San Marino City Council
July 29, 2022

CITY OF SAN MARINO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor www.cityofsanmarino.org
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor (626) 300-0700 Phone
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member (626) 300-0709 Fax Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member City Hall Council Chamber Ken Ude, Council Member 2200 Huntington Drive
Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager San Marino, CA 91108

ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING

OF THE SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
FRIDAY, JULY 29, 2022 AT 8:30 A.M.

SAN MARINO CENTER
1800 HUNTINGTON DRIVE
SAN MARINO, CA 91108
The City of San Marino appreciates your attendance. Citizens’ interest provides the Council with valuable information regarding issues of the community.

Regular meetings are held on the 2nd Wednesday of every month at 6:00 p.m. Typically, adjourned meetings are held on the last Friday of every month at 8:30 a.m.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a reasonable modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk via email at [email protected] or by phone at (626) 300-0705 prior to the meeting for assistance.

PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL (AB) 361
Members of the City Council may teleconference into the meeting without noticing each teleconference location from which a member will be participating in a public meeting.

CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ADVISORY
To protect both staff, our constituents, and elected officials, it is recommended that members of the public wear a mask indoors, per the State and County Health Department’s current Health Officer Orders. Given the seriousness of COVID-19, you are encouraged to provide input electronically if you do not feel comfortable attending in person.

How to participate in the meeting from home:
1) Via Computer for Video Streaming:

Website: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82915024947
Meeting ID: 829 1502 4947
2) Via Phone for Audio Only:

Phone Number: (669) 900-9128
Meeting ID: 829 1502 4947

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – JULY 29, 2022 PAGE 2 OF 5
How to offer public comment from home:
1) Public comment will be accepted by email to [email protected] until 3:00 p.m. the day before the meeting, to be read by the City Clerk during public comment.

Lengthy public comment may be summarized in the interest of time. Any comments received after 3:00 p.m. will be included in the public comment record but will not be read at the meeting.
2) Public comment will be accepted electronically via the zoom.us teleconference module during the meeting. Zoom comments will be taken after the in-person comments.

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Council Member Huang, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Council Member Ude, Vice Mayor Talt, and Mayor Jakubowski

POSTING OF AGENDA
The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each regular meeting at the following locations: City Hall, 2200 Huntington Drive, the Crowell Public Library, 1890 Huntington Drive, and the Stoneman Building, 1560 Pasqualito Drive. The agenda is also posted on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsanmarino.org.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The City welcomes public input. Members of the public may address the City Council by completing a public comment card and giving it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. At this time, the public may address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. Pursuant to state law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on issues not on the meeting agenda (Government Code Section 54954.2). The Mayor reserves the right to place limits on duration of comments. Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READINGS
This action permits the City Council to act on ordinances and resolutions without having to read the entire text of the ordinance or resolution. The title of an ordinance on First Reading must be read in its entirety. An ordinance on Second Reading does not require having the title read.

However, the City Council may request that an ordinance or resolution be read in its entirety before taking any action.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – JULY 29, 2022 PAGE 3 OF 5

NEW BUSINESS

1. AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR SAN MARINO CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT NO. 20-1000 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,820,000 TO CABD CONSTRUCTION INC.; AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
SAN MARINO CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT NO. 20-1000 IN THE AMOUNT OF $350,000 TO GRIFFIN STRUCTURES; APPROVAL OF NATIVE

AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KIZH NATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000;

AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO

APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $617,000; AND APPROVAL TO
APPROPRIATE FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,606,504 FROM THE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND RESERVES FOR THE PROJECT
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council (1) award a construction agreement to CABD Construction, Inc. for the San Marino Center Renovation Project No. 20-1000 in the amount of $5,820,000; (2) award a professional services agreement in the amount of $350,000 to Griffin Structures for professional construction management services; (3) approve a Native American Monitoring Services Agreement with Kizh Nation Resources Management in an amount not to exceed $50,000; 4) authorize the Parks and Public Works Director to approve contract change orders and other contingencies in a cumulative amount not-to-exceed $617,000; and 5) Appropriate $1,606,504 to account 394- 40-4600-1000 (San Marino Center Renovation) from the capital reserves balance.

CONSENT CALENDAR

2. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE RECREATION COMMISSION
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council appoint ____ and ____ as regular members to the Recreation Commission to serve terms ending May 31, 2024, and _____, _____, and _____ as regular members to the Recreation Commission to serve terms ending May 31, 2026.

3. APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF LACY PARK ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 AND NOVEMBER 3, 2022 FOR SAN MARINO HIGH SCHOOL TO

HOST THE RIO HONDO LEAGUE CROSS COUNTRY MEETS
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council authorize the temporary closure of Lacy Park on September 22, 2022, and November 3, 2022, and charge San Marino High School $170 for the Lacy Park permit fees to host the Rio Hondo League cross country meets.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – JULY 29, 2022 PAGE 4 OF 5

4. APPROVAL OF SUPPORT LETTER FOR SENATE BILL 616 (RUBIO) PIQUI’S LAW; KEEPING CHILDREN SAFE FROM FAMILY VIOLENCE
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council approve the support of Senate Bill 616 Piqui’s Law: Keeping children safe from family violence law through a letter to the Chair, The Honorable Mark Stone, Chair, Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

5. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. O-22-1395 (SECOND READING) AMENDING CHAPTER 17.02 OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING

RESTRICTIONS ON PARK RESTROOMS
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council waive full reading and adopt by title only, Ordinance No. O-22-1395 an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Marino Amending Chapter 17.02 of the City Code Regarding Restrictions on Park Restrooms.

6. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. O-22-1396 (SECOND READING) REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. O-20-1362-U PERTAINING TO EVICTIONS Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council waive full reading and adopt by title only, Ordinance No. O-22-1396 an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Marino Repealing Ordinance No. O-20-1362-U Pertaining to Evictions.

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. O-22-1393 (SECOND READING)

AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO MAKE UPDATES TO THE FILM POLICY Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council waive full reading and adopt by title only, Ordinance No. O-22-1393 an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Marino Amending the City Code to make edits to the Film Policy.

CLOSED SESSION

8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
The City Council is meeting with respect to one (1) matter of existing litigation.

Case name: Justin Mi v. City of San Marino
LASC Case No.: 21STCP01830

9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4): 2 matters

10.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Government Code Section 54957.6
City negotiator(s):

Labor Counsel Filarsky
City Manager Marlowe

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – JULY 29, 2022 PAGE 5 OF 5
Employee Organization(s):

San Marino Police Officers’ Association
San Marino Firefighters’ Association
San Marino City Employees’ Association
Unrepresented Employees

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OR PUBLIC WRITINGS DISTRIBUTED
This is an opportunity to announce any written communications pertaining to the City received by members of the City Council. All public writings distributed by the City of San Marino to at least a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the Public Counter at City Hall located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108, and will also be included in the public agenda packet that will available for review at the City Council meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

ADJOURNMENT
Dated: July 21, 2022 CHRISTINA BAKER
Posted: July 21, 2022 CITY CLERK

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
• Engaged and Connected Residents
• Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
• Well-Maintained Infrastructure
• Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government
• Inviting and Relevant City Facilities

BACKGROUND
At the June 8, 2022 City Council meeting, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report for the San Marino Center Renovation Project, approved the project plans and specifications, and authorized the Parks and Public Works Department to advertise for construction bids for the project.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marcella Marlowe, Ph.D., City Manager
BY: Robert Newman, Interim Director of Parks and Public Works/City Engineer Robert Bauman, Management Analyst
DATE: July 29, 2022
SUBJECT: AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR SAN
MARINO CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT NO. 20-1000 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $5,820,000 TO CABD CONSTRUCTION INC.;

AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE SAN
MARINO CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT NO. 20-1000 IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $350,000 TO GRIFFIN
STRUCTURES; APPROVAL OF NATIVE AMERICAN

MONITORING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KIZH NATION

RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$50,000; AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PARKS AND PUBLIC

WORKS DIRECTOR TO APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE

ORDERS AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT
TO EXCEED $617,000; AND APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE
FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,623,613 FROM THE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT FUND RESERVES FOR THE PROJECT
Susan Jakubowski, Mayor
Steve Talt, Vice Mayor
Steven W. Huang, DDS, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Ken Ude, Council Member

In anticipation of the bid advertisement, in October 2021, the Parks and Public Works Department received prequalification proposals for the project from six (6) contractors. The prequalification process enables an agency to determine prior to accepting a bid that the bidding contractors have the contractual experience and financial ability to perform the work.

As part of this process, a questionnaire based on a format approved by the Department of Industrial Relations is completed and the responses are ranked. Contractors that are rated as qualified are then invited to submit a bid after which the lowest of the qualified and responsive bids is recommended to the City Council for an award of contract. Based on review of the aforementioned Department of Industrial Relations questionnaire, six contractors were qualified to submit a bid on the project.

After the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to advertise for bids at the June 8 City Council meeting, these six contractors received the bid documents associated with the project, and two of the six submitted their bids on July 14. (Staff contacted the pre-qualified firms that did not submit bids to gather more information as to why they did not submit bids.

These firms indicated that they are currently very busy with other projects and could not take on the additional work.)
Professional construction management services are recommended so that an experienced construction manager is on site daily to oversee the actual construction to help deliver a successful project. As it pertains to proposals for the construction management services, California Government Code 4526 prescribes selection of architectural and engineering services to be based on demonstrated competence and professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required and does not authorize the selection of professional architectural and engineering services based on cost. City staff was able to reach an agreement with Griffin Structures at a fair and reasonable price.

The City’s existing contracts with Crane Architecture and KSM Architects include construction support. As such, they will work with the team, which includes, City staff, the construction management firm and the construction contractor to ensure construction activities conform with project plans, specifications, historic preservation requirements, and Environmental Impact Report mitigation measures.

DISCUSSION
Solicitation for Construction Bids
On July 14, 2022, a bid opening for the construction portion of the project was held. Two of the City’s prequalified contractors submitted bids, with base bids ranging from $5,820,000 to $7,231,000. CABD Construction Inc. was the lowest bidder and references were checked for satisfactory performance.

A summary of the bids received is shown below, and a summary tabulation of each bidder’s unit prices is attached to this report. The Engineer’s Estimate for the construction portion of this project was $5,344,240.

Bidder Base Bid
CABD Construction, Inc.

Sun Valley, CA $5,820,000
Morillo Construction, Inc.

Pasadena, CA $7,231,000
Engineer’s Estimate $5,344,240
The total recommended construction contract amount is $5,820,000, plus a 10% contract contingency. The requested contingency will cover costs due to unforeseen site conditions and change orders for additional work requested by the City. The total amount for the construction plus the construction contingency is $6,402,000.

Work is planned to commence in September 2022 and scheduled to take 130 working days.

Solicitation for Construction Management Services
A total of six proposals were received for construction management services. Upon careful review of the submitted proposals and interviews of three firms, staff recommends awarding a professional services agreement to Griffin Structures of Irvine. They are appropriate for this project based upon professional qualifications, staff experience, project approach to the scope of work, and adherence to quality and assurance standards. Griffin Structures has extensive experience working on municipal projects, particularly community centers. They additionally have experience working on historic buildings, making them well-suited for this project.

Griffin Structures also understands the importance of information management and is committed to disseminating key information to City staff, the public, and other stakeholders in a timely manner. As such, Griffin Structures will prepare weekly and monthly updates to ensure the City and relevant stakeholders stay informed during the project.

The total recommended construction management services contract amount is $350,000, plus a 10% contract contingency. The requested contingency will cover costs due to unforeseen site conditions and change orders for additional work requested by the City. The total amount for the construction management services plus the contract contingency is $385,000.

Native American Monitoring Services Agreement
Pursuant to the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan that is part of the City Council-approved Environmental Impact Report, the City is required to retain a Native American Monitor prior

to commencement of any ground-disturbing activities. This is to ensure that the construction does not adversely impact any tribal cultural resources, as defined in Public Resources Code section 21074.

Staff has reached out to Kizh Nation Resources Management, and with City Council approval, will enter into a Native American Monitoring Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $50,000. As part of the agreement, and in compliance with the Environmental Impact Report, the Native American Monitor will be present on site during all ground disturbing activities that will occur during project construction (i.e. trenching, excavation for utilities, etc.).

Other Mitigation Services
In November of 2021, a hazardous materials survey of the building was completed by Vista Environmental Consulting. Vista Environmental Consulting identified certain portions of the building that contained hazardous materials (mainly asbestos) that will need to be abated by the construction contractor during project construction, which have been included in the project specifications.

The City has reached an agreement with Vista Environmental Consulting for on-site monitoring during the hazardous materials abatement phase of the project to ensure the hazardous materials abatement specifications are adhered to. The cost of this monitoring is $21,900.

Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
It is estimated that the procurement of furniture, fixtures, and equipment for the renovated facility will cost approximately $604,650. As the lead time for these items is less than the duration of the project construction, the City will work to identify a vendor to provide these items after construction has commenced, and will bring the procurement before the City Council for consideration at a future date. Installation will occur after construction is completed.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
Bids for construction were solicited in accordance with the Public Contract Code and the City’s purchasing ordinance.

Staff estimates that the project’s overall cost will be $8,363,766 (including costs already paid and future costs). In the June 13 agenda packet, the City Council and public were provided with a Project Probable Cost Estimate of $8,336,996 (Attachment 1). This is an increase over the June Probable Cost Estimate of $26,770.

The following table shows the cost changes since that June Estimate; below the table is an explanation of the changes:

Item June
Estimate
Current
Estimate Difference
Total Construction Costs1 $5,344,240 $5,820,000 +$475,760 Construction Contingency (10%)2 $534,430 $582,000 +$47,570 Architectural/Engineering Fees $349,600 $349,600 $0
Architectural Fees (Change Order #1) $18,105 $18,105 $0 Architectural Fees (Change Order #2) $48,700 $48,700 $0 Architectural Fees (Change Order #3) $229,900 $229,900 $0 Historic Preservation Consultant (KSMA) $69,980 $69,980 $0 Plan Check/Permit Fees3 $20,000 $78,500 +$58,500
Furnishings $604,650 $604,650 $0
Construction Management Fees4 $534,420 $385,000 -$149,420 Inspection Fees5 $160,330 $0 -$160,330
EIR Report (ELMT Consulting) $105,431 $105,431 $0
EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program6 $267,210 $0 -$267,210 Tribal Monitoring Program $50,000 $50,000 $0
Hazardous Materials Monitor7 $0 $21,900 +$21,900
Total $8,336,996 $8,363,766 +$26,770

1. The lowest bid came in $475,760 higher than the Probable Cost Estimate.

2. Since the contingency is 10% of the construction cost, this amount went up as the construction cost went up.

3. Revised estimate based on the City’s current fee schedule.

4. The construction management bids came in lower than the Probable Cost Estimate.

5. Inspection will be performed by City staff. No fees apply, as City is inspecting its own building.

6. Staff and consultants under existing contracts are able to perform the Mitigation Monitoring Program.

7. During project design, hazardous materials were identified in the building. As part of the demolition work, they will need to be removed, and a monitor from Vista Environmental will need to be to be on site to ensure they are removed safely.

The adopted FY 2022-23 capital improvement budget includes $6,000,000 for this project in Fund 394 (Capital Projects), which was a placeholder number and not expected to be the actual final cost. Now that we know the final cost, that number can be fine-tuned accurately and will require an appropriation in the amount of $1,623,613 from the Capital Improvement Fund reserves to complete the project, for a total of $7,623,613. (The estimated expenditures to complete the project differs from the overall project cost, as the majority of the architecture/engineering fees have already been paid to consultants.) The Finance Director has reviewed this staff report for compliance with San Marino City Code §02.06.05.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office reviewed and approved this staff report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council award a construction agreement to CABD Construction, Inc., a professional services agreement for construction management services to Griffin Structures, approve a Native American Monitoring Services Agreement with Kizh Nation Resources Management, authorize the Parks and Public Works Director to approve contract change orders and other contingencies in an amount not to exceed $617,000, and appropriate $1,623,613 from the capital reserves balance. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to (1) award a construction agreement to CABD Construction, Inc. for the San Marino Center Renovation Project No. 20-1000 in the amount of $5,820,000; (2) award a professional services agreement in an amount not to exceed $350,000 to Griffin Structures for professional construction management services; (3) approve a Native American Monitoring Services Agreement with Kizh Nation Resources Management in an amount not to exceed $50,000; 4) authorize the Parks and Public Works Director to approve contract change orders and other contingencies in a cumulative amount not-to-exceed $617,000; and 5) Appropriate $1,623,613 to account 394-40-4600-1000 (San Marino Center Renovation) from the capital reserves balance.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Architect’s Probable Cost Estimate, dated June 1 2022

2. Tabulation of all construction bids received

3. Construction bid from CABD Construction

4. Proposal from Griffin Structures

5. Draft Native American Monitoring Services Agreement with Kizh Nation Resources Management

6. Hazardous Materials Survey completed by Vista Environmental Consulting

1 of 1
110 E. WILSHIRE AVE., STE.300  FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92832  714 525-0363 FAX 714 525-9826 E-MAIL: [email protected]  WEB: http://www.cranearchitecturalgrp.com June 1, 2022
Probable Cost Estimate
San Marino Center Remodel – Historic Preservation
(One Story – 11,825 Sq. Ft.)
City of San Marino, Ca.

General Requirements: $ 295,630.00
Demolition $ 158,870.00
Site Construction: $ 459,430.00
Concrete: $ 205,510.00
Masonry: $ 177,440.00
Metals: $ 272,080.00
Wood and Plastics: $ 475,340.00
Thermal & Moisture Protection $ 250,740.00
Doors & Windows: $ 239,400.00
Finishes: $ 374,200.00
Specialties: $ 113,910.00
Equipment (Food Service): $ 149,990.00
Plumbing: $ 481,520.00
Mechanical: $ 458,400.00
Electrical: $ 545,520.00
Fire Alarm System: $ 100,230.00
Fire Sprinkler System: $ 190,160.00

Subtotal: $4,948,370.00

Contractor Overhead/Profit (8%): $ 395,870.00
Total Construction Costs: $5,344,240.00
Contingency (10%): $ 534,430.00
Architectural/Engineering Fees: $ 349,600.00
Architectural Fees (Change Order #1): $ 18,105.00
Architectural/Engineering Fees (Change Order #2): $ 48,700.00 Architectural/Engineering Fees (Change Order #3) $ 229,900.00 Historic Preservation Consultant (KSMA) $ 69,980.00
Plan Check/Permit Fees (Allowance) (Water Dept.): $ 20,000.00 Furnishings (Allowance)*: $ 604,650.00*
Construction Management Fees (10%): $ 534,420.00
Inspection Fees (3%): $ 160,330.00
EIR Report (EMLT Consulting): $ 105,431.00
EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program (5%) $ 267,210.00
Tribal Monitoring (Kizh) Program $ 50,000.00
Total Project Cost: $ 8,336,996.00
* NOTE: This allowance includes the Furnishings, Fixtures, and Equipment costs (tables, chairs, window treatments, audio/visual systems, & other equipment, etc.).

NOTE: Crane Architectural Group has no control over cost of labor, materials, equipment or the contractor's methods of determining cost.

These opinions of probable cost represent our best judgment as design professionals familiar with the construction industry and public works contracts. Crane Architectural Group cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or construction costs will not vary from our opinion of probable construction costs. Opinion of Probable Costs shall not be used as a bid form or for any bidding purposes.

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Name San Marino Center Renovation - Construction Bids
Proj. No. 20-1000
Bid
Opening July 14, 2022
Item Number Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Unit Price Cost Unit Price Cost 1 All Work Associated with Project LS 1 5,344,240.00 5,344,240.00 5,820,000.00 5,820,000.00 7,231,000.00 7,231,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT 5,344,240.00 5,820,000.00 7,231,000.00 Checked by: Robert Bauman
NOTES
Approved by: Robert Newman

CITY OF SAN MARINO

BID TABULATION SUMMARY SHEET
Bidder #1
Name: CABD Construction Inc.

Bidder #2
Engineer's Estimate Name: Morillo Construction
Bid Tabulation Summary Sheet Printed: 7/14/2022

of 246

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

CITY OF SAN MARINO
Construction Management Services for the
San Marino Center Renovation
JUNE 30, 2022

SECTION 1. PROPOSAL SUMMARY
“ G R I F F I N S T R U C T U R E S H E L P E D

M A I N T A I N A P O S I T I V E R E L A T I O N S H I P

B E T W E E N T H E C I T Y A N D C O N T R A C T O R ,

W H I L E U T I L I Z I N G A S T R O N G

B A C K G R O U N D I N I N S P E C T I O N T O

D E L I V E R Y T H I S F A I R L Y C O M P L E X

P R O J E C T S U C C E S S F U L L Y T H A T T H E

C O M M U N I T Y C A N E N J O Y F O R Y E A R S
T O C O M E . I T W A S A P L E A S U R E
WORKING WITH THE ENTIRE TEAM.”
- THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Project
San Marino Center Renovation
Date of Submittal
June 30, 2022
Proposed Construction Manager
Cody Roth, ICC
Proposal Contact
Jon Hughes
Principal-In-Charge & Executive Vice President of Operations P: (949) 444-1615
[email protected]
Principal Place of Business
Griffin Structures
1 Technology Drive, Building i, Suite 829
Irvine, CA 92618

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES City of San Marino
2200 Huntington Drive
San Marino, CA 91108
Dear Mr. Newman and Evaluation Team,
As Griffin Structures celebrates 41 years of providing award-winning Project and Construction Management services, we are pleased to submit our proposal to the City of San Marino for the San Marino Center Renovation Project. As you will discover within our proposal, our team is uniquely qualified to deliver this project given our extensive community center and historical/ renovation portfolio, deep local public sector roots, and wealth of internal resources inclusive of Field/Building Inspectors and Construction Managers versed in historical renovations and public outreach advocates.

We understand the value associated with maintaining the historical character of the San Marino Center, as well as the particular sensitivities which will call for special oversight from the project team to ensure the project is delivered seamlessly while protecting of the City’s investment. Similarly, our community center portfolio is unmatched , with direct experience working with Crane Architectural Group on a similar project for the City of Buena Park. We know and understand the value community facilities hold, the design intent behind them, and best construction methodologies to deliver them successfully. To offer the highest value to the City, we also offer a team which has well acquainted themselves with this project, and found within the following pages of our proposal, we have offered several key strategic considerations for your review. This is but a mere testament to the insight, level of analysis, investment, and oversight our team provides to ensure the successful completion of this project.

As an extension of our public clients, we also understand the particular sensitivities associated with construction adjacent to residential neighborhoods, commercial businesses, and most importantly, K-12 educational institutions and public facilities. A project is only as successful as it is perceived by the community and we will offer community-centered approaches to mitigate construction impacts, enforcement of established safety measures, and offer public advocacy to ensure stakeholder buy-in from all members of the community.

Your team will be led by Cody Roth, a Construction Manager with a formal background as a Field/Building Inspector, who served on the high-profile $58M Santa Clarita Canyon Country Community Center, as well as the dynamic reshaping of the City of Laguna Beach’s Village Entrance project, which included careful management of several historic sensitivities to the community and supported by public outreach advocate, Susan Harden. All members of our leadership team, inclusive of Roger Torriero, Jon Hughes, and Robert Godfrey, have also completed many of the most cherished community center projects in the state, including many in the LA Basin.
1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, BUILDING I, SUITE 829 | IRVINE, CA | 949 497 9000 | GRIFFINSTRUCTURES.COM Transmittal Letter

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES TO SUMMARIZE, WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING KEY BENEFITS:

Unparalleled, local, and relevant community center and historical renovation experience.

