San Marino City Council
June 26, 2026

2. QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE OF FIRM & KEY TEAM MEMBERS: (cont’d) TYPICAL SERVICES:

Working with numerous Southern California cities, HCI has been responsible for directing the activities of Traffic Divisions, providing expertise to City Engineering and Planning staffs, and responding to requests, inquiries and concerns of citizens and City Council members; typical of certain needs identified by the City of San Marino’s RFP for on-call traffic engineering services.

If desired, our overall services available to the City of San Marino include the following:
 Traffic signal design
 Signing and striping design
 Develop and implement traffic signal timing plans
 Develop, design and implement traffic signal coordination systems  Traffic management plans (traffic control plans)
 Warrant analyses for traffic control devices, such as traffic signals, Stop signs, crosswalks  Engineering and Traffic Surveys for establishing speed limits  Review of traffic impact analyses
 Remote and local (off-site/on-site) management of traffic signals  Review all proposed improvements, development, site and traffic management plans to ensure conformance with applicable standards (City, AASHTO, Cal. MUTCD, etc.)  Develop traffic-related conditions of approval for planning and development applications  Identify and prepare applications for public improvement funds/grants  Coordination of activities of our client cities’ traffic signal maintenance contractor  Contract City Traffic Engineering
 All other traffic-related impact reports, surveys and analyses From our office location, HCI also continuously operates eleven (11) agencies’ citywide traffic signal systems. The local agencies where HCI remotely operates and daily monitors the coordination timing for traffic signals are the following cities:
1) Aliso Viejo 5) Laguna Hills 9) Stanton
2) Cerritos 6) Moorpark 10) Tustin
3) Cypress 7) Rancho Santa Margarita 11) Yorba Linda
4) Indian Wells 8) San Juan Capistrano
PAGE 310 of 403
Proposal for Multi-Year Professional Services for the City of San Marino, CA

4. PROJECT APPROACH: (continued)
In careful review of the City’s RFP, we are providing our knowledge, skill sets, qualifications, and experience related to what is being sought in Category 1: On-Call Traffic Engineering Services (as listed below):

1. Design Engineering Services (Traffic Signal, Signal Interconnect Design Plans) HCI has extensive experience in the development of traffic engineering plans, such as new traffic signal, traffic signal modification, and signal interconnect as these are among our firm’s primary service products. Upon request by the City’s contract officer, HCI will generally begin a traffic design by completing a topographic field-review of the intersection/location. More specifically, HCI staff conducts a field review to verify existing equipment and/or document roadway features including curb, gutter, median alignments, sidewalks, driveways, catch basins, curb returns, bus and bicycle routes, signing and striping. HCI also reviews the project roadways and compares the layout drawings against existing field conditions. Potential conflicts between proposed improvements and underground/overhead utilities (other infrastructure) are investigated.

HCI then prepares a base design plan using AutoCAD for the project location. After incorporating all necessary utility data, a preliminary traffic plan is prepared that takes the existing and modified street and intersection geometries into consideration, along with other factors that may influence the design and/or operation of the system. Each plan includes necessary notes/specifications for applicable equipment removal and installation.

The majority of our traffic signal design work is designed in conformance with Sections 86 and 87 of the State of California (Caltrans) Specifications and Standard Plans, latest edition, and is compliant with the City’s most current signal design standards and technical provisions. The traffic plans generally include: General and construction notes, phase diagram, conductor, detector and pole schedules, and any other details necessary for construction.

The plans are typically prepared at 20-scale or 40-scale and plotted on ‘D’ size (24”x36”) full-size sheets with standard City title block. HCI usually provides a 60% and 90%-complete progress submittal of the preliminary traffic plans to the City for design review. Comments received during the City’s review are incorporated in a timely manner into the final 100% plan submittal.

Similarly, HCI has extensive experience in the development of signing and striping plans, signing/striping modification plans, and traffic control plans. For each of these types of plans, HCI includes applicable technical provisions and engineer’s estimates that complement each plan set providing complete PS&E ready for construction bidding on time and within the City’s approved schedule. All plans are prepared under our licensed Traffic and Civil Engineers.

PAGE 311 of 403
Proposal for Multi-Year Professional Services for the City of San Marino, CA

4. PROJECT APPROACH: (continued)

1. Design Engineering Services (Traffic Signal, Signal Interconnect, & ITS Design Plans) (cont’d) It is important to note, all of our engineering staff assigned to serve the City of San Marino have a thorough knowledge and proficiency in the local agency municipal codes, current State (Caltrans) standard plans and specifications, Highway Design Manual, Highway Capacity Manual, California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), policies and procedures for ADA regulations, traffic signal timing, traffic engineering modeling and methodologies, ITS, Federal/State/County/City funding, traffic standards and methodologies, and the State of California Vehicle Code.

Our team will provide the City with all materials and labor to perform the requested traffic engineering design services and conform to these standards. In addition to our technical expertise, our staff possesses the ability to effectively communicate in oral or written form and have no difficulty speaking before groups. HCI staff will attend City staff, City Council, Planning Commission, and any other extraordinary meetings or events, as needed and requested by City.

HCI staff does have the expertise to complete all traffic engineering services as listed in the City’s RFP, including cooperatively working with various agencies such as Caltrans and Los Angeles County.

2. Plan-Checking Services / Private Development Plan-Check HCI understands that the on-call professional engineering services that may be requested by the City’s contract officer may involve plan-check services for the consultant to provide on behalf of the City, in accordance with current Traffic Engineering and Traffic Operations principles and design requirements. As our firm specializes in providing traffic engineering services to local agencies, HCI staff have reviewed and plan-checked countless traffic plans over the past (29) years for numerous cities. As an approved consultant, upon request HCI will perform plan checks and reviews in accordance with any applicable City Design Manual, Standard Plans, Technical Provisions, Planning and Design Guidelines for Bicycle Facilities, and Transportation Guidelines, Caltrans Highway Design Manual, CA MUTCD, and the Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications.

HCI’s experience and expertise allows quick and complete site plan review for all types of traffic engineering applications, as well as certain civil applications, to determine conformance to traffic, parking, access, street and pavement, subdivision requirements, meetings with developers or contractors to resolve traffic issues.

Upon request, HCI staff will red-line a plan and/or render and remit a typed plan-check correction/clarification list (2 copies) to the Public Works Department/Engineering Division within (10) working days from notification by the City for a typical development project.

HCI’s traffic plan review check list is comprised of the following:

PAGE 312 of 403
Proposal for Multi-Year Professional Services for the City of San Marino, CA

4. PROJECT APPROACH: (continued)
If requested, our reviews conclude with developing detailed, project-specific Conditions of Approval for the City’s consideration. It is noted that many development-related services such as the review of street improvement or traffic signal plans are project specific and are treated as recoverable project costs. With our internet based tools and 12-person available staff, HCI is very capable of taking on and efficiently managing multiple design/review projects.

3. Other Traffic/Transportation Engineering Services, including Reports & Surveying Warrant Analyses/Reports
Our staff also prepares numerous warrant analysis and traffic operations reports every year for various city agencies, such as traffic signal warrants, left-turn phasing warrants, multi-way stop warrants, operational level-of-service (LOS), queuing analyses, flashing beacon warrants, traffic calming studies, traffic signal master plans, citywide Engineering and Traffic (E&T) surveys for speed limits, etc. Upon City request, HCI staff also completes field reviews for sight distance, order applicable vehicular and pedestrian count data, and quickly gathers, prepares, and analyzes SWITRS collision data (via i-SWITRS website), prepares exhibits, and develops reports for literally hundreds of traffic studies for our client cities.

Upon request by the City’s contract officer, HCI will also provide critical intersection calculations, as we do for several of our client city agencies on a bi-annual basis, for compliance with the region’s Congestion Management Program (CMP) and Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS). In regards to the CMP, HCI typically gathers peak-hour turning movement counts for the specified intersections, and applies these traffic volumes, number of lanes for each approach leg, and traffic signal timing to obtain an intersection LOS.

