San Marino City Council
February 9, 2022

RESOLUTION NO. PCR-22-01

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL, ADOPT THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT (SIXTH CYCLE) OF THE SAN MARINO GENERAL PLAN AND APPROVE THE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION.

WHEREAS, Government Code § 65580 et seq. requires the City of San Marino to periodically prepare and update its Housing Element in its General Plan. The City’s Housing Element establishes goals, policies, and programs to accommodate the maintenance and expansion of the City’s housing supply; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Marino’s 2021-2029 Draft Housing Element includes updated data in compliance with state housing laws and a variety of programs and strategies to address citywide housing needs and priorities; and
WHEREAS, the 2021-2029 Draft Housing Element- dated November 1, 2021 (attached as Exhibit A) involved an extensive public outreach campaign including a Planning Commission workshop on February 24, 2021, and City Council workshops/presentations on April 16, 2021, July 14th, 2021, August 3rd, 2021, and September 24, 2021, and was prepared based on input from the City Council, Planning Commission, and public comments; and
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2021, the City Council directed staff to submit the Draft Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to include additional edits summarized in the Staff Report (attached as Exhibit B); and WHEREAS, the Housing Element was circulated to HCD on November 1, 2021 for a 60-day HCD review; and
WHEREAS, on December 31, 2021, HCD provided its 60-day comments to the City of San Marino 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Draft Housing Element via email on December 31, 2021 (the HCD letter is attached as Exhibit C); and
WHEREAS, City staff and the City’s Housing Consultant reviewed the comments from HCD and, to the extent practicable, have made conforming edits and changes and incorporated comments and responses as reflected in Exhibit D (Edits to November 1, 2021 Draft Housing Element); and
WHEREAS, the 2021-2029 Housing Element was reviewed for consistency with the City’s General Plan and San Marino Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the 2021-2029 Housing Element was prepared pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq., CEQA Guidelines § 15070, and the City of San Marino Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA, assessing the potential environmental impacts that might result from the

CITY OF SAN MARINO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PCR-22-01

adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element, and the City determined that there was no substantial evidence that adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element may have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study and Negative Declaration is incorporated by reference as Exhibit E; and
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, at which time it considered all material and evidence, whether written or oral.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Marino as follows:

SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby declares that the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and incorporated into this resolution as findings of the Planning Commission.

SECTION 2. FINDINGS.

A. That the above recitations are true and correct.

B. That the 2021-2029 Housing Element addresses all of the requirements as set forth Government Code §§ 65302 and 65580.

C. That the Planning Commission hereby determines that the 2021-2029 Housing Element is compatible with, consistent with and integrated with all other elements of the City’s General Plan.

D. That the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the 2021-2029 Housing Element.

E. That the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element by the City Council with revisions necessary to obtain certification from HCD.

SECTION 3. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The Planning Commission hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional.

CITY OF SAN MARINO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PCR-22-01

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of San Marino, California, on this 26th day of January, 2022.

SHELLEY BOYLE,
Chair, San Marino Planning Commission

ATTEST:

ALEX HAMILTON
Secretary, San Marino Planning Commission

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

CITY OF SAN MARINO
HOUSING ELEMENT and CEQA NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT AN INITIAL

STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of San Marino (City) has prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration (IS-ND) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, §§ 21000, et seq.), for consideration during public hearings for the adoption of the City of San Marino Housing Element Update project described below. The IS-ND has reviewed the Housing Element Update and comments discussed below and determined that the project will have either a less than significant, or no impact to environmental resources requiring mitigation measures consistent with CEQA. This notice invites comments on the adequacy and completeness of the environmental analysis in the IS-ND.

Project Description and Background
The incorporated City of San Marino is 3.77 square miles of approximately 12,513 people located in North Central Los Angeles County, California. The Draft Housing Element is an element of the City’s General Plan that establishes housing land use policy, and programs applicable within the incorporated City boundaries for the 2021-2029 planning period. The California legislature has placed a priority on the provision of housing for Californians at all economic levels and has established an eight-year update cycle for all city and county General Plan Housing Elements which also undergo review by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). This project consists of the 6th Cycle of Housing Element update and revisions to address comments received from HCD.

On December 7, 2020, the City began outreach for the Housing Element Update by holding a Town Hall Meeting. Opinion surveys were conducted in Chinese, English, and Spanish and a website was established to provide an information clearinghouse for the Housing Element Update. The City held stake-holder interviews, a public workshop by the Planning Commission, and a series of town hall meetings, public workshops, and hearings were held by the City Council. The Draft Housing Element was approved by the City Council on October 29, 2021, for delivery to HCD, and after extensive public outreach and refinements.

IS-ND Comment Period
The 20-day public comment period on the IS-ND for the Housing Element Update project begins on January 19, 2022, and will end on February 7, 2022, at 5:00 PM. All interested persons are encouraged to review the IS-ND and submit written comments that are focused on the adequacy and completeness of the IS-ND document environmental analysis. All comments on the IS-ND should be addressed to the to the attention of Alex Hamilton, Interim Community Development Director, City Hall, 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108, or [email protected].

FINAL HOUSING ELEMENT: UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARINGS AND

OPPORTUNITIES TO COMMENT
On December 31, 2021, HCD provided comments to the City regarding the Draft Housing Element’s consistency with State Housing regulations. The Final Housing Element will consist of the Draft Housing Element with State HCD comments addressed and will be considered by the City of San Marino Planning Commission and City Counsel at the Housing Element adoption hearings in late January and early February. The City is currently finalizing the Housing Element to address the comments in HCD’s letter.  Planning Commission Hearing: January 26, 2022, at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers
Attachment F

 City Council Hearing: February 9, 2022, at 6:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers Notices and agendas for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings on the Final Housing Element Update will be sent out 10 days prior to the hearings to the To comment on the Final Housing Element and HCD letter please submit comments to the City of San Marino Community Development Department at City Hall, 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108, or [email protected].

The IS-ND, Housing Element Update documents, and details about the Housing Element Update process can be reviewed on the City website at,
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/government/departments/community_development/2021- 2029_housing_element.php
A copy of all relevant material is on file in the offices of the San Marino City Clerk. All interested persons are invited and present comments at the public hearing. Should you have any questions prior to the hearings or to schedule an appointment to view the documents, please contact the Community Development Department (626) 300-0700.

CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ADVISORY
In addition to attending the meeting in person, members of the public also may observe and offer comments at this meeting electronically via Zoom. Participation instructions can be found on the agenda when it is posted. Public comments will also be accepted by email to [email protected] before or during the meetings, and prior to the close of public comment period on an item, to be read by the City Clerk during public comment period. Lengthy public comments may be summarized in the interest of time. If your comment is not submitted prior to the close of the public hearing for the particular item, your comment will be reflected as having been submitted during the Council Meeting but will not be part of the record of the public hearing.

By: Christina Baker
City Clerk
Date: January 3, 2022
Publish: January 10, 2021
Notice No.: N-22-01

City of San Marino
2021-2029 Housing Element Update
Initial Study - Negative Declaration
prepared by
4LEAF, Inc.
2126 Rheem Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
prepared for
City of San Marino
Department of Community Development
2200 Huntington Drive
San Marino, CA 91108
January 2022

This report prepared on 50% recycled paper with 50% post-consumer content.

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Initial Study ............................................................................................................................................ 1

1. Project Title ......................................................................................................................... l

2. Lead Agency Name and Address ........................................................................................ 1

3. Contact Person and Phone Number ................................................................................... 1

4. Project Location .................................................................................................................. l

5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address ................................................................................ 2

6. General Plan Designation ................................................................................................... 2

7. Zoning ................................................................................................................................. 2

8. Description of Project ......................................................................................................... 2

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting .................................................................................... 3

10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required .......................................................... 4

11. Have California Native American Tribes Traditionally and Culturally Affiliated with the Project Area Requested Consultation Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1? .......................................................................................................................... 4 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .......................................................................................... 6 Determination ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Environmental Checklist ........................................................................................................................ 9 1 Aesthetics ........................................................................................................................... 9 2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ................................................................................. 11 3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 12 4 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 13 5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 15 6 Energy ............................................................................................................................... 16 7 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................. 17 8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................... 21 9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................... 22 10 Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................................... 25 11 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................................. 29 12 Mineral Resources ........................................................................................................................ 30 13 Noise ............................................................................................................................................. 31 14 Population and Housing ................................................................................................................ 33 15 Public Services .............................................................................................................................. 34 16 Recreation .................................................................................................................................... 36 17 Transportation .............................................................................................................................. 37 18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................. 39 19 Utilities and Service Systems ....................................................................................................... 41 20 Wildfire ......................................................................................................................................... 43 21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ............................................................................................. 45 References ................................................................................................................................... 4 7 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 47 Initial Study - Negative Declaration

City of San Marino
lnltlal Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
List of Preparers ........................................................................................................................... 47 Tables
Table 1: Regional Housing Needs Allocation for the 2021-2029 period ................................................... 3 Figures
Figure 1
ii
Project Location .................................................................................................................. 1

Initial Study

1. Project Title
City of San Marino 2021-2029 Housing Element Update

2. Lead Agency Name and Address
City of San Marino, Community Development Department
2200 Huntington Drive, 1st Floor San Marino, CA 91108

3. Contact Person and Phone Number
Alex Hamilton, Interim Director of Community Development (626) 300-0713

4. Project Location
Initial Study
Citywide. As an element of the City of San Marino's General Plan, the Housing Element Update will apply to all properties in the City for the 2021-2029 planning period. The City of San Marino is located in the center of the County of Los Angeles, south of the San Gabriel Mountains and approximately 11 miles north of the City of Los Angeles. the cities of Pasadena, South Pasadena, San Gabriel, and Alhambra surround San Marino. See Figure 1 below.

Initial Study - Negative Declaration

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
Los Angeles County
San Marino
Slml,l Lv Jlif'IU"'I"
f"IL'HH,l
�'.!?i;:�:;1
ro111tt
s,11, GA8RrEL '<f'(JUNl/11Ns
- '/1,j\
(I ti,r:rnh I q_.,111"
�.r----... ,.,,. M,;itm,l Los Angeles ,,-
Sml Ann
••1•
fl,)(! t\i)
tut�m'll;ll"liQ.J
◊nlilllH
I< lllChV $,ml ,I
M.11,_1,1111,1
Esn, I-IERE. Garmin, FAO, USGS, NG/I, fP/1, NPS

5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address
City of San Marino, Department of Community Development 2200 Huntington Drive, 1st Floor San Marino, CA 91108

6. General Plan Designation
Citywide -various

7. Zoning
Citywide -various

8. Description of Project
The City of San Marino is proposing to adopt an update of its Housing Element for the 2021 to 2029 period. State law requires each city to update its Housing Element every eight (8) years and submit it for certification to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). This is the 6
th Housing Element update cycle since the California Legislature identified housing as a priority statewide and began regular updating to General Plan Housing Elements, including the City of San Marino. The current update process started in November 2020 when the city engaged the 4LEAF, Inc consulting team to lead the draft update. The Draft Housing Element was transmitted to HCD on November 1, 2021. Subsequently, McNulty Consulting was engaged by the city in December 2021 to lead the adoption phase
2

Initial Study
A major component of the Housing Element update is the City's shortage of adequate sites to meet the regional housing need. The regional housing need allocation (RHNA) is an estimate of the city's housing needs at all price levels, based on the existing population plus its projected growth, over the next eight years. HCD determines the housing needs for each region in the state and provided to the representative area associations of governments who distributes the RHNA to the cities and counties.

The total units estimated for the entire Southern California region were distributed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).

The RHNA for the City of San Marino's 6
th cycle (2021 to 2029 period) Housing Element is 397 units (see Table 1, below). The City is not required to construct additional housing units or issue building permits to meet the RHNA allocation, but it must make adequate sites available with appropriate residential zoning and development potential to accommodate the RHNA over the 8-year planning period. To do this, the City is required to evaluate land use patterns, development regulations and challenges, and identify potentially developable land to demonstrate how the City plans to accommodate the City's RHNA allocation. Because San Marino currently lacks sufficient sites with appropriate zoning to accommodate its assigned RHNA, this Housing Element Update includes programs to consider sites for rezoning. Parcel-specific CEQA analysis will be conducted for the housing element rezoning project. Attempting to analyze individual rezoning on a parcel-by-parcel basis at this time would be speculative and is not within the scope of the project evaluated in this Initial Study.

This Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS-ND) provides compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines required for the city to analyze and adopt the 2021 Housing Element Update, and focuses on whether the Project, as defined, may cause significant effects on the environment. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 21083.3, this IS-ND is intended to assess any effects on the environment that are specific to the 2021 Housing Element Update at a plan level. The location and extent of any specific development project(s) that might result from the adoption of the 2021 Housing Element Update are not yet known, and any attempt to analyze them within this document would be speculative.

Table 1: Regional Housing Needs Allocation for the 2021-2029 period. llr?loo,iiTrtei :lell:els
B�IL.,_ Lew, ��� -Mw•M�r.a
149 91 91

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
66 Total
397
San Marino is a small city within the large and diverse Los Angeles County. While San Marino is served by the nearby freeway network (710, 210 and 134) and by the Metro bus lines 78/79/379, it does not have high-speed rail services and does not contain any Priority Growth Areas envisioned in Connect SoCal 2020-2045. San Marino's 2020 population of 12,870 represents a decrease from the 2010 population of 13,187. This lack of growth is consistent with that of the County of Los Angeles and the State of California, both of which have recently begun decreasing in population (2019 Census).

Initial Study - Negative Declaration 3

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
Incorporated in 1913, San Marino was almost completely built out by the 1970s. San Marino is characterized by its beautiful homes and has multiple historic neighborhoods and structures. The intention of the City's founding fathers was to develop and maintain a residential area that would be high-quality and crime-free that provides great schools, parks, and an exclusive lifestyle. The City's physical form today reflects those early values and development patterns, as most of the land is designated for residential use, with areas of recreational and commercial uses. The City's lack of vacant parcels and subdivision potential has impeded development since the 1970s: an average of less than 6 new home permits have been issued annually since 1980, not counting Accessory Dwelling Units.

10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required
None

11. Have California Native American Tribes Traditionally and Culturally Affiliated with the Project Area
Requested Consultation Pursuant to Public Resources
Code Section 21080.3. 1?
No Native American Tribes requested consultation in regard to this project. 4

Initial Study
This page intentionally left blank.
lni1ial Study - Negative Declaration 5

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
Environmental Factors Potentially
Affected
This project would potentially affect the environmental factors checked below, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant" or "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

D Aesthetics D Agriculture and D Air Quality
Forestry Resources
D Biological Resources D Cultural Resources D Energy
D Geology/Soils D Greenhouse Gas D Hazards & Hazardous
Emissions Materials
D Hydrology/Water Quality D Land Use/Planning D Mineral Resources □ Noise □ Population/Housing D Public Services
□ Recreation □ Transportation □ Tribal Cultural Resources D Utilities/Service Systems □ Wildfire □ Mandatory Findings of Significance
6

Determination
Determination
Based on this initial evaluation:
■ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
□ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
□ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
□ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "less than significant with mitigation incorporated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

Initial Study - Negative Declaration 7

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
8 □ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potential significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Alex Hamilton
Printed Name
Date
Interim Director, Community
Development Department
Title

Environmental Checklist
l Aesthetics
Except as provided in Public Resources Code
Section 21099, would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from a publicly
accessible vantage point). If the project is
in an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect daytime
or nighttime views in the area?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
□
□
D
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
□
□
□
□
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Environmental Checklist
Aesthetics
Less than
Significant
Impact
□
□
□
■
No Impact
■
■
■
□
The entire city is urbanized and there are no local or state designated scenic vistas or state scenic highways within the city or its immediate vicinity. The project would not have the potential to have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista and would therefore, have no impact on a designated scenic vista.

NO IMPACT
b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? There are no State scenic highways within the city or in the near vicinity. Therefore, the project would not have the potential to substantially damage scenic resources along a state scenic highway.

NO IMPACT
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 9

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
c. Would the project, in non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? {Public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
The project site is an urbanized area subject to the Design Review requirements in Article 15 of the San Marino City Code applies to new or replacement structures and changes to structures visible from public views. Objective design review requirements apply to new housing construction that would be expected to affect public views. The project does not propose specific development projects that would conflict with applicable design regulations governing scenic quality. Specific development projects would be speculative at this time but in the future would be subject to the latest Article 15 regulations or other regulations protecting scenic quality in place at the time future residential development is proposed. Additionally, the city has adopted Objective Design Standards that would apply to visual quality of design features. Therefore, project approval would have a less than significant impact by conflicting with regulations governing public views or scenic quality.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area?
Although the Housing Element Update itself does not propose any specific development with lighting or glare components, its policies would encourage new housing construction that would be expected to create new sources of lighting and windows. City Code Sec. 23.15.03.B indicates that new or replacement residential structures are subject to design review. The Community Development Department, Planning Commission and Design Review Committee ensure that new development follows the latest Building Code and design standards to prevent light pollution and glare from windows or other components from a building. Additionally, as discussed in the previous section, the city is adopting Objective Design Standards that address lighting impacts. The project is not expected to create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime view in the area.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
10

Environmental Checklist
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Less than
Significant
Potentially with Less than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? □ □ □ ■
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use or a Williamson Act contract? □ □ □ ■
C. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 12220(g));
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code Section 4526); or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(g))? □ □ □ ■
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use? □ □ D ■
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use? □ □ □ ■
There is no farmland, or land zoned for agricultural use or forest land in the city or its near vicinity; therefore, the project would not have any impact on farm, agricultural, or forestry resources.

NO IMPACT
Initial Study - Negative Declaration l l

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
3 Air Quality
Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
□
□
□
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
□
□
□
□
Less than
Significant
Impact
□
□
□
□
No Impact
■
•
•
■
The Housing Element does not propose land use changes that would allow high pollutant uses such as industrial; however, it does encourage more residential density which may increase automobile traffic. In order to help prevent an impact to traffic, the Housing Element has an implementation policy encouraging development near existing transit facilities. Goal 1 is to provide a range of housing opportunities for all income levels, and one of its policies is to allow interior conversion of singlefamily residences into duplexes or triplexes in neighborhoods near jobs and transit. The approval of the Housing Element also does not automatically allow new construction; however, it encourages building residential units. Policies and land uses allowing an increased range of residential densities adjacent to employment may increase opportunities to reduce single vehicle commuting and greater use of transit, which in turn could result in fewer vehicle emissions. Construction for these ends would be subject to use of the latest construction emissions reduction measures by the California Air Quality Board and not represent an impact to exceed federal, state, or regional air quality standards.

As such, implementation of the 2021 Housing Element will not have an impact on air quality, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

NO IMPACT
12

4 Biological Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or
by the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? D
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? D
C. Have a substantial adverse effect on state
or federally protected wetlands (including,
but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means? D
d. Interfere substantially with the movement
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? D
e. Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? D
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan? D
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
Environmental Checklist
Biological Resources
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
D ■
D ■
D ■
D ■
D ■
D ■
The city is almost entirely developed with built out. The few open spaces include parks, school fields, and the Huntington gardens. There are no wetlands, wildlife corridors, or adopted habitat Initial Study - Negative Declaration 13

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
conservation plans. Future housing construction is speculative at this time; however, such projects would be subject to the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act which protects nesting birds. Any future project related tree removals be subject to review consistent with the City of San Marino Heritage Tree Protection Ordinance in Article 19 of the City of San Marino Municipal Code. There is no potential for the project to have an impact on biological resources, per this section, as no open spaces are encouraged to be developed and all future development will be subject to all applicable regulations related to biological resources.

NO IMPACT
14

5 Cultural Resources
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
□
□
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
□
□
□
Environmental Checklist
Cultural Resources
Less than
Significant
Impact
□
□
□
No Impact
■
■
■
The project proposal is to update the Housing Element, which stipulates future discretionary actions such as changing the zoning designations of some sites in order to increase the potential for housing.

At the time future development projects are proposed, the City will review the proposal for potential impacts to historical resources as defined by the Guidelines to the Implementation of CEQA § 15064.5, which includes: A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Pub. Res. Code§ 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et seq.).

When zoning changes, historic status of subject properties would be assessed. However, much of the land in the city is already developed. Any future disturbance of native soils or disturbance of human remains, or artifacts would require assessment by a qualified archaeologist or a tribal cultural resources expert. All construction undergoes preliminary review for historic preservation review per Article 18 of the City Code and in some cases further design review. Since the specific location of future projects is speculative at this time the Housing Element Update project does not have a potential for impact on cultural resources.

NO IMPACT
Initial Study� Negative Declaration IS

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
6 Energy
Would the project:
a. Result in a potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption
of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
□
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
□
Less than
Significant
Impact
D
□
No Impact
■
■
The update of the Housing Element would not consume any energy by itself, but it encourages development for the construction of new residences and/or the remodel of existing structures to allow for more residences in the city. Short-term construction and long-term occupancy activities, as a result of future development, would result in energy consumption. Construction activities would consume energy to power equipment, transport equipment and vehicles, and construction materials to be manufactured. Occupancy of new residences would consume energy through the demand for electricity and gas for lighting, air conditioning, heating; and the residents' use of personal vehicles.

However, future development would require permitting such as building and design review entitlements. Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations; energy Conservation Standards for new residential buildings are updated every three years. Title 24 ensures building designs conserve energy by requiring the use of new energy efficiency technologies and methods in new developments.

Currently, the California Energy Commission (CEC) Title 24 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards are in effect; they were updated in 2019 and the updates took effect on January 1, 2020. The city verifies compliance with the current versions of the California Building Code and Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Therefore, the proposed Housing Element Update project will not result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful or inefficient use of energy, and it will not conflict with state or local plans for renewable or efficient energy.

NO IMPACT
16

7 Geology and Soils
Would the project:
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

1. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial evidence
of a known fault?

2. Strong seismic ground shaking?

3. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?

4. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
C. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial direct
or indirect risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
Initial Study - Negative Declaration
Less than
Significant
Potentially with
Significant Mitigation
Impact Incorporated
□ D
□ D
□ D
□ D
□ D
D D
D □
D □
D □
Environmental Checklist
Geology and Soils
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
• D
■ D
□ •
• D
D ■
□ ■
□ ■
□ ■
□ •
17

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
a.1. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? A portion of the Sierra Madre-San Fernando fault runs east-west through the city, roughly 1,000 feet north and parallel to Huntington Drive. The City regulates the construction of new habitable structures within the identified hazard areas, through the requirement of setbacks and construction standards in accordance with State law. Design and construction requirements related to seismic hazards are based on hazard mapping and Seismic Design Categories. The San Marino Municipal Code provides requirements and regulations for different Seismic Design Categories. These building requirements are likely to increase costs of housing development but are necessary to mitigate risks and minimize loss of life and property associated with these hazards.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a.2. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? Any city with a fault zone, has the potential to experience earthquakes, which strength and time are unpredictable with specificity as to their time and location. These seismic events could put lives and property at risk. Additional residences which at this time are speculative, would also be exposed to these risks; however, and as mentioned in section a.1 above, State and City construction codes help minimize the risks for significant damage to people and property from strong ground shaking through soils and construction materials engineering and design standards. Future housing projects with locations that are speculative now, would be required to undergo review for compliance with the building code for structures in proximity to fault lines. The construction standards protect residents from adverse effects of ground shaking to the extent practicable. Therefore, the Housing Element Update project would have a less than significant impact related to potential adverse effects of ground shaking.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a.3. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? There is no identified liquefaction or any other type of ground zones within the city that would increase the risk of loss, injury, or death due to a seismic event.

NO IMPACT
a.4. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?
There is one potential landslide zone identified in the city due to its topography and barely developed soils, the Huntington Gardens property, which is a 207-acre civic use/historic site. The Housing Element update identifies the Huntington property as a potential site for the development of at least 20 units within 2 acres of the site. Should this site be developed in the future, its construction would be subject to strict Building Code regulations in place at the time development is proposed, to prevent any damage due to the existing landslide potential. Since the exact timing and specific nature of the project is speculative at this time, the Housing Element Update will have a less than significant impact due to the adverse effects of landslides.
18

Environmental Checklist
Geology and Soils

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The project is a policy document and would not directly enable construction or development activities. Any future development within the city would be subject to State, regional, and local requirements related to the prevention of substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. However, topsoil is assessed on a project-by-project basis through application of the City's most of the city is developed and not much native topsoil exists where development is encouraged by this project. All projects are, nonetheless, subject to City Code Article 16.10 requiring project sites shall be designed to minimize soil erosion, runoff, and water waste and submittal of a grading plan prepared by a civil engineer. As no specific housing projects are proposed with the project, the Housing Element Update will have no impact to soils erosion or result in the loss of topsoil.

NO IMPACT
c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, laterol spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
As previously mentioned, there are no liquefaction zones and only one landslide area in the city.

Future development is to be evaluated on a site-specific basis and subject to all regulatory requirements on-place. Development codes applicable to projects enabled by the Housing Element Update project is expected to prevent impacts due to construction that would cause a landside, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse of a geologic unit.

NO IMPACT
d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994}, creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? According to soils survey data from the Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy (RMC), the soil types within the City of San Marino are Ramona Loam, Ramona Sandy Loam, Hanford Fine Sandy Loam, and Hanford Gravelly Sandy Loam. None of these soil types are considered to be expansive soils, and therefore along with protective grading standards applicable to development projects, there is no risk to life or property from future housing projects enabled by this Housing Element Update being unsafely located on expansive soils.

NO IMPACT
e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
The soils in the city would be capable of adequately support the use of septic tanks if needed; however, the entire city is served by public sewer systems and the Housing Element Update project would have no impact to wastewater disposal.

