in the courts of law. Said rights and remedies are cumulative of those provided for herein except that in all events, no party may recover more than once, suffer a penalty or forfeiture, or be unjustly compensated.

§405. Prohibition Against Assignment or Delegation
Subrecipient may not do any of the following, unless it has first obtained the written permission of the County of Los Angeles:

A. Assign or otherwise alienate any of its rights hereunder, including the right to payment; or
B. Delegate, subcontract, or otherwise transfer any of its duties hereunder. §406. Permits
Subrecipient and its officers, agents and employees must obtain and maintain all permits and licenses necessary for Subrecipient's performance hereunder and must pay any fees required therefor. Subrecipient further certifies that it will immediately notify the County of Los Angeles of any suspension, termination, lapse, non-renewal or restriction of licenses, certificates, or other documents. §407. Nondiscrimination and Affirmative Action
Subrecipient must comply with the applicable nondiscrimination and affirmative action provisions of the laws of the United States of America, the State of California, and the County of Los Angeles. In performing this Agreement, Subrecipient must not discriminate in its employment practices against any employee or applicant for employment because of such person's race, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, age, physical handicap, mental disability, marital status, domestic partner status or medical condition.

Subrecipient must comply with Executive Order 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Part 60).

If required, Subrecipient must submit an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan to the Department of Justice Office of Civil Rights in accordance with guidelines listed at https://www.justice.gov/crt.

Any subcontract entered into by the Subrecipient relating to this Agreement, to the extent allowed hereunder, will be subject to the provisions of this §407 of this Agreement.
§408. Indemnification
Each of the parties to this Agreement is a public entity. This indemnity provision is written in contemplation of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California, which impose certain tort liability jointly upon public entities, solely by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement, and the parties agree that this indemnity provision will apply and will be enforceable regardless of whether Section 895 et seq. is deemed to apply to this Agreement. The parties hereto, as between themselves, consistent with the

authorization contained in Government Code Sections 895.4 and 895.6 agree to each assume the full liability imposed upon it or upon any of its officers, agents, or employees by law, for injury caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in the performance of this Agreement, to the same extent that such liability would be imposed in the absence of Government Code Section 895.2.

To achieve the above-stated purpose, each party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other party for any liability arising out of its own negligent acts or omissions in the performance of this Agreement (i.e., the Subrecipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the County of Los Angeles for liability arising out of the Subrecipient's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions and the County of Los Angeles agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Subrecipient for liability arising out of the County of Los Angeles' negligent or wrongful acts or omissions). Each party further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other party for liability that is imposed on the other party solely by virtue of Government Code Section 895.2. The provisions of Section 2778 of the California Civil Code are made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Subrecipient certifies that it has adequate self-insured retention of funds to meet any obligation arising from this Agreement.
§409. Conflict of Interest
A The Subrecipient covenants that none of its directors, officers, employees, or agents may participate in selecting, or administrating, any subcontract supported (in whole or in part) by Federal funds where such person is a director, officer, employee or agent of the subcontractor; or where the selection of subcontractors is or has the appearance of being motivated by a desire for personal gain for themselves or others such as family business, etc.; or where such person knows or should have known that:

1. A member of such person's immediate family, or domestic partner or organization has a financial interest in the subcontract;

2. The subcontractor is someone with whom such person has or is negotiating any prospective employment; or

3. The participation of such person would be prohibited by the California Political Reform Act, California Government Code §87100 et seq. if such person were a public officer, because such person would have a "financial or other interest" in the subcontract.

8. Definitions:

1. The term "immediate family" means domestic partner and/or those persons related by blood or marriage, such as husband, wife, father, mother, brother, sister, son, daughter, father in law, mother in law, brother in law, sister in law, son in law, daughter in law.

2. The term "financial or other interest" means:

a. Any direct or indirect financial interest in the specific contract, including but not limited to, a commission or fee, a share of the proceeds, prospect of a promotion or of future employment, a profit, or any other form of financial reward.
b. Any of the following interests in the subcontractor ownership:
partnership interest or other beneficial interest of five percent or more; ownership of five percent or more of the stock; employment in a managerial capacity; or membership on the board of directors or governing body.

C. The Subrecipient further covenants that no officer, director, employee, or agent may solicit or accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from any actual or potential subcontractor, supplier, a party to a sub agreement, (or persons who are otherwise in a position to benefit from the actions of any officer, employee, or agent).

D. The Subrecipient may not subcontract with a former director, officer, or employee within a one year period following the termination of the relationship between said person and the Subrecipient.

E. Prior to obtaining the County of Los Angeles' approval of any subcontract, the Subrecipient must disclose to the County of Los Angeles any relationship, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, of the Subrecipient or any of its officers, directors or employees or their immediate family with the proposed subcontractor and its officers, directors or employees.

F. For further clarification of the meaning of any of the terms used herein, the parties agree that references are made to the guidelines, rules, and laws of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, and Federal regulations regarding conflict of interest.

G. The Subrecipient warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give to any third person any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

H. The Subrecipient covenants that no member, officer or employee of Subrecipient may have interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or subcontract or the proceeds thereof for work to be performed in connection with this project during his/her tenure as such employee, member or officer or for one year thereafter.

I. The Subrecipient must incorporate the foregoing subsections of this Section into every agreement that it enters into in connection with this grant and must substitute the term "subcontractor" for the term "Subrecipient" and "sub subcontractor'' for "Subcontractor".

§410. Restriction on Disclosures
Any reports, analyses, studies, drawings, information, or data generated as a result of this Agreement are to be governed by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code Sec. 6250 et seq.).
§411. Statutes and Regulations Applicable To All Grant Contracts A Subrecipient must comply with all applicable requirements of State, Federal, and County of Los Angeles laws, executive orders, regulations, program and administrative requirements, policies and any other requirements governing this Agreement. Subrecipient must comply with applicable State and Federal laws and regulations pertaining to labor, wages, hours, and other conditions of employment. Subrecipient must comply with new, amended, or revised laws, regulations, and/or procedures that apply to the performance of this Agreement.

These requirements include, but are not limited to:

1. CFR
Subrecipient must comply with Title 2 CFR Part 200.

2. Single Audit Act
Since Federal funds are used in the performance of this Agreement, Subrecipient must, as applicable, adhere to the rules and regulations of the Single Audit Act (31 USC Sec. 7501 et seq.), 2 CFR Part 200 and any administrative regulation or field memos implementing the Act.

3. Americans with Disabilities Act

4. Subrecipient hereby certifies that, as applicable, it will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act 42, USC §§12101 et seq., and its implementing regulations. Subrecipient will provide reasonable accommodations to allow qualified individuals with disabilities to have access to and to participate in its programs, services and activities in accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Subrecipient will not discriminate against persons with disabilities nor against persons due to their relationship to or association with a person with a disability. Any subcontract entered into by Subrecipient, relating to this Agreement, to the extent allowed hereunder, will be subject to the provisions of this paragraph.

Political and Sectarian Activity Prohibited
None of the funds, materials, property or services provided directly or indirectly under this Agreement may be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office. Neither may any funds provided under this Agreement be used for

5. any purpose designed to support or defeat any pending legislation or administrative regulation. None of the funds provided pursuant to this Agreement may be used for any sectarian purpose or to support or benefit any sectarian activity.

Subrecipient must file a Disclosure Form at the end of each calendar quarter in which there occurs any event requiring disclosure or which materially affects the accuracy of any of the information contained in any Disclosure Form previously filed by Subrecipient. Subrecipient must require that the language of this Certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers and that all subcontractors certify and disclose accordingly.

Records Inspection
At any time during normal business hours and as often as either the County of Los Angeles, the U.S. Comptroller General or the Auditor General of the State of California may deem necessary, Subrecipient must make available for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. The County of Los Angeles, the U.S.

Comptroller General and the Auditor General of the State of California have the authority to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from records, including all Subrecipient's method of procurement, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement.

Subrecipient agrees to provide any reports requested by the County of Los Angeles regarding performance of this Agreement.

6. Records Maintenance
Records, in their original form, must be maintained in accordance with requirements prescribed by the County of Los Angeles with respect to all matters specified in this Agreement. Original forms are to be maintained on file for all documents specified in this Agreement. Such records must be retained for a period five (5) years after termination of this Agreement and after final disposition of all pending matters. "Pending matters" include, but are not limited to, an audit, litigation or other actions involving records. The County of Los Angeles may, at its discretion, take possession of, retain and audit said records. Records, in their original form pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement, must at all times be retained within the County of Los Angeles unless authorization to remove them is granted in writing by the County of Los Angeles.

7. Subcontracts and Procurement
Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Federal, State and County of Los Angeles standards in the award of any subcontracts. For

purposes of this Agreement, subcontracts include but are not limited to purchase agreements, rental or lease agreements, third party agreements, consultant service contracts and construction subcontracts.

Subrecipient must, as applicable, ensure that the terms of this Agreement with the County of Los Angeles are incorporated into all Subcontractor agreements. The Subrecipient must submit all Subcontractor agreements to the County of Los Angeles for review prior to the release of any funds to the Subcontractor. The Subrecipient must withhold funds to any Subcontractor agency that fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and their respective Subcontractor agreement.

8. Labor

9. Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed requirements for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System Personnel Administration (5 CFR 900, Subpart F).

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the provisions of the DavisBacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7); the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §874); the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327-333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction subagreements; and the Hatch Act (5 USC §§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328).

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. §201) regarding wages and hours of employment.

None of the funds may be used to promote or deter union/labor organizing activities. CA Gov't Code Sec. 16645 et seq.

Civil Rights
Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§1681- 1683, and 1685- 1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disabilities; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive

Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to non-discrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; (j) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s} that may apply to the application; and (k) P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance.

10. Environmental
Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and Ill of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646), which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally-assisted programs.

These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases.

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; ( d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93- 523); (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93205); and (i) Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 §102(a) (P.L. 93-234).

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.), which prohibits the

use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.), which restores and maintains the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation's waters.

Subrecipient must, as applicable, ensure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision that are utilized in the accomplishment of this project are not listed in the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Federal Grantor agency of the receipt of any communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under consideration for listing by the EPA.

By signing this Agreement, Subrecipient warrants and represents that it will, as applicable, comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (P.L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 871).

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the provision of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (P.L. 97-348) dated October 19, 1982 (16 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.) which prohibits the expenditure of most new Federal funds within the units of the Coastal Barrier Resources System. 11 . Preservation
Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-1 et seq.).

12. Suspension, Debarment, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with Title 2 CFR Part §3000, regarding Suspension and Debarment, and Subrecipient must submit a Certification Regarding Debarment, attached hereto as Exhibit B, required by Executive Order 12549 and any amendment thereto. Said Certification must be submitted to the County of Los Angeles concurrent with the execution of this Agreement and must certify that neither Subrecipient nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department head or agency. Subrecipient must require that the language of this Certification be included in the

award documents for all sub-award at all tiers and that all subcontractors certify accordingly.

13. Drug-Free Workplace
Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, 41 USC §701, Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part §17; the California Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990, CA Gov't Code §§8350-8357, and Subrecipient must complete the Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements, attached hereto as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by reference. Subrecipient must require that the language of this Certification be included in the award documents for all sub-award at all tiers and that all subcontractors certify accordingly.

14. Lobbying Activities
Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with 31 U.S.C.1352 and complete the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, (0MB 0038-0046), attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference.

15. Miscellaneous
Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966, as amended (P.L. 89-544, 7 USC §§2131 et seq.).

B. Statutes and Regulations Applicable To This Particular Grant Agreement Subrecipient must comply with all applicable requirements of State and Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, program and administrative requirements, policies and any other requirements governing this particular grant program.

Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with new, amended, or revised laws, regulations, and/or procedures that apply to the performance of this Agreement.

These requirements include, but are not limited to:

Title 2 CFR Part 200; EO 12372; U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness, Office for Domestic Preparedness, ODP WMD Training Course Catalogue; and DOJ Office for Civil Rights.

Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) requirements as stated in the California Emergency Services Act, Government Code Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2, §8607.1 (e) and CCR Title 19, §§2445-2448.

Provisions of Title 2, 6, 28, 44 CFR applicable to grants and cooperative agreements, including Part 18, Administrative Review Procedures; Part 20, Criminal Justice Information Systems; Part 22, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Statistical Information; Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems

Operating Policies; Part 30, Intergovernmental Review of Department of Justice Programs and Activities; Part 35, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services; Part 38, Equal Treatment of Faith-based Organizations; Part 42, Nondiscrimination/Equal Employment Opportunities Policies and Procedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act; Part 63, Floodplain Management and Wetland Protection Procedures; Part 64, Floodplain Management and Wetland Protection Procedures; Federal laws or regulations applicable to Federal Assistance Programs; Part 69, New Restrictions on Lobbying; Part 70, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements (including sub-awards) with Institutions of Higher Learning, Hospitals and ct.her Non-Profit Organizations; and Part 83, Government-Wide Requirements for a Drug Free Workplace (grants).

Nondiscrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789(d), or the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; the provisions of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, M7100.1, and all other applicable Federal laws, orders, circulars, or regulations.

1. Travel Expenses
Subrecipient, as provided herein, will be compensated for Subrecipient's reasonable travel expenses incurred in the performance of this Agreement, to include travel and per diem, unless otherwise expressed.

Subrecipient's total travel for in-State and/or out-of-State and per diem costs must be included in the contract budget(s). All travel, including outof-State travel, that is not included in the budget(s) will not be reimbursed without prior written authorization from the County of Los Angeles.

Subrecipient's administrative-related travel and per diem reimbursement costs will not be reimbursed. For programmatic-related travel costs, Subrecipient's reimbursement rates may not exceed the amounts established under the grant.

C. Compliance With Grant Requirements
To obtain the grant funds, the State required an authorized representative of the County of Los Angeles to sign certain promises regarding the way the grant funds would be spent. These requirements are included in Exhibit F and in the State's "Grant Assurances". By signing these Grant Assurances and accepting Exhibit F, the County of Los Angeles became liable to the State for any funds that are used in violation of the grant requirements. The State's Grant Assurances are incorporated into this Agreement through Exhibit D.

Subrecipient will be liable to the Granter for any funds the State determines the Subrecipient used in violation of these Grant Assurances.