More specifically, HCI utilizes the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) or the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, as appropriate, to complete peak-hour intersection levelof-service (LOS) calculations. Typically, HCI uses the HCM methodology to determine LOS at traffic signalized intersections using the Synchro Traffic Signal software, unless the ICU methodology is specified. HCI then reviews the results, determines applicable deficiencies, and provides a recommendations report to the City for improving LOS to acceptable standards, such as additional lanes, protected left-turns, overlap phases, and signal timing.

Software
HCI uses state-of-the-art licensed AutoCAD software, as well as the Microsoft Office suite of programs, Synchro 11, and Adobe & Nitro PDF programs on our office computers. More specifically, our designers use the AutoCAD software for all of our design plan work, which typically include traffic signal plans (new or modification), signing and striping plans, signal interconnect plans, certain civil plans, and report exhibits. All of our staff’s computers use the Microsoft Office programs (including Excel, Word, Outlook, & Powerpoint, etc.) to complete various reports, memos, specifications, and estimates as part of the requested PS&E design work.

PAGE 313 of 403
Proposal for Multi-Year Professional Services for the City of San Marino, CA

4. PROJECT APPROACH: (continued)

3. Other Traffic/Transportation Engineering Services, including Reports & Surveying (cont’d) Software (cont’d)
In regards to Simulation/Modeling, our engineers use the Synchro program, as well as the latest Tru-Traffic time-space coordination timing software, for various timing development and evaluations, modeling and simulations. HCI is very familiar with Synchro, which uses the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for corridor timing development.

TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES:

It is noted, we are including an explanation of our on-going traffic signal monitoring support services for the City’s review. We understand these particular services are not needed or included in the RFP; however, they are provided as part of our experience information for the City’s consideration.

As mentioned, HCI currently manages the traffic signals and signal systems of (11) Southern California cities on a daily basis. Consequently, we have a very good understanding and are infinitely familiar with both the Econolite control equipment as well as the Centracs and Aries Traffic Management System softwares for traffic signal systems management. In regards to coordination timing and separate time-referencing devices, all signal controller time clocks that we manage are constantly updated through our Centracs and Aries Traffic Management softwares, which are always connected to the GPS time via internet.

HCI’s project-specific experience includes extensive knowledge on the local agency’s signal controllers. HCI staff continuously (daily) interfaces with the signal controllers in our client cities which currently use the Econolite ASC/2S, ASC/3, and the latest Cobalt system controllers, the ASC/2M master controllers, and managed by the Centracs and Aries Traffic Signal Management systems.

HCI staff’s “hands-on” traffic signal timing experience comprises all levels of timing applications, including timing input into signal system controllers manually and from our traffic signal management center through our licensed system software, designing and installing special “custom” traffic signal operational circuitry, and maintaining signal interconnect operations.

Our same team members have been working with several City staffs during the past several years in monitoring their City’s systems. In conjunction, HCI staff continues our on-going excellent relationships with most traffic signal, lighting, and signal maintenance contractors (and their technicians) including Econolite (Aegis), Siemens ITS, Crosstown/Computer Services Company (CSC), Bear Electric, St. Francis, as well as with Caltrans and the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside for any shared City/State or City/County intersections.

PAGE 314 of 403
Proposal for Multi-Year Professional Services for the City of San Marino, CA

4. PROJECT APPROACH: (continued)
Lastly, throughout the past years, HCI has maintained a good working relationship with Caltrans, as several projects have been implemented that successfully interfaced with freeway interchange traffic signal systems.

APPROACH:

The specific approach to our on-going traffic signal operations and timing management services that HCI provides to our client agencies includes the following:

HCI typically provides a Traffic Signal Systems Specialist for the monitoring support on all the City’s traffic signals. The Specialist sets up the Scheduled Operations on the Centracs or Aries Traffic Management systems specifically for our client City’s systems in order to automatically perform a variety of tasks. Specifically, the Centracs/Aries functions and Specialist’s time spent on these services include performing the following daily sub-tasks:

1. The Scheduled Operations automatically gather and store historical data and real-time information on all the City’s traffic signal operations programmed;

2. The data is reviewed daily to verify that all traffic signals are working properly;

3. Any malfunctions logged are immediately reported to the City’s designated traffic signal maintenance contractor, for dispatch;

4. The historical data is also analyzed to identify traffic volumes and patterns in order to assist in determining if adjustments to signal timing is necessary;

5. Verify if all timing is programmed correctly in each master and local controller.

HCI staff typically reports traffic signal problems and malfunctions to the City’s traffic signal maintenance contractor within (24) hours. HCI staff coordinates all work associated with the City’s contractor and also provides verification to the City of their completed work. HCI staff often assists the City in resolving traffic signal complaints by speaking by phone/email/in person with the resident(s)/City personnel on their specific request/complaint. HCI staff completes the necessary investigation and makes recommendations to the City on identified traffic signal improvements, such as equipment upgrade, more efficient signal phasing, significant timing adjustments, any new coordinated signal control systems, etc.

Upon request, HCI staff may also drive each project arterial during peak-periods in order to verify and fine-tune coordination timing. If necessary and approved by the City, HCI also coordinates/gathers updated traffic counts as part of the investigation.

The above approach has proven to be a valuable service to our client cities, as the on-going scheduled signal management has minimized overall time in troubleshooting, repair, and maintenance company efforts by City staff on their citywide traffic signal systems. In turn, this controlled management service actually saves the City on the amount of time and personnel required to monitor and repair signal related issues.

PAGE 315 of 403
14 of 14
Exhibit B
Fee Schedule
Fee Schedule found on the following page
PAGE 316 of 403
Hartzog & Crabill
Consulting Engineers
17852 E. 17th Street, Suite 101,  Tustin, CA 92780  (714) 731-9455 Schedule of Hourly Rates
Classification Hourly Rates
Expert Witness / Deposition....................................................................................... $290 Litigation Consultation............................................................................................... $260 Two-Person Survey Crew........................................................................................... $260 Litigation Field Evaluation......................................................................................... $235 Principal Consultant......................(Tram Hartzog & Jerry Stock, PE, TE)........... $180 Project Manager.......................................................................................................... $170 Registered Land Surveyor........................................................................................... $165 Senior Engineer……(Scott Ma, PE, TE, Bernie Dennis, TE, & Doug Anderson). $155 Storm Water Permit Compliance Engineer................................................................. $155 Associate Engineer.........................(Michael Vallado)................................................ $150 Construction Manager................................................................................................. $140 Traffic Signal System Supervisor…(Greg Cabey)...................................................... $140 Mural Artist.................................................................................................................. $140 Senior Designer..............................(Todd Hartzog & Dave Martorano)................... $135 Traffic Signal Systems Specialist...(Dave Pickrell & Michael Powers)..................... $130 Assistant Engineer........................................................................................................ $125 Draftsperson.................................................................................................................. $105 Technician..................................................................................................................... $ 90 Word Processor............................................................................................................. $ 75 Clerical.......................................................................................................................... $ 60 * Traffic Counts (Cost, plus 15%)............................................................................ $ * Note: Out of pocket expenses (blueprinting, reproduction, printing and delivery service) will be invoiced at Cost. These other direct costs are included in the not-to-exceed values for the aforementioned scope of services. A 15% fee for administration, coordination and handling will be added to subcontracted services. This Schedule of Hourly Rates is effective as of July 1, 2022. Rates may be adjusted after that date to compensate for increases of inflationary trends.

Mileage shall be per current IRS rate. Rate can be found at the following link:
https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-issues-standard-mileage-rates-for-2023-business-useincreases-3-cents-per-mile..

PAGE 317 of 403
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: John Incontro, Police Chief
Naved Qureshi, Commander
DATE: June 26, 2026
SUBJECT: POLICE DISPATCH RADIO COMMUNICATIONS REPEATER
ANTENNA UPGRADE - $17,387.98

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government
Safe Community
Well-Maintained Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
The San Marino Police Department maintains a police
dispatch radio communication repeater antenna system at the Huntington Library for the important task of public safety communications within the city.

The repeater antenna equipment is more than 15 years old and has surpassed its designed lifespan. It follows that there has been a steady decline in the availability of spare parts, increased cost of maintenance, and equipment reliability. Replacing the current radio repeater antenna system will enable effective and reliable communications by police officers, compatibility with other public safety agencies in the region, and the continued support for smooth operation of emergency response activities.