NO IMPACT
f Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 19

City of San Marino
lnlllal Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
There are no identified unique paleontological resources or geologic features in the city as identified in the Soils Survey of the San Gabriel Area (1901, Holmes)

NO IMPACT
20

8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the
environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
□
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
□
□
Environmental Checklist
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Less than
Significant
Impact
■
D
No Impact
□
■
The Housing Element update is a policy document consistent with the City's General Plan and does not directly propose physical changes in the environment. The Housing Element update is a Citywide policy document and does not, in and of itself, approve specific future developments. a. Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
The project will not directly generate any GHG emissions; however, it may indirectly generate some GHG emissions as it encourages residential development. Future development of housing units could result in an increase in GHG emissions during both construction and occupancy phases; however, development will be subject to current best management practices and construction to State standards for energy efficient buildings. All construction will be subject to case-specific review by the Building and Fire Department and, in some cases, Design Review which further enforces efficient materials.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The encouragement from this project to build more housing is due to the number of housing units the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) assigned to the City of San Marino. The number, which includes a break-down based on income/affordability levels, was assigned by SCAG by carefully considering their Sustainability Program. This Program is focused on a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) which was developed per the State's Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act, approved in 2008 through Senate's Bill 375. This Act requires local governments to promote development in sustainable locations, preventing large GHG emissions.

Following this principle, the Housing Element update encourages new housing to be built near transit and the principal corridor in the city Huntington Drive, especially for lower income groups. There is no applicable local GHG plan, policy, or regulation.

NO IMPACT
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 21

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Less than
Significant
Potentially with Less than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials? □ □ □ ■
b. Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment? □ □ □ ■
C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within

0.25 mile of an existing or proposed
school? □ □ □ ■
d. Be located on a site that is included on a
list of hazardous material sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment? □ □ □ ■
e. For a project located in an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area? □ □ □ ■
f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? □ □ □ ■
g. Expose people or structures, either
directly or indirectly, to a significant risk
of loss, injury, or death involving wild land
fires? □ □ □ ■
22

Environmental Checklist
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
a. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? The development of new housing units may involve the use and disposal of some materials labeled as hazardous; however, it would be subject to regulations mandated by the State's Building Code and reinforced by the city's own Construction and Demolition Debris Ordinance (found in Article 7 of Chapter IX of the City Code). Said ordinance involves multiple requirements including waste management plans and reporting when deemed necessary by the building officials, in order to prevent any damage to property or the environment.

NO IMPACT
b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
As mentioned in subsection 9-a above, any transportation and disposal of hazardous materials are subject to strict regulations, which do not allow release of hazardous materials into the environment.

Development of the missing housing units in the city would be expected to be phased and not interfere with the existing traffic patterns in a way that an accident would occur and release hazardous materials into the environment.

NO IMPACT
c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school? There are currently four schools within the city, and future development facilitated by this project may occur within 0.25 mile of an existing or future school. However, future development which may involve the transportation of hazardous materials will be subject to rigorous construction and disposal regulations, and potential impacts will be assessed and prevented through project-specific review by city staff.

NO IMPACT
d. Would the project be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No hazardous sites listed under Government Code Section 65962.5 exist within the city.

NO IMPACT
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? There are no airport land use plans within the city, and the closest public use airport is the San Gabriel Valley Airport in El Monte at approximately 4 miles southeast of the city limits.

NO IMPACT
f Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 23

City of San Marino
lnltlal Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
Any future development within the city would be required to comply with the provisions of the San Marino Emergency Operations Plan. The project would also not interfere with the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, as future housing would be scattered across the city and developed in areas already served by existing roads.

NO IMPACT
g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wild/and fires?
There are no wildlands in the city or its immediate vicinity.

NO IMPACT
24

Environmental Checklist
Hydrology and Water Quality
10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Less than
Significant
Potentially with Less than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface
or ground water quality? □ □ □ ■
b. Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin? □ □ □ ■
C. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
(i) Result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site; D □ □ ■
(ii) Substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site; □ D □ ■
(iii) Create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or D □ □ ■
(iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? □ □ □ ■
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation? □ □ D ■
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management
plan? □ □ □ ■
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 25

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Water Supply & Quality
The City of San Marino receives most of its potable water from groundwater sources at the Main San Gabriel and Raymond Basins. Additional water is acquired through purchases from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC), who manages and distributes potable water to public agencies within Los Angeles County and other Southern California counties. MWDSC receives water from the Weymouth Treatment Plant, whose source comes from the Sacramento River Delta and Colorado River. The city is serviced by California American Water, who distributes water to residential and commercial areas and releases an annual water quality report for the jurisdiction.

Surface Water
There is no known naturally occurring surface water feature in San Marino. However, the Rubio Wash, a channelized water feature beginning just west of the San Marino High School baseball field, converges with the Rio Hondo approximately 5 miles to the south. 15.6 percent of water supply is purchased from MWDSC, which is then treated with disinfectants such as chloramines before being distributed to the public.

Ground Water
The city receives 84.4 percent of water supply from groundwater sources. The San Gabriel Basin is the main groundwater source for San Marino and is recharged through rainfall and runoff from adjacent mountains. The groundwater basin also receives imported water and applied water return flows.

Construction from housing development may impact water quality standards and groundwater supply due to temporary debris exposure and runoff during construction. Irrigation of residential landscapes and increased fertilizer use may decrease water quality standards. However, the city's stormwater management and discharge control ordinance 09.07.01 - 09.07.14 require demolition and construction projects to implement best management practices that minimize impacts to water quality. The city also requires permit applicants to show plans consistent with the landscape and irrigation regulations, and requires compliance with city ordinance chapter 23, article 16, sections 1-

11. The Housing Element update is a policy document and will not physically or substantially violate water quality standards.

NO IMPACT
b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
California American Water (CAW) serves the whole City of San Marino and surroundings with the "San Marino System." This system is primarily supplied by groundwater sources in the Main San Gabriel and Raymond Basins. Representatives from CAW confirmed the system has enough water to serve the additional housing units per the new RHNA.

Construction of housing developments may increase total impervious surface areas, leading to cumulative impacts to groundwater recharge. Increased impervious surfaces from new construction can pose a threat to groundwater recharge, potentially drying out a source of recharge and diverting 26

Environmental Checklist
Hydrology and Water Quality
water elsewhere leading to increased water volume in the street that drains into the wash. However, the jurisdiction is entirely developed. In addition, the city encourages permeable surface areas where feasible and drought-tolerant landscaping with little to no irrigation and fertilizer usage for new construction. As such, there is no substantial decrease in groundwater supplies.

NO IMPACT
c.(i) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
The existing drainage pattern is located beneath the surface and would not be substantially altered by construction or lead to substantial erosion.

NO IMPACT
c.(ii) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? The existing drainage pattern is located beneath the surface and would not be substantially altered by construction or lead to increased rate or amount of surface runoff.

NO IMPACT
c.(iii) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
The existing drainage pattern is located beneath the surface and would not be substantially altered by construction or significantly contribute to stormwater runoff.

NO IMPACT
c. (iv) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows? The existing drainage pattern is located beneath the surface and would not be substantially altered by construction or significantly impede flood flows.

NO IMPACT
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
The project site is located approximately 23 miles inland from the ocean and is highly developed. In addition, the City of San Marino has been identified by the federal emergency management agency to be in Zone X, an area of minimal flood risk. As such, flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones do not pose a significant threat of inundation or release of pollutants to the area.

Initial Study - Negative Declaration 27

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update

NO IMPACT
e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The City of San Marino is under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), a semi-autonomous decision-making body under the State Water Resources Control Board who is responsible for the protection of surface water and groundwater quality. The RWQCB's Basin Plan contains policies and directives that protect water quality and its beneficial uses within the region. In addition, the city produced the "Sewer System Management Plan" (May 2019) pursuant to the provisions of the State Water Resources Control Board to manage waste discharge and sanitary sewer overflows The City of San Marino has identified sources of pollution and is enforcing nationwide efforts from the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System by implementing the Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (Ord. 0-05-1181, 9-14-2005). Demolition and construction of residential projects of more than 1,000 square feet and tenant improvements of more than 3,000 square feet are required to divert a minimum of 50% construction debris from a landfill.

In addition, the city adopted the "Model Water Ordinance" that promotes efficient water use through landscaping and irrigation efforts. The Housing Element update is a policy document that responds to the city's needs to fulfill their housing requirements and does not approve any specific projects.

Specific projects are reviewed by the city for consistency with the above-mentioned regulations and plans. As such, the Housing Element update will not obstruct implementation of any water quality control plan or groundwater management plan.

NO IMPACT
28

Land Use and Planning
Hydrology and Water Quality
11 Land Use and Planning
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established
community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
D
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
□
a. Would the project physically divide an established community? Less than
Significant
Impact
D
□
No Impact
•
•
Since the city is characterized predominantly by single-family residences, the updated Housing Element aims to promote infill development where feasible. San Marino's fair share of new housing development (RHNA Allocation) is outlined in the Housing Element, which and encourages infill development near commercial areas, public transportation, and other public services. Goals, policies, and programs of the update emphasize the provision of affordable housing, preventing displacement and preserving the quality of existing neighborhoods. Adoption of the Housing Element would not substantially divide the established community.

NO IMPACT
b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
The Housing Element update is a policy document that encourages infill housing development, affordable housing provisions, and preservation of existing housing stock. The update does not physically cause significant environmental impact to the land use plan, its policies or regulation, and would not grant entitlements for any current or future projects that contribute to the city's projected housing needs.

NO IMPACT
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 29

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
12 Mineral Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a
locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land
use plan?
D
D
D D ■
D D ■
a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
The project proposes some goals and policies to increase the site eligibility for residential in the City; however, no sites that are undeveloped or not zoned for development would be affected by the new measures. Additionally, no mineral resources valuable to the region are known to exist within the City.

NO IMPACT
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? As described in Subsection 12-a above, no valuable mineral resources are known to exist within the City and the project would not have an impact on this matter.

NO IMPACT
30

13 Noise
Would the project result in:
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive ground borne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
□
□
Noise
Hydrology and Water Quality
Less than
Significant
with Less than
Mitigation Significant
Incorporated Impact
□ ■
□ □
□ □
No Impact
□
■
•
a. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Housing is considered a noise-sensitive rather than a noise-generating land use. The primary source of ambient noise in San Marino's residential neighborhoods is traffic. The Housing Element is a policy document and does not propose specific projects; rather, it outlines density requirements per RHNA allocations. Any future housing development projects would be subject to the General Plan Land Use and Noise policies and limits, as well as Zoning regulations and setbacks, Building Code requirements, standard conditions of approval, and project-specific environmental review as applicable. As such, the update will not result in substantial increase in ambient noise or vibration levels in the city.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
The city's general plan has identified traffic as being the main contributors to noise in neighboring residential areas. However, existing traffic noise is not considered to be a significant impact on new residential construction. In addition, the city's general plan includes a noise element technical analysis that measured noise levels throughout specific sites of San Marino. The analysis concluded that noise levels along Huntington Drive are within a range considered conditionally acceptable for sensitive land Initial Study - Negative Declaration 31

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
uses. Temporary noise levels and groundborne vibrations from new development as allocated by RHNA goals may impact the environment; however, as stated above, the general plan's noise element contains provisions for monitoring and mitigating noise impacts to sensitive land uses such as residential, library and schools. The Housing Element update in and of itself will not result in generation of excessive groundborne noise and vibration levels.

NO IMPACT
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
There are no public airports, private airstrips, or airport land use plan areas within the City; nor within two miles from the City limits.

NO IMPACT
32

Noise
Population and Housing
14 Population and Housing
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (e.g., through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
□
□
□ ■ □
D □ ■
a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
San Marino had a population of 13,048 persons in 2019 (US Census, 2019); this population has been relatively stable since 1970 when San Marino was built out. The draft housing element update includes goals to maintain the existing housing stock while providing housing opportunities for all income levels within the City. To accomplish the City's fair share of RHNA goals, a total of 397 units would need to be built through the provision of ADU/ JADUs and with future consideration of limited rezoning efforts to allow for increased density. The Housing Element update is a policy document and does not propose specific development projects. Rather, it outlines policy provisions and recommendations for accommodating RHNA goals and does not induce substantial unplanned population growth either directly or indirectly.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The project would not displace any people, as the update is proposing measures to increase the potential for housing within the City. Under state laws, if a development project were to be proposed on a site where existing housing units occupied by low-income households exist, special relocation measures would be required to avoid displacement. Substantial numbers of existing people of housing would not be affected by this Housing Element Update.

NO IMPACT
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 33

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
15 Public Services
Less than
Significant
Potentially with Less than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
a. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, or the need for
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
1 Fire protection? □ □ ■ □
2 Police protection? □ □ ■ □
3 Schools? □ □ ■ □
4 Parks? □ □ ■ □
5 Other public facilities? □ □ ■ □
a.1. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities, or the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives?
The housing element update is a policy document that increases opportunities for the provision of housing within the city, but it does not approve specific development projects in and of itself. Sitespecific housing development occurs through the city's permitting system and includes an evaluation of the sufficiency of local fire protection resources. Housing development necessitates nearby fire hydrants to mitigate adverse impacts to structures but would not require additional fire protection facilities due to the city's built-out nature. Therefore, the housing element update does not require additional fire protection facilities and does not result in substantial adverse impacts to the facilities.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a.2. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities, or the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives?
34

Public Services
Population and Housing
The housing element update will not result in substantial adverse impacts to police protection facilities.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a.3. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered schools, or the need for new or physically altered schools, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives? The housing element update will not result in substantial adverse impacts to school or the provision thereof. New construction is required to pay school impact fees to the local school district which are used to maintain the level of services.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a.4. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered parks, or the need for new or physically altered parks, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives? The housing element update will not result in substantial adverse impacts to the provision or construction of parks.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
a.5. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of other new or physically altered public facilities, or the need for other new or physically altered public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives?

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 35
The housing element update will not result in substantial adverse impacts to public facilities as it will consist of in-fill development with adequate infrastructure to serve future development.

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
16 Recreation
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
□
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
□
□
Less than
Significant
Impact
□
□
No Impact
•
•
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
The city contains two parks dedicated for open space and recreation: Huntington Gardens and Lacey Park. The 237 acres of open space provides a space for residents and visitors to recreate. The housing element update allows provisions for the projected increase of housing units, which may lead to increased usage of nearby parks and open space. Lacey Park is managed by the city's Community Services Department and the recreation facilities are managed under a reservation system to limit large groups, and the trails are paved to limit physical degradation. As such, projected increases in housing units as outlined in the housing element will not lead to substantial physical deterioration.

NO IMPACT
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Adoption of the housing element update does not include construction of any facilities and thus would not have a physical impact on the environment.

NO IMPACT
36

17 Transportation
Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance,
or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway,
bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant
Impact
D
■
D
■
Transportation
Recreation
a. Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? The proposed housing element update, being a plan level document creating no new physical features, would not conflict with programs, plans, ordinances, or other policies related to circulation.

Future development influenced by the updated housing element would be created in already developed areas. There would be no impact from the proposed project.

NO IMPACT
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
The proposed housing element update, being a plan level document creating no new physical features, would not conflict with the CEQA guidelines outlined in section 15064.3, subdivision (b). The adoption of the updated housing element would not result in the direct creation of traffic or the addition of Vehicle Miles Travelled. The impact of the proposed housing element update would be less than significant.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)? The proposed housing element update would not create any physical features or cause changes to the existing transportation infrastructure. The proposed project could result in Initial Study - Negative Declaration 37
No Impact
■
D
■
□

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
the future development of new housing; however, because the City of San Marino is already completely developed, no new roads would be required to serve this future development.

There would be no impact from the proposed housing element update.

NO IMPACT
d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? The proposed housing element would not create any physical structures or other features requiring emergency services. Future housing development influenced by the proposed housing element would be located in already developed areas with established emergency services and access. Impacts from the proposed housing element would be less than significant.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
38

18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
or cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native American
tribe, and that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 5020.l{k)?
b. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native
American tribe.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
D
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
□
□
Transportation
Tribal Cultural Resources
Less than
Significant
Impact
■
■
No Impact
D
□
a - b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change to a resource listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.l{k), or a resource determined to be significant pursuant to Public Resources Code section 5024.1
The City of San Marino is completely developed, leaving no undisturbed areas. The proposed housing element would not create any physical features and has no potential to impact tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074, a resource listed in a state or local historical register as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.l{k). Tribal consultation was not requested in the preparation of this document. Future development influenced by the housing element has the potential to unearth previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources. However, standard project conditions of approval would require that any newly discovered resources be protected, and that work be halted while the new discovery is addressed. No tribal cultural resources Initial Study - Negative Declaration 39

City of San Marino
lnltlal Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
in the City have been identified by the lead agency as being significant. Therefore, the proposed housing element would have a less than significant impact to tribal cultural resources.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
40

Transportation
Utilities and Service Systems
19 Utilities and Service Systems
Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to
the provider's existing commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
□
□
□
□
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
□
□
□
□
□
Less than
Significant
Impact
■
■
■
■
■
No Impact
□
□
□
□
□
a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
The proposed housing element update; being a plan level document with no construction components, would not result in the creation of new utility and service system facilities. Future construction influenced by the proposed housing element has the potential to require connections to natural gas, wastewater treatment and other services typical of residential development. However, any future development would be infill and would be served by infrastructure that is already in place.

Impacts to utilities and service systems would be less than significant.

Initial Study - Negative Declaration 41

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? The proposed housing element update would create no new residences or other construction requiring water usage. Water supplies would not be affected by the implementation of the proposed housing element update. Future development influenced by the housing element would require water. However, sufficient supply is available to meet the demand and is expected to be sufficient even in drier years. Impacts from the proposed housing element would be less than significant.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
The proposed housing element update would create no new construction or result in new demand for wastewater services. Future construction that may result from the proposed housing element update would require sewer services. The Sanitation District overseeing the area has expressed confidence that the projected new demand would not exceed their ability to provide services. Impacts from the proposed housing element would be less than significant.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
d. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
The proposed housing element update would create no new construction or result in new demand for solid waste services. Future development influenced by the proposed housing element would require solid waste services. However, it is not expected that the projected increase in housing will create a demand for solid waste services that would exceed the capacity of local infrastructure.

Impacts from the proposed housing element update would be less than significant.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
The proposed housing element update would not create any demand for solid waste services. Future development would require solid waste services. Future development would be required to comply with all federal, state, and local guidelines regarding solid waste. Impacts from the proposed housing element update would have a less than significant impact.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
42

20 Wildfire
If located in or near State responsibility areas
or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones, would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks and
thereby expose project occupants to
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslopes or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire slope instability,
or drainage changes?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
Wildfire
Utilities and Service Systems
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
No Impact
■
■
■
■
a. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The City of San Marino is not located within a State Responsibility Area (SRA) or within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone {VHFHSZ) as classified by CAL FIRE. No SRA or VHFHSZ exists within two miles of the city. The proposed housing element update would not alter any physical infrastructure or other features that could have an impact on emergency responses. There would be no impact from the proposed housing element update.

NO IMPACT
b. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire Initial Study - Negative Declaration 43

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
The City of San Marino is not located within a State Responsibility Area (SRA) or within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone {VHFHSZ) as classified by CAL FIRE. No SRA or VHFHSZ exists within two miles of the city. The proposed housing element update would not directly create any new development or other physical features. Fire hazards would not be exacerbated as a result of the project. There would be no impact from the proposed housing element update.

NO IMPACT
c. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? The City of San Marino is not located within a State Responsibility Area (SRA) or within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone {VHFHSZ) as classified by CAL FIRE. No SRA or VHFHSZ exists within two miles of the city. No physical development would be created as a result of the housing element update. Any housing development influenced by the housing element update would be infill and would be served by infrastructure that is already in place. There would be no impact from the proposed housing element update.

NO IMPACT
d. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downs/opes or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
The City of San Marino is not located within a State Responsibility Area (SRA) or within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone {VHFHSZ) as classified by CAL FIRE. No SRA or VHFHSZ exists within two miles of the city. The housing element update is a policy document and would not create or give entitlements to any individual project. No component of the project would exacerbate the risk of wildfire or create additional post-fire hazards. There would be no impact from the proposed housing element update.

NO IMPACT
44

Mandatory Findings of Significance
Utilities and Service Systems
21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
Does the project:
a. Have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce
the number, or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b. Have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that
the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
c. Have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
D
D
D
□ ■ D
D D ■
D ■ D
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The proposed project is a policy document meant to regulate and facilitate the creation of housing.

The project would not create any housing or other physical development. The project would not permit any project or grant any entitlements for future projects. Future development of sites identified for housing would not have significant effects on biological or historical resources for the reasons outlined in the above study. Impacts from the project would be less than significant.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Initial Study - Negative Declaration 45

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? The proposed project is a policy document meant to regulate and facilitate the creation of housing.

The project would not create any housing or other physical development. No cumulatively considerable impacts could result from the proposed project. Future housing development influenced by the project may have the potential to cause impacts to the environment, however such future projects are unknown and attempting to evaluate future impacts would be speculative. There would be no significant impacts from the proposed Housing Element Update project.

NO IMPACT
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
The proposed project is a policy document meant to regulate and facilitate the creation of housing.

The project would not create any housing or other physical development. As outlined in the above study, the project would have no significant impacts or substantial adverse impacts to human beings.

Impacts from the proposed project would' be less than significant.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
46

References
References
Bibliography
[ ]
California American Water 2020 Annual Water Quality Report (https://www.amwater.com/ccr/sanmarino.pdf)
City of San Marino 2001 General Plan
(https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/Final%20General%20Plan.pdf) City of San Marino Public Works
(https:ljwww.cityofsanmarino.org/government/departments/parks public works Iwate IJIBQ)
City of San Marino Sewer Management Plan May 2019
(https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/Parks%20&%20Public%20Works/Sewer'/o20System%20 Management%20Plan.pdf)
Environmental Protection Agency 2014 Basin Plan (https://www.epa.gov/sites/defau1t/files/2015- 03/documents/ca4-losangeles-region.pdf)
Main San Gabriel Basin (https:Uwww.watermaster.org/basin-map) Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (https://thehawkinscompany.com/wpcontent/uploads/2021/01/metro water district v6.pdf) Soil Survey of the San Gabriel Area, California, 1901.
(https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/california/sangabrie1CA1901/sang abrielCA1901.pdf)
US Census 2019 (https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/sanmarinocitycalifornia) List of Preparers
4LEAF, Inc. and McNulty Consulting prepared this IS-ND under contract to the City of San Marino.

Persons involved in data gathering analysis, project management, and quality control are listed below.
4LEAF, INC.

Eduardo Hernandez, Senior Planner
Elliott Pickett, Associate Planner
Nick Bateman, Associate Planner
Denise Truong, Assistant Planner
Jane Riley, AICP, Director of Housing Policy
Toccarra Thomas, AICP, Deputy Director of Planning Services Initial Study - Negative Declaration 47

City of San Marino
Initial Study for 2021-2029 Housing Element Update

MCNULTY CONSULTING
Bret McNulty, Principal
48

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

RESOLUTION NO. R-22-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
MARINO, ADOPTING THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT (SIXTH

CYCLE) OF THE SAN MARINO GENERAL PLAN AND APPROVING
THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE INITIAL STUDY AND

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WHEREAS, Government Code § 65580 et seq. requires the City of San Marino to periodically prepare and update its Housing Element in its General Plan. The City’s Housing Element establishes goals, policies, and programs to accommodate the maintenance and expansion of the City’s housing supply; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Marino’s 2021-2029 Draft Housing Element includes updated data in compliance with state housing laws and a variety of programs and strategies to address citywide housing needs and priorities; and
WHEREAS, the 2021-2029 Draft Housing Element - dated November 1, 2021 (attached as Exhibit A) involved an extensive public outreach campaign including a Planning Commission workshop on February 24, 2021, and City Council workshops/presentations on April 16, 2021, July 14th, 2021, August 3rd, 2021, and September 24, 2021, and was prepared based on input from the City Council, Planning Commission, and public comments; and WHEREAS, on October 29, 2021, the City Council directed staff to submit the Draft Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to include additional edits summarized in the Staff Report (attached as Exhibit B); and WHEREAS, the Housing Element was circulated to HCD on November 1, 2021 for a 60-day HCD review; and
WHEREAS, on December 31, 2021, HCD provided its 60-day comments to the City of San Marino 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Draft Housing Element via email on December 31, 2021 (the HCD letter is attached as Exhibit C); and
WHEREAS, City staff and the City’s Housing Consultant reviewed the comments from HCD and have made conforming edits and changes and incorporated comments and responses as reflected in Exhibit D (Edits to November 1, 2021 Draft Housing Element); and WHEREAS, the 2021-2029 Housing Element was reviewed for consistency with the City’s General Plan and San Marino Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the 2021-2029 Housing Element was prepared pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq., CEQA Guidelines § 15070, and the City of San Marino Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA, assessing the potential environmental impacts that might result from the adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element, and the City determined that there was no substantial evidence that adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element may have a significant effect on the

CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-22-06

environment. The Initial Study and Negative Declaration is incorporated by reference as Exhibit E; and
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, at which time it considered all material and evidence, whether written or oral and adopted Planning Commission Resolution PCR-22-01, recommending that the City Council adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element (Sixth Cycle) of the San Marino General Plan and approve the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update Initial Study and Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the 2021-2029 Final Housing Element Update identifies and analyzes the current and future housing needs of residents within the City of San Marino and establishes housing goals, policies, and programs to meet the needs; and WHEREAS, The City prepared an Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND - No. 2021-01) for the proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element and related actions in accordance with CEQA Guidelines, Section 15070; and
WHEREAS, the documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the General Plan is located in the Planning Division; and WHEREAS, the proposed 2021-2029 Final Housing Element Update is consistent with the City of San Marino General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 2021-2029 Final Housing Element update meets the requirements of state law (Government Code Section 65880 et seq.) and associated regulations relating to Housing Elements; and
WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of state law, the proposed 2021-2029 Final Housing Element Update identifies and analyzes the current and future housing needs within the City of San Marino and identifies goals, policies and programs to provide certain services and ensure adequate opportunities for housing of all income levels for the planning period set by the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Marino has met all legal requirements for public outreach and obtaining public input relating to the proposed 2021-2029 Final Housing Element Update; and WHEREAS, before approving the 2021-2029 Final Housing Element Update, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on February 9, 2022 in which all those who wished to speak were given the opportunity to do so; and
WHEREAS, in addition, before approving the 2021-2029 Final Housing Element Update, the City Council considered all evidence in the record, including written comments and public comments.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares that the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and incorporated into this resolution as findings of the City Council.

CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-22-06

SECTION 2. The City of San Marino City Council amends the General Plan to incorporate the Final 2021-2029 (Sixth Cycle) Housing Element Update attached hereto as Exhibit F.