Pursuant to this Agreement, Subrecipient shall execute the 2019 Certification of Grant Assurances in Exhibit D, accepting and agreeing to abide by all provisions, assurances, and requirements therein. Subrecipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the County of Los Angeles for any sums the State or Federal government determines Subrecipient used in violation of the Grant Assurances.

To the extent Exhibit D conflicts with language or provisions contained in this Agreement, or contains more restrictive requirements under Federal and State law, Exhibit D shall control.

D. Noncompliance With Grant Requirements
Subrecipient understands that failure to comply with any of the above assurances and requirements, including Exhibit D, may result in suspension, termination or reduction of grant funds, and repayment by the Subrecipient to the County of Los Angeles of any unauthorized expenditures. §412. Federal. State and Local Taxes
Federal, State and local taxes are the responsibility of the Subrecipient as an independent party and not of the County of Los Angeles and must be paid prior to requesting reimbursement. However, these taxes are an allowable expense under the grant program.
§413. Inventions. Patents and Copyrights
A. Reporting Procedure for Inventions
If any project produces any invention or discovery ("Invention") patentable or otherwise under Title 35 of the U.S. Code, including, without limitation, processes and business methods made in the course of work under this Agreement, the Subrecipient must report the fact and disclose the Invention promptly and fully to the County of Los Angeles. The County of Los Angeles will report the fact and disclose the Invention to the State. Unless there is a prior agreement between the County of Los Angeles and the State, the State will determine whether to seek protection on the Invention. The State will determine how the rights in the Invention, including rights under any patent issued thereon, will be allocated and administered in order to protect the public interest consistent with the policy ("Policy") embodied in the Federal Acquisition Regulations System, which is based on Ch. 18 of Title 35 U.S.C. Sections 200 et seq. (Pub. L. 95-517, Pub. L. 98-620, Title 37 CFR Part 401 ); Presidential Memorandum on Government Patent Policy to the Heads of the Executive Departments and Agencies, dated 2/18/1983); and Executive Order 12591, 4/10/87, 52 FR 13414, Title 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 220 (as amended by Executive Order 12618, 12/22/87, 52 FR 48661, Title 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 262). Subrecipient hereby agrees to be bound by the Policy, and will contractually require its personnel to be bound by the Policy.

B. Rights to Use Inventions
As applicable, County of Los Angeles will have an unencumbered right, and a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to use, manufacture, improve upon, and allow others to do so for all government purposes, any Invention developed under this Agreement.

C. Copyright Policy

1. Unless otherwise provided by the State or the terms of this Agreement, when copyrightable material ("Material") is developed under this Agreement, the County of Los Angeles, at its discretion, may copyright the Material. If the County of Los Angeles declines to copyright the Material, the County of Los Angeles will have an unencumbered right, and a nonexclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license, to use, manufacture, improve upon, and allow others to do so for all government purposes, any Material developed under this Agreement.

2. The State will have an unencumbered right, and a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license, to use, manufacture, improve upon, and allow others to do so for all government purposes, any Material developed under this Agreement or any Copyright purchased under this Agreement.

3. Subrecipient must comply with Title 24 CFR 85.34.

D. Rights to Data
The State and the County of Los Angeles will have unlimited rights or copyright license to any data first produced or delivered under this Agreement. "Unlimited rights" means the right to use, disclose, reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform and display publicly, or permit others to do so; as required by Title 48 CFR 27.401. Where the data are not first produced under this Agreement or are published copyrighted data with the notice of 17 U.S.C. Section 401 or 402, the State acquires the data under a copyright license as set forth in Title 48 CFR 27.404(f)(2) instead of unlimited rights. (Title 48 CFR 27.404(a)).

E. Obligations Binding on Subcontractors
Subrecipient must require all subcontractors to comply with the obligations of this section by incorporating the terms of this section into all subcontracts. §414. Child Support Assignment Orders
Under the terms of this Agreement, Subrecipient must, as applicable, comply with California Family Code Section 5230 et seq.

§415. Minority. Women. And Other Business Enterprise Outreach Program It is the policy of the County of Los Angeles to provide Minority Business Enterprises, Women Business Enterprises and all other business enterprises an equal opportunity to participate in the performance of all Subrecipient's contracts, including procurement, construction and personal services. This policy applies to all of the Subrecipient's contractors and sub-contractors. §416. Compliance with Fair Chance Employment Practices
Subrecipient shall comply with fair chance employment hiring practices set forth in California Government Code Section 12952, Employment Discrimination:

Conviction History. Subrecipient's violation of this paragraph of the Agreement t may constitute a material breach of the Agreement. In the event of such material breach, County of Los Angeles may, in its sole discretion, terminate the Agreement.
§417. Method of Payment and Required Information
The County of Los Angles may, at its sole discretion, determine the most appropriate, efficient, secure, and timely form of payment provided under this Agreement. Subrecipient further agrees that the default form of payment shall be Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) or Direct Deposit, unless an alternative method of payment is deemed appropriate by the A-C.

Subrecipient shall provide the A-C with electronic banking and related information for the Subrecipient and/or any other payee that the Subrecipient designates to receive payment pursuant to this Agreement at https://directdeposit.lacounty.qov/. Such electronic banking and related information includes, but is not limited to: bank account number and routing number, legal business name, valid taxpayer identification number or TIN, a working e-mail address capable of receiving remittance advices and other payment related correspondence, and any other information that the A-C determines is reasonably necessary to process the payment and comply with all accounting, record keeping, and tax reporting requirements.

Any provision of law, grant, or funding agreement requiring a specific form or method of payment other than EFT or Direct Deposit shall supersede this requirement with respect to those payments. At any time during the duration of this Agreement, the Subrecipient may submit a written request for an exemption to this requirement and must be based on specific legal, business or operational needs and explain why the payment method designated by the A-C is not feasible and an alternative is necessary. The A-C, in consultation with CEO, shall decide whether to approve exemption requests.

SECTION V

DEF AUL TS, SUSPENSION, TERMINATION, AND AMENDMENTS
§501. Defaults
Should either party fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this Agreement within the time specified by this Agreement, the non-breaching party reserves the right to terminate the Agreement, reserving all rights under State and Federal law.
§502. Termination
This Agreement may be terminated, in whole or in part, from time to time, when such action is deemed by the County of Los Angeles, in its sole discretion, to be in its best interest. Termination of work hereunder shall be effected by notice of termination to the Subrecipient specifying the extent to which performance of work is terminated and the date upon which such termination becomes effective.

The date upon which such termination becomes effective shall be no less than ten (10) days after the notice is sent.
§503.Amendments
Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, any change in the terms of this Agreement, including changes in the services to be performed by Subrecipient, that are agreed to by the Subrecipient and the County of Los Angeles must be incorporated into this Agreement by a written amendment properly signed by persons who are authorized to bind the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease of the grant amount specified in §301.A., above, or any extension of the performance period specified in §201, above, does not require a written amendment, but may be effectuated by a written notification by the County of Los Angeles to the Subrecipient.
§601. Complete Agreement

SECTION VI

ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement contains the full and complete Agreement between the two parties. Neither verbal agreement nor conversation or other communication with any officer or employee of either party will affect or modify any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

§602. Number of Pages and Attachments
This Agreement may be executed utilizing wet, scanned digital, and electronic signatures, each of which is deemed to be an original. This Agreement includes (26) pages and (8) Exhibits which constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the parties.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank}

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Subrecipient and County of Los Angeles have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
BY�fL
Chief Executive Officer
sv,�V"
CELlAVALA
Executive Officer, Board of Supervisors

APPROVED AS TO FORM
RODRIGO A. CASTRO-SILVA
County Counsel
BY f1J: Deputy County Counsel
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY
City Attorn
ATTEST
svJ;f.,ft!!L=
Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D.
(Print Name)
Stephanie Cao
(Print Name)
Christina Baker
(Print Name)
,0jlt/21Jll
Date
February 17, 2021
Date
�/lB/U'�f
Date

EXHIBITS
Exhibit A Certification and Disclosure Regarding Lobbying Exhibit B Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions
Exhibit C Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Exhibit D Certification of Grant Assurances
Exhibit E Final Grant Award Letter and Project Worksheet Exhibit F 2019 Notice of Funding Opportunity
Exhibit G Reimbursement Form and Instructions
Exhibit H Review Instrument

Ccl 06S2-232
Approved by 0MB 0348-0046

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL,

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether sub-awardee or prime Federal recipient, at the initiation or receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. The filing of a form is required for each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Use the SF-LLL-A Continuation Sheet for additional information if the space on the form is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report. Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information.

1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the outcome of a coveted Federal action.

2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action.

3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a follow-up report caused by a material change to the information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action.

4. Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or sub-award recipient. Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1st tier. Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants.

5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks “Subawardee,” then enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known.

6. Enter the name of the Federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard.

7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments.

8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request for Proposal (RFP) number: Invitation for Bid (IFB) number: sub-grant announcement number: the contract, subgrant, or loan award number: the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Include prefixes, e.g.,”RFP-DE-90-OO1

9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5.

DIsclosure of Lobbying Activities -cal QES 2-232 (Revised 7/8/2013)

Cal OES 2-232
Approvec by OMO 0348-0045

10. f a.) Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the coveted Federal action. (b.) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 30 (a). Enter Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial (MI).

11. Enter the amount of compensation paid or reasonably expected to be paid by the reporting entity (item 4) to the lobbying entity (item 10). Indicate whether the payment has been made (actual) or will be made (planned). Check all boxes that apply. If this is a material change report, enter the cumulative amount of payment made or planned to be made.

12. Check the appropriate box(es). Check all boxes that apply. If payment is made through an inkind contribution, specify the nature and value of the in-kind payment.

13. Check the appropriate box(es). Check all boxes that apply. If other, specify nature.

14. Provide a specific and detailed description of the services that the lobbyist has performed, or will be expected to perform, and the date(s) of any services rendered. Include all preparatory and related activity, not just time spent in actual contact with Federal officials. Identify the Federal official(s) or employee(s) contacted or the officer(s), employee(s), or Member(s) of Congress that were contacted.

15. Check whether or not a SF-LLL-A Continuation Sheet(s) is attached.

36. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number.

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, D.C. 20503.

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - cal DES 2-232 (Revised 7/8/2013)

EXHIBIT A
ti OPS 2.232
Approved by 0MB 0348-0D46

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
Comolete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:

E1 a. contract E1 a. bid/offer/application . initial !ilin9, e b. grant b. initial award . ma eria g c. cooperative agreement c. post-award For Material Change Only: d. loan e, loan guarantee Year Quarter f. loan insurance
date of last report

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, .‘ u Enter Name and Address of Prime:
vP iI%j..) l’ri,j
County of Los Angeles
t . Chief Executive Office - HSGA Prime Subawardee 500 West Temple Street, Room 8-79-2 < ii - .Q. Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tier, If known: ti.) 13
Congressional District, if known: Congressional District, if known:

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

Department of Homeland Security Homeland Security Grant Program CFDA Number, if applicable 97.067

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known: ç 1, 7 ‘

10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity b. Individuals Performing Services (if individual, last name, first name, Ml): (last name first name Ml - include address if different from 1 Da) (attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary) ‘c+ i1/4

11. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) : 13. Type of Payment (check all that apply):
t’/ A — Actual j Planned a. retainer

12. Form of Payment (check all that apply): J b. one-time fee ] a. cash j c. commission
J b. in-kind; specify: I U. contingent fee
] e. deferred
nature value I N/ ... f. other; specify.

14. Brief Description of Services Performed otto be Performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or Member(s) contacted, for Payment indicated in item 11: (attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary)

15. Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A attached: ,) Yes No

16. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 37 U.S.C. Section 1352. Signature:

This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when this transaction was made or entered into. Name ‘“ -
This disclosure is required pursuant to 37 U S C. 1352. This information will be Title: C I T1.( Ha-wA TL reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any Telephone person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not (as cop) less than $10,000 and not more than $100000 for each such failure. Date: .f f(,2 Federal Use Only: Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Form — LLL
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities -Cal OES 2-232 (Revised 7/812013)

Approved by 0MB 0348-0046

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

CONCONTINUATION SHEET
Continuation of 10 a-b: additional sheets may be added if necessary Reporting Entity:

Last Name First Name MI
Address City Zip
Last Name First Name MI
Address City Zip
Last Name First Name Ml
Address City Zip
Last Name First Name MI
Address City Zip
Continuation of 14: (additional sheets may be added if necessary) Brief Description of Services and Payments indicated in item 11:

Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Form — LLL-A
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - Cal QES 2-232 (Revised 7/8/2013)

11 IDI V•

CERTIFICATION REGARDING

DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION

LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS
This certification is required by the regulations Implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and SuspensIon, 24 CFR Part 24 Section 24,510, Participants’ responsibilities.
(READ ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION BEFORE

COMPLETING)

1. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency.

2. Where the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

AGREEMENT NUMBER
C

CONTRACTORIBORROWER)AGENCY
‘P C,i lcr
NAME AND TITLE OF AUT[1ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
DAf”
/

EXHIBIT C

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION
STD. 21
COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: C i T Or — ‘] (‘1 -‘
The
matters
contractor or grant recipient named above hereby certifies compliance with Government Code Section 8355 in relating to providing a drug-free workplace. The above-named contractor or recipient will:

1. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a).

2. employees
Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b), to inform about all of the following:
(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
(b) The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, (C) Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs, and (U) Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.

3. Provide as requited by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the proposed contract or subgrant:
(a) Will receive a copy of the company’s drug-free policy statement, and (b) Will agree to abide by the terms of the company’s statement as a condition of employment on the contract or subg rant.

CERTIFICATION
described
I, the official named below, hereby swear that I am duly authorized legally to bind the contractor or Recipient to the above certification.
penalty
I am fully aware that this certification, executed on the date and in the county below, is made under of perjury under the laws of the State of California.

HA PA /d
OFFICAL’S NAME DATE EXECUTED
Lc

EXECUTED IN THE COUNTY OF
-CONTRACTOR or RECEI%INT SIGNATURE
Ct
TITLE
93—-- ooo7S3
FEDERAL I.D NUMSER
Drug-Free Workplace Certification STD. 21 (Revised 7/2015)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this document, the prospective recipient of Federal assistance is providing the certification as set out below.
2, The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds knowingly tendered an erroneous certification, In addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/ar debarment.

3. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this agreement Is entered, at any time the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds learns that its certification was erroneous, when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms “covered transaction,” ‘debarred,” “suspended,’ “Ineligible,’ “lower tier covered transaction,” ‘participant,” “person, “primary covered transaction,” ‘principal,” ‘proposal,’ and “voiuntarliy excluded,’ as used in this clause, have the meanings set out In the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules Implementing Executive Order 12549.

5. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who Is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily exduded from participation on this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds further agrees by submitting this proposal that It wiil Include the clause titled Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for iower tier covered transactions.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant In a lower tier covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of Its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the j of Parties Excluded from Procurement or Non Procurement Programs.

8. NothIng contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to tender in good faith the certification requited by this dause.

The knowledge and information of a participant is not reqtAred to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person In the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under Paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant In a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower Her covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntary excluded form participation in this transaction, In addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies Including suspension and/or debarment.

STATEMENT ON THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
To comply with the enactment of Senate Bill 1120, (Chapter 1770, Statutes of 7990), which established the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990, the C (-ry L1 4t...i 174 R ‘s-’ (your agency)
accordingly provides this statement of compliance.

In order to maintain funding eligibility, state agencies, along with those in receipt of grant and contractual awards, must certify that they provide drug-free workplaces and have issued drug-free workplace statements to their employees (Section 8355(a) of the Government Code]. Consequently, in accordance with this directive, this statement is issued to meet this requirement.

The C7 C ‘1(youragency), an agency within the State of California has adopted this statement in compliance with legislation which addresses issues to avoid the dangers arising from drug and alcohol abuse in the workplace. These dangers include death and injury to the employee, co-workers, or the public resulting from accidents, dereliction of duty, poor judgment and carelessness. Substance abuse also results in lost productivity, reduced efficiency, and increased absenteeism by the substance abuser and interferes with the job performance of employees who do not use illegal or unauthorized substances. [Section 8355(b)(7)] California law prohibits the unlawful manufacture, dispensation, possession, or illegal use of a controlled substance. That prohibition extends to all places and includes the worksite of California state employees. [Section 8355(a)] Employees convicted of a violation of criminal drug statute, when the violation occurred at an employee’s worksite, shall report the conviction to the granting and monitoring State agency upon conviction. (Section 8356(a)(1)(2)] In the event of the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or illegal use of a controlled substance at a State worksite, the State may take disciplinary action pursuant to the law and/or require the satisfactory completion of a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program. [Section 2355(b)(4)] The Employee Assistance Program (EAP) provides drug problem assessment and referral to appropriate counseling and rehabilitation services. The EAP is available to all agency employees. Procedures exist to ensure the confidentiality of EAP records. Contact your personnel office for further information.

It is the intent of the (yotir agency) to ensure by execution of this statement of compliance that each emptoyee shall abide by the terms of this drug-free workplace statement. [Section 8355(c)] Drug-Free Workplace Certification STD. 21 (Revised 7/2015)

EXHIBIT D
Cal OES

OOVENQRS OFIC
OF EMER6ENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES Federal Grant Programs
As the duly authorized representative of the Applicant, I hereby certify that the Applicant has the legal authority to apply for federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay any non-federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project described in this application, within prescribed timelines.

I further acknowledge that the Applicant is responsible for reviewing and adhering to all requirements within the:
(a) Applicable Federal Regulations (see below);
(b) Federal Program Notice of Funding Opportunity fNOFO); (c) Federal Preparedness Grants Manual;
(d) California Supplement to the NOFO; and
(e) Federal and State Grant Program Guidelines.

Federal Regulations
Government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements, and audit requirements for federal grant programs are set forth in Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). Updates are issued by the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) and can be found at http://www.whitehouse.qov/omb/.

Significant state and federal grant award requirements (some of whIch appear in the documents listed above) are set forth below. The Applicant hereby agrees to comply with the following:

1. Proof of Authority
The Applicant will obtain written authorization from the city council, governing board, or authorized body in support of this project. This written authorization must specify that the Applicant and the city council, governing board, or authorized body agree:
(a) To provide all matching funds required for the grant project and that any cash match will be appropriated as required;
(b) Any liability arising out of the performance of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the Applicant and the city council, governing board, or authorized body;
(c) Grant funds shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by the city council, governing board, or authorized body; and
(U) The official executing this agreement is, in fact, authorized to do so. 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 1 of 14 Initials
_____

cat c’s , GOVERNOWS OFFICE
F FI4ERaENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES Federal Grant Programs
This Proof of Authority must be maintained on file and readily available upon request.

2. Period of Performance
The Applicant will initiate work after approval of the award and complete all work within the period of performance specified in the grant.

3. Lobbying and Political Activities
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), for persons entering into a contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement from an agency or requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the Applicant certifies that:
(a) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence on officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
fb) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying”, in accordance with its instructions.
(c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

The Applicant will also comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. § 1501- 1508 and § 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with federal funds. 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 2 of 14 lnitials/(

I Cal OES
OOVERNQR’ QFFIC
D EIR6ENCY S!RVICS
Standard Assurances
for All Cal OES federal Grant Programs
Finally, the Applicant agrees that federal funds will not be used, directly or indirectly, to support the enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy without the express written approval from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) or the federal awarding agency.

4. Debarment and Suspension
As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 C.F.R. § 200.213 and codified in 2 C.F.R. Part 180, Debarment and Suspension, the Applicant will provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the federal government.

The Applicant certifies that it and its principals, recipients, or subrecipients:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud cia criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making talse statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (2)(b) of this certification; and (U) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transaction (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.

Where the Applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application.

5. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity
The Applicant will comply with all federal statutes relating to non-discrimination.

These include, but are not limited to, the following:
7 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 3 of 14 Initials )\)\‘1

Cal OES OOVRNOR’S OFFICE

UF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES Federal Grant Programs
(a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law (P.C.) 88-352 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et. seq.) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin and requires that recipients of federal financial assistance take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) to their programs and services:
(b) Title IX of the Education Amendments ot 1972, (20 U.S.C. § 1681-1 683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded educational program or activity;
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination against those with disabilities or access and functional needs;
(d) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability and requires buildings and structures be accessible to those with disabilities and access and functional needs (42 U.S.C. § 12101- 122 13):
(e) Age Discrimination Act of 1975, (42 U.S.C. § 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age:
(f) Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. § 290 dd—2), relating to confidentiality of patient records regarding substance abuse treatment; (g) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing as implemented by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at 24 C.F.R. Part 100. The prohibition on disability discrimination includes the requirement that new multifamily housing with four or more dwelling units—i.e., the public and common use areas and individual apartment units fall units in buildings with elevators and ground-floor units in buildings without elevators)— be designed and constructed with certain accessible features (See 24 C.E.R. § 100.201); (h) Executive Order 11246, which prohibits federal contractors and federally assisted construction contractors and subcontractors, who do over $10,000 in Government business in one year from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification or national origin;
(I) Executive Order 11375, which bans discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identitication, or national origin in hiring and employment in both the United States federal workforce and on the part of government contractors;
(j) California Public Contract Code § 10295.3, which prohibits discrimination based on domestic partnerships and those in same sex marriages; //// 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 4 of 14 lnitialy i/L,(

Cal OES GOVERNOR’S OFIC
OF EMFRENY SfRVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES federal Grant Programs
fk) DHS policy to ensure the equal treatment of faith-based organizations, under which all applicants and recipients must comply with equal treatment policies and requirements contained in 6 C.F.R. Part 19;
(I) Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for federal assistance is being made; and
(m)Ihe requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.

In addition to the items listed in (a) through (m), the Applicant will comply with California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). FEHA prohibits harassment and discrimination in employment because of ancestry, familial status, race, color, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding), gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, mental and physical disability, genetic information, medical condition, age, pregnancy, denial of medical and family care leave, or pregnancy disability leave (California Government Code §12940, 12945, 12945.2), military and veteran status, and/or retaliation for protesting illegal discrimination related to one of these categories, or for reporting patient abuse in tax supported institutions.

6. Drug-free Workplace
As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.), the Applicant certifies that it will maintain a drug-free workplace and a drug-free awareness program as outlined in the Act.

7. Environmental Standards
The Applicant will comply with state and federal environmental standards, which may be prescribed pursuant to the following, as applicable:
(a) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code § 21000- 21177), to include coordination with the city or county planning agency;
(b) CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6.

Chapter 3, § 15000- 15387);
Cc) Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), which establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters; 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 5 of 14 Initials
______

1vCal OES
,J GOVRNOR1 OFIC
OF £HERGENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES Federal Grant Programs
(d) Federal Clean Air Act 011955 (42 U.S.C. § 7401) which regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources;
(e) Institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 011969 (P.C. 91-190); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA; and Executive Order 12898 which focuses on the environmental and human health effects of federal actions on minority and low-income populations with the goal of achieving environmental protection for all communities;
ft) Evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with Executive Order 11988;
(g) Executive Order 11514 which sets forth notional environmental standards; (h) Executive Order 1 1 738 instituted to assure that each federal agency empowered to enter into contracts for the procurement of goods, materials, or services and each federal agency empowered to extend federal assistance by way of grant, loan, or contract shall undertake such procurement and assistance activities in a manner that will result in effective enforcement of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Executive Order 11990 which requires preservation of wetlands; (I) The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, (P.L. 93-523); (j) The Endangered Species Act of 1973, (P.L. 93-205);
(k) Assurance of project consistency with the approved state management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. § 1451 et seq.);
(I) Conformity of Federal Actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.);
(m)Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivets system.

The Applicant shall not be: 1) in violation of any order or resolution promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution district; 2) subject to a cease and desist order pursuant to § 13301 of the California Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions; or 3) determined to be in violation of federal law relating to air or water pollution. 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 6 of 14 initials
_____

Cal OES
p GOVERNOS GFICE

P EUERENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES Federal Grant Programs

8. Audits
For subrecipients expending $750,000 or mote in federal grant funds annuahy, the Applicant will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart F Audit Requirements.

9. Access to Records
In accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.336, the Applicant will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the state, through any authorized representative, access to and the tight to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award. The Applicant will require any subrecipients, contractors, successors, transterees and assignees to acknowledge and agree to comply with this provision.

10. Conflict of Interest
The Applicant will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain.

11. financial Management
False Claims for Payment -The Applicant will comply with 31 U.S.C § 3729-3733 which sets torth that no subrecipient, recipient, or subrecipient shall submit a false claim tot payment, reimbursement or advance.

12. Reporting - Accountability
The Applicant agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA] (P.L. 109-282), specifically (a) the reporting of subawards obligating $25,000 or more in federal funds and fb) executive compensation data for first-tier subawards. This includes the provisions of FFAIA, which includes requirements for executive compensation, and also requirements implementing the Act for the non-federal entity at 2 C.F.R. Part 25 Financial Assistance Use of Universal Identifier and Central Contractor Registration and 2 C.F.R. Part 170 Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information.

13. Whistleblower Protections
The Applicant also must comply with statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. § 2409,41 U.S.C. § 4712, and 10 U.S.C. § 2324,41 U.S.C. § 4304and4310. 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 7 of 14 Initials
_____

I wriI 1
jCat OES .,
oovRNoR’s QFFICF
OF EUEPGFXCY SRVICF5
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES federal Grant Programs

14. Human Trafficking
The Applicant will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the TraffickinQ Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7104) which prohibits grant award recipients or a subrecipient from: (1) engaging in trafficking in persons during The period of time that the award is in effect (2) procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect; or (3) using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award.

15. Labor Standards
The Applicant will comply with the following federal labor standards:
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. § 276a to 276a-7). as applicable, and the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145 and 18 U.S.C. § 874) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. § 327-333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction contracts or subcontracts, and (b) The Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 201 et al.) as they apply to employees of institutes of higher learning (IHE), hospitals and other non-profit organizations.

16. Worker’s Compensation
The Applicant must comply with provisions which require every employer to be insured to protect workers who may be injured on the job at all times during the performance of the work of this Agreement, as per the workers compensation laws set forth in California Labor Code § 3700 et seq.

17. Property-Related
If applicable to the type of project funded by this federal award, the Applicant will:
(a) Comply with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property AcQuisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.C. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of federal participation in purchase; (b) Comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(o) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.C. 93-234) which requires subrecipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more; /
2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 80114 Initials
_____

!L1 c 1OES
p OOVERNOWS OFFC
OF ERFNCY SERV1CE
Standard Assurances
for All Cal OES federal Grant Programs
(c) Assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 otthe (d) National Historic Preservation Act ot 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470), Executive Order 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 ti 6 U.S.C. §469o-1 et seq.); and
(e) Comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. § 4831 and 24 CER Part 35) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.

18. Certifications Applicable Only to Federally-funded Construction Projects For all construction projects, the Applicant will:
(a) Not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the federal awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project; (b) Comply with the requirements of the awarding agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications; and (c) Provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the complete work conforms with the approved plans and specifications and will furnish progressive reports and such other information as may be requited by the assistance awarding agency or State.

19. Use of Cellular Device While Driving is Prohibited
Applicants are required to comply with California VehicTe Code sections 23123 and 23123.5. These laws prohibit driving motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication. Drivers are also prohibited from the use of a wireless telephone without hands-free listening and talking, unless to make an emergency call to 911, law enforcement, or similar services.
2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 9 of 14 lnitials

H ‘1 Cal OES
:1 GOVERNOR’S OFC€

OF EMERBENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal QES Federal Grant Programs

20. California Public Records Act and Freedom of Information Act The Applicant acknowledges that all information submitted in the course of applying for funding under this program, or provided in the course of an entity’s grant management activities that are under Federal control, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the California Public Records Act, California Government Code section 6250 et seq. The Applicant should consider these laws and consult its own State and local laws and regulations regarding the release of information when reporting sensitive matters in the grant application, needs assessment, and strategic planning process.

HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) —

PROGRAM SPECIFIC ASSURANCES / CERTIFICATIONS

21. Reporting Accusations and Findings of Discrimination It during the past three years the recipient has been accused of discrimination on any basis the recipient must provide a list of all such proceedings, pending or completed, including outcome and copies of settlement agreements to the DHS Financial Assistance Office and the DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) by e-mail at [email protected] or by mail at U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Building 410, Mail Stop #0190, Washington, D.C. 20528.