DISCUSSION
The current off-site Police Department radio communications repeater antenna is over 15 years old and needs to be replaced to meet current radio communication standards. The Commander Omni Fiberglass Antenna (450- 470 MHz, 7.1 dBi, N Female) provides significant advantages over most Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 318 of 403
exposed element arrays and delivers equal or superior electrical performance.

Commander Omni Antennas use multiple large-diameter copper radiating elements stacked collinearly, fed in phase, and enclosed in a weatherproof fiberglass housing. These DC-grounded units feature low-loss Teflon and insulated connectors. The antenna offers 5.0 dBd gain and can withstand winds of up to 100 mph (160 km/hr). It is ideal for duplex systems with 8 MHz or less separation between Tx and Rx frequencies. Multiple mounting hardware options are available for these antennas.

Key benefits of this antenna include a weatherproof design for reliable operation and the ability to withstand winds up to 100 mph. Additionally, the copper elements minimize the possibility of inter-modulation (unwanted signal) generation. The DC grounding further protects the system from lightning strikes.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The procurement is being conducted as a sole source for the installation of the repeater antenna and installation services. The selected vendor has consistently provided all required installation services for the project's communication systems and possesses in-depth knowledge of the installation and operation. Additionally, the vendor recently completed the antenna's temporary relocation due to ongoing construction at the Huntington Library and has unique knowledge of its current setup and operation. Therefore, retaining the same vendor is the most efficient and effective approach to reinstalling the repeater antenna at its permanent site.

The proposed replacement was budgeted in the FY 2026-27 budget as a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) item under account # 233-30-4613- 0004. The cost of the replacement includes the purchase and installation of the radio communications repeater antenna, as well as all applicable taxes.

The antenna is maintenance-free and should not incur
any additional maintenance costs.

Antenna $ 638.00
Installation $ 15,278.55
Taxes $ 1,471.43
Total $17,387.98
PAGE 319 of 403

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council approval for procuring and installing a new repeater antenna. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to approve the purchase and installation of a new replacement repeater antenna to be installed at the Huntington Library as approved in the FY2026-27 adopted budget.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Foothill Communications Installation Quote

2. Talley Commander Repeater Antenna Quote
PAGE 320 of 403
Foothill Communications, Inc.
133 N. San Gabriel Blvd #206
Pasadena CA 91107
United States
Quote
#EST11355
5/15/2026
EST11355
1 of 2
Bill To Ship To TOTAL
Angelica Gonzalez
San Marino Police Department
2200 Huntington Dr.

San Marino CA 91108
United States
San Marino Police Department
2200 Huntington Dr.

San Marino CA 91108
United States $16,687.77
Expires: 6/30/2026
Sales Rep Shipping Method
[email protected]
No.  Qty Item Tax Rate Amount
1 1 Tait TB9435S-100T TB9400 Single 100Watts Chassis Assembly Yes $1,170.59 $1,170.59 2 1 Tait T01-11103-LAAA TB9400 Reciter Stock 440-480MHz Yes $2,362.85 $2,362.85 3 1 Tait T01-11121-LBAA TB94 Linear PA 440-480MHz 100Watts Yes $1,866.51 $1,866.51 4 1 Tait T01-11140-ACAA TB9000 Power Management Unit AC with 24DC Volts and Aux 12/24/48
Yes $2,289.59 $2,289.59
5 1 Tait 219-01561-00 Cable cord 2m USA/CAD IEC black Yes $16.00 $16.00 6 1 Tait TBAS050 License SFE Key - P25 Common Air Interface (CAI) Yes $5,903.01 $5,903.01 7 1 Tait Repeater back up battery charging system modual Yes $250.00 $250.00 8 1 GNB Marathon, Industrial Telecom AGM Backup Battery, 12V 105AH, Front Terminal Mount or equivalent
Yes $595.00 $595.00
9 3 Installation of Tait TB9400 into shelter, and connection to power and antenna system
No $275.00 $825.00
Subtotal $15,278.55
Tax Total (9.75%) $1,409.22
Total $16,687.77
Deposit $
** DO NOT PAY – THIS IS AN ESTIMATE **
Equipment, hardware and materials covered by manufacturer’s warranty if applicable. Orders over $25,000. may require a deposit.

Modifications or deviations from those prescribed above requiring additional cost will be performed only upon
emailed/written direction and will incur charges over & above the estimate.

Cancellation of Service Calls within 24 business hours may be subject to a cancellation fee.

Delivery dates / completion of services is subject to strikes, accidents and vendor supply chains which are beyond our control.

PAGE 321 of 403
Foothill Communications, Inc.
133 N. San Gabriel Blvd #206
Pasadena CA 91107
United States
Quote
#EST11355
5/15/2026
EST11355
2 of 2
Authorized Signature: __________________________________________________________   P.O. # ____________________ Print Name: _____________________________________________________________________   Date: ____________________ PAGE 322 of 403
Quote #
Date
Page
Bill To Ship To
Customer PO
Accepted By
Prepared By Contact
Ship Via
Job #
Date
Product Description Quantity Unit
Price U/M ExtendedPrice
Release #/Site Name
Requested By
Line
Item
10173497
05/18/26
1 of 1

QUOTE CONFIRMATION
300001
WEB
MAIL INVOICE TO "SHIP TO"

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
LOS ANGELES, CA 90680

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NAVED QURESHI
2200 HUNTINGTON DR
SAN MARINO, CA 91108-2639
CMD201-7

RAY BANALES

BEST METHOD - GROUND
[email protected] NAVED QURESHI
Quotes are valid for 30 days.
638.00
$700.21
MDSE Total
Tax
Est. Freight
TOTAL
Freight and tax amounts shown above are our best estimates. Final Freight and Tax charges are determined at the time of shipping.

62.21 TBD
Other Charge 0.00
12976 Sandoval St.

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
800.949.7079 - [email protected]
Corporate Address
12 LOCATIONS NATIONWIDE - Atlanta Chicago Dallas Denver Kansas City Los Angeles(2) New York Orlando Phoenix Sacramento Seattle

SHOP CHAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Our online store has the latest
wireless products and accessories.

Got questions? Chat with a live
agent online or text 562.210.0094.

All quotes subject to Talley Terms and
Conditions.
1 CMD201-7 1 638.0000 EA 638.00
450-470 MHz 5dB Fiberglass
Omni Ant, N-Fem
Note: Special order item for you. It
cannot be canceled or returned.

PAGE 323 of 403
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Mario Rueda, Fire Chief
DATE: June 26, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REQUEST TO WAIVE SPECIAL EVENT

STANDBY SERVICE FEE FOR SAN MARINO HIGH
SCHOOL'S 2026 GRAD NIGHT EVENT

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government
Safe Community

BACKGROUND
Since 1955, San Marino High School has hosted a Grad Night event at the high school for graduating seniors. The long-standing tradition is organized, constructed, and funded primarily by parent volunteer contributions and donations from the San Marino community.

DISCUSSION
To ensure safety of the attending students, staff, and volunteers, the Fire Department engages with the Grad Night Committee early in the design phase of the event, ensuring fire protection is built into the props, construction features, access, and egress for all participants. This effort culminates with a requirement that a Fire Safety Officer be present for the duration of the Grad Night event. The Fire Safety Officer plays a critical role in protecting attendees by monitoring potential fire and life safety hazards, ensuring compliance with safety protocols, and providing immediate medical care if needed. The Fire Safety Officer is typically on standby for approximately 11 hours, covering the entire night of the event. The City of San Marino’s Adopted Fine and Fee Schedule includes a fee for Special Event Standby Service at $120 per hour, for a minimum of 8 hours.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 324 of 403
In furtherance of the City’s longstanding support and partnership with the San Marino Unified School District, and because the event is arranged entirely by parents, volunteer contributions, and donations from San Marino residents, staff are requesting approval to waive applicable fees for this annual tradition.

Waiving the fee will allow community resources to remain fully dedicated to creating a safe and memorable experience for graduating seniors.