SECTION 3. The City of San Marino City Council finds, based upon the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Negative Declaration reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis, and the Negative Declaration is adopted.

SECTION 4. The City Council hereby directs staff to submit the 2021-2029 Housing Element to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for certification.

SECTION 5. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. Effective Date: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 9
th day of February, 2022.

SUSAN JAKUBOWSKI, MAYOR

ATTEST:

CHRISTINA BAKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-22-06

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Christina Baker, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-22-06 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a regular meeting held on the 9
th day of February, 2022, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

CHRISTINA BAKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
• Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The following presents the financial activity of the City for the quarter ended December 31, 2021 as well as the fiscal year-to-date financial information. These figures are unaudited and have been compiled by the Finance Department. Financial information as noted at December 31, 2020 has been included for comparative purposes.

DISCUSSION
The Second Quarter (October 2021 through December 2021) was the seventh reporting period that the City felt the fiscal impact due to the COVID-19 pandemic as it starts to rebound back to pre-pandemic levels. During the Second Quarter of 2022, General Fund revenues increased by $229k or 2.8% versus the Second Quarter of 2021. While tax revenues overall remained strong and intact, Charges for Services rebounded as the Community Services Department has resumed services after being closed for a majority of the prior year.

Total General Fund expenses for the quarter increased by $305k or 12.1% compared to last year.

Expenses have increased mostly due to the staffing levels at various departments returning to budgeted levels.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: Paul Chung, Finance Director
Mark Siegfried, Accounting Manager/Controller
DATE: February 9, 2022
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR SECOND
QUARTER (OCTOBER 2021 THROUGH DECEMBER 2021)
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

To summarize, the Second Quarter revenues and expenditures came in as expected as the local economy continues to recover from the economic impacts of COVID-19. The City’s overall financial status is stable and continues to remain robust. Additional second quarter details are provided in the tables below.

Second Quarter 2022 versus Second Quarter 2021 Financial Information Below is a snapshot of the revenues and expenditures for the General Fund (Fund 101), the Public Safety Fund (Fund 103), and all of the Special Revenue Funds.

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (UNRESTRICTED)
General Fund (101) Second Quarter Second Quarter
Revenues 2022 2021 $$$ %
Taxes 7,822,297 7,675,677 146,620 1.9% Note 1
Licenses & Permits 211,093 173,343 37,749 21.8%
Charges for Service 278,054 130,119 147,935 113.7% Note 2 Intergovernmental 10,000 101,082 (91,082) -90.1% Note 3 Fines & Forfeitures 6,849 72,415 (65,566) -90.5% Note 4 Money & Property 84,823 100,495 (15,672) -15.6% Note 5
Miscellaneous 82,248 12,773 69,475 543.9% Note 6
General Fund Total Revenues 8,495,365 8,265,905 229,460 2.8% Second Quarter Second Quarter
Expenses 2022 2021 $$$ %
City Council 1,612 866 746 86.1%
City Attorney 201,408 59,733 141,675 237.2%
Non-Departmental 525,126 342,388 182,738 53.4%
City Manager's Office 142,151 180,313 (38,161) -21.2%
Human Resources 94,015 81,980 12,036 14.7%
Finance Department 167,216 172,820 (5,604) -3.2%
Community Development 371,998 370,676 1,322 0.4%
Emergency Services 26,370 5,120 21,249 415.0%
Parks and Public Works 686,272 825,224 (138,953) -16.8% Recreation Department 273,919 211,538 62,381 29.5%
Library Department 343,374 277,424 65,949 23.8%
El Molino Viejo - - 0 0.0%
General Fund Total Expenses 2,833,462 2,528,083 305,379 12.1% Note 7 Net Income-General Fund 5,661,903 5,737,822 (75,919) -1.3% Public Safety Fund (103) Second Quarter Second Quarter
Revenues 2022 2021 $$$ %
Taxes 1,436,774 1,423,607 13,167 0.9%
Charges for Service 137,379 118,636 18,743 15.8%
Intergovernmental 6,378 2,624 3,755 143.1%
Fines & Fees 11,428 8,999 2,429 27.0%
Miscellaneous 11,619 654 10,966 1677.7% Note 8
1,603,578 1,554,520 49,058 3.2%
Second Quarter Second Quarter
Expenses 2022 2021 $$$ %
Police Department 1,595,814 1,393,051 202,763 14.6% Note 9 Fire Department 1,319,217 1,128,854 190,363 16.9% Note 10 2,915,031 2,521,905 393,126 15.6%
Net Income-Public Safety Fund (1,311,453) (967,385) (344,068) -35.6%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (RESTRICTED)
Second Quarter Second Quarter
2022 2021 $$$ %
Revenues 554,589 515,441 39,148 7.6%
Expenses 35,116 4,568 30,549 668.8% Note 11
Net Income-Special Revenue Funds 519,473 510,874 8,600 1.7% Total Revenues-All Funds 10,849,363 10,462,955 386,408 3.7% Total Expenses-All Funds 6,210,630 6,111,818 98,811 1.6% Net Income-All Funds 4,638,733 4,351,137 287,596 6.6%
CY vs PY
CY vs PY
CY vs PY
CY vs PY
CY vs PY

Items of Note:

1. Increase in Taxes is due to property taxes increasing by $162k compared to last year while franchise taxes decreased by $21k compared to the prior year.

2. Increase in Charges for Service is due to City facilities being open compared to the prior year when they were closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. First, Recreation Division charges increased by $53k due to contract classes and family life programs being open.

Second, the Library saw an increase of $38k mostly due to passport processing. Third, charges from Community Development increased by $57k due to Plan Check Fees and Business Application Fees as demand for these services remain high.

3. Decrease in Intergovernmental revenues is due to a one-time reimbursement related to the CARES Act to fund COVID-19 expenses incurred by the City in the prior year.

4. Decrease in Fines & Forfeitures is due to the fact that the City did not levy any large Tree Fines in the current year. In the prior year, there were 2 tree fines that exceeded $25k each. The City continues to have more compliance with the City’s Tree Ordinance.

5. Decrease in Money & Property is due to interest rates continuing to decrease producing less interest income on City-held investments. This trend is expected for the remainder of the year as rates continue to remain at historic lows.

6. Increase in Miscellaneous Revenues is due to a $71,355 reimbursement from CJPIA for the City’s share of Liability Insurance refunds owed to its members.

7. Increase in Non-sworn Department expenses of $305k is due to the following reasons:
a. The Recreation Division had an increase of $62k over prior year due to salary savings that the City had last year due to COVID-19 related closures of various classes and activities.
b. The Library Division had an increase of $66k over prior year due to salary savings that the City had last year due to COVID-19 related closures of various classes and activities.
c. The City has incurred $123k of legal expenses related to COVID-19 matters that it did not incur in the prior year.
d. There was an extra pay period during the quarter.

8. Increase in Miscellaneous Public Safety Fund Revenues is due to a $11k Strike Team reimbursement received in the current year related to the Beckwourth Fire.

9. Increase in Police Department expenses of $203k is due to the following reasons:
a. The Department incurred $35k of crossing guard services that it did not incur last year due to school closures.
b. There was an extra pay period in the quarter compared to last year causing an increase of salary expenses of $130k.
c. Salaries increased due to annual cost of living wage increases of 2% as stated in the various Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs).

10. Increase in Fire Department expenses of $190k is due to the following reasons:
a. The Department incurred $30k of overtime related to Strike Team assignments which are reimbursable by the State.
b. There was an extra pay period in the quarter compared to last year causing an increase of salary expenses of $95k.
c. The Department had an additional $27k of workers compensation expenses compared to the prior year.
d. Salaries increased due to annual cost of living wage increases of 2% as stated in the various MOUs.

11. Increase in expenses related to Special Revenue Funds is due to a reimbursement to the San Marino Unified School District for Prop A Metro eligible expenses. Due to school closures, there were no Prop A expenses in the prior year.

December 2021 YTD versus December 2020 YTD Financial Information Below is a snapshot of the year-to-date revenues and expenditures for the General Fund (Fund 101), the Public Safety Fund (Fund 103) and all of the Special Revenue Funds.

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (UNRESTRICTED)
General Fund (101)
Revenues YTD PY YTD $$$ %
Taxes 8,820,565 8,596,342 224,222 2.6% Note 1
Licenses & Permits 447,483 427,412 20,071 4.7%
Charges for Service 541,766 294,416 247,350 84.0% Note 2 Intergovernmental 24,594 196,016 (171,422) -87.5% Note 3 Fines & Forfeitures (20,741) 130,710 (151,451) -115.9% Note 4 Money & Property 149,942 159,108 (9,166) -5.8%
Miscellaneous 87,375 23,220 64,155 276.3%
General Fund Total Revenues 10,050,985 9,827,225 223,759 2.3% Expenses YTD PY YTD $$$ %
City Council 13,416 14,371 (955) -6.6%
City Attorney 227,659 79,211 148,448 187.4%
Non-Departmental 816,332 503,429 312,903 62.2%
City Manager's Office 328,297 368,545 (40,248) -10.9%
Human Resources 194,107 195,547 (1,440) -0.7%
Finance Department 395,589 416,158 (20,569) -4.9%
Community Development 760,974 805,418 (44,444) -5.5%
Emergency Services 41,069 12,756 28,313 222.0%
Parks and Public Works 1,387,041 1,718,029 (330,987) -19.3% Recreation Department 637,909 474,445 163,464 34.5%
Library Department 726,266 661,301 64,965 9.8%
El Molino Viejo 56,000 56,000 0 0.0%
General Fund Total Expenses 5,584,660 5,305,209 279,451 5.3% Note 5 Net Income-General Fund 4,466,324 4,522,016 (55,692) -1.2% Public Safety Fund (103)
Revenues YTD PY YTD $$$ %
Taxes 1,452,833 1,437,247 15,586 1.1%
Charges for Service 263,866 246,006 17,860 7.3%
Intergovernmental 6,378 2,902 3,476 119.8%
Fines & Fees 26,787 12,410 14,377 115.9%
Miscellaneous 11,959 81,149 (69,189) -85.3% Note 6
1,761,824 1,779,714 (17,890) -1.0%
Expenses YTD PY YTD $$$ %
Police Department 3,844,713 3,613,029 231,684 6.4% Note 7 Fire Department 3,459,189 3,266,837 192,352 5.9% Note 8 7,303,902 6,879,866 424,036 6.2%
Net Income-Public Safety Fund (5,542,078) (5,100,152) (441,926) -8.7%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (RESTRICTED)
YTD PY YTD $$$ %
Revenues 763,314 718,135 45,179 6.3%
Expenses 1,935,254 956,005 979,250 102.4% Note 9
Net Income-Special Revenue Funds (1,171,941) (237,870) (934,071) -392.7% Total Revenues-All Funds 12,945,107 12,569,815 375,293 3.0% Total Expenses-All Funds 17,467,638 16,483,482 984,155 6.0% Net Income-All Funds (4,522,530) (3,913,668) (608,863) -15.6% CY vs PY
CY vs PY
CY vs PY
CY vs PY
CY vs PY

Items of Note:

1. Increase in Taxes is due to property taxes increasing by $166k compared to last year while franchise taxes decreased by $21k compared to the prior year. Sales taxes, and property transfer taxes have increased $37k and $50k respectively compared to last year.

2. Increase in Charges for Service is due to City facilities being open compared to the prior year when they were closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. First, Recreation Division charges increased by $85k due to contract classes and family life programs being open.

Second, the Library saw an increase of $83k mostly due to passport processing. Third, charges from Community Development increased by $80k due to Plan Check Fees and Business Application Fees.

3. Decrease in Intergovernmental is due to the City receiving $181k in COVID-19 reimbursements as part of the CARES Act in the prior year.

4. Decrease in Fines & Forfeitures revenues is due to less large tree fines greater than $10k being paid in the current year (zero) compared to the prior year (five). Due to outreach efforts regarding the City’s tree ordinances with homeowners, it has resulted in fewer violations.

5. Increase in non-sworn department expenses of $279k (or 5.3%) is due to the following reasons. First, there were salary savings compared in the prior year due to closures of the Recreation and Library Divisions. Total expenses for these two divisions have increased by $228k. Second, the City has incurred $123k of legal expenses related to COVID-19 matters that it did not incur in the prior year. Staff is anticipating current year expenditures to be higher than prior year as City services slowly return to pre-pandemic levels.

6. Decrease in Miscellaneous Revenues for the Public Safety Fund is due to Strike Team Reimbursements for the Bobcat Fire in the prior year of $80k. The Fire Department has received only one Strike Team Reimbursement during the current year for the Beckwourth Fire ($11k).

7. Increase in Total Expenses for the Police Department is due to three reasons. First, the Department incurred $47k of crossing guard services that it did not incur last year due to school closures. Second, the City’s Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) related to pensions for police increased $144k when compared to last year. Third, salaries and salary related expenses have increased by 2% due to the new MOU’s which took effect July 1, 2019.

8. Increase in Total Expenses for the Fire Department is due to two reasons. First, salaries and salary related expenses have increased due to the new MOU’s which took effect July

1, 2019. Second, the City’s Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) related to pensions for fire personnel increased $146k when compared to last year.

9. Increase in expenses related to Special Revenue Funds is due to the timing of payment related to the Street Rehabilitation Project and when work was completed.

All Funds Revenue Summary at December 31, 2021
In the next summary, budgeted revenues are shown against actual revenue at December 31, 2021 and in comparison to the prior year at this same time period.

Adopted Year-to-Date Increase/(Decrease) Prior Year
Budget Actual % v. Prior Year Actual
General Funds Group
General Fund 26,795,644 10,050,985 38% 223,759 9,827,225 Public Safety Fund 4,434,068 1,761,824 40% (17,890) 1,779,714 Fourth of July 61,715 15,875 26% 15,875 0
San Marino Center 0 0 0% 0 0
Donations to City 79,750 20,923 26% 2,389 18,533
Total General Fund 31,371,177 11,849,606 38% 224,134 11,625,473 Special Revenue Funds
Gas Taxes 611,589 256,330 42% (9,117) 265,447
CDBG 0 10,985 0% 4,515 6,470
County Park Prop A 0 0 0% (7,657) 7,657
Prop A Transit 268,285 107,911 40% 16,513 91,397
Drought 700 46 7% (86) 132
Air Quality (AQMD) 19,500 4,086 21% (780) 4,866
STPL 0 405 0% (747) 1,152
TDA 9,597 9,000 94% 9,000 0
Prop C Transit 223,718 89,830 40% 12,233 77,596
PEG Fees 33,400 7,597 23% (630) 8,227
Asset Forfeiture 500 76 15% (141) 217
Granada Ave. 0 0 0% 0 0
Used Oil Grant 0 25 0% (47) 72
OTS Gant 119,100 0 0% 0 0
Recycling 1,000 290 29% (535) 824
COPS 164,300 134,897 82% 1,824 133,073
Homeland Security Grant 51,789 0 0% (1,502) 1,502
County Measure R 166,413 66,325 40% 10,842 55,483
County Measure M 187,335 75,510 40% 11,493 64,017
Total Special Revenue Funds 1,857,226 763,314 41% 45,179 718,135 Capital Project Fund
Capital Projects 25,000 25,000 100% 25,000 0
Internal Service Fund
Capital Equipment 607,927 306,963 50% 81,700 225,264
Total Internal Service Funds 607,927 306,963 50% 81,700 225,264 Total All Revenue 33,861,330 12,944,884 38% 376,012 12,568,872 All Revenue by Fund
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete

All Funds Expenditure Summary at December 31, 2021
In the next summary, budgeted expenditures are shown against actual expenditures at December 31, 2021 and in comparison to the prior year at this same time period.

Adopted Year-to-Date Increase/(Decrease) Prior Year
Budget Actual % v. Prior Year Actual
General Funds Group
General Fund 13,054,117 5,584,660 43% 279,451 5,305,209 Public Safety Fund 13,365,223 7,303,902 55% 424,036 6,879,866 Fourth of July 104,553 80,124 77% 80,124 0
San Marino Center 0 201 100% 201 0
Donations to City 52,750 11,682 22% (85,243) 96,925
Workers' Compensation 593,206 373,355 63% 61,315 312,040 General Liability 760,813 746,844 98% (30,908) 777,752
Total General Fund 27,930,662 14,100,769 50% 728,975 13,371,794 Special Revenue Funds
Gas Taxes 1,765,467 1,375,000 78% 885,210 489,790
CDBG 0 12,643 100% 6,174 6,470
County Park Prop A 0 5,667 100% 5,520 147
Prop A Transit 233,802 28,745 12% 29,540 (795)
Air Quality 97,400 0 0% 0 0
Drought 0 0 0% 0 0
TDA 9,000 0 0% 0 0
Prop C Transit 5,000 300,000 6000% 300,000 0
OTS Grant 119,100 2,367 2% 2,367 0
Used Oil Grant 0 0 0% 0 0
COPS 82,700 60,832 74% 40,439 20,393
Homeland Security Grant 51,789 0 0% 0 0
County Measure R 485,000 150,000 31% (25,097) 175,097
County Measure M 0 0 100% (264,903) 264,903
Total Special Revenue 2,849,258 1,935,254 68% 979,250 956,005 Capital Projects Funds
Capital Projects 12,654,418 833,213 7% (578,003) 1,411,216 Debt Service Funds
Debt Service 531,712 531,712 100% 17,983 513,729
Internal Service Funds
Capital Equipment 507,931 66,690 13% (164,049) 230,739
Total Expenditures 44,473,981 17,467,638 39% 984,155 16,483,482 All Expenditures by Fund
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
This report possesses no fiscal impact and requires no procurement review.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that this report be received and filed. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the financial report reflecting the City’s revenues and expenditures as of December 31, 2021.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Revenue Summary Report at December 31, 2021

2. Expenditure Summary Report at December 31, 2021

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (UNRESTRICTED)
General Fund (101)
Taxes
Property Taxes 17,939,000 7,437,199 41% 7,271,101 166,097 2% Sales Taxes 400,000 131,673 33% 94,658 37,015 39%
Franchise Taxes 662,000 150,682 23% 171,576 (20,894) -12% Property Transfer Taxes 180,000 121,108 67% 71,282 49,825 70% Utility Users Taxes 1,756,000 786,839 45% 787,565 (726) 0% Business License Taxes 415,000 193,065 47% 200,160 (7,095) -4% Subtotal Taxes 21,352,000 8,820,565 41% 8,596,342 224,222 3% Licenses & Permits
Street & Curb Permits 250,000 79,062 32% 105,033 (25,972) -25% Building Permits 511,000 327,952 64% 302,372 25,579 8%
Tree Permits 40,000 24,830 62% 15,120 9,710 64%
Bicycle Licenses 0 0 100% 4 (4) -100%
Film Permits 13,000 15,640 120% 4,883 10,757 220%
Subtotal Licenses & Permits 814,000 447,483 55% 427,412 20,071 5% Charges for Service
Administration 250 343 137% 319 25 8%
Planning & Building Department 335,400 231,833 69% 152,288 79,545 52% Public Works, Streets, Parks Department 132,000 55,303 42% 55,338 (35) 0% Recreation Department 498,044 147,413 30% 62,582 84,831 136% Library Department 183,100 106,875 58% 23,891 82,984 347% Subtotal Charges for Service 1,148,794 541,766 47% 294,416 247,350 84% Intergovernmental
VLF 10,200 0 0% 0 0 0%
VLF Swap (Motor Vehicle In-Lieu) 1,889,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
COVID-19 Reimbursements 1,200,000 10,000 1% 181,875 (171,875) -95% Cenic Rebates 14,100 14,594 104% 14,141 453 3%
Subtotal Intergovernmental 3,113,300 24,594 1% 196,016 (171,422) -87% Fines & Forfeitures
Fines & Fees 100 949 949% 50 899 1799%
Tree Fines 15,000 (27,365) -182% 118,420 (145,785) -123% Business License NOVs 6,500 5,675 87% 12,240 (6,565) -54% Subtotal Fines & Forfeitures 21,600 (20,741) -96% 130,710 (151,451) -116% Money & Property
Rentals - PW 500 2,160 432% 0 2,160 0%
Rents & Concessions - Park 125,000 81,064 65% 58,798 22,266 38% Rents & Concessions - Recreation 4,850 750 15% 1,392 (642) -46% Library Rentals 0 785 0% 0 785 0%
Interest Income 180,000 65,183 36% 98,918 (33,735) -34% Subtotal Money & Property 310,350 149,942 48% 159,108 (9,166) -6% Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous 15,000 6,480 43% 5,627 853 15%
Damage to City Property 10,000 8,998 90% 11,272 (2,274) -20% Sale of Property 6,500 138 2% 6,320 (6,182) -98%
City Reimbursements 100 71,364 71364% 0 71,364 0%
Old Mill Reimbursements 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Miscellaneous - Library 4,000 395 10% 1 394 39389%
Subtotal Miscellaneous 35,600 87,375 245% 23,220 64,155 276% 26,795,644 10,050,985 38% 9,827,225 223,759 2%
Public Safety Fund (103)
Taxes
Property Taxes 3,422,818 1,388,509 41% 1,381,406 7,103 1% Augmentation Fund 174,500 64,324 37% 55,841 8,483 15%
Subtotal Taxes 3,597,318 1,452,833 40% 1,437,247 15,586 1% Charges for Service
Shared Fire Command 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Paramedic Services 500,000 240,405 48% 228,211 12,194 5% All Other Charges 78,050 23,461 30% 17,796 5,666 32%
Subtotal Charges for Service 578,050 263,866 46% 246,006 17,860 7% General Fund Total
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Revenue Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Revenue Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Intergovernmental
POST and GEMT Reimbursements 34,000 6,378 19% 2,902 3,476 120% Subtotal Intergovernmental 34,000 6,378 19% 2,902 3,476 120% Fines & Fees
Parking Citations 32,000 5,002 16% (30) 5,032 -16773%
Vehicle Code Fines 92,200 21,785 24% 12,440 9,345 75%
Subtotal Fines & Fees 124,200 26,787 22% 12,410 14,377 116% Miscellaneous
Strike Team Reimbursements 100,000 11,384 11% 80,059 (68,675) -86% All Other Misc 500 575 115% 1,090 (515) -47%
Subtotal Miscellaneous 100,500 11,959 12% 81,149 (69,189) -85% 4,434,068 1,761,824 40% 1,779,714 (17,890) -1%
Fourth of July Fund (104) 61,715 15,875 26% 0 15,875 0% San Marino Center Fund (105) 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Donations Fund (281) 79,750 20,923 26% 18,533 2,389 13% GENERAL FUNDS GROUP TOTAL 31,371,177 11,849,606 38% 11,625,473 224,134 2%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (RESTRICTED)
Gas Tax Fund (202)
Interest Income 7,500 0 0% 4,056 (4,056) -100%
Section 2105 76,857 38,191 50% 35,279 2,911 8%
Section 2106 47,515 24,307 51% 22,496 1,811 8%
Section 2107 97,806 40,915 42% 48,712 (7,798) -16%
Section 2107.5 3,000 3,000 100% 3,000 0 0%
Section 2032 260,961 89,823 34% 100,170 (10,347) -10%
Traffic Congestion Relief - Prop 42 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Section 2103 117,950 60,095 51% 51,733 8,362 16%
611,589 256,330 42% 265,447 (9,117) -3%
Community Development Block Grant Fund (204) 0 10,985 0% 6,470 4,515 70% County Park Prop A Fund (206) 0 0 0% 7,657 (7,657) -100% Prop A Transit Fund (207) 268,285 107,911 40% 91,397 16,513 18% Drought Fund (209) 700 46 7% 132 (86) -65%
Air Quality Management District Fund (212) 19,500 4,086 21% 4,866 (780) -16% STPL Fund (213) 0 405 0% 1,152 (747) -65%
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Fund (214) 9,597 9,000 94% 0 9,000 1836669% Total Public Safety Fund
Total Gas Tax Fund

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Revenue Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Prop C Transit Fund (215) 223,718 89,830 40% 77,596 12,233 16% Public Education and Government (PEG) Fund (216) 33,400 7,597 23% 8,227 (630) -8% Asset Forfeiture (Police) (217) 500 76 15% 217 (141) -65% Granada Ave. Assessment Dist. #2 Fund (220) 0 0 0% 0 0 0% Used Oil Grant Fund (221) 0 25 0% 72 (47) -65%
OTS Grant Fund (223) 119,100 0 0% 0 0 0%
California Recycling Grant Fund (226) 1,000 290 29% 824 (535) -65% Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund (233) 164,300 134,897 82% 133,073 1,824 1% Homeland Security Grant (240) 51,789 0 0% 1,502 (1,502) -100% Measure R Transit Fund (243) 166,413 66,325 40% 55,483 10,842 20% Measure M Transit Fund (247) 187,335 75,510 40% 64,017 11,493 18% SPECIAL REVENUE RESTRICTED FUNDS TOTALS 1,857,226 763,314 41% 718,135 45,179 6%

PROPRIETARY FUNDS (INTERNAL SERVICES)
Capitalized Equipment Fund (591) 607,927 306,963 50% 225,264 81,700 36% INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTALS 607,927 306,963 50% 225,264 81,700 36%

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Interest Income 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Reimbursement 25,000 25,000 100% 0 25,000 0%
Huntington Library Donation 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
25,000 25,000 100% 0 25,000 0%

FIDUCIARY FUNDS
Agency Fund (609) 0 224 0% 943 (719) -76%
FIDUCIARY FUNDS TOTALS 0 224 0% 943 (719) -76%
ALL REVENUE GROUPS & FUNDS TOTAL 33,861,330 12,945,107 38% 12,569,815 375,293 3%