A team led by a seasoned Field/Building Inspector, who has served as both a Construction Manager for several community projects with historical buildings, trained by the International Code Council.

A comprehensive team of experts to best capture the requested Scope of Work, managed with the unique perspective of a development firm for high-profile public projects valued in excess of $2B.

A collaborative, streamlined delivery process to ultimately reduce City administrative costs and ensure timely delivery.

Griffin Structures takes great pride in providing competitive pricing and highly qualified personnel and goes to great measures to ask, “What is our true value-added proposition to the City of San Marino?”. The answer to this question is our people. We bring a higher caliber of Construction Manager to our clients - one that is trained as an architect and builder but thinks like an owner. Our people offer creative delivery options, solutionsbased recommendations, and a true perspective of ownership that our competitors do not possess. This is our differentiator and the meaning behind the Griffin Structures pledge to provide Excellence in Project Delivery.

We hereby acknowledge the receipt of all addenda. Griffin Structures is a California S-Corporation and this letter has been signed by the person(s) authorized to obligate the Construction Manager contractually.

We look forward to serving you,
Jon Hughes
Principal-In-Charge
Executive VP of Operations
(949) 444-1615
[email protected]
Kelly Boyle
Secretary & Executive VP
of Project Development
(949) 324-8880
[email protected]
1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, BUILDING I, SUITE 829 | IRVINE, CA | 949 497 9000 | GRIFFINSTRUCTURES.COM

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Q: What is a client's greatest concern when it comes to ensuring a successful renovation?
A: Controlling cost and mitigating the impact of unforeseen conditions is a primary concern in the midst of a renovation project particularly when dealing with a historic building.

We firmly believe that change is the ultimate adversary to a cost-efficient project. To mitigate and minimize the impact of change, we strictly monitor all RFI responses, submittal markups, field issues, and maintain a rigorous accounting procedure that tracks all change conditions, including but not limited to; potential changes (those we have identified but for which have not received a formal change order request), submitted change order requests (COR), rejected CORs, approved CORs, monthly contract change orders, contingency usage, the issue related to each change, the parties involved, and any other necessary documentation. When a COR is recommended for
approval, it will be accompanied by all relevant documentation to be reviewed and understood in its entirety without requiring intimate knowledge of the project. We also work to minimize impacts by seeking cost effective solutions with the City, designers, and the Contractor.

Difficulties & Proposed Solutions
We go to great lengths to research and understand the challenges and opportunities for every pursuit. As a result of this effort, we have prepared the following strategic considerations to demonstrate our approach and illustrate the value we offer.

Q: What particular challenges are associated with historical renovations? A: Renovations present the challenge of the unknowns particularly when as-built data is incomplete or unreliable. This is compounded when a building is historic or has historic value. Griffin Structures possesses the necessary experience to identify and overcome these circumstances given our extensive portfolio inclusive of historical renovation projects, both internationally and within the state of California. We will be well versed in the drawings, specifications, and procedures and insure the contractor is adhering to all. We will give special attention to pre-construction meeting and any necessary exploration prior to demolition. We will work closely with all consultants making sure concerns are raised early and addressed in a timely manner.

We will oversee the Contractor’s Quality Assurance efforts in the storage, protection, treatment, and restoration of historic elements, materials and site conditions, removal and dismantling of equipment, salvaged elements, application of chemicals, use of heat-generated equipment, and final cleaning processes.

Additionally, we will work closely with the Contractor to identify or locate all existing underground utilities, potential abandoned lines or structures that may exist. Though the plans place the responsibility on the Contractor to locate and mitigate these potential unknown items, change orders may be required when the extent of the additionally required work is determined. The City may consider a contingency bid item, or initiate “potholing” prior to construction to avoid additional costs and potential delays to the project schedule. Should the City wish to pursue this approach, Griffin Structures is prepared to oversee and facilitate this effort as well as support the Design Team in the inclusion of this information into the plans and specifications.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Q: What are the challenges associated with protecting and or relocating existing trees?
A: There are several complexities as it pertains to relocating and preserving existing trees. For starters, tree root systems may pose potential conflicts with proposed utility improvements. Secondly, transplanting trees is a risky endeavor requiring a specialty landscaper and arborist involvement. Griffin has managed tree relocations in the past and will apply the knowledge learned to the City’s project. We have reviewed the Risk Assessment and Tree Protection Plan conducted by Carlberg Associates and will enforce the Protection Plan to ensure the removal, preservation, and transplanting of trees is conducted in a well-executed manner consistent with the outlined specifications determined by the City and its Tree Risk Assessment consultant.

Q: How do we reduce impacts to Huntington Middle
School, the City's library & the surrounding community? A: Given the San Marino Center’s proximity to Huntington Middle School, Crowell Public Library, San Marino Unified School District offices, and the surrounding neighborhood, communication will be key throughout the construction process. Griffin Structures will establish a communication plan including but not limited to having a monitored voicemail for questions and concerns which will be responded to within 48 hours, issuing weekly schedule updates to advise of deliveries or other heavy construction traffic, and establishing a direct line of communication with the principal, the librarians, and key school district staff. Our goal is to have the adjacent stakeholders become advocates for this project’s success.

Additionally, this project includes demolition and removal of large trees, potentially hazardous materials abatement, demolition, and transport, buildings, which will take time to accomplish. Although impacts to the surrounding neighborhood is somewhat inevitable, we can offer successful strategies to mitigate errant noise and fugitive dust, as well as implement traffic controls and ensure public safety.

CONFIDENTIAL
California Civil Code § 3426.1 (d); California Evidence Code section 1040 and 1060; California Government Code section 6254(k); Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)

D O N O T R E L E A S E W I T H O U T G R I F F I N
STRUCTURES’ CONSENT & REDACTIONS
WHY GRIFFIN?
4 0 + Y E A R S

O F L O C A L

P U B L I C S E C T O R

EXPERIENCE

E X T E N S I V E

E X P E R I E N C E

W I T H H I S T O R I C A L

FACILITIES

U N P A R A L L E L E D

C O M M U N I T Y C T R
+ RENOVATION

POR T FOLIO

C M T R A I N E D

A S B O T H A N

I N S P E C T O R &

OWNER'S REP
" P U B L I C R E L A T I O N S
M I N D E D " R E :

C O M M U N I T Y

I N T E R A C T I O N S &
SAFETY
Table of
Contents
Section 1. Proposal Summary 1
Section 2. Financial & Related Information 38
Section 3. Response Forms 41

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES 1 Exhibit G

PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION CHECKLIST
All forms are to be completed and any materials submitted with the proposal pursuant to Section 5.1.1 of the RFP.

SECTION 1 Proposal Summary
 Title Page
 Transmittal Letter
 Table of Contents
 Proposal Organization Checklist, Exhibit G
 Executive Summary
 Construction Manager Qualifications and Experience
 Client References
 Subconsultants
 Proposed Approach
 Performance Criteria
SECTION 2 Financial and Related Information
 Financial and Related Information
 Claims and Litigation History
 Letter from Insurance Broker
SECTION 3 Response Forms
 Proposal Authorization, Exhibit H
 Acknowledgment of Addendum Form(s), Exhibit I
 Acceptance of Form of Professional Services Agreement, including any proposed modifications, Exhibit E
SECTION 4 Discretionary Supplemental Materials
 Explanation of relevancy of discretional supplementary materials  Supplementary materials
 Cost Proposal (Submitted Separately)
We have included all pertinent information within the contents of sections one through three.

This information is included within Susan Harden's resume.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Excellence in Project Delivery
Griffin Structures is a diversified Program, Project, and Construction Management/Owners Representative firm serving public, non-profit, private, and institutional sectors. Our mission is to deliver unparalleled service that not only unlocks revolutionary discoveries but allows clients to achieve their immediate and future goals to enrich the lives of the people they serve.

A unique aspect of our firm is our extensive and local experience with community centers, including historical renovations.

Throughout the 300+ projects we have completed in California, we have also worked with Crane Architectural Group for the Buena Park Community Center, which included the reuse of a former police headquarters, involving retrofitting of the existing bomb shelter and the construction of above-grade significant facility improvements.

Management of multiple projects simultaneously for building programs valued in excess of $1.5B.

A proposed Construction Manager with hands-on experience in the field as a Building Inspector, with several certifications from the International Code Council.

Constructability review and recommendations, scheduling, site management plans and keen insight into critical construction activities and design considerations.

Significant experience with extensive historical and non-historical renovations, ranging from former military sites, brownfields, significant seismic and structural upgrades, and renovation of 1,000+ year old buildings.

Proactive engagement with all consultant types, from Architects, Contractors, Historical Conformance Specialists, Arborists, Environmental Consultants, Labor Compliance Monitors, Inspection/Testing Agencies, Commissioning Agents, and others.

Outreach with communities directly impacted by construction, including City facilities and related users, K-12 education institutions, neighborhoods, with a keen ability to “Think not only as a Designer and Builder” but as an extension of the Owner and member of the community.
+
+
+
+
+
We Also Offer
+

BURLINGAME COMMUNITY CENTERS A N T A C L A R I T A C A N Y O N C O U N T R Y Y O R B A L I N D A L I B R A R Y & C U L T U R A L COMMUNITY CENTER ARTS CENTER

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES N E W P O R T B E A C H M A R I N A P A R K COMMUNITY & SAILING CENTER Community Centers

S A N T A C L A R I T A C A N Y O N C O U N T R Y COMMUNITY CENTER Lillian Court & Bloomington Grove Community Center & Library Santa Clarita Canyon Country Community Center
Burlingame Community Center & Washington Park
Irvine Quail Hill Community Center
Lake Forest Sports Park & Recreation Center
Newport Beach Marina Park Community & Sailing Center
Vernola Park Expansion & Community Center
Laguna Beach Community & Susi-Q Senior/Community Center Carlsbad Pine Avenue Community Center & Gardens
Salinas Hebbron Family Center Revitalization
Yorba Linda Library & Cultural Arts Center
Fullerton Multigenerational Community Center
Santa Ana Delhi Community Center
Buena Park Community Center
Lawndale Community Center
San Dimas Community Center Expansion
Huntington Beach Senior/Community Center
San Bruno Recreation, Aquatics Center & Community Facilities The Trust for Public Land (TPL) Parks & Community Facilities Piedmont Aquatic Center & Community Facilities
South Gate Urban Orchard & Community Facilities
Mountain View Aquatic Ctr & Community Facilities
Esencia Sports Park & Community Facilities
Seal Beach Aquatics/Community Facilities Programming
Rancho Santa Margarita Civic Plaza & Community Center
Rancho Palos Verdes, Ladera Linda Community Center & Park Rancho Cucamonga Sports Center & Community Facilities
Cypress Community Center Renovation / Expansion
Indio Terra Lago Community Recreation Center
West Hollywood Plummer Park Community Center
Aliso Viejo Boys/Girls Club & Community Facilities
San Juan Capistrano Boys/Girls Club & Community Facilities Covina Community Center Programming
Lake Forest Community Center Programming
Newport Beach Westside Community Center Programming
Rancho Palos Verdes Civic & Community Center
Rancho Santa Margarita Community Center
Discovery Cube Science Center & Community Facilities
Half Moon Bay Library & Community Facilities
Northeast Stockton Library & Community Center
Quartz Hill Library & Community Facilities
Salinas El Gabilan Branch Library & Community Facilities Santa Cruz Downtown Library & Community Facilities
Tustin Main Library & Community Facilities
Watsonville Civic Plaza & Community Facilities

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

1. Billingsgate Market, London (HIST O RIC AL )

2. Downtown Women's Center (HIST O RIC AL )

3. Pomona Water Resources HQ & Yard (HIST O RIC AL )

4. Langham Hotel, London (HIST O RIC AL )

5. Castiglion del Bosco, Tuscany (HIST O RIC AL )

6. Orange County Marshal's Department (HIST O RIC AL )

7. Laguna Beach Village Entrance & Historical Bldg (HIST O RIC AL )

8. Hotel Casa Del Mar, Santa Monica (HIST O RIC AL )

9. Los Angeles Central Library (HIST O RIC AL )

10. Port Theater, Corona Del Mar (HIST O RIC AL )

11. 845 S. Figueroa Office Building, Los Angeles (HIST O RIC AL )

12. 832 Francisco Office Building, Los Angeles (HIST O RIC AL )

13. Olympix Fitness, Long Beach (HIST O RIC AL )

14. Piazza Del Sol, West Hollywood (HIST O RIC AL )

15. Long Beach Community Hospital (HIST O RIC AL )

16. San Dimas Community Center Expansion

17. Cypress Community Center Renovation / Expansion

18. Buena Park Community Center Renovation
(HIST O RIC ALLY SENSITIVE)

19. Rancho Palos Verdes Ladera Linda Community Center & Park

20. Hesperia City Library

21. La Canada Flintridge City Hall Renovation
Renovations
Griffin Structures has completed over 70 renovations and upgrades to existing public facilities. This project type provides incredible opportunities to enhance your facilities, address space needs, accessibility, or remove, repurpose or preserve, artifact products or materials. Many considerations do exist for this project type, and our team will dedicate significant time and resources toward managing the detection of all existing conditions, overhead concealed work, underground site conditions, and all potential renovation conditions to avoid unforeseen circumstances and avoid impacts to budget or schedule. 8 7
4 11
5 1 2
7

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Describe how your team will be organized to perform this project.

As you will see below and within the resumes of our proposed team members, we possess the requisite Construction Management expertise required, having managed the delivery of over 100 community, senior centers, and community-focused facilities. Our team includes:

Construction Manager, trained field/building inspector, and key project contact, Cody Roth, who led the recent successful completion of the $58M Santa Clarita Canyon Country Community Center, supported by a seasoned leadership team comprised of;
Roger Torriero, President and CEO, who has managed the high-profile, historical renovation of the 1,000+ year old Castiglion del Bosco resort, several municipal historical renovation/transformations, and over 30 community centers, including; Principal-In-Charge and Executive Vice President of Operations, Jon Hughes, who served as the primary Project and Construction Manager (PMCM) for the iconic Newport Beach Marina Park Community & Sailing Center, including countless renovated community facilities, with;
Robert Godfrey, Project Executive and former PMCM for the historically sensitive and renovated Downtown Women's Center in Los Angeles, as well as highly sustainable community centers for the cities of Lawndale, Irvine, and several others.

Susan Harden, Construction Site Public Relations Specialist, who will support our in-house neighborhood communication efforts with services available for City-branded pop-up events, social media posts, website updates, press releases, newsletters, and additional communications material to support the City's endeavor to ensure community buy-in and stakeholder support.

CIRCLEPOINT
Susan Harden
Outreach Advocate
Roger Torriero
President & CEO
Jon Hughes, CCM, DBIA
Principal-In-Charge

KEY CONTACT
Robert Godfrey, CCM
Project Executive
Cody Roth, ICC
Construction Manager
Team Organization

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

ROGER TORRIERO

PRESIDENT & CEO
Years of Experience: 41
Education: Master of Architecture, Accademia di Belle Arti di Firenze, Italia, Bachelor of Architecture, Syracuse University, New York Certificates/Licenses: California Contractor License,. #793600, Class B Roger has led the pre-design, design, and construction for all Griffin projects, including real estate development, finance, design, and construction. Roger provides specialized expertise in the realization of challenging projects as an expert in forward planning, finance, entitlements, project delivery methodologies, and community-based participatory planning.

As President and CEO, Roger will provide invaluable
insight to the project team, ensuring your expectations are met throughout the duration of our services.

Representative Experience:

1. Santa Clarita Canyon Country
Community Center, CA

2. Burlingame Community Center &
Washington Park, CA

3. Irvine Quail Hill Community Center, CA

4. Yorba Linda Library & Cultural Arts
Center, CA

5. Fullerton Multigenerational Community
Center, CA

6. Lake Forest Sports Park & Recreation
Center, CA

7. Newport Beach Marina Park Community
& Sailing Center, CA

8. Laguna Beach Village Entrance &^
Historical Building, CA

9. Laguna Beach Community & Susi-Q
Senior/Community Center, CA

10. Carlsbad Pine Avenue Community Center
& Gardens, CA

11. Vernola Park Expansion & Community
Center, CA

12. Salinas Hebbron Family Center
Revitalization, CA

13. Santa Ana Delhi Community Center, CA

14. Buena Park Community Center, CA

15. Lawndale Community Center, CA

16. San Dimas Community Ctr Expansion, CA
2 6 9
Major Strengths:

1. 40+ years of experience with community
centers and historical renovations.

2. High-profile P3/developer portfolio
serving on projects valued in excess of
$1B publicly funded dollars.

3. Formally trained in architecture.

4. "Concept to keys" leadership managing
all project team members from inception
to completion. * Roger has worked for Griffin Structures in excess of ten years.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Years of Experience: 28
Education: B.S., Westmont College
Certificates/Licenses: Certified Construction Mgr. (CCM); Design-Build Inst. of America Assoc. (DBIA) ; CA Contractor License 793600, Class A Jon Hughes leads the day-to-day management of our project team to ensuring our client’s needs are met throughout the duration of our services, offering leadership in pre-construction, bid and contract review, safety, site evaluation, quality and cost controls, change order review, schedule review and enforcement, site staging, off-sites and grading, inter-contractor coordination, punch list, and turnover.

As the Principal-In-Charge, Jon will provide oversight
and support to Robert Godfrey, Cody Roth, and all
members of our proposed team.

Representative Experience:

1. Santa Clarita Canyon Country
Community Center, CA

2. Burlingame Community Center &
Washington Park, CA

3. Irvine Quail Hill Community Center, CA

4. Yorba Linda Library & Cultural Arts
Center, CA

5. Fullerton Multigenerational Community
Center, CA

6. Lake Forest Sports Park & Recreation
Center, CA

7. Newport Beach Marina Park Community
& Sailing Center, CA

8. Laguna Beach Village Entrance &^
Historical Building, CA

9. Laguna Beach Community & Susi-Q
Senior/Community Center, CA

10. Carlsbad Pine Avenue Community Center
& Gardens, CA

11. Vernola Park Expansion & Community
Center, CA

12. Salinas Hebbron Family Center
Revitalization, CA

13. Santa Ana Delhi Community Center, CA

14. Buena Park Community Center, CA

15. Lawndale Community Center, CA

16. San Dimas Community Ctr Expansion, CA
7 10 4

JON HUGHES , CCM, DBIA

PRINCIPAL-IN- CHARGE
Major Strengths:

1. Demonstrated CM leadership pertaining
to community centers and public
facilities.

2. Strong background as a Project
Superintendent with an in-depth
understanding of the building process
and Contractor methodologies.

3. Certified Construction Manager and
accredited Design-Build Institute of
America Associate * Jon has worked for Griffin Structures in excess of ten years.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

ROBERT GODFREY , CCM

PROJECT EXECUTIVE
Years of Experience: 21
Education: Bachelor of Science, Management, The Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
Certificates/Licenses: Certified Construction Manager (CCM) Robert is involved during all phases of development and construction.

His responsibilities entail management from pre-con to closeout with a record of effective communication with all team members, offering recommendations for significant time and cost savings, coordinating consultants, vendors and contractors - all to ensure the client’s goals and objectives are achieved.

As Project Executive, Robert will provide oversight and support to Cody Roth and team.

Representative Experience:

1. Santa Clarita Canyon Country
Community Center, CA

2. Irvine Quail Hill Community Center, CA

3. Rancho Palos Verdes, Ladera Linda
Community Center & Park, CA

4. Downtown Women's Ctr, Los Angeles, CA

5. Jurupa Area Recreation & Park District,
Vernola Park Expansion & Community
Center, CA

6. Rancho Palos Verdes Civic Center &
Community Center, CA

7. Lawndale Community Center, CA

8. West Hollywood City Hall Renovation, CA

9. La Cañada Flintridge Civic Center
Renovation, CA

10. Rancho Cucamonga Sports Center, CA

11. LINC Housing, HiFi Collective, Los
Angeles, CA

12. MidPen Shirley Chisolm Educator
Housing, San Francisco, CA

13. Jordan Downs Housing Development,
Los Angeles. CA

14. The Trust for Public Land 14+ Park
Projects, CA
Madison Ave, Bicentennial, Serenity, and
11+ additional parks/community facilities
2 4 7
Major Strengths:

1. Extensive experience with community
centers and historical renovations.

2. Stellar reputation of client service,
partnering personality, and public
relations mindset.

3. Certified Construction Manager with
a strong background as a building
Contractor.
* Jon has worked for Griffin Structures in excess of ten years.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Years of Experience: 13
Education: Santa Ana & Rio Hondo College, Building Inspection Certificates/Licenses: International Code Council B-1 Building, E-1 Electrical; P-1 Plumbing; CAL OES Safety Program (ID#77558) Cody Roth has a wealth of experience in community-focused projects, both as a Program/Construction Manager, and as a Field/Building Inspector for multiple agencies throughout his career. His project background also includes horizontal infrastructure projects as well as vertical construction including municipal, commercial, medical, and residential new construction and/or renovation.

As Construction Manager, Cody will be responsible for
the day-to-day management of the project.

Representative Experience:

1. Santa Clarita Canyon Country
Community Center, CA

2. Esencia Sports Park & Community
Facilities, Rancho Mission Viejo Co., CA

3. Laguna Beach Village Entrance &^
Historical Building, CA

4. LANLT, Wishing Tree Park, Tustin, CA

5. Laguna Beach Animal Shelter, CA

6. City of Tustin Senior Building Inspector*
Greenwood by Cal Atlantic & Brookfield
The Village at Tustin Legacy Shopping
Center (16 buildings, 22-acre project that
included multiple construction types)
Tustin Council Chambers Renovation
County of Orange Library Restoration
Hoag 3-Story Medical Office
Wagly Pet Campus
Multiple Type-5 Shell Buildings for
tenants such as Del Taco, Sephora, Bank
of America, Dunkin’ Donuts, etc
Various infrastructure inspections

7. City of Vista Building Inspector*
Serra by Shear Homes
Avalon Apartments (12 Buildings)
Belching Beaver Brewery Tavern & Grill
1 3 2

CODY ROTH , ICC

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Major Strengths:

1. Field / Building Inspection Certified.

2. Direct experience with community
centers and historical renovations.

3. Stellar reputation of client service,
partnering personality, and public
relations mindset.
* Cody has worked for Griffin Structures in excess of four years. Prior to that, he worded for Interwest Consultants as a Building Inspector.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Years of Experience: 27
Education: Master of Environmental Planning, Arizona State University; Bachelor of Architectural & Environmental Studies, Univ. of Kansas Certificates/Licenses: American Institute of Certified Planners; Certified Main Street Manager; Professional Certificate in Neighborhood Revitalization, NeighborWorks America; Certificate in Dialogue, Deliberation and Public Engagement; LEED Accredited Professional; Congress for the New Urbanism, CNU-A
Susan Harden has a broad background in community development, engagement, and planning. She has built her career around community-based planning, striving to create healthier, more livable communities. Susan is the co-author of “Placemaking on a Budget”, a handbook for community members to enhance sense of place. She is a member of the Advisory Board for the Dept of Planning & Public Policy at UCI where she teaches a graduate public participation course. A leader in public outreach, Susan will serve to ensure stakeholder buy-in and support throughout the duration of construction.