The waiver of this fee would join the several other methods of direct monetary and in-kind support the City of San Marino provides the San Marino Unified School District. Other examples of such support include the City‘s funding of the crossing guard program throughout the community, public safety and public works services associated with the homecoming parade, police presence at high school sporting events, track meet coordination, library services, and more.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
On June 5, 2026, the San Marino Fire Safety Officer assigned to the San Marino High School Grad Night event was on standby from 6:00 PM to 5:00 AM. The total cost to provide standby services was $1,320.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council waive the Special Event Standby Service fee for San Marino High School’s 2026 Grad Night event. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
”I move to waive the Special Event Standby Service fee for San Marino High School’s 2026 Grad Night event.”
PAGE 325 of 403
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Amber Shah, Parks & Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: June 26, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-22, ADOPTING A LIST OF STREET PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
FUNDED BY SB 1, THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government
Well-Maintained Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
In April 2017, the Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB 1) was enacted into law, establishing a new funding source intended to address deferred maintenance and infrastructure investment on the state highway system and local street and road system. In order to utilize this funding, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) established guidelines requiring an annual submittal of project lists and other reporting requirements. The City’s Capital Improvement Program budget identifies eligible projects for the expenditure of these street maintenance funds under the annual Street Rehabilitation Program. The adoption of the attached Resolution along with the accompanying list of street projects will meet the reporting requirements established by the CTC and maintain the City’s eligibility to receive the Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB 1) funding.

DISCUSSION
The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB 1) was passed by the California Legislature on April 6, 2017, and signed into law by Governor Brown Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 326 of 403
on April 28, 2017. The Act raises over $5 billion per year for transportation infrastructure improvements and established the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). The funding distribution formula is population based on the following taxes enacted by SB1: $0.12 cents per gallon gasoline excise tax, $.20 cents per gallon diesel fuel excise tax, miscellaneous state transportation improvement fees, and transportation loan repayments. The funding became effective November 1, 2017, with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020. The City has received annual RMRA funding applied to eligible Street Rehabilitation Program projects.

In accordance with guidelines issued by the CTC for an agency to maintain eligibility to receive RMRA funding, the City must comply with all requirements, including submittal of annual project reporting to the CTC. This report includes developing and submitting a list of projects to the CTC by June 30th, as well as reporting project expenditures to the CTC following the end of each fiscal year.

In addition, in order to receive RMRA funds, cities and counties must meet and report upon a minimum “maintenance of effort” (MOE) expenditure requirement to ensure that these new road funds do not supplant existing levels of general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE report is submitted by staff on an annual basis, and the City continues to meet this requirement.

All streets in the City are eligible for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 RMRA funding.

The street list for the Street Rehabilitation Program project was developed utilizing the City Council adopted 2021 Pavement Management Plan to ensure efficiency and cost effectiveness of the selected streets. The streets included in Resolution No. R-26-22 (Attachment 1) are scheduled for rehabilitation in FY 2026-27.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The ability of the City to gain access to the SB 1 funding requires the adoption of an annual Resolution which conforms to the CTC’s guidelines. Approval of this Resolution will provide the City with approximately $353,054 in RMRA/SB 1 funding for FY 2026-27. These funds, combined with other forms of Highway User Tax Account funds, will supplement revenue provided by Capital Improvement Fund 394 for streets and roads maintenance and improvement.

LEGAL REVIEW
PAGE 327 of 403
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend the City Council approve Resolution No. R-26-22, adopting a list of Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB 1 projects. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to approve Resolution No. R-26-22 adopting a list of Fiscal Year 2026- 27 projects to be funded by SB 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Funds.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. R-26-22

2. Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
PAGE 328 of 403
RESOLUTION NO. R-26-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $353,054 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list, including approval of this resolution at the City Council meeting held on June 26, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City reconstruct, maintain and rehabilitate streets and roads throughout the City this year and similar projects into the future; and WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in an good condition and this revenue will help us increase PAGE 329 of 403
the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into an excellent condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct
SECTION 2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

A. Local Street Rehabilitation Project 25-9271; which involves the resurfacing of the following streets:
a. Lorain Road from West Drive to West Haven Road
b. Virginia Road from Circle Drive to Mill Lane
c. West Haven Road from Huntington Drive to Lorain Road This project has a 20-year estimated useful life; to be constructed beginning in September 2026 and ending in December 2026.

B. Local Street Rehabilitation Project 26-9271; which involves the slurry sealing of the following streets:
a. Adair Street from San Marino Avenue to Ridgeway Road b. Avonrea Road from Oak Street to Cul-de-Sac
c. Bedford Road from Huntington Drive to West Drive
d. Blackstone Road from Huntington Drive to Kinghurst Road e. Calaris Road from El Molino Avenue to Ramiro Road
f. Darby Road from Granada Avenue to Oak Knoll Avenue
g. Doresta Road from El Molino Avenue to North City Limit h. Duarte Road from Lorain Road to Rose Avenue
PAGE 330 of 403
i. El Molino Avenue from Wilson Avenue to North City Limit j. El Molino Place from Wilson Avenue to Pasqualito Drive k. Euclid Avenue from Mission Street to Monterey Road
l. Fleur Drive from El Molino Avenue to Ramiro Road
m. Lorain Road from Alhambra Road to West Drive
n. Lorain Road from Del Mar Avenue to Melville Road
o. McFarlane Street from Euclid Avenue to Cul-de-Sac
p. Melville Drive from San Marino Avenue to Del Mar Avenue q. Melville Drive from Del Mar Avenue to Cul-de-Sac
r. Montrobles Place from Los Robles Avenue to Monterey Road s. Oak Street from Garfield Avenue to Los Robles Avenue t. Pasqualito Drive from El Molino Avenue to Granada Avenue u. Pilgrim Place from Los Robles Avenue to Cul-de-Sac
v. Plymouth Road from Los Robles Avenue to Winthrop Road w. Roanoke Road from San Marino Avenue to Ridgeway Road x. Roanoke Road from Chelsea Road to Old Mill Road
y. Sharon Place from Rose Avenue to Rose Avenue
z. Sheffield Road from Rose Avenue to East City Limit
aa. Vandyke Road from Huntington Drive to Lorain Road
bb. Warwick Road from Huntington Drive to Lorain Road
cc. Wellesley Road from Sheffield Road to Somerset Place dd. Windsor Road from Huntington Drive to Lorain Road
This project has a 5-year estimated useful life; to be constructed beginning in April 2027 and ending in June 2027.

C. Street Sweeping – Citywide; which involves the mechanical sweeping of residential and arterial/collector streets throughout the City on a weekly basis PAGE 331 of 403
(52 times per year). Services will be obtained in compliance with the procurement requirements set forth in the City’s Municipal Code related to goods and services.

This project has a 1-year estimated useful life, and will occur from July 2026 to June 2027.

SECTION 3. The following previously proposed and adopted projects may also utilize Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in their delivery. With the relisting of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

A. Local Street Rehabilitation Project 24/25-9271; which involves the resurfacing of the following streets:
a. Duarte Road from Hilliard Drive to San Gabriel Boulevard b. Ridgeway Road from Huntington Drive to Roanoke Road
c. Ridgeway Road from Melville Drive to Adair Street
d. Ridgeway Road from Adair Street to Sherwood Road
e. San Marino Avenue from Adair Street to Sherwood Road f. San Marino Avenue from Sherwood Road to Lorain Road
g. Somerset Place from Wellesley Road to East City Limit h. Virginia Road from Rosalind Road to Circle Drive
i. Afton Road from S Oak Knoll Avenue to West City limits j. Courtland Avenue from Oak Knoll Avenue to Monterey Road k. Huntington Drive W/B from Virginia Road to N Granada Avenue l. Kenilworth Avenue from Huntington Drive to Melville Drive m. Oak Knoll Avenue from Sherwood Road to Darby Road
n. Roanoke Road from Ridgeway Road to Del Mar Avenue
o. Roanoke Road from St Albans Road to Virginia Road
PAGE 332 of 403
This project has a 20-year estimated useful life; to be constructed beginning in September 2026 and ending in December 2026.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 26th day of June, 2026.