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (UNRESTRICTED)
General Fund (101)
City Council 28,165 13,416 48% 14,371 (955) -7%
City Attorney 273,200 227,659 83% 79,211 148,448 187%
Non-Departmental 1,402,972 816,332 58% 503,429 312,903 62% City Manager's Office 873,917 328,297 38% 368,545 (40,248) -11% Human Resources 466,476 194,107 42% 195,547 (1,440) -1% Finance Department 772,788 395,589 51% 416,158 (20,569) -5% Administration 3,817,518 1,975,401 1,577,261 398,140
Community Development Department 2,426,348 760,974 31% 805,418 (44,444) -6% Emergency Services 73,027 41,069 56% 12,756 28,313 222% Public Works, Streets, Parks Department
Administration 446,676 166,966 37% 185,362 (18,396) -10% Fleet 265,280 140,931 53% 139,136 1,795 1%
Sewers 342,800 77,220 23% 151,862 (74,642) -49%
Streets 832,138 326,284 39% 344,010 (17,726) -5%
Parks 580,368 258,536 45% 286,614 (28,078) -10%
Public Grounds 929,791 337,715 36% 485,704 (147,989) -30% Buildings 171,756 79,388 46% 125,340 (45,952) -37%
Subtotal Parks & PW 3,568,809 1,387,041 39% 1,718,029 (330,987) -19% Recreation Department
Administration 307,178 157,608 51% 185,969 (28,361) -15% Youth 364,186 135,383 37% 101,377 34,005 34%
Adult 150,092 62,447 42% 53,229 9,218 17%
Community Events & Enrichment 212,255 91,563 43% 60,680 30,883 51% Contract Classes 229,093 131,777 58% 23,862 107,915 452% Facilities & Rentals 145,443 59,131 41% 49,327 9,804 20% San Marino Center/Thurnher House 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Subtotal Recreation 1,408,247 637,909 45% 474,445 163,464 34% Library Department
Administration 663,331 302,027 46% 321,584 (19,557) -6% Adult Services 306,593 122,662 40% 108,386 14,276 13%
Children's Services 214,428 96,738 45% 88,252 8,486 10% Processing 114,486 29,343 26% 24,127 5,216 22%
Circulation 405,330 175,495 43% 118,951 56,544 48%
Subtotal Library 1,704,168 726,266 43% 661,301 64,965 10% El Molino Viejo 56,000 56,000 100% 56,000 0 0%
Total General Fund 13,054,117 5,584,660 43% 5,305,209 279,451 5% Public Safety Fund (103)
Police Department 7,621,933 3,844,713 50% 3,613,029 231,684 6% Fire Department 5,743,290 3,459,189 60% 3,266,837 192,352 6% Public Safety Fund 13,365,223 7,303,902 55% 6,879,866 424,036 6% Fourth of July Event Fund (104)
4th of July 104,553 80,124 77% 0 80,124 0%
4th of July Event Fund 104,553 80,124 77% 0 80,124 0%
San Marino Center Fund (105)
San Marino Center 0 201 100% 0 201 0%
SM Center Fund 0 201 100% 0 201 0%
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Donations to City Fund (281)
Police 5,250 0 0% 0 0 0%
Fire 0 0 0% 10,479 (10,479) -100%
Lacy Park 0 7,817 0% 50,000 (42,183) -84%
Special Events 500 0 0% 0 0 0%
Preschool 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Thurnher House 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Administration 2,000 0 0% 36,117 (36,117) -100% Library Adult Services 13,375 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Children's Services 31,625 3,866 12% 330 3,536 1073% Donations to City Fund 52,750 11,682 22% 96,925 (85,243) -88% Workers' Compensation Fund (595)
Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Human Resources 228,806 228,713 100% 169,837 58,876 35% Community Development 5,550 0 0% 0 0 0%
Police 122,100 64,012 52% 51,840 12,172 23%
Fire 203,500 78,682 39% 84,968 (6,286) -7%
PW Administration 22,200 1,655 7% 5,395 (3,740) -69%
Recreation Administration 5,500 293 5% 0 293 0%
Library Administration 5,550 0 0% 0 0 0%
Workers' Comp Fund 593,206 373,355 63% 312,040 61,315 20% General Liability Fund (596)
CJPIA Insurance Premiums 760,813 746,844 98% 777,752 (30,908) -4% General Liability Fund 760,813 746,844 98% 777,752 (30,908) -4% GENERAL FUND GROUP TOTAL 27,930,662 14,100,769 50% 13,371,794 728,975 5%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (RESTRICTED)
Gas Tax Fund (202)
Street Rehabilitation 1,765,467 1,375,000 78% 489,790 885,210 181% Gas Tax Fund 1,765,467 1,375,000 78% 489,790 885,210 181% Community Development Block Grant Fund (204)
Sidewalk Repair 0 0 0% - 0 0%
Senior Outreach 0 12,643 100% 6,470 6,174 95%
CDBG Fund 0 12,643 100% 6,470 6,174 95%
County Park Prop A Bond Fund (206)
Thurnher House 0 5,667 0% 147 5,520 3747%
Park Prop A Bonds 0 5,667 0% 147 5,520 3747%
Prop A Transportation Fund (207)
Administration/Finance 124,300 27,495 22% 0 27,495 0%
Adult 15,600 1,250 8% 0 1,250 0%
Youth 93,902 0 0% (795) 795 -100%
Prop A Transportation Fund 233,802 28,745 12% (795) 29,540 -3716% Drought Fund (209)
Contract Services 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Drought Fund 0 0 0% 0 0 0%

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Air Quality Fund (212)
Vehicle Replace-Comm Development & PD 97,400 0 0% 0 0 0% Air Quality Fund 97,400 0 0% 0 0 0%
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Fund (214)
City Wide Sidewalk 9,000 0 0% - 0 0%
TDA Fund 9,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Prop C Transit Fund (215)
Streets 5,000 300,000 6000% 0 300,000 0%
Prop C Fund 5,000 300,000 6000% 0 300,000 0%
Used Oil Grant (221)
Planning & Building 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Used Oil Fund 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
OTS Grant (223)
Police Contract Services 119,100 2,367 2% 0 2,367 0%
OTS Grant Fund 119,100 2,367 2% 0 2,367 0%
COPS Fund (233)
Police Contract Services 82,700 60,832 74% 20,393 40,439 198% COPS Fund 82,700 60,832 74% 20,393 40,439 198%
Homeland Security Grant Fund (240)
Capitalized Equipment 51,789 0 0% 0 0 0%
Measure R Fund 51,789 0 0% 0 0 0%
Measure R Fund (243)
Street Rehabilitation 485,000 150,000 31% 175,097 (25,097) -14% Measure R Fund 485,000 150,000 31% 175,097 (25,097) -14% Measure M Fund (247)
Street Rehabilitation 0 0 0% 264903 (264,903) -100%
Measure M Fund 0 0 0% 264,903 (264,903) -100%
SPECIAL REVENUE RESTRICTED FUNDS TOTALS 2,849,258 1,935,254 68% 956,005 979,250 102%

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Capital Projects Fund (394)
911 Dispatch Renovation 31,907 0 0% 0 0 0%
PD Utilization Study 125,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
PD Electrical Project 0 0 0% 25,997 (25,997) -100%
Fire Apparatus Doors 0 0 0% 56,050 (56,050) -100%
FS Bathroom Remodel 25,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Fire Station HVAC Upgrades 10,660 10,660 100% 0 10,660 0% Fire Station H&S Upgrades 6,236 5,963 96% 0 5,963 0%
EOC Improvements 18,300 0 0% 0 0 0%
Civic Center Environmental Assessment 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
San Marino Center Renovations 5,018,035 140,319 3% 64,371 75,949 118% Emergency Generator System 53,112 0 0% 6,888 (6,888) -100% Condition Assessment-All Buildings 28,335 0 0% 0 0 0%
City Hall Campus 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Stoneman School Fire Safety Project 10,665 0 0% 14,484 (14,484) -100% Sewer Projects
Condition Assessment-Stormwater System 0 0 0% 856 (856) -100%

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Drainage Wash Improvement Program 50,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Sewer/Storm Drain Replacement 74,135 0 0% 16,265 (16,265) -100% Sewer Master Plan 53,583 0 0% 0 0 0%
Catch Basin Replacement 30,000 0 0% 29,985 (29,985) -100% Culvert Replacement Program 269,606 0 0% 0 0 0%
Lift Station Replacements 295,348 18,040 6% 0 18,040 0% Rio Hondo Load Reduction Strategy 204,605 90,501 44% 0 90,501 0% Trash Capture Filters 25,000 0 0% 24,995 (24,995) -100% Street Projects
Street Rehab Program 4,360,000 476,332 11% 823,747 (347,415) -42% Pavement Condition Assessment 8,023 0 0% 0 0 0%
Street Tree Management Plan 50,000 1,098 2% 7,570 (6,472) -85% Sidewalk Repair - Various Streets 487,388 120 0% 247 (127) -51% City Wide Traffic Study 105,814 41,931 40% 3,700 38,231 1033% Traffic Control Device Program 70,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Huntington/Mission St. Beautification 1,000,000 0 0% 0 0 0% Neighborhood Traffic Calming 75,000 4,070 5% 0 4,070 0% Biennial Striping & Markings 45,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Streetlight Management Plan 60,000 44,179 74% 0 44,179 0% Lacy Park Projects
Restroom Upgrades 0 0 0% 335,640 (335,640) -100%
Lacy Park Master Plan 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Lacy Park Emergency Phones 13,666 0 0% 0 0 0%
Rose Arbor Renovation 0 0 0% 422 (422) -100%
Condition Assessment 50,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Bottle Water Station 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Entry Canopy 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Window Tinting 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Computer Room Renovations 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
El Molino Viejo Pedestrian Lights 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
El Molino Old Mill Restoration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Capital Projects Fund 12,654,418 833,213 7% 1,411,216 (578,003) -41% CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS TOTAL 12,654,418 833,213 7% 1,411,216 (578,003) -41%

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Debt Service Fund (401)
Interest Expense 81,712 81,712 100% 103,729 (22,017) -21% Principal Repayment 450,000 450,000 100% 410,000 40,000 10% Debt Service Fund 531,712 531,712 100% 513,729 17,983 4% DEBT SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 531,712 531,712 100% 513,729 17,983 4%

PROPRIETARY FUNDS (INTERNAL SERVICES)
Capitalized Equipment Fund (591)
Non-Departmental 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Human Resources 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Finance 57,945 12,384 21% 3,881 8,503 219%
Police 92,266 54,306 59% 173,902 (119,596) -69%
Fire 357,720 0 0% 36,587 (36,587) -100%
Emergency Services 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Public Works Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Fleet 0 0 0% 16,369 (16,369) -100%
Streets 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Lacy Park 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Public Grounds 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Recreation Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Library Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Capitalized Equipment Fund 507,931 66,690 13% 230,739 (164,049) -71% INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 507,931 66,690 13% 230,739 (164,049) -71% ALL EXPENDITURE GROUPS & FUNDS TOTAL 44,473,981 17,467,638 39% 16,483,482 984,155 6%

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
• Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The Mid-Year financial review provides an explanation of the City’s budget condition in the first six months of the current fiscal year compared to the FY 2021-22 Approved Budget and prior fiscal year’s year-to-date (YTD) actuals. Staff has updated the Five-Year Financial Forecast and Long-Term (29 Year) Financial Projections, per the Citywide Financial Policies. Additionally, staff reviewed the General Fund Balance reserves excess that can be moved, per City Council approval, and is recommending a few budget amendments based on current fiscal year activity.

DISCUSSION
FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Review
After six months of fiscal activity in the current fiscal year, overall, the City’s budget remains on track as revenues and expenditures came in as expected and there are no fiscal concerns to report. The City’s main revenue sources such as property tax, utility users’ taxes, sales taxes, and franchise taxes, which equate to 77% of the General Fund revenues, remain robust while expenditures are under control. However, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to have a fiscal impact on various revenue and expenditure levels, which the staff report will go into more detail below.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: Paul Chung, Finance Director
Mark Siegfried, Accounting Manager/Controller
DATE: February 9, 2022
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 MID-YEAR FINANCIAL REVIEW,

UPDATED FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST AND LONG-TERM

FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS, AND APPROVAL OF BUDGET

AMENDMENTS
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

Overall, staff believes the impact of the pandemic is mostly felt on charges for services and that fiscal impacts will recover as state and local restrictions from the pandemic loosen over time.

At this time, staff is requesting a few revenue and expenditure amendments to the City’s budget based on City staff determining outside funds which can be used to provide City services and offset previously budgeted General Fund or CIP Fund expenditures. These will be discussed below.

Furthermore, even with the challenging fiscal environment due to the pandemic, the City’s overall fiscal picture remains strong as staff anticipates by the end of the fiscal year, the City will have a one-time budget surplus, or net income, of approximately $3.8 million, as a result of excess revenues over expenditures. This surplus would create a reserve of 62.7% when compared to operating revenues, which exceeds the 40% reserve requirement per the City’s fiscal policy.

Operating Revenues
Total General Fund revenues collected are 37.5% of the annual budget. Those revenues are tracking lower than what is depicted in the budget primarily due to timing of receipt of property taxes, utility users’ taxes, and franchise taxes. Taxes, which are the City’s largest revenue base, saw a 2.6% increase compared to last year. However, Money & Property revenues continue to be impacted by the pandemic seeing year over year decreases due to market volatility as it relates to interest rates. With the Library resuming passport processing and Recreation being able to provide more services during the first half of the year compared to last year, Charges for Service revenues have rebounded since last year. With the Omicron variant causing some services to be halted in early 2022, certain revenues that have been impacted in the City over the past 2 years may not recover by the end of the fiscal year depending on closures based on state and local guidance. Table 1 below provides additional detail as to revenues collected through the first half of the year:

Table 1 – General Fund revenues by Revenue Source

REVENUE SOURCE
FY 2021-22
BUDGET
FY 2021-22
YTD Actual
to 12/30/21 %%
FY 2020-21
YTD Actual
to 12/30/20
$ Var YTD
vs. PY %%
Property Taxes $ 18,119,000 $ 7,558,307 41.7% 7,342,384 $ 215,923 2.9% Utility Users Taxes $ 1,756,000 $ 786,839 44.8% 787,565 $ (726) -0.1% Franchise Taxes $ 662,000 $ 150,682 22.8% 171,576 $ (20,894) -12.2% Sales Taxes $ 400,000 $ 131,673 32.9% 94,658 $ 37,015 39.1% Note 1 Business License Taxes $ 415,000 $ 193,065 46.5% 200,160 $ (7,095) -3.5% Miscellaneous $ 3,480,850 $ 241,170 6.9% 509,054 $ (267,884) -52.6% Note 2 Charges for Service $ 1,148,794 $ 541,766 47.2% 294,416 $ 247,350 84.0% Note 3 Licenses & Permits $ 814,000 $ 447,483 55.0% 427,412 $ 40,792 9.5% TOTAL $ 26,795,644 $ 10,050,985 37.5% 9,827,225 $ 244,481 2.5%

• Note 1: Sales Taxes are 39.1% higher than last year. The higher revenues are primarily due to the fiscal impact of the pandemic. Sales Taxes were impacted in the prior year due to the ‘Stay At Home’ mandates implemented by the County, limiting community access to the local businesses.
• Note 2: Miscellaneous revenues are down as the City received $182k in the prior year due to CARES Act funding. Staff expects the full budgeted amount to be received by yearend once the City recognizes revenue from the American Rescue Plan funding that has been awarded to the City.
• Note 3: Charges for Service was $247k or 84.0% higher than last year. The primary cause of this is due to facility closures in the prior year. Community Development Department charges increased $80k due to an increase in plan check fees. Recreation Department charges increased by $85k due to contract classes, before and after school care, and the preschool all being closed in March 2020 while they were open this year. The Library Department saw an increase of $83k related to passports being able to be processed and an increase in passport demand due to less travel restrictions. Table 2 below provides the breakdown of Charges for Service revenues:

Table 2 – Charges for Service Detail

Table 3 below lists major Public Safety Fund revenues and the performance of each source through the first half of the fiscal year:

Table 3 – Public Safety Fund revenues by Revenue Source Charges for Service
FY 2021-22
BUDGET
FY 2021-22
YTD Actual
to 12/30/21 %%
FY 2020-21
YTD Actual
to 12/30/20
$ Var YTD
vs. PY %%
Administration $ 250 $ 343 137.0% $ 319 24 7.4%
Community Develop. $ 335,400 $ 231,833 69.1% 152,288 $ 79,545 52.2% Park & Public Works $ 132,000 $ 55,303 41.9% 55,338 $ (35) -0.1% Recreation $ 498,044 $ 147,413 29.6% 62,582 $ 84,831 135.6% Library $ 183,100 $ 106,875 58.4% 23,891 $ 82,984 347.4% TOTAL $ 1,148,794 $ 541,766 47.2% 294,416 $ $ 247,350 84.0%

REVENUE SOURCE
FY 2021-22
BUDGET
FY 2021-22
YTD Actual
to 12/30/21 %%
FY 2020-21
YTD Actual
to 12/30/20
$ Var YTD
vs. PY %%
Property Taxes $ 3,422,818 $ 1,388,509 40.6% 1,381,406 $ 7,103 0.5% Charges for Service $ 578,050 $ 263,866 45.6% 246,006 $ 17,860 7.3% Augmentation Fund $ 174,500 $ 64,324 36.9% 55,841 $ 8,483 15.2% Miscellaneous $ 134,500 $ 18,337 13.6% 84,051 $ (65,713) -78.2% Note 1 Fines & Fees $ 124,200 $ 26,787 21.6% 12,410 $ 14,377 115.9% TOTAL $ 4,434,068 $ 1,761,824 39.7% 1,779,714 $ (17,890) -1.0%

• Note 1: Miscellaneous revenues for the Public Safety Fund is due to the fact that the City billed the City of Monrovia for Strike Team Reimbursements for the Bobcat Fire in the prior year. Strike Team revenues are offset by corresponding staff expenditures. The Fire Department has only received one reimbursement in the current year related to the Beckwourth Fire.

Operating Expenditures
Total General Fund expenditures spent are 42.8% of the annual estimate. Table 4 lists the following major General Fund expenditures and the performance of each source through the first half of the fiscal year:

Table 4 – General Fund Expenditures by Department
• Note 1: The increase in City Attorney expenditures is due to $122k of expenditures related to vaccine mandates.
• Note 2: The decrease in City Manager’s Office expenditures is due to salary savings as well as a reduction of Other Contract Services of $12k compared to last year. • Note 3: The increase in Non-Departmental expenditures is due to the equipment allocation being moved from individual departments into Non-Departmental in the current year. This is a change of $304k.
• Note 4: The increase in Emergency Services expenditures is due to personnel costs related to the EOC.
• Note 5: The decrease in Public Works, Streets & Parks Department expenditures is due to timing of Other Contract Services for the Sewers and Public Grounds Divisions. The

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
FY 2020-21
Budget
FY 2020-21
YTD Actual to
12/30/20 %%
FY 2019-20
YTD Actual
to 12/30/19
$ Var YTD vs.

PY %%
City Council $ 28,165 $ 13,416 47.6% 14, $ 371 ($955) -6.6% City Attorney $ 273,200 $ 227,659 83.3% 79,211 $ $148,448 187.4% Note 1 City Manager's Office $ 873,917 $ 328,297 37.6% 368,545 $ ($40,248) -10.9% Note 2 Finance Department $ 772,788 $ 395,589 51.2% 416,158 $ ($20,569) -4.9% Human Resources (HR) $ 466,476 $ 194,107 41.6% 195,547 $ ($1,440) -0.7% Library Department $ 1,704,168 $ 726,266 42.6% 661,301 $ $64,965 9.8% Non-Department $ 1,402,972 $ 816,332 58.2% 503,429 $ $312,903 62.2% Note 3 Recreation Department $ 1,408,247 $ 637,909 45.3% 474,445 $ $163,464 34.5% Community Development Department $ 2,426,348 $ 760,974 31.4% 805,418 $ ($44,444) -5.5% Emergency Services $ 73,027 $ 41,069 56.2% 12,756 $ $28,313 222.0% Note 4 Public Works, Streets, Parks Department $ 3,568,809 $ 1,387,041 38.9% 1,718,029 $ ($330,988) -19.3% Note 5 El Molino Viejo $ 56,000 $ 56,000 100.0% 56,000 $ $0 100.0% TOTAL $ 13,054,117 $ 5,584,659 42.8% 5,305,210 $ $279,449 5.3%

Department also incurred costs last year related to the fumigation of the City Hall campus buildings.

Table 5 lists the major Public Safety Fund expenditures spent and the following is a list of Public Safety Fund expenditures by department and the performance of each source through the first half of the fiscal year:

Table 5 – Public Safety Fund Expenditures by Department • Note 1: Increase in Total Expenses for the Public Safety Fund is due to two reasons.

First, salaries and salary related expenses have increased due to the new Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs) which took effect July 1, 2019. Second, the City’s calculated total Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) related to pensions for sworn personnel increased $290k when compared to last year.

Attachments 1 and II of the staff report provides the summary of all revenues and expenditures by funds.

FY 2021-22 Year-End Projections
The FY 2021-22 Year-End Projections (Attachment III) anticipates a one-time budget surplus, or net income, of approximately $3.8 million by the end of the fiscal year. Revenues are projected to end the year $281k or 0.9% lower than budgeted due to the one-time impacts from the pandemic closures. However, the lower revenues are offset by the overall lower expenditures as year-end projected expenditures are $1.7 million or 5.9% lower than the current budget and the majority of the expenditure savings are due to the facility closures in the Community Services Department.

As stated above, staff believes the impact of the pandemic is mostly felt on charges for service and that fiscal impacts will recover as the restrictions from the pandemic loosen over time.

Updated Five-Year Financial Forecast and Long-Range Financial Projections The Five-Year Financial Forecast (Attachment IV), is the fiscal projection for the next five fiscal years. The assumed projected growth rate took various data points from prior year actuals,

EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
FY 2020-21
Budget
FY 2020-21
YTD Actual to
12/30/20 %%
FY 2019-20
YTD Actual
to 12/30/19
$ Var YTD vs.

PY %%
Fire Department $ 5,743,290 $ 3,459,189 60.2% 3,266,837 $ $ 192,352 5.9% Police Department $ 7,621,933 $ 3,844,713 50.4% 3,613,029 $ $ 231,684 6.4% TOTAL $ 13,365,223 $ 7,303,902 54.6% 6,879,866 $ $ 424,036 6.2% Note 1

three-year average, and a six-year average to prudently project a rate that provided reasonable growth patterns. The forecast projects revenues to exceed expenditures ranging from $1.4 million to $1.7 million through the first three years of the forecast. In FY 2025-26, the forecast excludes the Public Safety Parcel Tax, as the voters approved to continue the tax from FY 2020- 21 to FY 2024-25. Additionally, the operating reserve is expected to grow to $18.1 million by the end of the five-year period compared to the projected reserve of $16.1 million at the end of FY 2021-22.

The Long-Term Financial Projections (Attachment V) provides the City Council a 29-year forecast from FY 2022-23 to FY 2050-51. Per Section 5 of the Citywide Financial Policies Compliance, it states the City shall publish a long-range projection for General Fund activities and operations. It is difficult to accurately project out long range as various external economic forces can affect the outcome of the forecast such as an economic downturn, natural disasters, future legislation, and pandemics. Staff has taken a prudent approach and used the same projected growth rate used in the five-year financial forecast for the Long-Range Financial Projections.

General Fund Balance Reserves (Unassigned Fund Balance) Transfer Per Section 1. A. of the Citywide Financial Policies Compliance, it states that the City shall maintain General Fund Reserves (Unassigned Fund Balance) at approximately 40% of General Fund revenues. Additionally, Section 1. D. states periodic transfers from accumulated General Fund Reserves shall be transferred to the Capital Projects Fund and the Capital Equipment Fund when appropriate. At the end of FY 2020-21, the General Fund’s audited unassigned Fund Balance Reserve was $15,649,107 with operating revenues of $29,643,955 or 53% cash reserves.

At the February 25, 2022 City Council meeting, staff will recommend that the City Council approve moving the excess cash from the General Fund Reserves to the Capital Projects Fund while still also meeting the 40% reserve requirement per the City’s fiscal policy.

Staff will provide an update to the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Forecast during the CIP budget presentation.

Budget Amendments
As noted above, staff is recommending a few revenue and expenditure amendments to the City’s budget based on City staff determining outside funds which can be used to provide City services and offset previously budgeted General Fund or CIP Fund expenditures.

Budget Amendment 1
Budget Amendment 1 is to appropriate funds for legal services related to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The funds will be coming from General Fund Reserves.

Budget Amendment 2
Budget Amendment 2 is to utilize funds provided by our CDBG contract to continue to provide Senior Services during the pandemic like grocery delivery, iPad training classes, as well as socially distanced Senior Events like the Luau at Lacy Park. This has no impact to the General Fund.

Budget Amendment 3
Budget Amendment 3 is to utilize funds provided by Measure A Funds provided by the LA County Regional Park and Open District to continue to provide maintenance and service at the Thurnher House. This has no impact to the General Fund.

Budget Amendment 4
Budget Amendment 4 is to utilize Metro Prop C Funds for the Street Rehabilitation Project instead of using CIP Funds. The project has already been approved by Metro.

Budget Amendment 5
Budget Amendment 5 is to provide budgeted expenditures related to Year 4 of the 5-year lease commitment that was not previously budgeted. The budget line item was an oversight during the annual budget process and should have been included. The funds will be coming from Capital Equipment Fund Reserves.

Account Name Account Number Type of Appropriation Budget Amendment Amount Contract Legal Services-COVID-19 101-06-4106-2757 Expenditure 175,000.00 Account Name Account Number Type of Appropriation Budget Amendment Amount Federal CDBG 204-00-3201-0650 Revenue 18,451.00
Other Contract Services 204-08-4150-0000 Expenditure 8,451.00 Non-Capitalized Equipment 204-08-4399-0000 Expenditure 10,000.00 Account Name Account Number Type of Appropriation Budget Amendment Amount Local LA County Park Bond Fund 206-00-3203-3420 Revenue 12,700.00 Part-Time Wages 206-84-4002-0000 Expenditure 11,500.00
Medicare 206-84-4006-0000 Expenditure 200.00
Retirement-PERS 206-84-4008-6160 Expenditure 1,000.00
Account Name Account Number Type of Appropriation Budget Amendment Amount Street Rehabilitation 215-48-4600-9271 Expenditure 300,000.00 Street Rehabilitation 394-48-4600-9271 Expenditure (300,000.00) Account Name Account Number Type of Appropriation Budget Amendment Amount Taser Devices 591-30-4613-0555 Expenditure $ 7,350.00

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The above proposed budget amendments have a Net Expense of $182,350, $175,000 from General Fund Reserves and $7,350 from Capital Equipment Fund Reserves.