In the courts or administrative agencies make a finding of discrimination on grounds of race, color, national origin (including LEP), sex, age, disability, religion, or familial status against the recipient, or the recipients settle a case or matter alleging such discrimination, recipients must forward a copy of the complaint and findings to the DHS Financial Assistance Office and the CRCL by e-mail or mail at the addresses listed above.

The United States has the tight to seek judicial enforcement of these obligations.

22. Acknowledgment of Federal Funding from DHS
All recipients must acknowledge their use ot federal funding when issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid invitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with federal funds. 20]9 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 10 of 14 Initials //

Cal OES I GOVERNORS OFFICE

OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal QES Federal Grant Programs

23. Activities Conducted Abroad
All recipients must ensure that project activities carried on outside the United States are coordinated as necessary with appropriate government authorities and that appropriate licenses, permits, or approvals are obtained.

24. Best Practices for Collection and Use of Personally Identifiable Information (P11) DHS defines personally identifiable information (P11) as any information that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information that is linked or linkable to that individual. All recipients who collect P11 are required to have a publically-available privacy policy that describes standards on the usage and maintenance of P11 they collect. Recipients may also find the DHS Privacy Impact Assessments: Privacy Guidance and Privacy template a useful resource respectively.

25. Copyright
All recipients must affix the applicable copyright notices of 1 7 u.S.C. § 401 or 402 and an acknowledgement of U.S. Government sponsorship (including the award number) to any work first produced under federal financial assistance awards.

26. Duplication of Benefits
Any cost allocable to a particular federal financial assistance award provided for in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart E may not be charged to other federal financial assistance awards to overcome fund deficiencies, to avoid restrictions imposed by federal statutes, regulations, or federal financial assistance award terms and conditions, or for other reasons. However, these prohibitions would not preclude recipients from shifting costs that are allowable under two or more awards in accordance with existing federal statutes, regulations, or the federal financial assistance award terms and conditions.

27. Energy Policy and Conservation Act
All recipients must comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 6201 which contain policies relating to energy efficiency that are defined in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with this Act.

28. federal Debt Status
All recipients are required to be non-delinquent in their repayment of any federal debt. Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowances, and benefit overpayments. See 0MB Circular A-i 29. 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 11 of 14 Initials
______

Cal OES . OOVFfiNOR’S OFFICE

OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES Federal Grant Programs

29. Fly America Act of 1974
MI recipients must comply with Preference for U.S. Flag Air Carriers: (air carriers holding certificates under 49 U.S.C. § 41102) for international air transportation of people and property to the extent that such service is available, in accordance with the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act 011974 (49 U.S.C. § 40118) and the interpretative guidelines issued by the Comptroller General of the United States in The March 31, 1981, amendment to Comptroller General Decision B138942.

30. Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990
In accordance with Section 6 of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, all Applicants must ensure that all conference, meeting, convention, or training space tunded in whole or in part with federal funds complies with the fire prevention and control guidelines of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act ot 1974, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 2225a.

31. Non-supplanting Requirement
All recipients who receive federal financial assistance awards made under programs that prohibit supplanting by law must ensure that federal funds do not replace (supplant) funds that have been budgeted for the same purpose through nonfederal sources.

32. Patents and Intellectual Property Rights
Unless otherwise provided by low, recipients ore subject to the Bayb-Dole Act, Pub. L.

No. 96-517, as amended, and codified in 35 U.S.C. § 200 et seq. All recipients are subject to the specific requirements governing the development, reporting, and disposition of rights to inventions and patents resulting from financial assistance awards located at 37 C.F.R. Part 401 and the standard patent rights clause located at37 C.F.R. § 401.14.

33. SAFECOM
All recipients who receive federal financial assistance awards made under programs that provide emergency communicafion equipment and its related activities must comply with the SAFECOM Guidance for Emergency Communication Grants, including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications.
2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 12 ot 14 lnitiolU

Cal OES GOVERNORS OPC€

OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Standard Assurances
For All Cal OES Federal Grant Programs

34. Terrorist Financing
All recipients must comply with Executive Order 13224 and US. law that prohibit transactions with, and the provisions of resources and support to, individuals and organizations associated with terrorism. Recipients are legally responsible to ensure compliance with the Order and laws.

35. Reporting of Matters Related to Recipient Integrity and Performance If the total value of the recipient’s currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all federal assistance offices exceeds $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of this federal financial assistance award, you must comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters located at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII, the full text of which is incorporated here by reference in the award terms and conditions.

36. USA Patriot Act of 2001
All recipients must comply with requirements of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act), which amends 18 U.S.C. § 175—1 75c.

37. Use of DHS Seal, Logo, and Flags
All recipients must obtain permission from their DHS Financial Assistance Office, prior to using the DHS seal(s), logos, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials, including use of the United States Coast Guard seal, logo, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of Coast Guard officials. 2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 13 of 14 Initials
_____

*1 Cal OES
y
O0VERNOP’$ OFFICE
OF EER6ENCY 5ERVICE
Standard Assurances
For AU Cal OES Federal Grant Programs

IMPORTANT
The purpose of the assurance is to obtain federal and state financial assistance, including any and all federal and state grants, loans, reimbursement, contracts, etc.

The Applicant recognizes and agrees that state financial assistance will be extended based on the representations made in this assurance. This assurance is binding on the Applicant, its successors, transferees, assignees, etc. Failure to comply with any of the above assurances may result in suspension, termination, or reduction of grant funds.

All appropriate documentation, as outlined above, must be maintained on tile by the Applicant and available for Cal OES or public scrutiny upon request. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the grant or termination of the grant or both and the subrecipient may be ineligible for award of any future grants if the Cal OES determines that any of the following has occurred: (1) the recipient has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

All of the language contained within this document must be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers. All recipients are bound by the Department of Homeland Security Standard Terms and Conditions 2018, Version 8.1, hereby incorporated by reference, which can be found at:
https://www. dhs.qov/pu blication/fy 1 5-Uhs-standard-terms-and-conditions.

The undersigned represents that he/she is authorized to enter into this agreement for and on behalf of the Applicant.

S u brecipient: Complete next page
Signature of Authorized Agent: Complete next page
Printed Name of Authorized Agent: Complete next page
Title: Complete next page Date: Complete next page
2019 HSGP Standard Assurances Page 14 of 14 lnitia

EXHIBIT 0

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
2019 CERTIFICATION OF GRANT ASSURANCES
As the duly authorized representative of the Subrecipient, I hereby certify Subrecipient’s complete acceptance of Exhibit D, and agreement to abide by all provisions, assurances, conditions and requirements of the Grant Assurances therein. 2/231 I
“City Representatverritle (Signature) (Print Name) Date

APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY Stephanie Cao February 22, 2021
City At rney (Signature) (Print Name) Date
ATTEST
BY________________
_____
Cit Perk (Sgture) (Print Name) Date
HOA 02204513 1

EXHIBIT E

GAVIN NEWSOM

GOVERNOR
Cal OES
j GOVERNOR’S OFFICE

OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
MARK S. GHILARDUCCI

DIRECTOR
September26. 2019
Sachi A. Hamai
Chief Executive Officer
Los Angeles County
500 West Temple Street, Room 713
Los Angeles, CA 90012-0000
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SUBRECIPIENT AWARD APPROVAL
Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Subaward #2019-0035, Cal OES ID#037-00000
Subaward Period of Performance: 09/01/2019-05/31/2022
Dear Ms. Hamoi:
-‘1
- C)
.1:—
The California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) approved your FY 2019 HSGP subaward in the amount of $10,655,569. Once the completed application is received and approved, reimbursement ci eligible subaward expenditures may be reque5ted using the Cal OES Financial Management Forms Workbook. Failure to provide documentation in a timely manner could result in a hold on funding, pursuant to 2 CFR § 200.338(a) and 200.207(b){1)-(2).

This subaward is subject to requirements in Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 200, including the Notice of Funding Opportunities (NOFO), the Preparedness Grants Manual, California Supplement to the NOFO, and all applicable federal, state, and local requirements. All activities funded with this subaward must be completed within the subaward period of performance.

Subrecipients must obtain additional written approval prior to incurring costs for activities such as aviation, watercraft, ailowability request logs, noncompetitive procurement, and projects requiring Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation review.
3650 SCHRIEVER AVENUE, MATHER, CA 95655
(91 6) 845-8506 TELEPHONE (91 6) 845-8511 FAX
www.CaIOES.co.gov

Sachi A. Hamai
September 26, 2019

Your organization will be required to prepare and submit The Biannual Strategy Implementation Report to Cal OES via the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Grants Reporting Tool (GRI) semi-annually for the duration of the subaward period ot performance or until all activities are completed and the subaward is formally closed. Failure to submit required reports could result in subaward reduction, suspension, or termination. Throughout the subaward cycle, milestones set in the GRI will be used as indicators of project feasibility, performance, and grant management capacity. This information may also be used in assessing proposals in future grant opportunities.

A Special Condition is placed on this subaward for any funds passed-through to any Los Angeles County governmental entity. Additional information specifying the conditions will be sent at a later time.

Your dated signature is required on this letter. Please sign and return the original to your Cal QES Program Representative within 20 calendar days upon receipt and keep a copy for your records. For further assistance, please contact your Cal QES Program Representative.

Sincerely,
dLa C
MARK S. GHILARDUCCI
Director
8ochi A. HamaL A . Date
Los Angeles County

City of San Marina
2015 SHSP Projects — - SolutlonArea L1 Project $ Project Title Funding Source Dlsciphn LEtnteroperable
Eqmests 51,789
044 Communicion HSGP-SHSP
Totals $ 51,789
Equipment
Part ofa SAFECOM funding SututlonArea5ub Deployable./ SolSource Budgeted Pro1erj S Description & Aft B Aft Title Discipline Procureinrit Hold trigger Consult Source Category Shateable Involved Cost
(Quantity) —
oaer1SQK
ALPR
- portable
and/or vehicle
mounted system
Consisting of
imaging technology
Inleroperable
No Hold
and optical Automated License 04418 030E-01-ALPR N/A HSGP-SHSP LE Communications Deployable No No Indicated $ 5789 character Plate Recognition Equipment recognition software capable of determining the
information on
license plates,

EXHIBIT F
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)
Fiscal Year 2019 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) NOTE: If you are going to apply for this funding opportunity and have obtained a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number andlor are not currently registered in the System for Award Management (SAM), please take immediate action to obtain a DUNS Number, if applicable, and then to register immediately in SAM. It may take four weeks or more after you submit your SAM registration before your registration is active in SAM, then an additional 24 hours for Grants.gov to recognize your information. Information on obtaining a BUNS number and registering in SAM is available from Grants.gov at:
http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register. html.

A. Program Descrintion
Tssued By
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Grant Programs Directorate (GPD)
Assistance Listings Number (formerly Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number)

97.067
Assistance Listings Title (formerly CFDA Title)
Homeland Security Grant Program
Notice of Funding Opportunity Title
Homeland Security Grant Program
• State Homeland Security Program
• Urban Area Security Initiative
• Operation Stonegarden
NOFO Number
DHS- I 9-GPD-067-00-02
Authorizing Authority for Program
Section 2002 ofthe Homeland Security Act of2002 (Pub. L. No. 107-296, as amended) (6 U.S.C. § 603)
Appropriation Authority for Program
Department ofHomeland Security Appropriations Act, 2019 (Pub. L. No. 116-6) Program Type
New
Program Overview, Objectives and Priorities

fY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Overview
One of the core missions of DHS/FEMA is to enhance the ability of state, territory, local, and tribal governments to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks and other disasters. DHS/FEMA’s comprehensive suite of grant programs are an important part of the Administration’s larger, coordinated effort to strengthen homeland secLirity preparedness.

The Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) is one tool among a comprehensive set of initiatives authorized by Congress and implemented by the Administration to help strengthen the Nation against risks associated with potential terrorist attacks.

The 2018-2022 FEMA Strategic Plan creates a shared vision for the field of emergency management and sets an ambitious, yet achievable, path forward to unify and further professionalize emergency management across the country. The HSGP supports the goal of Readying the Nation for Catastrophic Disasters. We invite all our stakeholders and partners to also adopt these priorities and join us in building a more prepared and resilient Nation.

Objectives
Within this broader construct, the objective ofthe FY 2019 HSGP is to provide funds to eligible entities to support state, local, tribal, and territorial efforts to prevent terrorism and other catastrophic events and to prepare the Nation for the threats and hazards that pose thc greatest risk to the security of the United States.

State Homeland Security Program (SHSP): The SHSP supports state, local, tribal, and territorial preparedness activities that address high priority preparedness gaps across all core capabilities that support terrorism preparedness.

Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI): The UASI Program assists high-threat, highdensity Urban Areas in efforts to build, sustain, and deliver the capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts ofterrorism.

Operation Stonegarden (OPSG): OPSG supports enhanced cooperation and coordination among Customs and Border Protection (CBP), United States Border Patrol (USBP), and federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies. OPSG provides funding to support joint efforts to secure the United States’ borders along routes of ingress from international borders to include travel corridors in states bordering Mexico and Canada as well as states and territories with international water borders.

Performance Metrics
Performance metrics for this program are as follows:

SI-ISP and UASI:
• Percent improvement in Stakeholder Preparedness Review (SPR) capabilities against Threat and Hazard identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) targets; and • Percent ofstates and territories with a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) and SPR that meet current DHS/FEMA guidance.

OPSG:

FY 2019 HSGP NOfO

• Percent of funding that provides intelligence-based operational support; and • Percent of funding that provides force multiplier activities across two or more state, local, or tribal law enforcement agencies.

For purposes of the SHSP and UASI program, DHS/FEMA requires states, territories, and high-risk urban areas to complete a THIRA/SPR and to prioritize grant funding to support closing capability gaps or sustaining capabilities identified in this process. Additional information on the THIRA/SPR process, including other National Preparedness System (NPS) tools and resources, can be found at https://www.fema.gov/national-prepai-edness system.