Representative Experience:

1. Communications & Graphic Design, Long
Beach Water, Long Beach, CA

2. Cupertino Library Expansion, CA*

3. Santa Cruz Community Center & Library,
CA

4. Yorba Linda Library & Cultural Arts
Center, CA*

5. Laguna Beach Village Entrance, CA*

6. Shoreline Park Master Plan - Monarch
Bay Shoreline Development Project, San
Leandro, CA*

7. Eastvale Civic Center (City Hall, Library,
Senior & Community Center, Police
Station, Fire Station)*

8. Buena Park Fire Station No.61, CA*

9. Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
Update, CA

10. Channel Islands Harbor Vision Plan, CA

11. Campo Road Corridor Revitalization Plan,
CA

12. Wildomar Town Center Master Plan, CA

13. Vista Civic Center Master Plan, CA

14. Poway Town Center Master Plan, CA

15. North Downtown Area Neighborhood
Vision Plan, Lancaster, CA

16. Imperial Downtown Master Plan, CA

17. Riverside Innovation District Vision Plan,
CA

SUSAN HARDEN , FAICP, CNU-A, LEED AP

OUTREACH ADVOCATE

CUPERTINO LIBRARY

EXPANSION PROJECT

FACT SHEET
Project Description
The City of Cupertino has had its eye on
expanding the Cupertino Library since 2012.

That dream will finally be realized this year as
the one-story, southern portion of the library
is replaced with an approximately 5,600 sf
two-story addition. The first and second floors
of the expansion feature large multi-purpose
rooms that will be used for library programs
for all ages, spill-over study spaces, and other
community uses. The much needed additional
space will allow the library to fulfill its mission
of encouraging life-long learning and selfimprovement. A design-build approach is being used to undertake this expansion.

Design-build is a project delivery method that
allows for the overlapping of the design phase
and construction phase. When done well, it
minimizes legal risk, reduces costs, and shortens
the delivery schedule of the project.

View of the southeast facade (EHDD)
cupertino.org/libraryexpansion
Funding
The Cupertino City Council unanimously
approved the project with $8 million in funding.

The facility will be owned and maintained by
the City of Cupertino. The Cupertino Library is a
member of the Santa Clara County Library District,
with services provided by the Library District.

The Library Expansion project is an
exciting addition to the Civic Center that
will enhance the library’s ability to meet
the current and future needs of Cupertino
residents. The Cupertino Library has
enjoyed a level of success unmatched
with any library inthe Santa Clara County
Library District system with more than two
million items checked out annually. Over
900,000 people visited the library between
July 2018 and June 2019 with that number
expected to hit a million in future years.
5 to 5:15 p.m.
5:15 to 5:30 p.m.
5:30 to 6:15 p.m.
6:15 to 8 p.m.

Gather in the Courtyard
Ribbon Cutting
Ceremonial Remarks
New Community Room (first floor)
Reception
Hors d’oeuvres and drinks by:

Pineapple Thai
Live music by:

Kira Bayer, Violin
Milo Klise, Cello
Jesse Distiller, Piano
Thank you for attending!
Friday, April 29, 2022
Major Strengths:

1. Certified in planning, neighborhood
revitalization, dialogue, deliberation,
public engagement, and LEED design.

2. True perspective as both a community
member, extension of the client, and
member of the project team.

3. Extensive and demonstrated partnering
history with Griffin Structures.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES CODY ROTH , ICC | CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
City of Santa Clarita
Damon Letz
City Engineer
(661) 510-0280
[email protected]
Project: Santa Clarita Canyon Country
Community Center
Tom Perez
Current Project Dir., Laguna Beach
Former CIP Manager, Irvine
(949) 464-6688
[email protected]
Project: Laguna Beach Village Entrance &
Historical Building
Matt Oxford
City of Laguna Beach
Project Manager
(949) 613-4045
[email protected]
Project: Laguna Beach Village Entrance &
Historical Building
ROBERT GODFREY , CCM | PROJECT EXECUTIVE
Tom Perez
Current Project Dir., Laguna Beach
Former CIP Manager, Irvine
(949) 464-6688
[email protected]
Project: Irvine Quail Hill Community Center
Jeff Benson
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Management Analyst II
(909) 774-4137
[email protected]
Project: Rancho Cucamonga Sports Center
The Trust for Public Land
Robin Mark
Program Manager
(310) 770-6499
[email protected]
Project: 14+ The Trust for Public Land Park
& Community Facilities Projects
JON HUGHES , CCM, DBIA | PRINCIPAL-IN- CHARGE
Iris Lee, PE
Dep. Public Works Dir., Seal Beach
Former Newport Beach PM
(714) 328-9760
[email protected]
Project: Newport Beach Marina Park
Community & Sailing Center
County of San Bernardino
Terry W. Thompson
Real Estate Services Department
(909) 387-5104
[email protected]
Project: San Bernardino County, Multiple
Projects
City of Newport Beach
David Webb
Public Works Director
(949) 644-3330
[email protected]
Project: Newport Beach Marina Park
Community & Sailing Center
ROGER TORRIERO | PRESIDENT & CEO
James Vanderpool
City Manager, Anaheim
Former City Manager, Buena Park
(714) 562-3550
[email protected]
Project: Buena Park Fire Station,
Community Center & Police Headquarters
City of Half Moon Bay
John Doughty
Public Works Dir. / Assist. City Mgr.
(650) 712-6660
[email protected]
Project: Half Moon Bay Library & Carter
Park Renovation
Bill Foltz
CFO, Anaheim Ducks
CFO, H & S Ventures
(949) 760-4304
[email protected]
Project: Great Park Ice & FivePoint Arena
References

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Santa Clarita Canyon Country
Community Center

S A N T A C LA RIT A , C A
Our team is provided construction
management services for the
development of a new 27,780 SF
community center and accompanying
outdoor recreational facilities on a 16.5-
acre project site in the City of Santa
Clarita. Phase I included improvements
to Mint Canyon Channel, from an open
channel to a double reinforced concrete
box with drainage improvements and
an underground stormwater infiltration
system. Phase II consisted of precise
grading, architecture/building, and offsite
improvements.

Outdoor improvements include open play
areas, outdoor market/mercado, an event
stage area, a basketball half-court, an
events garden, shade structures, outdoor
restroom building, and a perimeter trail.

Indoor spaces will include a multipurpose
room, gymnasium, classrooms, catering
and teaching kitchen, fitness room, staff
offices, reception lobby, and supporting
uses such as restrooms and storage
areas. The Mint Canyon Channel has
been improved from an open channel
to a double reinforced concrete box,
drainage improvements, and underground
stormwater infiltration system.

V AL UE + SIZE
$58M | 28,000 SF

R E L E V A N C Y
Community Center;
Managed by Cody Roth/
Robert Godfrey

A W A RDS
APWA BEST Project;
Peninsula Clean Energy
Award
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
City of Santa Clarita
Wayne Weber
Parks Planning Manager
(661) 255-4961
[email protected]
“Cody Roth and team helped maintain positive relationships between the City and Contractor, utilizing a strong background in inspection to delivery this fairly complex project successfully.” City of Santa Clarita

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Laguna Beach Village
Entrance & Historical Building

LA GUN A BE A CH, C A
Griffin Structures provided program
management services for the
beautification of the entry to the Laguna
Beach downtown area encompassing
over 4 acres, successfully delivering this
award-winning project on-time and
below budget by $365,000. Combining
California landscape design, water quality
and control, public art, green space
for gatherings, and ample parking for
summer festivals, this city’s entrance
received a picturesque, inviting upgrade .

Two new pedestrian bridges and one
vehicular bridge were created, including
wider multi-use trails and paved access
roads to improve pedestrian, bicyclist and
driver safety at one of the busiest and
most visible city intersection, as well as
the preservation of a historical building.

The project called for the engagement
between various public groups, including
city departments, regional water agencies,
state and regional traffic agencies, and
others.

V AL UE + SIZE
$12M | 4 Acres

R E L E V A N C Y
Historical Renovation;
Community Facility;
Exterior Site Improvements;
Managed by Cody Roth with
support from Susan Harden

A W A RDS
$365K Under Budget; APWA
2020 BEST Project; Creative
& Innovative, ACOE;  (ACEC)
Engineering Excellence
Award
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
City of Laguna Beach
Tom Perez
Project Director
(949) 464-6688
[email protected]
“Thank you. The City has succeeded in delivering a safe, beautiful area for our community to enjoy while delivering the project on time and on budget.”
City of Laguna Beach

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES “The Griffin Structures team did an excellent job to ensure the City’s best interests were met and delivered a very high quality amenity.”
City of Irvine
Quail Hill Community Center

IRVINE, C A
The new 19,000 SF Quail Hill Community
Center in Irvine, Calif. is one of the largest
community centers in the area, and serves
to bring the region together through
education and exploration. Envisioned as a
gateway to nature, the goal was to create
connected indoor and outdoor spaces
that offer various activities, programs and
classes.

Several sustainability strategies were
included to reduce energy and water
use including: solar panel arrays, highefficiency LED lighting, low water use fixtures, and native landscaping.

These strategies resulted in a LEED
Gold certification. Inside the building
houses an exercise room for wellness
activities such as dance and yoga classes;
classrooms for early childhood education
and other special interest classes; a
space for fine arts camps and adult art
classes; and a rentable conference center
for large training events, weddings, and
other group activities. Outdoor spaces
include interpretive gardens, interactive
components for educational opportunities,
and a playground for adventure play.

V AL UE + SIZE
$8M | 19,000 SF

R E L E V A N C Y
Community Center;
Extensive Exterior
Improvements; Managed by
Robert Godfrey

A W A RDS
LEED Gold; APWA Project
of the Year; CPRS Award
of Excellence; EcoAward
USGBC-OC Most Sustainable
Land Plan
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
Tom Perez
Current Project Director,
Laguna Beach
Former CIP Manager, Irvine
(949) 464-6688
[email protected]

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Cypress Community
Center Renovation

C Y PRESS, C A
The original building included a 4,000
SF auditorium with kitchen, classrooms,
dance rooms, and support spaces.

In addition, the facility serves as the
administrative offices for the City’s
Recreation and Parks department.

The building’s entry is via an adjacent
surface parking lot through a raised plaza
courtyard.

The scope of work required complete
interior renovation and modernization
including new ADA upgrades, landscaping,
and total renovation of the entry courtyard
and auditorium patio. The project is the
recipient of an APWA Project of the Year
Award, Parks & Recreation Facilities,
Refurbished.

V AL UE + SIZE
$7M | 24,568 SF

R E L E V A N C Y
Community Center;
Renovation; Managed by
Griffin leadership team

A W A RDS
APWA Project of the Year
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
Laura Detweiler
Former Parks & Rec Director,
Cypress
Director of Rec & Senior
Services, Newport Beach
(949) 644-3158
“The project team that Griffin assembled to guide this project was extremely professional, knowledgeable, and diligent in all aspects of the project.”
City of Cypress

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Downtown Women’s Center, LA, CA (HISTORICAL RENOVATION) This LEED Gold, new Downtown Women’s Center facility currently occupies an existing 6-story historical industrial building on San Pedro Street near the intersection with 3rd Street in the heart of Los Angeles’ skid row. The expanded program included 72 supportive housing apartments, a day center, a medical clinic, a retail store, and administrative offices.

Langham Hotel, London, U.K . (HISTORICAL RENOVATION)
Opened in 1865 in the heart of London, this $200M renovation includes new guestrooms, public spaces, club lounge, and restaurant. Extensive preservation of original hotel features was key to this project, with preserved glass, fixtures, and furnishings, to implement New England-inspired decor while protecting the aesthetically timeless nature of this near 200-year old hotel.

Billingsgate Market, London, U.K. (HISTORICAL RENOVATION) This 323-year old fish market and the oldest in London sought to achieve harmony of modern with old in a single building. The aim was to restore lost details, but to add nothing new. Enormous basement vaults lacking natural light were opened up, while the main floor was uncompromised by the addition of the new galleries - creating the newly constructed and striking Haddock Gallery.

Castiglion del Bosco, Tuscany (HISTORICAL RENOVATION)
Griffin Structures served as the PMCM developer for this 800-year old 4,400 acre site and luxury resort in Tuscany, Italy dedicated to preserving the art and heritage of this estate, fostering an appreciation of deeply-rooted Tuscan tradition . Features include a new village center, boutique hotel, spa, restaurant and culinary academy, gorgeous villas, golf course, and vineyards/winery.

HISTORICAL RENOVATIONS

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Port Theatre, Newport Beach, CA (HISTORICAL RENOVATION) Since the 1950s the Port Theater has served as a local movie house. The restoration to this iconic venue artfully re-imagined the facility aesthetically and provided a sizable, yet intimate, venue with event flexibility and technology in an upscale, stylish atmosphere.

The re-imagined theater now accompanies the re-emerging City as the original Port was to creating the community’s lifestyle.

DGWB HQ (Former Santa Ana City Hall), CA (HISTORICAL RENOVATION) Following construction of the Ross Annex to City Hall, Griffin was contracted to deliver the renovation of the existing 8-floor City Hall office tower later developed into a fourstory 72,000 SF operations building to the DWGB Headquarters.

Pomona Water Resources HQ & Yard, CA (HISTORICAL RENOVATION) The Water Resources Headquarters and Corporate Yard will include an Administration Building, Warehouse, and Shops buildings (8,900 SF), covered parking canopies, equipment storage. This project is also subject to historical conformance review, including the relocation of the iconic Pomona City Stables original brick façade to preserve the historical features of the stables completed in 1909.

Stockton City Hall Renovation, CA (HISTORICAL RENOVATION) This existing five story buildings originally constructed in 1983 is undergoing extensive expansion and renovations, totaling over 129,619 SF of major upgrades to this iconic city building. With the primary goal to consolidate most city offices into one location while providing extensive seismic retrofitting to bring the building up-to-date with current code requirements.

HISTORICAL RENOVATIONS

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES “Griffin provided outstanding construction management services for this project, often going above and beyond to ensure the project went smoothly.”
City of Yorba Linda
Yorba Linda Library &
Cultural Arts Center

YO R B A L IND A , C A
This two-story 45,000 SF library and 13,500
SF arts center. Library features include
expanded collections areas; story time,
teens and tweens spaced; a outdoor
children’s area; group study rooms;
community room and classroom space;
and book store.. The Cultural Arts Center
includes a 250-seat black box theater, art
and dance studios, and gallery display
space.

The campus-like environment features a
central paseo between the two structures,
dedicated outdoor plazas, and great lawn
for additional programming. Designs for
the 4.7-acre site include drop-off areas,
access for specialized backstage theater
equipment, a 234-space parking area,
on-site runoff capture, and native and
drought-tolerant landscaping.

This project was completed $2M
under budget.

V AL UE + SIZE
$52M | 4.7 Acres

R E L E V A N C Y
Community Center /
Library; Extensive Exterior
Improvements; Supported
by Susan Harden

A W A RDS
ASCE Outstanding
Community Improvement
Project; ENR Award of Merit;
APWA BEST Project; CPRS
Excellence in Design Award
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
City of Yorba Linda
Carrie Lixey
Library Director
(714) 777-2466
[email protected]

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Salinas El Gabilan Branch Library &
Community Facilities

S AL I N A S, C A
Griffin Structures and served as the
PMCM developer team utilizing a PublicPrivate Partnership (P3), which provided for the design, financing, construction,
and delivery of the library. The building
was delivered finished and furnished as a
turnkey project.

The new 21,000 SF, two-story building
facility replaces the City’s existing library
and features learning spaces for children,
teen and adults, community rooms, and a
welcoming courtyard.

The integrated P3 delivery method
resulted in a cost-effective, time-efficient
facility.

V AL UE + SIZE
$21M | 21,000 SF

R E L E V A N C Y
Community Center Facilities;
Supported by Susan Harden

A W A RDS
ENR Best Project; Excellence
in Economic Development
Award; Silicon Valley
Business Journal’s Structures
Awards (Community Impact
Category)
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
Cary Ann Siegfried
Library Director, City of
Washington, IA
Former Chief Librarian, City
of Salinas, CA
(214) 490-0014
cary.siegfried@washington.
lib.ia.us
“The new El Gabilan Library will be an historic event in our City’s progress toward a new renaissance era. Thank you for being a great partner.”
City of Salinas

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES The 30-acre site features amenities to support team
sports as well as recreational and family activities.

Esencia Sports Park &
Community Facilities

R A NCH O MISSI O N VIEJ O , C A
Designed to fit into a tiered landscape
concept, Esencia Sports Park is a 30-acre
multi athletic park site in one of Rancho
Mission Viejo’s newest communities.

The lower park site encompasses two
lighted baseball fields and one lighted
softball field with supporting amenities,
including covered dugouts, attached
bullpens and soft toss cages, tiered
concrete spectator seating, batting cages
and scoreboards. A lighted multi-use
soccer field with tiered concrete spectator
seating and a 1,500 SF concession/
restroom building support the team sports
uses.

The lower park also includes a children’s
tot lot and play features. The upper park
site encompasses two lighted tennis
courts, two lighted pickleball courts,
a swimming pool with three swim
lanes, splash pad, and a 1,500 SF pool
building. The pool area amenities include
community barbecues and fire pits as
well as cabanas surrounding the pool for
comfort.

This sports park was envisioned as a
center for sports and family activities with
connections to Esencia’s network of trails.

V AL UE + SIZE
$20M | 30 Acres

R E L E V A N C Y
Community Facilities/
Buildings; Extensive Exterior
Improvements; Managed
with Cody Roth
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
Rancho Mission Viejo
Company
Bill Sadler
Construction Manager
(562) 221-9779
[email protected]

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Marina Park Community
& Sailing Center

NEWP O RT BE A CH, C A
Griffin Structures provided comprehensive
construction management services for
the development Marina Park. The $35
million, 10.5 acre park sits on the Newport
Peninsula and features both marine and
land-side amenities.

The project involved new construction of
a public park; a 24,000 SF Community and
Sailing Center building with classroom,
office and meeting space; a 23-slip visitor
marina; a reconstructed restroom building;
a freestanding playground lighthouse
feature; themed playground; outdoor
fitness circuit; parking lots; open space
and picnic areas; and street frontage
improvements.

The visitor marina is the first marina
approved on the California coastline in
28 years. Marina Park also features a new
6,100 SF Girl Scouts Leadership Center,
funded entirely by the Girl Scouts of
Orange County.

This project was completed $4M
under budget.

V AL UE + SIZE
$36M | 24,000 SF

R E L E V A N C Y
Community Center
Facilities; Extensive Exterior
Improvements

A W A RDS
LEED Silver; APWA National
Project of the Year; APWA
Project of the Year; ASCE
Airports/Ports Award; OCEC
Outstanding Engineering
C L IENT + C O N T A C T
Iris Lee, PE
Deputy Public Works
Director., Seal Beach
Former Newport Beach PM
(714) 328-9760
[email protected]
“Griffin Structures’ team was instrumental in successfully tackling the complexities of building Marina Park, which was ultimately delivered on time and under budget by $4M.”
City of Newport Beach

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY CENTERS / FACILITIES
Laguna Beach Community & Susi-Q Senior Center
This project began with detailed programming and planning contract which later evolved into turn-key, successfully delivered Senior and Community Center, and underground parking garage. The center features three cottage-size structures that each open onto an outdoor space. Rooms include a quiet gathering area for seniors, breakout space, conference room, terraces, art studio, and multi-purpose room.

Carlsbad Pine Avenue Community Center & Gardens
This new two-story project was comprised of an 18,000 SF two-story community center, site improvements, and an ornamental community garden. The multi-purpose gymnasium also features a low climbing wall spans one side of the gym. The second floor houses activity rooms, teen center, homework and classrooms, computer lab, and covered terrace. Outdoor highlights include an “ornamental” garden with a community plaza, water features, and seating.

Burlingame Community Center & Washington Park
This new two-story community center will feature an active lounge, community room, classroom, music studio, tech shop, ceramics and fine arts workshops, teen center, fitness studio, and more. Other components will include the addition of new aboveground and underground parking adjacent to the new building, a new relocated playground, basketball court, and picnic area, and site improvements to the area surrounding the new Center.

Fullerton Multigenerational Community Center
Incorporating a Senior Center and Boys and Girls Club into a single complex, this project houses a 20,000 SF Community Center, a 15,000 SF Senior Center, and natatorium building that includes a six-lane, 25-yard indoor pool designed for year-round swim lessons. A double gymnasium, fitness room, locker rooms, 32-station computer lab, 5,000 SF Grand Hall with formal performance stage and full-service kitchen are also included.

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Half Moon Bay Library & Community Facilities
This library project included the demolition of the existing library, replaced with a new 22,000 SF library. Planning involved extensive community engagement and outreach and includes children’s and teen areas, study, literacy areas, as well as a roof deck, courtyard and atrium. As the first net-zero energy building in San Mateo County, this project includes a large rooftop photovoltaic array, hydronic radiant floor heating, and countless additional sustainable features.

Lawndale Community Center
This three-story community center is designed to maximize the use of its small urban site and complete the Civic Center complex. Parking is located at grade, with the community center program spaces on the second and third floors. The second floor terrace allows for activities in the arts and crafts meeting rooms to expand to the exterior. A large multipurpose main event room and an outdoor terrace are located on the third floor.

Huntington Beach Senior Center
This hub for seniors features a fitness room, group exercise and dance rooms, and versatile classrooms that accommodate educational and arts and crafts activities.

The Senior Center also includes indoor and outdoor gathering spaces as well as a transportation passenger lounge and loading/unloading areas for the City’s transportation network. A commercial kitchen is also housed within the facility, providing daily meals for home-bound seniors.

Buena Park Community Center
Griffin Structures provided construction management services for a new 26,500-squarefoot Community Center that features a 2,700 square foot ballroom, multi-purpose rooms, seven activity rooms, fitness rooms, a catering kitchen, staff offices, and storage as well as a new surface parking lot. Other highlights include the beautiful Mayor’s Garden, which consists of a mission style wooden gazebo and open seating space for various outdoor gatherings. Included working with Crane Architectural Group.

ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY CENTERS / FACILITIES

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Scope of Work

CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Pre-Construction Meeting
Griffin will organize and conduct the Pre-Construction
meeting and provide agenda and meeting minutes
accordingly. Griffin will ensure that all pertinent team members will be present to coordinate with City staff.

Contract Administration
Griffin will work closely with City staff to oversee the mobilization of the Contractor, the phasing of work, and the establishment of suitable and safe construction staging, including, but not limited to, fencing, barricades, temp facilities, temp utilities, construction trailer placement, and other factors. The coordination of this effort will start early in the pre-construction process with a review of the Contractor’s site logistics plan.

Submittal Procedures
Griffin will oversee the distribution of all shop drawings, submittal reviews, RFIs, payment requests, change orders, product data, material delivery dates, daily reports, project logs, and other vital documents. Griffin utilizes Submittal Exchange for expedient distribution and tracking of these documents. We will tailor this effort to provide the exact level of detail expected from the City.

Meetings
Griffin will prepare the agendas and meeting minutes,
discuss the schedule updates and near-term activities;
work with the team to clarify or resolve problems; update the team on the status of change orders, submittals, and RFIs; and review safety issues and other topics as they arise.

Griffin will assign action items to responsible parties along with the corresponding date the action requires completion.

These meetings will be reviewed for concurrence and will be distributed to attendees within five business days.

ESTABLISH
Communication channels & policies

OVERSEE
Document strategies & communication to the field

IDENTIFY
Key challenges to the project

FORMALIZE
& establish action items for team members

REINFORCE
& continue to identify Key project objectives

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Quality Assurance (QA)
Griffin has a very robust QA methodology, and we will
employ that effort in this project to observe, verify, and document the specified level of construction quality.