This report requires no procurement review.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that this report be received and filed, and that the Council authorizes the budget amendments noted above. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendations, the appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Review, Updated Five-Year Financial Forecast, and Long-Term Financial Projections, and approve the budget amendments as noted in the Staff Report.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Revenue Summary Report at December 31, 2021

2. Expenditure Summary Report at December 31, 2021

3. FY 2021-22 Year-End Projections

4. Updated Five-Year Financial Forecast

5. Long-Term Financial Projections

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (UNRESTRICTED)
General Fund (101)
Taxes
Property Taxes 17,939,000 7,437,199 41% 7,271,101 166,097 2% Sales Taxes 400,000 131,673 33% 94,658 37,015 39%
Franchise Taxes 662,000 150,682 23% 171,576 (20,894) -12% Property Transfer Taxes 180,000 121,108 67% 71,282 49,825 70% Utility Users Taxes 1,756,000 786,839 45% 787,565 (726) 0% Business License Taxes 415,000 193,065 47% 200,160 (7,095) -4% Subtotal Taxes 21,352,000 8,820,565 41% 8,596,342 224,222 3% Licenses & Permits
Street & Curb Permits 250,000 79,062 32% 105,033 (25,972) -25% Building Permits 511,000 327,952 64% 302,372 25,579 8%
Tree Permits 40,000 24,830 62% 15,120 9,710 64%
Bicycle Licenses 0 0 100% 4 (4) -100%
Film Permits 13,000 15,640 120% 4,883 10,757 220%
Subtotal Licenses & Permits 814,000 447,483 55% 427,412 20,071 5% Charges for Service
Administration 250 343 137% 319 25 8%
Planning & Building Department 335,400 231,833 69% 152,288 79,545 52% Public Works, Streets, Parks Department 132,000 55,303 42% 55,338 (35) 0% Recreation Department 498,044 147,413 30% 62,582 84,831 136% Library Department 183,100 106,875 58% 23,891 82,984 347% Subtotal Charges for Service 1,148,794 541,766 47% 294,416 247,350 84% Intergovernmental
VLF 10,200 0 0% 0 0 0%
VLF Swap (Motor Vehicle In-Lieu) 1,889,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
COVID-19 Reimbursements 1,200,000 10,000 1% 181,875 (171,875) -95% Cenic Rebates 14,100 14,594 104% 14,141 453 3%
Subtotal Intergovernmental 3,113,300 24,594 1% 196,016 (171,422) -87% Fines & Forfeitures
Fines & Fees 100 949 949% 50 899 1799%
Tree Fines 15,000 (27,365) -182% 118,420 (145,785) -123% Business License NOVs 6,500 5,675 87% 12,240 (6,565) -54% Subtotal Fines & Forfeitures 21,600 (20,741) -96% 130,710 (151,451) -116% Money & Property
Rentals - PW 500 2,160 432% 0 2,160 0%
Rents & Concessions - Park 125,000 81,064 65% 58,798 22,266 38% Rents & Concessions - Recreation 4,850 750 15% 1,392 (642) -46% Library Rentals 0 785 0% 0 785 0%
Interest Income 180,000 65,183 36% 98,918 (33,735) -34% Subtotal Money & Property 310,350 149,942 48% 159,108 (9,166) -6% Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous 15,000 6,480 43% 5,627 853 15%
Damage to City Property 10,000 8,998 90% 11,272 (2,274) -20% Sale of Property 6,500 138 2% 6,320 (6,182) -98%
City Reimbursements 100 71,364 71364% 0 71,364 0%
Old Mill Reimbursements 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Miscellaneous - Library 4,000 395 10% 1 394 39389%
Subtotal Miscellaneous 35,600 87,375 245% 23,220 64,155 276% 26,795,644 10,050,985 38% 9,827,225 223,759 2%
Public Safety Fund (103)
Taxes
Property Taxes 3,422,818 1,388,509 41% 1,381,406 7,103 1% Augmentation Fund 174,500 64,324 37% 55,841 8,483 15%
Subtotal Taxes 3,597,318 1,452,833 40% 1,437,247 15,586 1% Charges for Service
Shared Fire Command 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Paramedic Services 500,000 240,405 48% 228,211 12,194 5% All Other Charges 78,050 23,461 30% 17,796 5,666 32%
Subtotal Charges for Service 578,050 263,866 46% 246,006 17,860 7% General Fund Total
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Revenue Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
ATTACHMENT I Page 945 of 1126
FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Revenue Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Intergovernmental
POST and GEMT Reimbursements 34,000 6,378 19% 2,902 3,476 120% Subtotal Intergovernmental 34,000 6,378 19% 2,902 3,476 120% Fines & Fees
Parking Citations 32,000 5,002 16% (30) 5,032 -16773%
Vehicle Code Fines 92,200 21,785 24% 12,440 9,345 75%
Subtotal Fines & Fees 124,200 26,787 22% 12,410 14,377 116% Miscellaneous
Strike Team Reimbursements 100,000 11,384 11% 80,059 (68,675) -86% All Other Misc 500 575 115% 1,090 (515) -47%
Subtotal Miscellaneous 100,500 11,959 12% 81,149 (69,189) -85% 4,434,068 1,761,824 40% 1,779,714 (17,890) -1%
Fourth of July Fund (104) 61,715 15,875 26% 0 15,875 0% San Marino Center Fund (105) 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Donations Fund (281) 79,750 20,923 26% 18,533 2,389 13% GENERAL FUNDS GROUP TOTAL 31,371,177 11,849,606 38% 11,625,473 224,134 2%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (RESTRICTED)
Gas Tax Fund (202)
Interest Income 7,500 0 0% 4,056 (4,056) -100%
Section 2105 76,857 38,191 50% 35,279 2,911 8%
Section 2106 47,515 24,307 51% 22,496 1,811 8%
Section 2107 97,806 40,915 42% 48,712 (7,798) -16%
Section 2107.5 3,000 3,000 100% 3,000 0 0%
Section 2032 260,961 89,823 34% 100,170 (10,347) -10%
Traffic Congestion Relief - Prop 42 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Section 2103 117,950 60,095 51% 51,733 8,362 16%
611,589 256,330 42% 265,447 (9,117) -3%
Community Development Block Grant Fund (204) 0 10,985 0% 6,470 4,515 70% County Park Prop A Fund (206) 0 0 0% 7,657 (7,657) -100% Prop A Transit Fund (207) 268,285 107,911 40% 91,397 16,513 18% Drought Fund (209) 700 46 7% 132 (86) -65%
Air Quality Management District Fund (212) 19,500 4,086 21% 4,866 (780) -16% STPL Fund (213) 0 405 0% 1,152 (747) -65%
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Fund (214) 9,597 9,000 94% 0 9,000 1836669% Total Public Safety Fund
Total Gas Tax Fund
ATTACHMENT I Page 946 of 1126
FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Revenue Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Prop C Transit Fund (215) 223,718 89,830 40% 77,596 12,233 16% Public Education and Government (PEG) Fund (216) 33,400 7,597 23% 8,227 (630) -8% Asset Forfeiture (Police) (217) 500 76 15% 217 (141) -65% Granada Ave. Assessment Dist. #2 Fund (220) 0 0 0% 0 0 0% Used Oil Grant Fund (221) 0 25 0% 72 (47) -65%
OTS Grant Fund (223) 119,100 0 0% 0 0 0%
California Recycling Grant Fund (226) 1,000 290 29% 824 (535) -65% Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund (233) 164,300 134,897 82% 133,073 1,824 1% Homeland Security Grant (240) 51,789 0 0% 1,502 (1,502) -100% Measure R Transit Fund (243) 166,413 66,325 40% 55,483 10,842 20% Measure M Transit Fund (247) 187,335 75,510 40% 64,017 11,493 18% SPECIAL REVENUE RESTRICTED FUNDS TOTALS 1,857,226 763,314 41% 718,135 45,179 6%

PROPRIETARY FUNDS (INTERNAL SERVICES)
Capitalized Equipment Fund (591) 607,927 306,963 50% 225,264 81,700 36% INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTALS 607,927 306,963 50% 225,264 81,700 36%

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Interest Income 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Reimbursement 25,000 25,000 100% 0 25,000 0%
Huntington Library Donation 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
25,000 25,000 100% 0 25,000 0%

FIDUCIARY FUNDS
Agency Fund (609) 0 224 0% 943 (719) -76%
FIDUCIARY FUNDS TOTALS 0 224 0% 943 (719) -76%
ALL REVENUE GROUPS & FUNDS TOTAL 33,861,330 12,945,107 38% 12,569,815 375,293 3% ATTACHMENT I Page 947 of 1126

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (UNRESTRICTED)
General Fund (101)
City Council 28,165 13,416 48% 14,371 (955) -7%
City Attorney 273,200 227,659 83% 79,211 148,448 187%
Non-Departmental 1,402,972 816,332 58% 503,429 312,903 62% City Manager's Office 873,917 328,297 38% 368,545 (40,248) -11% Human Resources 466,476 194,107 42% 195,547 (1,440) -1% Finance Department 772,788 395,589 51% 416,158 (20,569) -5% Administration 3,817,518 1,975,401 1,577,261 398,140
Community Development Department 2,426,348 760,974 31% 805,418 (44,444) -6% Emergency Services 73,027 41,069 56% 12,756 28,313 222% Public Works, Streets, Parks Department
Administration 446,676 166,966 37% 185,362 (18,396) -10% Fleet 265,280 140,931 53% 139,136 1,795 1%
Sewers 342,800 77,220 23% 151,862 (74,642) -49%
Streets 832,138 326,284 39% 344,010 (17,726) -5%
Parks 580,368 258,536 45% 286,614 (28,078) -10%
Public Grounds 929,791 337,715 36% 485,704 (147,989) -30% Buildings 171,756 79,388 46% 125,340 (45,952) -37%
Subtotal Parks & PW 3,568,809 1,387,041 39% 1,718,029 (330,987) -19% Recreation Department
Administration 307,178 157,608 51% 185,969 (28,361) -15% Youth 364,186 135,383 37% 101,377 34,005 34%
Adult 150,092 62,447 42% 53,229 9,218 17%
Community Events & Enrichment 212,255 91,563 43% 60,680 30,883 51% Contract Classes 229,093 131,777 58% 23,862 107,915 452% Facilities & Rentals 145,443 59,131 41% 49,327 9,804 20% San Marino Center/Thurnher House 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Subtotal Recreation 1,408,247 637,909 45% 474,445 163,464 34% Library Department
Administration 663,331 302,027 46% 321,584 (19,557) -6% Adult Services 306,593 122,662 40% 108,386 14,276 13%
Children's Services 214,428 96,738 45% 88,252 8,486 10% Processing 114,486 29,343 26% 24,127 5,216 22%
Circulation 405,330 175,495 43% 118,951 56,544 48%
Subtotal Library 1,704,168 726,266 43% 661,301 64,965 10% El Molino Viejo 56,000 56,000 100% 56,000 0 0%
Total General Fund 13,054,117 5,584,660 43% 5,305,209 279,451 5% Public Safety Fund (103)
Police Department 7,621,933 3,844,713 50% 3,613,029 231,684 6% Fire Department 5,743,290 3,459,189 60% 3,266,837 192,352 6% Public Safety Fund 13,365,223 7,303,902 55% 6,879,866 424,036 6% Fourth of July Event Fund (104)
4th of July 104,553 80,124 77% 0 80,124 0%
4th of July Event Fund 104,553 80,124 77% 0 80,124 0%
San Marino Center Fund (105)
San Marino Center 0 201 100% 0 201 0%
SM Center Fund 0 201 100% 0 201 0%
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
ATTACHMENT II Page 949 of 1126
FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Donations to City Fund (281)
Police 5,250 0 0% 0 0 0%
Fire 0 0 0% 10,479 (10,479) -100%
Lacy Park 0 7,817 0% 50,000 (42,183) -84%
Special Events 500 0 0% 0 0 0%
Preschool 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Thurnher House 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Administration 2,000 0 0% 36,117 (36,117) -100% Library Adult Services 13,375 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Children's Services 31,625 3,866 12% 330 3,536 1073% Donations to City Fund 52,750 11,682 22% 96,925 (85,243) -88% Workers' Compensation Fund (595)
Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Human Resources 228,806 228,713 100% 169,837 58,876 35% Community Development 5,550 0 0% 0 0 0%
Police 122,100 64,012 52% 51,840 12,172 23%
Fire 203,500 78,682 39% 84,968 (6,286) -7%
PW Administration 22,200 1,655 7% 5,395 (3,740) -69%
Recreation Administration 5,500 293 5% 0 293 0%
Library Administration 5,550 0 0% 0 0 0%
Workers' Comp Fund 593,206 373,355 63% 312,040 61,315 20% General Liability Fund (596)
CJPIA Insurance Premiums 760,813 746,844 98% 777,752 (30,908) -4% General Liability Fund 760,813 746,844 98% 777,752 (30,908) -4% GENERAL FUND GROUP TOTAL 27,930,662 14,100,769 50% 13,371,794 728,975 5%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (RESTRICTED)
Gas Tax Fund (202)
Street Rehabilitation 1,765,467 1,375,000 78% 489,790 885,210 181% Gas Tax Fund 1,765,467 1,375,000 78% 489,790 885,210 181% Community Development Block Grant Fund (204)
Sidewalk Repair 0 0 0% - 0 0%
Senior Outreach 0 12,643 100% 6,470 6,174 95%
CDBG Fund 0 12,643 100% 6,470 6,174 95%
County Park Prop A Bond Fund (206)
Thurnher House 0 5,667 0% 147 5,520 3747%
Park Prop A Bonds 0 5,667 0% 147 5,520 3747%
Prop A Transportation Fund (207)
Administration/Finance 124,300 27,495 22% 0 27,495 0%
Adult 15,600 1,250 8% 0 1,250 0%
Youth 93,902 0 0% (795) 795 -100%
Prop A Transportation Fund 233,802 28,745 12% (795) 29,540 -3716% Drought Fund (209)
Contract Services 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Drought Fund 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
ATTACHMENT II Page 950 of 1126
FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Air Quality Fund (212)
Vehicle Replace-Comm Development & PD 97,400 0 0% 0 0 0% Air Quality Fund 97,400 0 0% 0 0 0%
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Fund (214)
City Wide Sidewalk 9,000 0 0% - 0 0%
TDA Fund 9,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Prop C Transit Fund (215)
Streets 5,000 300,000 6000% 0 300,000 0%
Prop C Fund 5,000 300,000 6000% 0 300,000 0%
Used Oil Grant (221)
Planning & Building 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Used Oil Fund 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
OTS Grant (223)
Police Contract Services 119,100 2,367 2% 0 2,367 0%
OTS Grant Fund 119,100 2,367 2% 0 2,367 0%
COPS Fund (233)
Police Contract Services 82,700 60,832 74% 20,393 40,439 198% COPS Fund 82,700 60,832 74% 20,393 40,439 198%
Homeland Security Grant Fund (240)
Capitalized Equipment 51,789 0 0% 0 0 0%
Measure R Fund 51,789 0 0% 0 0 0%
Measure R Fund (243)
Street Rehabilitation 485,000 150,000 31% 175,097 (25,097) -14% Measure R Fund 485,000 150,000 31% 175,097 (25,097) -14% Measure M Fund (247)
Street Rehabilitation 0 0 0% 264903 (264,903) -100%
Measure M Fund 0 0 0% 264,903 (264,903) -100%
SPECIAL REVENUE RESTRICTED FUNDS TOTALS 2,849,258 1,935,254 68% 956,005 979,250 102%

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Capital Projects Fund (394)
911 Dispatch Renovation 31,907 0 0% 0 0 0%
PD Utilization Study 125,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
PD Electrical Project 0 0 0% 25,997 (25,997) -100%
Fire Apparatus Doors 0 0 0% 56,050 (56,050) -100%
FS Bathroom Remodel 25,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Fire Station HVAC Upgrades 10,660 10,660 100% 0 10,660 0% Fire Station H&S Upgrades 6,236 5,963 96% 0 5,963 0%
EOC Improvements 18,300 0 0% 0 0 0%
Civic Center Environmental Assessment 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
San Marino Center Renovations 5,018,035 140,319 3% 64,371 75,949 118% Emergency Generator System 53,112 0 0% 6,888 (6,888) -100% Condition Assessment-All Buildings 28,335 0 0% 0 0 0%
City Hall Campus 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Stoneman School Fire Safety Project 10,665 0 0% 14,484 (14,484) -100% Sewer Projects
Condition Assessment-Stormwater System 0 0 0% 856 (856) -100% ATTACHMENT II Page 951 of 1126
FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Drainage Wash Improvement Program 50,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Sewer/Storm Drain Replacement 74,135 0 0% 16,265 (16,265) -100% Sewer Master Plan 53,583 0 0% 0 0 0%
Catch Basin Replacement 30,000 0 0% 29,985 (29,985) -100% Culvert Replacement Program 269,606 0 0% 0 0 0%
Lift Station Replacements 295,348 18,040 6% 0 18,040 0% Rio Hondo Load Reduction Strategy 204,605 90,501 44% 0 90,501 0% Trash Capture Filters 25,000 0 0% 24,995 (24,995) -100% Street Projects
Street Rehab Program 4,360,000 476,332 11% 823,747 (347,415) -42% Pavement Condition Assessment 8,023 0 0% 0 0 0%
Street Tree Management Plan 50,000 1,098 2% 7,570 (6,472) -85% Sidewalk Repair - Various Streets 487,388 120 0% 247 (127) -51% City Wide Traffic Study 105,814 41,931 40% 3,700 38,231 1033% Traffic Control Device Program 70,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Huntington/Mission St. Beautification 1,000,000 0 0% 0 0 0% Neighborhood Traffic Calming 75,000 4,070 5% 0 4,070 0% Biennial Striping & Markings 45,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Streetlight Management Plan 60,000 44,179 74% 0 44,179 0% Lacy Park Projects
Restroom Upgrades 0 0 0% 335,640 (335,640) -100%
Lacy Park Master Plan 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Lacy Park Emergency Phones 13,666 0 0% 0 0 0%
Rose Arbor Renovation 0 0 0% 422 (422) -100%
Condition Assessment 50,000 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Bottle Water Station 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Entry Canopy 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Window Tinting 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Library Computer Room Renovations 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
El Molino Viejo Pedestrian Lights 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
El Molino Old Mill Restoration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Capital Projects Fund 12,654,418 833,213 7% 1,411,216 (578,003) -41% CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS TOTAL 12,654,418 833,213 7% 1,411,216 (578,003) -41%

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Debt Service Fund (401)
Interest Expense 81,712 81,712 100% 103,729 (22,017) -21% Principal Repayment 450,000 450,000 100% 410,000 40,000 10% Debt Service Fund 531,712 531,712 100% 513,729 17,983 4% DEBT SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 531,712 531,712 100% 513,729 17,983 4%

PROPRIETARY FUNDS (INTERNAL SERVICES)
Capitalized Equipment Fund (591)
Non-Departmental 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Human Resources 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Finance 57,945 12,384 21% 3,881 8,503 219%
Police 92,266 54,306 59% 173,902 (119,596) -69%
Fire 357,720 0 0% 36,587 (36,587) -100%
Emergency Services 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Public Works Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Fleet 0 0 0% 16,369 (16,369) -100%
Streets 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Lacy Park 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Public Grounds 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Recreation Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
ATTACHMENT II Page 952 of 1126
FY 20-21
Budget @ 12.31.21 % @ 12.31.20 $ %
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Expenditure Summary Report
For Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 -- 50% of Fiscal Year Complete Fiscal Year 2021-22 Current Year v. Prior Year
Library Administration 0 0 0% 0 0 0%
Capitalized Equipment Fund 507,931 66,690 13% 230,739 (164,049) -71% INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 507,931 66,690 13% 230,739 (164,049) -71% ALL EXPENDITURE GROUPS & FUNDS TOTAL 44,473,981 17,467,638 39% 16,483,482 984,155 6% ATTACHMENT II Page 953 of 1126

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

ATTCHMENT III
Revised Budget
FY 2021-22
Projected YE
FY 2021-22
Budget to
Actual
Variance
Budget to
Actual %
Change

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Property Tax $ 17,939,000 $ 17,939,000 $ - 0.0%
Public Safety Property Tax 3,597,318 3,600,000 2,682 0.1% Sales Tax 400,000 395,019 (4,981) -1.3%
Utility User Tax 1,756,000 1,888,414 132,414 7.5%
Charges for Services 1,726,844 1,450,000 (276,844) -16.0% Licenses & Permits 814,000 894,966 80,966 10.0%
Other Revenues 5,138,015 4,922,300 (215,715) -4.2%
Total Revenues $ 31,371,177 $ 31,089,699 $ (281,478) -0.9%

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Salaries - Miscellaneous $ 4,995,999 $ 4,568,736 $ (427,263) -8.6% Salaries - Safety 6,608,861 6,300,000 (308,861) -4.7%
Overtime - Miscellaneous 23,054 23,054 0 0.0%
Overtime - Safety 959,256 1,249,035 289,779 30.2%
Medical, Medicare, Allowances 2,154,041 1,687,241 (466,800) -21.7% Pension Payments - Miscellaneous 1,107,837 1,107,837 0 0.0% Pension Payments - Public Safety 3,239,201 3,239,201 0 0.0% Debt Service - Pension Bonds 531,712 531,712 0 0.0%
Retirees' Medical (OPEB) 200,000 213,516 13,516 6.8%
Total Personnel $ 19,819,961 $ 18,920,333 $ (899,628) -4.5% Non-Personnel
Workers' Compensation $ 569,446 $ 800,000 $ 230,554 40.5% General Liability & Insurance 764,824 753,344 (11,480) -1.5% Legal Services 448,200 505,000 56,800 12.7%
Supplies, R&M, Misc Other 1,154,527 793,449 (361,078) -31.3% Contract Services 4,059,615 3,359,615 (700,000) -17.2%
Utilities 693,067 625,979 (67,088) -9.7%
Capital Equipment 507,931 507,931 0 0.0%
Other 952,734 984,329 31,595 3.3%
OPEB Trust Contribution - - 0 0.0%
Pension Trust Contribution - - 0 0.0%
Annual Reserve Contribution - - - 0.0%
Total Non-Personnel $ 9,150,344 $ 8,329,647 $ (820,697) -9.0% Total Expenditures $ 28,970,305 $ 27,249,980 $ (1,720,325) -5.9% Annual Operating Surplus (Deficit) $ 2,400,872 $ 3,839,719 $ 1,438,847 59.9% FY 2021-22 Year-End Projections

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

ATTACHMENT IV
Revised
Budget FY
2021-22
Projected YE
FY 2021-22
Projected
YE vs
Budget
Assumed
Projected
Growth Rate
Projected FY
2022-23
Projected FY
2023-24
Projected FY
2024-25
Projected FY
2025-26
Projected FY
2026-27

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Property Tax $ 17,939,000 $ 17,939,000 3.5% $ 18,566,865 $ 19,216,705 $ 19,889,290 $ 20,585,415 $ 21,305,905 Public Safety Property Tax 3,597,318 3,600,000 2.0% 3,672,000 3,745,440 3,820,349 - - Sales Tax 400,000 395,019 3.5% 408,845 423,155 437,965 453,294 469,159 Utility User Tax 1,756,000 1,888,414 1.0% 1,907,298 1,926,371 1,945,635 1,965,091 1,984,742 Charges for Services 1,726,844 1,450,000 3.0% 1,493,500 1,538,305 1,584,454 1,631,988 1,680,948 Licenses & Permits 814,000 894,966 1.0% 903,916 912,955 922,085 931,306 940,619 Other Revenues 5,138,015 4,922,300 1.0% 4,971,523 5,021,238 5,071,450 5,122,165 5,173,387 Total Revenues $ 31,371,177 $ 31,089,699 99.10% $ 31,923,947 $ 32,784,169 $ 33,671,228 30,689,259 31,554,760

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Salaries - Miscellaneous $ 4,995,999 $ 4,568,736 3.0% 5,145,879 5,300,255 5,459,263 5,623,041 5,791,732 Salaries - Safety 6,608,861 6,300,000 3.0% 6,807,127 7,011,341 7,221,681 7,438,331 7,661,481 Overtime - Miscellaneous 23,054 23,054 3.0% 23,746 24,458 25,192 25,948 26,726 Overtime - Safety 959,256 1,249,035 5.0% 1,311,487 1,377,061 1,445,914 1,518,210 1,594,121 Medical, Medicare, Allowances 2,154,041 1,687,241 5.0% 1,771,603 1,860,183 1,953,192 2,050,852 2,153,395 Pension Payments - Miscellaneous 1,107,837 1,107,837 n/a 1,143,000 1,255,000 1,341,000 1,438,000 1,524,000 Pension Payments - Public Safety 3,239,201 3,239,201 n/a 3,264,000 3,528,000 3,729,000 3,950,000 4,145,000 Debt Service - Pension Bonds 531,712 531,712 n/a 552,034 574,888 - - - Retirees' Medical (OPEB) 200,000 213,516 3.5% 220,989 228,724 236,729 245,015 253,591 Total Personnel $ 19,819,961 $ 18,920,333 $ 20,239,865 $ 21,159,910 $ 21,411,971 22,289,397 23,150,046 Non-Personnel
Workers' Compensation $ 569,446 $ 800,000 5.0% $ 840,000 $ 882,000 $ 926,100 $ 972,405 $ 1,021,025 General Liability & Insurance 764,824 753,344 7.0% 806,078 862,503 922,878 987,479 1,056,603 Legal Services 448,200 505,000 2.0% 515,100 525,402 535,910 546,628 557,561 Supplies, R&M, Misc Other 1,154,527 793,449 3.0% 1,189,163 1,224,838 1,261,583 1,299,430 1,338,413 Contract Services 4,059,615 3,359,615 2.0% 4,140,807 4,223,623 4,308,095 4,394,257 4,482,142 Utilities 693,067 625,979 2.5% 641,629 657,670 674,112 690,965 708,239 Capital Equipment 507,931 507,931 0.0% 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Other 952,734 984,329 3.0% 1,013,859 1,044,275 1,075,603 1,107,871 1,141,107 OPEB Trust Contribution - - n/a - - - - -
Pension Trust Contribution - - n/a - - - - -
Annual Reserve Contribution - - 399,049 409,802 420,890 383,616 394,435 Total Non-Personnel $ 9,150,344 $ 8,329,647 $ 9,945,685 $ 10,230,113 $ 10,525,171 10,782,651 11,099,525 Total Expenditures $ 28,970,305 $ 27,249,980 94.06% $ 30,185,550 $ 31,390,023 $ 31,937,142 33,072,048 34,249,571 Annual Operating Surplus (Deficit) $ 2,400,872 $ 3,839,719 $ 1,738,397 $ 1,394,146 $ 1,734,086 (2,382,789) (2,694,811) Available Fund Balance for Capital Improvements