Priorities
DHS/FEMA continually assesses changes to the threat landscape to further the National Preparedness Goal (the Goal) of a secure and resilient nation. This analysis provides a perspective on critical preparedness trends for whole community partners to use to inform program priorities, allocate resources, and communicate with stakeholders about issues of shared concern. DIIS/FEMA have identified the following as national priority areas:
• Emerging Threats, including Cybersecurity
• Lifelines (more information found in this fact sheet and toolkit) • Safety and Security
• Food, Water, Sheltering
* Health and Medical
• Energy
• Communications
• Transportation
• I [azardous Material
In addition to addressing gaps identified by SPRs, recipients should consider funding projects that address the above priorities of DIlS/FEMA.

B. Federal Award Information
Award Amounts, Important Dates, and Extensions
Available Funding for the IISGP NOFO: $1,095,000,000
HSGP Programs FY 2019 Allocation
State Homeland Security Program $415,000.00
Urban Area Security Initiative $590.000,00
Operation Stonegarden $90,000,00
Total $1,095,000,000

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

FY 2019 SHSP ALLOCATIONS
Alabama $4,077.500 Montana $4,077,500
Alaska $4.077.500 Nebraska 54,077.500
American Samoa $1,000,000 Nevada $4,077,500
Arizona $4,077.500 New Hampshire 54,077.500
Arkansas $4,077,500 New Jersey $$,000.000
California $62,011,000 New Mexico $4,077,500
Colorado $4,077,500 New York $76,930,000
Connecticut $4,077,500 North Carolina $5,750,000
Delaware $4,077,500 North Dakota $4,077,500
District of Columbia $5,750,000 Northern Mariana $ 1.000,000 Florida $10,566,000 Ohio $7,000,000
Georgia $5,750,000 Oklahoma 54.077.500
Guam $1,000,000 Oregon $4,077.500
Hawaii $4,077,500 Pennsylvania $9,200,000
Idaho $4,077,500 Puerto Rico $4,077,500
Illinois $15,712,000 Rhode Island $4,077,500
Indiana $4.077,500 South Carolina $4,077.500
Iowa $4.077,500 South Dakota $4,077.500
Kansas $4,077,500 Tennessee $4.077.500
Kentucky $4,077,500 Texas $20,591,000
Louisiana $4,077,500 U.S. Virgin Islands $1,000,000
Maine $4,077,500 Utah $4,077,500
Mary land $$,000.000 Vermont $4,077,500
Massachusetts $7,000,000 Virginia $9,200,000
Michigan $5,750,000 Washington $7,000,000
Minnesota $4.077.S00 West Virginia $4,077.500
Mississippi $4,077,500 Wisconsin $4,077,500

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO
FY 2019 Statelferritory Allocation Stateerdtory FY 2019 Allocation Missouri
Total $415,000,000

FY 2019 UASI ALLOCATIONS
Fl 2019 UASI Stale/Territory Funded Urban Area Allocation Arizona Phoenix Area $4,000,000
Anaheim/Santa Ana Area $5,000,000
Bay Area $27,500,000
• Los Angeles/Long Beach Area $68,000,000 California
Riverside Area $3,250,000
Sacramento Area $3,250,000
San Diego Area $16,900,000
Colorado Denver Area $3,250,000
District of Columbia National Capital Region $52,750,000 Miami/fort Lauderdale Area $7,000,000
Florida Orlando Area $3,250,000
Tampa Area $3,250,000
Georgia Atlanta Area $6,000,000
Hawaii Honolulu Area $3,250,000
Illinois Chicago Area $68,000,000
Maryland Baltimore Area $4,000,000
Massachusetts Boston Area $16,900,000
Michigan Dctroit Area $5,000,000
Minnesota Twin Cities Area $5,000,000
Missouri St. Louis Area $3,250,000
Nevada Las Vegas Area $5,000,000
New Jersey Jersey City/Newark Area $20,050,000
New York New York City Area $178,750,000
Oregon Portland Area $3,250,000
. Philadelphia Area $16,900,000 Pennsylvania Pittsburgh Area $3,250,000 Dallas/Fort Worth/Arlington Area $16,900,000
Texas Flouston Area $24,600,000
San Antonio Area $3,250,000
Virginia on Roads Area $3,250,000
Total S590,t)00,000
Seattle Area $6,000,000
Period of Performance: 36 months
Extensions to the Period of Performance (PoP) are allowed. For additional information on PoP extensions, refer to the Preparedness Grants Manual.

PageS of 30
FY 2019 HSGP NOFO
Washington

Projected Period of Performance Start Date: September 1. 2019 Projected Period of Performance End Date: August 31, 2022 Funding Instrument: Grant
C. Eliibilitv Information
Eligible Applicants
The State Administrative Agency (SAA) is the only entity eligible to submit HSGP applications to DHS/FEMA, including those applications submitted on behalf of VAST and OPSG applicants. All 56 states and territories, including any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth ofthe Northern Mariana Islands, are eligible to apply for SHSP funds. Tribal governments may not apply directly for HSGP funding; however, funding may be available to tribes under the SHSP and OPSG through the SAA.

Eligibility Criteria
Etigible high-risk urban areas for the fY 2019 UASI program have been determined through an analysis of relative risk of terrorism faced by the 100 most populous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in the United States. Subawards will be made by the SAAs to the designated high-risk urban areas.

Eligible subrecipients under FY 2019 OPSG are local units of government at the county level or equivalent level of government and federally-recognized tribal governments in states bordering Canada or Mexico and states and territories with international water borders. All applicants must have active ongoing USBP operations coordinated through a CBP sector office to be eligible for OPSG funding.

Under FY 2019 OPSG, subrecipients eligible to apply for and receive a subaward directly from the SAAs are divided into three Tiers. Tier I entities are local units of government at the county level or equivalent and federally recognized tribal governments that are on a physical border in states bordering Canada, states bordering Mexico, and states and territories with international water borders. Tier 2 eligible subrecipients are those not located on the physical border or international water but are contiguous to a Tier 1 county. Tier 3 eligible subrecipients are those not located on the physical border or international water but are contiguous to a Tier 2 eligible subrecipient. Tier 2 and Tier 3 eligible scibrecipients may be eligible to receive funding based on border security risk as determined by the USBP.

Other Eligibility Criteria
National Incident Management System (NIMS) implementation Prior to allocation of any federal preparedness awards in FY 2019, recipients must ensure and maintain adoption and implementation of NIMS. Detailed information on NIMS requirements are in the Preparedness Grants Manual.

Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) Membership

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

In support of the Goal, recipients must belong to, be in, or act as a temporary member of EMAC, except for American Samoa and the Commonwealth ofthe Northern Mariana Islands, which are not required to belong to EMAC at this time. All assets supported in part or entirety with FY 2019 HSGP funding must be readily deployable and NIMS-typed when possible to support emergency or disaster operations per existing EMAC agreements. In addition, funding may be used for the sustainment of core capabilities that, while they may not be physically deployable, support national response capabilities such as Geographic!Geospatial Information Systems (GIS), interoperable communications systems, capabilities as defined under the mitigation mission area of the Goal, and fusion centers.

Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Activities (LETPA) Per section 2006 ofthe liTornetand Security Act of2002, as amended (6 U.S.C. § 607), DHS/FEMA is required to ensure that at least 25 percent of grant funding appropriated for grants awarded under HSGP’s authorizing statute are used for law enforcement terrorism prevention activities. DHS/FEMA meets this requirement, in part, by requiring all recipients allocate at least 25 percent of the combined RSGP funds allocated under SI-ISP and UASI towards law enforcement terrorism prevention activities, as defined in 6 U.S.C. § 607. The LETPA allocation can be from SHSP, UASI, or both. The 25 percent LETPA allocation is in addition to the 80 percent pass through requirement to local units of government and tribes, referenced below.

FY 2019 LETPA Allocations
labama $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1.01 9,375
Uaska $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1.01 9,375
merican Samoa $1,000,000 $1,000,001 $250,000
rizona hoenix Area $4,000.00f’ 54,000.00(7 $4,077,500 $8,077,500 $2,019,375 rJcansas $4,077,500 $4,077,501 $1.01 9,375
naheim/Santa Ana Area 55.000.OOt
sy Area 527,500,0CC
os Angeles/Long Beach Area $68 0000CC alifornia $123,900,001 $62,011 0CC $785.91 1001 $46,477,750 iverside Area 53.250,000
acramento Area $3250.00
an Diego Area $16,900.00
Dolorado lenver Area $3250.00 53.250.00( $4,077,500 $7,327,500 $1,831,875 annecticut $407750’ $4,077,500 $1,019,375
)elaware $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1.01 9375
)istrict of
oIumbia $5,750,000 $58,500,000 $14,625,000 .Jational Capital Region $52,750,000 $52,750,000 AiarnilFort Lauderdale Area $7,000,000
Florida )rlndo Area $3250000 $13,500,00t $10,566.00’ $24.066,00( 56,016,5CC ampa Area $3250001

fY 2019 HSGP NOFO
UASI Total UASI SHSP Total Allocation StateITerrito Funded Urban Areas) LETPA Allocation Allocation Allocation by State

Geot9a \llanta Area $6.0000QQ 56.000,00 55.750,000 $11750000 $2,937,50C texas )allastFort WorthlArl,n9ton Area 516.900:000
$24 .600.000
Guam $7,000,000 $1,000,000 $250,00C
tawas lonolulu Area 53,250.0901 $3.250,000 $4,077,500 $7,327,500 $7831675 Idaho $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1,019,375
Illinois Thicago Area $68.000O0C sea.oao,oon $1 5,712.000 $83.71 2000 $20,928,00C ndiana $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1.01 9,375
owa $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1019375
(ansas $4,077.50’ $4,077,500 $1,019,375
Kentucky $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1019375
Louisiana $4,077,500 $4077500 $1 .07 9,375
1aine $4 077,500 S4,077,500 $1,019,375
Maryland altimore Area $4000000 $4,000,000 $8,000,000 $1 2,000,000 53,000,000 Massachusetts oston Area $16900000 $16,900,000 $7,000,000 $23,900,000 $5,975,000 ,lichigan )etroit Area $5,000.00 ss,ooo,orn $5,750,000 $10,750,000 $2,687,500 Minnesota Ewin Cities Area $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,077,500 59,077,50’ $2,269,375 lississippi $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $7.01 9375
Missouri t. Louis Area 53.250 001 $3,250,000 $4,077,500 57,327,500 $1,831,675 Montana $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1,019,375
Nebraska $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1.01 9,375
Nevada as Vegas Area $5,000,001 $5,000.00’ $4,077,500 $9,077,500 $2,269,375 New Hampshire $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1.01 9,375
New Jersey ersey City/Newark Area 520.050.000 520.050.001 $8,000,000 $28,050,000 57.012,500 New Mexico $40775001 $4,077,500 $1,019,375
New York lew York City Area 5178.750.001 $178,750,001 $76,930,000t $255,680,000 $63,920,000 North Carolina $5,750,000[ $5,750,000 $1,437,500
North Dakota $4,077,500 $4,077,500 51,019375
Northern Mariana
stands $7,000,000 $1,000,000 $250,000
)hio $7000000 57,000,0I $1,750,000
Oklahoma $4,077,500 $1,019,375
Oregon ‘ortland Area 53,250,00’ 53.250,000 $4,077,5001 $7,327,500 $1,831,875 ‘hiladelphia Area $16,900,000 Pennsylvania $20 150,001 $9,200,001 $29,350,000 $7,337,500 -‘rltsburgh Area 53.250.001
Puerto Rico $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1,019,375
Rhode Island $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1,079,375
South Carolina $4,077,500 $4,077,500 51,019,375
South Dakota 54,077.500 $4,077,500 $1 019,375
Tennessee $4077500 $4,077,500 $1019 375
louston Area
$44 750,00’ $20591 Oaf $65341001 $16,335,251

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

UASI Total UASI SHSP Total Allocation StateITerrito Funded Urban Area(s) Allocation Allocation LETPA Allocation by State nr 0 Ao 33250 000
iS. Virgin Islands $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $250000
Utah $4,077,500 $4,077,501 $1,019,375
fetmont $4,077,500 $4,077,501 $101 9,375
(irgnia lampton Roads Area S3,250,00l S3,250.000 $9,200,000 $12,450,000 $3,112,500 Vashington eattIe Area $6,000,001 $6000001 $7,000,000 $13,000,001 $3,250,000 Vest Virginia $4,077,50C $4,077,501 $1,019,375
Visconsin $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $101 9,375
Vyoming $4,077,500 $4,077,500 $1,019,375
Total $590,000,000 $590,000,000 $41 5,000,000 $1,005,000,000 $251,250,000 The National Prevention Framework describes those activities that should be executed upon the discovery of intelligence or information regarding an imminent threat to the homeland, to thwart an initial or follow-on terrorist attack and provides guidance to ensure the Nation is prepared to prevent, avoid, or stop a threatened or actual act ofterrorism. Activities outlined in the National Prevention Framework are eligible for use as LETPA-focused ftinds. Also, where capabilities are shared with the protection mission area, the National Protection framework activities are also eligible. Other terrorism prevention activities proposed for funding under LETPA must be apptoved by the FEMA Administrator.

Cost Share or Match
There is no cost share or match requirement for the FY 2019 HSGP. fl Anolication and Submission Information
Key Dates and Times
Date Posted to Grants.gov: April 12, 2019
Application Submission Deadline: May 29, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. ET All applications must be received by the established deadline. The Non-Disaster (ND) Grants System has a date stamp that indicates when an application is submitted. Applicants will receive an electronic message confirming receipt ofthe hill application. DHS/FEMA will not review applications that are received after the deadline or consider them for funding. DRS/FEMA may, however, extend the application deadline on request for an applicant who can demonstrate that good cause exists to justify extending the deadline. Good cause for an extension may include technical problems outside of the applicant’s control that prevent submission ofthe application by the deadline, or other exigent or emergency circumstances.

Applicants experiencing technical issues must notify the FEMA Headquarters (HQ) Program Analyst prior to the application deadline. If applicants do not know their FEMA l-lQ Program Analyst or ifthere are programmatic qtiestions or concerns, please contact the

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Centralized Scheduling and Information Desk (CSID) by phone at ($00) 368-6498 or by e-mail at askcsidfema.dhs.gov, Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. ET.