Coordination of Consultants
Griffin will coordinate and oversee the scheduling of all other consultant inspections including but not limited to historical preservationist, geotechnical, NPDES, materials testing and deputy inspection, and any other specialty consultant retained by the City.

Observation
Griffin will serve as the eyes and ears of the City of San Marino for quality assurance. Accordingly, Griffin will walk the site regularly and inspect all installations for consistency with the construction documents. Specifically, Griffin will enforce the highest quality of workmanship to ensure the City receives the best value for its investment. As part of this process, Griffin takes numerous construction progress photos.

Non-Conforming Work
Griffin will observe all installations and notify the City, design team, and Contractor if any non-confirming work is installed.

These notices will be detailed thoroughly and provide
suggested corrective measures to be confirmed by the City and design team. In addition, we track non-confirming
work via our Field Observation Log and review it during the weekly meeting with the Contractor until resolved.

BEING "IN THE KN O W" WITH

P R O J E C T E D

E V E N T S , L A B O R
& ACTIVITIES
Establishing a very
detailed Schedule of
Values that breaks
out both labor and
materials for each
trade and spec
section.

P R O J E C T

P R O G R E S S &

CONSISTENCY
Reviewing all invoices
for consistency
with improvements
installed in the field.

C O N T R A C T O R

P A Y M E N T

POLICIES
Investigating
the Contractors
payment policies to
subcontractors to
avoid issues of nonpayment.

S U B C O N T R A C T O R

P E R F O R M A N C E &

STABILITY
Evaluating sub
performance to
anticipate potential
bankruptcies who
are not adequately
solvent to perform on
the job

T O PR O TECT TH E U L TIM A TE INTE RESTS O F THE CIT Y

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Demonstrated Cost & Schedule Success
As a result of Griffin Structures extensive experience with protecting Client interests utilizing our hybrid design, construction, and owner mindset, Griffin Structures
projects are historically completed on schedule and
budget. Additionally, we offer an unparalleled level of technical expertise that allows us to unlock unique cost savings opportunities through use of innovative design
considerations, as well as forward thinking planning to get ahead of agency approvals, long lead items, or potential schedule impacts.

In just the last year, the $52M Yorba Linda Library &
Cultural Arts Center was delivered on time and with over $2M returned client funds as a result of additional savings realized within the project contingency, information
systems budget, and the furniture, fixtures and equipment.

Additionally, on the $36M Marina Park Community and
Sailing Center project we were able to deliver this project significantly under budget by 11% and ahead of schedule as well. This is but a mere glimpse into our stellar reputation of timely delivery and financial expertise and we look forward to offering similarly cost and time effective services for this project.

N E W P O R T B E A C H M A R I N A P A R K

COMMUNITY & SAILING CENTER

Y O R B A L I N D A L I B R A R Y &

CULTURAL ARTS CENTER

COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIC CTR
$400M, 500,000 SF

T I M E L Y

DELIVERY

ON BUDGET

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Exercise of Contract Prerogatives
As with all construction projects, the City of San Marino has certain prerogatives embedded within the contract
that allows for specific unilateral actions. These include, but are not limited to unilateral change orders, notices of delay, correction notices, default notices, notices to correct schedule, and other similar communications. Griffin is well versed in all said prerogatives and will advise the City in their proper and effective implementation for the good of the City and the success of the project.

Progress Review
The Griffin Construction Manager will provide a daily
progress review of all activities performed on the project.

This will take the form of a daily report including all workers, equipment, activities, materials, and issues encountered that day. Additionally, a counting of construction days will be accrued as verification of contract days and documentation of activity progress. Any issues or problems will also be documented for future reference. Griffin will also review every schedule provided by the Contractor to confirm they meet the overall objectives of the project. Accordingly, Griffin will oversee and ensure that activities in the field are consistent with the approved schedule, and we will
recommend corrective action should they fail to correlate.

Maintain On-Site Records
Griffin will manage all project documentation via our cloudbased document management system. We will maintain all shop drawings, product data, samples, submittals, materials, equipment, and applicable handbooks. In addition, all
documents will be maintained, archived, and turned over to the City at the completion of the project.

Schedule of Values & Processing of Payments
Griffin will establish, or cause to be established by the Contractor, a comprehensive Schedule of Values for the
entirety of the project for approval by the City. Once
approved, this will serve as the basis for all progress payments, which Griffin will review for consistency with progress in the field and make recommendations to the
Contractor for correction. Once corrected, Griffin will make recommendations to the City for processing.

Evaluate Change Order Proposal Costs
Griffin will review all change orders and provide
supplemental information as needed to justify their approval or rejection. Griffin will negotiate with the Contractor on the City’s behalf and serve as the point of contact for resolving issues and mitigating potential claims. Specifically, Griffin will seek to avoid claims.

Change Order Tracking
Griffin will maintain a comprehensive log of all change orders for the project. This log will include anticipated change orders not yet received, change order requests, their review or rejection status, and final documentation of all approved change orders.

F U L L E R T O N M U L T I G E N E R A T I O N A L

COMMUNITY CENTER

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES If the direction is clear, the drawings and
specifications consistent, and the direction to
the field in line with these documents, then
there is little to no chance of a future claim.

CLARITY = ENFORCEABILITY
This is a critical concept that many professionals
do not grasp or pursue. Claims arise out of a
need to mitigate against risk or loss. Avoiding
risk for all parties lowers the likelihood of claims.

W H E N E V E R Y O N E S U C C E E D S ,

THE CITY SUCCEEDS
Despite the efforts above, sometimes mishaps
occur. A submittal may get submitted and
approved incorrectly. A material specification
may be discontinued, and its replacement is
three times the cost. Drawings may not clearly
identify the total scope of work. In instances
like these, clear commitment to value rules
the process. In each of the instances, Griffin
navigates and resolves the issues in a manner
that provides value to the City (i.e. little or no
cost increase), continued progress (timely
decisions that do not delay the schedule), and
creative architectural solutions (maintaining
the overall quality of the finished product). By
having a balanced understanding of all the
aspects of value to the project Griffin mitigates
the conditions that often result in claims.

M A I N T A I N I N G A

COMMITMENT TO VALUE
Despite all of the above, sometimes claims
do arise. The key defense against these
occurrences is clear documentation, and a
comprehensive understanding of the contract
and contract code. Griffin Structures employs
elite construction management professionals
who have extensive understanding in contracts
and contract code and employs a sophisticated
and comprehensive document management
system that ensures claims can be mitigated
when unavoidable.

C L E A R D O C U M E N T A T I O N +

LEGAL UNDERSTANDING
Claim Mitigation and Avoidance
Of particular importance to the health of a project is claims management. The most effective way to mitigate claims is to avoid them altogether. This seems obvious but is in fact the most challenging aspect of managing a successful project. To avoid claims, we follow a few key principles:

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Project Status Reports
Griffin prepares a monthly project status report for
distribution to all parties City staff deems appropriate. This report will include key milestones, anticipated work pending, budget updates, photographs, and any key challenges
encountered.

Accounting Records
Griffin brings significant experience in cost accounting methods, including the management of contract unit costs and T&M analysis. We will employ that experience to provide comprehensive cost accounting records and controls. Griffin will use its cost controls system to establish a master budget that captures all costs associated with the project. We will provide regular updates to the City throughout the project.

Permits
Griffin will work with the City and design team to ensure all permits are pulled and all requirements of the permitting process are enforced.

Initial Start-Up & Testing
As part of the commissioning process, all installations will go through a pre-functional and functioning testing protocol.

These tests will be managed and documented by the
Commissioning Agent and overseen by Griffin.

Project Closeout User Training
Griffin will oversee and attend all training sessions with City staff. We will require that all training sessions be recorded and that those tapes be turned over to the City for future reference. These sessions will be performed in accordance with CalGreen commissioning requirements and managed
in a manner that is consistent with state building code.

Equipment Instruction Manuals
Integral to our cloud- based document management
system, Submittal Exchange will assemble all guarantees, certifications, affidavits, leases, operating and maintenance manuals, warranties and any other closeout documents. This system will provide a complete digital file for all documents, for future use, as well as maintain cloud-based file for future use.

SANTA CLARITA CANYON COUNTRY COMMUNITY CENTER

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Completion of Contracts & Project
Griffin will coordinate the final punch walk of the project to ensure all improvements are per the plans and
specifications. Throughout the course of construction, Griffin will employ a Field Observation Log to identify quality issues observed by the project team on an ongoing basis. This will function as an ongoing pre-punch list, and therefore help to minimize the issues discovered at the final punch walk.

Griffin will also oversee the follow up punch walks to confirm corrective action is resolved. Once completed, Griffin will issue a comprehensive punch list for completion by the
Contractor. Afterwards, Griffin will oversee the completion of these items and ensure that all deficiencies and corrections are completed to the satisfaction of the City.

Project As-Builts
Griffin will review monthly and ensure the Contractor
maintains an As-Built set utilizing the most current
drawings.

Final Project Report & Payment
Griffin will prepare a final report for the City that captures a final summary of all financial matters including Contractor change orders, consultant costs, services, FF&E, and other costs related to the project. This report will also address all schedule issues and contract dates, as well as final acceptance summary with signed receipts from all City staff.

The final report will address all close out documentation as well as final FF&E purchases and installations.

Conclusion
Griffin takes pride in providing unparalleled construction management services. As described above, Griffin will serve as the eyes and ears of the City of San Marino. Our motto is “no surprises” with “Excellence in Project Delivery”. We achieve that by proper management and clear and concise documentation for defense and resolution of unavoidable issues.

YORBA LINDA LIBRARY & CULTURAL ARTS CENTER

S ecti o n 1. P r o p o s al S umm a r y GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Performance Criteria
Describe how your team is organized to provide the services to perform this Project.

Please see page 11.

Describe the major strengths of your team.

Please see bottom left criteria included in team resumes on pages 12 through 15.

Describe the major difficulties that you might expect to encounter in designing this Project to ensure that City receives high quality design and construction. Describe the methods you would use to overcome these difficulties.

See pages 4 and 5.

Describe your firm’s ability to perform the work within the schedule outlined herein.

See page 32.

Describe your firm’s claims experience.

See page 34.

SECTION 2. FINANCIAL & RELATED INFORMATION
“ G R I F F I N S T R U C T U R E ’ S

C O N S T R U C T I O N M A N A G E M E N T T E A M

W A S I N S T R U M E N T A L I N S U C C E S S F U L L Y

T A C K L I N G T H E C O M P L E X I T I E S O F

B U I L D I N G M A R I N A P A R K , W H I C H W A S

U L T I M A T E L Y D E L I V E R E D O N T I M E A N D UNDER BUDGET.”
- CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH

S ecti o n 2. F in a nci al & R e l a ted I nf o rm a ti o n GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Griffin Structures does not have any alleged, prior or ongoing, contract failures, civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending which involves Griffin Structures being judged guilty or liable, including threatened litigation.

Claims & Litigation History

VERNOLA PARK EXPANSION & COMMUNITY CENTER, JURUPA VALLEY

S ecti o n 2. F in a nci al & R e l a ted I nf o rm a ti o n GRIFFIN STRUCTURES Insurability Letter
3697 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste 230
Lafayette, CA 94549
assuredpartners.com
June 14, 2022
Robert Newman, PE
Interim Director Parks & Public Works/City Engineer
2200 Huntington Dr.

San Marino, CA 91108
RE: RFQ/RFP – San Marino Center Renovation – Project No. 20-1000 Dear Robert:

This letter is to confirm to you that Griffin Structures, Inc. carries an insurance program that currently meets the insurance requirements set forth in the captioned RFQ/RFP. Their existing program currently reflects the necessary coverages, limits, and endorsements to validate contractual requirements. Should you have any additional questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 714-427-3494.

Sincerely,
Senior Account Executive
[email protected]
CA License 6003745
3697 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste 230
Lafayette, CA 94549
assuredpartners.com
AssuredPartners Design Professionals Insurance Services, LLC CA License 6003745 June 14, 2022
Robert Newman, PE
Interim Director Parks & Public Works/City Engineer
2200 Huntington Dr.

San Marino, CA 91108
RE: RFQ/RFP – San Marino Center Renovation – Project No. 20-1000 Dear Robert:

This letter is to confirm to you that Griffin Structures, Inc. carries an insurance program that currently meets the insurance requirements set forth in the captioned RFQ/RFP. Their existing program currently reflects the necessary coverages, limits, and endorsements to validate contractual requirements. Should you have any additional questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 714-427-3494.

Sincerely,
Senior Account Executive
[email protected]
CA License 6003745

SECTION 3. RESPONSE FORMS
“ T H E G R I F F I N T E A M D I D A N

E X C E L L E N T J O B T O E N S U R E T H E
C I T Y ’ S B E S T I N T E R E S T S W E R E M E T . I N

P A R T I C U L A R , T H E D E T A I L E D R E V I E W

O F C H A N G E O R D E R S E N S U R E D T H E

C I T Y G O T E X A C T L Y W H A T W E P A I D

F O R A N D T H A T T H E P R O J E C T S T A Y E D
WITHIN BUDGET.”
- CITY OF IRVINE

S ecti o n 3. R esp o nse Fo rms GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Exhibit H

PROPOSAL AUTHORIZATION
NAME OF RESPONDENT_______________________________________________________

1. The above-named Respondent is a Respondent to the Request for Qualifications / Request for Proposals of City of San Marino Construction Management Services for the San Marino Center Renovation Project No. 20-1000 for Construction Management Services (“RFQ/RFP”) and possesses the legal authority to submit this Proposal.

2. The undersigned is authorized to conduct all negotiations for and legally bind the respondent in all matters relating to this proposal submittal.

3. The undersigned has reviewed, understands, is able to comply with and agrees to be bound by the General Conditions Governing this RFP described in Section 7 of the RFP.

4. The undersigned grants City a right to conduct reference checks and reasonable investigation of all information provided by Respondent.

5. The undersigned certifies that this Proposal is irrevocable until 120 days after its submission date.

Signature: ________________________________________________________________ Print Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________
Griffin Structures
Jon Hughes
Executive Vice President of Operations
June 30, 2022

S ecti o n 3. R esp o nse Fo rms GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Exhibit I
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDUM FORM (“ACKNOWLEDGMENT”)

TO CITY OF SAN MARINO
THIS ACKNOWLEDGMENT IS SUBMITTED BY:
_____________________________________________________________________________ (Firm/Company Name)

1. In submitting this Proposal, Proposer represents that the Proposer has examined all of the Contract Documents and the following Addenda (receipt of all of which is hereby acknowledged).

Addendum Number Addendum Date Signature of Proposer
Griffin Structures
4 3
2 1 6/21/22
6/23/22
6/23/22
6/23/22

S ecti o n 3. R esp o nse Fo rms GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Exhibit F

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF RFQ/RFP FORM
In acknowledgment of receipt of this Request for Qualifications / Request for Proposal of the City for Construction Management Services (“RFP”), the undersigned Respondent agrees that he/she/it has received a complete copy, beginning with the Title Page and Table of Contents and ending with Exhibit I.

This Acknowledgment of Receipt of RFQ/RFP Form must be signed and returned to the Project Manager indicated below no later than (time/date) pursuant to Section 4.1 of the RFQ/RFP. Only interested parties who elect to return this Acknowledgment of Receipt of RFQ/RFP Form completed with the indicated intention of submitting a proposal will be placed on the distribution list for any and all Addendum/Addenda to this RFQ/RFP. The name and address provided below will be used for all written correspondence related to this RFQ/RFP.

Firm: ________________________________________________________________ Contact Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________ Telephone: ________________________________________________________________ Facsimile: ________________________________________________________________ E-mail: ________________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________ State: _____________ Zip: ____________ Signature: ________________________________________
Print Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________
This entity does /does not  intend to respond to this RFQ/RFP [check appropriate box].

Respondent must return this signed form to the project manager identified in RFQ/RFP Section 1.2.

Jon Hughes
Executive Vice President of Operations
June 30, 2022
Griffin Structures
Jon Hughes
Executive Vice President of Operations
(949) 497 - 9000
(949) 497 - 8883
[email protected]
1 Technology Drive, Building i, Suite 829
Irvine CA 92618
X

S ecti o n 3. R esp o nse Fo rms GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Exhibit E

ACCEPTANCE OF FORM OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
NAME OF RESPONDENT_______________________________________________________ The above Respondent hereby agrees to sign Professional Services Agreement substantially similar to the form of Professional Services Agreement attached to the RFP as Exhibit D, or has attached proposed modifications to the form of Professional Services Agreement as an Addendum to this signed Acceptance.
[Respondent must check one of the following boxes, and complete if applicable]  Respondent’s proposed modifications to the Professional Services Agreement are attached as Attachment[s] ________________________ [complete as applicable] to this signed Acceptance, pursuant to the “Strikeout”/“Underline” format described in RFP Section 3.1.  Respondent has no proposed modifications to the Professional Services Agreement.

Signature: ________________________________________________________________ Print Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________
Griffin Structures
within the following four pages
Jon Hughes
Executive Vice President of Operations
June 30, 2022
X

S ecti o n 3. R esp o nse Fo rms GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

JON HUGHES CERTIFICATIONS ROBERT GODFREY CERTIFICATIONS

CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE A & B

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE
1 TECHN OLO G Y DRIVE
B U I L DING I SUITE 829
I R VINE, C A 92 618
949 497 9000

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE
1850 W A RBU R T O N A VEN U E
SUITE 120
S A N T A C LA R A , C A 95 050
408 955 0431

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

KIZH NATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
-A Native American Owned and Operated Small Minority Business-

NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT
This agreement for Native American monitoring services is entered into on June 16, 2022 by and between, KIZH NATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (“KNRM”), and CITY OF SAN MARINO (City of San Marino or the “Lead Agency”) (collectively referred to as, the “Parties”), for the compliance of the development project located at 1800 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California (the “Project Site”), with the mitigation measures adopted by the Project lead agency, City of San Marino (the “lead agency” or “ City of San Marino”), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA) (hereinafter, the “Project”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Tribe consulted with the lead agency regarding the adverse impacts the Project will have on tribal cultural resources (“TCR”) at, on, and/or beneath the Project Site, and proposed mitigation measures to reduce those impacts below the threshold of significance as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”);
WHEREAS, the lead agency found that substantial evidence supported the adoption of the Tribe’s proposed TCR mitigation measures and made those mitigations mandatory conditions of the Project approval (collectively, the “Mitigations”);
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is for the protection and preservation of the Tribe’s TCRs and compliance of the Project with the adopted Mitigations, which are attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference.

Accordingly, KNRM and City of San Marino hereby agree as follows:
[CONTINUED ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

MONITORING AGREEMENT

1. SCOPE OF WORK

1.1. KNRM’s Native American monitor will be physically present on the Project Site at all times grounddisturbing Project activities are occurring. To implement the “tribal cultural resource” (“TCR”) Mitigations adopted for this Project, KNRM’s monitor shall:
a) Monitor all “ground disturbing activities,” including but not limited to, demolition, grubbing/clearing, rough grading, precise grading, mass grading, trenching, excavation, boring, augering, and weed abatement on previously disturbed and undisturbed ground; b) Identify uncovered and/or discovered TCRs, including but not limited to Native American artifacts, village sites, trade routes, midden deposits, ceremonial locations, human remains, and grave goods (collectively referred to as, “TCR” or “TCRs”); c) Ensure all TCRs, especially human remains and associated grave goods, are treated with culturally appropriate dignity and respect, and are handled and/or removed from the Project Site in accordance with the Tribe’s ceremonial and cultural practices ; d) Attend and participate in Project meetings, including trainings and conferences, to inform Project personnel about the potential for TCR discoveries and the appropriate courses of action if/when a discovery occurs;
e) Create daily logs of observations made during monitoring, and provide written reports detailing each TCR discovery, including but not limited to, the date and time, location on the Project Site, nature of the soil in the discovery location, facts pertaining to the Project activities in that area, the location of the perimeter around the TCR discovery that the monitor establishes to protect the location, and any cultural findings; and f) Report discoveries to the Tribal Chairman and/or the Tribal Archaeologist, and incorporate their input regarding the treatment of the TCR(s).

1.2. In order to fully and effectively execute the monitoring services identified in Section 1.1 above, the Parties agree that KNRM’s monitor shall possess all of the following rights, which may be asserted at any time and at any location on the Project Site:
a) To access any/all areas of the Project Site necessary to physically observe the “grounddisturbing activities”, as that phrase is defined in Section 1.1(a) above, as those grounddisturbing activities are occurring; b) To halt construction activity within the surrounding 50 feet (or more where deemed necessary by KNRM’s monitor) of a discovered TCR;
c) To meet and confer with the Project Supervisor in a timely manner regarding how to redirect Project activities in the vicinity of a discovered TCR and the time frame for imposing a no-work perimeter around a discovered TCR;
d) To meet and confer with the Project Supervisor in a timely manner regarding issues pertaining to effectively monitoring the Project Site in a manner that ensures compliance with the Mitigations;
e) To be timely notified of all Project meetings, including safety meetings, trainings, scheduling, etc., and permitted to attend any/all meetings; and f) To be treated in a respectful and courteous manner by all Project management, staff, personnel, contractors, and subcontractors.

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

2. DISCOVERY OF NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS, GRAVE GOODS, AND/OR HUMAN REMAINS

2.1. If TCRs are found, the Tribe will retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, for educational purposes.

2.2. If human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the Project Site, all damage or disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).

2.3. The Lead Agency expressly acknowledges the obligations required of it under governing State and Federal laws, including but not limited to, the California Public Resources Code, California Health & Safety Code, California Government Code, and California Code of Regulations, in the event human remains are discovered on the Project Site, and expressly agrees to comply with all such obligations, and to the extent possible, obtain compliance of the property owner in the event human remains are discovered on the Project Site but on land not owned and/or controlled by the Lead Agency.

2.4. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, subsections (d) and (e), if human remains or associated burial goods are found on the Project Site and in an area that is under the ownership and/or control of the Lead Agency, the Lead Agency agrees to provide a designated area on the property at which to reinter the remains and/or burial goods with appropriate dignity that is not subject to further disturbance.

2.5. In the event that human remains and/or burial goods are found within the Project Site but in an area that is outside of the ownership and/or control of the Lead Agency, the Lead Agency will make a reasonable effort to secure an agreement with the property owner to reinter the remains and/or burial goods with appropriate dignity in a designated area on the Project Site that is not subject to further disturbance, as is required of the property owner pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, subsections (d) and (e). If such an agreement with the property owner cannot be reached, to the extent feasible, the Lead Agency will provide a designated area on the Project Site that is within the Lead Agency’s ownership and/or control, for reinternment of the human remains and/or burial goods.

2.6. If the portion of the Project Site where human remains and/or burial goods are discovered is within the ownership and/or control of the Lead Agency, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b), the Lead Agency shall ensure that the immediate area surrounding the discovery will be isolated and remain undisturbed until recommendations by the designated most likely descendent (within approximately 48-hours). The grading and excavation may continue outside of the isolated area.