TONY CHOU, MAYOR
ATTEST:

LIZETTE GUERRERO, ACTING CITY CLERK
PAGE 333 of 403

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Alison Walker, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-26-22 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of June, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

LIZETTE GUERRERO, ACTING CITY
CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO
PAGE 334 of 403
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide re 2025-26 2026-27Estimated May 2026 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct
INGLEWOOD 2,857,066 3,050,394 5,907,460 3,123,614 3,053,093 6,176,707IRWINDALE 39,732 48,014 87,746 49,032 42,458 91,490 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 584,434 540,839 1,125,273 598,295 577,947 1,176,242 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 164,971 148,868 313,839 168,786 159,082 327,868 LAKEWOOD 2,314,446 2,166,753 4,481,198 2,369,975 2,315,417 4,685,392 LA MIRADA 1,390,219 1,298,293 2,688,512 1,423,491 1,387,371 2,810,862 LANCASTER 4,680,584 4,987,857 9,668,442 5,107,810 5,001,726 10,109,536 LA PUENTE 1,074,073 1,000,741 2,074,814 1,099,720 1,069,403 2,169,123 LA VERNE 918,029 853,873 1,771,902 939,912 912,459 1,852,370 LAWNDALE 899,789 836,706 1,736,495 921,232 894,114 1,815,346 LOMITA 551,108 595,344 1,146,452 609,468 588,920 1,198,388 LONG BEACH 13,003,139 12,224,475 25,227,613 13,316,425 13,063,214 26,379,638 LOS ANGELES 109,086,294 102,647,419 211,733,713 111,716,916 109,690,208 221,407,124 LYNWOOD 1,930,041 1,804,956 3,734,997 1,976,298 1,928,797 3,905,095 MALIBU 308,139 282,676 590,815 315,384 302,071 617,455
MANHATTAN BEACH 1,002,849 933,705 1,936,554 1,026,778 997,768 2,024,546MAYWOOD 713,755 661,614 1,375,369 730,711 707,008 1,437,719 MONROVIA 1,099,586 1,024,753 2,124,340 1,125,849 1,095,063 2,220,912 MONTEBELLO 1,767,227 1,651,717 3,418,944 1,809,557 1,765,044 3,574,600 MONTEREY PARK 1,721,208 1,608,405 3,329,613 1,762,428 1,718,759 3,481,187 NORWALK 2,907,805 2,722,863 5,630,669 2,977,586 2,909,683 5,887,269 PALMDALE 4,750,434 4,457,124 9,207,558 4,864,660 4,762,934 9,627,593 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 381,322 351,555 732,877 390,332 375,675 766,007 PARAMOUNT 1,508,039 1,407,772 2,915,811 1,544,117 1,504,361 3,048,478 PASADENA 3,948,950 3,702,777 7,651,727 4,043,844 3,956,830 8,000,674 PICO RIVERA 1,635,919 1,750,442 3,386,361 1,792,367 1,748,162 3,540,529 POMONA 4,296,148 4,029,555 8,325,703 4,399,416 4,306,029 8,705,445 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 1,191,596 1,111,352 2,302,948 1,220,078 1,187,603 2,407,681 REDONDO BEACH 1,976,732 1,848,900 3,825,632 2,024,115 1,975,756 3,999,871 ROLLING HILLS (2)ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 245,846 224,988 470,834 251,612 240,424 492,036 ROSEMEAD 1,441,514 1,345,160 2,786,674 1,475,988 1,437,453 2,913,441 SAN DIMAS 984,385 916,327 1,900,713 1,007,869 979,198 1,987,067 SAN FERNANDO 672,583 623,804 1,296,387 688,570 666,604 1,355,174 SAN GABRIEL 1,114,469 1,038,761 2,153,230 1,141,090 1,110,032 2,251,122 SAN MARINO 358,830 330,386 689,216 367,297 353,054 720,351 SANTA CLARITA 6,515,544 6,118,425 12,633,968 6,672,345 6,538,219 13,210,564 May 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 21 PAGE 335 of 403 J
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Joseph Montes, City Attorney
DATE: June 26, 2026
SUBJECT: REPORT ON EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO
REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91 AND REQUEST TO

EXTEND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION 22050 AND SAN
MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)(8)

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
Fire Station 91, San Marino’s sole Fire Station is an essential public safety facility located within the City of San Marino that houses firefighting apparatus, emergency medical equipment, and fire personnel who provide emergency response services to the residents and businesses of the City. The facility is critical to the City's ability to deliver uninterrupted fire suppression and emergency medical response capabilities to the community.

City staff recently discovered that a long-term water leak within the Fire Station has caused significant and extensive water damage to the structure.

The damage includes deterioration of walls, flooring, electrical systems, and other building components critical to the continued safe operation of the fire station.

Upon discovery of the water damage, the City Manager, acting pursuant to the authority delegated under San Marino Municipal Code Section Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
John Chou, Council Member
Hunter Chang, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 336 of 403

04.03.02(A), proclaimed a public emergency in connection with the water damage at the Fire Station and authorized immediate actions to assess, remediate, and repair the damage. Section 02.06.05(A)(8) of the San Marino Municipal Code delegates to the City Manager the power to proclaim a public emergency, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1102, to immediately take all actions directly required by the emergency, to procure needed goods, services, and public projects, and to contract for public projects without informal or formal bidding.

At the April 24, 2026, City Council meeting, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. R-26-08, ratifying the City Manager’s proclamation of emergency and authorizing emergency procurement of construction and other related services to repair/remediate Fire Station 91. That resolution and governing law require that a report on progress be provided at each Council meeting and a decision be made as to whether to extend the emergency proclamation to facilitate continued emergency procurement.

DISCUSSION
Since the Council’s action, staff have been working with the City’s insurer, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) and their designees to prepare for the remediation and repair work. The following work is currently in various stages of progress:
- Executed and completed an initial contract with ServePro for initial response, assessment, and rental equipment. Final invoice is pending. - Executed and completed a contract with Enviro Check for a variety of biological testing services. Cost for services was $2,590.00. - Executed a contract with Mobile Modular for the rental of temporary office and housing facilities for the Fire Department personnel. The facilities are expected to be delivered to the Civic Center during the week of May 11th. Current cost estimate is $44,245.51.
- Executed a contract with BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC for remediation work. Current cost estimate is $120,919.68. - Negotiating a scope of work and contract with BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC for repair work. Costs are unknown at this time. - Executed a contract with Griffin Structures for construction management services to oversee the work of BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC.

Current cost estimate is $58,721.
- The City’s Information Technology (IT) servicer SDI is fulfilling the various IT needs related to the move out of the Fire Station and into the temporary facilities. Costs are unknown at this time.

PAGE 337 of 403
- Executed and completed a contract with Westnet for fire personnel alerting equipment installation. Current cost estimate is $18,651.06. - Executed a contract with The Lavatory for additional temporary shower and restroom trailer facilities for fire personnel. Current cost estimate is $9,265.88.
- Executed and completed a second contract with Enviro Check for asbestos testing services. Cost for services was approximately $900. -
Construction to complete utility connections to the temporary living and office facilities was completed on June 2. On Wednesday, June 3, all fire department personnel moved into the temporary living and office facilities and are now operating out of these units. Demolition work of the subfloor within the fire station has begun and is now approximately 40% complete as of June 16.

Abandoned mechanical ducting was discovered in the crawlspace spanning several areas of the station. Testing is being conducted on the ducting to ensure it can safely be removed. Next steps concurrently with demolition include engineering assessments of the crawlspace and pier footings of the building.

It is unknown at this time whether additional emergency procurements will be required for the restoration work at Fire Station 91, but staff anticipates having a better understanding in that regard as repair activity progresses and undertaking the standard procurement procedures will unnecessarily delay repair and remediation of Fire Station 91. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Council determine that the emergency action approved in Resolution No.

R-26-08 be continued to facilitate expeditious repair and restoration of the Fire Station.

Ongoing Review Requirements
Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(c) and San Marino Municipal Code Section 02.06.05(A)(8), the City Council must review the emergency action at each regularly scheduled meeting and determine, by a four-fifths (4/5) vote, whether there is a need to continue the emergency action and whether that work should continue without the benefit of informal or formal bidding. The City Council shall terminate the emergency action at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant so that the remainder of the emergency action may be completed by giving notice for bids to let contracts. Staff will report to the City Council on the status of the emergency project at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at each regular meeting thereafter, as required by the Public Contract Code, until the repairs are completed.