Anticipated Funding Selection Date: August 2, 2019
Anticipated Award Date: No later than September 30, 2019 Other Key Dates
Event Suggested Deadline For Completion
Obtain DUNS Number May 1, 2019
Obtain a valid Employer May 1, 2019 IdentiFication Number (BIN) Update SAM registration May 1, 2019
Submit the initial application in May 22, 2019 Grants.gov Submit the final application in ND
Grants May 29, 2019, No later than 5:00 p.m. El
Agreeing to Terms and Conditions of the Award
Ry submitting an application, applicants agree to comply with the requirements of this NOFO and the terms and conditions ofthe award, should they receive an award.

Address to Request Application Package
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on requesting and submitting an application.

Content and Form of Application Submission
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on requesting and submitting an application.

Electronic Delivery
DHS/FEMA is participating in the Grants.gov initiative to provide the grant community with a single site to find and apply for grant funding opportunities. DI4S/FEMA requires applicants to submit their initial applications online through Grants.gev and to submit final applications through ND Grants.

How to Register to Apply through Grants.gov
See the Preparedness Giants Manual for information on requesting and submitting an application.

How to Submit an Initial Application to BUS/FEMA via Grants.gov See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on requesting and submitting an application.

Timely Receipt Requirements and Proof of Timely Submission As application submission is a two-step process, the applicant with the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) role who submitted the application will also receive an acknowledgement of receipt, a tracking number (GRANTXXXXXXXX) from Grants.gov, and an Agency Tracking Page lOof3O
FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Ntimber (EMX-2019-XX-XXXX) with the successful transmission of the initial application. This notification does not serve as proof of timely submission, as the application is not complete until it is submitted in ND Grants. All applications must be received in ND Grants by 5:00 p.m. ET on May 29, 2019. Proofoftimely submission is automatically recorded by ND Grants. An electronic date/time stamp is generated within the system when the application is successfully received by ND Grants. Additionally, the applicant(s) listed as contacts on the application will receive a system-generated email to confirm receipt.

Submitting the Final Application in Non-Disaster Grants System (ND Grants) After submitting the initial application in Grants.gov, eligible applicants will be notified by DHS/FEMA and asked to proceed with submitting their complete application package in ND Grants. Applicants can register early with ND Grants and arc encouraged to begin their ND Grants registration at the time ofthis announcement but no later than seven days before the application deadline. Early registration will allow applicants to have adequate time to start and complete their application.

In ND Grants applicants will be prompted to submit all of the information contained in the following forms. Applicants should review these forms before applying to ensure they have all the information required:
• Standard Form 424A, Budget Information (Non-construction); • Standard Form 4243, Standard Assurances (Non-construction); and • Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.

In addition, applicants must submit copies ofthe following in ND Grants:
• Investment Justification (the Investment Justification Template may be found in the Related Documents Tab ofthe Grants.gov posting and used as a preparation tool; responses to questions in the Template are entered into the GRT);
• List of Urban Area Working Group (UAWG) and Senior Advisory Committee (SAC) members;
• SAC charter;
• UAWG charter; and
• Indirect Cost Agreement, if requesting indirect costs. If there is no current indirect cost agreement, then the applicant must contact the Federal Cognizant Agency to negotiate a rate and notify the relevant HQ Program Analyst or Grants Management Specialist.

Applicants must submit copies of the following in ND Grants if applying for construction projects. The forms may be accessed in the Forms tab under SF-424 Family on Grants.zov:
• Standard Form 424C, Budget Information (Construction); and • Standard Form 424D, Standard Assurances (Construction).

Applicants needing assistance registering for the ND Grants system should contact ndgrants(fema.gov or (800) 865-4076.

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

HSGP Specific Application Instructions
Development of the Investment Justification (SHSP and UASI) As part ofthe FY 2019 HSGP application process for SHSP and UASI funds, applicants mtist develop formal investment justifications (lJs) that address the proposed investments.

Each IJ must demonstrate how proposed investments:
• Support terrorism preparedness;
• Support closing capability gaps or sustaining capabilities identified in the community’s THIRA/SPR process; and
• Engage and/or impact the whole community, including children, older adults, pregnant women, and individuals with limited English proficiency, individuals with disabilities and others with access and functional needs, and ensure the protection of civil rights in the building, sustainment, and detivery of core capabilities.

Each IJ must explain how the proposed investments wilt support the applicant’s efforts to:
• Prevent a threatened or an actual act ofterrorism;
• Prepare for all hazards and threats, while explaining the nexus to terrorism preparedness; • Protect citizens, residents, visitors, and assets against the greatest threats and hazards, relating to acts ofterrorism; and/or
• Respond quickly to save lives, protect property and the environment, and meet basic human needs in the aftennath of an act ofterrorism or other catastrophic incidents.

Development of Investments and Projects (SHSP)
• Applicants must propose at least two and may include up to ten investments. • Within each investment in their Li, applicants must propose at least one project to describe the activities they plan to implement with SHSP funds. There is no limit to the number of projects that may be submitted.
• Any projects funded with ST-ISP funds that are not included in the application must subsequently be included in the first Biannual Strategy implementation Report (BSIR).

For further information on the BSIR, see the Preparedness Grants Manual. • Of the proposed SHSP-funded investments, one single investment must be in support of a designated fusion center. Recipients must coordinate with the fusion center when developing a fusion center investment prior to submission. See additional information on how to develop fusion center investments below.
• Ofthe proposed SHSP-funded investments, as introduced in FY 2018, at least one investment must be in support of the state or territory’s cybersecurity efforts.

Consistent with the terms of this NOFO and the Preparedness Grants Manual, Recipients and subrecipients must ensure SHSP funds for cybersecurity projects achieve target capabilities related to preventing, preparing for, protecting against, or responding to acts of terrorism. Such projects may simultaneously support enhanced preparedness for other hazards unrelated to acts ofterrorism. Recipients and subrecipients of FY 2019 grant awards will be required to complete the 2019 Nationwide Cybersecurity Review (NCSR), enabling agencies to benchmark and measure progress of improving their cybersccurity posture. The Chief Information

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Officer (ClO), Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or equivalent for each recipient and subrecipient should complete the NCSR. Ifthere is no ClO or CISO, the most senior cybersecurity professional should complete [he assessment. The NCSR is available at no cost to the user and takes approximately 2-3 hours to complete. The 2019 NCSR will be open from October— December 2019. Although this is only a requirement for recipients and subrecipients of fY 2019 SHSP hinds, all SLTT agencies with preparedness responsibilities are highly encouraged to participate and complete the 2019 NCSR to evaluate their cybersecurity posture. for detailed information and background on the NCSR, please see Information Bulletin 439. • The name of the cybersecurity IJ must include the word “Cybersecurity” to easily identify the required cybersecurity investment.
• All emergency communications investments must describe how such activities align with their Statewide Communication Interoperable Plan (SCIP). Recipients must coordinate with their Statewide Interoperability Coordinator (SWIC) and/or Statewide lnteroperability Governance Body (SIGB) when developing an emergency communications investment prior to submission to ensure the project supports the statewide strategy to improve emergency communications and is compatible and interoperable with surrounding systems. The investment name must include the words “emergency communications” to easily identify any emergency communications investments.
• Projects should describe how the proposed investment supports closing capability gaps or sustaining capabilities identified in the THIRA/SPR process. • All requested funding must be associated with specific projects. F or each project, several pieces of information must be provided to submit the project for consideration in the application, incitiding the name of the project, the project description, the name of the subrecipient, if applicable, the recipient type (e.g., state or local), the project location (zip code of the primary location ofthe project), the primary core capability the project supports, and whether the project activities are shareable and deployable.

Development of Investments and Projects (UASI)
• Applicants must propose at least two and may include up to ten investments. • Within each investment in their Ii, Urban Areas must propose at least one project to describe the activities they are planning to implement with UASI funds. There is no limit to the number of projects that may be submitted. Any projects funded with UASI funds that are not included in the application must subsequently be included in the first BSIR. for further information on the BSIR, see the PreDaredness Grants Manual. • Ofthe proposed 10 investments, Urban Areas are required to propose one single investment in support of a designated fusion center within the Urban Area, if applicable.

Recipients must coordinate with the fusion center when developing a fusion center investment prior to submission. See additional information on how to develop fusion center investments below.
• Ofthe proposed UASI-funded investments, at least one investment must be in support of the tirban area’s cybersecurity efforts. Cybersecurity investments must support the security and functioning of critical infrastructure and core capabilities as they relate to

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

achieving target capabilities related to preventing, preparing for, protecting against, or responding to acts of terrorism. Recipients and subrecipients of FY 2019 grant awards will be reqtiired to complete the 2019 Nationwide Cybersecurity Review (NCSR), enabling agencies to benchmark and measure progress of improving their cybersecurity posture. The ClO, CISO or equivalent for each recipient shoti]d complete the NCSR. If there is no ClO or CISO, the most senior cybersecurity professional should complete the assessment. The NCSR is available at no cost to the user and takes approximately 2- 3 hours to complete. The 2019 NCSR will be open from October— December2019.

Although this is only a requirement for recipients and subrecipients of FY 2019 UASI hinds, all SLTT agencies with preparedness responsibilities are highly encouraged to participate and complete the 2019 NCSR to evaluate their cybersecurity posture. For detailed information and background on the NCSR, pleasc see Information Bulletin 439. • If UASI funds are used by the state in support of the Urban Area, the SAA mctst, as part of the tist of proposed investments, describe how those hinds will directly support the Urban Area.
• All emergency communications investments must describe how such activities align to the SCIP. Recipients must coordinate with the SWIC and/or SIGB when developing an emergency communications investment prior to submission to ensure the project supports the statewide strategy to improve emergency communications and is compatible and interoperabte with surrounding systems. The investment name must include the words “emergency communications” to easily identify any emergency communications investments.
• Projects should describe how the proposed investment supports closing capability gaps or sustaining capabilities identified in the TRIRA/SPR process. Applicants that completed the THJRA/SPR in 20] 8 should refer to that assessment to identif’ gaps and sustainment needs related to Response, Recovery, and cross-cutting capabilities. They should refer to their 2017 THIRA/SPR for gaps and sustainment needs related to the other core capabilities. Applicants that did not complete the Tl-IIRA/SPR in 201$ should refer to their most recent THIRA/SPR.
• All requested funding must be associated with specific projects. For each project, several pieces of information must be provided to submit the project for consideration in the application, including the name of the project, the project description, the name of the subrecipient, if applicable, the recipient type (e.g., state or local), the project location (zip code ofthe primary location ofthe project), the primary core capability the project supports, and whether the project activities are shareable and deployable.

Development of fusion Center Investments (SHSP and UASI) If applicable, each IJ must include and identifi a fLtsion center investment that will:
• Indicate alignment to a designated Fusion Center.
• Provide both a brief narrative description and funding itemization of the project activities relating to the proposed resources that directly support the designated Fusion Center.

This descriptive narrative should align with both the financial itemization and improvement or sustainment of performance measures because ofreceiving the proposed funding. If the project description and funding itemization do not directly support the fusion center and the relationship to the fusion center is not identified, then the

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

investment may be conditionally approved until a fusion Center Addendum is submitted and approved. Note: A sample project description and funding itemization are below.

Identi’ the expected improvement or sustainment of performance measures because of receiving the proposed funding for the itemized projects.

Effectively address performance measures identified in each fusion center’s individual assessment data found in the HSIN-Intel Fusion Centet Profile. A list of the 2019 Performance Measures can be found in the Preparedness Grants Manual.

Sample Fusion center Project Description
The following is an example of a sample fusion center project description that could be included in a SHSP or UASI investment:

The X Fusion enhancement project willfund salaries, benefits, and trainingfor X number of Fusion Center intelligence analysts, maintenance and supportfor the center’s enabling systems, travel costs associated with training, and the replacement ofX computer monitors within the fusion Center. The pro/ect will directly sustain the Center ‘s achieved abilittes and work to close the gap of any current capabilities through the sustained jimding ofits current ana4’ticat staffand enabling systems. This project directly aligns with performance measures 2019.1-2019.23. We anticipate seeing an improvement ofthe quality and quantity ofreporting as a direct result ofthe funding ofthis project.

Sample fusion center funding Itemization
the funding itemization for a fusion center investment should include the amount and percent of each relevant solution area. As an example:

Solution Area and Amount ofProposed Percent ofProposed
funding Funding
Planning: $10,000.00 2%
Organization. $200, 000 48%
Equipment: $200, 000 48%
Training: $10,000 2%
Exercises: $0 0%
Total: $420,000 100%
Completing IJs in the Grant Reporting Tool (GRT) (SHSP and UASI) In the Related Documents section of the Grants.gov posting, applicants can find the 1] template and instructions for collecting the required information for investments and projects. Additionally, applicants should utilize the Project Worksheet located in Grants.gov posting to assemble the information required for each project, which will facilitate the input of that information into the GRT.

Development of Concept of Operations for OPSG
As part of the fY 2019 OPSG application process, each eligible local unit of government at the county or federally-recognized tribal government levet must develop a strategic plan called a Concept of Operations (CONOP)/Application, which is a formal proposal of action to address a

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

specific situation and forms the basis for Operations Orders, in coordination with state and federal law enforcement agencies, to include, but not limited to CBP/USBP. CONOPs that are developed at the county level should he inclusive of city, county, tribal, and other local law enforcement agencies that are eligible to participate in OPSG operational activities, and the CONOP/Application should describe participating agencies in the Executive Summary.

CONOP/Application details should include the names of the agencies, points of contact. and individual funding requests. All CONOPs/Applications must be developed in collaboration with the local USBP sector office, the SAA and the local unit of government. Requests for funding in CONOPs/Applications must be based on risks and the operational enforcement support requirements of its corresponding USBP Sector. Sector offices will forward the CONOPs to USBP Headquarters for vetting and coordination. Applicants will forward corresponding OPSG Applications to the SAA for submission to FEMA. USBP Headquarters will reconcile all submitted CONOPs with the OPSG Applications.

Intergovernmental Review
An intergovernmental review may be required. Appticants must contact their state’s Single Point of Contact (SPOC) to comply with the state’s process under Executive Order 12372. See https://www.archives.gov/federal-registcr/codification/executive-order/ 123 72.htm I h ttps://wtvw.whitehouse.gov/wp-conteni/uploads/20 I 7/I I /SPOC-Feb -201 8.pd f.