3. FEES AND INVOICES

3.1. The Lead Agency agrees to pay KNRM for the above described monitoring services for the Project at the following rates:

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

a) The standard, day-time rate per monitor is eighty-five dollars ($85.00) per hour for an eight (8) hour day (“Standard Workday”). A night differential rate of $95.00 per hour will be applied for monitoring performed between the hours of 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. b) The rate for monitoring that exceeds 8 hours per day, or 40 hours per week is $ 127.50 per hour.
c) The rate for monitoring performed on a Saturday or Sunday is $127.50 per hour. d) The rate for project management services, including but not limited to, consultant communications, monitor coordination, project documentation, is one hundred and thirty dollars ($130) per hour;
e) The rate for Project Director services, including consultation, Project meetings and trainings, and communications, documentation, and coordination pertaining to compliance issues, is two hundred dollars ($200) per hour;
f) In the event TCRs are discovered (whether prehistoric or historic), a KNRM Archaeologist (who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for Professional Archaeology), shall be retained in addition to the monitor to assess the TCR, at a rate of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150) per hour;
g) Mileage shall be reimbursed at the Federal Standard Rate for travel to and from the Project Site, to/from KNRM’s office located at 910 N. Citrus Avenue, Covina, California; h) Lodging is required if the monitor must travel 40 miles or more to the Project site, and is reimbursed at the rate of two-hundred dollars ($200) per night; and i) Per diem for meals at the rate of seventy-five dollars ($75) per day.

3.2. If it is unreasonable for one monitor to fulfill their duties because Project Activities are occurring concurrently, at more than one location on the Project Site and at a distance impractical for a single monitor to serve simultaneously, then an additional monitor will be required at identical rates and on identical terms.

3.3. KNRM shall invoice Lead Agency for fees monthly. The Lead Agency shall make payment to KNRM not later than thirty (30) days following the invoice date (Net 30). An advance deposit is required from the Lead Agency, in an amount equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the estimated cost budgeted for the Project, prior to any work performed by KNRM under this Agreement. Invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date are subject to a finance charge equal to ten percent (10%) of the monthly invoice total. Checks shall be made payable to “Kizh Nation Resources Management” and mailed to:

Kizh Nation Resources Management
910 N. Citrus Ave
Covina, CA 91722

4. NOTICE

4.1. In the event a scheduled Standard Workday is canceled entirely or the hours are altered for any reason, the Lead Agency shall promptly notify KNRM no later than 5:00 p.m. PST on the business day prior to the altered day, at the “Contact Information” set forth in Section 5 below. If KNRM has not received timely notice of a schedule cancellation or change, a minimum fee of three hundred dollars ($300.00) shall be applied per late cancellation event.

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

4.2. All communications pertaining to or that may impact KNRM’s implementation of the services set forth in section 1 of this Agreement shall be made in writing and per the contact information in section 5 below.

5. CONTACT INFORMATION

5.1. Notices to KNRM:

Telephone - (626) 926-4131
KNRM Office - (626) 521-5827
Email: [email protected]

5.2. Lead Agency:

Name: _______________________________
Phone: _______________________________
Email: _______________________________

5.3. On-Site Project Contact (i.e., “Project Supervisor”) Name: _______________________________
Phone: _______________________________
Email: _______________________________

6. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

6.1. Despite any language in this Agreement to the contrary, KNRM’s obligations under this Agreement (including any actual or alleged breach or default by KNRM) do not constitute personal obligations of the individual partners, directors, officers, members or shareholders of KNRM or the Tribe, or the partners or members of KNRM or the Tribe. The Lead Agency shall not seek recourse against the individual partners, directors, officers, members or shareholders of KNRM or the Tribe, or any of their personal assets for satisfaction of any liability with respect to this Agreement.

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

6.2. In consideration of the benefits accruing hereunder to the Lead Agency and notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the Lead Agency hereby covenants and agrees for itself and all of its successors and assigns that the liability of KNRM and the Tribe for KNRM’s obligations under this Agreement (including any liability as a result of any actual or alleged failure, breach or default hereunder by KNRM or any alleged tort committed in connection with KNRM’s work), shall be limited solely to KNRM’s insurance coverage as provided in Section 7 of this Agreement.

6.3. In the event the Lead Agency performs (directly or through a contractor, subcontractor, agent, representative or otherwise at the Lead Agency’s direction) or allows to be performed grounddisturbing work without a monitor present in violation of Mitigations and in breach of this Agreement, KNRM will suffer substantial harm for which it is impracticable to fix actual damages. To limit or prevent further harm, the Lead Agency agrees and consents to the immediate issuance of a Stop Work Order by the Project lead agency, which shall stay in full force and effect unless and until the Parties resolve the non-compliance events and resulting damages.

6.4. In an effort to liquidate in advance the sum that should represent such damages and to avoid the additional costs Lead Agency will incur to remedy that breach by redoing all non-compliant grounddisturbing Project activities with a KNRM monitor present, Lead Agency agrees to pay KNRM a “Noncompliance Fee” equal to the cost of redoing all non-compliant ground-disturbing Project activities, plus KNRM’s monitoring fees for monitoring those activities. You acknowledge that you have been given notice of this Noncompliance Fee and agree that such a fee is fair and reasonable.

7. INSURANCE

7.1. A certificate of general liability insurance coverage can be provided upon request.

7.2. KNRM does not hold an automobile liability policy for the monitors. Vehicles are only used for transportation to and from the Project Site. Each individual monitor is required to carry automobile insurance pursuant to California State law. Proof of a monitor’s automobile insurance can be provided upon request.

8. MISCELLANEOUS

8.1. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed pursuant to, the laws of the state of California.

8.2. Recitals. All recitals set forth in this Agreement are contractual.

8.3. Terms and Headings. Section headings of this Agreement are for convenience, are merely descriptive, and do not alter the rights of the parties.

8.4. Time. Time is of the essence with respect to performance of every provision of this Agreement in which time or performance is a factor. All references in this Agreement to “days” shall mean calendar days unless specifically modified herein to be “business” days.

8.5. Professional Fees. If either KNRM or Lead Agency should bring suit against the other with respect to this Agreement, then all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the prevailing party therein (including, without limitation, its accountants’, attorneys’, experts’ and other professional’s fees, expenses and court costs), shall be paid by the other party.

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

8.6. Waiver. The waiver by either party of any breach by the other party of any term, covenant or condition herein contained shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant and condition herein contained, nor shall any custom or practice which may become established between the Parties in the administration of the terms hereof be deemed a waiver of, or in any way affect, the right of any party to insist upon the performance by the other in strict accordance with said terms.

8.7. Prior Agreements; Amendments. This Agreement, contains all of the covenants, provisions, agreements, conditions and understandings between the Parties concerning the Project and any other matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement, and no prior agreement or understanding, oral or written, express or implied, pertaining to the Project or any such other matter shall be effective for any purpose. No provision of this Agreement may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing signed by the Parties hereto or their respective successors in interest. The Parties acknowledge that all prior agreements, representations and negotiations are deemed superseded by the execution of this Agreement to the extent they are not expressly incorporated herein. The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each has participated in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement; therefore, in the event of an ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of, this Agreement, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rule of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist or against the draftsman. Any deletion of language from this Agreement prior to its execution by the Parties shall not be construed to raise any presumption, canon of construction or implication, including, without limitation, any implication that the Parties intended thereby to state the converse of the deleted language.

8.8. Separability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any other provision hereof, and such other provisions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the fullest extent permitted by law.

8.9. Force Majeure. In the event that either party hereto shall be delayed or hindered in or prevented from the performance of any act required hereunder by reason of strikes, lock-outs, labor troubles, inability to procure materials, failure of power, governmental moratorium or other governmental action or inaction (including failure, refusal or delay in issuing permits, approvals and/or authorizations), orders/closures/restrictions pertaining to COVID-19, injunction or court order, riots, insurrection, war, fire, earthquake, flood, inclement weather in excess of average for the Los Angeles County area or other natural disaster or other reason of a like nature not the fault of the party delayed in performing work or doing acts required under the terms of this Agreement (herein collectively, "Force Majeure Delays"), then performance of such act shall be excused for the period of the delay and the period for the performance of any such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay, provided the delayed party has notified the other party of the Force Majeure Delay within five (5) business days of learning of the same, such notice specifically describes the Force Majeure Delay and its expected duration, and the delayed party regularly updates the other party of the status of the same and the delayed party takes all commercially reasonable efforts to mitigate the effects and minimize the duration of the delay. The provisions of this Section 7.9 shall not apply to nor operate to excuse Lead Agency (or any thirdparty contractor operating on behalf of Lead Agency) from the payment of any fees owed to or the reimbursement of costs incurred by KNRM in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, nor extend the date for payment of same to KNRM.

8.10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which shall be one and the same agreement. Facsimile and electronic signatures are valid and binding.

8.11. Lead Agency’s Authority. The agent/representative of the Lead Agency that executes this Agreement represents and warrants that: (a) the Lead Agency is qualified to do business in the state

_________
________-KNRM – NATIVE AMERICAN MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT

of California; (b) such persons executing this Agreement are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on the Lead Agency’s behalf, or a duly adopted resolution of the Lead Agency’s board of directors; and (c) this Agreement is binding upon the Lead Agency in accordance with its terms.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of ________________, 2022. “LEAD AGENCY” CITY OF SAN MARINO

*By: ___________________________________

Print Name: _________________________
Print Title: __________________________
“KNRM” KIZH NATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

*By: ___________________________________

Print Name: _________________________

Print Title: __________________________

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey Report
San Marino Center
(Project No 20-1000)
1800 Huntington Drive
San Marino, California 91108
Prepared for:

Mr. Michael Throne, PE
City of San Marino
Parks and Public Works Department
2200 Huntington Drive
San Marino, California 91108-2639
Prepared By:

Vista Environmental Consulting, Inc.
1054 North Tustin Avenue
Anaheim, California 92807
Phone: (714) 289-2600
November 29, 2021
Project No. 212206001

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i

MAIN REPORT

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 METHODOLOGY 2

3.0 RESULTS 5

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 11

5.0 LIMITATIONS & EXCLUSIONS 14

APPENDICES

A SAMPLE LOCATION FIELD DRAWINGS

B ASBESTOS LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS

C XRF LEAD DATA TABLE

D CONSULTANT CERTIFICATES

E PHOTO LOG (DAMAGED ACM & DEBRIS)

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the request of City of San Marino, Vista Environmental Consulting, Inc. (VISTA) performed Comprehensive, Semi-Destructive Hazardous Materials Surveys of the San Marino Center, located at 1800 Huntington Drive in the City of San Marino, Los Angeles County, California (the Project Site). The building is planned for renovation activities in the near future.

The survey was performed to identify and sample accessible, suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), asbestos-containing construction materials (ACCMs) and representative building components for the presence of lead-based paints (LBPs)/lead-bearing substances (LBSs)/lead-containing surface coatings (LCSCs), identification of universal waste (UW) rule materials and other building-related hazardous materials that may be present within the building in preparation for the planned renovations of the structure.

The survey performed was limited to the structure and project hardscape within our scope of services, was semi-intrusive in nature, and did include limited, reasonable, semi-destructive testing to identify and sample materials located beneath finishes and/or enclosed in wall voids, pipe chases, and the like. There is a possibility that additional hazardous materials may be encountered in inaccessible areas (e.g., interstitial wall, floor joist and ceiling spaces) during building renovation activities. Suspect hazardous materials encountered during renovation activities that have not been assessed and sampled either may be assumed to be hazardous and handled accordingly, or may be properly assessed and sampled to determine if they contain hazardous or regulated materials.

The northeast perimeter of the attic was inaccessible and may have additional suspect materials that were not identified during the survey. See maps for locations of inaccessible areas.

The results of the survey and testing indicate that hazardous or regulated materials are present at the Project Site. The following tables list the hazardous materials identified, the general location of the representative materials and the estimated quantity:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CONTAMINANT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY1
Plaster Ceiling Heavy Textured North Side of the Building Asbestos (ACM) 2
<1% Chrysotile
~1,000 SF
Plaster Walls/Ceiling Smooth Finish Prominent Throughout Asbestos (ACM) 2
<1% Chrysotile
~12,500 SF
Sink Undercoat Mastic Black Wash Room and Kitchen
Asbestos (ACM)
3 – 4% Chrysotile
~2 EA
Window Pane Sealant Brown Interior Windows
Asbestos (ACM) 2
<1% Chrysotile
~43 Bays

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 ii

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CONTAMINANT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY1
Duct Mastic Gray Stage Mechanical
Asbestos (ACM)
2% Chrysotile
~5 SF
Vinyl Floor Tile/Mastic 9” Brown/Black Office and Storage Rooms Asbestos (ACM)
Tile = 20% Chrysotile Mastic
– 2-3% Chrysotile
~500 SF
Basecove/Mastic
4” Black (w/ white
paint)/Tan 2
nd Floor Restroom
Asbestos (ACM)
Basecove = 8% Chrysotile /
Mastic = NAD
~60 LF
Window Putty White/Tan Interior and Exterior
Windows
Asbestos (ACM)
2% Chrysotile ~43 Bays
Duct Insulation and Debris
(Aircell)
4 Gray, Corrugated Paper
Attic,
(Assumed present in Wall
Voids)
Asbestos (ACM)
50% Chrysotile
~ 100 SF 4
(Visible)
Duct Registers (Aircell) Gray, Corrugated Paper Attic @ Vent Registers Asbestos (ACM) 60% Chrysotile
~15 EA
Roof Penetration Mastic White/Black Roof @ Penetrations Throughout
Asbestos (ACM)
5% Chrysotile ~50 SF
Pitch Pocket Mastic White/Black South Roof Asbestos (ACM) 5% Chrysotile
~10 SF
HVAC Base Sealant Gray/Black Roof @ Center
Asbestos (ACM)
10% Chrysotile
~15 SF
Asbestos Cement Pipes Gray, 4”, 12”, 8” Roof/Attic
Asbestos (ACM)
15% Chrysotile
200 LF
Roof Flashing Sealant White Roof, Above SE Storage
Rooms
Asbestos (ACM)
8% Chrysotile
100 LF
Mirror Mastic
(ASSUMED ACM)
Inaccessible / Destructive
Testing Needed Lobby and Restrooms Asbestos (ACM) 3

ASSUMED
~4 EA
Vibration Dampers
(ASSUMED ACM)
Inaccessible / Destructive
Testing Needed Attached to HVAC Units Asbestos (ACM) 3

ASSUMED
~8 EA
Handrails Wood, Tan Stage
Lead-bearing Substance

0.7 mg/cm2
20 LF
Handrails Metal, White/Black Vestibule and Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.4 – 1.8 mg/cm2
140 LF
Door with Windows Wood, Beige Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.1 mg/cm2
21 LF
Doors Wood, White/Beige Exterior
Lead-based Pain

1.0 - 1.8 mg/cm2
53 EA
Door Frame Wood, Brown Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.2 mg/cm2
21 LF
Door Jambs Wood, White Interior
Lead-bearing Substance

0.8 mg/cm2
45 EA
Doors w/Windows Wood, Beige Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.1 mg/cm2
2 EA

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 iii

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CONTAMINANT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY1
Window Sills Wood, Beige Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.3 mg/cm2
110 LF
Window Casings Wood, White/Beige Interior and Exterior
Lead-based Paint

0.7 - 1.3 mg/cm2
46 EA
Window Casings Metal, White/Beige Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.2 - 1.6 mg/cm2
121 EA
Window Frame Wood, Brown Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.2 mg/cm2
21 LF
Window Frames Metal, White/Beige Exterior
Lead-based Paint

0.7 - 1.0 mg/cm2
121 EA
Floor Drains Metal, Brass Restrooms
Lead-based Paint

2.6 mg/cm2
2 EA
Wall/Floor Tiles Ceramic, Tan 2nd Floor Restroom
Lead-based Paint

6.3 mg/cm2
80 SF
Beam Brackets Metal, Beige Dining Room
Lead-based Paint

1.4 mg/cm2
Not Quantified
Wall Fan Décor Metal, White Dining Room
Lead-based Paint

3.0 mg/cm2
1 EA
Chandeliers Metal, White Dining Room
Lead-based Paint

3.4 mg/cm2
15 EA
Overhang Posts Metal, Brown/Beige Exterior
Lead-based Paint

1.7 - 1.9 mg/cm2
255 LF
Downspouts Metal, White Exterior
Lead-bearing Substance

0.7 mg/cm2
92 LF
Flashing Metal, Beige Exterior
Lead-bearing Substance

0.7 mg/cm2
~400 LF
Fascia Wood, Beige Exterior
Lead-based Paint

0.9 - 1.4
~400 LF
LCSCs Detected (See XRF Lead Data Table)
Fluorescent Light Tubes Interior Universal Waste (UW) ~176 EA Fluorescent Light Tubes (Small) Interior Universal Waste (UW) ~16 EA Light Fixture Ballasts Interior Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)/Electronic Waste ~88 EA
Flood Lamps Interior Universal Waste (UW) ~8 EA
Thermostat Triggers Interior Universal Waste (UW) ~4 EA Smoke Detectors Interior Low-Level Radioactive
Source ~12 EA
Exit Signs Interior Universal Waste
(UW)/Electronic Waste ~4 EA
HVAC Refrigerants Roof Mounted Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) ~4 Units
(No Labels)

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 iv

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CONTAMINANT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY1
HVAC Refrigerants Stage Mechanical Room Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 1 Unit
(No Labels)
HVAC Refrigerants Wall Unit, Office Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 1 Unit
(No Labels)
Notes:

SF = square feet LF = linear feet EA = each NAD = No Asbestos Detected NA = not accessible HVAC = heating, ventilation and air-conditioning UW = universal waste PCB = polychlorinated biphenyls ACM = Asbestos-Containing Material, Greater than 1% of asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), as defined by USEPA ACCM (<1%) = Asbestos-Containing Construction Material, found to contain trace asbestos (>0.1%, <1.0%) are subject to regulation by CAL/OSHA as ACCMs.

Lead-Based Paint = 1.00 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) via XRF or 0.5 wt % (or 5,000 parts per million, ppm) via paint chip sampling of lead or greater is present, as defined by 17 California Code of Regulations (CCR) 35001-36100.

Lead-Bearing Substances = Within Los Angeles County, any paint, varnish, lacquer, putty, plaster, or similar coating or structural material which contains lead or its compounds in excess of seven-tenths (0.7) of one milligram per square centimeter, when measured by a lead-detecting instrument approved by the director [such as an XRF].

Lead-Containing Surface Coatings = 0.10 to 0.99 mg/cm2 of lead present (8 California Code of Regulations [CCR] 1532.1). Within Los Angeles County an LCSC is less than 0.7 mg/ cm2 of lead. Contractor is responsible for employee exposure monitoring during abatement, demolition or disturbance of LCSCs. Refer to the XRF Lead Data Table (Appendix C) for building components and surface coatings considered LCSCs at the Project Site.
1 Order of Magnitude ESTIMATED Quantities and Locations. It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to verify quantities and locations of hazardous materials in the path of construction through site visits and contractual bid set documents, including, but not limited to all specifications, drawings, and addenda. Any discrepancies between the contractual bid set documents and site visits must be submitted in writing to the Owner or the Owner’s representative, PRIOR to bidding.
2 Materials for which laboratory analytical result is reported as “Trace” must be managed, abated, and disposed of following the SCAQMD, NESHAPS, and OSHA regulations applicable to materials containing >1.0% asbestos. Additional analysis by Point Count or TEM methodology is required to determine if the material is above or below the 1.0% threshold. Materials found to be below 1.0% asbestos are not regulated by SCAQMD or NESHAPS reducing notification, work practice, and disposal requirements, but are still regulated by Cal-OSHA per the requirements of 8 CCR 1529.
3 Materials which could not be easily accessed for testing or were not sampled due to building occupancy are ASSUMED to be asbestos containing and should be handled accordingly. Prior to any renovation, all assumed ACM materials which will be impacted should be sampled for verification of ACM content.
4 ACM Duct Insulation (Aircell) was found to be in damaged condition and debris was observed throughout the attic which will require approval of a Procedure 5 Work Plan by SCAQMD in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403 prior to abatement cleanup activities. Quantity listed only includes duct insulation, debris to be assessed as part of the Procedure 5 condition assessment.

Asbestos
Based on the asbestos survey results, asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), asbestos-containing construction materials (ACCMs) and ASSUMED ACMs are present at the Project Site.

All disturbance and/or removal operations of ACMs/ACCMs/Assumed ACMs must be performed by a Cal/OSHA registered and State licensed asbestos removal contractor in accordance with Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1529 (8 CCR 1529). Notification must be provided to Cal/OSHA 24 hours prior to commencing such activities in accordance with 8 CCR 5203. All disturbance and/or abatement operations should be under the direction of a California Certified Asbestos Consultant.

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 v
Should the removal of identified asbestos-containing materials involve at least 100 square feet then a 14 calendar day written notification to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in accordance with Rule 1403, and a 24 hour written notice to Cal/OSHA prior to the initiation of such activities are required.

Notification to employees and contractors working within the building should be made in accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, Section 25915 et.seq., and Proposition 65.

Lead
Based on the lead testing results, lead-based paints, lead bearing substances and/or lead-containing surface coatings are present at limited areas of the Project Site.

All activities involving potential and identified lead-containing surfaces should be performed in accordance with California Health & Safety Code sections 17920.10 and 10525, 10525.7, Title 8, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Section 1532.1. In addition, all activities involving identified lead-based paints (LBP) must be performed in accordance with Title 17, CCR, Division 1, Chapter 8, Sections 35001 through 36100, and 40 CFR 745 which proscribe the use of California Department of Public Health (CDPH) or Federal EPA certified firms, workers, work practices, and other requirements.

Written notification to Cal/OSHA must be accomplished should LBP activities involve equal to or more than 100 square feet or 100 linear feet of removal in accordance with the requirements of 8 CCR 1532.1. Written notification to CDPH may be required.

Any welding, cutting or heating of metal surfaces containing surface coatings should be conducted in accordance with 8 CCR 1537 Welding, Cutting, and Heating of Coated Metals. This standard requires surfaces covered with toxic preservatives, and in enclosed areas, be stripped of all toxic coatings for a distance of at least 4 inches, in all directions, from the area of heat application prior to the initiation of such heat application, or 8 CCR 1536 Ventilation Requirements for Welding, Brazing, and Cutting.

Universal Waste
Based on the limited universal waste inspection results, universal waste materials are present at the Project Site.

All potential and identified Universal Waste (UW) materials impacted by the work should be removed and recycled or disposed of in accordance with the UW guidelines established by the DTSC, as stated in 22 CCR Sections 66261.9 and 66273.1 thru 66273.90.

VISTA’s limited visual survey indicated that light fixtures with ballasts that may contain PCB oil are present.

However, due to the limited nature of the random spot checks, VISTA recommends that all ballasts be visually inspected, prior to disposal, to determine if they contain PCB’s. Those ballasts marked No PCB’s or PCB Free

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 vi
can be considered as such as should be treated as UW - electronic waste. All PCB-containing devices, including, but not limited to ballasts, should be removed or have the oils removed and properly handled, collected, stored, transported and recycled or disposed of by an approved recycling or disposal facility in accordance with the requirements of Title 22 CCR 67426.1. Devices containing ozone depleting chemicals, low-level radiation, and other hazardous chemicals should be collected, waste characterized, disposed or recycled according to all applicable rules and regulations.

Should materials similar to those identified in this report, or if other forms of suspect hazardous materials are discovered during work activities, maintenance personnel and/or contractors should be instructed to immediately cease work activities which may initiate an exposure episode, and notify the appropriate management personnel. All such materials should be assumed to be hazardous and handled accordingly until properly tested and assessed.