SUMMARY
Beginning Capital Reserve Balance 8,479,000 3,749,000 (981,000) (5,711,000) (10,441,000) Annual Funding for Infrastructure (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) Ending Capital Reserve Balance/(Deficit) 3,749,000 (981,000) (5,711,000) (10,441,000) (15,171,000)

INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING
Street & Pavement Mtce 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 Sewer & Storm Drain 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Sidewalk Maintenance 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Building Maintenance 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 Total Infrastructure 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000

OPERATING RESERVE
Prior Year Ending Reserve Balance 15,664,877 $ 15,664,877 $ 16,053,498 $ 16,452,547 $ 16,862,349 17,283,239 17,666,855 Current Year Contribution to Reserves 392,140 388,621 399,049 409,802 420,890 383,616 394,435 Current Year Ending Reserve Balance $ 16,057,017 $ 16,053,498 $ 16,452,547 $ 16,862,349 $ 17,283,239 17,666,855 18,061,290 Five-Year Financial Forecast

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

ATTACHMENT V
Revised
Budget FY
2021-22
Projected YE FY
2021-22
Assumed
Projected
Growth Rate
Projected FY
2022-23
Projected FY
2023-24
Projected FY
2024-25
Projected FY
2025-26
Projected FY
2026-27
Projected FY
2027-28
Projected FY
2028-29
Projected FY
2029-30
Projected FY
2030-31
Projected FY
2031-32
Projected FY
2032-33
Projected FY
2033-34
Projected FY
2034-35

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Property Tax 17,939,000 17,939,000 3.5% 18,566,865 19,216,705 19,889,290 20,585,415 21,305,905 22,051,612 22,823,418 23,622,238 24,449,016 25,304,732 26,190,398 27,107,062 28,055,809 Public Safety Property Tax 3,597,318 3,600,000 2.0% 3,672,000 3,745,440 3,820,349 - - - - - - - - - - Sales Tax 400,000 395,019 3.5% 408,845 423,155 437,965 453,294 469,159 485,580 502,575 520,165 538,371 557,214 576,716 596,901 617,793 Utility User Tax 1,756,000 1,888,414 1.0% 1,907,298 1,926,371 1,945,635 1,965,091 1,984,742 2,004,589 2,024,635 2,044,881 2,065,330 2,085,983 2,106,843 2,127,911 2,149,190 Charges for Services 1,726,844 1,450,000 3.0% 1,493,500 1,538,305 1,584,454 1,631,988 1,680,948 1,731,376 1,783,317 1,836,817 1,891,922 1,948,680 2,007,140 2,067,354 2,129,375 Licenses & Permits 814,000 894,966 1.0% 903,916 912,955 922,085 931,306 940,619 950,025 959,525 969,120 978,811 988,599 998,485 1,008,470 1,018,555 Other Revenues 5,138,015 4,922,300 1.0% 4,971,523 5,021,238 5,071,450 5,122,165 5,173,387 5,225,121 5,277,372 5,330,146 5,383,447 5,437,281 5,491,654 5,546,571 5,602,037 Total Revenues 31,371,177 31,089,699 31,923,947 32,784,169 33,671,228 30,689,259 31,554,760 32,448,303 33,370,842 34,323,367 35,306,897 36,322,489 37,371,236 38,454,269 39,572,759

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Salaries - Miscellaneous 4,995,999 4,568,736 3.0% 5,145,879 5,300,255 5,459,263 5,623,041 5,791,732 5,965,484 6,144,449 6,328,782 6,518,645 6,714,204 6,915,630 7,123,099 7,336,792 Salaries - Safety 6,608,861 6,300,000 3.0% 6,807,127 7,011,341 7,221,681 7,438,331 7,661,481 7,891,325 8,128,065 8,371,907 8,623,064 8,881,756 9,148,209 9,422,655 9,705,335 Overtime - Miscellaneous 23,054 23,054 3.0% 23,746 24,458 25,192 25,948 26,726 27,528 28,354 29,205 30,081 30,983 31,912 32,869 33,855 Overtime - Safety 959,256 1,249,035 5.0% 1,311,487 1,377,061 1,445,914 1,518,210 1,594,121 1,673,827 1,757,518 1,845,394 1,937,664 2,034,547 2,136,274 2,243,088 2,355,242 Medical, Medicare, Allowances 2,154,041 1,687,241 5.0% 1,771,603 1,860,183 1,953,192 2,050,852 2,153,395 2,261,065 2,374,118 2,492,824 2,617,465 2,748,338 2,885,755 3,030,043 3,181,545 Pension Payments - Miscellaneous 1,107,837 1,107,837 n/a 1,143,000 1,255,000 1,341,000 1,438,000 1,524,000 1,601,000 1,689,000 1,769,000 1,870,000 1,964,000 2,061,000 2,126,000 2,166,000 Pension Payments - Public Safety 3,239,201 3,239,201 n/a 3,264,000 3,528,000 3,729,000 3,950,000 4,145,000 4,328,000 4,526,000 4,710,000 4,936,000 5,147,000 5,400,000 5,498,000 5,588,000 Debt Service - Pension Bonds 531,712 531,712 n/a 552,034 574,888 - - - - - - - - - - - Retirees' Medical (OPEB) 200,000 213,516 3.5% 220,989 228,724 236,729 245,015 253,591 262,467 271,653 281,161 291,002 301,187 311,729 322,640 333,932 Total Personnel 19,819,961 18,920,333 20,239,865 21,159,910 21,411,971 22,289,397 23,150,046 24,010,696 24,919,157 25,828,273 26,823,921 27,822,015 28,890,509 29,798,394 30,700,701 Non-Personnel
Workers' Compensation 569,446 800,000 5.0% 840,000 882,000 926,100 972,405 1,021,025 1,072,076 1,125,680 1,181,964 1,241,062 1,303,115 1,368,271 1,436,685 1,508,519 General Liability & Insurance 764,824 753,344 7.0% 806,078 862,503 922,878 987,479 1,056,603 1,130,565 1,209,705 1,294,384 1,384,991 1,481,940 1,585,676 1,696,673 1,815,440 Legal Services 448,200 505,000 2.0% 515,100 525,402 535,910 546,628 557,561 568,712 580,086 591,688 603,522 615,592 627,904 640,462 653,271 Supplies, R&M, Misc Other 1,154,527 793,449 3.0% 1,189,163 1,224,838 1,261,583 1,299,430 1,338,413 1,378,565 1,419,922 1,462,520 1,506,396 1,551,588 1,598,136 1,646,080 1,695,462 Contract Services 4,059,615 3,359,615 2.0% 4,140,807 4,223,623 4,308,095 4,394,257 4,482,142 4,571,785 4,663,221 4,756,485 4,851,615 4,948,647 5,047,620 5,148,572 5,251,543 Utilities 693,067 625,979 2.5% 641,629 657,670 674,112 690,965 708,239 725,945 744,094 762,696 781,763 801,307 821,340 841,874 862,921 Capital Equipment 507,931 507,931 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Other 952,734 984,329 3.0% 1,013,859 1,044,275 1,075,603 1,107,871 1,141,107 1,175,340 1,210,600 1,246,918 1,284,326 1,322,856 1,362,542 1,403,418 1,445,521 OPEB Trust Contribution - - n/a - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pension Trust Contribution - - n/a - - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve Contribution 399,049 409,802 420,890 383,616 394,435 405,604 417,136 429,042 441,336 454,031 467,140 480,678 494,659 Total Non-Personnel 9,150,344 8,329,647 9,945,685 10,230,113 10,525,171 10,782,651 11,099,525 11,428,592 11,770,444 12,125,697 12,495,011 12,879,076 13,278,629 13,694,442 14,127,336 Total Expenditures 28,970,305 27,249,980 30,185,550 31,390,023 31,937,142 33,072,048 34,249,571 35,439,288 36,689,601 37,953,970 39,318,932 40,701,091 42,169,138 43,492,836 44,828,037 Annual Operating Surplus (Deficit) 2,400,872 3,839,719 1,738,397 1,394,146 1,734,086 (2,382,789) (2,694,811) (2,990,985) (3,318,759) (3,630,603) (4,012,035) (4,378,602) (4,797,902) (5,038,567) (5,255,278) Available Fund Balance for Capital Improvements

SUMMARY
Beginning Capital Reserve Balance 18,324,777 18,324,777 10,170,359 5,440,359 710,359 (4,019,641) (8,749,641) (13,479,641) (18,209,641) (22,939,641) (27,669,641) (32,399,641) (37,129,641) (41,859,641) (46,589,641) Annual Funding for Infrastructure (12,654,418) (8,154,418) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (4,730,000) (1,866,297) Ending Capital Reserve Balance/(Deficit) 5,670,359 10,170,359 5,440,359 710,359 (4,019,641) (8,749,641) (13,479,641) (18,209,641) (22,939,641) (27,669,641) (32,399,641) (37,129,641) (41,859,641) (46,589,641) (48,455,938)

INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING
Street & Pavement Mtce 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 636,297 Sewer & Storm Drain 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Sidewalk Maintenance 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Building Maintenance 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 Total Infrastructure 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 4,730,000 1,866,297

OPERATING RESERVE
Prior Year Ending Reserve Balance 15,664,877 15,664,877 16,053,498 16,452,547 16,862,349 17,283,239 17,666,855 18,061,290 18,466,894 18,884,030 19,313,072 19,754,408 20,208,439 20,675,579 21,156,257 Current Year Contribution to Reserves 392,140 388,621 399,049 409,802 420,890 383,616 394,435 405,604 417,136 429,042 441,336 454,031 467,140 480,678 494,659 Current Year Ending Reserve Balance 16,057,017 16,053,498 16,452,547 16,862,349 17,283,239 17,666,855 18,061,290 18,466,894 18,884,030 19,313,072 19,754,408 20,208,439 20,675,579 21,156,257 21,650,916 General Fund Reserves as a % of General Fund Revenues 52% 51% 51% 58% 57% 57% 57% 56% 56% 56% 55% 55% 55% Long-Term Financial Projections
2/2/2022

ATTACHMENT V
Projected FY
2035-36
Projected FY
2036-37
Projected FY
2037-38
Projected FY
2038-39
Projected FY
2039-40
Projected FY
2040-41
Projected FY
2041-42
Projected FY
2042-43
Projected FY
2043-44
Projected FY
2044-45
Projected FY
2045-46
Projected FY
2046-47
Projected FY
2047-48
Projected FY
2048-49
Projected FY
2049-50
Projected FY
2050-51

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Property Tax 29,037,762 30,054,084 31,105,977 32,194,686 33,321,500 34,487,753 35,694,824 36,944,143 38,237,188 39,575,490 40,960,632 42,394,254 43,878,053 45,413,785 47,003,267 48,648,381 Public Safety Property Tax - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sales Tax 639,416 661,796 684,959 708,933 733,746 759,427 786,007 813,517 841,990 871,460 901,961 933,530 966,204 1,000,021 1,035,022 1,071,248 Utility User Tax 2,170,682 2,192,389 2,214,313 2,236,456 2,258,821 2,281,409 2,304,223 2,327,265 2,350,538 2,374,043 2,397,783 2,421,761 2,445,979 2,470,439 2,495,143 2,520,094 Charges for Services 2,193,256 2,259,054 2,326,826 2,396,631 2,468,530 2,542,586 2,618,864 2,697,430 2,778,353 2,861,704 2,947,555 3,035,982 3,127,061 3,220,873 3,317,499 3,417,024 Licenses & Permits 1,028,741 1,039,028 1,049,418 1,059,912 1,070,511 1,081,216 1,092,028 1,102,948 1,113,977 1,125,117 1,136,368 1,147,732 1,159,209 1,170,801 1,182,509 1,194,334 Other Revenues 5,658,057 5,714,638 5,771,784 5,829,502 5,887,797 5,946,675 6,006,142 6,066,203 6,126,865 6,188,134 6,250,015 6,312,515 6,375,640 6,439,396 6,503,790 6,568,828 Total Revenues 40,727,914 41,920,989 43,153,277 44,426,120 45,740,905 47,099,066 48,502,088 49,951,506 51,448,911 52,995,948 54,594,314 56,245,774 57,952,146 59,715,315 61,537,230 63,419,909

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Salaries - Miscellaneous 7,556,896 7,783,603 8,017,111 8,257,624 8,505,353 8,760,514 9,023,329 9,294,029 9,572,850 9,860,036 10,155,837 10,460,512 10,774,327 11,097,557 11,430,484 11,773,399 Salaries - Safety 9,996,495 10,296,390 10,605,282 10,923,440 11,251,143 11,588,677 11,936,337 12,294,427 12,663,260 13,043,158 13,434,453 13,837,487 14,252,612 14,680,190 15,120,596 15,574,214 Overtime - Miscellaneous 34,871 35,917 36,995 38,105 39,248 40,425 41,638 42,887 44,174 45,499 46,864 48,270 49,718 51,210 52,746 54,328 Overtime - Safety 2,473,004 2,596,654 2,726,487 2,862,811 3,005,952 3,156,250 3,314,063 3,479,766 3,653,754 3,836,442 4,028,264 4,229,677 4,441,161 4,663,219 4,896,380 5,141,199 Medical, Medicare, Allowances 3,340,622 3,507,653 3,683,036 3,867,188 4,060,547 4,263,574 4,476,753 4,700,591 4,935,621 5,182,402 5,441,522 5,713,598 5,999,278 6,299,242 6,614,204 6,944,914 Pension Payments - Miscellaneous 2,206,000 2,243,000 2,227,000 1,983,000 1,996,000 1,974,000 1,961,000 1,907,000 1,933,000 1,888,000 1,737,000 1,681,000 1,700,000 1,583,000 1,473,000 1,363,000 Pension Payments - Public Safety 5,646,000 5,702,000 5,634,000 4,737,000 4,692,000 4,644,000 4,677,000 4,489,000 4,408,000 4,260,000 3,985,000 3,831,000 3,843,000 3,623,000 3,513,000 3,403,000 Debt Service - Pension Bonds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Retirees' Medical (OPEB) 345,620 357,717 370,237 383,195 396,607 410,488 424,855 439,725 455,115 471,044 487,531 504,595 522,256 540,535 559,454 579,035 Total Personnel 31,599,508 32,522,934 33,300,148 33,052,363 33,946,850 34,837,928 35,854,975 36,647,425 37,665,774 38,586,581 39,316,471 40,306,139 41,582,352 42,537,953 43,659,864 44,833,089 Non-Personnel
Workers' Compensation 1,583,945 1,663,142 1,746,299 1,833,614 1,925,295 2,021,560 2,122,638 2,228,770 2,340,209 2,457,219 2,580,080 2,709,084 2,844,538 2,986,765 3,136,103 3,292,908 General Liability & Insurance 1,942,521 2,078,497 2,223,992 2,379,671 2,546,248 2,724,485 2,915,199 3,119,263 3,337,611 3,571,244 3,821,231 4,088,717 4,374,927 4,681,172 5,008,854 5,359,474 Legal Services 666,336 679,663 693,256 707,121 721,263 735,688 750,402 765,410 780,718 796,332 812,259 828,504 845,074 861,975 879,215 896,799 Supplies, R&M, Misc Other 1,746,326 1,798,716 1,852,677 1,908,257 1,965,505 2,024,470 2,085,204 2,147,760 2,212,193 2,278,559 2,346,916 2,417,323 2,489,843 2,564,538 2,641,474 2,720,718 Contract Services 5,356,574 5,463,705 5,572,979 5,684,439 5,798,128 5,914,091 6,032,373 6,153,020 6,276,080 6,401,602 6,529,634 6,660,227 6,793,432 6,929,301 7,067,887 7,209,245 Utilities 884,494 906,606 929,271 952,503 976,316 1,000,724 1,025,742 1,051,386 1,077,671 1,104,613 1,132,228 1,160,534 1,189,547 1,219,286 1,249,768 1,281,012 Capital Equipment 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Other 1,488,887 1,533,554 1,579,561 1,626,948 1,675,756 1,726,029 1,777,810 1,831,144 1,886,078 1,942,660 2,000,940 2,060,968 2,122,797 2,186,481 2,252,075 2,319,637 OPEB Trust Contribution - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pension Trust Contribution - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve Contribution 509,099 524,012 539,416 555,327 571,761 588,738 606,276 624,394 643,111 662,449 682,429 703,072 724,402 746,441 769,215 792,749 Total Non-Personnel 14,578,182 15,047,895 15,537,451 16,047,880 16,580,272 17,135,785 17,715,644 18,321,147 18,953,671 19,614,678 20,305,717 21,028,429 21,784,560 22,575,959 23,404,591 24,272,542 Total Expenditures 46,177,690 47,570,829 48,837,599 49,100,243 50,527,122 51,973,713 53,570,619 54,968,572 56,619,445 58,201,259 59,622,188 61,334,568 63,366,912 65,113,912 67,064,455 69,105,631 Annual Operating Surplus (Deficit) (5,449,776) (5,649,840) (5,684,322) (4,674,123) (4,786,217) (4,874,647) (5,068,531) (5,017,066) (5,170,534) (5,205,311) (5,027,874) (5,088,794) (5,414,766) (5,398,597) (5,527,225) (5,685,722) Available Fund Balance for Capital Improvements

SUMMARY
Beginning Capital Reserve Balance (48,455,938) (50,322,235) (52,188,533) (54,054,830) (55,921,127) (57,787,424) (59,653,721) (61,520,019) (63,386,316) (65,252,613) (67,118,910) (68,985,207) (70,851,505) (72,717,802) (74,584,099) (76,450,396) Annual Funding for Infrastructure (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) (1,866,297) Ending Capital Reserve Balance/(Deficit) (50,322,235) (52,188,533) (54,054,830) (55,921,127) (57,787,424) (59,653,721) (61,520,019) (63,386,316) (65,252,613) (67,118,910) (68,985,207) (70,851,505) (72,717,802) (74,584,099) (76,450,396) (78,316,693)

INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING
Street & Pavement Mtce 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 636,297 Sewer & Storm Drain 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Sidewalk Maintenance 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Building Maintenance 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 380,000 Total Infrastructure 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297 1,866,297

OPERATING RESERVE
Prior Year Ending Reserve Balance 21,650,916 22,160,015 22,684,027 23,223,443 23,778,770 24,350,531 24,939,269 25,545,545 26,169,939 26,813,050 27,475,499 28,157,928 28,861,000 29,585,402 30,331,843 31,101,058 Current Year Contribution to Reserves 509,099 524,012 539,416 555,327 571,761 588,738 606,276 624,394 643,111 662,449 682,429 703,072 724,402 746,441 769,215 792,749 Current Year Ending Reserve Balance 22,160,015 22,684,027 23,223,443 23,778,770 24,350,531 24,939,269 25,545,545 26,169,939 26,813,050 27,475,499 28,157,928 28,861,000 29,585,402 30,331,843 31,101,058 31,893,807 General Fund Reserves as a % of General Fund Revenues
Long-Term Financial Projections
2/2/2022

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
• Safe Community
• Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
Since 2006, All City Management Services Inc. has been providing crossing guard services to our community, ensuring that children get to and from our schools in a safe manner.

All City Management Services Inc. is a private corporation specifically and exclusively providing school crossing guard services. They have been in business for over 30 years and currently provide crossing guard services to over 100 cities, counties, school districts, and police departments in California. All City Management Services, Inc. oversees all areas of the crossing guard program, which includes recruitment of guards, background clearance, hiring, training, payroll, supervision, and overall management of the program.

DISCUSSION
Thus far, staff has been very satisfied with the services provided by All City Management Services.

Staff recently looked into other viable companies that provide similar services. After conducting a survey of several local agencies in the San Gabriel Valley, staff found that roughly 90% of the agencies surveyed already have an agreement with All City Management Services, Inc. The remaining cities either were considering All City Management Services, Inc., or currently hire TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: John N. Incontro, Police Chief
Aaron Blonde’, Police Commander
DATE: February 9, 2022
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MARINO AND ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR CROSSING GUARD

SERVICES
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

their own part-time staff whose primary duty is to provide crossing guard services. There are no other third-party organization who provide this service.

Under this new agreement, All City Management Services, Inc. will provide a total of 7,305 hours of crossing guard coverage during a normal school year, which includes Summer School. The dates for crossing guard services were confirmed with the San Marino Unified School District.

Staff recommends the City Council approve the agreement with All City Management Services, Inc. for a three-year period beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2024. Under the new agreement, the City agrees to pay the contractor for services rendered at $25.87 per hour in the first year of the contract. This is reflective of the California mandated minimum wage increase effective January 1, 2021. There is another increase of approximately $1.00 per hour expected to be effective January 1, 2022, another January 1, 2023, and a final increase January 1, 2024. For each dollar of wages paid, there is approximately .35 cents in variable cost associated with the wages, which includes employer taxes, work comp insurance, and liability insurance.

The agreement needs to be backdated to July 1, 2021 as the contract expired on June 30, 2021.

The Department had staff turnover that resulted in the oversight of establishing a new agreement and delay in generating a new contract with All City Management. The school crossing guard services is a necessary service to protect the students, so services were rendered as the contract was being finalized. To mitigate future contracts from expiring, the Department has reviewed all active contracts for contract compliance. The Department will develop an improved internal contract tracking process for contract compliance. The Finance Department has also manually generated a Contract Tracking spreadsheet to track all active/inactive contracts.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
During the 2021 – 22 budget process, $173,226 was budgeted for crossing guard services. The actual cost of these services is $191,998.05, a difference of $18,772.05. The Department is requesting an appropriation in the amount of $18,772.05 to Other Contract Services account 103-30-4159-0000. The total cost to the City during this three-year agreement is $598,667.40.

The table below provides the contract costs per school year:

Account Number School Year Contract Cost
103-30-4150-0000 2021 – 2022 School Year* $191,998.05
103-30-4150-0000 2022 – 2023 School Year* $198,476.85
103-30-4150-0000 2023 – 2024 School Year* $208,192.50
Total for Three-Years $598,667.40
* Includes Summer School session

This contract is in accordance with S.M.C.C. 02.06.05 B. 2 as the best interests of the City are served by dispensing with competitive bidding for this agreement. The City has been using All City Management Services, Inc. for crossing guard services for approximately 15 years. They have provided excellent service, are responsive to staff’s requests, and quickly resolve concerns.

The Finance Director has reviewed this report and determined in writing that this agreement is in the best interest of the City. (Attachment 4).

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office has reviewed the contract and approved it as to legal form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council approve the agreement for crossing guard services provided by All City Management Services Inc., and appropriate funds in the amount of $18,772.05 in support of this agreement. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to approve the agreement between the City of San Marino and All City Management Services, Inc. for crossing guard services beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2024, and appropriate funds in the amount of $18,772 to the Other Contract Services account 103-30- 4150-0000.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. All City Management Services Letter for Client Worksheet

2. All City Management Services Inc. Client Worksheets 2021 – 2024

3. Agreement between the City of San Marino and All City Management Services Inc. for Crossing Guard Services

4. Memorandum for Waiver of Bid for Crossing Guard Services – Chief Incontro

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Remove Watermark Wondershare
PDFelement

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Remove Watermark Wondershare
PDFelement

Remove Watermark Wondershare
PDFelement

Remove Watermark Wondershare
PDFelement

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MARINO
AND ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

FOR CROSSING GUARD SERVICES
This AGREEMENT made and entered into this ____________, 2021 by and between the CITY OF SAN MARINO a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City", and ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., hereinafter called the "Contractor".

WITNESSETH
The parties hereto have mutually covenanted and agreed as follows:

1. This Agreement is for a three-year period which commences July 1, 2021 and ends on June 30, 2024 and for such term thereafter as the parties may agree upon.

2. The Contractor will provide personnel equipped and trained in appropriate procedures for crossing pedestrians in marked crosswalks. Such personnel shall be herein referred to as a Crossing Guard.

3. Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. All services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Contractor or under its supervision. Contractor will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the services. Any additional personnel performing services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law. Contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

4. The City's representative in dealing with the Contractor shall be designated by City of San Marino.

5. If, at any time during the contract period, the City questions the meaning of any item of this Agreement, the City may contact the Contractor for interpretation of that item.

6. The City shall determine the locations where Crossing Guards shall be furnished by the Contractor.

The Contractor shall provide at each designated location personnel properly trained as herein specified for the performance of duties as a Crossing Guard. The Contractor shall provide supervisory personnel to see that Crossing Guard activities are taking place at the required places and times, and in accordance with all items of this Agreement. Contractor shall notify City if a Crossing Guard or designated alternative will not be at his or her assigned post 30 minutes before the start of the assigned shift.

7. The Contractor shall maintain adequate reserve personnel to be able to furnish alternate Crossing Guards in the event that any person fails to report for work at the assigned time and location and agrees to provide immediate replacement. In the event that a Crossing Guard is not at the assigned

location within 15 minutes from the start of the assigned shift, City shall deduct one (1) hours from its monthly payment to Contractor regardless of whether the Crossing Guard was absent for the full shift or only for part of the shift.

8. In the performance of their duties the Contractor and all employees of the Contractor shall conduct themselves in accordance with the conditions of this Agreement and the laws and codes of the State of California and the City of San Marino.

9. Persons provided by the Contractor as Crossing Guards shall be trained in the laws and codes of the State of California and the City of San Marino pertaining to general pedestrian safety in school crossing areas.

10. Crossing Guard Services shall be provided by the Contractor at the designated locations on all days in which the designated schools in the City of San Marino are in session. The Contractor shall also provide, as requested by the City, Crossing Guard Services during Summer School typically for the months of June through July. The Contractor also agrees to maintain communication with the designated school to maintain proper scheduling.

11. The Contractor shall provide all Crossing Guards with apparel by which they are readily visible and easily recognized as Crossing Guards. Such apparel shall be uniform for all persons performing the duties of Crossing Guards and shall be worn at all times while performing said duties. This apparel must be appropriate for weather conditions. The Contractor shall also provide all Crossing Guards with hand-held Stop signs and any other safety equipment which may be necessary.