PAGE 338 of 403
Environmental Analysis
The emergency repairs to Fire Station 91 are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15269 (Emergency Projects).

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The full cost of the emergency repair work at Fire Station 91 is not yet known and will depend upon the scope of remediation required once a full assessment of the water damage has been completed. The City Manager will negotiate contracts with qualified contractors and vendors necessary to assess, remediate, and repair the damage. Even though there is no formal bid process required in emergency projects, the City Manager will make reasonable efforts to obtain competitive pricing where feasible and consistent with the urgency of the emergency. All contracts entered into pursuant to the Resolution shall be subject to applicable prevailing wage requirements. Staff will provide the City Council with regular updates on expenditures incurred pursuant to the Resolution at each regularly scheduled meeting.

While the costs of the emergency repair work are unknown at this time, the City anticipates a significant portion to be covered by the City’s property insurance policies with the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority subject to the City’s coverage limits. At a minimum, the City expects to be responsible for the insurance policy’s deductible of $15,000. Expenses not covered by insurance will be paid for out of the City’s General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance (Reserves).

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council receive the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and extend the emergency by a 4/5 vote to facilitate expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:

PAGE 339 of 403
"I move to receive and file the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and to extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26- 08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91."

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. R-26-08
PAGE 340 of 403
PAGE 341 of 403
PAGE 342 of 403
PAGE 343 of 403
PAGE 344 of 403
PAGE 345 of 403
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Amber Shah, Parks & Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: June 26, 2026
SUBJECT: SUMMER 2026 PUBLIC TREE REMOVAL LIST

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Beautiful, Preserved, Single-Family Neighborhoods
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Safe Community
Well-Maintained Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
On October 27, 2023, the City Council adopted revisions to the City’s Street Tree Policy and Procedures amending the removal process. In accordance with the revised Policy, the Parks & Public Works Department is required to submit a list of recommended trees to be removed to the City Council tree liaisons for review and comment prior to forwarding to the full City Council as an informational item. City Council Member Shepherd Romey is the primary liaison and City Council Member Chang is the alternate.

Pursuant to Section 7.1 of the City’s Street Tree Policy, the Department will review the proposed tree removal list with the City Council’s tree liaison(s) “…so that the liaison(s) can verify the accuracy of the list and confirm that the proposed removals are consistent with the requirements of this policy”. After review with the tree liaison, the list is now being forwarded to the City Council.

DISCUSSION
The Department has prepared a listing of ten (10) City-owned trees proposed for removal pursuant to Section 7.2 of the City’s Street Tree Policy. Section

7.2 of this Policy provides the following as justifications for tree removal:

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 346 of 403
· The tree is dead.
· The tree has reached an over-mature condition and is in declining health that will result in its death within the year.
· The tree is infected with a disease that cannot be treated successfully and/or there is a strong potential that the pathogen could spread to other trees in the immediate vicinity.
· The tree has been determined to be a public health and safety hazard because of its high potential for failure due to considerable dead or dying foliage, branches, roots, or trunk.
· The tree requires extensive root pruning because of excessive hardscape damage resulting in a severe reduction in its capacity to support itself and thereby creating a potential safety hazard.
· The tree due to its growth habit and location creates a safety hazard. · Removal of the tree has been approved as part of a City Council-approved capital improvement project.

The City’s contracted arborist, Harnisch Tree Care Consulting Arborists, has identified the trees proposed for removal as meeting one or more of the applicable removal criteria. Due to the current vacancy of the City’s Urban Forester position, the contracted arborist is performing these evaluations on behalf of the City. Staff also experienced recent turnover within the Department, including transition of responsibilities to a recently filled Management Analyst position. That transition required temporary redistribution of tree inventory coordination and reporting duties.

Under normal operating conditions, tree assessment reports of this nature are typically brought forward during the spring and fall reporting cycles. However, due to the aforementioned staffing vacancy and transitional workload adjustments, this item is being presented outside of the typical seasonal schedule and is instead being brought forward during the summer cycle.

On June 15, 2026, the Department provided both the primary and alternate liaisons with a list of ten (10) City-owned trees recommended for removal, along with photographs and arborist reports prepared by Harnisch Tree Care Consulting Arborists for each tree. The list of trees proposed for removal and the corresponding arborist reports are included as Attachments 2 and 3, respectively. Residents at impacted locations will receive a minimum 10-day notice prior to any tree removal activities.

The Department will schedule replacement plantings based on availability and appropriate planting seasons.

PAGE 347 of 403

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The cost to remove each tree is approximately $700 per tree. The City’s adopted FY 2026-27 annual budget for tree maintenance, which includes removals, replacements, grid pruning, and emergency call outs is $431,250 and is funded under the Grounds Division - Other Contract Services (Acct. No. 101-52-4150-0000). Removals are performed by Mariposa Tree Management, the City’s contracted tree maintenance vendor. Sufficient funds are available in the budget to complete the work.

Procurement review is not applicable.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item. Therefore, no action is required by City Council.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Memorandum to City Council Tree Liaisons - June 15, 2026

2. List of Summer 2026 Public Tree Removals

3. Proposed Tree Removals with Completed Arborist Reports, Photos, and Location Information
PAGE 348 of 403
TO: Council Member Gretchen Shepherd Romey, City Council Tree Liaison CC: Council Member Hunter Chang, City Council Tree Liaison Alternate Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
FROM: Amber Shah, Director of Parks and Public Works/City Engineer BY: David Castro, Management Analyst
DATE: June 15, 2026
SUBJECT: PROPOSED SUMMER 2026 CITY TREE REMOVAL LIST FOR

REVIEW BY CITY COUNCIL TREE LIAISON
The Department has prepared a listing of ten (10) City-owned trees that are being considered for removal pursuant to Section 7.2 of the City’s street tree policy.

The City’s Contracted Arborist has identified these trees as either being dead with no hope of recovery, effectively dead, or diseased and posing a threat to public safety or other nearby healthy trees.

Additional information for each identified tree is available in Attachments 1 and 2, which include arborist reports and photo documentation completed and compiled by the City’s Contracted Arborist.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that you review the attached tree removal list. The next step will be to forward this list to the City Council at their June 26th meeting as an informational item. The Department is available to provide other information or documents necessary to facilitate your review of our recommendations.

PAGE 349 of 403

ATTACHMENTS

1. List of Summer 2026 Proposed Tree Removals

2. Proposed tree removals with detailed evaluations, photos, and location clarification 2 PAGE 350 of 403
Summer 2026 Public Tree Removal List
6/26/26 City Council Meeting
Tree
#
Address Species DBH Reason
For Proposed
Removal
Notes
1 1430 Cambridge
Rd
Quercus
agrifolia

48.2” Tree is in
severe decline
Corner property - Tree
is physically located on
Monterey Rd
2 1101 Lorain Rd Quercus
agrifolia

55.3” Tree is in
severe decline
3 2290 Sherwood
Rd
Quercus
agrifolia

38.5” Tree is in
severe decline
4 2949 Shakespeare
Rd
Liquidambar
styraciflua

12.6” Tree is in
very poor
condition
5 2689 E. California
Blvd
Quercus
agrifolia
28” Tree is dead Tree is partially
screened by a hedge in
the parkway area
6 1620 Oak Grove
Ave
Liquidambar
styraciflua

12.3” Tree is dead
7 2530 Lorain Rd Quercus
agrifolia
20” Tree is dead Corner property - Tree
is physically located on
Del Mar Ave
8 2545 Fairfield Pl Liquidambar
styraciflua
16” Tree is dead
and infected
Corner property - Tree
is physically located on
S Santa Anita Ave
9 2840 Duarte Rd Quercus
agrifolia
22” Tree is dead
10 Huntington Dr.