Respectfully Submitted,
Vista Environmental Consulting, Inc. Reviewed and Approved By:

Gena R. Digby Michael Cardone
Project Manager Project Manager
Cal/DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant #95-1631 Cal/DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant #01-3025 CDPH Lead Related Construction I/A #LRC-00004845 CDPH Lead Related Construction I/A #LRC-00007280

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 1 -

1.0 INTRODUCTION
At the request of the City of San Marino, Vista Environmental Consulting, Inc. (VISTA) performed a Limited (Comprehensive, Semi-Destructive) Hazardous Materials Survey of the San Marino Center Building located at 1800 Huntington Drive, City of San Marino, Los Angeles County, California (Project Site). The building is planned for future modernization/renovations at the Project Site.

The survey was performed to identify and sample accessible, suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), asbestos-containing construction materials (ACCMs) and representative building components for the presence of lead-based paints (LBPs)/lead-bearing substances (LBSs)/lead containing surface coatings (LCSCs), universal waste (UW) materials, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) containing devices, mechanical equipment & machines which contain ozone depleting chemicals and devices with low-level radioactive sources, that may be present within the building.

The purpose of this survey was to identify hazardous building materials prior to the planned modernization/renovations of the structures. Identified hazardous materials should be properly removed, waste characterized, and disposed prior to being impacted by any activities that may disturb the identified hazardous materials. The data provided in this report can assist all parties involved in this project make informed decisions with regards to regulatory compliance and the health and safety of their employees.

This survey included the following:
 Visible and accessible suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were recorded and assessed.  Samples were collected and analyzed of all identified accessible suspect building materials to determine asbestos content OR were assumed to be asbestos containing if not sampled.  Visible and accessible representative painted, coated building components and substrates were assessed and tested to determine the lead concentrations.  Visible and accessible materials commonly found in buildings which have the potential to have hazardous properties that are regulated were inventoried, but not sampled. These materials included:
o Universal Waste (UW) materials, such as non-incandescent lamps, batteries, mercurycontaining devices, and electronic waste; o Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) containing devices such as lamps, ballasts and hydraulic systems;
o Mechanical Equipment & Appliances which may contain ozone depleting chemicals, such as Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems, refrigerators, freezers, and water coolers/fountains;
o Devices which have low-levels of radioactivity such as smoke detectors (Americium241) and exit signs (Tritium).

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 2 -

1.1 Building Description
The San Marino Center is located in the City of San Marino, California and is planned for renovations of the structure in the near future.

The Project Site subject building is a one (1) story community center building with a partial 2nd floor which houses mechanical equipment and a couple offices built in the 1950’s. The building is constructed with a wood frame on a concrete slab. Exterior walls are finished with stucco and the multi-level roofing system is a combination of wood shingles and rolled-on asphalt capsheet roofing. Interior walls are a combination of plaster with button board and finished drywall/joint compound system; interior ceilings are a combination of plaster with button board, finished drywall/joint compound, and/or acoustic ceiling tiles/panels; interior floors are finished with ceramic tile, vinyl sheet flooring, vinyl floor tile, terrazzo or carpet. The heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) unit(s) are located on the roof and stage mechanical room with ducting present throughout the attic, which is accessible from the 2nd floor mezzanine and a wall unit within the office.

Most building materials were found to be in good condition with the exception of damaged ACM duct insulation (aircell) and debris which was found throughout the attic which will require clean up to be performed under an approved SCAQMD Procedure 5 Work Plan in accordance with SCAQMD, Rule 1403.

The northeast perimeter of the attic was inaccessible and may have additional suspect materials that were not identified during the survey. Damaged ACM duct insulation (aircell) was visually observed within the inaccessible areas of the attic. See maps for locations of inaccessible areas.

The survey performed was limited and semi-intrusive in nature, and did include limited, reasonable, semidestructive testing to identify and sample materials located beneath finishes and/or enclosed in wall voids, pipe chases, and the like. There is a possibility that additional hazardous materials may be encountered in inaccessible areas (e.g., interstitial wall, floor joist and ceiling spaces) during building renovation/demolition activities. Suspect hazardous materials encountered during renovation activities that have not been assessed and sampled either may be assumed to be hazardous and handled accordingly, or may be properly assessed and sampled to determine if they contain hazardous or regulated materials.

2.0 METHODOLOGY
The limited (comprehensive, semi-destructive) hazardous materials survey was performed on November 12 and 15, 2021 by Mr. Pete Kolesar and Mr. Eloy Acuna, under the direction of Ms. Gena Digby. Mr. Kolesar and Ms. Digby are a State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/DOSH) Certified Asbestos Consultants (CAC #’s 15-5543, 95-1631) and a California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Lead Related Construction Inspector/Assessors (#LRC-00007820, LRC-00004845). Mr. Acuna is a Certified Site Surveillance Technician (CSST #18-6186) and a California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Lead Related

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 3 -
Construction Sampling Technician (#LRC-00008422). Copies of consultant certifications are attached in Appendix D.

Materials similar to those in this report may be present in areas which were not accessed. VISTA made every reasonable effort to access these areas. Subsurface investigations were not proposed nor performed as part of these surveys.

2.1 Asbestos
The asbestos surveys were performed generally in accordance with the AHERA protocol (40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E) but modified to include exterior areas in preparation for construction activities. Visual identification was performed by assessing visible and accessible structural, architectural, and mechanical components for the presence of suspect ACM at the Project Site. Samples were generally taken from locations that are not visible to the general population, such as areas above ceiling or that already showed signs of damage.

The limited, ACM survey was performed in the following manner:
 Suspect ACM was categorized into homogeneous materials for the building. A homogeneous material is defined as being a surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material which is uniform in color and texture. It may also be additionally subcategorized using the date of installation, when available.
 A sampling scheme was developed based upon the location and quantity of the suspect homogeneous ACM. A rough order of magnitude estimate of each suspect homogenous ACM was calculated and recorded for future reference. A sampling scheme, including a specific number of samples per suspect homogeneous ACM, was calculated prior to sampling.  Sampling guidelines established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) were utilized for sampling each suspected homogeneous ACM.  Trained California asbestos certified personnel, using appropriate sampling tools and sterile leaktight containers, collected building materials that were suspected to contain ACM.  Each suspect ACM sample was collected and sealed in its container and appropriately labeled with a unique sample identification number and recorded on an asbestos bulk sampling log. Each log contains a chain-of-custody to assure the proper transition of the samples from VISTA to the analytical laboratory.
 Sampling tools were decontaminated, by using a clean wet cloth, between the collection of each suspect sample to prevent the possibility of cross contamination to subsequent suspect ACM samples.

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 4 -
Suspect ACM bulk samples were delivered under proper chain-of-custody protocol, to AQ Environmental Laboratories, LLC (AQ Labs) 1508 East 33rd Street, Signal Hill, California, 90755 (562.206.2770). AQ Labs is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP #500044-0) and the California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (Cal-ELAP #2823).

The samples were submitted for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) utilizing dispersion staining techniques in accordance with the EPA’s “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” U.S. EPA/600/R-93/116, Visual Area Estimate, dated July 1993 and adopted by the NVLAP as Test Method Code 18/A01.

2.2 Lead
Suspect lead-based paints (LBPs) and lead-bearing substances (LBSs) were identified via visual inspection.

Representative surface coatings and materials were tested utilizing an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) direct read spectrum analyzer device in accordance with the requirements of the manufacturer’s performance characteristics sheet (PCS) to evaluate lead levels. The device used was a NITON Corporation XRF Spectrum Analyzer, Model XLp- 300 A. This device is a solid-state detector optimized for lead L-shell and K-shell XRay detection and uses a 40 mCi 109Cd (1,480 Mbq) isotope for an excitation source.

This testing was a limited screening of paint for the purpose of characterizing the lead content in paint and coatings likely to be disturbed during work activities. For this purpose, XRF analysis was used to screen for lead levels and provides results that are generally representative of typical conditions but are not inclusive of all painted/coated surfaces present at the Project Site. This survey was not a surface by surface inspection as outlined in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing pursuant to Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992. This analytical data can be helpful in evaluation of lead-related environmental risks in general, but cannot be used to calculate worker exposures and is not a substitute for employee exposure monitoring or waste stream sampling.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) specifies that lead-based paint (LBP) is present when paint contains lead equal or greater than 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (by XRF) by area or

0.5 percent by weight or 5,000 parts per million.

For the purposes of this lead testing (based on the location of the Project Site) the Los Angeles County Health and Safety Code defines “dangerous levels of lead-bearing substances” as “any paint, varnish, lacquer, putty, plaster, or similar coating or structural material which contains lead or its compounds in excess of seven-tenths (0.7) of one milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2),” when measured by a lead-detecting instrument approved by the director [such as an XRF].

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 5 -
For purposes of this survey, and in accordance with Title 8 CCR, Section 1532.1 (8 CCR 1532.1) and Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, (17 CCR) Section 35001 et. seq. and Chapter 11 of the Los Angeles Health & Safety Code, the XRF measurement data results were interpreted as follows:

1. Positive results (lead-based paint/lead-bearing substance present) were determined when XRF measurements revealed a lead concentration of 0.7 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) or greater.

2. Positive results (lead detected) were determined when XRF measurements revealed a lead concentration of <0.7 mg/cm2 down to the analytical detection limit of the device. Due to the limitations of the XRF, materials with results 0.1 mg/cm2, or greater must be treated as lead-containing.

3. “No lead detected” was determined when XRF measurements did not reveal a lead concentration above the analytical detection limit of the direct read instrument sampling device.

Please review the information in the “Recommendations/Conclusions” section prior to any disturbance of materials noted as being negative or LCSC’s and for clarification regarding lead-related construction.

2.3 Devices with Potential Hazardous Materials
Devices with potential hazardous materials were visually identified during the survey walk through and their quantities were estimated and recorded. No attempt was made to disassemble all devices or sample suspect materials within the devices.

For example, fluorescent light fixtures must be presumed to contain Universal Waste lamps and ballasts which contain PCB oil or are electronic waste, pending removal and disassembly of each unit to determine explicit product specific information that proves otherwise.

Appliances, such as televisions, movable refrigerators, microwaves, etc. and telecommunication equipment such as telephone, intercom and internet were not surveyed because they are typically fixed assets and likely to be reused.

3.0 RESULTS

3.1 Asbestos
A total of 180 suspect ACM bulk samples were collected from the Project Site on November 12 and 15, 2021.

Samples were analyzed on a layer by layer basis for the determination of the presence of asbestos. Additionally, two suspect ACMs were assumed to contain asbestos.

The results of the bulk samples collected for asbestos, and analyzed by PLM, indicate that detectable concentrations of asbestos are present in the following materials or have been assumed to contain asbestos:

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 6 -

ID MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CAL/OSHA
CLASS
SCAQMD

CLASSIFICATION
A Plaster Ceiling Heavy Textured Northside of Building Class II 2 -Friable2
B Plaster Walls/Ceiling Smooth Finish Prominent Throughout Class II 2 Friable2
K Sink Undercoat Mastic Black Wash Room and Kitchen Class II Class I –
Non-Friable
P Window Pane Sealant Brown Interior Windows Class II2 Class I – Non-Friable2
BB Duct Mastic Gray Stage Mechanical Class II Class I – Non-Friable
DD Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic 9” Brown/Black Office and Storage Rooms Class II Class I – Non-Friable
HH Basecove/Mastic 4” Black (w/ white
paint)/Tan 2
nd Floor Restroom Class II Class I –
Non-Friable
KK Window Putty White/Tan Interior and Exterior Windows Class II Class I –
Non-Friable
PP Duct Insulation and Debris
(Aircell)
4 Gray, Corrugated
Paper
Attic,
(Assumed present in Wall Voids) Class I Friable
QQ Duct Registers (Aircell)
Gray, Corrugated
Paper Attic @ Vent Registers Class I Friable
C3 Roof Penetration Mastic White/Black Roof @ Penetrations Throughout Class II Class I –
Non-Friable
D3 Pitch Pocket Mastic White/Black South Roof Class II
Class I –
Non-Friable
G3 HVAC Base Sealant Gray/Black Roof @ Center Class II
Class I –
Non-Friable
H3 Asbestos Cement Pipes Gray, 4”, 12”, 8” Roof/Attic Class II Class I –
Non-Friable
J3 Roof Flashing Sealant White Roof, Above SE Storage Rooms Class II Class I –
Non-Friable
G
Mirror Mastic
(ASSUMED ACM)
Inaccessible /
Destructive Testing
Needed
@ Lobby and Restrooms Class II
3 Class I –
Non-Friable3
CC
Vibration Dampers
(ASSUMED ACM)
Inaccessible /
Destructive Testing
Needed
@ HVAC Class II3 Class I –
Non-Friable3
Notes:

NA = not applicable NAD = No Asbestos Detected
ACM = Asbestos-Containing Material, Greater than 1% of asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), as defined by USEPA ACCM (<1%) = Asbestos-Containing Construction Material, found to contain trace asbestos (>0.1%, <1.0%) are subject to regulation by CAL/OSHA as ACCMs.
1 Order of Magnitude ESTIMATED Quantities and Locations. It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to verify quantities and locations of hazardous materials in the path of construction through site visits and contractual bid set documents, including, but not limited to all specifications, drawings, and addenda. Any discrepancies between the contractual bid set documents and site visits must be submitted in writing to the Owner or the Owner’s representative, PRIOR to bidding. 2 Materials for which laboratory analytical result is reported as “Trace” must be managed, abated, and disposed of following the SCAQMD, NESHAPS, and OSHA regulations applicable to materials containing >1.0% asbestos. Additional analysis by Point Count or TEM methodology is required to determine if the material is above or below the 1.0% threshold. Materials found to be below 1.0% asbestos are not regulated by SCAQMD or NESHAPS reducing notification, work practice, and disposal requirements, but are still regulated by Cal-OSHA per the requirements of 8 CCR 1529.

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 7 -
3 Materials which could not be easily accessed for testing or were not sampled due to building occupancy are ASSUMED to be asbestos containing and should be handled accordingly. Prior to any renovation, all assumed ACM materials which will be impacted should be sampled for verification of ACM content. 4 ACM Duct Insulation (Aircell) was found to be in damaged condition and debris was observed throughout the attic which will require approval of a Procedure 5 Work Plan by SCAQMD in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403 prior to abatement cleanup activities.

The results of the bulk samples collected for asbestos, and analyzed by PLM, indicate that ACMs/ACCMs are not present in the following materials:

ID MATERIAL DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF

SAMPLES
C Carpet Mastic Tan 3
D Brick Mortar Gray 3
E Ceiling Tile/Mastic 12” Brown, Fissured/Brown 3
F Base Cove/Mastic 4” Beige/Tan 3
H Base Cove/Mastic 4” Black/Tan 3
I Base Cove/Mastic 4” Brown/Brown 3
J Vinyl Floor Tile/Mastic 12” White Cross Pattern/Black 3 L Plaster Beige, Sand Finish 3
M Duct Mastic Tan 3
N Duct Insulation Yellow Fiberglass 1
O Ceiling Tile 12” White/Brown, Random Hole 3
Q Vinyl Sheet Flooring Tan, Pebble Pattern 3
R Wainscot Mastic Tan 3
S Vinyl Floor Tile/Mastic 12” White with Green Specks/Tan 3 T Base Cove/Mastic 6” Green/Tan 3
U Terrazzo Orange 3
V Terrazzo Green 3
W Ceiling Panel 2’x4’ White/Beige, Fissured 3
X Stage Curtain Blue 3
Y Vinyl Floor Tile 12” White, Self-Adhesive 3
Z Wallpaper Flower Pattern, Self-Adhesive 3
AA Thermal Systems Insulation – Elbow Gray, Hardpack 3

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 8 -

ID MATERIAL DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF

SAMPLES
EE Vinyl Floor Tile/Mastic 9” Tan Diamond Pattern, Green/Black 3 FF Ceramic Tile Grout White 3
GG Vinyl Floor Tile/Mastic 12” Beige/Black 3
II Roofing Debris Black 3
JJ Ceiling Tile 12” Random Hole, Splined 3
LL Stucco Gray, Sand Finish 7
MM Button Board Pink/Brown, Behind Plaster Walls & Ceiling 3 NN Wood Shingle Paper Black 3
OO Duct Mastic Gray 3
RR Barrier Paper Black 3
SS Pin Board Brown 3
TT Thermal Systems Insulation 4” Pipe Run, Black/Yellow, Fiberglass 1 UU Duct Insulation White Fiberglass with Foil 1
VV Duct Insulation Pink Fiberglass with Black Plastic 1 WW Duct Insulation Pink Fiberglass with Gray Plastic 1
XX Asphalt Black 1
YY Concrete Gray 3
ZZ Wallboard/Joint Compound Smooth Finish 3
A3 Roof Membrane White/Black, Cap Sheet 4
B3 Roof Parapet White/Black, Cap Sheet 3
E3 Roof Duct Mastic Gray 3
F3 Roof Duct Mastic White 3
I3 Roof Membrane Black/Gray, Cap Sheet 3
K3 Chimney Flashing Sealant Gray 3

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 9 -

3.2 Lead
VISTA collected 309 XRF readings (including calibration readings) of paint and coatings from the Project Site building on November 15, 2021. The results for this testing indicate that the following building components and respective surface coatings do have lead concentrations defining them as Lead-Based Paint (LBP)/LeadBearing Substance (LBS) (per Los Angeles Health and Safety Code).

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CONTAMINANT RESULTS
(mg/cm2)
QUANITY1
Handrails Wood, Tan Stage Lead-bearing Substance 0.7 ~20 LF Handrails Metal, White/Black Vestibule and Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.4 – 1.8 ~140 LF Doors Wood, White/Beige Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.0 - 1.8 ~53 EA Door Frame Wood, Brown Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.2 ~21 LF Door Jambs Wood, White Interior Lead-bearing Substance 0.8 ~45 EA Doors w/Windows Wood, Beige Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.1 ~2 EA Window Sills Wood, Beige Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.3 ~110 LF Window Casings Wood, White/Beige Interior and Exterior Lead-based Paint 0.7 - 1.3 ~46 EA Window Casings Metal, White/Beige Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.2 - 1.6 ~121 LF Window Frame Wood, Brown Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.2 ~21 LF Window Frames Metal, White/Beige Exterior Lead-based Paint 0.7 - 1.0 ~121 EA Floor Drains Metal, Brass Restrooms Lead-based Paint 2.6 ~2 EA Wall/Floor Tiles Ceramic, Tan 2nd Floor Restroom Lead-based Paint 6.3 ~80 SF Beam Brackets Metal, Beige Throughout Lead-based Paint 1.4 Not Quantified Wall Fan Décor Metal, White Dining Room Lead-based Paint 3.0 ~1 EA Chandeliers Metal, White Dining Room Lead-based Paint 3.4 ~15 EA Overhang Posts Metal, Brown/Beige Exterior Lead-based Paint 1.7 - 1.9 ~255 LF Downspouts Metal, White Exterior Lead-bearing Substance 0.7 ~92 LF Flashing Metal, Beige Exterior Lead-bearing Substance 0.7 ~400 LF Fascia Wood, Beige Exterior Lead-based Paint 0.9 - 1.4 ~400 LF LCSCs Detected (See XRF Lead Data Table)
Notes:

SF = square feet LF = linear feet EA = each NA = not applicable Lead-Based Paint = 1.00 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) via XRF or 0.5 wt % (or 5,000 parts per million, ppm) via paint chip sampling of lead or greater is present, as defined by 17 California Code of Regulations (CCR) 35001-36100.

Lead-Bearing Substances = Within Los Angeles County, any paint, varnish, lacquer, putty, plaster, or similar coating or structural material which contains lead or its compounds in excess of seven-tenths (0.7) of one milligram per square centimeter, when measured by a lead-detecting instrument approved by the director [such as an XRF].

Lead-Containing Surface Coatings = 0.10 to 0.99 mg/cm2 of lead present (8 California Code of Regulations [CCR] 1532.1). Within Los Angeles County an LCSC is less than 0.7 mg/ cm2 of lead. Refer to the XRF Lead Data Table (Appendix C) for building components and surface coatings considered LCSCs at the Project Site. Contractor is responsible for employee exposure monitoring during abatement, demolition or disturbance of LCSCs.

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 10 -
1 Order of Magnitude ESTIMATED Quantities and Locations. It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to verify quantities and locations of hazardous materials in the path of construction through site visits and contractual bid set documents, including, but not limited to all specifications, drawings, and addenda. Any discrepancies between the contractual bid set documents and site visits must be submitted in writing to the Owner or the Owner’s representative, PRIOR to bidding.

The XRF results for this survey indicate that some of the remaining building components and respective surface coatings have lead concentrations in excess of the level for compliance with trigger activities, as defined in 8 CCR 1532.1.

Refer to the Recommendations Section below for clarification regarding lead related construction.

Analytical laboratory data, chain of custody documents, XRF data and field sketches including sample location maps are included in the appendices of this report. A copy of the CDPH Lead Hazard Evaluation Report (Form 8552) that was sent to CDPH is included in Appendix C.

3.3 Devices with Potential Hazardous Materials
Devices with potential hazardous materials were identified at the Project Site and are listed in the following table:

Universal Waste, Suspect PCBs/Electronic Ballasts, Devices with Suspect Ozone Depleting Chemicals

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CONTAMINANT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY1
Fluorescent Light Tubes Interior Universal Waste (UW) ~176 EA Fluorescent Light Tubes (Small) Interior Universal Waste (UW) ~16 EA Light Fixture Ballasts Interior Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)/Electronic Waste ~88 EA
Flood Lamps Exterior Universal Waste (UW) ~8 EA
Thermostat Triggers Interior Universal Waste (UW) ~4 EA Smoke Detectors Interior Low-Level Radioactive Source ~12 EA Exit Signs Interior Universal Waste
(UW)/Electronic Waste ~4 EA
HVAC Refrigerants Roof Mounted Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) ~4 Units
(No Labels)
HVAC Refrigerant Stage Mechanical Room Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 1 Unit
(No Labels)
HVAC Refrigerant Wall Unit, Office Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 1 Unit
(No Labels)

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 11 -

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Asbestos
Based on the limited asbestos survey results, asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), Assumed ACMs and asbestos-containing construction materials (ACCMs) are present at the Project Site.

Work performed during any activities that disturb the ACMs, ACCMs or ASSUMED ACMs identified in this report must be performed in compliance with the most recent edition of all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, standards, and codes governing abatement, transport, and disposal of asbestos-containing materials.

Materials encountered in the building that are not part of this report must be properly sampled for the content of asbestos or assumed to be asbestos containing prior to any disturbance.

All disturbance and/or removal operations of ACMs/ACCMs must be performed by a Cal/OSHA registered and State licensed asbestos removal contractor in accordance with Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1529 (8 CCR 1529). Notification must be provided to Cal/OSHA 24 hours prior to commencing such activities in accordance with 8 CCR 5203. All disturbance and/or abatement operations should be under the direction of a California Certified Asbestos Consultant.

Should the removal of identified asbestos-containing materials involve at least 100 square feet then a 14 calendar day written notification to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in accordance with Rule 1403, and a 24 hour written notice to Cal/OSHA prior to the initiation of such activities are required.

A Procedure 5 Work Plans is required to be approve by SCAQMD prior to clean-up of any disturbed ACM and debris in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403.

Notification to employees and contractors working within the building should be made in accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, Section 25915 et.seq., and Proposition 65.

4.2 Lead
Based on the limited lead testing results, lead-based paints, lead-bearing substances and lead-containing surface coatings are present at the Project Site.