12. The Contractor shall at all times provide workers' compensation insurance covering its employees and shall provide and maintain liability insurance for Crossing Guard activities. The Contractor will provide to the City a Certificate of Insurance naming the City and its officials, officers and employees as additional insureds. Such insurance shall include commercial general liability with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence and $4,000,000.00 in aggregate for property damage and bodily injury. Such insurance shall be primary with respect to any insurance maintained by the City and shall not call on the City's insurance contributions. Such insurance shall be endorsed for contractual liability and personal injury and shall include the City, its officers, agents and interest of the City. Such insurance shall not be canceled, reduced in coverage or limits or nonrenewed except after thirty (30) days written notice has been given to the City.

13. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against any and all actions, claims for damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities (each a “Claim” and collectively, the “Claims”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of the negligent acts or omissions, or willful misconduct, of Contractor, its agents, employees, subcontractors, representatives or invitees. a) Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses including attorney's fees incurred in connection herewith.
b) Contractor will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities.

c) In the event the City its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Contractor for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the sole negligence of Contractor hereunder, Contractor agrees to pay the City, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees.
d) In the event that a court determines that liability for any Claim was caused or contributed to by the negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of the City, liability will be apportioned between Contractor and the City based upon the parties’ respective degrees of culpability, as determined by the court, and Contractor’s duty to indemnify the City will be limited accordingly.
e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, Contractor’s indemnification obligation to City for Claims under this Agreement will be limited to the maximum combined aggregate of Contractor’s general liability and umbrella insurance policies in the amount of $4,000,000 (Four Million Dollars).

14. Either party shall have the right to cancel this Agreement by giving sixty (60) days written notice to the other.

15. The Contractor shall not have the right to assign this Agreement to any other person or firm except with the prior written consent of the City.

16. The City agrees to pay the Contractor for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement the sum of Twenty-five Dollars and Eighty-seven Cents ($25.87) per hour of Crossing Guard services provided.

It is understood and agreed that the cost of providing Seven Thousand, Four Hundred and Thirty-one (7,431) hours of service shall not exceed One Hundred Ninety-one Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ninety-eight Dollars, ($191,998.00) for the 2021/2022 School Year.

The City agrees to pay the Contractor for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement the sum of Twenty-seven Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($27.17) per hour of Crossing Guard services provided. It is understood and agreed that the cost of providing Seven Thousand, Three Hundred and Five (7,305) hours of service shall not exceed One Hundred Ninety-eight Thousand, Four Hundred and Seventyseven Dollars, ($198,477.00) for the 2022/2023 School Year.

The City agrees to pay the Contractor for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement the sum of Twenty-eight Dollars and Fifty Cents ($28.50) per hour of Crossing Guard services provided. It is understood and agreed that the cost of providing Seven Thousand, Three Hundred and Five (7,305) hours of service shall not exceed Two Hundred Eight Thousand, One Hundred and Ninety-three Dollars, ($208,193.00) for the 2023/2024 School Year.

17. Undisputed Payment is due to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor's properly prepared invoice.

18. Contractor may request a price increase during the term as a result of any legally-mandated increases in wages or benefits imposed in the state or municipality in which the Services are to be performed and to which Contractor’s employees would be subject. Contractor shall provide the City with 60

days-notice of its request to increase pricing. The City agrees to review and respond to said notice within 30 days of receipt.

19. The City shall have an option to renew this Agreement. In the event this Agreement is extended beyond the end of the term set forth above, the compensation and terms for the Services shall be established by mutual consent of both parties.

20. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior written or oral statements among the parties, including any prior statements, warranties, or representations. This Agreement is binding upon and will inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, administrators, executors, successors, and assigns. Each party hereto agrees that this Agreement will be governed by the law of the state in which the Services are to be performed, without regard to its conflicts of law provisions. Any amendments, modifications, or alterations to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by all parties. There will be no presumption against any party on the ground that such party was responsible for preparing this Agreement or any part of it. Each provision of this Agreement is severable from the other provisions. If any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid or contrary to existing law, the inoperability of that provision will have no effect on the remaining provisions of the Agreement which will continue in full force and effect. [SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

City of San Marino All City Management Services, Inc.

By_____________________________ By______________________________ Signature Demetra Farwell, Corporate Secretary
_____________________________ Date___________________
Print Name and Title
Date____________________________
By_____________________________
Signature
____________________________
Print Name and Title
Date____________________________

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Engaged and Connected Residents
• Safe Community

BACKGROUND
In response to concerns expressed by a resident and an increase in vehicular crashes in late 2021, the Parks and Public Works Department commissioned a review of existing striping along the westbound section of Huntington Drive between Monterey Road and Westhaven Road.

Transtech Engineers, the City’s traffic engineer, performed the review and has made recommendations that have been discussed by the Public Safety Commission. In order for the Department to make the recommended striping changes, approval by the City Council is requested.

DISCUSSION
At the request of the Department, Transtech Engineers reviewed this segment of Huntington Drive due to the vehicular collisions with fixed objects, in this case, the northwest corner of Westhaven Road and Huntington Drive. This segment of Huntington Drive was resurfaced in early 2017 and the striping appears to have been replaced to its pre-resurfacing configuration.

The recent accident history lends itself to the conclusion that due to a variety of factors it is not clear to drivers there is no fourth lane between Monterey Road and Westhaven Road. This creates a situation where the driver has no choice but to make an unanticipated merge into the number three lane of westbound Huntington Drive.

To resolve this situation, a restriping is needed to reduce the existing potential for traffic collisions with other vehicles and fixed objects. The recommended striping plan (see Attachment TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: Michael Throne, PE, Director of Parks and Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 9, 2022
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF STRIPING AND SIGNING MODIFICATIONS TO

IMPROVE VEHICULAR SAFETY ALONG WESTBOUND

HUNTINGTON DRIVE BETWEEN MONTEREY ROAD AND

WESTHAVEN ROAD
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

1 pages 5 through 7) includes the placement of object markers, new signs and reflective tape, and modification of striping between the angle parking and the number three westbound through lane. The traffic engineer recommends the installation of post delineators at the end of the parking lane merge onto Huntington Drive to visually reinforce the need for drivers to change lanes.

This work complements the striping modification that is currently being bid at the northwest corner of Sierra Madre Boulevard at Huntington Drive.

The Department reviewed the striping recommendations with the Chief of Police, who supports making improvements at this corner to improve traffic safety. The Public Safety Commission reviewed this situation at their February 7, 2022 meeting and their recommendations will be presented at tonight’s meeting.

For the Department to effect the recommended striping changes, City Council approval is requested.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The City budgets annually $45,000 for striping and marking, and if approved these changes (estimated at approximately $8,500) would be incorporated into that program.

LEGAL REVIEW
This report has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council review and approve the striping and marking modifications recommended by the City’s traffic engineer. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to approve the striping, signing, and pavement marking modifications as recommended by the City’s traffic engineer for westbound Huntington Drive between Monterey Road and Westhaven Road.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Traffic review at Westhaven Road at Huntington Drive. Transtech. January 2022.

City of San Marino |
TO: City of San Marino
Michael Throne, Public Works Director/City Engineer
FROM: Transtech Engineers, Inc.

DATE: January 31, 2022
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC REVIEW AT WESTHAVEN ROAD AT HUNTINGTON DRIVE PREPARER’S CERTIFICATION
This Report was prepared by:

Jana Robbins, PTP, RSP
E-mail: [email protected]
Bahman Janka, PE
E-mail: [email protected]
This report was prepared under the supervisions of:

Bahman Janka, PE

CERTIFICATION BY ENGINEER
___________________________
Bahman Janka, PE
License Type: Traffic
License Number: 1520

INTRODUCTION
The City of San Marino received resident inquires to evaluate the intersection of Westhaven Road at Huntington Drive. In response to this request and on behalf of the City, traffic engineering staff completed a traffic review to evaluate the intersection signage installation and existing roadway conditions at the intersection of Westhaven Road and Huntington Drive. Residents have expressed concerns with vehicles rapidly approaching the intersection and getting confused by existing roadway striping. The traffic review included an analysis of the existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 5.5 years of available collision data, utilization of California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and California Vehicle Code (CVC) standards.

TRAFFIC REVIEW WESTHAVEN ROAD AT HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAFETY REVIEW City of San Marino |
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Existing Conditions
LEGEND Review Intersection: Westhaven Road and
Huntington Drive
LEGEND
Existing Red Curb
Huntington Dr
Huntington Dr
Stop Sign (R1-1)
No Trucks sign
(R5-2) with 3-ton
max
One way sign
(R6-2)

TRAFFIC REVIEW WESTHAVEN ROAD AT HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAFETY REVIEW City of San Marino |

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Westhaven Road: Within the City of San Marino, Westhaven Road is considered to be a local road per the Caltrans Roadway Classification, and is approximately 40’ (feet) wide with one travel lane in each direction and no center line. Parking is permitted on both sides of the roadway except areas designated by red curb.

Westhaven Road has a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph. Land use along Westhaven Road is zoned as very low density residential except on the east corner of the intersection with Huntington Drive which is commercial. Westhaven Road at Huntington Drive is stop controlled at Huntington Drive for southbound traffic.

Huntington Drive: Within the City of San Marino, Huntington Drive is considered a principal arterial road per the Caltrans Roadway Classification and is approximately 40’ (feet) wide heading westbound and approximately 35’ (feet) wide heading eastbound with three travel lanes in each direction and a raised center median. Huntington Drive has a designating parking space shoulder lane on the westbound side of the street between Westhaven Road and Monterey Avenue. Parking is permitted on the north and south side of the roadway except where there is red curb designating no parking. Huntington Drive has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Land use along Huntington Drive is zoned as commercial to the east of the intersection and very low density to the west of the intersection.

COLLISION INVESTIGATION:

A Collision History Analysis was conducted for the subject intersection. Collision data was obtained from the computerized collision records system maintained by the State of California called the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS). An analysis was conducted of the available collisions that were reported within 250-feet of the subject intersection of Westhaven Road and Huntington Drive. The collision analysis was conducted over a 5.5-year period between January 2016 to the most recent available collision data, January 2022. Based on the information provided, a summary breakdown of the number of collisions within the studied intersection are listed below and shown in Figure 3 and Table 1. 2021: 2 collisions
2020: 2 collisions
2019: 1 collision
2018: 2 collisions
Total: 7 collisions

TRAFFIC REVIEW WESTHAVEN ROAD AT HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAFETY REVIEW City of San Marino |
Table 1: Collision List for the intersection of Westhaven Road and Huntington Drive Figure 3 provides a collision diagram for the reported collisions within 250-feet of the intersection of Westhaven Road and Huntington Drive.

TRAFFIC REVIEW WESTHAVEN ROAD AT HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAFETY REVIEW City of San Marino |
LEGEND
ALL COLLISIONS - Crash Type
(Non-Ped & Bike Collisions/Crashes)
# of
Crashes
Fatality (Death) 0
Severe Injury 0
Injury - Other Visible 0
Injury - Complaint of Pain 2
Property Damage Only 5
Total 7
PED & BIKE - Crash Type # of
Crashes
Fatality (Death) 0
Severe Injury 0
Injury - Other Visible 0
Injury - Complaint of Pain 0
Property Damage Only 0
Total 0
TOTAL CRASHES 5
Huntington Dr
Bedford Rd
Figure 3: Collision Diagram
3 4
5 6
7 Roanoke Rd
2 Huntington Dr
1

TRAFFIC REVIEW WESTHAVEN ROAD AT HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAFETY REVIEW City of San Marino |

RECOMMENDATIONS
A) Signing and striping Review and Recommendations:

After a thorough review of existing field and traffic conditions and per the guidelines in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), California Vehicle Code (CVC), and based on engineering judgement, it was determined that the intersection of Huntington Drive and Westhaven Road would benefit from additional upgraded signage and striping.

The placement of all traffic control devices is dictated by engineering judgment and based on guidelines found in the CAMUTCD (California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices) and the CVC (California vehicle Code). It was determined that the following measures should be installed approaching and at the intersection of Huntington Drive and Westhaven Road:

1. Install an Object Marker (O3M-L (CA)) approximately 10 feet west from intersection on existing light pole facing westbound traffic on Huntington Dr. See exhibit diagram.

2. Replace post and raise existing stop sign (R1-1). Remove existing one-way sign (R6-1R) for southbound traffic and replace with right turn only (R3-5R) sign (the bottom of this sign should be a minimum of 5’ from the surface). Install object marker (OM3-L) facing westbound traffic on Huntington Dr. See exhibit diagram.

3. Install reflective tape along north west curb at the intersection of westbound Huntington Drive and Westhaven Road from BCR to light pole and from BCR to existing red curb. See exhibit diagram.

4. Install one way sign (R6-1R) in median facing southbound traffic on Westhaven Road. See exhibit diagram.

5. Upgrade existing median at corner of Huntington Drive and Westhaven Road with additional striping and white delineators. Match existing channelization lines and remove conflicting striping. See exhibit diagram.

6. Refurbish existing lines for westbound Huntington Drive to distinguish traffic lanes from nontraffic areas. See striping detail for line widths. Remove conflicting striping. See exhibit diagram.

INSTALLATION EXHIBIT 1A: SAN MARINO, CA – HUNTINGTON DRIVE AT WESTHAVEN ROAD JANUARY 25TH, 2022

REFURBISH EXISTING LINES FOR WESTBOUND HUNTINGTON DRIVE TO DISTINGUISH TRAFFIC LANES FROM NONTRAFFIC AREAS. SEE STRIPING DETAIL FOR LINE WIDTHS. REMOVE CONFLICTING STRIPING.

UPGRADE EXISTING MEDIAN AT CORNER OF HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND WESTHAVEN ROAD WITH ADDITIONAL STRIPING AND DELINEATORS.

MATCH EXISTING CHANNELIZATION LINES AND REMOVE CONFLICTING STRIPING.
1 3
2 REPLACE POST AND RAISE EXISTING STOP SIGN (R1-1). REMOVE EXISTING ONE-WAY SIGN (R6-1R) FOR SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC AND REPLACE WITH RIGHT TURN ONLY (R3-5R) SIGN. INSTALL OBJECT MARKER (OM3-L) FACING WEST BOUND TRAFFIC ON HUNTINGTON DR. 1 INSTALL AN OBJECT MARKER (OM3-L) APPROXIMATELY 10 FEET WEST FROM INTERSECTION ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE FACING WB TRAFFIC. 4 2 5 6
Huntington Dr
3 4
INSTALL ONE WAY SIGN (R6-1R) IN MEDIAN FACING SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC ALONG WESTHAVEN ROAD.

INSTALL REFLECTIVE TAPE ALONG NORTH WEST CURB AT THE

INTERSECTION OF WESTBOUND HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND WESTHAVEN

ROAD FROM BCR TO LIGHT POLE AND FROM BCR TO EXISTING RED CURB. SEE EXHIBIT DIAGRAM.
5 6
NOTE: COLOR USED TO SHOW DIMENSION OF STRIPING. ALL STRIPING TO BE INSTALLED WHITE. REMOVE ALL CONFLICTING MARKINGS.
8 INCH WHITE STRIPING

OVER EXISTING STRIPING
12 INCH WHITE

STRIPING
15 FEET APART
4 INCH WHITE STRIPING

MATCH EXISTING

CHANNELIZATION WIDTH
Huntington Dr

INSTALLATION EXHIBIT 1B: SAN MARINO, CA – HUNTINGTON DRIVE AT WESTHAVEN ROAD JANUARY 25TH, 2022
5 6

REFURBISH EXISTING LINES FOR WESTBOUND HUNTINGTON DRIVE TO DISTINGUISH TRAFFIC LANES FROM NONTRAFFIC AREAS. SEE STRIPING DETAIL FOR LINE WIDTHS. REMOVE CONFLICTING STRIPING.

UPGRADE EXISTING MEDIAN AT CORNER OF HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND

WESTHAVEN ROAD WITH ADDITIONAL STRIPING AND WHITE
DELINEATORS. MATCH EXISTING CHANNELIZATION LINES AND REMOVE CONFLICTING STRIPING.
1 3
2 REPLACE POST AND RAISE EXISTING STOP SIGN (R1-1). REMOVE EXISTING ONE-WAY SIGN (R6-1R) FOR SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC AND REPLACE WITH RIGHT TURN ONLY (R3-5R) SIGN (THE BOTTOM OF THIS SIGN SHOULD BE MINIMUM 5’ ABOVE SURFACE). INSTALL OBJECT MARKER (OM3-L) FACING WEST BOUND TRAFFIC ON HUNTINGTON DR.

INSTALL AN OBJECT MARKER (OM3-L) APPROXIMATELY 10 FEET WEST

FROM INTERSECTION ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE FACING WB TRAFFIC ON Huntington DR.
4 INSTALL ONE WAY SIGN (R6-1R) IN MEDIAN FACING SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC ON HAVEN ROAD.

INSTALL REFLECTIVE TAPE ALONG NORTH WEST CURB AT THE

INTERSECTION OF WESTBOUND HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND HAVEN ROAD FROM BCR TO LIGHT POLE AND FROM BCR TO EXISTING RED CURB. SEE EXHIBIT DIAGRAM.
5 6
1 2
3 2
4 Huntington Dr

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
• Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The City publishes a report on total disbursements each month pursuant to Government Code Sections 37202 and 37208.

There are three source points for disbursement: (1) items disbursed from the City’s General Checking account, including electronic funds transfers (EFTs); (2) items disbursed from the City’s Workers’ Compensation Account (collaboratively managed by City staff and the workers’ compensation third-party administrator); and (3) items disbursed through the payroll process, inclusive of direct deposit transfers to employees, hardcopy checks issued to employees, and electronic transfers to State and Federal taxing authorities.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
Procurement review is not applicable.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: Paul Chung, Finance Director
Mark Siegfried, Accounting Manager/Controller
DATE: February 9, 2022
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT FOR JANUARY 2022
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

JANUARY 2022 DISBURSEMENTS SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES BY MONTH – PAST SIX MONTHS VERSUS PRIOR YEAR Description Amount
General Account Checks $ 322,448
General Account Electronic Fund Transfers 853,690
Worker's Compensation Checks 16,092
Salaries and Taxes Paid 849,156
$ 2,041,386
Operating Expenditures $ 1,991,336 98%
CIP Expenditures 2% 50,050
$ 2,041,386
Schedule of Disbursements - January 2022

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of January 2022. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of January 2022.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. January 2022 Transactions by Account Summary

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

User:

Printed: 01/27/2022 - 8:11AM
MSiegfried
Transactions by Account
Batch: 00000.00.0000
Accounts Payable
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-00-1060-0000 Bob Wondries Grille 01/14/2022 0 171.12 101-00-1060-0000 Bob Wondries Weather Stripping 01/28/2022 0 272.54 101-00-1060-0000 Bob Wondries Weather Stripping 01/28/2022 0 212.34 101-00-1060-0000 Bob Wondries Molding 01/28/2022 0 205.02 101-00-1060-0000 Bob Wondries Credit 01/28/2022 0 -152.12 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 708.90
101-00-1060-0000 Hose-Man Inc Hoses 01/28/2022 15214 168.59 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 168.59
101-00-1060-0000 Interstate Battery Systems of Batteries 01/28/2022 0 400.47 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 400.47
101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Filters 01/14/2022 0 28.62 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Odor Remover for Cars 01/14/2022 0 26.01 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Wiper Blades 01/14/2022 0 199.66 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Brake Pads & Rotors 01/28/2022 0 301.33 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Spark Plug 01/28/2022 0 8.80 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Ignition Coil 01/28/2022 0 73.19 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Filters 01/28/2022 0 130.93 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 768.54
101-00-1060-0000 Thorson Motor Center Sensor 01/28/2022 15242 106.52 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 106.52
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-00-1060-0000 Tire Hub Tires (5) 01/28/2022 15245 841.61 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 841.61
101-00-3040-0000 California American Water Franchise Fee Nov-Dec 2021 01/14/2022 15145 124.45 101-00-3040-0000 California American Water Franchise Fees Dec 2021-Jan2022 01/28/2022 15194 19.16 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 143.61
101-01-4376-0000 Office Depot Water 01/14/2022 15162 7.57 101-01-4376-0000 Office Depot Council Meeting Supplies 01/28/2022 15227 15.08 Vendor Subtotal for Department:01 22.65
101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 1,320.00 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 2,598.22 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 220.00 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 3,217.50 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 2,405.00 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 13,440.80 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 412.50 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 1,952.50 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 1,854.50 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 477.00 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 841.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:06 28,739.52
101-06-4106-2756 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 372.50 101-06-4106-2756 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 9,426.50 101-06-4106-2756 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service-Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 4,485.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:06 14,284.00
101-06-4106-2756 Richards Watson & Gershon Legal Service Nov 2021 01/14/2022 0 125.00 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:06 125.00
101-06-4106-2757 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Covid-19 Legal Service Nov 2021 01/28/2022 0 192.50 101-06-4106-2757 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Covid-19 Legal Service-Dec 2021 01/28/2022 0 3,059.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:06 3,251.50
101-06-4106-2757 Steve A Filarsky, Attorney at Law Covid-19 Legal Service Dec 2021 01/14/2022 0 6,217.75 Vendor Subtotal for Department:06 6,217.75
101-08-4016-0000 John Penido Medical Retirement Jan 2022 01/28/2022 0 644.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 644.00
101-08-4016-0000 PERS (Medical) Medical Retired Premium Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 14,150.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 14,150.00
101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cell Phone Service - Dec 2021 (Uniform) 01/14/2022 15142 2,303.66 101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cell Phone Service - Dec 2021 (Non-Uniform) 01/14/2022 15142 1,745.41 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 4,049.07
101-08-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility Hot Spot Service - Dec 2021 (Uniform) 01/14/2022 15142 60.00 101-08-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service - Dec 2021 (Non-Uniform) 01/14/2022 15142 70.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 130.00
101-08-4376-0000 FatCat Translation Service LLC Chinese Translation-Covid-19 Update 12/29/2101/14/2022 0 59.70 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 59.70
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-08-4376-0000 IntelesysOne Stoneman Cabling Project-Covid Protcols 01/28/2022 0 914.83 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 914.83
101-08-4376-0000 Language Network, INC Chinese Translation-Covid-19 Update 12/28/2101/28/2022 0 168.75 101-08-4376-0000 Language Network, INC Chinese Translation-Covid-19 Update 1/3/22 01/28/2022 0 176.75 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 345.50
101-08-4376-0000 Vital Medical Service, LLC Covid-19 Rapid Test (60) 01/14/2022 15178 5,100.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:08 5,100.00
101-09-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 31.95 101-09-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 7.65 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 39.60
101-09-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 719.78 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 719.78
101-09-4150-0000 Advance Pure Water Solutions Water Filtration System Feb 2022 01/14/2022 15137 41.61 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 41.61
101-09-4150-0000 FatCat Translation Service LLC Chinese Translation-SB 1383 01/14/2022 0 69.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 69.00
101-09-4150-0500 Pacific Insurance Network Systems Insurance Certificate Management 01/14/2022 0 125.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 125.00
101-09-4150-0500 Sterling Codifiers Inc Supplement Editing O-21-1382-O-21-1384 01/14/2022 15173 1,432.26 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-09-4150-0500 Sterling Codifiers Inc Codifier Annual Web Hosting 1/22-1/23 01/14/2022 15173 500.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 1,932.26
101-09-4202-0000 LC - M News Inc Notice N-21-28 O-21-1385U Adoption Summary Pd 12/2/21 01/28/2022 15228 575.00 101-09-4202-0000 LC - M News Inc Notice N-21-27 Sum Ord SB9 Pd 12/2/21 01/28/2022 15228 631.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 1,206.00
101-09-4376-0000 Office Depot Paper & Pens 01/14/2022 15162 54.07 101-09-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 01/28/2022 15227 122.85 Vendor Subtotal for Department:09 176.92
101-10-4010-0000 Humana Insurance Co Adjustment Premium Jan 2022 01/14/2022 15155 18.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 18.00
101-10-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 10.65 101-10-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 2.55 Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 13.20
101-10-4150-0000 Holman Professional Counseling Centers Employee Assistance Program Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 541.68 Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 541.68
101-10-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Retired Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 116.68 101-10-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Active Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 224.55 Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 341.23
101-10-4150-0000 TIAA Retirement Health Program Annual Fee 2021 01/28/2022 15243 1,500.00 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 1,500.00
101-10-4150-0000 USI Insurance Service National, Inc Group Benefit Fee Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15250 1,250.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 1,250.00
101-10-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 01/14/2022 15162 45.92 101-10-4376-0000 Office Depot Pens 01/14/2022 15162 13.22 Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 59.14
101-10-4376-0000 Prographics Inc Business Cards (1,500)- Various Staff 01/28/2022 0 374.49 Vendor Subtotal for Department:10 374.49
101-11-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 10.20 101-11-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 42.60 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 52.80
101-11-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 288.80 101-11-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 288.80 101-11-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -288.80 101-11-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -288.80 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 0.00
101-11-4150-0000 Colantuono,Highsmith & Whatley, PCSCE Coalition UUT Dec 2021 01/28/2022 15197 64.20 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 64.20
101-11-4150-0000 Lance Soll & Lunghard CPA's LLP FY 2021 Government Audit-Final Payment 01/14/2022 0 5,865.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 5,865.00
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-11-4150-0000 Thales Consulting , Inc State Controller Financial Report FY 21 01/28/2022 15240 1,200.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 1,200.00
101-11-4150-0000 U.S. Bank N.A. - Custody Custody Charges 10/1/21-12/31/21 01/28/2022 15249 574.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 574.50
101-11-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease Jan 2022-2nd Fl City Hall 01/28/2022 15195 287.82 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 287.82
101-11-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Base Charge 1/23/22-2/22/22-2nd Floor City Hall 01/28/2022 0 135.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 135.50
101-11-4500-1980 Southern California Edison Electrical Service Nov-Dec 2021-City Hall 01/14/2022 15170 3,525.06 101-11-4500-1980 Southern California Edison Electrical Service Dec 2021-Jan2022-City Hall01/28/2022 15233 3,744.09 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 7,269.15
101-11-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service Dec 2021-Jan 2022-City Hall 01/28/2022 15241 1,107.85 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 1,107.85
101-11-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Nov-Dec 2021-City Hall 01/14/2022 15140 501.73 101-11-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Dec 2021-Jan 2022-City Hall 01/28/2022 15188 1,237.73 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 1,739.46
101-11-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service 12/11/21-1/10/22-2nd Floor 01/14/2022 15141 293.81 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 293.81
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-11-4500-9460 California American Water Water Service Nov-Dec 2021-City Hall 01/14/2022 15145 106.42 Vendor Subtotal for Department:11 106.42
101-14-3151-0000 Reem Levy Overcharged Credit Payment Permit 22-0001201/14/2022 15136 100.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 100.00
101-14-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium-Jan 2022 01/28/2022 15185 -9.84 101-14-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium-Jan 2022 01/28/2022 15185 9.48 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 -0.36
101-14-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15205 50.74 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 50.74
101-14-4010-0000 Humana Insurance Co Adjustment Premium Jan 2022 01/14/2022 15155 -31.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 -31.00
101-14-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 74.55 101-14-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 28.79 101-14-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 17.85 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 121.19
101-14-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 104.20 101-14-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 104.19 101-14-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -104.20 101-14-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 863.37 101-14-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -104.19 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 863.37
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Plan Check Service 8/29/21-10/2/21 01/14/2022 0 2,152.00 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Over the Counter Plan Check Service 8/29/21-10/2/21 01/14/2022 0 475.00 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Inspection Service 8/29/21-10/2/21 01/14/2022 0 5,103.04 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Plan Check Service 8/29/21-10/2/21 01/14/2022 0 13,530.00 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Permit Technician Service 8/29/21-10/2/21 01/14/2022 0 10,952.50 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Plan Check Service 10/31/21-11/27/21 01/28/2022 0 15,180.00 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Over the Counter Plan Check Service 10/31/21-11/27/21 01/28/2022 0 1,472.50 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Plan Check Service 10/31/21-11/27/21 01/28/2022 0 795.00 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Inspection Service 10/31/21-11/27/21 01/28/2022 0 9,518.42 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 59,178.46
101-14-4106-0950 Dapeer Rosenblit & Litvak LLP Code Enforcement Legal Service Nov 2021 01/14/2022 0 4,840.90 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 4,840.90
101-14-4150-0000 R & C Construction Inc Change Out Water Cartridges - Drinking Water Filling Station 01/14/2022 15165 1,012.22 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 1,012.22
101-14-4150-0001 LC - M News Inc Shop Local Ad PD 11/25/21 01/14/2022 15163 550.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 550.00
101-14-4150-0500 Springbrook Holding Company LLC T&M Services Standard Professional Services - 1 HR 01/28/2022 0 169.00 0000000920 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 169.00
101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Base Rate Charge 12/14/21-1/13/22-CCD01/14/2022 0 53.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 53.50
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-14-4376-0000 Office Depot Paper & Office Supplies 01/14/2022 15162 68.19 101-14-4376-0000 Office Depot Calendars (7) 01/14/2022 15162 116.43 101-14-4376-0000 Office Depot Water 01/28/2022 15227 26.04 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 210.66
101-14-4396-0000 California Association of Code Enforcement Officer Membership-M.Aguilar 01/28/2022 15192 95.00 101-14-4396-0000 California Association of Code Enforcement Officer Membership-V.Aleman 01/28/2022 15192 95.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 190.00
101-14-4412-0000 Alex Hamilton Reimbursement- Certified Mail Postage Notice SMC Project 01/28/2022 15213 108.55 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 108.55
101-14-4420-0000 Alex Hamilton Reimbursement- 12 Set of NOP/IS for SMC Project 01/14/2022 15153 1,406.61 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 1,406.61
101-14-4420-0000 S.A.L Digital Copies, Inc Request for Inspection Forms 01/28/2022 0 220.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 220.50
101-14-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service 12/11/21-1/10/22-CDD 01/14/2022 15141 293.78 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 293.78
101-14-4500-9025 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service - Dec 2021 (Bldg.Inspector) 01/14/2022 15142 20.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 20.00
101-14-4508-0000 Victor Aleman Reimbursement-Fuel for Code Enforcement Car01/28/2022 0 26.86 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 26.86
101-14-4508-0000 WEX Bank Fuel 11/26/21-12/25/21 01/28/2022 15254 34.90 Vendor Subtotal for Department:14 34.90
101-36-4316-0000 HP Communications Inc Satellite Phone Service 3/1/19-2/28/20 01/28/2022 15215 787.87 101-36-4316-0000 HP Communications Inc Satellite Phone Service 3/1/20-2/28/21 01/28/2022 15215 787.87 Vendor Subtotal for Department:36 1,575.74
101-36-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Dec 2021-Jan 2022-EOC 01/28/2022 15188 304.20 Vendor Subtotal for Department:36 304.20
101-36-4500-9025 Time Warner Cable Cable Service 1/8/22-2/7/22-EOC 01/28/2022 15244 81.29 Vendor Subtotal for Department:36 81.29
101-40-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 7.65 101-40-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 31.95 Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 39.60
101-40-4150-0000 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 210.37 101-40-4150-0000 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 58.87 101-40-4150-0000 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 210.37 101-40-4150-0000 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 58.87 101-40-4150-0000 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/28/2022 15184 210.37 101-40-4150-0000 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/28/2022 15184 58.87 Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 807.72
101-40-4150-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease Jan 2022-PW 01/28/2022 15195 322.98 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 322.98
101-40-4376-0000 Prographics Inc City Logo Envelopes 01/28/2022 0 374.49 Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 374.49
101-40-4376-0000 DS Service of America , Inc Drinking Water Service Jan 2022-PW Office 01/28/2022 15238 35.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 35.00
101-40-4492-0003 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 20.52 101-40-4492-0003 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 26.19 101-40-4492-0003 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 26.19 101-40-4492-0003 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 20.52 101-40-4492-0003 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/28/2022 15184 20.52 101-40-4492-0003 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/28/2022 15184 26.19 Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 140.13
101-40-4492-0004 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 16.79 101-40-4492-0004 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 16.79 101-40-4492-0004 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 21.43 101-40-4492-0004 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/14/2022 15139 21.43 101-40-4492-0004 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/28/2022 15184 21.43 101-40-4492-0004 Aramark Cleaning Uniform Service 01/28/2022 15184 16.79 Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 114.66
101-40-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service 12/11/21-1/10/22-PW Admin 01/14/2022 15141 185.55 Vendor Subtotal for Department:40 185.55
101-42-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 5.10 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-42-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 21.30 Vendor Subtotal for Department:42 26.40
101-42-4376-0000 County Sanitation Districts Tire Disposal 01/28/2022 15204 99.80 Vendor Subtotal for Department:42 99.80
101-42-4376-0000 Lawson Products Inc Supplies 01/14/2022 15159 244.95 Vendor Subtotal for Department:42 244.95
101-44-4150-5170 John L Hunter NPDES Consulting Nov 2021 01/14/2022 15156 1,630.00 101-44-4150-5170 John L Hunter NPDES Consulting Dec 2021 01/14/2022 15156 1,371.25 Vendor Subtotal for Department:44 3,001.25
101-44-4150-5170 Richards Watson & Gershon Legal Service Nov 2021 01/14/2022 0 51.50 101-44-4150-5170 Richards Watson & Gershon Legal Service Nov 2021 01/14/2022 0 118.88 Vendor Subtotal for Department:44 170.38
101-44-4150-5170 SWRCB Fees State Water Resource Annual Permit 10/1/21-9/30/22 01/14/2022 15174 10,602.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:44 10,602.00
101-44-4150-9020 Athens Services Street Sweeping Service Dec 2021 01/28/2022 15187 16,173.42 Vendor Subtotal for Department:44 16,173.42
101-48-4010-0000 Humana Insurance Co Adjustment Premium Jan 2022 01/14/2022 15155 7.50 101-48-4010-0000 Humana Insurance Co Adjustment Premium Jan 2022 01/14/2022 15155 23.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 31.00
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-48-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 42.60 101-48-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 10.20 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 52.80
101-48-4150-0000 L.A. Co. Dept of Public Works Signal Maintenance Dec 2021 01/28/2022 15218 230.66 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 230.66
101-48-4150-0000 Siemens Industry Inc Replace New Wiring for Timing Change Huntington/Virginia Rd 01/28/2022 0 3,906.34 101-48-4150-0000 Siemens Industry Inc Replace Light Ped Post Huntington/Granada 01/28/2022 0 893.26 101-48-4150-0000 Siemens Industry Inc Traffic Signal Call Outs Dec 2021 01/28/2022 0 608.94 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 5,408.54
101-48-4376-0000 Crafco Inc Cold Patch Asphalt 01/28/2022 0 662.67 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 662.67
101-48-4376-0000 Ganahl Lumber Company Paint Sign Post Supplies 01/28/2022 15211 88.12 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 88.12
101-48-4376-0000 Grainger Inc Safety Vests & Gloves 01/28/2022 15212 224.33 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 224.33
101-48-4376-0000 Herc Rentals, Inc Light Towers-Lacy Park 01/14/2022 15154 1,089.55 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 1,089.55
101-48-4376-0000 South Coast Lighting Street Light Globes 01/28/2022 15237 881.48 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 881.48
101-48-4376-0000 Traffic Management Incorporated Traffic Signs 01/28/2022 0 998.32 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-48-4376-0000 Traffic Management Incorporated Traffic Signs 01/28/2022 0 690.74 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 1,689.06
101-48-4376-0000 Underground Service Alert/SC Dig Alerts Tickets 01/14/2022 0 117.25 101-48-4376-0000 Underground Service Alert/SC CA State Fee Dig Alerts 01/14/2022 0 45.57 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 162.82
101-48-4376-0000 WCT Products, Inc Underground Pipe and Cable Locator 01/28/2022 15252 3,363.80 0000000998 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 3,363.80
101-48-4500-1980 Southern California Edison Electrical Service Nov-Dec 2021-Streets 01/14/2022 15170 8,696.58 101-48-4500-1980 Southern California Edison Electrical Service Dec 2021-Jan2022-Streets 01/28/2022 15233 7,766.56 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 16,463.14
101-48-4508-0000 All Car Specialists Inc Alignment Truck #5113 01/28/2022 15182 150.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:48 150.00
101-50-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15205 -94.16 Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 -94.16
101-50-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 21.30 101-50-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 5.10 Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 26.40
101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Supplies-Lacy Park 01/14/2022 0 89.21 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Supplies-Lacy Park 01/14/2022 0 73.42 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 01/28/2022 0 30.37 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 01/28/2022 0 183.36 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 376.36
101-50-4376-0000 DS Service of America , Inc Drinking Water Service Jan 2022-Lacy Park Office 01/28/2022 15238 79.99 Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 79.99
101-50-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service Nov-Dec 2021-Lacy Park Office 01/14/2022 15175 59.61 Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 59.61
101-50-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Dec 2021-Jan 2022-Lacy Park 01/28/2022 15188 25.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 25.50
101-50-4500-9025 Time Warner Cable Cable Internet Service 12/25/21-1/24/22-Lacy Park Office 01/28/2022 15244 134.98 Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 134.98
101-50-4500-9460 California American Water Water Service Nov-Dec 2021-Lacy Park 01/14/2022 15145 3,235.89 Vendor Subtotal for Department:50 3,235.89
101-52-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 31.95 101-52-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 7.65 Vendor Subtotal for Department:52 39.60
101-52-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 96.07 101-52-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 96.06 101-52-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -96.06 101-52-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -96.07 Vendor Subtotal for Department:52 0.00
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-52-4150-0000 Mariposa Tree Management Inc Tree Trimming-Dec 2021 01/14/2022 0 2,370.00 101-52-4150-0000 Mariposa Tree Management Inc Emergency Tree Clean Up-1480 Virginia Rd 01/14/2022 0 4,200.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:52 6,570.00
101-52-4500-9460 California American Water Water Service Nov-Dec 2021-Grounds 01/14/2022 15145 7,599.69 101-52-4500-9460 California American Water Water Service Dec 2021-Jan2022-Grounds 01/28/2022 15194 882.15 Vendor Subtotal for Department:52 8,481.84
101-52-4508-0000 All Car Specialists Inc Smog Check 2010 Ford Pickup 01/14/2022 15138 60.00 101-52-4508-0000 All Car Specialists Inc Smog Check 2005 Chevy Silverado 01/28/2022 15182 60.00 101-52-4508-0000 All Car Specialists Inc Smog Check 2006 Ford F450 01/28/2022 15182 60.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:52 180.00
101-53-4150-0000 Beta Security Systems Fire Alarm Service 1/1/22-3/31/22-Stoneman 01/14/2022 15143 285.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 285.00
101-53-4150-0000 Dynamic Building Maintenance Citywide Janitorial Service Dec 2021 01/14/2022 0 6,866.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 6,866.00
101-53-4150-0000 San Marino Security Systems Fire Alarm Service 1/1/2022-3/31/22- Library 01/28/2022 15231 294.00 101-53-4150-0000 San Marino Security Systems Security Alarm Service 1/1/2022-3/31/22- Library 01/28/2022 15231 207.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 501.00
101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Fire Alarm Service -Feb 2022-SMC 01/28/2022 15232 30.00 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service -Feb 2022-Thurnher 01/28/2022 15232 42.00 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service -Feb 2022-City Hall 01/28/2022 15232 75.00 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service -Feb 2022-FD 01/28/2022 15232 87.00 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service -Feb 2022-SMC 01/28/2022 15232 84.00 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 318.00
101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Extermination-Basement City Hall 01/14/2022 0 125.00 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Extermination-Quarterly-City Hall 01/14/2022 0 77.00 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Monthly Extermination-SMC 01/28/2022 0 125.00 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Quarterly Extermination-SMC 01/28/2022 0 78.00 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Monthly Extermination-Library 01/28/2022 0 125.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 530.00
101-53-4206-0000 Control Air Enterprises Inspection for Repair of the Pump- Stoneman 01/28/2022 15199 295.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 295.00
101-53-4206-0000 Plumbing Wholesale Outlet Repair Toilet-Lacy Park Restrooms 01/28/2022 0 73.70 Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 73.70
101-53-4376-0000 Aramsco Inc Janitorial Supplies 01/28/2022 15186 879.36 101-53-4376-0000 Aramsco Inc Restroom Supplies -Library 01/28/2022 15186 162.85 101-53-4376-0000 Aramsco Inc Restroom Supplies -Lacy Park 01/28/2022 15186 1,545.97 Vendor Subtotal for Department:53 2,588.18
101-60-3502-0000 Virginia Lappas Refund-Yoga Winter 01/14/2022 15132 5.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 5.00
101-60-3502-0000 Felisa Rodriguez Refund-Yoga Winter 01/14/2022 15133 5.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 5.00
101-60-3502-0000 Stephanie Gow Refund-Preschool Two's & Three's Jan 2022 01/14/2022 15134 5.00 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 5.00
101-60-3502-0000 Zhan Xu Refund Soccer Parent & Me 01/28/2022 15179 5.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 5.00
101-60-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 10.20 101-60-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 42.60 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 52.80
101-60-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 20.82 101-60-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 20.84 101-60-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -20.82 101-60-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -20.84 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 0.00
101-60-4324-0000 Southwest Mobile Storage Inc Stoneman Storage Bins 1/18/22-2/14/22 01/28/2022 0 177.39 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 177.39
101-60-4376-0000 Office Depot Paper & Calendar 01/28/2022 15227 92.31 101-60-4376-0000 Office Depot Planner 01/28/2022 15227 20.14 101-60-4376-0000 Office Depot Binder, Batteries & Correction Tape 01/28/2022 15227 56.57 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 169.02
101-60-4508-0000 WEX Bank Fuel 11/26/21-12/25/21 01/28/2022 15254 239.03 Vendor Subtotal for Department:60 239.03
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-62-3336-0002 Stephanie Gow Refund-Preschool Two's & Three's Jan 2022 01/14/2022 15134 452.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:62 452.00
101-62-3336-0002 Paulina Han Refund-Preschool Three's & Four's Jan 2022 01/14/2022 15135 398.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:62 398.00
101-62-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 10.65 101-62-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 2.55 Vendor Subtotal for Department:62 13.20
101-62-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 15.64 101-62-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 15.64 101-62-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -15.64 101-62-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -15.64 Vendor Subtotal for Department:62 0.00
101-64-3336-0000 Virginia Lappas Refund-Yoga Winter 01/14/2022 15132 30.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:64 30.00
101-64-3336-0000 Felisa Rodriguez Refund-Yoga Winter 01/14/2022 15133 30.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:64 30.00
101-64-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 26.05 101-64-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 26.04 101-64-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -26.05 101-64-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -26.04 Vendor Subtotal for Department:64 0.00
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-64-4102-0000 William Shuttic Walking Club Coordinator-Dec 2021 01/14/2022 0 250.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:64 250.00
101-64-4486-0000 Tucker Tours, LLC Balance Due-Senior Trip 12/2/21 01/14/2022 15176 1,820.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:64 1,820.00
101-66-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 15.63 101-66-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 15.65 101-66-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -15.65 101-66-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -15.63 Vendor Subtotal for Department:66 0.00
101-66-4376-0000 Dave's Trophies Track Meet Medals 01/14/2022 15150 1,552.32 Vendor Subtotal for Department:66 1,552.32
101-68-3336-0001 Zhan Xu Refund Soccer Parent & Me 01/28/2022 15179 139.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:68 139.00
101-68-3340-0001 Zhan Xu Refund Soccer Parent & Me 01/28/2022 15179 22.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:68 22.00
101-68-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 15.63 101-68-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 15.61 101-68-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -15.63 101-68-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -15.61 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal for Department:68 0.00
101-68-4150-0000 USA Management LLC Pool Contract Payment #3 01/14/2022 15177 1,296.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:68 1,296.00
101-70-4150-0000 DS Service of America , Inc Drinking Water Service Jan 2022-Stoneman 01/28/2022 15238 78.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:70 78.00
101-70-4500-1980 Southern California Edison Electrical Service Nov-Dec 2021-SMC 01/14/2022 15170 356.29 101-70-4500-1980 Southern California Edison Electrical Service Nov-Dec 2021-Stoneman 01/14/2022 15170 1,186.17 Vendor Subtotal for Department:70 1,542.46
101-70-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service Nov-Dec 2021-SMC 01/14/2022 15175 153.09 101-70-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service Nov-Dec 2021-Thurnher 01/14/2022 15175 39.59 101-70-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service Nov-Dec 2021-Stoneman 01/14/2022 15175 32.87 Vendor Subtotal for Department:70 225.55
101-70-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Nov-Dec 2021-Pool 01/14/2022 15140 23.83 101-70-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Nov-Dec 2021-Stoneman 01/14/2022 15140 223.36 101-70-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Dec 2021-Jan 2022-SMC 01/28/2022 15188 246.68 Vendor Subtotal for Department:70 493.87
101-70-4500-9025 Time Warner Cable Cable Internet Service 1/1/22-1/31/22-Stoneman01/28/2022 15244 355.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:70 355.00
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-70-4500-9460 California American Water Water Service Dec 2021-Jan2022-SMC 01/28/2022 15194 273.70 101-70-4500-9460 California American Water Water Service Dec 2021-Jan2022-Stoneman 01/28/2022 15194 178.50 Vendor Subtotal for Department:70 452.20
101-90-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium-Jan 2022 01/28/2022 15185 -17.44 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 -17.44
101-90-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15205 -50.74 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 -50.74
101-90-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 10.20 101-90-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 42.60 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 52.80
101-90-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/07/2022 0 10.43 101-90-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Ins Prem Ded/125 Plan01/21/2022 0 10.41 101-90-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #2 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -10.41 101-90-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Employee Portion Cycle #1 Feb 2022 01/28/2022 0 -10.43 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 0.00
101-90-4150-0000 Advance Pure Water Solutions Water Filtration System Rental Feb 2022-Library01/28/2022 15180 43.80 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 43.80
101-90-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Usages Charge 9/30/21-12/29/21-Library01/14/2022 0 12.65 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 12.65
101-90-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 01/28/2022 15227 49.05 101-90-4376-0000 Office Depot Sorter 01/28/2022 15227 24.74 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-90-4376-0000 Office Depot Keyboard 01/28/2022 15227 22.87 101-90-4376-0000 Office Depot Toners and Labels 01/28/2022 15227 640.84 101-90-4376-0000 Office Depot Mailing Envelopes 01/28/2022 15227 70.07 101-90-4376-0000 Office Depot Wiping Cloth 01/28/2022 15227 19.25 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 826.82
101-90-4398-0000 Mei Breakwell Mileage-Post Office/City Hall Trips 11/30/21-1/7/22- Library 01/28/2022 0 50.34 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 50.34
101-90-4398-0000 Cathi Johnson Reimbursement-Mileage Travel-Workstation/Meeting 11/23/21-12/21/ 01/14/2022 15157 11.42 101-90-4398-0000 Cathi Johnson Reimbursement-Mileage Travel-Workstation/Meeting 9/13/21-11/18/2 01/14/2022 15157 46.42 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 57.84
101-90-4398-0000 Judy Low Mileage Post Office Trips 10/30/21-11/13/21-Library 01/28/2022 15223 2.92 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 2.92
101-90-4398-0000 Kristin Shigenaga Reimbursement-Travel Between Workstation 9/1/21-12/20/21 01/14/2022 15172 34.33 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 34.33
101-90-4398-0000 Chris Wong Mileage-Post Office/City Hall Trips 10/7/21-12/3/21-Library 01/28/2022 15255 18.48 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 18.48
101-90-4500-1980 Southern California Edison Electrical Service Nov-Dec 2021-Library 01/14/2022 15170 5,400.20 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 5,400.20
101-90-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service Nov-Dec 2021-Library 01/14/2022 15175 125.11 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 125.11
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-90-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service Dec 2021-Jan 2022-Library 01/28/2022 15188 160.08 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 160.08
101-90-4500-9025 Time Warner Cable Cable Internet Service 1/2/22-2/1/22-Library 01/28/2022 15244 138.99 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 138.99
101-90-4500-9460 California American Water Water Service Dec 2021-Jan2022-Library 01/28/2022 15194 327.41 Vendor Subtotal for Department:90 327.41
101-91-4370-0335 Brodart Co Books 01/28/2022 15191 97.02 101-91-4370-0335 Brodart Co Books 01/28/2022 15191 231.48 Vendor Subtotal for Department:91 328.50
101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 44.10 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 12.47 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 62.48 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 173.05 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 305.98 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 12.56 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 41.48 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/28/2022 0 190.80 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/28/2022 0 23.74 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/28/2022 0 60.53 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 01/28/2022 0 57.51 Vendor Subtotal for Department:91 984.70
101-91-4370-1985 OverDrive Inc Electronic Resources Jan-Dec 2022 01/28/2022 15229 3,000.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:91 3,000.00
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-91-4370-8585 Matthew Bender & Co Inc Reference Books 01/14/2022 15160 164.72 101-91-4370-8585 Matthew Bender & Co Inc Reference Books 01/28/2022 15224 299.46 Vendor Subtotal for Department:91 464.18
101-91-4370-8585 Thomson Reuters-West Publishing CorpReference Books 01/28/2022 15253 116.08 Vendor Subtotal for Department:91 116.08
101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 497.74 101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 53.44 101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 01/14/2022 0 92.65 Vendor Subtotal for Department:92 643.83
101-93-4150-0000 Brodart Co Cataloging & Processing 01/28/2022 15191 15.80 101-93-4150-0000 Brodart Co Cataloging & Processing 01/28/2022 15191 7.90 Vendor Subtotal for Department:93 23.70
101-94-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion LTD Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 10.65 101-94-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co City Portion Basic Life Payment Feb 2022 01/28/2022 15220 2.55 Vendor Subtotal for Department:94 13.20
Subtotal for Fund: 101 295,632.10
102-00-2010-0000 CA State Disbursement Unit PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Earnings Withholding Order 01/07/2022 0 822.19 102-00-2010-0000 CA State Disbursement Unit PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Earnings Withholding Order 01/21/2022 0 822.19 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 1,644.38
AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)

Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 102-00-2010-0000 State Franchise Tax Board PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Earnings Withholding Order 01/07/2022 15171 250.00 102-00-2010-0000 State Franchise Tax Board PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Earnings Withholding Order 01/21/2022 15235 250.00 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 500.00
102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance Adjustment Premium Jan 2022 01/14/2022 0 276.22 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.12.2021 Disability STD-After Tax 12/10/2021 0 389.64 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.12.2021 Accident Insurance-After Tax 12/10/2021 0 67.98 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.12.2021 Critical Illness 12/10/2021 0 44.60 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.12.2021 Cancer Insurance-After Tax 12/10/2021 0 57.40 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.12.2021 Accident Insurance-Before Tax 12/10/2021 0 226.45 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.12.2021 Life Insurance-After Tax 12/10/2021 0 705.70 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.12.2021 Cancer Insurance-Before Tax 12/10/2021 0 162.97 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.12.2021 Cancer Insurance-After Tax 12/23/2021 0 57.40 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.12.2021 Cancer Insurance-Before Tax 12/23/2021 0 162.97 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.12.2021 Accident Insurance-Before Tax 12/23/2021 0 226.45 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.12.2021 Disability STD-After Tax 12/23/2021 0 389.64 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.12.2021 Critical Illness 12/23/2021 0 44.60 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.12.2021 Life Insurance-After Tax 12/23/2021 0 705.70 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.12.2021 Accident Insurance-After Tax 12/23/2021 0 67.98 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 3,585.70
102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Life Insurance-Transamerica 01/21/2022 15246 97.80 102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Life Insurance-Transamerica 01/07/2022 15246 97.80 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 195.60
102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Deferred Comp-City Manager 01/07/2022 0 76.93 102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Deferred Comp-4% City Manager 01/07/2022 0 336.69 102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Deferred Comp-City Manager 01/21/2022 0 76.93 102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.01.2022 Deferred Comp-4% City Manager 01/21/2022 0 336.69 Vendor Subtotal for Department:00 827.24
102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Deferred Comp 01/07/2022 0 12,182.66 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 01/07/2022 0 542.87 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.01.2022 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 01/07/2022 0 99.02 AP-Transactions by Account (01/27/2022 - 8:11 AM)