Funding Restrictions
federal funds made available through this award may be used for the purpose set forth in this award and must be consistent with the statutory authority for the award. Award funds may not be used for matching funds for any other federal awards, lobbying, or intervention in federal regulatory or adjudicatory proceedings. In addition, federat funds may not be used to sue the federal Government or any other government entity. See the Preparedness Grants Manual for more information on funding restrictions.

Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on EHP Compliance.

Emergency Communications Investments
If an entity uses HSGP funding to support emergency communications investments, the following requirements shall apply to alt such grant-funded communications investments in support of the emergency communications priorities and recognized best practices:
• Applicants must describe in the investment how proposed communications investments align to needs identified in their SCIP. Effective project alignment will require advance coordination with the SWIC and consultation with governing bodies such as the SIGB or Statewide Interoperabitity Executive Committee (SIEC), as they serve as the primary steering group for the statewide interoperability strategy. Additionally, recipients should consult subject matter experts serving on governance bodies such as broadband experts, chief information officers, representatives from utilities, or legal and financial experts when developing proposals.
• The signatory authority for the SAA must certif’ in writing to DHS/FEMA their compliance with the £4fECOA’I Guidance. The certification letter should be coordinated with the SWIC for each state and must he uploaded to ND Grants at the

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

time of the first Program Performance Report (PPR) submission.

All states and territories must designate a hill-time SWIC who has the authority and resources to actively improve interoperability with emergency management and response agencies across all levels of government, to include establishing statewide plans, policies, and procedures, and coordinating decisions on communications investments funded through federal grants. Note that the designated full-time SWIC may also be the state’s or territory’s cybersecurity point of contact. SWIC status information will be maintained by the DHS Office of Emergency Communications and will be verified by FEMA GPD through programmatic monitoring activities.

By the period of performance end date, all states and territories must update their SCIP, with a focus oivcommunications resilience/continuity, to include assessment and mitigation of all potential risks identified in the SCIP: natural disasters, accidental damage (human failures), intentional damage (sabotage, terrorism), cybersecurity, etc.

Following the initial update, the SCIP should be updated on an annual basis. SCIP status information will be maintained by the DHS Office of Emergency Communications and will be verified by FEMA GPD through programmatic monitoring activities.

All states and territories must test their emergency commtinications capabilities and procedures (as outlined in their operational communications plans) in conjunction with regularly planned exercises (separate/addition emergency communications exercises arc not required) and must submit an After Action Report/Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) to the Homeland Sectirity Exercise and Evaluation Program’s (HSEEP) electronic message inbox at hseepfema.gov within 90 days of exercise completion. Exercises should be used to both demonstrate and validate skills learned in training and to identify gaps in capabilities.

Resilience and continuity of communications should be tested during training and exercises to the greatest extent possible. further, exercises should include participants from multiple jurisdictions, disciplines, and levels of government and include emergency management, emergency medical services, law enforcement, interoperability coordinators, public health officials, hospital officials, officials from colleges and universities, and other disciplines and private sector entities, as appropriate. Findings from exercises should be used to update programs to address gaps in emergency communications as well as emerging technologies, policies, and partners. Recipients are encouraged to increase awareness and availability of emergency communications exercise opportunities across all levels of government.

States, territories, and other eligible grant recipients are advised that HSGP funding may be used to support communications planning (including the cost of hiring a SWIC, participation in governance bodies and requirements delineated above), training, exercises, and equipment costs. Costs for transitioning to the FirstNet network may also be eligible. More information regarding FirstNet can be found in the Preparedness Grants Manual.
funds Transfer Restriction
The recipient is prohibited from transferring funds between programs (includes the SFISP, the UASI, and OPSG). Recipients can submit an investment/project where funds come from multiple funding sources (e.g., the SHSP and UASI), however, recipients are not allowed to divert funding from one program to another due to the risk-based funding allocations, which were made at the

fY 2019 HSGP NOFO

discretion of DHS/FEMA.

Pre-Award Costs
Pre-award costs arc allowable only with the prior written approval of DKS/FEMA and as included in the award agreement. To request pre-award costs, a written request must be included with the application, signed by the Authorized Representative ofthe entity. The letter must outline what the pre-award costs are for, including a detailed budget break-out of pre-award costs from the postaward costs, and a justification for approval.

Cost Principles
Costs charged to this award must be consistent with the Cost Principles for Federal Awards located at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart E. For more information on 2 C.F.R. Part 200, please refer to FEMA GPD Information Bulletin 400, FEA’L4 s Implementation of2 C. FR. Part 200. the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements ft)r Federal A wards (“Super Circular” or “Omn i Circular”).

Direct Costs
Planning
Planning costs are allowed under this program.

Organization
Organization costs are allowed under this program.

Equipment
Equipment costs are allowed under this program.

Training
Training costs are allowed under this program.

Exercises
Exercise costs are allowed under this program.

Personnel
Personnel hiring, overtime, and backfill expenses are permitted under this grant to perform allowable HSGP planning, organization. training, exercise, and equipment activities. Under OPSG, overtime costs are allowable only in so far as they meet the intent of the program. At! recipients and subrecipients of HSGP funds, including SI-ISP, UASI, and OPSG allocations, may not use more than 50 percent of their awards to pay for personnel activities unless a waiver is approved by FEMA. for more information on the 50 percent personnel cap, please see FEMA Information Bulletin (IB) 421, Clarification on the Personnel Reimbursementfor Intelligence Cooperation and Enhancement ofHomeland Security Act of2008 (Public Law 110-412) — the PRICE Act.

Operational Overtime
Operational Overtime costs are allowed under this program. Prior to use offunds for operational overtime, recipients must receive approval from DHS/FEMA.

Travel

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Domestic travel costs are allowed under this program, as provided for in this NOFO. International travel is not an allowable cost under this program unless approved in advance by DHS/FEMA.

Construction and Renovation
Construction and renovation costs to achieve capability targets related to preventing, preparing for, protecting against, or responding to acts of terrorism are alLowed under this program. for construction and renovation costs to be allowed, they must be specifically approved by DHS/FEMA in writing prior to the use of any program funds. Applicants must use the EHP approval process. Limits on the total amount of grant funding that may be used for construction or renovation may apply. Additionally, recipients are required to submit Standard form 424C.

Maintenance and Sustainment
Maintenance and Sustainment related costs, such as maintenance contracts, warranties, repair or replacement costs, upgrades, and user fees are allowable as described in F? 205-402-125-1, Maintenance Contracts and Warranty Coverage funded by Preparedness Grants Policy (Ii ltp:/!www. lèma. gov/media-l ibrary/assets/documents/32474).

Management and Administration (M&A) Costs
Management and administration (M&A) activities arc those directly relating to the management and administration of HSGP funds, such as financial management and monitoring. A maximum of up to five percent of HSGP funds awarded may be retained by the state, and any funds retained are to be used solely lbr M&A purposes associated with the HSGP award.

Subrecipients may also retain a maximum of up to 5 percent of the funding passed through by the state solely for M&A purposes associated with the HSGP award.

A state’s HSGP funds for M&A calculation purposes includes the total of its Si-ISP, UASI, and OPSG awards. While the SAA may retain up to 5 percent of this total for M&A, the state must still ensure that all subrecipient award amounts meet the mandatory minimum pass-through requirements that are applicable to each HSGP program. To meet this requirement, the percentage of SHSP and UASI funds passed through to local or tribal jurisdictions must be based on the state’s total HSGP award prior to withholding any M&A.

In retaining these funds, states may retain a maximum of 2.5 percent of the OPSG allocation, which must be withheld from the pass-through to each subrecipient county or tribe in an equal percentage. The SAA may also retain additional funding from its SHSP award to manage and administer the OPSG award, but that additional amount is also capped at an amount equal to

2.5 percent of the OPSG award. Examples applying this principle:

SAA 1:

SHSP: $1,000,000
OPSG: $2,500,000
UASI: $2,500,000
M&A Maximum: $300,000 (5 percent of $6,000,000)

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Maximum M&A for SHSP = $50,000
Maximum M&A for OPSG = $125,000. Ofthat amount. $62,500 (2.5 percent) may be retained from the OPSG allocation, and the other $62,500 would come from the SHSP allocation. Any amount used to manage and administer OPSG that is charged to SHSP may be above and beyond the $50,000 available to manage the SI-ISP allocation.

SAA2:

SHSP: $3,500,000
OPSG: $1,000,000
M&A Maximum: $225,000 (5 percent of $4,500,000)
Maximum M&A for SHSP: $175,000
Maximum M&A for OPSG = $50,000. Ofthat amount, $25,000 (2.5 percent) may be retained from the OPSG allocation, and the other $25,000 would come from the SHSP allocation. Any amount used to manage and administer OPSG that is charged to SHSP may be above and beyond the $175,000 available to manage the SHSP allocation.

Please note, Information Bulletin (lB) 365: Management and Administration Costs in the J-lomeland Securiy and DHS/FEMA Policy 207-087-1, which can be found at http://www.iema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id7837, do not apply to awards made in FY 2019 under this NOFO. The lB and Policy remain in effect for all previous awards.

Critical Emergency Supplies
Critical emergency supplies are allowed under this program.

Secure Identification
Secure Identification costs are allowed under this program.

Indirect (Facilities & Administrative [F&A]) Costs
Indirect costs are allowable under this program as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.414. Except for recipients who have never received a negotiated indirect cost rate as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.414(f), recipients must have an approved indirect cost rate agreement with their cognizant federal agency to charge indirect costs to this award. A copy of the approved rate (a fully executed, agreement negotiated with the applicant’s cognizant federal agency) is required at the time of application and must be provided to DHS/FEMA before indirect costs are charged to the award.

General Purpose Equipment
HSGP allows expenditures on general purpose equipment if it aligns to and supports one or more core capabilities identified in the Goal and has a nexus to terrorism preparedness. General purpose equipment, like all equipment funded under the KSGP, must be sharable through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC)’ and allowable under 6 U.S.C. § 609, and any other applicable provision ofthe Homeland Security Act of2002, as amended. Examples of such general purpose equipment may include:

Law enforcement vehicles;
Except for American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. which are not required to belong to EMAC at this time.

fY 2019 HSGP NOFO

• Emergency medical services (EMS) equipment and vehicles; • Fire service equipment and vehicles, to include hose, pump accessories, and foam concentrate for specialized chemical, biological, radiological, nttclear, and explosives (CBRNE) response; and
• Office equipment for staff2 engaged in homeland security program activity.

Equipment allowability is based on the Authorized Equipment List (AELI but exceptions may be considered on a case-by-case basis if(1) the equipment identified to be purchased directly maps to a core capability contained within the Goal, and (2) the eqtlipment’s purpose (when operational) falls under the permitted use of funds in accordance with 6 U.S.C. § 609, and any other applicable provision ofthe Homeland Security Act of2002, as amended.

Allowable Cost Matrix
The following matrix provides allowable cost activities that fall under each ofthe cost categories noted above. Recipients and subrecipients must follow all applicable requirements in 2 C.F.R. Part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirementsfor federal A wards).

This list is not exhaustive, therefore, if there are any questions regarding allowable costs, please contact the appropriate HQ GPD Program Analyst. F or additional information on atlowable costs, see the Preparedness Grants Manual.

Allowable Program Activities SHSP UASI OPSG
Allowable Planning Costs
Developing hazard/threat-specific annexes
Developing and implementing homeland security support programs and adopting ongoing DHS/FEMA national initiatives
Developing related terrorism and other catastrophic event prevention activities Developing and enhancing plans and protocols
Developing or conducting assessments
Hiring of full- or part-time staff or contract/consultants to assist with planning activities
Materials required to conduct planning activities
Travel/per diem related to planning activities
Overtime and backfill costs (in accordance with operational Cost Guidance) issuance ofWHTI-compliant Tribal identification cards
Activities to achieve planning inclusive of people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs and limited English proficiency.

Coordination with Citizen Corps Councils for public information/education and development ofvolunteer programs
Update governance structures and processes and plans for emergency communications Development, and review and revision of continuity of operations plans Development, and review and revision ofthe TIURA/SPR continuity of operations plans 2 This applies to all homeland security personnel and is not limited to management and administration staff, and costs are to be captured outside the cap on management and administration costs.

Page2l of3O
FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Atlowable Organizational Activities
Note Personnel hiring, overtime, and backfill expenses are permitted under this grant only to the extent that such expenses are for the allowable activities within the scope ofthe grant.

Program management
Development of whole community parttierships
Structures and mechanisms for information sharing between the public and private sector
Implementing models, programs, and workforce enhancement initiatives Tools, resources, and activities that facilitate shared situational awareness between the public and private sectors
Operational support
Utilization of standardized resource management concepts Responding to an increase in the threat level under the National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS), or needs in resulting from a National Special Security Event Reimbursement for select operational expenses associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites incurred (up to 50 percent of the allocation) Overtime for information, investigative, and intelligence sharing activities (up to 50 percent of the allocation)
Hiring of new staff positions/contractors/consultants for participation in information/intelligence analysis and sharing groups or fusion center activities (up to 50 percent ofthe allocation).