Written notification to Cal/OSHA must be accomplished should LBP activities involve equal to or more than 100 square feet or 100 linear feet of removal in accordance with the requirements of 8 CCR 1532.1. Written notification to CDPH may be required.

At present there is no state or federal regulation requiring mandatory lead removal or abatement prior to disturbance of building materials with identified lead paint or coatings. However, there are applicable Cal/OSHA worker protection and training requirements, Cal/EPA waste disposal requirements, CDPH

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 12 -
requirements for public and residential buildings, Federal EPA requirements for residential buildings and child occupied facilities, and SB 460 lead hazard regulations that apply to lead-related construction activities, abatement activities and their associated wastes. The following is a brief discussion and summary of applicable regulatory requirements:
♦ Cal/OSHA: Title 8, California Code of Regulation (CCR), Section 1532.1 (8 CCR 1532.1) governs occupational exposure to lead. This regulation requires that prior to initiation of certain activities, referred to as “trigger tasks”, workers must be trained, medically evaluated, and properly fitted with respiratory protection, and protective clothing until statistically reliable personal eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) results indicate lead exposure levels below the Personal Exposure Limit (PEL) for each unique task which disturbs lead-based and lead-containing coatings. This process is known as a Negative Exposure Assessment or NEA.

If the result of the exposure assessment is above the Action Level (AL) additional monitoring is required and if the result is above the PEL additional exposure monitoring, worker protection (including respirator protection and PPE), training and medical requirements apply. However even where the NEA criteria is met, certain hazard communication training and work practice controls still apply where lead is disturbed. “Trigger tasks” are tasks that are assumed to exceed the PEL pending an exposure assessment and they encompass the majority of construction activities that disturb surface coatings. Examples of “trigger” tasks range from manual paint scraping as a lower expected exposure up to hot work and abrasive blasting as the highest expected exposures, and include any non-listed task that the employer determines may potentially expose employees to lead levels above the AL.
“OSHA does not consider any method that relies solely on the analysis of bulk materials or surface content of lead (or other toxic material) to be acceptable for safely predicting employee exposure to airborne contaminates. Without air monitoring results or without the benefit of historical or objective data (including air sampling which clearly demonstrates that the employee cannot be exposed above the action level during any process, operation, or activity) the analysis of bulk or surface samples cannot be used to determine employee exposure.”- OSHA Standard Interpretation May 8, 2000.

OSHA states that these rules apply to “any detectable concentration of lead” without a specified detection level.

Due to the Consumer Product Safety Commission currently allowing paint to contain up to 90 parts per million (ppm) or 0.009 wt% of lead, the variation of lead content due to aging and weathering, and the variation of detection limits associated with analysis of bulk materials, such as paint chips and surface content analysis via XRF, it is recommended that all painted or coated surfaces be treated as potentially containing lead. Positive analytical results by either method can be used to indicate that detectable lead is present but negative results cannot be interpreted as conclusively demonstrating the absence of lead. Analytical data from analysis of bulk materials or surface content of lead can be helpful in evaluation of lead-related environmental risks in general but cannot be used to calculate worker exposures and are not a substitute for employee exposure monitoring.

As a result of the above, any employee that works around potential lead-based or lead-containing coatings must have HAZCOM training and personal exposure air monitoring is additionally required for employees that

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 13 -
disturb such coatings. Significant additional certification, notification, and work practices are required for materials found to be lead-based.

Any welding, cutting or heating of metal surfaces containing surface coatings should be conducted in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.354 and 8 CCR 1537. These regulations require surfaces covered with toxic preservatives, and in enclosed areas, be stripped of all toxic coatings for a distance of at least 4 inches, in all directions, from the area of heat application prior to the initiation of such heat application. ♦ Federal EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule 40 CFR 745: Effective April 22, 2010 this rule covers all non-abatement renovation, repair or painting work in pre-1978 child occupied facilities and housing. Work which disturbs more than 6 square feet per room, or 20 square feet per exterior, of paint or other surface coatings that contain lead in concentrations equal to or in excess of 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5% by weight are covered by this rule. Paint or surface coatings, in pre-1978 child occupied facilities and housing, that have not been tested, or were tested using non-approved methods are also covered under this rule.

Renovation, remodeling, painting, window replacement, plumbing, electrical work, heating & air-conditioning, demolition, plus work performed by trades like carpenters, electricians and handymen are all covered under this rule. The rule applies to persons working for rental property owners, schools, day care providers, non-profits and governmental agencies. These regulations require notifications to owners & tenants, special training, certifications (for both companies & individuals), work practices, and clearance verification for such activities. ♦ Cal/EPA through the Division of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) regulates disposal of lead hazardous waste (22 CCR Division 4.5, Minimum Standards for Management of Hazardous and Extremely Hazardous Wastes).

DTSC has issued guidance indicating that architectural debris with intact lead paint is normally expected to be handled as general construction waste. However, waste stream segregation and analysis is still required for all lead painted or coated debris regardless of if the paint or coating is intact on a building component or not. The resulting wastes may be hazardous under California and federal RCRA standards for lead and therefore require proper handling, packaging, labeling, and transportation under a proper manifest to a permitted hazardous waste storage, treatment and disposal facility.
♦ CDPH: The Department of Public Health (CDPH) has specific requirements (Title 17 Sections 35001 thru 36100 et. al.) for hazard assessment and work in public or residential structures in regards to lead-based paint.

These regulations require special certifications, work practices, and notification for such activities. ♦ Senate Bill 460 (SB 460): An act to amend Section 1941.1 of the Civil Code, and to amend Sections 17961, 17980, and 124130 of, and to add Sections 17920.10, 105251, 105252, 105253, 105254, 105255, 105256, and 105257 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to lead abatement. This bill allows for fines and criminal penalties to be levied on any person who is found to have performed lead abatement without containment or created a measurable “lead hazard” based upon current CDPH standards. A “lead hazard” means deteriorated lead-based paint, lead contaminated dust, lead contaminated soil, disturbing lead-based paint or presumed leadbased paint without containment, or any other nuisance which may result in persistent and quantifiable lead

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 14 -
exposure. VISTA recommends that all parties who come into contact with paint or soil that have detectable lead concentrations follow all applicable federal, state and local regulations relating to employee health and safety and proper disposal of generated wastes.

4.3 Devices with Potential Hazardous Materials
Based on the limited universal waste inspection results, universal waste materials are present at limited areas of the Project Site.

All potential and identified Universal Waste materials (UW) impacted by the work should be removed and recycled or disposed of in accordance with the UW guidelines established by the DTSC, as stated in 22 CCR Sections 66261.9 and 66273.1 thru 66273.90.

VISTA’s limited visual survey indicated that light fixtures with ballasts that may contain PCB oil are present.

However, due to the limited nature of the random spot checks, VISTA recommends that all ballasts be visually inspected, prior to disposal, to determine if they contain PCB’s. Those ballasts marked No PCB’s or PCB Free can be considered as such as should be treated as UW - electronic waste. All PCB-containing devices, including, but not limited to ballasts, should be removed or have the oils removed and properly handled, collected, stored, transported and recycled or disposed of by an approved recycling or disposal facility in accordance with the requirements of Title 22 CCR 67426.1. Devices containing ozone depleting chemicals, low-level radiation, and other hazardous chemicals should be collected, waste characterized, disposed or recycled according to all applicable rules and regulations.

5.0 LIMITATIONS & EXCLUSIONS
VISTA’s scope of work was to perform a building-related hazardous materials survey prior to the planned modernization/renovations of the building. Subsurface investigations were not accomplished as part of this scope of work. Quantities and locations are based upon areas that were accessed. Materials similar to those in this report may be present in areas which were not accessed. Because of this VISTA recommends including line item pricing, allowances, and/or additive/deductive wording to bid sheets for unforeseen conditions.

All material quantities reported herein are rough order of magnitude estimates and should not be used for bidding purposes. All contractors are responsible for accurately determining quantities and locations of materials identified in this report.

Findings, conclusions, recommendations and analytical data offered in this report have been derived from reviewing existing information provided by the client, visual survey of the building materials and systems, and the outcome of sampling and analysis of suspected hazardous materials.

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 15 -
Should materials similar to those identified in this report, or if other forms of suspect hazardous materials are discovered during work activities, maintenance personnel and/or contractors should be instructed to immediately cease work activities which may initiate an exposure episode, and notify the appropriate management personnel. All such materials should be assumed to be hazardous and handled accordingly until properly tested and assessed.

Respectfully Submitted,
Vista Environmental Consulting, Inc. Reviewed and Approved By:

Gena R. Digby Michael Cardone
Project Manager Project Manager
Cal/DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant #95-1631 Cal/DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant #01-3025 CDPH Lead Related Construction I/A #LRC-00004845 CDPH Lead Related Construction I/A #LRC-00007280 Attachments:

A – Sample Location Maps
B – Asbestos Laboratory Results
C – Lead XRF Data & CDPH Form 8552
D – Consultant Certifications
E – Photo Log (Damaged ACM and Debris)

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 17 -
Attachment A:

Sample Location Maps

Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey November 29, 2021 City of San Marino, San Marino Center Vista Project No. 212206001 - 18 -
Attachment B:

Asbestos Laboratory Results

Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Plaster, Heavy Text Ceiling, White,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Lobby
1800-A-1 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Perlite
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
30%
40%
15%
15%
2146585-001
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Heavy Text Ceiling, Beige,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Fireside Room
1800-A-2 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Perlite
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
30%
40%
20%
10%
2146585-002
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Heavy Text Ceiling, Beige,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Lobby
1800-A-3 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Perlite
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
35%
40%
15%
10%
2146585-003
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Heavy Text Ceiling, Beige,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Fireside Room
1800-A-4 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Perlite
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
30%
40%
20%
10%
2146585-004
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Heavy Text Ceiling, Beige,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Fireside Room
1800-A-5 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Perlite
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
30%
45%
15%
10%
2146585-005
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Page
PAGE:
134
1 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Plaster, Smooth Finish Wall,
Green/Beige, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Auditorium West Wall
1800-B-1 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
35%
40%
25%
2146585-006
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Smooth Finish Wall,
Green/Beige, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
1F Dining East
1800-B-2 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
35%
40%
25%
2146585-007
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Smooth Finish Wall,
Green/Beige, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Storage Wall North
1800-B-3 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
35%
40%
25%
2146585-008
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Smooth Finish Wall, Jute Fiber
Green/White/Beige, Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
2F Stair Landing
1800-B-4 LAYER 1 <1% <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Gypsum
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
15%
30%
40%
15%
2146585-009
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Smooth Finish Wall, Jute Fiber
Green/Beige, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Stage Ceiling
1800-B-5 LAYER 1 <1% <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Gypsum
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
15%
30%
40%
15%
2146585-010
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Page
PAGE:
135
2 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Plaster, Smooth Finish Wall, Jute Fiber
Green/Beige, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
WRR Ceiling
1800-B-6 LAYER 1 <1% <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Gypsum
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
15%
30%
40%
15%
2146585-011
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Plaster, Smooth Finish Wall, Jute Fiber
Green/Beige, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Lobby Service Rm
1800-B-7 LAYER 1 <1% <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Gypsum
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
15%
30%
40%
15%
2146585-012
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% Carpet Mastic, Tan, Non- Synthetic Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
Fireside Rm
1800-C-1 LAYER 1 20%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 80%
2146585-013
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Synthetic Fiber
Cellulose Fiber
Carpet Mastic, Tan, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
2F Data Rm
1800-C-2 LAYER 1 20%
5%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 75%
2146585-014
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Synthetic Fiber
Cellulose Fiber
Carpet Mastic, Tan, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Fireside Rm
1800-C-3 LAYER 1 15%
5%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 80%
2146585-015
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
136
3 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
LAYER 1
Brick, Red, Homogeneous
None Detected
Fireside Rm
1800-D-1 LAYER 1
Quartz
Mineral Binders/Filler
50%
50%
2146585-016
100%
LAYER 2
Mortar, Gray, Non-homogeneous
LAYER 2 None Detected
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
25%
50%
25%
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

LAYER 1
Brick, Red, Homogeneous
None Detected
Fireside Rm
1800-D-2 LAYER 1
Quartz
Mineral Binders/Filler
50%
50%
2146585-017
100%
LAYER 2
Mortar, Gray, Non-homogeneous
LAYER 2 None Detected
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
25%
50%
25%
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

LAYER 1
Brick, Red, Homogeneous
None Detected
Fireside Rm
1800-D-3 LAYER 1
Quartz
Mineral Binders/Filler
50%
50%
2146585-018
100%
LAYER 2
Mortar, Gray, Non-homogeneous
LAYER 2 None Detected
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
25%
50%
25%
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mineral Wool
Cellulose Fiber
CT, 1x1 Fissured, White/Gray, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Auditorium SW
1800-E-1A LAYER 1 75%
15%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-019
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
137
4 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Brown, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Auditorium SW
1800-E-1B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-020
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mineral Wool
Cellulose Fiber
CT, 1x1 Fissured, White/Gray, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Dining
1800-E-2A LAYER 1 75%
15%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-021
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Brown, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Dining
1800-E-2B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-022
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mineral Wool
Cellulose Fiber
CT, 1x1 Fissured, White/Gray, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Lobby
1800-E-3A LAYER 1 75%
15%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-023
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Brown, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Lobby
1800-E-3B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-024
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
Lobby
1800-F-1A LAYER 1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 100%
2146585-025
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
138
5 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
Lobby
1800-F-1B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-026
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
Stage W. Door
1800-F-2A LAYER 1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 100%
2146585-027
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Stage W. Door
1800-F-2B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-028
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
Dining SE
1800-F-3A LAYER 1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 100%
2146585-029
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Dining SE
1800-F-3B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-030
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Black, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-H-1A LAYER 1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 100%
2146585-031
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
139
6 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected
Kitchen
1800-H-1B LAYER 1 <1%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-032
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Black, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-H-2A LAYER 1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 100%
2146585-033
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected
Kitchen
1800-H-2B LAYER 1 <1%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-034
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Black, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-H-3A LAYER 1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 100%
2146585-035
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Non-homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Kitchen
1800-H-3B LAYER 1 <1%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-036
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
N. Hall
1800-I-1A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
40%
60%
2146585-037
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
140
7 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
N. Hall
1800-I-1B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-038
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen RR
1800-I-2A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
40%
60%
2146585-039
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen RR
1800-I-2B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-040
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
Vestibule
1800-I-3A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
40%
60%
2146585-041
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
Vestibule
1800-I-3B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-042
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cross Pattern VFT, 12", White, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Wash Room
1800-J-1A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-043
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
141
8 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Black, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Wash Room
1800-J-1B LAYER 1
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 100%
2146585-044
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cross Pattern VFT, 12", White, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Wash Room
1800-J-2A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-045
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Black, Non-homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Wash Room
1800-J-2B LAYER 1 <1%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 100%
2146585-046
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cross Pattern VFT, 12", White, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Wash Room
1800-J-3A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-047
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Black, Non-homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Wash Room
1800-J-3B LAYER 1 <1%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 100%
2146585-048
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

SUCM, Black, Homogeneous Chrysotile
Wash Room
1800-K-1 LAYER 1 3%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 97%
2146585-049
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 97.0% Total %Asbestos: 3.0% SUCM, Black, Homogeneous Chrysotile
Kitchen
1800-K-2 LAYER 1 3%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 97%
2146585-050
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 97.0% Total %Asbestos: 3.0% Page
PAGE:
142
9 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
SUCM, Black, Homogeneous Chrysotile
Kitchen
1800-K-3 LAYER 1 4%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 96%
2146585-051
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 96.0% Total %Asbestos: 4.0% Plaster, Sand Finish, Beige, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Mechanical
1800-L-1 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
25%
50%
25%
2146585-052
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Plaster, Sand Finish, Beige, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Storage 3
1800-L-2 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
25%
50%
25%
2146585-053
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Plaster, Sand Finish, Beige, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Data Room
1800-L-3 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
25%
50%
25%
2146585-054
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous Wood Fiber None Detected
Mechanical
1800-M-1 LAYER 1 35%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 65%
2146585-055
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous Wood Fiber None Detected
Mechanical
1800-M-2 LAYER 1 35%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 65%
2146585-056
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
143
10 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Wood Fiber
Fibrous Glass
Duct Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
Mechanical
1800-M-3 LAYER 1 35%
<1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 65%
2146585-057
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Insulation, Fiberglass, Yellow, Fibrous Glass
Homogeneous
None Detected
Mechanical
1800-N-1 LAYER 1 100%
2146585-058
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

CT, 1x1 Random Hole, White/Brown, Wood Fiber
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Kitchen
1800-O-1A LAYER 1 90%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-059
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Brown, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-O-1B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-060
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

CT, 1x1 Random Hole, White/Brown, Wood Fiber
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Kitchen
1800-O-2A LAYER 1 90%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-061
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Brown, Non-homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-O-2B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-062
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
144
11 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
CT, 1x1 Random Hole, White/Brown, Wood Fiber
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Kitchen
1800-O-3A LAYER 1 90%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-063
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-O-3B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-064
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Interior Window Pane Sealant, White,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Fireside
1800-P-1 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
85%
15%
2146585-065
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Interior Window Pane Sealant, White,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Kitchen
1800-P-2 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
85%
15%
2146585-066
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Interior Window Pane Sealant, Brown,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Vestibule
1800-P-3 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
80%
20%
2146585-067
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos: <1% VSF, Pebble Pattern, Tan, Non- Cellulose Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
MRR
1800-Q-1 LAYER 1 15%
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 85%
2146585-068
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
145
12 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
VSF, Pebble Pattern, Tan, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
MRR
1800-Q-2 LAYER 1 15%
<1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 85%
2146585-069
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
VSF, Pebble Pattern, Tan, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
MRR
1800-Q-3 LAYER 1 5%
<1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 95%
2146585-070
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Wainscot Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-R-1 LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-071
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Wainscot Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-R-2 LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-072
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Wainscot Mastic, Cream,
Homogeneous
None Detected
MRR
1800-R-3 LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-073
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 12", White w/ Green Specks,
Homogeneous
None Detected
WRR
1800-S-1A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-074
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
146
13 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-S-1B LAYER 1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 100%
2146585-075
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 12", White w/ Green Specks,
Homogeneous
None Detected
WRR
1800-S-2A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-076
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-S-2B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-077
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 12", White w/ Green Specks,
Homogeneous
None Detected
WRR
1800-S-3A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/Filler
60%
40%
2146585-078
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Non-homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-S-3B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-079
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 6", Green, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-T-1A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
40%
60%
2146585-080
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
147
14 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-T-1B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-081
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 6", Green, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-T-2A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
40%
60%
2146585-082
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-T-2B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-083
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 6", Green, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-T-3A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
40%
60%
2146585-084
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Tan, Homogeneous None Detected
WRR
1800-T-3B LAYER 1
Adhesive Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-085
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Terrazo, Beige/Orange/Green, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
WRR
1800-U-1 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
85%
15%
2146585-086
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
148
15 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Terrazo, Beige/Orange/Green, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
WRR
1800-U-2 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
85%
15%
2146585-087
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Terrazo, Beige/Orange/Green, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
WRR
1800-U-3 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
85%
15%
2146585-088
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Terrazo, Green, Non-homogeneous Fibrous Talc None Detected WRR
1800-V-1 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
85%
15%
2146585-089
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Terrazo, Green, Non-homogeneous Fibrous Talc None Detected WRR
1800-V-2 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
85%
15%
2146585-090
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Terrazo, Green, Non-homogeneous Fibrous Talc None Detected WRR
1800-V-3 LAYER 1 <1%
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
85%
15%
2146585-091
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Mineral Wool
CP, 2x4 Fissured, White/ Beige, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Dining N.
1800-W-1 LAYER 1 30%
15%
Perlite
Binder/Filler
50%
5%
2146585-092
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
149
16 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Cellulose Fiber
Mineral Wool
CP, 2x4 Fissured, White/ Beige, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Auditorium SW
1800-W-2 LAYER 1 30%
15%
Perlite
Binder/Filler
50%
5%
2146585-093
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Mineral Wool
CP, 2x4 Fissured, White/ Beige, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Dining NE
1800-W-3 LAYER 1 30%
15%
Perlite
Binder/Filler
50%
5%
2146585-094
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stage Curtain, Purple, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Stage
1800-X-1 LAYER 1 100%
2146585-095
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stage Curtain, Purple, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Stage
1800-X-2 LAYER 1 100%
2146585-096
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stage Curtain, Purple, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Stage
1800-X-3 LAYER 1 100%
2146585-097
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 12" Self Adhesive, White, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Stage RR
1800-Y-1 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-098
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
150
17 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
VFT, 12" Self Adhesive, White, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Stage RR
1800-Y-2 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-099
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 12" Self Adhesive, White, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Stage RR
1800-Y-3 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder/ Filler
60%
40%
2146585-100
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Flower Pattern Wallpaper, Self Cellulose Fiber
Adhesive, Beige/Green/Pink, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Dressing Room
1800-Z-1 LAYER 1 95%
Binder/Filler 5%
2146585-101
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Flower Pattern Wallpaper, Self Cellulose Fiber
Adhesive, Beige/Green/Pink, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Dressing Room
1800-Z-2 LAYER 1 95%
Binder/Filler 5%
2146585-102
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Flower Pattern Wallpaper, Self Cellulose Fiber
Adhesive, Beige/Green/Pink, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Dressing Room
1800-Z-3 LAYER 1 95%
Binder/Filler 5%
2146585-103
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