Median (Near N
Granada Ave)
Ginkgo biloba 17.7” Tree is dead Tree is physically
located within the
raised median on
Huntington Dr
PAGE 351 of 403
Tree #1
1430 Cambridge Rd
Tree #1 is located adjacent tothe property located at 1430 Cambridge Rd. As this is a corner property, the tree itself is physically located on Monterey Rd. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 352 of 403
Photos of Coast Live Oak Tree @ 1430 Cambridge Rd. (Tree #7715) PAGE 353 of 403
PAGE 354 of 403
PAGE 355 of 403
Tree #2
1101 Lorain Rd
Tree #2 is located within the public right-of-way along Lorain Rd, adjacent to the frontage of the property at 1101 Lorain Rd. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 356 of 403
PAGE 357 of 403
PAGE 358 of 403
PAGE 359 of 403
Tree #3
2290 Sherwood Rd
Tree #3 is located in front of the property located at 2290 Sherwood Rd. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 360 of 403
PAGE 361 of 403
PAGE 362 of 403
PAGE 363 of 403
Tree #4
2949 Shakespeare Dr
Tree #4 is located in front of the property located at 2949 Shakespeare Dr. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 364 of 403
PAGE 365 of 403
PAGE 366 of 403
PAGE 367 of 403
Tree #5
2689 E California Blvd
Tree #5 is located in front of the property located at 2689 E California Blvd. This tree is partially screened by a hedge in the parkway area. However, it is confirmed to be a City tree. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 368 of 403
PAGE 369 of 403
PAGE 370 of 403
PAGE 371 of 403
Tree #6
1620 Oak Grove Ave
Tree #6 is located in front of the property at1620 Oak Grove Ave, on the right side. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 372 of 403
PAGE 373 of 403
PAGE 374 of 403
PAGE 375 of 403
Tree #7
2530 Lorain Rd
Tree #7 is located adjacent to the property located at 2530 Lorain Rd. As this is a corner property, the tree itself is physically located on Del Mar Ave. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 376 of 403
PAGE 377 of 403
PAGE 378 of 403
PAGE 379 of 403
Tree #8
2545 Fairfield Pl
Tree #8 is located adjacent to the property located at 2545 Fairfield Pl. As this is a corner property, the tree itself is physically located on S Santa Anita Ave. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 380 of 403
PAGE 381 of 403
PAGE 382 of 403
PAGE 383 of 403
Tree #9
2840 Duarte Rd
Tree #9 is located in front of the property located at 2840 Duarte. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 384 of 403
PAGE 385 of 403
PAGE 386 of 403
PAGE 387 of 403
Tree #10
Huntington Dr. Median (Near N Granada Ave)
Tree #10 is located within the raised median on Huntington Dr, just west of the intersection with N Granada Ave. See attached arborist report and images for additional information.

PAGE 388 of 403
PAGE 389 of 403
PAGE 390 of 403
PAGE 391 of 403
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Clarice Dai, City Treasurer
DATE: June 26, 2026
SUBJECT: CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
MAY 2026

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The City of San Marino’s Investment Policy adopted by the City Council on April 10, 2024, Section 16.0, Reporting, stipulates that the Treasurer shall review and render monthly reports to the City Council of all cash and investments held by the City. The report shall include the following information for all cash accounts and bank deposits:
• Balance at the end of the month
• Interest rate (for all interest-bearing active deposits) The report shall include the following information for all investments:
• A listing of individual securities held at the end of the month, by security type;
• Issuer, date of maturity, date of purchase, par and the dollar amount invested;
• Coupon, discount or earnings rate; and
• Current market value as of the date of the report and the source of this same valuation; and
• The weighted average maturity and weighted average yield of all investments combined.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 392 of 403
The above information may be submitted in the form of copies of statements received by the custodial institution. For investments with LAIF, the most recent statement or statements received from the State Treasurer may be included in the monthly report in lieu of the information noted above. The report shall include a listing of all investment transactions for the month (Government Code Section 53607). The report must also include a statement of compliance of the portfolio to the statement of investment policy, or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance, as well as a statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months, or an explanation as to why sufficient money shall, or may, not be available (Government Code Section 53646). Reports shall be rendered to the City Council and City Manager within 30 days following the end of the month of the period covered by the report.

DISCUSSION

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
The City maintains petty cash on City facilities, cash in bank, cash in a transactional investment account, deposits with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), two Section 115 Trusts, investments in negotiable Certificates of Deposit, investments in Municipal Securities, and investments in U.S.

Government Agency Securities. All items are detailed in the attachment to this report. A summary of portfolio content is found below. The attachment to this report offers specific detail on each category of investment.

PAGE 393 of 403

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE
As of 5/31/26, the annual percentage yield earned on the bank IMMA is

2.78%. The effective yield for LAIF deposits is 3.810%. The average yield on CDs is 3.15%. The average yield on US Government Agency Securities is

1.367%. Total combined portfolio yield for May 2026 is 3.08%.

Allocation
Petty Cash on City Premises 1,397$ 0%
Cash in Bank-checking accounts 5,092,763 13%
Cash in Bank-IMMA 19,078,558 48%
CERBT Section 115 Trust 900,000 2%
CEPPT Section 115 Trust 1,500,000 4%
Deposits with LAIF 9,419,850 24%
Certificates of Deposit 3,201,000 8%
Treasury Obligations - 0%
US Government Agency Securities 750,000 2%
Municipal Securities - 0%
Cash and Investments 39,943,568$ 100%
Cash and Investments Portfolio Summary
City of San Marino
2024 2025 2026
Jan 4.012 4.366 3.931
Feb 4.122 4.333 3.871
Mar 4.232 4.313 3.826
Apr 4.272 4.281 3.811
May 4.332 4.272 3.81
Jun 4.48 4.269
Jul 4.516 4.258
Aug 4.579 4.251
Sep 4.575 4.212
Oct 4.518 4.150
Nov 4.477 4.096
Dec 4.434 4.025
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Average Monthly Effective Yields
PAGE 394 of 403
2024 2025 2026
Jan $39,122,223 $38,498,486 $32,900,183
Feb $38,930,344 $37,958,423 $33,247,398
Mar $37,428,779 $32,575,434 $30,984,162
Apr $42,745,381 $36,992,117 $37,566,980
May $45,009,003 $38,813,591 $39,943,568
Jun $43,336,679 $36,874,092
Jul $36,943,792 $29,078,254
Aug $35,154,415 $27,945,761
Sep $34,014,793 $26,345,855
Oct $31,862,773 $24,401,895
Nov $30,699,222 $23,558,742
Dec $38,226,238 $30,560,577
Total Cash and Investments
PAGE 395 of 403