Allowable Equipment Categories
Personal Protective Equipment
Allowable Equipment categories
Explosive Device Mitigation and Remecliation Equipment
CBRNE Operational Search and Rescue Equipment
Information Technology
Cybersectirity Enhancement Equipment
Interoperable Communications Equipment
Detection
Decontamination
Medical countermeasures
Power (e.g.. generators, batteries, power cells)
CBRNE Reference Materials
CBRNE incident Response Vehicles
Terrorism Incident Prevention Equipment
Physical Security Enhancement Equipment
Inspection and Screening Systems
Animal Care and Foreign Animal Disease
CBRNE Prevention and Response Watercraft
CBRNE Prevention and Response Unmanned Aircraft
CBRNE Aviation Equipment
CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment
Intervention Equipment (e.g., tactical entry, crime scene processing) Critical emergency supplies
Vehicle rentals
Other Authorized Equipment
Allowable TraIning Costs
Overtime and backfill for emergency preparedness and response personnel attending Dl IS/FEMA-sponsored and approved training classes
Overtime and backfill expenses for part-time and volunteer emergency response personnel participating in DHS/FEMA training

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Training workshops and conferences
Activities to achieve training inclusive of people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs and limited English proficiency Full- or part-tinle staffor contractors/consultants
Travel
Supplies
Instructor certification/re-certification
Coordination with Citizen Corps Councils in conducting training exercises Interoperable communications training
Activities to achieve planning inclusive of people with limited English proficiency Tm migration enforcement training
Allowable ExerciseRelated Costs
Design, Develop, Conduct, and Evaluate an Exercise
full- or part-time staffor contractors/consultants
Overtime and backfill costs, including expenses for part-time and volunteer emergency response personnel participating in DHS/FEMA exercises Implementation of H SEEP
Activities to achieve exercises inclusive of people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs
Travel
Supplies
tnteroperablc communications exercises
Ulówble Exèicise Related costs
Activities to achieve planning inclusive of people with limited English proficiency AllowableManagement & Administrative costs
Hiring of full- or part-time staff or contractors/consultants to assist with the management of the respective grant program, application requirements. and compliance with reporting and data collection requirements Development of operating plans for information collection and processing necessary to respond to DHS/FEMA data calls
Overtime and backfill costs
Travel
Meeting related expenses
Authorized office equipment
Recurring expenses such as those associated with cell phones and Faxes during the PoP ofthe grant program
Leasing or renting ofspace for newly hired personnel during the PoP ofthe grant program
Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Activities (LETPA) Costs Maturation and enhancement of designated state and major Urban Area fusion centers
Coordination between fusion centers and other analytical and investigative efforts Implementation and maintenance of the Nationwide SAR Initiative Emplementation of the “If You See Something, Say Something®” campaign Increase physical security, through law enforcement personnel and other protective measures, by implementing preventive and protective measures at critical Building and sustaining preventive radiological and nuclear detection capabilities E. Application Review Information

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Allocations
Risk Methodology
The risk methodology determines the relative risk of terrorism faced by a given area considering the potential risk of terrorism to people, critical infrastructure, and economic security. The analysis includes tht-eats from violent domestic extremists, international terrorist groups, and individuals inspired by terrorists abroad. See the Preparedness Grants Manual for additional information on risk methodology.

NOTE: The THIRA/SPR process is separate from the risk methodology, and its results do not affect grant allocations.

SHSP Allocations
FY 2019 SI-ISP funds will bc allocated based on two factors: minimum amounts as legislativcty mandated, and DHS/fEMA’s risk methodology. THIRA/SPR results do not impact grant allocation or award.

Each state and territory wilt receive a minimum allocation under the SHSP using thresholds estab]ished in the Homeland Security Act of2002, as amended. All 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico will receive 0.35 percent of the total funds allocated for grants under Section 2003 and Section 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended. Each of the four territories (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) will receive a minimum allocation of 0.0$ percent of the total funds allocated for grants under Section 2003 and 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended.

UASI Allocations
FY 2019 UASI funds will be allocated based on DHS/FEMA’s risk methodology. TIIIRA/SPR results do not impact grant allocation or award.

Eligible candidates for the fY 2019 UASI program have been determined through an analysis of relative risk ofterrorism faced by the 100 most populous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in the United States, in accordance with the Homeland Security Act of2002, as amended. Detailed information on MSAs is publicly available from the United States Census Bureau at h ttps://www.census.gov/prorams-surveys/metrornicro .htm 1..

OPSG Allocations
The fY 2019 OPSG Risk Assessment is designed to identify the risk to border security and to assist with the distribution of funds for the grant program. Funding under OPSG is distributed based on the risk to the security ofthe border. Entities eligible for funding are the state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies that are located along the border of the United States. The THIRA/SPR process is not required for OPSG.

For the purposes of OPSG, the risk is defined as the potential for an adverse outcome assessed as a function of threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences associated with an incident, event, or occurrence.

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Based upon ongoing intelligence analysis and extensive security reviews, DHS/CBP continues to focus the bulk of OPSG funds based upon risk analyses. The risk model used to allocate OPSG funds considers the potential risk that certain threats pose to border security and estimate the relative risk faced by a given area. In evaluating risk, DHS/CBP considers intelligence, situational awareness, criminal trends, and statistical data specific to each of the border sectors, and the potential impacts that these threats pose to the security of the border area. F or vulnerability and consequence, DHS/CBP considers the expected impact and consequences of successful border events occurring in specific areas.

Threat and vulnerability are evaluated based on specific operational data from DHS/CBP.

Threat components present in each ofthe sectors are used to determine the overall threat score.

These components are terrorism, criminat aliens, drug trafficking organizations, and alien smuggling organizations.

Application Evaluation Criteria
FEMA will evaluate the FY 2019 HSGP applications for completeness, adherence to programmatic guidelines, and anticipated effectiveness of the proposed investments. FEMA’s review will include verification that each IJ or project:
• Aligns with at least one core capability identified in the Goal; • Demonstrates how investments support closing capability gaps or sustaining capabilities identified in the THIRA/SPR process; and
• Supports a NIMS-typed resource and whether those assets are deployable/shareable to support emergency or disaster operations per existing EMAC agreements.

In addition to the above, FEMA will evaluate whether proposed projects are: 1) both feasible and effective at reducing the risks for which the project was designed; and 2) able to be fully completed within the three-year PoP. FEMA will use the information provided in the application and after the submission of the first BSIR to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a grant project. To that end, 1J5 should include:
• An explanation of how the proposed project will achieve objectives as identified in the SPR, including expected long-term impact where applicable, and which core capability gap(s) it helps to close and how;
• A summary ofthe status of planning and design efforts accomplished to date (e.g., included in a capital improvement plan); and
• A project schedule with clear milestones.

Recipients are expected to conform, as applicable, with accepted engineering practices, established codes, standards, modeling techniques, and best practices, and participate in the development of case studies demonstrating the effective use of grant funds, as requested.

Review and Selection Process (SHSP and UASI)
To ensure the effectiveness of proposed investments and projects, all applications will undergo a federal review. The federal review will be conducted by FEMA HQ Program Analysts. FEMA HQ Program Analysts will use a checklist to veri& compliance with all administrative and eligibility criteria identified in the NOFO. Recipients must be able to demonstrate how

FY 2019 HSCP NOFO

investments support closing capability gaps or sustaining capabilities identified in the THIRA!SPR process. us will be reviewed at both the investment and project level. A program hold may be placed on any investment which is foctnd to be noncompliant.

Fusion center investments will be jointly reviewed by FEMA and the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis (l&A) for compliance with HSGP NOFO requirements to prioritize the alignment of requests with results from the annual Fusion Center Assessment Program. If a fusion center investment does not meet the requirements, a fusion Center Addendum must be completed and submitted for review and approval prior to expending funds allocated to fusion center activities.

Emergency communications investments will be jointly reviewed by FEMA and the DI-IS Office of Emergency Communications (OEC) to verify compliance with SAFECOM guidance. FEMA and OEC will coordinate directly with the recipient on any compliance concerns and will provide technical assistance as necessary to help ensure full compliance.

Review and Selection Process (OPSG)
Applications will be reviewed by the SAA and USBP Sector Headquarters for completeness and adherence to programmatic guidelines and evaluated for anticipated feasibility, need, and impact of the Operations Orders. for more information on Operations Orders and other requirements of OPSG, see the Preparedness Grants Manual.

DHS/FEMA will verify compliance with all administrative and eligibility criteria identified in the NOFO and required submission of Operations Orders and Inventory of Operations Orders by the established due dates. DHS/FEMA and USBP will usc the results of both the risk analysis and the federal review by DHS/FEMA to make recommendations for funding to the Secretary of Homeland Secitrity.

FY 2019 OPSG funds will be allocated competitively based on risk-based prioritization using the OPSG Risk Assessment described above. Final funding allocations are determined by the Secretary, who may consider information and input from various law enforcement offices or subject-matter experts within the Department. Factors considered include, but are not limited to threat, vulnerability, miles ofthe border, and other border-specific law enforcement intelligence, as well as the feasibility of fY 2019 Operations Orders to designated localities within border states and territories.

Financial Integrity Criteria
Prior to making a federal award, DHS/FEMA is required by 31 U.S.C. § 3321 note, 41 U.S.C. § 2313, and 2 C.F.R. § 200.205 to review information available through any 0MB-designated repositories of government-wide eligibility qualification or financial integrity information.

Application evaluation criteria may include the following risk-based considerations of the applicant:

I. Financial stability;

2. Quality of management systems and ability to meet management standards;

3. History olperformance in managing Federal awards;

4. Reports and findings from audits; and

5. Ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements.

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

Supplemental Financial Integrity Review
Prior to making a Federal award where the anticipated Federal share of a Federal award will be greater than the simplified acquisition threshold, currently $250,000 (see Section 805 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, Pub. L. No. 115-91, 0MB Memorandum M- 1 8-1 8 at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/20 1 8/O6IM- I 8-I 8.pdf: see also FEMA GPD Information Bulletin No. 434. Increases and Changes to the Micro-Purchase and Simplified Acquisition Thresholds):
• DHS!fEMA is required to review and consider any information about the applicant in the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (SAM), which is currently the federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPEIS) and is also accessible through the SAM website. • An applicant, at its option, may review information in FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a Federal awarding agency previously entered. • DHSIFEMA will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgment about the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants, as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.205.

F. federal Award Ad ministration Information
Notice of Award
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on Notice of Award.

Administrative and National Policy Requirements
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on Administrative and National Policy requirements.

SHSP and UASI Pass-Through Requirements
Awards made to the SAA for HSGP carry additional pass-through requirements. Pass-through is defined as an obligation on the part of the SAA to make funds available to local units of government, combinations of local units, tribal governments, or other specific groups or organizations. Four requirements must be met to pass-through grant funds:
• The SAA must make a firm written commitment to passing through grant funds to subrecipients;
• The SAA’s commitment must be unconditional (i.e., no contingencies for the availability of SAA funds);
• There must be documentary evidence (i.e., award document, terms, and conditions) of the commitment; and
• The award terms must be communicated to the subrecipient.

Timing and Amount
The SAA must pass-through at least 80 percent ofthe funds awarded under the SHSP and UASI to local or tribal units of government within 45 calendar days ofreceipt of the funds. “Receipt of the funds” occurs either when the SAA accepts the award or 15 calendar days after the SAA receives notice of the award, whichever is earlier.

FY 20t9 HSGP NOFO

SAAs are sent notification of HSGP awards via the GPD’s ND Grants system. If an SAA accepts its award within 15 calendar days of receiving notice of the award in the ND Grants system, the 45-calendar days pass-through period will start on the date the SAA accepted the award. Should an SAA not accept the FISGP award within 15 calendar days of receiving notice of the award in the ND Grants system, the 45-calendar days pass-through period will begin 15 calendar days after the award notification is sent to the SAA via the NDGrants system.

It is important to note that the PoP start date does not directly affect the start of the 45-calendar days pass-through period. For example, an SAA may receive notice of the HSGP award on August 20, 2019, while the PoP dates for that award are September 1, 2019, throtigh August 31, 2022. In this example, the 45-day pass-through period will begin on the date the SAA accepts the HSGP award or September 4, 2019 (15 calendar days after the SAA was notified of the award). whichever date occurs first. The PoP start date of September 1, 2019, would not affect the timing of meeting the 45-calendar day pass-through requirement.

Other SHSP and UASI Pass-Through Requirements
The signatory authority of the SAA must certify in writing to DHS/FEMA that pass-through requirements have been met. A letter of intent (or eqttivalent) to distribute funds is not considered sufficient. The pass-through requirement does not apply to SHSP awards made to the District ofColumbia, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is required to comply with the pass-through requirement, and its SAA must also obligate at least 80 percent ofthe funds to local units of government within 45 calendar days of receipt of the funds.

Under SI ISP, the SAA may retain more than 20 percent of funding for expenditures made by the state on behalf of the local unit(s) of government. This may occur only with the written consent ofthe local unit of government, specifying the amount of funds to be retained and the intended use of funds. States shall review their written consent agreements yearly and ensure that they are still valid. If a written consent agreement is already in place from previous fiscal years, DHS/FEMA will continue to recognize it for FY 2019, unless the written consent review indicates the local government is no longer in agreement. If modifications to the existing agreement are necessary, the SAA should contact their assigned FEMA HQ Program Analyst.

Additional OPSG Requirements
The recipient is prohibited from obligating or expending funds provided through this award until each unique and specific county-level or equivalent Operational Order/fragmentary Operations Order budget has been reviewed and approved through an official electronic mail notice issued by DHS/FEMA removing this special programmatic condition.

Reporting
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on reporting requirements.

Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) and Stakeholder Preparedness Review (SPR) Process

FY 2019 HSGP NOFO

See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on the TRIRA and SPR process.

Supplemental Information Reporting Systems
In addition to ND Grants, the following information systems are used for the submission of required reports:

Grant Reporting Tool (GRT)
Information on the GRT can be found in the Preparedness Grants Manual.

Unified Reporting Tool (URT)
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on the URT.

Closeout Reporting Requirements
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on closeout reporting requirements.

Disclosing Information per 2 C.F.R. § 180.335
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on disclosing information.

C. DHS/FEMA Awarding Acncv Contact Inforniatign
Contact and Resource Information
Centralized Scheduling and In formation Desk (CSID)
CSID is a non-emergency comprehensive management and information resource developed by DHS/FEMA for grant stakeholders. CSID provides general information on all DHS/FEMA grant programs and maintains a comprehensive database containing key personnel contact information at the federal, state, and local levels. When necessary, recipients will be directed to a federal point of contact who can answer specific programmatic questions or concerns. CSID can be reached by phone at ($00) 368-6498 or by e-mail at askcsid(ferna.gov. Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. ET.

GPD Grant Operations Division
GPD’s Grant Operations Division Business Office provides support regarding financial matters and budgetary, technical assistance. Additional guidance and information can be obtained by contacting the FEMA Call Center at 866-927-5646 or via e-mail to ASK-GMDfema.gov.

FEMA Regional Offices
FEMA Regional Offices may also provide fiscal support, including pre- and post-award administration and technical assistance stich as conducting cash analysis, financial monitoring, and audit resolution for the grant programs included in this solicitation. GPD will provide programmatic support and technical assistance. FEMA Regional Office contact information is available here.

GPD Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) The DHS/FEMA GPD EHP Team provides guidance and information about the EKP review process to recipients and subrecipients. All inquiries and communications about GPD projects