TSI, Hardpack Elbow, Gray, Mineral Wool
Homogeneous
None Detected
Stage Plenum Mechanical
1800-AA-1 LAYER 1 40%
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
40%
20%
2146585-104
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
151
18 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mineral Wool
Cellulose Fiber
TSI, Hardpack Elbow, Gray, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Stage Plenum Mechanical
1800-AA-2 LAYER 1 25%
30%
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
25%
20%
2146585-105
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mineral Wool
Cellulose Fiber
TSI, Hardpack Elbow, Gray, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Stage Plenum Mechanical
1800-AA-3 LAYER 1 25%
25%
Calcium Carbonate
Other Non-Fibrous Material
30%
20%
2146585-106
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Mastic, Gray, Non-homogeneous Chrysotile
Stage Mechanical
1800-BB-1 LAYER 1 2%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 98%
2146585-107
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 98.0% Total %Asbestos: 2.0% Duct Mastic, Gray, Non-homogeneous Chrysotile
Stage Mechanical
1800-BB-2 LAYER 1 2%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 98%
2146585-108
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 98.0% Total %Asbestos: 2.0% Duct Mastic, Gray, Non-homogeneous Chrysotile
Stage Mechanical
1800-BB-3 LAYER 1 2%
Adhesive Binders/Filler 98%
2146585-109
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 98.0% Total %Asbestos: 2.0% VFT, 9", Brown, Homogeneous Chrysotile
Storage 1
1800-DD-1A LAYER 1 20%
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 80%
2146585-110
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 80.0% Total %Asbestos: 20.0% Mastic, Black, Homogeneous Chrysotile
Storage 1
1800-DD-1B LAYER 1 2%
Bituminous Matrix 98%
2146585-111
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 98.0% Total %Asbestos: 2.0% Page
PAGE:
152
19 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
VFT, 9", Brown, Homogeneous Chrysotile
Storage 2
1800-DD-2A LAYER 1 20%
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 80%
2146585-112
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 80.0% Total %Asbestos: 20.0% Mastic, Black, Homogeneous Chrysotile
Storage 2
1800-DD-2B LAYER 1 3%
Bituminous Matrix 97%
2146585-113
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 97.0% Total %Asbestos: 3.0% VFT, 9", Brown, Homogeneous Chrysotile
NW Office
1800-DD-3A LAYER 1 20%
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 80%
2146585-114
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 80.0% Total %Asbestos: 20.0% Mastic, Black, Homogeneous Chrysotile
NW Office
1800-DD-3B LAYER 1 3%
Bituminous Matrix 97%
2146585-115
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 97.0% Total %Asbestos: 3.0% Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
VFT, 9" Diamond Pattern- Top, Tan,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-1A LAYER 1 25%
<1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 75%
2146585-116
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-1B LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-117
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 9" Diamond Pattern- Bottom, Cellulose Fiber
Green, Homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-1C LAYER 1 50%
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 50%
2146585-118
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
153
20 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Vapor Barrier w/ Mastic, Black/Brown, Cellulose Fiber
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-1D LAYER 1 40%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
50%
10%
2146585-119
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
VFT, 9" Diamond Pattern- Top, Tan,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-2A LAYER 1 25%
<1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 75%
2146585-120
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-2B LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-121
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 9" Diamond Pattern- Bottom, Cellulose Fiber
Green, Homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-2C LAYER 1 50%
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 50%
2146585-122
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Vapor Barrier w/ Mastic, Black/ Brown, Cellulose Fiber
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-2D LAYER 1 40%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
50%
10%
2146585-123
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
VFT, 9" Diamond Pattern- Top, Tan,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-3A LAYER 1 25%
<1
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 75%
2146585-124
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
154
21 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Mastic, Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-3B LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-125
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 9" Diamond Pattern- Bottom, Cellulose Fiber
Green, Homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-3C LAYER 1 50%
Vinyl Binder/ Filler 50%
2146585-126
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Vapor Barrier w/ Mastic, Black/ Brown, Cellulose Fiber
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-EE-3D LAYER 1 40%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
45%
15%
2146585-127
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Ceramic Tile Grout, White,
Homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-FF-1 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
85%
15%
2146585-128
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Ceramic Tile Grout, White,
Homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-FF-2 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
85%
15%
2146585-129
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Ceramic Tile Grout, White,
Homogeneous
None Detected
2F Bath
1800-FF-3 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
85%
15%
2146585-130
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
155
22 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
VFT, 12", Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
Auditorium by Stage
1800-GG-1A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder
40%
60%
2146585-131
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Black, Homogeneous None Detected
Auditorium by Stage
1800-GG-1B LAYER 1
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 100%
2146585-132
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 12", Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
Vestibule
1800-GG-2A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder
40%
60%
2146585-133
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Black, Homogeneous None Detected
Vestibule
1800-GG-2B LAYER 1
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 100%
2146585-134
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

VFT, 12", Beige, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-GG-3A LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder
40%
60%
2146585-135
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Mastic, Black, Homogeneous None Detected
Kitchen
1800-GG-3B LAYER 1
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 100%
2146585-136
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
156
23 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
BC, 4", Black (w/ white paint), Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
2F Bath
1800-HH-1A LAYER 1 8%
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder
25%
67%
2146585-137
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 92.0% Total %Asbestos: 8.0% Mastic,
Note: No Mastic Present
2F Bath
1800-HH-1B LAYER 1
2146585-138
100%
BC, 4", Black (w/ white paint), Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
2F Bath
1800-HH-2A LAYER 1 8%
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder
25%
67%
2146585-139
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 92.0% Total %Asbestos: 8.0% Mastic, Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
2F Bath
1800-HH-2B LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-140
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

BC, 4", Black (w/ white paint), Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
2F Bath
1800-HH-3A LAYER 1 8%
Calcium Carbonate
Vinyl Binder
25%
67%
2146585-141
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 92.0% Total %Asbestos: 8.0% Mastic, Brown, Homogeneous None Detected
2F Bath
1800-HH-3B LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-142
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
157
24 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Cellulose Fiber
Synthetic Fiber
Fibrous Glass
Roofing Debris, Black/Pink/Brown,
Non-homogeneous
Note: Qualitative Analysis
None Detected
Attic
1800-II-1 LAYER 1 Present
Present
Present
Quartz
Perlite
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
Present
Present
Present
Present
2146585-143
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Synthetic Fiber
Fibrous Glass
Roofing Debris, Black/Pink/Brown,
Non-homogeneous
Note: Qualitative Analysis
None Detected
Attic
1800-II-2 LAYER 1 Present
Present
Present
Bituminous Matrix
Quartz
Other Non-Fibrous Material
Present
Present
Present
2146585-144
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Synthetic Fiber
Fibrous Glass
Roofing Debris, Black/Pink/Brown,
Non-homogeneous
Note: Qualitative Analysis
None Detected
Attic
1800-II-3 LAYER 1 Present
Present
Present
Quartz
Perlite
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
Present
Present
Present
Present
2146585-145
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

CT, 1x1 Random Hole Splined, White/ Wood Fiber
Brown, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Office
1800-JJ-1 LAYER 1 90%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-146
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

CT, 1x1 Random Hole Splined, White/ Wood Fiber
Brown, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Office
1800-JJ-2 LAYER 1 90%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-147
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
158
25 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
CT, 1x1 Random Hole Splined, White/ Wood Fiber
Brown, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Office
1800-JJ-3 LAYER 1 90%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-148
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Window Putty, Int/Ext, Beige/Gray,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
WRR W.
1800-KK-1 LAYER 1
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
85%
15%
2146585-149
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Window Putty, Int/Ext, White/Tan, Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
Ext N.
1800-KK-2 LAYER 1 2%
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
78%
20%
2146585-150
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 98.0% Total %Asbestos: 2.0% Window Putty, Int/Ext, White/Tan, Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
Ext S.
1800-KK-3 LAYER 1 2%
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
78%
20%
2146585-151
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 98.0% Total %Asbestos: 2.0% Stucco, Sand Finish, Gray, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
SW Corner
1800-LL-1 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
50%
40%
10%
2146585-152
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stucco, Sand Finish, White/Pink/Gray,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
S. Ctr
1800-LL-2 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
40%
40%
20%
2146585-153
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
159
26 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Stucco, Sand Finish, White/Pink/Gray,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
East Ctr
1800-LL-3 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
40%
40%
20%
2146585-154
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stucco, Sand Finish, White/Pink/Gray,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
E. Entry
1800-LL-4 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
45%
40%
15%
2146585-155
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stucco, Sand Finish,
White/Brown/Gray, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Ext. Kitchen
1800-LL-5 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
45%
40%
15%
2146585-156
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stucco, Sand Finish, White/Pink/Gray, Fibrous Glass
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
NE Corner
1800-LL-6 LAYER 1 <1%
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
50%
35%
15%
2146585-157
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Stucco, Sand Finish, Beige/Gray, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
N. Entry
1800-LL-7 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
50%
40%
10%
2146585-158
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
160
27 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Cellulose Fiber
Wood Fiber
Button Board, Behind Plaster Walls &
Ceiling, Pink/Brown, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Attic
1800-MM-1 LAYER 1 10%
15%
Gypsum/Filler 75%
2146585-159
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Wood Fiber
Button Board, Behind Plaster Walls &
Ceiling, Pink/Brown, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Attic
1800-MM-2 LAYER 1 5%
10%
Gypsum/Filler 85%
2146585-160
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Wood Fiber
Button Board, Behind Plaster Walls &
Ceiling, Pink/Brown, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
Attic
1800-MM-3 LAYER 1 5%
10%
Gypsum/Filler 85%
2146585-161
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Wood Shingle Paper, Black, Cellulose Fiber
Homogeneous
None Detected
N. Canopy
1800-NN-1 LAYER 1 50%
Bituminous Matrix 50%
2146585-162
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Wood Shingle Paper, Black, Cellulose Fiber
Homogeneous
None Detected
NE Canopy
1800-NN-2 LAYER 1 50%
Bituminous Matrix 50%
2146585-163
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Wood Shingle Paper, Black, Cellulose Fiber
Homogeneous
None Detected
E. Ctr Canopy
1800-NN-3 LAYER 1 50%
Bituminous Matrix 50%
2146585-164
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
161
28 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Duct Mastic, Gray, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Attic
1800-OO-1 LAYER 1 10%
Organic Binders/Filler 90%
2146585-165
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Mastic, Gray, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Attic
1800-OO-2 LAYER 1 10%
Organic Binders/Filler 90%
2146585-166
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Mastic, Gray, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Attic
1800-OO-3 LAYER 1 10%
Organic Binders/Filler 90%
2146585-167
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Insulation, Aircell Corrugated Cellulose Fiber
Paper, Gray, Homogeneous
Chrysotile
Attic
1800-PP-1 LAYER 1 20% 50%
Binder/Filler 30%
2146585-168
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 50.0% Total %Asbestos: 50.0% Duct Insulation, Aircell Corrugated Cellulose Fiber
Paper, Gray, Homogeneous
Chrysotile
Attic
1800-PP-2 LAYER 1 20% 50%
Binder/Filler 30%
2146585-169
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 50.0% Total %Asbestos: 50.0% Duct Insulation, Aircell Corrugated Cellulose Fiber
Paper, Gray, Homogeneous
Chrysotile
Attic
1800-PP-3 LAYER 1 20% 50%
Binder/Filler 30%
2146585-170
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 50.0% Total %Asbestos: 50.0% Duct Register Insulation, Aircell Cellulose Fiber
Paper, Gray, Homogeneous
Chrysotile
Attic
1800-QQ-1 LAYER 1 10% 60%
Binder/Filler 40%
2146585-171
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 40.0% Total %Asbestos: 60.0% Page
PAGE:
162
29 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Duct Register Insulation, Aircell Cellulose Fiber
Paper, Gray, Homogeneous
Chrysotile
Attic
1800-QQ-2 LAYER 1 10% 60%
Binder/Filler 40%
2146585-172
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 40.0% Total %Asbestos: 60.0% Duct Register Insulation, Aircell Cellulose Fiber
Paper, Gray, Homogeneous
Chrysotile
Attic
1800-QQ-3 LAYER 1 10% 60%
Binder/Filler 40%
2146585-173
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 40.0% Total %Asbestos: 60.0% Barrier Paper, Black, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Attic
1800-RR-1 LAYER 1 60%
Bituminous Matrix 40%
2146585-174
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Barrier Paper, Black, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Attic
1800-RR-2 LAYER 1 60%
Bituminous Matrix 40%
2146585-175
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Barrier Paper, Black, Homogeneous Cellulose Fiber None Detected Attic
1800-RR-3 LAYER 1 60%
Bituminous Matrix 40%
2146585-176
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Pin Board, Brown, Non-homogeneous Jute Fiber None Detected Dining
1800-SS-1 LAYER 1 15%
Cork-like material 85%
2146585-177
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Pin Board, Brown, Non-homogeneous Jute Fiber None Detected Dining
1800-SS-2 LAYER 1 15%
Cork-like material 85%
2146585-178
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
163
30 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Pin Board, Brown, Non-homogeneous Jute Fiber None Detected Dining
1800-SS-3 LAYER 1 15%
Cork-like material 85%
2146585-179
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
TSI, 4" Fiberglass Run, Black/ Yellow,
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Stage Mechanical
1800-TT-1 LAYER 1 5%
88%
Bituminous Matrix
Metallic Sheet
5%
2%
2146585-180
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
Duct Insulation, F.G. w/ Foil,
White/Silver, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Attic
1800-UU-1 LAYER 1 8%
90%
Metallic Foil 2%
2146585-181
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Insulation, F.G. w/ Plastic, Fibrous Glass
Pink/Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Attic
1800-VV-1 LAYER 1 90%
Binder/Filler 10%
2146585-182
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Duct Insulation, F.G. w/ Plastic, Pink, Fibrous Glass
Homogeneous
None Detected
Attic
1800-WW-1 LAYER 1 100%
2146585-183
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Cellulose Fiber
Fibrous Glass
Asphalt, Black, Non-homogeneous None Detected
N. Entry
1800-XX-1 LAYER 1 <1%
<1
Bituminous Matrix
Mineral Aggregate
20%
80%
2146585-184
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
164
31 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Concrete, Gray/Red, Nonhomogeneous
None Detected
S. Lot
1800-YY-1 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
55%
35%
10%
2146585-185
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Concrete, Gray, Non-homogeneous None Detected
NE Entry
1800-YY-2 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
70%
30%
2146585-186
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Concrete, Gray, Non-homogeneous None Detected
N. Entry
1800-YY-3 LAYER 1
Quartz
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
50%
40%
10%
2146585-187
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

LAYER 1 Cellulose Fiber
WBJC, Wall Smooth Finish- WB,
White/ Brown, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
WRR
1800-ZZ-1 LAYER 1 20%
Gypsum/Filler 80%
2146585-188
70%
LAYER 2
JC, Beige/White, Non-homogeneous
LAYER 2 None Detected
Perlite
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
10%
75%
15%
30%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
165
32 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
LAYER 1 Cellulose Fiber
WBJC, Wall Smooth Finish- WB,
White/ Brown, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
MRR
1800-ZZ-2 LAYER 1 20%
Gypsum/Filler 80%
2146585-189
70%
LAYER 2
JC, Beige/White, Non-homogeneous
LAYER 2 None Detected
Perlite
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
10%
75%
15%
30%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

LAYER 1 Cellulose Fiber
WBJC, Wall Smooth Finish- WB,
White/ Brown, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Kitchen
1800-ZZ-3 LAYER 1 15%
Gypsum/Filler 85%
2146585-190
85%
LAYER 2
JC, Beige/White, Non-homogeneous
LAYER 2 None Detected
Perlite
Calcium Carbonate
Binder/Filler
2%
50%
48%
15%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Capsheet, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof N.
1800-A3-1A LAYER 1 50%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
40%
10%
2146585-191
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Felt (3 layers), Fibrous Glass
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof N.
1800-A3-1B LAYER 1 40%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 60%
2146585-192
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Tar, Black,
Homogeneous
None Detected
Roof N.
1800-A3-1C LAYER 1
Bituminous Matrix 100%
2146585-193
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
166
33 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Roof Membrane, Capsheet 1, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Ctr
1800-A3-2A LAYER 1 50%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
40%
10%
2146585-194
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Capsheet- 2, Gray/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Ctr
1800-A3-2B LAYER 1 35%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix/Filler
15%
50%
2146585-195
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Felt (3 layers), Fibrous Glass
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Ctr
1800-A3-2C LAYER 1 40%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 60%
2146585-196
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Capsheet 1, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Pitched
1800-A3-3A LAYER 1 60%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
25%
15%
2146585-197
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Capsheet 2, Gray/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Pitched
1800-A3-3B LAYER 1 40%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix
20%
40%
2146585-198
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Felt (3 layers), Fibrous Glass
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Pitched
1800-A3-3C LAYER 1 40%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 60%
2146585-199
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
167
34 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Roof Membrane, Capsheet, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Skylight
1800-A3-4A LAYER 1 70%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
20%
10%
2146585-200
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Comp. Roofing, Fibrous Glass
Gray/ Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Skylight
1800-A3-4B LAYER 1 10%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix/Filler
40%
50%
2146585-201
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Felt (3 layers), Fibrous Glass
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Skylight
1800-A3-4C LAYER 1 30%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 70%
2146585-202
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Parapet, Capsheet, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof SE
1800-B3-1A LAYER 1 60%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
30%
10%
2146585-203
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Parapet, Comp. Roofing, Gray/ Fibrous Glass
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof SE
1800-B3-1B LAYER 1 15%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix/Filler
30%
55%
2146585-204
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Parapet, Felt, Black, Fibrous Glass
Homogeneous
None Detected
Roof SE
1800-B3-1C LAYER 1 20%
Bituminous Matrix 80%
2146585-205
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
168
35 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Roof Parapet, Capsheet, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof West
1800-B3-2A LAYER 1 60%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
30%
10%
2146585-206
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Parapet, Comp. Roofing, Gray/ Fibrous Glass
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof West
1800-B3-2B LAYER 1 15%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix/Filler
30%
55%
2146585-207
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Parapet, Felt, Black, Non- Fibrous Glass
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof West
1800-B3-2C LAYER 1 20%
Bituminous Matrix 80%
2146585-208
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Parapet, Capsheet, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof N.
1800-B3-3A LAYER 1 40%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
30%
20%
10%
2146585-209
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Parapet, Felt/Tar, Black, Non- Fibrous Glass
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof N.
1800-B3-3B LAYER 1 15%
Bituminous Matrix 85%
2146585-210
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Penetration Mastic, White/
Black, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Roof NW
1800-C3-1 LAYER 1 5%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
75%
20%
2146585-211
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 95.0% Total %Asbestos: 5.0% Page
PAGE:
169
36 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Roof Penetration Mastic, White/
Black, Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Roof Ctr
1800-C3-2 LAYER 1 5%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
75%
20%
2146585-212
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 95.0% Total %Asbestos: 5.0% Roof Penetration Mastic, White/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof NE
1800-C3-3 LAYER 1 5%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
20%
75%
2146585-213
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Pitch Pocket Mastic, White/ Black,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Roof SW
1800-D3-1 LAYER 1 5%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
85%
10%
2146585-214
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 95.0% Total %Asbestos: 5.0% Pitch Pocket Mastic, White/ Black,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Roof S. Ctr
1800-D3-2 LAYER 1 5%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
85%
10%
2146585-215
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 95.0% Total %Asbestos: 5.0% Pitch Pocket Mastic, White/ Black, Synthetic Fiber
Non-homogeneous
None Detected
Roof SE
1800-D3-3 LAYER 1 5%
Bituminous Matrix
Binder/Filler
60%
35%
2146585-216
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Duct Mastic, Gray, Non- Cellulose Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Ctr
1800-E3-1 LAYER 1 30%
Binder/Filler 70%
2146585-217
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
170
37 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Roof Duct Mastic, Gray, Non- Cellulose Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Ctr
1800-E3-2 LAYER 1 30%
Binder/Filler 70%
2146585-218
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Duct Mastic, Gray, Non- Cellulose Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof Ctr
1800-E3-3 LAYER 1 15%
Binder/Filler 85%
2146585-219
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Duct Mastic, White, Non- Cellulose Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof SE
1800-F3-1 LAYER 1 20%
Binder/Filler 80%
2146585-220
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Duct Mastic, White, Non- Cellulose Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof SE
1800-F3-2 LAYER 1 20%
Binder/Filler 80%
2146585-221
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Duct Mastic, White, Non- Cellulose Fiber
homogeneous
None Detected
Roof SE
1800-F3-3 LAYER 1 20%
Binder/Filler 80%
2146585-222
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

HVAC Base Sealant, Gray/ Black,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Roof Ctr
1800-G3-1 LAYER 1 10%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 90%
2146585-223
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 90.0% Total %Asbestos: 10.0% HVAC Base Sealant, Gray/ Black,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Roof Ctr
1800-G3-2 LAYER 1 10%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 90%
2146585-224
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 90.0% Total %Asbestos: 10.0% Page
PAGE:
171
38 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
HVAC Base Sealant, Gray/ Black,
Non-homogeneous
Chrysotile
Roof Ctr
1800-G3-3 LAYER 1 10%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 90%
2146585-225
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 90.0% Total %Asbestos: 10.0% Cement Pipe, Gray, Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
Crocidolite
Roof NE
1800-H3-1 LAYER 1 10%
Binder/Filler 85% 5%
2146585-226
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 85.0% Total %Asbestos: 15.0% Roof Membrane, Capsheet, Gray/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-I3-1A LAYER 1 20%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix/Filler
25%
55%
2146585-227
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Felt Paper, Black, Fibrous Glass
Homogeneous
None Detected
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-I3-1B LAYER 1 30%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 70%
2146585-228
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Capsheet, Gray/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-I3-2A LAYER 1 20%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix/Filler
25%
55%
2146585-229
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Felt Paper, Black, Fibrous Glass
Homogeneous
None Detected
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-I3-2B LAYER 1 30%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 70%
2146585-230
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
172
39 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Roof Membrane, Capsheet, Gray/ Synthetic Fiber
Black, Non-homogeneous
None Detected
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-I3-3A LAYER 1 20%
Quartz/Gravel
Bituminous Matrix/Filler
25%
55%
2146585-231
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Membrane, Felt Paper, Black, Fibrous Glass
Homogeneous
None Detected
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-I3-3B LAYER 1 30%
Bituminous Matrix/Filler 70%
2146585-232
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Roof Flashing Sealant, White, Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-J3-1 LAYER 1 8%
Binder/Filler 92%
2146585-233
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 92.0% Total %Asbestos: 8.0% Roof Flashing Sealant, White, Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-J3-2 LAYER 1 8%
Binder/Filler 92%
2146585-234
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 92.0% Total %Asbestos: 8.0% Roof Flashing Sealant, White, Nonhomogeneous
Chrysotile
SE Storage Rm 3
1800-J3-3 LAYER 1 8%
Binder/Filler 92%
2146585-235
100%
Asbestos Present: Yes Total % Non-Asbestos: 92.0% Total %Asbestos: 8.0% Chimney Flashing Sealant, Gray,
Homogeneous
None Detected
Roof NE (Fireside Rm)
1800-K3-1 LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-236
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Chimney Flashing Sealant, Gray,
Homogeneous
None Detected
Roof NE (Fireside Rm)
1800-K3-2 LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-237
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Page
PAGE:
173
40 of
of 246
41 Layer No.

Layer %
Asbestos
Type
Non-Asbestos
Components
Test Report
Laboratory ID
Sample No.

Sample Location
Description (%) (%)
Method of Analysis
Gena Digby
1054 N Tustin Avenue
Anaheim CA 92807
Vista Environmental Consulting
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/17/2021
Date Analyzed
Date Reported
Date Received
Attn.:

Report Number 2146585
Project Number 212200601
San Marino Center
Project Name City of San Marino
WO Number
11/12/2021
Location
Date Sampled
Sampled By Acuna
PO Number
Total Samples 238
1508 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
Toll: 888-207-2022
Tel: 562-206-2770
Fax: 562-206-2773
40 CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020; updated method 600 R-93/116 Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.

L L C
Chimney Flashing Sealant, Gray,
Homogeneous
None Detected
Roof NE (Fireside Rm)
1800-K3-3 LAYER 1
Organic Binders/Filler 100%
2146585-238
100%
Asbestos Present: No No Asbestos
Detected
Total % Non-Asbestos: 100.0% Total %Asbestos:

Method Detection Limit: Less than one percent (<1%). Asbestos content has been determined using calibrated visual estimation (CVES). Samples tested were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise stated. Test report relates only to items tested. Non-homogeneous samples containing discrete and separable layers are analyzed and reported separately; composite results may be reported upon customer's request. Non-homogeneous samples with inseparable layers are analyzed and reported as composite samples. Due to the limitations of Polarized Light Microscopy, samples reported as None Detected or with low asbestos concentrations may not be reliable and further analysis such as TEM is recommended to confirm PLM results. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of this laboratory. This report may not be used by the customer to claim product certification, endorsement, or approval by NIST/NVLAP or any agency of the government. Samples shall be disposed according to local, state and federal laws, 30 days after results are reported unless otherwise instructed.

Approved Signatory Cristina E. Tabatt
Analysts: FDC (001-109), CET (110-238)

TESTING
NVLAP Lab Code 500044-0
CA-ELAP #2823
Analyst - Fred Chappelear
Page
PAGE:
174
41 of
of 246
41