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
There is no fiscal impact and procurement review is not applicable.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council receive and file this report. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Cash and Investment Report for the Month of May 2026.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Treasurer’s Report as of May 31,2026
PAGE 396 of 403
Maturity Par Bank Market
Deposit/Investment Type Bank/Issuer Date Value Balance Value Rate Cash on PremisesPetty Cash & Cash Drawer City Hall 522.77 522.77 522.77 Petty Cash Fire Department 300.00 300.00 300.00
Petty Cash & Cash Drawer Recreation Department 100.00 100.00 100.00 Petty Cash & Cash Drawer Library 324.20 324.20 324.20
Petty Cash & Cash Drawer Lacy Park 150.00 150.00 150.00 Petty Cash Police Department - - -
1,397 1,397 1,397
Cash in Bank-checking accountsInvestment Transaction Interest Account BMO Bank 205-XXX-X 8,183 8,183 8,183General Operating East West Bank-00-811xx753 5,084,580 5,084,580 5,084,580 Payroll (ZBA) East West Bank-00-811xx761 - - -Worker's Compensation (ZBA) East West Bank-00-811xx779 - - -Sub total 5,092,763 5,092,763 5,092,763Cash in Bank-money market accountMoney Market East West Bank-00-811xx787 19,078,558 19,078,558 19,078,558 2.78% Total Cash in Bank 24,171,321 24,171,321 24,171,321
Maturity Par Book Market
Deposit/Investment Type Bank/Issuer Date Value Value Value Rate InvestmentsPooled Funds California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) 900,000 900,000 1,154,537Pooled Funds California Employers' Pension Prefunding Trust (CEPPT) 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,852,032Pooled Funds State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 9,419,850 9,419,850 9,419,669 3.810% BMO Bank Safekeeping Bank of America NA CUSIP #06051XEG3 (FDIC #3510) 06/08/26 245,000 245,000 245,074 5.05% BMO Bank Safekeeping UBS Bank USA CUSIP #90348JM72 (FDIC #57565) 06/16/26 250,000 250,000 249,613 0.85%BMO Bank Safekeeping Toyota Financial SGS BK CUSIP #89235MLC3 (FDIC #57542) 07/15/26 248,000 248,000 247,048 0.95% BMO Bank Safekeeping Bank Hapoalim B. M. CUSIP #06251A2Y5 (FDIC #33686) 07/23/26 248,000 248,000 246,886 0.95%BMO Bank Safekeeping Synchrony Bank CUSIP #87164WA24 (FDIC #27314) 08/13/26 248,000 248,000 246,440 0.90%BMO Bank Safekeeping State Bank of India CUSIP #856285XL0 (FDIC #33682) 09/28/26 248,000 248,000 245,679 1.15%BMO Bank Safekeeping Citibank NA CUSIP #17312Q4A4 (FDIC #7213) 09/29/26 243,000 243,000 243,816 5.10%BMO Bank Safekeeping Morgan Stanley Bank NA CUSIP #61773TDG5 (FDIC #32992) 04/20/27 246,000 246,000 243,336 2.75%BMO Bank Safekeeping Popular BK New York BRH IN CUSIP#73317ADB5 (FDIC #34967) 06/07/27 245,000 245,000 247,024 4.80%BMO Bank Safekeeping Morgan Stanley Private BK NATL CUSIP#61768E4S9 (FDIC #34221) 06/07/27 245,000 245,000 247,254 4.90%BMO Bank Safekeeping Medallion BK Utah CUSIP#58404DVG3 (FDIC #57449) 06/21/27 245,000 245,000 246,938 4.75%BMO Bank Safekeeping BNY Mellon NA INSTL CTF DEP CUSIP#05584CPT7 (FDIC #7946) 06/20/28 245,000 245,000 246,989 4.50%BMO Bank Safekeeping Sallie Mae Bank Murray Utah CD CUSIP#795451DK6 (FDIC #58177) 07/17/29 245,000 245,000 247,795 4.50% 3,201,000 3,201,000 3,203,892 3.15%
Treasury ObligationsNone None - - - 0.00%US Government Agency SecuritiesBMO Bank Safekeeping Federal Farm Credit Bank CUSIP #3133EMH21 06/15/26 250,000 250,000 249,680 0.900%BMO Bank Safekeeping Federal Farm Credit Bank CUSIP #3133ENHC7 12/14/26 500,000 500,000 493,965 1.600% 750,000 750,000 743,645 1.367%
City of San Marino
As of May 31, 2026
Treasurer's Report
PAGE 397 of 403
Maturity Par Bank Market
City of San Marino
As of May 31, 2026
Treasurer's Report
3,951,000 3,951,000 3,947,537
Total Cash & Investments 39,943,568 39,943,568 40,546,493 3.08% Clarice Dai , City Treasurer
Clarice Dai , City TreasurerI hereby certify that this report is in compliance with the City’s Investment Policy as adopted by the City Council on April 10, 2024, and the source of market valuation is obtained from various bank statements, the monthly CERBT, CEPPT & LAIF statements and the investment safekeeping account statement with US Bank. The City has the ability to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

PAGE 398 of 403
LAIF
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
No transactions this month
East West Bank Money Market Account
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
5/13/2026 Transfer to Operating to cover operating expenditures (300,000) 5/27/2026 Transfer from BMO Security Matured 760,000
5/27/2026 Transfer from Operating Property taxes received and invested in Money Market 2,000,000 BMO Bank Safekeeping
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
5/19/2026 Goldman Sachs Bank USA CUSIP #38149MWH2 (FDIC #33124) Matured 249,000 Security Matured 5/26/2026 Federal Home Loan Bank CUSIP #3130B1L70 called 500,000 Security Called 5/27/2026 Transfer to Money Market Account (760,000)
CalPERS CERBT Trust
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
No transactions this month
CalPERS CEPPT Trust
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
No transactions this month
PAGE 399 of 403
PAGE 400 of 403
May 3.810
April 3.811
March 3.826
February 3.871
January 3.931
December 4.025
PMIA Average Life(1): 261
LAIF Fair Value Factor(1): 0.999980831
PMIA Daily(1): 3.82
PMIA Quarter to Date(1): 3.92
LAIF Apportionment Rate(2): 3.98
LAIF Earnings Ratio(2): 0.00010906180047888
LAIF Administrative Cost(1)*: 0.24
Treasuries

57.86%
Agencies

21.44%
Certificates of
Deposit/Bank Notes

10.19%
Time
Deposits

2.98%
Commercial
Paper

6.85%
Corporate
Bonds

0.56%
Loans

0.12%
Notes: The apportionment rate includes interest earned on the CalPERS Supplemental Pension Payment pursuant to Government Code 20825 (c)(1) .
*The percentage of administrative cost equals the total administrative cost divided by the quarterly interest earnings. The law provides that administrative costs are not to exceed 5% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund. However, if the 13-week Daily Treasury Bill Rate on the last day of the fiscal year is below 1%, then administrative costs shall not exceed 8% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund for the subsequent fiscal year.

Source:
(1) State of California, Office of the Treasurer
(2) State of California, Office of the Controller
PMIA Average Monthly
Effective Yields(1)
PMIA/LAIF Performance Report
as of 06/03/26
Daily rates are now available here. View PMIA Daily Rates Quarterly Performance
Quarter Ended 03/31/26
Chart does not include $803,000.00 in mortgages, which equates to 0.001%. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

Pooled Money Investment Account
Monthly Portfolio Composition (1)
04/30/26
$183.4 billion
PAGE 401 of 403
Institution:

Weekly as of Date:

Signature Date
Name and Title
Weekly Call Report Certification
Local Agency Security Program
Two authorized officers are required to executed the Weekly Call Report pursuant to CCR§16005.1.1(a).

The authorized signers of East West Bank each declares, for himself or herself alone and not for the other: I hereby verify that I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in the Weekly Call Report (as of 05/27/2026) submitted pursuant to GC§ 53663(b) and CCR§16005.4.2 to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contained therein is true and correct.

Name and Title
Lily Li, VP- Assistant Treasury Operation Manager
East West Bank
5/27/2026
Signature Date
Mike Burdian, SVP-Director Treasury Middle Office
and Counterparty Risk Management
05/28/2026 05/28/2026
PAGE 402 of 403
Weekly Call Report
Local Agency Security Program
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Institution Name: East West Bank CID #: 194
Total
Mailing Address:

Weekly Report As of Date:
135 N Los Robles Ave, 8th Floor , Pasadena, CA 91101
5/27/2026 Submission Date: 5/28/2026
Pool #1 (x110%) Pool #2 (x150%) Pool #3 (x105%)
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Less: CDAR Deposits: $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Deposits & Accrued Interest:

Less: Deposits Subject to Waivers:

Less: Interest:

Less: Uncollected Funds:
$ -
$ 757,610,893.88
$ -
$ -
$ 573,878,880.59
$ 1,423,357,977.13
$ 127,944,911.89
$ -
$ -
$ 573,878,880.59
$ 1,423,357,977.13
$ 127,944,911.89
Federal Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco
Minimum Collateral Required:
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 721,534,184.65
$ 757,610,893.88
$ - $ 721,534,184.65
$ -
$ -
$ -
Less: Other (Specify on Line 17):

Total Secured Deposits:
$ 32,389,106.12
Agent of Depository:

SVP-Director Treasury Middle Office and Counterparty Risk Management VP- Assistant Treasury Operation Manager
Authorizer #1 Name:

Authorizer #2 Name:

Authorizer #1 Title:

Authorizer #2 Title:

Mike Burdian
Lily Li
6267686949
[email protected]
Description of Other Deposits:
$ 790,000,000.00
Excess/Deficiency in Pledged Collateral: $ 32,389,106.12 Preparer Name:

Preparer Title:

Preparer Phone #:

Preparer Email Address:

Shan Xu
Treasury Analyst II
Market Value of Pledged Securities as of
Weekly Report Date: $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 790,000,000.00
PAGE 403 of 403